lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Home Made Kazoku

message: Awesome! HMKU for life, right? Fourange (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Description: 

message: Could somebody update the page to make it more Manual of Style: Japan-ish, it's lacking MoS:Japan fiber. Seriously a lot of the titles are like capitalized and it's wrong...
And does anyone know why they have such perfect English? They seriously sound like native English speakers... they don't speak Engrish like most other J-pop artists...Moocowsrule (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...-_-* 

message: I was going through Apple Music and checking which albums “Thank You!!” is included in and I noticed these three missing from the article if anyone wants to add any information about them: Home Made Kazoku @ The Animes, Kahou - THE BEST OF HOME MADE KAZOKU, and LAST FOREVER 16 HITS.NickWX28 (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Albums
Talk:Clontarf, Queensland

message: The article provides no explanation of the Irish roots of the suburb which is named after a seaside suburb of Dublin with the same name.  Something that may also be worth a mention is that locals of Redcliffe mis-pronounce the name of the suburb.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by IAmCylon (talk • contribs) 23:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clontarf Dublin
Talk:Richmond, Queensland

message: A television program mentioned blocks of land being offered @ $1 per block to encourage people to consider moving to, and establishing themselves as residents in Richmond.
I haven't been able to gather any information to consider this generous offer.
Can anyone assist me? Can Richmond council put something on the net to either confirm or deny this report? And if it proves to be factual, a little more meaningful information wouls prove most welcome.
Thankyou,
John (in the overcrowded south east corner)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.248.91 (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Try this link here. Note that :Jandowae, Queensland had a similar promotion some time ago. -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  land @ $1 per block
Talk:Clermont, Queensland

message: There are several of these in the article.  For example, they are provided after the address is given of every school in the town.  For what purpose?  Are the schools camouflaged?  Or otherwise just very hard to find?  I’m going to delete  them unless anyone objects.  I’m doing a lot of copy edit work on these articles (towns and localities in central Queensland) and to my mind they just clutter the articles and, to be quite frank, make them look a bit silly.  I mean, what’s more important?  Useful facts or coordinates of places which are easy to find?  Boscaswell talk 02:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the discussion at :Category:Towns in Queensland, I believe they are useful now and going forward. Kerry (talk) 08:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical coordinates
Talk:Clustal

message: I have never gotten a definitive answer on whether CLUSTAL is an acronym.  I have heard that, of course, the "W" stands for "weighted" in CLUSTALW--but what of the term itself???--Frenkmelk 04:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tad late, but hey: clustered alignment? Jack the Stripper (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym?
Talk:Sort (Unix)

message: If anyone can tell me that "How can sort a directory by the size of the files?"
Regards,
Chouhan
:A question like that, not directly related to the content of the article is better asked to your computer - if it's Unix, try "man ls". If Windows, "start --> Help and support". Or you may try the many help Usenet forums online. --Unixguy 15:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question on sorting a directory

message: I went ahead and added the requested example of sorting files by size to the article. I'd say that the format of the article isn't like other Unix commands, like file, for example. Also the content can be added to and improved upon. I'll see if I can do that later. --Unixguy 15:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sort article - format and content 

message: The $'\t' is a nicer way of specifying than embedding a tab into a shell script.
And some of the escaping methods fail, resulting in this fun message from sort:
sort: multi-character tab `\\t'
A nice article is:
http://blog.jasoncust.com/2011/12/bash-sort-what-hell-is-up-with-tabs.html
I added two citations to sources for bash and Korn Shell.
Admittedly, the escaping syntax will fail in csh and tcsh with:
csh % sort -t $'\t'
Illegal variable name.
csh % 
CSH and older shells can use code like:
$ sort -t"`/bin/echo '\t'`"
or this:
$ sort -t `awk 'BEGIN{printf("\t");}'` 
Lent (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSV (Tab Separated Values) 

message: It might be beneficial to list the different sorting algrothithms used by different implementations (for instance, BSD sort not just GNU sort...)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.2.125.52 (talk) 15:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting algorithm across Unixes 

message: The page indicates that mergesort is the implementation for this, but according to the quicksort page, it is the Unix implementation. Needs citation? --ManOminous (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict with Quicksort 

message: Could this example be wrong?
I would expect Bob to be ranked third. And I wonder about the syntactic meaning of the second "," in "-k2,2,"
--Utonsal (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  example wrong?
Wikipedia talk:WikipediaWeekly

message: I can't find episodes 107 and 108 on archive.org  
Is there anyone here who can track them down? Or anywhere else I can download audio files for my digital music player?
--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. I don't know if you are able to track how many people listen to the podcast, but you should know that there are at least a few of us. Thanks, SchreiberBike talk 21:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest episodes on archive.org? 

message: In episode 105, you mentioned a new course at a Washington college structured around student edit-a-thons. Please post a link. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it! diff. Should it be in the education program course list? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 105 - link to DC course in 2014? 

message: 109 is coming up, but I can't see the etherpad. I would like to add Wikimania to the agenda.  ϢereSpielChequers 00:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 109

message: Shall we make another episode sometime for old time's sake? -- Tawker (talk) 23:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  110 

message: : :) :D Generish (talk) 20:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates? 

message: I just recently began listening and see that it ended in 2017 with ep. #127. Why was it discontinued? Will there be any new episodes of the podcast? I really love the podcast and would love to help get it started again! Ajshul<talk> 17:20, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of the Podcast 

message: The https certificate used for the external address of the podcast is showing as invalid Back ache (talk) 13:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTTPS certificate in invalid
Talk:Amerika

message: Shouldn't Amerika, Drenthe be America, Netherlands? -- Petri Krohn 04:46, 4 October 2006 (UT)
No way, America and Amerika are two unrelated places, one in the province Drenthe the other in Dutch Limburg.ThW5 (talk) 12:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amerika, Drenthe  

message: Abbie Hoffman continually refers to "Amerika" in his book, "Steal This Book". I believe it's an incidence of Amerika used as a slur - maybe we can link to it in this way through this disambiguation page. There was also "AmeriKKKa" in the Vietnam era. 67.151.81.122 (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steal This Book
Talk:Density altitude

message: I am new to this, so excuse me if I am misunderstanding anything, but I don't understand how this formula can give the density altitude if it does not refer to the actual altitude.  Testing it, it only seems to give the correct answer at sea level.  For example:
Altitude = 6000 feet
Temperature = 25 Deg C (298.15 K)
Pressure = 1003.25 mb
Using a "rule of thumb" calculation one gets a density altitude of 8940 Feet, but the formula gives 1497 feet.
Am I doing something wrong?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:You are not doing anything wrong. However, bear in mind that the pressure in the formula is the actual air pressure at your current altitude. A pressure of 1003.25 hPa at a terrain elevation of 6000 feet would translate to a QNH of about 1225 hPa, which is inconceivably high (remember that pressure drops with around 1 hPa per 27 feet increase in altitude, in ISA conditions in the lower parts of the atmosphere). Presumably, the pressure you mention is a QNH, which would translate to an actual pressure of around 1003 - (6000 / 27) = 781 hPa at 6000 feet.
D3burt (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units, accuracy etc 

message: There exist easier rules of thumb formulae for converting from pressure altitude to density altitude which will be nearly as (in)accurate and of more pratcical use.  Looking...  Paul Beardsell 03:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An easier formula reqd 

message: "...reduction in air density reduces the wing's lift" is not lift a function of pressure not density? It would seem this is non sequitur, I suggest: "a corresponding drop in pressure caused through a reduction in air desity, reduces the lift a wing can generate at a given velocity"46.208.62.169 (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft Safety, item one 
Talk:Emerald City (play)

message: Support As the film constitutes what is essentially a major performance of the play, although it's edited and revised, the material currently on the page makes more sense in light of discussion of the play rather than duplicating it on a film page, as there is only one film version (there are two listed on IMDb, but one is the video of the scene that I directed in college, which is appaenlty retained under a grandfather clause that appears to be unwritten). --Scottandrewhutchins 04:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Emerald City (film)]]

message: *Start class - short introduction, lacks Reception heading, and needs formatting changes to conform to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Theatre/Article_Structure guidelines.
*Low importance - a single play constitutes a "highly specific area of knowledge"
--Dereksmootz (talk) 17:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Theatre Assessment
Talk:Command HQ

message: According to  and , someone bought the rights to this game around 1999 and started selling a patched PC version that "updated the colors and fixed that annoying unit production glitch." Anyone know more about this? 134.117.137.69 (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patched version 

message: I just look at the article and the review clearly state that this is a fun, easy to learn, strategic global conquest game designed by Ozark Software. Unfortunately it has one fatal flaw: its copy protection. This refers to a problem with the copy protection present in very early retail version of the game. This bug was fixed more than 23 years ago and is no longer present in the game. Actually copy protection is no longer part of the game at all (version 1.97 and above). 
I don't think that this bug should be held against an otherwise great game. I would like to recommend that we at least mention that in the article.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giavin01 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon review 
Talk:Technicolor for Industrial Films

message: It's a notable film, because back in the 40's most Ephemeral films were in Black and white. Just 5 years later many Ephemeral films were in color. This film documents the increasing use of color in Ephemeral films. Plus, it's a great film, very entertaining. Yet-another-user 04:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:George Beadle

message: Joe is cool? If no one disagree I will delete that. Seems to be vandalism.Max Mux (talk) 17:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs a section on Beadle's career at the University of Chicago. Without such a section, the article is effectively useless. ---Dagme (talk) 17:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Chicago
Talk:12323 Haeckel

message: This article was moved without discussion or notice to 12323 Hackel. I think it is unlikely there would be consensus for such a move, especially given two current move discussions for other minor bodies; I therefore moved it back. If one wishes to move this page, I ask that it be proposed here initially and a move request initiated if appropriate. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move notice
Talk:Guerrilla ontology

message: Dogma run over by karma -  News at 11.00
The zen way of explaining Guerrilla ontology Demercurio 05:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I'm the user who just deleted that long block of text; I had forgotten to sign in. It is not integrated into the article in any way and has no sources. If this is not an attributed quote, then it is far too subjective for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Ueli-PLS (talk) 02:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Randomness
Talk:Holden Commodore (VC)

message: In the Overview section of this article, I dispute the accuracy of the following text:
"..and were known as the XT5 versions, although are commonly referred to as the Blue motors."
The text is referring to the 'blue' 6-cylinder engine; however, I have ONLY ever seen Holden's engine code "XT5" applied to the performance option of the blue 5.0L V8 as fitted to the VC HDT 'Brock' Commodore (this can be confirmed on external articles such as https://www.whichcar.com.au/features/history-of-the-holden-v8-part-two-blue-black-motor-1980-to-2000) which is subsequently mentioned in this article (but does not mention this engine option). I am happy to be proven wrong, but in this case no reference is cited as the basis of this statement.
I have therefore added a 'citation needed' template to the original text amd propose if an appropriate citation is not added within an acceptable period (2 weeks?), the respective text is amended accordingly.
Blammy1 (talk) 22:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Citation needed for XT5 engine version' 

message: This car looks exactly like the Opel Commodore C with the grille of the Opel Senator A. Seems like a fairly simple rebadge job except for the engines, and the article should say so. --Cancun (talk) 12:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opel
Talk:List of Holden vehicles

message: In the timeline of Holden vehicles, there is a text note at the bottom stating "HQ–WB Statesmans not marketed under the 'Holden' brand, but rather the separate 'Statesman' brand." This is incorrect.
The Statesman was marketed as a Holden product (or more correctly as a GMH product, as General Motors-Holden was the official company name), and continued to be so until the final series in production. HQ-WB series may not have carried Holden badges, and were considered separate from the Kingswood and Commodore, but this is not the same as saying they were not marketed under the Holden brand.
As proof, I refer you to an image from an original WB Statesman brochure I have uploaded to Google Docs, which clearly says "Statesman by General Motors - Holden's". I have also uploaded an image of an advertisement for a HX Statesman from a 1977 Newsweek magazine which says the same too, as well as a brochure for a HZ Statesman Caprice which says "Statesman [GMH logo]", which was produced by General Motors-Holden's Sales Pty Ltd. 
Yes, I agree they weren't the "Holden Statesman" (although they were later called "Statesman by Holden), but I feel the wording of the text is misleading. I therefore request that this text either be updated accordingly, or deleted.
Blammy1 (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Statesman
Talk:Puerto Píritu

message: I agree with IP: 134.163.253.128, this article is much better without the template: Topics related to Venezuela.  Bejnar 05:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Topics Related to Venezuela

message: Note that the content added in this edit is a copyright violation from here and should not be re-added.  (This content has already been removed from teh article through ordinary editing.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Egg drop soup

message: Can Chinese characters for "egg drop soup" be added to this article?  Badagnani 05:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese characters

message: Can someone get a more appetizing picture of this soup to replace the existing one?
Please, someone do so! Why's it all brown and gross looking. Every egg drop soup I've ever ordered is a nice yellow and much more appetizing looking. 00:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Soup Picture Selection
Talk:Wise old man

message: What about Zeus and Christain God - they are always depictured as old men with long white beards... Aren't they examples of this archetype?Piotr mil (talk) 18:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Zeus & Co.

message: Senex is not the same thing as the wise old man archetype. Its similar but not the same.
:It's neither the same nor not the same, but something in between. The wise old man both has an objective function and a subjective function. The subjective function is how he is perceived (the senex); the objective function is what he does. He is perceived as such because what he does has meaning to the person he is instructing. Tcaudilllg (talk) 03:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wise old man/Senex 

message: . . .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.100.54 (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moe from the Simpsons.  Really?   

message: There's a new article at Wise Old Woman/Man. Possibly the "man" aspect from there, or possibly all of it, should be merged to here. I'm not an expert (at all) in this topic, so just noting, for others to weigh in on. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wise old woman 

message: Would it be pertinent to add content noting that Jung considered naming this archetype "Lucifer" in reference to the fact that it's meant to be a bringer of knowledge, but that he decided against it because of the negative connotation of the name when the concept is meant to be neutral? Akesgeroth (talk) 01:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lucifer
Talk:Explanation

message: ADD EXPLANATORY MYTHS!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.33.215 (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Descriptive theory. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 26#Descriptive theory until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 04:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Descriptive theory" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This study evaluates Citrus limon's effectiveness as a natural insect repellent against various insects, offering empirical support for its practical application as an alternative to traditional chemical-based products. 120.28.252.95 (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This study evaluates Citrus limon's effectiveness as a natural insect repellent against various insects, offering empirical support for its practical application as an alternative to traditional chemical-based products.
Talk:Widmore Corporation

message: Give me a good reason why this shouldn't exist if the Hanso Foundation page does. --SilvaStorm
:I think that the redirect was made because the page merely said that the Widmore Corporation was featured on Lost, leading the reader to click on Lost and go to that page.  Hanso Foundation's page also mentions its connection to Lost, but it also has a lot of information on it specific to the Foundation.  If you put together some information about Widmore itself, beyond merely its connection to the program, then by all means the page should stay. --Badger151 06:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Zorro's Fighting Legion

message: quote from the article: "creating a source of unintentional humor: each informant, upon uttering the phrase, "Don Del Oro is...", is shot by a golden arrow and dies" - - this statement is clearly an NPOV violation. Either you quote a reputable film critic who says so, for example Roger Ebert, and provide a clear source for it (website or newspaper article) - or don't use a judgmental phrase like "unintentional humor" at all. Why humor? And why unintentional? Republic Pictures just used a technique called "parallelization" to guarantee serial continuity. Whether there is any humor, intentional or unintentional, is a POV statement and not up to Wikipedia writers to decide. Wikipedia has to bring FACTS, not judgements! 19:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV  violation
Talk:Eliane Elias

message: I like the use of the word "consummate" in the first sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.142 (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Consumate" does not belong in an encyclopedia entry, but I agree with the opinion! More particularly, she is a consumate pianist. And what a wonderful posthumous keeper of Bill Evans's flame.132.181.160.42 (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article suggests she's married to two different people... so which one is she married to? 92.27.147.101 (talk) 23:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Married to who 

message: The biography at times reads like it was written by a promotional company, particularly the last two paragraphs. I propose some extensive editing to render it suitable for an encyclopedia entry. 90.47.62.91 (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this view: there is a lot of unsubstantiated opinion and unreferenced praise included, particularly after this article was edited by SecondOctaveTalent on 14 October 2014. This edit removed large sections of the previous article and substituted anodyne and flatteringly-expressed opinion. Second Octave happens to be Eliane Elias' commercial representative and their web site contains a promotional piece that is reproduced here almost verbatim. I propose that the previous version of the article should be fully reinstated and Second Octave barred from further editing of articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammysamak (talk • contribs) 02:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would file these comments under the title: "The clatter of dishes at a royal wedding".  Eliane is a national treasure and her music will live long after this page has been retired.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrywasserman (talk • contribs) 07:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   Why would this page retired? The above comment has to do with someone who had (and perhaps still has) a connection with the artist. That is considered to be a conflict of interest (see WP:COI). A Wikipedia article should be written from a neutral point of view and be encyclopaedic. And of course praise and rewards can be included in this, as long as they have reliable references and the article does not read as a hagiography. Karst (talk) 09:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style