Template talk:Indian missiles

message: I'm changing the template from Template:Navbox to Template:Military navigation for two reasons- one, there are too few missiles in each group to warrant a full width infobox. The military navbox half width box looks much better. Secondly, it is a proper MILHIST Template, which means it will have a few advantages over the Navbox. It may not look as good, but the smaller look, in my opinion, balances it out. 
I'm attaching both versions below:
==== Old Version ====
==== New version ====
=== Other Changes ===
# I have also restored the A2A missile group, since it is an important group, and is quite distinct from SAMs.
# I have removed the missile types from the Agni missiles - a reader will get to know about the type when he gets to the page. Same for the Prithvi.
# JV has been indicated with a superscripted "‡" symbol, with a legend at the bottom
# Names for the 2nd and 3rd groups has been renamed from "Ballistic" and "Cruise" to "Ballistic missiles" and "Cruise missiles", since the name seems extremely abrupt and confusing for a reader.
Looking forward to your comments
Cheers,
Sniperz11@CS 23:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template change 

message: # I have also restored the A2A missile group, since it is an important group, and is quite distinct from SAMs.
# I have removed the missile types from the Agni missiles - a reader will get to know about the type when he gets to the page. Same for the Prithvi.
# JV has been indicated with a superscripted "‡" symbol, with a legend at the bottom
# Names for the 2nd and 3rd groups has been renamed from "Ballistic" and "Cruise" to "Ballistic missiles" and "Cruise missiles", since the name seems extremely abrupt and confusing for a reader.
Looking forward to your comments
Cheers,
Sniperz11@CS 23:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Changes 

message: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MISSILES/Armoury.html
Pl. make changes to the template new missiles have been developed and added some missiles are not even mentioned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enthusiast10 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: as per as reports, I think Shaurya is not a ballistic missilehttp://www.flonnet.com/stories/20090102252609400.htmwhere it had been describe as a missile with non-ballistic trajectory hence I had edited the ballistic missile group to surface to surface missile group but you have undone it, more over SAM Trishul project had been shut down and had been designated as technology demonstrator.
:Hi Payeng. Shaurya by all reports is a Quasiballistic missile, since it is capable of some manauvering (Till now, reports do not mention anything more than that, that can make us rethink). However, that still means that it comes under the Ballistic missile category. The Prithvi too, has some quasiballistic characteristics, as does the RSM-56 Bulava. Thus, that is one point we should note. The presence of maneuverability (and we are seeing increasingly maneuverable ballistic missiles today), does not make it different from a ballistic missile. As it is, quasiballistic missiles are too close to the ballistic missiles to call a separate class..... ballistic today refers more to the fact that they are not powered during their flight, and any maneuvering is achieved through other means, such as vanes, aerodynamic elements, etc, which do not supply power to thrust the missile. Cruise missiles, on teh other hand, are powered throughout their flight.
:The second point is about Trishul.... note that this template is for Indian Missiles, including failed ones as well, which have had test flights, or are ongoing programs... this is mainly done to provide easy access to information. Thus, I had included the Trishul also. this is also the reason I have included missiles like Maitri and Barak-2 which are still on the drawing board. 
:Hope that cleared some of the doubts we had. Thanks. Sniperz11@CS 11:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sniperz11, Thanks for clearing my doubts Sniperz11 but what about 'helina'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Payeng (talk • contribs) 15:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its the same case mate.... Helina is still an Anti-tank guided missile, and will come into that category, irrespective of the launch platform. This is similar to the hellfire also... Note that an Air to ground missiles are usually considered to be somewhat distinct from ATGMs. Hope that answered it. Cheers. Sniperz11@CS 09:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: wont it be better to arrange the missiles according to class? like SLBM - Prithvi I,II,III, Agni 1, Shaurya .. MRBM: Agni II, Agni IIIA, IRBM Agni III, ICBM Agni V (something like that)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.71.248 (talk) 12:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message to Sniperz11@CS 

message: I propose that in row: "Air-to-surface", we remove the following topics related to bombs: "Unguided/glide bomb", "Cluster bomb" and "Anti-runway", as these are simple drop bombs, having no ability to maneuver, and do not possess powered flight, hence are unsuited for the category "Missiles". Perhaps a new template can be created for them. Anir1uph (talk) 18:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombs?