Talk:Hamtramck, Michigan

message: As of the 2000 Census, major ancestry groups reported by Hamtramck residents include:
· Polish - 26% · Black or African American - 15% · Yugoslavian - 12% · Arab - 11% · Asian Indian - 7% · Arab/Arabic - 6% · Bangladeshi - 10% · Ukrainian - 4% · German - 3% · Albanian - 3% · Other Arab - 3% · Irish - 2% · Italian - 2% · Russian - 2% · English - 1% · French (except Basque) - 1% · Lebanese - 1% · Pakistani - 1% · Scottish - 1% · Macedonian - 1% · Mexican - 1% · Iraqi - 1%''
This list treats "Arab," "Arab/Arabic" and "Other Arab" as three separates.  Can I assume that this is a mistake?  I'm guessing that the first "Arab" listing, which is at 11%, actually is supposed to include the other two.  I don't know that for a fact, though. 68.40.64.186 04:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arab percentage 

message: "largest of its kind in the world"??  some joker wrote that, right?  i mean, sxsw hasn't always been such a corporate affair, but surely that's a ridiculous statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.15.244 (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  blowout 

message: It's Fat Tuesday, not Fat Thursday. It's the day before Ash Wednesday. 97.130.162.222 (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paczki Day 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hamtramck, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140817130151/http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130615/METRO01/306150049 to http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130615/METRO01/306150049
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:51, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *http://www.hamtramck.us/services/documents/zoning-map.pdf
*http://www.hamtramck.us/services/documents/zoning-map-appendix.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoning maps 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Hamtramck, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://metrotimes.com/blowout/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Hamtramck, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fpopest%2Fdata%2Fcities%2Ftotals%2F2012%2FSUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fgeo%2Fwww%2Fgazetteer%2Ffiles%2FGaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315214103/http://www.hamtramck.us/events/pages/paczki.php to http://www.hamtramck.us/events/pages/paczki.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315214103/http://www.hamtramck.us/events/pages/paczki.php to http://www.hamtramck.us/events/pages/paczki.php
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Hamtramck, Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hamtramck.us/about/pages/index.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://hamtramckmusicfestival.com/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kowality.com/story.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109050601/http://www.cus.wayne.edu/content/publications/Asians7.pdf to http://www.cus.wayne.edu/content/publications/Asians7.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109050601/http://www.cus.wayne.edu/content/publications/Asians7.pdf to http://www.cus.wayne.edu/content/publications/Asians7.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109050601/http://www.cus.wayne.edu/content/publications/Asians7.pdf to http://www.cus.wayne.edu/content/publications/Asians7.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140107011147/http://m.therepublic.com/view/story/5933b2bcc1814feba18b7ced1e51c317/MI--Yemeni-Mural to http://m.therepublic.com/view/story/5933b2bcc1814feba18b7ced1e51c317/MI--Yemeni-Mural
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121029041511/http://www.co.wayne.mi.us/sheriff_jail.htm to http://www.co.wayne.mi.us/sheriff_jail.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stflorianparish.org/calendar_en.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hamtramck.us/about/pages/history.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720184232/http://www.michigansportshof.org/inductees/archive.html to http://www.michigansportshof.org/inductees/archive.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mhsteca.org/86.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120724095659/http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1005366/index.htm to http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1005366/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: John from Idegon reverted my change, claiming there needs to be a new source, even though the change that I made was to bring the phrasing in line with the source material. The previous phrasing, , implies that 
* A) the amendment to the ordinance "regulates" religious sounds that were previously unregulated and that 
* B) the amendment regulates "religious sounds" in a broad sense, rather than calls to prayer. 
This is incorrect on both counts. The amendment carved out a special exception for calls to prayer, where they were previously indistinguishable from other "noise" by the statute. From the amendment: 
:
As you can also see from the above text, the amendment specifically refers to calls to prayer, and not "all religious sounds". "Religious sounds" that are not related to announcing religious meetings would presumably not be covered by the amendment. My edit changed the sentence to read:  which I believe is what the amendment says. If John from Idegon or anyone else has any objection to the change, I'd love to hear your reasoning. If you happen to have some kind of case law or other source that supports the previous incorrect wording, I'd love to see that too. AlexEng(TALK) 02:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: What's correct in your view is irrelevant. What the sources say is. All I asked you to do was start a discussion here to gain a consensus for your change.  Which per WP:BRD you should not have reinstated.  I have again reverted it.  All interested parties can discuss it here, and when we reach a consensus, then we can change the article.  I do not see a source for the attitude here.  This is exactly how this is supposed to work. John from Idegon (talk) 02:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: What's correct in your view is equally irrelevant. What you restored is Original Research and not indicative of what's written in the sources cited. If you have a PAG based reason to restore factually incorrect content, I'm all ears. AlexEng(TALK) 03:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content reversion