Talk:National Museum of Natural History, France

message: The "garden" (Jardin des Plantes de Paris) and the "galeries", all expositions of the museum, make up the "historical heart" of the museum.  But the museum has other sites in and out of Paris over France (Guide map of the museum sites). Toby (YebisYa) IQUEPPE 18:28, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)
:Article rewritten to give history and distinguish the galleries at the Jardin des Plantes from the institution of the Muséum (of which the Jardin is a part). —Tkinias 07:58, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Toby and Tkinias. In connection with the Jardin (the garden) you said, Tkinias, of which the Jardin is a part. In fact we should say of which the Jardin is the siege. Cheers! Kintaro (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sites 

message: As I'm sure many of you know, the word for 'museum' in French is 'musée', yet this place is called a 'muséum'. Does anybody know why it is called such? This information should if possible be included in the article because I'm sure that other French speakers have also wondered at this naming anomaly when reading the article just as I have done. --ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Who knows. Ask the museum owners. It's how they spelled it on their website. - M0rphzone (talk) 04:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ThunderingTyphoons! and M0rphzone. Soon or late I will bring the answer to this question by editing the article (with referenced sources, of course). But before that, I have some other things to do. Kintaro (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Muséum"? 

message: On the website of this museum I see that in several different places they give their name exactly like this: "Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle". I tried to "move" the article title to reflect this, but I am unable to. Surely there is no better reference for how to write this title than the museum website itself? Invertzoo (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A little while ago, I accidentally "moved" the name of the talk page rather than the name of the article. However, I am officially requesting a move for the name of the article, so let us see what happens. Invertzoo (talk) 17:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Invertzoo. Natural history museums, in France and elsewhere, specialise in natural history, not in orthotypography. This is why their website is not correct. Correct French orthotypography for this museum's name is, in French, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. The only capital letter is the first letter in the name because it's an academic teaching institution of national rank. The name musée du Louvre doesn't start with a capital because this famous museum, the Louvre, is a French national museum... but teaches nothing, it is not a teaching institution. The École du Louvre's name starts with a capital following the same rule. It is located in the same building but it is not directly administrated by the musée du Louvre. The above reasons explain this, this, and this (yes, French orthotypography, for titles but not only, is horrendously complicated). Cheers! Kintaro (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  d'Histoire naturelle 

message: "It was founded in 1793 during the French Revolution, but was established earlier in 1635."
These words are synonyms in English, so this sentence makes no sense.   Perhaps there is some difference in French, in which case the translation needs to be improved upon.   For instance "incorporated" could be exchanged for "founded" and it would make sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.76.12 (talk) 21:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi 24.22.76.12. The Jardin royal des plantes médicinales ('Royal Garden of the Medicinal Plants') was officially founded in 1635 (under Louis XIII's rule). It was (and still is) the equivalent institution to a natural history museum, equivalent at 100%. In 1793, when the French king was guillotined (this time the guy was Louis XVI), the royal institution saw its name changed to Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. That's all, it is that simple. Cheers! Kintaro (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded vs. established?? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Museum of Natural History (France). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226074803/http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/foffice/transverse/transverse/accueil.xsp to http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/foffice/transverse/transverse/accueil.xsp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100830142930/http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/foffice/science/science/Enseignement/rubmastere/sspresentmaster.xsp?i=1 to http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/foffice/science/science/Enseignement/rubmastere/sspresentmaster.xsp?i=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I just updated this article's list of directors/presidents to present day, then decided to go back through the article's history to figure out why there is a broken "Night at." reference in that same section. I eventually found that broken reference came from this particular edit by  from May 2021:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Museum_of_Natural_History,_France&diff=1025919523&oldid=1024503997
While I don't doubt Vincent Battesti had good intentions by whatever edit he was making, unfortunately this particular edit appears to have reverted possibly years worth of edits to the article. My guess is that 6 years of edits were lost, taking the article back in time to 2015, around the time he first tried to add the logo to the page. Did anyone else notice this happened? Can something be done about the lost changes here, even though a year's worth of edits have been added to it since then? Monster Iestyn (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly 6 lost years of changes between 2015 and 2021