Talk:Electronic waste recycling

message: This page should perhaps become a redirect to E-waste... dreddnott 04:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This topic is clearly distinguishable from electronic waste, as it refers essentially only to high-end (valuable) e-waste and only to the recycling aspect of it. Thus this topic would include features not appropriate to electronic waste and vice versa. I did not see a reason for the editor who performed the recent merge without proposing any discussion and based only on a 2006 note. I intend to expand and/or clean up both articles somewhat, so please see if they look better afterward, thanks. JJB 23:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this distinction but it is not made clear at all. Perhaps a definition section should be added. There are also 30+ mentions of 'e-waste' in the article, which (according to Electronic waste) is synonymous with electronic waste. These would have to be renamed. DarkestElephant (talk) 20:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 

message: I've asked for the subject article (which I'm still adding to bit by bit) to be Peer Reviewed for both direction and hopefully Featured List status.  Please comment? Simesa (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The key problem with this article was that there are well over 500 such refurbishment and recycling centers in the U.S. and so the "link farm" or (someday) list of Wikipedia articles simply would have been horrendously too long.  We'll have to treat recycling in the abstract, although the number of refurbishers is much smaller. Simesa (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review of [[List of personal computer refurbishment and recycling centers in the U.S.]] 

message: This link Is America Exporting a Huge Environmental Problem? (1/6/2006) seems like it belongs inside this article, but I didn't see an obvious spot. Simesa (talk) 23:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External link on Electronic Waste Sent to 3rd World

message: I have noticed that there is a general lack of the term “reuse”, one the three R’s of waste hierarchy, in this and other recycling articles. Being “green” does not mean simplistically recycling straight into raw materials. In Germany they disassemble junked cars and reuse certain parts to avoid environmentally expensive manufacturing. If you look at electronics and mainly computer recyclers, it’s tossed right into the scrapper though most non-hard drive parts are reusable and may not be manufactured anymore yet needed. It should be pointed out in the articles that many recyclers currently refuse to practice reuse thought it may be more profitable. I was trying, but could not figure how to successfully interject these concepts into these recycling articles because these articles seem to be constructed to have a one tracked focus solely on resource recovery recycling.Septagram (talk) 20:54, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reuse" concept is lacking 

message: I have completed an assessment as requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Assessment by user:Gauravjuvekar. I have raised assessment to C. A B rating is not distant but further work is required resolving tagged issues further down in the article. --Kvng (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Ironic.. (see my last edit) but what is really missing? Take out banner? Changes since December 2011 when banner put in. I notice reuse is out (wanted?). comp.arch (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lead section may not adequately".. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Computer recycling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330220509/http://www.cqpolitics.com:80/wmspage.cfm?docID=cqmidday-000003084555 to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=cqmidday-000003084555
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214204212/http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us:80/ftproot/acts/2001/htm/act1410.pdf to http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ftproot/acts/2001/htm/act1410.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090729085149/http://www.wired.com:80/politics/law/news/2003/06/59372 to http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2003/06/59372
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726022111/http://www.electronicsrecycling.org/public/NewsletterViewer.aspx?message=sent&id=40 to http://www.electronicsrecycling.org/public/NewsletterViewer.aspx?message=sent&id=40
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101229014105/http://www.netregs.gov.uk/netregs/topics/WEEE/default.aspx to http://www.netregs.gov.uk/netregs/topics/WEEE/default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified