lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pontifical College Josephinum

message: I greatly expanded this article when I did some research on the origin of the institution. When I attended PCJ in the early 70s I knew only a smattering of information on the school and its founder. With the internet, it is possible to fill in a lot of gaps.
I also created an article on Joseph Jessing, the founder of the seminary because, when I did some research at the Ohio Memory archives, I was really amazed at what this immigrant from Germany had accomplished. From childhood to his service in the Prussian army to his life in the US - truly amazing but little appreciated accomplishments for one man. Wanted to share his story - It needs a wider audience.
After leaving PCJ, I finished my studies at Michigan State University, and became a US Marine Officer active and reserve for over 20 years. Hence a better appreciation of Jessing's years as a soldier in that institution of "blood and iron," the Prussian Army.
I'm also looking for an out-of-copyright black and white photo of the school.
SimonATL 23:33, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note from a Josephinum Alumnus

message: "This trend continues today along with many other politically correct initiatives"
This statement appears to be biased and prejudicially opinionated. Referring to someone or thing as being PC is usually done in  a pejorative manner. The Wikipedia article on the topic of political correctness says that "In modern usage, the terms PC, politically correct, and political correctness are generally pejorative descriptors" []  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:E:2680:3CD:5178:12F:51A8:E927 (talk) 09:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC?
Talk:Joseph Jessing

message: I created this article when I did some research on the origin of the Roman Catholic seminary, the Pontifical College Josephinum institution (PCJ) for an expanded article on PCJ.  
When I attended PCJ in the early 70s I knew only a smattering of information on the school and its founder.  With the internet, it is possible to fill in a lot of gaps. 
In order to get more information when I worked on this article on Joseph Jessing, the founder of the Josephinum, I utilized State of Ohio "Ohio Memory" archives, and I was really amazed at what this immigrant from Germany had accomplished. From childhood to his service in the Prussian army to his life in the US - truly amazing but little appreciated accomplishments for one man. Wanted to share his story - It needs a wider audience.
After leaving PCJ, I finished my studies at Michigan State University, and became a US Marine Officer active and reserve for over 20 years.  Hence a better appreciation of Jessing's years as a soldier in that institution of "blood and iron," the Prussian Army.
I'm looking for an out-of-copyright black and white photo of the PCJ.
SimonATL 23:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note from a Josephinum Alumnus

message: Attention tag placed on this article because of problems with POV language.  PLease remove when problem is addressed.  -- Pastordavid 17:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention tag 
Talk:Donald Duck Party

message: I don't speak english well enough to edit this page, but it contains a major error.
The page claims that the votes are counted as if they were blank, which cannot be further from the truth. Actually all blank votes are deemed invalid and simply thrown away before the counting begins (a few other votes also are deemed invalid, such as multiple votes for different parties)
But a vote for any party, registered or joke, is counted as a valid vote and is accounted for.
This i very important as there are political limits in the swedish system. A party needs at least a certain part of the valid votes to get elected. And if there are valid joke votes, then the ordinary parties will have a harder race to get elected. If the joke votes would be counted as blank, that would lower the limits the ordinary parties have to brake -- but this is not the case.
AND this is very important. If a joke party would get a seat, that seat would be occupied by that persons name which has most frequently been written on the votes.—This unsigned comment was added by 83.209.34.128 (talk • contribs) 17 March 2006.
:The page has been edited per your suggestion.--Ezeu 00:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And your english is pretty good by the way. Borisblue 21:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Regarding this sentence:
 "In the 2010 elections, the party received 10722 votes, making it the largest party in the Swedish Riksdag elections."
What is it trying to say? The largest party was the Social Democrats with 1.8 million votes, so I assume there is a hidden error somewhere? --Christoffre (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Riksdag party?
Talk:Hustle (professional wrestling)

message: I always thought HUSTLE was closely affiliated with PRIDE, not K-1, since they shared the same parent operation. hateless 23:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: K-1

message: Was Hustle the same company that produced the Wrestle 1 event shortly before Hustle 1?
Eugenespeed (talk) 13:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to ja:WRESTLE-1, FEG (K-1) was responsible for Wrestle-1. hateless 04:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrestle 1

message: According to this news story, Shoichi Funaki wrestled a match with the promotion on 5/30.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.115.73.149 (talk) 04:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: HUSTLE is back?
Talk:Halmidi inscription

message: Please see Category talk:Earliest known manuscripts by language. Enaidmawr (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct category? 

message: In a recent article published in the center page of Vijaya Karnataka, Dr. Chidanandamurthy has said that it should be Hanmidi and not Halmidi. Any update planned ? Ramashray (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The village is currently called Halmidi, though it seems Hanmidi may be another name for the same village.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Halmidi/Hanmidi

message: I have added the Halmidi text in Kannada and the Indic text template. On my PC I have no problem in seeing Kannada script. If any script problem or font problems occur, please let us know. So that the admins or others can take corrective action. Regards. 27.57.4.57 (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be nice to also give some indication of its meaning... AnonMoos (talk) 16:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Text in Kannada and its support

message: Is a translation available online?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:7400:73:79A1:944:5145:DC78:EF35 (talk) 02:32, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Halmidi

message: I reproduce the relevant portion in third reference below.
:However, the etymology of the words "Kannada" and "Karnataka" are still a matter of controversy. Mr. Seetharamiah points out that the inscription found at Halmidi in Belur taluk of Hassan district is dated 450 AD, and it happens to be the earliest known record inscribed in Kannada characters; the language what can be termed as "Purvada Halegannada" and primitive Kannada with distinctive characteristics resembling those of Tamil.
According to the last sentence, the inscription  is of Kannada & has distinctively similar characteristics as that of Tamil. Praveen 13:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resemblance according to Reference

message: Halimidi inscription is in hale kannada script and there is no dispute regarding this, but unnecessarily it is being said it resembles tamil.  This is not a correct information.  the script is hale kannada and language is kannada and there is no dispute regarding this. Why insert tamil in this page it is vanadalism ≥meghamitra 11:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Megamitra, please do not remove well attested facts. Keep your emotions under control. And I will ignore your misguided comparison (personal attack) for the time being. Praveen 14:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving Meghamitra's comments from Talk:Halmidi\Comments

message: How far is Halmidi from Belur? If it's very close, shall we use the co-ordinates of Belur in the infobox? That would generate a nice locater map in this page. Anybody who knows the precise or approximate location? -- Sundar \talk \contribs 06:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Anyone can look at Halmidi inscription page and look at the kannada text to see what the inscription says. There is nothing that can point to similarity with tamil. Also the text clearly shows, if at all it has some similarity that can only be attributed to Proto-Kannada or oldkannada and I have included it. Someone in the news paper just wrote something and every web site just copied it without seeing the truth or the fact.Incredible..Grow up.Regards.27.61.29.23 (talk) 08:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  See kannada translation 
Talk:Dakosaurus

message: I'm pretty sure it's knicknamed "Godzilla". -Walkingwith08 (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this true? And where should I put it if it is? -Walkingwith08 (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

text: If there's a species page for this genus...THen is there one for Tyrannosaurus rex? -Walkingwith08 (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Godzilla" 
Talk:Deinodon

message: As a side note, Cope (1866) designated three of the Deinodon horridus syntypes (ANSP 9533-9535) as the lectotype of Deinodon horridus. These teeth were also made the syntypes of Aublysodon mirandus by Leidy (1868) (which made Aublysodon mirandus a junior objective synonym of Deinodon horridus). Later, Marsh (1892) designated ANSP 9535 as the lectotype of Aublysodon mirandus and restricted the lectotype of Deinodon horridus to ANSP 9533 and ANSP 9534. Five syntypes of Deinodon horridus (ANSP 9530, 9536, 9541-9543) were designated as a new species of Dryptosaurus, D. kenabekides, by Hay (1899). Since ANSP 9535 is now the lectotype of Aublysodon mirandus following Marsh (1892) and ANSP 9530, 9536, 9541, 9542, and 9543 are now the syntypes of Dryptosaurus kenabekides, the name Deinodon horridus is currently restricted to the lectotype ANSP 9533 and ANSP 9534 following Cope (1866) and Marsh (1892).
There is no point to keep the referred species of Deinodon in the Deinodon species list, since Deinodon horridus is a nomen dubium following Russell (1970). 
Cope, E.D., 1866, "Discovery of a gigantic dinosaur in the Cretaceous of New Jersey", Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 18: 275-279
Hay, O.P., 1899, "On the nomenclature of certain American fossil vertebrates", American Geologist 24: 345-349
Marsh, O.C., 1892, "Notes on Mesozoic vertebrate fossils", American Journal of Science, 44: 170-176
Russell, 1970. Tyrannosaurs from the Late Cretaceous of western Canada. National Museum of Natural Science Publications in Palaeontology. 1: 1–34. 93.158.38.43 (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deinodon syntypes
Talk:Denversaurus

message: "American paleontologist Robert T. Bakker considered Denversaurus distinct from Edmontonia and Chassternbergia in having a skull that was wide at the rear and a more rearward position of the eye sockets.[2] The holotype skull has a length of 496 millimetres and a rear width of 346 millimetres. In the referred specimen AMNH 3076 these proportions are less extreme, measuring 395 millimetres long with a rear width of 220 millimetre. According to American paleontologist and dinosaur book author, Kenneth Carpenter, the greater width was due to crushing"
What is being said here? What is "the referred specimen?" versus what? Please remove or clarify. --12.27.66.8 (talk) 01:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Allright.--MWAK (talk) 20:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:Nedoceratops

message: I'm removing the stub category for this.  It seems very thorough.  Anybody who thinks I'm wrong should just add it back on.
Devotchka 00:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: The Nomenclator Zoologicus entry for Diceratops (http://www.ubio.org/NZ/search.php?search=Diceratops&quickSearch=QuickSearch&selectall=Check+All&colname=on&colcategory=on&colauthority=on&colcomments=on&page=&vol=) shows that Diceratops Hatcher vide Lull, 1905 is pre-occupied by Diceratops Förster, 1868 (a ichneumonid hymenopteran insect). Because Diceratops is pre-occupied, put Diceratops in quotes, and a replacement name will assigned. I guess that the replacement name for Diceratops will be Diploceratops. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Original research, unfortunately. Ubless the fact that Diceratops is preoccupied is published somewhere, it's not our place to point that out here. Dinoguy2 05:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-occupation of the name Diceratops  

message: It looks like there is some evidence that Nedoceratops might in fact be some stage in the life of Triceratops.  Though till we get stronger evidence, its probably better to keep them separate, we might wanna mention the possibility somewhere.
http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2010/07/22/new-study-says-torosaurustriceratops/
71.234.123.137 (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't make definitive conclusions about Nedoceratops, but at least argues that Triceratops and Torosaurus are distinct, valid taxa. I've added its findings to the article, along with another arguing that all three are Triceratops.--Animalparty-- (talk) 03:28, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Triceratops  

message: The description of Diceratops hatcheri was planned for Hatcher, Marsh, and Lull's monograph The Ceratopsia. The article currently says that it was planned for a monograph on the Ceratopsidae. The monograph treats animals that are currently classified in the Ceratopsidae, whereas Ceratopsia refers to a broader group which includes Ceratopsidae. That being said, it is titled The Ceratopsia and throughout Marsh's writings, Ceratopsia is much more frequently used than Ceratopsidae. I think it would be better to refer to it in this article as the Monograph on the Ceratopsia as this is the actual title and not inaccurate, although it is limited to a subgroup of the Ceratopsia. But I'm putting this on the talk page because I want to hear other people's thoughts before making the edit. Skye McDavid (talk) 16:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ceratopsia is probably more correct, but its important to note that when it was published, the only ceratopsians known were ceratopsids so the alternative is not untrue. IJReid  01:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceratopsia or Ceratopsidae
Talk:Megabyte per second

message: Yes I know that redirecting to Megabyte per second results in a double-redirect, but what do we care? A minuscule amount of machine resource will just sort it out.
If the redirect target is snapped to the final target (Megabit per second), it could be harmful because someone might look at that and think that "MB/s" actually means "Megabits per second".
On balance, I think the double redirect is preferable here. Duckbill 23:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Double redirects grossly undesirable.  What that says is that Megabyte per second should be an article not a redirect.  I have created it. Cburnett 00:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed.  (Though it's yet another one to fight over...)  I asked on Talk:Bit_rate#Merging_the_little_bit_rate_articles.3F if it was worth creating separate articles for each.   For now I'll copy the bit rates and we can merge later? Let's discuss it before I do all that work.  Should we merge these all into one byte per second article?  And the others into bit rate? — Omegatron 02:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double redirect
Talk:Dinodocus

message: Dinodocus is considered a non-titanosauriform macronarian by Mannion et. al. (2013). 
Mannion, P. D., Upchurch P., Barnes R. N., & Mateus O. (2013).  Osteology of the Late Jurassic Portuguese sauropod dinosaur Lusotitan atalaiensis (Macronaria) and the evolutionary history of basal titanosauriforms. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1-109. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 18:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-titanosauriform affinities
Talk:Diplotomodon

message: Does anyone know what sort of creature is the original 'Tomodon'? The lumper that redirected all of the synonymous links has made it impossible to find out on Wikipedia. CFLeon 22:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I found it. It's a snake of Family Colubrididae. CFLeon 21:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dravidosaurus

message: On some websites Dravidosaurus has been listed as "no longer considered to be a Dinosaur".  It lists it as a plesiosaur now, because the skeleton was very incomplete so it was just thought to be a Stegosaur.  Is it actually a Plesiosaur?  User:Jntg4
Unless anyone can actually cite a recent good source, Dravidosaurus should be placed back into the Stegosauridae. As of 2004, it was still included within the Dinosauria (Galton & Upchurch). I note also that the Natural History museum also continues calling it a stegosaur, even while acknowledging the Chatterjee objection: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/nature-online/dino-directory/detail.dsml?Genus=Dravidosaurus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.173.209.117 (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be more inclined to just classify it as a thing (diapsid, actually, as that includes plesiosaurs and stegosaurs), until further notice. J. Spencer (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaur Status 

message: I was looking for a reconstruction of Dravidosaurus and I couldn't find anything ('sides the Stegosaur-based interpretations...) At the very least, do we know if it was a Plesiosauroid or a Pliosauroid? David Fuchs 14:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got me. I don't know if anyone has done much with it since Chatterjee. J. Spencer 21:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This recently came up on... DinoForum maybe? Yeah, Chatterjee was the last one to look at it, and he didn't do much other than point out that the stegosaur was a plesiosaur. Dinoguy2 14:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Okay, now I'm confused. Is the main article correct? Is it a stegosaur or a plesiosaur? If it is a plesiosaur, is it long-necked or short-necked? 70.80.215.121 (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems it is a stegosaur again, and the article should be edited accordingly. FunkMonk (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well?
Talk:Dromiceiomimus

message: From here: " In 1972 two ornithomimids were described as the new genus Dromiceiomimus (meaning 'emu mimic') but in 2004 it was shown that these specimens actually belonged to O. edmontonicus (Russell 1972, Makovicky et al. 2004)." FunkMonk (talk) 06:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunk? 

message: I will again make Dromiceiomimus because Dromi has 9 neck vertebrae, and Ornithomimus - 10. Ornithomimus article says that D. is a junior synonym, however both d. and o. are the same size, and legs and eyes of Dromiceiomimus are longer and larger! John Troodon(talk)
: That would be WP:OR. Abyssal (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's OR. Have you done a thorough study to determine that he number of vertebrae is not variable and has been correctly reported for both forms? MMartyniuk (talk) 02:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  A violation of priority? In dinosaur paleontology? *ironic expression of shock* ;) MMartyniuk (talk) 12:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vertebrae
Talk:Dryosaurus

message: would who ever added the statement that "some scientists suggested that it stored food in its cheeks" please provide the reference for this? Who are these "scientists"?
Anky-man 20:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a look at it.  My guess is someone was trying to describe the idea of keeping food in, but the sentence ended up reading as if the animal stored food in the way rodents do. J. Spencer (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  storing food 

message: Given the fact that the Morrison and Tendaguru have much less in common than for a long time pretended, it is really questionable to stick with Dryosaurus lettowvorbecki. On the other hand, off the top of my head I don#t know any recent publications looking at the issue - all I have is unofficial opinions. HMallison (talk) 21:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dysalotosaurus 
Talk:Dryptosaurus

message: "In 2017, it was given the new generic name Teihivenator." This generic name is not available according to the ICZN.http://dml.cmnh.org/2017Jul/msg00068.html This should not be treated as a valid or available generic name by Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.93.51 (talk) 21:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This really would be better off at the Teihivenator talk page, in my opinion. And in any case, we'd need to wait for published works stating that the name is invalid before making it so on Wikipedia; that's how we do things here. Raptormimus456 (talk) 05:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it is only relevant to note details about validity in the article about the new genus, not here. FunkMonk (talk) 13:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Teihivenator" 

message: "Dryptosaurus was 6.5 m long, 1.8 m high at the hips, and weighed about 1.2 tons." -- Anybody have a clue whether the "tons" here were (in the original source) short tons, metric tonnes, or what? (The weight "estimate" should be more or less the same either way, but it's nice to avoid sloppiness in these matters.) -- Writtenonsand (talk) 22:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight 
Talk:What a Girl Wants (film)

message: I've never even seen this movie, but I remember there being a weird controversy about the poster and its patriotic content. Here's a link to a discussion of that controversy - http://www.filmhead.com/features/wagw.html - just in case anyone's invested and wants to add this to the article. H0n0r 23:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bynes' right arm was "airbrushed" out? Compare the poster in the article with the one at http://www2.warnerbros.com/whatagirlwants/. It's not the same photograph. Note, for example, that the photograph in the article exposes more of the epaulet on the right beefeater.  Observe also the variance between the positions of his belt vis-à-vis the bottom of the American flag on Bynes' shirt. On Bynes, note the varying angulation of the loose end of the belt strap, the difference in parting of the hair, and the extent to which her hair falls behind her right shoulder. Rammer (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Airbrushed" out?
Talk:Amy Yasbeck

message: I removed the fact that she played different characters in two Problem Child movies, at it was irrelevant to the "Personal Life" section in which it appeared. -Big Smooth 00:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not relevant to her personal life; it is relevant to her career. Therefore that info should be in the article, but not in the Personal life section. Qzm (talk) 22:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: Why is her name given in Arabic?  Why this over any other language?  If there is no response within a few days, I'll remove it. — Val42 05:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arabic?

message: I attended high school at UA with Amy's older sister, Ann. Ann told us she was a cousin to Danny Thomas. I never see any reference to this in articles about Amy. Has this subject ever come up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msbaldwin (talk • contribs) 04:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation of Danny Thomas?