Talk:Exclusive (album)

message: Please do not change anything on the page unless you have sources. All information has been took from MTV or Sony. It is all confirmed. Any questions, please discuss them here.
P.S. do not edit the song lengths, as they were confirmed by SonyBMG.de. Even if the song has leaked, don't change it, the leak versions may not be official.
Thank you.--FSX-2007 20:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 28th, 7007 

message: I have sourced the new release date and the only two tracks confirmed.
wall 2 wall
kiss kiss
take you down 
throw'd
will definately be on the albulm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.138.154 (talk) 05:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: The tracks have been sourced. They should sta there until an official track listing appears. FSX-2007 19:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourced 

message: Is there anyway to protect ths article form being changed. I'm getting real tired of changing things (untrue things) that guests come and put on here. They don't even say why. For example, there is no song called "Prom Date," or "Prince and Princess," or even "Real Throwback." Nor do they feature Rihanna, Jo Jo, or Fabolous. 
THOSE SONGS DO NOT EXIST!
All information on the article is all official as of now, and it is all sourced if you look and pay attention. For other user and guest, if you feel the need to change something on the article, post it in here, other wise, it will be reverted.
--FSX-2007 22:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please quit adding this track list from TRL. See WP:BALL, if the tracks aren't confirmed you do not list. I really shouldn't even include in the article the next single is "Kiss Kiss" just because he mentioned it on 106 & Park because there is no source, just hearsay or dependence on a person's judgment. Also if you don't quit adding the non-sourced information I will report you for vandalism. --Ayoleftyz 14:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  protection 

message: How do we know these are leftover tracks? --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 23:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because all of them (or snippets) have leaked out on the internet, and they are not on the album. All but "Fallen Angel" have been leaked, but we know it was to be on the album also, because he confirmed so on his official myspace.--FSX-2007 19:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leftover Tracks 

message: I just added a new review from TMM.com. I also deleted TheDailyYo! review because it's a blog and also DJBooth.net review because it's an average of people who voted, or I can make my own review "Ang3lus 3/5"... And last thing: I did put in alphabetical order :) --Ang3lus 17:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: :Image:ChirsBrownExclusiveBonusDVDBET.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ChirsBrownExclusiveBonusDVDBET.jpg

message: The first reference doesn't lead to anything. I viewed the editing page and the only text there is Shaheem Reid (July 7 2007).
Can someone find the reference and fix it? DiverseMentality (talk) 20:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: "Fallen Angel" (5:34) on the UK / Japanese standard edition is not Japan-only, I am in the UK and it is on there. The section "UK / Japanese Edition bonus tracks" should be renamed to reflect the fact that it is for the standard edition.
However, although "Fallen Angel" (5:34) is on the UK / Japanese standard edition, it is not on the UK / Japanese Forever Edition as incorrectly stated. This needs to be corrected to "Fallen Angel - International Edit" (4:00), the version featured on there which fades out the outro. The section "UK / Japanese CD Edition" should be renamed to reflect the fact that it is for The Forever Edition.
--81.156.119.0 (talk) 10:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallen Angel 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Exclusive (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/17078333/review/17139273/exclusive
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421214944/http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=1226 to http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=1226
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430234208/http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/74345/week-ending-march-20-2011-songs-the-chris-brown-matter/ to http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/74345/week-ending-march-20-2011-songs-the-chris-brown-matter/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Exclusive (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/17078333/review/17139273/exclusive
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421214944/http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=1226 to http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=1226
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080210013037/http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2007/11/this-weeks-revi.html to http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2007/11/this-weeks-revi.html
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/657nsO5ho?url=http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart-watch/week-ending-march-20-2011-songs-the-chris-brown-matter.html to http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/74345/week-ending-march-20-2011-songs-the-chris-brown-matter/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a pattern of blatant vandalism and cherrypicking on this article whereby conseriable sourced content is being removed without justification or any sound explination. Moreover, cherrypicking is being done to selectively highlight only negative reception, thereby violating WP:NPOV. It's quite sad to see this kind of editorial biased, which is consistent with the editorial bias present on other album articles of said artist. Failure to provide justification for all these changes on this talk page will result in the article being reverted to its prior state before the vandalism occured.Instantwatym (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening discussion on vandalism, cherrypicking and editorial bias on this article