Talk:Major

message: In the article, the entry for golf major currently reads:
*A major in golf is one of the four or five most important yearly tournaments. In the United States, the PGA TOUR and LPGA tour have four majors, while the Champions Tour for golfers 50 and over has five. All other top-level men's tours worldwide recognize the same four majors as the PGA TOUR. The LPGA Tour for women also has four majors.
I suggest that this is too much explanation of details for a disambiguation page. I feel the disambiguation page should only contain info useful for directing your request, not info about the topic.  Differentiating ideas, not trivia.  In that spirit, i would edit thusly:
*A major in golf is one of the set of most important yearly tournaments.  In the United States, the PGA Tour, the LPGA tour and the Champions Tour have their own set of majors.
I feel this helps the reader because it suggests that if you've heard the word major as well as any of those other words near it, this is your link.  However, it doesn't tell us the number, location, or the offical rules surrounding them.  If we want to know this, we simply click on the link for Majors, or any of the particular golfing leagues.  More concise, i feel.
Please comment. – Fudoreaper 09:44, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, shorter is better, less to maintain. In fact, I prefer not to have links in the text except for the one actually being disambiguated, they don't really serve any purpose, but it's almost impossible to keep mindless link-adders from putting them back if you de-link. Stan 12:23, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting you talk about additional links their foolish purpose.  see  - a dab page i edited a bit, but was cleaned up to wikipedia style.  Perhaps this page should be changed to follow that format. — Fudoreaper 19:50, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Shorter, but not accurate. The men's majors are not endorsed solely by the PGA Tour and they aren't all in the States. Scranchuse 03:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorten golf majors? 

message: What do these two sessions by one editor comprehend? Compare versions is almost useless ... here is what I can make of "compare versions" using two windows:
#group the first seven entries as "Other" and relegates them to the bottom (6);
#relegate heading "Sport" to the bottom (5);
##group some sporting entries as subheading "Other sports" and relegate them to the bottom of heading "Sports" (5.3)
##group others under Tennis, to the bottom (5.2)
##group others under Golf (5.1) 
###add many golf listings
###subdivide golf listings men (5.1.1) and women (5.1.2)
##cut a lot of sporting talk
#dislocate the TOContents
(That numbering isn't what I hoped.)
What of it? The first and last are unwelcome. Much of the middle ("Sport") is welcome but the addition of golf listings is not --instead we should have a list of major golf tournaments that includes all the historical "majors"; formal subheadings for Men and Women in golf may be overkill. --P64 (talk) 19:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest revisions -05-26 an -06-02 

message: These names of the stellar constellations also known as Big Dipper (Ursa Major) and Little Dipper will be familiar to many readers. I don't know how to fit it in but note that I visited because I was surprised to see maior not major in the preface as Latin, so that may be the place for it. --P64 (talk) 21:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ursa Major, ursa minor 

message: See Talk: Minor#Disambiguation of minor and major which may suggest improvements here. It's out of date because I revised both pages next day, but the most visible changes (which the discussion concerns) are there to make the arrangement of disambig Minor more like this one. 
Here I changed the nature and location of Wiktionary links and location of the Contents box, along with substantial revisions. Yet the table of contents remains as I illustrated in that linked Talk. --P64 (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation of minor and major 

message: I'm looking at this list, which should be things that reasonable readers would look up the term Major, to find something that is often called simply "Major" or "Majors." There's a bit of trivial bloat here, and perhaps things that should not be.
Wikipedia:Disambiguation tells us:
*this is not a search index.
*Do not add a link that merely contains part of the page title.
*We reasonably expect to see Abraham Lincoln at Lincoln (disambiguation), but very few sources would refer to the waltz composer Harry J. Lincoln by an unqualified "Lincoln".
Then I see someone add under people, Klaus Heuser (born 1957), German rock guitarist and producer. This guy has a nickname of Major and it is almost always used as a first name or Major Heuser. He is not universally known as "Major" and should not be on this list as far as I can tell.
In looking I can see no reason why another entry should be here...Matt Sanchez (born 1970), American journalist and former porn star, known in the latter field by the stage name "Rod Majors". These are not search indexes for everyone with a first or last name of Major or Majors. This is to help readers find very specific articles that would likely be called only "Major/Majors". I think this should be fixed. I didn't take it to a full RfC because I wanted to gauge others thoughts first. I was talking about this with a fellow editor on my talk page, but wasn't really satisfied. Thoughts? Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference  "Der "Major" rockt wieder - Ex-BAP-Gitarrist in Brühl"  in Klaus Heuser seems to justify having a redirect Major (German musician) (or perhaps The Major (German musician)), and an entry in the dab page for that name. If you disagree, then WP:RfD would be the place to discuss.  I've tidied up about Matt Sanchez/Rod Majors, adding him to the Major (surname) page and clarifying that it includes the surname "Majors" as it already has several of that name listed.  Looking at Marshall Taylor I wonder if that page ought to be moved to Major Taylor, as it's the name used in most of the sources (and eg "Major Taylor Association" etc.) Probably doesn't really belong on this page but on Major (given name), though perhaps that page would need to be clarified to say whether or  not it includes nicknames. Gets more complicated the further you look! PamD 10:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've had a go at cleaning up the page per MOS:DAB and WP:LONGDAB, cutting out a few entries not known simply as Major (etc.).  Pam, I have move the 3 nicknames to the given name page - do you think it's ok? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that "mononyms" go on the main dab page, so have replaced the two musicians. Not sure about removing all the military ranks, though I suppose they are clearly listed in Major, so that no-one would come to the dab page because they'd have found them there first. Will be interesting to see whether they reappear at some point! PamD 14:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Two things. 1) Why should we be using a non-exact link to an article? I'm not familiar with the mononym requirement for dab pages when at all other times we are supposed to be linking to the exact page name. 2) Klaus Heuser is pretty much an example by Wikipedia:Disambiguation of what not to include here. He is rarely called simply "Major" by sourcing, and even those are usually because he uses it as a first name. He is covered under the Major (given name), including people with the nickname section. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "rarely" but not "never": if the name is used for him, then it gets a redirect or, if the name isn't unique, a dab page entry. Perhaps the dab page entry should be unlinked with the real name linked later in the entry, but if he's sometimes known as "Major" or "The Major" (and we have a ref which is evidence for this), then he gets an entry in the dab page, as I understand things. PamD 19:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you don't think the redirect from Major (German musician) should exist then take it to WP:RfD. If it exists, then there should be an entry for him on this dab page. PamD 19:19, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is absolutely against Wikipedia:Disambiguation. We do not include every single instance of something on a dab page. Did you read what I quoted above? Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Take it easy – you asked for thoughts from other editors, and you got some. Opinions often differ and interpretations of guidance are often different. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And I do want input. However per Wikipedia:Disambiguation, just because something exists doesn't make it dab worthy. It might be by consensus but it is not automatic. Another thing we have been told by consensus and administrators (especially when making "good" articles, is that "IF" it is included, the link should be directly to the article name... not to a redirect. It can show "Major (German musician)" but it should always link to "Klaus Heuser", not to the redirect. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:41, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to include in this article 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 00:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 00:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 18:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress