lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lobelia cardinalis

message: added size dimensions to the " growth " section, please discuss here if there are any concerns.  12.41.255.10 (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  added size dimensions to the " growth " section 

message: One of the pictures on the page is incorrectly identified. It appears to be Salvia splendens 'Scarlet Sage', not Lobelia cardinalis. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lobelia_cardinalis_Plant.jpg
The flower structure and leaf shapes are very different.
I've commented on the wikimedia file, but as I'm not an administrator, could an admin please remove this picture from the page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisfh (talk • contribs) 18:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Achim (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrongly identified picture
Talk:The Fall (Muchamore novel)

message: I think that we should remove the This article's plot summary may be too long or overly detailed. tag as the plot summary is now concise. (Smithyfromdunny (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove This article's plot summary may be too long or overly detailed tag?
Talk:Sonic Youth discography

message: The link to If I Were A Carpenter under Compilation and Soundtrack Appearances goes to a British TV Show page, not the actual album, which has no page.
Twinfountain 23:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Where is it?--N88819 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SYR5

message: Just because the band calls a release an EP does not mean it meets the qualifications. 'Silver Session' is LP length, e.g., and should be included in the albums.  Same with 'Fishtank'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.248.112 (talk) 20:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums vs. EPs

message: In 1987 they did the soundtrack for the movie Made in USA.  It was re-released in the mid 90s on cd.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonlimeotter (talk • contribs) 06:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made in USA soundtrack
Talk:Fecal impaction

message: This sentence makes no sense: "Osmotic laxatives such as magnesium citrate works within minutes - 8 hours for onset of action, and even then they may not be sufficient to expel the stool."  Should be "work within minutes," but I don't understand what the sentence is trying to say -- implies that such laxatives work quickly, then says they work slowly.  If there's a broad range in how quickly they take effect, then that should be made clearer. Kirkpete (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Laxatives can mean many different types of drug, so I think this sent is saying there is a range in onset of action. Agree poorly phrased. lesion (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Term not used or explained in article. 86.159.197.174 (talk) 04:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "coprostasis" redirect here? 

message: The phrase "work within minutes - 8 hours" is obscure. Does it mean "commences at any time in that period"? Surely not. Editors should not write carelessly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:1EB3:1C00:7816:6592:640F:72FA (talk) 05:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obscure 

message: what is milk?
Milk is whitish fluid that scerated by the mammary gland of famale mammals for own baby weaned i.e.Milk 103.94.255.39 (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDT
Talk:Tim Willocks

message: added some info to show more accurately where Tim was born
due to family ties i will not specify any further accuracy unless ok'd by tim
Chaosdruid (talk) 23:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  general 

message: I have added refs and removed the tag
Chaosdruid (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  refs tag
Talk:Cynara

message: The article says:
* Cynara scolymus is the edible Globe Artichoke. It differs from C. cardunculus in that the leaf lobes and inner bracts of involucre are less spiny.
However, this is inconsistent with the Globe artichoke article, which claims to be about C. cardunculus not C. scolymus.  Furthermore, the Cardoon article also says it is about C. cardunculus, but it concerns the artichoke thistle which looks different from the globe artichoke.  Is anyone able to clear this up?  Jimrhiz (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, according to GRIN, C. scolymus is not considered a species but instead a cultivar group: C. cardunculus Scolymus Group. It seems pretty clear that not everyone abides by this classification based on the large number of hits for a google or google scholar search on "Cynara scolymus". Kingdon (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scolymus versus cardunculus inconsistency
Talk:Aaron Seltzer

message: "He is not very good at his job."
This doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Can someone rephrase that? --81.244.104.147 (talk) 13:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Tone 

message: When this page has been defaced, please allow for a one hour grace period before reverting to a previous version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.245.48.98 (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense! I say: In that case it shall remain defaced! Forever.--84.175.201.4 (talk) 17:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grace Period for Vandalism 

message: It is an opinion when someone says that Friedberg and Seltzer "are talentless hacks."  But it is a pure objective fact when someone says that Friedberg and Seltzer "are considered talentlesss hacks by virtually all movie critics and the majority of moviegoers."  If you're that obsessed with backing it up with sources, you can cite the rankings of their movies on sites like IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes. -- drumwolf (not a registered Wikipedia account)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.150.8.10 (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing Friedberg and Seltzer's negative reputation
Talk:Field hospital

message: If the following sentence is easily understood by military medical personnel it should still be revised so that general readers can understand it:  "A team of Medical Corps officers modified the basic War Department for a standard 25-bed station hospital into a new theater and table of basic for a portable hospital of 25-beds."  Arcanicus (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??? 

message: This article contains whole sentences, word for word, from this article Portable Surgical Hospitals by John T. Greenwood, Ph.D.  —mattisse (Talk) 16:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything published by the federal government is in the public domain. The ".mil" of the URL indicates that the web page is a U.S. military web page. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close paraphrase or copyvio
Talk:Bellis

message: From reading this article, I get the impression that Bellis are all types of daisies. If that's correct, it would be a very helpful thing to add to the article.-- Laura S | talk to me 16:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It says they have "have radiate flower heads", which is clear if one knows what that means, but not clear to most people - I would guess. It would be usefully if you added more information to the page, since information is very sparse right now. Hardyplants (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Daisies?

message: The list on the page include two B. annua subspecies -
Bellis annua subsp. microcephala
Bellis annua subsp. minuta
They have their own pages as tiny stubs.
I'm not convinced it's practical for them to have their own pages as the subspecies differences are best stated in a single line (for each) on the B. annua page, which I've done as best I had information for them. 
Meteorquake (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  B. annua subspecies
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not aniconistic

message: It does come up enough to cause plenty of disruption. This is not a preemptive action, but a response to ongoing issues. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 13:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frequency

message: I'm going to try to bring this discussion back to life, to figure out what to do with it after all.  
Please join us at the village pump for discussion 
--ProtectWomen 16:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dr. Frankensteina" 

message: Somebody suggested merging this into WP:NOT#CENSORED. I am against this merge, as this warrents its own section at a minimum. It would be better to just add it somewhere else on WP:NOT, or to not move it at all.--Sefringle 02:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Specific examples do not belong in WP:NOT, we are not a lot of things, but they are covered by the general topics at WP:NOT. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 13:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Is "aniconistic" a real word? --MZMcBride 00:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More of a philosophical question, really.  What does a word have to have in order to qualify as "real"?  :) .  Googling shows that it's not exactly a popular word, but it has been used in reliable sources.  My standard is "Do people know what I'm talking about when I use the word?", and by that standard, it is a real word.  --Alecmconroy 01:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My definition of a real word involves the word being found in a legitimate dictionary. I looked in Oxford, dictionary.com, and tried a define: Google search, all of which turned up nothing. Googling the term gave 476 results, certainly not that impressive given that even typos like becuase have many, many more search results. Also, it should be noted that some of the Google results are Wikipedia mirror sites, and the aniconism article doesn't seem to have any references for this word's use. The reason I put this comment here is that if this page is merged with WP:NOT, we probably want to ensure that this is a real word. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Jose Maria Alviso Adobe

message: Why was the historic barn demolished recently if the ranch layout is being restored to its original state? Julia Rossi 00:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got me. That's what the National Parks Service says. howcheng  {chat} 03:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Barn

message: I am not sure how to update the wiki but here are some additional info
Officially:
- open on march 16, 2013
- Total restoration: $3.75million
- Total exterior restoration of the house cost: $1.75million
Unofficially, the total restoration is estimated to be around $5m per a member of the historical society of Milpitas.
The building was purchased from the nearby church to the city of Milpitas, who wanted to move the street a few feet and needed money to build their church. It took 15 years for the deal to happen. According to the historical society, the church and the city of Milpitas don't like each others. That' why on the day of the opening of the park, the church declined to let anyone park in their private parking.
The main building cannot be visited yet because it is not been renovated. The barn in the back of the property was destroyed because it was in a fixer upper shape. The architect took pictures of the property and rebuild the barn.
All paid by Milpitas tax payer "voluntary".
Yes4me (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional info
Talk:Dove (disambiguation)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Dove (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Dove (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dove (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

message: The article seems to get FTLD and FTD mixed up
:I think you're right. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration is a pathologic finding/process which often represents the underlying etiology of the clinical syndrome frontotemporal dementia. This page conflates the two. -RustavoTalk/Contribs 22:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is true, but it is also the pathologic finding that tends to underly the clinical syndrome of semantic dementia and some cases of progressive nonfluent aphasia, which you removed from the article. sallison 23:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for putting that information back in (corrected to no longer identify FTLD as a "dementia" itself). -RustavoTalk/Contribs 03:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FTLD/FTD

message: I have found this image on commons that seems to talk about this subject : :File:FTLD.jpg. I don't know if it can be useful. Regards Duch (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I've added the jargon tag. Seriously, the genetics part? If you come here to get info about FTLD, you'll end up with it! ⇢ ᴊᴏʜᴀɴɴ 17:24, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Jargon
Talk:Galbanum

message: How can it have "an intense green scent"? (This is found in the first paragraph.) Isn't this mixing sight with smell? Bus stop (talk) 02:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  intense green scent 

message: Hello,
You are invited to join the Essential Oils WikiProject, 
a WikiProject and resource dedicated to the study and improvement of Essential Oil and related articles.
To join the project, just add your name to the participants list. We're so glad you're here! 
Ilikeguys21 (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject 

message: The 'Uses' section of this article is a great big mess! 
 
Long parts seem(ed) like copied & pasted "perfumerers-/avertising-speech"! 
 
Use in or descriptions from antiquity are mixed up in different places with 20st/21st century perfumers' practice description (or product advertising?), also in several places; 
19th century use, and mythological accounts, and "use" is mixed up with very lengthy descriptive parts and with description of different derivatives. 
 
I have now at least put in some empty lines between the different themes, but that article does need several more precise/ appropriate chapter (title)s. 2A02:3031:13:A8B4:1:2:159B:B974 (talk) 13:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaotic article! 

message: Where will this appear?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3031:13:A8B4:1:2:159B:B974 (talk) 13:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  test, test, test
Talk:Gan mao ling

message: MEDRS applies to not only content about regular medicine, but also alternative medicine. This issue was raised by  in the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gan mao ling, however the article was kept. The main claims made in the article are a claim about the effectiveness of the combination remedy, and claims about the effectiveness of the herbal components of the composite remedy. All of these require strong MEDRS support, which currently none of them have. I shall remove all claims of effectiveness from the article. — Charles Stewart (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good.  We can use non-MEDRS sources for historical stuff, so long as we're careful to note that it's a long-disproven historical belief, like the idea that epilepsy was caused by witchcraft or demonic possession, or that malaria was caused by swamp gases.  But yeah, my reason for voting to delete this was that I really don't think that there's going to be much to build an article, not unless maybe some famous Chinese emperor was treated with this (and, most likely succumbed to illness anyways). Hyperion35 (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:MEDRS]]
Talk:Gastric outlet obstruction

message: The article states "The diagnosis is typically made by X-ray, which will show an absent air bubble in the stomach"!! Quite a trick. Do you have a citation for that?Plantsurfer (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it would be quite the trick.  I added a more consistent X-ray showing a clear gastric air-fluid level and a grossly dilated stomach -- Samir 11:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  limitations of x-radiography 

message: ...redirects to this article. Therefore I think it would be appropriate to explain what(tf) Projectile Vomiting is. --BjKa (talk) 17:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Article seems very human-centric. Does PV occur in no other species? --121.220.198.49 (talk) 03:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Projectile Vomiting 

message: Pyloric stenosis and Gastric outlet obstruction have the same ICD10 code and seem to address a similar thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tenbergen (talk • contribs) 03:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Gastrograffin

message: The Title of this article is wrong! There should be single "f" instead of double "f". Can anyone change it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.79.185.207 (talk) 15:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should also use the generic name.  I've redirected it.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The
Talk:Zinnia

message: What does this have to do with anything? Ron Stoppable (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napkins? 

message: For example it must have some sort of bulb/corm/root/tuber so which is it?
As it is an Asteraceae, it presumably has many uses besides the beauty of it's flowers?
Just guessing edibility for starters. Particularly with the mention of Mexico. 
More description of different species .. 82.30.84.177 (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description lacking... 
Talk:Genophobia

message: I think that there is a confusion on this article, as incest is different from rape and pedophilia. Altought they usually appear togheter, incest only implies sexual intercourse between relatives, nothing more (there are even cases of consensual incest between adults). In think that section should be merged with "molestaion".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arrangement (talk • contribs) 18:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Gestational choriocarcinoma

message: — Assignment last updated by Rnguyen4 (talk) 16:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II

message: One of our proposed changes for the article is to edit the order and layout of the article to include the sections laid out in WP:MEDMOS. We also want to expand each of the sections and provide more information found through literature and reliable sources, including adding a section on risk factors for this condition. To further improve on the current content in the article, we want to incorporate more lay language. We also want to add images relating to the condition.
Jkvu25 (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2022 Group 12 proposed edits 

message: Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”? 
* lead section is easy to understand - somewhat, I think there are a lot of scientific terms, if you can add more layman terms or explain what the scientific terms mean. For example, what is hCG?
* Clear structure - Yes, maybe you can add subheaders in each heading so it doesn’t look like one huge paragraph. For example, adding subheaders for the guidelines
* Balanced coverage - yes, all sections have a lot of info
* Neutral content - yes
* Reliable sources - yes
Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?
* Yes, they added lots of information compared to the 2021 version
Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? 
* Yes, I don’t feel persuaded about anything after reading the article. The language used in the article is not arguing for any point of view and is informational. 
S.Li, UCSF (talk) 17:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot on your constructive feedback. I agree that adding "signs and symptoms" and "risk factors" would make the article look more integrated. Our team is planning to work on that. In terms of the references date, as this condition is a rare disease and also because of advancement in medical technologies, early signs and symptoms can be detected to prevent further progression, there wasn't much paper that explicitly review on this condition could be found. But we are still working on polishing the article. Thanks again on your suggestions.  Mchen2022 (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group 11 Peer Review Feedback 

message: (a) Our group has reviewed all the references and that they are now correctly formatted. *Note that as of Aug 4, all references dates were all formatted in years; months and days were removed.
(b) No references were identified as predatory journals. Reference 15 was originally an article on MedLine and is now replaced by another journal article.
(c) Prior to Aug 4, there were duplicated references. Wiki editors have already consolidated the references. No references needed to be consolidated on Aug 4.
SKXu (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2022 Group 12 References Review
Talk:Ghon focus

message: desperately needs a picture of the xray showing primary tb infection.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.77.48 (talk) 22:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: needs picture

message: I do believe that the radiograph shows cavitation of a Simon focus (apical or subapical lesion).
Ghon focus = subpleural midzone nodule.
Ghon complex = Ghon focus + ipsilateral lymphadenopathy.
Ranke complex = fibrocalcific Ghon complex.
220.253.192.200 (talk) 01:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon focus 

message: This picture needs to be changed. A random plain film of TB has no place on a page specific for Ghon focus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.173.105.210 (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: agree I am removing the picture.--Xris0 (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Change Picture
Talk:David Murray (racing driver)

message: This article mentions absolutely nothing about Murray's business activities or involvement with football and rugby.--MacRusgail (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats one of the reasons for the "Stub" rating.Pyrotec (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pseudopodospermum hispanicum

message: I'm pretty sure the vegetable occasionally showing up in US supermarkets and farmer's markets labelled as salsify or oyster plant is Scorzonera, not Tragopogon.  I don't think I've ever seen Tragopogon in a market. Photos of Tragopogon roots I've seen are definitely white, while all the "oyster plant"/"salsify" in markets is black. It might be worth mentioning that common names traditionally associated with Tragopogon are now being used for Scorzonera (unless I'm wrong, and there is a black rooted Tragopogon cultivar).Plantdrew (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salsify in the US 

message: This article gives the impression that what you want to do with salsify is boil it.  I suppose you can, but over here in Sweden, where you can buy salsify in supermarkets, called 'svartrötter' (blackroot) the most common thing to do with it is to peel it and then bake it, often with some other root vegetables.  It is great in a gratin, also.  But I am not sure what to do with this information -- does what I do in my kitchen count as original research?  
Lacreighton (talk) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boiling salsify?  Here we bake it. 

message: Also, do not eat it raw, as it will give you stomach cramps.  Can one refer to the Swedish wikipedia article here as a reference?
 https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svartrot 
Lacreighton (talk) 09:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning?