Talk:Maya Gold

message: This article about Maya Gold (porn actress) is intended to inform porn-fans about her sex-work in porn films.  Many porn-fans have specialized interests in the kind of sex acts they want to see. And when they see an attractive porn actress, they often want to know if she caters to their sex-interests before buying or renting her films.
This is not a biographical article.  But biographical information about Maya Gold would be a welcome addition.
: Granted, but the article needed to be rewritten in order to fall in with the Manual of Style for biographies. (Wikipedia is not a promotional tool for porn stars, no more than the Encyclopedia Brittanica.) Furthermore, the actress has not gained sufficient notability in her field and as Wikipedia is not a biographical listing of all persons, I have nominated the article for deletion.  My edits are not an act of vandalism and an AFD can go either way.  All an AFD determines is whether or not people believe that an article should be included in Wikipedia. If you have any more questions, please feel free to reply to them here and please do not remove the AFD notice.  When the vote is over, the AFD notice will be removed as per the guidelines. Thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 09:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is appearing in 50 pornos not notable?  That's quite a large number of major titles for a porn star.  Most female porn stars appear in less than 10.  Its the males that get the huge numbers.  To have a girl appear in that kind of number is pretty notable. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 15:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The adult film industry cranks out hundreds of titles a month -- and many films are, in fact, assembled using clips from already released material. So, really, 50 is not noteworthy... Just ask any expert in the field.  The "average" porn actress makes roughly this (or less), then disappears into obscurity. Also, the number of male porn stars is far less than female porn stars, simply because it is harder to find male porn stars who can "act" on demand -- women are more flexible in this case. (So, yes, males get the huge numbers -- only because of basic human reproductive biology.) -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 21:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm afraid that you're making an incorrect correlation between mass deletion and mass censorship.  The two are not directly related and this is a very weak argument for keeping an article.  Yes, those articles should be looked into to see whether or not they are worthy of inclusion in Wikipeda -- however, I would recommend reading (and understanding) the policy Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information -- I am referring directly to point #6. (Also, when linking to articles within Wikipedia, you can just use the brackets --  and , with the article name contained within the brackets.) Thanks for your concerns -- and if you have any more questions, comments, or concerns, let 'em fly. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 21:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Maya Gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124032148/http://www.blikk.hu/cikk.php?cikk=28563 to http://www.blikk.hu/cikk.php?cikk=28563
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929001510/http://machomedia.hu/archives/2005/12/maya_gold_maya/ to http://machomedia.hu/archives/2005/12/maya_gold_maya/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This came up for review because of removal of a redirect.  The redirect was silly, it went to a mention of a chocolate bar which had the same name. I think that wp:notability is borderline but not to an AFD trip extent and I marked it as reviewed.  Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes from January 2022 New Page Patrol Review