Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography

message: Appealing to WP:NOTABILITY, these three biographies taken as an example which are in all the major encyclopedias Wiki linguistically edition except here, give me food for thought on the fact that biographies relating to porn have too severe cancellation problems. These three biography are widely relevant and important and notable. This makes me understand that a discussion is needed to unequivocally define whoever has been nominated for AVN Awards (who was universally definitely the "Oscar of Porn"), XBIZ (like as "Golden Globe of Porn") or XRCO, as notable and relevant and can have a page on this wiki. They have reached the highest level of notability in their reference sector. Therefore it must be written clearly that whoever is a candidate for these events is unequivocally notable for a pagine in Wikipedia.
5.91.118.61 (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability criteria for actor/actress porn

message: Is it worth making Rocky Emerson and Brittney Kade as articles? Dwanyewest (talk) 05:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The main deciding factor is available independent WP:RS coverage. I'm finding one GNews hit for Rocky Emerson in Marca, more needed. As for Brittney Kade, coverage consists of low-grade tabloids like the Daily Star and the Mirror. If you can point to better RS coverage, please share it. • Gene93k (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it worthy making an article? 

message: I am seeking guidance on the appropriateness and any suggestions for improvement/editing on the following proposed section: Talk:LiveJasmin#Latest_proposed_"Controversy"_section_after_a_number_of_suggestions Alexfotios (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am suggesting a new section for the [[LiveJasmin]] page 

message: Its been 45 days after the adjustment correction of the draft article Draft:Ebony Goddess Mystique. Meligirl5 (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review needed 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors#Requested move 20 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors#Requested move 20 March 2024]] 

message: Is Phoenix Marie now worthy of a Wikipedia article? Here are some sources Phoenix Marie Reflects on Career Milestones, Staying Power - XBIZ.com , Twenty Questions with Porn Superstar Phoenix Marie - Fleshbot , 2015 Adult Expo Interview: Phoenix Marie - Pornstar Interviews (adultdvdtalk.com) , Coolio Told Us About the Racists Who Tried to Stop His Pornhub Music Video Shoot (vice.com) , 10 Porn Stars Tell The Story Of How They Lost Their Virginity | HuffPost UK Weird News (huffingtonpost.co.uk) and is also AVN Awards , NightMoves Award, XBIZ Awards, Urban X Awards , XRCO Award, are awards Phoenix Marie has won. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think this would be the most significant item in support of notability: "Porn Star Takes Castmate to Court Over Shoot Gone Horribly Wrong", The Daily Beast (April 16, 2024). BD2412 T 01:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: BD2412 T I am not sure if it is worth the time or effort to make a new Phoenix Marie article? Dwanyewest (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you're asking whether such an article would survive a deletion effort, I think it is borderline based on the available sources. BD2412 T 22:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

text: WP:DAILYBEAST Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:   I am aware of the yellow-light status of the source. It is not, however, a prohibited source, and the events reported lend more to notability than the fluff from green-light sources. BD2412 T 01:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phoenix Marie