lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kappei Yamaguchi

message: In case anyone is wondering,the ANN link is temporarily out of order due to Anime News Network suffering a hard drive crash.It should be back up within a week or two,though. Ranma9617 03:16, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goku

message: Goku was also the 9th Hokage you need to mention that it comes in episode 77 db super GokuSolos9992 (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2023 

message: it's been a long time since Granolah saga ended and it has not been put on this article and that causes many information like Goku developing an unique Ultra Instinct, him remembering his father and him understanding his Saiyan pride being missing. GeneralTablos (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  add Granolah the survivor  arc  

message: https://dragonball.fandom.com/wiki/Kamehameha#Development states that Toriyama asked his wife Nachi Mikami for a name for the Kame attack and she came up with the name of the Hawaiian king. The source referenced is the Dragon Ball: Super Exciting Guide. 2003:CA:E719:FD2A:85B5:E754:33CF:5536 (talk) 09:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toriyama's wife's role for Kamehameha 

message: i think i can add more as there is been only the talk about dbs but i can add manga and non canon episodes as well like dragon ball gt my sources will be various anime fandoms and anime sites like cruncyroll  as well as 3rd party sources Danyalwe (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2023 

message: David Gasman voiced Goku for the French-produced dubs by AB Groupe that were made for a few DBZ movies while Nesty Calvo Ramirez voiced him for a "Speedy" Filipino Dub for movie 5. 
Source: Citation 36 (Voice Compare: Dragon - Goku - Behind The Voice Actors) Hil-LOL-ious (talk) 13:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing VAs
Talk:Magnetic Hill (Moncton)

message: The article is written as Moncton has the only magnetic hill. I pressume the author didn't realize there are two in Canada. The other is located in Burlington, Ontario. If no one fixes this article, I'll do it when I've got some time :) Mrtea 00:33, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I skimmed over that too fast, sorry! I didn't realize Magnetic Hill was actually the name of the landmark and gravity hill is its "scientific" name. Burlington also uses the title Magnetic Hill and not gravity hill. --Mrtea 00:37, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the only magnetic hill! 

message: Photographs at Magnetic Hill in Ladakh Region in India are added to the article.
Gktambe 20:40, December 29th, 2006.
:Hello,
:Please understand that this article is about the Magnetic Hill in Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada. Thus, pictures of a different "magnetic hill" in India are irrelevant, and should not be added to this article. However, feel free to add them to other appropriate articles (as you have on the article for Gravity hill) to illustrate the subject in question. If you feel that there may be a legitimate reason to include these pictures in this article (Magnetic Hill), please discuss it here, rather than re-adding the pictures. See the welcome page for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Keith Davies Lehwald 20:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 

message: The caption on the first photo flatly declares that the white post appears to be at the lowest point in the road. Well, it doesn't. The perspective/topographical curve of the grass at the berm makes it clear that post is on an upward slope. What actually appears to be the lowest point is 20 to 30 feet closer to the camera. I think this caption is attempting to force the photo to depict something it does not. Jtcarpet (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos do not illustrate illusion
Talk:Renormalizable

message: "... general relativity are non-renormalizable. This problem is a hint that these theories should be replaced by a more complete theory at very short distance. These more complete theories are ... string theory..."
It's presumptuous to assume string theory is the underlying theory of quantum gravity. Phys 04:19, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it is. I've changed it. Greets, David  13:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Churrascaria

message: It shall be Churrasquería!!!!
::Why? Just because in Portugual is known as Churrasquería? Churrasco is typical from Brazil, so it MUST be Churrascaria.
201.14.46.160 20:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Churrascaria?

message: The person who proposed the merge did not describe their reasons.  It looks like the :Rodizio description of what a churrascaria is like should be merged into the Churrascaria article.  The Churrascaria article should mention that it is a type of rodizio.  (SEWilco 03:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah.  That explanation should be included in the articles and the Merge label removed.  (SEWilco 04:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Rodizio
Talk:Kottabos

message: What is the player in the vase picture holding in his left hand? I see that in a lot of similar pictures. It is as if the player refills the kylix from it. Is it a skyphos? Any info on this? Haiduc 01:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic question 

message: I'm curious about using the Latin word "anglice" to describe the English version of a Greek word. Is this standard?
24.19.32.14 (talk) 04:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno, but I've linked it to help. -Oreo Priest talk 16:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglice 

message: Currently the lead links to Antiphanes, which is a disambiguation page.  It seems most likely that the intention was to link to Antiphanes of Berge (based on that article's note that he wrote a work on courtesans.  However, Antiphanes (comic poet) may have been intended instead.  (Though looking at the history, the link to Antiphanes was in the article before the article at Antiphanes became a dab page; previously it was the page for the comic poet, so perhaps that was what was intended.) Can anyone shed any light?  Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation of Antiphanes
Talk:Eric's Trip

message: I presume these guys are named after the Sonic Youth song of the same name (on Daydream Nation). Is that right, and is it worth mentioning? Leithp (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was obviously being particularly stupid on that day, as it's already mentioned. Leithp (talk) 12:32, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic Youth 

message: I added this particular Rick White to the Rick White disambig page. -Colin Kimbrell 01:47, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rick White Disambig
Talk:Malay Archipelago

message: I propose to merge Insulindia into Malay Archipelago. It seems they duplicate each other. (Generated using markasduplicate.js.) --Luan (discussão) 15:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The infobox currently displays a second map that only shows Belitung island. This looks silly and is also geographically wrong: the actual center is probably located somewhere around the Makassar Strait. Can we shift the coordinates and also do something about the scale of the map? If we shift the center to somewhere in the sea, this scale will only show us a piece of blue. Austronesier (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we? The second map is being inherently generated by the presence of Template:Infobox islands, we don't have any code in this article's infobox defining it. CMD (talk) 11:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The coordinates are in the article in the -template. I'll remove it and see what happens. –Austronesier (talk) 16:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Still there, looks like the template grabs the coordinates from Wikidata. Wonder if there is a way to suppress it. –Austronesier (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure why this article has coordinates anyway, but posted at Template talk:Infobox islands. CMD (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has now changed Wikidata:Q208643 and it shows a wider scope for me now. CMD (talk) 13:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I could be nitpicking and say that the dot offshore of Mangole island is too far in the east. But the most important thing is that the scale now provides a complete view of the archipelago. –Austronesier (talk) 18:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map / coordinates 

message: The list of countries in the archipelago in the second paragraph of the article doesn't mention Singapore, and Singapore doesn't appear to be highlighted on the map in the infobox (but it's hard to tell). But Singapore appears on the list of the most populated islands in the archipelago. Is Singapore part of the archipelago or isn't it? I have no opinion on this matter, but the article should be consistent. AJD (talk) 22:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Geography is fuzzy, my note here is the current lead cite to Britannica does not include Singapore. CMD (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, should we remove it from the list of most populous islands? AJD (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, with the note that this does not solve the general lack of sources in that section. CMD (talk) 15:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singapore inconsistency
Category talk:Documentary films

message: The name of this category is being disputed. See Category_talk:Television documentaries. -Eep² 07:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name dispute 

message: There are many, many films on this list that haven't been added to the relevant subcategory (e.g., :Category:American documentary films). It would be good if we could all work on that as we go through the different articles editing other aspects. Lawikitejana 09:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategories 

message: And for docs made SOLELY for direct sale to the public? Not via TV? Can there be a DVD documentary category please? Manxwoman (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that it already exists as a category: "Direct-to-video documentary films"!! Manxwoman (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD documentary 

message: As of right now there's just :Category:Documentary films by decade - please subdivide it by years.
I created :Category:2016 documentary films as a start. Most (not all) entries of it can be found via this category intersection: petscan intersection example.
--Fixuture (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please create [[:Category:Documentary films by year]]
Draft talk:OpenTalk

message: For an April 2005 deletion over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/OpenTalk
----
Has this been at all confirmed? I think that we should wait until there is a press release of the fact at Apple PR, or they actually start to use the name to mean Rendezvous. If indeed it is a real change, then Rendezvous should be moved and redirected here. — David Remahl 10:49, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: As I understand, the article was moved to DRAFT for insufficient non primary sources (As per the comment in the history). I tried to add some sources of larger media outlets, but articles about this software seem to be mainly concentrated in the German language are. Spiegel is a large German magazine (print and online), heise is a tech centred media company and online magazine, t3n is a magazine centred on technology and business. Therefore I hope this addition can lead to the sourcing of this article being acceptable. However I was never really active on the english Wikipedia, so I don´t know if thats enough. Pandora85 (talk) Pandora85 (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenTalk Software: Developing the Draft
Talk:Wave theory of light

message: relation beyween path difference and phase difference
-----
"The wave theory of light is the set of light as an electromagnetic wave. In this theory, light is represented as a spectrum of frequencies, some of which we can see (visible light) and some of which we can't (ultraviolet and infrared light).
Also see: Electromagnetic radiation"
I'm going to redirect this stub over to a much more extensive discussion at "Wave-particle duality". That's where "Particle theory of light" already goes.
Atlant 00:53, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Is it really worth resurrecting this article, given that there is considerably longer explanation of the same concept at Light#Wave theory (which has the advantage of situating the wave theory in its historical context)?  Djr32 (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Who's going to write it if there's not already a stub there?  Articles grow by starting off small and being expanded. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 23:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Lake Sebu, South Cotabato

message: This article has been written based on various newspapers, books, and online articles. There is no copyright violation done. If you have doubts, contact me first before you make any actions Latorilla 12:02, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: I would like to suggest that we split these article into two: Lake Sebu, South Cotabato (municipality) and Lake Sebu (body of water - lake). I noticed that when we want an article about the lake, it is redirected to the article about the municipality. I don't know how to do these, I think we need some administrators to handle this thing.Kleomarlo (talk) 12:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the article into two topics 

message: When I viewed the page for Lake Sebu, I noticed that a barangay "Sarmiento Benjamin" is listed as the first barangay. Lake Sebu only has 19 barangays and there is no Barangay Sarmiento Benjamin in the municipality. I also checked our database (containing data from NSCB on the official list of barangays) and there is also no such barangay. In case our database isn't updated I also accessed the NSCB website. The NSCB list of barangays also do not have the aforementioned as a barangay. 
http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/municipality.asp?muncode=126319000®code=12&provcode=63
I'm a noob and is apprehensive about editing the main page, could someone correct the data? Thank you very much.
Tinjune (talk) 02:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query on Barangays of Lake Sebu 

message: mag bigay ng pagsasalaysay sa lake sebu 2001:4455:1AE:7300:E045:33DB:FA76:4CD8 (talk) 10:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  filipino
Talk:Peking University

message: The redirect Beida has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Beida]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Addition-chain exponentiation

message: Someone should add an example.
-- 151.198.133.102
There may be an example (if it's the same thing) at Talk:Exponentiation by squaring.
-- Toby Bartels 19:59, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Example

message: The paper "Computing sequences with addition chains" by P. Downey, B. Leong and R. Sethi, SIAM JOC, v.10, n.3, 1981 proves that finding a shortest addition sequence (i.e. an addition chain containing a given set of integers) is NP-hard. The paper clearly states that it is an open problem whether finding a shortest addition chain for an integer is NP-complete. Despite this clear statement the paper is often misrepresented. Is there a new result showing the NP-completeness of finding addition chains or is this article misquoting the paper above too? 85.2.29.86 21:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it is indeed a misquote.  The Gordon et al. survey states that "Downey et al. [10] showed that the problem of finding the shortest addition sequence is NP-complete," which I misread as "addition chain".  I'll hunt around for more references and then fix the article(s).  —Steven G. Johnson 22:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I fixed it after nearly 2 years and made a concise wording shortest / minimal / optimal, hopefully. Regards, Achim1999 (talk) 15:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NP-hardness of addition chains 

message: Is there anything in this article that could not be covered at Addition chain?  Deltahedron (talk) 20:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:List of North Carolina state parks

message: Is this list complete? If so We should add a line to the list to indicate it. As it is (without empty articles) I have the suspicion that it is incomplete. Rmhermen 15:15, Jul 25, 2004 (UTC)
:The list of current state parks was not complete, but now it is.  I added a reference to every unit of the state park system, as of January 2011, according to NCDPR documents.  Given how different each of the six types of park units are from each other, I thought the most logical layout was to put each type in its own section, with an explanation of what that type is.  I also put the lists in a sortable table, with relevant facts for each unit.  This is similar to what has been done on other state park lists.  I have more detailed comments about the Former Units and State Natural Areas sections below.  (The revision)  Sparkgap (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did not wiki-link most of the State Natural Areas because many did not have their own article nor an appropriate related article to link to.  I'm unsure if a stub should be created for all the natural areas without an article at this time.  For several of them, there's not much source material one can find on them, and I question whether these are notable enough for their own article.  A few could become sections in the article of a nearby state park.  For example Lower Haw River State Natural Area is closely, even physically, tied to Jordan Lake State Recreation Area, and a short write-up about it could fit in well there.  A couple I think merit their own articles (I'll be working on one for Theodore Roosevelt State Natural Area soon), but I'm not sure what to do about the rest.  Thoughts??
Sparkgap (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's best to handle them on a case by case basis. Indeed some of them are mearly special parts of a park and my not bear special notice. Stubs are good. Somebody might be inspired and write an article. For example, Upper Pine Bottom State Park in Pennsylvania is little more than a roadside picnic area. This doesn't mean that there is little to write about it. Dincher (talk) 13:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I think case by case by be best, and I wasn't sure if creating several stubs would be good.  North Carolina, unlike some states, does not carve State Natural Areas out of other parks.  Rather, each is really its own park, and only a couple are adjacent to another park.  Those that happen to be adjacent to another park, were created independently from the other park.   Most of them are completely undeveloped though, and the few that are developed are usually managed by the nearest state park.  On another note, Upper Pine Bottom State Park is an interesting example of a small park.  I've never heard of a state park that is so small, but it does have an notable history, something I doubt some of the NC State Natural Areas have. Sparkgap (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: State Natural Areas
Talk:AFC Central

message: From VfD:
An article about one division in the NFL information can be founed on the main NFL page, Smith03 14:23, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While this division doesn't exist anymore it does have a history as shown on AFC Central 1970-2001 which seems encyclopedic. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a legitimate merge proposal. I understand this page is currently a redirect but I am suggesting it should be an article instead. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   Merge means to combine two things into one.  We can't combine a redirect and an article into a single entity.  Changing a redirect into an article does not constitute merging.  Are you wanting to move AFC Central 1970-2001 to this title, or to write a whole new article about AFC Central? — Smjg (talk) 23:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  The content from AFC Central 1970-2001 should be moved here. Given that this is an article, albeit a redirect, I thought doing so with discussion before doing the move (and histmerg) was proper. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:40, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[AFC Central 1970-2001]]
Talk:Potential output

message: This article should be renamed Potential GDP, rather than just redirected from "Potential GDP".  
The "Real GDP" article should linked here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.142.40 (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be renamed Potential GDP.
Talk:Johnson City, Texas

message: Can it be true that the town was named after Lyndon Baines Johnson's grandfather ?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpjas (talk • contribs) 17:52, 25 July 2004
:I thought the town was named after (or at least renamed in honor of) LBJ himself. millerc 05:32, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No I was wrong, according to the town's official website it was named after James Polk Johnson a nephew of LBJ's grandfather, although the Johnson ranch which preceeded the founding of the town was named for LBJ's grandfather. millerc 05:41, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of populated places in South Africa

message: This list is woefully short... I can't even find Joey's! MDCore 18:01, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Surely there must be a way to get all towns in the various provinces to be added automatically to this list. Maybe sorted into a box, with province name. Also considering that some towns in RSA have counterparts in other parts of the world. Flagman (talk) 13:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Automatic

message: I have just gone through the list of South African settlements and have found the following errors:
BARODA, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA (REMOVE)
LINKS TO VADODARA, INDIA 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadodara
There is a Baroda Bank in South Africa but no settlement.
BAYALA, KWA-ZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA (REMOVE)
LINKS TO BAYALA, NEPAL 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayala
There is no such settlement in South Africa.
BENDIGO, KWA-ZULU NATAL, SOUTH AFRICA (REMOVE)
LINKS TO BENDIGO, AUSTRALIA 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bendigo
There was a Bendigo Gold Mine at Knysna, South Africa but there is no settlement.
HEIDELBERG, WESTERN CAPE, SOUTH ARICA
LINKS TO HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg
SHOULD BE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg,_Western_Cape
HEIDELBERG, GAUTENG, SOUTH ARICA
LINKS TO HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg
SHOULD BE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg,_Gauteng
MUDEN, MPUMALANGA (DOESN'T EXIST)
LINKS TO MUDEN, GERMANY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCden_(Aller)
SHOULD BE:
MUDEN, KWAZULU NATAL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muden,_KwaZulu-Natal
UNDERBERG, KWAZULU-NATAL
LINKS TO UNDERBERG, GERMANY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underberg
SHOULD BE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underberg,_KwaZulu-Natal
WELLINGTON, WESTERN CAPE
LINKS TO WELLINGTON NEW ZEALAND
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellington
SHOULD BE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellington,_Western_Cape
Signaller (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect city links