lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Dayton, Ohio

message: I was born in 1946 and in my early teens, the Steele High School building was still standing.  I think it was demolished when Rike's bought the property and constructed a parking structure.  The turrets at the corners of the building were very memorable.  I know there are several internet sites that claim the building was demolished in the late 1940s, but I think it was more like 1958 or 1959.
David (talk) 18:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steele High School demoliton 
Talk:Melissa Wu

message: * Support as above. The fictional character is even up for deletion with several other maintenance tags on the page. JRawle (Talk) 10:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: i think Melissa is a great diver  at just 16 she has already gone to the Olympics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.177.52 (talk) 08:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what i think about Melissa Wu
Talk:Micah Balfour

message: Dear WIKI
This article has erroneous details relating to Micah's parents. 
As his his father's brother, I can confirm that both his father and Mother are Afro Carribbean.
Please ensure that the person that entered the erroneous details is advised and the info is amended forthwith.
Thanks in advance
DPB
86.133.219.21 (talk) 15:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parental details incorrect.
Talk:Michael Bowden (footballer)

message: Hey guys, I just added a link to the baseball player Michael Bowden, so it's easier for people to get to his article when they type in "Michael Bowden" in the search page.  I clicked on the Aussie Rules link and there was a thing on top with a similar heading, so I just copied and pasted that format.  Hope this is OK.  Thanks guys Username9238432 (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Hester

message: User:Zombie433 - You have added to this page that Hester was a professional Rugby League player, and referenced this with his FIFA profile. The reference, however, supports neither the professional claim, nor the Rugby League claim - it only says he is a "former rugby player". Whilst I accept that he may have been both those things, and even played internationally, I can find no true reference for any of these claims, and "former rugby player" could easily be amateur and Rugby union as opposed to professional and Rugby League. Please provide a valid reference that actually verifies the claims or it will again be removed under WP:V which "requires that anything challenged...be attributed to a reliable source....and that the source directly support the material in question" --ClubOranjeT 13:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: this (page 33) is the most comprehensive bio I can find and it fails to mention anything about Rugby Union or League - in fact it claims he realised his limitations as a football player and turned to refereeing to stay involved in the game.--ClubOranjeT 13:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rugby League claim
Talk:Claus Bergen

message: Why was photo of Claus Bergen removed from infobox?
::I don't know.  I put it back, and filled out more info in the box. auntieruth (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Armando de Armas Romero

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 05:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Christopher Rees

message: I am rewriting the content. I didn't realise the similarities to the linked page - I gathered some of the facts I wrote about from a press release I was sent. Please don't delete this page yet. thanks.
Cwtch 22:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia articles should not be written from press releases but from reliable verifable third party sources.  (Oh - and please sign Talk pages but not article pages.  Thanks.  B1atv 22:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did a Google search and they guy has a page on BBC Wales, which is a reliable source. I have taken the speedy delete tag off but a lot of work is still needed to get the article up to standard. --DanielRigal 22:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BBC Wales do "minisites" for "upcoming unsigned artists".  The artists themselves upload the content so this can't be considered a source of notability.  B1atv 22:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm. I didn't know that. So does the fact that they allowed him a "minisite" indicate any degree notability at all, or do they hand them out to anybody who asks? Do you think that Speedy Delete should go back on? Would it be better to put Prod on instead? That way, the author has 5 days to get the article up to scratch. Would that just be holding out false hope? --DanielRigal 22:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The BBC Wales music sites have some element of editorial control but it is there to support local bands; so it isn't the same as a BBC News article.  I suspect the article now has to go through AFD but I'm going to read it through again and may think about it afresh tomorrow.  B1atv 23:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There appears now to be some minor sources.  I will get around to adding them in the next few days, but lest I forget (or if somebody else gets here first) here they are:
* The Brighton Argus Interview
* The Western Mail Review of The Police concert at Millennium Stadium by "Music Critic Christopher Rees" (same chap?)
* Wales on Sunday Gig Guide entry
B1atv 17:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Fountains Hall

message: Lady Doris Vyner was the wife of Commander Clare Vyner. My understanding from the link in the article is that the title of became extinct in 1923. Has there been some mistake? JF42 (talk) 21:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marquess of Ripon 
Wikipedia talk:Notability (in popular culture)

message: Quoted from Wikipedia:Notability:
Notability guidelines give guidance on whether a topic is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia as a separate article, but do not specifically regulate the content of articles, which is governed by other guidelines such as those on using reliable sources and on handling trivia. The particular topics and facts within an article are not each required to meet the standards of the notability guidelines.
We cannot have a "notability guideline" for article sections. I think that this proposal is driving at something similar to Wikipedia:Relevance of content. Limitations on article content are best discussed in that context, rather than in the context of notability, which carries a fairly specific meaning. Black Falcon (Talk) 20:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content
Portal talk:Ireland/Archive1

message: Anyway, where's the Shelta? At least as deserving of inclusion. Palmiro | Talk 21:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion! Whenever you feel an article needs changing... you know where this is going :) I can't seem to find any online Shelta computing resources, so 'fraid I can't help. Anyone for a Yola version? --Kwekubo 18:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yola version? That would be fun! Wait... there's no Yola Wikipedia! Should we write one? Palmiro | Talk 18:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Airland wha? 

message: Given there is now a Portal:Northern Ireland, would it not be reasonable to refactor Portal:Ireland to be specifically for the Republic of Ireland? Or does it require a subportal as well?--cj | talk 09:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but would you be opposed to this portal becoming the portal for the Republic of Ireland (without loss to Northern Ireland which is now covered exclusively at Portal:Northern Ireland). Alternatively, it can remain generic and Portal:Republic of Ireland could be created as a subportal (alongside Portal:Northern Ireland). Personally, I favour the former option.--cj | talk 05:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, but I don't how to set up a portal, so on you're bike, man and more power to ya. - Dalta 18:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Ireland?

message: Being the metapedian I am, I thought it would be nice to have a different font on the page. I'm at a loss as to the name of the one I'm thinking of, but what does everyone think?  —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♪-) 15:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Font? 

message: Here's a link to the Ireland portal's subpages. S.D. ¿п? § 02:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subpages
Talk:Archaeobiology

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: These are pretty much synonymous. Environmental archaeology is far more commonly used (46 million google hits. ~6400 for 'Archaeobiology) and has several inter-language links. However, this article has some decent content that should be kept. PatHadley (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Environmental Archaeology]]
Talk:Rievaulx Terrace

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Edward Dębicki

message: I moved this to the correct category.  It had been in a category of Polish people of Romanian descent.  There's nothing in the article to suggest he's of Romanian descent.  The article does indicate that he is Romani.  Not the same thing at all.  140.147.236.194 (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romani, not Romanian
Talk:Nikolay Atanasov

message: *"Nikolay Atanasov-Joko". Is Joko a nickname or really part of his name?
*If 10.56 is not a part of his WA profile, which builds on Tillastopaja data, it can not be considered an official PB. It has to be verified with date, location and wind. People can write all kinds of things in various profiles but we need to have this as solid as possible. Geschichte (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Atlanta (board game)

message: I have found several old reviews. My undestanding is that both of these were substantial multi-page reviews. However, I have not yet discovered copies of the relevant issues of either Conflict or Strategy & Tactics yet. The reference to BOard Game Geek is used because the information in their database about games, designers, artists and production staff has proved to be accurate in the past.Guinness323 (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks. If you think they are substantial reviews based on what you've seen in other issues that's good enough for me. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ping @VickKiang: should we remove the template notability? WP:AGFing Guiness' claim that the reviews are likely to be sustantial. Assuming the sources can be considered reliable (probably, old zine/magazines)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:List of science fiction films before 1920

message: I see Phil Hardy's Overlook Film Encyclopedia is used as a source.  That book lists 192 pre-1920 science fiction films.  Are the ones listed the only ones considered notable?--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just been adding them as I find them, but there probably are some other notable sci-fi films from this period that aren't on the list yet.—RJH (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List parameters
Talk:Duncombe Park

message: The article says "The second Earl was killed in the First World War and the earldom became extinct on the death of the third earl in 1963......the house has been restored as a family home by the 6th Baron Feversham, but on his death in 2009 was left, not to his heir Jasper Duncombe, 7th Baron Feversham, but to a younger son Jake Duncombe."
I don't get it. What does it mean the Earldom extinct if there is an extant family alive today who own the property???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.16.187.98 (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused
Talk:House of Normandy

message: Can anybody add in the info about the Norman dynasty prior to 1066? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk • contribs) 
:The dynasty didn't exist until 1066. If you were referring to the Normans in Noramdy, the information should be on Duchy of Normandy.-- OsirisV (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No it was founded by Rollo the Viking. The definition of a dynasy is a succession of rulers from the same family or line. And all the dukes of Normandy were from the same male line descent from Rollo. This article is too anglocentric.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article split is based on title - a duke becoming king of some other country was considered enough to separate the two house articles. I suppose the information could be merged, given that it seems to be only based on title.-- OsirisV (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pre 1066 

message: Source for the descent of the Viscounts Devereux from Rollo. I cannot find Agnatic or Cognatic connections. EdgarÆtheling 25 (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viscounts Devereux
Talk:List of science fiction films of the 1920s

message: I know that there was at least one science fiction movie before the 20s. (It was in television a few years ago)
But I can´t find it. (in the net)
Though it has kind of a well known name I can´t remember it.
:Was it this? Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  science fiction movies before the 20s
Talk:List of science fiction films of the 1930s

message: The List of film serials article covers the topic of serials pretty well, and it includes a number of Sci-Fi serials that are not listed here. Should we be including those on this list, or removing the current serials from here? Thanks.—RJH (talk) 22:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Film serials: to include or not to include?
Talk:List of science fiction films of the 1950s

message: Back in the late 1960s or very, very early 1970s, I saw a movie on WJBK 2 Detroit that I don't remember the title of.  TV Guide's description was of "two adventurers swept away from Earth onto a comet". At the beginning of the movie, a "comet" appears in the sky and begins drawing things, including the two men, away from Earth and up to the comet. There, they find cavemen and dinosaurs, as well as a similar geology - volcanoes, oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere. They fight for survival and to work with the cave tribe. I have perused the titles in this, the 1940s and 1960s lists, and not found anything that seems to resemble that plot. Anyone know of this movie? GBC (talk) 06:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  anyone know of this one? 

message: An anonymous editor has been making a series of edits that have the net effect of placing the list out of sort order and deleting at least two valid entries. Sort order has been long established for these lists and the new arrangement did not provide any sort of perceived benefit. No explanation has been provided for the changes and this editor did not respond to a warning. Hence, I'm going to treat this as a case of either disruptive editing or subtle vandalism. Regards, RJH (talk) 15:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive edits
Talk:Pennsylvania-class cruiser

message: I reverted the article to remove the following sentence:
According to the following article, all were not scrapped between 1930 and 1931 because the U.S.S. Arizona was of this class of ship. https://www.facebook.com/223598107688462/posts/2012994095415512/
First of all, the USS Arizona (BB-39) was a member of the Pennsylvania BATTLESHIP class, not the Pennsylvania Armored Cruiser class, which this article is about.  The preceding paragraph in the article even explains that the cruisers were renamed after cities to free up the names for the battleships.  The Facebook-linked warhistoryonline.com article refers to the "Pennsylvania class of warships", which is the cause of the confusion between classes (and reason enough not to consider it a valid reference).  
In addition, (1) format: the article places references at the bottom, not linked within the text, (2) tone: it sounds like the article is having an argument with itself, and (3) the linked Facebook post is not a reference, but a link to yet another site.
108.102.226.126 (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennsylvania armored cruiser class versus battleship class
Talk:List of science fiction films of the 1960s

message: Does The Flesh Eaters (film) belong here? Thanks.—RJH (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From a couple google searches it seems to be mostly referred to as a horror film. reading the wiki's plot summaries seems to have a mild science fiction edge, but if I can't cite it, feel free to remove it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it's not currently on the list, but it did pop up in a book on Sci-Fi films. I'll leave it off. Thanks.—RJH (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: The following entry was added yesterday, but I have been unable to confirm it exists. Thus it does not appear to satisfy the list requirements. The title points to the article on "Power" rather than a film.
The Power	Byron Haskins	George Hamilton, Suzanne Pleshette, Richard Carlson		
RJH (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Undid removal & corrected link.  Evil-yuusha (talk) 07:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Power" 

message: A 1964/65 SF film is missing. (88.17.88.113 (talk) 17:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay it's on the list. Thanks for the catch.—RJH (talk) 20:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crack in the World 

message: The following comment was left on the article under the "See also" section. I'm moving it here.
:The Movie:  The Lost World 
:The Year:  1960
:The Cast:  Michael Rennie, Jill St. John, David Hedison, Claude Rains
:I did not see this movie listed in the 1960's Sci-Fi Movie List, therefore I am adding this to this list.
A corresponding entry has been inserted into the table for 1960. Regards, RJH (talk) 21:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:List of science fiction films of the 1980s

message: geekiest wikipedia topic ever = geekiest past time ever.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.116.67 (talk) 12:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: oh, I don't know. There is the list of minor-star wars droids that is longer then then the history of the world article! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Silliest comment ever

message: I was unable to find a suitably reliable citation for this red linked film. One of the blog comments I saw is that it was a spoof of Dr. Who that was hastily put together and lacks significant production values. Does anybody have a suitable citation that would demonstrated notability per WP:FILM? If not then I think it should be removed.—RJH (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On searching, I found very very little info as well. considering the amount of Dr.Who information on wikipedia and the lack of this apparent parody, I'm going to consider this non-notable. Feel free to remove it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: S-A-V-E-W-H-O

message: Several sources discussing the science fiction setting of Element of Crime. Exploring the Limits of the Human Through Science Fiction, Von Trier Interviews, Science fiction, horror & fantasy film and television credits supplement. Allmovie refers to it as a tech-noir. I'd agree it's not primarily science fiction, but it's allowed to be placed here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, not allmovie, but the two above describe this film as science fiction. Tech-noir is a type of science fiction, but I understand what you mean. (I think!). Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Element of crime
Talk:List of science fiction films of the 1990s

message: Does Delicatessen (film) belong here? Thanks.—RJH (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's been described as taking place in a "dystopian future" but other then that, I've never really seen the science fiction label applied to it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: I tagged the following films with a  because they are television films and so don't appear to satisfy the base criteria of this list (as given on List of science fiction films) for a theatrical list:
: City Cat, Harrison Bergeron, Doctor Who, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and Brave New World.
It is also unclear whether they satisfy the film notability criteria. Unless there is a strenuous objection, I think they should be removed here and be placed on a separate list of  made for television science fiction films.—RJH (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your reasoning. Go forth and move them! Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television films 

message: Should My Favorite Martian (film) be placed on this page? It has some sci-fi elements, even though primarily it is a comedy.—RJH (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Include it. Films with any alien visitor are generally part of some sci-fi cannon, even if the idea is taken simply for laughs. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Favorite Martian