lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Japanese bondage

message: Does anyone know what is this thing on the woman's nose?  Is this a Japanese invention?  I only tend to see it in Japanese erotica.  What is its name and history?  AlexQ 22:05, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nose thingy

message: There was a messy article on "shibari" before I turned Shibari into a redirect here. Click on that first link and you'll land on the page, as it was. There could be something useful there that isn't here; it's all GFDL, so go for it. -- Hoary 07:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More material for y'all

message: :Moved from WT:Policies and guidelines Johnuniq (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purposed change to definition shibari 

message: We really need to describe the different Shibari figures (postures / ties) that are enumerated. For most of them, we see their name - for example "futomomo" - but there is no description of what a futomomo is, or looks like. (it's a tie in which the leg is bent) There is also no translation. (it means "fat thigh") We should look into that for each of the terms listed. AlexandreQuessy (talk) 05:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Describing the figures 

message: It would be useful if there was more historical background info in this page. AlexandreQuessy (talk) 05:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More historical background 

message: SNMKURAMA 24.166.254.120 (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNMKURAMA
Talk:Civilization (video game)

message: *https://web.archive.org/web/20001204134100/http://www.gamespot.com:80/features/sidlegacy/civi.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBlackwing (talk • contribs) 04:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Can we correct, clarify, or remove some of the sections of this article that talk about the game's release date? Because they're all over the place!
The first para says 1991, and the infobox says September 1991, but then we get:
* "Civilization was released in early 1991" at the end of Development at MicroProse (completely uncited)
* Reception cites a preview of the game published in December 1991!!
Surely they can't all be true?! --MysteriousBoron (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date confusion?
Talk:Nintendo Entertainment System

message: If anyone knows how to fix the infobox, it is not displaying correctly, at least not on my mobile phone.66.91.36.8 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 08:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox not displaying correctly 

message: Hola a todos sólo quería decir que mi Hijo menor, que ya tiene 27 años, de nombre Luigy finalmente encontró a su Mario. Luigy está saliendo con un muchacho que se llama Mario. Son de lo más lindos los dos. Hacen una bonita pareja. 2600:1700:6F10:76C0:FCC3:EEAA:1761:7BA5 (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mário & Luigy 

message: which company distrubuted the NES in West Germany, can anyone tell me? Hewwoh (talk) 21:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In West Germany
Talk:Node

message: Why was link to Node (music) removed ?  I reinserted it here.  Hreinn (talk) 02:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That article is almost certainly going to be deleted unless you do something pretty spectacular with it right now.  I would advise you to concentrate on that first. SpinningSpark 13:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Node (music)
Talk:Mixcoatl

message: I can't find any sources that corroborate the statement that Mixcoatl fathered either Coyolxauhqui or the Centzonuitznauna. Where is this assertion coming from?
I understand that there might be some reason to believe there would be mythological tension between him and Huitzilopochtli...but I'm not just finding it the literature.
Festina Lente (talk) 13:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to Coyolxauhqui and the Centzonuitznauna?

message: >"While Mixcoatl was part of the Aztec pantheon, his role was less important than that of Huitzilopochtli, who was their central deity."
Thats funny because the Mexica's principal god was Huitzilpochtli, while the people of Texcoco was Tezcatlipoca, and the Acolhua was Huehueteotl. All of these groups of people make up what we call "Aztec". It was only the Mexica whose central deity was Huitzilpochtli. In fact in the codex Borgia, theres no Coatlicue or Huitzilpochtli, Huit is replaced by Mixcoatl. I would hesitate to make Mixcoatl sound less important than he really is.
Xuchilbara 17:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixcoatl

message: Much of the text as it stands now is a pretty close (I would say, uncomfortably so) paraphrase of the entry on Mixcoatl in Miller and Taube's The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya (1993, pp.115–116); a fact I've just noticed after comparing the two. It seems it was essentially expanded from this source in this anon 2005 edit- there are a couple of words and changes of emphasis that are different, but it's unmistakably derived and follows the same structure. While Miller & Taube is an excellent and generally reliable source, I would say the article prose needs some significant refashioning to avoid the impression of being a direct lift. Bringing in some other sources for contrast and comparision would also be desirable. Will see if this can't be addressed in the next little while. --cjllw ʘ TALK 04:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some copy problems 

message: Is it revolving around the axes or revolving around the axis? Seems like it should be the second one. Spiel (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axes 

message: What are t-shirt feathers? This phrase appears repeatedly, but makes no sense. Does anyone know, is it supposed to be "tail feathers?" Xolochi (talk) 06:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-shirt feathers?
Talk:Wang tile

message: Materialscientist has reverted my edit to Wang tile which included an external link to a generator of infinite minimal Wang tilings. The external link contributes to the understanding of the article. The external link visually demonstrates what is discussed in the article but cannot be included within the article itself because it is a HTML5/Javascript demonstration of a Wang Tile. It is similar to the second external link which is also a HTML5/Javscript demonstration, in this case a naive demonstration of a different Wang tileset. However, the new external link which I included in my edit demonstrates a different tiling, the minimal tiling discussed in the first image on the page. And it does so non-naively, showing an actual valid infinite tiling.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charming Computer (talk • contribs) 22:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not possible to compute functions? Can you prove that for me? >:-) --67.172.99.160 00:03, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hierarchical visitor pattern

message: I am ignorant of software development, but I have this comment on grammar:
I would guess that "hierarchical visitor pattern" means either
* A visitor pattern that is hierarchical
or
* A pattern that involves a "hierarchical visitor".
I don't know which it is.  But if the latter, then there should be a hyphen, thus: "hierarchical-visitor pattern".  If the former, then there should be no hyphen.    -- Mike Hardy
See the definition in the article about my understanding. I think the grammar is incorrect. But I think it happens frequently in computer science, so it may be okay. -- Taku 22:14 Jan 3, 2003 (UTC)
----
As I understand it, a "normal" visitor pattern is already hierarchical and works on structures like trees.
So what is special about hierarchical visitor patterns?
--zeno 11:36, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The article originally contained a load of material copied from somewhere else. That has been removed, and now the article is vacuous. Leibniz 19:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK.  How do we propose this page for deletion, then?  (Somebody who knows wikipedia better than me, please help.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.170.62 (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

text:  Yeah, the page is useless in its current form. The linked WikiWikiWeb talks about stateful tree traversal (such as keeping track of the current depth) and skipping subtrees when traversing. There's no need for a separate pattern, with a confusing name, for those things (they should be considered part of the "standard" visitor pattern). I will redirect this page to visitor pattern. --Cic (talk) 21:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nabis (art)

message: Where does the word "Nabi" come from? I don't know any such word in French; the closest word I know to "Nabi" is the Hebrew and Arabic word for "prophet". -phma
Janson claims that the name is from the Hebrew Nabi, and considering the fascination of the artistic movement in question with Biblical imagery, such as Salome, it would make sense to be Biblically inspired. Where is the source that they were named after the Arabic word? What is the connection to Arabic? Tiberian Hebrew and Modern Hebrew both pronounce the word as Navi. However, when Romanized a "b" is used (much as the second letter of modern Greek is transliterated "beta" and not "vita"). 
I am changing it to Hebrew.
Egasterium is supposed to be ergasterium....I think. Please change it back if it is the former. (Unsigned post).
:Verkade himself talks about 'der Kreis der Nabis oder besser "Nebiim", wie der Plural dieses Wortes eigentlich heisst' - that is, 'the circle of the Nabis, or rather "Nebiim", as the plural of this word should properly be'. (Willibrord (Jan) Verkade, Die Unruhe zu Gott (Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau 1930 Edition), p. 67.) Does that help? I have read somewhere that it means The Prophet(s). Eebahgum (talk) 22:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: etymology

message: ... some more recent, more serious art historical informations (I supply only one of some important reference works), and a little more discipline in quoting, supplying references? Is it so difficult to sign? --rpd (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's about... 

message: I am going to be adding more sections, text and images;  I think galleries will be needed for each section, since the images will otherwise spill into the later sections. Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galleries 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Les Nabis →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME.  See recent discussion at Talk:Nabis of Sparta.  "Les Nabis" is a French-language rendering which is not predominantly used by English-language reliable sources.  Note that this also affects :Category:Les Nabis. 162 etc. (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 March 2024
Talk:Andrew Carnegie

message: Andrew was born and raised in Scotland to Scottish parents and only move to America when he was 13-14, he’s not Scottish-American just Scottish. 77.197.126.86 (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @77.197.126.86 nope Matteow101 (talk) 14:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not American  

message: For the David Nasaw citations, there are pages that go up to the thousands, but "Andrew Carnegie" by David Nasaw only has around 900 page. I think clarification on these citations would be helpful! Probscheatin (talk) 21:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Nasaw Citations 

message: Change: American to Scottish 46.64.82.210 (talk) 15:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Per MOS:NATIONALITY, we should use the country he was resident in when he became notable. Liu1126 (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2023
Talk:Zonal (Earth sciences)

message: Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  -- Zoe
----
Granted, but since it is a technical term, keeping the entry doesn't seem to do much harm. But I have another complaint: is the notation (x,u) really THE standard notation in atmospheric sciences, or is it just the convention used in some parent article? (If the latter, it should be defined there, not here.) I am not of that field, but recall seeing φ and θ for lat/lon in some papers...Jorge Stolfi 04:04, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: x is used to represent the zonal distance (e.g., in meters or kilometers), while φ and/or λ represent longitude (an angle). Oftentimes it is more convenient to write some equations in terms of a linear distance rather then the product of the trig function of some angle. x can be easily be related to latitude and longitude by the relation dx=a cos(lat) d(lon), where a is the radius of the Earth. -Loren 06:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Diarrhea

message: Like di-a-rrhea. Iike the “a” connected the two words!! I don’t know if im right or if you’re right because they both TECHNICALLY make sense, but I think that “double-flow” makes a lot more sense than “through-flow.” I dunno, just this humble boy’s opinion! 😉😀
And if you go to the merriam webster medical dictionary you’ll see that “Di” does, in fact, mean “two” or “double.” Jkeller0009 (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Di sans the “a” actually means “two” or “double” and I always read the word diarrhea as “double”-flow. 

message: I noticed that the section at the end that was called "etymology" is now called "terminology". I like that but should we make that a general change for all disease-type articles? Note that in the manual of style it says "etymology", see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles#Etymology Also, I suggest to move terminology up to be part of the section on definition. It looks a bit arbitrary where it currently is at the very end. EMsmile (talk) 07:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology versus etymology as a section heading? 

message: I saw your edit. I often post descriptions about Somalia to Wikipedia. The main sources of information I use are news sites. The word AWD sometimes appears in Somali news without explanation. (For example, reliefweb, WHO.) One can look up that AWD is an abbreviation for acute watery diarrhoea, but this meaning is not clear to those without medical knowledge. The difference between acute diarrhea and acute watery diarrhoea may not be important information for doctors, but for those who are interested in healthcare in poor countries, it is important to note the meaning of AWD in Diarrhea's article. It doesn't have to be exactly as I described, but could you please allow me to include information about AWD in this article?--Freetrashbox (talk) 12:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I suppose the use of this term is important. I have restored the definition of AWD and a WHO source that includes cholera.Jrfw51 (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!--Freetrashbox (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of AWD 

message: I have some improvement suggestions but don't have time to make them myself in the near future: 
* Just wondering if the lead image could be different, maybe less "medical"/sciency/microscopic? 
* The sentences that include figures (epidemiology) should be updated. 
* Recheck the section on sanitation; perhaps link better with the WASH#Health_aspects section (I've added a link to it now). EMsmile (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: the picture should be removed and not replaced with anything 68.8.117.213 (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some thoughts on further improvements
Talk:Elias Disney

message: According to this article, Elias Disney married Flora Call on January 1, 1888, in Acron, Florida. However, according to the Lake County, Florida article, they married in Kismet, Florida on December 27, 1887. Which is correct? -- azumanga (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date and town of marriage
Talk:Transcription

message: For beginners the page has neither - perhaps a basic overview of what transcription is and how it works would be beneficial. - ben
I am refering to the genetic transcription page.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.248.82.158 (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity and simplicity 

message: I believe it is appropriate to use the term 'written,' despite non-phonetic uses such as genetic and technological. This is because both of those mediums metaphorically refer to writing (the DNA code involves lettering; data is written to disk). Again, I urge that the use of "Item W may refer to XYZ" be discontinued where possible, as it is essentially meaningless and there are usually much better replacements involving brief definitions – which are not prohibited (refer WP:DABSTYLE, "Start each list with a short introductory sentence fragment" and the linked MOS page, MOS:DAB.
Specifically, due to historical precedent I believe "Transcription (linguistics)" to be in some ways the most prominent (or in a way, "sub-primary" topic) as it has been around the longest; therefore MOS:DABPRIMARY applies over MOS:DABINT for generic introductory lines. Techhead7890 (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small definition and "written copy" 

message: فوتشوب 37.239.167.23 (talk) 04:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ترجمه
Talk:10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

message: Surely U.S forces is notable for its own article Series premiere (remake) (talk) 13:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable enough for own article? 

message: For some reason, although the songs' composers show in the source text, they do not appear on the webpage.
:fixed Dan arndt (talk) 02:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisible writers
Talk:Marjorie Merriweather Post

message: The article doesn't seem to cover Post's diplomatic career. 
https://www.state.gov/dipnote-u-s-department-of-state-official-blog/the-diplomatic-legacy-of-marjorie-merriweather-post/
Fieldlab (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing diplomatic aspect
Talk:Loss of supply

message: I just removed the following from the article:
*Fierce opposition to Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott's controversial 2014 Australian federal budget resulted in supply blocked by a hostile Senate composed of a large number of crossbench senators, including members of the Australian Greens and Palmer United Party who rejected several spending measures of the budget twice, causing a trigger for Abbott to call for the dissolution of Parliament. Senator Nick Xenophon described the budget as "mean, nasty and dumb". Independent MP Andrew Wilkie implored the opposition and crossbench MPs to go so far as to block supply in his opposition to the budget.
Obviously the Senate didn't actually block supply, so if its not vandalism what's it trying to say? Colonial Overlord (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this vandalism or just poorly worded? 
Talk:Watt steam engine

message: The article is looking good, although a few more images wouldn't go amiss.  (For example, Crofton? a rotative beam engine?)
However, the main problem is that it is currently devoid of references.
EdJogg 00:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed

message: I like the spelling of "grammar".--John of Paris (talk) 18:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest edit summary
Talk:Public relations

message: — Assignment last updated by Xinyue Hu (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160B

message: — Assignment last updated by GarrisonCalmerDighton (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Communication

message: There is a lot of great research being done by critical cultural scholars. It would be great for that to be represented. Tiggeritian (talk) 01:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical public relations research 

message: Several of the definitions of public relations, including both those from PRSA and the CIPR one (which I added to the article recently) use the word "publics" in the plural. This is an odd usage, and probably needs an explanation. 
There is a discussion of this in "Key Concepts in Public Relations" (Franklin et al, 2009) but since I am an author of that I didn't want to add a citation of my own work. 
I would suggest something such as:
According to Quentin Langley in Franklin et al the use of the word "publics" in the plural is "central to the understanding" of public relations. Langley writes "all organisations have a series of publics, or stakeholders, on whom their success depends". He then follows Hayward (1991) in dividing the publics into "customers (past, present, and future),staff (past, present, and future), investors (past, present, and future), politicians and regulators, neighbours, and business partners (suppliers, distributors, etc.)".
Langley also goes on to contest the marketing concept of seeing public relations as part of marketing, which he claims is too focused on just one of Hayward's six publics: customers. 
https://sk.sagepub.com/books/key-concepts-in-public-relations/n124.xml 
Franklin et al (2009), Key Concepts in Public Relations. London: Sage. 
Hayward, R, (1991), All About Public Relations: how to build business success on good communications. London: McGraw Hill. Qlangley (talk) 14:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Publics" in "Definitions"
Talk:Amazon rainforest

message: I would like for the following change to be made in the section about the 2019 fires:
2019 has long since come and gone. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Your version is easier to follow. Thank you. Deauthorized. (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 July 2023 

message: The redirect The Amazon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  fgnievinski (talk) 01:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Amazon]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Given that the Amizon is basically gone toatly  at this point... 216.122.155.62 (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it's shrinking, it still does exist. Rasnaboy (talk) 08:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should probably change that first sentence to "was". 

message: Originally, the infobox only had Spanish and Portuguese translations of "Amazon rainforest." Now, we've added Dutch, as that is spoken in the Surinamese Amazon. Should we add French, considering the presence of French Guiana? Or would this make it too cluttered? Zoozoor (talk) 04:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages in infobox
Talk:Maude Flanders

message: Grandma said, "Once you have a lion by the tail you should offer him some pie."
:o...k.... On with this wikipedia business. Re:Jumping the Shark. According to a pole on http://jumptheshark.com Maudes death is in the top three of when the program jumped with 138 votes. But, the option Never Jumped is scoring 1,592 votes. http://www.jumptheshark.com/s/simpsons.htm Quite a minority me thinks. KevinCarmody 02:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)