lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Topopolis

message: How would a tube in a circle or torus knot rotate around its axis (the inner axis of the tube, required to keep artificial gravity) unless it were flexible or segmented?  Such a structure would have vast stresses on it...I'm no engineer, but I think that would rule out flexibility.  So is it segmented then? -Fëaluinix 10:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotational Difficulties
Talk:Transvaal Park

message: Was the roof concrete or glass? The links do not agree. Thmazing (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Roof
Talk:Elite Tower

message: The tower has generated a lot of excitement over the years, but it is now clear that it won't be built (instead, two smaller towers will be built on the same lot), and the new towers won't be very interesting or notable (so far). I believe that this article can be merged or deleted, unless someone wants to expand it with the complete history of the project. —Ynhockey (Talk) 20:57, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need this article? 
Talk:Towards the Republic

message: The following unreferenced trivia was present in the article. I removed it; if anybody thinks it has encyclopedic value and can reference it, please restore it (but keep WP:TRIVIA in mind]]). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Looking at the history of this article, it seems that it has went through several significant revisions, with lots of content being replaced - practically all of it unreferenced and much of it showing some serious POV. I've replaced the latest (again, unreferenced) version with mine (I've written most of it before realizing we already have an article on that subject). Editors interesting in improving this article further may find some interesting material in the history - but no references... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New version
Talk:Conrad Fort Lauderdale

message: Donald Trump's involvement in the project in association with the Bayrock group was scrubbed from the article. This information needs to be added back and the page should be locked. This paged it linked to in places and leads to this scrubbed article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.141.194.2 (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donald Trump and Bayrock group scrubbed from article
Talk:The Dominick

message: Several sources citing a fall off in revenues;
https://www.wnyc.org/story/trump-soho-plans-layoffs/
The reason that this is noteworthy is that this is a first, a President with business branding, and should be considered as part of the article. --Wikipietime (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2017 Revenue Fall out over Trump
Talk:Riverside South, Manhattan

message: : moved from Trump Place. Station1 (talk) 04:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Riverside South (Trump Place) → Riverside South (New York City) — The project is again known by its original name -- Riverside South.  Donald Trump has not been associated with the project since it was sold to Extell Development Corp. in 2005. - Pamela Miller (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Comment — This movement has turned in to a mess due to ClueBot. The article is under Trump Place, while the talk page is under Talk: Riverside South (Trump Place). sigh  「ɠu¹ɖяy」¤ • ¢  02:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: "Continuing to face bankruptcy, Trump was introduced..." Trump continued to face bankruptcy?  Or less than literate text?--Wetman (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Trump bankruptcy?

message: Please elaborate on this report…
https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/manhattancb7/downloads/pdf/projects/riverside-center/rsc-rspc.pdf
And very interested in a 2018 update on plans to relocate highway, now that tunnel for it looks nearly complete as observed from the bike path. Thanks to everyone for this definitive entry on this mega project.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfrishauf (talk • contribs) 17:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please elaborate on this report… 

message: The first photo on the page has a caption that reads "A view of the complex from the Hudson River." When you click on the photo to enlarge it, the caption of the enlarged photo reads "Trump Place from the river." The photo is a panoramic view of the entire Riverside South project and there is nothing to indicate which building is or was Trump Place. I say "was" because I think that the Trump name has been removed completely from the three "Trump" buildings as of 2019. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-place-799310/ "Last Two NYC Buildings Named ‘Trump Place’ Vote to Remove President’s Name" Feb 2019. I hope that someone can confirm the name changes and recaption the enlarged photo. Thank you. AdderUser (talk) 00:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Caption needs fixing
Talk:Quantitative psychology

message: I'm working on a presentation on the history of quantitative psychology, and when I have a few minutes I'll put that up there, so perhaps someone else can flesh it out afterwards? Youaredj 04:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vestry

message: First paragraph could really use some work - clarification and it isn't completely accurate Uberveritas (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: aside from the important derived meanings of the word vestry detailed in the article (where sacristy would be a misnomer) I think the word sacristy is now used by just one denomination in particular for the purposes described in the sacristy article. Eddaido (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: How did the vestries recruit their members? Was membership in the gift of a local squire or similar, or was there some form of election? Or did you just turn up? BTLizard (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 

message: The lede, as altered by this edit, now appears to say that every room in or attached to every place of worship is a vestry. That can't be right. James500 (talk) 01:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: How is this different from a Sacristy?--130.88.158.131 (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacristy 

message: The vestry committee was a major part of local government for several centuries and it is not appropriate to have it as a heading in an article which starts with the vestry room. Suggest splitting vestry and vestry committee Dougsim (talk) 06:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree. I'd rather have one article on two related subjects than two miserably short articles on related subjects. The council is named after the room in which it meets/met. It makes sense to me to keep them together. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 17:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the suggestion. I would split to [ [Vestry]], and [ [Vestry (ecclesiastical)]].  --ClemRutter (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just been Bold. It at least now reads like an article- please ce and look to adding content to the lead. --ClemRutter (talk) 10:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article

message: With only passing mention of the modern (substantial) meaning and operational definition of vestry in various other denominations, this article needs expanding to reflect the evolution of the vestry from the original English model to include its successor organs in disparate denominations and nations. Trumblej1986 (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above, and add that there is no mention of the use of the Vestry system in English colonies of the Caribbean. I think we may need several articles to cover the topic effectively.Leutha (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavily CoE/UK centric
Talk:Void deck

message: Doesn' really explain what a void deck is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.159.247 (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. It says it's "a space for community mingling" and that it's under an apartment block, and has a photo. Equinox (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I cleaned it up     10:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Women's shelter

message: The funding section of article includes "In late 2011 Washington governor Christine Gregoire released a budget proposal stripping all state funding for domestic violence and women's shelters across Washington State.", BUT checking the sole reference seems to mention Gregoire only once (about her signing sentencing House Bill 2777 into law), with word-search getting no match for "budget" nor "funding", one match for "fund" (re UNICEF), and main instance of "2011" is "new  sentencing  structure  becomes effective in August 2011".
Also, i did some Google News searches and could find no news source(s) for the accusation. Did regular Google searches for less time and the top matches just seemed to be pages copy-pasting the Wikipedia article (EDIT: except with dispute templates stripped out and some with references stripped out).
The ref (Seattle University Law Review) is cool, and maybe should be used elsewhere in article. (just NOT for this possibly libelous text about Gregoire) --EarthFurst (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closest I've found so far is https://lihi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/housingwashingtonmarch2009.pdf (PAGE 3) with a Gregoire proposed budget released in 2008 with eliminating some programs and reduced funding to others, BUT i see no mention of women's shelters. --EarthFurst (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christine Gregoire
Talk:Workshop

message: I think this page should be disambigated. There should be separate pages with sources if possible. I might work on trying to get one made later today or tomorrow. If someone else would like to do it, go ahead and start it :).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinkleheimer (talk • contribs) 18:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: You could elaborate more on Workshop (definition ) related to gathering and traing by listing agenda item for typical events.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.32.9 (talk) 04:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  elaborate more on Workshop 

message: Perhaps a article called Workshop tools can be made giving an overview of essential tools for each type of workshop (eg woodworking workshop, boat repair workshop, vehicle repair workshop, ...).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.176.1.77 (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Workshop tools

message: Would someone please create a redirect page from Backshop to this page?  70.247.175.157 (talk) 12:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backshop redirect 

message: I'm pretty sure I didn't do it right when I added the other definition of workshops. It would be great if somebody could make it conform to the standards. 72.54.76.211 (talk) 00:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't checked carefully yet, but most of the information about educational workshops that was recently added belongs on the disambiguation page, which is linked in the original hatnote.  There seems to be enough material to support a workshop (education) or workshop (event) page on its own, however.  I'm going to move most/all of the content to the relevant disambiguation page.  70.247.168.63 (talk) 03:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  educational workshops 

message: The hatnote, which has been at the top of this article for years, says the article is about mechanical engineering. Any editor is welcome to create additional articles about other kinds of workshops; a few such articles have already been created. See Workshop (disambiguation). The following text was removed, as it was off-topic. Someone may choose to use this text in another article. 
:During the "information era", a workshop describes an office or conference room meeting intended to create or generate plans, analysis, or design to support organizational efforts. Some people would differentiate a meeting from a workshop by suggesting that a meeting may contain an array of topics not dependent on each other in the sequence listed. For example, in a traditional "board of directors meeting", the treasurer's report appears early but it could be moved to one of the last items on the agenda without affecting other business of the meeting. Frequently workshops are focused on creating or delivering something (e.g., process improvement) and the sequence or order of the agenda items is critical to the development of the meeting output, frequently called a "deliverable".
Caseyjonz (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted text on "information era" workshop
Category talk:Scientific illustrators

message: This really isn't perfect, but there is a separate category for "illustrators" which is distinct from "artists" and treated as a subset of artists (artists by medium).  But scientific illustrators, of which medical illustrators should probably be a subset, is a unique field, not well-captured simply by talking about subject matter of art. Van Gogh, for instance, is listed as an artist whose subject is flowers, but he's not a scientific illustrator. For now, though, at least to get the information correctly available to the illustrator line of categories, I've added "scientific illustrators" to the relevant naturalistic art medium categories. --LQ 04:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.40.144 (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref
Talk:Yaodong

message: needs an image of the subject. Fig (talk) 20:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This article 

message: Shaanxi_Earthquake
yet no link here back to that article.  Not "green" enough an idea ?
G. Robert Shiplett 11:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  wp article on earthquake risk 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just made several modifications to this wikipedia page, please take some time and feel free to make more changes.
Here are changes I have made:
* Types 
Add more details about types of yaodong.
* constrcution
Add normal construction ways of different type of yaodong.
* further reading
Add two more helpful reading.
Cherrs,
Vacuum Dyson (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several sections modified 
Talk:Hans-Ekkehard Bob

message: I re-added the  tag because none of the four References is a reliable source.  Three books by the subject and a Flight Simulator fan page are not reliable sources.  User:Zoe|(talk) 03:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of references

message: You might be right Zoe, but please concider that the Page you mentioned includes Informations about the unit, JV 44. We are using quotes and details with agreement of the book author Robert Forsyth and Hans Ekkehard Bob himself. Also in use my own rsearch details that I have collected for more then 7 years. I do not plan to publish a book, nor do I have tendences to earn money with my research. I just want to share well researched details with the community.
In my opinion enough sources.........
:Please read WP:V and WP:RS.  Your personal research is original research and is not permitted in Wikipedia articles.  Neither are books published by the subject of the article.  I'm readding the tag.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: 

message: Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions or statements based on personal interviews. The article is unsourced and reads like a fan page. The page has lacked references since 2006 as noted above: Talk:Hans-Ekkehard_Bob#Lack_of_references. 
A de.wiki article exists, but is equally unconvincing for notability; not notable either as a soldier or an entrepreneur. Did not hold a significant command and topped out as Major. Successful completion of missions (sorties flown, # of enemy aircraft shot down, etc) is not part of SOLDIER. Please also see a note at  MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists.
K.e.coffman (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Federal Reserve Bank of New York

message: "largest regional Fed"? should that me longer than just "Fed"? 68.46.139.216
Isn't it closing in September? If so, shouldn't that be in the article? If not, shouldn't that statement be removed from the Federal Reserve article? 153.42.168.174 (talk) 11:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that was the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Buffalo Branch and it closed in Oct, 2008. Frank0051 (talk) 16:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would it be interresting or relevant to add that this bank was the subject of the movie Die Hard With A Vengeance?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.226.124.112 (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: Call or text me Johnjrigsby (talk) 02:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  grant 
Talk:Lana Clarkson

message: There's been a fair bit of vaccilation on this, but I'm not sure why. Spector was convicted of her murder. Speculations notwithstanding, my understanding is that we go by the court's decision. The section should be entitled 'Murder', right?  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 06:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The changes to "Murder" have been made by a blocked editor using various IP addresses to evade the block. Which is not to say that "Death" is correct, just that this isn't as controversial as it appears. GA-RT-22 (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I'll restore it to 'murder' as it should be.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section title 'death or 'murder'
Talk:Vash the Stampede

message: For such a noted anime character, this page is written in barely legible English.  I don't really know enough about the character to fix it, though.  --70.194.70.242 (talk) 00:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one seems to have done it yet and I have recently rewatched the anime and own the whole of the manga, I am preparing to do a substantial rewrite to this article. Smoothing over the language and information of most of the existing sections and greatly extending those dealing with the character's journey through the story as they are missing a lot of detail. Of course, it is possible that I take things too far the other way and use too much detail, as I am not yet clear on what level of detail is wished for in a page like this, so feel free to correct me on that. :) SpiritMuse (talk) 14:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: CC-BY-SA declaration; text in this section removed from the article by me; I've left it here in case its removal breaks any named refs.
 Director Satoshi Nishimura Meryl and Milly have when meeting hims and Meryl cannot believe the man travelling is the actual Vash. Those episodes are drawn from Meryl's point of view until the fifth from when Meryl realizes Vash is the gunner she often sees.
 Baffle☿gab 03:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text
Talk:Wes Mannion

message: In honor of Steve Irwin, I listen to the title TrueBlue an.Und I watch the video of his funeral service in Australia Zoo always the day he died on. His series were simply Klasse.Ich'll never forget Steve. Perhaps I have even the possibility to Australia to fly. Bernd Bandlow  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:1E00:1968:90A6:28C7:979B:602F (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2015 

message: I do not beleive that Wes works at the zoo since 2020 and he no longer appears on the Cricky Its The Irwins TV show. 2600:1010:B101:96B4:A1D0:E3B5:58CE:7B74 (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employment at Zoo
Talk:Kate Nauta

message: What is the use of having Kate Lynne "Katie" Nauta in the header? The article's name has it as "Kate", not Katie. Is she known as Katie or Kate? 82.141.95.68 (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Having "Katie" there implies that is her preferred stage name for all media, which isn't true, so I've rewritten the lead sentence. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katie? 
Talk:George Horton

message: The article on the book has been a quite short stub for quite some time, and I don't think, at least at its current state, it warrants a different article. It should be merged here. DenizTC 22:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This is far from a WP:Stub, rather a low-quality Start! --P64 (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:N-skeleton

message: : I'd assume this terminology can apply to polyhedrons and polytopes? Like a tetrahedron has a 0-skeleton as 4 points in space, a 1-skeleton as a 4 vertex, 6 edge complete graph, and 2-skeleton having the 4 faces. In general an n-skeleton of a polytope being composed of the n-faces of it?
: Partly I ask, having added a bunch of uncreated links: vertex arrangement, edge arrangement, face arrangement for different polytopes which share the same lower dimensional components. See Uniform polyhedron for examples. (Example cubohemioctahedron and cuboctahedron share the same edge arrangement or 1-skeleton). Tom Ruen 20:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polytopes 

message: I've done a little bit of undergrad mathematics and have a bit of an interest in learning more about things like topology and graph theory but I must confess I am having difficulty understanding what this article is talking about.
Could someone add more descriptive explanations of what the jargon actually means so that lay people can understand the article? I believe that this would significantly improve the quality of this article.
Also, if the content of the article could be related to real world applications of the mathematics (if any) that would also make the article more interesting and informative.
--I (talk) 05:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity of article could be improved 

message: The article misses the most important part: A precise mathematical definition, what an n-skeleton is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.201.13.222 (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition