lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of palindromic places

message: Is this list original research?  I'm not referring to the entries on the list; I mean the list itself.  I know that palindromes are well-studied, and place-names are well studied, but has anyone outside of Wikipedia ever studied the topic of palidromic placenames?  And if not, should we really have an article on the topic?  Xtifr tälk 19:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OR?

message: Does a single or two lettered name really count as a palindrome?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.171.61 (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eligibility
Category talk:British comics

message: I'm thinking this category needs to be clearer so it had a few entries looking at British comics and the rest are moved to more specific areas. I've made: :Category:British comics titles and placed :Category:2000 AD titles under it which pretty much removes the need for most of their titles to be here (this cat can just be removed). I've started working through them but if you are wondering that is what I'm doing. Feel free to pitch in and help. (Emperor 14:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria
Talk:Pixelpost

message: Rewritten to look less like a advert and removed the add tag.
--rct-Damien 10:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lacks a wider range of hacks available for other photo blogs.
Pixelpost has a great number of hacks/mods/addons.
So is this a factual statement?
--72.24.253.115 16:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this statement factual?
Talk:Not in the Flesh

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  12:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:End Games

message: "End Games" is filled with so many typographical errors one can only wonder if it saw print without Dibdin's having had a chance to proofread it.  Would anyone know? --68.226.16.229 (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos
Talk:Chronicler of the Winds

message: For example, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: done, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest infobox
Talk:Upheaval Dome

message: Scientists do not agree on what caused the upheaval dome, and in spite of wishful thinking, it most certainly is not for sure an impact crater. The National Park Service gives equal weight to both theories. 70.131.100.193 (talk) 19:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually multiple types of evidence have been found that prove it is an impact crater. NASA was involved in the studies that found this evidence. Sorry, but I am more inclined to believe NASA than a park ranger from Moab. I grew up there and know from experience they are all idiots. 74.214.250.169 (talk) 12:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a POV balance issue any more.  The proof of an impact isn't even new any more.  Once the evidence of shock was found in the rocks, that was proof of an impact.  Even the biggest, meanest volcano can't make enough pressure to do that.  So there is no longer any scientific reason for doubt about the impact origin at Upheaval Dome.  The park service just hasn't updated (or hasn't properly updated) their literature. Ikluft (talk) 19:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur, geologic evidence is heavily in favor of impact origin. Jstuby (talk) 04:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clarifying the new evidence for impact origin of the dome. I wasn't aware that the issue appears now to be resolved, or at least heavily leaning to Impact as the origin. --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV assertions
Talk:The Red Devils (blues band)

message: Before The Red Devils, Lester Butler and company played Mondays at the King King club in Los Angles under the name The Blue Shadows. It was the same band except Dave Alvin (Blasters) played lead guitar. When Dave left the band, The Kid replaced him and the band name was changed to The Red Devils. They continued their residency at the King King for some time after that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.208.66 (talk) 06:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  before the red devils they were the blue shadows.
Talk:Ultramagnetic MCs

message: The true way to write this group name is with an apostrophe like on their covers. So this page should be move to "Ultramagnetic MC's". Actualy "Ultramagnetic MC's" redirect to "Ultramagnetic MCs": the good redirect to the bad. Lacrymocéphale
:Standard English grammar would not support this contention. Kittybrewster  ☎ 10:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll bet it's a lot like Booker T. & the M.G.'s and how they spell their name, even though it's wrong as all get out.  Another commonality is the awesomeness of the music. - Team4Technologies (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to fit typo 

message: If Keith "originally" founded the group, but the group is now "composed of" three people (none of whom are Kool Keith), that means he is not a member.  Right? But there's an image of him performing with the band in 2011, so I'm not sure if that's accurate.  
Submersible (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Kool Keith still part of Ultramagnetic MCs?
Talk:Cockroaches (novel)

message: Is the English title "The Cockroaches" or simply "Cockroaches"? 98.14.180.168 (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out the discrepancy. It's simply Cockroaches, without the "The". I've moved the article to correct the title. —Lowellian (reply) 07:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: 'When he obstinately refuses, they employ cruder means such as threats, blackmail, and attempted assassination.'
Makes it sound like Hole's superiors tried to assassinate him.  After threats and blackmail.
That's not the plot of this story at all. 2601:152:4E01:DA20:E4EC:FB04:171C:22F3 (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:2007 Romanian presidential impeachment referendum

message: The law was changed, the referendum doesn't need absolute majority anymore, it only needs simple majority (half+1 of the people who vote). 89.120.193.125 11:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since I can't read Romanian and the articel doesn't appear to exist... what is a "Stakes-Piramids" that they're talking about being set up in a park somewhere in the Capital? 68.39.174.238 10:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly... 

message: The info box says that 75% of the people voted against impeachment. No county in the map is colored as over 75%. I think there is an error somewhere.
139.78.143.16 (talk) 20:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is something wrong with the map? 
Talk:Aliquot stringing

message: I believe Mason & Hamlin Pianos also utilize separate aliquots which are individually tunable, not standard duplex. Mbeiers 11:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not sure.  Mason & Hamlin uses the word "aliquot" ( http://www.masonhamlin.com/craftsmanship/ ), but I'm not sure if they mean "true" aliquots, or just tunable duplex scaling.  Perhaps someone who knows can clarify. - Blueguy 72.150.208.71 (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piano brand exclusivity 

message: There are two quite separate ideas being discussed here, confusingly, in the same article. Conceptually they belong in separate articles; however, they may be too low in importance to actually have two articles. 
The lead section should be rewritten to say that there are two different topics on this page with two completely different definitions, which happen to be referred to by the same word. 
I'll do it later, if someone more knowledgeable than I am doesn't do it first. TooManyFingers (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate ideas
Talk:Combat Integrated Releasable Armor System

message: This article reads like an advertisement, discussing only a specific product made by a specific company, and giving details like colors available.  It should be deleted and merged with a more general discussion about body armor.  How does this armor fit into the broader body armor category?  What other types are available?  How has it performed?  Someone involved with military content on Wikipedia should upgrade this sub-standard and self-promoting content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garydave (talk • contribs) 16:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Christopher Wood

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Christopher Wood/Archive. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#Christopher Wood/Archive until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Certes (talk) 17:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Christopher Wood/Archive" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ranger Body Armor

message: So the article says the plates used are SAPI, but they're made of a completely different material and are made of 2" by 2" tiles.
SAPI plates are made of Silicon or Boron Ceramic, not Aluminum Oxide.  70.190.39.164 (talk) 01:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAPI?
Talk:International Diabetes Federation

message: I am concerned to note that this article is a word-for-word copy of material on the website of the organization.  I checked the history of the page and it seems as though someone from the organization had a hand in creating the page, which is why I haven't done anything.  I'd take a stab at re-writing the copy, but it's already rather well written (better than I could express it, I bet), and I personally feel this organization does good work and I want people to know about it, so I haven't done anything drastic.  I have contacted an editor by e-mail who worked on the page whose username is "IDF diabetes" who has no other edits to his/her credit, and whom I strongly suspect is associated with the organization, and asked them to intervene if indeed they are associated.    Accounting4Taste 04:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: When was it founded? (I took out a sentence that include "for more than 50 years," which would otherwise have been tagged with a when template. RJFJR (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions
Talk:Innocence Falls in Decay

message: * Can someone help me with more details? Mascal4 11:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 
Talk:Corinda railway station

message: The section that states about the Ipswich line is mixed with Tennyson line implying both are closed
--Ausisit (talk) 11:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rhodes, New South Wales

message: A separate section on remediation is worthwhile for this suburb. About one quarter of the land area will have been remediated and 2/4 of all dwellings in Rhodes will be on remediated land. About 80% of the western side of the railway line will have been remediated when the works at the former Union Carbide and Meriton sites is complete. This makes the remediation itself noteworthy. I have reinstated the section and photo. dinghy (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't deleted it. I have included it as part of development and removed spam. Wikipedia is not to be used to advertise. J Bar (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please feel free to remove any advertising as opposed to links to detailed information. The remediation is such a significant part of the story of Rhodes that it should not be "hidden" in the development sub heading, even if there is no remediation heading in some standard/common template. I have added further information, but not made any substantive change to the wording you had under development. dinghy (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on remediation noteworthy and worthwhile
Talk:Landsborough railway station

message: just an interesting note, the 615 here isn't actually a connecting service to any trains!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.26.1.26 (talk) 06:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Halka

message: Delighted to see an article on this opera. Well done! Unfortunately we normally can't use CD covers re Wikipedia:Non-free content Sorry about that. -- Kleinzach 12:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CD cover

message: Is Halka now Halina or Helen? See also the entry in the Moniuszko table. Some correction should be made either here or there or both. 83.79.129.232 (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated name 

message: Can someone explain what the bracketed word, after the title, "Halina" means? Stanisław Moniuszko#Operas suggests "Halka" means "Helen" but :pl:Halka describes it as a diminutive of :pl:Halina which in English is apparently Galina. So: why "Halina"? The German Wikipedia article goes so far as to suggest that this opera's English title is Halina; that can't be right? I suggest to remove "Halina". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if it really does mean Halina, it still shouldn't be there.  We don't translate people's names in any circumstances, otherwise we'd be talking about Joseph Green, Fred Sour Cream, Peter Seagull and Black Mountain Horse.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 10:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed here, there, and over there. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Halina?

message: In Krakow, Poland (then Austro-Hungarian Empire) in 1912 a translation of Halka became the first professionally staged opera in Esperanto, presented during the 8th World Esperanto Congress. It received favorable media reviews documented in this section of the article on Halka in the Esperanto Wikipedia. --Haruo (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1912 Esperanto presentation
Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/cocoabot

message: Just to be clear, I'm no longer running Jayden54Bot (due to time constraints/other commitments). Also, I used to clear the link lists of the Wikipedia:Dead-end pages projects, but that's only two edits a day so I didn't bother going through BRFA for that task. I did get official approval for the AfD task. I haven't given out the source code for the AfD task, so I'm assuming Cocoaguy is using his own code. Cheers, Jayden54 12:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jayden54Bot no longer running
Talk:Church Lawton

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 12:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:God Is Not Great

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians! I intend to translate the article into Greek but I am a little worried that there are too many citations to the book itself. Would that be original research? Thanks! Τζερόνυμο (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before starting tranlation....a question 
Talk:Pinellas Trail

message: It would be good to add the name of the person who helped start the committee -- rather than just "a man". MeegsC | Talk 12:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but the name is not known.  On the "About" page on their official website, that's what they say, "a man".  See the first paragraph on this page...   Sorry.  BucsWeb 11:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Committee starter
Talk:Double Island, Queensland

message: Title. 107.218.153.45 (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bump 107.218.153.45 (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason people appear to be reverting your edits is because you are adding information without a citation and the existing citations do not support what you are saying. Just add the citaiton as best you can. Kerry (talk) 03:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who keeps breaking citations?
Talk:Mr. Tickle

message: The first source states it happened fifty years ago; the article was written in 2021 so it was asked in 1971, does anyone know his birthdate? Jabberwocky ykcowrebbaJ Hatter rettaH daM (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found it’s in 1963 so he would be 8 according to http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4872780.stm, the source. Jabberwocky ykcowrebbaJ Hatter rettaH daM (talk) 17:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam's age.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Abu Usamah

message: This request for mediation case has been concluded as successful per agreement between the parties on all issues raised. Issue I and Issue III were resolved through the creation of a compromise version of prose, and added to the article. Issue II was dropped by Sefringle after discussion. On behalf of the Mediation Committee, thanks to the parties for their dedicated and open-minded involvement during this case, which most certainly contributed to its' success.
:For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 07:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Northern Cyprus

message: Many countries recognised it and i think its bias behaviour to say it is recognised by Turkey only. Sonny00 20:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a fact, not an opinion, that the TRNC is only recognised by only ONE country, Turkey.  See , , .  Kransky 04:00, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who says it is only recognised  by Turkey? 

message: Templates are supposed to be convenient tools to reference articles.  Instead this template is a bloody soapbox heaven that invites pointless arguments or wordy caveats over whether X is in Europe, or if entity Y is either a real country or just a duck farm owned by a crazy successionist.  Do we really need a template to list together all Europe-specific articles on a certain topic?  Kransky (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Europe-in-topic template 

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 

message: Legally the representative office in the United States is a commercial entity and the staff do not have diplomatic visas (they are using business visas). The commercial entity is passing itself off as a diplomatic mission. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Legally cannot be described as a diplomatic mission
Talk:Normanby Island (Queensland)

message: This article is titled Normanby Island yet it only talks about the encompassing Frankland group. There's zero detail about Normanby Is itself, except for its area. I think it should be either a) merged with the Frankland group article, b) completely re-written, or c) deleted. Comments please?  Junglenut |Talk  22:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article focus
Talk:Sir Edward Pellew Group of Islands

message: User:Lester proposed that the Sir Edward Pellew Group article be merged into this one, as the topics are identical. The other article was also shorter and the title a bit less clear than this one. 
As this appears an uncontroversial merge I have gone ahead and carried it out. Contrary views and discussion welcome, as always.  Euryalus (talk) 12:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Identical article merged into this one
Talk:Barber Island

message: Unless there is a plan for adding material to this article, I don't see a purpose to adding the geo-stub template.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  re addition of the geo-stub template to the article 

message: *This edit removed 916 characters, leaving 2708.  916/3624 = 25.3%
Previous related edits:
*2011-05-13
*2012-04-14
*2012-04-27
I also made this request on Crusoe8181's talk page, which as of 2012-05-06 did not receive a response.
WP:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages states,  Unscintillating (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor edit that removed 25% of article with the edit comment "mapit to coord+"
Talk:Stephens Island (Torres Strait)

message: It appears in this edit than IP vandalised this article by replacing "Stephens Island" with "Stephen Island". Later another user (presumably in good faith) renamed the article to match. However, if you check in the official Queensland Places Names database, it is Stephens Island also known as Ugar. So please don't change it back again! Kerry (talk) 02:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism