Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fire Protection

message: The dry riser article should be merged with the Fire Sprinker System. In the US, the terms standpipe and riser are exclusive. A standpipe supplies water to a hose system, whereas a riser supplies water to a sprinkler system. This should be resolved with the existing Dry systems section at the Fire sprinkler page. Fireproeng 15:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dry riser article 

message: I think in order to fix up some of these articles, we need to come up with a master plan.  Right now, we have some articles that could be merged, and some that need to be re-positioned.  For one thing, fire alarm needs some work, as it most specifically discusses notification appliances and thus should be positioned as such and reworked for that.
Improvement and changes in technology for fire fighting have historically have been opposed by firefighting personnel, management and politicians. The steam engine was invented in 1712 and was used to pump water out of English coal mines, but it was not until 1830 that the steam engine proved its worth in putting out fires in England so well that fire fighters rioted and destroyed the steam driven firefighting apparatus. It was not until after the Civil War in the United States (reference needed) that steam power was implemented over the objections of firemen themselves by the city council of Cincinnati, Ohio in 1868. 
There has been a "revolutionary" improvement in firefighting says the inventor William Anderson of Bogart, Georgia of a patented process for turning liquid carbon dioxide or compressed carbon dioxide into tiny dry ice pellets in the field avoiding the need for dry ice pelletizing machines and dry ice pellet storage which has been improved to 24 hours without the pellets annealing into a block by placing the tiny, dry ice pellets in a plastic bag and covering this sealed bag of tiny dry ice pellets on all sides with free "sacrificial" dry ice pellets   See YouTube, "Earth Guard Technologies" running time 8:08 in which tiny, dry ice pellets are dropped by helicopters in 1996 according to the time stamp on the video to put out ragging oil and diesel fuel fed fires in seconds. 
William Anderson is secretive and refuses to submit newspaper articles or patent numbers rferrences to inquiring Wikipedians saying that he is about to win large scale commercialization in late 2016 or early 2017. William says he will be incorporating in Switzerland as Earth Guard and will have good funding for his dry ice pellet dropping system for fire suppression which he says has been demonstrated in Saudi Arabia and Australia and soon will be demonstrated to China.
The use of tiny, dry ice pellets to put out fire was made possible by the invention of tiny, dry ice pellet making machines in 1989 by Alpheus Technologies LLC of Rancho Cucomanga, California under a contract by the nuclear power industry to develop uniform tiny, dry ice pellets to "ice blast" the corrosion from the primary coolant loops of nuclear power plants without a complete shut down and without the accumulation of radioactive sand and is now used most often in industry to remove grease.Timothy Beck of Torrance (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master plan? 

message: Hi. I just came across this project for the first time. I am currently a Fire Protection Engineering student at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. This semester, in our Building Firesafety class, each student (33 in all) was assigned a topic related to the course subject. The assignment was to write a paper on the assigned topic and to post it as a wiki to a program called SourceForge. Throughout the semester, each student was required to read each wiki and to contribute in some way. We are now in our final week of class and each student is expected to clean up their wiki for a final grade by Sunday, Dec 10. This means that there will be (theoretically) 33 wikis that could be incorporated into Wikipedia and that fit perfectly into this project.
Some of the wikis were written by foreign students for whom English is a second language; some were not completely exhaustive of the given subject; and some are duplicates of topics that already exist in Wikipedia (and may have used Wikipedia as a resource). Therefore, there is probably a good deal of clean-up that would be required before they could be incorporated. Of course, if this is what you enjoy doing...
In any case, our professor, Dr. Jonathan Barnett, did mention early in the semester that he was considering contributing the best wiki(s) to Wikipedia. You might want to contact him about that. His email address is jbarnett@wpi.edu.
FYI, here is the topic list:
#Aspirating Smoke Detectors
#Atria Egress Issues
#Atria Smoke Control
#Basic Automatic Sprinklers
#Basic Computer Modeling for Building Firesafety Design
#Basic Egress Systems
#Basic Gaseous Suppression Systems
#Basic Heat Detection
#Basics of Explosion Protection
#Basic Smoke Detection
#Basic Structural Fire Protection
#Building Exit Stairways
#Designing Against Terrorism Caused Fires
#Designing Buildings for the Fire Service
#Detecting Fires in Large Spaces
#Designing for Arson Caused Fires
#Dry Pipe Automatic Sprinkler Systems
#Fire Alarm Audibility
#Fire Department Fatalities Throughout the World
#Fire Department Suppression
#Fire Resistance of Concrete
#Fire Resistance of Steel
#Fire Resistance of Timber
#Full Scale Smoke Testing
#Historic Overview of Conflagrations
#History of Fire Fighting Appliances
#History of Fires in Assembly Occupancies
#History of Fires in Tall Buildings
#Horizontal Exits, Dead Ends and Common Path of Travel
#Pre-Action Sprinkler Systems
#Portable Fire Extinguishers
#Residential Fire Problems
#Use of Elevators in Building Egress During Fires
--bc2586 17:52 EST, 6 December 2006
:*drools* I love the idea!  That would be a GREAT addition, as long as it's well-cited.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded Topic List

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 23:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: The first sentance of the Project Page refers to the scope being fire alarms. This isn't correct, is it? Shouldn't this be fire protection? Fireproeng 10:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the wording to read fire protection systems --Daysleeper47 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The project was originally called "WikiProject Fire Alarms", and later expanded its scope, with the related name change.  It seems we missed something when we changed the name.  Thanks for noticing.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title page

message: In order to eliminate confusion between the "Fire Sprinkler" and "Sprinkler Head" articles, and to align the definitions of both articles with modern terminology (e.g., NFPA), the title of the "Sprinkler Head" article should be changed to "Fire Sprinkler", and the title of the "Fire Sprinkler" article should be changed to "Fire Sprinkler System". But as I am new, I don't know how to get this accomplished.Fireproeng 22:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved Fire sprinkler to Fire sprinkler system to conform with the NFPA standard. Before the second move (Sprinker head to Fire sprinkler) can occur, any link which currently points to Fire sprinkler need to be changed to Fire sprinkler system. I will perform as many of those as I can on Monday and once complete, make the second move. --Daysleeper47 23:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire sprinkler system

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 22:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Please refer to my 16 Mar 07 suggestion on Talk:Jockey pump, in which I suggest this very short article be incorporated into the Fire pump article. But I don't know how to get this accomplished.Fireproeng 17:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jockey Pump

message: See Template talk:Fire protection#Convert to bottom box? for discussion on converting the template to a different format.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire alarm template 

message: I would appreciate the comments of the Participants of this WikiProject regarding the Bounding as a term discussion at Talk:Bounding.   Fireproeng 06:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bounding 

message: An  tag has been placed on :Buninyong Urban Fire Brigade, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. All Wikipedians can join the debate at Articles for deletion, where articles asserted to be inappropriate to Wikipedia are discussed. You are encouraged to submit your opinion, and remember that Articles for Deletion debates are not a vote. You can also leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the deletion tag yourself, but don't feel inhibited from editing the article, particularly if doing so makes it clear that it is a useful contribution to an encyclopaedia.   Enjoy, John Vandenberg 09:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four fire brigade articles for deletion 

message: Page(s) related to this project have been created and/or added to one of the Wikipedia:Contents subpages (not by me).
*List of basic firefighting topics
This note is to let you know, so that experts in the field can expand them and check them for accuracy, and so that they can be added to any watchlists/tasklists, and have any appropriate project banners added, etc. Thanks. --Quiddity 20:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of List articles 

message: We as the members of this project have not been active recently in accomplishing much. I would like to propose proceeding with article assessment. I'll wait a few days to see i anyone else want s to join in, and then I'll go ahead and assess a few articles to get things started. A good listing of assessment criteria is at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.
We may wish to also assign priorities to articles, but maybe we don’t have enough articles to work on, I'm not sure. Couldn't hurt, in my opinion. Fireproeng (talk) 00:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment 

message: I'm planning on putting together some photos and words for some articles that don't yet exist:
Chief Fire Warden and Fire warden - members of a building Emergency Control Organisation, who have the right to direct people to leave a building in an emergency.
Warden Intercom Point - a telephone intercom by which a fire warden may speak to the chief warden manning the Emergency Warning and Intercommunication System.
I'm pretty sure that many of these terms will be local to Australia (where I'm a building's Chief Warden), or perhaps to Australia and Britain. Can anyone tell me if any of these articles already exist under other names, and also if anyone knows these by another name, as I'd like to write these in as non-parochial a way as I can manage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psud (talk • contribs) 11:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building Emergency Control Organisation 

message: An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ?  " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - , member of WikiProject Council.  14:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A discussion 

message: Cooper Wheelock has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooper Wheelock. Given that the Fire Protection Template actually uses a Cooper Wheelock siren as its image, I thought that this WikiProject would be interested.Naraht (talk) 15:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cooper Wheelock]] proposed for Deletion 

message: Shouldn't there be something on Water Mist in here? it currently seems to be a small mention in the fire sprinkler system page, yet as I understand it, it's the major technique used on large ships and (as I understand it) in data rooms and the like. Amh15 (talk) 06:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the methods of fire suppression are sufficiently different from sprinklers such that Water Mist should have it's own page. Kilmer-san (talk) 21:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water Mist 

message: I am surprise to see that both entries are not linked to each other when the should be the same. I propose a merge. Opinions?
Fire protection is the preferred term in USA and Fire safety in the UK, with other counties choosing theirs arbitrarily.Grein Grein (talk) 00:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking a quick look at the articles, it would appear that they're not entirely the same.  Fire protection appears to be more building systems and designed-in features, while fire safety appears to be more about the human element of things.  So I see some merit in keeping the two as separate topics, though they certainly should be linked to each other.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  is [[Fire protection]] not the same as [[Fire safety]]? 

message: Can anyone have a look at this list of fire-related topics ? - Skysmith (talk) 12:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of missing fire-related topics 

message: Decided to start contributing to Wikipedia since I've used it so much since its inception and haven't given back. I'm starting on a project I have the most expertise with only to find there hasn't been any recent action here. Is anyone currently working on this, and if so, where? Also, what is in need of the most work? I'll probably start with smoke detection and branch out from there. EEthug (talk) 19:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What we really need most is some really solid sourcing on the articles.  Many are really lacking in that area.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's where I will start then. I will probably be rewriting sections and sourcing the rewrites. Thanks :) EEthug (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Are product specifications considered reliable sources? For example, the product spec of a smoke detector to be cited on Smoke detector. It would greatly improve the quality and accuracy of some of these articles I am looking at editing. EEthug (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Reliable sources are supposed to be independant of the article subject, so I don;t think so. But more importantly, citing detail such as specifications is usually not notable. Basically, we should be inlcuding information that is sufficiently important to be written about in journals, magazines, books etc. which have a history of fact checking and rigorous peer review, and concentrating on secondary sources. Kilmer-san (talk) 21:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stagnant

message: Readers here may be interested in contributing to a discussion at Talk:Firewall (computing)#Requested move. Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion re "Firewall" 

message: Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: 
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 15:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaflet for Wikiproject Fire Protection at Wikimania 2014 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello,  I work for a steel fire door manufacturer based in Italy. I and came across this article finding it very US biased. I believe a more generic view with references to specific world-wide norms is required. Not necessarily US norms are representative for fire safety issues the world over.-- 11:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide view of this subject 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Hello to any WikiProject participants 🙂 As the creator of a few firefighting-related articles, it is a shame Wikipedia at the moment has no active firefighting WikiProject, so I would like to change that. I am proposing to merge the currently defunct Fire Service and Fire Protection WikiProjects into one encompassing WikiProject Firefighting. I am prepared to do all the technical work to make this merge happen, but I wanted to ask first if there was any opposition to the change. I feel a united firefighting WikiProject would better centralize discussion on the topic, and would appeal to a larger/more active community. Any feedback is appreciated, and if none is received on this or the WikiProject Fire Service talk pages, the merge will go through in one week. Cheers! Johnson524 23:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge WikiProject