Talk:RapidMiner

message: :Image:Yale andrews curves.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Yale andrews curves.gif

message: There is a notice on the article that "this article is written like an advertisement", and that the reader can find out more on the talk page. I don't see any discussion about this, and I'm wondering specifically why this is labeled as being like an advertisement. (Also, I'm wondering if I'm using the talk page correctly) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klinebottle (talk • contribs) 18:18, 2 July 2010 
:The body of the article reads like an advertisment, and the article has no independent sources. --Ronz (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article definitely is written like an advertisement, and in such a bad shape that IMHO it should best be killed and started completely new (plus it might actually be a copy of some official rapidminer advertisement and thus a copy right violation!). The extensions should be listed on the rapidminer webpage, no need to copy the links into Wikipedia. I do however consider the product itself notable, so I would not file a deletion request. It should just be rewritten completely from someone independent from rapidminer to not contain any advertisment wording. --Chire (talk) 16:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this an advertisement?

message: *Reads like an advert 
*Header fixes 
*Remove spam. fluff, puffery etc. 
*Check refs 
*check factual accuracy
*refs - fixes and add some
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone against stubbing down it to just the introduction? --Ronz (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd just remove the advertisment sections, i.e. "What is", "Software Versions" and "Who uses". The next sections are acceptable. --Chire (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to do the headers to start with, then a copyedit run.  Chaosdruid (talk) 09:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work. Now if we can find some refs... --Ronz (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: How could and open-source version be really limited to 1 core and 10k rows? Couldn't just everybody change this limit in the source code? This does not make sense to me - except when it actually is not completely open-source AGPL, but rather loads non-free components over the network later on? 78.48.26.63 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really AGPL?