lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bitter Work

message: The episode synopsis shouldn't be a line-by-line, scene-by-scene recount of the episode.  Sure, detail is good because this is an article about the episode, after all, but keep it a summary, so there can still be something gained from watching the episode itself. --Crisu 15:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep it short

message: Where did that come from after the Mooselion incident? Toph didn't appear to have it then it just appeared from behind her back. Hammerspace? Eban 14:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm.. Yeah, because of its length and the huge rock she was sitting on, it couldn't have just been strapped to her back without it sticking out somewhere.  So I guess you're right.  But I'm not sure if it's really notable; maybe a bullet in the Notes/Trivia section.  --Crisu 15:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aang's Staff

message: If you watch "Bitter Work" on TurboNick and skip to the credits (with about 00:41 left), then you see Lu Ten spelled with a space between the 'u' and the 'T'.  I just needed to justify changing his spelling in the article. PCEevee talk 15:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lu Ten spelling 

message: I think the rule of thumb for quotes is to keep the list short.  Over-quoting a transcript of an episode could violate copyright.  Plus, the section just gets far too lengthy with some quotes having little standalone meaning (where you'd have to watch the episode to understand it).  --Crisu 05:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be going through episodes soon, probably thursday, and will be adding 5 quotes to all episodes. No more, no less. Each quote must also have some meaning to the show or help to define a character. Bitter Work has a LOT of them, and the quotes some that I dropped were hard to do so. H2P 06:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: Electrons are negatively charged, protons are positively charged, and neutrons have no charge. So please correct "Iroh said that to generate lightning one must separate positive and negative energy (probably positively and negatively charged electrons)" or at least change what he/she placed and place instead "possibly the negatively charged electrons and positively charged ions". Electrons can't have different charges.Slartibartfast1992 04:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positively and Negatively charged electrons? 

message: When Aang distracts the mooselion, I believe his dance resembles that of Timon from The Lion King, when he has to distract the pack of hyenas. Can somebody add that, because I don't know exactly how to. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.185.39.152 (talk) 01:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aang's Distraction Method 

message: Could we possibly begin more paragraphs with that word?  More variation in the writing! ComputerSherpa 08:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Meanwhile..."
Talk:Eleanor Coen

message: Eleanor was born on October 21, 1916.
If any issues arise with the copyrighting of both images - I am the owner of both paintings.
You need to cite that on the picture's page. Yanksox 00:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Berberis aquifolium

message: Why would “Oregon grape” lead to more confusion than “Oregon-grape” or “Oregongrape”? And where is the citation for this strange statement? Darorcilmir (talk) 21:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion with grapes

message: I have to agree with  in this edit summary. You going to help with this ? I would like that all to be done but someone has to do it. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for volunteering to help improve Mahonia aquifolium! I knew someone with a better knowledge of plants than I would come along eventually. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

text: * Terribly funny. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Its not a joke, you seem to be a subject matter expert. I am not, I probably couldn’t even name all the different parts of a plant cell... Look how bad my plant article creations are: Chenopodium formosanum! Not exactly the same standard as your new creations in the same space, right? Also a reminder, we are wikipedia editors not wikipedia writers. All good faith contributions to the project are welcome, it takes all kinds to build an encyclopedia and we ask each editor to contribute however much or little they wish to and we allow editors to use their time as they feel is best. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Some things about plants... sure. Not morphology or cladistics though.  Invasive Spices (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Drive by maint tag spamming
Talk:The Frogmen

message: This is in dire need of cleanup.  At the very least, we need a plot and possibly some critics reviews, both at the time of release and now.  This reads like a rant article, someone angry at the mistakes of this movie. Hbdragon88 00:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree fully, but I haven't the inclination. I did eliminate one "criticism" because it was false--UDT pre-invasion ops were done without tanks or wet suits.--Buckboard 09:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, thanks.  I think I may rent this movie later on. Hbdragon88 01:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: On the errata section, there are some mistakes (or debatable questions):
* Rebreathers would not have been used by UDT operators at anytime during WW2.: really??!! how to be sure about that? rebreathers are known since the 19th century and were commonly used by some navies during WWII (Davis apparatus in the British Royal Navy, Dräger rebreathing helmets -DM20 and DM40- in the German Kriegsmarine, 1939 Cousteau's prototypes...)
* The Frogmen did not acquire any type of SCUBA gear until after the 2nd World War: False! (but maybe those sets were only experimental and never were used in combat action...)
* The OSS Maritime Units did have Lambertsen rigs which were an early type of rebreather: yes, we saw that... but they weren't at all an early type of rebreather, in my opinion the Lambertsen breathing apparatus (patent's official name in 1944) was a modern, efficient, well developed and reliable rebreather. Anyway, the word early, applied to a 1944 rebreather, is meaningless or inaccurate, rebreathers were much older than that (1849 for the first recorded rebreather in history).
* The UDT operators relied on their ability to breath hold: may be... I don't know...
Kintaro (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errata
Talk:Helmeted guineafowl

message: Hi all, this is my first time on Wikipidia talk. I heard that some guinea fowls migrate from Africa to southern France. So to me that would mean that they would have to fly from say Morocco to Spain at least and then take it from there all the way up to France. I would be very greatfull if someone would be able to give me some facts that would give me a true or false answer.
yours greatfully
Philip
:No, they were introduced to France. jimfbleak 08:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Do guinea fowls migrate from Africa to southern France?" 

message: This page should be merged with Domesticated guineafowl, as it is about the same species. 144.214.42.129 (talk) 05:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No it should not be merged. We usually have a separate article for the domesticated type and for the wild type. I mean, we have dozens of articles for individual breeds of animals like dogs and cows, even though all those breeds are still the same species. --Hibernian (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hibernian is correct, no merge Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:R30: 30th Anniversary World Tour

message: You know, I've always wondered exactly how Jerry Stiller's presence on this Rush DVD/album came to be. Is Stiller a fan of Rush's music? Is Rush a fan of Stiller's work? Does anyone have any idea? 
Charles M. Reed 00:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jerry Stiller's R30 Appearance
Talk:16 Years of Alcohol

message: :Image:16 Years of Alcohol.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:16 Years of Alcohol.jpg
Talk:En with descender

message: If we keep “Ng (Cyrillic)” as this article's lemma, what should we use for Ҥ/ҥ (ŋ/ṅ/ng)?
Wikipeditor 00:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this disc'n page for a Dab-page will become less accessible as a result of merging the incomplete Dab Ng (Cyrillic) into the Dab pg NG, i am copying the tags & the above comment to that Dab's talk page talk:NG#Lemma problem, and suggest that comments on this matter be made there.--Jerzy•t 09:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemma problem
Talk:Mission (station)

message: First, I think this article could easily be merged with mission (Christian) and second, even though there were many negatives to missions, this article could be worded a lot better when expressing those deficiencies.  There are a number of prosperous cities around the world that began as missions. - IstvanWolf 00:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 merge proposal

message: Although any religion can have missions, this article is only about Christian missions. It should be merged with Christian mission. The page should redirect to missionary, because mission is not specific to any religion.
The only problem is that, the article does not explain the missions of all religions which is its topic, but solely Christian missions.
And then I just saw the template saying that this article is part of the Christianity project. It shouldn't be, but that is the proof that it should be merged to Christian mission.
— XComhghall (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge of Mission (station) to Christian mission, which would then allow Mission (station) free in case anyone was in the mood to create an article that also covered missions from other religions. Klbrain (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 2021 merge proposal
Talk:St John's Cathedral (Brisbane)

message: The sentence "Some other stone, which had been quarried for the abandoned project to build the Holy Name Cathedral was also purchased" has been flagged as "citation needed". After a fairly diligent search, I failed to find anything online but the time period this re-use would have occurred in would be after the end of the out-of-copyright newspapers (1954) and before the advent of the WWW, so not a great period for finding online citations. But I removed it because it is somewhat implausible. Everything written about the Holy Name Cathedral, Brisbane states that Duhig needed so much stone for this massive edifice that he intended to construct it from a manufactured stone called Benedict stone and needed so much of it that he obtained a licence to manufacture it locally. It was made from a mixture of cement and crushed Brisbane tuff (aka prophry). The early work that preceded this was the foundations which were made from Brisbane tuff (a common practice in Brisbane at that time). Unlike the third phase of St John's, the period of construction (or attempted construction) of the Holy Name Cathedral was within the time period of the online historic newspapers (1954 or earlier) and there is no mention of the use of Helidon sandstone in connection with the Holy Name Cathedral other than to point out it was using manufactured stone instead. So in the absence of any evidence that the Holy Name was going to use Helidon sandstone at all, it seems unlikely there was any left-over for use on St John's Cathedral. But, if anyone can find a reliable citation that supports the claim, please add it. Kerry (talk) 02:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-use of stone intended for Holy Name Cathedral
Talk:Antwone Fisher (film)

message: The film is not based on the book Finding Fish. The plot is original, written in 1993 and sold to Fox in 1994, and converted into the book in 2001. According to AFI:  
Category and text should be fixed. I am a Brazilian editor and my English is not that good to do this. Yanguas (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not based on a book
Talk:Any Way the Wind Blows (film)

message: Obviously uses biased terms. The plot article also gives little information. I've had no experience with this film though, so I can't really clean it up myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sonicandfffan (talk • contribs) 13:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The plot paragraph has obviously been copied from the film's press release or from the blurb on the DVD box. I agree it is very unencyclopedic. (The film actually doesn't have much of a plot, but that's another matter.) 84.198.246.199 (talk) 02:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Neutral 
Talk:Aragami (film)

message: I'm giving a notice to remove 'Japanese Horror Films' from this entry's Categories box because it's not a horror film. It's a straightforward fantasy/folktale/philosophical and dialogue-heavy film about a god of battle and a master samurai who confront each other through a few sword fights in an isolated temple. It does have dark moments, but none that justifies the 'Japanese horror' label. I'll wait for a month to see if anyone objects before I remove the category. Thanks. 0zero9nine (talk) 19:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Horror
Talk:Armaan (2003 film)

message: * The Hindu, Honey Irani interview --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Why does Screen link have no archive on the Wayback Machine. Can someone help me please? --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Screen''
Talk:Atlantis: Milo's Return

message: I apologize that I tried to insert a reference for the fact I added, but I don't know how to code a reference properly. 209.162.56.40 03:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the location of their first quest being in Newfoundland, when it is clear that they're in Norway due to the Kraken being a Norwegian legendary creature, the mention of Trondheim, a Norwegian city and a sign with "Krakens Vertshus", Vershus again being a Norwegian word for "inn".
84.48.114.212 (talk) 11:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norway, not Newfoundland 

message: There is no reference in the film stating that Milo is king, and it is probably unlikely as Kida tends to give all the important speeches to the Atlanteans, as well as taking care of the city. There is also no actual proof that they are married, only that they are in love. Kida is the Queen by birthright, but judging by the fact that the crystal presents itself with 'royal blood' in the previous film it is unlikely that Milo is a monarch of Atlantis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.67.89.61 (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. 177.104.112.118 (talk) 06:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "King" Milo Thatch
Talk:The Battle of Shaker Heights

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: As I recall, this film was not shot in Shaker Heights, it was flimed in California.  This article needs to be corrected to show that the actual filming was not local. IMDB lists Losd Angeles, Arcadia and othe southern LA communities as the location shoots. 68.252.62.180 (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not filmed in Shaker Heights

message: The plot section of this article is a complete spoiler. People looking up this movie on Wikipedia would most likely be wanting to know a summary and description of the movie before they watch to know what it's like, not to have the entire thing ruined for them.  BrickWallNomad (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Section Needs Revising 

message: This has to be the worst review I've ever read. Have any of you at wiki ever actually read this? If you have, did it make since to you? Someone seriously needs to rewrite this review or take it down.  Katpearl86 (talk) 23:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible review
Talk:Biker Boyz

message: sorry, i thought the synopsis was fine; could you tell me where i went wrong? Once again apologies
Jacky Boy
Erm, I can't remember specifically. You said Kid beat Dog, which is wrong. There was some other stuff too.
Kid and Smoke were side by side when Smoke eased off the throttle, or was just slightly ahead.  Either way, this should not be listed as Smoke decidedly being in the lead- there was a lot of lead-trading in the race.  Smoke decided to give Kid his wish, to beat Smoke, as everything up to this point was Kid's defiance of Smoke and his ways.
Duskshade  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.189.165 (talk) 02:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  apologies 

message: Which movie is better in all aspects? This or Torque? According to IMDB Biker Boyz has a rating of 4.1/10 and Torque has a rating of 3.4/10. So based on rating this movie looks the winner, but is it? Cazique (talk) 14:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realism vs. Action vs. Storyline vs. Acting vs. Rating vs. Entertainment 

message: All through the movie, it would have been nice to see Slick Will race just once, since at his funeral he was treated with the highest respects of the Black Knights. Just one race would have been cool.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.128.54 (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  If only..... 

message: Under Reception and Cult Status (cult status? Really?) it says that the opening tracking shot is "considered one of the best". That's a big statement, particularly regarding a film that's been pretty resoundingly slammed by critics. Is there a source for that quote?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miracle Five (talk • contribs) 02:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation on Controversial Comments? 

message: Maybe it's me, but much of the "Development" section reads like nothing more than trivia. I certainly don't see anyhing regarding the development of the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.183.228.143 (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development
Talk:Count of Ponthieu

message: Ponthieu was a province of France. It only nominally would ally with the Dukes of Normandy.
Dragon1 00:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Counts

message: There's a problem with these dates. Jeanne of Dammartin, it says, was born 1251, and married Ferdinand III, who died in 1252, with whom she had 5 children. I suspect her birthdate must be wrong. Jredwards 19:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are the years of their rule, not the years of their living. Jeanne Dammartin became Countess upon the death of her mother - listed as dying in 1251 (and whose start date is 1221 - 5 years after Jeanne's birth). Michael  Sanders 20:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Issue

message: Curious that the shield is so similar to that of the dukes of Burgundy! —Tamfang (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bendy
Talk:Blind Shaft

message: Li Yang invented the Crazy English method ? Is it really the same Li Yang ???????
: The link was created, along with the rest of the article, in Feb 2005.  The 'Crazy English' Li Yang was added rather later, November 2005.  They probably are two different people, so I am changing the link.  --GwydionM 17:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Li Yang 

message: The Ban in China is clearly not true, the 92 minute version was not approved, it is cut to 88 minutes for its release. The 88 minutes version is what's available on DVDs. While both 88 minute and 92 minute versions are available on video sharing sites under authorized distribution. 
http://video.baidu.com/v?ct=301989888&rn=20&pn=0&db=0&s=8&word=%C3%A4%BE%AE&ty=21&fr=ala3  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xingfenzhen (talk • contribs) 19:46, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ban in China 
Talk:Tiffany Blue

message: I couldn't find the back issue of "Print Magazine" from March/April 2004, pg. 176, which apparently gives more details.
Would there be any way to actually show a sample of Tiffany Blue on the page? I'm not sure how the Pantone system works or if the fact that the color is trademarked would prohibit its use in the article. --user.lain 00:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

message: It's green!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.36.128.25 (talk) 04:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  But.... 

message: Pantone is a print color system, so there should be no specific corresponding RGB or hexadecimal computer coded colors if the Pantone color is the accepted definition. In response to an earlier comment, I'd suggest a photograph of actual objects bearing the color officially to represent it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.61.68.140 (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color infobox and Pantone color
Talk:Bulletproof Monk

message: Shouldn't this entry be about the comic book and this entry moved to Bulletproof Monk (film)? (Emperor 04:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so because there is no mention of the comic book and because the film is more well-known than the comic book.  --GHcool 04:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The comic book is mentioned in the opening paragraph. There are obviously no other mentions of it because this entry is about the film - which is part of my point (this is hampering the development of an entry on the comic). We need to either make this into an entry on the film (see for example Tank Girl) or make this entry a disambiguation linking to both. (Emperor 16:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is no article about the Bulletproof Monk comic the same way there is about the Tank Girl comic.  --GHcool 00:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: If there were an article about the comic, a disambig link would be appropriate to add here, as the film is the more well-known result.  However, as there is (still) no article for it, the mention in the intro is sufficient for now. AnmaFinotera (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comic book

message: An entry in the MISTAKES section says, "During the fight on the rooftop, when Kar falls over the side of the building, you can see a PA dressed in his traffic gear in the middle of the intersection in the top left corner of the screen." What is a PA? 68.206.134.81 21:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely a production assistant.  --GHcool 22:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PA?

message: While adding reviews I noticed something unusual. The review from Variety magazine is interpreted by Rotten Tomatoes as a rotten or negative review. I would expect Metacritic then to interpret the same review as negative or possibly mixed, but in fact Metacritic sees it as a positive review assigning it 70 out of 100 on their scoring list. I found the discrepancy interesting  but ultimately it doesn't make a whole lot of difference, some might wonder the Variety review isn't grouped with the negative reviews, but that's about it. -- 109.78.196.233 (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good review bad review