Talk:A Gift to Young Housewives

message: The 1992 "Classic Russian Cooking" version has historical information, but is not available at any library local to me. --W.marsh 17:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: --Superdantaylor 22:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes no, the famine of 1921-1922 was associated with the devastating civil and First World War and there was no "diy way, as it you wanna brioche style" in the USSR, this is just schizophrenic nonsense and the author of the article contradicts himself , since The Book of Tasty and Healthy Food was published in the USSR even before the war in 1939, and not in 1952, as Wikipedia says, and therefore in no way in the USSR after the war, cookbooks could not be considered "bourgeois anachronism", just like the Molokhovets book itself was criticized by certain authors, but not government officials, for a certain "bourgeois-noble bias", which made sense since her books, in fact, were accessible only to the upper strata of society and this is no more than 10 percent of the country's population, since the majority they couldn’t even read normally, and if they could, they simply couldn’t afford to buy most of the food described in the book, and the actual shortages and long lines do not belong to the early post-war USSR, but to the late USSR with the greatest peak of problems during perestroika, but with all while in the USSR, recipes and cookbooks were available to the general reader due to urbanization and literacy by the majority of the population and, in general, most of the recipes in books, although with difficulty, ordinary citizens could bring to life and in general for 65-90 years the level of consumption and nutritional standards in the USSR grew and, in fact, Soviet books were not based on the Molokhovets book, and here you contradict yourself, so you say that in the USSR it was almost banned, although this is not so 37.54.230.242 (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russians under communism 

message: What exactly is the value of this article? If we start including articles on every book on cooking, gardening, home decoration are we really writing an encyclopaedia? If WP didn't keep on changing the procedure for nominatination for speedy deletion I would do it now - unfortunately, I'd have to go and learn the process all over again. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 12:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In its own unique way this Russian cookbook is a classic history text describing the Russia of its time.  It reflects certain lifestyles of its time.  It ennumerates the profusion of fish and game species available in Russia.  It catalogues the various foreign influences on Russian cuisine and its diversity within itself.  It is also a book that is not readily avaiable and accessible to the common reader/researcher.  These are a number of reasons why coverage of this book - in my opinion - is merited in Wikipedia.Moryak (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . Your brief 5 lines here in the talk page make for far more interesting reading than the article itself. Were it not that it would immediately be seen as original research, I would easily copy this summary of yours into the article! Perhaps if you have the book it could still be done, using page references as sources. Having said that, I still find the "Table of contents" unencyclopaedic, perhaps it could be written as text, highlighing the more intesting elements, following the line of thinking that you outlined above:
===lifestyles of the time===
===foreign influences on Russian cuisine===
===fish species available in Russia=== 
===game species available in Russia===
===etc===
Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for deletion 

message: Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: etc

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A Gift to Young Housewives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021194920/http://nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/recipes/molohovec/ to http://nuclphys.sinp.msu.ru/recipes/molohovec
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified