lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Incredulity of Saint Thomas (Caravaggio)

message: At its time, I had received permission to use some of their texts here. Bye. --Attilios 15:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text from www.wga.hu=

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Cactus Writer (talk) 21:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Dear Wiki-Editors,
I'm new to this space, however I'm an expert on old masters art and would like to add some information onto this article about the Trieste version of the incredulity of saint thomas. I have addinional books to citate as well as proofs auf authenticities which I'd like to add to the article. I do not presume myself of editing an article without asking first so this is the reason I'm opening this discussion. Please advise me if this isn't the right approach.
Therese are the changes that I'd like to propose:
- There are two versions of this artwort. One is located in Potsdam, which is the secular version of this artwork and the version located in trieste is the ecclesiastical version. According to Maurizio Marnini the ecclesiastical version was painted for Cardinal Gerolamo Mattei in the year 1602. It differentiates itself from the secular version that was owned by Marchese Vincenzo Giustiniani in the way that the knee to the bottom left is covered. Please see the image below as a reference. This information is from a proof of authenticity done by Mag. Art. Maria Ranacher.
- The format of the Triest version is 118 x 156,5cm
Thank you.
RfoxR (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd like to add information to this article
Talk:Republican Party of Wisconsin

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is poorly sourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. The one source included in the infobox states nothing about the specific political orientation of the party in the state. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox
Talk:St. Peter, Minnesota

message: Hey, I live here in St. Peter.. I'll try to get an image!--Dcole07 04:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I believe the information on John A. Johnson should be incorporated into the John A. Johnson entry, and removed from here.  Some of it is useful information about Johnson, but not about St. Peter.  Eostrom 02:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John A. Johnson bio 

message: The crime data is 5 years old, could someone find current data and put it here? I would ask for newer data for everything, but I understand the problems with getting updated census data...Also, the sections are... rather lacking (except history). It's just not very... done. And, what's with the advertisement-like writing on the State Hospital, and the 'Great Trek'? There are better things to talk about (I live there and have never heard of it). Perhaps 'historical sites' (Cox house?), or the (incredibly cheesy) 'Pearly Gates' deserve a mention? 74.32.226.113 (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update?

message: It's hard to find reputable sources with citations... unless state news fluff pieces count, in which case https://www.twincities.com/2019/03/06/joe-rolette-minnesota-capital-st-paul/
Don't know anything about citing sources though, if this citation is good enough could someone add it?
216.114.249.103 (talk) 15:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the story about the capitol
Talk:Stephentown, New York

message: The Stephentown mentioned in reference [1] seems to be for a different town. The Stephentown in the reference was in Westchester County in 1788. The article concerns a town in Rensselaer County which was formed from Albany County not Westchester.
Humblehelper (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:San Gabriel River (California)

message: The Rio Hondo is more a distributary than a tributary.  As the article mentions water can be made to flow from the San Gabriel River into the Rio Hondo, and did in the past naturally. In fact the Rio Hondo may be best described as an older abandoned channel of the San Gabriel River that still retained some flow from other sources.  It is actually a tributary of the LA river, which it flows into near where it enters the ocean.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.122.240 (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The external link to an individual selling gems was removed per blatant promotion policy. Damotclese (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant Promotion Against WP 

message: The cited source re yellow-legged frog in headwater of San Gabriel river is about the frogs in the Mojave River which is not part of the San Gabriel watershed.  Source has been removed and section tagged. --Mike Cline (talk) 11:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow-legged frog 

message: At first I thought the figures given for unimpeded runoff were preposterously large, until it occurred to me that they weren't necessarily giving the rate per second.  From the context, I assume it was intended to mean the rate per year, but even then, I couldn't reconcile it with the 184 cu.ft/sec given in the Quick Facks table. I'd correct it myself, but I don't know which if any of the figures given is correct.Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 20:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unimpeded flow, in Geography and Characteristics
Talk:Bolivia, North Carolina

message: I removed the statement that the town was built using soil from the country of Bolivia since it has no source cited, was submitted by an anonymous user and seems highly unlikely. If anyone has information on the true origin of the town's name, please add it and cite a source. Pha telegrapher 17:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This area has been, according to Monster Quest, attacked by a bizarre blood sucking monster. 65.173.105.197 (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Monster attack
Talk:Mississippi Masala

message: Hello, I'm Clock 12:13. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit  seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Clock 12:13 (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence you removed is part of the plot of the film Mississippi Masala. Meena tells Demetrius that prior to living in Mississippi, her family lived in England. Please review WP:FILMPLOT which states that details of plot are not sourced. This has nothing to do with WP:NPOV. -Classicfilms (talk) 02:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot detail
Talk:Democratic Party of Wisconsin

message: An encyclopedia should not be written as if it is a party website, campaign brochure or policy platform. Reproducing sections of the party platform, even if correctly attributed and cited, is not appropriate. This information is available on the party's website and does not need to be repeated here. See WP:NOTREPOSITORY, which says, "Wikipedia articles are not:...  Mere collections of public domain or other source material such as entire books or source code, original historical documents, letters, laws, proclamations, and other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, unmodified wording. Complete copies of primary sources may go into Wikisource, but not on Wikipedia. See also Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources...."
Ground Zero | t 02:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source documents

message: The logo listed here was out of date so I removed it. I'm not sure if this is common practice or not. Please revert me if it was a mistake. JamelJones (talk) 06:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo?
Talk:Strathpine bus station

message: The 671, 672, 673, 674 now operate 7 days a week. Could somebody please change this template.  58.108.93.83 (talk) 11:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for raising this.  <B>S<SPAN STYLE="font-size:87%">EO75</SPAN></B> [talk] 12:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thompsons Frequency
Talk:Tomahawk (geometry)

message: How about an actual proof that this tomahawk actually trisects angles ?
How about a proof that if positioned correctly(and how it must be positioned) it will trisect an angle ?
How about an explanation of why translating that is not an euclidean construction ?
All of these lack to get a coherent good rigorous article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.49.179 (talk) 11:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof 

message: I really enjoyed this! Congratulations on our DYK!  Amandajm (talk) 11:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: OK!

message: I'm rating this article as low priority. Congrats on the DYK! Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings Template
Talk:FC Dacia Chișinău

message: There is a stub tag at the bottom of this article, should there be? I think it's at least start-class. Drawley (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub tag 
Talk:United Kingdom prison population

message: The thought came to me, that figures on their own do not convey an awful lot, so I have added some background. I am not happy with it ( it's so easy to go off on a tangent) but I thought it would serve to attract some thought as to what could be added to the article, so that, more sense can be made of it.--Aspro 19:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early history and political influences 

message: I think that the content of "Prison population of England and Wales" should be merged into this article. The scope of this article fully encompasses the other, and both articles are quite short, so a merger wouldn't cause any size issues. This one is actually shorter than the other, and the fact that someone felt the England/Wales article needed to be split is kind of weird. Anyway, I think it is clear that the articles should be merged. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 20:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the prison population statistics are recorded for the UK as a whole though, but rather separately as: England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland. The Prison population of England and Wales article is of a length to merit its own page. There is no reason why the equivalent could not also be done for Scotland and Northern Ireland.--Utinomen (talk) 09:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree with the idea of a merger defintiley --Gerty (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: “for England and Wales, with an average of 14800 people in prison for every 100,000 people in 2006;” implies that 15% of the UK population were incarcerated in 2006, which is infeasibly high. The data for 2015 implies that .1% of the population are incarcerated. I'm going to remove this for now, but if someone has time to look into the incarceration rates compared to the rest of Europe, that would be great. George Makepeace (talk) 18:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section implies 15% of population incarcerated
Talk:Nana, Rajasthan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:Windsor & Eton Riverside railway station

message: : I have included an xlink in the meantime Peter Shearan 15:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sure that I have read somewhere that the row of arches in the wall between platform 1 and Datchet Road were built to allow Queen Victoria's military escort to ride onto the platform. But I cannot now find a citable source for this. Can anybody help?. -- Chris j wood 10:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This was my understanding too, although it is by word-of-mouth rather than by reading. I presume you don't have the appropriate 'branch line' book for the line? EdJogg 13:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'fraid not. I think I have borrowed or browsed a copy at some time, which may well be where my memory comes from. -- Chris j wood 14:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arches in the Datchet Road wall 

message: Looking at some past road atlases showed that at a UK scale there was a connection by rail between this station and W&E Central. Was this ever the case? Simply south (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion at Talk:Windsor & Eton Central railway station#Through to Riverside -- EdJogg (talk) 00:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Through to Central
Talk:Antilla, Cuba

message: Can we agree on a short description for this article? I think the current one is okay ("Town in Holguín Province, southeast Cuba"), although I think "southeast" is unnecessary. Recent edits have introduced variations that I think are too long, and provide excessive detail.
*"Antilla is the smallest municipality in the province of Holguín. Located on the north coast of the eastern region of Cuba. Endowed with myths and legends"   
*"Antilla, smallest town in the province of Holguín. Located on the north coast of the eastern region of Cuba"  
These both include unnecessary detail. And a short description should definitely not repeat the name of the city that's found in the article title.   signed, Willondon (talk)  23:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description
Talk:Mesoderm

message: I think the article overall is missing important sections describing the mesodermal layer in active organisms. Perhaps including references to articles such as this http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24088538 would better expand on the formation regulation of mesodermal organs. I feel like something as important is the mesodermal layer deserves more than 6 sections outlining its entire importance.
I am considering developing this page further as part of an educational assignment in Fall of 2013. If someone else is also working on this, please send me a message and let me know
soon, so we donʼt duplicate initial efforts in page development. Josemags (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: overall

message: Oppose merge. There is much more to say about these subjects, but it is harder for the articles njnj to expand when they are all combined. --Arcadian 18:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Isn't GI tract endoderm in origin?
:Yes. --David Iberri (talk) 23:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: then why is it still on this page? --Sakredfire 05:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Embryology

message: Shouldn't picture description be "Section through human embryo"? Would be more informative, I guess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.163.254.157 (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Not all triploblastic animals have a coelom, like the simplest animals with organs that form from three tissue layers: flatworms. There are three different ways in which the mesoderm is found aligned with the ectoderm and these form a method of categorizing animals into three broad groupings.
*Acoelomates 
**no coelom
**tissues and organs packed between gut and body wall
*Pseudocoelomates (blastocoelomat)
**false coelom
**unlined or partially lined body cavity between gut and body wall
*Coelomates 
**proper coelom
**lined cavity between gut and body wall
Maybe it can be revised and restored? Peter morrell 09:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorizing animals

message: Until I edited, the article was restricted to humans or vertebrates. I've edited the first para, and it's good as far as it goes. The whole article needs a rewrite. I'm tempted, but: I have a "to do" list of invertebrate phyla; doing mesoderm properly, i.e. showing comparisons and contrasts between higher bilaterian taxa, needs more zoology than I know. --Philcha (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still limited to vertebrates. Mesodermal formation on protostomes are entirely omitted. Petter Bøckman (talk) 12:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not restricted to humans or vertebrates 

message: This sentence is broken, but I'm not sure what it was originally supposed to say:
::The paraxial mesoderm forms the somitomeres, which give rise to mesenchyme of the head and organize into somites in occipital and caudal segments. give, sclerotome (cartilage and bone), and dermatome (subcutaneous tissue of the skin).
Any ideas?Myoglobin (talk) 01:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Definition section
Talk:Endoderm

message: Oppose merge. There is much more to say about these subjects, but it is harder for the articles to expand when they are all combined. --Arcadian 18:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I am considering developing this page further as part of an educational assignment in Fall of 
2013. If someone else is also working on this, please send me a message and let me know 
soon, so we donʼt duplicate initial efforts in page development. Blairwal (talk) 22:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endoderm Project?
Talk:San Felipe, Texas

message: "In 1828, the population numbered about 200. The town had three general stores, two taverns, a hotel, a blacksmith shop, and forty to fifty log cabins."
I removed this unsourced statement and replaced it with one accompanied by an inline citation. If someone has a good source, we can change it back. Oldsanfelipe (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 1828
Talk:Barry Windsor-Smith

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: *Data including "X-Men 53 and two Daredevil issues."
*Possible fair-use images, data	
*Poss. f-use images, incl. bio pic
*Possible bio pic	
*ACBA award
*Rune & al data	
Anarchangel (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data dump: links 

message: Any thoughts on whether an index of BWS comics and other publications (prints/portfolios) should be either on this page or a linked page? Surprisingly, there's nothing of the kind available that I can see. The GCD entries are fairly complex to navigate, the Marvel index ditto (and obviously only geared to their publications, so incomplete). His own site dosn't even have a full list of either portfolios or comics.  All considerations welcome, Cheers! Archiveangel (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Index? or not to Index? 

message: : Do you know why the DYK hook that was selected was something that wasn't discussed at all? --FlairTale (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe there was a conversation on the DYK talk page that changed the hook. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know nomination
Talk:The Legend of Chin

message: Today I added a section entitled "Impact".  There's probably a better word for it but I couldn't think of one.  There I detailed out the participation songs off the album played in a movie soundtrack, the participation the album played in the compilation, and the participation a couple of songs played in the greatest hits record, The Best Yet.  I also added the wiki links to the three band members listed in the Credits section.  BazookajoeReno (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Way to Be Human

message: Okay, why does everyone who edits the Switchfoot articles always delete the videos? That is the only way to show the band's videos. And by the way, I've read more than once that the band loves to make videos, so why can we not show them? I'm sorry, but it is getting kind of odd how closely watched these Switchfoot articles are. It takes away so much of the enjoyment of editing these articles. I just had to say this. Not to insult anyone, but to defend the band's articles that are losing more and more of their info and links all the time it seems. Sorry, I just thought I'd get this out there. God Bless.RoryS89 22:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music videos 

message: The sentence that reads 'The best-known songs from this album are the title track "New Way to Be Human", "Company Car", and "Only Hope," which was included in the movie A Walk to Remember.' is totally subjective.  No reason is given why these are the "best-known" songs.  They are not the best-known songs as far as I know.  I'm going to change this sentence to the following, which is more factual: "The song "Only Hope" was featured in the movie "A Walk To Remember"  and the tracks "New Way to Be Human," "Something More (Augustine's Confession)" and "I Turn Everything Over" received substantial play on Christian radio."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiritquest (talk • contribs) 13:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Best-known songs" 
Talk:Nokomis

message: Nokomis is the grandmother of Hiawatha ONLY in Longfellow's poem, which does not conform to Native American tradition.  The historical Hiawatha has nothing to do with Longfellow's poem. comments unsigned by User:Pgscholt
:I sort of agree. The article can be re-worded much better to bring your point up, and yes, the historical Hiawatha was quite different from Nanabozho.  However, if the name "Hiawatha" in Longfellow's poem was systematically replaced with the name "Nanabozho" and then taking away the Christian overtones, especially out of the last three chapters, yes, that poem is very much in the character of the aadizookaan, so in that sense, it does conform to Native American traditions.  Well, your comment was made in April of 2006, the article was tagged for review in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America/Anishinaabe in November of 2006, and we are now just getting to that review.  So, thank you for your patience. CJLippert 17:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled