Talk:Free (band)

message: The article says that bassist Andy Fraser is born July 3, 1952 while the article for Andy Fraser says August 7, 1952. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.149.24 (talk) 04:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a little subjective and a petty edit on your part.--kea 02:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd keep it as it was. Free were a major band of the early 70's  and set the scene for Bad Company see-bad company site, Tom Petty and the heartbreakers and many others see-tom petty site. its accurate and verified on so many web sites of artists of that period and by Free colleagues of the time such as The Who see-the who offical website--kea 02:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its the customers perception of value that matters - not always determined by the results of a google search engine. Free were exceptional exponents of the rock/blues genre. Just listen to Highway and Free Live There were many other exceptional bands at that time from the UK - Jethro Tull, TRex, Deep Purple, the Who. All of whom peaked in the 70's but each had a valid claim to 70's global popularity. The classic radio stations use of their material certainly in New Zealand attest to the tenure & statue of these impressive UK bands. The Free Anthologly has to be up there as one of the most significant collection of classic UK rock from that period.  --kea 01:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Free are considered to be one of the major rock bands of the seventies along with other luminaries such as The Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin.
Obviously something like this isn't verifiable.  But insofar as it might be, it doesn't seem to hold up.  You can find lots of "top x" lists by Googling for "rock bands of all time"; the Stones and Led Zeppelin crop up over and over again, while I've yet to find one mention of Free.  Free is not a minor band, but it's misleading to suggest they are shoulder to shoulder in profile with the two giants mentioned here.  Maybe there are other bands of roughly equal stature that could take their places here? — ciphergoth 11:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stature of Free 

message: All of the history section that I've removed is copyrighted, taken from this site. --Insist it persists 20:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: I have just done a quick tidy-up of the Paul Kossoff article, but it could use a bit more. Any helpers? Design 11:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Kossoff article

message: Should these be listed here? Free's version is itself a cover. BeastmasterGeneral 19:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed these - Free's version is a cover and doesn't sound much different from Blue Cheer's version (which was released a couple months prior). BeastmasterGeneral 19:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh.  There is not any comparison.  Free's version has a craft and art far beyond the heavy-metal motoring of Blue Cheer's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.56.58 (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Covers - The Hunter

message: "Free are still cited as one of the definitive bands of the British blues boom of the late 1960s with the release of Tons of Sobs in 1968, but this is the only album that can strictly be called blues-rock. The next album, Free, released in 1969, has a marked difference in the musicianship of the band as well as Paul Rodgers's voice."
I'm sure it's true they are cited as such, but if you're going to make such a claim, there ought to be citations added. The rest of the paragraph is solidly POV. I don't know why the author of it thinks only the first LP has the right to be called Blues-Rock. I'm absolutely certain thousands, if not millions of music listeners with any degree of knowledge of the blues would disagree with that assertion. Also, the claim that the following LP, "Free" has "marked differences" in musicianship and PR's voice reveals the writer's inexperience with differentiating between musicianship and production techniques. The band didn't really change the way it played, and PR's voice did not change all that much either. Production techniques used from one LP to the next however, did change quite a bit. So the LP's do sound quite different, but not really in musical style. If you want "proof" just look up a number of live performances by Free of songs from the second LP. 
I do think the statement "Free are still cited as one of the definitive bands of the British blues boom of the late 1960s." Can be, and probably should be added back in at some point, but if you're going to say they are "cited" then there ought to be citations.--SentientParadox (talk) 18:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing obvious POV statement in History section

message: I removed the "April 1971" and left only the year, as someone wrote to OTRS offering a source that would contradict the date since it claims they were still touring after that. Since the whole thing is unsourced anyway, I just removed the month. If someone wants to work the source in, be my guest. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of breakup 

message: I removed the link - (4) "Obsolete song title page". Tsort.info. 2007-10-08. Retrieved 2014-07-21. - as it was a dead link with no information pertaining to the song "All Right Now" nor to the song being a "massive" hit for the group. If I can find a new source that supports the claim I will replace the dead link. If someone beats me to it, thanks!THX1136 (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed dead citation source link 

message: This is a badly done "corporate" release that David Clayton has examined and will write a review for shortly.  I'd ask that we hold off until that time to post anything about it, so the details about the takes and so on can be briefly summarized. Thanks.50.111.3.17 (talk) 03:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'new' 3CD set, All Right Now-The Essential 2018 - awaiting comments-March 2018 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. On primary topic grounds. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Free (band) →  – WP:AT/WP:PRECISE multiple bands by this name. The band Have Heart performed as "Free" from 2015 to 2019; The British band existed from 1968 to 1973; The current title "(band)" should point to the disambiguation page Free -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose - Free (band) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, with an average of 1000 daily views. The average daily views of the 3 other bands currently listed on the Free disambiguation page are: Have Heart = 65, Free!! = 3, The Free = 5. IndigoBeach (talk) 17:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose - Per   - FlightTime (open channel) 17:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 August 2022 

message: Free wasn't a 'one hit wonder'. The article itself mentions 'All Right Now' and 'Wishing Well' as hits. The discography shows a number of songs that charted in the top 20 in the UK. There are 3-4 Free songs that get regular rotation on classic rock stations. To equate an influential rock band like 'Free' with Norman Greenbaum and Barry Sadler as one-hit wonders is ridiculous. Helmut Hedd (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Free was not a one-hit band in the UK, but observers in the US said otherwise. The term "one-hit wonder" is generally considered to be only one Top 40 song, but the term is defined differently by different observers, and the article List of one-hit wonders in the United States does not use pure chart statistics as inclusion criteria. Rather, that article uses WP:Reliable sources to establish each entry as a "one-hit wonder" based on whatever definition is used by the source. Free qualifies in the US under that criteria. Binksternet (talk) 16:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'observers in the US' you are citing are morons. The term one hit wonder is an artist or group that had one hit and over the longer term that hit is the only song in their catalogue that ever gets heard. Norman Greenbaum had one hit and that song -'Spirit in the Sky' - is the only Norman Greenbaum song that ever gets airplay. If Free was a one hit wonder in the US as you claim, the only song from Free that would ever get any airplay would be 'All Right Now'. That is not the case. Free is not a one hit wonder. Helmut Hedd (talk) 18:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'One Hit Wonder' designation