lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:China Eastern Airlines Flight 5210

message: "...the plane was came into a smoke"? What does this mean? Halidecyphon 21:28, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing phrase 

message: Should this be "screaming"?  Crying seems like a strange reaction, and too quiet to show up on a recording.
What a horrible, horrible sound.
Pekinensis 15:20, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably they were "crying out". Indications are that this article was not written by someone completely au fait with English and we should make allowances. --Jumbo 07:53, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passengers "crying"? 

message: This was not an China Eastern Airline Flight. It war operated by China Yunnan Airlines. http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20041121-0 Niesy74 (talk) 20:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: China Yunnan Airlines merged into China Eastern Airlines in 2003, so the aircraft was operating for China Eastern at the time, not China Yunnan. Meltdown627 (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Airline 

message: The article says that witnesses reported seeing the plane explode in mid-air. Is that consistent with an icing problem being the cause of the accident?Bill (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Explosion?
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Davenport

message: This article is about the closure of the Sacred Heart School in Davenport http://www.catholicmessenger.net/2017/06/saying-goodbye-to-sacred-heart-school/
WhisperToMe (talk) 06:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former school article 

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Disco fries

message: Don't worry, the term "Disco Fries" is prevalent all throughout Jersey, North and South.
Aren't they called Disco Fries because one eats them at a diner after going out clubbing? It's like how one takes a "disco nap" before going out so one can stay up later to party without being so tired.
----
In what region are they called "Disco Fries"? I'm from the NY/NJ/CT tri state area and never heard of them. They're simply Gravy-Cheese Fries. --Discordian 10:13, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
:Seconded. I've never called them anything other than "cheese fries with gravy" unless it's "mozzarella fries with gravy." RasputinAXP 20:15, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

message: i think this page should redirect to Poutine instead of Cheese fries. they are mentioned on the poutine article and resemble that dish more than they do cheese fries, as disco fries invariably include gravy. the poutine article gives a superior impression of disco fries and their origin, as they are more connected with the gravy/cheese combination than a simpler cheese-only topping. i don't think this is a major concern so i'm going to go ahead and do it. ~ Boomur [talk] 23:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well- I kind-of have a problem with it. Just noticed the redir while looking-for the disco fries article. We don't eat cheese curds in New Jersey, and Disco Fries are not Poutine. I'm pretty sure we are not even allowed to say Poutine in NJ. Disco Fries are a part of North Jersey late-night diner culture, and 80's disco-history, so if I would have seen this, I know that I would have had a problem with the redirect. TeeVeeed (talk) 22:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  location of redirect
Talk:Bouncing Stones

message: Nothing is externally referenced in this article and it reads as a joke of sorts, hence the  tag.  --GRider\talk 22:19, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite your references 
Talk:Planimetrics

message: Vandalism Corrected. 
PeterSP 22:27, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Not something I know much about, but this article doesn't seem to have much content. Should it not have a stub notice??
~ I'm not sure if it's a stub but it certainly doesn't do anything to explain what planimetrics are.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.229.164.9 (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully it's a little better now. And explicitly stub-tagged. -- Perey (talk) 05:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this not a stub?
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis

message: To Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis:
*Support move.The current name is too long. No one in the Twin Cities calls it the "Roman Catholic Archdiocese". It should be identified as such in the text as now, but there is no reason to give the article this LONG name that is not used. EdwinHJ | Talk  22:11, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: "It is led by the prelature of an archbishop which administers the archdiocese from the cities of Saint Paul and Minneapolis."
This is awkward wording.  "Prelature" to refer to an archdiocese is technobabble. patsw 02:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward intro 

message: There is in fact a co-cathedral see . The Basilica of St Mary is the co-cathedral.
EdwinHJ | Talk 13:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-cathedral

message: Per the MOS, should the archbishop, archdiocese etc always be referred to as "Saint Paul" rather than "St Paul" (or worse "St. Paul"), since the city's official site seems to currently heavily favour the full form? DBD 12:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably yes, more because the archdiocese itself exclusively uses the full form than because of anything the city's website says (which amusingly calls itself "City of St. Paul, MN - Official Website", though apparently it uses the full name ewerywhere else). Since this article already does so, this may not be the best place for the discussion, though. Huon (talk) 22:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper name? 

message: Is that reference to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore#History really needed in the history section? I don't quite get what the implied connection is.
Nsteffel (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also: Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore 

message: I checked catholic-hierarchy and find priests in what should be this category on Wikipedia.  Was there ever such a section here on Wikipedia for this archdiocese? Carlm0404 (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It occurs to me that this section, and all sections like it in other diocese articles, are completely unreferenced. This shall have to change. I am hereby tagging the sections as unreferenced and will begin removal in a while. Elizium23 (talk) 06:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other priests of this diocese who became bishops
Talk:Kyiv/naming/Archive 1

message: Are you sure about the original name "Danapirstadir"? I searched for it on Google and came up with nothing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.60.81 (talk)  02:44, 5 January 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danapirstadir 

message: I just noticed that the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv is starting to use that spelling. . It hasn't moved the DNS spelling for the site yet and it doesn't look like it has filtered up to the State Dept. yet though. older ≠ wiser 21:23, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. embassy is starting to use Kyiv spelling  

message: OK, here some more evidence why we cannot rely on the Google Test as being the definitive test for naming disputes.
* Currently I get 3,730,000 hits for "Kiev" without modification. 
*I noticed that many of these hits were actually about a model of camera. So if I add the qualifier -camera to the search I get 1,800,000 hits. 
*And what about the open source computer language compiler? If I add -compiler we are down to 1,720,000 hits 
*This is a ratio of just a bit more than 3 to 1 over Kyiv, with 509,000 hits
I don't think the evidence, even using this unreliable method, is quite so overwhelming anymore. older ≠ wiser 16:32, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on Unreliability of Google Test
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver

message: Article moved from "Archdiocese of Denver" to "Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver" for (1) uniformity with other Roman Catholic diocesan article titles as per wiki standard and (2) clarity between denominational diocesan territories of similar names. --Gerald Farinas 23:00, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would be fine with reducing the mention in the lead of ABC's position, but I maintain it should be mentioned there in some capacity. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 16:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it doesn't---Balloonman Poppa Balloon 22:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaput

message: Samuel Joseph Aquila is not the Archbishop of Denver until he is formally installed.  The Archdiocese remains under an Apostolic Adminstration until Aquila takes canonical possess of the Diocese on July 18, 2012.  Aquila is the Archbishop Elect or Designate until that point in time.  He remains the Bishop of Fargo, but his authority is now limited.---Balloonman Poppa Balloon 20:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: wasn't sure if it was designate or elect, but ArchDen is using the designate title.  (Elect is used when a person hasn't been consecrated as a bishop, but there is no special consecration for ArchBishop.  So it is designate.)---Balloonman Poppa Balloon 21:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Samuel Joseph Aquila]]

message: Hello there,
My name is Patrick Finegan and I work for the Archdiocese of Denver. I manage our websites and our brand. I would like to remove the current main shield displayed on our page and replace it with our official logo. I tried to upload it to the page but was unable and received a message saying it was unable to verify the authenticity of the image. 
Any help would be appreciated. You can find the logo here.
Thanks!
Patrick.finegan (talk) 22:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo Incorrect 

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Mobile

message: Article moved from "Archdiocese of Mobile" to "Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Mobile" for (1) uniformity with other Roman Catholic diocesan article titles as per wiki standard and (2) clarity between denominational diocesan territories of similar names. --Gerald Farinas 23:06, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Upper and Lower Egypt

message: 199.243.42.32 turned this article into a one-sided polemic about the ethnicity of ancient Egyptians.   I'm tempted to slap an NPOV tag at the top, but I'll leave that to wiser heads. 24.39.212.83 23:16, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: well, the Egyptians were certainly not Norse (or Greek), but from the illustrations it is clear that they have lighter skin than their Nubian slaves. Anyway, this would be disputed at best, and it's inappropriate to speak of fallacies in this case. I couldn't find the link promised in the claim, so I erased reference to it, but I kept the attribution of the hypothesis to Champollion  even though I didn't verify that. dab (ᛏ) 08:59, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the Upper and Lower Egypt Chiefdom? Nick C. (talk) 03:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chiefdom 

message: Did people in Upper and Lower Egypt have things in common? 71.254.193.213 (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???
Talk:In Your Honor

message: Moving it to bonus tracks, but noting that it appears on UK version of In Your Honor on the first disc as track 11.
This band/album/etc. is not UK based in any sense, and the official tracklisting is American. Different countries get different tracks  anyway, so to say one is official over the other would be absurd when they have different bonus tracks. The only exception is the American tracklisting because it doesn't have any bonus tracks, that which counts as the official regular tracklisting. 131.125.115.15 (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sign 

message: I think we should have the genres like this:
Disc 1: Alternative Rock
Disc 2: Acoustic Rock
What do you think? Titan50 (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acoustic 

message: I was wondering about the spelling of the album title and eponymous track because the article title and image both say "In Your Honor", but the copy I have here says "In Your Honour" in the cover artwork, track listing and lyrics. Is this because I have the UK edition?
--94.3.95.201 (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My UK copy also has "Honour". This should be mentioned. Does anyone have a good source. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honour/Honor 

message: The album artwork and CD labels feature a drawing of a buffalo. Does anyone know its origins? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffalo
Talk:Tank-plinking

message: : my mistake. i had written a better article before finding this one. somebody else had linked to tank plinking in a different article, and when i searched for it, tank-plinking did not come up. so i have put a redirect here, and pointed it at the better article over at tank plinking. sorry for the mixup. Avriette 23:58, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  oops
Talk:Motorola DCT6412

message: This isn't an encyclopedic entry. Shouldn't it go onto Wikibooks? - 211.30.184.38 10:51, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a HOWTO document 

message: I had a new 3412 installed a couple of months ago - twice in ten days it has reset and wiped all recorded material and recording schedules - is this a known fault?  Can it be triggered remotely by Comcast?
==========
I do tech support for comcast and we can't remotely wipe your dvr's hard drive. If you find yourself missing saved programs try unpluging it from the power source for 30 seconds and then pluging it back in.
==========
I don't see why it's not possible. There is a procedure in the Wikibook (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/How_to_use_a_Motorola_DVR/Resets) to wipe it, and I assume there would be a remote capability. That said, there have been MANY reports by users of the recordings and schedules being erased after a reboot since the 74.53 software and/or 16.xx firmware were rolled out. It's hard to say which is at fault as both are usually rolled out together. The current guess is an oversensitive fix for corruption issues that caused the 12/31/89 recording bug. (Note: Put 4 squiggly lines ~~~~ at the end of your post so it gives your name and date/time.) Andyross 14:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncommanded hard drive reset - 3412 

message: I don't see why it's not possible. There is a procedure in the Wikibook (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/How_to_use_a_Motorola_DVR/Resets) to wipe it, and I assume there would be a remote capability. That said, there have been MANY reports by users of the recordings and schedules being erased after a reboot since the 74.53 software and/or 16.xx firmware were rolled out. It's hard to say which is at fault as both are usually rolled out together. The current guess is an oversensitive fix for corruption issues that caused the 12/31/89 recording bug. (Note: Put 4 squiggly lines ~~~~ at the end of your post so it gives your name and date/time.) Andyross 14:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Anthem

message: "The Red Flag" isn't a song used by socialists today, as most of the parties using it and it's association are rather socialdemocratic... Socialists will sing "Internationale" or some such. (PogoVanKreuz 14:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Flag

message: From what I can see, an Anthem as a form of religious music is not uniquely Anglican.  Shouldn't the article say something like "such as Anglican"?  Maybe someone with more knowledge can comment.  So far as I can tell it sounds like anthem is an Anglican name for a motet.  Kjaer (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It devloped vfrom the pre-Reformation motet, but is treated separately within music theory (there's a separate article in Grove for example).  David Underdown (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniquely Anglican?

message: * .
was listed at the bottom of the page but not actually used for any inline citations. Kindly keep it here until it is. — LlywelynII 12:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion

message: Am I the only one disturbed by the split in focus here between church anthem and National Anthem? Surely National Anthem is a completely different thing, and anyway has its own entry. In my opinion this one should be used for liturgical examples which have a rich history in many countries. The disambiguation pages anthem and The Anthem are also distinctly unhelpful in that they are just about the use of the word "anthem" as celebratory pop music.Sfjohna (talk) 09:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Liturgical anthem versus national anthem
Talk:Pharmaceutical marketing

message: I hear this claim a lot, but the sources given don't link to a primary source of info. One commonly cited source on the web is this BBC article, but it no longer shows the table: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-28212223 ...but I found the data at archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20141119101441/https://www.bbc.com/news/business-28212223 As a source, it just says a GlobalData study, but no link.
This article relies on industry self-reporting (though the data was given to Congress, so probably isn't an outright lie): https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2019/7/do-biopharma-companies-really-spend-more-on-market
I've removed these references:
* NYT link doesn't say anything about R&D vs marketing spending: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/20/opinion/sunday/no-justification-for-high-drug-prices.html
* This source https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18982834/ cites https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp058136 (Waxman) as the source of 'marketing over R&D', but that article just states how much is spent relative to medical education: "The pharmaceutical industry spends more than $5.5 billion to promote drugs to doctors each year — more than what all U.S. medical schools spend to educate medical students. Major drug companies employ about 90,000 sales representatives — one for every 4.7 doctors in the United States, according to the American Medical Association."
* The text of this is behind a paywall: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18713478/
Also, the Skeptical Inquirer link is only available to subscribers: https://skepticalinquirer.org/2018/03/drug-therapy-hype-the-misuse-of-data/
More review and sources would be good.
(I forgot to sign my comment.)
Unclevinny (talk) 19:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing budget "far exceeds" R&D  

message: While I do not have any better information, the first three paragraphs of section "Regulation and fraud", subsection "United States", are lifted almost verbatim from the New York Times. As a student attempting to find more information, it was frustrating to not only use another computer to circumvent the paywall, but to also find the exact same text I had just read. 163.11.62.69 (talk) 16:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  4.2 plagiarism 

message: — Assignment last updated by ChrisMisu (talk) 02:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu

message: This page is IMHO currently missing the most fundamental criteria of quality and objectivity of information. The incipit used to be not a definition of the term, as it should be.
Furthermore, the information included in the page is currently US-centric, while any breadth of information about pharma marketing practices in other parts of the world are missing.
Finally, the choice of sources is IMHO weak and contentious.
I'm going to have this substantially improved. Ferdinando Scala (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial improvement needed
Talk:Wolverines (Germany, 1945)

message: Augh! I wanted to write an article on post WWII Nazi resistence to allied occupation. But I haven't been able to find any hints even of it existing after combing through google and looking up US army reports. This leads me to suspect that maybe the story was made up, or made to look much more important than it really is. I hope this can be fact-checked further. I'll certainly do some more this weekend  Kim Bruning 00:42, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact-Checking
Talk:List of characters in the Family Guy franchise

message: Is there any reason why Quagmire appears after Diane Simmons in the "Appearances" table? It would seem more sensible to me for Quagmire (main character for all 17 seasons) to be listed before Simmons (recurring character for 8 seasons then guest for 1 season). For that matter, I'd put Joe Swanson (main character for 16 of the 17 seasons) ahead of Diane Simmons as well, although I acknowledge that Joe was only a guest character for the first season, whereas Diane was a regular character. An earlier discussion suggests that back in 2011, the table was ordered as the Griffins, followed by the other 3 main characters, then the remaining recurring characters ordered by first name, but that no longer seems to be the case. Thoughts? DH85868993 (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any objections, I've moved Quagmire and Joe above Diane. DH85868993 (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table order 

message: I suggest this table be reformatted to not take up as much horizontal space.  Even on a full-sized screen, it's too wide for most windows, and it's almost impossible to read on a mobile device.  Perhaps change the column headings from "Season N" to just "N", and eliminate the Main/Guess/Recurring text completely, leaving just the color coding, with a color key at the bottom?  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about reducing the table width (although I tried changing the column headings as described above and it didn't seem to make any difference), but I note that MOS:COLOR advises against using only color to convey information ("Ensure that color is not the only method used to convey important information"). DH85868993 (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances table formatting` 

message: I’m assuming m means main character and r means recurring character but what does g mean 142.126.185.19 (talk) 23:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Guest. –CWenger (^ • @) 00:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances list 

message: Table shows Cleveland Brown Jr being voiced by Mike Henry and Kevin Michael Richardson simultaneously which cannot be correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.72.111 (talk) 23:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance table incorrect for Cleveland Brown Jr?