Talk:Magpie

message: I have learned about this bird.[:  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.158.147 (talk) 18:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: This page contains a distinct regional bias. The term Magpie will usually refer to an Australian Magpie, when in Australia. This page appears to refer exclusively to Magpies of the genus Pica, and even more particularly to the European Magpie.
I would like to propose that this entry is moved. Clearly, there are challenges in classifying the Holarctic Magpies, as there are separate entries for each Genus, but this entry is too narrow to encompass the term Magpie.
Alternatively, this page could encompass all Magpies, with references to the page for each Family and/or Genus. I personally think this would be a more user-friendly experience.
What do people think?
--Matthias.b.1971 (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Article scope now clarified to cover all magpies. See 'Clarifying scope of article' below. PeterEastern (talk) 09:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional Bias 

message: I'd like to know why the magpie has such a distinct poo colour/pattern. Every other bird I've seen is camouflaged in one way or another, but I can't find any image of a magpie in an environment that let it blend in.  Pipatron (talk) 10:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour/Pattern 

message: Shouldn't the magpie poem and it's speculation be entered?
The poem-
 Magpie Poem
 One for sorrow.
 Two for joy.
 Three for a letter.
 Four for a boy.
 Five for silver.
 Six for gold.
 Seven for a secret never to be told.
(The version I know is:
One for Sorrow
Two for Joy
Three for a Girl
Four for a Boy
Five for Silver
Six for Gold
Seven for a Secret, never to be told
Eight for a Wish
Nine for a Kiss
Ten's the bird you should not miss.
Apparently, if you see more than 10, the secondary number is
greatly more significant..so if you see 14 magpies, a BOY you
will shortly see has great significance to your life at the time!)  
-As folklore it should be added, the more common of these has been entered. This of course not the place for speculation, though.
Paul W  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.100.40 (talk) 19:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The magpie poem refers to European Magpie, certainly not all 13 species, similarly the group names. I thing it would need sourcing if it is suggested that all magpies or crows are known by the names made up usually for one European species in each case. These supposed group names are actually literary conceits with no real currency. Magpies and crow occur in flocks. Jimfbleak.talk.06:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest adding  a link to this One_for_Sorrow_(nursery_rhyme), also check out augury, if you're wondering why they have collective noun 'tiding'
What about the fact that the football club Newcastle United are called "The Magpies"? dllu (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magpies in Popular Culture? 

message: Maybe someone could add a reference to which the elevations at which magpies live? I know here in New Mexico, magpies only live in the mountainous areas above 7500 feet (or so).
:There are 13 species of magpie, so likely to vary. Yours is the Black-billed Magpie, I'll post a height range if I find one on that page. jimfbleak 05:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation at which magpies live 

message: This statement that "In general, the magpie is a symbol of happiness in Chinese culture" is linked to a page the broad overview of Chinese culture that makes no references to Magpies or symbols of happiness. Needs a better link. Dr algorythm 11:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magpies as symbols of luck in Chinese Culture 

message: The bird in the image above the taxobox is in fact a Currawong, not a Magpie.  124.176.8.153 (talk) 04:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Australian Magpie 

message: What is the explanation for the length of the magpie's tail. It must be an adaptation to something, but to what? Since both sexes have the same tail length it cannot be sexual selection. 217.42.89.22 (talk) 14:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tail length

message: Recent experiments involving mirrors have demonstrated that certain magpies can indeed 
recognise their own reflection.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.19.137.77 (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is already included in the article - footnote#2 Bob98133 (talk) 13:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Self Awareness

message: Does anyone know how to tell male and female apart? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.12.190 (talk) 17:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does anyone know how to tell male and female apart?

message: So, I have always been under the impression that the Magpie is a noisy bird but I am not finding that in my research. Does anyone know if this is true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.96.184 (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magpie - question 

message: I know there is a bird called 'cotofana' in Romania, also renowed as a smart bird and very similar looking as the magpie, and I don't believe there is nothing in between Romania and the Iberic peninsula.
199.214.166.48 (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magpies just in Iberia? 

message: Should interwiki links to articles on pica pica be removed? k kisses 18:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Those should be linked to Eurasian Magpie instead. MeegsC | Talk 18:43, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlingual discrepancies 

message: I have now adjusted the article to clarify that it is about all types of Magpie, not primarily the Euroasian one. In particular, I have added text to the lead linking to the particular types of Magpie found in different places and adjusted the banner. PeterEastern (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying scope of article 

message: Added this short section. Something I heard on a radio program. Sorry, no reference but AGF please my fellow editors. SmokeyTheCat 10:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Even assuming good faith, I don't believe this applies to all or even most of the listed species in the article. It's not appropriate anyway, it's highly speculative and "something I heard on the radio" gives no reason to believe this supposed etymology is true. It's also contradicted by the OED which says that it's a diminutive of Margery or Margaret plus "pie" which refers to the plumage of the Eurasian species  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name 

message: Hi! This article does not have a link to the Spanish Wikipedia. I tried to add it, but the situation is a little complicated, because there is not a one-to-one correspondence between the Spanish Wikipedia articles related to magpies and the English Wikipedia.
This article is related to four Magpie genera (Pica, Urocissa, Cissa, Cyanopica). However, the Spanish Wikipedia does not have an article related to these group of magpies. In the Spanish Wikipedia, the corresponding term associated to magpie (urraca) talk about a particular species, the P. Pica (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pica_pica). I tried adding this Spanish article as the Spanish equivalent to the English one, but because it is already linked to the English article of the P. Pica, it was not possible.
I realized this is a minor issue, but it would be great if someone knows how to fix it. I know writing an Spanish version of the article will solved the problem, but that seems overkill given that there already several magpies related articles. Ajweinstein (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Spanish Wikipedia