Talk:.cx

message: what is TLD? --Jeroenemans 20:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Top-level domain. *Dan T.* 22:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2006 comment 

message: This article is about the TLD, not the domains contained within it. .com does not have info on google.com, .us does not have info on del.icio.us, why should .cx have info on goatse.cx? I have removed the reference once again from the .cx page. -Henry W. Schmitt 06:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have said before, putting a reference to Goatse adds nothing to this article. If you happen to know this piece of trivia, so be it. Keep it in your head. US Weekly is number one on Google for a query of "US", out of eight billion pages. --Henry W. Schmitt (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

text: *One could argue, however, that simply searching for "US" will bring American websites from all over; not just from the .us domain extension.  "cx" is not a common string, and has nothing to do with Christmas Island aside from their TLD.  72.147.134.134 (talk) 08:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference to Goatse.cx seems to me to be clearly relevant to a top-level domain whose only well known domain is that particular website. ImperviusXR (talk) 13:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goatse 

message: I object to using the web archive links as a reference. From WP:Reliable sources: "Primary sources are not considered reliable for statements of interpretation, analysis or conclusion unless the that [sic] specific interpretation, analysis or conclusion is explicitly stated in the primary source..." The date is not given on the page itself, and the conclusion that the page has existed on that page since that date is something that comes from analysis of the URL, something which from my personal experience can be exploited, since archive.org URLs sometimes automatically redirect to the nearest available date.
As well, the majority of the references are to archive.org, implying that the topic has no notability itself. If this was the case, then it does not deserve its own Wikipedia article. If it's not the case, why are 75% of the references on this page about a topic which has its own Wikipedia article? Those references would belong on that page, not this one, with a link at the top of the relevant section indicating that the main article, which goes into more detail than the section itself, is at that page.
In closing, the archive sources are not reliable, and even if they were, they don't belong on this article, as they give WP:undue weight to a specific topic which already has a much larger article. --68.161.138.123 (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web archive links 

message: Note any possible attraction of sex sites to chose .cx domains because the pronunciation of "cx" is close to "sex". Jidanni (talk) 03:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation close to "sex" 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.cocca.cx/policies/doc/crs_sept_20_2006.doc
** In .cx on 2011-05-20 21:41:54, 404 Not Found
** In .cx on 2011-05-31 13:20:14, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link