lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:R62A (New York City Subway car)

message: R62A (New York City Subway car) →  – There is no reason to disambiguate the page, per WP:DAB. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Isn't there 1 R62A on the (6)?
24.193.156.117 (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you understand the principles of wikipedia? We don't develop conclusions based on what we see. We only reflect things found in sources. Vcohen (talk) 11:59, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Do you want to be blocked? Vcohen (talk) 23:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Comrades, frankly, read a little about wikipedia. How info in wikipedia can be linked to anything outside of it? Vcohen (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: (6)

message: The page mentions that only car 2151 received the original LCL/EXP indicator test. However, it was the full set that received it, cars 2151-2155. Image for proof (original source unknown): https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/772130654657576991/858062596179886117/1481484652_a0d70d0f7c_o.png BenTheMiner (talk) 04:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car number correction 

message: The page highlights the addition of the LCL/EXP indicators for the side route sign. However, these indicators are gradually being removed. The reason is unknown but people suspect that it could be due to issues with them not updating, syncing, or displaying correctly. Another possible cause is the supposed lack of operators actually changing the indicator. Unsure if this information is important for the page so I mentioned it here. BenTheMiner (talk) 04:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side LED indicators being removed 

message: Hello, I'd like to edit this page to add in a photo of mines that I had uploaded not very long ago, showing the side rollsign of an R62A subway car. Reason being, this is to match the other NYCT subway car pages as they've all recently gotten the same to match with each other. Thanks. EmperorOfNYC (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please make your request for a new image to be uploaded to Files For Upload.  Once the file has been properly uploaded, feel free to reactivate this request to have the new image used. Specifically, you'll need to supply the link to the photo you'd like swapped. Lizthegrey (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 April 2023
Talk:R68A (New York City Subway car)

message: When the R160Bs start running on the Q train by the end of the year, I don't know what line it may assign to. I think it may run on the F train to start retiring their R32s and displace most of their R46s, some on the R to have a 100% fleet of R46s, the rest, I don't know. But if the G train gets R160s, the R46s will run on the E, but nobody knows if the R68As will run once R160Bs run on the Q. 
User:Younglink1426480 02:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  R68As to be in other IND/BMT (excluding BMT Eastern Division) lines when the R160Bs assign on the Q 

message: How about we get this issue sorted out here instead of there always being reverts? For what we know and seen and at least one source says that R68A are on the (N), but it seems there are people that want to close their eyes and open them thinking the R68As will be on the (Q) again. --IGeMiNix (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are just a bunch of R160 haters out there who want the R68As back on the . This is what happens on Wikipedia often. They put whatever they want without regarding any facts. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Q is all R160s. The N is partially R68As. 161.130.178.135 (talk) 01:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  (N) (Q) issue 

message: R68A (New York City Subway car) →  – There is no reason to disambiguate the page, per WP:DAB. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Yes, I know no real sources point to the fact that R68As are used on the N and W, like the R68s are. However, it seems that within the R68s assigned to the N/W, the MTA throws in an R68A everyday - perhaps they regard the R68s and R68As as one kind of car. Perhaps there can be an edit indicating that R68As run on the N/W too?
:We follow this data sheet, which states the N/W are only assigned R68s, so until that changes, no changes should be made to this article. R68As have also been running on the G, same for R143s on the J/Z, and a single R142 can pop up on the 6 during rush hours, but none of those articles reflect any of these.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.76.9 (talk) 23:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  N/W inclusion? 

message: New here so I don't really know what i'm doing but the service assigned list has a typo that says "in rotation with a R68" when it should be "in rotation with an R68". I have no idea how to change it myself so thought I should post here Burnside Avenue (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service assigned typo
Talk:R110A (New York City Subway car)

message: R110A (New York City Subway car) →  – There is no reason to disambiguate the page, per WP:DAB. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Route 110A does not exist. Route 110 already exists (which redirects to List of highways numbered 110), per WP:DAB the move is OK. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So someone forgot to create the redirect. The list page shows this route exists.  -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:R110B (New York City Subway car)

message: Title self-explanitory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan Railer (talk • contribs) 18:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMAGE PLEASE?!?!?!?! 

message: A few days ago, I saw some R110Bs on the barge that dumped the Redbirds. Do you suppose they would have been dumped now? Please post here if you think so or not. Thanks!--DownAirStairsConditioner (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dumped? 

message: R110B (New York City Subway car) →  – There is no reason to disambiguate the page, per WP:DAB. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:R142 (New York City Subway car)

message: Do you think that we should merge this article with the R142A article, because, like the R160's, they are very similar, so maybe we can discuss them collectively, and leave in the part with the differences between the two car types, and name the new page, R142 (New York City Subway Car).
No. R142A’s and R142’s are completely different from each other (propulsion, manufacturer, design, etc). No need for the articles to be merged if they are completely different from each other.  2600:1001:B012:5326:5CE3:67B1:CA0B:6DF8 (talk) 17:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone upload this picture found at ?
I think it would help the reader differentiate between a motor truck and a trailer truck.
Thanks.
-Fan Railer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan Railer (talk • contribs) 21:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is copyrighted. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truck Picture 

message: R142 (New York City Subway car) →  – There is no reason to disambiguate the page, per WP:DAB. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Redbird

message: See discussion at: Category talk:New York City Subway passenger equipment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobblewik (talk • contribs) 21:01, 18 September 2005‎ (UTC)
I Removed the stub designation for this page. The redbird cars were an important part of New York City Subway history but this page cannot duplicate the efforts of the indivudal cars pages. Rob110178 21:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subway cars 

message: This term is a term that I have never heard of before in my 18+ years of following NYC Transit. The appropriate term for this "train" would be Muesum Fleet of the NYC Transit Muesum. Rob110178 12:13, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Train of Many Colors

message: Should this be moved to Redbird (subway) and Redbird be made a disambiguation page?  There are already two alternate meanings at the top.RJFJR 17:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just dicovered that Redbird trains is a redirect to redbird (i.e. here).  So alternately we could make redbird a disambig and send this article's text back there and link to it.RJFJR 18:13, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just made the move.  The subway cars are at redbird trains and this is marked disambig. RJFJR 03:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Redbird (subway)?
Talk:Badge (song)

message: The chord progression for Badge is as follows
Verse
Ami D Emi7
C   Ami Bmi Ami9
So if the song was named after the chord progression it would be called:
ADECABA which reminds me of the title of a Genesis Song.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.127.181.211 (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Chord Progression = BADGE -- not!

message: Could there be a connection with Simon and Garfunkel's Bridge Over Troubled Waters?
:No. (Dsims209 12:38, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Bridge Songs 

message: As Harrison co-wrote this and then based Here Comes the Sun from it, many fans prefer Here Comes the Sun, but for me Badge is better. (Dsims209 12:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better than Here Comes the Sun? 

message: About 20 years ago, I was listening to a classic rock station, and they said that Badge is a reference to Eric Clapton's not getting an OBE while other rock stars had.  There is even a live version of Badge (which I have heard) in which Clapton sings "Where is my badge?  Where is my badge?" as the song ends.
Has anyone else heard the "urban legend" about the song's meaning?  Has anyone else heard this live version of Badge? Poldy Bloom 22:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Where is my badge?" 

message: Was it Harrison or Clapton who played the bridge on this song?  Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Sanity Inspector (talk • contribs) 01:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who played the bridge?

message: This line is not necessary:
'Despite his contribution to the song's lyrics, Ringo Starr is not credited as a co-author of "Badge." '
Starr only contributed one unrepeated line and nobody would expect a credit for that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.193.219 (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Goodbye album.PNG
Talk:Nevern

message: I don't agree that Nevern is "in" the Preselis. Near them, yes, but not in - that seems misleading. Any other views? 82.45.245.15 21:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

message: - I think the ref you deleted (Pentre Ifan) is acceptable; it is a Welsh Government site, and not commercial. Tony Holkham (Talk) 22:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The ref is fine. Sorry for removing it. What is not fine is the promo "The site is well kept, and entrance is free" I see editing since has progressed.SovalValtos (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadw not promotional 

message: Hi would anyone mind if I added some info re Cilgwyn and the connection to the present day with permaculture pioneer John Seymour?  I'm wondering whether just to insert it where Cilgwyn is mentioned or whether to make it a separate section so would appreciate thoughts from other editors.  Thanks.  Faktoj gravas (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cilgwyn
Talk:Emerson, Lake & Palmer

message: * No per WP:SUBJECTIVE and WP:ALBUMS/SOURCE and WP:NOTCONSENSUS. Dan56 (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes 

message: This is not good enough..they were ahead of their time 2600:1702:2340:9470:7103:703D:723F:1DC8 (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It`s not so much biased as unbalanced..the article seems pretty complete it just ends on this totally negative tone..a small number of critics had it in their heads that classical music is pretentious and were never able to let that go..they were always a minority but were able to sell it Anonymous8206 (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is all load of crap anyway...ELP were the most gifted rock musicians of their time..only Frank Zappa and his crew..maybe Yes had the chops they did...most of the people who are reading this hate classical music..opera is boring to them..100 years from now no one is going to care about the doors or zepplin let alone the mindless autotuned loop that`s repeated endlessly for the last 30 years..its just a question of time before someone who understands the minutia of wikipedia policy trivia fixes this article as it took a century for the world to recognize Bach..meanwhile ELP`s fan base keeps growing because they could play more than 3 chords and I assure you..no one is going to remember a handful of critics who wouldn`t know the difference between the white keys and the black on a piano Anonymous8206 (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't it The Noddmeister who had the chops??  Martinevans123 (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  bias 

message: In the first para., why are E, L & P introduced as members of other bands? Surely this is not standard.  Billsmith60 (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band members" other bands
Talk:Gravina Island

message: This is so cool.  I spent a couple of hours? trying to do links properly in order to add to the oft-repeated example of "pork" regarding Ketchikan's 'bridge to nowhere, the factoid that the proposed bridge would at least provide access to the airport which is currently served by ferry.  Then, within an hour's time, someone else added the frequency and duration of the ferry trips.  :)  Dus7 21:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would it be possible to find a better map, maybe up close, thanks guys for the page 86.45.206.90 (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better map
Talk:Mohammadzai

message: EDIT was made to incorrect references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.55.249 (talk) 20:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

message: I consistently update this page only to find my additions from the charsadda region deleted.  One of the previous authors claimed he would add a reference that the Muhammadzai’s of charsadda are not the same as those of Afghanistan.  As per se, there are many sub tribes of the Durrani clan, however, the Mohammadzai’s finally took the reigns of power from the descendants of ahmed shah baba. These Mohammadzai’s run up to the Hasthnagar valley.  
@hashtnaghar  i have updated all of the history abut hashnaghar muhammadzai u can chk
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.210.93.233 (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohammadzai and Barakzai Debate 
Talk:Aphid

message: I had no idea. Very interesting. Shit like this is why I read Wikipedia every day. Eric Cable  !  Talk  12:05, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ants farm aphids.... 

message: This had been in the article for 10 years citing this book that was published alongside a Discovery Channel show. I can't conclusively demonstrate it is incorrect, but aphids are most certainly not an important vector for blight - the wind takes care of that perfectly well. I can only presume that the author was confusing blight with potato curl which occurred in a similar era and was spread by aphids. SmartSE (talk) 23:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd tend to concur about the confusion of one disease with another; I hadn't noticed the bit about blight in this article before, it does not seem legitimate. Dyanega (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

text: Agree. This also shows why more eyes are needed at GA reviews. Would also not consider Animal Planet/Discovery Channel as a reliable source. Shyamal (talk) 01:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in the potato famine 

message: In the section on reproduction we get a thorough explanation of how aphids cope with seasonality; they breed asexually all summer, then have a sexual generation in autumn, with the eggs overwintering.
What happens near the equator, where there is no pronounced seasonality? Do they continue asexually forever? Is there a cue that causes a sexual generation? We need an expert to write a little bit more here. Dean1954 (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equatorial zone reproduction? 

message: we have one red link to Thelaxidae. Validity of this name. Possible genuses are: Glyphina and Thelaxes, IRMNG also gives a fossil one: Gondvanoaphis Wegierek & Grimaldi, 2010--Estopedist1 (talk) 18:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Where do you see this red link? There is no such link on the Aphid page. Dyanega (talk) 21:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thelaxidae, missing family?
Talk:Asian Leader

message: There is contradiction in this article, which refers to the AL as a stand-alone entity, and as "The Asian Leader Midlands Edition". Andy Mabbett 21:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Is the correct title Asian Leader or The Asian Leader? The article uses both. Andy Mabbett 21:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Ecce homo

message: The phrase and the work of Nietzsche seem unseparated enough to deserve their own pages. I propose moving Nietzsche's work to its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 
81.178.93.23 (talk) 21:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now Ecce Homo (book). Johnbod (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nietzsche 

message: The leading paragraph says "The King James Version translates the phrase into English as Behold the Man.", implying (although silently) there's no consent on the correct translation. Moreover, it doesn't give other translation (or the correct one, if there is - I cannot read Latin). Which is? --euyyn 18:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ecce means "behold, here is, voila"; homo means "man". Therefore, ecce homo means "behold the man" or "here he is, the man". Idiomatically, you might say "Voila! The man." Equally interesting is the Greek idou ho anthropos, which comes out something more like "Take a look for yourself: the man". Idou is a middle voice imperative, whereas ecce is more of an exclamatory word, not a verb. What "the KJV translates" implies is not that there is no correct translation, but rather that there are several possible correct translations, and the one picked by the KJV translator(s) was "behold the man".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.151.200 (talk) 15:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The controversy over the correct translation of Ecco homo also stems from Martin Luther's influential Protestant translation into German in the early 1500s, where he renders the phrase as a rather exuberant "Sehet, welch ein Mensch!" ("Behold, what a man this is!"). --79.193.25.4 (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  actual translation 

message: There is a full fledged disambiguation page for Ecce Homo that already includes a lot of the material in the other references section of the page. To make it consistent, I will move the redundant items to the disambig page, where they really belong. History2007 (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page

message: Ecce sponsus
Behold the bridegroom
ἰδοὺ ὁ νυμφίος (idou ho nymphios)
—Matthew 25:6 LV+DRNA28
Tobias Epos (talk) 11:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christ the Bridegroom 

message: The many photos of paintings depicting Ecce homo cannot be viewed on a phone. Captions and images overlap and only parts of the images appear. I hope the format can be changed to be visible on small screens. - - Prairieplant (talk) 03:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery not visible on a phone
Talk:Minnesang

message: Is there any particular reason why the Middle High German text in this article is represented almost exclusively by the standard alphabet of Modern English? I would imagine that nearly all browsers in use at this point in time are at least capable of rendering the special glyphs commonly found in the various forms of High German. 
If this was just an error on the part of previous editors, please say so and I will correct the article. P.MacUidhir 21:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I've put in a  move request to get Reinmar of Hagenau moved to Reinmar von Hageneau. Please have a look at Talk:Reinmar of Hagenau‎ and add your vote. --Pfold (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The way I understand the discussion there, the request is to move the article to Reinmar von Hagenau, not to Reinmar von Hageneau. I support the former, oppose the latter. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, yes --Pfold (talk) 08:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Reinmar
Talk:Edict of Restitution

message: This article is ridiculously speculative and pro-Ferdinand. For instance, Wallenstein's quote followed by "Ferdinand would have agreed." Who are we to say what Ferdinand would've agreed with or not? This is an encyclopedia. I've spent some time doing some serious study of the 30 Years War so I will do my best to help clean it up some more.
HuronKing: November 8th 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.81.147.10 (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am pretty certain it refers to the Thirty Years' War. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:50, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beechcraft Duchess

message: Hmm.. 
Not in total agreement with the text on this A/C. Many student pilots refer to the Piper Seminole as being under powered and the Beechcraft Duchess as being the more favourable kissing cousin..
J.
:I agree with this statement... I've found the Seminole to be underpowered compared to the Duchess. ChadScott 00:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft