lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Russian songs

message: There is a very important Russian folk song missing form this list: во саду ли в  огооде (vo sadu li v ogorode, which means 'in the Garden'). Many westerners would recognise it, as it has been used in several cartoons and movies to portray Russians. --Pinnecco 00:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Parallel processing (psychology)

message: Perhaps this could be combined with and automatically link to parallel computing? This page seem rather redundant considering the size of the parallel computing page.
--beefpelican
Processing and computing are two aspects of the same idea: serial and parallel forms exist in both. Computing tends to be processor/computer oriented, but other forms exist besides digital processors: analog, optical, biological. Parallel processing as applied to biology indicates different hardware (organs, tissues, nerves) dividing up a task to improve the survival chances of the organism. The visual cortex is the historical version of this type of study. I favor making this a disambiguation page. C.S.Davidson
:The computer based aspect should be, certainly. However, the brain-based portion should be in a separate article. You could either leave that here, or make Parallel processing a disambiguation page, and move the brain information to something like Parallel processing (brain). I favor the latter, as that helps reduce the chance that future editors adding computer based info into the brain article. -- 15:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I marked this article for cleanup because it seems to be more about machine vision than about parallel processing. Finn zee Fox 19:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Machine Vision

message: I suggest deleting this page, as it only very briefly covers parallel processing in the brain, not parallel processing in general, and even in this much smaller scope it isn't really of much use. I feel a search query of 'parallel processing' should instead redirect to the 'parallel computing' page.
Davehodgson333 (talk) 16:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete This Page

message: Hello everyone. Over the course of the month, I have been collecting information and finding new sources for improving the article, most of which is in my sandbox. I will be adding to the article over the course of this week, and welcome any suggestions or feedback! :)Sushi0506 (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding Article 

message: I think that the lead section can include more detail about the subject, it should also show an overview of what will be discussed late on (foreshadow the sections to come). Kemem9634 (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section could be improved 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kemem9634 (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3307 Adv Writing for the Sciences
Talk:Dem Bones

message: Dominus?
Domina?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD7:D045:0:350B:182E:90B9:274B (talk) 01:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domino 

message: Should the usage of the Delty Rhythm Boys Version of this song in the film "Rain Man" be mentioned?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.76.209.85 (talk) 19:25, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think so, then go ahead and add it. Be Bold!LogicalFinance33 (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture 

message: is it (or is it going to be) wikipedia policy to include the entire lyrics to songs? if so, this one's easy to fill in ... 71.191.126.175 (talk) 04:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, policy is generally not to include lyrics in their entirety.  Full text should only be placed on Wikisource, and then a link placed in the appropriate article. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 05:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Should Fred Waring and His Pennsylvanians also be listed in this article as they also have a very good recording of this piece and were, at their time, a prominent group?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubajoe0 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They are mentioned in the next section, citing the film their version was used in. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 18:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist Recordings 

message: The melody of this song is used in the classic children's song 'Alice the Camel', including the French language version 'Alice le chameau.'
Grandma Roses (talk) 17:42, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's song 

message: The article opens with "not to be confused with 'Dry Bones', a similar folk song.
It then continues to credit Basom Lamar Lunsford (with a misspelled first name) for the first recorded version of the song. But in trying to confirm this, I found a copy of said recording here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLAavP5DPeU
And it's not the same song! It's actually "Dry Bones," which is the song at the top was said "not to be confused with."
What a mess. I do not know the right answer, but this sure seems to be misinformation. And unfortunately Wikipedia is one of the few sources online, so the bad info is spreading.
MarcoEsc (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  Some IP address changed it in 2015; I've reverted it.  I don't know if the prior information is correct, though.  Joule36e5 (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article fundamentally incorrect? 

message: I removed the word "song" from the first line as redundant.  All spirituals are songs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 22:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spiritual" = "song"
Talk:Pedopenna

message: Where'd the great illustration go?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.61.10 (talk) 05:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Pedopenna daohugouensis (Xu & Zhang 2005) was a small eumaniraptoran dinosaur from the Late Jurassic from the Daohugou beds in China.
:The latest study (He et. al. 2004) places the Daohuhou beds as no earlier than the beginning of the Cretaceous. Too bad, would have been cool if this were pre-Archie. Dinoguy2 00:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: Gao and Ren (2006) conclude that the Daohugou Beds are Middle Jurassic in age, based on radiometric dating of ignimbrite from Inner Mongolia. They conclude the assertion that the Early Cretaceous age of these rocks proposed by He et. al. (2004) is inaccurate, because there is no evidence to suggest an overturned stratigraphic sequence. Therefore, the suggestion that Pedopenna existed earlier than Archaeopteryx is corroborated.
Gao K. & Ren D.: Radiometric Dating of Ignimbrite from Inner Mongolia Provides 
no Indication of a Post-Middle Jurassic Age for the Daohugou Beds, Acta 
Geologica Sinica English Edition 80(1), 42-45. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 20:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This ongoing debate has implications for a wide range of fossils, including the new glising mammal, Jinfengopteryx, Epidendrosaurus, etc. I'd keep in-depth examination of the issue to the Daohugou Beds article. Dinoguy2 00:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese geologists: Daohugou Beds are not post-Middle Jurassic
Talk:The Atlantic Paranormal Society

message: I have rewritten the members list section to only include notable members. That list in its previous form had major problems with both the Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability policies and was almost entirely unencyclopedic. I kept the honorary section because those people are notable. If we are going to add anyone's name to this list, they must be entirely notable and 100% verifiable with a fully cited reliable secondary source. Thoughts? roguegeek (talk·cont) 21:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members list 

message: They released it in 2009. I saw the [When?] next to "They recently," so I changed that to "In 2009, they."
--Yankees317 (talk) 01:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Book 

message: Paranormal investigator Benjamin Radford is quoted in this article as saying, "After watching episodes of Ghost Hunters and other similar programs, it quickly becomes clear to anyone with a background in science that the methods used are both illogical and unscientific."
However, this groups the reality show Ghost Hunters as being no different to other ghost-hunting television shows, especially those that came before it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but until Ghost Hunters, all other paranormal investigation teams on TV included a self-identified "psychic" on the investigations team, which Ghost Hunters is almost always without. These psychics were the ones who never participated in the debunking phase of the investigation, only in the "ooooh, this is spoooooky~! (WHAT WAS THAT?!)" phase. Many if not most criticisms of paranormal investigation is aimed at those investigators who rely more on FEELINGS than established scientific methods.
TAPS, and more specifically Ghost Hunters, changed the game significantly from feeling-based investigations to incorporating the use of modern technology (correctly or not), showing a positive movement towards methods accepted by the scientific community at large. And yet the criticisms section of the TAPS page doesn't give any leeway or recognition to TAPS for this.
[[[Signed anonymously, due to multiple past conflicts with Wikipedia's ever-shifting editorial standards.]]]68.100.138.56 (talk) 04:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benjamin Radford's criticisms... Biased?
Talk:Panzer II

message: HP and PS are virtually identical and the terms are used interchangeably.  Why are German units (obsolete terms at that) used to decribe an engines power output?  Would it not make more sense to use modern measures that the average reader can understand?  See: Metric horsepower for a discussion of the difference.16:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The engine had 140 PS or 138 hp, not 140 hp. It gets even worse with higher output engines like in aircraft. Articles about historical items should always use the specified term but feel free to add a  template if it does a proper calculation from PS into hp and kW. BTW it's not uncommon for older german books about tanks/aircraft of WW2 to be translations of english books which used an improper PS->hp conversion, with a correct hp->PS conversion in the german books you got some odd PS ratings for these engines. --Denniss (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: PS vs HP

message: Heinrich Rictenberg Stuhler (talk) 20:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add measurements for Americans. (English Metric System) 

message: * Oppose What advantage does splitting the article give?
: There is a stronger argument for splitting off the SPGs (although there is no content sufficient to justify this). Splitting off though the tank variants, as was done here, simply makes the main article unreadable. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split to [[Panzer II variants]]?
Talk:Deep Purple (song)

message: * I've seperated this from the Deep Purple band article, since they shouldn't have been stuck together like that, since most disambiguities aren't.  Firenexx 01:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bronson's claim that the flip of "Deep Purple" holds the distinction of being the longest title of the flip of a Billboard Hot 100 #1 record is false.  "17 Days (the rain will come down, then U will have 2 choose.  If U believe, look 2 the dawn and U shall never lose.)", the flip of Prince's Hot 100 #1 hit "When Doves Cry", is 85 letters long, besting the Nino Tempo and April Stevens flip by 19 letters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.143.39 (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest title of a flip of Hot 100 #1 record 

message: There is also a version from Liberace, but I have no further information about it. --Kuebi (talk) 10:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberace' Version
Talk:Novosibirsk Metro

message: Metro Bridge over the Ob - largest (longest) metro bridge in the world. 194.226.167.99 (talk) 01:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Metro Bridge

message: *One: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Leninskaya_Line -- Kuban kazak 01:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Line Templates

message: Does the line carry 25,000 passengers daily (as in the infobox) or 250,000 as in the article? —Ynhockey (Talk) 20:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Udyogamandal School

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as requested, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article has interesting information, but it's all unrefferenced. Much of the information is only of local interest Adam McCormick 04:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007
Talk:Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem

message: Cite, please!  Note that I don't believe you, but see WP:CITE. TIA---CH 01:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite, please!

message: Is there a reason that the order of names is given as Bruck-Chowla-Ryser?  Most books in design theory call this the Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem, presumably because the important case of projective planes was treated first by Bruck and Ryser, and only later was the theorem extended to all symmetric designs by Chowla and Ryser. Will Orrick (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Theorem name

message: Bruck–Chowla–Ryser theorem →  – The Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem is a generalization of the Bruck–Ryser theorem, which is the reason for the ordering of the names.  I have never seen the ordering "Bruck–Chowla–Ryser" in any authoritative source. Currently Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem redirects to this page.  It has a (very short) edit history. Will Orrick (talk) 17:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Jafeluv (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Ernesto Teodoro Moneta

message: Needs to be wikified.  Isn't his 1907 Nobel Peace Prize notable? ---CH 01:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The claim that Moneta's motto "In varietate unitas" somehow "inspired" the EU motto "In varietate concordia" is not borne out by (or consistent with) the Wikipedia account, and no verification has been found, so I have deleted it. Bjenks (talk) 10:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto claim
Talk:Lady Jane (1986 film)

message: A scholar?! She was sixteen!
:So?!
::Grey was tutored alongside her cousin Edward, the heir apparent and king, and was presumedly as well-educated as he was. MK2 12:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lady Jane was extremely well educated.  She was schooled alongside Prince Edward who had the same tutors as Elizabeth. Danny (talk) 21:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't see why this section is even necessary. i have not seen it on any other historical film. Is there such a section in "Braveheart"? No. Its a film. its understandable they take liberties. Besides, i doubt strongly that Mary would have good relations with any Protestant. if she did, then her actions make no real sense. If you like someone, you don't execute them.
One of the historical inaccuracies you list is that Lady Jane didn't like Guildford Dudley.  
This isn't true.  Jane indeed deeply loved Guilford and wept upon seeing him taken to the scaffold at the Tower of London she cried "Oh Guildford, Guildford!  Oh, the bitterness of death!"
Danny (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: At the beginning of the film, her father says she is "in her sixteenth year" so she is 15 at this point (someone who is 16 would be in their 17th year) 173.87.157.124 (talk) 22:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Danny, writing in 2009, is correct. These things should only be discussed in a 'reception' section if third-party reliable sources has made an issue of them. Otherwise it violates WP:NOR. The JPStalk to me 10:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical inaccuracy needs correcting 

message: The summary, presumably following the movie presentation, says she was betrayed by the council  "because of her designs for reforming the country."   I don't know any history book that interprets it this way.  The council betrayed her because  Mary Tudor was winning and they wanted to be on the winning side before they compromised themselves too much.  Making Jane a "reformer" seems to be a movie addition to make her sympathetic to modern audiences. Basically she was a pawn in the vicious religious wars of the period.  2001:558:6011:1:7CEE:93EE:AA2B:D816 (talk) 03:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   More inaccuracies
Talk:Cro (TV series)

message: Do ANY of the Wikipedians have ANY program or way to put up a picture from "Cro"? There are some images on websites.
: No, it's likely not a case of lazyiness, but a case of complying with Wikipedia's stricter compliance to fair use laws.  --  Zanimum 15:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everyone's Lazy! 

message: Just today, I discovered in the TV info box that the TV-MA rating. "Cro" is a kids' cartoon and had a TV-Y rating on Noggin. --68.37.116.234 12:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV-MA? 

message: On the German website of Amazon.com, it has this page with a Cro video. It's obviously a bootleg copy, seeing how Phil sort of looks slightly different. --68.37.116.234 22:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Bootleg 

message: On this link, a picture of the Cro opening and closing sequences is seen. The closing credits picture has credits written in a font. Does anybody know what that font is? --68.37.116.234 21:12, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Font 

message: I found this in external links:
* CRO is a Clinical Research Organization in clinical trial
It doesn't belong there. It should be on CRO. --69.253.15.246 12:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted thing 

message: Has it been brought out on DVD yet?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.12.165.254 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD?

message: Reference Number 1 has inappropriate language in it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.237.79.129 (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Reference 
Talk:FG

message: As a part of the MoS cleanup I rem. the following dicdefs:
* "full group", in MMORPG parlance
* "foreground" function command for the Bash Unix shell
Wikiepdia is not a dictionary--Commander Keane 01:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Bethan wilkinson is now 12 how played Sharh loveson on corrienation street. she was 3 when she first come on corrugation street  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.11.123 (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bethan Wilkinson
Talk:Wang Sichao

message: As of this recent revision, I see only two sources used here (and another about Hawking).  The last significant changes  that also removed a few sources.  There was an AfD in 2005 but that was a long time ago.  The article basically contains two pieces of information: that Sichao had an opinion about Pluto (every astronomer did), then opinions about UFOs.  No other basic BLP coverage.  I understand that it may be harder to find reliable English sources about a Chinese person, but all this makes me wonder if another AfD is a good idea.  —PaleoNeonate – 20:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: the article was rewritten since, thank you very much, —PaleoNeonate – 11:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Paul Delaroche

message: Um, this article seems biased. And it doesn't make total sense. The reviewer seems to call "Le Jeune Martyr" pathetic, which is insane. I can't believe that this is what he/she meant.
I'm going to have to agree with the other comment, that's exactly why I originally clicked Discussion.
: The article looks like it's primarily taken from the text of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, and hasn't been updated. A lot can change in 95 years, including the standards for encyclopedia articles. studerby 21:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Article fails to mention that Charles Gleyre took over his studio in 1843 after his death. Viriditas (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Location suspected to be rue de Vaugirard. Viriditas (talk) 23:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Gleyre 

message: So ... 11 sources have been used for 5 references? Ooookay. Wayne 10:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange numbers
Talk:Southlake, Texas

message: I am fairly confident that someone is intentionally giving incorrect state championship years. Since starting in 5A play, the Dragons have won the championship in 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2006. I have seen it changed to include 2003 several times. I think someone might be changing it to further boost the Dragons' image, or to take away from the team that beat them for state in 2003.
It's a conspiracy!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.49.236.114 (talk) 22:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Championship Years 

message: You would think this is a Real Estate pitch to keep a certain elitist tilt on Southlake.
How many times does the word "affluent" appear?
Whats with so many different housing styles?
This is a disingenuous article with absolutely no credibility.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.245.49.13 (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats with all the Real Estate pictures?
Talk:Hugh McDuck

message: Seafoam McDuck appeared in a flashback sequence in the DuckTales episode "Down & Out in Duckburg". The character, sans gold dentures, was tricked by one Diddle O'Way (believed to be the voice of Aron Kincaid) into signing a contract in which Diddle would acquire everything Seafoam owned if the failed in shipping a barrel of marbles across a treacherous area known as The Cape of No Hope. Naturally, the ship encountered a hurricane and sank, and all that Seafoam had left was his gold watch. Although according to the contract, the watch was Diddle's, Seafoam refused to give it up and escaped. Centuries later, Scrooge McDuck (voiced by Alan Young) would inherit the watch and sell it to buy a stake at the Klondike, where he made his fortune. Naturally, a descendent of Diddle O'Way, Fritter O'Way (definitely voiced by Kincaid) demanded Scrooge pay his ancestor's debt. Anyway, if anyone has seen this episode, would you happen to know who voices Seaform McDuck? I know it isn't Alan Young; based on the voice talent credits at the end of the show, the only possibilities are Steve Bulen, Philip Clarke, Rob Paulsen (doesn't really sound like him), and Chuck McCann (doesn't sound like him, either). So, yeah... if you know or find out, put it here or in the article, would ya? :) --172.148.9.115 01:51, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, here are the voices I do have: Steve Bulen (character(s) unknown), Philip Clarke (character(s) unknown), Joan Gerber (Mrs. Bentina Beakley, Salvation Mary), Aron Kincaid (Fritter O'Way, possibly Diddle O'Way), Chuck McCann (Duckworth the Butler, Delivery man), Rob Paulsen (Robin Lurch, Worker), Russi Taylor (Huey, Dewey and Louie, Webbigail Vanderquack), Alan Young (Scrooge McDuck). Character I don't have voices for yet are: Mr. O'Flannel, the clothes shop worker; Captain Jack, the fishing boat captain; Seafoam McDuck; the waiter of Quack Mason; and a radio announcer. Hope that helps. --172.148.9.115 02:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody? Hmmm.... --172.173.104.111 21:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)