Talk:Battle of Khanwa

message: This article is not wikified, not encyclopedic, and not coherent. Will need much work, which I may not be able to give it. I'm working on too many articles as it is. Zora 00:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Early matchlocks.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I have added reference to the Battle of Chaldiran in the "See Also" section. The Battle of Chaldiran was fought a decade before the First Battle of Panipat. The Ottomans made extensive use of cannons and firearms protected by a barricade of carts to win the battle. Babur procured his cannons and firearms from the Ottomans and used the similar tactics to win the battle.
I have added reference to the Battle of Ghaghra since this was the last major battle fought by Babur in India. This battle consolidated his empire.
Please review these changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayonpradhan (talk • contribs) 05:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no problem for the First Battle of Panipat and the Battle of Ghaghra. They are contextual.  Chaldiran is too far fetched.Ghatus (talk) 11:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of reference to Battle of Chaldiran and Battle of Ghagra in "See Also" section 

message: :1) I gave a long thought whether to acknowledge and include  mention of national pride, since two kind on objections would arise, one is Rana Sanga was fighting for self-interest not necessarily national interest second is many people contest whether pre modern India had concept of Nationhood at all. 
:2) Interesting part is a British historian is acknowledging  concept of Indian national pride even before rebellion of 1857 took place.  
:3) If it would Rana Sanga was struggling for only self interest for possession of few districts, several other dominions would not have joined him, It seems like on the line of Marathas fought the lost Panipat battle to save Delhi and 1857. Now some one can say this is  OR but words of  William Erskine can not be said to be OR.  
:4) I suggest some one update William Erskine article because it lacks refernces as of now and there are many other William Erskine are there and  some one needs to verify information and update article with refs.   
:5) It seems Babarnama available on Google books likely to be helpful in filling some of information gaps pointed out earlier.- Though Babarnama is technically primary source  you can fill in the gaps with info and confirm primary source with secondary scholarly source  and add the refs. 
:Thanks, and greetings 
:Regards Bookku (talk) 15:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You've really gone beyond what I had expected in your dedication to help solve this dispute. Yes, I would be happy to accept your suggested version and I appreciate the thought and effort you've put into preparing it.Alivardi (talk) 17:33, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks a lot . You've helped a great deal in solving this dispute. Since  is in agreement, I think we can implement it now. Shall I, ? Thanks to you too for the time you took to discuss this. 183.83.146.34 (talk) 01:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Go for it.Alivardi (talk) 20:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  My notes 

message: 'However, Indologist Gopinath Sharma who is well known for his scholarly work on..' is there any way to verify if he is truly an 'Indologist' as i fail to find him on any site so far. I would find it disconcerting and concerning to falsely cite individuals with professionalism without certifying it. BobRutsa (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the 'Background'.