Talk:Openmoko

message: This section sounds like an advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.23.102.124 (talk) 06:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Generation of Devices 

message: Come on people, WP is normally really good at getting info on new products. Anyone fancy beefing this up a bit? There are plenty of sources. Chris Cunningham 13:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put it on the free software task list.  Maybe that'll help. Gronky 22:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: The article has a link to a video, but the website requires Adobe Flash (which some people refuse to install since it is proprietary software).  Does anyone know of a link to the actual video file which people can download and which everyone could watch? Thanks. Gronky 22:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a video that doesn't need flash? 

message: I agree that listing articles which could be used as references is useful.  I moved the non-referenced links to a new "bibliography" section because non-references do not belong in a "references" section.  They're not gone, they're just in a more accurately titled section. Gronky 14:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Flash video certainly doesn't belong in a section entitled "bibliography". I'm going to go though these, integrate those which are actually being used and remove the rest. Chris Cunningham 12:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok.  My point isn't that those links are part of a "bibliography".  If you want to change the name of that section (to something other than "references") or split it into multiple sections or delete it altogether, those things are all fine for me.  Some, such as the video, should go in external links, now that I think about it.  It seems that we both have the goal of putting that video link in the article somewhere so that someone will learn something and improve the article.  Putting it in only as a reference reduces the chances that anyone will watch the video for learning purposes (because we'd be saying the video's only relevent value is to prove some particular statement).  Anyway, it's up to you. Gronky 12:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: The content on the OpenMoko wiki on http://www.openmoko.org/ is under the same license as WP (and uses the nicest MonoBook variant I've seen on a MediaWiki). We should be stealoing mercilessly from it to drive this article to a good length and attract more editors.
As an aside, what would have to be done to set up a better interwiki experience here? Chris Cunningham 14:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenMoko wiki ripe for plundering 

message: there's an ongoing discussion about this on the openmoko mailing list. the two are not the same - one is an open OS based on linux put together by a community of volunteers, one a piece of hardware made by a company trying to turn a profit. i've moved some detail about slipping dates for the neo to the neo article. it is important to keep them separate. forgetting they are separate has led to some angry exchanges on the list.
Inzy 20:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  openmoko != neo1973 

message: Elsewhere, I've seen people mention that OpenMoko will be using GTK+ (as opposed to Qt), but despite extensive searching, I can't figure out which desktop environment they're using. GPE would be the obvious choice, but perhaps they're developing a separate GTK-based environment...?
Fairly important information, I think, especially considering the target (geek) user. --Lode Runner 17:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per this, it's a custom library built on top of GNOME's stack. Chris Cunningham 10:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desktop Environment? 

message: For your consideration: User:Fleminra/Comparison of free software-based mobile phone platforms.  I wonder if it would get deleted if I moved it to the main namespace.  —Fleminra 01:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Comparison of free software-based mobile phone platforms" 

message: Since the anonymous encyclopedicity police don't want this in the article, I'll put it here:
:Phoronix has reported that Google is "looking to team up with OpenMoko" for the rumored gPhone. [Google Using OpenMoko For gPhone?] —Fleminra 01:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  gPhone 

message: Where is link for the phone's schematic (can't find on their wiki) ? Some of the ICs used even miss datasheets. It's either fully open, or it isn't open at all. I can run linux on Siemens SX1 - maybe it should also be called OpenSX1 ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.140.96 (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: False dilemma. They tried to be as open as possible (going as far as opening the CAD schematic for the phone's case). It's possibly the most open cell phone so far. However, there are some limits (for instance, as far as I know there is no GSM chipset which does not require a NDA). The GSM chipset, in fact, is most probably the reason they do not have the schematic for the main PCB (they do have the schematic for the debug board and the GTA02 battery). --cesarb (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ClosedMoko ? 

message: Does OpenMoko hardware has USB device or USB host, 1.1 or 2.0, or no USB ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.2.163.124 (talk) 15:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the Neo1973 and Neo Freerunner has a USB-port, and can do both host and device USB 1.1. Freerunner has powerd USB, Neo1973 has not. --81.172.223.220 (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  USB port ? 

message: According to this page on the Openmoko wiki, GTA probably stands for Generic Telephone Appliance. --81.172.223.220 (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GTA 

message: Anybody has noticed that OpenMoko, Inc. is the entity that controls  and ? I'm not sure what that entails, but this article makes it seem like this is a community project, instead of a company... However, I am not sure how to approach this, since there is not enough information for me to correct the current information. --Andresj (talk) 03:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenMoko, Inc. 

message: Is OpenMoko dead, and is that because there is already a hugely popular open source phone platform called Android?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmicharade (talk • contribs) 03:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Android? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Openmoko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9978560959.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150905204031/http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Openmoko-supported_hardware to http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/OpenMoko-supported_hardware
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723051724/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2010-October/063653.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2010-October/063653.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723051617/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2009-April/045297.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2009-April/045297.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216071812/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-February/013205.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-February/013205.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070702135331/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/announce/2007-April/000012.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/announce/2007-April/000012.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216071812/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-February/013205.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-February/013205.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303170508/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2010-September/063077.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2010-September/063077.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303173912/http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2010-October/063512.html to http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2010-October/063512.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080409182618/http://www.dash.net/ to http://www.dash.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)