lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elliptical wing

message: I don't believe the 109 family has ellliptical wings. An elliptical wing is not the same thing as rounded wingtips which is what 109's have. Spitfire and P-47 are the best known aircraft with elliptical wings. - Emt147 Burninate! 05:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rounded tips

message: What about these?
:That's an annular wing, which is a completely different animal. Nibios (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ellipse wing? 

message: Why this is said like this "...the external wing outline of the excellent 1930s era Mitsubishi A5M carrier fighter was almost identical to that of the Spitfire, in spite of being brought into service well before the Spitfire was"? It implies that the Japanese copied the British, being the Japanese a previous design? English not my native language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.25.152.222 (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you have a point, even though it is not clear what the author of that sentence was trying to imply. In addition to that Wikipedia is not about opinions, but facts or information from reliable sources. Thus, because that statement is not backed by a citation, we can delete it.--Gciriani (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Talk:Geoff Griffin

message: Cricinfo's obituary calls him Geoff rather than Geoffrey. This is for information only, as I've set up a redirect from Geoff Griffin. Loganberry (Talk) 18:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a feeling that Geoff is much more common than Geoffrey. Tintin (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might have noticed that I moved it. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: An awful lot of this article - the business with Bradman for example. - lacks citation. Reading books by contemporary players - Walker Trueman. Griffen clearly had a dodgy action.Fieldgoalunit (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation
Talk:Global Underground

message: I've just created a couple of pages for the Global Underground releases 006 to 019. I was unable to locate info on 008 on the Global Underground website, so I couldn't do that one, and the info on the GU website for 005 didn't match up with the info found at Allmusic.com, which I was using to cross-check playlists & playtime. If anyone has these albums, please create the two sites. I'll create pages 020 through to 028 during the holidays. I've also taken the liberty of standardizing the previous album pages, so there's a consistency with the ones I've recently added. robotusch 05:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for info

message: These were not mixed by The Forth as stated, but by Lee Burridge for the first one, and Danny Howells for the second, as stated here.  . Cheers 87.114.77.182 21:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  24/7 Cds 

message: I removed this from the article as it isn't true:
One thing that may confuse people is that in the Unites States GU002 DOES exist. It is actually Paul Oakendfold's New York set which was later labeled and released as GUOO7. Though the track listing is the same, there is different artwork for this version compared to that of GU007. These are very difficult to find, and those who do have one feel that they have a "collector's item" in their collections.
The original UK releases are numbered differently than the US releases.  This is apparently confusing for some people, but take a look at the numberings in the Catalog section - it clears things up.  I'm not sure what exactly the editor is trying to say is a collectors item, but GU007 certainly isn't a collectors item (its available on Amazon UK) and I don't know why the US re-release would be a collector's item either.  Wickethewok (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought 002 was the t-shirt? I remember reading that on a forum several years ago. I could be wrong though. Middleeasternfilms (talk) 02:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: GU002

message: There's a section on Lights Out albums saying "Steve Lawler was allowed to dive into what were considered new territories of time including remixing tracks for his compilations. He also included music and methodology that had never been used on studio mixed CDs before."
I can't fathom what this "methodology never used before on CDs" is, and since I've never read about such revolutionary technique before, I'll probably remove it.
Jokkk (talk) 23:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lights Out 

message: GU44 should be temporarily removed from the table of releases as it's not yet released. According to the official Global Underground site, release date is 25th November 2022. Mckenzie Weir (talk) 17:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to temporarily remove GU44.
Talk:Max-flow min-cut theorem

message: Why is the number of cuts 2^{|V|-1}-1\,, and not 2^{|V|-2}\,, as the article previously said? For |V|=3\,, there is one node u\, apart from s\, and t\,. There are two different cuts, one with u \in S and one with u \in T. But 2^{|V|-1}-1=2^{3-1}-1=3\,. I think perhaps the editor did not read that s \in S and t \in T was fixed? Klem fra Nils Grimsmo 07:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of cuts 

message: I'm trying to make an image to capture the liquid-flowing-through-pipes concept.
	
Not entirely happy with it, but I think it's a start. ~ Booya Bazooka 23:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm reluctant to call anything generated by my beloved Graphviz "old and busted", but I like the new hotness --- you don't see a lot of color in CS articles.  It might be nice to do something to indicate that s and t are the source and sink, but I think this should definitely go in... --mgreenbe (talk) 16:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visualization 

message: This "generalized max-flow min-cut theorem" is a trivial corollary of the max-flow min-cut theorem.  It is not a generalization at all!  It should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.227.211 (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalized Max-Flow Min-Cut Theorem 

message: I don't understand the 'min cut'-side of the linear programming formulation: how are these numbers p_i defined? Where do the d_{ij} come from? Could someone extend this part of the article?
(Also: the inequallity out-flow minus in-flow at vertex i is non-negative in the LP-formulation of 'max flow' seems odd: shouldn't that be an equallity instead of an inequallity?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Octonion (talk • contribs) 18:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linear programming formulation 

message: "The value of a flow is defined by 
:|f| = \sum\nolimits_{\{v : (s,v)\in E\}} f_{sv}=\sum\nolimits_{\{v : (v,t)\in E\}} f_{vt}, 
where as above  is the source node and  is the sink node. In the fluid analogy, it represents the amount of fluid entering the network at the source node, *minus* the amount of flow leaving the network at the sink node."
Isn't "minus" wrong here? Actually IN flow minus OUT flow should always be zero (given the aforementioned!).
- Anonymous, 2018-10-24
:I think you are right, I fixed it. --Erel Segal (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flows - mistake ? 

message: This is currently marked as a "vital article" but I find that rather incredible. Out of the 22K articles we have in mathematics, I find it unbelievable that this could ever rise above a rating of "mid priority" (even that seems a stretch) and ascend to the ranks of "vital". 67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  vital article -- really?
Talk:Lieutenant Marvels

message: What is the proper collective nomenclature for Lt. Hill Marvel, Lt. Fat Marvel and Lt. Tall Marvel?  While Lieutenant Marvels is used in the title, Lieutenants Marvel is used in the picture's caption and is grammatically preferred.  Mr JM  22:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Lieutenant Marvels'' or ''Lieutenants Marvel''
Talk:R v Latimer

message: Regarding this edit, I didn't like the statement that the the judgment was anonymously written because that suggests that the writer might have been anyone in the world (cf. the novel Primary Colors). My understanding is that judgments attributed to "The Court" are the product of true collaboration between several judges (although not necessarily all of them), such that they felt it would be unfair for any one of them to be listed as the judgment's author. I'm not sure if there's a concise way of getting that idea across in the article. --Mathew5000 12:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair. It might be worth linking it to Per curiam decision. However, I'm not so sure the Court attributes deicisions to "The Court" in order to be "fair". For example, in the Mugesera v. Canada decision was literally attributed to every judge. They could always do that, if they wanted to be fair. Also, I've also heard that often per curiam decisions are actually written by single judges. The word has it that the Secession Reference was mostly written by Binnie. Instead, I believe "The Court" is typically reserved for the most controverisal cases, both because they do not want an inidividual judge to wear it and because they want to give the decision the full authority possible. Anyway, I'm not disagreeing with any changes. That's just my two cents. --PullUpYourSocks 12:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "anonymously written"
Talk:Coast Mountain Bus Company

message: I'm a bit confused about the Community Shuttle fleet here. There are some units that are operated by First Transit and are shown here, and there are others that aren't. For example, 17501–17569 are a 50/50 split between being operated by CMBC and First Transit. 17501–17548 are oeprated by CMBC and 17549–17569 are operared by First Transit. All the units from this particular batch are shown, regardless if they're operated by CMBC or not. Yet units like S1321, S1322–S1325 that are operated by First Transit aren't even shown here.So should we include the other units that are operated by First Transit, as the units themselves are owned by TransLink, or should we remove all units because they aren't operated and maintained by CMBC. —Saltn'Pepper (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 17501-17505 aren't operated by CMBC. They are WVMT Arboc units. I do think First Transit units should be shown here. RealBuizel10 (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community Shuttle fleet
Talk:MSR

message: *MSR is a redirect to Mountain Safety Research one of several entries on the dab page. I'm not sure that any of these is clearly the most common use so the dab replacing the redirect seems like the best choice.  It does not look like any of the links to MSR are for Mountain Safety Research.  Vegaswikian 06:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
* Oppose. This is fairly standard. The reason for this is that the assumption is that most people who type in MSR are going to want Mountain Safety Research. Thus, MSR redirects to there and for those others who didn't want that page can go to the dab page. Blackcap (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Moved

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
* Oppose. This is fairly standard. The reason for this is that the assumption is that most people who type in MSR are going to want Mountain Safety Research. Thus, MSR redirects to there and for those others who didn't want that page can go to the dab page. Blackcap (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: Blackcap's comments do not add any value.  What is the reason for assuming that people typing MSR are looking for Moutain Safety Research? Tedernst | talk 21:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Result

message: Why did this change? Everything seems to say that it should not be... I realy think that it should redirect to Mountain Saftey Research again... Leif902 15:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Happened
Talk:Ambrosia Software

message: Should probably be noted if it does not come back up.
50.245.47.84 (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They released an update for Snapz Pro in October 2016, which suggests that at least someone is still working there. (Though it does seem like they're no longer really in business.) Staecker (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems to not exist anymore 

message: Request removed (i.e. declined). Premature. Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, 3O requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. If other editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made here. Just a passing comment: Most disputes of this kind are resolved by reference to reliable sources as defined by Wikipedia. Analysis and comparison of the games by your own inspection are generally prohibited by the SYNTHESIS policy, though more discussion is needed to determine whether or not that's the case here. — TransporterMan (TALK) 23:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion

message: * Richard Moss (2023) "Shareware Heroes" (book)
DFlhb (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional source
Category talk:High schools

message: Does there really need to be all that "stuff" in this Category? (Portal, Feature article, Featured photo, Showcase articles, "Did you know?")  I thought that's what articles were for. I was frustrated when I just wanted to click through here to the appropriate sub-category...--Bookandcoffee 07:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If no one knows why it is here, then I think we can remove it. I will just put the standard link in. -- Fplay 06:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Why are there three subcategories listed, then an H, and then under the H is list of high school shootings. Why is only one subcategory under a letter.
GameOfAwesome (talk) 01:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategories
Talk:USWeb

message: The Wired News story is only available via Google cache. --Michael Snow 07:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stashed-n-cached

message: I moved this article to match the title of the companies it later became to avoid confusion.  There is another USWeb on the internet which is not the same company as listed here.  I made the title more specific to this company in this article which is a defunct bankrupt company. Octoberwoodland (talk) 05:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Companies - USWeb - Page Move

message: I just reverted edits which blank huge sections of the article and are uncited.  The edits appear to be from someone with a COI. 75.169.226.147 (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article blanking, addition of unsourced content
Talk:42nd National Hockey League All-Star Game

message: Why was Linden number 17?
Or is this an error? Marcus1060 04:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He indeed wore #17, I've seen photos of him wearing it. I would assume that someone was wearing #16, however that roster doesn't have anyone. But it is not an error. Linden did not wear his traditional #16 in that game. Kaiser matias 09:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Voiced alveolo-palatal fricative

message: I think it was the worst of potential examples for [ʑː] in Russian: 
Language	Language	Word 	IPA           	Meaning	Notes
Russian 	Russian 	жжёшь	align="center"	       	
so I replace it. (I'm a native speaker of Russian.) Although for some other cases of orthographic жж or зж I can accept both pronunciations: [ʑː] and [ʐː], for this word I accept only [ʐːoʂ].--Imz 23:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian жжёшь 

message: I really don't think that 'ajut' sounds [əʑut], but [əʒut]. I find difficult to articulate de 'u' after that [ʑ], being easier (and the common way, I think) a [ʒ]. Willing to know somebody's opinion about this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MDYarma (talk • contribs) 15:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This sort of thing is brought up from time to time.  The distinction between  and  is subtle and native speakers of English and Catalan can't perceive it.  Sources on Catalan say that Catalan postalveolars are alveolo-palatal rather than palato-alveolar.  See Catalan phonology.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 18:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I begin to think both Recasens and you had a phoniatric problem... Perique des Palottes (talk) 07:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Only when I speak Catalan.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 18:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So, do you speak Catalan with Chinese accent? Please.161.116.236.28 (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I speak Catalan with an American accent.  Luckily, I'm not basing anything on my own pronunciation of Catalan.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 17:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Which might be why you insist in redoing errors in orthography and phonetics of Catalan examples. Still waiting from you the exact reference showing Catalan postalveolars (Carbonell and Llisterri, JIPA, 1992) are any different to the ones in the neighbouring languages. Perique des Palottes (talk) 08:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure which errors in orthography you speak of, but the phonetic issue is not one that I can address in the immediate future unless someone else can get access to the relevant article.  I personally cannot and can only glean from it what others citing it say.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 08:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can access those cited articles and still cannot see why these Catalan sounds should be any different from the Italian ones (as in sciopero = strike), and instead be like the Chinese ones (as in xīngqīliù = 'saturday'). Any native Catalan speaker in contact with Chinese speakers can notice the difference.Perique des Palottes (talk) 10:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalan ''ajut'' 

message: As a native speaker I'd say that's rather [ˈʑrɛbʲɛ] than what's written in the article. It's like this cause nasals loose their features in the word coda. Beside what I've written they're more like [ɛ̃w̃] (of course when they don't assimilate).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.178.99 (talk) 14:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish
Talk:Gorf

message: Hey, I worked damned hard on that GameBoy Advance conversion of GORF, and I don't appreciate its deletion from this page.  It may not have been officially licensed from Midway, but the arcade game's existence was legally questionable thanks to all the content it borrowed from Space Invaders and Galaxian.  If that's going to be your criteria for removing entries you might as well take the whole page down.  You guys talk a big game about being "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit," but that slogan is meaningless when tight-sphinctered admins can swoop in and change everything back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.Neko (talk • contribs) 02:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's a problem with that article, please go there and fix it or propose it for deletion if you think it isn't notable enough for and article.  However, "licensing" is not what defines something as being important enough to include in an article; generally, it has to do with coverage in independent, reliable sources.  Qwyrxian (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typical Wikipedia 

message: AFAIK, Gorf was the first multi-mission game, but the article does not list this among its firsts. Was there another before it? ProhibitOnions (T) 15:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know.  What other video games use various missions? — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another first: Multi-mission game

message: Does it need to be included that Gorf is frog spelt backwards? I'm going to delete it.Pengwiin 11:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frog spelt backwards
Talk:Food 4 Less, Foods Co.

message: Good job keeping up on what's happend to Food 4 Less in Utah! :)
thanks to whoever overwrote the extensive article that was here with this one single sentence. :(
:The page got deleted. --Caldorwards4 19:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any explanation why it got deleted?  I don't recall a discussion and I can't find it on the list of recent deletions to argue for a restoration.  There was, imo, a lot of good info there that detailed what's going on with Food-4-Less. RexTraverse 03:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I live north of L.A and there is a Food 4 Less a couple miles from where I live and  Foods Co. in the next town.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdrgz25 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations 

message: to Foodmaxx?--Hotshot334 (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Autokinesis

message: I cleaned up the page quite a bit, so hopefully it's up to par, though I would still like a few other people to take a look at it, just to be sure it complies to the standards.--Hotchy 07:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Cleanup and Editiing 

message: Although this article was started a little before Autokinetic effect I think the latter is more complete. The only nonredundant information is the instructions to pilots, but these really belong elsewhere. What do you think? Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Autokinetic effect?
Talk:Sperrins

message: I'm not happy with the description of the location of the Sperrin mountains as it is actual more a description of the Sperrin AONB. Not sure if the following is any better but I wanted other inputs before changing the main body. Comments and amendments please.
The Sperrins or Sperrin Mountains () are a range of hills in Northern Ireland and one of the largest upland areas in Ireland. The range stretches the countries of Tyrone and Londonderry from south of Strabane eastwards to Maghera and north towards Limavady. The region has a population of some 150,000 and is a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Sorry didn't sign this back on 19 Jan. Bjmullan (talk) 16:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of range