lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:King of Rock and Roll

message: I changed a couple instances of "Elvis" to "Presley" in the belief that this conforms with encyclopedic style.  This might be a special case though, since Elvis was well-known under simply his first name.  I checked the Elvis Presley article to see if there's any preference there, but there is no consistent convention.  (It uses "Presley", "Elvis", and "Elvis Presley" interchangeably.)  Is there an agreed-upon convention for Elvis's name in Wikipedia?  Honestly, I didn't want to shift through the entire Presley discussion haystack to find that needle, so I decided to go with his last name simply to make it consistent with references to Chuck Berry as "Berry" in this article.--Mbennardo 17:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The EP article now consistently features "Presley".Rikstar 12:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name changed 

message: This article is absolutely atrocious, vastly POV, beyond anything anyone can expect Wikipedia to handle, and should've been automatically deleted on the day that it was created.UberCryxic 03:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What the????

message: If you delete this article (which I heartily endorse), please replace it with a Redirect to Honorific titles in popular music#King of Rock and Roll.  The rationale is discussed in my comments on the deletion discussion for that page.  Thanks. --Eliyahu S Talk 13:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  If deleted, please Redirect 

message: I am not happy with the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#King of Rock and Roll. I welcome editors to form a consensus here instead. Neel.arunabh (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you feel might be changed about this redirect in particular? -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, see what google search results give on the first page
   
  
   
  
  
   
Neel.arunabh (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect targets
Talk:Beyond Rangoon

message: All of my searches for "Laura Bowman" just turn up reviews of the movie. Apart from the 8888 Uprising itself, is any aspect of this movie actually true? It seems odd that the protagonist of a major motion picture "based on a true story" doesn't seem to have any existence outside of the film. 70.20.171.242 (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "True Story"?
Talk:Lou and Andy

message: "Lou and Andy have appeared in every single Little Britain episode to date (including the Comic Relief Special). They did not, however, appear in the show's pilot episode."
That's the kind of sense we need. --213.40.131.66 17:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At Wikipedia, we encourage all users, including anonymous IPs, to be bold in updating pages! If you think something needs changing in an article, you can change it yourself!
Cheers — G<B>a</B>ry Kirk | talk! 18:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed the references to deleted scenes, as they seemed unnecessary. I don't know if anyone will object, but I thought I should mention it here just in case.-Boatmanax
:If the references were notable and important they should have been left in.  I'll check the history and salvage whatever should be here.  However, it may take a while since you have not dated your comment,  Jubilee♫clipman 22:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted scenes 

message: You can earn a lot of money looking after disabled people. Disability living allowance (which Andy would get). Care worker's benefit (or somesuch, can't remember the name exactly) could possibly be given to Lou for his role. There's really no 'continuity' error there and the speculation is pretty close to original research anyway.Xzamuel 03:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The money 'question'... 

message: This article is too excessive in its use of lists.  Wikis only need a few notable examples to help readers get a flavour of the fictional characters' behaviour patterns. If they want a blow by blow account of every scene they can go to a fan site with episode guides - or even just watch the episodes.  Since others have commented on this, and since it is now tagged, I will strip this article down to the bare minimum.  Jubilee♫clipman 22:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've cut the lists down and tried to make the remaining examples relevent.  I wasn't sure what to do with the deleted scenes so I left them in list form under the relevent section which looks fine.  Most are referenced. Anyone else want to pare this down further be my guest!Jubilee♫clipman 23:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the header looks is if it needs work as it is not that well written and doesn't really introduce the charcters properly, despite its length... Tomorrow, methinks!  Jubilee♫clipman 00:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List after list...

message: Should it be mentioned on the page that Lou and Andy are based on Fry and Laurie characters? (as seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqYGzQkMTLk)
Kansaikiwi (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration 

message: This section is tagged as possibly containing original research as far back as May 2011 - surely this is long overdue for either removing the original research or adding WP:RS? Autarch (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material in section "Andy's behaviour"
Talk:The Wizard of Oz (1993 video game)

message: So is this game based on the film or the book? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 18:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: This article needs to be cleaned up -- there are run-on sentences and parentheticals within parentheticals.
I also suggest adding in why the AVGN disliked the game -- it has really awful hit detection (you can jump through platforms instead of landing on them) or virtually no weapons.
71.234.109.192 (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammar 

message: A lot of the character descriptions seem to be taken from this FAQ on GameFAQs: http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/file/588855/37181  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.191.143.7 (talk) 00:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Noel Swaranjit Sen

message: This article is based on a single source, highly critical newspaper report. It clearly very biased, giving no biographic details about the person who is the current DGP of AP. --hydkat 18:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not NPOV... 

message: First off, its true that he is. Secondly, being the head of multiple Christian organizations is tantamount to self-identification. He also appears to be the head of the Christian Chamber of commerce .Pectoretalk 12:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: christian
Talk:Kamiakin High School

message: I would have expected one of KHS's students to write a bio of their namesake, since the HS has an article.  Kamiakin is a significant figure in Native American history as well as that of the Oregon Country/Washington Territory.  I might write the bio myself, although I'm from "the other side of the line" (that other country north from you) and don't know so much about the Yakima War; there might need to be a Kamiakin disambig page, too, as I think there are other places/things named after him.Skookum1 18:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started a stub article... and it really is quite stubby.  Making Chief Kamiakin article more full would be an excellent class project!  Please do consider. CJLippert 19:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've been beefing up the Chief Kamiakin article for some time, but there are a lot of other sources that could result in a very lengthy and interesting biography. Come on Kamiakin students! Get to work! -- Quartermaster (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  We're not really the "working" type. 66.189.177.28 (talk) 05:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kamiakin]] redirect should be separate article
Talk:KDPS

message: The information listed in the infobox for "First Air date" and "Former Callsigns" is inaccurate. KDPS first went on the air well before June 24 2005 and was never known as DKDPS for any extended period of time. This information was probably misleadingly (or automatically) acquired from an FCC database, which may have listed this information for the station when it was temporarilly unlicensed at around that point in time.
Could somebody please do the appropriate research and list when KDPS truly first went on the air... or, alternatively, remove this misleading information? I don't want to remove the information for fear of it appearing as vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fortissimo (talk • contribs) 08:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate/Misleading Info: First Air date/Former Callsigns

message: As this article appears to be an advert, the neutral point of view is questionable. Some examples:
* Weasel words
** Kids Radio Mania is considered the premier radio station for children in the country.
* Missing references
** Unlike Radio Disney, it does not air any inappropriate pop material.
** Unlike some of the folk-based public radio children's programs
* Point of view
** Instead the format is run as a true radio format that is addictive for kids
** In addition to entertaining, the station educates.
The notability of the program must be established as well, otherwise the article may be prodded or even deleted. -- ReyBrujo 18:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Sinistrals

message: I've movied "The Sinistrals (Lufia)" to just "Sinistrals", since the former title was too long, and redundant since "Sinistrals" was just a redirect. --DrBat 18:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: move

message: A list the Sinistal's special attacks isn't really the sort of information appropriate for Wikipedia (which actually has very specific guidelines concerning what they consider to be "Game Guide" material), so I'm deleting it. I'm also going to take out some of the, well, more trivial items from the trivia section with the goal of incorporating the rest of the section into the body of the article at a later date.
S. Luke 06:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic Information 

message: I have already merged the pertinent information manually into Characters of Lufia#The Sinistrals.
-GoldThong (talk) 07:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you should just redirect the page, you don't delete pages after a merge unless there is a reason behind it (there is a reason behind redirection over deletion btw). Also you probably want to make a note of the merge in the ongoing Afd. --Sin Harvest (talk) 08:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for deletion
Talk:Drug-eluting stent

message: The majority of this article is written/edited by BeingObjective, but he is permanently banned, therefore I would nominate the article, as I also substantially contributed to the article, see https://xtools.wmcloud.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Drug-eluting%20stent/
-- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 09:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The reviewer abandoned this nomination. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article Nomination
Talk:Berger Picard

message: Add item to Interesting facts section-
July 16, 2016 Eclipse's One N Only, owned by Donna Beadle and Debbie Butt, handled by Amanda Giles, became the first Berger Picard to win an AKC All Breed Best in Show. 
citation-
http://caninechronicle.com/show-wins-gallery/2016104803-green-mountain-dog-club-inc-3/ MJBeadle (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2017 

message: The wording of the appearance section read very similarly to the kind of language used by fanciers/breed standards, so I searched for the term and came across this: https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn-origin-etr.akc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/15123211/Berger-Picard-Club-Flier-20220422.pdf now the only issue is that this flyer's upload date is 2022, whilst the text has been present since 2006, although that does not necessarily mean the text was not copied from a now dead or even paper version of a breed standard. Traumnovelle (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential copyright issue
Talk:John P. Lucas

message: This section is terrible. It seems like revisionist history.
I note the editor above made some comment that blame comes down to nationalist lines, the British condemn Lucas, the Americans condone.
Well considering the undeniable facts, that the landings went largely unopposed, that the road to Rome (if a reconnoitring force had been sent out) lay open , the resulting failure to drive inland created, arguably, 43,000 unnecessary  combat casualties (7,000 killed, 36, 000 wounded or missing).  
Compare Anzio to the Normandy Landings. Breakout was the key, and Eisenhower knew that (hence the fear of the Panzer Korps in the Pas de Calais)
Maybe Lucas was combat weary, but that does not excuse the fiasco that followed, while he was in command. 
The Americans got hemmed in by Kesselring's forces and were shelled and strafed for weeks on the beaches.
In the end, Lucas had to go.
I note that the editor who has written the apologist peace makes no allusions to Patton for instance, if he hadn't have been relieved himself for striking a soldier, Anzio would have been so, so different.
Why?
Patton was an attacking general not a defensive officer sitting in his dugout.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.104.160 (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relieved of Command 

message: ::: While I do not disagree with the intent of the tags added on 9/4/09, there were so many that it made the section almost impossible to read. Surely the section tags are enough to make the point that the section needs referencing an containsa lot of uncited POV. 
::: The notion that Patton or anyone else could have taken and held Rome with a two-division force is plain silly; the differences between Anzio and Normandy are far too numerous to mention.
::: regards, DMorpheus (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  tags, Sep 4 
Talk:Harriot Stanton Blatch

message: Harriot Blatch was an attractive woman and good mother. This photo unintentionally perpetuates the stereotype that feminists were unfeminine.
If the Britannica.com photo is under copyright, and the photo of Harriot Blatch with mother Elizabeth Stanton and daughter Nora Barney, can I suggest: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mrs._Harriet_Stanton_Blatch_148007v.jpg Jocanfan (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sad picture
Talk:Leicester Caribbean Carnival

message: It would be nice to see some pictures to go along with this article! I will hunt for some FDL or CC ones.--Tt22 18:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's a fantastic picture, but it's the best one of the half-dozen I had.  --ajn (talk) 20:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bitis

message: Sometimes, you run into references to the giant vipers of Africa. It's nothing official, but you sometimes see it on the Internet and I'm sure I've seen it in literature before. I guess the giant vipers would normally be B. arietans, B. gabonica and B. nasicornis, but I have yet to discover who first used this description. If it wasn't meant to be precise, I feel B. parviocula, should be added to this list, as according to Spawls and Branch (1995) it probably grows to over 1 m in length (definitely not one of the smaller species). --Jwinius 18:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Giant vipers of Africa

message: Given that the Gaboon viper in this genus is known for its huge fangs, is the genus name related to English 'bite'? The article should probably say one way or the other, if a source exists.Vultur~enwiki (talk) 07:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origin
Talk:University Park at MIT

message: Fort Washington, Cambridge redirects here, but there is very little information on the fort in the article -- Beland 18:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Washington 
Talk:Great Seto Bridge

message: This is really a beautiful bridge. The views are beautiful when the fog and clouds do not close in.  The "Trivia" section should be renamed "Bridge Stats" or something similar. Or maybe moved into a info box. See:  Akashi-Kaikyō Bridge The use of a map would be very helpful. By comparing how other bridge articles are done, this article can be improved. This can be a great article.  Good start! Please continue to work on it. Enfermero (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: These six named bridges have their own stubby little articles.  Each of these articles is a copy-and-paste of each other with the details changed.  Why do we need this?  Let's just merge them all here. JIMp talk·cont 05:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Scientists began investigations shortly after 
They were more likely to have been engineers: civil, structural and geotechnical engineers. Jono from oz (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scientists" more likely engineers
Talk:Alex Kampouris

message: Please note that as per the Wikipedia manual of style, section headings should only be capitalized for proper nouns and the first letter of the line.   --KPWM_Spotter 18:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hacker (hobbyist)

message: I've just merged this article to hacking (innovation), which was formerly titled Hacker (programmer subculture). Please see the discussion at talk:hacking (innovation)#Grand merge for the rationale and a plan for moving forward. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand merge 

message: Support I believe there is so much overlap we're better off with a single well written article Deku-shrub (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal - to Hacker (programmer subculture)
Talk:Mackey Sasser

message: I'm a die-hard Met fan. I remember watching games when Sasser did indeed hesitate before throwing the ball to second to try to catch guys stealing. It didn't happen as often as when he threw the ball back to the pitcher. And guys used to steal bases on him during his hesitation fits. That's really messed up that it affected him even after his career. I didn't know that. I'm glad he overcame it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.23.209 (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sasser's throwing problem 
Talk:Pretelescopic astronomy

message: This article is written in a rather odd style.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.0.33 (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have eliminated a lot of drivel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.67.11 (talk) 16:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd
Talk:Non-abelian gauge transformation

message: First sentence of the article: "The specificity of a non-Abelian Lie group is that its elements do not commute." So this means that the elements work from their home offices?--Seriously, this is the most confused and confusing article I've seen in a long time. It also doesn't help that a reference to the very basic term constant is the only outgoing link on this page. It would be really great if someone with understanding of the subject could bring this closer to being comprehensible for the average reader. Thanks a lot. Geheimdienst 18:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put a link from Abelian group to here and back. People there did a great job, and this page is related. 20:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The problem is that this article was originally about non-abelian gauge transformations. But instead of giving it an appropriate title, the person who wrote it put it here (which had previously been a redirect to abelian group). Other people have have since added stuff about non-abelian groups, resulting in the current strange article. It needs to be sorted out, but I'm not sure of the best way to do this. I don't really see much point in having an article about non-abelian groups, and if we do have such an article it should be at non-abelian group anyway. --Zundark 17:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the point. What about setting up an article titled non-abelian gauge-tranformations using the content of this article. Any article about non-abelian groups could be indeed very short, but I think it could be useful for readers who stumble across the term non-abelian for the very first time. --Benjamin.friedrich 12:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest breaking the article in two articles, Non-abelian group and Non-abelian gauge tranformation, and making the current page into a disambiguation page (as is done for Abelian). --Zundark 13:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why we need separate articles on non-abelian groups and abelian groups, or separate disambiguation pages non-abelian and abelian. I'd agree with Benjamin: delete the bits on non-abelian groups and move this article to non-abelian gauge transformation (or merge into gauge transformation). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I would prefer to do. (My suggestion above was designed to accomodate Benjamin's desire for an article on non-abelian groups.) --Zundark 15:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I somehow managed to miss the "I think it could be useful" in Benjamin's comment. Guess it's time for me to go to bed … But to make it clear: I don't think it's useful - anybody will realize that a non-abelian group is a group that is not abelian, or won't they? -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Since everybody seems to agree, I did this a short while ago. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, I changed it to a disambig page, with a link to abelian. -- Fropuff 17:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ibn al-Khashshab

message: Is this the same Ibn al-Khashshab who was qadi of Aleppo? He died in 1134 so I guess it can't be. I think the two are confused on this page though. Adam Bishop 19:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, establishing context, explaining why the subject is interesting or notable, and describing its notable controversies, if there are any. It should be between one and four paragraphs long, should be carefully sourced as appropriate, and should be written in a clear and accessible style so that the reader is encouraged to read the rest of the article.
See: Wikipedia:Lead Section
Jerry lavoie 02:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Section and {context} Tag
Talk:Claque

message: Are there still claques? Are they as widespread and prevalent as the article indicates they were during the 1800s? The article says that Toscanini and Mahler discouraged them, but doesn't really indicate how successful that effort was. -- 140.142.20.101 (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For sure the audiences of David Letterman where filled with them. Also TNA Wrestling is well known for it. They may not call themselves Claquers, but it is what they are doing. I suspect every singing show like Idol use it too, as there is no way anyone would applaud for half of what they do. I'd say it's alive and well.  
I wonder if claques are limited to merely clapping. 
Rumor has it that, probably in the mid- to late 1940's, producers paid teenagers to scream during Frank Sinatra concerts. 
I dunno. Were these screamers? 74.100.137.109 (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Times