Talk:Names of the Irish state

message: You only have to look at Google News pretty much any day of the week! --Red King 12:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course its idleness, and arguably incompetence.  That was precisely my point.  Without the footnote, the article is being too precious.  Yes, their are certainly cases where "Eire" (sic) and Ulster are used with malice aforethought.  But the vast majority of cases are innocent, alebit culpably so.  I have been asked a few times "Are you from southern Ireland", which I take as meaning "Aroo from Cork?" before realising the question meant "not Northern Ireland".  The questioner had never heard of Southern Ireland. --Red King 22:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eire and Ulster in newspaper headlines

message: For an informal merger discussion see Wikipedia_talk:Irish_Wikipedians%27_notice_board#Names_of_Ireland.
Djegan 20:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names of Ireland

message: :Image:Cropped euro coin.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cropped euro coin.png

message: :Image:Cropped euro coin.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cropped euro coin.png

message: The name of the State is Éire, or, in the English language, Ireland
So the name of the state is "Ireland" in the English language but "Éire" in every other language ? 2.127.208.169 (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article 4 another interpretation ?

message: This should be Republic of Ireland (name) or something similar as thats what it deals with -- Republic of Ireland. Djegan (talk) 17:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it shouldn't.  The name of the state is Ireland.  'Republic of' is a description to put beyond doubt that it is not subject to the Crown (of England). Please read Republic of Ireland Act. --Red King (talk) 22:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was at Names of the Irish state before a couple of moves which can only be undone by an administrator --Rumping (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been moved back to :Names of the Irish state, but not the Talk: page; probably just an oversight. jnestorius(talk) 11:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: The image :Image:Ireland48cstamp.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationale added but source needed. Original uploader is retired. ww2censor (talk) 04:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Ireland48cstamp.jpg

message: Originally, the last section covered colloquial terms used by Irish people for their country - that is, what they actually call themselves in real life.  This was a very important section, because it emphasised that the naming controversy discussed above is largely irrelevant to ordinary Irish people. Now someone has inserted a lot of quotes from the style guides of British newspapers.  How are these relevant to this important section? Michael of Lucan (talk) 10:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Colloquial names

message: Of the following group of entries, only the first is a reasonable contender for the title "Ireland":
* Republic of Ireland, internationally recognized state since 1937 
* Northern Ireland
The island has formerly been subject to a number of political arrangements (arranged in reverse chronological order):
* Irish Free State, the name, from 1922 to 1937, of the state comprising 26 of Ireland's 32 counties
* Irish Republic, the unilaterally declared independent state between 1919 and 1922, also sometimes wrongly used to describe the current state
* Southern Ireland, the 26-county Irish state envisaged by the Government of Ireland Act 1920
* United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the name of the state of which Ireland formed a part between 1801 and 1922
* Kingdom of Ireland, the name given to the Irish state from 1541 to 1801.
* Lordship of Ireland, a nominally all-island Irish state created in the wake of the Norman invasion of the east coast of Ireland in 1169
* Gaelic Ireland, the political order that existed in Ireland prior to the Norman invasion
The rest of them are aspects of Ireland (the island) that are appropriate to find via the Ireland article, the accompanying article Names of the Irish state, or perhaps something along the lines of List of Irish states, Succession of sovereignties in Ireland, or possibilities i probably still wouldn't blunder onto if i kept listing possibilities. I've moved those entries to this talk page rather than just discarding them where they don't belong, in the hope that the work of compiling them will not be wasted if the accompanying article (which is now a see-also entry on the Dab'n page for "Ireland") doesn't leave them redundant, and to draw attention to the possibility that there are roles, valid for WP but which were misplaced onto the Dab page, that should be provided for on new or existing pages. --Jerzy•t 07:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Dab material removed from Dab [[Ireland (disambiguation)]] 

message: Is the football team and the passport not notable? funny, I thought the football was one of the best in the world and the passport was one of the most unique in the world. Silly me that must be crap I don't understand. ~ R.T.G 14:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have trouble understanding your English.  What exactly does your point about the passport have to do with the Name of the state?  Likewise, what exactly does your point about the name of the association football team have to do with the name of the state?  Your meandering additions to the article add nothing.  I removed your additions as per WP:BRD - I suggest you familiarize yourself with this policy.  Finally, keep off my Talk page.  Any page I edit is on my watch list. --HighKing (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the football team names are notable and should be restored.  --Rumping (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: copied from another user talk:
Hi, you recently reverted an edit where I reverted a user trying to insert the following into an article:
The state's national football team, while often referred to (including by itself) as "Ireland", officially plays as the "Republic of Ireland" because Northern Ireland also fields a team in international competitions and in 1954 FIFA was no longer prepared to tolerate two teams called "Ireland".  Can you help me understand why you believe that this is relevant in the article?  It appears in the "official description" section, but it has nothing to do with the official description.  Is there some dispute over the description and you're using the football team as an example of something?  Thank you. --HighKing (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: The name of the national football team which plays its home games in Dublin is the "Republic of Ireland".  It is the representative team of the state which has its capital in Dublin, so its name is relevant to the question of the name of the Irish state. In fact the point was in the article for some time before you were "bold" twice today though I do not think your edit summaries fairly described what you did.--Rumping (talk) 17:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but what has any of that got to do with the name of the national association football team?  It is the representative team of Ireland, for sure, but are you trying to state that the name of the team somehow affects the name of the state or vice versa?  --HighKing (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is an example of a particular use which had to deal with the state/island distinction and therefore relevant.  Compare with the Ireland national rugby union team, which is also a representative team, but of a larger Ireland (the Ireland international rules football team and Ireland cricket team are similar to the rugby team). --Rumping (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So to be clear, this is being used as an example where the description of the state is being used to disambiguate between the name of the island and the name of the state?  If this the correct understanding, let's split it out into it's own section and make the point more clearly.  At the moment it's just not that clear why the point is being made.  --HighKing (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Removal is denialism. Djegan (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Insightful.  Still, it'd be great if someone would actually answer the question asked rather than sly personal digs.  --HighKing (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: It's easy for you to say that. Sarah777 (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply put, it is related to Names of the Irish state. You want to suggest that football should be left out here because football is not notable? When was the last time that the national stadium was not sold out to a match of international football? Surely there is some way that people make their support of football notable and if one per cent of the population arrives for limited seats at every match..? Will I cite some of this stuff? ~ R.T.G 18:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well ... I'd much rather if you didn't presume to attribute incorrect motives to me.  I am not suggesting that football is not notable.  I'm suggesting that the entire point is irrelevant to this section of the article, which is describing the official description of the state.  If the article was about the football team itself and was describing how the name of the team was decided, this point is notable.  Or if the article had a section describing how the description of the state is used as a name for certain objects or organizations, then this could be included as a notable point.  But to lump it into a section that is describing the Act and the description makes no sense and is irrelevant.  While I believe I now understand why other editors feel that the point may be notable, it should moved to an appropriate section.  --HighKing (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Then you move into the place it is relevant or leave it alone. Delete stuff that is incorrect or unsuitable for the article. Counter productivity will not get the job done. "I'd much rather if you didn't presume to attribute incorrect motives to me" - it's getting off the topic now, that is an wikt:obscure remark with no bearing on this article, qoute the attribution of your motives because I do not see it. ~ R.T.G 23:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuff as you call it, that is deemed irrelevant and off-topic, will be obviously removed.  If you take the time to follow the discussion above, you'll see that there is an obvious and good faith attempt being made on my part to understand why the football team name is relevant.  So far, none of the editors that claim it is relevant have tried to answer my straight-forward questions, and I'm in the dark.  I've made a suggestion as to why it might be relevant, but it would be nice if you could confirm.  And I also answered your query already on your "presumptuousness" - once again I invite you to read what has already been said above (hint:notability of football), or use spectacles to "see" it.  That way both our times will be less wasted, and more productive.  --HighKing (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

text: The football team is very popular in Ireland you know. They represent the state. They got knocked out last time but they are world class. We love them here in Ireland. Roy Keane? Robbie Keane? Eamonn Dunphy? Jackie Charlton? Ooh ahh Paul Mcgrath? They're worth it Highking. Who is more worth it? ~ R.T.G 07:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Some claim that Tara was a place where European kings were crowned and in German Deutsche Europe sounds Air-ope like Eire but I cannot recall that good source for the Euro-kings study. I think this page could be moved to Names of Irish states for a better article, any opinions on that? ~ R.T.G 18:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of info on the football team and the passport 

message: I don't really think the Belfast Agreement actually resolved anything on the name of the Irish state.  It talked about the Government of Ireland and the Constitution of Ireland, a body and a document, but it did not seem to use a name for the state or the geographical area which is that part of the island of Ireland which is not Northern Ireland.  By contrast, Northern Ireland was mentioned frequently and United Kingdom occasionally.  A star to anyone who can find something better at  which is clearer and more explicit than either South as in "North and South", or the like area and extent of application as the laws enacted by the Parliament that existed immediately before the coming into operation of this Constitution meaning the territory of the pre-1937 Irish Free State. --Rumping (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely right, Rumping. If anything the document gives stronger precedence to the island of Ireland and Northern Ireland both terms capitalised as such when they appear. It says Irish Government not Government of Ireland (these people are smart). It reaffirms the right to Irish citizenship any part of the island. Contrary dispute is a) seperatist to the point of social exclusion and b) militant to the point of claiming ground on a fought for in blood basis. These are ridiculous and are ideals that surely predate the people of Ireland such as shouting "woof" and running. The rest of it is stuff like "We will meet and talk about all things that are best for Northern Ireland." "We will not be killing each other." "We will be equal people." and "We will not nick all the funds the minute we get them." As like any good legal documents do as well as stuff specific to people in specific situations. ~ R.T.G 16:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Striking, to be fair, a lot of it was fought and died for. I can't get this arguments for dulling of the islands title. Sorry and not the first time in some days now. There was no naming dispute to resolve, Rumping. It's rare Irish will object the republic because people who died for the country named it so. It is a title deserving not imposed. Any judge taking a snipe at a British document is just that and nothing more. ~ R.T.G 08:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution and the Belfast Agreement 

message: There has never been a the Irish state. There is of course one today that may be seen as "The State Ireland" (close but not the whole biscuit). ~ R.T.G 18:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I recommend Names of Ireland - if anything. Djegan (talk) 18:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good gods. No, thank you, RTG. -- Evertype·✆ 19:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a the Irish state? If not, is the title accurate? Any pros and cons? ~ R.T.G 02:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a relatively small semantic issue, probably best to leave alone.  Could also suggest "Historic names of Ireland (state)" for example....  :-)  --HighKing (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whats historic about it? The state still exists. Djegan (talk) 13:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Names of the Republic of Ireland? What a hilariously ironic suggestion!213.202.176.154 (talk) 14:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is Names of Ireland (state) 'nonsense'? I'd prefer Names of Ireland, but that's obviously ambiguous, also referring to the island.hippo43 (talk) 14:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because neither the constitution nor the law do call the place "Ireland (state)". Disambiguation in this manner is just a nonsense and shambles. The place is more than just a state, its a people with shared culture, economy, history, etc - it is also a country and nation. A job worth doing, is a job worth doing right - so it should be "Ireland" or "Republic of Ireland". Djegan (talk) 15:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, why is disambiguation nonsense (and a shambles)? Disambiguation is commonly used throughout wikipedia and seems useful when a word refers to a country and an island which are not synonymous. Names of Ireland is ambiguous. Names of the Republic of Ireland is problematic because the Republic of Ireland is not a name, is one of the various terms discussed in the article and only refers to the state (as a description) fairly recently. In any case, this article is about the names of the state, not the people, nation, culture, economy etc. hippo43 (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the state was founded in 1922, with the present name since 1937, and with the present description since 1949 - I would hardly refer to the description as "fairly recently". Djegan (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article refers to names for Ireland from 1171, well before Ireland existed as a republic, so 1949 is 'fairly recently'.hippo43 (talk) 17:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So it is an article on Ireland, not just the state. The state did not exist before 1922. Djegan (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The current state did not exist before 1922. The article covers older names for the state/s that previously existed on the island. 'Lordship of Ireland', for example, does not refer to the island/people/culture etc.hippo43 (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: How richly ironic.  You argue that Names of Ireland (state) is nonsense and argue that neither the constitution or law call the place "Ireland (state)", and then you argue for using "Republic of Ireland" instead (which neither the constitution or law name it either).  Made me laugh.  --HighKing (talk) 16:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is pretty immature, but so amusing all the same!--Theosony (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Well I am still laughing at your "historic..." suggestion. Djegan (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Only because you misread what I suggested.  The "historic" part refers to the names.  Most people seemed to get it - not sure why you didn't.  And the reason to suggest "historic" is because there is only one name for the Irish state, therefore (by process of logic), the rest are historic :-).  --HighKing (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe your still laughing, but moving on to a more mature footing... There are still many people who use "Irish Republic", "Eire", "Southern Ireland", "Republic of Ireland" as the name - they are hardly "historic" names, they are very much current. The colloquial names section for instance is a reminder of how past names are anything but historic. Djegan (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Not sure why 'historic' is funny - yes, the state still exists, but has had many names throughout history - I'm fairly sure that's what HighKing meant.hippo43 (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: I Oppose any move of this article. The name of the article is very clear and appropriate. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to [[Names of Irish states]] 

message: "Éire" is a different word than "Éireann" ... right?
So if Éire is Ireland in English, then is Éireann ... what?
ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Éireann is the genitive case of Éire. It means "of Ireland". +Angr 06:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Both Saorstát Éireann and Saorstát na hÉireann are literally "Free State of Ireland" rather than "Irish Free State" (which would be Saorstát Éireannach). But perhaps the official English name and the official Irish name are not literal translations of each other. +Angr 11:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: not quite. Éireannach is Irish, and Éireann (or na hÉireann) is Ireland's. --Red King (talk) 13:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''"Éire"''' is a different word than '''"Éireann"''' ... right? 

message: I have reverted a huge (500+ chars) reversion by User:OneNightinHackney going back many edits.  This threw the baby out with the bath water.  However the rights and wrongs of its origins, the article had improved significantly as a result.  The text matched the legal and constitutional reality: ONiH's version does not do that.  It is completely contrary to the consensus rules to make such a major edit without prior discussion.  It does not matter that the change was initiated by a subsequently banned editor: a number of other editors had worked on it since.  Before you revert it again, please discuss it here.  Which words do you not like and what is your basis for doing so.  --Red King (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you weren't in such a rush to disruptively act as a proxy/meatpuppet for an editor unwelcome to edit Wikipedia, you might have actually got something right in what you've written above. If you had checked the history you would find I only reverted changes made by *one* editor, back to the consensus version of 19 January, and the only actual changes made to the article since then were by a disruptive editor using sockpuppets to evade his wholly justified indef block who you are now a proxy/meatpuppet for. If you continue down this road, I'll ensure action is taken against you for it. 2 lines of K303 13:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you could manage to express yourself without ressorting to insulting ad hominem attacks, I might take you seriously. --Red King (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: However I will accept the opinion of a neutral third party. --Red King (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 February 10

message: I've checked the Annals of the Four Masters at http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T100005A/ but can't find any of these names.  Am I missing something obvious (because some are well known). --Red King (talk) 14:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you are talking about this edit creating the Ancient section, by User:HighKing in May 2009.  Perhaps the Annals of the Four Masters statement is missing a bullet and was not intended to cover the other bullet points. Hibernia for example has much older sources. --Rumping (talk) 01:11, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Whether or which, all of these names lack citation. --Red King (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical names 

message: I've no real problem with the current name, except that mythological names are included in the article, e.g. Ériu, Fódla, etc, which do not refer to any state in a ny modern sense. Perhaps there could be a split in the article with a new article created at 'Mythological names for Ireland'.
Another issue is that the article deals with the name on an all-Ireland basis, then suddenly from 1921 stops dealing with the north.
Third issue is the 'Irish state' clearly refers to the post-1921 state, not any of the pre-existing states, so the article, if dealing with more than one state (by common usage, the post-1921 one), the title should be pluralised and should also include names of Northern Ireland.
As a proposed solution, there could be a 'Names of Ireland' page giving pre-1921 names, then a split into 'Names of the Irish state' and 'Names of Northern Ireland', similar to what's done with the history articles. - Dalta (talk) 21:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name issue again 

message: I'm not sure why we have the article Republic of Ireland (term). The material it covers is fully covered in this article. The title Republic of Ireland (name) redirects here rather than there. Why does that article exist? It looks like a pointless fork to me. --Red King (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A pointless fork is what it is. I've redirected it. JonCTalk 19:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted pending discussion here. JonCTalk 20:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of content in 'Republic of Ireland (term)' 

message: I see no mention of the Provisional Government of Ireland (1922) in the article. Surely this omission, even though short lived, should be corrected. ww2censor (talk) 10:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In what way is it relevant to any name given to the state? Dmcq (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: How is that NOT relevant, when it was name of the state for 11 months? ww2censor (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: (Coming late to the party) Provisional Government of Ireland (1922) was a compromise title for the article: see Talk:Provisional Government of Ireland (1922)#Requested move 8 April 2015. The compromise was necessary because there was no name specifically given to the country during those 11 months. The Provisional Government was simply called "The Provisional Government".  Scolaire (talk) 08:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Provisional Government of Ireland (1922)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Names of the Irish state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070713181704/http://acts.oireachtas.ie/zza1y1922.1.html to http://acts.oireachtas.ie/zza1y1922.1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Names of the Irish state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120920235241/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0518/D.0518.200004130005.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0518/D.0518.200004130005.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
-----------
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721123405/http://www.constitution.ie/constitutional-reviews/crg.asp to http://www.constitution.ie/constitutional-reviews/crg.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cartref.demon.co.uk/eng/stamps/eire03.htm
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Names of the Irish state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607112100/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607112100/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607112100/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607112100/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0067/D.0067.193705250014.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Names of the Irish state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140826113641/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0068/D.0068.193706090018.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0068/D.0068.193706090018.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100308073939/http://www.ndc.ie/news/NDC-Launches-Nationwide-Campaign.asp to http://www.ndc.ie/news/NDC-Launches-Nationwide-Campaign.asp
*Added archive http://collection.europarchive.org/nli/20120918211857/http://www.farmersjournal.ie/site/farming-One-in-every-four-litres-of-drinking-milk-now-imported-13336.html to http://www.farmersjournal.ie/site/farming-One-in-every-four-litres-of-drinking-milk-now-imported-13336.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Names of the Irish state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060705080312/http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/applying/eeaeunationals to http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/applying/eeaeunationals
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Google is using "Republic Of Ireland" as the name of the country in its Google News website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.209.180.229 (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2018 - Google -  "Republic of Ireland". 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* Eirepas.JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  deletion request rolled back jnestorius(talk) 16:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Where is there evidence for this statement?Ériugena (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Until the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, British government and media declined to use the name 'Ireland', preferring 'Eire' (without accent) until 1949 and 'Republic of Ireland' thereafter.