lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lovers in the City

message: I wonder whether Yodelling Song and Wonderful Shadow should be merged with this article. Vorbee (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: .

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Yodelling Song into Lovers in the City; dated: December 23,  2019. Proposer's Rationale: The article on Yodelling Song does not have much information in it over and above what is already in the article on the album, and is headed by a tag saying it may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Vorbee.  Discuss below. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Lullabies to Violaine

message: This set appears not to include the bonus tracks from the boxed set ("Dials", "Crushed", etc.). Is the statement about "every Cocteau Twins EP from 'Lullabies' to 'Violaine'" therefore inaccurate?
The statement is in fact inaccurate and has just been corrected. WikiUser426 (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't include Boxed Set bonus tracks?
Talk:Ja Rule discography

message: I believe if the (Pain Is Love) sold 6 Million in the U.S., it is certified x2 Platinum by the RIAA. Unless it sold another 3 million after it was certified x3 platinum, I don't understand.
- Obscure888
:RIAA and U.S. sales are different things. It may have sold over 6 million, but that doesn't mean the RIAA automatically certify it. It is up to the record company to officially apply for the plaque. And judging by http://www.riaa.org/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH, it seems they haven't done so yet. It should be 6x Platinum, but if it's not officially certified on the RIAA website, then the article has to go with that. Spellcast 17:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The album named Rule did not sell 6.5 million copies world wide he did not even top any charts outside of the united states he maby sold like 50 copies outside the states  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.95.231.66 (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  R.U.L.E 

message: Christina Milian's "Get Away" with Ja Rule??? Little X directed the videoclip.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.136.67 (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured Singles
Talk:Bob Phillips

message: Judging from the note when the previous article was deleted as a non-notable bio, the deleted article was about a totally different Bob Phillips who was, indeed, non-notable. The present article, however, discusses a prominent Texas journalist. Lawikitejana 17:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the previously deleted article
Talk:All the Greatest Hits (McFly album)

message: Is this the correct title? I haven't found anywhere confirming it yet. Usually they just talk about the "Greatest Hits" album. On play.com it's just called Greatest Hits and on Amazon it's not there yet. --Stacey talk 22:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title?
Talk:Richard Thomas (solicitor)

message: ===Personal financial information===
I removed the following text as it didn't seem notable (£25 thousand pounds isn't a lot of money and his finances are his concern), also the wording suggested there might have been POV reasons for adding it.
The biographical information is taken from the official site, so i will add it back and cite it.
</br>
CaNNoNFoDDa 02:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content changes

message: I removed the following text as it didn't seem notable (£25 thousand pounds isn't a lot of money and his finances are his concern), also the wording suggested there might have been POV reasons for adding it.
The biographical information is taken from the official site, so i will add it back and cite it.
</br>
CaNNoNFoDDa 02:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal financial information

message: I moved the following text (with some minor edits) to the ICO page, as it seemed more relevant to that article.
CaNNoNFoDDa 02:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism of ICO
Talk:Metropolis: The Chase Suite

message: I started construction on the conceptional section for the EP which is an extremely substancial part of the composition and one thta is not currently noted. I may have relied heavily on one reference because despite her talks of the EP on radio shows it seems only a select few sources have listed these. I would like to know why it was removed. Thank You.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiceitup08 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See the article's history to see edit summaries for individual edits and changes made to the article. Dan56 (talk) 23:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conception
Talk:Monster Ballads

message: To the person who wrote the original first disc part of the article, I think you used the "sold in stores version", instead of the phone-order like I got.  Notice the fact the second disc has songs of the first one before you claim it's the first disc.  btw, someone tell me what #13 is because I have the CD, I forgot what the song is and I lost the case, so i can't just look at the song. --Wikistonecolddragon (talk) 05:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sulu Sea

message: Guys, 
Found this site: http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/124_SR/VOLUME/CHAPTERS/sr124_09.pdf 
This is a potential reference to this article.
-Kleomarlo (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional reference 

message: The Sulu Sea (Filipino: Dagat Sulu; Tausug: Dagat sin Sūg; Chavacano: Mar de Sulu; Cebuano: Dagat sa Sulu; Hiligaynon: Dagat sang Sulu; Karay-a: Dagat kang Sulu; Cuyonon: Dagat i'ang Sulu; Malay: Laut Sulu) is a body of water in the southwestern area of the Philippines, separated from the South China Sea in the northwest by Palawan[1] and from the Celebes Sea in the southeast by the Sulu Archipelago.[2] Borneo is found to the southwest and Visayas to the northeast 112.198.12.146 (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Araling Panlipunan 

message: The Sulu Sea is nearly cut off from the ocean.  Did the lower sea level during the Ice Age ever result in the Sulu Sea being cut off from the ocean?  If so, what was its salinity then?  Does its ecology have any special characteristics? J S Ayer (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural History 

message: The article reads: "The Southwest coast of Mindoro to Buruncan Point, its Southern extreme, thence a line through Semirara and Caluya Islands to Nasog Point (11°53′N 121°53′E) the Northwestern extreme of Panay[...]. 
Nasog Point is in Antique. It is located in the southwestern tip of Panay Island. The article must mean Naasug in Malay, Aklan, which corresponds to the 'northwestern' description and the coordinates.
￼ Smcacliong (talk) 02:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sulu - NE limit
Talk:Misakiguchi Station

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. Misakiguchi Station (Tottori) never existed as an article and, now that the station has been renamed Ōshinozuchō Station, the disambiguator is definitely not needed.  I put a dab header at the top of the article just in case someone didn't get the memo. —  AjaxSmack  05:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Most of All: The Best of Deborah Harry

message: Why there is a truncation error in the cover image? I did a google search, and there is 10 results with this cover. Only one is like this, "surprisingly" just en.wikipedia.org result... 85.217.22.185 (talk) 12:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in cover image
Talk:Keikyū Kurihama Line

message: I'm pretty sure at least part of the section south of Keikyu-Kurihama was originally built as a JR freight line, then taken over by Keikyu after the war. There is an abandoned ROW connecting the Yokosuka terminus at Kurihama with the Keikyu main line, and Kurihama seems an odd terminus when you consider that the Yokosuka line was freight-only for some time before the passenger services commenced. Can anyone verify? --- 68.90.45.10 (talk) 05:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  origins
Talk:Beijing–Baotou railway

message: For article names of Chinese railways, the full name of the railway (i.e. both terminal cities) should always be spelled out, rather than merely the two character abbreviation.  When the abbreviations are transliterated into English, essential identifying information is lost.  E.g. 
* Xiangyu, Xianggui, Xiangpu Railways all have different “Xiang” characters; 
* Xianggui and Guikun Lines have different “Gui” characters; 
* Yiwan and Yijia Lines have different “Yi” characters; 
* Yiwan and Wangan Railways have different “Wan” characters;
* Yuli and Yucha Railways have different “Li” characters;
* Baolan and Baocheng Railways have different “Bao” characters;
* Lanxin and Lanyan Lines have different “Lan” characters;
* Jiaoji, and Jiaoliu Railways have different “Jiao” characters
* Jiaoji and Jitong Railways have different “Ji” characters;
* Jitong and Tongpu Lines have different “Tong” characters;
The list goes on and on.  
Many English readers may be unfamiliar with one-character abbreviations of certain Chinese cities and provinces. So Yu for Chongqing, Hu for Shanghai, Jiu for Kowloon adds to the confusion. For consistency and clarity, Wikipedia article names of Chinese railways should always feature the full names.  In-article references can use abbreviated names. The only exception may be the Longhai Line, which has become a two-character word in itself.  ContinentalAve (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agreed on this one, I've generally been changing the names such that they use the full title. NemesisAT (talk) 17:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use full descriptive name of railway for the article names of railways in China  

message: Looking at satellite imagery and http://cnrail.geogv.org/, it appears the line effectively splits into two around Zhangjiakou with Zhangjiakou on one branch and Zhangjiakou South on the other. The Zhangjiakou–Tangshan railway leaves the line east of Zhangjiakou South, not the "main line", as indicated by the RDT. The branches join again at Kongjiazhuang. Just leaving my thoughts here so anyone who's skilled at editing the route diagrams could add this. Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 17:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route diagram around Zhangjiakou
Talk:Beijing–Guangzhou railway

message: For article names of Chinese railways, the full name of the railway (i.e. both terminal cities) should always be spelled out, rather than merely the two character abbreviation.  When the abbreviations are transliterated into English, essential identifying information is lost.  E.g. 
* Xiangyu, Xianggui, Xiangpu Railways all have different “Xiang” characters; 
* Xianggui and Guikun Lines have different “Gui” characters; 
* Yiwan and Yijia Lines have different “Yi” characters; 
* Yiwan and Wan’gan Railways have different “Wan” characters;
* Yuli and Licha Railways have different “Li” characters;
* Baolan and Baocheng Railways have different “Bao” characters;
* Lanxin and Lanyan Lines have different “Lan” characters;
* Jiaoji, and Jiaoliu Railways have different “Jiao” characters
* Jiaoji and Jitong Railways have different “Ji” characters;
* Jitong and Tongpu Lines have different “Tong” characters;
The list goes on and on.  
Many English readers may be unfamiliar with one-character abbreviations of certain Chinese cities and provinces. So Yu for Chongqing, Hu for Shanghai, Jiu for Kowloon adds to the confusion. For consistency and clarity, Wikipedia article names of Chinese railways should always feature the full names.  In-article references can use abbreviated names. The only exception may be the Longhai Line, which has become a two-character word in itself.  ContinentalAve (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use full descriptive name of the railway for the article names of Chinese railways  
Talk:Much More (album)

message: There reads: The album contains among others the winning song from the Eurovision Song Contest 1991, "Fångad av en stormvind".
Actually, not true: the Swedish version does not have it at all, and the international version is listed to have the english translation "Captured by a lovestorm". If the song is indeed on some version of the album, that is not in the article. 109.240.219.96 (talk) 23:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fångad av en stormvind?
Talk:My Animal (album)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved; separate RM may be held to determine whether the film is the new primary topic (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My Animal →  – Disambiguation from My Animal (film) required. 2A00:23C6:880C:E101:F08F:D8D9:E1DA:AEBA (talk) 11:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 October 2023
Talk:Beijing–Shanghai railway

message: For article names of Chinese railways, the full name of the railway (i.e. both terminal cities) should always be spelled out, rather than merely the two character abbreviation.  When the abbreviations are transliterated into English, essential identifying information is lost.  E.g. 
* Xiangyu, Xianggui, Xiangpu Railways all have different “Xiang” characters; 
* Xianggui and Guikun Lines have different “Gui” characters; 
* Yiwan and Yijia Lines have different “Yi” characters; 
* Yiwan and Wangan Railways have different “Wan” characters;
* Yuli and Licha Railways have different “Li” characters;
* Baolan and Baocheng Railways have different “Bao” characters;
* Lanxin and Lanyan Lines have different “Lan” characters;
* Jiaoji, and Jiaoliu Railways have different “Jiao” characters
* Jiaoji and Jitong Railways have different “Ji” characters;
* Jitong and Tongpu Lines have different “Tong” characters;
The list goes on and on.  
Many English readers may be unfamiliar with one-character abbreviations of certain Chinese cities and provinces. So Yu for Chongqing, Hu for Shanghai, Jiu for Kowloon adds to the confusion. For consistency and clarity, Wikipedia article names of Chinese railways should always feature the full names.  In-article references can use abbreviated names. The only exception may be the Longhai Line, which has become a two-character word in itself.  ContinentalAve (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use full descriptive name of railway for the article names of railways in China 

message: To whoever posted the image (or if anyone else knows), where did you get the information as to what stops are "K-level" vs. "T-level".  Is there a defined difference posted somewhere or a station list and it's appropriate level online?   –Nav  talk to me or sign my guestbook 07:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In Chinese... — LlywelynII 14:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Passenger_rail_transport_in_China#Classes; K = Kuaisu (Fast), T = Tekuai (Express). Also, I think replacing the image with a  would be more consistent and useful.--Kakurady (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also a lot of service changes has happened since six years ago when the image was created, with many new services running on the new parallel high speed railway. --Kakurady (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "K-level stops" vs. "T-level stops"
Talk:Qinhuangdao–Shenyang passenger railway

message: For article names of Chinese railways, the full name of the railway (i.e. both terminal cities) should always be spelled out, rather than merely the two character abbreviation.  When the abbreviations are transliterated into English, essential identifying information is lost.  E.g. 
* Xiangyu, Xianggui, Xiangpu Railways all have different “Xiang” characters; 
* Xianggui and Guikun Lines have different “Gui” characters; 
* Yiwan and Yijia Lines have different “Yi” characters; 
* Yiwan and Wangan Railways have different “Wan” characters;
* Yuli and Yucha Railways have different “Li” characters;
* Banlan and Baocheng Railways have different “Bao” characters;
* Lanxin and Lanyan Lines have different “Lan” characters;
* Jiaoji, and Jiaoliu Railways have different “Jiao” characters
*Jiaoji and Jitong Railways have different “Ji” characters;
*Jitong and Tongpu Lines have different “Tong” characters;
The list goes on and on.  
Many English readers may be unfamiliar with one-character abbreviations of certain Chinese cities and provinces. So Yu for Chongqing, Hu for Shanghai, Jiu for Kowloon adds to the confusion. For consistency and clarity, Wikipedia article names of Chinese railways should always feature the full names.  In-article references can use abbreviated names. The only exception may be the Longhai Line, which has become a two-character word in itself.  
ContinentalAve (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Python eggs (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Agreed to use full name of the city, and the abb as redirect. Matthew_hk tc 08:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed – conventions for understandable descriptive names are important.  Matthew, please note that WP is not in the business of making up "proper names", so no need to cap things like "high-speed railway"  in descriptive titles, per WP:NCCAPS.  Dicklyon (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

text: http://www.gov.cn/fwxx/ly/2010-12/14/content_1764981.htm instead Beijing Harbin line was safely lower cap as it was composed of different railway route . Matthew_hk tc 22:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use full descriptive name of railway for the article names of railways in China 
Talk:Nil Recurring

message: The original cover is not black & white. Please, find a better one than this. Synesthetize (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover replace 

message: "Normal" was actually the first song written for FoaBP, however it's didn't fit, and it was reworked into "Sentimental."
YouTube Interview : Starting at 7:00 minute marker.
I attempt to transcript the section of the interview.
: Your other question about the "Normal"/"Sentimental" thing. The fact there are two songs that use the same chorus. "Normal" actually came first. And was written ...  well it was first first song I wrote for the Blank Planet album. And it's quite long and complicated, well not massively complicated, it moves through various different sections. And when the rest of the album came together, there were a lot of songs like that, around the 7,8 minute mark. And because Normal had quite a strong chorus, I actually felt what would work better would be to take that chorus and build a must simpler, stronger, I suppose more direct song around it and that would fit better with the context of the record because it would be something a little different.
So "'Normal' was composed entirely by Steven Wilson as an alternate version to 'Sentimental', the last one was finally picked for the album." would not be correct. "Sentimental" would be the alternate, if you want to use that comparison between the songs 208.78.5.146 (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentimental as an alternate for Normal 
Talk:Rose Petal Place

message: Saw a little mistake in this article, which is otherwise great!
The second series dolls were not commercially released, just distributed in extremely limited numbers as marketing samples and prototypes.  The line was discontinued before they appeared in stores.
The second series doll the article calls "Shy Violet" is actually "Sweet Violet"
Some more info and photos here: 
Galacticatt
Galacticatt 17:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Howsham Hall

message: This section was removed from the article. Needs citations and NPOV Triwbe 17:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The School
Talk:Yangbajing Tunnel

message: Could someone add the various Chinese pronunciationslike we have at Fenghuoshan tunnel and the IPA?  Also, this is missing Standard Tibetan: pronunciation. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: For reasons I can't fathom, the Yangbajing Tunnel isn't on this list.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: A particular source
Talk:O3: A Trilogy, Part Two

message: This album is entitled O3 Instead of O₃. The subscript 3 is usually formatting, but there is an unformatted unicode character ₃. O3 could then redirect to O₃. I don't know how to do this. Can it be done? -- Chris Brack :P (talk) 01:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Title from O3 to O₃ 
Talk:Xinhua Road Sports Center

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was no consensus to support move. JPG-GR (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Suggest that further discussion might take place at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Blanks in place names. Andrewa (talk) 16:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Rina Banerjee

message: The Rina Banerjee Wiki page is not written objectively.  I see a lot of issues where liberties are taken to describe and interpret Banerjee's work.  I feel as if the page could be greatly improved if these interpretations are connected to specific critics, and then cited. --Djr42 (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor comment

message: ( Copyrighted text removed )
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Art:Aditi (talk • contribs) 14:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content on this Talk page duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://rinabanerjee.com/home.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  21:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Omry Maak

message: Every single bit of information in this article hasn't verified ANY source and some of it seems false to me. Your so called link to the so called professional reviews from forums and simple text messages/opinions are completely pointless. In addition, the singles from the album are completely false. Blytonite (talk) 21:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: You MUST verifiy the information
Talk:Bréguet 270

message: Yes, but what to call the article, as French manufacturers used confusing designation systems, incorporating sub-type numbers into the main designation, taking the type number out of a natural sequence. I suggest 'Breguet 270 series', as Breguet 270 was the actual designation of the prototype/s.Petebutt (talk) 03:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger