Talk:Sight and Sound

message: The copyrights of the "top film" lists are probably owned by the BFI, and that organization holding a Royal Charter, this may well be Crown Copyright.  In any case, we should probably remove them as copyright infringements.  They're available on the BFI site to anyone who wants to see them. --Tony Sidaway 14:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The last list in the article was incorrectly labeled as the "Top Films of the Past 25 Years (2002 List)." The list is labeled on the magazine's website as the "Critic's Top Ten Poll" for 2002. I've fixed the title. TennysonXII (talk) 05:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Top film lists

message: Why Louisiana Story is not in the 1952 poll  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.184.198.26 (talk) 06:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Louisiana Story

message: I want to split this article into an article on the poll and another article on the magazine. Responses? JoshuSasori (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is sensible. There are specific articles for the last two polls. Sudiani (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

text: This is not only sensible but necesarry, the sections of the different polls are bigger than parts about the magazine itself BJI904000 (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article 

message: This paragraph is misplaced under the heading The Sight & Sound Poll of the Greatest Films of All Time:
Sight & Sound has in the past been the subject of criticism, notably from Raymond Durgnat, who often accused it of elitism, puritanism and snobbery, although he did write for it in the 1950s, and again in the 1990s.[3][4] The magazine's American counterpart is Film Comment, a magazine published by the Film Society of Lincoln Center in New York City.[5] It has also been accused of populism in recent years.[6]
NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 01:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I had moved this already. Sudiani (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced paragraph 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:35, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sight & Sound →  – The magazine did away with the ampersand on its cover since the September 2021 issue. Now the website refers to it as "Sight and Sound". So do NYT, Guardian, BBC, Telegraph, Independent, Vulture, CBS, and Vox. Nardog (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

text: This is correct. The title should be Sight and Sound, without the ampersand.  SoCal01 (talk) 01:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 December 2022 

message: There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Template:Sight_and_Sound_Poll about the deletion of the navbox. This page was not notified that the deletion attempt was even in progress, a discussion closed with little discussion after input from three editors (two to delete, with easily debatable reasoning, and one to keep). Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Sight and Sound'' poll navbox deleted