Talk:AnyDVD

message: Anyone know the legality of this program in the US?
Generally any program that Circumvents a Technological Protection Measure will violate the DMCA.  See "The DMCA's Anti-Circumvention Provisions and Removal of Copyright," § 14:7.1 of the Practising Law Institute's Treatis on Copyright Law.  --Cooleymd 21:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The same principle applies to the US (known as 'fair use rights').  However, the current situation is that since it is illegal under the DCMA to possess a tool designed to circumvent digital copyright controls, it thus becomes illegal to copy such a protected disc, even if it is for your own use.  Also, of course, although the Americans might like to believe otherwise, the DCMA does not apply in Canada (or anywhere else outside America).  Canada, may enact (or have enacted) their own legislation on the subject. 109.153.242.10 (talk) 18:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Legality? 

message: :Image:Anydvd logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are actually not using our AnyDVD logo, but our SlySoft logo. Usage of both logos for documentary purposes is fine with us. However, if you are in doubt whether "fair use" rights are granted, please ask for explicit permission. 209.59.100.2 (talk) 02:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Anydvd logo.PNG

message: Well, I ask you guys: is this fair? Or what differences are there which made AnyDVD not as vulnerable as DVD Decrypter? Probably because they can sue a private person more efficiently than a company? -andy 85.176.254.201 (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the difference, that makes the different situation, is, that Slysoft is no legal person in the USA, but as company a legal person in Antigua and Barbuda, which is a country, that has no relationship to US or european law since its liberation from the british empire in 1981. If somebody wants to sue Slysoft for developing AnyDVD, he has to sue Slysoft in Antigua and Barbuda, but decrypting DRM is not illegal in Antigua and Barbuda, so the mafia of media companies has, as of yet, no chance to destroy this tool, that is much needed for every buyer of DVDs who doesn't like the possibility of loss due to broken DVDs. --88.73.137.6 (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing! Developer of [[DVD Decrypter]] got a cease-and-desist letter in 2005, but this one still lives on to this day! 

message: Hai gais!! Sorry I rather suck at using Wiki but I have worthwhile news.
Any DVD is dropping the free updates model and forcing you to buy new every year, they are currently running a promotion to get people to buy unlimited update license right now and that promo has been extend.
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/16484.cfm  
I can't find the article at this time but some time ago they switched to the euro, at a current price of 49 that's almost 100 USD, when befor it was closer to 50$.
Thats all I have for now sorry I can't compute army time well so I tossed in standard time 0-o, sorry for the mess. 
 --Zippydsmlee 7:50am-est, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
:You can still buy life free update, apparently they got too many angry email and turn their back to this kind of business model. -Jertonit (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not even be sure they really ever intended to change the price. It is a known advertising strategy to call something a "short term offer", maybe even with limited availability of the product to that conditions. That however does not mean it would be actually limited in time or in amount. This alleged scarcity however should make the customers buy more and buy faster that way stimulating business. --87.123.9.196 (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yearly updates and Price hike. 

message: since August, some random IP user added the line "it will not work in VHS" ... just saying...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.161.184.35 (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note! Meanwhile, this info got removed again, which is correct. I especially looked up VHS (disambiguation) to check, but the only possible meaning for VHS in this context really is the one of Video Home System, the system, which was used widely in the 1990ies. Sure AnyDVD does not copy VHS tapes, same as it also does not copy Super 8 movies and other older technologies. --87.123.9.196 (talk) 12:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  VHS?