lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Count Baltar

message: Count? Never in the original series is Baltar referred to as Count. People have erroneously mixed him up with another character, Count Iblis. This page should be renamed to simply "Baltar", and all instances of "Count Baltar" on this and all related pages should be changed to "Baltar".
:Not necessarily, although not mentioned onscreen, the novelisations of the original episodes refer to him as Count Baltar, though it is hinted in the novelisation of the pilot that he basically 'bought' his title due to his wealth. Douglasnicol 18:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Novelizations aren't canon. Move the fricking page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.195.134 (talk) 03:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: First off...who says they're not canon, secondly, courtesy costs nothing. Douglasnicol (talk) 20:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Susan Clancy

message: Living people without much relevance in the academic field should not have a Wikipedia article,
otherwise the quality of the encyclopedia will be going downhill.
Stop flooding it with useless wannabes!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linda Martens (talk • contribs) 04:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Person unworthy of Wikipedia article 

message: Hi, I'm going to start a rewrite on this page. There are several dead links but there is a lot more reputable and notable information on her available now. Literalkoala (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Tonbridge and Malling

message: ==Tiers of local government==
The article muddles the two tiers of local government:
*the members of the District Council, the second tier (central government being the first), who often serve an area made up of more than one village, or alternatively serve only part of a larger town such as Snodland, where there are two councillors for two wards; and
* the civil parish, the third tier, where there are also members on a different council, serving an area often larger than a village itself
As a result, this article is at odds with that on the List of civil parishes in Kent. It is a common misapprehension, I'm afraid! Most village articles omit to include the words civil parish, and confine themselves to talking about the village itself, ignoring the other settlements included in the parish. Peter Shearan 07:37, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mini-nuke

message: citations?? quotes??
Jabbi 07:41, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: more info here - Nuclear bunker buster - but feel free to add more info and reword more precisely. Boud 16:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plans to produce mini-nukes have been publicly declared by the USA.

message: This article appears to be 100% wrong and might be a candidate for deletion or redirect to one of the following articles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_bunker_buster
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon
 --BillyTFried 03:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article seems to be completely incorrect.
Talk:Blinding (medicine)

message: *Suggest merging this topic into double-blind.  I know there is some valuble additional information here, and I would preserve it.  However, blinding is really not just about medicine, its part of all scientific method and is especially important in the social sciences, psychology, and even the physical sciences.  I had considered creating a topic Blinding (scientific method) and merging both into it, but Double-blind is already a pretty good category and its a term most people would use when searching for information. Thatcher131 07:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Small interfering RNA

message: shRNA are different from siRNA - sh stands for Short Hairpin, not just plain Short.
shRNA are synthesized as a single-stranded palindromial RNA fragments, short enough to constitute as an artificial siRNA.
:There was a confusion between de two concepts. I've changed some sh by si. Llull 16:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: that intend to enhance understanding the concepts of this article
* How does siRNA relate to Viroids? --Tomaschwutz (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: siRNA Peer Review 1[edit]
Ali F[edit]
The introduction to the article needs to be cleaned up. It’s not terribly inaccessible, but I would focus on making it simpler for the average individual. Furthermore, the sources listed are mainly primary sources: while this is good for establishing ethos, it limits the accessibility of the article further. This is further inhibited by the lack of new figures: the figures that are already in Wikipedia are OK, but you need more. In particular, a GIF or other animation of the process would be helpful. Overall, the content seems to be OK, but the presentation could be improved. The information presented is good, but presentation is important and can stand to be improved. -AMF2718 (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review and Responses during the educational assignment in Fall 2016 

message: Never used for HIV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8453:6D00:618E:99C7:F7FE:C82F (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: siRNA

message: — Assignment last updated by Prabal09 (talk) 01:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics
Talk:Regret

message: (Im not english)ThanksDzoni 14:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remorse suggests regret, but that you will also do something about it/wouldn't do it again. --86.139.116.130 22:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's hard to describe because it is really very easy to confuse, but also not quite the same. You could start by explaining that you might regret that last glass of beer you had, but you wouldn't feel remorse for it, because regret is often just caused by undesirable results (like the hangover it got you). Remorse is more closely associated with personal guilt than regret is, it is more moral and emotional in nature. You will probably also regret having started to smoke (especially once you get lung cancer) but you would feel remorse for smoking during pregnancy and having it result in a mentally or physically disabled child. That's moral AND emotional: You are emotionally affected because it is your child suffering and morally because it is also your fault. Do you understand it better now? --TheOtherStephan 22:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whats the difference beetwen Remorse and Regret

message: What about the feeling one gets when wishing one had taken an opportunity to do something in the past, but would now be too late and/or impractical to do so? Could that also be considered as 'regret'? The article dosen't address this. --Seven of Nine 15:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regret by inaction 

message: Parts of his article are written in first person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.117.141.94 (talk) 05:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written in the first person point of view 

message: Remorse is an emotion. It cannot be an exclusively intellectual activity (as in 'intelligent OR emotional'). It is an emotional activity. The intellect is merely influenced (in terms of generated thoughts) by the emotions. - Nearfar (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'intelligent dislike'? 

message: regret / [rɪˈɡret]
noun
	
A spontaneous emotional response to getting caught.
	
Source --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Newer York dictionary entry for Regret 

message: wiktionary: Emotional pain on account of something done or experienced in the past (emphasis mine)
this article: reaction to personal past acts and behaviors
So can you regret something that happened to you, as opposed to something you did or failed to do?
If regret is limited to personal acts: can you regret something you did if it wasn't a deliberate choice? --176.2.108.202 (talk) 14:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  doesn't match wiktionary definition 

message: Apologies for the opportunities I missed 2A03:2880:31FF:1E:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologising for the opportunities I missed
Talk:University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science

message: These are all stub articles representing departments within the Faculty of Science.  With the possible exception of the computer science department, none of the other pages has enough unique content to justify a separate existence.  Even if content were added, that would not improve the problem because these articles would still seem to violate WP:NOT a website for the University of Copenhagen's science department. Thatcher131 08:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. I think a reasearch center within a university can be notable enough to have its own article. I like the current format of many articles. Thue | talk 21:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

text: At least the Niels Bohr institute is extremely notable in its own right. Thue | talk 21:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

message: This edit  adds more dates, but they are not chronological (in sequence).  Plus, it is written as sentences and not a flowing paragraph.  Can someone improve, perhaps user:Athanasios.syrakis?Lucas559 (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Clumsy
Talk:Spice agony

message: Obviously.  Why wait, totally non-controversial. Thatcher131 08:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Spice agony probably best refers to the trial of Leto II and the birth of Leto and Ghanima.  The other uses are tangential at best.  More rewriting? Thatcher131 03:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is written "in-universe" and referenced entirely to the novels.  Is there any evidence of independent interest in this topic?  Groomtech (talk) 11:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is somewhat redundant of some content in other articles and is a bit in-universe on its own; I've been meaning to merge it, and will do so in the near future. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 05:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Swing vote

message: Yes. Seems non-controversial Thatcher131 08:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No controversy

message: This article needs a general once-over for redundancy. Tag applied after merge. Ste4k 07:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: Removed global tag and cleanup tag. Most of the USA references have been either removed or adjusted, and there are references to other countries political systems. Gave the requested once-over from above. Other than citiations the article appears to be in ok shape. --Infero Veritas (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag Change 

message: I don't see how the issue of 3rd parties is directly related to swing voters. Even 3rd parties have voters who always vote for their candidate. Some swing voters never vote for a 3rd party, because they feel they're wasting their vote (except in those rare cases where polls give a 3rd party candidate a real chance). There are many other possibilities that are beyond the scope of this entry.Bostoner (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Parties 

message: I don't know how to reword this, but it doesn't clearly distinguish between a swing voter and an undecided voter. According to the Washington Post Glossary official published election results], a swing voter is a "voter who is not extremely loyal to a particular party and may cross party lines to select a candidate." This is different from an undecided voter, who has not decided how to vote at any given time during the election season. I'm not sure if I agree with their definition. I would substitute "extremely" with "very", since under some circumstances, almost every voter could cross party lines. Bostoner (talk) 01:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:1 E4 K

message: 11,604.5 K (11,331.35 °C): temperature where the average kinetic energy of a molecule is 1 eV
Is this accurate?  It seems incorrect to me.  The Boltzmann constant article says that:
:k = 1.380 6505(24) × 10−23 joules/kelvin 
This, indeed, would correspond to a temperature of (1 eV / k) = (1.602e-19 / 1.381e-23) =  11600 K.
However, this doesn't take into account the heat capacity of the material.  Different molecules will have different energies at the same temperature.  For a monatomic, with three degrees of freedom, the energy is E = 1.5kT per atom.  Bigger particles carry yet more kinetic energy per unit temperature.  Thus, the above temperature is very misleading.  It is being removed... and replaced with the relevant temperature 7736K (temperature at which a monatomic ideal gas has a kinetic energy of 1 eV... equals 11604 K/1.5).
--Obsidian-fox 08:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscalculated Temp?
Talk:The Last of the Mohicans (1992 film)

message: I had never heard of the Yoga Awards. But would it be appropriate to provide a short statement about the reason it awarded Michael Mann the Worst Director Award? Was this about the violence portrayed? I do not know. This points to the lack of criticism this Wiki article provides about the movie. Leedurhamstone (talk) 07:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anybody care about the musings of some Catalan critics? What is their expertise in assessing "foreign" i.e. non-Catalonia movies? I would be inclined to remove that award from the article. 14.2.198.12 (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Now actioned. 182.239.159.8 (talk) 10:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoga Awards
Talk:AK Steel Holding

message: I am meging this with AK Steel Holding Corporation. Will delete afterwards Bangers 08:57, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  section 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested.  ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  14:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: AK Steel Holding →  – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:NCCORP Cardboxx (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 July 2023
Talk:Dakor

message: Hotel Millennium is a newly made modern Hotel in Dakor which has facilities like Restaurant ,Rooms AC & NON AC , Banquet hall , a garden and very nice parking place. Its on the main highway coming from Umreth to the nearby city  Dakor.
Our website : www.millenniumdakor.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviraj Rajendrasinh Solanki (talk • contribs) 17:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel Millennium
Talk:Coalition for Peace through Security

message: The article says that the CPS attracted criticism for alleging that "as well as the Communist Party of Great Britain, the World Peace Council and other organisations involved with the anti-nuclear movement were funded by the Soviet Union."  Did Bruce Kent (the source for this statement) really criticize the CPS for this?  It was never a secret that the CPGB and the WPC were funded by the Soviet Union, so these are hardly allegations.  Marshall46 (talk) 10:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Allegations" 
Talk:Bruce Kent

message: Needs resolving:
"In 1987, Kent left the priesthood ... ."
"In 1992 Kent was a candidate for the Labour Party in the constituency of Oxford West and Abingdon, where he came third. Had he been elected, he would at the time have been prevented, as an ordained priest, from taking his seat in the House of Commons." 
Marshall46 (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention that fact that he married in 1988... —Muzilon (talk) 06:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The text now says "" I'm not sure there's any contradiction. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Would an interview with transcript with Bruce Kent from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_D6186A06D99F4F4F8FDFEF367B48E6D7 (I have a conflict of interest; otherwise I would add it myself.) Mccallucc (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link?
Talk:Roll Bounce

message: Shouldn't the fact that the title is taken from the title of a funk song noteworthy?  Klptyzm 03:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to a Funk Song (Title) 
Talk:Soli Sorabjee

message: Do you think that mentioning the religion of a person on his page is important?
Anirudh 1523 hrs 11/2/2006 IST
*is he a Parsi? 198.62.10.11 (talk) 13:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aeroplane (Red Hot Chili Peppers song)

message: Aeroplane (Song) → Aeroplane (song) – Proper caps -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 14:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add any additional comments
I went ahead and moved this because I seriously doubt that anyone would contest it. Nohat 01:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Should be something about the (semi-surreal) content of the video... AnonMoos (talk) 08:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video
Talk:Parallel Universe (song)

message: Parallel Universe was never released as a single.
*Any evidence?—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 17:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Single

message: Does this song talk about drug use or mental illness? "Psychic changes are born in your heart.." and so on...?--213.140.22.64 06:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Meaning
Talk:FIS Alpine World Ski Championships

message: The lists should be resorted to use gold medals as the first sort order, then silver, then bronze.
Someone with 10 silver and 10 bronze medals should be listed lower than someone with 1 gold (and four bronze, say, to pass the 5 medals total limit). 85.227.226.160 21:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  list sort order 

message: In the last two championships they have had team events too. How should we handle this in the medal lists? Should we lists those aswell? 213.114.184.85 17:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Events 

message: FYI. The finalists for the 2013 alpine ski championships are in the FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2013 article if you wish to look and create a new article. Chris 20:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 championships 

message: Are there skiers who medaled in all 5 disciplines? 213.149.62.160 (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple medalists 

message: As title. Points, qualification, etc. Nothing for any newbie to understand how this all works. Disgracefiul 2A0E:425:7DE5:0:A4BD:9674:CF9F:EC14 (talk) 10:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention on how this all works.
Talk:Charles Webster Leadbeater

message: Could someone who knows how to create links, link the name of Mary Lutyens in the "Australia..." section to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Lutyens ? 173.17.176.73 (talk) 04:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Great catch! FULBERT (talk) 14:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary Lutyens
Talk:Quasifield

message: There seems to be some confusion.  Most sources omit the right distributive law (a+b).c=a.c+b.c
However some sources omit the other one.
Is there a general consensus, or should I make two definitions?
:Just mention there is a choice. I think 'loop' in your sense is probably loop (algebra), which goes to quasigroup. Charles Matthews 19:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I deleted the following paragraph, because I think it detracts somewhat from the main points:
"If it is not a division ring, the plane is never desarguesian.  However, as the order of a quasifield is always a prime power, one cannot expect to find counterexamples for the conjecture that the order of a projective plane is always a prime power."
The fact that a plane is desarguesian iff its associated planary ternary ring is a division ring is better discussed in projective plane; if someone wants to emphasize it, it would make more sense to do so in planar ternary ring than here. And I'm not sure what the "However" is supposed to entail in the next sentence. Also, I agree that the prime power order problem is somewhat underplayed in projective plane (it is buried in the Properties section), but I'm not sure if it really has the status of a conjecture. All that being said, if someone is really attached to the paragraph, feel free to restore it, but please consider rewording it. --Michael Kinyon 17:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted paragraph
Talk:Relativity priority dispute

message: The German von Soldner might be mentioned. I don't know if Einstein ever mentioned Soldner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c4:4e9f:d101:1005:fd7:447c:871e (talk • contribs) 11:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  von Soldner 

message: It seems to me that this article omits or badly neglects a couple of important contextual factors: the human relationships (or lack thereof) between the individuals involved, and their opinions on the topic. Perhaps they were all good friends, and none of them cared about the topic of this article. Perhaps they were bitter rivals making jealous accusations, and they would be jumping in to correct the record. Perhaps no personal relationships existed between them. Whatever the case may be, I think this stuff ought to be a main point, if not THE main point, of the article, taking up a large chunk of the lead section; otherwise it's difficult to determine why anyone would be interested in it. (The science remains the same regardless of who gets credit, so figuring out "who was the first to say what" seems pointlessly trivial without the human element.) In short: Please very prominently explain who has an interest in getting this issue cleared up, because currently the answer appears to be "nobody, it's not worth reading". TooManyFingers (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Relativity is considered one of the great advances of science, and the story is often told to make various points. There is a lot of interest in getting the story right. Roger (talk) 04:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I recognize the importance of the advance. I'm arguing that until the context I described is provided, the story you refer to will remain very far from being right. When an out-of-order sequence of meaningless events is finally put into the correct order, the result is still meaningless. The discoveries and statements about relativity are meaningful in themselves of course, but telling the story of how they came about has very little to do with merely putting them into chronological order, and much more to do with the personal/professional/social/political interactions that led to them or influenced them. Those interactions (or independent actions, as the case may be) ARE the story; getting the sequence right is a relatively minor editing chore, not a final goal. TooManyFingers (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

text:  In other words: The story is the explanation of WHY the events happened the way they did. If you focus only on WHEN they happened, the result is a bus timetable, not a story. TooManyFingers (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context?