lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fret buzz

message: I think this article needs to either be deleted or merged with fret.  There are no cited sources, the article is vary sparse, and one of the links is to a business.  Furthermore, there this page is kind of an orphan.  The Fret page is not very long, and this article could easily be shortened to a small paragraph.
What do you think? TooManyTooMuch (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also some inappropriate how-to language. Merge seems appropriate for the parts of this page that are encyclopedic and can be reliably sourced. I just removed the commercial link. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 02:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Carlos Pizarro Leongómez

message: More than a stub. If you want to expand further, see if you can find out and write why he joined the guerillas, how did he rise to leadership, what did he do before joining, where and when was he born, etc. What platform did he run on in the election? Could use a photo. Also, it puzzled me a bit when you sometimes call him Carlos Pizarro Leongomez, sometimes Carlos Pizarro, sometimes just Pizarro. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, I switched up to try and not sound redundant. I am still trying to understand when there is a middle name, or a extended last name in Latin American use. I will take your advice for the above and thank you for reviewing. --SevenOfDiamonds 17:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's really no rule as far as I can tell...it either comes with the territory or with usage alone, so to speak. In this case, he's usually known by his (father's) last name, Pizarro. Juancarlos2004 20:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Stereolab discography

message: Wow that took a lot of work. Please be kind if I've done anything manifestly stupid. - Merzbow 06:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finished, I think 

message: You left out Crumb Duck, the split EP they did with Nurse with Wound in 1996. I'd add it in, but I'm too stupid to know which section you would put that in. EP? Rarity? Murderbike 21:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, yeah, I just noticed it even has it's own article at Crumb Duck. Murderbike 21:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already there in the EPs section. - Merzbow 22:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey dummy;) 

message: I don't agree with the classification of some of the releases.
Surely Space Age Batchelor Pad Music, and "First of the Microbe Hunters are short Studio Albums (mini-Albums?), not EPs.  At 28'18 and 39'47 respectively, these would be full albums by the standards of many bands.
I'd also argue that "Amorphous Body Study Centre" were also an Album if it hadn't been re-produced within Aluminium Tunes.
As for "Fab Four Suture", surely this is an album (not a compilation) that just happened to be pre-released as six 7" singles?
Basically, I don't think that these four works should be "downgraded" from "proper studio albums" just because of their length and/or their method of release.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.134.168 (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a tricky issue. If you want, we can rename that top section from "Studio Albums to "Main Albums" and just go by how Allmusic.com classifies Stereolab's albums (see here). Sound good? - Merzbow (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I think there's value in separating the two in that EPs and albums by notable bands generally are allowed their own articles by default, but singles aren't. We have to make a choice about what source to follow here regarding what is an EP and what is a single. Stereolab's own site classifies a bunch of releases as EPs that AllMusic doesn't. Right now the list is based more on the band's own classification of their releases. - Merzbow (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums vs. Compilations vs. EPs 

message: This Too Pure compilation: Too Pure - The Peel Sessions,  seems to have been left off, but I'm not entirely sure where to put it.Tony Corsini (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I deliberately left off compilations that contained less than a majority of Stereolab songs, because I imagine there are dozens of them and they would not be of as much interest. If you want to include them, I would suggest this: Renaming the existing "Compilations" table to "Compilations (Stereolab)". Create a new table called "Compilations (Other)". Place all compilations not primarily of Stereolab material into the new table. - Merzbow (talk) 16:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Left off
Talk:Ridgeley, West Virginia

message: The date of the battle is not 1955 - I assume it's likely 1755  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbeorn (talk • contribs) 12:10, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Year in Header 
Talk:Marcia Davenport

message: This says she died 15 January.
However, this says she died "Tuesday".  The report was published on 20 January, 1996, a Saturday.  The previous Tuesday was 16 January, not 15 January.
This also says 16 January, as do this and this.  The weight of evidence is for the 16th January, so I've changed the article accordingly.  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: I would like to see some more information in this article. 
Having read MD's autobiography I am puzzled by the lack of any mention of her daughter Patricia, whose name is not even mentioned and seems entirely absent from Marcia's life. Was she raised by relatives? Very curious. 148.68.10.217 (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patricia Delmas Clarke
Talk:Lynette Scavo

message: I have noticed that in the latest episode there is another little girl among the Scavo children. Who is she and when did she pop up? I cannot seem to find it in previous episodes.Joneboi 06:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New daughter?

message: In the introducing character description:
"She drives a Nissan Maxima for the show."
Product placement in Wikipedia???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.30.83 (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  She drives a... 

message: I don't think "Wingfield" is Lynette's maiden name. In Season One, Episode 1-20, "Fear No More", Lynette's maiden name is given as "Lindquist", when describing in flashback how Tom met a "rising young executive". This is stronger evidence than the inference that as Polly Bergen has been cast as "Stella Wingfield", the surname must have also been originally shared by her daughter. --Pob iii 09:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all - speculation is not for Wikipedia, secondly it's been stated that Stella remarried - Wingfield could easily be the last name of her second husband, Lynette's stepdad, while Lindquist was the last name of Stella's first husband - Lynette's father - which would make Lindquist Lynette's maiden name. Pjär80 19:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, why does it sound you're telling me off when you've just agreed with what I've said? --Pob iii 20:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lynette Scavo (née Wingfield) 

message: I checked on google, and it transpires that those suspiciously chatty season summaries are substantially sourced from imdb, with very large word-for-word correspondences.  I've removed them. --TS 04:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Season summaries

message: I think she is not 43...
In the last episode (5.17), she says she is 43, but when Tom says he is 2 years younger than her (i think he is 45), she says it doesn't matter.
And it makes no sense. It has been 9 years since the show began, and she was around 40. 77.54.110.88 (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In "Kids Ain't Like Everybody Else" Lynette says that Tom is 45. Then she should be 47. Edenc1 • Talk 18:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old is she? 

message: Lynette must be 52 because in Season 1, Tom states that heis 41 so in season 5, he is 50. Tom says that Lynette is 2 years older than him,so she is 52  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Princessbabyblue (talk • contribs) 12:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, in "Kids Ain't Like Everybody Else" Lynette says that Tom is 45. She is 47. Edenc1 • Talk 22:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lynettes Age 

message: It says that in Series 6 she gives birth to twins named Patricia and Paulina - is this true? or is it just speculation, there is not a source so I recommend it be removed, anyone else?--°wɧoɳɪvɛʀsɜ 10:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In episode 6x11 they decided that he (miscarried boy) was supposed to be "Patrick". In episode 6x16 Lynette decide that girl will be "Polly". How did you watch the show? Michu1945 (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 6/Birth of twins?
Talk:Glenridge, St. Catharines

message: Why two almost identical photos? If someone living nearby, or with knowledge of the area, and knows how to post in Wikipedia wants to advise me, I'm willing to take some photos and post them. Also, please stop the vandalism of this article.CWPappas 06:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos and Vandalism 

message: The area south of the tracks was already mostly in place by 1970, though the apartment highrises between the tracks and Glen Morris Dr. might not have come until the 70s [personal recollection].  I don't know when the area was in fact built up, though, so I've just deleted the incorrect information, rather than attempting to fix it.  (I'd guess the correct dates are 50s to early 60s, but can't say that with nearly enough confidence to write it in the article.) Erics (talk) 03:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Template talk:Timeline history of the British Isles

message: *Roman conquest of Britain
*Magna Carta
*Treaty of York
*Wars of Scottish Independence
*Scottish Reformation
*Union of the Crowns
*Wars of the Three Kingdoms
*Glorious Revolution
*Acts of Union 1707
*Battle of Culloden
*Act of Union 1800
Man vyi 06:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will add, thanks. (... Magna Carta, doh! I could I forget that!) --sony-youthpléigh 07:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested events

message: The Brythonic Kingdom of Strathclyde was arguably never fully integrated as a Roman province and went straight to being incorporated in Alba under joint Gaelic / Pictish rule, similarly Brythonic Gododdin came under the Angles then Alba, and of course the Picts may well have been Brythonic. Could the line between Brythons and Picts be moved over to indicate a direct Brythonic connection to Scotland (and part of England) via Hen Ogledd from the Roman departure, and perhaps be made broken to indicate doubts about how separate they were? The Picts and Gaels would logically come together by 900 in a box as Kingdom of Alba which expands to include the Scottish part of the Hen Ogledd by 1020, after 1286 coming under the Kingdom of Scotland. Hope that's not too complex, but even without the names, that's the way the diagram should look.
It would be good have a mention of the event(s) of the Anglo-saxon invasions. Also, the box for Kingdom of Norway is presumably a reference to their overlordship of the isles until the Treaty of Perth in 1266 and the northern isles until 1468, but as it's a redirect to Norway that link doesn't help much. Anyway, good work, .. dave souza, talk 10:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brythons straight to Scotland?

message: I suppose that it's difficult to adjust the events to the timeline, but there are at least two things that should be adjusted. Most important, it now seems the norman invasion of England (1066) took place before the Battle of Clontarf (1014). (I'm not sure whether Clontarf really was an event of such importance that it merit a place here anyway, the less known Battle of Tara was probably more important in halting Norse expansion in Ireland). Secondly, Vikingraids now appear to have started around AD 400, shortly before 800 is more accurate. Shortly after the appearence of raiding Vikings, there was also norse settlements in present day Scotland and Ireland. Agree with Dave about the not very relevant link to Kingdom of Norway, but I don't know what link would be relevant for this. Keep up the good work, Finnrind 11:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of events
Talk:Belmont, West Virginia

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 21:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sydney Orbital Network

message: Can we include a "picture" or an "image" of the Sydney Orbital please?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 06:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures or Image 

message: Seperating the Toll motorways from the freeways (no tolls)!!-— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎58.168.57.62 (talk) 07:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolls 

message: The M4, M5, ED and SHB should be cashless - Since the M2, SHT, CCT, LCT and M7 are all going "cashless" or are already cashless (no toll booths to hold-up the vehicles).-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 11:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The M4, M5, ED and SHB 

message: Found a Sydney Motorways website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 10:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sydney Motorways
Talk:Worthington, West Virginia

message: The beginning of this article is rendered in code, and has been for two days. I'm not programming-savvy enough to attempt a fix, but one is certainly in order! 2601:18C:4080:3E90:4CE1:1A6C:F6B:36A2 (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code showing up on page
Talk:Parks and open spaces in the London Borough of Southwark

message: "Goose Green, London" redirects to this page, but there is no mention of such a location.  If it's part of (or perhaps an alternate name for) one of the parks listed, that should be mentioned. 209.179.119.188 (talk) 22:16, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Goose Green? 
Talk:Parks and open spaces in the Royal Borough of Greenwich

message: Shooters Hill is not a park or an open space, it's a geographical feature / district containing multiple open spaces including Shrewsbury Park, Oxleas Woods, Woolwich Common plus the golf course, equine centre and Woodlands Farm which aren't fully open to the public. 81.174.149.251 (talk) 15:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shooters Hill 

message: Repository Woods isn't open to the public. 81.174.149.251 (talk) 15:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repository Woods
Talk:St Blazey engine shed

message: To my knowledge, the only locomotives currently allocated to St Blazey are 08 and 09 shunters. Class 66s work out of the depot but are allocated elsewhere, as are any other visiting engines. I don't think that any working 47s regularly appear here now, didn't the "heritage" locomotive get sent away recently?
As for the clay wagons, these are maintained by the C&W fitters based here, but I am not sure that it is correct to say that they are allocated to the engine shed. Geof Sheppard 07:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Allocation
Talk:Néstor García Canclini

message: It seems that we need to pay attention to those who can add content, and those who are doing the work that should be done by admins or sysops. The difference is that sysops know, for the most part, how to work with and under consensus. This page is an example of creating pages and pages of nothingness, referring to another page out of the encyclopedia that does exactly the same as Wikipedia is trying to do with respect to biographies only that much better, at this point, it is not funny anymore, it is ironic and sad. Is this a contribution or a disservice to Wikipedia's ideals? Well I guess is debatable as with every single issue. 
The issue remains the same, inputting information without conducting a proper research just because you can do it, What is the rush? while doing this you are chasing, and harassing others with some  suppose self-acclaimed "super-linguistic skills", only because they are working in the same areas or topics that you pretend to own or control. That is not working together with other wikipedists at all. It is ridiculous, that some people have so much time on their hands, or that enormous amount of disrespect over their  shoulders towards other contributors.  
I think that this user can contribute a little more by learning to add more content to the pages he/she is creating, because by now, thanks to this user, there are a lot o pages with labels, templates and all sort of things but no real content which is the main focus of this project.  I am concern by the quality and verifiable sources supporting all the pages that have been touched by these type of users. Giving the proper distance and time the result of the observation on this behavior has been proven to be a pattern based upon a set of deeply rooted beliefs of the cognitive level of this type of users. Something that many people have and are facing "graciously"  as I am writing this report on situ. -"-Todos Llegan de Noche, todos se van de día" 19:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abusing templates
Talk:Equiprobability

message: The two concepts are certainly related to one another, and to the Principle of indifference. I created these two entries separately mainly because they were separately listed here (also here) as redlinks. Given that the both the philosophers and the probabilists listed them as separately needed articles, and given that they are indeed separate ideas (in my opinion), with equipossible a more basic idea than equiprobable, I'm inclined to keep them separate in the hopes that more will be added to them. Hence, I oppose the merge. JJL 01:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. We might as well merge Axis powers of World War II and Allies of World War II on the same basis. Heh. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 12:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Boaz, West Virginia

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 00:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Jump in My Car

message: david ortiez said on conan that he loved this song 68.105.218.232 07:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I'd like help in adding the names of the female actresses to this entry!  Anyone know their names?  Can you add them?
: I heard it was Celine Prins in the car, but that needs verifying. Laurielegit (talk) 07:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Actresses

message: Someone who knows how to make these pages, please fix this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaximCHS (talk • contribs) 12:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The aricle is suppost to be about the song. Sarujo (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is why it should be about the song, starting with the original version, and only then getting to Hasselhoff's cover. As it stands, it's written as if the article is about Hasselhoff's version specifically. JudahH (talk) 01:05, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Hasselhoff's version gets a page, but Ted Mulry Gang's doesn't?
Talk:Brídín Brennan

message: objectivity
The site requires a re-write. It's a verbatim copy of what appears on the original website, and cannot be used in an encyclopedia.  I added the template accordingly.
smr 07:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article is supposedly sourced through the "External links" with an "unofficial" website, that does not have much but includes "...such a wonderful and talented artist that Brídín is.", and a dead link (buy this domain) fan site, so content would be assumed to have come from somewhere or possibly original research. Tagged since 2016 as having no sourcing the article is approaching career unsourced status.  Otr500 (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Yeast expression platform

message: POV: This article may have been created to advertise http://www.pharmedartis.de and their products. Many sentences sound kind of too enthusiastic. --134.76.88.99 08:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also really don´t see any other relevance - except advertising pharmedartis products. --84.62.8.91 05:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done some POV cleanup and this should look more like a real article now. An expert should review this to see if this is a fair treatment of the subject or biased, as suggested above, towards one application of yeasts. Antonrojo 12:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Touching the Void (film)

message: This article references the often-repeated idea that Simon Yates fell under 'widespread criticism' from the mountain climbing community for his actions on the mountain, but this may be apocryphal. He himself disputes it, saying that one newspaper did a "hatchet job" on him but that as soon as the facts were known he received mostly support from the mountain climbing community. An interview with him on this point is here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3120/is_3_78/ai_n29284890/    CaliforniaAndie (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: @CaliforniaAndie Agreed he had to cut the rope but the movie did not show Yates trying to shout into the crevasse. If this is true then he deserves some criticsm. 2600:8800:1701:AFD0:9CB5:CBB9:70E3:D601 (talk) 18:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Yates 

message: The article states that they finally believed Simpson was dead the last day but the film indicates that Yates thought he was dead the next morning, not even thinking to look into the crevasse after he saw it and knew Simpson must have gone in. Phil (talk) 02:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: When they believed Simpson was dead
Talk:George Seward (diplomat)

message: I have severe doubts that George Seward, the subject of this article, was a Californian.  From my research on the medical missionary doctor Sarah Cornelia Seward, I learned that she began her career with her brother George F Seward in China c. 1861-1865.  Dr. Sarah Seward later departed to India in 1871, and established a dispensary at Allahabad.  George and Sarah were the nephew and niece of William H. Seward, the US Secretary of State who engineered the purchase of Alaska from Russia.  William H Seward and Sarah C Seward both were born in the town of Florida, New York.  George F Seward also appears to have been born in this town.  George F Seward was born the same year as the subject of this article, and appears to have served in China at the same time as the subject of this article.  It seems highly likely that George F Seward is, indeed, the subject of this article.  I find no evidence that George F Seward is from California. -- JeffBillman (talk) 03:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary source for this article confirms he's from Florida, NY.  I've edited the page accordingly. -- JeffBillman (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Clark Ashton Smith bibliography

message: I just noticed that the list of poetry works ends at titles beginning with "M".  If the list of poems is to be included on this page, an enterprising editor should add any missing titles.  Thanks! - NYArtsnWords (talk) 05:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the Prose Poems.  The bibliography still lacks the complete poetry, the plays, non-fiction, etc. - NYArtsnWords (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the plays, the lyrics, and put up the complete poetry (including translations).  Eventually, the translations should perhaps be pulled out and put under a separate sub-heading (indicating what they are translations of), and all the poetry should be given links to online versions.  I have yet to add C.A.S.'s non-fiction. - NYArtsnWords (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete