Talk:Pet food

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Pet food which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://newsletter.sgs.com/eNewsletterPro/uploadedimages/000006/sgs-safeguards-05013-eu-update-for-maximum-level-of-melamine-in-canned-pet-food-a4-en-13.pdf
*:Triggered by \bsgs\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Pet food]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pet food. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://menufoods.com/recall/product_cat.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pet food. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://menufoods.com/recall/product_dog.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pet food. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://useu.usmission.gov/agri/petfood.html#Petfood
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://useu.usmission.gov/agri/petfood.html#Petfood
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090524005409/http://www.petfoodinstitute.org:80/petfoodhistory.htm to http://www.petfoodinstitute.org/petfoodhistory.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: With the rise of 'clean meat' pet food, perhaps we should have some discussion of the ETHICS and UTILITY of feeding animals called 'pet food' (in the markets) to animals called 'pets' (in our experience).  An entire article on 'pet feeding' might be justifiable at this time. MaynardClark (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethics and Utility 

message: Someone has helpfully listed the US regulations for pet food verbatim, but this is large and could be paraphrased.
There is also no information about regulation outside the US.
Within the article there is also some sneaky commercial-type editing that contains consumer-oriented material (sources citing consumer perception) and perhaps a lack of balance caused by the lack of scientific data on non-commercial pet food.
if anyone would like to weigh in on this I'll follow the page
--1.159.83.54 (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  American perspective