lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:QF 4.5-inch Mk I – V naval gun

message: So far I have found reference to the 5"/55 (11.4 cm) Mark 8 gun first used on HMS Bristol int he 70's that succeeded the 4.5"/45 (11.4 cm) QF Mark V which started service in 1945. GraemeLeggett 15:46, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And they followed the 4.5"/45 (11.4 cm) QF Marks I, III and IV from the 1930s GraemeLeggett 15:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: This article could use one. The applicable infobox is , as seen here: 5"/38 caliber gun. -MBK004 04:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox? 

message: The picture at the top apparently from Dùn et le Loch Hiort, Saint-Kilda, looks like a QF 12 pounder 12 cwt or something very like it to me. Rcbutcher (talk) 04:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture at top at St Kilda ??

message: I'd guess that a direct action fuze (eg No 118?) was available to RN in WW2 in addition to time fuze(s) for AA.  Was the same shell and propelling charge used throughout the service life of the gun?  I'd also guess that after WW2 new fuzes were introduced not least a UK proximity fuze, if a US VT fuze became available in 1944 presumably it was T98 or perhaps T100.Nfe (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ammunition

message: huh ? 4766 ? Rcbutcher (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: corrected to 474 for army. Rcbutcher (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 4766 guns were built for the army, all in 1939-41

message: Unfortunately while I have a ref for the thing existing it doesn't explicitly state the current location:
https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-52820
©Geni (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: One on an land service mount survives at fort nelson
Talk:Valenciennes

message: Is it true that the city was devastated by the French in 1940, and not by the German enemy?Royalcourtier (talk) 23:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destruction in 1940 
Talk:Leon

message: An IP address added this to the page.  I've removed it until (at the very least) a surname is provided - a forename is in no way enough.  There's also the question of whether he'd be notable enough for inclusion - but that can only be answered once proper identification is in place.  Cheers. — Estarriol talk 09:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Leon, a footballer that playes for Collingwood

message: Why this article dont redireccts to León,Mexico León, Spain or León,Nicaragua? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gardan (talk • contribs) 16:18, 18 July 2006 
:It doesn't redirect because it could refer to any of the three you mention, as well as to the any of others listed on the page. older ≠ wiser 16:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities? 

message: Does anyone have a reference for this person?  I find it suspicious that a "well known gay rights activist" doesn't get a single Google hit apart from this page.  Rojomoke (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leon Neville Voorhees
Talk:The Secret of My Success (1987 film)

message: I moved the page to The Secret of My Success since this image from amazon.com suggests that is the proper name of the film.  Perhaps I am wrong?--ShaunMacPherson 11:41, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: According to IMDB, The Secret of My Succe$s is the "official" name, so I moved it back. Raider Duck 21:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Generally IMDb is a good source, but it has been known to make mistakes.  If the actual movie poster spells it "Success", why should we accept IMDb on this? —MJBurrage • TALK • 11:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Normally I would accept the film poster, not IMDB in this case. But there also is a variety review. . That one does spells it as succe$s. But it's weird that no film poster I saw spells it as that. Garion96 (talk) 11:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

text: We don't do goofy characters in titles like that. See MOS:TM. I have moved. Mike R (talk) 23:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: $

message: "She promptly replaces him with Brantley, with Jean and Melrose at his side."  Who the heck are Jean and Melrose?  This is the only mention of them in the synopsis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.186.162.89 (talk) 20:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random people
Talk:Lee Jung-hyun

message: I changed the title of the movie. "petal" in Korean is pronounced "kochip" and the romanization is "kkochip" (Revised romanization).
How do you edit the Table of Contents?  A Japanese Discography section needs to be added.
*Yahoo's Korean dictionary gives the pronunciation as 꼰닙. . The table of contents is generated automatically from section headings. Kappa 09:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kkonnip / Kkochip

message: The page is simply full of random facts about her.  Can someone make it into an encyclopedia entry, with paragraphs and a history and etc.?  Fly to the Sky is a good example, if you need one. SKS2K6 05:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Would anyone be opposed to taking the hyphen out of the name and just making it "Lee Jung Hyun"? Album artwork and her website seem to suggest spelling without the hyphen. Daram.G (talk) 03:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking the hyphen out of Lee Jung-hyun 

message: Does anyone have an authoritative reference for Lee Jung Hyun's place of birth? There is conflicting information on the Internet, and I haven't been able to find a reliable source. Daram.G (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 
Talk:Drunken chicken

message: Is it possible to get chicken drunk before cooking him to get the "drunk chicken" flavours to the max? How much burbon should one feed chicken to do this? Half a quart or a full quart?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.37.187 (talk) 04:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Drunk Chicken?"

message: Is there any connection between Yang Guifei and "drunken empress chicken"?  If so, what is it?  Some opera?  Thanks, 136.62.254.174 (talk) 01:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  connection to [[Yang Guifei]]?
Talk:Chris Gueffroy

message: Thanks very much to those who did the translation of this page from German as I requested.  Much appreciated.  ,,,Trainspotter,,, 12:17, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is where mention of Sven Hüber was recently added, without any explanation. So you might try to contact User:Gdr-history directly to ask wy it is linked. And perhaps it should not be, if he cannot explain. The only edits from this account were in one burst, so it looks like a possible throwaway, which does not inspire confidence. - Jmabel | Talk 18:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Sven Hüber just happened to be a political officer, and later deputy company commander, of Border Regiment 33, which secured the border between Treptow and Neukölln, including the location where Chris Gueffroy was shot (during his watch). He was also a youth instructor, involved with the Freie Deutsche Junge. In other words, he was just another typical GDR puppet who managed to slither his way into hierarchy. But he has done very well since the Wende, despite his past. After failing to ban use of his name in writings about GDR border atrocities, to include the murder of Chris Gueffroy, he has risen to the rank of chairman of the main personnel council of the German Federal Police.  Sven Hüber was really a non-player, outside of repeating propaganda, indoctination, and slogans to his troops, including the four that were involved the Chris Gueffroy murder; I therefore see no need for the link on the article, but perhaps  User:Gdr-history did, so I'll leave it alone. Brewer Bob (talk) 16:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sven Hüber
Talk:Schulze method

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Condorcet method/wiki/Schulze method. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 02:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Condorcet method/wiki/Schulze method" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The 5-candidate pentagram example probably scares some people off. ;)
Maybe we could try simpler examples? 4 candidates is enough to show how Schulze differs from Minimax, without cluttering everything up with too many arrows (6 arrows total, and you can display them without intersections, vs. 10 arrows for a 5-candidate race). –Maximum Limelihood Estimator 17:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpler example
Talk:Star refinement

message: I think this is what is said on paracompact space. Charles Matthews 12:58, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some variation in the literature; we need to distinguish star refinement and barycentric refinement.  See Willard (cited at paracompact space).  —Toby Bartels (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Dvtausk (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: From paracompact space

message: Korean version of this article also describes a bunch of combinatorics. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That does not necessarily mean it needs to be included in this article.  I don't read Korean, but the combinatorics formulas in that article seem more geared to finite sets and hence of more limited interest.  The main importance of the concepts in this particular article is how they relate to various variants of paracompactness. PatrickR2 (talk) 03:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combinatorics
Talk:IBM Token ring

message: I removed the statement "in a counter-clockwise direction" in the last sentence of the first paragraph of the article; the previous sentence states travel is unidirectional, but I don't think a token-ring network knows if it's left- or right-handed. --- Ettlz, 13 Sept 2004 13:56 BST
If somebody could explain what a "star-wired logical ring" is, I think that could help this article's clarity.  Thanks! --- N8wilson, 2 May 04:15 EST (-04:00)
I have added an image showing the "star-wired logical ring".  I also removed the sentence about the star wired logical ring as it is confusing and the same concept is explained up higher with the "...  is wired as a star, with 'hubs' and arms out to each station ..." sentence. Sfisher 23:47, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
As I mentioned in Template_Talk:IPstack#Template_overuse I don't think it is appropriate to put the IPstack template on the Token Ring page.  Does anyone disagree?  Sfisher 00:46, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
RobertPhoenix (talk) 01:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the patent holder, Olof Söderblom, information and first Token-Ring installation (late 1960s in Sweden).  There is no mention in article of Proteon's Pro-Net 4 (aligned to IEEE 802.5) and Pro-Net 10 (higher speed implementation) in the early 1980s.  These were actually on the market before the IBM product offering.  I installed Pro-Net 10 at a few clients in this period -- predated later 16 Mb version of Token-Ring and matched Ehternet speeds of that period. --User:Beatgr 15:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Isn't the official name "Token-Ring"? SyP 14:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good point.  There is also another Wikipedia entry IBM token ring, that I have suggested be merged with this material.  User:Beatgr 16:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:IBM token ring. In particular, it's now proposed there to move the merged article to a name that doesn't specifically refer to the IBM implementation. Andrewa 19:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Token-Ring - correct naming?
Talk:Doppleganger (Alias episode)

message: Ah, so you do know what a compromise is.  "(sic)" is not ideal, because it still does not point out what the actual spelling of the word is, and doesn't allow people to click through to Doppelgänger, but it's better than just leaving it.  Chameleon 13:02, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kate Moss

message: Could the infobox image be changed to this one:  Reason: In the current infobox image, her sunglasses cover so much of her face that she is not really recognizable.
The change would be:
| image        = Kate Moss - Decorté advertisement.jpg
| caption      = Moss in 2019
and to remove the now-duplicate image from "Personal life". 
157.157.113.107 (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This image is under copyright. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been confirmed as released under an acceptable free license. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image 

message: The associations made in the intro with Moss and the tabloid-ese terms ‘heroin chic’ and ‘size zero’  are vague and subjective. These are associations, not facts, and do not belong in this section 2A02:C7F:9FB8:9C00:FC04:11D7:994B:CBCF (talk) 06:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They are supported by reliable sources in the body of the article and thus a summary version is in the lead per WP:LEAD EvergreenFir (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heroin chic and size zero 

message: Hello, Kate's birth name is Kate Moss, not Katherine Ann Moss as stated in the infobox. As an employee of Kate Moss Agency LTD, how can I go about changing this please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factsonfashion (talk • contribs) 13:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't unless you have a very good independent reliable published source. Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are already multiple reliable sources cited for her name, including The Guardian. You would have to get them to issue a retraction or correction, or get a reliable source to publish a copy of her birth certificate, before we could change it here. And you need to disclose your paid editing status on your user page before you do anything else on Wikipedia, including participation on this talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name 

message: In the section on Moss's charity work, "the tsunami" should probably link to the page on 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami rather than the general page on tsunamis. Can someone update that? Thanks.
--141.149.53.253 (talk) 20:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor tweak to tsunami link
Talk:Heinrich Brandt

message: Article listed on WP:VFD Sep 13 to Sep 20 2004, consensus was to keep and list on cleanup.  Discussion:
Heinrich Brandt fails to establish notability in the article. It hasn't been edited since its creation so it's not about to suddenly aquire the required context. Delete unless one of the auto-keepers finds some evidence of notability and adds it to the article. —Rory ☺ 13:05, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete: You know, I'm with Rory.  I think there probably is some notability, but I can't find it.  If I were comfortable with German, perhaps the "Good Sources" external link might tell me.  There are Wikipedians with German who might be able to clarify, so this is a provisional delete. Geogre 13:27, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD from Sep 2004
Talk:Mains electricity by country

message: According to the article, the residential voltage in India is 230 V but three phase voltage is 415 V. However 230 \times \sqrt{3} = 398 \approx 400 and not 415. The source for the 415 V value says that residential voltage is 240 V. Many Indian books and textbooks state this value to be 220 V. As far as I know, the residential voltage is 230 V and three phase voltage is 400 V following IEC 60038. I, however have no source for this value. All three values lie within the tolerance range.
Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's worthwhile bearing in mind that, these days, 230V is often used as a 'nominal' value such as throughout Europe (actually 230V +/- 10%). Although the nominal mains voltage for Europe is 230V, very few countries actually have 230V mains supplies. 220V (mostly) and 240V are often encountered both of which are well within 10%. 250V is sometimes encountered in some suburbs of large UK cities (London is a notable example) which is still within 10%. Most modern appliances are not overly fussy about their supply voltage apart from incandescent light bulbs which still exist for some applications. 86.162.147.159 (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  India 

message: "Confirmed by looking at Aqualectric meter" is something like original research? Not a major editor so I'm not gonna actually go in and correct it, but like. Ellenor2000 (talk) 14:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source #26 

message: Please help me with...
Hello!
I came across the data in Wikipedia, today, for which I believe is wrong. It's about electricity in Slovenia.
There is a table that says it is 230V, but in fact it is 220v. It's here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_electricity_by_country
I don't know how to edit it, so I decided to just write here. Couldn't find any other possibility.
Thanks in advance for correcting that data.
Best regards,
Alja Žehelj (from Slovenia) 89.233.115.214 (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help me! 

message: In the table section for Belgium, the three-phase table cell says 230/400 V. Although I can not verify, doesn't Belgium have similar systems like norway having both 230 V (three-phase without neutral) and 400 V (230 V/400 V star with neutral)? Although I don't think belgium commonly uses the IT grid, unlike norway. Now for japan, where is the source for the 415 V three-phase (either delta, or 240 V/415 V star) that is supposedly in use in Japan?
I'm new to the talk section, so I will do my best to follow guidelines on discussion boards. Additionally, I rarely edit wikipedia articles so I am not going to make edits yet. TheDIsco00010 (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three-phase voltage for Belgium and Japan
Talk:Green Party of Hawaii

message: I think we forgot about Keiko Bonk.  :)  --Gerald Farinas 14:39, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Forgot
Talk:Blalock–Thomas–Taussig shunt

message: Hallo Charles, thank you for your help. I'm german and much better in reading than in writing. Interested in congenital heart diseasesErs 15:04, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved - no evidence has been provided that the proposed name is the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Blalock–Taussig shunt →  – This surgical method has been renamed the "Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt" in order to give credit to Vivien Thomas, a key inventor of the method who was not previously given credit. This change has been reflected in the article itself but not the title of the article. Mch232823 (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). wbm1058 (talk) 16:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 May 2021
Talk:List of butterflies of Great Britain

message: Hi, I'm AshLin, 
(Self-appointed steward of List of Butterflies of India (Papilionidae). )
We've recently made a change to our list. Earlier, We used to have only the Common Name and Scientific name listed for each species, just like your list has, as of now. Based on feedback, we have now added the author and date next to the scientific names. This has made things easier for our list users who then don't have to refer to the species page for this basic info. Check it out! Yeah, it is a little cluttery, but useful. Secondly, we intend that our newbies get used to the idea of authors, taxonomy, precedence etc.
Of course, the hallowed tradition of British aureliana probably takes it for granted that,  'if you don't know this butterfly was described by O. Bang-Haas in Trans Lep Journal of Outer Mongolia in 1914, you have no right to be here, Sir!' . ;-). Sorry, could'nt resist pulling the proper British leg. :)
Our list is relatively new and only three guys, User:Shyamal, User:VirenVaz and User:AshLin are the small crew. We've begun the Paps first to showcase our intentions. See Graphium nomius as a maiden effort. Once we've done the Paps to perfection, we'll have an orgy with the remaining thousand odd species of other families. Yumm! A lifetime's work in the tradition of Indian butterflying. Do visit our site and give us comments.
All the best, yours cheekily,
AshLin 05:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A suggestion from a brother List steward

message: Some of the butterflies listed here are stubs. with just one line! Another like Nymphalis io , (Camberwell Beauty) does not mention extinction over part of its range. Cant decide whether the tag extinct butterflis should be put on any of these species. Request some interested person to fill in these gaps also. AshLin 02:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extinct Butterflies

message: Does Great Britain have an official butterfly, or an endemic butterfly which has recognition as a representative? If so, it needs to be mentioned in the lead and its image should replace the dreary one of Papilio machaon.
Regards, AshLin 06:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official butterfly?

message: The picture next to the lead is of a swallowtail butterfly. Checking on the information provided with this image it seems not to be the British subspecies Papilio machaon brittanicus. There is at least one picture of this subspecies on Wikimedia  and I suggest it either replaces this picture or that another butterfly picture is used and this brittanicus picture is placed next to its entry below (at present it cannot since it would be inappropriate to have two pictures of the same butterfly on this page given lack of space).--LittleHow (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that! I've replaced the image. Jack (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead picture is not British butterfly
Talk:Non-Aristotelian logic

message: Once, now many years ago, I was a member of the Institute of General Semantics, and I would not equate Non-Aristotlean logic with GS, but would instead argue that GS falls into the set of Non-Aristotelean ways of thought.  As I understand it, Null-A logic simply refers to those logic systems that avoid strict subject-predicativism - and allow for more complex relationships.  -Fish-man 18:09, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I could maybe see merging this article with multi-valued logic or some other term. But I don't see why you'd consider the current name "blatantly false". Aristotle gave the world a formal system of logic that ruled out multiple truth values. (See Aristotelian logic.) He also says, at one place in his copious writings, that not all his logical laws apply to statement about the future. As far as we know, he did not pursue this further. Dan 23:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Null-A or Non-Arstotelian... 

message: Proponents of General Semantics take as meaning any non-classical system of logic which uses three or more truth values. They argue that this renders relatively 'subjective' conclusions from inductive logic, rather than relying strictly on the binary, deductive reasoning widely accepted as yielding more 'objective' results and capable of providing 'scientific proof'.
My first reaction to that last sentence was unprintable. I gather that Ombudsman wrote it and someone then attributed it to "proponents of General Semantics". Don't do that. Even without the ambiguity in the current phrasing (which could mean that the adoption of null-A logics makes the field of inductive logic seem subjective), the sentence seems misleading at best. Who on Earth claims that induction can't provide scientific proof? Certainly not Korzybski! Dan 23:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening Paragraph