Talk:Rome: Total Realism

message: Btw, the page needs a new political map, as the current is from the stone-age 5.3
Yep, I agree. This one is much better. http://lazarus.elte.hu/~hzsolt/terkep/rtw/rtw_political_trm60.png
:What about this one? http://lazarus.elte.hu/~hzsolt/terkep/rtw/political_rtr70.png It's unofficial but still illustrates the vastly expanded scope of the upcoming RTR VII  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.85.248.133 (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Political map 

message: Can some one tell me which mod is better Europa Barbarorum or Rome total realism???
:Don't download either of them, it is totally unprofessional how they handle installation techniques, they don't warn you about any data loss, they are vague about some program deleting certain files. If you don't understand what they are really saying you are scr*wed. They tell you to simply make a copy of the Data file in your Rome: Total War file, AFTER you have installed the mod. How immature is that? I strongly advice you never to download any of those mods and never ever never install them. Mallerd 22:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: Are there any marius reforms in the game i just passed 103BC surly they should have come in around 106 or 107???
I WANT THE COOL LEGIONS lol
King Alaric  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.81.182 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to have an Imperial Palace in two cities in Italy (Rome+other) Kranyak (talk) 21:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Marius Reforms

message: I added this little part and also updated the RTR PE version as well. Xelnanga 04:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: User Mods

message: I think that this article does conform to the standard of notability required for Wikipedia.
I have found several reviews (mostly of the old RTR 6.0 version) online.
Based on these, I feel that the notability warning should be removed. 
I am unsure if these would be appropriate for the external links section or not.
I also feel that the article focuses on a single version of the mod rather than the project as a whole. I think that future edits of this page should take this into account.
--Ptolomy of Epirus (talk) 23:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have found websites establishing notability, please include them in the article and help to clean this page up.  There are many gaming review sites that have talked about RTR but nobody has bothered to challenge the notability tag.  Someone needs to take the time to do some work on this page. Ace blazer (talk) 16:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and focus 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rome: Total Realism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081021114858/http://pcgamingcenter.ugo.com/?cur=rome-total-war-game-mod to http://pcgamingcenter.ugo.com/?cur=rome-total-war-game-mod
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Most of the content in the article was not sourced and the only plausible explanation for much of it was WP:OR criticism by game users which are certainly not proper reliable sources for the matter. The excruciating details of the additions made by the mod are also not particularly important from the perspective of anyone but users of the mod; for most readers a short and simple summary is more than enough and it fits better with typical content guidelines (for another example of this, see the main article on Rome: Total War; or the very good article on another mod for the same game, Europa Barbarorum). If any new content is to be added; it first and foremost needs proper sources (not just opinions from users of the game). A good start would be for someone to track down the reviews from the various mentioned sources and add that information. 107.190.33.254 (talk) 21:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the recent edits 

message: The link at the bottom ( http://www.rometotalrealism.org/ ) leads to some blog about video games that does not contain anything about the mod. I assume that the domain owners have changed. 
I found https://www.moddb.com/mods/rome-total-realism as an alternative, but as I am not sure whether this is official or not, I did not edit the article.
Another promising link would be the twcenter forum entry https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?559467-Rome-Total-Realism-Platinum-Edition-v2-0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.40.174 (talk) 14:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link