Talk:Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis

message: Reply:
You didn't tag this page, did you?
uhm the last section on modding is EXTREMELY unproffesional and should be cleaned up.
:Almost as unprofessional as your grammar, spelling and Wikipedia editing.  No, the modding will not be cleaned up, as it is an older game, and makes the game interesting once again.--WhereAmI 04:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:JPOG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:JPOG.jpg

message:  - add to your page. ----- Cuddly Panda Blab (Non-wiki) | Contribs | 13:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: I really think it's stupid that the game Jurassic Park Operation Genesis, that their are no Pteradons. Like in Jurassic Park III, the huge bird cage was awsome, so why can't you build one in the game?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.124.220 (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pteradons 

message: IP's 98.195.226.38 and 2601:e:1680:8c4:618e:4895:ebf7:7d3b both seem hellbent on reverting the article to a vandalized and (in my opinion, at least) overall worse-structured version. You can see the differences between my edit and the one the IPs are arguing for here. Dromaeosaurus is best dinosaur 22:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Note, for anybody who still keeps tabs on this page

message: Here is a good reliable reference for a possible 'development' section if an editor wants to tackle it one day in the future. DrNegative (talk) 01:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added link to template above. DrNegative (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for a possible 'Development' section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dansjp3page.com/index2.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://dansjp3page.com/oldnews49.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamerspulse.com/interviews/5063/index.shtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dansjp3page.com/oldnews52.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think the section, "Fan Modification", should be removed from this article of Wikipedia for multiple reasons.
1. It contains possible original research. Even if it may be true, the content should be from a reliable official source.
2. It contains content from unreliable sources, such as user/fan-labored forums.
3. The overal content of the section is what I believe is unnecessary for a Wikipedia article.
Gabeluna27 (talk) 08:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Fan Modification" section request for article?