Talk:Formula One (video game series)

message: Hi GL3N here, as there was alot of information I have put them together so it is easier at Formula_One_Games, if thats better, with links to seperate games. What do you think ?
:: Merged! Thanks. --Mateusc 03:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: info

message: I am removing the following sentence: The game was originally only released in Europe in the PAL format, but in recent years full NTSC compatibility has been added.  According to the GameFAQs database, each of the first four games of the series had either an NTSC U/C (North America) or NTSC J (Japan) release.  Majin Izlude 15:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PAL and NTSC releases 

message: This is kind of weird, but this thing says that it's made by Sony and only for the Playstations but I have Formula One 2000 for Game Boy Color, and on the game (old, dont even know where I got it so only have the game) it doesn't mention anything about Sony... --Yarnalgo 01:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the game (the one I have) it actually has a Take-Two Interactive logo on it... also I found these: , , , , , , ,  .... but when I looked for other games in the series on none-Sony consoles I couldn't find any......plus this page hasn't been edited for like 2 months so if no one responds in a couple days I'm gonnna put it down that it is on Game Boy Color too. --Yarnalgo 02:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm marking it down for GBC. --Yarnalgo 19:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sony/Playstation?? 

message: :Image:F105ps2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:F105ps2.jpg

message: :Image:F1 05 official.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:F1 05 official.jpg

message: Article become very long and splited per Wikipedia:Summary style and WP:CVG  --Ciao 90 14:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split 

message: Does anyone know if the f1 video game series will come to Xbox 360 and have sony signed a new contract to make the games.
:It seems that nobody is developing an F1 game at the moment.  Sony's exclusive contract was for four seasons (2003-2006). They've been mysteriously silent about a 2007 season game (F1 was a no-show at the Leipzig conference), and nothing has been mentioned of them (or any other company) getting a new licensing deal from the FOA/FOM.  To top it off, fifty employees at Sony Studio Liverpool were laid off a few months ago.  It's not looking good for F1 gamers. (I see that someone already edited the article to refer to the series in the past tense.)  Majin Izlude talk 16:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  F1 games sells poor in USA and Japan and this is because nobody in gaming industry is interested in develop a game that will obvious lose money invested. Geoff Crammond stated in EGM July 2007 he is not interested in develop Grand Prix 5 soon maybe in future who knows?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciao 90 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've heard, the only reason there wasn't a 2007 game was because they were too busy making F1 CE. Clearly Studio Liverpool havn't given the Series priority, but I Dought there will be no 2008 Game - LinczoneTalk/Watch 13:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of series 

message: One thing to say about that, so glad that EA didn't get it, they would've wrecked it, Codemasters will make brilliant graphics, let's hope everything else will be just as good.--80.4.6.146 (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codemasters exclusive F1 rights 

message: :Any additional comments:
Wouldn't standard practice be to include the developer name, giving the slightly longwinded Formula One (Studio Liverpool video game series). A redirect should also be created from Formula One (Psygnosis video game series). AlexJ (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Am I the only one who noticed that this is an page on the Studio Liverpool video game series an that F1 2010 is a Codemaster game eeven thought it is on PS3.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex314 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  F1 2010 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Formula One (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050404100036/http://www.ps2-f104.com/ to http://www.ps2-f104.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050209121034/http://www.formula1-00.com/ to http://www.formula1-00.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050209133142/http://www.formula1-1999.com/ to http://www.formula1-1999.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Needs update as codemasters were bourgh by EA Nbisbo (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs update