Talk:Lake Toba

message: I'm sorry but is this relevant to the page?
It seems more like a propaganda of some sort [Unsigned]
: If by "this" you mean the first topic on this talk page: You'll notice they didn't attempt to insert it into the article, did they? Seems to me mentioning it in Talk is entirely appropriate! GeorgeTSLC (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant? 

message: The Toba catastrophe theory is linked to as the "main article" in the eruption section. The problem is that that article isn't really about the eruption but the theory of the eruption's impact on the development of man. As such, the article should be mentioned, but not as the main article with respect to that section. -Harmil 07:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and made the change. -Harmil 07:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Specific claims of the Toba catastrophe theory, e.g. that the eruption triggered the last glaciation event or that it wiped-out out human populations world-wide, should be removed from this article about Lake Toba.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:32D4:6240:34BA:6958:223:457F (talk) 13:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toba catastrophe theory 

message: "toba" is Spanish for tuff.
I suspect it is a coincidence, but what is the Indonesian meaning? --84.20.17.84 13:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 

message: Somebody has stated that this (Young Toba eruption) is the biggest in the last in the last 2 million years. I have looked for bigger eruptions futher back and so far no eruption has surpassed it since around 27 million years ago so doesn't that make it the biggest volcanic eruption in the last 25 million years? Wiki235 16:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2 mya statement may have come from the Volcano World page cited in the following paragraph (which incidentally has a horribly misleading size graphic). I'd agree with your statement if we restrict it to explosive eruptions; the Columbia River Basalt Group which erupted from 17 to 6 million years ago is much larger, and there could have been individual eruptions within it that were larger than Toba. Toba is the largest explosive eruption listed by Mason, Pyle and Oppenheimer (2004 - citation below) since 27-28 million years ago. If no one objects, I'll change our article accordingly. -- Avenue 02:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Well seeing as no explosive eruption since La Garita has surpassed Toba I'll put that in. Wiki235 13:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest for how long 

message: It would be good to make it clear, in the infobox, whether the surface area includes or excludes Samosir, e.g. "area = 1,130 km² (excluding Pulau Samosir)". --Chriswaterguy talk 20:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  surface area 

message: "scientists believe might have wiped out much of civilization."
As far as we know, there were no civilizations 75,000 years ago.  I'm being WP:BOLD and changing it to "much of humanity"; if this is wrong for some reason or you have a better wording, please change it. Vultur (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  civilization? 

message: I asked this a year ago but there's been no explanation or correction, so I will ask it again-Why is one of the photographs in the article captioned 'Lake Toba from the island of Prapat?' The maps I see show Prapat being on the periphery of the lake, not an island? Deedeebee (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Parapat is not an island but a town along the lake. This probably came from a bad translation as the Indonesian Pulau can mean either Island or town/district. I don't know which photograph you are talking about, but don't hesitate to correct. --Madlozoz (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Island of Prapat

message: I've changed the line in the lead paragraph from "it is the site of a supervolcanic eruption that occurred 75,000 years before the present" to "...that occurred 74,000 years before the present", as this is what the sources used in the article agree on  Dom Kaos (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of eruption

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
kanker
92.70.169.90 (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Look I'm sick of people changing this page, stating that this eruption was the largest of any kind anywhere in the last 25 million years. It wasn't. The Columbia River Basalt Group which began around 14 MYA and lasted up until 6 MYA were far, far larger than Lake Toba. If we restrict the statement to explosive eruptions then it's fine, but in it's present state it's not. I'll change it to explosive eruptions, if you want to change it back and have proof that this eruption exceeded the 174,300 km³ erupted by the Columbia River Basalt Group i.e. an article by a geologist which states this eruption exceeds VEI 8 and is infact the VEI 10 it would need to be to support the statement, then please provide the evidence. If you don't understand, either leave me a message or talk to one of the senior members of WikiProject Volcanoes. Thank you. Wiki235 (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The size of the eruption in comparison to others

message: The two words in the lead, "largely debated", caught my eye. The article reads, "According to the Toba catastrophe theory to which some anthropologists and archeologists subscribe, it had global consequences, killing most humans then alive and creating a population bottleneck in Central Eastern Africa and India that affected the genetic inheritance of all humans today.[5] This theory however, has been largely debated as there is no evidence for any other animal decline or extinction, even in environmentally sensitive species.[6]" But what % of anthropologists and archeologists subscribe to this theory? It sounds like it could be a minority view. The source for the last sentence concludes "We conclude that it is unlikely that the Toba super-eruption caused a human, animal or plant population bottleneck." I don't think "largely debated" tells us much about what mainstream scholars think. Jesanj (talk) 00:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps "largely contested" is an accurate description? Anyone know? Jesanj (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still being discussed and is taken seriously by scientists, but with much more skepticism than before. First, humans have low genetic diversity, with an "effective population size" of 10,000 (compared with chimps at 20,000). That means our genetic diversity could theoretically be accounted for by 10,000 ancestors. However, that's just a theoretical minimum. The actual number could be higher by quite a few orders of magnitude. (Local Extinction and Recolonization, Species Effective Population Size, and Modern Human Origins) Next, a sediment core from Lake Malawi indicates that temperatures in East Africa only declined by about 1 degree C for about 1 year (they found confirmed Toba ash in the sediment), that Toba triggered a drought, but no disruption of the ecosystem. (Subdecadal phytolith and charcoal records from Lake Malawi, East Africa imply minimal effects on human evolution from the ∼74 ka Toba supereruption) In southern India, they've found stone tools above and below the 1-meter air-fall layer (i.e., ash that was undisturbed by wind or rain). Most of the tools below the layer are Lower Paleolithic while those above are Middle Paleolithic. At the time, anatomically modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans were all using Middle Paleolithic tools, so some sort of Homo erectus probably became extinct. However, in some locations they found Middle Paleolithic tools both above and below, and in the same style, indicating somebody survived. They've also found evidence of mammals in the area not having been disrupted, as at the Billasurgam caves. (Discovery of Youngest Toba Tuff localities in the Sagileru Valley, south India, in association with Palaeolithic industries) Zyxwv99 (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largely debated" 

message: The photo named Ambarita2.jpg has an error in editing. This image was created from a set of overlapping images and there is an error in the middle of the photo. There's a large section that is duplicated, as if the two images were pasted together in the wrong place. I did a tentative correction eliminating the redundant pixels that resulted in an image 4254 pixels wide vs. the 5208 pixels of the image as posted here. Vhilden (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in photo editing 

message: This sentence contains a conversion error: 
'It has been accepted that the eruption of Toba led to a volcanic winter with a worldwide decrease in temperature between 3 to 5 °C (5.4 to 9.0 °F), and up to 15 °C (27 °F) in higher latitudes.'
15 °C is 59 °F  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.215.153.86 (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No it isn't, not as a temperature difference as seems to be the intent here... 110.23.118.21 (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion error 

message: "This study support by Lane and Zielinski. Lane and Zielinski studied the lake-core from Africa and GISP2. Lane had prove that no volcanic winter after Toba eruption, and Zielinski prove that high H2SO4 deposit does not cause long-term effect.[15][16]"
Can a native speaker correct this? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.130.153.43 (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor english language 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lake Toba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080113051422/http://www.semp.us/publications/biot_reader.php?BiotID=164 to http://www.semp.us/publications/biot_reader.php?BiotID=164
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080813012857/http://www.indonesianmusic.com/batak.htm to http://www.indonesianmusic.com/batak.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303224151/http://www.ilec.or.jp/database/asi/asi-10.html to http://www.ilec.or.jp/database/asi/asi-10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is average depth really 500 m? How was this calculated? With a maximum depth of 505 m this would indicate a prism/cylindrical shape more perfect than your average kitchen pot, fairly unlikely for a volcanic lake. Dividing volume 240 km3 by surface 1130 km2 we get a much more realistic (for your average vaguely inverted-cone-shaped volcanic caldera) 210 m average depth. 93.142.85.96 (talk) 00:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average depth 

message: Per Sinking_of_MV_Sinar_Bangun#22_June, the lake apparently turned out to be much deeper than previously thought. So the max. depth of 505 m given here seems to be outdated. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth 

message: Please, correct the intro. The country the lake is located in wasn't even specified in the first sentence. I have corrected it now, but it's still a mess. Should the first sentence talk about the calderra of a supervolcano? Can't the location be summarised at the beginning, and the geological nature be followed up on later?--Adûnâi (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The intro should be corrected 

message: I suggest that The Origin of Lake Toba does not seem sufficiently notable for a standalone article but if it can be better sourced would be a useful addition to the article on the Lake, so that stub should be merged into this article. PamD 16:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[The Origin of Lake Toba]]