lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nanna

message: There is no need for this page to take part in the mess over at Mesopotamian mythology.  I'd prefer this page link to the redirect until the happy day that the Sumerian gods get their own pages. -Acjelen 03:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sumerian god

message: In Australia at least a lot of adults use the word Nanna to refer to their grandma.  I'm not sure "babytalk" is a good way to describe this usage. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.131.111.154 (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As one can read in the Baby talk article, baby talk is used by adults and does not refer to the babbling done by children learning to use language. -Acjelen 05:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: baby talk?
Talk:Renault 8 and 10

message: Someone has created this page -but the information is probably best captured here. Anyone want to have a look at this? Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Merge - no doubt about it.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Renault Model 8 & 10 Alconi]] 

message: As has been haltingly proposed in the past (by Mike Peel in November 2021, by Franek in 2005) these two should be split. They may share a core and layout but are obviously different cars, with separate histories. Also see EVERY OTHER LANGUAGE article on the Renault 8; none combine these two. Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it needs someone to WP:BEBOLD. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done, thanks. Feel free to improve (I think the R8's competition history should m much more extensive, for instance).  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed 

message: Contents WP:SPLIT into Renault 8 and Renault 10.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Makgatho Mandela

message: New York Times reports he is survived by four sons, not three children as is currently here.  See this link.  Sandover 00:53, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He had one son by his first wife, and three sons by his second wife. Probably someone forgot to add in his firstborn. - Nunh-huh 01:30, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How did he get the HIV virus? 80.213.99.208 17:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infection 
Talk:Darkness

message: In The White Tiger, Aravind Adiga calls the Indian countryside the Darkness.
Should be mentioned here.
Is is widely used in this way?
Freetrader (talk) 20:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Darkness - Indiae 

message: I think, technically, darkness is the absence of light. Theory_of_Colours page states "From the Newtonian standpoint, darkness is an absence of light." 63.224.251.40 07:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposite or Absence?

message: old lead...[Darkness is the percepted state of being dark or the absence of light. The emotional response to an absence of light has inspired metaphor in literature, symbolism in art, and emphasis.]
I'm removing this and replacing it with referenced facts.  percepted?  Is that even a word?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawstubes (talk • contribs) 21:49, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  lead rewrite. 

message: seriously, a physicist...  to help explain darkness???  What is this, kindergarten?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.85.222 (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: removed 'help physics'

message: Hey I created an account just to post this; I don't have the skill or experience to edit this this article, but why are all the images on this page strictly religious? I'm a Christian myself, but this is just weird. I understand the "Cultural" section including that religious iconography, but couldn't we come up with some other pictures a little less... in your face religious? Why not include an image of the Earth's light and dark halves seen from space instead of, say, the odd and slightly out of place religious art piece as the first image on the article?
Sorry if this is nit-picky.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Statisticalnormality (talk • contribs) 20:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatever Happened to Secularism?
Talk:Peter Atkinson (politician)

message: if someones going to mark this page as contentious, they should perhaps bother to say why. i could take a few guesses, but to me it seems more 'incomplete' than wrong. please say what the problem is.
Should a link to a site obviously proposing direct action really be included?
----
I agree.  "Veal calf action" link probably shouldn't be included as this is not neutral and largely irrelevant for an encyclopedia entry.
--Knthrak1982 21:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone verify that the MP actually did read from a telephone directory from a reputable source? It does sound something that was interesting enough to be picked up. AlbertSimon (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telephone Directory
Talk:Cow (disambiguation)

message: Why does the cow page say 'Got milk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!' on it? This is vandalism and really isn't very informative.
:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was consensus against move.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Got milk?
Talk:Aum namah Sivaya

message: *"The name Siva means "One who purifies everyone by the utternance of His name." Alternatively, Siva means the Pure One, who is not affected by the three gunas (characteristics) of Prakrti (matter), Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas."
This revelant information on Siva (relevant because it's important and because I didn't know that, and I read a lot about Siva!) could be added to the entry Shiva, what do you my fellow wikipedians think? Actually, it relates more to Siva than to Aum namah Sivaya. Sugestions? --Subramanian 02:52, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cükätaw

message: I had a few problems cleaning up this article. 
* I changed "Jukataw" to "Juketaw" since Google gives almost no results for the former (mispelling or alternative Anglicisation of Russian?). Searching for "Cükätaw" gives "Juketaw".
* "The city was situated on the right bank of Kama" could be reworded as south, north, west banks etc. I couldn't find any information on the web that wasn't from wikipedia.
** What is the Kama? A river/valley/hill? 
* Is "Chistopol" mean to be "Christopol"?
* The article could be clearer: is it closer to Chistopol or to Danaurovka?
The article could do with a lot of expansion. For example: foundation/what was traded/why did Batu Khan decide to attack the city?
Grox 03:28, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dog crossbreed

message: I tried to check page 285 of the source myself using google books, while I can only view page 285 and not 286 it doesn't seem to support the paragraph it's used as a source for.
https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=dgwZqclDWf8C&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PP285&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false Traumnovelle (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity of source #18? 

message: The insertion of 'based on the eugenics principles' seems biased and incorrect. Pedigree breeding cannot be qualified as wikt:eugenics and whilst the sources label it as eugenics that seems to be the author's own opinion/label rather than one from fanciers of the period. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased phrasing. 

message: The redirect Cockeranian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 04:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Cockeranian]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A cavachon is mix of a Cavalier King Charles spaniel and a bichon frisé 75.69.237.193 (talk) 22:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you want us to do with this information? Cavachon is listed at list of dog crossbreeds. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  cavachon
Talk:Breaking Benjamin

message: Add "In 2023, Breaking Benjamin were inducted into the Luzerne County Arts & Entertainment Hall of Fame. They were among the first class of inductees."https://www.timesleader.com/news/1603775/luzerne-county-arts-entertainment-hall-of-fame-announces-inaugural-class Kiwiadavaz (talk) 04:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 09:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, they're a platinum selling that tours stadiums around the world. That they made a small county's hall of fame probably isn't that noteworthy in the scheme of things. Sergecross73 msg me 12:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2024
Template talk:Uncategorized

message: Greetings and felicitations.  The current recommendation is that this template be placed at the bottom of articles.  However, this contradicts MOS:SECTIONORDER (and MOS:LEADELEMENTS), which state that cleanup templates belong at the top of an article.  
1. Before the lead section[...]
: 3. Maintenance / dispute tags
The bottom of article is where editors look for categories, but it is not where most of us look for article-wide cleanup templates.  Placing this cleanup template at the bottom of articles also buries it where it won't be seen, especially in longer articles and narrower browser windows.  Please, let us change the placement to be in line with the MOS and logic. —DocWatson42 (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement redux 

message: The placement of  and  is the subject of an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#RfC: Category maintenance templates in MOS:ORDER. Options suggested include specifying that they should go at the bottom below stubs, or below categories but above stubs, or not be mentioned (ie by implication go with the other maintenance templates near the top). PamD 09:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of this template 

message: There seems to be something odd about the way this template ends up being worded when transcluded into an article. I added it to :Miroglypha newly created uncategorized articleand the wording of the template is given asThis has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar s. in which the final word seems to have be left out except for the letter "s". Of course, it's quite possible that I added the template incorrectly, but the same thing is seen in other instances of the template's use in other articles (e.g. Rajula Tallavalasa, :Precision diagnostics, :Semistable reduction theorem). The last word could "articles" or "ones", but it should be something more that "___s". -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template's wording 

message: Please revert the changes in Special:Diff/1094667280 (i.e.,  should be changed back to  and the capitalized "Category" in the "#ifeq" statement should be changed back to the lowercase form "category"). Those changes are causing the error in articles reported above. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be looked at by editor . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 03:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Gonnym (talk) 04:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 28 June 2022 

message: It would be helpful for searching for uncategorized pages. Abdullah raji (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we make some kind of list for uncategorized articles?
Talk:Toyota ZZ engine

message: I would like to know where this info have been taken...
The output of the supposed 1ZZ-FED is not because of the engine itself, but because of the better Exhaust manifold fuond on the celica and more agressive/less economic air-fuel ratio in the comupter
Also the fact about the 1ZZ-FE using a cast aluminum intake manifold... That was on older '98 '99 corolla with the old 1ZZ-FE
I Think that the 1ZZ-FE was the one found on '98-99 Corolla and the 1ZZ-FED (still called 1ZZ-FE by toyota on their website because it's only an improvement and not a new motor) was an improved one for 2000+ model including celica and later the matrix etc...
_______________________________________
I belive the Toyota Corolla uses the 1ZZ-FE engine not the 1ZZ-FED engine. This is both because I own a 2004 Corolla and remember the out put being quoted at 130hp as well as the Toyota_Corolla page states this as the engine used. -Bryansix
:I think you're right, I'll correct it. Krupo
The edits made on 13:25, 4 May 2006 by anonymous were mine, forgot to sign in.  Bradenmcg 13:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the list of Toyota Engine suffixes, the designation D would give it twin downdraft carbs. Is this a true suffix or just a variant of the FE?
Irott 06:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FED Suffix confustion 

message: According to POWERTRAIN, the 3ZZ-FE engine is produced not in Japan, but in Deeside, UK. Lots of interesting details can be found in the above mentioned article (pages 20 and 21), for example about where important parts needed for the engine are produced.
89.12.58.139 20:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3ZZ-FE engine is produced in Deeside, UK, as of 2002. 
Talk:Central High School

message: The article that was previously here was moved to a title with the correct name. The Central High in Traverse City actually is called "Traverse City Central High School", so that's where the article was moved to. --Ctachme 06:08, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old comment

message: Since this is a disambiguation page, I reorganized the page to have the schools specifically named Central High School at the beginning. Other schools with alternate names have been moved to their own section. If someone wants to re-integrate these lists I understand, but please do not revert to the previous format, as there is information that has been added to the article. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:39, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization
Talk:Toulon

message: Toulon is the sunniest town in France mentioned on this page:
http://www.the-france-page.com/france/annual-hours-of-sun.html
3082 is a lot of sunshine for that latitude. It is more than San Diego. This is surely worthy of note?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.106.195 (talk) 16:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: Hi i'm Emily Smith i live in Yorkshire at the moment i'm sat in a cool room filled with computers theres a slight thumping in the air coming from the school hall which is filled with flashing lights and noise.Cool, really ,but not for the thumping heads of the teachers who have engured with the noise all day long!
I'm on this site because i had to do a project about Toulon, it sounds like a really tranquil but busy town and i wuold love to go. Not as much bas i would like to go to Brazil though! I have been facinated by Brazil since i was in Year 2 ,but unlike most wierdos i refuse to go on mastermind because i learn and am interested in actuall Brazil.Not the goverment and dates of battels ect, i love Braziul and hope to work as a fashion designer or buisness women over there.
:Hey that sounds cool! You'd better focus on Brazil, because, between you and me, Toulon is one of the ugliest towns in France. It might be close to the French Riviera, but the town itself has close to nothing to offer. At least that's my personal opinion.... olivier July 5, 2005 19:41 (UTC)
can get a much better satellite picture using google earth.  is it allowed to use google earth photos?
Swatoa 00:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid not, these photos are not free. Rama 09:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right,this page is NOT for public use! 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Toulon]]
Talk:EMC Winton-engined switchers

message: I intend to keep the Winton-engined switchers in here until we have enough material for separate articles, which I don't think we do, yet.  —Morven 06:01, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
:Hmm, do we now?
Will the Winton-engined switchers go into a new EMC category? Or is that too confusing for the average reader? --SSW9389 10:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article intent
Talk:The Crusader (album)

message: Is the official title of this album The Crusader or Crusader? I get conflicting answers when I go to different places.
Greaser 06:24, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eldar (Warhammer 40,000)

message: Unfortunately, despite years of effort to encourage editors to approach the subject from an out-of-universe perspective, as of today this article still consisted almost entirely of material drawn entirely from the 40k sourcebooks. In the end, the only way to prevent that from happening seems to be to remove all of the in-universe material and start with a core which is purely from a real-world perspective. I've now done that. Editors who wish to read about the intricacies of the Eldar are encouraged to visit any of the large number of lively external wikis which deal with 40k now: a simple web search for "40k wiki" returns plenty of excellent resources. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 19:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-universe material removed 

message: How come there is no reference to Tolkien's "original" Eldar ?? ♆ CUSH ♆ 22:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolkien???? 

message: The Information about both Eldar and Dark Eldar having a 5th Edition Codex is wrong. Dark Eldar received a Codex in 5th Edition, the Eldar Codex is still 4th Edition. The current Edition is the 6th.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.74.73.96 (talk) 09:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information about Codices 
Talk:NGC 2403

message: *SUPPORT change the name to the real name. It is just a catalogue entry after all 132.205.45.110 19:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Messier 86

message: I deleted the expansion label request, I think its enough to warrant not being requested now that it has pics and an infobox. →ubεr nεmo→ lóquï 01:39, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
Hmm... If distance and apparent dimensions are known, isn't it possible to calculate the actual size? 85.217.34.203 (talk) 19:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Messier 88

message: This article lists M88 as 47 ± 8 Mly (14 ± 2.5 Mpc) away, yet NED lists it as 64±20 Mly (19.7±6 Mpc) away. -- Kheider (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Distance: 47Mly or 64 Mly?
Talk:Messier 90

message: NED gives a drastically different distance than is cited in the article: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/nph-objsearch?objname=m+90&extend=no&out_csys=Equatorial&out_equinox=J2000.0&obj_sort=RA+or+Longitude&of=pre_text&zv_breaker=30000.0&list_limit=5&img_stamp=YES
gives Luminosity Distance        : 1.22 Mpc      (m-M) = 25.43 mag
and D (Local Infall)           :    1.84 +/-   0.15 Mpc      (m-M) = 26.32 +/- 0.17 mag
1.22 Mpc = ~4Mly, not 60.  I'll correct it in the article, but could someone let me know how it got to be 60 Mly? --Keflavich 22:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: DO not trust NED's distance estimates, especially for galaxies in the Virgo Cluster such as NGC 4569.  NED's calculation are based on flow-corrected distances which are going to be inaccurate for the environment around the Virgo Cluster.  This galaxy should be listed as much further away.  I am reverting the article.  Dr. Submillimeter 22:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for reference NED 2010 now gives REDSHIFT-INDEPENDENT DISTANCES when avaliable. NED shows a distance of 13.3 ± 4.9 Mpc (43 ± 16 Mly). -- Kheider (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance
Talk:Messier 91

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 23:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I think the distance cited in the article is incorrect.  NED gives a luminosity distance of 11.1 Mpc, or 36 Mly, not 19 Mpc as given in the wiki article.  The citation for the distance given is more recent than the NED distance, but I was unable to find the distance listed in the paper.  Could someone clear this up for me, i.e. help me find the distance listed in the paper if it was there?
Thanks,
--Keflavich 22:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On page 685 of the article it has in the table that NGC 4548 has a distance modulus of 31.42 ± 0.54 which should convert to the value in the article if you do the computation.  Per Dr. <mm do not put much faith in the NED distances for galaxies.  WilliamKF 22:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

text: NED uses a flow-corrected distance model that is not going to work for galaxies in the Virgo Cluster.  The peculiar velocity of the galaxies is too high.  M91 (NGC 4548) lies right inside the Virgo Cluster.  The SBF estimate is going to be much more reliable anyway.  Dr. Submillimeter 23:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance 
Talk:Messier 103

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead section is confusing, because it gives two different estimates for the number of stars. It says "There are about 40 member stars within M103...", but two sentences further, it calls Messier 103 a "172-star cluster". While estimates for the correct number do vary, as mentioned in the article further down, the lead should give exactly one figure. Renerpho (talk) 00:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing lead section 

message: Looking through the peer reviewed literature the age of the cluster seems to be somewhere between 16-22 million years. Using info from one of the more recent papers I'll change the age from 25 million years to 22 million years. Jjnishiyama (talk) 21:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: Much of the text in this document has been plagiarised from the website by Thompson Robert Bruce Thompson  , M103 (open cluster in Cassiopeia). some of this is paraphrased, but there is also a lot that is taken word for word. This was done by TitanOne on 13 April 2011. This article needs to be revised with new references, and also re-written to have viewpoints that much broader in scope. Itchycoocoo (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarised Text
Talk:Messier 95

message: Question: What is N for the statement 'this galaxy is the Nth closest galaxy'? Around 100?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.218.141.140 (talk) 13:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the 'N'? 

message: The data from the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database looks suspect for this galaxy.  I am going to think about what to use as a better alternative. GeorgeJBendo 12:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information fro NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database 

message: An new object that appears to be in a spiral arm has emerged.  This is suggestive of a supernova.  Spectra still needed to confirm that it is a supernova.    68.97.20.13 (talk) 01:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Supernova (possibly type 2)