lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Operation Attleboro

message: An IP has added the following wording with this (and other) edits :
:"However, U.S. body counts was problematic at best, fraught with intentional incurracies at worst (double counting, exaggerations, and diffcult terrain all made body counting an imprecise technique for measuaring progress). The Vietcong simply refused to fight, and Attleboro did not break the NLF's political hold in Tay Ninh province, a point that few U.S commanders realized at the time. Once U.S combat units left, NLF quietly returned. Reducing the NLF fighting power had not diminished their political influence within the local hamets and villages."
This is taken very closely from the source provided (Daddis "No Sure Victory", p. 7) which includes (see link: ):
:"Relying on body counts in Vietnam, however, was problematic at best, fraught with intentional inaccuracies at worst. Possible kills, double-counting, estimations, exaggerations, and difficult terrain all made body counting an imprecise technique for measuring progress... While General Du DePuy though Attleboro had crippled the 9th PLAF Division, after the first week of November the Viet Cong simply refused to fight... Reducing the Viet Cong's fighting power had not diminished their political influence within the local hamlets and villages."
Consequently I have removed this information. There are other issues with these edits though, for one adding flags to the infobox contrary to WP:INFOBOXFLAG, and the addition of "Strategic U.S failure" which is cited to Daddis but after I checked (per the edit summary of another IP who previously reverted the addition as well - strangely also an IP 101?) I don't see this wording supported by the source. The source no doubt questions the lasting political effect of the operation but doesn't anywhere say write that it was a "Strategic U.S failure". Anotherclown (talk) 06:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close paraphrasing / COPYVIO removed
Talk:Adel Chedli

message: His second caps (or a cap in official match) should in 2004, which the new FIFA statutes came in force in January 2004. Matthew_hk tc 18:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: National team
Talk:Operation Masher

message: Noticed a big change that happened, in which no justification seems to be given except "reverted to last good edit".66.229.17.212 (talk) 03:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Viet Cong claim they evaded the operation is as correct as the Allies claiming operational success. No ref is given that says that the operation was an Allied strategic failure. The C-123 is included in the aircraft shot down, it does dot merit separate mention in the Infobox. We do not list in the Infobox artillery rounds fired nor comments like "Primarily small-arms and a few 12.7mm weapons. Including "Probably Includes Civilians Listed As Enemy KIA" is POV pushing. Changing "counting 127 PAVN bodies after the battle" to "claiming 127 alleged PAVN were killed after the battle" is deliberately misleading and incorrect change.Mztourist (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

text: okay should have provided that reason initially, i don't know if other users agree to it or not since nobody particularly seems to care so much or don't want to dispute this. but no need to undo everything else which is cited, no need to WP:GAME or try to roll back edits since you aren't an admin. 66.229.17.212 (talk) 04:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: My explanations are clear, do you have any other comments to make before I revert you? Mztourist (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not clear at all, nobody reads your mind. this isn't even the issue I'm raising, delete that part then if you feel so strongly about it, but completely changing everything else is not justified when you delete cited content. you are being a bit crafty there with this blatant changes while hiding behind one or two reasons, i don't care what kind of changes you make but reverting much more than the reasons you justified is WP:DISRUPTIVE. go read the guidelines and debate individual points if you are still feeling that emotional about it. 66.229.17.212 (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't seem to want to discuss specifics, just to criticize me for making changes generally. As per WP:BRD you can either discuss the specific points or drop this and go off and do something useful. I would note that A bicyclette who made these changes originally didn't bother explaining any of them.Mztourist (talk) 06:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

text: I have made my changes point by point, explaining each in the edit summary. If you have a problem with any of them discuss it here. Mztourist (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary Reverts without a good cause is vandalism 

message: I propose to merge Battle of Bong Son into Operation Masher. Battle of Bong Son is an unnecessary fork from Operation Masher, with most of its content already included on the Operation Masher page. Mztourist (talk) 03:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.Smallchief  (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Battle of Old Byland

message: WHere DO these numbers come from? They do not seem to be derived from any contemorary chronicles and are mosty certainly gross exaggerations. It is very unlikely that ant Scottish medielval army amounted to 20,000 men, or any Englsih one to 48,000. CB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.178.156 (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Figures
Talk:Battle of Chalgrove Field

message: Most of this is copied from other articles, massively over detailed and often factually dubious. I've rewritten it. 
Robinvp11 (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: *"Before continuing with the ‘Battle’ go to George Nugent-Grenville, 2nd Baron Nugent and read ‘Nugent the Historian’. Lord Nugent has published total fiction regarding the battle of Chalgrove. Stevenson and Carter Oxoniensia vol 38 1973 is based on Nugent’s interpretation and is cited here extensively which leaves this article with questions to answer. Macaulay, Warburton, Drinkwater, Hugh Ross Williamson, John Adair and English Heritage Battlefield Report : Chalgrove 1643 - 1995 rely near exclusively upon Nugent’s fictitious account."
*"Wikipedia’s administrators could review the pages in ‘history’ from 19 April 2019 and earlier under the name of John Hampdens Regiment and re-instate them. These pages were consigned to ‘history’ and replaced with this interpretation of Chalgrove which has proven to be a fictional account." 
This was originally added to the article page. I have removed it from the article page and placed it here for discussion. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is another attempt to insert material rejected previously (under the name John Hampdens Regiment). Robinvp11 (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I just figured I would let editors more familiar with this article deal with this issue.--Kansas Bear (talk) 14:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information added by user:John Chalgrove
Talk:Talbot Hobbs

message: little bit on Hobbs  Gnangarra 05:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1903 
Talk:Mohammad Al-Shalhoub

message: Assalamu alaikum.How are you brother?
Your face like same for me.Much of saudi people says your face same to same Saudi football player Mohammad Shalhoub.
SUBHANALLAH,Allah creation for many people like same to same.
Jazakallah. 188.248.69.126 (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myself
Talk:Hussein Abdulghani

message: This stub needs to be merged with Hussein Abdul Ghani. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.229.6.51 (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, needs cleanup   A M M A R  12:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hussein Sulaimani and Hussein Abdul Ghani are the same player
Talk:Demographics of Djibouti

message: Hi , I've restored the previous version in line with the source used here 2 states that, "The most sizable minority are the Afar, followed by the Gadaboursi and the Issaq". [Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1988, (Washington: U.S. Department of State, 1989), p.95.] I've made the edit in line with the source and corrected the language. 
Regards,
Wadamarow (talk)
User:BubbaJoe123456 Wadamarow (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics section
Talk:Mohammad Massad

message: تتميز منطقة الأغوار بغنائها الفريد والنادر بالثروات الطبيعية والتنوع الجيولوجي والارثي التاريخي في المصادر الزراعية والمناخ المتميز والسياحة باانواعهاالعلاجيةالمائيةالرياضيةوالمواردالبيئيةقل نذرها في منطقة الشرق الأوسط بل والعالم قد تنقل الأردن المصاف لدول المتقدمة أذا تبنت الحكومة الأردنية واسترئجيات وخطط وبرامج واطلع في مسؤوليتها بخلاص دون مراوغة وهروبها من مسؤوليتها أمام الشعب الأردني وإذا قامت الحكومة بجذب استثمارات من خلال الشركات الدولية ورجال الأعمال العرب ذات الخبرة والقوة بشؤون النفط والغاز والموارد البحر الميت المستخدمة صناعة التجميل وعلاج واستثمار في الموارد الجيولوجي والزراعية والقطاع الزراعي الذي يعتبر عنصر أساسي في تامين الأمن الغذائي للشعب الأردني وسمعة الإنتاج الزراعي في منطقة الأغوار الجنوبية والأغوار بشكل خاص من الفقر والجوع والعوز والجهل البطالة والشعب الأردني بكاملة قد تساهم تطوير تنمية الأغوار الجنوبية اذا كان هناك نية صادقة للحكومة باستغلال خيرات وثروات الأغوار الجنوبية قد تودي لرفع المستوى المعيشة للمواطن الأردني بمسويتها كالبناء الخليج أوروبا بحسب تأكيدات الباحثين الخبراء في مجال النفط والغاز والثروات الطبيعية والزراعية والسياحية والإرث التاريخي والحضاري الذي يشكلها البحر الميت كااعجوبة وأيقونة تاريخية على كواكب الأرض كا اخفض منطقة في العالم غنها الحضاري التاريخي كا حضارة سيدوم ولوط وحف وراء وصحو راء أكد رجال الإعمال المصرية الجنسية دكتور محمد ضحي والمهندس زهير صادق ونقابة الجيولوجيين الأردنيون غانة هذا المنطقة بالثروات والاستثمار باهى ومنشداتهم الحكومة عبر الإعلام الأردني حيث يتسئال أبناء منطقة الأغوار الجنوبية الحكومة لماذا التهميش منطقة الأغوار الجنوبية طالما هناك مقومات تمن عيش كريم وتنمية شاملة ومتكاملة ل أبناء الأغوار الجنوبية وأبناء الوطن كافة لماذا أيها المسئولون القائمين على إدارة الدولة الأردنية لتامين العيش الكريم كملة الدستور الأردني للشعب الأردني إن يعيشوا عيش كريم هاهم أبناء الأغوار الجنوبية أصبحوا أبناؤها يفخرون ويفتخرون أصبح في بيت من البيوت يحمل شهادة علمية ويعون بان منطقتهم ينبوع من الثروات والخيرات توفر لهم عيش كريما مرة أخرى لماذا هذا التهميش والحرمان ان تكون منطقة الأغوار الجنوبية تزهو بالرخاء والعيش الكريم ولرفاه بدلا من الجوع والفقر والجهل مقدمة المقال أميرة احمد سليم خلفيات من منطقة غوار الصافي رقم الهاتف 0777351362  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.247.76.140 (talk) 23:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Lebanon (Kentucky)

message: The coordinates given are the site of the historic marker, near the railroad depot where much of the action took place.  GeorgeofOrange (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Demographics of Mozambique

message: We all know that "African" is not a coherent ethnic group, come on lads, we have to do better than that. There are some articles online detailing the different ethnic groups but I haven't found rough percentages but I'm sure they exist somewhere.
Someone who knows more about Mozambique than me could do with fixing this as if we're saying "African" is an ethnicity we might as well say "Eurasian" is, too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:D09E:2800:8D6A:6D8F:7F16:8504 (talk) 19:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity Section Needs a Re-Work 

message: Template:Largest cities of Mozambique has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 11:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of "Template:Largest cities of Mozambique"
Talk:King Hussein International Airport

message: Aqaba is an airport that can handle the largest jets. Photography is not permitted at the airport. Even though it does have a viewing gallery it is almost impossible to see anything because of sand storms that cling to the windows.
What kind of statement is that? Tottaly uncoherent, possibly a translation error?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.24.32.53 (talk) 09:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

message: I assume the airport is named after King Hussein. If anyone has sources for this, please add it to the text. Taketa (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  named after? 

message: I looked at the airlines's websites i didn't see that those airlines operates flights to Aqaba.
Some airlines for example: 
Air Berlin- http://www.airberlin.com/en-GB/site/start.php ( Air Berlin do not operates flights to Amman this is a code-share agreement with Royal Jordanian)
Air Baltic-http://www.airbaltic.com/public/booking.html <Br>
Condor:http://www.condor.com/eu/index.jsp 
Edelweiss Air:http://www.edelweissair.ch/en/destinations/map/ 
--Friends147 (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aqaba Airport Destinations 
Talk:List of reporting marks: C

message: I have seen many pictures of cars with reporting mark CAEX, which is not in the list. BudgieJane (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This list is incomplete
Talk:List of reporting marks: M

message: MNCX 002: Mystery train car, super heavily reinforced, in an underground facility near the infamous M42 facility under Grand Central Terminal. Reported on the History Channel, "Cities of the Underworld: New York", 2007, aired November 25, 2007, 8:00-9:00 pm MST. LanceBarber (talk) 03:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MNCX is already defined in this list according to the AAR designation.  While it is interesting that a car carrying this mark is reported to exist under the station, the fact is not relevant to this list.  Slambo (Speak) 12:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MNCX
Talk:CA Bordj Bou Arréridj

message: le CABBA ne porte pas le manteau de aidel d'ailleurs c'est une entité autonome qui a été créée pour faire face à l'injustice coloniale donc elle est et restera le patrimoine de tous les bordjiens car depuis le départ des gens honnetes qui ont eu le merite de faire acceder l'equipe pour la premiere fois de son histoire en division une il ne reste que ceux qui aiment leurs interets dans l'equipe.Enfin je voudrais dire merci à ces messieurs en l'occurence :djaafar boualem et boudechicha smail parce que c'est grace à eux que le sport bordjien a gagné ses lettres de noblesse  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.221.16.136 (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Stade du 5 Juillet 1962

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved   (non-admin closure)  JC7V (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: July 5, 1962 Stadium →  – Requesting moving the article to this redirect, Stade du 5 Juillet 1962. The stadium is more commonly refereed to as "Stade du 5 Juillet 1962" rather than the the current name, "July 5, 1962 Stadium", even on non-French sites. Ben5218 (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 December 2018
Talk:Chapursan

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.travel-culture.com/pakistan/chaporsun.shtml. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 19:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Gallery of sovereign state flags

message: I have seen the flag of Costa Rica with the coat of arms many times. Should it have the coat of arms or should it be left off? OMGShay 92 (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconding this and extending it to Peru, Bolivia, and Venezuela as well. The civil flags without the emblems are official and used, but the state flags seem to be much more common in use as a de facto all-around national flag Crazy Boris (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the flags of Bolivia, Costa Rica, and Peru have been changed to add the coat of arms, but not Venezuela; should the flag with the coat of arms also be used for Venezuela? Cloudcounter (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Costa Rica have a coat of arms on their flag? 

message: I have removed the table with 'See also'-links to 'Sovereign state flags in [year]' galleries at Commons. The reason is that these galleries have gotten completely out of hand. In the last couple of months, they have been expanded and filled up with unsourced 'Other entities', 'Other cultural', 'Sovereign U.S. states' (sic!) etc. to the point of being made completely valueless for an encyclopedia. T*U (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to galleries at Commons 

message: Many odd edits have been made on February 23rd, 2024 (Template change, some flag images changed, etc.). Should we revert them ? ChaseYUL99 (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as it was easier to edit the flags as an image gallery instead of a gallery template. For the nth time (talk) 10:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits made on February 23rd 

message: These two are territories of UN recognised countries. I don't think they belong in this article. Can someone please clarify why they should remain, as I'm thinking about deleting them. For the nth time (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cook Islands and Niue 

message: Edit request. 108.160.120.64 (talk) 23:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks. Malerisch (talk) 23:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jamaica and Japan out of alphabetical order.
Talk:Strong prior

message: This stub is listed as a philosophy-related article but also has had mathematical connotations for years.  The author of this article should either improve the quality of it or the article should be removed, since it gives no information that could not be gleaned from the mathematical context or the the philosophical context. Astrobayes 12:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this stub exist?

message: What does this mean? Unfortunately in the context, it could mean "uniform prior probability" or "uninformative prior probability"... Which one is the real one? (And, I guess it's possible that the uniform prior is also uninformative only if we didn't actually know that say it was dice, or cards or something, in which case, I guess uniform prior, is still an informative prior?...)
69.200.230.14 (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Uniformative prior probability"?
Talk:Parfait d'amour

message: I've started an article on this drink, expecting that it wouldn't be difficult to find enough information on the drink to get a reasonable-length article out of it. Alas, I've been finding it extremely difficult to find any good information on the drink, (apart, of course, for about 20-30 cocktails that use it). Does anyone have any idea as to possible references that I might have missed that could give this article a boost? -- Kirby1024 12:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Further checks now identifies Dubuisson: L'Art du distillateur et marchand de liqueurs (Paris, 1779), p. 283 (avail. through Google Books) as the earliest source for Solmini as (a?) creator, and cochenille as colouring matter.  (Further information may be available in Encyclopédie Méthodique (Paris, 1788), but it looks like it is largely taken from Dubuisson.) Athulin (talk) 08:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

text: I think that should be avoided: it may fit an article on cocktails, but if it doesn't provide any authoritative information (i.e. good sources) for Parfait d'Amour itself it would seem to be somewhat off-topic, and will probably be removed in the future. Athulin (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Cassar

message: The stats are blatant nonsense. The assertions are blatant nonsense. The article is blatant nonsense. --Dweller 12:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense
Talk:Chimera (virus)

message: Is this a real term pertaining to viruses or is it from that awful Tess Gerritsen novel? Sloverlord 21:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Real term?

message: I've cleaned up the article, found and cited the original notice to which the text refers, and added a section on the Chimera virus as it appears in Mission: Impossible II to avoid any confusion among readers or editors.  Nevertheless, it looks like this article isn't notable in any way and has nothing vital that ought to be integrated into other articles on vaccines or viruses.  If anyone has more information or a reason why the article ought not be deleted, please either edit or provide a reason here and remove the tag from the article.
I've added a Warning of proposal of deletion to User Talk:DoLittleDoc. Tiresias BC 11:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a real thing and is probably related to this technique in biotechnology. I can look into it more and see if it seems worth keeping. juanTamad (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for deletion 

message: To add to this article:  mention of the term "recombinant virus."  Some articles seem to mention this term in combination with, or as a substitute for the term "chimeric virus," so explanation in this article is warranted. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Flixton railway station

message: There is conflicting information here. Was this station closed and totally demolished in 2001, or does it still exist and only parts of the station removed? Simply south 12:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Station (more of a Halt really) still open, the pub (called The Station) was the building that burnt down. 132.185.144.120 12:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Clarion (heraldry)

message: I found a picture here.  --Doradus 12:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The clarion is clearly a thumb harp, they're very common in Africa, in fact we thought they were newish (in the grand scheme of history) African instruments but this indicates they very well may be European in origin. It's basically tuned pipes with strings, wire, or metal forks attached to them, so that when you pluck them they resonate through the tuned pipes. Besides it looking identical to most thumb harps out there, the 'poetry' mentioning the wire gives it away. LW. 124.190.207.57 (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not often I get to answer an age old question. 
Talk:Tunisair

message: *
*
* 
--Jetstreamer  11:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article 