lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dawn Ellerbe

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://gamecocksonline.cstv.com/sports/c-track/mtt/ellerbe_dawn00.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 11:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The following three citations contain URLs that seem to have succumbed to link rot:  
* "South Carolina’s Dawn Ellerbe Moves to Cal State East Bay" (sc.edu)
* "Ellerbe leads U.S. in debut of hammer throw" (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com)
* "My Way: Dawn Ellerbe" (skirt.com)
Fred Johansen (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References: Links not working
Talk:Fast Girls (song)

message: I added some information on the B-Side's of the Fast Girls single. Orginally, the B-Side was a track off her debut album entitled Janet Jackson called Love and My Best Friend and the second one was the French Blue medley of Fast Girls and Pretty Boy.
I just thought that I would pass that along.Frschoonover (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terry Clark (drug smuggler)

message: I have removed the following badly placed unsourced statement from an anon ip editor:
It mentions that Terry Clark may have faked his own death, yet does not actually add any source for this or explain how someone in a maximum security jail would be able to do so! Could someone with more wiki editing skill than me rectify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.145.145 (talk) 02:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article indicates that Clark killed Ollard burying the body in the Kuringai Chase but this claim is not cited. In the well researched 1981 book by Richard Hall titled "Greed - The 'Mr Asia' connection" on page 54 he says "The bodies of Ollard and Theilman have never been found. According to members of the Organisation, Clark said they had been buried under cement construction work at Sydney's International Airport". Sintch (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ollard killing 

message: While it is certainly true that Norma was a heroin addict, she was much more than that. I witnessed Clark doting on her around the time they married. As Norma was well known to the police, he would have known she was in many ways a liability. For some time, Norma charmed him. 
I am sure the marriage was legally recognised as the prison would not have put on a reception otherwise. I attended the reception as one of a small number of non-resident guests. 
I have searched in vain (from the UK) for details such as her date and place of birth, the date and location of her death, where an inquest was held and her place of burial. Norma was part Maori. If she told me which tribes or tribes she was descended from, I have forgotten. 
If anyone has further details, please post them here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendwell (talk • contribs) 18:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norma Fleet
Talk:Feels Like Tonight

message: I hid some details related to the music video because it's written in a very convoluted manner. Without clarity, I wonder if it's encyclopedic.  I mean...we don't care what they ate for dinner while they shot the music video, right? Tacos or ribs? Who cares.  So they apparently stayed up for a long time or didn't sleep during shooting.  OK...do we need to include these details? Do they really matter at all?  And if they do, or if you think they do...that's great...but let's please have much greater clarity.  The final sentence is ambiguous: "Contrary to popular belief, they didn't sleep for 3 days during filing."  Is that really what happened...the crew or the band were verifiably awake for 72 hours straight?  This doesn't necessarily clash with what's written about being involved in 48 hours of straight shooting, but it certainly confused me.  And what is popular belief?  I think since we don't know what popular belief is, we can't fully appreciate what it means to say "contrary to popular belief." DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 18:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video
Talk:Five O'Clock World

message: Pretty much all "original research", as if it's some kind of fan magazine. The article favors bloated pomposity over simple facts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 19:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 
Talk:Jim Howard (high jumper)

message: Wait! A new user and a IP address have been vandalizing this article, which was originally about a retired high jumper! Let me fix it. Thanks. Intothewoods29 (talk) 18:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 
Talk:Sheila Hudson

message: Dr Hudson was involved in a lawsuit against CSU-LA.  The lawsuit was settled, and she received $2.75m.  No fault was assessed and no one is allowed to discuss the case.  She was not allowed to work for CSU after this.  See the LA Times article June 19, 2019 "https://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sheila-hudson-lawsuit-20190103-story.html" 130.221.224.7 (talk) 06:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheila Hudson involved in lawsuit against Cal State University Los Angeles (CSU-LA)
Talk:Foe tha Love of $

message: It should be known in all pages referring to "Foe tha Love of $" that Yomo & Maulkie were the originals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.88.69 (talk) 07:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Forever in Blue Jeans

message: I'm sorry. Who the hell is this? I googled him and found a drummer.
And the fact is, I fantastically "cover" this song too. Lemme' put my name in there. 
Blondesareeasy (talk)grinning idiot here  —Preceding undated comment added 19:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rob Shawcross
Talk:Kathrine Switzer

message: 1967 several women participated in the Boston Marathon, including Bobbi Gibb (who had previously unofficially finished the marathon the year before, and prompted the rules change). Article improperly presented her as the only woman to run instead of one of a group.   
https://www.podiumrunner.com/events/the-real-story-of-the-first-woman-to-run-the-boston-marathon/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.156.253 (talk) 04:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of a group 

message: After reading the German wikipedia entry on Switzer, I was surprised to read here that she was supposedly born in Virginia. As there was no source to the claim and a lot of articles claiming she was born in Amberg, Bavaria, Germany, I changed the article including the sources. 
Unfortunately, her own page doesn't say anything about her place of birth. I've also only found German articles speaking about 1949 as the year of her family's return to the US (other articles don't mention a year). I will add an English speaking source if I find one Mudbiker (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace Germany not Virginia 
Talk:John Borowski

message: I think the guy is notable, but I think the page needs to be wikified.  I don't have a problem even if the guy did the page himself.  A notable person can do that if it is NPOV.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  08:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 

message: Ha ha, this page was definitely written by John Borowski himself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.97.232.45 (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobio

message: The following material was written by the title subject, John Borowski, and appears at IMDB, here :
It appears in IMDB with no sources. Any of this material appearing in this Wikipedia BLP article that is not otherwise sourced is being removed as self-published, and in violation of several WP policies.
Le Prof  Leprof 7272 (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing material directly tied to IMDB article authored by title subject

message: Having been through 12 pages of google hits, I find no evidence of the following claimed media attention paid to this article's subject:
* CBS News, 
* Wild Chicago
* Variety, 
* LA Weekly, 
* Chicago Sun-Times, 
* Ain't It Cool News, 
* Philadelphia Weekly, 
* Chicago Magazine), 
* Mancow Show, Deadpit Radio.
If those interested in this article wold be so kind as to provide actual citations to these articles, we can begin to rebuild the article from these publisjed sources.  Leprof 7272 (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Request assistance in locating claimed media coverage

message: , , please have a look at what I did, to wikify the article, and to remove all the unsourced (and in the hours I spent, unsourceable) information that someone had earlier pasted in from the IMDB biography written by Mr Borowski himself. Tony, per WP policy, it is not acceptable for someone to write and post their own biography here, and the material removed had no verifiable sourcing. It was just Mr. Borowski, saying trust me, this is me.  Now, it is much redacted, but it is all factual, and reasonable, and largely sourced. Hence, all tags were removed, except the call for further sources. To start us in this direction, I posted the list of places the article claimed earlier to have been places where the title subject was featured (see Talk immediately above), and, not finding these sources, I found a number of others, either incorporating them, or listing them in Further reading. This is all I will do for the article. (Was awaiting my spouse at a meeting.) I leave the oversight of the page up to both of your esteemed editorial hands. Le Prof.  Leprof 7272 (talk) 03:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Please keep an eye on the article
Talk:Kevin McMahon (hammer thrower)

message: He still teachs at BCP as of 9/7/2010.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.65.179.249 (talk) 01:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is semi-protected because almost all content edits to it prior to this date have been violations of the BLP policy.  Risker (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection
Talk:Galaxy of the Lost

message: What is the relationships between this track and Florence and the Machine's track with the same title? D-b (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions 
Talk:Get Away (Georgie Fame song)

message: I'm surprised at the claim that original issues of the record used one word - "Getaway" - rather than two - "Get Away".  The discography cited admittedly uses both - but this label shot - which it is reasonable to assume is of the original UK release, unless anyone says differently - clearly uses two words.  Any explanation welcome.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:09, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd completely forgotten I'd raised this, and now I look at it again I find it's not that simple.  Basically, I can see no consistency in whether it should be two words or one.  If you look here, there are copies of original UK Columbia labels with both spellings, and the rather unhelpful comment: "Some pressings show the A-side title as two words rather than one."  This sheet music shows it as one word, as does BMI here as the "legal title".  So, I was probably a bit too definitive in my 2011 comment.  What do you think, Martin? (I'm sure he'll turn up here!)  Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Goodness me. The "legal title" seems to be all in capitals! How bad can it get. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seven minutes!  What kept you? Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: two three plays of the song, naturally! Martinevans123 (talk) 12:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, mine looks like this one  so quite happy to see it stay like this. But some labels would have been printed and issued first, I guess, and they should take precedence? But how do we tell? Martinevans123 (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

text: I think the lyrics are inconclusive.  The reason some sources give the title as one word is surely that it was written as one word on some original labels, and maybe in information supplied by the record company, back in 1966.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Blatant WP:OR! and very convincing. I think Ghm has a good point - the lyrics seem to show both. And that' not surprising, as it would certainly be expected for Fame to enjoy a little word play, i.e. maybe it means both. Don't forget Bonnie and Clyde did not appear until the following year. Also, it's quite difficult to sing those three ascending notes in the song's chorus without putting the stress on the final syllable! I see that the title of the US album was very definitely two words: , but maybe that's a different kettle of bigger fried fish! Martinevans123 (talk) 11:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  One word or two?
Talk:Gimme All Your Lovin'

message: This song has been covered into a dance version; I know this because I've heard it, and it's pretty damn good. 
The only thing is, it's really difficult to verify who made it. The common attribution is that it's by a group called "Heavydance", and initial observations seem to bear that out. However, other observations say that it was made by a band called "Group X" - but I don't think it's the same Group X that's in Wikipedia.
It seems that it *was* included on an album, HeavyDance Volume 2. (sources: http://www.findance.com/arvostelut/603/-heavydance-2 (note, site is in Finnish), http://www.last.fm/music/HeavyDance/Vol.+2 .) This seems to be the second of a series of HeavyDance compilations, the first simply being titled HeavyDance. (Source: http://www.last.fm/music/HeavyDance/HeavyDance ; notice the similar styles.)
Amazon.com says that the songs on the first CD are by "Group X" (source: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003V04KIO/ref=dm_sp_alb?ie=UTF8&qid=1289940498&sr=8-17 ; click the individual song links) and it says that the copyright is held by Sony Music Entertainment (Finland) Oy, so I'm inclined to think that's a different band from the one Wikipedia has. However, the name doesn't appear at all on the CD cover; the largest image of the HeavyDance cover that I was able to find is https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61FRxaD2tXL._SS500_.jpg , and as you can see, it only mentions the song titles - not who made them.
This version of the song is notable as it appears on the YTMND Soundtrack on Volume 11 (although it lists the artist as "Heavydance" - source: http://wiki.ytmnd.com/YTMND_Soundtrack ).
I think I might see if I can contact the label, Columbia, and see what they have on the matter. --TheSophera (talk) 20:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HeavyDance cover
Talk:Girlfriend (The Pillows song)

message: I've heard from someone that neither version of "Girlfriend" was in the movie. Can someone who has watched Love Letter please verify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.148.188 (talk) 09:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

message: This article is currently marked as a stub, but I don't think it can be expanded upon. There is no extra information to add. I think that this article (and in fact, most of the pillows' singles articles) can be merged into a single "Discography" article. Mstremeski (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Bill Reifsnyder

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.bucknellbison.com/sports/hallfame/mtt/reifsnyder_williamp00.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 12:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Gluey, Gluey and The Ear Friend

message: Could the title of this page be changed from "Gluey Glue and the Ear Friend" to the correct title "Gluey, Gluey and the Ear Friend" please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MentalNotes (talk • contribs) 23:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong page title
Talk:God Is a Girl

message: The main article's cited melody overlap with Roxette's Jefferson explains a lot (I gave it a listen in YouTube, and it's a dead match for 19 of 19 notes in series).  I first bought Groove Coverage's "God is a Girl" early 2008, as a pop song 3:04 in length; at the time it had no dance elements/edits.  Shortly after that, the song disappeared from all e-tailers -- I now assume due to copyright issues.  For several years I would periodically check but could not find it anywhere. (I wanted to re-buy it as nonDRM with >128 kps.)  Now, late 2013, it re-appears as an EP, with six versions (iTunes lists the EP as released March 15, 2008 but trust me, they weren't selling it at any time between ~2009 and mid 2013), two of which have names that suggest either might be the original song, though their lengths are different: the "radio edit" at 3:40 and the "album version" at 3:43.  But none of the EP's six versions are the original song that I much preferred.  (I like dance tunes just fine, but the pop original of this song feels much more authentic to me.)  The six new dance edits still contain the melody held in common with Jefferson, but it occurs much less often. I'm thinking that is to stay within legal precedent of "fair use" sampling, to avoid copyright infringement.  Otherwise, why would the EP exclude the original 3:04 nondance version?  For ref, here is a YouTube post of the original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw5BKqYNd5I. -- ZenGeekDad 9-29-2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZenGeekDad (talk • contribs) 18:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Gorgeous (Eighteen Visions song)

message: Is this really the most famous song named Gorgeous?  The article [Gorgeous (Kanye West song)] is far longer, and there are a number of other singles of the same name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.179.114 (talk) 04:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gorgeous (song)
Talk:Got Me Under Pressure

message: It is noted that information about Linden Hudson continues to disappear from ZZ Top articles. However, the references to what Linden Hudson did with respect to the Eliminator album are iron solid references. Book references can be given by David Blayney (15 years as ZZ Top's stage manager), and by Deborah Frost (writer for Rolling Stone), and by David Sinclair (writer for the London Times). Wikipedia is strange. Is it about facts? Often it is not. It often seems to be about fluff and hype. We'll see how that pans out in the future (signed-Texasman444).
:Here's another huge reference about Linden Hudson's involvement, from Billy Gibbons himself, as he breaks his 30 year silence about this matter: Billy tells journalist Joe Bosso (musicradar.com) on June 3, 2013: "This was a really interesting turning point. We had befriended somebody who would become an influential associate, a guy named Linden Hudson. He was a gifted songwriter and had production skills that were leading the pack at times. He brought some elements to the forefront that helped reshape what ZZ Top were doing, starting in the studio and eventually to the live stage. “Linden had no fear and was eager to experiment in ways that would frighten most bands. But we followed suit, and the synthesizers started to show up on record. (end quote) (signed Texasman444)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Texasman444 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Linden Hudson's involvement
Talk:INF file

message: how does windows know that a certain .inf file is right for a device? Not just any inf file will be read by windows to install the driver. Iownatv (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

message: The Structure section doesn't say much about INF file structure. It goes on at length about the dangers of autoplay! Is this relevant? 82.28.153.207 (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure section
Talk:Guilty (Barbra Streisand and Barry Gibb song)

message: There isn't anything about the unusual way the beat changes. You can see in this music sheet that there are not just 4/4 but also 3/4 and 5/4 bars. Jules TH 16 (talk) 21:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time signature
Talk:Todd Williams (runner)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.usatf.org/athletes/bios/TrackAndFieldArchive/2000/williamst.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 02:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Woodrow W. Keeble

message: More inline citations are needed to bump this up to a B-class, and the article could do with some general editting as well. Otherwise, it looks good. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have upgraded this to a B class but there is still much work to do on the article.  I will attempt to clean it up in the next couple weeks. Any help would be greatly appreciated.--Kumioko (talk) 23:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't necessary to quote the entirety of Bush's remarks.  This isn't Wikiquote.  I'm pulling that section and turning it into an external link.  BrokenSphereMsg me 03:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment