lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sellicks Beach, South Australia

message: The section called “Climate” has been removed because it is uncited and its content appears to have been redundant on the day it was added to the article in 2016.  Also, the climate data is not unique to Sellicks Beach because this was sourced, according to the revision description prepared by the contributing editor, from the following website – weather.mla.com.au.  This webpage is part of the website belonging to Meat & Livestock Australia and is where one can do a search for climate data for most places in Australia.  The search results for “Sellicks Beach SA”  indicates that the climate data comes from Noarlunga which presumably is a weather station operated by the (Australian) Bureau of Meteorology.  This can be verified by comparing the search results with the results for “Noarlunga” on Latest Weather Observations for the Adelaide Area.  A comparison just done indicates that the data from the two sources is identical.  The weather station is located at  which is in the suburb of Noarlunga Downs, South Australia which is about 20 km north-east of Sellicks Beach.   Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 04:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The removal of the section called “Climate”
Talk:Anne of Austria, Queen of Poland

message: Why has it been changed from Anna of Austria (1573-1598) to Anne of Austria, Queen of Poland? She was queen of both Poland and Sweden. Therefore, it would be more correct to say: Anne of Austria, Queen of Poland and Sweden. That name would perhaps be to long, so would'nt it be better with Anna of Austria (1573-1598)?--85.226.45.47 (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because years of birth and death are not a useful way to disambiguate. More people will recognize this Anne of Austria as Queen of Poland than as someone born in 1573. Why Poland and not Sweden? Well, for starters, she was Queen of Poland a bit longer than she was Queen of Sweden. She resided in Poland much longer than she resided in Sweden and even died in Poland. Her husband is identified first as King of Poland, which is why the article about him is titled Sigismund III Vasa and not Sigismund of Sweden. Queen of Poland is there just to disambiguate her from other archduchesses of Austria named Anne. Had there been another Polish queen named Anne of Austria, this article would've been named Anne of Austria, Queen of Sweden. Surtsicna (talk) 12:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Heather Lewis (writer)

message: :Licensing under GFDL and CC-BY-SA. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stack-based memory allocation

message: I removed an uncited assertion that growing the stack in the opposite direction would reduce the risk of a buffer overflow. This is incorrect, see  for a description of how this is done (article on how to exploit stack overflows on HP-UX PA-RISC machines, which grow the stack up)...see Stack buffer overflow for further explanation of why this is not true. Also, there was an assertion that it was the operating system, and not the hardware the determines which direction the stack grows. There are some processors that allow for a software defined direction that the stack grows, but ultimately this is done by the hardware, and in almost every case, it is not an option available to the operating system to change. --Michael Lynn 02:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Growing the stack up
Talk:Chatham Roberdeau Wheat

message: "conflict arose between the Tigers and Taylor. The conflict was resolved when Taylor commanded the execution of two enlisted Tigers who had been found guilty of drunkenness and insubordination."
The article might be improved by some explanation of how the executions resolved the conflict; it would appear at first glance that they would have had exactly the opposite effect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.160.250.253 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article should include information abuot Chathams wounding at the first battle of Bull Run.
He was shot through both lungs according to Shelby Foote.
194.71.67.10 (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wounded at Bull Run 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://books.google.com/books?id=d7odAQAAMAAJ. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MASEM (t) 15:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Wax ester

message: The entire article needs expanding; for example,
* please add an explanation of the chemical structure of wax esters that is comprehensible to a general audience, as well as the similarities and differences with related substances.
* Also include information on what kind of fish these may be found in, the biology of the fish, etc. 69.140.164.142 13:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anne of Brittany

message: *"semi-Salic law" is an odd invention.--Wetman 18:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have heard that Anne was the Regent of France during the absence of her husband in 1494-1495 (during her first marriage) and in 1499-1503 and 1509-1513 (during her second marriage). I have not found this in the article. If it is missing, was it true? Or is it simply missig in the article? If she really was regent, then it is very notable to include. --85.226.47.128 (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You may have confused Anne of Brittany with her sister-in-law, Anne of France. Anne of France was a regent of France. Surtsicna (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, princess Anne of France was regent in France during the minority of her brother. But I distinctly remember, that the queen of France, Anne of Brittany, was regent in France during the absence of her two husbands; when they participated in the wars in Italy. At least in 1494-95.  However, it was a long time ago I read about it, so I cant include this myself as I don't remember the reference. I have not read the article in wikipedia before and just assumed that it was already here, so I was suprised when I found it was not. That made me uncertain. But I don't think it is a confusion, as I remember the circumstances so well.--85.226.41.248 (talk) 11:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does say that her sister-in-law was regent during her first husbands stay in Italy. But it says nothing about who was regent during her second husbands stay in Italy. Perahps that was confused somehow. Was she regent that time? --85.226.43.107 (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regent of France 

message: Where was she buried?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 02:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial 

message: Information at Amboise indicated Anne of Brittany established a Knighthood for Women. Anne Bolyne was one and it is said that men came from all of all over Europe to find a wife from her Knighted Women of Merit and Virtue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.194.0.109 (talk) 02:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Knighthood for Women

message: The article states that she was never regent of France during the absence of her first husband, Charles. However, it says nothing at all about whether she was ever regent during the absence of her second husband, Louis. He seemed to have been absent from France several years during the 1500s and the 1510s. Was she ever regent then? --Aciram (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was she regent of France during her second marriage?
Talk:Anne of York (daughter of Edward IV)

message: When Anne married Howard, he was not Earl. His father's titles were forfeited in 1485 after the Battle of Bosworth and attainted. The "2nd Duke" was restored as Earl of Surrey in 1489; and restored as the 2nd Duke of Norfolk in 1514, and resigned the Earldom to his son on the same day. Therefore, Anne who died in 1511, was never Countess. In fact, Thomas wasn't even knighted until after their marriage in 1497. -- Lady Meg (talk) 23:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically she was Anne of York, Lady Howard as he was only a knight during her marriage to him. Or you could go with Anne Howard, but Anne of York is probably the more familiar name as she was a Princess of England. -- Lady Meg (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Anne of York, Lady Howard should redirect here then. (and Anne Howard, Lady Howard) -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fair.  I'm assuming she was never "known as" the Countess of Surrey in her lifetime? Deb (talk) 06:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Under Titles there is a note that "Anne of York would never have been Lady Howard since that style did not come into use until the 17th Century."  If this is true, she should not even be listed as Lady Howard, but simply Anne of York.  If the above statement is not true, it needs to be removed from the article.  It creates confusion.  Best would be to find out how she was referred to in the records of the time between her marriage and her death and get a definitive answer.  History Lunatic (talk) 07:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that section as it claimed she was known as "Princess Anne of England", which is wrong. DrKay (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, DrKay! 69.42.41.97 (talk) 08:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Countess of Surrey" 

message: When was this page renamed and why? She is Lady Anne Howard. We’ve had this discussion before and it was moved because she was never Countess of Surrey. Some random IP’s tried to put back in that she was the Countess of Surrey I see. Disappointing as I did research on all of this. — Lady Meg (talk) 00:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was moved in 2014. That's too long ago to undo now as a technical request. Any new move should be requested in the usual way. This time, please wait for someone else to close the requested move rather than doing it yourself unilaterally. DrKay (talk) 15:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name
Talk:Hedy Schlunegger

message: Found some references. 
Google News
The article needs more references. Use a proper template, such as . TechOutsider (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Hans Christian Heg

message: I added a citation but apparently I didn't format it correctly. I tried correcting it but I still get an 'error' message. Can someone more knowledgeable than me correct it. Thanks. American In Brazil (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed the reference. The tag was not closed properly. -Thucydides411 (talk) 09:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help!
Talk:Annibale Stabile

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it would benefit from a complete works list; a suitable image; and inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should go here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 01:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Saffronisation

message: This article documents WP:NEO "A new term does not belong in Wikipedia unless there are reliable sources specifically about the term — not just sources which mention it briefly or use it in passing". Both "Saffronization" and "Saffron Brigade" are Neologisms. Nihar S (talk) 04:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism 

message: The basic definition in the first line itself is synthesised. One of the three references provided does not exist. The other two do not define what is "saffronisation" but use it just in passing.Nihar S (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis 

message: Shouldn't this article discuss the actual events of saffronization, not merely the meaning of the term? Uday Reddy (talk) 12:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It most certainly should. I also think that the term "Saffron Brigade" has no relevance here; if anything, it should be on the Sangh Parivar page. I have boldly removed it; revert me if you will (anybody, that is, not just Reddy) but please discuss. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: This section has no obvious relevance to Saffronisation as a whole, should certainly not be a top level topic, and is clearly just POV-pushing Hindutva apologetics (despite the transparent attempt to make it seem NPOV by including a line about how "the right doesn't like this too!"). The title of the article is not "Historiography of India" or "History of Indian textbooks." Brusquedandelion (talk) 13:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted "Context of history textbook production..." section
Talk:Anthony Babington

message: The article refers to "A Traveler in Time" by Alison Uttley, stating that the narrator travels between the 1940s and 1580s. I saw nothing in the book to suggest that it was set in the 1940s: it refers to the execution of Mary Queen of Scots as being 320 years earlier, which would suggest that the novel was set during the reign of Edward VII. Uttley herself was born in the 1880s. 58.110.123.102 (talk) 23:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Traveler in Time 

message: He appears to have two birth places according to a single sentence in the text. Can anyone elucidate? Sjwells53 (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Born where?
Talk:Pogonology

message: This is the tiniest stub I have ever seen. I don't know what could be added that isn't already covered in Beards. Are there famous pogonologists? Pogonology papers? At best, I think this article calls for nothing more than a subsection in the Beard article. Ztrawhcs 13:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This stub is nothing more than a dictionary definition.  It says nothing that the beard article doesn't. I will redirect Pogonology to the beard article (and remove the former's link from the latter). 69.250.43.106 09:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: One more thing, to "Randomfrenchie", who defends this article (see comments in article history): if and when someone has something to put here besides a dictionary definition, he can certainly do so. However, even in that circumstance, that person should first consider adding his "beard study" material to the main beard article. 69.250.43.106 09:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this deserve an article?
Talk:John Pelham (soldier)

message: I know some people may have a problem with it and want to make USMA grads who went to the CSA on the right side of history, but technically, even USMA cadets had sworn an oath to the United States as had grads so, they were traitors. I mean, if some people have a hard time with it, they are in line with the Lost Cause and Neo-Confederate traditions. You cannot justify removing the label of traitor by saying, "he wasn't a traitor." If someone says, "well, does that mean it's correct to label all CSA USMA grads as traitors? Stop rewriting history." I mean, they were. Boo Boo (talk) 06:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, anyone who disagrees with labeling the Confederates as traitors must be a "Neo-Confederate Lost Cause" boogey man. Perhaps, take a moment to consider that the Lost Cause is the correct interpretation. TheSecondBattleOfManassas (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: But it is not.Boo Boo (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, they decisively lost.  I will give them that much.  Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 21:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Labeling Confederates as traitors?

message: I made an edit that was reverted, so we should discuss it here. When you use footnotes that cite a book, you need to include the page numbers. That is the reason I generally use the References section for listing the authors, titles, ISBN's, etc. (like a printed bibliography) and use the Notes section to refer to the author and page number range for each citation (such as "Hassler, pp. 122-23.") I understand that some editors prefer to use a common References section to include both reference/bibliography and citations, particularly when most of the citations are to websites or have only one instance in the article, and you are welcome to do so, but I suggest that it becomes cumbersome when you have multiple citations from an individual book, as you do here. Hal Jespersen (talk) 01:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs/Notes 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Pelham_(officer)&diff=prev&oldid=247185843  Anmccaff (talk) 05:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nine-year WikiHoax!
Talk:John Rodgers Meigs

message: Never heard of this guy.  I do not believe a lieutenant, even a "murdered" one, is notable. 138.162.128.52 (talk) 18:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Antonello Gagini

message: said to be by him... how can I send photo? Gracesusancasale (talk) 10:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tomb sculpture of a father and daughter in Tropea Cathedral
Talk:Helen Martin

message: An accurate and properly-sourced place of birth is needed in the 'Born' section for this person to help maintain the consistency of the article (i.e. The article has a place of death in the 'Died' section). Xboxsponge15 (talk) 08:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as there's a category to cover the missing place of birth, it's not usually necessary to bring it up on the article talk page unless there's some question about a source or something like that. Because talk page comments and categories are often overlooked, consider that it may be much more helpful to spend that time looking for the place of birth. In Helen Martin's case, a POB was not difficult to find. A Google search led to the Simple English WP entry, which listed the POB (without a source) as St. Louis. Another Google search ("Helen Martin actress St. Louis") led to the Playbill website, a reliable source that confirmed it to be St. Louis. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth needed
Talk:Joseph C. Porter

message: There are multiple accounts of Porter's death, and the edits should not privilege one over another without decisive evidence. I have maintained Mudd's and Oates' accounts. I have deleted the following, not because it doesn't belong, but because the contributor needs to rephrase it in order to make the meaning clear:
"According military recolects from General Marmaduke on display in the University of Missouri."
It would also help if the specific place of display could be cited -- Ellis Library? Western Historical Manuscripts?
DavidOaks 22:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Porter's Death
Talk:Pentachord

message: Wasn't the pentachord also a classical era instrument? Karl Abel composed for the Pentachord I believe. - 74.13.5.179 13:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Instrument

message: http://tonalsoft.com/enc/p/pentachord.aspx
which is copyright —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.43.172.237 (talk) 12:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article quoted, from... 

message: From the article,
:A diatonic scale comprises five non-transpositionally equivalent pentachords rather than seven because the Ionian and Mixolydian pentachords and the Dorian and Aeolian pentachords are intervallically identical (CDEFG=GABCD; DEFGA=ABCDE).
is challenged with the "original research?" tag.
The assertion in the text is a commonplace in music theory, e.g., this garden-variety user page.  - JacquesDelaguerre (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem was with the larger context of the paragraph, which includes "any five pitch classes, regarded as an unordered collection". As such, there are 21, not 7 pentachords (not necessarily with distinct intervallic content) as subsets of any set of seven pitches (including the diatonic set). The assertion in the text "is a commonplace in music theory" only under the second definition: "any consecutive five-note section of a diatonic scale". I think I have now repaired the confusion.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, maestro! Thanks for disambiguating - JacquesDelaguerre (talk) 01:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Take what down a notch? Hyacinth (talk) 08:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can see (given that this is such a small article already), this must be a nomination for deletion—at least of the second paragraph.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transposablity of Pentachords
Talk:Umpqua Research Company

message: I'm not sure what the recent changes to the article were trying to accomplish. Please discuss what you are trying to do here on the talk page if you have questions. Also if you are affiliated with URC and interested in editing this article, please be sure to read our conflict of interest guidelines. Thanks. Katr67 22:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: Is the name of the company really entirely capitalized? If so the article should probably be moved to reflect that. Katr67 22:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company name all caps
Talk:Antonio Francesco Grazzini

message: I just fixed a couple of typos, also looking at the Italian page (but I know Italian). However, I didn't see La Arenga on it. When I search for it, I see lists containing the typos that I just corrected. Moreover, La followed by a vowel is usually elided to L', in a similar way to L'arzigogolo here, so it looks as though it is wrong. 37.116.176.104 (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Arenga
Talk:Patrick O'Rorke

message: I changed the text on the link to reference just the Society article because the phrase, "Religious of the Sacred Heart", actually refers to the literal translation of the initials sometimes used by the women of this society; not the society itself. I hope this will be viewed as being more accurate but if the change is not well received, please feel free to revise it (please DO NOT just revert as that would also destroy the bridge reference addition). JimScott 13:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: O'Rorke's widow

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Correction: Patrick O'Rorke's parents did not die in transit and he was not put in an orphanage. He lived with his parents in Rochester, NY and his parents graves are there. My father is a descendant of the O'Rorke's on his mother's side. Colonel Patrick O'Rorke was my father's - Grandfather's first cousin. (moved by Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment moved from article 