lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Academic disciplines

message: Many of the articles here should be sorted into subcategories. -- Beland 23:47, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Maurreen 16:25, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

message: :It could be improved if there were outlines or brief introductions of the topic before introducing the linksEva.Pilay (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2018  (UTC)Eva.Pilay
I noticed that both Earth Sciences and Geology were not included on the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObliqueFault (talk • contribs) 05:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Another field that could be added to the list is Business and the subcategories of business including Accounting and Marketing.Deidran19 (talk) 05:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement  

message: I remove academia category for remove the loops.Zipodu (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove academia category 

message: This is written well within the lines of being relevant to the topic of the text.  Ladylanie27 (talk) 02:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance
Talk:Morgan Earp

message: I've found a picture of Morgan Earp. I have not asked for using it, probably someone of you reading this will do.
http://ferncanyonpress.com/tombston/images/morgan.jpg
--212.119.139.97 23:52, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Morgan Photo

message: That's a nice piece of trivia, but there have been many "authentic" Earp pistols floating about for years. They are hard to verify. We don't even know from the historical record the serial numbers for any but Billy Clanton and Frank McLaury's pistols. Beware.
When Mark Twain was in Europe he said he saw two skulls of Columbus. "One as a boy, one as a man." :) Sbharris 19:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Morgan's pistol

message: "Morgan was the least experienced, since it was his first gunfight." But the previous section describes one in Butte. This needs to be reconciled. Chris the speller 18:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  O.K. his first gunfight? 

message: An article about the Earp brothers without mentioning brothels and pimping, especially pimping their wives. How odd 65.79.173.135 (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving Out Brothels and Pimping 

message: Morgan's murder would seem to be a qualifying event for inclusion there, as his activities made him a target of gang members/sympathizers.  knoodelhed (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death not mentioned in ODMP or NLEOMF 

message: A section title that is contradicted by the first paragraph. How can you have a section called "Civil War Service" for someone who nevr served?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:283:4601:A446:6572:623D:715D:38D9 (talk) 03:11, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil War Service
Talk:Great Hacker War

message: As interesting as this article may be, it has three references, one of which does not appear to be "Independent of the subject" as required by WP:NOT, and it clearly has NPOV issues, though I can see why. :P
Sephiroth storm (talk) 14:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: This part reads like conjecture or opinion. It may be factual, but the tone doesn't lend itself to believing it. One part that stands out is the part that reads ever. Just that word, mainly, but the whole section needs a good proofreading.
Also is the SCCS system mentioned the UNIX source code control system?
Family Guy Guy (talk) 04:41, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The truth of the matter" 

message: This article really needs a cleanup. To be honest, I would have nominated it for deletion, but I see there has already been a deletion discussion. I'm just going to list some clear problems:
* There is no date or timeline information for any of the events discussed here
* It appears to have been mostly or entirely written by insiders, calling the neutrality of the article into dispute
* It's very unclear which information is derived from which sources
* The intro states that the "war" happened, then that it didn't happen, then that it did happen but wasn't serious enough to be called a "war". I seriously can't tell from this article what actually occurred - so I would recommend someone who understands the subject matter does a thorough re-write.
20WattSphere (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write Priorities
Talk:Irish Home Rule bills

message: I'm not too hot on British consitutional law, but I presume that if as stated it received royal assent, that means it was enacted, and entered on the statute book. Whether it was commenced or applied may be another question. At any rate, that's how it would work in Irish law. Can anyone clear this up? Palmiro 18:18, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite correct.  Simplifying things a bit: the 1914 Act was supposed to have gone into effect in May, 1915, but the Suspensory Act 1914 (assented to on the same day as the home rule bill itself) put that into limbo for the duration of the war.  Because in British law the war wasn't formally terminated until Aug. 31, 1921, the suspension of home rule was still in force when the Government of Ireland Act 1920 (which repealed the 1914 Act) was passed.  Silverhelm 12:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Home Rule Bill "never enacted"? 

message: I moved this article to Irish Home Rule Movement  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmckeon ie (talk • contribs) 18:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved article
Talk:List of films set in Las Vegas

message: It is necessary to have two sample movies in the table to make it clear how to add one more.
Tabletop 00:36, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It should really start out with five entries or be deleted. Anyways, it's a four now. -- User:Docu
Not really sure how to suggest changes here, but I want to point out what seems to me to be a glaring omission from the list, Francis Ford Coppola's "One From the Heart" (1982) http://www.amazon.com/One-From-Heart-Frederic-Forrest/dp/B004TP55RK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1371819696&sr=8-1&keywords=one+from+the+heart  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFBB:B160:B15F:E45:A951:7585 (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comments
Talk:Repentance in Judaism

message: In reference to the above comment, what does the oral say about the topic? And within the oral traditions and literature, who speaks directly for God or His Law (that's rhetorical, we know no one does expect the prophets). The oral teachings have always been seen more as "interpretive" rather than prophetic and divinely-given. So, if we’re basing our discussion strictly on the Law of YHWH (as given to Moshe), then the adherents of Christianity would seem accurate. In many cases, the Divine Torah Law does attach and mandate Levitical sacrifice accompanied by Teshuva. At the end of the day, they're ultimately correct. HBCALI (talk) 18:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torah Law ? 

message: Rather than build up parallel Hebrew/English versions, the HatNoted stub named Baal Tehuva might find a better home within Main Article Repentance in Judaism. Part of this would be to add "==One who repents==" as a new section, after "Repentance and creation" Yunmagz (talk) 21:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  A Baal Teshuva is more akin to what Christians call "born again." It is not directly related to the concept of repenting for a sin.  --GHcool (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Human microbiome

message: Given the advances across various assay platforms which are now routinely used in the world of human microbiome R&D, it would be very informative to the readers to add a paragraph that talks about the study of the microbially derived metabolites using targeted and untargeted approaches and an example of the microbiome derived GPCR ligands that modulate human biology.  HasselbladWhisperer (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multi-omics of the human microbiome 

message: Define Normal flora. 2409:40F0:D:BD62:7872:53FF:FEDC:AC5D (talk) 04:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The commensal/symbiotic microbe species inhabiting a person's body. The exact species that are normally present will vary from person to person, hence why "normal flora" is used instead of anything more specific. Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micra biology
Talk:Albert Ellis

message: The source on Ellis’s froutteurism is Ellis himself, as the article cites his 2010 autobiography. Without other evidence we can’t claim that “Ellis committed copious sexual assaults.” We can only say that, as the previous version stated, “Ellis wrote…”
Salvador Dalí wrote in his autobiography that he deliberately kicked his three year old sister in the head, that he threw a boy off a suspension bridge, that he was impotent until the age of thirty, and that he beat a little girl bloody, among other things. This is as damning as anything Ellis said and yet no one automatically assumes it’s true, because it's clear that some people will exaggerate or lie for attention and effect. But an encyclopedia can't do this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lajjaasu (talk • contribs) 21:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence and Accuracy

message: He would have been age 28 in 1941.  How did Ellis avoid the draft all through WWII?  The article does not explain how he financed full-time study at Columbia during these war years, before he started a part-time practice.  Did he do absolutely nothing for the 4-year war effort?Starhistory22 (talk) 07:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) Since he was plagued will debilitating health problems his entire life, he likely wouldn't have been fit to serve. (2) He got an accounting degree before he became a psychologist, because he wanted to be able to support himself. He had also been a good student, and may have received scholarships and grants. Lajjaasu (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII
Talk:T. K. Wetherell

message: What a ridiculous last line of a summary of a notable person's life. This sounds like it was written from the perspective of someone with an axe to grind, not an objective third party. How about try again?
49.197.56.132 (talk) 22:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "His salary was ranked among the top ten for public university presidents in the United States."
Talk:J. Graham Brown School

message: I don't mean to be disrespectful, and I'm sure Ellison was a fine person, but was she notable in an encyclopedic sense? — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 01:03, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Ellison notable?

message: Why are they judged it is not right. Lady223313 (talk) 01:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gays 
Talk:Rupert of Salzburg

message: *Feast Day:  The source I used for the feast day is Lives of the Saints, by the Catholic Book Publishing Co., New York, with a nihil obstat and imprimatur from the archdiocese of NY renewed 1977.  If there are any other dates, please cite the source of the information.  As stated, the article indicates only the feast day in the Roman Catholic Church, which is all that the Catholic Book Publishing is concerned with.  I have no doubts that other old churches would have different dates, but these must be stated with qualifications. Geogre 01:13, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Virginia City, Nevada

message: Is it worth noting that the "Virginia City" set of Bonanza was located near Lake Tahoe but miles from the actual Virginia City & bears only a very slight resemblance to it?
Rlquall 01:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: This statement is so wrong its laughable. The article itself even admits that Virginia City was founded in 1859.
There were plenty of other cities around much older than Virginia City. I'm going to delete this comment. Dr. Morbius 21:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not one of the oldest cities west of the Mississippi 
Talk:Mr. Munchausen

message: Is the argument being made that a person may be originally a "Mr" and then created baron, or originally a "Mr" and inherit the title or Baron as thus "move up," or be a baron and then stripped of the title and "move down" to "Mr"?  I'd agree with that possibility.  --Daniel C. Boyer 15:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. The countradiction would be in the expression "Mr. Baron M". This rather silly bickering here is a problem of OR in the nutshell. Any judgements must be attributed. `'Míkka 17:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fail to see how OR is a question here.  The above is exactly my point.  --Daniel C. Boyer 17:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OR was your addition to the article: you drew conclusions by yourself, rather than took them from a source. Sometimes it works, sometimes don't.  `'Míkka 19:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What conclusions?  --Daniel C. Boyer 17:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mr.
Talk:Somali cat

message: Just a question; the Rarity tab seems unnecessary to me. There hasn't been any information under it and recently, a bot added a warning banner for it. Not any other cat wiki pages have a similar heading that i could find, nor can I find any information to include under that heading. Would anyone mind if I deleted the heading entirely? Littlelibrary (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have this cat encyclopedia and I was wonderng whether in this article there should be something about how the Somali was actually "created". Like who first entered one in a show. I know this info from the book I have so I can type it up (not copying exactly, of course, because that would be copyvio). Melon247 (talk) 18:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestory? 

message: I removed the two broken links and the outdated one. Risssa (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken links 

message: This should be an encyclopedia entry with general information about Somalis -- not a place to list or debate all the acceptable show standards and colors. I have added a link to the Cat Fanciers Association breed profile page for "Somali" and one to the International Cat Association. Risssa (talk) 04:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedia entry v. show standards 
Talk:Waffen-SS order of battle

message: I split out the text descriptions as stubs for the per-division articles that did not already exist, and merged the remaining bullet-list to List of German divisions in WWII, where there is a separate section for the SS OB, to save redundant maintenance. However, if anyone was intending to cover smaller units here as well they should feel free to revert this back, since the list of divisions page will not provide a place for them. — B.Bryant 02:58, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Martin Luther College

message: *I hope to add information to this page as time allows. - Unsigned User
*Added a bit of info. I've been working on adding info on items related to the WELS. May come back and expand historical background when I have more time, unless someone beats me to it. --Lendorien 10:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there four or five dorms. Because in the building count, it says there are 5, but in the description of the dorms and who lives in each, there are 4. Jed 20012 (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Dorms 

message: Hi, this is in reply to your note at WikiProject Minnesota. I am comfortable with raising this to B class which is as high as we can go without impartial review. Article appears fully cited. Narrative flows. I think you carried what is an odd mix of Wisconsin and Minnesota very well. Two questions:
1) Can this explain the different treatment of men and women?
2) Can it briefly describe Martin Luther? (I had to look up Doctor of Theology to figure out the Dr. honorific.) Maybe just expand the caption on the statue? 
Comments:
* I'm not familiar with the Special:FilePath/ construct, but the photo of the Christmas concert ought to just link to the commons instead.
* The History section is too exhaustive. It seems to be more than half the article. Now Yale is also way too long. But Harvard seems to have theirs in check. Maybe you can tighten that up.
* I don't like the term "premier" soccer field. Please either explain what it is or drop the adjective. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment 

message: Article seems to omit the fate of the Watertown, WI campus. Is it still part of MLC? 173.186.12.132 (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Luther Preparatory School continues to use the Watertown campus. I've edited the article to clarify this. Indyguy (talk) 00:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate of Northwestern College campus
Talk:Koppa (disambiguation)

message: Should Koppa (Cyrillic) move to Koppa? I think the people who wants to search Qoppa won't go to Koppa. Furthermore, the article Ksi and the article Xi needs no disambiguation page. --Hello World! 03:17, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved as requested. --Scott Davis Talk 12:55, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of Major League Baseball attendance records

message: * Shouldn't we include the playoffs here?  The Marlins drew over 60,000 fans a game in the 2003 playoffs. --Idont Havaname 03:18, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Playoff attendance

message: *I don't blame the person who did it, but I was like the first to update for this year's Cubs attendance and it was undid a day or two later because the Cubs home season was over but they still had six road games, but next time it looks like there are some premature stats, check the MLB schedule.Cedargang (talk) 23:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Early" Stats 

message: Where does these numbers come from? Most of them don't make sense at all. How can the average be even higher than the maximum capacity of the ballpark?  
Check this link for a more realistic summary. --116.118.88.93 (talk) 10:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per Game Average 

message: Nothing about lowest attendence? The A’s’ 653 in 1979? Some Guy on Twitter counting 347 heads at a Marlins game? —Wiki Wikardo 21:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record lows 

message: Seriously? 2008 was Yankee Stadium II, as the remodel was known. NYY left Washington Heights for th Polo Grounds in 1913 and Yankee I in 1922. 2601:2C6:4300:B8C0:A1B9:C2BC:AD44:D186 (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HILLTOP PARK
Talk:Albert Günther

message: The French version seems to be a lot more informative. Could someone who knows French and English help. Shyamal 03:22, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a french contributor and I have not found the biological talk ! I have first write this message on Polbot talk page but it seems that the editor have leaved wikipedia. So, please, copy these lines into the right page. Thanks a lot.
On the Cophixalus balbus article we can read that the author is Albert C. L. G. Günther, however this one is died in 1914 and this specie was described... 89 years later ! In fact the author is Rainer Günther, born in 1941. Please could you make the correction on your bot... Thanks a lot. french user Givet. 81.48.252.34 (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Günther & Günther
Talk:West Memphis Three

message: The article should be updated to acknowledge the recent claim that the lost evidence has been found at the West Memphis Police Department.https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/587211-evidence-believed-to-be-lost-in-west-memphis-3-case-reportedly-found-athttps://www.thebharatexpressnews.com/evidence-lost-in-west-memphis-three-cases-found-in-police-department/https://www.crimeonline.com/2021/12/23/west-memphis-three-damien-echols-lawyer-finds-lost-evidence-in-case-of-three-murdered-boys/https://www.thv11.com/article/news/crime/lawyers-testing-new-west-memphis-three-evidence/91-ef62e346-5b9c-4347-a864-e7c14249007ehttps://www.wreg.com/news/local/west-memphis-police-chief-resigns-mayor-speaks-out/https://www.localmemphis.com/video/news/local/damien-echols-says-police-chiefs-resignation-is-related-to-west-memphis-three-case/522-887f369e-8100-44e1-b15b-75a3647f9c1ehttps://www.fox13memphis.com/news/local/damien-echols-legal-team-reviews-lost-evidence-1993-west-memphis-murder-case/GEP3YWZYL5CE7G67MX62FYDYOA/
--WERcndwsk12 (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost Evidence Found 

message: Just curious why this wiki shows the clearly defined and individualized images of the ‘assailants’ yet no images of the victims connected to their bios.  
#shamefulwikipedia
2001:56A:7DAA:F500:C164:67DF:2BA6:3EC2 (talk) 09:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia can only display images that are not copyrighted, or otherwise permitted to be published here, per an image use policy. Do you have any such images? —ADavidB 13:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreal
Talk:Battle of Château-Thierry (1918)

message: either this is ripped from encarta, or encarta ripped from here. Either way...
Why is the title hyphenated? The place name is not hyphenated. older ≠ wiser 17:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No heading

message: An anonymous contributor had changed the two date reference in the text from 1918-07-18 to 1918-06-03. I've reverted both, but i'm a little dubious. 
The counter offensive (second paragraph) was in fact launched on the 18th of July. But, as said previously here, there were two battles : on 1918-06-03, the AEF and the french marine infantry stopped the german army, but Château-Thierry was lost for the allies. If you look at the city today, only Hill 204 and the south bank of Marne river were not taken. This part is not often remembered, as it's not a victory. On the other hand, the offensive of 1918-07-18 was a victory, and is still cited...
So my question is : shouldn't we change the introduction sentence to something like : 
*The Battle of Château-Thierry was fought from June 3 to July 18, 1918 and was one of the first actions the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) under General John J. "Black Jack" Pershing. It was a battle in World War I at first part of the stopping of the german advance in spring 1918, then part of the Second Battle of the Marne, initially prompted by a German offensive launched on July 15 against the newest troops on the front, the AEF (American Expeditionary Force).
I'm no historian, just a native from C-T... Zeugma fr (talk) 11:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This has just come again, with another IP editor changing the dates of the intro to June. The sole source which is cited for this article refers on to the battle of July 18. May I suggest we look for more sources and the possibly expand the article if we want to cover all the events of June - July 1918 for this area? On the other hand, there is an article on the Second Battle of the Marne, the larger conflict of which this article's subject was a part. Geoff Who, me?  21:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd of June or 18th of July ? 
Talk:Maschinen Krieger ZbV 3000

message: Is there a need to explain, that "Strahl" could also mean "ray"?  79.218.11.141 (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German term "Strahl" 

message: There was a movie produced in the 80's I believe. It was called "S.F.3.D Original Video - Nut Rocker". Info is scarce about it though.--151.213.69.165 (talk) 04:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ma. K. Movie 