lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The 23rd Psalm

message: Per WP:LOST/Episode guidelines, this page should be moved from The 23rd Psalm to The 23rd Psalm (Lost), to make it consistent with the other Lost episodes at :Category:Lost episodes.  Anyone interested in supporting or opposing this move, or who believes that a different suffix should be used (such as "(Lost episode)"), or who wishes to comment in any way, is encouraged to participate at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lost/Episode guidelines#Name suffix. --Elonka 14:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Centralized move discussion

message: By the fact that this episode was nominated for an Emmy Award, that pretty clearly makes it notable. --Elonka 23:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:The Greater Good (Lost)

message: This article has been renamed from The Greater Good to The Greater Good (Lost) as the result of a move request.
 - for consistency with other episodes of Lost as this is a common expression. Keith D (talk) 17:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that "The Greater Good" is a commonly-used expression, rather than just the title of a Lost episode, I suggest this article gets moved to The Greater Good (Lost) and The Greater Good be modified into a redirect to Greater Good.  If there are no objections I will perform this move on 2008-02-25.--  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 11:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't move the page, as The Greater Good (Lost) already exists, as a redirect to The Greater Good, so I have made a request for administrator assistance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JediLofty (talk • contribs) 10:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Support. Also Greater Good should be moved to Greater good. Cross porpoises (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - I've performed the Greater Good -> Greater good move (I could do that as it didn't require that I be an admin!).  I'm wondering if the move request should have been placed in the Uncontroversial proposals section. --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 15:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Centralized move discussion
Talk:The Hunting Party (Lost)

message: I know the band is first referenced in this episode, but should it redirect here?
:I think there's enough to warrant its own article now, including the single released on iTunes.  72.229.239.238 (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Geronimo Jackson

message: I suggest The Hunting Party should be a disambiguation page, and the this page should be moved to The Hunting Party (Lost) (which currently is a redirect to this page). The Hunting Party (movie) is a 1971 film by Don Medford, starring Gene Hackman, Oliver Reed and Candice Bergen. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.199.20.57 (talk) 08:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hunting Party (movie) 

message: Two articles on the same name.
* The Hunting Party (Dead Zone)
* The Hunting Party (2007 film)
And, there is another one movie of the same name though it writes in the above-mentioned. I think that you should make it to disambiguation page.--Enpitsu 21:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:The Other 48 Days

message: Per WP:LOST/Episode guidelines, this page should be moved from The Other 48 Days to The Other 48 Days (Lost), to make it consistent with the other Lost episodes at :Category:Lost episodes.  Anyone interested in supporting or opposing this move, or who believes that a different suffix should be used (such as "(Lost episode)"), or who wishes to comment in any way, is encouraged to participate at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lost/Episode guidelines#Name suffix. --Elonka 14:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Centralized move discussion

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:48days.jpg, found on :The Other 48 Days, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 23:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Walkabout (Lost)

message: the walkabout guy near the end tells locke that they'll send him home on "our dime" or at least that's how i heard it. 
i don't think australia has a "dime" it seems like an uncommon turn of phrase for they guy to use, 
could this be added as a mistake in the writing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.56.12 (talk) 00:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  we'll send you back on our dime 
Talk:332d Expeditionary Operations Group

message: Page merged with 332d Air Expeditionary Wing. Ndunruh (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Should this be merged with Tuskegee Airmen?
--Zegoma beach (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Tuskegee Airmen? 

message: Deleted outdated information regarding this unit's record.  Recent research has shown that bombers were confirmed shot down while under the 332d's protection.  The claim that the Tuskegee airmen shot down the first Me 262's of the war has also been shown to be quite dubious.--24.179.209.239 (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted factually inaccurate information 

message: * The problem stemmed from an editor moving this article from 332nd Fighter Group to 332d Fighter Group and no other moves are now allowed unless an admin does it. The USAF and all other credible sources have 332nd as the correct title. The editor used a "cut-and-paste" method that further complicated matters. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete this article entirely

message: The WWII section should include both the pilot and aircraft losses, which are documented in the related article on the Tuskegee Airmen under "Controversy over escort record."Starhistory22 (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII losses 

message: Text and references copied from 332nd Fighter Group to Mac Ross,  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:Australind (train)

message: Used this service just last Saturday, and got charged the same both ways despite booking a return trip in advance. Edited article accordingly. 202.72.174.120 11:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return cost 

message: The article was flagged with the Diesel multiple units of Western Australia category as it is two pronged, covering both the service and the rolling stock.
A work around would be to have a separate article for the DMUs, but based on the size of both sections and amount of duplication that would result, I am assuming this is why both were originally included on the one article. Same principal has been appilied to the Transwa AvonLink and Transwa Prospector articles.
So should the DMUs of WA category be reinstated to this article, or a stand-alone article for the DMU stock be created? Mo7838 (talk) 10:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Rolling stock categories should never be added to a rail line or rail service article. If you want to take time to create a separate article for the DMUs, feel free, but not particular necessary.--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: DMUs exist in separate gauges for a start - AvonLink and Prospector are standard gauge, Australind is narrow gauge... articles about them should be separate from services...  satusuro 12:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Also, Australind (AYC/AYD carriages and ADP/ADQ) and Prospector (WCA/WCE and WDA/WDB/WDC) have each had two very different sets of rolling stock.  All of these combinations should have their own article separate from the article about the trains they were used on.  The May/Gray book indicates that they're all notable.  For example, May/Gray has three pages about the ADP/ADQs alone. Bahnfrend (talk) 13:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling stock
Talk:Air Forces Memorial

message: In keeping with good wiki practice I'm proposing the following link to accompany the headline photo I uploaded several years ago:
http://www.wyrdlight.com/stories/airforcerunnymede.htm
Particularly while the article is a stub this page which I developed may be of interest as it shows the memorial and has associated visual materials and has certainly proved of interest to families abroad. WyrdLight (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Link 

message: I was thinking of adding this to :Category:Battle of Britain. as some BoB casualties are listed here? I hesitate because it's not BoB-specific, though? Noel (talk) 15:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Another category

message: I have removed this from the list as this has been added without citation and the named person has not (at least yet) any wiki article:
* Flight Sergeant Stanley Shaw, English, Rear-Gunner, Lancaster bomber DV-202, 44 'Rhodesia' Squadron, shot down over Peenemünde, 17-18 August 1943, aet. 31
Cloptonson (talk) 08:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed entry from list of the Memorialised
Talk:Alan Nunn May

message: Can we get a source for this:
"He died of pneumonia and pulmonary disease. A 2002 statement released after his death stated that he had no regrets about his spying activities."
Does this mean a statement written in 2002 and released in 2003 says this? 0x0077BE (talk) 07:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Death statement?

message: In the March 9, 1952 episode of the radio program "WHitehall 1212", titled, "The Case of Dr. Duncan Allen" is based on Alan Nunn May, including his being paid with bottles of whiskey (in the program, he added ginger ale to the whiskey), other basics of the investigation, and his receiving 10 years in prison.  At the time of this broadcast, he would have still be serving his sentence. Jtyroler (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slightly fictionalized recount of his case 
Talk:Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories

message: ...from article AMGOT to this one. thanks! 89.247.53.76 10:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  please add a redirect... 

message: The Gaullists seem to think so. It probably wasn't, but evidence is needed.Scott Adler 10:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Was AMGOT a plot to occupy France?
Talk:Army Group South

message: Acording to German version Heeresgruppe Süd#Unterstellte Einheiten the composition of the Group was different over time. Sk55 wiki 06:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Army Group G

message: nb: Tessin shows the Signals Regiment with Army Group G as the 606th, not the 609th. W. B. Wilson 16:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signals Regiment 
Talk:Arek Hersh

message: Does anyone have the film? My class watched it as part of Religious Studies and are to see Arek visit in November. From what I remember, he:
*was sent to a work camp as a replacement for his father and oldest brother, who escaped before being sent;
*worked with burying the bodies of those killed in the Gas vans (it should also be noted that these Jews were buried beneath a Cross);
*was moved to the Kitchens (he quotes that this saved his life);
*was sent out of a work camp back home for being too small to do work;
*fell in love with a girl at an orphanage in a Ghetto, who was gassed upon arrival with him at Auschwitz;
*jumped to the "Healthy" people line whilst the SS officers were dealing with a healthy woman who would not give up her baby.
-- OsirisV (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AREK 
Talk:Klamath River

message: A reference to a collective volume with two editors preferably needs author and chapter title for the text cited, not just general title and page no. as in earlier version of citation 25.--Felix folio secundus 20:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthur Snoke "Geological Studies" 

message: Hi,
While browsing on a different subject, I came across this interesting article in The Washington Post , going into detail about how Dick Cheney exerted power to reverse the environmental flow decision. I've put it into the text, but being new to all this editing stuff, it shows up as a link not a reference as I don't yet know how to put a reference in! If someone could teach me how to do this it would be a nice thing to do! Thanks, Mondegreen de plume (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your interest in the river and for your input. If you look at the article in edit mode, you'll see how the "cite" templates work. You can simply imitate the form of the two citations directly below that of the one you are trying to add. A more complete explanation of the templates is at WP:CIT. In this article, be sure to stick with the "cite" family rather than using the "citation" family or other formats since the "cite" family is used for all of the other refs in this article. Hope this helps. Finetooth (talk) 01:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dick Cheney 

message: Hi, some content was moved to Un-Dam the Klamath from the Salmon controversy and proposed dam removal section.
Xicanx (talk) 16:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied 

message: Hi we are working on a class project and are incorporating a lot more about the klamath basin tribes and their historical relationship with US government and agencies and modern day population and stewardship. We are going to integrate it into history and add a new section. All of our sources should be peer reviewed/reliable and our text will be cited. gcohen02 (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New subheading and new info added to History section
Talk:National CSS

message: This article and its related links are currently being reworked in conjunction with the Nomad software entry and possible new pages for VP/CSS and CP/CMS, the latter of which would segregate historical aspects of the CP/CMS story from the VM/CMS article. This work is being coordinated between User:Jayvdb and User:Spinality. If you can suggest citations or add material, particularly about the time-sharing industry and the early days of CP/CMS, please jump in. Trevor Hanson 22:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of this article

message: I don't recall any reference to Norwalk.  At least from 1969 to 1971 the headquarters was at 460 Summer Street in Stamford.C. Cerf (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters address
Talk:Coastal Pacific

message: KiwiRail have confirmed in their staff newsletter, The Express, that when the TranzCoastal returns it will be rebranded the Coastal Pacific (its original name).  I therefore propose that, following its reintroduction and rebranding on 15 August, this article be renamed to Coastal Pacific to reflect the service's new name. – Matthew25187 (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Coastal Pacific
Talk:Rashtrapati Award

message: Is this the same as the Scouting award?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rashtrapati Scout and Rajyapuraskar Scout? 

message: american state recite in 20 second 2409:4042:D89:EF8:743D:DFFF:FE00:5E90 (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  For reciting whole periodic table in 48 sexond
Talk:Katie Puckrik

message: Need to find more info. For example, as of 2005 she was still living in London. Does this make her an expatriate? There's also something about her father being a diplomat. Marasmusine 20:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Baggush Box

message: ... but in the absence of material about the box impressions are all I can offer. Keith-264 (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a few snippets 
Talk:Battle of Arakan

message: What was then battles in Arakan which took place in June 1944? Involving 14th Army and Indian Corps.--Ukas (talk) 08:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1) I can't find any source that spells it Arkan.
2) Arakan is not in India; at the time it was in Burma, now Myanmar.
3) There are perfectly good articles for Arakan Campaign 1942-1943, Arakan Campaign 1943-1944 and Arakan Campaign 1944-1945.
96.54.32.44 (talk) 05:35, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Converted into disambig page, since there was no new info. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of significantly better articles
Talk:Białystok Ghetto uprising

message: Please replace "chances" with "chance", since normal English says "no chance..." not "no chances..." 175.39.61.121 (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thank you. Maybe instead of "chance for", we could also use "chance of" or avoid using "chance" altogether. TimSmit (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 November 2022
Talk:Bizone

message: This merge tag was from November 2007 and nobody was interested until now. I've removed this, the proper article to merge this into would be Allied Occupation Zones in Germany and not West Germany IMHO. Sebastian scha. (talk) 19:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge tag

message: The article claims that the Trizone was added in 1948. This seems to be a contradiction to the part at the bottom that it was done in 1949. 
https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/Formation-of-the-Federal-Republic-of-Germany#ref297741 seems to suggest it is indeed in 1949. 
Not sure how to fix this, heck, i made an account just to highlight this. 
Can someone else fix it?
Qwartz2003 (talk) 08:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in the article?
Talk:Bombsite

message: Did a major rewrite of this article today. Added references and links. It still needs improvement but I've removed the deletion warning. If it can be knocked into shape it should be. It is a subject with a notable influence on wartime and postwar children and young people, as I believe the references support. 
--wayland (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite

message: This article only discusses the topic from the viewpoint of Great Britain and, to a lesser degree, Dresden and Vienna.  Input on the topic from conflicts other than World War II is needed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viewpoints
Talk:Mattersburg

message: Article : :hu:Nagymarton
; Corresponding English-language article : Mattersburg
; Worth doing because: no informatrion
; Originally Requested by : Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 02:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of Second World War Victoria Cross recipients

message: Sine this information is already covered on Wikipedia and the link which the page bore was broken, I redirected this to one of the other pages which does the same job--Jackyd101 05:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected

message: Should this article be moved to British VCs of World War II? UltraExactZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  18:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I fixed it - looks like the talk page was left behind when the article was moved. UltraExactZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  18:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Category talk:New Universe

message: There aren't many pages about the New Universe characters, but with newuniversal launching soon it seemed like a good opportunity to gather them up and connect them. I'd assume that - at least to start with - the same tag would be ok for any major new characters introduced as part of newuniversal? --Mrph 20:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seemed like a good idea at the time...
Talk:Cucumis anguria

message: I think Gherkin should be merged here.  See Talk:Gherkin#Merge for why.  WLU 13:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Chichijima

message: The English version needs some attention from a native English speaker. 66.9.234.201 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English version needs work 

message: There's much more in Eldridge and some of the other new cites. I was mostly just cleaning up some of the false/overstated repetition of the Spanish discovery claims for the Bonins though. — LlywelynII 11:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion
Talk:Civil Liberties Act of 1988

message: The WRA was called the War Relocation Authority.
The article is missing the distinction between the "Internment" camps managed by the Department of Justice, based on arrests by the FBI and other law enforcement, and the "Relocation" camps operated by the WRA (Dept. of Interior) from which anyone was free to leave ("relocate") into the other 44 states, outside of the Exclusion Zone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starhistory22 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pretty misleading to say that "anyone was free to leave" the WRA camps, but I will add a note distinguishing DOJ internment camps from the WRA "relocation centers." MartinaDee (talk) 19:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Internment" as distinguished from "Relocation" 

message: I think the link would should point to: https://www.congress.gov/bill/100th-congress/senate-bill/1009 since this link is from congress.gov itself and seems less likely to be modified. 98.57.109.79 (talk) 04:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure go ahead. WP:BOLD. Either that or add , which will trigger an archive bot to fix it. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #3 , link goes to page with only "Access Denied" text
Talk:Counterintelligence Corps

message: Both this page and United States Army Counterintelligence have lists of notable agents. While the lists overlap, they disagree. User:Cmacauley and I have agreed that the lists should be merged. Should the combined list be in this article, United States Army Counterintelligence, or a new "List of notable Army counterintelligence agents (United States)?" Comments are requested about the destination and the name of the list. Thanks.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk  20:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: One cannot move CIC agents to a list of Military Intelligence Corps personnel - they were in a different corps. So there may need to be two different lists if the notable agents were spread across both time periods.. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point, but some cleasnup is required. For example, Ib Melchior, who served in WW II, appears on both lists. Are they not all counterintelligence agents?--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk  14:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it not possible simply to go through both lists carefully and move each entry to the right list, possibly deleting it off the other one? Buckshot06 (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of agents
Talk:Dutch government-in-exile

message: This article is about the Dutch government-in-exile which claimed the territory of the Netherlands during the occupation German occupation. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Greetings, the wiki page on NL-govt in Exile indicates that the exile govt was housed nr Picadilly.  I have a piece of official exile government mail that has a return address on it, NL Ministry of Education, Arts & Sciences, Arlington House London SW1. Sender was Gerry Shurmann. 11 Feb 1944.  If you would like a scan of the mail piece, email me at lnadybal@exclave.info.  You might consider updating the wikipage to indicate that the NL exile govt was not housed only at the one location mentioned on the current page.   Regards Len Nadybal, Washington DC Lnadybal (talk) 15:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  , feel free to upload the scans to the Wikimedia Commons. This way anyone can see them as they're likely in the public domain. --Donald Trung (talk)  15:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Forgot my edit summary: Added citations, specified dates of events and fixed grammatical errors.BulkData (talk) 18:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Summary