lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shigella

message: A number of points in this article are, in my opinion, misleading. For instance, IpaB, C and D (which, by the way, should not be in italics, as they are proteins) are not injected into the cell but IpaC and D form a translocon at the tip of the T3SS while IpaD guides the insertion of them. Altogether around 25 different effector proteins are then secreted into the cell via this complex. I will start correcting this part first unless anyone seriously objects. CharonZ (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading points

message: The picture doesn't make them look very rod-shaped... Evercat (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image accuracy
Talk:Ruben S. Ayala High School

message: There are redlinked references. Can someone check to see if these references are valid in any way? If not, please remove them.
Saiarcot895 (talk) 19:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid References? 

message: Hi Editors!
    To make the page covering Ruben S. Ayala High School more inclusive and holistic, should we also add a section on the school's athletics rather than just focusing on their drama department and band and colorguard? Also, I think API scores are not sufficient enough to represent the overall academics of any high school, so maybe we should add additional statistical information that is relevant to the school's academic performance? Thank you! Lchpj555 (talk) 19:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Rubicon Estate Winery

message: We don't need two article for the same winery.--Kharker 14:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it the same in anything but architecture and location?  If not, it's just two historical businesses at the same address.Wikidemo 19:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the website for Inglenook, it appears to be maintained as a separate entity.  Merging would be confusing and potentially damaging to the reputation of one of the historic businesses, unless valid reasons for such a merging is found in facts stated by citable third party sources.  Just my $0.02 JERRY talk contribs 23:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  Yes, I think they pulled up roots (no pun intended) and moved somewhere else, probably a virtual winery.  It gets down to the question of whether winery articles are primarily about the wines, the place, the vineyards, or the business enterprise.  When a new group takes over a historic winery operation, if they basically keep it the same and continue in the same tradition (despite a possible change of name) then it's the same company.  But I tend to think of California wineries as brands/businesses, so if the new group just buys out the building, facilities, and perhaps the vines, and start making wine in a new way with a new identity (as Coppola has done a few times), I would say it's a different thing.  This doesn't come up very often becuase for the typical notable California estate winery, all four (possibly excepting the grapes) are at the same place.  I suspect the exceptions (virtual wineries, wineries moving around, multiple brands out of one winery, different companies marketing the exact same wine under their own name, multiple wineries per brand, etc.) are usually not notable so we don't have to deal with them often.  Wikidemo 01:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I did some further research.  The Inglenook brand still exists as a relatively popular "value wine" (the lowest category before jug wine) owned by Constellation Brands (which is why someone who is into wine has probably never heard of it).  Cuppola bought the property in chunks from 1975 through 1994, and the succession of owners of the original winery and brand gradually applied the brand to other wines and moved production elsewhere.  Hence Cuppola owns the physical legacy of the winery, but Constellation owns the brand identity.  Under the circumstances it makes sense to treat Inglenook as its own phenomenon, and this discussion seems to have died down, so I am removing the merge tag. Wikidemo 02:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Battle of Smoliani

message: Another very solid start. And you've even got a picture. Napoleon (or the Napoleonic Wars) should be mentioned in the intro, to give this context. LordAmeth 09:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: The article states: 
This doesn't seem right -- Czasniki is about 120 miles from Bobruisk.
Although Bobruisk was important for protecting the southern flank of the French Grande Armée, Victor and Oudinot were tasked with protecting the northern flank, which was in peril following the defeats at Polotsk and Czasniki.
I believe the intended location is Bobr, which is in fact 40 miles south of Czasniki, and on the road between Orsha and Minsk, i.e. its capture would cut off the French path of retreat. This location is named in Minard's famous graph and is also seen on a map of the Battle of Berezina that occurred later.
— 108.185.100.231 (talk) 01:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: The previous coordinates for this article, given at , correspond to a "Smolyany", in the Brest region. This is implausibly far beyond the area of operations of the units involved at the time. Consider the following facts that can be used to bound the locations of the forces involved:
* In the preceding Battle of Czasniki, the Russians under Wittgenstein defeated the French under Victor, after which the French forces retreated to Senno.
* Since this Battle of Smoliani was "the last effort of the French to reestablish their northern flank", it would have taken place in the same vicinity as the above.
* Wittgenstein's forces were threatening the path of retreat of the Grande Armée (which was trying to reach Minsk from Smolensk via Krasny, Orsha and Borisov).
* Subsequently, at the Battle of Berezina, Victor's forces served as the rearguard of the Grande Armée, holding off Wittgenstein's forces that were arriving from the northeast.
Thus, the location "Smoliani" referred to here is most likely Smolany, in the Vitebsk region (also Smaĺjany or Smolyany) at . While this remains an approximate location, it satisfies the bounds described above, and is therefore consistent with (and supported by) well-sourced facts established within this and related articles.
— 108.185.100.231 (talk) 01:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, and since the coordinates in the article have already been changed, there's nothing more to do here. Deor (talk) 11:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate change
Talk:Hundertwasser koru flag

message: Koru flag redirects here (to Hundertwasser koru flag). Why is there an article entirely dedicated to one type of koru flag? Were there plans to write a separate article at koru flag? Wouldn't it make sense to move this article back to Koru flag and have a section for Hundertwasser koru flag? (I realise I'm a few weeks away from the previous move.) +mt 20:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the rationale above, you will find the answer to your question. Schwede66 21:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  So you plan to write a new article for Koru flag to discuss the others separately? If no, then I suggest to move it back. Ultimately, I think this article should be similar to Silver fern flag, which describes a variety of flags with a silver fern. +mt 22:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are not happy with the result of the move request, the appropriate action is to start another formal move request, and this page tells you how to go about it. Schwede66 23:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was this moved? 
Talk:Running Springs, California

message: I removed some POV language and plug for a non-notable business in the area, rewrote the bit about the CEDU schools, added half a sentence regarding the controversy over said schools and sourced that info from the SB Sun. While researching that, I also found several (about a dozen) articles in The (Spokane, WA) Spokesman-Review about lawsuits against another CEDU/Brown Schools school up in Idaho alleging similar abuse, but I didn't include them here as they're not wholly relevant to the schools in Running Springs. If/when an article on that school system is created, go into Newsbank (if you have access through a university or such) and search The Spokesman-Review for "CEDU"--or leave me a note on my talk page and I'll go do it. cluth 22:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CEDU 

message: Having lived in Lake Arrowhead for 12 years, I have never heard one person use the term "Hilltoppers." Flatlanders is definately a common phrase however. Personally I think that using the term flatlanders makes us seem kind of primitive, like cavemen or something. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.205.120.223 (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hilltoppers
Talk:Russian River (California)

message: a stub.  it needs expansion especially in hydrology, ecology, history, prehistory and management. need more sourcing and images. Anlace 03:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial assessment

message: I made a slight change about the river flowing through Lake Mendo.  Technically only the East Fork feeds  the lake.  The West Fork bypasses it entirely, and is the one that most people notice along 101 north of Ukiah. 80Lock 00:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content

message: This river is a major watercourse in Northern California. However, the Klamath, Eel, Trinity, Smith (and probably the Mad and Van Duzen) are ALL larger rivers. Norcalal (talk) 08:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th largest?
Talk:Rustic Canyon, Los Angeles

message: The vast majority (if not the entirty of) the section "Murphy Ranch" is directly lifted from the LA Times article here.  Is anyone willing to properly source it/rewrite it? Montecarlocars (talk) 08:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murphy Ranch 

message: This article conflates Santa Monica Canyon and Rustic Canyon, which are distinct both as neighborhoods and actual canyons. Both of the canyons are completely within the city limits of Los Angeles; Santa Monica (the city) stops at the southern rim of Santa Monica canyon.
This article should be moved to Santa Monica Canyon and a separate article should be spun-off for Rustic Canyon.
As for zip codes, the exact opposite of what the article states is true: both of these canyons lie within 90402 and have Santa Monica addresses. This is, in fact, one of their defining features: they are the only place within the city limits of LA with SM addresses.Armandtanzarian 03:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Monica Canyon 

message: I removed a large block of information here because it was added by a source with a WP:Conflict of interest and did not have any WP:Reliable WP:Secondary sources. If you disagree, just tell why below and we can all talk about ways of restoring this information. Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Hillside development
Talk:Soldier of Fortune, Inc.

message: The controversies section is unsourced and some of the claims seem a bit dumb. For example it's claimed Delvecchio wouldn't be good under cover because of his behaviour when not undercover which is somewhat dumb. Perhaps his behaviour when not under cover is like that because it's the only time he can be like that. Ultimately the whole section looks a bit to me like it was written by one or two fans as is common with these sort of things and as such has a lot of flawed claims Nil Einne (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 

message: Any specific reasons why the extensive use of split-screen sequences is not mentioned? After all the depiction of 2-4 plot-related events which occurred at the same time was a kind of trademark for the show. --Lennier1 (talk) 22:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split-Screen not mentioned
Talk:S Shuttle

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Yellow Line (Muni Metro) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Yellow Line (Muni Metro) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 14:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yellow Line (Muni Metro)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Yellow Line (San Francisco) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Yellow Line (San Francisco) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 14:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yellow Line (San Francisco)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Muni Metro Yellow Line and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Muni Metro Yellow Line until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 14:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Muni Metro Yellow Line" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Yellow Line (San Francisco Muni Metro) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Yellow Line (San Francisco Muni Metro) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 14:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yellow Line (San Francisco Muni Metro)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Yellow Line (San Francisco Shuttle) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Yellow Line (San Francisco Shuttle) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 14:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yellow Line (San Francisco Shuttle)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sac-Joaquin Section

message: I propose that Sac-Joaquin Section be merged into CIF Sac-Joaquin Section.  The new article CIF Sac-Joaquin Section follows the naming convention of the other 9 sections of the  California Interscholastic Federation, some of which were created by another user in the last 2 days, some that have been long established.  The content of this long lasting article is slightly better though I see it followed the same path of naming each school per the source here.  I started what looks like a better format of creating an article for each league (called a conference), rather than trying to name each school within this many different conferences.  It would be nice if someone closer to the area might up the ball and link the correct schools, but then I'm suggesting someone else do work on wikipedia, which usually never happens so I'll get to all this work slowly. Trackinfo (talk) 04:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Sacramento City Unified School District

message: * http://www.scusd.edu/Multilingual/Documents/Spanish/AbsenceNote,Spanish.pdf uses "Distrito Escolar Unificado de Sacramento"
WhisperToMe (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Spanish names

message: This article Sacramento Coalition to Save Public Education is an orphan - can we not merge that this article into here? Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sacramento Coalition to Save Public Education

message: Here are multilingual documents:
* Spanish: http://www.scusd.edu/sites/main/files/file-attachments/parentrightsstandardsofbehavior2013-14spanish8-14-13.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6SOkcfRkC
* Chinese: http://www.scusd.edu/sites/main/files/file-attachments/parentrightsstandardsofbehavior2013-14chinese8-14-13.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6SOkmnsid
* Hmong: http://www.scusd.edu/sites/main/files/file-attachments/parentrightsstandardsofbehavior2013-14hmong8-14-13.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6SOkjVaf0
* Russian: http://www.scusd.edu/sites/main/files/file-attachments/parentrightsstandardsofbehavior2013-14russian8-14-13.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6SOkf4Z26
* Vietnamese: http://www.scusd.edu/sites/main/files/file-attachments/parentrightsstandardsofbehavior2013-14vietnamese8-14-13.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6SOksFkY8
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign languages
Talk:Sacramento Gold Miners

message: I'm going to be editing/correcting information found on the pages of the various CFL teams that played in the USA.  All data I'm using comes from the CFLdb Statistics website, at https://stats.cfldb.ca.   The only changes I'm making to the 1994 Sacramento article are 2 attendance figures, 2 scores, and the dates for the pre-season games.  Elsquared (talk) 00:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  correcting information
Talk:Sacramento High School

message: Gosh, it seems that this page only offers information of notable people; almost like it's advertising this school for how good it is. Should we consider this page for deletion? Otherwise, it could be improved a lot... --Danny sepley 14:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has a decent intro. The lists probably could be prosified and cut back. --Lendorien (talk) 15:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: As a threshold for notability a simple standard is having a WP article.  RJFJR (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Mustansiriya University

message: Al-Mustansiriya School is the one established in the 13th century. Al-Mustansiriya university is an iraqi university newer than the Uni of Baghdad, and although they share the same name, they are not related. please correct that. --Lord Anubis 22:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you Lord,There should be a seperate article for each one--Aziz1005 20:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sacramento Theatre Company

message: This page is deperately in need of a complete re-write and a more neutral tone. It comes across like a pamplet for the theatre. --Amadscientist 09:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify Please 

message: This article twice referes to the Eaglet Theatre. What? Are you perhaps refereing to the Eagle Theater?--Amadscientist 09:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eaglet or Eagle theatre? 

message: The Eagle was a Gold Rush era theater built mostly of canvas. The Old Eagle Theatre in Old Sacramento was intended as a reconstruction of the original Eagle. The Sacramento Civic Rep, under the leadership of Eleanor McClatchy, named its Eaglet Theatre in tribute to the original Eagle. The Sacramento Theater Company mainstage descends from the Eaglet, not the Eagle. Conigliarodundee 15:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. I was not sure if that was a typo and could not find verification!--Amadscientist 09:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eaglet Distinct from Eagle

message: Almost the entirety of the article is copy and pasted from the official website, as seen here.  The article is outside my usual wheelhouse and I only stumbled onto the problem by following a problem IP editor (which is kind of funny actually since I've worked at STC before).  SO I leave it to regular watchers to fix.  Millahnna (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Paste, Advert tone 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: link to source. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  BobbyeJo11 (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:MSN Mobile

message: I have marked this article with the advert tag; it would much benefit from a rewrite, since it is written mostly in advert form and not necessarily informative or NPOV.
Skyld 11:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello to those that come across this page, I wish to invite everyone to help me with these planned improvements, I hope to write about Microsoft's suite of M.S.N. services available for various devices, here are the applications as listed:
:M.S.N. News
:M.S.N. Weather
:M.S.N. Money
:M.S.N. Sports
:M.S.N. Travel
:M.S.N. Food & Drink
:M.S.N. Health & Fitness
These applications will slowly and gradually be implemented into this article and they and their histories (which includes their ventures under Bing Mobile will be listed here) at present I must gather more sources to make this page more reliable, until every one of these are listed I shall keep this page as "outdated". Sincerely, --Namlong618 (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned improvements 

message: Hello everyone,  I want to suggest a merger with the regular MSN page, both content should largely overlap as Microsoft has merged the traditional M.S.N. Windows 8's M.S.N. and the Bing suite of applications into one M.S.N. portal, what's written here counts for the M.S.N. page, the only difference is that most M.S.N. branded applications (Applications 1 to 7) only go back to 2012 while the M.S.N. article goes back to 1995 so there is a bit more information needed for a merger, but so far both pages are relatively compatible. Sincerely, --Namlong618 (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merger with the regular Microsoft Network page
Talk:Saddleback (Orange County, California)

message: Growing up within sight of this landmark, I've never seen or heard these called "Saddleback Mountains" anywhere but in this article. The common use is usually just "The Saddleback" or "Saddleback", as are the places named after it. GNIS lists "Old Saddleback" and "Saddleback Mountain" as some historic names for Santiago Peak alone.
Unless someone objects or can cite a source for the current name, I'll move this article to Saddleback (Orange County, California). --Justin (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, and all inbound links updated. --Justin (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename article

message: Couldn't they find a better photo for Saddleback!?
2603:8001:3846:2D00:582E:AB4E:C0C:B523 (talk) 00:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible photo!
Talk:Benjamin Pogrund

message: This is said to be in two different years in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.150.234.8 (talk) 07:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 