Talk:Tony Hatch

message: Note: A web search for Hatch's birthdate gives the date 30 June, but sources differ giving the year as 1939 or 1940. Does anyone have clues or info on which date is more likely or has better evidence? Wondering, -- Infrogmation 16:28, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your source for June 30?  I have found three on-line bios, one of which states 1939, but no specific date; the other two, including Hatch's official website, list no birthdate at all.  1939 seems likely, as that would put him at 16 when he left school in 1955. 64.12.117.13 23:37, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  The imdb is one of a number of web sites listing 30 June. I did web searches for ["Tony Hatch" born] and  ["Tony Hatch" birthday], and found various relevent results (along with the not strictly relevent hits, of course). Those that gave a day gave June 30th, but did not all agree on the year. A web search for ["Tony Hatch" 1939] and ["Tony Hatch" 1940] will show some other relevant results. -- Infrogmation 17:55, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: I feel the article needs to be split into different section so it is easier to read. It looks terrible at the moment. - Erebus555 17:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article structure 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: In this edit, material was introduced to this article from . (See, for example, the material on David Bowie.) Other material added by this contributor may also be unusable (see CCI). While the article has been subsequently edited, unfortunately the material was not removed but incorporated into subsequent edits, and it remains an unauthorized derivative of that work. It either needs to be completely rewritten or restored to the version prior to the copyvio. I've blanked the article to give interested contributors an opportunity to determine how best this should be resolved. It will be revisited by an administrator after about a week. If a new version is not presented, restoration to earlier is likely. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Could we just revert now, for readers' sake, and make other changes as appropriate? The Hatch article gets over 1800 hits in a typical month, and Hatch himself hasn't done anything to merit being associated with wrongdoing. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 09:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, certainly. I've restored it to the last clean. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Blessings upon you. Piano non troppo (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: Someone has created a redirect (Push a Little Button) which points here.  But this article fails to mention the song. JonH (talk) 10:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Push a Little Button 

message: Could it go in the article that a television programme once mentioned that when he was on New Faces, he was the Simon Cowell of his day  - another scary person on television? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison with Simon Cowell

message: Why, when I click on hyperlink 'Fred Nightingale' in article Sugar_and_Spice_(The_Searchers_song), I'm redirected to the present article?
At the risk of being obvious:
Put standard Wiki note 'You have been redirected to this article' at the top of the page, stating in that statement the reason for the redirection.
I don't doubt that the reason is legitimate, and perhaps it is made clear in the article below.  But I don't have the patience to pore thru the article empirically to find it.
Cordially,
Jimlue (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection