lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Hawaiian Hotel

message: The frst paragraph in the history section has numerous inaccuracies including the relationship between the purchase of the Moana Hotel by the Matson Navigation Co. and the subsequent building of the Royal Hawaiian.  The Matson Navigation Co. did not even acquire the Moana Hotel until 1932 which was 5 years after the Royal Hawaiian opened.  There is also a suggestion that William Matson was directly responsible for the Royal Hawaiian which is gross exageration of his role since he died in 1917.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanapapiki (talk • contribs) 21:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Probably useless to try to rewrite this thing and battle the hotel's PR staff. So bad that the cost of building the hotel is cited twice, and changes. Came here because of Mad Men. When they wanted to set a scene in the sixties, they set it here. Not a good sign. This area was less fashionable by the Eighties, and heavily aimed at Japanese tourists.  Profhum (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an ad or an article?  

message: The article states that Abigail Kawananakoa, "would have been Queen of the Kingdom of Hawaii had the monarchy survived." That's not strictly true. While Abigail Kawananakoa certainly would have been a candidate for the throne, the fact that Liliʻuokalani died without issue, and that she did not (or rather, could not, as it was no longer possible to fulfill the constitutional requirements) select a new heir designate after her original heir designate, Victoria Kaʻiulani, died in 1899, means that, under Article 22 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi, no one had a legitimate pretense to the Hawaiian throne, and it would have been necessary that the Legislature of the Kingdom of Hawaii elect a new Sovereign from among the aliʻi had the Kingdom survived (or were the Kingdom restored) after 1917. Consequently, I'm removing that statement.—MNTRT2009 (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abigail Kawananakoa
Talk:Reliability engineering

message: I just came across Reliability verification in the New Pages Queue. As it deals with a subtopic of this article, editors watching this page may be interested in contributing. signed, Rosguill talk 20:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related article created 

message: wide overlap and redundancy fgnievinski (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Reliability verification]] into [[Reliability engineering]]
Talk:Pan-Arabism

message: In fact Arsuzi stated that he did not see in Aflaq's young movement more than "un mouvement droite soutenu par l'Allemagne nazie et ainsi incompatible avec les idéaux du nationalisme arabe". Aflaq's answer was, that in spite of his stance, regarding the enemy's enemy as a friend, there was no need to copy an ideologie whatsoever. You may reed this in Guingamp's book Hafes el Assad et le parti Baath en Syrie Paris 1996, p. 44). ----130.83.12.163 (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aflaq impacted by Arsuzi who was fascinated with the Nazi ideology of "racial purity"? 

message: Some have argued that the Arab Spring has triggered a revival of Arab nationalism and Pan-Arabism, as there has been solidarity between the revolutionary movements in all the Arab states and the role of Arab nationalists in the revolutions. Charles Essie (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As a personal opinion, what is notable with the Arab Spring is that the fact that people across the Arab World share the same language enabled online communities/social networks to flourish in a way not possible in the pre-www era. It is not a revival of the very rigid and militaristic pan-Arabism of the Cold War but rather evolution of a new trend of civic nationalism (that, unlike the earler pan-Arab trend, do not deny national or regional particularities of each state). --Soman (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but I would describe this as a new kind of Pan-Arabism, based in revolutionary solidarity between the people of the Arab world in their common struggle for freedom and self-determination. Charles Essie (talk) 01:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

text: what's the motivation of pan arabism, beyond those who just seek unity or 'strength in .? there r milliins of people, who might favor it for different reasons, some few even nefarious, which would persist and possibly fester in a realized version of it. 12.146.12.12 (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 'numbers' 12.146.12.12 (talk) 05:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

text: One thing is sure though. Pan-Arabism is not nearly as dead as this article portrays it to be. We here less about it, sure. But they're are still many groups out there that continue to espouse it. Yes, these days it's mainly Islamists, but as you've said, they tend to be pan-Arabist and pan-Islamist. Pan-Islamism is pretty much an extension of Pan-Arabism anyway (just like how Turanism is an extension of Pan-Turkism). So at the very least, this article should recognize more recent trends, such as the fusion of Islamism and Pan-Arabism promoted by groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. Charles Essie (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Revival

message: the image shown on this page associated to pan Arabic flag is wrong. The flag is of Palestine, and not pan Arabic. Pan arabic flag is black, green and white (from the top) with a red triangle on the left hand side Donnaherb (talk) 23:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong pan Arabic flag used
Talk:Clara Dickson Hall

message: I've worked for Cornell campus life, and that building houses 450 students, maybe 455.  1000 is just plain wrong.
I have located at least three halls at UMich which are substantially larger (1000+), and I believe at least the other Big 10 schools will have dorms of comparable size.   Also, Bancroft Hall at USNA evidently houses approximately 4000 students, so this hall is nowhere near the largest.  Fsiler 09:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article probably merits deletion; in light of a suggestion on the deletion precedents page, I am changing this to a redirect to Cornell.  If it is the largest dorm on campus or holds some other distinction, it can be mentioned there. Fsiler 11:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Virgil's tomb

message: Some parts of this article appear to be copied and pasted from . (NB: I'm neither the original author nor the poster of the article's text here.)--Finbarr Saunders 20:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: *

message: I added a personal photo of the site in question before I read the copyright notice above. I modified the lead a bit, but not much. It confused this tunnel with another nearby one and called "Campania" a town. It is a region.Jeffmatt 08:31, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: photo

message: The article says that Virgil wanted his ashes to be transported back to his villa - but later on talks about his bones. Was he cremated or just buried? The only theories I could come up with was that it was meant he wanted to be cremated but wasn't, or that his cremation was botched and he was only partly cremated (e.g. Hitler), or that the author just used the word "bones" as a synonym for remains. -Noha307 (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remains 
Talk:Front velocity

message: I believe this is the same as group velocity.  Should we redirect? -- Pgabolde 20:25, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think this is usually called the signal velocity. It's not quite the same thing as the group velocity, in the cases where v_g > c. -- DrBob 17:59, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Revolutionary Vol. 2

message: The "song descriptions" on this page are poorly written and fail to capture the overall point of the songs. Someone should re-write.
I think I spy quite a few weasel words in the opening paragraph, as well. 68.195.47.239 20:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Collis P. Huntington High School

message: I suspect that both Ridley and Palmer should get their own articles sooner or later.  I think it's in the nature of the newness of Wikipedia that we don't yet have any articles on these two.  It's possible that Lu's father, Lutrelle Senior, who did a lot after leaving Huntington High in 1943, would also merit an article.  The bit about Thad probably needs a home too, in an article about the history of Hampton Roads athletics.  Yep, I think I'm getting the black history bug. --Tony SidawayTalk 20:28, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Walter Ridley and Lu Palmer

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Service economy

message: I would like to see a serious discussion of service economy.
Service economy seems to me a mere ideology in a society who has no sense
of purpose. And I don't see apologist of service enonomy caring much
about environment as the article does.
Half-baked thoughts
The fact: Less and less people are working in production
of physical products. Is this a reason for arbitrarily ranging
everything else in services.
Marketting is taking a huge place. It was a win-win
when it created a mass-market lowering cost for useful
products. It is now a loose-loose proposition where
huge amout of money are used to pit a carbohydrated
drink against one another.
What are the services?
Who benefit from these services?
Many of these services don't benefit "normal" people but managers
of the services enconomy (flight, restaurant, hotels, conferences)
Is this high overhead system desirable when we realize that we
live in a world of finite physical ressources?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.67.232.89 (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 3rd paragraph, 1st line: "[...]Although it still manufactures computers[...]". IBM don't manufacture computers anymore (Lenovo bought that part), but still develop software, financial services, etc.
I didn't dare change the paragraph, if someone feels more comfortable with it, if they think it is appropriate, go ahead.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sevvem (talk • contribs) 15:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment on IBM 

message: I second this point, really environmental costs have (if anything) greatly increased by the shift from industrial to service based economies, since 
A) manufacturing is now done in countries with few or no environmental restrictions
B) manufactured goods tend to be of lesser quality, and/or without parts availability and therefore must be replaced instead of repaired
C) manufactured goods are now shipped across the world (usually twice, see below), instead of distributed locally
Continuing this theme of 'environmental offshoring', many recyclers now ship their electronic waste back for recycling (typically burning and recycling of component metals) since it's far cheaper than recycling it in a country with strict environmental laws.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.222.119.22 (talk) 20:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment on environmentalism 

message: The length of this section relative to the length of the article is ludicrous. Ben Finn (talk) 16:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Environmental effects of the service economy

message: Who is he and why is he quoted?  If he is a native English speaker why does he say so incoherently "When GDP [singular] are [plural] low"?  What is the point in such an anodyne statement?  Should it not be deleted from the article?  Deipnosophista (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: James Murrdock
Talk:Moccasin (disambiguation)

message: This page started out simply enough, as definition for a shoe.  The Brittanica addition made it into some kind of weird definition list, and the disambig shouldn't even really be here since this page doesn't go to any specific moccasin pages for most of the definitions with the exception of lady's slipper and water moccasin.  A little bit of house cleaning would be nice.  Syrae Faileas - «Talk» 20:43, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Issues
Talk:Protocol (computing)

message: Please comment at Talk:Communications protocol#Confusingly similar articles.
The TCP/IP layer names are not a subset of the OSI layer names...--69.133.205.118 22:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The article currently claims that
"The OSI model is not the only reference model however."
What other reference model?
I wish the article said
The other reference model is called "".
-- but of course, filled in with the actual name of that other reference model(s).
(The article mentions a "The Internet model".
But it links those words to
the Internet protocol suite,
which, as far as I can tell, is not a reference model for protocols,
but a collection of actual protocols.)
--65.70.89.241 13:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the other reference model 

message: There is no difference between a Protocol (Computing) and a Communications Protocol.  The fields of computing and communications overlap in the area of protocols; computers need protocols to communicate and communications network need computing (hardware
and/or software) to carry out the procedure for communicating.  You could say that this wasn't the case when mechanical switches were in use for telephony,
but if a slide rule can be called a computer then so can a mechanical switch.  Ngriffeth 11:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine with Communications Protocols 

message: It gave me an idea of what a computing protocol is. I have long wondered what all those acronyms meant. Now I have an idea. Thanks, fellow editors you made my day.1archie99 (talk) 22:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a very good article because 

message: Under "Importance" there's a link to a non-existent article with the text "barney videos", is this a "computing term" or did that purple dinosaur really play a role in the importance of computer protocols?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.231.35.195 (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barney videos?
Talk:Elektra v. Santangelo

message: It would be nice to make this more NPOV, but there's not much information to present on the RIAA's side yet.  (see this Aug-05 interview and the reference to "junior attorneys").  --Interiot 20:55, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What, we don't consider "MPAA and RIAA are evil bastards" NPOV? *g* — ceejayoz ★ 00:38, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Found a good presentation of the RIAA's point of view on this case in a CNN American Morning interview -- added some links and excerpts.  Tried to be as fair as I could (all the excerpts are consistent with their contexts) but I'm kind of new at this:  possibly the summary paragraph might be construed as too POV? In other words:  maybe I'm just biased, but I can't figure out how to summarize the RIAA's position without making them look at least a little bit like the Spanish Inquisition ... maybe someone else can improve-or-remove the summary.  -- dvgrn 13:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: I suppose we're taking a bit of a risk creating this story before the lawsuit is over.  If the parties end up settling, or the defendant loses, it will be a relative non-event, and it wouldn't surprise me if it was VfD or merged into a larger article.
:Even if the defendant loses (possibly even "especially"?) it seems likely that this will set an important legal precedent.  Given the amount of media coverage, even an out-of-court settlement is probably encyclopedic at this point (?) -- dvgrn 13:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's risky - this is the first case in the RIAA's litany of infringement suits where the defendant is opting to defend herself rather than settle, so whatever the result it will be significant. Mind you, given the result of Priority Records v. Chan I'm betting that this one is ultimately likely to be dismissed on similar grounds (i.e. on the basis that you can't sue a parent for the alleged infringing activity of their child), rather than the defendant being found not guilty, which would be a much more significant result. -- Hux 09:40, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD/Merge
Talk:Gerard J. Foschini

message: I couldn't find out his date of birth, or his parents' names. I'd also like to be able to quote some accurate figure for his number of publications, but the IEEEXplore author search only turns up about 370 — surely it's more than that? -Splash 21:02, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Constructed languages/List Of Conlang-Related Articles

message: I suggest organizing the list into:
*articles about types of conlang
*articles about specicic conlangs
*articles about conlangers
*articles about the conlang subculture
--Jim Henry | Talk 21:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --IJzeren Jan 08:12, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Added Tsolyáni to the language-article list and its category, role-playing languages to the category list. There sure isn't much about good old table-top RPGs at wikipedia...
:Thanks! :) 
Anyway, I don't think Yola is  a conlang. --Kaleissin 18:44:36, 2005-09-05 (UTC)
:Yes, you're absolutely right! It was on my watchlist for another reason. I'll remove it from the list... --IJzeren Jan 20:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some minute updates...
Talk:Volksverhetzung

message: *answers.com entry, reworded and expanded
This might be helpful to expand the article, I'm too lazy:
*The law's German wording, non authoritative source
*unhchr translation, use ctrl+F to find "Incitement of the people"
--Tickle me 21:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What changes do you suggest for the article? --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh! I get the message. this discussion is about if the article needs improving. I understand it now, It doesn't need any changed, mrthinky may 18 2010 5:40pm cnt Mrthinky (talk) 22:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

text: The concept draws criticism by press and legal scholars [...] allowing in theory to punish nearly any political statment made and violating the freedom of speech.
references an article published in March 1960 that is hardly relevant any more. In the current form it implies widespread criticism of the law, which is evidently not the case. 
--141.70.99.109 (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: I think this section should be deleted. I could not find the word Volksverhetzung in any of the Karlsbader Beschlüsse. Also, the Prussian Strafgesetzbuch from 1851 (http://koeblergerhard.de/Fontes/StrafgesetzbuchPreussen1851.pdf) does not use the term (it has 87:Öffentliche Aufforderung zu gesetzlichem Ungehorsam and 93:Störung der öffentlichen Ordnung). The Reichsstrafgesetzbuch of 1871 does have §130, but does not give it a title (http://lexetius.com/StGB/130,11).--Loewis (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Of the full paragraph is missing - shall it be added. --105.12.4.96 (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: An action against non-Germans would be punishable under this paragraph, while, if the same action would be directed against Germans, it won't be punishable by a Court. --197.169.237.245 (talk) 09:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No. --Yhdwww (talk) 12:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  privileging non-Germans
Template talk:Otheruses3

message: Please, add sl:Predloga:Drugipomeni3. Thanks. --Eleassar my talk 13:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki

message: I've nominated the Otheruses templates for discussion on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion. --JB Adder | Talk 14:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD notice 

message: I would like to be able to make the link, and the text of the link be different (for example if I link to a specific chapter, for example the link in: Head of Household).
So I would like a 3rd parameter in the template, which (if it exists) would be the text of the link. Thanks. Ariel. (talk) 18:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Made a minor fix to the example mentioned, should look a touch cleaner, now. Since this is a disambig link, I think it's probably best if the text shown is the link itself in most (if not all) circumstances; my own feeling there isn't really changed by section links, but I'm open to other ideas. It's possible to work around this without changing the template, if there's some particular problem cases. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think that the full title of the target page should be shown, including section links if necessary. If a consensus is found to change the template, re-add the  template and I or another admin will make the change. Happy‑melon 21:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional parameter request 

message: This template is identical to  except that the parameter is required, why not just redirect it to . There are so many otherusesN templates already. — sligocki (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the code, you'll see that this template already uses . I don't see an advantage in using  instead. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Template:otheruses]] 

message: Because this template is admin blocked, can you add  at the top of the page?100110100 (talk) 10:35, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filing To Complete Protocol
Talk:Phase shifting

message: Please site source for crediting Francis Grasso with phase shifting.  All the research I have done does not show this.  Mr. Grasso was the first DJ to take 2 copies of the same record and extend the song past its normal 2 & 1/2 minute length, but that's all.
:: I've rephrased the passage referred to by anon above, as the technique is generic, and has been used experimentally by DJs for decades.
:: My biggest concern about this article is that it appears to be describing two entirely different things - "repeating phrases of the same tempo, but different metrical lengths" is not really related to the audio effect, which depends on two identical sounds playing at subtlely different speeds. TheMadBaron 07:23, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've deleted what I consider to be irrelevant sections. The audio effect is covered in Phasing. TheMadBaron 07:31, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

message: *Francis Grasso is credited with originating phasing as a DJ technique, playing two copies of the same record from the same point at the same time so as to create a phase effect.
I'll leave this out for now since I don't know if it is phasing or phase shifting. Hyacinth 11:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to http://suenomartino.net/btg.htm it was phase shifting, giving a flanging effect. Hyacinth 11:14, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Grasso
Talk:Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa

message: The original article under this title read, in full:
Baron Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa (1818-1899), generally known as von der Lasa, was a leading Prussian chess master.
He travelled widely, and collected about all known chess books at the time to his chess library.
I consider that article a stub, although not so labeled, and have treated it accordingly.J S Ayer 21:21, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: It says that he retired from diplomacy in 1864, but he was actually appointed an official envoy of Prussia to Denmark right after the Second Schleswig War. This brought him to Copenhagen, where he was an active part of starting the Copenhagen Chess Club of 1865. There are several Danish and German sources of this, e.g. Letter from Bismarck to v. Heydebrand und der Lasa, Prussian envoy in Copenhagen. Feynman (talk) 08:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diplomacy
Talk:Mocha, Yemen

message: Created as part of the WikiProject Missing articles Paul 21:31, 1 September 2005 (UTC)