lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coteau des Prairies

message: Note: Big Stone Lake is north of and not part of the Coteau. See USGS link at article.Jerry picker 15:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Army Officer Selection Board

message: Changed a few things today  - mostly just adding some details and delineating some of the processes.  However, I stopped short of an edit giving full details of what happens at the Main Board.  There is, I believe, no reason why this should not be done though - the Army does not really make much secret about the process as anyone who has attempted to join Sandhurst will tell you. See also: for example.
Thus I suggest a future re-edit detailing the four days at Main Board.
--Tom Gibbs 15:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of cities in Saint Lucia

message: I doubt Rodney Bay is a city. Rodney Bay is part of Gros Islet. It's merely a section of a larger district and not a city. Anything north of the union gap via the Castries GrosIslet Highway, is technically Gros Islet No?
:according to GeoNames, Rodney Bay is a populated place,   15:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How many villages are there in Saint Lucia 69.80.12.12 (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many villages are there in Saint Lucia
Talk:Xpilot

message: Hi, Interesting point. However xpilot-ng has different authors, players and is now so different from xpilot that in my opinion it is worth distinguishing between the two (certainly they should refer to each other). I would be interested to see other peoples opinions though. (disclaimer I am involved with the xpilot-ng development) Orbitalia 15:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:FDNY Necrology

message: This article does not say what FDNY necrology even is (Is it a particular unit? A job? A list of former stations?) let alone what its significance is and why it should be separate from the main FDNY article. From what's here, all I can assume is that it's about an old fire house that hasn't been used in 100 years. 
If this is going to stand on its own, it needs an introduction to define the topic and should have more prose in each section to explain the significance of each aspect. As it is now, it doesn't even qualify as a stub because it does not contain enough information to define its own title. Kafziel 16:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged and redirected. Kafziel 19:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lady Friday

message: Viz.: "Assumed" name?  While I know the U.K. isn't exactly as reliable a source for Garth Nix information as Australia, then "Lady Friday" is given as the name of the 5th book in the back of our Sir Thursday.  And bear in mind that the U.K. Drowned Wednesday had a Sir Thursday synopsis in the back that wasn't present in the Australian edition, either.
:I would say that the title is definite.  Each book so far has been named after the appropriate Day.  As Friday is the immediate day after Thursday, and Friday is known to be called "Lady Friday" on [webpage] there is an almost 100% likelihood that the next book will be Lady Friday.12.17.189.77 04:32, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone just edited that to say that Friday is afflicted with envy. The consensus is that she is afflicted with lust, as lust is specific to pleasures of the flesh. If you disagree, please talk about it here before changing it on the page. Alcemáe   T  • C   04:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Emotion is something of the flesh, in the context of human desires. She may want them, but envy has a different emphasis, i.e. envy is where you want something because you feel more entitled to it, or just for the sake of someone else having it. If you really want to debate it, your going to need to go to a larger forum, as the consensus on Wikipedia is that it's lust. Alcemáe   T  • C   02:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure if you're saying it should be changed, but if you are, I would suggest you look  as opposed to   The consensus among Wikipedia and the internet is that she is Lust. Alcemáe   T  • C   04:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, as there isn't really a source on this, as technically it's not something stated in the books, or by Garth Nix as far as I'm aware, we have to go with consensus, which is that she is Lust. Alcemáe   T  • C   05:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lust or Envy
Talk:Medical University of South Carolina

message: Who is the Chief of Staff at MUSC?
:Where?  There is a chief in each school and department.  The head of the school is President, not Chief of Staff.  He is Ray Greenberg. --Kainaw (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: David J. Cole is the President of MUSC. Barton L. Sachs is Chief of Staff at MUSC Medical Center. Doctor No9 (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Chief of staff

message: User:Dewitt Travis is edit warring      to add content supported by documents uploaded to Google drive  this is not an acceptabe method of sourcing as they have been told before. Theroadislong (talk) 06:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unacceptable source
Category talk:1970 deaths

message: There is a factual error in the 1971 Deaths page. Mary Ann Ganser died in 1970, not 1971. 1971 is, unfortunately, a frequently occuring date on sites about the Shangri Las and/or Mary Ann. Three sites I'm aware of have it correct:  Footnote 4, in Phil X Milsteins' "Shangri Las 77!" bio;  John Grecco's comprehensive bio "The Shangri-Las!" on the Redbird site (Page 4); and  The Shangri-Las fan site.
Marguerite (Margie) Ganser Dorste's obituary can be found at the following sites:
 South Coast Today, New Standard August 4, 1996;
 ObitCentral, Miscellaneous Bristol County, Massachusetts Obituaries;
 and Google Groups alt.obituaries (formerly Deja News, IIRC), a reprint of an August 3, 1996 Newsday entry of Margie's obit.
Please note that the wording is identical at each location; they all state "Some of Mrs. Ganser Dorste's ashes will be buried with her sister Mary Ann, who died in 1970."
Now, not to put too fine a point on it, but obituaries are usually written by the family, or by someone working closely with the family. As far as I know, Margie had only one twin sister named  Mary Ann and, while I suppose it's possible in theory for the family to get the year of her death wrong, I'd be inclined to lean in the direction of them getting it right. They say she died in 1970. Mary Ann Ganser's name should be moved from the 1971 list to the 1970 list. I was going to edit this myself, but all I get is gibberish on the edit screen, so I'm assuming it takes special privileges to edit these pages. (Or, since I'm new at this, I'm missing the knowledge needed to do it.)
This, as I've already said, is a piece of misinformation that appears on most sites where the Shangri-Las are mentioned. It wouldn't be much of a stretch to imagine they tend to feed off one another, e.g. one site says 1971, someone wanting to mention the group on a different site runs across the first and repeats it, and so on until it becomes impossible to stamp out. I tend to believe the family and the people in the business (Phil Milstein and John Grecco, for instance) rather than someone, no matter how sincere or well meaning, who is simply winging it. I found Margie's obit without a whole lot of effort; so could anyone interested in doing a little research to verify an event.
Whichfinger 16:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: added heading to above contribution. Ghmyrtle 10:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mary Ann Ganser ([[The Shangri-Las]])
Talk:BBC Symphony Orchestra

message: The reason that Jiří Bělohlávek wasn't included in the list of conductors at the bottom of the article is that he is scheduled to take over in July 2006, but as of today has not yet done so.  I think we need some general policy to deal with this situation (which also currently affects the London Symphony Orchestra).  Just putting his name on top of the list makes it look as if he has already taken over and is currently the conductor.  Also, he may in fact never become principal conductor for any one of a thousand possible reasons -- either party might change their mind, he might get sick, etc.  I'm going to try putting him in italics with an explanation.  If anyone else has a better way of indicating this, feel free to improve it.  Grover cleveland 16:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, before I edited though, the list made it look as if Slatkin was still principal conductor. David Underdown 13:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that Slatkin's ending date was given as 2004 :)  However Belohlavek was given as (2006-) which would confuse anyone who didn't read the article carefully or didn't know that that Proms occur in late summer.  I agree that we should have some way of indicating that the position is currently vacant.  Take a look at the current version of the article and see what you think.  Grover cleveland 18:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh no it wasn't, the version I saw had Slatkin (2000-).  But anyway, looks fine now. :) David Underdown 14:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sonata for Two Pianos and Percussion says that the Sonata was written in 1937, premiered in that form in Basel in 1938, and arranged in 1943 as a Concerto for Two Pianos and Orchestra, which was premiered in New York with the New York Philharmonic under Fritz Reiner. 
Bartók did not write any other work of this name.  So, how come it was supposedly premiered by the BBC SO in the 1930s, at least 4 years before it even came into existence in the form of a double concerto?  
I'm removing this as an obvious error, but if anyone can confirm what this claim is really supposed to be about, I'd be delighted to hear more.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 07:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Premiered Bartók's Concerto for Two Pianos and Orchestra?  I don't think so

message: Anyone have a list of conductors with years they were in charge? Would be the proper addition here. Canlawtictoc (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of conductors 
Talk:Center of Molecular Immunology

message: This page was created with public information from the official website of Center of Molecular Immunology. I was testing Wiki for the first time.  (Alejandro, Physics Faculty. Hav University)
Lage 16:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

message: can you geo tag it?  I could not find it. ( Martin |  talk • contribs  13:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  where is it located in havana
Talk:Windsor, California

message: The 1996 gang incident is well-documented, but I have concerns about it having undue prominence - see WP:UNDUE. The solution to that is probably to add information to the article, rather than delete information about this incident.
Whether Windsor still has gang activity is a factual question. This 2005 Press Democrat article does mention Windsor still having a gang, but that's almost 10 years ago. I do note that for the eight years between 2005 and 2012 [the latest year for which there is information], according to city-data.com, there was a total of one homicide in Windsor. City-data.com also lists overall crime rates for Windsor and six of the other eight incorporated cities in Sonoma County; Windsor has the lowest crime rate of all seven. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 18:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gang-related information 

message: * https://www.townofwindsor.com/DocumentCenter/View/3278/DEIR---Chapter-5-6?bidId= (chapter 6.4 is "Cultural and Historic Resources")  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 00:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources for expansion 

message: ^ 
2603:8001:3846:2D00:A9F1:F42B:E0E6:2480 (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about the scandal with the firmer mayor!?
Talk:Mitchell Wade

message: First -- more details on MZM ripping off the Defense department (see, e.g., http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/27420, which can also be sourced at Wash Post).
Secondly -- this defense scandal might need it's own article, as different players were involved in different parts, not all of it overlapping.  For example, Duke Cunningham and Wade were involved in some parts.  But Wade was also trying to bribe a number of other Congressman (such as Katherine Harris) who had nothing to do with Cunningham.  Separate and apart from anything Wade did was the bribery that wene on between Cunningham and Brent Wilkes.  Then, in the meantime, Wilkes and Congressman John T. Doolittle were doing there own separate thing with Perfect Wave.
Thoughts? -- Sholom 16:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Details -- Should there be a separate article? 

message: Looking at the improvement that the Abramoff template brought I thought it time to apply the same idea here. There is a huge overlap between this article and the Cunningham article. --Gorgonzilla 05:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template etc
Talk:Conrad Lozano

message: *I'm glad some finally started this page. evrik 16:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs major re-write. Many claims need either citation or deletion, and many claims are too trivial for inclusion. The article also needs substantial copy-editing by someone fluent in written English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup
Talk:World Series of Poker Circuit

message: I think that would be an important piece of information to include. Tromboneguy0186 00:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buy-in? 

message: Each stop on the circuit actually has several events, with buy-ins starting at just a few hundred dollars.  This page seems to suggest that each stop only has one event. 67.163.217.157 16:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It only lists the main events. This article has some nice numbers in it. Maybe one wants to include them http://www.pokernews.com/news/2010/08/a-look-the-wsop-circuit-numbers-over-the-years-8697.htm -14:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All of the events? 

message: The redirect David Larson (quarter-professional poker player) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 14:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:David Larson (quarter-professional poker player)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect David Larson (poker player) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 14:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:David Larson (poker player)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Martin Kabrhel (midstakes poker player) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Martin Kabrhel (midstakes poker player)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bill North

message: There is an existing article on Bill North. Schmiteye 16:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Will ask Technical Requests for a history merge. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Billy North →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. The page itself and all of the references refer to North as Bill, not Billy. Bill appears to be the name that is predominantly used. The only source that I could find that uses Billy is this one, and the first sentence even says that North himself prefers Bill. Oneforfortytwo (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 June 2022
Talk:Educational psychology/Article links

message: 190 as of today. Rfrisbietalk 16:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links from the article 

message: 160 as of today. Rfrisbietalk 17:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links from ''this'' article with no link to here 

message: 93 as of today. Rfrisbietalk 17:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links from ''other'' articles with no links back to them
Talk:Caterham School

message: Victuallers 19:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I was there until summer '87.  I was in the Main School from autumn '84, and the min school had one assembly for everyone every morning.  And I never saw any girls.  
I'd heard girls had been admitted to 6th form some time after I left, can't remember when, exactly.  But there were no girls there while I attended. Ganpati23 (talk) 06:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girls had been admitted to the sixth form education since 1981.  Really?
Talk:European route E20

message: Is it really necessary to have all the exit ramps in the article? Ghent 17:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not. It is enough to refer to the Danish article. -- BIL 11:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Danish part

message: This seems to be an article about nothing. It is obvious from the road map that no driver would really attempt to get from Tallinn to Shannon (say) by following the E20, as it would involve a quite unnecessary number of ferry journeys. Plainly the E20 is just a politically-motivated administrative construct rather than anything with any concrete reality. It is simply a re-naming of a number of existing roads in different countries. Therefore could we not just delete this article? Twilde (talk) 15:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it should not be deleted. The road exists and that is enough. It is obvoius that you think the road number should not exist and a start would be to delete it from Wikipedia. I can see from your contributions that you write about British political subjects. The road possibly does not exist in the UK, but it is important for other countries. -- BIL (talk) 11:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: "There is no ferry between Kingston upon Hull and Esbjerg."
A pretty crap route then. --128.40.46.101 (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most European highways are well routed, meaning they are suitable to use between any two points along them. But the E20 is not so well routed, no ferry and the odd direction Malmö-Gothenburg. The E20 is a partly a political compromise, parly because of the large sea areas which prevent a regular grid as in central Europe. The reason for the missing ferry is maybe the low-price air travel which has killed some long-distance ferry routes. --BIL (talk) 07:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No ferry? 

message: The introduction says there *is* a ferry from Immingham, but later down the page it says there isn't one anymore. Which is correct? Asheiou (talk) 01:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Asheiou Oh nevermind, I see that it's saying there's a commercial ferry but not a passenger one. Silly me! Asheiou (talk) 01:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Schema (psychology)

message: Hi. Should we change this article to use the plural form "schemata" instead of "schemas"? That's what I have learned in this context, but I'm a bit hesitant to change it, since I'm not an native English speaker and Merriam-Webster says both forms are acceptable. Currently, there is note in the middle of the text that says: "NB: in reality the plural of 'schema' is 'schemata'", which looks a bit silly IMO. /skagedal... 17:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That note needs to go. But as for schema, I think the singular has become the standard for article names. As to schemas, that should be changed to schemata. I'll look at it. --DanielCD 20:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural form 

message: Bartlett (1932) needs a reference to the actual study. The "Rastifarian" example does as well, as I have heard this somewhere before. I'll try to find some refs as I have time, but hope others can assist and add any refs they might know of. --DanielCD 20:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The reference link does not work. --Haizum    μολὼν λαβέ 20:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: Title sez it all -- I thought OB stood for maybe "operant behaviorism" but Wiki doesn't list any near-such defn for OB.  It's in a peripheral (and possibly sarcastic) comment, but if present it ought to contribute to the article, or at least not get in the way? Jjzanath (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor point: Would someone clarify "OB" in paragraph 4?.... 

message: First off, there's a contradiction in the article: who introduced the term schema, Anderson or Kant? The article says both were first to use it. Second, the "thought" and "background" sections are written in academic discourse and rely too heavily on psychological terminology. I don't mean it should avoid such terms, but the way it's written is too much like a psych term paper or an article in a psychology journal.Elle (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Improvement 

message: Have a look: Immanuel Kant. I'm going to have a look at the page on Immanuel Kant what's causing it. CU later, SvenAERTS (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something wrong with the reference to Immanuel Kant - there's no summary that pops up 

message: — Assignment last updated by Gmcph (talk) 02:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: — Assignment last updated by Pmmuab77 (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: — Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
Talk:Dominic DeNucci

message: His name is acutally spelled Dominic DeNucci. His last name is one word. My source for this is Mankind: Have a Nice Day by Mick Foley, specifically chapters 4-5 where Mick discusses his training. I propose moving the page to the correct spelling. Any objections? Nikki311 20:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: What is the source for his date of birth? In his 2013 induction speech at the WWE Hall of Fame Mick Foley stated that he was 82 years old at the time. Wouldn't that mean, that he'd be 83 by now and is born in 1931? --188.102.172.163 (talk) 19:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Anton Korošec

message: I changed "Yugoslav nation" to "Yugoslav state" in the article because of the controversity of such a claim, i.e. the existence of one Yugoslav nation. The Serbian centralist and unitarist regime during in the time of the Yugoslav Kingdom tried to force a cultural blending of the country's three recognized nations (Slovenes, Croats and Serbs) to ensure Serbian domination. Although it is true the constitution officially established one Yugoslav nation with three officially recognized "tribes", it does not mention any of the other nationalities such as Bosnian Muslims, Macedonians or Montenegrins, and the constitution itself was imposed by king Alexander I., who had dissolved the parliament after the infamous shooting and proclaimed himself as supreme authority.
Also, the bloodbath of the past 15 years on the Balkans has shown how absurd claiming existence of one Yugoslav nation really is. --Xdx 17:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yugoslav state not Yugoslav nation
Talk:Isla Grande

message: how can it be a half hour drive if you have to also catch a boat? Jabencarsey 17:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

message: See also Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego Jidanni (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego