lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Minutemen

message: The paragraph mentioning Sint Eustatius is very hard to follow and its tone is not encyclopedic. 
*It implies that the Minutemen were a monolithic organization, well acquainted with world politics and involved in international trade.
*That governors were appointed in 1689 seems out of context.
*The sentence "The people of an island controlled by the Dutch, Sint Eustatius, decided they had had enough with the British being the major power and having its hand grasping over the entire world" does not belong in an encyclopedia. Closer to the facts would be this sentence from the entry for the island Sint Eustatius: "Since the island sold arms and ammunition to anyone willing to pay, it was one of the few places from which the rebellious British Thirteen Colonies of North America could obtain weaponry."  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint_Eustatius#.22First_Salute.22 Cwrwgar (talk) 10:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sint Eustatius

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:UMass Minutemen and Minutewomen -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: {{noredirect|Massachusetts Minutemen and Minutewomen}}

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:Boston Minutemen for the discussion -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: {{noredirect|Boston Minutemen}}

message: This article is not worthy of Wikipedia. It should be deleted or completely rewritten.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwrwgar (talk • contribs) 18:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete or rewrite 

message: the mark remand  people for citations adding in November 2007
seem pointless to keep since the maintenance have been done
phoenix 2015-11
36.225.99.244 (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: I see whole sections that have zero inline citations. If they are sourced from any sources already listed, it should be easy-peasy to add cites. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2015
Talk:Warren Fitzgerald

message: The first draft of this article was submitted by an anonymous user from an IP address that has been associated recently with a very high rate of vandalism.  Can anyone confirm the contents and notability of this article?  Rossami (talk) 15:11, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Warren Fitzgerald is a large contributor to "The Aquabats Super Show" , as musician , song writer ,producer ,  occasional story contributor , and even the odd acting roll. ( Confirmation easily found on the IMDB. ) 75.104.163.28 (talk) 22:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Association with The Aquabats!
Talk:Input impedance

message: shouldn't this be referenced somewhere in the text?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.206.44 (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  simple source and load circuit 

message: This hardly explains the concept of impedance. I would put it there myself but i don't know what it is.
freshmaniac (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not very useful page 

message: This article uses recursive language and so will be very difficult to comprehend. In other words it tries to explain things in terms of the very things it is trying to explain. Perhaps it can re-written?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edith Smitters (talk • contribs) 02:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Editing or New Contributions Required
Talk:Crackling

message: What exactly is the relationship between cracklins and cracklings?  — Pekinensis 15:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: From reading the articles I'd say that cracklins are made with skin still attached to them, while cracklings aren't. Of course, it may be that the articles are about the same thing. Nikola 22:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think they're the same thing and need to be merged into a section at pork rind. Other regional variants of pork rinds are listed there already. Jokermage "Timor Mentum Occidit" 05:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Go ahead and merge. Kerowyn 23:51, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No way.  Pork rinds are pieces fried pork skin sold in bags in convenience stores, and cracklings are skin with the fat/meat still attached, usually served warm and freshly fried.  Whoever suggested this needs should take a trip to Louisiana.
They are the same thing just a name difference. I do miss them though as they are the best part of a joint.
I'm for a merge, and I also added the Pork scratchings article as a merge with Pork rinds. My full rationale can be found on that page's talk page. - dharmabum 09:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: "crackling" is also a very common name for upgraded "Zerglings". Perhaps a disambig is in order? EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query
Talk:P-Celtic and Q-Celtic languages

message: I strongly feel that this page and Q-Celtic should redirect to Celtic languages or else be expanded, rewritten, and ideally moved to "P-Celtic hypothesis". It's at Celtic languages that there have been discussions and edit wars concerning the P-Celtic hypothesis versus the Insular Celtic hypothesis – both of which have academic support. P-Celtic is not synonymous with Brythonic, because P-Celtic includes Gaulish; and Q-Celtic is not synonymous with Goidelic, because Q-Celtic includes Lepontic and Celtiberian... Oh, lord, I feel like I'm just repeating myself. The article Celtic languages just isn't big enough to merit being broken up into all these smaller articles yet. QuartierLatin1968 15:42, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody has objected, so I'll do it. Biscuittin 22:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have split out Q-Celtic hypothesis/ P-Celtic hypothesis into brief articles that redirect back to Celtic languages. I have used only information from that page. Lucian Sunday (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this last point. It is a fact, not a hypothesis, that some of these languages use p/b where others use q/c, and if the terminology is intended only to describe this (which is how I would use it), and not to imply a stemma reconstruction, it is uncontroversial. (In this sense it is rather like Italo-Celtic, which can be highly controversial or entirely uncontroversial depending on whether it is linked to a stemma hypothesis or is merely understood typologically.) Incidentally, I would have spelled this with lower case letters: p-Celtic and q-Celtic.  --Doric Loon (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: P-Celtic/Q-Celtic hypothesis
Talk:Q-Celtic hypothesis

message: I strongly feel that this page and P-Celtic should redirect to Celtic languages or else be expanded, rewritten, and ideally moved to "P-Celtic hypothesis". It's at Celtic languages that there have been discussions and edit wars concerning the P-Celtic hypothesis versus the Insular Celtic hypothesis – both of which have academic support. P-Celtic is not synonymous with Brythonic, because P-Celtic includes Gaulish; and Q-Celtic is not synonymous with Goidelic, because Q-Celtic includes Lepontic and Celtiberian... The article Celtic languages just isn't big enough to merit being broken up into all these smaller articles yet. QuartierLatin1968 15:44, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody has objected, so I'll do it. Biscuittin 22:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I have split out Q-Celtic hypothesis/ P-Celtic hypothesis into brief articles that redirect back to Celtic languages. I have used only information from that page. Lucian Sunday (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: P-Celtic/Q-Celtic hypothesis
Talk:Stabbing

message: What exactly do Turkish people have to do with stabbing? 
--98.216.108.171 (talk) 02:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also:

message: "To defeat this defense and increase the likelihood of delivering a fatal stab wound, weapons engineers developed the blood groove, an elongated concave depression in a metal blade, to help open the wound and allow blood to flow more freely. The blood groove was added to the sword, bayonet, and other warrior weapons, and remains a common feature of stabbing weapons today such as the American M9 Bayonet."
The fuller article contradicts this.
TaintedMustard 15:46, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.--Joel 21:52, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To

message: How come a toothpick figures in the list of common stabbing objects? Shouldn't we list it in the accidental stabbings? I doubt that the pencil belongs in this category as well. However, a fork is definitely an object used for stabbing and its absence is strange. Boron eye (talk) 09:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Toothpick

message: I would really like to see Template:violence against people included here. Stabbing is a form of that. I mean yeah I guess you can stab non-people too (like a slab of beef, or a cow) but it is a major form of violence against humans too. Ranze (talk) 17:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Template inclusion

message: There were many pornographic videos in which some woman gets multiple stab wounds and even receives knives with extremely lethal melee weapons and receives stab wounds to death and even dies as a victim of qualified homicide in the filming of the video, but it is not listed on Wikipedia. - 201.6.213.140 (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What? You mean like a snuff film? Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌵CCI guide  04:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the presence of stabbing in pornographic videos and films.
Talk:Kuhn poker

message: Is it really as simple as this? I can't see myself ever betting without the top card... the game might be more interesting with blinds or antes, raises, and whatnot... Evercat 16:08, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an ante --Henrygb 11:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: Would be great if the article could also outline this only winning strategy, instead of just stating the rules. --Pgallert (talk) 09:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what is the winning strategy? 

message: Do the players understand the composition of the deck?  Whether or not this factor is explained to them makes an enormous difference, as a player unaware that the only cards in the deck are J, Q, and K might be dealt K (unbeatable) and then incorrectly assume that the other player might hold an Ace, causing the player holding K to lose.  Or have I completely missed the point?  74.131.53.1 (talk) 19:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  So ....
Talk:Valkyrie Profile (disambiguation)

message: This is just a general heads up and a request. Anyone with detailed knowledge regarding the game's cast should probably take a look at the article Characters of Valkyrie Profile, which is linked through this article's Cast section. I'm doing my best to make it as detailed and accurate as I can, but there are more than likely some errors cropping up, and so if you have anything to add to it, feel free to help out.Hailinel 07:33, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: I've removed the following in my rewrite. It's good advice, but needlessly vacuously written and has little place in an overall description of the system. --Kizor 19:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Combat tip

message: I think Sakuraba Motoi the composer of music in Valkyrie Profile should be added into the article. 71.250.63.157 15:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: There is a homebrew (but very professional) fighting game based on Valkyrie Profile called Valkyrie Fight, and a sequal called Valkyrie Fight Tag.  I think there should be mention of it in the article.  Anybody have some good info? --ScarletSpiderDave 15:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valkyrie Fight 

message: There are a couple localization issues that are not covered in the article. For one, Belenus' recruitment scene had some vital information removed from it. There has been much discussion on the GameFAQs forums about this over the years. I have a topic on it saved in which someone [Ahjenta] sheds some additional details on the scene based on the Japanese PSP port. Basically Belenus' wife was Jealous of Asaka receiving more attention form Belenus than she. Thus she made a blood pact with Lady Beliza, the terms of which being she would give her own soul to Beliza if Beliza would take Asaka's soul.
Apparently when Lenneth checks the dresser at the end, she doesn't say "this means nothing to me" but rather finds the blood pact. Anyhow, this is a general paraphrase and I left some details out. I could contact the original author and see if we can have permission to use some of his translations.--Xerain 08:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Localization 

message: When was this revealed? Definitely not that I'm complaining, but I didn't hear anything about it, and I check all the best Square Enix sites I know everyday for new news86.133.233.15 17:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  VP:L & VP2:S European release
Talk:Coach Canada

message: Having been behind their buses on many occasions - its Trentway Wagar. --Dhodges 16:30, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two operators: TRW and Stagecoach/Gray Line Montreal, as noted in the template. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Gray Line Montreal is only a small part of Coach Canada operations and the parent article should also show the CC branded operations in Quebec, including the Gray Line tours. I created the Montreal spin off, but it now seems excessive considering similar articles for other divisions of Stagecoach which can included many operators. I will do the rewrite but I am just looking for an unbiased second opinion. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Adam, I hoped you would respond as you are one of the few people here that understand some of the complexity in the North American operations of Stagecoach. Just as you have grouped Coach USA into clusters of operators and regions, Coach Canada is really just another division of Coach USA, but they obviously had to use a different brand. The companies as outlined in the article operate Coach Canada branded buses and in addition in Montreal they operate the Gray Line franchise, which was inherited with the acquisition of Autocar Connaisseur. The difficulty is in outlining other funtions of the Connaisseur Group of which Gray Line is just a small part, just as Trentway-Wagar (NOT Coach Canada) also operates local transit and school bus services. Coach Canada is the brand at the top of the pyramid of divisional operations. I suspect that Gray Line New York was acquired in the same way. Is that worth a redirect to the operator and a small note in the article? -Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Should this not be mentioned?</br>
Coach Canada provides a weekly bus service between Peterborough and Havelock offered under Trentway-Wagar, with a scheduled stop in Hastings. http://www.coachcanada.com/coachcanada/ss.tickets.asp
Are their others?--User:Brenont (talk) 03:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another scheduled service 
Talk:Minnesota Legislature

message: Minnesota state legislative terms from 1857 through 2021 are in Wikidata. -- M2545 (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidata list
Wikipedia talk:Clinic for Wikipediholics

message: Please see this proposed new policy, which may be of interest to some wikipediholics. 205.217.105.2 16:43, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Block on demand]]

message: I almost thought that this was a joke, but some people really WERE addicted to Wikipedia. Others are just fooling around. — Stevey7788 (talk) 00:48, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is definitely NOT a joke. There are many true accounts of users going without a break for 24 hours. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: This page would be better if it were either serious (with some kind of encouragement / enforcement for people who choose to take a wikibreak) or purely humorous, but it seems to have been an unhelpful and unfunny mixture of the two for the last 18 years. - excarnateSojourner (talk|contrib) 18:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a joke or not?

message: What's wikipedihol and where can I get some? :-D --Aceizace 22:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipediholics? 

message: Is it just me or after trying to edit the top portion of the page and saving, does the text get added under the See also section? 
EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 15:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that, and fixed it when I added myself... - Adolphus79 00:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errrr...formatting 

message: I have developed these types:
*Bulimic therapy: Binge & then purge/edit lots & then abstain.
*Gradual therapy: This one needs an active sysop for enforcement of the agreement. A WikiTherapist tells him/her that they can only edit, say, 20 edits a day. The sysop enforces this by blocking after 20 edits have been reached until the next day.
Please reply on my talk page. LaleenaTalk to me  Contributions to Wikipedia 22:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinds of WikiTherapy 

message: Might I ask who's the doctor in this clinic?
Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no doctor. It's just a list of Wikipediholics. -217.147.38.100 (talk) 16:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Who? 

message: What does this page even do? It just lists wikipediholics,  but no help is given. I think we will need to delete it. I checked in, but no help is given. -217.147.38.100 (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Timeline of the English Reformation

message: This page needs a lot of work.  How can a timeline of the Reformation not mention Luther, Calvin, or Zwingli?  The English Reformation was obviously very important (and I am largely a product of its work), but golly...we really need to add more here.  KHM03 16:45, 11 May (UTC)
Yes, and it should not be arranged so as to indicate that the English Reformation begins and ends with Hank the 8th. Dan Knauss 19:02, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs work
Talk:Meme/Archive 2

message: What about adding Darwinian evolution to the list of memes? See Darwin's Dangerous Idea. gK ¿? 04:33, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Darwinian evolution as a meme?

message: Many of the concepts in meme apply to other articles, such as diffusion (anthropology) and diffusion of innovations. Those articles could be enriched through discussion of memes, comparison with diffusion, and explanation of how memes act as agents of diffusion. --Westendgirl 03:46, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of meme concepts in other articles
Talk:Kharaj

message: Here it says that Kharaj was levied not on Dhimmis but on recent converts to Islam;
, please state the source where it says that kharaj was levied on Dhimmis.Yuber(talk) 02:23, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's another source that states that Kharaj was required of all residents (not just jews/christians) Yuber(talk) 02:24, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Both links specifically state that the Kharaj was applied to recent converts to Islam as well as Dhimmis in the first century or two.  That means that it is NOT specific to dhimmis.  Later, it was applied to all peasants.  The distinction of Dhimmis cannot be made.Yuber(talk) 02:43, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention the tax was one of the factors that led downfall of the Ummayad dynasty, suggesting that Muslims did not like it either.Yuber(talk) 02:47, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

text: What, yet another article in which he can continually delete well-sourced information that doesn't agree with his POV, while simultaneously making claims of his own which simply don't match the sources provided?  That's an appealing thought. Jayjg (talk) 03:23, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Your own sources contradict your claims.Yuber(talk) 03:34, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you show me where, ok? Jayjg (talk) 03:56, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Kharaj and dhimmi

message: User:67.161.2.106 has removed the following text: 
:Ibn Warraq has described kharaj as discriminatory and oppressive in his book Why I Am Not A Muslim.
I will leave it to the experts to discuss whether this book is relevant to the article. --Aleph4 13:51, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Deletions without explanation are typically considered vandalism. Jayjg (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why I am not a Muslim

message: Thanks for your collaboration...--81.245.63.50 13:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who cantranlate into french language the text of the Wiki in french ? 

message: Dear , I invite you to ameliorate this article based on the accomplished work you made in the jizya article. Regards; 16:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, . That's certainly on my agenda. There are some problems in articles with higher page view counts I'd like to fix first, though. Eperoton (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to ameliorate this article
Talk:Witness (disambiguation)

message: Lots still to tidy up here, notably:
*Format is obviously inconsistent.
*Names of movies. Compare The Witness (1969 film) with Witness (1985 movie). The use or not of the article the in these titles is correct in both cases, the question is: Film or movie? There's probably a Wikiproject already looking at that, if not there should be. Or there may be a policy already.
*Redir should be avoided. I'll get to those. 
But, at least now we have a disambig page that points to the Harrison Ford movie! Neither did before. Andrewa 17:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was looking at the page of Jessica Simpson and if you click the link for "The Witness", which is an upcoming movie, it redirects to this disambiguation page.64.180.184.69 (talk) 06:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability/spam issues aside, disambiguation pages aren't web directories. Wenttomowameadow (talk) 13:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A movie link redirects here.