Talk:WVAH-TV

message: I removed this unsourced speculation (which effectively "poisons the well"). This should not be returned to the article until/unless the article has been rewritten in NPOV style so that it would be put in proper context and the assertion can be sourced per WP:V and WP:RS. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is overwhelming evidence that Glencairn/Cunningham is simply a shell corporation used by Sinclair to evade FCC ownership rules. 

message: This article contains allegations of violations of the law (via violations of FCC rules) without providing any sources. I have tagged two of the most egregious examples of this. If these cannot be sourced immediately, they need to be removed. I do not have sources to offer, so I am hoping others do. I will be watching this carefully, however, and if these are not sourced quickly, I will be removing them. Ithizar (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It has now been one week without any sources provided or any response to my concerns. I have therefore removed the unsourced accusatory statements from the article. They can easily be re-inserted should someone be able to provide a reliable secondary source. Also, I have tagged a couple of other statements that are not quite as direct, but still imply illegal behavior, as needing sources. One of them had originally been "sourced" by linking to an anti-Sinclair web site, which would not be a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. In any case, though, the link now directs to a generic political news web site and is not a valid source at all. Should these statements not get sources soon, I will remove them as well. Ithizar (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It has now been one month since I posted my original concerns, and no one has provided sources for the remaining accusatory statements. I have therefore removed them from the article. Anything I have removed can be easily re-inserted should sources be available. Ithizar (talk) 18:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations of Legal Violations 

message: Can you please remove the show from the article, cause it's no longer aired on local stations. Thank you.
37.235.52.16 (talk) 03:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been tagged as out-of-date for three months now, and nobody has come to fix it. Rather than expect to keep it up to the minute when nobody is maintaining it, I've changed "includes" into "includes or has included". --Stfg (talk) 14:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grace Under Fire 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on WVAH-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070914125657/http://multichannel.com:80/article/CA6349903.html to http://multichannel.com/article/CA6349903.html
*Added  tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified