lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war/Workshop

message: I feel that Jimbo's desysoppings should be handled as an injunction. --Phroziac . o º O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 14:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense provided the case is wrapped up quickly. Some of these can take months to sort everything out and that would seem like an unjustified waiting period to me - especially as other 'wheel warriors' have not been so treated to date (or even in this very dispute). Perhaps the arbitors could concentrate on that issue separately before the other questions raised by these events. --CBD ☎ ✉ 15:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I too concur with Phroziac. I was struggling for the word "injunction" and I did not know where to put my comments as this is the first RfAr that I am closely following. I believe that Jimbo desysopped some sysops more to put an end to wheel-warring than to punish them. I hope that the arbcom, as a part of the remedy, would also establish some sort of wikiquette for admins whose actions can be construed as wheelwarring. Not all wheelwarring needs to be bad; if an admin makes a mistake, another admin can undo it, right? --Gurubrahma 12:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Niall

message: I don't think Niall can be attributed as an Irish name. Perhaps you should look at NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.62 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 6 February 2006‎
This article is substandard, although I do not see why it doesn't conform to a neutral point of view
--Jasonm 21:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early discussion

message: I think the page has been largely fixed since these posts, but I'm intrigued to know why there was confusion on the point of Niall being an Irish name in the first place? May I assure any doubters, the evidence is clear and the name is definitely, 100%, Irish. Codeye (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niall IS an Irish name!
Talk:Bernardo Tolomei

message: There is some disagreement between sources about Bernardo's status. The Catholic Encyclopaedia and the Italian Wikipedia both refer to him as a saint. However, the Vatican here and the Olivetans themselves here call him "Beato", or "Blessed", and I think they are in a better position to know.Staffelde 15:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint or Blessed

message: This looks like it has been copied from the Catholic Encyclopedia here. Isn't this a copyright violation? Carcharoth 15:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. Hang on. That is a public domain work, as explained here. I'll add the template to the article. Carcharoth 16:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Masha Bruskina

message: I will  try to add more lines to this page, as I did a lot of researches in both Russian, Hebrew and English languages for the french Wikipedia version available here: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macha_Brouskina. I am referring particularly to Yakob Basin's and Mikhail Nordstein's chronicles, which are very informative.
--JeremyJeanguenin (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information and sources 
Talk:Sigma factor

message: What is the 'sigma' in sigma factor? Why the different numbers? (i.e. what is the naming convention based on?) It does not appear to be based on molecular weight as with the heat shock proteins (because sigma 70 is about 40 kDa, at least in the PDB). Is it a parameter based on ultracentrifugation? Thanks for any insight. --Dan|(talk) 16:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is indeed strange in PDB; for example http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1SIG shows about 40 kDa. But all textbooks I know, refer to sigma-70 as the name was given to indicate its molecular weight. So I can understand the confusion by Dan above. 2A02:8388:1603:CB00:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 19:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sigma number? 

message: Regarding the proposal to merge with Sigma protein and Sigma subunit by Tameeria:
:Support "Sigma protein" is completely redundant with this article and should not exist; "Sigma subunit" makes no sense without the background provided by this article.  Both articles should be redirects to this page.  Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 11:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support What Adrian says. Spitshine (talk) 11:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The "initiation factor" link at the beginning of this article directs to a description of translation, rather than transcription, initiation factors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.226.9 (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the tip.  I've fixed it by delinking initiation factor and linking "transcription" to Transcription (genetics). Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 11:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  link 

message: Should Specificity factor be merged into this article? I'll post further queries to appropriate people when I get the time - I just got back from vacation (if someone else wishes to do so, feel free!). Allens (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: Specificity factor
Talk:Video RAM

message: This page has been boldly edited to a redirect. If you feel that this was in error, please feel free to discuss your reasoning. Note that the primary discussion on this happened over on the Talk:framebuffer page, when it was suggested that VRAM be merged with framebuffer. A decision was reached that VRAM should be redirected to DRAM as the DRAM page has the same info, but places it better in context and provides more technical details. Jbanes 15:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Knight banneret

message: According to different sources several knight banneret were granted at the battle of Edgehill. And The Gentleman's magazine, Volume 195 p. 46 suggests that there were later creations. -- PBS (talk) 13:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last knight banneret 

message: I removed the description of a knight as "a commoner of rank". This is patently incorrect: knights were most definitely gentry (in England) and nobles (on the continent)--not commoners. A commoner of rank would be a sergeant, yeoman, or franklin. 2601:5C7:200:580:A405:4BFE:276:92A7 (talk) 17:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Error
Talk:Stravaganza (series)

message: This whole page thing caption is Wrong! That's should be only Stravaganza, because here tell every books in Stravaganza series. Not only City of Masks book...
--G-Z-M-E  Giulia.Ze.Maria : My talia name. 15:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the first book, the dedication is to Rhiannon. Does anyone know who this is?
:: Yes, it's me! --Rhi 17:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedication 

message: These need some serious editing - the level of the entries are well below standard. The actual information is less about the characters and more about what happens in the books, it needs to be more on topic. I will try and clean them up a bit when I have the time. (Emiwee 18:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: <- Discuss. --68.44.13.236 18:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading that article and the excerpt, I don't believe it's related to the article in anyway.  24.84.1.20 07:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think what I meant by that was that it needed to be disambiguated. It's possible I was unaware of Wikipedia's notability requirements at that point, or else I assumed from the way it was talked about in the article that it had to be notable. --68.44.253.17 (talk) 08:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[ABC Radio]] drama"? 

message: Why is there no publication data for these books. Even the dates of publication are not mentioned. Yworo (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication data
Talk:The Immortal Story

message: I removed the last sentence from this stub, which stated (you can view it in the history), that this was the only color movie Welles ever directed.  That is not true. F for Fake is in color. ColinKennedy 17:47, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Color

message: I added the WikiProject Television template because the film was originally made for French TV. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Television film
Talk:War-responsibility trials in Finland

message: This article is written in poor english and should be looked at by a native speaker. Get-back-world-respect 15:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I've added a variety of citation-requesting templates in the hopes of getting help. It's possible that much of this is available in the general references, but I don't read Finnish.
Anyone attempting to check statements in this article may also want to see if they can find a source for a statement  for lack of verification: "Shortly thereafter, the War Crimes Section of the British Foreign Office issued a statement that the British government would not wish to prosecute Finnish political leadership for crimes against peace." (End of "Background" section.)
—CrazyDreamer (talk) 09:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: NPOV-check-tagged the "See also" link to show trial because there's no clear evidence (to my eyes) in the article text that the trials were show trials. However, I can imagine that allegation being brought to bear by someone who is generally predisposed against the trials on other grounds. This could be adequately remedied by adding verified statements to the body of the article that the trials had predetermined outcomes.
—CrazyDreamer (talk) 09:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Except it was exactly that. The USSR (or the ACC) demanded that the political leaders must be found guilty. So their guilt had been predetermined even before the court even started. In fact the ACC intervened when the court verdicts were leaked to them and demanded harsher punishments and direct political involvement in the trials (which only made it even further mockery of justice). Furthermore the laws under which the persons were convicted were not permitted in Finland. So you had a trial were the laws and rules used to determine guilt were not permitted and where the guilt had been determined beforehand. What more do you need for it to have been a show trial? The whole thing backfired on the Soviets (and the Finnish Communists by proxy) quite badly.I'm not sure of the English language sources but Zhdanov in Finland page 34-38 describes it quite well. Or The Finnish War-Responsibility Trial in 1945–6: The Limits of Ad Hoc Criminal Justice? same author can be found from Martyrs and Scapegoats of the Nation? The Finnish War-Responsibility Trial, 1945–1946 pages around p. 526. Wanderer602 (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

text: Additionally there is a bit on Nenye's Finland at War: The Continuation and Lapland Wars 1941–45 in page 321 which also describes the nature of the trials. - Wanderer602 (talk) 12:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Show Trial"
Talk:Yokosuka Line

message: Is it 23.9km? Really?
: looking at the Japanese page, the 23.9 km refers to the actual Yokosuka Line between Ofuna and Kurihama stations. What is generally known as the Yokosuka Line is probably technically part of other lines, e.g. the Tokaido Line. Ianb 22:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah. I added a section on how the modern Yokosuka is actually patched together from the original Yokosuka, Tokaido Main, Tokaido Freight, and others. --- 68.90.45.10 (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Grizabella

message: When I went to see Cats I seem to recall the programme said that the song "Grizabella, the Glamour Cat" was based on a poem Eliot wrote for Old Possum's Book, but then decided was too sad to be included. Can anyone confirm this? Daibhid C 16:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it confirms it on the RUG wesite. Scibah 17:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this be part of the project relating to the animal? Its a artistic character who happens to be an animal? 68.45.58.49 04:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article has now been placed in care of "WikiProject Theater" Kpstewart (talk) 01:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cats project?
Talk:Antarctic realm

message: Should this article be named Antarctic ecozone? Speaking of which, why does that link redirect to Anatarctica? Gflores Talk 16:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, in parallel with Nearctic, Palearctic, Neotropic, etc. BeeTea 17:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Kajsa Bergqvist

message: Her indoor World record of 2.08 m (6 ft 10 in) is 33 cm (13 in) more than her height of 1.75 m (5 ft 9 in). And since according to Guinness the record for women in this feat belongs to 1.68 m (5 ft 6 in) tall American Yolanda Henry, who has jumped 2.00 m (6 ft 6¾ in), or 32 cm (12¾ in) over her height; Bergqvist's performance should be a record in this aspect as well.
Though Niki Bakogianni of Greece jumped 2.03 m (6 ft 8 in) in the Atlanta Olympics of 1996 for the silver medal, and her height was listed at 1.70 m (5 ft 7 in). So it could be a tie.
Interestingly, Bergqvist's compatriot Stefan Holm has likewise equaled the men's best performance for the very same feat. And he too did it indoors.
Update: Italy's Antonietta Di Martino has since jumped 34 cm (13½ in) over her height. --Anshelm '77 21:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Above her head 

message: The article may be improved by following the WPBiogaphy 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KrakatoaKatie 01:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: From the Biography section - "In Arnstadt Germany, 4th of February 2006, Kajsa set her first world record. A first attempt indoor leap of 2.08 m to surpass Heike Henkel's 2.07 m leap on 8th of February 1992"Shouldn't the other world records be mentioned as well? Thanks 77.125.83.128 (talk) 06:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kajsa set her first world record... 
Talk:Socialist Party of Azania

message: I took the initiative of breaking the article into sections since it seemed more like a disorganized wall-o'-text. Furthermore, the ideology section, which is disproportionately large, seems like more of an ad for the party, particularly where it uses populistic talking points. I also side with the argument of the guy further up who criticized the article primarily because of how the party looks to be more of a racialist party (Blacks, blacks, blacks all over the ideology portion).
I don't vouch for the removal of much or anything from the ideology section, but it does need a "criticism/controversy" section near the bottom to give an appearance of balance to the article. Plus, the activities of the party apart from the ideology is not given enough coverage in the article; can it be linked to events in which members of the party participated since the party's founding? 
Disclaimer: I'm African American (actually, I'm more of a "sooner"), libertarian, unconditionally anti-military/violence and fairly despising of authoritarianism. --Toussaint 23:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My contentions with the article
Talk:Ahmad ibn Tulun

message: I'm not sure about these, but they're awfully suspect. Ahmad ibn Tulun ([ history] · [ last edit]) and Mosque of Amr ([ history] · [ last edit]). Both by the same author. Both had "By A.I MAKKI" at the top of the article. I was unable to locate online sources for either of these articles, but searching for "By A.I MAKKI" returns a ton of hits, such as  and , suggesting that the legitimate author is a writer somewhere, and that these works are copied.  I didn't place the copyvio notice on the pages since I can't find a source, but if anyone else is able to come up with anything, feel free to add the notice. —Brim
----
The author, as you mention, is awfully prolific, and never sources any of his articles - he's either a genuis with total ability to recall minute detail, or he's writing research papers without citing his sources (which in academia we like to call "plagiarism").  
More to the point with his article is that very little of it is about Ibn Tulun himself - most of it is about the mosque, which has its own page.  The text isn't wikified, and while overflowing with detail, it's not well written.  If it is kept, it needs an awful lot of editing.  (And I'm not just saying that because I contributed to the Temp page).
Khowaga 18:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the article and replaced it with the temp page written by Khowaga.  Accordingly I've un-transcluded Brim's cv-unsure template above.  Thanks to all.  Chick Bowen 15:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: Shouldn't the WikiProjects be updated to GA? Adamdaley (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone forgot it during closing. Fixed it. Constantine   ✍  12:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update assessment to GA in WikiProjects?
Talk:Tropical Storm Josephine (1996)

message: Content is not bad but it needs to be expanded if this article is to be kept.  Mention could be made of the hurricane's effects on north carolina, in relation to Bertha and Fran and flooding issues. — jdorje (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Is this article really nessesary? The storm isn't notable and there isn't that much info in it. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 14:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Hurricanehink 16:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this storm has enough info that it could stay. Against Merge E-Series 17:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed Against Merge Storm05 17:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Alright, I'll merge it and bring the rainfall pic. Hurricanehink 20:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Back from the grave, eh? More info, and spelling and grammar fixes are needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo2
Talk:Glenn Howells

message: I have tried to create this page as a stub several times and it keeps on being deleted.
This time I have added considerably more detail.
Glenn Howells is a well known British architect and I don't believe this page deserves to be deleted.
(Getafix 17:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Local zeta function

message: Why is \exp\log{1-t} = 1/(1-t)?
:There was a minus sign missing in G. Charles Matthews 19:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The first sentence involving the variable s was deleted for several reasons.
First of all, it is misplaced, since the variable s does not appear anywhere else in the Formulation
section.  Moreover, making an analogy between global and local zeta functions will be confusing
to all but those experts who know a formulation in terms of schemes which encompasses both kinds.
Soon I'll insert a remark in the Motivations section that will (I hope) make the analogy clearer.
Mathtyke (talk) 10:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Formulation section
Talk:Tarrasch rule

message: The first sentecne of the article has been changed to say that the Tarrasch rule applies to certain endgames.  Actually it applies to many endgames.  It applies more often than not, I believe.  Also, it is at least as applicable in middlegames.  Do others agree with this?  (Perhaps I overemphansised the few exceptions I found.)  Bubba73 (talk), 17:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First sentence

message: In this article, as well as in the article Siegbert Tarrasch I find the following entry:
"Andrew Soltis quotes Tarrasch as saying "Always put the rook behind the pawn.... Except when it is incorrect to do so." (Soltis 1997:129)."
In fact, I found the text of the original modification by Tarrasch on this website: http://schachblaetter.de/?p=35 .
It is in German however, but Tarrasch has written it in a very humorous and satirical style, rather unlike his usual writing. I recommend it to everybody with understanding of chess (and preferable German, but in any case you will understand much from his diagrams and the kind of exceptions that led him to modify his rule).
It turns out that Tarrasch's modification of the rule was inserted in the 4th edition of "Die moderne Schachpartie" (Leipzig 1924, page 419-424). This is mentioned in Kamm's Tarrasch biography on page 506-507 (pagenumbers from German edition) and is also explained in German on the website http://schachblaetter.de/?p=36 . --Sir48 11:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tarrasch rule modification

message: The Tarrasch rule is so widely cited and applicable to so many games that I think it should be rated at higher than "low importance".  I'm changing it to "mid".  If someone disagrees, then please change it (and explain).  Bubba73 (talk), 02:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance rating

message: The endgame with Rook + 4 vs Rook + 3 given as analyzed by Kantorovich, 1988, and J. Streckner, 2003, has been written as now "winning".
This is not true.
Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual, 4th Edition, 2014, p 205 indicates that Pogosyan has found it to be a draw with 1...g5!! instead of 1...Rxf2? Several pages of detailed analysis then explains why it is now considered a draw.
This section needs to be updated.
TommyWP (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kantorovich / Streckner endgame is now (2016) back to being considered a DRAW.
Talk:Eisenmenger syndrome

message: I think the chapter on pathogenesis is wrong. In true Eisenmenger's, where the defect is post-tricuspidal, the right ventricle probably never loses it's muscular "neonatal" appearance. It's also probable that the physiologically pulmonary hypertension of the newborn perseveres in a lot of these cases, see: Hopkins WE. The remarkable right ventricle of patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. Coron Artery Dis. 2005;16:19-25. --Ekko 17:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial

message: The term "cyanose tardive" now redirects here. I think we ought to mention it somewhere. JFW | T@lk 13:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyanose tardive 

message: Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Name listed with no verifiable citations have been removed, please do not replace without verifiable citations. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of names

message: Hi, i think to make the explanation of the shunt reversal clearer, we could mention right ventricular hypertrophy before the sentence starting "Eventually, ...".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.237.123 (talk) 15:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention Right Ventricular Hypertension in Pathogenesis? 

message: I think the diagram used should have an English translation, to make it more easily interpretable by the reader on the English Wikipedia - I could volunteer to make one, but I would be using a translator program. --Sphecidae (talk) 18:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Support I came here to suggest that.--Brainist (talk) 20:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translation of diagram
Talk:Post Office Rifles

message: I've created an intro para for this article from its contents, as per Wiki style, but am completely ignorant of the subject. Could a knowledgeable person check I have not introduced any errors. Cheers, JackyR 17:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro para

message: Had a look seems ok, I'm not really an expert but one of my ancestors served in the post office regiment. I have added a list of those who died and served in there. ALso a good website to search for those who died in any wars is commonwealth war graves commision its got loads of info.  Pympster 16:41 28 April 2006 (GMT)
:Nice one. I've moved your lovely new link down to External Links. Cheers, JackyR 16:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: looks good