lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vladimir de Pachmann

message: Maybe it should read: Blickstein via Mitchell.  Isn't that the book with content Blickstein recognized as his work, because it had unmistakably plagiarized his mistakes?   "God in creating man somewhat overestimated his abilities." -  Oscar Wilde  (*_*) Moshe-paz 07:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Note for future editors. A short biography (popular in style) of Vladimir Pachmann can be found in the book:
Modern Musicians by J. Cuthbert Hadden (First published by T.N.Foulis in 1913) - (my copy is the September 1918 Foulis reprint)
I'm using my copy but four public domain copies are available at the Internet Archive. Here's two of those:
http://archive.org/details/modernmusiciansb00haddiala
http://archive.org/details/cu31924022415297
I have a different image in my book. A photograph. I will scan it and add it to this article. I will not be removing the existing image.
Sluffs (talk) 10:03, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Musicians by J. Cuthbert Hadden 

message: I haven't found anything about whether his birth date was under the Julian or Gregorian calendar. Is there anything out there? --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There's this, which gives his dates as 15/27 July. It may be suitable as a source. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date calendar?
Talk:U.S. Route 6 in Colorado

message: The following segments are listed:
*6A-6C, I-70 exit 11 to I-70 exit 44 (split by I-70 Bus. in Grand Junction)
*6M, overpass east of I-70 exit 62 to CR 215 near I-70 exit 75
*6L, I-70 exit 87 to SH 13 north west of I-70 exit 90
*6D, SH 13 south near I-70 exit 90 to I-70 exit 109
*6K, west for 0.338 mi from SH 82 near I-70 exit 116 (mileposts reset)
*6E, I-70 exit 140 to I-70 exit 171
*6F, I-70 exit 205 to I-70 exit 216
*6G, I-70 exit 244 to I-25 exit 209B
*6H, I-70 exit 276A to I-76 exit 9
*6I, I-76 exit 64 to I-76 exit 66A
*6J, I-76 exit 92 to Nebraska
*6Z, westbound in Sterling (mileposts reset)
It looks like all but 6K and 6M are part of the through route.  calls 6K a spur, and that site doesn't mention 6M at all. --NE2 08:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What's part of the route and what's a spur?
Talk:New FM

message: Someone should verify the spelling of Varity Webb's name. Are we sure it isn't Verity? Kyriosity 23:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varity Webb 

message: Some of the content added on 20 May 2007 in this edit has been found in this article dated 24 April 2007, making it a copyright violation, although the last part of what was added, seems to indicate that the content was originally from NewFM itself. For that reason, I am reverting that edit, which removes a fair chunk of text. --AussieLegend2 (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:3SH

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: no further comments at this time  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:3BA

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is a mini-stub  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:Mudugar

message: Wiki Raja 11:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations
Talk:Cashibo people

message: I agree that this article should be split in a disambig page; it contains information on two entirely different subjects that fall under this term.  Removed the wikify tag today, since no wikification (formatting the lead and sections, especially) can be performed until that is resolved.  *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 08:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Bristol blue glass

message: OK - I see you or somebody else has worked on the article, and it is looking better, so yea, it's ok if it stays.  I learned something from this article, which is always good. Maybe you can include pictures or something.  Have a good day. Saber girl08 12:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK 
Talk:Hits Radio South Yorkshire

message: Following discussion at the dispute resolution noticeboard, I have a general comment about names in lists.  If a person does have an article, it is true that that indicates that they are considered notable.  (Lack of notability is a reason, the most common reason. to delete an article via Articles for Deletion.)  However, there can be people who do not have articles who are nonetheless thought to be notable.  That is the case if an article would be appropriate but has not yet been written about the person.  In such a case, if their name is enclosed in brackets, it will be appear in red as a red link.  That is a way of indicating that the writing of an article about the person is encouraged.  So, we don't need to remove names because articles don't exist.  We can instead decide that the article should exist and list the name in red as an encouragement to write the article.  (To be sure, if an article contains too many redlinks, it both looks sloppy and tends to indicate that names are being overlinked.)
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on Lists
Talk:Hugh of France (son of Robert II)

message: As well as Theis thinking that Hugh died in 1025, the New Cambridge Medieval History (IV:124) agrees. On Google books Behrends' The Letters and Poems of Fulbert of Chartres (lxxx, note 30) says 1025, as does Elisabeth VanHouts (ed.), The Normans in Europe, p. 193. As far as 1026 goes, Gauvaud's La France au Moyen Âge shows Hugh's death date as 1026, but in a genealogical table (p. 531) rather than the actual text. Most but not quite all of the material which lists 1026 is very old. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 08:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: 9 or 19th? Heraldica says 19. Michael  Sanders 14:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Theis's book gives 9, as does this page. The :fr:Chronologie des sacres des rois de France page says Sunday 9 June, and 9 June in 1017 appears to have been a Sunday. To be honest, it's amazing that we know the month and year of his coronation and death: whether it was the 9th or the 19th is pretty minor. I'd go with the 9th and put in a footnote to the effect that some say the 19th. Looking at things, I'd guess that the answer is that it used to be dated to the 19th and someone, somewhere rethought it and that the 9th became the accepted date from the late C19th. Chronology and synchronisms are black arts indeed. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 16:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coronation
Talk:RLJ Entertainment

message: This article could use a re-write.  As it stands, it's just a bit too promotional in tone, although not blatantly so.  I don't think it's bad enough to deserve being tagged with "newrelease" or "advert" tags, because it largely sticks to facts and presents them fairly straight-forwardly, but I do think someone with a feel for the subject could give it a good massage. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs rewrite

message: Needs careful checking, what interests an encyclopaedia's readership does not necessarily match what aa PR team ant to say. Rich Farmbrough, 15:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Has been "updated by PR team"

message: The Key People section should be changed from:
*Ted Green (Chairman and CEO)
*John Hyde (Vice Chairman)
*John Avagliano (COO and CFO)
*Bill Bromiley (CAO)
To the following corrected version:
*Robert L. Johnson (Chairman)
*Miguel Penella (CEO)
*Drew Wilson (CFO)
*Bill Bromiley (CAO)
Please also include a contact phone number of (818) 407-9100 in the top right section.
Data supplied by RLJ Entertainment at OTRS2013100410011419  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, I have not added the phone number. I did update the CEO and CFO. However, as I understand it, Robert L. Johnson is the chairman of the parent company, not Image itself, so I have not mentioned him here. Thanks. Maralia (talk) 14:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit
Talk:John Harington, 1st Baron Harington of Exton

message: I believe this was the fellow who invented the expression "none dare call it treason," which became a John Birch catchphrase during the Cold War.  If so, shouldn't the fact be mentioned here? Christofurio (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This quote is attributed to John Harington, the writer born 1560, inventor of the flush toilet snd alleged ancestor of Kit Harrington.  As near as I can tell, the quote is not attributed to John Harington, 1st Baron Harington of Exton, born 1539/40. just Eleos 09:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of sports venues in Australia

message: Is there any reason why Skilled Park (aka Robina Stadium) on the Gold Coast has been omitted?222.152.26.159 (talk) 04:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there any large horse or dog racetracks in Australia? If so, shouldn't they be in this article? How about auto race tracks, or are those only in the US? AnteaterZot 06:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tracks

message: Seeing as the ARC is now defunct, I think we should remove all ARC teams and their stadiums (if they are sole tenants) because they no longer play at the highest domestic level.Morstar (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of ARC Stadia
Talk:The Journey of Man

message: This article is (probably) a lot of nonsense. The red flag for me was the stuff about the San languages.
#There's no such thing as a San "language". There are numerous KhoiSan peoples who speak several Khoisan languages (note the plural).
#These languageS are not the only ones on Earth which use click consonants.
#No contemporary linguist would seriously describe the KhoiSan languages, with their numerous complex clicks, consonant clusters, numerous vowels, and tones as "archaic." Mandarin is a much simpler language than most, yet no one ever describes the people or their language as archaic.
These are only the issues I'm vaguely familiar with. I imagine that someone more knowledgeable me would find many, many more blatant falsities than I did.
Either the person who wrote this or their source obviously didn't know what they were talking about.
Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 08:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: The page appears to be written basing on a single source, so it has no rights to squat on a general title, Human genetic history, which I redirected to where a multiple-source NPOV text  is being written, Human evolutionary genetics. `'Miikka 17:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: The evidence presented in the book suggests that our ancestors spent a considerable time in the ocean, obviously pursuing seafood.  The Aquatic Ape Hypothesis suggests that many of our adaptations during that time were the foundations towards our species eventually becoming an aquatic mammal, similar to seals and whales.  Perhaps other researchers have acknowledged this correlation and could be cited in this article.Landroo (talk) 12:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correlation with the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis 

message: :"The earliest groups of humans are believed to find their present-day descendants among the San people, a group that is now found in western southern Africa."
By definition, every person on Earth is the present-day descendant of the earliest humans, so is this really what Wells is saying? —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 19:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding? 

message: The Atlas of the Human Journey site has moved, it is now https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/human-journey/ and is called Map of Human Migration.
100.15.117.207 (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  link rot
Talk:2006 V8 Supercar season

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is at the higher end of start class. However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 04:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:Parity game

message: The definition given does not match the notion of a "parity game". To my knowledge, a parity game is a two-player board game where board positions are assigned natural numbers, so called priorities. The winner of a finite play in a parity game is the player whose opponent gets stuck. The winner of an infinite play is determined by the priorities of infinitely often occuring board positions. Typically, player 0 wins an infinite play if the highest priority of an infinitely often occuring positions is even. Whence "parity".
Historyfree (or positional) determinacy that is refered to in the definition is a mere property of parity games that was shown by Mostowski and independently Jutla and Emerson.
Are there conflicting notions in Game Theory that I am not aware of? Is there a source of the definition given in the article?
Christian.kissig 08:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

message: That we need to link to Rabin's tree theorem or something like that once it's written. Tijfo098 (talk) 03:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: There seems to be a consensus now that Parity Games can be solved in quasipolynomial time. See for example the references listed here:
* Deciding Parity Games in Quasipolynomial Time (PDF), by Cristian S. Calude, Sanjay Jain, Bakhadyr Khoussainov, Wei Li, and Frank Stephan.
* A short proof of correctness of the quasi-polynomial time algorithm for parity games, by Hugo Gimbert and Rasmus Ibsen-Jensen.
* Succinct progress measures for solving parity games, by Marcin Jurdziński and Ranko Lazić.
An implementation and comparison with previous approaches is available (classic strategy improvement "wins" on random instances, but gets "slow" on Friedmann’s trap examples):
* An Ordered Approach to Solving Parity Games in Quasi Polynomial Time and Quasi Linear Space, by John Fearnley, Sanjay Jain, Sven Schewe, Frank Stephan, Dominik Wojtczak
Jakito (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent quasipolynomial time algorithms
Talk:2004 V8 Supercar season

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is at the higher end of start class. However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 04:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:2001 Shell Championship Series

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is at the higher end of start class but lacks any referencing - not including the official site link there is no way of a reader easily verifying the content - please including inline referencing. However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 04:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:2007 Clipsal 500

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article is at the higher end of start class. However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 04:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

message: I propose to change the title back to the 2007 Clipsal 500. I know that the overall event is known (in some places) as the Adelaide 500, but the 2007 version of the race is the 2007 Clipsal 500, as noted on the offical V8 Supercar website (http://www.v8supercar.com.au/calendars/clndrevent.asp?eid=225&ind=M). Therefore the title should follow the V8 Supercar event title. Birky21 03:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Ford Theatre

message: The Ford Theatre radio series dramatized many classic works had many notable performers and would benefit from having an episode guide. For example, classic books "Wuthering Heights"
and A Farewell to Arms were dramatized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.155.35.130 (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode guide needed 

message: A brief radio log for this series can be found at 
The Old Time Radio Researchers
Beshires (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ford Theater 

message: I'd like to place 3 external links -
Old Time Radio Researchers Home  This link would include artwork for CD and Jewel covers for disks of the programs.
The OTRR Library. You can download episodes here.
and
The Old Time Radio Database
Is there a problem??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beshires (talk • contribs) 01:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The CD art is devised by OTRR and thus not at all original to the 1940s radio show. The library link needs a name and password. The database link to item #2292 doesn't has some information including an extensive list of people who were involved, but the source of this information is not made clear, so it is not verifiable per WP:V standards. I don't think any of these links are in the best interest of this article. Binksternet (talk) 02:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: i need to know its exact location or street adress in washington abraham lincoln was one of my ansestors and i want to know what town he died in. its true that in 1865 washington city was not co-exstensive with the county and district of colombia. id like to clear this matter up as soon as possible so i can have my entry on ansestry.com as acurate as possible.
69.208.14.63 (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You want Ford's Theatre, 511 10th Street Northwest, Wash. DC. Binksternet (talk) 14:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  where is this theatre located? 

message: "While We're Young" redirects to this article. The article does not mention "While We're Young." I was trying to find out what "While We're Young" is. Not the movie, but something else, maybe a book? I still have no idea. There should not be a redirect to a page that doesn't even mention the topic. I can't fix this because I still don't know what "While We're Young" is. Frustrating. Sylvia A (talk) 01:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  While We're Young?
Talk:Sorex

message: Two species seem to be missing from this page: Sorex vulgaris and Sorex pygmaeus. Any idea why? There's no redirect or anything; searching for either on Wikipedia results in nothing. The rest of the web seems to think they're valid species, though. 75.211.171.75 (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We follow MSW3 for the most part when it comes to mammal species listings. MSW3 lists vulgaris as a synonym for Sorex araneus and pygmaeus as a synonym for Sorex minutus. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:50, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: missing
Talk:The Clique (novel)

message: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/books/bestseller/0622bestchildren.html?scp=1&sq=The+Clique+Lisi+Harrison&st=nyt The New York Times bestsellers list currently shows these books to be at the top 1, 6, and 8 spots in the paperback section.  I'm curious if anyone knows the sales figures for each of the books?  That is information which would be quite fitting for an encyclopedian entry. Dream Focus (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales figures