Talk:Grand Duchess Xenia Alexandrovna of Russia

message: Eldest daughter of a Czar played so much role in royal succession.. And neither a royal is found on a charity work. Monarch is a monarch and not a politcian..and such bizarre autography had proven itself of this fraud enpsychlopedic fraud propaganda..this is a capital crime and grave offense against Czar Alexander III real daughter and her family still alive. A royal princess of an empire is the owner of the state deed of absolute wills ..the very signature and legal reason  why Russia is a country..this is propaganda in perversion to what is Russia today...the heresy of prostitute. AS OF 1898 THE SIGNATURE OF USSR DEED OF ABSOLUTE WILLS IS NO XENIA HAD BEEN FOUNDED THERE...AND NEITHER TO ANY PERTIMENT PAPERS CZAR ALEXANDER III HAD ENUMERATED HIS CHILDREN..THIS NOTHING BUT A FRAUD BOGUS PUBLICITY OF WHICH THIS WIKIPEDIA IS ON COHORT..SELLING A FRAUD BOGUS STORY IN GRAVE MISCONDUCT ..AN INTENTIONAL FELONY AGAINST THE STATE OF RUSSIA AS A NATION AND TO THE WORLD..AN IDIOTIC SITE FOR THE FAKES TO SAVOR--112.198.242.214 (talk) 08:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This is not CZAR ALEXANDER III daughter there is no such thing as Xenia in the royal registry as the daughter of a Czar of Russia   

message: Maria Vladimirovna is NOT the Head of the Romanov Family. Nicholas Romanov is the head of the family. Morhange 20:36, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect: one of her sons could be head of the house if all senior males have lost their succession rights, for example. And also, a theoretical possibility of Xenia's son to be head through her comes from a hypothetical construction of all Russian dynasts, including him, losing their succession rights and then the cognatic succession is needed, and in the hypothetical construct, the cognatic line not needing to comply to marriage requirements on basis of the cognatic line not needing to be a part of the imperial house, and deciding their dynasticity requirements by themselves. Shilkanni 17:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As with Maud of Wales and Maria Fyodorovna, this page has been protected due to an edit war. Please discuss and come to some sort of conlusion. Craigy (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: The description reads: "Grand Duchess Xenia dressed for a costume ball in 1903. This seventeenth-century costume was the inspiration for a costume for Star Wars character Padmé Amidala in 2002."
Is this true? Morhange 19:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1903 Costume 

message: This page has been protected for the past three weeks. No discussion has occurred in the past two weeks. Are the issues being resolved and the disputed parties moving towards discussion? If there are no objections, I will request unprotection. Calwatch 00:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request unprotection?

message: ::::Apparently User:Morhange is a partisan of Nicholas Romanovich Romanov: . This statement of headship has apparently gone through several variants also in this article. 84.249.153.83 14:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  head of the house 

message: Are Andrej Andreevich Romanov (born 1923) and Prince Andrew Romanoff the same person or not? FrogBalancer 02:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrew Romanov

message: This page sure could use some help with respect to footnotes. While the page is pretty rich in citations, Wikipedia:Footnotes#Citing_a_footnote_more_than_once requests
Please do not use "ibid" or other footnote shorthands.
I started cleaning it up using named ref tags (like  ... ) but this article requires way more cleanup than I have time for right now.  
Requesting help here. 
Toddstreat1 18:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes need help 

message: The current citation is 
 ibid, p.27
but it immediately follows a citation
 
However, it appears  (judging only by page numbers) that it is really referring to 
 
But since ibid is used, I can't tell if this is sloppy use of ibid or correct citation. Please provide quote for verification. (this is why wikipedia doesn't use ibid - Wiki is not paper) 
Toddstreat1 19:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request Quote for citation #19 (ibid, p. 27) 

message: I have substantially cleaned up the article, hoping to address the concerns expressed as indicated by the article's tags. Please review whether the tags can now be removed. Thanks, Ohconfucius (talk) 11:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of 17 July 2009 

message: I'm sorry.  I've edited Wikipedia articles before, but I've never had to change a footnote.  This article asked for help with a footnote, and I knew the original source, having just finished rereading it.
I verified and added that source and tried to change a second footnote as well, because Van der Kiste was only quoting *Once a Grand Duke*, and the original source should always be quoted when possible.
Anyhow, I can't get my footnotes quite right, and somehow I've managed to muddle the numbering of a third footnote.  I've made several attempts to fix this and it's just not working.  Someone who knows more than I will need to straighten it out.
The two footnotes I was trying to add were:
For "Best wishes and speedy return!  Your sailor, Xenia."  -- Alexander, Grand Duke of Russia.  Once a grand duke. (Garden City, New York : Garden City, c1932), p. 94.
For "She is fourteen.  I think she likes me." -- Alexander, Grand Duke of Russia.  Once a grand duke.  (Garden City, New York : Garden City, c1932), p. 116.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.207.199.235 (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage and Family