lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ixodes holocyclus

message: #||||||||
#|||||||| doi = 10.1016/0041-0101(66)90003-1
}}
#|||||||| 	
#|| title = Cardiovascular effects of the toxin(s) of the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus, in the rat
||||||
#||||||||
#||||||||
#|||||||| doi = 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00006-5
}}
--Stone 19:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This is a really great article.Congratulations to all who have contributed. I have to wonder why it is still rated "Stub" class.Mark Marathon (talk) 11:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone is able to re-rate the talk page templates. Alot of editors never bother. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Great article

message: What appears to be needed to complete this great article is a more extensive description of the the how long the symptoms persist after removal.  There is a mention of that envenoming may continue to be effective for up to 24 to 48 hours after removal, however if significant numbness is present (in humans this is a common symptom that can result in the localised area being completely without feeling; the size of the are depending on the amount of time the tick has been attached).
We should aim to understand how long these symptoms will continue to last or are they indeed permanent.
Further it is known that the paralysis tick often attaches itself behind the victims ear.   Now is it coincidence that  the numbness inflicted by the tick at this location is almost identical to the effect of damaging the lesser occipital nerve.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adel314 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  After effects of Paralysis and Numbness missing 

message: "... patients with suspected Lyme-like Disease should be treated with an appropriate course of antibiotics because early treatment of Lyme Disease invariably results in a complete cure."
As one with ongoing difficulties from a Lyme-like disease, yes, begin treatment as soon as you possibly can; no, a complete cure is not the invariable outcome.
There is much disagreement of ongoing symptoms and the identification of proper treatments.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:4400:3600:299D:58A:CCC2:BD2B (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not True  

message: The pictured tick does not appear to be a paralysis tick. It's too dark and the mouth is too short, and the legs are not colour-patterned correctly. I see this tick lower down wallabies on their back and in possum ears. It's softer than a p-tick, but it seems to be irritating. I cannot find the name of it. I have seen millions of ticks, because I've preened my pet wallabies for 20 years, and indeed myself. However, since the top of the tick is not visible, I'm not confident enough to call it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.186.225.250 (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  not paralysis tick
Talk:Laugh Factory

message: Haven't several comedians publicly stated they wouldn't perform at the Laugh Factory anymore, due to its censorship policy? --208.65.188.23 (talk) 03:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comic boycotting?

message: The links before today's edit were dead and have been removed, leaving some information to be questionable.
*The second Chappelle and Cook's records is not found and needs verification.  
*Owner and dates should be verified from other than primary sources. 
*Comic Strip:Live's renaming should be checked as the article linked to it doens't mention it nor does its own references... that I could find.
CaptainMorgan (talk) 05:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Dispute

message: This section needs to be a lot better explained. What exactly does "longest single set" mean? Seems to me the show Seinfeld used the word "set" to refer to an appearance at a club - surely a 7:34 appearance is notably short, not notably long, so what exactly does this mean, and why is it significant? Nosleep break my slumber 21:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Endurance Record" 

message: Neutrality dispute added to this section for obvious reasons. 69.143.182.138 (talk) 07:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petition to Bail Out Comedy 

message: I cleaned this story up a (significant) bit so that it now says just the bare minimum. If one wants to know more then they are requested to visit the laugh factory's own site. Miep2 (talk) 21:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: This article looks like it is written by a PR-employee of the company. That undermines the reliability. The Banner talk 08:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Devata

message: In Slavic "nine" is DEV(iet), and 9 represented before Christianity also a sacred, holy number of Gods or "world of gods", which is also Norse "Ygdrasil". Baltic and Slavic calendar knew also week of 9 days (and not 7).  Woman in Slavic is "Deva or Devushka"(also a virgin), which contains "divno"(divine) or "godly" nature of women.
This shows "northern" European&Russian (Aryan) influence among Khmer, Javanese, Balinese, Sundanese, Malay and Indonesian people.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.182.91.242 (talk) 14:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavic, Baltic and Norse "Nine world of the gods"(Ygdrasil) 

message: I've reverted your edit regarding the first line, because the term devata is not only in Hindu mythology, but also in Buddhist mythology. You can find them in many suttas across buddhist text. Also there is no another page for Devata in Buddhism.( there is page for Deva, but Both the terms are different). If you still think, I'd done something wrong, you can state your reason below. Please don't edit regarding this until we reach the final conclusion, since discussion is going on.JaMongKut (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devata
Talk:Parastacidae

message: The .png version of the Parastacidae map is currently inaccurate, thus the .svg map is superior. If you still feel like keeping the .png version, please rectify the following errors before reverting:
# The northern populations of Cherax are missing. Please include them in the .png.
# The range of Euastacus is missing from Western Australia. Please include it in the .png.
# Consider whether the population of Paranephrops claimed for Fiji is worth indicating.
More on that last: The article notes that Huxley makes this claim. In his scientific memoirs (available here, at Google Books), he indicates that the two specimens at the British Museum were in poor condition. I can find no indication whether or not he was the one to actually collect them. So it's possible that they were also mislabeled or so degraded that he misidentified them. In the subsequent 130 years since Huxley published, there have been 0 reports of freshwater crayfish for the Fiji islands. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution Map
Talk:Paratrechina

message: A number of species in Paratrechina were moved to  Nylanderia.  I removed one or two that I knew of, but someone needs to read the below reference to see others. 
LaPolla JS, Brady SG, Shattuck SO. 2010. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Prenolepis genus-group of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Systematic Entomology 35 (1): 118-131. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 23:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New genus
Talk:Paratya

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Parcoblatta fulvescens

message: Here in North Carolina I caught many P. virginica.  Adult females vary in colour often, while P. fulvescens adult females I have not seen so much variation on online pictures, and with experience with a couple individuals I've seen.  P. virginica adult females can be very light colour to very dark colour (kind of close to P. uhleriana adult females often are). Happy1892 (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: P. virginica not as variable in colour?
Talk:Odontotaenius disjunctus

message: Probably worth mentioning the interesting family sttructure of these in which both dad and mom care for the offsprings  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.127.206.63 (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monogamous 

message: — Assignment last updated by ReeseWB (talk) 13:45, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: General Entomology
Talk:Paul Allen's flower fly

message: Is the host supposed to be "Senecio"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.70.234 (talk) 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tetramorium immigrans

message: Apparently as of 2017 the T. caespitum complex now distinguishes T. immigrans as the only species in the complex to have been introduced to north america. See e.g.
https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Tetramorium_caespitum
https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Tetramorium_immigrans
https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/images/5/56/Wagner%2C_H.C.%2C_Arthofer%2C_W._et_al._2017._Light_at_the_end_of_the_tunnel_-_Integrative_taxonomy_delimits_cryptic_species_in_the_Tetramorium_caespitum_complex.pdf
...it seems as if this article needs to be updated to reflect that detail. E.g. a paragraph about taxonomy, and a sentence explaining that T. caespitum isn't in N.A., but the closely related species is?
I'm not an ant expert or I'd do it myself. Any takers?
Chconnor (talk) 06:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 14:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pavement ant →  – Correcting an incorrect page move to a common name that applies to several species in the genus. This name is also prominently applied to T. caespitum. Lhikan634 (talk) 13:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 June 2021
Talk:Odontodactylus scyllarus

message: How much does this creature weigh??? Thank you!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.20.185.61 (talk) 01:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight??? 

message: What does this mean? As a physicist this seems to be nonsense, and I’m not sure what a layperson would take from this. This should be reworded. I don’t want to do so myself however because I’m not an expert on mantis shrimp! Jaredjeya (talk) 06:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “The dactyl club is the most electron-dense region of the stomatopod exoskeleton”
Talk:Tuckerella

message: The article says "They possess five to seven pairs of whip-like setae which are used to defend themselves against predators. They may also help in windborn dispersal."  Can a reference be found for either of these stated purposes?  Also, what are the natural predators of the Peacock mite?  That should be added to the article as well.  Johntex\talk 01:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, I think think the wording of the sentence “They may also help in wind-borne dispersal.” is confusing and ambiguous.  Does the word “They” refer to the setae, or to the mites?  Does this sentence mean that these setae may help in the dispersal of the mites, or does it mean that the mites may help in the dispersal of something else (such as pollen, perhaps)? — Bob Blaylock (talk) 07:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Whips

message: "An important pest"? Sounds funny. Does that mean ecologically important, or what? --JianLi 03:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. That Jason 05:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: same --71.252.93.126 08:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An important pest 

message: Nice pic. It would be nice to know how *big* this beastie is tho'...Snori 11:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How big?
Talk:Pergidae

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Perga sp. AF 2 edit1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 21, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-05-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 16:26, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Perga sp. AF 2 edit1.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Permotipula

message: As of June 2011, the article indicates that the fly wing was found in late Permian beds, based on the cited source which says Upper Permian. However, Natalia von Ellenrieder in her article "Diptera (Mosquitoes, Midges, and Flies)" in Grzimek's Animal Life Encyclopedia: Volume 3: Insects page 357 says that it was from the Upper Triassic.  That is quite a discrepancy. It seems that Natalia von Ellenrieder is the one in error, but such an error is disturbing in a reliable source.  I checked other sources and they indicate that the fossil was found in the Newcastle Coal Measures, an Upper Permian set of beds.  --Bejnar (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict in dating
Talk:Phacopidae

message: The name of one of the genera provides a puzzle. Three variants are in use. The one that makes etymologically most sense would be Sambremeusaspis (Shield found at the Sambre and Meuse rivers), e.g. in G.D,. Edgecombe (1991). The Silurian Dalmanitid Trilobite Glytambon Holloway: New Species from Tennessee and Illinois. Journal of Paleontology 63(2):294-300. Most commonly is used Sambremeuaspis Lespérance, 1988, e.g. in the Global Names Index and George P. Hansen (2009). Trilobites of Black Cat Mountain. iUniverse. Finally, also in the Global Names Index is mentioned Sambremeusapis fossesensis Lespérance, 1987. So it seems there is also confusion about the publication date. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 10:16, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep in mind anything other then a cited etymology from the author is not valid to add to wiki, as it constitutes original research.--Kevmin § 15:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Sambremeu''something 
Talk:Vicky Austin

message: I am reclassing this to Start class as of my edit of tonight, but of course it still has a long way to go. Also, "Low" importance dos not seem right for a character who has appeared in eight of L'Engle's books, and is the first person protagonist of five of them, three of them award-winning novels.  I've upgraded it to Mid importance - hope nobody minds! Karen | Talk | contribs 00:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Justin Harrell

message: This article has horrible Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View and WP:TONE.  This requires clean-up.Professor Davies 01:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge Lack of NPOV 
Talk:Phacops

message: Should Phacops caudatus be on the list of species or is it no longer considered a species?Geni (talk)
:Phacops caudatus is now assigned to Dalmanites, while the original combination was Trilobus caudatus. Cherio, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 18:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Phacops caudatus

message: Is there a reason why Phacops africanus isn't mentioned? I stumbled across it here: :s:Page:South African Geology - Schwarz - 1912.djvu/151 --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of species is nowhere complete, that, and we should be sure that P. africanus hasn't bee referred to another genus like several other notable species, like "Phacops rana" being moved to Eldgreops.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I can't access any of the new publications that mention the species, so this will have to wait until someone can read up on the status. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: See Eldredgeops. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks! --Tobias1984 (talk) 18:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Phacops africanus'' 

message: As Eldredgeops rana is no longer in Phacops, the images should be changed to actual Phacops specimens. This can get confusing- especially to someone who may only be skimming over the article if they are unaware of the change. Photos of the eye lenses would be extremely beneficial too. RealGatba (talk) 01:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phacops rana
Talk:Eldredgeops rana

message: "The slightest amount of sediment would trigger their senses, and Phacops rana would be hidden in a tiny shelter made of its own body. Although this safety feature often helped them to evade predators, occasionally it backfired and the trilobite would be buried under heavy sediment. Their fossils can still be found in balled-up positions 400 million years later."
Isn't that highly speculative? It's hard to judge how sensitive a creature's senses were when said creature went extinct 251 million year ago. Fossils of curled-up Trilobites might have occured like this, but I think it's a bit much to leap and use it to explain all curled-up fossils. 01:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be merged into Phacops. FunkMonk (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Phanaeus vindex

message: Isn't that an african dung beetle? arent rainbow scarabs alot more colorful?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by IvanTortuga (talk • contribs) 02:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture confusion

message: — Assignment last updated by Sachi.sb (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2024

message: This entry about the Phanaeus vindex, or the rainbow scarab, does a great job at providing detailed information about the rainbow scarab’s food sources, life history, mating, and development information. The prose of this entry is also very clear and understandable. The entry also does a great job of providing citations at the end of each paragraph. However for some larger paragraphs, like the second paragraph in the Mating section, it could help clarify where the information is referenced by including the citation in the middle of the paragraph as well. Some things to consider for further improvement include adding information about the beetle’s habitat, geographic range, and its interaction with humans. The lead section can also be lengthened. Usually, for an entry of this length, it is nice to include a lead section of around 3 paragraphs to let readers know what this entry will cover. 
Here are some edits I made: 
*Added hyperlinks to certain terms to better integrate this article into Wikipedia. 
*Added an image of the beetle to increase the media content. 
*Added citations to larger paragraphs with only one citation at the end to help readers understand where the information is from. 
*Italicized species name where it wasn’t italicized. 
Justinxuje (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback
Talk:Calvin O'Keefe

message: I will add a citation or two, but it is inaccurate to say that this article does not cite any references or sources.  Nearly every paragraph cites the novels from which the material comes, complete with ISBN.  If one wants secondary sources, that is certainly desirable, but the article as it stands is far from unreferenced. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 06:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References or sources
Talk:Griddharaj Parvat

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: There are many problems with this article.
0. First I am basing this on Google Maps, which obviously has problems in this area, as several places are incorrectly labeled (Ramnagar is located in what is pictured to be a lake - unless flooding is the cause - it must be wrong)
1. The coordinates given are close to a hill/ridge which Google Maps Identifies as Griddhraj Parvat but is 17 km ENE of where Google locates Ramnagar, Madhya Pradesh and 53 km ESE of Satna. It is close to where Google locates BiHarganj (2 km North of Biharganj).
2. The location →described← in the article appears on Google Maps (apparently) as a lone hill with an attached photo labeling it "gidhaila hill, ramnagar" and is 4.5 km N of where supposedly Ramnagar is and 49 km from Satna.  This hill's coordinates are roughly 24°14'50"N and 81°09'18 E.
Both of these locations are consistent with part of the article and inconsistent with other parts.
I have no opinion on which is correct, or both, or neither, but the placement requires further work and confirmation. Please add the Pradesh when identifying town/village names.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abitslow (talk • contribs) 20:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed: Vulture Peak is in Rajgir, Bihar --Christophe Dioux (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location is incorrect - Edit Request
Talk:Beewolf

message: Proust mentions these (Guêpe fouisseuse), and I wondered how he knew (read a book, I guess). A distribution section is always useful on an animal page, but maybe a bit superfluous here, for me, as you mention Europe. FangoFuficius (talk) 09:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution
Talk:Himavat

message: not sure why my edit was removed.
himavat has no meaning. it's like jesu instead of jesus.
himavata is the correct original word/name. 
Sanskrit is a retroflexive language. all of the words end in vowels.In fact Sanskrit is a Hindi/English word. The real name for Sanskrit is Sanskrutam. I digress. My point is, why would you revert my correct spelling?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.222.145 (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)