Talk:PlayStation Portable/Archive 3

message: this page needs to be checked for its facts (seagate dose not make game systems,it uses usb not
a coax cable and wifi not gsm). I fixed the last two but i fear this page has been messed up by this stuff or some one is not doing there homework before editing jmccabe871 12:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more likely to be sneaky vandalism that went unnoticed. Sockatume 12:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  facts 

message: I do not believe Sony would press pornography onto UMDs - and currently only Sony can manufacture. Please give source. Lmnt 15:53, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google search reveals , , and . -- ReyBrujo 16:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UMD Movies 

message: If you find any download able demos for the PSP or find out that your local EBGAMES/Gamestop is giving them out please post this info in the article. It will help everyone looking to get a taste of free stuff.Shamo0 02:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: **The PSP Demo stand alone article**

message: I was curious, what is the whole Network Gaming thing on this site:
https://www.yourgamingname.com
Has anyone used this for anything? I signed up and everything anyway, but I'm not too sure why and what it is. Can anyone give me details on what its for etc.? Thanks :) --JJMan 16:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification Lmnt 15:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Network Gaming?

message: This article says GTA: Liberty City Stories is the top selling game, but the Need for Speed article says NFS: Undreground Rivals is. Which one is correct? BackInBlack 12:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GTA is the best selling, Need for speed use to be though. Jedi6-(need help?) 05:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  top-selling article? 

message: Could a comparison picture of the psp vs. the ds lite be produced for the page? Or at least a picture showing more similar onscreen images?
I've got DevHook on my PSP with the screen capture module, so I'll expand the Devhook article at some point with info on the screen capture mod and provide some screenshots for the article and animated gif's using the screen capture's video tool. When I'll do this I don't know, I got a busy week ahead of me, but I'll try and get this done sometime in the next week or two. Huds601 10:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparison picture 

message: I reverted to remove the following:
This is an update by a PSP Senior Owner, known as spartan878 or spartan108, on April 21, 2006. The paragraph including the new features of PSP Firmware Version 3.0 are fake. There was a photoshopped picture made by an unknown user, that made the fake 3.0 picture. It would be GREAT to have an email program, paint, an organizer, that is my PSP dream! But, it is not true, the paragraph ABOVE THAT is true: At the PlayStation Briefing conference on March 15, 2006 in Japan, Sony revealed plans for future firmware updates to include Macromedia Flash software and enhanced RSS support for internet radio with later updates providing support for streaming RSS video. Future updates will also add Video and Voiceover Communication via IP support, using the upcoming PSP EyeToy Camera. Other additions will include GPS and Camera support and additional language fonts.
--Mwongozi 23:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to remove talk-like content 

message: Is there anything one can buy for the PSP and another system that would allow one to view games and PSP movies on a normal television? I'm thinking the Gamecube's Gameboy Advance player in spirit, here. Rockhound 02:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that Lik Sang offer such a device, no development kit required, see  --Oscarthecat 20:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but that's just a camera in a box. =) However, it does accomplish Rockhound's goal.  Thanks for the link --mboverload@ 21:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

text: You're right, but is there anything officially licensed by Sony? I'm really nervous about getting a PSP, and then doing this, and somehow voiding warranties or what have you. Rockhound 01:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Television Hook-Up/Interface?

message: Too long. Please rewrite.--BajillionGremlin 23:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's getting there. Dancter 15:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The homebrew and the UMD movie sections are definitely too long.  They've got their own sub-articles, so the section in this article should just be one or two sentences.  Certainly doesn't warrant a breakdown of firmware A / B / C etc. --Oscarthecat 20:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too long

message: One of the new changes is "A new file extension has been added to playable AAC formats."
:This is very cryptic, and no websites seem to explain what it is. My guess is that AAC files in MP4 containers with the M4A extension works now. Tested it with some unmodified iTunes files and it worked. Now, I forgot to check it before updating. Does M4As play in 2.60?
::If that's what this change is about, then something could be said about Sony trying to move in on iPod territory directly. 137.158.128.105 00:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ^Trust me Sony cant move in on ipod territory, PSP is a horrible mp3 player. It is very big and, frankly, hard to use.  Also it is haevy the only thing going for it is it has speakers, which imo should be on ipods. And I have no idea wat AAC is.Qwerasdfzxcvvcxz 22:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2.7 Firmware update

message: "By the end of March 2006, 17.3 million units of the PSP had been shipped[1], however the number of units sold is unknown (Sony does not publish sales figures). It is, however known to be considerably less than the number sold for it's main rival, the Nintendo DS. The Nintendo DS has sold over 16 million units, as stated by George Harrison at the 2006 E3 Expo."
17.3 million units shipped which is considerably less than the DS which sold 16 million?  Contradictions right in the same sentence are never a good thing.  I took this whole statement out until someone gets acurate figures. Malamockq 06:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Shipped" is not the same as "sold." Read in context, it makes sense. Sony knows how many were shipped, but not how many were sold. They only know that it was less than 16M." 207.30.169.168 10:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: There is no need to have a link to the Japanese website, this Wikipedia is English. And PlayStation Portable has its own US and EU website which are both official. So why link to a site which only a handful of people  reading this Wiki will be able to even get anything out of? Havok (T/C/c) 11:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The english site is not just a mirror of the japanese one, both are independant. Usually the japanese shows information about firmware upgrades and new games and conventions weeks before the english ones get that it. There is also information that is not available in the english ones, like the PlayStation.Spot (which I notice is not even mentioned in the article). We can see what others think about having that link. My opinion is that it is a reliable source of information, but if nobody want it, remove it. -- ReyBrujo 11:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's in english, sure, keep it. But if it's Japanese what use is it? If people want more information in japanese, they visit ja.wikipedia.org, and most likely they know about the japanese website. There is absolutly no reason to keep this link. Havok (T/C/c) 09:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As you wish. Consensus is what makes Wikipedia so great. -- ReyBrujo 14:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should have this link in. --Timmywimmy 01:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese link 

message: Seeing as this section has it's own article, is there really any need for it to be so big? It could be cut down to one paragraph explaining what it means and then redirect people to the homebrew article. Havok (T/C/c) 09:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly agree.  The length of this section probably dates back to before it received its own article.  I'll happily chop it down. --John D'Adamo 15:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homebrew section 

message: The article mentions that is uses a figure eight plug. Is that actually the IEC connector C7 plug? 
If yes, then change the text and link it. 71.199.123.24 07:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My PSP uses the figure 8 plug. --Thaddius 15:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  figure of eight plug 

message: I've noticed that a lot of the spiel to do with firmware is inconsistent.  For example:
* "firmware version 2.7"
* "Firmware 2.71"
* "firmware v2.60"
* "update 2.50"
...and so on.  I think we should use some sort of standard format, such as whether to have a "v" at the start.  Personally, I think "firmware version x.xx" is easier to understand, and then "firmware x.xx" could be used from thereon.
If nobody objects, I'll go through and update all occurences so at least we have some sort of standard naming convention. --Tim1988 talk 13:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be nice. I usually tag articles or sections with the :Template:Update tag to get someone who knows about the topic update it. -- ReyBrujo 13:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: The psp has had support for png image format since firmware 1.0 but only as background images in the game section of the xmb, for instance the save game files. The photo section only supported it with 2.0. I cant figure out how to write this into the article though.Atirage 04:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PNG image format in firmware 

message: Something really needs to be done about the constant vandalism on this article. Seemingly, virtually all edits these days are just vandalism attempts. I would suggest blocking edits by anonymous or newly-registered users, just as the PS3 article has, as they are the vast majority of the vandels. ZakuSage 18:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Should something about this ad be added to the article? Havok (T/C/c) 21:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the Criticisms could get a note about the controversy the ads are having (the jump one in the subway, and the white ad). -- ReyBrujo 21:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Because they AREN'T racial stereotypes. Just because a cartoon character might have an accent doesn't mean in any way that said character is depicting a stereotype- it just means that the actor who did the VA for said character happens to have that accent. To attempt to force from the airwaves (in that vein) anyone who speaks with an accent- now THAT would be racist. We're talking about squirrels and fluff here, not cartoon versions of aunt mam. Ex-Nintendo Employee 02:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSP White ad 

message: Hey people; many homebrew fans out there have been adding criticism to this article due to PSP's firmware upgrades and edits about it keep being reverted, this leads us to a choice, to either have Sony allow homebrew on future firmware, or to protect the article from editors on Wikipedia?  What shall it be? --Nintendude  message  16:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the most recent edits to the criticism section due to them being unsourced POVs. I would entirely prefer to remove the criticism section as it shouldn't be found in an encyclopedia in the first place, but would not want to do something as contraversial as that. Any thoughts? ZakuSage 02:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing sourced criticism would be a blatant violation of WP:NPOV.  I could see how some points could be broken up into the article itself (the first two).  I think those two first points should be intergrated into the article itself.  The White PSP ad should be in a new section titled "Controversey." Put that other ad campaign (the graffiti-like ads) in that section as well. Hbdragon88 22:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  reverted claims of criticism 

message: Should we make a list of the PSP Gamesharing games? --Ideal4real 05:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I just did it myself. --Ideal4real 05:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the last paragraph explaining some Games that feature Gamesharing; I figured there was no need for this since I made a whole article about it.--Ideal4real 18:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gamesharing 

message: An anon attempted to add several sales charts to the page, which gives an incorrect perception-
* First of all, the charts are outdated- Note the link to some site called "VGCharts" he mentioned, whose shipment data is woefully old. That site still says PSP shipments in the US are 6.39 million. Actual Sony shipments for the US stand at 8.17 million. Japan's shipments according to that site are 4.70M, while the actual numbers are 5.2 million. 
* Conversely, that site he gave ("VGCharts") as a reference isn't correct on the DS either (it gives total shipments worldwide at only 16.73 million). Of course he doesn't mention that at all in his edit. Instead he switches gears to an entirely DIFFERENT site for the DS numbers, in order to give Nintendo's system a much higher total of 20 million units.
* Lastly, he completely omits European sales data altogether, leaving the number as a "?", despite the fact that it's a major part of worldwide sales.
I've reverted it. Ex-Nintendo Employee 01:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSP "sales" chart 

message: I added the greatest hits lineup. It's accurate and acceptable to my standards. Feel free to edit if neccasary or whenever it gets outdated.--Shamo0 06:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you deleted the List of PlayStation Portable games in the process.--Ideal4real 00:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited it and put up a whole list for ya.--Ideal4real 05:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some idiot deleted the page. That took me a long time to make!--Ideal4real 15:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so you know, I didn't delete anything ^.^; I'm not saying you're blaming me but just incase anyone else thinks I did I didn't.Shamo0 18:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I know who did it. It was this guy named Crumbsucker.--Ideal4real 19:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it. Whew! that was a lot of backtracking. I thought I lost it forever. Crumbsucker, if you're gonna do that, then please, talk to us first. That list is helpful because not only does it detatch from the "Already cluttered" Sony list, it shows the prices in what region. So next time, do us all a favor and before you edit, talk to us OK?--Ideal4real 02:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh my GOD! He did it again! You know what? Since my contributions here on Wikipedia goes unnoticed, i'm not bringing it back anymore. I tried to settle this in a calm, respectful manner, but I just can't do it anymore. Y'all just gonna sit there and let that guy edit anything he wants, right? Fine, I won't contribute to anymore lists on the PSP. How 'bout that?--Ideal4real 03:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatest Hits section 

message: I refreshed it to how it was 1 week ago. I included the List of PlayStation Portable games and other things. Please leave it be, it's not hurting anyone, so let it stay.--Ideal4real 05:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhm... Why didn't you just take the List of PlayStation Portable games and put it into the article? Ex-Nintendo Employee 05:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I figured it should get it's own, you know, little space. If you think changing it will benefit it, the go ahead, be my guest. Ideal4real 18:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original PSP Page 

message: The "Wireless networking" section needs a lot of attending to. I removed a bit about the PSP supporting JavaScript because its Java support was uncertain, because the two are related only by name and are used in completely different situations, and I edited "Java Script" to Java. There's a lot of remaining "citation needed", too. --Spug 18:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wireless networking 

message: "the P!nk PSP Value Pack will cost €2290, or £1690"
Is this true?! Those prices are outrageous! Perhaps a zero needs to be knocked off the end? Xzamuel 19:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  P!nk pack price 

message: Someone spammed the page with Crickeys in honor of the late Steve Irwin. While it's a nice homage, it is blatant spam. I reverted it back to the one before it. Mahare 00:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted

message: I have removed the Piracy section because there is piracy evident on EVERY major console, and yet none (aside from dreamcast) have sections on it. Additionally, the information was extremely out of date, only containing information relevent as of greater then a year ago. ZakuSage 17:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Piracy Section

message: The criticism section makes reference to Wired referring to the PSP and getting MP3s onto it as "Nightmarishly Hard" -- yet on the page linked in the reference I can find no such quote -- it's possible the linked ref has changed since that text was added.  Zero sharp 21:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an overstatement whether it actually came from Wired or not- it is quite simple getting mp3s onto the PSP.  A child could do it. John D'Adamo 22:16, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed the quote.  The link in the ref is now dead (which it wasn't before).  If anyone wishes to contest my removal, plz. discuss it here -- I'm more than willing to be wrong. Zero sharp 05:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nightmarishly Hard"

message: The tech specs needs some cleaning up to be done.  Kind of like the one for the Nintendo DS.
Spareus151 17:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Specs

message: I feel http://pspupdates.qj.net should be added as an external link, as it seems to have accurate, up to date news regarding the PSP and Homebrew developments. Huds601 10:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: There is an error on the Units Sold in the info box, it is actually saying the number of units shipped. Either put the actual units sold in there or change the info box to units shipped, but even with the latter it wont be consistant with other hardware articles that list units sold JayKeaton 21:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sony doesn't release "Units Sold", but rather units shipped. All other numbers are considered estimates at best, and are therefore unrelyable. This is consistant with PS1, PS2, and most probably PS3 in the future. - ZakuSage 03:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, for consoles as old as the ps2 and ps1 it seems reasonable, but for the PSP it seems a little questionable. I guess it's still a good indication of physically how many psps are in the world JayKeaton 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Error on page

message: I've removed the Sales and competition section, as it largely contains out of date information presented in a poor manner. Additionally, most of the information the section tries to get forth can essentially be found by just looking at the infoboxes for PSP and DS. - ZakuSage 00:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be put back in, but the information should be redone as it's now a bit outdated and badly organized. Arkhiver 08:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah it should go back, but have no PSPvsDS crap, like how the DS doesn't have PSPvsDS crap in it's S&C. Hijak 03:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section "Sales and competition"

message: On the official site there are downloads for certain games (like soccer and Loco Roco). Are these downloads free? If they are, should this be incorporated into the article? Also, are the Firmware updates free?
:The game demos are free, as are the firmware updates. Both are already included in the article. - ZakuSage 01:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Downloads

message: PlayStation Portable is the 572nd most popular page on Wikipedia. (PlayStation 2 is #518, PlayStation 3 is #11, PlayStation is #314, List of PlayStation 3 games is #727) Nothing else on the PSP disambig page is on the top 1000. People looking for PSP are looking for PlayStation Portable, nothing else. Stop the madness! PSP must redirect to PlayStation Portable. Johnsonsjohnson 11:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not EVERYBODY is looking for Playstation Portable when they look up PSP...I initially looked up PSP because I was looking for the article on Paintshop Pro.  There're too many articles that PSP could stand for for it to redirect to just one.  It's not a big deal to have to click a link after you look it up...You can just look up PlayStation Portable if you want to get right to the article. Rzrscm 14:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSP MUST redirect to PlayStation Portable 

message: The photo at the top of the article is NOT a Sony PSP. Aleister93 16:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And for 21 minutes no less... - ZakuSage 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Photo 

message: Shouldn't the title of the article be "PSP" rather than "PlayStation Portable"? The "IBM" article isn't titled "International Business Machines", I don't see why this should be titled "PlayStation Portable", especially when it is not referred to under that title. I mean, the words "PlayStation Portable" aren't even present on the console itself. I think the title of the article should be changed to "PSP". --Psa- 20:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a point, nor are the words present on the console's box or Quick Reference Guide (not sure about the phonebook of a manual), at least in North America. However, in Europe it does appear on the box and in advertising, and on firmwares 2.XX+ it does whenever you launch a game or application. Precident at least shows that PS2's article title is PlayStation 2, and not PS2, same with PS3. - ZakuSage 22:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name 

message: I remember rumors that the PSP could be used as a PS3 controller, for such things as discreet play selection in Madden, rearview mirror in driving games, etc.  Do any current PS3 games ship with this enabled? LeoO3 23:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  As PS3 controller? 

message: i started add info now its gone!
:First, please sign your posts using four tildes (these: ~). Second, the article in the past has been over-run by listing firmware features, and they have been briefly summarized (the most notable ones) in the firmware section. - ZakuSage 20:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: why has someone deleted more info on PSP 3.0?

message: does anyone knows where i can find a PMF to AVI converter please? same for an AT3 to MP3 (or just a Windows based AT3 player)? thank you. Wikiprout 02:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject, as it says at the top of this page. You also might want to try adding posts to the talk page by using the + next to "edit this page" rather then editing the previous entry in the talk page (it's deceptive to people going through the history). - ZakuSage 16:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PMF2AVI & AT32MP3

message: Is the PSP region free? GrimRepr39 01:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be mentioned in the article. I believe that the games are region free but the UMD movies are not. --Thaddius 18:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: Somebody has put that the 3.02 firmware is out. Although this is not true.I have changed it to 3.01 as it currently is now.If it changes then somebody will have to change it to the newer firmware --Aaronsingh 17:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a PSP, and when I go to network update, it downloads 3.02. Check Kotaku.com. I'm changing it back to 3.02 becuase I think turning a PSP on and seeing 3.02 is proof enough. Cmsjustin 18:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also if you need a citation, theres an article on pspfanboy.com today about it. I saw it through my RSS reader, but I can't get a link right now because my company blocks gaming sites. Cmsjustin 18:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3.02 firmware 

message: Changed almost everything —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.75.35.115 (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  someone just vandalized it! 

message: Specifically, why the sentence: 
"Once the corporate origins of the site were discovered angry posters rebuked Sony, it's corporate culture, and how they felt at being so blatently manipulated." 
has been flagged as NPOV. I realise this sentence needs referencing, and i am happy to as sson as someone shows me how!
This sentence is NOT my POV. it is an accurate reflection of over 500 posts using those exact words in the comments section of the site in question. Happy to discuss. 
```` —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 222.152.220.172 (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Weasel words, blatant slant for starters. It's also quite unnecessary to the information at hand. Look at the article Hitler; it does not say "he is a very evil man" despite what popular opinion may be. Wikipedia is not a place for opinions. - ZakuSage 00:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

text: It doesn't matter if it's your opinion or not; it is still an opinion taking a POV and contains a number of weasel words as I have already outlined. Wikipedia is supposed to leave the reader to form their own opinions, not to force them on the reader. - 
ZakuSage 02:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I added more about the backlash, again without giving a POV. "come under scrutiny by some members of the online gaming community" is a much more neurtal line than "Once the corporate origins of the site were discovered posters rebuked Sony and their corporate culture." And please, sign your posts. - ZakuSage 02:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Again, you still can't seem to get this: it's a statement of the opinions of these people, which doesn't belong on an encyclopedia. - ZakuSage 20:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: This is not a journal. This is not the bastion of all information that has ever passed through the net. It is a collaborative effort encyclopedia that stresses containing a neutral point of view. - ZakuSage 22:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial Advertising - Discussion 

message: Why do we include so much pricing information?  Isn't that a bit too salesy for an encyclopedia article? Maybe include the base or release prices for historical references (to compare with gameboy's original pricing, for example), but tracking the current prices in every country and prices for all the many different accessory packs just wastes space.  If anything, it should be a separate section lower on the page and expressed as a compact and readable chart. If no one objects in a few days I'll start making the edits. Crimson117 21:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it shouldn't take up so much space in the general prose. Perhaps we could arrange it in a similar fashion to the Playstation 2 article? - ZakuSage 02:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why include price information? 

message: Is RSS talked about at all through this whole article??? the psp can save channels, and get music videos and pictures from RSS channels(no text rss yet though)
:It isn't at the moment, but remember to be bold in editing and feel free to add it yourself. - ZakuSage 01:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSS 

message: The wording "According to Sony, they are paying businesses and building owners for the right to graffiti their walls" seems suitable, although was changed earlier to paint instead of graffiti.  Paint seems rather generic and vague, and the article referenced refers to it as graffiti. Is reverted for now, appreciate any thoughts. --Oscarthecat 21:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article for graffiti, "Graffiti [...] is defined as being "a drawing or writing scratched on a wall or other surface [...] When done without the property owner's consent, graffiti is a form of vandalism". So seems a suitible word since it can still be graffiti without being vandalism. - ZakuSage 01:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graffiti 

message: NO where in this article does it talk about the kind of picture formats the psp can save and view....how can ppl who own psp's work on an article about it and not include so many things...ima add it right now —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deananoby2 (talk • contribs) 
:Not only did you not put it in a useful section, it's a list (which should be avoided) of just what is to be expected when you say photo formats. - ZakuSage 01:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability for one. This console supports a god damn lot of things, and listing them all would just be a poor read and turn the article to crap. Also, please sign your posts. - ZakuSage 17:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Please remain civil. Insulting other users on the talk page is so far the only contribution you've made to this article, and it is not a productive one I might add. If you have something interesting to add, add it and source it. Otherwise, let it go. --Thaddius 04:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSP: PHOTO