lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:University Carlo Cattaneo

message: Surely the "University Carlo Cattaneo" really ought to be re-named the "Carlo Cattaneo University"? Safebreaker (talk) 13:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of university (and article)
Talk:Vigroids

message: Can anyone who has tasted both Nigroids and Sen Sen confirm that they are the same or similar? Shalom S. 15:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're similar in that they both taste strongly of liquorice. As I recall, SenSen were more "medicinal" (non-liquorice elements, a bit more like a cough drop) while Nigroids are mostly liquorice extract with a hint of menthol. I loved them both. sNkrSnee | t.p. 03:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Added comment to this article similar to comment added to Sen Sen article about the similarities between the two products. Jmdeur (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sen Sen
Talk:RVCA

message: What's the template to throw a non-neutral point of view on an article? This one needs it. --71.139.181.16 (talk) 06:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article still needs major cleanup if it is going to stay... which it probably shouldn't... I mean, 99% of the sponsored athletes it mentions try to link to their page, but they don't even have a page for themselves... Skiendog (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: This was certainly written by an RCVA publicist. I feel like this should probably just be taken down since it is such an endorsing page. I came to this page to figure out what the heck RVCA stood for.
: I second with deletion.  It seems like a non-notable small clothing line that no one has ever heard of before. Skiendog (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete Page 

message: Three references from reliable sources state that Conan Hayes was a co-founder of RVCA.  One or more editors have been removing this information without any reliable source to the contrary.  I am bring this topic to the talk page so they can discuss why this sourced content should not be included. 72Dino (talk) 03:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder 

message: Seems to be a huge lack of citations.  Skiendog (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:USS Paulding

message: On the page, the photo caption identifies this as the port (left) side of USS Paulding, which it clearly is.
When one enlarges the photo, however, the caption misidentifies the subject as the starboard (right) side of said vessel, which it clearly is not.  Alice has clearly passed thru the looking glass.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 02:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You could contact the National Archives and complain to them instead of wikipedia where it is apparently correct. They captioned it from wherever they received it. ( https://catalog.archives.gov/id/530782 ) Also, slides or negatives sometimes get scanned or viewed backwards so it could have been a mirror image that the person who wrote the original caption was looking at. --Dual Freq (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption Hilarity
Talk:M&T Bank

message: This should be edited in some fashion to Highmark Stadium and properly linked. 136.34.234.136 (talk) 09:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref. to "Bills Stadium" in the intro paragraph(s) is outdated 

message: Michael leahi 135.19.146.189 (talk) 03:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customer analyst manager
Talk:Mitsuhirato

message: Since the first part of this name resembles the Japanese-origin word for three, shouldn't that be rendered as 三津? What source confirmed that the Japanese version of the name as written the way it is in the main article? Peace. —MuzikJunky (talk) 05:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Does the kanji come from a Japanese-language version of ''The Blue Lotus''?
Talk:Ra-Ra Zoo

message: in the Edit History but I am not Dave. Mike Spathaky (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: I show as Spathaky
Talk:Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Manila

message: Sure po ba na ang deadline of payment sa pup taguig ay noong February 23,2009?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.202.153.9 (talk) 08:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  deadline 

message: The link www.pupcomm.tk appears to be broken and is removed from the page
D (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pupcomm.tk link?
Talk:List of Rescue Me episodes

message: Any news/info about it? Yoosq 21:02, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Phobia" 

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: hi
I'd like to know if rescue me is being shown on any tv station in the uk at present and if so where and what series. I really enjoyed this series when it was broadcast on sky one but since they dropped it after series 3 i cant find it anywhere?
Please help if you have any knowledge.
Jonathan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.44.138 (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is rescue me being shown on any tv station in the uk at present? 

message: I've taken the liberty of changing the title of Episode 1 from Season 6 from "Life" to "Legacy", not just because MSN TV is a reliable source and cites it as such, but because the source for "Life", DaemonsTV, seems to be basing it's assertion of the title on a Hulu clip for Season 6, titled "Life", which is included in the article.  If you go to that video on Hulu, you'll notice that all of the clips have a title, asserting that the promo is titled "Life", not the episode.  Probably where TV.com, the other source cited, got it from (which, as we all know, is NOT a reliable source).  Also note that no summary is given for the episode on Hulu, which the editor cites as the source of their summary, so that was also changed.  KnownAlias  contact 18:26, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change; "Life"-->"Legacy"
Talk:Lindex

message: The 28 countries with Lindex stores are all the EU countries plus the UK and Norway. Mdrb55 (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The UK left the EU at the end of January ...
Talk:Hachette Books

message: The protagonists' airship in The Island at the Top of the World was christened Hyperion, probably after the Greek Titan. knoodelhed 07:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Probable source of the name
Talk:Party of Progress and Socialism

message: Wasn't it formerly a communist surrogate organization for the disbanded Communist Party of Morocco?--Miacek (t) 13:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist? 
Talk:USS Essex (1874)

message: I notice the article is in (and links to) Template:Adams class gunboat, but the text opens by stating "USS Essex was an Enterprise-class wooden-hulled armed naval steam sloop of war". Does anyone know which is the correct name for the class? Dunarc (talk) 22:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would note that I have started a related relevant discussion at Template talk:Adams class gunboat where I have also noted that theUSS Nipsic's article says "in 1874 she was rebuilt as a new, and substantially larger, Adams/Enterprise-class gunboat" further muddying the issue of the name of the class. Dunarc (talk) 22:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class
Talk:GNU Readline

message: How can it be a point of criticism against Readline that software wanting to link against it does not abide by the terms it has been freely licensed by? That's akin to criticizing someone for not giving their belongings away for free. At best, you could call it a disadvantage to someone.--217.157.165.109 (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then change the section title to something more neutral. The licensing terms of readline have been discussed again and again in many contexts. For example, somewhat famously, CLISP was not distributed under the GPL until Stallman convinced CLISP-developer Bruno Haible that their use of readline with CLISP constituted a violation of the GPL. Similar discussions can be found on many mailing lists, e.g. concerning Firebird, Lua, ncftp, or PostgreSQL. Stallman himself mentions readline as an example in his essay "Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library". I guess what I am trying to say is that the controversies about readline's license are notable and should at least be mentioned in the article. — Tobias Bergemann (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see that you have reworked and significantly expanded the section about which we were talking. Thank you! — Tobias Bergemann (talk) 07:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Criticism" 

message: In Debian psql is compliled against libedit and uses libreadline at runtime due to license issues with OpenSSL
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607907
http://blog.endpoint.com/2011/08/debian-postgres-readline-psql-problem.html
Compukid (talk) 13:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  readline/openssl license issue  

message: While readline is a library, its notability stems from its history and widespread usage. The API itself is nothing special and may not belong on-topic. While there is a precedent of code on Wikipedia, this is a large program compared to the size of the article. What is it really adding? Arzg (talk) 23:57, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is too much ripping out, done without anywhere near enough discussion.  I'm restoring and asking that we get more than 30 minutes discussion.  Msnicki (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the sample code on-topic? 

message: There is no semantic difference between the two, as both will loop continuously, but I thought it may be more understandable by less technical readers to change to a while loop.
Jflopezfernandez (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced empty for loop with while(1)
Talk:USS Guadalcanal (LPH-7)

message: There are photos of the aftermath of the crash here http://www.flickr.com/photos/35033278@N00/6811466356/in/photostream and http://www.flickr.com/photos/35033278@N00/6957578449/in/photostream and also some photos of the search in the same photostream. Is there any way to link them in the article? Talltim (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1976 helicopter crash 

message: I've reversed the edit for now because they were using the wrong template.  So I decided to look back where that 1975 PEB information comes from.  The diff is here  but I do not see a source.  So all I can assume that it is original research.  So I'll be removing this.  ViriiK (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  28 knots per hour.
Talk:Gangsta Gangsta (Lil Scrappy song)

message: I searched everywhere that archives Billboard charts and found nothing for this song.
*allmusic
*Billboard.biz search
*Billboard.com
Nowhere do I see this song. I had to remove the false data from everywhere linked to Scrappy and Lil Jon. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 06:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence of charting? notability?
Talk:USS Blue Ridge (AGC-2)

message: "During the initial landings, three air attacks came close enough to be a threat to Blue Ridge, but veered off the in the face of heavy anti-suicide swimmers and small fast suicide boats. To combat this threat, a patrol boat was kept circling Blue Ridge and all shipboard security patrols were strengthened."
Heavy anti-suicide swimmers?
I think there is something missing here; should it read something like:
"veered off the face of heavy anti-aircraft fire. However there was a danger of suicide swimmers {Fukuryu? or Kaiten?} and small fast suicide boats {Shinyo}. To combat this threat, a patrol boat was kept circling"
--dawkeye (talk) 02:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide weapons
Talk:USS Dorothea L. Dix

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --01:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: So proud of all who faught 2600:100C:B201:A240:2069:FC4A:5A73:EF3E (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My uncle was on this vessel in WW2
Talk:USS Douglas H. Fox

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --01:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Regarding this revert: “Royal Canadian Navy” was the name of the service until unification in 1968, so RCN I think is the appropriate name to use in describing events in 1967. Indefatigable (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I fixed my revert back to what you had done. You are correct. I got the date the ensign changed mixed up with the date it became MARCOM. Sorry bout that. Llammakey (talk) 21:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Canadian Navy 

message: Hello. Can anyone help me confirm the name of this ship, the USS Douglass H. Fox.
While researching a ship's bell clock I have found old 1940-1950's articles and photos referencing both the man and the ship with Douglass spelled with two 'S'.
Curious if this was a case of spell check gone bad. Just looking to make things right for the man and men that served on the ship.
Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.140.21.236 (talk) 14:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name incorrect - Should be USS Douglass H. Fox
Template talk:Celtic mythology topics

message: OK, as I proofread the "Ancient Celtic and Gaulish" section, there are some entries I'm not sure what to do with.  Does an obscure deity described as "British", with a cult center in England, really belong there? (Example: Arnemetia) We don't have a general Brythonic section... but I don't know that these sorts really belong in the Welsh section, either.  Do we do Gaelic and Brythonic, with sub-sections?  Argh! - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 00:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it does not fit, it does not fit. Let's remove any ambiguous entries. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Indeed... ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorizing

message: I knew that gigantic over-determined table would one day morph into a template. But there's just way too much going on here. We're working with three or four cultural groups (each in different regions and eras). Compare Roman mythology, which uses – for a single cultural group –
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
A similar breakdown allows you to have big themes of general interest at the top, specific themes at the bottom. I'd like to propose a similar solution here. I'm imagining (at a minimum) templates along these lines: , , , ... I'd prefer to break the Irish (i.e. Goidelic) material down further into cycles. What do you think? Q·L·1968 ☿ 20:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure... Go ahead. We will need then to check all articles that use the template and replace it with the more approriate one. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone want to suggest a name for the Mythological Cycle template (mostly Tuatha Dé Danann)? They're all "Celtic mythology (something)" so far, so my current idea is "Celtic mythology (TDD)". Any better ideas? Q·L·1968 ☿ 22:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Hearing no suggestions from others, I've finally convinced myself to use the tautological  for the sake of symmetry. Q·L·1968 ☿ 21:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Breaking it down

message: OK, while I appreciate the work that went into making the sections collapsible, what we have now is a template that is not accepting "collapsed" as a default. I'm going to try to fix the code but if I can't, I'm either reverting or removing it from articles. It's just too visually overwhelming if it can't be collapsed.  ARGH. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 02:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Big-Ass Template gets worse

message: Hi, could someone tell me what the intention behind adding Lugaid to the "Irish rulers and warriors" sub-template? Is it supposed to refer to a specific Lugaid, or all the kings with that name? Thanks, --JaGatalk 06:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, link to all it is. --JaGatalk 16:44, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lugaid 

message: I don't understand the thing about updating the documentation. I fixed a couple redirects on the template, but I really don't get whether or not, or how, to update the documentation. - CorbieV☊ 21:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help?
Talk:MF Tycho Brahe

message: As it stands right now, this page is subordinated to M, because of the backslash in the title. I'm going to remove it to fix this problem. Just posting here to let anyone who watches this page know why. Parsecboy (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for people that might be confused like I was: It was probably a slash ("/") that was removed (from "M/F"), and not a backslash ("\"). --Jhertel (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: Has this ferry not been fully electrified?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.192.37.51 (talk) 06:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fully electrified
Talk:Aquaphobia

message: "Fear of water" and "afraid of water"  should be redirected here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.35.0 (talk) 23:17, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection 

message: After reviewing the referenced document, I removed "the other" from the quote on how many Americans are afraid of deep water in pools and deep open water, as it's simply not present in the original work. (Also, 46% + 64% is over 100%, so definitely not true.) But this section could still use some work - the document referenced says that data came from another document, "Popke, M. (2009). Back to swim school. Athletic Business, 52-61.", which was very heavily referenced (9 references in the 7-page document). While anecdotal, I find it rather difficult to believe that half of Americans are afraid of swimming pools. Perhaps someone could double-check the true source material, or provide a better source for these statistics? 152.51.48.1 (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit: Found it: https://www.athleticbusiness.com/aquatics/adults-struggle-to-overcome-lifelong-fear-of-swimming.html  'The latest statistics, albeit from a decade-old Gallup Poll, indicate that 46 percent of American adults are afraid of deep water in pools, and 64 percent are afraid of deep open water. "I commissioned Gallup in 1998, because I knew that the number of people who were afraid was absolutely vast, but nobody would believe me," says Dash, who has been teaching adults to swim since 1983. "This way, everybody pays attention."'  So, these numbers come from a 22-year-old poll commissioned by a swimming institute founder, according to this article published in an athletics magazine. Is there more recent or less potentially biased data available? 152.51.48.1 (talk) 16:05, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data on Americans
Talk:Blowhole (anatomy)

message: Any information on the evolutionary aspects of the blowhole? Any other species has or had it? Enlil Ninlil 00:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know the evolution is well documented, so I'll look that up again some time and add it. BabyNuke 17:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: It doesn't "pass" the spine at all, actually. The trachea passes through the skull still in front of the brain to connect to the blowhole, which is located roughly on top of the head. BabyNuke 11:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Here you are: Pakicetus - Basilosaurus - Gray Whale  Fedor (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about some references for the artilce? Leading books that cover blowholes.  Careful readers will wonder what these are. --Firefly322 (talk) 02:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello, I added in a few sentences discussing more in depth as to how the air sacs work in whales when they dive underwater. I cited my addition with a journal article discussing this process. I thought it would be a good addition to that section to give the reader a little more knowledge as to how the muscles of the blowhole work. Lexiehiggins (talk) 02:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference?
Talk:USS Dale (1839)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I am doing an extensive rewrite of this article to take care of the issues listed and improve the quality of this article.  I am doing most of the work in my sandbox and will transfer in when it is ready.  I will post here when done.--Plmerry (talk) 06:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on Article
Talk:Freenet (ISP)

message: I remember using Freenet back in the good ol' days. --130.216.89.72 00:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss improvements of the article here. -- intgr #%@! 01:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be an idiot --130.216.89.72 02:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chat
Talk:USS Sacramento (AOE-1)

message: I often think about that ship, come here often to bad she had to be cut up. Had some good times on that ship SN(SW) Nibarger  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.219.27 (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Performance
Sacramento is considered a benchmark in West Coast shipbuilding. The ship and two of her sister ships, Seattle (AOE-3) and Detroit (AOE-4), are the largest ships ever built on the West Coast as of 2005. Only Iowa-class battleships and aircraft carriers have greater displacements than Sacramento."
I want to debate this point. For Full load displacement of Navy/Military ships I agree with the point. However from a building point of View light displacement is a better measure of size. Displacement reflects a ships weight if placed on scales. She is listed for 54,000 tons for full load displacement ( if fully loaded with cargo & fuel, etc). I have not idea of Sacramento's light displacement. I also wonder if where built- NASSCO in San Diego has built any thing bigger by light displacement. The newer AOE were built there, and they have a full load displacement 100 tons less.- unknown again for their light displacement. 74.214.54.170 (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "performance/ Size"
Talk:USS Alert (1861)

message: Replaced old blue infobox with light blue ship infobox, increased the abbreviated text  significantly based on information from DANFS. Added two introductory paragraphis, See Also, ref., cat, etc.' Increased number of internal links.
There is no illustration in DANFS for this vessel.Wikited (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:USS Advance (1862)

message: Replaced old infobox with new; added additional data from DANFS on the history of the ship; added new first paragraph showing the purpose of the ship; added links, references, see also, cats, etc. Wikified all. Wikited (talk) 01:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page 

message: "Needless to say, that unique shore bombardment proved to be a huge flash in the pan" - is this text from somewhere else? It doesn't seem very wikified. As well, that whole section about the bombardment takes place after the ship has been renamed to USS Frolic, but it's all written as though it was still named Advance, and only in the following section does it get referred to as Frolic. 203.217.150.69 (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I also discovered a stub at Advance (blockade runner). I've redirected it to here. However it did have a long reference list for a stub, so I've left it in the page (go to the redirect and hit edit to see) if anyone wants to see if there's new material that could be incorporated here. 203.217.150.69 (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style issues 

message: PD photos of ship's Civil War Confederate captain and engineer: archive.org. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource