lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Model engineering

message: Please, I am not a vandal. All I did was remove the brackets from Tubal Cain. I honestly don't know how the other three alterations happened. I'll have to click "Show Changes " in future. Very sorry--Wes. 82.37.114.89 20:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sneaky" Vandal 

message: I have been bold and expanded this page well beyond what was here a few days earlier. The upside, I hope, is that the new content will create more interest in model engineering. The downside is that I have not yet provided enough citations to published work. I am confident that most of the new material can be supported by citations, because I know that over the years I've read just about all of it in various model engineering magazine articles. Finding all those articles again will take a long time for me to do alone. Can I ask any of you who just happen to know of a supporting reference, if you could help add citations. I have done my best to be comprehensive, neutral, write well, and so on. But of course, other informed contributions are welcome to make this page even better. Stringybark (talk) 00:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major expansion of content, June 2014
Template talk:User French

message: Are French those who live in France not necessarily those of French ancestry as this template was originally created for Cajun and New France ancestry alikes. To be added in the French wikipedians category, please use instead the newly created "French" or "Proud French" templates. French ancestry users can use the Acadian or upcoming Cajun templates instead. Thanks! Cliché Online 20:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an American of French ancestry, not a Francophone, and I don't appreciate what you are doing at all.  I believe that you are imposing your narrow-minded worldview upon others without an appropriate dicussion.  If you want to be a Proud French, then go right ahead, but leave me with my heritage still intact.  Thanks.  --Eric R. Meyers (Ermeyers) (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: template revision

message: I'm gonna go ahead and Be Bold. The template says "French ancestry." It says not one word about being able to speak French, so to see that adding the box to my userinfo also added me to category Francophone was a bizarre surprise. I'm not of Cajun or Acadian ancestry at all; my French ancestry was a soldier under Lafayette. I picked this template over the other because I like the Fleur de Lis better than the French flag (it's prettier than three stripes!), that's pretty much it--and I think that's a valid reason to pick it.
I'm changing the template to get rid of the category stuff that isn't about what's in the template: French ancestry. joye (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: template revision
Talk:Games People Play (Joe South song)

message: Added a songbox
Jdavidw13 18:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The entire section about the origin of and inspiration for song was conjecture not supported in any way by the reference/source cited. Anyone who disagrees with the edit is invited to read WP:RS and WP:OR before any reversions or restatements of the former material. Please find supporting material. Regards Tapered (talk) 07:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Garden Party (Rick Nelson song)

message: Omitted is Ricky Nelson's own re-recording of Garden Party with the Jordanaires and studio musicians on his self-released 1985 album All My Best. The version is different enough (and in my opinion certainly good enough) to be included.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jthaden (talk • contribs) 08:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omitted Re-Recording 

message: What, no translation of all the references?  This is one of the best songs of metaphors (after "American Pie", of course)! Jmacwiki (talk) 05:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Qaumii Salaam

message: The transliteration is inconsistent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.22.166 (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The [ŋ]s in the IPA needs to be checked. Our Thaana article gives that letter a different value. — kwami (talk) 23:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Was this why you added [ŋ] to the Thaana article? The [ŋ]s translated here are actually phonetically wrong so I just deleted them. The actual sound is somewhat like a glottal stop. In fact the the sound of some of the letters with sukun(the diacritic) are unusual. 'ށް' and 'އް' are basically equivalent. 'ން' is [ŋ]. 'ތް' sounds a bit like [ɪ]. Perhaps these should also be changed?--124.195.208.66 (talk) 04:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Template talk:MTVawards

message: *Clearly this is a major edit. :)  I was WP:BOLD in my attempt to make the box smaller and remove all the extra "MTV" and "xxx Award" duplicate text.  Figured I would leave a note here as a spot for any discussion/feedback. — MrDolomite | Talk 20:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format Change
Talk:Geil (song)

message: Genre: Italo disco? -- Gebu (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Genius of Love

message: I've added a link to the song's page on WhoSampled to the External Links list. Given the section on Sampling of this song, this seemed an appropriate useful external resource. If this is not appropriate, let me know.Dalziel 86 (talk) 05:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WhoSampled Link 
Talk:Shifting nth root algorithm

message: so it follows that this algorithm is completely useless, as it is always outperformed by much simpler binary search, and has the same memory complexity.
Yet it is even mentioned in some dictionaries... could it be that the pencil and paper time complexity is different, compared to a binary search? 82.139.85.33 20:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, there are some problematic assumptions. In computers small products and additions have more like O(1) computation time thanks to them being implemented with optimized HW rather than a digit/bit at a time. (And very large products are better than O(n^2) as well). --Jake 18:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless? 

message: the first line of the sum shouldn't it be 600 not 400 ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Japhes5005 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth root of seven 

message: In the section titled "Paper-and-pencil nth roots", on the right side of the calculation area, the third row looks like this:
    3(10×14)^2×4 + 3(10×14)×4^2 + 4^3
While the fourth row looks like this:
    3(10×144^2)×2 + 3(10×144)×2^2 + 2^3
Note that the exponent in the left-hand term of the third row (as well as the first and second rows) is outside the parentheses, while on the fourth row (and fifth and sixth), it's inside the parent instead.
Is this an error?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougdigdag (talk • contribs) 14:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Paper-And-Pencil Calculation Example? 

message: Could anyone show example of finding square root of 2 in balanced ternary? Preferably, with some comments, i can't figure it out, neither find any related info.. xakepp35 02:42, 08 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balanced ternary 

message: In the paper and pencil section, there is a similar color pattern in the answer as there is in the 0's behind the 3, namely reddish, green, blue, purplish, and then cyan in a following group after yellow in one.  This may be confusing to readers, erroneously indicating some relation between the sets of 0's and the answer.  At least, it was initially confusing to me.  I love the use of color here as a general tool though, I'm just saying having such similar patterns in unrelated things is confusing.  Consider changing.  (similarly, two grays are used for the 3 denoting the cube root and the initial 0 for the p value) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.118.149.208 (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing color pattern similarity
Talk:Get on Your Feet

message: Just did a major clean up on this, removing repetition, unsourced speculation, and detail that properly belongs in other articles. I don't think I actually removed any substantive information, but putting a note here in case I've messed something up that warrants further discussion. Gusworld (talk) 12:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit
Talk:Heaven Is a Place on Earth

message: One reference says the song is similar to "You Give Love A Bad Name". The other says it's similar to "Livin' on a Prayer". --Bensin 07:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely "Livin' on a Prayer". See here. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That video doesn't prove anything. That kind of mashup could be done with any two songs in the same key and with similar tempos and/or structures.  I'd say that "Heaven Is a Place on Earth" sounds equally similar to (or equally different from) both "You Give Love a Bad Name" and "Living on a Prayer"--the two Bon Jovi tunes being pretty similar to each other in the first place.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.43.60.239 (talk) 23:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous information 

message: When did Cyndi Lauper record her cover version of this song, and how was it released? I can't find it in the track listing for any of Cyndi's albums, and it's not a B-side to any of the singles I looked at. --Shawn K. Quinn (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyndi Lauper cover version 

message: Sounds like??
A lot 197.87.143.177 (talk) 08:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bon Jovi
Talk:Get Up and Bar the Door

message: The last paragraph is very badly written, and has a baseless sexist angle.  A  ballad doesn't "talk" about anything. I don't know what "about the sense of lasting competition in a relationship" even means.  Does the "man tries to maintain his power"? Or do they both do so?  If the "woman refuses because she does not want to be treated like a doormat", does the same not also apply to the husband? Finally the sentence "by being stubborn they lost pudding and subjected their possessions to be stolen" is appallling grammatically.JohnC (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Category talk:1999 songs

message: Can you add punk song  2 by silverchair JIBBZSHUGZ (talk) 17:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey 

message: Heavy metal JIBBZSHUGZ (talk) 01:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punk song 2 (silverchair 

message: Punk song  2 JIBBZSHUGZ (talk) 01:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punk song 2
Category talk:2001 songs

message: Under "K", where's Knives Out? WHERE'S KNIVES OUT?!?! You've got almost every other track off Amnesiac (album), but not Knives Out, which is a SINGLE, for Pete's sake!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.178.100 (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something's Not Right...
Talk:Music Publishers Association

message: The page needs a rebuttal to the claims that the MPA made.  Especially the "like stealing tabs from a store" one, which is fucking bullshit.
And come on, would anyone miss these fuckshits if they all died?  They're doing nothing but obstructing the development of art and culture.
:Stop with this. You need to keep a NPOV, and no personal attacks. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Quentin mcalmott 20:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebuttal 

message: I've removed the image from the article. It does not belong in this article unless it was actually created by the MPA, and it does not seem like it was. Quentin mcalmott 20:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no it shouldn't. Quentin mcalmott 23:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, Wikipedia IS supposed to be a site of factual information... "Fuckcunts" IS hilarious though. On par with "cocknuggets" and "slapnuts". --SonicTailsKnuckles 19:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: They're definately fuckcunts. View tabs is like stealing tabs from a store? Not if they're not bloody sold in a store, like virtually every single drum tab out there. Idiots. FredTheDeadHead 18:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Has there actually been anything written about the legality of tabs? I haven't seen anything that wasn't propaganda from one side or another. That said, if we can find some, I'd love to have it in here. Quentin mcalmott 10:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I think the talk page is a suitable place for...DISCUSSION of the topic.....I might just be crazy though...--86.147.35.88 19:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what this is in reference to, but if it's in reference to my comments abut keeping it civil, please note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines for information on what kind of things should be discussed on a talk page. To wit: stay objective, deal with facts, and keep on topic. Quentin mcalmott 22:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The problem here is (from a encyclopedia view) is that there is lots of bullshit.. err i mean valuable information on copyrighted sheet music from the MPA but nothing from the otherside, the otherside being...? amateur musicians? and since i got the floor for a second id like to say fuck the MPA lol sorry Quentin i couldnt resist. The Ravager 01:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MPA reminder
Talk:Piae Cantiones

message: Does the title, Piae Cantiones, mean Pious Songs? I see that the word "Devout" is used in the translation. Ileanadu (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A facsimile copy of Piae Cantiones (Edition Fazer, Helsinki 1967) translates the full title as Pious Church and School Songs of the Ancient Bishops. A Latin dictionary translates piaetas thus "piety; dutifulness; affection, love; loyalty, gratitude". I mean, both words mean essentially the same thing, but it may as well go with the word it's derived from. Rob (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piae Cantiones - Pious Songs 

message: Could we have a list of titles of the songs contained in this text?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents
Talk:Indian locomotive class WAG-9

message: --Iball 21:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Indian locomotive class WAP-7 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 10:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Gurdwara Hemkund Sahib

message: == Plagiarized Material ==
First of all, this wikipedia page looks like a travel brochure for the place, not an article with a NPOV. And secondly whole sections were downright lifted from http://www.hemkunt.com/ or the WikiTravel article on Hemkunt. Please refrain from doing so.
Debangshu Mukherjee (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: First of all, this wikipedia page looks like a travel brochure for the place, not an article with a NPOV. And secondly whole sections were downright lifted from http://www.hemkunt.com/ or the WikiTravel article on Hemkunt. Please refrain from doing so.
Debangshu Mukherjee (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarized Material 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://fateh.sikhnet.com/hemkuntsahib/myth.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ectogenesis

message: There are numerous problems with this article, but I have neither the time to fix them nor sufficient knowledge to do so in the first place. I have added a couple of cleanup tags. This mostly refers to the "Ethics" section, not the others which are well referenced. 
:Bias--This article involves heavy doses of opinion and bias. While I personally agree with most of the biased statements in this article, it is nonetheless biased and needs to be cleaned up. A prime example is the statement that the courts would remove a fetus from its mother because she wore her seatbelt incorrectly. Perhaps a better statement would be that such a situation would make it possible for a court to make such a ruling, rather than insisting that the court certainly would. 
:World Audience--I assume from the statement "our courts", combined with my own opinion of the American Judicial System, that the author of this statement is an American and refers to these same courts. It is, however, inappropriate because Wikipedia has an international audience and this statement refers specifically to one court (or at least it would appear that way). Better wording and above all else, citations are needed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonkun227 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with this Article

message: The following sections were found to be clear Copyright violations and had to be deleted. If someone would like to re-write the article USING this information in their OWN-WORDS the links are available. 
This section: Implications for Roe vs. Wade is from SF Gate Sunday, August 24, 2003.
Key Developments, A Panacea for Reproductive Issues, Ethical Issues, and The End of Elective Abortion? are from Ectogenesis - Panacea or Ethical Nightmare? Wed Oct 01, 2003--DO11.10 18:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations in this article
Talk:Indian locomotive class WAP-7

message: How about http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WAP7_LGD_Shed.jpg for the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpArC (talk • contribs) 14:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

message: not moved. While the minimalist argument is persuasive, the need for clarity argument suggested by Iain Bell is even more so. --regentspark (comment) 12:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The other problem with "WAG 7", et al, is that to most people, it is meaningless. Most of the articles on Polish diesel and electric locomotives have spent some time at their class code (e.g. "EU06"), rather than the WikiProject Trains standard which is to have the railway company as a prefix (PKP class EU06). Even articles on military hardware have something other than just the code, in order to add some context and make it obvious what the article is about. — Iain Bell (talk) 10:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: If all the wheels of bogie are driven independently, then wheel which wears will have sleep and power loss. How it is taken care of in running locomotive? 2405:201:2F:706E:E0F4:4F8B:DC78:33F2 (talk) 14:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In CoCo locomotives, how a reduced size of railway tyre is taken corrected? 
Talk:Speakeasy Theaters

message: I've removed the (prod) because the link from the Speakeasy (disambiguation) page led nowhere. I live about a mile from this theater so I thought I'd add something.  
Edit, don't delete. --MD 21:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be nice to strengthen with some citations to news articles, and a statement of how it fits in with larger SF theater history and culture.  Wikidemo 07:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Johnny Dio

message: When was Dioguardi made into a Captain? I got all of the other information from http://www.crimelibrary.com and on http://www.findagrave.com, where I found his DOB.  I got the other info, i.e. on bliding Victor Reisel and Union racketeering from www.crimelibrary.com. If anybody knows when Dioguardi became a Captain could you please add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.90.33 (talk • contribs) 
:This is all cleaned up now, and this question is answered in the new version of the article. - Tim1965 (talk) 00:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *That's your opinion. If you can find contradictory evidence that is published in reliable, neutral sources, I encourage you to add this information (with citations) to the article and note that sources disagree. - Tim1965 (talk) 22:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotion
Talk:Gettin' Some

message: An alternate version of the remix features the line-up of Too Short, Chino XL (replacing Lil Wayne's verse) and Pharrell. The Chino XL version was an exclusive single released only to radio station KPWR for promotional purposes only; an explicit version was never issued. For a limited time, the alternate remix could be heard on Chino XL's MySpace page. ElMeroEse (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chino XL Version
Talk:Getting Away with It

message: 1 link removed- Footage was music video - No clear indication from clip information or uploader profile that they had rights to
the footage/song concerned. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YOu Tube link removal 

message: ...Getting away with what? 67.5.156.102 (talk) 11:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The meaning of the song is extrapolated as a parody of the stereotype of Morrissey, but... 

message: NOT RELIABLE 
That was before NIELSEN SOUNDSCAN
I doubt it was sold 350,000 copies  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.90.9.62 (talk) 12:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Along with "Get the Message" and perhaps "Disappointed", it remains their best known song, and was also their biggest selling single, shipping 350,000 copies in the US and reaching the UK Top 20.[ 
Talk:Getting Stronger

message: I found :Image:Adeaze-gettingstronger.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Adeaze-gettingstronger.jpg]]