Talk:Duck (cricket)

message: I've played village cricket and watched English county and Test cricket for 30 years, and read many books on the game in winters, and I've not heard of the more esoteric ducks mentioned here. They are not named in the Laws of the game, and their use in cricketing tradition must be so sparse that I am not sure they should appear in Wikipedia. I support ducks, golden ducks, pairs and king pairs, but should we go beyond that? Do others feel the same way but perhaps are reluctant to admit ignorance? Ultimately this is about authority - in differences of opinion like that between the two brothers, above, who decides who is right, and on what grounds? - AG, Stockport.
: I think there is space for it... perhaps they should all be clarified as "Irregular ducks" and a note made that they're local names applied to them, and are not canon with laws of the game and such... different places may or may not recognise diamond/sapphire ducks or silver ducks.
::I'd say that duck/golden duck and pair/king pair are common usage. Diamond duck though rare is something I've heard of and has a cite. The other more esoteric ones really need to be cited I think so I've added the tags as appropriate. As to which ones we should include beyond the obvious its really not up to us.... its down to wether they have been used in context by a reputable source. --LiamE 10:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esoteric ducks 

message: Mention the most significant examples? The key duck in cricket history was Don Bradman's last Test innings, dragging his Test batting average below 100 (though almost 40 more than any other batsman). Graham Gooch got a pair in his first Test. The ultimate duck is to get out to the first ball you face in first-class cricket. Has anybody done this, and what might be an appropriate term? - AG, Stockport.
40 more than any other batsman?  Leave it out, Hussey has an average of 86 (100-86=14, not 40!).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.81.216 (talk) 06:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous ducks 

message: As things stand, this article is completely unverified, which is not a good state of affairs. "Duck" itself, "golden duck", "pair" and "king pair" shouldn't be too hard, but some of the others seem dubious to say the least. "Sapphire duck", for example, records no appropriate Google hits that aren't from Wikipedia or its mirrors, and having "often heard" it referred to (see above) isn't going to cut it. Unless someone can find an acceptable source, it should go, and that refers also to "black duck" and the like. Verifiability is an absolute policy requirement. Loganberry (Talk) 01:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the  tag for now, but I'm very much inclined to cut this article down quite a bit, leaving only the types of duck for which references can be found. I can't see any justification for leaving in the likes of "sapphire duck" which are, at best, extremely rarely used. Loganberry (Talk) 00:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I think three-and-a-bit months is long enough to wait. Unless some verifiable sources are given for things like "sapphire duck", then I'm going to be bold and have a go at rewriting the whole article, including only those facts which can be backed up with references. Loganberry (Talk) 15:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrite now complete. Loganberry (Talk) 00:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just to belatedly weigh into the this, the ball-by-ball commentary from cricket.com.au uses the term 'diamond duck' for a zero-ball run-out (second innings, 10.5 overs at http://ls.cricket.com.au/HomeFullScorecardMatchMilestones81_2360_15.html). That should be a sufficiently official and verifiable source, and it's probably a more reliable source than the yahoo answers that it currently links to. Aspirex (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Could we perhaps create a column inside a cricketers stats on their page displaying how many ducks they've scored?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.69.113 (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ducks column 

message: Just to confuse the terminology further, the BBC commentary on the Adelaide test , along with some other sites, is describing Simon Katich's zero-ball run-out as a "platinum" rather than (as this article would currently require) a "diamond" duck. Unless there is some authority to which one can defer, it looks like "diamond" and "platinum" are used interchangeably of both zero-ball dismissals and first-ball-of-innings dismissals. Vilĉjo (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diamond ''vs'' platinum 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Duck (cricket). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ls.cricket.com.au/HomeFullScorecardMatchMilestones81_2360_15.html
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.middlesexccc.com/report-detail.asp?ReportID=163
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified