Talk:Tarantul-class corvette

message: * Request that 194.85.148.66 be mindful in making "all Russkies are Commies" comments that such ill-informed negative assertions are unappreciated.  In point of fact, during the Soviet era members of the Communist Party comprised less than 4% of the population and far from all of them were Russians.  In the current situation the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CFRF) is a relatively small organization with little to no functional influence on Russian policies of any kind.Moryak (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He was trolling. 96.55.192.119 (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference comments

message: The operators list has the US Navy using this class of ship.  Did the US receive a ship for evaluation or lease?  Or is this false?  I'm going to put a "citation needed" tag on it until someone can confirm or deny.  I'm leaning towards just deleting the US from the list, though.  I doubt the US has a Soviet/Russian ship in their position, though such occurrences are not unheard of.  Ripberger (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: US Navy

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tarantul-class corvette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124115305/http://hnsa.org/ships/hiddensee.htm to http://www.hnsa.org/ships/hiddensee.htm
*Added  tag to http://balabin-1712.livejournal.com/3395.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118105013/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Veer.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Veer.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: "The need for these improvements was underscored by the First Gulf War, when 12 Iraqi Osa-I-class missile boats were destroyed or damaged by short ranged Sea Skua anti-ship missiles. They were attacked by British Lynx helicopters, but the Osa crews did not notice them because they flew below their radar horizon."
The Sea Skua uses a guidance principle that makes this impossible. The helicopter needed to have a radio sline of sight to the ship to engage it with the Sea Skua missile.
I propose we delete that part, it has no source anyway. 193.25.47.211 (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Sounds reasonable. Llammakey (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  questionable claim 

message: This page was vandalised today, we might want to consider protecting it. Aitorbk (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism