Talk:Jnanpith Award

message: Sould it not be Gyanpith award. please move the page.Vivek 16:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how it's pronounced but I think this is the official spelling. --Antorjal 07:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The lead sentence of the article imputes to the nation (and its people) an award that belongs to a private organization, no matter how prestigious the award might be.  Furthermore, it continues to display (as a result of edit-warring) the Indian honours and decoration template, thereby fudging the distinction between a nation's award and an award in the nation.  All the other awards mentioned in that template are official awards of the Republic of India, which the Jnanpith Award is not.  Its inclusion in that template is the equivalent of including the Booker Prize or the Whitbread Prize on the same template with the Victoria Cross.  It is grossly inaccurate.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't necessarily disagree, but my point is that some are quasi government - Sahitya, some semi government - SSB, some non government - Jnanpith. Unlike the UK, India doesn't have a rigorous honours system, so maybe a rename to central govt awards and splitting to thematic templates is the way to go. —SpacemanSpiff 07:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ''The'' highest literary award/honour?

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Akhlaq Mohammed Khan 'Shaharyar'.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Why is the state mentioned in the recipient's table? And how does it matter? This award is not given for coming from a certain state. Language of the work matters. I am removing that. If you object, speak here. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  15:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do, I removed it earlier from Bharat Ratna too as there's been significant edit wars over "born in", "resident of", "died in" etc. —SpacemanSpiff 15:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  State? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jnanpith Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160924160855/http://archives.deccanchronicle.com/130418/news-current-affairs/article/telugu-writer-ravuri-bharadwaja-honoured-jnanpith-award to http://archives.deccanchronicle.com/130418/news-current-affairs/article/telugu-writer-ravuri-bharadwaja-honoured-jnanpith-award
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jnanpith Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305010536/http://mha.nic.in/hindi/sites/upload_files/mhahindi/files/pdf/Eighth_Schedule.pdf to http://mha.nic.in/hindi/sites/upload_files/mhahindi/files/pdf/Eighth_Schedule.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: First sentence of paragraph 2 includes the words "a cash prize of ₹1 lakh (equivalent to ₹48 lakh or US$73,000" and the first sentence of paragraph 3 includes the words "the cash prize has been revised to ₹11 lakh (equivalent to ₹12 lakh or US$18,000".  How is one lakh of rupees equivalent to 48 lakh of rupees or 11 lakh of rupees equivalent to 12 lakh of rupees?  This is strictly India, so it's all Indian rupees, so what's the deal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curmudgeonly Pedant (talk • contribs) 02:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That is because rupee has depreciated compared to USD since 1965. - Vivvt (Talk) 04:08, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rupee equivalent to rupee