lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Comment

message: :We have been through the loop of having this text moved back and forth as a selfref entry. This information is not important enough to warrant being at the top of the page.
I see no reference of this "loop" in the talk page.  The topic in the self-ref is related to commenting and computer programming and is probably something somebody might look up.  I always seem to be looking this up because I use it frequently enough for it to be annoying to repeatedly look it up and infrequently enough so that I forget it.  It's intuitive to look up something like WP:COMMENT or Wikipedia:Commenting or How do I comment out text on Wikipedia? (assuming that maybe the text of this question will turn up in a search), but of course, none of these work.  It is not very intuitive to type in Wikipedia:How to edit a page#Character formatting.  This topic is related but not explicitly stated in the article, therefore is appropriate for the self ref.  Ufwuct 03:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Loop

message: Shame on the railway authority of Jammu for the intentional late running of the train sir really shame on u i always found that the running station of 19224 is jammu but u never realease it on time if u will be in front of me i will throw my shoe on u if u hve shame die in water of .................................  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.255.252.182 (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Running Late Train from u 

message: Hiw can you be so biassed? 121.98.56.207 (talk) 04:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the control of your mind and the future chu=ildren you produce wi fall in line and believe the narrative that they are smarter than you. The mind machine is driving the thoguhts of all young people, regardeless of the level of schooling you purchase. The spelling errors on poipusse. 2600:1700:5F0:2630:C96E:9E89:2F40:586D (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can you be so biassed and deliberately cause such harm?
Talk:Structural analog

message: The examples listed at the bottom of the page don't say what they are analogues for, or whether they are analogues for one another. The pages linked for methanol and silanol don't use the word analog at all (although the page for silane does mention that silanol is analogous to alcohols). If I'm intuiting correctly, the only thing that really needs to be done is a line break between the alcohols and amphetamines, making it clear that the page is saying silanol is an analog for methanol, and the three amines are analogs.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.215.235 (talk) 04:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it's fixed now. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: I added another use of the term. The definition I put down is actually the way I've heard it used most frequently. Maybe my definition should be the main definition. Maybe not though, I'm not too sure. If any of you also think so then feel free to edit it. I'm just going to leave it as it is myself though. Jamesters 18:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Unititled]

message: Bellow a Omnipaedista's deleted text that I will put back... Please, comment/discuss here before and NOT DELETE after. The correct Wikipedia's procedure is to show here, at talk page, what is wrong... Chemistry not have the monopoly of the term "Structural analog".  --Krauss (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add other uses
Talk:Chyah airstrike

message: Please don't move a page without reaching a consensus on  a talk page.Shrike 18:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:McGriddle

message: the McGriddles was first brought into McDonald chains in 1998, based on a recipe first invented during the reign of Caligula.
Changed fat content to reflect amounts on McDonalds nutrition info page.
-AC 70.21.167.211 16:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Fat is in grams?  I assume so but no indication? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.104.85.83 (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No units for fat
Talk:Burgeranch

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support as nom. The English spelling of the Israeli Burger Ranch is two words.  The Hebrew spelling is one word.  Therefore, the article's name should be Burger Ranch (Israel), not Burgeranch.  The only way I'd doubt this is if you can can show me a Burgeranch logo where the store's name is spelled Burgeranch in English. Milchama 18:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The article says, "Eventually Burger King Israel went bankrupt." Does this mean that there are no longer Burger Kings in Israel? Jecowa 19:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I have found online, in 2003 (that's the latest article I could find ), Burger King is/was in bankrupcy in Israel and had multiple bidders for their restaurants.  The government rejected offers from McDonalds and Burger Ranch.  Not sure how it progressed, though.  Milchama 03:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burger Kings in Israel 

message: I have restored some content to the article, because the content removal did not improve the article and the rationale provided for its removal (wp:not menu) is not a policy or guideline. North America1000 05:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, kashrut related information is very different than menu - GalatzTalk 15:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nb. I also copy edited the Kashrut section and added a source and citations from Stanford University's Department of Economics. North America1000 11:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration

message: User:The Rambling Man, why did you specify MDY date formatting for this article? --Khajidha (talk) 17:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There was "half of one and 50% of the other".  I don't care either way, I just wanted consistency.  Feel free to implement dmy or whatever version you prefer, just please keep it consistent. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm used to MDY, but it seems weird on a non-American subject. --Khajidha (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date format 
Talk:Programmer (disambiguation)

message: Removed:
* The film on the lower half of a double feature bill; a B-movie literally
Never heard of this and it doesn't make sense. Lycurgus 23:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found in linked article, so restoring. Lycurgus 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Reference
Talk:Factory

message: hi
hi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.190.209 (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

message: Hi, I want to know which  Egyptian Pharaoh you are speaking when you say the "Egyptian pharaoh" .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boutarfa Nafia (talk • contribs) 23:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Explain the factory 112.79.234.99 (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.st 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
Talk:Anthorn Radio Station

message: According to the NPL press release and a photo of the sign at the entrance on MB21, this place is known as Anthorn radio station. I propose to move the article accordingly if there are no objections.--Harumphy (talk) 10:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Various sites give different call signs. I've no idea which is correct.
GBZ seems more popular on google searches than GQD. Maddog Battie (talk) 22:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the recent (February 2012) reply send by the MoD to the enquiry of a radio amateur: "... they do not have callsigns since they transmit data and not voice  but instead have 'broadcast designator codes', which are as follows: Anthorn's 'broadcast designator code' is GQD and Skelton's `broadcast designator code' is GZQ." SV1XV (talk) 04:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call Sign 
Talk:Pine Mountain

message: I don't know if it's appropriate, but it seemed proper to link off to the Pine Mountain, Georgia DAB page for the 3 places in Georgia, U.S.A. of the same name. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 18:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems entirely appropriate and was a good idea.  Great work.  Tlmclain  | Talk 18:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to DAB page for [[Pine Mountain, Georgia]]
Talk:Triethylenetetramine

message: Any objections.  I made a related change with ethylenediamine.--Smokefoot 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose to remove space in name: Triethylenetetramine is what most call this
Talk:List of Mother characters

message: removed any unofficial name versions of Giygas/Gyiyg, 21 August 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.155.197.82 (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: remove unofficial name of Gyiyg

message: I've removed reference to the place names in the unofficial english version.  Although most will be familiar with them, they're unofficial and should not be used. 75.153.231.20 03:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: unofficial names

message: y doesn't he get a clay model  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicflames (talk • contribs) 01:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ninten pic
Talk:Michael An Gof

message: according to the Page about the Uprising, it says that they were NOT actually Hung Drawn and Quartered, but were mercifully hung until dead and beheaded.  I don't know which is right.
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a source here, which says that they were. But it's only Steven Morris in The Guardian. I'm sure there will be more authoritative historical sources. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced that source provided by Martinevans123 with a couple of early ones in which you can see the difference in the stories. It seems likely that An Gof and Flamank were sentenced to be hung, drawn and quartered, but that the sentence was modified by the king. Mrmedley (talk) 09:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Gof's fate
Talk:German Mexicans

message: It's an exact copyvio from http://www.soconusco.com/soco/inmi/alemania.html --Andersmusician VOTE 04:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sosonusco section 
Talk:Fay Lanphier

message: I believe this article does satisfy the notability guidelines and should therefore not be removed.  ~EnviroboyTalkContribs - 23:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contesting Speedy Deletion (notability) 
Talk:Library instruction

message: Tomorrow, April 10, 2015, librarians at the Information Literacy Summit 2015 may be editing this page as part of a mini-edit-a-thon. If you see a flurry of edits that is why! Feel free to join in around 3pm CDT. Message me if you have any questions.
Brookfre (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Edit-a-Thon Participation

message: This article needs expanding.  I have added a small bibliography of papers relating to the history of library instruction.  I intend to eventually come back to this article and make some additions.  However, if others want to write this, I suggest consulting these papers to help.  LarryQ 18:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Evaluation and improvement of library instruction Pastbarn (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Library
Talk:List of legendary rulers of Cornwall

message: I propose that the two articles be merged.  Please discuss at Talk:Kingdom of Cornwall#Proposed merger with Legendary Dukes of Cornwall.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In view of the determined opposition this suggestion should be abandoned.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 15:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, done.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with Kingdom of Cornwall
Talk:Burke's Law (1963 TV series)

message: It is quite advisable to split out the 1994–95 revival of this series into a separate article. (I would then advise merging List of Burke's Law episodes (1994 series) (which is misnamed in any case) back into the new article on "Burke's Law (1994 TV series)" which makes more sense as well). If no opposition on this is proffered in the near-term, I will carry out this split perhaps in a month. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting out the 1994 revival 

message: Is it:
* Amos Burke Secret Agent (no punctuation in lead paragraph)
* Amos Burke, Secret Agent (a comma in history section )
* Amos Burke: Secret Agent (a colon on the disambiguation page)
LA (T) @ 22:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I looked up a screenshot of the title card, and there is no punctuation at all. Most other sourcing record it variously: like your last two examples; meanwhile Brooks and Marsh write it as Amos Burke—Secret Agent. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   So what would you use to promote consistency? LA (T) @ 09:38, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  My advice, because of the title card, would be to use no punctuation at all. But because editors will likely be able to find sourcing that uses any of the "with-punctuation" options, I'm not sure the use of punctuation is necessarily "wrong". But without punctuation is probably the most "correct" version IMO... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Changes made, thanks for the sanity check! LA (T) @ 06:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret Agent punctuation 

message: Aaron Spelling produced this show according to the credits on the show itself. Also according to IMDB. Spelling worked at Four Star, so very logical that the credits on the ACTUAL SHOW are accurate. For reasons that are unclear, this fact keeps being reverted. Anyone doubting this needs to watch an episode first, then comment. https://www.decades.com/lists/10-things-you-never-knew-about-burkes-lawhttps://www.mysteryscenemag.com/article/3031-burkes-law It's actually a very interesting fact, given the similarities of the parade of famous guest stars to later Spelling programs. PLawrence99cx (talk) 04:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Produced by Aaron Spelling 

message: If memory serves, Burke explained several times during the original series that, "Daddy bought AT&T at ten."  If anybody has a proper source for this, it would make a good addition to the article.  JDZeff (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The source of his wealth
Talk:Backing track

message: Shouldn't U2 be mentioned under bands using backing tracks? I think they utilize them to do the synth parts on Streets and that sort of thing. The Who also used one to do the sequencing on Baba O Riley and Won't Get Fooled Again.
(208.31.143.2 19:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

message: As the subject says, I changed "acts" to "contestants" to not confuse readers who might think we're referring to a theatrical play division in the part that previously read "[....] that acts  perform only the vocals live to simplify the process of mixing the performance." This can be found on the last paragraph of section 1, titled "Uses" --Fandelasketchup (talk) 12:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed "acts" to "contestants" to not confuse readers who might think we're referring to a theatrical play division
Talk:Stock split

message: What type of Stockholders' cost could be reduced from initiating a reverse split?
* Why do stocks split? Just to allow a larger number of total shareholders?
What are the citations in the text supposed to be pointing towards? Hominidx (talk) 23:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This page does a good job explaining a lot about stock splits, but never actually bothers to explain what it is.
From context, I assume that a 2-for-1 stock split means "everybody owns twice as many shares, which are all worth half as much," but I don't have any way of verifying that in this article.
Hppavilion1 (talk) 09:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what is it?
Talk:Clyde Kennard

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 02:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Dodge Super Bee

message: I am curious, does anyone know if dodge made a "Super Bee" duall 3/4 ton truck, circa 1975. Thanks,  Duane
You may use my dodge superbee pictures from my flickr site: 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikedawson/sets/72157594406337776/
this is the best- http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikedawson/320210259/in/set-72157594406337776/
-- Mike 19:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The writing generally needs improved, grammar included. I don't have the time.--Billymac00 (talk) 03:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved writing
Talk:Quantum finite automaton

message: Its been a while since my CS classes but shouldn't the state machine be listed as:
(1*01*0)*
This (1*01*01*)* expanded would become 1*01*01*1*01*01*... 
1*=1*1* so it seems redundent.
Mdozturk 19:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: typo?

message: The article only states what QFAs are and how they are constructed. It lacks the why.
Some use cases would be cool or the description of problems, which can be solved by those. --RicardAnufriev (talk) 03:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: QFA's are a simplified version of quantum Turing machines, aka quantum computers.  These are currently being studied because some people believe that they might be more efficient than regular computers at solving certain problems (e.g. breaking cryptography).  But mostly, QFA's are studied for the same reason anything in math is studied: cause it is fun -- not because it's useful.  67.198.37.16 (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point or this? Examples? 

message: " After each application of \{U_\alpha\}, though, the column vector q must be renormalized so that it only contains zeros and ones"
This is false, there is no need to normalize q.  As q_j \Sigma_i U_{\alpha_{ij}} > 0 \implies q_j > 0 \land \Sigma_{i} U_{\alpha_{i,j}} > 0. Note the case with negatives is not valid as we we known  U_{\alpha_{ij}} = 0 \lor U_{\alpha_{ij}} = 1 .  Hence it does not matter if q is normalized. --SelfStudyBuddyTALK-- 00:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad information in Informal description
Talk:Graphical Modeling Framework

message: Removed notability template and added link to eclipse editor. This is a feature of a well-known development platform and represents a subset of software functionality that merits independent mention. Categ links also added. dr.ef.tymac 19:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 
Talk:Anthony Salerno

message: Did he die in New York or in Springfield? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.2.18.213 (talk • contribs). 
:Salerno died in Springfield and aws later buried in the Bronx. MadMax 20:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death

message: In the Prison and Death section near the end, it says he was 81 when he died.  Doing the math from his birthday to death, he was 80 when he died, not 81.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.181.43.88 (talk) 23:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was 80 not 81
Talk:List of people from Redding, Connecticut

message: The American pianist, John Kirkpatrick was born on 18th June 1905 in New York City and died in 1991 in Ithaca New York. He was not "from Redding Connecticut" except in the sense that he lived there for a time and made his most famous recording there (Charles Ives' Concord Sonata). He is not the same person as the English accordion player. 
http://hdl.handle.net/10079/fa/music.mss.0056 Ogg 19:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of State Dinosaurs of the United States

message: "Listcruft" is not an actual reason to do anything. If only one state has a state dinosaur this should perhaps be removed as unnecessary, but User:Salad Days has prodded so many lists using the reason "listcruft" that I'm skeptical.--T. Anthony 19:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. I see there is a better list at List of U.S. state dinosaurs.--T. Anthony 19:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Logic System

message: Questions on this article:
#What is the correct name for the concept?  (Hyphenation is very unlikely to be correct.)
#Has anyone other than Mr. Herrmann (aka User:Raherrmann) used this precise formulation?  (If not, it's WP:OR, even if it's otherwise acceptable.)
#What is the distinction between this concept and the general concept of a finitary closure operator, defined inductively by:
#:C(X) is the "limit" (union) of Xi, where:
#:: X_0 = X\ , and
#:: X_{i+1} = X_i \cup \{ y | (\exist R \in \mathbf{RI(L)})(\exist x_0, x_1, \ldots, x_k \in X_i) (x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_k,y) \in R \}
:— Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, the article wouldn't be considered "original research" if it's based on material published by an accepted mathematical publication with appropriate peer review.  You might argue that the material duplicates another article, and therefore the articles should be merged, but the "original research" criteria wouldn't apply if it's appeared in external verifiable publications. Dugwiki 20:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  To be sure this is not original research in the everyday sense of those words. The math is old hat and more commonly known as a formal system (though as Arthur Rubin points out, the formal construction being employed is even more general than that). I think we should just redirect to formal system. Henning Makholm 21:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of roll-on/roll-off vessel accidents

message: I've just checked out all the linked articles and noticed two minor issues.  First, not all of the articles actually state that the ship in question was a roll on/roll off type vessel.  Second, there isn't much style consistency about how the vessel type is typed.  I've seen roll on/roll off, RORO, and ro-ro all used, and possibly some other variation that I've by now forgotten. I truly don't know what the correct form/forms are, but I do know that the inconsistency is kinda irritating.
WasBrendanDoyle (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency among linked articles