lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brazilian Integralism

message: I'm not familiar with this subject myself, but you may be interested in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fascism -- "Brazilian Integralism IS NOT Fascism" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fascism#Brazilian_Integralism_IS_NOT_Fascism -- Writtenonsand 14:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazilian Integralism: Fascism or not?

message: This article says that Salgado opposed anti-Semitism.  However, the article on Salgado himself says that the Integralism movement was characterized by anti-Semitism, and does not make any exception for him.  Which is correct?  If the claim in this article is correct, the other article should be fixed, and vice versa.  Either way, we need a source, and I suspect the best sources will be offline and/or in Portuguese. PubliusFL 05:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I beleive Christianity (most likely from a fundamentalist viewpoint) was a central tenet of Integralism, which would suggest intolerance of other religions. Weather this would lead to active persecution is another matter. For instance Benito Mussolini was an atheist but in the early days of Italian Fascism there was no real religious persecution, until the alliance with the Nazis and Mussolini's conversion (sincere? i doubt it myself) to Catholcism 86.159.20.246 (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Integralism and Anti-Semitism

message: The following is all going to need sourcing before inclusion:
--Stlemur 23:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved from article 

message: Brazilian Integralist Action should probably be merged into this article. Tradereddy (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging proposal. 
Talk:Heritage Front

message: They were active in my highschool in Scarborough, Ontario. (David and Mary Thomson Collegiate Institute) I knew who one of the leaders were and they could be found wandering through Thomson Park giving Sieg Heil's with the raised arm salute and trying to recruit/fight. Lsjzl 23:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not necessary for the article but 

message: Does ARA in the article refer to the Anti-Racist Action Network? Perhaps the first use of an acronym within an article should always include its expanded form. CWPappas 06:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it does Lsjzl 00:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed? 
Talk:National Unity Party of Canada

message: Who exactly is he and what is his relation to the Canadian National Socialist Unity Party?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Super-soviet (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: P.M. Campbell

message: I've saw a National Unity Flag in Ontario, and Someone giving a speech about the Reborn of the Party
~~William Wallace~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.188.102.98 (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party Revival 

message: I think we should split this article in two, one for the National Socialist Christian Party & another for the Canadian National Socialist Unity Party. The later was not only formed by the NSCP, but also other Canadian far-right groups, also NSCP & CNSUP had different flags, so they're two differenced parties and deserve different articles, I think.--HCPUNXKID 19:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 
Talk:Elk Park, North Carolina

message: The red dot isn't placed correctly.  I've been to this town and it's on the Tennessee border.  Badagnani 05:15, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Academic Karelia Society

message: Fascism? Why? Kahkonen 02:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took it off. The organization was ultanationalist, but not fascist. Later the Soviet propaganda considered everything anti-Soviet as Fascist. Peltimikko (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Patriotic People's Movement

message: This allegation is just ridiculous & untrue:
"...their militarist, revanchist, and anti-democratic views became popular in the other parties, partly influencing as far left as the Social Democratic Speaker of Parliament Väinö Hakkila." In the days of the Lapua Movement, the predecessor of IKL, Hakkila was kidnapped and severely beaten by the future IKL boys and he had no sympathy at all for both of these movements.--Ukas 19:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll remove it. --Whiskey 06:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Le Faisceau

message: Were any members of the Faisceau also mebers of Marshall Petains Vichy goverment? Merci',Thnks! (DtaedMornAMSpept.4,200921stCent.ByDr.Edson Andre' Johnson D.D.ULC)ANDREMOI (talk) 21:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a question> Were any members of French Faisceau members of Vichy French Goverment?
Talk:Breton Social-National Workers' Movement

message: Its a bit odd that this article does mention at all what policies this had towards the German occupation of France. --Soman 22:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't mention the war? 

message: ? --Soman 12:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deviationist?
Talk:Radola Gajda

message: A very nice start, but I think the intro could use some work. "Radola Gajda was a Czech military commander and politician who...?" What is his significance? What, for that matter is his context? Perhaps "... who fought in both World Wars before turning to politics." Or even better, "...who fought in both World Wars and is best known for X." Fix this up, and we might be able to bump it up to B class I think. LordAmeth 09:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In continuation of the above, there is a need for more in-text citations, as well as an infobox and a picture of the man (if possible). You could also talk a bit more about his career as a politician, his policies and ideals. Some more elaboration of his military career wouldn't hurt, by elaborating on his leadership in the battles. Sniperz11talk|edits 19:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Deutsche Reichspartei

message: The party seems to be most often referred to with its German name in English. When the name is translated German Reich Party is more commen than German Empire Party. On that reasoning I'm going to move the article to the German name. Additionally I think 'Empire' is rather misleading since it has a very different set of connotations than 'Reich' does. Haukur 21:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's an example of naive (and misleading) translation. Norvo (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: This article claims Adolf von Thadden was one of the party's founders.  The party was founded in 1950, but according to the von Thadden article, he was executed by the Nazis in 1944.  Different guy with the same name (his son?), or what? KevinOKeeffe (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's it. His father, also named Adolf von Thadden, was a German nobleman who was indeed killed by the Nazis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NsMn (talk • contribs) 17:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? I only know about his sister Elisabeth MarcoLitz (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adolf von Thadden? 

message: According to this article as it currently reads, the Socialist Reich Party split from Deutsche Reichspartei in 1949, while the latter was not formed until 1950. There is obviously something wrong here but I don't know enough about the topic to correct this. 97.113.149.96 (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in Dates
Talk:Social Alternative

message: There is open debate on rather facism is rightwing or not. People like F. A. Hayek, as well as many others state that these parties are state controled collectivists, and therefore leftwing. -- posted by user:68.57.33.91, moved to talk by Ferkelparade π 10:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article can afford to expand. I would personally like to see what this fascist party's politics are. That is to say: what are their goals, world-view etc etc. Fred26 08:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion?
Talk:Social Action

message: This article makes it sound like Alessandra's problem with Fini was something to do with the fact his comment was made in Israel and apologising for the alliance with Germany. Reports such as the New York Times say that Alessandra's actual problem with Fini was that she took his derisory comments of her grandfather as "absolute evil" as a personal attack on her family name and thus her as well. 
Alessandra has always sought to distance herself from any of the wrongs done to the Jewish people because of Hitler leaning on Italy, she has before visited Israel herself and once said "the entire world should beg forgiveness of Israel" in an interview with Haaretz the oldest Israeli newspaper. The wording looks like communist/red propaganda to try and paint her as anti-semitic or anti-Israel, when she has never once suggest such a thing and as the interview source shows, has actually said the exact opposite of that sentiment. - Gennarous (talk) 01:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange wording on Alessandra/Fini split
Talk:Tricolour Flame

message: I am going to change of this article to English.  Any objections?  aliceinlampyland 12:20, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Perhaps my perceptions of Italian fascism are a bit skewed but I find this sentence very strange: "The RSI is usually seen as the example of what Fascism should have been, in particular as an example of true welfare state."  Correct me if I am wrong but I thought Fascism was always more about the support of nationalism and other conservative ideas.  Welfare states are generally considered to be a liberal idea I think.  While the idea of a welfare state may fall short of being truly socialist, it's certainly heading in that direction and I have strong doubts that Mussolini's intentions were to create such a nation.  It seems to me that this sentence is misleading about the party's actual objectives, claiming a more liberal and populist platform just as the party of Hitler did in it's name (National Socialist).  I'm going to give this article a more thorough look over and maybe do a little more digging but my immediate response to this sentence is that it should be removed.  The idea that "RSI is usually seen as the example of what Fascism SHOULD have been" is also overtly biased and in nature, nothing more than propaganda.  I won't edit this immediately in case there is something I don't know but this really doesn't seem accurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2headedboy (talk • contribs) 22:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Welfare state is one of the core tenets of both fascism and national-socialism. The fact that it is also the goal pursued by today's leftist (what's called "liberal" in the USA) parties is irrelevant - they do not have a unique claim to the idea. -- int19h 10:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welfare State 

message: In agreement with Nightstallion I moved the page back to the original title, "Tricolour Flame". I report here the conversation between me and Nighstallion (taken from his talk page), in which we agreed to make the change. --Checco (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye. —Nightstallion 14:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the move. --Checco (talk) 15:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: nods —Nightstallion 10:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Wallace fountain

message: It would be good to have a table with coordinates for each of the fountains. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: [https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fontaine_Wallace Here it says  : « 95 fontaines de grand modèle (2,71 m de hauteur, le modèle le plus courant) ». Where did you get this 67 figure ? Thks, -- Spiessens 14:36, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  67 or 95 ? 

message: This section includes a few items out of the goegraphical region.V4169Sgr (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: South America section
Talk:National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands

message: I want to insert the statement "Mussert objected to the word party and considered it a movement, but it was and is generally seen as a party." After all, even fascists have the right to self-define them. Andries 23:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: .

message: I am confused by the following statement;
"After May 1943 the SS direction within the occupation became dominant and the NSB became a marginal party."
In what way do these two things relate one to the other?  What form, in other words, did the SS 'direction' take and what bearing did this have on the NSB?  How did these 'changes' relate to the administration of Seyss-Inquhart, and what impact did they have on Nazi policy in the Netherlands?  The NSB had only at the most minimal level been involved in the occupation regime, so in what way did they become 'more marginal'?  I see that two citation requests have been put on this point, but I would ask that this be cleared up as soon as possible.  I personally find this sentence maddeningly ambigious.
White Guard 01:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 1943 

message: Where does the English translation "National Socialist Movement" come from? Is it the official English name the organization used for itself, or did someone here invent it? If so, I would suggest to change it to "National Socialist Action Party"; I think that reflects the Dutch expression Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging more accurately. JdH 13:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Socialist Movement 

message: More then four hours of video footage relating to the NSB. https://archive.org/details/DeNSBInNederlandNationaalSocialistischeBeweging Is it useful as a source, then we can insert it, if no reasons to the contrary are given. --41.151.187.165 (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Over 160 videos are now on Wikimedia Commons (Films by Filmdienst der NSB). 85jesse (talk) 10:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NSB film footage
Talk:Arnulfo Arias

message: They married when she was 18 and he was 63 ? Is there anything anywhere about that relationship ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second wife 

message: Do we not have any photos of the man ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Eurasia Party

message: This should not be a redirect from "Eurasianism" in my opinion.  There are Eurasianists – persons who believe that Europe's natural affinities are or should be with Asia, particularly in contrast to the Americas or North America (Atlanticism) – who have little to nothing in common with a Russian neo-Fascist party.  Rlquall 13:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirect 

message: The Eurasian Youth Union article should be merged into this article, there is no good reason why they should be separated. It is a branch of the Eurasia Party. --Ritsaiph (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be a seperate article. They (ESM) have done enough to warrant a full-fledged artcile just for them.--Piznajko (talk) 08:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

text: A case in point: US / Canadian sancations were on ESM, it's activities are more prominent than Eurasian Party -> separate article is needed.--Piznajko (talk) 15:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 8 February 2016
Talk:Pamyat

message: This page has been marked in need of references since 2007. That is a bit absurd. I trimmed down some of the content that seemed overstated but if it is properly supported please re-insert the anti-semitism and such with clear attribution. Also please note the assorted cleanup done in the last edit and do a proper fix rather than a simple revert. I'm not clear that this is not in fact a simple nationalistic group with some apparently strange conspiracy theories. The use of the swastika in some form is not particularly damning given its long history and the probable identity of the slavic peope as the descendants of the indo-europeans. Not to offer OR or POV, I would just like to see a fair and accurate article. I welcome proper insertion of in-line refs if this is in any part a genuine racist organisation. Obotlig (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper references 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: I think it should be called the "Jesuswastika", LOL. 74.90.57.148 (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol on Logo 

message: Uh...no.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.5.170 (talk) 03:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far right? 
Talk:Slovak People's Party

message: The Letz source really should not be used. Matica slovenská conferences are not reliable for articles related to the Slovak State because it is known for promoting a positive view of that state, against the consensus of virtually all historians who are not from Slovakia and many who are.
 All of this stuff is covered by better sources, such as  buidhe 18:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Letz (Prof. PhDr. Róbert Letz, PhD., https://enrs.eu/en/prof-robert-letz) is a qualified historian, the head of the Department of History, Faculty of Education, Comenius University in Bratislava. He is a member is a member of several editorial boards and scientific boards. He meets all the criteria for citing here in Wikipedia. What is more important - I do not think that any of the quoted sentences is controversial. By the way, several of his works are cited also by Lorman, Thomas (2019).--Ditinili (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable sources 

message: ,
I did not even know about that discussion, but thank you for informing me. Btw., I could not even get forward of it, since to the category I changed to is not the literal subject of the discussion (though may be related at one level distance).(KIENGIR (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! I meant no offence by tagging you in that edit; it was just easiest to do it as an Undo. – Fayenatic London 23:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cat
Talk:Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional-Sindicalista

message: This needs to be merged into Falange (or that article needs to stop in 1937). Any thoughts? --Henrygb 01:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Falange need to be split in one articler dealing with FE until 1937 and another dealing with Falangism in general. --Soman 15:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: a recent anon edit changed 1970 to 1949 for the namechange of the movement. Which is correct? neither is sourced. --Soman 11:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1949/1970 

message: I don't think the English translation in this article accurately reflects what the Spanish name says ... so I'm being bold and changing it. Feel free to change back if you think I've butchered the meaning. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p 04:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of FET y de las JONS
Talk:Central Eastern Alps

message: It appears that the image shown is a diagram/map of a portion of Austria. If someone can definitively give a caption for the diagram/map it would add a great deal to the usefulness of this article. Similar diagrams/maps are used in the related articles
*Northern Limestone Alps
*Southern Limestone Alps
Alan J Shea 05:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Labour Party (UK, 1957)

message: The article contained a sentence:
"The party was even briefly linked to the London gangster Albert Dimes, who hoped to use NLP members against his rivals Bud Flanagan and Jack Spot, two Jewish gangsters who were involved in funding the 43 Group."
This is sourced accurately to Graham Macklin, Very Deeply Dyed in Black, IB Tauris, 2007, p. 53.
User:Elvislived removed the reference to Bud Flanagan, reasoning, "Removed reference to Bud Flanagan as a Jewish gangster. The source cited Macklin Very Deeply Dyed in Black, says that Flanagan was a Jewish gangster, this is wrong. He was in fact a Jewish music hall entertainer." Which, of course he was; at least the well-known Bud Flanagan was. But the source is clear, and Macklin is a reliable and respected authority in the field. I reverted, with the comment: "You might have considered that there could be more than one Bud Flanagan - read the source."
User:Elvislived again deleted the Flanagan reference, saying that Macklin ".. just gets it wrong as he think the Crazy Gang is the name of a gang..."
Now, while it is very risky to question a noted authority, on reflection I think User:Elvislived may have a point. It is, of course, always possible that there was a gangster, real or so-nicknamed, called Bud Flanagan, and he could have had a gang which would naturally have been known therefore as the Crazy Gang, in "homage" to the entertainers, but I have set about further research in this matter and will report back when done. Emeraude (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It was that Bud Flanagan, but the context is wrong. I e-mailed Macklin who explained that two sentences had been corrupted in editing the book. The reference to Flanagan should have appeared in a sentence after "Jewish gangsters like... " referencing him as the noted music hall entertainer. Mackiln also signposted a story in The Guardian that gives detail on the 43 Group, and Flanagan's role, and I have acordingly used this as a reference in rewriting that passage in the Wikipedia article. Emeraude (talk) 09:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bud Flanagan
Talk:November 9th Society

message: Couldn't it just say a football hooligan? Why be club specific?Matthew7785 20:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millwall assosciation 

message: First Paragraph: "They are a group of ignorant bell-ends, to be honest."  While I agree with this statement whole heartedly, from the very little I understand of the editing rules, this would not be considered neutral.
Maybe it's time I signed up and started editing this thing, but if I don't get round to it, please feel free to beat me to it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.19.206 (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An accurate description, but not exactly NPOV
Talk:Union Movement

message: A source that the introduction of this article and its first two paragraphs lean on almost exclusively is oswaldmosley.net, a website ran by former UM organizer Robert Edwards on behalf of the European Action. From a cursory glance it does not provide accurate historical information; for instance, it makes bold claims about conspiring Jews, stockbrokers, Tories and and communists undermining Britain from within, providing no sources for its own claims. I can appreciate such a source for basic claims, but I cannot help but feel slightly queasy at using such a coloured source to make claims such as that the UM is "described as post-fascist". It being described as post-fascist by their own successors, in my opinion, does not a balanced account make.
That said, with my limited research time, I could not find sources that either confirm or contrast this and other claims made in the first two paragraphs about the UM's political leanings, profile and mission. T-Nod (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overreliance on Oswaldmosley.net?