lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sky City 1000

message: does tokyo really only have one fire helicopter?!
What are you talking about? -- Jason Palpatine 05:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: One fire helicopter

message: Taipei 101? Its not so unrealistic anymore
:::Sky City would be 2-3 times the size of Taipei 101, increasing its occupancy (population) and all the associated problems and difficulties exponentially. LordAmeth 20:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not so unrealistic

message: Not only is this a "Vision" according to Emporis (meaning it won't be built), but it was proposed in 1989. --Old Guard 00:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vision

message: The Radiant City page currently covers an independent film, not Le Corbusier's book La Ville Radieuse (which is what this article seems to be referring to).  Can someone who actually knows more about architecture than I do create a disambiguation page for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkaaito (talk • contribs) 11:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I de-linked Radiant City, and typed a hidden message alerting editors not to wikilink it. Creating a disambiguation page for Radiant City is not an issue for this article, and I assume that's what the 'expert' tag is up for, so since Radiant City no longer links to the film, I'll remove the tag. --Pwnage8 (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiant City link incorrect 

message: I have made big improvements to the article. --Pwnage8 (talk) 08:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: this is going to be shorter than nakheel tower. >_> HELLO! --Sneaky Oviraptor18talk edits tribute 22:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  news flash 

message: true in the 1990's bubble...not so now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.124.135 (talk) 13:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...Land prices in Japan are the highest in the world..." ??? 

message: Horsefeathers! Kingdom Tower will be taller than Sky City 1000.
Anonymous71.164.209.8 (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horsefeathers
Talk:Chevalley–Warning theorem

message: There is something wrong in this article. Chevalley's theorem holds for systems of polynomials too. Warning's theorem states that the number of zeros is divisible by p. David Brink (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chevalley–Warning 

message: q is not defined in the proof, I take it to be the field cardinality but it should be said. It should also probably be mentioned that i must be a positive integer.
The sum of powers of field elements is zero is a vacuous proposition for q=2. So how do we conclude the annihilation of polynomials of low degree in this case?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B146:96C5:14FA:FAFA:E01:1FA4 (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof clarification
Talk:Militia (United States)

message: I am not someone with a much experience on Wikipedia articles so I wanted to bring this source and the areas that I think it could be used to expand on before I started doing anything to the actual article. Please give this a read and see what you think of the information relating to the Early Republic Period, chiefly Jefferson and the Madison administrations, and the militia during the Mexican-American War.
On a broader note, the development of the volunteer militia companies during the post War of 1812 could be expanded to some extent with this article too.  —71.219.84.229 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the source calls itself a "libertarian publication".  Any source identifying itself with fixed political viewpoint is going to be immediately suspected of not passing WP:NPOV, so isn't going to be helpful here in general.  The article itself has sources; perhaps they can be used, if some specific points of interest can be itemized.  --A D Monroe III(talk)  23:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for expanding Early Republic Period and added Mexican-American War section 

message: Since the first paragraph of the lead is what pops up in the browser when one hovers over the term as referenced in another Wikipedia page, we should be careful that this provides meaningful information to the reader.  Currently, this appears to the reader as follows: 
Since this is not particularly helpful, I propose to change it to something like the following: 
This will result in the following display when the user hovers over the term, providing a better experience for the user: 
Any discussion?  If there is no objection or discussion within a reasonable time I will assume that either nobody reads these talk pages or that there is no objection, and I will proceed to make the change.  --John (Johnnie Bob (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No discussion heard, so fixed this by removing paragraph break between first and second paragraphs of lead. --John (Johnnie Bob (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

text: During colonial America, all able-bodied men of a certain age range were members of the militia, depending on each colony's rule.
It might more correctly say "… all able-bodied white men …," though I expect a new reference would have to be added. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph of lead needs to be more informational
Talk:Anno Lucis

message: As can be discovered by reviewing the linked page on the Julian calendar, it is incorrect that the Gregorian added 10 days to the Julian.  The Gregorian subtracted 0.0075 days (on average) from the Julian.  It is true that the Julian and Gregorian are about 10 days shorter than the Roman "ordinary" year, but I'm not sure that really has any place in this description. --JamesGibbsMcLean (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julian versus Roman Calendar 

message: This page should not be merged with Freemasonry because it would be extremely hard to find the information found herein, were the merge to take place. Someone seeing "AD 1965 AL 5965" on a building would wonder what AL is and naturally search for it, I don't think anyone would search for Freemasonry by just seeing "AL". --ni ez naiz aldatuko 01:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Freemasonry]] 

message: It is not clear from this explanation why the Masons should add 4000 to AD dates to get AL dates. Following the explanation we should expect them to add 4004.
:As stated, it is a simplification of the Anno Mundi date (which adds 4004) ... The Freemasons simply rounded off the extra 4 years.  We don't know why they did this (there are no records explaining why)... we only know that they did so. Blueboar 18:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although they didn't always round off. In Nairn in Scotland the masonic hall bears two dates over the door: 1913 AD and 5917 AL. So there they were clearly using 4004, not 4000. Paulatthehug (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 + 4004 = ? 

message: I removed a  REDIRECT to Anno Mundi#Other computations  since  that article no longer refers to Anno Lucis. I borrowed the contents from the 40th century BC page. In consideration of Dontbeakakke's remarks, above, I put in category links to Latin Words and Phrases and Freemasonry. Lists of abbreviations etc. seem to also link to Anno Lucis already. Some of the remarks made in 2007 suggest that this formerly was an article, and not just a REDIRECT. Perhaps reverting to a prior version would have been better, but there you have it. Tom Lougheed (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Created stub
Talk:RAC Limited

message: The RAC (Royal Automobile Club) is a private club and separated from the RAC plc, the motorists organization. Thatcher131 01:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have moved details of the early history up until the formation of RAC Motoring Services Ltd to the Royal Automobile Club article because it seems more relevant to that organision which was the legal owner at the time. It also neatly allows us to separate the early formative motoring era from more recent events. I suggest that we treat this organisaion as having been formed in 1978 and add any history relating the period prior to that to RAC club article and all details of all subsequent events to this article. PeterEastern (talk) 11:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of history section 
Talk:Virginia v. Black

message: I believe the proscribable category of the "true threat" existed prior to this case, and the language of the opinion of the court seems to bear me out on that. As I understand it, the crux of this case was not true threats, per se, but rather about the jury instructions indicating that the burning of a cross was prima facie evidence of "intent to intimidate" (which would constitute a true threat).
The ruling was that these jury instructions took the burden off the prosecution to prove "intent to intimidate", and that they were therefore unconstitutional. Juansmith 01:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't read the case for awhile, but I'm pretty sure you're correct.  Feel free to make the proper corrections to the article.  Postdlf 02:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will eventually; I just figured I'd mention it in case someone else didn't want to wait. I discovered this because I used Wikipedia to help me study for a constitutional law exam (making case flash cards and so forth), and the incorrect info about true threats caused me to get severely marked down on one of the short essay questions. Now that I (kinda) know the facts, I figure I should fix it, lest others suffer the same fate.Juansmith 07:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: True threat

message: At § Majority the discussion focuses on the Fourteenth Amendment, yet that term is only mentioned once in the case opinions (other than the title of the act that became ):
The First Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, provides that "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech." I also see that it references itself in the last sentence of the second-to-last paragraph. Is the section an accurate representation of the decision? If so, should "U.S. Const. amend. XIV" be added to the infobox LawsApplied param and :Category:United States Fourteenth Amendment case law added? Also, move from :Category:United States Free Speech Clause case law to the more specific sub-category :Category:Overbreadth case law? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 08:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourteenth amendment
Talk:Nikolayevsk

message: The more common spelling seems to be "Nikolaevsk". Kaldari 01:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian transliteration in Wikipedia is outlined at WP:RUS.  Common English usage is only applicable to well-known names/places (such as [Moscow]], Mikhail Gorbachev, etc.).  You may also want to take a look at Cyrillic transliteration policy unification project at WP:CYR.  Hope this helps.  And, oh, I'll restore the accent mark—those are used for all Russian terms and add encyclopedic value.  Let me know if you have questions.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 01:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Lake Iamonia

message: I removed this from the article: 'Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 31200' because it doesn't seem to be something that the average user would understand. If I am incorrect, please undo my edit.Darkcraft 13:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add it back. It is not known who an average user is (no statistics) and those familiar with such codes would find it as a plus. Deleting scientific information because it may not be understood surely wouldn't go over well on articles dealing with chemicals, toxins, scientific equipment, etc. Noles1984 14:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrologic Unit Code? 
Talk:Worker's Marseillaise

message: The only recording of Отречёмся от старого мира (which, interestingly enough, is pronounced "otrechyomcya ot starovo mira") I can find has slightly different lyrics. I got the copy from http://www.hymn.ru/index-en.html and the same song with the same lyrics is around. By combining this article, http://www.medianetjapan.com/10/travel/vladimir/russian_house/la_marseillaise.html, and my own listening, I've come up with these lyrics:
Отречёмся от старого мира,
Отряхнём его прах с наших ног.
Нам не нужно златого кумира,
Ненавистен нам царский чертог!
Царю нужны для войска солдаты,
Подавайте ему сыновей,
Царю нужны дворцы и палаты,
Подавай ему крови своей! 
Припев:
Вставай, подымайся, рабочий народ! 
Вставай на врагов, люд голодный! 
Раздайся клич мести народной! 
Вперёд, вперёд, вперёд, вперёд, вперёд!
Кулаги, богачи жадной сворой
Расхищают тяжёлый твой труд,
Твоим потом жиреют обжоры;
Твой последний кусок они рвут.
Не довольно ли вечного горя?
Встанем, братья, повсюду зараз
От Днепра и до Белого моря
И Поволжье и дальний Кавказ!
Припев
И взойдёт за кровавой зарёю
Солнце правды и братской любви,
Хоть купили мы страшной ценою
Кровью нашею счастье земли.
И настанет година свободы
За эпохой кровавой борьбы,
И сольются въедино народы
В царстве славы, труда и борьбы!
Припев	
Otrechyomcya ot starovo mira,
Otdryakhnyom evo prakh nashikh nog.
Nam ne nuzhno zlatovo kumira,
Ninavisten nam tsarskii chertog
Tsaryu nuzhniy dlya voiska soldatiy,
Podavaite emu siynovyei,
Tsaryu nuzhniy dvortsiy i palatiy,
Podavai yemu krovi svoyei!
Chorus:
Vstavai, podiymaisya, rabochnii narod!
Vstavai na vragov, lyud golodniy!
Razdaisya klich mecti narodnoy
Vperyod, vperyod, vperyod, vperyod, vperyod!
Kulagi, bogachi zhadnoi svoroi
Raskhishchayut tyazhyoliy tvoi trud,
Tvoim potom zhiryeyut obzhoriy;
Tvoi poslednii kusok oni rvut.
Ni dovol'no li vechnovo gorya?
Vstanyem, bratya, povsyudu zaraz
Ot Dnyepra i do Belovo morya
I Povolzh'e i dal'nii Kavkaz!
Chorus
I vzoidyot za krovavoi zaryoyu
Solnitsye pravdiy i bratskoi lyubi,
Khot kupili miy strashnoi tsyenoyu
Krov'yu nashyeyu shast'e zemli.
I nacnayet godinaya svobodiy
Za epokhoi krovavoi bor'biy,
I sol'yutcya vedino narodiy
B tsarstvye slaviy, truda i bor'biy!
Chorus
What do you think?
SQFreak 01:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Demolition Man (character)

message: There is some question about Demolition Man's Avengers membership status and it is begin talk about at the Talk:List of Avengers members page. Spshu (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Avenger Member Status

message: Is there any reason/explanation as to why he uses an almost exact replica of Wolverine's old costume? --134.192.191.243 (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costume
Talk:Symbology (disambiguation)

message: In the 21st century, emoticons and emojis seem to have replaced a study of the meaning of symbols.
These are symbols too, but because of the way and the purpose for which they were created (writing spam emails, evidently), it isn't surprising that there seems to be a revolt over what symbology means.  Emojis that move and emoticons that don't, exist nowhere but the internet.  They are a waste of portable memory even in that context, IMO, but then, so is social networking in general.
There is nothing wrong with this word.  It needed no "disambiguation" page in an English language encyclopedia.
None of the other choices of the word meanings on this "disambiguation" page has the same meaning.  If you can't do any better than that, my suggestion is to remove the page entirely and let someone else do it justice, because Wikipedia evidently doesn't understand the meaning of this word in any context.
Just tell readers to consult a good Merriam-Webster dictionary or something.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danshawen (talk • contribs) 20:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbology is the "study of symbols", which may be written, pictographs ASL, or even utterances 

message: The is no Wikipedia article per se on Symbology as a study of Symbols. Should there be one?  -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.98.105 (talk) 22:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The word "Symbologist" has a strong association with the Da Vinci Code novels. AnonMoos (talk) 08:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbology
Talk:Bradfordville, Florida

message: I had to remove dead link to County Road 0342 in favor of actual name in hopes a page can be created. Bradfordville doesn't qualify as a bedroom community since most of it is commercial. Most of the housing is outside of the Bradfordville area. Thanks for your contributions. (Noles1984) 207.156.48.127 16:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a page for Leon County, Florida Road 0342 now. :-) - Aerobird 21:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  County Road 0342 
Talk:Red Hills Region

message: Well you're supposed to put "an" instead of "a" when the next word starts with a vowel...as an encyclopedia, wouldn't that trump "popular usage"? - Aerobird 15:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're supposed to put "an" when the next word starts with a vowel sound. Unique starts with a consonantal Y sound. —Keenan Pepper 17:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: "The Red Hills extend from the Aucilla River on the east to the Ochlockonee River on the west"
This doesn't seem to square with the depiction on the map, on either side...? - Aerobird 13:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In at least one scholarly source, the "Red Hills physiographic region" is defined as the area in northern Florida and southern Georgia bounded by the Ochlockonee and Aucilla rivers and the Cody Scarp. Figure 1 on page 2 of the Cox, Baker, & Engstrom paper resembles the map you removed. A map in a blog also resembles that map. There are other areas in the U.S. that are called "Red Hills", and colloguial use in Florida may include a wider area in the "Red Hills region", but the first source cited above does define the "Red Hills physiographic region" fairly narrowly. (The blog is not usable as a source, but it does show that the narrower definition of "Red Hills region" is also in use in northern Florida.) - Donald Albury 21:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent
Talk:Viktor Tikhonov (born 1930)

message: The author of this page forgot to have a look at 'Links to this page' - otherwise, he would have noticed that a namesake, who also did well at the Olympics, was imprisoned in Russia for a murder attempt in 2000. An unfortunate link, that cannot be blamed on the person who put the then red link on the Aman Tuleyev page, as he did that in September 2005 already... --Pan Gerwazy 20:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no connection between this Victor Tikhonov and Aman Tuleyev's murderer! 

message: A note within this article states that the Russian entry for Tikhonov says he was a colonel in the Russian Army -- this article states he was a general. Which is correct? Skudrafan1 (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: *The ruwiki entry is in fact correct, and Tikhonov is described as a colonel by Russian sources, never as a general. Kges1901 (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  General or colonel?
Talk:Hotel Windsor, Melbourne

message: I dispute the POV stance of User:203.134.126.106 and User:Kfarln28 which appear to have an agenda in consistently removing citations and adding uncited and unsubstantiated facts regarding this building.  --Biatch (talk) 05:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed edits 

message: I have edited the last section regarding the various permits nad appeals and im pretty sure i got them all in, and in order. Added latest news that it was mostly likely all off.
Rohanstorey (talk) 07:30, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 proposed alterations time limit expired
Talk:Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood

message: Since adoption records are sealed,  and birth certificates issued in the names of the new parents,  there may be an issue with phrasing here.  I suspect you can't claim an open adoption,  or an adult adoption,  but if you have a birth certificate from a closed adoption,  it's hard to see how you'd be prevented from being issued a card.  KenThomas (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not by adoption? 
Talk:Mottled duck

message: Two points:
1. The name of "Florida Duck" (or, worse, "Florida Mallard") is a folk name. It is not a proper name. It's a holdover from when they were believed to be distinct from the Alabama-westwards population. So the entire species is, indeed, properly known as "Mottled Duck".
2. The discussion about threats to the Florida population of MODU obmits one of the more serious ones. It mentions possible hybridisation with lingering American Black Ducks - but has this ever been confirmed? I've never heard of it - but the real problem is genetic swamping by feral Mallards (aka "Mall-oids") which are illegally released and have become established throughout the state as permament, sedentary residents. This is perhaps the single most significant threat to the survival of the Florida MODUs as a genetically distinct population. (Remember, folks, "Easter Ducklings" are not cool!) - Aerobird 15:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Read it again and noticed that it does mention Malloidian swamping, but only in the context of continued habitat destruction and overhunting. Even if construction and hunting were stopped, the Florida Mottled Ducks are in serious danger of being swept under by the tidal wave of feral Mallards... - Aerobird 15:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida Mottled Duck 
Talk:Vinyl composition tile

message: Is the statement about asbestos glue not being dangerous accurate?  Can we find a source for it?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgirten (talk 
: No it was not. I have updated the article text to reflect more accurate data. Tile mastic, both black asphalt based and later latex-based tan mastic contained asbestos when vinyl asbestos floor tiles and sheet flooring were being sold. The hazard arises during demolition when the mastic can become pulverized and thus an airborne asbestos hazard unless proper wetting guidelines are followed. I included a citation to my research article on this topic. 22:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I propose that Vinyl floor tiles be merged into Vinyl composition tiles. I think that the content in the new article can easily be explained in the context of this one, and the new article is of a reasonable size that the merging it here will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.JamesG5 (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no recent activity, so I've just turned it into a redirect. The main source appeared to be spam, and the rest of the content was generalities about vinyl and such which would belong elsewhere anyway. The old page can be seen . Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal