lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thoracic duct

message: The article states that the thoracic duct starts at the level of T12, however while reading Gray's Anatomy for students (2019), on page 233, it states that "The thoracic duct extends from vertebra LII to the root of the neck.". I do not think I am qualified enough so I will leave this to someone more qualified to look into this further. Thank you.
———————————  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzahhar (talk • contribs) 16:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

message: Dear Wikipedia contribuitors,
receive a respectful greeting. The article about the right lymphatic duct reads that it drains lymph fluid from:
:"... in some individuals, the lower lobe of the left lung."
Can you tell, please:
1. If this is a very uncommon exception (1%-15%) or it is quite common (16% or more).
2. If this is related to racial conditions or something like that.
Besides, if this is not very common, this article (about the thoracic duct) should read 
:"It collects most of the lymph in the body except that from the right arm and the right side of the chest, neck and head which is collected by the right lymphatic duct; and, in some individuals (around ?% of world population or mostly this people of ? race), from the left lung lower lobe, too. And it drains into the systemic (blood) circulation at the left brachiocephalic vein between the left subclavian and left internal jugular veins.
Thanks in advance!
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 22:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lower lobe of the left lung
Talk:Clean Up Australia

message: This topic is highly notable in Australia, almost an institution. I will try and 'neutralise' the prose but it is notable Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Although the language is on the repetitive size, not sure that it is overly promotional as such. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Jim Skardon

message: There never was such involvement.In pg.55 of Timerman's book,the author remembers what Skardon "once reminisced"abouth"the best method of interrogation".<Timerman,Jacobo.Prisoner Without a Name,Cell Without a Number.Alfred A Knopf,Inc.New York,New York.1981.pg 55.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerardopertzov (talk • contribs) 20:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Involvment  in Argentina dirty war.
Talk:Many Happy Returns (Eureka)

message: around 16th minute, Fargo comes to police station and subsequently warns Carner to handle fussion generator with safety concerns like it would be possible for it to explode or something, note that nuclear fussion needs controlled conditions or else it ceases very quickly, the is not sci-fi but rather an example of Fear, uncertainty and doubt talk living on common myth that evertyhing connected with nuclear world/physics is dangerous ...
--Nimrodanar 19:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FUD talk
Talk:Allroy's Revenge

message: The following sources are from http://www.allcentral.com/html/articles.html but it would be better to find the original publications to cite:
*Sold Out #8 (1989): Review by GW – may not be a notable publication
*Rolling Stone (1989): review – no author given
*Flipside (spring 1989): "Chedsey Interview"
*BAM (1989): "ALL...or Nothing at All" by Steve Stolder
*Request (August 1989): "ALL – Allroy's Revenge (Cruz)" by Chris Morris
*Flipside (May 21, 1989): "ALL – Allroy's Revenge LP" by "3-D"
*Orange County Register (1989): "Noteworthy Albums for the First Half of '89: All – Allroy’s Revenge (Cruz)" by Cary Darling
--IllaZilla (talk) 05:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Virgil Thomson

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 18:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Bidding box

message: Interesting, but there are several questions that arise for me in the Procedure section (I have played bridge but not at a serious level):
*What is "Law 25"?
*What is a "skip-bid warning"?
*What is an "LHO"?
Point 3 in particular is extremely cryptic; I can't for the life of me work out why someone should be forced to wait 10 seconds while "giving the appearance of studying his hand" if that's not what he's actually doing. Is it necessary to mind-read a player's intent to see whether they are following the rules of the game? Explanations or links to articles where these terms are explained would be welcome. -dmmaus 04:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. We bridge nerds tend to forget to make things a bit clearer for "mere mortals"; also, we usually have  template at the top of most articles containing "cryptic" terms, but I forgot to add it here. I'll try to address those issues. Duja 07:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, that expansion helps a lot. Thanks. -dmmaus 03:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Procedure section
Talk:Arrow Electronics

message: Can someone clarify the significance of the Computerlinks related articles added by Northamerica1000? If this is an important issue, there should be a summary in the main article followed by a citation. As-is, the entire Further Reading section looks like an afterthought.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.18.208 (talk) 05:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Further Reading

message: The previous version of this article was a copyright violation of . Dammit 13:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violations

message: The article (section about the tragedy in 1980) states "Among the 13 Arrow officers killed were two of the founders, Roger Green (President) and Roger Green (Executive V.P.)." I'm quite sure that there was only one person named Roger Green there, so if someone could correct this, please. 93.139.158.247 (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: "The company specializes in distribution and value added services relating to electronic components and computer products". Wow—for such a big company, this is an amazingly vague, jargony description. Does "value added" (which should be hyphenated, shouldn't it?) even a real thing, or is it just business buzz-speak? Unfortunately I don't have time to do any real research to form theories on what this should say, but I'm guessing it'd have half as many words and actually, you know, mean something. – AndyFielding (talk) 09:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague lead paragraph
Talk:Jolan, Babus

message: I'm considering putting this up for deletion, a teach/ethonographer doesn't really have a place on Wikipedia.
Also, the article is badly written "is", full of errors (randomly switches between "she" and "he"), has a large portion of non-english text without translation (book titles) and makes no clear distinction of the person's actual first name and surname. If these can be corrected, please do so. +Fin 13:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to cleanup. +Fin 16:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would merge and clean up this but I don't know the subject or Hungarian. A google count suggest it should be at Babus Jolan or even Babus Jolán and he is a she. MeltBanana 16:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion
Talk:Pilot (Eureka)

message: ...to Pilot (Eureka episode), as all of the other episodes are listed like this. --Codenamecuckoo 08:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I suggest a move... 

message: Perhaps this could be named "scientific and paranormal references." As science fiction has grown as a literary genre, it has become increasingly self-referential and draws on basic concepts (or bastardizations of concepts) in science. Things like tachyons, Area 51 (both of which are referenced here) or alternate timelines, string theory, electromagnetic pulses, etc. are often used as part of science fiction and would probably be appropriate, as they are examples of these forms of science or important parts of history in fiction. It could be a running category in each episode, as there is generally a "technological big bad of the week" on Eureka. --LKAdriaan 04:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:Signalling block system

message: I have posted my thoughts on the organisation and coverage of safeworking matters in Talk:Railway signalling#Safeworking/signalling topic organisation.  Philip J. Rayment 11:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safeworking/signalling topic organisation 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Damn. Missed this. Safeworking is not the same thing as "Signal Block Systems" or whatever THAT means. Safeworking encompasses a lot more than just signalling. Looks like I'll have to start the article again... --Michael Johnson (talk) 04:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: This is a truly appalling article. Nowhere does it actually define what signalling blocks actually are. And then it rolls out a random collection of signalling and operating methods. Some of which have absolutely nothing to do with block signalling. This article as it currently is doesn't seem to know or understand what it is actually about! The main railway signalling article gives a much more coherent explanation. I would propose that this article be totally re-written from scratch! G-13114 (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is awful! 

message: This section requires cleanup. Moving block has nothing to do with braking distances or operating on sight. It's about movement authorities that aren't limited to specific points but continuously move with the preceding train using that train's position reports to determine which sections of the track are free. --PhiH (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving block
Talk:Ocean floor disposal

message: Ocean sediments are a potential environment for nematodes and microorganisms.  Radioactive waste may damage these biota, these biota may have food chain relationships with more mobile organisms, and the nematodes may cause sediment disturbance significantly altering long term waste transfer rates projected from diffusion through undisturbed sediments.  This article presently ignores these potential issues.Thewellman (talk) 18:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ocean benthic environment
Wikipedia talk:Non-free content criteria/Amendment 2

message: Previous discussion, albeit not about this specific amendment, can be found here:
*Wikipedia_talk:Fair_use/Fair_use_images_in_lists
*Wikipedia_talk:Fair_use/Archive_5#Clarification_of_FUC#8
east.718 02:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussion

message: To invite more people to discuss this topic I posted a message in the Village pump about this proposal. Garion96 (talk) 15:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village pump 

message: So how are going to resolve this? - User:Peregrinefisher  UTC 09:12, July 29, 2006
:I dont think we ever will, this just seems to be dragging on and on. and the supporters continue contradicting them selves. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 14:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My question is am I the only one that see's the hypocrisy in Ed's argument?  He cares about 3rd party reuse and has said fair use is contrary to this goal.  But somehow if the images are owned by the wikimedia foundation then their copyright somehow doesn't matter when doing 3rd party reuse.  (Their logos aren't under a free license so the only claim is fair use when copying.)  It's a glaring hypocrisy to me and if Ed can't even acknowledge that then how do you resolve an argument with that kind of person?  I don't think you can. Cburnett 14:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The logos are not (or at least "should not be") used inside articles. The example you give uses the logo as an interwiki link. This is part of the frontend which, like the logo in the top left of every page, is not necessarily free. ed g2s • talk 15:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:InterWiki is no more the "front-end" than :Template:User wikipedia/Administrator or any other template.  Pure decoration plain and simple.  And it's still another story change: we've now added on "unless it is a 'front-end' template"...  Cburnett 04:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree with you Cb. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 14:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolve
Talk:The Simoqin Prophecies

message: When was this novel first published? The Infobox says 2003 and the text says 2004. Grey Shadow 13:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 2004 :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First published? 
Template talk:Cagliari Calcio squad

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 02:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support.   Slumgum T. C.   22:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Opika von Méray Horváth

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Phil Dowd

message: There have been numerous additions recently, all about Dowd's involvement in Wigan Athletic matches.
:I have removed the content regarding Wigan's defeat to Arsenal in the League Cup semifinal second leg in 2005/06. The source says nothing about Dowd being "at the centre of controversy" and merely says that he turned down three Wigan penalty appeals during the match. Referees turn down multiple penalty appeals in every match, every weekend across the country, so I'm not sure why the editor deems it encyclopedic that Dowd turned down appeals in this match.
::The content about Wigan's draw at Blackburn in 2006 has been written in a very non-neutral manner. I will improve the NPOV on this item.
:::The allegation of swearing at Wigan players in 2007 did not result in a formal complaint. We see players on the television swearing at referees constantly during matches so it is unfair and non-neutral to put across a point to the reader of this article that Dowd allegedly swore at players - nothing was ever proven.
::::And finally, Wigan's Boxing Day match is nothing more than a recentism. It will be forgotten very quickly (except perhaps among Wigan fans who thought the red card prevented their team from beating Manchester United, at Old Trafford, despite being 1-0 already and as the source says "but in truth United had shown plenty of menace even before Park's early strike"). If consistent news stories continue, such as if Wigan appeal the red card, and it is rescinded, etc, then we could consider it for inclusion. If it is ultimately included, we need to portray it with better NPOV. For example, the current content implies Dowd was very anti-Wigan but mentions nothing of the fact that a Man United player "had a penalty appeal turned down despite being wrestled to the ground by Maynor Figueroa". --TBM10 (talk) 17:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are jeopardising the neutrality of the article by dictating to the reader that Dowd's decision was "unfair". You should state the facts, then let the reader decide for themselves. The fact is that Sammon was sent off, and another fact is that the FA rescinded it. I have no affiliation to Man United or Dowd, but believe in fundamental neutrality. --TBM10 (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent additions
Talk:Chris von der Ahe

message: Referencing the sixth paragraph - "In 1887, after a poor showing in the World Series,...."
Major League Baseball's World Series did not exist in 1885 and did not involve the American Association which collapsed in 1891.  By all historical records - including that from the St. Louis Cardinals and Major League Baseball - the first World Series was in 1903, and the first won by a St. Louis team was 1926.  MLB considers pre-1903 championship series to be precursors to but are in fact not World Series Championships. 
Championship series of the 1880 era were fractured and disorganized (St. Louis Browns Stockings played 15 games vs Detroit in 1885, losing 10 of them).  
As such von der Ahe did NOT own a World Series championship team at any time in history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The RW (talk • contribs) 01:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1885-1890 World Series didn't happen
Talk:Scott Norton

message: Any source to the statement that he created Norton Antivirus? Jackjackjackjackjack 23:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: If I knew how I would fix it but it seems someone vandalized it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.82.22 (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is all messed up

message: Scott Michael Norton shares his name with a student currently attending Trumbull High School in Trumbull, CT: Scott Simon Norton.  Strangely enough, both Scott Nortons were born in the month of June, thirty years and thirteen days apart.  Coincidence?
Pikalax 21:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a coincidence? 

message: The IMDb link (reference #3) takes you to the entry for Over The Top, but Scott Norton isn't listed as portraying any of the roles in the film. Should the article be amended to reflect this and/or the reference link taken out? HDC7777 (talk) 19:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being cast in Over The Top 

message: Scott Norton was born 1958, not 1961: : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6nOT2ax1XA&t=2022s 78.72.91.6 (talk) 21:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong birth year
Talk:3 Count

message: He was a part of the invasion. Also, I'm changing it to WWF/WWE because they debuted when it was the WWF.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SChaos1701 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Nice catch! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 01:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Karagias in WWF
Talk:1905 Tour de France

message: I changed the jersey leaders, according to . Since there was no source given for the original jersey progression, I could not check which source is better.--Pie.er 08:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jersey leader 

message: The stage results section has been tagged as needing cleanup. I have no idea what needs to be cleaned up there... I'll leave the tag there until the 1903 Tour de France GA-review had finished, and if the stage results section layout is approved there, I'll make it the same here and remove the tag. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section cleanup 

message: I don't understand the phrase: "Had the 1905 Tour de France only included the Vosges. . . " Could someone please clarify.    Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the phrase, hoping this is better. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please clarify 
Talk:IEEE 802.11y-2008

message: Shouldn't this be 802.11 Why???
No Mike, your thinking of 802.11u.
In the section "Beyond the US 3650 band", There's a line titled "4.9Ghz", while it states "4.9MHz" in the text... Typing error?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.180.91 (talk) 23:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Charles Evans Whittaker

message: Just to let anyone know who might be curious, I am making a minor edit of one of his son's names. It is actually Charles Keith, not Keither, and I would happen to know because I am his granddaughter. It can also be found in a Time magazine article here: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,824705,00.html Lizz7372 04:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Charles Evans Whittaker was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: The article cited to support the claim that Justice Whittaker criticized the Civil Rights Act does not, in fact, mention him by name at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.166.213 (talk) 08:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the reference and came to the same conclusion, I've added  to the sentence, if it's not corrected soon I will remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by InsaneHacker (talk • contribs) 09:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil Rights Act

message: I've removed the following section, since the citation has nothing to do with the claim it is supporting:
:Like many conservatives at the time, he criticized the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as unconstitutional.The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
If someone wishes to reinsert the claim, please provide an adequate citation. Thank you. Respectfully, InsaneHacker (💬) 18:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section for lack of proper citation 
Talk:Scale analysis (statistics)

message: Hi guys, here are the terms I was mentioning in class as a starting point for a taxonomy of the methods covered.
* probabilistic -- deterministic
* nonparametric -- parametric
* dominance (Guttman) -- proximity
* ordinal (nonmetric) -- interval (metric)
* bottom-up -- top-down
* continous -- discrete
* latent -- manifest
* explorative -- confirmative
* Guttman: nonmetric dominance model, perfect deterministic cumulative scale, 
Besides these, I have a few terms which (as I understand it) can be defined for each model separately. 
* Purpose of model
* Definition of model violation
* Amibiguity in the negative response (= what does "no" mean?)
* Parameter estimation
* Test of model fit
Please do not write to me or others what to change/improve but EDIT this page directly and correct or extend any part you know something about. Wikipedia:Be_bold_in_updating_pages!! Madmaxx 13:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mendoza Province

message: I think the Mendoza's coat of arms is not correct, try copying the coat of arms in this page: http://www.redargentina.com/ESCUDOS/Mendoza.asp
Greetings
It's exactly the same as what is at wikipedia. Bcartolo 23:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago

message: Should Chief Keef be added to the list of notable people here? Since he did grow up in Parkway Gardens, which is in Greater Grand Crossing. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 05:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People
Talk:Zara-class cruiser

message: Stephen, p.69, puts Zara as "completed" 21 October 1931; am I taking liberties saying "commissioned"? Also, Stephen puts draft at 19 ft 5 in, presumably normal or standard; length at 557 ft, presumably waterline; & speed at 32 design, 33-35 trials, 29 normal at sea. Can somebody with better sources confirm/refute?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  20:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Factcheck.com

message: Of what steel was the belt made? Was it Krupp cemented steel ? Mr.Lovecraft (talk) 13:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  armoured belt