lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Campaignbox First Coalition

message: So, I was thinking, that as this template gets larger and larger, it might be helpful (at least for my understanding of the subject) to make separate campainboxes for the battles of each front (like we now have for the italian campaign) with a discussion page for each front, and on overall campaignbox that lists not to each battle, but to each campaignbox.  Just off the top of my head, I might suggest:
*spanish 
*italian
*netherlands
*germany
*switzerland
*rebellions
*naval
*colonial
*others?
Perhaps this might be too many, but instead of (or in addition to) having all the battles jumbled together chronologically, it might be good to have a box and a page that discusses the battles in terms of the other battles on that front, without having to bounce back and forth to other fronts.  Other ideas?  The Gomm 00:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh.  As a general rule, creating very small campaignboxes is counterproductive; their main purpose is to serve as navigational aids, which doesn't really work too well when they only link to one or two articles.  Splitting this by theater may be doable, of course; but a broad understanding of "theater" is better. Kirill Lokshin 20:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I share your concern about tiny campaignboxes, but IMHO these will not be tiny (except maybe the spanish one).  This box is already getting unmanageably large, and subordinate boxes (italian, and rebellion) are getting fairly beefy.  I think some organization is needed so readers can follow the back-and-forth of a single front, without having to bounce between battles on other fronts.  ?Meh?  Gomm 21:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: (On a related note: it may be better to have such organizational discussions at the Napoleonic task force, rather than on the individual templates' talk pages, which are watched by extremely few people.) Kirill Lokshin 21:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This definitely needs a breakup now. I would go for the above solution by campaign. Shire Lord 13:58, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  separate boxes for each campaign?
Talk:Caroline Kaufer

message: I understand that there is some concern about the notablity of Caroline Kaufer. I've added some more references to the article and believe that it now meets Wikipedia criteria for notability. The Kaufer Fund gives money to research a very rare form of cancer, and the donation was quite large--over $1 million. These two facts together give a great deal of notablity to Ms. Kaufer. In addition, the Fund continues to fund cancer research meaning that its importance is not a one-off event limited to 2005.
As far as citations, I've expanded this. There are two independent articles that deal with the Kaufer Fund donations: Paretsky and Ruder. There is the obituary in a national newspaper, The Jewish Advocate. And there are, so far, four references in publications of leading cancer research institutes to the Kaufer Fund donations. 
I believe that the article meets the three criteria of Wikipedia content policy: verifiability, neutral point of view, and no original research. ("Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's three content policies. The other two are Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view." Formal verification) Given that notablity is a content guideline rather than a content policy, I think that this article passes the test for inclusion in Wikipedia. Interlingua  talk email 00:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Violence/Archive 1

message: The current article lists Mutilation and genital mutilation in the "See also" section.  Is there a consensus that the line should remain?
*In my opinion it should stay. Information about male and female circumcision would be in the linked articles, not in Violence. -- DanBlackham 08:10, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: See also - Mutilation and genital mutilation

message: The current article does not list National Organization to Halt the Abuse and Routine Mutilation of Males in the "External links" section?  Is there a consensus that the link to the NOHARMM web site should not be added?
*In my opinion it should not be added.  A link to NOHARMM would be more appropriate in the genital mutilation article. As Vina noted above the other external links are directly related to violence. -- DanBlackham 08:10, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: External links - NOHARMM

message: I am Wookiebaca, and I found some things in some earlier subjects (i.e. circumcision is violent) that are misinterpeted. 
1. The main point of circumcision is to cause pain.
That is not true. the main point of a circumcision is to cut off some skin because if left on, small amounts of urine will collect and cause the whole area to become infected.Pain is just a side effect. It's just like freezing off warts, which I have experienced. 
2. Anything that includes tying down infants and causing them pain is violence. Hmmmm... ever hear of giving babies vaccines? They get tied down then and get pain, but then why aren't you complaining about that? 
Also, did anyone consider anything about religious matters? The Christians do it, and my parents had me circumcised because they are Christian. Also, mutilate is too strong a word. According toWebster's New World Dictionary of the American Language mutilation is: 1. to cut off or damage a limb or other important part of a person or animal 2. to damage, injure, or otherwise make imperfect, esp. by removing essential part or parts. It is the flesh that it is connected to that is important, and mine works fine, so unless it's like a back-alley thing, I see no problem with it. Also, it's deeply rooted in tradition because it saved countless people from getting horrible infections. )--Wookiebaca 04:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgeries to Infants 

message: I'm Inviting you for starting a wide and deep discussion with "Inter-relationships of Circumcision and religious extremism " on a philosophical,Bio-logical,Psycho analitical and theological context.
Sumudu G.Guruge-21st January 2007 ,Artist/Peace activist/Indipendent peace researcher/Thinker. 195.50.89.236 12:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Inter-relationships of circumcision and religious extremism'''
Template talk:Cycling squad rider

message: Hi, has someone considered changing the fixed widths, especially of the "Rider" column, perhaps making is smaller. The tables produced by these templates look really odd, because the of the wide Rider column. Perhaps it's size can be left unspecified and rather try and fix the D.O.B. column which has a predicable width. --Deon Steyn 13:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width 

message: Some of the pages showing this template are being altered to show shirts indicating tour wins.  There is clearly no mandate for it here, and I can't find any other discussion establishing a consensus in favour.  It seems to me to be contrary to the nature of a team listing (show the people, give an overview of age distribution and geographical spread of the squad); the achievements of individual cyclists are in their own articles.  There is no key, so it is not helpful to non-specialist readers.  There is no equivalent on team/squad lists for other teams: there are no little images of World Cup winners' medals on the Juventus F.C. and Italy national football team squad lists by Gianluigi Buffon's name.  If there is an established consensus, please direct me to it: otherwise, do we have agreement that there is little benefit in them?  Kevin McE (talk) 21:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the shirts do not belong there. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shirts in team lists

message: Currently, the "Date of birth" column is too small (at least at my screen), and the text sometimes gets wrapped, for example "March 26, 1968 " on one line and "(age 40)" on the next line. For other dates, for example "June 2, 1969 (age 39)", the text fits on one line, and there is no wrapping.
This gives a strange look on pages as Cervélo TestTeam: in the Team roster, both columns show 12 riders, but the left column is larger. Is there a smart way to solve this? --EdgeNavidad (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Width of "Date of birth" column
Talk:Ida Copeland

message: This may be the memorial window referred to in the article; it may also be described by Peter Beacham (2014) as "by J. Hall, a striking angel at the empty tomb".--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorial window 

message: The lead section concludes by stating that  Ida Copeland "was one of the earliest women to join Parliament, sitting as a Conservative MP for Stoke on Trent from 1931–35". I think this claim is stretching the idea of earliest to the point where it could be argued to be misleading. She was elected nearly 13 years after Constance Markievicz (who admittedly never took her seat), and 12 years after Nancy Astor. Indeed by the time Copeland was elected several women had served in the house of commons, many elected in the 1920s. Indeed Margaret Bondfield had served as a cabinet minister, and Copeland's predecessor as Stoke's MP had been a woman, Lady Cynthia Mosley. If the statement is trying to say that she was one of the earliest Conservative MPs, then a) the wording does not make this clear, and b) this is still a debatable use of "earliest" given that Astor was elected as a Conservative in 1919 and following that 3 other Conservative women had served in Parliament in the 1920s, notably the Duchess of Atholl who had been elected in 1923 and had held junior ministerial office. Also Copeland was one of a group of 13 Conservative women in parliament after the 1931 election. My instinct is to remove the "one of the earliest women to join Parliament" claim, but would like to seek other views.Dunarc (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious statement in article lead
Talk:Zárate–Brazo Largo Bridge

message: In order to get from Zárate to Brazo Largo, you actually need to use two (almost
identical) bridges. The first bridge brings you onto an island, and the second one
out of the island. Also use this reference:
201.35.250.64 22:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's considered one single bridge because even in the island the road is build elevated. --201.231.165.201 03:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are actually two bridges 

message: I am not sure exactly what does it mean that "it is one of only two such bridges over the Paraná" when in fact there are 4 cable-stayed bridges crossing the Paraná, being the others (appart from Rosario-Victoria) the General Manuel Belgrano and the San Roque González de Santa Cruz (pages in Wikipedia already). I guess that should be fixed, unless I am mistaken. Reinsalkas (talk) 13:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other such bridges over the Paraná
Talk:Wood-fired oven

message: I believe the standard temperature for a Naples-style, pizza is 750-800 F.  The wording is confusing as the high end is given and then it is stated that it is the standard temperature.  Also, it can be confusing as to what is meant by temperature.  A standard oven measures the temperature just above the dome in the refractory element--CSvBibra 00:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Why add the "citation needed" at the statement "The mass of the oven acts as a 'thermal battery', which slowly releases heat over time" ??
This is elementary physics, if not common sense.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.23.208.122 (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elementary 

message: Is there a special name for the 'pizza stone on a long handle', I've seen them called pizza paddles. Is that a common name? 202.78.240.7 (talk) 07:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: * http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&um=1&newwindow=1&sa=1&q=portable+pizza+oven&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&start=0
* http://www.perthwoodfired.com.au/
--222.64.208.212 (talk) 04:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portable models.... 

message: plus
* tree leaves
* Charcoals
* gas
* electronic
etc.  If can not have all, a combination of two or three will help for the convenience of outdoor where there is lack of either of the above--222.64.208.212 (talk) 04:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love to see the portable pizza ovens with various burning sources.... 

message: Can someone have a look at Draft:Mobile Wood Fired Oven and see if parts of it can be merged here? Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 00:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile Wood Fired Oven
Talk:Violence/Archive 2

message: This article is listed as a stub.  Given that the nature of the topic itself begs for a dictionary definition with links to articles on types of violence, and since that's what we've got here, can we consider removing the stub designation?  I.e., how much on the notion of violence itself, in the abstract, can be written here?  GeeZee 21:18, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just divided the topic a bit, I feel quite a bit can be said on the sociology of violence, or it's place in the media, etc. How about removing the "stub" and adding an "needs attention" template ? I found this page as it was top of the list of wikipedia:most wanted stubs.  Flammifer 08:15, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbiness 

message: I went ahead and added a paragraph about violence in today's culture. I don't think I did it justice, and expansion of this aspect of violence would be appreciated.
Note that this isn't necessarily to the United States' opinion on violence, but possibly the way violence is viewed abroad.
Caeonosphere 21:26, 9 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Additions 

message: How is "moral relativism typically associated with nationalism"? I would think it would be the opposite, if anything. Zafiroblue05 00:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd paragraph
Talk:Rapist

message: If there's going to be a specification for "male", shouldn't there be a specification for "female"?Murderbike 00:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Removal of "female" specification

message: The section on categorizing female rapists seems to rely exclusively on statutory rape.  Was this intentional?  Perhaps it should be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.30.72 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female rapist classification 

message: The why section is incoherent and useless.  There are all sorts of excellent studies and research on this issue, and yet this section reads like a bunch of random speculation that an alien could come up with out of pure common sense in trying to explain things.   Wikipedia can do better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.206.11 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, YOU can do better. Be bold, and do the research, fix the article, and cite your sources. This article IS in need of help, YOURS! Murderbike 04:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: #REDIRECT Rape
Luis Americo Yanque is a rapist, as well as a diagnosed anti-social/sociopathic personality. 
What this known personality disorder suffers from (which is unfortunately; is also incurable),is one of the rarest forms of mental disorders.
This is the same disorder that was made famous in "Silence of the Lambs", (Hannibal Lector, and in recent history; Scott Peterson, with the Lacy Peterson murder), he is one of the thousands that is both documented and suffers from this incurable disease.
Rape - Overview; War & Libert, Jilliun A. Robertson
Professor of Law, Cal Hu University, "Substantive Criminal Law & Forum" 976-979 (3d ed. 2007)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.140.67 (talk) 04:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Farzaneh Aghaeipour

message: I am not a board member of Iranian Writers Association. Farzaneh Aghaeipour (talk) 11:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies

message: I'm not convinced of her notability based on the present version of the article, but instead of proding or afding it now, I've tagged it  and will give it some more time. Picaroon 00:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anglican Diocese of Armidale

message: Although the Diocese is predominantly evangelical now, it was not always thus. Until the mid 1980s, there was a mixture of churchmanship throughout the parishes.
I disagree with the statement, "Similar to the Dioceses of Sydeny and North West Australia...". Armidale has a much broader evangelical outlook than those dioceses. For example, in 2008, the Archbishop of Sydney (and the  Sydney regional bishops) and the Bishop of NW Australia boycotted the Lambeth Conference. The Bishop of Armidale attended. Anglicant (talk) 07:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evangelical 

message: I have added the Bishops of the former Diocese of Grafton and Armidale.
I have also added H.E Cooper to the list of Bishops of Armidale, as he was definitely designated the "First Bishop of Armidale". Check the board in St Peter's Cathedral.
W.F. Wentworth-Shields signed his name "Wentworth Armidale" on my grandmother's confirmation certificate, so I have added his first Christian name as it was definitely what he used. Anglicant (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified list of bishops 

message: I have changed the description of the relationship of the diocese to the Anglican schools, as "responsible for the administration of..." was misleading and incorrect. 
NEGS is now a privately owned school with some sort of diocesan affiliation. TAS has a different structure as well.
The day-to-day administration of Calrossy (and TAS and NEGS)  lies with the principal. Anglicant (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diocesan schools
Talk:Club Z

message: this page was deleted on 03:09, 23 December 2006 Pilotguy (Talk | contribs) deleted "Club Z" (Deleting page - reason was: "Nonsense page"  --Hu12 00:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag itself says "This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion. The given reason is: It is reposted content that was deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) discussion. (CSD G4)" It was never on AFD. It's not nonsense. It's a re-direct. If you want it deleted, but put on AFD. GreenJoe 02:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Blind justice (concept)

message: Tagged for cleanup. Wording is very ambiguous and poorly organized. This article could use grammatical revision.
-Fahooglewitz1077 00:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

message: There isn't really any substantiated content on the article, perhaps it is better to merge with justice -Reconsider the static (talk) 12:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Spero Dedes

message: I've seen there have been quite a bit of edits to Spero's page... so let me paint some broad strokes here...
Spero called the 2006 Texas Bowl.  He repeatedly and erroneously misidentified Rutgers.  A LOT of Rutgers personnel, both students and alumni, already upset with the NFL Network's handling of the game, were highly incensed about this.
The information I presented, after discussing with Zoe, was presented in a neutral, factual way, with cites by a Rutgers beat reporter and a Rutgers blogger, both employees of the Star-Ledger, New Jersey's largest newspaper.
Although the information is negative, it is reflective of Spero's career.  It is not an attack, nor is it personal information. MattyFridays 00:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is easily verifiable with the references given. --ElectricEye (talk) 12:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So what?  Is everything anyone says going to be reported on WP?  Steve Dufour 14:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even read the article?  He's 26 years old and is doing play-by-play for the Lakers.  That is DEFINITELY notable enough for a WP Bio.  This was a national broadcast.  I'm sure as Spero's career grows, it will be noted for other things that he did, but this was factual, neutral information about an occurrence that happened on a nationwide stage.  Yes, it's negative, but it's notable for a bio.  We aren't just puppydogs and flowers here.  MattyFridays 15:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 Texas Bowl 

message: :If talking on the radio and TV on a regular basis doesn't make for good WP material, please feel free to nominate Opie and Anthony, Rick Dees, Rush Limbaugh, Marv Albert, and John Sterling for deletion. MattyFridays 15:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is notable. Look at my version. Cleanup, copyedit, contribution, etc. encouraged. Thanks! ^_^--ElectricEye (talk) 04:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again E.E. I voted to keep the article.  Unless anyone objects we could remove the tag. Steve Dufour 19:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Template talk:Cycling team rider

message: Wouldn't using  be more elegant? No need for nbsps, no need for piping in riders' names. GregorB 18:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, seems like a good idea. How does that work with disambiguated names though, such as Robert Hunter (cyclist) so that it only reads as Robert Hunter? SeveroTC 19:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would work the same as now (i.e. with pipes). Nowrap pertains to displayed text only. GregorB 19:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done nice one, backwards compatible on those templates using nbsps so it has sorted all of them. SeveroTC 19:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. Made a minor change to the template so that pipe is inside nowrap; works the same. I was about to suggest updating the example above, but I see now you have been quick... GregorB 19:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nowrap?

message: In the same vein as what I did with , I've created a navbox version of this set of templates. See  for details. As a test conversion, I switched  over to it - check out the before, after, and diffs to see how it looks. This should greatly simplify and standardize this set of templates, IMO. If nobody objects I'll swap the rest over to using it in a little while. Bryan Derksen 23:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Navbox version

message: I opened a discussion about having this template for every team every year. Please reply here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cycling#Cycling team templates Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Template for every year
Talk:Duarte Pacheco Pereira

message: This article does not state any source for the "recent research" that shows he discovered Brazil before Colombus. Gdo01 00:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Colombus never discovered Brazil... You mean Pedro Álvares Cabral. The Ogre 16:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I meant America. Gdo01 01:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: If you read much about early European exploration of the Americas, you soon learn (much to your weariness) that the Portuguese have claimed to discover everything. Just kept it a secret, or the Lisbon earthquake destroyed all the records, and so on.  Mainstream historians buy very little of it.  69.108.230.116 15:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Although the claim about Pereira describing chimpanzees using tools is confirmed by some sources, like this one for example, the only possible description of an ape in Esmeraldo de Situ Orbis (1506) is in Chapter 33 which is about Sierra Leone and where Pereira says:
:
It's not entirely clear that Pereira is actually describing a chimpanzee and there is no mention of them using tools. Alansplodge (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chimpanzees
Talk:House of Trouser

message: *Someone had put that this page should be deleted which is ridiculous. I am however very happy to see it merged it someone would do that. Happy New Year! Cls14 00:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I have redirected this page to Ramsay Street after discovering that it contains the exact same information from the 30 Ramsay Street section. It does not need a seperate article to itself. - JuneGloom07  Talk?  19:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect