Talk:Louise of Sweden

message: *The long panel box overwhelms the formatting of the information in this article. Perhaps it doesn't matter...--Wetman (talk) 02:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box 

message: Move Parsecboy (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh; in the beginning of the article, her name-forms are presented in Swedish. Please remember, that in Swedish, she was Lovisa and not Louise, so the current form are not correct. --85.226.44.74 (talk) 13:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Excellent, I have no problem with this. I'm glad I could help! --85.226.44.74 (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh and generally: Swedish name forms often end with an "a", and Danish with an "e"; as you see, in Swedish she was EugeniA and JosefinA, and in Danish EugeniE JosephinE. Just a remarc I couldn't help adding! --85.226.44.74 (talk) 15:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I'd say she is more notable as Louise of Sweden than Louise Mountbatten. When the latter is called "Louise of Sweden", there is usually "Queen" in front of it, while simply "Louise of Sweden" almost always refers to this woman. Surtsicna (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for me. Parsecboy (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move to Louise of Sweden 

message: Move or Don't move followed by reason and ~~~~
Move This queen is known as Louise in English (the only relevant language when it comes to this Wikipedia), Danish (language of the country she was queen of), and Swedish (language of her homeland), therefore I have no idea why this article is called Lovisa of Sweden. Surtsicna (talk) 21:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I am from Scandinavia, and I have no opinion in which name to use here, but if it could help, I´ll tell you which names are used for her: Her Swedish name was Lovisa, which is always used in Sweden (and that should of course be stated to be her original name-form in the article); when she moved to Denmark, she was called Louise. Perhaps that could help!--85.226.44.74 (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh; in the beginning of the article, her name-forms are presented in Swedish. Please remember, that in Swedish, she was Lovisa and not Louise, so the current form are not correct. --85.226.44.74 (talk) 13:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Excellent, I have no problem with this. I'm glad I could help! --85.226.44.74 (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh and generally: Swedish name forms often end with an "a", and Danish with an "e"; as you see, in Swedish she was EugeniA and JosefinA, and in Danish EugeniE JosephinE. Just a remarc I couldn't help adding! --85.226.44.74 (talk) 15:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I'd say she is more notable as Louise of Sweden than Louise Mountbatten. When the latter is called "Louise of Sweden", there is usually "Queen" in front of it, while simply "Louise of Sweden" almost always refers to this woman. Surtsicna (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for me. Parsecboy (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Lovisa (her post-1900 legal name) did not belong to the same dynasty as her husband - people only belong to one dynasty or branch thereof. Lovisa was a Bernadotte. Dynasty or house inclusion (and thus WP categorization) depend wholly on accepted genealogy. It seems to me that WP should not be permeated with personal POV that is not accurate. I am very unhappy about one other user in this regard, in particular, who keeps categorizing royal women as if they belong to their husband's dynasties where they (most of them) do not. I corrected that in this case with what I felt was a clear enough edit summary, but that editor reversed the correction without discussion. Invite opinions of others please as I revert it back to what is correct again, according to such reliable authorities as Burke's and Debrett's. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war neeeded re: dynasty? 

message: I think something has been literally lost in translation here:
Louise with her beloved sister-in-law Princess Thyra of Denmark with whom she had a confidently friendship.
Confidently friendship? Doesn't make sense. Additionally, the article states Louise did not get along with her sister-in-law. ScarletRibbons (talk) 04:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. That text is not neutral, so it should be removed in any case. I will do so.--Aciram (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Caption 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Louise of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140208201408/http://kongehuset.dk/english/the-royal-house to http://kongehuset.dk/english/The-Royal-House
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article says she was disliked by her mother in law and sister in law. She had three sisters in law, though, so which one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which sister in law?