Talk:Assassination of Reinhard Heydrich

message: Gosh, this poor thing has gone downhill. Orphaned editing marks, mysterious links. Let me do some technical corrections, I hope I do not modify the content. Paul, in Saudi 16:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I made lot of work on this article since your comment - it just need some clean up (as Im not an english-master;). PS.Reading new and new information about this operation was more exciting than any film I´ve seen in last years (and I´ve seen lot of films:) Szalas
Holy Mary, this thing is in bad shape. I've read this article before, I don't remember it being this broken! I started doing a section edit but quickly realized I was trying to rescue something that probably bears a rewrite. Rhombus 02:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: older comments 

message: Perseus71, I reverted your edit because it contained weasel words, but more importantly because it resulted in a disjointed, nonsensical article. You didn't spellcheck, and your edit did not mesh with the older one. The earlier version was superior. It would have been too much work for me to fix it. I suggest you try again, more carefully. Happy editing, Rodney420 (talk) 14:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted

message: I don't see why the group needs its own article, when the only operation they carried out is this one. All the info from that article could easily be merged into this one. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 23:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger of Out Distance 

message: First of all, this section contains two theories - so it's not appropriate to name this section after only one.  Next, we don't usually entertain fringe theories, so this section really should go away.  Why, as noted by the source, there is no evidence.  Second, no allegations have been made - just a fringe theory, so calling this section an "allegation" gives it credibility that it doesn't deserve.  Rklawton (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conspiracy theories

message: Just a small point, Curda wasn't arrested he voluntarily went to the Gestapo and offered information. The Germans knew he was genuine as he could identify the briefcase used in the attack as opposed to other cases the germans had hidden it in.
His main motivation was the money, As after the war when he had been arrested he was asked why he betrayed his colleagues and he replied "Wouldn't you for a million marks".
He was hung in 1946 completely unrepentant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.71.241 (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CURDA 

message: Hello all, I've just noticed that there's one passage in the article that goes something like this: "Heydrich's sudden collapse...matches the symptoms of BTX poisoning", while all the rest of that section talks about botulinum poisoning.  This is potentially confusing, because BTX generally refers not to botulinum toxin, but to a mixture of benzene, toluene and xylene (which is also toxic, but generally incapable of causing such delayed symptoms upon one-time acute exposure).  So which is it? 67.170.215.166 (talk) 02:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "BTX poisoning"? 

message: The caption reads "The restored car in which Heydrich was mortally wounded" but on the biography page for Heydrich the same picture is captioned "A similar car to the one in which Heydrich was mortally wounded".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.119.151 (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of car in which assassination attempt took place 

message: This article states Curda got 1 million Reichsmark whereas his individual article states 0.5 million. Which is correct?
: Most sources agree on 0.5 million for Čurda. Corrected. --Jvs.cz (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reward 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests June 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:The place where Reinhard Heydrich was killed.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: *1943
*2010
18:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Then and now...the assassination location 

message: "Shrapnels" is incorrect; "shrapnel" is one of those English words like "moose" that is the same in both singular and plural.  "Pieces of shrapnel" would be correct. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrapnel is shrapnel, no matter how many there are  

message: I'm assuming that "Na Bulovce Hospital" = ":cs:Nemocnice Na Bulovce" = Bulovka Hospital and editing the article accordingly. -- The Anome (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to confirm that they are one and the same. -- The Anome (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   "Na Bulovce Hospital" 

message: Neither Valčík nor Opálka were present to the assassination. This is only a myth. Some time before the assassination gestapo shot and killed a member the resistance group Three Kings Václav Morávek and gained a picture of Valčík from his jacket. Even though Valčík's identity was unknown he was intensively wanted by the gestapo. --94.112.58.39 (talk) 09:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to the proper place on the TP.  Do you have a reliable source and page number for your claim? 50.111.63.109 (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The myth of Valčík's and Opálka's presence 

message: There are several paragraphs scattered throughout the article that have no citations whatsoever. Specifically, in the following sections:
* The attack in Prague
* Reprisals
* Investigation and manhunt
* Political consequence and aftermath
* Memorials
Furthermore, the "Portrayals in literature and popular culture" section has only one reference. —howcheng  {chat} 08:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just add "" to each of these sections? Most editors are not going to look at the talk page. WolfmanSF (talk) 15:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Having the big orange maintenance tag makes it easier for me when selecting articles for WP:Selected anniversaries. I leave the talk page message so that article watchers will understand what the problem areas are. Thanks. —howcheng  {chat} 16:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article needs more references 

message: Hi, Honzula. I don't know why :File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) wounded Heydrich.jpg, a film screenshot of an actor portraying Reinhard Heydrich in the film Operation Daybreak, is used in the article about the actual event, Operation Anthropoid. The usage in the article is invalid because the article is not about a film. I'm unsure whether it belongs in the other article about the film, but the DVD cover of the film is adequate enough, isn't it? --George Ho (talk) 22:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It use in this article was improper.  The user acted in good faith, but by the user's own admission, they are very unfamiliar with fair use rules for images.  I think the image was placed in this article to "save it" from being deleted as an orphaned image.  Sadly, doesn't work that way. -O.R.Comms 13:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is exactly as O.R. wrote. As this image is not my favorite, I'll make no more attempt to save it. --Honzula (talk) 11:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  That means, Honzula, that you don't mind having it deleted, right? If so, may you or I add the  manually or via Twinkle? --George Ho (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry for late reply, but yes, it is right that you did it. --Honzula (talk) 05:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Anton Diffring (Operation Daybreak, 1975) wounded Heydrich.jpg]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Operation Anthropoid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026034423/http://www.praguemonitor.com/en/183/czech_national_news/12882/ to http://www.praguemonitor.com/en/183/czech_national_news/12882/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: If you doubt his general reputation for efficiency, you might try a Google search of "Heydrich efficient" and peruse the results. For a specific source, look at this one; within it, you will find the statement, "So ruthless and efficient were his methods that he earned nicknames like ‘The Butcher of Prague, The Hangman, and the Blond Beast." I honestly don't see the need to provide a citation for his efficiency in the article. WolfmanSF (talk) 01:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heydrich's efficiency 

message: The section on the Moravec family needs some clarification regarding who is related to whom in what way. For example, how are any of them related to Frantisek Moravec? Ishboyfay (talk) 23:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moravec family 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The sentence "Jsme Češi! Nikdy se nevzdáme se, slyšíte? Nikdy!" is a direct quote from the reference below at https://www.lidovky.cz/relax/lide/jsme-cesi-nikdy-se-nevzdame-volali-parasutiste-pred-smrti.A120525_183216_lide_mc . The phrase "Jsme Češi! Nikdy se nevzdáme, slyšíte? Nikdy!" does not appear in the source. I don't speak Czech, so I don't know if that's good grammar, but we can't change a quotation. What am I missing? SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote from lidovky.cz 

message: I seem to recall that the erasure of the towns Lidice and Ležáky was previously mentioned in this but is not mentioned at all, except in very vague terms.   Wikipedia has a separate article on Lidice and there should be a link here.
184.63.25.57 (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Annihilation of Lidice and Ležáky 

message: Hello, I have some photos about the assassination (a 1942 German police investigation file with amazing photos of the car and site) and if a wikipedia editor can have a look and maybe enrich the page with those interesting photos. Please contact me. Dorit agmon (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New material