Talk:Heartland Baptist Bible College

message: One or more editors have been trying to remove information about an alumnus of this college using edit summaries such as "Information not conducive to the reputation of the institution represented on this page. No valid proof or source cited." and "Content not conducive to reputation of insitution. No valid sources cited."  First and foremost, we do not remove or censor information to protect the reputation of subjects.  Second, there are two reliable sources cited in the section and one even explicitly mentions this college as part of the background of the alumnus in question. ElKevbo (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of information because it's negative about the college 

message: So I’ve tried several times to improve this page by adding relevant information with citations from the institution itself, and it always reverts back. Isn’t that I violation of terms of service? I edited as a joke to test this feature and it reverted in less than 30 minutes. The thing I added was that it’s a cult and they use forced labor as punishment to enforce draconian rules including everyone has to be out of bed with chores done by 7:15 and no one can watch movies. Those aren’t even the most insane, just the beginning. Guys and girls can’t even high five. All that is true, and more. My source is students who left and never looked back. 67.129.8.225 (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your edit and I am definitely not a bot. I appreciate you trying to improve the article, but it seems like your edits are getting reverted because you are not familiar with policies regarding how to write an article. Your edit was not constructive, not cited, and did not represent a neutral point of view. I am not familiar with this college, but if what you're saying is accurate, it should be reflected in the article by referencing reliable sources and in a neutral manner. Additionally, what you're saying above represents original research which is not permitted - it must come from a third-party source. dizzyflamingo (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @67.129.8.225 should have pinged you dizzyflamingo (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah no this one was a joke. Previous edits get pulled just as fast regardless of citation. It definitely is a cult, and there’s lots of third party citations I could use. I also have citations for their forced labor practices. Are you associated with the school? You say you’re not, but you seemed to be pretty quick to pull a critical addition. The rest of the page seems edited in a very pro-HBBC manner with atrocious and irrelevant citations, yet whenever I’ve corrected them, someone reverts it. Almost like someone is censoring any undesirable information. Which is very on brand for this cult. 67.129.8.194 (talk) 19:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I am definitely not affiliated with the school, I live in Canada. Please edit the article in a neutral manner and ensure you are citing reliable sources and you may find that your edits don't get reverted. dizzyflamingo (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @67.129.8.225 Wikipedia has many users who voluntarily monitor changes and remove vandalism and/or uncited info. This is why your changes are getting reverted so quickly. Please read up on some of the policies I've linked above. dizzyflamingo (talk) 19:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  There’s gotta be some sort of bot watching this page