lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rocklin High School

message: Are all high school articles this full of little pissing matches? AniRaptor2001 (talk) 20:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Stop putting shit under achievements that aren't achievements.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.105.0.61 (talk) 02:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Achievements

message: This is written like an advertisement. Can we discuss some less blatantly promotional wording? 108.94.48.140 (talk) 19:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puffery and neutrality 

message: The school stated in an assembly that there were 2,228 students enrolled, with 570 freshman enrolled. I don't know anything else but those two numbers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vibrioidxire (talk • contribs) 23:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019-2020 Enrollment
Talk:Rocky Creek Bridge (California)

message: How high is this bridge? Please mention the source of the height value!--79.218.109.234 (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: Both of the two references for this article are for the bridge named Rocky creek bridge in Oregon, not for the subject of this article, which is the Rocky Creek bridge in California. В²C ☎ 07:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References are for the wrong bridge!
Talk:Rodeo Beach

message: The URL for ref. 4 doesn't work (now); apparently this one reaches the place that that one did:  http://www.sfei.org/sites/default/files/RodeoLagoonHEFinalReport116_0.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.171.31 (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

message: There are separate articles for Rodeo Beach (created 2006, with a small amount of content), and Rodeo Cove (created 2007, with almost no content). Although these features aren't identical, they're inextricable, and one page to cover both seems to make sense. I don't see any other instances in this region of two separate articles covering a bay and its beach. The Rodeo Beach article has more detail, and appears to be a more commonly used name, so I suggest retaining that and making Rodeo Cove into a redirect. A separate section for Rodeo Cove on the beach article could usefully cover marine features. There may be some need to change the West Marin geographic navigation template as well. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds very reasonable to me. —Stepheng3 (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Yes -- John of Reading (talk) 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal merge from[[Rodeo Cove]]
Talk:Don Valentine

message: Why is this article written verbatim from websites?  Without citations it hinges on plagiarism... Stevenmitchell (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Written Verbatim from Websites 

message: I deleted the false statement that Richard W Muchmore was a co-founder of Sequoia Capital, this can not be referenced any where. Richard W. Muchmore was a founder of Raychem Corp http://www.almanacnews.com/morgue/2002/2002_04_24.obit24.html Jperfettini (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  False statement deleted 
Talk:Rohnert Park, California

message: Does anyone have info on Rancho Cotate? Thanks,  Ronbo76 17:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some good info in the Cotati, California article.  Stepheng3 (talk) 20:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rancho Cotate info 

message: Many city articles have a “Transportatoin” section.  Does Rohnert Park have light rail, commuter rail, or high-speed rail?
96.255.148.189 (talk) 13:19, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It has none of those. Anastrophe (talk) 15:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transit? 

message: I live near Rohnert Park and while this case is important it doesn't warrant a massive paragraph about it. I was nice enough to make a whole ARTICLE for Rohnert Park Department of Public Safety and add it there. There is no need for such a large mention on a page about the city. There are many police incidents, even shootings, that do not have any mention on the page of the city where it occurred. Police brutality and misconduct happens EVERYDAY. There is no mention of the Shooting of Eric Courtney Harris on the Tulsa article, or Shooting of Douglas Zerby on the Long Beach, California page, let alone such a big one. Not to mention these were DEATHS. There was also a teen named Jeremiah Chass shot dead by police in Sebastopol (near Rohnert Park) which had quite a bit of media attention, but there is absolutely no mention of it on the Sebastopol page.
The case really isn't that notable, and probably will be forgotten. I'd rather focus on the more serious incidents of police misconduct that need to take up so much space on a location article. Cyanidethistles (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTABILITY for sure. Anastrophe (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please stop putting that massive police incident story
Talk:List of people from Edinburgh

message: This article should probably be move from "List of famous Edinburgh people" to "List of famous Midlothian people" or "List of famous Midlothians" as Midlothian is the proper term for someone from Edinburgh.
:Eh, no. I live in Edinburgh and Midlothian is not the proper term for someone from there. This article is an offshoot from the Edinburgh city article. Of couse nowadays Midlothian is a Scottish council area, and if you wanted to start a list of famous people from Penicuik or Bilston or somewhere like that in a List of famous Midlothian people, then there is nothing stopping you. Globaltraveller 12:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel obliged remind you that "We don't accept Trust me I'm a doctor here" and that everything we do here must be verified. Having got that out of the way, allow me to contradict myself and assure that people from Edinburgh are never referred to as "Midlothians" and this article has a perfectly reasonable title. It does however need verified, something I will now try to remedy. -- IslaySolomon | talk
Total nonsense. The title of the article speaks for itself, it is a list of famous people from Edinburgh. It doesn't enter into what the citizenry of Edinburgh are called, just that they have some kind of connection with the city. Ergo, it does not stray into the bounds of verified, unless there is some discrepancy with the content of the article, rather than the name of the article, which clearly strays nowhere near the minefield of what you might term a citizen of Edinburgh. Globaltraveller 23:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The problem with this list is that it seems to mix people who were born in Edinburgh with who merely reside there.
Author Ian Rankin lives there but actually comes from Fife.  Equally, J K Rowling comes from Gloucestershire.
Maybe I'm being picky but there is a difference.
::Birth, upbringing, death or a long period of residence are required for inclusion in lists such as this, unless the list states otherwise. The people of Edinburgh have forgiven Rankin for coming from Fife. It was tough, but they managed it. Bmcln1 (talk) 08:55, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  From?
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco

message: While I agree that Archbishop Montgomery should be mentioned on this page, he was not an Auxiliary Bishop and thus should not be on that list (at least without clarification). He was actually the Coadjutor Archbishop. He never succeeded to become Archbishop because he died before Archbishop Riordan.--Dcheney (talk) 02:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have adjusted the section. Elizium23 (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archbishop Montgomery 

message: It seems odd to have auxiliary and coadjutor bishops listed under a section titled Ordinaries, since by definition, auxiliary and coadjutor bishops are NOT ordinaries!--Dcheney (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordinaries Section 

message: I have put that section back in.  I used the catholic-hierarchy site for this information.  For each diocese, it lists affiliated bishops, and it includes some who were not bishop of the diocese OR coadjutor OR auxiliary; it includes a bishop who served any part of his priesthood in that diocese, even if it was not as a bishop.  OK??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for "Other priests of this diocese who became bishops" 

message: At first glance, the use of the Profit/Loss indicators suggests things that just aren't true. In particular, the Loss marker before 24.5% strongly suggests that the Catholic population is down by 24.5% - which is not true - it is more like 6%.--Dcheney (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Profit/Loss for Population
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento

message: Someone should fill this in...
Template:Infobox Roman Catholic diocese
:There you go. Gentgeen 02:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: Consideration should be given to developing an article for the first Bishop Patrick Manogue. I would be willing to help with its development. Morenooso (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: An Comstock Magazine article that speaks about the renovation of the Cathedral has several paragraphs about Patrick Manogue that could be used to develop his article. The URL is *Holy High Point. --Morenooso (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop Manogue article 

message: I believe the map showing the territory of this diocese is more appropriate than just its cathedral which has its own article. If no objects, I will reverse the image in three days.--Morenooso (talk) 18:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article picture 

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of San Bernardino

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :St. Rose of Lima Parish in Chula Vista and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 15#St. Rose of Lima Parish in Chula Vista until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "St. Rose of Lima Parish in Chula Vista" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Santa Rosa in California

message: Ursuline HS ceased to operate in June 2011, girls came into Cardinal Newman next door and made it a coed school. gr  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.210.184.88 (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Romualdo Pacheco

message: ....before you continue to your revert campaign, as yourself a couple questions. 1) what is the purpose of the nav/suc boxes in the first place? 2) why would one have two imposing structures in the article that have the exact same function? 3) how many articles actually 'have' both that just haven't been cleaned up?  once these questions are answered, a simple application of WP:SENSE is in order. --emerson7 | Talk 16:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're referring to the succession boxes vs. the list boxes as the "imposing structures", the succession boxes give a nice concise summarized timeline of someone's political career - including years and chronology - that list boxes don't.  List boxes just give a laundry list of surnames which is typically useless to me.  When I'm looking at an individual's article, I want to see the people and years related to that individual, not a list of every person that has ever held the same offices.  Why do I need to see "Reagan" and "Brown" in an article about a 19th century Hispanic-Californian governor when there is almost no relationship?  I am using WP:SENSE but come to a different conclusion.  Your assertion that the succession boxes are "deprecated" and that other articles just need to be "cleaned up" hints that there was a consensus reached somewhere that agrees with you but that has not been shown to me.  (And yes, I have asked). WRK (talk) 16:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  succession box is deprecated and redundant.
Talk:The Railway Children (band)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/railway-children-mn0000864289/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Caoimhin (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Please do not undo my changes. The name Caoimhin is the original Irish version of the name Kevin - I should know, it is my name and I am Irish, if you do not believe me, then do a google search on the name. It may well also be something out of "Dungeons and Dragons" I do not know - but I do not like people undoing constructive changes.
:Don't take it personally, but your change wasn't constructive. As I noted, your addition is better served on Wiktionary. Also, if you want to be taken more seriously by your fellow Wikipedians, I'd highly recommend registering and signing your posts on the talk pages. To give you a chance to expand the article, I'm moving the current article to Caoimhin (Dungeons & Dragons). Good luck.--Robbstrd 21:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kevin

message: Caoimhin (pronounced "koo-ev-inn," - It's more like kwee-veen, or sometimes kwee-ih-veen. It's my name too ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.120.161.6 (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Roscoe G. Dickinson

message: Roscoe G. Dickinson has Rocabonela as (1386-1459), but Niccolò Leoniceno has Pelope as (1386-1459). I suspect one is wrong.Chmrjg (talk) 01:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelope 

message: the following is just... odd.  Not to mention almost entirely unsourced.
Scientific ancestry
See also Chemistry genealogy
*Sigismondo Polcastro (c. 1379–1473)
*Pietro Roccabonella (c. 1427–1491)
*Nicolo da Lonigo (1428–1524) (MD 1453, Padua)
*Antonio Musa Brassavola (1500–1555) (MD 1520, Ferrara)
*Gabriele Falloppio (1523–1562) (MD 1548, Ferrara)
*Girolamo Fabrici (1533–1619) (MD 1559, Padua)
*Adriaan van den Spiegel (1578–1625) (MD 1603, Padua)
*Werner Rolfinck (1599–1673) (MD 1625, Padua)
*August Heinrich Fasch (1639–1690) (MD 1665, Jena)Entry in Zedlers Lexicon Faschius, Augustinus Henricus
*Friedrich Hoffmann (1660–1742) (MD 1681, Jena)
*Johann Gottlob Krüger (1715–1759) (MD 1742, Halle)Heß, Wilhelm, „Krüger, Johann Gottlob“, in: Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie 17 (1883), S. 231 [Onlinefassung]
*Ernst Anton Nicolai (1722–1802) (MD 1745, Halle)Zimmermann, Susanne, „Nicolai, Ernst Anton“, in: Neue Deutsche Biographie 19 (1998), S. 200 f. [Onlinefassung]
*Ernst Gottfried Baldinger (1738–1804) (MD 1760, Jena)
*Johann Christian Wiegleb (1732–1800) (Apothecary 1765, Langensalza)
*Johann Friedrich August Gottling (1753–1809) (Apothecary 1775, Langensalza)
*Karl Friedrich Wilhelm Gottlob Kastner (1783–1857) (PhD 1805, Jena)
*Baron Justus von Liebig (1803–1873) (PhD 1822, Erlangen)
*Carl Schmidt (1822–1894) (PhD 1844, Giessen)
*Friedrich Wilhelm Ostwald (1855–1932) (PhD 1878, Dorpat)
*Arthur Amos Noyes (1866–1936) (PhD 1890, Leipzig)
*Roscoe Gilkey Dickinson (1894–1945) (PhD 1920, Caltech)
*Linus Carl Pauling (1901–1994) (PhD 1925, Caltech)
-- Jytdog (talk) 15:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  almost entirely unsourced
Talk:Rose and Alex Pilibos Armenian School

message: I have new information about the school that would help this Wikipedia page be more accurate and help people who are looking into enrolling their children at this school. DropkickKindergarten2 (talk) 06:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 06:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2020
Talk:Rose Hills Memorial Park

message: I seem to remember seeing on a map that Rose Hills Memorial Park is completely outside of Whittier city limits.  Given its size and its proximity to Spy Glass Hill, I want to say that it comprises the majority of Rose Hills.  Does anyone dispute this?  -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No one knows that there is a census designated place called Rose Hills. That area is called Whittier. If you say Rose Hils, people assume that you mean the cemetery. If you want to say the cemetery is in Rose Hills I would suggest adding the graveyard's permanent residents to the population total. Lars Frierson (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Community containing RHMP
Talk:Roseville High School (Roseville, California)

message: (Start/low) Needs a lot of work. Expand every section. References are needed. — Calebrw (talk) 23:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Todd and Doug Stanley - creators of The Deadliest Catch.
Scott Lindgren - award winning videographer and producer.  Outside Magazine cover.
Dustin Lindgren - X Games Bronze medal winner for videography. 2601:204:CF80:3390:703A:AE5:15D6:F15D (talk) 03:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni
File talk:Miller Swann family tree.png

message: This has been tagged for moving to commons - this would be ok but we wouldn't be able to place it in the useful category :Category:EastEnders families, which is kind of the point. –anemoneprojectors– 13:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to say I'm ok with it now :) –anemoneprojectors– 18:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Commons
Talk:Ross, California

message: I'm not sure about the strength of the introduction to this article, which consists mostly of trivia and notable residents which could easily be moved further down the article. I'm also itching to remove the Downtown section which simply lists a number of local businesses that can be found in Ross, which is unencyclopedic. Is there more information that can be added to the article about the history of Ross or various institutions contained within it? Cuffeparade 08:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak article 

message: Where is it? and why is it not included in this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.25.3 (talk) 01:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ross School 

message: Based on the contents of the linked article, it would seem like this is a different Joan Ryan.--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joan Ryan 

message: He recently moved.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.32.48 (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sean Penn

message: Uh, She's dead. Been dead for 7 years. I'm deleting her.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.229.254 (talk) 03:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lists of people associated with a place are not just for current residents or living people, unless there's a reason to establish such criteria and post it in the article. It's possible that Child's bios and articles about her have interesting and encyclopedic information about her time in Ross and about the city, itself. Editors won't look for them if they don't know that she lived here.--Hjal (talk) 08:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julia Child 
Talk:Rossmoor, Walnut Creek, California

message: * Oppose.  The Rossmoor article would not be a reasonable component of the Walnut Creek, California article.  Even at it's current size, it would be disproportionate as a neighborhood section, especially when no other neighborhoods are covered.--Hjal (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Newark High School (Delaware)

message: Stumbled across this page. Can't help but notice that the school mascot is an exact duplicate of the Georgia Tech Mascot. Including the nickname "Buzz".  I couldn't help but chuckle as I contenplated the serious nature of copyright and trademark infringement in the context of a high school. Who was the administrator who though that stealing from GATECH would be a good idea?  I wonder what the school policy dealing with plagerism is?
There's an article about Wikipedia in the October 2006 issue of Neatoday (p. 40), the magazine of the National Education Association, that mentions this article and its creator, Brent Freccia.  Grats Brent  :)  FranksValli 22:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention in Neatoday
Talk:Round Top (Contra Costa County, California)

message: the last listed external link is about a different mountain in the Lake Tahoe area  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.253.4.96 (talk) 02:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. I removed the link. Know that, when you have good data, you are encouraged to edit the article yourself. That's what Wikipedia is all about.  –droll [chat] 05:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did but my edit got fixed, I think probably because I was editing as an annonymous user (or perhaps because I didn't say why on the discussion page). I forgot my login info :-\  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.253.4.96 (talk) 20:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I see that now. RedWolf reverted your edit. It's just too easy to do when the editor is anonymous. RedWolf is a long time and prolific contributor to the project. I don't think I've ever seen him do that before but I have. I'm prone to making mistakes. It shouldn't happen but it does. I would like to suggest that you open a user account. Make sure there is something on both your user page and your user talk page. Then it would be unlikely this would happen again. Best wishes.  –droll [chat] 07:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant link 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 January 2024