Talk:Omotesando Hills

message: Actually, Omotesando Hills is built on a hill, so why does the article claim there is no connection? Jpatokal 08:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cause the person who wrote that stuff (me) was thinking of various ヒルズes, e.g. "Ark Hills", which is at the bottom of a hill. I suppose you could say that they all refer to hills, what with Omotesandou being at the top of one, Ark being at the bottom of one, etc. Tokyo is so hilly (or is if you have modest criteria for a hill) that there's always a hill somewhere. But this in turn seems to make the "hill" reference completely vacuous. Incidentally, it now occurs to me that ヒルズ may be a term exclusive to Mori; I can't think of a non-Mori ヒルズ. -- Hoary 09:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion of "Hillzu" is original research WP:OR. If you do not have a citation for the meaning please remove it from the page. Thank you Sparkzilla 15:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:OR talks of unpublished facts, arguments, concepts, statements, or theories, or any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material. Where's any of that? Or do you really require evidence for previous publication of the stunning aperçu that Mori's various ヒルズes have such disparate relationships to actual hills that the term just means "development"? It's just a matter of very simple observation. You may of course say that such observation is in the mind of the observer, and is therefore subjective; in addition, this particular observer could have perceptual disorders, be a liar, or even be completely insane. You could leave it, knowing that -- unlike, say, the dark side of the moon -- central Tokyo is easily accessible to a lot of WP editors, who can check this for themselves. Or you may wish to delete this stuff. Deletion could leave the innocent reader to wonder if the form of the building somehow resembles that of hills, or where the plurality of Omotesandō's hills comes from. If you think that would be an improvement to the article, go ahead and delete. -- Hoary 01:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Your new text is fine. Sparkzilla 02:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hills? 

message: :Image:Omotesandohills.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image has been removed. -- Sparkzilla talk! 10:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Omotesandohills.jpg

message: I would like to see more specifics about the shops inside, the layout, and especially about the apartments. Thanks. --70.142.48.213 (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ヒルズ