lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
MediaWiki talk:Newpageletter

message: This discussion started on 24.08.2004 by proposing a yellow icon (image not shown here) to indicate new pages in the recent changes view. The discussion and opinion polls spawned off into three different ones and I (the proposer) decided today to move all in my opinion minor discussions to a secondary page (archived discussions until 30.08.2004) in order to concentrate on the main question: --Nyxos (Talk) 01:43, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: It appears that there was a consensus against any of the other two options.   — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 00:33, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: # Psychobabble. Scanning new articles more easily = good.
# Angela
# Phil | Talk—I like it, it's simple and makes the least possible change. I've even found a simpler version, see above
#:Important remark: for server bandwidth reasons, the tag with the least number of bytes should be finally chosen - I had a chat with TimWi about this aspect. --Nyxos (Talk) 16:00, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''For''' (= highlighted <b style="background:yellow">N</b>)

message: Use "N" without giving newarticle-mark any properties in default css, as Tarquin suggested. Yath 06:07, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be N. Jamesday 16:02, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  For css class only 

message: Might I suggest that the two options each be activated for a brief test period, say 24 hrs each? That would enable us to see how they look in context; a "don't panic; only a test" note could be appended to the current poll announcement. It'd also get more people over here to vote. –Hajor 00:54, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: How about a test period?

message: * Please do not add alternative proposals here. --Nyxos (Talk) 14:05, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternatives and older discussions 

message: Heads up: to adjust your CSS page to make the yellow highlighting come back, you need to add:
 .newpage {background: #FFFF00;}
Adjust the colour to taste.
HTH HAND --Phil | Talk 08:20, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
:And I was wondering why it disappeared randomly when I returned after my wikibreak. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 02:21, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now in a Span
Talk:Suzy Bogguss

message: There is more info needed on tracks!
Such as: "No Good Way To Go"
Please cite this and get it from her website, Amazon and Last.fm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.188.193.64 (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  more info on tracks needed! 

message: During her hiatus, the climate of country music had changed considerably, with more pop-oriented female singers such as Martina McBride, Faith Hill, Sara Evans and Shania Twain dominating the charts. Bogguss's traditional, straightforward style failed to connect with younger listeners, and the record yielded disappointing sales.
I found this particularly ironic, since I started liking country music largely because of older Suzy Bogguss songs like "Outbound Plane" with the heavy use on syncopation and piano and downplayed guitar that was a-typical of country music at the time.  Tiger-Heli (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Style 

message: To make sure we follow WP:BLP and WP:V (since the article has been tagged for over 5 years), I am taking an initiative to add sourced material from other reliable, third-party sources (i.e. Chicago Tribune, Associated Press, Los Angeles Times). I will add more as I go along. Please let me know if there are any issues here. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Paris District High School

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 27 to May 3 2004, although clear consensus was not reached the article was amended since listing and all votes since amendment were to keep.  Discussion:
* Delete. Just another school, which Wikipedia is not a repository of. If something notable happens there, we can keep it. Until then, nix. —Frecklefoot 19:14, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. Locally notable. Everyking 19:31, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: I removed the comment about crime, since it was to vague, and not backed up.  I haven't a clue which schools have gangs.  I don't want to imply it's common elsewhere in Ontario (without proof).  Anyway, that can go in another article.    --rob 10:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  updated mention; removed crime/drug thing 

message: Can someone who knows a little bit more about the school add the  to this?  Thanks!  tiZom(2¢) 22:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:John Kerry/Archive 3

message: : Suggestion to anyone - suggest someone works to publish/research Forbes family wealth (wills, estate tax, published trusts, etc.). Publish excerpts here on talk page. -Anon1453
:: I second that. I have been unable to locate the source for the claim that Kerry's mother inherited so many millions of dollars. I also find it biased and inaccurate to say what the amount would mean in 2003's dollars. If the reader is looking at the entry in 2010, it will be useless to know what the amount meant in 2003.  This has clearly been put in the entry to make it seem like a lot more than it was.
:::Yeah, I kinda thought so as well, but I was catching so much flak for other thinks at the time I didn't want to comment. I'd be very interested in seeing some documentation for these claims. Bkonrad | Talk 00:23, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbes family wealth 

message: Dear Bkonrad. My compliments on partly-thoughtful rewrite. I want Forbes cousins IN Forbes section. But as sop, in your language, I will include Brice only, leaving other for Forbes page. But if this compromise is not acceptable, then 1 2 3 4 I declare an edit war. Thank you and regards, Anon1453
:Your recent edits are quite reasonable. Perhaps not exactly how I would have phrased things, but I guess that's how we reach NPOV. Re: Lalonde, he is also specifically mentioned in the Childhood Years section. I don't see it neccessary to include him in the Family History section as well. But I'm not going touch it for now. Peace out. Bkonrad | Talk 13:52, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope GBWR's recent deletion doesn't upset the compromise that seemed to satisfy anon. I'll gladly trade a redundant sentence about Lalonde for endless edit wars. Bkonrad | Talk 22:06, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You do not love your country, appeaser 8^p Get-back-world-respect 23:10, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brice Lalonde
Talk:North Ward School (Paris, Ontario)

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 27 to May 3 2004, consensus was not reached.  Discussion:
*Delete. Just another school.  Getting a bomb threat doesn't make it notable. —Frecklefoot 20:07, Apr 27, 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. It already boasts an impressive amount of detail. Everyking 20:46, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD

message: I've listed the school at WP:EiC#Cleanup needed.  --Stephane Charette 12:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:August Heinrich Hoffmann von Fallersleben

message: think "von Fallersleben" means "from Fallersleben" was not part of his name, indicating nobility, only indicating his place of birth. --Spacey 21:00, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: that´s correct, and Hoffmann is a very common name in germany, so he wanted to separate from other Hoffmanns Iwantedthedudebutitwasgone 02:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: von Fallersleben
Talk:Ambrose Burnside

message: Burnside's imposition of illegal military rule under General Order No. 38 warrants a section on controversy, does it not?119.224.13.116 (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Order No. 38 
Talk:Pack Up the Cats

message: I've seen someone mention elsewhere that another version of this album exists with a second disc and am wondering if this is true or not and if so, what is the second disc comprised of? --71.156.85.133 02:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two versions of this album? 

message: This is a pretty remarkable album, one that the band was striving towards and whose template they've followed ever since. Its got recurring themes (failure, growing up, uprooting oneself) and even recurring motifs (the main riff from Cool Magnet is played at the end of Laminate Man, a small reprise of All The Kids are Right is played, with different lyrics on Lead Pipe Cinch). I was wondering if there should be a section on the themes covered in this album, and how this plays like a concept album a la Pink Floyd albums. What does everyone think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.191.149 (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more detail? 

message: I've always thought of this as a concept album.  Lyrically it seems to be very tied together, even if the theme isn't entirely obvious.  Seems to be about growing up, moving out, feeling alienated, w/e.
Lyrics aside, musically it is definitely a concept record.  I don't think there is a single break on the album, and many tracks appear twice on the album.  All the Kids are Right = Lead Pipe Cinch.  Lucky = Lucky time.  Plus the riff from Cool Magnet comes back at the end of Laminate Man.  
How do you guys feel about bringing this up in the article? Ckolar612 (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept Album?
Talk:Opisometer

message: Urm .. help!  I can't find any pages which could reasonably link to this one.  I'm sure there must be at least a "list of measuring devices" or similar out there.  This is the sort of article which is handy to find in an encyclopedia, here else would you find what one was?  It surely doesn't deserve to be an orphan in the big bad wikiworld.  TB 23:14, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've found many eBay items which are clearly opisometers, but are being called meilographs, and I've found this page at the University of Guelph from which I get "You will also require a meilograph, or map measurer, in order to complete some quizzes and assignments". Neither are totally formal, but I think are enough to justify the addition of the term. By the way the two words opisometer and meilograph are currently a Googlewhack, although not for long... --Malcohol 10:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Western New Guinea

message: The article says:
"The Act of Free Choice ... was truly the opinion of the West Papuan people without any external intervention."
This statement has no citation and seems to be in heavy dispute. For instance the British newspaper The Guardian calls the referendum:
"a UN-sanctioned but discredited ballot ... in which barely 1,000 West Papuan representatives selected by Indonesia cast votes under threat of violence."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/06/jeremy-corbyn-on-west-papua-uk-labour-leader-calls-for-independence-vote
I understand that a statement isn't removed just because it has no citation, but doesn't this need to be looked at again?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.154.221 (talk) 19:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contentious info on independence referendum presented as fact 

message: The title "Western New Guinea" as oppose to its legal "West New Guinea" English name, "Irian Jaya" common name from 1973 to 2001, or "West Papua" common English name since 2002 is a Wikipedia invention by editors driven by political agenda and edit war instead of objectivity. BOTH the Indonesian and Netherlands governments used "West New Guinea" in their joint international agreement, https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20437/volume-437-I-6311-English.pdf 
Daeron (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been going through the contemporary sources (newspapers and then secondary analyses): prior to around 1962 'West New Guinea' was the dominant usage in English, occasionally 'Dutch New Guinea' or 'Netherlands New Guinea'. No one used 'Western New Guinea' as the name of the region. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s Indonesian sources refer to 'Irian Barat' (West Irian), and some use 'Irian' to refer to the whole island. Only during the Suharto period, and particularly after 1969, does 'Irian Jaya' seem to have come into general usage. The Indonesian use of 'Papua'/'West Papua' comes after 1998 (but the former is confusing since it could also refer to part of PNG). Adrian Vickers (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official English name 

message: Before 1950 the Republic of Indonesia was a constituent of the United States of Indonesia, to which the Netherlands handed over Dutch East Indies in 1949. Dutch New Guinea remained Dutch until the early 1960s. The line "" is therefore not entirely accurate. 112.120.39.24 (talk) 09:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1945?
Talk:Airstrip One

message: :But also accurately predicted the United Kingdom's subsequent isolation from the mainstream of European politics and subordination to the interests of the United States. 
For the next 30 years, anyway, which is pretty good in comparison with the novel's other views of the future. 
On the other hand, Britain did join the European Common Market in the 70s and has proceeded apace with EU accession, although a bit slowly.
Article needs a bit of expansion.Ellsworth 23:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Is it ever indicated that Airstrip One includes Ireland? I always imagined that Ireland would be Airstrip Two. -- 22:18, 21 September 2005 User:Ben-w
:Orwell doesn't say anything about Ireland in chapter 3 (what he does say is rather vague geographically). AnonMoos (talk) 08:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ireland

message: Back in the Greenham Common days of the 1980's, writers who supported the protesters sometimes used "Airstrip One" as an anti-US metaphor... AnonMoos (talk) 08:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural references

message: Why is it a prolem that this article cites a single source? 208.79.94.252 (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Single Source
Talk:List of New Zealand place name etymologies

message: This will be a very long list if we get stuck in! But I don't recommend that we split it into regions, because many names (eg Tasman and Waipu) are used all over the place. We might, however, add a link where any region or town gets its own list.
This originated from List of etymologies of country subdivision names, which should be checked from time to time to see if anything useful has been addedseveral regions were missing when this was set up.
Some countries have street name lists. That's a possibility here, but apply the same caution as in my first paragraph.
: Robin Patterson 00:25, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rakiuraraki: sky, ura: redthought to be a reference to the Aurora Australis and unusual sunsets at these latitude
In common maori, the sky is "rangi" not "raki" so either that name comes from a special dialect of maori in which the ancient ng would have evoluted in K (like in north marquesan :sky = 'aki; south marquesan= 'ani) either the translation is wrong ? stefjourdan@caramail.com (user motunono in french wikipedia)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.190.18 (talk) 21:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Raki is "rangi" in the southern Māori dialect, and yes, in that dialect 'ng' has evoluted in K. Kahuroa 23:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rakiura 
Talk:Prince Edward of Saxe-Weimar

message: A few questions: What is meant by "honourary peerage"? It doesn't really make sense. Was he really on the  Privy Council, and if so, why is he not in our list of historical members? I have (I hope) clarified some matters regarding his wife. -- Nunh-huh 00:43, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Both points now resolved. Dormskirk (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sandra Bullock

message: Is she not a German-American actress? Since she has both U.S. and German citizenship. Lachiquilladelosandes (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: The article currently says: “After producing the romantic comedy Kate & Leopold (2001), Bullock starred in the psychological thriller Murder by Numbers (2002) as a seasoned homicide detective.” – but Sandra Bullock didn’t produce Kate & Leopold? Her IMDb page has no producing credits between Miss Congeniality and Murder by Numbers, so what is this line supposed to be? Kokoshneta (talk) 17:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Kokoshneta, I can't find any sources that connect Bullock to Kate & Leopold. The mention was added to the article several years ago. I've removed it. Schazjmd (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  After producing Kate & Leopold? 

message: Change the link of Footnote/Source 122 - https://www.kvue.com/story/life/food/2015/09/08/sandra-bullocks-popular-austin-bistro-closing-its-doors/71885108/ - to austin.culturemap.com/news/restaurants-bars/09-08-15-bess-bistro-closing-sandra-bullock-west-sixth-september-2015/. The current link is dead and the austin.culturemap.com one gives the same information. 2601:2C5:680:70B0:8933:67BC:1069:55F1 (talk) 03:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cuturemap is cited as the original source in the archived version of kvue. M.Bitton (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2023 

message: She graduated with a BFA not an MFA so the infobox should be corrected... 74.12.2.239 (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems you're correct, as the article's body says it was a BFA, and at least one source besides the cited one with a paywall agrees: . I've changed it. Largoplazo (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BFA not MFA
Talk:North American X-15

message: " The only Navy pilot in the X-15 program never took the aircraft above the requisite 50 mile (80 km) altitude and thus never earned astronaut wings.[3][4]"
Neil Armstrong, first man on the moon, is the navy pilot mentioned. It is erroneous to say that he "never earned astronaut wings".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.19.97.4 (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It means he never earned them in the X-15. - BilCat (talk) 17:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It also isn't referring to Neil Armstrong, a member of NASA at the time, but Forrest S. Petersen. Buffs (talk) 22:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navy pilot never earned astronaut wings 

message: you guys should add duration of/distance covered by the flights at record speed if known...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:67c:10ec:578f:8000::39 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  duration of/distance covered by the flights at record speed

message: On YouTube, there is a documentary that was clearly produced in close co-ordination with the USAF, NASA and North American. During this documentary, footage is shown of the "big" XLR99 engine undergoing a ground test, attached to plane 66672, being controlled by Scott Crossfield. After an engine shutdown, he restarts the engine, and the entire rear half of the plane explodes. It appears this happened on 6-8-60 (I'm guessing it's an American date, so June 8th 1960?). There is an interview with Crossfield where he shows pictures of the wreckage, and explains that the failure was caused by the hydrogen peroxide tank being smashed open by the ammonia tank, which had failed due to over-pressure; the over-pressure should have been prevented by the main valve turning off when commanded, but it was found to likely have been frozen in the full-open position. Additionally, there was an emergency vent valve that should also have blown to relieve the pressure, but it too was faulty. He specifically says "A frozen regulator, a faulty relief valve, and a high back pressure relief system had gotten together, and we had wrecked an airplane" (emphasis mine).
There doesn't seem to be any mention of this anywhere in the article, which I found surprising considering that it appears to have caused extensive damage, if not an outright loss, of the plane numbered 66672. The article lists this as plane #3, the same plane that later killed Michael J. Adams. So was this plane actually repaired, or did they re-use the plane number? Unfortunately the documentary doesn't have enough detail or any credits/title sequences to figure out who produced it, and without knowing this I don't think it can be used as a citation to add this info to the article.
FYI, one of the photos has an ID number on it of 240-861-30H -- it might be possible to do a FOIA request or similar to get a copy of this photo to add to the article, which may also lead to more info about the accident and the report(s) surrounding it, if any. Thoughts?  MrAureliusRTalk! 12:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plane 66672 Blown Up?
Talk:Edward Everett Hale

message: I believe this is a more accurate representation of the quote found in the article:
"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do. What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of God, I will do."
I like that better too, but can you reference it? And for that matter, can we reference the one already in the article? Because I've seen it phrased a little differently at the end elsewhere on the internet.
And on a side note, I don't think this article should be rated B class...Killiondude (talk) 01:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote
Talk:Social change

message: Hello everyone, my name is Paul Joaseus, and I am doing an assignment for my sociology class. It basically involves me becoming one of you and editing a Wikipedia page. My goal is to add more content to this page and I'd appreciate any critique or help that you'd be willing to offer me. Thanks and have a nice day. Reptarlightyear (talk) 01:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class assignment 

message: The External Links lead to a website of an Indian NGO. The pages on that site are not relevant to the article on social change. Suggest deletion. H. Peston (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to NGO India? 

message: Social Investment is tangible and/or intangible resource inputs in any social institution, social group and a society that can bring about a social change.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarkar Sagi (talk • contribs) 13:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Investment 

message: The second paragraph in the Global Demographic Shifts section is poorly written and lacks citations.
It needs to be either revised or removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenniBraun (talk • contribs) 04:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph in need of revision