lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blawith and Subberthwaite

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Blencow

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Blenkinsopp Castle

message: This is about Blenkinsopp Castle, so why is the title spelt Blenkinsop? I can't edit the page name, of course. Thanks, Alison Blenkinsop Fit2Bust (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a bit peculiar. I've moved the page to the pp spelling which is used in the actual article. It can be spelt either way, but using both in the article was a bit confusing. Nev1 (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of this page is incorrect 
Talk:Blennerhasset and Torpenhow

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: In this edit,  asked for clarification of 
*The local pronunciation of Torpenhow is , rather than the more intuitive 
What clarification would be helpful? --Northernhenge (talk) 21:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Blewbury

message: I would propose to create a seperate article to describe the iron age hill fort, shown as Blewburton Hill on OS Maps Pahazzard (talk) 22:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Tmol42 (talk) 23:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Having cleaned up the Notable People section, with inline citations to verify that the people in the section had in fact lived in Blewbury, there remain two unreferenced notable people:
*John Revel 
I can find no information as to who John Revel is, and he has remained unreferenced in the section for at least 5 years (citation needed tag is from 2015).
*Michael Martin-Harvey (presumed to be Michael Martin-Harvey)
As far as I can tell, there are no sources saying Michael Martin-Harvey lived in Blewbury. He has remained unreferenced for at least 3 years (citation needed tag is from 2017).
Given there are no sources confirming either John or Michael lived in Blewbury, and that this issue hasn't been fixed over the last 5 or 3 years respectively, I have concluded that either the information is incorrect, unclear or not of sufficient notability to be included.
Clearly if they warranted inclusion in the article, the issue would have been fixed and references added, as there has been sufficient time for this to happen.
I have decided, therefore, to remove both from this section.
If you have reliable sources indicating either of them lived in Blewbury, and believe they are of importance to Blewbury's history, please do feel free to re-add them, provided you cite a reliable source. Thanks!
Mxtt.prior (talk) 09:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People clean-up
Talk:Trimerophytopsida

message: Because the classification of early land plants is in such a flux at present, it's not clear what rank to choose for the title of the article. Checking what has been done for groups considered at the same level as the trimerophytes, namely the rhyniophytes and the zosterophylls, it seems that Division Tracheophyta, Class Trimerophytopsida is the most consistent and fits best with other taxonomic hierarchies.
The exact name is also an issue. The modern understanding of the trimerophytes comes from Banks (1975). He established the group as a subdivision with the name Trimerophytina, based on the genus Trimerophyton. Note that he did not use the name Trimerophytophytina. Article 16.4 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) allows the "phyton" part of a genus name optionally to be omitted before "-ophyta", "-ophytina" and "-opsida". Precedent does not operate above family level, so Banks does not have to be followed exactly, but if the group is to be treated as a class the name "Trimeropsida" would be most consistent. However, a check of both Google and Google Scholar shows that "Trimerophytopsida" is much more commonly used than "Trimeropsida", so this is the name I've chosen. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:Blindbothel

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Blindcrake

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Blo' Norton

message: The first paragraph of Early History is a bit repetitive 92.21.97.170 (talk) 18:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of repetition
Talk:Blue John Cavern

message: Some of the information here (particularly the paragraph about similar minerals from around the world, but also some of the information about the etymology) would seem to sit better in the section on Blue John in the Fluorite article, as it's not particularly about the Blue John Cavern. If Blue John (the mineral) had its own article, I'd definitely split out some of the material. What do others think? Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just read this article, and at the end (before I read the above comment) I thought to myself that it didn't really say very much about the cavern, but instead gave a fair bit of detail about Blue John. Hence although I'm coming at it from the opposite direction, I'm inclined to agree with the above - ie streamline some of the detail about Blue John, and preferably also expand info about the actual cavern. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and created a new article in place of the existing Derbyshire Blue John article (which previously redirected to the relevant section of the Fluorite article), combining material from that article with the material from here that applied to the mineral rather than the cave. Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Crossover with [[Fluorite#Blue John]]

message: Nobody seems to know that this cave is the protagonist of a terror tale by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "The Terror of Blue John Gap" (1912)? I am not a native English, but some English-speaker should add this to the text. By the way, the tale has its own entry on Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.15.56 (talk) 16:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add a mention to the Derbyshire Blue John article I've created (see above). Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ''The Terror of Blue John Gap''
Talk:Bluestone Heath Road

message: Im not sure that the description of the route is entirely accurate. The article states that it starts at Candleford and runs towards Caistor, and from looking at the map this seems to be correct, especially since it names that road (the A16) as Bluestone Heath Road. However it is at the closest point a good 3 miles from Tetford, so this is quite confusing...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.76.74.189 (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Acle railway station

message: Is this really a stub?--Brunnian (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: With Prose size (text only): 982 B (177 words) "readable prose size" and no inline citations, this is a stub class article,--Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Bluntisham

message: Undertook a major edit 01/06/2013-02/06/2013, added many more citations and split page into appropriate sections. Also added more about history, churches and notable residents. Will add some more information about local buildings over the next couple of days, and some info from books about the area next time I am in Cambridgeshire (likely to be later this month). Please add more information (from reliable sources) if you have it, or if you don't have a citation add to the talk page or tag it and I will try to help. Supervegan (talk) 01:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit 
Talk:Sir Charles

message: Charles Barkley is the one notable person who's most known, on a contemporary basis at least, by this nickname.  That said, I've also included a disambiguation link to the Charles given name page on top of the Charles Barkley page for those who may have typed in "Sir Charles" on the search engine in the hopes of finding other noblemen with the given name "Charles".  Amchow78 01:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are other uses, not knights nor noblemen, and Barkley is now decades out of play. -- 65.92.246.246 (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Noblemen with this title are baronets, (knights are not proper nobility), so DRAFT: Baronet Sir Charles -- 65.92.246.246 (talk) 08:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to Charles Barkley page
Talk:Boarstall Duck Decoy

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I first make an edit of a page, please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Boarstall Tower

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Nathan Pritikin

message: Anyone interested in helping to expand this article can find virtually everything there is to know about Pritikin at UCLA's site of archived documents: Nathan Pritikin papers - Online Archive California.  It's a bit tricky to figure out how to use it.  There are link selections on the left hand side that bring up various classifications of papers.  It seems you have to do a search for something that would likely be in the paper (e.g. "Nathan" or "Pritikin") to see the content of the paper. OccamzRazor 00:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resource for expanding the article

message: Nathan Pritikin's profound influence on nutritional practices and scientific study of nutrition and heart diesase is extremely well documented and continues beyond his death.  He truly is deserving of a comprehensive biographical article on wikipedia.  Unfortunately, I don't know much about him and only today learned that he was not a physician.  It is my hope that people who are familiar with his history will contribute to this article.  Thank you.  OccamzRazor 01:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deserving of an article

message: I have received an email that there there is WP:OR on this article. This line is fictional as neither two sources listed say this:
"After being diagnosed with ischemic posterior wall heart disease in 1957 via an abnormal ECG and stress test combined with elevated cholesterol. These are the two sources listed for the above quote".
, 
On further investigation, only one source describes a diagnosis
"The physicians point out that in February, 1958, Pritikin was diagnosed as having coronary artery insufficiency (without symptoms) secondary to an exercise electrocardiogram."
 
Pritikin wasn't diagnosed with atherosclerosis. Coronary artery insufficiency is when there is inadequate blood flow through the coronary arteries. Psychologist Guy (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research on the article
Talk:Philipp Ludwig, Count Palatine of Neuburg

message: As a review of the German Wikipedia pages and secondary literature will reveal, these rulers were actually "Dukes of Palatinate Neuburg." In addition they bore the title of "Count Palatine" from their descent from the Rhenish line of the Wittelsbach family. However, they were not the "Counts" of Neuburg, as that territory was a duchy. Because of this, I suggest we should revise the nomenclature to "Dukes of Palatinate Neuburg" in keeping with they German Wikipedia pages. Gamonetus (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Duke" not "Count Palatine" of Palatinate-Neuburg
Talk:Boddington, Northamptonshire

message: The article includes in its references "local residents" which would indicate that imformation being provided is through original research. -- Whpq (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: Would someone please check the data that goes with this quotation:
:"According to the 2001 census it had a population of 700,[1] 240 male, 252 female in 196 households"
That's an awful lot of invisible people. --Oldontarian (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Bodiam

message: The name Bodiam derives from the Welsh word 'bod,' a dwelling, combined with the Saxon 'ham,' meaning village.
 
The unsourced attribution of the place name to a Welsh word seems dubious. Wbkelley (talk) 03:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree so I have removed it. I found some other origins - Bodan Hamm (Bodan's water meadow) , Boda's homestead  or Bodas farm  but none of these are really an authoritative source MortimerCat (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I notice that the excerpt from the licence to crenellate in the page on Bodiam Castle refers to the manor of "Bodiam fat man, by the sea".  Now that might be vandalism, but if not, that's a weird name for a village in its own right... 82.1.7.156 (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name
Talk:Bodilly

message: A previous version of this article said:
:The Manor House [Bodilly Veor] has been subject of various paranormal investigations by The Ghost Club over many years and has regular ghost hunting evenings.
The Ghost Club's website does not list Bodilly Veor (http://www.ghostclub.org.uk/gc_invest_main.htm), but it's an incomplete list since the Club has been operating since 1862.
Somebody with more info on this subject -- especially a citation! -- should add it in.
—Molly-in-md (talk) 20:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Club investigations at Bodilly Veor?
Talk:Confederate Memorial Park (Albany, Georgia)

message: This park is located in Dougherty County, not the City of Albany.  If you click on the parcel from the county's map viewer, the Jurisdiction says Dougherty County. http://gisserv.dougherty.ga.us/
The park is not listed on the City's list of parks here http://www.albany.ga.us/content/1798/2879/117101/117219.aspx
The park is not listed on the County's list of parks here http://www.albany.ga.us/content/1800/143202/167453.aspx
But, as it is physically not located in the city, I believe this article should be changed to reflect that the park is located in Dougherty County, not Albany.  --Mjrmtg (talk) 22:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipality
Talk:Bold, St Helens

message: Under the paragraph on the Rainhill Trials railway celebrations, we should mention that 'Robert' - one of Bold Colliery's own steam locomotives - took part in the cavalcade out on the main line Andywebby (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Robert' - Bold Colliery's steam locomotive and the Rainhill trials
Talk:Bolney

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Colwood, West Sussex  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 06:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Addiewell railway station

message: Yes, but I remember standing on the bridge in West Calder as the steam trains bellowed and spit their path underneath. The Addiewell station became an isolated platform in the 1970s. Arrivng from Edinburgh was quite a surprise in the snowy winters, requiring a significant trek through drifts of several feet up the hill to Addiebrownhill then Loganlea.
This diary style comment by IP address removed from article by Britmax (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Bolton, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Bootle, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:58, 02 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Viburnum plicatum

message: This term refers to a particular group of cultivars with globular flowerheads, rather than the species itself. Darorcilmir (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese snowball bush
Talk:Boraston

message: How is 'town' defined? Kidderminster, 17 miles distant from Boraston, is called the nearest town in this article but a glance at the map shows Ludlow would surely be nearer?Cloptonson (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Nearest Town - surely Ludlow not Kidderminster?
Talk:Macalester College Observatory

message: Added information to infobar. Planning on expanding article in near future. Jacotto 02:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the update Friedlad, but the Macalester Observatory's telescope is still the largest in the state that is capable of scientific research; the Concordia observatory page states that it does not currently posses a CCD camera, which would make the Newtonian Reflector unsuitable for scientific work. If Concordia does obtain a CCD camera for the 18" telescope, then we can absolutely shift the title of 'largest in state' to Concordia. I will try to make a clarification in the article, however. Jacotto (talk) 22:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes
Talk:Precious metals refining

message: This article is horrible.  The last section (The companies from this business) makes absolutely no sense at all; one wouldn't know where to begin to copyedit it.  The second section (Products) is little better.  Should this article be deleted via AFD?  Or merged?  If anyone reads this, please weigh in. N2e (talk) 01:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the two paragraphs that were over 90% obtuse.  The remaining paragraph has some more useful information that is unique to precious metals refining.  Perhaps we should consider merging this info into the main Refining (metallurgy) article. N2e (talk) 19:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article redeemable?

message: Based on the consensus that the merge is appropriate, I will set out to complete the merge today.  I'm going off to get advice from the WP:MERGE page.  N2e (talk) 17:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge is now complete. N2e (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge is now complete
Talk:Albrighton railway station

message: I was always under the impression that Albrighton, along with all the other stations on the line, were part of the Western Region (as a former GWR station).  It certainly ran to the WR's Wolverhampton Low Level rather than the LMR's High Level prior to 1968.  19:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: London Midland Region?
Talk:Botcherby

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Bothel and Threapland

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Bothel, Cumbria

message: Is this village at all notable? With the dubious statements such as "People fight there", I'm tempted to nominate for deletion. Labrat256 23:07, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The AfD discussion for the article was a unanimous "keep", except for the nomination. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Andrew Dessler

message: I am working on a rewrite of this article at User:MrBill3/sandbox/Andrew Dessler. I am not looking to do anything drastic but reformat a little and add references. I will expand as information from references I find warrants.  - - MrBill3 (talk) 11:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite being worked on 

message: The article currently states, "He asserted his confidence that the climate is warming due to human activity and that this will have 'catastrophic impacts'". This is sourced to Environment News Service. Dessler himself has presented a more clear explanation (essentially there is a real risk of catastrophic impacts) in a YouTube video, here. As this is the subject himself expressing his own opinion the current content should probably be qualified or clarified. - - MrBill3 (talk) 00:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confidence in catastrophic impacts vs real risk 

message: In 2018, I was selected as a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.  https://today.tamu.edu/2017/11/22/andrew-dessler-named-a-fellow-in-aaas/ You may want to add that to my awards & honors list.  Thanks, Andrew Dessler  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.24.35.45 (talk) 03:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  new award 