Talk:Return to Never Land

message: In Return to Never Land the crocodile was replaced by an orange octopus for no apparent reason. It is now believed that since the crocodile was killed (we see it on Hook), the octopus, who was the crocodile's best friend, is determined to kill Hook for revenge.
I'm sorry, but whoever wrote this is terribly mistaken for several reasons. First of all, the crocodile and the octopus never met. There was never any indication of them once knowing one another. Also, Return To Never Land is a sequel to the 1950s Disney version of Peter Pan...not a sequel to Hook. Even though Captian Hook does say he got rid of the crocodile, he never said that he killed it. For all we know, he could've just somehow driven the crocodile away or captured him.
The reason why the octopus went after Captain Hook was explained in the film. Hook was going to sacrifice Jane (whom Hook thought was Wendy) to the octopus (called "the beast" in the film) for food. But, due to Peter Pan and Tinkerbell's pixie dust, the octopus ended up landing on Hook and Hook ended up inside the octopus's mouth. Much like the crocodile, the octopus liked the taste of Hook and decided to persue him in order to devour the evil pirate.
--24.111.137.236 23:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.129.135.81 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um, the octopus and the crocodile never met 

message: I don't see anything for box office. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.70.218.215 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Box office

message: 69.0.41.239 made a bunch of changes to this entry, some of which (changing Danny to a girl) are vandalism, while some (adding Andrew McDonough are valid). Does someone want to read the thing carefully to take out the bad edits, as well as tighten it up a bit?Cheeselouise 05:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: The page's listing of the soundtrack was rather screwed up, including listing Jeff Bennett as the singer of "I'll Try (Reprise)" instead of Jonatha Brooke. Brooke was listed as the singer of "So To Be One of Us" and "Hook and the Lost Boys" instead of the tracks she did contribute ("I'll Try," "I'll Try (Reprise)," and "Second Star to the Right." I went ahead and fixed it. KyrieEleison (talk) 04:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack

message: :Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg

message: This movie is cheesy and Jane has a pain scream.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.116.44 (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst Sequel Ever 

message: Lots of people think this was a terrible movie, that's why it's hard to find in stores.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.224.17.135 (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings 

message: In this edit an IP removed the "Differences from the novel" section. (It has since been reverted) They did not provide an explanation, shame on them, but if I were to guess, it's because the removed content represents an unsourced analysis of differences between the film and the book, with an emphasis on unsourced. Though some facts can be directly observed "Character A was not in the novel" there are some interpretive comparisons: The paragraph claims that one character is depicted as more tomboyish, it states that this film is more properly a sequel to the 1953 film, not the novel, etc. that kind of stuff constitutes WP:OR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences from the novel section 

message: Wendy is reconciled with Danny, but he's not been introduced.  Shite writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.133.10.249 (talk • contribs) 15 March 2017 (UTC)
:Maybe you could try improving it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Who? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Return to Never Land. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65u92Kono?url=http://youngartistawards.org/noms24.htm to http://youngartistawards.org/noms24.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified