Talk:More Cowbell/Archive 1

message: I believe the phrase "needs more cowbell" is a reference to a SNL skit.  Should that be mentioned on this page?  Also, why does "more cowbell" redirect to "cowbell"?  
:I'm trying to figure out why a page for this even exists. It's in better condition than a lot of articles of more serious nature. Shadowrun 01:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Believing that SNL has sucked since their teenage years is each generation's rite of passage.  See this Onion article. --Saforrest 22:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: lol, true. However, I too think the '80s was it's prime though. Shadowrun 01:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNL Skit 

message: A film that came out 28 years before the sketch seems a little out of place here.
:yeah. removed. —Alxndr (t) 04:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visconti's 1972 film 

message: I have a vague memory of watching the episode this is on, and I seem to remember that there is a cutaway showing that the SNL band was playing all the instrumental parts on this sketch, except for the cowbell, which I believe Will Ferrell himself plays. Can anyone verify this, and does it matter to anyone but me? Makemi 04:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cowbell player 

message: Who wrote this sketch? I think that ought to be an important aspect of the article for this. --2-18-06 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.185.213.33 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 18 February 2006.
:My understanding is that most SNL sketches are written by the whole group of people who are in them. Most of the time credit cannot be given to any single person, but is given to the whole cast. Some specific characters can be credited, however. Makemi 21:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author of sketch 

message: It is copyrighted and owned by NBC and can not be rebroadcast here on wikipedia. Sorry to end the fun. EdRooney 21:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted. Fair use is claimed and fully explained on the image's page. User's edit is probably in response to the removal of several imagevios from Geno Petralli. | Klaw ¡digame! 22:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No Sir, I don't care about any page about a Gino Petrali. I saw that you have done a slendid job on wikipedia and I was trying to help out. I don't believe fair use applies to this image. I spoke to a lawyer at NBC's NYC offices and they said it needed to come down. EdRooney 14:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can be pretty sure this is a troll given the user's history. --Saforrest 19:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I deleted the GIF 

message: Why is there a link to a list of songs with cowbells? This is about a particular SNL sketch... too  lazy to log in 24.5.125.232 01:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fear not, for I am here to save the day and revert your edit! - CorbinSimpson 01:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd never take seriously someone too lazy too log in. I mean, I'm lazy, but ..... BabuBhatt 02:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: I know when he is doing baseball replays and somebody hits a homerun he says something about needing more cowbell.  Anybody know what exactly he says? BIG Tuna 20:21, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Van Pelt From ESPN 

message: I removed the following from "External links": http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2687249 iFilm version.  Anyone have an updated address that works? - IstvanWolf 05:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 

message: I'm not convinced that the title of the sketch is the title of the fake Behind the Music show.  Unless we have a copy of the script, or can cite a reliable source that gives the title, we can't really claim to know what the sketch is actually called.  --croctotheface, 6 May 2006
*Where does it say in the article that the sketch's title was "Behind the Music: Blue Oyster Cult"? I don't see that anywhere. -- Kicking222 14:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we sure that the sketch was titled "Behind the Music..." etc? 

message: I found that the picture is moving in the article. Can somebody fix the image? or Was piucture like that? I personally think that Picture that I've mentioned are not too much in Wikipedia articles. *~Daniel~*  ☎ 00:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture. 

message: I think the references section needs to be pared down a bit (or possibly a lot).  Some of the references are just not notable enough for Wikipedia. The sketch is popular, and lots of people will make some reference to it--that doesn't mean they all should be on Wikipedia. Also, some of the section reads like an ad, especially for the webcomic. Croctotheface 22:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many references 

message: I just added the fact that the iTunes Store has a playlist called "More Cowbell!", along with more details, in the reference section. I was surprised this wasn't in there already, considering how many people use the store. Nauticashades 10:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  iTunes Store Playlist 

message: The animated gif on the right has been restored per a decision at WP:DRV. It is now up to the editors to decide whether it is a better choice for the article (and whether it is proper fair use to include it). I'm just posting the standard poll format below and will abstain from voting. ~ trialsanderrors 00:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The animated .gif is a cropped portion of the video, an insubstantial portion of the greater work that is not radically altered from the original. A fair use justification similar to the boilerplate screenshot rationale would suffice. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Only if illustrating the source of the derivitive work itself, I believe. Guy 15:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

text: * Plus, every time I see it I have to play Don't Fear the Reaper and it's getting kind of old :-) Guy 12:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More animated cowbell poll 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose as wholly inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Croctotheface 01:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The animated .gif is a cropped portion of the video, an insubstantial portion of the greater work that is not radically altered from the original. A fair use justification similar to the boilerplate screenshot rationale would suffice. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Only if illustrating the source of the derivitive work itself, I believe. Guy 15:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

text: * Plus, every time I see it I have to play Don't Fear the Reaper and it's getting kind of old :-) Guy 12:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey: Should the animated gif be used for the article?

message: Add any additional comments
*As far as this setting some kind of dangerous precedent against using video clips, the test would be, as Chan-Ho says, whether the video adds anything to the article.  I'm not saying that any moving image is wholly inappropriate by definition, but this one is.  The reason people want to include it is for comedy value.  Not having these kinds of animations for amusement and no other reason is what makes Wikipedia different from, say, YTMND.  Croctotheface 04:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Got this peer review by a bot. Feel free to strike out things when you have fixed them.
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.See footnote 
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
See footnote
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. See footnote

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, NauticaShades(talk) 19:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[More Cowbell]] 

message: As I was browsing articles on my watchlist, I saw that there was a comments in the peer review for this article that mentioned eliminating references and potentially reworking the section into prose.  I first did one, then the other.  The section could probably stand to have a few more specifics (but probably not many more, it needs to read like a coherent paragraph) but in general I think that removing every single college or minor league team that ever used the sketch or the song to rally the crowd is an improvement.  Let's try to keep the section from bloating up too much again. Croctotheface 20:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My changes to the References section 

message: Does anyone know what the actual name of the sketch is? Is it actually "More Cowbell" or does it have a different name? If "more cowbell" is just a line from it and not the title of the sketch, the correct article title should be "More cowbell". Axem Titanium 01:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The actual name of the sketch? 

message: I hope it's okay for me to do that, but I stuck a commented line in the External Links section, saying we can't put links to Google Video or YouTube copies of the skit. I know that's been discussed before. If that's not appropriate, someone can of course remove it. Errick 03:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s okay for you to do that. Think Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking to copyrighted works is relevant here. It’s okay to link to copyrighted work, but not okay to link “knowingly and intentionally” to a site that violates copyright. I’m not sure if Google violates copyright (Google Video FAQ on copyright), and I’m probably not the only one. My interpretation is: if I link to a Google video, I don’t do it “knowingly and intentionally” to a site that violates copyright, they say they are actively preventing copyright infringements. So I’m left with making sure that the link complies with WP:EL. --Van helsing 10:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a comment regarding web video archive links 

message: MadTV's classic character Ms. Swan has tons of catchphrases, such as "I teh yuh," "he look like a man," "monkey in the bush," etc. and there isn't a page on those phrases. And now Bold text more cowbell gets a whole page to its self. This page should be up for deletion
:You could nominate it for deletion.  I think the topic is unquestionably notable, though. Croctotheface 06:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An irrelevant page 

message: :Image:Cowbell2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:Cowbell2.jpg 

message: Hello. The More cowbell userboxes are surprisingly popular among Wikipedians, and reference to them is curiously absent from this page. I'd like to add the following to the References in popular culture section:
: Wikipedia itself has a good example of the prevalence of the sketch and its derived catchphrase.  Wikipedians may place  userboxes on their personal page to identify themselves, join lists or groups, pledge allegiances, or just for fun; one of the more popular of these reads: This user advocates the use of more cowbell.
I'm not sure of the appropriateness of including one of the boxes in the article itself, but I think a link may be acceptable, like the last one in the above text.  Any thoughts?
If you wish to quantify the popularity of the userboxes yourself (I haven't counted them, but there seem to be many hundreds), check out these links:
*The more common box
*The alternative box
*The image in the first box (for users that have modified the original template)
*The alternate image  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennywuh (talk • contribs) 19:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections in two weeks so I'm going ahead. ↔ Dennywuh (talk) 10:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I didn't respond right away, I don't check up on Wikipedia daily like I used to.  But I don't think the mention of the userboxes it at all relevant to the article.  It's just not notable to the subject of the article, that being the "more cowbell" SNL sketch.  It's tangential at best. Errick (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Errick. I hesitate to correct you, but this article isn't about the SNL sketch, but about the cultural phenomenon that evolved from it. Line 1: "More cowbell is an American pop culture catchphrase originally derived from a Saturday Night Live comedy sketch". It's on that basis that I included the userboxes, as an example of the reach and popularity of the expression. In this light, do they seem more relevant? ↔ Dennywuh (talk) 13:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia userbox 

message: Should this article be moved to More Cowbell? It should be if it is the name of the skit(s). Kingturtle (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as it stands now the article's title is referring to the pop culture catch phrase itself, not the skit. Although, the article seems to talk about the skit more, so maybe it should be changed. 69.131.74.226 (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of a skit or a catch phrase 

message: I think I heard that the quote was I have a fever, and the only cure... is more cowbell! someone might want to look into that--Pewwer42  Talk  07:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's "I have a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.217.222 (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just looked it up, yes it prescription--Pewwer42  Talk  23:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  quote 

message: After reviewing this article, I believe that it does not meet the current guidelines. 
*The synopsis is too long (WP:PLOT says you should keep it as short as possible and try to avoid going into too much detail about specific jokes).
*I'm not convinced that the images of Walken and Farrell are necessary. The one of Walken is just him in mid speech, while the Farrell one is just him beating the cowbell. Images should be used to illustrate a point that would otherwise be hard to visualize, and I think the lead image is more than enough.
*Too many unsourced statements, especially in the "Comedy vs. reality", "Reappearance in Saturday Night Live", as well as a couple of statements in the "Influence" section.
*The lead should be expanded.
It is a good start, but it still has a ways to go before it is a good article. -- Scorpion0422 03:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: Was'nt there a cowbell on Impetus? Dagoth Ur, Mad God (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Impetus (song)]] 

message: In the article, it says "this sketch is moment number five". What is "moment number five"? 96.20.119.156 (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moment number five 

message: Hey, there's even a free iPhone application now that quotes the sketch and allows you to play virtual cowbell. It probably should go under "influence" -- I'm just too lazy to write it. Actually, I'll just write it lazily and let other people edit it. gohlkus (talk) 22:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, never mind, it's there, just not prominently. But that's okay. gohlkus (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPhone application 

message: This is not necessary in the article. For someone searching for this page, it is highly unlikely that they are looking for anything related to the Iron Maiden vocalist. His name is already linked with an explanation. The reason this exists on the Bruce Dickinson page is because someone doing a search for the name, say they just saw the skit, would be helped by the differentiation of the two people. In this case, there are not 2 'more cowbell' articles, so there is no reason to include the above. Law shoot! 06:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I found it useful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.48.130.33 (talk) 14:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruce Dickinson 

message: The article mentions in one place that one person played the cowbell on the actual recording, but in another place it says another person played it. Who actually played?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.223.18 (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whodunit? 

message: The last "influence" in this section is not definitive. The current wording "... which could be a reference to adding "more cowbell" than the original song." is weaseling; it either *is* a reference or it is not. I understand the prior editors issue, because if this is a reference then it is a rather obscure reference. I will change the wording to say " ... is an obscure reference to adding "more cowbell" than ...". However, even that statement is problematic. Since a reference that obscure would need to be a specific game-play design decision - which would certainly be worthy of a citation.  I will also therefore mark this as needing a citation. If we don't get a citation in a reasonable period of time - then this sentence should probably be removed as indicating an influence of more cowbell.  Dwmc (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence 

message: I think it may be beneficial to explain the joke.  "Behind the Music" was on for a while at the end of the 90s.  It would get you interested in some old song that came out years ago, and all of the people involved.  Maybe someone could explain that?
* In the Chicawgo Reader a cartoon figure of Gustav Mahler (1860-1911) appeared, saying (in a balloon) "More Cowbell."  Mahler allegedly said the cowbell is the very last sound a climber high on the mountain hears from the world below.
* The dates given for Gene Frenkle (1950-2000) could be intended to liner him up with worthy classical composers Zdenek Fibich (1850-1900) and Kurt Weill (l900-1950).
Factoids like these illustrate the thesis that all music is one extended family, on the other hand as Mahler said, there could be just one symphony that "includes everything".Tokerdesigner (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understanding the joke 

message: The edit on February 18th introduced a typo.  The offending line is:
The sketch is presented as though it cooperation.
Arbalest Mike (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since someone (and I think rightly) rolled back the synopsis to the previous version (rather than cleaning up the typo) I went ahead and edited that whole section down to what I thought was a reasonable amount of information. Arbalest Mike (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo Introduced in Synopsis 

message: I'm not really clear how (or if!) this should be incorporated.  I recently found this:
http://cowbellfever.tribe.net/photos/302afc12-e14c-40d0-a408-520bde9dcd1a
Bascially, I parody incorporating the now icon Obama image with another historic event. :)  Should this be noted here?Joe JJC (talk) 04:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama Hope Meets "More Cowbell" 

message: "He didn't really use a cowbell, but a Dr Pepper bottle in the studio." Neither source 1 nor 2 indicate this, and a cursory Google search for this fact only turns up this WP article. It's certainly a notable fact if true, so I suggest it be removed if there is no correct citation.  MatthewBurton (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Pepper bottle? 

message: Christopher Walken was in Ripper (game), a game that featured the song Don't Fear The Reaper. While a minor detail, I thought it fits in the article. Should this be added to the article? Harry Miste (talk) 23:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something I noticed... 

message: someone should find a way to tie this in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmR-2nnt3Ps&feature=related
I'm talking specifically about 1:56 to the end.
ad 11:30 11-10  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edgelife (talk • contribs) 04:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The comments Christopher Walken made pertaining to the cowbell sketch in this youtube video interview have recently been included in the article, as derived from a Details.com interview.Cyoso (talk) 04:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  video 

message: The article claims he produced "Don't Fear the Reaper" and played the cowbell on said track, while also implying that Albert Bouchard played the cowbell on it. Here's what BOC's website says: 
"Thanks to David Lucas, there was a demo tape to be played for record labels. Lucas met the band at the infamous Camp Swan Lake gig, and was so impressed with the group that he offered his eight track jingle studio for them to record a demo. In return, the band recorded the first album there.  
Lucas' ideas and studio expertise were admired by the band, and they kept him involved throughout much of their recording career. David Lucas sings the backup vocals on "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" on both "Agents of Fortune" and "Cult Classic."" (Albert Mond (talk) 03:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Lucas? 

message: While perhaps factual - the article is a bit corny in explaining the skit. It's a joke and all that explaination flattens it out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.82.215.197 (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corny 

message: Who were the writers who developed the skit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.206.94.210 (talk) 17:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writers 

message: The following was removed from the intro, and placed here. Kerdek (Tell me if I screw up) 18:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Article needs to explain who wrote the sketch, who directed it and if necessary, who came up with the idea for the phrase.
It would appear that Will Ferrell wrote the sketch - a detail I've added to the article. 
In 2007 a TV special aired called "Saturday Night Live in the ‘90s: Pop Culture Nation." In it, Ferrell reveals he wrote the "More Cowbell" sketch long before it aired.
The Washington Post featured an article by Paul Farhi about the cowbell phenomenon on Jan. 29, 2005. It states "...Will Ferrel, who wrote the skit..." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46074-2005Jan28.html
The Boston Globe featured an article by Joseph P. Kahn about the skit on April 30, 2005. Quote: "Will Ferrell, who wrote the sketch..." http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2005/04/30/more_cowbell_yes_please_weve_got_a_fever/Cyoso (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was this in the article? 

message: Watching the sketch online, Jimmy Fallon (playing the drummer) appears to actually crack up and laugh when delivering one of his lines, and then spends the next minute or so laughing while trying to conceal it.  The rest of the cast doesn't visibly crack up, or at least I didn't notice it.  Would it be fair to single out Fallon for cracking up, rather than saying that all of them were on the verge of doing so? john k (talk) 14:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who laughed? 

message: Since Gene Frinkel is kind of based on Eric Bloom's appearance, wouldn't it make more sense for Chris Parnell to be playing Allen Lanier, the only member of the BÖC not listed as being played by someone instead of Eric?   That leaves their lineup as the same five players.  Allen Lanier played both Guitar and Keyboards (depending on the song).  Eric also played guitar, but had that kind of chronos-symbol guitar in those days IIRC.   Plus, the cowbell kind of fits with his background on the band, while normally lead singer he wasn't the lead singer for Don't Fear the Reaper, and didn't really start out on guitar.  According to the BÖC FAQ, he complained about not having anything to do with his hands so they gave him a guitar and didn't plug it in, and got a record contract after a record company exec mentioned how improved their sound was with Bloom on guitar, so they kept him on it and he eventually started playing it.   On the credits for their first three albums (prior to Agents of Fortune on which DFTR came out) he is credited as playing something called "Stun Guitar".    Don't get me wrong I'm an Eric Bloom fan, but it would just seem that Frinkle's character was supposed to be Bloom.   Given the Dickinson mix-up not sure how much accuracy matters in this regard though.Aapold (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric Bloom? 

message: Maybe it's against Wikipedia policy, but what this article really needs...is a link to the videos. And more cowbell!
Thanks, 
Kawaiwashu (talk) 13:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to the videos? 

message: *http://somethingelsereviews.com/2013/01/30/we-never-really-thought-much-about-the-cowbell-an-infamous-snl-skits-impact-on-blue-oyster-cult/ quotes Mr. Dharma “We never really thought much about the cowbell, until then. Now, we have to make sure we have the cowbell!” Should this material be added to this and the main BOC article?--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: "The cowbell sketch in dress (rehearsal) wasn't as funny. And then Will changed his shirt, he wore a smaller shirt" if the word "rehearsal" isn't in the original, it should be indicated thus "[rehearsal]" rather than  "(rehearsal)". Rich Farmbrough, 19:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote 

message: We need to put Mississippi State in this article.
MORE COWBELL!
ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 23:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add