Talk:USL W-League (1995–2015)

message: The Mile High Edge link should go somewhere besides back to this page (under redundant, see redundant) --Paploo (talk) 03:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi US women's football followers,
The new Australian women's league has just been announced and it is also called the W-League.  I have called the new article W-League (Australia).  What should happen with the article names?
Suggestions:
*W-League / W-League (Australia)
*W-League (United States) / W-League (Australia)
*USL W-League / W-League (Australia)
*USL W-League / Australian W-League
*USL W-League / W-League (not implying the Aus one has "priority" - just that if the US one is known as the USL W-League there is no disambiguation needed)
Comments?
-- Chuq (talk) 02:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think for right now we should stick with W-League/W-League (Australia).  Right now there are more pages for the American W-League (and eventually I'll have more for past seasons), so I think the current configuration would require the least amount of change.  This is a pretty bare-bones staff working on the W-League (primarily myself and JonBroxton), so at least I'd rather keep it as is for now.  If it's decided to change this, I don't have any qualms with the decision, it might just take a little bit to get all of the pages and templates changed depending on other circumstances. Mtndrums (talk) 03:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Not sure if I am going blind but wasn't there previously an italicised disambiguation sentence at the top of this article eg. 'This is about the North American League for the Australian League see W-League (Australia)' ?  If there was any reason why this was removed?  If not, any problems if I add such a sentence? --TinTin (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: ====Midwest Division====
*Buffalo Flash  (2009-)
*Chicago Red Eleven  (2009-, Chicago Gaels 2005-08, Chicago Cobras 1996-2004)
*Cleveland Internationals Women  (2004-)
*Kalamazoo Outrage  (2008-)
*West Michigan Firewomen  (2004-) this team is not on the official list.
*London Gryphons This is what shows up on the W-league website . Should I change it?  --Ceezmad (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midwest Division 

message: *Buffalo Flash  (2009-)
*Chicago Red Eleven  (2009-, Chicago Gaels 2005-08, Chicago Cobras 1996-2004)
*Cleveland Internationals Women  (2004-)
*Kalamazoo Outrage  (2008-)
*West Michigan Firewomen  (2004-) this team is not on the official list.
*London Gryphons This is what shows up on the W-league website . Should I change it?  --Ceezmad (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Midwest Division

message: Someone recently tried to sort all the teams by region, then by state. I reverted this since the regions used were never represented as such in the W-League conference alignments, but it got me thinking if there might be a better was to list all historical W-League teams in some way better than the alphabetical list shown.  Would people be opposed to replacing the alphabetical list (or at least putting it under a hide/show box) in favor of a timeline like this or similar? CyMoahk2 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team sorting 

message: Since the United Soccer League announced the creation of a new version of the USL W-League on 6/9/2021, I propose that this article be renamed "USL W-League (1995-2015)" and a new article be created  for the new version.
GrouchoPython (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically, the new league is called "USL W League" (no dash), so we could just leave this article where it is and create a new article under that title. I definitely agree we need a new article though -- this article seems very confusing right now trying to cover both the old league and the new one. --IagoQnsi () 19:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

text: I've gone ahead and created a new article: USL W League --IagoQnsi () 19:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New USL W-League 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. I've kept the standard page-move redirect for now; feel free to retarget it toward USL W League once the Special:WhatLinksHere/USL W-Leagueincoming links are resolved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: USL W-League →  – New league formed at USL W League, so this page needs disambiguating since one has a dash and the other doesn't. Since the other league is active, it will probably hold Primary status. Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Disambiguation needed for these. What's best? RedPatch (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment New league should not be renamed with the dash. It should remain where it is. The league is referring to it as W League with no dash. The old league specifically used the dash. W-League with dash could perhaps be a redirect, but not the main page title.  RedPatch (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 December 2021