lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nose tackle

message: The information regarding the 4-3 "nose tackle" is somewhere between misleading and incorrect.  While in specific defensive playbooks, 4-3 interior linemen may be designated as Nose Tackle and Under Tackle (as opposed to having no designation as the article suggests) rather than Right Tackle and Left Tackle, both interior linemen are not playing the nose tackle position, because nose tackle is ONLY the middle defensive lineman in a 3-lineman defense or a 5 lineman defense.  They are simply playing a specific or specialized technique in the Defensive Tackle position.
The assertion that Baltimore employed two nose tackles the year they won the Super Bowl is absurd.  There can only be one nose tackle, and although both of the DTs the Ravens started that year, Tony Siragusa and Sam Adams, were well-suited to playing Nose Tackle, neither one did because they played in a 4-man front.
———
I've added a section on the 3-4 scheme. It's to the best of my knowledge, so feel free to edit it. The information previously provided was so incomplete that I felt something was better than nothing. PenoftheAuthor 03:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This is just a form of a defensive tackle... it is just how the defensive tackle is used. Why don't we merge this with the Defensive tackle article? --Brian Seel (talk) 10:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I agree that a nose tackle is just a position of defensive tackle.--164.64.164.35 (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also a Nose guard page that describes this position.  Merge also? 137.186.223.18 (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE! 

message: There is a nose guard page, which is the same as a nose tackle, MERGE!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.159.67.168 (talk) 18:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as Nose Guard
Talk:The Best Time of Your Life

message: This article copies a lot of text from There's a Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow, making it confusing in parts regarding which of the two songs is meant.  Powers T 20:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article also copies a lot of the text from The Glorious Fourth as well. SpikeJones 19:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: I just rewrote the article for clarity and removed the irrelevant info.  BigThunderMtn (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten
Talk:Canes Venaciti Cloud

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:Canes Venatici cloud.  The name "Canes Venatici Cloud" is now used to describe the M94 Group, as revealed by searches for the term at the ADS Abstract Service, the SIMBAD Astronomical Database, and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database.  It is no longer used to describe anything that contains the Milky Way.  Please do not recreate the page without contacting me first.  Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 20:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page recreation
Talk:Physics/wip/leadproposal1

message: This is definitely my all-time favorite. The only suggestion I can make is to replace space and time with spacetime in the first sentence. Nick Mks 20:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, I think Krea has a point here that this proposal may be too long for the lead. For instance, the modern/classical discussion is probably more appropriate for the Introduction. Perhaps the same goes for the theory/experiment discussion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua Davis (talk • contribs) 
I do not quite agree that there is a problem with length. If we ever want to get this article featured (which I hope is the eventual purpose of all this), we will need a four-paragraph introduction or lead or whatever you want to call it (the thing before the TOC). I think this is perfect for that. We should still work out the space/time (and indeed also matter/energy, even though this distinction is still quite natural if you look at the fermion/boson distinction: it's not because mass and energy can be converted into each other that they are the same) thing though. Nick Mks 08:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, I'm on board for now. I might argue later that a sentence here or there should be removed/modified. But all told this is nice. Joshua Davis 18:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, but we are discussing the lead here (that's obviously the part before the TOC). In my view, the post TOC introduction should be edited to match the lead, not the other way around. Nick Mks 18:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: To me, this proposal looks pretty good. But I would hope that the authors keep in mind that they are not writing for physicists but for the average well-informed reader. Beginning with concepts that are part of the experience of general readers and that can be sharpened and clarified in the course of this and related articles is preferable, IMHO, to jumping immediately to concepts that would send the average reader immediately to other articles or a dictionary.  In particular, discussion of the meaning of "law" seems out of place in a basic article. P0M 22:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the forest level
Talk:Brian Robertson (trombonist)

message: I moved here:
: He was best friends with fellow bandmate and trombone player Ryan Dallas Cook, who died on October 19, 2005 in a hit-and-run accident. Brian helps create all the band's signature choreography.
"Best friends" may become encyclopedic when the friendship or death is verifiably related to his musicianship or professional activity. "Signature" could mean anything; if they are noted for choreography and he verifiably contributes to that, say so here, & explain why in the band article.--Jerzy•t 07:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed material 
Talk:Royal Lao Government

message: Is there an article on the murdered King Sasavang Vong and his family?  If there is I cannot find it, these pages aren't linked very well.  If there is not one there really ought be. --Couter-revolutionary 20:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sisavang Vong == King Sasavang Vong?  What would be nice is a page going over the family tree just so that names can be  on one page so they are standardized for the rest of the articles. --MarsRover 23:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, yes, I found it too.  Nowhere linked to these articles though, by reading most of them one wouldn't even get the impression there was a King, just the three Princes.  This was a major event; the murder of a Royal Family.  More needs written about it I think. That Page would be good, yes. --Couter-revolutionary 23:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: New to the process, but a quick observation shows that there is similar information at the Laotian Royal Family page. Should these two articles be combined? Cam Vilay (talk) 06:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles?
Talk:Titanium(III) oxide

message: It appears that someone has made this article just because they found a broken link to it. This needs some serious attention or deletion. (shouldn't it also be bititanium trioxide?) Jake95 20:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jake95.  Yes, you are right, hence the appropriate tags  and .  But we chemists have a lot of these articles on the list, still waiting to be expanded.  The title is fine, inorganic salts are generally named like this (or, if there is only one oxide known, simply "metal oxide" (the stoichiometry comes from the normal oxidation states).  Hope this explains.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be deleted, namely because of the minute users that know about Titanium(III) oxide. --[[ (talk) 07:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of article
Talk:Kodiak tobacco

message: Edited flavors as Kodiak changed the name from Ice to Mint.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.52.216 (talk) 19:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kodiak Ice Name Change

message: This article does not conform to NPOV or contain sufficient citations:
*References to nicotine levels is needed
*References for addiction claims needed
*Citations for comparison to Copenhagen needed
I'm one addicted mother fucker! --Pchoate 21:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the previous AfD nomination, various Wikipedians contributed and fixed the POV issues & added citations. Your issues with the article should be fixed now, Pchoate.  --'oac' (old american century) | Talk 23:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issues

message: After dipping copenhagen for 10 years, I switched to KODIAK ICE, and now that ive dipped that for 7 years yall have decided to quit making it. I havent found anything out there that even comes close to the flavor or satisfaction that kodiak ice gives. Ive gone through every brand out there and not even skoal edge come close. If there is any way possible to let me know if there are any cans left, no matter where they are, let me know so ican buy them or bring kodiak ice back into circulation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.84.13.150 (talk) 21:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  KODIAK ICE SNUFF 

message: Reference number 3 no longer exists. Just bringing the issue to light. 74.124.184.183 (talk) 20:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Rot 
Talk:Anubal

message: this page is rubish. the figure is Ethal Anubal. His wife was Sid Uamuin. The stub says that he was married to Ethal. !? did the author confuse the name with the modern girls name ethal? Ethal Anubal was certainly not married to his first name. Fergus mac Róich 21:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Group (military unit)

message: Can anybody find out how the organization of the Royal Air Force is the opposite of that of the French and American Air Forces? It must have started during the First World War (during which the Americans had no independent air force, and no warplanes of their own design). 
4.154.232.161 (talk) 01:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did this happen? 

message: In this edit, the bulleted "two forms" were separated by an intervening paragraph, such that it no longer makes sense.  It might take on fixing it later in nobody else does.  There's also a mass of over-capitalization of ranks in there, and the odd and unhelpful slashed alternatives. Dicklyon (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead manglement
Talk:Tygart

message: I'd like to get a page started about the surname Tygart. The problem is I have no info. Does anyone with more info want to work on it with me? I'd love to collaborate and find out some more about this name. Technically, I'm not even sure if surname pages are appropriate for Wikipedia. Anyone who wants to talk me about it can leave me a message on my talk page. Tygartl1 21:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caer Ibormeith

message: the article states that her parents were Ethal and Anubal. This is ridiculous; her father's name was Ethal Anubal and her home was called Sid Uamuin. If there are no objections, I'm going to correct it before it results in more confusion. Fergus mac Róich 21:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: As I understand, "Caer" in Celtic and Welsh very roughly approximates to "Castle".  So "Caer Arianrhod would refer mean "Castle Arianrhod".  Does this apply in Irish as well or is the "Caer" in "Caer Ibormeith" being used in a different context?  Or does "Caer Ibormeith" mean "Castle Ibormeith"?  24.84.218.226 (talk) 05:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of "Caer"
Talk:Joë Bousquet

message: These two articles should be merged.  This should be an easy fix. - NYArtsnWords 21:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Deleuze 01:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Joe Bousquet]]
Talk:Gilbert de Beauregard Robinson

message: ==Untitled==
An editor has expressed a concern that the subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline for Biographies.
If you are familiar with the subject matter, please expand the article to establish its notability, citing reliable sources. If notability cannot be established, the article is more likely to be considered for deletion, as per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. (See also Wikipedia:Notability)''
==Notability==
The Notability issue is a GUIDELINE...
It is hard to see how this man does not constitute a notable subject despite the fact that there are not many internet sources on him!?
M.B.E. recipient
President of Canadian Mathematics Society
Authour of numerous papers...
Founder of various organisations.
(Did you actually read the article!?)
The one present source is authoritative and should alone permit the article to remain.
:Robinson is one of the founding father of Algebraic Combinatorics.  Keep. Mhym 23:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Notable?

message: The Notability issue is a GUIDELINE...
It is hard to see how this man does not constitute a notable subject despite the fact that there are not many internet sources on him!?
M.B.E. recipient
President of Canadian Mathematics Society
Authour of numerous papers...
Founder of various organisations.
(Did you actually read the article!?)
The one present source is authoritative and should alone permit the article to remain.
:Robinson is one of the founding father of Algebraic Combinatorics.  Keep. Mhym 23:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Even I, a chemist, know of him, don't delete this article --P.wormer 10:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Robinson
Talk:Rudy Dewclaw

message: I don't know... I've just never seen Rudy as an anti-hero. Anyone else Debate that line? --I80and 21:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-hero 

message: This article needs references before it can be moved up to class C, even though it is otherwise substantial. GreenReaper (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs required
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rat235478683

message: User:Rat235478683
Mainspace	184
Talk:	89
User talk:	32
User:	107
Wikipedia:	11
avg edits per article	3.30
earliest	19:46, 31 May 2006
number of unique articles	128
total	423
Rat235478683's editcount summary stats as of 21:22, November 30th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 21:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Takaful

message: "Wakalah Model" is referred to but no explanation given!
There is a need to better explain the key concepts.  In its current form, the article appears to be (perhaps unintentionally) an advertisement for a specific book as it uses numerous direct quotes and does not present other views.  More detailed and balanced description is needed!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Relay11 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a spelling issue; Wakala redirects to Islamic banking.--Miniapolis (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wakalah Model

message: An anonymous editor (119.148.3.14)  has tagged the Criticism section POV. Can't protest the self-published sources tag, but Mohammad Najatuallah Siddiqui is quite renowned and   Muhammad Akram Khan is a former Deputy Auditor General of Pakistan. They certainly should be WP:RS. -BoogaLouie (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag
Talk:Policy Innovations

message: All edits by User:RMcKenzie involve adding links to this magazine. Staff Directory lists "Rushaine McKenzie, GPI Global Internship." This article appears to be PROD and all edits by this user a violation of WP:EL. Clearly a conflict of interest. Jokestress 21:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link spamming (2006)

message: This article was made into a redirect some three years ago following an AfD with a bare minimum participation. I believe much of the incentive to have this deleted was related to a bout of link spamming that had been ongoing at that time for about a couple of years by the creator of this article among others. This particular editor editor, , had stopped editing Wikipedia five months prior to both the AfD and the link to the magazine's website being blacklisted. I have now also requested that the blacklisting be lifted. __meco (talk) 20:58, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally the website has been removed from the blacklist. __meco (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreating this article
Talk:Burdock (Dragon Ball)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested.  ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  02:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Burdock (Dragon Ball) →  – current article title Raymond1922 (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 March 2023
Talk:Asian openbill

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Anastomus oscitans - Bueng Boraphet.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 3, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-05-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Anastomus oscitans - Bueng Boraphet.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: I realize that people now want "their" photo to be on the page but it might be good to temper such enthusiasm especially when a very large number of images exist on Wikimedia Commons and a small subset needs to be picked for the article. User:مجتبیٰ insists on using :File:Asian_openbill_or_Asian_openbill_stork.jpg which shows an immature (not lack of bill gap) in flight rather than the older one :File:Asian Openbill In Flight Habitat Kolkata Outskirt West Bengal India 09.09.2014.jpg which shows the colours much better on an adult. As the main researcher who put in the text I have taken some effort to make the choice of the images but would be happy to have the rationale for a change so that it improves the article rather than reduce it as this image does. Shyamal (talk) 03:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Shyamal, :File:Asian_openbill_or_Asian_openbill_stork.jpg, is looking more better–– مجتبیٰ  (Talk!) 03:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: User:مجتبیٰ Please decide on the basis of encylopaedic value - read the article and see the concepts that are being illustrated and make the same decision. If it is just a bird in flight that you find pretty please see :commons:Category:Anastomus_oscitans_in_flight and :commons:Category:Anastomus_oscitans shows how many images exist for a choice-hopefully a rational one based on encyclopaedic knowledge on the subject. Shyamal (talk) 03:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image choice

message: 24.242.20.11 (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2020
Talk:Essen Hauptbahnhof

message: Why isn't the Essen Hauptbahnhof barrier-free? --88.78.1.217 (talk) 22:41, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not barrier-free? 

message: How many freight elevators has the Essen Hauptbahnhof? --88.76.231.202 (talk) 10:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevators 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kaiserslautern Central Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Aythya

message: The photo under "lesser scaup" is one of a greater scaup. 188.74.64.13 (talk) 09:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong photo 

message: Big time. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA needed
Talk:Girl Guides Australia

message: This article was created as an exact copy of "Guides Australia". It is actaully the correct name so I deleted it to make way for a move and then moved "Guides Australia" here. --Bduke (talk) 00:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please look at a proposal at Talk:Scouting and Guiding in Australia#State and Territory articles and comment there. --Bduke  (Discussion) 21:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: States and Territories
Talk:Black-browed albatross

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Thalassarche melanophrys - SE Tasmania.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 18, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-06-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Thalassarche melanophrys - SE Tasmania.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: The bird has been reported again at Bempton Cliffs 29. March 2022 2A02:C7E:EF4:9800:F1A9:F9BD:2864:A2C5 (talk) 07:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sighting
Talk:Black-throated loon

message: The article says that the black throated loon is a vagrant to Pakistan. While it would certainly be a vagrant if one were found in Pakistan, there needs to be a source validating this baseless claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.213.54 (talk) 03:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Rasmussen and Anderton (2005) The Ripley Guide - notes a record from Ambala in Indian Punjab. The article certainly needs to be improved. Shyamal (talk) 07:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vagrant to Pakistan? 

message: Wouldn't it be better to move this article to Arctic Loon? I think that is what it is more widespreadly called.Aythya affinis (talk) 17:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the name should either be Black-throated diver or Arctic Loon. However, the IOC use Black-throated loon and for bird names Wikipedia follows the IOC. As this species is predominantly Eurasian and marginally North American, Arctic Loon should not be used.Quetzal1964 (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Maqbool Butt

message: The correct name is "Bhat", not "Butt". Which must have been someone's idea of a joke. So funny I forgot to laugh, that's for sure. Anyway, I merged this information into the other article, fixed it up some, and am making this a redirect. --Ebyabe 22:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merging into ''Maqbool Bhat''
Talk:Black eagle

message: I spotted it somewhere at Fraser's Hill, Malaysia. I still could not believe how big it is. __earth (Talk) 11:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had one fly over me in Sri Lanka - the all-black plumage and wing shape make it look even bigger, Jimfbleak 14:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I saw it and it is huge! 
Talk:Blue-black grassquit

message: I have information that an immature blue-black grassquit (Volatinia jacarina) was observed July 30, 2018, in Santa Clara county, California, specifically in San Jose.  That it was reported in a metropolitan area of a city would give credence to its being regarded as not being of natural occurrence and is an escape.  This would supplement the information about its distribution in the article. db-user  db-user (talk) 22:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record of escape in California.
Talk:1903 Danish Folketing election

message: I presume this table refers to the Folketing elections. Do we have the similar results for the other House, Landstinget as well? Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 22:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replied on Talk:Danish parliamentary election, 1901. Hemmingsen 19:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Landsting results needed
Talk:Blue-winged kookaburra

message: Fledgling male kookaburras have tails similar in colour to the females. The blue coloration spreads gradually down the tail during the first year.
I would like to add the word "adult" to the first paragraph's description of tail colour, i.e. blue in adult males. Similarly, in the later description. Skythrops (talk) 22:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tail coloration & references