lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glebe Park, Canberra

message: I created this article in order to fill out a few red links and because I had the photo which I have wanted to upload. From discussions on the City Centre, Australian Capital Territory history page I can see that people know more about its history than I do. It might be worth mentioning the skate park and perhaps its proximity to the casiono, but its not worth mentionig its proximity to every other building in Civic (in my opinion). Should also mention adjoining roads. 
Adz 12:12, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I found some shots of the park I took back in Summer, which show change in the park in different seasons. Not sure of the best layout though. Cfitzart 06:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have had a go at the layout but perhaps the revision reflects my prejudices against the 1989 landscaping which was out of character with the former park.  Feel free to revise further.  They are nice pictures - thanks for sharing.--AYArktos 06:20, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, I think the layout does look alot better the way you put it Cfitzart 14:20, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture layout 

message: I was wondering how relevant this is to Glebe Park? The development application I think has been approved, they have almost finished building the display building for the development. I'll check out the website for the development next time I drive past.
From the Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2005 Week 12 Hansard
A Development Application has been made (200404901) for the construction of a 4 block 8 storey high residential complex of 189 units , adjoining Glebe Park on the former Glebe Park Food Court site.
Your petitioners are concerned that:
a. The amenity of Glebe Park and the Reid heritage precinct will be adversely affected if this proposal proceeds.
b. Use of the land for residential purposes is inappropriate given the proximity of Glebe Park.
c. Extension of Glebe Park to include all or part of this land deserves serious consideration.
d. Acquisition of the land by the ACT government for addition to the National Convention Centre site, also deserves serious consideration.
Frobu 10:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New development application
Talk:Peugeot 605

message: It needs to be stated where precisely this vehicle went on sale; in which markets was it to be found? Arcturus 12:31, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: "A 2.0-liter (8-valve) turbocharged 4-cylinder petrol engine (150 bhp) was added in 1991 and provided good performance but proved unreliable".  Could we have a citation for this please?  I've worked on this engine a lot and am not aware of any reliability issues, except when people fiddle with the boost of the turbo without adjusting the fueling to match. Davetibbs 09:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Turbo Engine Reliability

message: It seems to me that a few Peugeot and Citroën car articles (605, XM, 607, CX, etc) have been written and edited by Citroën worshippers who only have one message: Citroën = good, Peugeot = bad and all kinds of conspiracy theories about evil plots by the top brass of Peugeot to destroy Citroën. This is just editorializing and POV, seems to me. Please stick to the facts. Hektor 20:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti Peugeot rantings

message: It says in the main article "Later, a 2.5 turbodiesel (130 bhp) completed the diesel lineup, then the 2.1 was converted to direct injection.".
This is just complete rubbish.
The first direct injection diesel was the 2.0 HDI and later the 2.2.  Neither was fitted to the 605.
There was no direct injection 2.1.Dieselnutjob (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I agree with you and have adjusted the text.  Please make sure you agree my change, and as necessary improve it.   (I am not a Peugeot expert: I think you may be.)  Regards Charles01 (talk) 13:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Direct injection misinformation
Talk:Italian Gambit

message: Hi ThreeE! I bought a new book : "The Italian Gambit (and) A Guiding Repertoire for White - e4!" by Jude Acers and George Laven, , edited by Trafford Publishing. Maybe you can insert it in "References". Thanks for your new article! Bye! 
--Eric Guez 12:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:List of Irish place names in other countries

message: Beckory is recorded in several places as a rare old Irish settlement in England. The town is named for an Irish monastery there, and is mentioned in some reputable sources. (I don't have these to hand unfortunately, but I can look this up).--MacRusgail 13:04, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Beckory, Somerset, England

message: What is a list of places in Ireland doing in this article?  With a few exceptions where placenames are of English orgin, surealy all Irish placenames are oif Irish orignin!  Peterkingiron (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ireland
Category talk:Computer designers

message: This category should be Computer Systems Architect--Gorgonzilla 13:06, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name dispute

message: Should this category be merged with :Category:Computer pioneers? That category is much better populated with the same type of people. Dyl 17:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, I don't think such a merge would be correct, as the computer pioneers also, importantly, include people who has made early seminal contributions in theoretical fields of computing (as well as computer design as such, which is the inclusion criterium of the present, narrower, category). --Wernher 23:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with pioneers?
Talk:Parkes, Australian Capital Territory

message: I've uploaded this pic [Image:Treasury, Parkes.JPG] which would go well here, but can't make it fit without messing with the formatting. If somebody would like to give it a go, please do. Adz 13:18, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Population is probably 350-500 (guess) since The Griffin, an appointment complex, opened on Constitution Ave in October 2022.  I haven’t updated the population section yet, I’ll read some other suburb pages to understand the community standards for that section before I do. 203.12.5.144 (talk) 20:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:How to Eat Fried Worms

message: 15 worms? I read this book years ago so I might be--67.142.130.14 (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was 50. On a side note, this article should be expanded to explain why it's on the banned books list. Dariustriplet 02:26, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was 15 worms and the bet was that he would win $50 dollars if he ate 1 worm per day for 15 days. 68.189.146.193 21:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ^yes that is true 66.169.44.28 03:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of worms

message: Wait... I thought the book was about a contest on Conservation... If this isn't it, then what was the name of that book? Tinlv7 20:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hang on! 

message: I have rarely read such a horrific plot summary. Someone please fix it. Make the pain go away... 130.111.16.108 20:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Current summary was (for the most part) written by a nine year old. You are invited to make it better. Worenklein (talk) 04:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: There's a bit on the end about in the sequel, continuing to eat worms, becoming aggressive, picking fights with girls until Alan feeds him only veggies for a day. I haven't read the sequel, but even the article on it doesn't mention it, and it doesn't seem like a sensible continuation. Taking it out on the presumption it's crap. Cantras 20:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing sketchy bit 

message: "The story continues in its sequel How to Fight a Girl, which has also been released under the title How to Get Famously Rich."
Is this true? Some of the professional and visitor reviews posted at Amazon suggest yes, but their content casts doubt.
--P64 (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequels? 
Talk:Osteology

message: Can someone add info to this article discriminating the two, and how Osteological Allopathy relates to Osteopathy? Rather confusing. Tyciol 12:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understood it, osteology was the study of bones. Osteopathy is the art of treating disease by skeletal manipulation. Something entirely different, and I would argue not the subject of this article. An osteologist is not an osteopath. I have studied osteology and archaeozoology, the bones of humans and animals in archaeological contexts, but I would not claim to be an osteopath. Silverthorn 16:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Osteology vs Osteopathy

message: I can't believe that people actually study bones for a living!
I would.
:I do. Boneyard90 (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't believe 

message: I have attempted to expand and improve upon the brief description that already existed in order to make it more of an article and less of a stub. So far this has included giving some idea of the type of things that go in a typical osteological report and the sort of topics that research can be involved in. However, I think this article still has room for improvement. Suggestions for things that could be included in my opinion are:
* history of the discipline
* key workers in the field
As well as expansion of already existing areas. Silverthorn 13:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding and Improving 

message: There is a new Museum of Osteology in Oklahoma City, OK. It is really cool. Over 300 skeletons! It is part of Skulls Unlimited which was featured on the TV Show Dirty Jobs. If you are in the area check it out! We even bought the T-shirt that allows you in for free if you wear it all year of 2011.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.93.136.80 (talk) 17:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum of Osteology 

message: Those categories of race seem... outdated. "Mongoloid", "negroid" and "caucasoid"... Is this right? I know these are "historical groups" but just mentioning them like that seem a bit problematic, since it appears as these categories do actually make any scientific sense. I really don't have the backup to rewrite it all (at least yet), but seriously, this is really weird. I've seen these categories are mentioned on other articles here and I'm now confused. Isn't race a mostly social construct?
Obviously, there are characteristics common to certain ancestral groups, but is there a valid and recent evidence to sustain these three "historical races"? Can't someone improve this section? I really don't have the knowledge or time for such. Thanks in advance.
--Pwoli (talk) 14:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osteology can also determine an individual's race...?
Talk:CanJet

message: Destinations are not date referenced ie it is not clear when they are valid. The domestic destinations do not reflect January 2005 data from Flight International. Needs to be updated and date referenced. Ardfern 14:18, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Destinations

message: It is Sept 10, as the press release linked to the article states. WestJet 17:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Suspension

message: I'm removing/rewording some facts - surely the airline doesn't employ 448 people now that it's just a charter service? Geoff NoNick 12:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-suspension
Category talk:Albert Einstein

message: Albert Einstein Had a German accent.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.87.15.165 (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some cleanup needed 

message: A subcategory of the Category:Albert Einstein is Category:Einstein family.
According to Wikipedia:Categorization it says:
"Each article should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C".
So for example Albert Einstein belongs to Category:Albert EInstein and also Category:Einstein family, as Category:Einstein family is a subcategory of Category:Albert Einstein, the page Albert Einstein should not be in Category:Albert Einstein, as Category:Einstein family is sufficient. I think this defies common sense, what to do?
Brad7777 (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert Einstein
Talk:Kōshien baseball tournament

message: *Added "High" to some of the names for clarity.  Obviously Japanese don't refer to those schools with English nicknames.  Also translated 商業 to "commercial" and 中学 to "secondary school", which I'm not sure is correct/common or not.
::I think secondary school refers to 高校. I'd fix it but I'm not sure exactly which references need to be changed. Things like "Kokura Secondary" should probably read "Kokura High" or "Kokura High School" if they refer to 小倉高校, but as "Kokura Middle School" or "Kokura Junior High" if they refer to 小倉中学校。Can anyone take a look at this please? LordAmeth 09:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: *Newspapers should be referred to as "Shinbun" and not as "Shimbun" in technically correct romaji.
*Need to add Kanji to names and terms.
*Cross links to Japanese pages?
*Overall--the translation is fairly literal and may need some more explanation for non-Japanese readers.  For example, the name of the prefecture after the high school name.
*Overall--Haven't looked at the style manual for pages on Japan yet...so the page is still raw
*There are lengthy Japanese Wiki articles on the two Koshien tournaments.  They go into detail about the qualifying tournaments, history and notable events, record of winners, etc.  Eventually can be translated over to English.  There are a few broken links to those future pages around wiki.
Ken6en 08:44, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To do list
Talk:Jack Holden (Home and Away)

message: :It is suspected that there will be sparks between him and Martha MacKenzie. The two had first met in conflict and Martha swears that she will never forgive him for giving her an unnecessary speeding ticket. When she found out that he was a murderer, she immediately scolded him without hearing his side of the story. After the truth was revealed, she apologises but still finds him to be a "jerk". It is clear that Martha likes him and only time will tell if they go out together.
Couldn't think of a way to clean it up, and felt it couldn't be left in as it is.  Someone familiar with both writing in an encyclopaedic style and soapies might be able to tell how to expand this article, but I can't.  --fuddlemark 15:25, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is an impressive summary!!  For cleaning up the page, maybe it could be done by adding some headings?  For example, separating them into groups such as "family" and "love life"?  Megan102 02:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Martha MacKenzie

message: This article was redirected to Current Home and Away Characters as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: your just jealous
There is too much emphasis on his "on-again, off-again relationship" with Martha. There are more things in Jack's life than bedroom fantasies about Martha.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canberra User (talk • contribs) 21:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack & Martha this, Jack & Martha that 

message: It was decided Here that this page should be redirected to this list of current home and away characters. This character by itself does not meet notability guidelines so does not warrant an individual article. The information from this article is well summarized in the list of Home and away Characters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.150.54 (talk) 01:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Avia S-199

message: Why would you revert the edits I made on Aug. 20?  I've studied the aircraft and interviewed the pilots who flew it for ten years.
----
That warehouse fire... was it the one that caused the Ústí massacre? --- Sandius 13:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is common mistake which is also on the CZ military museum web pages, etc. See specification of Daimler-Benz_DB_605 and Junkers_Jumo_211. Propeller was heavier and not appropriate for a fighter but needed for the engine with such performance intended for bomber use. Handling problems are confirmed by pilots.
Balooo(cz) (talk) 08:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Jumo 211 being heavier than DB-605 is not correct

message: Since the aircraft was produced is Czechoslovakia, it might be better to use the photo of the  Avia S-199 with Czechoslovakia markings over the Avia S-199 with IDF markings.Articseahorse (talk) 00:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main photo 

message: Which version?  The specs in the article make it sound like a 109E or possibly a 109F. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.38.241 (talk)  
:The article states that the S-99 was a Bf 109G-6 built after the war by Avia, and that the S-199 was the S-99 with a different engine. Was that what you were asking? - BilCat (talk) 00:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Bf109 derivative? 
Talk:1234

message: 그지덜티병아  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.200.233.58 (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  나다 

message: Can I add mention of  "perpetua servitus iudaeorum"?  The page on Pope Greg IX mentions that "in the 1234 Decretals, he invested the doctrine of perpetua servitus iudaeorum – perpetual servitude of the Jews – with the force of canonical law. According to this, the followers of the Talmud would have to remain in a condition of political servitude until Judgment Day. The doctrine then found its way into the doctrine of servitus camerae imperialis.... promulgated by Frederick II. The Jews were thus suppressed from having direct influence over the political process and the life of Christian states into the 19th century and the rise of liberalism."  
Know Einstein (talk) 03:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  perpetua servitus iudaeorum - oddly missing from this page, and others
Talk:Agam Kuan

message: is this historical or legendary, the article states its legendary, if sources verify for instance ashoka's edict and chinese buddhist travelers accounts, then it must be historical. is it legendary based on archaeology because none of the discussion has been made in the article how its legendary it infact tries to prove its historical, regards. 175.137.72.188 (talk) 12:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend vs historical
Talk:Mika Brzezinski

message: Why are some editors falsely claiming that Brzezinski's homophobic remarks about Pompeo were made in a tweet? Politrukki (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homophobic slur 

message: I've noticed this article and Morning Joe's wikipage contain the unsourced claim that Brzezinski "supported" Trump's campaign for president. To my knowledge, Brzezinski and Scarborough were criticized for repeatedly interviewing Trump on their TV show and not for defending his policies or directly endorsing his candidacy. Based on her statements in these Morning Joe interviews I think it's fair to say that Mika Brzezinski did not support Trump at all in 2016, let alone in the same way Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity did and do now. I've edited this section to remove the phrase "supporter of Trump" entirely, and the subsequent claim that Mika "turned against Trump" after he attacked her on Twitter in 2017. At best, this language violates WP:NPOV. At worst, it conflates repeated and ineffectual interviews with direct political support.
Does anyone have alternate sources criticizing Brzezinski for the same reasons as the Rolling Stone article? I'm not sure if it's too biased/opinionated to present a fair account of the controversy here. ⁂ (talk) 19:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed "Support" of Donald Trump
Talk:YMB Saya Tin

message: In don't think the lyrics of the national anthem is by Thakhin Ba Thaung. Any historical proof?
It is the chorus portion of the song "Doot-Bamar" (Our Bamar) solely written by Saya Tin.
-- Zeyar --
This article seems to be mixed-up all the details of two different Saya Tin(s). YMBA Thakin Tin wrote national anthem "Doh Bamar" song. The birth year and parents' names are also YMBA's parents. I will find more references and fix this article. @=={Lionslayer>☎ 05:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: National Anthem lyrics
Talk:Floyd the Barber

message: Can anyone tell me what the actual lyrics to the song "Floyd the Barber" are? I've found that various sources dispute the lyrics, and was wondering if anyone knew the correct ones. Thanks, --User:Kerrysfrench
:Try here. --jh51681 21:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics?

message: I think that this section should be deleted unless a specific live version of "Floyd the Barber" can be determined. There is more than one.--Classicrockfan42 (talk) 22:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one live version has been officially released, the one from 1/23/88 on With the Lights Out and Sliver: The Best of the Box. --jh51681 (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Just to be sure, I listened to it again on WTLO and the vocals indeed go in and out on that version. --jh51681 (talk) 00:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volume's Movement section 

message: we need to get some sources on this one or i will be heavily editing this article i dont know how to flag it so would someone do that for mkay Kas0809 (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sources
Talk:VESA Digital Flat Panel

message: shouldn't this be lowercase? gren グレン 16:18, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: The German version of this page has more information, including some images which I've added. If anyone feels competent to incorporate the German info please do. Btyner 16:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand article

message: Could someone add the DFP acronym and a disambiguation/redirect link to this page, please? Also, it might be good to mention MDR-20 as the connector type. Thanks! - Doug  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.75.24.227 (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DFP acronym 