Talk:Criticism of Sylvia Browne

message: Looks good to me Throw, good job :). Anynobody 23:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I have to thank whoever wrote that, the image I got had me laughing out loud. (I don't mean that in a spiteful way, I just literally imagined a fireman deciding to take a drink from a high pressure fire hose "So thirsty, aughhh!") It still sounds like a bit of an assumption, she said he drowned fighting a fire... maybe he slipped, landed his head face down in the toilet, was knocked out, and then drowned. Since the sprinklers were out of commission, and that's where the water for the fire hoses comes from, I wish she had said fire hose instead of implying it. By mentioning what actually happened, we can show she is implying that he drowned in a toilet, a sink, or a cup of water. Anynobody 07:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drowned himself with his hose 

message: Browne claims success in some cases, that are easily verified. I propose this section be used for those. Anynobody 23:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a good section but I don't think we should start out with Browne's claim that she saved Reagan. A call to the Reagan Library proved it was an outright lie. The schedule for Reagan on that day had him have lunch with a world leader - that's something that takes weeks to plan. - Throw 05:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Hi, Anynobody. Your reasoning makes sense and I'll try to add to the category shortly. In the meantime I've had the misfortune of having to add another person in the Missing Persons category. Let me know what you think. - Throw 09:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable successes 

message: Has anyone else read the Guardian article about her? Is She for Real? Most of the issues discussed on SSB.com are in the new source, so I've resurrected this page. Anynobody 06:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it wasn't deleted for lack of sources, but per BLP? ——Martinphi    ☎ Ψ Φ—— 03:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Source 

message: Source                                                               	Says                               	<notes>
Example                                                              	Example                            	Example
The Guardian Saturday October 27, 2007 Is she for real? by Jon Ronson	Browne is not what she claims to be	Article
Ignored sources                                                      	Ignored sources                    	Ignored sources
Source                                                               	What it says                       	
Source                                                               	What it says                       	
A tag was added claiming undue weight is being given to some sources over other equal sources. So what's missing? Anynobody 03:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag follow up 

message: Removed the 5 day deletion tag. This article is well cited, just too big to fit in with the main Sylvia Browne page. -Zyrxil (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Paper45tee (talk) 01:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion tag removed

message: This section is slightly peculiarly worded.  In the context of the radio interview, it was unambiguous that she meant they would be found alive.  If somebody wants to leave this section the old way (without the word alive) then please preface it with the actual question she responded to, so its clear (as it was in the radio interview) that she unambiguously implicates them being both found and that they would be alive when the finding happens. Sentriclecub (talk) 14:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sago mine incident 

message: A merge proposal has been posted and merge templates have been installed several days ago. If there are no objections posted there (not here), the merge will proceed soon. -- Fyslee (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal