lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gubbio

message: Rather than cardinal Gil Alvarez De Albornoz, just Cardinal Albornoz, with one fewer distracting link: anyone who feels the need to look at an article cardinal in this connection will also, a fortiori, need to look at Albornoz; and the Albornoz article links to the article cardinal. In general, there's starting to be too many pointless links in the articles (like linking English every time it is stated what some foreign-language term is in English....) Bill 11:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Link(s) to "Cardinal Albornoz"

message: The bit: 
:A celebration like the Corsa dei Ceri is held also in Jessup, Pennsylvania. In this small town the people carry out the same festivities as the residents of Gubbio do by "racing" the three statues through the streets. This remains an important and sacred event in both towns. 
is unrelated to Gubbio and might lead the reader to think that these two places are distinctive and unique in this form of religious display; they are not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.121.100.1 (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jessup, Pennsylvania 
Talk:Bluevale Collegiate Institute

message: This article was nominated for deletion on October 19, 2005 and received a Keep result. See here for a record of the discussion. Marskell 23:50, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for Deletion

message: Just a note about the alumni names.  A few are spelled differently than on the school's official profile.  I based the spelling on what's most common in web searches, and what's used with their official page (if they have one).  --rob 13:49, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: About name spellings

message: I have removed an unsourced claim of co-presidents several times. I can find no evidence that the school has a president position, and the school board does not have a president. We don't list student positions or members of  booster clubs, parent-teacher associations or the like. Meters (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And they are not actually vice principals either. They are not on the staff list at all. See https://bci.wrdsb.ca/about/staff-list/  Meters (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  This post verifies that the co-presidents do exist. It's a student position, and of course, shouldn't be in the article. I'm just letting you know it is actually a thing. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 20:00, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co presidents
Talk:Kabwe skull

message: I support the renaming. It seems really confusing as there is no clear consensus. I have some sources listing this as Homo sapiens rhodesiensis or Homo heidelbergensis (in fact the heidelberg article shows the same skull as this one). The best way I can see to handle this is to create a page for Homo rhodesiensis, indicating the controversy. We can also keep a separate page for the fossil itself and give links to the various species it is attributed to. 
In other words Rhodesian Man, Broken Hill Skull and Broken Hill 1 will all redirect to Kabwe cranium (just info about the fossil itself.)
Homo rhodesiensis will contain most of the info from here and note the controversy and alternate species. Nowimnthing 14:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The move tag was removed, but I was just waiting to see if anyone else commented and figuring out how to make the move to a page that already exists as a redirect. I will take it up on the move board and see if an admin can go ahead and make the move. Nowimnthing 13:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Page kept at this location, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose I've read the article; and it is clearly about one skeleton, not a species.JoergenB 19:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: There is only one specimen of this species, so why have separate articles about both the species and the specimen when it could easily be collected in one article? FunkMonk (talk) 01:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I propose renaming the article Kabwe cranium. Since the term Rhodesia is currently obsolete when referring to a location. The term Kabwe cranium is more location specific, since this is the town of discovery, rather than the term Rhodesia, which is now the location of two separate countries. This would be more in line with names such as Neanderthal, which refers to the Neander Valley, or Cro-Magnon. Shambalala (talk) 18:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Limits of the Alps

message: I'm sure that nobody seriously suggests the Semmering Pass to be the outer limit of the Alps. That would mean that the Fischbacher Alpen, the Wechsel system and so on would all be their own little mountain range unconnected with the rest of the Alps. This is clearly nonsense. I don't know exactly where the Eastern limit of the Alps is (Leithagebirge? Bisamberg? Hundesheimer Berge?), but it's certainly not the Semmering. --Stemonitis 11:44, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Semmering?
Talk:Fred Hammond

message: I believe that his song "I Feel Good" is nominated in the Gospel - Christian music category -- that is from the 2012 album -- "God, Love and Romance"
I will post again after the Sunday night announcements if he should win in that category -- if another competitor wins, I will not post here that his nomination was passed over for the award
thanks for checking on what should be up-to-date in this artist - songwriter's WIKI information
timothyjshawTimothyjshaw (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred Hammond -- Grammy Nomination (ceremony is Feb. 10, 2013) -- will he win in Pre-show award segment? 
Talk:Bogger

message: A bogger is a forum where people can write their opinion. Isn´t?
:Erm, no... that would something along the lines of blogger... --Kiand 12:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

message: "eg. Fionn from Galway, a quintessential bogger who shovels pig droppings in his spare time.Like all boggers,he seems fixated with trying it on with every city bird he sees,as if in some effort to dilute the cow urine in his blood for future genations. Fionn, a male bogger in his prime can always be seen machinig birds at any time,and is willing to sink to very low levels to achieve his goal, such as placing pictures of himself as a kid in a pathetic attempt to appeal to the female motherly instinct."
This sounds like vandalism to me, so I think it's wise to delete it... Andrewharrington2003 18:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Vandalism? 

message: NOTES:
* While there are some exceptions to the Wikipedia is not a dictionary guideline, to be one of those exceptions there should be sources, rather than mere assertions. 
* In any case, there are other meanings of "bogger," than the Irish slang.
SO: Will see what can be done with with regard to sources, and then evaluate. Proofreader77 (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: FOLLOW-UP COMMENT: After researching "bogger," it's clear why there is a rule/guideline that says "Wikipedia is not a dictionary." A word has variable meaning, even within the same culture -- and certainly in the global context of English usage. If someone looks up "bogger," they should not be (authoritatively / encyclopedically) informed that it means one particular meaning out of the set of possible meanings. Those possible meanings should be in a dictionary (Wiktionary). SO: This page should probably be turned into a disambiguation page with a link to Wiktionary (and the citations moved there). This is NOT an article. Proofreader77 (talk) 04:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

text: FOLLOW-UP: Noting boggers vs chavs ... and the issue of Urban Dictionary type assertions within Wikipedia. I.E., see main topic. Proofreader77 (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not a wikipedia-fit article -- an unreferenced slang dictionary entry 

message: Page is being carefully reviewed to see if a fully sourced article can be created. To correct the wording in my recent edit summary (in which I typed Wiktionary by mistake) Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. Personal assertions of the meaning of words and phrases do not go in an encyclopedia. etc etc. But let's see what can be done, encyclopedically. Proofreader77 (talk) 19:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Follow-up: sourcing or removing
Talk:Sikorsky MH-60 Jayhawk

message: The "empty weight" figures are wrong (14500lb != 4420kg) but I don't know which figure (if either) is correct. 195.195.244.154 12:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Empty weight

message: Does anybody know of missing info from this article?  The new MH-60T upgrade is mentioned. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the HH-60Js are modified and redesignated MH-60T.  This is mentioned in the article and in Coast Guard references (ref. 5, 6). -Fnlayson (talk) 14:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The MH-60T is just the much recent upgrade. You can find USCG MH-60J mentioned in lots of DoD pages      etc --Jor70 (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I haven't seen that in my H-60 books.  Possible mistake/typo??  The M modifier is generally for special operations versions per the Tri-service designation system. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, but if was also used by the USCG since the MH-68 and with the MH-65C/D which replaced them. Also is highly strange many diff DoD organisations made the same typo. This even seems to be an operational manual  , although it is also bit confuse about distinguish between USN/USCG --Jor70 (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  No idea.  Maybe there was a MH-60 to HH-60 switch or vice versa at some point.  I'll do some digging of my own... -Fnlayson (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: Hello. I am currently available to help expand this project, if anyone wants it. Cheers
American474 (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Willing to help
Talk:Survey

message: Hi all. I am doing research for a WWI paper and noticed that even my very bad library has a copy of this publication. I think it's a news magazine (like Time or Newsweek), but I'm not sure. 
All I know about it was mostly gathered from here: http://catalog.case.edu/search~S0?/tsurvey/tsurvey/1%2C1396%2C1712%2CB/frameset&FF=tsurvey&7%2C%2C7
192.5.109.34 (talk) 03:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Survey

message: If "survey article" is described, shouldn't there be an entry for "survey class" (an introductory overview of a discipline, such as "survey of US history" or "survey of biology")?  The article could be brief, but as surveys are a core part of most college curricula (and thus a universal experience for students), the concept should warrant its own article. 165.91.65.23 ([[User talk:16--165.196.0.11 (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: new entry

message: how survey can be conducted on drug abuse
:Try SurveyMonkey. Wikipedia really can't help you with this. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 16:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation of survey report
Talk:John Stow

message: Barrett L. Beer's biography of Stow disagreees about his father's profession, making him a tallow-chandler, rather than a tailor. Beer is well-researched and recent, so I am changing the text accordingly. Please correct me if there is a better source! Bluewave 13:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: His father's profession

message: The current Oxford Dictionary of National Biography http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/26611 says he died on 5 April; the Latin inscription on the monument in St Andrew Undershaft Church say 'obiit Aetatis anno 80, die 5 Aprilis 1605'. I believe DNB takes precedence over Notable Names Database as a reliable source. I am reverting the recent change. But if someone can come up with a reliable source that discusses the date and concludes that the monument his wife set up for him in the church has the wrong date on, I'd be happy to see the article changed. John O'London (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with John O'London. The old Dictionary of National Biography (published 1898) gave the date as 6 April, and is probably the source (directly or indirectly) of that date in NNDB and elsewhere. However, the DNB has now been superseded by the ODNB (published 2004); and the evidence of the inscription (which I can't see has ever been challenged) would appear to be definitive. GrindtXX (talk) 17:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding the link to Kingsford, GrindtXX - Kingsford quotes the inscription, of course. I wonder why the old DNB said 6 April. I must have a look at the inscription sometime and see if there's any chance it's been changed. John O'London (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Kelvin Tan

message: Could someone please review the recent edits by User:137.132.3.6. Many of the user's other edits are barely sneaky vandalism, and that leads these edits to be suspect. I don't know the subject enough to know. Thanks - Taxman Talk 13:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible vandalism

message: # The personal data portion seems like it is copied from some fan site. It should be rewritten in verbose form as much as possible.
# The upcoming events portion is totally unnecessary. Remember, this is an encyclopedia article, NOT a fan site!
:Kengbeng 07:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It is rather obvious that the article is subjectively written, slanting in favour of Kelvin Tan while glossing over his negative points. Also, I'm surprised at the statement "Kelvin acted in many dramas and variety shows". Since when? A cameo appearence in 1 drama, "Dream Chasers", and 1 competition (if you can call it a variety show) "Project Superstar". I personally don't consider these many, so I have edited it away. --218.186.9.3 14:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even I, an IP address, have bothered to write down a summary after editing. Why can't those with registered nicks do so? It seems pure vandalism when people just remove my hard-worked edits... or just to irritate me out. --218.186.9.3 05:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for improvement 

message: This section is moved from article space.
This list of major achievemnts reads like a trivia section.  (I think it should be more selective.) RJFJR (talk) 13:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Achievements & Milestones
Talk:Trial of Saddam Hussein

message: I would like to see a vote on merging this with the execution of saddam hussein page, to create a Trial and Execution of Saddam Hussein page.. thanks! Crocitto49 21:56, 19 January 2007 (EST)
No, 2 different things totally!
Clearly the trial and penalty of Saddam Hussein should be combined.  But honestly who cares.  this whole article is horrible, and should be deleted.Mantion (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: This section is mostly garbage. --192.75.48.150 (talk) 17:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  International reactions 

message: What was the first hearing for? The trial began 19 October 2005, so what was the purpose of the hearing on 1 July 2004? This not mentioned anywhere in the article. howcheng  {chat} 07:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First hearing 

message: "Saddam Hussein was executed by hanging on December 30, 2006. With his death, all other charges were dropped." Am I the only person to notice the pun there, sorry to be off topic, but I wanted to point it out (part of me is saying that we shouldn't have puns in something like this, it isn't appropriate) ConconJondor talk contribs 20:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  lead section
Talk:Boolean satisfiability problem/Archive 1

message: There are two classes of high-performance algorithms for solving instances of SAT in practice:
:Well actually, there is also Stalmarck's procedure, which is very different from DPLL and from the stochastic methods. It should be mentioned, too. --zeno 10:54, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classes of algorithms for SAT
Talk:Lufia

message: I've made a few changes to the article regarding the developer and publishers. The information was taken directly from the developer's site (Neverland): Japanese (translated)--analoguedragon 13:41, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: I'm trying to polish all Lufia-related articles and one of the things I'd like to do is make an article for "List of Characters in Lufia". Should we merge the Sinistrals article into this or keep them seperate? I'd like to keep them seperate, but the article's in pretty poor shape right now and I'm not quite sure if it'd meet notability requirements. Any thoughts?
S. Luke 01:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Of Characters In Lufia 
Talk:Process algebra

message: There are some minor differences between the two terms, process calculi and process algebra. The former is often used for models more closely related to (concurrent) programming languages (there are quite some implementations around for π, join, ambient etc.). The latter is often used for models like BCCSP, PA, ACP that focus on the basic theory under concurrency. I suggest to remove the redirection. -- XudongGuan 14:04, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Notgeld

message: More Info needed on Austrian Notegeld. Enlil Ninlil 04:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

message: They were also issued in Poland in the 1910s and 1920s. I would be hard pressed to find an WP:RSref though. Zezen (talk) 23:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland
Talk:History of the English penny (1066–1154)

message: The undifferentiated title "Sudbury" is a disambiguation page, not an article about a locality; Wikipedia strongly discourages linking to the disambiguation pages rather than the articles themselves. But since I'm not hugely knowledgeable about British history, and there are three different Sudburys in England (Sudbury, Suffolk, Sudbury, London and Sudbury, Derbyshire), could somebody more familiar with the topic please correct the Sudbury link in this article to point to the correct article? Thanks. Bearcat 00:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up links to dab pages
Talk:History of the English penny (1154–1485)

message: Could we have coin weights and even images in this article - or should it link to them somewhere ? Rod57 (talk) 14:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coin weights and images 

message: It states "only one penny is known which was produced at the London mint."  While I was able to figure out that they meant specifically only one London penny is known, it might be better to state it as "only one penny is known -for- the London mint."  As there are actually a number of the pieces extant for the other two mints.  One might not come away with that impression the way it is currently written, and think that the sole London example is the sole penny for -all- of Richard III.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.34.140.110 (talk) 02:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard III 

message: A Henry III long cross penny was recently sold at auction for £648,000.  The discovery, by a detectorist in Devon, was described as: “... the most valuable single coin find in British history, [and] also the most valuable medieval English coin ever sold at auction.” This article gives quite a bit of useful information: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/24/devon-detectorist-13th-century-gold-coin-sold   148.64.28.209 (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry III coin sold at auction for £648,000
Talk:Dujail

message: Does anybody konw who Saddam was meeting with in Dujail? Banes 14:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The BBC article I read said that he was there to make speeches praising the people of the town who were fighting in the war against Iran. It was a photo op. --Zippy 06:10, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll put that in. Banes 06:14, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nintendonitis

message: (I was responsible for the recent changes but forgot to log in)
See New England Journal of Medicine Volume 322, Issue 20, 1990, Pages 1473-1474 for the first reference.
-----
Anecdotal note: we used to call this "Street Fighter Thumb" back in the day. Good ol' Street Fighter II on the SNES! --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:47, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Adolf Beck case

message: I'm doubtful about the reference to "Lord Salisbury", which is inconsistent with the later references to "Lord Willougby". In 1895 Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury was the British Prime Minister. He also had a huge bushy beard. His estates were in Hertfordshire and Dorset, while there was a real Lord Willoughby (though not "Willoughby de Wilton") who had an estate in Lincolnshire. It would have been a bold swindler indeed who chose to impersonate the prime minister, especially if he lacked the prime minister's beard. Of course if it is certain that he did so, it should be reinstated, but Lord Salisbury's status should then be mentioned. CalJW 14:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct about Lord Salisbury: I am familiar with him that is why I did not wikify him. I am also doubtful that the identity the imposter affected was indeed "Lord Salisbury" as I based it on an account of the case. I have to read another account of the case to really confirm, and sure enough, Wilhelm Meyer did identify whimself as "Lord Willoughby" to Ottilie Meissonier. I will make the necessary correction to the account. Thanks for the heads up :) RashBold 17:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The style of language in which this article is written doesn't seem suitable for Wikipedia - it's not written in an encyclopaedic manner, more as a piece of story-telling. It could do with a thorough copy-edit SP-KP 18:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Any suggestions? RashBold 22:05, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not want to engage in an edit war, but after giving due consideration to the cleanup tag that was put in this article last Oct. 20, I have decided to remove it. I have checked similar articles involving legal cases like Edith Thompson and I see no justification in having the cleanup tag put in. What really makes a great article in Wikipedia is not only writing it in a dry academic manner, but also pulling in the reader to consider the facts and making their own opinions. I have tried my very best in presenting it in an interesting and (hopefully) NPOV manner, but I thank my fellow Wikipedians for making this artcile better. RashBold 18:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the cleanup tag was too strong; I have added a more appropriate one instead SP-KP 08:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

text: *I've done a fair bit of work toward making it more encyclopedic, while hopefully maintaining a reasonable interest level.  It seems very clean to me now, though it probably needs just a little more tweaking by others who know the subject better than I do to make it as good as it could be. --edi 15:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Ramesh Gelli

message: This is specifically about a person not about the bank, the mention of which is just incidental., therefore it should remain as such.--221.134.144.67 14:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commented out the paragraph relating to controversial matters because it is, like the rest of this article, unsourced. Please reinstate only when sources are provided for all the statements therein (or modify to suit what ever sources are found). Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP and commenting out