Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Malware

message: I thought project tags () went on an article's talk page, not the article itself.  -- rebug (talk) 01:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, project notices are supposed to go to the talk page. I moved them all. (at least based on whatlinkshere to the template.) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MalwareProject template 

message: Hi, only been with wikipedia a few weeks and when I saw this project I thought I'd join since most of the time I'm on DALnet, malware is a big problem for most of the people that come into the channels I'm on (tech support). Just a few suggestions/ideas/questions...
#I notice that some of the virus articles use the  template. Couldn't all malware articles use a variation of this box (Viruses, Trojans, Spyware, Adware, Dialers, etc)? Also, could some malware fall into more than one category - e.g. PSGuard?
#Should a  :Category:List of rogue antispyware, :Category:List of suspect antispyware, or something similar be created? Or would it all come under :Category:Spyware?
#:*Is article Spyware going to fall under this WikiProject in the long-term as well?
#Regarding links to sites that ARE the author's (and the site contains code that might be downloaded automatically without the user's permission), is there a standardised way of warning the user? For example: Clicking on this link will take you to a site that might contain malware. Malware can be downloaded to your computer without your knowledge. (or something to that effect)
#Screenshots of adware (or any other malware that is visible). Are there any anti-virus/anti-spyware/anti-malware sites out there that have images that are able to be used? (I'm a bit cloudy on the free use and copyright things - if someone can explain it clearer to me I'm all ears :D). If not, are we going to describe what appears on the screen of an infected computer rather than possibly infecting our own machine trying to get a screenshot?
#Regarding External links (which I've noticed are often marked as advertising), how MANY soloutions should be given? Maybe a See also section linking to Anti-virus#List_of_antivirus_software_and_companies (or maybe Anti-virus#Freeware instead?), Spyware#Remedies_and_prevention, and maybe also a link to :Category:Spyware removal (obviously not putting the article into the category! ;)), and maybe External links to 2 automatic removal tools and 2 manual removal articles?
#:*I'm going to start work on SpyAxe (using a Userpage sandbox at User:TheJC/Malware/Spyaxe). Once I've done that, I'll either carry on with articles in the Spyware category, or create Brontok (computer worm).
#Where are the templates for this project?
#:*Hope this isn't too long :) TheJC TalkContributions 21:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Member 

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 00:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Spyware is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy (Talk) 21:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Spyware]]

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 17:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: * 13 September 2007 - expires 18 September
** SpyHeal (PROD by User:B. Wolterding; "SpywareHeal is a rogue anti-spyware program.") --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletions ([[WP:PROD]]) 

message: Hi guys, Storm botnet is now up for GA review. If you could lend a hand cleaning/expanding etc. it would be great. Thanks! • Lawrence Cohen 15:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Storm botnet]] up for GA review 

message: just a suggestion, why don't we try to put the  template or rather organize the page a bit? Neffyring (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Page Layout? 

message: An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ?  " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - , member of WikiProject Council.  15:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this WikiProject (WikiProject Malware) should be brought under the management of WikiProject Software for the survival of this project.  There is an open discussion on the WikiProject Software talk page.  We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. -- Tyw7, formerly Troop350     (Talk  ●  Contributions) 10:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank You, I will visit both these pages for discussion Sephiroth storm (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A discussion 

message: As of today, WikiProject Malware is a descendant wikiproject of WikiProject: Computing. Articles may use the tag:  
Sephiroth storm (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also created WP 1.0 Assessment category tree for WP:Malware with TinucherianBot --  Tinu Cherian  - 12:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If some body can identify the categories of this project , the articles can be autotagged by TinucherianBot --  Tinu Cherian  - 12:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Forgive my inexperience, What do you mean as far as categories? If you mean the categories at the bottom of the pages, I will include a list of those I can find. Can you help make the project page and talk page more orginized? With the nice flashy stuff like on WP:ComputingSephiroth storm (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Announcement 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Malware 

message: I suggest renaming the Userbox template. The current name 'WikiProject Malware' is the one that should be used for the main template. The userbox should be named 'WikiProject Malware/Userbox', just like Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Userbox --DanielPharos (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind, however, I'm not familiar with making or editing userboxes. If you can do so, please do and provide us with the new tag. Sephiroth storm (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, done. I've also made a request to move the Template:MalwareProject to the now 'free' Template:WikiProject Malware. --DanielPharos (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox template needs to be renamed 

message: I just found a possibly unnotable article: Talk:Stand alone viruses Someone with full knowledge of things should take a closer look at it. --DanielPharos (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, this article seems completly unnessesary, i'm nominating it for Speedy Deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sephiroth storm (talk • contribs) 19:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks --DanielPharos (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

text: NP. looks like its been taken care of. Sephiroth storm (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly non-notable article 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but  is currently under . Aren't boot viruses fundamentally more or less platform independant? I mean, they hijack the boot sector; that doesn't necessarily mean that DOS must be installed on that system. (Even better, there are some Windows boot viruses named in there: Crazy Boot (computer virus) for example.) Also, if that's changed, that would make the  and  the same: the latter should be merged into the former. --DanielPharos (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boot viruses don't need DOS 

message: There appears to be a naming-issue with the Unassessed category: Template:WikiProject Malware. It seems the current name of the category includes the word 'Class', and the template doesn't like that. I'm not sure how to proceed to rectify this... --DanielPharos (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am familiar with the class and importance tags on the template, but im not sure if the class is showing on the templates. Sephiroth storm (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with quality/importance category 

message: I just found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Onlinestability.com+Trojan&fulltext=Search  I can't open the article; a 500-internal server error pops up. It's probably due to a bad URL (the dot com in the article name). Can somebody take a look at this, or poke an admin to fix this? --DanielPharos (talk) 13:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it suddenly corrected itself... --DanielPharos (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unaccessable article 

message: I made a new icon; please tell me if you like it. (I probably should have opened a discussion about this first. Damn spur-of-the-moments!) --DanielPharos (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is it? Sephiroth storm (talk) 18:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here: :Image:Malware logo.png. It's the one used in the templates. --DanielPharos (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New icon 

message: Just wondering why the project specifically calls for article titles to be disambiguated when there is no other article with which our readers could get confused.  Why Sobig (computer worm) instead of just "Sobig"?  Sobig just redirects there anyway, so why not have the article there?  Disambiguation is generally only to be used when there is a conflict in article titles, which doesn't seem to be the case with some of our virus and worm articles, yet they are disambiguated anyway.  Is there any compelling rationale not to move these articles over the un-disambiguated redirects?  Ford MF (talk) 17:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This policy was in place when I came on board, unless there is a real need for a change, I see little need for a change, it could indeed prevent future problems, if there becomes anouther article that needs to be Sobig whatever. Sephiroth storm (talk) 19:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see "it was like this when I got here" as being a particularly strong rationale to ignore our style guidelines.  Ford MF (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary disambiguations

message: Hello All,
I don't know if anyone has a problem with this .. but I'd like to 'revive' this project, as it seems to be dead. If anyone has any objections, please feel free to make them clear to me while I try to update the WikiProject page, and the various articles underneath our project.
Please help out where you can .. malware is a very important topic and field within computing!
Kind Regards, blurpeace (talk - contributions) 01:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Try at a Revive 

message: As it seems, this Project Page is a little drab, and could use a little sprucing up.
I have decided to start recreating the page on the Sandbox page (that I have also started). You will see my development there if you are interested.
Kind Regards, blurpeace (talk - contributions) 23:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My First Step 

message: In case you've missed it so far, I'd like to note that there's discussion of the future of both WikiProjects at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer and Information Security task force. --h2g2bob (talk) 01:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The future of WikiProject Malware and the Computer and Information Security Task force 

message: I have recently nominated the article Jeefo (computer virus) for deletion.  If anyone wants to contribute to the discussion, please do so.  The discussion can be found here :.  Thanks for reading.  Terrakyte (talk) 03:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD nomination of Jeefo (computer virus) 

message: Hello everyone.
I'm interested in malware and removal techniques and I was in a malware removal training program in a reputable security forum (I didn't make it, though). How do I join this WikiProject?
Securityadvisor - Talk | Contribs 02:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to Join 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: FYI. 14:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Computer virus AfD: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Win32_Swizzor]] 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: This is a notice about :Category:Malware articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 20:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    10:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    10:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool