Talk:Western India

message: I think Western India is a more suitable name. Thats how it is reffered to in weather reports. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 07:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The artice needs to be expanded, on the lines of South India and North India. I am adding a few things. We can expand on culture, history, geography and other themes. --NRS| T 12:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The latest changes made to this article has included Rajasthan, which may not be wrong. However, the person who has edited has given unnecessary prominence to rajasthan and it's culture while disregarding the other states and languages. The articles needs to present information in an unbiased manner with equal importance to all the states. Stating that Marwari is the most important language of West India seems too far fetched. I shall edit it if nobody does within a few days.Jcavale (talk) 13:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defeats the purpose of the article 

message: I have edited the article and have cited the sources. It was really difficult for me as I dunno how to cite. I also would like to know the validity of including Rajasthan in west India. I have let it remain in the article. If anyone feels Rajasthan does not belong in the west but in the north, they can delete everything that is about rajasthan in the article. Jcavale (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: I do not understand why the person who has been adding Rajasthan to this article has been so stubborn. It has been deleted several times and he again writes about Rajasthan and the language is so bad. We either have to 'correct' his 'mistakes' or delete Rajasthan related information which are both tedious. The same effort and energy could be used to improve the article by adding more information about Gujarat, Goa and Maharashtra. I request everyone to to kindly look into this matter. Jcavale (talk) 06:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from South India no region is defined properly. So anyone can believe whatever he wishes to believe. Maquahuitltalk! 09:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Goans will consider themselves North Indian when they encounter a South Indian. Maquahuitltalk! 04:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please delete [[Rajasthan]] as soon as you see it in this article 

message: Is there really no formal definition of West India? If not then perhaps this article should be deleted because it will for ever be in a state of some semantic uncertainty, as evidenced by the recent edit back-and-forth and the various discussions above. - Sitush (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. See the lead for Northwestern India. This should certainly be deleted. Add to it a vandal who claimed Maharshtra belongs to NW India as well as North India. And there's another one replacing this image with this shit but that's off topic. -- Ashay (talk) 16:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Formal definition

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Western India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080911040900/http://www.nfhsindia.org/pdf/IN.pdf to http://www.nfhsindia.org/pdf/IN.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified