lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cult of celebrity

message: Fantastic Band
::Cult of Celebrity are a ground breaking rock duo from England who have released 2 albums, Nein (2003) and 0800-Celebrity (2007). Known particularly as a strong LIVE act, the main subject and energy of their music is a reaction to the vacuous celebrity pop culture consuming modern society. 
If this band is notable (and i doubt they are, as a Youtube link does not count as a source of notability) then they should have their own article Cult of Celebrity (band). If this holds up, i will add a link to that page from this one. Rockpocket 18:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: This is an unreferenced and terribly written article. It needs a total re-write, and no, I am not going to do it. If no one take up the challenge then this article should be deleted, as no article would be better than what we have now. As an example, just take a look at this unreferenced opinion presented as a fact: The cult of celebrity is often considered representative of the perceived attitudes towards deliberate apathy, trivia, and dumbing down in popular culture. "Often considered?" By whom? "Perceived attitudes? Whose perception? "Deliberate apathy? Isn't that misnomer? Wcheck (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality
Talk:Argon fluorohydride

message: Sorry about the Aluminum Category thing. I guess I got a bit carried away...Starom 18:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry

message: What is the melting point of this compound? The Nature article Leonid Khriachtchev, Mika Pettersson, Nino Runeberg, Jan Lundell and Markku Räsänen,"A stable argon compound" Nature, 406, 874-876 (2000). DOI: 10.1038/35022551said that infrared absorption of this compound grow by anealing until about 18K. This is different from this article.--Jingxin 02:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Melting point?

message: The article states that HArF is "the only known neutral compound" of Ar. This implies that there are other known compounds, which are not neutral. What are they? I note that this article is the only entry in :Category:Argon compounds. 81.131.195.49 (talk) 23:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ArCF22+ (valence isoelectronic with phosgene). Double sharp (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other compounds of Ar?
Talk:WIN-35428

message: I suppose ß (German esszet) should be β (Greek beta)?
:Yes.  I've corrected it now. Thanks for catching it. --Ed (Edgar181) 18:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel the chemical properties section, though helpful, adds clutter, lack of direction, and repetition to the page. I think some (or all) of the information should be added to the chart on the far right to help conform to the "typical Wiki article". CAS number, molecular formula, IUPAC name, and molecular weight are present in the chart already, leaving SMILES which can go under "Identifiers" in the chart, melting point and optical rotation which both can be put in "Chemical data", however the latter may or may not be important enough to be included. I'm not sure how to edit/add the chart, but if there is no objection, or change I will try myself. This article can be improved a lot more, such as replacing the "Chemical Properties" section with a "Chemistry" section discussing the structure, analogues, etc. that are mentioned under "Uses" which could also be re-titled "Pharmacology", "Medical Research", "Medicinal Use", or something such for the addition of clarity. Just a few thoughts.--Astavats (talk) 10:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I transcluded all the information to the drugbox template and deleted the section (it only took a year to happen from the time of your suggestion. :-P ) Nagelfar (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, done is done. Thank you, I don't know how to use infoboxes well.--Astavats (talk) 02:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. If you go to the template in question, in this example template:drugbox (the template page is always "template:" then the name of the template that is between the  found on the page.) it has instructions for what labels can be added and understood by the template most times. Nagelfar (talk) 04:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks, I'll check it out and practice at a sandbox.--Astavats (talk) 04:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the "Chemical Properties" section necessary?
Talk:Cheryl Dunye

message: Great job with the article, it looks really good and it seems like you found some good sources! As far as improvements go, my first thought is that you might want to give the controversy surrounding The Watermelon Woman its own section, splitting the article into a Film Career section and a Controversy section. I think that would improve the flow a little bit and it would help make the article feel more focused. The only other thing is that you have a further reading section with nothing in it, so maybe lose that?
Great job.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsamadmadmadmadmax (talk • contribs) 05:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: I am a new editor and was trying to add a new citation to this page, but it appears in the text as 10 without appearing in the reference list. I'm not sure what's going on, I would love some input or help in properly structuring the references. 
Emiliepichot (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref List 

message: — Assignment last updated by Vicccshi (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women Filmmakers
Talk:Lorne Spicer

message: Can we please add that I find her extremely sexy? --Elfbadger (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do we really want to know that Lorne Spicer was declared bankrupt? Or to put it more officially in Wikipediese, is this a BLP violation? 62.56.124.189 (talk) 16:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy 
Talk:Teucer

message: There is some commentary (apologies, I don’t have it to hand) to the effect that the portrayal of Teucer in the Iliad does not show him to be particularly heroic, as he hides behind his brother Ajax’s shield, which Ajax moves momentarily aside so Teucer can get off a bowshot, then moves back so Teucer can hide again. This is quite in line with Homer’s general disparagement of archers as fighting in a less « manly » way than spearmen (Pandarus breaks the truce by shooting an arrow at Agamemnon, Paris is essentially an archer rather than a spearman, etc.).  If I can find the commentary, I will post it on the main page. Partnerfrance (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: "Hero" in this context does not mean good or noble. See Greek hero cult. Paul August ☎ 22:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is a very good point: you are right, I should not have used the word "hero" (even someone as reprehensible as Tantalus is a "hero" in the context of Greek mythology).  I was just trying to point out that the discussion in the main article makes it appear that Teucer is portrayed as being as valiant a warrior as other fighters in the Iliad, whereas Homer seems to have a preference for spearmen or swordsmen who fight out in the open and risk their own lives as opposed to fighters using flying weapons from safe cover.  I seem to recall there is another passage where he refers to a group of fighters who use only slingshots to hurl stones from afar, in which he "damns them with faint praise" (I promise to go back to the Iliad to provide sources for all this).Partnerfrance (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Teucer a hero?
Talk:Garret Mountain Reservation

message: *Great Falls (Passaic River)
*Old Great Falls Historic District
*Great Falls of Paterson-Garrett Mountain
*Garret Mountain Reservation
*National Register of Historic Places listings in Passaic County, New Jersey mentions S.U.M. in listing
*Paterson, New Jersey#Lambert Castle Museum
The above articles, whilst focusing on a different aspect of the Falls do cover alot of the same material and do refer to each other. Is it actually necessary? It certainly is confusing and starts getting circuitous. Is there some way they can be consoldated? The distinction between the falls and the mountain are clear, though there may be some jurisdictional differences regarding the what is included in the various municpal, state and national designations. Thoughts?Djflem (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge/consolidate/separate/disambiguate/link/address
Talk:Aa!

message: Any reference stating Miyabi as the new leader? Claneksi (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New leader? 
Talk:Mount Rainier Railroad and Logging Museum

message: "7 miles, roundtrip 14 miles"  -- Really, guys !!!!--174.119.145.37 (talk) 22:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of Railroad
Talk:List of acts of the Parliament of Ireland to 1700

message: Adding move template because capitalisation is wrong. James500 (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I've added a note to the introductory section about short titles.  To keep things simple I've assumed that the Westminster parliament didn't give a short title to any Irish legislation post-1922, but if someone knows better perhaps they can reword what I've said accordingly.  Silverhelm 18:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Short titles

message: I've removed the following from the section for 11 & 12 Geo. 3, as the year stated after the long title doesn't match the year(s) for the session.  Either the year is correct and it was inserted under the wrong session, or the session was correct and the year given is wrong.
*c. 46 An Act for amending an Act made the last Session of Parliament, intitled, An Act for badging such Poor as shall be found unable to support themselves by Labour, and otherwise providing for them, and for restraining such as shall be found able to support themselves by Labour and Industry, from begging (1774)
Silverhelm 19:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertain citation 

message: I have sifted through the various volumes of the Irish statutes freely available on google books at http://alsatia.org.uk/site/2014/02/resource-statutes-of-ireland-to-1800/ Although it will be quite a task, it allows linking to the legislation. Do we want a separate article for each law? [Comment also posted on the companion page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Acts_of_the_Parliament_of_Ireland,_1701%E2%80%931800
Technolalia (talk) 07:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Tami Farrell

message: "Farrell was one of four members of the top five to wear white, and continued a tradition that saw all the winners from 1998 wear either white or pale pink."  This seems like coincidental trivia.  Can anyone suggest why it's worth keeping in this article? Alvis (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Foofur

message: LOL, THAT GUY IS TOTALLY MY IDOL!
IF I WAS GOING TO THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, I'D TOTALLY REPLICATE IT! FOOFUR FOREVER! 67.186.163.48 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foofur, Illinois 

message: I have attempted to find the actual current owner of this show but so far i have come to brick walls due to not being able to get returned contacts. The show is credited to have been produced by Hanna Barbera and SEPP. Warner Brothers owns Hanna Barbera but has stated they do not own this show as it was done for work for hire.
So naturally this must mean SEPP is the owner but the problem with that is SEPP is no longer functioning meaning the rights must be in the hands of SEPP's parent company Dupuis or SEPP's former head Freddy Monnickendam. Now my attempt to contact Dupuis on the issue was not returned and i have no way of knowing if Monnickendam is still alive and/or how to contact him or his next of kin.
I am aware the show did get DVD releases in dutch region 2, as found online in my research since this began in trying to find out who owns it to ask for it to be brought to DVD in region 1, the company that distributed it there was BrightVision Entertainment. My inquiry to them about who's gave them liscense to it was not returned either.
If anyone with any pull or knowledge please feel free to impart this and know region 1 fans want this show on DVD. We remember it from when it did air in the US and many people ask Warner Brothers for it every year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.158 (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner 

message: Is there any reason why someone re-added "Children's television series" to the genre section in the markup outside of the reason that my edit removing it accidentally broke it? 96.18.182.191 (talk) 20:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships

message: Could someone please take a look at this. An IP declines to engage on Talk - and has now deleted cited text and the ref. - Davidships (talk) 01:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Mykonos Magic]]'' 

message: Following the 6 week plus deletion discussion about the notability of the , I've opened a discussion at MILHIST re the notability of naval trawlers and similar vessels. Please feel free to contribute. Mjroots (talk) 09:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Auxiliary warships

message: Shouldn't Borys Aleksandrov (research vessel) be RV Borys Aleksandrov ? -- 65.92.244.237 (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are acceptable disambiguation practices. Personally I prefer brackets over prefixes. Tupsumato (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

text: My preference too. Because the ship name is a more natural search term than RV. - Davidships (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borys Aleksandrov 

message: Does anyone have access to a copy of this? I'm interested to see if there's anything about the Ed Howard (also known as Howard or Edward Howard) beyond what is included already in the article for the warship it became, CSS General Polk. Hog Farm  Talk 00:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The search doesn't reveal any info. Mjroots (talk) 08:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way's Packet Directory
Talk:Tiburón Island

message: Is the information about San Miguel correct? There is an important "point" called "Punta San Miguel", but that's not a mountain, but rather a point (as in peninsula). 62.90.78.1 19:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Although the island area in square kilometers is almost exact (it's actually 1200.928 sq km, source: http://mapserver.inegi.gob.mx/geografia/espanol/datosgeogra/extterri/frontera.cfm?c=154 , the conversion from sq. kilometers to sq. miles is incorrect, as 1 sq mile = 2.5889 sq km. The island's area in sq miles is 463.89. 
--G.fimbres 08:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island Area incorrect in square miles
Talk:James Record

message: I'd say the guy seems notable, although the article is hard-up for some citations and formatting. But, more importantly-- Why is this titled "Acceptible file formats"? Cantras 19:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, I agree - will move to James Record and tag  and  - Tiswas(t/c) 19:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable but in need of cleanup 

message: This article has been untouched for too long with no cleaning. I've been brutal - removed cruft, added tags, attempted to improve the style and order the article a little better. There's more pruning to do, however - the sourcing is still inadequate for the claims - Tiswas(t/c) 09:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added quite a bit to the article, including the date of death from the Social Security Death Index, a partial bibliography, and a nice photo from our pals at NASA. There is still quite a lot to do as James Record is one of the five or six most important people to Huntsville, Alabama, in the latter half of the 20th century. - Dravecky 23:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:The Art of Love (1965 film)

message: Does the value of an artist's work not go up after his/her death?
Mark Twain explored a similar scenario with "Is He Dead?" which he wrote in 1898. (66.162.249.170 (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value of an artist's work
Talk:The Journal of Collective Negotiations

message: David A. Dilts is co-author of a quote in the lead of this article. That citation is from 1990.  For truth-in-advertising purposes, Dilts became editor of the Journal of Collective Negotiations in 2003. ("David A. Dilts, Ph.D." School of Business and Management Sciences. Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. Accessed 2009-07-01.) - Tim1965 (talk) 22:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: David Dilts

message: A duplicate article with some odd POV commentary and occasional vandalism has existed at Journal of collective negotiations since July 2009.  I want to make it into a redirect to back here, but first I'm making sure we don't lose any valid edits from that article over the last several months.  Can anyone verify or comment on the following claims, before merging them into the original article?
*"the journal was defunct in the years 2001, 2002, and 2004"
*"Since [the 2004 changes], most of the authors in the journal come from [Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne]"
*included in subjects of journal articles: "the minimum wage"
I realize the duplicate article and commentary was added by someone with an axe to grind, but I tried to highlight the most rational statements to insure we retain any apt descriptions and not throw the baby out with the bathwater.  I hope I'm not naively walking into the middle of some kind of battlefield, since I see this article has been indefinitely semi-protected since June 2009 (right before the duplicate was created).  ——Rich jj (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *I would argue that anything lacking citation be rejected. The first two claims are challengeable; the third probably not so (and might be added without citation). - Tim1965 (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging duplicate article 

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:21, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes
Talk:Ginga Densetsu Riki

message: Who wrote those ungodly long descriptions? A summarization is indeed needed. As for cites, I don't know of any informational Riki books, except for the manga itself. How do you cite a manga? --DameGreyWulf (talk) 05:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to hack down those descriptions :) See  for how to reference a book, which would include manga volumes. At minimum, you must be able to reference a specific volume for character information, while things like author notes should also include page numbers.  In general, the plot needs no sourcing, but it would be good to have for specific claims about the characters. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HOLY CRAP
Talk:Élisabeth de Vaudey

message: Where does this come from? Are the rights "clean"? Given that it is so far from usual Wikipedia style, I am wondering whether it is original work. - Jmabel | Talk 19:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! - Jmabel | Talk 01:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bebot

message: Should there be a short description of the inclusion of Stockton's Little Manila in the Gen 1 video?
MackDieselX27 05:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Little Manila?

message: I read from the article that this song wasn't released in US except in Asian countries. I wonder why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.9.126.41 (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason sounds kinda racist. 124.106.203.120 14:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I dont think there were any racist intentions, it is merely truth. Tagalog is a language spoken by very few people in the general population. Despite any favor I may have towards the song or mainstream exposure for a minority group, I understand why the record label may have balked at the chance to put their $$ behind it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.211.199.79 (talk) 08:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  yes no racism was intended just the fact that American record execs don't like putting money behind non English songs and American radio doesn't like to play non English music. Besides the song isn't geared to the American public at large... it's a song for the Phil-am community so expecting a large scale American release is probably not realistic. harlock_jds 01:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not released in the US? 

message: I have the CD, Monkey Business. The name of the song is BeBop, not BeBot. Please change this.
Thank You.
Gossipgirl1 (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, this is incorrect. Is your version legitimate? Dodgy/copied CDs don't always have very good track lists. See    and  Astral (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE NAME OF THE SONG ISN'T BEBOT! ITS BEBOP!!! 

message: bebot is all about food (mainly about chicken adobo)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.150.132 (talk) 08:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bebot is spanish 

message: This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a musical recording that does not indicate its own importance and where the artist's article does not exist, because... (your reason here) --91.2.151.11 (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:D Fun Pak

message: On my copy of this release, which is in a cardsleeve, there is no barcode. This usually indicates a promotional item, but there are no markings specifying it is promotional. Was this item made available for purchase, given away for free, given away promotionally...? CouplandForever (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Is This a Promotional Release?
Talk:Girlguiding Anglia

message: The region article and this county article are both small. As with the Scouting UK articles, the County articles are unlikely to be maintainable as they will attract lists of local units etc. I think this article should be merged here. --Bduke  (Discussion) 11:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - although I am anxious that the information on the campsites and jamboree is preserved. Kingbird (talk) 20:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. Glad you support. I should have notified you of this as you wrote it. I'll just go ahead and do it. --Bduke  (Discussion) 23:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of [[Girlguiding Essex South East]]

message: Is there more than one Broadstone Warren? The one that I used to use was a Scout Association site in the Ashdown Forest, in Sussex.   --Yendor1958 (talk) 08:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Camp Site Query - Broadstone Warren
Talk:Watkins Incorporated

message: This article is not sufficiently objective and needs revision. It's celebratory, and neglects to mention that Watkins operates as an MLM (Multilevel Marketing) scheme - or perhaps that is what they mean by "enhanced sales techniques?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.52.214 (talk) 04:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Objectivity
Talk:Stokenchurch BT Tower

message: A blurred image can be found here ( http://flickr.com/photos/stuartyeates/63985976/ ) with the CC-SA-2.0 licence. feydey 19:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a further photo at :File:Stokenchurch - geograph.org.uk - 9537.jpg, if that would add anything new to the article. --Trevj (talk) 13:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image