lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Citizens for a Sound Economy

message: Are these guys the ones who helped Nadar's campain hoping it would take away votes from the Democrats in the 2004 Presidential election?
*What, did you hear that rumor from the same people that taught you how to spell Ralph Nader? 64.221.15.66 (talk) 03:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have any info on whether or not CSE has astro-turfed the Tea Party Movement, as suggested in the documentary "(Astro) Turf Wars" by Taki Oldham?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.156.135 (talk) 17:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astro-turfing the Tea Party Movement 

message: I added a dispute tag because the claim that CSE purchased the Tax Foundation in 1989 is inaccurate.  The citation provided for this claim is not sufficient (it's an article from 1989 saying that this will happen in the future, but it does not claim that it did happen.)  CSE provided financial support and shared office space with the Tax Foundation for a few years in the early 90s, but the two were always legally independent. Furthermore, there is no citation for the fact that the relationship lasted until 2004.Nkasprak (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to   — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nkasprak - do you have access to the 990's for the Tax Foundation (or CSE) from this time period?  While I they can be acquired from the IRS, since you work at the Tax Foundation, I thought you'd have easier access.  If they confirm the error, posting and citing them would forever resolve the issues with this article.--E8 (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed citation 

message: , what is the basis for your position that this is a reliable source:
* 
--Dr. Fleischman (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you link to an WP:RSN discussion on Apex? Thanks. Hugh (talk) 05:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Do I need to? It's the burden of the editor seeking to include content to establish verifiability. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 06:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draffan Apex source 
Talk:Nimrodel

message: I'm a little unclear as to why this article states that Amroth was the "last Silvan Elf Lord of Lórien". According to Amroth, he was Sindarin. (We could say "last Sindarin Lord of Lórien", working under the understanding that Celeborn, in the final analysis, is considered Telerin, but this might be somewhat confusing.) -Aranel ("Sarah") 23:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye, but wasn't Amroth also king of Lórien? So that he would be the last Sindarin King in it (or the first even)  might be more accurate. And since there are versions of there Celeborn and Galadriel-story, that Amroth is their son (unlikely), it seems even stranger that a father should succeed his soon as Lord. Hackeru  —Preceding comment was added at 10:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know from which source the information about the elf-maiden who bore two halfelven sons that became the Princes of dol Amroth? --- Hackeru
The source is most likely the Silmarillion.  I am not sure though.--Randalllin 03:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Af, found it, even thougn it appears to be "tradition" by the Dol Amrathians to say that they have an elf-maiden as ancestor, even though it is highly doubted (Tolkien did write that there were only three unions). Hackeru  —Preceding comment was added at 10:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: See above title.  Consider.  Nimrodel seems to not be featured to much and could be consider a minor place.  We can kill two birds with one edit by adding to above said article and pulling strings of wikiproject tighter.  I have already written a short entry on the above said article and will leave it at that until greater consensus.Randalllin 05:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge this article with [[Minor places in Middle-earth]]?
Talk:Jayne Ann Krentz

message: Changed "romantic" to "romance" --AmmieK 23:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The author is best known as Jayne Ann Krentz.  She is not known by her full name.  Karanacs 03:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Centrx→talk • 05:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: "With Sweet Starfire, Krentz created the futuristic romance...."  I question the accuracy of this statement.  How-ever, there is some muted support for it at http://www.thegalaxyexpress.net/2009/02/futuristic-romance-retrospective-part-i.html.  Unfortunately, this seems to be a blog, so a better confirming, modifying, or disconfirming source is needed. Kdammers (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To partially answer myself,
A Natural History of the Romance Novel 
by Pamela Regis does make the claim that Krentz pioneered the sub-genre in '86, according to a snippet of the book found at Amazon. Kdammers (talk) 02:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification needed

message: Support split - Bibliography section is long, and should be split to a new article entitled List of works by Jayne Ann Krentz.  Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of works by Jayne Ann Krentz 
Talk:WWLG

message: This is no longer the callsign for 102.5, it needs to be updated  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarsRaccoon (talk • contribs) 07:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Really, WWLG should be split from this article, as the focus of the article should remain with the station, not the frequency... as it did when the frequency changed from 101.1 to 102.5. That, or large portions of this article should be merged with WMYC, as the latter article depicts the new frequency. The station itself, however, has not stopped broadcasting online, so there is continuity of the subject material. [Note that WWLG currently redirects to WBZW.] -- JeffBillman (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Needs to be changed to WWLG
Talk:Mashrafe Mortaza

message: this needs to be merged/redirected to Mashrafe Bin Mortaza
-- Peripatetic 23:50, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emma Hardinge Britten

message: it was decided by the author not to highlight the names mentioned for links to respect peoples own beliefs and opinions but as this was a page on spirituailsm and it needed to have these mentioned so why not next to the author or one of them at least.
:I think they should be linked. It's not disrespectful. People should be able to learn about them.  --Bluejay Young 16:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added Marc Demarest's research blogs to the Further Reading section. He is a serious scholar and I believe this is one instance where a blog can be used as source material. Spiritualists and everyone interested in Emma would do well to read what he has found. --Bluejay Young (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marc Demarest research
Talk:Royal Black Institution

message: I'm 18 years old and member of the RBP but this page says the minimum age is 19...now i'm not questioning the Pat Finucane Centre ( a Roman Catholic Republican Cantre founded in memory of a man who tried to defend Terrorists) but i'd like to think that the Royal Black Institution and its members know more about it's membership requirements.
:Since there was no citation anyway, I've changed it. It would be really helpful if someone could come up with some properly cited info on this. --Helenalex (talk) 02:44, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  entry requirements 

message: Cootehill is in Cavan, not Monaghan. Culloty82 (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cootehill
Talk:Natural Bridges State Beach

message: When I went there myself, I saw only one natural bridge, but the name implies that there are more than one (hence the plural). Can anyone clear this up? --Ixfd64 00:10, 2005 August 30 (UTC)
:There used to be three, but two have since fallen, one in the mid 20th century in a storm, and one in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. --Delirium (talk) 03:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than one natural bridge? 
Talk:Beer-sheva

message: From WP:RfD:
* Beer-sheva → Beersheba -- Beer-sheva is now listed as the redirect page for Beersheba. Beer-sheva should be deleted because the proper, official and most popular (according to Google) spelling of the name of the city in Israel is Beer-Sheva and NOT Beer-sheva (not capitalized s) and also NOT Beersheba (no hyphen and second b instead of v). The article's current name (Beersheba) cannot be edited to the correct spelling (ie Beer-Sheva) without deleting Beer-sheva (which is the the badly spelt redirect) this is because of the identical spellings of Beer-sheva and Beer-Sheva. As I understand it the only solution is to delete Beer-sheva and then do the redirect. Ben Qish 05:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Wikipedian physicians

message: Well, I think this is very wonderful for those of us who believe that "information ought to be free."  When one of my patients told me she had looked at the Wikipedia epilepsy article but wished it was more helpful, I knew it was time to get to work!
How did you folks come to be editing the Wikipedia?  -Ikkyu2 00:39, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I wonder if you would consider supporting Emergency department atWikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. This department is where we all go if we are very ill, and I feel it needs a boost if it is ever to get featured article status. I would greatly appreciate if you were able to offer support on this.--File Éireann 15:50, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emergency department]] 

message: I think it would be helpful to also add a subcategory of Physician Wikipedians by specialty with further categorization of pediatric specialties...for example:
*Physician wikipedians
**Physician wikipedians by specialty
***(list of specialties)
**Pediatric physician wikipedians by specialty
***(list of pediatric specialties)
Or something to that effect...I realize that this could lead to many strings of subcategories, but it does help those looking for info on a specific topic. bcatt 23:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unnecessarily complex. Why not just:
*Physiciain Wikipedians
**Physician Wikipedians specializing in X
***X Physician Wikipedians specializing in A
***X Physician Wikipedians specializing in B
**Physician Wikipedians specializing in Y
**Physician Wikipedians specializing in Z
-Silence 23:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

text: That all makes sense, thanks. I like the idea of keeping categories general and using userboxes to define specific categories instead...only problem being that some people either don't really keep a user page, or don't pay much attention to new userboxes (or any userboxes), or actually hate userboxes (and therefore don't use them)...any suggestions? bcatt 19:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialties 

message: Does this category overlap with ? --DrGaellon (talk | contribs) 18:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It does. But it is not a duplicate, and neither can one be made a sub-cat of the other. I have provided a link from this category to . Jay (talk) 10:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlapping categories?
Talk:Zeniff

message: I tried to tell the story of Zeniff as succinctly as I could without leaving out important points. The background and aftermath sections are intentionally sparse, since the focus of this article is Zeniff, but his story only makes sense within a certain framework.
I also tried to maintain NPOV, not getting too carried away with righteousness = peace and sinfulness = destruction, which is the usual message associated with this story in (Mormon) Sunday School. Hopefully I succeeded -- if not, please revise.--andersonpd 00:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been reviewing and editing the Zeniff page due to the need for additional citations and sourced material. I have worked to improve the page’s neutrality, which occasionally called for the removal or rewording of existing information in order to maintain a NPOV. I have found sources for uncited existing material and for any new material I added. The references added were created and peer reviewed by both LDS and non-LDS scholars. After consulting with other wiki editors, we agreed on the use of literary present tense for the narrative. The interpretation section reflects different commentary from non-LDS and LDS scholars, and I made sure to differentiate these scholarly interpretations from canon. I always aim to follow Wikipedia's guidelines with my edits, but I am not perfect and acknowledge I may have missed something and/or made errors myself. I am open to discussion in my talk page about any of my edits. Rae (BYU) (talk) 22:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions
Talk:Navel gazing

message: This seems like it was written by a smug high school student enjoying their use of obscure words for the sake of it. When people think navel gazing, they think navel gazing. I believe the term occurs far more than Omphaloskepsis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.179.250 (talk) 11:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Wordy
Talk:Purple Haze

message: Actually the tritone was never banned by the Spanish Inquisition. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritone#Historical_uses
The cited sources (both are books about Jimi Hendrix) seem to have adopted this urban myth without more researching. The term diabolus in musica was never treated in a papal bull. Please correct this to avoid reproducing this myth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:424D:3901:C6D9:87FF:FECA:C8C1 (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The WP Tritone article includes several "needs additional citations for verification" tags and under the "Historical uses" section "possibly contains original research". The paragraph that mentions the Church is unreferenced, so there don't seem to be any sources that support "likely fanciful". —Ojorojo (talk) 15:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tritone
Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion/Log/Not deleted/August 2005

message: Histograms, days of commentary and days resident on TFD; 42 templates considered.
Days of commentary                    Days on TFD
 01 |=                                 01 |
 02 |                                  02 |
 03 |                                  03 |
 04 |                                  04 |
 05 |====(+12)                         05 |
 06 |====                              06 |
 07 |===                               07 |====
 08 |==                                08 |==
 09 |===                               09 |===
 10 |                                  10 |=
 11 |======                            11 |=
 12 |=                                 12 |====
 13 |===                               13 |====
 14 |                                  14 |====(+12)
 15 |                                  15 |
 16 |                                  16 |=
 17 |=                                 17 |=
 18 |=                                 18 |==
 19 |                                  19 |=
 20 |                                  20 |=
data supplemented Courtland 03:26, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistical roundup
Template talk:POV lead

message: *This template was listed on templates for deletion, but there was no consensus to delete. See the log. (archive entry) Courtland 01:15, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I've modified the template to call , which should reduce redundancy. Superm401 - Talk 17:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Made into {{tl|POV}} call

message: At the moment there is no example of the template. I had to post one to my sandbox in order to see it.
box [ICON] The neutrality of this introduction is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (April 2010)
- PrBeacon (talk) 23:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No example shown
Template talk:OriginalResearch

message: *This template was listed on templates for deletion, but there was no consensus to delete. See the log. (archive entry) Courtland 01:25, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

message: We need to add, independent references. As for a research to be somehow validated, it must used in an independent context. --Kompere 15:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed modification
Talk:List of musical band types

message: I note among the types of bands listed the entry "vocal group." And someone had renamed my article on The Gaylords to "The Gaylords (American band)" (I just changed it to "The Gaylords (American vocal group)"). It has always been my understanding that a "band" was an instrumental group, sometimes with a vocalist included, but where the vocalist was at most attached to the group. Has this usage changed? -- BRG 18:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Are vocal groups "bands"?

message: The list is about types of bands (i.e. how many people, which instruments, covers or own material, written down or improvised...) but a few genres have crept into the list, like "Ska Band". Since a ska band is basically the same as a traditional R&B, soul or funk band (i.e. a rock/pop band with a brass section), I propose to remove this (and similar entries) from the list. 84.198.246.199 (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types versus genres
Talk:Mackenzie Bowell

message: I am wondering, why did Bowell not have the title "The Right Honourable"? -- Michael Drew 01:49, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the reply below. -- Blairall (talk) 19:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rt. Hon. ? 

message: I also was wondering why some Canadian PMs (Mackenzie, Abbott, and Bowell) were not entitled to the style Right Honourable, so I wrote to the Library of Parliament, and here is the answer I received.  Fawcett5 20:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice. Would you happen to know Bowell's middle name? Albrecht 19:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why some Canadian PMs are not styled Right Honourable 

message: While I am sure my recent edit will not be accepted by either G2bambino or Lonewolf BC, can the both of you please discuss that section on the talk page, rather than constantly reverting each other? Adam Bishop 22:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appointing jurists
Talk:General Pepper

message: One piece of information that could support the dictator theory could be the Corneria emblem which features three red stars. A red star is the symbol of Communism and can be seen on the flags of other communist nations. Also considering that General Pepper's uniform is red could be some similarity of the Soviet Red army, combined with these symbols.
Should this be removed? It is just speculation and I don't think that the symbols pertain to Communism. Thunderbrand 02:08, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
:Remove it unless it can be sourced. I just removed speculative text from the Krystal (Star Fox) article that was put there by the same anon. (And, as usual, the IP was taking a guess at her age.) Jaxl | talk 02:11, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent addition

message: Should this remain its own article, or should it be merged with List of characters in the Star Fox series? PlatformerMastah 19:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno. Maybe, since there isn't a whole lot of info. on him. Thunderbrand 19:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of characters
Talk:Mick Manning

message: I'm wondering whether the links to Xavier Pick oughtn't to be confined to his article page, if only because they're not directly connected with Mick Manning. Thoughts, anyone? Rob Church Talk | Desk 02:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Mick Manning's book How Did I Begin? is referenced in this article which could be useful for anyone wishing to improve this article.--CharlieDelta (talk) 07:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reference
Talk:Yushania

message: Should descriptive quotes be added from the American Bamboo Society. On the pages for each species of Yushania? The Tollan 01:39, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005-09-14 

message: Not mentioned in article. 31.53.185.104 (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This site says that it is the common name of Yushania anceps, but there is no page about that species here yet. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "ringal" redirect here?
Talk:Disperse

message: This article has already been nominated for deletion and the result of the debate was keep.  Although i have not kept up with wikipedia policy over the past year or two, isn't it forbidden for an article to be nominated for deletion multiple times? 
Continued: I've rewritten the entire article to more accurately detail the lifespan of the band.  I feel it adequately establishes the bands notoriety- they opened for acts which at the time were nationally famous and gained an amount of "homebrew" notoriety themselves.   As said in the previous article (but not specified) they played across the midwestern united states, across several states.  I am attempting to track down internet archives of newspaper articles pertaining to the band, as well as other media that can be used as reference sources.  For the aforementioned reasons, I'm going to go ahead and take down the notability tag that has been added to the article.
Last of all, I've fixed a few "edits" made to the article by a bot (for one thing, the bot changed "music" to "musicals" and amended several dates to 100 years prior or ten years later.)69.133.96.66 (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goaria language

message: According to the Ethnologue, Goari is an alternate name for the Sadri language. ♠ DanMS 03:07, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but according to the Ethnologue, Goaria is a language spoken in Pakistan. I'm rewriting the article accordingly. --Angr/ 20:56, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:A Gathering of Eagles

message: Just in case anyone thinks this is a copyvio from , I wrote that several years ago.--Rogerd 03:29, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
A good start. I've added a Plot section that I reconstructed from my own memory of my many viewings of this suprisingly enjoyable film.--Temlakos 16:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Recently, User:63.3.14.130 complained in the article that the aircraft featured in the arrival of "Happy Jack" Kirby should have been a DC-3.  I agreed and edited the article.  In retrospect, given the era, a DC-3 would have been unlikely.  (A DC-3 did land at the beginning of Strategic Air Command (film)).  I don't think the aircraft ID is critical to the plot and have removed refs to both types of aircraft until we get some resolution.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 19:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft ID 

message: The film may have been released in 1963, but wasn't filming at Beale done in 1962?  That would have meant that the units at Beale were under the 4126th Strategic Wing.  Universal paid for a swimming pool at the alert facility at the end of the runway (personal knowledge on my part, but if anyone can confirm from a reliable source it could be added to the section on SAC cooperation.) --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All true, but since the film was not released until June 1963, by which time the 4126th SAW had been relegated to history, and the equipment and many of the personnel were still with the 456th at Beale, the attribution to the latter makes more sense.--Reedmalloy (talk) 15:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Wing?
Talk:Hafler Trio

message: I've removed the discography, which was lifted from here, and will rewrite a cleaner version, covering the major releases, shortly. Cnwb 03:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Older discussion