lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Customer experience management

message: Does anyone have any idea what this is? Jwrosenzweig 23:49, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I will do so.  Karsten, if you're reading this, please read a note I left you on my talk page?  Thank you. Jwrosenzweig 17:04, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: : Which VfD? This title has never been to V/AfD. -- RHaworth 12:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From VfD

message: I ran across some of the articles mentioned above, and would like to address them as a whole rather than individually if possible.  For most of them (all but 2?), there has been no effort to provide sources, and I think there may still be WP:NOT, WP:OR and WP:NOTABLE issues here that may have not been previously considered, or were assumed would be resolved with more contributions. --Ronz 03:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These word soufflés need stubbifying at the very least. I was going to remove the section "A CEM framework" as as copyvio from , and, considering that the second section, "Organization of CEM" smells just the same, and in view of the evaluation above, I'm absolutely convinced that that is another copyvio. So that leaves the first sentence, a nice little stub, I thought... until I realized from this historical version that it is word-for-word from Schmitt's book. OK, that leaves nothing but copyvio. I'm speedying. I'll leave this talkpage so people can read my reasoning. Bishonen | talk 01:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  Of the remaining links from above, only Customer satisfaction has progressed beyond the stubs that these all started out as.  The rest should be given as critical an eye as you have done here. --Ronz 01:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Hmmm.  Looks like it's all from Schmitt:  --Ronz 02:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Experiential world, Experiential platform, Brand experience, Customer interface, and Experiential innovation all appear just to be further summaries of Schmitt's book as this article was.  These remaing article's can't stand alone as they are, now that this main article is gone. --Ronz 02:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All speedied as copyvios. That was simpler than I thought, they were incredibly obvious. OK, the encyclopedia improved! :-) Bishonen | talk 11:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text:  I fully agree with Bishonen's objections in the prod message here. But what links here says that we need something on this title. If it survives as a redirect for a few days, I will fix the double redirects. -- RHaworth 12:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisit possible deletion, merge, etc
Talk:Tonberry

message: Just to let you know, Final Fantasy V had Tonberries near the end of the second world.  I don't remember if they were called that or not.
I highly suspect that the Japanese version of FFVI called them "Tonberry" rather than "Pugs" but I won't change anything because I have no proof to back that up.
These are some of the creepiest damn things. They've always seemed to me to be inspired by folklore or myth. Maybe Celtic? Anglachel 23:18, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)
:A bit late to respond, to be sure, but, yeah, they've always been called "Tonberry" in the Japanese versions. Ted Woolsey changed it to "Pug" for FF3US because of character limitations ("Master Tonberry" wouldn't fit, but "Master Pug" would), and the translators of the FF Anthology version of FF5 inexplicably called them Dingleberries. Don't know about any sort of mythological inspiration, though: as far as I know they were created for the series. But, yeah, they're creepy ~_~ – Seancdaug 04:17, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
::One of the coolest/creepiest original ideas in Final Fantasy, in my opinion. As for inspiriation, I was just thinking about the will o' the wisps phenomenon; often crafted by folklore into magical lanterns held by sprites that lead people to death. A creature holding a lantern to draw someone forward in a dark place and them stab them sounds perfectly at home with the will o' the whisps stories. I'm almost surprised it isn't already one. --Made2Fade 21:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Sturbridge, Massachusetts

message: Is there any particular reason why this page has such a long title, and isn't simply at Sturbridge? — Timwi 00:23, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: To distinguish it from the census-designated place Sturbridge, which is part of the town of Sturbridge and has its own article at Sturbridge (CDP), Massachusetts. That said, it doesn't really make much difference; if you want to move this article to "Sturbridge, Massachusetts", I won't stop you.  AJD 05:54, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: Aaron Burr , former American Vice President lived in Sturbridge as a child after his Parents and Granpsrents died of Cholera. He lived with his Uncle who was the Minister in Sturbridge. His Grandfather , Jonathan Edwards was a minister in Amherst famous for the “ Great Awakening Movement” . Wherever Edwards preached, thousands showed up. He was the “Rock Star” of his era. Burr went on to be a notorious scoundrel in political circles. The Biden’s are descended from the Burrs.  Sturbridge should be proud of Burr. Today Sturbridge politics follow the Aaron Burr tradition of extortion & double dealing. Watch the antics of Sturbridge ConCom on zoom or Facebook. Different rules for different people. If you are a relative of commission members you don’t need a permit. All others get dragged through the mud. Burr was famous for his conflict of interest of trying to make the Louisana Purchase by undermining Jefferson. He also tried to steal Florida. Must be something in the Sturbridge water! 2601:741:C280:370:F49A:1A12:7F6C:AFC8 (talk) 11:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aaron Burr- Historical Fact: Aaron Burr’s parents died of Cholera while living in Amherst . His granfparents adopted him and subsequently died of Cholera and he was sent to live in Sturbridge with his Uncle until his Uncle became a Minister at zprinceton College in NJ. I believe his Maternal Grandfather was Jonathan Edwards of the great awakening fame.
Talk:Vermont towns

message: Why was this turned into a redirect to List of towns in Vermont?  I intended the page to have more than simply a list of towns.  I was following the example of U.S. States -redjar 03/02/2004
:Then it might have been courtesy to mention as such in this talk page when the article was created.  The move was made because it was simply a list of towns in line with common naming conventions.  If, after you have added further info, it would still be appropriate to move the page back (it can still be called a 'list' even if it has other info on it) let me know and I will make the swap. -- Graham  :) 18:16, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Timothy Murphy (sniper)

message: I'm clearly sourcing the material. I thought you were supposed to give credit where it's due. I have a copy of the pamphlet if you want it scanned. If not, please don't vandalize the page. Sgt. bender (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the info is also included in the other source that is being used, and since that source is more authoritative and much more easily accessible for every Wikipedia reader, I have changed your source to the New York State Military Museum source. Fram (talk) 11:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defenders of the Frontier 

message: Reputed is given in the lede but it isn't followed up. The paper "The Other Mystery Shot of the American Revolution: Did Timothy Murphy Kill British Brigadier General Simon Fraser at Saratoga?" In The Journal of Military History 74(4):1037-1045 · October 2010. does investigate it saying that Murphy isn't named until 1845. Same paper casts doubt on the distance he was shot at. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:03, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Reputed'
Talk:Lockport (city), New York

message: This is a DUPLICATE page in the sense that there was already a pre-existing page for the Town of Lockport. Some of the material from this article has been placed in that article. The rest should be considered for the Erie Canal -- or just junked along with this page. Tmesipt. 3.3.04.
What's the address for the other page? Pollinator 02:51, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links#Proposal for New York villages within towns, it has been proposed that pursuant to WP:TWODABS, the more prominent of the entities listed on this page should be deemed the primary topic and moved to this page, and linked by a hatnote to the other entity. Please direct comments regarding this proposal to the discussion linked above. Cheers! bd2412 T 23:56, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Newfane, New York

message: Ok, this one is my fault. I overlooked the possibility of "Newfane (town), New York. I put the guts of this into that article so this one needs to GO AWAY. Tmesmpt 3.3.04.
:Actually, this one should have been kept.  The other one should have gone, since there is no other Newfane (so the "town" descriptor is unnecessary).  I'm going to do an unpopular cut-and-paste move, since I cannot move it the normal way since this page exists. OzLawyer 15:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

message: Can we update the photo of this terrorist to his wanted poster? The poster has the current pic as well as two of his disguises, 
http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/msnbc/Components/Slideshows/_production/ss_060608_zarqawi_/ss_060608_Zarqawi_07.jpg Long2181998 (talk) 03:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The current image is more relevant than the one you provide - the lead image in a biography should be only an image of the subject. Tollens (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean this is literally the current image of the subject in addition to his disguises to evade prosecutions? Idk how the current image is better when the new image has both the current image + latest updates? Long2181998 (talk) 17:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't an image of him, it's an image of a poster. Per MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE,  - he does not look like a poster. Tollens (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2023 

message: B403 Civil Affairs, CAT from Al Kisik interpreter got the first call on where Zarqāwī and his family where located Ejoseph234 (talk) 06:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 June 2023 

message: Zarqāwī was first reported to us forces from CAT B403 interpreter from AL Kisik Ejoseph234 (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 June 2023 (2)
Talk:Ohio University

message: It appears that there is some disagreement as to what Ohio University's endowment figures are.
The Board document that is currently cited  shows "The University and Foundation currently hold investments with a total market value of $1.2 billion." However, not all investments are permanently endowed. 
Multiple parts of the cited document (pages 234, 240, 241) show the "endowment market value" of $650.2 million at the end of FY22. This matches up with endowment figures in citations for other universities that report figures to the National Association of College and University Business Officers.  Note that the $746,956k figure reported by NACUBO matches the $747.0 million figure on page 240 in the Board document. This $747.0 million figure (2021) is updated to $650.2 million in 2022. When the NACUBO reports FY22 endowments, they will report $650.2 million.
The $1.2 billion number is not the university's endowment, it is the market value of their investments. Hope this clears up any confusion! SkiesWillReign (talk) 02:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://catmailohio.sharepoint.com/ is a private site, not publicly accessible, so cannot be used as a source for figures here. General Ization Talk   02:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comment! It looks like your reversion linked the source to the sharepoint site, so I've corrected the figures and citation to the NACUBO figures. The sharepoint website is directly linked to from the Board of Trustees website for future reference and discussion. SkiesWillReign (talk) 02:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I didn't note that the content before your edit also sourced a document hosted at catmailohio.sharepoint.com, though that agenda appears to be publicly accessible.  The NACUBO site is probably a better source. General Ization Talk   03:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endowment 

message: Anna Bekiersky Giel.zinken (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bekierski
Template talk:Cellular structures

message: Has anybody else noticed that Ribosome is listed under the section reading "sub-organelle, found within the nucleus"? Am I incorrect that ribosomes are not found within the nucleus, but a localized on the rough endoplasmic reticulum and free in the cytoplasm? – ClockworkSoul 11:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sub-organelle, found within the nucleus" isn't a section, it's referring to the organelle directly before it (the nucleolus). 218.186.9.6 10:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ribosomes 

message: Eukaryotic cilia/flagella are intracellular organelles not extracellular. --kupirijo (talk) 10:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Undulipodium

message: If one starts to mention the macromolecular complexes found within the cells (e.g. ribosomes, spliceosomes, proteasomes, vaults...) then where would one stop? Anything larger than 10 nm? Anything about which article exists (even protein dimer is a complex, sometimes macro-molecular complex)? Only the articles about the complexes which have Good or Featured article status?
Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 20:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Macromolecular complexes

message: There's been the discussion to not add more obscure organelles as that would make the list of organelles too long, but could we include Spitzenkörper or Polysomes? These two are somewhat obscure compared to more famous organelles like the Golgi, but as Spitzenkörper is limited to hyphae, so are parenthesomes. Tridwoxi (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spitzenkörper 

message: Are nitroplasts notable enough to include in the template? There are other cases of vertically-inherited endosymbionts with reduced genomes that are not included. Arctostaphylospallida (talk) 05:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit on 18 April 2024‎ added Nitroplast
Talk:Slow play

message: I boldly rewrote the article. I'm still not particularly happy with it, but at least it has more of an encyclopedic tone about it now. Can anyone find a reference for fishing for overcalls? I'm not sure the topic deserves inclusion in the article. Opinions? Also, I think the term "slow play" is far more common today than "sandbag". Any consensus on renaming the article to "Slow playing (poker)"?--Toms2866 18:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good idea.  Slow playing and slow play is far more common.  However there are existing redirects from Slowplay and Slowplaying, so perhaps one of them should be chosen. Scrunching the words together is done.  On the other hand, Slow playing (poker) uses the words separately and is a normal structure so I'd support the move if you want to do that -- also setting up a redirect from Slow play (poker). 2005 19:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article from "Sandbagging (poker)" to "Slow play (poker)". I picked Slow play instead of Slow playing to stay consistent with the other poker articles, which tend not to use the "ing" ending: Draw (poker), Check-raise (poker), Isoloation (poker), etc. The page's edit history and talk page moved over fine. I fixed the double redirects.--Toms2866 21:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite

message: Sandbagging is NOT the same as slowplaying, one is not a "special case" of the other. This is made clear on the link provided to Sklansky. He says they are not identical. In fact, it's worse than that -- they're not even similar. A slowplay is an attempt to KEEP people in a pot, when you have what you think is a very strong hand that will almost certainly win. A check-raise is most often used to KNOCK PLAYERS OUT of a pot, when you think you have a strong hand, but not a VERY strong hand. This goal is exactly the opposite goal of a slowplay. I think this really needs to be cleared up (Sklansky's book is a good place to start). Revolver 04:27, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that Sklansky differentiates between check-raising and slowplaying as you described. There's a separate article for sandbagging (poker), so I'm inclined to mention the difference between slow-playing and check-raising and reference the check-raise article.--Toms2866 21:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Check raising as a slow play
Talk:Steven Hawley

message: What are astromaterials? Moon rock? Meteorites? Mr. Jones 15:12, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: This reads WAAAY too much like a personal page. Shouldn't this be limited to the NASA awards? 66.115.217.67 (talk) 21:13, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honors 

message: time in infobox does not match what's in text!  2601:19C:527E:56C0:4580:F690:FFE2:7300 (talk) 20:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  time in space
Talk:Cadastral divisions of Victoria

message: I've never heard of these before. Are they still in any current use, or purely historical? Ambivalenthysteria 07:47, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see. Maybe that could go in the article? Ambivalenthysteria 11:46, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: Are you sure it is 2914? Land titles in victoria says 2004 --Astrokey44 12:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (I added that it seems.) Perhaps there’s 910 townships? IIRC the figure came from one of a vic.gov.au site, but I can’t find it any more... This is, of course, why every fact you add should come complete with a citation/link... (Also, your link is a local council website. Just pointing it out, because the linktext you provide makes it sound like it’s a state government one.) —Felix the Cassowary 11:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ah, 2914 probably more likely then. It says it at landata.vic.gov.au. Also, where does the 1890 date come from? There arent any new counties added after the current 1877 map - see the same counties on this 1897 map - perhaps 1890 was the date of the last change/adjustment to the existing counties?  --Astrokey44 00:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was wondering the exact same thing—you’re going to have to ask User:Adam Carr about that one. It’s been there since the article was first created. (I have assumed also that the boundaries were probably changed at some point between the two dates.) —Felix the Cassowary 08:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of parishes 
Talk:Estate in land

message: Are you sure about the equitable estates part of this? Neither liens nor easments are creatures of equity, although they can both exist in equity: so can other estates in land because "equity follows the law". There are very real distinctions (in my jurisdiction at least) between legal and equitable liens and easements. I would be surprised if any other common law country was different, but stand to be corrected. Anyone know? Francis Davey 19:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is more -- what about Mortgages?
*Shouldn't future estates, such as reversion, remainder, possibility of reverter, and right of reentry/power of termination be included, as estates that are not possessory (since the estate holder is not currently in possession) but are freehold (since the holder will or may at some point have freehold control of the estate)?  None of these seem to be mentioned here.  However, I am by no means an expert, so I don't want to make the change and misinform people if there's something I'm not catching. 70.73.37.146 02:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: This article seems to have very little merit to it.  It is a mere skeleton without flesh.  The article Estate (law) has been fleshed out to provide the detail and has cross-references to related topics on the right hand side.  There is a category 'Real property law', which also covers the ground.  There are a wide variety of possible equitable interests.  Furthermore, easements (which appear to have their own article are legal not equitable interests (at least in English law), which are owned by the owner of the dominant tenement.  I am not categorising this as an 'article for deletion', but would appreciate other users' comments on this.  Peterkingiron 20:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My view is that there should be an article about estates in land. The concept of an estate is quite an important one, which has evolved in a complex way over time and deserves an article. What is here is plainly wrong for English law and probably misleadingly confused for all other jurisdictions, but I simply don't know enough comparative property law to simply delete bits. If I have time I might have a go at a complete re-write and do my best. Francis Davey 17:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested deletion