Talk:Battle of Mława

message: Just in case Jadger wanted to delete the reference again and then claim the citation is not there, I'll give the quote here:  Ludność cywilna nie podlegała podczas niej jakielkolwiek ochronie, na porządu dziennym były ostrzeliwania kolumn cywilnych uciekinierów, używania cywilów jako żywych tarcz (po raz pierwszy we wrześniowej bitwie pod Mławą), branie zakładników (na przykład na czas, odbieranej przez Hitlera, zwycięskiej defilady w Warszawie, 5 października 1939) i odstraszające egzekucje., which could be translated as The civilians were deprived of any protection; strafing civilians blocking the roads, using them as living shields (for the first time during the battle of Mława), taking hostages (for instance during Hitler's parade in Warsaw on October 5, 1939) and preventive executions. //Halibutt 22:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gazeta Olsztyńska is hardly a tabloid, at least not more than any local daily newspaper is. The fact that the article does not suit your POV does not yet make this newspaper a tabloid, does it. As such it is just as valid reference as any other reliable newspaper, but just to make you happier I added two sources more, just feel free to use them. //Halibutt 09:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Of course, it is not about Vinkt - this is a talk page, we can use intellectual argument here. I only wanted to point out that it happened more than once (without the German High Command punishing the officers responsible - very important), which makes the claim more plausible. And no, it was not THAT common that it does not need mentioning at all. It happened more frequently in the East than in the West, and more with raw troops than with seasoned detachments. By the way, your argument "if it was so common, why mention it" could be rephrased as "well we know they were all war criminals, so why mention this little detail". No, they were not all war criminals. --Pan Gerwazy 21:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Another reading suggestion for everyone: Wikipedia:The Last Word. Balcer 23:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Jadger, I am sorry if I spoil what could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship, but the point is that along with a number of reasonable edits, you deleted a fact with its reference. On the grounds that the reference was no good, uncheckable, standalone. Since that last point has now been refuted, that part of your edit looks suspiciously like vandalism. Now, because anyone else intervening may possible ruin the rest of your changes - would you please be so kind as to put it back yourself? --Pan Gerwazy 09:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jadger's actions 

message: An image used in this article, File:Polish bunkers.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 11 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Polish bunkers.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: For WP:POLAND. Agree with previous milhist review, the citations are insufficient. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review: failed