Talk:Zero instruction set computer

message: A lot of the text on this page is directly cribbed from the first link http://www.lsmarketing.com/LSMFiles/9809-ai1.htm
The link is given, but the text is not attributed. It should be rewritten. Heck, it should be rewritten anyways; it's barely intelligible.
Dyfrgi 18:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The IBM patent lists the first person to apply for a patent and who one. If an inventor is international or doesn't believe their invention has any value (as would be the case if they simply wrote a theoretical treatise and did not ever plan on having it implemented), then the first patent holder would not be the inventor. There are papers as early as 1989 published in france describing the architecture of neural networking chips, per ieee, and the current source cited makes no claims of invention. As such, I don't believe there are any reliable sources for who invented the ZISC architecture, at this time. Eaterjolly (talk) 04:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an earlier paper I found. That paper also cites the following in it's references from a 1986 paper "D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing (PDP): Exploration in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 1, 1986, MIT Press." So Rumelhart would be the closest thing to an inventor we have, not that we have a source to confirm that for us. Eaterjolly (talk) 05:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Zero instruction set computer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140512231957/http://general-vision.com/zisc/ to http://general-vision.com/zisc/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110612203600/http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5621863.html to http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5621863.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060527023259/http://www.aboutai.net:80/DesktopDefault.aspx?article=aa071800a.htm&tabid=2 to http://www.aboutai.net/DesktopDefault.aspx?article=aa071800a.htm&tabid=2
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140508024940/http://general-vision.com/cm1k/ to http://www.general-vision.com/cm1k/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:eioYQ1GtXLoJ:scholar.google.com/+zisc&hl=en&as_sdt=0,36&as_yhi=1994 Royal Institute of Technology | Department of Physics - Frescati, Stockholm, Sweden Eaterjolly (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially Useful Sources 

message: In September 2014, an open-source accelerator card based on an array of CM1K chips connected to an FPGA, was demonstrated and used to accelerate the calculation of large arrays of linear regressions. In particular, the generation of high-resolution brain connectivity maps was demonstrated using Resting state fMRI time-series, the correlation between which was approximated through a measure based on the L1-norm.  ( Lminati (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This would need a secondary source. - MrOllie (talk) 21:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed addition 

message: Just about everything in this article that extends the article past stub class is problematic. I couldn't find a clear enough sentence or paragraph to bother copying into my own notes. And I don't feel like I comprehended anything, either. 
I'm trying to be realistic in my assessment here, but it's hard to see anything here that isn't an RfD in slow motion. Mine is just one opinion, but as I see it, this article really needs to become more clear in some tangible way to justify its continued existence. — MaxEnt 04:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub-class plus problems