Talk:ZETA (operating system)

message: I've just setup Zeta (OS) as a redirect to this page, this is the same scheme as other OSes listed on Wikipedia, and i'll also edit the Zeta disambiguation page to point to Zeta (OS) instead.
Reminder, replace screenshot with one from r1; flesh out the body a bit more.
: AberBeta 09:25, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Link to product page is dead. Remove?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.193.212.12 (talk) 12:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 

message: This page is now outdated. R1.21 is shipping, and R1.5 is expected to ship in 4 days. I'll probably get the 1.21 LiveCD to get new info. --71.220.27.249 20:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: :Image:Zeta2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Zeta2.png

message: Prior comments:
* Now I don't understand how yellowTAB can make changes to the messaging system if they don't have  access to source code.
* - They have access to source code
* - I know, it just said in the article that some people doubted that:
* and question whether yellowTAB has the complete access to the source code they would need to make significant updates.
Okay, so the major changes to the Messaging system were entirely made by Be Inc. The Dano Release of BeOS contained many of these, including a new flattened message format and a heap of optimisations and changes that made the messaging systems or R5.03 and Dano incompatible. 
What YellowTab did was change a few defines in the header files to make certain methods in BMessenger (IIRC) less likely to be used without extra work.
There's a big article that Dianne Hackborn wrote about this subject. Might be interesting to quote from that.
Memsom (talk) 13:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messaging system 

message: One of the downfalls of Be Inc was the Personal version of BeOS. They released this at a time they were refocusing their development work on BeIA (BeOS for Internet Appliances) and so it probably seemed like a fair deal. Prior to that, the only free versions of BeOS were back in the Developer Release and Preview Release time. No version of BeOS post PR2 was EVER given away for free *without* it being a limited CD only version that did NOT install to a hard drive and would not open existing BFS formatted volumes. In essence, the language of the author who wrote the section is whiny and TBH not giving a full historical perspective. It should be toned down and references to the notion that there should have been an entirely free "personal" version, removed. They serve no purpose, the notion was not prevalent throughout the BeOS community and given that Be Inc lost 90% of their BeOS R5 sales after it became common knowledge that Personal could be hacked on to a real partition and that they really lost hardly anything worthwhile by doing so, I would put forward that it is actually pretty insulting to BeOS to make such a claim. Memsom (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of "free" version 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Magnussoft ZETA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030020855/http://www.zeta-os.com/cms/news.php?extend.49 to http://www.zeta-os.com/cms/news.php?extend.49
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007025153/http://www.zeta-os.com/cms/news.php?extend.50 to http://www.zeta-os.com/cms/news.php?extend.50
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012211052/http://zeta-os.com/cms/custom/zeta/indexe.php to http://zeta-os.com/cms/custom/zeta/indexe.php
*Added  tag to http://zeta-os.com/cms/plugins/content/content.php?content.15
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Reference from the main Haiku developer :
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16906198
BeOS absolutely did not have a microkernel; all the hardware drivers, filesystem interfaces, and lowest-level network protocols ran in ring 0.Family Guy Guy (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be was not a microkernel