lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:R core team

message: For the previous members, what do the dates mean?  Is that when they were members or when they left?  Not a big deal, just curious. 129.93.191.96 16:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: *Support. This isn't really good content for an encyclopedia, and a simple link can be provided on the R (programming language) page. +mwtoews 22:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[R (programming language)]]
Talk:2003 Staten Island Ferry crash

message: Is the article serious/correct in suggestion an accident apparently caused at least partially if not primarily by the pilot falling asleep at the wheel was determined to be an act of god? Nil Einne 11:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious 

message: Does this page meet the neutral POV standards here? The first few paragraphs are particularly lurid ("flesh").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.161.146 (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lurid 

message: The current map, titled "Location of St. George Ferry Terminal", is inadequate.  It shows the entire city of New York.  I suggest a closer view, showing the Staten Island terminal in relation to the harbor and the terminal on the Manhattan side.  Elsquared67 (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggest a different map
Talk:Internal security

message: I've put this in government, if you don't feel this is apropriate feel free to move it LordFenix 21:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catagorisation 

message: As it is, this article is completely unreferenced. Of course, there are numerous "Internal security" acts, such as McCarran Internal Security Act,  Malaysia's Internal Security Act , 
Thailand's Internal Security Bill , and possibly others. Are we talking about such acts in this article? Please make it clear and sourced. Otherwise, this aricle may qualify for deletion.Biophys 21:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that we have already List of intelligence agencies, List of law enforcement agencies, List of protective services, and List of secret police organizations. So, the list provided here is hardly meaningful.Biophys 21:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this original research?

message: The quote seems a little out of place, if we're generically defining IS, then such a view is a distraction.  I'm sure someone can put up a whole article on the use (or misuse) of internal security bureaus throughout history, but here it's just disjointed. Kw0134 (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noam Chomsky quote unnecessary/non-neutral?
Talk:Below the Belt (Pigface album)

message: Did anyone realise that the images on the cover give a word?
Sea, UN, Tea...
Typically Pigface.
vanbauseneick 19:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of the cover
Talk:The Nativity Story

message: This source: http://cosmos-liturgy-sex.com/2006/11/ as for the reason the Pope did not attend actually contradicts the claim that the Pope did not attend for the stated reason (because of Keisha's pregnancy). See this: http://cosmos-liturgy-sex.com/2006/11/24/breaking-news-teen-actress-playing-mary-in-the-nativity-story-is-not-a-virgin/ (article from the aforementioned source). Frail47 19:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the target audience were Christians who believe everything the words of the child inside this actress's character's womb including when He said that people aren't even supposed to look at one another lustfully outside of marriage. In any situation no matter how good the movie is the number of box-office purchasings depends heavily on the actors whether the viewers want to support them or vise versa. -Teofil Bartlomiej 23:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pope

message: Wasn't there the big scandal surrounding this film where the "virgin" got knocked up out of wedlock between the end of production and the film's premiere, thus making a laughingstock out of the whole fiasco?Varlaam (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was only a fiasco from a financial standpoint.  There are other easons for making a movie.  No one who ever portrayed Jesus, or even a biblical patriarch, claimed sainthood, or even moral superiority, to my knowledge.  Rotten Tomatoes and other industry critics are working from a perspective of intertainment and financial gain. That's one view (or two), but there are others.  rags (talk) 22:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: I have tagged this section for OR and removed 2 of the 5 claims. Each was referenced only to the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia, and unsurprisingly the references did not mention this 2006 film - so WP:SYNTHESIS - nor did they in fact contain the assertions the text would suggest. I just removed two claims as wrong in terms of Catholic doctrine. Frankly I think the whole section could go. Johnbod (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree. I removed it. --80.219.252.246 (talk) 12:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research in "Questions of historical and biblical accuracy"
Talk:Negotiable order of withdrawal account

message: The article says, "Today, the prohibition on interest on checking accounts has been removed."  I'm not so sure about that, especially when it comes to small businesses.  Certainly "Interest Checking" accounts are available, but do we know if it's a workaround -- like a NOW account -- or if it's the real thing?  And does the same thing apply for both sole proprietorships and small business employers? 199.244.214.30 16:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. From  Regulation Q, "No member bank of the Federal Reserve System shall, directly or indirectly, by any device whatsoever, pay any interest on any demand deposit." It appears that only NOW accounts can pay interest, and there are still limitations on who is eligible to hold such an account. Mrwhizzard 21:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the offending statement. Mrwhizzard 22:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As it is worded and punctuated, an opening sentence in this article is WORD SALAD.  Look at the comma (,) between regulations and define:
: "While a negotiable order of withdrawal is essentially identical to a check drawn on a demand deposit account, US banking regulations, define the terms "demand deposit account" and "negotiable order of withdrawal account" separately, and until July 2011 Regulation Q stated that a demand deposit could not pay interest."
Should this not read:
: "While a negotiable order of withdrawal is essentially identical to a check drawn on a demand deposit account, US banking regulations define the terms "demand deposit account" and "negotiable order of withdrawal account" separately, and until July 2011 Regulation Q stated that a demand deposit could not pay interest. NOW accounts were structured to comply with Regulation Q." [Emphasis mine.]
Should not the comma (,) between regulations and define be deleted?
(EnochBethany (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Duoduoduo (talk) 15:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Punctuation error

message: The article claims:
:"a Negotiable Order of Withdrawal account (NOW account) is a deposit account that pays interest, on which an unlimited number of checks may be written.  …until July 2011, Regulation Q stated that a demand deposit could not pay interest. NOW accounts were structured to comply with Regulation Q."
I had a checking account at my Credit Union which paid interest (& still does) and was never limited in the number of checks I could write.  However, the interest for most of this time was so little & overcome by service fees often, so that it was just an annoyance at Income Tax time.  Perhaps I am confused. (EnochBethany (talk) 05:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like your account is a NOW account.  Duoduoduo (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense?

message: what they  stealing  from  me 2600:1700:6C37:4800:2DE7:D45E:BD5E:695F (talk) 04:39, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  map platforms
Talk:QFT

message: hhmmm..? 77.125.90.238 (talk) 00:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  in toto? what is that? 

message: While there may be may ways to include the 'F' word in common English, and the Wikipedia, is no exception to the 'Rules', some people use them quite frequently, others do not. So for brevity and not to trip the sensitivities of those who seek the answers to common questions, I have replaced the 'uc' in certain words with the '**' designation. 
While it may offend some to put the '**', In my Opinion Only, IF those who are learning, then they should already know that there are certain words of the English language, and certain combinations that are frowned upon by our culture. these of course include George Carlin's famous seven words  that cannot be said on Television in the USA, for fear of the regulator's (the US FCC) removal of permission of the Broadcaster to continue operations. [1]
Responsible-Richard-NQW (talk) 20:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored, so I've restored the correct spelling of the word 'fuck' to this page.  While those famous seven words cannot be said on US television, all of them are the subjects of Wikipedia articles. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Clearly different people have very different views on this, but Wikipedia's policy is unambiguous: Wikipedia is not censored. No one of us has the right to unilaterally overturn this policy, no matter what our personal feelings on the issue. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

text: No big deal; Wikipedia has lots of rules, and we were all new once. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:18, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Common Words to describe an Acronym
Wikipedia talk:Special:Upload

message: Help_talk:Special page says I'm supposed to bring this here, so I'm starting a new page. If this is no longer the way things are done, someone will hopefully let me know (Special pages are a particular breed of arcane on WP).
The licensing dropdown on Special:Upload really needs to be reorganized so that the invalid licenses are not first on the list! I'm sure we get all kinds of false positives categorized into CAT:CSD because people don't look further down the page than "allowable for non-commercial use". People who want to apply false tags to abuse the system/hide their copyvio will do so anyway (in my opinion); we should be making it easier for users to license their materials properly, not trick them with a "gotcha" system. We never get the chance to educate some of these users because they either a) upload and never check the image page to see the big splash template, or b) see their page get deleted, think our servers are buggy/we're being unfair to their image, and leave. See also Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Why the boobytraps? for an earlier discussion. -- nae'blis 17:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Same as the subject matter above Theofavour (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upload my biography
Talk:TA-082

message: Damnright!! I have dev, and HENC and can mount ISOs and run homebrew!! If any1 needs help bypassing the TA-082 please email me: gamesharkmike@yahoo.caRealg187 18:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear theve cracked the TA-082!! U can downgrade and run hacked firmware!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Realg187 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: see: http://forums.maxconsole.net/showthread.php?t=41039 RealG187 18:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TA-082 Doesnt stop me!!
Talk:Paul Mellon

message: This is a good entry masked as a poor one for lack of footnotes. It might do well with some ruthless edits.68.173.91.55 (talk) 07:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of footnotes

message: The redirect Mellon collection has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mellon collection]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Kalamazoo

message: The reports of sex abuse do not violate this policy, as they neutral, verified with sources, and not directly plagiarizing the exact words.JoeScarce (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The BLP policy is a lame excuse to censor sex abuse

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:.gg

message: Search Engine DuckDuckGo uses ddg.gg as its shorthand URL. Example: http://ddg.gg/?q=.gg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yura87 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intrusion
File talk:Graph top7 def expd 1930-38.png

message: During the 1930's Japan used an extraordinary amount of deficit spending on military arms, are you sure this graph is truly representative of this spending? I'm not sure how Japan's military funds during this period should be classified(as either defensive or offensive) and if they have a place on this graph, but if we're classifying Germany's military funds as "defense funds" some attention should be brought to the "defense funds" that Japan used to fuel their fight in the Pacific theatre. TheKaramanukian (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Grasz czy nie grasz

message: Trzeba to zaaukualizować (zmieniono kwoty). Wojti, from Polish.
Erm... Krzysztof Ibisz was NEVER host of this show! Adasiekkk, from Poland of course :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.89.170.12 (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Give As You Earn

message: It's possible this program only exists in the UK, but when I came to it it referenced "60p" and pounds without distinction for where it was operating. Can anyone help, or should we just redirect this to Charities Aid Foundation and call it a day? -- nae'blis 17:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: UK tax hasn't included a 60% rate for a couple of decades, but I think this is just a fork of payroll giving and suggest a redirect. ϢereSpielChequers 23:11, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Greek battleship Kilkis

message: Please use your common sense. Battleship Kilkis does not belong to Wikiproject Mississippi. Normally a ship is not related to a country, state or city just because she is named after it, unless there is some additional connection. However, if you really need this ship added, tagging article USS Mississippi (BB-23) is enough. Sv1xv (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been resolved (probably) at the Administrators' noticeboard. Constantine   �?  11:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it hasn't been resolved. I just got tired of repeating the obvious. If a project decides something is within its scope, then it can be tagged as such. The ship was named after the state of Mississippi, to honor the state. Just because it was sold to Greece, doesn't make it any less significant to the project. The tag should be on this article and eventually, I will add it back. Project tags aren't the same thing as article content. This article is within the scope of the project, period. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 11:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  You seem to forget that when she was sold, she was renamed Kilkis, after the location of a battle of the Second Balkan War. What connection would it have to the State of Mississippi? Should it be added to a project about the Balkan Wars as well? Please use common sense. Sv1xv (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

text: ...surely, then, it's appropriate to tag USS Mississippi (BB-23), rather than Greek battleship Kilkis? We have two articles so we can easily deal with the different aspects of the ship's career, and this seems quite a classic example of it. Shimgray | talk | 12:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of course. There is some connection while in US Navy service to the State of Mississippi: "The ship departed Cuban waters on 1 May (1909) for a cruise up the river with which she shared her name, the mighty Mississippi River. Calling at the major ports of this great inland waterway, she arrived at Natchez, Mississippi on 20 May, and then proceeded five days later to Horn Island where she received a silver service from the state of Mississippi." It is acceptable, although somewhat extreme, to tag USS Mississippi (BB-23). Sv1xv (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As can be seen in the images at the USS Mississippi BB-23 article, her figurehead, 100 years later, is still on display on the grounds of the Mississippi State Capital building. Regardless of her name, she is tied to Mississippi, both as USS Mississippi and as Kilkis. Just because she was sold to another country and changed names, doesn't wipe out her connection to Mississippi, and therefore her being in the WikiProject Mississippi scope under any name. It appears I am not the one that is not using common sense. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 14:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Mississippi 
Talk:Greek cruiser Elli (1912)

message: Did the Italian government admit responsibility for the attack? What was the motive for it? Drutt (talk) 17:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This source suggests that it was to punish the Greeks for being pro-British. Drutt (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Mussolini always claimed in his discussions with Ciano and his generals that he would attack Greece because it was following an anglophile course; and in truth, Greece was doing so. The main reason however is that Musso simply wanted to expand his empire, and in July-August 1940, he had began preparing the ground for an attack against Yugoslavia or Greece, although it was postponed due to German pressure and other reasons (Musso expected the Germans to invade Britain in September- to October. As to the submarine attack on Elli, IIRC it was ordered by Cesare Maria De Vecchi, the then-governor of the Dodecanese, who was fervently anti-Greek and supported a war against Greece. It was not the only such incident during the summer of 1940: Italian planes bombed Greek destroyers on 12 July, for instance. These attacks were provocation mostly, mixed with attempts at intimidation. The attack against Elli was probably due to De Vecchi's over-eagerness. AFAIK, the Italians have never officially admitted the attack. At least until the 1970s, even semi-official sources claimed ignorance as to the identity of the sub. Constantine   ✍  18:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

text: There is more information on the affair here. Drutt (talk) 14:34, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Motive

message: this ship has steam turbines so the right classification is light cruiser, like the british Bristol class  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.238.234.17 (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: on the classification
Talk:McKee Botanical Garden

message: As with zoos, etc., is it really appropriate to catalogue the entire holdings?  Rklawton 02:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grew Up a Screw Up

message: Who produced this? The beat seems very kfngkhobhcvblhblihlvcbc.jbklgb lkmbkjhbvcjbkbfxbfg
I'm gonna assume the Runners, but I don't actually know. (Rishi B 06:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed the lyrics section, about the ashy to classy thing relating to Slim Thugg and T.I.... it was quite a stretch, and it's a fairly common phrase, coined by the late Notorious B.I.G., who is in-coincadentally sampled in the song. I think Ludacris paying homage clearly more logical than what was assumed in this section. (Rishi B 06:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics
Talk:Carlos Alomar

message: The Wikipedia article on Earl Slick says he played on Station To Station (and specifically the song Stay), but here it says it was Alomar. Can anyone check this? Ta.Manormadman (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kingston Wall

message: In addition to needing sections, this article suffers from POV praise of the band and other unsourced statements, such as:
*"Perhaps even the band name was partially formed out of Walli's surname." (speculation?)
*"Petri Walli said in an interview that it was probably the most expensive self-financed album made ever made in Finland"
*"Ior Bock, a man Petri Walli knew well and most likely got to know him during his trips to Goa, India"
*"All the original Kingston Wall albums and singles under the Trinity label have been since sold out and became precious collector's items"
*"he jumped to his death from the tower of Töölö church in central Helsinki"
are subject to verification and require sources to remain in this article.
*"unique, hard-edged acid-rock"
*"top-notch Finnish artists"
*"Kingston Wall was well known from their outstanding live performances"
*"the group is considered even by many Finns as one of the country's best hard rock groups"
are POV statements, and should most likely be removed, otherwise backed up with reliable sources.
That being said, there is an impressive amount of information here. I look forward to seeing this article in its neutral and well-sourced form. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 23:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to make the article a bit more npov. Also removed unnecesary information. I removed the tone tag. Feel free to add it again if the tone is still not correct. --Petska (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup required
Talk:Victoria Baths

message: Is there any reason why no mention is made of the Baths' location in Chorlton-on-Medlock?
: - Agreed, it's on the edge of Chorlton-upon-Medlock, but it is still in CoM. Weird. Fixed. pomegranate (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Byzantine civilisation in the 12th century

message: Each dynasty under the Byzantine Empire has its own article, and therefore this article would fit in nicely as merged material with Byzantium under the Komnenoi. I would hope this is agreeable... Monsieurdl mon talk 18:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging this article