lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peres Center for Peace

message: Hello. I'm not sure that Ron Pundak is still director general of the Center (see here). Does anybody know? Ajnem (talk) 11:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director general 

message: it's now called "Peres Center for Peace and Innovation" and has a lot of updated info, for example the Israeli innovation center, a visitor center that was opened in the building. Shenhavster (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jack Frost (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 January 2021 

message: Hello!
There is a recent development that is worth adding to this page. It is to mention that: on March 3, 2021, the Peres Center for Peace and Innovation launched an annual tradition of awarding the Center’s knightly award, “Medal of Distinction”, to 11 groundbreaking women, role models, who are designing a new future in Israel. The 11 women who received the 2020 Medal of Distinction are : Prof. Shulamit Levenberg, Dr. Yale Gold Zamir, Julia Zaher, Lili Ben-Ami, Maisa Halabi Elshekh, Dr. Orna Berry, Yuvi Tashome-Katz, Hana Rado, Ruth Polachek, Shirin Natour Hafi, and Baroness Ariana de Rothschild.
Https://nocamels.com/2021/03/Peres-center-11-women-medal-distinction/
Https://technion.ac.il/en/2021/03/medals-of-distinction/ ArteckCaps (talk) 17:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: User:ArteckCaps Yes thats good to add but I'm not sure where - where do you suggest? I corrected the typo in the second link you provided --Trimton (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest putting it at the end of “Peres Peace House” before reaching “Awards”. Though, it would also make sense to restructure the article to make place for further elaboration on current/ future activities by the institution. I’m new to this, I’m sure you know more than I do. ArteckCaps (talk) 00:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 April 2021
Talk:La Ronde (play)

message: ok. the play is known in the western world as la ronde. rightly or wrongly the french has a dramatic sensibility. its a play not an essay and deserves our imagination and flair not literal translation. otherwise if written in english language should it be called round dance? as for the syphillis ref, well its there love, lets put it out there!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.179.132 (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What to call the page?

message: I feel bad about being stinky without doing a proper editing. But this English page is a catastrophy and I am no native speaker and also dont have wikipedia experience so I am not able to edit it good.
But nevertheless I have some things to say:
What is "La Ronde is the title usually given to Arthur Schnitzler's 1897 play Reigen." supposed to mean??? "La Ronde" is the title of Max Ophüls 1950s cinema version, so why is the French title "usually given to Arthur Schnitzler's piece "Reigen"? I don't get it.
"The play caused a scandal because one of its principal themes was the transmission of syphilis in all layers of Viennese society." Did he even read the play? Why is this odd reading off the text supposed to be "one of its principal themes"???
And then all this references to movies makes the body of the article ... what about the play itself?? This is one of the worst articles I have read in a long time, please make it better! Look at the German version for a start.. its a way better article. And sorry again that I cannot do it (dew to reasons above). Mtoumba 18:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a ignorant stub 

message: Forty years after Arthur Schnitzler’s death in 1982, his son Heinrich Schnitzler releasedLa Ronde for German-language performances
This sentence doesn't make sense...Schnitzler died in 1931, didn't he? 
70.250.209.137 (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction needed
Talk:Land of Onias

message: <quote>The opinion was prevalent among the Rabbis that the temple of Onias was situated at Alexandria—an error that is repeated by all the chroniclers of the Middle Ages. This temple is also sometimes confounded with the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim.[18]</quote>
This is pure nonsense. 210.84.40.154 10:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is "pure nonsense" to say that pointing out that the rabbis were incorrect about the location of the temple (an error well-documented and sourced) is part of an "agenda". Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 13:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There were not because they never said it was IN Alexandria. Many Rishonim point out that it was NEAR Alexandria. The Talmud itself in some places makes this very clear. (E.g. the mention in Bavli Megillah.) It is pure nonsense because the only people pushing such an agenda are people who blinding ignoring any other mentions in the Talmud. 203.206.229.45 15:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The information comes directly from the Jewish Encyclopedia, hardly a repository for anti-Talmudic propaganda. I do not have the reference in Megillah directly available to me at the moment. However, many prominent rabbis, including Berel Wein,  do appear to believe that Onias' temple was in Alexandria.   Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 15:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Rabbinic agenda 

message: Can someone provide support for thinking that the Greek name is "’Ονείον"? I looked at the citation and all that's there is the genitive, ’Ονίου. So it doesn't look like it should have the diphthong. I couldn't find the place name in Liddell-Scott-Jones, so I'm not sure what the lexical form or gender are.
Also, does anyone know how to create smooth and rough breathing? I don't see it down there in the list of characters. 128.186.238.250 17:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Greek place name "’Ονείον"? 

message: To figure out the period when this "land of Onias" existed, one needs to read all through, click on every wikilink, and still not fully figure out the timeline. Who can fix this? An infobox could be a start. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 11:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates!!! It's about history, dates are essential and are largely missing
Talk:Fort King George

message: I will continue to work on this page, adding categories, etc. I think it is significant enough to keep around.
User: Havardj Jack 17:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: Great work, but there are two things:
# It needs wikilinks
# I think it goes too far beyond the scope of the fort in the background section.  Bubba73 (talk), 02:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - it covers 200 years of Southeast settlement, rivalry among the European powers, the Spanish mission system, etc., for a fort that was used for only six years. This is not typical coverage of articles on forts and overwhelms content dealing with the fort.  Needs to be more focused. Some of the material, written with great verve, should be applied to other articles on the Southeast. Parkwells (talk) 00:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: recent changes
Talk:Import substitution industries

message: * http://www.clemson.edu/uced/Targeted_Industry_Development/redrl_rpt19summ.pdf
* http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-0076.00041
--Busy Stubber 02:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible references
Talk:Gray's monitor

message: I created this page because there were previously pages at both Gray's monitor, Butaan and Varanus olivaceus.  The merge proposal is here. I used the shorter version of the text from the two pages, because the longer looked like a possible copyright violation, and the shorter simply a summary of the longer version.  I also added a taxobox and a few wikilinks.  See the histories of the two redirects for authorship of the current version.  Enuja 17:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created Page

message: "Butaan" now redirects to this article. -- • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Talk 14:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created redirect for ''Butaan''
Template talk:John Steinbeck

message: I left a number of Steinbeck works off the template because I couldn't determine if they were fiction or non-fiction and they didn't have Wikipedia pages.  If somebody happens to know which category his other works are, feel encouraged to add them to the template (or let me know on the talk page here and I can add them!) --JayHenry 17:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:IÉ 22000 Class

message: The recent edit by 84.66.246.166 re no. of 3 & 6-car sets is, I believe, correct. However, my own sources tell me that all car types are powered. A "B1" type being identical to the "B" type except for the addition of sanding. This would mean that only 2 cars of the 3-car set would be powered, which doesn't seem likely. Unless you know differently?? Suckindiesel 23:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Car types

message: I've removed ref to TCC & substituted Hyundai Rotem as manufacturers. These cars are made in Rotem's plant in Korea, not by TCC, who merely supplied the bogies. Therefore TCC are in the same category as any other sub-supplier. Suckindiesel (talk) 17:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Manufacturer

message: The given car weight of 63 tonne seems unreasonably high and is uncited.  If I have it right it was added on 05:08 20 February 2012 UTC by  ... be aware any internet sources post this date may have originated from Wikipedia.  Djm-leighpark (talk) 01:26, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hyundai Rotem project Record IE 22000 DMU (original) gives trainset weight 287t for 378 passengers ... implies a six car set.  48t per railcar.  It looks like this may be from project stage.  Propose this is used unless anything better arises. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Having also seen other sources not useable in wikipedia I weight 48t-49t is the correct weight, I understand circa 60t is the crush weight (without pushers). Being pedantic a better source is required but I think this is adequate for most purposes.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car weight 63 tonne 

message: Seems to have been a trial to reduce fuel consumption ... noting for possible late article enhancment, Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised transmission trial 

message: Just about to revert unsourced information about a model ... sourced information is required .... I guess the'll need one for the Fry and I guess that will need to be OO/EM from the rumours .... Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Model

message: I have seen an ICR at Midleton recently, is it just me? or does Wikipedia not mention it? Ié 2600 Class (talk) 06:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Services
Talk:108 Martyrs of World War II

message: The group comprises 3 bishops, 52 priests, 26 members of male religious, 3 seminarians, 8 female religious and 9 lay people.
3+52+26+3+8+9=101 where are other 7?? 188.123.231.30 (talk) 16:43, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: number

message: Given the fact that this article is currently just a stub, I would like to propose merging the List of the 108 Martyrs of World War Two here. If substantially more content is added in the future, the list can always be split out again. Thoughts? –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged - no objections after five weeks. –Black Falcon (Talk) 17:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal: List of the 108 Martyrs of World War Two

message: The Salesian priest and martyr Jozef Kowalski (1911-1942) is shown in blue font. Clicking on it redirects you to another Jozef Kowalski, born in 1900, a veteran of the Polish-Soviet War (1919-1921), and still living. Can you fix, please?
Musicwriter (talk) 22:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Poles with the same name 

message: Is this category correct? I mean, the Nazi Germany wasn't technically an atheist state, and the pro-regime priests were not persecuted, so technically there was no religious persecution of Christians  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.73.191.168 (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Persecution by atheist states"
Talk:Bieudron Hydroelectric Power Station

message: You are not up-the date.
The legal act under the federal tribunal is since longetime closed. The four parties have been punished to pay the amount about 3 Mio CHF (about 3.1 Mio US$ today) see final decicion of tribunal federal from january 19th of 2009 see here.
--Cosy-ch (talk) 16:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pen stock rupture 
Talk:Manufactured Landscapes

message: Not complete, but a good start I think.  Does anyone know what type of camera he is using? SimonC 18:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First sentence states that the photographer took pictures all over the world while on a tour of Asia. Reword perhaps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.208.60 (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity
Talk:Energy switching services in the UK

message: There's a conflict of interest discussion going on at WP:COIN#uSwitch and Energy switching services in the UK regarding recent edits made by uSwitch to the articles uSwitch and Energy switching services in the UK. Please could anyone interested in these two articles take a look at both that discussion and the edits in question (1, 2) and post their opinions to the COI discussion.
Thanks! — OwenBlacker (who works at uSwitch.com), 11:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:COIN#uSwitch and Energy switching services in the UK|Conflict of interest discussion]]
Talk:William, Prince of Hohenzollern

message: It should be mentioned, William was 'heir presumptive' to his Uncle's throne. He later renounced his rights in 1888, in favour of his younger brother Ferdinand. -- GoodDay (talk) 23:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heir Presumptive to Romanian Throne

message: The Library of Congress has the original negative of the image and it seems to be in the public domain (by virtue of its publication date and the copyright disclaimer of the collection itself): https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2005019135/. Opencooper (talk) 06:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:Single wicket cricket

message: It's very unclear whether the same fielders assist each bowler in turn.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.153.6 (talk) 19:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I for one don't know the answer. It may be that it varied from from one competition to another. JH (talk page) 08:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very obscure 

message: There was a brief revival of the single wicket format round about the late 1960s or early 1970s, when there was a competition in which 16 (I think) leading all-rounders took part. It was a knock-out affair played over two successive days at Lord's. In each tie, the player batting first batted for five overs (I think, but it may have been ten) or until dismissed. The player batting second would then attempt to overhaul his score. The players had a normal complement of fielders to assist them. The competition lasted for about 3 seasons. A quick look in my reference books and online has failed to turn up a reference, but I know that it happened because I attended a couple of days' play myself. JH (talk page) 18:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found one reference (now added to the article).  This is only a single paragraph, however, so if anyone has more, by all means.... Kingdon (talk) 04:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revival 

message: This article is not very informative as to how single wicket cricket differs from more common versions of the game. I think a description of rules and play etc. is needed. 202.89.188.248 (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need description 

message: If single wicket cricket is as defined in the article (a one-on-one game), then the section "1831 laws" appears to not be single wicket cricket. Rather, it appears to still be a team game, with only a single set of wickets. For me, this is confirmed by the fact that the reference  also has rules for normal cricket, which it refers to as "double wicket" in a couple of places. Adpete (talk) 03:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: On further inspection, I am almost certain this is not SWC as defined in the article, and I will delete the section in a couple of days if no one objects. Adpete (talk) 05:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Done. I deleted the copied text, but instead of deleting the section, I renamed it to an alternative definition, since that is what it appears to be. The old text can always be retrieved from an earlier version of the article, or from the reference above. Adpete (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1831 laws - is that something different
Talk:Ahmed Ezz (businessman)

message: This is a brief description of the man according to my knowledge, I want to note that this is my first article.
nÅnNü 18:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I am wondering if I made any mistakes in creating this article.
Your wikipedian fellow ñÅñÑü 18:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, I just corrected talk:GDonato|talk]]) 18:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Nope, this article is very good for a first try, but you might want to add some sources to it. A biography by an independent source for example, would be perfect. Otherwise it's a fine stub. :) Henrik 18:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help Me !!! 

message: This article is targeted by systematic censorship & needs special attention. See these edits:
# 196.219.89.80 (removing content - no explanation)
# Abla salama (removing the same content - no explanation)
# Abla salama (again - no explanation)
# Abla salama (& again - no explanation) This user also removed content from the Arabic Wikipedia! (, , )
# Thunder50 (removing the interwiki to Arabic wikipedia - no explanation)
# Thunder50 (again - no explanation)
# Thunder50 (& again - no explanation)
# Joseph Raleph (removing the ar interwiki)
--Mahmudmasri (talk) 04:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring 

message: I added the tags bias and clean-up since the article seems to be slanted toward it's subject and because it fails to conform to the style guide. I'll fix it up myself within a few days if noone else gets to it. 203.27.72.5 (talk) 05:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias and Clean-up tags 
Talk:Arden Buck equation

message: This article claims that values returned by the formulae are in kPa when in fact they appear to be returned in Pascals.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.37.189.231 (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units returned 

message: t is the absolute air temperature in degrees Celsius
If a temperature is in celsius then it's not absolute.  Which is it?  From the reference, I think the celsius bit is right and the absolute bit is wrong but I'm not confident enough to change this.  EdDavies 18:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celcius vs absolute 

message: These pages should be renamed avoiding equation and substituting with correlation. --93.57.24.9 (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. WP:COMMONNAME. Glrx (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this and related pages with correlations 

message: The equation given here does not match the article "Vapour pressure of water" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapour_pressure_of_water) 93.92.223.57 (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check the equation
Template talk:Pac-12 Conference marching band navbox

message: Created, but no articles for WSU, OMB, or OSUMB yet in Wikipedia Group29 18:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Created stub articles for the three missing bands, changed the template to use the full name for WSU -- Upholder 20:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created
Talk:Neo-Theosophy

message: So what is Neo Theosophy about? There's a lot of names and dates in the article but no comparison to old Theosophy.
Scientology was not particularly influenced by Aleister Crowley. Although L. Ron Hubbard's respect for Crowley is unquestioned, there is little similarity between Scientology theology and Thelema theology.--67.52.196.238 (talk) 05:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is it? 

message: Firestar464 I did explain why I removed the advertising guff. Can you please restore my edit? Fine if you want to move that content to where it belongs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.49.83 (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation 

message: Outdated; Benjamin Creme is called current but died in recent years: whoever edits this more should move him to historical section or update sections such as by century.--dchmelik☀️🕉︎☉🦉🐝🐍☤☆(talk 12:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated
Talk:History of Iranian Balochistan

message: I made some corrections and added a little bit.Hajji Piruz 23:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sparkler

message: This article would benefit from the description of recent trends (including lots of youtube videos) dealing with people binding hundreds of sparklers and using them to create "Sparkler Bombs" that have a dangerously powerful explosion. Many arrests, news reports and other things have happened as a result of this phenomenon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.218.97.104 (talk) 03:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparkler Controversy 

message: This article would benefit from mention of how sparklers are used in nations other than the US, for instance the Japanese "upside down" sparklers. Kouban 18:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparklers in other countries 

message: This article (Sparklers) redirects from a search for "Standard Fireworks." Standard Fireworks really should have their own entry. They were the leading British firework brand for many years, based in Huddersfield, and one of the first brands to introduce Chinese imports to Britain. The name still exists, although they are now owned by Black Cat fireworks of China. Anyway, they really should have their own entry, not just a redirection to sparklers!Wizlop 21:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard Fireworks 

message: Nowhere in definitions of the word firework do dictionaries say that it must be a ground launched projectile.
This opening paragraph is missleading. Sparklers are a hand-held firework.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.187.20 (talk) 01:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I'll edit it now, can anyone who disagrees find some sort of official deffinition that claims otherwise. Will Bradshaw (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  By Definition? 

message: from where & when?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.148.106.242 (talk) 15:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "traditional" . . .
Talk:Like a Virgin (film)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Like a Virgin (film) (redirect). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 28#Like a Virgin (film) (redirect) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Like a Virgin (film) (redirect)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:XV International Brigade

message: I'm back editing Wiki after years away so pardon me if I make any faux pas. 
This section seems a bit superfluous but I'm cleaning it up cosmetically. 
Might rename it to further reading cause as far as I can tell, these aren't sources that are being directly used for the page...? Wallybenjamin420 (talk) 20:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've undone all you changes because you broke the references. DuncanHill (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources sub-section