Talk:State University System of Florida

message: * This page is not for universities to cheerlead.  This page represents the essentials of the SUS, with links to greater detail on the page for the university.Sirberus 17:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether you believe the article is "patently absurd" or not is not the issue.  The citation is to a verifiable, reliable, and neutral source; the article ran on the front page of the Palm Beach Post.  The fact the article is technically self-deprecating only strengthens its reliability.  Most newspapers would not run an article on their front page bashing their own state unless they had carefully cross-checked their facts.  Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research.  --Coolcaesar 17:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, your link is to a "verifiable, reliable, and neutral source" (The Palm Beach Post) but that statement of fact says *nothing* about its relevance to a discussion on the quality of education obtained at Florida Universities. We appreciate your authoritative links to Wikipedia's policy on Verifiability, but I believe the question here is one of relevance. The dating/mating prospects of a Florida graduate is a terribly absurd way to rate Florida schools. If you want to strengthen this article, include "verifiable, reliable, and neutral sources" which speak to Florida graduates job prospectives, acceptance rates at various graduate programs, et cetera. I am a USF Senior who was just accepted to pursue graduate work at Duke... if you want to tell me I'm attending a clown college, I just have no way of believing you. I just read the article you have cited from "The Palm Beach Post" and it is extremely satirical and VERY tongue-in-check, as I expected it would be. You can't honestly cite something that hillarious as verifiable. As if the article wasn't already funny enough (which it truly is) it ends with "SINGLED OUT: Although UF graduates include Pulitzer Prize winners and several U.S. senators, they're barred from these sniffy sites." I would think that anyone with a basic education would realize that this article in the Post is a satiric send-up of snobbish tendencies, and how these prejudices often fail to conform to reality. I'm including a link to this article in the main body of the page... anyone who reads it will immediately appreciate its comic value. Rellman 16:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussion

message: I was bold, and turned the colleges section back into a list sorted by alphabetical order. I looked at the Board of Governor's website and I could not find the breakdown by categories. Also, looking at the history of this page it seems that there has been a lot of reverting and additions. I think the changes I made will be much simpler to maintain and will also prevent edit wars. KnightLago 23:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change

message: UCF is not a Research Flagship.  It says in the Sentinel Article that the Legislation created a Tier System.  I am sorry but don't make UF, FSU, and USF look bad because UCF isn't added into the equation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.253.37.233 (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The source on the page just says "trio of Florida's top-ranked public universities" and "elite, research-oriented public schools in other states." It does not say those three schools are flagships. It also does not break down the other schools into the categories either. If there is a source then that is fine. But without the source the information shouldn't be arranged in the manner you are attempting. Also, I am not a USF or UCF alumnus. KnightLago 21:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FACT

message: In effort not to show any favoritism or grandstanding don't place universities in order of "Popularity" or so called "Prestige" Please leave a neutral page, 
This is mainly directed to placing FSU, USF and U of F above all and makes no sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrNole 485 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintain alphabetical order please 

message: The link provided is broken and thus useless to backup claims that a tier system is in place. SB 1710, which the source is supposedly referring to, does not even mention the word "tier", see here. An active link from the Orlando Sentinel talks about a two-tier system, saying it would be between universities and community colleges but that it has not been implemented yet, see here. Please provide sources to backup the sentence you are re-adding so we can discuss here. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 23:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tier system

message: I reverted edits to the page that restored out-of-date admissions data (from 2007).  In Florida there has been a radical change in admission rates and two-year old data is too old to be even reasonably accurate.  
May I say I see no reason for this admissions data on this page to begin with - it seems to be cheerleading by fans of schools.  So, if you insist on cheerleading then make the data accurate...which means a solid reference back to the university's reference material, not some magazine with old, questionable figures.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.252.231.55 (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admissions data 

message: The endowment column is sortable, but the entries were made in such a way they didn't sort the way you would want. 
I fixed it by adding a prefix to each entry of the form xxxx. It works. If endowments change, simply change the amount and the value of xxxx, making sure to maintain leading zeros. Or if this is too much work, revert, but then change the column so it isn't sortable.--SPhilbrickT 20:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Endowment sorting

message: An image used in this article, File:FGCU.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:FGCU.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I noted that an editor added a special date reference for FSU illuminating when the university changed it's official founding from 1857 to 1851 per this reference: http://www.sptimes.com/News/072900/State/FSU_s_age_change__his.shtml
The editor saw fit to add the note reference Florida State but did not add it for the University of Florida, which changed its founding date from 1905 to 1853.  I subsequently added the UF date reference which has now been reverted.  Can we not agree this kind of notation is penny-ante rival university edit warring and just leave it alone for both schools completely?  This is not a productive activity. And yes, there are additional references available to establish the UF date change nonsense.  Sirberus (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: From the source, it looks like the Florida Board of Control, predecessor to the current Board of Governors, was the entity that in 1935 changed Florida State University and the University of Florida's establishment dates from 1905 to the years they opened - 1857 and 1853, respectively.  Then in the year 2000, Florida State University changed its date of establishment to 1851.  It's footnote-worthy that a university changed its establishment date from the one set by its governing board, but the footnote should explain the whole situation, not just Florida State University's.  I'm adding a footnote with language to cover both sides.  PalmaCeiaJD (talk) 03:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is much more to this story than this St. Pete Times article.  UF has a considerable and noteworthy story on this matter as well, as evidenced by this example source: Gainesville Sun - (1/23/2003): [| Happy Birthday UF...but let's get real here] while FSU actually is returning to a date (1851) used by predecessor schools as evidenced (there are other sources) by this source: [| The Argo (of the Florida State College) Vol II, 1901-1902, pg. 115]  If we are going to tell this story, let's get it right. Sirberus (talk) 09:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The dates are certainly footnote worthy. I'll add them in with better sources than are currently given.--Cúchullain t/c 19:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the issue with the two additional cites?  Why are these changes being reverted? Sirberus (talk) 03:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Date Reference for FSU and UF 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on State University System of Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415043957/http://www.iroffice.ucf.edu/character/current.html to http://www.iroffice.ucf.edu/character/current.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.floridamemory.com/exhibits/timeline/index.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Fsu.edu
    Please Answer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.7.253.114 (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Florida State University's Catch Phrase