lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2006 Liberal Democrats deputy leadership election

message: Please find a reference for who the 'likely candidates' will be.
Paulleake 12:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I presume that three MPs didn't transfer from Heath at all - is this so, or are the figures misreported?
And anyone know why? Lib Dems are normally good at making full use of their transfers. Timrollpickering 20:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's particularly notable because of Cable winning by just two, of course. But it's likely those three really didn't have a preference after Heath. —Whouk (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three non transfers?
Talk:Islamic comparative religion

message: The Wikipedia guideline makes it abundantly clear: "Do not use subpages for permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." A subpage of an article that is itself a stub looks particularly strange. Pecher Talk 13:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subpages

message: As this article has no content that isn't origional research, I usggest redirecting this article to Islam and other religions. This article already covers what is mentioned here as it is.--Sefringle 23:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to redirect to [[Islam and other religions]]
Talk:Edyta Bartosiewicz

message: I took the liberty of rewriting this article. I think it looks much better now, and provides much more information. Any comments and productive critisism welcome.
XAVeRY 12:39, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  new article 
Talk:Sheree Murphy

message: Whoever wrote this does not have a clue - you have not even got her birthday right - yet you claim to know her so well -DO YOUR RESEARCH.  And as for a wealthy family her Mother grew up in care and her Dad was from a poor Irish family.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.74.49 (talk) 01:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article suggests that the actor didn't work professionally again, until her role in Emmerdale. Elsewhere in the article, it states that she was in The Bill and Only Fools and Horses. Have I misread this? 2A00:23C6:4198:5C01:5260:83E6:3B6C:49AE (talk) 01:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory content.
Talk:Rifles for Watie

message: Er, why do the usage of the words "negro" and "Indian" make the book racist?  "Nigger" I can understand, though it was not (I don't think) used by the author, but rather by soldiers shown in a negative light.  "Negro" and "Indian" were acceptable in those times, without suggesting racism. --Narfil Palùrfalas 20:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The words "negro" and "indian" 

message: The major spoilers in the list of characters need to be removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmacfar (talk • contribs) 12:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 

message: This article contains numerous factual errors about the book as well as spoilers with no spoiler alerts.Beetfarm Louie (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desperately needs rewriting 

message: — Assignment last updated by Fursheep98 (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250HV10
Talk:Cello Sonata (Barber)

message: This article has greatly enlightened me! I always thought there were four movements - until now! I am recommending this for featured article status.
Sorry. I get too excited sometimes.
Rintrah 13:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Template talk:India topics

message: We should include more south Indian history. I don't know which articles are the important ones. Vijayanagara has to be one of them I think. deeptrivia (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I don't know whether you think the same thing or not, but I feel that the title of this article should be "India" ONLY and not India topics.
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I have reverted BJP colour scheme. To have a colour scheme of a single party in india template is blatant pov pushing.--Sodabottle (talk) 17:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, I didn't notice this but now that you point it out, it's actually subtle rather than blatant. I don't have a preference about the color but if there is a way to rotate colors, we should do that. Zuggernaut (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Colours

message: I don't know whether you think the same thing or not, but I feel that the title of this article should be "India" ONLY and not India topics.
I say:
Yah isn’t the topic India?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.0.224.200 (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 May 2014
Talk:Tamara Volskaya

message: This is an advertising or newspaper promotion piece, not an encyclopedia article. I also suspect it was a copyright violation and published somewhere else. I am rewriting the basic facts in a skeleton of a new article. It could use some basic life info such as birth date and place, and year of emigration to US. More info would be useful but please do not re-insert the opinions and puffery. Thanks. Dalembert 13:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: original article and reasons for removal
Talk:SMG (property management)

message: I created this article. Sounds like a big company, so I'm surprised the article didn't already exist.
The second sentence is a copyvio from their website. Not being a business major, I'm not exactly sure what a general partnership is, so can someone who knows a little more please rewrite it? More info on the history is sorely needed, too.
The list of managed properties is copied from several sections of their site. I do not consider it a copyvio as it is just a list of properties and cities. Maybe it is, or maybe it isn't but it's not appropriate for the article. I vote that it is, as it shows just how much of a reach they have. Wiki links to each of the properties would probably be a good idea (and also to each city and state). Unfortunately, that is going to be a time-consuming project. I wonder if a bot could pick up on this article and search for matching articles to link to. The reverse may be useful as well: on each of the properties' articles, put a note that it is managed by SMG (like I did with the Sullivan Arena article).
The stuff is out there--now, I'll wait for it to be mercilessly edited. :-)
cluth 13:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created article 

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
* Support per my own nomination. :) Croctotheface 08:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Anyone know what the letters stand for? It would be good to put that in. I couldn't find anything on Google. 66.91.36.8 (talk) 01:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you look directly above at the move request? oknazevad (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMG
Talk:Terry Fox Secondary School

message: I've updated the Infobox_Education_in_Canada template, so I had to retrofit the older information from this article into the new template format. If someone can verify the accuracy of the information, it would be greatly appreciated. --Stephane Charette 13:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Template Format 

message: In regards to this quote added to the article today by anonymous IP user :
 Not known for Academics it has nevertheless produced many skilled athletes.
While it may not exactly violate NPOV, it isn't worded perfectly neutral either.  I think a list of past graduate athletes combined with a bit of re-wording could help the article. --Stephane Charette 23:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV about athletes versus academics? 

message: I'm looking for some verification of the actual date the school was named. The school website states it was named January 18, 1986, but I would have bet money that the name wasn't changed until AFTER the class of 87 graduated, and that the class of 88 were the first grads from Terry Fox Senior Secondary. Lainyg 19:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date school was named 

message: Just made some minor changes to these two sections. I plugged the information into a table setting rather than the list form it was in before.  I just joined Wikipedia today so I thought my first contributions to this site would go to the high school I gradded from.  Ciao for now. MarcusCyganiak (talk) 21:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provincial Championships & Terry Fox Alumni 

message: No such name exists -- or has ever existed.
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/index.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.145.186 (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Columnist 
Talk:Mitchella repens

message: The flora says the stems root at the nodes, not at the internodes, on the cited page. Please quote otherwise, because I can't find it. The trait would be unusual enoug to be cited in more than one 100-y-o source, if accurate.97.215.178.177 (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the text, the article originally had internodes.  There are also adjustment needed with the flower description, which says that the paired flowers are different from each other, while a source I found says the flowers are diffrent on diffrent plants. Hardyplants (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This wikipedia article is just poorly written. Both of the sources used for citations within this article call the plant distylous, meaning dimorphic heterostyly, a common strategy in the Rubiaceae. The 2 different flower morphs are found on different plants, and this is what the citations used for this article say. Whoever is writing the article is not reading the citations correctly or does not understand them. I cannot edit the article on this device, though, as it won't feed edit sections, but the whole article. 97.215.178.177 (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adventitious roots 

message: The fourth sentence of the third paragraph under "Description" states that "The fruit is a drupe containing up to eight seeds."  The problem is that drupes are characterized as fruits containing one stone, and each stone generally contains one seed.  I don't see that there is a reference to back up the claim that it is a drupe.  This line should be corrected.  I would correct it, but I don't know what type of fruit it actually is.  --YoDeeKu (talk) 04:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fruit Type:
Talk:Desoldering

message: I would like to add some information about desoldering techniques. Do yall think it would be ok to throw it up on the main section for desoldering?
:Be bold and add it.  Pictures are especially welcome, and good references.  You're encoraged to get a WIkipedia user ID at sign-on, this makes it easier to track your contributions. --Wtshymanski 15:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first paragraph distinguishes this device from a desoldering bulb, but the link for desoldering bulb just redirects back here.Salvar (talk) 00:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Without any comment to the difference between the two, I've removed the circular link to desoldering bulb in this article. – Zedla (talk) 01:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was really wondering what exactly a desoldering bulb is and how it works. It would be lovely if someone who knows could add a few words (if not an article) about it. -- megA (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Desoldering Bulb

message: Really stupid question I'm sure, but once the solder's been sucked off the board, where does it go? Is there like a resiviour of solder inside the solder sucker that needs to be emptied, or something? Scaeme (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can remove the tip and clean the flakes out periodically. Gigs (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does the solder go afterwards?

message: http://cdn.sparkfun.com/datasheets/Tools/SOLDERING%20WICK.pdf
Ingredient: Rosin, Copper 
Chemical Name:  Abietic acid, Copper 
Content: < 5%, > 95% 
Chemical formula: C20H30O2, Cu
"rosin with content of 0.1% may cause an allergic reaction"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.72.247.113 (talk) 14:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health hazards 

message: what a classification of desoldering tool? 2001:4453:570:5D00:C8B5:B68E:6AD4:43AF (talk) 11:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electronics T.L.E
Talk:List of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay publications

message: I think the cross-over Chaos books should be included in the first edition biblio list, as they are perhaps the most coveted of all first series books due to the difficulty in finding/identifying them.  I'd post the details, but, unfortunately that was what I was hoping to find here.
:duly added. --Clay Collier 00:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's an appropriate tag to indicate that the current publishing schedule is very much in flux (with Thousand Thrones up in the air)? CapnZapp (talk) 11:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Fantasy Flight Games deal 

message: First, Thousand Thrones were BI's last book. (I have a copy myself, which clearly marks it as a BI and not a FFG book). I have thus added it under a BI 2008 heading. That doesn't mean the same entry under FFG is wrong - I simply do not know. But it should probably be indicated to be a reprint. Which brings me to my question:
Haven't FFG started reprinting some books (other than Thousand Thrones)? If so, they should probably be entered on this page? Anyone with a more completist streak than me...? Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FFG reprints
Talk:Very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line 2

message: It seems that TDC in Denmark have stopped selling VDSL2 as a product at the moment.
---  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.185.3.27 (talk) 14:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See the following link from the External Links section: Migrating to VDSL2 09:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Alas, this has become a collection of statements written in present and future tense, not appropriate for wikipedia. Generally we should only describe things that happened in the past, and give the date. For example, in 2011 blah offered the VDSL service. Otherwise it gets out of date if you say "currently" and someone reads it five years later. And it might have been "most advanced" in 2006, but some day there might be another one, for example.  W Nowicki (talk) 00:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Avoide dated statements

message: Feel free to add an VDSL2 column to the OFDM#OFDM system comparison table. Mange01 12:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OFDM system comparison table 

message: Direct TV doesn't intend to use VDSL2 to deliver to individual units, does it?  That part of the section doesn't make sense and it reads like an advertisement.  --SilverhandTalk 15:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct TV under the North America Header 

message: add ITU-T G.vector (G.993.5) (Vectoring), if it belongs here. Probably this belongs to Dynamic Spectrum Management (DSM) level 3?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Spectrum_Management.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.21.107.18 (talk) 22:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vectoring 

message: This article has become a massive list of VDSL deployment statuses in various countries.
Isn't it more appropriate to move this list to another page, and focus here only on technical factors?
Juma93 (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Split carried out. See discussion at  Conquerist (talk) 14:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of VDSL deployment 

message: Profile table shows max. downstream throughput (such as 50Mbps for 8a thru 200 for 30a), but whole column appears to be taken from what ITU-T G.993.2 , ITU-T G.993.2 lists as: "Required minimum bidirectional net data rate capability (MBDC)" (something quite different): therefore article is misleading and inaccurate. Earlier article gives a theoretical maximum of 250Mbps, but this profile table lists only up to 200Mbps: article is contradictory, both cannot be true. Brook13wk (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max. downstream throughput
Talk:Light railway

message: The article contains the assertion that Light Railways were "built or operated in the United Kingdom under the 1896 Light Railways Act". The first Parliamentary recognition of the concept was the Railway Construction Facilities Act of 1864 (see page 8 of Messenger, The Culm Valley Light Railway for example). There are many other aspects of the phraseology of the UK part of this article that seem to be not encyclopaedic. Afterbrunel (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK first authorisation 

message: The article currently states: > The Heart of Wales Line [...] appears to be the only part of the National Rail [...] system run as a light railway except for the DLR (Docklands Light Railway). <
This needs unpacking and re-writing, because
# The DLR is not part of the National Rail system.
# The DLR (despite its name) is not AFAIK run as a light railway in the same way as the Heart of Wales line is (i.e. subject to an Order made under the 1896 Act).  
Will, however, wait a while to see if anyone has anything further to add before I make any changes. -- Picapica (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks -- Picapica (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK: Docklands Light Railway
Talk:Death Gate

message: I loved the books when I read them, but never got to play the game.
Anyone has any idea if I can find it somewhere? unsigned.
::http://www.google.com/search?q=death+gate+game also, this article has a lot of short sentences and needs a bit of cleanup. Rihk 01:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Story section currently reads almost like a mini-walkthrough for the game. Is it really necessary to go into that much detail? At the very least, there should be a spoiler warning at the beginning. 62.78.230.2 (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much detail 

message: This game disappeared from GOG sometime before March 20. It can't have been on the site for more than two and a half months. I'm unable to find any information on why it was removed but was able to find a post from a GOG employee confirming that they "had to" remove it from their catalog sometime on or before that date. 50.72.9.214 (talk) 20:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer on GOG
Talk:Sawgrass Mills

message: The old books-a-million is closed for a new anchor. Change it.--99 time 14:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books-A-Million relocation 

message: According to the article, it states that it's the second largest mall in florida and the sixth largest in the nation, however the list of largest malls doesn't state any malls in florida before this one.  How is largest being defined or is this a mistake?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.8.83.246 (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second-largest in Florida? How? 

message: The cinema is listed as an "anchor store" which doesn't make sense in the context of that type of business.  Maybe just change the word "store" to "tenant" - ie. "The anchor tenants are...".  24.51.192.49 (talk) 03:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchor stores 

message: "Largest" is used a bunch of times in the lede without any qualification.  Largest by what, specifically?  Aventura is "larger" by the number of stores, but Sawgrass is larger by area, etc.  24.51.192.49 (talk) 23:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largest mall"
Talk:Gatwick airport transit

message: Okay. Much of this is plain silly and needs to be changed.
===Construction date===
It "...connects the two terminals of London Gatwick Airport (north and south) together. It was constructed at the same time as the south terminal."
Given that the South Terminal is the oldest terminal, when it was built what did it connect the South Terminal to? The fresh air ? The blank space that the North Terminal was going to fit into ?
Get real!!!
===Proper monorail=== 
What is a "proper monorail"? This is unencyclopaedic language. What are we trying to say ?
===Second Runway===
So if another runway and terminal are built, surely the train will continue to run between the North and South terminals? In that case it will not be "redundant".
===Spectacular views===
How do we know that "It is one of the most spectacular monorails in Europe." ?
Overall I think at least 1/2 of this article should go, and if it does then perhaps the remainder should be merged back into the Gatwick Airport article?
What say you all ?
===Rewrite===
I have rewritten this page to try and make sense, other than the name most of what was written was not true !! (It is not a monorail). I have removed the reference to Bombardier as the vehicle makers unless somebody can cite the source. This page is now so small it could merged back it into the Gatwick Page MilborneOne 21:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Having tweaked the Gatwick Airport page I would say this page is not needed, I also think there was some confusion because gatwick did have a monorail transit system between the main south terminal building and the satellite pier 3 (since removed).MilborneOne 22:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References and sources

message: I have rewritten this page to try and make sense, other than the name most of what was written was not true !! (It is not a monorail). I have removed the reference to Bombardier as the vehicle makers unless somebody can cite the source. This page is now so small it could merged back it into the Gatwick Page MilborneOne 21:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Having tweaked the Gatwick Airport page I would say this page is not needed, I also think there was some confusion because gatwick did have a monorail transit system between the main south terminal building and the satellite pier 3 (since removed).MilborneOne 22:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Ellsworth, Maine

message: These peopleare using this page and, I presume, other Wikipedia articles as filler content to attract traffic, raise their Google pagerank, and eventually sucker people into loans, if it's not a scam in the first place. They're also hotlinking the Wikimedia images- I'm no expert but the commercial use seems like a pretty clear violation.
Is there something that can be done about this?
Muncadunc (talk) 15:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ephraim Williams

message: any ideas whether it's pronounced eph-ray-im or ephr-raim (two syllables or three?) User:68.40.202.5 11:04, 5 March 2006 (Rgoodermote added signature as BOT has failed to)
:At Williams we were taught that the pronunciation was EEF-rum.  No idea if that's simply the modern interpretation, or if that was truly the way he pronounced it.  I know in the original hebrew it would have been ef-RA-yim.  Chuck (talk) 01:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Horton Plaza

message: This article seems like it's a bit of an advert. Should we edit it to make it more unbiased?
:Good idea. Be bold and do it. -Will Beback 22:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christopher Berry

message: In case anyone is wondering, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1177875/
I reverted the edit regarding the frisbee player, as a google search finds this person to be virtually unknown.  An article created about him would almost certainly, I think, have been deleted, while the actor is definitely notable and an article on him would be appropriate.
Which means that the only way the frisbee player could be mention, I think, is to actually write an article about the actor, rather than just my lazy redirect, and then briefly mention the existence of the frisbee player in it.  --Xyzzyplugh 15:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)