Talk:News propaganda

message: On 25 March 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was merge and redirect to News management. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fake news for a record of the discussion. – ABCD 20:33, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't participate in that discussion and disagree with the outcome. "News management" is specific to corporations, whilst "propaganda" is (generally) government, and Fake news covers both. Satire and so forth is mostly red herring. This page should become a disambig page. Propaganda needs improving with the substantive content that there is here, including factoring that article as it's already too long. Also things like VNR and Bush administration payment of columnists articles need linking into it and/or public relations. Rd232 13:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What the heck is going on here? I'm confused?  I agree on satire being not in keeping with the subject of the article, so I removed that; but calling includsion of it a red herring (assuming you mean Logical fallacy is incorrect. Whilst the term propaganda may be associated with government, it is not always so. Corporations, not-for-profit organizations and religious institutions are also seen to use propaganda of various types, however, that is outside the scope of this article. I can see this being a reference within the article on Propaganda, but not merged with it, that named article is already too long and, if anything, might do well with some judicious splitting. Calicocat 23:31, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: I added a paragraph about Jeff Gannon/James Guckert below the paragraph on Jayson Blair.  It is taken almost verbatim from the article on him.  Anonymous Coward (I promise, I'll get around to signing up real soon now). 23:17, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeff Gannon 

message: This article, News propaganda, is still just a stub and should be allowed to grow and develop. As one of the editors working on it, I'd like to see it have a chance to develop before being pounced on. I'm not sure what the status of this is now, but I still have it on my watchlist and my intention is to develop it. Sometimes article development and expansion takes time. Calicocat 23:17, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a stub 

message: I have never heard of the US or British governments fabricating news stories. Firstly, the media would likely refuse to comply with this violation of their independence by distributing propaganda. Secondly, if governments even attempted this, there would be a huge uproar. The text does not specify what the news reports are, and how they were intended to reach the public. It seems grossly exaggerated. Pcu123456789 04:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To take a completely cynical point of view, that's rather the point. Raistlin11325 02:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totallydisputed 

message: How can you mention UK and US alleged propaganda and not mention Soviet or Chinese propaganda? At least mention Nazi propaganda! Contralya (talk) 02:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hipocrits 

message: — Assignment last updated by CarsonJones06 (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis