Talk:Oxford Street

message: The first sentence says there are 548 shops on Oxford Street and there is a reference cited. But, the referenced article says there are 300 shops!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.24.234 (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well spotted ;O) I have changed the article to say 300 now, in line with the reference given. Thanks. --bodnotbod (talk) 10:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: Let me know if you like these: --Salimfadhley 20:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some better photos ? 

message: Virtual Interactive Streetscapes not useful?
I would like to appeal yesterday's removal of the link Virtual Oxford Street from this page.  Up until yesterday the link had proved exceptionally useful to Wikipedia visitors for months and had taken them onto the world's only hi-res Virtual Interactive Streetscape to discover more about this road.  What better way to research a street than to walk along it thanks to Wikipedia from anywhere in the world!  (Boy I wish my Children's Britannica Encyclopedias had miles of virtual streetscapes when I was a kid!)
Would you be able to agree that Wikipedia users researching a city or street would find a virtual streetscape effictively allowing them to walk down that city's street useful?  Is that not within the spirit of Wikipedia?  This site is also recommended by the local Council's own short and carefully picked list of links.
If this is not agreed, then it raises the issue of contradicting the previous editors who felt this was within the spirit of the site, and which content from users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.182.97.140 (talk • contribs) 
:see WP:EL for firm policy on this matter. Kbthompson 14:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virtual Interactive Streetscapes not useful? 

message: Surely not relevant, by next week it will not merit a footnote. Street was closed, but I don't think the fire was in any way notable. Paulbrock 20:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Section removed,it's next week and it does not merit a footnote! Paulbrock 16:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed two external links concerning the fire, which I feel is reasonable considering it's been absent from the article itself for nearly three years. If anyone wants to make a case for putting them back in, feel free to do so. Grover Snodd (talk) 18:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire

message: Wiki is not a directory, only notable examples should be listed  - i.e. possibly Selfridge (for longevity), but lose the multiples. Say they're all represented, by all means, but let's not list them. Kbthompson 16:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shops 

message: What's the deal with New Oxford Street? It seems like a forlorn, pygmy copy of Oxford Street, in the shadow of Centre Point, with a couple of camera shops and not much else; is it relatively new? Was it an attempt at extending or competing with Oxford Street that failed, or is it just an anonymous length of concrete with no pretentions? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about the 7 year wait for a reply, but New Oxford Street is a mid 19th century bypass of the original Roman / Mediaeval road along St Giles High Street, to avoid marshy ground that was difficult for foot and horse traffic.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Oxford Street 

message: I see that the Christmas lights are on the main page as a DYK ... "that the Christmas lights on Oxford Street (pictured) have previously been switched on by Kylie Minogue, Bob Geldof, Terry Wogan, and Lenny Henry?"  This seems a good time to move back the page List of people who have turned on the Oxford Street Christmas lights which was the subject of an AFD.  I have made this list page into a redirect here but its history and contents may be useful. Andrew D. (talk) 12:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghost of Christmas Past

message: Hey - I just restored the edit that put an attached KML box on the bottom of the article. That part of it isn't very interesting to the general reader, for sure, but what it also does is replace the "coordinates" label in the top right corner with a couple of links allowing you to plot the route of the road on Bing Maps or Google Maps. That's something I hadn't seen before and it's pretty neat.  — Scott • talk 23:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It also removed a perfectly good map on the article itself that showed where Oxford Street was in London. What was the point of removing that? Other wikis show the route directly in the page, without needing to click to an external site. Also the link does not appear on the mobile app. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attached KML 

message: There's some contention about various IRA attacks on Oxford Street, mostly in the 1970s. So far, we have confirmed:
* Prudential - September 1973
* Selfridges - December 1974 + August 1975
* John Lewis - December 1992
All of these are confirmed to reliable sources such as the BBC and the University of Ulster archives. I will check The Times archive later as it may have further information. We need to make absolutely sure all the information is absolutely factually accurate, as writing about IRA attacks that didn't happen or claim to have caused injuries that did not exist could lead to trouble down the line. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IRA 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oxford Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719202723/http://legacy.london.gov.uk/assembly/transport/2010/mar02/item06a.pdf to http://legacy.london.gov.uk/assembly/transport/2010/mar02/item06a.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Consensus is Google Maps is okay as a source for showing where something is. You can't use it to prove notability, but their fact checking and peer review service is pretty good, from my experience. See Talk:Angel Recording Studios#Using Google Maps for a related discussion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Maps