Talk:WWJ (AM)

message: WWJ was not the first commercial radio station, I was tempted to change it in the article but I wanted to make sure we could come to a consensus on this first.  Hholt01 11:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello i really  do appreciate wwj newsradio 950 am For all the work that they have done My favorite station all the time 9:50d AM Wonder how for some numbers of years 2601:406:4D03:9160:8CFF:D060:B4CF:24DB (talk) 05:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First commercial radio station 

message: WWJ (AM) → WWJ — WWJ is the official callsign of the station, and the disambig currently consists of only WWJ and WWJ-TV (both official FCC callsigns). A disambig can be just as easily be accomplised by the use of the For template at the top of the main article." JPG-GR 05:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This move was executed on 12 April 2007. JPG-GR 18:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
*Support as nominator. JPG-GR 18:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments:
::The FCC "recognizing" something is different from the "official" callsign. And, as for the WP-precedent, I could come up with just as many examples or articles that -don't- follow the rule you've stated. JPG-GR 06:44, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the end, it doesn't make any difference, as long as WWJ is turned into a dab and not a redirect. As a redirect, there's no logical argument against my position. JPG-GR 10:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
WWJ (disambiguation) has been renamed WWJ as the result of a move request; one of the two had to go there, and the consensus was in favour of the dab. page getting priority. --Stemonitis 11:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: :Image:Wwj newsradio 78927.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wwj newsradio 78927.jpg