Talk:Exessive case

message: No sources sited as to where this information comes from.  I'm sure it's all true, and there is a literature section for a book... however, no sources sited in the usual manner.  Pardon me if I'm out of line here. I think this is the first time I've commented on a language page like this.  Is this the way these articles are handled in Wikipedia?  It's an ok format; just isn't the usual that I see on here as properly wikified. SadanYagci 23:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When there is no references, it should be tagged with . -- Whpq 04:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify

message: I'm sorry if I didn't understand the part correctly, but why is it that the article mentions the locative case (which in this case would be "takana", behind) and then gives an example of the separative case ("takaa", from behind)? I didn't dare change it straight away, because I really am not sure if I understood the text. At any rate that part is confusing. cnaa 11:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This may be a bit late, but I thought I should try to clear this up. The article doesn't really mention the locative case (although there's a link there for some reason), but rather the locative ('location-related') meaning of this case, as opposed to the stative ('state-related') meaning demonstrated by the example tärähtäneentä terveeksi 'from loony to sane'.  brtkrbzhnv (talk) 10:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locative -> separative? 

message: "excessive case is a grammatical case" on google search
which is the correct spelling "excessive" or "excessive" ?66.74.176.59 (talk) 19:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Googling "exessive case finnish" brings up a couple of sources about it, so it appears to be the correct spelling. Stickee (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a book on grammar that uses "exessive". Huon (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

text: With a moment's consideration of the names of the related Finnish cases 'essive', 'adessive', 'inessive', all based on the Latin root 'esse(re)' to be, rather than on 'cedere', 'ex-essive' is clearly correct. Acasson (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  sp. : exessive case article heading

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Exessive case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930033343/http://www.kotus.fi/index.phtml?s=1029 to http://www.kotus.fi/index.phtml?s=1029
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Dear fellow editors, 
The exessive is not included as a case in Fred Karlsson's grammar (2018), nor is it even mentioned there as a rare form of historical case ending. However, I found it mentioned in detail in two online sources: by Jukka K. Korpela in his ebook Handbook of Finnish (undated), and by Jaakko Anhava in his article in Studia Orientalia (2010). I would therefore propose that we consider adding these two sources into the article, thus enabling us to remove the  template.
With kind regards:
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 11:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources