Talk:Protestantism in China

message: Instantnood, thanks for keepoing a keen eye. Today, though, without actually looking at the page history, I added the Religion in PRC category...the article incorporates both religion in China and religion in PRC scope, so I think both are appropriate. Dpr 19:33, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: This study explains that high numbers are based on 1980s false statistics. The recent survey by Werner Burklin disputes the alleged "official" figure (no proof to confirm officiality).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.180.11.90 (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  False figure: 110 million 

message: Same problems of the article Christianity in China. An old figure (January 2007), recently denied by documented surveys, is used as the only source. --Esimal (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've NPOVised the introduction, highlighting the latest studies and surveys and the problem of false statistics examined by Tony Lambert. --Xi Zhu (talk) 10:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

text: see:Talk:Christianity in China for my response to the last edits to this article. There is an additional problem in retaining the graphic that I created, in that it is not neutral or representative of all of the claims that both Xi Zhu and I are asserting.Brian0324 (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-added POV tags, this article has the same problems highlightened here. --Xi Zhu (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2007 POV 

message: Needs to use more of the sources from further reading, and use appropriate citations with pages. Few cites for its assertions; too much reliance on dated sources and primary quotes. Too POV.Parkwells (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and citations

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Protestantism in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303184353/http://www.china-zentrum.de/fileadmin/redaktion/RCTC_2012-3.29-54_Wenzel-Teuber_Statistical_Overview_2011.pdf to http://www.china-zentrum.de/fileadmin/redaktion/RCTC_2012-3.29-54_Wenzel-Teuber_Statistical_Overview_2011.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified