Talk:Characters of The Keys to the Kingdom series

message: This article really should be merged with Characters of the Keys to the Kingdom series.
:Seconded 213.122.106.93 11:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. If Arthur Penhaligon has his own page, why should Suzy TB, the other main character, not have her own as well? From Suzy's page, it is clear that there is quite a lot to say about her. Surely this could not all be condensed into a small enough space to fit into this list of characters? And if we must Suzy on this page, should Arthur go on too? Ian F. 19:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Suzy Blue]] 

message: *I would like to point out that the Will is known as Dame Primus regardless of what part it is. I did change this so if anyone has any objections speak now.--sonoftheclayr 02:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Will 

message: The Architect should be in the cast of characters of this great series.  I think there's a Masonic link/reference in the character, as Masonry refers to a Universal Architect.
I think the Architect article should be merged into this one as it doesn't really have enough information to be an article of it's own. It makes more sense for it to be on this page. Tartan 17:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Architect 

message: I would prefer the main article on Arthur to remain seperate, as it allows more detail to be given on him.  There's more than enough information about him, unlike the architect, and I'd like to see him have his own page.--ÑøζζłεΜαń 18:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arthur Penhaligon

message: There is no way the Old One should have his own article. It should be merged into this one. 213.122.106.93 11:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Old One 

message: I am going through the article and removing any unsource speculation. --kralahome 04:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: I removed this claim several times from the article, because I feel it is orignal research, it is merely someones theory and does not belong in Wikipedia.
"A possible explanation is that the Children, combining a Denizen's lifespan and human ability to adapt and learn, might gain power and knowledge enough to outstrip the Denizens someday if their memories weren't periodically erased. Dame Primus' comment in "Drowned Wednesday" that the Raised Rats are dangerous because their resistance to washing between the ears allows them to gather dangerous amounts of knowledge could support this theory. Another possibility is that washing between the ears is a humane enterprise to prevent the Children from suffering mental disorders due to experiencing a lifespan that the human mind isn't ready for."
Please someone tell me if I am out of line. --kralahome 01:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because Wikipedia very specificly does not like speculation. If you can get a reputable source, such as a book review or magazine, speculating this, then it will be allowable. But while there is not source, there is no paragraph. --kralahome 22:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orginal Research 

message: Many people have been adding Lust as Lady Friday's sin. Could we please not do that, as there has been no confirmation of that by the author. It is merely speculation, based on the end of the latest book where it is said she is beautiful. This does not make her lustful, it could just as easily be pride/vanity. So please stop putting that up there as it is unconfirmed. Thank you. --kralahome 01:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could also say that Lord Sunday's is lust or greed because he was always seeking out the most power, that Superior Saturday's is pride because he does the most meddling in the house and that makes him think too highly of himself. Do you see how this is a trap that is so easy to fall into? --kralahome 21:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I already covered your info in my last edit. Bio 18:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Friday's Sin 

message: When I read Grim tuesday I thought it was obvious that Japeth and Mathias were to become the new Dusk and Noon and both of them atteding the meeting at the beginning of Sir Thursday seemed to confirm that in my mind.--SurrealWarrior 22:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuesday's Times 

message: Where did this info on there being 12 attendants come from? I do not remember this info in any of the books thus far. Bio 20:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bathroom Attendants