Talk:Louis I of Hungary

message: I think this is an awesome article. I have nominated it for the Good Article status. It should now appear on this list. --Simboyd (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA 

message: Slavonia was not yet a separate kingdom in the XIV. century. It was a part of Hungary with a special status.
Titles of Louis (no king of Slavonia):
1350:Ludovicus, Dei gratia Hungariae, Jerusalem, Siciliae, Dalmatiae, Croatiae, Ramae, Serviae, Lodomeriae, Galiciae, Cumaniae, Bulgariaeque Rex Princeps Salernitanus et honoris montis sancti Angeli dominus.
1374:
Lodovicus, Dei gratia Hungarie, Polonie, Dalmatie, Croatie, Rame, Servie, Gallicie, Lodomerie, Comanie, Bulgarieque rex, princeps Sallernitanus et Honoris Montis Sancti Angeli dominus —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.2.156.29 (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This information should be incorporated into the article. Srnec 06:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  King of Slavonia? 

message: He founded the first university in Hungary[1] in the city of Pécs and made general efforts at Latinisation in the kingdom.
What is meant by "Latinisation"? Top.Squark (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latinisation? 

message: I was reading through the articles of the kings of Hyngary and I'm lost with Louis being the king of Sicily. There is an article of another Louis of Sicily who also is said to rule the kingdom from 1342. Is this article wrong? --83.33.122.40 (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: King of Sicily?

message: He wanted to capture Edirne... He fought against the Turks in 1364 (The Battle of Sırpsındığı = "Rout of the Serbs", near Edirne). He lost this battle! Please read this: :Stanford J.Shaw: History of the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey, Volume I    http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=E9-YfgVZDBkC&pg=PA18&dq=Battle+of+Maritsa+1364&hl=tr&ei=c8bUTNK4KIG2vwPC7PDQCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=Battle%20of%20Maritsa%201364&f=false Böri (talk) 10:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The first clash between Turks and Hungarians was at 1364 at Sırpsındığı and the Hungarians and their allies were utterly destroyed by an avangarde of the Turkish army numbering 10000 against 30000. The battle of Nicopolis was fought at 1396 under Sigismund and was a decisive Ottoman victory. There are no decisive battles between Turks and Hungarians recorded during Louis I exept Sırpsındığı.109.187.231.109 (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  He lost the Battle of Sırpsındığı in 1364 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Louis role.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: He spent much of his reign in wars with the Republic of Venice. He was in competition for the throne of Naples, with huge military success and the latter with little lasting political results.
What does it mean?
Bazuz (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear paragraph 

message: He spent much of his reign in wars with the Republic of Venice. He was in competition for the throne of Naples, with huge military success and the latter with little lasting political results.
What does it mean?
Bazuz (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear paragraph 

message: The Style of government" section was copy-pasted from http://mek.niif.hu/01900/01949/html/index1.html. This text needs to be rephrased in order to avoid copyright issues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.164.62 (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of government 

message: I am afraid your edit contradicts WP:NOR. Which WP allows us to translate both variants of his name to multiple languages, especially if he is known in Hungary, Croatia and Slovakia as Louis the Great, and in Poland as Louis the Hungarian? Borsoka (talk) 18:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you refer to a WP policy allowing us to translate names? The Polish translation of the Polish version of his name is mentioned in the article. Borsoka (talk) 18:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: ,
my concern is the word in the subject...if I check the map there is Poland, Hungary (with it's classic borders), Galicia and Lodomeria is part of Poland. The Polish and Hungarian crowns were held by the same king, but he two countries was not joined together, neither any territory was annexed or incorporated wholly or partially to each other (and/or to (Kingdom of) Hungary proper). But it is not just about the map, but the historical knowledge, such is not known. Nevertheless, if we write that Lodomeria and Galicia became the part of the Lands of the Hungarian Crown - that is not identical with Kingdom of Hungary, may be viable...please solve this somehow.(KIENGIR (talk) 10:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I do not understand your above remark. What is your concern? Would you refer to reliable sources? We are in the 1370s. What was the difference between the government of Galicia, Lodomeria, Slavonia and Transylvania? Borsoka (talk) 10:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am surprized you don't understand my concern, initially let's head until mutual understanding. Galicia and Lodomeria was not incporporated to the Kingdom of Hungary (see borders, or the map attached to this article, the corresponding territories are part of Poland). To your second sentence, the difference is that some were part of Hungary proper, some just the Lands of The Hungarian Crown (that was broader than the Kingdom of Hungary). Clear now?(KIENGIR (talk) 11:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I do not understand your above message. Please read my above message. What was the difference between the government of Galicia, Lodomeria, Slavonia and Transylvania? Borsoka (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's still amazing...I already answered your question ->the difference is that some were part of Hungary proper, some just the Lands of The Hungarian Crown (that was broader than the Kingdom of Hungary.(KIENGIR (talk) 19:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you misunderstand both the term "Hungary proper" (which does not include Galicia, Lodomeria, Transylvania, Croatia and the banates) and the "Lands of the Hungarian Crown" (which includes all realms claimed by the Hungarian monarchs). You have not answered my above question: what was the difference between the government of Galicia, Lodomeria, Slavonia and Transylvania from 1370 to 1396? I was writing about four realms, you were writing about "some". Borsoka (talk) 04:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I am surely not misunderstanding Lands of the Hungarian Crown, since I share your description about it. Regarding Hungary proper, the term may be interpreted in a twofold way, the classic Kingdom of Hungary without Croatia, and/or after 1526 the remainder Kingdom of Hungary without Transylvania. To your question again, it may be depend from which adminsitrative level we observe it. Until Louis' death, all the four was under his rule. However, if you check the map the Galicia and Lodomeria is part of Poland, while the other two is part of the Kingdom of Hungary.(KIENGIR (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I do not understand your answer. Do you think Louis I died in 1396? Borsoka (talk) 12:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see to what map you are constantly referring to. It is not a correct map and it is not a reliable source (especially, because its source refers to the year 1360 when Louis was not the king of Poland and Naples). I asked Fakirbakir to fix the map: . Sorry, but I did not imagine that you are referring to a WP map to verify your edit. Borsoka (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I did not think Louis died then. As I said, primarily I sought factual & accurate and mutual understanding at first glance on the details, however I'd have involved Fakirbakir as well if we would not have succeeded.(KIENGIR (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporated? 

message: The article states that :File:Ludvik1Uhersko.jpg depicts the birth of Louis. The categories on the Commons file suggest that the file depicts his wife and daughters, which would conflict with it being a depiction of his birth. Can one of these be corrected? Pinging Borsoka. Surtsicna (talk) 11:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture from the Illuminated Chronicle depicts Louis's birth. Thank you for your message. I deleted the wrong categories. Borsoka (talk) 11:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis I's birth image 

message: why do you think that the article about King Louis the Great should mention that Louis granted possessions to Lackfi? As Louis granted possessions to many peoples, the emphasis on his grant to Lackfi contradicts WP:DUE. Borsoka (talk) 01:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lords of Međimurje