Talk:Cumulus Media

message: :Image:Cumulusmedia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cumulusmedia.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cumulus Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715151444/http://www.radio-info.com/news/citadel-says-no-to-two-merger-offers-from-cumulus to http://www.radio-info.com/news/citadel-says-no-to-two-merger-offers-from-cumulus
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110426074849/http://www.radio-info.com:80/news/citadel-confirms-exclusive-negotiations-with-cumulus-but-says-no-deal-yet to http://www.radio-info.com/news/citadel-confirms-exclusive-negotiations-with-cumulus-but-says-no-deal-yet
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215065320/http://www.dowjones.com/ to http://www.dowjones.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Cumulus Media. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513054228/http://www.rbr.com/media-news/wall-street/13895.html to http://www.rbr.com/media-news/wall-street/13895.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120624071339/http://www.radio-info.com/news/cumulus-ceo-half-the-companies-in-radio-gone-in-36-months to http://www.radio-info.com/news/cumulus-ceo-half-the-companies-in-radio-gone-in-36-months
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.radio-info.com/news/citadel-confirms-exclusive-negotiations-with-cumulus-but-says-no-deal-yet
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110416151842/http://www.radio-info.com/news/cumulus-files-to-divest-14-stations-to-complete-its-24b-purchase-of-citadel to http://www.radio-info.com/news/cumulus-files-to-divest-14-stations-to-complete-its-24b-purchase-of-citadel
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120506051720/http://www.radio-info.com/news/townsquare-and-cumulus-swap-65-stations-in-13-markets to http://www.radio-info.com/news/townsquare-and-cumulus-swap-65-stations-in-13-markets
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120103161747/http://www.radio-info.com/ to http://www.radio-info.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081231121914/http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntry.asp?hid=144472&pt=todaysnews to http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntry.asp?hid=144472&pt=todaysnews
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is there a precedent on Wikipedia for company news headlines appearing under a centralized heading? This article is a jumbled mess that mixes company information with news headlines. News headlines need to be a separate item. Please see SONY for an example of how to organize information. Gorba (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In The News? 

message: An IP editor has been repeatedly adding claims that the memo discussed in the Response to 2020 election fraud claims did not exist, or at least that Mark Levin says that it doesn't exist. There are sources in the article specifically covering the existence of the memo (The New York Times even has extensive quotes), so claims that it did not should not appear here. I have seen some claims in low quality sources suggesting that Mark Levin does deny the existence of the memo, but any claims about Levin require a high-quality source as well. No such source has been provided yet, so that material does not belong in the article. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputes about the 2020 election memo require a source 

message: I'm wondering if maybe the 2020 election section should be slightly altered, to "Responses to controversies" or "Responsible actions" or something like that, so things like Cumulus' recent actions towards Morgan Wallen can be included.  These days, it seems significant when a major media company like Cumulus takes a stand with respect to misinformation, racism, etc. -- gathering them all into a single section seems logical but I can't come up with a good title.  Thoughts?  Bookgrrl holler/lookee here 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't heard about the relevant incident until I read this comment, and to me it doesn't look like a case of Cumulus Media responding to a controversy, it looks like everybody in music media had the same response to the controversy. I think it's probably undue weight to mention it here, as opposed to Wallen's article that mentions all of the responses. It's certainly true that Cumulus did respond, I just don't see it being a big part of what they're known for. That's in my own opinion, of course. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 08:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morgan Wallen response