lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:François' langur

message: Is this correct? "Before 1990, Francois' Langur could be found in 23 different countries"
What 23 countries would that be?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.232.24.252 (talk) 13:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the references talks about 23 counties within the province of Guangxi. Sorry it took so long to correct! Cheers, Jack (talk) 13:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: Per ABC source. I was wondering how significant this is, though considering they are endangered possibly any birth in captivity is significant?
Also includes this info not in the artcile:
:"...usually born with bright orange hair, ... Their hair slowly changes until it becomes black when they are about one-year-old."
- 220 of Borg 10:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby langur born at Taronga Zoo
Talk:Tonkin snub-nosed monkey

message: — Assignment last updated by Ilk12 (talk) 04:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biology Inquiry and Observation
Talk:Gray-shanked douc

message: http://www.occupyforanimals.org/three-vietnamese-soldiers-tortured-and-skinning-alive-before-eviscerating-and-barbecuing-two-rare-monkeys.html
http://our-compass.org/2012/10/22/charge-soldiers-who-tortured-monkey/
http://www.change.org/petitions/vietnam-punish-the-animal-abusers-who-tortured-and-killed-the-two-monkeys
http://forcechange.com/27601/demand-justice-for-endangered-monkeys-killed-in-vietnam/
http://www.thanhniennews.com/society/vietnam-soldiers-punished-after-posting-gruesome-photos-of-monkeys-5989.html
Rajmaan (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnamese soldiers tortured and skinned monkey 
Template talk:NLM

message: I added a second parameter, that allows entry of a "display name". If none is entered, the default is "overview of condition", rather than the page name, because in most cases the page names are not well formatted for Wikipedia. In particular, spaces between words appear to be absent.--Srleffler 04:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

message: For some reason this template misbehaves if you preface it with a bullet. Could this be fixed? JFW | T@lk 22:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the same today: if preceded by a bullet, the bullet does not show up.--SidP (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullet
Talk:American Thinker

message: I've just removed the  tag which user  recently added. My reasons:
*The arguments from the AfD still hold.
*As mentioned at that AfD, it has been cited by Melanie Morgan in a December 2006 column, and by a columnist for The Calgary Sun.
*The website is #57 in the ecosystem
*Less importantly, the conservative (and, to a lesser extent, libertarian) blogs I read keep referencing it.
I'll try to work the relevant info into the article in the next week or so. Cheers, CWC 16:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: :Writing in The New York Times, Felicity Barringer credited American Thinker with initiating a public outcry over a California plan to require programmable thermostats which could be controlled by officials in the event of power supply difficulties.
How is this "criticism"?  Some would call it "being influential".  The only way it can be considered criticism is if the writer disagrees with raising a public outcry over this particular issue.  Without passing judgement on the right-or-wrong of the thermostat issue (which would get us sidetracked), I would respectfully suggest that this Headline does not represent a neutral point-of-view but instead hints at the author's disagreement with the American Thinker website's position on the issue
, and should either be amended to reflect a neutral point of view or deleted altogether. --Insley (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism or Influence? 

message: Presently we cite What are all those voting-booth zombies waiting for? , an old op-ed from the Orlando Sentinel, which only  mentions AT in passing. I don't doubt that AT is conservative, but we need a RS to actually say so. --Pete Tillman (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a better cite for  AT as Conservative
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musical Instruments

message: There is a quite well known instrument, the kalimba. It is derived from a type of instrument for which the most accurate description would probably be African lamellophone. There are dozens of these instruments, each with different designs and names.
Right now, kalimba redirects to an article called mbira. The article claims that the kalimba is a direct descendant from the mbira. I think this is not entirely accurate, and although it serves the purpose of pointing out the unique Africanness of this type of instrument, it does a disservice to the countless of other African lamellophones in existence, which I don't think are referred to as "mbiras" by most experts. Maybe in common parlance some people refer to them as mbiras, but this would likely be a result of the Wikipedia article itself. The kalimba is much more similar to the sanza than it is to the mbira.
I think there should be a separate article for African lamellophones, with a list of all the different known types and their origin, including the mbira and kalimba. Mbira and kalimba should have their own articles, because there's enough sources to write articles about them. 
I want to do this, but I need some emotional support throughout my journey, especially cause I've never written a Wikipedia article before. So please, be the first to comment on my talk page and I'll use you to get myself enough motivation to write these articles. --KalimbaEnjoyer (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  African lamellophones 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chris Williams (metal drummer)#Requested move 26 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Chris Williams (metal drummer)#Requested move 26 January 2024]] 

message: If you have any opinions on use of eight-foot pitch notation for organ stops or wind instruments (e.g. 8′ or 16′ etc.), there is a discussion on the Manual of Style  Dates and Numbers talk page. Any useful input appreciated. It seems that current MOS rules preclude the use of the prime character to denote the foot as a unit, e.g. 8′ (prime) vs 8' (apostrophe) but this notation is more or less de-rigueur in music literature. — Jon (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pitch nomenclature in the WP:MOS 

message: The discussion is: Talk:Jew%27s harp#Requested move 19 March 2024. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move on Jew's harp

message: nd Brazilian Rosewood 24.230.105.223 (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violin Bow sells for over $600,000
Talk:Dominique Phinot

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it could use a works listing, an image, and inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions or comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 22:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review

message: I realise that the concept of 'homosexuality' is of recent creation, so I doubt that Dominique Phinot was 'executed for homosexuality' as claimed. He may have been executed for sodomy or some other charge. I am unable to access the reference to see the exact wording used in the source. Can anyone clarify? Cheers Fishiehelper2 (talk) 11:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Homosexual practices" is the wording Roger Jacob uses.  You might want to consult the primary source -- it's Girolamo Cardano (Jerome Cardan), the Theonoston.  It's in Latin, but someone may have translated it into English (I've never seen such a thing ... but it seems like someone would have by now).  The Hyperion biography mentions it too.  This is the same source from which we have the juicy bits about Nicolas Gombert, who was sent to the galleys for (allegedly) sodomizing his choirboys. Antandrus  (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Fishiehelper2 (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Executed for homosexuality? 
Talk:Jacopo Saltarelli

message: I have deleted the pic because: 
* user:Thyra uploaded it to Wiki Commons from a Blog Page. 
* The blog writer says that it is called the Incarnate Angel and dates from about 1515. 
* Art historians generally call the drawing the Incarnate Angel and date it at about 1515. 
* user:Thora cites the blog page and yet calls it Jacopo Saltarelli, and coolly dates it 1475, about 40 years before its assumed date of creation.  
* The pic closely relates to Leonardo's John the Baptist, a work of his old age. (ie 1515 not 1475) 
* It almost certainly represents Leonardo's servant/companion Salai. 
* if this picture is indeed 1475, then it is of great importance in Leonardo's oevre, as it would predate any existing drawing by four years. 
* I am having great difficulty assuming good faith over this one! I have asked user:Thyra for an explanation as to why it was uploaded as Salatrelli and given a date forty years too early. 
Amandajm (talk) 11:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Leonardo Pic

message: I saw another contributor said he or she was considering deleting this article, asserting the individual was not notable.
It reminded me of an  I participated in a few years ago.  That  claimed an author from the 19th Century wasn't notable -- because he barely rated a handful of passing references through his google search.  And the reply I found convincing and very memorable agreed that any author, writing today, who generated that few hits, would not be notable.  But, given how rapidly books go out of print they suggested any 19th Century author who is still remembered at all today should be considered notable.
So, should the same hold true of Mr Saltarelli?  Geo Swan (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A glance through Archive.org's OCR transcriptions of books shows Saltarelli dealt with in "Leonardo The Florentine A Study In Personality", "Leonardo Da Vinci An Account Of His Development", "LENOARDO DA VINCI THE TRAGIC PURSUIT OF PERFECTION" and a number of non-English works. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  00:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would apply another test: how likely is it that someone will want to find out more information about this man. Considering his pivotal role in the early life of Da Vinci (it landed him in jail) I would imagine there would be quite a few curious. Is there a way to see how many people have accessed an article? Haiduc (talk) 02:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Henrik's Wikipedia article traffic statistics shows daily traffic for any month. It shows Jacopo Saltarelli had about 30 hits each day, and 848 in all of June. Leonardo da Vinci gets over 10,000 daily. 84user (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is still getting between 12-30 hits a day. Amandajm (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  hangon 

message: The complaint says he lives with his brother goldsmith (apprentice). There is said to have compensation. Why then is called a male prostitute?--Enrique Cordero (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male prostitute?
Talk:John Atherton

message: Do we have any more information on said law? (Albert Mond (talk) 02:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Law in Question
Talk:Muretus

message: Consensus seems to be that his name was either Marc Antoine Muret or Marc-Antoine Muret, Latinized to Muretus.  Muretus seems to be the name by which he is most notable.  For consistency, I've changed Marc Antoni Muret to Marc Antoine Muret, and have synchronized "Muret" versus "Muretus" to fit context in both Muretus and Joseph Justus Scaliger.  If there is reason to further edit any of these names please explain here.  Tcraven (talk) 20:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Universal Service Administrative Company

message: I reinserted the NECA reference. It's a verifiable and meaningful relationship.
http://www.neca.org/source/NECA_AboutUs_279.asp "NECA is authorized to establish a subsidiary to administer universal service. The subsidiary, Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) is incorporated in Delaware. NECA aids the FCC in establishing the two unaffiliated corporations, called the Schools and Libraries Corporation (SLC) and the Rural Health Care Corporation (RHCC). SLC contracts with NECA to perform many of the administrative duties associated with the schools and libraries program."
PuerExMachina 05:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mark S. Wrighton

message: There is a report Mr. Wrighton has supported the idea of censoring a student at GWU who made some posters critical of the Chinese Government - I think this should be in the article, anyone against it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:1CD0:1710:9D90:BE1:8BE8:F155 (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See , if still relevant Alan Peakall (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free Speech controversy at GWU 

message: The current wiki page for Mark Wrighton is confusing.  The Infobox incorrectly lists him as the Interim President of the George Washington University.  His term at GWU expired on June 30, 2022.  He is currently the James and Mary Wertsch Distinguished University Professor and Chancellor Emeritus at Washington University in St. Louis.  This is correctly noted in the first paragraph but not corrected in the Infobox.  As I am no longer able to make changes to this page, it would be helpful if someone else would correct the Infobox.  Thank you. Stonejg1 (talk) 13:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Wiki page is confusing
Talk:Walter Hungerford, 1st Baron Hungerford of Heytesbury

message: As far as I know the place is and always has been Heytesbury. I have "corrected" the spelling in a new page, and changed internal links to the page. If I'm right, this page should be deleted. Richard Keatinge (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is linked to from List of people executed for homosexuality and is categorized under "People prosecuted under anti-homosexuality laws." If this is the case, there should be some mention of this in the body of the article. Acsenray (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of homosexuality in body of article

message: :See also this section on User talk:And we drown
The ODNB (a 21 century source) states:
The problem with the assumption of executed for buggery is a synthesis. He is more likely to have been executed for treason, as was his patron Cromwell at the the same time. The second synthesis is that it is being assumed that his act of buggery was sodomy, there is no evidence given in the source that this was the case. For this article to be included in the category "People prosecuted under anti-homosexuality laws" is easy because it is stated that he was, but to date no reliable source has been provided that he was executed for sodomy and not the more serious charge of high treason, so until such a source is included the category "People executed for sodomy" is inappropriate. To be included one needs a reliable source that joins the dots. The problem there is that the specific primary sources do not seem to exist, so that a good reliable source would probably only be able to state what the ONDB states.
To include the category "People executed for sodomy" we need a source that sates that he was executed for buggery and not for some other offence, and secondly that his offence of buggery was sodomy (It was not clearly defined in the buggery act (that came about thought case law) and this was the first known prosecution so there was no case law).  At the moment including this category "People executed for sodomy" is a double double synthesis -- PBS (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buggery
Talk:Graniterock

message: This text on Graniterock's history is allowed by Graniterock.  Much of this text is posted at graniterock.com.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Patrickjean (talk • contribs) 05:16, 26 January 2007  (UTC)
.  Note: this permission only speaks to the text copyright and not to the quality of the article or the notability of its subject.Bastiq▼e demandez 16:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just making note: the bulk of the current article was added on 2007-08-22 (ids 152966372 to 153016578) by someone at 207.215.223.2.  That IP address is currently registered to Graniterock Co of Watsonville, CA, per ARIN.  The IP block is 207.215.223.0/24, originally registered on 1998-09-16, updated on 2003-05-29.
- Peter Kaminski (talk) 03:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship
Talk:National Exchange Carrier Association

message: The relationship between NECA and USAC is verifiable and meaningful. Unless they divested and I just can't find any documents about it, NECA is the sole stockholder in USAC. If you search fcc.gov for NECA and USAC you will find language such as "we direct NECA and USAC..." from as recent as 2007.
PuerExMachina 05:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Terrill Rundle

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "piglakest" :
** http://www.abertasource.ca/methodist/The_Missions/Pigeon_Lake_Establishment.htm
** .
* "lxiii" :
** Rundle, R: "The Rundle Journals", lxiii. Glenbow Institute, 1977
** .
DumZiBoT (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 
Talk:Grossular

message: It would seem logical to merge all its varities into the grossular page, including hessonite and tsavorite.
Strickja (talk) 09:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Varieties can be merged if gemology & jewelery agrees. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/WLU-Mystar/Proposed decision

message: "Party A shall not interact with, or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about, Party B, on any page in Wikipedia. Should Party A do so, he may be blocked by any administrator for a short time, up to one week."
I have not seen this kind of remedy proposed before.  I like it very much.  I think it strikes at the heart of most interpersonal disputes.  Was this your idea, Kirill?  --Ideogram 09:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's adapted from the Everyking 3 case, actually, which had a similar remedy. Kirill Lokshin 13:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I had that concern too. Thatcher131 12:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming that it's not one of the articles covered by remedy 3, yes; only one of them should really be editing a particular article (although non-substantial edits would probably pass unnoticed).  Frankly, I don't think it's a problem; there are thousands of other editors around, so neither of the two needs to get involved with the other. Kirill Lokshin 13:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed remedy 

message: I am well satisfied by the outcome and decisions of the case, thanks to the arbitration committee.  WLU 14:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Condifidential questions may be addressed to any arbitrator by email.  --Ideogram 22:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks
File talk:Fiat Lux Canticle map.png

message: um, you put Leibowitz Abbey too far to the northwest. A map at the beginning of "Saint Leibowitz and the Wild Horse Woman" has the abbey on the west side of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Santa Fe, New Mexico. Furthermore, you failed to label the important town of Valana, seat of the refugee Popes from New Rome, which is somewhere within earshot of our Colorado Springs, CO (Pobla = Pueblo, CO, Danfer = Denver, CO, and Valana is midway between them, I reckon.) 204.52.215.107 05:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  errata 

message: needed? Arlo James Barnes 21:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  to SVG
Talk:Peter J. Gomes

message: I removed the link to the video previously cited because the video no longer exists on King's site.Trucker11 (talk) 11:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have removed a parenthetical comment "(Harvard having shed its original Boston Unitarian roots centuries before)" that was placed as a modifier in the sentence about "Harvard's official interfaith chaplains".  It is simply false.
Harvard was founded in 1636...as a Puritan/Congregationalist seminary.  There were NO Unitarian congregations in Massachusetts until 1782... And it wasn't until the early 1800s that Unitarianism began it's heyday... Harvard, University, Church and Divinity School, indeed has a Unitarian era...  BUT it's not "original" nor "roots" nor "centuries before"...
I know this as a minister of one of the six congregations that founded Harvard; but you can see it all yourself if you read the History of Harvard and the Unitarianism articles here in Wikipedia.  The author of this mis-statement may think that the fact that Harvard University's Memorial Chapel has many, interfaith chaplains needs to be explained...  But the sentence I removed does NOT correctly explain that fact.  
I also think it is incorrect to suggest that Rev. Gomes was merely one of many chaplains:  He is "The" Pusey Minister at Harvard's Memorial Church...  That is the top, senior ministerial position in the church.  The Chaplains program is in addition and beyond that...Harvard Chaplains are often head clergy of their own churches elsewhere.  
There are little pieces of misinformation here...  Needs to be cleaned up.  
Plummer Chair would need clarification if "Pusey Minister" does, no?
Emyth (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Career Affiliations edit 
Talk:Rembert S. Truluck

message: Do we know why the site has been taken down and left only as a mirror?  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The original Truluck.com site 

message: According to the front page of the mirror linked to from this wikipedia page, Truluck has died. 89.200.74.108 (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Ponzu

message: i always thought it was just soy sauce with lemon juice in it. 205.174.22.25 05:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Coronal suture

message: The top most image in this article doesn't even show the coronal suture.  To what purpose was it placed in this article? Professor marginalia 05:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ! This issue has since been corrected. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 22:34, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top image 

message: does coronal suture depicts age??????????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.27.37 (talk) 12:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  coronal ,other sutures and age
Talk:KELG

message: I'm fairly certain I'm listening to this station right now but since I have a dial-type receiver (not-digital) I'm not 100% certain; however, the station I'm listening to has the slogan "La Luz de Austin" and plays Spanish Contemporary Christian music (it's really good!). Check out the bottom of this page, too:  Friendlyliz 05:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slogan?
Talk:Skidmore Fountain

message: * http://proxy.multcolib.org:2084/resources/doc/nb/image/v2%3A11A73E5827618330%40EANX-NB-12E897AD2AA08F62%402438946-12E69DFB8620C453%4013-12E8AB041A51EA40%40?p=AMNEWS ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources