lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:IMSA GT Championship

message: Who is "Bishop"? Can this be clarified with an introduction earlier in the article?
Rwintle (talk) 18:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I've just discovered a small group of articles about IMSA GT classes. What they all have in common is their questionable quality. Many of these are unsourced, especially the list of cars itself. Some have dubious sources (Car Throttle). Some are a progression from one class into another (GTS was formerly GTO as also was GTX). For them to stand out as their article, they all will need a lot of work. SpacedFarmer (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support per nomination after coming here via New Page Review. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

text: * Comment. All listed classes IMHO appear to be independently notable: it is relatively easy to find independent reliable sources on who pushed for them and why, why some of them did not work out, what were the technical requirements. So the merge decision hinges on the secondary factors: maintenance convenience, avoiding duplication, potential for editor  to develop the stubs, etc. --Викидим (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision to merge
Talk:Zheng Keshuang

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=sEYPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA235#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ducal title 

message: http://irows.ucr.edu/papers/irows72/irows72.htm
Rajmaan (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zheng's Generals project to invade the Philippines
Talk:Zlatko Sudac

message: Is the internal link to Sudac Air Service in any way related to the subject of the article, the priest?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.186.229 (talk) 18:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal link 

message: This article needs some cleanup and editing. It is full of poorly written, unsubstantiated speculation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.160.253 (talk) 20:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs cleanup
Talk:Havemeyer Hall

message: I don't recall any scenes from the first Spiderman movie being filmed in or near Havemeyer.  There were some scenes filmed in front of Low Library, but the indoor lab scenes were clearly shot on a soundstage somewhere.  Aside from the Low Library rotunda, the main reading room in Butler Library, the Levien Gym and the Uris Pool, no room at Columbia has ceilings that high.  Besides, it was portrayed as a biology lab, not a chem lab.
Some scenes from Ghostbusters were filmed in Havemeyer and at least one establishing shot showed the building's exterior, albeit with a made-up name.  But the article says there were scenes filmed in room 309, and that's not correct.  The interior scenes (the ones in which Bill Murray gives two undergrads an ESP test) were filmed in a utility room on the first or second floor.
:Then feel free to change it. --† Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many Columbia buildings have geo tags. Would someone who knows the best way to incorporate that into this article please tag Havemeyer with 
Location: +40° 48' 33.61", -73° 57' 44.02"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.59.74.3 (talk) 23:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: I have updated the external link to the ACS National Historic Chemical Landmarks program and added a wiki link to Harold Urey. I am the program coordinator of the ACS-NHCL program.KLindblom (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Link
Talk:Zoran Janković (politician)

message: Is "economist" really the most appropriate designation for Janković. Isn't "Manager" much better, since is that what he is? Viator slovenicus 09:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well now he's president-elect of Slovenia and has been mayor of Ljubljana for the past 5 years, so maybe (manager) isn't the right term, either... --Ioscius ∞ 20:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, I agree. I'm thinking of moving the article simply to Zoran Janković, as he is the most notable of all of them. --Eleassar my talk 21:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the article 

message: "Nevertheless, Ljubljana's mayor enjoys considerable electoral support, principally from the large Serbian minority in Ljubljana, due to his own Serb heritage"
The citation for this claim is from a German news article. Is this a reliable source? Did anyone care to check it? There is also a problem with it. The Serbian minority in Ljubljana couldn't vote for him, even if they could, since they're not Slovenes and only Slovene citizens have voting rights. Maybe it should say he has support from Slovenes with Serbian heritage?
In any case, the statement is unwarranted, adds no information to the article, was probably written by some bitter Slovene who hates Serbians in Ljubljana (as many do) and should be removed.
If nothing else, I'll remove the citation and add a 'citation needed' tag. Because if you agree with nothing that I said, you should at least agree that a German news article from Die Presse is not a valid and reliable source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.58.58.201 (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large Serbian minority
Talk:Burger King chicken nuggets

message: These were always "chicken tenders" until a few years ago, and they tasted completely different.  I don't like how this article refers to them as always being chicken nuggets when that's a relatively new product that is fairly distinct.  The article should at least refer to the older years' product (when it was shaped like crowns, for example) by the name of "chicken tenders."  -KaJunl (talk) 22:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I was referring to the "history" section.  The other sections seem inconsistent in the naming- I'm guessing this is the old "chicken tenders" article.  -KaJunl (talk) 22:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  tenders vs. nuggets 
Talk:Golan Armored Vehicle

message: Hey there, Im pretty sure that "When equipped with reactive armor, the vehicle is the only MRAP vehicle able to defeat Explosively Formed Penetrators, the deadliest type of IED." is incorrect. For an example see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceradyne_Bull. These two articles are contradictory.
81.158.31.66 (talk) 01:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rafael Overhead Weapon Station

message: According to the info provided at Rafael company website, info in this article is incorrect because the author of this article has confused the data of Samson Family remotely operated weapon station (ROWS) with OWS ROWS, both manufactured by Rafael, and both share the common base, the naval ROWS Typhoon, also developed by Rafael a little earlier.
OWS series ROWS is the larger one, weighing between 1 to 1.1 ton depending on the configuration, and it is similar to the standard Typhoon naval ROWS, while Samson family ROWS varies in weight with much greater range, depending on the configuration.
Samson Jr. ROWS is for 5.56 mm and 7.62 mm machine guns, weighing 60 - 75 kg, while Mini Samson ROWS can accommodate weaponry up to 12.7 mm calibre, as well as 40 mm grenade launcher, and Mini Samson ROWS weighs 140 - 160 kg, similar to that of Mini Typhoon naval ROWS.  The last member of the Samson family, the standard Samson, can accommodate cannons ranging from 20 mm - 40 mm, weighing 1.5 ton, similar to that of standard Typhoon naval ROWS and OWS.
The mistake in this article should be corrected, and perhaps it should be split into two, one for OWS ROWS, another for Samson ROWS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.170.136.201 (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info in the article is wrong
Talk:Zvezdana Popović

message: i am looking for zvezdana popovic. please forward this e-mail to her or send me communucation data. thanks/ amiram borowitsh  conteco@zahav.net.il  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.95.157.156 (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:HD Radio

message: While the replaced image is definitely useful for all the pages that are already linked to it, I prefer the previous text-template version. It's more true to the original logo.
Unless there's an objection, I think it's best we revert to the template version. For articles that want the image, they can keep it linked that way. JPG-GR 03:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template vs. Image

message: The broadcast industry is so goofed up.  KRXO-FM has two HD Radio streams (besides the primary), one that carries a Classic Rock format (branded as "104.5 KRXO" which used to be their main analog signal back in the stone age before 2012 or so) and another that carries "Exitos 96.5" a Spanish Oldies format stream.  So how do you list the two for article purposes?  They don't brand them as "KRXO-FM HD2 Classic Rock", but instead use the translator frequency (likewise for the Spanish station).  License-wise, in all cases, not just this station, the analog translator carries the HD stream not the other way around.  So do you title the article under "Kxxx ###.# HD2" or "K###xx ###.#"?  Because that sort of determines how the template gets used.  *sigh* --plaws (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The damn translators ... 

message: Hi,
I'm proposing to change  to bring it in line with MOS:SMALLFONT. In 2016,  moved to remove the  around the template text but was overruled by . However, since this template is almost exclusively transcluded in infoboxes where the text is a point size smaller than the article body, the small font is deprecated and should be removed. (The recent edit request for  was done for the same reason.) I'm opening this in order to gather consensus/awareness and because it was previously contested in 2016.
At  I have made a proposed edit to show what the change would look like. The "also on" is removed at 's suggestion which compensates for the larger point size in terms of the width of the text in an infobox transclusion. Thus, a typical entry would look like "105.1 MHz (HD Radio)".
I look forward to hearing what members of the community have to say. Raymie (t • c) 18:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edit 2 January 2020
Talk:Fullo

message: Plenty of relevant details, and well-written (no typos and solid language); fairly well-organized.
"Fullones also left containers on street corners that Romans filled with urine" seems a bit of a digression. You might make this flow a little better.
It still works well as it is now, but a couple of organizing titles would definitely not go amiss. It would hold everything together even better.
The link for Fuller's Earth does not work - I'm not sure why this is, since searching this does bring up the right website. If you can't get it to work, I guess you can just take it out.
Or see if the following format works instead:
"Fuller's Earth" in place of Fuller's Earth (assuming the latter is what you've used).
Finally, I'd also suggest putting the archaeological evidence at the beginning rather than the end.
Great work, though!
199.74.100.151 03:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:LIV (SO) Serval

message: I've moved some information here from Wolf armoured vehicle, much of it seemingly sourced to . Cheers, TewfikTalk 00:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflictong statistics 

message: I have moved the page from AGF (vehicle) to LIV (SO) Serval. All the sources I could find for this vehicle uses the name LIV (SO) when referring to it, while AGF is rarely used. 
Jane's, probably one of the most reliable sources when it comes to military equipment, uses LIV (SO) Serval as well. Since both the name "LIV (SO)" and "Serval" seem to be the names most used for the vehicle (both in combination an individually), I've renamed the page accordingly. Chamal T•C 07:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming page
Talk:City guard

message: A merger with Watchman (law enforcement) was suggested. I currently abstain on this, but would like to raise one important question: city guard is about municipal law enforcement. Are watchman municipal as well? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not seeing enough proof that the subject is the same, or not notable. If somebody wants to merge it, AfD the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: AfDs are never required for a merge, in fact, you aren't supposed to do AfD's to get a merge done, that's what talk pages are for. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 19:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is consensus for the merge, yes. If there isn't, a discussion is needed, which often escalates to an AfD. Since this talk page has next to zero visibility, I think an AfD is needed if we want to keep this going (it is likely going to attract more useful comments than an RfC would). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I requested comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement. This is a much better way to get comment on this. Again, Articles for Deletion should only be used for deletion and not to propose merges. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming this WikiProject is active, sure, let's try it out. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

text: It is active, just quiet. S.G.(GH) ping! 11:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with watchman

message: * Don't merge would be my own argument. I personally view a "city guard" in it's formal usage as a term which refers to official "gate watchers" or Vigiles Urbani whereas a "watchman" could be, as someone says below, a guy wandering an industrial estate twirling a key-on-a-chain and a cup of coffee. The terms are somewhat interchangeable in casual usage - informally, both city watch/town guard/etc. and watchman are used to refer to both parties, but in official usage I see the "city watch" as a specific term. However both articles need a bit of a re-write because at the moment they appear to be the same thing, but that is down to article quality rather than reality. IMO. S.G.(GH) ping! 11:37, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Depend of the country, the city guard is considered a police officer.A Watcher is a private employee, if the individual is a City Guard, payed by the municipal council, is considered a policeman de facto. And, in many jurisdictions, is acepted in the International_Police_Association. So, sir, take easy.
Bryard 23:41, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No Way
Talk:Cults: Faith, Healing and Coercion

message: *Started the article, currently sourced to (11) reputable citations.  Smee 03:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started article 
Talk:When Janet Met Jonny

message: Surely this should be merged with List of Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps episodes, rather than  Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps.  Lucas42 03:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with main article 

message: Really not satisfactory to ring-fence such a generic title for this page. If nobody has any objections, I think it should be moved to When Janet Met Jonny which is the actual on-screen title. Nick Cooper 21:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: None at all; please do. nquinnathome1 11:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: The article states
"At the end of the last routine, Janet and Jonny are photographed by Louise. Although their pose is similar to the one Janet is seen with at the start of the episode, their clothes are different, suggesting the whole thing has been a fantasy on Janet's part". 
However in the first episode Fags Shags and Kebabs, can't remember the exact line but when Donna asks Janet how she got to keep Johnny she replies, "It's amazing what a bit of male psychological manipulation can do and getting me baps out on our first date didn't hurt either" hopefully someone with the DVD's can confirm this. This suggest to me that the whole thing couldn't have been a fantasy . porterd88 14:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More a case of the writer working previously-stated "facts" into the fantasy version of Jant & Jonny's first meeting. There is an anomaly in that when Donna is "introduced" to Gaz, she recognises him from having played football with Jonny - there's no mention of him trying to get off with her in this episode. Nick Cooper 14:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Janet's Fantasy
Talk:Fish pie

message: There are a number of names for dishes of fish with a mashed potato topping:
* fisherman's pie (redirects here)
* ocean pie (redirects to an album by Shed Seven)
* admiral's pie (redirects here)
* mariner's pie (no such page)
We ought to be able to find some information on these names (and any others I may have missed) and how the definitions differ, and write something about it here.  Searches for "difference between fisherman's pie and ocean pie" and similar phrases don't seem to give any definitive answers at least in the first page of results.  Can anybody help? — Smjg (talk) 13:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fisherman's pie, ocean pie, etc.
Talk:Bernieridae

message: The family name has now been used (with only two i's) in the IOC list  Sabine's Sunbird  talk 23:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernieridae 
Talk:Shag Thomas

message: :Thomas began wrestling during a time when segregation in professional wrestling was still taking place in some territories and promotions throughout the United States. He gained prominence while wrestling in the NWA Pacific Northwest Territory for promoter Don Owen. Owen did not segregate his wrestlers...
See Jim Crow laws.  Oregon was pretty far removed from what would normally be considered a Jim Crow state (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about that).  Therefore, I fail to see how this is relevant other than to drive home the point that segregation was prevalent in the business back then. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  04:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Segregation
Template talk:Hershey's confectionery products

message: At the risk of stepping on the original template-designer's toes, I combined the "non-chocolate" and "other" categories since there seemed to be no defining characteristics dividing the two.  Both contained non-chocolate nougat-based candy bars (Zero in one, Pay Day in the other), as the primary example.
I also moved SnackBarz to "Chocolate-based" because they contain chocolate coating, and Reese's Pieces to "non-chocolate" because they're simply candy-coated peanut-butter-fudge-flavored pieces. Student Driver 03:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mill Ruins Park

message: "The tailraces from the waterpower canal are also clearly visible, and the water flow has been restored through the canal."
And "A fact from Mill Ruins Park ... Did you know? ... that the once-buried remains of a power canal ... have been unearthed" - above.
Don't know what that refers to. The Power Canal is buried its whole length. It is under the West River Parkway downstream from Portland. I suspect that visible water flow in tailrace area is storm water.
BudKey (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power Canal
Talk:Taiwanese indigenous peoples/Archive 2

message: Recent genetics research links Maori and Polynesian origins and migration paths to the indiginous people of Taiwan, which backs up the linguistic links mentioned in the article. There is a brief overview here at TVNZ, and Chambers' academic profile. Example sources:
* Whyte, A. L. H. "Human Evolution in Polynesia". Human Biology, Volume 77, Number 2, April 2005, pp. 157-177.
* Underhill, P. A. et al. "Maori origins, Y-chromosome haplotypes and implications for human history in the Pacific". Human Mutation,
Volume 17, Issue 4, pp. 271-280.
* Chu C. C. et al. "Diversity of HLA among Taiwan’s indigenous tribes and the Ivatans in the Philippines". Tissue Antigens, Volume 58, Number 1, July 2001, pp. 9-18(10).
(sorry - the anonymous IP edit was me!) Jon 00:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polynesian and Maori origins 

message: This article was nominated for GA status on November 30.  I have had to fail this article for good article status for the following reasons, based on good article criteria:
#It is well written.: Parts are well written and parts are uneven.  It is clear that this article is the work of many hard-working editors and that is part of the problem: It is uneven and clearly has flow and consistency issues.
#It is factually accurate and verifiable. Though heavily referenced, it is inconsistent as to which system you are using.  Some inline citations, and some Harvard citations are being used, and the mix of systems is a distintict problem.  See WP:CITE on how to unify these two systems.  I have some suggestions as well, see me at my talk page if you are having trouble.
#It is broad in its coverage: that it is.  No problems here.
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.: Seems good here too.
#It is stable: good here too.
#It contains images...any non-free images have a fair use rationale Big problem.  The image named: Taiwan aborigine en.jpg for example is NOT covered by Free Use, as it is clearly copyrighted, and clearly not illustrating an "object", and a free version could be created by someone fairly easily with a free map of taiwan and a graphics program.
Please fix these problems, and feel free to renominate when you do.  Good luck and happy editing!  --Jayron32 04:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA: Tips for improvement
Talk:One Missed Call 2

message: While I understand that the old plot synopsis was positively gargantuan, and that something had to be done about it, the current plot synopsis leaves... pretty much the entire movie to the imagination. Could someone please complete a clear and concise plot synopsis? 72.234.46.115 (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can do. 71.9.8.150 (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:History of Karelia

message: this is just it. also reading is painful, but reading my texts is also painful so i am not complaining Welso (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the karelian articles are so biased 

message: The Republic of Karelia#History is much more polished than this, it doesn't say much, but it does say something. Welso (talk) 20:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article should be merged or deleted entirely
Talk:Dillon Quartermaine

message: Not all of the transgressions listed in the "crimes committed" are actually crimes -- dressing as a woman or being falsely accused are not "crimes". I suggest renaming this "Brushes with Trouble" or something similar. Comolaflores 05:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually a copyvio from another site.  I went ahead and removed the entire section. --Elonka 18:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crimes

message: I recommend that the list of relationships here be whittled down to only immediate relationships and notable "within his storyline" relationships, per the guidelines at WP:SOAPS. --Elonka 23:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone put Cameron Webber as Dillon's step-nephew.  He is not related to Cameron whatsoever.MysticBlue 21:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationships