lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stew Albert

message: While looking for an article about Stew Albert today, I discovered that there are two! While Stewart Albert was his formal name, he was practically universally known as Stew. (His autobiography is titled Who the Hell is Stew Albert?) Therefore I propose merging the two articles and keeping them under this name. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 00:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to wait.  This is an obvious case of two articles about the same person.  I say, go ahead and merge.  Wikidemo 21:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I am deleting the picture because it is celebrating the subject and there is not enough information given by the uploader to demonstrate its provenance.  129.71.73.248 23:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I respect the fact that it celebrates the subject, but its provenance? It was provided by Albert's widow, who is the author of the image, for use in his article. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 00:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How can that possibly be verified, though?  I understand that there are labyrinthine rules pertaining to the uploading and usage of images, but the user in question solely made edits regarding this topic and picture and all we have to go on is the fact that this anonymous person says it is so.  129.71.73.248 00:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll e-mail Judy Gumbo and ask her to verify it. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 00:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't know her, but her e-mail address is available at her website and Stew Albert's. I also prefer the cropped picture, but I'll check that we have her permission to use the image, otherwise I'll delete it. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 01:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Stig Wennerström (colonel)

message: So, he betrayed his country to both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.  Do we have any idea why? J S Ayer (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motive 
Talk:James Provan

message: "if Notable YouTube users does not fit, a more broad category does not either, please discuss on talk page if further conversation is needed"
Why? the video is on you tube. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bole2 (talk • contribs) 
:Hmm... Let's see what Bschott thinks. I'm honestly not sure about what category this should be in. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 18:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted you tube category 

message: Why is this tagged to be speedied? If the boy has made such an incredibly successful video, shouldn't this have been deleted more speedily if he wasn't notable enough? --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 21:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: A merge into Notable YouTube memes has been suggested. However, I think this should wait; the article to be merged to is for deletion. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 10:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Euphemia

message: The story of the Church Fathers placing copies of their differing views in the tomb of the saint to have her settle their dogmatic dispute is clearly legendary.  No reputable history of the Fourth Council mentions it.  The citation quoted is not actually found in the 98th Letter to Pope Leo as found in the New Advent site cited----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.199.50 (talk) 06:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention that if it were true, it would clearly have constituted an act of necromancy, and surely someone would have criticized it. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 19:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miracle during the Council of Chalcedon. 

message: Their track titled "Euphemia" is definitely named for, and based on, the anime character. Their band name, as well as the track which follows Euphemia on the album (Knightmare/Frame), are references to the very same anime, Code Geass, and the song very well describes a scene about halfway through the first season of the anime.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.155.100 (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 11 

message: the article twice mentions killed by a bear, but the image shows lions.  Is there an explanation that could be part of the text?  Or an image corresponding with the text? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Lion depiction accounts for the miraculous healing of her tortuous wounds inflicted by the Wheel. 2603:8000:9300:42CE:D44:11B0:8E83:3ADA (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  image
Talk:Robert Wolke

message: the individual books, though perhaps possibly notable by themselves, are nonetheless not appropriate for individual articles. We do not normally break out every nonfiction book of an author, unless its a particularly important author--we might do it for Einstein. Combining the information is a more appropriate treatment.DGG (talk) 17:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems fair enough. When I went looking for references for the first book I found far more references which were really about the author, even where they mentioned one or more of the books in passing. There was at least one real review, but it could easily just be referenced on the author's page. Which isn't really very big anyway. MadScot (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: proposed merges

message: What does the L. in the middle of his name mean? Joli Tambour (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Sybille Bedford

message: The title of Mrs. Bedford as child was not that of a "Freiin", which means the same as "baronesse". Her fathers family was nobilitated, but never ennobled to "Freiherr/baron". So Sybille Bedford was born as Sybille von Schoenebeck.Lothar Balhorn (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That is true, and I have edited accordingly. But the difficulty is that in English people unfamiliar with the notion of untitled nobility often call untitled German nobles "Baron". We shall see if the edit "takes". - Nunh-huh 22:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of Sybille Bedford as child 

message: Although obviously correct for the time of her birth, it may be misleading to talk of Charlottenburg as being  to the "west of Berlin". It was incorporated into Berlin in 1920.--~~~ Ralfdetlef (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlottenburg  

message: According to the biography of Bedford by Selena Hastings, Sybille's father was born in 1863, not 1853. 
Also, her half-sister Henriette was from Schoenebeck's first marriage to Melanie Hertz, not Marchesani. Oddly, Marchesani is the surname of Sybille's mother's second marriage, from which there were no half-siblings. Epikoros (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sybille's early life
Talk:Aria Curzon

message: Hi in my attenpts to edit Aria Curzon's filmography section I seemed to have accidentally affected the external links section. I tried to fix it several times, as evidenced by my editing history on this page, hopefully it can be fixed by someone more accoustomed  to this type of editing. Sorry for any inconveniences, it was an honest mistake Butler1993 (talk) 01:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Gaudentius of Brescia

message: This article needs re-written so that it is more than just a cut and paste from the catholic encyclopedia.  -- Pastordavid 04:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention Tag 
Talk:John Ogilvie (saint)

message: I don't know on exactly what historical authority, but the missal for Jesuit Saints says that John Ogilvie joined the Jesuits in 1599.  It would be very unlikely that he would join the Jesuits on the date given and be ordained just two years later.
62.49.64.66 (talk) 14:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missal for Jesuit Saints

message: The man died on March 10, but his feast is a) not on the General Calendar of the Roman Church and b) celebrated on Oct. 14 by the Society of Jesus.  Unless any speak against, I will change it to Oct. 14.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: a slight correction, his feast in Scotland is on March 10, but in the general SJ is on Oct. 14.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  feast day 

message: The unsourced line about him being the patron saint of young people and people with AIDS has been removed, because I suspect that this is a deliberate hoax. There is nothing about this in AmericanCatholic.org, CatholicSaints.org, Catholic Encyclopedia, or the Catholic Dictionary. If it is to be restored it will need a verifiable source. Pjposullivan (talk) 15:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Patron Saint
Talk:Computational photography (artistic)

message: This discussion has been moved to here, along with the accompanying article text,
from its original location on the page Computational photography.
See the discussion in that article for the justification for this move.
I am a new Wikipedia editor, and I now realize I did not follow proper procedure
when performing this move, because I have left the article history behind;
I apologize for making this procedural error.
The author of the original article (whose text is now here),
is encouraged to redistribute his text to more appropriate entries of the Wikipedia,
then to delete this page.  I have not proposed the article for deletion myself,
out of deference to the author (evidently Steve Mann, whose work I admire).
In particular, the material in this article on PDM and PLM
should probably be merged into the entries on high dynamic range imaging,
and the material on wearable computing should be merged into the appropriate entry.
The material on Charles Wyckoff's non-digital "computational photography" is interesting, but it is no longer in keeping with modern usage of this phrase and should perhaps be filed under another entry.  Finally, the citation of Mann's
pioneering paper on high dynamic range imaging
has been retained in the rewritten article at computational photography.
MarcLevoy 05:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article moved
Talk:Macrina the Younger

message: The box says Macrina died in 379, so say some other sources I found. German WP also has 379 so maybe this should be changed. --Proofreader 15:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen both 379 and 380 listed in different sources.  I'll see if I can research it further.  Majoreditor 05:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the birth date in the text and the infobox don't match--FeanorStar7 11:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vanished (TV series)

message: can anyone explain the reasoning of the removal of the information reguarding the "mysterious society"/freemason's bit in the article?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanz (talk • contribs) 01:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The episode guide needs some summaries; someone please work on this.Transcendentalstate 13:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Guide

message: The article contains sections titled "Senators Voting For Judge Wallace Rainer" and "Senators Voting Against  Judge Wallace Rainer" without ever mentioning who Judge Wallace Rainer is or what his relevance is. This would be useful information to add to the article. - Brian Kendig 17:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Judge Wallace Rainer?

message: This was a great show.  I'm sad to see it go. 67.124.200.72 00:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the worst show's I've ever seen. You have horrible taste.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyborg Ninja (talk • contribs) 17:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancelled

message: I'm going to pull the POV stuff in the production history back out because it is not only unencyclopedic in tone, but, as implied, stakes out a point of view with respect to the series and casting decisions made with respect to it.  I watched the show too.  It was a fine show.  That does not, however, mean that we ought to push any particular view with respect to the actors.Cool moe dee 345 12:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV in Production History

message: I have been waiting for ages for the vanished new season to start and now after reading the information on this website im devo... Im so upset. When i was over seas i even bought the first series dvd pack only to find out that there wont be an ending. Cant the producers organise something even if its not airing the program but making dvd's. Cheers kc 122.148.197.60 (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your kidding 

message: "Senator Collins' ex-wife had confronted Sara over the birth of her child, who was being raised by her parents as a sister, instead of a granddaughter." 98.92.214.246 (talk) 03:51, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this sentence messed up?
Talk:Mechthild of Hackeborn

message: Added a tone tag, since it seems over hagiographical and sentimental; not really an NPOV--FeanorStar7 08:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted and remedied. After edits for style, citations to external sources and more thorough intra-wiki cross-referencing to significant characters of Roman Catholic mystical spirituality I deleted  MrsKrishan (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral Point of View

message: I recommend renaming this page to "Mechtilde of Hackeborn" for clarity. Also, can anyone demonstrate that this Mechtilde is the one typically referred to when using the name only without further specificity? I wonder if Mechtilde of Magdeburg is more famous. Without clarity on this, I would suggest making this a Disambiguation page rather than just redirecting, although I realize that makes a mess of links here. Any advice on the best way to do this?
Sondra.kinsey (talk) 06:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename for clarification
Talk:King in Prussia

message: Did the Kings of Poland actually use the title "King of Prussia"?  It was my understanding that the name Royal Prussia was used because it was the part of Prussia ruled by the king of Poland, not by the "King of Prussia" a title which didn't exist until 1772.  Am I mistaken? john k 01:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, the Polish kings did not use the title "king of Prussia", they used a string of titles beginning with the following items: ... By God's grace king of Poland, grand duke of Lithuania, duke of Russia, Prussia and Mazovia ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jidu Boite (talk • contribs) 17:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Nilus the Younger

message: There are also St. Nilus of Stolbnyi Island and Nil Sorsky. There should be a disambiguation page. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a mistake: The "hermitage Valleluce" is not Nilus' foundation near Gaeta. It was his monastery, when he stayed on the lands of the Abbey St Benedict of Montecassino.
--Platonykiss (talk) 13:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valleluce is near Montecassino!
Talk:Prasada

message: How has Prasad, or Persaud come to be a common last name in the Caribbean? Dogru144 01:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: common name in the Caribbean

message: Article needs to be rewritten using good sources. Prasad is being confused for Naivedya. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be rewritten 

message: Should be Prasadam or Prasada, prasad is not a real word.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.74.132.39 (talk) 07:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prasad. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Paul_012 (talk) 08:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Prasad" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Hi all, 
This article has a lot of potential but a majority of the content is unsourced. Some of the sources refer to primary texts such as Hindu scripture, with no reference to secondary sources. This does not conform to Wikipedia's core content policy No Original Research-- WP:NOR. Would love to work with some of the authors of this article to find sources for a lot of this content. Unsourced content is typically deleted-- WP:USI.
Thanks so much, 
Skubydoo (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Content 

message: Naivedya is the food offered to God; Prasada is the same food after being sanctified. The rules of offering and making the food are overlapping aspects and thus can be covered in the same article. Redtigerxyz  Talk  15:44, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support They both seem like different words for the same thing, but at different stages of worship. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Naivedhya]] into [[Prasāda]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 18:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Prasāda →  – The word Prasāda is used without diacritics (non-IAST form)  Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Hinduism has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 December 2021
Talk:Olivia of Palermo

message: This article would be improved with a century when she is supposed to have lived.  Also the inconsistency between :en:Saint Olivia and :fr:Sainte Olive on whether the feast day is 10 June and 5 March does not help. --Rumping 20:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two different St. Olivia's.  I've moved this one to "Olivia of Plaermo"  ans "see also'd" the other. Peter Flass (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need this because people dont knoe what she looks lik e  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.146.121.113 (talk) 20:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why we need pictures of saint Olivia
Talk:Ashfaqulla Khan

message: Statements like "Ashfaq was a lion among men" don't instill faith that this article is unbiased. -Nv8200p talk 22:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They will be deleted. IT isnt NPOV.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, so much improvement in such short amount of time.  I hardly recognized it.  Good work! I'm really impressed.  Zephyr2k 23:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what to do with "greatness of the Hindu religion".  Needs to be reworded I think. Zephyr2k 00:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Thats not POV because that is expressing Bismiljis views. What is POV is " a lion among men". Bakaman Bakatalk 17:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may consider it as biased (British did not think in this way), but for Indians Ashfaq certainly a lion among men. Secondly, there is no need to mention the interaction between Bismil and Ashfaq. That was between them and I do not think that has any substantiation. It is natural that there might have been some initial doubts though muslims in those days were not bitten by the 'Jehadi' bug (disloyalty to their own country). The matter of fact is that Ashfaq and Bismil, both, became immortal for Indians by sacrificing their lives. My homage to the brave freedom fighters. Aupmanyav 15:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I intend to change the paragraph 'Frienship With Ramprasad Bismil'. Ramaprasad was a devout hindu, he was known among his fellow revolutionaries as 'Panditji'. I doubt if Bismil at anytime might have tried to show any superiority of Hinduism over Islam. Ashfaq on his part was a devout muslim. People in India at that time did not engage in the one-up manship as they do now. I have no doubt that Bismil and Ashfaq respected each other and other person's religion. Debate is something else, we all do it here in Wikipedia, Bismil and Ashfaq also may have engaged in it. Aupmanyav 04:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Petra Arkanian

message: Armenian
Armenian is not Asian and European.  Nor is it "culturally European."  Culturally, it is unique, and geographically, Armenia is in Asia.  Therefore, let's not have Petra listed as Asian and European.
Does her name have any particular significance? There's an old Roman siege weapon, Petraria Arcatinus, that makes me wonder.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatnewguy (talk • contribs) 14:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Saint Prisca

message: I believe this figure to be the same person as Tatiana (rome) c.228. A priestess of Isis that accepted Jesus. The reason that there is no historical record of her in Roman Catholic archives of any substance is; I believe; that there was a group of Gnostics that created a secret Temple of Gnosis, in her name. That Temple can be found in the usurped Baroque Cathedral in Taxco, Guerrero, Mexico. That was stolen by the Spanish, under edict by a Parisian named Borda; for the electrum mine that is under that Edifice. That Temple is a place of Gnosis that teaches, and displays the 22 major Tarot card trumps; along with the old Testament Kabbalistic tree of life displaying the 
Sepherioth. It is a Temple of Isis, and much older than the 250 odd years given to its construction. A very mysterious place, Given the lack of any official recognition of Prisca/Tatiana by the Vatican. Most all, if not all; Large Cathedrals have been constructed in the name of a Saint that has an actual following on record.
Acktheleone (talk) Moved from article to Talk by Afaprof01 (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  same person as Tatiana 

message: The article cites a moderately recent (1900) children's book of Christian legends by Abbie Farwell Brown. That book of legends is online at Project Gutenberg and other places, but it doesn't itself have references. Where did Brown get this detailed legend? St. Prisca may well be "ahistorical", but even if she were a fabrication, it would be interesting to know if she was a fabrication from the 3rd, 10th, or 20th century.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.97.76.146 (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for legend 

message: You do not starve for not eating for 72 hours... --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starved for three days?
Talk:John C. Trautwine

message: Hi,  I'm wondering about your change of "author" to "engineering journalist" in the lead. Was Trautwine a journalist? The cited sources talk about his engineering reports and handbooks, which would appear to be works of engineering, not journalism. PRRfan (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers PRRfan ... thanks for the comment. there is a Category:American engineering writers that has 24 pages are in this category. I would definitely recommend putting Trautwine in this category. As to the other 24 people in this category the structure of the articles very. Compare William Hubert Burr and "published works" to that in Richard Felder with professional contributions. I agree with you on your assessment that the section titling is problematic and thank you for reaching out to me to discuss this. We can go back to making this material part of the career section or retitle the section to Legacy. I would propose the latter. Your thoughts?... cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi,  thanks for discovering the American engineering writers category; Trautwine definitely belongs in it. As for the section title, how about "Engineering writings"? Or perhaps "Engineering reference books"? Or simply just "Books"? PRRfan (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "journalist" or "author"?