lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cambridge, Gloucestershire

message: I've read before this claim that "cam" in this case should rhyme with "ham" rather than with "came" ... but I grew up a few miles away and I've never heard anyone actually pronounce it that way. Is it in fact correct?
--JennyRad 18:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I disagree that the Cam and Cambridge should be merged - they are distinct villages, although should obviously be linked since they lie in the same parish. 
Briommeb, 13.59, 20 Jul 2006
:I also disagree that the Cam and Cambridge article should be merged for the reasons given Saga City 13:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is bizarre that when I type Cam into the Search box I get Cambridge! They are two unconnected villages, a few miles apart - with nothing in common except the first three letters of their name. The text is about Cambridge but the pictures are of Cam! The entry for Cam will have to be returned if Wikipedia is not to look amateur on this matter - Adrian Pingstone 12:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Furthermore, Cambridge is quite a lot smaller than Cam and falls within Cam parish. If anything, Cambridge should have been merged into Cam, rather than the other way round. I see someone has now recreated a stub on Cam; I think I'll restore the old version. --Blisco 23:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cam is not Cambridge 

message: Something badly wrong here!! Have a look at Cam, Gloucestershire where much of the wording is identical. I live nearby and I know that the two villages are entirely separate, they just share a vaguely similar name - Adrian Pingstone 09:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be (partly) my fault. The two articles were merged last October; however, the merge was done the wrong way round, with Cam being merged into Cambridge, when Cam is clearly the larger and more significant place. (I suppose association with the more famous Cambridge might have caused a bit of confusion here.) I restored the artice on Cam last night, but forgot to move the relevant passage out of this article - Cambridge clearly doesn't have 8,500 residents! I'll see to it now. --Blisco 11:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - Adrian Pingstone 14:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:Malacostraca

message: I have uplaoded a series of phylogenetic trees 
I have a brief introduction to the phylogeny but I cannot use it as yet. --Squidonius (talk) 12:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny 

message: Why does it say "Neo-Latin" in the lead when it's really only Greek? —Snoteleks (Talk) 18:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Apple Monitor II

message: I came here to look up the connector type for an Apple monitor, as we are trying to get one in working order again. The Apple /// monitor article says the connector type, but this article does not. ClintJCL (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Monitor had a single cinch (RCA) connector for baseband composite (actually monochrome) video. -- 194.39.218.10 (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text states: "The Monitor II was designed for the Apple II+". Is this correct even though the article also says it was introduced in 1984, well after the II+ had been discontinued and replaced by the first IIe model? -- 194.39.218.10 (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "designed for the Apple II+" even though it was release after the Apple IIe? 

message: Deleted manual link had copyright date of 1982, InfoWorld article posts Apple announcement in August 1983.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.151.14.236 (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed introduction date to 1983 

message: does anyone know what the native resolution of this monitor is? Cause it would be useful. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually to be fair, it isn't really that necessary. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution
Talk:Apple Monitor III

message: Does anyone know what the resolution of this monitor is? Cause it would definitely be useful. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 18:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Monitor III manual I just added states "700 TV lines center, 300 TV lines corners", and even after reading Television lines I still don't know what it means. DFlhb (talk) 15:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: alright, well it isn't that important. I was just curious. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

text: That means, that it wasn't as sharp in the corners as in the center of the screen. The electron beam hit's the screen on an angle which drops sharpness. 57.133.65.178 (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution
Talk:Branchiopoda

message: this article needs some kind of citations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Music2177 (talk • contribs) 23:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs citations 

message: I'm certainly no expert so I'm not going to edit the article myself (perhaps I'm misreading it?), but the opening paragraph reads "They are mostly small, freshwater animals that feed on plankton and detritus, with the exception of the Cladocera, many of which are marine." Later in the same article is written "[Cladocera] are ubiquitous in inland aquatic habitats, but rare in the oceans." Many of them are marine and yet rare in the oceans? The actual article for Cladocera states that only 8 species are actually neritic, which doesn't seem like many at all compared to the hundred of other species in the order.
211.6.122.18 (talk) 06:29, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction Regarding Cladocera
Talk:Basilisk II

message: The last version on the homepage is a 0.91 from 2001. So where is the "1.0 R5" version from 2006 that is claimed to exist in this article? Please give a page for that one, or change the "last version" info to the one on the homepage. -- 92.229.69.168 (talk) 05:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that refers to this build of the emulator.  There are also builds from 2010 over here.  These could all be called "unofficial" releases.  The entry here probably should read 0.91. Watchsmart (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the latest version "1.0 R5" correct? Where is it? 

message: Basilisk II ChangeLog  lists 23.Jan.1999 as a first alpha release and V0.7 (release 0.7-2) - 6.Oct.1999 as a first non-alpha release. However Amiga Review mentions March 1999 release as a first release date and there is no older news about Basilisk II than March 1999 on amiga-news.de. Apparently, there was also a previous open source emulator for BeOS and UNIX called "Basilisk" from the same author. Pavlor (talk) 13:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First release date
Talk:Clutter

message: I was trying to look for pictures of the actual Clutter Family Murder...if anyone could help me out that would be good!
Measuring Clutter linkdump. Shinobu 21:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably better to go to some sort of professional, they will be able to prescribe something suitable  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.1.34 (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:BBEdit

message: i dont think the concept was to replace TeachText but rather the Borland Think Pascal editor, which Rich Siegel was working on at the time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by A plague of rainbows (talk • contribs) 21:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  origins as proof of concept 

message: I deleted this sentence that was in the first paragraph:
BBEdit is marketed under the trademark slogan, "It doesn't suck."
Why should an encyclopedia care what a product's marketing slogans are? It makes the whole thing feel like an advertisement. Unless it's an article about marketing, or a product that might not be recognized without a famous slogan... but neither of those appears to be the case here.
:While I get this argument, I think "it makes the whole thing feel like an advertisement" is, well, a bit of an overstatement. I'm not sure that including some reference to their rather whimsical marketing slogan -- which has been part of their brand identity for at least two decades -- should be forbidden. I mean, maybe we can stick it in a sidebar box or something. ChipotleCoyote (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted marketing slogan 

message: The article's infobox notes that BBEdit is written in Carbon, but BBEdit 12's release notes say "BBEdit is now built as a 64-bit application," and there is rather (in)famously no 64-bit version of Carbon -- according to Wikipedia's own article on Carbon, the API isn't even supported in macOS Catalina and above. Unless there are objections I'm going to remove that note. ChipotleCoyote (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carbon vs. Cocoa? 

message: The app icon and screenshot that are shown in the infobox are quite outdated? Could someone please update them? 178.83.233.148 (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures in infobox 

message: Does the inclusion of this really serve as free marketing? I've seen larger companies removed from Wikipedia due to this violation.  Bfrasure (talk • contribs) 22:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free marketing?
Talk:Quantization (sound processing)

message: To whoever might see this:
This page requires a bit of work, both copyedit and checking out the details. I took it from the article on digital sampling, which is about to undergo a change (since this info is about quantization and not about sampling). I hope you can do the rest of the work. Thanks! --Zvika 18:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The reference to the german article is not correct. Currently it points to an article about "MIDI Quantisation" wich is not correct. Maybe the german article's headline is not correct though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.61.200.200 (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to german articel incorrect
Talk:Claris Impact

message: Having worked on the team at Claris that created this software (Instructional Designer), I have first-hand knowledge of the application's name. Here is another reference to the correct name: .
I understand that I have to "move" the page to be able to accomplish renaming it. However, I have not edited 10 topics (only 7), so I evidently can't do this (I can't find the "Move" option anywhere on the ClarisImpact page. I'm petitioning to be "confirmed" so we'll see if that works. Wish me luck… so far everything I"ve tried to accomplish by correcting this mistake has been a hassle. <sigh> Trlloyd60 04:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title should be "ClarisImpact" rather than "Claris Impact."
Talk:Claris Resolve

message: The monochrome screenshot used in the article  is doubtful - it seems to be a 1:1 copy of my screenshot shown on  -> Claris Resolve -> "Vorgucker", direkt link  and just converted from GIF to PNG.
Ghoffart (talk) 16:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  monochrome screenshot is a bit ... doubtful 
Template talk:Infobox U.S. metropolitan area

message: I tried to change the image to display as a thumbnail.  I noticed this because when I was looking at Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex the first image displayed is huge, but should really be displayed as a 200px thumbnail.  Can someone change the template so that this appears correctly? Thanks! -- RedPoptarts 23:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just reverted for the time being to go see the display issue on DFW and didn't see anything wrong.  —RJN 00:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumbnail 

message: Though I know some will disagree I'd like to suggest a couple of things:
# Why do we have to have a template entirely dedicated to US metro areas? Why not make this more generic to apply to any country?
# It seems to me a little dubious to use the the OMB MSA name as the title for the infobox. For one thing could argue legitimately that the MSA name is no more special than the CSA name for a given area (i.e. why not designate the CSA name as the primary name?). Apart from that though the OMB has no particular authority (outside federal statistics gathering) in naming these areas. In the absence of official names (metro areas are not legal entities and therefore have no official names) I would argue that the primary name used should be whatever the chamber of commerce or equivalent organization uses as its primary designation. For example the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce uses Chicagoland as its primary name for the area. This organization arguably speaks for the metro area more than any other so presumably Wikipedia should follow its naming practice. Certainly such practice is more in line with WP:LEAD.
--Mcorazao (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. Food for thought: The OMB principal cities for each MSA/CSA are subject to change from year to year. Though the data in an infobox may need annual updates there is something strange about changing the main title of the infobox just because the OMB changes the principal cities (i.e. this seems very artificial since usually the metro area itself will not generally change how it refers to itself). --Mcorazao (talk) 19:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Four of the five largest U.S. metro areas simply use  instead of this template. I suggest that this template should use that infobox underneath the hood for consistency and simplicity. —Mrwojo (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Reimplement with Infobox settlement
Talk:Frucht Quark

message: Does this article need to be categorised  under "Supermarkets of the United Kingdom"? Penrithguy 18:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Frucht Quark is just German for Fruit Quark (dairy product)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.192.144.157 (talk) 15:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  fruit quark
Talk:Cosmic Wars

message: My memory may be playing tricks on me... but wasn't there an MSX version of this game as well? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.197.202.97 (talk) 05:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSX version? 
Talk:Protura

message: Footnotes come after punctuation.  See Wikipedia:Footnotes#Where to place reference tags for more information.  Neil916 (Talk) 06:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That guideline is currently under dispute, because no consensus can be found to prescribe that formatting. Many respected journals put the footnotes before punctuation, and I, for one, see no reason why articles should not be allowed to do likewise. --Stemonitis 06:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Footnotes proposing to change the Wikipedia house style that you are involved in, and I see that you have reverted the work I put in to change the footnote style to the format listed in the Wikipedia MoS, back to a different one.  A bit of an annoyance due to the time invested, but it's my bad because I wasn't aware that people wanted to change it.  I won't re-revert you, but I'll leave it up to you to fix them again if there isn't consensus to change the house style.  For now, that discussion appears to be stalled and isn't going anywhere.  Neil916 (Talk) 20:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes

message: I'm doubtful that this article has gone through enough review to warrant this A-class rating. Given its length (around one screen), I would think it had significant potential for expansion. Richard001 (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating
Talk:Diplura

message: A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase.  You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Diplura (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 15:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, yes. Not easy to incorporate that into this article. I've moved that article out of userspace to Diplura (alga), where it clearly belongs. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-generated content 

message: This article seems a little short to me for an A-class rating. Surely this is not all that is known about diplurans? Richard001 (talk) 22:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality rating

message: The article states that Diplura has been re-designated a class, but otherwise continues to treat it as an order. Aboctok (talk) 12:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order or class?
Talk:Jerry York (businessman)

message: I have found nothing to indicate that York recently returned to the GM Board as claimed in the lead paragraph.  Please help find a source to confirm this. Racepacket (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: GM Board
Talk:Apterygota

message: I'm trying to find out what Aptera is.  It used to be an order.  Is it definitively obsolete?  Is it disputed?  Now there's just a disambiguation page to the car company, the Greek island, and some species that have aptera as their specific epithet.  It used to redirect to here, but there's nothing here about the apparently-obsolete order.
--Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says:
"....While the first three groups formed a monophyletic group, the Entognatha..."
However when we go to the article on Entognatha we find that "...The orders are not closely related, and so Entognatha is considered a polyphyletic group..."
Ammimajus (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Phylogeny mono or poly

message: Ametabola is currently a redirect to Apterygota, but as far as I can tell, "ametabola" is also a latin-based general term for lack of metamorphosis in other groups (spiders, crustaceans etc.)
There was also some confusion with ametabolism → cryptobiosis marked as a synonym (probably from the French-language faux-ami amétabole) for this term, but I've tried to fix that.
Should ametabola be changed to the more general term instead the specific insect group which shows this characteristic? — OttoMäkelä (talk) 14:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ametabola
Talk:Macworld

message: So what is the circulation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingedbeaver (talk • contribs) 01:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circulation 

message: This article should have a section on the Macworld Conference & Expo, considering how important it was to both Apple and the greater Mac community. Incredibly major products were announced at the Macworld keynote, including the iPhone in January 2007. If there is an article discussing these expo events, perhaps link to it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:240:8003:7B90:955F:A15B:24CA:3433 (talk) 00:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conference 
Talk:Michael Scott (Apple)

message: I've removed the couple of sentences about Scott being actually dismissed from Apple because of his homosexuality.  The lines were sourced, from the Michael Malone book Infinite Loop.  However, if you read the book, it's a bizarre allegation.  The rest of the book, when it makes some sort of assertion, backs it up with interviews and explains the author's reasoning.  The allegation that Scott was dismissed because he was homosexual takes up a couple of paragraphs and just throws it out there, without explaining how that author came to that conclusion.  Either it's his personal opinion, or it needs further corroboration, and until we have that, it shouldn't be included in this article. —Cleared as filed. 13:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged "behind the scenes" reason for Scott's dismissal

message: One of the reasons why Mike fired those 40 engineers (mostly from the Apple /// project as I recall) was due to the fact that IBM had just announced the Intel 8086-based PC at a time when the Apple /// project was in some pain due to delivery problems related to quality of a certain component (the clock chip).  The mood was stressful, and some gesture or change in direction was needed.  Mike was asked why the firings, and he responded "IBM has just brought out a competing product.  They make more off interest on their petty cash than we take in a year, and these guys are trying to invent a duck quack synthesizer."  Mind, discovering the "Quack" system sound on the Mac LC we bought a year or two later was the object of more than a few chortles. (Attribution is first hand, from Kelley Johnston, Apple MIS software development manager at Cupertino in 1981.) Don't know whether this belongs in the main page or not, but I thought it needed to be said (--KJ.  Please direct questions to nefariouswheel@gmail.com).
On an unrelated note, if I could offer the opinion of someone who was there, nobody at Apple cared whether anyone was gay or not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.53.35.32 (talk) 05:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Further to "Black Wednesday"

message: Theres some "choice" phrases being posted below the references, don't know how to get rid of them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpmayne (talk • contribs) 23:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slander at bottom 

message: The title of this article makes it seem like Michael Scott is a type of apple --Benimation (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it taste like?
Talk:Michael Spindler

message: What's with Spindler nowadays? Is he alive? If so, what is he doing? Is his health OK? Demf 19:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When he was at Apple, he got easily stressed; he was never suited for the job of a CEO. I guess he's still alive, I don't think he ever liked much publicity. — Wackymacs 19:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: wow..from the article: "Spindler died of illness in 2017."  yes, "Illness" kills quite a few people every year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.96.255 (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Today

message: the newton technology ecosystem never achieved it's potential but calling it failed project, at least during spindler's time strikes me as a stretch.  newton got off to a very rocky start (mostly due to poor marketing that over-emphasized the immature handwriting recognition feature) and took a couple of iterations to mature.  the platform became quite good and was poised to take off when the plug was pulled, apparently for reasons that had more to do with personalities and politics than the technical merits or market potential of the product line. please recall that despite much better initial marketing the macintosh got off to pretty rough start as well. it took foresight and perseverance to see the mac through the three or four product generations it took to become viable.  i think the foresight and perseverance of spindler and amelio to nurture newton, sculley's ugly ducking through to swan status was also admirable.   i'm not sure how to characterize it as "successful" may not be a great fit, but neither is "failed".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.196.235 (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newton a failed project?
Talk:Darlingtonia californica

message: unique among carnivorous pitcher plants. assessed mid imprtance. Anlace 03:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: As pointed out here, giving IPA pronunciations for scientific names is problematic. If it is to be done, however, it should reflect the regional pronunciation where the plant is native, in this case the US. See International Phonetic Alphabet for English for details.--Curtis Clark (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: — Assignment last updated by Spatel35 (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History