Talk:Bev Busson

message: I'm just a casual user of Wikipedia so I do not wish to log in, but the Commissioner's name is misspelled:  Beverley Busson (LEY) at the end of Beverley.  Someone please correct.
:Done --Ibagli (Talk) 03:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Beverley Busson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230085040/http://www.rcmp.ca:80/exec_bios/busson_e.htm to http://www.rcmp.ca/exec_bios/busson_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beverley Busson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117022614/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=da664160-5299-4ffa-9dbe-896df41024a6&k=33350 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=da664160-5299-4ffa-9dbe-896df41024a6&k=33350
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rcmp.ca/exec_bios/busson_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Thanks for the work you do for are country as you have served throughout your life, l am really bothered by the control the Prime Minister is putting on us as citizens in saying who we can support. If this is allowed the government could deem any opposition as a threat therefore limiting are rights as citizens to oppose. I am hopefully you see the danger of this passing this type of control and vote against it
Thanks 
Steve Erickson, a Canadian citizen of B.C. 207.148.176.185 (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government over reach 

message: I am concerned with the content of your debate , as l listen to it your arguments seem like I was listening to the news, or the prime minister. Not that they are always wrong but we’re the facts they presented true. The protesters went there, they thought in there given rights to protesters peacefully for some reason you labeled them as illegal. If they were truly illegal the government would not need extra power to remove them. Did you look into the story behind the flag , but painted them all with the same brush, do you know the meaning behind the symbolism for the Hindu , Buddhist community. I think the guy carrying the flag was saying,, is this the try of government you want Canada to have. I do believe that he should not have been carrying it because what it typically stands for. Do you know the full story behind the guns at the border? The overreach into the bank accounts was enough alone to defeat the motion, it had the potential and almost did to upset the financial stability of Canada.
It seem to me that you didn’t put put much thought into your arguments, or check out the truth of them for such a important vote. My hope is that we can learn from the past , our freedoms are way more important than party lines. 207.148.176.57 (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate on emergency act