lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Northern royal flycatcher

message: Page converted to a redirect to conform to IOC 14.1 (and 2023 Clements).Clements, J. F., P.C. Rasmussen, T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, A. Spencer, S. M. Billerman, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2023. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2023. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ retrieved 28 October 2023
 Craigthebirder (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 10, 2024 revision
Talk:Du'a' Kumayl

message: It might be best to remove the section Du'a. It's poorly written and can be replaced instead with a link to Wikipedia's article about supplication. Albertatiran (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Du'a
Talk:Pacific royal flycatcher

message: Page converted to a redirect to conform to IOC 14.1 (and 2023 Clements).Clements, J. F., P.C. Rasmussen, T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, A. Spencer, S. M. Billerman, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2023. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2023. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ retrieved 28 October 2023
 Craigthebirder (talk) 16:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 10, 2024 revision
Talk:Vector group

message: The article says that capital letters are used for primary windings, while small letters are used for secondary windings.
Now, as far as i know, the convention is: capital letters for high voltage side, and small letters for low voltage side. This isn't always the same as what is stated in the article.
As i am not sure, I didn't want to edit it right-away. If anyone can confirm this and edit the article accordingly, it would be great.
Sinan Taifour (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 11:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In once learned that the primary side is denoted by capital letters. And usually, the primary side is also the high voltage side. Wikispaghetti (talk) 01:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the primary and the HV side are not the same as discussed in this article. 174.118.142.187 (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The meaning of capital and small letters 

message: I’ve read in many websites the name “vector group “, yet the IEC standard 60076-1 never uses that name, but instead it uses “connection symbol”. So we should clarify this in the lead paragraph, either by changing it to something like “In electrical engineering, a vector group, officially called a connection symbol, is […]”, or we should remove the phrase “vector group” altogether. —Alej27 (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to whom this is called a vector group?
Talk:Seadrill

message: Scorpion Offshore has been tagged for lack of notability for 9 years. Rather than it be deleted, I think it should be merged and redirected here, essentially adding a sentence or 2 to the info on Scorpion Offshore alreadyin this article. Boleyn (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Endercase (talk) 02:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[Scorpion Offshore]] to here 

message: What I think should be changed: In the Seadrill page's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seadrill infobox, change the Key People section from what it is currently to:
 
Julie Johnson Robertson, Chair of the Board 
Simon Johnson, CEO
Grant Greed, CFO
Why it should be changed: The current names of the key people (except Simon Johnson) are out of date - the correct information is listed by news outlets such as Bloomberghttps://www.bloomberg.com/quote/SDRL:NO?sref=B0Y81EZP and the Financial Times https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/directors?s=SDRL:OSL.
References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seadrill
https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/SDRL:NO?sref=B0Y81EZP
https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/directors?s=SDRL:OSL
90.243.254.59 (talk) 10:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: SpencerT•C 05:06, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seadrill edit request: Key People
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sarah Jane Adventures episodes

message: *I rise in opposition to Will's request. I do not believe that deletion is proper for several reasons which I will outline:
#All relevant information pertaining to these articles HAS been sourced and are currently displayed in the articles. When I typed up the episode pages, I did so section by section. As you know, typing up new article pages is VERY time consuming. I did created a section for "Novelization" and "References." These sections were not complete at the time when I went to lunch. When I got back another user had deleted these sections. When Will saw the pages, the reference sections were already gone. So it was never intended to be the final edit, and thus it was not a "crystal" violation.
#These articles are considered "future television episodes" and are marked as such to give the reader notice that the articles or sections contain information about a scheduled upcoming television episode and it "may contain non-definitive information based on commercials, a website or interviews" and the "information may change as the date of broadcast approaches." This is consistent with EVERY Doctor Who related upcoming episode page and I followed the same  procedure with these articles. 
#Four out of five titles have been announced concerning  Series 1 of The Sarah Jane Aventures. Before anyone nominates a page for deletion, it is common courtesy that they discusss the matter on the article's discussion page first. Had Will done so, he would have known that the titles have been revealed AND novelations of three of those stories are due out in November 2007 by Penguin Books.  (Deej30 21:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Defense Satellite Communications System

message: I'm not familiar with NASA designations but it appears 7 IDSCS satellites were launched on 16 June 1966 under the program name Initial Defense Communications Satellite Program (IDCSP). There were 8 total satellites on the first launch but 1 was not IDSCS. The failed launch did nothing. 8 IDSCS for the "new" second launch, 4 IDSCS for the 3rd launch, and 8 for the last launch. Source is the NSSDC Master Catalog. Luis F. Gonzalez 21:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IDSCS

message: I think it would be great if a greater overview of the DSCS program was presented, in particular more detail about DSCS I and III, as well as mentioning the planned(?) upgrade for the Earth side reserves (Phase IV).  I already did a little research and dug up a small number of links, but lack the time to update Wikipedia...DSCS I, DSCS II, DSCS III, DSCS IV, and Factsheet: DSCS.  Another link I found has quite sparse information about the DSCS program: The Satellite Encyclopedia--Shporang (talk) 00:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Phase I thru Phase IV

message: I did a little cleanup, added a picture of IDSCS, and uprated this article to "C" (it might even merit a B, but it's a little thin for such a broad topic).
I also created Initial Defense Communications Satellite Program, which is now GA. At some point, someone might do the same for the other two series and then apply that information retroactively here.
In any event, it's impressive that an article essentially created by committee is in such decent shape. :) --Neopeius (talk) 14:09, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New rating and IDSCS
Talk:Rockwarbler

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Origma solitaria 2 - Wattamolla.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 26, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-10-26. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Western oriole

message: From MOS:LEAD "When the page title is used as the subject of the first sentence, it may appear in a slightly different form, and it may include variations, including synonyms." Primergrey (talk) 00:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Using the project page was suggested to discuss this proposed change as it would affect not just this one, but hundreds (if not thousands) of articles across the project. Nothing in WP:BIRD with regards to bolding alternate names is in conflict with MOS. Species with multiple alternate names, especially lesser used ones, would clutter the lead and be better placed in the taxonomy paragraph. As per MOS:BOLD, these alternate names (that redirect to the article) should all be bolded (not italicized) within the running text at their first occurrence. MOS does not dictate to place all of these names in the lead, nor does it recommend un-bolding them at first mention in the running text. Recommend retaining the status quo. Loopy30 (talk) 11:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Lake Anza

message: Does anyone have a picture of the lake's beach with beachgoers and lifeguards visible? I think such an image would be more representative of the area.Cholga is a SUPERSTAR¡Talk2Cholga!Sexy Contribs 22:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photoreq

message: This article meets the requirements for start class. Bruin2 (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reassessed
Talk:Subsea 7

message: Subsea7 owns and operates several vessels by itself, as well as having several vessels under chart from other companies. The crewing of the vessels is combined own crewing, with managed crewing. Many Subsea7 employees are employed through daughter companies and contracted companies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skippern (talk • contribs) 02:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owned Vessels/Charter
Talk:Norton AntiBot

message: "There has been speculation that Norton Antibot uses a significant amount of system resoures"
I own the product, and it takes up very little system resources (barely half a MB of RAM). Therefore, this sentence should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemicalrubber (talk • contribs) 02:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: AntiBot was not designed to remove threats completely. It is there to do as much as possible before a signature for the zero-day threat comes in and your traditional AV can fully disinfect it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TechOutsider (talk • contribs) 00:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Removing Threats Completely 

message: Discontinued! Wow, the end of an era; released as beta in mid 2007; discontinued early 2009. TechOutsider (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued 
Talk:Gattermann reaction

message: The Gattermann reaction is the formylation of an aromatic ring with Zn(CN)2 + HCl (or HCN + HCl + Lewis acid), which forms an imine intermediate which is hydrolyzed to an aldehyde. ChristianB 22:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which now is a redirect back to this page (all the Gattermann-like reactions together). Thanks User:Project Osprey! DMacks (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zinc cyanide variant 

message: I propose that Gattermann–Koch reaction be merged into this article. They're essentially variants of the same process created by the same chemist. Most of the foreign language wiki's have these 2 reaction on the same page. There is also, for the purists amongst you, the options of doing the merger the other way around, as based on the current references the Gattermann–Koch reaction was created first. Project Osprey (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merger, which will help unify the similarities and clarify the differences. It's the same Gattermann person, who extended/modified the original reaction he developed with Koch enough that this variant got its own name. I think :Gattermann reaction is a better location for the article, given it's a name common to both (the article is more than just the Koch-related topic). In terms of wiki precedence, both were created at essentially the same time by the same editor, so neither is the "pre-existing" article. DMacks (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion has been running for over 30 days so I've going to push ahead with the merge. Project Osprey (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal with [[Gattermann–Koch reaction]] 

message: "However, unlike the Gattermann reaction with HCN, this reaction is not applicable to phenol and phenol ether substrates." with cite to Organic Reactions. I don't have access to this item at the moment. Could someone who does add a detail explaining what the problem is? For example, is it that the phenol O is too Lewis-basic and binds the metal, or by extension that the ether is cleaved by the acidic conditions? Or a totally different problem, with the aromatic ring being too electron-rich? Or...? DMacks (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have access either. I can see how phenol might react to give phenyl formate but I doubt that catalyst coordination is a problem... If the Org Syn prep is anything to go by you use a full molar equivalent of catalyst to do this. No idea why aryl ethers are a problem though. Project Osprey (talk) 14:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not phenol/phenol-ethers? 

message: It is the reaction of benzene dizonium salt with Copper powder and HCl  and HBr to form Chlorobenzene and Bromobenzene respectively. 27.63.19.147 (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a reaction sometimes called by this name, yes. It is linked in the hatnote at the top. DMacks (talk) 04:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gatterman Reaction
Talk:Lake Placid, Queensland

message: Could we get a local or two to confirm if Lake Placid is indeed a suburb of Cairns?
I can't find it on Google Maps, it's not on the Cairns Regional council website (http://www.cairns.qld.gov.au)...
Council website says there's a road and a park by that name, but both are in the suburb of Caravonica. Here's their "L" suburb document for reference: http://www.cairns.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/11845/LSuburbs.pdf
Thanks.
Tristanlbailey (talk) 08:53, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Suburb?
Talk:List of Isma'ili imams

message: so Jafar Al-Sadiq is the 6th Imam and his son Ismail is the 6th too?? Mussav (talk) 03:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the Sixth Imam

message: Is there a reason "Imam" is capitalised?  Shouldn't it be lowercase, like "List of kings of France"? MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, yes. СЛУЖБА (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it not be "imam" in lowercase? 

message: Can someone clarify the table posted on this page?  Some column headers or a legend explaining the cryptic markings (^, -M-, -A-, <CHALI-, etc) would be very helpful. Kbittner (talk) 20:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend for Table 

message: I note that the article implies imams 1-5 are shared with the Twelvers.  However, the list of The Twelve Imams shows Hasan as the second vice Husayn.  So I take it the Ismailis skip Hasan?  If that is the case, it should be specifically stated in that section so that people like me don't get confused!  Am I missing anything, or do the Ismailis skip Hasan for whatever reason?  If so, that might be worth adding to the Husan article too for clarity. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I looked it up, and understand now that Hasan was considered a "placeholder" imam since he wasn't authorised to pass the imamate on to his son for whatever reason.  The only part I'm unclear on:  is it only the Nizaris who think that?  The Mustaali list seems to line up with the Nizari numbers in the current article, so one would think they'd be a number off if Mustaalis and Nizaris differ.  Furhter, someone wrote on the Zayn al-Abidin article that the Tayyabi Mustaali Muslims (Bohra) count his as third vice fourth.  So does anyone have a clearer explanation as to precisely who does/not count Hasan? MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, the Ahmad al-Wafi article says "is the eighth Ismaili Imam according to the Nizari branch of Ismailism, and the ninth according to the Mustaali".  So it appears that going into the Fatimids the numbers are indeed one-off.  But then how is it that both Al-Musta'li and Nizar both count as 19th when they split off?  Or is there some Fatimid caliph the Mustaali aren't counting? MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for [[Hasan ibn Ali]] not being on the list?
Talk:Fudgie Frottage

message: This article needs more of them. Here's a link to some. - Crockspot 23:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I'm guessing female...--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure but since intersex and trans issues are most definitely intertwined in the drag king communities we should get a reliable source (if one is available). Benjiboi 23:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

text: we should probably address that then as I think persona might be more accurate, what do you think? Benjiboi 21:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Potato, potahto... I think it's fairly obvious that the persona is male, and that Lu is biologically female, but can it be sourced? If not, how do we address it? Does it really matter? - Crockspot (talk) 03:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I believe Lu is trans as well as doing drag so it might be best to defer until we have a quote from Lu or Fudgie about terms or birth info, etc. Agree it's not that important as of yet. Benjiboi 06:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sure it's important! Since the article is about a persona (character), it relates to acting, and one has to agree that it takes a lot more acting talent for a woman to impersonate a man and create genuine controversy over her gender than for a man to play a man at a drag-related event and get people really confused!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.167.100.243 (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reliable sources have to state the gender, sex etc, and support that this is notable.Sjtoyboy (talk) 03:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article doesn't state this person's sex at birth
Talk:Masomah

message: The lady is known as the Hazrat Ma'sumih Fatimih, which as I understand means Excellency, Immaculate Fatimih; "Immaculate" implying preservation from both sin and doctrinal error.  The list of The Fourteen Infallibles does not include her, yet her shrine-city is one of the holiest to the Shi'ites.  Can anyone explain this? J S Ayer (talk) 03:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Immaculacy
Talk:Syed Hamidul Hasan

message: This article contained 4 external links that seem to have some relationship to the subject, all four were dead. I removed two of them because I couldn't find replacement sources, and the other two I found two sources that speak to the same topic. I am not sure these links should remain, or should be worked into the article some how.
mbj (talk)  21:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 
Talk:N-set

message: This used to redirect to Hypergraph, which makes no sense to me; not only is this term not mentioned there, but it doesn't really belong there either, except perhaps as just one example. On the other hand, one might want to redirect it to Finite set. Similarly, k-subset (actually, k-subsets) used to redirect to Hypergraph; now it redirects here. However, one might want to redirect that to Combination. (At least as long as the terms are actually defined on the target page! Currently, they are.) —Toby Bartels 22:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Georgia Tech Library

message: I'm still working on this-- please bare with me through the mess. thanks. Brian
:I just came across this tonight, and gave you a bit of a hand and some structure. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working

message: What is the relationship between the Georgia Tech Library, Georgia Tech Library and Information Center, Price Gilbert Memorial Library, and Crosland Tower? MaxVeers (talk) 23:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names? 
Talk:Hyalophagia

message: Glass eating is also prominent in some religions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.39.245 (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: I have added a new section and the references section. This is part of my Psychology course assignment. If anyone has comments for me, please let me know. Steparaptor (talk) 00:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, .  It doesn't appear that your course has reviewed either our medical sourcing guidelines or our guidelines for the suggested sections and order of information on medical content.  "Hazards to the body" is not a typical placement for that kind of information, and the source you have used is marginal.  Perhaps  and  can contact your professor and work with your course to help you understand Wikipedia guidelines and policy. There are helpful links at the top of this page that you might use for finding good sources, and please take care not to duplicate content better covered at pica (disorder).  Because there is not much written on this topic in good sources, my recommendation is that this article should be merged to pica (disorder) and redirected there; if you have some good secondary review sources, please list them here.  If you don't have good sources, your time might be better spent working on pica (disorder).  Good luck with your course!  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazards to the body 

message: , I've copied your new text to here for reworking relative to WP:PARAPHRASE.  Almost there, but a little more work to put the text into your own words without following the source to closely is needed.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphrasing 

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Hyalophagia.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Pacific tree frog

message: I wish the article said what s do in the winter. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 03:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hibernate or migrate? 
Talk:Nuqtavi

message: I have read the article by Hamid Algar in the Encyclopedia of Islam that is referenced here.  The only content in that article with reference to the Bab, is what is referenced in the first paragraph that Alĩ Muḥammad Nāżim ash-Sharī‘ah claims that the Báb was taught the Nuqtavi doctrines while imprisoned in Maku and that he incorporated them directly into his Bayān.  The use of the term wahid to denote 19 and how it's used in the Bayan to mark its similarities to the Nuqtavi is synthesis of material, and is the Wikipedia's policy on original research. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis and original research