Talk:To Love Ru

message: Maybe the paged should be moved to "To LOVE-Ru" (without a hyphen between "To" and "LOVE"). I know that both ways of writing are used frequently, but in the japanese wikpedia, the title is written like that, and also at amazon.co.jp. Vinnivince 20:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move/Change title

message: Can Mikado really be considered a main character? Vinnivince 15:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. She is more of a supportive secondary character. I've separated the Characters section into Main and Minor and will include more about the rest in due time. As far as main characters go Lala, Rito, Haruna, and Yami are givens. Zaistin and Mikan I'm having some debate placing as well as Risa and Mio. Fox816 02:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Characters 

message: According to this personal website, the source about Ryoko Mikado's name is the manga vol.5, p.5. Does someone check the authenticity of this information? I don't have this manga series.--Swind (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE : Mikado's name 

message: hey did you know that mikan is not a main character.  she is just rito's sister  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.27.18.121 (talk) 01:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a fair point, she doesn't make many appearances in the story besides select chapters.Kraker2k (talk) 22:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mikan in the Major Character section 

message: I believe the "ECCHI" genre should be included in the genres for  this anime.
Does anyone have any problems with this? Discuss it. I'll change it in a few days if there are no objections. Or, whoever wants can change it now, I have no objections to that.---Mangler13- (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ecchi is not a genre, and thus should not be included.--十八 22:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe someone removed it from the genre per that reason few weeks ago. --staka (T ・C) 00:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That someone was me.--十八 01:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

text: This had been brought up at the project MOS page at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (anime- and manga-related articles)/Archive 3#Is "Ecchi" a genre?. Plus, I could just as easily write off the entry you quoted in the anime article because it is unsourced, and thus is probably large-in-part original research. And while many sites may use "ecchi" as a genre, this could just be a mass misuse of the term. If you want this to go any further, I'd suggest bringing up another discussion at WT:MOS-AM about it.--十八 06:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

text: That's what :Category:Ecchi anime and manga is used for.--十八 21:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, it's not as if Wikipedia is really the #1 source to go to for anime content information. With all the content problems with Wiki, and it's poor reputation, I don't think it's really an issue to be worrying about what the parents are looking for. Plus, Anime News Network is linked on most anime/manga articles on Wiki, and that's a much more reliable source, and generally more helpful in terms of anime/manga information. From what I have seen, if a series is notable in its ecchiness, it'll likely be noted in the lead, but most ecchi series don't do this from what I've seen. And then there are those ecchi anime that have been adapted from eroge (Kimiaru), and the fact that that it says in the article that the source material is an adult game should give the less informed parents some idea what the anime may entail, even if itself is not adult in content. And then that too is not always full-proof, since Kanon and Air were both originally eroge, but both anime are not ecchi in the least. Besides, categories are there to aide Wikipedia readers in finding pages that are related to each other. It's not so much to ask for anyone to scroll to the bottom and see what categories the series is in.--十八 01:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I still largely disagree with the validity of ecchi as a genre. Genres should be included based on what reliable sources call it.--十八 21:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't think any of those would be considered reliable sources, especially not myanimelist or mangareader. Anyone can write anything they wish, but if it's not from a reliable source, it's just original research.--十八 09:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre? 

message: Just drop that 5 millions of manga volumes sold.
To be more precise the news say 500 (ten-thousands) and yes google translation will display 500 millions which is absurd ;) --KrebMarkt 15:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More fuel 

message: *ANN reviews: Shelf Life DVD part 1 Shelf Life DVD part 2 
*Active Anime: Anime part 1 Anime part 2
*THEM Anime: anime s2
--KrebMarkt (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: Should a little info about the monthly sequel series be added,i am talking about To Love Ru Darkness?If anybody agree's please add that little info.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.166.168.10 (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I agree I have never seen Love Tu Darkness yet,so I have no info.74.178.186.35 (talk) 22:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: About the sequel