lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Exotheology

message: Three references to major news media should be sufficient. Prod removed. -Arb. (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 

message: I propose that Exotheology be merged into Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact. I think that the content in the Exotheology article can easily be explained in the context of Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact, and the Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Exotheology will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Srinivasasha (talk) 06:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jad Mada (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions

message: I'm surprised nobody here has mentioned Ellen G. White from the Adventist movement in the late 1800s who often spoke of many unfallen worlds in her writings. 2601:989:4581:D0A0:D5A3:219B:DF65:9D1B (talk) 13:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ellen White's belief in "Unfallen Worlds"
Talk:HD 188753 Ab

message: I removed the whole section on the planet's characteristics, as it had all been copied from . The website says "Copyright © 1996-2007,John Whatmough. All Rights Reserved.". It's better to just remove such things instead of preventing access to this page with a copyvio notice.--Planetary 00:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section
Talk:Mu La Flaga

message: Poor English translation?  Please.  The English translation that the writer of the first paragraph (which is VERY unencyclopedic and reeks of fanon) rails against is the official Bandai translation (note the word Official).  Thus, it trumps earlier and nongrammatical spellings of his name, including Mwu La Fllaga.  The doubled consonant was a major problem in the late Japanese spellings of many of the character names. -- Iceberg3k 14:49, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
In that case, shouldn't we adjust the various pages mentioning Neo Lorrnoke to Neo Roanoke, since that is the offical Bandai translation of his name?
--208.104.166.30 18:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First heading 

message: the page seems a little off with the image needs repair...--Spartan117009 20:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  what happened to the page 

message: Exactly where did this come from? Is it from the show or an other official source? I'm rather curious about this... what is the source? Is there a link? 74.116.137.2 23:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course his father's entry doesn't cite sources, either.  Labeling him as Canadian or French-Canadian appears to be mere speculation. Edward321 06:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  French-Canadian? 

message: I would like the Wikipedia administrators to listen to this statement-I absolutely do not think that the plot of this page is overlong.  Instead, I think that every Gundam Seed character page should be this long.Andrewlim1 12:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not overlong

message: If La Flaga is Mu's surname, then why is his father named Al Da Flaga? --Silver Edge 08:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name
Talk:Ground loop (electricity)

message: In this edit the section title was changed from "Balanced line" to "Differential signaling".  In fact, the description of the advantages of the scheme (good common-mode rejection) is exactly the advantages of using balanced lines.  Differential signalling helps neither CMR nor ground loop noise.  If the line is not balanced and the more earthy leg of the line has ground loops induced then the receive end will pick this up since it is not common mode. SpinningSpark 17:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks for reverting that. ~Kvng (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance and differential 

message: Ground_loop_(electricity)#In_low_frequency_audio_and_instrumentation_systems presents an example and then gives reason why it is a bad example (I have moved this to a note for now). Turntables do generally have a separate ground wire and if you do not connect it, you typically do get a hum. I have tried to research why the separate ground is necessary and whether a ground loop is involved and the information on the internet is swamped by hand waving from vinyl enthusiasts. Can anyone offer an EE treatment of this example? ~Kvng (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't the "separate ground" from the pickup cable shield?  If so, it's fairly self-explanatory why not connecting it causes a problem.  I agree that that is not a ground loop problem. SpinningSpark 15:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume this ground connects to the chassis of the turntable. If you have a magnetic cartridge, it should be a balanced system. I guess the problem is the preamp is single-ended. ~Kvng (talk) 13:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turntable grounding
Talk:Mary Carpenter

message: Does this need a disambiguation note with respect to Mary Chapin Carpenter?
::Done Jezhotwells (talk) 00:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig

message: I corrected the baptisim location and burial location and stressed the English connection. I tried to add the links to her brother and father but did not do it right. A better editor could correct this.
I also added some "See Alsos." 
John R. Carpenter
La Mesa, CA
Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Edit

message: I am recasting this article to follow WP:MOS and wikify links, etc. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Jarry,
I thought links going to pages that are not there cause red text in the article. Red text can lower the rating of the article. If you want the red text ... okay fine.  Jrcrin001 (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lower the rating of the article? Huh? Anyhow, no, in an ideal world we would not have redlinks because all possible articles would exist. But we're not there yet, nor will we ever reach that place. Red links highlight articles that should be created, and provide a handy click-and-type method for creating them, and, as such, they're an integral part of Wikipedia. As ever, we have guidelines on red links, which you can find at WP:REDLINKS. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed my intention to create a Lewin's Mead article,but that willahve to wait until I am back in Bristol, circa mid-May. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to know about all of the above.  I'll look foward to seeing what you do for Lewin Mead. Jrcrin001 (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Links 

message: We currently read 
'Europe and America...... between the years of 1857 and 1746.'
Clearly this is a mistake. Can someone knowledgeable about the topic please correct this? Thanks!!
Grandma Roses (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion about dates 
Talk:Stanley Black & Decker

message: *The title of the article still says Stanley Works, when the company is now known as Stanley Black & Decker. Please change it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by InfoFan (talk • contribs) 16:28, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: Stanley Supply & Services is still listed under Industrial and automotive repair section, Stanley Supply & services is now known as JENSEN Tools + Supply so, please change Stanley Supply & Services to JENSEN Tools + Supply.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.86.209.200 (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change

message: Stanley Black & Decker is also the parent company of Stanley Access Technologies, a global manufacturer of automatic doors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.5.122.1 (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Access Technologies
Talk:United States Air Force Security Forces

message: Air Force Security Forces Association - Top Cops & Chiefs". www.afsfaonline.com. Retrieved 27 November 2020. https://www.afsfaonline.com/index.php/gallery/usaf-top-cops-and-their-chiefs 153.24.73.60 (talk) 06:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 08:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2021 

message: My source of this information is the Air Force Times.  I also feel it would be beneficial to list the four Air Force Office of Special Investigation (AFOSI) Special Agents killed. That information is provided in the same Air Force Times article.  That url is as follows:
https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2015/12/23/six-airmen-killed-in-afghanistan-identified/. Ssgtmoore007 (talk) 09:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: We generally don't include the names of casualties unless they are themselves notable. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 July 2021
Talk:ALIWEB

message: I think we should list every living soul that is living or dead that is not involved with aliweb so it will be extremely clear all the people that have nothing to do with Alwieb.  Don't you agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.131.11.143 (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was a broken external link in the article.  When Ed Johnston removed it, he asked in his edit summary "if anyone remembers what this was, or why it relates to Aliweb."  It was Jeremy M. Norman's From Gutenberg to the Internet Timeline—here's an unbroken link to it—with a November 30 Aliweb entry under 1993.  (The book [] is also cited in Wikipedia:Wikipedia in books#June 2005.)
When the link was added last year, aliweb.com promoters (see Talk:Aliweb/Archive 1) were still chewing on the article and it seemed that every scrap of historical verification was needed to help fend them off.  This article is currently a better source than the timeline. The only reason I see to include it is for its placement of Aliweb in chronological context. — Athaenara  ✉  16:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: EL to timeline
Talk:Felix Sabates

message: :Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:01, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Cleanup Archive 
Talk:Recovered factory

message: *Argentina
**Global (Baloons), Buenos Aires 
**Ediciones Marymar (books), Buenos Aires 
**Zanón 
**CUC (ex Gatic) (shoes), Buenos Aires 
*Uruguay
**Dymac (textile), Montevideo  (05/10/2005)
**Molino Santa Rita (flaur mill), Canelones 
I just added a link for an external site that lists all the known recovered enterprises in South America. --Brian Z 21:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In other countries
Talk:John Langley

message: :Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:03, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Cleanup Archive 

message: He literally made millions off of supporting and documenting the corruption of police departments. He documented all of what his staff reordered but never once intervened and said they sh*t is messed up. 2601:441:467F:E40:C0E0:7DE7:1E06:51E2 (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He made millions off of exploiting black people 

message: Why not show the outcome of the people who get arrested 2603:3027:353:C000:2C56:E8A0:E65D:F973 (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow thru
Talk:Alt.atheism

message: alt-atheism.org is the "official" (as such goes on Usenet) website of the newsgroup. I host and maintain the site so it's technically "mine" but if anyone is worried about potential self-promotion, they can check with the regulars on the newsgroup to confirm alt-atheism.org is the recognized group site. It is, definitely, the location of the official FAQ maintained by Michelle Malkin.
--Mark K. Bilbo 15:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the external links 

message: It's not really accurate to say alt.atheism (or any Usenet newsgroup) is "subdivided" into other groups. Even though they may be arranged heirarchically, they act as independent groups. Also added that alt.atheism.moderated has apparently been abandoned. It's discussed sporadically on alt.atheism but nobody seems overly concerned about having a moderated group again. 
Finally, I'm not sure it's quite appropriate but I'm pleading special circumstances. I host the newsgroup's website and live just outside the Katrina disaster area. I took the site down for the evacuation (and pulled hard drives like crazy) and the machine has been flaky since. I doubt the site will be up this year. Things are, well, difficult since Katrina visited. Mark K. Bilbo 03:48, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Subgroups" and such 

message: I think that the first sentence in the last section is very POV, by claiming that only fundamentalists would protest alt.atheism. The sentence seems very loaded to make people think ill of thiests. Lord of Light 22:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually if the purpose of the group is to promote atheism then it should welcome those who disagree and debate with them, not make fun of them or call them names. It its purpose is to be a social club for atheists (nothing wrong with that) then outsiders are trolls. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: For those of you who have been hounding me for decades to document the date of creation and the identity of the creator. Here you go. 2/6/1990 was when I issued the newgroup command for alt.atheism, and I tracked down a copy of my announcement of same in alt.pagan using Google Groups.  Enjoy. =brian 
Bhawthorne (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I finally tracked down my original announcement of the newsgroup
Talk:Ezmlm

message: :Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Cleanup Archive 

message: It may be worth pointing out in this article that there is another free mailing list project out there which is modeled on Ezmlm's design, but without the exim dependency.  It's called mlmmj, though it doesn't appear to have a Wikipedia page yet. Jonabbey (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  mlmmj 
Talk:Dungeon (band)

message: Good work to whoever created this page, i can confirm that everything here seems to be accurate - www.dungeon.cd is the offical site of the band that contains most of the info on this page.
I disagree, everything here seems to be opinion for example "a well earned reputation" and phrases of that nature{{subst:image source|Image:171 logo.jpg)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if "everything" is opinion, but if something is, edit it out. BrianFG 22:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Child art

message: There is a deletion discussion about the scribble image on: . --Paddyez 15:11, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of one image

message: The section about the stages of child art are descriptive, but they contain some statements that may be interpreted as generalizations of all children. It's not a huge concern, but it could use some cleanup. --Gray Porpoise 01:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalizations 

message: Who decided that 12 years old is the limit?  Is that a generally agreed-upon definition, and if so, source? --Dingbats (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of 12? 

message: The Criticisms section quotes John Holt on how child's art is an adult invention, but doesn't elaborate on what this means. I think this could do with an expansion and clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.220.253 (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Criticisms Section
Talk:Victim impact statement

message: making some minor sanity changes and internationalised the article somewhat
Some of the original article is bizarre and misleading for UK/Australian law at least, and I'd be surprised if generally true for US - that the victim suggests sentence or punishment?  I don't know about elsewhere, but in UK/Australian law that's crazy: the legion reasons can be summarised that (a) it's the Judge's job to decide sentence and (b) it's a misconception of the role of the VIS to go beyond informing the court to entering the court's decision making.  Among other things, it would undermine the 'restorative' notion of VIS's by creating a false notion that victims are having a say in the sentence when they don't - the Judge solely determines.
That said, there's some programs, usually juvenile ones, where the victim and offender reconcile and agree on reparation etc.
also changed 'murder', because there's a great many crimes distinct from murder that result in a dead victim.  dangerous driving, criminal negligence, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.58.159 (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 17:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: I think that this article could be improved with some mention of the usage  and effects of "Victim impact statements" in the UK. There is some relevant press coverage available online.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.53.9 (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Formal name in england and wales is Victim Personal Statements.©Geni (talk) 19:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: UK?

message: There is some material for a controversy or criticism section in this article from the New Yorker :  
And :
 MonsieurD (talk) 16:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material for a criticism or controversy section
Talk:Vivekananda Kendra

message: :Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:24, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now deleted as a useless redirect. --Michael Snow 05:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Cleanup Archive 

message: Okay, so I have not been able to find any other information on Vivekananda outside of Wikipedia. Evidently it, along with quite a few other surveys, are Hindu organisations in India (see Survey_of_Hindu_organisations), which are equally unwikified if not outright unencyclopaedic. Some verification of all these articles would be nice. Tamarkot 03:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't judge its significance beyond the website itself, but wouldn't be surprised if it's plenty significant in its field. Religious groups in India wouldn't necessarily have the biggest web presence in the world. I've tried to at least make the information mildly coherent and presentable. --Michael Snow 05:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Return of the cleanup
Talk:Lidocaine

message: I am a non-chemist/biologist but do enjoy reading a bit in depth about subjects when they spur my interest. The Chemistry part of this page is obviously written by a passionate chemist, maybe so much that they forgot that Wiki is meant to encourage curiosity and make knowledge more accessible (not just available).
The section could be improved with some internal linkage to terminology (Wiki pages) that is ambiguous across context/fields of science  (e.g. "conforming"). 
You don't need to go crazy with links. For example linking to "molecule" or "bonds" is maybe a bit too much, but at least the lesser known terminology would be welcomed. 87.209.254.60 (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry maybe needs more linkage?
Talk:Academic Games

message: The programs linked to are unoptimized, but I am working on optimizing them for both size and speed.
I'm an active player in the Palm Beach County League down here in Florida. I have made programs for the Ti-83/84 Plus calculators for the variations AB+ and Multiple of K. You can download them at ticalc.org, or follow the links: Multiple of K AB+
Is there a reason why this page is labelled with a "need to clean up"? Upon casual persual, it looks okay. Janet13 15:28, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Productivism

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Doc ask? 00:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The very first sentence (definition of productivism) is directly off the 'reference.com' website. That ok? See link
Productivism
--Cuzza fin (talk) 13:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I may edit this article later, but I'd add that criticism of productivism as such is not only grounded in ecology, but also the loss in human autonomy (from constantly working to produce and consume more), and non-monetary forms of social organization and exchange.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PalimpsestCleaner (talk • contribs) 14:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Motivations for Productivism

message: I think this article as it is more confusing than informative, and you end up actually knowing less about its topic after reading it . 
First of all, it defines Productivism in a mather of fact way, like a word in a dictionary, it doesn't mention its origins, roots, predecessor and creators. It gives the impression its a general , vague and basic belief ; too prevalent and ubiquitous to human culture that you cant pinpoint its origin, like the concept of optimism . As a matter of fact, the first definition tied to an actual person appears on the "Criticism of productivism " section.
"While critics of productivism and its political-economic variants, notably capitalism and socialism, challenge the notions of conventional political economy and argue for an economic policy more compatible with humanity, these views are often dismissed as utopian by economists and political scientists,"
Are capitalism & socialism critics of productivism or variants of it ? It doesnt make sense either way for me . 
Finally, what is this article even? It opens up saying that "Productivism or growthism is the belief " ,but by the looks of its categories its a economic theory . But  i came to it from a link from constructivism, which implies that it is a art movement / theory ("he INKhUK debates of 1920–22 had culminated in the theory of Productivism propounded by Osip Brik and other"). But at the same time there's this Productivism (art) page. Was it just a mix up? what are the relations between these?
Im obviously a layman , so i cant just fix this article up, but i felt it was important to state how confused i was by this article as someone trying to learn from it. Nilanz (talk) 18:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is doing more bad than good