lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boston Acoustics

message: Reason for removing proposed deletion tag:
Boston Acoustics meets Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations)#Criteria for companies and corporations Criterion #1: it is the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.
PC World: http://msn.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,124909,00.asp
USA Today:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/edwardbaig/2006-01-25-hd-radio_x.htm
Fg2 05:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Loudguy, Wikipedia welcomes improvements both to the existing articles and as new articles. If you know more about Boston Acoustics, or can write about other companies, it would be a valuable addition. Fg2 07:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm surprised this article is only a stub, I thought they were a fairly known company, when I get some time I'll see if I can add anything. Azgard 74.33.232.213 23:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Possum Dixon

message: Added information about their self-released 5-song cassette EP from 1991... I found it at a Goodwill store in Florissant, MO this past weekend (!)
A cite about the heroin usage might be useful. Andrewhime 01:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bakht Khan

message: I just heavily edited this page for grammar and clarity reasons. I don't know enough about the subject to put in links or sources, but it would be great if someone who does could. -Segregold (talk) 16:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edit

message: The last mugahl emperor  was deported to  Rangoon 2001:8F8:153F:7645:C8C3:A1A4:6327:E39D (talk) 18:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social sciences  Rangoon
Talk:Party hat

message: It's not polite to tag an article for cleanup without providing some reason as to why, but hopefully, the reasons are rather obvious. As it currently reads, the article appears to imply that the concepts is intimately linked with role-playing games. There is no historical background, which is often what distinguishes an encyclopaedic article from a dictionary definition. There are no illustrations of real party hats or the origami figure. There is no attempt to delimit the definition. (For example, is a graduation cap considered a party hat?) —LX 06:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The notability of this topic is currently not clear. On the formal side, the article does not cite any references or sources, and therefore fails the notability guideline WP:N. On the other hand side, it seems to me that the videogame-related part might better be merged into RuneScape, if it's relevant there, and the other part maybe to a different article. 
In any case: For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 12:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: I think we should get some pictures for the game partyhats.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.60.170.73 (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion
Talk:Time of flight

message: This article could use a section describing the reflectron and delayed extraction.
Jason Dunsmore 06:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a single sentence article linked by Time-of-flight and Ion mobility spectrometer. --Kkmurray 23:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No strong objections. I would tend to keep it as a stub but it is awfully short. I could see a moderate size article explaining the details of this but perhaps it should be pulled out of the larger TOF and IMS articles once it more filled out. There is the issue of a redirect since it should really redirect to two different places. I would keep for that reason alone and then link to both in the stub.--Nick Y. 17:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The dual link thing is a problem. And if a Hadamard transform MS article gets written, that would be three links. Ion mobility seems to be the first and main use, followed by TOF-MS and then HTMS. Here's a link to the original BN article  and here's the first time the BN shutter was used in a MS:  "Laser Tandem Mass Spectrometry in a Time of Flight Instrument" R. Weinkauf, K. Walter, C. Weickhardt, U. Boesl, E.W. Schlag, Z. Naturforsch., 44a, 1219 (1989). - according to . And here's a good introduction . That's almost enought to flesh the stub out. --Kkmurray 22:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stub has been slightly expanded to an acceptable size. Should we remove the merge suggestion??--Nick Y. 19:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Remove merge and substub flag. It's good now with the refs. and could be quite useful with a diagram and equations/specs. --Kkmurray 20:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bradbury-Nielsen shutter]] merge proposed 

message: I'm not sure if the present state of this article is good. If the main goal of this article is to present the Mass-to-charge ratio use of the term, then the generic name Time of flight should not be used. ToF is also used in ranging / distance measuring, and this article is to narrow. I suggest to move the present article, and create a generic ToF article which should describe the generic term (the time an object or signal use from A to B) and then link to other articles and special cases such as the mass-to-charge ration use. Other articles that uses the ToF principle is Time of arrival and Time difference of arrival.
Haakoo 03:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There should be a time-of-flight mass spectrometry article and a more general time-of-flight article that includes TOF-MS among other techniques. --Kkmurray 02:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This has been obvious for a long time.--Nick Y. 16:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Both articles still need work, but this should make it easier. --Kkmurray 03:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To narrow 
Talk:Glenn Murcutt

message: Three paragraphs were taken directly from here, so I have deleted them. Please do not restore them, but instead, write -- from scratch -- replacement text. --Calton | Talk 06:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violations

message: Does the Architect have a business website or internet presence? If so a link would be helpful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.9.166.130 (talk) 15:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: business website

message: Glenn Murcutt's built project Victoria's Moonlight Heads has been edited out. This was not completed to Glenn's liking, but as an ambitious project and part of Glenn's body of work it should be added. Here is a link to discussion of it.112.213.152.217 (talk) 09:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Moonlight Heads
Talk:Former Chicago Historical Society Building

message: I've put down the fact that the space was developed into the "Limelight" nightclub by Peter Gatien per this page on Vision's website: http://s126613707.onlinehome.us/vision/clubinfo/index.htm However, I'm not sure that they are correct because I don't think the building was ever used as a church. Crypticfirefly 06:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limelight 

message: The Excalibur (nightclub) article is a basically a history of 632 N. Dearborn St. from 1989 on, including at least 3 different nightclub names.  Not sure that Excalibur has separate notability from the building's own article. Closeapple (talk) 04:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The nightclub article seems to be sufficiently sourced to fulfill notability, but I don't think there's any harm in merging. BMK (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: User:GenQuest appeared to have started the merge, but didn't follow through, so I completed it. BMK (talk) 21:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Excalibur (nightclub)]]
Talk:Samuel Cooper (painter)

message: From the article: "This artist was undoubtedly the greatest painter of portrait miniatures who ever lived." — NPOV, anyone? --68.68.234.19 06:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mazda K engine

message: Blank (see edit history) 88.108.141.197 08:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Did Porsche really have something to do with the K engine? The only place on the web where I can find this mentioned is here (and on the MX-3 page). I'll tag it as in need of citation for now.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 14:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porsche
Talk:De Divinatione

message: This leaves out the considerable body of scholars (especially Mary Beard) who think that Marcus does not, in fact, equal M. Tullius Cicero in any substantive way. I'd refer you to the article in question, but my citation is in my other desk.
::Happened to be looking at this issue recently.  The appropriate references are:
Cicero and Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse 
Mary Beard, Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 76, 1986 (1986) , pp. 33-46
Cicero for and against Divination,  Malcolm Schofield, 
Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 76, 1986 (1986) , pp. 47-65
Zeusnoos 19:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag isn't appropriate for what you're suggesting; it's not the "factual accuracy" of the article that's in question, it's the interpretation of it.  I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you (or Mary Beard, for that matter), I'm just saying that the tag is misleading.  By all means include another section; I'm no expert on Roman philosophy, I just happened to be reading this a couple of years ago in Latin.  --CaesarGJ 08:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is supposedly a quote from this text, "No man was ever great without a touch of divine afflatus." -Cicero" This is supposedly from this work De Divinatione (see Afflatus). However, the translation of this: Negat enim sine furore Democritus quemquam poetam magnum esse posse, quod idem dicit Plato gives Democritus says that no one can be a great poet without being in a state of frenzy, and Plato says the same thing. I think the true quote is from De Natura Deorum
Nemo igitur vir magnus sine aliquo adflatu divino umquam fuit which translates, No great man, then, has ever been without some divine inspiration.Tstrobaugh (talk) 21:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote
Talk:Levi Clark Bootes

message: I filled out the biography somewhat with additional information, as well as added cats. I linked this to the Gettysburg Union order of battle article, although there are no other articles that reference Bootes. Scott Mingus 20:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added more text

message: * See: The War of the Rebellion, Volume XXVII, Page #1079 and Page #639  
Some of the Reports are made more than once using different wording each time.  Levi Clark Bootes made only one report.  It is on page #639.  Velocicaptor 02:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He made only one report in the Gettysburg Campaign; yet , he made a report earlier in September, 1862,  that was related to Antietam.  Velocicaptor 16:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact Cornell University
Talk:Punch line

message: while being quite irrelevant discussing The Aristocrats explicitly in this article, what is being said here is also dubious. the aristocrats' punchline did in fact inflict loughter to many first listening to it (which is also documented in that movie) and in anyway, it's not such an important reference to deserve inclusion in this article. there are million other examples that could be used as examples of the use of punchline or not.
    Agreed, it's irrelevant and should be removed. 204.187.34.100 01:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Aristocrats 

message: Is the designation "punch line" really only for jokes? Not a native speaker, I tried to get confirmation of the existence of this expression - but then I found here it is only for jokes while I believed it is a more general expression for a an articulated closing line, also of other texts such as advertisements and even formal report conclusions. My (Dutch-Eglish) dictionary actually gives a wider meaning to the expression.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.207.20.42 (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only for jokes? 

message: I landed on this article looking for consensus on whether it's "punch line" or "punchline."  Turns out the title of the article is "punch line" but throughout the article it's "punchline."  Which is preferred?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.177.138 (talk) 23:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "punch line" or "punchline"? 

message: The article lacks a definition, which it should start with. It jumps straight to etymology. Timelezz (talk) 17:56, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punch line is... 

message: perhaps the editor got it wrong. The footnote needs to either be corrected or the statement about 1915 : popular song needs to be removed. thanksSmithriedel 23:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology footnote about punch line in popular song (2) does not verify the statement.  

message: I updated this article in Nov 2015, in conjunction with a rewrite of the article on Jokes. The alert flags at top no longer apply; article now meets standards. I have added citations to content. Also removed anything that could not be verified.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithriedel (talk • contribs) 18:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  article rewritten, alert flags at top should be removed.
Talk:Collision resistance

message: It should also be mentioned that hard problems in the context of Cryptography are distinct from NP-complete hard problems in Analysis.  The latter is only difficult in the worst case, while the former needs to be hard in the average or best case.  I don't think either problem has been shown to be NP-Complete, and this would be surprising if it was true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.24.104.150 (talk) 14:57, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most arguments for the desirability of collision resistance in this article are actually arguments for pre-image attack resistance. Just because a collision can be manufactured doesn't mean a pre-image attack is feasible. Right? ~~Jae  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.248.163 (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While a pre-image attack can be more severe than a collision attack, all examples given on the page require collision resistance in some cases: (1) If a digital signature does not use a collision resistant hash function then an attacker would find two messages, one which the signer is willing to sign, ask for the signature of this message and claim it is a signature for the second message. (2) The first step in a proof-of-work system typically is to hash the message for which the sender wants to generate a proof of work. If this hash allows collisions then an attacker can cut his cost for the proof by first generating multiple messages with the same hash. Not sure if there are other places where these schemes rely on collision resistance. (3) If a file system is based on a hash that is not pre-image resistant then an attacker can replace a existing files with new ones. If the hash is pre-image resistant but not collision resistant then this attack does indeed not work and the attack becomes more difficult. However, the attacker can still try to generate two files with the same hash, one which passes reviews and can be checked in, and another one with malicious content, which can then be replaced for the first one. Hence file systems that depend on hashes for integrity checking require collision resistance. 2A02:1205:C6BB:6880:C929:B6B8:1D82:A1F7 (talk) 11:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collision resistance vs pre-image attack resistance
Talk:Ghaziabad district

message: I propose to merge Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh into Ghaziabad. I think that the content in the Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh article can easily be explained in the context of Ghaziabad, and the Ghaziabad article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Aaryangupta23 (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Moradabad district

message: Moradabad is also famous for handicrraft Bussiness. In main city area  like Lakri Fazalpur is the industrial area of the city. From here the item ready goes to many countries like Usa Dubai England. CL Gupta is a famous Bussiness Person of Moradabad. He holds many institutes like college. Factries Hospitals. CL Gupta factory is located in Chadaurpur on NH9. It gives the thousand person Employment Vksrkh (talk) 15:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Particularity
Talk:Inama Nushif

message: To clarify, "Inama Nushif" was not used in the trailer for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. The trailer features a melody which recurs in several other tracks on the Frank Herbert's Children of Dune miniseries soundtrack, including "Dune Messiah," "Children of Dune" and "End Titles." — TAnthonyTalk 02:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Indiana Jones''

message: Aren't talk page discussions kept on a page for archival purposes? It's not referred to as a "theme song" since I removed it shortly after posting that, ages ago, but wouldn't it be worth keeping here should the misconception arise again?Rasd (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 18:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup? 

message: :The lyrics and score were both written by Brian Tyler.... Brian Tyler pieced the lyrics together from excerpts of Fremen that appear throughout the Dune series of novels. The name of the song translates as "She is Eternal."
This is simply NOT true. The core of the lyrics is taken from The Dune Encyclopedia article on "The Fremen Language" by Alan S. Kaye and John Quijada, with some other material (apparently gibberish) added by Tyler, no doubt to fit the music. The original poem is in a modified form of Arabic ("Fremen"). Many of the words do notCORRECTION: NONE of the words (except bakka and Alia) appear anywhere in Frank Herbert's Dune books, so how could Tyler have found them there? And the title means "Though we deem" (next line: "the captive dead"), not "She is Eternal".
I'm not going to alter the article text because that would constitute OR. Apparently no one has noticed or commented on this, but I'm still looking for a citation. --SandChigger (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected details of comment --SandChigger (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outright plagiarism by Tyler? 
Talk:Muzaffarnagar district

message: 340.000 ??. I believe that is 7 times more.--88.19.49.50 (talk) 23:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: iblogger.org is on the blacklist so images from it should not be used.  See also the whitelist discussion|
Graeme374 (talk) 07:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images from greatestbattles.iblogger.org 
Talk:Saharanpur district

message: The article speaks of Saharanpur 'town', would it not be more appropriate to call it a city? Energyworm (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or city? 

message: I see the tag "" on the main page, even though it doesn't show up in the source. It is where the infobox should be. Anyone else see this? How can I fix it?
Farfromunique (talk) 19:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "{{{official_name}}}" 

message: The "Royal Family" section contains language that is not neutral. I haven't read the rest of the article; it may also have issues throughout. Henrygg98 (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality issue 

message: Saharanpur, known as the "Wood Carving City," is a cultural and artistic hub in India celebrated for its exceptional hand-carved wooden artifacts. Situated in the heart of the country, Saharanpur boasts a rich heritage of wood craftsmanship that has garnered global recognition. Skilled artisans in the city employ centuries-old techniques to create intricately designed furniture and decor items. The wood carving industry in Saharanpur stands as a symbol of the town's cultural legacy and unwavering commitment to craftsmanship. Visitors can explore the vibrant streets to witness artisans at work and experience the timeless elegance of Saharanpur's wood carving tradition. 103.170.147.45 (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wood Carving Hub of India
Talk:Sungnyung

message: Is this this really tisane? It does not contain any kind of herb and the way is cooked is completely different from any kind of tea. In Korea, it is typically categorized as just a hot drink, not a tea.Stevefis 00:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See the question below for the root of this confusion. Badagnani 00:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About Sungnyung being a tisane

message: :Very good additions regarding the correct method of preparation. It sounds as though it's somewhat related to the preparation of nurungji, the former being a liquid by-product and the latter being a solid by-product of rice cooking. Question: I have seen, in the Korean grocery store, toasted rice available for sale in clear plastic bags (similar to oksusu cha or bori cha). I also prepare this at home by toasting 1 tbsp. of rice, then boiling it. It's similar to genmaicha but without the green tea. Is this also called sungnyung or should it instead be called "rice tea" (bap cha?)? Badagnani 00:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct method of preparation

message: :Does sungnyung always have a few grains of rice in the bottom of the cup/bowl? If so, perhaps we should change the photo to something showing this, such as this one. Badagnani 00:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Are you saying that nurungji is cooked into sungnyung? If so, that should be made clear at the Nurungji article. I was under the impression that when you cook the nurungji, the finished dish is also called nurungji. Badagnani 17:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Nurungji]]
Talk:I Predict 1990/Archive 1

message: I tried finding a book by the name I Predict 1986 but couldn't. There's I Predict Nineteen Eighty-Five: Who Will Survive in '85?, and another published in 1986 entitled Twenty Years of I Predict, but nothing with the specific title added by the anonymous editor. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a listing for it - I Predict 1986 : A Year of World Destiny. Apparently this dude was a prolific writer (this was after nearly 20 pages of results under his name), here's some more of the series: 1984, 1985 1991, 2000, 20 years. Interesting, but still needs a RS. Dan, the CowMan (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lester Sumrall
Talk:Baghlan

message: According to AIMS/United Nations, Pashtuns make up 50% , Tajiks make up 40% and Uzbeks make up 10% of the total population.     (Ketabtoon (talk) 22:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the edits by Realist2010 as they are POV. And the source added is for the Province, not the city. The sources used by the user in all his edits do not back any of the claims. (Ketabtoon (talk) 05:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics of Baghlan District
Talk:Konohamaru

message: Why was this linked to the Land of Fire article?
That's where the Konohamaru info was, when I added this redirect link. Kain 15:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't understand why people would try to redirect this large article to List of Konoha ninja —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Candyo32 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because most of this article has been in List of Konoha ninja  for a few years now. Adding three sections that could easily be condensed to a sentence each doesn't make this article long. ~SnapperTo 22:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Charles Townshend

message: This page's format has got to change. It looks more like a big block of lots and lots of letters rather than an article. Suleyman Habeeb 07:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article needs some information about how he died, but not too much information.  Tcrow777  talk 22:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Townshend's death