lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Marxism–Leninism

message: it should follow the standard layout of articles talking about ideology. its too clunky and incoherent. 81.104.87.43 (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Broad and not especially helpful statements. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article needs a big rework 

message: There's too many issues to name and the admins won't let us change them, so I ask the admins to work with Marxists.org and redo everything from scratch. Like literally everything even remotely communist related needs to be redone and replaced. 
Wikipedia has always been reliable for me until I started studying communism, now I question what else I've learned. 
I beg of the admins to get in contact with the people at Marxists.org and allow them to help rebuild these pages in their entirety. TheUserNameOfThisUser (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Basing everything from a single source will always be a bad idea; articles are built from a wide variety of independent sources. The reliability of Marxists.org has also been questioned in the past as it's partisan; it's good for finding works to reference, but it won't always be as objective as more independently written works. — Czello (music) 09:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Admins have no more authority than any other editors, just extra tools.  It's not up to admins or anyone to contact any third party to inquire about editing any article- persons interested in the content of an article need to be here, and discuss their concerns.  Wikipedia does not claim to be a reliable source, see Wikipedia:General disclaimer- and shouldn't be used as a source, see Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  No one should trust Wikipedia blindly- they should examine the sources for themselves. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia reflects the consensus of reliable sources, with an emphasis on academic research published by recognized subject matter experts. It is not a mouthpiece for any particular organization, faction, or doctrine, or selection of source material. Marxists.org have their own website, Wikipedia is not, nor should be, a mirror. for the particular doctrines found there, or to treat it as the sole authority on who should be considered a reliable source. Between your misconceptions about where Wikipedia finds information, and who does it, you appear to have a profoundly mistaken understanding of this encyclopedia. If you wish to explain how you think any of the 250+ references and dozens of bibliographic cites to subject matter experts are mistaken, please do so. We're not going to throw them all out to reflect one website's opinions. Acroterion (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Communist material should be sourced exclusively from Marxists.org, Wikipedia has too many errors to count and needs to be rebuilt from the ground up by the admins themselves.
Talk:Silmarils

message: Why is there no mention in this article of the similarity between the Silmarils and the Sampo from the Finnish Kalevala? It is well documented that the Kalevala was a huge influence on Tolkien and much has been said of the similarities between Túrin Turambar and Kullervo, but the obvious connection between the Silmarils and Sampo isn't mentioned anywhere. – Dyolf87 (talk) 16:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  As you say, Tolkien scholars have long discussed the connections, and these are mentioned in several Middle-earth articles. I'll take a look at the scholarly literature again on this aspect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added a bit of the scholarship on the question. It actually points up what a curious symbol a Silmaril is, full of holy light yet creating an unholy mess. Interesting, thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Silmarils and the Sampo
Talk:Truth table

message: "This demonstrates the fact that p ⇒ q {\displaystyle p\Rightarrow q} p\Rightarrow q is logically equivalent to ¬ p ∨ q {\displaystyle \lnot p\lor q} {\displaystyle \lnot p\lor q}."  Then, logically, isn't one of these functions redundant and therefore completely unnecessary?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:780:3926:9526:680D:B40F:658F (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications 

message: Implies *is* associative. 𝑝→(𝑞→𝑟) should not be read as "p implies that q implies p, but "p implies q which implies r"
The reason why the brackets rule does not work is because of notational peculiarities. Associativity is not about brackets, associativity is about successive applications of an operator, which is different. And the successive applications of the implies operator yield same result independent of the order in which the operations are performed.
Read about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light%27s_associativity_test  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.26.72.172 (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implication is associative 

message: Better naming would be ‘number of truth tables’ (for given n; the size of a truth table for n bits  is 2^n)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.83.38.187 (talk) 15:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of truth table 

message: I'd like to have some text in the article about truth tables outside of classical logics. My first attempt ("they mostly can't be used there") was reverted by  with a link to Sylvan.1992 which turned out to be based on Tennant.1989, a more elaborate paper. For a second attempt, I'd suggest a text like
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Tenant gives a proof-theoretic investigation of truth tables in both classical and nonclassical logics, based on a strict "left-right reading" that does not require each formula to have a truth value in the set {T,F}. See also Three-valued logic#Logics and Four-valued logic#Logical connectives for examples of truth-tables in logics with >2 truth values. 
</BLOCKQUOTE>
However, I'm not sure I understood the papers correctly, so I'd like to have some advice from a proof theory expert. 
As an aside, Tenant explains on p.460, , while on p.462, he claims that , the disjunction truth table says ; the latter conclusion can be drawn (from an ordinary 4-row table as shown on p.463) only if the truth value of B is assumed (to be defined and) in the set {T,F}. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truth tables outside of classical logics
Talk:Mario Party 2

message: This section is really crufty, and I think it should be removed. Any objections? –The Great Llamasign here 23:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I really see no reason to object, so I guess I'll be bold and remove it now. –The Great Llamasign here 00:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini games 

message: CROSSPOST
: Please see Talk:Mario Party 8#Request for comment: Lists of mini-games. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 11:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario Party articles RFC 

message: In the article, it says (talking about Duel Minigames) "Typically, Donkey Kong uses certain cheating tactics in order to win, while Mario tends to lose."
This is either a fact which should be cited, or the guy who wrote this always plays as Mario and loses against his skilled friend who always plays as Donkey Kong.
I'll leave this up for discussion, I can't say I've ever played Mario Party 2.
:Thanks for telling us that. I've removed it. — MalcolmUse the schwartz! 23:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Un-cited moaning. 

message: :Image:Battlegames.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no [[Wikipedia:Fair use rati--99.239.211.18 (talk) 15:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Battlegames.jpg

message: I removed it because it was not important and seemed to have been written by an inexperienced and biased editor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.249.5 (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other features 

message: We should add a plot summary here; it starts with the characters arguing over who their new land should be named after and Bowser threatening to invade the land. Then after all five lands are completed, the player has to play the last land "Bowser Land" in order to defeat the big evil turtle. It has a full ending scene and everything! Anyone name one good reason why we shouldn't add a plot summary. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:2077:C477:CB7F:492D (talk) 02:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mario Party 2's story is one of the least notable things about the game. It's already described in the start of the gameplay section in just two or three sentences, which shows how insignificant it actually is. I don't see how you can write an entire section dedicated to the story that isn't what you just described without adding a ton of perfunctory fluff. ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess not. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:1570:E11F:903:D176 (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story
Talk:Stephen V of Hungary

message: Please stop reverting my edit. MLCC is not a completely reliable source, but is reliable enough when Cawley cites his sources, which he does in this case. If you think MLCC is not sufficiently reliable and don't have another source at hand, please use the appropriate tag in the template. If you have a more reliable source at hand, you're welcome to add it yourself.--Masque (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Stephen V of Hungary is a GA. If we want to preserve this status we cannot use self-published sources. Stop edit warring and read WP:3RR. Borsoka (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

text: Well, first and foremost, the link does not even lead to an ahnentafel of Stephen V. It does not include his maternal ancestry at all. Secondly, why do we need that chart anyway? No biography of Stephen includes it. No biography of Stephen mentions Manuel Laskaris or Agnes of Rochlitz. Surtsicna (talk) 16:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry
Talk:Zbigniew Brzezinski

message: On other Wikipedia editions such as in French or Russian, he is described as an American [...] of Polish origin. Which I believe is more fitting, while he was born in Poland, he studied in Canada and the US and made his career in the US, and is remembered for that. As far as I know he did not work in Poland, although I could be wrong. --Spafky (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is English Wikipedia, which should not draw conclusions from other language-Wikipedias, especially Russian under current circumstances. Bit nonsensical really. I believe that the Polish-American identity was based on citizenship rules under Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography. Personally, I find 'Polish-born' and 'Polish-American' quite synonymous so I do not mind. Merangs (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish-American vs Polish-born American 

message: I added the following to Zbigniew Brzezinski
Brzezinski stated that human rights could be used to put the Soviet Union ideologically on the defensive:
:I felt strongly that in the U.S.-Soviet competition the appeal of America as a free society could become an important asset, and I saw in human rights an opportunity to put the Soviet Union ideologically on the defensive....by actively pursuing this' commitment we could mobilize far greater global support and focus global attention on the glaring internal weaknesses of the Soviet system.Zbigniew Brzezinski.  National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter, US President (1977-1981). Power and Principle. Chapter 5.
Tulsipres (talk) 05:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OP has been blocked as a sockpuppet.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights as a weapon against the USSR - used today with Russia and China  

message: — Assignment last updated by Jgjarabek (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST-J496

message: How many languages did he speak? Hansung02 (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages
Talk:1 megametre

message: I don't think we should use "as the crow flies" on this page -- is it an expression that all speakers of English will understand? -- Tarquin
:I think it's a well-known idiom, and not just in English, though it may not be a crow in other languages (e.g. "à vol d'oiseau"). But what crow - or any other bird for that matter - flies from Dublin to San Francisco? -phma
::A better term might be the Great circle distance or route, as the shortest distance between two points over the surface of a sphere (or the earth) is the arc of the largest (greatest sized) circle drawn around the sphere that passes through both points.  The shortest distance is a line segment that passes through both points  but this passes through the earth so cannot be travelled (easily). - kiwiinapanic 10:02 Feb 18, 2003 (UTC)
::: I think that "as the crow flies" is the best term for the distance between two places. It also has the advantage of being the most used term. Great Circle is not commonly used, in fact I have not heard of it before. Goatface.
::::Why just not use the term Geodesic curve?--neolandes (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2002 topic 

message: * 1,060 km — diameter of Tethys, one of Saturn's major moons
* 1,158 km — diameter of Ariel, one of Uranus' major moons
* 1,118 km — diameter of Dione, one of Saturn's major moons
* 1,169 km — diameter of Umbriel, one of Uranus' major moons
* 1,528 km — diameter of Rhea, one of Saturn's major moons
* 1,523 km — diameter of Oberon, one of Uranus' major moons
* 3,122 km — Diameter of Europa (moon of Jupiter)
* 4,821 km — Diameter of Callisto (moon of Jupiter)
* 5,262 km — Diameter of Ganymede (moon of Jupiter)
* 5,150 km — Diameter of Titan (moon of Saturn)
**Only one moon per planet, please.
* 1,619 km — Length of land boundary between Norway and Sweden
* 3,218 km — Length of Sweden's coastline
* 1,572 km — Length of Sweden from north to south
* 1,490 km — Maximum length of main chain of islands of New Zealand
**One measurement per country.
* 1,600 km — Length of the Blue Nile
* 3,700 km — Length of the White Nile
* 6,695 km — Length of the Nile-Kagera-Ruvuvu-Ruvusu-Ruvyironza River system.
**One length per river.
* 1,320 km — Length of the Rhine
* 4,240 km — Length of the Mackenzie
* 4,410 km — Length of the Amur
* 4,260 km — Length of the Lena
* 5,570 km — Lenth of the Ob-Irtysh River system
**I don't recongize these rivers - if they are sufficiently notable, feel free to re-add them.
As always, if you really care, feel free to rev-add any ones you wish. JesseW 23:50, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rm some IMO redundant ones
Talk:Extinction

message: Extinct animals 157.50.27.170 (talk) 15:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: My 103.177.252.56 (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction 

message: Extinction is  very bad to animals because very very long. But the humans were killing more animals that is called the human extinction. You hear the dinosaurs were extended by asteroid. This is called the asteroid extinction 103.177.252.56 (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction 

message: ഹലോ ദേവ ദിസ് ഈസ് മലയാളം നമ്മളെല്ലാം മലയാള സംസാരിക്കുന്നു നമ്മളെ നാട്ടിൽ ഓരോ സ്കൂളിലും ഇംഗ്ലീഷ് പഠിപ്പിക്കും പക്ഷേ അമേരിക്ക യിൽ മലയാളം പഠിപ്പിക്ക ഇല്ല അപ്പോൾ നമ്മളുടെ ജഗതിച്ചേട്ടൻ ഇംഗ്ലീഷ് നാട്ടിൽ പോയാൽ ഇതാണ് പറയുന്നത് ശിവനെ ഇത് ഏത് ജില്ല 103.177.252.56 (talk) 14:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi devan 

message: — Assignment last updated by Warmedforbs (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Applied Plant Ecology Winter 2024
Talk:Civil Rights Act

message: My civil rights has been volunteering by Indianapolis workers comp they had been hacking into my computer and my email. They also has been hacking into my home phone I called 911. I sent a email to the FBI and they hadn't done everything about it. I don't know what to do about it. 
Gerald Mathis
KeithMathis555@gmail.com
 Mathis. Gerald (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indianapolis workers comp
Talk:GNOME

message: A new entry claims that there is a direct relationship between systemd and the XZ backdoor. 
This is not the case, as systemd is not the reason for the vulnerability, but rather distributions like Debian that configured the service in a way, that made it susceptible.  
You could just as well say, that .deb or .rpm are the reason for the vulnerability. 
It was also instrumental in getting Linux distributions to adopt systemd and thus making the entire Linux platform more susceptible to severe security vulnerabilities such as the XZ Utils backdoor.
That is simply blatant misinformation. How could this even get merged? 185.17.14.5 (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is, I've reversed the changes. QuickyWithTheWiki (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect/biased critique about systemd
Talk:Tasman Sea

message: I live in new zealand and, using my amazing powers of perception, have noticed that the beaches on the west coast are constantly rougher than those on the east. I was simply wondering: Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.254.58 (talk • contribs)  00:36, 27 December 2002 (UTC)
replies: text: Different currents causing different surfaces to be laid down? Storms more prvalent on one side or the other? Someone somewhere is bound to know... - Lee M 02:33, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier conversations

message: i tried to add the image but it didn't work UH OH! Luckily it's back to normal! I just didn't get why I was wrong-do you do something different to HTML in wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Purples the best (talk • contribs) 10:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a bit different; see Wikipedia:Images for an overview. I think there would be copyright issues surrounding the image you wanted to add. -- Avenue 11:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  opps 

message: I think that he deserves to be linked on this page. He may not have mde it but he is qutie famous for losing his life trying to cross. Therefore i have added it to the "see also" section. 77.97.170.138 (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He's only tangentially related to the actual sea. Just because he happened to disappear there, it doesn't mean that he deserves a mention in the see also section. The other items there are far more relevant. Graham87 00:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrew McAuley

message: Anyone able to add the Maori name for the Tasman Sea?  Skinsmoke (talk) 05:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Avenue (talk) 13:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maori name 

message: Based on the specific official boundary quoted in detail,    Norfolk Island does not lie within or on the boundary of the Tasman Sea.Eregli bob (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries and Norfolk Island
Talk:Jean-Paul Sartre

message: Ok so first off we need, if we are going to bring up that petition, to contextualize it both within the core of the complaint being about the unequal treatment of gay men by the law compared to straight men and also within the context of the activist milieu in which it arose. Furthrmore, we do have a whole article on that petition at French petition against age of consent laws and it cites a whole array of sources more notable for a matter of historical record than a random article in a newspaper. This isn't a current event and there's no good reason to use non-academic sources as a basis for citation here. Simonm223 (talk) 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Completely disagree. Separate issues entirely. 2001:56A:FCFE:E200:7437:80D5:5A6C:86E2 (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That petition (we all know which one) 

message: Thorstad is listed as a P.A. in his intro, why not Sartre? I’d call this a minor addition, if you will. 2001:56A:FCFE:E200:4063:3F77:64BF:36FC (talk) 10:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  P.A. Amongst other David Thorstad types. 

message: I have noticed that this article seems to be a frequent target of vandalism. I recently reverted a change (see the revision I made on 24 November 2023) which promoted the claim that Jean-Paul Sartre stated a belief in God while on his death bed, a claim that has no credible evidence. After looking through the history of this article to find the original author of said addition, I found to my amazement that the change was made all the way back in October of 2021. The fact that an unsubstantiated paragraph of text can survive two years on such a significant philosopher's Wikipedia article without seemingly anyone noticing is alarming to me.
For this reason, and because of a history of other occurrences of vandalism on this article, I would like to open a discussion for locking this page. Stephanos100 (talk) 05:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we lock this article? 

message: It's all written as if this is 100% confirmed (i.e. 'Sartre did...') when as far as I'm aware it's not entirely confirmed. Ofc I'm not defending his actions, but shouldn't it be necessary to use phrasing like 'Sartre allegedly did' rather than treating it like it's something known for definite. 2A00:23EE:2770:2CAD:D8FD:4ACD:ECD2:EE99 (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the sexual abuse section be 'alleged'
Talk:Glottal consonant

message: Perhaps an article titled "glottal consonant" could address glottal consonants, and another titled "glottal fold" could address glottal folds.  Why should an article titled simply "glottal" address glottal consonants when that appears to be a derivative, rather than primary, meaning of the word "glottal"?  -- Mike Hardy
Very hard to understand. I only understood after reading glottis twice. mysterytrey (talk) 01:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

message: How many languages oppose  and  as phonemes, and not as allophones? --JorisvS 18:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonemic {{IPA|[h]}} and {{IPA|[ɦ]}}
Talk:Predicative verb

message: "Two plus three is, basically, five."
I don't like the sentence above.  The word "basically" is useless and makes it sound as if the person who put it there is trying to impress me without having any material to impress me with.  That is why I deleted the word "basically" from this article.  I will admit that there are some occasions when "basically" is appropriate, but it is too often used in that way, and I recomment calibrating one's mental alarm bells to sound when this word is seen.  -- Mike Hardy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.84.196 (talk) 03:34, 27 December 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Index of linguistics articles

message: For those who like categories, it may be a good idea to go through all the links on this page and categorise them as :Category:Linguistics if that hasn't already happened. -- pne 13:56, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  categorise 

message: I was confused why the word "is" is a self-link, so I checked the source and saw this, but I don't understand what it's saying:
* What is a maintenance page?
* Who are the interested parties?
* How does this self-link alert the interested parties to changes?
* Why is it in the lead instead of, say, the end matter?
* Why is it required to link the word "is"?
— W.andrea (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this note in the lead mean?