Talk:Rose Revolution

message: Maybe if Orange Revolution is to be mentioned, then Velvet Revolution should also be mentioned.
many of the georgians were stupid.
This page could really use an image or two of protesters like at Orange Revolution.--Pharos 00:13, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what I was thinking -- Joolz 14:22, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new era is said to have begun in Georgia after the Rose Revolution. While the West considers the Rose Revolution a move towards democracy, its opponents including several Russian and pro-Russian politicians claim the revolution to be a "made-in-America coup" emphasizing the role of the Open Society Institute of George Soros in financing the Georgian opposition. 
Several reforms were launched by a new government and strong anti-corruption measures were established. Georgia’s foreign policy was proclaimed strongly pro-Western. However, some concerns have been made by Georgian opposition regarding Saakashvili’s authoritarian tendencies. 
Post-revolution, the authorities are continuing to demonstrate a clear resolve to build a stable and modern European democracy and to better integrate the country into European and Euro-Atlantic structures. The Georgian government hopes to join SATURN by 2008 and start accession talks with the Goerge Bush afterwards. The post-revolutionary euphoria has given way to more pragmatism; the hasty, sometimes even chaotic initial approach to reforms is very gradually being replaced by a clearer focus on priorities and by a better-defined strategy. However, most reforms are still at the very beginning and major challenges still lie ahead. The ambitious work which has been undertaken in order to bring legislation in line with European standards still has to produce concrete results in most areas. The implementation of reforms will be just as important and the authorities will have to demonstrate, at every step, that their solutions in overcoming the inevitable problems and obstacles along the way, fully abide by the principles of democracy, rule of law and respect for human rights. 
Three years after coming into power, the Georgian authorities still enjoy high popular support and benefit from a broad public consensus over the objectives and goals of the democratic transition. The people's trust must not be betrayed. In a country which is emerging from decades of political hypocrisy and manipulation, any failure to deliver on promised reforms can easily result in mistrust and questioning of these same reforms, especially by the most heavily affected layers of the population. The authorities cannot afford any unnecessary delays and obstacles which could be caused by nostalgic or revengeful attitudes; they should therefore be careful to always match words and deeds and to be open to dialogue and criticism. According to Saakashvili, full normalization of the situation in Georgia is impossible without regaining control over the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. President Saakashvili made some efforts to push forward his initiative, but at the same time real progress has not been achieved on the ground and in the ongoing negotiations, because of lack of commitment from Russia to the territorial integrity of Georgia. 
===Political liberalization===
President Bush visited Georgia on May 9–May 10 2005, and praised its “rose revolution” for "inspiring democratic reformers" and freedom "from the Black Sea to the Caspian and to the Persian Gulf and beyond". President Saakashvili hailed the Bush visit as marking "final confirmation that Georgia is an independent country whose borders and territory are inviolable", and stressed that the U.S.-Georgian "partnership" ultimately was based on "our shared belief in freedom", and was the reason that Georgia had sent troops to Iraq to end "enslavement" there.
2006 has been a time of two groundbreaking elections in Georgia.  Just one month ago, Georgia held its first-ever local self government elections.  And the results demonstrated overwhelming public support for Georgia’s reform agenda.  All Georgia took pride in that fact that these elections were held in a free, fair and competitive manner, and were universally praised for their quality and inclusiveness by domestic and international observers alike.  In fact, turnout figures for these elections were higher than for previous parliamentary polls, showing strong public interest and participation.  
According to OSCE and COE election observers, the during local elections of October 5, 2006 fundamental freedoms were generally respected, but the use of administrative resources appeared to be a problem. They praised the election as marking a new phase of democratization, because the city councils are empowered to elect mayors who had been previously appointed by the president (the reforms fall short of direct elections of mayors). 
For the first time since independence, Georgian citizens chose their local executives in October’s local elections.  The polls took place after an extensive reform that reduced the number of local councils from some 1,000 to 69 "self-government bodies", which manage their own affairs and budgets.  A clear budgetary formula has been put in place in order to safeguard their financial independence. 
Secondly, in an unprecedented exercise of local democracy, in June 2006 parents and teachers throughout Georgia elected school boards that will manage all of the country’s public schools.  The school boards are designed to become one of the cornerstones of our education reform and function as an important mechanism for participatory democracy. The boards appoint school directors, approve budgets, and increase the accountability of the system at large. In an unprecedented expression of grassroots democracy, turnout in these elections was very high. 
===Media and freedom of expression===
Freedom of speech and expression is one the most critical realms in which legislative progress is both tangible and identifiable. 
A new Law on Freedom of Speech and Expression, passed in June 2004, has been cited as being one of the most liberal laws in all of Europe.  The law guarantees a long list of journalistic freedoms.  Highlights of the law include the effective decriminalization of defamation, a specific distinction between public and private citizens in libel proceedings, and the protection of publications from libel suits, so long as the publisher can prove that he or she took reasonable measures to ensure accuracy. Thus, the burden of proof has been reversed and rests on the plaintiff.  Under the new Law, only owners of media outlets can be held liable in court, not individual journalists. The Law on Freedom of Speech and Expression protects journalists not only from the state but also from private persons or entities. Journalists can take editors or owners to court in cases of intimidation or unlawful pressure. 
Courts, as well as investigators and prosecutors, can no longer require journalists to disclose their sources, and the media can no longer be held liable for disclosing lawfully obtained state secrets in the press. Moreover, the Government of Georgia has offered tax benefits to media entities. Finally, the Government of Georgia abolished state-controlled television and created a vibrant Public Broadcasting entity managed by a board of Georgian citizens, the first of its kind in the former Soviet Union.
===Judicial reforms===
With the active participation and assistance of local NGOs, as well as a broad range of international institutions led primarily by the EU, the Government of Georgia created a comprehensive plan for judicial reform. This is one of the most important reforms to date, as it will determine the success of our democratic cause as well as improve the investment climate. 
This reform package is increasing the accountability and efficiency of the legal system. The number of pre-trial detentions in lower courts, and convictions in both appellate and cassation courts have decreased markedly. Notably, use of bail during the pre-trial period has increased up to fifty percent. In 2004, the Parliament introduced trials by jury into the Georgian constitution, reviving juries first established by the Democratic Republic of Georgia in 1919—, nd the new Criminal Procedures Code, which will go into effect in 2007, will incorporate the jury process as an essential component of criminal trials. In one of the most recent changes, out of court statements can no longer be taken as evidence during trials. This reduces possibilities for extorting testimonies through torture and ill-treatment. 
Concrete steps have been undertaken to liberalize criminal procedure. In reforming the criminal justice system, Western legal principles – such as the right to an adversarial trial and a prohibition on the use of illegally obtained evidence in court – have been adapted and adopted.  A system of plea-bargaining has been introduced as a tool for fighting corruption and organized crime as well as human rights abuses.  A comprehensive package of legislation on witness protection has been passed by the Georgian Parliament. In addition, the Georgian Parliament ratified the Second Optional Protocol of the UN Convention Against Torture. The convention will effectively become operational starting from 2007. 
Pending on-going amendments to the Georgian constitution, judges will be appointed by the High Council of Justice and not the president. As well, judges will comprise more than half of the High Council of Justice in line with the European Charter on Judicial Status. The Government of Georgia also has designed a new transparent selection system for the High Council of Justice, introduced magistrate judges to deal with lower offenses, raised the salaries of judges, undertaken new educational measures to encourage proper legal study, and created a statute that allows judges to hold unruly court actors in contempt. The new Law on Judicial Discipline, which came into effect in 2006, sets out explicit procedures for disciplining dishonest judges. 
Before the Rose Revolution, independence of the judiciary was so weak that in almost all cases – whether criminal, administrative, or civil – the state party prevailed.  With the recent changes, the imbalance has been significantly remedied to the benefit of private parties. However, the relatively low frequency of acquittals in criminal cases remains a problem. This, also, is expected to change with the planned introduction of jury trials. 
Since 2004, government statistics and independent reviews have indicated that professionalism and transparency in Georgia’s judiciary are improving.  The occurrence of pre-trial detentions for defendants has decreased; the judiciary approved eighty-eight percent of motions for detention in 2003, compared to seventy-nine percent in 2005 and sixty-four percent in the first quarter of 2006.  The trends indicate that these figures will likely continue to drop.  The number of acquittals in lower courts doubled between 2004 and 2005. 
 
Over the course of 2006:
*Convictions in Appellate courts decreased to thirty percent
*Appeals ruled in favor of the prosecution in Appellate courts decreased to forty-seven percent;
*Convictions in Cassation courts decreased to forty percent (when the defendant appealed to Appeals courts)
*Out of seventy-nine cassation claims on taxation disputes, forty-eight were resolved in favor of private parties
*Appeals ruled in favor of the prosecution in Cassation courts decreased to ten percent.
Among 620 cassation claims heard at the Chamber for Administrative and Other Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia, January–September 2006:
*280 appeals were brought by administrative bodies
*340 appeals were brought by natural persons and legal entities
*269 cases were resolved in favor of administrative bodies
*306 cases were resolved in favor of natural persons and legal entities
*Eight cases were resolved through mediation
*105 cases were returned to the court of the first instance for rehearing. Among them, thirty cases were resolved in favor of administrative bodies, eighty-five in favor of natural persons and legal entities. 
===A new police force and prison reforms===
In one of its most critical initiatives, the Government of Georgia undertook a comprehensive reform plan in 2004 that revamped, retrained, and re-equipped Georgia’s police force. Salaries were raised tenfold and open, merit-based competitions were established for hiring new officers. Corruption fell dramatically and public confidence in the police force soared; according to a recent poll conducted by Gallup and sponsored by the International Republican Institute (IRI), as of April 2006, seventy percent of the population has confidence in the new police force as opposed to five percent before the Rose Revolution. 
In the prison system, the Government of Georgia is currently instituting large-scale reforms designed to bring an end to human rights abuses and combat the prevalence of organized crime. A complete overhaul of all prison facilities, to bring them into compliance with international standards, has begun; in 2006, the Government of Georgia built two new prisons that meet rigorous international standards. Meanwhile, known organized crime leaders, will be held in separate facilities to reduce their ability to manipulate the system. With the ongoing prisons construction, problem of overcrowding will be completely solved for inmates in pre-trial detention in 2007. 
===International human-rights standards===
The Parliament has amended Georgia's Criminal Code by redefining torture and inhumane treatment to comply with international human rights standards. The Criminal Procedures Code ensures that courts void unjust plea agreements that violate the right to due process. The Ministry of Internal Affairs has issued several regulations to combat malpractice and abuse within the Ministry. One such protocol increases transparency by demanding the establishment of independent monitoring mechanisms, which fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry’s newly created Department of Human Rights and Monitoring. 
 
===Anti-corruption and business-improvement measures===
In 2005, the Government of Georgia created the Anti-Corruption Strategy and Action Plan, which organized the fight against corruption and organized crime. The new Law on Organized Crime criminalizes membership in known organized crime groups. As a result of these efforts, corruption has decreased visibly and significantly. According to IRI polls, fifty-five percent of the population believes that corruption in ordinary people's lives has fallen since the Rose Revolution.
Much attention was paid to the liberalization and deregulation of the business environment. More than ninety percent of existing license requirements have been abolished, while the remaining licensing has been streamlined. As a result, businesses spend less time on interaction with the state bureaucracy. This development, coupled with the crackdown on corruption as well as with internal and external monitoring, reduces risks for corruption. 
The decisive progress made by Georgia in its effort to reduce corruption, improve administration, and liberalize the business environment were accordingly reflected in the World Bank’s 2006 report Doing Business. Georgia was recognized as the number-one reformer in the world, and rose seventy-five places in a year – from 112th to 37th in the world – with regard to business attractiveness. The new Government of Georgia has made concrete progress towards meeting international standards not only in terms of political governance, with its anti-crime and -corruption drives, but also in terms of economic modernization. For example, over these three years, the Government of Georgia has cut red tape for businesses, overhauled the tax code, and abolished most customs duties. These measures have allowed many businesses to move out of the shadow and into the formal economy, resulting in a significant increase in government revenue, helping to reduce the budget deficit to a manageable level.
 
===Expansion of the rights of minorities===
A framework convention on minority rights will reaffirm the importance of minority rights in Georgia, a country that is home to a diverse multiplicity of religious groups and ethnic minorities. New legislation provides religious organizations with more comprehensive protection and allows them to register as legal entities. The President launched the National Integration and Tolerance Council, a group of officials and civil society representatives that evaluate the status of minority groups in Georgia and reports directly to the President and elaborates a comprehensive tolerance and integration strategy and action plan. 
Furthermore, the Government of Georgia has allocated funds for road construction and improved communications infrastructure to increase the mobility of Georgia’s ethnic minorities, many of which are effectively segregated from the rest of the country. The Georgian Public Broadcaster has begun transmitting programs in the Azerbaijani and Armenian languages, and the Parliament has elaborated draft legislation to reinstate property to the victims of the conflict in South Ossetia. 
The Government of Georgia has instituted affirmative action programs in order to integrate Georgia’s national minorities and give them proper access to education, public procurement as well as civil service. The Zurab Zhvania School of Public Administration, opened recently in Kutaisi, prepares young leaders from Georgia’s ethnic minorities for careers in public service. The planned construction of a 120 million U.S. dollar road linking Tbilisi and minority areas in the south of the country as well as the construction of the Kars-Akhalkalaki railway will emerge as major impetus for the economic integration of minority areas into mainstream Georgian life. 
 
===Checks and balances===
Forthcoming constitutional changes will delegate some of the powers of the President to different branches of the government. Under the anticipated amendments, the High Council of Justice, rather than the President, will possess the authority to appoint judges. Furthermore, if the President dissolves Parliament two times during one term, an immediate presidential election will be scheduled. The Supreme Council of the Adjaran Autonomous Republic will also adopt a new constitution that will re-examine the autonomy’s competencies. 
The Parliament and the Executive Branch have implemented a number of measures to increase the power and influence of Georgia’s Parliament in the governance process. Parliament now exercises the authority to monitor the defense and security sector as well as law enforcement structures. The Parliament also now holds final approval power for candidates appointed to independent regulatory bodies.
The strengthening of checks and balances is directly linked with the recent local government reform, under which the President no longer appoints local executives such as mayors and governors. 
===Education system===
To combat corruption and favoritism in education, Georgia adopted a standardized, universal system of national examinations that now forms the basis for university admissions. Moreover, all universities will create self-governing bodies that will not be vulnerable to outside interference. 
The reform also establishes a system of competitive scientific grants and educational vouchers for parents and students. More competition will inevitably increase the quality of education and improve Georgia’s position in the globalized world economy. Additionally, the reform will effectively integrate education and research, on one hand, and orient both of them to the market and the public, on the other. The new system also gives more choices to students, as schools and universities now compete for them.  Finally, the Deer Leap Program will bring computers and Internet access to all of Georgia’s more than 3,000 schools.
 
===National security===
In the security sector, Georgia’s primary foreign policy goal is NATO membership. The Government of Georgia has revamped the armed forces and created a new military strategy to bring Georgia's security sector up to NATO standards. Moreover, civilians—not military officers—control the Ministry of Defense. Civilian-run structures are responsible for policy issues, financial management, and international affairs.
A steady increase in defense spending, which some have interpreted as a sign of growing militarism, is instead evidence that Georgia has finally embarked upon the task of building a modern army. It is also important to note that military spending is kept in line with NATO standards of constituting at least two percent of GDP. 
===Civil society===
A growing civil society continues to strengthen Georgia’s democracy. Indeed, civil society is actively involved in the current reform process, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) continuously monitor Georgia’s elections and prisons. The Government of Georgia incorporates the recommendations of NGOs in its policy initiatives. Additionally, financial benefits for NGOs are included in Georgia's new tax code. As a result, up to three million GEL has been spent on charities by private companies. Local governments also promote neighborhood associations through matching funds. 
===Economic liberalization===
Although Georgia's Rose Revolution occurred only three years ago, many positive results are already visible, especially as concern foreign investment and the overall perception of the country among multinational policymaking bodies. The new government has made concrete progress towards meeting international standards not only in terms of political governance, such as in its anti-crime and -corruption drive, but in terms of economic modernization. 
Georgia’s overall economic performance in 2006 continues to be strong despite the external shock associated with Russia’s economic embargo. Economic growth has been hindered by the loss of Russian export markets, but remains robust. Preliminary indications are that real GDP growth could be about 8 percent for 2006.
Keeping a quick pace of reform has resulted in double-digit economic growth for a second year in a row, despite immense external pressure. Georgia’s macroeconomic picture is now quite favorable, characterized by good fiscal performance, a stable currency, growing consumer spending together with low levels of personal debt, robust government investment in infrastructure, and a notable increase in activity by foreign investors.  Up to 100,000 jobs have been created this year, while the number of people living below poverty line has declined by six percent.  Several key reforms implemented this year, including further reduction of institutional corruption, simplification of licensing, liberalization of the labor market, and improvement of property rights and contract enforcement have established excellent prospects for better performance during the forthcoming year.
Since 2004, the Georgian government has undertaken institutional reforms including the restructuring and downsizing of government ministries, cut red tape for businesses, overhauled the tax code and abolished most customs duties, privatization of large state-owned entities as well as forty-five percent of remaining state-owned land (fifty-five percent of agricultural land was given to the farmers for private ownership free of charge in 1992), payroll increases for public servants, anti-corruption measures, improvements in tax and fiscal administration, licensing reforms, deregulation, customs reform, and other efforts to reduce opportunities for corruption and make it easier to do business in Georgia.
Based on overall performance and the Georgian government’s strong political commitment to structural changes, Georgia received its first sovereign credit rating in late 2005 from Standard and Poors: B+ long-term, and B short-term rating. Other studies and rankings done by international organizations such as the International Financial Corporation, World Bank/EBRD, and the Heritage Foundation have noted significant improvements in democracy, governance, and the business climate.
In 2006 Gallup Corruption Index, ranking 101 countries on  perceptions of corruption in business and government, Georgia tied for thirty-first, with a score of sixty-eight. This progress has been noted by such institutions as the EBRD and the World Bank, which recently cited Georgia as having achieved the largest reduction in corruption among all transition countries from 2002 to 2005.
Georgia saw the largest reduction in corruption among all transition countries from 2002 to 2005, says a World Bank  report. "Anticorruption in Transition 3 — Who is Succeeding and Why?" is a detailed report of studies examining the patterns and trends in corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: "Among countries showing the most dramatic improvements are Georgia and the Slovak Republic, where committed leaders are implementing strong programs of economic and institutional reform and firm-level bribery has fallen substantially", the World Bank report reads. "The most striking improvements from 2002 to 2005 were in Georgia where the percentage of firms reporting that bribery of tax officials was frequent fell from 44 percent to 11 percent in these three years.”  The report says that major improvements are also observed in customs-related bribery in Georgia. The firms in the survey report less frequent bribery in the courts then three years ago in a few countries, including in Georgia, Romania and the Slovak Republic, according to the WB report. These measures have encouraged many businesses out of the shadows and into the formal economy, resulting in significant rises in government revenue and helping to reduce the budget deficit to a manageable level. 
The microeconomic picture shows slow progress. Georgia must cope with increased unemployment caused by state layoffs, deep social spending needs, and an economy made uncompetitive by years of neglect and poor policy. Physical infrastructure is badly outdated and deteriorated after more than a decade of neglect and corrupt management by the previous government. These substantial needs represent both an opportunity and an impediment to investment and growth. Although Georgia’s financial sector is growing well and is considered generally healthy, access to credit for consumers is still limited, and hampered further by weak external liquidity of the banking sector. Average lending rate in 2005 was 17.9, comparative to 4.0 in EU.
Real GDP growth in 2005 was 9.3%, up from 6.2% in 2004 and 8% in 2003. However, although nominal GDP per capita increased from USD 876.9 in 2003, but is still remains low at about 1599 USD in 2006. Inflation for 2005 was about 6%. The growth is visible in financial intermediation – 56.7 %, transport and storage – 37.7 %, construction - 25.9 %, mining - 23.9 %, manufacturing - 20.1 %, communications – 19.5 %, trade and repair services – 13.8 %, real estate, renting and business activities – 11.4 %; trade - 9.8 %, energy - 9.6 %, restaurant and hotel services – 8.5%, real estate - 6.0 %, while agriculture suffered 14.4 % reduction. Poverty went down from 54.5 % in 2003 to 39.4 % in 2005, including reduction of extreme poverty from 14 % to 7%.
Skeptics argue that much of Georgia’s recent growth is the result of a recovery from the appalling economic environment that existed prior to the Rose Revolution. They point to the one-time benefits of reducing corruption, increased private sector confidence and privatization, and argue that much of Georgia’s strong performance is due to these one-off factors rather than an especially conducive macroeconomic framework, of which property rights is one dimension. Accordingly, they believe that in the absence of more fundamental reforms, the recent strong growth cannot be maintained.
Employing workers: The new labor code eases restrictions on the duration of term contracts and overtime work.  New law give freedom of choice to be a union member or not, to negotiate over contracts individually or collectively, by whom to be represented on this negotiations. It is based on voluntary unionism, that enables individuals to chose whether to be a member or not of a union and if so which union or representative; make it illegal for labor unions and employers to enter into contracts that provide for a business to employ only union members in the jobs covered by the contract. Workers could chose to represent themselves in negotiations or disputes or have anyone to represent them (union, lawyer, friend, partner...) and abolish union monopoly on representation of employees in negotiations with employer. It enables each employee to choose either – (i) To negotiate an individual employment contract with his or her employer; or (ii) if they do value the collective bargaining services that unions perform, to join a collective employment contract to which his or her employer is a party. Law also limits strike action and promote co-operation rather than confrontation.
The new law provides for one month’s severance pay, replacing complex rules requiring varying notice periods and the involvement of labor unions and the Labor Inspectorate. Georgia also reduced the social security contributions paid on wages by businesses from 31% to 20%.  Together, these changes make Georgia the sixth easiest place to employ workers globally,  while it was 71st year ago. Difficulty of Hiring Firing Index - 0, Rigidity of Employment Index - 7, Hiring cost (% of salary) - 20, Rigidity of Hours Index - 20, Firing costs (weeks of wages) - 4.3. New law lessen unemployment and promote economic growth, productivity and income. As a result, unemployment fell by 1.7 %, but it still remains very at high level of 13.8%, including 25 % of urban unemployment.
The Georgian government adheres to a number of International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions. Georgia has signed multiple ILO agreements, including the Forced Labor Convention of 1930; the Paid Holiday Convention of 1936; the Anti-Discrimination (employment and occupation) Convention of 1951; the Human Resources Development Convention of 1975; the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention of 1949; the Equal Remuneration Convention of 1951; the Abolition of Forced Labor Convention of 1957; the Employment Policy Convention of 1964; and the Minimum Age Convention of 1973.
Registering Property In Georgia it takes 6 steps and 9 days to register property. The cost to register property there is 0.5% of overall property value. In global ranking we occupy 16th position. In Norway it takes 1 steps and 1 days to register property. The cost to register property there is 2.5% of overall property value. Even in neighboring Armenia it takes 3 steps and 4 days to register property. The cost to register property there is 0.4 % of overall property value.
'''
Enforcing contracts: Georgia established specialized commercial sections in the courts.  Also, the supreme and appellate courts can now decide which cases to review.  Previously, it dealt with every case sent by the lower courts.  In addition, Georgia has been striving to reduce corruption in the courts by increasing judges’ salaries and more aggressively investigating corruption and taking disciplinary measures against judges.
One of the indicators of reforms’ success is the increased efficiency of the judicial system in resolving commercial disputes. Georgia jumped by 24 scores and is now ranked 32nd in the world in terms of ease of enforcing contracts. Georgia is now placed ahead of such countries as Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Thailand, Romania, Greece, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Philippines, Slovakia, China, Macedonia, FYR, Chile, Kuwait, Malaysia, Slovenia, Mexico, Israel, Poland, Brazil, Italy, Egypt, and India. It takes 24 steps and 285 days to enforce contracts here, while the cost of enforcing contracts is 20.46% of debt. It is far from Denmark where to enforce contracts it takes 15 steps and 190 days and costs 6.5 %., or just 109 days New Zealand.
Before the Rose Revolution, independence of the judiciary was so weak that in almost all cases – whether criminal, administrative, or civil – the state party prevailed. With the recent changes, the imbalance has been significantly remedied to the benefit of private parties. During January-September 2006, out of 620 cassation claims on tax disputes heard by administrative chamber of Supreme Court 269 was resolved in favor of the state authorities, and 306 in favor of the private party. 8 cases were resolved through mediation. 105 cases were returned to the court of the first instance for rehearing. Among them: 30 cases were resolved in favor of administrative bodies, 85 – in favor of private parties. Georgia needs to develop a credible strategy for strengthening the judiciary with particular emphasis on civil law, e.g., commercial contract enforcement and dispute adjudication.
Starting a Business – Georgia jumped up by 23 grades and now is 36st place to start business. Entrepreneurs can expect to go through 7 steps to launch a business over 16 days on average, at a cost equal to 10.9% of gross national income (GNI) per capita. They must deposit at least 3.7% of GNI per capita in a bank to obtain a business registration number, that means reduction from 2,000 lari to 200. As a result, business registrations rose by 55 %. But this is still far from perfection - In comparison, launching a business in Canada takes juts 2 steps over 3 days on average - entrepreneurs can get incorporation via the online Electronic Filing system, at a cost equal to 0.9% of gross national income (GNI) per capita. There is no minimum deposit requirement to obtain a business registration number. 
In 2005, the business registration procedure was simplified. Paperwork and fees are reduced, and processing time shortened to about 8 – 10 days from the submission of documents. Business registration and tax registration are separate procedures handled by the same department within the Ministry of Finance. All companies are required to register with the Ministry of Finance, providing founder's and firm principals' names, dates and places of birth, occupations and places of residence; incorporation documents; area of activity; and charter capital. This information, stated on a registration card, is subject to publication. Any person may request and review business registration information. 
Dealing with licenses: Georgia eliminated 80% of licenses and permits. A June 2005 law on licenses and permits decreased the number of agencies involved in issuing licenses and permits, as well as licenses and permits from 909 to 159 and restricting licensing to only those activities that affect public health, national security and the financial sector. The law eased the application procedure, which is now based on a “one-stop shop” principle and administrative silence, and stipulates 20 or 30 days for permit and licenses issuances, respectively.
From 152 country jumped to 42 position in global ranking. It takes 137 steps and 17 days to complete the process, and costs 71.73% of income per capita. But there is still room for improvement – to comply with licensing and permit requirements for ongoing operations in Denmark it takes only 7 steps and 70 days to complete the process, and costs 67.75% of income per capita.
In June 2005, the government split the former accreditation department into two agencies—National Agency of Technical Norms of Standards and Metrology, and Accreditation Center—abolishing obligatory conformity certification. Georgia still needs to develop norms for these agencies.  Georgian State Accreditation Center is responsible for testing goods requiring a special testing procedure. The time required for testing goods subject to certification may vary depending on the type of these goods. The law no longer requires obligatory local testing of goods. The old Soviet system of product standards—numbering at least 26,000—still applies in theory. In practice, any product, which meets an acceptable American, CIS, or EU standard, should have no difficulty in the Georgian marketplace.
In the area of getting credit, Georgia also has made some legislative changes to facilitate the exchange of credit information, and a private credit bureau began to support the exchange of information among banks. Georgia also is relatively poorly ranked in closing a business (ranked at 86), suggesting a need for bankruptcy reform.  
Trade
Trading across borders, where Georgia ranks at 95, due to a relatively high cost to import and export and a large number of required procedures. Export and import regulations were liberalized, custom procedures harmonized with European Community Customs Code, number of documents needed for customs decreased, flexible custom procedures both for local business and for transit were introduced, licensing of transporters and payments at border check points abolished. New law on customs duties abolished almost 80 % of duties, sets zero rate on almost everything, except on agricultural products. 
New customs tariffs came into force starting from September 1. Liberalized customs tariffs mean lower prices for the consumers and boosting investments. Custom dues on up to 90 percent of all imported goods - including non-agricultural products and raw materials, will equal to zero, except on most agricultural products and those products which are produced locally, construction material, which will be taxed with 12 percent rate, to avoid additional competition for locally produced products. Imports are often part of the export products either as an intermediate product or as the service of machinery and capital. In a small country with a limited variety of locally produced products inexpensive imports are important to keep the price of export goods low.
Liberalization of the notary and enabling of competition transformed the Georgian notary profession into one of the least regulated in Europe. Most of the instances notarization will not be mandatory, but when it is not required by law, someone can involve a notary to strengthen a document’s validity and protect it from fraud. The main function of the reformed notary is to deter fraud. Unlike the Latin notary, the reformed notary is not responsible for the accuracy or legality of the documents he notarizes. The notary simply certifies the identity of the signers, who are responsible for the content of the document. 
While Georgia is the leading reformer several consecutive years, there are still several areas where there is considerable room for improvement, especially on protecting investors, corporate governance, obtaining licenses, access to credit information, access to affordable credit, trading across borders, and disclosure of information to investors and shareholders.
While the reduction in corruption required strengthening some institutions (e.g., police and the prosecutor), it has not yet translated into better enforcement of property rights for investors. It is generally acknowledged that Georgia’s formal legal structure and security of property rights regime - the body of law - is adequate, but the enforcing institutions are not effective and integrity of legal system and judicial independence and impartiality is questioned. 
Protecting Investors although cleaning up of public institutions from corruption was one of the reasons why Rose Revolution took place, anti-corruption effort has strong ownership and visibility, clear messages have been conveyed to the public and the international community and improvement governance systems and processes is progressing with significant momentum, private corruption remains as one of the main challenge to improve business climate and attract investment. 
Georgia's position worsened by 2 scores and now we occupy 135th position out of 175 countries, covered by World Bank in terms of strength of minority shareholder protections against misuse of corporate assets by directors for their personal gain. We get only 4-4 scores for transparency of transactions, director liability for self-dealing and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct, while New Zealand is awarded 10, 9 and 10 grades respectively. 
Corporate governance is area where Georgia has the opportunity to implement strong reforms that will attract investors. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), in its work in Georgia, has highlighted corporate governance, for the private sector, non-listed companies, and listed companies, as well as the remaining companies that stayed in the public sector, as an area where Georgia can gain a large windfall. If one is seeking to attract investors, evidence is mounting throughout the world that creating a strong, transparent, and fully enforceable corporate governance system can be a mechanism for a small open economy, like Georgia, to signal its commitment to reform.
It has to be acknowledged that few firms are currently listed on the Georgia Stock Exchange (http://www.gse.ge) and share trading is quite limited. Nevertheless, there is a substantial degree of minority shareholding in non-listed companies and a considerable amount of funds invested by foreign companies in Georgian firms. At present, the EBRD reports that the primary ways that minority shareholders gain protection is by “asking courts to appoint an independent auditor and/or calling for a general shareholders’ meeting to question company management…” – neither of which are deemed particularly effective.12 While improving the corporate governance system in emerging markets with weak rule of law is difficult, it is possible to strengthen the capital markets authorities, introduce systems of binding arbitration, require all state-owned firms to corporatize and become fully transparent, and generally strengthen the legal rights of minority shareholders.
Despite the legal underpinnings for protection of commercial activity and of property rights, in practice, inadequate protection of contracts and property rights are problems encountered by the foreign investment community in Georgia. Foreign investors' interests have sometimes been harmed by biased court proceedings, legislation and decrees that clearly favor the Georgian entity or partner involved in the enterprise. Judicial reform has been identified as a top priority for the Georgian government beginning in late 2005, but it will take some time for court and legal reforms to bear fruit.
Disputes over investors’ rights made press headlines frequently in 2004 and 2005. These cases have undermined confidence in the impartiality of the Georgian judicial system and rule of law, and by extension, Georgia’s investment climate. Disputes sometimes centered on alleged illegal or improperly handled privatization and bankruptcy proceedings, and in at least two cases, questionable procurement procedures by government entities. Other disputes involve the liability of the foreign investor for debts and taxes incurred by a Georgian enterprise before privatization or bankruptcy. Such disputes have often involved alleged manipulation of corporate legal documents to the detriment of the foreign investor.
Paying Taxes - Although tax reform in previous years has simplified taxes and decreased rates and thus pushing country from 160 up to 104 rank, still, medium size company in Georgia must make 35 payments, spend 423 hours, and pay 37.79% of gross profit in taxes, while in Ireland entrepreneurs must make juts 8 payments, spend only 76 hours, and pay 25.78% of gross profit in taxes. As a result of judicial reforms, new tendency indicates that in growing number of instances courts became effective tool to defend taxpayers rights. During January-September 2006, out of 79 cassation claims on tax disputes heard by administrative chamber of Supreme Court 31 was resolved in favor of the tax authorities, and 48 in favor of the private party. out of 20 Returned for hearing anew 9 was resolved in favor of the tax authorities and 11 in favor of the private party. 
Country needs in order to give the economy new impetus is a modern and efficient tax administration and the decriminalization of financial relations between the state and entrepreneurs. Government proposes from 2007 re-introduction of tax arbitration and unification of the tax and customs department and financial police, where the law enforcement will be the last resort and last point of relationship with business, and it will only be used in extremely rare cases. All the rest should be solved based on civil relations between the state and business.
Some Georgian observers claim that Saakashvili’s reforms demonstrate that Soviet successor states can democratize and that this example threatens regimes in Belarus and Russia that argue that such reforms are culturally inappropriate. These observers
allege that President Putin has reacted by ratcheting up economic pressure on Georgia to reduce Saakashvili’s popularity in Georgia and so encourage “regime change,” but that the wins by most National Movement candidates in recent municipal elections indicate that this tactic is not working.</div>
--Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything in this article is true. BTW, how can we expect impartiality from someone who supports independence for Abhazia and OssetiaKeverich1 (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy 

message: Although Georgia's Rose Revolution occurred only three years ago, many positive results are already visible, especially as concern foreign investment and the overall perception of the country among multinational policymaking bodies. The new government has made concrete progress towards meeting international standards not only in terms of political governance, such as in its anti-crime and -corruption drive, but in terms of economic modernization. 
Georgia’s overall economic performance in 2006 continues to be strong despite the external shock associated with Russia’s economic embargo. Economic growth has been hindered by the loss of Russian export markets, but remains robust. Preliminary indications are that real GDP growth could be about 8 percent for 2006.
Keeping a quick pace of reform has resulted in double-digit economic growth for a second year in a row, despite immense external pressure. Georgia’s macroeconomic picture is now quite favorable, characterized by good fiscal performance, a stable currency, growing consumer spending together with low levels of personal debt, robust government investment in infrastructure, and a notable increase in activity by foreign investors.  Up to 100,000 jobs have been created this year, while the number of people living below poverty line has declined by six percent.  Several key reforms implemented this year, including further reduction of institutional corruption, simplification of licensing, liberalization of the labor market, and improvement of property rights and contract enforcement have established excellent prospects for better performance during the forthcoming year.
Since 2004, the Georgian government has undertaken institutional reforms including the restructuring and downsizing of government ministries, cut red tape for businesses, overhauled the tax code and abolished most customs duties, privatization of large state-owned entities as well as forty-five percent of remaining state-owned land (fifty-five percent of agricultural land was given to the farmers for private ownership free of charge in 1992), payroll increases for public servants, anti-corruption measures, improvements in tax and fiscal administration, licensing reforms, deregulation, customs reform, and other efforts to reduce opportunities for corruption and make it easier to do business in Georgia.
Based on overall performance and the Georgian government’s strong political commitment to structural changes, Georgia received its first sovereign credit rating in late 2005 from Standard and Poors: B+ long-term, and B short-term rating. Other studies and rankings done by international organizations such as the International Financial Corporation, World Bank/EBRD, and the Heritage Foundation have noted significant improvements in democracy, governance, and the business climate.
In 2006 Gallup Corruption Index, ranking 101 countries on  perceptions of corruption in business and government, Georgia tied for thirty-first, with a score of sixty-eight. This progress has been noted by such institutions as the EBRD and the World Bank, which recently cited Georgia as having achieved the largest reduction in corruption among all transition countries from 2002 to 2005.
Georgia saw the largest reduction in corruption among all transition countries from 2002 to 2005, says a World Bank  report. "Anticorruption in Transition 3 — Who is Succeeding and Why?" is a detailed report of studies examining the patterns and trends in corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: "Among countries showing the most dramatic improvements are Georgia and the Slovak Republic, where committed leaders are implementing strong programs of economic and institutional reform and firm-level bribery has fallen substantially", the World Bank report reads. "The most striking improvements from 2002 to 2005 were in Georgia where the percentage of firms reporting that bribery of tax officials was frequent fell from 44 percent to 11 percent in these three years.”  The report says that major improvements are also observed in customs-related bribery in Georgia. The firms in the survey report less frequent bribery in the courts then three years ago in a few countries, including in Georgia, Romania and the Slovak Republic, according to the WB report. These measures have encouraged many businesses out of the shadows and into the formal economy, resulting in significant rises in government revenue and helping to reduce the budget deficit to a manageable level. 
The microeconomic picture shows slow progress. Georgia must cope with increased unemployment caused by state layoffs, deep social spending needs, and an economy made uncompetitive by years of neglect and poor policy. Physical infrastructure is badly outdated and deteriorated after more than a decade of neglect and corrupt management by the previous government. These substantial needs represent both an opportunity and an impediment to investment and growth. Although Georgia’s financial sector is growing well and is considered generally healthy, access to credit for consumers is still limited, and hampered further by weak external liquidity of the banking sector. Average lending rate in 2005 was 17.9, comparative to 4.0 in EU.
Real GDP growth in 2005 was 9.3%, up from 6.2% in 2004 and 8% in 2003. However, although nominal GDP per capita increased from USD 876.9 in 2003, but is still remains low at about 1599 USD in 2006. Inflation for 2005 was about 6%. The growth is visible in financial intermediation – 56.7 %, transport and storage – 37.7 %, construction - 25.9 %, mining - 23.9 %, manufacturing - 20.1 %, communications – 19.5 %, trade and repair services – 13.8 %, real estate, renting and business activities – 11.4 %; trade - 9.8 %, energy - 9.6 %, restaurant and hotel services – 8.5%, real estate - 6.0 %, while agriculture suffered 14.4 % reduction. Poverty went down from 54.5 % in 2003 to 39.4 % in 2005, including reduction of extreme poverty from 14 % to 7%.
Skeptics argue that much of Georgia’s recent growth is the result of a recovery from the appalling economic environment that existed prior to the Rose Revolution. They point to the one-time benefits of reducing corruption, increased private sector confidence and privatization, and argue that much of Georgia’s strong performance is due to these one-off factors rather than an especially conducive macroeconomic framework, of which property rights is one dimension. Accordingly, they believe that in the absence of more fundamental reforms, the recent strong growth cannot be maintained.
Employing workers: The new labor code eases restrictions on the duration of term contracts and overtime work.  New law give freedom of choice to be a union member or not, to negotiate over contracts individually or collectively, by whom to be represented on this negotiations. It is based on voluntary unionism, that enables individuals to chose whether to be a member or not of a union and if so which union or representative; make it illegal for labor unions and employers to enter into contracts that provide for a business to employ only union members in the jobs covered by the contract. Workers could chose to represent themselves in negotiations or disputes or have anyone to represent them (union, lawyer, friend, partner...) and abolish union monopoly on representation of employees in negotiations with employer. It enables each employee to choose either – (i) To negotiate an individual employment contract with his or her employer; or (ii) if they do value the collective bargaining services that unions perform, to join a collective employment contract to which his or her employer is a party. Law also limits strike action and promote co-operation rather than confrontation.
The new law provides for one month’s severance pay, replacing complex rules requiring varying notice periods and the involvement of labor unions and the Labor Inspectorate. Georgia also reduced the social security contributions paid on wages by businesses from 31% to 20%.  Together, these changes make Georgia the sixth easiest place to employ workers globally,  while it was 71st year ago. Difficulty of Hiring Firing Index - 0, Rigidity of Employment Index - 7, Hiring cost (% of salary) - 20, Rigidity of Hours Index - 20, Firing costs (weeks of wages) - 4.3. New law lessen unemployment and promote economic growth, productivity and income. As a result, unemployment fell by 1.7 %, but it still remains very at high level of 13.8%, including 25 % of urban unemployment.
The Georgian government adheres to a number of International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions. Georgia has signed multiple ILO agreements, including the Forced Labor Convention of 1930; the Paid Holiday Convention of 1936; the Anti-Discrimination (employment and occupation) Convention of 1951; the Human Resources Development Convention of 1975; the Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention of 1949; the Equal Remuneration Convention of 1951; the Abolition of Forced Labor Convention of 1957; the Employment Policy Convention of 1964; and the Minimum Age Convention of 1973.
Registering Property In Georgia it takes 6 steps and 9 days to register property. The cost to register property there is 0.5% of overall property value. In global ranking we occupy 16th position. In Norway it takes 1 steps and 1 days to register property. The cost to register property there is 2.5% of overall property value. Even in neighboring Armenia it takes 3 steps and 4 days to register property. The cost to register property there is 0.4 % of overall property value.
'''
Enforcing contracts: Georgia established specialized commercial sections in the courts.  Also, the supreme and appellate courts can now decide which cases to review.  Previously, it dealt with every case sent by the lower courts.  In addition, Georgia has been striving to reduce corruption in the courts by increasing judges’ salaries and more aggressively investigating corruption and taking disciplinary measures against judges.
One of the indicators of reforms’ success is the increased efficiency of the judicial system in resolving commercial disputes. Georgia jumped by 24 scores and is now ranked 32nd in the world in terms of ease of enforcing contracts. Georgia is now placed ahead of such countries as Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Thailand, Romania, Greece, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Philippines, Slovakia, China, Macedonia, FYR, Chile, Kuwait, Malaysia, Slovenia, Mexico, Israel, Poland, Brazil, Italy, Egypt, and India. It takes 24 steps and 285 days to enforce contracts here, while the cost of enforcing contracts is 20.46% of debt. It is far from Denmark where to enforce contracts it takes 15 steps and 190 days and costs 6.5 %., or just 109 days New Zealand.
Before the Rose Revolution, independence of the judiciary was so weak that in almost all cases – whether criminal, administrative, or civil – the state party prevailed. With the recent changes, the imbalance has been significantly remedied to the benefit of private parties. During January-September 2006, out of 620 cassation claims on tax disputes heard by administrative chamber of Supreme Court 269 was resolved in favor of the state authorities, and 306 in favor of the private party. 8 cases were resolved through mediation. 105 cases were returned to the court of the first instance for rehearing. Among them: 30 cases were resolved in favor of administrative bodies, 85 – in favor of private parties. Georgia needs to develop a credible strategy for strengthening the judiciary with particular emphasis on civil law, e.g., commercial contract enforcement and dispute adjudication.
Starting a Business – Georgia jumped up by 23 grades and now is 36st place to start business. Entrepreneurs can expect to go through 7 steps to launch a business over 16 days on average, at a cost equal to 10.9% of gross national income (GNI) per capita. They must deposit at least 3.7% of GNI per capita in a bank to obtain a business registration number, that means reduction from 2,000 lari to 200. As a result, business registrations rose by 55 %. But this is still far from perfection - In comparison, launching a business in Canada takes juts 2 steps over 3 days on average - entrepreneurs can get incorporation via the online Electronic Filing system, at a cost equal to 0.9% of gross national income (GNI) per capita. There is no minimum deposit requirement to obtain a business registration number. 
In 2005, the business registration procedure was simplified. Paperwork and fees are reduced, and processing time shortened to about 8 – 10 days from the submission of documents. Business registration and tax registration are separate procedures handled by the same department within the Ministry of Finance. All companies are required to register with the Ministry of Finance, providing founder's and firm principals' names, dates and places of birth, occupations and places of residence; incorporation documents; area of activity; and charter capital. This information, stated on a registration card, is subject to publication. Any person may request and review business registration information. 
Dealing with licenses: Georgia eliminated 80% of licenses and permits. A June 2005 law on licenses and permits decreased the number of agencies involved in issuing licenses and permits, as well as licenses and permits from 909 to 159 and restricting licensing to only those activities that affect public health, national security and the financial sector. The law eased the application procedure, which is now based on a “one-stop shop” principle and administrative silence, and stipulates 20 or 30 days for permit and licenses issuances, respectively.
From 152 country jumped to 42 position in global ranking. It takes 137 steps and 17 days to complete the process, and costs 71.73% of income per capita. But there is still room for improvement – to comply with licensing and permit requirements for ongoing operations in Denmark it takes only 7 steps and 70 days to complete the process, and costs 67.75% of income per capita.
In June 2005, the government split the former accreditation department into two agencies—National Agency of Technical Norms of Standards and Metrology, and Accreditation Center—abolishing obligatory conformity certification. Georgia still needs to develop norms for these agencies.  Georgian State Accreditation Center is responsible for testing goods requiring a special testing procedure. The time required for testing goods subject to certification may vary depending on the type of these goods. The law no longer requires obligatory local testing of goods. The old Soviet system of product standards—numbering at least 26,000—still applies in theory. In practice, any product, which meets an acceptable American, CIS, or EU standard, should have no difficulty in the Georgian marketplace.
In the area of getting credit, Georgia also has made some legislative changes to facilitate the exchange of credit information, and a private credit bureau began to support the exchange of information among banks. Georgia also is relatively poorly ranked in closing a business (ranked at 86), suggesting a need for bankruptcy reform.  
Trade
Trading across borders, where Georgia ranks at 95, due to a relatively high cost to import and export and a large number of required procedures. Export and import regulations were liberalized, custom procedures harmonized with European Community Customs Code, number of documents needed for customs decreased, flexible custom procedures both for local business and for transit were introduced, licensing of transporters and payments at border check points abolished. New law on customs duties abolished almost 80 % of duties, sets zero rate on almost everything, except on agricultural products. 
New customs tariffs came into force starting from September 1. Liberalized customs tariffs mean lower prices for the consumers and boosting investments. Custom dues on up to 90 percent of all imported goods - including non-agricultural products and raw materials, will equal to zero, except on most agricultural products and those products which are produced locally, construction material, which will be taxed with 12 percent rate, to avoid additional competition for locally produced products. Imports are often part of the export products either as an intermediate product or as the service of machinery and capital. In a small country with a limited variety of locally produced products inexpensive imports are important to keep the price of export goods low.
Liberalization of the notary and enabling of competition transformed the Georgian notary profession into one of the least regulated in Europe. Most of the instances notarization will not be mandatory, but when it is not required by law, someone can involve a notary to strengthen a document’s validity and protect it from fraud. The main function of the reformed notary is to deter fraud. Unlike the Latin notary, the reformed notary is not responsible for the accuracy or legality of the documents he notarizes. The notary simply certifies the identity of the signers, who are responsible for the content of the document. 
While Georgia is the leading reformer several consecutive years, there are still several areas where there is considerable room for improvement, especially on protecting investors, corporate governance, obtaining licenses, access to credit information, access to affordable credit, trading across borders, and disclosure of information to investors and shareholders.
While the reduction in corruption required strengthening some institutions (e.g., police and the prosecutor), it has not yet translated into better enforcement of property rights for investors. It is generally acknowledged that Georgia’s formal legal structure and security of property rights regime - the body of law - is adequate, but the enforcing institutions are not effective and integrity of legal system and judicial independence and impartiality is questioned. 
Protecting Investors although cleaning up of public institutions from corruption was one of the reasons why Rose Revolution took place, anti-corruption effort has strong ownership and visibility, clear messages have been conveyed to the public and the international community and improvement governance systems and processes is progressing with significant momentum, private corruption remains as one of the main challenge to improve business climate and attract investment. 
Georgia's position worsened by 2 scores and now we occupy 135th position out of 175 countries, covered by World Bank in terms of strength of minority shareholder protections against misuse of corporate assets by directors for their personal gain. We get only 4-4 scores for transparency of transactions, director liability for self-dealing and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct, while New Zealand is awarded 10, 9 and 10 grades respectively. 
Corporate governance is area where Georgia has the opportunity to implement strong reforms that will attract investors. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), in its work in Georgia, has highlighted corporate governance, for the private sector, non-listed companies, and listed companies, as well as the remaining companies that stayed in the public sector, as an area where Georgia can gain a large windfall. If one is seeking to attract investors, evidence is mounting throughout the world that creating a strong, transparent, and fully enforceable corporate governance system can be a mechanism for a small open economy, like Georgia, to signal its commitment to reform.
It has to be acknowledged that few firms are currently listed on the Georgia Stock Exchange (http://www.gse.ge) and share trading is quite limited. Nevertheless, there is a substantial degree of minority shareholding in non-listed companies and a considerable amount of funds invested by foreign companies in Georgian firms. At present, the EBRD reports that the primary ways that minority shareholders gain protection is by “asking courts to appoint an independent auditor and/or calling for a general shareholders’ meeting to question company management…” – neither of which are deemed particularly effective.12 While improving the corporate governance system in emerging markets with weak rule of law is difficult, it is possible to strengthen the capital markets authorities, introduce systems of binding arbitration, require all state-owned firms to corporatize and become fully transparent, and generally strengthen the legal rights of minority shareholders.
Despite the legal underpinnings for protection of commercial activity and of property rights, in practice, inadequate protection of contracts and property rights are problems encountered by the foreign investment community in Georgia. Foreign investors' interests have sometimes been harmed by biased court proceedings, legislation and decrees that clearly favor the Georgian entity or partner involved in the enterprise. Judicial reform has been identified as a top priority for the Georgian government beginning in late 2005, but it will take some time for court and legal reforms to bear fruit.
Disputes over investors’ rights made press headlines frequently in 2004 and 2005. These cases have undermined confidence in the impartiality of the Georgian judicial system and rule of law, and by extension, Georgia’s investment climate. Disputes sometimes centered on alleged illegal or improperly handled privatization and bankruptcy proceedings, and in at least two cases, questionable procurement procedures by government entities. Other disputes involve the liability of the foreign investor for debts and taxes incurred by a Georgian enterprise before privatization or bankruptcy. Such disputes have often involved alleged manipulation of corporate legal documents to the detriment of the foreign investor.
Paying Taxes - Although tax reform in previous years has simplified taxes and decreased rates and thus pushing country from 160 up to 104 rank, still, medium size company in Georgia must make 35 payments, spend 423 hours, and pay 37.79% of gross profit in taxes, while in Ireland entrepreneurs must make juts 8 payments, spend only 76 hours, and pay 25.78% of gross profit in taxes. As a result of judicial reforms, new tendency indicates that in growing number of instances courts became effective tool to defend taxpayers rights. During January-September 2006, out of 79 cassation claims on tax disputes heard by administrative chamber of Supreme Court 31 was resolved in favor of the tax authorities, and 48 in favor of the private party. out of 20 Returned for hearing anew 9 was resolved in favor of the tax authorities and 11 in favor of the private party. 
Country needs in order to give the economy new impetus is a modern and efficient tax administration and the decriminalization of financial relations between the state and entrepreneurs. Government proposes from 2007 re-introduction of tax arbitration and unification of the tax and customs department and financial police, where the law enforcement will be the last resort and last point of relationship with business, and it will only be used in extremely rare cases. All the rest should be solved based on civil relations between the state and business.
Some Georgian observers claim that Saakashvili’s reforms demonstrate that Soviet successor states can democratize and that this example threatens regimes in Belarus and Russia that argue that such reforms are culturally inappropriate. These observers
allege that President Putin has reacted by ratcheting up economic pressure on Georgia to reduce Saakashvili’s popularity in Georgia and so encourage “regime change,” but that the wins by most National Movement candidates in recent municipal elections indicate that this tactic is not working.</div>
--Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything in this article is true. BTW, how can we expect impartiality from someone who supports independence for Abhazia and OssetiaKeverich1 (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Economic liberalization

message: Russia's President Putin commented in a news conference (23 December 2004) during the Orange Revolution: "It’s extremely dangerous trying to resolve political problems outside the framework of the law — first the ‘Rose Revolution’, then they’ll think up of something like blue." http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/russia/article405454.ece It should be noted that in Russian the word 'blue' - 'goluboj' - also means 'gay'. 'Rose' likewise means 'lesbian'. This would therefore seem to have been an attempt at humour on Putin's part.
I like this. A very good humour. But anyway, let us remove it from the article. Tamokk 06:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Humor or not, it is part of international reaction to the event. So it should be in the article.--KoberTalk 07:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think so. It could go to the Wikiquotes. Tamokk 07:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Nope. Look at any Wikipedia article dealing with major historic events in the recent years. They all have similar sections. Also, you have removed the passage that Saakashvili was welcomed by thousands of Adjarians in the streets of Batumi, an impressive event which was broadcasted throughout the world. I think it is due to your own political agenda. I agree that the article needs some cleanup, though. --KoberTalk 07:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although Russias negative reaction could be added. Tamokk 07:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your latest edits are appreciated.--KoberTalk 07:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joke 

message: How much more common is "Революция роз" compared to "розовая революция" in Russian? The Russian interwiki uses the former and doesn't mention the latter - so if the latter is rare/r it would make Putin's choice of it for his joke even more meaningful. Thoughts? Malick78 (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: As some others have noted, the article has a somewhat pro-Saakashvili slant to it, with many unsourced and dubious statements. If there are no objections, I will clean it up in the near future. Best wishes ValenShephard 18:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias article 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Rose Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207024037/http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/5/31/164945.shtml to http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/5/31/164945.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211061157/http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0%2C2340%2Cen_21571361_36507471_37001521_1_1_1_1%2C00.html to http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0%2C2340%2Cen_21571361_36507471_37001521_1_1_1_1%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225055624/http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=74&ItemID=11311 to http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=74&ItemID=11311
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified