lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:LTM collection

message: I have visited the LTM Photographic Collection website, and I have noticed that the site has been redesigned recently. As part of this modification, the URL format for the photographs has changed slightly. For example, the original URL for the Looking down station platform, 1921 photo (linked from the Covent Garden tube station article) is http://photos.ltmcollection.org/images/max/i9/i00009i9.jpg, but with the new format, the URL for this photo is http://www.ltmcollection.org/images/webmax/i9/i00009i9.jpg (the 'photos' subdomain is now simply 'www', and the 'max' subfolder has been renamed 'webmax'). The images still exist at the original URLs, however, so is it worth updating this template to reflect the new URL format? Andrew (My talk) 23:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed this myself the other day and, although the old format still works, I was planning to revise the template to use the new format URL in case LTM stops supporting the old style - this is now done. --DavidCane 00:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, no probs  Andrew (My talk) 15:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Photograph URLs 

message: This template appears to be linking directly to the images. More correct would be to link to the page describing the image. This can be done if you know the image number. Currently, the template is producing a link like this, when it should be producing a link like this. The former takes you to the photo alone (which is often not very helpful), but the latter takes you to the photograph documentation page, which will tell you things like when the photograph was taken and what it is a photograph of and other details that the reader will want to know. It is also likely that those who maintain the website would prefer to see traffic going through the documentation page, rather than direct to the image itself. Once you've found a picture by searching, the correct way to link it is through the "bookmark this page" link at left, which gives the URL needed. The difference in this case appears to be: '9861981' versus '1998/61981'. You may need a bot to fix the 251 transclusions of this template to modify the parameter, and at the same time tweak this template to use a slightly different URL. Carcharoth (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct linking versus linking to image page 

message: This template now appears to be completely broken. All the pages that use it display a 403 forbidden page when clicked. It appears that the path to the image files has been changed by LTM, but also that the names of the images have also been changed, so I have had great difficulty finding any of the images for Pimlico tube station, for instance. The same issue seems to affect Template:LTM photo. It doesn't look like there will be an easy fix unless there is a way to turn the old image names into new image names. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Template now broken
Talk:I Marine Expeditionary Force

message: Here's a different twist/possible complaint. As someone who has no knowledge of the US Marines, other than passing media exposure, it doesn't tell me what it is, other than a redlink to MAGTF. I can infer from the name, and the "Recent Service" section, but it never says in the article what 1Mef is. A decription of role or purpose might be nice. - Vedexent 15:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pardon? 

message: The two FORECON companies are subordinate to 4th Marine Division: link to the official page of 4th Marine Division, where both FORECON companies are listed as subordinate units. noclador (talk) 01:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks - I stand corrected. Semper Fi! CobraDragoon (talk) 02:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  you're welcome. And thanks for the many good edits to the Marine Corps pages! noclador (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  FORECON 

message: The 1st MEF was deployed to Somalia as a part of UNITAF I or operation Restore Hope. Why is this not marked as an engagement? This should be, as it was a combat environment. Cuboidsiren (talk) 14:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't UNITAF I an engagement?
Talk:Raise Your Fist and Yell

message: Hey fellow Wikipedians! 
Just wanting to know if I can add the genre "glam metal" to this album?
Explicitly stated as being of the genre at this source: https://www.loudersound.com/features/alice-cooper-albums-ranked-from-worst-to-best
"21. Raise Your Fist and Yell (1987). The worst of Alice’s glam-metal comeback records, Fist is Coop at his most pandering and ponderous"
Thanks! AgentKozak (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the genre "glam metal" to this album"
Talk:Truth/Archive 4

message: Someone is trying to add this paragraph:
Only in the correspondence theory of truth are 'truth' and 'reality' necessarily identical. The correspondence theory of truth is necessarily correct, but does not provide a useful account of truth other than stating that only what is true is what is true, or that truth is what is real.
Correspondence theory is not a necessary truth. A necessary truth is one which is true by virture of the meanings of the words. E.g. "All bachelors are unmarried." But it is not built into the very meaning of the word "true" that true propositions are those that correspond with reality. Not even a correspondence theorist would claim that. If correspondence theory were necessarily true, then no one would ever have come up with competing theories of truth. (Just as there are no competing theories of "bachelor"!) 
What the author of the paragraph might mean is that the sentence "truth is correspondence with the facts" is so innocuous sounding and common-sensical that any theorist about truth would be hesitant not to endorse it. Indeed, some non-correspondence theorist do sometimes claim that their theories merely fill out details of the claim that truth is correspondence with reality. Since "the facts" can be given a realist or non-realist meaning, the sentence "truth is correspondence with the facts" might very well be something pretty much everyone could endorse. But that is still a very different thing from saying that it is a necessary truth.
:I think you understood what I meant quite well. In the article, the correspondence theory defines truth to be correspondence with objective reality. However, the definition of reality is often based on the concept of truth. What is the correspondence theorist's definition of reality, without relying on the idea of truth? It's because of this that I think the correspondence theory is necessarily true. --Wikiwikifast 17:07, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Correspondence not necessarily true
Talk:KPMG audit of the Development Fund for Iraq

message: I was going to put this in the main article.  But, really, it needs to be annotated, and trimmed down. -- Geo Swan 01:04, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

message: If I may, I would like to suggest Wikipedia Administrators screen for soapboxes and check their accuracy as new articles are created on Wikipedia about Iraq.  This article and most of those listed below could use some major editing and consolidating:
* Coalition Provisional Authority
* Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund
* Reconstruction of Iraq
* Civilian Administrator of Iraq
* Provisional Government
* Development Fund for Iraq
* Coalition Provisional Authority Program Review Board
* International Advisory and Monitoring Board
* KPMG audit of the Development Fund for Iraq
* History of Iraqi insurgency
* Iraq after Saddam Hussein
* 2003 occupation of Iraq
* 2003 Iraq war timeline
*2003 invasion of Iraq
*2003 - 2004 occupation of Iraq timeline
*2005 in Iraq 
*Invasion and occupation of Iraq casualties
*Human rights situation in post-Saddam Iraq
*Iraqi insurgency
*Iraq and weapons of mass destruction
*United Nations actions regarding Iraq
*Iraq disarmament crisis
*Iraq Survey Group
*Deployment of Japanese troops to Iraq
*Military rule
*Dover test
Spelling out the words of acronyms would be helpful for those readers unfamiliar with their meaning.  Is there an easy access to a spell checker in this editor? 
Ariele 02:23, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Improvement of this Encyclopedia Article
Talk:Matthews Beach, Seattle

message: If, as I suspect, Matthews Beach was annexed to the city along with Lake City in 1953 (and if someone could verify that) it should be added to the article. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:13, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
Summary: +, cit, so cl, rephrased; see Talk. Explication: See Talk:Seattle, Citing sources.
Accuracy:  Matthews Beach wrt ["with respect to" acronym] Lake City referenced. First sentence might be two. (We know we're in Washington State, that's in the article title. 'Interrupts the flow of description between Seattle and Lake City.)  Boundaries descriptions and adjacent neighborhoods names are equivalent, so conjunction other than "and". Numbers less than one hundred are generally written in words (incidentally distinguishing them from numbered items or maths at a glance). Particularly with few syllables, this makes for smoother reading. "[O]ften consider themselves belonging to" 
For safety (passenger ease), range, and scarcity of capable on-land airports, the first commercial air transports over ocean were neceessarily amphibious--others did not exist 'till WWII-era air corps development. The documented allusions provide a less than dry aspect.
Note re. Street layout of Seattle provides references for accuracy. Redundancy may be reduced.
For those not familiar, see also Talk:Seattle, Citing sources. Edits are provisional; delete _!-- --> comments in article when okay.  _!-- comment, since otherwise referenced AFAIK. Bug: ref="multiple, ~public/about" or ref="multiple" command per Multiple uses DNF. Kludge: _ref>http://URL</ref_ used for subsequent, duplicates in "Notes and References" section. ["<", ">" removed to allow display here.] {subst:Footnotes} auto including both the commentary text and the _references/> tag) refers to Wikipedia:Footnotes#Helping_editors_unfamiliar_with_this_system_of_footnotes. References manually generated as a backup. Format per MoS. DD Month auto format to user settings displays as distracting link.
Delete  in article when okay.  noted, since otherwise referenced AFAIK. Bug: ref="multiple, ~public/about" DNF. See "Bug" below "Style" section in Talk:Seattle, Citing sources.
"External Links" -> "Further Reading", per MoS Further reading/external links. "Retrieved [date]", since on-line reference links can break, (Embedded links).
--GoDot 16:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:J. Gordon Melton

message: The criticism section of this entry is atrocious. It consists of listing the times that Melton has been called the derisive pejorative, "cult apologist," without actually going into any of the substantive criticisms. Is it really notable that a lawyer from Singapore called him a cult apologist? It would be nice if the name calling were replaced with something of substance. The Kent, Krebs article looks promising in that regard. Otherwise, the media criticisms could be condensed into one sentence.Griswaldo (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --JN466 13:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a proposal that might help solve this problem, and similar ones as well. Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Religion/New_religious_movements_work_group#Proposal. Cheers.Griswaldo (talk) 13:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The problems have now been addressed. Ajax F¡oretalk 22:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: I notice that Melton is mentioned as a "key person" in the CESNUR article, but "CESNUR" isn't mentioned once in the J. Gordon Melton article. What's up with that? Grorp (talk) 01:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CESNUR
Talk:Seattle University

message: Update the information! This article is out of date, to put it mildly. Too bad Wikipedia itself doesn’t check on these articles when they become outdated. 
Since I have a forum, I’ll also say that I’m sick and tired of reading about demography and having to look at what the census of 2000-yep, 23 years ago!- showed about some city or county.
The best you can hope foris census data for 2010, which is still 13 years ago. Some articles at least are updated to 2020, but they still have antiquated census data from 2010, but which I can understand for comparison, but even these articles usually go on detailing census data from 2000! Who now would care about such outdated data? 
I don’t know why somebody doesn’t change all these to update them. Wikipedia, are you listening? Probably not. 63.155.121.65 (talk) 06:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you be specific about what is outdated?  Better yet, have you considered fixing problems when you see them?  You wrote a lot about census data, but there is no census data in this article. -- Pemilligan (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is out of date
Talk:SNK vs. Capcom

message: The article given for the reveal of a new Capcom Vs. SNK game links to an April Fools joke. There are no real plans for a new game in the series, especially not as a launch title for any new system. I erased this obviously false information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.2.12.3 (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: No New VS. Game

message: Since the SNK vs. Series seems to be primarily vs. Capcom, shouldn't the display picture be of an SNK character fighting a Capcom character?
* This is the kind of thing that pi$$es me off. Nobody cares about such details. Mr.bonus 19:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image 

message: WAT DO THESE THINGS MEAN? CAN U GIVE ME A TRANSLATION? JESUS. AT LEAST HAV THE TITLES IN REAL JAPANESE TEXT THEN WAPANESE THEN TRANSLATE THAT BITCH. GOD DAMN —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.195.132.253 (talk) 00:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHOUJOU KESSEN SAIKYOU 

message: I think we should fuse this article with the Marvel VS. Capcom series article and change the title to: VS. Capcom (series), which would explain all the VS. Capcom games. User:Looney Guy  —Preceding undated comment added 02:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fuse articles
Talk:The Zahir

message: The Mark Jason Dominus story appears to be in exactly 5 places on line, which doesn't exactly scream to me that it was "circulated around the Internet" at a level that really merits mention in an article about Borges's story. Could we possibly retail that story at Mark Jason Dominus instead (probably with a link to one of the places where it is posted), and just make a one-sentence mention of it here? -- Jmabel | Talk 01:28, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
:How about we remove it completely instead? It's just vanitycruft nonsense that doesn't belong anywhere. 216.165.144.240 20:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it doesn't belong here or anywhere else.  But it is not "vanitycruft", since I am not the person who put it in.  -- Dominus 01:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark Jason Dominus

message: What does the NT and 2 stand for? been racking my head over it.
--Ray
:It was a 20 CENTAVOS coin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.30.198.23 (talk) 05:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the zahir's marks
Talk:Single crystal

message: There are no references or images.  slambo 16:53, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted GA 

message: Why is the link treated like an external one?  --Shanedidona 16:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: crystalline copper

message: Article reformatted - uses now not a bulleted list - removed references to "monocrystalline copper" - It requires a better reference than some marketting material to prove this. (also Crystalline copper has issues too)
Should the manufacturing be covered in the individual uses sections - as the different making methods differ a lot?FengRail (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone and Tidiness 

message: Suggest merging what parts of crystalline copper can be shown to be true into this article.FengRail (talk) 20:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merge [[crystalline copper]]

message: Proposing to move Materials Engineering under "Uses" to "Manufacture" heading for cohesiveness. Bookrabbitwitch (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-heading and Heading Reorganization  

message: Use of Fluorite monocrystals as apochromatic refracting telescopes needs a citation. Bookrabbitwitch (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Thinking of making the single crystalline turbines a separate section since it is a significant application. Bookrabbitwitch (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turbines 

message: Thinking of including SMM's as a use towards the end as a new field being studied. Will include specifications on molecule vs single crystal. Bookrabbitwitch (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Molecule Magnets 

message: This section has specific information on the metals in the third and fourth paragraphs that I did not put in. I could not find the referenced materials to cite, but did not want to delete. If someone could either refute or agree about deleting some of the information, this section should discuss it. Bookrabbitwitch (talk) 03:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical Conductors
Talk:Ful medames

message: Falafels are made out Chick Peas not fava beans. Abdullah Geelah 17:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it depends. Most people seem to make homemade falafels with chickpeas, but at least over here restaurants usually serve fava bean falafel (which I find more tasty). DiamonDie (talk) 12:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falafel 

message: Can we find a picture that doesn't include incorrectly cooked eggs?  These have a green layer surrounding the yolk because they have been incredibly overboiled.  I can smell the sulfur from here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.140.140 (talk) 02:37, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, there you go, two pictures of Ful from Haleb that I took. Anyone can use them as he/she wishes:
File:فول_مدمّس_حلبى.jpg
File:فول_حلبى_مقطوع.jpg
--Emir Ali Enç (talk) 01:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Since it runs so strongly counter to both earlier and later information, it would be particularly welcome to have a specific citation from Herodotus' writings to document his assertion that Egyptians neither grow nor willingly eat beans. --Haruo (talk) 22:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herodotus citation 

message: I don't know anything about this topic, but as a curious reader following a link, the first thing that confronts me here is a contradiction. The description in the first sentence clearly says it is a dish of "mashed fava beans" but the image directly to the right is clearly of a dish full of intact beans. --Ericjs (talk) 02:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mashed or not? 

message: Ethiopian fuul is normaly served with bread, not injera.  I may be able to supply photos supporting this assertion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.67.45.123 (talk) 23:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethiopian Ful 

message: Do we have a meaning or derivation of ful medames? I know ful or foul means beans, what does medames mean?Gymnophoria (talk) 20:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Template talk:United States Courts of Appeals

message: Is it just me, or is the status of PR, VI, AK, HI, etc., a little hard to figure out?  The addition of 3 more numbers in the middle of these floating states and territories would help a lot, I think. -- Beland 02:08, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you like the new version better?  --Russ Blau (talk) 19:27, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

text: (FTR, image history is here, though you may need to be an administrator to see it. -- Beland (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of non-contiguous states and territories

message: I was a little confused when I read this thread and checked out the page history, because it seems as if no editing had occurred that would justify Russ Blau's comments.  Then I checked out the image and its history, and all became clear:  Russ Blau edited the image to add in numbers next to the floating states and territories.
— DLJessup (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (FTR, image history is here, though you may need to be an administrator to see it. -- Beland (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on the above thread

message: Despite its name, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is not actually a United States court of appeals.  (Ya gotta love our Congress!)  So I'm fixing the template to remove it.  --Russ Blau (talk) 19:11, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it from the template again. The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is an Article I tribunal, not a circuit court. Billyboy01 (talk) 20:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Talk:The Last Temptation (Alice Cooper album)

message: I was just listening to this again, and forgot just how much the verses of Lost In America sound like the Beastie Boys 'Fight For Your Right To Party'. And it's REALLY similar. Anyone remember if anything was made of this, legal action etc.? PolarisSLBM 18:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight For Your Right 
Talk:Rumaki

message: This page links to the disambiguation page Water chestnut, but I'm not sure which sense is intended.  Can you help?  Thanks. — Pekinensis
I've never eaten rumaki, but as far as I know only the Chinese variety of water chestnut is used in East Asian cuisine. But on second thought the answer can't be that simple, because you speak Chinese and presumably have a better knowledge of the food than I do.  Sorry for the non-answer.Anty 00:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water chestnut? 

message: Text says that the earliest known reference is on a "Don the Beachcomber" restaurant menu; so what evidence is there that it was invented by Trader Vic and not Don the Beachcomber? --macrakis (talk) 22:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inventor

message: bacon-wrapped SCALLOPS are a common appetizer in the US; bacon-wrapped shrimp a little less so.  did these precede rumaki or are they variants thereof?  that is, was the substitution of liver and chestnuts for scallops the key to "inventing" rumaki, or was the whole CONCEPT of bacon-wrapped anything nonexistent at the time?  66.105.218.10 (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  specific dish or whole genre? 

message: None is given, but the -maki ending suggests at least a partial Japanese derivation. Kortoso (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology anyone? 

message: Why "citation needed" just for the golden girls episode but literally none of the other tv shows or movies? If you're going to tag one, why not them all? Kjpmi (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: got rid of trivia. left the sourced and unsourced which refer to what rumaki IS. ubiquitous references to it in humorous context is hardly significant. like a reference to wood with "wooden" stakes in Buffyverse, trivia.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed 

message: Why on earth is it useful for us to mention that someone in a TV show briefly mentions "rumaki spheres"? This ain't TVTropes. Equinox ◑ 14:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drop the trivia?