Talk:LGBT rights in Vietnam

message: Might be a good idea to spell out the acronym in the headline so that the article's subject is clear.
Not to mention that the article seems to be exclusively about homosexuals, not bisexuals or transgendered persons. Frankwomble 18:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that is is WP's standard to call this type of article "LGBT rights in nation" GeekX (talk) 11:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spell out the acronym first, please

message: The content of this article mainly try to describe how the Vietnamese Goverment supressed the rights of LGBT and try to prove that the Vietnamese goverment violates the LGBT rights. Furthermore, the article's content show a dark image of LGBT discrimination, despite the fact that the society and the media is relatively tolerant to the LGBT cases now. The foreign sources of the article seems do not reflect accurately about the situation in Vietnam. This article should be seriously upgraded. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced the fortunecity.com ref by  per self-published source, unless someone can provide a substitution I will remove the tagged information in about one week. Grenouille vert (talk) 06:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you point out which passage you consider POV?  All the facts in this article seem to be also present in the Vietnamese-language article. DHN (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So there's just the thread creator stressing the situation at the end of the Civil Rights § and the well supported earlier text, in a juxtaposition reflecting the living contradiction of the historical situation in roughly the current time. So nothing to do, not POV, just not a simple black-white situation, except for the support for statement like "like many other societies, Vietnam has expressed homophobia and archaic attitudes about homosexuality which have recently been changing". 72.228.177.92 (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on LGBT rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060618203115/http://gapsn.org:80/project2/discussion/dtsang.asp to http://www.gapsn.org/project2/discussion/dtsang.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20131029064313/http%3A//duthaoonline.quochoi.vn/DuThao/Lists/DT_DUTHAO_NGHIQUYET/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=32&TabIndex=1&LanID=56
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517121108/http://conganhatinh.gov.vn/web/guest/9/-/vcmsview/qvgy/1506/1506/6374 to http://conganhatinh.gov.vn/web/guest/9/-/vcmsview/qvgy/1506/1506/6374
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20131029064313/http%3A//duthaoonline.quochoi.vn/DuThao/Lists/DT_DUTHAO_NGHIQUYET/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=32&TabIndex=1&LanID=56
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517011032/http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=24696 to http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=24696
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081029060126/http://www.aegis.com/news/afp/2003/AF030808.html to http://www.aegis.com/news/afp/2003/AF030808.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151128130816/http://saostar.vn/dong-tinh-nam-khong-duoc-phep-hien-mau-nhan-dao.html to http://saostar.vn/dong-tinh-nam-khong-duoc-phep-hien-mau-nhan-dao.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The last sentence in the History section, which talks about the age of consent being 16 in Vietnam regardless of gender or sexual orientation feels out of place. Should we remove it or put it somewhere else in the article? Hoang1nguyen (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove age of consent from History § ? 

message: summary table below says surgery and legal gender changes are allowed, page box up top says they're banned 185.134.5.47 (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency betweem summaries 

message: Actually in the health certificates for you to apply for the military (at least for women as men are obligated to join the armed forces) have a section that requires you being confirmed a hetero by a psychiatrist to be able to serve because  all other sexual orientations are considered "mentally ill" (crazy right?) and thus not eligible. Nobody cares about that requirement anyway but it's there. So should we change the article in that regard? (speaking from my own experience applying to the army and saw people lying about their sexuality to get through) 1.55.164.143 (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any reliable sources that supported this claim? If there are, please add that to the page. This is Wikipedia, so you can edit pages like this. 2402:800:61B1:872B:70ED:914B:2F0B:AE1F (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military services