lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Malahide railway station

message: Interesting and possible creditable claims on this page: . Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-reading this again (its Osgood's blog who is somewhat of an SME) it goes some way to explaining the date discrepencies that have been worrying me about the station and station house; and I've somewhat WP:TROUTing myself for not re-reading it earlier.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Maximum Fighting Championship

message: * I am going to remove the generic info that is on this page.  People can read that info under the unified rules page. --Clausewitz01 (talk) 12:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

message: Much of the information on this page is cited to the MFC rules webpage. That webpage no longer exists, thus the link provided is broken. As this provides four separate citations on this page this is kind of a big deal and a solution should be found.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Navan Road Parkway railway station

message: If anybody knows when this stations opens, please let me know on my talk page - I initially misread the timetable, giving my original opening date. The nearest official comment I can find is this one -  in response to a question by John H about Phoenix Park Station opening, the answer given is "Autumn 2007". Autarch (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Various sources give the proposed opening date as "late 2007" (obviously passed), and "early 2008". Other sources (like the one you note) are more specific, giving dates in August 07, January 19th 08, and January 21st 08. The most convincing one I saw noted that it will open at the same time that the new "Maynooth / Longford IrishRail commuter services" are launched. FYI: As well as the timetable already showing PPark, I read a note that the destination board in Connolly, the automated audio announcement system, and the stop ticker above train doors are already annoucing the station as a stop - Even though it's not actually open yet. Therefore I'd say it might simply be safer to wait until it's officially opened. (And then list the "was opened on" date. Rather than a "expected to be opened date".) Guliolopez (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the advice, much appreciated. Autarch (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening of station
Talk:Laks (Caucasus)

message: The sources are in Russian, I am working on inserting the appropriate citations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.206.228.30 (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1. Shouldn't the name be changed from Lak people (Dagestan) to Lak people (Caucasus)?
2. Where the information came from about Lak people living in Iraq and speaking Kurdish? Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Some issues

message: The anthropology section is based on the discredited idea of a north Caucasian race or genetic group. 80.40.13.205 (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthropology
Talk:Lieutenant Governor of Delaware

message: Apparently there is no mechanism for filling this office if it is vacated?  When Denn succeeded Beau Biden as Attorney General, the Senate was presided over by a president pro tem, but seemingly no one became Lieutenant Governor, "acting", "interim" or otherwise?  Is this correct?  If so, it is similar to Vice President of the United States prior to the ratification of the 25th Amendment in that when the Vice President succeeded to the Presidency, then no one was Vice President until the next election.  If this is the case, the article probably should explicitly state this.2600:1004:B1C0:741A:0:0:1D6B:5F01 (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vacancy
Talk:Sutton railway station (Ireland)

message: The station didn't close in 1959. This date relates to the termination of the Howth Tram service. The re-opening date in 1973 is also incorrect; that appears to be the date that the new Bayside station was opened. I'll fix the incorrect info for Howth station as well. jxm (talk) 03:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks - those were awkward errors. SeoR (talk) 08:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No closure in 1959
Talk:Anna Livia Bridge

message: The Anna Livia (Chapelizod) Bridge does not carry local traffic from Blanchardstown or Clonsilla.  It's part of the former N4 (prior to that T3) route, whose suburbs west of Chapelizod are Palmerstown, Lucan, Leixlip, Celbridge, Maynooth, Kilcock et cetera.  You can reach Chapelizod from Clonsilla and Blanchardstown, but you'd have to go via Castleknock (for the latter) or Luttrellstown and Porterstown (for the former) and go via Martin's Row; you won't cross the bridge in either case.
70.105.207.100 (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Clonsilla and Blanchardstown"?
Talk:East-Link (Dublin)

message: All the links in the references section are broken...72.229.107.153 (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And 18 months later they still are! Sarah777 (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: But no longer......Sarah777 (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: I missed the discussion, I suppose, but I don't see that this is in any way the common name. I know no one who uses this name - people and media call it the East Link still... SeoR (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed . I came here to open the same thread. I also don't agree that "Tom Clarke Bridge" is (yet) the common name. National news articles, mentioning the subject, were using the term "East Link bridge" as recently as this month. Local and national news outlets, about the subject, were using the term "East Link" mid- and late last year. "Tom Clarke Bridge" is perhaps becoming more common. But not to the extent that it is yet the most common term. Happy to have the discussion. But, IMO, the move was perhaps premature... Guliolopez (talk) 20:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Exactly.  Likewise, Transport Infrastructure Ireland currently uses East-Link (), as does paper-of-record the Irish Times even beyond the examples above (), and the City Council to which it belongs (), though I am sure the Council also uses the new name. At least there should be a discussion, and we should stick to WP:COMMONNAME. SeoR (talk) 22:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  . It's been over a month. I haven't noted any other thoughts in the interim. Unless there are other inputs, I'm inclined to move the page "back" (essentially to undo the unilateral and unheralded move). If there is a subsequent move proposal, then the contributor proposing the move can trigger the move request/discussion process themselves. Guliolopez (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  , I fully agree.  I have been watching, and have seen no use of this term, where I hear and see the old name several times a week.  It's almost a pity, as the bridge personal names are more human, and East Link is functional, but it is the factual main name for now, and the encyclopedia records, not defines.  And process wise, this was mishandled, so I'd fully support reversion for the time being. SeoR (talk) 09:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  . OK. I've moved it "back". If anyone feels strongly enough (that the new/official name has replaced the old/official name to the extent that it is now the common name), then they can open an RM. Or just another discussion thread here. (Otherwise, from what I can see, reliable sources (as recently as today/yesterday) continue to use "East-Link" as the common name. And/or to assume that that is what their readers call the subject themselves). Guliolopez (talk) 10:31, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name / move discussion
Talk:Islandbridge

message: The article should cover the Viking Burial site between Islandbridge and Kilmainham which is deemed the largest burial complex of its type in western Europe and with many of the burials been of individuals from noble birth and from outside Ireland, as discussed here and here. 79.155.41.48 (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viking Burial Site
Talk:Liffey Railway Bridge

message: Why on earth is the Liffey (Rail) Bridge in a combined article title with the Phoenix Park Tunnel, a rather different thing, in an article which really is only about the bridge?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.223.210.218 (talk) 09:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a "double title". The bit in the brackets is a disambiguation qualifier which clarifies the particular bridge that is under discussion. To distinguish it from, say, the Ha'penny Bridge (the official title of which is also "the Liffey Bridge"). This is standard Wikipedia convention. See WP:NCDAB. (And compare to London Bridge (Lake Havasu City), London Bridge (TV show), etc) Guliolopez (talk) 09:45, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double title
Talk:Constitution of Delaware

message: The article on Martin W. Bates says he was a member of the Delaware Constitutional Convention of 1852.  This article and prior Delaware Constitution articles do not mention such a constitution. Is the Bates article incorrect, or was the Convention of 1852 unable to have its work adopted? --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delaware Constitutional Convention of 1852
Talk:Lucan Bridge

message: Monument to George Knowles (c1776-1856), Architect and Civil Engineer, and his wife Ann (Wormald), At St John's Church, Sharow, Ripon, North Yorkshire 
A successful engineer, contractor and architect, responsible for projects in England and Ireland. George Knowles was working in Ireland during the first and second decades of the nineteenth century and was connected both as a designer and contractor with the building of the Royal Canal. Designs by him for Mullingar Harbour and for the Sheriff Street bridge over the Canal (1808) are in the Pakenham collection. Knowles designed and built Lucan Bridge (1814) and was the contractor for Richmond Bridge (1812-16) and Whitworth Bridge (1816-17). By about 1821 Knowles was living at at Lucan House, Sharow, near Ripon where he designed St John's Church.
 
In about 1836 he moved to Wood End, The Crescent, Scarborough, a new house which he may have built himself. During his years in Scarborough he was involved in the management and development of the spa and made plans for the Spa Gardensb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.125.96 (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info for article on George Knowles (architect)
Talk:United States District Court for the District of Delaware

message: Given the acknowledged importance of the bankruptcy and other subsidiary courts for the District of Delaware, if they are not their own page should the current judges for those courts not be listed here as well? Sorry if this isn't the correct way to go about this. 128.4.157.152 (talk) 01:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy Court
Talk:Tehranpars

message: Should the Persian text be bolded? I don't do it myself because the text directionality is confusing me worse than a paradox. Plinth molecular gathered 23:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 question 

message: Tehranpars has four main squares called 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th falakeh and three metro stations named Shahid Bagheri, Tehran Pars and Farhang Sara.
Farhang Sara is the eastern end-station of Tehran Metro network.
Tehranpars was built according to a project in the Pahlavi era in order to keep pace with Tehran's rapid growth. It is surrounded by planted forests of Sorkhe-hesar and Lavizan. The name Tehran Pars literally means "Tehran's Persia".
Some of the Zoroastrian centers of Tehran such as Rostam-bagh and Markar Complex are situated in Tehranpars.
The adjacent neighbourhoods to Tehranpars are Narmak, Qanat Kowsar, Lavizan, Hakimiyeh, Khak-sefid, Majidiyeh, Shahrak-e Omid.
- moved by Mujinga (talk) 12:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving uncited text to talk
Talk:O'Connell Bridge

message: Not the only bridge wider than it is long. The Torensluis in Amsterdam is also wider than it is long (42m wide, 30m long). --Per1892 (talk) 16:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also always found that a somewhat suspect claim. The Torensluis is definitely wider than long, but there is a weird little qualifier in the assertion here that O'Connell bridge is the "only traffic bridge" wider than it is long. And the Torensluis isn't a road/traffic bridge. Being more a stationary barge at this stage with Cafés/etc. I still think the claim needs tempering though. Given that it's still uncited. I'll review and see if there is a better or clearer wording. Guliolopez (talk) 17:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pui Ching Middle School (Macau)

message: The names of the businessmen who helped to purchase the school's site in Lou's Garden are given as either  Mr. Ho Yin (Chinese: 何賢) and Mr. Chong Chi Kwong, or Mr. Brian Ho and Mr. Ziguang Zhong (钟子光). I do not know which is correct, or whether these are different transcriptions of the same names, so I have left them as is.  Also, I wonder if Ice Fishing Fu is the correct transcription of the name of the school president who served from 1953 to 1962. 
Logophile59 (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in names
Talk:Concordia International School Shanghai

message: Avoid from stating opinions as facts. While not significant, there are multiple questionable sections.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.140.10.26 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute Uniform 

message: Hello. I would like to get the bare basics up to this school's page. Can you tell me if using these five sources will be enough as a foundation?
: https://www.perkinseastman.com/projects/concordia-international-school-shanghai/
: https://theexcelligent.com/Concordia-International-School-of-Shanghai.html
: https://www.relocatemagazine.com/dir-c-concordia-international-school-shanghai
: https://www.newsweek.com/insights/leading-international-schools-2021/concordia-international-school-shanghai
: https://www.relocatemagazine.com/dirc-8099
Any advice is appreciated.  LifeIsNow001 (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loading up the basics
Talk:Delaware River and Bay Authority

message: The new Delaware River and Bay Authority Police Department is a decent article, but most of its content is really about the DRBA, not the DRBA PD. Combining the two articles would add greater context to this one without losing a topic that requires a standalone article at this point. Alansohn (talk) 13:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge from Delaware River and Bay Authority Police Department

message: The way the article is currently structured, a casual reader could be led to think that the police department is by far the most important operation of this agency.  121a0012 (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance?
Talk:Dulwich College Shanghai

message: This entry is clearly the work of the marketing department, it is pure POV and has no place in a encyclopedia. I would offer to revise, but inevitably it will be changed back to the present version pronto and I don't have the time to compete with full time staff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.157.234 (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pure POV throughout, reads like an ad

message: Seems like it was written entirely by people affiliated with school... Reads like a brochure. Needs serious work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andkore (talk • contribs) 07:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge POV issues 
Talk:High School Affiliated to Fudan University

message: Article needs wikification and should be also written from a neutral point of view. Dahliarose 23:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I have removed the copy edit tag from the article. It is not worth copy editing the present version, which needs to be completely rewritten to be encyclopedic rather than an advert, and to be based on proper secondary sources. --Stfg (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: GOCEreviewed

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Stations (poetry collection)

message: The accuracy of this article is questionable, to say the least. I find it virtually inconceivable that Seamus Heaney would ever have believed himself to be the inventor of the verse paragraph or prose poem. Heaney was acquainted with French late 19th-century poetry to the point of including his own version of a Baudelaire poem in North. He would most certainly have read the prose poems of Rimbaud and Baudelaire. Tomasboij 23:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:High School Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

message: More content is required. A few references might help. If you can't establish notability the article is likely to be deleted. Dahliarose 23:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just made a request at the China project for some translation help. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Luyten's Star

message: I'm really surprised that a star named "Luyten's Star" doesn't have a Luyten catalog designation, like Luyten 726-8 does.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogermw (talk • contribs) 20:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Those designations are now obsolete and replaced by LHS, LFT and LTT. --Yigor (talk) 00:42, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyuten catalog designation? 

message: By my arithmetic Procyon's apparent magnitude as seen from Luyten's star would be about -4.5.  
If the difference in magnitudes from the absolute magnitude is n, then for a position 1.2 light years away,
n*log(100^0.2)=log((1.2/32)^2) which gives n as -7.12 magnitudes from the absolute magnitude (at 10 parsecs, about 32 light years distant).  Wikipedia gives Procyon's absolute magnitude as 2.65, so the apparent magnitude of Procyon from Luyten's star would be 2.65+(-7.12) = -4.47.  Still impressively bright.
I suspect the author forgot to take Procyon's absolute magnitude into account.
132.3.33.68 (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent magnitude of Procyon from Luyten's Star. 
Talk:Sandra Gregory

message: OK how do I go about getting the title of the page changed from "Sandra gregory" to Sandra Gregory"?  Alcapone69 23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was her Oxford graduation but it was fine to move this unsourced stuff. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Sandra was not at Oxford University when she was caught in Thailand. She was not expelled from any university, where did that idea come from? Alcapone69 15:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments

message: Why is this woman described as an author when her only notability is as a convicted criminal? Ian Brady wrote a book about his crimes.  Does that make his primary description as author? (Goldmanuk (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the notability comes not from her crime or her prison term but from the fact she's written a bestselling book about it. You won't find articles about all the other British prisoners in Thailand for this very reason. Bienfuxia (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability means notability for inclusion in Wikipedia, which she has as an author. Whether she deserved coverage in the media is utterly irrelevant. She meets the criteria, therefore she's here. Bienfuxia (talk) 13:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. She *did* receive a lot of converage and was the main subject of at least one TV program Banged Up Abroad. Whether we like it or not, or whether that coverage was fair or justified, that coverage contributed to her notability. That coverage contriobuted to her book being successful, and that success contributed to her notability. So she does have the notability, so she is justifiably in wikipedia. Format (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: Wikipedia says over two years. But in a statement to the House of Commons in 2000, Malcolm Bruce MP said it was "over 18 months" - see here. Not a particularly important matter, but someone might want to look into it. –Tom Morris (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long was she in Thailand for before arrest? 

message: Maybe a couple of lines on his later history. 86.145.69.220 (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update on Robert Lock? 

message: I think a pic would be appropriate. 
And I thought a Contents-list was automatic, even if there are only two sections. 86.144.64.85 (talk) 11:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic & 'Contents'
Talk:Spanker (sail)

message: Our definition starts by saying "A spanker is one of two kinds of sail", but then it lists only one. Do we have any idea of what the second kind is supposed to be? DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two kinds? 

message: This article is a prime example of what a Wikipedia article should NOT be. It's only useful if you already know what the article is about. Instead of giving a clear explanation to someone who is NOT a nautical expert, it goes in circles using terms, that need definition of their own, to define other terms. The picture provided in the article, together with its caption, is almost comical. The  Spanker sails could have simply been marked red (or another color) and all other sails blue. Instead, ALL sails are blue (useless) and the caption is running in circles the same way the text of the article does. This article is a piece of non-information. It's only use case is that of a bad example. Whoever took part in writing this article: This article is bad and you should feel bad. MiBerG (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not helpful
Talk:Shanghai Minhang High School

message: More content is needed to avoid deletion. Dahliarose 23:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess