Talk:History of the Italian Republic

message: What on earth is "Rampantism". It's not an English word.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob625 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rampantism?

message: ..can you say "conspiracy theory"? That the Ordine Nuovo attacks were perpetrated by neofascists who tried to pin them to the communist party, does not make this a covert CIA operation. Until you present some proof to the opposite (not including the 30-year old Soviet forgery of the non-existant "supplement B" to the Field Manual 30-31), allegations about Gladio connections with Ordine Nuovo are just hot air. 193.92.81.11 00:51, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to Wikipedia:NPOV dispute: "Then, under this new section, clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does not seem to have a NPOV and why. Make some suggestions as to how one can improve the article. Be active and bold in improving the article." The US State disclaimer you have put totally admits on the existence of Gladio, it only denies two assassinations in Greece and a military manual. Now, I'm sure you will understand why the US State Dept is not exactly the most neutral source for this kind of stuff. I advise you to read or find someone to translate you this  Repubblica article which back-up claims in this article. It is a well known historical fact, proven by investigation by judge Felice Casson and others, that Gladio has engaged in false flag attacks in Italy. I don't know exactly what you mean by a "conspiracy theory", because I don't think that Italian victims of the Piazza Fontana bombing or the 1980 Bologna massacre think it's "just a theory". The Repubblica link that is provided here and in the main-text of the article also give links to the Italian Commission on Terrorism report and the original juridical sentences. You may also consulte these documents. CQFD. Tazmaniacs 14:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to "Gladio"

message: From this page, it seems that most of the history of the Italian Republic was a conspiracy. While I agree that there are still a lot of unsolved episodes and mysteries, this is totally unbalanced as well as, frankly, ridiculous and unworthy of wikipedia.Giordaano 13:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds more like a PCI history of the Italian Republic. Historical compromise? This was an issue that was very important to the PCI itself (which was actually factionalized on this issue; not necessarily a bad thing), not to the history of the Italian Republic. Intangible2.0 23:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the entire article warrants the WP:NPOV tag that I have placed above it because it should deal with the history of the entire nation of Italy after 1945 and not just almost exclusively with political violence (eg it mentiones Italy's membership of the EU, of which it is a founding member, only in passing). Wikimam 02:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conspiracy theories

message: Quote The 1948 general election was influenced by the United States as part of their ongoing effort to fight communism ... The PCI itself was accused of being funded by Moscow and the Cominform
Without quoting any sources this article states that the US influenced the 1948 Italian elections and that the CIA accused the PCI of being funded by Moscow. I am not knowledgeable enough about postwar Italy but this piece about the Marshall plan and many other sources say that the PCI was funded by Stalin to the tune of some 10 million US$ a month - in its rendering and omission this article is clearly not NPOV 
"No Communist party outside the Soviet bloc depended more on Soviet funding over the years than the PCI did." Riva, Valerio. Oro da Mosca: i finanziamenti sovietici al PCI dalla Rivoluzione d'ottobre al crollo dell'URSS.
The same lack of NPOV is evident in related articles such as the one about Palmiro_Togliatti
Wikimam 03:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased POV in 1948 elections

message: OK, I will repeat it: this page is ridiculous. 60 years of Italian history seem to consist only of someone's pet theories about Gladio. No economy, no culture, no social developments. Conspiracies, secret agents, false flag attacks. The page, as it is, is hopeless.
It would be better to delete it, and open a special chapter under "conspiracies".Giordaano 11:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This page is ridiculous

message: Why wasn't Italy subjected to Allied occupation after the war? Brutannica (talk) 03:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Postwar occupation

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Grabage in Pozzuoli 2008.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: That single short sentence describing that "There is a now a Technocracy in charge" or whatever is insufficient.  Can someone with knowledge of the details fill in the huge blanks?  Like, when is the "Republic" going to hold elections again?  Chadlupkes (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  latest history events 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the Italian Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041113092318/http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/it00000_.html to http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/it00000_.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure)  Turnagra (talk) 09:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: History of the Italian Republic →  – I think this is a better format for this article. Interstellarity (talk) 00:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

text: *  We have plenty of other articles that use this format. See History of Canada (1982–present) and History of Russia (1991–present) as well as this discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * But why should this article's title be changed? That is still not an argument for why this article should be renamed. In what way is the proposed title better than the current title? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 December 2021 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion