Talk:Petlyakov Pe-2

message: Vetrov's book on Korolev shows photos of the Pe-2I with the reactive installation RU-1.  As opposed to claim that it was a Pe-2K that was modified.  WHo knows which is correct.  Glushko built the RD-1 engine, and Sergei Korolev built the airplane installation called RU-1.  The project was ultimate not successful because of frequent hard starts (engine explosions) of the RD-1. DonPMitchell (talk) 04:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korolev and Glushko's involvement with Pe-2 

message: The article deals extensively with Finland's use of 6 Pe-2s, but contains no information on the Soviet's use of their own aircraft.  Can someone with sources please elaborate on this rather important information?
Dpenn89 (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet Operational History?

message: In the references section there is the following:
"Ethell 1996, pp. 152-153."
That's it.  No reference of Ethell anywhere else in the article or in the bibliography.  No title given for the work being cited.
Checking the edit history, I see that this is not the case of a bibliography entry being accidentally deleted.  Rather, no further information has ever been provided.
So: who is Ethell and where precisely was the statement being referenced made?
-- g026r (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethell? 

message: Can someone confirm the source used in the lede, about this aircraft being described as a heavy bomber. Lack of range, engines, and payload make this a somewhat puzzling description of the aircraft.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.116.217.75 (talk) 00:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy bomber 

message: :Although fitted with dive brakes etc, the machine appears to have been used more as a multi purpose light bomber. Dive bombing at night is rather risky. I have changed pipe to light bomber in the lede, as it does not appear to have been its primary tactical role. H.T.D. Irondome (talk) 00:47, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusively a "dive bomber"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Petlyakov Pe-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111019102241/http://luftfart.museum.no/Utstillinger/petlyakov_pe2_snute.htm to http://www.luftfart.museum.no/Utstillinger/petlyakov_pe2_snute.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Petlyakov Pe-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927211300/http://www.plastikowe.pl/galerie/lotnictwo/petlakow-pe-2ft to http://www.plastikowe.pl/galerie/lotnictwo/petlakow-pe-2ft
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Which is the correct engine for the Pe-4? The VK-105PF in the text, or the ASh-82 (M-82FN) shown on the diagram
101.98.22.129 (talk) 03:15, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants 

message: This article is a mess and full of outdated information. Smith's book on the Pe-2, one of the definitive sources in English, is mentioned in the bibliography, but never cited in the article. I have rewritten the development history and design sections to use the information from Smith and other more up-to-date books. 169.234.234.159 (talk) 04:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cites references in bibliography but doesn't use them 

message: Is it Buck or Buick? The former seems more likely, but both are mentioned. Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1955-56 Jane's aircraft cited for the reporting name has Buick, as in the car manufacturer, but it probably is buck, seeing as prop planes are supposed to have monosyllabic names while two syllable names are for jets. 129.123.214.138 (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nato reporting name