lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pak Mok-wol

message: Did he die in 1978 or 1979?
:Everything I can find suggests 1978, specifically March 24. -- Visviva 03:29, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the obituary from The Dong-a Ilbo to the article; the date March 24 appears to have been correct. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 12:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of death 

message: The link to the Literature Translation Institute of Korea biographical datasheet  which was cited a few times in this article has been broken for a while; even the Internet Archive capture  doesn't work. I found what appears to be the updated URL  (not sure if the same content as the one which was originally cited), but it's evidently a WP:CIRCULAR citation (at the bottom of every language version it says "Source URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Mok-wol" (or es.wikipedia, ja.wikipedia, etc.). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  KLTI biographical datasheet
Talk:Etiology

message: There is a line that seems to have been added, removed and added again to the Mythology section that seems to be a bit of vandalism.
"Secular cults anthropomorphize chance through the Evolution myth, asserting that Chance can cause origins. Their myths of the origin of the universe and the origin of life as a function of a substantial quality, Chance, have been adopted by modern thought and are evidence of the persistence of the myth phenomena."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.142.144 (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: There's a discussion on the "homosexuality" page over the usage of "etiology" in the title of a section on biological causal factors.  Apparently that usage is insulting because it implies that homosexuality is a disease, but I've always though the term was used (as in the introduction to this page) as the study of how anything can come about, not just unfavorable things.  Any thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zickx009 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connotations? 

message: "Stained red from their forbidden love" is an interesting euphemism for "stained red from the fountain of gushing blood from their double suicide." Also, the berries start out white, not black. Actually, considering that there are two mistakes, I think I'll go ahead and change this myself. 
150.135.210.85 (talk) 06:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of phrasing for Pyramus and Thisbe 

message: Under the heading of 'Medicine', the paragraph begins "The following are examples of intrinsic factors:"
However, there seems to be no explanation of why we are being given examples only of intrinsic factors which might cause disesase, as opposed to examples of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Nor any explanation for the layman of what the words intrinsic and extrinsic mean in this context, nor of the fact that this is a common classification of causes of disease.
I could change this myself but I am not medically qualified, so if this is incorrect, perhaps someone would let me know. Otherwise I will come back here and add some further explanation.Buyani Nyoni (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medicine
Talk:Cru (Christian organization)/Archive 1

message: This article has passed the spam event horizon.  The idea of external links is to support the content of the article - links to one or two discussions in the media of the subject of the article are good, a list of links to every single chapter which has a Myspace page is definitely bad (Wikipedia is not a collection of links).  It would be good if someone could take a scythe to the list of links on this article. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  18:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Arbustoo has done a really great job with this! Lankiveil 07:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Spam 

message: Someone has added "Originator, distributor, and translator of JESUS, the most widely translated film in history (more than 900 languages)".  The 900 was originally 800.  I cannot find any citations or reference for these figures, so I can't argue about their accuracy, but it seems a bit optimistic for me.  Can someone help verify this? Lankiveil 13:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of those just look like dialects ("Standard Arabic" and "Standard Arabic with Egyptian Accent"?).  Perhaps the article should say "900+ languages and dialects"? Lankiveil 05:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics for "JESUS" translation
Talk:Sir Winston Churchill High School

message: At this point, I don't know if :Image:SWCHS.png is PD, I doubt it is, and doubt it can be used (although maybe under fair use).  See .  --rob 21:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is now listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images.  If may or may not be deleted as a result, depending on its legal status.  --Rob 20:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The image has been removed by me from this article, due to the copyright problem.  --Rob 06:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image may need to go. 

message: I am adding a POV tag to the article because I believe that some of the main contributors are connected to the school. This creates a non-neutral point of view that seems to unduly praise the school. Some examples include "outstanding," "prestigious," "crowned," "completely outplaying...," and "exceptional." This is excessive adulation and should be toned down. Piguy101 (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Wendell R. Anderson

message: It is a pretty silly looking picture, but the photo of Gov. Anderson on the cover of TIME should be included at some point. —Mulad (talk) 04:30, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
: The image was subsequently deleted 
:: 04:38, 26 November 2005 Sherool (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Wendell Anderson TIME.jpg" (WP:CSD#I5: "Orphaned fair use image". Uploaded under a "fair use" claim, but not currently used in any articles. Have been listed in Category:Orphaned fairuse images for at least 7 days.)
: Shinhan 10:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''TIME'' cover

message: He lost the election and was due to leave office in less than a week.  Yet he resigns?  Why? DavidRF (talk) 01:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but I suspect it was to give his successor a week additional seniority over others elected at the same time.--Appraiser (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He was DFL.  Boschwitz was IR.  Boschwitz beat him in the election.  Why would he help him out?  Plus, that seems like "cheating".  We'd hear about this happening much more often if that was why he did it.  What did the local papers say that week?  I'd like the clear this up because the Boschwitz article is very confusing... stating that he both beat Anderson in the election and was appointed to succeed him.  Its made doubly confusing because the other senate election that year (Durenberger) *was* a special election which  makes readers think there might be something special about the Boschwitz/Anderson election as well.  As far as I know, this was a standard Class 2 election. DavidRF (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Boschwitz did best him in the election, and then after Anderson resigned, Boschwitz was appointed by the Governor to the post to fill out the last week of the term. I'll try to find a reference for the reason Anderson resigned.--Appraiser (talk) 15:42, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did he resign?
Talk:Tom Riddle

message: "Before Voldemort graduated from Hogwarts, he returned to Little Hangleton, the village where he was born..." -- was he born in Little Hangleton? Was the orphanage there? --St. Chris 15:22, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace and orphanage

message: Back when we thought we were just going to have Tom Riddle as a redirect page to Lord Voldemort, I changed a ton of links throughout WP from Tom Riddle to Lord Voldemort to avoid the redirect. Now that it seems clear to have both pages we need to have people change them back. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 17:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Tom Riddle 

message: *There are two different schools of thought here. The Chamber of secrets was opened fifty years from 1993 at which time Tom Riddle was sixteen so minus 66 years and he was born on New Years Eve 1927. But according to the "official timeline" from some DVD Hagrid was expelled in 1942 so Voldemort being 16 in 1942 would have been born in 1926. I trust the books more so I'm in favor of going with 1927 as the birthdate, which would make both articles' given birthdays wrong. *shrugs*TonyJoe 14:36, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *I just changed both articles to 1927TonyJoe 14:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday

message: I have placed a soft redirect on this page. The material is all in Lord Voldemort, and as the pages were before, they both contain spoiler information about riddle being voldemort. This way, it is possible to give a workable spoiler warning for anyone that they are about to discover something. I would suggest linking to the Voldemort page when there is no secret to hide (which is the very large majority of links from other pages), and only explicitly linking to this page from other pages where the secret is being kept. Sandpiper 16:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft redirect
Talk:WVTM-TV

message: Article merged with duplicate WVTM, which is now a re-direct. - Hinto 04:48, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 22:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Template talk:Xiangqi-position

message: Yes!! The board works! Hurrah!
Fully functional. Now I will work on developing a partial board, ie. for examples where only a few squares are needed. I might possibly use Template:if.  
This template in, the invocation of parameters concept is inspired by Template:Chess position for pieces, and then for aligning the lines, Template:Game of Go Position. This template is the merger of both concepts, you might say. -- Natalinasmpf 17:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:David Davidar

message: This article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. For details, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/David Davidar. -- BD2412 talk 05:07, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
===Ref list?===
None of the references in the article are linked to any of the articles, nor do they have the titles of the articles mentioned. 120.56.191.71 (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD results

message: None of the references in the article are linked to any of the articles, nor do they have the titles of the articles mentioned. 120.56.191.71 (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref list?
Talk:Hasty pudding

message: :Why; there's not enough info for entire, full blown, subsections?
:WB2 06:47, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsections? 

message: "Polenta is the Italian version of hasty pudding... Mămăligă is the Romanian version, also made with corn."  Without citations, it's unclear whether the dishes are actually related.  Simply writing that one thing is a "version" of another thing without any clear connections comes across as elitist, particularly since the article on Mămăligă makes no reference to hasty pudding. NewkirkPlaza (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar dishes 

message: The article presently says that the term has been used in England since the 16th century at least, referencing the OED. I assume this is right (I'm not a subscriber).
Bearing in mind that the New England colonies only started in the 17th century, I do not see how it could have originated under this name in New England colonies. Thehalfone (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Protestantism in Afghanistan

message: "It’s strictly forbidden for a Muslim to convert to Christianity,"
:This statement is not entirely correct. Just as it's strictly forbidden for some Christians to work on Sunday but stating that "Christians are not allowed to work on weekends" is a fallacy, I would like the article to be cleaned up for a more neutral point-of-view examination of Christianity and Protestantism in Afghanistan. This is the reason for the NPOV tag. jglc | t | c 05:24, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I have never seen a reliable and impartial source indicating a number this high. Can anyone supply an adequate, reliable and impartial source? Scythian1 (talk) 01:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 10,000 Afghan Protestants/Christians?
Category talk:Nervous system

message: While Category:Neuroanatomy and Category:Neurophysiology are expected not to be overlapping, the Category:Neuroscience  certainly can overlap both of these though it is not quite discrete from Category:Nervous system under which each of these are already encompassed. I think that there needs to be an evaluation on how to redefine them. DiptanshuTalk 04:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping subcategories
Template talk:Infobox machinima

message: I've added a "crew" section. I'd be tempted to say that we could actually do with all the different movie roles as options - editor, cinematographer, motion graphics, sound, music, etc - but I'll leave that for now. 
- Hugh Hancock
:Sorry for the slow response, but I've added the following five fields for now: director, producer, editor, writer, and actor control. More can be added as needed. :) — TKD::Talk 07:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An addition
Talk:Dallas Green (musician)

message: How can I change the name of this page to City and Colour? I did try moving the page but it wouldn't allow me to do so.
--Seraphim Whipp 02:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page rename

message: How can this have any former members? It's mainly just Dallas and Nick. I've only heard of other people backing him at a few live shows, but they're not necessarily part of the project...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.5.200.68 (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former members? 

message: Why is the quote about how long Dallas Green has been writing material located under the band name section? I agree that it belongs on the article, but it has nothing to do with the name of the band. Youre dreaming eh? (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band name section 

message: maybe it is just me, but aren't trivia sections discouraged on Wikipedia?  and it seems like the info there is unnecessary...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theriusthechronicler (talk • contribs) 20:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there still a trivia Section? 

message: I just found a single that Dallas has created named 'Live At The Verge'.  It only contains 2 tracks but I am sure it should be mentioned.  More info on the single is here.  http://social.zune.net/album/City-and-Colour/Live-At-The-Verge-(2-Track-Single)/61f62402-0100-11db-89ca-0019b92a3933/details Mackenziepricee (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live At The Verge 

message: I think this page should be merged with Dallas Green, as City and Colour is Dallas Green. --101.161.29.112 (talk) 07:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No City and Colour isn't Dallas Green. Dallas has an article because he individually is notable, while City and Colour is a distinct project. City and Colour has also become a four piece band including Dallas' brother if you read the album notes notes of Little Hell. Jonjonjohny (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This article currently states in the lede's first sentence that the article is about a recording alias belonging to Dallas Green . It also states the only band member in the associated project is Dallas Green himself. The member list after him is separate and designated "other back up". In its current state a merge is entirely appropriate. - Steve3849talk 22:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Dallas Green 

message: City and Colour first played Silver and Gold, O'Sister, Murderer and Grinnin' In Your Face on their Canadian Fall Tour in 2009, not their 2010 Europe Tour. I was there, and there are videos on YouTube to prove this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.173.56.103 (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 Canadian Fall Tour 
Talk:Chitty

message: hey,
just wondering...
is there any relation between the two?
Do they also keep caste distinctions?
Domsta333 13:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chitty-Chetty? 

message: It could be the subject of this article, then Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, then chitty (slang for cheque), and Chitty as a surname, I believe it exists.--J.b p.b 101 (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This could have a disambiguation? 

message: Hey guys, just a small contribution..
The Melaka Chitty's are a clan. The clan started of in a small village a.k.a 'Kampung' in the  malay language located in Gajah Berang Melaka.
The Chitty's comprise of a few family names, not just only people with the Chitty surname as we do have ppl from a other surnames that belong in the clan. However, there are some of us who still keep the 'chitty' name going.. :)
Today, a very big portion of the clan has moved out of the village and have migrated to areas like Melaka town, Kuala Lumpur and Singapore. There is a significant group of Melaka Chitty's in Singapore as well.
I've lost quite a lot of my Chitty roots but am keen to still save as much of it's culture as i can.. :)  
Regards, 
Prashan Chitty a.k.a [Mr. P!] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chittyboy (talk • contribs) 04:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Melaka Chitty 
Talk:Shrone Hill

message: Please note that the place name is called "Shronell", not "Shronel". I have made a page about the area which u might be interested at looking over. Search "Shronell" in wikipedia and it should pop up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daithiocondun (talk • contribs) 16:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOTE
Talk:Margaret Sambiria

message: To change this from Margaret to Margrethe is very inappropriate. Current Danish spelling was not in use in those days, thus such formulation does not make sense. And, to other nationalities she was Margaret. (It should be notred that she was not born Danish.) Arrigo 06:06, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Left-wing terrorism

message: I've read the comments above, and I still don't know why this is being nominated for deletion. 
Everyone above seems to have complaints centered around a single point; that this article could use a serious update. It could be more detailed, and that is doable. 
I think this page should be left up and should be updated as needed,one because left wing terrorism is a thing, and it would be nice if we could read about it like we cna read about right wing terrorism, and two because Wikipedia is all about neutrality, and having a page on right wing terrorism, and then deleting the one about left wing terrorism seems a bit non neutral, no? 
Yes, the page in question is shaky, but why not build on what is there, instead of deleting it all together? Ladytethys (talk) 03:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Miss(?) Account-that-was-made-today, you should share your thoughts over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left-wing terrorism (2nd nomination), because that is where the actual deletion discussion is taking place. Yue🌙 03:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That editor made 2 edits and vanished. Doug Weller talk 15:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this up for deletion?  

message: Is an image of the aftermath of the 1983 United States Senate bombing a good example of 'left-wing terrorism'? Neither Resistance Conspiracy case nor even 1983 United States Senate bombing itself emphasize the 'left-wing' ideology of the perpetrators. It's also odd to use an image of a relatively obscure bombing which is not even mentioned in the body of the article. This bombing was also in a country which, per the article has had only a single far-left attack in the past two decades. This bombing seems like an unusual case, and therefor doesn't seem like a good example of the entire topic.  Grayfell (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Winslow Township, New Jersey

message: Deleted reference to communities as this is not a relavant topic. Communities listed were subdivisions commonly refered to as developments. The developments listed were mostly in the Sicklerville section. I replaced the communities with the actual villages that were incorporated into Winslow Twp.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.237.77 (talk) 02:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fela Kuti

message: the music section looks like it was lifted from an autobiography or something.
it doesn't read like a dispassionate review of his music.
it needs to be changed to a less biased and no glorification of Mr Kuti's work.
wikipedia is supposed to be dispassionate, not an advert.82.9.94.243 (talk) 08:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music section 

message: I excised the following paragraph, as it seems to be more appropriate for the Afrobeat article:
 —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyeditor passing by 

message: I'm missing his private life section, as well as his relationship with women. I was interested in reading how he treated women. Also, it would have been good to further elaborate on his AIDS denial. 41.203.83.58 (talk) 06:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing private life section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ademi890 (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music 209
Talk:Ken Scott

message: Why hasn't this article ever been flagged for containing absolutely no citations at all? Luna65 (talk) 01:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unable to find any online WP:RS for exact place or date of birth. FreeBMD has two possibilities in London for the second quarter 1947:
:Kenneth M., mother's name Beszant, Westminster.
:Kenneth E., mother's name Norris, Hammersmith.
Not sure if one of these is him. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date and place of birth