lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Giovanni Paisiello

message: This is pure opinion, and seems to violate Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View.  It is one certainly not held by me, and I`m sure I am not alone in that regard.  I think that this should be removed.  I looked up this article because I was listening to Paisiello`s "Il barbiere di Siviglia" this morning, and was disappointed to find such slant in the article.  I am sure I am not the only one in the world who considers him to have been a great composer.  Smyslov 2 June 2006
Removed it again. I for one do not consider Cherubini or Méhul to have been greater composers than Paisiello, and this statement is violation of Neutral Point of View. Smyslov 17:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Two far greater composers"? 

message: "Il Barbiere di Siviglia", it is now acknowledged as Rossini's greatest work, while Paisiello's opera is consigned to oblivion'
What? Paisiello's "Barbiere" consigned to oblivion?
:"...is known only to connoisseurs of opera"? "...is only infrequently produced"/ What? --10:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consigned to oblivion? 

message: The newly added list of works is great.  Could we split it off into its own article?  DavidRF (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Works should have its own article 
Talk:Hussey's General Store

message: This article was deleted initially with the explanation that it was "advertising". I disagree with the action on the grounds that it is a notable organization in the state of Maine especially for being the largest store in a state of several million people, and is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Edit: added signature; Ben Tibbetts 23:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I vote keep, but can you at least supply some pictures? That would be nice. Also, the article is kinda stubby. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It might be appropriate to merge this article into Windsor, Maine if there isn't enough material to justify an independent article. Ought to exist in one location or the other, though. Mackensen (talk) 01:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, I see that. The article is taking shape. It would nice to have more sources (especially if some local newspaper backs up the largest general store claim). Mackensen (talk) 02:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dealing with Dragons

message: I've added a 'Reception' section, with info about reviews/awards won by the novel. It may not have reached Tolkien-level fame, but it was fairly well-received in the real world! :) Alanna the Brave (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed a few descriptions that didn't seem to fit the character and removed some that were inaccurate. This is a great book and the article doesn't do it justice.--Brain 22:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Cimorene is a spunky and smart princess who uses her head and doesn't let others do her thinking for her simply because “she's a princess”. She goes through all sorts of trials, but she gets through them.  Sometimes on the (good) advice of others, sometimes by luck, but most often it is through either preparation or sound reasoning. Cimorene builds a good circle of friends around her and does her best to help out her friends and those she cares about, and even those who want to eat her. She isn't a patty-perfect shero who fears no monster, conquers everything at the first attempt, and saves the day without mussing a single perfect golden lock. Nor is she the patty-perfect princess, as the pattern is set by her country. That's what's so appealing about this book: the princess Cimorene. And the humour and adventure, of course. I would recommend it to just about anyone. It's an awesome book that I would recommend for anyone. It is focused more towards girls, but it's got a little of something for just about everyone. Humour, princesses and knights, witches, magic, adventure, and dragons! I mean, what more do you want? There's nothing offensive in this book, and it's a great book for a family, too. This book is also available on audiotape and would make be great for a long drive or family trip.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.201.20.185 (talk) 16:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Category talk:Protista

message: There really should be an article called Protista that is not a re-direct page. --JWSchmidt 15:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: there is also a page:
Dictyostelid
which is far better than the page:
Dictyosteliomycota
wich IS listed.  Wikiskimmer 19:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  how do i add a page to this category?
Talk:Recombination

message: Can someone who understands cell biology please help! The phrase "(or change of phase)" seems to be wrong. I've searched wikipedia and google and can find no evidence that "phase" has a meaning equivelent to "crossing over" or "Genetic recombination". I am attempting to fix disambiguation problems for "phase" but it seems the better soultion is to just delete this text. If you understand cell biology and agree with me please delete. Thanks --Msebast 23:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just some food for thought... the article starts out by saying "Recombination usually refers to.." and goes on to discuss a biological process. This might be the case for someone coming from a biology background. However, coming from a physics background, recombination usually refers to an electron becoming bonded to an atom. Perhaps it might be  worthwhile to make this article more neutral with respect to the different meanings in each subject? Privong 14:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and split it up so that it doesn't favor biology, as that might mislead a reader who's looking for a definition in a different subject. Privong 04:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Usually" 
Talk:2006 in Australia

message: Is the naming of a Danish prince (21 January) a significant Australian event such that it should be listed here?--A Y Arktos\talk 23:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is.  Marriage yes, birth yes, christening no. -- Chuq 04:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The information appears to be incorrect anyway, with the entry here stating the birth occured in Hobart, whereas the Mary, Crown Princess of Denmark article mentions Rigshospitalet in Denmark. I'm in support of removing it. -- Longhair 08:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: *Removed - I think the born in Hobart mention was a potentially ambiguous reference to Mary being born in Hobart.  Unlike Chuq I don't think any of the events relating to the Prince and Princess of Denmark are of any relevance to Australian events - it is not that I don't wish them well - I wish all newly weds and all parents well and we don't list them all :-) - they have no relevance to Australia.--A Y Arktos\talk 09:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of events
Talk:Khersones (ship)

message: It seems that the dimension currently labeled as height must be sail area.  I have no specialist knowledge in this area and do not feel comfortable correcting it. Leeannedy 23:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the image size. I am not a sailer either, my specialty is toy trains actually, but I am trying to work on many different areas here on wikipedia, when I have the time, because I want to expand my knowledge, Pernambuco 01:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Height or Sail Area

message: Stolen from Ukraine after annexation of crimea 2601:600:817F:C640:B18E:52FD:D10A:7F82 (talk) 05:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Crimea was annexed in 1994? That's news to me, but i'm not about to question our "heroes of democracy". 180.244.139.249 (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Russian ship
Talk:Oban distillery

message: Merged as requested. SilkTork 22:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: The distillery was built in 1794 by the brothers John and Hugh Stevenson and operated by him until 1866 when it was bought by Peter Curnstie
Does "him" above refer to one of the brothers, did they (or one of them) really operate the distillery for 72 years after they built it??? Finnrind 22:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone clarify this? 

message: I recently visited Oban distillery and was told that the distillery (as one of only few in Scotland) don't use caramel coloring for their whisky. Later, back in Germany I went to a spirit shop and bought a bottle of oban 14 yo (standard edition). On this bottle I found a lable reading "enthält Zuckerkulör" (contains caramel coloring) and asked if this information was true because I was told otherwise by the distillery. The answer in the shop wasn't satisfying, so I wonder if someone could make a research about this. Would be a nice info, if on the Oban page, IMO. TIA, Jan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.189.22.32 (talk) 08:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  caramel coloring in Oban single malt? 

message: "The town of Oban in Argyll sprung up around the distillery after it was built." I have tagged that as needing a source, and it looks rather implausible. The port of Oban is in a strategic location where the Firth of Lorn meets the Sound of Mull and it is unlikely that the distillery was there before the port or the settlement. Sources please. Kosebamse (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this has been removed, and I agree it seems unlikely, but here is a source:  Kendall-K1 (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claim 
Talk:240 (number)

message: The fact that this number appears in 2 core sequences of the OEIS and 192 nice sequences contradicts the supposed non-notability of this number, in my opinion. Anton Mravcek 21:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the concern, but this is correct.  244 is not currently considered notable enough to receive its own article, thus information on 244 is rolled up into the article for the factor of ten below it. Jesterjester (talk) 21:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Nepenthes × hookeriana

message: The name "hookeriana" should be corrected. Article 60.11 of the code of nomenclature specifies that there should be no "i" before the "ana". Nadiatalent (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: While this may be what the code states, it is not our job to correct species names - we should simply be reporting what reliable sources say. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia should be descriptive not prescriptive. Every single source I have ever come across (and I have read hundreds of papers on these plants, as well as all the major monographs) uses the spelling hookeriana. So following usage by reliable sources, the article should be at Nepenthes × hookeriana. mgiganteus1 (talk) 03:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the species name 
Talk:Jacquie Durrell

message: hi
does anyone know anything about Jacquie's life after her divorce from Durrell? And also is she still living?
:No one that I know knows much about her. Douglas Botting interviewed her for the biography. I guess she wants to keep a low profile. Pradiptaray 01:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CEFCU Stadium

message: ----
The category NCAA Bowl Game Venues includes stadiums that hosted Bowl Games at any point.  While the Silicon Valley Classic is no longer played at Spartan Stadium, the category is still valid.  --fuzzy510 00:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The redirect Spartan Stadium (San Jose, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 23:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Spartan Stadium (San Jose, California]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bio Planet WoO

message: There is too much Japanese for the average reader to understand what the article is about. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese only seems to exist for a few episode names. It doesn't really inhibit understanding of what the article is about. I've thus removed the tag. It may not be appropriate to have as much Japanese, but it isn't really hindering understanding or making it too technical. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:We Be Burnin'

message: is legalize it the original version? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.200.243.113 (talk) 02:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original? 
Talk:Lindor

message: I believe we should remove that section of the article, since it really is useless. It tells nothing of the chocolate, and really, no one is going to care for it. --Steven 00:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ... However, if we turned the prose flavor list into a table or bulleted list, with the color of the wrapping matched to the flavor, that would be useful. --BlueNight 17:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well now that we have a table, the paragraph that follows is unnecessary75.45.184.228 (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ingredients by flavour

message: I'm getting confused now. Isn't Lindor the product of Lindt? Can't we merge these two pages? Applejaxs 21:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely agree with you. Besides the fact that many parts of both articles are totally useless (ingredients, different flavours of ice cream...), they both relate to the same brand, and are both relatively minor articles. Why sould there be a special page about Lindor? Is it that special? Dmontin 18:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well.  Most of this information is already in the Lindt & Sprüngli article.  I'll copy over anything notable that isn't already there, and will redirect this page.  Gh5046 (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge is complete.  Gh5046 (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: i don't think the filling is meant to be liquid. whenever i eat it it's solid
The chocolate inside is a liquid at room temperature, it melts at a lower point than the shell.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.10.232.131 (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  liquid?
Talk:Geography of Nepal

message: Geography of Nepal
Tibet is located in the northwestern corner of nepal
there is many plants and animals there.
lol.com—––––————≈18:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have been using Google Earth etc. to find latitude/longitude of border crossings.  It isn't always possible to pinpoint the crossing points from map or satellite images, so it would be great if those who know the locations could verify and correct them.  LADave (talk) 00:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Border Crossing locations 

message: The map of Nepal is according to the newly published map of Nepal by the Government of Nepal according to international standards but not the one that is published by India. So pls review and update the map as well
Thank you Shekhar Niroula (talk) 16:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Which map of Nepal is according to the "newly published map of Nepal"? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Nepal released a new political/administrative map yesterday ( more on this https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/05/nepal-map-heightens-land-dispute-india-200520175945554.html).
I wanted to change the map of Nepal on this page to reflect the correct map. 67.83.31.36 (talk) 23:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 23:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 May 2020 

message: The discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nepal#New map and area of Nepal may be of interest to you. Thank you! Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New map and area of Nepal

message: What is actual area of Nepal? Shashi55patel (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: 147,516 150.107.107.28 (talk) 15:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area of Nepal 

message: Area of nepal is 1,47,181 sq.km Daya Bandhu Ghimire (talk) 01:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 03:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 May 2020 

message: Please change 'Nepal depends on India for goods ...' to 'Nepal buys goods... mostly from India' because Nepal is not dependent to India instead she pays for whatever she buys from India. But the reverse is true, most of the businessmen in Nepal-India border are dependent to Nepali buyers for their living. Janakparajuli (talk) 15:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . That's not what the article says, and making this exact change would leave it nonsensical. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 September 2020 

message: remove the nepali from the subheadings. Svenurban (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2021
Talk:Roger Rabbit (Disney)

message: Who trully owns the rights to Roger Rabbit?
:
The previos answer is completly wrong, Amblin(Speilberg) co-produced the movie with Touchstone(Disney). Warner Bros. had nothing to do with it except the lending of the looney tunes charecters. Hes right disney theme parks do sell merchandise.
So the bottom line is  Disney and Steven Speilberg own 50/50 of Roger Rabbit and realated charectors.
                        Anonimous 26 July 2006
:An excerpt from copyright.gov gives the following;
1. Registration Number: PA-368-781 
Title: Who framed Roger Rabbit? / produced by Robert Watts & Frank Marshall ; directed by Robert Zemeckis.
Description: 6 film reels : sd., col. ; 35 mm. 
Note: Based on the book Who censored Roger Rabbit? by Gary K. Wolf. 
Claimant: Touchstone Pictures, a.a.d.o. the Walt Disney Company, & acAmblin Entertainment, Inc.
Created: 1988 
Published: 20Jun88 
Registered: 23Jun88
Author on © Application: Walt Disney Pictures and Television, Amblin Entertainment, Inc., employers for hire.
Previous Related Version: Drawings of cartoon characters prev. reg. 1987, VA 272-999; literary work prev. pub.; songs also identified as preexisting material.
Claim Limit: NEW MATTER: "all other cinematographic material." 
Special Codes: 4/X/N 
RicJac 14:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rights 

message: The organization of this page is a mess.  The whole second half is a grab-bag of random trivia, half of which isn't even true (I maintained an episode guide for Tiny Toon Adventures back in the early 90's and I'm certain Roger Rabbit never appeared on the show).
There should be a factual rundown of Roger's appearances in the feature film and then the followup shorts (which aren't even mentioned in the current draft!!), along with substantial appearances in other media, like the comic books.  The background story of the aborted sequel also needs a citation.
That said, the stuff about the book is good (not many people have acually read Who Censored Roger Rabbit), though it's hard to keep the movie and book story-lines straight in the current write.  Maybe they should have separate sections. Invalidname 02:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization
Talk:Tor Cyan

message: What exactly was Tor's connection to Rogue? My 2000ad buying was a bit patchy around then, so all I "know" was that Tor appeard to have been re-cloned from the data on Rogue's biochip. So he would have been a clone of Rogue? Kelvingreen 15:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also, the Tor/Rogue crossover story from one of the end-of-year progs (the first one I think) hasn't been included on the list, although that may be because it's technically a Mercy Heights rather than Tor Cyan story (although it's not mentioned on theMH page either)? The story should also perhaps be added to 2000_AD_crossovers#Rogue_Trooper. Kelvingreen 10:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to Rogue 

message: * I have restored the external link to information about Tor Cyan's origin:  and  (British Comics wikia). The objection when it was deleted was a link to Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided, whose entry #12 is "Open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors.". But this information about him is important to those interested in his history: see the previous section. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *Whether the information is interesting or not is not, it still fails ELNO and so still should not be included. Since per WP:ELBURDEN disputed links are excluded by default until there is active consensus for inclusion, I have undone your edit. (Note also that citations are appropriately placed before external links per MOS:LAYOUT). Suggest if the origin story is of interest, reliable sources should be found to describe it in more detail in the article. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about Tor Cyan's origin
Talk:Cheeseburger in Paradise

message: Please don't delete this page
:I just cleaned it up a bit; it should constitue as 'notable' now.--69.145.122.209 01:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Delete this Page

message: I changed the format from "digital download" to "7" single" because that is how substantially every single was released in 1978. Even if the song is now available as a digital download, that wouldn't bear on how it was originally released. --Metropolitan90 05:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just copied/pasted the Wake Me Up When September Ends box, so I may have left it there by accident. --69.145.123.171 18:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: can't believe I'm the only one who for the past 40 years (right up to today) thought he sang " French-fried cicadas" 2600:1700:F90:BF60:C59F:5F83:C57F:81C (talk) 18:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  misheard lyrics
Talk:Drogheda United F.C.

message: I think some of the player links are to different people with similar names- some funny ones there!
:More then likely, i'll go threw see what i can work out. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 05:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All but one was incorrect. Anoter was listed on the disam, but no article was wrtten for him, and i am not sure if it him or not, havn't been following the club well. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 06:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed ref to King John's coat of arms. King John's coat of arms do not contain a star and crescent. 
Mothra (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emblem 

message: President Mary McAleese said "Crescent and Star" came from the Turkish flag when she was in Turkey. The Ottoman Empire helped Ireland in 1847. Böri (talk) 10:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crescent and Star 