Talk:The Death Camp of Tolerance

message: The episode states that "Mr. Garrison came out 2 years ago". Though its true that the episode did premiere 2 years after "4th Grade", its funny how the children are actually still in Fourth Grade.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AznWarlord (talk • contribs) 22:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Time Issues

message: I don't like this bit:
"Also, Mr. Garrison relates Newton's law of motion to the endothermic reaction of Lemmiwinks gerbilling, two concepts that are completely unrelated in the scientific field as one is related to chemistry and the other physics."
These concepts are intrinsically related, as temperature (endoTHERMic) is a product of the kinetic energy of molecules. Not that i really care, it is, after all, just a south park article. 219.90.160.6 14:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  science 

message: I'm a big fan of parodies, Weird Al especially, but I think South Park just went overboard in my book, that is way to extreme to be considered funny. I have been to the Museum of Tolerance, and I am offened by the name of this episode. This is (to me) totally unacceptable to be aired on public television. User:ilikerad
Then it is a good job it is not up to you! This is a fantastic episode, showing how people 'choose' what they wish to be tolerant/intolerant against, and very funny.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.83.126 (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parodies 

message: In the trivia section it says:
* While neither Butters nor Tweek were with the boys in the previous two episodes, they both go with Stan, Kyle and Cartman to the museum.
In fact, both boys were in the previous episode (The Return of the Lord of the Rings to the Two Towers) with Butters appearing as Gollum, and Tweak was dressed as a fictional character with a coffee can strapped to his head as a helmet. Was this meant that this is the first time that Butters and Tweek appeared together with the regular three, without the rest of the class present?--Cory Kohn 16:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butters and Tweek 

message: I think this section could use the Lemmiwinks lyrics.
--Ashmole 21:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The sound of the Lemiwinks song is the same as the one in the animated Hobbit movie, and I've never heard that sort of music anywhere else. 71.246.76.223 21:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemmiwinks lyrics 

message: Why, in the 1st paragraph does it say it is the 614th episode, whereas underneath the picture it says it is the 93rd? Please tell me if I'm being terrifically stupid with this one, but it just occurred to me now. Thanks, Ninington 13:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read 614 as Season 6, episode 14, rather than six hundred and fourteen. --125.239.47.95 08:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode No.? 

message: I have redirected this episode because it was comprised mainly of plot, and had little to no outside information on the episode. The workers who sculpted the article's efforts were not in vain, though. The episode's contents now exist identically in South Park Wiki. Just so you know. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Cite please;
*The tolerance camp sequences are presented in very similar style to Schindler's List, including being shot in black-and-white.
*The scenes where Lemmiwinks is trying to escape from Mr. Slave include parodies of songs from The Hobbit animated movie, including the title song.
*Lemmiwinks and the animal spirits are also parodies of the Redwall series
Alastairward (talk) 14:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire article is uncited.  Citing the episode and synthesizing an article from it is original research.--Asher196 (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed material again.  A primary source and a blog are not WP:RS--Asher196 (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see the problem with adding facts that creators themselves have said are true. From the Wikipedia policy on primary sources "A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge." I don't think the creators directly claiming that they were parodying The Hobbit requires much interpretation, analysis, or specialized knowledge. Brc2000 (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material