Wikipedia talk:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions

message: I'm going to refactor this so it's organized more like an RFA (sections for keep/delete). If this bothers anyone, speak now or forever hold your peace. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please go ahead! --- Charles Stewart 01:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Complete. I had to lose some of the userboxes people were linking inline (they were screwing up the numbering). I also took the opportunity to reformat the threaded responses so they all used the correct indentation. Now to go take a break, that was a pain in the ass. :P —Locke Cole • t • c 02:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Refactor

message: Close this topic! 150-some votes to keep over 20-some votes to delete. 15:2. Maybe this issue is solved?! --Shell 02:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has only been out less than 24 hours. __earth 06:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CLOSE

message: If this discussion has given Wikipedia nothing else, it has afforded creative voting syntax. I am listing my favorite so far below.  If you find others particularly entertaining, please add them. — Eoghanacht talk 14:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked Delete them all and salt the earth after though I don't agree with the sentiment. - Cuivienen 03:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creative votes 

message: I found many more userboxes to use from the list of proposed deletions.  Take that!  :D  Rogue 9 23:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Well, one good thing came of this.

message: I am moving the following comments here from the project page.  These were added after the discussion was closed, in violation of Wikipedia norms and policies.  Divorced from context, these may not be all that useful, but you can still check the page history to figure out where they fit.  Someone may have a better way to refactor this, if it matters.
Informative messages, such as links to the other relevant discussion(s), and reminders that editing the page is not allowed, have been left.
The page has been protected. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 15:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Ironic" is a personal attack? Puh-leeze. Benami 21:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason to use foul language, User:Kelly Martin, we all know the system would create redirects, but we wanted to clean the system and not create hundreds of redirects. TCorp 15:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, of course: the ratio of keep to delete votes changed dramatically after Larix posted the TfD notices. He was right to bring this notice to the attention of the people who use userboxes, but I think the result would have been achieved more effectively had the notice been on the template's talk page: I think most people put templates they use on their watchlist, and it would not have introduced the same prejudging of the issue that finding your user page disrupted is liable to bring. --- Charles Stewart 17:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments placed after closing 

message: No i do not want any user boxes deleted. No I am sick of every other day of having my userboxes interfered with. No, I will not want any userboxes deleted tomorrow, next week, or next month. Leave it alone. What is the reasonsing of these people? They are USERboxes, a form of expression. There is no reason to regulate this to this extent. ENOUGH! --Zaphnathpaaneah 16:16, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Get this crap off of my userboxes!!!

message: If people haven't noticed by now this ended many days ago. If feel the urge to talk there is a place just for you: WP:UBP. Please stop firing this page up on my watchlist.--God of War 15:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  voting is over