Talk:Mamata Banerjee

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Why are you re adding the controversy related information on Mamata Banerjee  diff diff  While removing  similar kind of content on Dilip Ghosh (politician)   diff  . Your edit reeks of political bias, to me. Care to explain why this double standards for the 2 leaders of rival political parties?  User:ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା has removed them So please do not add them again. Discuss your edit and content on the talk page first without WP:EDIT WARRING. --Walrus Ji (talk) 15:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Because those are not regular speeches but scams and mismanagements of her government. --  Manasbose (talk | edits) 15:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Manasbose, your sneaky attempt to restore the disputed content has been reverted. The controversial content is sourced from poor sources and has already been disputed here. Please stop your edit war. --Walrus Ji (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: content detailing controversial aspects of her governance were longstanding, no rationale or discussion offered for removal of cited content, no consensus exists for the deletion of referenced content deemed fit for inclusion here. Acousmana (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a separate page for her Government. This is her biography. Understand the difference first. Walrus Ji (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a sufficient rationale. She is the party leader, this activity took place on her watch, it is her responsibility, and reported as such in the relevant sources provided, uncontroversial to detail this material - such as we do for many political leader BLPs. Acousmana (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About recently added controversial content 

message: Should we keep content relating to controversial aspects of Banerjee's governance in the article?  Acousmana (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Controversy surrounding aspects of Banerjee's governance appear to be well documented per this section. Banerjee is the founder and leader of the All India Trinamool Congress - and current chief minister of West Bengal, she is the principal authority, it is quite literally her party, WP:RS references seem to reflect this, but should we use them here? Acousmana (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed, please review. Acousmana (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you read up on RFC's and how to properly format one. This RFC isn't neutrally worded, it leads to the outcome you want. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with 's assessment that this RfC is not worded neutrally. Walrus Ji (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed, please review. Acousmana (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

text: OK, done. Acousmana (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical commentary removed 

message: I accepted a pending edit that was a revert with the edit summary "unexplained content addition". Adding sourced content doesn't usually require an explanation; however, the first several references that I checked failed to support the content, so I accepted the pending edit. Editors more familiar with the article topic are welcome to review the content and sources that were removed and determine whether any of it should be returned to the article. (The content was initially added just before an admin protected the article.) Schazjmd (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  Please look into this matter urgently. IP Address User:81.250.246.39 added vast information in the "Political Views" section, much of the sources failed verifications. It seems like a promotion / advertisement of the person. I tried to revert but User:ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା again reverted it. Please immediately look into this matter. Most of the sources failed to verify regarding the content. Thanks--Adinew56 (talk) 04:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   why did you revert my edit. Read the comment of the earlier editor regarding this issue.--Adinew56 (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Yes sorry, I should've looked closer at the talk page. My mistake. βӪᑸᙥӴ • Talk • Contribs 18:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "unexplained content addition" 

message: I made a similar statement in my contribution, but the results in Nandigram are going to a recount.  Therefore, out of an abundance of caution, I'd delete everything relating to that until we known for sure that the race has been won. jonaththejonath (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like Adhikari has won.  I'd wait until tomorrow to edit though. Jonaththejonath (talk) 13:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent results 

message: Pro-s: mid-day meal
Con-s: unemployment, TET, SSC, drop in quality education. 
Thanks. 2409:4060:2010:A453:0:0:5EB:F8AD (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  please add mid-day meal, unemployment and other issues 

message: It is deeply odd that there is no DOB here for this person. Why? Is it secret? In which case that should be referred to surely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.10.242.9 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, if you now the DOB you can add it or at least make a semi-protected edit request.  There's no rule against that. Jonaththejonath (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

text: But a reliable source is needed. Johnuniq (talk) 02:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article not include a date of birth? 

message: Please add more content in Second term section. Major events in the state during that time can also be covered there. Peter Ormond (talk) 06:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second term 

message: Please add the following report on the May 2021 election in West Bengal.  It is taken from BBC.com. Link given below.
With almost all the results counted, the Trinamool Congress party (TMC) led by the state's Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has won more than 200 seats in the 294-seat assembly.
However, she lost her own seat in the election.  "Victory was soured by the loss of her seat in Nandigram to a former aide turned BJP defector. She has said she will challenge the result in court but may have to run again to remain chief minister".
The results are set to make Ms Banerjee the leader of West Bengal for a third time. She is also India's only female chief minister.
Source : https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56964703
Accessed May 3, 2021
Change requested by SGPen.  Thank you. SGPen (talk) 11:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: while that seems like a perfectly good article to use, the text you placed there is taken straight from it. If you meant for it to be copied directly as is, that would be a copyright violation. If you meant that something else should be written about it, can you suggest some text, and where it should go? It's not clear what changes you want to be made. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 18:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2021 

message: she won the election with a increases majority gaining from congress/ left. 2600:1700:78E0:B2A0:31F2:6197:B48:691E (talk) 23:28, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ritenerek⋆:) 15:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2021 (2) 

message: Succeeded president rule is untrueKillemol (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done restored to stable version. user warned Run n Fly (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2021 

message: Change the age of mamata banerjee to 67 years 2409:4071:248A:6DDF:0:0:6FB:8B0 (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: It will automatically update.  Cannolis (talk) 04:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2022 

message: Mamata is also popular for her works in Bengali literature, her poems are published and she has written over 113 books. For this contribution,she has been given Bengal Sahitya akademi award.
She is also a self taught painter. Her paintings are auctioned several times.
She also is a lyricist and composes lyrics for songs. Her songs are usually based on 'Durga Puja' and 'Motherland'. Her song 'Ma Go Tumi Sarbojonin' sang by Shreya Ghoshal is one of her most famous song. Ku423winz1 (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature and other works 

message: There is strong allegations against her government regarding selling government job of teacher and non teaching stuff in exchange of money since 2014. Number of ministers, party officials and administrators is under custody for executiong this ratchet. Siddhertha Adhikary 1993 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Siddhertha Adhikary 1993: If you would like an edit to be made to this article, please provide the text which you want to be added, and a reference to support your claims. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 20:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teacher recruitment scam 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  16:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: In the realm of Indian politics, controversies arise on a daily basis. It's unnecessary to include every single daily controversy or news item unless the individual in question has been convicted by the Indian Judiciary or has served a considerable amount of time in jail. Also, Having a separate controversies section in articles isn't ideal. Instead, the pertinent issues should be addressed within the relevant sections of the individual's career articles, rather than consolidating them into a section that may incite negativity. Criticism and controversies section will be trimmed heavily in due time. Do no revert or engage in edit wars. I would request editors to discuss here on talk page before adding them. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 12:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism and controversies