lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Windows Media

message: *No mention of Windows Media SDK?
:*did we forget to use our signature?--Dagibit 03:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: *I was told that at-least wma was dead since its release because occasional files would download viruses instead of licence information. I my self have infected my computer from running wma files. Why is this not mentioned here?--Dagibit 03:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Perhaps because this is an article on Windows Media and not the actual file format?  Unless you meant windows media when you typed "wma".  If you want to whine about the wma format, do it on that article's talk page.--Younmm23 23:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vulnerability

message: I have deleted WMF from the list of formas because:
*It was neither wikilinked nor sourced.
*.WMF is the extension of Windows Metafile, a vector image type that can be opened by Windows XP and Adobe Illustrator as an image. Wikipedia Commons contains a number of such images.
*Microsoft website does not confirm WMF as a specific media format. As a matter of fact it confirms Windows Metafile.
*Wikipedia website does not confirm WMF as a specific media format. Windows Media Format redirects back this very same article! 
Fleet Command (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WMF? Is this a joke?
Talk:Andy Stanley

message: A sampling of media coverage:
*
*
*
*
*
*
**Stanley one of 2 evangelical ministers participating in "an interfaith National Prayer Service ... held in the National Cathedral to cap the [Obama] inauguration, featuring Roman Catholic, Jewish, Muslim and Hindu clergy, along with pastors from mainline Protestant, evangelical and Orthodox Christian traditions."
*
* 
*
* 
*
*
*
**Stanley started and currently leads North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, Georgia. With 24,000+ members, it ranked as the second largest church in the United States in 2010.
There are many more articles out there; this is just a sample.
I have omitted the numerous references to his parents' very public marital problems into which he was dragged. The Rev. Charles Stanley, his father, served two terms as the President of the 16 million-member Southern Baptist Convention. Andy Stanley was an adult when this happened and made public statements on the issue; any material added to the article on that topic should be handled carefully with an eye to relevance and our Biographies of Living People Policy.
--A. B. (talk •  contribs)  20:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I just removed some recent additions (I missed them a few weeks ago), which are rather esoteric and primarily blog-sourced.  Al Mohler's blog entry and Tim Challies' article are both self-published sources and not allowed in Biographies of Living Persons.  Neither of these "controversies" (to use the term very loosely) is descriptive of Stanley's "beliefs" (a section created to house these), and thus also have issues with undue weight, along with notability.--Lyonscc (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, though, there are no verifiable sources with statements from Stanley affirming homosexuality as being congruent with Christian belief.  The article in question is about Stanley using an illustration with a divorced gay man in it in which he (Stanley) focused on the divorce/adultery involved.  The "controversy" (if one existed) was based on a non-statement (the perceived failure of Stanley to attack homosexual practice when it would have been easy to do so), and its inclusion in Wikipedia, at this point, would be Original Research, in which readers would be required to infer, from silence, that Stanley affirms homosexuality.  Unless you've got a positive affirmation of homosexuality in a verifiable source, this really isn't notable, and attributing it to him as a belief in a new section about "beliefs" is just hearsay.  With Biographies of Living Persons, there is a high bar for inclusion of controversial material, and a single opinion piece from a secondary source, critical of a non-statement doesn't really fit that bill.--Lyonscc (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality and The Shack
Talk:Speed Buggy

message: As one can find from the article I linked, there are multiple Boomerang cable channels in different countries. Is the US version meant? I don't get the channel and don't know. Also, the previous writer did not say.
:Right now, the US Boomerang channel (DirecTV 298) shows Speed Buggy as part of their "Those Meddling Kids"   afternoon block. NBK1122 (talk) 11:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  which Boomerang? 

message: Does any one have information on the live action version of this with a horn?12.145.73.51 12:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live Action 

message: Did Speed Buggy had a Laugh Track?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.47.140.30 (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laugh Track
Talk:U.S. Route 9 in New Jersey

message: Where Route 9 and Route 18 cross is that Marlboro or Old Bridge?
Nextbarker 02:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Old Bridge, it's just across the Monmouth-Middlesex county line.  Just to warn you, the other junctions you added are going to be removed.  I'm not going to do it yet, though, because the whole list needs work since I wrote it when US 1 and 9 were the same article. -- NORTH talk 04:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Route and Route 18 

message: I added Business Route 33 because it tends to get more busier with the Racetrack and the Mall there, and there was once a circle by that point, and it Route 33 Business and US 9 gets more jammed up here, then at NJ 33 mainline for those reasons.
Nextbarkernextbarker
And another reason, NJ 33 mainline has no direct access to US Route 9 North, on the eastbound side, you have to take NJ 33 Business and Westbound you need Route 537, unless you take the southbound 9 exit and make a jughandle at Schanck Road.
Nextbarker 05:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I'm getting through to you.  The completeness of an interchange doesn't really matter, and a freeway junction will win over a traffic light every time.  A mainline route wins over a bannered route every time.  -- NORTH talk 06:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business Route 33 

message: Sorry for the confusion, North, that's what those reason are for adding Business NJ 33, there's no mall entrance on the Route33 mainline is there?
Nextbarker 02:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The former circle doesn't matter.  Circles (present or former) do not make major junctions.  The mall entrance does make a valid point, and because of that the business route might be included on a shorter list, but since we must choose our junctions to meet the guideline (which we're already breaking), the freeway junction at the non-bannered route wins hands-down. -- NORTH talk 02:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  apologizing 

message: The article currently has 12 junctions listed in the infobox road template, but there is supposed to be a maximum of 10.  I'd remove some myself, but I don't know what are the more major junctions...  --LJ (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: A discussion about whether junctions for US 1-9 should be put in the articles about US 1 and US 9 in New Jersey are being discussed here. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on US 1-9 

message: Does any portion of Route 9 cross the Great Egg Harbor Bridge? From what I've read, New Jersey's straight line diagram has the route crossing the Beesley's Point Bridge, but that bridge hasn't existed for going on two years. Does anyone know about this? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The SLD probably hasn't taken into account that the Beesley's Point Bridge no longer exists as it was last updated in 2013. But for all intents and purposes US 9 uses the Great Egg Harbor Bridge to cross the bay. Dough4872 00:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Great Egg Harbor Bridge]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tobias Conradi

message: :: I have started a discussion about this on Tobias' talk page.  If they are not sock puppets, they are at least technically meatpuppets.  Tobias has said they are friends from off the project who came to his support while he was blocked.  The issue is are they indeed friends, and thus separate people, or are they Tobias himself in different guises.  If the former, then they should be unblocked at this point, and the sockpuppet warnings removed.  If the latter, then my support of Tobias in the recent situation will turn out to be misplaced. - TexasAndroid 19:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: is everybody who is my friend a "technical meat puppet"? I assume no. Consider stopping to call them meat puppets. They are human beings who can decide for themselves what they do. Here in tango there are a lot of proud people, that would absolutly not like to act as a puppet of anybody else. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also, Tobias would like his name cleared of the accusations of Sockpuppetry.  Yeah, he used IPs to dodge and protest his block, but he ended up serving a bit over a week for that whole thing.  And a label around here of being a sockpuppeteer is not a nice label to have hanging over oneself. - TexasAndroid 20:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The facts are that Tobias used IP socks and these two users acted as meatpuppets.  There is no name to clear here, I have stated before I thought the registered users were meatpuppets. That doesn't affect the outcome of his previous block. Hauke wrote to me privateley saying he had a dymanic IP and would just edit under a different name, so If these users would like to be unblocked, they can request to do so themselves, however I have seen no indication of that from the users, only continual rants by Tobias claiming they were wronged. pschemp | talk 20:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Tobias, every time I say something you blow it out of proportion and make a grand big issue and add more grandiose accusations. Since it is obvious you can't discuss things in a calm logical manner without twisting facts and latching onto insane technicalities, I am done conversing with you. Find someone else to help you, I tried many times to communicate but you can't seem to let anything go.  I am invoking WP:IAR as defense of all my actions that you seem to think are out of line. Argue all you want to other people, but you have exhausted my patience and I refuse to deal with you any more. Any issue you have with me you can take to RfC or Arbcom. pschemp | talk 00:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not that everytime you say something I blow it out of proportion. I only  point to wrong allegations, and possible policy violations. Who did perform the checkuser you mentioned? I allways can take issues to RfC and ArbCom, but I prefer to resolve as much as I can without these processes. I do my best to discuss things in a calm logical manner, you may point me to any unlogical stuff I write. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 01:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cooley LLP

message: Who cares? Should we start creating articles for every single law firm on the planet? Snorgenhorpher 22:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cooley Godward]]

message: There sure are a lot of weasel words and peacock feathers in the article. It looks like just two IPs are responsible for nearly all of the lavish praise. I'm going to remove some of the more egregious examples. Mattymatt 19:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-neutral Tone

message: For posterity's sake, we should document here on the Talk page how Cooley LLP hypocritically issued a cease and desist letter to a company, while performing the same wrongs as the company it was chastising. - 173.161.202.37 (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  For shame 

message: One of several founding partners of Axios (website).  Should be mentioned.--Wikipietime (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch partner of [[Axios (website)]] 
Talk:Brooklyn Park, Minnesota

message: For those who plan on editing and expanding this article, please follow the Template for a U.S. City. Thanks!--Daveswagon 09:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template for a U.S. City
Talk:Robert Curbeam

message: I had the pleasure of meeting this gentleman between STS-85 & STS-98, courtesy of my brother and a trainer that used to work at NASA. My brother and I were already planning a visit to JSC with the trainer, but unbeknownst to me, my brother had more planned. The trainer, my brother and I were having lunch with a bunch of people. In walks Robert Curbeam and sits down at the table with us to chat. He seemed like a nice guy and all.  Problem was, at the time, I didn't know who he was! I thought he was a trainer too. Once he left, my brother asked how I enjoyed meeting an astronaut. I just about had a coronary! A dream come true. Why do I write this little story here -- to let everyone know what a nice person, and pardon this ... how down to earth, Robert is for spending time with a space fanatic like me. Such NPOV statements don't belong on the article page, but Robert deserves some accolades. --N35w101 22:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Met this man

message: I found an error in the calculations for the time Mr Curbeam spent in space. He has loged 37 days 14 hours 33 minutes and 23 seconds in 3 shuttle flights. I have corrected the error on the article page.--74.220.175.126 (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Math error

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Sts-116-patch.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:STS-116 emblem.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Sts-116-patch.png]]
Talk:Osbert Molyneux, 6th Earl of Sefton

message: Does anyone know how their daughter, Lady Evelyn Molyneux, died? She died at age 14 and there is no story or explanation anywhere. Help would be greatly appreciated.
A number of years ago, I worked for a while with the archives at Croxteth Hall, the home of the Molynueux family in Liverpool.  From my understanding, there was a theory that Lady Evelyn could have suffered from epilepsy?   
Lady Sefton's diaries from that time make references to her daughter having an 'illness' although it was never given a name on paper.  Epilepsey was considered a shameful thing and aristocratic families, keen to present their bloodline as being untainted usually did all they could to hide the truth from society.  Keeping the affected child at home with a goveness was one way of dealing with such a situation.  
Hope this is helpful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Verity123 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of daughter's death
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-10/In the news

message: Good job on keeping the the Signpost's coverage of the Campaign wiki on Wikia related to press coverage. I think its a neat idea and wish Jimmy and Angela the best, but I have no interest in using the 'pedia to help out the for-profit enterprise. Bravo for keeping the story npov.  youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 22:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Wikia story

message: I don't think commercial spamming is allowed on Wikipedia. - Xed 08:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you could be more specific about what your point is. The Wikipedia Signpost reports news, including news that happens to involve commercial enterprises. We've been doing that for a long time. If you're concerned about commercial endeavors, I would think you'd encourage more reporting about them, not less, as the best way to deal with whatever negative influences you believe they have. I don't see what that would have to do with spamming at all. --Michael Snow 16:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Also it should be pointed out that the signpost is not held within the encyclopedia namespace (the background is blue, like user pages, rather than white like article pages).  So the signpost, as well as any commentary or opinion held by it, is not held inside the encyclopeic boundaries (just the same as what is on someone’s userpage may not be encyclopedic but is allowed). SFC9394 16:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I found the story to be an open and honest report on a news item of interest to the Wikipedia community, not an attempt to help Jimbo raise the money to buy a new boat or car.  youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 16:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Wikipedia publiciszing a commercial enterprise? 

message: Campaigns is really a good idea. Now, editors interested in developing wikipedia as a truly global encyclopedia, the Best, shall work here, and for wiki-ing about their political "thoughts" and "insight" shall go there. --Bhadani 15:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It is good
Talk:Dalek language

message: This article does not represent original research as I've encountered the material in some early Dr. Who material.  It may be stolen from copyrighted material, however, and it certainly isn't noteworthy enough to belong in Wikipedia, so I support deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suttkus (talk • contribs) 
I think the article could perhaps be expanded sufficiently to be worth keeping, I added some stuff by example. Merging wouldn't be a good idea considering how large Dalek is already. Bryan 00:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it's all gibberish. The Dalek language has never been touched on in the television series, and what little bits and pieces there are in the spin-off media are not consistent and certainly not on the order of an entire artificial language, nor are those fragmentary references particularly notable except for what has already been mentioned in the Dalek article. What this article is is basically a copy of a glossary from a single Dalek annual produced for children in 1964 which has never been used outside it in any significant form. Remove that, and everything else of note is already in the main Dalek article. This should be AFD'd. --01:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Twelve-dish Christmas Eve supper

message: Are you sure the "twelve" represents the months of the years? I thought it was the Twelve Apostles. Dr. Dan 23:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my grandma, it's months. Remember, Lithuanians are the last pagans... so months are much more close to them than some apostels. That's my theory, anyway. Renata 00:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

message: For discussion of merge with Wigilia, see Talk:Wigilia. --Off-shell (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Template talk:Bowl game navbox

message: I believe this general Bowl Game template should be just a list of the names of the bowl games with no dates. This template should be placed on the general bowl game articles like Outback Bowl or Gator Bowl. We then should create a  template for use on articles like 2006 Alamo Bowl or 2007 Fiesta Bowl. Actually, I could even argue that the individual yearly bowl games do not need a template. But I still think this template should not contain dates as it applies to  non temporal articles. Any other opinions?↔NMajdan•talk 22:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A general template would be better. If a yearly template is used it needs to be changed each year though, because right now articles like NCAA football bowl games, 2005-06 have a template at the bottom giving the dates of the 2006-07 bowl season, which would seem to be a problem. It will become even more of a problem when this is changed for this year's bowl games, as there are more articles like 2007 Rose Bowl which have the template (or actually should have it) and will at some point have the dates of the next year's bowl season. Any thoughts? Phydend 17:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I changed it, created  and also . If anyone sees anything wrong with any of them please fix. I think all of the current bowls are on this one, defunct ones could probably go here too, but that's for further discussion I'd say. Phydend 04:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General template
Talk:Armed Forces Bowl

message: The bowl will become the alltel Wireless Bowl starting in 2006. NoseNuggets 7:10 PM US EDT July 10 2006
*Nope, the deal fell through  Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't the payout to each team that participates in this bowl $750,000? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tysqui (talk • contribs) 04:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bowl Payout 

message: You can use photos from the AFB here, http://www.flickr.com/photos/adamrstone/sets/72157603592423158/
General125 (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFB Photos 

message: If this game doesn't always include a service academy, then what's the significance of this bowl game, and why is it called the Armed Forces Bowl? I used to think the purpose of this bowl game was to showcase the best service academy against a comparable non-service college, and in most years there's a service academy playing, but the history table shows that's not always true. I think other readers are likely to wonder the same thing, so would someone please add an explanation of the name and purpose of this bowl game? RCTodd (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and purpose
Talk:Suture (joint)

message: These phrases absolutely do need to be redirected to this article: 
skull suture, sutures of the skull, suture of the skull, and  cranial suture. The writers of articles should not have to hee-haw around to figure out what these are called in the Wikipedia: suture (joint). How about suture (cranial joint) and suture (skull joint) also ?98.67.110.56 (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects to this article are needed !