Talk:Jon Kyl

message: I came here to read more about Jon Kyl, featured in the national news tonight as John McCain's Senate replacement.  Why are we reading a justification of Planned Parenthood's work?  Not relevant.  Take it down.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdithStein4SD (talk • contribs) 23:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial comments 

message: I think adding potential bills that Senators sponsor is a good idea, and I would like to add information on it, particularly here and at John Cornyn.  The particular bill is about collecting DNA from suspects and placing it indefinitely in federal databases, regardless of conviction or acquittal.  --Iosif 22:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Sponsored Bill Policy

message: I just restored my wording around the Kyl / Graham amicus brief in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case.
The apparent attempt to mislead the supreme court is the reason why this brief is notable;  from the article (and several references quoting it) the "extensive colloloquy" 'appears to have been' an attempt to create a ficticious transcript (including staged interruptions, asking if they had time left, etc.) and pass it off as real senate discussion--hence the title of the reference (Invisibile Men : Did Lindsey Graham and Jon Kyl mislead the Supreme Court?)
Haven't been through the edit history so I'm not sure quite how it got dropped--with the recent run on vandalism / clean up it may just have been dropped accidentally. If anyone does have a POV concern please feel free to suggest alternate wording --Cambridgegames 01:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempt To Mislead Supreme Court 

message: The article says "A law professor writing at National Review Online suggested that perhaps Kyl's comments..."
Michael New, the person who wrote the article, isn't a law professor.  He is a political science professor and pro-life strategist.  The article should be changed to reflect this (unless that was not intended to be a factual statement either). 198.169.15.6 (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I changed "law professor" to "political science professor".  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! 198.169.15.6 (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law professor at NRO 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jon Kyl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090122054343/http://gamblingandthelaw.com/columns/2006_act.htm to http://www.gamblingandthelaw.com/columns/2006_act.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204122835/http://gawker.com/5791100/watch-stephen-colberts-defense-of-planned-parenthood to http://gawker.com/5791100/watch-stephen-colberts-defense-of-planned-parenthood
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206010205/http://gawker.com/5791496/stephen-colbert-gives-jon-kyl-a-taste-of-his-own-medicine to http://gawker.com/5791496/stephen-colbert-gives-jon-kyl-a-taste-of-his-own-medicine
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824113325/http://kyl.senate.gov/ to http://kyl.senate.gov/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jon Kyl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071223033707/http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002637521 to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002637521
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426162057/http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2006-04-13/news/feature.html to http://phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2006-04-13/news/feature.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926225845/http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/155007 to http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/155007
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jon Kyl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070302143035/http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jon_Kyl to http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jon_Kyl
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have a question. If Jon Kyl is comeing back to the US Senate. would Jon Kyl become senior United States Senator for Arizona?96.36.68.29 (talk) 04:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's based on who has been there longer in continuous service.  Flake was the junior senator, and is now the senior senator.  When he leaves office, Kyl will become the senior senator. hbdragon88 (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  senior United States Senator for Arizona