lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Unkle

message: just wondering:
unkle - the time has come - 1996
Yes, The Time has Come is the first and the greatest UNKLE album to date, many fans dont like the new commercial style. Yet others prefer the new style. 
also there is no mentioning of [unklesound|unkle sounds]
unkle_-_unklesounds_-_edit_music_for_a_film_-_2004
unkle_-_unklesounds_-_where_the_wild_things_are_-_2004
unkle_-_unklesounds_-_wwiii_unkle_vs_unkle_-_2cd_-_2004
(lazy bugger)
Yes I 2nd this! Why is there no mention of "The time has come"?
https://www.discogs.com/release/22077-UNKLE-The-Time-Has-Come-EP
(pengopen)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.6.40 (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Could someone familiar with the topic please take a stab at rewriting the intro?  You have to read to the third sentence before you find out that this article is about a music group. The style in general assumes too much knowledge of hip hop. This would be acceptable in a music magazine, but this is an encyclopedia.  I would do it myself if I knew more about the group's sound and bio.  Thanks to anyone willing to give it a go.--Hraefen Talk 17:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro needs a rewrite

message: UNKLE have created a 'modern reworking' of Beethoven's 9th Symphony for the new UK BMW advert. 
* Advert: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSl6KIZAsNI
* Source: http://www.brandrepublic.co.uk/sectors/advertising/creative/advertisement/34318/bmw-see-feels-wcrs/
However I don't know enough about the track to warrant myself adding it to the page.
Jonathan 20:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Remix 

message: You get the picture. Anyone interested, post here or just edit. NoxAvian (talk) 01:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Editing Process 

message: cell 5-8 was missing a right border, so have fixed this. -- RND  T  C  23:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected Album table frame error
Talk:Prime 5

message: seems like it couldve never really come out
please explain--Readytodie 00:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  has the band confirmed this 
Talk:Production orientation

message: how does the production orientation affect the rapidly expanding number of the exchanges and transaction between buyers and sellers?
:There are fewer and fewer companies that use this approach. Increases in volume should not affect the a companies core philosophical outlook, but it could. I don't see how an increase in a societies amount of transactions would effect a companies core principles either. mydogategodshat 16:41, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:University of London Institute in Paris

message: #Timrollpickering 00:29, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Supported

message: (I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 00:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University ratings

message: The way in which the English-teaching staff has been made redundant is highly dubious (the instigators of the redundancy plan have consistently compared Ulip to the Wall Street Institute!!) and management has been unable to convince both the comité d'entreprise and the auditors appointed to inspect the financial situation that there are valid reasons for making so many staff redundant.
The newly-created structure is designed solely for the benefit of a handful of British students learning French and is unlikely to provide a good environment for these students, as the uniquely bilingual and bicultural nature of the Institute has been wilfully destroyed and in effect created what a senior member of staff has referred to as a 'ghetto'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by UoL Monitoring Group (talk • contribs) 20:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The paragraphs that seem to cause so much upset 

message: ULIP has updated its logo. Please could the new logo replace the one currently displayed on this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.109.60.11 (talk) 14:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Logo  

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect University of London Institute in Paris Students' Union. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of London Institute in Paris Students' Union listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Heworth, York

message: Does anyone know where the former workhouse that is now a hospital is referring to?  I'm not familiar with it.
: I haven't heard of it either, and a quick Google doesn't come up with much. I've moved it here for now:
:: "The former workhouse is now a hospital."
: — Matt 22:41, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, after a bit more Googling, I came up with , which lists Heworth as a Conservation Area. The former workhouse-turned hospital  mentioned is a "St Mary's Hospital, Huntingdon Road (on the boundary of the Conservation Area) is by J. B and W. Atkinson. It was built in 1948 as a large and very plain workhouse". The only hospital on Huntingdon Rd on my map is "White Cross Road Hospital". Neither are mentioned in Appleton's local history. — Matt 23:15, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: No, I think Matt has the right building.  According to "The History of York" (2001) by the late Patrick Nuttgens and others (pp 268-9), the original workhouse was in Marygate.  In 1849 (not 1948 - a bit late for building workhouses!) a new workhouse, housing three hundred, was opened "outside the city in Huntington Road".  Like a lot of workhouses, it was eventually turned into a hopsital (i.e. St Mary's, above).  At some point in the 1980s or 90s it became "The Grange" and was sold to what is now York St John University.  If you walk out of town up Huntington Road, it's on the left, 5-10 minutes from Monk Bridge, after the Victorian houses on both sides come to an end and the Foss comes in on your right, before the old railway overbridge which is now a cycle-track.  You can't miss it!  Whether that side of the Foss was part of Heworth I have no idea (and Matt's PDF link above doesn't work).  Hope this helps.  --GuillaumeTell 10:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Haleys Terrace, ah, where I used to swim in the 50-yard swimming-pool.  I'll look for the fever hospital when next in the area. --GuillaumeTell 00:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Workhouse
Talk:Ingvar Kamprad

message: Currently the final paragraph of Section #3 Net worth and Stichting INGKA Foundation is as follows:
 
In March 2010, Forbes magazine estimated Kamprad's fortune at US$23 billion, making him the eleventh richest person in the world. A year later, he fell to 162nd after his lawyers produced documents proving that the foundation he established and heads in Liechtenstein owns IKEA, and that its bylaws bar him and his family from benefiting from its funds. In June 2015, Kamprad was listed as the eighth wealthiest person in the world in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, with an estimated net worth of $58.7 billion. Forbes reported Kamprad's net worth as of March 2015 to be $3.5 billion.
The Forbes 2010 article doesn't appear to be online and the Bloomberg Billionaires Index no longer mentions Kamprad. The text needs editing and/or new citations found. 
I deleted the external links Ikea's enigmatic founder's amazing and controversial life by Daniel Coughlin at https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/ikeas-enigmatic-founders-amazing-and-controversial-life/ss-BBOJ4fY?ocid=spartanntp and Profile at Bloomberg Billionaires Index at https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/profile/ingvar-kamprad since they no longer lead to the relevant pages. Mcljlm (talk) 01:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

message: It’s interesting that the chapter on his career is actually shorter than the chapter on his brief Fascist involvement… Wikipedia in a nutshell 193.234.100.136 (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career vs Fascist involvement
Talk:Mount Hopkins (New Zealand)

message: Why "Mount Hopkins (New Zealand)" and not "Mount Hopkins, New Zealand"? Mount Hopkins isn't a type of New Zealand, it's a place! User:Grutness 2004
:See WP:NCNZ; it's an unpopulated place, hence disambiguation uses parentheses. Schwede66 07:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Le Ton beau de Marot

message: Random question: Even though Hofstadter has been clearly influenced by W. V. O. Quine in many of his previous works (and coined the word quine to refer to a self-describing computer program), and even though Quine writes extensively on the subject of language and translation, Hofstadter does not cite Quine at all in Le Ton beau de Marot, which is chiefly concerned with translation. Does anyone know why he doesn't? —FOo 21:51, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose his rambings didn't happen to veer that way. Chameleon 21:56, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:2,5-Dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine

message: I chopped the following, because it is unsourced and attempts to give advice to potential users. WP shouldn't be giving advice, and any advice that WP quotes needs to be sourced. This is doubly true of medical/safety advice.
:Upon tasting the chemical, if one notices a highly bitter or "chemically" taste, this should serve as a warning sign that the drug is not LSD, but likely a psychedelic amphetamine (DOC, DOB or DOI). Although it must be noted that the absence of a bitter taste does not necessarily mean the blotter contains LSD, detecting other blotter substrate drugs like 5-MeO-AMT or Bromo-DragonFLY, by taste, has not yet been reported.  An active dose of LSD (~100 μg) is so small that it has virtually no perceivable taste. 
Ashmoo (talk) 12:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced advice 

message: The picture of structure is wrong.  The picture implies a particular chirality that compound does not have. It needs to be depicted as the racemate!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.204.73.226 (talk • contribs) 17 February 2011‎
:Hopefully I just addressed that. Catclock (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I second what the above poster says, this structure seems to indicate 3,6 and NOT 2,5 96.245.14.58 (talk) 07:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The chemical names 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine and 3,6-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine indicate exactly the same structure.  Each involves counting around the ring in the opposite direction of the other.  The direction that gives the lower numbering (2,5- in this case) is chosen as the proper numbering.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical structure
Talk:The Tale of Genji (manga)

message: The External link is for a URL (www.thecasualspectator.net) that was lost or abandoned by its original owner. I've copied the link here just for archival purposes, and perhaps someone might track down another article on the same manga. gK 22:37, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: a) Given the title's words in the Iroha are usually rendered with spaces, Asaki yume mishi, is there a particular reason this isn't being followed in the romaji title?
b) Can we get a literal translation in the Lead? From translations about the 'net, I gather it's something about "shallow dreams," but the exact grammar without context escapes me. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title questions
Talk:Bhikhu Parekh

message: moved to Bhikhu Parekh. The person is almost exclusively known by his personal name. --rgpk (comment) 21:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - Known for being an academic and not as a peer. Also no disambiguation is required for this article title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Speedy close. Wait for one RM to be closed before opening another. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Strike speedy close, now that prev discussion is closed. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 
Talk:A Game at Chess

message: I linked the words "Queen's Gambit Declined" directly to the "Queen's Gambit" category in the "Chess openings" article. Should the words "Queen's Gambit Declined" be in quotation marks or italicized?)
--NoPetrol 23:16, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  It shouldn't be either, should it? Capitalization ought to be enough. The Singing Badger 01:42, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I deleted the detailed cast list because it was a wholesale plagiarism of the wording in the Oxford Complete Works. A second problem is that the names given to the characters in the Complete Works are different to those in all other editions (e.g. the "White Knight" becomes "White Knight Charles" in the Oxford). The Oxford names are designed to make the play easier to read, but it's better to avoid them in this article since they're unusual and could cause confusion.Downstage right (talk) 02:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast list

message: Students from the English course "Shakespeare and His Contemporaries" at the University of Maryland, College Park will be working on improvements to this page between April 18, 2019 and May 1, 2019. We would love to have feedback and assistance from experienced Wikipedians. Thank you!
CollierJP (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This notice on the talk page should suffice to let other editors know that your students will be working on the page. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational project
Category talk:Composers by nationality

message: (From Wikipedia:Categories for deletion - Aranel ("Sarah") 00:01, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: * (0) :Category:Composers_by_nationality -> Obsolete; now also sorted by genre, e.g. :Category:Classical composers by nationality -- Beland 05:20, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Tinian

message: See discussion in Talk:Battle of Guam about problems with the image using the classic skin.  I've added a floatright table to fix the problem, but please let me know if you object, or there is an approved format or something. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:20, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Island hopping did not bypass islands of no threat, with negligible forces. Rabaul was a strongpoint, but it was bypassed. It was also left as a sort of training ground for new pilots, to give them early battle experience. Other islands that were bypassed were a threat until Japanese shipping took losses from US submarines, at which point none of the bypassed islands were a threat, in a sense. Binksternet (talk) 15:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The section can be improved. The strategy seems actually to have involved concentrating "on strategically important islands that were not well defended".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 15:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island hopping 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Map of the Battle of Tinian (1944).svg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 24, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-07-24. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Map of the Battle of Tinian (1944).svg]]

message: This article uses the word interred when I suspect it should be interned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.95.56 (talk) 09:05, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interred or interned?
Category talk:Airports in Brunei

message: (Discussion from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion - Aranel ("Sarah") 00:07, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Brunei only has 2 airports, so only 2 things will ever be in this category, and only one has an article anyway. Do we really need a category for 2 items? Luigi30 13:21, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Airports of Brunei]]
Talk:Global War

message: The country currently known as the United Kingdom has gone by a large number of different terms over the years.  Could someone please make sure the right one is used for each war? --Carnildo 03:40, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Britain vs United Kingdom vs British Empire vs...

message: Could someone check and see what I did to cause the numbers by the various topics to vanish. All I did was change a country name in about 3 spots and include an explaination in world war 1. Thanks.
:Many people have topic auto-numbering set in their preferences under "Misc. settings".  I removed your manual numbering a few edits ago because the double-numbering that results looks odd. --Carnildo 22:27, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers??
Talk:M1911 pistol

message: A noteable feature of this pistol is that it has no magazine safety. Most pistols will not fire if the magazine is removed. The M1911 will fire. You can remove the magazine, but if there is a round in the chamber, the weapon will fire. This has surprised several people over the years; I know of several accidents and near-accidents that occurred because someone was screwing around and ‘didn’t know it was loaded’, thinking they had unloaded it by removing the magazine.
Looking at the illustration in this article captioned ‘A basic version of Smith & Wesson's SW1911 with user-installed Pachmayr grips.’, I see the manufacturer has stamped a warning about this on the barrel. Putting in a magazine safety would seem a better idea, but maybe the design will not allow that modification?
Some discussion of this could improve the article, maybe even warn someone who does not know. Also, has any version of an M1911 ever been made that has a magazine safety? 2A00:23C7:E284:CF00:54D6:2A36:5AF1:B439 (talk) 14:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely sure what you mean by a magazine safety, but I do know that the 1911 is a closed bolt gun. Meaning, it puts round in the chamber, but does not fire it until the trigger is pulled. This means there is no way to unload the gun completely just by removing the magazine. But if you want to be safe, pull back the slide all the way to eject anything that is still in there. This is a general rule for those who use closed bolt guns.Blamazon (talk) 20:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Also if you aren't smart enough or trained enough to know you have a round in the chamber even though the mag is removed, then you shouldn't be holding a gun. The saying "treat every gun like it's loaded until you're 100% sure it's not" should not be ignored because it will consistency save your life and the lives of others. Don't screw around when it comes to gun safety.Blamazon (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Magazine Safety

message: “Language cautioning against pulling the trigger with the second finger was included”. This is not clear to a lay person. What does it mean? (I.e., how could you pull the trigger with your second finger? Mithalwulf (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't imagine how, either, but it's apparently not only possible, it was done frequently enough to need a warning.  Picture holding the weapon in your firing hand. Insert your middle (longest) finger into the trigger guard and onto the trigger.  Then imagine what happens when the slide recoils....  67.225.123.161 (talk) 20:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Finger mention 

message: No mention of long barrel versions and related US competition target shooting use? https://www.guns.com/news/2013/11/05/size-matters-six-longslide-1911s 64.121.176.58 (talk) 05:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long barrel version and use in shooting competition 

message: That 1938 price seemse very misleading.  I've seen mention of Colt contract prices for the Army in the early days of $14.50.  67.225.123.161 (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priced out of the market?
Talk:Georgia Tech

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved.  Favonian (talk) 12:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Georgia Tech →  – The Georgia Institute of Technology is the school's official name used in the vast majority of cases. It should be noted that Georgia Tech is only a common abbreviation for the full name of the school, and does not constitute WP:COMMONNAME situation in the Wikipedia Community Guidelines.
The precedent that can be referred to includes the common abbreviation of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is MIT, but the entry is still the original name. The common abbreviation for The California Institute of Technology is Caltech, but the entry is still the original name. The University of California, Berkeley is often abbreviated as UC Berkeley, but the entry is still the original name.
In the 2019 discussion, some contributors mentioned "Virginia Tech" as a precedent. First, "Virginia Tech" is a rare case of article title usage among U.S. university and college Wikipedia entries. Second, the use of the name "Virginia Tech" is a different case: its original name is too long and contains "and", and is hardly used in general. If you were to ask passers-by on the street in the United States if they knew about the "Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University," they'd probably be confused. But if you mention "Virginia Tech," it will be more likely that they say "oh, I know it." This is where Wikipedia's COMMONNAME guidelines apply. I don't believe it would be appropriate to refer to Virginia Tech and Georgia Tech as precedent here. Cfls (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My point made above is that there is no clear practice concerning popular names for educational institutions, and that there appears to be a sentiment here that "Foo Tech" is obvious common usage, but "Foo State" isn't. I'm not sure why we're drawing the distinction. Acroterion (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose per Rreagan007. Estar8806 (talk) 02:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose Georgia Tech is the common name and is used for academics as much as sports. Many university entries use abbreviated names (London School of Economics, Sciences Po, University at Buffalo, Virginia Tech, Stanford University). BojackSanchez12 (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 February 2023 

message: This article was first promoted to GA status in 2007, and reassessed in 2009 but since then seems to have slipped. While the prose is fine, the main issue is missing citations. The traditions section has had a refimprove tag since 2010, but more are needed elsewhere. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article criteria