Talk:Siege of Kut

message: How should it go in the top of the battle box? Tiquicia 01:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just Kut, To the extent the battle is remembered, "Siege of Kut" is the best known name. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nunquam Dormio (talk • contribs) 10:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kut-al-Amara or just Kut? 

message: "In a few short months, the city of Kut was reborn with a growing population of two hundred [3]."
1. I think "In a few short months" is not encyclopedialike and ugly, maybe that's just me but it's certainly not very precise.
2. According to the article the pre-siege population was around 6500. If it was reborn in 1917 with a population of 200 something big should have happened to the population, this is however not mentioned.
3. The previous sentence says 'slowly rebuild' and receiving funds for reconstructing. While this doesn't flatly contradict the last sentence it is at odds with it.
Come to think of it, last-but-one-sentence "..while those citizens who had lost family in the siege received funds for the reconstruction of their homes". Does it mean all citizens that met this criteria? Wat if a citizen lost family but their homes were intact?, wat if someone's house was destroyed but had no family? I think the sentence is vague and probably not true.
If these sentences are very well sourced they should be reworded, if not & in the meantime I think the end should be replaced by "..war torn country and Kut was slowly rebuild."
Not much I admit but also not dubious.
Pukkie (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath, last sentence. 

message: "Some of the Indian prisoners of war from Kut later came to join the Turkish Indian Volunteer Corps under the influence of Deobandis of Tehrek e Reshmi Rumal and the abject support of the German High Command." I really can't see why this should be described as "abject". I have changed "abject support" to "encouragement". Maproom (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath

message: In the whole article there is almost no mention of Halil Pasa and other Turkish commanders who defeated a superior force.  It is as if British fought the Martians.  There is not a single Turkish reference!--Murat (talk) 01:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Halil Pasa

message: its in a bad place and so will move to the right so it does not overlap the text.--XChile (talk) 21:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle Map

message: Its says here :
(copy paste)
Strength of allied troops :
31,000 	
Casualties and losses
30,000 dead or wounded
13,000 captured 
How Allies can have 31 000 men involved in fightings and 30 000 + 13 000 casualties?
89.172.66.174 (talk) 08:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question : 

message: The relief attempt of general Gorringe is called 'the first battle of Kut' and this battle is then linked to. But as the page 'first battle of Kut' redirects to the 'siege of Kut' page, when you follow the link you just end up on top of this same page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.91.175.222 (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect link 

message: Von Der Goltz was not a part of the war. He came when Kut was almost conquered by Colonel Halil. In the last days he(Goltz) was suffering from typhus and he came to Kut just so his name could be rembered as a conqueror of Kut, which he really wasn't. He didn't deserve it. 182.185.11.73 (talk) 14:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2021 

message: Porno 95.153.161.130 (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Nakhchivan 

message: Porno 95.153.161.130 (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Aghdam 

message: Porno 95.153.161.130 (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Fizuli 

message: porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation of Jalalabat  

message: Porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Yangikent (1921) 

message: PORNO 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Shahrisabs (1921) 

message: porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Karshi (1921) 

message: porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Khiva (1918) 

message: Porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Garm (1921) 

message: Porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Djizak (1921) 

message: Porno 95.153.170.28 (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Kitab (1922) 

message: porno 195.19.122.8 (talk) 11:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Koylybai-Bolat 

message: porno 195.19.122.8 (talk) 11:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of the Olkeyek River  

message: porno 195.19.122.8 (talk) 11:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  mustaf(1844)