lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quatuor Coronati Lodge

message: We need to cite an independent source or two (something other than the QCCC website) to establish notability... I will check to see if it is discussed in Hodapp's "for Dummies" book or Morris's "Idiot's guide"... but we should also look for other sources that are even better. Blueboar (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent source needed
Talk:Apple (1910s automobile)

message: I did a little research, but was not able to find anything on this company. Due to its brief life, this isn't surprising. Could the company possibly be related to Vincent G. Apple (1874-1932)? He was a Dayton area inventor who received patents on several automobile and aircraft related electrical parts.
I added the unreferenced tag to this page. Even the David Burgess Wise "Encyclopedia of Automobiles" does not mention this company (it lists even the smallest of defunct auto companies). It could be that it was so small and so short lasting that there is just not much written about it. Worse case senerio, the page is a hoax. If a hoax, the page should be removed, otherwise, it needs to reference sources.HornColumbia 17:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Edit Warring is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, and as such, I would like to resolve this issue before undoing any more edits. The user Special:Contributions/2602:306:B8A5:26B0:D8BB:C160:6001:B63B is arguing that the reason the company failed is because the company lacked Steve Jobs' business acumen. It is my understanding that the company Apple and the automobile company in question have no affiliation. To equate, this is like me going on the Vietnam War article, and adding that good Americans suffered so many casualties because America lacked a good military leader like Genghis Khan. It doesn't make any sense because they have nothing to do with each other, and while having Genghis Khan as a general might have helped, it's irrelevant. Similarly, having Steve Jobs' business acumen might have helped, but it's irrelevant. k_scheik (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverting additions like this is not considered edit warring. Additions of inane trollish pov such as this is vandalism and exempt from the 3rr policy. However,an essay, WP:DENY, is on point here. If someone who is obviously trolling, or so clueless as to think this a helpful addition, is best ignored. John from Idegon (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Warring 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 11:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Apple (automobile) →  – Dab from Apple car project * Pppery * it has begun... 14:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Automobiles has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 17:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Ohio and WikiProject United States have been notified of this discussion. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 April 2024
Talk:Exposed (American game show)

message: Doesn't the disclaimer at the end of each episode kind of negate the whole show? I mean basically they're just saying that the lie detector may or may not be effective but it probably isn't... --DancexwithxmexXx 14:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disclaimer

message: You can tell that the show is scripted with (bad) actors. Should be more mention of it.
:Seems to be a lot of recurring handcuffs, and similarly "risque" objects... 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fake
Talk:Water fight

message: Thread related to this page at the iSoaker Forums can be found here. — Ultor_Solis • T 16:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: :When did squirt guns begin being used? There is a mention of one in a historical fiction book based in the 1880's in the United States. Is there any historical evidence that they existed then? - MOVED FROM ARTICLE PAGE by ABVS1936 15:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous Information

message: opening line of any wikipedia article.  "It is unknown precisely just when humans began splashing their friends with water." Magmagoblin2 (talk) 13:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simply the best 

message: I have added a section about Wet Monday, and I am really surprised it wasn't here already. It is massively celebrated in Poland and some girls choose not to leave their houses on that day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.160.73.156 (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wet monday 
Talk:List of cities and towns in Colombia

message: What is the point of the first column? 伟思礼 (talk) 22:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number?
Talk:2007 Texas Rangers season

message: There is an infobox available for team season articles  --Borgarde 08:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox available 
Talk:List of universities in Colombia

message: Dear contributors: I am fairly disappointed in how this page is turning into a show off. Particularly, I am concerned in the addition of unreferenced material, copyrighted photographs, and the inclusion of Higher Education Institutions that are not Universities - As Colombia has a three tiered Higher Education System, three different pages (or one that specifies the different categories) are needed. An agreement on the name of the institutions must be reached. I suggest to use the Spanish name, as it is the Legal name of the institution. I suggest that people should avoid into edit wars if changes in the page are made in order to adhere to an scholarly style, or if the changes are challenged, please comment in this page.
Regards Andremun (talk) 01:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List structure 
Talk:Bend Or

message: A photo of Bend Or, showing his Bend-Or spots, would be most helpful. --Una Smith (talk) 14:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bend Or spots

message: There were well-publicised rumours that "Bend Or" had been mixed up with another colt called "Tadcaster" (out of Clemence) and that the colt who won the Derby was actually the latter. See  Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also a new report  that found that mitochondrial DNA from Bend Or's skeleton is compatible with DNA of Family 2 (Tadcaster's dam). So Bend Or in all likely hood was Tadcaster. Don't know if we can re-write history here. Froggerlaura ribbit 00:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Hi, both of the colts were by Doncaster don't forget, so the sire-line remains unaltered. The immediate pedigree of Tadcaster's dam is noted in the article. By the time we get to Phalaris the pedigree would only be different by 1/32 and at the 5th generation. Edwarddutton (talk) 21:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maternity issues
Talk:Symphonic music in Iran

message: Hmmm... this project needs some serious work, as about 75% of the people it has links to do not yet have a wikipedia page. Elem3nt 16:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed up the grammar, and reworded some of it to clarify the statement in the sentence ("Some critics reject...").  I wish I could help with the people, but, you know, I don't know any of them.--Charibdis 08:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Buchach

message: Parts of this article seem to violate copyright. The same content is in: http://www.ibiblio.org/yiddish/Places/Buczacz/bucz-tc.htm --Dborsuk 17:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 

message: I appreciate that Ukraine romanizes it as Buchach, but I think it still requires a pronunciation. "ch" as in church or as in Bach?  I know lots of cases where ch romanized Ukrainian ч gets mispronounced. --142.163.194.97 (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pronunciation as in church (letter ч), from Ukrainian. Bach pronunciation ch from Deutsch (in Ukrainian Бах). --Микола Василечко (talk) 04:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation in English 

message: More sources are needed in the WWII part of the History section. Palnatoke (talk) 09:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII sources, please
Talk:Philosophy/Workshop

message: This page is a guided discussion, to try and pull together various additional insights for the Philosophy article.
As a guided discussion, it varies slightly from the talk page. Rather than long threaded discussion, the principle on this page is short summary comments, and rather than interminable debate the rule here should aim to be that different people simply state their view, rather than discuss others views. When the views are stated, we then look to see where they agree, where they differ, and what's learned together.
The aim here will be to ask questions that clarify the article and views on it, so that a degree of improved communication can happen. As such it's likely to be a mix of questions about philosophy, and questions about editorial activity. Some of these will be open questions, others may well be "here's my impression, what does or doesn't work about it as others see it" (ie, attempts to test my impressions of the article structure and check if there are errors)
I have no idea what will happen, but I expect many questions and relatively short, easy to work with, answers. Longer answers may be refactored to help the debate be productive. The talk page is still as it was for main discussion, this page is more to provide a way for me to gain quick insight into questions that seem important to the article, and to allow consensus on various points to be developed with more ease. FT2 (Talk | email) 17:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: * (q)
There's a concern about having a balanced presentation; i.e., specifically the debate over the
analytic framework vs continental. I don't know how to frame the question, but maybe someone could pose the question here, if that would seem proper. Richiar 09:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A truly balanced presentation is desirable, as far as I am concerned.  From reviewing past discussions on the philosophy page, I think the wheel gets stuck in the mud when this becomes a demand that every statement - even and especially introductory statements - be tailored to be consistent with what Derrida and/or Deleuze and/or Foucault [insert your own continental heavyweight] would say about the topic.  One simply cannot, in practical terms, proceed in that manner - not least because there are sharp disagreements between so-called "continentals", but because they (like analytic philosophers) hold different views at different times.  I suggest that in the general parts of the article - the introduction for instance - one must search for sufficiently general terms which can capture the views of at least most philosophers.  Strong disagreement, if notable, can be cited in the meat of the article.  KD Tries Again 15:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed questions
Talk:Cauca Department

message: There was a section added to this article regarding the armed conflict in Cauca, and that section has been deleted. Similar sections have been removed from a number of other Colombian department articles. There is a discussion concerning these removals at Talk:Valle del Cauca department#Armed conflict. -- Irn (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armed conflict 
Talk:AMD K6-2

message: I finally retired my K6-2 233 machine in 2007. It was still running strong until a power surge fried the video section of the motherboard. Bobroberts248 (talk) 06:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Chocó Department

message: There was a section added to this article regarding the armed conflict in Chocó, and that section has been deleted. Similar sections have been removed from a number of other Colombian department articles. There is a discussion concerning these removals at Talk:Valle del Cauca department#Armed conflict. -- Irn (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armed conflict 
Talk:Cundinamarca Department

message: The Spanish name is Departamento de Cundinamarca, and the page starts with the English equivalent of Cundinamarca Department. So why is the page at Cundinamarca department and not Cundinamarca Department ? The page was moved last year - but I believe that was wrong the D should be capital as part of a proper name. -- Beardo (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 
Talk:Eastbourne/Peer Review 20070120

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 4 miles, use 4 miles, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 4 miles.[?]
*Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.[?]
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
**arguably
**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Avoid using contractions like: don't.
*Please provide citations for all of the s.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, MortimerCat 22:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Huila Department

message: There was a section added to this article regarding the armed conflict in Huila, and that section has been deleted. Similar sections have been removed from a number of other Colombian department articles. There is a discussion concerning these removals at Talk:Valle del Cauca department#Armed conflict. -- Irn (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  armed conflict 
Category talk:Populated places

message: I removed the invented definition for 'settlement' on the category page. It was original research, unsupported by any dictionary. -- Donald Albury 17:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition I have restored is supported by reliable published sources. The previous definition was not sourced at all, and appears to be original research, and thus not allowed in Wikipedia. This case is independent of any discussion at CfD, as a CfD consensus cannot override the verification and original research policies. -- Donald Albury 18:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: The agreed definition of settlements precludes such official populated areas as villages and larger. Also smaller districts and areas of urban areas such as suburbs or boroughs would not come under the scope of settlements. However, refuge and transient camps would come under settlements. SilkTork 23:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category sorting 

message: Calling this 'category sorting' is a misuse of the term.  It is a bad faith effort to get around the Cfd decisions.  Hmains 05:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories
Template talk:Celtic F.C.

message: Could we have it a less bright green? --Guinnog 17:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse my lack of knowledge of HTML colours, I was thinking it was a bit...fluorescent. Archibald99 17:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Better? Archibald99 17:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Better. Is mine better still or less good? Change it back if you want, but the original lime green was hard on the eye. Thanks for your good work by the way. --Guinnog 17:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it again, same colour as the home kit template on the Celtic F.C. article. Cheers. Archibald99 17:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nariño Department

message: The article says it's in western Colombia, but isn't it in the southwestern corner of Colombia? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Western or southwestern?
Talk:Lefetamine

message: Changed the legality to Schedule IV for the US. Not sure about other countries, but it is listed on the DEA's list of scheduled drugs. Also the the un-IUPAC name the DEA uses as a synonym. Revaaron (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Legality

message: to what the refs say and to provide verifiable source links. You guys are quite a bit too optimistic and sensational, comparing that to morphine and methylphenidate. It is C IV for a reason, that means that the racemate has half of the analgetic effect of codeine according to refs, plus some stimulant effect. Also the analog mentioned has NO neurotoxic effect. You guys seem to have the reading understanding of healthy policemen.
70.137.142.102 (talk) 02:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: edited article
Talk:Quindío Department

message: The article says, "There are in this department about ". This is obviously a direct translation of a Spanish text, because it is not well written English. It contains an elementary formatting error. In the United States 1.845 is less than two, while 1,825 is nearly two thousand. The conversion to 1 sq mi is also an obvious indication that the author is not a native English speaker. One square mile is a tiny amount of land. You can walk around the outside of a square mile in less than an hour. I note that 1845 is the number of square kilometers in the department. That is 705 square miles. I believe that he entire department is mountainous, and covered with tropical rain forest. I am going to correct this to my best guess. Could someone who knows correct it? Nick Beeson (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Size 
Talk:Billy Ayre

message: *Well written: 
**Lead needs to be heavily expanded per WP:LEAD.
**Persondata needs to be added. Done. - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 19:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Talk:Chuchuna

message: i agree, it is cast into doubt because there has been no follow up stories. but since the bbc article named a person and an organization, maybe someone who knows russian can try to search for a contact and give a phone call and maybe get some final answer. "Yuriy Malofeyev, vice-president of the Russian association of veterinary anatomists" is what the bbc article said, unfortunately i cant find an association by this name by searching for it in english.-(71.202.181.87 (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The foot doesn't even look like a primate's foot at all, it looks like a bear's. It even has claws, which AFAIK no primate does. And the X-ray looks exactly like the skeleton of a bear foot. The article almost seems cut off after it mentions the veterinarians--I wonder what the vets really had to say about it? 68.205.68.57 (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Since there currently are no sources in the article, adding a link to the aforementioned BBC article here for reference: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3175926.stm  —PaleoNeonate – 01:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: My impression is that this would only be enough for a mention at the Yeti article, to which this name Chuchuna could also redirect; it may even be undue for the Yeti article...  I will not personally contest the current proposed deletion for this.  —PaleoNeonate – 01:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that it's been contested by another editor anyway, I assumed that the blue translation tag was the prod one.  —PaleoNeonate – 02:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

text:  (from the edit summary: "contest WP:PROD deletion - the Russian Wikipedia article cites at least one reliable source, and more can be found by searching in Cyrillic") Would it be possible to add one or more of those sources that you consider reliable at the bottom of the article in a bibliography?  Many thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 02:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: doubt

message: I attempted a machine translation and copy edit of :ru:Chuchuna, the result is User:EricR/Chuchuna. I have doubts about merging this in to the article:
*Obviously it would be much better for a Russian speaker to make the translation.
*чучуны (chuchuny) and мюлены (myuleny) are russianized transcription of Yakut. The english article should stick to latinized Yakut names. The linguistic aspects are important and it's easy to make errors with everything in Russian.
*The paragraph for Gurvich is a particularly bad translation, and that's the most important source.
*мюлен (mulen)/мулуөн (muluön) a Yakut "wild man" and chuchunaa (outcast Chukchi) are related and the sources make a connection, but i don't think the "wild man" archetype is presented very well in the article. mulen is given as just another name for Chuchuna.
Better to start from scratch i think, rather than rely on the translation.—eric 16:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation or build from scratch?