lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Outline of poker

message: Does anyone else think that this should come under :Category:Lists that should be categories? In fact, most of it is redundant as it is categorized all ready. Essexmutant 16:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not me, and here's why: These lists have great potential for further development, and shouldn't be deleted because that would be wasting building blocks of the encyclopedia.  Mature lists, such as well-developed outlines must go through preliminary stages of development.  Not to allow them to and demanding that lists be fully developed upon their initial posting denies them the benefit of collaboration.  That's the whole point of this wiki: it's an environment in which many people can build upon the work of others who came before them.  I've upgraded this list to an outline and have added it to Wikipedia's set of outlines, which is one of the subsystems in Wikipedia's overall contents navigation system.  I couldn't have done this if the list had been deleted based on the short-sighted rationale that it is in some way redundant to the corresponding category.  See WP:CLN for further details about Wikipedia's redundant navigation systems, how they differ, how they complement each other, and how they are synergistic with each other.  Further developments to this outline are on the way, such as annotations to assist topic selection, etc.  The Transhumanist 11:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: For examples of other outlines further along in their development, see:
* Outline of sports
** Outline of basketball
* Outline of games
** Outline of chess
The Transhumanist 12:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar outlines 

message: There are a great many topics/articles on poker that have yet to be added to this outline.  Wikipedia's coverage of poker is extensive, and this outline is intended to be a map of that coverage.  Please scour the encyclopedia for poker-related articles, and add links to them to this outline.  Thank you.  The Transhumanist 12:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What next? 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Sociative case

message: Finnish dialect and slang -nkaa - isn't that only a genetive + clitic, from kanssa, because it doesn't agree with the root in vowel harmony? (E.g. kissankaa, käyränkaa)
According to , Kashmiri also has a sociative case. Anyone know more about this? PruneauT 17:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Chetwode

message: The Manor in Chetwode has been occupied by the Collins Family since (I believe) the 1950's when they lived at the Grange in Chetwode.
--Daedelus 18:29, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: How did they come into possession of the manor?  If it was through inheritance that statement in the article is still correct. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 20:58, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: How could there be an article on Chetwode without mentioning the Chetwode Family. John de Chetwode, Lord of Chetwode founded the Priory of Chetwood when? That's why I looked this up. The manor "belonged to a Chetwode before the Conquest" is the best I can find elsewhere.Dangnad (talk) 01:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the answer is very simple. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedic project compiled by editors. Nothing would exist without the efforts of these users. No one has got around to the Chetwodes as they have been busy elsewhere in the project so why not join in and have a go at compiling the information on the Chetwodes yourself.Tmol42 (talk) 01:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  You might find it useful to add info to this page also Baron ChetwodeTmol42 (talk) 01:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chetwode Family
Talk:Torpedo tube

message: Need links to specific classes of submarines, particularly some examples of how arrays of two sizes of torpedo tube have been used. Some of these articles do not yet exist. Andrewa 18:32, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I came here looking for info on the time it takes to reload a torpedo
tube. If somebody has a ref to this info, please add it here.
--Anniepoo 22:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  speed 

message: I came to find out how above-surface tubes work - for example on the MTBs. How does the torpedo get out of the tube into the water?  Can someone add a piece on this?  Michael of Lucan (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this, I was looking to find out the same thing... does it use a lever or a spring or a charge or what? 208.100.172.164 (talk) 11:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MTB tubes 

message: The 16-inch and 21 inch tubes, were they the diameter or the length? Alphapeta (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurements 

message: How dose lunch 202.5.58.73 (talk) 17:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Et52c torpedo luncher 

message: How dose lunch 202.5.58.73 (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Et52c torpedo luncher 

message: How dose lunch 202.5.58.73 (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Et52c torpedo luncher
Talk:James B. Weaver

message: Weaver won neighboring Kansas, including most of the counties directly bordering Iowa, but didn't win even one county in his home state Iowa. How come? Please add this info if you have it. -- 77.7.152.171 (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How come he had so little success in his home state in 1892? 

message: I have translated this article to Chinese Wikipedia here and promoted to FA status, and I want to thank User:Coemgenus for his effort to write this amazing article. --Jarodalien (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now a FA in Chinese Wikipedia 

message: Definitely, the character portrayed by weaver was great. He believed in trying and success. WAKAYANGE (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure for success  

message: I was in the Wikipedia library and in Ancestry his death date is February 12th, not February 6th. The reference that I got it from doesn’t work for me: https://www-ancestryinstitution-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/facts?_phcmd=u(%27https://www-ancestryinstitution-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/search/ --Misc Practice (talk | contributions) 19:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:The 10% Solution for a Healthy Life

message: Hi!
So I'm thumbing through this book and comparing it to what I remember from Fantastic Voyage (Kurzweil). I seem to remember that FV recomends eating more proteins and low-glycemic foods (which usually means lower carb) while 10% states that we eat too many protein (too much urea produced) and recomends more carbs, albeit in the form of vegetables.
So, while I'm not accusing anyone of anything I wonder if anyone has anything to comment about this...
71.222.149.170 11:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies 

message: The rest of the page says it's fat he objects to, but there's no particular fat in jam, so I don't see why he would object to it? :/ Sticky Parkin 03:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If I recall, in the book Kurzweil also recommended moderating sugar intake.  Jam is primarily sugar and nutrient-poor.   Kurzweil's more recent writings on health have recommended cutting sugar intake to zero. --Frankg (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you possibly mention what he says in this particular book about sugar/jam in this article?  At the mo it just discusses his views on fat. Sticky Parkin 17:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look for yourself - the book is online.  But Kurzweil has written an updated book called Fantastic Voyage with a more refined set of recommendations.  He no longer recommends avoiding fat, for example. --Frankg (talk) 17:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: jam?
Talk:Tripwire

message: Should be a disambig page I think. --Unforgettableid | talk to me 08:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: dab

message: Some of today's articles about the 2012 Aurora shooting mention a "9D trip device." I Googled around but did not find any pages that explain what this is. --Marc Kupper|talk 00:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "9D trip device"
Talk:Engel (song)

message: *Previous deletion debate
Why is the article still a stub? I think it's preety complete.
This page was written to be the single, not the song; I　ｍａｄｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｎｇ　ａ　ｒｅｄｉｒｅｃｔ　ａｎｄ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｉｎｇｌｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅａｌ　ｐａｇｅ．  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dramamoose (talk • contribs) 22:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The subject of the song should be added. I am German and understand the lyrics. The singer raises the question why one cannot see the angels. The angels sing that they have fear and are alone, whereupon the singer states that he does not want to be an angel. The lyrics question the Christian dogma that you will be an angel when you lead a pious life. --Doovele (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No it shouldn't. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs#Article_content: "Do not include original research such as opinions about a song, or interpretations of the lyrics or even statements about what the song is about". SolarFlashDiscussion 00:30, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject of the song
Talk:Phantom energy

message: Instead of deleting this, we should just replace it with a stub. The actual concept of phantom energy exists (see the pages which link to it for explanation), this would probably better be classified as vandalism. EagleFalconn 19:26, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Nothingness cannot rip off; thus during the Planckian Rip, a new universe will emerge.
An old theory. We should mention all theories.
::Is big bang the rip off of nothingness? Certainly not because: a. we have work and potential, b. quantum physics is in effect. That is certainly not nothingness. Nothing cannot exist (because if it did it would be something; which is different).
:: Serious physicists how focus on data, say that the Universa will thermally die a permanent final non-Big-Banging death. (holy mother of turd; and universe was fun...😢) On the other hand, we then have to physically define spatiotemporal or metalogically deeper QFT state permanence 😜  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4119:B900:41CC:8AFB:EA8F:116B (talk) 05:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ''looping Universe theory'': Phantom energy Big Bang
Talk:USS Ellet

message: The Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships lists Ellet as a Gridley class destroyer. However other sources clearly indicate that she was a Benham-class, including the photo page of the Naval Historical Center. Please update the class type only if you have definitive evidence other than DANFS. Jinian 19:52, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Class

message: Ellet sank RO-35 in August 1943 2fort5r (talk) 07:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub
Talk:Friedrich Schleiermacher

message: Could someone familiar with the correct pronunciation for the name Schleiermacher please give me a phonetic spelling?--Riferimento 00:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found pronunciation and added to article[]--Riferimento 17:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct pronunciation for Schleiermacher

message: There is a lone "frameless|alt=" in the right-hand box. Not sure how to fix this 209.147.99.51 (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. The issue was at :Template:Infobox Philosopher. — goethean ॐ 21:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error that needs to be fixed 

message: I was trying to find this footnote:  Michael A. G. Haykin, Liberal Protestantism, p. 3.
I could not find it anywhere, so I contacted Dr. Haykin himself.  He said it sounded like something he said during a lecture.  He said it is true, but "Liberal Protestantism" is not a published work, and therefore not verifyable.  So should the footnote go away?  Not sure what edit to make.  Can a more experienced editor help? Jsyersiii (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Citation
Talk:Jim Dine

message: On May 11, 2008, co-author of the 1960's musical "Hair" James Rado was interviewed on Sirius Radio / Best of Broadway, and claimed that the reason there is no song "Hair" in the musical is because the title of the show came very late in the writing process. He further claimed that the title comes from his seeing an art piece with the same name by Jim Dine. If anyone has a catalog, this would be useful for second-confirmation. Scott Clarkson (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dine Art Piece Gave Name to Musical "Hair" 
Talk:Robert Raikes

message: Would someone rephrase this last sentence in the article:  "He used the proceeds, among other things, to set up the first sunday school..."  I find the clause "among other things" both (a)vague and (b)confusing.  (a): Unless the "other things" can be specified (or hyperlinked-to!), the phrase is essentially useless -- it doesn't convey useful information.  (b): the way this sentence is punctuated, it says that proceeds and things were used to set up the first sunday school.  That seems to be an odd thing to state (what other things?  tables and chairs?), so perhaps it was intended to say that proceeds were used to set up the first sunday school and other things.  Which still leaves me curious as to what else the proceeds were used for.
Sorry I don't have sufficient knowledge about this topic to offer an article revision as to what it should say.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.16.9.110 (talk • contribs) . This was added in 2004.
I am expanding today from google scholar and google book search results.  Sources used include ,  and those sources cited as references. GRBerry 02:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A neglected monument in the classical style to Raikes the Kingston-on-Hull banker (see the disambiguation page) stands on Welton Wold, Yorkshire.  A photo thereof is available via Google Maps.  210.50.143.21 (talk) 08:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raikes Mausoleum
Talk:Muse Software

message: This was added to the main article at the end by an anon user.  Anyone want to take a shot at putting back in the article in a Wiki manner is welcome to:
:
:From what I know, the company was sold on the auction block due to bankruptcy.  All the game titles were sold to two auctioneers.  The furniture and computer equipment was sold to Bill Stealey and Sid Meier of Microprose.  I went home with the MUSE's books.  Silas Warner, to my knowledge, did not own the rights to Castle Wolfenstein, since they were sold with the rest of the company in bankruptcy.  There are several versions to this story and one has Carmack and Romero finding out that the copyrights had expired, which is not true since a copyright lasts for 75 years where a company owns the rights and 50 years after the death of the creator when an individual owns the rights.  Copyrights can be renewed by changing the design slightly and applying again.
— Frecklefoot | Talk 21:33, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
::I have no personal knowledge of the above, but I also believe that Silas didn't own the Wolfenstein rights anymore; id tracked down the guy who did have the rights, who was selling Castle Wolfenstein disks "out of his basement", and bought the rights from him.  Obviously a source would be useful here.  Tempshill 19:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous addition

message: I'm pretty sure I saw in an old computer magazine that MUSE actually stands for 'Microcomputer Users' Software Exchange', can anyone confirm this?
203.167.158.143 02:26, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What MUSE stands for?

message: Stumbled upon an interesting source from a Google Books archive of InfoWorld magazine from 1981 which indicated that Muse were the publishers for the mildly successful Apple II game "Three Mile Island". I haven't found evidence of any publisher information anywhere else. If somebody is able to verify this source it might be a useful addition given the rarity of information on the game title on the internet.  - Source
--Twistie.man (talk) 14:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Mile Island
Talk:Solow growth model

message: The Solow growth model is a rather advanced theoretical tool, or at least it can be. There are still a lot of relations not accounted for and I will try to continue updating this page.
I'd appreciate any help I can get with the... rather inelegant formatting.
To further explain topics such as balanced growth and the golden rule of growth I feel that it is important to add graphs. I'll get on it right away.
Thanks for the formatting help by the way ;-)
--Albron 23:00, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Mannose

message: While I appreciate the need to avoid false or unreliable sources, it seems that the Springer-published, peer-reviewed World Journal of Urology has been suggested as a primary source (certainly by Edgar181). I don't believe this is updated.   The authors of the paper showing effectiveness of Mannose for recurrent UTI in a Randomized controlled trial  are very carefull  to say that one RCT success isn't sufficient to justify a broadbrush claim stating We believe that D-mannose may be a useful agent for the prevention of recurrent UTIs but further clinical trials will be necessary. (in their associated commentary at DOI: 10.1111/bju.12492)
I note that these papers were published after much of the discussion on this talk page about the veracity of the scientific claims.
Jpmaytum (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, medical information should be supported by secondary sources, rather than primary sources (see WP:MEDRS for details).  That's why I added the  template to the comment about urinary tract infections.  Do you know if there is any review article/literature review that covers the research regarding mannose and UTIs?  That would be the ideal kind of source to use to support the "Therapeutic potential" section.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Please see WP:MEDRS. Jytdog (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated studies
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Edward Ebersol

message: I tend to disagree because it is notable because of his celebrity status.  Yes, it is newsworthy, but in this case some children of celebrities should get their page too.  If Larry Hagman and Sean Lennon can get their own pages...
...but, of course, it is a sad time for the Ebersol/St. James family.  Do what you will, if it means re-editing or merging the article.
Hiphats 22:39, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Laser construction

message: What makes up a compact disc?
Brian Wagner
A compact disc is composed of a 50/50 mixture of wheat and barley, baked in a baking oven to a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin. Thanks for choosing Wikipedia!
Don Collins  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.189.201.235 (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

message: "some lasers do not use an optical cavity, but instead rely on very high optical gain to produce significant amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) without requiring feedback of the light back into the gain medium. Such lasers are said to be superluminescent"
Isn't this called superradiant lasing? When the gain is so high, such as in N2 lasers, there is no need for an FP resonator...?--Deglr6328 03:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Superluminescent lasers

message: Does this article really make sense? Not only is the Lemma misleading, as it does explain the construction or design. It describes the principle of a laser. Also there is no general construction of a laser, as they are all different. But most of all, the content is exactly what belongs to Laser. 7Piguine (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no expert on lasers, but I was wondering the same thing. I guess you might want separate articles if the laser article is too long. In that case, it seems like everything about how a laser works would go here, and everything else (e.g. applications) would go in the main article. Not sure if that's what's going on here though. Danielx (talk) 04:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundance to [[Laser]] 

message: This article says that the laser medium produces gain (and is also called the gain medium), but isn't that what the optical resonator does? If I understand how a laser works correctly, the laser medium produces light, it bounces around in the optical resonator, which makes the light more intense, until there's enough energy to emerge from one of the laser (the one with the less reflective mirror). If the optical resonator makes the light more powerful, doesn't that mean that the optical resonator is responsible for gain? Danielx (talk) 04:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Gain (as it is defined for a laser) is indeed just a property of the laser medium and how much it is pumped. But you get laser light only if the gain is larger than the optical losses, and these depend on the resonator. --Danh (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medium produces gain?