lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2006 NBA Finals

message: As much as I'd like to agree with you, this really isn't the place for you to vent.  This is an encyclopedia.  If you want to chat about sports, please go to mavstalk.com or the like.--Kevin 05:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Ed, you are acting unilaterally in your interpretation of policy yet again.  There is no consensus in support of the actions you are taking. You are well aware of the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos. Johntex\talk 16:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo Removal

message: Why is there no mention of the clearly biased officiating?
:Because the officiating wasn't biased and the better team won the series. RyguyMN 05:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter about 2007. Those are two different teams, with two different seasons, which are completely different from the previous season. The "better team" in 2006 was the Miami Heat, and if the Mavericks are the "better team" in 2007, they'll go further in the playoffs, and not screw up. Tampabay721 21:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: I removed the section entilted "Roster" as there was a section "Playoff Roster" at the beginning of the article.  Seemed awfully redundant to me.  -Kevin 07:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant section

message: Welcome RFCommenters, there is a dispute on what convention should be used on this page, and eventually each and every Finals page. This one or this one? --Howard the Duck 04:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first version is uncited and border-line POV. Dlong 04:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. Ok, so I stumbled upon the article and didn't even notice people were disputing this. I read the opening and thought "Wow, is this a fan site or an encyclopedia." I'm surprised that anyone can consider the phrase "Spectacular" as NPOV and can include the additional speculative comments in the opening lead as encyclopedic. That's just terrible for an encyclopedia. Exercise better judgement, and if you're judgement is clouded, refer to Wiki's Guidelines. Zodiiak 08:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment

message: The page is missing Jason Kidd as a Hall Of Famer. 2600:4040:7A9B:D300:990E:A97A:6CD1:FC69 (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He wasn’t with the organization at the time though Eg224 (talk) 02:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page is missing Jason Kidd as a Hall Of Famer
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Joed

message: If Leroy Jenkins deserves a wiki entry, then Joe far far exceeds him.
2006.06.24 15:57
Victim: Kalila Gjlona
Alliance: Imperium Alliance
Corp: Omega Corp
Destroyed: Nidhoggur
System: 9D6O-M
Security: 0.0
Involved parties:
Name: Wuubaa
Security: -1.2
Alliance: Band of Brothers
Corp: Reikoku
Ship: Typhoon
Weapon: Berserker II
Name: Porreth
Security: -1.1
Alliance: Band of Brothers
Corp: Reikoku
Ship: Vagabond
Weapon: Vagabond
Name: Degarion Soth (laid the final blow)
Security: 0.8
Alliance: Band of Brothers
Corp: Reikoku
Ship: Pilgrim
Weapon: Valkyrie II
Name: Serpentis Chief Infantry / Serpentis Corporation
Destroyed items:
Infiltrator I (Drone Bay)
Wasp I, Qty: 3 (Drone Bay)
N-Type Kinetic Hardener I
Heavy Diminishing Power System Drain I
Invulnerability Field I
Mining Drone I, Qty: 42 (Drone Bay)
Small Tractor Beam I
Berserker I (Drone Bay)
Ogre I (Drone Bay)
Shield Boost Amplifier I
Hammerhead I (Drone Bay)
Hammerhead I (Drone Bay)
Photon Scattering Field I
Damage Control I
Large Automated I Carapace Restoration
Large 'Vehemence' I Shockwave Charge
Heavy Diminishing Power System Drain I
Ogre I (Drone Bay)
Praetor I (Drone Bay)
Mining Drone I (Drone Bay)
Mining Drone I (Drone Bay)
Mining Drone I (Drone Bay)
Mining Drone I (Drone Bay)
----------------------------------
Everyone here is saing "Joed" is not widely used or part of a narrow online world. Well here's something you may not know Eve has over 19000 players and growing daly and recived E3 Most Innovative Award from Stratics (witch can be seen atE3 2006 Awards . The use of the word has be growing but the story behind it is not known. For those who play this game it is one of the funnest moments that have happened in a very long time. If Leeroy Jenkins is worthy of a page why not this? I've seen alot on Wikipedia I have never heard of but thats why this is here isn't it? I do hope this page stays as it is the funnest thing I have heard of in the game and I would like to thank Assur for taking the time to tell it.
--Murmus 07:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Or, to put it another way, how many times has "Joed" been included in a Jeopardy! question? How many sites are selling "Joed" coffee mugs and t-shirts? No comparison. Even if every one of those 19000 EVE players is using the word, it doesn't constitute notability, or even a notable internet meme, if you can't document it spreading outside that community. Fan1967 15:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:DakshinaChitra

message: I am working on the article.  This is my first on Wikipedia if you folks think there is a larger template, I would definitely fill it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VivekVenugopalan (talk • contribs) 
* Please sign talk page comments with ~~~~. What on earth do you mena by a larger template? -- RHaworth 13:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section name sounds very much like advertising and the content doesn't add anything to the article. I deleted it and placed it here, in case anyone wants to make an argument for putting it back. Leschnei (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appreciation section 
Talk:Battle of Irish Bend

message: * Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. 
* This article would benefit from:  expansion (Aftermath) and in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: "The details lost in this less than vivid explanation there was no victor and we should rember that the confedrate forces were not offering battle only fighting a delay action." -- pulled from article text. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  editorial comments moved from the article 
Talk:Édouard Dujardin

message: Made an effort to wikify, since this article was tagged for that. Added a partial list of his works, which needs to be expanded. Hope I didn't step on anyone's toes with the editing... Akradecki 05:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unless Dujardin was the first recorded instance of a child raised by a gay couple, there is no way he could be the son of Alphonse and Théophile, these being male christian names. I suspect an error in copying, but being unable to find more about Dujardin's parents, I have simply removed the passage--Anne97432 (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion 
Talk:Siege of Tuyên Quang

message: Some of this article is in French.  KarenAnn 22:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  French needs to be translated 

message: It says 48 men were dead, I assume this means Frenchmen? --AW 07:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  48 men? 

message: A map would be nice --AW 20:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  map
Talk:Battle of Dornock

message: What is with the Scottish numbers. There is no source on it, and it seems absurd that a battle would take place between such diverce numbers. I personally have no clue what the real numbers is, but if you know, change the number.
https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=uzgjAQAAMAAJ&hl=en_AU&pg=GBS.PA414 says 260 Scots, 160 were slain while 100 taken prisoner. Numbers can vary depending on which nation's history book you're reading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.30.20 (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Figures

message: This almost entire article was a copy and paste off . I have rewrote it as best as I can. Needs citations/sources though.Acather96 (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy vios 

message: Isn't William of Lochmaben and William Douglas the same person? William Douglas is the Governor of Lochmaben and I can't find any ally of Ralph Dacre named William of Lochmaben.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.30.20 (talk) 03:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  William of Lochmaben
Talk:Battle of Boroughmuir

message: This article seems to be told like a story! Can somebody (preferably, an expert) fix this? --queso man 17:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Boroughmuir or Burghmuir or Burgh Muir? It took me ages to find this article because of the irregular spelling. Can we confirm this is the usual form? 61.68.167.135 (talk) 02:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Battle of Inverurie (1308)

message: * Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. 
* This article would benefit from:  in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]]
Talk:Eddie Money

message: I propose to add that Money played the saxophone, keyboard, and harmonica (see https://beta.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/eddie-money-singer-behind-take-me-home-tonight-and-two-tickets-to-paradise-dies-at-70/2019/09/13/3fdc6b0c-c8e5-11e9-a1fe-ca46e8d573c0_story.html). Thoughts? SunCrow (talk) 07:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that makes sense to me and seems appropriate to include on the biography of a noteworthy musician. Some of everything (talk) 22:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruments 

message: The name of the hospital that Money died in was included as an indiscriminate bit of information that has no relevance or due weight according to the topic, which is the subject's life and career. Elizium23 (talk) 00:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone's place of death seems an important location in their life (inherently where the careers become unrevivable, too). Los Angeles is a vague big place, and the precise hospital here is notable. I think a link is fine. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the reprint of a report that is the only source containing the name of the hospital, I changed my mind. It looks like the family is alleging wrongful death and medical malpractice. The hospital is relevant after all. Thanks for the suggestions. Elizium23 (talk) 03:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, thanks for that extra context. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: AThe Money Man Fan (talk) 21:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Washington Post obituary is already in the article, and it verifies saxophone, keyboards and harmonica. I added it to the infobox. We improve articles for the benefit of all readers, not as a favor to a family member. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:51, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks for this. Saw the plea at the Teahouse. Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 04:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding instruments
Talk:Sane

message: What's a "sane build environment"? I got this message while running "./configure" in order to build LAME-3.97b2 on Mac OS X 10.4.6. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 05:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitrary section 2006

message: also Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.132.252 (talk) 21:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitrary section 2009

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SANE, suggesting that it change from Peace Action#History to Sane. Editors of this page might want to participate in the redirect discussion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SANE listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nova Scotia Hospital

message: User:Iggy1963 wrote:
:I worked at the Nova Scotia Hospital for 15 years and can state emphatically that the hospital is never simply refered to as "Dartmouth". It is simply referred to as the "NS".
Among hospital staff and health care professionals, you're probably correct. The use of the term "Dartmouth" for the hospital seemed to be common among the general public in Truro, Nova Scotia, in the 1970s. TruthbringerToronto 05:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nicknames for the Nova Scotia Hospital
Talk:Economic nationalism

message: # The article does not explain how or if "economic nationalism" is different from Mercantilism.
# The article make no mention of the economic policies of Nazi Germany and fascist states of the 1920s-40s; I think the motives, goals and policies of those nations have been described by some scholars as clear examples of "economic nationalism."
# The article does not mention that Stephen K. Bannon, White House Chief Strategist to President Trump, has declared himself in a recent interview to be an "economic nationalist."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Credidimus2 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: "The article does not explain how or if "economic nationalism" is different from Mercantilism." - that's because it's not. It's just mercantilism dressed up in new clothes. This article is just original research crapola.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Closely related, but different enough for a second article. Economic nationalism is a term for something that importing countries view as an undesirable reaction to inflationary pressures in exporting countries, from when we understand "mercantilism" better and have new financial "tech" (paper money, monetary policy and central banks). The concepts overlap (tariffs, reducing imports, increasing exports, accumulating metallic currency), but it's not the same calculus without the metallic currency when we can expand the money supply without inflation. Expanding the money supply and contracting real supply was proven to be a self-defeating fallacy, from which mankind needed to be protected lest it should sicken itself, so some people started exporting gold,  against the conventional dogma. They went overboard resulting in a [great deflation. The strong implication being that economic nationalism is the risk in the paper currency age, exporting countries reduce their exports to combat inflationary pressures (not increase them as mercantilist), creating an inflation in the importing countries. Gators bayou (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Improvement
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Auckland

message: I hope you had a good time, I apologise for not making it today. Yesterday I went with a group of school (primary) kids up Mt Ruapehu, and did not feel like rushing up there today :). Thanks simon for the report. Brian | (Talk) 05:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NP you can catch the next one. I've just added a little bit for others to add more personal bits at the bottom of the report ( We do this on another wiki I frequent) and wote a quick paragraph. - SimonLyall 08:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Did anyone pick up the pen I was using at the pub? I think I just left it on the table when I left. It's an Eppendorf pen made to look a little bit like an autopipette.-gadfium 08:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost pen

message: Is another one planned? Mathmo
:No one's planning one to my knowledge, but it would seem like a good idea. If you want to organise one, the place to advertise it is at Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board. You might get reduced numbers in December because many people will already be heavily committed to other social events, and during January, since many people will be on holiday, but if you just want to meet other Wikipedians, then nominate any weekend afternoon at some reasonably central pub or cafe, preferably with convenient parking. Give a week or two notice.-gadfium 17:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: next meeting

message: js code put in to MediaWiki:Geonotice.js by gadfium for Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 5.  Archiving a copy here for future ref.

AkMeetupNotice:
 { begin: '5 May 2010 00:00 UTC',
   corners: [ [-32,166], [-48,179] ],
   text: 'You are invited to the next <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland_5">Auckland meetup</a> on 9 May 2010. Please read & watch <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_Zealand_Wikipedians%27_notice_board">New Zealand notice board</a> on NZ related issues when they crop up and participate in the discussion.'
 }

This map actually shows how it's working.  Script checked & map link provided by Pharos (talk)
Linnah (talk) 07:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geonotice js code 

message: Hi, I am on vacation in NZ in march, is any wiki meeting planned ? the list seems pretty empty. -- A1000 (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  next meeting ? 

message: Hi.  Some of the Australians are really keen to help the Kiwis establish a chapter.  We'd love to help organise a one day RecentChangesCamp in early December in Auckland, with a track to do this. As most of the people offering support are Australian, we really need help getting a venue and then help promoting it.  We've got some contacts with Wiki Educator and Creative Commons New Zealand that we can try to get involved with this.  Just need some people who might be interested in helping get the ball rolling. :)  If that's you, please get in touch with me, or drop by . --LauraHale (talk) 08:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisiting WM-NZ
Talk:Bibliography of Opus Dei

message: I'm afraid that we don't add a special main namespace page for bibliographies, so have redirected to the main article and have migrated all info except external links into the Opus Dei article. - Ta bu shi da yu 16:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now a category for this type of articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bibliographies_by_subject  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.87.190.178 (talk) 10:34, August 20, 2007 (UTC) 
A serious problem with practically all Opus Dei-related articles  It looks to me as if we have a very serious problem with all Opus Dei-related articles.   They seem to be all written almost exactly as Opus Dei would like to be seen.  Even the structure of this bibliographical article is severely biased in favour of pro-Opus Dei publications and sites.  Given the importance of the subject and the severity of some of the accusations of cultic behaviour against Opus Dei, I believe that Wikipedia has a responsibility to fix this problem as a matter of urgency. Jaimehy (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry, but no 
Talk:Computer rage

message: Possible additional link
*Classic Computer Rage example from popular meida, youtube.com video
My dad used to kick his pc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.218.101 (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Southern San Luis Valley Railroad

message: The SSLV was 1.8 miles long, dammit!  :-) (My grandfather owned it.)  I'll add to this article in the near future. -- Charlie (Colorado) 05:59, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Could somebody add a reason for cleanup to the template at the top? Thanks. Carrot official (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup template clarification
Talk:Clueless (TV series)

message: I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 16:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series 

message: The article is very poorly written, full of odd phrasing, rambling passages and a number of comments that are either opininary or lack citation. I have tagged the article as being written in a editorialistic style. (24.62.224.219 (talk) 07:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-Write

message: I think the plot section possibly needs to be rewritten or renamed as it's only facts about the movie, it doesn't actually tell you anything about the plot. goodforaweekend (talk) 01:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Rewrite

message: Howdy! I am an undergraduate student at Texas A&M University that is going to be editing this article for a technical editing course. I will be going through the sections of this article and rearranging some information to make sure all of the info fits into the most appropriate sections! I also want to change the "plot" section, as all of the information under that heading is character information or production information. I am also open to any suggestions or corrections! Thank you!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaitTip (talk • contribs) 02:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring and Improvements
Talk:Gunbarrel, Colorado

message: Gunbarrel has been defined by the United States Census Bureau as a census-designated place (CDP) within Boulder County, Colorado.  The CDP is entirely outside the city limits of Boulder, since everything within the Boulder city limits is categorized by the Census Bureau as the city of Boulder, not the CDP of Gunbarrel.
The word Gunbarrel is also used loosely by Boulder County residents to refer to a larger neighborhood which includes the CDP, an adjacent part of northeastern Boulder, and some additional territory in unincorporated Boulder County.  
Customarily, the Wikipedia article on Gunbarrel should refer strictly to the CDP, not the larger neighborhood which also includes part of Boulder.  The city of Boulder has its own Wikipedia article, as does Boulder County.
However, in its current condition this article is about both the CDP and the larger neighborhood.  This approach is improper and confusing. 
I will be modifying the Gunbarrel article shortly, making it refer to the CDP and not any part of the city of Boulder.  If someone wants to start writing articles on Boulder neighborhoods, the portion of "Gunbarrel" which is inside city limits might be one such article. Paul (talk) 08:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loose Terminology 

message: After opportunity for discussion, I reverted edits by Paul. This is based on an examination of content in other CDP pages and the guidelines on the Wikipedia Census-designated place primary page. Numerous other CDP pages contain information about the communities which they encompass. In particular I point to the Bostonia, California article. Gunbarrel is a special case, where the CDP, the unincorporated community, and the incorporated Boulder neighborhood are all of the same name, and all either geographically coincident or immediately proximate to one another. Separation into different articles hinders the mission of Wikipedia by creating artificial distinctions between and ignoring the complex intergovernmental relationships between what exists within the CDP and and incorporated portions. These reasons are elucidated further in the post above. I am going to work further to integrate statistics on the Boulder neighborhood and the unincorporated areas which are part of the CDP.  Ucbuffalo81 (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bostonia is a poor example, as it is drastically against the standard format for a CDP article.  Regardless of broad and unclear ideas of community boundaries, there are clear and distinct boundaries for CDPs, and as such we need to keep this separate.  If this were in the city, it wouldn't be a CDP.  Nyttend (talk) 16:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of 07-31-2008