lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Japan Football Association

message: I think it's better to only keep the tournaments organized by JFA in the article. J.League tournaments like the J.LEAGUE/Sudamericana tournament, J1, J2, J3, J.League Cup, etc, and some friendly tournaments are not organized by JFA, so i don't think these kind of tournaments should be included in the article as it refers to the JFA, and should be only referring to JFA-run tournaments. ~~ Skydream1721 (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's a bit much here. -Koppapa (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Sorry... right···. JFA tournaments, records only. Could you fix them? I'm sorry for being selfish. I thought that if I collected links here, I would be able to update the article. I would like to have it removed. Thank you. A valid opinion. BRICK93 (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About J.League
Talk:Obata Masamori

message: Obata Masamori is not Obata Nobusada. Even if both served Shingen and Katsuyori, Masamori (died in 1582) is from the Kai branch of the familiy, whereas Nobusada (died in 1592) is from Kosuke branch. 
see the japanese articles.
user:lemecquisaitrien   — Preceding undated comment added 00:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the same as Nobusada
Talk:Football in Japan

message: Shouldn't this be at Soccer in Japan? The sport is most commonly referred to as "soccer" and not "football" within Japan and it's the namespace used at the Japanese Wikipedia.--Remurmur (talk) 21:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But then the national governing body is the JFA - The Japan Football Association. I think this is fine aｓ it is. :) --Lets Enjoy Life (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not Association Football in Japan? Alacrity25 (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Point of view much, you guys?
It isn't. North Korea still follows the Communist system. China also does because the women's game isn't professionalized. Surge79uwf (talk) 05:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Communist sports machines
Talk:Garret Crossman

message: So... is it Garrett or Garret?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.116.158 (talk) 04:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Japan women's national football team

message: I'd be willing to take care of the language, if someone else can take care of the content. wintersmith (talk) 13:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned up the language.Haberstr (talk) 19:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs cleanup badly.

message: Is there a good source for that? Like a link to official site or so? Or is this original research based on several stats sites? -Koppapa (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Most capped

message: The crest should have a yellow star over it. If anyone knows how to add that, that'd be great. Tad Lincoln (talk) 04:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star 

message: I proposed that we delete the FIFA rankings section. Historical FIFA rankings information is already included in the infobox. An entire dedicated section is impractical and redundant. Mightytotems (talk) 14:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing the section now. Mightytotems (talk) 12:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA rankings section 

message: Hello can someone fix this article. It seems something is wrong with it. I tried to revert myself edits from other IP users, in the case it was vandalized. But still have some kind of error, most likely to be on a table. --64.237.228.9 (talk) 01:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct this!
Talk:Prince Kūhiō Day

message: HAWAII  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.235.133.21 (talk) 07:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

message: You haven't even a word about the big Scheme bug? IKhitron (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scheme programming language 

message: I understand "Kingdom of Hawaiʻi", but there is no "state of Hawaiʻi" according to the Wiki article.  Has it been changed?  The wiki article should be edited.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hawaii
Talk:Wellington Cable Car

message: The Cable Car Museum website (Early Beginnings) says the original system was 785m long and rises 119m (390 ft) with a grade of 1 in 5.1. 
The article has length of 612m/track 628m, and a rise of 120m. 
The travel of the cars (612m) will be less than the length of track (628m), with the track at each end. But has the system shortened from 785m, or does this length include extra track to the Workshop for car maintenance? Hugo999 00:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Distances

message: Removed line referring to death: 
  On 24 February 1909, John William Wakelin, aged 30, was accidentally killed by the tram.
The reference at https://billiongraves.com/grave/John-William-Wakelin/11575420 states:
  Beloved husband of
  May Constance
  who was accidently
  killed by Wellington Tram
There's no evidence the Cable Car was involved, as there were many other trams in Wellington by 1909 2407:7000:AA16:A600:ECDC:564B:2C77:1611 (talk) 09:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged death
Talk:Opisthosoma

message: whats inside?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.11.179.234 (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: whats inside?

message: This article could benefit from some sample pictures or sketches. --Sarefo 01:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Can someone translate some of it into plainer plain English, please? Julia Rossi 02:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plainer English?
Talk:Epigyne

message: Much of the text of this article, as of June 2009, is taken from or paraphrased from The Spider Book by John Henry Comstock. Although first published in 1912, this book was considered a seminal work for decades and was reprinted as recently as 1975. I've updated all of the taxons used in the text, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to know if other parts need to be updated as well. Feel free to update anything in the article that seems out of date. Kaldari (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text imported from ''The Spider Book''
Talk:Hotelling Effect

message: An anonymous IP added this article quite a while ago. The IP has made 2 contributions (both, long ago). If it won't ever be more than a stub, it should probably be used to fill in a section in Supply and demand. Xaxafrad 01:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd copy it over myself and then list this article on AfD, but I'm not that bold. If the text here is condensed/summarized (in other words, 2 or 3 encylopedic sentences rather than 1 paragraph from a C-grade high school economics report), it probably doesn't say anything that isn't said elsewhere (but in case it does, I'd like a second opinion). Xaxafrad 03:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is AfD or redirect preferable? Xaxafrad 03:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge this stub elsewhere
Talk:Arachnology

message: I have no idea who Rick West is, but this should very probably be replaced by a list of important arachnologists, now and then. --Sarefo 01:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arachnologists

message: I just added 13 more scientific arachnological societies to that section.  (and 2 tarantula societies) Do I need to cite my sources for these?  I assumed not, since they can be located with simple searches, but I thought I should ask, since I am new to editing.  My main sources for these additions were pages from the International Society of Arachnology and British Society of Arachnology websites, but I also verified most of them by going to their official pages. I do not yet know how to cite sources on the Wiki pages, but if they should be added, I can search out the instructions. Please provide feedback. Thanks.  --The Spider Chick (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added several arachnological societies - do I need to add a source?
Talk:Merle Randall

message: Lewis and Randall is one of the most referenced historical sources in thermodynamics; it is hard to find biographical data on Randall, hence I put in what I know so far.  The page still needs more work.  I ordered a copy of their 1923 book; when I get it, it may have some bio-data in it?  Please help if you know about Randall.  Thanks:--Sadi Carnot 01:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page needs more work

message: Various sources give Randall's date of death as 1950 , and as far as I can see, there was only the one book called "Thermodynamics" -- the 1961 book appears to be a reprint of the 1923 book.
-- The Anome 16:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed date of book
Talk:World Board (World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts)

message: I note that (a) the name isn't specific to WAGGGS and (b) it is relatively new (before the mid to late 1990s it was called the World Committee (and possibly at some time World Bureau).   I suggest changing the name to  World Board (WAGGGS)--Erp 00:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Ant mimicry

message: These are genera of jumping spiders that are ant mimics. Might be useful for fleshing out the spider section: Myrmarachne, Sarinda, Peckhamia, Toxeus, Martella, Leptorchestes, Synemosyna, Synageles, Diolenius, Fluda, Erica, Panachraesta, Eburneana, Myrmage, Myrmagua, Myrmanu, Myrmapana, Myrmapeni, Myrmaplata, Myrmatheca, Myrmele, Zuniga, Parafluda, Corcovetella, Simprulla, Uluella. Weak ant mimics: Cosmophasis, Paradamoetas, Tutelina. Nosferattus (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there are large numbers of ant mimics in many of the groups named, and quite a lot of others too (even snails...). Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ant mimicking jumping spiders 

message: This article has grown by accretion over the years, forming a random procession of examples with little structure. Worse, the structure isn't correct, as spiders (for instance) may be Batesian or aggressive mimics of ants, so the attempt to categorise taxa by type of mimicry isn't going to work. Further, there are actually thousands of ant mimics so we should not give prominence to taxa other than as examples explicitly from a large field. Therefore, the article's main structure should be about the types of mimicry involved, and we can give a very rough idea of some of the taxa that employ each type. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Some time ago (probably smth like a month ago) there was a discussion pending on pl wiki. One of the reviewers suggested some changes which might be applicable even to the original. Here is the link: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiprojekt:Czy_wiesz/propozycje/2024-02/Myrmekomorfia
Yes, I know it's all in Polish, that's why I suggest using an auto-translation tool, such as Google Translator, which might get you even more than a brief overview about what's happened there and what was suggested.
By the way - nice work with the expansion :)
Regards, Karol739 (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pl wiki discussion on this article's translation
Talk:Types of spiders

message: ==Untitled==
Is it necessary to put how dangerous each spider is to humans in brackets?  Is this an article about spiders or about their relationship specifically to humans?  I think it would look a lot better and more legitimate if the dangerous level of the spiders in relation to humans was removed. - owheelj
== Tone ==
This looks pretty good, except for using things like 'burly-looking', "yuck!" spiders, 'ferocious' appearance, etc. These make the article seem unencyclopedic.
Also, the danger ratings (see above) are pointless. 99DBSIMLR 17:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dangerous

message: This looks pretty good, except for using things like 'burly-looking', "yuck!" spiders, 'ferocious' appearance, etc. These make the article seem unencyclopedic.
Also, the danger ratings (see above) are pointless. 99DBSIMLR 17:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: I eddited the article a little bit and decided to change the name to List of types of spiders. It has been rediected accordingly.99DBSIMLR 15:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Talk:Magna

message: Looking for a second opinion, here -- it looks like there's a lot of WP:PTM here.  How many of the place names in England, for example, would just be known as "Magna"? Magna Pacific?  Villa Magna Condominiums?  Magna Vista High School?--NapoliRoma (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not a lot of commentary on this, but the question remains. Unless someone has a valid objection, I'm going to go all PTM on this, probably in less than five years this time.  No promises, though.--NapoliRoma (talk) 03:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit of prework: I took a look at the articles for all the English place names listed, and it appears all but one of them would be known by their unmodified name if not the name that includes "Magna".  The one exception would be Magna Carvetiorum.--NapoliRoma (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial title match infestation?
Talk:Missulena

message: I am Re-posting this talk note in its own new section and adding to it. 
In the second paragraph: "however, recorded envenomings by this spider are rare." This sounds awkward and odd. 
I have never seen the word "envenomings" used when referring to spider bites. Ever. In my opinion, and from 20 years of experience, it should be "envenomations", or even just simply "bites". 
I thought perhaps this was a UK or AU usage for the word, but I checked the 2 references for this section (#4 & #5) and that term is not used. #5 uses the term "envenomation" twice. Considering this is an Australian species, I checked several other AU based sites with info on Mouse Spiders and did not find the word "envenoming" used anywhere.
I think it would be wise to change the sentence to this: "however, recorded bites by this spider are rare, despite the abundance of some species amid human habitation." (or at the very least, change "envenomings" to "bites" in the existing text.) 
Using the term "envenomations" would be fine, but it appears that some bites do not result in envenomation at all, meaning no venom is transferred to the victim, they are dry bites. Therefore, saying that people rarely get bitten by these spiders, (even though many are found in human populated areas) it is actually more informative. The Spider Chick (talk) 06:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The same word, "envenomings" is used further in the article, under the heading Medical Significance: "However, serious envenomings are relatively rare; most mouse spider bites documented in the medical literature...".  I suggest that "envenomings" be changed to "envenomations" in this sentence as well, for all the same reasons I've noted above.  --The Spider Chick (talk) 06:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If I don't see any feedback on this in the next month, I will go ahead and figure out how to make these proposed changes directly to the article and will do it myself. --The Spider Chick (talk) 06:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  see this article. I think that "envenoming" is used in some more scientific/technical publications, but this is a general encyclopedia, so go ahead and make the changes you suggest. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "envenomings" is not a term used for spiders
Talk:Ben L. Salomon

message: I don't think "ben" was his actual name. At least one of the external links gives it as "Benjamin" (which is quitemor likely, considering he was jewish). Is thereany way to find out his middle name? Circeus 20:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Benjamin Lewis, per the White House and other sources. The article should probably be at Ben Salomon. --Dhartung | Talk 05:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Full name?

message: Yeesh, another badly-munged image from the MoH fansite, and this one looks like he's coming out of hyperspace or possibly shining at us from heaven. Anyone want to remove that psychedelic background? --Dhartung | Talk 05:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I looked for a citation for the anti-semitic claim but I couldn't find any...all of the combinations of 'ben salomon' or 'ben l. salomon' and 'anti-semitism' or 'anti-semitic' that are google indexed seem to be from this wikipedia page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by S.Buckly (talk • contribs) 21:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: anti-semitism?

message: i don't think their is a Clear way to tell if he had any children, siblings, or unkles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moki man (talk • contribs) 01:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Salomon was an only child and was single. Schazjmd (talk) 15:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family?
Talk:List of people in the Warsaw Uprising

message: List of noteworthy individuals in the Warsaw Uprising page looks decent, with the exception of the "Allied Politicians". The later is full of negative polemic observations with nothing to back them up. No such commentary appears in the "German" section, the primary perpetrators of the action. Appears to be editorial bias at work. -- RJH 20:08, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: ::–Comment moved from Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Military -R. S. Shaw 01:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vitas Gerulaitis

message: This  nytimes link suggests it was Connors that Gerulaitis beat after a streak of losses, not Borg. Does anyone know for sure? --Gargletheape 02:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, the official ATP tour homepage  says Vitas has only ever beaten Borg by walkover. Will change the article back to say Connors in a bit, unless someone has something to add. --Gargletheape 02:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, right now the article claims he was 0-16 against Borg, yet includes a quotation suggesting that he defeated Borg at least once.  Which was it? Wencer 05:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone who's not a registered user just changed it to Borg giving no reasons. Changed it back. Can anyone who thinks it should be Borg after all please give SOME reasons on the talk page? --Gargletheape 05:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Connors or Borg?
Talk:Spruce-fir moss spider

message: Hello I am a college student working on the WikiSpiders project and wanted to include some constructive feedback. This is for a Behavioral Ecology course, so many of the suggestions will be surrounding behavior.
Some strengths of this article are that it is sectioned off very well for each topic. This organized structure helps the reader pinpoint information easily, as talked about in the Good Article features. Even more so, the lead is very concise and provides information that follows the Wiki Spiders description. It also describes its endangered status very well, linking to the cause and events that lead to its endangerment. Three general categories that could be included are reproduction and life cycle, mating, and protective coloration and behavior. Reproduction and life cycle would include information regarding fertilization, brood size, molting and life span. Understanding reproduction can help synthesize the survival choices of the spider to best utilize its resources. Brood size and life span tend to be related in governing an individual’s behavior. If a spider has a small life span, it likely has a large brood size to be able to ensure that its genes spread.  Mating is another missing section that should be included in this Wikipedia article. Information on mate searching behavior and gendered interactions can be linked to genetic polymorphisms. Listing these interactions can provide a robust knowledge of the spider’s techniques and may also give rise to a better genetic understanding. Lastly, a section dedicated to protective coloration and behavior should be added because the article begins to describe the colorings of this spider but should elaborate on why these colors are beneficial and what kind of survival advantage it gives the species. Per the Talk page, this article has been rated “Start” and of “Low” importance. This article has room for improvement; however, it is a highly specific spider that is lesser-known. I think that given the endangered state of this spider, it should be of more importance. Akwan826 (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: this is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit and there are few active spider editors to respond to your suggestions. So feel free to add to the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions from a Student 

message: — Assignment last updated by Eguiamot (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Genetics
Talk:Danny Thorpe

message: I think Danny is an outstanding programmer and consider him a friend, but I'm not sure he really meets notability guidelines for biographies. Comments? --Craig Stuntz 02:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Craig, long time no chat :-). I'd say it's borderline. Danny is a published author and has played a major historical role in Delphi and Kylix. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimmytharpe (talk • contribs) 13:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable
Talk:Flat iron steak

message: chuck tender -
this is a completly different muscle, more commonly known as the Mock Tender.  It is commonly butterflied, but a flatiron is not.  The true name of the muscle that the Flatiron is cut from is called the Top Blade.  Also, this is not an entirly new steak, the French have used it for ages, calling it paleron  The value cuts program, instituted by the NCA, based on the reasearch carried out at the two schools mentioned have mearly popularized this cut in the US.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.207.80.248 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chuck tender

message: The links to every single University of Florida department are burdensome and irrelevant, and should be removed.  It is appropriate to note that the Flat Iron steak was developed in part by Univ of Florida researchers.  It is non-sense to include links to the department of denistry, the library, the campus radio station, etc.  This is an article about a steak. 67.107.106.27 (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Florida 

message: The claim that this steak is not tender is based on opinion, not fact.  Beef tenderness is a scientifically varifiable standard based on the shear force machine.  See: http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/54380530/protocols/ShearForceProcedures.pdf
I believe someone needs to find the USDA ranking of tenderness and utalize this.  This article is, in my opinion, appauling in its amount of opinion and lack of fact.  The French cut was from the same blade, but is not the same cut, this can be verified.  Someone needs to take the time to do this.  The opinions needs to be left out. -Matt-  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.157.94 (talk) 01:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not tender 

message: There is a tag suggesting that beef clod be merged here, but that cut is across the connective tissue, more like top blade steak than flat iron. I'm going to move the suggested merge there. --Kaz (talk) 14:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beef Clod is NOT Flat Iron 

message: I removed the following external links because they are inappropriate. They could be used as sources perhaps:
* 
* 
Jojalozzo 19:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate external links 

message: Can someone review The Cut section? It's good info, but refers mainly to top blade steak, from which the flat iron cut is derived. It may be fine as-is, but I feel it could be worked into the article better, I'm just not sure about the best way to go about dong so.Tengu99 (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cut Section Review Needed