Talk:Shari Redstone

message: The following text was lifted from the Viacom Web site:
:Shari Redstone
:Non-Executive Vice Chair of the Board
:Ms. Redstone is Non-Executive Vice Chair of the Company’s Board of Directors, a position to which she was elected as of January 1, 2006. She also serves as Non-Executive Vice Chair of the Board of CBS Corporation, a predecessor of the Company. Ms. Redstone served on the Board of the former Viacom Inc., a predecessor of the Company, since 1994. She has been President of National Amusements, Inc., since January 2000, and prior to that, served as Executive Vice President of National Amusements since 1994. Ms. Redstone practiced law from 1978 to 1993, with her practice including corporate law, estate planning and criminal law. Ms. Redstone is a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee for the National Association of Theatre Owners, Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of MovieTickets.com, Inc., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CineBridge Ventures, Inc. and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rising Star Media. Ms. Redstone is a member of the board of several charitable organizations, including the Board of Trustees at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, the Board of Directors at Combined Jewish Philanthropies and the Board of Directors of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation. Ms. Redstone is also a director of National Amusements and Vice Chairwoman of Midway Games Inc.
—QuicksilverT @ 18:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: https://www.fiercecable.com/video/cbs-challenges-national-amusements-bylaw-changes
http://deadline.com/2018/05/cbs-delaware-court-reject-bylaw-change-shari-redstone-national-amusements-1202396322/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/23/business/media/cbs-legal-war.html
Some reports were made in May 2018 that Shari Redstone and National Amusements were sued by CBS over the CBS Viacom talks and who got control of CBS specifically.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.130.165 (talk) 22:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Shari Redstone named in a lawsuit in 2018

message: I don't mind a short and to-the-point article like this, but the Viacom and CBS tags overwhelm it by taking up such an enormous amount of screen real estate. --Zippy 17:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  viacom and cbs tags overwhelm short articles like this 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Shari Redstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131123062617/http://www.forbes.com:80/profile/shari-redstone/ to http://www.forbes.com/profile/shari-redstone/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: So, instead of violating WP:3RR, take it to the talk page, or WP:AN3. I'm requesting the page be protected due to the persistent edit warring. That is unless I can an agreement that you'll both stop the revert war, and figure this out in a civil manner. Boomer VialHolla 23:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: On Item #1 107 says Ira A. Korff is a redlink but what's the difference anyway when it references him with both names and the Ira Korff goes right to the Yitzhak Aharon Korff article?  So who cares if Ira A. Korff is a red link when immediately after you have a link? Can we also address items #2 and #3?  ChosidFrumBirth (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning recent reverted edits 

message: STATEMENT FROM SHARI REDSTONE ON SUCCESSION
Los Angeles, CA – “As Vice Chair of CBS Corp. and Viacom, Inc., and as President of National Amusements, Inc. (the controlling shareholder of CBS and Viacom), my singular focus is to act in the companies’  best interests by ensuring that each company has a strong Chair, a Board of Directors which diligently oversees management, and an outstanding leadership team.  
As has been accurately reported, my father’s Trust states his intention that I succeed him as (non-executive) Chair at CBS and Viacom, and also names me as a Trustee after his death.   However, it is my firm belief that whoever may succeed my father as Chair at each company should be someone who is not a Trustee of my father’s trust or otherwise intertwined in Redstone family matters, but rather a leader with an independent voice. I was honored to nominate Les as the CBS Chair and am delighted to congratulate him on his new position. He follows in the visionary tradition of my father, and I know that Les will successfully lead CBS into the digital future.” 
Czhan (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 10 February 2016 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shari Redstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.viacom.com/aboutviacom/Pages/boardofdirectors.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130701043857/http://www.natoonline.org/statisticscircuits.htm to http://www.natoonline.org/statisticscircuits.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm not an expert on Wikipedia editing policy, so I don't know what needs to occur to remove a statement that cannot be independently substantiated. However, I think that some editor, who does know, should remove the dubious, un-referenced comment at the end of this section. It's fairly absurd to contend that Sumner cutting his daughter out of his trust was a method of showing he wanted her to become Chairman. Most Wall Street stock analysts contend that it meant quite the opposite; especially considering their feud prior to his death (at which time he was known to have changed his trust to remove her). 
This statement has quite likely been authored by Shari, her x-husband, or someone who is paid to represent their interests. Part of her current legal battle with CBS & Viacom attempts to use this absurd rationale, which is likely why she wants it included in the article. If we're going to allow Ms. Redstone control of the article's content to promote herself and eliminate all honest criticism, then it's almost useless to allow this article to continue to exist.
: I've chopped it out. For the record the sole reason I looked at this page was because I was trying to trace the insanely complicated history of Atari. Even before reading this talk page the line stood out as odd - it seems obvious that Sumner Redstone cut his daughter out of his will. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of dubious claim in 1990-2016 section 

message: I disagree with the ViacomCBS name because back when Viacom merged with CBS in 2000, they were just called "Viacom". Can you please write to Mrs. Redstone to change ViacomCBS's name to Viacom?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:197:C181:B70:A1B2:E72A:1F54:C01F (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing ViacomCBS's name to just "Viacom" 

message: No award programs air on more than one or two channels. To excessively broadcadt on six channels is excessive. Seriously, even Nic, Tvland and Comede Central channel? Isn't BET, VH1 and MTV enough? 50.26.134.67 (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is 2022 BET Awards excessively being broadcasted on 6 cable channels?