Talk:Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset

message: Hi, I added in info about the replacement of Thomas's hard drive and the jury instrution.  With what I knew, the page sounded too pro-Jammie.  70.112.180.57 23:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: added some info

message: Gathered funds are so far around 1/10th of the demanded amount, not bad so far, but her page lags considerably behind the actual figure donated, hence can't really add a figure to this wikipage yet.
Would also be nice to add something more about the groundswell this case has triggered, but it probably wont rise to prominence until it re-enters the mainstream news in about 6 months.
218.214.138.11 03:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: her site needs a better ticker, so that this page could be kept accurate

message: I don't need any major label. I don't need "Music Managers". I don't need media distribution on specialized hardware. This is not about protecting the rights of the artists.
Most of the artists don't get their fair share of the profit from the major labels anyway. This is about establishing continuity for something we do not need anymore just to artificially keep up the salary of people who think that they should get millions of dollars for absolutely worthless work (someone might call it evolution, 10 years ago it made sense to sell a compact disc to distribute 700 MB of data and have some companies doing this, right now this seems idiotic). It is absolutely normal in economy that business-areas come and go because of the change of peoples needs. What the major labels do is not a need anymore. I want to pay my songs directly to the artist. The artist should get 100% of what I pay for. And the distribution channel for upcoming artists is the Internet! Isn't this normal in 2010? It was normal even in 2007.
Thomas downloaded old songs which she would not have been able to buy DRM free and directly from the artist. These songs just are not worth thousands of dollar. They are worth what people are willing to pay for them. Obviously for these songs there are people who do not want to pay anything at all. And because music is a type of information Arrow's Information Paradox is applicable. Nobody knows if he likes a song before he has downloaded and heard it. And if you download something, it is normal (and it was in year 2007) for everyone whose machine is a node in a network to cache the just retrieved information and give it to other nodes requesting it.
So what the fuck is this trial about? We should not allow this kind of show trial to happen. Maybe we should pay her fine via flattr or something like that.
84.134.115.42 (talk) 07:39, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a forum. The talk page is just for commenting on how to improve the article, not to express personal opinions. See WP:NOT or WP:TP for more information. - Pedro7AC4 (talk) 12:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this all justified?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724061210/http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/jury_instructions.pdf to http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/jury_instructions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625191218/http://beckermanlegal.com/Documents/virgin_thomas_080515OrderOralArgument.pdf to http://beckermanlegal.com/Documents/virgin_thomas_080515OrderOralArgument.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707221243/http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/virgin_thomas_090618JuryInstructions.pdf to http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/virgin_thomas_090618JuryInstructions.pdf
*Added  tag to https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/mwbourgeois/web/06-cv-1497/336-1.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090711200650/http://beckermanlegal.com:80/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/virgin_thomas_090706DeftsMotNewTrial.pdf to http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/virgin_thomas_090706DeftsMotNewTrial.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/01/judge-slashes-monstrous-jammie-thomas-p2p-award-by-35x.ars
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111105041322/http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/minnesota/mndce/0:2006cv01497/82850/404/1.html to http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/minnesota/mndce/0:2006cv01497/82850/404/1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707221550/http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/virgin_thomas_101206DeftsMotion.pdf to http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/virgin_thomas_101206DeftsMotion.pdf
*Added  tag to http://ia700504.us.archive.org/21/items/gov.uscourts.mnd.82850/gov.uscourts.mnd.82850.457.0.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121102115512/http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9P9CPV03.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9P9CPV03.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130114054402/http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/webcal/jun12stp.pdf to http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/webcal/jun12stp.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130114054402/http://8cc-www.ca8.uscourts.gov/OAaudio/2012/6/112820.MP3 to http://8cc-www.ca8.uscourts.gov/OAaudio/2012/6/112820.MP3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified