lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gospel Halls

message: I wrote that Gospel Hall is not limited to a particular group, but Baptists, Presbyterians, and even Pentecostals, have known to use the word "Gospel Hall" for their building. Please check my references, and see their credibility.
The tone of this article is rather misleading. While other groups may ocessionally call their buildings Gospel Hall, the name is usually associated with various groups whose origin can be traced back to the Plymouth Brethren movement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.167.40 (talk) 09:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: As a member of Saville Road Hall, Skelmanthorpe (which could be referred to as a gospel hall) I would like to make a couple of suggestions, that may, or may not be helpful.
The article does not read smoothly, could prove confusing and is lacking in certain necessary details, as follows:
Primarily there are different issues that face the description 'gospel hall' in different countries (for example in Canada or the USA the believers who meet in a Chapel are often very similar in belief and practice to those who meet in a Gospel Hall, however, those who meet in a Gospel Hall would tend to be less 'Open').
Including the term 'Gospel Hall Brethren' in the opening sentence is very misleading. A gospel hall is a building, not an organization - there is no such thing as a defined organization of Christian groups called 'The Gospel Halls' or even 'Gospel Halls' (which is why the title of the old article 'Gospel Hall' was better).  The saints/Christians/brethren/assembly/local church/company (for they will use any of these terms and others) that meet in the 'gospel hall' will be an independent gathering that will support and encourage other Christians in other places anywhere in the world that meet with the same principles. HOWEVER, each assembly is autonomous - they have no governing body or hierarchical structure that enables them to be filed under a particular denomination (usually there will be a group of Elders/Shepherds within the group who are responsible for it's guidance, though they are not seen to be 'above' any other church members. Often there is no Pastor/Minister but the responsibility of preaching is shared by able members of the assembly and surrounding assemblies).
I think it would be helpful to indicate at the end of the article that 'gospel hall' simply denotes a 'hall' where the message of the 'gospel' (good news) of Jesus Christ is preached.  It is often not a clear indication of the exact principles of those who meet in the building, but it does indicate an adherence to basic New Testament church teachings as laid out in the Holy Bible. (Similarly, I moved from Pamber Heath Gospel Hall and now meet at Saville Road Hall - no clues there - but we meet to the same principles.)
Layout Issues: The first sentence needs to be laid out as a paragraph. It currently merges too quickly with the following sentence which is concerning the term's history.
Josh.beckett (talk) 00:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Significantly Different
Talk:Y service

message: Apologies I just tried to add a Y station and have forgotten how to enter it correctly, I haven't done any editing in a long while! this needs to be added to Woodcock Hill Pandaplodder (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodcock Hill 

message: I believe there was also a Y Station (not mentioned in the list in the article) located near the GPO Receiving Station on Cooling Marshes in Kent. 2A00:23C6:B631:3101:4014:3D7D:8FA5:8019 (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooling Marshes in Kent 

message: It is just about impossible from the article to see which stations were ww1 and which ww2. I would imagine some existed during ww1 and more were built, but who knows?  The first two in ww1 seems to be stockton and hunstanton. 07:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ww1 vs ww2 

message: German wiki has articles on each station which I'm tempted to translate - the location for Denmark Hill is wrong I'm sure as it's the railway station https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark_Hill_Y_Station Secretlondon (talk) 18:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: German articles
Talk:John Sheard

message: "Sheard's recording history has led to over 200 records..." -- surely his recording history is the 200 records. They are not some accidental side effect. They are his career. So a rewording would run something like, "Sheard's recording history of over 200 records...", but then there would be no principal verb. Is there a way to re-word this sentence to give it a better focus?
Hughdbrown (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-wording, please
Talk:Buster Keaton filmography

message: I don't know if it's important enough to be in this lemma, but the Dutch colonial newspaper Bataviaasch Nieuwsblad of 22 february 1930 mentioned that Keaton was working on a comedy movie about the change from silent to sound movies, talkies (reminds of Gene Kelly's musical comedy 'Singing in the rain'). The movie was named 'On the set' with actors like Cecil B. de Mille, Lionel Barrymore i.a., led (directed?) by Edward Sedgwick.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.151.116.238 (talk) 11:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like that may have been the working title of "Free and Easy." Just a guess. ShelbyMarion (talk) 10:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about 'On the Set' Keaton in 1930? 

message: Is there a particular reason this page uses two completely different formats for the shorts vs. the features?  Surely it would be better to be consistent?128.151.71.16 (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The features section would benefit from the same format as the shorts section. What steadfast editor shall undertake this task? Morganfitzp (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I've done this for the films produced under Buster Keaton Productions. I'll let other editors have a crack at the rest. Morganfitzp (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Page layout
Talk:Goliath (Six Flags Fiesta Texas)

message: The ride has a chance of moving back to the former Six Flags New Orleans site as it is property of the City of New Orleans. Six Flags was recently sued and the city is preventing them from removing existing rides, and to return moved rides. DakotaDAllen (talk) 01:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ride Removal, Again.
Talk:Ultimate Ride

message: The precursor to this game was a game called Disney's Coaster (not to be confused with 2002's Disney Coaster). Screenshots on this page: http://www.jaygroh.com/rcsims.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.217.183 (talk) 07:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney's Coaster
Talk:Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters

message: Does the academy list the winners of its gold medals on-line? Doing so would make verification of claims simple. Many organizations list winners of their prizes on-line, and in doing so increase the profile of the competitions. For example, can the gold medal that MacTutor says Alexander Wilson (astronomer) won in 1771 be verified. Perhaps the Olaf Pederson book Lovers of Learning gives a list, but that book is not in my library.Rgdboer (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Their homepage does not seem to contain anything but the bare essentials. I have the Lovers of Learning book and I just checked, there is no list in that one either. However in its sources it lists a 5 volume Danish work on the history of the society, A. Lomholt (ed.), Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 1742-1942 - Samlinger til Selskabets historie (Collections in the history of the society), 1942-1973, which probably contains the information you are looking for. According to the information given in Lovers of Learning Volume III of the above work contains information about "special publications, scientific and scholarly projects, list of Prize Essays". --Saddhiyama (talk) 07:35, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have volume III of that work but volume I pp. 69-73 has a list of gold medal recipients and Alexander Wilson is listed under 1772. (18 February 1772 to be precise, according to p. 67.) So it seems MacTutor is only almost right. Peter Alberti (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold medals 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:P.S. Krøyer, Et møde i Videnskabernes Selskab, 1897, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskaberners Selskab.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for November 28, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-11-28. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:List of Kawasaki motorcycles

message: This was incorrectly placed in 2007 rather than 2006 as it started in 2006 not 2007 and is still a present model.  LwSiX (talk) 23:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ninja 650r/er-6

message: I notice the Kawasaki AE50 is not mentioned on the list of Kawasaki motorcycles.
The AE50 was a restricted (30mph in the UK) trial style 50cc learner bike.
Not sure of the production dates but my one was on a UK 'X' suffix plate which makes it circa 1981/82.
PaulHereNow (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AE50

message: I added all of these two stroke bikes since these were Kawasaki's first attempts at dual purpose and motocross bikes after Meguro was taken over
in the mid 1960s. The B8 was actually a rebadged Meguro design. I also expanded the A1/A7 model info with a brief description and added production years.H2RICK (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: F/G Series
Talk:Enterprise (1814)

message: Stumbling about the internet I encountered slightly earlier dates for the historic voyage of the Enterprise to New Orleans.  The accounts are from Florence L. Dorsey, Master of the Mississippi, which gives the departure from Pittsburg as 1 Dec 1814, and arrival in New Orleans as 14 Dec 1814, a voyage of 15 days, and has Shreve there in time to command a battery in the Battle of New Orleans.  The book is heavily footnoted and claims to use primary references, but have yet to get my hands on it and check the veracity.  Tomligon (talk) 03:07, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative dates for the trip to New Orleans
Talk:Area code 509

message: Below is the problematic text and reference taken from the article. Note that the reference does not verify the text.
The 509 code was created in a split from 206 in a flash-cut on January 1, 1957.
If you can provide a reference to verify this text please do so. Regards. – Allen4names (contributions) 18:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed verification
Talk:WIAL (FM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 02:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Sub-bass

message: The old 20Hz thing has long been regurgitated, about as long as it's been proven wrong. Not coincidentally, 16 Hz is a better and fairly accepted number, which is suspiciously close to "bottom" of music, C0 is within a rounding error of 16Hz. A solid source to 16Hz should be added, or more explanation given. Of course the title of this article is a recent phenomenon only existing due to subwoofers, for which 20Hz is usually a generously low bottom end. B137 (talk) 09:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious tag 

message: There is sub bass on all tracks from Chinese Democracy from GN'R (added by Chris Pitman). I think that should be included in the article. Wasp-1992 (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  sub bass  

message: What does it mean to give a number as Hz ± dB? — kwami (talk) 06:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification tag 

message: 12 Hz, 16 Hz or 20 Hz can't be heard. This is because a low frequency driver will always have audible second and third harmonic distortion - up to 5% in some cases.  There is no driver that can claim 0% - so, harmonic frequencies in isolation, at higher volumes, can be heard, and misinterpreted as the fundamental. Renkitch (talk) 16:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woofer distortion is what you hear
Talk:Central Tower (San Francisco)

message: See Talk:Spreckels Building, San Francisco, California#Merge articles? as I understand this building has a number of pages about it that might benefit from being one article. DVD 02:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles? 

message: It would be good to add a current photo to this article, showing how the building now looks. --98.232.176.109 (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the photo is current. tedder (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Current photo needed

message: The original Call Building was Baroque Revival and Beaux Arts, per The American skyscraper, 1850-1940: a celebration of height, page 212. In 1938 it was radically refurbished and "Art-Deco-ized" (same source). This is not mentioned in the article at all, and no assessment of the success of the 1938 refurb is given. No judgment is made as to whether the building changed from one combination of two styles to a standalone Art Deco work. At The Skyscraper Page, the building is classified as a combination of Streamline Moderne (a late Art Deco style) and neo-classicism, implying an incomplete transition.
My main complaint about the Art Deco category is that there is no discussion at all about Art Deco in the body of the article. We cannot go around assigning categories based on personal opinion, we must have expert sources at hand. Binksternet (talk) 03:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: i think that's a completely unnecessary level of pedanticism. one only need look at the building to see the style, but you can use this link for a source. --emerson7 04:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not too much to ask that a category be represented by article text. Not pedantic at all. Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art Deco? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sambahsa-mundialect

message: Sellamat! I am actually the author of the page and, as such, I don't take a stand. From the comments above, I suppose I was misled by the fact that auxlangs with no speaker have an article (ex: Europaio whose friendly creator adviced me to publish my work on the Net; not to mention "fantasy auxlangs" like Wenedyk of our friend Jan). I would just recommend that guidelines for deletion should be redefined, especially about notability. In general, people on the street have only heard about esperanto while "auxlangers" communicate nowadays through the Net (for auxlangs are by nature a matter of international concern) and have thus seen a lot of projects. Concerning articles by third parties, don't forget that the ability to make journalists or scholars pay attention to his/her project is not revealing of the quality of the language itself, as Jan has already said. (I'd like to add that I did not create the language to go on Wikipedia, for I began working on it when Wikipedia did not yet exist :-))
If auxlangs like Slovio don't deserve an article, I don't bother about deletion nor merging of the page.  
Do what you have to do.
Best regards
Mundialecter 18:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture

message: Can anyone find a source to explain which actors in a film are eligible for the cast award, and which actors are not included? is there a minimum criterion according to screen time, or lines spoken? 206.174.101.84 (talk) 09:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which of a film's actors are eligible?
Talk:Golden Globe Award for Best Actor in a Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy

message: Is there any reason that no year after 1955 is unreferenced? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 21:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced years
Talk:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Song

message: 59th winner was Sting's Until. Changed it from May it Be. Who wrote this, anyway? --203.34.37.96 (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  59th 

message: This page needs to be complete reworked.  Composers of the songs should be listed as nominees, not the performers. For example, Stephen Sondheim wrote the songs nominated from 1990's Dick Tracy, not Madonna.98.208.122.251 (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship
Talk:Golden Globe Award for Best Animated Feature Film

message: You got this, guys? Espngeek (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Porn Hub Troll
Talk:Golden Globe Cecil B. DeMille Award

message: It seems that the angel on top has been removed. See pictures of Oprah Winfrey accepting the award last night. 216.165.95.161 (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design of statuette has changed 

message: There is an appalling lack of consistency with which the award is presented (or totally ignored!) on all the ceremonies. Here is the List of Golden Globe Awards ceremonies. Take a look, find the most appropriate format and placement, and then create a uniform presentation on ALL of them. Don't forget to include it on the years (1976 & 2008) it was not awarded and/or postponed, and mention why it happened. -- Brangifer (talk) 04:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good, easy, job.... 

message: Jodie Foster is listed under "2013". Did I fall asleep for a year or something? — WylieCoyote (talk) 00:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years are off. 

message: I'm not starting an edit war so discuss it here if you must. – zmbro (talk) 23:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for the consideration, Yeah I don't understand your vague claim that its "unnecessary", given the many decades of the Golden Globe Awards ceremony, it makes sense to divide it by decade somewhat so the viewer can easily look through the winners.The One I Left (talk) 23:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Golden Globe Award for Best Documentary Film

message: see title  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.178.12.2 (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the Award retired? 

message: The Info Box says Currently held by: Altars of the World (1976).  Seems a bit odd that the award is "currently held" by a 50-year-old film.  Perhaps it should be reworded:  Currently held by: Award Category Discontinued / [or Retired] in 1977.  Or some such.  Thanks.    32.209.69.24 (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Box
Talk:Hollywood Foreign Press Association

message: Does anyone else think this article needs to be expanded for balance? LA Movie Buff (talk) 06:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for expansion for balance 

message: I have removed the following text from the article because it appeared to be a bad cut-and-paste job from elsewhere (leading spaces were causing every paragraph to be rendered as preformatted text). Interested editors can look this over (copyvio?) and add back the material (with proper wiki syntax) that belongs in the article. - dcljr (talk) 23:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly formatted text move to here 

message: I don't have time to update the article right now, but the recent LA times article and associated news stories showing that the HFPA has no black members and has been paying huge sums of money to its members for favorable reviews should be included here. Right now the page reads like an ad for the association. Refs:--Found5dollar (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems like a publicity stunt for HFPA. How many members does it have? It all depends whether it said 4 or 104 members! I am extremely informed & hadn't heard of HFPA till today! Season 13 of The Real Housewives of Atlanta (season 13) has fewer than 10 cast members & they are all African-American women. I don't believe either RHOA is racially motivated, though.--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:708E:2510:279C:4124 (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

text: HFPA has 87 members.--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:708E:2510:279C:4124 (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  there are no black members of the HFPA
Talk:Witez II

message: And a horse has its own article... why?
-G
Because he's as famous in the horse world as any grammy winning artist. Ealdgyth | Talk 00:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note that there are probably over 200 Thoroughbred race horses with their own articles, some of far less significance to horse racing than this horse has been to the Arabian horse breed. Montanabw(talk) 01:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:Hazardous air pollutants

message: At first it seems to make sense to put every chemical mentioned in the lists (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and National Ambient Air Quality Standards) into this category, by adding category links.
The lists seem to apply common sense, given that everything can be toxic or objectionable. They seem to include air pollutants that are regulated BECAUSE they have a direct toxicity AND are commonly produced, thus omitting CO2 and ethane because they are not toxic, and Tellurium and TNT because no one emits them.
However, I feel uncomfortable when I contemplate adding all those Category links. This category is general, and its criteria are official. The lists are published by a national government agency (US EPA), which is non-neutral (the whole world breathes air) and more prone to political bias than an international scientific organization.
I can't think of a way to rename the category to make it make sense. (Regulated Hazardous air pollutants)?? (USEPA Hazardous air pollutants)??
If someone links the listed substances into this category, I would not remove them. I'm just not comfortable enough to systematically add all of them -- someone might rename the category or change the criteria again. I might link in the most "obvious" or "universal" pollutants. Whiner01 18:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles are not linked -vs- Criteria are political
Talk:Melinda

message: Melinda name usage in Romanian is not documented. It is used only by Transylvanian Hungarians in Romania as a first name and not by Romanians. The usage of this name by Romanians is virtually zero. There is no name day for Melinda in Romanian calendars. The given name list does not contain a Romanian personality with that christian name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PagerAntal (talk • contribs) 12:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

message: Someone named Melinda wrote this article, didn't they? Blackmorningsun (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a guess

message: My name is Melinda,and I agree,Melinda is the best name ever. It just isn't a popular name. Pretty asiangirl (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm Melinda

message: "or from Melissa meaning "honeysuckle" in Greek."   This is incorrect.  Melissa means Bee (honeybee)  in Greek, not Honeysuckle ( agioklima ) I am going to fix this.  75.76.55.126 (talk) 01:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect information