Talk:Czechoslovakia

message: The bias at the page is visible via particular usage of terms. I suggest using neutral ones because Wikipedia is an independent encyclopedia and such bias damages neutrality. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 07:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bias"? that’s all you have to say to justify your reverts? GizzyCatBella🍁 08:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  User talk:GizzyCatBella my edits contain neutral terms, while yours contain strawman. You do the same thing at every article about the particular political view. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 08:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Yuto is right, GizzyCatBella is pushing hysterical non-neutral language. GizzyCatBella is also denying the role of the Slovak state in the Holocaust of the Jews by removing "and their allies" from the Holocaust sentence. The Slovak state deported the Jews to their death, not the Nazis, The Holocaust in Slovakia.--Iron Thain (talk) 09:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry the page will be restored status quo ante, arguments needed first for a wise discussion.(KIENGIR (talk) 16:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you show the same neutrality for articles related to socialism? The way of language used in particular articles regarding socialist Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia is so biased. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please point by point explain your concerns.(KIENGIR (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :ŘČS and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 13#ŘČS until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ŘČS" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I would like to ask why is here presented as official coat of arms of Czechoslovakia the coat of arms of Czechoslovak socialist republic. I do not deny that socialist coat of arms was used between 1960 and 1990. But this period was not the most defining period of Czechoslovakia. In fact, socialist regime hijacked the Czechoslovak state. The founding idea of Czechoslovakia was not soviet communism. The founding idea of Czechoslovakia came from Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, which was quite opposite of soviet communism. If Czechoslovakia was founded as state based on soviet communism, it would make sense, if there is presented the socialist coat of arms. But the soviet communism rather hijacked Czechoslovak state and replaced its original coat of arms by the socialist one. It would make sense, if you replaced the communist coat of arms either by coat of arms of Czechoslovakia right before its dissolution or by coat of arms of Czechoslovakia based on idea of Masaryk, i. e. the coat of arms that was official between 1920 and 1960.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:830A:B20D:D300:F9C7:6C6F:3532:60DA (talk) 12:33, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Czech - and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Czech - until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Czech -" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Their are two dates used for the dissoloution of the state, being December 31, 1992 and January 1, 1993 and they are used interchangeably. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradicts itself