lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kiss Me Kate (film)

message: "Nearly all of Porter's rather risqué lyrics had to be "cleaned up" to avoid the wrath of the censors, thus dulling much of the comedy and making the results rather bland."
POV, no? 66.252.163.189 (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's pretty much opinion. The Photoplayer 16:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: I converted several British words to their American versions, partly because this is an American film, and partly because the rest of the article uses American spellings.  But I'm undecided on whether to change "theatre" to "theater".  The former is the primary British spelling and the latter is the primary American spelling, but both are used by some people in both countries.
Specifically, here in America, "theatre" is often used to refer to playhouses while "theater" is reserved for moviehouses even though the only official spelling in either case is "theater".  Thus my question is: should I change them all to "theater" since that's the way Americans are "supposed" to spell it, or should I leave it as "theatre" because we usually use that to refer to playhouses which is the context here?  --Kitsunegami (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Theatre" vs "Theater" 

message: The redirect Kiss Me Kate (film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kiss Me Kate (film]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Daffodil International University

message: First of all I am writing here not to promote Daffodil International University but to put the facts about the same in Wikipedia. 
Please go to the link below which reflects the fact that Daffodil International University has achieved the B.I.D. World Quality Commitment Award in Paris. The Link
Also a personal suggestion to recheck the information that is uploaded here in Wikipedia about Daffodil International University as a lot of points are not up to date. Updating those information will surely enrich Wikipedia.
--Shah - Al - Mamun 06:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotion

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official pages of the university. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Is this section really needed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.246.1.53 (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online admissions
Talk:Myfanwy Piper

message: Is the fan pronounced van or vaughn? The transcription was not very intelligible. kwami (talk) 06:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronounciation 
Talk:Lindström quantifier

message: There are two separate pages for Lindström quantifier and generalized quantifier, but really they are the same thing. They should be merged in some way, but I'm too lazy to care about it. Nortexoid 20:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, at a very first glance they appear to be different notions.--Popopp (talk) 16:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

message: There is an empty section called "Algorithmic characterization". Is this supposed to be about computational complexity? In which papers should it be based?
Jose Brox (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithmic characterization section
Talk:The Dandelion Girl

message: :This section is in reference to an early proposed deletion by User:LFaraone on 14:53, 28 January 2007 , before the article was much expanded. —Lowellian (reply) 22:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not the creator of this article (Anupamsr was), but I am inclined to agree with Anupamsr that the article should not be deleted. The short story is notable. I have expanded the article somewhat. —Lowellian (reply) 00:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Representation before the European Patent Office

message: I have removed  a collection of references which are inappropriate to specifically help readers understand the topic "Representation before the European Patent Office". The references are general references to help understand the EPC (and prepare the EQE). "Adding external links can be a service to our readers, but they should be kept to a minimum of those that are meritable, accessible and appropriate to the article" (WP:EL). --Edcolins 20:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of a collection of references 

message: I believe that there should be a reference to the EQE-ONLINE.ORG website as it is an official  EPO resource for students taking the examination. --Peqe (talk) 10:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your message. There is a link to this resource in the "External links" section. This is sufficient IMHO. Please also read WP:COI, if you are affiliated with the web site you recommend. --Edcolins (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of EQE-ONLINE.ORG
Talk:WellSpan Park

message: I found this, but I'm unsure how to add it to the page.  This is a live webcam overseeing the construction site: http://24.104.55.230/view/index.shtml Jaylectricity 20:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Vartan Oskanian

message: How do I add a picture?
:Click "upload file" on the left side. Than add "Image:Example.jpg" in the articel. ROOB323 09:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Picture 

message: See the discution here. Švitrigaila 12:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vartan Oskanian or Vardan Oskanyan? 

message: Is he still the foreign minister under the new president? Is this article current?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.88.52 (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: current?
Talk:Jacques Bernard Hombron

message: https://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap.person.bm000003742
Sources:
E.J. Godley, 1965, "Botany of the Southern Zone: Exploration to 1843", Tuatara, 13(3): 165-168
E.J. Godley, 1967, "A century of botany in Canterbury", Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 1(22): 243.
References
Brummitt, R.K. & Powell, C.E., Authors Pl. Names (1992): 280; Chaudhri, M.N., Vegter, H.I. & de Bary, H.A., Index Herb. Coll. I-L (1972): 308; Jackson, B.D., Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew (1901): 33; Lanjouw, J. & Stafleu, F.A., Index Herb. Coll. A-D (1954): 171; Lanjouw, J. & Stafleu, F.A., Index Herb. Coll. E-H (1957): 245, 284;
JulieMay54 (talk) 00:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  additional sources
Talk:Viper dogfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:OSCAR (disambiguation)

message: *Support - but then I put on the  tags ;)  These should come together in one larger disambiguation list. — MrDolomite | Talk 20:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and merged it; having two lists was clearly an issue as there were several items on both and several items on only one of them – Qxz 18:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion with [[Oscar]]
Talk:Jules Verreaux

message: An entire edition of a journal focusing on "Lion Attacking a Dromedary". Some of the papers are open access:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/21516952/2023/66/3
©Geni (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source
Talk:Social reality

message: Surely this should be merged with socially constructed reality
1Z 20:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This article and it's contents seem to be all contained already in the article Social constructionism. Therefore it should be either deleted or merged (if there is anything to merge).88.114.154.216 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article delete? 

message: I was redirected here after searching for "social world," for a brief review of the term before a lecture.  This should not be happening.  Social world, a term that mostly is associated with symbolic interactionism, has a very specific meaning in that tradition, which is much, much more narrow than the whole of social reality. It mostly is associated with the work of Tomatsu Shibutani and Anselm Strauss.  No mention of their work, or anything related to it, appears on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.22.24.91 (talk) 11:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Social World" Should Not Redirect Here
Talk:John Murray of Broughton

message: I really hate it when people who know nothing about the subject stick these things on. There is little further information about this subject available. There are, to my knowledge, no extand pictures of this individual. No, it does not need an info box, no article NEEDS an info box. 
Rather than saying 'this is a start' please make constructive suggestions and to what developements you suggest. If you can't be bothered, or don't know, then just leave alone.--Docg 10:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be better, naturally, if this linked to an actual article on Act of Indemnity 1747 - but that article doesn't currently exist, and someone may or may not create it. For now, it is better if the reader can find out what an Act of Indemnity is, by linking to the general article.--Scott Mac 15:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Act of Indemnity link 

message: This must be B class / Good article level by now surely? Svejk74 (talk) 11:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article classification
Talk:Intellivision Rocks

message: This release doesn't have an exclamation point.  I'm rather unsure about what all should be ALL-CAPS, if at all, but since Wikipedia haet ALL-CAPS titles anyway, it's a moot point.  Changing definite matters to correction. T.J. Fuller, Jr. (talk) 08:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation
Talk:Elisabeth of Schönau

message: Could this be changed to "pre Congregation" to clarify that she is indeed considered to be "in the canon" but it happened before the Congregation for Saints was created? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "not canonized" 

message: This sentence is sourced, but it is still simply an opinion and perhaps the article could indicate this. "While celibacy offered women a sense of freedom, a woman could not officiate in the central practices of the Christian religion, leaving women essentially powerless."  Perhaps "While celibacy offered women a sense of freedom, a woman could not officiate in the central practices of the Christian religion, leaving women essentially powerless (as per a common modern interpretation)." --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The bias is strong, and arguably wrong, given that there were medieval women who wielded considerable influence. It seems to represent a very narrow-minded, stereotypical view of the Middle Ages. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  women were essentially powerless 

message: It's useful to mention once that these forms of the name all occur (if they do) as equivalent, but then I think it is more useful just to use one form in the article, and the form linked to in the corresponding Wiki article (otherwise the question naturally arises, why change it?).  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egbert, Eckebert, Ekbert
Talk:Eugène Louis Bouvier

message: The french article on the Wikipedia refers to Louis Eugène, rather than Eugène Louis. Lgtrapp (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eugène Louis vs. Louis Eugène 
Talk:The Music Tapes

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 08:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing in the article that is sourced is that they played at ATP. The rest all needs sources for verification. I'm surprised you need to ask this. --Michig (talk) 08:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan

message: I feel that although the "Continued Research" section is very helpful and informative, it does not belong in this article about de Mairan.  I think it would be more appropriate to put it in a 'Chronobiology' or 'Circadian Rhythms' article under the heading "History".
C1ock20 (talk) 03:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Continued Research" section 
Talk:Achille Guenée

message: Is the proper spelling "Guenée" or "Guénée"? All the reliable sources I've seen (including publications authored by him, such as this) support the former, which was also in the original title of the article until it was moved without explanation. Unless someone can find a rock solid source for the "Guénée" spelling, I'm going to revert the move. Hqb (talk) 14:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Accent in name?
Talk:Pierre Denys de Montfort

message: I cannot find the accent aigu é in Denys, nor in his own works, nor in other works, e.g.  and . -- Crowsnest (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but you will see that it is listed as a "sometimes spelled", here . You need to download the pdf and find the name Montfort listed alphabetically. Invertzoo (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This would be a much better article if the passage:
"He proposed that ten British warships that had mysteriously disappeared one night in 1782 must have been attacked and sunk by giant octopuses. Unfortunately for Montfort, the British knew what had happened to the ships, resulting in a disgraceful revelation for Montfort."
did not leave the reader wondering what actually happened to the ships. This is a totally obvious piece of information that would not have been omitted from the article by a capable writer. 2601:200:C000:1A0:904:B674:EF84:FEE0 (talk) 16:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This would be a much better article if ...
Talk:Comarcas of Spain

message: My fellow Wikipedians, I just, after a bunch of research on the subject (consulting the Manuals of Style, looking at other pages' "Edit source" pages, likely some other stuff), removed the image of a map of the counties of Spain from the infobox where it lay(ed). At first, my intention was to provide an English translation of the image's caption (in this case the description of the image not on the image's own page, nor on the article. It appeared once one clicks on the image: that kind of caption), as this is the English Wikipedia. But as I researched into those MoSs. I realized that the map was of counties, not comarcas. Therefore, I decided to conclude my research early, and to then fully replace the image from the article. 
Thank you, and good midday. Vive la Franks (talk) 17:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what the deleted map represents, certainly not the modern administrative division of Spain. It's better to leave it out of the page. --Jotamar (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image removed 

message: Why is there no mention of the actual closest English equivalent/translation of Spanish “comarca”, which is the word “shire” (and NOT “district,” “county,” “area,” “zone,” nor “region,” each of which translates distinctly differently into Spanish as “distrito,” “condado,” “área,” “zona,” and “región,” rather than “comarca”)? BTW, the famous “Shire” in Tolkienʼs “Lord of the Rings” is translated into Spanish as “La Comarca,” as it should because no other translation would be a better match. 92.178.80.48 (talk) 06:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't shire kind of an old-fashioned word? --Jotamar (talk) 22:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shire
Talk:Labbacallee wedge tomb

message: There is currently an unsourced tale in the folklore section of this page about the Hag being crushed by a boulder, which relates to one of the burials in the tomb. I have been unable to locate a source for this story anywhere else. I would prefer not to delete the information entirely in the hope that there is a valid source in existence somewhere, possibly offline. I would be grateful to anyone who could point me towards the likely origins of this particular story. Daithi82 (talk) 14:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folklore Source
Talk:Marc Athanase Parfait Œillet des Murs

message: I've tried to put some more evidence on both sides into the article.  The German Wikipedia says his father's name was Jacques Athanase Parfait Oeillet Des Murs (thanks to In ictu oculi for pointing this out), but that doesn't help, since we still don't know what part was a given name that was the same as his father's and what part was the surname.  (Also, it doesn't give a source, and I can't find one on line.)  How can we figure this out? —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 03:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also according to .de, his son was Albert Henri Edme Des Murs, a member of the Société entomologique de France—with a reference showing that there was such a person, listed as A.-H.-Edme Des Murs—but I can't find any connection on line between the two men.  The .de article also shows our man's death certificate with "Oeillet des Murs" in big letters.  That seems to be the source for his parents' names, incidentally, but I don't see his children's names on it. So the confusion increases. —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 14:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname Des Murs or Oeillet Des Murs? 

message: First of all Oeillet Des Murs was born in Paris see here. Second he died in the year 1894 in Nogent-le-Rotrou according to the death certificate in the German Wiki. I discussed that as well here some time ago and even James Jobling agreed and updated it on HBW Alive. This error was reproduced from author to author that he died 1878 without questioning it.--Earwig (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some errors in the article
Talk:Belle Bennett

message: The file :c:File:Belle Bennett.jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: No authorship information. No publication information, so that the 'before 1923' claim seems made up by the uploader. Picture could have been created after 1923. Unknown copyright situation. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -JamuthiraR (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons
Talk:Pierre Adet

message: Sources differ: some give Paris as his place of birth and 18 May as his birthday. I have gone with the majority of sources as far as I have been able to discover them (i.e. Nevers, 17 May). Perhaps someone else will know of a clincher? -- Picapica (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date and place of birth
Talk:Billy Sheehan (Gaelic footballer)

message: I have added references. Billy Sheehan is a very well known Irish sportsman. He plays at the very top level of [[gaelic football]. Should not be deleted in my opinion. Heshs Umpire (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As well as a great player Billy Sheehan is also a brilliant maths teacher at Our Lady of Mercy, Drimnagh, Dublin 12.
Keep up the good work!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.125.91.165 (talk) 16:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy-Boyo 
Talk:Donald Cameron of Lochiel

message: I've removed a link to a picture - according to the DNB, who I'll take as having done the research, "No portrait of Lochiel has survived". This is presumably a speculative or a misattributed one. Shimgray | talk | 20:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Donald Walter Cameron of Lochiel

message: The image here is inadequate for identification purposes, simply put. In order to avoid pointless edit-warring, please don't reinstate it to the infobox. I guess we will have to wait 10 years before adding the beautiful Stoneman portrait! Until then, maybe another free alternative can be found. But like I said this IWM crop is such bad quality, one can barely identify "Lochill"... Fitzkarl (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would advise you to read WP:OWNERSHIP. I am not going to restore the image myself but you can't stop others from doing so just because you dislike it. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:Celia Adler

message: My highbeam account is inactive but the free abstract indicates she had a son. (a source already cited in this article) http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-2591300135.html
Someone with an active account: please review the full highbeam entry and add relevant details. --Jeremyb (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  no mention of her son 
Talk:Carolina University

message: This article is totally plagiarized from The Dispatch Online.--John Foxe 20:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just fix the grammatical errors you noticed? --orlady 16:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Florent Prévost

message: At least Prevost's squirrel is dedicated for Constant Prévost and not for Florent Prévost.--Earwig (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And the real illustrator was Prevost (Lucien Alphonse) here and not Florent.--Earwig (talk) 14:00, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong in the article