lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Root beer

message: A rhetorical question... the article mentions this five or six times when it probably only needs to be mentioned once or twice. Stub Mandrel (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is anything added to root beer to make it foamy? 

message: This article says Yucca and yuca are used for foaming but like, both Yucca and cassava/yuca are different so this article needs to be consistent on that. One of them is wrong I guess it's either one or the other 2806:2F0:6120:853C:D5E6:A74F:E3B8:793B (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. It was yucca. Kornatice (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look in the archives you'll see this has come up before.  Might be worth looking through the history to see who is doing it and whether it looks like a long-term vandal, or maybe just someone who thinks it's spelled wrong and "corrects" it every now and then. --Trovatore (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yucca/yuca 

message: This provides useful sources https://medium.com/jill-burrows/root-beers-indigenous-roots-bfd6e8ba8de4 [IP redacted] 15:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  indigenous history needs to be added  

message: Change "Root beer is a sweet North American soft drink traditionally made using the root bark of the sassafras tree"
to " Root beer is a sweet North American soft drink traditionally made using the root and bark of the sassafras tree"
This is because 1) It is unsourced that they use specifically the outer bark of the root 
and 2) It is sourced how they use the root AND bark of the sassafras tree, and one can see how the mistake of "root bark" can be made. 3) looking at recipes online for root beer using actual bark, they all state to use the whole root, not just the bark of the root. Qwemep (talk) 05:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  Spintendo  07:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2023 

message: Root beer looks to be a regional variety of Sarsaparilla and should probably be merged. A subsection detailing the flavourings and adulterants used in USA formulations can be made. Kommando (talk) 12:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest Root Beer page merge under Sarsaparilla page. 

message: The article mentions the common ingredients but doesn't really provide information on how root beer is manufactured nowadays. Does it undergo a brewing / fermentation process like normal beer or is it prepared like other soft drinks, i.e. by simply mixing water, sugar and flavors. --2001:871:22B:9A5E:111:2A2D:7D23:C2DE (talk) 23:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturing process
Template talk:Monty Python

message: This template was nominated for deletion on October 26, 2004. The consensus was to keep it:
*Template:MontyPython (and redir MediaWiki:MontyPython - prime use for See also section and categories. -- Netoholic @ 20:05, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC)
**Keep Template:MontyPython, its a useful navbox, there is no reason to delete navboxes.   —siroχo 08:55, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
**Delete - this is nothing but a vanity box. Snowspinner 23:52, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
**convert to footer. --Jiang 05:57, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for deletion

message: I noticed the removal of his name from the template, and not being familiar with any contributions, went looking. I found a brief mention in our article at Monty Python's Flying Circus#The landing of The Flying Circus, and more complete explanation at http://montypython.wikia.com/wiki/Douglas_Adams 
I'm not sure if that warrants his inclusions, so will just leave these notes here for consideration. -- Quiddity (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, he was one of their writers. - Denimadept (talk) 19:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm more concerned about the inclusion of Neil Innes, who wasn't ever considered a "full member" until quite recently.  If he merits inclusion in the template, certainly Connie Booth and Charles McKeown also merit inclusion.  And Douglas Adams would warrant the same consideration. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douglas Adams 

message: How do we establish how related an article is to Monty Python? Bert Fegg's book is rather obscure, even though it was written by Michael Palin and Terry Jones. Should related articles be limited only to sketch shows the group has done? 2.97.166.22 (talk) 22:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related Articles
Talk:Gregg Alexander

message: He never worked with the Hollies, a meeting doesnt constitute colaboration.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.130.211.218 (talk • contribs) .
:It says in a press release on their official homepage that Alexander was one of the co-writers on their upcoming album. --Fritz S. (Talk) 19:01, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like you have some inside information...? If they really never worked together it should be removed from the article. --Fritz S. (Talk) 14:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Turns out he did write several songs on their new album, Staying Power, but these were all originally written for Enrique Iglesias' album 7. --Fritz S. (Talk) 14:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hollies

message: "His father, Tony, was a plumber and his mother, Sharon, a Jehovah's Witness."
Is being a JW a type of career now?
Or is a plumber some kind of new age religion?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jack Meihoffer (talk • contribs) .
:was about to make the same comment. Chensiyuan 17:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be true, but the existing reference does not back that up (or his birthdate, for that matter). -- Calion | Talk 16:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life and career. 

message: Someone needs to erase the "iz well masturbate" from the first part....i can't figure it out—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.255.97.141 (talk • contribs).
"Recently, Alexander has been ghostwriting music for Paramore"...
Can we get anymore info on this? This is the only time this has been brought up on the internet, and is pretty vague.--174.100.37.181 (talk) 23:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post new radicals 

message: There used to be a link under the heading "List of Songs" to a page with a list of songs Gregg wrote. Does anyone know what happened to that link?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.138.92 (talk) 07:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a bot moved it to the top of the article . --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can it be put back? This is worthwhile information on the artist. -- Calion | Talk 17:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Songs 
Talk:Blu-ray

message: The number of lines and fields/frames, AND the colour encoding system for analogue signals, were set down by the national television standards committee - NTSC for short. (The "nation" involved is I believe the USA, but the term is more widely applied.) It is thus appropriate to refer to BOTH the resolution and the colour system as "NTSC".
PAL, however, stands for "phase - alternate line", and refers only to a colour encoding system; "phase, alternate line" does not mean anything when applied to a resolution. The resolution 576i is often incorrectly referred to as "PAL", but we should not promulgate such in an encyclopaedia.
you can have 480i PAL (as indeed Brazil did): NTSC resolution with PAL colour encoding; you can have 576i with NTSC colour encoding, though no-one did beyond the experimental stage (France and some other countries had 576i with SECAM colour, as opposed to PAL which was commoner).
To quote from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAL, "CCIR 625/50 and EIA 525/60 are the proper names for these (line count and field rate) standards; PAL and NTSC on the other hand are methods of encoding colour information in the signal." However, these terms are rarely used. It is valid to refer to 525/60 - or 480i - as "NTSC" since that body defined it; however, it is not valid to refer to 625/50 (576i) as "PAL".
G6JPG (talk) 22:39, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically, that is correct. However, correctness is relative and not only created by technical definition but also by common use. Even the article PAL begins with it was broadcast at 625 lines, 50 fields (25 frames) per second [...], qualifies that at the end of the lede, and only mentions the exception for Brazil way down the text. I'd suggest using less surprising wording like 576i (commonly used with PAL). Technical nitpicking is out of place here in this article. --Zac67 (talk) 06:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: clarification of the term "PAL"

message: https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1860150#post1860150 109.252.169.138 (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.1 profile 

message: I believe the 8K Blu-ray format as settled by the Blu-ray Disc Association should be mentioned in the article, even though this specification is currently released for Japan only. Source: Blu-ray Disc Association Settles on 8K Format --Wengier (talk) 01:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of 8K Blu-ray?
Talk:Coat of arms of Ontario

message: what did it used to look like? that picture is the modern interpretation.
:Take a look at .  It really doesn't look all that much different. Snickerdo 05:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm upgrading the article to Start class according to Template:Grading_scheme.  For all I know, it may be valid for the C class, but that's based on the field of *possible* information for each particular project. I don't know how much there is to be known about this subject, but we have the basic history and maybe that's all there is to it.  I'm just a passerby who doesn't know anything about this particular subject.
Smuckola (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Start class

message: It says here, that "[t]his arms of Canada was shared with the provinces of Quebec, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador", but in the article on the coat of arms of Quebec it says the arms of Quebec was granted on the same day. So the arms of Ontario could not have been the arms of all of the then Canada, could it? Snowsuit Wearer (talk|contribs) 18:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Arms of Canada"
Talk:Morwell

message: Seems the original text for this article has been taken from here - 
. Did the original author have permission to copy that text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grover9 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 19 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it just me, or does someone else think Mid Valley are trying to advertise on here?
Yes, one comes from a IP and another's been coming from a username, but the fact I removed one paragraph and another was readded soon after (within 36 hours) seems odd. Furthermore, there's been no section added to Traralgon's article on Internet Providers, and BigPond wasn't mentioned in the now removed section here. Thoughts? -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 00:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mid Valley 

message: "The 1980s and 1990s were a growth period for the township of Morwell. Schools were built to educate the children of families settling in the area."
(Is it the 1880s or 1980s? I recall the town going into decline after the SECV was privatised.)
203.217.93.233 (talk) 11:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query re Sentence 

message: Morwell was a city for part of its history. It's not now. Does it make sense to change all reference to it being a city to it being a town? HiLo48 (talk) 01:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a city, now
Talk:Jardin des plantes

message: This came out in Mental Floss and might be a good addition about the history of the place.
"Pasha Mehmed Ali, the Ottoman Viceroy of Egypt, was eager to develop a working relationship with King Charles X of France in 1824. He decided that an exotic animal might be the perfect gift, so a giraffe calf was painstakingly transferred via a series of boats to Marseilles. From Marseilles, she walked to Paris, wearing a coat and specially-made boots to protect her from the elements. (A coterie of keepers walked beside her, every step of the 550-mile trek.) When the entourage arrived in Paris, citizens lined the streets, as they had never seen such a creature before. The king was suitably impressed with his gift and ordered a special home, the Jardin des Plantes, to be built for her."  -Mental Floss Karen (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Several sources confirm that although the government decree establishing the garden was issued in Jan 1626, land wasn't acquired and hence planting begun until 1635 (see e.g. Hyams & MacQuitty, 1969, p.82; reference at Botanical garden: References). The French language official web site says "la création fut décidée en 1626", i.e. the creation was decided in 1626.  I've edited the page to reflect this.  Peter coxhead (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Domangart Réti

message: Domangart I of Dalriada, was the son of Fergus Mor Mac the Great.  His grandfather was the King of Dalriada called Earc.  The story goes that a famine had stricken the nation so  several son's of Earc took off to find a better life and the ended up in western Scotland the part called Argyll where Fergus became the ruler of the Scots/Irish.  Domangart may have not been a king but his son Gabran was.  Fergus brought the stone of destiny with him on the trek to Scotland and they started a new life there where he united both countries into One.   -Mary Beth Armentrout-204.42.16.157 18:32, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First of all, I have included the MacNeill article for those unfamiliar with the business of Irish tribal names. Whether this is in the article in which to discuss the mention of the Corcu Réti is another matter. The alternative use Dál/Corcu is not surprising, nor is the reoccurence of the form Réti terribly significant. Apparently Fraser makes a big deal out of it and now thinks of the Dál Riata as the inconvenient Corcu Réti and thinks he's really found something special. He hasn't, and probably hasn't read MacNeill. Dál and Corcu are interchangeable. DinDraithou (talk) 00:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corcu Réti 

message: Where is no record of a Domangart Reti. The annals record a Domangairt mac Nissi [poss. of Reti], never Domangart Reti:
U507.1 Bellum Arda Corann & mors Lugdach filii Loegaire, & ut alii dicunt Domhangart Mc. (Nisse) Reti secessit anno .xxxu.
T506.2 Bass Domanguirt maic Nissi righ Alban.
CS464 Kal. ii. Domangart Mac Nisi quievit.
U466.2 Domangart m. Nisi quieuit.
AClon509. — Brwidy m'Milcon K. of Pictland, & Dawangort m'Nissie, K. of Scotland, Dyed-foede hiec erratum est.
147.1.235.114 (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titled incorrectly: should be Domangart mac Nissi
Talk:Electric instrument

message: I started this page because I have always felt this is how we need to understand music in the age of electronics.
: Careful, there. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Rob Kennedy 22:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

message: An electric reed organ (no article yet) is certainly electric, yet it contains no loudspeaker:  Its electric motor-driven fan moves air; tones are generated by free reeds.   Also, this article really should be Electric musical instrument, since there are plenty of electric instruments (look in an airplane cockpit or hospital operating room for examples) that are not musical.--Theodore Kloba 18:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think so to - "Electric instrument" should redirect to "Electric musical instrument" and not the other way around like it's now - is there anybody who dares to change that? --SwA (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: [Electrostatic reed organs (1934–1964)] now seems to exist as a section. FrankSier (talk) 01:31, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counterexample 

message: "utilization of an electronic instrument amplifier to project the intended sound as determined by electronic signals from the mechanical instrument".
All tonewheel organs (representativtly the hammond organ) should be classified as an electric instrument because they utilise the tonewheel to produce the sound (and later amplifies the signal).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.11.164 (talk) 03:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tonewheel organs 

message: I agree with an earlier writer that this article should be called Electric musical instrument. I think that this technically called a move rather than a rename. I think that "Electric instrument" should go to a disambiguation page. (I have started a new section so as not to discuss too many suggestions in a single section.) FrankSier (talk) 00:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of article(s)
Talk:Francisco Pizarro

message: There's a lot of information left out but I will only point out that whoever wrote "The natives began calling the Spanish the "Children of the Sun" due to their fair complexions and brilliant armor" didn't cite a single source for this claim. Unless he/she can provide evidence, the quote should be eliminated because it doesn't make any sense considering the location and time this allegedly took place in, the color of the Spanish armor, the smell and hygiene of the Spaniards, and the fact that it was actually the Spaniards who called themselves like that. Just because a particular group of Amerindians recieved them without hostility it doesn't mean that you can come up with an explanation as delusional as "fair complexions", specially when everyone else in the Andes saw them as a group of mercenaries. If you want to change history, why not make an effort and say it was because of their horses? S11MPL33 (talk) 01:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you very much! I've read this in other places that were unreliable sources such as student essays (with no cited reference) and most recently in a Wikipedia mirror site. In reliable sources I've found that the Incas referred to themselves (not to Pizarro and his men) as "children of the Sun" or "children of the Sun God". P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 14:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2021 

message: A large solar facility recently opened in Spain. It's not clear who it was named after, but the other Pizarros are South American. TGCP (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar power plant 

message: I find the "Legacy" section confusing. I know indigenous peoples regard Pizarro as an oppressor, and do not hold a positive view of him. Regardless, his status in Peru as described by Wikipedia is contradictory. The article states 
> "Pizarro is well known and celebrated in Peru as the leader of the Spanish conquest [...]"
Ok, so he is "celebrated".
> "After his invasion, Pizarro destroyed the Inca state and while ruling the area for almost a decade, initiated the decline of local cultures."
Wait, what? "Invasion" is not a positive term. "Destruction of the Inca state"... "decline of local cultures"? How is this a positive thing? Do Peruvians truly celebrate this?
> "much of the local population was reduced to serfdom[citation needed] under the Spanish elite."
Again, do Peruvians celebrate this?
> "Some Peruvians, particularly those of indigenous descent, may regard him negatively, although until relatively recently Pizarro had been portrayed positively, for instance in textbooks, for introducing Catholicism and creating a privileged class of mainly Spanish descent."
How is "creating a privileged class of mainly Spanish descent" something Peruvians would celebrate?
Again, is there clarification of actual Peruvians, both of indingenous and non-indingenous descent, about how Pizarro is held today? The article is *very confusing*! The andf (talk) 15:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reputation in Peru
Talk:Nutrigenomics

message: Could we add sections to address :
* Does nutrigenomics make any falsifiable predictions ?
* Is there any evidence of its success in treating diseases ? Rod57 (talk) 10:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  predictions and successes 

message: Moved from the article. They don't seem to be sources. Quick look at additions: one initially, mostly here, another here. --Ronz (talk) 02:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: List of articles

message: Given the state of the article, I've moved the external links here, hoping they might be used to find sources or other information for improving the article. --Ronz (talk) 02:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed external links
Talk:Wolfgang Flür

message: Every other page for Kraftwerk members (other than Fritz Hilpert and Henning Schmitz) has a picture of just them. Shouldn't Wolfgang have a picture of just him? --Pants 3000 15:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better picture 

message: Wolfgang will play in Milan in the Elita Festival on 14th April.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.238.19 (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIlan Elita Festival
Talk:The Decline of Western Civilization

message: The film is, along with Urgh! A Music War, famously unavailable on DVD (and VHS before it). I assume this is because of the difficulty of clearing the rights to all the songs, but the article doesn't mention it at all. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: good catch i noticed that as well,a shame (Rayroseimaging (talk) 04:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Shout! Factory has released all three movies on DVD as of 6/30/15. Spheeris is also at work on the fourth movie now (source: WTF/Marc Maron podcast). I'm not sure how to edit this into the entry.  https://www.shoutfactory.com/film/documentary/the-decline-of-western-civilization-collection Bpeschel (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Availability

message: I think we should add a reaction section to this. This documentary was significant and changed the way rock music was viewed. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactions
Talk:Christopher Caudwell

message: Finding Caudwell's birthdate would be nice.
Is he really a revolutionary? He never was in a revolution. In fact, he was fighting against the fascist revolution in Spain.
*Actually he was fighting for the Communist government of Spain.
No, there never was a "Communist government of Spain". Caudwell, who was a Communist, fought for the Republican coalition government of Spain, which included some Communists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.216.193 (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled