lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Westall UFO

message: With the perspective of a first-time reader of the article, this line wasn't clear to me regarding a time reference, contemporary or later story: . I'd like to propose this addition: . 5Q5|✉ 13:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, Rjjiii (talk) 23:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  with explanation in the edit history. 5Q5|✉ 13:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edit - newspaper time frame
Talk:Mako

message: I removed the link to the Boston band called Mako. I'm from boston and have asked around and nobody I've asked has heard of the band and searching on google does not turn up links so I'm skeptical about the "influence" of the the band. The link in the article was to the band's Myspace page. If the band is notable, someone should create a stub article for the group with enough evidence to demonstrate notability and then link to that page and not to the Myspace page. —mako (talk•contribs) 20:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mako (band) 

message: My uncle gave me one of these, although I am unable to google anything on it.
On another note, target 4 turns up many google searches for archery releases, both look alike.
If I am holding it in my hand I say that's a source. Casemods 03:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, "you holding it in your hand" is not an acceptable source for Wikipedia.  Please see Reliable sources, Verifiability, and No original research.  Also, I'm not sure it would merit an article on its own in any event; see Notability and Notability of corporate products.  If you disagree, please be sure to address how the item meets the criteria given in those policies and guidelines.  Thank you.  —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 02:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mako (archery release)
Talk:War Industries Board

message: Can someone change the format? I don't think wikipedia endorses the "school report" format with an included bibliography
:Done.  If that material belongs in Wikipedia, it belongs in the individual articles.  If anyone wants to move it, it's still in the article history.  The very first sentence I checked was incorrect, so I didn't bother. - Crosbiesmith (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Format? 

message: It seems very biased, and leftist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.233.83.120 (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The remark itself appears to be biased; without a point of reference, examples. The section is not helpful nor constructive. Moreover, it is unsigned and old (2008). I nominate that this section be deleted. <B>RW</B>ymant@lk 17:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: The article fails to address the ending of the War Industries Board.
:I know most of that history. I'm actively looking for sources to cite. <B>RW</B>ymant@lk 17:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of information 

message: The text says "seven" original members of the board, but the bullet points list eight. Dgorsline (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dgorsline, good point, I did some research and found the 7 original members in American Industry in the War: A Report of the War Industries Board. New York: Prentice-Hall, p.22.Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original members?
Talk:Artery

message: The main picture here is quite poor. Perhaps someone invested in this page can find a clearer image with free-use. ask123 16:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Image 

message: It looks like the image 'Diagram of an Artery" has flipped the identity of the basement membrane and the internal elastic lamina. I don't know how to change it, assuming that I am correct. Ihfish (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Mistake(s)? 

message: It seems to me that the 2nd paragraph of the Structure section has a sentence misplaced, specifically 
"The elastic tissue allows the artery to bend and fit through places in the body." 
I suspect that sencence should be placed directly following the first sentence in the following current text:
" Inside this layer is the tunica media, or media, which is made up of smooth muscle cells, elastic tissue (also called connective tissue proper) and collagen fibres.[2] The innermost layer, which is in direct contact with the flow of blood, is the tunica intima, commonly called the intima. The elastic tissue allows the artery to bend and fit through places in the body. This layer is mainly made up of endothelial cells (and a supporting layer of elastin rich collagen in elastic arteries)."
My concern is that the last sentence in this section, "This layer is mainly made up.." should clearly(?) refer to the intima, not to the elastic tissure, which is what this last sentence currently follows directly after in the original wording?
Shouldn't this section read, "Inside this layer is the tunica media, or media, which is made up of smooth muscle cells, elastic tissue (also called connective tissue proper) and collagen fibres.[2] (This) elastic tissue allows the artery to bend and fit through places in the body. The innermost layer, which is in direct contact with the flow of blood, is the tunica intima, commonly called the intima. This layer is mainly made up of endothelial cells (and a supporting layer of elastin rich collagen in elastic arteries)."
(I placed the word "This" preceding "elastic tissue" in parentheses because the original text said "The", in order to show that I changed that word to make a better reference to the preceding sentence. Of course the parentheses should be removed.)
And perhaps the Structure section text should indicate the existence of both internal and external elastic lamina, to follow the diagram of the artery?  UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 00:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplacement of sentences? 

message: Artris kya carry karti hai 223.225.122.46 (talk) 14:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sst
Talk:Inara George

message: I separated out the reference to the peaches vid and clarified as people who were directed there were under the misunderstanding that George was the performer (it's Peaches). Throw this section out for all i care, it really doesn't add anything to the essential biography of the subject except it might be ammusing/enlightening to some fans to note that TBATB collaborated with Peaches. If anyone can fill in more collaboration information then maybe it justifies a section to itself --75.146.47.17 (talk) 02:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Actually, her musical partner in Merrick was Bryony Atkinson (not Bryon). She had an album out in 2011 titled 'Do I Hear a Bidder In the Back?'. An article in LA Weekly from 2001 (available on the web) starts with "By the way, we're not lesbians.". Huh, can't two girls make music together and just seem sweet and innocent? -- 2003:70:CE35:55D6:7452:AEB4:D0F3:DFED (talk) 15:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, corrected it myself. -- 2003:70:CE35:55D6:7452:AEB4:D0F3:DFED (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merrick
Talk:Potato crisps

message: Er.. Tayto (Irish firm) invented flavoured crisps at least 10 years before Golden Wonder or Smiths. - http://www.taytocrisps.ie/aboutus/about_history.asp Jooler 20:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flavoured crisps

message: I note from the table that caramlised onion and sweet balsamic vinegar as discontinued sensation brand since when can I ask? I have just eaten a pack of them this evening so im wondering where this was sourced from, cos I dont feel it is correct at this moment in time. --PrincessBrat 20:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of crisps - Walkers

message: While there are differences between potato crisps (uk) and potatoe chips (us), they both fall under the same category and for the sake of making it simple for people to find information they are looking for and organizing information the articles should be merged. The differences between the US and UK should be noted and Potato Crisps and Potato Chips should redirect to the same article. Walkers (best selling UK crisp brand) and Lays (US Chip brand) are both owned by PepsiCo and use the same logo, so the differences are debatable. I would assume they both use the same formulations, although somebody should verify this by looking at the ingredient list and nutritional facts on both packages and comparing to ensure they are of the same composition. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.94.195.137 (talk) 05:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  These articles really should be merged
Talk:Scepsis

message: I added a map. Alekjds talk 02:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: The link of current note 1 to Bayramiç is to the wrong Bayramiç, linking to a city northwest of the Sea of Marmara instead of the Bayramiç village and town (I think) north of Kaz Dağı (Mount Ida). I will fix it soon, but first I want to pin down the actual locations of ancient Skepsis and Palae-Skepsis which, based on an initial effort, may not be easy. This is information I need, so I will continue the effort but perhaps someone knows the actual latitude and longitude coordinates of these places, somewhere on or near the north slope of Ida. — Blanchette (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's pin down the locations of Skepsis and Palae-Skepsis 

message: Well, Palae-Skepsis is a challenge, but the location of the Archaic/Classical city is well known as a search of Turkish articles will attest. I have located a good map showing where early 20th-century scholars located Skepsis in Walter leaf's Strabo on the Troad and here is a map excerpt with the following description: 
:Portion of the fold-out map titled "The Troad: After Kiepert & Philippson with corrections by Walter Leaf" included in Leaf's translation and commentary titled "Strabo on the Troad", Cambridge, 1923. This excerpt is centered on the archaic and classical Greek city of Skepsis, its name rendered in red as are other ancient locations on the map. The orthogonal portions of the latitude and longitude scales from the edges of the complete map (i.e., 39° 30' - 40°N and 26° 30' - 27°E) are copied to the edges of this excerpt to identify the coordinates of Skepsis. Leaf (p. 270) credits (Walther?) Judeich with clarifying Strabo's confusion about the location of Skepsis when he found an inscription with a proxeny decree by the town of Skepsis in situ:
Using Google Earth and Bing Maps, I have verified that the photo accompanying this article [] was taken from a position close to that of a photo looking southeast from Skepsis appearing as Plate XVI-B in Leaf's volume. The landscape features from the 2009 photo are identifiable on the Bing and Google maps and the Google Earth and Leaf XVI-B mountain skylines match. I changed the coordinates previously given in this article to the correct ones. —Blanchette (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pinned Down 
Talk:Ulyanovskaya Mine disaster

message: The English used in this article is terrible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.173.2.6 (talk • contribs) 
Reply to above:
Oh okay. What have you been doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.140.165 (talk • contribs) 
:How's that?  I re-worded most of the article...  reads much cleaner now.  Of course, for future reference, you can edit articles yourself...  Bushytails 18:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The English is perfectly fine. I don't see how 62.173.2.6 could think otherwise. Nishkid64 20:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This was the version when 62.173... replied. The only real English problem I could see was the quote. Even that was perfectly understandable even if a bit strangely worded  Nil Einne 07:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who was the English manufacturer of the safety equipment?  I can't seem to find a name in any online reports.  Would that be a relevant detail for this article or not? DanBeale 11:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not totally useful, but if you cold find it, you can surely add it to the article. Nishkid64 20:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturer of Equipment?
Talk:Giselle (disambiguation)

message: I'm doing some cleanup work per Wikipedia:Disambiguation, which says "Lists of articles of which the disambiguated term forms only a part of the article title don't belong here. Disambiguation pages are not search indices. Do not add links that merely contain part of the page title (where there is no significant risk of confusion)."
This disambiguation page lists many people that are likely not just known by their forenames, so I'd like to get rid of most of them on this page. Unfortunately, I don't know most of them, and some of them may in fact be known by just their forenames. If that's the case for a person listed below, please cut-paste them back onto the disambiguation page.
* Gisele Abramoff, vocalist of the Brazilian musical group Dalimas
* Giselle Blondet, Puerto Rican actress and show host
* Gisele Bündchen, Brazilian supermodel
* Giselle Fernández, an American television journalist
* Giselle Gonzales, Australian host of the Pinoy TV Music Lounge tv show
* Gisele Jackson, American house music diva
* Giselle Khoury, Lebanese talk show host and widow of Samir Kassir
* Giselle Laronde, won the 1986 Miss World representing Trinidad and Tobago
* Giselle Loren, sometimes credited as Giselle Achecar, a voice-over actress in video games and animated series
* Gisele MacKenzie, Canadian singer
* Gisele Miro, Brazilian tennis player
* Giselle Yum, Filipino pornographic star
The articles on What links here only mentions pornography, so I guess Giselle Yum is the only person likely at this moment to accidently be referred to on this disambiguation page, so I'm leaving her in. – sgeureka t•c 21:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation. It helps alot. I didn't know about that policy until now. - Mtmelendez (TALK|UB|HOME) 12:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have cleaned up other disambiguation pages in the meantime where the differentiation for the names is not as clear or even not encouraged (e.g. Frost (disambiguation) and Camille). MoS:DAB#Examples of individual entries that should not be created allows the creation of pages à la Giselle (given name) or List of people named Giselle, so if someone sees the need for such a page, please do so and add the new page's name to the "See also" section here. – sgeureka t•c 16:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I created a new article to list the given names. I hope that adheres more to policy. Thanks for your help. I'll try and help out in cleaning up similar disambig pages. - Mtmelendez (TALK|UB|HOME) 21:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:JUDO (software)

message: Are you sure this is a notable enough topic for wikipedia? I would not like to see any wasted effort on this article only to see it deleted. By analyzing for this topic I do not think it is notable. It may be hard to maintain it also for its verifiability. If there isn't external reliable sources (the primary source, i.e. project homepage, does not count) this article will pretty much be deleted. Also if it's stand like it is right now, even less than an appropriate stub it will certainly be speed deleted. I think its best to discuss it here in the talk page before tagging the article out of civility ;-) Regards Loudenvier 21:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
File talk:GeoChavezMemorialBrig.JPG

message: This picture really could be much better--right now it's just a black outline of a statue.  Is there anyone in Switzerland (or soon to vacation there) who could take a few snaps and upload them, maybe on a sunny day?
Yvh11a (Talk • Contribs) 21:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Picture Request
Talk:UFO sightings in Canada

message: *the following was not sourced so i removed it; please add it back to the list when source(s) are added (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 20:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: nonsourced

message: Hello we are a UFO research group located in the province of Quebec Canada
I`m asking you if it would be possible for wikipedia to add a link on the page ufo Cnada our site is www.quebec-ufo-research.com
Regards
Ken
administrator of quebec-ufo-research.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Explore00 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Dead Link.Chantern15 (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  can you please add us as well with link 

message: Attempted to revert vandalism - unsuccessfully - on the page. May be some kind of edit conflict so please don't assume it was my intention to restore the obscenity-riddled version if that is what has happened. :S  Keristrasza (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved, I think. There was a blacklisted link which was preventing the page from reverting =/  Keristrasza (talk) 12:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Please read the notes on the top of all Wiki talk pages.
Not the place for offensive comments calling eyewitnesses "crazy" and suggesting they are "hallucinations". How can we rid wikipedia of these supremely arrogant loud mouthed pseudo skeptics and their tiresome condescension?
Original research and eyewitness accounts are against wikipedia policy is all you had to say.
121.223.5.56 (talk) 03:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  not the place for crazy stories of personal experience (aka hallucinations) 

message: Are there any reliable sources for the UFO sightings by Corina Saebels besides this one article and one video?Chantern15 (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: YouTube isn't a WP:RS. Hows and Whys appears to be some kind of non-notable clickbait site written in very poor English. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I should've phrased that better. My intention wasn't to imply that YT or HAW are reliable. Are there reliable sources for these UFO sightings?Chantern15 (talk) 18:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The HAW article is actually a lot more calm and less sensationalist and goes more into the details, than this established mainstream news channel in Vancouver, Canada:
Chantern15 (talk) 01:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corina Saebels, British Columbia, Canada, 1969, 1991, 1993 & 2003
Talk:UFO sightings in Brazil

message: In my opinion, this article doesn't fit in such category. -- 201.69.181.201 11:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Brazilian culture 
Talk:Malcolm Dome

message: Very significant rock biographer74.69.39.11 (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Point taken. I've done some research on the net and this guy is a significant author. Drmonkey666 (talk) 04:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD Comment 
Talk:FreeCol

message: This is a fairly popluar game with 17,000 hits in Google. Kc4 21:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a few styleistic edits and removed plagerised material. Kc4 21:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: Is it within the scope of the Wikipedia article to discuss the development of the game? Information on this could be found on the game's website and from the project of the month article.
193.157.182.115 13:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Development Information

message: http://www.freecol.org/news/freecol-0.11.0-released.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anttipng (talk • contribs) 19:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  FreeCol 0.11.0 released 

message: FreeCol has a rather decent manual, and it's covered by the civilization wikia to some degree (+libregamewiki). Can we please get rid of some details here as suggested by Qwertyus in this diff? –Be..anyone 💩 05:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a manual
Talk:Build Me Up Buttercup

message: Is it just me, or is this everyones favorite song? Just wondering! LILLYofTHEsouth 21:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They get deleted because lyrics are copyrighted material. You cannot legally reproduce the lyrics of modern songs as they are protected under copyright laws. If they are posted they will be removed each and every time. Ben W Bell talk 01:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There should be a bot that spots copyrighted materials. NHRHS2010 Talk  19:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And watch the edit summaries, please. When someone removes a copyrighted material, explain it in the summary as well instead of just "Oooooh ooooooooh oooh". NHRHS2010 Talk  22:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Born in 1981, Frank Turner could not possibly have recorded a cover of this song in 1969. Gebuskrost (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank Turner?  

message: I noticed that there are some re-recorded versions of this song (such as this from 1970 or this from 2000). Can somebody please shed some light on the variety of versions for this song?--Einar Moses Wohltun (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-recorded versions
Talk:Ynyshir

message: This article contains no encyclopedic material whatever, and should be deleted.  How about a proper article on the Rhondda as a whole.  Current valleys settlement articles just seem to be based on a sterile list of modern local government units.  The articles are without exception of dire quality. . . . LinguisticDemographer 21:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:AOM French Airlines

message: Recently, a viral video was discovered involving a stewardess fondling her breasts in front of the pilots, mid flight. It was released after the bankruptcy of the company.
I suggest deletion.
Comar4 Comar4 (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate entry / unverified. 

message: http://www.bea.aero/docspa/1999/f-di991221e/pdf/f-di991221e.pdf
* http://www.webcitation.org/5zlt4ndHf
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Of Cubana/AOM accident report
Talk:List of volcanoes in Antarctica

message: There should be a List of mountains in Antarctica article. A hi! 19:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of mountains in Antarctica|Mountains]] 

message: A map would be a great addition to this article.  Toddst1 (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Possiblity to use Bingham et al's map figures from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/content/461/1/231/tab-figures-data (under CC-BY 3.0 license). -- Joedf (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Flexible electronics

message: As discussed before, I think this article should be renamed "flexible circuit boards" or something along the line. Flexible and printed electronics is a new area of research that would warrant its own article in my opinion. There are many new journals on the subject and "flexible and printed electronics" seems to be the commonly accepted name.
84.249.26.44 (talk) 12:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that flexible circuit would be a better name than flexible electronics.  Often, flexible circuits contain no electronics.  I cannot agree with flexible circuit board.  Although people do say that, a board is a hard stiff thing.  A flexible board is a non-sequitur.  However, moving a page involves a lot of work that the mover is expected to handle.  See Wikipedia:Moving a page. Constant314 (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flexible electronics vs. flexible circuit board