lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Otley Run

message: Made some changes on the page, including rewriting some sentences which made little to no sense. I'm not quite sure if the "trivia" about the Viva Cuba restaurant is needed, or indeed relevant, but at least now it reads a little easier. Same with the sentence about Bourbon. I also had some trouble understanding the run done in the late 70s, but I'm not sure if anyone will able to help on that one. 89.240.248.239 23:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the classification for determining whether a particular pub or bar is avoided by traditionalist Otley Runners. Is it due to pubs that have only been open in the past fifteen years such as the Box and Arc not having as established a history as the likes of the Original Oak and Skyrack or is it the avoidance of contempary style premises. Also considering the Drydock has only been around since 1993 has this been included on the traditionalist list due to not being of a contempary style. Are there any websites detailing rationale for avoidance as it is not traditional? What are peoples comments on this? --Wrh1973 15:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question regarding classification of "Ommitted by the traditionalist Otley Runners" 

message: Shouldn't it just be put under "possible variations" in the Otley Run article? 82.3.196.17 17:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shotley Run Merge Debate 

message: This needs serious clean up and sourcing! It reads like a guide which is not for an encyclopedia. TO stay we need alot more on the history and the like and less on the practicalities. Plus plenty more sources please.
Ironically I found this via facebook and was a bit disappointed. This ain't what Wikipedia is for :( 
Still I'm ignoring my itchy send to AFD finger for now and just uber tagging the damn thing till someone with more time that me notices :D --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 23:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete (and I've done the run). Mglovesfun (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Arcadia Ale & Wine Bar is certainly on Otley Road but as the bar staff refuse to serve otley runs, large groups, and people wearing fancy dress, it's pointless even trying to buy a drink there while out on an Otley Run - YOU WILL NOT GET SERVED! 
Why is this place repeatedly being deleted from the list of pubs. Whilst it is not a typical student pub I believe it should certainly be on this list as its a pub which serves drinks and would certainly be seen as a stop on the Otley Run route. --Wrh1973 18:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arcadia Ale & Wine Bar
Talk:List of television stations in New Jersey

message: This is a really poor list of broadcast stations in NJ. The key word is 'broadcast'. However, it is clear that some contributors have been adding cable channels, whose numbers to not necessarily correspond to the actual FCC license.
I agree with you wholeheartedly.  The version I set up on November 15 was good, but someone disagreed with a list of analog and digital stations and decided to try and merge them and break them down by city.  Unfortunately, a lot of information was omitted, and the resulting list was a mess.  Thanks for trying to fix it by adding back some of the stations; I decided to just revert it to the earlier version.Rblaster 00:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Carouselambra

message: To the anonymous editors....
Let's get one thing straight right here and now:  Carouselambra was not performed at Knebworth.  The only material from ITTOD that was performed were Hot Dog and In the Evening.  The only material from ITTOD performed at the two Copenhagen warm-up shows were Hot Dgo and In the Evening.  The only material from ITTOD performed on the entire 1980 Tour Over Europe were In the Evening, Hot Dog, and All My Love.  Had the 1980 U.S. tour taken place, then maybe we would have heard this song performed in concert. --Cooleyez229 07:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Knebworth

message: At the top, it mentions that the song is over "ten-and-one-half minutes" in length, but in the "Trivia" section, it says that it's only 10:28. Nothing huge, but I figured it'd be worth correcting.
Fixed.Vonbontee (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy 

message: What "closing credits" are being referred to here? It was 24 hours a day from the launch. What it WAS used as a theme for was a syndicated video program called "Video Concert Hall", circa 1980 or so. If somebody wants to do some research and get a cite for that, they should.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.196.44 (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MTV 

message: Who wrote the lyrics? Andy what is their import and inspiration? Misty MH (talk) 04:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics considerations
Talk:List of television stations in Mississippi

message: I was wondering if someone should add the Memphis, TN stations to the list as well, since they also cater to North Mississippi. 70.146.186.16 08:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because they aren't in Mississippi. They would go in List of television stations in Tennessee. --  ALLSTAR  ECHO 16:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memphis Stations 

message: Thank you to Rollins College via the Wikipedia Visiting Scholars program for access to subscription databases used in compiling this article. -- M2545 (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acknowledgment
Talk:List of television stations in Michigan

message: I recall something on an ABC or CBS affiliate (switched) on channel 8 in Lapeer in the 1980s/90s, but inable to find it on google search. The TV station served the Flint/Saginaw/Bay City area and the region between Saginaw Bay and Port Huron, but would blocked the signal by WXYZ channel 7 from Detroit. 71.102.13.174 (talk) 08:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct Television Station in [[Lapeer, Michigan]]
Talk:List of television stations in Massachusetts

message: There are a couple of things that are not listed here because of the complicated relationship between WGBH and WGBX, both owned by the WGBH Educational Foundation. WGBH-TV (RF channel 5) carries both WGBH-HD (2.1) and WGBX-HD (44.1), along with a CSA with WFXZ-CD for Biz TV (24.1). WGBX-TV (RF channel 32) carries WGBH-SD (2.2) and WGBX-SD (44.2), as well as PBS Create (44.3), PBS Kids (44.4), and three more channels via a CSA with WBTS-CD: NBC Boston (15.1), Cozi (15.2), and NBC LX (15.3).
I'm not sure how to add the cross-carriage of WGBH and WGBX on each other's channels within the format of this article. That happened in part because WGBH moved to the low VHF band as a result of giving up its UHF channel in the reverse spectrum auction; they ended up on RF channel 5 rather than their historic channel 2 because the latter is now occupied by a station in Providence RI. Some viewers are not set up to receive digital TV on the VHF band, so the foundation chose to put SD versions of both of their primary channels on the UHF signal on WGBX-TV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdulcey (talk • contribs) 20:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to add channels that also exist as subchannels elsewhere?
Talk:Coolbellup, Western Australia

message: What's Torquil Road? I live in Coolbellup and I can say for pretty sure that there's no road with that name, and according to the 2004 Streetsmart directory there's no road with that name anywhere in the Perth metropolitan area. I googled it and there's a couple of hits for the Coolbellup Day Care Centre at 219-221 Torquil Rd... that's just up the road from me and I'm pretty sure that's the one at around 219-221 Winterfold Rd (the street numbers seem right). I'm deleting the reference to Torquil Rd unless there's a reason not to.
Also, the southern boundary is both Forrest Rd and the Roe Hwy reserve; there's a small triangle of land, a few hundred metres long, that's NW of the Forrest Rd / North Lake Rd intersection, but is actually in Bibra Lake like the area south of Forrest Rd and east of Stock Rd. Considering the Roe Hwy reserve west of Kwinana Fwy was deleted in 2001, this area may in the future become part of Coolbellup... that's a matter for the City of Cockburn or DOLA I imagine.
Bird of paradox 07:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of television stations in New York (by region)

message: WRNN used to be in Kingston NY. It moved August 2005 to Rye Brook, New York in Westchester county. It is still independent and does the same thing, they just switched places of operation. The signal goes out from there as well. 
69.120.108.17 14:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRNN
Talk:Jan Stanisław Jankowski

message: So how was he "murdered"? Please elaborate. --Ghirla | talk 07:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, whether he was murdered or simply allowed to die remains classified (Russian military prosecutor's office declined to start an investigation when asked by the families of those tried in the Trial of the Sixteen), I elaborated on that one and added one source. On a sidenote, it is highly doubtful he died on his own though. Halibutt 22:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Strict

message: i got very stict with my students  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.1.132 (talk) 01:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strict 

message: This article and the disambiguation page (Strict (disambiguation)) treat the topic of this article as a primary topic. Does this fairly obscure mathematical concept really meet the criteria to be the primary topic of "strict", a word that in the overwhelming majority of uses in the English language does not refer to this concept? Seems very unlikely to me, particularly when Restriction and Stricture don't have primary topics. I'd suggest moving the disambiguation page to Strict and moving this article to something like Strict (mathematics). – Scyrme (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic? 

message: This article is specifically about mathematics and the disambiguation page treats the article as a primary topic. This article should be moved to Strict (mathematics) and the current title should be an article about the English meaning. Strict primarily means demanding rules converning behavior are obeyed and observed. Aitraintheeditorandgamer (talk) 10:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Grand cross (astrology)

message: I've heard numerous mentions of a Grand Cross happening in 1999, as the planets "lined up in the fixed signs of Aquarius, Leo, Taurus and Scorpio, which just happen to correspond to the four beasts of the apocalypse" (see here). Sounds like some people made a pretty big deal about it (the end is nigh! and all that), but I was expecting mention here and found none. Is it actually just not notable, or am looking in the wrong place? -M.Nelson (talk) 06:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here because two separate fiction sources both referred to something called a "grand cross" in or around 1999, and likewise was hoping to find more information. Instead, I only find a bunch of barely comprehensible nonsense about it's astrological meaning. How about historical significance? Frequency of occurrence? Cultural significance? 65.190.247.221 (talk) 19:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1999 Grand cross 

message: I would like to see this line changed from: "ultimately leading to indecisiveness and an inability to produce concrete achievements"
To some like: "The grand cross does not guarantee failure"
Eweezeke (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not ultimately leading to
Talk:Prairie Public Television

message: On the article page it says in about 3 places that KFME started broadcasting in 1964, yet the PPTV website says on their history page they started in 1963. Who's right? Does anyone have an exact date for its first broadcast to set the record straight? -- Jimj wpg 02:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First broadcast year
Talk:List of television stations in South Carolina

message: Some of the SCETV stations do not originate their own programming, but carry the same schedule as WRLK Columbia.  WJWJ, WRET, WNSC and WRJA, however, have their own studios, production facilities, and originate some of their own programming. They are not "satellites" or "semi-satellites" of WRLK. They are member stations of a network. JTRH (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: South Carolina Educational Television
Talk:KSFY-TV

message: I have moved this article from KSFY-TV to KSFY. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KSFY-TV. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 08:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :ABC 4 Sioux Falls and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 25#ABC 4 Sioux Falls until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  feminist (talk) 13:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ABC 4 Sioux Falls" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Fall City, Washington

message: While there is no formal municipal government at present (besides the water district), it is my understanding that there was at some point in the past. Just in case anyone is wondering about the "unincorporated town" dichotomy. -wac(talk contrib) 08:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDP / Unincorporated Town 

message: hi there, i am slightly confused by the demographics information. the table lists 1,638 and 1,993 residents by 2000 and 2010, respectively. the text is about 1,798 by 2010. this is neither the 2000 nor the 2010 amount of the table. furthermore, the values (two decimals in racial markup and others) suggest that they are by 2000 as in other wikipedia articles about washington issues. what went wrong? regards --Vorwald (talk) 08:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Ritchie Neville

message: I gave the article a rewrite. --^pirate 08:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "...attracting a loyal following of local and tourist drinkers with his exceptional mixology skills, becoming a sommelier."
A mixologist makes cocktails; a sommelier is a wine expert. Which is he? The Belgian Ocelot (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sommelier/Mixologist
Talk:Coat of arms of the Netherlands

message: * Dqfn13 (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Support for Henk Bolens' work
Talk:Order of Orange-Nassau

message: What would be the notability level (wikipedia guideline) of the recipients of the award Order of Orange-Nassau 
as Ridder (Knight)?
-Deepraj | Talk 14:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The mere fact that someone is a knight does not imply sufficient notability to justify an article, but it could be one of a group of facts that together do justify this.--MWAK 04:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability criteria for recipients of the [[Order of Orange-Nassau]]? 

message: I propose the removal of this section:
*1) The article is about the order, not about recipients of the order
*2) A number of categories already exist:
**:Category:Order of Orange-Nassau
**:Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (3 P)
**:Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (61 P)
**:Category:Grand Officers of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (38 P)
**:Category:Commanders of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (60 P)
**:Category:Officers of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (54 P)
**:Category:Knights of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (50 P)
**:Category:Recipients of the Order of Orange-Nassau‎ (22 P) 
*2a. Why duplicate the contents of those categories onto this page?
*2b. There are about 300 members of those categories. Certainly there is NO point in duplicating all 300 of them!
*2c. If you are going to chose a subset of them, what criteria are you going to use?
*3) Somebody else has expressed the opinion:
::OPINION: Every year about 4500 people are accepted as a member of the Order of Orange-Nassau, while some 3000 existing members die (see http://www.nrc.nl/binnenland/article1876441.ece/14_vragen_over_de_lintjesregen). The tiny list below is therefore both useless and misleading. 
:I agree. Hence:
*Remove - per above, Pdfpdf (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Notable Recipients" section 

message: Do members of the Order use any kind of post-nominals? And is there a Dutch equivalent of the English title "Sir"? Zacwill16 (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, and no. The only Dutch order that uses post-nominals is the Military William Order, whose recipients are commonly styled RMWO (Ridder der Militaire Willems-Orde). "Sir" does not exist either - while people are sometimes said to have been "knighted", this usually means that they have received some decoration other than Member of the Order of Orange-Nassau (or even any decoration).--JorisEnter (talk) 16:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-nominals
Talk:List of television stations in Washington (state)

message: For the Seattle Area:
RF ch 42 is VC 42.1 on my set - it's some sort of religious channel.
RF ch 44 is VC 44.3 (and .4) - AATV Chinese speaking (and Korean).  97.113.50.171 (talk) 02:08, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please check...
Talk:WorldsPlayer

message: I think this article really needs to have more details added. Maybe explain Worlds, Inc a bit more, or add system requirements? There does need to be more references, though. I don't know, I think this "game" is a quirky little cult classic, like LSD Dream Emulator or something similar. It's a shame more don't know about it. 108.222.205.176 (talk) 02:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis

message: Hi,
Why is there no page on Shrikant G. Talageri?
One can just copy entire Wiki page from http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrikant_G._Talageri to begin with!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.95.81 (talk) 18:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article on Shrikant G. Talageri 

message: "On the basis of Erdosy's and Witzel's mis-citation of Talageri's book's title and name, Talageri concludes that Witzel criticized the book without having read or seen it."
This sentence shows the tone of the whole article. It makes it sound as if Talageri had nothing to say about Witzel's commentary and so was intentionally vague about a retort, based on a rhetorical device. I am rewriting it as:
"Talageri retorted saying that Witzel criticized the book without having read or seen it."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.76.243.10 (talk) 08:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Jason "J" Brown

message: Rewrote and left a note on 203.115.187.88's talk page. --^pirate 08:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know why he seems to speak with a Liverpool accent? Format (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Accent
Talk:Undeclared war

message: I removed "More recent undeclared wars would the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and the 2003 Iraq War.": the US formally declared war on these two countries before invading.
:Uh...proof?  I'm pretty sure I would remember seeing that on the news, seeing how we haven't declared war since World War II.  The "War on terror" doesn't count, since Congress (the only branch of the government that can declare war) never issued a formal declaration of war.--KrossTalk 09:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I checked Declaration of war by the United States and it does not list either Afghanistan or Iraq as declared wars.  Instead, it lists them as "Military engagements authorized by Congress".  This means there were no formal, official declarations of war.  The description under that heading reads as follows:
"Many times, the United States has engaged in extended military engagements that, while not formally declared wars, were explicitly authorized by Congress, short of a formal declaration of war."
I rest my case.--KrossTalk 09:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

text: In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Justice O'Connor writing for the majority declared: "<I>    In light of these principles, it is of no moment that the AUMF does not use specific language of detention. Because detention to prevent a combatant’s return to the battlefield is a fundamental incident of waging war, in permitting the use of “necessary and appropriate force,” Congress has clearly and unmistakably authorized detention in the narrow circumstances considered here.</i>
By recognizing detention as a <I>fundamental incident of waging war</i> O'Connor implicitly gives the AUMF the legitimacy of a declaration of war.--RWR8189 21:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever may be implied, there still is no formal declaration of war! The fact Congress and the COurts accept a clearly unconstitutional situation is not equal to a legal declaration.Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 10:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Examples 

message: I took the liberty to add a sentence on Israel's repeated incursions into Palestinian-held territory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.198.102 (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition
Talk:Cambridge University Labour Club

message: "In recognition of this fact, the name of the society was changed to Cambridge Universities [sic] Labour Club. In 2012 CULC elected its first Anglia Ruskin member to the executive committee." But the opening sentence and title: "The Cambridge University Labour Club (CULC), formerly known as Cambridge Universities Labour Club, is a student political society. . ." are clear that the current (March 2021) name of the club is . . .  University . . . I understand that the plural was at some point intended to convey that it also covered Ruskin.  But three questions: (a) What is the current name? (b) Why the snooty "[sic]"? and (c) If the name has reverted to University, is this because Ruskin is no longer covered by it? Cross Reference (talk) 13:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:KAIT

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 