lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National Board of Review

message: My impression from reading in Lee Grieveson' Policing Cinema is that the early National Board of Review (then called the National Board of Censorship) was a means to censor films, not protect them from government censorship.  Does anyone have further insight into whether the first paragraph is overly rosey about the Board's early history?--Nleamy 20:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first paragraph has changed a bit since then, but I thought I wouldn't leave this unanswered. Censorship boards tend to pass their costs unto the studios and can demand painful arbitrary last minute changes to film. Especially when this was created, they were around so that the censorship board was national and under the control of the studios, instead of the government. (Worse case scenario, every city sets up its own censorship board, and you have to make one badly chopped piece for the nation (or most of it), or separate edits for each city.) Until the 1952 decision Joseph Burstyn, Inc v. Wilson, film wasn't protected by the First Amendment in the US, and any legislative body could have meddled with the film. This board certainly censored films, but it was created to avoid government censorship, not for artistic or moral reasons, but simple financial ones.--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Added info from an article regarding the board's name change to remove the word "censorship". The rest of the first paragraph on the Board's creation is consistent with the article, although the Board was not the main subject of it. Deanlaw (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://nationalboardofreview.org/about/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  QueenofHearts 12:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bangu Atlético Clube

message: Can we recognize the 1967 Copa Minas as a Brazilian Serie A title? Corey Warburton (talk) 00:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  /// 

message: i just realized that only the 1920 Paulistano team deserves to be recognized as Brazilian Champions.
In 1967 there were two national tournaments recognized by CBF as a Brazilian Championship, the Taca Brasil and Torneio Roberto Gomes Pedrosa (both won by Palmeiras) Corey Warburton (talk) 00:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just realized
Talk:FK Borac Banja Luka

message: Any way the emblem can be updated to the correct one?
The official website has the most up to date one: https://fkborac.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Borac-logo-vektor-01.png
(Notice how БАЊА ЛУКА is written) BojanRBL (talk) 07:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emblem/Logo Update
Talk:Botafogo Futebol Clube (SP)

message: Desculpe a mudança radical que fiz. Achei as informações sobre o Botafogo SP muito aquem do que ele representou no passado, apesar de ainda estar em atividade. Peço que deixe as alterações que fiz e corrija apenas erros no ingles.
Sorry I made a radical change. I found the information about the SP Botafogo far short of what he represented in the past, though still active. I ask you to let the changes I made and correct errors in English only.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbarrau (talk • contribs) 01:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Eu não acho que esta idéia seja viável. A maior parte do texto teria que ser reescrito. É melhor mover o texto para esta página de discussão, e gradualmente traduzí-lo. --Carioca (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

text: This idea is not feasible. Most of the text need to be rewritten. It is better to move the text to this discussion page, and gradually translate it. --Carioca (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

text: O texto parece ter sido traduzido por máquina. Além do mais as categorias e templates estão quebrados, já que a Wikipedia em inglês não usa os mesmos da Wikipédia em português. --Carioca (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

text: The text looks like a machine translation. Besides that, the categories and templates are broken, because the English Wikipedia does not use the same ones as the Portuguese Wikipedia. --Carioca (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Eu verei o que posso fazer. Eu pretendo manter o texto, mas fazer estas correções. --Carioca (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

text: I will see what I can do. I will try to keep the text, but improve it. --Carioca (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Estou feliz que você tenha gostado! Abraços, --Carioca (talk) 19:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

text: I am glad you liked it. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 19:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

text: OK. --Carioca (talk) 20:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Carioca. Gostaria que desse uma olhada no artigo do Botafogo em português e se puder, acrescente as novas informações no artigo em inglês. Abraço.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbarrau (talk • contribs) 22:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New info
Talk:Monkey (band)

message: A "yes" vote. Also agree with merge direction, as the (ska band) version is mostly a list and would be easier to merge if added at the end of the (band) article. --Emana 00:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Monkey (ska band)]] 

message: Under discography, is "albums" supposed to be a subtitle?
Also is "Monkey" supposed to be all caps or not? It would need to be fixed in a few areas if this is not the case or is.--KyleM15 (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A few Questions

message: while i couldnt find any more references, they are as far as i can tell notable, and so i trimmed the article to what could be referenced if someone were to put in serious effort. i think it flies as a WP article now. took out pov language, etc. if i have stepped on any toes, esp. band members, i apologize, but remember, WP is not a free webhosting service, and i really believe that plain, well written articles reflect better on artists than promotional ones here (aside from being verboten). and now i may actually go hear them. i miss the freaky executives...Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: Why is the top section in bold, my friends?  kc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.232.95 (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  bold
Talk:Club Bolívar

message: I've been living in Bolivia for 22 of my 23 years on earth and I never heard of such thing applying to Bolivar, in any case the only team officially claiming that is Boca Juniors, so until further proof I'm deleting that part Jso 1985 (talk) 02:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mitad mas uno?
Talk:Dave the Barbarian (character)

message: Can someone give me a link that verifies the Lizzie/kim commercials? I've never seen them and can find no information on them at all. Otherwise these are unsourced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PHDrillSergeant (talk • contribs) 15:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where?

message: Dave the barbarian is actually on Disney channel at 5:00. This show is very good and extremely educational.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.28.204 (talk) 20:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dave the barbarian
Talk:Monstrosity (band)

message: Yeah, whoever inserted the Redwall reference for Origin, lol.  Nice try...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.134.187 (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Motional Feedback

message: The article currently only talks about Philips, however the Onkyo article mentions this technology in the 60's. John Vandenberg 02:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onkyo 

message: Panasonic produced a motional feedback amp/speaker system in the late 1960s. The manual for the Model MF-800 and companion EASB-8M2 speakers may be found here:
http://www.proaudiodesignforum.com/forum/php/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=707  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.71.167 (talk) 21:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panasonic
Talk:Guangya

message: I've just added some data about Chinese dictionaries from this excellent source: 古代漢語課程介紹
Keahapana 21:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese reference 

message: The page incorrectly listed a Northern Wei link after the authorship of Guangya but gave dates which correspond to the Kingdom of Wei (220-265 CE) (i.e., Three Kingdoms period, 220-280 CE), not the Northern Wei. I assume an earlier contributor had confused Wei with N. Wei (386-534). I have thus changed the N. Wei link to Three Kingdoms. If anyone knows for sure that Zhang Yi was from the Wei Kingdom specifically, pls. feel free to change it to 'Wei'; I'm not sure and so have gone with the more conservative choice, 'Three Kingdoms' period. Dragonbones (talk) 08:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reasons for changes
Talk:Moods for Moderns

message: This lengthy section has no references. Where did this information come from? --Beefyt (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove section 
Talk:Donald Duck filmography

message: Not all the cartoons mentioned on the list are actual Donald shorts, most of those made in the late 50's and perhaps all made in the 60's are actually educational cartoons featuring Donald Duck. It should also be mentioned that some of the cartoons were not solo cartoons, but a segment in animated features, for instance Lake Titicaca, which was a part of the movie Saludos Amigos. 84.48.35.203 (talk) 10:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs some clean up

message: Are the red links meant to be there. 82.46.93.158 (talk) 20:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So it seems.  Those link to articles that editors believe should and will be written. —SlamDiego←T 08:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

text: There have been more red-linked entries than blue-linked entries, and editors have been coming-along to red-link still others.  Since articles have not been written in a timely manner, I have removed the wikifications.  The entries can be re-wikified when there are actual articles. —SlamDiego←T 08:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links 

message: Hello there I was wondering when will the rest of the Donald Duck cartoon short plots be completed? Is there a professional way of typing in the Donald Duck plots? Because I've watched the Donald Duck cartoons and I know about them very well. I won't be uploading Donald Duck images on Wikipedia because they're still copyrighted by the Disney company. But I'll do my best to type the rest of the Donald Duck Cartoon shorts. I'll try to keep it to a neutral point of view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrosswalkX (talk • contribs) 23:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  When will the Donald Duck shorts on wikipedia be completed?
Talk:Colo Colo de Futebol e Regatas

message: if you want to add the logo, here's the link:CCFR logo 189.77.143.24 (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Moonbabies (band)

message: Reads like an ad for the band.  Offending sentences include, "The Single/Mini-album War on Sound was released in 2005 and became an immediate indie-anthem", and "developed into more sophisticated pop music".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.147.20.229 (talk) 10:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Stratton Mills

message: What does this statement actually mean "He is the only Member of Parliament (MP) yet to sit for the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland in the British House of Commons." Could it be clarified? (Couter-revolutionary 21:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps - in what way is it unclear?  No other MP has yet sat in the British House of Commons for APNI.  It seems pretty straightforward to me, but if you can clarify it, go ahead. Warofdreams talk 11:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Esporte Clube Tigres do Brasil

message: I need a written source, but the current talk is that Tigres has been sold and closed. Their official website is closed, also. Moro-no-lixo (talk) 04:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for letting me know. Yes, we need a written source for that. I could not find a source yet. --Carioca (talk) 19:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Still kicking at the second state division, it seems: http://186.202.17.33/clubes/serie-b/e-c-tigres-do-brasil.html (It's the Rio state federation website, I don't know why I got an IP address for that). Moro-no-lixo (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. Thanks. --Carioca (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Esporte Clube Vitória

message: Vitoria was runner-up in Serie c 2006 Corey Warburton (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  add info
Talk:Theodore Millon

message: why isn't this categorised under psychology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.179.230 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: considering his variants are named in almost every personality disorder article. 
His website has a biography: http://www.millon.net/content/tm_bio.htm. MichaelExe (talk) 20:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes this article is bad for such a major figure. It should have better biographical info. Yes If i am going to include his variants here at all, i ought to do them for all PDs. Do you agree ? Actually i think it best to provide direct links to the relevant sections in all the PD articles. Incidentally I am getting my ass kicked in the Psychopathy article - dunno if you want to get involved ?--Penbat (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: At the end of the article there's an assertion his subtypes are 'widely acknowledged' but the citations are to his own website! I was looking for verification of his notability. I thought of taking the phrase 'widely acknowledged' out until anyone with references fancies putting it in but wasn't sure if that was the right thing to do? I don't know the appropriate Template and not sure I want to search. I find the whole body of work and consistently also any references to it very stuffy over-blown and sort-of offensive - I find myself unable read it closely! I was suspicious when I naively first stumbled into the references in the personality disorder article. His bio is here: shttp://www.millon.net/content/tm_bio.htm  Kathybramley (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This Needs a Lot of Work

message: Dude was a hack/pseudoscience propagator/professional pigeonholer/in-the-flesh phenomenological scourge. Article needs a section on counter-arguments tbf. Yes I’m biased, but so is this article. It’s obvious I’m ill-suited to edit, so this serves as more of an emphatic request for someone impartial to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:1940:900:812A:4458:F731:E3CA (talk) 22:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Theodore Millon: sufferer of NPD?
Talk:FK Olimpik

message: According to thesehttp://sportsport.ba/bh_fudbal/olimpic-dobio-novog-predsjednika-mijenja-ime-i-boje-kluba/217652http://sportske.ba/igra-slovima-premijerligas-ponovo-mijenja-ime/http://www.bljesak.info/rubrika/sport/clanak/olimpic-mijenja-ime-u-olimpik/179894 sites, the name will switch back to "FK Olimpik Sarajevo". Azrail Kabir (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversing name change

message: As of the session 2010/11 the official name of the club has been changed from "FK Olimpik Sarajevo" to "FK Olimpic Sarajevo". For the proof, you can use the first reference (the official site of the Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina) or the Bosnian Wikipedia site for FK Olimpic. The crest although hasn't been changed yet, since the change of the name happened by incident (while entering the club in the registrar, someone entered the name wrong, but the name is again used the second session). AnelZukic (talk) 13:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing the name
Talk:FK Sloboda Tuzla

message: https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1044682_722099357803049_1183702347_n.jpg
This is official club logo, I don't know how to upload it so I leave it to administrators.
Source: http://www.fksloboda.ba/vijesti/651-poela-prodaja-klupskih-suvenira
(club's official website)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.175.123.123 (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official club logo 
Talk:José Carioca

message: Is it certain Pedrão is a human? Isn't he an anthropomorph dog, like other Disney characters? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 12:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedrão
Talk:Grêmio Esportivo Brasil

message: This image has been marked with a watermark flag. With this particular image, it would be useful to clarify what precisely needs to be removed. There is a url on the bottom, some text on the left, text on the top, a border, a ribbon, etc. What belongs and what does not? JBarta (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image: [[:Image:Regis_e_Milar.jpg|Official Trikot of Grêmio Esportivo Brasil]]
Talk:Lil Bad Wolf

message: Isn't the correct name "Li'l", instead of "Lil"? 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 09:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Li'l or Lil?

message: An earlier version of this article included a beautiful picture of Wolfie. Not there anymore, alas. Please let's put a picture back in. Das Baz, aka Erudil 19:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please let us include a picture
Talk:Clara Cluck

message: Wikipedia needs a Clara Cluck page, but this cartoon character biography is almost a direct ripoff of the Clara page at Don Markstein's Toonopedia: http://www.toonopedia.com/cluck.htm -- and what isn't stolen from there is taken from Rich Bellacera's Hoozoo: http://users.cwnet.com/xephyr/rich/dzone/hoozoo/clara.html
These existing pages are copyrighted by their owners. We shouldn't tolerate plagiarism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ramapith (talk • contribs) 01:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed: this sentence for instance is the same: "Clara was a chicken, as far as her general body type went, but not a scrawny-looking wattle like Gyro Gearloose or Super Chicken." (added here). Copyvio tag added. Herve661 (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toonopedia/Hoozoo plagiarism
Talk:Humphrey the Bear

message: :Humphrey's foil is usually Donald Duck; otherwise it is the officious park ranger, voiced by Bill Thompson in his familiar milquetoast characterization.
... what does that mean?  Milquetoast = timid?  Audobon is anything but timid but despite his rotund figure quite bossy towards the dangerous bears. Maikel (talk) 16:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that statement. Maikel (talk) 11:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Milquetoast

message: The article lists Humphrey's first appearance as the Goofy short "Hold That Pose". While that short does indeed feature a bear, I see little resemblance between that bear and Humphrey. It lives in a zoo, not a national park. It's not drawn the same as Humphrey, and it exhibits none of his classic mannerisms. The short in question can be viewed on Youtube for anyone curious to compare. I've seen other sites which also list "Hold That Pose" as his first appearance, but unless  there's been some sort of official confirmation from Disney that the bear in that short is indeed supposed to be Humphrey, then I believe that the 1953 Donald Duck cartoon "Rugged Bear" should be listed as Humphrey's actual first appearance. Highlander 77 (talk) 02:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First Appearance
Talk:Fairy with Turquoise Hair

message: Eurocultural?  why not just the widespread belief? OneWorld22 01:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: about beatings

message: That is not accurate. The Blue Fairy in the book has azure hair, a shade of bright blue with no green in it. How do I change the header so it is correct? The Red Queen (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turquioise Hair???
Talk:Londrina Esporte Clube

message: Hi, I'm working on the Londrina article at the moment. As most of the source material will from Brazilian websites I'll be trying my best to translate them into English. I don't speak Portuguese myself and I'm mostly using Google Translate to interpret my sources. If I do make any translation errors, please let me know.
Thanks!!! DarthJoeyJoJo (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation from Portuguese
Talk:Princess Eilonwy

message: I added a reference to her non-status as a Disney Princess in the marketing franchise despite her status as a princess in an animated Disney film, with a link to the eponymous wiki page. I believe this is an important piece of information to people trying to list the members of this franchise. Sings-With-Spirits (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as a Disney Princess 

message: Please update this as it is wrong. I have Welsh relatives dating back 50 years and more with this name. So, he didn't invent it al all.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.10.174 (talk) 07:23, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
:I moved the preceding comment from the article to here. Other IPs have mentioned similar in the past, I think. Of course, it could be the same person, but, thought it was worth putting here for discussion. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name dispute
Talk:J. Audubon Woodlore

message: ... on a much-neglected character. Any chances of an image of Ranger J.? Maikel (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On second sight I had to fix quite a few mistakes.  But I was standing on the shoulders of giants! Maikel (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On third sight about every information in this article doesn't check out.  I've uploaded an image, BTW. Maikel (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: <strike>Excellent article</strike>