lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elizabeth Durack

message: I removed unreferenced material that was a) placed in the wrong section and b) implied the pseudonym was okay.
In March 1997, Durack became the subject of controversy when she revealed through an article by art historian, Robert Smith, in the journal,Art Monthly that she had entered paintings into Aboriginal art exhibitions under the name Eddie Burrup. Despite the storm that followed the revelation of using the time-honoured device of a pseudonym, Elizabeth Durack continued to paint for Eddie Burrup until a few weeks before she died.
Especially time-honoured device bit needs contextualising. As pure pseudonym (ie, another Western name), it would be acceptable, but the problem arises from a white person appropriating an Aboriginal identity and in a sense impersonated an Aboriginal, putting "his" works into Aboriginal art exhibitions which have limiting criteria. Part of the story was that Burrup's art sold better than that under the name of Durack but all this needs good references and awareness of the complexities. (I've just re-entered some of the stuff without that claim but refs still needed.) Didn't, it's touchy.  Julia Rossi (talk) 06:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Eddie Burrup is a pseudonym of Elizabeth Durack. Once duplicated entries regarding Durrack are removed removed, primary sources removed, and unsourced puffery is trimmed, the article would be 3 paragraphs covering an Overview, references on one side of the controversy, and references on the opposing side of the controversy. This can easily form a section within  Elizabeth Durack rather than a separate article. Flat Out let's discuss it 14:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Eddie Burrup has had a significant overhaul. If anyone is interested please comment on whether this could be merged into Elizabeth Durack. Flat Out let's discuss it 04:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Yes, go ahead and merge them. I see no reason to keep them separate when they are the same person. Erté, Lo Spagna, Giottino and a host of other painters already have both their real name and pseudonym on the same article, as should this person's. ComfyKem (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - merge complete and Burrup redirected to this article. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Eddie Burrup]] 
Talk:Jack Norworth

message: According his granddaughter, "Shine On Harvest Moon" was actually written by Dave Stamper, and sold outright to Jack Norworth. This was not an uncommon thing during that time period.K8 fan 19:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have added a  to the caption of :File:Bayesjack.jpg;   the image it is credited as being a poster for the Acousticon Hour. Given that from what I can find Norworth and Bayes split up c. 1913 (a decade and a half before the radio show) and the visible text mentions "Keith's" but not "Acousticon", the claim looks questionable to me. I note that the web page the photo is from no longer exists, and the Internet Archive Wayback doesn't have a copy of it
I notice the claim was added by User:Cculber007 in this edit. I am also asking User:Cculber007 and the file's original Wikipedia uploader, User:Pepso2 about the photo on their talk page. -- 00:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Pepso2 removed the claim, and states it appears to be incorrect .  Unless Cculber007 provides some unexpected additional info, I think it should stay off. Infrogmation (talk) 01:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bayesjack.jpg - Questionable claim
Talk:Tactical Support Wing

message: The Carrier air wing article states that this unit is longer deployable due to cost saving measures. Can someone provide some details on this and perhaps update this article with citations? Regards Daysleeper47 (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Carrier air wing]] 

message: Suggest this article be retitled Tactical Support Wing (Navy).  It is dedicated to a single unit.  Mainly during the Korean War, the United States Air Force organized numbered Tactical Support Wings.  The wings organized in Korea were to short-lived to meet notability standards, but still need to be differentiated.--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: This article depends on a single source.  It also lists a Wikipedia page as a source contrary to Wikipedia:Verifiability#Wikipedia and sources that mirror or use it--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Rosaleen Norton

message: Is that a magickal year beknownst only unto witches? 99.247.1.157 (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  19889? 

message: This site has a better image of Norton, and I'm pretty certain it falls under fair use:
https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/9cd84dfbe9c1c048763e12f5d7b193a2  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:8104:730:344F:CCC4:B56E:71DB (talk) 02:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image 

message: sexual intercourse with gay men [...] she could play the active role
In other words, pegging; so why not simply say that? RIP Victorian prudery.
Nuttyskin (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex with gay men?
Talk:John Radecki

message: He became a naturalized Australian citizen in November 1904.
: Not possible.  Australian citizenship did not exist until 26 January 1949.  The best people could do before then was become British subjects.  I presume this is what we're trying to say there.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 20:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  With respect, Jack of Oz, I have a copy of John's Australian Natualization Certificate, which includes at the top that it is in conformance with the "Naturalization Act of 1903". 74.100.89.18 (talk) 23:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  @ 74.100.89.18: Belatedy, I think you'll probably find that this was his naturalisation as a British subject. As I stated above, Australian citizenship simply did not exist until 1949. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian citizen?
Talk:Brook Andrew

message: This article was created with copyvio materal from a commercial gallery bio. However, Brook Andrew is a notable artist by WP policy. There are some reliable sources that can be used to rebuild this piece. Please dont' plagiarise! hamiltonstone (talk) 01:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: I have reverted this article to a stub (Version 399332467 by SMasters (talk)) as the whole page was a copyright violation taken from here. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More copyright violation
Talk:Vallam

message: uncited allegations removed.59.144.15.223 07:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Please provide Citations —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.144.5.179 (talk) 08:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-brahmin 

message: Harlowraman 13:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please mention why anti-brahminism was mentioned
Talk:Margaret Preston

message: There is a lot of good information here, but the style is horrible. It needs to be wikified, with internal links, references, section headers... And it has a bunch of possibly non-notable, sentimental information that doesn't seem very encyclopedic. Logical Gentleman (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The main issue appears to be that an outside website was ported into Wikipedia wholesale and with no citations on 9 August 2009, a blatant copyright violation. (Or just possibly the very long 9 August edit was later ported outwards, but it doesn't look like it because the outside website is sourced and appears to date to February 2009.) Anyway, I have worked on cleaning up the article as I agree with your general take on this. It could still use a larger number of sources, however, as right now there are really just two.Alafarge (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Antonio Dattilo Rubbo

message: From book Frattamaggiore: storia, chiese e monumenti, uomini illustri, documenti by Susio Capasso, pub. Istituto di studi Atellani:
:"Questo grande Pittore, il maggiore di Australia, ove visse dalla giovinezza e mori è oriundo di Frattamaggiore" — found here
. . . something to do with him being Australia's greatest painter, connected from youth to death with Frattamaggiore but how? Doug butler (talk) 21:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation please
Talk:Julian Ashton

message: Hello. I suggest creating a separate page for Ashton's Sydney Art School, as it has outlasted him. Would others agree? Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Julian Ashton Art School now exists; primarily due to the heritage-listing of the building since 2002; and the importance of the school in its education of leading artists. Rangasyd (talk) 02:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate page for Ashton's Sydney Art School?

message: I'm not sure if it is worth including in the article but he was the subject of a mugging on 24 July 1895. Two of his assailants were arrested and convicted. From Hill To Shore (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mugging 

message: Is there a source to support his first wife's name? This article says she was Mary Ann Pugh but Peerage.com names her Eliza Ann Pugh. She was apparently a prominent journalist and social reformer in the 1890s but all of the other sources I have found refer to her as "Mrs Julian Ashton" or "Faustine" (the pen name she used in some newspaper columns). From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've managed to answer my own question. I've stumbled across a painting he made of his wife, titled "Eliza Ashton." It is out of copyright, so I'll upload a copy to Commons when I get back to my PC. From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First wife's name
Talk:Louise Hearman

message: Have removed the prod, I am satisfied the artist is notable within Australia.  I've expanded the article based on google australia search returns, and would also note the artist was featured in issue 8 of Australian Art Collector, a quarterly magazine describing itself as "Australia’s leading art market magazine.". . Hiding Talk  22:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: What is the ancestry / ethnic background of Louise Hearman? --197.228.8.16 (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 
Talk:Stella Bowen

message: It would be helpful if someone could state WHY Stella and Ford fled to rural England, and WHAT HARDSHIPS caused them to leave for France.154.5.187.216 (talk) 16:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Chumpoll!  This source is certainly better than the unsourced assertion the article had about colon cancer, so I've edited the article to say "breast and liver cancer", and cited the source you mentioned.  You can see the "diff" (difference view) of my edit here. Welcome to Wikipedia! :) Ijon (talk) 06:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bernard Smith (art historian)

message: This reference:
http://www.sustainability.murdoch.edu.au/publications/amhope/smith.html
(a transcript of a talk Smith gave at a Scince and Society conference (date?))
- suggests that 'Place, Taste and Tradition' was first published in 1945.
The text of the talk concerns his proposal that the term 'formalesque' should be used to replace the now anachronistic use of the term 'modern' to describe the artistic period beginning in the 1890s and which dominated untilt the 1950's.
* Ok. Place taste trad was indeed first published in 1945. Red tiles 06:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sometime it might make sense to create pages for a couple of other fairly notable artistic figures similarly named and occasionally confused (complete with disambiguation or 'not to be confused with...' links) - I'm thinking for example of Bernhard Smith (1820-1885), British->Australian sculptor and painter (qv http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/smith-bernhard-4599), and Molly Bernhard-Smith, British art dealer (qv http://stnicholasatwade.org.uk/molly.html). Note that these two are both spelled Bernhard Smith, and that in Molly's case it is a hyphenated surname. I might do it when I get time, but for the moment I'm just throwing this out there.
Ozaru (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future plan... 
Talk:Andrew Maxwell

message: Andrew Maxwell is actually or was a member of the Methodist church. 
83.70.79.134 (talk) 21:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: I thought I had heard on BBC Radio 4 tonight that Andrew Maxwell presented the programme called "Welcome to Wherever You Are". If this is so, it could go in the article. Vorbee (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome to Wherever You Are
Talk:Second Chance (game show)

message: I forget the guy's name, but I was on IRC with someone from the Bay Area who had some inside knowledge, who says that the tapes of at least some of the episodes might still exist and would be found as soon as someone (at GSN, we would assume) screens the rest of the Family Feud tapes (both shows aired on ABC at about the same time so this is plausible). This is, for now, just as much of a rumor as that they've been erased, but maybe someone can investigate. --Shawn K. Quinn 09:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode status 

message: One YouTube poster claimed in a text comment for the first portion of the uploaded Pilot #3 that they saw an episode (which may or may not be the same one) on GSN at one point. Verbatim, as much as I detest bad spelling and punctuation...
"I can swear I saw this on GSN one time and one time only. (AND NO I am not mistakeing it for Press Your Luck. or whammy." ... "I don't remember but the set and spin displays look familer to someing I saw if they did show it I was very young when they did. I wish I could have recorded it."
One response to this suggested that it might have been a "Game Of The Week" special; this has precedent - the only full surviving episodes of Eye Guess and Number Please, as well as the original Jeopardy!'s 2000th episode, aired in this manner...so why not Second Chance?
If anybody could confirm one way or the other, that would be most appreciated. Daniel Benfield (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont know about it having aired even one episode on GSN, but I (or anybody else if they can) will look into it. Whammies Were Here 21:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumor: ''Second Chance'' Aired On GSN
Talk:Time Quintet

message: I've removed :Template:Novelinfoboxneeded from this Talk page after addition of a version of Template:Book Series infobox to the article.  Thanks. Karen | Talk | contribs 09:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 03:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about a timeline for the "time" books, eh? --Uncle Ed (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline
Talk:Marie-Madeleine Fourcade

message: No mention of La Cagoule? Angus McLellan  (Talk) 00:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Something missing...
Talk:Solid state Tesla coil

message: This page should be with the rest of the tesla coil pages. Why should it not? I belive there is no reason--Sci-guy21 07:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is different, but is it different enough to merit its own entry?  Given that the main entry for Tesla coil already contains information on SSTCs, it would probably be better to roll this into that in order to keep everything together. --Morrand 21:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Come to think of it, I've got time today.  Material merged into Tesla coil#Tesla's later coils at the end. --Morrand 21:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nuclear Age Peace Foundation

message: :*Header added by Adavis444 (talk) 06:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Wintersleep

message: I don't see the need for a separate section regarding the stolen gear. What do you think? Neon Flow (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stolen Gear
Talk:Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph

message: I understand it was the first new model in 20yr. Can anybody confirm?  Automan 08:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was.  But why was it only produced for 4 years before being replaced??Davez621 (talk) 23:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was replaced because of the separation between Rolls-Royce and Bentley (the former going to BMW, and the latter to Volkswagen AG). Since BMW got the Rolls-Royce brand, it developed a new model to re-launch the brand. Sacxpert (talk) 08:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A new Roller?!! Stop the presses!

message: This was the first RR to have the new disappearing hood ornament safety feature, right? --RThompson82 (talk) 00:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: First disappearing hood ornament
Talk:Cetotherium

message: I looked all over the Internet and I still can't find the size of the prehistoric whale. Was it the size of Megalodon? or was it a little bigger? If somebody out there can help find the size of the whale, that will be great. Johnny542 08:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was smaller than a Megalodon, since it was a pray as stated in the article. \\Zhi\\ (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding the following nominal species of Cetotherium:
1. Cetotherium capellinii is the type species of Cetotheriophanes Brandt, 1873 (Demere et. al. 2005).
2. The generic and familial placement of Cetotherium furlongi is questionable because the skull of the holotype has gone missing (Kimura and Hasegawa 2010).
3. Cetotherium maicopicum has been referred to the Caucasian genus Kurdalagonus (Tarasenko and Lopatin 2012). 
4. Cetotherium parvum Trouessart, 1898 is an unnecessary replacement name for Balaenoptera pusillum Cope, 1868 (Troussart 1898 noted that the placement of B. pusillus in Cetotherium made Cope's name a secondary homonym of Cetotherium pusillum Nordman, 1860 from Moldova; however, there is no evidence that Balaenoptera pusillus belongs to Cetotherium and thus Cope's taxon is a nomen dubium as per Barnes and McLeod 1984, even though Balaenoptera pusillus is nomenclaturally valid]). Cetotherium polyphorum (Cope, 1869) is a new combination by Trouessart (1898) for Eschrichtius polyporum Cope, 1869, likewise relegated to nomen dubium status by Barnes and McLeod (1984)
Kimura, T.; Hasegawa, Y. (2010). "A new baleen whale (Mysticeti: Cetotheriidae) from the earliest Late Miocene of Japan and a reconsideration of the phylogeny of Cetotheres". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30 (2): 577–591.
M. D. Uhen, R. E. Fordyce, and L. G. Barnes. 2008. Mysticeti. In C. M. Janis, K. M. Scott, and L. L. Jacobs (eds.), Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America II:607-628
L. G. Barnes and S. A. McLeod. 1984. 1. The Fossil Record and Phyletic Relationships of Gray Whales. The Gray Whale: Eschrichitius robustus 3-32
E. L. Trouessart. 1898. Catalogus mammalium tam viventium quam fossilum 5:665-1264
T. A. Demere, A. Berta, and M. R. McGowen. 2005. The taxonomic and evolutionary history of modern balaenopteroid mysticetes. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 12(1/2):99-143. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cetotherium nominal species