lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samuel Orton

message: There's a nice bio of ST and JL Orton at Columbia University HSL Archives. It could be a useful starting point for anyone who wants to write up a bio of ST and JL Orton and their work. --Drmarc 01:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - this is a great beginning and its great to see this article.  I wrote a magazine article about Orton and his work about 3 years ago, so I've gone back and pulled the facts from the article.  I'll try to dig up my references and come back and add them as citations. Abigail Marshall 12:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Since you mention it, why is June Orton not mentioned at all in this whole article?  Seems weird.  209.175.45.151 (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting Point
Talk:Shawn

message: Hopiakuta 01:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is the American wiki.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taborlechner (talk • contribs) 17:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Since Sean redirects here, should we add Sean Connery and Sean Penn and Sean Young? CSWarren 20:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes we should. I went ahead and took it upon myself to create it. Tabor 22:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[sean]] [[shawn]] [[shaun]] 

message: The name is sometimes used for females when spelled shawn.Xp54321 (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Male/female

message: The content on this page was recently replaced with a few disambiguations including one to Shawn (given name) which is just a redirect to Sean. It'd be worth discussing here first to get an actual consensus on what these pages should contain. Cheers, — sligocki (talk) 03:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, well, specifically, you removed the list of people with first name Shawn ... I guess I don't know if that's a bad thing, but you did leave the list of people with last name Shawn, that seems kind of odd. I thought that perhaps your edit wasn't very well thought through. However, the Sean article is a lot tighter now. Cheers, — sligocki (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent removal of content
Talk:United States campaigns in World War I

message: This article needs cleanup for obvious reasons.  Discuss ideas here.  --APShinobi My Contribs 14:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Cleanup Tag 

message: There's a link to this from the section on the Somme Defensive, but no mention in the main article at Operation Michael.  No other mention of it in WP as far as I can see. No source for this mention. But the French 6th Engineers Regiment seems sometimes (not least in List of French Army regimentsto be called 6th Engineer Regiment, so there is now a redirect to that article.  I don't know whether the US unit of that name exists/ed or whether this unsourced section has got it wrong. I leave it to one of you military experts to sort out - I just dropped by while stub-sorting something called 6th RG and went on from there. PamD (talk) 18:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've turned the link back into a redlink by changing it to 6th Engineer Regiment (USA). If the article ever gets written, there'll need to be some hatnote or dab page to sort them both out. PamD (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  6th Engineer Regiment??? 

message: Or is that obvious? A huge amount of this page is simply copied from http://www.history.army.mil/html/reference/army_flag/wwi.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shylocxs (talk • contribs) 21:54, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism and uncited sources abound 

message: Line one talks about 13 campaigns, and then there are 14 sections - is one of the 14 not officially counted?137.222.248.27 (talk) 18:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of campaigns? 

message: No mention of Hamel (4 July 1918) where elements of the AEF were placed under Australian command and achieved America's first (as far as I can tell) offensive victory...?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hamel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.166.232.162 (talk) 15:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: More a battle than a campaign, I would have thought... Flanker235 (talk) 12:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Hamel? 
Talk:C. P. Ellis

message: I have tried to remove duplications and have attempted to give the article a more coherent chronology. Unfortunately, the conversational tone is too extensive to change, without having a greater knowledge of this individual, if the creation of errors is to be avoided. Obviously the account of his KKK involvement needs more development if a sense of Ellis' change of mind is to be appropriately conveyed. Philip Cross 18:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritng the article so that it is encyclopedic

message: The alleged Soutgern Strategy has no real relation to the story. The link should not be on the page. RichardBond (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Strategy
Talk:Dunc Munro

message: This article is going to become a stub; obviously, when his family emigrated to Canada from Moray (People from Moray category); and what he did after hockey. He was also associated with University of Toronto, where there is no link.
Bacl-presby 19:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mashup (video)

message: This is my first article I have tried to start from scratch. I will be working on this a lot. With links and references etc. But I could use any help that you'd be prepared to offer to get it off the ground. Thanks! Webchat 01:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: Um, wow.  I can tell that this could probably be a good article, but as of right now I can barely understand what it's saying - and I consider myself to be rather up on the metalanguage of memes, being an E.D.-er and a YTMND-er.
Right now, it - you know that blonde exec from the Simpsons, who's always trying to change Krusty the Clown and giving him buzzword-filled notes? - yeah, it sounds like this article was written by her.  The sentences really need to be written in a much simpler style, and expanded upon; remember, the people reading this article have presumably come to learn about something new, not to confirm already held knowledge.
I would help, but, uh, I came here to learn about Youtube Poop, something that has never made sense to me and now still doesn't -_-;;
--Anoma lee (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less Jargon Plz 

message: I dont really understand why Youtube Poop redirects here, since only few YouTube Poops fall under this defenition and Youtube Poops are only vaguely mentioned. 92.0.134.90 (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There should at least be a section in this article devoted to YouTube Poop. 128.211.198.168 (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Youtube Poop

message: This is a terribly written article and from looking at it I think that it needs a total rewrite. 109.76.250.251 (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Shoddy writing

message: it's VERY blant at the mo but if i work on it, there may be a YTP Page!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jowee the Raposa (talk • contribs) 17:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  made a userspace Youtube Poop page 

message: SETRIOUSLY  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.170.30 (talk) 05:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 YEARS FOR SOMEONE TO FINALLY MAKE A PAGE?????????? 

message: On 28.Feb.2014 I watched a YouTube video someone uploaded, that I believe would make an excellent example of a video mashup: they mashed up "Battlestar Galactica" (the REAL one, from 1978) with "Space: 1999."
I'm requesting permission to add the link under External Links.
If you wish to see it before making a decision, here's the link: "Battlestar 1999" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpB9NbPNNhE)
Shotguntony (talk) 00:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission Request
Talk:Carla Emery

message: I know the subject of the article is no longer living but I think this article seems rather promotional including external links to book promotional pages. Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 22:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article Seems Promotional and About Someone Who is Not Really Noteable
Talk:Carlos Cortez

message: It'd be great to see some of his work here - AKeen 16:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Vivmg (talk) 18:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST3150
Talk:Fort Amador

message: Right now, the article is about the Pacific coastal defenses, not Ft Amador itself.  Should it be renamed to reflect that, or split into the separate forts?  Because they are leneraly connected by the causeway, these instalations are more easily seen as a unt than many other harbor defenses.  Anmccaff (talk) 06:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split or rename?
Talk:César Lattes

message: This article could benefit from an Infobox:Scientist template and from subdivisions. There is no "Legacy" section, even though the impact of Lattes on Brazilian science was great and cut across disciplines. --Wloveral (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is needed here 
Talk:Fort Belvoir

message: The photograph included in this article is out of date.  A new section for the benefit of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency has been added to the right side of the building from the vantage of the existing photo.  It's hard to miss for anyone who's been there, and a newer photo would improve the accuracy of the article.  Please remove this comment once/if the photo has been updated.
Also, there is a lot more to Fort Belvoir than just the info mentioned in the first paragraph of the preview section, but the way it's worded now, it appears those four agencies (DLA, DCAA, DTIC, DTRA) are the main focus, when in reality they occupy only a portion of the fort, both in terms of land mass and personnel.  Could somebody look into this?
The school that moved to Fort Leonard Wood is NOT the "US Army Corps of Engineers School."  The US Army Corps of Engineers and the US Army Engineers Branch are two different organizations although there is a lot of overlap.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermin8 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added six new photos, current as of Oct 09.--Orygun (talk) 01:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: Any ideas which of the Units would be most appropriate to include :File:A package for Hitler 196462 edit.jpg, today's Commons POTD? This image (and its other versions) seem to be currently unused on the English Wikipedia. -- Trevj (talk) 10:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo - A package for Hitler, 1942 

message: Appendix E (pages 46-51) in Part III of The Naming Commission's Final Report to Congress has a nice history about the renaming of the fort (plus a few photos) that could be used to enhanced this article. -- 108.71.214.235 (talk) 08:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Belvoir and The Naming Commission's 2022 Final Report
Talk:Chalmers Goodlin

message: What about his combat service in the Israeli Air Force in 1948? Rudy Breteler 01:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If an un-sourced statement in the Mahal article is correct, he was partly responsible for shooting down three RAF Spitfires when he was serving in the IAF. In other words, him being a Canadian, I'm pretty sure it constitutes some sort of treason, amongst various other crimes. Pavuvu (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Charilaos Florakis

message: There are not clear guidelines for which articles should be high- or mid-importance, but this seems not to qualify as high.Argos'Dad 17:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:World Class Wreckin' Cru

message: This Page needs an accurate Discography! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaxine19 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: So u mean dr.dre is not that rich?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.210.17.6 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. Dre net worth

message: On the page of Battlecat (producer) is writen that Battlecat (producer) was also a member of the World Class Wreckin' Cru; I don't know if this is true. Could somebody check it and put add it if it's true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thug n g (talk • contribs) 19:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battlecat
Talk:Space Shuttle

message: Alought Historical background mentioned the history, not mentioned the root of the space shuttle, silbervogel. Is necessary to add it? Berkeley8 (talk) 20:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is necessary mention root of the space shuttle?  

message: Within this article, there's no description about the requirements to be a space shuttle crew. If there's one, I think it would help readers understand the rigorous selection process and training that astronauts undergo to become part of a Space Shuttle mission. I'm thinking about adding these two links with some explanation for each of them: . What do you think? Moonlight6928 (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Shuttle Astronaut Qualifications 

message: Support Vehicle, there isn't any mention about An-225, so we want to add some pieces of information about how An-225 supports space shuttles and briefly introduce now the status of An-225. I am going to refer to these two links: Antonov An-225 Mriya 
Please comment on if there is any concerns regarding my plan of changes. Thanks! Sir.Deai Bian (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The An-225 was designed and used as support vehicle in the Russian Buran program, as linked in See also. I don't see any reason to feature it prominently here. --Zac67 (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

text: The An-225 is related (or connected) to Buran (spacecraft), not the US Space Shuttle. -Fnlayson (talk) 03:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An extension to the support vehicle: An-225 

message: Greetings, I am from Chinese wiki. When editing the Chinese pages related to space shuttles, I find the pages quite unorganized, and have some questions that could be better answered by the English community.
# What is the relationship between Space Shuttle program and Space Transportation System?
## Did the STS become the space shuttle program, or are they separate
## Can they be treated as the same thing or put under one page (there was a Chinese page about STS that was not a Chinese version of the Space Transportation System, it only contained information about the space shuttle, and I merged it into the Chinese Space Shuttle program page, a Chinese version of the STS page never existed)
# When referring to names like Atlantis and OV-104, do they refer to a space shuttle or a space shuttle orbiter?
# When linking from other pages, when do you link to space shuttle and when to space shuttle orbiter?
# Is it correct to say that 
## a space shuttle is a spacecraft system, not a spacecraft nor a spaceplane
## a space shuttle orbiter is a spacecraft, spaceplane, and part of a space shuttle
Sohryu Asuka Langley Not Shikinami (talk) 08:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions related to Space Shuttle
Talk:Charles Harness

message: This should probably redirect to Charles L. Harness, as the two articles are about the same author, and the second is more complete.  I don't know enough about wikipedia editing to do it myself.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_L._Harness
76.0.25.128 21:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles Keating (businessman)

message: This article's new title is spelled incorrectly. I would revert the name, but I don't know how to do that. Why is a gender-neutral title needed anyway? Surely Charles Keating had a gender, no? --Miken2005 22:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Moved the article from Charles Keating (businesperson) to Charles Keating (businessperson). --Miken2005 05:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Seems pretty pointless, especially considering that the article itself still says "businessman" --Larrybob 21:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It seems to me like the original move from Charles Keating (businessman) to Charles Keating (businesperson) was done in extreme haste, given the point you raise as well as the obvious spelling mistake. I decided to assume that, despite such haste, the move was done in good faith, so I merely corrected the spelling instead of reverting the move. If you want to move it back to its original title, I have no objections. --Miken2005 20:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Businesperson?
Talk:Camp Bondsteel

message: The article claims there's an Anthony's Pizza, but a Post Exchange newsletter cites Stars & Stripes as saying the last European outlet closed in 2021. https://publicaffairs-sme.com/FamilyServingFamily/2022/02/09/waybackwednesday-for-national-pizza-day-the-story-of-the-exchanges-own-pizzeria/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:58B:D80:6C60:7531:695:95A4:E267 (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated PX information 

message: Does anyone not think that the tone banner should be removed? I read through the article and did not find any biased, overly dramatic, or any other non-wikipedia language. History person 2 (talk) 12:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone banner
Talk:Charles Kuentz (soldier)

message: This looks very like a copyvio from some journalistic source, which needs not so much cleanup as rewriting.  Unfortunately the editor who produced it has been inactive for about 18 months, but if Fabi87 is reading this it would be good to have some idea of the source of the text. Flapdragon 22:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed a copyvio, from this source: . Without any sign that permission has been given for us to use this article, it will have to be removed. Terraxos (talk) 22:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a slightly depressing note: this article was around for 18 months before anyone noticed the copyvio, and another 5 months before any of us did something about it... in future, if you think an article violates copyright, you should probably report it on Wikipedia:Copyright problems rather than just leaving a comment for someone else to find. Terraxos (talk) 22:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, I see an admin has now removed the copyright violating information and reduced this article to a stub, so problem solved. Terraxos (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 

message: A user called Bart Versieck keeps on changing the temperature conversion of -40 Celsius to -104 Fahrenheit, which is wrong. I've changed it back. -40C = -40F (it's the only temperature that is the same in both scales). Please, stop adding this error! 143.252.80.100 13:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it honestly? Extremely sexy 17:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: °F = (°C × 1.8) + 32 --> °F = (-40 x 1.8) + 32 = -72 + 32 = -40. Seems that the above comment is correct. Cheers, CP 18:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperature conversion 

message: I'd like some clarification on why this person is "clearly notable".  The article says nothing beyond the fact that the man was a soldier in World War I.  There were millions of those.  Why is this one any different?  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it because he served in two armies?  That wasn't in the text so I added it.  Doesn't seem like that big of a deal, especially in WWII.  Thousands (more?) of French, Polish, Russian troops were forced into the German army.  He served in the German army in WWI, then moved to France and served in the French army over 20 years later.  Then back to the German army because he had to.  I'm not impressed. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That article that is completely about him grants him enough notability in my book, and clearly enough to survive speedy. Send to AfD if you'd like. seresin | wasn't he just...? 21:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will put it to AfD.  If it survives, then maybe it will get some more attention.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I closed the AFD as keep: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Kuentz. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD
Talk:Charles L. Harness

message: Strange but true. I first came across him in 1973 and even at age 15 enjoyed The Paradox Men and The Ring of Ritornel immensely. However I only realised how good he was when I read The Rose 10 years later and as a result re-read the two earlier novels. They were even better than I remembered them. Why he isn't better known among the general SF readership beats me. -- Derek Ross | Talk 19:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relative obscurity
Talk:Carlisle Barracks

message: The barracks and Army War College were originally listed on the first list of candidate installations for closing; however, as of 2006 the barracks will not be closing and in fact is slated for additional funding/expansion: , 
 22:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Base Realignment and Closure, 2005|BRAC]]
Talk:Charles Laking

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Extremely sexy 21:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Center

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
35.31800, -94.28681
69.151.91.200 (talk) 18:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the whole installation covers a lot of ground. I've tweaked to coordinates to be nearer the center of it and adjusted the view diameter to include the entirety of it. Deor (talk) 16:24, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Charles Repenning

message: I removed the orphan tag, because there is now a link (from Paleoparadoxia). But was this proper?  I'm not sure: the tag itself says the article was an orphan because "there are not many links," which would seem to require more than one. However, the  FAQ, Glossary, and the orphan page all define "orphan" as "none." Jack 22:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Terry Britten

message: This article does not make clear that Britten emigrated to Australia from the UK. We have him born in Manchester, then suddenly writing songs for an Adelaide band. Something missing... ? 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:6967:DE89:15EB:16A1 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emigrant...
Talk:Chris Curtis

message: The two interview links take me to 404 plus a big red sign warning me of malware. Greets 85.180.201.114 (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 
Talk:Chris Whitley

message: Hi, this article needs some cleanup. 
*The lead gives too much info about CW's style and does not summarize his entire life and the entire article per WP:LEAD. 
*Excessive and duplicate wikilinks.
Please help to fix these. Thanks! -- — Keithbob • Talk •  14:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up Needed
Talk:Chuck Thompson

message: I have submitted said write-up to explain/suggest that the "incorrect" comment about Art Ditmar (bottom of 9th, 1960 World Series) was to have referred to the bullpen and was interrupted (being left incomplete) because Bill Mazeroski's HR was hit right then. Carlm0404 (talk) 04:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Write-up in talk page for Art Ditmar
Talk:Clement Meadmore

message: Am supposed to be in the police or cia, but, how i wish they will consider me in the United States of America.  Alphaeus212 (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY ARE PEOPLE NOT TAKEN FOR THIER NATURAL CHOICE OF JOB AS A RESULT OF THEIR REASONING  
Talk:Cliff Montgomery

message: Where does this "400 sailors" come from?  A destroyer wouldn't have anywhere near that many people on board. 104.153.40.58 (talk) 02:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  400