Talk:Gagauzia

message: according to , the census data from 2004 shows that the population of comrat was not even close to 70.000 people. Constantzeanu 02:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've mixed up the two events: Upon independence, Romanian was indeed accepted as the state language. Then, an amendment to the Constitution was made in 1994, changing the name to "Moldovan". It was Snegur's attempt to change it back to "Romanian" in 1996, that was rejected as "Romanian Expansionism". See Movement for unification of Romania and Moldova#Independence of Moldova. --Illythr 23:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Dc76\talk 16:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

text: They have a translator office that takes any law, and translates the official version into English, Russian and French. The translator is responsible for the accuracy, literly word by word. The translator is not authorized to deal with "politically correct/incorrect" issues. The "Russian minority" in Gagauzia is 3% of 180,000. Prety small, don't you think? :Dc76\talk 18:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but think at the russian speaking population of the region. Wikipedia doesn't work with "likely" anyway.Anonimu 18:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

message: In the text is written "the right of self-determination". I have put a fact tag there. Unless is provided soon an official document to support this, I will remove the sentence.Sambure talk 05:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For example the link given now as a reference in the article. Also this document of the Venice Comission. --Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 10:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not for example, I asked you official documents, can't you or can you? --Sambure talk 12:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I will remove the sentence if there aren't presented official documents. --Sambure talk 12:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The references we've brought are absolutely legitimate per Wikipedia policies (check WP:RS). Alæxis¿question? 12:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you can't provide official documents. Then it will be removed. Sambure talk 12:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Don't bother to search for one, I already have an official document http://www.prm.md/const.php?page=8350&lang=rom Sambure talk 13:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  How do the 110th and 111th articles of the Moldovan consitution contradict what is written in the article? Alæxis¿question? 13:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked you to provide the source from official documents. You failed. Instead I brought the official document of Moldova which is the constitution. I haven't seen there in any article "the right for self-determination".Sambure talk 13:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wtf? I've brought you a Moldovan law. Isn't it official enough? Alæxis¿question? 13:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Could you first prove that this law is no longer functioning? Alæxis¿question? 13:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Read constitution. (Art.111 în redacţia Legii nr.344-XV din 25.07.2003) Sambure talk 13:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nothing in the 111th article contradicts what is written here. I also have to warn you that you've made 3 reverts. Making one more would be the violation of WP:3RR. Alæxis¿question? 13:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: You were also warned before that without any official sources that line will be removed ASOP. There is a contradiction between the line from Wikipedia and that old one, not to mention is not valid any more.Sambure talk 13:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact tag

message: From constitution of Moldova:
Article 111. Special Autonomy Statutes
(1) The places on the left bank of the Nistru river, as well as certain other places in the south of the
Republic of Moldova may be granted special forms of autonomy according to special statutory
provisions of organic law.
(2) The organic laws establishing special statutes for the places mentioned under paragraph (1) above
may be amended if three fifths of the Parliament members support such amendments.
Now show me where is written in the Constitution that "If Moldova decided to unite with Romania, Gagauzia would have the right of self-determination" this is the line that you kept inserting there.Sambure talk 14:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you've demonstrated that there're no such words in consitution. You still haven't proven that the 1994 law on the status of Gagauzia doesn't work any more. Alæxis¿question? 14:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes, I demonstrated, see below.Sambure talk 14:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: constitution of Moldova

message: The ammendament of the law from 1994 regarding the status of Gagauzia, taken from the official website of Parliament of Moldova:
http://www.parliament.md/download/laws/ro/344-XV-25.07.2003.doc 
3.  Articolul  111 va avea următorul  cuprins:
„Articolul  111. Unitatea teritorială  autonomă  Găgăuzia
(1)  Găgăuzia este o  unitate teritorială  autonomă  cu  un statut special care, fiind o formă  de autodeterminare a găgăuzilor, este parte integrantă şi  inalienabilă  a Republicii  Moldova şi  soluţionează de sine stătător, în limitele competenţei  sale,  potrivit prevederilor Constituţiei  Republicii  Moldova, în interesul  întregii  populaţii, problemele cu  caracter politic, economic şi cultural.
(2)   Pe teritoriul  unităţii  teritoriale autonome Găgăuzia sînt garantate toate drepturile şi libertăţile prevăzute de Constituţia şi  legislaţia Republicii  Moldova.  
(3) În unitatea teritorială autonomă Găgăuzia activează  organe reprezentative şi  executive potrivit legii.
(4) Pămîntul,  subsolul,  apele, regnul  vegetal şi cel  animal,  alte resurse naturale aflate pe teritoriul  unităţii  teritoriale autonome Găgăuzia sînt proprietate a poporului Republicii Moldova şi constituie totodată baza economică a Găgăuziei.
(5) Bugetul unităţii teritoriale autonome Găgăuzia se formează  în conformitate cu  normele stabilite în legea care reglementează  statutul  special  al  Găgăuziei.
(6) Controlul asupra respectării  legislaţiei  Republicii  Moldova în unitatea teritorială  autonomă  Găgăuzia se exercită  de Guvern,  în condiţiile legii.
(7)   Legea organică  care reglementează statutul special al unităţii  teritoriale autonome Găgăuzia poate fi modificată cu votul  a trei cincimi din numărul  deputaţilor aleşi în Parlament.”
PREŞEDINTELE  PARLAMENTULUI 
EUGENIA  OSTAPCIUC 
Chişinău, 25 iulie 2003.
Nr.344-XV.
So, the law from 1994 was ammendated and there isn't any reference for "If Moldova decided to unite with Romania, Gagauzia would have the right of self-determination" this is the line that you kept inserting there.Sambure talk 14:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bonny, is this you? Constitution is one document, the law is another one. You haven't proven that the latter was cancelled or amended. Alæxis¿question? 14:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The ammendament

message: I have protected the page for 48 hours until you guys can discuss your differences here. JodyB talk 14:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Don't worry, he can't bring better and more official documents than the one that I've taken directly from the official website of President of Moldova.Sambure talk 14:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: User Dc76 Talk asked me to comment here on my partial revert on his edit that changed the second level header Administrative divisions into third level header Localities under second level header Geography. I think that the second level header Administrative divisions is more in line with Wikipedia standards. But the name of the header could as well be Municipalities, cities and communes. --Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 08:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I agree! Dc76\talk 21:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrative divisions 

message: So we need the name in English (this is English Wikipedia, after all), also Romanian, as the official language of the state, and Gaugaz, as used by the people themselves. But I see no need to add Ukrainian and Russian. Anyone disagree? Jan1naD (talk • contrib) 14:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian is an official language, along Gagauz and Moldovan/Romanian.Anonimu (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Russian Wiki doesn't mention any other than Gagauz (apart from Russian title itself of course), the situation is similar in Ukrainian Wiki (Ukr + Gagauz). let us stop overwhelming the reader with all different indirectly related tags, templates etc. and give up for some time at least the national pride (or political correctness). The lead should contain the most essential information only. Anyone interested may quickly just check the resp. Wiki edition in the national language to find out, how's the title in that language. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog  (woof!) 17:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe a name section? The lead as it stands now is mostly about the name anyway, and not an overview as the MOS recommends.Anonimu (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in different languages 

message: Is there a info about the gdp per capita in gagauzia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beshogur (talk • contribs) 20:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats about gdp? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gagauzia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211234838/http://www.venice.coe.int:80/docs/2002/CDL-AD(2002)020-e.asp to http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2002/CDL-AD(2002)020-e.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gagauzia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025224219/http://www.peacebuilding.md/library/153/en/Moldova%20Strategic%20Conflict%20Assessment%202006.pdf to http://www.peacebuilding.md/library/153/en/Moldova%20Strategic%20Conflict%20Assessment%202006.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2002/CDL-AD(2002)020-e.asp
*Added  tag to http://www.gagauzi.ru/2009-09-22-17-54-41/65-panorama/75-2009-09-23-00-50-30
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gagauzia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926225334/http://www.cis-legal-reform.org/document.asp?id=2019 to http://www.cis-legal-reform.org/document.asp?id=2019
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Regarding this edit: the source might not be a reliable source on English terminology on Gagauzia. It is written by Norwegian and Polish politicians, and the English translated and copyedited by who knows whom. and by the way, it uses not Gagauz-Yeri, but Gagauzia-Yeri which appears in almost no books. —Michael Z. 22:44, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gagauz(ia)-Yeri 

message: This section begins: "Gagauzia comprises four enclaves". 
An enclave is territory of one state, completely surrounded by territory of another state. On that definition, no part of Gagauzia comprises an "enclave", because Gagauzia is a part of Moldova, the surrounding state.
This section lacks any citations, so I propose to remove it. MrDemeanour (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose removing it. Gagauzia is a part of Moldova, but a distinct part with its own status. The four bits of Gaguzia are separated by non-Gagauzia bits of Molodova. Four enclaves is, thus, perfectly fine as a description. Bondegezou (talk) 11:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography