lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Congener

message: Some references used in making this page:
*http://www.scientificsocieties.org/jib/papers/2004/G-2004-1310-263.pdf
*http://www.desy.de/~sergio/Funari-JLR-2003.pdf
*http://www.esf.edu/aec/publications/abstract/baldigo.htm
I noticed that the definition of congener in reference to chemistry is unclear. The term shows up in the article on MRSA, and I followed the link here, however, it doesn't explain how a molecule can be considered similar to another based on closeness in the periodic table. Does it mean that perhaps one atom, or one element, in congener molecules differs between the two molecules but is always something within a small space on the periodic table? If not, what does it mean? 75.81.46.183 02:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given the importance of this topic, I should like to suggest that a separate article be made of this.  There should also be links to and from 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangover
Perhaps the below links will suggest the topics importance
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8416431.stm
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/12/18/booze.hangovers.congener/
Thanks, Rumjal --rumjal 06:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Congener in Alcoholic Beverages

message: Congener in beverage jargon refers only to chemicals produced in fermentation. Tannins and other things found in the base ingredients are excluded unless the amount of that particular substance increases substantially (like diacetyl, which is present in some grapes, but is also a byproduct of ethanol synthesis). Also, in distilled beverages the color comes from oak barrels or caramel coloring. Made appropriate changes. Thatoneguy (talk) 19:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tannins and others
Talk:Duelling roller coaster

message: To me, "dueling" coasters require near-miss fly-bys going in opposite directions.   Nearby coasters traveling in the same direction are racing, not dueling.   The closest I've come to experiencing such a coaster is a No Limits sim of Gwazi.  I've been on Kennywood's Racer many, many times, and it's a racer with no fly-bys.  An examination of photo galleries of Grand National reveals nothing that I'd call a "dueling" element.  Am I missing something in the definition?  -- Ventura 23:05, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
:I'm with you on this.  The writers of the two articles also seem to be confused, as some of the same coasters appear as examples in both articles.  IMO, a dueling coaster is one in which the trains may start from the station in the same direction, but then appear to "attack" each other; if there's no "attack", it's "just" a racing coaster, and if a dueling coaster by definition doesn't require "attacks", then what's the difference between dueling and racing?  There are no fly-bys in either Lighting Racer or Rebel Yell, either.  Both of these coasters feature dual trains that leave simultaneously and follow similar layouts, sometimes near each other and sometimes just out of sight of each other, but never crossing over or facing each other.  Lightning Racer even features flashing lights, racing flags, and a pre-recorded announcer to broadcast the winner of each race; it's definitely a racing coaster by any definition.  Maybe some bozo got confused between the words "duel" and "dual"? Canonblack 13:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What does "duel" mean in a roller coaster context?
Talk:Hanover (disambiguation)

message: Since several years Hannover offically (e.g. by city authorities) is spelled with two "n" in English text as well as in German text.  This refers to the City of Hannover, Hannover Region, Hannover Messe, Hannover Airport. WOuld someone please check all these spellings. Thanks!
: I assume you are talking of authorities of the City of Han(n)over? -- If so, it shouldn't matter. Usage in the English Wikipedia should be based on common English usage, so it depends on what English authors use. Chl 18:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanover or Hannover
Talk:Nickelodeon Studios

message: I know the gift shop is closed but what will happen to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob 2.0 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The gift shop was replaced by a ticket office for the Blue Man Group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGervStud (talk • contribs) 11:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gift Shop 

message: How did someone find out what is in the time capsule?--75.120.50.216 (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Capsule 

message: Last time when I went on this article, it said it would reopen on June 7, 2014.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.236.109 (talk) 00:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will [[Nickelodeon Studios]] reopen on June 7, 2014? 

message: It's not fair about nickelodeon.😠 2607:FB91:19AA:DF90:1965:D859:2A9F:EBC8 (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair 

message: Sometime around October 2004, the building underwent a makeover. I believe we should add at LEAST one photo of the building after it, maybe two to include one after the building was abandoned. Zedonathin2020 (talk) 13:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remodel Photos
Talk:Crashing Through (album)

message: How about some interpretations, etc.? Lilac Soul 11:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peepshow (album)

message: "The banshees claim it as their masterpiece"...any sources that have them quoted as saying this?Zombieliving 23:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005

message: This brand new user, 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18 with a brand new ip has been vandalising this page for two months for genre warring. BEATWEAKer edited the same thing on  01:16, 9 September 2012‎ as 2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18, what a coincidence. This was quickly corrected 15 minutes later by IllaZilla at 01:45, 9 September 2012‎. Carliertwo (talk) 15:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2013: vandalism by a brand new IP [[Special:Contributions/2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18|2601:A:4100:5A:642E:1EB6:B88:2B18]] that looks like a clone of  [[Special:Contributions/BEATWEAKer|BEATWEAKer]], a user that has been blocked indefinitely

message: Important. It reached only #68 not bad for such a band but spent a total 20 weeks on that chart 
http://www.billboard.com/artist/279469/siouxsie-and-banshees/chart?f=305  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.135.159 (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  us billboard 200   20 weeks  
Talk:Change of venue

message: The Wikipedia entry on the word "venue" says it derives from the Latin "to come".  This entry has a different Latin origin.  Can this be fixed?  See: "In law, the word venue designates the location where a trial will be held. It derives from the Latin word for "a place where people gather." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.5.71.245 (talk) 19:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin origin of the word venue

message: Info on the procedure for change of venue has not been included. Firestar464 (talk) 02:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Procedure
Talk:Ornithopoda

message: I think they would be more properly described as browsers. It may be presumed from their anatomy that they usually ate off the ground. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: the article follows the Reliable Sources HammerFilmFan (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Browsers?
Talk:Gatemouth Brown

message: A duplicate of this article exists at Clarence Gatemouth Brown. --Commander Keane 12:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out. I have redirected this article and am merging now. -- Dave C.talk | Esperanza 15:07, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate:  Clarence Gatemouth Brown
Talk:Karafuto Fortress

message: This article appears to have useful information but needs to be cleaned up.--PvtDeth 00:19, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs cleanup

message: This article is a very detailed recounting of a specific set of defensive moves made by the Japanese in Karafuto when Russia invaded in 1945. There are a number of associated articles on WP about this island and its military history and they are all very detailed, and it's a struggle to find outside independent military histories published in English to support the detailed histories of the specifically military events. Novellasyes (talk) 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Military history
Talk:List of storms named Khanun

message: any more info on this typhoon? --Revolución (talk) 01:36, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's got a little info but it needs some organization - "Storm history" and "Impact" sections. Jdorje 07:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Not notable enough. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 01:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection.  It's short enough a merge could just copy the entire article into the seasonal article and it wouldn't (quite) be too long. — jdorje (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Merge. --Coredesat 07:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged it. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 18:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Radio City (pirate radio station)

message: Radio City was eventually to provide the Government with a much more compelling reason for their closure. [end of article]
And...?  Are we missing a piece of text here? Flapdragon 00:25, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Mea culpa. I originally wrote this thinking "I'll go to bed now and finish it tomorrow...or the next day...or next week..." and then forgot about it. But yes, I did intend to fill in the missing details: namely, how a dispute over the station's ownership led Calvert to confront a business rival and allegedly threaten him with violence, which led to his death in what the rival claimed to be self-defence. Lee M 00:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

message: In the article it is stated that the Radio City scene was shot on Shivering Sands. However, an undamaged station with all towers can be seen. As both Shivering Sands and Nore had lost one resp. two towers through ship collisions, this would leave Red Sands as only possible site. Is Shivering Sands explicitly stated in the movie's documentation?--Matthiask de (talk) 08:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fire" movie
Talk:Theodore Maiman

message: "Due to his work on the laser, he was twice nominated for a Nobel Prize". I don't believe that nominations for the Nobel prize are ever released or confirmed. They do it for Academy Awards but not the Nobel Prize. There is no way to confirm this.  Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 05:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to his biography at the National Academy of Sciences, he was nominated three times for the Nobel Prize: http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/maiman-theodore.pdf  Mahousu (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobel Prize 

message: I had the extremely good fortunate to work for Ted Maiman in the early 1980s when we both worked for TRW. Ted was in charge of New Ventures for TRW Electronics, and I was chosen to head one of the new business ventures. Ted was - without a doubt - the best manager I ever had. His combination of intelligence and openness, combined with an ever challenging, constructivy critical, questioning style, made it a joy to work for him. We remained close after he left TRW, and I was profoundly saddened to hear of his passing.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.209.129.132 (talk • contribs) 
Hello,  You expressed Ted so well. Can anyone imagine the pleasure I had married to him for 23 years? --Kathleen Maiman (talk) 17:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  76.209.129.132
Talk:Coastal Party

message: It would be interesting to know if there have been any other political parties in the world with the self-avowed main aim of promoting maritime interests.  It's not the most common party ideology, exactly.--Pharos 21:43, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, there are at least two more: the Ukrainian Maritime Party and the Seaman's Party of the Philippines.--Pharos (talk) 06:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar parties? 
Talk:Eastern California

message: I'm concerned that the latest edits and addition of infobox makes the term "Eastern California" seem more well-defined and accepted than it actually is. I just cannot find any reliable sources that talk about the exact boundary of the region. I would recommend removing the map from the infobox, and restoring the hedging in the article. —hike395 (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've found some sources that use the term "Eastern California," and I've added them at the bottom under "External links." The info might well be incorporated into the article if anybody wants to do it. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overcertainty about term 

message: I've never, ever heard "Eastern California" used to describe the entire strip of counties along California's eastern border. It does get used to refer to the area east of the crest in the southern Sierra Nevada (Inyo, Mono, and sometimes Alpine counties), but the article in its current form seems like it's describing a neologism. There's no coherent regional identity linking someone in Alturas, someone in Folsom, someone in Bishop, someone in Riverside, and someone in El Centro. I think the article would be better off focusing on the area commonly known as Eastern California, not the entire eastern strip of counties. CJK09 (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I have never heard this term. Especially since it's so sparsely populated, seems like people identify with the nearest town (bishop, mammoth lakes, mono, susanville, etc). Unsure what this article accomplishes. Nweil (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism?
Talk:Blackwater mercenaries

message: The original page appeared to have been cut and pasted from another source since outside formatting was still apparent. I attempted to edit in such a way as to save the content and lessen the possibility of copyright infringement. However, there may still be copyright issues. I added the New Orleans bit, it is original.
This page is redundant; see Blackwater USA. On that latter page, I have briefly described Blackwater's activities in the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts on the Gulf Coast, according to their own press release and Jeremy Scahill's news article. I have left out any mention of "shoot to kill" because I have found no sources to confirm that they have, in fact, been given such power. Though their employees have been "deputized", which I admit makes it very likely that they have been given such power, I am wary of inferring too much, especially given the polemic surrounding this company. Nicktastic 03:46, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

message: This article was redirected to Blackwater USA as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Elections in the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic

message: I'm not sure there is a move proposal, but if there is, I disagree. See Talk:Prime Minister of Western Sahara. Also it's useful to keep this as a disambiguation page, since elections take place in the territory under both systems (in the Polisario-held and Moroccan-held parts, to the SADR and Moroccan legislatures respectively). Lastly, Moroccan elections in Western Sahara are not Elections in Morocco per se (since they do not take place in recognized Moroccan territory), and should be dealt with here (if only like this, with a link). Arre 15:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * There is 2 solutions: move the page or use an infobox without flags to comply with WP principles of neutrality. Daryou 20:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move?
Talk:Hill committee

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.  No consensus to move at all, much less where to move. Born2cycle (talk) 05:07, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:LSR

message: I have this problem with  Bash article. Latest stable software release/Bash is used in the article, but  [+/-] sign points to Latest stable software release/Bash (Unix shell). It most likely happened because the article changed its title at some point. I could probably easily fix it by moving the template under new link, but that would break all other articles that use the template. What is the best solution here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by K4rolB (talk • contribs) 19:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Got the problem solved. K4rolB (talk) 09:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template applies to article but points back to different template 

message: By including small in this template, it violates :MOS:ACCESS, specifically :MOS:SMALLTEXT,  The font size is too small. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I also fixed , which had the same accessibility problem. Small text was displaying at 75% of the default font size in the infobox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small must be removed 

message: I feel like that would help with consistency especially when used in conjunction with Template:Multiple releases Nathanielcwm (talk) 08:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Option to use / instead of brackets to separate release date and release version? 

message: The template LSR, such as:

does not produce the same result in preview like a live article.
In preview it shows the correct day difference (today (2021-07-06): "9 days ago"), But it shows Template:Latest stable software release/Linux ("1 day ago") instead, as it were 28 June 2021 today. Go, edit the previous link and check it out!
-- ZH8000 (talk) 19:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a purge problem -- ZH8000 (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error: Preview and article do not produce the same result. 

message: I think this template should able to detect whether  is used to display version number and date, to my eyes, if  is used, this template should hide the [±] link. --Great Brightstar (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No edit link if Template:Wikidata is used
Talk:John Gotti Agnello

message: The facts section does not add anything to the article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. "Facts" like "Favourite cologne is Versace" and "His favourite color is white" are not important. Evil Monkey - Hello 04:53, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thx for the reply, I just revert vandalism since this page gets it on a regular basis. I also somewhat dislike people making large deletes like that without proper explaination behind the action (what might be clear to you might not be so clear to somebody else), so I do have a tendency to ask for an explanation because I'm nitpicky. Once again thanks for your contributions to this page. --ImmortalGoddezz 05:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I think the facts section needs either to be removed, reworked, renamed (?), or citations added. I am not sure that driving a particualar type of car is encyclopedic or notable at least in terms of his overall notability. Rob 02:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Informer (1935 film)

message: *Supposedly this is set during the Irish War of Independence which occured from 1919-1921; yet the date is 1922 was the begining of the Irish Civil War!
Yes, if it's based on the book it seems to take place in the aftermath of the Irish Civil War (maybe 1924 or so), but certainly way after the Anglo-Irish War.
(I haven't seen the movie)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.203.192 (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Plot hole]] timeline
Talk:Line of Demarcation

message: Through which continents does the line of demarcation pass?
The original line passed through Greenland and Antarctica but missed the other continents. The antimeridian passes through eastern Siberia, New Guinea, Australia and Antarctica and maybe Japan. When they moved it to the west, it passed through eastern Brazil in South America, but still passed through Greenland while missing North America. I think, but I'm not sure, that it now definitely passed through Japan, although nobody knew that. Australia, Brazil and Antarctica were unknown to the people who drew the lines in 1493 and 1494.--Syd Henderson 17:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continents 

message: Please add a map! I would like a map for the first line, and the second line. Thank you. 71.210.196.236 18:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add a map! 

message: So now we're blaming the Catholic Church for colonialism? Tourskin (talk) 17:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference this PIS 

message: This article comes across as very POV to the point of editorialising. This division of the world did not mark a new and uniquely European attitude. Rather, one could argue, for all of recorded history, until relatively recently, it was common for stronger or more aggressive nations or groups to conquor territories and other peoples - indeed one could say it was the norm. Such diverse and non-European empires as those of ancient Egypt, China, the Mongols, the Arab Muslims, the Aztecs and Incas operated in this way. It is a relatively recent development for it to be commonly accepted that territories should be ruled according to the wishes of their inhabitants - the idea would probably be as foreign to the rulers of any of those empires I mentioned as to the pope who divided the world between Portugal and Spain. Booshank (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PIS

message: Maybe we should merge this into Treaty of Tordesillas and create a redirect here... DerPaul (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think this Line of Demarcation should be redirected to the Treaty of Tordesillas, which already discusses three lines of demarcation between Portugal and Spain, that due to the papal bull Inter caetera in 1493, that due to the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494, and the latter's antimeridian in the Pacific due to the Treaty of Saragossa in 1529. — Joe Kress (talk) 18:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Due to consensus I am redirecting Line of Demarcation to Treaty of Tordesillas. — Joe Kress (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I removed the paragraph that was causing the POV and lack of citation issues. It was added by one individual in 2007 and appears to be his/her opinion only and therefore could also be considered original thought/research. If others are OK with this the messages at the top of the article could be removed. James (talk) 13:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues fixed?
Talk:Mister Roberts (novel)

message: I have tried and failed to find a reliable source to confirm that the coroner eventually ruled the death a probable suicide. There are many references to Heggen's suicide online; many of those are duplicates. But none of the ones I have reviewed give a source for the statement. Either the New York Times did not follow up on its article on the autopsy or a follow-up somehow escaped digitization. Leggett distinguishes between Ross's suicide and Heggen's tragic death.Merry medievalist (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would be good to have official source on final cause of death
Talk:Rio Grande (1950 film)

message: The second paragraph says that John Wayne is playing the same character from Fort Apache. Is that right? I always thought the three films in the Cavalry Trilogy existed in their own timelines. Captain York in Fort Apache never made any mention of a wife or child in the film, and Victor McLaglen, Grant Withers and Jack Pennick all come back in different roles. --Funkychinaman (talk) 21:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: York/Yorke