Talk:Logic in computer science

message: I can live with this article in its present form. But I can't find any policy that says that you can't link outside the main namespace. It does make sense that you wouldn't link to the Wikipedia or Help namespaces, because those aren't part of the reference. But Category? If I'm wrong, please point me to the policy I'm wrong about. ---Isaac R 18:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not exactly policy, but the reason for it is given in Wikipedia:Avoid self-references.  In this case you were linking to a category that was already on the page because it appears in the category in the usual way; thus the link was duplicate as well as breaking those syndicates of WP that do not use the categories namespace. --- Charles Stewart 18:54, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

message: In my opinion, the description of the kind of topics we have should be as concise as possible, so that it is useful as a definition of what logic in computer science.  As it stands, it does not serve this purpose.  I propose that we start a structured List of logic in computer science topics that covers all of the articles that we judge to fall under this heading, and then try to distill down the current list of topics, perhaps changing the name to list of areas. --- Charles Stewart 16:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Organisation of this article

message: This article is rather uneven in its coverage and seems rather too focused on AI. It fails to cover many other significant applications including almost everything related to computer programming, like type systems, formal verification (of programs), etc. Never mind finite model theory and its relation to computational complexity. 86.127.138.67 (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty amateurish 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Logic in computer science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130424071228/http://www.cs.umd.edu/~golbeck/LBSC690/SemanticWeb.html to http://www.cs.umd.edu/~golbeck/LBSC690/SemanticWeb.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Logic in computer science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025052601/http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/lics/ to http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/lics/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Production systems perform "conflict resolution" when more than one antecedent of a rule matches the current state of the working memory, and they destructively update the working memory by adding and retracting "data" expressed as "facts" in the database. Both of these features mean that production systems do not have a direct interpretation as systems of logic.  See for example: Logic_programming#Relationship_with_the_Computational-representational_understanding_of_mind. 
I suggest that the paragraph on if-then rules be deleted and be replaced by a paragraph on logic programming. Robert Kowalski (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a paragraph about logic programming. Hopefully, someone else will delete the paragraph about IF-THEN rules. Robert Kowalski (talk) 20:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  If-then rules in production systems are not a subset of FOL