lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coughton, Warwickshire

message: Page moved from  Coughton, Alcester → Coughton, Warwickshire. Dab updated. Old Rd AfD'd.--Kudpung (talk) 10:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If you  are not  sure how to  do  this,  there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:</p> The text written in the field will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching this article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summaries
Talk:Council of Wales and the Marches

message: I've removed this map: , because it shows a modern interpretation of the loose term "The Marches" and not the area administered by the Council, which covered the whole of modern Wales, plus the counties of Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire (but not Cheshire). Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my bad. ;) Owain (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, sorry - Cheshire was apparently in for a time, see text.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of the Welsh Marches
Talk:Cound

message: I am puzzled by the recently amended caption for the Riverside Inn photograph. To my mind (after closely studying the Google Earth aerial photograph) the picture actually shows the original front of the Inn, now deemed to be the back of the building and the pathway in the picture's foreground is laid on the original route of the Severn Valley railway line. 
However, the editor that amended the caption seems to be implying that the picture shows the current front of the building and the "roadway" seen is the current main road. Could someone who lives in Cound, or knows the building well, please clear up the situation? 21$₮ ₡€₦₮UR¥ GR€€₦$₮U₣₣(talk) 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Riverside Inn caption

message: The sections on geology and sandstone quarrying could be edited as it verges on digression from the Cound parish territory. The Sharpstones Hill quarry and the sandpit where the Condover Mammoth was found are within the parishes of Condover and Bayston Hill which do not border Cound (the parishes of Berrington and Pitchford buffer Cound from the two). I have noticed there is identical text in the Bayston Hill wiki article which suggests it may have been copied from that page to this without much tailoring to the Cound context. I do not live in Cound but from memory of travelling through its parish I question if Lyth Hill and Sharpstones can even be seen from its territory?Cloptonson (talk) 08:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted from the quarrying subsection the material relating to Condover as I have just found it is identically given in Condover's own article!Cloptonson (talk) 19:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested editing
Talk:County Sessions House, Liverpool

message: I added some detail on the location to this page, which was 
deleted with the edit summary "unsourced changes: please read WP:CITE and WP:RS on how to source your edits. thanks". So, what seems to be the problem here? I am well aware of WP:RS and WP:CITE; On the other hand, WP:NOTCITE and WP:OBV point out that if something is obvious then shouldn’t require sourcing; and a quick look at the map (here) bears out what has been posted. I also thought it was customary to post a cite request in situations like this, rather than simply deleting stuff out of hand. Swanny18 (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim that William Brown Street is "the only street in the United Kingdom to consist of nothing other than museums, galleries and libraries" is a quite a claim. If it is so obvious please add a citation - I have looked for one and cannot immediately see one. If I have missed an obvious source, then I apologise. Dormskirk (talk) 22:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough: I have to confess I adapted the paragraph from the Walker Art Gallery page without checking it (though it sounded plausible enough); I have already addressed the problem there. Do I take it though that you have no issue with the other material that was deleted? Swanny18 (talk) 21:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - It would be more normal to see any details of location in the lead, and the history and architecture sections fully referenced. So, if you were add a bit to to the lead (e.g. the name of the street and adjacent buildings) that would be fine with me. Dormskirk (talk) 21:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Coventry Transport Museum

message: As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes.  To make things easier to sort out there is a special :Category:British motorcycles  Please add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create.  It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing.  I've linked the Category to the Commons Motorcycles of Britain so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons.  Thanks  Tony (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles should be categorized as per Wikipedia:Categorization. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Category for British Motorcycles
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Oxymoron83

message: Oxymoron83's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 14:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See Oxymoron83's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 13:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. =] — xDanielx T/C\R 04:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request
Talk:Penny Lancaster

message: Not notable.  This person is married to a notable (famous) person. But being married to a notable person does not, in itself, make you notable.
I would suggest deleting this article.61.69.24.118 (talk) 13:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is this person in wiki? 

message: I checked the WikipArticle on The Order Of The British Empire and it says that the wife of a KNIGHT (which is a Knight Grand Cross or Knight Commander) is called "Lady Surname". But Rod Stewart is not a GBE or KBE but a CBE (I.e. not either sort of Knight, but a Commander). I checked to see if his wife might be "Lady Stewart" on account of his being a Knight Bachelor but I don't see that and I suspect a Knight Bachelor's wife is not "Lady Surname". Can someone sort this?2604:2000:C682:2D00:9DA7:6FC8:4E3D:C6DD (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Lady" Stewart?

message: FreeBMD shows only one P Lancaster birth in Essex, registered in March 1971, here, name Penelope Claire, mother's name McLaughlin, district Redbridge. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name
Talk:Puzzlewood

message: I could not verify these sections of the article. If it can be verified, please do add it back!
* The confusing layout of paths can mislead people into seeing six bridges rather than the two that actually exist.
*  using the method of shallow trenches to get at the iron ore
--Pearrari 14:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not verifiable

message: If anyone remember "The Old Forrest" where Frodo and the others meet Tom Bombadil this must surely be puzzlewood. Tolkien describes that they encounter deep trenches all over as if giant horsecarts had driven across the place (this is not an exact citation).--Honymand (talk) 08:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolkien 

message: Is it worth changing the existing paragraph here about what was filmed here into (perhaps) 2 bulleted lists: one of TV shows filmed, and one for Movies filmed?
I recently added mentions of another film (2020 - The Secret Garden) and 2 more TV shows, but I'm aware of at least a half dozen more that just be added and referenced. I also feel that the current formatting is a little mixed as well, as some properties are italicised and some are not, and some of the movies have quotation marks where others don't. TV episodes having quotation marks however, I can understand.
- Formalis (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - so long as you can find reliable sources (not existing Wikipedia pages) and include them.  Per MOS:ITALIC, movie titles should be in italics.  Go for it!   Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, thanks for the input (and Talk page notes). I'll gather the information, format it, then edit it into the article. Might not be for a day or two, so watch this space. Formalis (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Re:"Filming Location"
Talk:Crackenthorpe

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Cradley, Herefordshire

message: "...is regarded as a good neighbourhood." This urgently  needs a citation otherwise it might  be removed as POV. Kudpung (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good neighbourhood
Talk:Craven (Bradford ward)

message: Which country? Pedron (talk) 02:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is in West Yorkshire, England. I have added this to give context to article. Keith D (talk) 13:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Creech Grange

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
The Coordinates for Creech Grange are inaccurate, it is located at  50°38'25.67"N,   2° 7'20.80"W
81.133.178.194 (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Deor (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: There is no mention in the Historic England listing or any where else that I can see, of the property being damaged in the Civil War. Does anyone have a source for this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichWA (talk • contribs) 17:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This states that the estate was seized, presumably by Parliamentarians seeing as Lawrence's son was actively assisting the Royalists. However, it doesn't mention whether the house was damaged. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 22:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil War damage
Talk:Cressage

message: Would this article be of interest to Wikipedia: WikiProject Shropshire?Vorbee (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Best referred to the WikiProject talk page but I cannot guarantee a response as the project is flagged by wikipedia as 'Inactive'. (I am an extant member of this WikiProject.)Cloptonson (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Now tagged with Shropshire project tag. Crouch, Swale (talk)  19:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Shropshire
Talk:Creswell, Derbyshire

message: The text "During World War II children used to play in the caves at the Crags. In the woods behind the Crags there is a quarry. The woods were a great place for sweet chestnuts. Markland Grips was popular for fishing, hazelnuts and blackberries." sounds more like personal reminiscence than anything.  I suspect it should not be there, even though I believe it to be true.
--Slow Walker  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.144.69.178 (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic 
Talk:Creswell, Staffordshire

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:
* The decimal coordinates are incorrect - they are those of Creswell in Derbyshire.
Done. BrainMarble (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:Dr. Dre production discography

message: Look I know Dr. Dre hasn't done jack this year or last year, but adding songs that he hasn't even done yet?? This is just getting ridiculous, its bad enough some idiots keep putting a release date on Detox even though Dr. Dre has NEVER announced a release date and you dumb asses keep getting peoples hopes up by adding FAKE release dates, but now you idiots are adding "untitled" songs, songs he hasn't even done nor confirmed to this production discography? Come on people get real. Just because some idiot claims Dre is working on their album doesn't mean its true.
Siwhat (talk) 06:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Untitled Songs? 

message: Why is there nothing listed of what he produced prior to 1992?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlad the Impaler (talk • contribs) 08:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: pre-1992?

message: the song watch me with Jay-Z featuring Dr. Dre wasn't produced by Dr. Dre. it was done by someone called Lil' Rob and some other guy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siwhat (talk • contribs) 04:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watch Me

message: It was NOT produced by Dr. Dre. The song is produced by Boi-1da, which is shown in the album's liner notes. Blackjays1 (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Set It Off"

message: Dr. Dre didn't produce any tracks on that album, his name is not mentioned in the credits at all.
Respect my Congramerate is produced by Focus, Decision is produced by Mr. Porter
--Siwhat (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dre didn't produce on Back On My B.S 

message: its listed here that Dre produced a song called Dreaming on DJ Kay Slays album, however according to this tracklisting: http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/news/id.9681/title.kay-slay-readies-more-than-just-a-dj
there is no such track called Dreaming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_Than_Just_a_DJ#Track_listing
Siwhat (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dre on DJ Kay Slay?

message: Did Dre actually produce all of the 'livin' like hustlers' LP? I thought he just did a couple of tracks (last song & murder rap). The rest was produced by 187um killa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.179.63 (talk) 07:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to the liner notes credits, the entire album was "Produced by Dr. Dre, A.T.L. & Laylaw". --Blastmaster11 (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Above the law
Talk:Latin scansion

message: I changed this to redirect to the article Latin poetry, which already covers a certain amount of Latin scansion. That page, however, is misnamed, as it is not about poetry, but rather verse forms. That article is ongoing and I have suggested that its title be changed: "Scansion of Latin poetry," for example. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  changed to redirect
Talk:Wild Oranges

message: Because this film came out in 1924 (and 1924 copyrights expired January 1st of this year), this film is now in the public domain. Please find a copy of this film and link to it once it appears on the internet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.123.221 (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Deanlaw (talk) 15:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Domain Film
Talk:Cromwell Hospital

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was uncontroversial move. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

message: The article was deemed worthy for inclusion in Wikipedia: the result of the AfD was to keep it, because it's functional and appropriate as a Wikipedia article per Wikipedia notability guidelines, and its inclusion is congruent with building Wikipedia. Northamerica1000 (talk) 22:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article has been included in Wikipedia

message: I've removed a section saying that the hospital had not been awarded accreditation by any internationally recognized accreditation body: it seems at least to have passed a Care Quality Commission inspection in 2013 (see http://www.cqc.org.uk/node/293628), and the CQC is the UK government's own inspection body for healthcare providers. Are there other accreditation bodies that are relevant here? -- The Anome (talk) 10:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accreditation 
Talk:Crosby-on-Eden

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article as citations because the information has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take several years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Crosby Ravensworth

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article as citations because the information has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take several years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Crosby, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:08, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Cross Houses

message: With respect to the contributor - while the photograph of a winter morning (pre daylight) view of the centre of Cross Houses may be a pretty picture, I question its informational value in this page.  Because of the darkness no buildings show, so it does not do justice to the village! (I am not a resident.)  I would not be unhappy to see it deleted if more informative photos that show buildings and/or the landscape context were introduced.Cloptonson (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Used
Talk:Crosscanonby

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article as a citation because the information has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take several years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT External link 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Birkby, Cumbria. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 23#Birkby, Cumbria until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Devokewater @ 11:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Birkby, Cumbria" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Crosscanonby is not really a village, technically it's a very small hamlet consisting of a few houses (around 10). Crosby, Cumbria is the village, it could be argued that Crosscanonby is a suburb of Crosby. Even though the school + Council are named Crosscanonby, Crosby is the main place. --Devokewater @ 18:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Hamlet
Talk:Dominic Iorfa (footballer, born 1968)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 09:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dominic Iorfa →  – There is no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. Iorfa jr has played over 200 football league matches whilst Iorfa sr played less than 80. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 November 2022
Talk:Croxton, Cambridgeshire

message: How come the memorial for the Croxton men who died in the first and second world war was erected in 1920? The second world war started 20 years later...  14:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorial 

message: The article is nowhere near B-class, as it doesn't have anywhere near enough text. Hence, the downgrade to Start-class.EP111 (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Downgraded classification
Talk:History of agriculture in China

message: *Oppose, Philipbembridge proposes to merge the section of History in Agriculture in China into History of agriculture in the People's Republic of China. I disagree. As History of the People's Republic of China is a different article from History of China. It's good to also keep separate the Chinese agriculture history into several articles. --Neo-Jay 15:48, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: add: People's Republic is post-1949 since the founding of the People's Republic. If the reader doesn't understand then s/he can easily click on the China link and the People's Republic of China link to know the difference. Hadoooookin 16:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: add: if anything it would be the other way round, i.e. merge history of prc agriculture into agriculture in china, but its not practical as this article is humongous already. Hadoooookin 16:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: The 1950's section doesn't address the central role that poor government policies played in creating the Great Famine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.128.171.2 (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 1950's section and The Great Famine 

message: Should opium production be included?
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14672715.1976.10404414
"For over a century, millions of Chinese had been sacrificed to the opium poppy to satisfy the imperial ambitions of the Western powers, and then to support the rising power of provincial warlords who financed entire armies out of opium revenues. Peasants forced to grow the poppies, as well as the addicts, were the victims."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aufumy (talk • contribs) 02:12, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opium production 

message: "For 4,000 years China has been a nation of farmers." is incorrect. We know that agriculture had been going on in china for much longer than that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.16.87 (talk) 23:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad time figure
Talk:Ministry of Agriculture (China)

message: As of March 19, 2018 the MOA has been reformulated as the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The new wiki page for the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs acknowledges the MOA as its predecessor, but the MOA wiki page doesn't mention the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, which is understandable as the government website has yet to reflect this new structure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nederjoshua (talk • contribs) 03:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to past tense and link to the new Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs or merge the two pages