Talk:Phallus indusiatus

message: My research shows that this species might actually be in the genus Phallus.  Badagnani 04:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article shows that the species is in the genus Phallus.  Other genera were proposed, but it is back in Phallus.  I don't think that there is a question.   Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct. When Badagnani wrote this note in 2006, the article was named Dictyophorus indusiatus. Sasata (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus

message: Thanks for the move.  I think there are two separate new species names, depending on whether the mushroom has the net surrounding it (this is discussed on some websites).  Can this be clarified?  Also, there are two years given:  one in the box and one in the text:  1798 and 1809.  Which is correct?  Badagnani 18:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year discovered 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I came to this article hoping to find out what the purpose of the indusium or 'skirt' that forms around the base of the mushroom. Is it for protection from larger animals such as rodents? If there is a known theory as to what its function is I would be very grateful if someone could add it. 93.97.42.178 (talk) 11:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only took 4 years to answer this, but here. Sasata (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of the 'skirt'

message: Many mycologists think that the study that says that this species produces female orgasms is complete BS and I am inclined to agree.
It is true that a peer reviewed study says its true.
This may say more about the peer review process than the ability of this fungus to produce female orgasms.
Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 12:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Aloha Alan. I don't necessarily disagree with you, but we have to follow the principle of verifiability, not truth. If someday a mycologist were to publish their contradictory opinion about this study in a reliable source, then we would certainly include that here too (going to Hawaii anytime soon?) Sasata (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

text: You are probably referring to the 1-page PDF abstract that is available on the 'net. The full study is indeed 5 pages, with materials & methods described. Sasata (talk) 23:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orgasms 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Phallus indusiatus 96871 ed2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 4, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-06-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 08:44, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Phallus indusiatus 96871 ed2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Phallus indusiatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724151331/http://www.lei.dlo.nl/leichina/files/d50cde8fcbc78dc42a68700b96b10ee0.pdf to http://www.lei.dlo.nl/leichina/files/d50cde8fcbc78dc42a68700b96b10ee0.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.bentham.org/open/tomycj/articles/V003/20TOMYCJ.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121215125021/http://artflx.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.17:6:14.LSJ to http://artflx.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.17%3A6%3A14.LSJ
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121215062110/http://artflx.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.79:3:158.LSJ to http://artflx.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.79%3A3%3A158.LSJ
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phallus indusiatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707013304/http://www.kib.ac.cn/jgsz/kyxt/zwhx/zhzlxz/200909/P020090917651746189987.pdf to http://www.kib.ac.cn/jgsz/kyxt/zwhx/zhzlxz/200909/P020090917651746189987.pdf
*Added  tag to http://ci.nii.ac.jp/lognavi?name=nels&lang=en&type=pdf&id=ART0004130421
*Added  tag to http://ci.nii.ac.jp/lognavi?name=nels&lang=en&type=pdf&id=ART0004203268
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified