lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care

message: The article is weak.There's many failures on it:
*This book had many edictions.The first ediction had many differences to the others.
*This book(at least, on  the first edictions) , gave support to freudism and such things.
*The first edictions weren't the best, compared to similar books.
*This book was a failure, in sells, in many parts of the world.German and latin-american translations had poor sells.In the islamic world, it was even, put out of law.In the United States , it was really a big sucess.This book really was a big sucess, but its impact was big only in some english speaking countries:United States and Canada.Agre22 (talk) 01:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The cited source is a letter to the editor that uses the evolution in thinking about whether babies should sleep on their backs or on their tummies to illustrate the dangers of internet health-advice websites. It is not specifically about Spock or his book. No doubt the vaccination schedule Spock gave in 1946 is obsolete, but we're not going to list that as "invalid health information" and warn readers of its "dangers". If anyone's dumb enough to follow a baby-care book from seventy years ago, that's on them. EEng 17:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Weak article

message: The above discussion section for this article is weak. It has many failures:
* It spells "edition" like "ediction" and instead of "sales" it repeatedly says "sells."
* It, uses too many, commas in certain parts.
* Instead of "There are many failures in it," it says "There's many failures on it."
* It is thrilled about the ability to unnecessarily create a bulleted list.
* It is completely wrong. The article never claims anything except sales and number of translations. It does not say that the book changed every region of the world immensely. Each bullet on that delightful bulleted list does not counter anything the article says, but at best points out things not included in the article. Those things weren't included because they're useless (except for the one gem of the section, the claim that it was influenced by Freud, which should be inserted if it can be cited). Chicopac (talk) 16:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done, good sir/ma'am, well done. 207.170.253.223 (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak section of discussion page 

message: this book is important enough for its own article. I am removing the merge tag. Kingturtle (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  do not merge
Talk:The Compleat Enchanter

message: I have a copy in my hand at the moment in really good condition.
I'd like to know if the being a first edition is it worth anything. And would the be ezy to sell. 211.27.219.195 (talk) 01:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First edition of the 1975  compleat enchanter:
Talk:The Complete Compleat Enchanter

message: This is based on an e-book I've seen of the Fantasy Masterworks version, it includes the first two stories and the Wall of Iron novel.  It also has the 'Fletcher and I' essay as a forward.
In that essay is the following paragraph: 
We also wrote two more novellas of the saga, placing Harold first in the world of the Finnish Kalevala (The Wall of Serpents) and then in the world of Irish myth (The Green Magician). After magazine publication, these two stories were combined in a cloth-bound volume, Wall of Serpents. It was not possible to include them in the present volume, first because of considerations of space and second because of contractual complications.
It is hard to find reviews of this specific book on Amazon or Amazon.uk because of their practice of combining reviews for all editions of a book.  I did see one review that mentioned 'The Compleat Enchanter' and its companion book 'The Enchanter Completed' (which contains Wall of Serpents and The Green Magician.)68.97.202.187 (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Fantasy Masterworks version, titled The Compleat Enchanter, does have "The Wall of Serpents" and "The Green Magician" and does not have the "Fletcher and I" essay. The Compleat Enchanter was also the title of the 1975 collection The Compleat Enchanter published by Doubleday, SFBC and Del Rey; that edition was limited to the first three stories and did include "Fletcher and I." Sounds like your e-book is based on the Doubleday edition, not the Fantasy Masterworks one. BPK (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The ebook is titled The Compleat Enchanter - The Magical Misadventures of Harold Shea and the title page does say Fantasy Masterworks Volume 10.  Obviously, I have no clue as to the actual origins of the ebook, but it seems odd that they would use the title page from one book and the contents from a different version.  However, I am assuming your post is based on possession of the actual book, not just an ebook, so that would take precedence.68.97.202.187 (talk) 00:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. There are other de Camp ebooks, mostly from Gollancz's SF Gateway imprint, that are also not what they seem. For example, I've seen an ebook edition of The Tritonian Ring and Other Pusadian Tales that contains ONLY The Tritonian Ring, omitting the "other tales" -- it also misspells Pusadian as "Pasudian." BPK (talk) 04:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Orion Fantasy Masterworks edition does NOT include Wall of Serpents and The Green Magician
Talk:The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows 1946–Present

message: If one examines any copy of any edition of this book, it is clear that "1946–present" is part of its title. It therefore should be part of the title of the article here. Any dissent?
One other point: Cable coverage (including both that addition to the title and I believe entries for channels) began with the 1995 (or was it '94 or '96?) edition, not 2007. I am open to correction for the inclusion of entries on channels and for the exact date. --Tbrittreid (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to include "...1946-Present" in the title because, along with what Tbrittreid said, Ballantine Book's website lists the book with 1946-Present in the title.  Also, I did correct the cable coverage sentence which did start in the sixth (1995) edition. Bhall87 (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Tbrittreid (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title→"...1946–present"
Talk:The Complete History

message: Is there any English translation of this complete histoical work?    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.19.50.29 (talk) 21:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, just English (and French) translations of the parts about the crusades and the Seljuks. Adam Bishop (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: English Translation

message: The texts seem to have been removed from the linked locations for (c) reasons.
Alternatives? Arminden (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Eng. translations: rotten
Talk:Complete Idiot's Guides

message: After having a simple question as to why I I was directed to insert for tildes substantive Page entry on another topic, I decided to do a general Google search for "idiots guide to Wikipedia" (erroneously thinking of the Dummies series.) The 1st item in my search returns was this page. LOLDa5id403 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ha Ha I Searched Google for an Idiot's Guide to Wikipedia and Was Directed Here 

message: After having a simple question as to why I I was directed to insert for tildes substantive Page entry on another topic, I decided to do a general Google search for "idiots guide to Wikipedia" (erroneously thinking of the Dummies series.) The 1st item in my search returns was this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Da5id403 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No tildes test 

message: Since I am signed in under my username with Wikipedia, what does it Wikipedia automatically insert my clickable name with any talk page entries? Da5id403 (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay it, I see the difference, but
Talk:The Complete Manual of Suicide

message: Is there verifiable information that this book was found with bodies of people who committed suicide?
...Because the Japanese criminal code censors only graphical depictions of the sexual organs, this book was not censored by  the    government. Some prefectures designated the book as yugaitosho (book harmful to youth), which restricts the sale of books to minors, while some prefectures, such as Tokyo, decided against doing so. There are many suicides where the book was found along with the body, including several cases of the suicides of junior high school students. The book neither encourages nor discourages suicide, and as well does not tell those considering suicide to seek help, though wordings such as "completely painless" and "marvelous experience" are used to indicate that certain methods are less painful and more fatal than others....
thanks,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by A59303 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  verifiable? 

message: For anyone who will try to solve the question of who the publisher is here is some information I dug up.  says "Publisher: Yurindo", a later book he made that might have been from the same publisher  says "Publisher: Ota Shuppan; Shohan edition (1994)". Also a publishing company called either "Ohta Books" or "Ota Books" may also be the publisher. That's as far as I got. --Koolabsol (talk) 12:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is the publisher? 

message: I'm pretty sure there's a reference to this book in the book Dazai in bungou stray dogs owns- 77.101.241.135 (talk) 07:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osamu Dazai (BSD)
Talk:The Complete Stories (Asimov)

message: Any info on why it was discontinued, and any chances of continuing it. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 01:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Asimov died, and under US copyright law his contract with the publisher expired and wasn't renewed by his estate, who sold the rights to another publisher. Not much chance of it being continued now. Richard75 (talk) 10:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add 

message: Being announced at https://www.kobo.com/ww/en/ebook/the-complete-stories-volume-iii-1 82.36.70.45 (talk) 03:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vol. 3?
Talk:The Corner

message: *http://www.tvdvdreviews.com/corner.html
*http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=57882
*http://www.citypaper.com/film/story.asp?id=4550
*http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,667344,00.html
--Opark 77 15:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential sources

message: how much text can be included without a copyright violation?
In a 2008 interview called “Faking the Hood,” Ishmael Reed – that consummate intellectual maverick who grew up in Buffalo’s former Talbert Mall ...unhappily characterized Simon’s series as “all about black degenerates selling drugs,” etc. That Simon show on HBO, said Reed, was “a piece of crap.” To Reed, what Simon has painted on television is a “Neo-Nazi portrait of black people.”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scranton (talk • contribs) 13:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was in the midst of copyeditng that section until I realized these criticisms are toward the book (not the miniseries) and The Wire. Reed saying "all about black degenerates selling drugs" was said in 1997 before the miniseries came out and the other two quotes are in regard to The Wire. To answer your question, you can't just copy text directly from the source used. Text like  is not appropriate to use. You should also link Ishmael Reed because he has a Wikipedia article and it gives context to why his opinion would be notable to add. But again, none of these quotes/criticisms are directly related to the miniseries The Corner, but other works. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use with attribution
Talk:The Crawling Chaos

message: * I'm really not sure that the phrase "Lovecraft wrote the entire tex[sic], but jackson is credited since the story was based on a dream she experienced." is at all accurate. From what I've read in the past Lovecraft mainly proofread it, however I admit that I'm not 100% sure. Can anyone confirm or deny, or at least add references for that comment?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.5.70.1 (talk) 08:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've placed an "unsourced" template simply because it sounds like an actionable statement that requires a source citation... and not because you are disputing it based on your admittedly faulty and subjective memory of something you might have read somewhere, which is unreliable and unsupported hearsay (which is exactly what you are claiming the disputed statement is). 12.233.147.42 (talk) 01:14, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steve Rowe

message: Article says he was diagnosed in 1997, but this Usenet newsgroup post  is from 1996 and mentions that he had already reached remission by then. 86.164.246.89 (talk) 10:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancer diagnosis - 1996, not 1997? 

message: # Article currently has no in-line reliable sources
# Substantial content, which does not have references, sounds like personal opinions or original research
# The tone of the whole article needs improving to reduce non-neutral point of view
# Other than his work with Mortification/LightForce (earlier name for same band) what is individual claim to notability? Remember notability is not inherited and so his work for Mortification does not him individually notable.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs? OR and NPoV issues
Talk:The Cross and the Switchblade

message: Most of the language on this page appears to have been copied verbatim from Wilkerson's own website?  Anyone have time for a NPoV treatment?  --Patchyreynolds 19:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All from Wilkerson 

message: This needs some serious expansion! I'll try to do it, sometime, but it could be awhile. -SeaSpray17
I will as well :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:245:4300:260:B559:E8A0:8968:132D (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand
Talk:The Custody of the Pumpkin

message: I'm reading Blandings Castle and Elsewhere (Autograph Edition published by Jenkins in 1957) and "The Custody of the Pumpkin" contains the following on p. 23:
I am a firm believer in President Roosevelt and the New Deal. Under the New Deal, the American dog is beginning to eat more biscuits
The article gives initial publication dates for 1924 and that doesn't quite jibe with the New Deal references. Was the New Deal stuff perhaps a later addition to the story? Modal Jig (talk) 18:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found information and incorporated as note. Modal Jig (talk) 17:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating discrepancy
Talk:Alexander Jagiellon

message: While the 18th century painting of Alexander no doubt looks pretty nice, how nice a picture looks should always be secondary to the authenticity and accuracy of a picture. As such, when choosing what picture to use as a portrait in a biographical article on Wikipedia, is it generally best to chose a picture that is dated as close as possible to the time the person lived. The 18th century painting cannot be accurate because it was painted over 200 years after the person in question died. If the painter used a good source for his portrait, then simply use that source as picture for this article. If the painter did not use a source, then the portrait is pure fiction. Omegastar (talk) 17:12, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old engraved portrait versus 18th century portrait painting
Talk:The Dark Wind

message: Any reason that we don't want to start a distinct article for the film? KConWiki (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a separate article for the film, now linked under Adaptations. The infobox for the 1991 film is moved to that article and proper infobox book is set up for the novel. Can someone find the cover image for the novel and include it in the infobox? I do not know how to do that little task. I have not yet read this book, so if someone who has read it can fill in the plot summary, list of characters, reviews, allusions, that would be great.  --Prairieplant (talk) 03:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha I figured out how to add that it needs a cover in the infobox! Took me long enough. --Prairieplant (talk) 13:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Now I have read the book, put up a summary for the novel, list of characters, some reviews of the novel, and allusions to real places and people. I never saw the film, so it would be good if someone who has seen it and also read the book can summarize the differences in plot for the adaptation compared to the novel. Unlike Kirkus Reviews, I was pleased that the suspense and pace were not so intense as the novel before this one. Many were killed by murder, but there is more conversation and introspection to follow the gathering of evidence, up to the crisis, and learn about Hopis along the way.  --Prairieplant (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Film / Book - Two diff articles?
Talk:The Darkness That Comes Before

message: The web address http://www.princeofnothing.com is fairly useless these days. It's basically an advert page. LIARryas (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Marcus Bleasdale

message: The content added is taken with Marcus Bleasdale's consent from http://marcusbleasdale.com/biog
Edward Massey 09:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was the book One Hundred Years of Darkness really recognized as one of the best photojournalism books of the year before it was published? -- Hoary (talk) 09:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book and recognition
Talk:Penguin Cafe Orchestra

message: Redirects to this article which means it is effectively a bio page as well - until someone separates it for any reason......SatuSuro 09:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeffes

message: I believe that the loop at the start isn't a DTMF dial sound.  It's a mixture of an English Engaged Tone (heard at the time if you called a number that was busy although now replaced with a spoken voice loop) and a ringing tone as heard by the person dialing.
Jeffes heard the two together as a result of a fault on his phone line and found the interplay between the two sounds interesting.
Matt.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.185.144.124 (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telephone and Rubber band 

message: I speak Dutch, so I'd rather not edit the text myself. The song "Music for a found harmonium" is also used in the opening credits of a Belgian documentary series called "BelgaSport", which airs on "Canvas" (public broadcast channel).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.83.44.128 (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of "Music for a found harmonium" 
Talk:Chuch of Jesus Christ

message: The "Chuch" of Jesus Christ, hey? Can that be changed in any way now the page has actually been made? --Flicovent
:I've posted merge requests in the appropriate places; once that's done, this page can be deleted. MisfitToys 02:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The misspelling is common enough, that there's really no reason to delete. May as well keep the redirect up, rather than waste resources deleting it. McKay 14:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Deniz Gezmiş

message: According to the Turkish version of this article (which has a reference) and other sites I've seen, his last words were
"Yaşasın tam bağımsız Türkiye. Yaşasın Marksizm-Leninizm'in yüce ideolojisi. Yaşasın Türk ve Kürt halklarının bağımsızlık mücadelesi. Kahrolsun emperyalizm. Yaşasın işçiler, köylüler"
which I translate as
"Long live a fully independent Turkey. Long live the great ideology of Maxism-Leninism. Long live the Turkish and Kurdish peoples' fight for independence. Damn imperialism. Long live the workers, the villagers."
If someone can provide a better translation, please do and fix the article. It seems like the person who changed it is expressing his political views.69.196.133.118 (talk) 04:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Last words

message: As long as I know, phrases such as Üç bizden üç onlardan, Üçe üç isteriz are too famous, but they are nothing but rumor. At least I don't have any reliable sources to prove this. Takabeg (talk) 07:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Demirel

message: In a biography about Deniz Gezmis is written that he is from a Kurdish family from Erzurum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.109.105.28 (talk) 21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was of kurdish descent 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Steamboat (food)

message: So, barring loud opposition, I'm going to go ahead and merge this back into Hot pot.  Speak now or forever hold your peace. Jpatokal (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely merge. They're all in the same family. --Dpr 68.175.44.30 (talk) 01:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:PEDOT:PSS

message: It is stated that Agfa uses the Baytron PEDOT:PSS for coating films in order to make them anti-static. To my knowledge, Agfa produces its own PEDOT:PSS known as Orgacon.
Also, the exponent of 10 in the meters per year is lost.
Peter Kruijt 10:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agfa using Baytron? 

message: Right now the link to "dispersion" is ambiguous. The possible meanings of the word dispersion include optical, electric, materials science and others. I think the correct link should go to the materials science meaning, so I am changing the link. If this is incorrect, just change it to what's right.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by OrganicSolar (talk • contribs) 02:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Dispersion
Talk:Pope Gregory XVII

message: I have been looking at the Fair use policy, and I have some doubts about the use of :Image:GregoryXVII.jpg in this article. Policy no. 8 says 
:The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose.
And no. 9 says:
:it is the policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to allow an unfree image . . . only if it significantly improves the article it is included on. All other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum.
I think it would be easier to make a case for using the image at Clemente Domínguez y Gómez, which is about that particular man than for using it at this article, which just tells the reader that there have been several men claiming the title of Pope Gregory XVII, and links to articles about them.
Any objections if I remove the image? ElinorD 10:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No answer, so I've gone ahead and removed it. ElinorD 21:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use image