lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seaview, Isle of Wight

message: I have Wikified, and removed some local "gossip" I could find no references too, and also a few small sections which didn't represent a neutral point of view.  
Maybe someone could find a picture, it sounds like a beautiful place!
--Ladybirdintheuk 12:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I think this is ridiculous. The article that is supposed to be merge does not exist.--Filll 12:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected this small mistake. Père Lachaise 14:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We have many tourist sites like Blackgang chine that have separate articles here. If the former "Flamingo Park" can be fleshed out better, there is no reason to not have a separate article. We have many stubs for places on Isle of Wight. And hopefully they will grow with more information.--Filll 18:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've contributed to the article am not sure it can be fleshed out much more. Blackgang chine is geomorphological so of slightly more importance and of long-term significance.  —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 09:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of these Isle of Wight articles are stubs, or start out as stubs. I know that the Flamingo Park article can be substantially expanded. Lumping all these small articles together I do not think will improve readability or accessibility, or encourage others to add material. I am against the merger therefore.--Filll 12:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Caylus (game)

message: Do people think that winning the Spiel des Jahres Sonderpreis (special prize) means that this article should be added to :Category:Spiel des Jahres winners? Percy Snoodle 12:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be the first year there's been a special prize, so we might want to include it. --Che Fox 05:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually the 25th Sonderpreis awarded - I'll add them to the SdJ article today :-) Percy Snoodle 08:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I've added a note on scope to the category so it includes Sonderpreis winners and included Caylus in it. Percy Snoodle 10:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonderpreis 

message: Should it be included that placing workers increases cost as the other players pass? And additionally that the first player to pass gains a denier? It seems small enough, but the strategy from its design is enough to quibble about. Ngajoe 11:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rules Errata
Talk:Time (2006 film)

message: Has this film premiered? Just look at this: http://www.iffkv.cz/?lang=en. Gsh 12:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I'm not sure now. http://www.kaijushakedown.com/2006/05/kim_kiduk_going.html states that it premiered at the Cannes market, but perhaps that never happened. Multiple other sources also state that it will open at Karlovy, so I'll go ahead and change the article and update the sources. Foolip 16:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The ref tag doesn't seem to be working? /Grillo (talk) 22:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref
Talk:Rotary tiller

message: The edit below was unsigned:
"ERI shows that the "Rototiller" name is a registed trademark for their FM broadcast antenna systems:
http://www.eriinc.com/about/history/index.htm
http://www.eriinc.com/products/rbs/CA21830A_01.pdf
Be it of note that the "ROTOTILLER" antenna line resembles the blades of a rotary tiller."
:Bear in mind that the same trademark can be obtained by different applicants for other classes of product or service. Gregorydavid 14:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademarks

message: I just interwiki-redirected "Rotary harrow" to "Rotary hoe" from the Shakers page.  The Shaker's page said that their communities were semiotically architectured upon the compass rose, sacred architecture, and that they created the propellor and the rotary harrow amongst other things.  I am not informed in this matter.  I will leave the redirect stand:  though it would be very appreciated if somebody a "mover & a shaker" with knowledge in this matter could please complete what I have left undone?  
Thanking you in anticipation.
Blessings in blood
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 02:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaker's "Rotary Harrow" 

message: There is an advertisement for the company Mantis on the page under section Origin. Can somebody please remove it, I don't know how to do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raindog80 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement in the article 

message: While trying to find this article, amusingly, I found the front page of google littered with anti-rototilling articles (e.g.  and .
I don't know enough on the subject to say whether this is crackpot or not, but there is a page, No-till_farming, currently contentious, that could be referenced. What do folks think? Odoketa (talk) 06:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate on tilling using rototillers
Talk:Subdeacon

message: He wore a maniple, until this was abolished by Pope John XXIII ... 
Where is the evidence that it was John XXIII who abolished the maniple? I thought that this was done under Paul VI with the instruction Tres annos abhinc from May 4, 1967. I'll change the article accordingly unless evidence is posted to the contrary.
I thought the reading of the Epistle at Mass/Divine Liturgy was historically the duty of a subdeacon in both the Roman and Byzantine liturgical traditions, although, obviously, this is now almost invariably done by a lay person acting as a reader in both these traditions.      —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.239.152.174 (talk) 03:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The maniple isn't abolished. Even Pope Paul VI abolished the subdeaconate (somewhat) but not the maniple specifically, and even in the New Rite, they may still be worn by priests.--2001:A61:20A3:EA01:BD21:ECFC:CE90:27F3 (talk) 11:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sukanya Krishnan

message: Although her profile at the SAJA site claims that she was married, from the evidence of her on-air banter with fellow presenters John Muller, Linda Church, Julie Chang and Emily Frances, I surmise that, even if she was at one time married, she is currently single. If anyone can prove or disprove this hypothesis, I would be happy to hear their argument. -- Jalabi99 12:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Suki Mama -- WPIX-TV -- It's A Boy! says "my husband Eric". However, her Facebook info page is surprisingly sparse, even for "friends".   — Jeff G.  ツ 02:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, not only is she now married to Eric (a New York City fireman), she also gave birth to their son. -- Jalabi99 (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Marital Status
Talk:Vejovis

message: Sweet! this god is cool we had to do it for a project and it made it fun.--209.50.143.179 12:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool god 

message: This description is very bad, far away from the Italians studies, and the writes we can find about him in Latin or in French.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.147.165.184 (talk) 13:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve description 

message: Page updated regard to the big survey I made in French about this deity, with some English sources (most of my sources are in French, Italian or in Latin).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vediovis365 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page updated 

message: Why is this article entirely in the present tense? Is there a current cult of Vediovis? 87.115.206.206 (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tense
Talk:Warcraft: War of the Ancients Trilogy

message: I removed "For some strange, sick reason, Blizzard has decided to include a lot of this tripe as canon. Investigations are currently being run as to what the hell people in charge of that decision were smoking at the time." 04:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavily POV Statement Removed
Talk:Warcraft: The Sunwell Trilogy

message: Why are these "manhwa" and not "comic books"? Kappa 00:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell they're illustrated by a Korean which would make them manhwa and they're authored by an English speaking person which would also make them OEM. Correct me if I'm wrong --Squilibob 10:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The story paragraph should not be considered story becacuse that is what happens in the first book i know i wrote that part. Sand geni 11:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: how does dwarf shot elf?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.53.199.75 (talk) 00:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Question 

message: I take issue with this comic series.  It deviates from the original story line quite a bit.
In the RTS game Warcraft 3, Arthas, as a Death Knight before he became the Lich King, lead the Scourge into Quel'thalas specifically to use the energies of the Sunwell to resurrect the Lich, Kel'thazad.
There was no subversion or traitor involved.  The scourge assaulted the elves head on, killed Sylvannas Windrunner, and tore down the gates of Silvermoon on their trek to the Sunwell.  
Once there, Kel'thazad was reborn as a Lich and the pure energies of the Sunwell were corrupted beyond use.  Thus why the blood elves came to be.  With most of their people killed by the scourge and their magic source ruined beyond repair, they had to adapt.
Dar'Khan did betray his own, but he was not guided by Arthas as this comic says.  Arthas didn't have that kind of power at that point.  The Lich King did, but he and Arthas didn't become one until much later.
The long and short of it is, its a decent story about dragons in Azeroth.  And the art is pretty good.  But the guy who wrote it needs to learn his Warcraft history if he's going to be writing anything else.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuraierick (talk • contribs) 08:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: This series of comics is part of a major gaming universe, but comprehensible on its own; has been published in multiple languages, including English; has been reviewed by recognized comics sources.  Article is still a stub but I don't think there's a notability issue here.  Feel free to discuss! :) --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 03:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed notability tag
Talk:Warcraft: Lord of the Clans

message: It apparently created the character Draka, now a main character in the movie: Source: https://twitter.com/ChristieGolden/status/724021585993191424  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.49.22.12 (talk) 09:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

message: This is an idea based on replying to the unreferenced tag that has been on this article since 2010.
Reading this article, the information largely comes from the novel itself, as well as the cancelled game's article which make them the only citations (self-serving/referential as a result), which makes this article really more of an extension of the game's article. Given this, and that this article is kinda short, would it be rational to merge them/make this a sub section of the game's article? Not all the Warcraft universe novels have their own articles, so this one would not be an odd-one-out. Tytrox (talk) 05:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Merger discussion has been raised. See Talk:Warcraft_Adventures:_Lord_of_the_Clans#Merger_proposal Tytrox (talk) 04:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with the cancelled game article?
Talk:Gap junction

message: How can the innexin family be hypothetical?  Does it mean that the innexins themselves are established, and there's a hypothesis that they form a family?  A reword would be helpful. --Reuben 21:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypothetical innexin family? 

message: In the text it currently states as follows
"At gap junctions, the intercellular space narrows from 25nm to 3nm..."
Doesn't make sense, should it be 2.5 to 3 nm? Tobias Larsson (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling? 

message: I may be wrong, but I believe there are much more extensive gap junctions in neurons than the article expresses. Rods and Cones (in Cone-cone (except not blue cones), rod-cone, and rod-rod coupling), horizontal cells, amacrine cells and retinal ganglion (Circuit Functions of Gap Junctions in the Mammalian Retina, S C Massey, 2008). According to Purves (Neurosciences, 3rd ed), brain stem neurons, cerebral cortex, thalamus, cerebellum, and other brain regions have gap junctions. According to Fukuda et. al. in Gap junctions among dendrites of cortical GABAergic neurons establish a dense and widespread intercolumnar network. in J. of Neuroscience 2006 Mar 29;26(13):3434-43, cortical chandelier and basket cells, having on average, 60 gap junctions. These are just what I could come up with in a few minutes... I think it makes this statement: 'Few locations have been discovered where there is significant coupling between neurons in the brain.' sound very misleading.
Pete (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gap Junctions in the Brain 

message: "...mostly small intracellular signaling molecules..." - I removed this statement, since it isn't always true. In neurons, it is mostly ions that diffuse through gap junctions. Also, I rewrote the beginning to be more concise and technically accurate. Fuzzform (talk) 01:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  etc. 

message: Electrical synapses are gap junctions, so please, MERGE those two articles! (Gap junction and Electrical synapse THANKS!(Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE 

message: Pete, you are right.
Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  p.s. 

message: hi!
I can't really handle citations in wikipedia, so I report it here: the link to the article "Hexagonal array of subunits..." (reference 9) leads to a completely different one. Here, you find the correct article: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&cmd=search&term=Hexagonal+array+of+subunits+in+intercellular+junctions+of+the+mouse+heart+and+liver
Could someone please correct this? Thanks. --Milebrega (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link
Talk:Nawabs of Bhopal

message: I propose that Begum of Bhopal be merged into Nawab of Bhopal. There were only 4 reigning Begums of Bhopal, one being titular only. There's no point splitting the List of Muslim Sovereigns of Bhopal into two lists on the basis of gender. Ratibgreat (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there has been no opposition in the past month, I've been bold enough to merge the articles. utcursch | talk 13:56, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lovely! Ratibgreat (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The current pretender of the title should be Saif Ali Khan; the former pretender being Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi. Do we expand the list to include pretenders? Or should we indicate that the Nawabi of Bhopal has been fused with the Nawabi of Pataudi like England and Scotland, because of the marriage of the two incumbents? Ratibgreat (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretender 
Talk:Bernard L. Diamond

message: Diamond did not provide “medical” evaluations of persons accused, he provided psychiatric evaluations. Medicine deals with physical diseases, and there is no suggestion that a bodily illness was responsible for Chapman killing Lennon or Sirhan killing Kennedy. If the defense thinks that a brain disease might have impacted behavior, it will employ a neurologist. Nicmart (talk) 02:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnomer
Talk:UK driving licence codes

message: Are you sure of the minimum age. My Licence licences me to drive cats f,k,p from 22/02/06. Whereas for A and B, Im valid to drive them from 06/03/06 (my 17th). Just bringing it to your attention. Thanks DannyM 17:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catergory f 

message: The dvla website does not included minibuses under cat B only D1.  Minibuses cannot be driven with a standard issue driving licence issued recently. Perhapos it needs changed. --77.97.229.86 10:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: minibuses
Talk:Woods Hole, Massachusetts

message: Moved the following to this talk page -- the Z Communications staff is not cited, nor is their notability as a staff substantiated.  Also, it is my belief that a notable residents list in a principal U.S. scientific and recreational community ought to have more than one member before it is added to the WP page of a location.  Consider the many, many notable scientists, Nobel laureates, and people of historical/New England interest who have resided in the village. FEastman (talk) 19:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable residents list
Talk:Language/action perspective

message: This is a first stab at content. A better approach might be to define the LAP, to describe applications, and finally to discuss implications thereof (such as the influence on the AI Winter, relationship to John Searle's work, etc.). jmswtlk 12:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The text "Yet, these LAP successes have not found entry into the wider stream of applications." is not IMO correct. That 'entry', and considerable penetration, is Action Workflow. 
[Note 'ActionWorkflow' (no spaces) is claimed as a TM in the abstract section of this seminal 1992 paper  and is/was a named product of the company sponsoring that paper. 'Action Workflow' (with a space) refers more broadly to the concepts embodying or derived from the LAP view of workflow.]
Here's just one modern (2000) example 
which begins "The goal of this paper is a reassessment of the Action Workflow approach, a
well-known application of the Language Action Perspective (LAP)" [quoted under the fair use doctrine].
I came here because Action Workflow has no Wikipedia page. Really surprised there is no mention of Action Workflow here. Ideally it would have its own page, and be linked from here, but we have to start somewhere.
I find many Google hits for 'Action Workflow' both within Wikipedia and externally, but the work seems fragmented and related to specific toolsets with no emerging web based centre of excellence.  Seems ideal for a wiki entry.  Unfortunately I've done nothing in this area since 1994, so I will help, but I don't yet feel able to lead.   
Duncan (noob editor)
::As it says above, this was a first attempt to support the AI winter page. 
::By all means, add 'Action Workflow' to the content. Winograd references ActionWorkflow on his page without a TM. 
::The quote about 'mainstream' comes from the LAP 2004 conference. I had the wrong year. I've read two papers with essentially this theme. This ought to be a separate section, after a better introductory section. 
::Also, given all the recent attention we see with the Semantic web, perhaps something about that ought to be added here. jmswtlk 02:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Action Workflow (may be TM)? 
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Blessings

message: If you're looking about a better name, how about "endorsement"?  --Doradus 13:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A better name is definitely needed. Blessings has religious overtones for many people. Approved or endorsed, is better than "blessed". Carcharoth 11:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better name than "blessings" 

message: It seems to me that the cases examined are not sufficient to give a solid idea, as they are only non-contentious subjects. The first paragraph seems to indicate that anyone can give these blessing, contrary to the rest of the article. But restricting them to experts wouldn't make sense. For example, the only blessings on Time Cube would be by Gene Ray. --Philosophus T 12:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we can have a central panel that verifies users' credentials. (for example, verifying that a particular user is indeed who he says he is and does indeed have a law PhD from Harvard) Readers could then review the credentials of a review panel and on that basis choose whether or not to trust their blessings. The proposed idea of users "choosing a set of blessings" allows for the possibility of competing review panels who could endorse different versions of the article. You could have an amateur review panel that endorses more frequently, and therefore provides more up-to-date endorsed versions, and a competing expert review panel that would endorse less often but would provide a better guarantee that the article is definitive.--Yannick 15:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What defines "experts in each field"?
Talk:The Honeycombs (album)

message: , there has been a notability tag on this article for 7 years. I am redirecting until it is established that this meets WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG. Of course, if you disagree, please revert. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag
Talk:The Amtrak Wars

message: Addition - May 18th, 2006
The "rumours" mentioned above weren't unsubstantiated.  I used to participate in the Authors forums on his website before they were taken down and I was an active participant in the thread in which the author himself revealed the "work in progress" on Book 7, which was, indeed, to be titled, "Ghost Rider".  The "Ghost Rider" of the title was the central figure of the Amtrak Wars books, Steve Brickman, who, contrary to appearances at the end of book 6, was not actually killed and had, in fact, been taken back by the First Family and "reprogrammed".
After this snippet was posted, it was the cause of much excitement and many follow-up questions over a period of a year or so  about, "when will the book be published?"  The author himself would continually say that he was working on it, but it never appeared to lead anywhere. I eventually emailed the publishers a direct question and, much to my amazement, received a reply from Patrick Tilley himself in which, sadly, he confirmed that the book just wasn't going to happen and, I quote, "the war is over..."
The delay and long absence from writing, according to the author himself, was caused mostly by the conflict in the Balkans and the authors horror at the sorts of ethnic cleansing and infighting going on that had all too many parallels to the works of fiction he was engaged in writing. (posted on main article by ) Ben W Bell talk 13:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Is it "Mr Snow" (British/Commonwealth style) or "Mr. Snow" (American style)?  It certainly should be all one or all the other within the article.  2600:1004:B169:E2AD:CDB9:57E3:1ADD:C3A (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's about the UK, then use British English, but I've always used Mr. and Mrs. rather than without the full stop as a brit - I don't really think it matters too much Ed6767 (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a series written by a UK author but set in a future, post-apocalyptic America, which makes it less clear-cut.  If it were an American writing about America, "Mr."  If Brit writing about the UK, "Mr".  But since it is not that, I think that the answer is how it is done in the books.  Does anyone remember how it appears in the actual books themselves?  72.106.150.64 (talk) 01:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which is it really? 

message: The term "superstraight" is used in a couple of the character descriptions but is nowhere else used or explained.
I am currently reading the first book (pre-revision series) and the term has not appeared.
So, what is "superstraight"? 2600:8800:204:C400:29CD:DC50:3875:9507 (talk) 03:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Superstraight" ? ? ?
Talk:Jubilee 2000

message: So, was any debt actually cancelled? -- Beland (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results 