lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alturas Indian Rancheria

message: I took the liberty of moving this page from Alturas Rancheria to Alturas Indian Rancheria, since this is the legal name of the tribe and will now sync up with internal links for the tribe. I hope this is acceptable. Statistics reveal the page did not previously receive much traffic. Cheers, Uyvsdi (talk) 01:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving 

message: This article talks about the people living on the reservation in the past tense as if they do not exist anymore. It should be updated to include information on these people as they live now. Information about the past should be in a "History" section, and may be more relevant to the general Achomawi page. Tea and crumpets (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note that everything about the tradition and culture is not cited. We need sources for this. Tea and crumpets (talk) 19:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense, need citations
Talk:JGA

message: ----
OK. Starting this to me. I did not have to edit this page. It was an view source. I did not have given a red link. Starting this. I would not starting this article called Don Wee  and this will probaly let this into that . Startring my articles not right. No articles were found yet. Dog sillmis. Not the SANTIC fells like MSN. It's not just keeping this article a littles bit more fansoin. So. Sometimes I started SSATV. If that was stand for Sixty Second Scope Telvision. This is the power. Not sometimes I wish had to stop the search engine. No way. But I am still not right. Just then. Well. it is done with this.--69.208.158.140 (talk) 18:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Toronto FC

message: How can they have a rivalry against Montreal when they aren't even in the same league?
Explinations? TheVaultDweller 16:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They play in the Canadian Championship every year. Noonehasthisnameithink (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Haven't seen any objections, despite his all-important header the other day, there's far more worthy candidates to be considered a key figure. - themodelcitizen (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking of which, since when do we have a rivalry with Dallas? Removed them. Noonehasthisnameithink (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:PTK2B

message: Hard to see refs for the individual claims. - Rod57 (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function section looks like the Summary in the gene DB 

message: Its in the infobox as a synonym, but in the Avraham ref title it is "related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK)". ? - Rod57 (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Is RAFTK the same
Talk:Mean Machine (sailing team)

message: This article is titled Mean Machine Sailing Team and is about a very successful sailing team with achievements in several different boats.  Mean Machine is a boat and hence needs a separate article which can be categorized under "Yachts" or "Individual Sailing Vessels". "Mean Sailing Machine Team" is not a Yacht or an Individual Sailing Vessel.  Recommend you start a Category "Sailing Teams" (it may already exist).  Do you agree?  Thanks,  Boatman (talk) 21:41, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorisation of [[Mean Machine Sailing Team]]
Talk:MLS Cup 1996

message: To rename the article to "1996 MLS Cup". MLS Cup '96 sounds more like an advertisement than a proper article name. 'Tis why the title of the 1966 World Cup isn't named "England '66". Hitmonchan (talk) 03:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved   (non-admin closure) JC7V (talk) 06:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Consistency is not required, but it is one of the five WP:NAMINGCRITERIA goals. I think that the proposed titles also marginally improve "recognizability" and "naturalness", and are equal on "precision" and "conciseness." –BLAIXX 21:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  But you're playing consistency against recognizability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 December 2018
Talk:MLS Cup 1998

message: the Post-match section states that "the Fire became the first expansion team to win a U.S. major league championship". The following sentence says that Philadelphia won the NASL in their inaugural season. The seems like a contradiction to me unless I'm missing something obvious. BLAIXX 19:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Most sources agree that the Fire were the first to win in a major league, as the original NASL was not considered to be a mainstream major league. SounderBruce 20:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Maybe I'll try to rephrase that second sentence to provide context. BLAIXX 14:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First expansion team to win a U.S. major league championship
Talk:Ray Moore (comics)

message: Propose that the article be moved per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline, 
to fall in line with all the others using (comics). Considering that Ray Moore was not an "illustrator" in the designer sense, but was a comics strip artist, I feel this article shouldn't be named as it is.
Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? MURGH disc. 18:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With no comments after 2 weeks, I'll procede with the move. MURGH disc. 00:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: It's good to get the names of Ray Moore's great-nieces. But what about their partners and children? 2A02:AA1:1009:DE37:5C65:62C6:6CAC:E69E (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great-nieces
Talk:MLS Cup 2002

message: *Preview: AP, New York (Galaxy), Boston, ESPN
*Game summary: Boston, Hartford, New York, LA, SI, USA Today
SounderBruce 06:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Playoffs Guide, MLS Media Guide, Match feed from MLS, Newsstand (Oct. 19), MLS summary SounderBruce 08:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Domus Academy

message: has recently arranged for the page  http://www.domusacademy.com/site/home/about/creative-director.html to be changed from the wording "Gianluigi Ricuperati joined Domus Academy as Dean at the beginning of 2013. Under his expert leadership, DA has further established and strengthened its reputation as being a leading Design and Fashion Academy." (as at present still shown in the Google cache of the page; see also User talk:E2taswords) to "Gianluigi Ricuperati joined Domus Academy at the beginning of 2013 ...", it seems that that editor may have a conflict of interest here. I've tagged this page accordingly. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest

message: More than one contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest #2
Talk:MLS Cup 2003

message: *MLS Archive (Nov. 2003): Analysis, Styles, Recap (alt)
**Preview and Statistics
**2003 Season Summary
**Player by Player
*Sports Illustrated Archive
*Previews: LA Times (p. D7), LA Times (p. D3)
**Bay Area: SF Chronicle, Mercury News
**Chicago: Tribune, Sun-Times
*Summaries: LA Times (p. D1), Bloomberg/NYT, Washington Post (Season Recap), SI, Deseret/AP (p. D6)
**BigSoccer thread
**Bay Area: SF Chronicle (p. C1 / archive), Mercury (p. A1, image), Oakland
**Chicago: Tribune, Sun-Times
*Stadium news: June 8
*Retrospective: Danish Gangster, Jamil Walker
*Aftermath: 2005 move; 2003 San Simeon earthquake (Dec. 22)?; Yallop and Canada
SounderBruce 07:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:MLS Cup 2005

message: *Previews: 
*Post-game notes from MLSnet
*Summaries: Index; MLSnet, Dallas MN (p. C1), LA Times, Boston Globe, Houston (p. 1), AP via Denver, Washington Post. Soccer America
**"Galaxy are lowest-seeded team to ever play in the final" (USA Today, p. C12)
SounderBruce 01:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources
Talk:Mission Boston

message: the Trivia section in the IMDB listing for Saving Private Ryan indicates that part of this battle was the inspiration for the final battle scene at the (fictional) Ramelle. Can this be confirmed/documented and added to the article? DarkStarHarry (talk) 19:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for final battle scene in "Saving Private Ryan"
Talk:Singmaster's conjecture

message: There's an error in one of the binomial coefficients listed for 7140:
    {7140 \choose 1} = {239 \choose 2} = {36 \choose 3} 
239 is an error because 239*238/2 = 28441, not 7140.
The correct value for this binomial coefficient is 
{120 \choose 2}
120*119/2 = 7140.
Jeff Caveney  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.2.245.250 (talk) 18:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: In 1995, 3003 was the only known number appearing 8 times .  Is this still the case? DRLB (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps David Singmaster knows the answer to that one; you could ask him. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

text: More updated information appears at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PascalsTriangle.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.80.21 (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3003 

message: I conjecture that Rodica Simion's Ph.D. thesis in 1981 was the first occurrence in print of the term that is the title of this article.  I find it in a 1989 paper written by others, but there it refers to something else—a conjecture on permutations. Michael Hardy (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance of the term?
Talk:Frank Rennie

message: I obtained permission from the Alexander Turnball Library to use an image of Frank Rennie from their collection. However, as it would only be licensed for use of Wikipedia and could not re-produced without permission, it is not acceptable to Wikipedia's image use policy. As it is extremely unlikely  that the image would be released into the public domain, I will instead provide a link to the image as the best alternative. O.Duke (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph of Frank Rennie 

message: The NZSAS headquarters at Papakura Military Camp is named 'Rennie Lines', in honour of Frank Rennie. This should be added to this page 27.252.5.69 (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rennie Lines
Talk:Ring Up the Curtain

message: Having just watched Ring Up the Curtain, I can say with confidence that the image in the infobox :File:Ring Up the Curtain (1919) - 1.jpg doesn't appear anywhere in the film. Perhaps it was a promotional photo which Moving Picture World mistakenly characterized as a still? If you go to page 666 of the relevant issue of Moving Picture World (which is available at the Internet Archive and where the Wikipedia image file says the image originates), the picture doesn't appear, so the attribution appears to be inaccurate. I'm reluctant to change anything here as I have little experience editing pictures on Wiki, I don't know what I'd replace the image with, and "I just saw the movie myself" probably qualifies as original research. Any suggestions? Tigercompanion25 (talk) 04:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this. Probably worth alerting the editor who uploaded it -  - can you help with this query? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I have not seen the film, but the caption in the magazine where the image appears, Moving Picture World (May 3, 1919, page 666), clearly states that it is a scene in the film. Although it is possible that the scene depicted was edited out of the final film, it is easier to conclude that the caption is incorrect and that it was a promotional still that was posed on the set of the film. Note that the definition of film still includes all the posed shots associated with the film (although the best are still scenes from the film). I suggest (and will implement) that the caption for the article be revised to "promotional still" to reflect your review of the film  if that is an agreeable . Deanlaw (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Deanlaw, that sounds like an excellent solution. I greatly appreciate your work in connecting images to film articles. My thanks also to  for knowing where to go with this. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

text: No problem. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo doesn't actually appear in the movie
Talk:2008 MLS All-Star Game

message: Should all these players be noted? 
 Because the All-Star Game is a competitive format featuring an international opponent, fewer MLS players participate in the game than did when it was an East-West format. But a total 32 players, in accordance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement, earn All-Star recognition:
--Coppercanuck (talk) 14:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  32 man roster? 
Talk:Clásico centroamericano

message: I suggest that Summer Olympics qualification matches shouldn't be removed because in the past those confrontations were considered "serie A", differ from today that are U-23. 76.18.18.222 (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summer Olympics qualification matches removed 

message: I don't know anything about the validity of this rivalry, so I'll let others comment on that.  But this article is so poorly written it is almost unreadable.  It needs a significant update or should instead be deleted. 2603:7080:9701:87A6:69E3:421B:6CE0:5BA4 (talk) 02:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is unbelievably poorly written
Talk:2005 MLS supplemental draft

message: Perhaps the article could mention what sport this relates to - I have no idea..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.45.130 (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:O-minimal theory

message: I think it's much easier to avoid name clashes by choosing adjective + "theory" or adjective + "structure", whatever is correct. If both notions exist, I would prefer adjective + "theory". If the other notion is really more general, we can split later. --Hans Adler (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved here from "o-minimality" 

message: Right above the Contents there is a sentence "In other words, any set definable in M by an arbitrary formula is also definable via a quantifier free formula using only the ordering. " I understand this as "o-minimality implies quantifier elimination," which I think is not correct. O-minimality does not depend on the chosen language while quantifier elimination does. As an example consider (R,\cdot,<), which is - such as (R,0,1,+,-,\cdot,<) - o-minimal. But (R,\cdot,<) does not admit quantifier elimination: for instance, \forall y(x\cdot y=x) defines the set {0}, which cannot be defined without quantifiers.
Thomas-sturm (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, it's misleading. "In M" is a hint that we are talking about unary sets, i.e. subsets of M1, not M2, M3,..., and this hint is definitely too subtle. This article seems to be a bit neglected. I will have a look later today. --Hans Adler (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Definable in the article means definable with parameters, another thing that's not emphasised in the lead.  Your example is thus definable by x = 0, and any definable set in the domain is definable with the end points of the intervals and the individual points as parameters. Chenxlee (talk) 07:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Parameters don't have to come from the interpretation of the language's constants, though, just some subset of Mn. Chenxlee (talk) 10:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

text: We don't actually change the language. It would make no sense to do that because we look at all models of the theory. (At least the proper model theorists do; there are "applied" model theorists who keep the model fixed.) We keep the original language fixed, but nevertheless work with "formulas" such as \phi(\bar x,\bar b), where \bar b\in M is any tuple from M. An equivalent formulation of o-minimality without doing this: For every formula \phi(x,\bar y) (one variable x, many \bar y) there is a formula \psi(x,\bar z) such that M\models\forall\bar y\exists\bar z\forall x(\phi(x,\bar y)\leftrightarrow\psi(x,\bar z)). --Hans Adler (talk) 18:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: O-minimality vs. existence of quantifier elimination
Talk:MLS supplemental draft

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 March 2024
Talk:Bids for the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics

message: I copied the info box from the 2010 Youth Olympics page, but there are some problems.  What shows up on the page doesn't match the codes.  Can someone help me out? ---Cbradshaw (talk) 19:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box

message: What's up with Norway? How can it have hosted 3 YOGs already, when the first one hasn't even occured yet?!!??!!?? 70.55.203.112 (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been clarified.  Thanks for pointing it out.-Cbradshaw (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lillehammer
Talk:Anticato

message: I came to this page seeking information about what the Anticato was actually about, i.e something substantial in the text which inspired admirers of the work (according to Plutarch). Who knows what it was actually about? Doktor Waterhouse (talk) 15:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I sure don't! 00:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article has nothing to do with the content of Anticato. It gives a few amusing anecdotes about Cicero and Cato. The article states that some fragments of Anticato survived. Perhaps it would be nice to describe their content and not gossip about how Caesar seduced Cato's half sister. Meishern (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of Anticato?
Talk:Palaeoloxodon cypriotes

message: Human interference leading to the extinction to the Cyprus dwarf elephant has been a controversial topic over the last decade. A rising theory is that most of the elephants became deceased during the settlement of the Mediterranean islands. A claim to support this theory is that the early Greek settlers thousands of years later incorporated the dwarf elephant into their mythology calling them Cyclopes (one-eyed monsters). This is because the skull of an elephant shows a single large hole on the forehead which does resemble an eye socket - the actual eye sockets are placed quite low on the sides of the animal's head and thus easily overlooked.[citation needed]
So, humans were so proficient to know those elephants, that the 'proof' was their interpretation of the skull as cyclope?!? So why not to add the dinosaur extinction to who found some bones and calle them 'dragons'? Totally nonsense. 62.11.3.98 (talk) 02:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Talk:San José de Apartadó massacre

message: It is clear that there is far more written on the Spanish page for this same subject.
I don't speak Spanish. 
Please could someone who does consider translating the Spanish text into English on this page, so that we can all learn a bit more about the massacre, and about the Peace Community at San José de Apartadó.
Thanks,
Eric  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.101.44 (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian cinema

message: Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 06:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 Bot Beta
Talk:Achilles (Marvel Comics)

message: This article should be renamed as Achilles (comics), since it now discusses more than one character. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, more likely, Achilles (Marvel Comics). I'm reasonably certain that characters named Achilles have appeared in other publishers' works. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 23:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Achilles (comics)]]
Talk:Eastern deer mouse

message: New content has been added by Samantha Jonen, as part of the Introductory Animal Biology coursework (Fall 2007) at the University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point. The changes were also reviewed by two other students.
:the sources are very much appreciated - but please use a wikified method for citing next time. thanks!  - Metanoid (talk, email) 22:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought there was a policy that article titles should be the most widely recognised name.  This article actually states that these animals are most commonly known as deer mice.  Should we consider a move/re-titling?__DrChrissy (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Deer mouse"?
Category talk:November observances

message: Just out of curiosity, why is All Soul's Day listed here but not All Saint's Day? All Saint's Day falls on November 1, so why is this not here? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

message: All right, since typing the above comment, I did add All Saint's Day, and it is now visible from my home PC. However, I did not see it on the PC I use at work  - which, given that the PC I have in my work office is older than this one, is not surprising. Then again, I should not really be spending time looking at topics which are not directly relevant to my field (psychology) at work  - I have to confess, here! ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: All right, this day is visible from some PCs now
Talk:Northern grasshopper mouse

message: New content has been added by Jessica Edward, as part of the Introductory Animal Biology coursework (Fall 2007) at the University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point. The changes were also reviewed by two other students.
I hope you failed. I'm cleaning article up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.193.94 (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New content

message: This article has now been cleaned up to Wikipedia standards and the references and external linked have been properly laid out. Daniel (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 4 April 2008 - Clean Up