Talk:Preikestolen

message: Not sure if you wikipedians would call this a neutral point of view problem or in need of wikifying, but this article sure aint objective. examples: -"To experience its majesty, hike up to it!" and "Once you reach the top you are rewarded twice. Once with the amazing view. A second time knowing you have made it. The only thing left is to get back down.". Reads more like a travel brochure than a factual overview of the place. I'm not sure what wikepedia policy sugest in this kind of situations, but I'dd guessed I could at least report it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.132.44 (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Nice to have the local name - but what's it mean?Skookum1 (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: translation of ''Hyvlatonnå'' please

message: There has been at least one death on the climb up.  When you get close to the top, there is an area that was very narrow and precarious.  A young man fell here and a wooden bridge/path was built in his honor.  His picture is still on the side of the bridge.  This is the area where there is now a chain bolted to BOTH sides of the path for your hands to hold on to, and the wooden path.  Be careful of the wood as it gets very slippery when wet.
The rocks going up and down can be very slippery.  There are a LOT of rocks.
This Norwegian Hike should be considered as mountain climbing for 99% of Americans.  It is actually a 10 KM hike up and a 10 KM hike back.  This is a seriously steep climb in three places.  The final edge to get around to get to Pulpit Rock is a mere 4 inches wide and is crossed one person at a time.  Luckily, about five feet below this is an area that you can fall to and not plunge to your death.
With proper fitness and footgear the climb is easily done in under two hours.  I actually saw several people that obviously decided that signs were not meant for them.  I saw one pair of flip flops(Man), one pair of raised heals(woman), and five pairs of slippery ballet style shoes(women).  This was when I descending and was actually looking at people's footwear once I knew what to expect.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.31.242 (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2011 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Preikestolen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120714003637/http://www.aftenposten.no/reise/article4281222.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/reise/article4281222.ece
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060818031217/http://www.preikestolhytta.no/index.php?fo_id=3012 to http://www.preikestolhytta.no/index.php?fo_id=3012
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: PULPIT ROCK 2A00:23C4:D41E:1E01:9168:C7CD:49B6:F77 (talk) 09:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulpit rock 

message: Would it be appropriate to rename this article to "Pulpit Rock"? Google Ngram Viewer shows significantly higher usage for Pulpit Rock than Preikestolen. SuneEnough (talk) 20:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to "Pulpit Rock"