lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chris Head (musician)

message: This article has not formally been through an AFD as far as I'm aware of, all previous versions of this article have been either vandalism 
(20:19, April 17, 2005 Meelar (Talk | contribs) deleted "Chris Head" ‎ (content was: 'Chris Head is an awesome guitarist, who plays for the band Anti-Flag. He is eternally nineteen.'))
Patent nonsense (00:41, January 3, 2007 Naconkantari (Talk | contribs) deleted "Chris Head" ‎ (A1))
or an article which does not assert the importance or signiface on the subject (# 22:45, November 25, 2007 Philippe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Chris Head" ‎ (Speedy deleted per (CSD A7), was an article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that didn't assert the importance or significance of its subject. using TW)).
CSD G4 does not apply to pages that have not been deleted via Speedy Deletion (Copies of material that was previously deleted after an XfD discussion. Articles that were only previously speedily deleted do not fall under this category.) Therefore this tag does not apply. --Nn123645 (talk) 17:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any plans to expand this article to assert Head's notability outside his band? Two days of "construction" has given us an infobox, a stub template, and two sentences that do not contextualize this article and that are basically just repeating very general information from the article Anti-Flag. What sources do you intend on using to establish Head's notability? What kind of verifiable information do you intend to add? Why should this not immediately be merged to Anti-Flag, as it has has been in the past (only two weeks ago)? --Cheeser1 (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I'm going to make this article into a redirect as has been done for the Pat Thetic article until I have more time to develop a better article. --Nn123645 (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest developing, as you find bits an pieces, an article in your user-space (eg at User:Nn123645/Chris Head) and trying to assemble what might eventually be encyclopedic - if it never gets there (which I might expect) then it's no loss, but maybe over a few months or whatever you might come across some sources or reason for the article to exist. Don't get discouraged - just remember that one good article about Anti-Flag is enough to cover things to do with Anti-Flag, instead of fragmenting it into redundant splinter articles. But if you can write a good, substantive article about Chris Head, I'd love to see it. Best, --Cheeser1 (talk) 03:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion
Talk:Christianity in Laos

message: I think there should be a separate article on Roman Catholicism in Laos. Hence I suggest a merger of the existing articles regarding Roman Catholicism in Laos: Vicariate Apostolic of Luang Prabang, Vicariate Apostolic of Paksé, Vicariate Apostolic of Savannakhet and Vicariate Apostolic of Vientiane. Sarcelles (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Catholicism in Laos 
Talk:Lao Evangelical Church

message: According to the article Religion in Laos, only 1.5% of Laos are Christians. Yet this article gives the proportion of evangelicals as 2%. 216.8.172.35 (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Mission évangélique au Laos

message: Should not this stub be merged with Protestantism in Laos? Sarcelles (talk) 10:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Will do via WP:BLAR.  – S. Rich (talk) 21:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposition of Merger
Talk:Apostolic Vicariate of Luang Prabang

message: I suggest a merger with Vicariate Apostolic of Paksé, Vicariate Apostolic of Savannakhet and Vicariate Apostolic of Vientiane as they are stubs, and there is not a such comprehensive article. Sarcelles (talk) 16:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is nonsense, by this we should also merge all the articles on the provinces of Laos into one, as those are even shorter than these diocese stubs. andy (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with other articles about [[Roman Catholicism in Laos]]
Talk:Apostolic Vicariate of Pakse

message: I suggest a merger with Vicariate Apostolic of Luang Prabang, Vicariate Apostolic of Savannakhet and Vicariate Apostolic of Vientiane as they are stubs, and there is not a such comprehensive article. Sarcelles (talk) 16:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is nonsense, by this we should also merge all the articles on the provinces of Laos into one, as those are even shorter than these diocese stubs. andy (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with other articles about [[Roman Catholicism in Laos]]
Talk:Apostolic Vicariate of Savannakhet

message: I suggest a merger with Vicariate Apostolic of Luang Prabang, Vicariate Apostolic of Paksé and Vicariate Apostolic of Vientiane as they are stubs, and there is not a such comprehensive article. Sarcelles (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is nonsense, by this we should also merge all the articles on the provinces of Laos into one, as those are even shorter than these diocese stubs. andy (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

text: No merger - Each is a separate, distinct entity and deserves its own article. Scanlan (talk) 02:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with other articles about [[Roman Catholicism in Laos]]
Talk:Apostolic Vicariate of Vientiane

message: I suggest a merger with Vicariate Apostolic of Luang Prabang, Vicariate Apostolic of Paksé and Vicariate Apostolic of Savannakhet as they are stubs, and there is not a such comprehensive article. Sarcelles (talk) 16:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is nonsense, by this we should also merge all the articles on the provinces of Laos into one, as those are even shorter than these diocese stubs. andy (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with other articles about [[Roman Catholicism in Laos]]
Template talk:Dark Tranquillity

message: Made by a private person? It was listed as a video, so is it a private video or not? because it looked pretty "official" to me even though it wasn't the real band. I don't think it was made by a fan if that's what you're thinking. --CircafuciX (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private video?
Talk:Laos National Stadium

message: It seems to be some deep mistakes here : there are 2 different stadiums in Vientiane :
* the "new" national stadium, built far north in the suburbs for the SEA Games 2009 and holding 20,000 (see pic)
* the Anouvong stadium ("old" national stadium), in central Vientiane, near Vientiane Tennis Club — most of the article refers to the Anouvong stadium, except for the size : actually it coudn't hold 20,000 (I guess 1,000 people would be too much !). I will try to put a picture of Anouvong stadium on Commons later.
See 2009 Southeast Asian Games for more details.
Chaoborus (talk) 19:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes
Talk:Tassie Medal

message: The article indicates that the Award is not for the 'best and fairest' but just for the best.
news articles from the 1947 Carnival indicate that it was 'best and fairest'.  Maybe the status changed over time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.4.73 (talk) 11:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best and Fairest
Talk:Economy of Laos

message: This page is mainly a copy of the CIA Handbook. DOR (HK) (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 
Talk:Tourism in Laos

message: I've made a new version to reflect copyright concerns - here Mattun0211 (talk) 03:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version 
Talk:Koronadal City

message: Why oh why whoever made this, bothered not to put any effort into writing it in the author's own words and instead copied and pasted from the Koronadal City government website????!?Si lapu lapu (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
6°30'01.96"N
124° 51'.05.58"E 
121.54.38.70 (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
 
121.54.38.70 (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kabankalan City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 07:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Samurai Shodown Sen

message: As there is no official English equivalent title yet, this page title is temporary and up for moving immediately when/if an international name is announced. Please expand/change any info as it is released. Sake neko (talk) 18:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! The page is moved to this new title name. Sake neko (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tentative Title For Page

message: According to Haohmaru and Nakoruru's listed ages on the game's site, this game supposingly takes place two years after the events of the second game. Aside from that, there's little other clues that suggest when exactly this game takes place in the series' continuity. It could be like a KOF:Maximum Impact where it's an alternate universe story from continuity. Well, I'm just listing this here since it's unverifiable for the article but an interesting note for those who like thinking about it. Sake neko (talk) 08:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity?

message: I doubt that SNK will release Samurai Shodown: Edge of Destiny on the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 because of graphics. The home versions should include every single character from the entire Samurai Shodown series as playable characters. It should also feature both English and Japanese dialogue options. 12:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Samurai Shodown: Edge of Destiny coming to PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 because of graphics?

message: The aforementioned title redirects here, but is not mentioned in the article. Was it some working title? Some common fan mistranslation? What? --M.A. (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's pretty much it. Something made up by fans. Sake neko (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a mistranslation or "fan-made" at all.  is Japanese for "flash".WtW-Suzaku (talk) 06:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Samurai Shodown Flash redirect

message: Why is a viking using an ax not considered historically accurate? (talking about the information in the cast of characters section) They may not have been in Japan, but they certainly used axes, and they certainly had a fighting style of their own. That sounds like another homage to a historical fighting style, not something to be compared to J the afro samurai.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.14.69 (talk) 13:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Artistic Liberty?
Talk:Khone Phapheng Falls

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Khone Phapheng Falls, Si Phan Don, Laos, widest waterfall in the world.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 2, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-02. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 20:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: It is sad that such a world wonder has so few pictures and so little text. Thanks for main paging it. Here's hoping. Billyshiverstick (talk) 02:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Pictures. More Story. 

message: I just noticed the the references (at least the first 2) don't point to where they should.  The first reference should be "Khone, Chutes de, Laos - World Waterfall Database" at www.worldwaterfalldatabase.com but instead resolves to (via the internet archive) to "10 spectacular, record-setting waterfalls" at www.mnn.com.  The second reference should be "10 spectacular, record-setting waterfalls" at www.mnn.com but instead resolves to "The 14 Most Amazing Waterfalls in the World" at treehugger.com.  I'm not sure how to fix or flag. Burntnickel (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messed up References
Talk:Ubiquitous robot

message: Hi TheFlyer, I'm delighted to see your work on this page.  Correct me or revert me if I'm wrong, but I believe per MOS we shouldn't cede the term "ubiquitous robot" to any one research group until their work is so compelling that everyone starts using the term that way.   — Dan Dank55 (talk) 18:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dan, Thank you for contributing to my initial edits.  I assume MOS is Wikipedia:Manual of Style, correct? If so, to which specific element of MOS are you referring? This is a minor point however, as I believe your linkage to Ubiquitous computing is correct.  They do seem to be very similar topics and it may well turn out that in time "ubiquitous robot" will becomes an element of the bigger topic of ubiquitous computing though there may also remain subtle differences that would keep these articles separate.  I think your current add to the beginning of the article correctly links the terms and it'll be interesting to see how the articles evolve over time.   One final point. I take some umbrage with your talk statement stating your objection to ceding a term to "some guys in Korea".  These "guys" are academic researchers; I have no reason to believe they are anything but respected researchers and considering that Asia is far more advanced than the good ole US of A with respect to robotics, I think it could well prove appropriate that this term be attributed to them in the long run.  But, we've got the discussion started and eventually the editors of Wikipedia will get it right.  Theflyer (talk) 04:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't believe I wrote "some guys in Korea"...that is exactly the kind of phrase that I would edit out, and give someone a good talking to for saying it.  And you're right, these are very respected researchers, part of the reason that Korea gets such high praise for its robotics research.  I'm a lifelong member of the ACLU, and I'm generally very sensitive to avoiding phrases that could even conceivably be condescending or bigoted.  I changed it to what I meant, "any one research group".  Yes, I meant WP:MOS...and I even got that wrong, I meant WP:Policy.  In the spirit of WP:Neutral Point of View and WP:Conflict of Interest, we can't let any one research group claim to have the one true "ubiquitous robot" when a quick Google search shows that lots of other people have used the term for their robots...at least, not until everyone agrees that theirs is in some sense definitive. Dank55 (talk) 04:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fully agree with your last sentence and thank you for modifying your verbiage to better reflect what you meant to say.  Theflyer (talk) 17:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Biodiversity Conservation Area

message: Substantial overlap between National Biodiversity Conservation Areas and List of protected areas of Laos, huh? Abductive (reasoning) 02:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: From reading a number of sources, I'm wondering if the term National Protected Areas has superseded National Biodiversity Conservation Areas? The Ecotourism Laos website (Lao government-run) refers to the system of National Protected Areas here, though complete profiles for individual areas may still have NBCA in the title. IUCN refers to NPAs here. Lonely Planet's Laos 2014 and 2010 editions discuss the naming change in some detail in their Environment section: "the areas were renamed National Protected Areas a few years ago..."
At ProtectedPlanet.net NBCA names still appear, as here. Though it's unclear how up-to-date their data are and they use a variety of sources (including Wikipedia for descriptions).
My inclination would be to now use National Protected Area. Wondering what others may think. Thanks Declangi (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Biodiversity Conservation Areas now National Protected Areas? 
Talk:Thomas Gioeli

message: Article read that Scarpa Sr. died during the Colombo war. In actuality, he died of AIDS in prison several years later.Rogermx (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected mistake

message: I do not know if this is relevant to this article or the Colombo Crime Family in general, but Gioeli actually has his own blog where he talks about his experiences while he is in prison.  []   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Battlesnake1 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Gioeli blog
Talk:Legion of Super Heroes in the 31st Century

message: brainiac5...YOUR IM YOUR BIGGEST FAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.91.121.174 (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Merge Legion of Super Heroes in the 31st Century into Legion of Super Heroes (TV series)
-- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Legion of Super Heroes in the 31st Century]] into [[Legion of Super Heroes (TV series)]] (2019)
Talk:Richard Saltonstall

message: When I click on the superscript "1," I am directed to what appears to be a generic page with various ads, none of which seem to have much to do with this subject. A search for "Saltonstall" using that page's "search window" turned up nothing. Therefore I propose that (unless someone else can get it to work) this link be deleted, as it appears it is no longer valid.Chillowack (talk) 06:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is a reference then it should not be removed but marked as a dead link using template . See Wikipedia:Link rot for further detail. Keith D (talk) 12:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.Chillowack (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link in footnote 1 appears to be inaccurate 

message: Not sure why the footnotes in this article are so inaccurate--#5 points to some AOL signup page.
If no one objects, I'm going to mark these links as dead and request accurate citations.Chillowack (talk) 08:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote 5 also points to the wrong place
Talk:The Virgin's Lover

message: First, we need a better summary. It's okay to give away the ending; just say "spoilers ahead". I would write the summary myself, but I've yet to read the book thoroughly enough. Also, a section on historical accuracy would be great as I know the book isn't going to be 100% right. Elesi (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AAAAAAAAAAH! THIS ARTICLE NEEDS HELP! 

message: I just added a subheading (feel free to edit it) based on the controversial versus historical facts stated in the book - sorry its not that good!!Sweetlife31 (talk) 07:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sub Heading
Talk:Fenglin, Hualien

message: Clearly this article needs the Chinese script removed and to be improved. However, Fonglin, Hualien is a medium-sized town and there's no reason why it shouldn't have its own English page. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 10:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, every township of Taiwan is notable enough to be written its own article. Chongkian (talk) 01:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion comment
Talk:WBZY

message: Wikipedia is a general purpose website, not a radio hobby/biz fan site.  This article contains way too much detail not of interest to the general public, and no sources.  Suggest that all references to other radio stations, comparisons of various musical formats, first songs played, and the details about translators and FCC rules be the first thing an editor should trim.69.37.68.72 (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Template talk:Politics of the European Union mini

message: Good idea, but at 50% it's far too small to be readable... —Nightstallion 19:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me but I've put it up to 75, Any better?- J Logan t: 10:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye, looks readable now. —Nightstallion 12:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of temples in Taichung

message: Although I have been to many of the places in this article and generally agree with whats already written, this article does need more verifiable info.  Some temples don't even have a picture or any information at all.  Perhapes someone can look it up somewhere?
- Jawen (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Information

message: I noticed that the temple appeared twice under different labels- once under Confucius Temples, and once under Taoist Temples.  So where should this temple be placed?  - Jawen (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wen Chang Temple
Talk:Skardu Fort

message: Seems undue Elinruby (talk) 04:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lavishly entertained?
Talk:Utah Democratic Party

message: I propose to expand this article by adding, for eample, the history section, and the list of "Current office holders" (that i have just started), each of them with its own internal link to a short bio.
Please let me know if you like this idea.Adrian Comollo (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion proposal

message: I propose the Utah Amicus link located in the External links section of the page be deleted.  This isn't an official communication of the Democratic Party.  I believe it was added for page rank of the blog.  Urnman (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion proposal
Talk:UNIVAC EXEC II

message: The article currently claims that EXEC II was written in COBOL.  That's definitely nonsense; I'm 100% sure that it was written in assembler.  Since I don't have any proof, however, I'm just removing the claim.  If anybody can confirm that it's assembler, please update. Groogle (talk) 00:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Written in COBOL?
Talk:Breakthru (board game)

message: I will make notes later on tactics and strategy. Is this article still considered a stub? Wilhelm meis (talk) 19:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove stub tag?

message: Comparing this game to chess is extremely specious - the reference is to a dubious website quote.  Someone who buys or plays this game with that expectation will be flabbergasted.  I just don't think it appropriate to leave that in the intro.  Fox and Hounds is more apropro, it can stay.Sbalfour (talk) 21:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  chess-like??
Talk:Buffy the Vampire Slayer (disambiguation)

message: Is there any way we can have a permanent decision made on which place this is going to redirect to? In the last few months it's gone back and forth several times. --Phuff (talk) 05:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirects aren't permanent, however as this latest movie is basically a middle ground between the people who want it to point to the film and the ones who want it to point to the show, it'll probably keep people happy. Or at least enough of them happy to establish this method as consensus. - Koweja (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now a dab page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.193.90  (talk • contribs) 12:24, 5 March 2009
hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.81.202 (talk) 22:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect