Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Water sports

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: :Category:Canoeists by century, , has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon (talk) 06:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Canoeists by century

message: I am looking for information on Cliff Diving, but wikipedia only has a small section under Cliff_diving#Non-competitive_diving.  Looking on the web, and finding La Quebrada, Mexico mentions that cliff diving is there.  But I have no way to locate this page without the help of google.  I feel that Cliff Diving should have a specific page to itself.
:Other locations:
*Kimberley region, Western Australia, 28meter
*Southpoint Cliffs, Hawaii, 30-50 feet
*Negril’s cliff, Jamaica, 40-70 feet
*Brontallo, Switzerland, 26+ meter
*Ponte Brolla, Val Maggia, Southern Switzerland, 20meter
Thanks, 160.109.98.44 (talk) 18:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cliff Diving 

message: There is discussion ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:BIO#RFC:_WP:Athlete_Professional_Clause_Needs_Improvement debating possible changes to the WP:ATHLETE notability guideline.  As a result, some have suggested using WP:NSPORT as an eventual replacement for WP:ATHLETE.  Editing has begun at WP:NSPORT, please participate to help refine the notability guideline for the sports covered by this wikiproject. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Notability 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Water sports articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water sports articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have recently started or beefed up several articles, making use of the new info template:
Adventure_Sports_Center_International
U.S._National_Whitewater_Center
Lee_Valley_White_Water_Centre
HowardMorland (talk) 04:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Artificial Whitewater Courses

message: Zodiacs are used to illustrate the article Inflatable boat, but are not mentioned in the article, or in the article Rigid-hulled inflatable boat (which is mentioned on the RIB disambiguation page). The RHIB was developed at Atlantic College in Wales in the 1960s. 
*Is a Zodiac boat which can have a solid (eg plywood) transom and floor a Rigid Inflatable Boat (RIB) but not a Rigid-hulled Inflatable Boat (RHIB)? 
*Is Pierre Debroutelle's 1937 design (referred to in the Inflatable boat article, History) certified by the French Navy, with an added wooden transom (1943), the same as the inflatable rubber boat from the 1930s referred to in the article on Zodiac Aerospace? 
*The Inflatable boat article (History) also refers to the 1950s: the French Navy officer and biologist Alain Bombard was the first to combine the outboard engine, a rigid floor and a boat shaped inflatable. Zodiac built that boat and a friend of Bombard, the diver Jacques-Yves Cousteau began to use it, after Bombard sailed across the Atlantic Ocean with his inflatable in 1952. Cousteau was convinced by the shallow draught and good performance of this type of boat and used it as tenders on his expeditions.
*The Zodiac history should be added to the article on Zodiac Marine & Pool, who are the current manufacturers of Zodiacs (not Zodiac Aerospace). Hugo999 (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Zodiac (boat)]] 

message: Feel free to help fill in Template:Student athlete by adding new articles or creating articles for redlinks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  18:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New template [[Template:Student athlete]] 

message: I'm perfecting it by adding new articles and biographies (for use the "purge button"). Who wants to help this, of course, is free to do so. --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Portal:Sailing]]

message: Hi, I am a new editor and an editor, Future Perfect at Sunrise recommended that I go to you for assistance after the editor removed most of the content I put on Wikipedia for Jeff Rowley. By the way, I am not Jeff Rowley and want to edit his article. Future Perfect at Sunrise called this page a 'monstrosity' and I couldnt understand why because to me, I think the page looked good and there were ZERO complaints since this page has been up, for 8 months. I went to Wiki support for help and they also directed me to you as Future Perfect at Sunrise mentioned no experience of editing in this field. 
I actually put this page up three times after it was torn down because I thought that someone was vandalising the page and it was devastating. 
Can you help me edit this article to make it appropriate for Jeff Rowley page on Wikipedia? I am a new editor and dont want to be banned on Wikipedia. I also want the articles I contribute to, to look as visually attractive as possible. 
Thanks
Lengthy page content removed
Shacktown123 (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not appropriate to post the lengthy proposed content of an article here, so I have removed it.  Readers can look at the history of the article Jeff Rowley and see your version.  Other readers can express their views, but my own view is that FPaS was wholly justified in reverting your version as being over-promotional.  If you want to promote a subject than you are welcome to create a fansite, but that isn't the purpose of an encyclopaedia such as Wikipedia. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't disagree that the earlier version of Jeff Rowley was too promotional, but surely one can say more than three sentences about an award winning, professional surfer. I don't know the subject matter, so I don't know how to help the editor, but we have an editor, not skilled in the rules of Wikipedia, asking for help in expanding the article somewhat. Because of my lack of knowledge of the subject matter, I thought this project would be a good place to ask for help. Can someone offer to help Shacktown123 identify the types of things that are appropriate for a bio of someone in this field?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeff Rowley

message: See talk:Disability sailing classification for the discussion -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 06:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Disability sailing classification]] → [[Sailing classification]]

message: An RfC discussion about the MOS:FLAG restriction on the use of flag icons for sportspeople has been opened at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. We invite all interested participants to provide their opinion here. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on the use of flag icons for sportspeople

message: This is a courtesy message to inform the members of this project that I have nominated Portal:Sports for featured portal status. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Sports. The featured portal criteria are at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria. Please feel free to weigh in. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Sports is up for featured portal consideration 

message: :File:Red raft.jpg has been nominated for deleiton -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Red raft.jpg

message: Competent Crew has been proposed for deletion. [--File  Éireann 02:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Competent Crew

message: Hi, I am a member or WP:Kayaking, I am hoping to request a help from AnomieBOT to auto-tag articles with . I will ask for the bot to tag all pages in :Category:Canoeing and kayaking and all it's sub-categories.
I think that all of these pages also fall under the scope of WP:H20 so I would like to get it to add  to them too. It can also replace redirect templates such as  with . I will assume there is consensus for the task if there are no objections in a week. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated process for article tagging and/or assessing 

message: I'm from WikiProject Kayaking I have just started a discussion on our talk page about the naming convention for Canoeists vs Canoers. We would appreciate your input on the topic. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC: Convention of article names of Canoeists vs Canoers 

message: Hi everyone!. I recently uploaded a set of photos from the Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland of some sailboats. You can find them on Commons here. Hope they are of some use for you!  SarahStierch (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photos on Commons that might interest you 

message: Hello!  The above old abandoned AfC submission is about to be deleted as a stale draft.  Is this a notable player, and should the article be save?  —Anne Delong (talk) 23:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andy Stevens]] 

message: Dear water sports enthusiasts:  This old Afc submission will soon be deleted as a stale draft.  Is this a notable athlete, and should the article be kept and improved?  —Anne Delong (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dirk Klingenberg]] 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: I created :Category:Water sports articles needing expert attention for making :Category:Kayaking articles needing expert attention a subcategory of it. :Category:Water sports articles needing expert attention will maybe be populated in the future, and might be of interest to your WikiProject. Iceblock (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention 

message: Is Keanu Asing a notable surfer? Dwanyewest (talk) 10:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Keanu Asing notable? 

message: Should a Surfing in the United States article exist? I think it would be notable since we have articles on Surfing in India. Dwanyewest (talk) 10:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it exist? 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: I have nominated Sunday Times Golden Globe Race for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKiernan (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunday Times Golden Globe Race 

message: You should know about this and comment.  One of our editors has systematically depopulated it, and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion [[Category talk:Yachting races]]

message: Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.
If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ RobTalk 01:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto-assessment of article classes 

message: An RFC has recently been started regarding a potential change to the notability guidelines for sportspeople. Please join in the conversation. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on sports notability

message: Hello all. In an effort to finally resolve the never-ending and annoying GNG v SSG issue, I've proposed a revision of the NSPORTS introduction. You are all invited to take part in the discussion. Thank you. Jack | talk page 06:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at NSPORTS 

message: Hello, I've recently relisted a page-move debate at Talk:Water skiing#Requested move 22 February 2018. This project appears to hold this page high in importance, and it would help a great deal if you would come and add your opinion and expertise to that discussion. Thanks in advance!  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  18:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please come and help... 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    11:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hi; Since the last year, I started some articles of female surfers that were red links in those pages: 2017 World Surf League and 2018 World Surf League. I edit Wikipedia occasionally and I'm not an expert on the rules. But with about 10 years in the project, I know some basic things like notability of somebody to figure in Wikipedia. In my head, all CT (top level) surfers are notable as they are the best in the world in a popular (now Olympic) sport. In the last couple of weeks, I faced a deletion tag in Caroline Marks article. I tried to argue that somebody who is top ten in the World in a sport like surf is clearly notable. But I could not save the article. Now there are deletion tags in the articles of Johanne Defay (#1 in Europe and top 10 in the world), Courtney Conlogue (2 times runner up in the word), Silvana Lima (2 times runner up in the word), Bianca Buitendag (former CT member and top 20 in the world), Nikki van Dijk, Laura Enever, Coco Ho and Jacqueline Silva. All of those
surfers are (or were) top level competitors, all are mentioned in the ASP years pages and I can't understand why their are in a deletion process. I came here, in WikiProject Water sports to ask somebody to save those articles and, if it is possible, to recover Caroline Marks article. Thanks. Caiaffa (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's Surf 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Fishing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Fishing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 06:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Fishing]] for deletion 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: There is a content disagreement going on at Talk:Surf culture#Inclusion of image. Outside opinions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time. 61.10.67.14 (talk) 00:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute at [[Talk:Surf culture#Inclusion of image]] 

message: Hello,Please note that Skurfing (sport), which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: Draft on a possibly notable 73 year old surfer, for the interested. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft talk:Bob Purvey]] 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:In the news § Remove ITN/R: Sports cleanup.  Currently one or more of this sport's events are listed at Wikipedia:In the news/Recurring items, meaning that they have been judged significant enough that, if nominated, they will always be posted to the In the news section of the main page (subject to article quality being sufficient). However a proposal has been made to remove some that not been nominated recently from that list. If the proposal is successful, the event(s) may still be nominated but the nomination will debate the significance of the event as well as article quality.The event(s) relevant to this sport are: FINA World Aquatics Championships.To avoid splitting discussion, please leave your comments in at the linked discussion rather than here. Thryduulf (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal related to featuring this sport at Wikipedia:In the news