Talk:Earl Browder

message: The text reading, "In April 1950, Browder was called to testify before a Senate Committee investigating Communist activity. Questioned by Joseph McCarthy (D-Minn), Browder openly criticized the American Communist Party" is in error. Senator Joseph McCarthy was NOT a Democrat from Minnesota but a Republican from Wisconsin. The writer apparently confused the rabid anticommunist known as the progenitor of "McCarthyism" with the Minnesota Democrat who opposed President Lyndon B Johnson in the New Hampshire primary of 1968, Eugene McCarthy, no relation to "Tailgunner Joe". I made the necessary correction.LAWinans (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: Does anyone know where an audio recording of the debate mentioned in this article is avaible?
The text reads "led the CPUSA's tactic of expressing cautious support for the New Deal" in a context after 1940. This is a little bit late in time, seeing New Deal programs generally stem from the period before the 1937 recession. By 1940 many programs were not that popular anymore and international events overtook the public dialogue. perhaps that phrase should be moved up in time. Nobs01 19:59, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio recording? 

message: I added links to some of the articles referenced in the text, like the Duclous (sic) letter and the Shachtman debate. I compacted the Venona stuff into one paragraph chonologically placed within his tenure as general secretary. The article now ends with his death in 1973. I also added archival information and the audio link to the speech excerpt because it is interesting. I deleted the reference to 'entering the Democratic Party as a left-wing faction'. Its clear that the CPA was supporting Roosevelt, but not in any formal way from 'within the party'. American parties have very lax membership rules and they don't recognize factions. Anyone can speak and work as thought they are in the Democratic or Republician Parties (Lyndon LaRouche and David Duke, for example). I moderated, but did not eliminate, the sentence on McCarthites being proved right in interest of NPOV. DJ Silverfish 21:37, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 6 edits 

message: Please use the "quadruple ~" notation to sign edits, as per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. It makes the attribution clearer.) DJ Silverfish 17:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing edits 

message: "Browder is alleged to have been involved in constructing an underground branch of the CPUSA, called the secret apparatus. [15][16] This branch was intended to assist the Soviet Union in maintaining dominance of the CPUSA in policy issues..."
Holy Jesus. The CPUSA was not only dominant on policy issues in the 1930swow, it was maintaining its dominance. Were the Democrats catching up?
Take a look at the source for this:
17^ Klehr, Harvey; Haynes, John E., and Igorevich, Fridrikh I. (1995). The Secret World of American Communism. Yale University Press. pp. ????. ""????""
18^ Klehr, Harvey; Haynes, John E., and Igorevich, Fridrikh I. (1995). The Secret World of American Communism. Yale University Press. pp. ????. ""????""
Whoa, whoa, whoa. What kind of page numbers are those...? As DJ Silverfish writes (some three years ago, in 2006), "The VENONA references cite the five or six books repeatedly. Since these books are large and and the details referenced are so specific, casual researchers should not have to read the entire book to find the supporting reference. Since evidently editor 4.240.243.207 has access to the material, citing the page numbers, and the supporting quote, should not be too much of a burden. Inclusion of the supporting quote should also indicate whether or not the languate is a direct transcription of the source material."
Taking a look at the rest of the paragraph, I see that a "citation" of this sort is inserted on virtually every sentence, yet nowhere do we get the page numbers. What we get are more "???", "???", and "???"I will be deleting the bogus claim that the CPUSA in the 1930s was in a Herculean struggle to...maintain...its...dominance over "policy"Joe McCarthy, is that youbut I'm not quite sure how to deal with this. Since Wikipedia is a collectivist (if bourgeois) little thing, input would be appreciated. Meanwhile, POV tag. Way unbalanced and ridiculous. PasswordUsername (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTH is this, Senator? 

message: This is not a pissing contest between conservatives and liberals. The espionage section is improperly footnoted due to the lack of page numbers. Piling on 3 titles with no page numbers on each assertion does NOT fix the problem, it just makes things messier and less likely to get fixed. So I am BEING BOLD and pulling all that out and replacing it with CITATION NEEDED tags where I feel the footnote is needed.
I am not expressing doubt about Browder's involvement in espionage activities. He was. I am saying that this aspect of the article is controversial with some, clearly, and the case needs to be CORRECTLY DOCUMENTED. This means, please, cite your sources correctly—including page numbers in each and every instance.
I would further suggest that footnotes be made in the standard form for each case [ref>Author, Title, page.</ref] rather than using the shortcut for subsequent uses for the same source. It makes things hard to read and check and the savings in terms of editor time at the front or cleanliness at the back in the footnotes section are clearly not worth the mess it makes of the code. Just go long form with everything, it helps. Not to mention the fact that Messrs. Haynes and Klehr have written more than one book... Just list Author, Title, Page spelled out 11 times in a row if you have to.
Now as for POV, this has been blown out of proportion. Browder was a political leader, and that needs to be covered, and he was also tight with espionage, and that needs to be covered. Both things. I don't think the current presentation is all that bad—ONCE THE FOOTNOTES ARE FIXED.
Please don't revert to the previous mess, just dig out your Haynes and Klehr books and look up the appropriate page numbers for each citation. An hour or two and this multi-year whine-fest will be over.
Okay? Okay! Hike!!! —Tim Davenport /// Early American Marxism website /// Corvallis, OR Carrite (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Right, Let's Get This Thing Cleaned Up 

message: Why can we link this speech by Earl Browder posted on youtube? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cR8nqDkK8v0 It will actually give readers a chance to hear his voice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.13.211 (talk) 05:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speech from 1947, Link? 

message: I have learned he begot three bright sons that became Mathemaicians.
Who was the mother ?
Kitty Harris ?
Is Kitty Harris an alias for Catherine Harrison that was said to have betrayed Browder with a report to the Kremlin ?
:: Read the book "Kitty Harris: The Spy with seventeen names", by Igor Damaskin. I don't think she had any children. Her cover was blown by Krivitsky and she may well have written a report for the Kremlin for taking her in. 58.174.193.2 (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That book is very clear on the marriage between Earl Browder and Kitty Harris, I wouldn't call the marriage 'unconfirmed' as on Harris' page. Maybe someone should ask Igor Damaskin where he had it from. 2001:8003:A0B9:EF00:A179:4C25:38D7:9B53 (talk) 06:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about his wife? 

message: I've completed a fairly massive expansion. This is a big figure and there's still more work to do, but it's starting to get a little better. There was an UNDUE EMPHASIS flag up on the espionage material for the longest time; with the massive revision, I fell that the proportion of that section to the total story is now appropriate. There are still CITATION NEEDED flags showing; one of these days I'll dig out Venona and do it myself, unless Nobs1 feels energetic in the meantime. Soviet intelligence didn't use CPUSA as its primary recruiting arm after the early 1930s, understanding full well that the party was heavily penetrated by FBI informants, and it would be a mistake to think Browder was the Supreme Master Kingpin of Soviet intelligence in the USA. He was no such thing. When someone came forward with information for the party/Soviets, he put them in touch with Golos, who in turn kept Browder in the loop of the information he was himself sending. There were parallel networks and channels. Browder absolutely was complicit, but his first and foremost function was as a (or the) top leader of CPUSA. Carrite (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 2012 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earl Browder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330161416/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/venona/1944/29apr_recruits.pdf to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/venona/1944/29apr_recruits.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified