Talk:The Bickersons

message: :Image:Bicker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bicker.jpg

message: :Image:Bickersons.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bickersons.jpg

message: There are numerous issues with the NPOV and tone throughout the article. Below are some examples of sentences in the articles that do not conform to Wikipedia NPOV and tone/style guidelines as they express opinions that from he article's authors. Such opinions would need to be attributed to outside reliable sources of they are to remain:
"About the only thing that wasn't funny about the show was the couple's apparent attitude toward each other."
"The Bickersons may have seemed to have no business being married at all, but they proved the prototype for such battling comic couples as Ralph and Alice Kramden of The Honeymooners (surely, Jackie Gleason, who admired the show, owed a debt to The Bickersons as a partial model for blustery Ralph and acid Alice; writer Rapp, according to fellow comedy writer Irving Brecher, once tried unsuccessfully to sue Gleason over some of the similarities),..."
"The Kramdens, Olesons, Bundys and others who followed may have made The Bickersons seem tame."
"Jackie Gleason probably knew that Christmas exchange—drawing as did the Bickersons episod..."''
--Cab88 (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV/Tone issues 

message: This "article" is as un-encyclopedic as can be.  Someone wrote down a  bunch of random thoughts of what s/he remembered from this show.
It needs a complete overhaul or should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.23.68 (talk) 03:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  comlete rewrite needed 

message: The "Battling Bickersons", no? I know it's "Bickering Bickersons" in http://www.bearmanormedia.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=97, but that's got to be a mistake. "Bickering" is kind of pointless, as if you didn't know that the name "Bickerson" was derivative of the verb "bicker".
The movie MASH is referred to in the article. Father Mulcahy actually says "Battling Bickersons".HowardJWilk (talk) 02:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bickering Bickersons? Battling Bickersons?