lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vancouver City Centre station

message: Hi ... rather than continue to edit war, I suggest we sort this out. So the maps indicate a distinctly different situation between Waterfront and Vancouver City Centre/Granville. Waterfront is clearly a transfer station, as are Lougheed, Production Way, Commercial–Broadway, and Columbia. This is not the case with Vancouver City Centre and Granville. You're right: the leaving the fare zone metric is also in play with Waterfront. What's not in play, however, is that if Pacific Centre, Vancouver Centre, or the Bay is closed, there's no connection between the Expo and Canada lines. Waterfront's transfer is always available because the entire facility is under TransLink's purview. These are not equivalent situations. The ability to get from Granville to Vancouver City Centre "indoors" is a convenience, true, but it depends on at least two different third parties and is not a transfer point in the traditional sense. That would be why, I suspect, TransLink does not indicate a meeting of the lines at those two stations. It's walkable, sure, and convenient, yes. But it's not a transfer. The infobox documentation states: . It's pretty clear the Expo Line does not serve Vancouver City Centre, nor does the Canada Line serve Granville station. —Joeyconnick (talk) 01:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your point that being connected to one another via the underground shopping centre is not viable due to the operating hours of those centres, but the surface connection route (via Granville Mall) does not close. That's why in my last edit to the article I omitted "(via Pacific Centre)". I never said that they were equivalent. If they are equivalent to anything, it is what Commercial–Broadway was prior to the amalgamation in 2009. If the argument is that being located across the street isn't good enough to be consider as a connection, and that they need to be linked somehow, I would also argue that both station are physically connected by the Granville Mall. So, maybe the compromise could be that the stations are connected to the Granville Mall (which they are) and not to each other, but the stations are also independent of the transit mall. Maybe there's two separate connections in play. Granville Mall primary, Granville secondary. Thoughts? Northwest (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Sorry, forgot to address the infobox documentation. How many articles include more than buses? It states "such as buses". Main Street–Science World station and Union station (TTC) go against that "rule". How are they any different? It's pretty clear that the Canadian doesn't serve Main Street station, but every train that stops at that station reminds passengers that long distance bus and rail service are available at Pacific Central Station. Again, the compromising connection is Granville Mall, which serves both stations. Northwest (talk) 03:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-connection to Granville
Talk:Comedy Inc – The Late Shift

message: Does anyone else agree that this information really should be merged with the main Comedy Inc. article (as they are essentially the same program anyway, other than the title and graphics) and all variations of "Comedy Inc. The Late Shift" titles should redirect to it? HarryKnock 17:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was written almost 2 months ago but I've put up merge boxes in this article and the original comedy inc article. I'll make the move if there are no objections within approx. 1 week. Lakeyboy 00:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Physical formatting

message: The information provided is dismal please at least provide more technical detail on low level formating and why it iss done, etc.
I found these articles informative:
*I completely agree that this page should be merged into Disk Formatting, if not simply deleted. The disk formatting page all ready has more detailed (and factually accurate) information on it than this page; this page and the Logical Formatting page both have nothing to add. I propose these two pages are changed into redirects to the Disk Formatting page. Should I just do it myself? --Destructionator 00:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of mountains in Argentina

message: Still to do:further group mountains of the same system, add missing provinces (wikify?). Mariano(t/c) 09:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot the sources Andes.org.uk, ii.uib.no. Mariano(t/c) 09:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded list
Talk:Zamora, Michoacán

message: Was this entered by the Tourism Minister of Michaocan?71.116.43.103 08:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The banner-like image Zamorahidalgo.JPG on the top of the article has me a little concerned.  It looks like a promotional image from a tourist brochure.  I've left a message on the contributor's talk page, and I'm removing the image for now. --LuciferBlack 23:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  unencyclopedic image Zamorahidalgo.JPG ? 

message: The version 14:45, 22 July 2008 71.119.73.109 is translated into Chinese Wikipedia--Wing (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: Sorry if I have responded in an odd way here, but I am new to this.  I just wanted to comment that the banner like image has a license in the public domain because of expired copyright (at the bottom of the image).  So It wouldn't matter if it were from a brochure, it is in the public domain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantis (talk • contribs) 07:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In reply to the bannerlike image 
Talk:Trouble (Coldplay song)

message: Apparently the song's 'musicscape' is minimalist. This does not appear to be a real word. What does it mean? I vote it should be changed to something more accessible to laymen. 86.141.82.75 (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "musicscape"

message: WHAT THE HELL is all that babble about a band called Trouble? What's that got to do with Coldplay? I'm removing it and see if anyone gets upset. DarkBard 08:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Trouble" is a piano-based ballad that underwent many stages of development. In September 1999, the song was dominated by fast guitar riffs and aggressive vocals reminiscent of Supergrass. At the final recording sessions for Parachutes, the song was slowed down to its current form with the new guitar and percussion pieces.
--Efe (talk) 11:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced

message: coldplay
parachutes 188.151.122.253 (talk) 11:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  trouble
Talk:Richard Widmark

message: On ABC NewsRadio this morning, the said he was 91 years of age.  Can someone who knows much more about this actor than I verify his actual age/year of birth?  210.50.60.45 (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Birth certificate and census records confirm Dec. 26, 1914, making him 93. Monkeyzpop (talk) 02:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for answering my question.  I don't know much about Mr Widmark (undoubtedly seen him in films somewhere along the line) but from reading the article, I do appreciate some of his attributes, such as upholding his privacy by refusing to appear on talk shows and managing to maintain a marriage for 55 years in Hollywood.  RIP, old chap.  210.50.60.65 (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Age at Death???

message: To new Wiki-editor Zouave44:  While I did not make the edit and don't care one way or the other, your comment "has been and will be removed" is ridiculous....you do not OWN the article..and you are not the final arbiter....it is a subjective comment to be sure....but not NPOV...I can say more, but I'll stop for now.. Luigibob (talk) 00:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment re OLD WOMAN

message: I don't think this picture belongs in the "Television" section considering that it was his role in a film. Anyone else think it should be moved somewhere else? 76.167.156.93 (talk) 03:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tommy Udo picture 

message: In his filmography, I think "Vanished" links to the wrong movie of that title. 98.92.214.246 (talk) 03:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanished 

message: What did he do in WW2? Paulturtle (talk) 03:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  War Service 

message: Currently the article lists both 1914 and 1916 for his birth. Toyokuni3 (talk) 00:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year
Talk:Arturo Brachetti

message: This guy is a HUGE star in Europe and what he is doing is ground-breaking;  He won a Molière (the French "Emmy") and plays to sold-out houses.  He certainly has the credits to merit an article here.Musikfabrik 08:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kumeū

message: There seems to be a misunderstanding here, at least two of the wineries listed are not considered (even by themselves) to be in Kumeu by many means, Nobilo Wines in considered Huapai, and Matua Wines is considered Waimauku.
Maybe a better solution would be for the page to be moved to say Kumeu & Neighbouring Townships, New Zealand or similar, with redirects for Waimauku, Huapai etc, then subsections based on each 'town'.  --NigelJ talk 08:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bit of a mishmash, true, but can be improved. It has to remain as Kumeu and not be changed to Kumeu & Neighbouring Townships, New Zealand. Moriori 08:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to note (upon recommendation), I have posted a more detailed explaination over at the NZ Wikipedians Notice Board, could we redirect talk of this matter there now. --NigelJ talk 08:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kumeu vs. Huapai vs. Waimauku
Talk:Valve Hammer Editor

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure that Valve didn't make the first versions of this software (for Quake).
*In my understanding valve brought the software, and the developer of it, for use with the Half Life engine. Though the orignal 1.0 relase was made for Quake based games, everything after it has been for Valve products. You will also be hard pressed to find the orignal editor now days as well. --Amckern 08:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, they did buy the software and the developer, but at first it was still "Worldcraft" and still supported any Quake engine game.  Also, looking for Worldcraft redirects here, so there should be some information on the Worldcraft that was, at least historically.  Early versions of Worldcraft were free to distribute (at least the non-paid version) so if any site has those up for download, they could kind of be under see also links.   72.192.237.134 15:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Valve?

message: I just wanted to say that it is not possible to create HL1 maps with Hammer 4.1. A friend of mine has a few years of mapping experience, and wanted to create a HL1 map with 4.1, and he says it's not possible to do so.
: JeFFJuH 10:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hammer 4.1 HL1 

message: The following sentence, currently found in the Level Design with Hammer section, is not only ungrammatical, but also mostly incomprehensible:
Prior to the release of the Source engine, the Editor used only brushes (blocks) called primitives sets of simpler primitives, they can be used in older games that are not based on the Source engine.
I'd clean it up myself, but I'm not really sure what the original author was trying to say.  I suspect it should read something like the following:
Prior to the release of the Source engine, the editor used only geometric primitives called brushes, which were the only geometry allowed in the Quake engine and its derivatives, such as that used in Half-Life.
Ideas?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.194.209 (talk) 01:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Need of Rewrite 

message: I just changed the rating from Start to Stub, in accordance with my discussion with the original rater here: User_talk:Haipa_Doragon#Valve_Hammer_article_rating --DanielPharos (talk) 21:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating changed 

message: Maybe replace the main picture with one of Hammer's logo? The current picture can be placed somewhere else in the article. G. Fire (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I've updated the picture with a more recent and lower resolution version. I believe it conforms to fair use rationales but I am new so I'm not entirely sure. Washington Irving Esquire (talk) 23:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated picture
Talk:Holly Shanahan

message: I don't think she was in Mean Girls.  I suspect that was *Molly* Shanahan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.239.96 (talk • contribs) 
:Yup, the one in Mean Girls was Molly, not Holly. Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 23:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Australia

message: The buildings are sometimes too tall or too short whenever I check CTBUH Smasherdude (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of the buildings are wrong 

message: I've literally seen it today!
108 is definitely not taller than eureka.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PreserveOurHistory (talk • contribs) 11:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: it most certainly is not, by about 20 metres. What you may see is not considered a reliable source. Thanks, —MelbourneStar☆talk 12:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eureka is taller than the 108 (well known!)
Talk:Houston Theater District

message: The page on Minneapolis - not to mention many people I have met in that city - say Minneapolis is second only to New York for theatre seats. How can Houston and Minneapolis both be second? PurplePlatypus 08:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Re read the Mpls article, carefully.  It makes no claim to more live performance "seating" but claims more live theatre performances (but can not be verified).  Jacksinterweb (talk) 04:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calcium in biology

message: Why is protists in quotation marks?  It is a perfectly valid scientific term.  Have removed them. 82.153.195.203 08:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protists in quotation marks

message: Isn't calcium necissary for the heart to beat? --Susan Walton 23:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Calcium and the heart

message: Can the calcium content of the common bean be added? Badagnani (talk) 00:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Calcium content of beans

message: There are some problems of the first paragraph.
Something like[[===formula here</math></math>phosphate]]
Media:Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here
===Other eukaryotes==Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here]] 
appear in the text and I think there is no relationship with the text.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deluxenville (talk • contribs) 11:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calcium in biology---2 Non-humans 

message: Good to see that the section on food sources of calcium refers to sesame seeds. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sesame seeds   - good that they get mentioned

message: Created section Humans to include Dietary recommendations, Food sources and Measurement in blood. David notMD (talk) 13:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humans/Dietary recommendations 

message: In Dietary recommendations:
"May 27, 2016 it was revised to 1300 mg to bring it into agreement with the RDA."
In the table it says: "19-50 years	1000"
Should the table not say 19-50 years 1300mg?
Mermaidthrone (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For setting Daily Value, the highest RDA not counting pregnancy or lactation. Hence, the table is correct that the RDA for 19-50 is 1000 mg/d but the DV is 1300 mg/d because that is the RDA for teenagers. Another example, the iron RDA for men is 8 mg but because the RDA for women who are pre-menopause is 18 mg. the DV is 18 mg. David notMD (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Added more detail on what approved and what not. David notMD (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added health claims content
Talk:United States Maritime Commission

message: Yes, the two should be merged. They cover the same agency. Lou Sander 08:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tagged the article as needing an introduction rewrite.  I'll take a shot at it when I have time, but anyone else is more than welcome to have at it.nf utvol (talk) 20:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro Rewrite 
Talk:Generation V

message: I just wanted to make one final announcement before merging this over to Generation Z. I think perhaps this article could be improved if the name becomes more notable later on, but until then it is best used as a redirect to Gen Z. If anyone has any comments now is the time to make them %%-SYKKO-%% (talk to me) 21:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Wikipedia talk:Don't be a duck

message: As of this posting, the huge image of a duck is completely covering the rest of the article in firefox 1.5.0.2.  Dunno if its CSS or not, but I'll monkey with it... -- N3X15 08:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was trying to get it to cover the title area (so it'd be directly below the tabs across the top in Monobook). Thing is, the DIV seems to mess up the layout of the rest of the page and I haven't figured out a workaround yet. :( —Locke Cole • t • c 08:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a div below the image DIV which fixes the picture-messing-up-thepage problem, though the height will need to be fine-tuned.Cheers -- N3X15 17:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pixxor screwed up
Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation/Archive 12

message: Even I would support the proposal, had Commander not included abbreviation pages.  So, strike the words "(which includes the *LC's / abbreviation pages)".  These replace disambiguation pages, and have their own style and place in the heirarchy. 
That leaves 1 template pair, and several possible added subcategories. Having them as subcategories of Disambiguation is what folks chose last April.  What's the point of :Category:Specialised dab pages?  Seems like needless duplication of :Category:Disambiguation. A distinction without a difference. It's just a spot in the category mesh.  So, why not just locate them under :Category: Wikipedia administration?
However, don't forget that this means maintaining lists plus subcategories; for example Wikipedia:Multiple-place names, and :Category:Geographical locations sharing the same title.  
I agree with Catherine that categories are easier to maintain than lists. Therefore:
----
;Proposal
*The templates to be used on disambiguation pages are 
** (already) adds the page to :Category:Disambiguation, and 
** (already) adds the page to :Category:Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup.
*An additional subcategory system (completely independent of the templates) will be (has already been) set up. Subcategories would be anything that helps humans work on particular pages, such as :Category:Geographical locations sharing the same title or :Category:Human name disambiguation (which has been used effectively before), etc. Each subcategory that applies to the page will be added to the bottom of disambiguation pages after .
Any existing lists will be used to populate the subcategory, and then the list will be eliminated.
----
:--William Allen Simpson 11:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: --William Allen Simpson 00:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: --William Allen Simpson 00:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

text: --William Allen Simpson 00:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support for categories instead of lists
Talk:Vladimir Bakarić

message: I removed the name in Cyrillic from this article. Bakarić was in fact a Croatian politician who had some prominence in Yugoslavia, not the other way round. So I don't feel adding his name in Cyrillic is justified here (unlike, say, in the case of Aleksandar Rankovic or Ivan Stambolic or Tito himself). --Elephantus 08:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyrillic name

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation/Archive 14

message: It seems to me that articles on the actual meaning of the word get overrun by disamb links on labels,  I give examples in benzene first line links to benzin, in ozone a link to o-zone and in Stratosphere first line refers to Stratosphere Las Vegas not actual alternate meanings but labels attached to a record, band or hotel. I am unable to find a clear wiki guideline on how to deal with this situation. I feel that these links belong in the See Also section at the most but not with a prominent pole position on line one. Your thoughts? thanks in advance V8rik 23:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I'm open to alternate ways to present this, the problem is that it's impossible to draw a line saying "This article is so unimportant we won't give it a dablink". And if someone were looking for the Stratosphere Las Vegas (or the album Stratosfear by Tangerine Dream), wouldn't they type "Stratosphere" in the search box? How would they know to look in the "See also" section? That's usually for articles related to the main article, not variants on the name. Do you really think those one-line, italicized, indented dablinks are obtrusive? —Wahoofive (talk) 00:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguating at the bottom of an article has been tried and pretty much abandoned, since few readers will scroll down to the bottom. Those hatnotes don't look too bad. Whatever helps the readers ... Chris the speller 05:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaning vs label 

message: I actually have two questions. Sorry, if it's in the main page, I must've missed it. Is there some sort of criteria for including entries in the dab pages. For example, Legion; there are two entries under video games, which I'm not sure if they deserve to be there. Should I leave them there or remove them. My second question is, if a red link exist, should I link other words in that line. In the case above, Legion (book) is a red link, should I link William Peter Blatty? I'm guessing the answer is no, but would like affirmation.
::The above unsigned comment was posted 20:59, 11 February 2006 by Gflores
:If you can reasonably expect an article to be written, then leave the redlink. (In this case, though, the guild entry is overlinked.) This is not often an easy decision. If it's the flavor of toothpaste preferred by some minor anime character who doesn't even have his own article yet, take it out. For the book, the author's article has some info about the book, so linking to the author will help the reader. Chris the speller 22:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What should be in the dab pages?
Talk:Prayer in the New Testament

message: hopefully, i've cleaned things up. Jpeob 09:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I guess that tag speaks for itself. Article was thrown together over 5 years ago and is unkempt, neglected, poorly sourced, and low quality. I will try to fix in 2012 sometime. History2007 (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality tag

message: Howdy! I think that this article has important content on an important topic, but I would propose to merge it with an existing article Prayer, meditation and contemplation in Christianity. This article would work well as a section under the linked article. Vojo2024 (talk) 03:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: After reading through the article Christian prayer, I found that this article and the other could be merged. More information and discussion can be found on the Christian prayer talk page. Vojo2024 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated merge proposal