lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edmond Jurien de La Gravière

message: But page is currently missing its edit button. Is it protected or just a glitch?
Regardless, his father, the Admiral Jurien de la Graviere, should be linked through, even if there is no content at the page yet. — LlywelynII 20:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure why
Talk:Nicolas Durand de Villegaignon

message: Please cite your sources. LordAmeth 22:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPMILHIST assessment 
Talk:Anne's House of Dreams

message: I haven't read this novel but wonder: As the novel was published before the end of the First World War, does it really cover Anne's life "shortly after the First World War"? Victoriagirl 21:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what the article said at the time you wrote your note, but it presently says that the series of books covers that time period. --Lawikitejana 13:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The era isn't mentioned in the article at present, but this particular novel is definitely dated by the success of the Liberals (Grits) in the election of 1896, after eighteen years of Conservative rule. The novel thus covers from August 1894 (Anne's wedding) to October 1896. The last book of the series, Rilla of Ingleside, is set at the time of the First World War. Robina Fox 06:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This story is one of the more complex ones in the series and has some serious themes. It is among my favorites, but I haven't re-read it in the last two years and am afraid I won't do it justice. Could someone else start a summary? (It would need the spoiler template for sure.) I know that it should include a discussion of Leslie, Dick, and Owe'n; the story of the original occupants of the house; Miss Cornelia and the Captain; and baby Joy. This book also is the opener, now that I come to write this, of the part of the series that focuses on the Blythe family: HOD, AOI, RV, ROI. So if we did a good run-through of the people and themes, it could be used as the base for the summaries of those books as well. --Lawikitejana 13:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Storyline needed

message: I'm not clear on copyright law, but I've heard that books written before a certain year pass into the public domain. Could someone indicate which of the Anne books are public domain now? --Uncle Ed (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright status
Talk:Merton Priory

message: This page currently references the 'Statutes of Merton'.  As far as I am aware there is only one - I have just created a page for it (Statute of Merton).  If anyone can inform me of others please let me know.  For now I'm changing it to Statute of Merton. Jameshfisher 21:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statutes of Merton? 
Talk:Mater

message: ' also is a formal term for mother. I think there should be a disambiguation page, although I don't know how to create.Jahenderson 21:57, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jahenderson, you should see Cars. I first thought it was lame when I saw the trailer, but it's great! ANNAfoxlover 21:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No merge necessary.  Mater is a major character from a significant film and should have his own entry.Rhindle The Red 15:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Since we're now adjusting all the pictures to a particular size, Mater's picture seems rather small. Could we get a picture of him on his own? The same can be said for Fillmore and Ramone, among others. RMS Oceanic 22:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to find better pictures, since this is exactly what I want as well. Have you seen Luigi's picture? You can barely see him! Anyway, I'll try to get everyone a better picture by Valentine's Day 2007, if no one else wants to do this for me. ANNAfoxlover 21:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It's me again, ANNAfoxlover, and I've come up with some pretty good pictures for the cars. How do you like them? ANNAfoxlover 23:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Pic? 

message: In the Spanish version (to Europe), Mater is named MATE, like  Tomate (tomatoe in english, tomate in spanish) and also in Catalan version: the name is MATA, from Tomata (tomatoe). His name is'nt Molcador.
Annabet —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.82.148.77 (talk) 23:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mate 

message: Please, whoever you are.  If you cannot back up your statements that you are continually re-adding to this article, please stop.  If anyone else can back up the things he/she has been adding, please do so.  I'm getting tired of this. Rhindle The Red 14:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WHY IN THE WORLD ARE YOU GOING TO STUPID DISNEY FOR INFORMATION ON A Pixar FILM???????????? PIXAR WAS THE ONE THAT MADE THE STORY, ANIMATION, AND EVERYTHING ELSE!!! Disney had nothing to do with any Pixar films except for marketing! DISNEY IS STUUUUPID!!!! Thanks for listening. ANNAfoxlover 23:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with what Anna said, but not as vehemently as that. (Disney is not Pixar.) dogman15 03:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 24.63.203.132

message: Maybe is worth to mention that Mater is one of the few cars that know how to perform an opposite lock steering (as seen on Mater and the Ghostlight), along with McQueen and Doc Hudson. --Manuel Cuevas 17:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposite lock steering

message: Mater befriends Lightning McQueen and wants to ride a helicopter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.155.0 (talk) 00:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mater from Cars
Talk:Salix babylonica

message: Are weeping willow trees dangerous around septic tanks and fill lines? Just planted one and the neighbour says we will have problems with the septic and fill lines now due to the tree having fast and long spreading roots.
A weeping willow was recently found to have a trunk circumference of 322 inches (817 cm). This tree is growing in Detroit, Michigan.
Michigan Big Tree Hunt
Musicwriter (talk) 03:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Should mention that the weeping willow was a symbol of funeral mourning in past centuries... AnonMoos (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: symbolism

message: This article says that S. babylonica grows in dry areas of northern China.  They have naturalized and grow wild here in western West Virginia and are only found along streams, creeks, ponds, and the Ohio and Kanawha Rivers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:23FF:3CF0:0:0:0:34 (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The naturalized trees are not likely to be the true species, which is not cold tolerant, but hybrids; see the thread below. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Growing Conditions
Category talk:Galicia (Spain) geography stubs

message: This category was originally deleted after being nominated at SfD on 3 December 2005. It was later recreated on 29 April 2006 as a split from the spain-geo-stub (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive23). Road Wizard 22:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreation

message: This category should not be speedy deleted as being unpopulated, because it was moved by CFD but the populating template was not updated. --Timrollpickering 17:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:BMW K100

message: Does the BMW K75 or BMW K100 justify a separate article? I would say no -- and would recommend that the K75 and K100 (and whatever else may apply) be moved to the BMW motorcycles article in the K Series section. (Wiki writer 22:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is This an Article? 

message: Hi there - Just found this article for the first time and having done some basic formatting like adding a first line, I went ahead and put a rudimentary structure in place - It's not ideal and hopefully people will adjust it and improve it, but it puts the foundations in place to make a tidier article. Cheers all Vwozone (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New structure 

message: <discussion>
The more I read about the BMW K75, the more I get the impression that, while the K75's engine is a three-cylinder engine developed from the K100 engine, the K75 motorcycle is just the K100 motorcycle with the K75 engine installed in place of the K100 engine. As such, I propose that the K75 article be merged into the K100 article, with the K75 being treated as a variant of the K100.
The development of the K75 engine, the introduction and discontinuation of the K75, and information on the models offered would probably be the most important information to be carried across or included. The concept of the K75, and the features other than the engine and the parts that differ between the models, would already be covered in the K100 article. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 01:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: BMW K75 into BMW K100 

message: I propose to restore this version https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_K75&oldid=642362370 of the page and division the K75 to like do other wiki, because isn't the same motorbike and have some many peculiar characteristic and technical specific. Some many notable sources talking about this bike . If will be opposite, do the restoring. 5.90.238.254 (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split BMW K75
Talk:BMW K75

message: Does the BMW K75 or BMW K100 justify a separate article? I would say no -- and would recommend that the K75 and K100 (and whatever else may apply) be moved to the BMW motorcycles article in the K Series section. (Wiki writer 22:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The removed passage (not that it matters now...): "There was some erronious information on this page that has been edited (1-10-2007).  I will attempt to enlist the help of those on the yahoo kbmw list to ensure its accuracy and completeness." - the editor's username or IP can be found, but I won't look. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is This an Article?
Talk:Luc-Julien-Joseph Casabianca

message: Made a correction, based on spellling. I do not believe that "ensign" is a rank in the French Naval Service, and it was spelled wrong as well. Unless I am much mistaken M. Casabianca was promoted from an enlisted rank to an aspirant (midshipman) and to LT of vessel, and so on.... Please correct me if I am mistaken... 14:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ensign? 

message: So he went from aspirant to Enseigne de vaisseau and then Lt. de vaisseau... so I'll fix my own mistake. The spelling was still wrong.. Cheers V. Joe 14:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oops 

message: This article's body text begins with its subject's naval career.  There is nothing about his parents, birthplace, upbringing, or schooling.  There is more about the (mostly fictional) poem about his son than his real family.  Surely somebody as important as this is not a complete mystery (and if he is, the article should say so). --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life?
Talk:André Boniface Louis Riqueti de Mirabeau

message: According to the article about the Prussian army, this was said by Friedrich von Schrötter.  The Prussian army article provides two citations.  If Mirabeau said this there should at least be a citation to the fact, because it is important to know who said it first, yada yada yada. LaurentianShield (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote attributed to Mirabeau
Talk:Nicolas Baudin

message: Whilst in Ireland 2006 for the 250th birthday anniversary of my 4xGreat Grandfather General Joseph Holt, Limerick University Irish History Prof Ruan O'Donnell said pers comm that Commander Nicholas Baudin had secret sealed orders from Napoleon to see my "Australian" apical ancestor sent to Sydney 1799. I've not yet been able to find any supporting information substantiating this since. Does anyone know where I may then look? Matthew 11:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oct 1800 Secret Sealed Orders from Napoleon to see 1798 United Irish General [[Joseph Holt (rebel)]]? 

message: Baudin's black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus baudinii) 175.45.116.65 (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy - Species honouring Baudin
Talk:French submarine Minerve (S647)

message: The French article says she sank on 27 January. Drutt (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: :The sentence in the "Discovery" section seems like it could be reworded. The sentence is rather long with only one break. The "discovery of the location" would also be the discovery of the wreck". 
:Suggestion: "The discovery of the wreck was announced on 22 July 2019, by the same company (Ocean Infinity) and ship (Seabed Constructor) that in 2018 discovered the Argentine submarine ARA San Juan, which sank in the South Atlantic in November 2017. Also, the lead section (a summary) does not need to be sourced with the same source found in the body. Otr500 (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested tweek 

message: The infobox has an unreferenced completion date of 31 May 1961, the same day as for her launching, which seems unlikely.  Completion date is not mentioned in the article.
Fr:WP is unhelpful: it has an unreferenced launch date of 19 June 1962 and no completion date - one ref used there for other things confirms launch 31/5/1961, but again nothing on completion. Davidships (talk) 19:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur, the completion date first appears in this diff, without a source. It may be an typographical error, or a confusion of "launch" as a synonym for "completion" - which of course is not the case. I've removed it for now, though of course pending the appearence of sources for a "completion" date. Spokoyni (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Belated thanks.  Davidships (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completion 

message: BBC, France24, France 24, Daily Star, Daily Sabah, DW, Guardian, Reuters CNN, The New York Times, Popular Mechanics, Mashable, USA Today, The Times, Sputnik, RT, Buenos Aires Times, Telegraph, Economic Times, ABC (Australia), South China Morning Post Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sinking sources  

message: I've removed the piped link to Artificial reef on "maritime sanctuary" under WP:BRD as, though added in good faith, I think it is misleading. The French term "sanctuaire maritime" is further explained as " une sépulture sous-marine", suggesting a marine grave and protected space along the lines of the USS Arizona Memorial or sites of the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973, rather than a deliberate sanctuary for marine life as an artificial reef is. I'm open to discussion however if people disagree. Spokoyni (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "maritime sanctuary"
Talk:Air-sol moyenne portée

message: A previous version of this article stated that, because the declared yield of the warhead was 300 kt, its killing power was 20 times that of the bomb used on Hiroshima, hence it was capable of killing 5 million persons (250,000 x 20) and annihilating a city like Paris. This is incorrect. Explosions, like all emissions of energy from a single point, are subject to the inverse-square rule (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law). To quote the article on the rule: "a specified physical quantity or intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity". Hence the damage caused by an explosion, and the area affected, does not increase in proportion with the weapon's yield.
A good illustration of the damage caused by a 300 kt device, detonated at optimal airburst height, can be found at http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?&kt=300&lat=48.8583&lng=2.2945&hob_ft=0&casualties=1&zm=11. Although this calculator cannot assumed to be entirely accurate, the blast effects of nuclear weapons are well known and well recorded from years of U.S. civil defense material.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.98.189 (talk) 20:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed reference to the killing power of the warhead, which was patently incorrect to anyone with a rudimentary grasp of weapons physics.
Talk:Claude-Henri Belgrand de Vaubois

message: Why is he on the Arch? --AW 19:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: anyone? --AW 19:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arch de Triomphe? 

message: Is it confirmed that the treasures stolen from Malta are still in Aboukir Bay from the day when they went down with the Orient? Can someone explain it? Malteseman1983 20:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orient treasures 
Talk:Nine Provinces

message: This map is pretty but shouldn't be used. It's highly misleading as to even the notional idea of where these provinces were considered to be. Liang, e.g., included the upper Wei and W Han rivers. The map seems to have been arbitrarily composed, whereas there are sources (however inconsistent among themselves) for what the provinces were considered to include. — LlywelynII 13:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The nine zhou.svg
Talk:Closing (real estate)

message: The revision which I have made are based on the following:
I spent about 20 years in real estate, was licenced in two Eastern states, and have bought property in a third (in the West).  I was assistant manager, manager, and then co-owner of a brokerage, as well as listing and selling $6 to $14 million in real estate annually. I held CRS, GRI, ePro, and ABR designations. --Vivaverdi 22:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I could use information on settlement companies. --Amit 02:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions to this article 

message: The article said in most jurisdictions, ownership officially transfers when someone records the deed.  I believe this is not true and that in most jurisdictions, ownership transfers when a deed from the seller is delivered to the buyer.  Recording the deed is optional and only serves to protect the buyer against another buyer who should buy the same property from the seller without knowing it had already been sold.  I changed the article.  Bryan Henderson (talk) 02:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership transfers on deliver of the deed, not recording 

message: Please verify the documents!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.210.106 (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ealty purchase. 

message: In my experience, closings are invariably held first thing in the morning.  Is this by custom, or could it be that property is officially transferred, not at the moment the papers are signed, but as of noon on the day?  Is this an example of the official start to the day being noon, not midnight?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.15.119.52 (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing of closing ceremonies
Talk:Charles de la Bédoyère

message: *Yes, of course! Johnbod (talk) 10:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Charles-Angélique-François Huchet de la Bedoyère - a translation from wp:fr now redirects here. No text seemed to need merging. Johnbod (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:SN Brussels Airlines

message: What does the SN in the name stand for... Sabena National? -newkai | talk | contribs 22:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It is mentioned that SN Brussels Airlines is a candidate to join the oneworld alliance.  Where does this info come from?  It has been rumoured, (and on a personal note: it would make sense if they were to join) but as far as I'm aware, nothing official is known.--B-west 22:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SN candidate in joining oneworld? 

message: Why is this article in past tense? SNBA is still flying under the SN label... - unsigned contribution apparently from 81.245.246.136 at 17:49, 28 February 2007, promoted to section by Certes (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense of article
Talk:Maurice Janin

message: typical useless wiki entry - empty data  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.34.142 (talk) 09:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AND
Talk:Trainwreck (album)

message: Yeah i think we should post something, i'll get on that tonite but it might be biased 'cause nothing is positive about exactly what happens... 
I can try though. (24.247.108.204 03:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story 
Talk:Body louse

message: How can you tell the difference between a BODY and a HEAD louse?  THey look the same to me!
The current article says:
:Pediculus humanus humanus (the body louse) is indistinguishable in appearance from Pediculus humanus capitus (the head louse) and under laboratory conditions they will interbreed. In their natural state, however, the two subspecies do not interbreed and occupy different habitats. In particular, body lice have evolved to attach their eggs to clothes, whereas head lice attach their eggs to the base of hairs.
But then they are distinguishable - just test if they prefer to lay their eggs in hair or clothes... Thue | talk 01:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Indistinguishable?

message: Can someone add a section on the life cycle of the louse?  Thx.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.28.198 (talk) 02:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life Cycle 

message: Can head and body lice cross over into each other's territory to get to where they are suppose to go?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.28.211.200 (talk) 23:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louse territory 

message: Pubic lice (Pthirus) is a different species.--Miguelferig (talk) 20:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pubic lice

message: This image https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Body_Louse_(Pediculus_humanus_humanus).jpg is a pubic louse, not a body louse. See here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Body_Louse_(Pediculus_humanus_humanus).jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.53.64.82 (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong image
Talk:Art Óg Mac Murchadha Caomhánach

message: In my IE browser, the Irish flag covers the left hand corner of the table.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it down the page, but it probably needs some markup.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 posts

message: Can anybody tell me why "Art Mór" should be anglicised as "Art Mac Art"? Sounds as though there's a missing link somewhere.  Scolaire (talk) 12:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglicised?
Talk:Uglydoll

message: Removed the section about the "rumored Ugly Dolls movie" due to the crystal ball aspect of it. Ameltzer 22:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up language and removing advertising

message: Cosidering the fact that TooDee was discontinued, i think we should add that in somewhere. I'm just not sure where.
Randompeoplesunited (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TooDee discontinued...
Talk:Tuna (Polynesian mythology)

message: This article has no provenance and the culture of origin is not identified. Has no value (or credibility) without these. It also erroneously combines stories from different countries, as shown by the use of the names Sina (possibly Samoan) and Hina (possibly Māori or Hawaiian) Kahuroa 22:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Provenance?
Talk:Walk Away (Franz Ferdinand song)

message: What is this song about? I'm not sure I'm interpreting it right. Some guy 22:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

message: There could be something on the music video; not sure how to briefly summarize it... AnonMoos (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: music video