Talk:Too Fast for Love

message: WHAT THE HECK! Its not punk.
Well it's not glam metal either since it pre-dates it by at least two years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.8.133.180 (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Too Fast.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Too Fast.jpg

message: The album length is wrong it should be much shorter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pickledawg (talk • contribs) 04:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album length 

message: That's just an outright lie. All known Non-Elektra CDs are bootlegs, and claiming that Nikki Sixx had it pressed before they signed to Elektra would have put the pressing at either late 1981 or early 1982, when the Compact Disc format didn't see release until October 1982.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.42.212 (talk) 21:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Promo CD

message: Wouldn't this still be considered glam punk along with heavy metal? It contains a lot of elements of both Punk (Glam Punk more specificly) and Heavy Metal, in some case together and in some cases separately. The song Come on and Dance is a perfect example of the Glam Punk style, using a Basic Punk Drum Beat focused on the Snare and Hi-Hat and Punk Riffs (Guitar and Bass). There are poppy hooks and less angry (but still edgy) vocals (compared to Hardcore and other Punk Styles) which helps differentiate the style from other types of punk. And as for the Heavy Metal Side, Live Wire is a perfect example of the Heavy Metal Side of it, using complex riffs, a rhythm provided by heavy and fast bass and drums and an emotional vocalist. Too Fast for Love is the perfect blending of the two styles which eventually would evolve into Glam Metal using a Punk Drum Beat focusing on the snare and Hi-Hat again, but still using metal riffs over the rhythm, still with poppy hooks (which would be important in Glam Metal, especially in the late 80's with the Related Pop Metal Style which would center around the the hooks), with both edgy and emotional vocals. Therefore this album should also be classified as Glam Punk and Heavy Metal, the two main foundations of Glam Metal (Which in turn was the foundation for Pop-Metal).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.126.58 (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Glam Punk?