lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leg press

message: Although Pat Robertson's 2000 pound leg press is impressive, I don't think it is a record, nor do I think it deserves its own section. Ronnie Coleman has videos of him pressing 2250 pounds. I don't know what the source of that 1300 pound "record" is, but I don't think it's an actual record. I can leg press 1000 pounds over ten times in a row and I am not an athlete or professional powerlifter. I know a person who can leg press over 1600 lb. I think I will eliminate the section and replace it with another section on the magnitude of a leg press.Alex Klotz 23:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pat Robertson is 76 years old and his claim to be pressing 2000 lbs is part of the promo for his energy drink.  It is, in other words, highly suspect.  The video he has realized only purports to show him pressing 1000 lbs.  I think it should be included as a noteworthy episode, but not as any kind of established record.  Ethan Mitchell 01:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Robertson 

message: I think we need to remove the pictures of this cow and replace them with something that someone could actually stand to look at. I also noticed that this person is used for almost every other weight training part...meaning I think someone added their own fat ass in just for publicity. Hmm_sprinkles 10:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's great.  The image is uploaded under the GNU license and is therefore just about the most valuable image we can get.  If you've got better images, upload them and quit complaining.  WLU 11:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: It must be mentioned that the true leg press is performed to a knee dorsiflexion angle of 90 degrees or slightly less. Claims of much higher weights at lower ranges of motion, assisted by compression fabrics, or involving the use of hands on the knees, are generally invalid. There should be a separate treatment for comparative gains in muscle-mass, strength, power, and endurance using limited range of motion. I have only moderate difficulty lifting 1100 pounds (over 4.5 times my bodyweight) with a single leg provided this lift occurs in the strongest range of the exercise and it has been shown historically that supports in excess of ten times the bodyweight are achievable with both legs. In this light Pat Robertson is unlikely to have "lifted" 2000 pounds, but it is not impossible. Another important consideration is the increased likelihood of injury when exceeding the normal tissue limits of elasticity in full range exercises. Because the torque applied across the knees increases greatly at the lowest point of the lift, minor and serious injuries are more frequent with full range exercises. Finally, one should note that blood pressure spikes during maximal intensity lifts can be dangerous, and training in limited range requires longer recovery periods. Caution is therefore indicated as with any other training regimen.
98.70.40.183 (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range of Motion 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
Talk:Stony Brook, New York

message: EB says:
unincorporated village in Brookhaven town (township), Suffolk county, southeastern New York, U.S. Located on the northern shore of Long Island, on Stony Brook Harbor, it was settled by Boston colonists in 1655. In the 19th century the shipbuilding industry flourished there.
--JimWae 04:37, 2004 Dec 11 (UTC)
EB is wrong.  There are no "unincorporated villages" in N.Y.  The best we can do is to call it a hamlet.  Village is misleading and plain wrong. Nelson Ricardo 05:02, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
Stan Lee?  No idea, cite it please?
Zipmcoccup 22:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On a saner note, some internal fine-tuning is needed for the EXTERNAL LINKS of (1) the "Ward Melville Heritage Organization",  (2) "The Long Island Museum of...", and (3) the "Stony Brook Village."
The "Show preview" SAYS all is fine, but each time after the page is saved, it looks like a MESS!    Dr.Bastedo (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Matthew McGrory

message: To answer an unanswered question in the archive here, when asked about his condition, Matt says: "Oh ya know, I did the testing, up until about a year ago, to find out what was up and..." Then he shrugs. The question starts at 0:45 on this youtube video on Maury Povich's official YouTube page. I'm not sure if that's enough to put on the page or not, so I'll leave it up for consensus. Kire1975 (talk) 00:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis
Talk:RV park

message: Reasons why this page should not be for "speedy deletions". The main reason is that it has the basis (in the form of a bulleted list) for the most common types of RV camping or park facilities. Considering that pages can be edited, the listing provides as a guide for people to expound upon their knowledge and experience with these types of RV options for travelers looking for a play to stay. 
This is something more thought provoking than the word "huh" that was used on the speedy deletion notification page!
MORE:
The Bureau Of Land Managment is an interesting topic that many RVer's are unaware of as an viable place to park. After all, it is your tax payer money at use.  Many BLM areas have both long term (winter) and short term permits. See: the associated .gov sites for more information.
* I take it you are the original contributor. I think I stalled the 'speedy' with my edit, but the article still doesn't have any real content. If you put just a couple of sentences explaining things, and a link or two for reference, it will become a Stub and the admins will take out the speedy tag if they are awake. I'd do it myself but I know nothing about the subject. Kappa 05:37, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note that I have established a separate article, as in Australia, the term 'caravan park' is broadly used to describe this category of accommodation, which is distinct from thne RV park found in the USA.
I hope that I have not upset anyone by doing this!Fitzpatrickjm 12:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Establishment of separate 'Caravan Parks' article

message: I guess it has to be, but this kind of articles generally get a lot of external links where I suspect the goal is to increase the status of some site. 
Does anyone have a good suggestion on what kind of external links this article really needs? 
Greswik 13:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linkfarm

message: The article currently reads "...in allotted spaces known as "pitches" ("sites" in North America, Europe, and Australia).". Where exactly are the english-speaking countries that refer to them as "pitches"?  If what appears to be the vast majority of the English-speaking world calls them "sites", shouldn't that be the primary, and "pitches" be the parenthetical?  Rehcsif (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Making this change. Nobody seems to know about "pitches" after 2 1/2 years, and google comes up with nothing. Rehcsif (talk) 14:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pitches vs Sites?
Talk:Tennessee Mitchell

message: from VfD:
Non notable.  Second wife of a writer.  Sortior 05:06, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
*Sherwood Anderson was notable.  Unless evidence surfaces that Ms. Mitchell/Lane/Anderson was notable as something other than Anderson's wife, she doesn't deserve her own article.  Delete.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 05:34, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Liederkranz cheese

message: Someone suppressed a link to the Category:American cheese under the impression that only processed cheese was American, overlooking Monterey Jack, Vermont Cheddar or Philadelphia Cream Cheese. Culurally constricted. --Wetman 05:23, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: The wording of this article makes it look like it was copy/pasted into WP from somewhere else.  Especially the last paragraph which uses the first person quite a bit and makes me think of some company's "about us" page.  Does anyone know what's going on here? -- BillWeiss | Talk 22:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: The 'Emil Frey' that this article points to within Wikipedia is not the same one as the cheesemaker.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.143.98.31 (talk) 01:19, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Emil Frey

message: This is POV so I will not edit the article.  I was a great fan of Liederkranz and was saddened to see it disappear.  Inspired by this article, I tried Bayrischer Bergsteiger.  It resembles Liederkranz in no way whatever, nor for that matter can I detect much Limburger in it. To quote another who tried it, it resembles Kraft Velveeta more than anything else.  I suggest that the paragraph about this cheese does not belong here.  4.236.234.124 13:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bayrischer Bergsteiger

message: :Liederkranz cheese → Liederkranz — unnecessary qualifier (over redirect)    emerson7 01:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: (as the article claims) ...then it has little or nothing to do with the cheese that was originally called Liederkranz. 2601:200:C000:1A0:F0EA:7A8:9B40:18C1 (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  If it is similar to Époisses ...
Talk:Vanderlei de Lima

message: Hi.  I noticed the image at the top of the article is not what the subtitle claims.  The tag says that in it, we see Vanderlei de Lima returning to Brazil with the bronze medal.  The moment I saw it, I knew that wasn't the case.  When I visited the image's page my suspicions were confirmed.  There, the date of the image says September 7, 2004: that's the Brazilian independence date.  This year, Vanderlei de Lima participated in the official celebrations at the nation's capital, Brasília, he opened the military parade carrying the Brazilian flag.  That's what the image shows: Vanderlei de Lima in the independence parade in Brasília, not his return home from Athens with the bronze medal (in that occasion, he only paraded through Rio de Janeiro on a Firefighter truck, in addition to a similar parade in his native Maringá).  Either we fix the subtitle or we replace the image, which I think would be better.  Regards, Redux 06:13, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Caption
Template talk:Canadian politics

message: Politics of Canada
MonarchyGovernor GeneralParliamentCabinet
Prime MinisterDeputy Prime MinisterMinistersSpeaker of the HouseLeader of the Opposition
Constitution of CanadaPolitical parties
Supreme CourtProvinces and territories of Canada
Elections
I've removed the template from old pages and added it to new ones... I think I got 'em all.  Nice workin with ya Spinboy! - Jord 07:05, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old template 

message: I've noticed a conflict there between a picture and the template, it may need to be cleaned up. Spinboy 07:06, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Supreme Court
Talk:Open Letter to the Scientific Community

message: The content of this article was removed from Non-standard cosmology and put here.  If we decide that this should have its own article, it definitely needs another title.   I saw a "neutrality of this article is disputed" tag on the non-standard cosmology article.  Anyone know if this is part of some kind of pattern?  Also, anyone want to make the case for why this content deserves its own article and shouldn't be merged back into Non-standard cosmology? Dave6 06:23, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Saeculum

message: I added The Fourth Turning reference in a new Further Reading section.  Most of the content in this article is found in that book, which has many references if someone wants to take this to the next level in terms of citations.  Gandalf2000 (talk) 22:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Is a qualifier missing from the definition of "secular"? I th"ink the more common meaning these days is of the people or as opposed to sacred. Esha Neogy (talk) 17:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Secular" meaning
Talk:Kaifeng

message: Where are we getting the population figures from?
:i got my figures from this subpage of the government website of Kaifeng. --Plastictv 07:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: population figures

message: Looking on the map and table on zhwiki Jinming District (金明区) and Kaifeng County (开封县) aren't listed anymore - instead there is a new Xiangfu District (祥符区). Please update enwiki accordingly. --katpatuka (talk) 18:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  new Xiangfu District 

message: Note that the government web portal China.org.cn is on record stating that the name predated the Qin, having been founded as Kaifeng ("Opening Up New Lands") by the Zhuang Duke of Zheng in the late 8th century BC when he was settling some new territory. It had already been renamed Bianliang before the Qin. — LlywelynII 14:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Tokoroa

message: The statement that Tokoroa is a fast growing town, does not reconcile with the opening paragraph declaring no real change in population in the last 14 years.10:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I've changed it.-gadfium 20:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fast growing town

message: Kia ora, I would like a section added in that acknowledges those that have passed on with attributes added in by family members. My father, Graham Rewita was a great man who passed away in 1998 alongside his elder brother Thomas Rewita in lake Taupō. My family are looking into providing a water safety workshop with Taupō council and would like to link it back to Tokoroa  where we come from. TeAOMāori (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has a "notable people" section which lists people who are both notable and have a significant connection to Tokoroa. We include only a few words about each person. In general, we expect such people to have an existing article on Wikipedia with suitable references which demonstrate notability. See our guideline on what makes a person sufficiently notable to have an article. I don't see suitable sources online, so your father may not meet our criteria. You should also see the conflict of interest guideline.-gadfium 22:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acknowledgement of deceased
Talk:Curd

message: Curd (a little sour) is churned well to yield butter floating and the reminiscent is called "butter milk" in india which is believed to be a cooling effects and is used as an effective thirst quencher.
:Pardon? Could anyone try to translate this into proper english? —Spudtater 12:09, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Curd (a little sour)

message: "Paneer, an Indian cheese recipe of only milk and yoghurt/lemon juice from the BBC food website"
whats with the bit??? from the BBC food website? need more info.
124.184.70.211 07:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paneer, an Indian cheese recipe

message: I do not see a reason why the article should include a hatnote link to Curdled (film).  The film has a different title from the article and does not seem to be related in any way.  Is there some reason to include this that I am unaware of? Augurar (talk) 04:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curdled 

message: I am Harish, from India. I am surprised to see that there is no mention of "yogurt or yoghurt"  in the article. I see that the article actually seems to indicate a closely related substance, while all people from our country are used to use this word "curd" as a replacement to "yogurt" used in US, UK etc. Somebody please clear this. I'm indicating this issue in the beginning (introduction) of the article now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harish victory (talk • contribs) 10:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Most US yogurt includes the whey, that is the curds and whey have not been seperated. Yogurt that has been drained of its whey is commonly called Greek yogurt or yogurt cheese. 75.14.212.112 (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curd vs Yoghurt 

message: Under Uses, would it be worth noting the number one use of dairy curd, which is as the first step in making any aged cheese? dtype (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Im not sure what do you mean with that!--AlfaRocket (talk) 19:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in making cheese 

message: Caș is the Romanian name for Curd and not a particular cheese. I propose the merger of the two. Ableci (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree Pol098 (talk) 22:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Caș does translate to 'curd' but it is a cheese in its own right, like quark and other fresh cheeses. I have added a couple of better sources (books) to the article and removed the merge tag. If it is to be merged, this article is not the best target. Leschnei (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I have proposed merging this article into Cheese curd. Please see that articles talk page for my reasoning and further discussion. Leschnei (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another merge proposal
Talk:Nig

message: from VfD:
Try as I might, I don't think I could find a reason for this to be speedily deleted. But still.... --Golbez 06:48, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
*Part is a slang dictdef.  The faintly encyclopedic part I don't put much faith in since the Google hits that use "nig" and "deconstructionist" together are mostly for white-power hate sites that seem to hate both.  Also, this IP address has a very short, questionable history.  Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 06:59, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, billyvamp, I reverted your vandalism to Communism . You're a vandal. Cdc 22:08, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: I hope you've done enough of your research to realize that Wikipedia is not here to "promote postmodern lexical phiosophy [sic]" or to "undo the abhorrent hold of terms in a PC culture"; Wikipedia is in general not for promoting anything. -- Antaeus Feldspar 08:22, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Perhaps, however, Wikipedia has no right to deny inchoate terms from receiving exposure. It is a term, just like any other term featured on Wikipedia; this one however isn't as readily used as nigger. If you choose to redirect the term nig then allow me to insert the current modes of philosophy that wish to desensitize the term, and promote the arbitrary properties of language in general. You must admit, this word is too controversial to be limited in its range of uses and topics. 
Billyvamp4 12:49, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Redirect. Tuf-Kat 08:34, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
*del. Mikkalai 09:08, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: No personal attacks. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:51, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: I'm pretty sure you meant to say "Yo bloo cu of a hyp", since that's so much more pomo.  Oh, no need to thank me; I'm thanked enough by the good feeling I get every time I help out a needy halfw who can't find a cl. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:06, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: That and a dollar will get you something from the Extra Value Menu. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:05, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: By the way, if you want to be taken seriously as a brilliant expert on pomo and not just a garden-variety jerk? Don't vandalize user pages. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:09, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Parkfield earthquake

message: It's not clear why Parkville, CA points here. meatclerk 05:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Parkville, CA

message: I don't believe 'Parkfield-San Bernardino earthquake' is the right name, because the article is generally about the recurring M6.0 earthquakes in Parkfield itself, and 'Parkfield-San Bernardino' refers to the large section of the San Andreas fault that was ruptured in the Fort Tejon earthquake, and that has its own article. A google search for Parkfield-San Bernardino just brings up references to this article. RapidR (talk) 17:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: In case anyone is interested: I am considering rewriting much of this article.  It currently starts with: "" Which is incorrect, as, in terms of notability, the "Parkfield earthquake" is the one of 2004. I intend to explain that, and "the prediction". And improve the sourcing, which is currently three general sources and five urls. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite, with serious "refimprove"
Talk:The Gadget Maker

message: I'm removing the "plot" tag--"This article's plot summary may be too long or overly detailed. Please help improve it by removing unnecessary details and making it more concise."--for these reasons:
* I'm not sure what the criterion would be for being "too long or overly detailed." Wikipedia is not paper.
* This is a book that is long out of print and not terribly easy to obtain. It is not too easy to find information about it. A quick Google suggests that most of the information quickly available online is this Wikipedia article itself. Accordingly, it is reasonable to make the treatment complete and thorough.
* The tag has been up for eight months with no action and no discussion. The editor who inserted the tag, Whpq, did not start a discussion or leave a meaningful edit comment, suggesting that it was a hasty and casual action, and giving no reason to assume that it reflect anything but his personal stylistic preference.
Dpbsmith (talk) 00:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing the "plot" tag
Talk:Pohang University of Science and Technology

message: It is viewed by wikipedia as a conflict of interest for the International Affairs Office to contribute to this article directly. Parts of the article read like a press release; this is one common problem with conflict of interest editing. It is not entirely clear whether the many recent edits are related to POSTECH but it sure seems like it. Gabriel.c.drummond.cole (talk) 01:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest 
Talk:List of Seventh-day Adventist colleges and universities

message: I removed this:
* Ekebyholmsskolan (Swedish Junior College), Sweden
This is a combined primary and secondary school, not a "college or university", as can be seen from the school's homepage. There may well be others like this. / up+land 09:36, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right, feel free to move it or I can later...Djneufville (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Would it be best to organize this list by division instead of what appears to be some sort of hybrid between subcontinents, continents, and divisions?  I'd like to hear your opinions, so comment (vote?) below on whether you'd prefer division, continent, or subcontinent organization. (NorthernFalcon (talk) 00:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Organization 

message: I notice someone has reverted my edit to update the name of this institution. I repeat here my post in Talk for the article Avondale College of Higher Education:
“This year (2019) Avondale College of Higher Education received higher status and recognition and has been renamed Avondale University College. The title and article needs to be adjusted to reflect that. The change was approved on 28 August 2019 by TEQSA (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency), an agency of the Australian federal government. This is recorded in "Record" magazine, Vol. 124, No. 18, 21 September 2019, p12, "Avondale Now a University College", which at least for now can be viewed at https://issuu.com/adventistmedianetwork/docs/record_18_web?e=3527810/49714073 .”
This being the case, I suggest my edit be restored. Ptilinopus (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avondale College of Higher Education