lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samuel Hieronymus Grimm

message: Oh the architecture group .... can you look at Dilkusha Kothi? Victuallers 15:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What links here

message: *"...he produced the only surviving scene of the coronation of Edward VI" Considering his dates, this is an imaginative piece of "history painting" rather than a recording document. --Wetman 05:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Edward VI (12 October 1537 – 6 July 1553).  Is the reference to a lost picture that he copied? --GwydionM 16:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent hunch! "Royal Academy Looks at How Antiquaries Made History" mentions that it was burned in a fire. My hunch, then, is that the fire might have been the fire that burned the old House of Lords in the Palace of Westminster, 16 October 1834. --Wetman 19:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Impressive bit of research. - Well done. Will you or have you modded the article? Sorry, I took the British Library quote a bit too literally Victuallers 20:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coronation
Talk:RAAF Museum

message: Both Centenary Flight and detailed construction photographs document this CFS replica aircraft  Hpeterswald (talk) 08:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Imo one photo is enough, but the article could do with a section on the construction of this replica. Changing the subject, anybody know anything about the Deperdussin that this museum apparently owns?TheLongTone (talk) 11:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  "..100 years ago we kicked off military aviation in Australia with three types of aircraft - the Deperdussin, the BE2a and the Boxkite. A century later all three aeroplanes grace the hallowed turf of Point Cook again at the RAAF Museum. A sight which you will not see anywhere else in the world..." per RAAF Hpeterswald (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

text: The pic looks ok (is it "Public Domain"?), however the article should at least mention the existence of the Boxkite replica in its collection to justify inclusion of the pic. And whether it is on display or not. As for text related to the construction of the replica, it may fit better in the article about the Bristol Boxkite itself. Hope this helps. Regards, DPdH (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

text: * For now I suggest add more text to the caption explain the Centenary Flight part. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Replica" Bristol Boxkite photographs
Talk:Karaoke box

message: What is this about so called 'special KTV's being just called KTVs in China, where as KTV without special ladies, are just called Karaoke?  I dunno where someone heard this from, but if it is anywhere close to being true it must be a regional thing.  Having lived in China and visited HK, Macao, Beijing, Guilin, etc etc, I have never heard of this.  Karaoke is pretty much just called KTV, during conversations in Cantonese, Mandarin, and English.  Having also visited KTV bars, and what you could consider to be Special KTVs (we called them Chicken Clubs, and also had nightclubs, and hookers).  I'm not denying such places exist, just that is not what they are called, at least universally on the mainland. --SnakeSeries 18:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Special KTV

message: I have observed one example of a karaoke box in the San Francisco, CA, USA, area: the Music Tunnel KTV, located at the Pacific East Mall, southeast corner of Pierce Street and Central Avenue, Richmond near the El Cerrito city limit east of Interstate 80.  From casual observation of the lobby songlist, the Music Tunnel appears reasonably well-stocked with Japanese-, Korean-, and Chinese-language song tracks, in addition to English-language tracks commonly used in karaoke bars throughout the Bay Area.  Unlike some K-boxes in Asia, the Music Tunnel, which maintains a no-alcohol policy, has no K-bar in the lobby.  Are there sufficient examples of establishments in the United States similar to the Music Tunnel to warrant a brief description of rules commonly encountered?  B. C. Schmerker (talk) 07:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re:KTV outside Asia
Talk:Robert Blackburn (aviation pioneer)

message: need to add to List of aviation pioneers PamD 15:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  when expanded... 
Talk:The Bird That Drinks Blood

message: === Should they be translated? ===
You may have read the Korean version(by the beloved, Golden Bough) of The Lord of the Rings and may have been taken aback at the name of Goldberry translated as...금딸기, or Gold Strawberry.
Names in the Bird series are, especially the names of places, in simple old Koreans, such as 하늘누리.
Do you think when the Bird series is introduced to non-Korean readers, these names should be translated, or kept as a Korean word(e.g. Haneulluri)? QCat 20:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About translation of names 

message: You may have read the Korean version(by the beloved, Golden Bough) of The Lord of the Rings and may have been taken aback at the name of Goldberry translated as...금딸기, or Gold Strawberry.
Names in the Bird series are, especially the names of places, in simple old Koreans, such as 하늘누리.
Do you think when the Bird series is introduced to non-Korean readers, these names should be translated, or kept as a Korean word(e.g. Haneulluri)? QCat 20:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should they be translated? 

message: I translated 하늘누리 Haneulluri as Skywhere, because 온누리 Onnuri, the most commonly used word that ends with -누리, means "everywhere". The suffix -누리 is also an old Korean word for "the world." So I looked up some old English words, and found "woruld" from Wiktionary. Between the Skywhere and the Skyworuld, I thought the first sounded simple and easy to grasp, as Haneulluri would be for Korean readers. Do you think this is a good choice, or there is a better alternative? QCat 20:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Haneulluri'' 하늘누리 

message: I first thought, "Govern sky"? But found that chicheon is a short version of chicheona (치천하, 治天下), meaning "governs all under haven; the entire world." So I chouse Governheaven, kind of sounds similar to the double ㅊㅊ. No? QCat 01:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Chicheonje'' 치천제 

message: The same Chinese word, 大將軍, is usually translated as General-in-chief in Wikipedia. So that is what I chose, instead of Archcommander of the previous version, which sounds cool but made-up. QCat 01:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elsi's rank ''Daejangun'' 대장군(大將軍)
Talk:Honey Ryder

message: Is it worth mentioning that in the novel she is singing "'Marion, a plaintive little calypso" rather than Mango Tree, when Bond first meets her? There are four lines from it in the text.Billlion (talk) 17:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Song

message: In this film, just before Honey gets thrown a towel in the decontamination scene, Honey can be seen fully nude. I'm writing this on 03/10/2008 but have never seen it reported before although i've known it for the last 10 years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.220.189 (talk) 22:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honey rider Nude 

message: What's the correct spelling? James Bond articles currently use both variants.--Paracel63 (talk) 14:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The closing credits of the film list her as "Honey Ryder". The article should either be titled "Honey Ryder" as in the film, or "Honeychile Rider" as in the book. Batternut (talk) 14:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ryder or Rider?

message: It seems like the bikini is better off mentioned in the context of the character, since that is whom it is associated with. Specifically, a lot of reception focuses on how the character looks in the bikini and how it established the character as a famous Bond girl.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: The bikini is one of Wikipedia's few articles on notable clothing in art / popular culture, and we need more, not fewer, of those. If anything, I could argue the piece of clothing is more important than the character: there's plenty of bond girls but only a couple of bond clothing items with such a significant impact on overall society. I should probably add I'm not doing that, and I'm not saying the character (this page) isn't notable. What I'm saying is having two articles is fine :) Regards CapnZapp (talk) 12:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really seeing how the bikini is important out of context of the character. It was not worn by anyone else, and part of what makes the bikini notable is the character's scene while she's wearing it. There's probably a reason there are few articles on notable clothing only; most of the time they can be described within the context of who is meant to wear them.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, the probable reason there's so few articles on notable clothing is because this area is traditionally one most Wikipedians aren't interested in and have little knowledge of. If you don't see its importance separated from the character or actress even after reading its article, and this quote in particular , I really don't know what to say. CapnZapp (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[White bikini of Ursula Andress]] into [[Honey Ryder]]
Talk:Catya Sassoon

message: According to the article she married at age 15. Is this correct? In which jurisdiction?86.145.7.37 15:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this information is correct. The info can be found in her obituary and in several magazine article about her. Her parents simply gave her permission to marry at that age. It is slightly unusual, but not completely unheard of. Pinkadelica (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First marriage

message: The article had two different birth dates for Catya, September 3, 1968 and September 8, 1968. The September 3, 1968 date is correct. I corrected the date. 
Source: 
http://www.familytreelegends.com/records/ssdi/search?l=sassoon&ss=X&f=catya&m=&s1=&s2=&s3=&ib=0&ad=&by=&ba=0&dy=&da=0&bm=0&dm=0&bd=0&dd=0&rci=&bci=&rco=&bco=&rst=&bst=&rzi=&bzi=  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.19.19.162 (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Kaunas State Musical Theatre

message: I started updating this article but then got very confused as to what it was referring to by its title. Is it referring to the drama company that occupied the musical theatre building? Both articles need further clarification on what history is being described. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found some more on the drama theatre and outlined the main points in that article. Will expand further on some point from the new sources. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaunas Drama Theatre
Talk:Fradley

message: According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties about 41000 Australians were killed in WW2. I'm sure they're not all buried at Fradley. If there is a signicant number of graves here, or a memorial, then perhaps the article should be reworded. 132.244.246.25 (talk) 12:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian soldiers 
Talk:Courts of the Republic of Ireland

message: If any one can add to the "Appointment of judges" section please do.--92.251.255.18 (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Please expand the "Appointment of judges" section
Talk:Zambia Super League

message: On 29 March 2018 I wrote to the Africa task force of WikiProject Football to request the name change from Zambian Premier League to Zambia Super League. I did not get any reply and so I had to change myself but you check here the official website --Chabota Kanguya (talk) 06:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change Zambian Premier League to Zambia Super League
Talk:Rights Managed

message: i think this page is far far away from being neutral. it clearly incites to 'like' the concept of right managed images, degrading the royalty free one by degrading people who just love what they do without caring about monetary retribution. since i'm 'new' to editing wikipedia, i'd like to know what's the way to go in order to make this a 'neutral' article. --Nbf 15:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this article be titled "Rights Management"? Nrbelex (talk) 13:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: the article has no references and is pretty confused, most of it is on copyright licensing and collective rights management. I will rename it collective rights management and link it to other relevant articles in wikipedia on copyright licensing.--SasiSasi (talk) 13:42, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO Title change and salvage
Talk:Akmola Region

message: This is my image, that a user/customer said was not correct. The one on the left is the old and the one on the right is the current.
   This is what I found online which matches mine.
   This is what I found at Wikipedia showing boundary for province 3   
   same as mine on the left and also matches Google-Earth boundary.
[]
   however, from the Wikipedia page, go down to the list of provinces and click on item 3 Akmola, click on image at right...image matches mine and the one at aboutkazakhstan.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Akmol_obl.svg
Can anyone shed some light on this discrepancy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.173.6.110 (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am trying to verify/clarify the discrepancies in the bounadry for Akmola Province... 

message: I reverted the move of this article to "Aqmola Region" because, while recognizing that the Kazakh consonant is generally written with "q", it is the WP:COMMONNAME that we should be using. Batternut (talk) 14:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Akmola Region versus Aqmola Region
Talk:Nicotine Anonymous

message: Why does the History section keep getting erased?  I'm up for revising it, but I see no need to delete the section entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BLBaker (talk • contribs) 15:50, 21 September 2007 
: I rewrote what was there to better conform to WP:CITE and WP:SUMMARY guidelines. I'm working on a rewrite of the article, it should be finished by sometime next week. - Craigtalbert 16:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey Wizo1fan - I'm making some changes to the article that may seem a little harsh, but I'm more or less just marking the places where new information was added that needs citations and changing the wording of other parts so that it's less of a word for word representation of official Nicotine Anonymous literature. I appreciate you working to keep this page up to date, I just want to make sure everything is cited correctly and above the board. - Scarpy (talk) 20:04, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Double predestination

message: Flex is right. User:Krator (t c) 11:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does your edit summary say this is not a third opinion? --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Aw, man. Ok, I'll change it, but it'll probably take some time (and analyzation) to include all those verses by pointing out who is actually refering to them... but I still think its ridiculous because the bible verses are the primary source documents in Christian theology. Avielh 16:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, the problem is not listing verses so much as the tone and the way the article is written. It needs to be an article summing up accepted knowledge based on reliable sources, not a theological tract or a biblical commentary or sermon. Before you make any changes, be sure to read the guidelines and policies I referred you to above. --Flex (talk/contribs) 19:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, ok. Avielh 14:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion(?)

message: Hi all, it appears from reading the talk page your request for third opinion is no longer needed, and I have removed the listing.  If I've done this prematurely, or if another dispute arises, please use the dispute  resolution process again. -Jaredbelch 04:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for [[WP:3O|3O]]
Talk:City of Playford Library Service

message: Is there a more recent statistic than 2011 - and the last link (August 2005) no longer works). Jackiespeel (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 
Talk:Negau helmets

message: Shouldn't the name Harigast be Harigastiz in the nominative?--Berig 16:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhm, I don't know anyone who interprets Hlewagastiz this way, and it just doesn't work out (see *libjanan "live" and *gans "goose"). The second part of the compound is universally identified with *gastiz "guest". The first part is more uncertain, but probably derived from the root *ḱlew- (see *ḱléwos). Anyway, I don't see what holtijaz (probably derived from *hultan "wood", and unlikely to have any connection with *haldanan in light of the t rather than d) has to do with the question whether Harigast should really be given as Harigastiz. I agree with Berig that it should. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 14:16, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Berig and Blaschke above are correct. On pages 122-3 of Markey's article he states very clearly that the interpretation is Harigasti teiva. Markey posits that it's Germanic mediated through Rhetic, which is what accounts for the lack of the -z/-R nom.sg. ending. I don't think the person who wrote this wikipedia page actually read (the entirety of) Markey's (107-page(!)) article, because earlier in the article Markey indicates that the reading harigas titeiva is the incorrect reading... I will change the page to reflect what Markey actually states in the article, because I don't know a single linguist who would interpret the text as harigas titeiva, it simply defies all logic and makes no sense. Vindafarna (talk) 01:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominalization

message: The article as it stands already contains some discussion of the possibility that the fragment teiwa(z) reflects the Grimm's law change *t -> *d but considering the seemingly less controversially identified Harigasti(z) already demonstrates the change *k -> *h as the first half of the compound *Harjaz is pretty universally reconstructed as deriving from a pan-European form *Kóryos itself usually derived from the PIE root *ker-.
I'm not a linguistic expert or an experienced wikipedia editor myself, so apologies for any mistakes Wulfgifu (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harigasti(z) and Grimm's law
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Burger King menu items (second nomination)

message: So far none of the people who have advocated for delete have tried to qualify their statements. As others before me have stated and as per the instructions for making an argument on a AfD nomination, just linking to a policy page does not qualify as an acceptable argument. To make a qualified argument you must give a reason as to what on those policy pages applies to keeping/deleting an article. Please take the time to actually read the article, view the sources and see if they are reliable, and finally confirm that is or isn't original research. Point out these flaws otherwise you have not made an acceptable point as to why the article should be kept or deleted.
- Jeremy (Jerem43 00:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on arguments for deletion

message: *Comment. I wanted to note that this AfD grew out of  this AN discussion . My part in it was merging the page histories of 3 articles. My research found, as shown by this diff that the vast majority of the old, deleted article is currently incorporated in the current article (that's not to say that the new article hasn't been expanded to include a lot more than the previous). I have been unable to verify Jerem's claims that this "new" article was created due to the Burger King article becoming too large. (note: that argument does apply to the "old" previously deleted article) I have asked for diff to prove this claim, but they have yet to be provided. My own personal research shows that the Burger King "products" section basically remained unchanged during the 2 months between when the last article was deleted and when the new one created. Also if you compare the diffs from the very first edit to the article (Nov 30), to the last day (Feb 3rd) the previous article existed, you can note that the article just isn't incorporating text from the same source that was used to create the first article (i.e. the old "products" section of BK that was spun out in late 2006), but instead is using the deleted content. (which is why I restored the page history of the deleted article, and merged the histories). This comment is in response to Jerem's note at the top. While none of this may have significant baring on the AfD discussion, I just felt the record needed to be corrected if Jerem is going to place inaccurate notices at the top of the AfD.-Andrew c [talk] 14:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment on the note

message: I am using part of the modified note on the Talk:Burger King products page to inform others about the differences between the to AfD discussions. - Jeremy (Jerem43 19:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The note
Template talk:International cricket tours of Bangladesh

message: I don't think the England A team tour of 1994-95 should be included on this template, because
a) It was an A team touring rather than the full national team
b) None of the matches on this tour were of First Class or List A status.
Plus this template omits a Pakistan mini-tour of Bangladesh in 1998-99.
Also I plan on doing an overhaul of this template. If you want to keep the old one, let me know soon.
Madbassist 16:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: England A