lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dohosan

message: I did not see this stub when I wrote the full article Dohäsan and believe this article should be closed since that one is a full article.  Thanks! JohninMaryland (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No one has commented in several days, and this seems a pretty easy decision, so I went ahead and redirected to Dohäsan.  If anyone objects, we can always discuss and undo it. --barneca (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: close this article, incorporate it with [[Dohäsan]]
Talk:Four Mohawk Kings

message: The Mahican were an Algonquian-speaking people located in the upper Hudson Valley.  They were not part of the Iroquois Confederacy, which consisted of the Mohawk, Oneida, Seneca, Cayuga and Onondaga. The Tuscarora joined them as the Sixth Nation by 1722.Parkwells (talk) 23:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mahican not Iroquois
Talk:George W. Harkins

message: his mother was NOT the niece of Chief Pushamutaha, but his daughter.  Pushamutaha was an only child, and did NOT have any siblings.
-ancestor of Chief Pushamutaha and Greenwood Lefluer  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.167.249 (talk) 13:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  family history 

message: The photo currently on the page is not a picture of George W. Harkins (1810–1861) but of his nephew, George W. Harkins (1835-1890). I am removing the photo for this reason. Find a Grave memorial 108.14.83.120 (talk) 23:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur with above. There are no known photographs of this man. None should ever be added to this page. Erinspice (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Concerto for Piano and Wind Instruments (Stravinsky)

message: Translated from French wikipedia. Opinions? Should this be a stub? Should this be expanded?  -- Andy Wang (talk/contrb.) 02:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Please help with citation. Link is: http://www.boosey.com/pages/cr/catalogue/cat_detail.asp?musicid=4776. It's a program note. I think it's clear what information comes from it. --Birdman1 02:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added another section, as with many other articles with a section called "references". The link is there.  -- Andy W. (talk/contrb.) 00:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: How many kettledrums is that? I haven't seen a performance where the drummer doesn't have at least two. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I can only recall attending one live performance of this concerto, and that was too long ago for me to remember how many kettledrums were used. However, in this edit, IP editor 2600:1700:37e0:1a00:39be:f905:4ef8:883e corrected "accompanied by timpani" to "The work also calls for a timpani". Presuming the editor to have access to the score (which I do not), I corrected the plural "timpani" to "timpanum", and the Latin form has subsequently been corrected to Italian. It is a common mistake by English speakers to use a plural form of a foreign word as if it were singular ("a biscotti", "one pirozhki" etc.). Of course if the score indicates two or more drums, then the grammatical mistake consists in using a singular article with a plural noun, but then why change the perfectly clear previous wording?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  timp 

message: I am not entirely sure this is true. Stylistically, the Symphonies of Wind Instruments seems to belong much more to the earlier period. Wiki's page on the Symphonies suggests the same thing.
Kpp9c (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symphonies of Wind Instruments is mentioned a Neo-classical work.
Talk:Inkpaduta

message: The article on Inkpaduta [sic] is based on Paul Beck's recent biography. However, Beck failed to conduct any interviews or use sources north of the American border. Mark Deidrich makes the same mistake in his Famous Dakota Chiefs even though he otherwise quotes Laviolette. Although Beck's presentation of events are reasonable enough, he conflates two individuals as if they were one long-lived person. Inkpaduta I was the son of Wamdisappa and was born in the late 1790s as stated in the article, but died circa 1850 in the US. Inkpaduta II his son was born around the end of the War of 1812 and is the individual who died and was buried in Manitoba in 1881. The difference in Inkpaduta below or above the border is probably because American Duta family members tend to be descended from Inkpaduta I directly while Canadian Duta tend more to be descended from Inkpaduta II. Beck's puzzlement about the change in behaviour and attitude of Inkpaduta, how many wives he had or the number of children, is because he has conflated the two individuals into one person.
See Gontran Laviolette's the Dakota-Sioux in Canada (based his book on interviews with Manitoba Dakota Duta family members in the 1950s)
See James Ritchie's The Dakota-Ojibway War (based on similar interviews carried out in the early 2000s.) 69.168.160.48 (talk) 02:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can improve the article using better, more reliable published sources, you are free to do so. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Viola Jimulla

message: This article is very much a stub.  Here are some suggestions on how to improve:
* photograph
* personal biography
*** vital statistics, parents and sibling
*** marriage, children
** list of accomplishments as a Chief
** the legacy she left behind for the tribe
*Please cross out items as they have been completed.  Also, if you see things that ought to be here, please add.
CJLippert 19:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a publication, "viola jimulla: the indian chieftess" by franklin barnett, which should help this article. hope i have time soon.(mercurywoodrose)66.80.6.163 (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: To do to improve
Talk:Anthony Roberts

message: Removed own previous comments - issues resolved. Stevensmith2 (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is citation from various sources. LibStar (talk) 05:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Included further references and improved chronology. No worries. Removed own previous comments - issues resolved. Stevensmith2 (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lappawinsoe

message: In the course of my class I will work on this article and add information on LappawinsoeJulia 44691 (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lone Wolf the Younger

message: The Hitchcock decision mentions the Lone Wolf of the complaint filing an affidavit in 1901. But the Kiowa exhibit at the Smithsonian, put together by Arvo Mikkanen in 2001, states that it was Chief Lone Wolf and not some other Lone Wolf that filed the suit.
Also present in the exhibit is an original document from the National Archives signed by Lone Wolf in 1892.
The exhibit also has a very large photograph of Lone Wolf. It is not the same photo as here, but it is the same man.
So something is messed up somewhere, either Chief Lone Wolf lived longer than is thought, or it was some other, also very famous Chief Lone Wolf in the Hitchcock decision. Xj 04:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out Lone Wolf the Elder. -Uyvsdi (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Looking Glass (Native American leader)

message: I've seen (somewhere...) an account of the 1877 pursuit, which creds him with 200 warriors (out of a party of 700), chased for 2400km by 2000 Army troopers...  Trekphiler 18:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chief Looking Glass had a brilliant military mind which he used to emply military strategies on the battle field. He sharpened these skills growing up as a young and valient Nez Perce warrior. He was a very wise leader and lead the Nez Perce in some incredible victories. In the year 1874, he made an alliance with another Indian tribal group called the Crow Nation. They was another Indian group who scattered across the plains to hunt down buffalo. In July of that same year, Chief Looking Glass and with the help of the Crows, defeated the Sioux on the Battle of Prior Creek, Montana. The Crow Nation was debt towards the Nez Perce which helped them win the war. The Crows extended them an offer of help if they ever needed it when a situation like that if it occurs again. The Nez Perce were greatly honored by their new allies and thus an event did occur. The Nez Perce had to move out of their land because the United States wanted to use their land for cattle grazing. Once they were heading towards the reservation, four white people were killed and that started a series of clashes between the United States Army. Chief Looking Glass took his people towards north traveling from Idaho to Montana again. When the Nez Perce asked the Crows for helped in fighting the U.S. Army, they refused to help them in fighting. Once they got passed Yellow Stone Park, they were headed off to Cananda. On the Battle of Bear Paw, which was the final engagement between the U.S. Army and the Nez Perce, there was alot of casualties. This is when Chief Joseph because both of his chiefs were already dead and they had a huge casualty. In those wars, he clashed with the likes of General  Oliver Otis Howard,Colonel  John Gibbon,General  Nelson A. Miles and Colonel Samuel D. Sturgis were involved as well. Chief Looking Glass also had the help of Chief Joseph and Chief Ollicot. Chief Looking was killed after the battle while going to Canada by a Cheyenne scout.
===External links===
* PBS The West: Looking Glass
* 
* Remini, Robert V. Andrew Jackson and his Indian Wars. New York: Viking, 2001. .
* Chief Looking Glass
Katr67 17:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read about neutral point-of-view, how to cite sources and about ownership of articles. Thanks. Katr67 04:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions need to be added to existing article, not replace it 

message: * PBS The West: Looking Glass
* 
* Remini, Robert V. Andrew Jackson and his Indian Wars. New York: Viking, 2001. .
* Chief Looking Glass
Katr67 17:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read about neutral point-of-view, how to cite sources and about ownership of articles. Thanks. Katr67 04:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:SAI Quiet Supersonic Transport

message: Enormous sections of this article are copied verbatim from this article:  I'm pretty sure this constitutes some sort of copyright violation. Perhaps someone should clean it up? Larry V (talk | e-mail) 02:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright vio? 

message: I saw this in the IRS instructions for filling out form 2553, S Corp Election by a small business.
Suggest creating a disambiguation page.
70.132.25.230 (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguation pages are only for actual articles, not for definitions or explanations. A DAB page would only be necessary in this case if/when there is an article on "Qualified Subchapter S Trust" itself, or a section in another article which is long/important enough to link to. - BillCJ (talk) 20:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  QSST also means Qualified Subchapter S Trust 

message: ===Multiple shock wave issue===
Stronger shock waves travels faster than a weak shock wave, and the aircraft has to generate a continuum of shockwaves in order to prevent the collapse into one big wave before the shock waves reach the ground. The shock waves are created at the peak of the nose, the cannard, the leading edge of the wings, the wing, the engine inlet. Note how the belly of the fuselage tries to compensate for any irregularities.
===Weaker shock than concorde===
The QSST has a lower mass and as such a weaker shock.
===Aerodynamic Stability===
With such heavy engines thus far in the back it is almost impossible to get the center of mass right. Even if the wings are far in at the aft, large control surfaces are needed to compensate for the fuselage (essentially a balloon with no mass) sticking out in the front.
===Structural stability===
The engines are lifted by the wings, but the whole aircraft would be prone to bending oscillations with the mass distributed so far away from the center of mass. The V control surfaces are a great way to stiffen an aircraft with swept back wings, but as visible in the picture are not swept back themselves and as such have a high drag.
Rest in Peace supersonic transport -- Arnero (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More text 

message: The engines are lifted by the wings, but the whole aircraft would be prone to bending oscillations with the mass distributed so far away from the center of mass. The V control surfaces are a great way to stiffen an aircraft with swept back wings, but as visible in the picture are not swept back themselves and as such have a high drag.
Rest in Peace supersonic transport -- Arnero (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Structural stability

message: this was notable development effort - the article should stay for historical reference as it contains enough information and citations  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awatral (talk • contribs) 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed deletion is premature  

message: This article would greatly benefit from giving the numbers in SI units. Outside the USA, feet and miles are gibberish.
96.22.242.49 (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  numbers in SI
Talk:Ma-Ko-Ko-Mo

message: Here are some basics that would greatly improve this article:
* Basic vital statistics (birth year, death year; parents?, spouse(s)?, children?)
* Ma-Ko-Ko-Mo translates as "Black Walnut" but what is his name in Miami-Illinois language (in the contemporary orthography)?
* childhood family and influences (if known)
* photo or a painting available?
* his political and diplomatic interactions while Chief
* any memorable quotes?
* in-line citation
* references, references, references
Please cross off the list as they have been completed. Thanks. CJLippert 20:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do to improve 

message: Somehow, I don't think the founder of Kokomo, IN was born in 1949.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.251.92 (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page links to the wrong David Foster
Talk:KZND-FM

message: The article originally cited a broadcast date of December 20, 2005.  I found an article citing KZND's (94.7's) initial broadcast date as March 30, 2006; this is consistent with my recollection.  Where did the 12/20/05 date come from?  Was it the date that TATI Broadcasting purchased a permit for 94.7 MHz? Actually, come to think of it, the article also says that American Radio Brokers own The End, but my sources say TATI Broadcasting acquired / stole the station from Ubik Broadcasting. Where did ARB come from? Akbeancounter 02:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box

message: I haven't been able to hear 87.7 in a while.  94.7 is fine, but 87.7 has no audio, no static, nothing.  I wonder if 87.7 is done for good. -- A. 02:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 87.7 Done?
Talk:Charles Edward Hallé

message: Nobody on the Web can seem to decide whether he was Charles Edward or Edward Charles, but I couldn't find an article about him under either name, so.... —Mhari* 02:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Getty Union list prefers Charles Edward and the 1888 catalogue for the opening of the New Gallery says "C. E. Hallé", so I have moved this article.  - PKM (talk) 23:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Hi GLC HANGO here AAANJAF STUDIO (talk) 23:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GLC HANGO
Talk:1957 Georgia Memorial to Congress

message: /Archive1LeonaCatherine (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Is footnote 5 necessary?  The part of the article to which that footnote is attached merely states what the memorial says and outside sources about the truthfulness of its claims seem superfluous as well as original research.  Idag (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear editor Idag: Regarding footnote 5, the long footnote, I would argue that it is not "original research" in the technical, narrow Wikipedia sense. It does, however, appear to be superfluous -- essentially just a recitation of the states that ratified or rejected the Fourteenth Amendment. Presumably this could be covered in the article on the Amendment (and it may well be already covered). This article is of course about the 1957 Georgia Memorial. I may delete some or all of footnote 5 on the basis that the material, while not technically original research, is simply too tangential. Yours, Famspear (talk) 13:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I have deleted the footnote, per this discussion. Famspear (talk) 14:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: "The Memorial, part of Georgia's "continuing battle for segregation,""Georgians 'void' U.S. amendments," New York Times, February 9, 1957. followed the Supreme Court's ruling, in Brown v. Board of Education, that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from discriminating against racial minorities in public schools." - Removed for NPOV. This atricle and subject has nothing to do with segregation. Burk Hale (talk) 23:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Necotowance

message: The article states
Nectowance (ca. 1600-1649) was the Weroance (chief) of the Pamunkey tribe following the death of his father Opechancanough.
but according to John Smith's account in Map of Virginia
His [Powhatan's] kingdome descendeth not to his sonnes nor children: but first to his brethren, whereof he hath 3 namely Opitchapan, Opechancanough, and Catataugh; and after their decease to his sisters. First to the eldest sister, then to the rest: and after them to the heires male and female of the eldest sister; but never to the heires of the males.
So the kingdom could not have been inherited by Nectowance, unless Nectowance were the product of an incestuous relationship between Opechancanough and Powhatan's (Wahunsonacock's) eldest sister, Opechancanough's aunt.
So, was Nectowance actually Opechancanough's son, or is this an assumption made by someone not familiar with the rules of succession operating amongst the Powhatan? 
-- WLDtalk|edits 14:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inheritance
Talk:Rūpa

message: I will question why Rupa is interpreted as 'material objects', and not merely 'objects' or 'things'. To my understanding it refers to both imaginary and material phenomena, all things formative. Rupa is according to Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon also a term for the number One. In modern philosophy I would say 'Singularity'. --Xact (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading notion 

message: Recently, the phrase "as opposed to arupa" was inserted into this article's one-line intro.  Prior to this recent change, this article's one-line intro was:
:In Hinduism and Buddhism, rūpa (Sanskrit; Pāli; Devanagari: रुपा; Thai: รูป) generally refers to material objects, particularly in regards to their appearance.
The recently inserted phrase changed the intro to: 
:In Hinduism and Buddhism, rūpa (Sanskrit; Pāli; Devanagari: रुपा; Thai: รูป), as opposed to arupa, generally refers to material objects, particularly in regards to their appearance.
In general, the purpose of this article's intro is to be abstract enough to span uses of rūpa in both Hinduism and Buddhism.  While "arūpa" is the "opposite" (or "opposed to") "rūpa" in so much that the prefix "a-" can be translated as "not" or "non-" or "un-", etc., in many contexts "rūpa" and "arūpa" are actually complementary categories for describing different phenomena.  For instance, in Buddhism, one will often find three fold distinctions using these terms such as "kama, rūpa, arūpa" (e.g., see tiloka) and "rūpa, arūpa, nirodha" (as in three dhatu); additionally, in terms of jhana, rūpa and arūpa can be used to describe ascending attainments, not "opposite" but incrementally progressive.
Therefore, I deleted the aforementioned newly added phrase ("as opposed to arupa") for its oversimplifying and thus potentially misleading nature. (I did leave reference to arupa in the "See also" section though allowing readers to pursue relationships between these terms, whether oppositional, complementary, etc.)  I hope this makes sense, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 10:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, apparently I was not as educated about it when I changed it....--Dchmelik (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arupa

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Arupa and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 3#Arupa until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Arupa" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:South End Rowing Club

message: The entry says "The South End Rowing Club, founded in 1873, is the oldest athletics club in the western United States."  No, it's not.  The Olympic Club, also based in San Francisco, has that honor, being founded in 1860.  I changed the entry to reflect this. Bricology (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest athletics club?
Talk:Danuvia 43M submachine gun

message: Why not simply title the page "Danuvia submachine guns" or something similar instead of specifically naming it for the later 43M model? It would also seem that it was more inspired by SIG's MKMO and MKMS designs than the Beretta Model 38.--172.191.102.181 (talk) 23:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Saturiwa (chief)

message: I moved the article to the 'Saturiwa' because that name is commonly used to refer to the tribe as well as the man. The previous spelling appears to have been a typo, as the name appears as 'Saturioua', 'Satourioua' and 'Saturiba' as well as 'Saturiwa', but I do not see 'Satouriona' used anywhere. -- Donald Albury 20:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the previous spelling from a book of the plates by Le Moyne. I may have misspelled it, or they may have. But at any rate Saturiwa is a better title, it does seem to be much more common.--Cúchullain t/c 20:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An 'n' for a 'u'. Some typefaces make it easy to switch them. 'Saturioua' looks like the French spelling. 'Saturiba', which I found on a one-sentence stub, may be Spanish.  I want to write up more on the "tribe." This business of the Spanish recording the same name for a chiefdom, the largest town in the chiefdom and the chief, which seems to reflect the practice of the Indians, makes it confusing. -- Donald Albury 16:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move
Wikipedia talk:Editors should be logged-in users (failed proposal)

message: I honestly do think that editors should be logged in users. It'd be sure to help a lot with people ignoring WP:ATT.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 02:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The arguments for

message: Probably most 'named Wikipedia editors' started off as IPs 'seeing how the thing worked' - and many probably make the occasional minor changes and improvements without signing in.
We can all think of reasons why we might wish to be effectively anonymous for particular entries.
Blocking unlogged in editors is likely to lead to 'a multitude of single entry user names' and/or people not contributing at all.
There is, however, a case for 'certain particular pages about topics which generate much discussion and edit wars etc, or where there are special requirements' to require signing in to contribute. 
It is probably impossible to eliminate the 'look-at-mes' and 'drive by nuisances' etc - and if the barriers are too high the effect will be too disruptive (and the more committed nuisances will sign in and be nuisances).
Compulsory signing is only likely to be viable for certain specialist small-scope wikis eg Ganfyd. Jackiespeel (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The arguments against