lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Greenbone

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Opistognathidae

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be Opistognathidae rather than Opisthognathidae?
http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/FamilySummary.php?Family=Opistognathidae
nestor pamir 00:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in the title 

message: I'm glad User:Aesisk took initiative and rewrote this page to add more information, however, the rewrite is (in my opinion) less encyclopedic in voice, formatted incorrectly, removes the opening paragraph, and the main reference it cites is a broken link to an IP address. I think it's best to revert their changes entirely, and invite them to edit these additional facts into the existing article, keeping the form and original references. Kuilin (talk) 20:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite by Aesisk
Talk:Dwarf gourami

message: Could someone add photos of a female for comparison? Color, as well as dorsal fin shape? Jake4d (talk) 03:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I too found it odd that the article featured no photograph of a female. There was one at the Commons, so I added it. Surtsicna (talk) 15:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the female pics? 

message: If you own a pretty fish, you can put it in a 5 gallon tank. You can’t put it with any other fishes tho. If you put pretty fish with other fish pretty fish will eat all of the other fish. 2603:9001:4D05:1936:C888:7C52:4205:20A5 (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty fish 

message: I have a male dwarf gourami and he is anything but "timid" - he is tank boss of the platys and tetras. Male dwarf gouramis actually can be quite aggressive especially if there are females in the tank. The opinions on behavior in the aquarium should be taken out, as fish behavior depends greatly on size of tank, water parameters, whether or not it has live plants and other decor to obstruct line-of-sight, and number/species of tankmates. 2601:18D:400:5E90:DD83:37BA:BE79:DFAA (talk) 10:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dwarf gouramis are timid?
Talk:Paradise fish

message: What is up with the picture for this article??? A man with a bottle in his buttocks??? Never mind. It got reverted.Mizunori (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

message: I've had one of these! They are a bit aggressive--Cucumberkvp (talk) 18:28, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've had one of these 

message: "This species is one of the few fish that can change its color (lighter or darker) in response to stimuli."
I do not think there are few species of fish capable to change their colors. I would rather say it is a quite spread ability. --Mparu ∞ (msg) 10:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Color changes

message: This article can be improved by adding more links to references, as well as more references that can be added as footnotes throughout the article. Many of the references have no links. Sentences and claims regarding paradise fish behavior and disease control could be strengthened by adding citational support. For example, under "Disease control," the sentence "The infection rate for dengue fever has subsequently increased in the human population, caused in part by to the lack of natural mosquito predators" should be backed up by citations that show that the dengue fever infection rate has actually increased. Kezchow (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation: Needs More Citation/References 

message: I wonder if "abusive" is the best term to use in an encyclopedia entry to describe this fish's behavior. LaivineOrodrim (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Abusive"?
Talk:Pearl gourami

message: Is it Trichogaster leerii or Trichogaster leeri?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.228.172 (talk) 10:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Trichopodus leerii, see article for references. Kat (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the scientific name?
Talk:Three spot gourami

message: I feel that the large space at the beginning of the article should be removed. Anyone agree? --<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: Turquoise">GouramiWatcher</span> (Gulp) 15:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I might agree, and it's my fault that it's there! Here's what is going on. I was traveling over the Thanksgiving weekend, and saw the page on someone else's computer/monitor, and there was a really ugly run-over of the lead section infobox into the next section, which the "clear" template fixed. Now, I'm home at my usual computer and monitor, and I definitely see what you mean. It's a problem of computer-to-computer. I almost self-reverted, but it occurs to me that there will be other readers who see the page the way that I saw it before. Instead of removing the "clear", would it be an option to reduce the size of the infobox, either by moving the second image that you added out of the box and into the text, or by reducing the size of both images? --Tryptofish (talk) 23:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I rearranged the pictures on the page, but there is still the white space there. Any other ideas?--<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: Turquoise">GouramiWatcher</span> (Gulp) 15:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the clear. On the toss up between having the infobox overlap and having a huge blank space the overlap is better. Overlaps happen all the time from infoboxes, and aren't necessarily bad. Small article like this suffer though, having not much prose but an infobox that would fit in a much better article. I shifted the other photo lower and left to try and improve aesthetics. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

text: I just cut the width by getting rid of a nonbreakingspace. Does that look better? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, both of you! It looks good to me. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout
Talk:New Zealand bigeye

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Trouser Press

message: --Iranyc 15:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this article be about, you know, actual trouser presses?--Josquius 11:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  That would be Trouser press, which doesn't exist, and they should be disambiguated so they point to each other.  Feel free!  bikeable (talk) 23:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Being shocked at the absence of a WP article on this most important of appliances, I have been bold and created a stub. :) DWaterson 20:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trouser press 

message: This is the thing i discovered today while reading Dreams Less Sweet. Fortunately the Wayback Machine has this page archived. Gleb95 (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The online version is unavailable 
Talk:Paristiopterus labiosus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: These sources may be useful to anyone interested in expanding this article.
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Unfortunately I do not have time to research and expand this article myself, at the moment. But leaving these here in case useful to others. Desertborn (talk) 02:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources for expanding article
Talk:Pentaceros japonicus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 05:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Longfin boarfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Valid name is Zanclistius elevatus (ITIS)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex.vasenin (talk • contribs) 15:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid scientific name
Talk:Pentaceros richardsoni

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 10:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Striped boarfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Graph manifold

message: It seems unlikely that the name "graph manifolds" comes from the JSJ decomposition, because JSJ decomposition was invented in the mid-70's whereas Waldhausen's original article (,,Eine Klasse von 3-dimensionalen Mannigfaltigkeiten") was published in 1967, and uses this very denomination (,,Graphenmannigfaltigkeit").
The convenient representation by graphs is already in Waldhausen's article (9 ,,Klassification der ,meisten' reduzierten Graphenmannigfatigkeiten"). According to Hatcher, this article is in fact very close to the discovery of JSJ-decomposition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.77.128.41 (talk) 15:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Darter (fish)

message: i'm going to add the list of darters that was already on this article and also add a list of darters from other genera (as in the percidae article). let me know if there's a problem with this. Ryan shell 02:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: list

message: The link on this fish links back to the same page Gibby is gibby (talk) 23:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Iowa Darter
Template talk:WDCSB schools

message: Is there any point in having redlinks for all the primary schools? The few bluelinks are redirects to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board (except "Christ the King" which redirects interestingly, to another school board!)  I've just redirected Blessed Sacrament Catholic School to the school board - somewhat reluctantly, given that a lot of editing had been done on it over the years, but it really doesn't seem to have any claim to notability. PamD 14:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to primary schools
Talk:Will Rogers phenomenon

message: Is there a name for the opposite phenomenon? In other words, what if the smartest of the Californians had left for Oklahoma, thereby lowering the average intelligence of both states (so to speak)? 67.171.222.203 (talk) 03:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Obvious Question Would Be... 

message: Having reviewed the literature, I have not seen any reference to this being described as a form of an "equivocation fallacy". Perhaps someone could direct me to a reference? If this is not forthcoming, I think that reference to this being an equivocation fallacy should be removed since I think that this is misrepresenting the problem.
2A02:6B66:D964:0:8001:938E:6EE5:EC66 (talk) 10:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure why there is reference to this being a form of an equivocation fallacy?
Talk:Lucian (Underworld)

message: Greg Cox, among others, has stated that Blood Enemy is a fan fiction and is non-canon to the series. Any information from the book should not be used. Even the comics are appearing to be contradictory to what is being shown in the prequel, but that can't be assured until January. AlessaGillespie (talk) 06:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood Enemy 

message: I reverted the redirect on this page, since it went to a page that didn't mention Lucian. If there is a better redirect, maybe that could be implimented. Mathewignash (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be redirected to Underworld (film series)#Characters. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted redirect
Talk:Watercress darter

message: History of Birmingham’s Endangered Watercress Darter’ by W. Mike Howell 2600:1700:7B9F:1C00:3556:FECD:8C41:C530 (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New book
Talk:Zander

message: The link for reference 4 is invalid.
77.12.56.117 (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

message: The maximum size is listed as 44 lbs. This seems incorrect, zander do not grow this large. I added the current world record size (25.3 lbs) and citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6014:62:DCBC:19C6:C79F:59F (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Finnish language version of this article states the official Finnish zander record as , so either your claimed 25 lbs world record is way off the mark or we're talking about different species. Also, given that the Finnish 37 lbs record is not all that different from the 44 lbs world record mentioned in this article — and I don't think Finland has any claim on the world record for zander — I'm going to assume that the 44 lbs is not incorrect. Hence, I'll remove the 'dubious' tag. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Note that the 25.3 lb record is "the IGFA All-Tackle world record" which presumably implies a specimen caught with a rod and line. This does not contradict the possibility of larger specimens having been observed and/or caught by, say, netting. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.193.131.207 (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum size
Talk:Hemerocoetes artus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Hemerocoetes macrophthalmus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem