Talk:Richard Mentor Johnson

message: Vice President of the United States says he was a Democrat; this says he was a Democrat-Republican. Which is it? --Golbez 06:37, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, not quite ... he started his career as a Democratic-Republican; once that party broke up in the 1820s, he aligned himself with Jackson's faction, which was known as the Democratic Party by the time of his Vice-Presidency.  I'm adding the Democratic designation to his infobox in line with the style for Van Buren, his predecessor in the vice presidency. --Jfruh (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  older entries 

message: Richard Mentor Johnson never married. I've read many references that say he had a long-term relationship with a family's slave, Julia Chinn. He had two daughter with her that he married into white society. After Julia's death he had a relationship with another slave that ended badly--he sold her at auction. I live in his home county, Scott County KY. Our library has many sources for this information.--FloNight 04:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never Married 

message: Please expand, he must have had other careers than a barman.
The Ronin 16:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career 

message: ;Added material on Johnson's interracial relationship and its political effects; deleted unnecessary links; other tweaks. 
I expanded the discussion of Johnson's interracial relationship, explaining that it was, very unusually, overt, and that it was notorious, with an example. I also explained exactly how this affected his political career in 1836-1840.
Also, the quoted version of his "election slogan" was incomplete.
Finally, every date and year mentioned was a link, which is not appropriate.
I added links to US Vice President and to some other references that might require explanation.
--Rich Rostrom 04:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup

message: On balance, I am happy to pass this article as a GA. It is decently written, well-sourced with a wide range of references and appears to conform to all other guidelines. Should the authors wish to take the article further, I would suggest obtaining at least one thorough copyedit, as the prose is not of the brillant standard required by FA. One other minor problem is that the article includes several unecessary links (e.g. riot). Otherwise this is a very nice article, well done.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: Don't worry about it too much; FA operates on a tight schedule, and it will take you a while to absorb the unsolicited advice. Come badk when you're done. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 05:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non promotion

message: I have access to the 1833 life by Emmons, and the 1843 by "a Kentuckian". (Meyers is out.) Both are manifestly campaign biographies, and of limited reliability; but they are not the same book, and both should be consulted, although not trusted (Johnson's publicity is part of the subject here). ANB and Pratt may be the best modern biographies. Good luck. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that information. I've requested the Pratt biography on Interlibrary Loan. Did you have any luck digging up the reprint of the "Father of American Cavalry" article? If not, I can request the book in which it was reprinted on ILL as well. I located it in several libraries within 100 miles of me. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 23:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Pratt does contain the Cavalry article, according to the copyright page (or do you mean Meyers?).Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant the Pratt work. I'll try to get that on ILL. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 12:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I just got Life and Times on ILL for about a month. (Thanks U of L libraries!) I'm going to try and get the article in shape over the next two weeks. That leaves another two weeks for the FA nom to pass or fail before I have to return the book. I've also requested the Pratt work on ILL. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 14:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Would anybody mind if I redid the format: I dislike two results of : Last names should be second, so we can link, and dates should not be third unless we expect, as we do not here, two different sources by the same author? 
FA shouldn't mind as long as we are consistent; cite templates are not required.
If I can change, I would like to do so before I add Pratt. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "Last names should be second, so we can link." I assume you are talking about something that can't be done using the authorlink argument to ? Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 12:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, something much simpler than authorlink: Fletcher Pratt, Eleven Generals; Studies in American Command, William Sloane Assoc., (1949):  "Richard M. Johnson: Rumpsey-Dumpsey", the fourth chapter, pp. 81–97. No masking, no template, just straightforward formatting. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it doesn't bother FA reviewers, it doesn't bother me. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 19:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer Chicago style, which looks more professional on history articles, but since there are about 100 different citation styles used on Wikipedia—many of them seemingly invented on the spot—I don't think it really matters that much, as long as the needed information is there. —Kevin Myers 06:05, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography

message: I'm going to my local college library this afternoon, and am going to try to pry out of JSTOR the following articles:
* Some Demagogues in American History American Historical Review 1951
**A long rant on demagogues through history; says very little about Johnson, attacks Ely Moore as a hay-weighing monopolist and a fake workingman (and supporter of convict labor.
* Prelude to Abolitionism: Sabbatarian Politics and the Rise of the Second Party System Journal of American History 1971
**An attack on Schlesinger's Age of Jackson in the interests of the Christian party. Mentions Johnson only as the putative author of the Sabbataruanism Report, and sneers at him for seeing a threat to religious freedom in a change of postal regulations. 
* "The Most Delicate and Exciting Topics": Martin Van Buren, Slavery, and the Election of 1836 Journal of the Early Republic 1998
**Says only that Van Buren would have preferred Rives, but that "the administration" burdened him with Johnson. Waffling about unsuitable domestic arrangements. 
* Davy Crockett and the Thieves of Jericho: An Analysis of the Shackford-Parrington Conspiracy Theory Journal of the Early Republic 1999
**Argues that Crockett was always anti-Jackson. The only mention of Johnson is that James Strange French (whom our author claims wrote much  of the Crockett literature) included an appendix on Johnson and Tecumseh in his novel Elkswatawa, and is therefore not anti-Jackson or part of a Whig conspitacy to present Crockett as the real frontier hero.  
* Congressional Attitudes Toward Military Preparedness During the Monroe Administration Military Affairs 1976
**Quotes Johnson as opposing standing armies under Monroe, as being the "fatal and bloody instrument" by which ambitious men have effected every great revolution in history. (House of Repr. 12 Feb 1818)
* From Old Hickory to Sly Fox: The Routinization of Charisma in the Early Democratic Party Journal of the Early Repubic 1991
**Johnson and Rives; again, "the administration" supported Johnson, although Jackson did not want Johnson as running mate and heir in 1832. Phrases as "Judge  William Smith of Alabama was Van Buren's running mate in Virginia", which is not a matter of faithless electors; Virginia (alone) declined to be pledged to Johnosn. 
* The Antimission Movement in the Jacksonian South: A Study in Regional Folk Culture The Journal of Southern History 1970
**Another mention of the Postal Report, by the same author. This time adds that Johnson "urged Federal relief for a mortgaged Baptist college in the Federal District", citing Meyer 259ff, 376 ff. 
* The Shawnee Prophet, Tecumseh, and Tippecanoe: A Case Study of Historical Myth-Making Journal of the Early Republic 2002
**Discredits Anthony Shane's statements on Tecumseh because RMJ introduced him to Benjamin Drake, who wrote a life of T. That's all. 
Also ran across these which aren't in JSTOR:
* Dissertation which discusses RMJ. 
* Jacksonianism and the Promise of Improvement by Daniel Walker Howe, which Google Scholar says mentions RMJ. 
* Let the Youths Beware 
I may or may not be able to get all of these, the local university doesn't subscribe to all the journals in JSTOR. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh. Didn't get a single one. Sorry. I swear, this local college has the oddest choices in what they get from JSTOR and what they don't. I'll try to get to University of Illinois sometime. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

text: What's the title/author/etc. on the dissertation? If that's on ProQuest, I might be able to get at it. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 17:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  What's love got to do with it? The dynamics of desire, race and murder in the slave South by Powell, Carolyn Jean, Ph.D., University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2002, 213 pages; AAT 3039386. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Darn. We must not subscribe to the right journal to get that one. Too bad. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 17:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sources

message: The article Bryan Station has an image that could be used here: the famous incident of the women going out of the fort to get the water. However, The Kentucky Encyclopdia entry on Bryan Station says (p. 134) that this story was "long believed true but now relegated to legend." Alas. —Kevin Myers 16:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great catch on both accounts. I think the incident still bears mention, even if we have to end it with "but this all proved to be legend." Wonder which source(s) TKE bases this on? Those sources might have additional pertinent details on this event. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 17:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

text: State historian James Klotter is supposed to be at my local library tonight. I hope to attend the appearance and see if I can ask him to clarify this point, since he was a co-editor for The Kentucky Encyclopedia. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 12:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a popular legend; the DAR commissioned a memorial in the shape of a well as the site. I think a photo of this is with the WP article on Bryan's Station, Kentucky. I have a heroic woman of that group among my ancestors, too.Parkwells (talk) 15:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bryan Station 

message: I have expanded the information about Johnson's trademark red vest; I have seen it mentioned in multiple sources, so it was apparently significant. However, I don't believe the information belongs in the lead, where it is presently located. I'm open for suggestions as to where it should go. Either discuss them here, or be bold and move it to a new location. Thanks. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 12:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red vest 

message: Time Magazine recently did a feature on the "15 Worst Vice Presidents" in United States history, and Johnson had the misfortune to make the list. Something in the article that I found quite fascinating was a mention that while in office Johnson proposed an expedition to the North Pole for the purposes of drilling a hole to the center of the earth. I'm not sure I understand the supposed physics behind the idea, but to me this seems like a very colorful story, and perhaps someone who knows this article better than I do could find a way to add it in, perhaps with additional explanation beyond what is provided in Time.  Adlerschloß (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article already mentions this, minus the reference to the North Pole. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 00:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I didn't see that there. Adlerschloß (talk) 01:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I flagged as dubious the statement "The proposal was soundly defeated, receiving only twenty-five votes." about his 1823 proposal since according to List of U.S. states by date of statehood there were 24 states (and 48 senators?) in 1823.  Can anyone check this in the source?Langhorner (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to check that out if I can get to the library. I added the fact, and I know the book came from my local library. Acdixon (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 20:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Better late than never. The source says: "Johnson even tried to persuade Congress to pass a bill that would fund an expedition to the center of the earth. The bill received only twenty-five votes and was soundly defeated." The implication seems to be that it garnered only twenty-five votes in Congress, which probably indicates the Congress as a whole (House and Senate combined.) Acdixon (talk • contribs • iki=wikipedia&lang=en  count) 18:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed North Pole expedition 

message: In the intro, it says Johnson was chosen US senator to replace John Crittenden in 1819 when the latter resigned to become attorney general. However, Crittenden didn't become AG until 1841 (& again in 1850). The Crittenden article confirms this and goes on to say that he resigned in 1819 because he found state politics more interesting than that of Washington. Please consider a rewrite of the phrase about the resignation.
Smallfixer (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Crittenden's Resignation

message: In the section on his relationship with Julia Chinn, the article links "sold at auction" to the article "Slave auction."  But this does not appear to be the correct type of slave auction, as it is redirected to the page on charity slave auctions.  There is an italic link from there to the page on "Slavery," but I think this is where the link should actually go in the first place.  IrishCowboy (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Fixed. I think this link has changed since I first added it to this article. Acdixon (talk • contribs • iki=wikipedia&lang=en  count) 14:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave Auction 

message: I'm not fond of the way that the info box lists Johnson as unmarried, so I edited it.  Before 1852, Kentucky recognized common-law marriage.  If Julia Chinn is Johnson's common-law wife, then he is not unmarried.  I looked, and I don't think Wikipedia has a policy on how to handle common law marriage. 
Debbie W. 04:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - this was the reality, as were his two acknowledged daughters.Parkwells (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital Status (Common-Law) 

message: While in many ways Julia Chinn was treated by Johnson as a common-law-wife, she was clearly not leagally acknowledged as such. I am torn on how best to consider this matter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The evidence indicates that Johnson treated her as his wife. I would say we should do the same in the infobox and lede, since the entire tragic situation is clarified in the article. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

text: It's been a while since I worked on this article, but I tend to remember the sources saying she was his common law wife, not just that he treated her as such. That said, I'm not sure it was truly a legal arrangement, since the law may have prevented interracial marriage at that time. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 15:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The law likely prohibited interracial marriage, but I wonder why he didn't free Julia Chinn and, especially their daughters. He was open about them and probably could have gotten dispensation from the legislature if he needed it. If KY law was like VA's, the daughters would have been considered "born into slavery" because their mother was a slave, putting them at risk for their entire lives, regardless of their appearance and the status of their father. He seemed to care for them, so he should have freed them. In VA at the time, a person who was seven-eighths or more white was considered legally white under the law - meaning that, if free, Julia Chinn and her daughters (who were 15/16 white) would have been considered white, not black. I would imagine KY had similar laws and will try to find out. Johnson settled property on his daughters, but he also could have guaranteed their futures by freeing them. The fact that he took up with two other slave women after Chinn's death, and sold off one who chose another man, does make one wonder about him.Parkwells (talk) 15:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we refer to Julia Chinn as a wife 

message: The version I have seen is:
Ripsey Rampsey
Rumpsey Dumpsey
I, Dick Johnson
Killed Tecumseh
Does anyone have a primary source for either this, or the version in the article? 73.70.250.164 (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The version in the article has an in-line citation in the third paragraph under the Election of 1836 heading. I have also seen other versions of the rhyme in other sources. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 16:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhyme

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Richard Mentor Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619045422/http://loc.harpweek.com/LCPoliticalCartoons/DisplayCartoonMedium.asp?MaxID=&UniqueID=5&Year=1836&YearMark= to http://loc.harpweek.com/LCPoliticalCartoons/DisplayCartoonMedium.asp?MaxID=&UniqueID=5&Year=1836&YearMark=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080617221601/http://digital.library.okstate.edu/Chronicles/v006/v006p453.html to http://digital.library.okstate.edu/Chronicles/v006/v006p453.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030162210/http://www.americanaexchange.com/NewAE/aemonthly/printarticle.asp?from=a&id=118 to http://www.americanaexchange.com/NewAE/aemonthly/printarticle.asp?from=a&id=118
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619045422/http://loc.harpweek.com/LCPoliticalCartoons/DisplayCartoonMedium.asp?MaxID=&UniqueID=5&Year=1836&YearMark= to http://loc.harpweek.com/LCPoliticalCartoons/DisplayCartoonMedium.asp?MaxID=&UniqueID=5&Year=1836&YearMark=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Mentor Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421201514/http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/vanburen/essays/vicepresident/1862 to http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/vanburen/essays/vicepresident/1862
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Footnotes 17 & 18 (as accessed 20 Feb 2021) cite "Great Mountain Freeman." Should this be "Green Mountain Freeman"? See https://www.loc.gov/item/sn84023209 --A12n (talk) 05:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct citation? 

message: The second paragraph of Marriage and family seems very confused and possibly from an unreliable source. It seems Daniel was living in Canada, not Benjamin, and Marcellus was his son, not his and Julia's brother. There's also a questionable reference to the Chinn family in the fifth paragraph. Dates are missing for the marriage to Julia and birth of their daughters, as well as his father's death. 174.67.226.163 (talk) 08:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinn family