Talk:La Bolduc

message: What was "in their regional dialect" supposed to mean? Quebecois is french.
There seems to be alot of Quebec Nationlist overtones in this article.  The cultural rupture between French Canadiens  did not happen until the quiet revolution.  Québecois was not as identified until after that point.
:Not sure what you're getting at here - but Gaspe has a very different dialect from much of the rest of Quebec.  The rest of it is hard to address without more details on what you find objectionable. WilyD 20:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whatever WP:REDLINK exactly says, the article is full of non helpful and distractive red links and the Cleanup Red Link tag is the closest tag to address this. Removing maintenance tags without fixing the issue constitutes vandalism. I say it again, a maintenance tag up top is a fair compromise and not doing any harm. That tag had been there since February, why does suddenly WilyD want it off. SlightSmile 14:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Having stumbled upon this discussion, I'm inclined to agree with Slightsmile (mostly). On one hand, red links are supposed to encourage new articles, but on the other, there should be a limit where we expect and want to encourage writing new articles, thus some kind of editorial decision is called for. In this case, most red links are to songs written by Bolduc in 1920 s or of folk origin, unlikely to satisfy WP:N. Our song/album articles for most of less renowned performers are generally stubby and of low quality, and I doubt we expect those articles any time soon, so I'd vote for red link removal. Should anyone want to write these articles, he can always come back and re-link them. On the other hand, about half of red links (Mary Travers Park, Jean Grimaldi, Théâtre Arlequin de Québec) does look promising, so they should stay in. Of course, I'm not familiar with the topic, someone else should make that decision. In the meantime, edit-warring with cleanup tags is quite unhelpful. Make an agreement about which redlinks should stay, and stick to it, don't deface the reasonable article with ugly tags. No such user (talk) 10:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: NSU thanks for the voice of reason. I agree the tag isn't the prettiest but I still say is unreasonable to remove before the issue is fixed. I usually fix issues myself but once in a blue moon for various reasons I tag it. A user tried to remove some red links a few days ago and WilyD reverted. When I reverted WilyD on that, he started insisting on removing the maintenance tag. Why? Also WilyD, no I don't have to back words with action and create an article for each of those reds. And I'm not going to argue about each of the many red links. I think we're hitting a wall here and time for dispute resolution starting with 3O. SlightSmile 15:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  So many inappropriate red links 

message: I spent a considerable amount of time doing cleanup on this article related to redlinks and references.  I've restored my edits since someone chose to remove my work, it looks like it was done manually to avoid revert guidelines regarding reverting good-faith actions of other editors. H:REV, WP:ROWN
Also added reference tag as the overwhelming majority of the articles citations rely on .
David Condrey (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate revert 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on La Bolduc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110706165109/http://avtrust.ca/masterworks/2002/en_soundrecording_1.htm to http://avtrust.ca/masterworks/2002/en_soundrecording_1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Bolduc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040203192815/http://www.histori.ca/minutes/minute.do?ID=10209&sl=e to http://www.histori.ca/minutes/minute.do?ID=10209&sl=e
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Bolduc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070117141329/http://www.collectionscanada.ca/women/002026-210-e.html to http://www.collectionscanada.ca/women/002026-210-e.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified