lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rampage (DC Comics)

message: Sorry about the "merge" banner, I'm really requesting a move and I don't think there is a move banner.  I think at this point the Rampage persona has clocked up significantly less page-time than the Kitty Faulkner persona.  And with a noticible lack of world-class female scientists in the same class as The Atom, John Henry Irons, or Lex Luthor I think DC has been pushing the character's scientific credentials more.  Anyone else have a thought?D1Puck1T 17:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think more people know her as Rampage than they do as Kitty Faulkner. --Basique 02:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: There's nothing in the article about Kitty being eitehr bisexual or a lesbian. Something I remember Peter David touching on during his Supergirl run. --Basique 16:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lesbian 

message: I think I remember hearing that she was a She-Hulk pastiche. I'm not certain, and can't swear to it, but.. sort of fits. I wonder whether I should put it in. - CaptainKobold, 20/Jan 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.3.87 (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pastiche
Talk:Robert Treat Paine

message: Related to Thomas Paine?
I don't believe he is related to revolutionary Common Sense author Thomas Paine, but when you click on the name of his father, it leads you to the wrong Thomas Paine's page. Mdus5678 (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement with the link does not identify Thomas Paine as his father. Sundayclose (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Talk:William Findlater (Manitoba politician)

message: (aeropagitica)  (talk)  17:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ambulance LTD (EP)

message: What is all that stuff on the page which looks completly irrelavent...i don't know much about them so i have no idea what all of that is...could someone who knows something about the band have a look at this page and clean it up a bit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmotley (talk • contribs) 20:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arturo Tolentino

message: In the intro, it says that he is "more well known as the father of the Philippine "archipelagic doctrine", but the article never mentions it again. Things in the intro should be supported by things in the body of the article. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the "archipelagic doctrine"? 
Talk:The Leaving of Liverpool

message: The consensus of the discussion was keep.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  17:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leaving of Liverpool]]

message: "It was collected as a sailor's song, but recorded only twice, from the Americans Richard Maitland and Captain Patrick Tayluer" - this is a confusing sentence, particularly as it's followed by a list of artistes who've made audio recordings of the song. Is the sentence trying to claim that Maitland and Tayluer were the first people (independantly of each other) to write it down? Perhaps someone who has information about the history of this song could try and rework this sentence  ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The references explain in detail how the song was collected. 00:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Recorded"?

message: This article is too Americocentric - The "Origins" subsection of the song's history is simply relaying what happened with it after it was first heard in the U.S.  Those are not "Origins", those are merely details applicable to Americans' first contact with the song. RoyalNW1 (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "History"
Talk:WURFL

message: Should we have a separate page/section on WALL? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterbu (talk • contribs) 
That seems like a good idea. I may write that part. Time permitting... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Passani (talk • contribs) 
Big parts of this page concentrate on the commercial WURFL offerings and resembles advertisement, more than information that you would expect to see on an encyclopedia. All of these should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.156.13.108 (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: WALL

message: References have been added with citations for some claims.  Is this enough to remove the "no references" tag? Sax1johno (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. It's now . -- Trevj (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Template talk:Lockheed Martin

message: This template was created as an effort in Wikipedia Integration. Cwolfsheep 17:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: LM no longer has any connection to International Launch Services. I'l remove the entry in the template. (sdsds - talk) 02:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the space shuttle external fuel tank really an active project? 107.77.204.156 (talk) 03:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ILS
Talk:Marc Thomas (computer scientist)

message: Doesn't Marc have a computer science degree of some sort?
Would it be appropriate to have a section on current employment?
----
The article is, more or less, a mere list of publications of M.T. (let aside some references to personal interests and hobbies). There is not much elaborate content. I therefore marked it as "stub".
Further, I am concerned about Wikipedia:Notability. Not being a specialist to the field, I cannot fully judge whether the contributions of M.T. are notable enough to justify the encyclopedia entry. However, certain sections of the article certainly fail to be notable, in particular the "exposition" section. It links to some short textfiles about computer science topics, but these are not peer-reviewed publications (far from that) and certainly not notable content.
--193.170.117.39 11:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is really a gray area.  I agree that any old University professor shouldn't have their own page, but some of Dr. Thomas' work may distinguish him.  It could really go either way on this.  By the way, if I remember correctly, he has a doctorate from UC Berkley.  I don't, however, feel that I would be appropriate as an editor for this page as I am a former student of his and this may not work in the best interests of neutrality. 75.80.82.112 (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of NJ Transit railroad stations

message: Hello, we now have a new template for linking to stations, ! It means that now there is absolutely no need to type piped links into station articles! Check out its talk page for instructions. lensovet 22:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station name links 

message: This list should be reformatted. I recommend putting everything in alphabetical order, and using charts that include the lines and former railroads that used the stations, much like I tried to do with the SEPTA Regional Rail stations before somebody else beat me to that list. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:21, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: . Like the Metro-North station list, it needs work on the ADA station list, and a few other things, but I'm proud of what I've done. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  01:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformat this list 

message: List has been updated, references added, more context introduced, active-proposed stations separated, & appropriate subsections introduced. Numbering is manual, but additions will be infrequent. Djflem (talk) 08:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Since  NJT runs both bus and train train service, should article name (New Jersey Transit train stations or New Jersey Transit rail stations) reflect that it is about rail stations and not bus stations, such as those shown in template? Djflem (talk) 08:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Why isn't New Milford included on the list of stations closed by NJT? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not Mitch, but I think that's because New Milford station was closed before NJ Transit took over the PVL. The list appears to only include stations closed since NJ Transit took oevr operation in 1983. oknazevad (talk) 20:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen articles stating plans to close both New Milford and Fairmount Avenue at the same time. I suppose that New Milford could have closed before Fairmount, but I have seen no articles stating as such.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 20:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: From my understanding it did, with New Milford closing shortly before NJT took over and Fairmount almost a year later. But I haven't been able to verify that as yet. I have to dig out my copy of Jone's book on the line, which is in a box somewhere. oknazevad (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Milford station 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Complete list of NJ Transit stations. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete list of NJ Transit stations until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 11:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Complete list of NJ Transit stations" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Chasmatosuchus

message: Both The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals and the Paleobiology Database, the latter of which is edited by university professors, identify Chasmatosuchus as Chasmatosaurus, so these two articles should be merged as Chasmatosaurus. Jerkov 18:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure? I thought at least one species of Chasmatosaurus was found to be synonymous with Proterosuchus. Were the others referred to Chasmatosuchus? If not, both Chasmatosaurus and Chasmatosuchus are valid, though I imagine there's a larger taxonomic issue here somehere (isn't there always? ;) ).Dinoguy2 18:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. If they're both valid there doesn't need to be a merger between these articles, right? I might have jumped to conclusions too soon after seeing the similar names (there are also a Hesperosuchus and a Hesperosaurus, which are indeed seperate creatures), but it's still kinda suspicious since they're both in the same family. Are there any sources favoring suchus over saurus? 
EDIT- Just saw that there's also a Chasmatosuchus on Paleo DB. I think this means they are seperate genera; I'll remove the merger tag and add Chasmatosaurus to Proterosuchidae alongside Chasmatosuchus. Jerkov 18:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Chasmatosaurus
Talk:Chasmatosaurus

message: Both The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals and the Paleobiology Database, the latter of which is edited by university professors, identify Chasmatosuchus as Chasmatosaurus, so these two articles should be merged as Chasmatosaurus. Jerkov 18:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, forget all that. See Talk:Chasmatosuchus. Jerkov 11:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Chasmatosuchus 

message: This article currently states that Chasmatosaurus is synonymous with Proterosuchus. Do we have a reference for this? If so, is a redirect in order? Firsfron of Ronchester 02:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with ''Proterosuchus''?

message: The paleofile.com lists Chasmatosaurus as a synonym of Proterosuchus and not the other way around:
Genus: Proterosuchus BROOM, 1903
= Chasmatosaurus HAUGHTON, 1924
= Champsosaurus ROMER, 1971/COPE, 1887 (sic)
= Elaphrosuchus BROOM, 1946
P. fergusi BROOM, 1903, CRUICKSHANK, 1970 (Type)
= Chasmatosaurus vanhoepeni HAUGHTON, 1924 (Type)
= Proterosuchus vanhoepeni (HAUGHTON, 1924) CRUICKSHANK, 1970
= Chasmatosaurus van Hoepeni HUENE, 1926 (sic)
= Elaphrosuchus rubidgei BROOM, 1946 (per CRUICKSHANK, 1970)
= Chasmatosaurus alexanderi HOFFMAN, 1965
P. yuani (YOUNG, 1936) CRUICKSHANK, 1970
= Chasmatosaurus yuani YOUNG, 1936
P. ultimus (YOUNG, 1964) CRUICKSHANK, 1970
= Chasmatosaurus ultimus YOUNG, 1964
= Chasmatosaurus yuani YOUNG, 1958 (partim)
BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA and EVANS also name Proterosuchus as a valid genus in BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA, M. and EVANS, S.E. A basal archosauriform from the Early Triassic of Poland Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48 (4): 649-652 (2003), though here it is mentioned as Proterosuchus (Charig and Sues 1976).Elatrin (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 

message: I see that there has been a lot of confusion here on the validity of Chasmatosaurus. Chasmatosaurus is a junior synonym of Proterosuchus, with all species of Chasmatosaurus having been reassigned to Proterosuchus. According to Welman (1998), C. vanhoepeni and C. alexandri are junior synonyms of P. fergusi. C. yuani is now considered to be its own species of Proterosuchus, although I can't find out where this was first published. In the past, Chasmatosaurus was considered a subjective synonym, but now it is not. Therefore, I think this article should be redirected to Proterosuchus. If there's no objections, I'll go ahead and do so, and also add more information on taxonomy in the Proterosuchus article with some references. As it is, the Chasmatosaurus article talks mostly about general morphology and behavior, which can also apply to other proterosuchids. 
Ref: Welman, J. (1998). "The Taxonomy of the South African Proterosuchids (Reptilia, Archosauromorpha)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18 (2): 340-347.
Smokeybjb (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Synonymy with ''Proterosuchus''
Talk:Buchanan bus station

message: Someone took the pains to redirect from 'Buchanan Street Bus Station' but the article makes no mention of bus station before it was overhauled in '77. No explanation of when and why the name was changed.
That article is therefore fundamentally misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.74 (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a dreadful article. 

message: On the info box on the right it says that there are:
Annual Passengers: 12,927,690 and Annual Departures: 564,553.
And, the article itself says there are:
Daily Passengers: 40,000 and Daily Departures: 1,700
But, 12927690/40000 = 323 days worth of travel, and 564553/1700 = 332 days worth of travel.
Obviously there is a major conflict of figures here, think this needs to get fixed.
--Arossmorrison (talk) 09:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage Statistics Conflict 
Talk:Girls Aloud: Off the Record

message: Any ratings information for the show?--Cooly123 20:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Paige Davis

message: She married a Mr Page - this presumably now makes her Paige Page..... - ChrisTheDude 09:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She has chosen to keep her Maiden name to keep that from happening. --Hourick 04:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Too bad, I could have started a website called "The Paige Page Page."--Kento 12:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage

message: Added current work, but will eventually need an expansion once she starts working more. --Hourick 04:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of current work.  

message: At the level of precedent, it's not a good thing to have well-sourced material relevant to a public figure's public conduct, along with potential or claimed impact on that figure's career, removed, along with (dubious) legal threats. User Carrystory deleted material relating to Paige Davis' conduct at the Broadway AIDS benefit, although each item was sourced to publications of wide distribution, and counterclaims were also duly given.
Now, I have no interest in the subject of Paige Davis (I wouldn't have known who she was if I hadn't random-surfed the article), but this is very bad wikipractice. The section deleted in mid-July should, I think, be restored for the integrity of the article. At the very least, there should be discussion as to how the deleted material relates to Wikipedia policies on the biographies of living persons. Should the deleted material be restored? DavidOaks (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's nice to have someone else notice. I have felt all along that the deletion was unjustified, and worked hard to source the material before restoring it the first time, but when the user you mention kept deleting it — with, as you observe, legal claims that are dubious at best given the sourcing — I decided to let it go for the time being rather than get into a personal edit war. Obviously I would favor restoring it. (Besides, her claim that being dismissed was unrelated to the issues mentioned is certainly underscored by the fact that they just announced they're bringing her back to the show. :)  Lawikitejana (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 
Talk:Seicho-no-Ie

message: Changed translation of Seicho-No-Ie from "The Home of Infinite Life, Wisdom and Abundance" to "The Home of Infinite Life", as 生長 does not mean "Wisdom" nor "Abundance" but only "Long Life".210.160.15.16 18:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Strand, Western Cape

message: "The great coastal road that makes its way up the eastern seaboard of the Cape rises into the coastal ranges from near The Strand."
The name is Strand, therefore I have changed this part. The fact that people refer to this place as "The Strand" is not so much the case anymore as it gains more and more popularity and people become aware of the place's name. I know this is not such big a deal, however I want this article as factual as possible. --Scotteh 18:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:The Test Dream

message: Barking Dog & Rising Sun
SPOILER:
My thoughts retain to the ending when it fades to black, while Tony and Carmela talk about the neighbor's barking dog and the soon to be rising sun. I believe the dog represents the threat of Johnny Sack's crew, unrelentless after the murders by Tony B; meanwhile the rising sun represents the new day when the nervous Tony, who is "unprepared" for his job as stated several times during the episode, must face the consequences of his cousin's actions. Any thoughts on this?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bheyden (talk • contribs) 22:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

message: no spoiler warning before episode recap!
:Fixed. Please sign your posts on discussion boards using 4 tildes (~). If you need it in future the tag is 
Thats Spoilers with two of these { before and two of these } afterwards with no spaces.
--Opark 77 23:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler Tagging 

message: Why is the caller on the phone in the hotel room identified as "Carmine talking telling him they have a job for him"?
It is clearly not his voice on the line, and Tony wouldn't be taking orders from Carmine anyway.
66.92.65.110 (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice on the phone 

message: --71.52.135.179 (talk) 02:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I LOVE U
Talk:G&D's Ice Cream Cafe

message: Suggest moving this page to "G&D's" or "G&D's ice cream cafes". 'George and Davis' only refers to the Little Clarendon Street shop; both George and Danver and George and Davis are part of teh same chain/company/whatever, and most importantly everyone refers to G&D's as G&D's. Stannered 18:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, it's been over a year now, according to their web site, they are G&D's, name should be changed to that, so i will be updating it,  cheers ∞ Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: PeaceThruSuperiorFirepower, first of all welcome to Wikipedia. Please take a look at WP:CITE, Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Claims such as "I was there", whilst they may be true, can be made by anyone regardless of the truth; it is completely unverifiable. As you have challenged the factoid that the shop was named after George and his dog, I've removed it from the article pending finding verifiable sources for the information. If you can find a citation from a reliable source regarding the Davis Roberts theory, you of course are welcome to add your information back to the article. Thanks, Stannered (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of whether Davis Roberts was involved in setting up G&D's, what he has done since is of no relavence. If he was involved, then it would be appropriate to have a citation that says so; see Verifiability. Stannered (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Davis Roberts 

message: An unusual thing about G&Ds is that it's open until midnight (source). I think it's notable enough to warrant inclusion, partly because it's an unusual practice for a British cafe, and partly because it's been a contributing factor to the cafe's success over the years. Whereabouts in the article could it be mentioned, though? Ubermammal (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should be included; personally I'd put it at the end of the first paragraph in the History section. Stannered (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening times
Talk:James Badge Dale

message: Badge bears an uncanny resemblance to Timothy Redwine. If they were not born some years apart, they could be taken for twins. Das Baz 18:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I used to babysit Badge. He was born in New York City. Anniesantafe (talk) 23:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not born in Beverly Hills
Category talk:Bishops of the Episcopal Church (United States)

message: It seems redundant to list Episcopal bishops in the American Episcopalians category. As I moved people from "Episcopalians" to "American Episcopalians", I removed the bishops from the list. They are accessible as a subcategory. Thank you.Rockhopper10r 18:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Archbishop of Mount Sinai and Raithu

message: Hmm... is that Copyright notice needed there? -- ReyBrujo 18:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been deleted. Physchim62 (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:List of High School! Kimengumi episodes

message: If someone knows a good page listing the airdates, please post it here. I just moved and can't find my book that has them. Thanks! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I finally found a list that had all but two of them. If anyone can find that information, it would be greatly appreciated. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Airdates

message: I do not believe the comment that the movie has not been released on video. I remember seeing it as a VHS tape listed on various Japanese auctions. If I can find one that's still up, I'll post a link here for reference. Also, I do know for certain that it was released on VHS as a fansub.Alcy 16:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fansubs don't count as a commercial release, which is what I was implying with the statement. I've clarified it so you can't misunderstand it. I've done several extensive searches for any video release of the movie, and I have yet to find anything. That's not to say one doesn't exist, but until it can be proven to exist, I want to leave the statement as is. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I'll do some digging to find out. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie
Talk:Sint-Lievens-Houtem

message: Is anyone from Sint-Lievens-Houtem here? There are a bunch of nuts creating nonsense articles about Polgbroekstraat, Eiland an Cotthem at this English Wikipedia? It is time to stop this nonsense! User_talk:Pan_Gerwazy--pgp 18:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/2123

message: Why were pages merged when there was no consensus, and voters likely didn't even look at articles like 2240, which survived it's first VfD when voters did actually look at the page? -- Jeandré, 2006-06-17t18:43z
:This lack of consistency is a concern here and this is not the first time this is happening. --Siva1979Talk to me 04:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)