lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Korea under Japanese rule

message: A few weeks ago, @Magyar Andreasz set the start date of the period to 1905. I'm unsure of this, so wanted to double check.
For the infobox, the params are:
 | status                 = Part of the Empire of Japan
 | year_start             = 1905
In the lead, it states Korea was a protectorate in 1905. From that article: . This suggests to me that we shouldn't use 1905 as the start date. However, it may be that language is being imprecisely used; I don't really know the details of the 1905 treaty, maybe it was really part of the Empire. toobigtokale (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: if no reply in a week, I may revert back to 1910 fyi toobigtokale (talk) 17:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Your revert was the correct move. Yue🌙 08:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1905 or 1910 for start date? 

message: Downgraded article to C; it's still not the best. Still lots of poor and unsourced writing that needs to be pruned, and missing lots of info. Doesn't communicate what living in this period was actually like. Going to be significantly rewriting it over the following months. toobigtokale (talk) 07:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And the lead (I wrote) is too long :) Need to cut it down eventually toobigtokale (talk) 07:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article grade and improvements 

message: Whenever someone's Wikipedia article mentions they were born in Korea during this period, I've come to favor the practice of linking the phrase  to this article. I think this wording is a decent compromise.
Alternatives include:
* "Korea" (non-specific and potentially misleading link)
* "Japanese Korea" (I think confusing to unfamiliar people and doesn't specify "Empire of Japan")
* "Korea under Japanese rule" (I think verbose and lacks specificity of "Empire of Japan")
* "Chōsen" (opaque to people unfamiliar with Japan or Korea)
toobigtokale (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of this article in birthplaces 

message: @Malan Fun tagging to discuss; please keep in mind WP:3RR and please add sources for these claims. At the moment your recent edits are WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH; I'm not saying your edits are wrong, I'm saying our job is just to report what scholars are saying. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note that the editor you tagged was identified as a sockpuppet and has since been blocked Dantus21 (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colony vs part
Talk:List of dreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy

message: I don't know why a list of dreadnought battleships includes anything after the N3-class. The Nelson-, KGV-, and Lion-classes were quite explicitly treaty battleship designs, and Vanguard is considered a fast battleship. Having them lumped in with a list called "dreadnought battleships" is incorrect and confusing. 
Rather than split the article again, I propose the article be renamed to remove "dreadnought" from the title. Thus, take over the existing List of battleships of the Royal Navy content-less article, or come up with another proper alternative for the article. ☽Dziban303 »» Talk☾ 01:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dreadnought battleships" is a poor title 

message: The ed17, I do not agree with your move of this list and so have reverted it in accordance with WP:RMUM. I am happy to discuss here. Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , I moved it to maintain consistency with all of the other warship lists, which categorize by country. (Plus, not everyone knows what a "royal navy" is.) Happy to start a requested move, depending on your reasoning for keeping it at the current name. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  , thank you for the response.  My reasoning in WP:CONSISTENCY with other Royal Navy ship type lists (please look at the lists included in Template:Royal Navy ship types).  Whilst some warship lists categorise by country, this is far from universal and not just confined to the Royal Navy, a few examples include List of ships of the Royal Australian Navy, List of ships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, List of ships of the Republic of Korea Navy, List of ships of the Portuguese Navy, all of the lists within Template:Swedish Navy ship types and all of the lists within Template:United States Navy ship types.  Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , while I'd prefer we be consistent all the way across, surely you'll note that the lists there at least have the country name in them. This is the exception. I'm sorry I wasn't more clear in my earlier post. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  , I disagree, all use the WP:COMMONNAME for that navy. Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 09:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed move
Talk:Danzig Research Society

message: Can we please not use this page as a place to edit war over the name of the city in question?  If edit wars continue, it will be protected, as any other page in unstoppable edit war.  Pakaran. 21:01, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: *Maps of Prussia for location in Prussia and various spellings of Danzig throughout several centuries.
This link is not related to the research society and was consequently removed. We cannot start a naming discussion for each bulding in Danzig/Gdansk that covers half of the article.
80.134.121.105 10:40, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I have to point out that user Molobo, who was blocked for ignoring the 3RR and/or for using sock puppets, inserted double content into the article. After this mess was cleaned up, Tirid Tirid who is suspected of being a sock puppet, simply reverted to this double content article, claiming to "rm POV". I urge these users and their puppet masters to stop editing wikipedia, after they have shown their inability do to so properly. --Matthead 22:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand the current version of this article is full of weasel terms and dubious statements... Halibutt 14:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sachsen Poland seems like a fancy way to refer to the fact that the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth had a personal union with Saxony. However, contrary to what this article states, the town belonged to Poland at that time and not to the monarch nor to his other domain, Saxony. Also, the statement of "German-speaking Central and Eastern Europe" seems highly dubious. Where is the "German-speaking Eastern Europe"? I'd reword that to something like "society was one of the oldest research societies in Central and Eastern Europe" simply. Halibutt 14:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Finally, the mention of the post-WWII territorial arrangements seems completely irrelevant to this article. And even if it was, it should be portrayed neutrally. It was the Potsdam agreement that gave these areas back to Poland, not just Soviet Union. Halibutt 14:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double content and blind reverts 
Talk:Flatness

message: I think mathematical part of this article is completely useless and should be removed
Tosha 21:21, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a section on flatness in dynamical systems theory. Unfortunately, no one has created an article on this interesting property. Anyone out there who can do it? --JanHRichter 20:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another meaning of flatness 

message: The "flatness" of a liquid surface is not dependent on the local curvature of the earth's surface, but upon the distance of the surface from the center of gravity with additional small perturbations due to the earth's rotation, position of the moon, etc. Likewise, the curvature of the earth (barring any local deformations) is dependent upon its distance from the center of gravity (with similar perturbative influences). This should be made clear in the article. The local curvature of the earth and the curvature of a liquid surface are similar because of a similar underlying cause - one is NOT caused by the other.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.202.227.61 (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  liquid flatness
Talk:Wettin, Saxony-Anhalt

message: * Mücheln near Wettin was not affected by any bombings in WWII. 
* This town is certainly mixed up with Mücheln (Geiseltal) which indeed had chemical facilities and lignite coal mines.
Wuschelhase (talk) 08:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mücheln Error
Talk:Roosevelt, New Jersey

message: Is there a source for this claim? 
Thanks. 
72.83.36.13 (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting source 

message: I think it would be best if someone adds a section about the big house fire that took place on 3/1/23. As someone that lives in the town this is one if not the biggest news story we've ever had. I think it would be best to wait though until more info arrives. 
Heres some articles that talk about it:https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/live-updates/monmouth-county-house-fire/
https://www.app.com/story/news/local/emergencies/2023/03/01/roosevelt-nj-house-fire-woman-faced-eviction-swat-team-responds/69959183007/ 2601:84:8701:786D:ECF7:5C86:92C8:969C (talk) 23:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding new section
Talk:European Convention on Human Rights

message: All nice to put speed limitations up to 30km/h if this is in the interest of public safetly. But limiting the speed on roads leading to villages and communes (not in the village and in the commune) to 30 km/h even at night? We are we supposed to deliver medicines during the night - but we cannot do that anymore for the actual prices if we have to reduce our speed in the night to 30km/h? Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything on protection of liberty of movement and transport vs speed limitations 

message: Ukraine suspended it's adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights in order to effectively enforce martial law in its territory on the 29th. The article, and map, should reflect this. Kingofmapps (talk) 14:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukraine's Suspended Adherance
Talk:List of physiology topics: respiration

message: This page is to broad.  For a page like this to be helpful it must dichotomize the physiology of respiration. This seems to have the opposite effect. Bensaccount 22:24, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure anatomy (aka organization) is necessary to understand physiology (function), but the purpose of making a specific page for the physiology of respiration should be to exclude anatomy (as much as possible). Ideally you should be able to talk about the physiology of respiration and let the text hyperlinks take the reader to the appropriate places to fill in the background knowledge.  (this goes for stuff like diving too).
These ideas are good but I still think theres something lacking...Bensaccount 22:44, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: To provide the best organization, it should be that the physiology page links to this page renamed as respiration (physiology). This page should link to the standard (non-physiology) respiration page, which is currently called gas-exchange, and to other pages which subdivide the physiology of respiration, such as various physiological mechanisms of respiration.  E.g. mechanisms for the control or respiration. Any subjects that do not subdivide the physiology of respiration should be removed. Bensaccount 22:52, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Yakov Zeldovich

message: I've just added some info about Zeldovich, but I think, more, especially in astrophysics, needed. Also the photo and perhaps copyedit of my bad English. Cmapm 16:15, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is great. I've tried to copyedit it and add what little I know about Zel'dovich. I think he did some very important work in black holes and stellar structure, but it's not something I know much about. --Joke137 05:07, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for additions, copyediting and for you kind words. Although, I think, actually, the scientist was great, I only did my best to make a short summary of his bio. The section on astrophysics looks much better after your additions and in my view, the article is almost complete. Cmapm 11:52, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some info added, more needed

message: Can we decide whether or not to write the apostrophe in his name? The article uses both indiscriminately. Marnanel (talk) 18:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Only the references/books as of now use ', KR 17387349L8764 (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The apostrophe 

message: The links https://master.sai.msu.ru/en/zelcen/ and https://managementtools5.wlu.edu/managementtools/alsosoffline.htm are only accessible with user/pass. KR 17387349L8764 (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links/Refs to managed sites
Talk:Bergen-Belsen concentration camp

message: Nowhere mentioned is factual material historically pertinent. It being the following as related by a Bergen Belsen prisoner who survived and was there at the camp’s liberation. 
The Nazi Bergen Belsen camp officials anticipating the imminent arrival of Allied troops were determined to leave no prisoners alive to provide witness testimony. They denied prisoners all food and water for three days. For the fourth day a soup was to be served that would be readily consumed by the starving and dehydrated prisoners. A soup laced with poison. British troops arrived before the soup could be served. 2601:645:4300:3BF0:89C5:9BC6:6724:142D (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pertinent information disclosed after liberation 

message: ADD To "Notable inmates" section - Gisella Perl - A Hungarian Jewish Gynecologist who wrote "I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gisella_Perl MiloTheCat123 (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actualcpscm (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2022 

message: Rudi Oppenheimer passed away in 2019. He is referenced on this page in present tense in the following text: "This work is now continued by his brother Rudi, who shared the experiences". Please change this to past tense.
Reference:
https://www.holocaust.org.uk/news/rip-rudi-oppenheimer
https://www.het.org.uk/news-and-events/786-rudi-oppenheimer-bem-1931-2019 Dingbong (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Mvqr (talk) 14:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2022
Talk:Respiration (physiology)

message: Theoretically this page could dichotomize by species (humans, fish, etc...), but I think most of this info is already just for humans so i will leave it.
I have added "breathing" in parantheses to the opening paragraph. As a layman, this does seem to be what we would say in the vernacular. Please revert this change if I have completely misunderstood this topic. -- dpol 07:00, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I really love this page and it's linked pages.  And I look forward to the norwegian translations. --Ekko 08:35, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good work! 

message: What do you think, everyone? How about making the respiration page about Aerobic and Anaerobic Respiration, (about internal, or cellular respiration) and removing the whole merge thing. --eshcorp
I agree.  Respiration is by no means the same as respiration, so please remove merge.
:Ditto and removing merge. Cburnett 05:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Signalling agreement with this decision. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the merge, please 

message: The name of this page is Respiration (physiology), but the existing page is not a physiological definition, it's a biochemical definition. Nearly all the content is already presented at cellular respiration. I have rewritten the bulk of the article to properly reflect the term's use in animal/human physiology. I removed a good deal of content, and have moved it here:
Robotsintrouble 04:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total rewrite - definition of respiration 

message: I suggested this merge, as it appears that the content of the above page merely covers the stage of pulmonary gas exchange and does not yet have enough breadth to merit its own article. Your views are appreciated. Robin S 01:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[External respiration]]

message: I moved the following text to here, because it seems a bit off topic. Please sort the text out that specifically deals with respiration, or at least relate it more clearly. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced text 

message: Both physiological and cellular respiration REQUIRE OXYGEN ?!?!? This is just not true.  Nor does the definition of physiological respiration adequately include the importance of transport of the Redox metabolites to the cell (or transport IN the cell for that matter).  I will leave it to those more skilled in the science to define the difference between physiological, cellular (and perhaps biochemical) respiration (cycles).  This article is not up to Wikipedia's normal standards.71.31.147.72 (talk) 06:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage. 

message: Describ the physiology of Respiration 2409:4051:4E87:7919:0:0:660A:A10F (talk) 04:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomy GNM nursing 

message: Respiration  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.89.32.157 (talk) 08:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic science
Talk:Yogachara

message: Frauwallner (1956), The Earliest Vinaya and the Beginnings of Buddhist Literature,mentions Yogacara only once, at p.21; he does not say that  Tathāgatagarbha thought formed a separate school. According to Wiiliams (2008), Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations,chpater 5 (The Tathāgatagarbha),note 1, Tathāgatagarbha is not a philosophical school, but an idea or notion. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my mistake. It is supposed to be Frauwallner E. "Die Philosophie des Buddhismus," Berlin, 1956 (p.255-264, die Schule Saramatis). And works by Minoru Kiyota, etc. --173.68.165.114 (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find the term "Saramatis" in that book; could you be more specific,orprovide a quote? Tathāgatagarbha-thought is not regarded as a separate school of philosophy, as far as I know. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The second chapter. --173.68.165.114 (talk) 22:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; clarifying. Nevertheless, as far as I know, it's not usual regarded as a 'school of philosophy', but more as a 'current of thought'. But some adaptation must be possible. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I expanded the text, including a note on Sāramati (娑囉末底), c.q. Maitreya-nātha. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frauwallner
Talk:Yuri Gagarin

message: The early part of the biography smells a bit like BS. Typical propaganda jargon from the period. Can we please remove that? After all Gagarin can't talk back any longer. 105.4.6.55 (talk) 10:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. That's both a blessing and a curse. To avoid having an edit like the one you suggest reverted, justifying it here with e.g. WP:NPOV would be a good approach. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 11:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda Jargon 

message: He was born at 1937 not 1934 2A04:241A:8400:980:79B1:C2A2:F41A:48A1 (talk) 15:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Britannica says 1934, as does the  European Space Agency, and Purdue University and New Scientist, etc. etc. What's your source? Thanks Martinevans123 (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction for the date of birth
Talk:Savant (disambiguation)

message: The article "Savant" contains text about autistic savants that belongs in that article, if anywhere.  I have removed that text.  Just in case someone thinks it's worth putting any of it into the autistic savant article, here it is:
: A common belief is that autistic savants may use more of their brain than normal people or that they use portions of their brains in different ways than others. It has been reported that some people develop autistic savant skills after some sort of injury.
:There are several variations of savant.  Polyglot, savage and natural, and each has different specialities and characteristics.
Question:  In what sense is Burkhard Heim supposed to be a "savant"? 
:Zaslav 02:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

message: As my edit summary says, the first edit turning this into a disambiguation page was taken from Savant (disambiguation), whose sole contributor was Neutrality, at 01:59, November 3, 2006. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut down, C/P'd, GFDL, etc.
Talk:USS Seadragon (SSN-584)

message: "(having no other choice)" - ha ha ha, very funny. :-) I see the DANFS author seems not to have noticed the the silly-sounding statement... Stan 02:33, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Both the USS Seadragon and USS Skate pages say that ship was the first to surface at the North Pole. Which won the race? 24.237.38.49 (talk) 16:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: Just wondering if anyone out there served with Floyd Laughren around 1958.Mother is his bother and looking for pics or memories of him if anyone can help. thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.18.154.58 (talk) 14:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My dad was a crewman from 58-61 2600:1700:BA70:39D0:D8DB:4230:DD97:A007 (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  floyd laughren pic?
Talk:Budweiser Rocket

message: Huh?  That last sentence is a dilly! Pollinator 06:12, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: huh

message: I removed the following apparently nonsensical text: 
No account was made for the excessive drag forces which are now known to affect ground-level sound-barrier attempts at speeds higher than 700 MPH. Since there were neither any independent witness, nor any degree of measurement expertise involved in this assertion, it is not generally held to be appropriate proof of the claim. 
*Claimed speed: 739.666 miles per hour (Mach 1.01), released by the United States Air Force 8 hours after event 
*Eyewitness testimony: no sonic boom was audible
*Recorded radar speed: 38 mph (recorded speed of truck nearby by accident)
*Other recorded data: Accelerometer data from vehicle, photographic images.
*Driver: Stan Barret
*Other top speed claims: 638 mph in earlier attempt
~ Strathmeyer (talk) 19:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: removed
Talk:Projective group

message: There is a substantial discussion of projective profinite groups in   These are projective groups G such that if  A,B  are finite, and G → A  and B → A are epimorphisms, then there is a map G → B.  That reference uses the term "projective group" for the concept.  They turn up, for example, as the Galois groups of PAC fields.  Since there are no links to this page that refer to projective linear group, it seems reasonable to use this page for an article based on that material.  Deltahedron (talk) 06:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Projective profinite group