Talk:List of areas disputed by Canada and the United States

message: I think that this article should be renamed "List of areas disputed by the United States and Canada".
When "dispute" is used as a noun, it is often paired with the preposition "over", e.g., "a dispute over territory" or "a dispute over ownership of a resource".
When "dispute" is used as a verb, on the other hand, the preposition is not used: "the lawyers for the defence disputed the judge's ruling", "The Phillipines disputes Malaysia's claim to Sabah", "ownership of the area is disputed by Canada and the United States".
Here is the entry on "dispute" from [http:\\www.m-w.com Merriam Webster]:
:Main Entry: 1dis·pute 
:Function: verb
:Inflected Form(s): dis·put·ed; dis·put·ing
:1 a : to make the subject of disputation b : to call into question <her honesty was never disputed>
:2 a : to struggle against : OPPOSE <disputed the advance of the invaders> b : to contend over <both sides disputed the bridgehead>
I'll wait for a few days for comments, and if there are none, I'll make the change. Thanks. Kevintoronto 14:45, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: shouldn't the title/list reflect historical territorial disputes; the Aroostook War, the Oregon boundary dispute (OK, OK, Britain vs the US, not Canada vs the US), the Alaska boundary dispute, the Northwest Angle, the San Juans, control of the Inside Passage and Northwest Passage and ???  Skookum1 06:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you attempt to make this update rather than just complaining on the talk page? --The_stuart 21:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: historical disputes

message: I did a heads-up when I saw this - Whuh?!  Looking at the CIA factbook ref on the Strait of Juan de Fuca page it's not specific.  I'd imagine it has to do with the route of the boundary, or how it diverges once it's off Cape Flattery/Port San Juan (Port Renfrew,  on Vancouver Island).  It could be that it's an issue of an equidistant boundary being preferred by one side or the other, and would have to do with potential drilling rights - fisheries are already shared in this zone, and navigation has been guaranteed since the Oregon Treaty of 1846.  What that treaty does state is the route of the boundary from the 49th Parallel shall follow the deepest channel to the sea (hence the San Juans dispute) so it may be that the channel through the Strait of Juan de Fuca doesn't conform to the usual equidistant thing in maritime boundaries; I know that the US uses the same argument, in fact, in defiance of the Alaska Boundary Treaty, which is why they don't recognize the A-B Line in the Dixon Entrance and have surveyed/auctioned drilling leases down to the mid-point/equidistance line of the Entrance (which is supposed to be wholly Canadian, like the Portland Canal, under the terms of the treaties...).Skookum1 22:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strait of Juan de Fuca disputed?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of areas disputed by Canada and the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081218165011/http://www.cwilson.com/pubs/energy/alaska.pdf to http://www.cwilson.com/pubs/energy/alaska.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified