Talk:Bauhinia

message: Can anyone identify this flower? It's certainly some kind of bauhinia, and while I'm about 90% sure it's B. purpurea, I don't want to start using it on anything until it's positively identified. It was taken on 1 March on Lantau island, Hong Kong, if that helps narrow it down... —  iridescent 19:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's an Azalea. It doesn't appear to be a Bauhinia at all. B. pupurea has entirely pink flowers without any white. CalamusFortis (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh... shows how much I know. Thanks! —  iridescent 18:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone identify this? 

message: More material (on Bauhinia Blakeana) here .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.64.168.196 (talk) 07:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More source

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bauhinia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150108234112/https://www.austintreeexperts.com/blog/anacacho-orchid-tree-bauhinia-congesta/ to https://www.austintreeexperts.com/blog/anacacho-orchid-tree-bauhinia-congesta
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bauhinia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517100307/http://www.ildis.org/ to http://www.ildis.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article includes two pictures which may be not quite right:
#  – purportedly of species †Bauhinia thonningii, which the article lists as a fossil; and
#  – of the species Phanera vahlii, which is not strictly speaking a "Bauhinia", but belongs to the sister genus Phanera.
Should they remain here?  yoyo (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right yoyo - moved to genus Phanera: also updated.  I think it is difficult to keep track with the species list - so am moving old version below here - useful to have a record of the updates (I have only managed to do some of the other genera). Roy Bateman (talk) 03:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  P. thonningii is a synonym of Piliostigma thonningii. Roy Bateman (talk) 04:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

text: @Roy Bateman Thanks for acting on this.  Yes indeed, how does one keep up with revisions in taxonomy! yoyo (talk) 05:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic pictures 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bauhinia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503085928/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?1337 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?1337
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified