lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Jacob Niles

message: The article says that the Martin Scorcese film "No Direction Home" features one song by John Jacob Niles. I think the name of the song should be listed. I don't know what it is yet but I'm revisiting the film soon to find out. Lots of people have been asking me and I think it would be useful to have it listed. Bmaestas (talk) 01:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song featured in "No Direction Home" 

message: Why is this article included in the list of musical hoaxes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.144.133 (talk) 01:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, now it seems we have no mention whatsoever of the blurriness of the line between what he uncovered and what he composed. I don't know enough on the subject to dig up material to use, but I know enough to know the article should address that topic. Lawikitejana (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Hoaxes?
Talk:California Department of Conservation

message: I wouldn't say the article is too terribly biased, but it is largely copied and pasted from http://www.conservation.ca.gov/index/AboutUs/Pages/aboutUs.aspx. It seems like it could use some significant revision to make the POV more neutral, and to sound more encyclopedic in general. I checked the copyright information, and fortunately the text of the website is in the public domain, so there is no issue there.
Zahnrad (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Tone 

message: If you go to their actual website, they have a different logo. Please update! --77.23.54.32 (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated logo
Talk:California Department of Education

message: It doesn't seem worthwhile to have both California Department of Education and California Superintendent of Public Instruction. Perhaps the latter could be a subsection of the former? — Chris53516 (Talk) 14:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: In the graph, it says during a period, there was vacancy (nobody). It should be said who or
what was the big boss during this time.--Archeopteryx (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vacancy? 

message: * Aside from the obvious Spanish name (misspelled here, but we know what the document creator meant to say), we have:
* Chinese: 加利福尼亞州教育局
* Hmong: California Lub Rooj Tsav Xwm Saib Xyuas Tej Kev Kawm Ntawv (there is no Hmong Wikipedia, but the description can go in the Commons)
* Vietnamese: Sở Giáo Dục California
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other language names
Talk:California State Parks

message: This section is in some serious need of an update. It's my understanding, based on some research I did while updating China Camp State Park, that, partly due to the outcry when the "hidden funds" 54 million dollars laying around was discovered, a bunch of the parks did not in fact close but were taken over in whole or in part by local government or private operators (public-private partnerships) and that some of them have even now been returned to the control of the state. For example, of the three in Marin County that were going to close (China Camp, Olompali State Historic Park, and Tomales Bay State Park), all three were operated for a while by Marin State Parks Association and then the last two were handed back over to state control in 2013.  China Camp is still being operated by a nonprofit (Friends of China Camp) but they were hoping to hand that one back too. 
Not being a resident of California or an expert on what's happening in every county in the state with its parks, I don't feel like I can update this topic for the whole state, but right now the article is leaving the inaccurate impression that all the 70 parks on the list were closed.  In addition, while the "hidden funds" controversy is mentioned, it's not integrated with the topic of the park closures. TheBlinkster (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed closures section  
Talk:Marine, &c., Broadcasting (Offences) Act 1967

message: How was this act enforced?  The UK would only have jurisdiction in its own territorial waters, so I don't see how it could have made a difference.  --Xyzzyva 18:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is in need of drastic cleanup, it is actually about Marine Broadcasting, and not about the act itself! It was also highly informal. I have made some emergency fixes but more must be done Johnzw 01:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yipes! 

message: I have undertaken a major rewrite of the text and removed the original below this note. Most of the original strays of course or was just plain incorrect in its basic text. This is an article about law and I have tried to stick to the topic. It now needs expanding by linking other laws that I have referenced within the text. Fragilethreads 17:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yipes! You are right!

message: Shouldn't this article contain references to the other various updates of the act, ending with the 1991 200 mile limit?  Also, while I'm here, would it be possible to post a map of the 200 mile broadcasting limit?  Incredibly, I've searched the 'net and can't find one anywhere.  Maybe I'm using the wrong search terms, there must be one somewhere. Deke42 (talk) 21:52, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs updating
Talk:California Digital Library

message: Craig: I'm going to focus on the tools and ways that the CaDL differentiates itself in information retrieval. I will focus specifically on the information in the "Discovery and Delivery" section of the CaDL website.
Alex: I plan to focus on access and publishing in regard to the CaDL. This will encompass the eScholarship, eScholarship PLUS, Online Archive of California, Calisphere, and UC Libraries Digital Collection sections of the CaDL website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astubbs12 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Digital Library page 

message: Hi guys!
To start off, your article is nicely parsed out with useful subheadings, especially because as a Digital Library not many people would be familiar with the services provided. There is a nice weight to each section that gives the overall entry a comfortable sense of being adequately fleshed out, but there are a few touch-ups that could polish it. Perhaps a picture or logo would help with the visual aspect, and if a term has its own Wiki page it wouldn’t hurt to include a link to it (for example, Melvyl). In addition, there were only one or two minor grammatical errors. Overall, I liked that the segments followed a logical progression in regards to what is done with the information. Juxtapositionn (talk) 05:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of California Digital Library 

message: To begin, I felt that this article was nicely organized and easily navigated thanks to the useful subtitles and headings that you added.  Within each major section, you were able to add more detail on each topic by creating subheadings and expanding on them in detail throughout the article.  Each of your sections were developed and had enough information to be considered important to add onto the article and I felt like you were able to find applicable information for each section.  I do feel as if you could have maybe gotten a wider array of sources along the lines of other systems that are similar or something like that.  Also, even though your headings and the dissection of the sections were asthetically pleasing, a picture could have made it even better and more pleasing to the eye.  Overall, good job! Adelemg (talk) 20:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of California Digital Media Library 

message: Where does CaDL come from?  It is just "CDL". 50.0.83.84 (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  CaDL vs CDL
Talk:California Eagle

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:California Environmental Quality Act

message: I'm bad at citation editing in Wikipedia (side effect of having graduated college PRE INTERNET!!!) but, the cites to the CEQA law and CEQA Guidelines cover a lot of the content, including all my recent (minor-ish) edits (I hope). At any rate, wanted to suggest a new section be added to discuss the 2015 expansion of Tribal consultation requirements under CEQA per AB 52 (see, e.g., https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_AB_52_Presentation_Discussion_Draft.pdf) I'll do it if I get time. But I mostly edit from my iPad & it is NOT FUN to use for any major editing work. I'll propose the additions here once I do get around to it. Thanks!!!  Cynthisa (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback

message: Would anyone have any objections to clarifying the Environmental Impact Analysis section of the article? The first statement "The lead agency must analyze project impacts to 18 different environmental resource factors detailed in Appendix G during their CEQA review." is misleading.
Not only has Appendix G been updated (I believe there are 20 sections now), but CEQA is unique in that it characterizes the environment and environmental impacts quite broadly. Agencies aren't required to use Appendix G, and environmental issues that aren't listed in the checklist may still come up in the process. Philipmichaelangelo (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: One problem this article has is that much of that information is not sourced.  It would be helpful if you clarified that as you suggest, as long as you include the sources that someone can use to verify that those added/updated tatements are true. ---Avatar317(talk) 20:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Characterization of Environmental Impact Analysis
Talk:California executive branch

message: , thanks for working on an update! Could you please break it down into smaller edits? Some of the stuff removed I added, and I have an interest in seeing it stick around. But I don't want you to be discouraged from updating the article if you feel that it needs it. Also appreciate 's help. II | (t - c) 12:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial update
Talk:Fremontodendron californicum

message: importance lies in the fact that a subspecies is endangerd. Anlace 21:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Your link to "Tilden Botanical Garden" Photos has been hijacked to Bitcoin investment stuff.
Signed 20:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article history shows that that link always went to bitcoin for some reason, so maybe the editor made an error, or maybe it was hidden spam; either way, external links aren't for personal photo pages anyway, so I've removed it. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Link

message: — Assignment last updated by Purplecal225 (talk) 06:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Talk:SBOA School & Junior College

message: This article seems to be like a newspaper/personal opinion of the SBOA schools, which does not contain much info reg the schools or the association themselves. It seems to simply be a list of what the Chennai edition of the school has. Please consider including more info, citing proper references and if possible, lengthening the article and removing unnecessary items from the article. For example, do we really need the blog of an old student of the school within the encyclopedia article for the School? Also, if the infrastructure of the school is really "the best", we need some scale of comparison by which we can definitely say that it is the best. I've placed the appropriate (what I felt were appropriate) templates for the style of writing and the lack of references. Please reply if any of you feel that the templates are unnecessary. Thanks! aJCfreak yAkBaK 10:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Ajcfreak. Besides the names of ALL the academic supervisors have not been mentioned. The English department has three A.S.'s and the math dept 2. Though i don't remember their names, i feel they ought to be put up there, and i would appreciate it if anybody who do know the names can put them up. Besides, the school has other departments too, like the social science department. Also, the construction of the indoor theater hall(it looks more like a mini basketball stadium) has been completed.
Smokey360 12:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. So where could we find verifiable, reliable sources for references? Any ideas?! :) aJCfreak yAk 17:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/References 

message: Really... Wikipedia's not the place to publish the names of the students who've led the school every year. Now, if any of the school leaders did something extraordinary in their style of leadership, which is worthy to be included in an encyclopedia, then we could include that info, I guess. But simply naming the school leaders.... :) aJCfreak yAk 00:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Pupil leaders 

message: "Fcuk and get Fcuked" or "Fuck and get Fucked" is not the motto of this school. The edit has been removed. Such instances of vandalism will not be tolerated Binarymoron (talk) 07:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Lake Grove, Oregon

message: I grew up in Lake Grove and relocated away from there in 1960. I know there was regular bus service in the 1950s to Portland because my father often took the bus to his job at the Oregon Journal newspaper downtown (since defunct). But I don't know who ran the busses.
BTW on summer days I often swam at the Lake Grove Swim Park pictured in the story, on Lakeview Boulevard. Local residents had "easement rights" and others were supposedly barred, though I never saw anybody checking. Lake Grove elementary teachers Mr. Potts and Mr. Giffen could often be seen there playing ping pong very impressively! Alas, who remembers them today? Lost even to Wiki.
:The Oregonian publishing company had a big boxy building on the waterfront between the Willamette and Harbor Drive.  There was Blue Bus lines (Oregon) which ran buses between many of the suburbs and Portland as well as Rose City Transit which ran lines within Portland.  TriMet displaced (or absorbed?) all the bus companies.
:Access to L.G. swim park was based on whether one lived in the Lake Grove water district which was verified with the address on some I.D.  Questionable addresses were looked up on a big map on the back wall of the entrance booth.  As kids, we'd just run around the back of it and no one cared; at least part of that probably was the large number of people entering at the same time:  adults were closely checked, but kids were assumed to be with the adults (which few were).  By the time I was in college, they did care and it was hard to get past them once I officially changed my address from my mom's.
:Giffen doesn't ring a bell, but Potts does.  Mrs. Anderson was a popular second grade teacher who was near retirement in 1966 and had taught for decades—since before the new building was built (after a big fire) around 1957.  Reliable sources for this information could probably be found in old newspapers, but it is quite doubtful there will be archived copies online for the Lake Oswego Review or its predecessor the Oswego Review.  I haven't found any so far.  —EncMstr (talk) 06:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus service in Lake Grove 
Talk:California Graduate Institute

message: This reads like a brochure from the institute in question.129.67.109.195 (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow wikipeidans, I just deleted the external link as it appeared to link to a scam site. I am not aware of the legitimate website this page should link too. If anyone has any additional information it would be helpful. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinopt (talk • contribs) 23:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting External Link
Talk:California High School (San Ramon, California)

message: Would it be appropriate to add information on the band and/or sports? RedSkunktalk 00:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as the info. is related to the school then yes; further, it may be appropriate to include alumni. DWP17 (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Band and Sports

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved After relisting this request there appears to consensus to not move move this article. I reviewed the comments from the participants below, and I checked sources online to confirm that any move taken would be correct. With all this taken together I am closing this request. (non-admin closure)  Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 December 2023
Talk:Smt. Sulochanadevi Singhania School

message: https://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai-news/ht-top-mumbai-schools-2019-10-best-schools-in-city-s-north/story-Sb3hn0FG1k4EsXovl04oUP.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byasa Banerjee (talk • contribs) 05:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  made edits based on link
Talk:California Institution for Women

message: If anyone is interested, I have proposed a new Wikiproject concerning prisons here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 00:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: When does prop 57 go into effect Catalinahin (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prop 57 
Talk:Muntinlupa Science High School

message: I've been watching articles about Muntinlupa for more than a year now. Please put citation and sources and please do not use weasel words.
Lahat po tayo, Taga-Muntinlupa. Tulungan po nating dagdagan ang kaalaman tungkol sa ating Lungsod sa Internet.
Lakas, Talino't Buhay! Hhh210 (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Watch
Talk:Marah fabacea

message: the claim that the plant's leaves can be used as vegetables despite it tasting unfavorable has been unsupported by citation since the article was created, and seems to even be copied to the article Marah fabacea in 2006. This claim is at least present in the articles on Marah macrocarpa, Marah fabacea, and Marah watsonii
The user that created this page (see this version and this version) notes the edit to be "basic facts from Jepson Manual and personal observation", but i couldn't manage to find anything about edibility on the Jepson Manual.
This was then copied word for word onto the macrocarpa article here and the watsonii article here two years later after the fabacea article was written 
Pepper (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  potential original research regarding use and edibility
Talk:California Medical Facility

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: Wouldn't Don DeFreeze ('Field Marshall Cinque') of the SLA qualify as a notable inmate of Vacaville?  According to Brad Schreiber's 'Revolution's End,' Defreeze was sentenced to CMF on December 3, 1970 (page 41, Nook pagination). Deshy2 (talk) 03:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely. I've added him, with a reference indicating that he was at CMF, not the nearby Solano State Prison. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 18:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Inmates 

message: Why is there a See Also section if nothing is below it? Jhurley85 (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also
Talk:California Men's Colony

message: This article is written in the tone of a guidebook to visiting the prison rather than an encyclopedic article about the prison (why no mention of the Timothy Leary escape. I know, , but I don't know the subject well enough to rewrite it, unfortunately. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 12:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: I would like to send money to inmate for phone calls, how do I do this?  L. Frankini  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.125.101 (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deposit money into inmates account 
Talk:NIT Bill

message: I have tried to wikify this article. However, someone who knows should claify what the "MHRD" and the "HRD" are.
The title and contents refer to a Bill. If the Bill has passed, both should refer to an Act. If it did not pass as expected last year the article is probably about a non-notable piece of "almost-legislation". Avalon 05:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:California Midwinter International Exposition of 1894

message: Cool stuff -- can someone tell me if the band shell near there also dates from the 1894 exposition? --Estephan500 (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Hello! The 16 students enrolled in my Golden Gate Park first year seminar (at the University of San Francisco) and I are getting ready to work on this page. We hope to bring more context, add more details, and provide more references and relevant links. Silverinsf (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class editing of California Midwinter International Exposition of 1894 page 

message: Should add something to Bonet's tower about the cafe inside of it. --TheAnonymousQ (talk) 01:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions that could be made 

message: This piece claims, under The Fair's Legacy, that the De Young Museum is one of the, structures that can still be seen in the park today"."Since the current museum building was opened in 2005, it is highly unlikely that this erroneous claim should be left here. I have checked the Wikipedia entry on Time Travel to see if there is any mention of the De Young Museum being sent back and/or forth through time. Assuming we can document that the De Young has indeed been subject to a shift in the space-time continuum then this claim should stand. However, since there is substantial evidence that the current De Young Museum, though situated in the Music Concourse at Golden Gate Park, the very site of the Midwinter International Exposition of 1894, was actually built 111 years after the Expo. So, by higher reason, the current De Young Museum is, in fact, not one of the remaining structures. I agree that we should all be open to the prospect of time travel being a factor, but since the current museum looks nothing like the original building, I think we should assume that the original author who made that claim doesn't know what they are talking about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.115.32.203 (talk) 06:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Young Museum