lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Suai Church massacre

message: There is a POV tag on this article, but no discussion here. So I'm soliciting such a discussion. What do people feel is POV here? – Scartol • Tok 16:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the author, I've always wondered; this was one of the first things I wrote for Wikipedia and while I know it could be a contentious topic I tried to be fair. It turns out the tag was added here by a user who has since been banned, so he can't explain himself now. I'd also like to know what's problematic, and if nothing, then remove the tag. Rigadoun  (talk) 23:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV?
Talk:Morgan

message: Who is Morgan Dwyer? What is a health and safety officer? Are Morgan LaFaye a real band? Seems quite odd. Wobbler1 5/2/07
hey  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.147.40.191 (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Morgan Dwyer

message: e. g Morgan Freeman. Where are they? [edit] Nevermind, here's a vandal going on always removing the entire "People named Morgan" section. see Morgan (given name) -andy 217.50.56.171 (talk) 22:37, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Morgan as a given name

message: There was a failed "Morgan Kane" movie attempt.  This does not justify a Wikipedia article nor a no blue link DAB page entry.  So, I will delete the defective entry.  - Fartherred (talk) 15:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed movie attempt

message: Thanks For added me to the friends list Morganrichardson51 (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friends 

message: Ben is a weirdo and he is mean to me witch is mean so i am going to be mean back is that what i should do mommy xiani is also mean to me and so is evah so i am going to me mean back 173.167.212.97 (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ben
Talk:United Nations Integrated Mission in East Timor

message: should this article be named United Nations Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste as that is the actual name of the mission?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.28.28 (talk) 07:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Other than the intro section, the article centres around the 2007 elections with no mention as to why the mission is still there Stu.W UK (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 
Talk:United Nations Mission in East Timor

message: This article is largely verbatim from http://www.un.org/peace/etimor99/Fact_frame.htm. Needs a substantial improvement. Tlongers (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor

message: Usually merges - however logical and plain to the editor doing the merger require a conversation somewhere -usually? - sort of give an idea of why it is being done at least? SatuSuro 23:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uh?

message: Anyone actively maintaining content on this page? Quite like the logic of using Infobox: former country to express the UN's time as executive - possible better than infobox UN. Anyhow, the progression of ET pages is seriously incoherent at the moment  Tlongers (talk) 08:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: Many countries have been left out of the introduction in which it states the countries in the UN force. I could be mistaken, but the archived website lists a lot more countries. Should other information concerning UNTAET be added to the article as well? 
The archive website can be found here. Tiffdmo14 (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contingencies involved in UNTAET
Talk:Cyprian Bridge Island

message: I can find no reference to this information anywhere on the internet except on Wikipedia, and on other sites which appear to have derived their information from Wikipedia. There is an island at this location, but its name is Obeani. I would like to see some references to confirm this obviously colonial-type name as ever being a recognized name. I am sure it is not the recognized name today. Ptilinopus (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake entry?
Talk:Nggela Islands

message: It's not mentioned whether the Florida Islands have been explicitly renamed to "Nggela". Has there been any story behind it? Maybe a part of some de-europeanisation campaign? Or have the two names always coexisted? In any case, which one is older?--Adûnâi (talk) 06:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were they renamed?
Talk:Liber Usualis

message: "The Liber usualis does not reflect the new order of chant propers for the Masses of the church year by order of the Council." 
Please cite a source from Council documents which verify that the calendar changes were "by order" of the Council.  The Appendix to Sacrosanctum Consilium only states that the church has no objection to various proposals for calendar reform, referring specifically to the stabilization of Easter (which has not been accomplished).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magistra (talk • contribs) 14:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calendar Changes by order of the Council?
Talk:Nendö (island)

message: Took out "The island is currently leased by Shrimpjaw enterprises." It looks incorrect (unable to find other information on a "Shrimpjaw Enterprises".  205.158.109.36 (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: not clear how to pronounce the ö.WisDom-UK (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I just added the pronunciation. - Womtelo (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks.. quick response!WisDom-UK (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation needed
Talk:New Georgia

message: Does the name commemorate the Caucasian country, the U.S. state, or something else? --rossb (talk) 14:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/John Carter

message: Warlordjohncarter's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 20:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: updated to new username. Agathoclea (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Since the candidate has changed his name in the middle of the RFA, it's unlikely that people will search for his RFA with his previous name. I would suggest we move this RFA to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/John Carter. GlassCobra 19:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible. However, I have linked to the current page on my user page, and would like to ensure that at least a redirect is in place. John Carter (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree on both counts. Agathoclea (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Apologies to everyone again for the confusion. John Carter (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving RFA
Talk:Tenure of Office Act (1867)

message: I don't know enough about the topic to do it myself, but this article needs some real help.  Looks like it was worked on by someone with rather poor English, or who was just being very hasty and imprecise.  I've cleaned up some hanging bits of code, but the content is still pretty awful, especially in the abstract.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.197.59 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 28 May 2008
Cock
Also, Edwin Stanton was not a Republican, he was a Democrat from Ohio.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.94.0.4 (talk) 12:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was the Tenure of Office Act found to be invalid, as expressed in the quote at the end of the "Constitutionaliy" section, or was it "likely invalid", as it is described at the end of the third paragraph of the article? There should be consistency in this description. Thoughts? Eegorr (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supreme Court finding in 1926
Talk:Vanikolo Islands

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to Vanikoro? It seems the more common spelling and is used within the article as well. Daamsie (talk) 11:12, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I totally agree.  Can't remember how you do that, but I'm in favour of the change. —— Also, although technically this is a group of several islands, "Vanikoro" is normally treated as if it were a single island, I mean in the way it is referred to by everybody: in fact I have never heard Vanikoro islands used anywhere else than here on Wikipedia. This is I think a case of hypercorrection, as if the entry for "Australia" were renamed "Australia Islands" just because there are other islands included in it (Tasmania etc.). So my final recommendation would be to have the entry as Vanikoro, full stop. (NB: I know the island well, having spent some time there and done some research on it). Womtelo (talk) 03:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas Horrocks Openshaw

message: *Please note: this new article is not the same one that was nominated for deletion as a copyvio and deleted at my request on January 12 2008. Jack1956 (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article 
Talk:Socialist Party of Timor

message: President's wikipedia page not linked (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avelino_Coelho_da_Silva)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11893945AA (talk • contribs) 04:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other
Template talk:Gmina Ruja

message: Reverting, not because I don't like the other look, but because most other Polish subdivisions already have navboxes done this way. Since there are often two of these boxes together on the same page (e.g. on the Gmina Ruja page itself), I find it looks strange if they represent different styles, even if the other style is more common throughout WP. Maybe the whole lot could be converted (preferably by a bot), but I'm not sure that the present style doesn't in fact have some advantages - it makes the whole thing look less "fussy" when there are more categories than the two we have here.--Kotniski (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, it makes them more consistent with the other navboxes throughout Wikipedia and it makes them more compact (it may render differently for different skins and browsers but for me the current version of the navbox takes up twice as much screen space as the one with groups). If I were to make a project of converting all the Polish subdivision navboxes, so that there's no inconsistency, would that sit okay? I don't have a bot but I've done things like this manually before. Bryan Derksen (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised the current version takes up more space on your screen than the grouped version - can you describe how the current version looks? (what's taking the space?) As for converting the whole lot, perhaps you could raise the matter at Portal talk:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board first, in case there are any objections. It's not a task I would want to undertake manually though - there must be about 500 such templates in existence.--Kotniski (talk) 08:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Better than describe, I can show. Screenshot is to the right showing "before" and "after" images. I just did a quick look around and by my count there are 478 templates in the Polish subdivision categories, so your estimate is unfortunately spot on. But I can think of a variety of ways to simplify the task. For example, all the navboxes I just had a look at had a highly standardized structure, so I could create templates specifically for Gminas (for example) that would do most of the formatting automatically. It's a big job but I've worked on jobs this big before, a few months back I helped move roughly 500 cricket-related templates from one format to another. I'll bring the issue up at the notice board you suggested in a few days when I've got a bit more spare time on my hands. Bryan Derksen (talk) 10:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See what you mean. I don't get that extra whitespace on my browser. Is it any better now (since my slight modification to the parameters)? Anyway, will wait for you to bring up the matter of wholesale change at the Poland talk page. If it goes through then I might be able to help out with the changes, using my bot (which was also used to create most of the templates in their existing form).--Kotniski (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Civil Aviation Division of East Timor

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20080827164706/http://www.timor-leste.gov.tl/CAA/structure.html - http://www.webcitation.org/6MH1MCqB3
WhisperToMe (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizational chart
Talk:Malaita Province

message: Commons has two different flags: 
* "File:Flag of Malaiita.png"  (The misspelling "Malaiita" appears to have originated on FOTW, where it has since been corrected.)
** Used on a provincial government COVID-19 notice
* "File:Flag of Malaita.svg" 
** Seen in this 2020 pro-Taiwan provincial government demo
FOTW has both flags and a third, as does this "malaita anthem" youtube video.
If I had to guess it would be that the first flag is recognised by the central Solomon government and the second one is favoured by separatists, and maybe the provincial government vacillates? But until someone has citable sources it is safer to list neither so I have removed it from the infobox. jnestorius(talk) 14:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Fill dirt

message: There are too many articles on the subjects "cut" and "fill" that all seem to cover the same topic. They are all small articles. I think they should be merged into one article with appropriate redirects.
*Cut and fill is 3 KB (508 words)
*Cut (earthmoving) is 2 KB (358 words)
*Cutting (transportation) is 1 KB (212 words)
*Embankment (transportation) is 1 KB (154 words)
*Fill dirt is 2 KB (384 words)
Can't these be merged into one article with the appropriate sections and redirects? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many stub articles on the same topic 
Talk:Prior (ecclesiastical)

message: To be, or not to be?  Is this thy question? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.157.165 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.124.47 (talk) 23:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 16:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - per nom. Estar8806 (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom.  --- Tbf69 P • T 19:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 1.7 % of the visits to Prior result in a click to the dab page . If that ratio were 17%, then there would clearly be no primary topic, if it were 0.17, then the status quo would be fine, 1.7% is within the inconclusive range, so we'd need to judge based on other considerations. – Uanfala (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The overall traffic is pretty low, so maybe the fact that the hatnote is the 2nd most clicked link in the article is more indicative of there being something a bit off. --Joy (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Comment If the hatnote at the top of the page was written in such a way as to include one or more specific alternatives such as the probability page it may render the reasoning for the move moot. Actually, I would suggest that that be done anyway. Gusfriend (talk) 06:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 February 2023
Talk:National Parliament of the Solomon Islands

message: As indicated at the bottom of the article, as well as in the Constitution and on the parliamentary website, the name of Parliament is "National Parliament of Solomon Islands", with no definite article. (This is due to the fact that the country's official name is "Solomon Islands", again with no definite article.) Aridd (talk) 10:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarifying name
Talk:Foreign relations of Solomon Islands

message: I propose to merge Solomon Islands-United Kingdom relations into Foreign relations of Solomon Islands. I think that the content in the Solomon Islands-United Kingdom relations article can easily be explained in the context of Foreign relations of Solomon Islands, and the Foreign relations of Solomon Islands article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Solomon Islands-United Kingdom relations will not cause any problems. There is insufficient content in Solomon Islands-United Kingdom relations to warrant a seperate article and because of the low level of activity of the UK in Solomons, there is unlikely to be. The source page has not been developed and has attracted little attention. Ex nihil (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Solomon Islands

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Derek Sikua

message: Can anyone provide information as to why Derek Sikua is invariable referred to as "Dr Sikua" in the Australian press? Masalai (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Dr Sikua"
Talk:Maasina Ruru

message: I've never seen Maasina Ruru described as "Marxist Rule". There were, to my knowledge, never any prominent Marxists in the Solomon Islands emancipation movements. Does Fiifii'i's book attest this? Unless I'm mistaken, he was not a Marxist himself. Aridd (talk) 08:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Implant

message: Why does it state 'citation needed' when in the references and external links a link to the full script is included? Blonkm (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  and they're spectacular 

message: don't delete.  the main Seinfeld page has eight (8) entries under Catchphrases and 7/8 episode article talks about the catchphrase in the opening paragraph except this one - of course it should be mentioned and prominently.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehornet (talk • contribs) 13:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a blog post and also a primary source. Maybe you find a secondary, reliable source discussing it, that could be worth mentioning. But singling out a single blog post form Harvard and in the lead? No. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double Dipping
Talk:Jimmie Rodgers (Pacific Community)

message: Since Jimmie Rodgers is no longer the Deputy DG, but began his second three-year term as DG in 2008 (his first term as DG began in 2005), perhaps someone who knows how might change the name of this page to reflect this. Newportm (talk) 21:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimmie Rodgers (SPC Deputy Director General) > Jimmie Rodgers (SPC Director General)
Talk:Sharzy

message: It seems likely that "Yumi Flo" and "Iu Mi Flow" are actually the same; they appear to be alternative spellings of the same expression in Pijin. ("Yumi" and "iu mi" are two ways of spelling the Pijin word for "we" ("you and I").) I'm not sure whether to remove the latter; whoever added them to the article didn't provide a source, and I can't find a reliable one. (An Island Sun article from April 2011 doesn't count, since it's a copy/paste from this Wikipedia article.) Aridd (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tanagra figurine

message: Here's what I wrote at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Altes_Museum-Tanagra-lady_with_fan.jpg
------------
If you compare this statue with:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lady_in_blue_Louvre_MNB907.jpg
you can see they are likely part of the same run of mass-produced Tanagra figurines mentioned in the figurine article, just with different accessories (foreshadows of Barbie!) and with different levels of preservation (e.g., paint, the exposed foot). 
It would be cool to show this comparison somehow, esp. in the figurine article, but wouldn't that be original research on my part? Due to my health, I don't have the wherewithal to pursue this further myself, so I'm mentioning it here and at the figurine article's Talk page. 
Thanks to any advice or work on this idea!
--Geekdiva (talk) 07:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar statue: from same mass-produced run?
Template talk:USN transports

message: , what's your source for this? I read an off-wiki article this month that asserts it's a trainer designation, as the TF was originally envisioned as a trainer for the S2F, and never redesignated. I can't remember where at the moment, but I'll search my browser history later. BilCat (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I remember seeing TF being listed as a "Transport" designation by one source, but I don't remember where I saw it.  It would make more sense as a trainer designation, though. - ZLEA T\C 23:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "T" was clearly used for "trainer" by the Navy during the fifties, so you should probably revert back for now. If I find the source on the TF, I'll add it to the C-1 article. BilCat (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a print source that states its a trainer designation. It's Aircraft Carriers by Chris Bishop and Chris Chant (2004), p. 168. I'll add that to the C-1 article now. BilCat (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "T-series"?
Talk:Paul LaVinn

message: I found an additional source here that appears to place him at Upper Iowa University with the basketball program, and a little something here that looks like it links to his high school coaching, but may contain more information... but I don't really feel like paying the fee to see the article.  Anyone have rights to view it?--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional sources