Talk:Hudson Volcano

message: From what I understand, sulfur dioxide is a gas and as such can not be an aerosol. If this is true, the phrase "sulfur dioxide and other aerosols" suggests the wrong thing. 21:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only is it a gas; I'm not sure it is particularly soluble in water, nor can it turn into sulphuric acid without a lot of laboratory work. (No that that error was made in this article) Furthermore it is unwise to speculate on the properties of any chemical affect on the ozone after a volcanic eruption until we know more about the process. (I gather an increase in the water content during the SSW (that I believe always occur with eruptions) merely adds to the scarcity of ozone at the poles in the season. Measurement was extremely suspect at that time and certainly any comparison with data until the 1983 satellite data fiasco was resolved can not be accepted.
Weatherlawyer (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerosols 

message: Who was the Hudson for which the volcano was named? --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Francisco Hudson.. Dentren | Talk 15:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hudson

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mount Hudson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060117134004/http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/frequent_questions/grp7/south_america/question1660.html to http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/frequent_questions/grp7/south_america/question1660.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: I've compiled sources that can be used to write an article on the 1991 eruption[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10106049209354367
], but in this article I've minimized the coverage as the article is about the volcano in general not just its historic eruptions. And the H1 eruption in the Holocene probably was far more significant than the 1991 one, anyway. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Going to ask for second opinions on this POV balance tomorrow. JoJo Eumerus mobile (main talk) 21:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that this article is about the volcano in general and that it has 4,000+ words of readable prose I would suggest creating a separate article for the 1991 eruption. I also think expanding the content about the 1991 eruption in this article might meet WP:UNDUE since there have been more significant eruptions at Mount Hudson earlier in the Holocene. Volcanoguy 20:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Volcanoguy. ceranthor 21:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the 1991 eruption 

message: "CARLOS ASCHERO; DAMIAN BOZZUTO; MARÍA TERESA CIVALERO; MARIANA DE NIGRIS; NATALIA FERNÁNDEZ; NICOLAS MAVEROFF; MARIANA SACCHI Se nos viene la noche. el volcán Hudson y su influencia en el NO de Santa Cruz: integrando perspectivas arqueológicas. Arqueología de la Patagonia: el pasado en las arenas. Lugar: Puerto Madryn; Año: 2019; p. 239 - 249" is accessible via ResearchGate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  For H1 eruption 

message: "Cevo C., J. (1). MANIFESTACIONES VOLCANICAS EN AYSEN (CHILE) ENTRE 1971 Y 1973. Revista Geográfica De América Central, 1(1), 51-74. Recuperado a partir de https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/geografica/article/view/2053" may be useful to describe an outdated view on how the volcano looks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated source on appearance 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. to Hudson Volcano. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Mount Hudson → ? –  As noted in the featured article candidacy, "Mount Hudson" doesn't appear to be the most common name for the volcano. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Well, you were the person who stated that in the FAC. There was certainly no agreement about it.  However, I agree that User:Hog Farm indicated that the question of whether or not to move it should be resolved after the close of the FAC, so why don't you present your reasons why you think it ought to be moved?  For example, what do the most authoritative sources say? -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Global Volcanism Program has "Cerro Hudson". Google Scholar for Cerro Hudson, Mount Hudson and Mt Hudson but with lots of false positives. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Based on what I looked over during the FAC, either Hudson Volcano or Cerro Hudson seem preferable to the present title; "Mount Hudson" has much less usage than those two, even in the sources cited in the article. Hog Farm  Talk 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: There appears to be agreement for a move, but to what title? Polyamorph (talk) 10:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 May 2024