Talk:Intercontinental Cup records and statistics

message: It provides the same function (decides the best team team in the world). The only difference is that FIFA took it over and added the other confederations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSonicx1986 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is like saying that we should merge the articles on the Premier League and the Football League First Division. I mean, the Premier League performs the same function as the First Division did until 1992... Of course, I'm being sarcastic :) – PeeJay 09:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't we merge the Intercontinental Cup & the CWC? 

message: good cuestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.77.24.19 (talk) 
:Both, Boca won the Intercontinental Cup, Corinthians won the Club World Cup. Later CWC's replaced IC's altogether, but that was the one year when both were played. The table should be clearer about which is which, though. --Gabbec 12:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Humm, the table is incomplete right now, since it is displaying only the IC's result in 2000, leaving the CWC out altogether.  Particularly bad, since the article's title explicitly states that it is a combined statistic.  I'll include the result, format can always be reviewed if needed.  Redux (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOCA JUNIORS or CORINTHIANS in 2000?? 

message: Someone is removing all the soccer club logos from each championship page. The person who is doing this claims that "Fair Use" is not for ilustrating. I totally disagree with him beacuse the reason why people put images and logos and everything on a encyclopedia is to ilustrate and make the information clear. Another point is that if the image is already hosted in wikipedia and used on the soccer clubs pages, why can't we use it also on the competitions page like this?
The one who removes the logos is cleary misinterpretating the "Fair Use" rules. What do you people think about this subject?
This the copyright message for club logos. Ilustrations are ok by the rules below:

--Mrzero 21:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. You can see logos on all pages about soccer championships. And the rules are pretty clear about this issue.FTota 13:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All see WP:FUC. Use on the original page is fine, use as decoration, or in templates is not. ed g2s • talk 15:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club logos removal 

message: Does anyone oppose moving this to Intercontinental Cup and FIFA Club World Cup statistics, considering the tournament has been renamed? --Gabbec 17:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Actually it's the right thing to do. —Lesfer (t/c/@) 15:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ;) —Lesfer (t/c/@) 15:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

text: No. FIFA won't "remove" it, anon. —Lesfer (t/c/@) 15:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move 

message: Now that 1951 Copa Rio is regognized as a World Club Championship and some of its statistics are being added in here, shouldn't we move article's name again? Maybe "World Club Championships statistics" os something like that? —Lesfer (t/c/@) 16:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see why a change would be needed. According to this document, the Copa Rio is recognized as the first official "Club World Cup", which still fits one of the two denominations given in the article's current name. I would like to see an official FIFA press release making this clear, though, since I haven't seen anything about this on their website. --Gabbec 18:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New move

message: Why do the media (GMX and Kicker) stress the claim that, by Manchester winning 2008, Europe equalized 23:23? --Rheinländer (talk) 14:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because bullshit sells money. There are many idiots in Europe and the US who will believe anything someone making a little bit of money says.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gethomas3 (talk) 15:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  By continent 

message: http://www.fifa.com/clubworldcup/news/newsid=2248557/index.html
Exactly 37 years to the day since collecting their first honours on the global stage, Bayern are aiming to climb to the top of the world for the third time in three attempts. Muller and Munich fans everywhere are crossing their fingers and hoping it comes off. "I’m wishing the team plenty of success at the Club World Cup 2013," Der Bomber said, "and I hope they bring the trophy back to Munich for the third time after 1976 and 2001."
Any other reason to put together all the world campions from 1960 to 2013?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebersecker (talk • contribs) 10:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the competitions are not the same and their records will not be merged. – PeeJay 14:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intercontinental Cup winners are official World Champions for FIFA