Talk:DJ Sharaz

message: Why does this keep getting deleted? ~
:It does not meet the notability criteria for musicians. Radiodef (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding these templates is not a form of vandalism. By contrast, removing an AFD template is disruptive and you can not do that. Radiodef (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is getting ridiculous. You've provided no suggestions for improvement, only entire removal. The reason your flag keeps getting removed is due to the fact you are not doing much in the way of research. Look up the artist on MTV.com perhaps? Pandora or Spotify? In the future, it would be more constructive to provide examples of what you consider to be "self-promoting", rather than suggesting the entire article be nuked. This article has been here longer than you have been a Wikipedia member. Also, if you are going to object so vehemently to the inclusion of this artist's name on an unauthorized photo wrongly tagged as Creative Commons, please either attribute the photo, or remove this artist's likeness from the wiki electronic dance music page and replace it with something/someone else.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.9.22.244 (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggestions for improvement: find a single, reliable, third party reference of something that this DJ has done notable. 
1. Reference #2 is broken.
2. Reference #3 is a CD tracklist, with one remix by the said artist.
3. Reference #4 and #5 mention him in a long list, but doesn't provide with any information that this artist has done anything notable.
4. Reference #6: see reference #3.
5. Reference #7 is an image that doesn't even mention DJ Sharaz.
6. Reference #8 is the ONLY source that can even be considered reputable, but not enough that I personally think it can justify an entire article about the person, much less the picture placed on the EDM page for sole self-promotion, when there are many more notable EDM DJ's with photos from the Creative Commons that would be more beneficial to the article.
7. The final reference is just a link to the artist's Soundcloud.
And finally, you can't remove flags. ṜedMarkViolinistDrop me a line 08:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

text: I hate to break it to you, but placing a PROD tag is not vandalizing.I do however, suggest you read . ṜedMarkViolinistDrop me a line 22:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: RedMarkViolinist

message: Consider this my objection to deletion. To say this performer is not notable is a little heavy handed.
67.190.202.71 (talk) 01:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have rationale that's not basically your opinion, please bring it to the the deletion discussion. Radiodef (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection to Deletion 

message: I would like to know who we readers can contact with regard to RadioDef and RedMarkViolin and their earlier vandalism of this page. I'd still like to find out if 1) they are both the same individual and 2) why they didn't reinstate relevant information they gratuitously deleted for no reason whatsoever. I guess we will have to reinstate this ourselves? These two wasted a lot of peoples' valuable time and I really hope there's some kind of a reporting system within WP for editor behavior. Not a WP expert so any help will be appreciated as I'd really like to pursue this. Thank you. 108.9.22.244 (talk) 20:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Defacement and contact information, please..