lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hurricane Humberto (1995)

message: Looks pretty good for storm that didn't affect land. The storm history should be shortened a bit - it's too long as it is. The unisys reference should be changed to something more official. Hurricanehink (talk) 05:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The NOAA's 1995 page doesn't work either as a ref. You should use Hurdat for any records that were never explicitely stated. Hurricanehink (talk) 05:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: * Well-written - Pass - One problem, though. The storm history is a bit too long. Try cutting it down a bit. Six paragraphs isn't needed for a storm that lasted only a few days.
* Factually accurate - Pass , though see if there are any non-NOAA sources (unlikely but possible)
* Broad - Pass (gotta love the fish storm articles, nice and easy)
* Non-POV/Stable - Pass
* Images - Pass
Good job Crazy, GA passed. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: Humberto in 1995 wasn't that meteorologically extraordinary of a storm, it doesn't have any impact on land. --219.79.127.179 (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: you may discuss about it. --219.79.127.179 (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose for now, until the 1995 AHS article is complete. 1995 was a busy season, and storms from busy seasons need to be handled differently. I think this article is appropriate, and it was part of a parade of storms. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really want to add more content to 1995 AHS at this time, given moving content to the season article would increase its content size to 116kb. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Article is not needed. The only thing notable is that it formed in rapid succession with other storms, that could easily be mentioned elsewhere. Therefore I propose a merge. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Ángel Nieves Díaz

message: Isn't his correct name Angel Nieves Diaz and not the other way round? That is the only reference that I can find on websites of significance. WWGB 01:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. My bad about that. Someone should merge it with Ángel Nieves Díaz. Thief12 19:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Angel Diaz Nieves]] (incorrect name) talk

message: ==Three different drugs==
Why do they even bother to use three different drugs? A quart of penethol should be enough to kill anyone, and without pain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.39.222 (talk • contribs) 17 December 2006
:I moved this conversation to Talk:Lethal injection and replied there. --ZeroOne (talk | @) 18:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind.  I found his last meal, along with his final statement in this link. --Angeldeb82 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ángel Nieves Díaz]] talk

message: Why do they even bother to use three different drugs? A quart of penethol should be enough to kill anyone, and without pain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.39.222 (talk • contribs) 17 December 2006
:I moved this conversation to Talk:Lethal injection and replied there. --ZeroOne (talk | @) 18:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Three different drugs

message: I read on Journal Inquirer that Diaz's last meal was shredded turkey tacos, rice and beans, apple crisp and iced tea.  However, this article needs a source that proves he had that last meal.  Can you find it, please? --Angeldeb82 20:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind.  I found his last meal, along with his final statement in this link. --Angeldeb82 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Last meal

message: Change "until further notice" to "for seven months" or similar, since on the death penalty halt recently ended.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6905694.stm Jaimeastorga2000 07:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Penalty Posponement 

message: According to the article, "Nieves Díaz and two friends, Angel Toro and another yet-unidentified man, robbed the Velvet Swing Lounge, a strip club in Florida. During the robbery, Joseph Nagy, the manager, was shot to death."  If he was part of the robbery, and someone died in the course of robbery, then he was guilty of murder under the felony murder rule, and he was justly punished.
John Paul Parks (talk) 01:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Felony Murder
Talk:Rage (1972 film)

message: I am asounded that there have been no edits to this page since I first originated it. -- Jason Palpatine 05:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 
Talk:World Outgames

message: It would appear that the creator or subsequent editor/s holds a certain point of view that is anti the outgames.Asm1964 06:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is quite obvious if you read both this article and Gay Games that there is a NPOV issue. There is pertinent facts which are omitted here and the introduction (probably too long) focuses too much on the initial schism and includes content that should probably be put further down under separate headings... Enquire (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: If it is the author(s) intent not to confuse the reader, as stated in the first sentence of the third paragraph.  Why are both articles for the World Outgames and Gay Games written so similarly?  The trivia section, for example, states trivia for both organizations.  Both articles should be rewritten.  I would do so myself, but I am not familiar with the two organizations.IceBRG (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay Games Confusion
Talk:Boeing C-75

message: I've been trying to place in the lead the most important material from the body of the article. A brief statement about the fact that the fuselage carried huge stores of fuel making this transport unique seems relevant. Why delete it? Also, I doubt that any aircraft at the start of WW2 had modifications made to it just for comfort. Space in the forward fuselage had to be provided for the enlarged crew owing to the length of time required to cross the Atlantic. A brief mention of this in the lead seems wise. Edweirdo (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Read WP:LEAD. Leads are to be summaries of the article, not places for introducing new information in detail. A paragraph is not brief, but one sentence would probably suffice, though what is there now is much better that what was added before. Finally, when making claims, especially those that might contradict other parts of the text which haven't been modified, such claims need to be cited from reliable sources. Hope that helps. - BillCJ (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article lead.
Talk:Great White (album)

message: I propose that Stick It be merged into Great White. I think that the content in the Stick It article can easily be explained in the context of Great White, being different releases of the same album.  Lewismaster (talk) 11:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Mona von Bismarck

message: In 1926, Mona opened a New York dress shop with her friend Laura Merriam Curtis...
At the time, Laura was previously engaged to Harrison Williams, said to be the richest man in America...''
:Do you mean she was currently engaged to Harrison, or that she had previously been engaged to him? Valetude (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laura and Harrison Williams 

message: If her husband had the title 'Graf (Count) von Bismarck-Schönhausen', then she would have had the equivalent title, the German for 'countess'. Did she prefer not to use this? Valetude (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title?
Talk:IAR 80

message: This article reads well, however for most sections there are few or none citations to the extensive list of sources in "References". Please improve this. Thanks, DPdH (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations please 
Talk:Focke-Wulf Fw 44 Stieglitz

message: Hi Wikipedians, this article can be expanded using info from the similar one in other languages. At least adding sections "Operational history" and "Aircraft on display". And also adding more verifiable sources. Regards, DPdH (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion
Talk:Miles Magister

message: Is the number built 1,393 or 1,203? Drutt 11:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither, the actual total was 1,303 (a typo changed the "0" to a "9"). I have amended the passageto read: "Production of the Magister continued until 1941 by which time 1,203 had been built by Miles and an additional 100 were built under licence in Turkey." FWIWBzuk 13:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I just removed what looks to be a piece of unsourced folk etymology about the name "Miles Magister"; looks to me like it was added by someone unaware that "Miles" was the name of the manufacturer...  --Rlandmann (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The Irish Air Corps used twenty-seven, not fifteen Magisters. I don't know how many places I have seen this wrong figure mentioned.Sir smellybeard (talk) 16:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Air Corps 

message: An editor added an entry for France. I corrected the syntax, the reference was his own name. Is it true that France operated 101 of these? StarryGrandma (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Cant find any reference in either of the Peter Amos books (which are pretty much the last word on Miles aircraft histories). It lists Master IIs and Martinets in French service but no Magisters. MilborneOne (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll take it out. Thanks for checking. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly they were confusing the Miles' aircraft with the one made by Fouga (Potez) of the same name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.126.91 (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the French Air Force use these?
Talk:LWS-6 Żubr

message: I have tagged the paragraph in the article for requiring a citation, because I have a reliable source(as reliable as any source on pre-war Polish aircraft) that contradicts the paragraph. Without a good citaion this paragraph and the article title will have to be changed, or at least state that the info is uncertain and state both sources.Petebutt (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a reference from a Polish expert A. Morgała, who states, that wasn't used in any documents and appeared in the 1960s. Pibwl ←« 23:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: L.W.S.4
Talk:Handley Page HP.88

message: The aritcle currently gives a servo failure as the cause. Hygate, British experimental jet aircraft, Argus (1990) notes a divergent oscillation with at least 12g (the instrument maximum reading) recorded on the Black Box and, by implication, leaves this associated with the previously observed tendency to oscillate. The servo story appears at first sight to be inconsistent with this and needs either proper citation or deleting. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 23:17, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  cause of breakup
Talk:Rolls-Royce Thrust Measuring Rig

message: I'm not sure but I think this may be the same device that crashed during testing in preparation for the Apollo 11 mission:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/neil-armstrong-simulator-crash-apollo-11-astronaut_n_1695226.html
50.0.136.25 (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Similar but not the same device refer Lunar Landing Research Vehicle. MilborneOne (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  crash
Talk:Douglas DT

message: Numbers, Variants & Citations
Greetings, wanted to add to the article, since a few of the variants used rare, early engines that lacked Wiki Articles of their own
https://www.enginehistory.org/Piston/Wright/WrightR-1820.pdf
https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/wright-cyclone-p-1-radial-9-engine/nasm_A19710881000
the DT-6 using one of the few Wright (Lawrence) P-1s built it's basically a 9 cylinder R-1654 (Bore x Stroke:6.0 x 6.5 in.)
Wright T-2/ Typhoon (Used in DT-4, DT-5 & DTB)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_T-3_Tornado
https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/wright-tornado-t-3-v-12-engine/nasm_A19660461000
Also, the article numbers have trouble adding up.
The Intro has 46+ 20+ 6+ 11+ 7, from Douglas, L-W-F, NAF, D-W & Norway respectively, adding to the 90 listed in the InfoBox.
But the Variants List 3 DT-1 & 64 DT-2 with several refits, like 4 DT-4/-5 w/ Wright T-2/-2B & 1 w/ Wright P-1 Radial, which isn't close to 90
Though this:
http://www.aerofiles.com/_doug2.html
lists the variants WITH serial numbers, so it looks to be a more reliable source. though it doesn't say that the Peruvian DTB has a "Typhoon" (likely "T-3 Tornado") engine
Also, for legibility having the numbers built in the Intro text looks really sloppy:
 ″Douglas built 46 DT-1 and DT-2 torpedo bombers for the U.S. Navy, Norwegian Navy, and Peruvian Navy. 20 DT-2 aircraft were built under license by the L-W-F Engineering Company Inc., six by the Naval Aircraft Factory (NAF), and 11 by the Dayton-Wright Company. Another seven were built for Norway under license by Marinens Flyvebåtfabrik. ″
instead try:
Construction:
Douglas		46 (3 DT-1, 4 DTB, 1 DT-2B, 38 DT-2?)
L-W-F		20 (DT-2)
NAF			6 (4 DT-4, 2 becoming DT-5?)
D-W			11 (SDW/SDW-1A?)
Mariens		7 (DT-2C)
Flyvebåtfabrik (License)
Columns and Tabs are friendlier on the Eyes. It could even be a Table. Hope this helps!2603:7080:CB3F:5032:EC60:CC8D:F1B9:C59C (talk) 02:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Der Westwall

message: Don't know why the damn box is fucking up.
Sorry--Dudeman5685 06:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An RfC of possible interest to the editors of this article can be found here.
Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: An RfC of interest
Talk:Capezio

message: What does it mean to be a "supporter" of Capezios? --Dmz5 06:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Supporter?

message: I have tagged this article for deletion, because someone has completely re-written the article, and in the process has made it read as blatant advertising, thus I can only assume this has been done by someone linked to the company.  Either this article needs to be deleted and started again from scratch, or rolled-back to a point when it was more fitting with Wikipedia guidelines. Crazy-dancing (talk) 10:59, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taggin 

message: * The reference is to a dead link.
* There is absolutely no reason to restrict the list to "notable" people only.  If anything, red-links should be encouraged: these are people that probably really are notable, but nobody has bothered to create the appropriate articles. Choor monster (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capezio Award 

message: — Assignment last updated by RoccNRoll (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Cultures
Talk:Handley Page Manx

message: I edited the wordy parenthesis explaining the name Manx "(which appropriately shares the same name as a breed of vestigial-tailed cat)" down to "(named for the well-known breed of stub-tailed housecat)" based on the assumption that the plane was named after the ancient breed of cat.  I don't have the background to verify causality.  It's just possible that the tailless plane has some less obvious connection with the Isle of Man (designed, built, or tested there?) so I put a "verification needed" flag on my own words.  Would a Wikipedian with better access to UK aviation historical evidence please confirm or else shoot down the assumption? - Egmonster (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake 
Talk:Golconda, Nevada

message: How many inhabitants live in Golconda? Please mention the source !!!  --84.138.124.179 06:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0935314/ - the mentioned episode, but I didn't manage to find a citation for Golconda... - Ickle Ronnie (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal Minds (film)
Talk:Miles M.39B Libellula

message: Just an aside... These planes look like something Burt_Rutan would have come up with had he been a designer long ago.  A plane ahead of its time? Itsfullofstars 00:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

message: A civil transatlantic mail carrying version is mentioned in a newspaper article of 15.5.46 in All Services Daily Newspaper of South East Asia Command. 'The Post Office is considering plans for a trans-Atlantic airmail service in 500 mile-an-hour jet planes carrying nearly two tons of mail. Miles Aircraft Ltd., Reading, have submitted detailed schemes for a tandem wing Libellula air-craft [...] Mails would be compressed to fit into standard containers which would slide into a special compartment. Planes will be all-metal with a crew of two and powered with two or three jet engines of well-proved design. A wooden model of the Libellula on which the project is based has been flying for three years.' Robert P Connolly (talk) 10:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transatlantic mail carrier
Talk:Boulton Paul P.111

message: I've removed the comment  (also called BP.111), which was cn'd last May. Brew (Boulton & Paul Aicraft, Pitnam) does not say this, nor The Observers Book of Aircraft, nor The Jet Aircraft of the World (Green & Cross). All B&P projects were given a P (project) number according to Brew p.312, eg the P.82 Defiant. TSRL (talk) 13:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: BP.111
Template talk:Elizabeth II

message: I renamed this template before being reminded that Elizabeth II is Queen of other states/countries as well as the UK. I've posted a query here about this issue; apologies in advance if the current name proves to be inaccurate. Regards, David Kernow (talk) 06:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template name 

message: Why do I here miss the Sex Pistols' song? - It's the most famous depiction of Liz in popculture. --188.110.140.136 (talk) 02:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Depictions 

message: State Visits section in the table for Elizabeth II in Further Reading needs to be updated to reflect additional receptions of the Queen, e.g. the Donald Trump visit in 2019, etc.JacksonFolly (talk) 07:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't appear to be an article for that. DrKay (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2022
Talk:EWR VJ 101

message: It's pretty well documented that the VJ 101C was developed as the first flying example, by the consortium of Entwicklungsring Süd. This was a consortium between Heinkel, Messerschmitt and Bölkow, Heinkel having already produced a VJ 101A design and Messerschmitt a VJ 101B.  The VJ 101A, with rotating nacelles (i.e. whole engine), was conceptually close to the design as built.
There had also been a Heinkel 231 design before this (it had no hope of going supersonic, as was a key requirement for the VJ 101). This was based on four  fixed engines in the fuselage and vectoring exhaust nozzles.
Now, is there anything really solid to link the He231 design to Heinke's VJ 101A concept, and thus the VJ 101C?  (as is claimed here, presumably based on http://www.robertcmason.com/textdocs/GermanVSTOLFighters.pdf).  I see this as an error - Heinkel's VJ 101A concept was a clean sheet design. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: An article in flight https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1963/1963%20-%200775.html?search=VJ%20101 says it was a new design with a number of different combinations of lift and thrust engine looked at before they decided on the final configuration. No obvious connection with the He 231. MilborneOne (talk) 13:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessors?
Talk:VFW VAK 191B

message: Reads like an advertisement for Flight International. I don't see any reason to mention the name except for advertisement. 185.233.255.237 (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Necessary for the correct formatting of reference citations (WP:CITE). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight International
Talk:3I Sky Arrow

message: There is no mention of this aircraft inJanes encyclopedia of Aviation as clainmed in the reference section so I removed the referencePetebutt (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Life and Times of Hank Greenberg

message: ==Untitled==
"Greenberg (1998) is a documentary film directed and written by Aviva Kempner about one of the best players" the Major League Baseball has ever had One of the best? Maybe one of the most famous but best is clearly bias. Please change.VarunRajendran 17:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NNPOV?=

message: "Greenberg (1998) is a documentary film directed and written by Aviva Kempner about one of the best players" the Major League Baseball has ever had One of the best? Maybe one of the most famous but best is clearly bias. Please change.VarunRajendran 17:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charity Drive

message: This episode also features Michael and George Michael arrested together, on their way to see the likewise arrested George, Sr. — the same three that are eventually "released" at the end of the third season.
--JPX7 06:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reflexivity/Allusion
Talk:James Brown (footballer, born 1906)

message: This article ambiguously mentions Bradford F.C., this must be either Bradford Park Avenue A.F.C. or Bradford City A.F.C.. Does anyone know which club it is? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 12:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Bradford Park Avenue A.F.C.]] or [[Bradford City A.F.C.]]
Talk:Shiplift

message: I'm posting this on the talk pages of the related articles, in the hope of unifying them.
I've just discovered the very haphazard nature of articles relating to the various methods of (for want of a completely neutral discriptor) removing a boat or ship from the water. There is lots of crisscrossing going on between dry dock, slipway, patent slip, marine railway, shiplift .... There isn't even a page for the most common name of one method (albeit a brand name), Travelift, or lift ship, as used for the USS Cole.
I suggest the following reorganization:
*Drydock - with Floating dry dock and Graving dock as subsections (pretty much as-is)
*Lift Dock - with Shiplift as a redirect (this because the same basic concept is applied to vessels from the smallest to the really big)
*Marine railway - with Patent slip as a redirect
*Boat Ramp - with Slipway as a redirect
*Travelift
*Lift Ship
Each article would have a common set of links to the others. 
Also, I think a distinction needs to be made between launching ways that have no means to haul a vessel out, and a true marine railway.
Comments? Pjbflynn 06:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments