Talk:Archelaus of Macedon

message: :Image:Archelaus I.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Archelaus I.jpg

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Archelaus I of Macedon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20031101133153/http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com:80/~jamesdow/s022/f236099.htm to http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jamesdow/s022/f236099.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello. I'm pretty new to editing on Wikipedia, so please bear with me if I unwittingly make some kind of mistake. I'm here to talk about the unhistorical nature of a few Macedonian 'kings' and why their wiki pages need to be altered and/or removed. @Eejit43 
mentioned that we should first discuss the changes to the page on Archelaus I and I think that's a good idea. Anyways, the issue is that Archelaus II was never the king of Macedonia (de facto or de jure). I have not found a single source from modern scholarship that supports the idea that he was king (I'll paste all references with relevant page numbers below). He does not appear on any modern list of kings. Moreover, as far as I have read, Archelaus I never had a son named Archelaus (Roisman 158). Amyntas III did have a son named Archelaus, but he was never king.                                                                                                                                                 
In other words, the correct succession order (insofar that our sources argue) should be: Perdiccas II-Archelaus I-Orestes-Aeropus II-Amyntas II-Pausanias-Amyntas III. There is some wiggle room here (it's a chaotic period with very few surviving accounts), but Archelaus II was never king. Additionally, Alcetas, brother of Perdiccas II, was previously included as king on his wiki page, but that is also unhistorical for the same reasons as Archelaus (i.e. no mention/inclusion whatsoever by modern scholars). This issue does have some precedent on Wikipedia. Crateuas, Archelaus I's possible killer, was also included as king until someone (rightfully) removed him. I've only written so much because these claims date all the way back to 2008 with the page's creation and are unfortunately repeated on other language wikis.
I propose removing all mention of Archelaus II and Alcetas II as kings of Macedonia. I'll also post this to the Archelaus II page.
References:
# Eder, Walter; Renger, Johannes, eds. (2006). Chronologies of the Ancient World: Names, Dates, and Dynasties. Boston: Brill. pp. 188–190.
# Morby, John (1989). Dynasties of the World: A Chronological and Genealogical Handbook. Oxford University Press. pp. 29–30.
# Roisman, Joseph (2010). "Classical Macedonia to Perdiccas III". In Roisman, Joseph; Worthington, Ian (eds.). A Companion to Ancient Macedonia. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 158.
# Errington, R. Malcolm (1990). A History of Macedonia. University of California Press. p. 251–253.
# Hammond, N.G.L. (1979). A History of Macedonia Volume II: 550-336 B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 167–169.
# Strootman, Rolf (2014). Courts and Elites in the Hellenistic Empires: The Near East After the Achaemenids, c. 330 to 30 BCE Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. p. xiv–xv.
BusterTheMighty (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archelaus II and Alcetas II