lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Erie/Assessment

message: maybe it should be members only rating, to prevent rate vandalism. Id help you start the rating system, but I really dont know much about it. -Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy 00:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are doing just fine with assessing articles.  Just watch it when you assess articles as GA or above because those articles go through an evaluation before they recieve that status (unless another Wikiproject has already even it an GA or above status, then its probably okay to do that). Dtbohrer 01:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well I saw it say it was FA nominated, so I thought it would be an GA article. I will use better discretion from now on. Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy 01:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: my opinion
Talk:Iran–Iraq border

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 00:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: The Today section has nothing in it. Is there a reason for such?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadisonGrundtvig (talk • contribs) 18:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today Section
Talk:Šuto Orizari Municipality

message: It does not appear to be the only municipality with a Roma majority in the world - see for example http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant_loc.jsp?regiune_id=875&judet_id=1059&localitate_id=1069, http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant_loc.jsp?regiune_id=503&judet_id=810&localitate_id=856, http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant_loc.jsp?regiune_id=2568&judet_id=2646&localitate_id=2694 and http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant_loc.jsp?regiune_id=875&judet_id=976&localitate_id=997, all in Romania. It probably is the largest, though.213.47.123.225 00:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roma majority

message: It is said "Šuto Orizari is the only local administrative unit in the world to have adopted Romani as an official language." Some municipalities in Kosovo, such as Prizren, have Romani as an official language among others. Is there a difference in status? Is the sentence now outdated? Was Shutka the first municipality to adopt Romani as official language?
Flaje Flyo (talk) 08:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Romani language elsewhere
Talk:Monster Man (film)

message: Good Christ.  Someone rewrite this, or delete the article completely.  I suspect the latter would be best. 68.20.179.58 04:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How was he created 50.106.178.83 (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monster man
Talk:Melanmarainadu

message: ==Cleanup message==
Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 00:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Third-party grading

message: The text beginning with "Third Party Grading was created for the sole purpose..." (third paragraph) appears to be written with a strong POV biased against Third Party Grading services.  Text like "scourge", "laughs all the way to the bank", and "purposely misgraded" imply ill intent on the part of the Third Party Grading services.  These paragraphs need to be rewritten from a neutral point of view, neither biased against nor in favor of the grading services which are allegedly doing these acts.  Additionally, these claims need to be backed up with verifiable citations from a trusted and accepted source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.168.59 (talk) 06:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--R&BpopROCK (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute - Impact 

message: Under the "Impact" heading, there was a misspelling. It read "vertain," which I assumed to mean "certain."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.40.186 (talk) 05:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small edit
Category talk:Civil parishes in Kent

message: ... just look at the huge list at List of civil parishes in Kent! Where are they all? Peter Shearan (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know!  Few people understand the difference between village and civil parish, so a large proportion of the latter never get categorised to here. Peter Shearan (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: But ...
Talk:Thanet District Council

message: This is good comprehensive article, covering all the major features of a District Council. The article Thanet, on the other hand, tries to combine information originally in an article entitled Isle of Thanet (at present merged with the latter for no apparent reason), which is only part (albeit the major part) of this district, and has a much longer history. It is my intention to clear much of the information on the island from that latter article, which should then be closed, since it would then be exactly the same as this one! Peter Shearan (talk) 14:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: When a person is release from prison, why his medical records is not release to his probation office
WAYNE1944 (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TEXAS GOVERMENT ON MENTAL ILL IN PRISON
Talk:Westerham

message: I've usually heard Westerham , as two syllables – this is from people who lived there in the early part of the 20th century.  Is this general, or is it also , with three syllables?  Are there sources for either?  Richard New Forest (talk) 20:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: no mention of origin on village name from settlers from Denmark/Germany. Link to people from westrum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.159.236 (talk) 22:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not find any sources for this hypothesis, if you find some, by all means, add the information.  Andreas  (T) 20:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Westrum in Germany 
Talk:Harris Township, Fulton County, Illinois

message: At present if you type "Harris" into the wikipedia search box you are taken to the Isle of Harrises entry! As there are many uses of the word Harris it has been proposed to change this so that when you type "Harris" you are taken to the Harris (disambiguation) page instead.
If you support/oppose this move or have any comments please add your input to the Harris Talk page.
Thanks --WickerWiki (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change to Harris primary topic 
Talk:Bundesautobahn 49

message: The article needs translation and removal off red links. I think there are existing articles in en:wiki for most of the red links. Sebastian scha. (talk) 13:21, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: done Sebastian scha. (talk) 22:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention tagged 
Talk:Purposive theory

message: I think this article is doubling up on Purposive rule. I would suggest to merge these articles and cross-reference.
Should there be a merge between the articles purposive theory and purposive rule? This may be beneficial as there appears to be overlap between the content of the two articles. Also there appears to be several interchangeable terms regarding purposivism including: purposive approach, interpretation, doctrine, theory and rule. Israeli jurist Aharon Barak refers to it in his 2005 books as ‘purposive interpretation’.  While Michael Zander refers to it as ‘purposive approach’.  Should the two existing articles merge, the new article should have a title that recognizes the differing terminology, yet gives precedent to the most legitimate term. --Original Documents Canada (talk) 19:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Sheppey Crossing

message: Contradicting articles - 35m vs 20m for the height of Sheppey Crossing
Isle of Sheppey article says:
"The Sheppey crossing ... rises to a height of 20 m above The Swale"
This article says:
"The Sheppey Crossing ... crosses The Swale at a height of 35m"
One is nearly double the other.
Both are uncited anyone know which is correct and/or cite source. 
Carlwev (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BBC reference says 35m. Highways agency reference says 29m. I'm inclined to favour the latter as being a more 'primary' source. Murray Langton (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This Highways Agency post-build review says 35m http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/documents/POPE___A249_Iwade_Queenborough_OYA_report__final.pdf. Good enough for me. danno 21:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: How high is the Sheppey Crossing?
Talk:Manhasset Secondary School

message: Pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhasset Lacrosse I have merged in such little sourced content as there was in that article. The history remains intact and more can be brought across if sources can be found. BlueValour (talk) 02:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge in of Manhasset Lacrosse
Talk:Absinthiana

message: I am planning to remove the unsourced information about absinthiana as collectibles from the lead. Reason: the claims are not that important, their details are not supported by any sources. I have already added an accurate (and based on the source) description of collectability of spoons (despite their mostly unglamorous appearance) into the corresponding section. Викидим (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Soon to be a year with no objections. Deleting. Викидим (talk) 00:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collectibles in the lead
Talk:Goodwin Sands

message: I believe the Ian Flemming James Bond book Moonraker takes place, at least partially, on the Goodwin Sands.  I will confirm shortly.  Can anyone confirm the 1950's ship wreck Flemming mentions??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illcommunication (talk • contribs) 18:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Map would be useful. Drutt (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: The citation for the supposed inundation of farmland that now forms the Goodwin Sands is Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable.  Is it right to justify a statement of fact to an acknowledged fable? Tagged --217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable events — 11th Century 

message: Any clues? Valetude (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the section Island of Lomea, in particular the link to Godwin, Earl of Wessex.  He was the father of King Harold Godwinson of 1066 fame. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Martin. And forgive my carelessness. Valetude (talk) 00:32, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was Goodwin? 

message: There is no explanation of why it was "controversial". The reference URL is dead, and archive.org has only the front page which does not mention it. Davidships (talk) 07:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial dredging
Talk:Pegwell Bay

message: Most of the existing gallery photos don't seem very illuminating (and some hardly show the subject at all).  But what is needed is one of the Viking boat. Davidships (talk) 15:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, am on wiki commons now, plenty of decent images on there ! Including  DavidAnstiss (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, that's just the job.  Davidships (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: While the ship may be referred to in the popular media as a replica 'Viking' ship, it's commemorating the landing of Hengist and Horse, two quasi-legendary figures who are supposed to have existed in the 5th Century several hundred years before the Viking phenomena began and who are considered key figures in the Anglo-Saxon, not the later Viking, invasion and settlement of Britain.  I have therefore made some changes to the body of the article to reflect this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.54.175 (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term 'Vikings' 

message: The claim that "The Bay has extreme tides, similar to those of the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia, Canada," strikes me as extremely improbable.  However, I only believe this through personal observation (to me it seems like only a couple of metres, unlike the 7 m extreme in Nova Scotia), so I have not touched the article.  But this big claim should be referenced - if this cannot be done then I think it should be removed.  MalcolmStory21 (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidal Range 

message: The date in the hovercraft photo caption looks wrong. It says July 1986, but the article states that hovercraft operated here from 1969 to 1982. Bcp67 (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hovercraft photo date
Talk:Casper de Vries

message: "At the beggining it says Casper de Vries (born ... Johannesburg)", then later it says "Casper, born in Pretoria", where was he born? Bezuidenhout (talk) 18:55, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article contradicts itself 

message: This article needs sources per WP:BLP or some culling is in order. Robvanvee 17:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BLP]] issues 

message: A whole new chapter is needed under the topic Radio. How can one accomplish this, without some Bot constantly deleting this valuable input? CJDV (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio
Talk:Heart Kent

message: WINC (AM) being a featured article, is worth looking at to see  how tricky sections, such as presenters, can best be dealt with SovalValtos (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Un-verifiable information about living persons should not be added to the article. This has been happening in the lists of presenters without even an edit summary. With no sources we simply cannot know if the information is true. Such entries may be WP:BLP violations. This type of original research does not make for stable encyclopedic material.SovalValtos (talk) 11:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA on radio station 

message: Who the hell is Magnus? 2A02:C7C:DCB7:9000:19C4:8CF5:3925:1376 (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnus
Talk:1998 NFL draft

message: An anonymous user who uses different IP addresses (2606:6000:ce83:8400:a0f1:8aad:7470:2c88, 2605:a000:140d:4329:b11d:cf36:5130:2d32 , 2605:a000:140d:4329:848d:f811:202d:ed5c, 2605:a000:140d:4329:c569:4f92:ca28:4a7a) has reverted the edits in the Notable Undrafted Player section of the 1999 NFL Draft, 1998 NFL Draft, 2009 NFL Draft, 1996 NFL Draft, 2007 NFL Draft, 1995 NFL Draft and others. Putting players that did not have a notable career and are just classified as undrafted. This is not the first time that it has happened with this user, so I would ask for somebody to review this case, because the essence of this section is being selective with the players being put there.Makers267 (talk) 18:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL Undrafted Players section
Talk:Cockpit (disambiguation)

message: The page that was originally here is now at Cockpit (aviation) (talk).  I've changed this to a disambig page, since the different uses of cockpit have diverged quite a bit and don't really belong in the same article (unless it were an article on the history of the word). David 12:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be better with cockpit (aviation) being here because about 90% of the links are reffering to that useage of the work. This would then be moved to cockpit (disambiguation) :: maelgwn :: talk 09:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, Cockpit (avitaion) should be the main article. --MoRsE 09:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done deal :: maelgwn :: talk 09:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems a bit odd that the original meaning (the place for a cock fight) isn't one of the articles.
Apepper (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing meaning
Talk:Coney Island Creek

message: The length of Coney Island Creek is given as as anything from 1.5 to 2 miles. The length seems to have changed due to land-filling in Gravesend Bay extending the "mouth" of "Coney Island Creek". This chart labels Coney Island Creek past those landfills out to Coney Island Creek Park. If that and Calvert Vaux Park park mark the current mouth of the creek then it measures out to 1.8 miles. If anyone can give a better referenced figure please add it. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Coney Island Creek Resiliency Study, New  York  City  Economic  Development  Corporation (NYCEDC) - 2016.07.08, pages 14-15 gives an exact definition of the creek as 1.8 miles divided into 5 reaches with the Shell road head of the Creek being Reach 1 and the mouth of  the Creek at the west end of Coney Island Creek Park and Calvert Vaux Park park being Reach 5. Seems authoritative.  Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length?
Talk:Horben

message: This article, on a town of 1800 people in Germany, appears to have been dumped, via Google Translate, from the German WP; the English is questionable, and half the text is still in German. 
It is also, at 17Kb, a ridiculous length for a town of that size, being too full of intricate detail of interest only to a specific audience, especially on a foreign-language WP. The articles for this place on other foreign language projects are 2-6Kb in length, and the English language articles on other towns in the same district are about the same. 
So I am trimming the bloat down to about 6KB, which is plenty; I am also removing the “may be expanded” template, as it doesn't warrant it. I trust everyone is OK with that. Moonraker12 (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 
Talk:FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies

message: this almost reads more like a bad advertisement than a proper wikipedia article.  not to take anything away from this freedomCAR program--i don't know enough about it to know whether the 'article' is actually correct and the only citation seems to be from the dept. of energy website.  
if anybody reading this knows more about the situation, please chime in.  in the future, i'm thinking this article feels like a stub at best, and perhaps (if it cannot be readily expanded) would be better off being merged (or inserted) into one of the alternative fuel/alternative fuel vehicles articles or perhaps under a current events/government programs page.  
--cid
: Alternative fuel is too long to include this article.--Nopetro (talk) 13:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Hamato Yoshi

message: Comics.==  76.179.248.26 (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute

message: -Reasons For being built
-MaCs program 
-Student body breakdown
-Past and current Student Assembly Council Members
-Athletics
-Mackenzie clubs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.251.46 (talk) 00:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Future sections

message: Didn't Howie Mandel (the comedian) go to Mackenzie?  128.100.71.45 (talk) 20:48, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a citation? RJFJR (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni
Talk:Cleebronn

message: The article sounds too "German" to me... meaning loads of spelling errors, grammar and similar mistakes... I am not the right person to look over it as i am German myself, but maybe someone who isn't German could look over it? --Hoerth (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Kirchardt

message: I'm currently translating the quite extensive German article. Not done yet, so please don't erase the (hidden) German text on the article page. Thanks! Taiwantaffy (talk) 13:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

message: "The appellation villa denoted that Kirchardt was then a small community not long settled." No, often long-established, villa still meant a self-sufficient agricultural community centered on a (perhaps defensible) farmstead and worked by villeins (a later usage). More than a few Roman villas in western Germany passed into the Merovingian fisc and were granted to found monasteries.--Wetman (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Villa]]"
Talk:Dörzbach

message: 16-Oct-2010: After noting the article "Dörzbach" had been viewed 10x per day, during mid 2010 (~300 stats.grok.se pageviews per month), I translated the German-WP version of the article, on 16 October, to expand the text beyond the 1-line intro with infobox. Knowing an intermediate level of German language, I used Google Translate to paraphrase the dewiki text, then corrected the partial translation, in sections, to match English word-order and idioms. The population data was already updated. The dewiki version still has some empty sections, so further translation could be attempted in several months, perhaps in early 2011. Beware, I have limited time, so my translation could use more smoothing and updating for better verbs. Also, the other 15 town articles, of the Hohenlohe (district), might need to be further expanded. -Wikid77 (talk) 19:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Translated from German WP

message: 18-Oct-2010: I set the population keyword "Einwohner=1" noting it as "any number" because the value is auto-set by the infobox, from population data stored elsewhere. If Einwohner=xx is not a number, then the infobox puts a Coordinates error of "invalid expression" or such. Many town articles should note the population number as being auto-set, because it is not yet an obvious idea to editors. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox population is auto-set
File talk:Universal Syriac Scout Association.png

message: File is being used in :Assyrian Scouting and Guiding and :Scouting and Guiding in Lebanon. The non-free use rationale provided for each usage claims the file is being used in the infobox at the top of the respective article which is not the case at all. Usage in "Scouting and Guiding in Lebanon" is purely decorative in a gallery of other images which is generally not allowed per :WP:NFG and :WP:NFCC#8. The file itself is not the subject of any sourced commentary so the context required for non-free use is not provided. Same goes for the file's usage in :Assyrian Scouting and Guiding#Emblems which also is in a gallery and lack the context required by NFCC#8. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep. I won't argue this for Lebanon, but especially given current events in the region, I think the image is necessary and useful for the Assyrian article.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free usage in "Assyrian Scouting and Guiding" and "Scouting and Guiding in Lebanon"