lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Affair of the Poisons

message: this article is a fairly good summary of the events but I see that it was written in an older wiki-style before we did in-line citations for facts.  I do happen to have a copy of the  Somerset books so I can try and provide inline cites with page numbers for some of the asserted facts but not all.  I'd also like to see a couple of images of the major players included.  Can anyone help me out?LiPollis (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good summary of events but needs conversion to inline cites

message: I don't think the following is correct: "six women were imprisoned at Château de Villefranche". According to <http://www.fort-liberia.com/fort-liberia/page_4.html> eight women were imprisoned at the Fort Libéria in Villefranche-de-Conflent. Actually, I visited this place and saw the prison. The Château de Villefranche is located somewhere else, namely in the commune of Villeneuve-lès-Bouloc in the Haute-Garonne département of France (see the Wikipedia entry for it).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Microbizz (talk • contribs) 11:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not imprisoned at the Château de Villefranche 

message: The reference to "Sex With Kings" was introduced in this diff, by Kazuba. It was recently revised by Moonraker to read "in her book Sex with Kings, records that Given claimed the remains..." instead of "in her book Sex with Kings, records "Given" claimed the remains...". This makes no sense. "Given" is obviously not a name. I checked the book, and it seems that the passage Kazuba refers to reads: "Given reports of babies' bones in La Voisin's garden, the police started digging. They uncovered the remains of twenty-five hundred infants (...)". It made little sense as written originally, but the quote-removing edit by Moonraker really made this less obvious and more confusing, given that "Given", without quotes and capitalized looks like a name, which isn't mentioned anywhere, because it isn't a name. How about checking that stuff makes sense before editing? --Lasse Hillerøe Petersen (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleanor Herman reference 

message: This is listed as among the prisons where the various accused were incarcerated.  However, Google does not know the word "Salces" as a place name - I believe the correct article may be Fort de Salses, but (presumably) this isn't what the reference says.  Is there another reference that can confirm the correct location? Tevildo (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Château de Salces?
Talk:Revolutions of 1830

message: I do agree. The 1830 revolutions in Europe is almost as importaint as the 1848. The peace that followed the Vienna treaties 1814 and again 1815 (after Napoleon's 100 days of return). It was after the revolutiotions this year that the idea of people and nations began. In 1848 it spread even wider. But this subject cannot be taken lightly, I think. Boeing720 (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importaint Revolutionary Year 

message: There was nothing about Italy so I added slightly shortened section of article on Italian unification. --Alekol (talk) 15:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy 

message: The Texas Revolution was separated by several years from these events Rousillon (talk) 21:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the Texas Revolution really part of this wave?
Talk:Great Oil Sniffer Hoax

message: What happened to Bonassoli after the affair, and where is he now? The last we hear of him in this article is his brief reappearance in 1984. Beorhtwulf (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonassoli 

message: Upon reading this article, I can't say I have any idea what the Great Oil Sniffer Hoax was.  Most of the text in this article assumes the reader already has some background knowledge on the topic.  --50.4.162.0 (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Great Oil Sniffer Hoax was a 1979 scandal involving French oil company Elf Aquitaine. The company spent millions of dollars to develop a new gravity wave-based oil detection system, which was later revealed to be a scam.." Seems pretty clear to me. 184.94.55.126 (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks clarity
Talk:Administrative divisions of the Republic of Artsakh

message: User:Archives908, Kashatagh Province does not exist now neither de facto nor de jure. Administrative divisions of the Republic of Artsakh post-2020 is shown here.
Horizontal regions striped black are regions claimed as an integral part of Republic of Artsakh controlled by Azerbaijan. --Somerby (talk) 13:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest that it be called "While the province is formally controlled by Azerbaijan and Russian peace keepers, it is still claimed by Artsakh as an integral part of the republic." Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

text: As far as I'm aware, that map and all similar ones have been made without sources by Wikipedian guesswork. CMD (talk) 14:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  CMD, but is there any source which said that Kashatagh Province still exists? --Somerby (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There are sources noting its existence. For that it was presumably created in some Artsakh statute, and unless that statute has been repealed or superseded I assume it is still on the books. If nothing else the 2006 constitution remains in force. CMD (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  CMD, if I recall correctly, in 2006 constitution was written that the public power is exercised on the territory actually under the jurisdiction of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. And not a single law of Artsakh explicitly mentions the Kashatagh Province. --Somerby (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was, and in 2006 there was a lot of that. To go back to the initial point, we don't have a source for the purported new maps. They are original research, and more original research here won't change that. CMD (talk) 04:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kashatagh Province]]
Talk:List of counts of Mortain

message: What are the reasons for the periods when there was no count?
The sheer number of counts -- the property shifting hands in several cases before the death of the count -- the county was a "white elephant" of some sort?
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 03:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vacant positions

message: According to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry on Hubert de Burgh, 1st Earl of Kent, he was made Count of Mortain by John I of England, presumably around the time John became king. I think he would therefore belong on this list, and the entry for John should probably be changed, since the title wouldn't have been lost to France until 1204, when much of John's possessions in France were lost. But if Hubert were added, should he be listed under English counts, in which case he would be the lone entry before the 1400s? Or would it be tidier to place him right after John under Norman counts? The problem with that may be that he wasn't actually Norman. Jbening (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've finally added him to the list, and I see that de Burgh was in fact an Anglo-Norman name, so he does belong among the Norman counts. Jbening (talk) 02:55, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored it.  Anglo-Normans were still Norman, so no reason to leave him out. Agricolae (talk) 15:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Agrciolae. I don't have strong feelings about this, but there's a discussion at Talk:Hubert de Burgh, 1st Earl of Kent that documents why I myself eventually backed down on the claim that he was ever Count of Mortain, Norman or not. It hinges on interpretation of wording in his biography, and on how great an achievement that County would have been relative to other titles he was given. Jbening (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out the other discussion. I agree, now, that ODNB was referring to Herbert serving John when John was Count of Mortain, so I self-reverted. Agricolae (talk) 23:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hubert de Burgh?
Talk:Jean Chastel

message: The french page on Jean Chastel gives a completely different story.. Zargulon (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy with French WP page

message: Shouldn't the theory that Chastel somehow possesed a hyena and trained it to kill women and childeren be mentioned? Maildiver (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyena Theory 

message: At one point in the article it states that he fired one shot but then goes on to use the word "bullets" (<plural) and to state that it was the "last shot" which pierced the creatures heart.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sorceress Rin (talk • contribs) 11:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences within the same paragraph
Talk:Faith Salie

message: For what it's worth, much of the text on this page seems to be lifted directly from Faith's bio page at the official Fair Game Web site  --3finger 02:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Humpy

message: Would it be possible for the article to mention the word 'gunya', either as a synonym, or if it isn't, with an explanation of the difference. The word 'gunya' is well-known in Australian English, it would be useful if the article made some reference.
Bathrobe 03:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gunya?

message: "I'll Build A Gunyah For Ya"  138.44.176.14 (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Vintage Australian song
Talk:Name of France

message: De Gaulle's name comes from "Van de Walle" a typical Flemish name. His family has its roots in the Département du Nord, which is French by conquest (Louis xiv; 1650-1700), and which is called 'French Flanders'... (they have the same flag as the current flemish region/community!--> dutch was also the second language in France!)
There is probably more going on than a simple bastardisation of this name under French linguistic influence; it is likely the "Van de Walles" changed their name fairly recently into "De Gaulle" for political and social reasons (the flemish usually being a subclass of woring folks and peasantry, and looked down upon)... as such this frenchification might be more likely a political conversion of the nineteenth century (nationalism!) that is globally fairly typical... (for instance the anglification of names of immigrants into the US, to avoid being the subject of racism and discrimination)
therefore it should be investigated when (and also why!) the "Van de Walles" changed -if deliberately- their familyname...
Monoclemask (talk) 09:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Declaration of the Clergy of France

message: I removed and replaced the content attributed from  because the removed content is not in this cited source or about this subject. The removed content is about the more general liberties and not about the four articles. It looks like  added unattributed content and  added the reference in good faith. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 00:35, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New catholic dictionary
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Cambrai

message: The section on "Pilgrimages" actually contains two lists;  the second is a list of religious orders that do business in the diocese.  Neither is properly referenced.  They derive from a POV source, the Catholic Encyclopedia, which is a century old or more, and which does not represent the current situation in the diocese.  This section must be revised or deleted. --Vicedomino (talk) 14:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilgrimages 

message: The section on "Abbeys" appears to be more than 215 years out-of-date. It is unreferenced. It should be updated, rewritten, and referenced, or removed.  --Vicedomino (talk) 15:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbeys 

message: This diocese appears to be solely in France. Why is it included in the categories for Belgium & the Netherlands as well? I plan on removing those categories in a few days if no one provides sufficient answer. Thank you! Referencer12 (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories?
Talk:La Trémoille family

message: Is it not La Trémoïlle, that is, with the diaeresis? Seven Letters 22:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From our French colleagues: La Maison de La Trémoille (écrit également La Trémoïlle, écrit et prononcé La Trémouille ou encore Trimouille) est une famille ducale française … —Tamfang (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Even if there are people named La Trémoille alive today, the House of La Trémoille is extinct, as kown per various references. 217.167.255.177 (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of section
Talk:U.S. Route 13 in Maryland

message: Anybody have any pictures of the welcome center near the Virginia Border they can upload? I was there last year, and I'm kind of sorry that I never did. ----DanTD (talk) 00:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome Center pictures? 

message: The article phrases it "by 1975", and cites an Exxon map of that vintage.  However, looking at the 1968 USGS topo (which was based on 1967 aerial photos), it can be narrowed down to "by 1967". Niobrara (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Pocomoke City bypass
Talk:Count of Vermandois

message: Isn't the Bernard mentioned the wrong one ? It should be Bernard_of_Italy. --Japarthur (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: What in the world is a "beneficiary count?" Is it a Sendgraf? CsikosLo (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beneficiary count
Talk:Gowanus, Brooklyn

message: While the Gowanus neighborhood in Brooklyn has in the past been known for it's industrial activity, in recent years with Manhattan becoming ever more expensive, the area has become more appealing for residential development.  Many condos have been built and industrial loft and garment buildings rezoned to become living spaces for affluent-hipster types. The area remains affordable due to it's history.  Also, the near by canal is where the Sopranos would dump bodies.  It is a colorful neighborhood, and its close proximity to parks and the waterfront, as well as accessibility to freeway access and available street parking make it a charming and convenient place to reside.
What's the ethnic makeup of the neighborhood these days?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.147.115.53 (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:I'll Tell Me Ma

message: I recommend that, rather than moving the article, the text of the song be moved to WikiSource, and this page link to that.
-- TimNelson 04:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer to have the lyrics in the article itself. One reason for this is the shortness of the lyrics. Another reason is that it makes the article richer, like a picture to help describe a subject. Spelemann 21:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiSource 

message: Versions of this song were collected in the 19th century in England, and published in Alice B. Gomme's Traditional Games of England, Scotland and Ireland in 1894 ("The Wind", versions from Gloucestershire, Shropshire, Isle of Wight, Yorkshire, etc.), so it couldn't have been written by Francie McPeake (born 1885).  Other versions collected are:
Grainger Collection 1906, Miscellanea of Rymour Club 1906-11,
Grieg-Duncan 1907,
Cecil Sharp 1908,
Gillington (Isle of Wight) 1909,
Gatty Ms (Yorks) 1909,
Piper, JAFL (American, Illinois) 1915
This needs to be corrected. Hohenloh (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of this song 

message: Conor Makem, Tommy Makem's son, told me that his father added the verse "Let the wind and the rain and the hail...." It is now part of the standard Irish folksong version as normally performed. I have been unable to find a citation for this but the lyric certainly sounds like Makem's sense of humor ("she won't tell her ma when she goes home") and I presume Conor's to be an accurate statement (Tommy was in the room at the time). I leave this comment here for anybody who is interested.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.65.89 (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wind and the rain" verse 

message: Surely this line (7th in 2nd verse) is wrong, it should be a girl's name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahardy66 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Johnny Murphy says she'll die
Talk:Interstate 90 in Wisconsin

message: The mileage in the Wiki story notes 187.14 miles in WIS but the USDOT reference only shows 108.61 miles of I-90 in WIS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.130.35.41 (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that Google Maps says that it is 187 miles from state line to state line on I-90 in Wisconsin, the FHWA source would be wrong. Imzadi 1979 →  03:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

text: Also, if you look at the FHWA source, it doesn't indicate the overlap with I-39. If you look at the mileage for the I-39 junction near Portage, that's MP 108.59 according to WisDOT. I think there's the source of your discrepancy. FHWA just forgot to add in the overlapping mileage with I-39 and note the overlap on the log. Imzadi 1979 →  03:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mileage does not match reference 

message: is it just me, or is the "east-west" orientation in mentioned in the description of this article a little misleading? Cause some of it is east-west oriented, a large part of it is northwest-southeast oriented and the other portion north-south oriented. Should this be fixed? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 18:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction
Talk:Government of National Defense

message: The Parisians in the National Guard actually performed decently in the last attempt at a breakout, considering they were never trained properly and armed with obsolete muskets.  Either way, the best troops in France would have had a very tough time succeeding in that task. When I get a break from work I will try to make a page just about that last battle before hopes of a breakout completely vanished.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.15.7 (talk) 04:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: These elections were held in the German occupied territories too. Otherwise there were no members elected in Upper Rhine and Lower Rhine Départements and the whole Northeastern France. But, as Mr Thiers said in front of the new-elected assembly in Bordeaux on March, 10th: "No country had been ever asked in a more sincere way and it has never given a more sincere answer than on that occassion. Partly the territory has been occupied but the enemy didn't take a hand into that election. Some préfets (head of département's administration) would have likely done so but they hadn't time enough for this. So it [the elections] has gone without interference due to strangers' lack of interest and administration's lack of time."
I found these sentences (translated into German) in Wilhelm Oncken: Das Zeitalter des Kaisers Wilhelm. (Einzelausgabe: ) in: Oncken, W. (Hg.): Allgemeine Geschichte in Einzeldarstellungen, Vierte Hauptabteilung, Sechster Teil, 2. Band, Berlin: Grote, 1890 und öfter, S. 341.
best regards --176.0.108.84 (talk) 11:49, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections of February, 8th, 1871
Talk:Cross (disambiguation)

message: This reordering was claimed to be required by to WP:MOSDAB.
The ordering specified there is according to "In most cases, place the items in order of usage, with the most-used meanings appearing at the top and less common meanings below."
I believe the prior ordering reflected the most-used meanings appearing at the top and the less common meanings below. patsw 02:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, I waited a week for a discussion to develop.  It didn't.  I have restored the ordering of the article to have the most-used meanings appear at the top. patsw 00:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reordering of December 12, 2006
Talk:Compagnie de l'Occident

message: I guess this article is a repeat of French West India Company. I guess Compagnie des Indes occidentales and Compagnie de l'Occident are one and the same. If yes we can merge the articles.--Victor D PARLE 18:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: French West India Company and the so called Compagnie de l'Occident are the same : this article has to be replaced by Crozat's 1718 Company. Yours, -- Spiessens 13:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Repeat article
Talk:Gritstone Trail

message: The 1800m figure is on the Gritstone Grind website FAQ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GingerBeast  (talk • contribs) 11:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'll check it out and add a citation. Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ascent
File talk:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006 edit3.jpg

message: Nice picture. I like how the girl in the centre appears to be perfectly posed near the water. It would be nice to know what the building is in the back left! Could you place a google map link by any chance? --CyclePat 02:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that's Bath Abbey. howcheng  {chat} 03:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Susan Griffin

message: Compared to other articles on living persons this one looks skimpy: just a short summary para. and then list of her books and ext links----Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think your article is really good and I was really impressed with the amount of information you found and how well everything is organized!
Lead Section: You did a great job of including an introductory sentence that summarizes the article and orients readers to what the article will be about. 
Organization: I think the organization is great and the subtitles you have make everything very clear and easy to read. 
Citations: You did a great job with your citations and I didn't find anything to change!
Great job!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanamoody (talk • contribs) 22:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tana's Peer Review for Caroline 

message: The introductory sentence does state the topic of the article concisely and accurately in a single sentence. There is no issues knowing what the article is about.
The lead section does break the article into the different sections and summarizes the major points of the. I don't see anything missing.
There are efficient headings and subheadings that allow reading the article to be easier. The reader will know what each section is about and can easily go to that specific section based on subheadings and organization.
Adding information about her work and her part in ecofeminism is really good. It seems as though you found some really good information on her and are still trying to get more detail about certain aspects of her life that are not exactly easy to find.
Adding small information about her life is relevant to the article. There does not seem to be a lot of information on her life in general.
I think more information of the summary portion of the article the life section would make the article seem a bit more balanced. There seems to be a lot of information on her awards and a bit more on her work, so editing those sections would make the article seem a bit more balanced.
I think the article sounds more like that of an encyclopedia and not like an argument. There does not seem to be a lot of opinions, just facts about the person's life.
Not every single statement is associated with a reference, but majority of the sentences do have a reference. The sentence after her anti-pornography novel does not have a reference.
The sources are the best ones for the topic and seem to  be appropriate for the genre.
The references do include completely filled out citation templates.
ShakeithaG (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shakeitha's Peer Review