lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Higher education in Japan

message: Where are all the costs from the 80s? I don't know about Japan but certainly in other parts of the world the cost of higher education has skyrocketed in that time. Maybe it's time to update that?
98.92.207.12 (talk) 12:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: From Look Japan
* English: https://web.archive.org/web/20020703010011/http://www.lookjapan.com/LBcoverstory/02JuneCS.htm
* Japanese: https://web.archive.org/web/20020702011144/http://www.lookjapan.com/JV/02JuneCS.htm
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look Japan article on foreign students at Japanese universities (2002) 

message: I remember higher education in Japan is in universities and junior colleges and fourth and fifth grades of colleges of technology and special training colleges, a category of special training schools, are post-secondary/tertiary education. In my opinion, we should delete colleges of technology and special training colleges. What do you think?--Bletilla (talk) 07:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About colleges of techonology and special training schools
Talk:Wild Dog (character)

message: DC started its Vigilante series before the Punisher got his own regular series.
Also Collins intended Wild Dog as an update of the Shadow, the Green Hornet, the Spider, etc.
He stated it would not necessarily be a comic book version of the Executioner (which the Punisher in many ways is) as it would mostly deal with terrorism. Since Collins was sued by the publishers of the Executioner at one point (Mack Bolan and his thief Nolan locking horns, though in Collins defense the names were the only similarities)is quite familiar with the dangers of pastiching of Don Pendleton. 
01:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This -definitely- needs cites before going into the main article. Lots42 (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: One should note that

message: Given that Nite-Wing and Wild Dog are in the same continuity...maybe one inspired the other. But Casey Jones is not, so simply noting the similarity is original research. Lots42 (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casey Jones 

message: No mention of the Wild Pup? After all, that's the clear inspiration for Nite-Wing.KhProd1 (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cites? Lots42 (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild Pup 

message: The Wild Dog character was originally called Red Dog. 
Unfortunately, a beer of the same name premiered before DC released the book and the publishers quickly substituted "Wild" for "Red". Too bad it was much ado about nothing...
174.102.18.89 (talk) 06:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  On an ironic note 

message: The Wild Dog character was originally called Red Dog. 
Unfortunately, a beer of the same name premiered before DC released the book and the publishers quickly substituted "Wild" for "Red". Too bad it was much ado about nothing...
174.102.18.89 (talk) 06:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  On an ironic note 

message: The Wild Dog character was originally called Red Dog. 
Unfortunately, a beer of the same name premiered before DC released the book and the publishers quickly substituted "Wild" for "Red". Too bad it was much ado about nothing...
174.102.18.89 (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  On an ironic note 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wild Dog (Comic book charactor). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wild Dog (Comic book charactor)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Transcription of Australian Aboriginal languages

message: There's a new poll here that would (hopefully) end all this "Indigenous" vs. "Aborigine" controversy. Feel free to vote. Zarbat 09:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Under the heading 'Early writing' I would like to summarise the known research that interprets the idiosyncratic transcription systems used by individual scribes, eg. Daisy Bates, Spencer & Gillen, etc. If this gets too long-winded it could moved to a separate main article entitled something like 'Early transcription conventions of Australian Aboriginal writers'. Such an article would make a genuinely useful reference for people working with the archives. Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AustKin (talk • contribs) 00:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New section?
Talk:Portable Appliance Test

message: This page seems a bit UK-centric. I don't know about practice in other English-speaking parts of the world
and if they don't use the term PAT they won't look at this article. So, if anyone from the USA, Canada,
Australia etc can contribute and make the page a bit more international that would be good.Sangwine 15:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: This page seems to attract link spam. I think a link to the dmoz category for UK PAT companies is fairer / more relevant - this was previously on the page but deleted. Gavint0 (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial Links
Talk:2006 Kerala Legislative Assembly election

message: Soman, I reverted your change because it contains too many links. If you see this message, Can you make the entried in the consolidated table as links.
Else I'll do it tomorrow.
I am off for the day...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkailas (talk • contribs) 15:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links reverted
Talk:Nirad C. Chaudhuri

message: Can someone please back up the descriptor "polymath"? 
Brilliant, sure, but I'm not convinced that he "excelled in multiple fields, particularly in both arts and sciences."
//Jugander 15:30, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polymath 

message: The standard of the article is quite abysmal. Moreover, out of context focus on a communal issue does seem to give a feeling that he is a Hindu communal activist. This article has to be improved beyond the capacities of the current writer who wrote article. And mischievous items removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.249.6 (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article standard is dubious
Talk:Stone, Staffordshire

message: I have corrected two existing major errors - titling the commander responsible for the fortifications as Duke of Cumberland (not Westmorland), that being Prince William (George II's son), and the winter period as 1745/46 (not 1745/49!)Cloptonson (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stone in the 'Forty Five Rebellion

message: Under the History section the account of Wulfad and Rufin's burial is parenthetically (described as 'historically valueless' by Thacker 1985: 6). It would be helpful if the author and publication was mentioned more fully but I notice this article lacks a bibliography and nothing to identify Thacker appears among the citations.Cloptonson (talk) 08:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's Thacker? clarification needed

message: The blyth bridge mentioned links to a place in the Scottish Borders. Is it not more likely that it refers to Blythe Bridge, 5 or so miles north of stone. 185.69.145.23 (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blyth(e) Bridge.
Template talk:Tiw

message: Tough, lots of inclusions not only on help pages. If the original version from Meta breaks whatever you're doing with  please replace it by .
 used to be a redirection to  for some months (?), and I hope that the updated "real"  from Meta is compatible with ,
but "hope" isn't "sure". Sorry for the confusion, IIRC it was my misguided attempt to make  "consistent" with , but the "real" 
is a bit more sophisticated than , it works with templates in any Wikipedia, not only the English Wikipedia. -- Omniplex 15:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential screw-up 

message: Please use  16@r (talk) 17:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This page doesn't have documentation at the moment. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

text: --Patrick (talk) 22:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Please replace the current code with...
(code previously here now out-of-date)
... i.e. makes the parenthesis secondary and uses hlist to separate the links within. The changes are cosmetic.
Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. —  (t • e • c) 19:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * This template doesn't have a sandbox or testcases. How about WP:BRD, especially as this isn't a particularly profound template..? Sardanaphalus (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

text: Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Just because those pages don't currently exist doesn't mean you can't create them, and this change should be tested via sandbox before going live.  Templates, due to their transclusion or substitution and the fact that every change is cascaded across every transclusion really should have all changes sandboxed to make sure they are right unless it is a simple punctuation or case fix. —  (t • e • c) 22:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * Template:Tiw/sandbox and Template:Tiw/testcases just created. If all now acceptable, this is the sandbox version to use. Sardanaphalus (talk) 13:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've just dropped the protection level to semi-protection as the template only had 300 transclusions, and most of them are in the talk namespace. You should be able to edit this yourself now. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

text: *Also, I agree with Technical 13 - even if the template is now semi-protected, it's still a good idea to test changes in the sandbox before updating the main template. Learning how to do that will also help you if you want to get the template editor right in the future. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * Understood. Thank you. Sardanaphalus (talk) 17:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 17 April 2014
Talk:The Golden Age (comics)

message: The film adaptation links to an article about Matthew Vaughn directing an adaptation of a completely unrelated project.  It should be deleted.  75.166.48.25 (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Adaptation Should be removed
Talk:Angara block

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Arki block

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Bero block

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:The Land (Epcot)

message: We should clarify the size on this article.  At one point it states it's "a 24 hectare (2.5 million square foot) facility" (broken link reference, by the way) and at another point it states "Pavilion size: 253,780 square feet".  That's an order of magnitude difference.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ   07:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of the pavilion
Talk:Something Wicca This Way Comes

message: According to the recently broadcast first episode, the plot has a number of errors in it. There is a video of the first episode on YouTube and I will be using it as a reference to make corrections.
Historyphysics (talk) 14:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the edit: This is an old revision of this page, as edited by  at 13:50, 15 November 2008, Tone had unilaterally changed the series pilot episode into a redirect.  Series first and last episodes are 'always notable, since they begin and end something otherwise covered as notable in these hallowed digital pages. // FrankB 16:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored from redirect

message: # https://www.google.de/books/edition/The_Greatest_Cult_Television_Shows_of_Al/Ql3UDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22charmed%22+and+%22lori+rom%22&pg=PA34&printsec=frontcover
# https://www.google.de/books/edition/The_Book_of_Three/kOLXviFxsWIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22charmed%22+and+%22lori+rom%22&pg=PT101&printsec=frontcover
# https://web.archive.org/web/20220614185742/https://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/charmed-cast-secrets-154161/
PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources on Lori Rom leaving
Talk:Simplex communication

message: Back in the day (ever since Edison's patent at least), a telephone was a single circuit, used to send in both directions, but only one way at a time.  That's just the way things worked.  When cabling was developed that allowed traffic in both directions at the same time, that was called duplex, and the old way was referred to as simplex.
Given that duplex has a path always open in each direction, half of that would be a path always open in one direction.  Assuming the words mean anything, that would seem to be the definition of half-duplex that makes sense.
A source I trust says that IBM got the definitions of "simplex" and "half-duplex" backwards in one of their glossaries, and that glossary was adopted as the standard.  Of course most web sites now parrot the ANSI standard point of view.  Is there any good reason other than a mistake behind the ANSI version of the definition? Dpv 15:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for ANSI standard?

message: I'm looking for an exact definition of dual-simplex, which probably should be mentioned on this page.  I think that I know how it relates to simplex and duplex, but it would be great to have someone who knows for sure add it in explicitly. Cashannon 16:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dual-simplex? 

message: I support the recent proposal to merge Simplex and Duplex. It would eliminate redundancy, and the need to keep both articles consistent.   Ideally I would like to see them merged into a new article Simplex and duplex, with redirects from each of the individual terms, but would support a merge into either term. --ChetvornoTALK 18:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article and [[Duplex (telecommunications)|Duplex]]
Talk:Canada in the World Wars and Interwar Years

message: * More on women's Suffrage - The Famous Five (Canada)
* WWI - Ukrainian Canadian internment
* WWII - Japanese Canadian internment
*Statute of Westminster (1931)
*Establishment of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
*More info on the Winnipeg General Strike
*More info on the On to Ottawa Trek
*The Chinese Immigration Act, 1923
*King-Byng Affair
*1923 Railway Agreement on immigration
*Moose River Mine disaster  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.22.75 (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible subjects to Add:

message: would be a good idea here... It would also be a good idea to lump labour unrest under one section. Bobanny 06:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Could someone expand the lead paragraph to include a summary of all the major points of the article as per MOS:LEAD? I'm a horrible writer, plus I would rather not mar it with a  tag. -- œ™ 00:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead section too short
Talk:Johnston City, Illinois

message: Can we get a list of current gov. officials on this and other city pages. History of the office holders is probably not needed, but current officers I think should be included. 68.216.129.143 15:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chanho block

message: Please making any redirection link to Ranchi district, please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, please read and understand User:Angela/Stubs. Thank you. --Bhadani 16:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Bundu block

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Saint Edward Seminary

message: Hi, I saw your edit on the Kenmore page and, being nosy, came over here to see what you were doing. ^_^ A quick suggestion is that it would be nice if there was a consistent use of St. Edward's and St. Edward. However, I don't know enough to know what that might be, so I didn't just do it. ^_^ --Solarbird 15:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: S or no S?

message: The seminary's purpose was to teach diocesan priests, not priests for the Sulpician order. I don't know of any graduates who became Sulpicians. rewinn 03:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Staffed by, but not for, Sulpicians
Talk:Human Target

message: How many issues of the ongoing  were produced? Just the 10 collected into trades or were there more?142.167.122.185 07:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues?

message: I am quite wary of the art side of the creator credit for this character going solely to Carmine Infantino, as it has always been my impression that he did no more than provide layouts for the first story, while Chance was visually designed by inker and subsequent regular full artist Dick Giordano. --Tbrittreid (talk) 23:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: I should have done this quite some time ago. I have noticed that in the on-screen credits for the new Human Target TV series, Len Wein and Infantino get the "created by" credit, which I can't argue against. However, it reads "Based on DC Comics characters created by...." Note the plural, but none of the supporting cast in this show appeared in the original Action Comics/The Brave and the Bold/Detective Comics "Human Target" stories which that credit must refer to. --Tbrittreid (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: With the "old man" plot still waiting to be unspooled, it's possible one or more other characters from the original stories will appear in season one. - Dravecky (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creator credit 

message: I'd like to merge the additional Human Target article (the one published under the Vertigo subheading) with this one - as it is now, there's more focus on the two brief (thus far) tv shows than the lengthier comic history that spawned them, and the comic material in this article (which seems to be the primary reason said article exists) isn't different enough or lengthy enough to merit separation from the article on the Vertigo series. Anyone agree/disagree? Darquis (talk) 22:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the infobox image here is a Vertigo cover, yeah, I agree. --Tbrittreid (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Should be added to the list, he appears at the Detectives Convention 2003:C9:F19:4CEB:EDBA:537E:6DF0:A6C6 (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameo in Crisis on Infinite Earths 11
Talk:Ramona

message: I'm going to put this article on hold until a few issues are sorted out. Heres a guide for you:
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Basically the prose, particularly in the plot section, needs work, and more references need to be found. Other than that, it does look like a very good article. Grover 11:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for your time in reviewing this article. Specifically, which portions do you think need more references? I will see what I can do about the plot summary section. Thanks. howcheng  {chat} 16:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Wow, nice work in a very short period of time! I think that's enough for a good article. Well done to all and good luck in the future! Grover 08:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Nomination 

message: I've gone through the text copyediting and doing some minor work. Fixed the issues that were had with NPOV, added a (very brief) section about adaptations. The "plot" section needs heavy editing imo, to bring it up to the standard of the rest of the article. I don't know the novel, however, so I leave that to others. Same goes for the needed citations. Did a quick google search, but couldn't find anything useful. Perhaps someone who has actually read the book will have better luck. Norwaystudent (talk) 22:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bringing the article back to GA standard 

message: A Call for Reform: The Southern California Indian Writings of Helen Hunt Jackson edited by Valerie Sherer Mathes and Phil Brigandi, 2015, University of Oklahoma Press -- annotated edition of the works that became Ramona (per Chronicle weekly book list). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps of interest
Talk:LiLiPUT

message: *LiliPUT are from Switzerland, which is in Europe, so British English is used, and bands are plural in British English. Furthermore, they are no longer a band, so it makes sense to talk about them in the past tense.
*Saying their music was of consistent quality over their career is not an encyclopaedic fact, that is your opinion.
*We do not need to mention that the history comes from the Kleenex article, since any information added to the Kleenex article was added under GFDL, so is public domain.
*Please do not sign the article namespace, this is a wiki. It says at the bottom of the editing page "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."
Hope this clears things up. Jdcooper 16:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: The current discography is incomplete, has errors and redundancies. Anyone want a crack at it? Morganfitzp 19:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Snooker Loopy

message: Please do not link to lyrics sites. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's Copyright policy, as such sites are all copyright violations (the song's lyrics are either copyrighted by the writers, by their label, or by a music publishing company like BMI or ASCAP), and WP does not link to copyright violations.  There is no need for the article here to do that anyway, as any reader can find the lyrics with a simple Google search in seconds. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 20:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics sites