lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rarities (1980 The Beatles album)

message: Does it loop continously on this album like it does on Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band? --Ian911299
:I can only answer about the British Sgt. Pepper LP in which the inner groove is heard right on the runout groove with the final three or so sylliables repeated over and over on the final groove until you take the tonearm off the LP. Steelbeard1 21:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have the US Rarities LP. It only plays the snippet for about 3 seconds, or once through. The inner groove is silent. Cheemo 06:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thank you. Ian911299 05:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sgt. Pepper Inner Groove 

message: Has anyone noticed how a lot of AMG reviews (like the one for this album) are written in the present tense? What I mean is they are reviewing this album from todays stand point (stating that all these songs are virtually available in the US elsewhere). While I could understand it if the album was still in print, as far as I'm aware it has never been issued on CD. So any crictism of this album that takes into account facts after the event is pretty much mute. At this time this was the only way American's could buy early cuts such as "There's a place", which had not been available in the US for many years since the original Vee Jay record was pulled from the market. Just a thought. 205.188.116.8 14:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AMG Review

message: I moved this page to Rarities (The Beatles US album) but it was moved back. I did not believe it needed discussion because I thought it was a simple uncontroversial move to shorten "American" to "US" as per convention. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 13:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Tears of the Prophets

message: I've cleaned up the article. A lot more can be said though, like what part the orbs played in the storyline. Hence the expand tag. --Fang Aili  說嗎? 14:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just curious - if the heading of this article indicates that Tears is the alternate name for Bajoran Orbs, shouldn't Bajoran Orbs or Orbs (Bajoran) or Orbs (Star Trek) be the primary page for this article? TheHYPO 18:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's debatable, I think. It's more accurate to say that "Tears of the Prophets" are another name for the orbs, since they are refered to in so many different ways ("orbs of the prophets", "bajoran orbs", "orbs of Bajor", "tears of the prophets", etc). Or is there an official name for these things? --Fang Aili  talk 19:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since they are always referred to as 'the orb of something', I have to say that the official title should have 'orb' in it... tears of the prophets sounds clearly like a spiritual euphamism than an official name.... Were I looking them up, I'd look up Bajoran Orbs TheHYPO 18:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I brought it up at Wikiproject Star Trek. --Fang Aili talk 19:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would go with Orb (Star Trek) but definitely not the present title.--Kalsermar 19:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would go with "Orbs of the Prophets". That's what they've been called several times in the show, but have "Tears of the Prophets" re-direct since on the show that is what the Bajorans call them. TJ Spyke 06:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Name? 

message: Just a quick note to say that I intend to nominate this for GA in a couple of months as the reviews at the AV Club are now only a single season behind. Considering that they do two episodes a week, that means that in September/October they should be reviewing this episode. After that is added, I'll nominate. Of course, copyedits are always welcome before then! :) Miyagawa (talk) 10:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And here we are, three and a half years later. I'd completely forgotten about this article. Now the hold off is that I have a copy of Star Trek: Action! sitting on a shelf, which has around a third of it devoted to this episode. It's on my to do list. Miyagawa (talk) 09:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA nomination 

message: I've deleted a chunk of words on military and religion, which I feel is unneeded for this article on the episode of DS9 - the episode didn't really address any of the issues mentioned in that paragraph, and would be better suited to an article on military/religion issues.163.160.107.179 (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military/Religion themes 

message: The webpage cited includes fifth season episodes in a list of the sixth season. - DS9 Forever (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The R next to the episode number in the left hand column denotes that the particular airing was a re-run/repeat. Miyagawa (talk) 09:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings cite accurate?
Talk:Historic Jamestown

message: Is there any way to get a map that shows only Virginia so it can be more precise? Alexiskferia (talk) 19:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: If we reference the historic town, the spelling should match the time.  Captaine John Smith called it James Towne (two words), not Jamestowne. 
See http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=lhbcb&fileName=0262a/lhbcb0262a.db&recNum=132&itemLink=r?ammem/lhbcb:@field(DOCID+@lit(lhbcb0262adiv12)):%230262a0133&linkText=1
ClassicalScholar 00:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect spelling of James Towne 
Talk:President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography

message: a mention of the Hill-Link Minority Report needs to be made, but i can't find any information on it that isn't from a far-right leaning group.  Anyone willing to help?
67.177.22.7 17:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hill-Link

message: What was the Supreme Court case? I'd guessed Stanley v. Georgia, but that was '69 (and decided after LBJ had left office). Lapicero 23:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Case?

message: ... was the report published? Maikel (talk) 12:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Maikel (talk) 12:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When

message: The three links to primary sources on this page are to something called "Hathi Trust Digital Library".  This 'library' acknowledges that Google digitised the documents, and then requires the reader to be a member of one of a couple of dozen educational institutions in order to be able to download the reports or access more than one page at a time!  Is there no publicly accessible record? Ambiguosity (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reports not available openly? 

message: This article fails to provide any evidence that this report actually exists. I can not find a copy of this report anywhere. I can only conclude that somebody created this article as a hoax, therefore I recommend that it be deleted unless somebody can verify the report's existence. Kotterdale44 (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not exist
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Williamo1

message: I think other things done by Williamo1 (William Oosterman) are actually more signficant than what's mentioned regarding Hyper-Calvinism.  He's threatened a user with legal action  .  
He engages in "near vandalism" by putting editorial comments/arguements into the article itself.  
.
He made an auto-bio of himself , which is basically using Wikipedia as his personal web host.
He's also been using certain articles (Roy Gordon Lawrence, William Oosterman, Citywide Church) as an opportunity to bash ex-members of Citywide Church.  Obviously his POV pushing at hyper-calvanism is a problem, but I think his use of Wikipedia for a purely personal agenda is even more concerning.  --Rob 17:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So add that to the RfC. JoshuaZ 17:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other issues
Talk:Johnny Ace

message: I read he died like this:
::After performing at the City Auditorium in Houston, late in the evening, Ace, by that time very drunk, fired a .22 calibre revolver at his girlfriend, Olivia Gibbs. He then fired at her terrified friend Mary Carter, but on both occaisions the gun failed to go off. Ace promtly aimed the revolver at himself, and at a third squeeze of the trigger, a violent close-quarters explosion ended his life.
A subsequent inquest ruled that Johnny Ace had died playing Russian Roulette.
If no one puts up any proof to the contrary in the next 48 hours, I'm putting this on the article. Sergeant snopake 17:46 23/03/06
Um, amused himself with a game of Russian Roulette? Not the way I heard it, and what's more, that just sounds weird, as if he was 'playing God', and had his own personal game of Russian Roulette going. He tried to kill his girlfriend and her friend. That's no game. The inquest ruled roulette, that's not what happend. Sergeant Snopake 22:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

message: If Ace was indeed playing "Russian roulette" - although thoroughly stupid & irresponsible - can it really be considered a suicide?  Michael David 02:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide? 

message: Did no matter who intend to speak about a way   marked “Alice was a man”? I found some papers in my attic of grandmothers that the other   day one of them was an insertion for a small vinyl disc.   Unfortunately the disc itself was   absent. I would be interested to find this way, as the name resounds really strange for the EC of the artists   other types of music.
§65.196.23.122 23:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost Song?
Talk:Dave Genn

message: Large portions of this article are plagiarized directly from Dave's biography on 5440.com. Flagged for cleanup. -- DaveWF 19:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first 3 paragraphs have now been rewritten.  The remainder still needs to be cleaned up. Davemcarlson 13:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Seems to have been removed. Davemcarlson 13:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripped directly from 5440.com 

message: Blink 182 is on indefinite hiatus right now, and the members are working separately on different projects. I'm assuming this information is false... --24.226.52.97 17:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have been removed. Davemcarlson 13:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blink 182? 
Talk:Takao Kobayashi

message: The 'Why he is famous for P/1997 B1 Kobayashi' section is identical to a section in the page mentioned in the external links. From the updated date on that page, it was copied to wikipedia and not vice versa. I'm going to try rephrasing it using only information from , but as I'm not an astronomer it's difficult to do while being sure that I'm not distorting the information. Feel free to fix any mistakes I make.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelastic (talk • contribs) 08:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation?
Talk:Leaders of Quraish

message: Anyone agreeing that this aritcle does not deserve the "context" tag? --Striver 17:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With all due respect, and not to give you a hard time, but I do think it does still need it.  Frankly, I think the article would benefit from being merged into Quraish where it would be given sufficient context. Esquizombi 18:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciated your input and do not view it as only trying to give me a hard time. Could you elaborate on what parts of the article that are hard to grasp for those unfamilar with the subject, so i can address it? Thanks for your time, and peace --Striver 21:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as I wrote above I think merging into the Quraish article would help give it some of the context it needs.  I'll tag it for a proposed merge into that, but I won't actually merge it.  Some of the questions that could stand to be answered are: were the leaders appointed or were they hereditary, what responsibilities did they have as leaders, did they have certain titles, and so on.  Since there's only a few listed, it might make sense for them to appear in the paragraph rather than list form. Esquizombi 05:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am fine with the merge, if the list get's large we can move it here again. --a.n.o.n.y.m   t 15:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:G-type asteroids

message: Is 1 Ceres a G-type or a C-type.  The "1 Ceres" page and the "G-type" page indicated it is a G-type. The "G-type asteroids" page places 1 Ceres under the C-type secton.  Which is correct? ---- Question dated March 23, 2006 by Tesseract501@aol.com
:It's a G-type. Thank you for pointing out the ambiguity on the G-type asteroid page! Deuar 16:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Deeptrivia

message: I joined wikipedia in May 2005, but didn't take it seriously enough for the first five months, using it as a stress reliever in the midst of the personal problems I was going through, as a means of venting off my frustrations and getting over depression. I think I did too many stupid things, including vandalism and sockpuppetry, on wikipedia during this 5 month period, apart from some good work. In November, though, after getting banned for sockpuppetry, I completely transformed not only my wiki-life, but my real life too. Since then, I've developed a new relationship with wikipedia, which I plan to continue forever. I am eternally thankful to all editors who have trusted me despite the many bad things I did in my early days. deeptrivia (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish you all the best in your wiki-life, as also in the real life. In fact, in to-day's cyber world, digital life has become more significant, and one should treat one's digital existence with respect. I trust that you shall learn lessons from comments of the fellow-wikipedians. I wish you all the best. Please continue with renewed vigor. --Bhadani 13:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Phantasms (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: I personally think this episode contains one of the most hilarious scenes in TNG: Data tells Worf to take care of his cat. Worf's reaction to the cat and to Data's cat feeding and treatment advise just crack me up in ways that should not be healthy. Maybe it's cat-person humour, but I just thought this deserves a mention here, though it probably does not belong in the article. — Ashmodai (talk · contribs) 21:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unquestionably cat-person humor. Especially since I once asked my boyfriend (who is built rather like Worf) to watch my cat and he had a similar reaction. SkepticalGal 20:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most hilarious scene ever? 

message: I recommend 'Short Scenes' be treated like 'Trivia' and the Quotes section moved to Wikiquotes. Somehow. I checked Wikiquotes, TNG, it's all sorts of weird. 
Lots42 09:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The quotes section does not belong here - I am removing. -- Beardo 17:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short Scenes and Quotes 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
to allow Phantasms to be redirected to Phantasm, where multiple phantasm possibilities are listed, as it is unlikely the Star Trek episode is the desired topic. 70.55.90.138 07:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 06:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move Phantasms -> Phantasms (Star Trek: The Next Generation) 

message: Apologies if I've just overlooked an attribution or "used by permission" statement but the bulk of this entry (as of Friday, September 29, 2007, 12:45am) is identical to that shown at http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Phantasms (which is listed as an "external link" in this Wikipedia article). Is this kind of thing acceptable, or is this a violation of a copyright (either a Wikipedia editor has copied this material, or Memory Alpha has copied it from Wikipedia)
-- Willfe 04:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I know many websites copy -from- Wikipedia with Wiki-permission. But that's all I know. Lots42 11:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated/Copied Content?
Talk:Cobham Analytic Solutions

message: The company name, SPARTA, is an acronym.  Does anyone know it stands for?  I saw it once--it was something like Systems Performance and Research Technologies Associates, or some such thing.  All I'm sure of is the "System" part.  Does anyone know the full meaning of the acronym?  It's not on their website, but I think it'd be a valuable addition to the article. — Frecklefoot | Talk 18:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  SPARTA stands for Systems Planning Analysis Research and Technology Associates
Thank you! — Frecklefoot | Talk 00:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronym

message: AlanArthurJenkins removed the comment that "SPARTA is most likely a backronym" stating that it is not a backronym.  How does he know?  Does he have a citation for this?  How else can anyone explain such a contrived company name? If it's not a backronym, we should state it in the article, with an appropriate citation.  Otherwise people will still assume it is a backronym. — Frecklefoot | Talk 19:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, but you seemed unsure ("Probably a backronym") so I made it correct (as I understand the situation).  If you can provide a citation for it 'probably' being a backronym by all means.  Until then there are no citations, and no point speculating. AlanArthurJenkins 20:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Backronym
Talk:Z (disambiguation)

message: What about... Z being the Partition_function_(statistical_mechanics) ? 128.243.220.21 (talk) 17:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: dab pages exist for a reason. There is no need to mention all of the uses on any page other than this one. The argument used earlier to turn this page into a redirect is therefore void.--Chodorkovskiy 18:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Z#Meanings for Z|Disambiguation elsewhere]]
Talk:Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky

message: If he is Polish-Ukrainian shouldn't he be in category Ukrainian and Polish writers if he wasn't ethnic Russian ?
--Molobo 18:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Molobo, your continuing stalking may lead to a severe punishment from admins. Take care, Ghirla -трёп- 18:26, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have 650 vs. 878. Yet the google doesn't perform well for Cyrillic searches: Yandex search yields 2379 items. Please take a note that the current spelling is used by major media outlets of the English speaking world such as The Financial Times, while your search is confined to Polish-language websites, many of which refer to other dudes no doubt. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

text: If you want another edit war, little troll, go ahead. Your delations on talk pages of other users and national notice-boards may get you in trouble, however. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to some other title? I'm not sure which would be the best one, but I'm pretty confident that the current one is plainly wrong. I'd support either his original Polish name (Zygmunt Krzyżanowski) or a proper transliteration of its Russian version (Sigizmund Kzhizhanovskiy). The Krzh thingie seems like a left-over from an improper transliteration to Russian to me, though he might've been using that version as well. //Halibutt 06:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Krzhizhanovsky is the usual translation of Russian Кржижановский. "Рж" (rzh) is the historical Russianization of Polish "rz". Technically you're right about -skiy, but it is common to simplify that to -sky (compare Tchaikovsky, Stravisnky, Dostoevsky, etc., and see WP:RUS). As for whether to use the Polish or the Russian form, I would lean towards keeping the Russian one, since he lived most of his adult life in Russia and Ukraine and wrote in Russian. Lesgles (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:South Carolina Highway 31

message: According to an e-mail between myself and a member of the South Carolina Department of Transportation, I questioned about Interstate 74 signage. He replied,
For all purposes, the Carolina Bays Parkway is an Interstate-standard roadway. --Isipeoria 03:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carolina Bays Parkway is an Interstate-standard road 
Talk:Swap

message: change "vote swapping" link to "vote pairing" since that's where that article has moved.  mentioned that "vote pairing" was formerly called "vote swapping" Snowden666 18:20, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it accurate to say that paging is also called swapping?  My belief is that swapping (at least from my admittedly UNIX-centric POV) is a very specific form of paging, where an entire process is moved from memory to swap.  Is the term also used as a synonym for paging in general?--NapoliRoma (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paging vs. swapping
Talk:Star Wars: Infinities

message: Can you please rewrite this run one sentence:
"In a failed attempt at rescuing Han Solo due to Jabba the Hutt knocking C-3P0's head off of his body, Boba Fett takes the carbonite-encased Solo away, while Jabba, along with the decapitated 3P0, is killed in an explosion that destroys his palace."
Who is killed?
:Jabba and C-3PO, obviously. One would think you didn't even read the article. :) --maru  (talk) contribs 00:26, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence. 

message: Any chance that the same sort of treatment might be given to the prequel trilogy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmorrisey (talk • contribs) 
:No. --maru   (talk)  contribs 05:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuing this series...
Talk:Deion Branch

message: The article contains no citations, and this fact becomes more important when the articles starts writing things such "Branch wanted" and "Branch points to" and further still that it makes subjective remarks such as "put him in the middle of receivers of his rank".  While mostly a good article, the lack of citations do stick out, and do not provide a way for the reader to get more indepth on the issue. 74.69.213.90 15:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for 2006 Contract Issues 
Talk:Noah Gordon (novelist)

message: I recently ran across the Wikipedia term "Coat Rack" and I'm wondering if that applies to this article. It gives his date and place of birth, and his profession. The rest is a list of his works and sounds like advertising from his publisher. I came to Wikipedia because Bookbub offered to sell me his Dr. Robert Cole Trilogy and included this review: “ 'Gordon writes with the skill and patience of a good doctor… Powerful' (The New York Times Book Review)". I'm a doctor and I'd like to know if he really is a doctor and if so, which specialty. Also more about his connection with Barcelona, where his publisher is located, and if there is any controversy about him.
Ssw0213 (talk) 20:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the great feedback! This is a WP:Stub, so the content is not very well developed. In general, we recommend expanding the article, if you find more Verifiable content that ought to be included in the article. Sadads (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a coat rack?