Talk:Silk

message: (1 image added)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cathypem (talk • contribs) 14:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014

message: Maybe Tussah should get its own subsection describing it. It's not really a type of silk, but a different way of harvesting silk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.59.55 (talk) 04:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tussah

message: In the Odyssey, 19.233, it is mentioned that Odysseus wore a shirt "gleaming like the skin of an onion" (varies with translations, literal translation requested).
The comparison of Odysseus' tunic to the skin of a *dried* onion is actually on two grounds: (a) that it glistened, and (b) that it wrapped the body perfectly due to its softness. Furthermore, verse 235 is somewhat ambiguous, but one of the possible interpretations is that many women (who also made clothes for their families) wondered about the fabric and/or the weaver's skill. The original text reads:
τὸν δὲ χιτῶν' ἐνόησα περὶ χροῒ σιγαλόεντα,
οἷόν τε κρομύοιο λοπὸν κάτα ἰσχαλέοιο·
τὼς μὲν ἔην μαλακός, λαμπρὸς δ' ἦν ἠέλιος ὥς.
ἦ μὲν πολλαί γ' αὐτὸν ἐθηήσαντο γυναῖκες.
And I noted the tunic about his body, all shining
as is the sheen upon the skin of a dried onion, 
so soft it was; and it glistened like the sun. 
Verily many women gazed at him in wonder.
(The English translation comes from http://www.perseus.org)
--212.107.31.35 09:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Odyssey Reference (19.232-235)

message: A very close parallel can be found in Erotokritos, the famous 17th century romance by Vincenzo Kornaros written in the Cretan dialect. In Part II, v. 415-420 the poet describes the (fictional) Prince of Byzantium as he appears before his host, the (fictional) King of Athens:
Eφόρειε κάποιαν φορεσάν, π' όσοι κι αν τη θωρούσι,
ίντά'ναι, πώς να γίνηκε, δεν ξεύρουσι να πούσι·
ήλαμπε τόσο κ' ήστραφτε, που κάθε φως θαμπώνει,
και η λαμπυράδα τση η πολλή την ομορφιάν τση χώνει·
γιατί δεν ήτον μπορετό κιανείς να του σιμώσει,
και [η ακτίνα] τω' ρουχώ' να μην τον-ε θαμπώσει.
He wore a certain dress, which none that looked at it
could say what it was or how it was made;
it glowed and shone so much that it dimmed all other lights
and took its beauty from its great shimmer;
for it was not possible for anyone to go near him
without being dazzled by [the radiance] of his clothes.
(Ad hoc translation from Cretan Greek into English)
This is arguably an allusion to the silk riches of the Byzantine Empire and, most likely, a direct reference to the Odyssey itself.
212.107.31.35 (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-Byzantine Literary Reference

message: <blockqhuote>Perhaps the first evidence of the silk trade is that of an Egyptian mummy of 1070 BC. In subsequent coenturies, the silk trade reached as far as the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, Europe, and North Africa.</blockquote>
Egypt is farther from China than India or the Middle East, so how does it make sense that expansion to those areahs happened "in subslequent centuries"? Nakamura2828 17:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trade Expansion

message: Someone with greater interest in the topic could push this info into the article:
Jeffrey Turner or Nexia Biotechnologies developed silk-producing goats.  =)
: By injecting the orb weaver gene into the father of Mille and Muscade, Nexia bred she-goats whose mammary glands are able to produce the complex proteins that make up spider silk. Their milk looks and tastes like the real thing, but once its proteins are filtered and purified into a fine white powder, they can be spun into tough thread. 
* http://www.nexiabiotech.com/en/03_bio/05.php
-- Sy / (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is cool. I'm going to add it to the spider silk article though, because this page is about silkworm silk. Tocharianne 03:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  silk-producing goats 

message: Mommes is an orphan article that is only linked to from here. I can't think of any other article for which it will be useful to link directly to unit of measure for silk. Any objection to simply merging the article into this one? QuixoticKate 19:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I always support merging orphans, but how about a page for Units of textile measurement? We could include Denier (measure), Tex (unit), Thread count and Thread (unit of measurement) (a cotton yarn measure, equal to 54 inches according to the Thread disambiguation page). (I couldn't find any others.) Tocharianne 21:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a really interesting idea, but I'm not sure how to implement it. The other articles you've named aren't really orphans themselves (5-10 links each). Would we redirect all of those articles to the units of textile measurement article? Maybe the solution is to just create a "Units of Textile Measurement" category. I'm not sure it that really solves the orphan problem, but even though other units of measure have the same problem (see Abcoulomb in :Category:Units of electrical charge, for example). QuixoticKate 16:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true they're not orphans, but they are stubs. (I always support merging stubs, too!) They basically are just different ways of referring to the same thing: the "density" of a fabric. The tex (unit) article says that the difference between tex/denier is just UK vs. US English, and the mommes article says that it's the silk equivalent of thread count. Tocharianne 17:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I'm persuaded that your proposal is the best solution, and I think I'm just going to go ahead and do that once I have time to do so unless anyone else weighs in in the meantime.  QuixoticKate 17:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's done. QuixoticKate 17:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mommes Merger

message: Can anyone try to go find verifications of the mongols under Khan using silk as part of their light armor as protection against arrows?
I will go look myself, because this actually seems to make some sense to me. Ulgar 18:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well that was quick. A google search of "Mongol Armor" led me right back to Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_armour and lo, and behold, I found that it was right there in "Mongolian Armor". Therefore, I suggest that the Citation Needed be taken off. Sound good to everyone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ulgar (talk • contribs) 18:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the citation tag and added a wikilink to Mongolian armour. Tocharianne 23:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text:  Bothersome Ulgar is back again. The paragraph is in the "other uses" section. The first paragraph in the section is just a collection of sentences all about random different uses of silk. The mongolian use of silk is a focused paragraph, and yet second to the miscellanious uses paragraph, messing a bit with the flow. I was going to just reverse the paragraphs (I still will for now) but looking up, I realized that if there's enough of a mention and resource for it, the subject could go under the Uses in History section or whatever, about Genghis Khan's Mongolian Empire. I'm not so bold yet, as things like citations and references are pending, but I want people to consider these things. Ulgar 15:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Silk as Mongol Armor

message: The Properties section contains the following statement: "Its denier is 4.5 g/d when dry and 2.8-4.0 g/d when moist." Denier is a link to another article at Wikipedia that says denier is the mass of a 9,000-meter-long fabric fiber or filament, and the unit is based on silk, of which a 9,000-meter-long filament weighs one gram. Therefore, silk has a denier of one. From the denier article: "The denier has its standard based in nature, a single strand of silk is one denier." Furthermore, the denier article makes no mention of a unit of measurement like "g/d" as it is described for silk. In the statement, "Its denier is 4.5 g/d when dry and 2.8-4.0 g/d when moist," where are these numbers coming from? Where is this unit "g/d" coming from? According to the denier article, silk has a denier of 1, plain and simple, and the silk article should say so. It might even be a point of interest to note that the measurement (denier) is itself based on silk.
JJR512 (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "denier" is a unit of measurement, not a property.  Colloquially it it might be okay to speak of a fiber's "denier" as you would of a container's "liters," but the proper terms are "linear density" and "volume."  And as JJR512 wrote, the linear density of silk is exactly 1 denier by its original definition.  The "g/d" units cited are ...wtf? The standard unit for lin. density is the "tex" anyway. Vreejack (talk) 18:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Removed the weird linear density comments (is 4.5 g/d when dry and 2.8-4.0 g/d when moist) and referred to silk as the standard for the den. Also added a little table comparing moth and spider silk weights.  It's just a taste.  A lot more could be done. This section needs work. Vreejack (talk) 20:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Though silk is strong, you are confusing it with Spider Silk. It should still say physical properties of silk somewhere down the road. Ulgar 03:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Properties

message: the animal rights section says that silk can be made using other means. What are the other means? --Voidvector 23:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk making process 

message: goats make silk
They're genetically engineered goats that produce it in their milk.
:It's one thing to make silk proteins, but quite another to spin them into fibers. Vreejack (talk) 20:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  goats  

message: Silk is strictly forbidden in Islam for men except under some conditions. Women can wear as they please. Make research and make changes to the article accordingly...:-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.34.205.219 (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk in Islam 

message: While the first sentence or two in this section are useful, is it necessary to list every item that might contain silk? I think it might be sufficient to say that the material is used in clothing. Uses for parachutes, etc. could be left in. Thoughts?Bob98133 (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uses section

message: This product is mentioned in the Animal Rights section, but without much detail and without references. Perhaps the new info and reference that was immediately reverted could be worked into this section or as part of the Obtaining filament silk section? It is interesting and as long as it isn't an entire section of its own or just a commercial link, I think the info adds to the article.Bob98133 (talk) 16:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ahimsa silk

message: The new table that was added is an exact copy of the table shown on the page referenced. Is this plagairism? The source is the UN - FAO. Are their materials in the public domain? Thanks Bob98133 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: new table

message: How thick/thin is silk - 1mm/1μm/1nm/1pm?
Does that mean China had already mastered nano technology two millennia ago?Anwar (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thickness 

message: Someone ought to add a section describing the historical and possibly ongoing practice of "weighting"-- adding weight to-- silk by treating it with various chemical compounds, particularly those based on metals. Because silk is sold by weight, the practice increased the selling price of the silk.
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Silk#Silk_Weighting
http://aic.stanford.edu/jaic/articles/jaic28-02-004_indx.html
Possible evidence that the practice continues in silk made in China:
http://www.bikudo.com/archives/trade_leads/24/6280/sell_weighted_silk_scarves.html
24.130.131.219 (talk) 07:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weighting 

message: Just a heads up: the article Underground City (Beijing) links to the Production section. -Samuel Tan 05:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Production section 

message: This was added by 61.2.4.160, (19 November 2008), and was ewmoved "opining needs reference". Still it would be to find out more about coloring silk in natural ways.
As opined by Pandit Haraprasad Sashtri, silk production was quite prevalent in India as early as 600B.C.What is more interesting is that naturally coloured silks were produce by feeding the silkworms with leaves of different trees
:: Researchers from the Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE) in Singapore have discovered a way to create “intrinsically colored” silk by stuffing the worms with a mixture of mulberry leaves and fluorescent dyes.
Source: New Silkworm Diet Naturally Dyes Silk, Reduces Water Consumption-Ecouterre -- － Cy21 ➜ discuss  08:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian silk

message: Unless someone can greatly expand Indian silk, I suggest the material there be added here. - PKM (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Topically, it is better to merge it with Silk in the Indian subcontinent, since it basically includes the general information concerning this topic.--Balthazarduju (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Indian Silk

message: There are plenty of wonderful pictures which would illustrate much better the Chinese silk  than this dark, big scroll, showing some barely visible mountains, which has nothing to do with silk, except for that this dark brown painting  happens to be executed on silk.
This image really doesn't add much value to the article compared whit what is available otherwise. 
There are huge amounts of ancient Chuinese drawings and paintings on Commons that show silk production, ancient Chinese working with silk, wearing silk, painting silk and so on, and all of the would fit in much better in this article. Just take a look at them here . 
Warrington (talk) 15:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, Warrington.  I think you should select the one you feel is the best, and replace the current image.  —fudoreaper (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this image? 

message: I have no idea how true this is but I heard somewhere that silk is bulletproof. There were cases in the west were a silk bandana, while not preventing a bullet penetrating the skull, had no itself been broken. If this is true or there is any evidence, does this merit a place in the article? 
The reason I ask is that I'm a chemistry undergraduate doing a tutorial on polymer chemistry and have a question along the lines of why is Kevlar used in bulletproof vests and silk used to make tights, not the other way round?
::See Ballistic_vest. Short mention in this article makes sense, with link to ballistic vest. Bob98133 (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulletproof? 

message: Currently in the Animal Rights section of the article we have the following text:
: Mahatma Gandhi was also critical of silk production based on the Ahimsa philosophy "not to hurt any living thing." This led to Gandhi's promotion of cotton spinning machines, an example of which can be seen at the Gandhi Institute.
This does not concord with my understanding of why Gandhi promoted village level production of cotton and sounds quite dubious to me. I do understand that there are elements of Indian religious culture, particularly the Jains, who would take a position against silk but I am sceptical that Gandhi did unless someone provides a good reference. I have added a citation needed tag to this section of text. The next step, if no-one provides one, will be deletion. Oska (talk) 06:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but I think that this is just poorly stated. I think that the first sentence can be referenced, but I do not believe that  Gandhi's promotion of cotton spinning machines was related to his distaste for silk. I would say that the second sentence could be deleted since it is not relevant to silk. The first sentence could use a fact tag, too, since it should have a reference. Bob98133 (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gandhi opposed silk production? 

message: I was reading the history section of the article, when I noticed that the Thai and Indian headings did not show any history at all. I can understand the Thai heading, since it has its own article, but the Indian heading only describes their process. Can someone fix this? Alphapeta (talk) 04:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai and Indian silk history 

message: The article on Piezoelectricity mentions silk as a piezoelectric material, but does not expand on this fact(if it's true). Neither does this article mention it. --211.30.103.9 (talk) 06:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. Agree. I have added a sentence under the physical properties section w/ref. Bob98133 (talk) 13:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piezoelectric properties 

message: I'm not familiar with editing wikipedia, or its policies, so I'm not going to do this. But it seems odd to me that there's a section on "Animal Rights" but nothing on the deplorable conditions that children work under in India to produce silk. It's basically slavery. Burn scars, infection and disease are par for the course for children "as young as five". However, I can't find any more recent reporting than 2003 from Human Rights Watch. And I suspect it's not just India.
http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2003/01/22/small-change  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.123.151.24 (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights 

message: I have just updated the reference to Appendix E on Wild Silks in my draft on-line annotated translation of the 3rd century Chinese history, the Weilüe - as it has been listed in the references to this article for a long time but with no footnote given to it or, for that matter, to any other reference. I also added a reference to the similar appendix in my published book, Through the Jade Gate to Rome. I am aware that this might seem like blatant self-promoting, so I thought I should write a brief note here to explain and ask for guidance. These appendices of mine are mostly a series of quotes from other people, and together represent quite a wide collection of information on wild silks. If anyone objects to my referral to my own work, please say so and, if possible, provide other references for this section; alternatively, I could extract the references to the quotes from others I have given in my works, which would illustrate the information in this section. Please do not hesitate to let me know honestly what you think. Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: Though I agree the contribution from User User:Tom.gheysens has been written in a commercial manner, I argue that this new discovery seems of enough significance to be included in Wikipedia. To me it reads as if this commercialization is unintentional and that English is not his first language.
I will try to re-write his section in a more general and compact manner to suit its weight relative to the rest of the article, and will include the proper references.
As I am relatively new to editing Wikipedia, I welcome any assistance and/or suggestions. 
best wishes, Vincentsarego (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demineralizing wild silk 

message: Dear User:Bobbytheonlyone: 
I started editing some of the notes you added to this article on silk when I realised that you have just copied the wording of these notes from the website you gave as a reference. This is not allowed under Wikipedia policy except for short quotes which are clearly marked as such, as this breeches copyright law. I am sure you made these additions in good faith, and they do contain a lot of interesting information but, for copyright reasons, I have now removed them. However, as there is so much good information here, I would be very grateful if you could rewrite the material yourself and then add it again to the article. Many thanks, John Hill (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of silk

message: Dear User:Bobbytheonlyone - I notice you have reinserted the material I deleted which, as I pointed out above, is directly copied from another website. I don't want to start an edit war with you, but I am going to delete it again for the same reasons until either you or someone else rewrites the material in a way that meets Wikipedia's guidelines. Please do not take this personally - I did similar things when I first started editing on Wikipedia and had to be corrected. If you need help just ask here and I am sure you will find someone to help you with it. The information you added IS very interesting and I would like to see it included in the article, but in an acceptable form. I would offer myself to help you with this, but I am travelling overseas and extremely busy at the moment. Do not be disheartened, I am sure you can find a way of adding this information and referencing it properly. Finally, I thank you for removing the rather threatening-sounding message you had posted on my Talk page. Best wishes, John Hill (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of silk (again)

message: "Over 500 countries produce silk" (near bottom)
There are no so many countries on earth!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galanom (talk • contribs) 16:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice spot, removed - Cold Season (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there 500 countries on Earth?? 

message: Hello everyone, I am working for the International Trade Centre (ITC). I would like to propose the addition of an external link that could lead directly to the specific product trade data held by ITC. I would like you to consider this link under the WP:ELYES #3 prescriptions. Moreover, the reliability and the pertinence of this link can be supported by the following facts 
1) ITC is part of the United Nations
2) No registration is required
3) Trade data (imports/exports) are regularly updated
4) The link gives direct access to the trade database referring to the specific product
5) The addition of a link to reliable data could provide an appropriate contribution to this article, as the maps presented among the external links regarding the global trade of silk refer to the year 2006. 
Thank you for your attention.Divoc (talk) 17:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITC external link to trade data 

message: http://www.silk-road.com/artl/silkhistory.shtml  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.99.131.84 (talk) 15:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  some findings place silk as early as 5000BC, earlier than wikiarticle indicated 

message: "The protein fibre of silk is composed mainly of fibroin and produced by certain insect larvae to form cocoons." < Silk is also produced by spiders, those nasty GMO silk goats, a "synthetic spider silk" (apparently used in making many things, including bulletproof vests (wow)), and general synthetic silk... So, WTF is that sentence doing claiming all silk comes from the one type of source? They even put a citation for that sentence, as if that's not one of the most commonly known facts about silk on Earth. And, the introductory bit of the wikia article carries on like that until the last two sentences. My guess is that a different editor added the sentences to fix it, but did not work it in in a way that got rid of it initially pretending that cocoons are the sole source. --174.19.244.195 (talk) 10:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk Sources 

message: what is silk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.131.114 (talk) 23:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  silk 

message: User 87.50.51.170 deleted the Animal Rights section of this article on 30 June 2014 with the comment: "DELETED - This is clearly 'opinion', not 'fact'". I disagree and hence reverted the deletion. This section only quotes opinions by others and is well sourced. It could use some stylistic cleanup, but this is reason to improve it, not delete it. That silk is an animal-rights issue is well known, so it's not as though the section is unwarranted in this article. I can't see a good justification for omitting an animal-rights section to this article. Brian Tomasik (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored animal-rights section 

message: In the dis-ambiguation section it says "Chinese silk children" instead of Chinese silk chicken.  Can someone correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.128.192.34 (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mis-typing 

message: On the redirect note about 'Silkie' chickens, it says 'children' instead of chicken, shouldn't this be changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.150.215 (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicken 

message: Regarding the recent edits removing, re-adding, and again removing, a quote from Ecofashionworld.com, regarding silk made through a process in which the silkworms are not killed prior to unwinding the silk from a cocoon, User:Jackiebrown034 is probably right that it is, if not a direct advertisement, at least pretty close to one. I do not understand the edit summary, however. Jackiebrown034 wrote that the ad exploits silkworms. Well, I did a Google search for peace silk. I mostly found sites advertising peace silk for sale. Here is a site that looks like a blog but may also be a commercial site; I'm not sure: 
If that is an acceptable source, then perhaps the definition there would be appropriate for the article. If not, then I'll keep looking. I think mention of peace silk would add to the article if a reliable source can be found. CorinneSD (talk) 01:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peace silk 

message: If we should have this kind of pictures, there are much better quality available. Hafspajen (talk) 08:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The colors and details of the pictures in the first gallery are fainter because the painting, Sericulture by Liang Kai at the Cleveland Museum of Art, is over 700 years old. The pictures are more historically significant and informative than those in the second gallery. Based on the Wikimedia Commons description, the pictures in the second gallery are by an unknown artist from an obscure book written in the 1920s. That book, Everyday Life in Old China, isn't even available on WorldCat. --MuseumGeek (talk) 15:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was added to the article. 

message: It is known as "Paat" in eastern India is a wrong info. In Assam "Paat" or "Pat" is "a type of Mulberry Silk", not silk itself. In West Bengal "Paat" means "Jute". - দিব্য দত্ত (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is known as "Paat" in eastern India! 

message: In the Middle Ages the Venetians imported large quantities of silk from Asia and Greece especially from the Peloponnese. After 1400 with the conquest of the territories in North Italy, they started to produce silk locally. I read about ships on their way to Palermo, but I've never seen texts or books that specifically cite the silk of Catanzaro for the Middle Ages.
I think that tour guide is no reliable source for an encyclopedia, it is necessary something better.
The song of this text seems hyperbolic:
"..Catanzaro became the lace capital of the world with a large silkworm breeding facility that produced all the laces and linens used in the Vatican. The city was world-famous for its fine fabrication of silks, velvets, damasks and brocades..."
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.228.90 (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk of Catanzaro ? 

message: No mention about what would have become one of the major and renowned silk manufacturing centres in Europe - Como.
https://www.museosetacomo.com/?lang_id=2  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.46.180.165 (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk of Como ? 

message: I added two related articles--they seem to overlap and also overlap with the main silk article. Should they be merged or changed? Tussar silk and Wild silk. Rsjaffe (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related articles--are some duplicates? 

message: I would like to add some applications of silk as a biomaterial, which is an important area.
Yuntengcao (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk as a biomaterial 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Silk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150110040554/http://www.lullingstonecastle.co.uk/component/content/article/223 to http://www.lullingstonecastle.co.uk/component/content/article/223
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071202155627/http://www.geospace.co.uk/silk/worldsilk.html to http://www.geospace.co.uk/silk/worldsilk.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071231034911/http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977152137 to http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977152137
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Silk is also edible it is also super nutritious from all the protein it has you can make protein shakes with them.
How to make silk protein shakes first you need one bolt of PURE silk then you crunch up the silk with something then after put the silk in a blender. after you then need protein powder fruits that you like and favorite yogurt. Brando747 (talk) 06:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: - Please be more specific and repost your request. You have to propose the exact textual change you require. The request must be of the form "please change X to Y". On another note, also please give sources to the information provided. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 11:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2017 

message: The first sentence of the second paragraph ("Silk is produced by...") needs rewritten. Perhaps some punctuation (commas) is needed to make it make sense.173.90.65.191 (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I've made the change as suggested - thanks.  Pastychomper (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence rewrite needed, please 

message: «The first evidence of the long distance silk trade is the finding of silk in the hair of an Egyptian mummy of the 21st dynasty, c.1070 BC.» it says in this article, but the 'proof' is a disputed find from 1993. Irene Good at Harvard University writes in an article from 2002: «A subsequent examination of the Deir al Medina mummy has thrown serious doubt on the interpretation of this find, however, which is most likely a remnant of a 20th century conservation treatment.»
Good's full article can be found here: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1517&context=tsaconf
Thomasberg (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk on Egyptian mummies? 

message: Change X to Y where,
X = It is known as Resham in eastern and north India, and Pattu in southern parts of India.
Y = It is known as Resham in eastern and north India, ರೇಷ್ಮೆ (Rēṣme) in southern state of Karnataka, and Pattu in some other (where?) southern parts of India.
Clarification: With 100 % confidence, Silk is called ರೇಷ್ಮೆ (Rēṣme) in southern state of Karnataka. No idea about where Pattu is used.
Proof and pronunciation: https://translate.google.com/#view=home&op=translate&sl=en&tl=kn&text=silk GovWin (talk) 11:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Your source does not appear to support your claim. It says nothing about any particular region of India. You can reopen this request by changing the “answered” paremeter from “yes” to “no” once you’ve found a more suitable source. Also, please cite your sources in Wiki format. Thanks! — Tartan357  (Talk) 13:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 May 2020 

message: Please remove this
 In Vietnamese legend, silk appeared in the first millennia AD and is still being woven today.
and add this
 In Vietnamese legend, silk appeared in the first millennium AD and is still being woven today.
"first...AD" is singular, so "millennia" (plural) doesn't fit. 2601:5C6:8081:35C0:991:EAC1:5F75:1CC0 (talk) 01:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 10:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2020 

message: Add "and stitched" after "woven" in the first sentence. Floressydney (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you stitch threads of silk into a piece of textile? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you can. Silk sewing threads are available, and stitching is often done into pieces textile. Pastychomper (talk) 12:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2021 

message: Rashi 132.154.232.8 (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science fibre to fabric 

message: Jshbsbsbhdhhdsnnsnakaksjdjdbdndnsns 103.171.77.238 (talk) 13:45, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silk 

message: How many silks are thèîr 2401:4900:619B:E5C7:0:0:431:BF75 (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 

message: Search 2401:4900:60E5:1BF9:446C:79FF:FED0:2042 (talk) 15:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cotton thread Wikipedia 

message: the biggest difference between the wild and commecial silk is the LENGTH which is said and explained exactly once. where does this information come from and what are the lengths needed. eg sheep wool is curly and is easily spon with 'short' fiber/hair. Cotton is fluffy and real short. Silk is Not curly and Not edged or fluffy so i expect it to be "slippery" aka smooth as it feel. without resistence off the fiber itself its more difficult to spin (or weeve at micro-level!), then what are those lengths needed and what are the legths found in the wild. Is it possible to select fibers at length ??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.149.83.125 (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  length 

message: See above. 82.19.244.252 (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why wouldn't the feature image be...a picture of some silk? 

message: Aside from silk being one of the strongest fabrics, silk is also a hypoallergenic fabric that is durable and also has healing properties. Silk is a very well-known natural fabric that is very luxurious and elegant and the good thing about it is that when wearing it in the cold winter climate it retains body heat and when wearing it in the hot summer weather it eliminates extra heat. Lescas15 (talk) 00:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023 

message: Norashenyh (talk) 03:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023 (2) 

message: Mechanical Properties
Silk is a natural bio-composite, the brin filaments serve as the reinforcement phase and the sericin as the matrix phase. The brin contributes impressive stiffness and strength to the composite while the sericin is responsible for load transfer and binding the brin together.[1] Like all biofibers, the mechanical properties of silk can vary dramatically depending on sourcing and processing. The tensile strength of Bombyx mori silk typically falls anywhere in the range of 0.1-1 GPa, comparable to some grades of steel. Elongation at break is between 15 and 35 %, making the toughness/breaking energy roughly 6x104 J/kg.[2] Comparably, Tussah silk fibers (from wild silkworms) have a similar ultimate tensile strength but show a marked improvement in elongation at break. This increased toughness is a result of a relatively high proportion of amorphous structure in the fibers, as opposed to the highly crystalline nature of the Bombyx mori fibers.[3] 
Silk fibers used in the textile industry undergo a degumming process in which the sericin is removed via boiling in an alkali soap solution to break the peptide bonds which hold it together.[4] Sericin removal eliminates the stickiness of natural silk fiber, a necessity for weaving, but also eliminates silk’s natural load transfer mechanism. As a result, processed silk has a lower elongation and toughness than unprocessed silk.
It is important to note that relative humidity can have a dramatic effect on the strength of silk. A study performed in 2012 showed a linear decrease in tensile strength of both the warp and weft directions with increasing relative humidity at room temperature.[5] This loss in strength is due to the hydrolysis of existing hydrogen bonds in the fiber, decreasing chain-to-chain interactions and therefore increasing chain mobility. 
References:
[1] Chen, S., Liu, M., Huang, H., Cheng, L., & Zhao, H.-P. (2019). Mechanical properties of Bombyx mori silkworm silk fibre and its corresponding silk fibroin filament: A comparative study. Materials & Design, 181, 108077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108077
[2] Wilding, M. A. & Hearle, J. W. S. in Polymeric Materials Encyclopaedia Vol. 11 (ed. Salamone, J. C.) 8307–8322 (CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 1996).
[3] Cheung, H.-Y., Lau, K.-T., Ho, M.-P., & Mosallam, A. (2009). Study on the mechanical properties of different silkworm silk fibers. Journal of Composite Materials, 43(22), 2521–2531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998309345347
[4] Gulrajani, M. L. (1992). Degumming of silk. Review of Progress in Coloration and Related Topics, 22(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1992.tb00091.x
[5] Iqbal, M., Sohail, M., Ahmed, A., Ahmed, K., Moiz, A., & Ahmed, K. (2012). Textile environmental conditioning: Effect of relative humidity variation on the tensile properties of different fabrics. Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation, 02(02), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.4236/jasmi.2012.22017 76.157.122.137 (talk) 04:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition/Edit for Properties 

message: The article should mention silk paper is made from clay and celulose. 79.106.203.48 (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper