lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Toh

message: Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written from a neutral point of view.  Sentences and phrases like, "Peter eloquently articulates words and sounds that represent the world we live in" and "Peter Toh is the musician that will take control of the music industry" are not neutral.  I have removed some of them, but left the first phrase and some others because I don't want to decimate the article.  If someone can re-write it, it'd be good. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Anthony Rupert 02:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality tag

message: This guy's only significance seems to be with his old band.  He's got one self-made EP he's now trying to promote.. so what?  This would qualify as a speedy in it's current condition, but before deleting it maybe it should just be a redirect to The Stryder.  I see no indication that this guy meets WP:MUSIC guidelines (or comes remotely close) by himself.  Friday (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance?
Talk:Zaytsev's rule

message: The rewrite/Wikification was completed on 13 May 2012. Please feel free to make comments on the changes and add/delete content as you see fit. Ckalnmals (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

message: Little question. Isn't the "β-carbon" the second carbon that attaches to a functional group (the carbon is attached at the second, or beta, position). In 2-iodobutane, being the 2-iodine the functional group, isn't the "α-carbon" the carbon-3 and the "β-carbon" the carbon-4? What am I missing here?--Spmoura (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  β-carbon
Talk:Kopanitsa

message: Kopanitsa (Popular around Sofia) and Gankino (popular in Northern Bulgaria) are completely different dances, both in 11/16 (2,2,3,2,2) but popular in different regions of Bulgaria. Another such dance is Krivo Horo (from Eastern Thrace), and other dances (most of them found in the Western part of the country). If the term Kopanitsa is used to generalize all the Bulgarian dances in 11/16, this should be mentioned in the article. Nonetheless, it would help if the article is backed up with materials from Bulgarian folklorists such as Djenev and Haralampiev. At the current state the article is misleading and inaccurate. 78.86.82.106 (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kopanitsa is not Gankino 
Talk:Foreign relations of Rwanda

message: Amazing! This article consists of an almost completely unsourced lede, with sentences written in 2002, unaltered, then one section (bilateral relations) consisting of a list of colourful flags and obligatory refs of diplomatic missions, which about 20 people a day look at. Wuerzele (talk) 07:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A stub for 20 years
Talk:TSS Stefan Batory

message: Was this the ship that Lee Harvey Oswald traveled on from Holland to America? --Tj999 (talk) 14:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lee Harvey Oswald

message: What's the definition of that term? Why, for example, don't the Queen Elizabeth 2 and Queen Mary 2 count? 86.143.50.243 (talk) 23:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the last regularly scheduled transatlantic liner"
Talk:Mount Wilson FM Broadcasters

message: There is an idiot doing programming for KKGO by forcing Christmas music on us over a month before Christmas. If the object is to lose listeners, he or she has succeeded. I am now playing cassette tapes 
Bill from Winnetka—
This listing combines some information on point for Mount Wilson FM Broadcasters, Inc.
But it also has a (drop-in) entry for Saul Levine which is biographical.  
Normally Wikipedia would have separate entries and one would hyperlink over to the bio for Mr. Levine.  
Perhaps someone would like to improve this rather hybrid entry ... km 70.134.67.215 (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Liénard equation

message: Notable omission from the main article is a biographical reference to the person behind this eponymously named theorem. DFH 20:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The PlanetMath template or external link appears broken...Nimur 15:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, the template requires a urlname attribute. Nimur 15:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was Liénard ?
Talk:Hospital Besieged: The Evil Hand Revealed!

message: This is my favorite episode of 'Naruto' so far.  Gaara is such a cool charactor, and I was glad to finally see some history.  It's true, he is sort of disterbed, but still cool.  At first, when I saw this episode, I thought the person in Gaara's flashback, I thought that person was a WOMAN!  Apparently it's actually a dude.  How odd.  I wonder if there was a person in Gaara's village who maybe even felt a LITTLE  bad for being so mean?  His childhood is so haunting...it almost makes you feel bad for him......COOLEST EPISODE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
: "I wonder if there was a person in Gaara's village who maybe even felt a LITTLE  bad for being so mean?  His childhood is so haunting...it almost makes you feel bad for him......COOLEST EPISODE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
: This is why I am ashamed of watching the show.
: Naruto is actually a good show. Good plot, characters etc. There are some bad parts to it, like Sakuras constant "Sausage!" screams and such. But what really gives the show a bad name is the people who watch it. Around 40% of the people who watch it are those kids I see at the supermarket "play fighting" screaming NARUTOSSOOOKEWL. 50 are kids on the net fighting over subs and dubs not realising that the dub is true to the original and that they're watching the same plot, character development etc.EAB 18:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:MF 67

message: There is one MF 67 from Line 2 that was converted into a service train. It is called the Convoi d'Auteuil. Perhaps some info on this particular train can be added to the article? Wslupecki (talk) 00:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: MF 67 Service Train

message: A tender has now been put out for replacement of the MF67. It Will Be Replaced By MF19 And Moved To Line 2 Along With MF77, MF88 & MF01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide reliable sources, per the policy on verifiability. Otherwise, it is merely guesswork, with the possibility of crystal-ball gazing. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement & Movement
Talk:Eddy-current testing

message: 203.97.190.122 (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

message: Why does 'Cyclograph' redirect to this article? A cyclograph (also known as an arcograph) is a drawing instrument. —MegaPedant 01:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclograph 

message: Alternating current field measurement appears to be discussing the same process under a name that is not very common.  Ahything unique should be merged from that article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge

message: Please note that this animated video contains informational content on the process of pulsed eddy-current inspection as well as information on the D-annulus level of a platform. The content is not promotional and the link to www.youtube.com is the original link to the informational content. Could you please consider and revert your edit? Many thanks in advance. -  Esperanza Palto talk  —Preceding undated comment added 15:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Video on D-PEC
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/HighInBC 2

message: User:HighInBC
Category talk:	2
Category:	1
Help:	1
Image talk:	37
Image:	290
Mainspace	1380
Talk:	919
Template talk:	1
Template:	1
User talk:	1884
User:	263
Wikipedia talk:	288
Wikipedia:	1168
avg edits per article	2.58
earliest	00:20, 8 February 2006
number of unique articles	2418
total	6235
HighInBC's editcount summary stats as of 20:50, November 21st 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 20:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I have moved this page to its proper title. This is consistent with the other 2nd (and subsequent) RfA nominations. --Siva1979Talk to me 17:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved page
Talk:Electoral districts of Victoria

message: A project for someone to do. I'm looking at Teresias84 136.186.1.188 02:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I'm happy to have a look at this, but it might take a little while as Wikipedia comes second to my honours thesis.Teiresias84 03:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Luckily I found an old project on my hard drive where I easily gleamed the needed infomation (saving me a trip to the library).Teiresias84 05:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to create list of former electorates 

message: Many electorate articles are tagged on the article as stubs, but it looks to me as if they are start class. What do others think? Even this article with its two long lists was assessed here on the talk pages as a stub, but not on the article. I changed that to start. --Bduke (talk) 06:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Back pressure

message: This article has way too narrow a view and desperately needs to be rewritten. Back pressure is encountered in many fluid flow situations, not just automotive mufflers. For instance, in the plumbing industry, special valves must be inserted into the system to prevent back pressure from causing a reverse flow that would contaminate household water from a hose bib, would contaminate municipal water supplies from a household or other service receiver, etc.
I am removing, for the moment, the unsupportable and ridiculous claim that mufflers are becoming more irrelevant with modern automobiles. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hope that someone with a bit of fluid dynamics background will give this article the tender loving touch it so desperately deserves.
Dlw20070716 (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too narrow a view 

message: "The term backpressure is a wrong term because..." As soon as I read this I marked it for cleanup because this is just an abysmal first sentence. --Petercorless (talk) 21:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "wrong term" (sic)
Talk:Beşiktaş J.K./Archive 1

message: Since there is an emblem section, maybe it's a good idea to put the stadium on the top near the lead and the emblem pic in the emblem section... Mgm|(talk) 08:49, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
:The ideal look would be as in AC Milan or Juventus; I think it is already a customary style to put the emblem at the top of the page, alongside the first paragraph that describes the club. Also, the stadium image really is redundantly big, but I know that if I would resize the image, Erginer would re-enlarge it.--leandros 10:31, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: amblem

message: Beşiktaş J.K. → Beşiktaş J.K – I don't know why User:Thexcode moved it to Beşiktaş J.K (one dot) So i moved to Beşiktaş J.K. (two dot), but other Tukish team no dots Matt86hk talk 00:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: * Weak Oppose: There isn't much consistency in the Turkish club article names and the categories have the periods just like the article.  —Wknight94 (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Based on looking at the official website and the text of the article, the proper name should be Beşiktaş JK, with no dots, right? —Centrx→talk • 00:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Beşiktaş were wearing an all-white kit during Beşiktaş v Tottenham (Beşiktaş at home) in the UEFA Cup Group Stage, is the kit in the article correct or have Beşiktaş now got an all-white home kit? - MTC 17:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kit?
Talk:MP 59

message: template:infobox train and some data might be nice. And by the way, what is a "forked version"? Peter Horn User talk 22:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I meant additional data in the infobox already there. Peter Horn User talk 22:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox and data 

message: I recently rewrote and expanded the article based on information from the corresponding French Wikipedia article :fr:MP 59. I strongly believe the additional information will help in improving the article. Wslupecki (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite & Expansion of article 

message: MP59 Will Be Pull Out To Be Replaced. MP14 Will Replace The Stock. It Will Be Moved To Line 1 Along With MP05 & MP73.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 14:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide reliable sources, per the policy on verifiability. Otherwise, it is merely guesswork, with the possibility of crystal-ball gazing. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement & Movement
Talk:Mr. Bucket

message: why was the section about the controversial song deleted? That was a major part of the toys history.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.146.222 (talk) 20:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because it was unreferenced original research. --Ouzo (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone can hear that song. Unless you're suggesting that the song and the commercial were fabricated, I don't really see how this is unreferenced (or at least unreferencable) or original research. Alhanalem (talk) 21:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversal song

message: I think the image on this article could do with just the image of the Mr. Bucket toy without the box, shovels, or balls. It's non-free, so having less of the image in question would make it better. RteeeeKed (talk) 20:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image
Talk:MP 73

message: MP73 Will Be Replaced By MP14. It Will Be Moved To Line 1 Along With MP05 & MP59.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide reliable sources, per the policy on verifiability. Otherwise, it is merely guesswork, with the possibility of crystal-ball gazing. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement & Movement
Talk:Acoustic scale

message: I have tagged the article as not providing sufficient context for the following reasons:
* The phrase "symmetrically balanced sections, especially periods" doesn't mean much to me.
* The reference to the golden section links only to the mathematical ratio, and does not provide any clue as to how it applies to music.
* The table describes the golden section as "chromatic, dynamic, close, circular" and other such words with no explanation as to why this should be the case. It seems to have been copied from a source without providing any accompanying explanation.
It would be better if this article was written in a more encyclopedic manner, as well. Instead, it reads like opinion of one or two musical analysts.
--Rhebus 21:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even without having the book to refer to, I'm sure the talk about balanced sections, periods, golden sections and Fibonacci sequences refers to do the larger architecture of Bartók's music and has nothing whatever to do with the overtone scale as such. This certainly isn't the only music theory article on Wikipedia that sounds too much like the speculations of one theorist. Fenneck (talk) 05:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Please cite sources and add that information to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 10:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

text: What does that review say? Hyacinth (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Insufficient context

message: Both scales are the same and I think both articles have enough information between them to form a reliable single one. Any thoughts? ArdClose (talk) 18:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which title would they be at? Hyacinth (talk) 02:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Though it is true that both scales share the same contents... the context differs in their use, especially with the focus on particular notes of the scale... for the acoustic scale the sharp 4th degree is extremely important and often functions structurally, whereas in Jazz the modal scale version emphasizes the flattened 7th more. Therefore I am not sure that the two should be merged. User: Duncan 16:47 27 Sept 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.25.98 (talk) 20:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I think they should be merged, because they refer to the same concept reached by different means (acoustics vs. minor harmony). I don't see where the evidence is for the comment above "in Jazz the modal scale version emphasizes the flattened 7th more". I am a jazz player. If I want to emphasize the 7th and not emphasize #4 in a scale, I can simply use the dominant (i.e. mixolydian) scale, rather than the lydian dominant. Rmkeller (talk) 01:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposition for merge with [[Lydian dominant scale]]
Talk:Rama Records

message: * Groups : The Crows, The Harptones, The Valentines, The Three Pals.
* Subsidiaries : 
* Groups : Frankie Lymon and The Teenagers, The Cleftones, Joey Dee and The Starliters...
* Roulette created in 1956 by Morris Levy and Phil Khal. Sold to Hugo (Peretti) and Luigi in 1957.
* Rock'n'roll : Buddy Knox, Jimmy Bowen, Ronnie Hawkins...
* Folk : Jimmie Rodgers (Hank Snow's son).
* Pop music : Tommy James and The Shondells...
This unsourced material was removed from the article and placed here. When sources are found it can be put back in the article.  Mattisse(talk) 21:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Draft talk:MF 88

message: MF88 Will Be Replaced By MF19. It Will Be Moved To Line 2 In 2025. It Runs On Line 2 Along With MF67, MF77 & MF01.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide reliable sources, per the policy on verifiability. Otherwise, it is merely guesswork, with the possibility of crystal-ball gazing. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement & Movement 

message: Sources, which can surely be used here, exist on the French version of the article. See :fr:MF 88. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added sources from the French article to the relevant parts. I couldn't resubmit because it said I'm rate limited - probably because I'm pretty new to this. I'll try again later. MapAppreciator (talk) 14:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:MF 77

message: MF77 Will Be Replaced By MF19. It Will Be Moved To Line 2 In 2026. It Runs On Line 2 Along With MF67, MF88 & MF01.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 14:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide reliable sources, per the policy on verifiability. Otherwise, it is merely guesswork, with the possibility of crystal-ball gazing. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement & Movement.
Talk:English Folk Dance and Song Society

message: I have just realised that the link to Anne Gilchrist is a woman who died in 1885. This website 
http://www.tradsong.org/sachar96.PDF
mentions an Annie Gilchrist who collected "The Gentlemen Soldier" in 1907, so it must be aidfferent person. The "Anne Gilchrist" mentioned in the article on "The Vaughan williams Library" must be that person as well. A disambiguation page is needed. Ogg 21:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anne Gilchrist
Talk:Vaughan Williams Memorial Library

message: The link to the fictional character "Mike Yates" is spurious. Ogg 21:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—Denise starwilson (talk) 19:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct, according to the location specified in the library's Web site. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Air Travel Organisers' Licensing

message: I've just created this because I was quite surprised to find it didn't already exist. The history section could do with being expanded somewhat. Angus Lepper 21:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Keresztes

message: Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: Fixed some. ResMar 20:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammer 

message: Too bad I only have the translation of The Ottoman centuries by Lord Kinross. Because the last sentence of the introduction is quite ambigious: "Lord Kinross said of the battle that had the Turks been defeated, they would have lost Bulgaria and part of Hungary."   . I checked the above assertion. Yes it is there ; not only that, he also mentions Macedonia and Transilvania. But there may be something wrong either in the original text or in the translation. For one thing, Bulgaria is in the east and Hungary is in the west. If the allies were so victorious as to occupy Bulgaria. than they would easily occupy  whole of Hungary and Serbia (which has not been mentioned at all). So I think the correct sentence must be "...they would have lost Hungary,Serbia and a part of Bulgaria." Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord Kinross 

message: Why does this battle description looks so much like a piece of propaganda ? Irrelevant details meant to glorify one side and villainize the other side are pushed into the story, while major chapters of the battle are strangely skipped. Not sure who's supposed to "guard" this section of wikipedia, but this person should have a hard look here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:5803:4770:1C4C:64E1:9B17:DB7D (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions/Wondering 

message: Hi‎ Göktuğ538538, 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Keresztes&diff=prev&oldid=1174396757
please provide readable links, let us see your claim. Btw Joseph von Hammer is early 1800s author, we can mention him in the text if modern sources refer to him, but we need follow modern academic historians.  OrionNimrod (talk) 06:35, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources, numbers
Talk:A5004 road

message: Is Long Hill (Derbyshire) the complete A5004?  If so, should it be moved to A5004 road to match the other road articles? Regan123 21:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the general Wikipedia principle is that an article headline should explain the article.  In this case it looks like the article should be at A5004 road but in this case I think it is 50-50... Regan123 16:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Yove male mome

message: There appears to be a mistake in the song text, l. 6: На си сдин пои, леле
This does not make sense, nor can I dope out what it might be, and it turns out that I do not own the book so I can't check.  It must be something along the lines of: Една си ги пои...  Please correct!  -- Martha (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check http://pesni.wordpress.com/category/Шопски - there are two versions there, of which the second nearly matches the one given here.  -- Martha (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in the song 
Talk:Ian Martin (UN official)

message: There's another living person named Ian Martin who may be notable enough for a biography. He was a key executive within Barings Bank in the 1980s, and seems to have been an early mentor for notorious Nick Leeson.
Any takers? --Christofurio (talk) 18:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *http://www.libyaherald.com/2012/10/01/the-uns-libyan-legacy/
- Location (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference