lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Karnataka/Collaboration

message: All WikiProject Karnataka members,<BR>
Since there are several contributors now, who are in majority contributing individually on different articles and areas of interest, I thought it is time for joining hands together for collaborations. We can set goals of achieving featured status, for the selected article in this collaboration, and will need to work on that.
Here is the process I thought, that I wanted to put across you all.
* Any of the project member can propose any of the Karnataka related article for the collaboration.
* Based on the consensus, the article shall be selected for the collaboration. We should strictly need to have rotational basis, if we are about to have multiple collaborations on similar articles. Like if we have one article on History then next one can be Geography and then Culture and then a sports personality and so on.
* A preliminary table of contents is developed with various section names.
* Develop section by section, referring from various sources.
* Avail the required images (preferably free images, that can be put on main page)
* Create necessary templates/infoboxes
* Have multiple rounds of copy-edits (covering various aspects such as NPOVifying, grammar, etc) from external members.
* Subject it to peer review
* Incorporate all the valid review comments from peer review.
* List the article as FAC and handle that by responding to different comments/objections.
Any suggestions/thoughts/improvements are welcome. - KNM  Talk 07:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

message: List your proposal in the top of this list.
* Kannada literature
**Strong Support - This article should cover the various epoch in the development of Kannada literary styles, landmark literary writings.Dineshkannambadi 20:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ** Support per Amarrg. Would be a perfect start for Karnataka Wikiproject Collaboration. - KNM  Talk 16:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: ** Support per Amarrg - Of all the ones listed here, this one is probably closest to a peer review and/or FA.  I feel we should get this out of the way before we deal with other articles.  Sarvagnya 20:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: ** Support per Amarrg. Would be a perfect start for Karnataka Wikiproject Collaboration. - KNM  Talk 16:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Next Collaboration Proposals

message: 1) Desi Literature
2) pure kannada meters
3) Pure kannada tales and folklore
4) Suufi Literature
5) Vachana Sahitya
6) Daasa Sahitya
If you get any information on these please post them  in ddiscussion page of kannada literature.
Nrupatunga 08:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help required in improving articles on kannada literature
Talk:Orconectes

message: All the blue links in the table to the species just redirect right back to the page. This is pointless. I noticed that the stubs were all converted to redirects at some point. I see the usefulness, but I don't see the usefulness of having blue links link right back. They need to all be red. As Wikipedia progresses, individual articles can be written for each one. Having redirects makes this  difficult. Readers likely end up in circles.Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 23:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Mostly fixed now. Only two remain which I have requested speedy deletion of 86.17.100.205 (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: This article needs to be reviewed due to the 2017 reallocation of most species to Faxonius
Has now been completed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.100.205 (talk) 14:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faxonius
Talk:Robbery Under Arms

message: I was working on this in a sandbox when the stub went up so I have added my work and the article structure in accordance with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/ArticleTemplate.  I have blended the information from the stub with my work as best as possible, moving it into the appropriate sections.  I have removed some empty template sections which will need to be filled and added back in.  These are:
Section 2: Plot Summary - a more extended plot outline (with spoiler warning).
Section 4: Major Themes - thematic description (with end spoiler notice).
Section 8: Award & Nominations - not sure is this is applicable, but just in case.
I have also deleted the Trivia section but I don't think the article requires one.  Have fun.  xx baby_ifritah 11:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion & Missing Sections 

message: I'm a newbie, so you'll see that some of the references are repeated in the list.  I haven't figured out how to reference the same page in two different parts of the article yet.  My personal preference for references in a bibliography and a separate reference/notes section but the article is not at that stage yet.  Apologies, and thanks to whoever fixes this first. xx baby_ifritah 14:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The redirect Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Scolopendra

message: The taxon authors have been copied from one of those unreliable sources who put every author in parentheses. Each and every one needs fact-checking, ideally against the original description. Taxon authors should be moved to species pages as soon as they are available, to prevent duplicate lists that may get vandalized. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed section

message: Doesn't the "scolo" part of the name come from "scolex," which is Greek for worm?  At the very least, Wiktionary says that the whole word is from Greek, not Greek and Italian (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CF%83%CE%BA%CE%BF%CE%BB%CF%8C%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%BD%CE%B4%CF%81%CE%B1#Ancient_Greek)
99.110.101.3 (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Hunters Association

message: Shouldn't Tochino, Vinoruto, Tsezugera etc. also be listed here? Maybe even Shalnark ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.212.224.208 (talk • contribs).
: Definitely. Well, since Shalnark is described in detail elsewhere, he should be only linked here, but you are right, this page is meant to collect all professional Hunters' names. Feel free to edit and add! —Ru.spider 10:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header 

message: Is the "Created By" section of the hunters' template really necessary?--200.145.157.31 17:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: If he is a Tranformation type, how can he control so many dolls from far away so easily?  Shouldn't Manipulation be his weakest point since it's the farthest from Transformation on the Hexagon?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.163.11.22 (talk) 16:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morau 

message: Where are the Nen types for the characters coming from? E.g, Netero and Knuckle, etc. Is someone just putting in Specialization for every character that hasn't confirmed 100% what their type is?
Also, would it be in bad form to remove all the bot warnings about fair use in this discussion page? 
-Zyrxil (talk) 18:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the first page of chapter 212, Killua specifically states him to be a Manipulator. The cage and Shoot's hands haven't been conjured in the slightest. Unless you can cite this information from an official source, we can't add it in. -Mr. Toto (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nen Types
Talk:List of members of the Westminster Assembly

message: Great work so far! This article may be lacking a few things, at first glance:
There ought to be a comparison with the list that Alexander Mitchell has.
Some of the members go by multiple names.
Who did the superadded theologians sit in place of? (see mitchell).
Also Reid's work on the Biographies of some of the Divines ought to be referenced. He also gives a Bibliography of each man he covers.
If you would like to talk further,
216.136.67.228 08:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Great work

message: I was not able to find Christopher Love in this list.  Should he be added?  His wikipedia article mentions that he was a member. Wam067 (talk) 01:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christopher Love 

message: Alright, I initially based this page on the Hetherington book and the Westminster Assembly Project webpage (both of which are linked on the main page).  There were some discrepancies between these two sources.
Then, I realized that the new Oxford Dictionary of National Biography had a list of the Divines, so I copied that (which added a lot, actually), and tried to incorporate the information from the other two lists.  But there definitely were contradictions and inconsistencies, which I tried to resolve, but some of which probably are wrong right now.  
I would appreciate it if anyone more knowledgeable than myself could figure out how to reconcile these three sources.
Adam_sk (talk) 07:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The original document at  might be a help, though of course as a check. There are two ways to discuss the point: within the article on one of the members of the Assembly, where the sources can be compared for that particular person, or in this article. I prefer doing it per member in the article on that person, where that is possible. It seems logical that if the article on a person includes (as it will in some cases) the information that they never attended the Assembly, it should also include information about doubts whether they were elected. The alternative (and I suppose the most notable names have mostly been added by now) is to annotated this list with footnotes in the cases where there is no article and may not be for that person. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Response:  Errrr, maybe

message: Inconsistency of dates of the article Samuel Ward (scholar) and what is here. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems that article was wrong, though. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Samuel Ward

message: I've added a note on Theodore Bathurst, who is a bit complicated in terms of variant names, and of marginal notability anyway. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bathurst

message: Further notes on clear identifications with the Venn database of Cambridge graduates. One stranger is John Gippes (), who needs looking into. But seems too young ... Charles Matthews (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Neve Tzedek

message: According to Hebrew Wikipedia, the founders of the association which founded Neve Tzedek were brothers Elazar and Shimon Rokach, both Ashkenazi Jews (though of the old Yishuv), and its secretary was Feivel Kahanov, also Ashkenazi.
--89.139.200.111 (talk) 23:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded by Mizrahi Jews?
Talk:Wheel of Mainz

message: Take a look at English plural.  A quick google search reveals that "<number> spoked wheel" is rarely used, but "<number> spoke wheel" is common. Vegasprof 08:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One-legged man, three-headed dog, acute-angled triangle, etc but four-door car, five-shelf bookcase, hundred-page book. I have to say six-spoke wheel sounds very unnatural to me. In any case when there are two admissible spellings, Wikipedia policy is that as long as there are no glaring inconsistencies it doesn't matter. Xanthoxyl 14:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "six spoke wheel" 

message: I plan to replace some remaining German text by English. Vegasprof 08:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Thank you. This is an excellent page with lots of illustrations of heraldry. I like it! 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of Heraldic examples
Talk:Tiwi Islands Region

message: Hi,
I would just like to let you know that I have just added a table of statistics to this page using data from the 2016 Census. Thanks. 2001:8004:4430:D507:F092:ED29:5C6F:DC4E (talk) 05:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - there's usually no need to add a note on the talk page as page-watchers get notified of changes. I have done a quick copyedit, and shuffled the tables to the end of the article, where they usually belong. Also, each table should ideally get a specific web page citation. It's possible that I clobbered one of your changes, as I kept getting edit conflicts, sorry. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Census table
Talk:Amedi

message: pls write :  amedia a city of iraqi kurdistan!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.224.187.129 (talk) 17:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  amediya in iraqi kurdistan pls edit page! 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :ʿAmadiyya. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 14#ʿAmadiyya until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  DMacks (talk) 00:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ʿAmadiyya" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Dear Editors, the map in the info box has “Show map of Iraqi Kurdistan”, according to whom or what is this map?.--Abu aamir (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited map 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 February 2022 

message: @Kinui think it’s important to highlight, that Amedi is very wet in Iraqi standards. דולב חולב (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very wet in Iraqi standards
Talk:Kifri

message: Kifri is not a part of Sulaymaniyah governorate, and it's not officaly a part of Iraqi Kurdistan. Beshogur (talk) 17:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It is officially incorporated, but disputed by the Iraqi federal government. See The map of estimated population of Sulaimany governorate in districts level -2015, Kurdistan Region Statistics Office. Rob984 (talk) 08:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kifri is not a part of Sulaymaniyah governorate, and it's not officaly a part of Iraqi Kurdistan.
Talk:Rabia, Iraq

message: http://news.yahoo.com/iraq-shuts-border-post-syrian-rebels-seize-frontier-132241975.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.91.179.12 (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  should be added?  

message: The telegraph reported on fighting at Rabia between jihadists and Kurdish Peshmerga not YPG, check the source. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/11137455/Isil-jihadists-driven-out-of-Rabia-after-two-day-siege.html --BaranKurd (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peshmerga not YPG
Talk:Ranya

message: What on earth does the following mean?:
*The role of the people of this city is clear concerning the revolutionary movement of Kurdish people from the war against the British Empire invasion during Şêx Mehmud's government, Eylûl revolution, new revolution and amongst them the famous uprising in 1991 which broke out in this city on the 5th of march 1991. Consequently it acquired the name of 'the gate of uprising'.
Could anyone translate it into English? Skinsmoke (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muddled
Talk:Rawandiz

message: Sorry for seeing this talk page late, but I disagree with the proposed name Rowanduz in the previous section which is merely based on an incorrect transliteration. The Kurdish Latin transliteration is Rrewandiz (from ڕەواندز, I just fixed it in the article yesterday), and Rawandiz in English is a correct, simple, and recognizable approximation of it. Rowanduz on the other hand is not a recognizable name even if it is found in a small number of existing reliable sources (because it seems different from the real name). The article already uses Rawandiz anyway, and only lists Rowanduz as an alternative name in the lede and infobox. So it is fine. Cheers. Khestwol (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recognizable and correct name: Rawandiz 

message: Please discuss your changes here instead of edit-warring against several editors. Thanks.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 13:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mittanians and Hurrians relation to Kurds 

message: Semsuri, may be you don't like it, but Iraqi Kurdistan is PART of Iraq, de facto and de jure. So, removing Iraq and putting Iraqi Kurdistan is misleading and wrong. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You could have simply added which country this autonomous region was located in, but you didn't. You chose to remove the Kurdish flag instead. --Semsûrî (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iraqi Kurdistan is PART of Iraq 

message: I verified the quote. However, it would better to cite more than one source for Assyrians participating in this massacre. (t · c) buidhe 04:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veracity of quote
Talk:Sinjar

message: In the intro to the article the population is listed as 88,023 in 2013. In the data listed on the right side the population for 2013 is listed as 450,000. This is far more than a minor difference in sources, which is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.137.245.208 (talk) 21:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: What happened between the 8th Century and 2007 in Sinjar? Does the town have no history in more than a millenium? --176.239.67.71 (talk) 07:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Please stop with adding this. What should others think if we add Turkmeneli as country by Talafar, Tuz Khurmatu, etc.? The region is still part of Iraq, however KRG annexed it year ago. When it comes officialy a part of KRG, we can add Kurdistan as the country/region. Beshogur (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ezidkhan 

message: i haven't checked this article in a while but i see it's still being manipulated by the same account (RicoAlv, Rico Alvarez, various IPs) who keeps skewing articles with a pro-yazidi/anti-muslim slant. i've re-added a sourced reference to yazidi reprisal killings he scrubbed some time ago. if anyone has a sensible objection to this i'm all ears. Nucas (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: {{re|Nucas]] The relevant SPI is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wagemut/Archive. Doug Weller talk 14:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Messed up the ping.  Doug Weller talk 14:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  religious pov 

message: There’s no such thing as “Ezidiki”!!!! Stop making up stuff!!! 212.237.123.57 (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Semsûrî (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delusionalism 

message: >On 14 August 2010, a series of truck bombings by al-Qaeda in Iraq in the towns of Qahtaniya and al-Jazira, both in the Sinjar District, killed 326 Yazidis and injured 530 more.
This is wrong, both Qahtaniya and Al Jazira Complex are in Baaj District. I am not able to update with the correct information.
212.237.121.251 (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Information
Talk:Anthology (Steve Miller Band album)

message: Why should I care what Stephen Thomas Erlewine thinks? 2600:8804:138D:5A00:D4F1:E7E8:FC0B:B4D9 (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics
Talk:Antichrist (Akercocke album)

message: This album leaked on the 27th April, though I don't know what Wikipedias policy is on mentioning leaks (do we wait for a while or until the album's released or what?).
The track times listed might not be accurate, as they are taken from the leaked tracks which were ripped from an online flash player, some tracks have quite long gaps at the end for example which might not be the case on the CD.  Perhaps these should wait until the CD comes out?86.144.56.33 13:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaked/Track Times 
Talk:Pin risk

message: I think this article would beneit from a clearer distinction between:
* The phenomenon that stock prices sometimes get pinned to strikes shortly before option expirations, presumably due to option hedging activity
* The fact that exercise may be notified after the cash market is closed, causing difficulties for option writers if the stock price is near to the strike 
EdwardLockhart 09:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I think the tendency to move towards strike levels isn't necessarily a separate idea, but rather an effect of the actions of long gamma hedgers. By all means please add what you think would be helpful. Ronnotel 13:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clearer distinction
Talk:Beneath the Shadows

message: Just a track listing? Really? Hardly encyclopedic. --99.140.182.23 (talk) 19:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just applied a major rewrite; The article is now significantly more substantial. --IllaZilla (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  not encyc
Talk:Genius of Modern Music, Vols. One & Two

message: First of all, there have been several Monk albums called "Genius of Modern Music, Vol. 1."  There is an earlier CD with an entirely different lineup of songs.  There is also a CD called "Complete Genius of Modern Music" which collects all of volumes 1 & 2 of the earlier CDs.  Though the current CD seems to use artwork from an old LP, the track selections do not remotely match up.  So calling it an "expansion" or "reissue" seems like a misnomer.
Secondly, it is unlikely that the original volume 1 was released in 1947, as LPs did not appear until 1948.  Is it possible that the original was a 1950's compilation of these early tracks?
Sojambi Pinola (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing and Misleading 
Talk:The Greatest Story Ever Told (David Banner album)

message: First off I would like to apologize for cut and pasting this article to it's new title. I was unaware of what harm it does to the article until I was informed two days ago. This article is completely reliable as far as sources, therefore I don't believe it should be deleted but obviously fixed, thanks. --Ayoleftyz 01:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion + cut & paste
Talk:Silk + Steel

message: Hi,
just wanting to know if I can add the genre "glam metal" to this album? Stated as such at the following reference.
"Giuffria launch their second (and last) album, Silk and Steel, featuring one of the most hair metal–bound titles and cover arts of all time"
Source: 
Page 106. Popoff, Martin. 2014. The Big Book of Hair Metal. Voyageur Press.
Thanks!! AgentKozak (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the genre "glam metal" to this album
Talk:The Saints Are Coming: The Best of The Skids

message: Hello. If the band's name is "Skids" this article should be moved to The Saints Are Coming: The Best of the Skids. --Horcrux92 (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Ha Ling Peak

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 05:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment