lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parlophone

message: It seems that Warner's strategy to deal with regional EMI labels it acquired (i.e. "EMI Music [Insert Region]") is to rebrand them as "Parlophone Music [Insert Region]", presumably since it has the rights to the Parlophone name but not EMI (e.g. http://www.emimusic.es now redirects to http://www.parlophonemusic.es/, a website I'm almost sure didn't even exist before the split). Does anyone have a citable source to put this in the article? - Estoy Aquí (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absorption of regional EMIs  

message: When European regulators forced Universal Music to spin off certain EMI operations before it can approve UMG's acquisition of EMI, the spun off companies were operated separately as Parlophone Label Group which was sold to Warner Music Group. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parlophone Label Group 

message: Now that Parlophone is reissuing recordings first issued on other EMI labels, only artists with recordings first issued on Parlophone are to be in the artists list.  I've already deleted David Bowie and George Harrison for that reason.  John Lennon is on the list because of the posthumously released Live in New York City (John Lennon album) on Parlophone. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only artists with recordings first issued on Parlophone are to be listed here 

message: The Roster section is getting into WP:IINFO territory. Making a stand alone list would help prevent edits that simply add an artist to this list that's distracting from the main content at hand. – The Grid (talk)  12:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed 

message: I reverted  bold addition to the infobox that added some text that the distribution arrangements for Coldplay are an exception to the general rule. No doubt this is true but it bogs the infobox down in detail. If this detail really is critical to anybody except a die-hard Coldplay fan (which I doubt) then it should be added as a footnote (using ). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coldplay exception in the infobox: BRD
Talk:Larry Butler (producer)

message: The Help Desk mailing list received this email:
I represent Larry Butler, the 2 time grammy winner, and he found this website.  The article itself is factual however the picture of the gentleman associated to the article on Larry Butler is not THIS Larry Butler.  Please remove the photograh.
Can anyone help us to verify this?  User:Zoe|(talk) 16:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Larry Butler?
Talk:Lidia Ruslanova

message: Please stop. Your information is wrong. Ruslanova has been totally neglected and she received no awards after her release. She ended her life in semi-obscurity. Her only official title was Заслуженная артистка РСФСР, conferred upon her for the touring during the war. The Communist Party would never confirm any award bestowed upon this matershinnitsa. Klavdiya Shulzhenko was the first female pop singer to become People's Artist of USSR in 1970. Please read any book about either Ruslanova or Shulzhenko, and you will get the idea. The same data is contained in the "Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Great Patriotic War" (1985). So please cool off and return with proper refs but remember that recent references are frequently unreliable on such matters. --Ghirla | talk 16:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought it was known that Lidiya was considered a Zhukov supporter by Stalin? And that Stalin, rather than taking on Zhukov himself, considered too popular, decided to eliminate all people he considered would welcome a Zkukov takeover? I am preparing an article on Pyotr Leshchenko - who after the war wanted to "return" to the Soviet Union. There is a claim that it was Zhukov who saved Leshchenko from arrest when the Red Army invaded Bucharest. So, after the war, PL naively supposed that Zhukov and his entourage would help him to return - not knowing that Stalin was in fact rounding up all artists whom Zhukov had befriended and trying to get them to testify against Zhukov. Lidiya Ruslanova is also mentioned in this list.
Is all this rumour and nothing else? --[[User_talk:Pan_Gerwazy)--pgp 11:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhukov 

message: Shouldn't it be specified somewhere that she was an ethnic Mordvin (Erzya)? Also her real surname might be worth a mention. --194.72.81.141 (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity 
Talk:Maritime history of Florida

message: Anyone know whether there's a guideline for using the 1400s vs. the 15th century?
It would seem better to use the century links, unless we're referring to a specific year. --Tetraminoe 18:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date style 

message: Very good article. A couple things may help it:
# Infobox-style lists. This is one of the only times I will ever advocate lists, and it could be used to provide a brief year/history rundown for each century.
# Inline references, but I know how much of a pain those are, so I understand why that alone would be a project.
Good job! —Rob (talk) 18:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article assessment 

message: This article did not go through the current GA nomination process. Looking at the article as is, it fails on criteria 2b of the GA quality standards. Although references are provided, the citation of sources is essential for verifiability. Most Good Articles use inline citations. I would recommend that this be fixed, to reexamine the article against the GA quality standards, and to submit the article through the nomination process. --RelHistBuff 12:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA
Talk:Heathfield, East Sussex

message: This article is a complate copy of the website at ; every single word is the same. There are no references - so for example Heathfield and Waldron has its own article which I have just finished writing. Hence how I came across this one ...
I have rewritten this article Peter Shearan 16:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: 1965 or 1968?
1965 - But. The section from Polegate to Hailsham remained open until 1968. The track was actually still in place as far as Heathfield, and was worked as a long siding until a couple of weeks before the track was removed, some four months before the Polegate-Hailsham line was closed. Muchclag 21:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing date? 

message: Is there any benefit in referencing Jack Cade ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.157.190.48 (talk) 10:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack Cade 
Talk:Vector Lovers

message: * I could have sworn Vector Lovers were Australian, but Googling now to check it appears I was wrong. This is why Wikipedia is awesome. Jdcooper 16:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless all the sites you googled drew there info from this article :P Dxco 20:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian
Talk:Estoppel in English law

message: The Land Registration Act 2002 uses the phrase "estoppel of equity".  Does anybody know if this means the same thing as "Equitable Estoppel", or if it is something different? In either case, the article should be updated to include it.  JulesH 16:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estoppel of Equity 

message: I hate to be negative, but I feel that while each section seems fine, the whole thing doesn't convey what estoppel is, and how it makes sense that these little snippets fit together.
To address my own heading, this section also doesn't include the role of estoppel in landlord and tenant law. Someone should probably write something about that (me). Lawdroid (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estoppel in landlord and tenant 

message: UN Charter article 80 maintains rights obtained under the League of Nations. This is a formal codification of estoppel. Article 80, otherwise known by its authors as the Palestine clause, was supposed to maintain the rights of Jews to settle the Holy Land from the Mediterranean to the Jordan river and create a Jewish Homeland there (State of Israel). The Arabs had not been granted any political rights west of the Jordan River as they had been granted political rights east of the Jordan (Kingdom of Jordan) by Churchill in an illegal act contrary to the Palestine Mandate.
Legality, when it came to Jewish rights have never bothered the British or the UN. Arab oil was far more important.
But the principle of estoppel if it is to mean anything must be applied to Jewish rights in the name of truth, justice and peace.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.238.14 (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estoppel as per UN Charter article 80
Talk:Brooks Adams

message: is the henry brooks adams?
:I don't think so.  It looks like he was a relative. Phr 09:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From where did the user who added the part about his beliefs regarding commercial civilization get this information?
Constants (talk) 23:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  beliefs -- source? 

message: the citation is from an essay from 1998.  Brooks' biographers pointed out that proto-fascism could be a characterization, and that it would be wrong to use that label.  Brooks promoted what would become the New Deal as well as military preparedness to counter Germany and Japan in the 1920s.  Essentially, people calling Brooks a fascist are missing the point.  It's like calling Theodore Roosevelt a fascist.  Brooks wanted the US to beat its chest because the Germans and the Japanese were beating their chests.  See, Beringause's biography and Hirshfield's essay on Adams' Nationalism (I'm too lazy to get the citations myself).  Wikipedia is garbage because undiscriminating idiots read one paper out of 100 about something, and then they are off to libel historical figures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.102.72.234 (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: characterization as 'proto-fascist'
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lydia Fairchild

message: Keep the article regarding Lydia Fairchild.
*Keep it See New England Journal of Medicine article, "Disputed Maternity Leading to Identification of Tetragametic Chimerism"  
Title: "Disputed Maternity Leading to Identification of Tetragametic Chimerism"
 
Excerpt: "Chimerism, the presence of two genetically distinct cell lines in an organism, either is acquired through the infusion of allogeneic hematopoietic cells during transplantation1 or transfusion2 or is inherited. In fraternal twins, chimerism occurs by means of blood-vessel anastomoses. A less common cause of congenital chimerism — so-called tetragametic chimerism — occurs through the fertilization of two ova by two spermatozoa, followed by the fusion of the zygotes and the development of an organism with intermingled cell lines.3 Examples have been found in mice4 and other mammalian species,5,6,7 including humans.8. ."
I'm reading over the reasons for deletion, and I don't understand why comments by anonymous users and newbies were not considered in the deletion process. Especially considering how easily verifiable their claims are. Shutdown56 (talk) 22:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Neil Bauman

message: If you search Google for "FBI Cyber Terrorism Unit", YTMND.com ranks far above the FBI. Perhaps this is because there is no such thing as a "cyber terrorism unit" -- that phrase has only been used by the FBI in congressional hearings.
Neil Bauman really shouldn't make up government offices to scare kids. That could result in a severe penalty from the Ministry of Silly Walks and potential incarceration in Alcatraz for up to five years. --Tokachu 22:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FBI Cyber Terrorism Unit 

message: Merge performed per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Bauman. ViridaeTalk 00:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Template talk:Grading scheme

message: Remove bold from line . It's double bold. Other classes requested as well. Eurohunter (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 June 2023 (2) 

message: Remove bold from line  It's double bold. Other classes requested as well. Eurohunter (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 June 2023 (3) 

message: Remove bold from line  It's double bold. Other classes requested as well. Eurohunter (talk) 14:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 June 2023 (4) 

message: Remove bold from line  It's double bold. Other classes requested as well. Eurohunter (talk) 14:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 June 2023 (5)
Talk:List of software categories

message: Perhaps someone can study the Trove Software Map and come up with a better tree of genres? Alex.g 16:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm not sure that genre is the right word to use for this. The Genre article explains that it is a classification of art forms. It's something I'd think of in relation to films, music, paintings, books etc. While it could be argued that "software is art", I'm not sure anyone would!
How about category or classicifation instead? — pmcm 15:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, we should change this. "Type" or "application" seem much more appropriate than "category" or "classification". - Centrx 15:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Genre means kind, sort, or style, and is usually used in reference to art, so novels are in particular genres and maybe even computer games, but software in general is not. This list here is a list of the use or purpose of different software, and it is much clearer to say so. Why is genre better than these or similar words? - Centrx 04:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre?

message: First of all, I think this is a useful page for tagging software products. But, for one thing, it's incomplete; more about this anon.
If you perform a search of wikipedia, in hopes of finding this page, you don't get it, you get Software categories. This latter page should be merged or somehow reconciled with the current page, no?
As a matter of fact, one can't easily determine whether categories are missing, can one? If I flip to the edit view I can't see the catergories. How is the page actually constructed and maintained? How can one add categories? And where is that documented?
SewerCat (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintaining this page
Talk:Meitei Pangals

message: In re-organizing and copy-editing this article on January 11, 2005, I made a few assumptions where I could not tell the meaning of the original.  I am not sure if it is just men who wear Western attire, or women as well.  I am not certain that Allimudin Shaw was a Pangal, but I cannot think of any other reason the author would have mentioned him.  I am not certain whether all injured parties in the riot mentioned were also displaced, so I left the phrasing as "injured and displaced".  --Thunk 17:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The page Muslims of Manipur should merge with this as it is the same people group. Do I have permission to change the mentioned page to a redirect of this article? I will copy its information to the Pangal page. @Alivardi, @Fylindfotberserk UserNumber (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge and redirect. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Muslims of Manipur 

message: The "discrimination" section of the article is written only in one sided view. It has lack of neutral point of view. Volunteers may neutralize the language of the article as per Wikipedia guidelines and policies. --Haoreima (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Neutral point of view
Talk:Jan Długosz

message: I wonder if Annales seu cronicae incliti Regni Poloniae is the same book as Historiae Polonicae libri xii, now mentioned as separate positions in the article?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:06, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The same book? 

message: I've got a Latin letter by a Polish author from 1637 that refers to him as Dlugissus.  I'm not sure if this was an error on the part of the author himself or the editor of the anthology it's in, or whether that's another accepted Latin version of Długosz.  The editor himself in a footnote claims little knowledge of Długosz and refers to a Historia Polonica, so it's perfectly liable to be an editorial mistake.  I take it that the evidence for Dlugossius is from his own writings?  Tsunomaru (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Name
Talk:Coker v. Georgia

message: Other proportionality arguments.
I've deleted the following text from a recent revision of the article:
Like other arguments based on proportionality, the argument against execution for rape can be justified by an appeal to perverse incentive, in that a criminal who believes that he or she will be executed for a rape would have an incentive to murder their victim (which would not make the punishment any worse) rather than allow the victim to live, since the victim's testimony increases their chance of being arrested and convicted.
I don't disagree with this statement.  However, I don't think it belongs in a discussion of the Court's decision.  The Court's proportionality analysis has to have some relationship to what is "cruel and unusual."  The Court does not make law based on philosophical argument; rather, it defines the outer boundaries of legislative power with reference to a written constitution, in this case the text of the Eighth Amendment.  It cannot incorporate arguments, such as this philosophical argument, that have too attenuated a connection to that text.
I have added this text to the capital punishment debate article. ---Axios023 04:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, that reasoning was mentioned in Kennedy v. Louisiana, and doesn't seem to be dicta.  In determining the reach of the Eighth Amendment, I think the court has adopted the approach that it is appropriate to consider, among other things, the classical punishment rationales of deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution.  This argument is relevant under deterrence (of a more serious crime), though if this argument wasn't mentioned in the opinion or commentary, I agree its inclusion is inappropriate.24.5.194.110 (talk) 03:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of what the court will consider in the eighth amendment context as relates to the death penalty is how society generally views the death penalty. The most distinguishing case marking the beginning of the shift of public sentiment in death penalty jurisprudence is Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) which effectively vacated the death penalty in two rape cases and one murder cases, and was somewhat of a major political issue at the time, such that Coker and later cases are certainly no surprise. 72.210.102.55 (talk) 15:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Canadian Unitarian Council

message: :Brighterorange:  I'm interested to know your thoughts on the Canadian Unitarian Council article.  In Sept 2005, you tagged it for , with a comment of "yikes".  But there's no comments in the Discussion page about what specifically should be cleaned up.  What caught your eye?  
::Well, what bothered me about the article is that it mainly consists of large quoted texts "reproduced with permission." An encyclopedia article should be written from a neutral point of view (and thus not say things like "... our religious faith..."). Also, it has almost no wiki links. That's what I had in mind; sorry for not being more specific when I added the tag. Brighterorange 17:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone want to venture flushing out the "Relationship to the UUA" section?  I'm not equipped to explain the reasoning behind this restructuring.  As an encyclopaedic entry this information is glaringly absent.
JJ Bosch (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More needed on CUC separation from UUA
Talk:Floating match on card

message: Is this a real trick?  Where does one get invisible elastics?  How far does one have to be from the apparatus for the trick to work?  (Is this suitable for close up magic?)
If someone can verify this effect works then please add a description of what appears to happen to the first paragraph and leave the explanation in the second paragraph. RJFJR 17:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes this is a real trick, and a classic close-up magic effect. As such, it can be performed safely "right under a spectator's nose." The gimmick for this trick can be purchased at most magic vendors. Verdad 04:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the method from the article as it is unsourced, this is following the guidelines laid out in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Magic#Magic_Methods_and_Exposure.  If the method can be properly sourced, then it can be re-added. The material removed may be viewed here. Editors are encouraged to restore the material when they find appropriate sources, or to restore the content if the original removal of the material was in error, and to correct any errors in the method described. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method removed
Talk:Hurricane Gerda (1969)

message: Ugh, too little info, not notable enough. I vote for a merge. Hurricanehink 17:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Jdorje 17:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto. After reading the article I found not a single fact that I or any merger would need to move to the main article. Axe is ready. Then I shall sleep. -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 06:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Svenskt biografiskt handlexikon

message: I would like to propose renaming this article to "Swedish Biographical Dictionary".  The article is definitely useful and relevant, but when its title shows up in categories, it is not immediately obvious what it is for (unless of course someone speaks Swedish).  The article title should be something that most English speakers can understand.  Elonka 17:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a title of a book published a century ago. It doesn't have an English title. In addition, your proposed translation would be just as appropriate for a number of other Swedish biographical dictionaries with similar titles. The Swedish title used here is unique. This particular one is not even the main or standard "Swedish Biographical Dictionary", it just happens to be the only one that has an article on the English Wikipedia. u p p l a n d 20:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What do you think would be an appropriate English title, so that we can keep them straight?  Elonka 20:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think it is difficult to find books in other languages in categories, I suggest creating a list of encyclopedias/biographical dictionaries (or other books with foreign titles), sorted according to language/country, to complement to the categories. Translation of book titles (other than in the articles, for explanatory purposes) is out of the question, as far as I am concerned. u p p l a n d 20:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  And I am equally as adamant that having an incomprehensible-to-English-speakers article title is unacceptable in an English-language wikipedia.  :)  What about renaming it as Svenst biografiskt handlexikon (Swedish Biographical Dictionary)?   Elonka 12:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion seemed to have moved and is continued at Talk:Polish_Biographical_Dictionary.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:50, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rename proposal