Talk:Annals of Mathematics

message: It appears that, since 30 June 2008, the electronic version is only available to print subscribers?
130.238.58.63 (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appears not to be Open Access any longer 

message: This article currently (and previously) says that the Annals of Mathematics started life as The Analyst, but I'm not convinced that this is correct.  JSTOR is the only source I can find that claims that to be the case.  Notably, the Annals of Mathematics itself does not anywhere claim that, and instead claims to have been founded in 1884.  Also, this 1905 address that discusses both journals doesn't say that they are the same journal with a name change, but treats them as separate.  The Analyst did disappear at the end of 1883, with Hendricks mentioning in the last issue that he was trying to make arrangements for it to reappear under new management, and Annals of Mathematics perhaps not coincidentally appeared at the beginning of 1884.  However I think it would be more accurate to say that the Annals immediately filled the void left by the Analyst, unless someone can find a source (other than JSTOR) claiming it to be a renaming of the same journal. --Delirium 01:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been wondering this also, and have read the sources you mention.  However, I am not fully convinced by Fiske's remarks.  I think it may be best just to email JSTOR and ask their reasons for their statement that the Annals "continues" the Analyst.  --C S (Talk) 12:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable.  I emailed the Annals of Mathematics but they didn't seem to have any good historical information readily available beyond what's on their website (presumably they do have archives somewhere, but maybe not well-organized ones).  I'll see if I can get a reply from JSTOR. --Delirium 07:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In answer to a query from my talk page about the above: I never got a reply from JSTOR, but I did find an old journal article (in a 1932 volume of Scripta Mathematica) that described the Annals as "a continuation of the Analyst". That provides at least some evidence, besides the coincidence and Hendricks's comment in the last issue of the Analyst that he planned to arrange for a continuation, that the two journals actually are considered the same. --Delirium (talk) 07:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  possibly not originally The Analyst 

message: Should both abbeviations of the journal be included in the lede, as in this revision? Previous discussion can be seen at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Academic_Journals#Abbreviation_standards. Please leave your opinion below. — Carl (CBM · talk) 11:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems sensible to include both. --Salix (talk): 11:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC: should both abbreviations be mentioned in the lede 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Annals of Mathematics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202041814/http://cdn.elsevier.com:80/assets/excel_doc/0003/148548/title_list.xlsx to http://cdn.elsevier.com/assets/excel_doc/0003/148548/title_list.xlsx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: (and other watchers of this article) I wonder if you have any thoughts on adding content to this article along the lines of the frequency of paper published in this journal from non-US/Europe countries and its correlation with the author winning the Fields Medal or being an ICM speaker. To cite one example it took 60 years for a paper from West Bengal to appear in this journal after January 1954 by Satyendra Nath Bose. Note the author of the 2014 paper is Mahan Mj professor at the Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University (RKMVU was the only private university in WB, was set up under a central legislation, till the Techno India University setup in 2012 under state legislation). Solomon7968 14:17, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if it's already noted in other published sources. Otherwise it would be original research. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My source for the above claim is the National Assessment and Accreditation Council evaluative report for RKMVU which explicitly noted the 60 year old gap. OR withstanding why don't you write a blog post related to the topic which will help other potential math students get hold of a perspective how difficult it is to publish a paper in this journal. Solomon7968 02:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content