lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sexually transmitted infection

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dirty pussy. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 08:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dirty pussy" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: has been on what I can only describe as a crusade against all mentions of the phrase "sexually transmitted disease", in favor of "sexually transmitted infection". I'm interested in seeing if such moves are necessary; I would think that both are essentially synonyms and it does not matter as long as there is consistency within each article. Anonymous 03:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: and  I'm pinging both of you due to your connection to this article and the discussion subject. Anonymous 02:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've not been involved with the article for some years. Unsure what to say about STD vs. STI consistency matter. I just know that "infection" is part of the current title. George Ho (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I assumed you might have some input as you were responsible for the most recent RM (granted, quite some time ago). If not, it may be worth bringing to RfC. Anonymous 04:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

text: See also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#STI vs STD. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  STI vs STD
Talk:TransCanada pipeline

message: Can it truly be called a Trans Canada Pipeline if in fact it does not encompass all of the Canadian provinces? The Trans entry in Wikipedia determines its use in geographic terms to convey the meaning "beyond" or "across" something. I have placed this question here along with the same question on the discussion page of History of the petroleum industry in Canada, part one for continuity. --HJKeats 15:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless, its name has "TransCanada" in it. Zhorken 17:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trans Canada Pipeline 

message: A vote in the House of Commons to limit debate, as in the Pipe Line debate, is cloture (pronounced cloz ure) rather than "closure" as it appears in the text of this article.
(142.179.202.66 (talk) 22:26, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliamentary Procedure 

message: The current map in the article doesn't appear to be very accurate.  It makes it look like the main line looks like it goes well south of the Canadian border, for instance slicing right between the upper and lower portions of Red Lake in Minnesota.  In reality, the pipeline stays north of the border, though there is at least one branch that comes off near Winnipeg (recently caught fire).  —Mulad (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate map 
Talk:SensorML

message: It would be great if the opening paragraph better described the types of sensors SensorML deals with.  It implies sensors with particular geographical locations, but doesn't really say so.
Since there are so many, many types of sensors it would be useful to be clear here.  For example, I'm looking for industrial sensors and an XML standard and happened upon this article.  It took a bit of reading to figure out that this standard does not apply.
This Wiki mainly contains an exact copy of the introduction to SensorML from http://vast.uah.edu/joomla/index.php
--Bogaerbr 13:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gyo Fujikawa

message: "Charles"?Rkaufman13 15:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the info I got from the biography index, but now that you mention it, it does sound odd.  I'll take it out. --Knulclunk 16:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Air Flamenco

message: I have removed this from the article as it appears to be commentary and not really encyclopedic: It is not clear when the name was changed to Air Flamenco, but the airline website states that Air Flamenco was founded in 1998. It is unclear if the first Flamenco closed down and was restarted or if it changed its name.  Maybe someone can clear that.  (The last update in the website is 11 Jul 05). MilborneOne (talk) 21:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Fu-style baguazhang

message: I'm not sure if this is quite right.  The  Tao Te Ching states that The Tao gives birth to One.
One gives birth to Two.
Two gives birth to Three.
Three gives birth to all things.  (or 10,000 things to be more traditional)
The I-Ching does predate the Tao Te Ching, but I haven't found any references to how the it is depicted here.
(Thehatinthecat (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-Ching creation theory 

message: Created this stub as a place to move Fu Style information which did not belong on the main baguazhang article.
Maintainerzero 15:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Creation 
Talk:Chrysler Royal

message: if anybody bothered to look at the link I posted you would see a commercial for a 1971 CHRYSLER ROYAL on YouTube.  The narrative is WRONG.  Why was this deleted?  Does anybody even bother to check things anymore or do they just automatically delete everything someone posts?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9cfllcxsN8  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.242.218 (talk) 21:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody look at edits and links before they delete them?
Talk:Rio Bonito, Brazil

message: "Don't wikilink any other words in the line, unless they may be essential to help the reader determine where they might find the information." (from Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Individual entries).  However, if an entry in the disambiguation page is redink (awaiting being written), then a link is appropriate to where the item is mentioned/discussed in the Wikipedia. --Bejnar 15:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikilinking on disambiguation pages
Talk:Rio Bonito

message: "Don't wikilink any other words in the line, unless they may be essential to help the reader determine where they might find the information." (from Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Individual entries).  However, if an entry in the disambiguation page is redink (awaiting being written), then a link is appropriate to where the item is mentioned/discussed in the Wikipedia. --Bejnar 15:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikilinking on disambiguation pages

message: # Rio Bonito, Parana
# Rio Bonito, São Paulo, 
# Rio Bonito, Santa Catarina
:These three are listed in the USGS database, and can be found at fallingrain.com.  
*On 27 July 2007 User: added 
*Rio Bonito, Espírito Santo, with the request that it be verified, and a note "Santa Maria de Jetibá municipality"  There is a river called the Rio Bonito flowing through Santa Maria de Jetibá municipality, and there is a dam on the river there that provides electricity.  There does not seem to be a village with that name; however, there is a street in Santa Maria de Jetibá named Rio Bonito. See, for example, Santa Maria de Jetibá official website --Bejnar 23:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red ink in Brazil
Talk:Luis Muñoz Rivera (senator)

message: I have posted an initial bio and sources on this notable Puerto Rican who shared the same name of Resident Commissioner Luis Muñoz Rivera.Pr4ever 16:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eugene School District

message: 01/28/2010 — additional factual information added by expert school district staff Kdelf (talk) 08:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 
Talk:Christine Tremarco

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Maggie Evans

message: The version of the article that existed before the article was changed to a redirect did not have any citations.  A recent effort at recreating the article add the following external links:
#Dark Shadows website
#Dark Shadows Online
#Collinwood.net
Though these are an improvement, they do not address the two main faults in the old version of the article.  (1) There are no citations to reliable sources for any of the statements in the article. (2) The article needs citations that demonstrate that the character Maggie Evans was sufficiently notable to merit a stand-alone article rather than a mention in the List of Dark Shadows characters article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources
Talk:Victoria Winters

message: Those of us who are old enough to remember the original series are also old enough to remember the rise of ending women's names with an "i" instead of the more traditional "y" (Cindi/Cindy ; Mandi/Mandy) in the late 1970s.  If you look at the popularity of the names Vicky and Vicki in items scanned by Google Books which were written between 1940 (Victoria was born in 1946 or 1947) and 1970 (when her character was written out of the show) you can clearly see that "Vicky" was the prefered spelling of the time rather than "Vicki".  http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Vicky%2CVicki&year_start=1940&year_end=1970&corpus=0&smoothing=5
NightBear (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vicky or Vicki
Talk:Angelique Bouchard Collins

message: Shouldn't this page be called something like "Angelique Bouchard" or "Angelique Bouchard Collins" or at least "Angelique (Dark Shadows)"?  "Angelique the Witch" is just, I dunno - but it doesn't seem quite right. CassieBlue 20:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "origin" seems to be false and a vandalism of questionable taste.  I have a very hard time believing 1970 TV (albeit an innovative segment of same) to actually feature such an origin. Luis Dantas (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Origin" - vandalism? 

message: Twice in a week now I have reverted the same "sexually explicit" edit referenced above. This page needs to be locked from future edits, save those from a legit moderator. People running Wikipedia, please take note of this.
Blozier2006 (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I also have reverted the same material, I have requested page protection from IPs at WP:RFP. --Jmundo (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock page request 

message: same vandalism is occurring AGAIN. HELP!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blozier2006 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock again 

message: How does one properly cite an episode of a television show?  I have been an editor on the CollinWiki and can get episode numbers from there to provide the citations this article is said to be lacking -- but I suspect this is why there are few independent sources listed. NightBear (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There are now DS Episode Guide type books out there, I suggest using those. This tv show will never be documented as well as other subjects, so use what is available. 98.67.0.31 (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of citations 
Talk:History of the Azores

message: Was Columbus really captured at the Azores island of Santa Maria, or just some of his crew?  About half of the articles I've found online make this claim, including this Wikipedia article, and the other half claim that only some of his crew were taken prisoner. I've found only one article which cites a source, which goes into a little more detail, which says that only some of the crew was captured:
http://www.lajes.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123326510
The article at that link says: "According to Silvio A. Bedini's Christopher Columbus Encyclopedia, a small group of Columbus men were attending mass when they were taken prisoners by a group of local villagers under the orders of the island's captain, João de Castanheira. It is also believed that there were some attempts to capture Columbus, but Columbus successfully evaded the presumable captors, sailing around the islands of Santa Maria and São Miguel for five days, awaiting the release of his men."
Without more and better sources for either scenario, I don't feel the Wiki article should make a definitive claim either way, so I've edited it to reflect that there's a difference of opinion.  JohnSawyer (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Columbus really captured on return from his first voyage to the Americas? 

message: An IP left a personal opinion in the article,  which is worthwhile to copy here.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the article 

message: It seems there is now even more solid evidence of establishment in 700-850 CE beyond simply mouse DNA. Studies of sediments have shown presence of human and livestock fecal sterol biomarkers.  Yesat (talk) 10:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early evidences via biomarkers in sediments
Talk:Push the Talking Trash Can

message: There are many YouTube videos that could support the 3rd paragraph (the control by the operator) where you can see the operator in plain sight.  Would this qualify as a valid source?
As for Pipa, I havn't seen any videos where "she" says her name.  Many YouTube videos refer to her as "Push".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlam (talk • contribs) 15:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:A-flat major

message: 30-May-2007: In 2006/2007, Wikipedia images required both attributes "thumb|250px" to show a caption, as in:
::: 
By itself, size "250px" ignores the caption "My picture" (confusing many people), which is considered bad form in computer languages (should warn & be corrected rather than ignore).  Just remember to include "thumb" (or "frame") for a caption in an image-link.
Image hints in 2007:
* Limit most images to "thumb|300px" to avoid crowded text-wrapping.
* A small image followed directly by a big image often chops text.
* To resize larger than the original ("oversizing"), omit "thumb" (oversized images cannot have captions in 2007, yet).
* Beware "left|thumb" (for "right|"), because left-side images appear immediately to left of the text.
* Most images (99.99%) should be quick JPEG for rapid display.
* Avoid resizing PNG images (2007): might become 10x larger resized.
Overall, omitting "thumb" is the most common problem.
There are many formatting issues in the Wiki software (used worldwide), with a long list of problems to fix, but in the software world, errors often persist, only to be upstaged by a totally radical new software version, rather than just fixing the irritating problems fast.  Note that numerous software systems (not just Wiki) have frustrating issues for years. -Wikid77 16:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image links

message: "When set to modern A440 tuning, the key is said to have a peaceful and stately or serene feel."
According to whom?  Also, in modern A440 tuning, i.e. equal temperament, the difference between keys is not what it used to be.  I think statements like this should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.140.77 (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  subjective/unverifiable
Talk:G-flat major

message: 30-May-2007: In 2006/2007, Wikipedia images required both attributes "thumb|250px" to show a caption, as in:
::: 
By itself, size "250px" ignores the caption "My picture" (confusing many people), which is considered bad form in computer languages (should warn & be corrected rather than ignore).  Just remember to include "thumb" (or "frame") for a caption in an image-link.
Image hints in 2007:
* Limit most images to "thumb|300px" to avoid crowded text-wrapping.
* A small image followed directly by a big image often chops text.
* To resize larger than the original ("oversizing"), omit "thumb" (oversized images cannot have captions in 2007, yet).
* Beware "left|thumb" (for "right|"), because left-side images appear immediately to left of the text.
* Most images (99.99%) should be quick JPEG for rapid display.
* Avoid resizing PNG images (2007): might become 10x larger resized.
Overall, omitting "thumb" is the most common problem.
There are many formatting issues in the Wiki software (used worldwide), with a long list of problems to fix, but in the software world, errors often persist, only to be upstaged by a totally radical new software version, rather than just fixing the irritating problems fast.  Note that numerous software systems (not just Wiki) have frustrating issues for years. -Wikid77 16:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image links

message: Including "Good Vibrations" in this list is rather dubious.  It is true that the refrain begins in this key, although, because of the minor 7ths in it, it would more accurately be called G-flat Mixolydian.  Using sequences, this refrain then repeats the phrase in A-flat Mixolydian, then B-flat Mixolydian.  The verses are in E-flat minor, so this key has a stronger claim for this song than does G-flat major.  After the second verse and refrain, the music modulates to keys such as B-flat major and F major.  It ends with reminiscences of the refrain mainly in A-flat Mixolydian.  So there is really no one key that this song uses as a whole.
It's a well-known song, of course; but its credentials to be in this list are probably rather slim.  I'd put it in E-flat minor, if any key.  That is, if it isn't D-sharp minor.  Quite possibly the song was performed in D minor or E minor anyway and then shifted up or down a semitone by means of recording techniques.  I wonder what key the published sheet music is in. M.J.E. 11:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Good Vibrations" is dubious.
Talk:B-flat minor

message: 30-May-2007: In 2006/2007, Wikipedia images required both attributes "thumb|250px" to show a caption, as in:
::: 
By itself, size "250px" ignores the caption "My picture" (confusing many people), which is considered bad form in computer languages (should warn & be corrected rather than ignore).  Just remember to include "thumb" (or "frame") for a caption in an image-link.
Image hints in 2007:
* Limit most images to "thumb|300px" to avoid crowded text-wrapping.
* A small image followed directly by a big image often chops text.
* To resize larger than the original ("oversizing"), omit "thumb" (oversized images cannot have captions in 2007, yet).
* Beware "left|thumb" (for "right|"), because left-side images appear immediately to left of the text.
* Most images (99.99%) should be quick JPEG for rapid display.
* Avoid resizing PNG images (2007): might become 10x larger resized.
Overall, omitting "thumb" is the most common problem.
There are many formatting issues in the Wiki software (used worldwide), with a long list of problems to fix, but in the software world, errors often persist, only to be upstaged by a totally radical new software version, rather than just fixing the irritating problems fast.  Note that numerous software systems (not just Wiki) have frustrating issues for years. -Wikid77 16:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image links

message: I plan on deleting any unsourced entries from this in a few weeks. (Listening to a piece and trying to figure out the key is not a source, and is also WP:OR.) Torc2 (talk) 08:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This can be difficult because many times when you buy sheet music, they've transposed it to an key that is easier to play on the piano. Any recommendations on source ideas? Kingturtle (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's going to be more difficult than that.  Per Wiki rules, even buying accurate sheet music and interpreting a key based on that is WP:OR.  Somebody's going to have to find a reliable source that has done the harmonic analysis and published what the key is in.  I think your best bet is to move all the "Music in this key" lists into one article and hope it survives an AfD.  What key the song is in is better left to the individual song articles anyway. Torc2 (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Well-known music in this key
Talk:D flat minor

message: 30-May-2007: In 2006/2007, Wikipedia images required both attributes "thumb|250px" to show a caption, as in:
::: 
By itself, size "250px" ignores the caption "My picture" (confusing many people), which is considered bad form in computer languages (should warn & be corrected rather than ignore).  Just remember to include "thumb" (or "frame") for a caption in an image-link.
Image hints in 2007:
* Limit most images to "thumb|300px" to avoid crowded text-wrapping.
* A small image followed directly by a big image often chops text.
* To resize larger than the original ("oversizing"), omit "thumb" (oversized images cannot have captions in 2007, yet).
* Beware "left|thumb" (for "right|"), because left-side images appear immediately to left of the text.
* Most images (99.99%) should be quick JPEG for rapid display.
* Avoid resizing PNG images (2007): might become 10x larger resized.
Overall, omitting "thumb" is the most common problem.
There are many formatting issues in the Wiki software (used worldwide), with a long list of problems to fix, but in the software world, errors often persist, only to be upstaged by a totally radical new software version, rather than just fixing the irritating problems fast.  Note that numerous software systems (not just Wiki) have frustrating issues for years. -Wikid77 16:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image links
Talk:G flat minor

message: 30-May-2007: In 2006/2007, Wikipedia images required both attributes "thumb|250px" to show a caption, as in:
::: 
By itself, size "250px" ignores the caption "My picture" (confusing many people), which is considered bad form in computer languages (should warn & be corrected rather than ignore).  Just remember to include "thumb" (or "frame") for a caption in an image-link.
Image hints in 2007:
* Limit most images to "thumb|300px" to avoid crowded text-wrapping.
* A small image followed directly by a big image often chops text.
* To resize larger than the original ("oversizing"), omit "thumb" (oversized images cannot have captions in 2007, yet).
* Beware "left|thumb" (for "right|"), because left-side images appear immediately to left of the text.
* Most images (99.99%) should be quick JPEG for rapid display.
* Avoid resizing PNG images (2007): might become 10x larger resized.
Overall, omitting "thumb" is the most common problem.
There are many formatting issues in the Wiki software (used worldwide), with a long list of problems to fix, but in the software world, errors often persist, only to be upstaged by a totally radical new software version, rather than just fixing the irritating problems fast.  Note that numerous software systems (not just Wiki) have frustrating issues for years. -Wikid77 16:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image links
Talk:Xie Peiqi

message: Created page, marked as Martial Arts Biography stub.  All that remains for the Yin Style Baguazhang lineage to be complete is a Men Baozhen article now.
I know there is more biographical information out there on Xie, but I don't have access to any of those books/articles at the moment.  If someone else does, that would be great, else I will try to get ahold of them myself.
Maintainerzero 16:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Creation

message: Page was marked for speedy deletion, updated with (another) 3rd party reference done as a tribute after his death...not sure how much more notable you'd like a martial arts personality to be. Maintainerzero (talk) 18:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated / New Refs
Talk:Tarakany!

message: '"Tarakany!" has been influenced by the Ramones, Bad Religion, Pennywise, TSOL and others, but don't try and pigeonhole them. They may be a punk band, but you'll also hear influences from ska, metal, and other genres floating through their songs.'
This reads like a fan page, not an encyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.178.19 (talk) 12:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled