lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Cassidy (magician)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
* The article John Cassidy (magician) was originally moved to John Cassidy on 31 March 2006 because at the time there was only one person with this name in English Wikipedia . Since than a second John Cassidy (artist) has been added to Wikipedia by me. There is also a third requested page for John Cassidy (baseball player). It does not appear to me from reading the articles that one of these people is more notable that any other. I therefore suggest the following moves. -- Patleahy 23:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support Makes perfect sense per WP:DAB and eliminates confusion. –Pomte 07:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: Add any additional comments
* John Cassidy is also a staff writer for the The New Yorker and a published author. This name was incorrectly linked to John Cassidy (i.e. the magician) on Grover Norquist. I changed the link to John Cassidy (journalist)  -- Patleahy 23:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Death of a Monk

message: I didn't find a suitable category fot GLBT's literature. Therefore I put the article in the :Category:LGBT. is there any precise category? Thanks, Danny-w 20:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a GLBT literature category 
Talk:John Davy Hayward

message: There's a d.o.b but no d.o.d. Valetude (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: He died in 1965 but I'm having trouble finding the month and day of death. I cannot access this: Obituary of Hayward in King's College Annual Report, Cambridge, 1965, pages 30–33. WikiParker (talk) 11:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death?
Talk:Report

message: — Assignment last updated by Savmanbanans (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Technical and Professional Communication

message: Talk page was full of topics unrelated to the article. Usrbodie (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unrelated comments. 

message: Write about report 105.113.40.20 (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technically English
Talk:John Edmonstone

message: This is clearly political correctness at work, and it is mentioned in the main Charles Darwin article.
Even if he did learn some things from this man, it should be noted that in some of Darwin's works, he describes not only Africans but also Australian Aboriginals and American Indians as 'savages'. By today's standards, that would qualify as 'hate speech'.--X sprainpraxisL (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of '100 Great Black Britons' 
Talk:John Elliott Cairnes

message: This article reads like it was lifted directly from an old bio maybe the DNB with no citation. Cairnes, in any case, is no classical economist. He's opposed to the idea of providence or that this is the best of all possible worlds, and the French idea of interest, hence of both free markets and republicanism, likening Bastiat to the despised Rousseau and Paine, and all those who speak of natural rights, which is actually quite opposed to interest, and misses the entire point of static theory or long-run economic analysis, much as George III, Paley.  In other words he, like others of his school, past and future, is what he decries, a mercantilist, and a progressive. Mercantilists, as well as assuming virtue, cannot resolve labor value and exchange value into one idea. This is Cairnes' problem, but which he imputes to Bastiat. Bastiat uses the word service, or at least his English translator does, in a feudal sense, much as Smith in TMS, and it is an exchange as much as labor situation.  It means doing what the other wants. What Bastiat and all other republicans want to say is that an economy is most efficient when the demands of all AND the means of all are reconciled, which is what Cairnes wants, but refuses to let providence see to. He considers it both Communism, AND illiberal, justifying, for instance, Irish land tenure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.26.8 (talk) 06:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarized? 
Talk:ChibiChibi/Cosmos archive

message: :Historical note: This article was called Sailor Cosmos, and was ranked B class on the assessment scale for WikiProject Anime and manga.
__TOC__
* The image on this page is obviously not a screencap. Can someone fix the copyright info so that it is correct and legal? strideranne 23:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I've changed it to Character Artwork instead; I hope that's the correct tag to use. - Gemtiger 18:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Against It is difficult to merge with Chibichibi because of the background involved and pictures as well, to do it the latter article would have to be reformated to accomidate the former, which will be difficult and confusing.--Hitsuji Kinno 20:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You should be replying at the location of the current discussion, not the old one. And no, the former merge proposal was to list ChibiChibi under Sailor Cosmos, which doesn't worked for the reasons explained at the current discussion. -Masamage 03:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: It's actually Sailor Ceres who asks Cosmos if she is the future Sailor Moon. The Quartet member drawn is wearing a large bow, the hair tendrils create two circles before extending downwards, and the bangs are puffy and curly; that is the physical appearance of Ceres. mochi 14:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. --Masamage 22:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed Sailor Pallas to Sailor Ceres
Talk:John F. Parrott

message: * Biographical Directory of the United States Congress - http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=P000084
*       "          "        "      "      "       "   , "Guide to Research" - http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/guidedisplay.pl?index=P000084
* "The Parrott family of Parrott gun fame"  (No citations, though) - http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~parrott/Parrott%20Gun.shtml
 
* John Fabyan House - http://www.antiquing.com/realestate/fabyan/
* New Hampshire Historical Society e-Newsletter, "Preserved & On Display" (another JFP portrait) - http://www.nhhistory.org/eimages/enewsjun108.html
* Strafford County, New Hampshire, "Strafford County Registry of Deeds" - http://www.usgennet.org/usa/nh/county/strafford1/deeds192-3.htm
* Ballotpedia - http://ballotpedia.org/List_of_United_States_Representatives_from_New_Hampshire#tab=1800s
        "     - http://ballotpedia.org/Template:NewHampshirehistoricalUSreps
        "     - http://ballotpedia.org/United_States_congressional_delegations_from_New_Hampshire
Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 08:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional citations. 
Talk:John Felton (assassin)

message: This is a very one-sided article. Particularly in how it portrays Buckingham as a complete failure. The language is also very emotive and not very objective. Phrases like "the King trusted Buckingham" are stated as objective facts despite being subjective assessments. 49.142.108.46 (talk) 06:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the "bias." The strong consensus of historians is that the King strongly trusted Buckingham, and it's what historians call a  "fact" that shaped decisions and events--it is not "subjective" Rjensen (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Wilmot Mountain

message: I see Wilmot has been at it again, removing the unbiased information and history and adding commercial messages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.122.6 (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It may not be intentional, but the neutral point of view still has to be kept.  There's also not much in the way of sourcing here - there's a link to the Kenosha History Center but there doesn't seem to be a connection to Wilmot at first glance.  Someone must have written about why the locals think it's a garbage dump, or investigated it - maybe a local paper.  ColourBurst 04:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Econophysics/Econophysics

message: ===Notes===
===Bibliography===
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
: In my opinion, it is at first necessary to review the History part of the current article. The relationship between Economics and hard sciences, especially Physics, is not new at all. This is well explained in the book by Ingrao and Israel referenced in the present article. It will be necessary to point to the pages of Walras and Vilfredo Pareto and to point to or, at least as stubs, include some articles on Condorcet, Cournot and other French thinkers/mathematicians who inspired both Walras and Pareto. Maybe some revision of those pages will be necessary as well. Jumping from the end of the XIXth Century to 1994, when H. Eugene Stanley coined the term Econophysics is perhaps too much. However, in between, there has been a real separation of  Economics from Physics and other hard sciences. For this reason, ideas from statistical physics developed by James Clerk Maxwell and Boltzmann never really entered the Economics mainstream. It might be useful to quote Jan Tinbergen's thesis on equilibrium in Physics and Economics. Tinbergen was a student of Paul Ehrenfest and as such, he was exposed to the theories of statistical equilibrium, but they are not mentioned in his thesis. Escalas 11:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
: In my opinion, it is at first necessary to review the History part of the current article. The relationship between Economics and hard sciences, especially Physics, is not new at all. This is well explained in the book by Ingrao and Israel referenced in the present article. It will be necessary to point to the pages of Walras and Vilfredo Pareto and to point to or, at least as stubs, include some articles on Condorcet, Cournot and other French thinkers/mathematicians who inspired both Walras and Pareto. Maybe some revision of those pages will be necessary as well. Jumping from the end of the XIXth Century to 1994, when H. Eugene Stanley coined the term Econophysics is perhaps too much. However, in between, there has been a real separation of  Economics from Physics and other hard sciences. For this reason, ideas from statistical physics developed by James Clerk Maxwell and Boltzmann never really entered the Economics mainstream. It might be useful to quote Jan Tinbergen's thesis on equilibrium in Physics and Economics. Tinbergen was a student of Paul Ehrenfest and as such, he was exposed to the theories of statistical equilibrium, but they are not mentioned in his thesis. Escalas 11:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:John Gibson Lockhart

message: I've found some indication that he married the daughter of Walter Scott. If true, it should be obvious enough from references that it should be mentioned in the article (would certainly explain his access to sources). But it isn't mentioned. Help? --Alvestrand (talk) 22:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he marry Walter Scott's daughter? 
Talk:John Gow

message: The Spotlight fellows did a great job, thanks to everyone.  Only thing I changed was to re-identify Daniel DeFoe as Charles Johnson.  According to David Cordingly, Under the Black Flag, the long-standing belief that Charles Johnson was a pseudonym for DeFoe has been refuted, though Johnson's actual identity remains mysterious. Pirate Dan 20:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Johnson 
Talk:Partitas for keyboard (Bach)

message: I deleted "orchestral suites" from being incorporated with Bach sets in six parts, as there are only 4 orchestral suites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.216.252 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please clarify this statement: "This intention is further signalled by the spread of keys, which follows a clear structure, B-Flat - c, a - D, G - e, leaving F as the logical conclusion." What is the structure, please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnOFL (talk • contribs) 21:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, the structure is, starting on B-flat: up a note (B-flat to C), down a note (B-flat to A), up a second note (B-flat to D), down a second note (B-flat to G), up a third note (B-flat to E). If you look at the table below, Partitas 1, 2, 4, 6 have stepwise motion upwards (B-flat, c, D, e), and Partitas 1, 3, 5 have stepwise motion downwards (B-flat, a, G). It seems to me that the natural next step after Partita 5 would be F minor, though the article said the opposite, that it would be F major, the key of the Italian Concerto.  — Eru·tuon 06:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure of keys

message: I've found a fairly decent citation for this. I take no credit for this, it was very easy to find. I'm surprised that whoever originally slapped the CN tag in there didn't just go find it. It shows something that is my pet peeve about CN tags: very often they seem to be nothing but sheer laziness.
Poihths (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed the CN tag on the "German Suites" title 

message: Just listening to Piotr Anderszewski gracefully playing the German partitas on -- what sounds like -- a large grand piano.  Would someone like to add a few notes about the academic discussion that rages about Bach who wrote for a harpsichord being played on a modern piano that didn't exist in his time?  At least, when played on a guitar, the performance is recognized as an "arrangement" of Bach's original harpsichord composition.  When played on a piano, the performance manages to avoid the subject.75.110.98.103 (talk) 18:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Recordings
Talk:Intimate Stories

message: A BENEPLACITO IN ILLO TEMPORE CAURUS ANIMUS DOMINI ETIANDUM CÆSARIANORUM OCTAVIUS ARCESSITUS ALEA IACTA EST A FORTIORI IUS EST ARS ET ÆQUI TAPHIS GRASSATUS IUSTINIANUS EST.
“RATIONE AD IFINITUM ADFORE METALLA AD REM MONOTROPHUS LAUS DEO”
“ALEA JACTA EST OCTAVIUS IN MEMORIAN GARDIAN EST. DESPONSATIONIS ET CARPE DIAM. AGENDA EGRESSIO CRASTINO.”
“AGENDA PERENDIE ET PERENDINUM FORTIORI EST.”
“A FORTIORI ALEA IACTA EST.”
“TAPHIS GRASSATUS EST.”
“ALIS VOLAT PROPRIIS.”
CÆSARIANORUM OCTAVIUS PROCECUTUM IUSTINIANUS PROCESTRIUM CUBICULUM.
“CENATURIE CANACULUM ET CARPE.”
“CARPENT TUA POMA NEPOTES IUSTINIANUS.”
IN ILLO TEMPORE…
“PACTIO UMUS TULUM NEC TULLIUS ET TUM TEMPORIS ERAT PAX ET PACO PAPILA ERAT SOLUTOS ET NAVIS EAM CIC IMPIDITAS CIC NIMIA APPETITIO ET IMPETUS TUM VER EAM TURIBA ERAT TUMEO CIC ORABIS EC TURARIUS NESCIO QUIS NAUTICAE ARTIS PERITUS ERAT VECTRÆ VECTRA VATE EAT CAUCULARIUM.”
“ALEA JACTA EST. CÆSARIANORUM OCTAVIUS VENI. IN MEMORIAN GARDIAN PACTIO EST.”
IN ILLO TEMPORE  IN DIBIIS LIBERTAS NIHIL OBSTAT ET CÆSARIANORUM OCTAVIUS PRÆCTERVECTUS ROMÆ CONQUIRIS GÆSORUM ET EXPEDITIONIS ORDINATE ORDINATIM RATIONE AD IFINITUM ADFORE METALLA EST.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.153.83 (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lionel Conacher Award

message: Please edit the table such that the Name column is wide enough to ensure there is generally only one line per entry (similar to the Women's Athlete of the year award).  It makes the article much easier to read.  SquashEngineer (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Winners table 

message: 2014 Milos Raonic - isn't he first Canadian to reach a "men's" WTA semi-final?  Wasn't it a "final" (reference 77)?  This is in contradiction to Eugenie's efforts that same year (see Bobbie Rosenfeld Award).  It just seems oddly worded all around.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SquashEngineer (talk • contribs) 18:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Winners 

message: A breakout table of Winners by Sport would be helpful (similar to the Lou Marsh Trophy). SquashEngineer (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winners by Sport
Talk:John J. Raskob

message: Why ther is no mention about his involvement in the Business plot?
:because there's no documented evidence that there was such a plot or that Raskob was involved. But if you have such, edit and add.Richardjames444 (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Raskob intention to bring fascism to US
Talk:John Josiah Guest

message: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography says Guest was defeated by Sir George Warrender, 4th Baronet in 1831. However, article Honiton (UK Parliament constituency) says that Guest and Warrender were the two MPs up to 1831 and Warrender and Henry Baines Lott thereafter. Surely that means that Lott defeated Guest.Cutler 22:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the source for the article Honiton (UK Parliament constituency)? Oxford Dictionary of National Biography must surely be the preferred source here. FunkyCanute (talk) 11:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I don't know if the ODNB article has been secretly edited, but the 2004 version online doesn't make any mention of Warrender (and neither do any of the other available versions). Additionally the Honiton (UK Parliament constituency) refs look sound. I've updated the article to remove the mention of Warrender, which is in line with ODNB and doesn't conflict with the constituency article. Ligaturama (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who beat Guest in 1831 election?
Talk:John Lintner

message: "For NonCorrelated investors LIntner's work was a foundational milestone that has been used to advance this investment disclipline." I'm trying to translate this article to de.wiki. I have difficulties with that sentece: Is NonCorrelatet a magazine? Does it mean Lintners work was only for some investors foundational? --Der-Wir-Ing (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence
Talk:John Mark Ockerbloom

message: The work of this person is interesting. More should be written on him and his Online Books Page. 
--Ludvikus 14:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting person

message: I've removed the "Doctor" in the infobox simply because I don't think it is the standard around here to do this for every Ph.D.  In fact I've never seen it before.  There is no intention here of questioning whether he has a Ph.D., I'm almost certain that he does, just on whether this is the standard format.  Please revert me if I'm wrong.  Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Doctor" in info box 

message: Hi,
I actually am a librarian and I'm also someone who studies "Cluster B" and its prevalence among librarians. There are close to 1100 articles tagged for "American Librarians". I will say - as a librarian - that librarians generally aren't so notable that they should have Wikipedia pages and a lot of these people are I think creating their own Wikipedia pages or pages for their friends & this is really a byproduct of narcissistic tendencies, with narcissism being one of the Cluster B disorders. I recommend going through the pages tagged as "American Librarians" and determining if a lot of these people meet Wikipedia's basic notability guidelines. Most of them probably don't unless they have served as ALA president, ALA executive director, or done things in the field that would make them of interest outside of it. This person is an example of someone who I don't think meets the notability guidelines of having a Wikipedia page. 2600:1700:3BAD:A210:8CA6:FDD:4BC9:4CBD (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "American Librarians" has a lot of people with questionable notability
Talk:Twelve Apostles of Ireland

message: Does anyone else count 14 listed? Two Finnian's have been thrown in there. --71.190.5.212 (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just the twelve leading disciples of Finnian of Clonard count, i.e. Finnian himself is not included. Finnian of Moville is a contemporary of Finnian of Clonard who is not seen as one of his pupils and who consequently does count as one of the Twelve Apostles of Ireland. I do not know why he was included in this list. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are 14 names listed. What's up with that?  Quis separabit? 00:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. 14. I got rid of extra one. Finian should not be separately counted in order to come up with 12. Student7 (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Twelve?

message: The Twelve Apostles of Ireland Challenge is an edition competition seeking to create and improve articles on the Twelve Apostles of Ireland. Anyone in any language can subscribe and collaborate on building or translating articles relating to the Twelve Apostles. Medals and real icons will be rewarded to the winners. To participate, one just needs to subscribe here and start collaborating. Dia Duit! Leefeni de Karik (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twelve Apostles of Ireland Challenge
Talk:John Molson

message: * This article needs to be copy-edited for tone, and it also needs additional references. There are broad paragraphs that are written with statements that go completely unverified. A more encyclopedic approach is necessary. bwmcmaste (talk) 06:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Essay-like

message: Molson is currently placed in the category of Canadian Anglicans (recently moved from Unitarians). His marriage (and funeral) were at the Anglican Christ Church but (acc. Canada's Entrepreneurs: From the Fur Trade to the 1929 Stock Market Crash by John English) at the time the CofE was the only non-RC church that could register weddings. But by 1792, he had contributed to the building of the Scotch Presbyterian Church (St Gabriel Street) and remained an active member "until at least 1815". In 1832, he helped purchase land for an Unitarian chapel.
Given the conflicting evidence he might be better placed in Category:Canadian Protestants.
Nedrutland (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious denomination 

message: Any reason why two of the image captions are in French?  This is English-language Wikipedia after all. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image captions
Talk:Northeast Freeway (Washington, D.C.)

message: The route as laid out on the map doesn't match the description of running in the Pepco right-of-way, nor does it align to the I-95 stub as actually built in anticipation of connecting to the Northeast Freeway (which, as per the description, is aligned to continue south through the Pepco right-of-way.) The mapped route just seems to follow New Hampshire Ave up to the beltway, which was not the intended route.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.133.207.229 (talk) 17:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Map