Talk:Han (Warring States)

message: Wasn't this a holdover the Han dynasty?  Jiang 19:41, 6 Aug 2003
:unfortunately no, the state of Han was an independent political entity. kt2 22:30, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I'm looking for historical sources besides Shiji that describes the state of Han. Any recommendations? Hanfresco (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Hanfresco. Well done on the viscount thing. See the discussion here for where this started. As for information on the State of Han - see chapters 1 - 6 of the 資治通鑒 Zizhi Tongjian (sourced from Chinese Wikipedia). Philg88 (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 可以参考《竹书纪年》、《战国策》，现代文献可以看看杨宽的《战国史》。—星光下的人 (talk) 02:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is English Wikipedia, please make your contributions in English. Thanks. Philg88 (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you both! I will take a look in the near future. Hanfresco (talk) 09:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: 资治通鉴第六卷：
始皇帝十七年（辛未，公元前二三○年）
1　内史〔腾〕(胜)灭韩
Since Zizhi Tongjian says Han was destroyed in 230BC, I'm going to revert your edit. Hanfresco (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Date

message: Nobody is going to confuse one of the Warring states with the modern South Korea. The relation to the dynasty, ethnicity, etc. however is glaring in its omission. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other things Han unmentioned except for one that shouldn't be. 

message: 星光下的人, 你根本没读我留的言。我让你看的是吴语维基的参考。吴语维基的参考是寒山碧著的韩氏三千年。我再次撤销你的贡献。
Translation: you clearly did not read what I wrote. I said read the REFERENCE of the Wu wiki page. If you had, you would notice the Wu wiki referenced a book called "Han Shi San Qian Nian" by Han Shanbi. I will once again undo your edit. Hanfresco (talk) 07:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 我可以告诉你那本书是本族谱，不是可靠来源。史记、战国策、世本、竹书纪年都没有记载那几代韩国君主的名字，可以了吗？I tell you 韩氏三千年 is a Genealogy book,that is not identifying reliable source, all of Records of the Grand Historian,Zhan Guo Ce,The Book of Lineages,Bamboo Annals are not recorded those monarch's name,OK?——星光下的人 (talk) 10:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 星光下的人 is right on this one.  The names of several Han rulers are not recorded in history.  However, I would suggest that you state your reason in the edit summary when removing content, otherwise people may misunderstand your action as vandalism.  --Zanhe (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Okay, fair enough. Hanfresco (talk) 01:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruler names 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chen (state) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 22:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: While Shen Buhai is known, on a tertiary basis, for defensive reforms, the source for Shen Buhai's military reforms in this article sources https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004201644/B9789004201644_002.xml
I don't see how this source relates with Shen Buhai. As the writer for Shen Buhai, I would be interested in locating the relevant source. I don't immediatly how this source pertains to it. It says "Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature (vol. 2)". I will attempt to check this source. If it is located there I will delete this comment.FourLights (talk) 21:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shen Buhai military reform source 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 18:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Han (state) →  – Dab from other uses at Han (disambiguation)#Former states. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 February 2024 

message: I've tagged the sentence Qi to the east as dubious because the map of the Warring States clearly show that Chu is to both the south and east of Han. Banedon (talk) 06:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious