Talk:1989 Pacific hurricane season

message: A decent article needs images to improve its quality juan andrés 04:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: image request

message: Is it possible we could make a main article for Hurricane Kiko? it caused severe damage in Baja california, and was one of only 2 major hurricanes to strike the Eastern side of the peninsula. I think it should deserve a main article. Does anyone agree about this? 76.236.187.191 (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't retired, so it wont get a main article. An article for that storm would be nice but not a main article. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Every storm can have an article. However, you just have to wait for an editor to create it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Article for Kiko?

message: I am very concerned at the quality of this article and feel that it does not meet the GA standards, i will try and give some feedback here.Jason Rees (talk) 22:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do 

message: # Looks ok and should be used as a template for the rest of the depressions.
Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed theses issues with a few exceptions. I feel the 4-E does not need an expansion because it is at similar length to weak tropical storms. Given the fact that there is a sub-article for cosme I did not expand the impact section. Throughout the article, the only reason why i don't put forecasters name in because the NHC did not list there name. Again, thank you. YE  Tropical Cyclone 17:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 24E

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://ams.allenpress.com/archive/1520-0493/118/5/pdf/i1520-0493-118-5-1186.pdf
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:47:55, 404 Not Found
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 08:03:04, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=27288878_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search¤tResult=4¤tPage=20
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:47:55, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 08:03:28, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110393927_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search¤tResult=4¤tPage=10
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:47:55, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 08:03:41, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 4 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110975753_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search¤tResult=4¤tPage=0
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:47:55, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 08:03:50, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 5 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php#1989
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:47:55, 404 Not Found
** In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 08:04:03, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 08:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 6 

message: Why was the season effects table moved back? I'd like to point out to you here that I mentioned the season effects table on how it should be in the season summary section along with ACE. I'm sorry, but I don't see any reason not to have it in the season summary section. The effects table summaries the main events in the season, and the season effects section has no other real content in it. Any thoughts on this? YE  Pacific Hurricane 21:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it works better overall as a separate section, and not just added on to the end of the seasonal summary section which should be expanded out further before this topic is listed as a well developed one which is what Good Topics implies.Jason Rees (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the SS being expanded, but if you think about it, what does the season effects table cover? YE  Pacific Hurricane 22:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The effects table is a summary table that provides, generally speaking, the most requested info in once place. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it is a summary. And the seasonal summary section contains the most important info about activity, ect while the lead talks about the notable storms and stuff. YE  Pacific Hurricane 22:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes the seasonal summary section is a summary of the data, but i really think it works better if we have the seasonal effects graphs in a separate especially as they are quite bulky and would take up too much room in the seasonal summary section.Jason Rees (talk) 00:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We could collapse the table as the MOS suggests to do with long tables. YE  Pacific Hurricane 01:44, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Or we could make it slightly simpler by doing something like this. YE  Pacific Hurricane 02:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The season summary should simply describe generally what happened in the season and effects. The table would fit perfectly there, after all, it IS a summary of the season. --TheAustinMan(Talk|Works) 16:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where should the season effects table go? 

message: I strongly believe that this section is required, as Tropical Depression 23E doesnt have enough to sustain a whole section and nor will some of the other tropical depressions when i have finished cleaning this article up.Jason Rees (talk) 22:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but I don't think there is a need for such section for post-1988 EPAC TC's, and if it is, it should go in the season summary section IMO. YE  Pacific Hurricane 22:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly believe that there is a need as the seasonal summuary section is meant to describe conditions during the season and not individual TCs.
I think there should be an "other storms" section for all tropical depressions that did not affect land or cross into CPAC. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  22:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

text: What about for modern seasons like 2012? YE  Pacific Hurricane 22:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was talking about 1989. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  22:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, if it is a level 3 header, not a level 2 header or it goes in the season summary section. I think the cutoff for this should be 1990, when TD's got TCR's. YE  Pacific Hurricane 22:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was always going to be a level 3 header in the subsections of the storms section, as for a cut off we shouldnt have one. If the data can be better presented in an other storms section then we should have it in and not worry about an arbitrary cut off point.Jason Rees (talk) 23:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, we will make it a writers decision more or less. If the writer feels that there is not enough content, then he/she should make such a section. YE  Pacific Hurricane 23:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: and what if an editor disagrees with the writers choice? Jason Rees (talk) 23:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Then, we have a discussion like we are now :P YE  Pacific Hurricane 23:30, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Just for the record - i wasn't planning on separating them with a level 2 header.Jason Rees (talk) 16:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You did put a level 2 header right here. YE  Pacific Hurricane 16:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And then subsequently corrected it.Jason Rees (talk) 16:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other systems 

message: *Can the stuff on Winnie being used instead of Wallis be removed please? I am requesting this as the 1980 NHOP (pg 19), 1981 (pg 23), 1982 (pg 23), 1983 (pg 24), 1984 (pg 24), 1985 (pg 24), 1987 (pg 27), 1988 (pg 28), 1989 (pg 28) National Hurricane Operational Plans all list Winnie as the name to be used in 1983/1989 not Wallis.Jason Rees (talk) 01:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names for 1989 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 1989 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206195446/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1989 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130221101605/http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/atcr/1989atcr.pdf to http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/atcr/1989atcr.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Fails WP:NWX due to the minimal impact. Most of what's mentioned here could be easily summarized within the season section which seems to be quite lacking as of this point. Noah, AATalk 14:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, especially since the season article is lacking. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  04:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Support merge: Nothing remarkable in the storm history and nothing noteworthy about its impact. Thin amount of information available on it overall. Drdpw (talk) 23:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Hurricane Octave (1989)]] into [[1989 Pacific hurricane season]]