lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Houses of the Molé

message: Removed the unnecessary tilde from the word in order to be faithful to the actual Spanish word.
Ftalkfanatico 03:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mole, Not Molé

message: Has nobody noticed that a lot of the Bush samples on this album and Rio Grande Blood are taken from Chris Morris' Smokehammer and Bushwhacked?  In particular the parts where he is made to say 'I have a message for the people of Iraq: go home and die' and the whole 'I have adopted sophisticated terrorist tactics' bit.  I'm surprised they got away with it to be honest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.225.16 (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bushwhacked

message: The track's name was Silence, not Psalm 23, least that is what iTunes says. I think Psalm 23's real name is Silence. I can't make a reference to show you, so you'd have to see for yourselves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightingale12 (talk • contribs) 07:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  psalm 23 

message: This version of The Star-Spangled Banner was also in the film Donnie Darko (2001).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.181.247.109 (talk) 10:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Star-Spangled Banner 

message: Is this spelling in the Personnel section a typo, or is Alain Jourgenson's name really spelled as "Alien" on the album/CD? BobCubTAC (talk) 09:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Alien" Jourgenson?
Talk:Index of BDSM articles

message: OK, now we've got enough entries to construct a BDSM-specific topic list, we can start to fill in the gaps. -- Karada 20:52, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I guess since some words have no link these are sort of requests for new wikipedia entries ?194.183.196.141 07:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's now :commons:Category:BDSM symbols over on Wikimedia Commons. AnonMoos 22:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons images

message: THE PAGE HAS TWO IMAGES WHICH CAN BE EASILY USED FOR STIMULATION OF A SEXUAL ASSAULT OR RAPE . THE CASE ACTUALLY SO MUCH SERIOUS IN SOME CASES THE IMAGES ARE 
* https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Submissive_BDSM_poses.jpg
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Under_the_Bridge_by_ropemarks.jpg
EITHER USE ANIMATION OR PAINTING FOR IT THANK YOU Ravinesh rds (talk) 10:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Signature moved from heading. Please do not add your signature to the heading of posts. Secondly, please do not type in all-caps, since that comes across as yelling. If you personally find these images (which do not appear to encourage rape or assault) "dirty", there are ways for you to hide them in your browser. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY YOU USED DIRTY IMAGES IN INDEX ITSELF
Talk:Eat Your Face

message: Sorry, your edit messed up some stuff:
*It broke the image link to the album cover (yeah I know the link is spelled wrong but it links to the correct image so it doesn't matter)
*This is the band's 9th album, not 10th. Live at the House of Blues doesn't count because it was intended as a DVD release, not an album. The band promoted their next album Shave the Planet by saying "10 albums later, we're still punk," so obviously they consider Eat Your Face their 9th.
*The band's name is Guttermouth (1 word), not "Gutter mouth." This messed up the link to the band article.
Make sure to hit "preview" after you edit to make sure that your edits don't result in broken links, etc.
IllaZilla2 03:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision as of 21:41, 11 December 2006 by 70.180.90.114
Talk:1602 in music

message: Does this need it's own page?  Why isn't it just in 1602?
I haven't a clue, but apparently, someone is making a whole lot of these "year in music" articles, and I assume its to create a pattern, since there are some that resulted from over-long year articles, as I understand it.  But then again, I don't ask, I just tag them as music stubs.  --ZachPruckowski 20:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Contraband (Velvet Revolver album)

message: I heard quite a while ago the identity of the woman on the cover of this album but I forgot who it was. If anyone else knows, please add her name. NorthernThunder 04:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover woman 
Talk:Joseph Conrad

message: Jessie Conrad wrote A Handbook of Cookery for a Small House, published in 1923 (see https://www.gutenberg.org/files/67482/67482-h/67482-h.htm, for which JC wrote a rather touching preface. I think that's worth a mention in the Personal Life section. Thoughts? Plutonium27 (talk) 14:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jessie's cookbook
Talk:Correlation function (astronomy)

message: I see no reason for this article not to be integrated in the correlation function article. It will in fact introduce much needed info about applications to that article. (TimothyRias (talk) 14:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the merger proposal as it is a year old and hasn't led to any action.  The terms as used in statistics and in astronomy are related, but the definition credited to Peebles is inconsistent with the definition as used in statistics (correlation in statistics is defined in terms of moments and cannot in general be interpreted as or converted into a probability).  Therefore I don't think this serves as an application of the statistical notion of a correlation function. Skbkekas (talk) 03:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Correlation function]] 

message: This article has an important error.  The correlation function does not give the probability of finding two galaxies separated by a distance r; rather it gives the *excess* probability over what it would be if galaxies were randomly distributed.  In other words, if the correlation function is equal to zero, then galaxies are randomly distributed in space. (AAB)
: Fixed. Felix116 (talk) 10:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Current Article
Talk:Names of large numbers

message: Say the number of maximunssextillion Luccasantana (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a real number. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 22:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximunssextillion 

message: There is a reversed prime number (emirp) defined by Jens Kruse Andersen from Denmark (http://primerecords.dk) that has 1089 digits. I don't seem to find a name for it in Wikipedia. 115.64.52.116 (talk) 07:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the name of the 1089 digit emirp? 

message: The table for googol and googolplex has UM as an authority, but it hasn't been mentioned before and has no link.
I believe it's supposed to represent the HM reference, but it doesn't say that. 130.226.139.26 (talk) 07:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 12:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  HM and UM 

message: Does this make 1,000 the zeroth base -illion, and 1 the negative first base -illion? 2601:1C0:847C:50C0:A54D:85AC:91BC:7681 (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In a sense yes, since a n-illion is 103n+3.  However, this observation is original research and we are right to leave it out of the article. Certes (talk) 15:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base -illion orders of magnitude  

message: Quintillion has 18 zeros 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as stated in the article.  It can also have 30 zeros in long scale.  Does something need to be amended? Certes (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1,000,000,000,000,000,000 

message: Ten Duotrigintillion Is Also call Googol 10^100 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as stated in the article. Certes (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  10^100 (Ten Duotrigintillion) 

message: Gargoogol has 200 Zeros 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This number is documented on several wikis such as Fandom, but as user-contributed content it may not be a sufficiently reliable source to support inclusion in the article. Certes (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Hundred Quinsexagintillion is also call gargoogol (10^200 

message: Disoge has 10 zeros 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Does any reliable source use this term? Certes (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ten Billion is also call diosge 

message: 1,000 zeros Is so many 77.100.228.242 (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: One YouTuber seems to think that "googolcrime" is a number, but they don't appear to be a reliable source.  (Also, that ratio is 10900 rather than 10.) Certes (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Googolcrime has 1,000 zeros It's 10× Bigger than Googol
Talk:List of English words of Hindi or Urdu origin

message: ``Typhoon" is from  Mandarin Chinese, - `dai' (=big )  +  `fu' (= wind) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.121.18.15 (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That might be the origin of the Urdu word. The Wiktionary entry makes the point that the word likely traveled from east to west. Difficult to say though. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

text: IP, I am not sure what you are implying. However you prompted me to look a little more and  I found the long dissertation by Yule from 1903 on the subject that seems to favor Arabic over Chinese, but Hindi and Urdu do not seem to be even considered. The citation givenEtymology Online - Typhoon at Online Etymology Dictionary that cites Yule only mentions Hindi as having the same word at the time of entry to Portuguese (and then later to English) and the probable source was Arabic pilots. It seems that it is possible it is from Hindi, there just no proof. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: typhoon
Category talk:Composers

message: *This is the most confusing category ever.  Why are there lists with duplicate categories?  I'm also trying to include "composers by nationality" to this category and its not working, please help.  This is probably the worst category I've had to navigate yet. Cricket02 04:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: *Half the composers are listed by FIRST name!!!  Is there a global way to fix this? LorenzoPerosi1898 06:10, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What's with the alphabetization on this page?

message: *e.g. :Category:Composers by nationality, :Category:Composers by era, etc.? --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 18:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How about we have the Composers category consist only of subcategories

message: * - Nunh-huh 23:33, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: should categories be plural or singular?

message: It could be argued that composers should all be in one category, composers, regardless of gender. Given that the majority of Wikipedia articles on composers are about men, the category Male composers becomes like a main composer category. Compare this with the recent controversy over women American novelists being recategorized as Women American novelists (although that case was different in that men were kept in the American novelist category). What if we decided to categorize composers by sexual iorientation? We would have a category of Heterosexual composers (with a huge number of composers) and a category called LGBQ composers, with just a handful of articles.OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 12:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the composer category divided by gender?
Talk:Church of God for All Nations

message: Bold textall lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:Could you be more specific in what you think is "lies", and give documentation for anything that would correct these "lies"?? I have no stake in any of the various divisions of the "Church of God". Do you? Thanks. - Rlvaughn 23:37, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I am adding back the Africa information until someone explains why it should be removed. - Rlvaughn 03:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Oolite

message: We have found quite a few rock formations buried in clay near Hartford, CT. Each one is a round disc with concentric circles on one side and a raised concentric circle on the other side.  The size ranges in diameter from about one to 3 and a half inches. If anyone has information leading to its identification please respond to sbaldwin333@yahoo.com. Thank you.
:Have you received any response to this question? - A photograph of the feature would be useful. - Ballista 16:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would anyone object if I replaced the top image of ooids with this one:
It has a scale and shows the shapes of the ooids better.  Thanks for considering.
Wilson44691 (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I meant to move it up and replace the other. Sorry -- that is a bit confusing! Wilson44691 (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just coming back to say I thought I must have misunderstood! Yes - by all means swap them over - it's a nice clear bright picture, I think it would definitely improve the appearance of the article. DuncanHill (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace the top image?
Talk:Achilles tendon

message: Article says that the achilles tendon is "short or absent in Great Apes, but long in arboreal gibbons and humans."  Humans are great apes. Also, the comma in the quote is unnecessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.104.238 (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Humans are great apes

message: Is "exquisitely painful" an appropriate phrase in this context?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.164.115 (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is exquisitely the right word? 

message: I suggest that we add an external link to what I believe is the only listing and summary of peer reviewed Achilles tendon research on the web.  The 50+ Achilles tendon research papers listed are a selection of earlier ground breaking research, current state-of-the-art research, and research overviews. Each listing includes the research paper’s key point or points.  The URL is: http://achillestendon.com/research/  
Wikipedia’s External Link Guidelines for What Can Normally Be Linked includes: “3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[3] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons.” I believe the “Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to ... amount of detail” applies here.  
I am suggesting it here on the talk page rather than adding it myself because I have a potential Wikipedia conflict of interest:  I am one of achillestendon.com’s authors.   Thanks in advance for considering this suggestion.  
ChessFish (talk) 00:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting an external link to Achilles tendon research summary
Talk:United States Memorials

message: Is it just me, or is the Phil. Firefighters Mem. out of place on this page?  This page seems to be for "National" memorials.  --J Clear 01:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  National 

message: What is the purpose of this page? What are its inclusion criteria? Rmhermen (talk) 22:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria?
Talk:Akra–Bazzi method

message: Great, but someone should describe the method...Jorge Stolfi 02:10, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I have read Akra-Bazzi's original paper On the solution of linear recurrence equations.
In the paper, bi < 0.5 is assumed. However, on the wiki paper of Akra-Bazzi method, bi < 1 is assumed.  Is Akra-Bazzi's result right for bi < 1??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.226.43.106 (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  bi < 0.5 is assumed in Akra-Bazzi's original paper  On the solution of linear recurrence equations 

message: The theorem cannot be correct as stated. We need an assumption that g is sufficiently smooth, so that the sum implicit in the recurrence can be adequately approximated by an integral. What is that assumption? —David Eppstein (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing smoothness assumption
Talk:Body surface area

message: The following sentence contains a logical contradiction and should be clarified or corrected:
In various studies, it has been found to approximate the body's volume better than the actual measure of the body volume. This has led to wide applications of the BSA in medicine.
:This has been corrected. Thank you, Paul, for fixing the error in the formula! JFW | T@lk 09:43, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logical contradiction 

message: The formula using half-english units on this page has a base number, under the square root, of 3125, but when I went to the BC Cancer Network link on the bottom of the page, the formula had a base of 3131, so I was wondering which number is correct.
Two of my texts, as well as numerous online sources use 3131.  I could only find one online source showing 3125 so made the change.   71.33.200.105 18:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: I believe the alternative formula quoted (using natural logs) gives a wrong answer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.227.210 (talk) 10:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyd - alternative formula 

message: This article begins by explaining the rational for BSA and describes it as m^2.  The article then jumps to modified calculations involving weight but does not explain why these alternative calculations are used.194.176.105.141 (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of use modified formula 

message: The introduction mentions the use of BSA as an indicator of "Kouro".  I was unable to find any mention of what Kouro is in a medical context.  What was meant here? Myoglobin (talk) 00:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kouro?
Talk:Evans & Sutherland

message: This should be a redirect.  There is already a full article on the company at Evans and Sutherland AlainV 04:58, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That link now redirects to this article. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Does the article really merit inclusion in Wikipedia? It's a dinky company. There are hundreds of thousands, perahps million, of companies this size. Most of this article violates policies of neutrality and pushing POV.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsharvy (talk • contribs) 10:54, 19 July 2007
:Ummm, are you sure you understand the policies you're quoting? Maury 12:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the history of computer technology, you must have no idea who Ivan Sutherland is.  143.232.210.38 (talk) 00:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 143, you are replying to a comment three years old! But while I agree that Ivan Sutherland is notable, and E&S probably is, the article as it stands has no reliable sources, and therefore does not establish its WP:Notability. --ColinFine (talk) 19:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Removed the wikilink to Rediffusion, as the companies referred to on that dab page are not obviously germane - there is no mention of flight simulators. I suspect that the link should actually be to British Electric Traction, but they are not mentioned there either. --ColinFine (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rediffusion 

message: Several key E&S employees came from General Electric when the flight simulation division became part of the company. One was Rawlin Evans and another was Gary Starr. As nearly as I can recall, GE didn't see that this would be a profitable undertaking and wanted to close down operations, so the core team went to E&S. These were actually the first people in management who knew how to manufacture a product on a commercial scale. As a former employee of E&S, I can safely say that the relationship with Redifon Simulation/Rediffusion was the cash cow for decades. Redifon flight simulators are still to be found in airline and military pilot training facilities all over the world. There were two product lines - the Novoview and the CT series --17:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Flight Simulation Notes

message: I moved these comments from the film and television section:
:E&S's first movie was not the wrath of Khan ... it was many years early in TRON. ...also Jim Blinn uses E&S h/w for much of his NASA animation in the 80's ... I worked at E&S from 1979 ... Rod Olsen
Feel free to find references and integrate back into article. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 12:28, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in movies editorial comments
Talk:List of ancient Egyptians

message: To assist a reader get a better idea of who each of the people on this list are (particularly given all the similar names and complex naming issues), I have added brief descriptions for each of the individuals on the list.  I have tried to include the relevant dynasty in place at the time each indivdual lived and I have also provided a approximate date that each individual lived (sometimes to the nearest century is the most appropriate).  
All the information in the summaries (including dynasty and dates) is based on the Wikipedia articles.
I would appreciate any comments or suggestions (including any errors or omissions) about my changes.  Also, I would be interested in any comments on the concept of providing summaries of all the people on a biographical list such as this one on Ancient Egyptians.  Thanks --Chewings72 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, putting the information in a tabular format does look much neater and easier to read compared to what I have done.  The main reason I did not do that from the start was that I was worried that the table might look uneven where a "note" on a particular person was quite lengthy.  Nevertheless, I think you are correct to suggest a table.  When I get the time I will look at revising the list into a table format.  By the way, I note you added Euclid into the list.  I was wondering whether I should include in a list of Ancient Egyptians individuals who were of Greek origin/birth but who lived or worked in Ptolemaic Egypt for some, most or all of their lives.  --Chewings72 (talk) 06:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have played around with the table format a bit and decided on some fixed column widths so that the table is displayed the same across all the letters from the index. I hope you don't mind, but I shortened some of the Ptolemaic entries. I don't have a lot of free time at the moment so I can only do a little bit at a time. --AnnekeBart (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provision of brief descriptions for each individual on this list 

message: On recounting an event during the Han Dynasty, the author mentions an Egyptian Queen the Chinese called "Keliaomotela." Have you ever heard of her, or is this their name for an already known queen?74.229.102.208 (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: China & Africa