lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Libertarianism/Archive 1

message: These sentences need to be fixed or removed, as they are personal opinions under the guise of NPOV:
:Critics of this trend point out that libertarians see the market as a universal medium for regulating social interactions and advocate for the severe restriction of state function almost to the point of its elimination while classical liberals did not have this view of the state many of them advocating the expansion of the state into the role of educating children and even providing relief for the poor. Even Adam Smith believed that the utility of the market as a social mechanism was limited. These critics argue that a more accurate term to describe libertarianism would be neo-classical liberalism.
Anthony DiPierro 15:29, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: No original research

message: Still can't figure out why we have separate pages for libertarian and libertarianism.  Should we merge them?  Make one or both disambiguation pages? - Nat Krause 15:17, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The libertarianism page should stay.  I really wouldn't know what to do with the libertarian page (as it currently seems to be a disambig).  BTW am I the only one who doesn't like the "libertarianism" box which has taken the place of the disambig header (which had much more information)? millerc 18:03, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The current libertarian page is sort of a disambig.  It has a lot of material for a disambig page, much of which is redundant with other pages.  Since recent changes, it now also gives something of an unambiguous definition at the beginning.  I'm thinking it should just redirect to libertarianism, so I will work on a merge after I have regular internet access again. - Nat Krause 09:39, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Libertarian]]

message: I think it is appropriate to put Ayn Rand on the list of "Notable Theorists and Authors." Although Rand herself claimed to despise libertarianism, she seemed to be referring to the leftist-leaning Murray Rothbard.  And besides, quite a few libertarians note Atlas Shrugged as a major influence on them.  --- But having said that, I welcome comments.
::I agree.  As I understand it, her objection (and that of her 'successors') to the libertarian label springs from the fact that it does not per se denote a component of a complete and integrated philosophy such as Objectivism.  Because libertarians are philosophically diverse, she did not want her particular system of thought to be associated with that ideology.  Nevertheless, she can be said to have been in the narrow political sense a libertarian and she's had a major impact on the movement.  I think it makes sense to list her. Ubernetizen 01:16, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Ayn Rand on list?
Talk:Creatine

message: — Assignment last updated by Prad8960 (talk) 02:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Science Communication

message: Is creatine as same as steroids? 60.243.208.198 (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, creatine is not a steroid. 109.48.2.151 (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is creatine as same as steroids? 

message: I can't find any article online that specify the proportion between the 3 amino acids. If methionine is "an additional requirement", it implies that its proportion in the creatine is low. If someone can find something, put a link on this paragraph in the article.
"Creatine is not an essential nutrient. It is an amino acid derivative, naturally produced in the human body from the amino acids glycine and arginine, with an additional requirement for S-Adenosyl methionine (a derivative of methionine) to catalyze the transformation of guanidinoacetate to creatine." 37.181.51.115 (talk) 21:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It takes one of each of them. The portions that come from glycine and arginine are color-coded in the image just below the paragraph you were reading. And SAM is just a carrier of the methyl group (see the "SAM cycle" section of the article for that amino acid for more information). DMacks (talk) 22:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proportion of the 3 aminoacids? 

message: The first sentence under the Renal Function section says "Long-term creatine supplementation has not been proven safe for kidney patients."  The provided reference for this paraphrased comment is an article from Current Sports Medicine Reports written in 2002. 
Subsequently, we've had decades of research.  For example, the next paragraph which discusses a systematic review and meta-analysis in 2019 published by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc., which found that "creatine supplementation does not induce renal damage in the studied amounts and durations".
Relative to this and an abundance of more recent articles & research, the 2002 reference is very dated, a relatively weak reference to begin with (not a scientific study; not a direct quote), and consequently seems undue as the first sentence in the section.
Can we let the latest research speak for itself, or perhaps find a much more recent, highly credible/reliable source and provide a more direct quotation on the topic of safety for people with preexisting kidney problems? -- Kalem014 (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kidney Function/Safety
Talk:Landguard Fort

message: A drawing:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11244842645/
©Geni (talk) 20:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The fort in 1626

message: In the History section, after the phrase “However the main uses …”, there are some items beginning with two dashes.
Were these supposed to be regular list items, do you think? Wprlh (talk) 20:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd-looking markup in the History section?
Talk:A Day in the Life

message: I believe the line "I'd love to turn you on" is first sung after the third verse not the second, so in the section entitled "Musical Structure and Development/Basic Track" I would propose changing the first line of the 2nd paragraph to "As a link between the end of the third verse...".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewbigs (talk • contribs) 15:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd or 3rd verse?

message: Check it out... Atlantic article by Nicholas Dawidoff from May 2017. Reprinted by getpocket.com with permission. Binksternet (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlantic magazine source 

message: Piano Chord at the end of the song is inspiring Macintosh startup chime (confirmed by Apple's former sounds designer, Jim Reekes) and PlayStation 2 boot chime (unconfirmed, but pure coincidence) Beezanteeum (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Only THX Deep Note 

message: It's even in Day Trippin magazine. Speakfor23 (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Day Trippin' is a blog hosted on WordPress.com, not a reliable source (WP:PRS). Tkbrett (✉) 19:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: McCartney has in recent time noted Elvis Presley's influence on the song
Talk:List of fictional political parties

message: The Gay Republican Party was the only fictional political party I could think of.- B-101 16:49, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Assuming this page should continue to exist, is it more logical to order by county/state/etc. or by where the fictional party exists? I'd favour the latter based on the current layout, and on the ground that often a fictional party may only exist in a fictional nation.
Also, I thought that the 'Gay Republicans' in the Simpsons were a group within the party, or a pressure group... but its been a long time since I saw that episode. --Neo 20:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout of the List

message: Isn't it the "Keep Royalty White, Rat Catching and Safe Sewage Residents Party?" Cprhodesact
:That would make more sense, yes. It's also what it says in the Whole Damn Dynasty script book. I'll change it. Daibhid C 16:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackadder
Talk:Democratic Socialists of America

message: Change section on steering committee that states "The NPC elects a leadership committee of six, the Steering Committee, including seven of its own members, two of whom are the representatives of the youth section. At least two of these are constitutionally required to be women and at least one a person of color, with the National Director and the Youth Section Organizer also participating as ex officio non-voting members. The Steering Committee meets bimonthly, either in person or by conference call"
to 
"The NPC elects seven of its own members to a leadership committee, the Steering Committee, two of whom must be the representatives of the youth section. At least two of these are constitutionally required to be women and at least one a person of color. The National Director and the Youth Section Organizer also participating as ex officio non-voting members. 
The Steering Committee meets bimonthly, either in person or by conference call
"
The wordage of "They elect six including sevem from themselves" is written in a slightly confusing way. I feel that changing the wording to explicitly state it's a seven person committee and stating 5 are elected is much clearer. DirectorDirectorDirector (talk) 07:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: with a slight grammatical change. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 19:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2023 

message: Requesting to add under State and local elections
In the 2023 off-year elections, DSA endorsed or affiliated candidates retained the majority of the local seats initially won during the 2019 municipal elections. Indianapolis chapter-endorsed candidate Jesse Brown won the Democratic primary for district 13 against the incumbent vice president of the Indianapolis City-County Council. In the 2023 Chicago aldermanic elections, the Chicago City Council Democratic Socialist Caucus gained a seat with the election of Angela Clay for ward 46. Aurin Chowdhury, endorsed by the Twin Cities DSA and the Minneapolis  was elected in the 2023 Minneapolis elections for ward 12. In Denver, DSA endorsed candidate Sarah Parady won a tight race for the city's at-large seat, while Candi CdeBaca lost her re-election for district 9.  Hoosier24 (talk) 06:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2024
Talk:Women's studies

message: Women's Studies programs are well established in Canada but Canada is not mentioned in the section about the Americas. I'd add information if I was more familiar with the subject, but as I'm not more familiar with it I can't. I came here explicitly for information about women's studies in Canada. Thanks to anyone who can help. John FitzGerald (talk) John FitzGerald (talk) 19:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some information from the Canadian Encyclopedia, and put Canada second in the article because it seemed to be chronologically second.John FitzGerald (talk) 23:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada
Talk:1816 United States presidential election

message: Is there a reason that the number of votes fell from ~278,00 in 1812 to ~112,00 in 1816? I would have expected the popular vote to increase, according to the census the population of the United States grew by 33% between 1810 and 1820. yorkshiresky (talk) 19:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fall in numner of votes

message: I find it quite bizarre that Wikipedia has actually claimed popular vote figures in presidential elections from before 1824, likely fudged from another website. I have deleted dubious popular vote references from the 1820 and 1816 elections, but I feel stupid when it comes to editing tables, so I might have messed some things up by accident. A lesson in table editing, or a cleanup from another Wikipedian for elections before 1824, or a request for comment would be very helpful. Classicalfan626 (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable popular vote figures from before 1824 are not available 

message: Might be worth mentioning that this was the first presidential election in which Ohio voted.SecretName101 (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ohio 

message: It should be pointed out (1) very few countries had reliable popular votes at this time, particularly not on a national level, yet Wikipedia gives totals for the election this year in France, which derives from equally inadequate sources; (2) the US elections of 1820 have better sourcing than almost any election in this period, coming from actual returns, (3) translations of the returns in question come to us from e.g. Dubin, U.S Presidential Elections 1788-1860, a book in my possession for about $20, and other books which any Wikipedian could buy if they chose.
The point is the USA had the vastest democracy at this point in history, so it is illogical that actual tallies of votes should be suppressed on Wikipedia for this era. Marplesmustgo (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues re the popular vote at this election
Talk:Iannic-ann-ôd

message: I removed a large portion of this article. This included two stories, which are possible copyright violation, and do not belong in Wikipedia anyway, and also a quote from a book , with no mention of permission. Darksun 17:55, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Which Celtic language is Iannic-ann-ôd from?  FWIW, the stories that used to be here mention Quimper and Brest, which would put them in Brittany rather than the British Isles.  Smerdis of Tlön 18:37, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is this from?
Talk:The Doctor (Doctor Who)

message: Given that Brian (Rory's father) appeared a few times during the series, would it be reasonable to add him as The Doctor's grandfather-in-law, given he is Rory's father?  Pokelego999 (talk) 22:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He apears in more episodes than Adam but Adam is listed as a companion so yeah I think he should apear. OLI 14:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

text: To be honest, grandfather-in-law isn't a common metric even with real people unless you're compiling a family tree, and with this character there's too much OR involved (not to mention being too in-universe) with such a thing. DonQuixote (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Brian be added as a relative of The Doctor? 

message: If Tenth/Fourteenth Doctor (David Tennant) is still able to re-generate and he manages to do so what happens to the List of Doctors order as there is no guarantee that he will eventually become Gatwa as there could be Unknown Doctors between the two versions of The Doctor. 
Also, should Tennant's 14th Doctor regenerate, it's also possible he could gain an unfamiliar face or revert to another previous one. Even though the bi-regeneration in The Giggle gave us Fifteenth Doctor (Ncuti Gatwa) and Fourteenth Doctor (David Tennant) at the same time it is still possible the 15th could have been pulled in from somewhere in the future. We don't know if both Doctors can re-generate yet or just Gatwa. - 2A02:C7C:53C1:E00:90CB:DA01:E677:CD31 (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's entirely too much speculation at play here. If/when such things transpire, then the article can reflect that. Until then, there's nothing reasonable to revise in the article. Beyond that, this discussion page shouldn't be a forum for what-if scenarios. —Shada Ng (talk | contribs) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bi-regeneration and the possible regeneration of 2 Doctors and List of Doctors Order 

message: Since the timeless children, there is some debate among fans as to whether the Doctor is fully Gailfreyan. Hence some users have edited "Unknown, Gallifrey (adopted)" Has there been confirmation or not from the writers? ~~ 92.17.199.182 (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: a voice changer of a dalek 111.220.173.112 (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice changer dalek
Talk:Mime (disambiguation)

message: I propose that this be a redirect to MIME and a dictionary definition link be put at the top of that page, as that is why most of the links to this page are trying to do.  --Spook (my talk | my contribs) 08:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually no, most of the links are about the theatre mime. We do need an article about the Greek play definition of mime, though... Bookgrrl 02:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Revised to be in line with the MoS guidelines for dab pages.  Also removed gratuitous religious comment from the discussion page. --Bookgrrl 01:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style change

message: Mime redirects to the email encoding and not the performance art? I propose Mime be redirected to the disambiguation page, if not redirected to the performance art article outright. Cheers, Lankybugger 23:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved since. --Wisdood (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously?
Talk:Wikipedia/Archive 2

message: : Wikipedia is supported by free software exponent Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation
Do we have a reference for this?
::I've heard Stallman mentioned Wikipedia in some public occasion and gave some positive comments. Perhaps that's what "support" means. Though I don't have a reference in English. I am not sure about FSF's support. Tomos 00:10, 2 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stallman
Talk:John Davis

message: Can someone format 
? Thanks. Neutrality (talk) 18:38, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: JOHN DAVIS,THE GOVENOR OF LOISIANA.AND ALSO SUPPORTED SEGREGATION.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.5.149.122 (talk) 12:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  K 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/John Davis was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Is anything known about the John Davis who is host and executive producer of MotorWeek?  66.92.79.129 (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MotorWeek 

message: John Davis (Force 136) lacks an article (not even linked) - this external link should provide a start:
:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1534356/John-Davis.html 86.176.208.143 (talk) 21:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military
Talk:Jill Farren Phelps

message: There really does need to have some semblance of a balance in this article. I know I wrote most of the "accusations", but this has now become the entire article, and I think it would only be fair to her to mention the good things she has done, most notably being at the helm for Emmy wins at Santa Barbara. Mike H 21:43, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
I added some strengths. What do you think? --JamesB3 03:02, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good. I think it adequately addresses the balance issue. Thanks! :-) Mike H 18:13, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
I was curious regarding the statemenet at the end,"glory days from AW." Do you consider her time at AW her glory days because she had complete control? I'm just curious. Many AW viewers consider Jill Farren Phelps to be a contributor to AW downfall. Some go as far as to say her tenure on AW made the show the worst it ever was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mscooter25 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 5 June 2006
Darn I see all the JFP criticism is gone now. Oh well it was always a fun read of what that witch does!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loser user (talk • contribs) 05:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I removed the second and third subsections of the 'Controversies' section as they were unsourced criticism of a living person, which violates WP:BLP. Please do not re-add this material without references to reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance

message: I was surprised there was no mention of block voting, a technique Phelps created to help her show win Emmys (by, if I remember correctly, organizing the entire ballot-receiving staff to vote together). Is it an issue of finding a source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.4.94 (talk) 20:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Block voting 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Jill Farren Phelps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://generalhospital.about.com/cs/aboutighi/a/ghproducer.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 — TAnthonyTalk 18:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Very surprised that wasn’t mentioned because that’s what everyone in the soap world calls her. Pookerella (talk) 04:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you know we rely on reliable sources and not forum posts. If "everyone" calls her that then you should have no trouble finding a reliable source saying as much.— TAnthonyTalk 16:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Soap Killer
Talk:De Havilland Mosquito

message: On the de Havilland Mosquito page it is claimed that: " Wing Commander John Cunningham claimed 19 of his 20 victories at night on Mosquitoes."
This is certainly not so - the bulk of his victories were on Beaufighters. FlyingOko (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the claim as incorrect and added a citation needed tag for the remaining claim. From Bowman's The men who flew the Mosquito p. 121. it states that Cunningham's seventeenth victory was his first with a Mosquito. Our article on Cunningham states that he was credited with twenty aircraft destroyed (and others damaged) so it appears that he could only have claimed three with a Mosquito. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 19:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Slightly wrong arithmetic. Cunningham and Rawnsley are credited with 16 kills on Beaus and four on Mosquitos. Bob Braham had one on Blenheims, 19 on Beaus and 9 on Mosquitos. Branse Burbridge had 21, all on Mosquitos.Khamba Tendal (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Cunningham and the Mosquito
Talk:Yokosuka MXY-7 Ohka

message: The "Design and Development" section tells us that "The MXY-7 Navy Suicide Attacker Ohka was a manned flying bomb that was usually carried underneath a Mitsubishi G4M2e Model 24J 'Betty' bomber to within range of its target." However, the closest variant name listed in the Mitsubishi G4M article is the "G4M2e Model 24 Tei." Which is correct? Or, if synomymous, should we use consistent nomenclature in both articles? 24J or 24 Tei?
Jdickinson (talk) 08:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I can confirm that the text in this article matches the cited source, the designation is also repeated in the source's pages on the G4M. The variants section in the G4M article has no citations at all. Most likely a difference in the multiple Japanese designation/naming systems in use at the time. Francillon notes that the 'E' versions were modified and re-designated 'B' and 'C' versions. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 11:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Mitsubishi G4M?
Talk:Delena cancerides

message: Spielberg?  Not accornding to Arachnophobia (film).
*fixed  –Matt 08:15, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone added taxonomy information into the text body (which I deleted, because the taxonomy table is there already) and Walckenaer was the last word. I don't know though, which new information that might give... -Mardus 17:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 