lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Priddy Circles

message: English Heritage are currently investigating reports of recent damage to this site. As the damage is still 'claimed' and 'under investigation', I haven't updated the article but I'm just including a link to the news stories here   Mighty Antar (talk) 22:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is being reported by reliable sources I think the "investigation" could be included.— Rod talk 07:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reported damage to the enclosures
Talk:The Only Way Is Up

message: As this seemed to be obviously about poverty, I have added it to the category "Songs about poverty". Lyrics such as:
"Being on the bottom rung
Sure ain't no fun
If we should get evicted
Then we will have to leave home"
are surely about poverty. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Poverty

message: Since the image used for the Otis Clay infobox is defaulted to kept, I guess the infobox can stay as well? --George Ho (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  I see nothing wrong with the chronological order in which the infoboxes are placed now, but I'm open to discussing the order of the opening couple of sentences if you feel it's important to mention the Yazz version before the original version.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otis Clay Infobox
Talk:Porlock Weir

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.exmoor-nationalpark.gov.uk/index/learning_about/looking_after_landscape/geology/geological_features.htm (see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 March 10). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Pinhay Cliffs

message: I was going to merge Pinhay Bay & Pinhay Cliffs but can't find any evidence of them in Somerset - the only ones I can find are in Devon - does anyone have any other sources which say there are sites of this name in Somerset - or could we edit the article to put them in Devon?— Rod talk 21:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somerset or Devon
Talk:Pinhay Bay

message: I was going to merge Pinhay Bay & Pinhay Cliffs but can't find any evidence of them in Somerset - the only ones I can find are in Devon - does anyone have any other sources which say there are sites of this name in Somerset - or could we edit the article to put them in Devon?— Rod talk 21:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, sorry for the three year delay! I have found no evidence of the Pinhay Cliffs being in Somerset because Pinhay Bay connects with the Ware Cliffs which both lie on the Devon-Dorset border. However, there may be some confusion of a settlement called 'Pinhay' in Carhampton near Minehead. Jaguar (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somerset or Devon
Talk:The Seven Joys of Mary (carol)

message: I made the following changes to this article:
* Revised one cross reference to read the Seven Joys of the Virgin rather than The Seven Joys of Mary because the former article is a fuller discussion of the same topic.
* Deleted a line of information that required a citation and had been tagged as such for a month.
* Deleted an inaccurate statement and replaced it with a statement that properly introduces the table of information. -- Chironomia (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions to Article (4/19/08)

message: It is nice to have the notation for the melody, However, when an article is about an allegedly "traditional" song, it would be helpful to have:  1) the particular tradition (in this case, English? I'm guessing), and the approximate date, at least to the extent of something like "probably 17th century" or similar, if the precise dating is unknown.  
Of course there could easily be different dates for the tune and the lyrics, and still another date for when the two were put together.  Not all of this information will always be readily available, but I'm not seeing any dating information in this particular article.  From the little given, the piece might date anywhere from 600-1960 AD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 23:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates?
Talk:Vector (journal)

message: What are the numbers in the 1st column of editors and other staff members? For those of us who don't work for the magazine, what does that mean? Stevenmitchell (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers in 1st Column?

message: These long lists of editors don't seem particularly useful so moved to talk RJFJR (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Long lists

message: Stableford classifies it as a fanzine; authors of the SFE entry call it a journal; ISFDb calls it a fanzine/academic journal (although inconsistently, it also calls Vector a magzine in entries like here; and the publication calls itself a journal. I am going to be bold and rename it to Vector (journal). PS. I'd say calling it a fanzine and academic journal is fringe (it is not indexed in academic databases, as far as I can tell: ); but calling it a journal seems more correct than magazine. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magazine?
Talk:Oath, Somerset

message: Guthrum baptism: I deleted this paragraph as it wasn't supported by references. All the references I know about, including the Wikipedia Guthrum page, say the baptism took place at Aller. Local legend and St. Andrew church legend say that the Aller church stands on the site of an old church erected on the place where the baptism took place. The fact that the Saxon font was found nearby (actually 1/4 mile to the east of the church, NOT to the west where Oath is) also suggests that Aller was the site of the baptism, not Oath Hill. 
I did wonder if Oath Hill was the name of the hill on which old Aller was located (the village -- except for one ancient farm-- but not the church -- have relocated to the base of Aller hill, further to the east, away from Oath and the Parrett) but when I followed the navigational links, they clearly showed Oath, NOT the hill on which St. Andrews stands (and on which the ancient village of Aller once stood)Celia Kozlowski (talk) 09:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Oakhill

message: I propose that Oakhill Brewery be merged into Oakhill. I think that the content in the Oakhill Brewery article can easily be explained in the context of this article, and is of such small size thhat I do not think undue weight is concerned. There was a previous discussion on the deletion of the Brewery article several years ago here, where the consensus was to merge, but that was reverted less than a month after, and has gone unnoticed.  Greggydude (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't oppose a merge, but looking at the previous deletion discussion (AfD in 2007) it does appear there was consensus to keep (rather than merge) on the grounds that the brewery was notable because of its age and some of the references found which could be used to expand the article.— Rod talk 11:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no further comment on this after a few months, can we remove the proposed merge banner?— Rod talk 18:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has still not been any response I have removed the merge banner. If anyone still feels this is needed, please puit a comment here and I'm, sure something can be achieved.— Rod talk 21:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Nunney

message: I propose merging Holwell, Somerset into this article as it is within the parish & unlikely to have a significant article in its own right. Any thoughts?— Rod talk 18:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger completed.— Rod talk 11:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Northover

message: I've found 2 places in Somerset called Northover. One is part of Ilchester at  & the other on the outskirts of Glastonbury at . I think both should be included in their parish articles & perhaps a disambiguation page put in the place of the current (not very informative) article. Any thoughts?— Rod talk 15:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 tiny places ? disambiguation page 

message: I found  while building List of peaks on the British Columbia-Alberta border.  The cite has no mention of a name origin, but bivouac.com does, apparently from a climbing or parks guide -  gives the namesake as a Lieutenant A.W. Northover of the 28th Battalion of the Canadian Expeditionary Forces in World War I.  The peak was named in 1917 and is most likely in his memory, either for death or deed (most such peaks are for the dead, but not all e.g. Mount Cornwell).  Some ancestral connection to either village is very likely.  There's also , a locality in New Jersey.Skookum1 (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Northover
Talk:The Round Table (journal)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Round Table Journal (Template) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 14:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Round Table Journal (Template)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mortem

message: I put up a new version, let me know if you'd like to see any information verified. UltimateEnd 14:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new version 

message: I've added an "Unreferenced" code to the article, I hope me doing that wasn't against the rules but as I understand it it applies here. In the meantime I've had contact with Mortem again and they have informed me that they will try to work on a new biography. I've asked them to add this new biography themselves so that it would fall under the wikipedia rules concerning "Self-published and questionable sources in articles about themselves" which can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
It states that:
"Material from self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources in articles about themselves, so long as:
    * it is relevant to their notability;
    * it is not contentious;
    * it is not unduly self-serving;
    * it does not involve claims about third parties;
    * it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the subject;
    * there is no reasonable doubt as to who wrote it;
    * the article is not based primarily on such sources."
The history of Peruvian metal is poorly documented so it will be difficult to find sources that apply to the highest standards of academic research that wikipedia requests from it's contributors. Thus Mortem's own contribution is the best that wikipedia can expect in a situation as this. If anyone still wishes to dispute the reliability of the article it would probably be best that they wait until Mortem has found time to finish the article which will probably after the end of October (they have other things in their lives besides wikipedia, I'm sure you can understand that) In the meantime the Mortem article can be used as a stub if anyone can find verifiable information. If any administrator or experienced wikipedian sees a need to inform me of anything regarding the rules of contributing to wikipedia that I might have overlooked I'd appreciate it. UltimateEnd 19:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ok
Talk:North Curry

message: This text shows up in Google search, but does not appear on the Wiki page:
"Ornate church building with hexagonal tower."
Is it a tag on the image?
The tower is in fact octagonal
EJT (talk) 09:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This was in an ALT tag for the image (used by those with text to speech readers & similar). I have now changed it.— Rod talk 09:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hexagonal tower
Talk:Newton Surmaville

message: Mr Pevsner makes this error in his 1958 book South and West Somerset (London: Penguin The Buildings of England series) and it has been promulgated elsewhere. Robert Harbin (1526-1621) bought the manor of Newton Surmaville in 1608, and it was conveyed to Robert's eldest son John soon after its purchase in 1609 (Bates Harbin 1910, 21; Nares 1952, 678).  The old manor house was demolished and the new house was built between 1608 and the presumed end date of construction of 1612 (indicated by dates on the lead rainwater heads) (Bates Harbin 1910, 20; Nares 1952, 676; Dunning 1993, 112) 
Princess Venetia di Cannoli 13:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Erroneous 1602 date for start of construction
Talk:Artificial Intelligence (journal)

message: is from the University of Leeds
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaleditorialboard.cws_home/505601/editorialboard
their search engine is not intelligent at all
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/quick_links/ql1.htm
--58.38.43.215 (talk) 04:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Although one of the current Editors-in-chief 

message: Physics of gravitational development Crossfirehawk (talk) 06:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of Gravity
Talk:The Wife Wrapt in Wether's Skin

message: This article should be merged with "Wee Cooper O'Fife" as they are the same song. Ogg (talk) 09:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. They are the same folk song. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wee Cooper O'Fife 

message: What does the last line of the article mean? It makes no sense: "... he does not have a pretext for his beating her not really being beating her." — ★Parsa ☞ talk 17:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last line
Talk:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

message: Wasn't this journal a spin-off of what, until about 1965, called the "Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology"  - until that got split into two different journals, the "Journal of Abnormal Psychology" and the "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"? This should be mentioned in the article. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Milborne Port

message: There is a part that mentions that the last leather factory closed in 1970 but that isn't true. The Wingrove & Edge Tannery was in production into some time in the early 2000's. Then the site was sold to developers and is now a housing estate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.238.189 (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to A brief history of Milborne Port it is a town, but there has been a lot of issues recently with a user changing villages to towns & towns to vilages withot checking see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Problematic edits on a large number of articles therefore this may have been one of the ones changed.— Rod talk 16:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 
Talk:Midford Brook

message: Assessed as start and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Needs a map and could benefit from expanding into structure as suggested at project page. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Computational Linguistics (journal)

message: Computational linguistics is an interdisciplinary field concerned with the computational modelling of natural language, as well as the study of appropriate computational approaches to linguistic questions. In general, computational linguistics draws upon linguistics, computer science, artificial intelligence, mathematics, logic, philosophy, cognitive science, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics, anthropology and neuroscience, among others 5.112.251.158 (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computational linguistics is an interdisciplinary field concerned with the computational modelling of natural language, as well as the study of appropriate computational approaches to linguistic questions. In general, computational linguistics draws upon linguistics, computer science, artificial intelligence, mathematics, logic, philosophy, cognitive science, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics, anthropology and neuroscience, among others
Talk:Mendip Way

message: Should this read Rowbarrow or Rowberrow warren?— Rod talk 14:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Good catch sir! It's fixed. Derek Andrews (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowbarrow v Rowberrow 
Talk:Meare

message: I propose merging Westhay into this article as it is within the Meare parish & we could combine both stubs into one reasonable article. They are never likely to be much more that stubs separately.— Rod talk 15:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I've removed the merger proposal banners & added a link to the parish in the Westhay article - but it could do with expanding.— Rod talk 21:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This is hugely removed from the legitimate subject-matter of an article about a village.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: the d'Hondt method of party-list proportional representation
Talk:Martock

message: Whist Martock might have been a town in the past, I'm not sure it can be described as such today. The parish council is not a town council for a start. And a search online gives far more examples of the place being described as a village than a town. Argovian (talk) 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Town or village

message: Website = https://www.martock.org.uk
Official community website created for Martock. It is operated by the Martock Community Partnership, where the Martock Community Partnership consists of organisations that include the South Somerset District Council and the Martock Parish Council. Kacperjednorowicz (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done Dr.Pinsky (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2022
Talk:Journal of Recreational Mathematics

message: The webpage of the periodical has a final copyright date of 2007 but does not indicate non-publication.  The library here claims they are supposed to receive copies but have nothing in last several years (The librarian when asked just shrugged it off as slow a while back).Julzes (talk) 05:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anybody know what is going on here?
Talk:The American Journal of Psychiatry

message: Not relevant to the topic. This is from an article about suicide rate. Just because the American Journal of Psychiatry is mentioned in it--or that the AJP has published on the topic--doesn't make it relevant to the explanation of what the American Journal of Psychiatry IS. You can't just make sections on every single thing that the AJP publishes or every article that cites the AJP--that would mean a site bigger than Wikipedia. I don't even think this warrants a discussion, but as a non-member I haven't yet made it personal policy to delete others' contributions. I at very least should bring to people's attention that this does not belong. (Example of what proper Academic Journal entry sections might consist of: International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology) 67.42.153.166 (talk) 11:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed: Suicide Rate
Talk:Marcus Patrick

message: The YouTube account listed in the External Links section was suspended in 2011 and Marcus uses a different one now.
https://www.youtube.com/user/PatrickMarcusOsborne 
In 2011 Marcus married Alisa Patrick Osborne (proof available on YouTube).
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.144.108.227 (talk) 13:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That was him in 1994, right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEsaGUVMXAM - I am not entirely certain so I won't make any edits, but I think that was him there. In that case it should be mentioned in the main article under the audio/music subsection. (In the event the video is gone, this was from "PATRIC - Love Me" and I think the PATRIC refers to his original name.) 2A02:8388:1641:5500:0:0:0:1 (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luxborough

message: The way this village was 'articled' was asymetric, with redirects for the hamlets of Kingsbridge and Churchtown, but a separate article for Pooltown. The Pooltown article said very little that this article didn't, and nothing that couldn't easily be added. So I've merged the two articles, and made Pooltown a redirect.
The one downside of this is that we lose the geo coordinates of Pooltown. However as all the hamlets are within 1 mile of each other, on balance I think we can live with this. The alternative would be to create articles for Kingsbridge and Churchtown, as well as reinstating Pooltown. Both approaches have precedents, and I've done similar myself for other places, so I've no problem if somebody wants to go down that route. -- Starbois (talk) 10:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, I think I went down this route because of the wording of the article, which told me that Luxborough was a single village made up of three hamlets. If the article had said Luxborough was a civil parish made up of three villages, I would have been more likely to plump for separate articles. That might help future editors make up their minds what to do. -- Starbois (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Pooltown 