Talk:Timeline of architectural styles

message: We've expanded the timeline so much I beginning to think we should split the table into 100 year periods from the Baroque onwards. - the mdoern list is so long it's quite difficult to read of the years now. --Mcginnly | Natter 18:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further splits

message: I think we need to define the "Western" and the other future timelines. 'Western' is rather problematic because of the americas. North and south American architecture is a part of the western tradition generally, but the pre-columbian stuff clearly isn't. So do we have a Timeline of architectural styles (pre-columbian Americas) and then add all of the various developments since then, to the 'western' timeline? I think this is a bit messy.
Another solution might be to rename the timelines and simply divide the globe into the current continents listed in the Architecture of the world. Like this:-
*Timeline of architectural styles (European)
*Timeline of architectural styles (Asian)
*Timeline of architectural styles (North America)
*Timeline of architectural styles (South America)
*Timeline of architectural styles (Oceania)
This might work better because one could look at the timeline of the Americas and then see the influence and blending (or not) of post-columbian styles. We can be flexible as to what we include and don't include - especially in the complex interactions between the middle east, europe, north africa and asia. - depending on the consequent influence of each style. --Mcginnly | Natter 13:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other timelines

message: I have added Mudéjar architecture. I find technical problems in adding styles to the table: I don´t know how to edit to do what I want. Could anybody change Mudéjar to be over the Normand style? For its length I think it will be more correct. Other problem for me is the conventions about chronology: Do we prefer an exact date or a decade? First Mudéjar construction is said to be San Tirso monastery in Sahagún, started c. 1126. Last constructions in Mudéjar style were done in the beginning of the 17th century, even after the expulsion of Moriscos in 1610, but the Style had lost its popularity a decade before. How can we put this nuances in a table?--Garcilaso 10:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looked fine to me - I put Mudejar above Norman in the code which makes it display above norman in the table - we can't be too precise about dates, arch history unfortunately isn't that precise. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mudéjar]]

message: why is this page being so destroyed by random characters through the timeline definition code? i already fixed a case of "MUNTER!" being spread through the code ruining it, and now there are random characters right through the first timeline causing it not to render. does someone really hate the timeline of architectural styles? maybe since architectural history is pretty stable in terms of change, we lock this page after it's fixed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.197.19 (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  defaced 

message: Hi, I just tried to edit the timelines but was not successfull.. could you please add these two styles in the timeline?
at:1925 text:"Rondo Cubism" #1925-1938 Czechoslovakia
at:1910 text:"Cubism" #1910-1925 Czechoslovakia
Thanks!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.42.146.216 (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  help 

message: I propose merging the 3 separate lists (Timeline of architectural styles 1900–present, Timeline of architectural styles 1000–present, Timeline of architectural styles 6000 BC–present), that have not been developed much in 6 years, back into this list. Partially to allow centralised watchlisting, development, and discussion; partially to give readers less articles to find and click-through; and partially to prevent content-drift (where one timeline gets updated, but the other doesn't). Thoughts? Thanks. –Quiddity (talk) 16:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Placing 3 tables in one single article is a good idea.--Rochelimit (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Timeline of architectural styles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605024443/http://www.voorthuis.net/timelines.htm to http://www.voorthuis.net/timelines.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Art Nouveau is not on timeline and Art Deco is, which boggles the mind since Art Nouveau had heavy influence on Art Deco. Also early Art Deco appears before WW1 yet is set on timeline like it appears in late 1920s which is wrong.Also Egyptian revival is actual part of Art Deco, not style on its own (according to timeline provided, there is earlier 19th century egyptian revival which you will get when you  search that page on Wiki which will only lead to greater confusion) Article needs urgent correction, chances are those are not only mistakes in this timeline.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.19.108.39 (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art Nouveau and Art Deco