Talk:North County Transit District

message: :Image:NCTD Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NCTD Logo.jpg

message: "When the Sprinter is fully operational the citizens of the San Diego County area will find out that they have spent over $750,000,000."
The tone of this sentence is not appropriate for Wikipedia - and the dollar amount, $750 million, is highly suspect. Change or deletion is needed. Ldemery (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate tone, uncited questionable fact. 

message: The image :File:Compass Card.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Compass Card.jpg

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: "In 2011, an artist surreptitiously installed a mosaic on the wall of a COASTER bridge near the Encinitas station that came to be known as "Surfing Madonna". In early 2012, the Encinitas City Council voted to accept the mosaic under a long-term loan agreement and to support a proposal to put the mosaic on publicly owned land near Moonlight Beach."
This summary of the story glosses over the fact that the mosaic was ordered to be removed, and the artist had to pay $6500 over it. Current summary makes it appear that the city council kindly accepted a guerilla gift rather than force its removal until a major campaign helped bring it back. Enstars69 (talk) 05:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission of important details in  "In popular culture"