lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Season's Greetings (play)

message: Sorry, but this depiction of Season's Greetings was obviously written by someone who has never actually performed in the play.  It is not about the loss of passion in marraige but about the struggles of individuals faced by this dilemma to find a way, any way, to communicate with each other about it.  It is not about the sadness inherent in a life defined by mediocrity, but about each character's continual attempts to overcome their fears of personal mediocrity, through the expression of their own passions; in Bernard's case, it is encapsulated by the (not at all dismal to him) puppet show he does every year for the kids.  And incidently, it is the kids who are never seen, not the puppet show itself as implied by the article writer's sloppy prose.
Most importantly, this is a black comedy about people trying to meet the overwhelming expectations they've set up for that most trecherous time of year, Christmas.....and what we discover by play's end is that just as in life, some of the character's learn and grow, and others seem only too content not to.  It is an honest look at what often really happens over the holidays, is hugely funny as a result, and when well directed and played carries the resonance of Chekhov's best work.
And it is the perfect antidote to yet another production of A Christmas Carol!
: I have removed three sentences expressing disputed opinions about the play. In general, opinions about plays or anything should be either 1) something that no-one would reasonably dispute, or 2) something what was written in reliable sources (in which case you should be clear who said it). Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

message: * feel free to sign your comments and edit the article to be more accurate or complete.  Thanks!  --Mdukas (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  comments, questions, suggestions
Talk:QR code

message: This page has a link to this standard https://www.iso.org/standard/77404.html for rMQR barcode which looks to be a rectangular QR code like IQR so it might be the same thing...
Does that mean that this barcode is now actually free to implement and use? If so then this statement needs to be adjusted
> IQR Codes have not yet been given an ISO/IEC specification, and only proprietary Denso Wave products can create or read IQR codes.
--Mofosyne (talk) 02:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO/IEC 23941:2022 Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Rectangular Micro QR Code (rMQR) bar code symbology specification =

message: It seemed to be a stretch to call JAB code a variant, so I moved the whole section to its own page. ~ MD Otley (talk) 01:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  JAB code 

message: I may misunderstand but the image "QR Format Information.svg" appears to show the wrong codes for the mask patterns. The ISO IEC 18004 2015 Standard (the first I managed to find) has them in an entirely different order. MatthewGAllan (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect codes for the masks
Talk:Field service management

message: Ideas:
* Redirect from Mobile Resource Management ? -- Robocoder (t|c) 05:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed the following reference because it isn't a public document: 
Please provide a suitable reference if you know one. wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 11:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References please
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Normal Bob Smith

message: Bob encourages debate on a wide range of theological issues--and it's possible to read his page and solidify or modify your religious beliefs. Shameless self-promoter? On what scale? He put up his own page, lets people come to  him with their emails, and posts them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.12.215 (talk • contribs) 03:02, September 2, 2006
More than a quarter million email complaints. ref; http://news.christiansunite.com/Religion_News/religion00683.shtml
Other notables:
http://www.bobsmithmovie.com/
http://www.washtimes.com/business/20040322-092410-2758r.htm
http://www.tfp.org/what_we_do/index/blasphemy_dress_up_jesus.htm
http://www.cst-phl.com/040408/sixth.html
http://www.americanatheist.org/conv29/
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/076416.htm
-anon 71.247.93.137 05:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:CIA triad

message: Does anyone know the origins of the C-I-A model?  Who originally identified these three characteristics of information as being of key importance from the perspective of securing information?  Mike 05:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I'd like a reference to the Triad. My guess is a DoD reference that got refined and boiled down. Probably started in the Orange Book Luis F. Gonzalez 16:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the CIA Triad 

message: Someone has posted some PDFs of a lot of the early MITRE/DoD research (Bell-Lapadula, Clark, etc)  here.  The earliest mention  I can find to the concepts of confidentiality, integrity, and availability grouped together is in Clark87.None of the Bell-La Padula documents I read (published 1973, 1975 and 1976) seem to be aware of the C-I-A Triad (they were mostly interested in confidentiality and access control). Landwehr's Formal Models of Computer Security (1981) doesn't seem to group C-I-A together, either.   Clark-Wilson was a survey document, but it's conceivable that this was the first time C-I-A were grouped together, in that order and given the kind of prominence the triad is often given today.  I have no evidence that this is the first "modern use" of the triad, but at least it confirms that the concept goes back to 1987. 
If someone has access to the ACM or IEEE online libraries, it might not be hard to find earlier references.  I let my ACM and IEEE memberships expire, but maybe one of these days I'll search the abstracts. 
It's an interesting contrast between the way Clark-Wilson mention C-I-A (as the most often cited goals) versus  the way the C-I-A Triad is often mentioned today --- as the fundamental goals of information security (for example, see the definition of "computer security" in the American National Information Assurance (IA) Glossary).
-- Mike -- 08:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention from 1987 

message: After reading more of Clark-Wilson 1987, I'm leaning more to the belief that the C-I-A Triad originated with this document.  The paper is partially a critique of the DoD/Orange Book thinking:  that security==confidentiality.   C-W note that DoD have well-developed models, methods and policies for protecting secrets, but in the commercial world, data integrity is a huge security concern and  Orange Book thinking is inadequate for dealing with this class of security problems.  
Anyway, I've only read half the paper at this point.  But it looks like part of intent of this paper is to promote a "new" way of thinking about information security.
-- Mike -- 08:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clark-Wilson 

message: This divides IA into three sub-topics.  Does that constitute a model? 
::I don't think it is widely accepted or a model.  Furthermore, it is not much more than three of the many security topics.  I think it should be considered for removal.    John 01:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a Model?
Talk:James D. Meindl

message: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 21#Category:Missing middle or first names, :Category:Missing middle or first names has been added to this talk page.—DomBot / ChiDom talk 09:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add maintenance category 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Hut 8.5 00:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Richmond Night Market

message: Development information is outdated, needs an update. It also contradicts the first paragraph. Both Richmond Night Market and Summer Night Market (latter called Panda Market) are secure in their designated locations. 
Summer Night Market (now Panda link is here: http://pandamarket.ca/)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newb787 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Development information outdated

message: At which time exactly did it take place: At which hour in the evenings did it open and at which hour did it close - did it close e.g. later at night, or at some time (which?) in the mornings? How many hours was it open per night? 
 
That's the information that I'd expect early in the article (in the description) and am missing very much. 
 
- All the legal battles stuff isn't that interesting for readers from all over the planet. 
 
It would be enough to clearly say that it WAS a market (from year ... to year ... ), and not IS any more, in my opinion. 
 
However if all the legal stuff should stay included, it should be updated (as to outcomes), 
 
and especially the penultimate sentence of the article might be rewritten/ edited - maybe parted into two sentences - to be more clearly understandable (and grammatically more correct).  
 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:F61:1640:9446:96F9:7891:5AA5 (talk) 10:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  some issues
Talk:Russet-throated puffbird

message: In para 3, with its large head,...and hooked-tipped bill", if this bird has strange flying characteristics like the Shrike, then it surely sounds like a similar style evolutionary bird. (The old "Form following Function" saying of old.)  The Loggerhead Shrike from here in the Sonoran Desert is a year round resident, and when overflow populations of the Northern Mockingbird, compete, they last throughout wet, desert spells, but cannot compete against the better adapted, lizard-hunter, omnivore, of the Loggerhead.  Anyway this bird sure sounds similar. The loggerheads are often perched, elevated, and dive bomb upon their prey.  So is this puffbird the South American equivalent, in the tropical NW S.Amer. of Colombia/Venezuela?.? .....///....."TheDesertDweller" out in the Sonoran Desert...Mmcannis 05:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think only in the very broad sense that it is a specialist sit-and-wait predator like the shrikes, and several birds of prey, and therefore has typical adaptations. However, the puffbirds are forest, not open country, birds. I suspect that mimids and proper raptors like Laughing Falcons fill more accurately fill the "shrike" ecological niche in SAm. jimfbleak 07:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A question
Talk:Princess Hours

message: Where are your sources? SKS2K6 05:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  I'll edit accordingly. 05:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To whoever's editing the "new" info for S2

message: People keep changing around this article to reflect what they think is correct.  Starting sometime tonight, I will replace all the names with their official transliterations, from the MBC Global website.  Please do not change it, as there will obviously be alternate spellings for the characters.  Also, aren't summary and synopsis basically the same thing? SKS2K6 22:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Please fix the facts on the portion about Goong's airing in the Philippines. Ratings are not true and Goong haven't equaled the success of Full House. On the latest ratings, Goong only acquired 18-24 percents ratings while A Rosy Life's last episode peaked to a whopping 28 percent. Please fix this.
210.1.90.100 12:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have NO IDEA what they are.  That's why all I'm doing is cleaning it up so that it's grammaticaly correct and stuff.  It would be nice if you could find references.  That's why I keep adding fact tags. SKS2K6 18:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Philippine Entry

message: Please do not randomly tag pages as being copy-vio without adequate proof.  The two pages have very little in common, save for the ratings chart (both pages source the same...source, and have the same table) and a few links (which should be fine, as they're the main links for the subject in question).  Second, as they are both wikis, how would you know which page was doing the copying?  The reverse could equally be true.  (I also believe that wikis are public domain, but that may not be the case.)  There is no basis for the deletion of this page.  For My Girl (drama), I understand because the text is blatantly copied.  But here, I see no basis for the copyright violation tag. SKS2K6 07:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS

message: Can we make a different page that has the manhwa plot to it? The manhwa and the series are different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.211.24.175 (talk) 21:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  manhwa 

message: There's a musical soon to debut based on the TV show. I don't have all the info and I don't trust myself to write a decent section for it, so if someone could do that, it'd be awesome.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehlohehlee (talk • contribs) 23:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goong Musical 

message: I propose that The Princess Hours be merged into Princess Hours. I think that the content in the former article can easily be explained in the context of this article. There is simply not enough coverage by WP:V to warrant a separate page, but the subject of the musical is potentially notable. Not to mention the sheer confusion based on the current article titles. MyNameWasTaken (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering how little content there is in the other article, might as well just go ahead and do it. SKS (talk) 22:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Wesselényi conspiracy

message: Because discussion about merger has ended in November 2007 I have asked administrator to delete article Zrinski-Frankopan conspiracy  after which somebody of us will move this article to Magnatenverschwörung and make all redirect links --Rjecina (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No concensus about the move, remember the Britannica reference? I wouldn't mind moving it, but someone pointed out that Magnatenverschwörung doesn't have many English Google results. Squash Racket (talk) 07:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With hope that we all agree I only want that discussion about merger end. After that we will have new discussion about name. I have asked administrator to delete Zrinski-Frankopan conspiracy and nothing else. My comment about new name in this section has been mistake....--Rjecina (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are sure that useful information has been saved from the article, then OK. Also please add WP:CRO if you are a member. Squash Racket (talk) 07:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible to say that ulmost nobody of Croatian users which are 1 year or more on wikipedia are members of WP:CRO .Only active members from this list which are living in Croatia are Thewanderer, Jačov, Timbouctou and administrator Joy. Information about merger has been given on Wikipedia:Croatian Wikipedians' notice board so problem is solved.--Rjecina (talk) 09:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Oh, and by the way, just to forestall a frequent error, if you finally decide to move it all to a third location, please don't do that by copying-and-pasting the contents, only through the move button. If that should be impossible for technical reasons, ask an admin to do it for you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Palace of Poitiers

message: *"Alienor of Aquitaine" strikes me as more than a little affected: I suppose I should have felt  flattered and frightfully well-informed, that I knew immediately who was being referred to... but I didn't feel even the least bit smug, as I was intended to feel I suppose.... --Wetman 07:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Awesom-O

message: According to transcripts :
# Cartman was already rescued after Butters pleaded to the military, though the military still regarded him as a robot having "consciousness".  So in the end he got his identity revealed by Butters but that's not a rescue.
# Butters also invited the movie producers to the tape release.
# The officer telling Cartman "you're a little faggot" is a general.
-- Patrickov 17:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot discussion 

message: Thats a joke rigth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.140.0.154 (talk • contribs) 
:I presume so, it is Matt Stone and Trey Parker we are talking about here. ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look under "Production": "The crew had to go to Hawaii for a friend's wedding, which pushed back the production of this episode." Prezuiwf 17:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What tragic event in hawaii? 

message: Currently in the "References to other South Park episodes", it says: "Butters also donated money overseas in 'Osama Bin Laden Has Farty Pants.'" Is there something in the episode that specifically refers to this? I admit it's been a while since I have seen that episode, and I will correct myself after I had chance to see it again, but unless there is something in "AWESOM-O" that specifically refers to the donation to Afghanistan kids, we should not mention it in the Wikipedia article---as I recall, the whole 4th-grade class had to donate a dollar, and Butters donating a dollar isn't any more significant than, oh, Dog Poo donating a dollar.  novakyu (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just saw the Afghanistan episode again, and it's even worse---in the donation scene, Butters isn't even in the class. So, I deleted the incorrect sentence. novakyu (talk) 12:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butters' previous overseas donation? 

message: The entire cultural refs section seems to be crammed full of assumptions and, for lack of a better phrase, need for citations. Lots42 (talk) 12:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural refs 

message: If we are going to have the picture we have, shouldn't there be a bit about how it came about? It's very odd that Cartman would be asked by Butter's parents, insane as they are, to do that. Lots42 (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Awesom-o comes up with 801 adam sandler movies.
It is mentioned by the military that he has made 800 adam sandler movies and then the next scene has him starting and pitching yet one more.  (adam sandler falls in love with a coconut)
Should be changed in the article.--24.29.234.88 (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  801 Adam Sandler movies
Talk:Dany (comics)

message: Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics), I propose the (assumed uncontroversial) action of moving to a slight name change, bringing article in line with convention and most other similar articles. So unless there are any good arguments against this, I'll do this in a few days.. —MURGH disc. 08:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As creator of this article, I have no problem with this move to a better name (I knew the guideline, but somehow I didn't follow it...) Fram 09:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right then. Moving on into uniform name conventionhood..MURGH disc. 17:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:2006 AFL Grand Final

message: Would these additions be more suitable in a general AFL history or AFL trivia article? -- Chuq 05:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fairhills High School

message: I commented the following out of the article:
Fairhills has competed since 1995 and seen a win in the open division in 1996 and placings of 5th, 2nd twice and 1st in the premier division.  For the past 3 years (2004,2005,2006) the school as seen 3 years of consequitive top 2 placings state wide. They also recieved a national placing of 3rd for their 2005 show 'Hypothesis:2084'.
It's not entirely clear to me what they're competing and placing in, nor what sort of show 'Hypothesis:2084' was.  If anyone can clarify... Shimeru 05:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reinstated it for now.  However, I can't cite the official website -- clicking the 2005 links on the site leads me to a "not found" error page.  I've tagged it as needing a citation for now. Shimeru 07:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

message: This article says a lot about the school's participation in the Rock Eisteddfod but little on how it works as a school. Can someone please add sections that talk about what the school offers, what this SEAL program entails and what makes this school any different educationally from the surrounding schools (and I'm not talking statistics here). What is in the first few paragraphs does not clearly indicate this. - 130.194.76.210 (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  General educational information
Talk:Dean Wooldridge

message: The third paragraph now says "where he worked on the theory of magnetism." In fact, he worked on the theory of magnetic sound recording, as evidenced by the paper
"Signal and Noise Levels in Magnetic Tape Recording", D. E. Wooldridge, AIEE Transactions, Vol 65, pp 343...352 (1946 June),
and in his Oral History Transcript at  http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4981.html , search on the phrase  "magnetic sound recording".
Jay.mck (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From Dean Wooldridge article, 3rd graph, 2nd sentence;
"with Ramo concentrating on investment and general business aspects while Wooldridge led research"
From Ramo article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Ramo, Career, 2nd graph, first sentence;
"with Wooldridge concentrating on investment and general business aspects while Ramo led research"
These two lines contradict one another and I just wanted to inform the leading authors so they may be corrected. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBook (talk • contribs) 00:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A line that both Wooldridge's and Ramo's pages share are in conflict. 

message: W.W Wooldridge was my grandfather he was Vice President of Hughes aircraft company. I am not sure what dates he held VP or when he left the company.  I don't know much about him at all, I was hoping some of you could shed some light on this for me. I don't know who Dean Wooldridge is either, I can't find mention of my grandfather and I dont know if Dean may be related to William (AKA Bill or Wild Bill) Wooldridge or his Son Eric S. Wooldridge (my father) Any information would be greatly appreciated.  
Thank you 
Amber M. Wooldridge 
Foreveramber1010@gmail.com 2601:8C1:8500:C120:ACED:1221:F936:5C0A (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  William W. Wooldridge, VP Hughes Aircraft Co.
Talk:Old Castile

message: Someone had placed the following at the top of the article as a hatnote. It may belong somewhere in Wikipedia, but presumably not there.
:La Merindad de Castilla la Vieja was a small region in the Castilian province of Burgos. Now it is part of the town of Villarcayo de Merindad de Castilla la Vieja.
- Jmabel | Talk 06:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: La Merindad