lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Duke of Orléans

message: Having a problem placing a link to a research of the Royal House of Orleans. Can anyone fix it?  Tancarville 5-11-04 7.47pm (EST)
*I cant do it either and its the right way! Thats odd. muriel@pt 08:56, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004

message: My understanding is that the comte de Paris today is considered to be the heir to the 1661 creation, as have all his predecessors as pretender.  He doesn't use this title, which he allows relations to use as a courtesy title, but he is considered to be duc d'Orléans in the same way that, say, Victor-François, 8th duc de Broglie is considered to be the duc de Broglie.  As such, the list of the 1661 creation should perhaps not include Ferdinand Philippe (who used the title as a courtesy title, not as a substantive duke of Orléans), but include the duc de Guise and the two most recent comtes de Paris (who did not use the title, but hold it as a substantive title).  Those who have used the title as a courtesy title could be listed in another part of the article.  Thoughts? john k (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. A good source on this is here. Lethiere (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern day 

message: If the Dukes of Orléans really are assigned ordinals, why isn't the son of Philip II called Louis IV? Surtsicna (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because numbering restarted with the 1661 grant.  The point is not logic, but tradition. john k (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have noticed that Wikipedia articles about the dukes of the 1661 grant tend to avoid the ordinals. Most notably, Philippe I, Duke of Orléans, is mentioned as Philippe I only in the title of the article. That's what actually prompted my question. Surtsicna (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not much reason to use the ordinals in running text except when we need to explicitly disambiguate. Even then, we don't necessarily need to, as, for example, in Philippe I's article we'd probably usually refer to his son and eventual successor as the Duke of Chartres, rather than as Philippe II. john k (talk) 16:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the ordinal is unneccessary in running text but the lead sentence calls him Philippe de France and the infobox calls him Philippe; succession boxes in other articles refer(red) to him as Philippe de France. The ordinal seems to be generally ignored, even by the French Wiki. Surtsicna (talk) 16:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering 

message: The article says that Gaston was created duke of Orléan on 1626 by his father Henry IV. This is impossible as Henry IV died in 1610. Scafloc (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Gaston duke of Orléan
Talk:Waikanae

message: "The glistening of the mullet"? I thought that would have been West Auckland! ;) Grutness
Yeah I’ve been told otherwise that it is "The waters of the yellow eyed mullet" which I’ve updated but I’m a bit unsure as there seems multiple meanings on the net.. For instance quoted here: http://www.enterprisecoastnz.com/our_region/history/maori_legends/ - it is said to mean "Waters that stare wildly". But "wai" does mean water and "kanae" literally means mullet. AntiBodies
:According to maoridictionary.co.nz, 'kanae' is the grey mullet, Mugil cephalus.-gadfium 03:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Mullet
Talk:Gert Bolmer

message: I think there  needs to be an explanation of a Grade 2 (Equestrian) Disability.
   
I know there are 4 grades of disability for equestrian events at the Paralympics:
 
Grade 1: Severely disabled riders with cerebral palsy, les autres and spinal cord injury.  
Grade 2: Athletes with reasonable balance and abdominal control including amputees.    
Grade 3: Athletes with good balance, leg movement and coordination including blind athletes.   
Grade 4: Ambulant (able to walk independently) athletes with either impaired vision or impaired arm or leg function.
  
 
But do they apply to all equestrian events, or just to the Paralympics.
 
Maybe we need a complete list of Paralympic categories? Martin TB 12:39, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Bazentin Ridge

message: The article seems to deal exclusively with the British point of view... isn't there any German source about this battle? --Gengis Gat (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed a few duplicate links with the tool.Keith-264 (talk) 10:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic bias 

message: As above. Keith-264 (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of which battle of the Somme? 

message: Let's not be dogmatic when there are only a few items under a header. Keith-264 (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: They're easier to read and easier to edit. I see no downside to them. DuncanHill (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Easier to read? Keith-264 (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Larger and clearer type. DuncanHill (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Real" Subheadings?
Talk:African swallow

message: African swallow was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
I cant believe this article still exists! It was written a fair while ago, and no-one has added to it. What does everyone think? (User:Iamalegend)
*Which will get deleted faster, an African Swallow or a European Swallow? Is there actually a type of swallow referred to as an african swallow? If so, could someone add details to this article, otherwise make it a redirect to Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Darksun 10:54, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert B. Charles

message: I have no idea if the information presented here is correct, but I must take exception to the style.An encyclopedia article should have a certain timeless element. How will this article read in twenty years time? RBC was in which administration? When was he appointed? When did he say what he said?
This article needs much work. As I am not an expert in the subject, I cannot lend a hand, only complain. 
[[PaulinSaudi 13:37, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Bobby? Oh please... Sounds like it was written by his secretary.
76.250.61.95 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Jade MacRae

message: How can she have started learnign the piano at age 3 and at age 8? This is a bad article to have on the front page, as it makes no f'n sense! --MAdaXe 13:39, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I will perform the requested merge, moving the contents of this page to the other page; Macrae's official website and myspace do not capitalize the "r". Jlittlet 01:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
MediaWiki talk:1movedto2

message: I'm considering changing the text from "$1 moved to $2" to "moved $1 to $2". Because the page move is displayed as "<username> <original page> moved to <new page>" in the contributions, it is sometimes easy to accidentally think that the username is part of the original name. What do you think? --Ixfd64 21:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.Rich   Farmbrough 21:23, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I concur. «»Who?¿?meta 22:29, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree, and have taken the liberty of implementing it.  violet/riga (t) 22:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I too agree with your decision in implementing it. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't this be updated into Betawiki? --Steinninn 11:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  considering a change 

message: :This discussion has been moved to Wikipedia:MediaWiki messages#MediaWiki:1movedto2. --David Göthberg (talk) 10:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also MediaWiki:Allmessages, MediaWiki:Anonymous, MediaWiki:Badfilename, and MediaWiki:Badipaddress. Anyone care to run an automated sweep for these messages and list them all, if it's possible? -- as 208.124.86.54 (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this discussion to Wikipedia:MediaWiki messages#MediaWiki:1movedto2, since it now concerns many messages. --David Göthberg (talk) 10:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete? 

message: 2606:6000:6542:A500:5D81:21EF:27B8:A0AC (talk) 02:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: empty request — xaosflux Talk 05:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 7 May 2018 

message: X– References with the same content
 X– Multiple references with the same name
 –x Usage of undefined named references
Remove all Dungeonhole (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: this is unclear, and isn't in the correct format for creating that page. — xaosflux Talk 12:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 31 March 2024
Talk:Block code

message: This was marked for speedy deletion. I doubt that it qualifies for that. 
Charles Matthews 13:48, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No answer sofar. I will now in the article make the distinction more clearly between the practical and the theoretical definition. Bob.v.R 17:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments originally with no section title

message: This article lacks important information, and some of that it provides is incorrect. Nageh (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Template 

message: How is the Distance of two Blockcodes defined?
What is the Distance of (2,0) and (0,0)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.140.251.84 (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance d of two Blockcodes 

message: * Atri Rudra, CSE545 Error Correcting Codes: Combinatorics, Algorithms and Applications, State University of New York at Buffalo.
* P Vijay Kumar, Error Correcting Codes, Available on-line,  Video lectures, Lecture notes
The "Notes" section was removed: the CSE545 is not a published source, the Kumar Video and Notes links were non-responsive. Rgdboer (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: A non-terminated convolutional encoder would be an example of a non-block (unframed) code, which has memory and is instead classified as a tree code.
Wikipedia lacks tree code.  The following reference struck me as succinct: 
* ECE8771 Information Theory & Coding for Digital Communications — Prof. Kevin M. Buckley — Lecture Set 3 Convolutional Codes
Generally, we consider encoders which generate an output stream of codeword symbols from an input stream of data symbols. The resulting code is termed a tree code. A trellis code, which can be represented with a trellis, is a tree code with a finite-state encoder whose states depend only on a finite number of past input symbols. A trellis code that adheres to certain linearity properties is termed a convolutional code.
How about a tree code section in the trellis page, which this article could then link to? My math is a little too rusty to take this edit on myself with any surety. — MaxEnt 02:31, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tree code MIA
Talk:Enochian

message: Is it possible for someone to re-create the symbol....... because I can.....on paper at that.....no computer assistance 2601:153:880:A3F0:FDCF:43CB:6191:FF50 (talk) 00:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geometrical symbol 

message: What it says in the title. Why is this page simply called "Enochian", and not "Enochian language", to disambiguate it from Enochian magic and other Wikipedia articles also starting with the word "Enochian"? I feel that just calling the page "Enochian" would be confusing for readers. Obversa (talk) 02:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this page not titled "Enochian language" for disambiguation?
Talk:Tucker Carlson

message: I think I found an offically verified record for the plane crash which Tucker Carlson was on. The record also contains a lot of detailed information about the flight. The information Tucker gave matches all the information in the record. As I am currently unable to edit the article, I ask someone who can to add this source to the relevant section (third paragraph under "Career"). Thanks. CyberOne25 (talk) 20:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plane crash source 

message: In the section "Vladimir Putin interview" there is a "Citation needed"-Template. The bbc.com/news/world-europe-68223148 source after the following sentence does give the needed citation: "outspoken defender of Mr Putin since the war began". This is literally in the text, at least in the 20240222164654 Internet Archive version. You may delete this Talk thread after solving the "Citation needed" in the Wikipedia article. --2003:6:33AE:3D51:B446:1EC7:749:9951 (talk) 13:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Citation needed" can be solved easily
Talk:PNS Hangor (S131)

message: Please make claims which are supported by evidence, Kripan was not fatally damaged, otherwise it wouldn't have made it back to the harbour. One-sided presentations don't  bring any glory to any one. (supporting that Kripan was not damaged as claimed here : Orbat.com 1971 War, Bharat-Rakshak).
:The above are one sided, they are Indian sources! here is a neutral source; which says that the Kirpan was damaged;
Global Security
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/pakistan/hangor.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.152.22 (talk) 19:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: explain the operation of hangor for class 2400:ADC1:402:8200:8D5B:B8FC:E115:A133 (talk) 09:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  hangor
Talk:Libertarian League

message: You all are invited to visit and comment on a draft for a RfC on this and related articles that will eventually likely become a poll. Please remember we are not discussing the topic itself, just the suitable neutral number of issues we want to cover. --Improv 17:13, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft for a RfC on the issue 

message: There's no obvious vandalism. Please discuss first and stop reverting, or you run the risk of getting banned. Mgm|(talk) 13:36, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
Anon users (172.188.198.168 & 208.62.52.1), this is pointless. Put a comment on the Talk page if you feel strongly about your edits, but for the moment you are breaking Wikipedia's three revert rule...  — Asbestos | Talk 13:49, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: These two are completely familiar with the 3RR, as they've both been blocked for violating it. RadicalSubversiv E 13:55, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert war 

message: I realize this may not be the ideal place to raise this but it seemed close enough. There was also an organization with the above captioned name that existed in the US between 1949 and around 1956. Bloomberg University just posted some of their newspapers, Socialist Monthly, online. Perhaps a page on the LSL could be started? The leading figure was a person named Vogel. Does anybody know anything about this? Rmalhotr 21:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Libertarian Socialist League
Talk:Lead ship

message: Cleaned it up some. Any other ideas for expansion?--In ur base, killing ur dorfs 14:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

message: US Navy practice on battleships seems to have been to name the class for the first ship designed, irregardless of actual launch or commission date, but that some navies name a class for the first ship of that class actually launched or commissioned even if another vessel in that class was the master design. So depending on reference source, the lead ship of a class sometimes may be the first ship of that class designed, launched or commissioned. Naaman Brown (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming Conventions

message: Is there any reference to another Super Star Destroyer other than the Eclipse? I havn't watched the movies (hate SW, love ST), but the Executor is the only one I know of. -Samnuva (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Wars Reference

message: I've added "name ship" to the definition of synonyms as the page redirects here.  I am not sure if this is a good, or proper, addition, so please check.174.3.125.23 (talk) 00:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "name ship"/"name-ship"
Talk:Livno

message: There are two officially recognized spellings in BiH!--Špajdelj (talk) 19:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Livno and Ливно
Talk:Schmitt's Gay

message: Schmitt's Gay was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE
Pretty funny Saturday Night Live sketch which parodies models in beer ads by presenting "the other gender." But I don't think every commercial parody on the show needs an individual article. Delete. Ian Pugh 15:21, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't know about Saturday Night Live opening commercial--if the content is kept, refactor that from a list, to a description of the subject parodys, IE merge/redir all the ones that have articles and remove links for those that don't. If it gets too big in the future, particularly notable ones can be broken out. Niteowlneils 22:09, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Peeping Tom (disambiguation)

message: peeping tom is wack theres no good information about a real peeping tom the one who be in peoples windows trying to assult them!!!!!!!!!!!! ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.59.92 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 5 November 2004
:I believe the legend of Peeping Tom was invented several centuries after the time of Godiva, so I wouldn't lend any credence to it. Lee M 02:20, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Blind
Template talk:Infobox university

message: For some universities, the former names include a long list of different names. The length of the former name list may even be equal to or longer than the half space of the whole content in the infobox. For this situation, it is not appropriate to put the former name list in the infobox，as it will significantly damage the readability of remaining important information in the infobox. We should make it an option to either include the former name or not. Jianghaizhi (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Having so many former names that it would bloat the infobox seems like a rare situation. But in the event that that is indeed the situation, editors absolutely have the discretion to not include them. Sdkb talk 23:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

text: The parameter is already optional and, as Sdkb says, editors have the discretion to not include all former names. I'm not sure what you're asking for here. Robminchin (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: They are here because of an dispute at University of North Texas. There is an open discussion in the Talk page - you're welcome to weigh in there in that specific context. ElKevbo (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make the former name an optional but not required field in infobox 

message: Hello, I was wondering if anyone else would support adding a tuition field to this infobox? I think a lot of people looking at universities on Wikipedia would want to be able to quickly see that. We could add an in-state tuition and out-of-state tuition box. Any feedback? Hannahthom7 (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems like it might be a good idea. It might be better done as two definable labels, as "in-state" and "out-of-state" are US-specific (the UK equivalents would be "home" and "international", for example). Would we want to also include fees for (post-)graduate courses? At that point things could easily become complex with different fee levels for different schools. Robminchin (talk) 21:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

text: No thanks. This is way too complex and ever-changing to be appropriately captured in the infobox as has been discussed many time (in the Talk page archives). ElKevbo (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not add this field. It would be highly misleading, because a large proportion of people do not pay the nominal tuition rate, and the true cost of attending a university or college often includes housing and meals and other fees that are not accounted for in a standard way. We run the risk of having outside people saying inaccurate things like "According to Wikipedia, it costs $60,000 per year to attend Foo University." – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding a tuition field 

message: for update the logo of JE Mondejar Foundation College MMS2024 (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Please provide a link to the new image. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 30 May 2024
Talk:Vincent Tan

message: Note that part of the edit history is on Tan Sri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun (now a redirect here); content from there was merged into this article. Noel (talk) 16:17, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have now twice reverted additions making Tan's ownership of this football team into a major focus of the article. This is undue weight; he also owns another football team, and in terms of his business ventures, this particular team is not a major thing. It's more important in the article on the team. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cardiff City FC

message: His Instagram is Tyler_tannn  James Jennings (talk) 11:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyler Tan 

message: I believe I have found his Instagram it is Tyler_Tannn - how do I make this known to others that want to view his social media James Jennings (talk) 09:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to Template:Instagram for the placement of Instagram in a biographical article in Wikipedia. Chongkian (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyler Tan
Talk:List of forms of government

message: Should we add "Peasant Republic" to the list of Republics? 72.53.87.227 (talk) 12:03, 24 Nov 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peasant Republic? 

message: per MOS:OVERLINK countries should not be linked but they are throughout this article Edward Jocob Philip Smith (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries are linked 

message: Forms of government 2409:4055:494:D07E:0:0:D49:88AD (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  S sci
Talk:Army group

message: how many people are in one army group? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.95.224.73 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 5 November 2004  (UTC)
:An Army Group consists of only a Headquarters, and nothing more, so its staffing should be in line with that of an Army Headquarters, a Corps Headquarters, of a Division Headquarters. SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 22:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Staffing