lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inchcolm

message: Should Hog-Backed Stone be capitalised that way?  My understanding is that there are several, so it's not a singular proper noun (i.e. not "THE Hog-Backed Stone")? -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 21:22, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
----
Does The Green Lady still haunt the Abbey?
--Publunch 02:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation?

message: The article says: "The island was also used as a kind of prison. Amongst those interned here were, Archbishop Patrick Graham of St Andrews, along with Euphemia/Affrica (Oighrig), mother of Alexander, Lord of the Isles". However, the article on Alexander says that his mother was Mariota, Countess of Ross. I noticed that Mariota's article says her mother was Euphemia I, Countess of Ross. So something's note quite right.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euphemia or Mariota? Alexander's mother or grandmother? Someone else? 

message: The Article states " it was fortified during both World Wars to defend nearby Edinburgh", however the defences were mainly to protect the Royal Naval Dockyard at Rosyth and the Grand Fleet anchorage at Port Edgar.  The Forth Bridge was also a strategically important asset used to supply Naval bases on the Eastern and Northern Coasts of Scotland, also the port of Leith was a major asset.
The Forth Bridge during WW1, with destroyers of the Grand Fleet at anchor between Port Edgar and Rosyth Dockyards86.157.195.106 (talk) 13:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of Wartime Defences

message: The reference to Sweyn, father of Canute is probably misleading.
In Shakespeare's play the words are in the mouth of Duncan - king in the period 1034-40
Sweyn Forkbeard was long dead (1014)
Meanwhile we do have Sweyn Knutsson as King of Norway in the period 1030-5 - so there is a potential overlap.
I do not know the basis of the story - is it supposed to be real or apocryphal?
Should the Scottish King really be Malcolm II?
But the current text of this article is clearly a mismatch
Freuchie (talk) 15:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early History
Talk:Srinagarindra

message: Please consult Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Thailand-related articles)#Cast votes
Arrigo has been moving this article even though the naming issue was solved by Violetriga. Arrigo please stop your unwarranted moves on other articles without waiting for the end of a discussion, you are in violation of Wikipedia rules. thank you. Gryffindor
It was suggested that this article should be renamed Sangwal Mahidol.  The vote is shown below:
royal titles are not included in article titles 
*oppose of course they are - at33 17:40, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bwahaha. It seems that Antares is not capable of writing an article about a royal woman without stating repetitively that Her Royal Highness the Princess did whatever...  same fullness of titulary probably if her royal highness the princess went to toilet :)) 217.140.193.123 21:24, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old misc

message: Am I correct in having an impression that the text is taken from the subject's dynasty website, copyright held by someone there??? 217.140.193.123 21:24, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright problem?

message: Somebody replaced "passed away" with "died" per WP:EUPHEMISM, which is okay by me, but EUPHEMISM is the rule for Thai, when speaking of respected personages. Pawyilee (talk) 12:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  EUPHEMISM 

message: I have made some revisions in order to make this article less mystic sounding and more encyclopedia-like despite the fact, that for Thais the Royal family of Great King Rama IX. is sacrosanct - a factum which I respect because it is their culture.  -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 17:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It still has enormous problems with neutrality. --85.226.47.128 (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: This article lacks inline citations! --Abfall-Reiniger (talk) 09:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations 

message: Sewing needle??? I feel like there is a lack of context of the story behind it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tartscoffee (talk • contribs) 08:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sewing needle
Talk:Joan Smith

message: I've chosen to feature JS under the extended parenthesis as their is also a prolific romantic movelist with the same name, who might eventually be in Wikipedia herself. 
Philip Cross 21:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The link with MacShane is surprising, but apparently true, if the Daily Mailis to be believed. Smith and Wheen were married 1985-93, according to his entry in this year's Who's Who?. Philip Cross (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading 

message: The purported romantic link with Denis MacShane seems unlikely, since he's in favour of the Iraq War, and a member of the Henry Jackson cabal. btw, was JS not married to/connected with Francis Wheen? AuntFlo (talk) 11:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The link with MacShane is surprising, but apparently true, if the Daily Mailis to be believed. Smith and Wheen were married 1985-93, according to his entry in this year's Who's Who?. Philip Cross (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MacShane?

message: Discussion of the Guardian expenses article issues can be found on Talk:Denis_MacShane#Joan_Smith_Guardian_article--Shakehandsman (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardian expenses article 

message: Hi I moved this here as its uncited  and is the type of claim that really does need one, please cite and replace, thanks Off2riorob (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: O2RR, I agree. Citation found and added to the article. Philip Cross (talk) 08:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, many thanks Philip. Off2riorob (talk) 09:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited passage 

message: The WP:COI page notes: "An exception to editing an article about yourself or someone you know is made if the article contains defamation or a serious error that needs to be corrected quickly."  I believe I have identified those edits where another editor might believe a COI exists (many of those with an IP address beginning with 92.). I don't see that any attempt has been made to "promote" the subject of this article, but obviously problematic material has been removed by such user(s). I shall therefore remove the COI template.from this article. Philip Cross (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged conflict of interest

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Coles Sports and Recreation Center

message: While the line "six rooftop tennis courts that NYU refuses to fix up" made me laugh and is completely true, I was thinking that for the purposes of an encyclopedia it should be rephrased to something like "six rooftop courts currently closed due to overdue maintenance/repairs".Avman89 (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rooftop tennis courts
Talk:Heraclonas

message: Why Heracleonas? The usual recent spelling seems to be Heraclonas. Adam Bishop 21:44, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the great Wikipedia debate about whether to name Byzatine emperors by their Greek or Latinized names. Perhaps also a plot to confuse the uninitiated (presumably the intended readership on an encyclopedia).--Iacobus 00:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've been reviewing the articles on the brothers of Heraklonas, David (son of Heraclius) and Martinus (son of Heraclius). I'm not sure if I'll have the energy to review this one too but anyone doing so could probably use some of the work that has taken place at the other articles.
For now I just want to note here that the coin currently displayed in the article does not necessarily represent Heraklonas but rather Constans II. Haukur (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coinage
Talk:Structural differential

message: Why is there no picture of the blasted thing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.168.152 (talk) 02:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ... and when you put it on Wikipedia, you consent to its being copied and extensively edited.  If someone else put it here without your consent, you can request its removal. Michael Hardy 22:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

message: PSimon removed relevant References to this article. What he/she saw offending in referencing the original Korzybski book on the structural differential is beyond rational discussion. Also, the description of the structural differential is next to meaningless without the graph I was going to add. Hovewer, altercation with censors of the PSimon ilk is not worth my time. I request that this entry will be removed from Wikipedia. Principal Author - Vote for Deletion: Yes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.39.86.100 (talk • contribs) 2005-08-15 01:40:15 UTC
* Keep: I'd like to hear from PSimon why he reverted your changes... but the topic seems to me worthy of wikipedia attention... --Raistlin 10:33, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Structural differential]]
Talk:Harry M. Rosenfeld

message: If Harry M. Rosenfeld's family fled to America in 1939, then they must have been Jewish.
Anonymous173.74.57.205 (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inference 

message: Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham in her memoirs describes him as "an old-style, tough, picturesque editor, and another real hero of Watergate for us. From the outset, he thought of the story as a very big local one, seeing it as something on which the Post's local staff could distinguish itself. He controlled the story before it regularly made page one of the paper, keeping it going on the front page of the metro section." Rosenfeld's control produced, in his words, "the longest-running newspaper stories with the least amount of errors that I have ever experienced or will ever experience." 
* wikt:picaresque ?
* his / her ?
T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 04:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''picaresque''' & his / her
Talk:Shawn Crawford

message: Who is this? --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu 08:44, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there more than one athletes named Shawn Crawford? 

message: If you would be so kind to give me a biography of your early life that would be great!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.255.110.47 (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report for school
Talk:Dave Clarke (DJ)

message: 80.3.128.6 is me i forgot to login!
there is much to be expanded upon in this article, and i think it may want rewriting, a bit hard to understand in places, but the basics are there, feal free to add in any info, and correct any mistakes etc.
im surprised he wasnt already on here! Junior Aspirin 22:04, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Redaction''' 
Talk:Cainan

message: I suggest that this article will be mrged with Kenan under the article-name Kenan with a redirection to Kenan from Cainan since it is the same person with different spellings of the name.KMA "HF" N 08:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is about Canan, supposedly son of Arpachshad, son of Shen. Canan and Kenan are not the same person. Kenan is son of Enosh. Gen 5:6. Seth lived one hundred and five years, and became the father of Enosh.David (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Kenan 

message: Dear Mr IP, 
Here is your chance to clearly state why you object to my changes and which words I am supposedly dropping from which quote! There is only one quote in this article and the only thing I did was re-formatting a comment about this quote into a footnote. 
Please state your case here or cease your edit-warring. Str1977 (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dropping words from a quote
Category talk:Late Iron Age Scotland

message: Post-Roman? Is this really a suitable period? The Romans got into southern Scotland, and other parts intermittently, but isn't it a bit of an Anglocentric view which gives the Romans such a high profile in Scottish history? MacRusgail 22:08, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed (only three and a half years later... ). --Mais oui! (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Further: a bit pedantic, but is modern Scotland, year of our Lord 2009, not still "Post-Roman"? Unless they have returned, unbeknown to my good self. --Mais oui! (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well some have. They can be seen on the Royal Mile and elsewhere, turning green as they try out the Scottish notion of "pizza". --MacRusgail (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel sorry for Italians. The rest of the world has stolen the names of some of their most delicious indigenous cuisine, and labelled foul inedible stodge with said names. If you think Scottish "pizzas" are gross, you should try Swedish kebab "pizzas", with a half-raw egg in the middle, made by Persians. I kid you not. It makes the stomach churn just thinking of it. --Mais oui! (talk) 09:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Agreed - "Late Iron Age Scotland" might be more accurate. Ben MacDui 10:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A case for WP:CFD? --Mais oui! (talk) 10:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Superabundant number

message: Could someone please include text in this article that intelligent non-mathematician's will understand? Thank you!
Ok, I get 'n' but what the heck is 'm'? Weavehole (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: m is any positive integer (whole number) that is less than n. The definition says that a positive integer n is superabundant if the ratio \frac {\sigma(n)}{n} is larger for n than for any smaller positive integer. Gandalf61 (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:List of political parties in Brazil

message: After taking a look at other "party list" articles, I think a better compromise would be to remove the 'ideology' columns from the table and leave the discussion of such matters to the individual pages on the parties. As far as I know, no other article intended to merely list a country's political parties includes information on ideology.Giorgioz (talk) 14:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact actually the ideology columns in the party list are filled out with what was inserted, decided or discussed in the individual articles on the parties, so I don't see the problem and I would prefer to leave things as they are now. --Checco (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: The "Summary of parliamentary Parties" section is out of date, and by the nature of things this is likely to happen again quite soon even if someone take the trouble to update it. Since it does no more than duplicate information in Federal Senate and Chamber of Deputies (Brazil) I suggest this section is deleted (perhaps with a reference out to these other two pages). Bagunceiro (talk) 16:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Representation 

message: The party "New National Renewal Alliance" isn´t National Renewal Alliance (this was dissolved in 1979, and is listed on table "Historical"). Party "New National Renewal Alliance" (listed on table "Non-registered"), was founded in 2012, per Movimento de Recriação da Aliança Renovadora Nacional (Recreation Movement of National Renewal Alliance), as a new party, renamed to "new", still awaiting registration. See also Partidos em estabelecimento (Parties in establishing) and Lista de partidos políticos brasileiros extintos (List of extinct Brazilian political parties) PauloMSimoes (talk) 02:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New National Renewal Alliance 

message: I think that the ideology column in the currently-registered parties is important because it gives a quick snapshot of what each party stands for. This makes it more convenient for laymen when analyzing Brazil's political situation at a glance, even if a bit of accuracy must be traded off in order to achieve this.
If someone knows how to automatically extract a pre-defined segment of one article (the party's page) and transpose it to another (the table of political parties in Brazil) it would streamline the editing process, ensuring accuracy across all documents. CorruptSnowflake (talk) 00:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology column is important, actually 
Talk:Arnulf of Metz

message: Does anyone know anything about this Mellobaude descent?
To me it looks quite dubious, especially 
:Cloderic of Cologne (477 -509) married Parricide
The thing is tht Cloderic murdered his father and hence can be surnamed "Parricida" (Father-killer). It doubt it very much, that he had married a woman of that name, even if a woman of such a name would have existed (which is more than doubtful).
Str1977 22:22, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  One presumes that Parricide's father would have stepped in at some point during the naming process.  When you add the unlikelihood that a woman with such an unfortunate name should marry a man who had killed his father (the irony would be a bit too great, I think), it makes the assertion unbelievable.  Unless some pretty fine substantiating evidence appears in the next few days, I think removing the list is a reasonable response. Jwrosenzweig 08:27, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: I believe he was married while bishop.  That was then legal, I think.  Can anybody confirm this?  If so, when were the children born? Srnec 02:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Before his consecration?

message: What did he (or his relics do) that made him eligible to be a saint? Rmhermen (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was he sainted?

message: I ask because the article opens by saying 640, but elsewhere "c. 645" and "some time between 643 and 647". And the story of the third legend places his death before July 642. I have no idea what the answer is, but the article should be internally consistent. —JLundell talk  23:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like somebody just split the difference and landed on 645. Very weird. RakdosWitch (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: When did he die?

message: He is Russell Wilson’s great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather. Broncos country, lets lose 12-9. 50.4.117.105 (talk) 02:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russell Wilson
Category talk:Debating societies

message: There are debating societies that are not restricted to students, such as Cogers.  Not clear why this category is seen as for students only? Mpntod 22:44, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
:I agree that Cogers does not belong with the others. I would have renamed the cat if there had been a tool to do so. The others are a consistent set, and should be a category of their own. Septentrionalis 18:04, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put a request for renaming onto CfD Septentrionalis 18:36, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the CFD is closed, we have a clear decision that we need a category of "Debating Societies".  This is a clearly defined group used in common parlance and, personally, I'm glad we kept it.  There is a discussion as to whether we should have a sub-category of "Student debating societies".  I'd also be tempted to ask whether "Literary and debating societies" shouldn't also be a subcategory. Mpntod 22:17, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
;;;Yes, and all of these but Cogers belong in :Category:Student debating societies. Will you help? Septentrionalis 01:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mathematical models in physics

message: "An example of how geometry does not accurately represent the universe comes in the Banach-Tarski paradox which have consequences such as that a marble can be cut up into finitely many pieces and reassembled into a planet, or a telephone could be cut up and reassembled as a water lily. These transformations are not possible with real objects made of atoms, but are possible with their geometric shapes."
The Banach-Tarski paradox involves cutting an object into parts that are not Lebesgue-measurable, so it shouldn't be at all surprising that they can be recombined into objects of different sizes.
Physical objects are always Lebesgue-measurable, so the above "example" is irrelevant to the application of geometry in physics. The reason these transformations are not possible is because it's impossible to divide physical objects into non-Lebesgue measurable parts.
So you could say that the mathematical theory has "extra stuff" which does not have a physical interpretation. This is very similar to how, in recursion theory, there exists a whole theory of oracles and hypercomputation, which is irrelevant to real computers. The only part of recursion theory that can be interpreted "physically" is the part that talks about finite machines running in finite time.
The paragraph seems to be implying that geometry gives an inaccurate representation of the universe. That seems to mean that geometry return falsities. While different theories of space need different geometries, and perhaps no known geometry is "the true geometry" of space, the Banach-Tarski paradox is not an example of geometry's limitations. It is merely a mathematical truth that cannot be translated into a statement about physics (so it can neither lie nor tell the truth).
Guslacerda 04:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of women who died in childbirth

message: I suggest this article be moved to "List of famous women who died in childbirth", because the current title is misleading, and causes one to think that this is an incomplete list of all women who have died during parturition. Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 19:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: seriously, isn't this strange?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.70.212 (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 

message: To help identify many of the listed characters more quickly, I feel their year of birth should be shown as well as death. But, of course, I would still prefer listing them in the chronological order of their deaths, as they are now, as this is the important event.
Any thoughts?AlwynJPie (talk) 12:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should "Year of Birth" as well as Death be shown? 

message: Added this after reading this list: http://www.sarahwoodbury.com/life-expectancy-in-the-middle-ages/
AlwynJPie (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleanor de Braose (1226-1251) 

message: This list includes
* Emilia Wojtyła (1929), mother of Pope John Paul II.
But this page says she died of heart and kidney problems. Her Polish page says (with the help of Google Translate): "Some sources have erroneously reported that during the birth of the fourth child."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhknight (talk • contribs) 22:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emilia Wojtyła 