Talk:Krasnodar Krai

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bandera de Nakhitxevan.svg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Krasnodar Krai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120709001832/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/08/putin-flood-russia-death-toll to http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/08/putin-flood-russia-death-toll
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The latter half of the History section seems very poorly written, and I could try to clean up some of it but some sentences like: "Before the October Revolution of 1917, most of the territory of modern Kuban-Krasnodar territory occupied area, formed in 1860 from the Black Sea Cossack Army, the western part of the Caucasus Line Cossack troops" I'm not quite sure what it's trying to say at all, and I don't know enough about the area to figure it out. --Jessietail (talk) 03:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's best to leave it until editors who know the subject clean it up. The only way to do so is to work through the edit history and see when any given section and content was added (plus any changes made to it by other users). I suspect that most of the content has been taken from other language Wikipedias, clumsily translated, but not referenced (if there were non-English references to back up the content in the original article/s in the first place). I'll keep it on my radar to pick through some time soon. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked through the history and it's always been the same as it is now. I looked closer and the entire section was apparently added as it is today all at once in . I checked the Russian pages for it from around that time, and sure enough many of the sentences from them auto-translate into almost exactly the same semi-nonsense sentences here. I guess someone who can translate Russian more accurately needs to rewrite that section, probably translating and citing the sources used on those pages or something. --Jessietail (talk) 04:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for looking into it (and pinpointing the diff for me)! I'll check the old version against this one, try to find the refs, and translate it appropriately when I find a moment. I'll also check against the the current Russian Wikipedia article. There are plenty of reliable sources listed for that article, so I should be able to improve this article from there. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section poorly written