Talk:Sivasubramaniam Raveendranath

message: All the 10 sources given are neutral and international BBC,Amnesty International,Sri Lankan newspapers,including an academic journal all are non Tamil reverting after adding the 10th one BBC.Only stating facts saying he is missing and karuna kidnapped him all independent sources Amnesty ,BBC say this.Harlowraman 05:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 100%, not even one non RS source has been used to make that comment. In Wikipedia we dont have to prove anything, simply have to stae with RS sources what others say in a neutral manner. Also this is the second time people are following you around and tagging your new creations with dispute tags. Is it misuse of new article patroling tool? We seriously have to look at that via an ANI and RFC if this continues. It is one thing to have differences of opinion about a subject but that's why we have talk pages to discuss. The comments like Karuna raped him directed at the editor also violates no personal attack. Number of violations, tool, civility and prsonal attack all in one edit, which is very unusual for the editor known for his neutrality. We need to maintain civility to be able to contribute to this project. Thanks Taprobanus 14:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see any personal attacks done by me against any editor in specific. I hope anybody can see that I said i do not wonder if this article states that Raveendranath was raped by karuna. I have specifically said this article on my edit summary. And, as everyone knows, one article can be edited by many editors. Being neutral is up to the editors who edit this article. If not, they themselves may assume that certain comments are seemed to be personal attacks to them. Please see that I have no reason here to do a personal attack on anyone. The other thing is, I do not follow any edits of anyone. It is not necessary to follow edits since you guys were listing down every single article in the Wikiproject Human Rights in Sri Lanka. When considering the content issue, though the refs alleged towards the Karuna gang, this article was directly attacking the Karuna gang. I'm not Karuna fan nor paramilitary supporter and I too feel that this was done by them. So keep in mind that exceptional cases need exceptional sources. Unless the source states that karuna gang did this, no one say what he/she thinks in an article Thanks --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 10:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK my apologies, I changed it to alleged Taprobanus 15:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. Raveen, I have did some changes to the article. While working on that I have noted that this article states [...]and he shifted there and lived with his daughter. :-D I have no idea how to re-write above sentence, so could you could you correct that? --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 16:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont know who Raveen is:( but I think we should re read the entire Fuad Asifs citation, I think it has all of it, unless I am missing something. Thansk Taprobanus 17:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: First Karuna being in the East I have added BBC citation if you want,I can added citations from SL government saying they have captured the emtire East and more.Daily mirror clearly states it that is area in colombo is one of the most highly guarded ones in Sri Lanka and even Amnesty says that it is one of the most tightly guarded areas in colombo and hence his disappearance became a major issue
.Dr. M. Malaravan did mention that the Prof complain as the Sunday times article clearly states that he wrote to Gotabhaya Rajapaksa about threats to his life and I have put only  that Dr. M. Malaravan said so .The history of the University is described briefly as is required to show that it has  a history of trouble those are not orphaned statements like the Eastern University massacare.Even CID sources said that the threat was from Karuna adding that citation from the academic NASSL.Further SAR issued an appeal to Rajapakse.Harlowraman 01:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answers to your edits Snowolf please all except 1 are non Tamil sources 

message: Per Circeus, using the friggin' :) talk page instead of edit summaries, --snowolfD4 (  talk /  @  ) 13:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Al these can easily be fixed Taprobanus 13:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tagged the article. Sarvagnya 09:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the article 

message: I think they are an important part, if jouranlsuits are at ris RSF talkas about them and when in raere cases acadmics get in trouble ATR becomes an important voice for them. Thanks 17:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Scholars at risk