lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion/Log/Archives

message: What's the purpose of having an archive that logs both deleted and not deleted when we already have two consistently updated logs for both seperately? The 'main' archive seems a bit redundant to me.
Also, is it as complete as the seperate logs? -Frazzydee|✍ 15:51, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hasn't been used since December 2004.  Marking it as deprecated. -Frazzydee|✍ 14:46, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Logs

message: 
In an attempt to keep this from turning into the monstrosity that is Wikipedia:Archived delete debates, I've made a mockup of a full year's logs using the JanuaryCalendar2006Source etc. templates at User:Cryptic/sandbox4.  If we don't mind having all the redlinks, the excessively ugly wiki source can be avoided by transcluding directly, i.e.  and so on, which produces the calendar to the left.  (This also won't need updating whenever a page moves to the archives.)  Thoughts? —Cryptic (talk) 02:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support. --Adrian Buehlmann 13:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving daily subpages
Talk:Look at All the Love We Found

message: Does anyone know if this tracklist is exactly like the back cover??
I'm talking about if the joint perfomance AWOL One, Abstract Rude, Josh Fischel,Transducer is written right this way on the back cover?
Thanks if someone can answer
vddddvdvdvdvd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.186.129.10 (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Edgware (disambiguation)

message: I've tidied this page but I'm not at all sure a disambiguation page is needed at all. Edgware does not seem to be ambiguous and it is the only article linking here! Edgware Road may well be an area (in Edgware) as well as a road but that does not need disambiguating here. Edgeware (NZ) has a different spelling: it does not seem to be mentioned in Christchurch#List_of_Christchurch_suburbs but Google finds it. Lord Edgware, if anyone was bothered, would go in as such. Thincat 16:12, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 07-Jun-2006: The difference between Edgware Road and the Underground, Edgware Road tube station, is a valid concern.  Also, the title "Lord" might be omitted for "Lord Edgware" as another valid concern.  The issue is analogous to the term Lord Delamere: the man (also called "Delamere"), or the character in Out of Africa, or the pub/bar in the New Stanley Hotel in Nairobi, Kenya.  The more one knows, the more it matters.  Note that Enc. Britannica often lists several matching paragraphs because disambiguation occurs quite, quite often. Remember, Wikipedia contains only a very tiny, hollow, miniscule fraction of the common knowledge in the World.  -Wikid77 07:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Daenerys Targaryen

message: LuK3, I think that should be moved to the Reception section. The "General" subsection of the Reception section, which I had meaning to expand, needs more on the other seasons. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 19:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I have no problem with you moving it to the "Reaction" section. I think it actually works better in that section. --  LuK3  (Talk) 20:58, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Luk3. No need to ping me, by the way, since this page is on my watchlist. I didn't ping you because I know you watch it as well. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough! This article is looking good for a possible good article nomination in the near future. Do you happen to see major outstanding issues that needs to be addressed? --  LuK3  (Talk) 21:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered if you were preparing it for that. I don't think it's quite close to ready. For example, I noted that the "General" subsection of the Reception section needs more on the other seasons. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a problem, I'll continue to beef up the section and fix up references. --  LuK3  (Talk) 22:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Political leadership section
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Iasson

message: ===Related to Grunt's comments===
* Accept to determine current policy on accounts of this nature. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 02:04, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)
*:Public accounts? Present convention appears to be to lock them, c.f. any account listed on BugMeNot (these are locked on sight; I've yet to hear a word against doing so) and what happened when CheeseDreams gave her password away (the account was promptly locked). The rest appears to be plain sockpuppet abuse. I'm not sure there's a need for us to endorse policy to be written on that score. I've just added something like this to Wikipedia:Blocking policy, describing current practice and the reasons for it as best I could - David Gerard 21:38, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  .... unless he is honest enough to exchange public accounts in front of our eyes. In that case honesty should be punished, and only the persons who exchange their public accounts secretly are allowed to continue their job. Aeropus I of Macedon 13:04, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  hmm...let me object to what you just said. IMHPO, public accounts should be tolerated, but public accounts' advertisement should be prohibited. And this is what you are doing right now. Aeropus I of Macedon 13:32, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments moved from arbitrator's opinions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Iasson#Arbitrators.27_opinions_on_hearing_this_matter_.286.2F0.2F0.2F0.29] 

message: * Accept to determine current policy on accounts of this nature. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 02:04, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)
*:Public accounts? Present convention appears to be to lock them, c.f. any account listed on BugMeNot (these are locked on sight; I've yet to hear a word against doing so) and what happened when CheeseDreams gave her password away (the account was promptly locked). The rest appears to be plain sockpuppet abuse. I'm not sure there's a need for us to endorse policy to be written on that score. I've just added something like this to Wikipedia:Blocking policy, describing current practice and the reasons for it as best I could - David Gerard 21:38, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to Grunt's comments

message: *Accept to ratify current consensus behaviour toward public accounts. I'm not sure we can actually stop someone from setting them up, of course ... - David Gerard 12:24, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  .... unless he is honest enough to exchange public accounts in front of our eyes. In that case honesty should be punished, and only the persons who exchange their public accounts secretly are allowed to continue their job. Aeropus I of Macedon 13:04, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  hmm...let me object to what you just said. IMHPO, public accounts should be tolerated, but public accounts' advertisement should be prohibited. And this is what you are doing right now. Aeropus I of Macedon 13:32, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to David Gerard's comments

message: There is one on the proposed decision page, but nobody has apparently copied it here. Thryduulf 19:52, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary injunction
Template talk:Start box

message: == Lock this article? ==
Given that this particular template is used by thousands of articles and that it hasn't had a non-reverted edit in 6 months, and given that we've had two instances of vandalism in the past 24 hours, would it be worthwhile to lock this article?
— DLJessup (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done by me, a while ago... must have forgotten to mark this as done. Nihiltres(t.l) 00:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Given that this particular template is used by thousands of articles and that it hasn't had a non-reverted edit in 6 months, and given that we've had two instances of vandalism in the past 24 hours, would it be worthwhile to lock this article?
— DLJessup (talk) 20:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock this article? 

message: 
*Please add:

after the redirect link. Thanks // FrankB 15:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done by me, a while ago... must have forgotten to mark this as done. Nihiltres(t.l) 00:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Protect
Talk:José Figueres Ferrer

message: Can't believe he is such an unknown in the USA. Probably one of the greatest men of the 20th century.
70.209.47.236 (talk) 04:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: We need a picture of this Man

message: Looks like a tongue twister. But nevertheless the punctuation should be added. 
70.209.47.236 (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Needs Pronunciation of His Name

message: This section talks about Figueres receiving money from the communist party. The communist party was outlawed in the Costa Rica constitution of 1948, which is still in effect. Therefore this entire section cannot be true. Decaalv.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Decaalv (talk • contribs) 20:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Figueres connection with the KGB

message: If his last name is "Ferrer", why is he called by his middle name "Figueres" throughout the article? 70.20.171.242 (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Figueres/Ferrer

message: When did he marry Beck? RJFJR (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Second wife
Talk:Closed city

message: Other Aboriginal areas exist, but I couldn't get the grammar good enough to make an edit Brh418 (talk) 10:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia 

message: Someone reading the introduction would conclude that closed cities only exist in Russia. This paragraph needs to be globalised, or reduced, or moved to a different section. In addition, there are closed areas which are not cities. For example, Foulness Island in the UK (which is a how I arrived at this article) and “Area 51” in the US. I haven’t read this article fully, but wonder if the title is inaccurate. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia in para 2
Talk:Category 3 cable

message: What are the physical characteristics of Cat 3 cable?  Number of conductors, AWG, twists per inch, etc.?
Snottywong 17:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I was just wondering the same thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.71.37.182 (talk) 04:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Indeed. A pic would be nice, as well. I mean, if you compare this to the size of the Cat5 article... you see where i'm coming from, right? It might just be a matter of personal opinion, but I believe that similar articles should be similarly structured. By that logic, this article needs a structure more like the Cat5 article -- 84.172.25.164 (talk) 11:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Unlike CAT5 through 7 cables, CAT3 can have as few as 2 pairs to beyond 100 pairs. 4 & 25 pairs are the most commonly available.  2 pair cable, while still around, isn't as popular as it once was. Pictures of CAT3 cable can be found on the websites of manufacturers like Commscope/Systimax, General Cable & Superior Essex. As with CAT5E through 7, CAT3 cables can be either Riser or Plenum rated. 64.208.159.230 (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The category rating is about electrical performance. Things like crosstalk, frequency response, impedance. The higher categories have better performance. It is not about the number of pairs. The most common cables have 4 pairs. Larger cables are available for different category ratings. --Kvng (talk) 16:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Wire gauge? (thickness of each conductor?) dhollm (talk) 22:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Physical characteristics of Cat3

message: The article states that Cat 3 can be used for VoIP. VoIP is usually Ethernet. I'm sue there are some 10 Mb VoIP phones but my understanding is that most are now at least 100 Mb. These phones would not work on Cat 3 unless you manually configured network equipment to run at 10 Mb. Doesn't seem like a wise thing to do. Is VoIP over Cat 3 a common practice? --Kvng (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed these dubious statements. --Kvng (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

text: CAT3 cable is fine for analog & digital phones. For VoIP, the best bet is to check the system documentation. 64.208.159.230 (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: VoIP

message: I find the focus/bias on the "Cat5e or better" cabling dubious. If you are doing e.g. bleeding-edge modern smart home installations - in 2021 - then you use for cabling 1MBit CAN bus using shielded TP cable and (shielded) RJ11 connectors. All these connectors and cables are specified for Cat3. These are much more EMI resilient installations with real-time properties (contrary to ethernet) and also faster installations than the old KNX standard (9600 baud). Clearly, this article exhibits an Ethernet cognitive bias. LinguistManiac (talk) 07:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat5e+ Bias
Talk:Alys of France, Countess of Vexin

message: There's a genealogical problem with this lady. When was she really born? Almost all Wikipedia articles say 1170, and that she was the younger full sister of Philip II of France. But the French Wikipedia entry for her :fr:Adèle de France says 1160 (though this article also makes her daughter of Adèle of Champagne, which seems impossible since Louis VII of France only married Adèle in November 1160 and that was just five weeks after his second wife's death). Now, reliable non-Wikipedia sources tell me (a) that Alys was born in 1160, the daughter of Louis's second wife Constance of Castile, and that her mother died one day after giving birth; (b) that Alys and Richard I of England were betrothed in 1169; (c) that in 1177 the Pope attempted to insist that Henry II of England, in whose custody she was, should proceed at once with her marriage to Richard. The Pope would not have done that if she was only seven years old. So, is there some real problem in the sources, of which I'm not aware? Is there really any evidence of an Alys born in 1170? Because, if not, I'll put her back to 1160 throughout and it will all make sense. Andrew Dalby 12:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An editor on the French Wikipedia has now explained the origin of the statement that Alys was born in 1170. It comes from an 18th century genealogy by Anthelme. For the details, see User talk:Andrew Dalby#Adèle de France / Spouse of Guillaume II de Ponthieu. It is clearly wrong, but since it gave rise to this problem I'll footnote it here and in the French article. Andrew Dalby 13:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Leo van de Pas from Worldroots.com clearly says that Alys was born 23 April 1170, making her the daughter of Adéle de Chaampagne.jeanne (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When was she born?

message: Shouldn't the name be changed to Alys of Vexin? The Vexin sounds strange.15:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've moved it (8 years later!) Mieux vaut tard que jamais... Eric talk 21:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change 

message: I have added a new part to Portrayals in fiction. Maymichael2 (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Coricidin

message: It actually said that prior to 2002, the cough and cold variety of coro contained pseudoephedrine rather than chlorpheniramine maleate? wtf? seriously, that is terrible. I remember even way back in like 1999, when i used to pop the skittles it had chlorpheniramine. i removed that. there are a whole lot of other things on this page that need sources/references.
King crimson123 (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is inaccurate 

message: C's, Triple C's, Skittles, Angry Red Trolls, and Red M&M's...
you're joking right? this is like an old school documentary where everyone says 'wacky weed' instead of pot. needs a reliable reference. --AlexOvShaolin 01:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely second this opionion. Angry Red Trolls...... you've gotta be kidding me!!!WacoJacko (talk) 13:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I've only heard them referred to as Triple C's and Skittles, nothing else.--Ticallion (talk) 01:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C's, Triple C's, Skittles, Angry Red Trolls, and Red M&M's 

message: I've been told that you have to be 18 to buy Coricidin, is this true? Everybody I asks gives me an answer that not even they are sure about. I've heard there's no age restriction, I've heard 18, 21...anybody know for sure? --Ticallion (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on store policy.--75.161.223.91 (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do you need ID?
Talk:Chiquito (actor)

message: I have merged & redirected the content of this article to the Minor characters in Tintin page, following the practice that has already been adopted for more important characters such as General Alcazar and Chong-chen Chang. vlad_mv 17:56, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In Spain, if you say "Chiquito", 90% of the population will know you're talking about Chiquito de la Calzada. I think we should make this a disambiguation page. --euyyn 20:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig from chiquito de la calzada 

message: Since Chiquito's name is Augusto V. Pangan, Sr. I just need some info about this..
He had a son that I went to school with in the Philippines in Aquinas Grade School (also where Gabby Conception and Aga Muhlach went to study as teenagers).  His name is Archie but did not keep in touch with them
BARUZA
Baruza from a greek word waste (Basura)
Example: Do you pick a BARUZA item from your character?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.15.130 (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Chiquito the father of Jett Pangan?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-03-21/Half-million articles

message: This story is wrong!
Cyrius and I discussed which article might be the one in IRC, and as you can tell from reading my blog entry, I said it was a tie! - and then I went to bed. The person who made the decision that it was the soviet article and entered it into the press release was user 119, as evidenced by this edit.  This happened at midnight UTC. I WAS IN BED!  The only thing I had said, which is still available on my blog, is As it turns out, it is impossible to determine precisely who created the 500,000 article and what that article was. The closest we can get is to say it was a six way tie with the top articles on this page.
When I woke up the next day, I found that we now had a press release, and that someone, who I assumed was "official" made the decision for reasons of PR, had decided it was the soviet article, and they were using my data to make that choice. That was fine with me, and wanting to support the foundation and also not have faulty information on my website, I issued an update and simply tried to match their reasoning. True, my attempt at this was faulty, but PLEASE do not put the blame of choosing the article on me. That is simply not the case. I said it was a tie! --Alterego 18:01, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Sorry, the article wasn't trying to give you credit or blame for choosing the article. The order of things has been changed to make this clearer, and your work described as a reconstruction. --Michael Snow 19:26, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Plan 9

message: This article was getting messy, so I moved it to "Plan 9 (operating system)" and replaced "Plan 9" with this disambiguation page. I'm working on getting all of the links updated to "Plan 9 (operating system)"". (so don't worry if they aren't all fixed yet!) Colin Hill 18:36, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Okay, all of the links to this page have been updated, except for some user & talk pages that seemed better unedited. Colin Hill 20:29, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Since then, the operating system article was since renamed "Plan 9 from Bell Labs" since then.  The links seem all updated to that too.  Whiner01 05:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Elections in Palau

message: I just did a copyedit on this page, and there's nothing really on this page that isn't already in Politics of Palau. I think this page should either redirect there, or have actual information on the elections and summary information on the political system. -- Jwinters | Talk 18:46, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is there eas part of an elections by country series, so therefore a redirect is not a good idea. Gangulf 21:29, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cameron Watanabe

message: I considered merging this with Power Rangers: Ninja Storm#Rangers but a look at the [http:\\www.rangercentral.com/prns-rg-cam.htm Ranger Central] web-site persuaded me that there is enough available to make a full article. --Theo  (Talk) 18:50, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Power Rangers: Ninja Storm

message: I must confess to a certain amount of ignorance concerning this series, but I was given to understand that Cyber Cam was an android, rather than holographic. Had Cyber Cam been holographic, how was he able to maintain the zords? Didn't he also go somewhat insane in one episode and tie some characters up in the back room? How did he manage this if he was holographic? -- Supermorff 22:18, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyber Cam
Talk:Cenobitic monasticism

message: Duplicates material at Monastery. There is also Monasticism, which duplicates efforts. --Wetman 18:57, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I don't find it a problem that the article might duplicate some of the text in monastisicm article, but the article in and of itself seems to rehash the same points a few times (particularly the dispute about the origins of cenobitic monasticism). -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 08:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit repetitive, don't you think? 

message: The word "cenobitic" is an adjective, and as such is inappropriate for the title of an encyclopedic article. I would suggest changing the namespace for this article either to Cenobium (which is the noun form of the word) or Cenobitic Monasticism. Based on the tone of the article, I would think the latter to be more appropriate. Any input? MishaPan 14:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: I'd like some help in thinking about and adding a section on early Jewish (second temple era) monasticism. The Therapeutae as described by Philo of Alexandria seem to fit very well into this category. Aharon (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean the Therapeutae? Dimadick (talk) 17:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, the Therapeutae. Thanks for you correction. Aharon (talk) 00:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thereputae