Talk:Fokker

message: Fokker Aerospace Technologies still exists, it became part of GKN aerospace who also provides maintance services and updates to the still flying Fokker 50, 70 and 100 planes under the name FlyFokker. In addition to that Fokker aerospace still has operating factories where parts are made for various other companies that providing airplanes (Such as Airbus) in Papendrecht(NL) and Hoogeveen (NL), Romania, Mexico and the USA in accordance with their own website. (Source GKN Aerospace website). I find it a bit odd information like this isn't documented on the page. V60club (talk) 23:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fokkers current operations

message: If the company was founded in 1919,how could the Red Baron have died flying a Fokker in 1917?
-
I agree, that's got to be incorrect. I'm no expert, but Fokker were one of the first established aircraft manufacturers during WWI...Nikevs 22:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed!  FranksValli 00:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Wasnt this fixed nearly ten-years ago? MilborneOne (talk) 19:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding year? 

message: I have uploaded a drawing of the Fokker F.IX, which dates to the early 1930's.  This was a military bomber, born of the more famous FVII/3m and /b, which were the commercial transport and bomber variants, respectively.  I know it's kind of silly to ask for the creation of a new article around a picture, but, I think an article should be written.  The image is found here. --MyWikiBiz 04:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only a ten-year wait for an answer! see Fokker F.IX. MilborneOne (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fokker F.IX 

message: I removed this "joke", because it has nothing to do with Fokker and was really too juvenile for words.
--Recoloniser 11:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Fokkers 

message: At the time nothing much was said in the press about competition from Airbus and Boeing.  Obviously mismanangement played a big role, but the real killer, accoring to the stories in the newspapers at the time, was a bit of dumping by BAe.  BAe's 146 was a competitor for the F100, but had not been a great success, mostly due to it's high operating costs.  When it was obvious that Fokker was in difficulties, BAe management apparently saw it's chance and guaranteed a lower price to all potential Fokker customers than whatever Fokker was asking them for it's F100, even if that meant selling at a loss.  Since BAe's pockets were a lot deeper than Fokker's and DASA was not willing to match BAe, Fokker lost and went under.  The curious thing about this is that BAe's dumping policy should have brought it into conflict with the European Commission, but apparently it didn't.
--Recoloniser 11:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fokker's bankruptcy 

message: I think he should be called by his real name Anton Herman Gerard Fokker  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.126.238 (talk) 03:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not relevant to this article as he was known as Anthony Fokker in English. The Anthony Fokker article details his real name. MilborneOne (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthony Fokker 

message: I maintain that since North American Aviation evolved from Fokker Aircraft of America and that that company was in fact founded by Anton Fokker and was the last aviation company with which he was affiliated, North American's impact on World War II is both ironic and relevant.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.103.47.95 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 8 October 2008
:The activities of North American have nothing to do with the Dutch company, ironic and relevant are not encyclopedic. It might be relevant in the Anthony Fokker article but even that is doubtful. MilborneOne (talk) 19:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By that logic, you should delete all references to Anthony Fokker moving to the USA and forming the American branch of the company.207.103.47.95 (talk) 19:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Atlantic was a licence holder and related to the Dutch Fokker company, North American wasnt. MilborneOne (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II and North American Aviation

message: Shouldn't there be something about the attempt by the Dutch government to entice Bombardier to buy the then bankrupt Fokker?  76.66.196.229 (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombardier 

message: is named by or after Fokker? http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokkernadel --Helium4 (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fokkernadel (German) = Fokker needle 

message: I just got myself nice and confused by looking at this and thinking it was the Focke-Wulf page - i was thinking of adding a little "not to be confused with" line, but it might just be an example of one off stupidity on my part. Does anyone else think that these are similar enough to warrant a not to be confused with line? TommrtnTalk 07:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Dont think it needs any comment certainly never heard of the two ever being confused. Not something I would have considered as being that similar. MilborneOne (talk) 12:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to be confused with Focke 

message: The following sentence mystifies me (at least): "Fokker engineers were working on the Fokker-Leimberger, an externally-powered 12 barrel gatling gun in the 7.92x57mm round capable of firing over 7200RPM it had the spent brass ruptured." (Emphasis added.)
This seems clear until the last six words. In this context, "spent brass" is slang for empty ammunition shells, but the significance of the "brass" is unclear. The fate of the gun is also not explained. 
Does anyone know what is meant and/or the further history of the Fokker-Leimberger? 
Grant | Talk 11:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fokker-Leimberger gatling gun 

message: As the request for sources were already in since August '08, I rephrased the WWI section a bit, which was slightly biased (in my biased opinion). I hope it now is worded in a more neutral way. --Antheii (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fokker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060515190744/http://library.thinkquest.org/C002752/ to http://library.thinkquest.org/C002752/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified