Talk:The Magnetic Fields

message: :Image:The magnetic fields holiday album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:The magnetic fields holiday album cover.jpg

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed.  Please do not restore them.  -- Merope 18:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use - Discography 

message: The word twee doesn't appear anywhere on this page.  Can that be right? -- Zarvok | Talk 03:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  He's clearly being a smartarse. Tell him to shove it up his arse. Magnetic Fields rock!!60.240.153.58 (talk) 17:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  twee 

message: "comment: Magnetophone isn't a Galaxie 500 spin-off, aside from being founded seven years later in 1998. Did the author mean Damon & Naomi?" --AW (talk) 04:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question from article 

message: Is this at all accurate?  This is more accurate of SOME albums under the MF moniker, but applies mostly to albums Merritt has released under the name Future Bible Heroes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.78.12 (talk) 04:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Characterization of music as 1980s synth pop in opening paragraph

message: I did an interview with Claudia Gonson of this group, so I feel it deserves to be a part of this page. Then WHY, when other band interviews are included on this page in the link AREA, why cannot MINE?  Kingtommy2020 (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Trying to get links to your own site into Wikipedia is a conflict of interest, and discouraged. If it's important, someone else will add it. --McGeddon (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: :Does anyone have any more information about the Buffalo Rome project? More importantly, I know the LD Beghtol book mentions Buffalo Rome, but does it mention he played all the instruments? I don't recall that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dotbrodu (talk) 03:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: At the lack of any interest whatsoever, I have removed that information. Please contact me before adding it again without verifiable sources. Dotbrodu (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffalo Rome? 

message: Indie pop is accurate as an overarching genre for their whole body of work and synth pop constitutes a large portion of their discography (most everything pre-69 love songs). Noise pop, on the other hand, is only really present on one album (Distortion) and I'm not exactly sure where indie folk fits in, at all. I'm going to make the appropriate edits in the infobox. Mbza (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 

message: The history section jumps from 1991 to 1999, jumping over the first 5 releases and pretending that that 6th, 7th, and 8th release were initially released as one. It needs serious fleshing out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:980:29C8:FC5C:ED97:39C2:293E (talk) 00:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  An actual band history?