lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Ed, Edd n Eddy Season 6 episodes

message: A user has deleted a page for a fake reason. At Comic-Con 2007, season 6 was not cancelled. May be due to the fact it won't start until 2008. Please create this page again. --The cartoon dude 00:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is it that you don't get about "there will be no season 6 at this time?" That means that as of right now, there IS NO SEASON 6. Whether there will be in the future remians to be seen. -- Elaich  talk 17:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually There Is. Cartoon Network Announced The Ending Of Season 5 (Not The Last Episode). And They Asked For 2 More Seasons CartoonSpot121 (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They just aired the first episode of the sixth season (May I Have This Ed and Look Before You Ed) in Australia and the UK.  So I remade the article.--Particleman24 (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 6 Was Not Canceled 

message: Please don't delete this article, because I don't have the patience to make it all over again.--Particleman24 (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DO NOT DELETE!
Talk:Sydney University Musical Society

message: 10:37, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
This was an entry for Sydney University Musical Society. The content, which includes the history of the choir, was taken from our website www.sums.org.au.
Bernadette85 00:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. And this is a problem; unfortunately, we do not accept copyrighted materials.  Please see template:sd-copyvio for information on how, if you are the author of the text, to allow attribution for it on Wikipedia. The Evil Spartan 00:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Superior (manga)

message: There is nothing written about the author. 
Information on the author would be benifitual for the article page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.96.251 (talk) 02:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brompton, London

message: The West Brompton article says that it is now separate from Brompton itself - but this article says that Brompton extends as far as Brompton Cemetary, which the WB article says is in West Brompton (whilst the Brompton Cemetary article says that it is in Earl's Court). -- Beardo (talk) 14:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Newport Corporation

message: Is this a proper redirect, or is a disambiguation page needed?  I do not see the term Newport Corporation in the article redirected to, Newport City Council.  I was going to create a stub under Newport Corporation for the major company that goes by that formal name and, more commonly, Newport, and whose website is www.newport.com.  I intended to then link to Newport Corporation from Newport (disambiguation). Edurant 00:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper redirect?
Talk:Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant

message: Correction needed in the Reference list the first one was changed and the correct link is : http://www.nti.org/learn/facilities/783/
Pasztory (talk) 06:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link correction 
Talk:Bloody Roar 4

message: Should not redirect! It's another version of the game!
Problem solved.--Neofcon (talk) 04:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection 

message: Aren't brawlers games like Final Fight where you move around and area and enemies come from off screen and attack you? This is a fighting game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gopherbassist (talk • contribs) 06:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brawler?
Talk:Parliamentary privilege

message: It seems as if a senior judge has warned MPs they may not be able to violate a court injunction even if speaking in Parliament. 'Hiding behind parliamentary privilege was not a clear-cut defence either, he [England's Lord Chief Justice] warned. Lord Neuberger, the senior judge who chaired the year-long inquiry into injunctions, added that the law surrounding parliamentary privilege was "astonishingly unclear".'
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics-news/2011/05/21/politicians-warned-they-face-jail-if-they-break-injunctions-86908-23146315/
174.115.226.95 (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Freedom of Speech

message: So can MPs in the UK be arrested or are they protected against that?  Do they have to be sacked first?   If so who sacks them as MPs, is it the queen or can the rest of parliament do it or is the speaker?
Thanks
CaptinJohn 13:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no privilege now against arrest for a crime or even something less (Archibald Maule Ramsay). Arrest for a civil default is uncertain now after M v. Home Office but probably no longer privileged. The House of Commons itself can expel an MP, that's one of its privileges!: see Charles Bradlaugh, Garry Allighan, ... Cutler 17:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrest

message: Is it actually the case that legislators are forbidden by convention from using the word "liar", or simply that they may not call each other liar? If the former, then it is not always enforced: just today, Gerald Howarth referred to Mohamed Al-Fayed as "this thief, crook and liar" in the House of Commons, and the BBC News report does not say that the Speaker reproved him for his comments. Loganberry (Talk) 19:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "liar" 
Talk:Descent (2007 film)

message: Maya's rape is disgusting and cruel, but "brutal"? The rape in Irreversible is "brutal", but the rape in Descent isn't "brutal". This isn't to undermine the horrific nature of rape, but he never hits her once, he doesn't yell at her, he doesn't tear at her clothing. Perhaps any attempt to "grade" rape is foolish, and I do not - in any way - mean to undermine the horror of rape, but Jared isn't brutal in raping her. This point is important because it is Jared's sweet words and fawning affection that is the biggest sting to Maya later. If Jared had been brutish and cruel, Maya perhaps could have recovered from that. She blames herself for listening and being swayed by his wooing machinations. When he rapes her, he does so kissing her and touching her face. His words that once had been so sweet, are spoken with the same tenderness, but now they are racist and demeaning. This is the source of her pain, the fact that - though she is very intelligent and wise - she allowed him to manipulate her pride and desire to be wanted to get her exactly where he wanted her. If he had been brutal, she wouldn't be punishing herself so much for being taken in by his lies. She is so wounded because she was completely taken in by him, kissing and touching in bed before the rape occurs. Jared most definitely rapes her, there is no doubt about that, but to call the rape "brutal" simply isn't accurate. I have made a change to the page, removing the word "brutal" from the description. Supertheman (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. Rape is horrible, but the scene does not depict a "brutal" rape. Cjcaesar (talk) 03:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Brutal rape?
Talk:William Rhodes (sculptor)

message: This article is just barely missing getting deleted under CSD G11 for blatant advertising - and the only reason I'm not doing so is because there are some actual references. It's loaded with peacock words and all sorts of promotional stuff. Please clean this up! Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam tag
Talk:Autoramas

message: This is a Brazilian band that has already released 4 albums and gone on multiple international tours.--Guaxini 01:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Portuguese article claims they played at Rock in Rio III and cites this source, but the source article doesn't say anything about Rock in Rio III/3. (They did play at Rock in Rio 5.) I even checked the Rock in Rio site and they're not listed in the 2001 lineup. There's an entry on Setlist.fm but no setlist. I suspect someone mixed up 3 and 5. Can anyone find a better source? --Rosekelleher (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock in Rio III?
Talk:I Don't Dance (High School Musical song)

message: I removed the material about how the song fit into the plot of the movie because it was confusing, and the material about the original plan for the song because it was unsourced. Please feel free to reinstate the material if it can be rewritten and improved (for the plot) and sourced (for the original plan). --Metropolitan90 01:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content
Talk:Tetranitrogen

message: Needs cleanup and expansion.
"A lot" isn't common chemistry terminology.
72.147.118.54 01:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It's always the sigma bond which is the strongest part. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is D(N≡N) > 3D(N-N)?
Talk:Fantaisie in F minor (Chopin)

message: "It is certainly Chopin's greatest." seems kinda... opinionated. 68.206.142.240 (talk) 17:04, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ...so fix it. - Jredmond (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  opinionated 
Template talk:Louisiana House of Representatives

message: This template is out of date. The updated list can be found at LA House of Represenatives and LA State Senate and if it is similar to the problems with the related article then a list of errors is at Talk:Members of the Louisiana House of Representatives
Loosecannon93 (talk) 03:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Template update done. Hekerui (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update template
Talk:Sa (disambiguation)

message: Moved to or already covered in SA disambig page
:*Students’ Association
:* Something Awful
:* Socialist Appeal
:* Skate America
:* Suomen Armeija, Finnish Defence Forces
:* Sexaholics Anonymous, Sexaholics Anonymous
:* SA, a nickname for Doug Martinez of 311.
Deleted:
:*arsine, a toxic gas --REASON: no mention in arsine article, no explanation of why 'sa' should stand for it rather than AsH3
:*“(sa),” Sallallahu alayhi wasallam --REASON: article says the abbreviation is 'SAW' and it's on that disambig page.
:*in Samoan culture, a period of rest --REASON: no mention of it in linked article
:* Sa, a nickname for Melissa Joan Hart --REASON: no mention of it in linked article
Rexparry sydney 01:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries moved or deleted
Talk:LSI Corporation

message: Large-scale Integration, a relative measure of how many transistors were placed onto a semiconductor chip.
Integrated_circuit#LSI  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickyrazz (talk • contribs) 04:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "LSI" stands for? 
Talk:TSS Earnslaw

message: This article states that the Earnslaw's maiden voyage to Queenstown was on 24 February 1912. A plaque commemorating the ship's building close to Dunedin Railway Station claims its maiden voyage was on 18 October 1912. Which is correct? Grutness...wha? 03:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have clarified the narrative in the History section.  The vessel was re-assembled and first launched at Kingston on 24 February 1912, but it took until October to complete the construction, undertake trials, and have the maiden voyage to Queenstown on 18 October 1912.Marshelec (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What date in 1912? 

message: I have had a brief look into the archives of Lloyd's Register. So far, I have found a listing for TS Earnslaw in 1960 , and in 1971 . However, it is far from clear that listing on the register was continued. I can't find it in 1981, or in 1991. It might be necessary to remove the claim about it being the last coal-fired passenger vessel on the register.-- Marshelec (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Marshelec The latest I could find it registered on the register was for 1978 , I think it would be worth deleting this claim. Chexmin (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lloyd's Register
Talk:Second Manifesto

message: Very nice work as usual, SESmith. Cool Hand Luke 02:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A major restructuring proposal for all polygamy articles related to Mormonism has been made at Talk:Joseph Smith, Jr. and polygamy#Series and Restructuring proposal.  Please visit and give your two cents. --Descartes1979 (talk) 04:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major restructuring proposal 

message: The citation for the text of the manifesto is incorrect--should be p. 75--see http://archive.org/stream/conferencereport1904a/conferencereport741chur#page/74/mode/2up 76.23.51.252 (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: I disagree with the inclusion of "public" and removal of "accurate description" in these edits by the anon IP. Inclusion of "public" implies that there is a "non-public" attitude of the Church, which is POV and unsupported by any of the citations. There is also a distinction between what the attitudes and teachings of the Church as an institution, and the attitude of its members. I would argue this is similar to the subject of abortion and the Catholic Church - would we say that the Catholic Church has public attitude toward abortion and imply that it has a non-public attitude? I also find the reference in one of the edit summaries to this SLTrib article to be irrelevant. The article is discussing polygamy in the present in a different context than the statement in question in this article, which is about the Church's attitude to the statements in the Second Manifesto. The former is about implications for a theology that teaches eternal marriage, while the latter is about one man being married with two living women concurrently. If you have sources that support the idea that the Church has a non-public attitude, please share them here. --FyzixFighter (talk) 00:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As any source that is presented you will take out of context or claim has an anti-Mormon bias, and I have a life outside of Wikipedia, I leave the article to your loving hands. You "win".98.30.43.66 (talk) 17:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church's "public" attitude
Talk:Die Kreuzen

message: This band had a side-project called Boy Dirt Car.  The band made at least three albums, so it warrants mention in this article, if not a separate article. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boy Dirt Car

message: Deleted this - thought it was both unneccesary and quite patronising.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salicouscrumb (talk • contribs) 20:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's back now, and it warrants mention because Moore is regardied as "notable." Morganfitzp (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thurston Moore Quote 

message: The German for "sign of the cross" is "Kreuzzeichen" which translates directly to "cross sign". "Die Kreuzen" simply means "the crosses" and nothing else. This is why I deleted the erroneous claim that the band's name has both meanings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.201.66 (talk) 02:21, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "sign of the cross" 
Talk:Commonweal (magazine)

message: spurned sectarianism and religious dogmatism sounds decidedly liberal, almost as if it came from press release?
:Have you read a copy?  Sounds accurate to me. Pustelnik (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The first commenter is exactly right.  The description of the magazine reads like an adulatory press release.  And the list of positions intended to illustrate its political diversity is freakin laughable, given that they are pretty much all associated with one side of the political spectrum, excepting perhaps an opposition to abortion, support for which would be a step too far for a magazine that claims to be Catholic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.154.75 (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sectarianism

message: There needs to be information on what is Commonweal's standing with the Church, how many bishops support it, how they have supported it, etc. ADM (talk) 13:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Church standing
Talk:Halo 2 Weapons

message: ill merge but how do i dot it???
You might want to look at WP:Merge & WP:BOLD. The first one has directions for merging. Good luck! Oh, two things: First of all, when you leave messages, it's part of the etiquette to sign your posts, which you can do by typing four tildes (~) in a row: ~~~~. That'll leave your Username, the time & the date. Good luck and happy editing. I look forward to reading your contributions. Oh, and for the record it's impressive how quickly you're picking up the wikipedia markup language to format things. Zelse81 02:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maureen Johnson (Heinlein character)

message: First, I goofed when I created the article.  Despite her many names, she is most often know in Hainlein references as "Maureen Johnson."  Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix the article to that name.
Secondly, in the Heinlein "Lazarus Long" cycle, she is second-most important character and the only one which Heinlein devoted an entire fictional "memoir" to.  Perhaps this can be explained as the article is expanded (I'm hoping more Heinlein fans will add to it; else, I will).
Third, how can you add references to a fictional character other than by stating what novels they come from?  The "notability" template I can understand, the "unreferenced" template is beyond loopy.  Sir Rhosis 02:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to the name I think makes the most sense given the existence of an article for a different Maureen Johnson. As to the unreferenced template, I'd suggest more specific citations would be appropriate if you're using the books as references and that the "primarysources" template would then apply. I'd suggest references to literary criticism would be preferable. I can't really help with the explanation you speak of because I'm not familiar with the character herself. Erechtheus 02:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for your help and suggestions.  I'll work on it in the days to come.  Best, Sir Rhosis 02:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and Name
Talk:Menzies Research Centre

message: "As a leading public policy institute ..." - this paragraph is lifted directly off the institute's own website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.12.172.254 (talk) 02:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the paragraph you refer to- it read very much like an advertisement, and did not seem to me like it added any new information that wasn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. I believe it is now ready for the 'Conflict of interest' tag to be removed- do you agree? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Donnie Darko (character)

message: Why is this page named "Donald Darko" when the main character is referred only as Donnie throughout the film? If you wanted a distinction between the movie page and an individual character page, it would seem to make more sense to name the character page something like "Donnie Darko (fictional_character)" instead of naming the page with an incorrect name simply to make a distinction between the two pages. 
Kat 02:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's refered to as Donald Darko several times. Sam Orchard 15:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I agree with Kat. His full name may be Donald Darko, but he is best known as Donnie Darko. I'll rename the page. --DearPrudence (talk) 06:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of Title 

message: The article states, first up, that Donnie is 'horny'. This doesn't fit his character, as he isn't portrayed in a 'super-mega-wanting-to-have-sex-all-the-time-and-chasing-girls-for-sex-so-very-horny-can't-resist' light. It's a bit weird to just call someone horny. How the hell would we know? 
58.178.12.54 (talk) 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't. This article should be merged to the film article. –Pomte 04:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I've changed it to "sexually-curious" (although there might be a better word to use), but next time, be bold and change it yourself! --DearPrudence (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horny?
Talk:Roscoe Wind Farm

message: The line "Unlike fossil-fueled power plants, wind farms require no water and generate no carbon dioxide -- a heat-trapping greenhouse gas that is a major contributory component for global warming.[1]" sounds a lot like a sales pitch and all though true it's a general statement about wind energy and has little value in the current context. Beter to replace with the amount carbon emissions prevented and/or barrels of oil not burned. 
Pcmadman (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If there are actual generation numbers available (i.e., MWh/year, or Capacity:Generation ratio), we should find them; installed capacity is one thing, but says nothing about the actual output of the wind farm.
Fordi (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity factor? 

message: The comparison of the wind farm to "Several times the size of Manhattan" isn't informative. It should be replaced with either an acutal number or a better comparison altogether.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colorado2993 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size Comparison
Talk:Pleasure Point roadhouse

message: The article had a prod, which was removed - the next step is likely to be AfD, so I took it upon myself to clean up the article, remove all sourced speculation, and just present the facts.  There are enough reliable sources for this article, but bear in mind most are in conjunction with the recent debate over its future.  The original article is below, in its entity.  Feel free to pick and choose from it. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: As a longtime renter, I have to say this treasure was destroyed by trying to preserve it.
For 35+ years, Naslund charged virtually no rent (I paid $186/mo), in support of many people who wandered through life, or did great work from there -- e.g., John James developed an instrumental early AIDS newsletter.  He's pictured in the second cabin of 2-3905 in this article: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/04/john-james-aids-treatments-covid-pandemic/618679/
It was only when the renters developed an adversarial relationship to Naslund and threatened to control the property through the historical designation that they were ousted and the beautiful gem torn down.  This happened after the longstanding tenants who selected new renters for their kindness were ousted by a more politicized group.
But such is anecdotal and unattributable, and hence unusable.
I would recommend a list of "notable tenants" but, aside from John who has embraced some level of public life, all those I know prefer their privacy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.131.97.80 (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lost history (unusable)
Talk:Jennifer Marohasy

message: I've removed family history (not noteworthy, unverified and unverifiable) and large parts of career, keeping the more notable stuff.  This isn't a myspace page.  The subject has no notable accomplishments and the article is only kept because of her frequent presence in the media on controversial issues as a member of the Institute of Public Affairs and AEF. Phil153 (talk) 01:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Sections
Talk:Nothaphoebe

message: I've removed the material based on or copied from Flora of China. There are only two species in China (of the 40 or so), and that book states that those two might well belong in different genera. Apart from the copyright considerations, that flora is therefore not an appropriate basis for a description of the whole genus. I've also removed the barely relevant material about Lauraceae on Gondwana that was mass-added to many pages by User:Sonia Murillo Perales and a large number of anonymous IP's that include IP:88.27.143.215, the address involved with this page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 12:25, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Flora of China material