lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:First-person view (radio control)

message: Should FPV be broadened to include the video-piloting of all forms of vehicles, not just aircraft? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.142.210.209 (talk • contribs) 
:Yes, if there is significant use of this term outside of the remotely-piloted aircraft community.  Nimur (talk) 19:41, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Howdy, I am considering adding a section to cover the legal aspects of FPV for Australian users with respect to both the frequencies and power levels that are legal and the flight requirements of CASA, our air safety board. Is this something that is suitable for inclusion here or is there a better place for the information to go? I doubt it's notable enough for its own page but since it's Australia-specific it's going to make the page look oz-centric. Given the uk-based detail I guess it's going to be ok but wanted to check first. AshleyGittins (talk) 12:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so I decided to Just Do It® - please feel free to suggest (or make) improvements or advise if it's not suitable for inclusion. AshleyGittins (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of regulation and safety with detailed regional information

message: Claim "there has never been a recorded incident..." needs citation to include date this was asserted. As popularity in this sport increases this is sure to become a false statement at some point.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linhartr22 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Regulations Section
Talk:Li Na (Daughter of Mao Zedong)

message: This character has alternate pronunciations of Nè and Nà. The former may be more common and a basic dictionary may only show that pronunciation. Both are shown on the Wiktionary page, and in more thorough dictionaries. In this case the correct pronunciation is Nà, not Nè.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E8%A8%A5
"訥 (simplified 讷, pinyin nà (na4), nè (ne4), Wade-Giles na4, *4)"
Please do not revert again. Quelcrime (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Municipality of San Mateo Atenco

message: they need to be merged... actually both articles were written my students from the same class... so how this happened, I have no idea.  The article San Mateo Atenco is more complete and was the final project of this class.  The easiest way to take care of this problem is simply to delete this version.Thelmadatter (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:San Mateo Atenco

message: OK.. as I stated on the talk page for Municipality of San Mateo Atenco, both of these articles were written by the same students.  This version was the final project handed in and is more complete. The easiest way to fix this is simply delete Municipality of San Mateo Atenco. Thelmadatter (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Habitual be

message: "Habitual be is the nonstandard use of zero copula or an ivariant be..."  Should that say "invariant" instead of "ivariant"? 152.19.189.90 (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Which is more correct when referring to a community of people?Paul, in Saudi (talk) 03:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be "blacks" without any capitalization, as the name refers to their nominative identity/skin color and does not derive from a specific name, despite the word being used as such. Should it be capitalized, it would have had to derive from people who, for example, set up an organization under that name. Basically, colors are not names, but are used for nominative purposes in denoting characteristics. 2601:2C6:4501:BD50:4941:CB74:7C61:56CB (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

text: Some black people prefer to capitalize "black" as a method of empowerment. It has no grammatical foundation. Though, I am not sure it is "politically correct" to say "blacks" at all (instead of "black people") when referring to race, anymore.199.120.30.207 (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Blacks or blacks?

message: Can anyone help? - with knowledge of the subject and/or access to the sources?
I’m doing some small help-the-reader stuff - clarifications, occasional links, etc.  And the following paragraph, in the article‘s  section on Hypothesized sources, seems to need it!:
 Criticism of the hypothesis [that habitual be simply diffused into New World Black English from Hibernian English, through contact in the Caribbean] stems from the fact that there is no evidence that be was used as a habitual marker in the past or is used today in Caribbean creoles of English.[4] Instead, Caribbean English speakers use the preverbal does to mark habitualness. They use be only as filler between does and the sentence's predicate.
This seems to locate Caribbean usage *out*side the scope of the article (“Caribbean English speakers use the preverbal does to mark habitualness. They use be only as filler between does and the sentence's predicate.”)  I’m not sure the article generally is consistent with that?  And it’s in conflict with the article’s opening sentence, “Habitual be is the use of an uninflected be in .. Caribbean English to mark habitual or extended actions.”
I’m not sure what meaning is intended.  If anyone can explain, here, I then plan to amend the article accordingly.
- SquisherDa (talk) 14:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypothesized sources / diffusion from HE
Talk:STK11

message: I've been doing research on AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) for several years and have only read of LKB1, never of STK11. While that might be the name of the gene, I recommend this page be retitled LKB1, and the redirection pages swapped from LKB1->STK11 to STK11->LKB1, to reflect real-world use of the LKB1 terminology as dominant and more commonplace.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.53.241.15 (talk) 19:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconding this comment, I think swapping the redirects would be better suited for the content. Ilovearchives (talk) 09:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Law of Bangladesh

message: Law of Bangladesh is primarily in accordance with the English legal system although since 1947, the legal scenario and the laws of Bangladesh have drifted far from the West owing to difference in socio-cultural values and religious guidelines. In November 2007, Bangladesh has successfully separated the Judiciary from the Executive but several black laws still influence the rulers in creating Special Tribunals in using several black laws including the Special Powers Act.
What are "black laws" in this context?  This term should either be explained in this article, linked to a different article to explain the term, or removed. --thirty-seven (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black laws? 

message: We want to enjoy rule of laws which bear fair and good justice. Adv.Nahid Hossan (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule of law
Talk:A130 road

message: As a consequence of the Chelmsford North East Bypass scheme several roads are being renumbered. 
The A130 now runs from Canvey Island to the Howe Green interchange (J17) on the A12. The A130 designation north of the A12 is abolished. What was the A130 from the Boreham Interchange (J19) on the A12 to Little Waltham is now five sequential roads:
1.    Colchester Road,
2.    White Hart Lane, (un-numbered),
3.    From the roundabout at the west end of White Hart Lane northwards is designated the A1016,
4.    From where the new A131 joins the Essex Regiment Way (‘Costa’ roundabout) northwards is designated the A131,
5.    From the roundabout where the Braintree Road meets the Essex Regiment Way the road to Little Waltham is designated the B1008.
The A131 now runs from the Boreham Interchange (J19) on the A12 north then west around Beaulieu Park to join the Essex Regiment Way, then north on what was the A130. From where the Braintree Road meets the Essex Regiment Way the A131 retains its designation.  
https://www.essexhighways.org/highway-schemes-and-developments/highway-schemes/chelmsford-schemes/chelmsford-north-east-bypass Alnitak3 (talk) 12:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A130 renumbering
Talk:Whole-body nuclear scanning

message: Previously an author put this page to redirect to magnetic resonance imaging. But this is not quite right. Most often (always?) "nuclear scanning" would refer to scanning with radioactive isotopes. Maybe this page should be erased? Since I have changed a link there is no inbound links to this page anymore. — fnielsen (talk) 18:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NFL standings since AFL–NFL merger

message: The standings represent only games that have occured after the merger.  Super Bowls I-IV (in which Green Bay won two and Kansas City is 1-1) happened before the merger and are not reflected in the chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LizardKingOfTheHighway (talk • contribs) 21:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Merger 

message: This is probably the BEST time to count NFL wins and losses from since the Superbowl is probably the most definitive championship for football.  Every championship from the era other than the merger (including the pre merger Superbowls) can either be contested by a rival league, be argued as an exhibition game or the championships were simply *voted* upon by sportswriters with no playoff system.  The modern day Super Bowl is an undisputed championship if there ever was one in sports. ColdRedRain (talk) 06:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Not a pun, but a literal suggestion to merge this page into (and turn it into a redirect to) NFL win–loss records. Pretty redundant to have them separate when we can have this as a section in a general article. Soulbust (talk) 17:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:1964 Philadelphia race riot

message: Poorly sourced, one-sided article.John Paul Parks (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: One-Sided Portrayal

message: I do not specifically dispute any information in this article. However, much of it is clearly told from a particular point of view, without citation.
"After Bradford refused to comply with the two officers' orders to move the car, because the car had stalled, and she was unable to drive it, an argument ensued."
Pick one:
*She could have moved the car, but would not do so.
*She was told to move the car, but could not do so.
We seem to have a muttled version of the two.
"The officers then tried to physically remove Bradford...A man tried to come to Bradford's aid by attacking the police officers..."
So the cops were just trying to move her and were attacked? Whose version of events is that?
"withdraw from the area rather than aggressively confront the rioters" 
This assumes the only options were 1) aggressively confront rioters or 2) withdraw.
"Outnumbered, the police response was to withdraw...774 people were arrested"
They arrested 774 people without even being there?
"Business activity in North Philadelphia declined even further after the riots,"
This assumes, without citation, that the riots caused the decline, though it states the decline was already underway ("declined even further").
"The Brewerytown neighborhood has also been suggested as a possible site of gentrification."
Er, what? By whom?
"This riot was one of the first in the civil rights era and followed the Rochester race riot and the New York City race riot."
It was a civil rights riot? Says who?
Mdbrownmsw (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Mouton Cadet

message: The first paragraph of the History section also contains a fragment, a non-sentence.116.28.60.87 (talk) 12:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You were right. I think this is fixed. MURGH disc. 23:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion header
Talk:Dip (exercise)

message: I do not believe that the latissimus dorsi muscles affect this exercise in any way. Those muscles pull the arms toward the back. In the dip, the arms move toward the back when the exerciser is lowering his body, in which case gravity is doing the work, not the latissimus dorsi. The main muscles which contribute to the execution of this exercise are the pectoralis major (from the bottom to about three quarters of the way up) and the triceps. The triceps do relatively little in the lower portion of the exercise and increase in significance as the exerciser straightens his arms out. Near the top, the pectoralis major does little if anything. At no point are the latissimus dorsi contributing in the execution of the dip.
Raoulduke25 (talk) 18:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Latissimus dorsi

message: This article, in addition to being incorrect on matters pertaining to muscular mechanics, does not show proper subject/verb agreement throughout. A "person" is singular and "their" is plural. You cannot say, "A person supports their weight," if the antecedent of the pronoun "their" is "person". That is not proper grammar. 
      
And WikiPedia most certainly does NOT support this absurd non-grammatical nonsense. The website listed was WP:GNL but that website uses they and their by pluralizing both subject AND predicate, not just one or the other. Read the link! It says: "Pluralizing (not “A player starts by taking up his position”, but “Players start by taking up their positions”), although this can be problematic where the text needs to emphasize individuals, or where it creates a need to switch regularly between singular and plural."
Raoulduke25 17:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper subject/verb agreement

message: Found this page for variations. Not sure if this is a good source though. Can someone please take a look? Thx, Traintogain (talk) 02:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for variations 

message: The diagram in this article gives me body issues. Couldn't you find a drawing with someone that looks a little bit more normal? -User:85.250.33.83 17 November 2014
:lol, feel free to replace with another ··gracefool💬 07:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: — Assignment last updated by LongCruiser (talk) 02:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age
Talk:Pittosporum eugenioides

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Branches of the Russian Imperial Family

message: This article lists people as morganatic who according to one interpretation of Romaonv house laws are dynasts and who consider themselves as dynasts. - dwc lr (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you intend to suggest deletion or changing name (e.g., Branches of the Russian Imperial Family) or delete some people?  Or don't you yet decide it? --Motsu (talk) 22:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely a WP:RM then add additional branches like Maria Vladimirovna's and others if there not listed.  - dwc lr (talk) 22:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: pov
Talk:Japanese citrus

message: As this is a list, should not the article be renamed List of Japanese citrus?--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is room to add more descriptive information, so that it will not be solely a list. I see you did not object to the failure of whatever "bot" deleted all the "Japanese citrus" categories to substitute "Japanese ingredients" categories (leaving some Japanese citrus fruit articles with no category at all). That's really too bad. Badagnani (talk) 03:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as more information will be added.  Try not to be assertive with comments such as that btw, you know me to be a excellent editor and saying something like that is not appropriate.  I am a full-time grad student taking 18 credits, I don't spend all day on here watching everything going on.  I do have a number of final papers due and as such, Wikipedia is not my top priority.  Someone pointed out the category deletion issue with Japanese citrus on my talk page so I came and took a look at it, I apologize if you are taking my response personally, but if you had brought this issue to me on my talk page I would have addressed it as well.  You are always welcome to add tags on yourself, that is part of the process of being on Wikipedia.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC (talk) 04:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

text: You did comment on the deletion page that the category had no merit, then when the categories were removed, the proper upper-level categories were not replaced. I can't count the number of times this has happened, and no matter how many times I comment to the closing admins or editors running the bots, they will never correct themselves. You can see some sample discussion in this vein at User talk:Cydebot. If it's always just me asking that the categories be properly substituted after a subcategory deletion, it really doesn't work well. I did comment on this and you did not back me up. Badagnani (talk) 04:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: Should the word "pomelo" be moved from Banpeiyu to Zabon, as the latter is the generic Japanese word for pomelo whereas the former is a cultivar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homusubi (talk • contribs) 12:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banpeiyu vs. Zabon
Talk:Jarrett Irons

message: Kenny Irons and David Irons are nephews of Leroy Jackson.  Can anyone confirm whether Grant Irons, Jarrett Irons and Paul Irons are also nephews of his?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD)  19:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

message: At this time, I feel that the article does not meet GA standards. There are some important things missing, such as his date and place of birth. Those things may seem minor, but a GA is supposed to be comprehensive and provide all of the necessary details. As well, I'm not entirely sure what the point of the "Michigan school Career tackles record" section is. He's only on the list once. If there were a bunch of players after him who came close to breaking his record, then maybe the section would be justified, but there are only two players on the list who played after him. -- Scorpion0422 20:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review
Talk:Dopamine receptor D2

message: Why is ketamine not included in the list of agonists? It's a pretty important example IMO.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.67.95 (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ketamine

message: I added a new section describing about both active and inactive forms and their differences.
The last paragraph in this section needs significantly more references to substantiate the assertions made. The one reference given only covers schizophrenia, and the reference is from 1975. Whoever wrote those last sentences in the last paragraph, please provide references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:285:8100:778:3D4E:AAAD:4107:547 (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active (D2HighR) and inactive (D2LowR) forms
Talk:Dopamine receptor D3

message: Is there any significance to the form D3 versus D3 versus D(3) (all of which appear in the article)? Peter Grey (talk) 03:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to write D3 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jessyyyyy227 (talk) 23:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3307 Adv Writing for the Sciences 14214
Talk:Submarine squadron

message: It seems to me this sentence:
> The officer in charge of SUBRON ONE is designated Commander Submarine Squadron One or COMSUBRON ONE.
is incorrect.  The billet is called that, but is not the actual officer assigned to it referred to simply by the name of the squadron itself?  Or is Tom Clancy wrong in all those "Task Force 77, arriving" calls he relays as that task force's commander boards a ship? :-)  --Baylink (talk) 23:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the quote is correct.  The officer who commands the squadron is Commander Submarine Squadron XX (COMSUBRON).  Reports to and orders from the squadron are addressed to / received from COMSUBRON XX.  The officer is also the personification of the squadron so he is refered to as SUBRON XX.  When I served aboard USS Will Rogers (SSBN-659), the arrival and departure of my commanding officer was announced on the 1MC as "Will Rogers, arriving (departing)".  Similarly when the Commadore came aboard the tender (or came aboard Will Rogers), the announcement was: "SUBRON 14, arriving".Trappist the monk (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billet/officer - any Navy files 'round?
Talk:Cotton diplomacy

message: The article states, "This embargo was effective at first, creating an instant source of income from the valuable cotton backed bonds, shutting down hundreds of textile factories, and putting thousands of people in Europe out of work, but the embargo became a disaster for the confederacy when the British did not cave in to their demands, choosing instead to import cotton from Egypt and India in 1862."  Yet the sources listed make it clear that there was a surplus of cotton in Great Britain, and some of the source I have read for my research indicate that there was enough cotton for Great Britain to seel it to the Union as well as meet their own needs.  For these reasons, I doubt the statement that thousands of people were put out of work in Europe.  TDStewart (talk) 12:23, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy
Talk:Dynamic network analysis

message: This page seems a bit CMU-focused, anybody have problems with me adding a bit of a wider background?
* Nope, this would be great :) Hypotroph (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a surprisingly high number of mentions for Kathleen Carley, perhaps this material could be tightened up a little. Robbiemorrison (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:St. Vincent de Paul Church (Baltimore, Maryland)

message: Bearian (talk) 19:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

message: There is currently a separate article St. Vincent De Paul Roman Catholic Church (Baltimore, Maryland) created in 2009.  I think it should be merged in here, as this article, now named "St. Vincent de Paul Church (Baltimore, Maryland)" is older and has the older edit history to save.  This article was at St. Vincent de Paul Church previously to my making a disambiguation page there, just now. The two articles are about the same church at 120 Front Street.  The current name of the church is St. Vincent de Paul Church, with no "Roman Catholic" in the name, I see from the external link. doncram (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  I created the article with RC in the title.  I'll take care of the merge.  Sorry for the oversight.--Pubdog (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merger proposal
Talk:Sarah Whatmore

message: This article reads very much like a piece of journalism, so I've added the  templete. TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled