lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spellingg Bee

message: The individual episode articles for Psych are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Psych episodes#Episode article review. Thanks. -- Jack Merridew 11:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of Psych episode article review 
Talk:First image on the Web

message: Front page mention... I predict troll-instilled defacements of the first image :( Maybe protect the image for a while? BACbKA 22:35, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I'd hit it. Sockatume, Talk 22:53, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Obligatory "hilarious" comment, got to get it out of the way.

message: yeah, I also wonder about the file size... I mean, 279kb??? I guess it is possible, photoshop was around then, and there were high speed connections... and so did jpeg... but hmmm indeed.
Jonbro 23:52, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think it is possible 

message: TBL's email address can be found here — with instructions how to write him properly :)
http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/#Before —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meisterlampe (talk • contribs) 08:29, 3 June 2006
:I dared, hoping that I was actually the first to do so. I'll report back once I get a reply. Whooo...I just mailed Tim Berners-Lee. I feel all giddy inside :P -- Ferkelparade π 20:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  who dares? 

message: Don't forget Wikipedia's policy on Original Research. --TrustTruth 20:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Strategic Air Command wings

message: Could I suggest that this article be stripped back to a list of the wings, with the detail on each wing being contained in a seperate article? This current article is overwealming yet only contains basic information on each wing. Creating a seperate page for each wing would encourage people to flesh out the details and facilitate wiki-links from other articles. --Nick Dowling 03:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: What I will do soon to reduce the size of the page is move the Strategic wings (MAJCOM wings) to the Strategic Wings page, unless there are better suggestions.
Buckshot06 22:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Size Issue

message: Buckshot,  I respect your knowledge and the fact that you're a SAC vet also, but what's the deal with reinserting the information that I remove when I add the information into their respective Bomb Wing pages?  (specifically the 2d, 5th, 7th, 456th, 509th Bomb Wings) I understand that you've got a vested interest in this page (you created it, you've got multiple books on the subject, etc.), but I'm trying to do the right "Wikification" thing by taking the information on the unit pages.
If I'm doing something wrong, please let me know.  If I'm doing something that insults you personally, let me know.  Like I already said, I'm just trying to separate the bomb wing pages into their respective wings and keep the respect that they demand.  Please let me know why you are continuing to reverse these changes that I am making.  Thanks.  NDCompuGeek 22:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  reversion or reinsertion of deleted wings 

message: I am in the process of trying to shorten the page and, in doing so, give each wing a separate page.  I started with the active bomb wings (I think I got them all), and am now moving on to the historical bomb wings, and will be (eventually) moving on to the rest of the wings in the Air Force.  This is, of course, dependent upon my real-life obligations (ie - if my wife broke the computer over my head yet....) and my ability to secure references and verifiable information.
Any questions, comments, etc., feel free to leave messages here (I've got this page watched, so I can keep an eye on it....).  Thanks!  NDCompuGeek 09:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the same article as USAF Historical Research Agency defines Wings by the same author.  What gives? -Taco325i 20:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dealt with now. Buckshot06 05:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  moving wings
Talk:Ronan Bennett

message: I've added a couple of references, but there are more needed. I realise that my references only cover some of the claims - i.e. the Guardian one mentions his degree, but not that it was first class. Given WP:BLP, it needs more work. Autarch (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This is not on the Lower Falls Road. It's on the Glen Road which connects to the upper Falls Road. Around one mile away from Upper Falls - and a further mile / two miles away from lower falls  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.252.202 (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Mary's CBGS
Talk:26th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: Does this infobox need to be located on this page?  It looks like it should be relocated to the WW2 section or removed completely.Mikeofv (talk) 03:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Infantry Division "The Big Red One" (1942–1945) Infobox
Talk:Mr. Manly

message: *KEEP 15,000 Google results for "Mr. Manly", so it's not a hoax.  And it sounds like a funny show. Pixelface may not have a user page but has a pattern of contributions that look like a "real" editor . betsythedevine 18:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments for or against a speedy delete

message: Lack of notability Widefox; talk 22:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Manly Manual]]
Talk:Löjtnant

message: Note. All alternations that do not include prior discussion and reasons for the change will be ignored!
Creator of the article: Malin Randstrom'''
:Please refer to Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. On the other hand, all contributions naturally need to conform to relevant Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Tomas e (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Swedish officerare are not NCOs, NCOs are enlisted personel given authority by a commissioned officer. As it is a factual error, I'll edit it anyway.
Doktor Musmatta (talk) 21:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commissioned Officer, once again... 

message: As a result of a reform (Ny Befals Ordning, eary 1980s), NCO, WO, CO were all made officers with the lowest rank set to Fanrik. Also, new officers no longer receive a officer’s commission (Officers fullmakt). That is, a Lojtnant is an officer without commission. In other words a non-commissioned officer (NCO). An active officer who was made an officer before 1980 is, indeed, a commissioned officer. However, there should be no one in service today. 
Therefore, we should use the more general term officer here. 
--Malin Randstrom (talk) 14:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply: Comissioned Officer 

message: Merge|Lieutenant|date=August 2008
Lojtnant does not correspond to Lieutenant and hence requires a separate page to explain why. 
This is a detal page of all the references to Löjtnant (Sweden) and thus should not be deleted or merged. 
--Malin Randstrom (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply: Merge 

message: The layout of the article is confusing. Also, the lead doesn't make it clear that this is a Swedish rank. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 06:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring needed
Talk:Kapten

message: Note. All alternations that do not include prior discussion and reasons for the change will be ignored!
Creator of the article: Malin Randstrom
:Please refer to Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. On the other hand, all contributions naturally need to conform to relevant Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Tomas e (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Swedish officerare are not NCOs, NCOs are enlisted personel.
Doktor Musmatta (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commissioned Officer 

message: Thank you for you note and your comment is indeed valid in the USA. However, a holder of this rank in Sweden is no longer comissioned as officer as an effect of the NBO reform 1982. Comission = Fullmakt.
Professional officers in Sweden are hired by the Armed Forces just in the same way as enlisted personnel in the USA. However, the way to become an CO = Comissioned Officer in the USA is to receive a comission from the president of the USA. I changed the line to "Kapten is a military rank". 
--Malin Randstrom (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reg. Comissioned officer 

message: Kapten does not correspond to Captain and hence requires a separate page to explain why. 
This is a detal page of all the references to Captain (Sweden) and thus should not be deleted or merged. 
--Malin Randstrom (talk) 12:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply Merge 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Överstelöjtnant

message: == All alternation to the page without prior discussion and comments will be ignored==
Malin
:Please refer to Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. On the other hand, all contributions naturally need to conform to relevant Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Tomas e (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thank you for your ideas regarding my articles on Swedish ranks.
The purpose of those pages is to explain each rank in detail about what they currently represent as well as providing a historical dimension. Also, I am striving to facilitate the browsing between ranks. A merge with another large article would make that article huge (considering that it may contain all ranks in the world) with too much detailed information. Also, the browsing functionality will get lost.  A better way is to put short notes with references into my articles. Other reasons are of more administrative nature: Having references make articles independent, which makes it possible to relink to other ranks as translation changes. For example, with the introduction of a new ranking system, ranks will be redefined. Changing references then would be much easier than rewriting huge articles. Also consider the situation where one rank corresponds to several Swedish ranks or vice versa. I am removing your merge requests by now! OK?
--Malin Randstrom (talk) 08:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding merge request by [[User:Tomas e]]
Talk:National Union of Students-Union of Students in Ireland

message: REVERTS
I've reverted a number of changes made by the last editor 81.108.15.24
The editor has changed Northern Ireland to the North of Ireland, I don't want to get into the whole constitutional debate here, let's leave it the way it was.
The editor changed NUS to NUSUK.  The offical name of the organisation is the "National Union of Students," which abbreviates to NUS.  If the editor doesn't like the name of the organisation then he/she should really complain directly to NUS.  Until NUS decides to re-name itself, wikipedia would be better using offical names and abbreviations derived thereof.
To the best of my knowledge Stranmillis joined NUS-USI a few years ago while Ben Archibald was convenor, so unless anyone knows differently I've changed the statement to the contrary.
I agree with the editor that the sentence explaining the reasons for the formation of NUS-USI is unsatisfactory, and I'm going to look at rephrasing it, I think the editors use of the term "the six counties" is unnessicary.
Quarkstorm 18:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cutback (roller coaster)

message: Technically, photos of this coaster are now eligible for fair use claim because it doesn't exist anymore - but it still would be better for us to ask around for some PD or CC images. I've emailed one person about his photos but he hasn't responded yet. ALTON .ıl 21:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drachen Fire
Talk:Hoot N Holler

message: This article has been nomiated for deletion, and I oppose that idea. Certainly it is not a major article, and certainly will never rise above stub level, but there is little reason to delete it based upon how much work has been done by members of the Roller Coaster Project on tracking every roller coaster possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zotdragon (talk • contribs) 00:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note -- I moved this comment to the AFD discussion Page.  Please place all AFD-related comments on that page so that it gets considered in the consensus gathering -- thanks.  --Rehcsif 03:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ciudad Mitad del Mundo

message: I've read that the true Equatorial line actually passes through the nearby Museo Solar Intiñán, which is a few hundred meters north of the Mitad del Mundo monument. True? Demf 18:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never heard that, but it wouldn't surprise me.  The ometers too far south.  Martin Slater (Quito, Ecuador).  This may be due to the fact that the datum used (PSAD56) to locate the equator is outdated and incorrect.
The exact location of the equator is somewhat arbitrary, since it depends on a geodetic datum (there is no perfect datum), and in addition the geographic poles of the Earth move very slightly (see Chandler Wobble) so latitude itself is slightly variable. Claims that the Mitad del Mundo monument was built in the "wrong place" are fundamentally mis-guided. Similarly, if you visit the old Royal Observatory at Greenwich in England, you would find that a GPS receiver does not display exactly zero degrees longitude on the line where tourists have their photos taken. This is not an error; it is due to the change in datum which has become standardized by the use of GPS technology and its inclusion in mapping products like Google Earth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.110.88 (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: True 0.0.0 N/S?

message: I already did the lacking articles and the desmbiguation page. Now, I am going to translate it all to english. Gatoparlante (talk) 07:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating from Spanish 
Talk:Video processing expansion card

message: Moving this material to discussion. It needs sourcing.
"allows the connection of a digital or analog source of video to a computer for the purpose of importing video into the computer for 
storage and/or editing."
Ste4k 18:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  thesis section 

message: * This book can be sourced for DAC material if necessary:  
* This site has leads for material in thesis: http://www.aboutvideoediting.com/ 
* This article is another for leads: http://computer.howstuffworks.com/video-editing.htm
...Ste4k 18:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  source leads 

message: Does anyone know the first capture card available to the public and when it was made available?
--Paul Keith 17:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Is a Video Capture Card the same as a TV Tuner?  Because we already have a page for that, and it has nice pictures and everything. --Sean Gray 11:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Tuner
Talk:Naval Air Station Brunswick

message: BRAC
----
"...Base Realignment and Closure committee found that there would be economic benefits in closing the base and removing all forces."  Economic benefits for whom?  Should there be an alternate POV on this subject, or reactions from the surrounding community? - TJLink 00:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hanmer, Wrexham

message: OK, I noticed that my home village didn't have an entry, so I started it off.  Currently there isn't much in it but I will do some research and take some photographs. Anyone else who wishes to contribute are welcome to do so.Barfbagger 18:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Is it really a notable, important building? It looks like a link to a commercial website. I suggest it should be removed. Apau98 (talk) 21:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hanmer Arms
Talk:Care2

message: Article could use some NPOV cleanup. --Alan Au 18:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: List of social networking websites is currently an AfD candidate.  You are invited to partake in this discussion. Czj 18:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of social networking websites on AfD 

message: List of social networking websites is currently a candidate for deletion. You are invited to partake in the discussion.--Crossmr 14:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of social networking websites on AfD

message: Gimme a break!
I've been using Care2 every day since 2001 - whereas Wikipedia, for example, started to look somewhat worthy of my serious attention only in the past two years or so.
Why am I offering my own experience as an example?
Because my experience is certainly no less legitimate and worthy of attention than the very limited personal experience of those who in all these years apparently haven't heard about Care2. (Or why would anyone call in question its "notability"?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.52.10 (talk) 20:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notability" in question?
Talk:James Kelly

message: Shouldn't this be "James Kelly (disambiguation)"? Harfarhs (talk) 17:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: since there is no person who is considered the primary topic, the convention is to put the disambiguation page at James Kelly and have James Kelly (disambiguation) redirect to it (as it does). Leschnei (talk) 12:12, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:The One with George Stephanopoulos

message: Does anybody know if Stephanopoulos has ever commented on the episode?
Musungu jim 18:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: why is this a stub? i think the tag should be removed. Canislupusarctos 10:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's a short article whose only ref is IMDb. Jim Michael (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: The individual episode articles for Friends (season one) are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Friends episodes#Episode article review (Season 1). Thanks. -- Jack Merridew 11:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of episode article review
Talk:Korpral

message: All alternation to the page without prior discussion and comments will be ignored
Malin
:Please refer to Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. On the other hand, all contributions naturally need to conform to relevant Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Tomas e (talk) 17:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do believe that promotion to korpral is after something like 120-150 days of service. My own promotion to korpral was after roughly four months of service, this june. I'll edit the "5-7 months" sometime soon, okay?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doktor Musmatta (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service time 

message: During my trainging at KBS Skytte/Idrott, I19/P5 1985, we were made Korpral after 5 1/2 months December, Furir after 8 months February, Sergeant after 12 months June and Fanrik after 15 months Sept.--Malin Tokyo (talk) 11:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply 

message: Added why this rank does not translates to lance corporal as stated officially by the Swedish Army.
--Malin Lindquist (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank translation 

message: As currently shown on the recruitment site for the Swedish Armed Forces, a rifle squadleader serving in Afghanistan will have an OR-4 rank, a deputy squadleader OR-3.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.241.212.232 (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Template talk:OCCSB schools

message: Shouldn't this be using  instead?  --Stephane Charette 18:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Converted. --Usgnus 19:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: Should we follow the pattern that already exists when we name the schools? They all end in "(Ottawa)".
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vvuser (talk • contribs) .
:They end in (Ottawa) because they are disambiguated. See WP:EiC. --Usgnus 16:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming articles
Talk:HSR Layout

message: Can someone improve this article ASAP? Read it as if you have no idea what the topic is, and tell me if you can understand what in the word it is talking about. Aparently "HSR Layout" is the name of a highway in Bangalore, but you wouldn't know that by reading this article. The basic definition of the term is not given. (and "Landmarks are" isn't gramatical). Please, the recent changes have been an improvement, but someone (like myself) who has no idea what this is, isn't going to learn anything by reading this article.--Andrew c 18:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been to Bangalore only once and as far as I can tell, HSR Layout is a region surrounding the Hosur Road. I haven't written that as I am not very sure about it. I will contact some Bangalore based editors to see if they can improve the article. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sarjapur road and Outer ring road are two different roads. Yogesh Sawant 10:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The name is correct -- the layout is named after two roads: Hosur Road and Sarjapur Road as it lies around the intersection of these roads. That's why it is called Hosur Sarjapur Road Layout. It is a locality, not a road.. 61.12.19.99 (talk) 08:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)