lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adventures of Lolo

message: Hi.  I thought it would be best to give Lolo 1 its own page as it currently is now, and make a new one with the whole Eggerland series as all aspects are nearly the same for every game.  I took a fair amount of the content from here and put it in the new Eggerland series page.  What do you think?  --Sivak 05:54, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Eggerland series page 

message: I think I will remove the release information for Japan, since this game was not actually released in Japan.  The game is actually a compilation of levels found in previously Japanese-only Eggerland titles, so there was no reason to release the game in Japan.  It is for this reason that The Adventures of Lolo 2 (U.S. and Europe) was known as The Adventures of Lolo in Japan, and The Adventures of Lolo 3 would be known as The Adventures of Lolo 2.  
:As far as proof of this goes, you can look at this Eggerland Project website, Charlie Finch's Eggerland Page, and GameFAQs. --Brahman 03:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, using these sources, I am going to update the release information. --Brahman 03:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only stage not only-japanese-games-based is the last stage (10-5). All of them are based on Eggerland - Revival of the Labyrinth (AoL take 15 stages of this) and Eggerland - Departure to Creation (Aol take 39 stages o this). --Loquo (talk) 00:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan? 
Talk:Walla Walla, Washington

message: The changes to the Demographics section  back in November (here) don't seem to be authoritative.  I beleive that the edit, and the attemtps tofix it, should be rolled back to the generic section. -Willmcw 23:49, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics

message: Would someone who knows the area well add more information about some of the geographical features of the town, e.g., the names of the brooks and canals, the kinds of soils and rocks the town was built upon, the earthquake activity it gets exposed to, the relative humidity levels (these can be added to the excellent weather table), the pollen and pollution kinds and levels, and so forth, wherever information is available? ~PSYB~ (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography needs expansion 

message: Uhh yeah, the winter is too cold and the summers are too hot and dry for anyone to want to farm mushrooms here.
Also, I removed the word "volcanic" from the description of the valley's soil, as it is not volcanic.  The soil is very fertile but is not volcanic, or actually "native," so to speak, to the area: some was blown into the area by the wind, and some was carried in by massive floods.
The soil is volcanic because of the Flood basalts  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.85.26.65 (talk) 00:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little things 

message: This article reads like a tourist guide.  Everett3 18:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please improve it then. Pfly 08:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  lame 

message: According to the Manual of Style, "Mention in popular culture" sections should not be included in WP articles. Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to remove the "Mention in popular culture" section from the main article and add it to the talk page in 1 week. Jacobko 15:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention in popular culture 

message: I think that the Agriculture part should either be renamed or the non-Agriculture parts be moved. This includes the bit about M:tG and the twinning cities thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawbladex (talk • contribs) 17:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agriculture involves M:tG? 

message: The article claims that Wallans... Walla Wallians... whatever... residents of Walla Walla coined the term, "Place so nice they named it twice.".  The author has obvious never been to New York, New York, where the term actually seems to have been coined.  Eitherway, there is no proof of claim.  I say we pitch it.
supersoulty (talk) 02:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The same person said it about both places! CodeHitchhiker (talk) 06:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms coined in Walla Walla? 

message: I am hoping someone near Walla Walla may be able to take a photograph of the sculpture Soaring Stones outside Cordiner Hall on the Whitman College campus. Thanks for your consideration. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request: ''[[Soaring Stones]]''
Talk:Beech Bottom, West Virginia

message: Beech Bottom, Wv....Small Town, Big Hearts..
A book about Beech Bottom, WV
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=1&ISBN=9781438969701&ourl=Down%2DOn%2DHill%2DStreet%2DBeech%2DBottom%2DWv%2FAndrew%2DLee%2DSmith  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.19.33.134 (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Queen Victoria Village

message: Regarding QV opening progressively from early 2004. I think I recall it opening in late 2003. I live close to the complex, and am almost sure that Safeway opened late last year. Cnwb 00:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a receipt (used as a bookmark) from the QV outlet of fried chicken franchise Oporto, dated November 2003. The complex was therefore opened in late 2003, not early 2004. Cnwb 02:28, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mathematics/Archive 2

message: I don't think I have ever seen an encyclopedia of mathematics, so I have a question about encyclopedias of mathematics.  Would the entry about elementary group theory in such an encyclopedia consist, as it does here, of a system of group theory?  Or would it just discuss such a system?  Don't get me wrong--I think we should have mathematical systems in Wikipedia.  I am asking whether there might be some other information that mathematicians might expect out of an encyclopedia, that we aren't supplying, in most cases, yet. --LMS
I'm only familiar with one Encyclopedia of Mathematics, which is a very large one translated from Russian. The entries usually contain definitions, discuss important results, and give a list of references to the literature. They certainly wouldn't have a article like elementary group theory, since any mathematician should know that anyway. (The article is probably misnamed; proofs of the most basic results in group theory would be more accurate.) Note that we have another article, mathematical group, which discusses group theory. --Zundark
"since any mathematician should know that anyway" isn't that the idea anyway, dictionaries still contain the most basic words. skukok
:WP has comprehensive definitions, but does not develop most of the most elementary theorems from them. That sort of thorough treatment belongs on Wikibooks. Charles Matthews 22:57, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedias of mathematics

message: We need more on the history of mathematics. Here is a public domain encycloepdia entry from the Jewish Encyclopedia on this subject. Maybe we can adapt some of this material into an article on the history of math. RK 15:54, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I put your suggestion on the History of mathematics in the links section. -- Ap 19:16, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: History of mathematics

message: I searched for Eric (of treasure troves/mathworld fame) in this page and the old one, and I couldn't find any references to him.  There is a link to his pages at the bottom of the article; shouldn't there be a warning there?  Or does everyone know about the events surrounding his website already?
MrJones 19:10, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: MathWorld

message: In the article, what is the purpose of the single member list (which BTW is not in standard Wikipedia form for a trivially populated list) captioned "Mathematics is Not..." ?   Is there supposed to be any difference between this presentation of information and just a simple sentence that says the same thing?  Bevo 18:32, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Mathematics is Not...

message: I was just thinking, isn't it a nice idea to have a link on the main mathematics page, to a page which is an index for the various formula pages? --Georg Muntingh 13:59, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula pages/tables
Talk:Vitellius

message: January 2, 69 is not Vitellius' first day as imperator -- that was during Galba's last days, even before Otho.  I was amazed to find through Google that this incorrect date is splashed all over the Web as Vitellius' first day; obviously this article, or its source, has been distributed widely with the error intact.
www.roman-britain.org gives Vitellius' first day as April 17, 69, which would conform with the end of Otho's reign (given as April 16 in Wiki), and so I am changing it thus unless someone has better info. --Pontifex 00:37, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
*My guess is that the the Jan. 2 date reflects when Vitellius was named imperator by his troops, which would be factually correct.  "Imperator" was a military title, not synonymous with "Caesar" or later "Augustus."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.146.101.146 (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Vitellius became imperator 

message: Vitellius was born just plain, simple Aulus Vitellius. He took the titles "Germanicus" and "Augustus" immediately upon his acclaimation as emperor. "Caesar" he refused at first because he wanted to disassociate himself with those emperors who came before him, although he adopted it too eventually. 82.44.82.167 (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germanicus 

message: Some sources claim that Vitellius bad picture in history (as reflected by this article, e.g. ' "Yet I was once your emperor," were the last and, as far as we know, the noblest words of Vitellius ') was due to a propaganda campaign vaged by Vespasian in order to justify his taking of power. I would suggest to add a sentence along this line to the article and check for 'Vespasian bias' (see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian#cite_note-21).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.253.76.185 (talk) 06:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vespasian's propaganda campaign 

message: has persisted in placing an illustration in this article with claims that ought to be discussed here first rather than in the edits. If "pretty much all historians" accept the bust as Vitellius, s/he should provide a source to support that claim. To my eye it resembles the Capitoline bust, much used in Renaissance portraiture, which is now believed to be of someone else. If he'd bother to read the Wikimedia description, the bust is said there to be of the pseudo-Vitellius type. Sweetpool50 (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a bust of the Renaissance. It can be kept in the article as it is quite famous, but should not be in the lede since we have contemporary portraits (coins). T8612 (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busts of Vitellius
Talk:Line 1 Yonge–University

message: Hello,
Just wanted to get some thoughts on re-adding the Yonge-University-Spadina name into the lead section.
I know we can't add all of the former names into it, but considering the name is still commonly used by the news (See) as well the TTC itself on its online infrastructure (note the URL https://www.ttc.ca/Subway/Yonge_University_Spadina.jsp) and when staff make announcements. I think it's worth keeping in. 
Especially with the new Spadina subway extension, it can be confusing, since people may think it is another line.
Thanks,
WildComet (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering if you were going to note the URL. I don't find a non-updated URL a good argument because renames are often done without touching the underlying web infrastructure, but your other points are convincing—I was probably a bit quick on the draw. I think we need slightly better wording, though. I don't think we need a citation to "prove that", though, as there's already a few too many citations in that lead if we consider WP:CITELEAD. Probably only the claim that it's one of the busiest subway systems in the world is likely to be challenged and so require a cite. Anyway, I'll give it a go. —Joeyconnick (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in main section 

message: Look at title SteelersDiclonious (talk) 18:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route Description needs to be fixed ASAP
Talk:Hassanal Bolkiah, Sultan of Brunei

message: Lead to find the remains of one of his majesty father sister died in the Philippines -- khalid 14 july 2006
Can we get this page reverted to its last acceptable form? -- 19:12, 20 Dec 2004 24.229.11.16
Needs changing, but what I should write about :( -- Oxba
In need of a serious cleanup operation. Wikipedia is not a place for toadying --SP-KP 01:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article on Brunei is currently listed to be improved on Wikipedia: This week's improvement drive. You can support the nomination with your vote there. --Fenice 06:36, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive

message: His Majesty Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah -- Is that a joke?! 13:37, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The government's  site shows the name, "Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah"Xpanzion 03:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: Article also needs to add in his second wife - and his third wife (not yet offically announced).
--PeterMarkSmith 05:15, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wives

message: Is he still the richest man in the world? Dont see anything past 1997 about that 129.8.135.245 18:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Richest man?

message: Is there a list of all of his children somewhere? Just saw something on TV about one of his sons, but I don't think it's the one that's mentioned. Morhange 19:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: Under the "60th Birthday" section, it says "Other celebrations includes the Sultan visiting citizens with causal wears."  I have no idea what they're talking about.  The Sultan was wearing casual clothing?  He was visiting citizens who wore casual clothing?  Can anyone make sense of this? Bricology 16:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  60th Birthday gibberish 

message: Appart from other gibberish: the car collection was (partly) sold or auctioned off after Prince Jefris misdoings surfaced. For example the sultan no longer owns six Dauer 962. I don't have and can't find a source for that right now, maybe someone else does. (I read somewhere that a book was in the making on this collection, don't know what came out of that either. Know any details?) Agentbla (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motor cars 

message: 1485-1524 : Sultan Bolkiah. Some sultans have numbers, in the western transcription, but also in the official site of the Government (sultans Jamalul Alam I and II, Omar I, II and III). If we observe, the current sultan's father was Omar III (Omar Ali Saifuddin), so can't we call him Bolkiah II ? Thank you.--Cyril-83 12:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number 

message: uses of these are outlined in the style guide: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28biographies%29#Honorific_prefixes and most should be removed from the article. Any objections?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macutty (talk • contribs) 23:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorific Prefixes... article needs clean up
Category talk:Computing stubs

message: There are a bunch of entries for ccTLD(s) (country code Top Level Domains for the internet) at the beginning of the compu-stubs list, beginning with .ac.  Is there anything that should be put in a template and added to all of these? RJFJR 16:28, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
Are articles listing what a top-level domain (i.e. .hg) really stubs?  How long should an article about an relatively unimportant country code be? Superm401 06:39, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ccTLD(s)

message: Is compu-soft-stub for programs or also for concepts about programming?  e.g. trampoline (computers) RJFJR 02:31, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
: Compu-soft-stub is only for articles about finished computer software.  Once I have finished adding this, I'm going to add a compu-prog-stub for programming related articles, which will also reduce the length of this list by a lot.  If it's still too long I might also add a compu-hard-stub for hardware articles.  As a general rule I haven't included operating systems or programming tools in software stubs, as they would probably be better served with their own stub categories.   If you want to create a compu-prog-stub template then please go ahead - I probably won't get round to it for a week or two at least! --HappyDog 09:16, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Compu-soft-stub use

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computing#Goals has some ideas for category structure. Perhaps we could model it on this? - Ta bu shi da yu 13:25, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest using the top-level heirarchy as described, and only break it down further if a particular sub-category gets overly-huge. --HappyDog 19:59, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub categories 

message: It's probably too late, but I'd just like to say that the templates named here are really unintuitive.  For example, if I'm going through recent changes, I'll usually tag stub articles; and as I'm not familiar with the breadth of stub templates, I'll usually guess at what i think it's called, and verify in "Preview".  Usually, it's pretty easy, like I'll guess Template:actor-stub or Template:comics-stub, and be right.  However Template:compu-hardware-stub and Template:compu-soft-stub is not at all intuitive, consistent, or particularly necessary; I doubt there would be any ambiguity if you called them Template:hardware-stub or Template:software-stub.  Just a thought. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 20:52, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
:The templates can be renamed, by the simple expedient of using a redirect. But ask first on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria, which is were most of these templates are discussed before being created (and probably where the current naming was discussed in the first place). --cesarb 22:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  template naming
Talk:Rocketship X-M

message: #I think the plot description is wrong: they crash, but DO transmit a warning back to Earth.
#The DVD features 1970s restoration by film enthusiast Wade Williams, which involved replacing some of the original FX shots and reshooting exterior long shots with spacesuited stand-ins. As I understand it the reshoots were shot in color and transferred to black and white just so the grain would match the original footage. Lee M 01:40, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections and Trivia 

message: Comments about hitting the eye of a mosquito and Newtonian Law should probably be reserved for the Notes section after the Plot section.  If the editor didn't like the movie, it shouldn't pepper his/her recounting of the plot.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.162.5.10 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 27 April 2006  (UTC)
:I agree. In this instance, I'd particularly like to see a source cited for the probability on "hitting the left eye of a mosquito at a range of several miles." Editorializing is inappropriate content for an encyclopedic tone. Too often there's a tendency for wikipedia contributors to write reviews (rather than encyclopedia articles) when it comes to movies, novels, music, etc. Remember: you're not here to express your opinion or make witty comments about plot holes -- do that on your 'blog. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. 66.17.118.195 16:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate the plot from the review 

message: According to an article in the first issue of Cinemagic Magazine, XM originally stood for “Expedition Moon”, but because of the film “Destination Moon”, it was decided to change locations, so XM could stand now for “Expedition Mars”. - R.G. (talk) 22:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever Cinemagic may have said, it remains that in the story their planned destination is the Moon (which is stated explicitly), and they only inadvertently end up on Mars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.102.146.203 (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  XM: Moon or Mars?
Talk:Vbulletin

message: from VfD:
Vanity page. Evil Monkey → Talk  01:51, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
* Should have been a redirect to vBulletin, which is not a vanity page. Unless there are any objections, this can probably be removed from VfD now. Fredrik | talk 02:04, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Santo Domingo

message: There is some information in the article, but it has been randomly collected, and it is questionable about the value of some of the information. Very few sections are adequately sourced. This is a start class article: 
To build the article, first decide what information should be included, and which information is unimportant (do we need a list of main streets - what is the criteria for deciding which streets to include, and what information to include?); then do research in reliable sources, and summarise the important information in appropriate sections, citing the sources used. SilkTork (talk) 11:48, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs significant improvement

message: Hi. Could someone explain to me what's going on with the population numbers? The population of Santo Domingo is definitely higher than 937,320 people, or 2.5 million in the metropolitan area. These numbers are simply untrue and similar (although not identical) to the 2010 census, which was conducted 13 years ago. The numbers reflected on this article should only be those provided by the most recent census (conducted in 2022). Any other changes provided by any other source that is not the ONE (Oficina Nacional de Estadistica) should be deemed as completely unreliable. Richarddo1442 (talk) 20:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don’t know, but I am so confused with the little tracking device 2603:6010:F104:96AE:9D01:9585:6696:F3B (talk) 03:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kpere039 (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Small Group Communication
Talk:Polyurea

message: To avoid scaring off the non-technical, the intros to chemical articles should probably focus on uses, and not composition or production.
I've reorganized as stated above. Also, the uses section could use a lot of clean up. It's essentially saying the same thing over and over again for different things. It should perhaps be organized as a section of anti-corrosion linings (listing all those uses), and a section on decorative uses, etc.
69.7.41.230 (talk) 18:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical intros 

message: The entire practical uses section comes word for word from an industry website and uses a great deal of marketing language without much substantiation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooker (talk • contribs) 14:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that, too, and removed it all. Pro crast in a tor (talk) 04:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Speaking of practical and industrial uses for polyurea, aren't there certain polyurea polymers that are used as thickening agents in synthetic lubricant greases?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.23.114 (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practical Uses 