Talk:Zero emission

message: (Section title added by 137.205.192.27 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I will try to rewrite it. Also, I added a small title section to your comment for future readability of the page. 137.205.192.27 21:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't it be "no ''harmful'' by-products"? 

message: I added some information on emissions associated with various forms of current electricity production and added a section for future technology ( such as fusion and CCS ). I suggest we keep the sections of currently widely deployed technologies separate from the ones in the research phase, as it makes it easier to compare the various technologies in an NPOV manner. I realise that the distinction is not always going to be perfectly clear, so some common sense will have to used (ominous phrase, I know). 137.205.192.27 21:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separating existing and future technology

message: Biofuel and vegetable fuels should be all removed, since they generate fumes and emissions. Whether or not this would generate 'no net emissions' is irrelevant (and also false, it still generates quite a huge amount of emissions).
:How is it false?  Don't you agree that the CO2 released when you burn vegetable oil first was taken out of the air by some plant?  And why would this be irrelevant?  If all fuel came from vegetable oil we would not increase the CO2 in the atmosphere.  Vincecate 14:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing vegetable fuel and biofuel from zero-emission claim 

message: I think zero carbon now supports the zero emission methodology. Perhaps it could be mentioned in the article.
Link:
Zero Carbon Now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.201.143 (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zero Carbon as environmental org supporting the zero-emission methodology 

message: Perhaps it is best to mark the articles with the technologies described with the "Zero emission transport" and "Zero emission large scale energy production" categories. Tell me what you think
Thanks,
81.241.167.60 14:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zero emission transport and zero emission large scale energy production categories 

message: Provided hyper link to carbon dioxide Greenopedia (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential user technologies 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Zero emission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110710184909/http://enduser.elsevier.com/zeroemissions to http://enduser.elsevier.com/zeroemissions
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Climate change as a result of greenhouse gasses is widely believed, but the degree is not known.  Since there is no consensus among scientists as to the certainty that nor degree to which combustion engines contribute to climate change, I have added the phrase 'are believed to' to the first sentence in the 'Zero emission engines' section.
Saibot942 (talk) 14:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is widely known and there is consensus among scientists to the certainty of increased man-made greenhouse gases intensifying the greenhouse effect that causes global climate changes. Of 19 (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: climate change