lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tokyo Express

message: ALL the "External Links: Other uses of Tokyo Express" are commercials unrelated to this article or others in WP.  
That seems very unusual, let alone, odd.  They should go.  Saintrain 01:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Going ...  --Saintrain 04:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Going ...  --Saintrain 18:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Gone  --Saintrain 20:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur.  Thanks for throwing them out of here. Cla68 23:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Get rid of the external links?
Talk:Watchung Reservation

message: As a Brit my understanding of Reservation in US parlance is as a place where Native Americans were settled. If this is the case, then the peoples need to be noted. If not, then this should be clarified for the non Yanks (sub section; but have read stuff about the US of A). LessHeard vanU 23:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reservation reservation 

message: Is the final sentence regarding "Failarity" really necessary?  I'm going to re-word it to be less stupid, change it back if you think it was useful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meteorswarm (talk • contribs) 02:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Sentence 

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I have assessed this article as Start-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* Add appropriate section headings per WP:MOS
* The article needs references
* The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion
shirulashem (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments
Talk:Order of the Patriotic War

message: For reference, and following the outcome of this discussion, I am pasting the contents of categories for multiple-time recipients of the Order of the Patriotic War:
; Recipients of the Order of the Patriotic War, 1st class, three times
* Viktor Kulikov
* Ilya Pavlovich Mazuruk
* Georgy Yegorov
 
; Recipients of the Order of the Patriotic War, 1st class, twice‎
* Vladimir Aleksenko
* Vladimir Alexeyev
* Vasily Ivanovich Andrianov
* Talgat Bigeldinov
* Georgy Beregovoy
* Petr Braiko
* Leonid Bykovets
* Konstantin Feoktistov
* Yevgeny Fyodorov
* Polina Gelman
* Valentina Grizodubova
* Nikolai Gulayev
* Nikolay Mikhailovich Gusarov
* Yevgeni Ivanovski
* Vladimir Kasatonov
* Konstantin Krasavin
* Spartak Makovsky
* Vasily Margelov
* Dmitry Alexandrovich Medvedev
* Stepan Neustroev
* Nikolai Ogarkov
* Sergei Ogoltsov
* Ivan Perov
* Vasily Petrov (military)
* Vitaly Popkov
* Nadezhda Popova
* Aleksey Prokhorov
* Endel Puusepp
* Anatoly Rybakov
* Sergei Safronov (Hero of the Soviet Union)
* Nikolai Sergeyev (admiral)
* Anatoly Shapiro
* Samand Siabandov
* Petr Mikhailovich Stefanovskiy
* Yury Votintsev
* Anna Yegorova
* Alexei Yepishev
* Mikhail Zaitsev
 
; Recipients of the Order of the Patriotic War, 2nd class, twice
* Vladimir Chekalov
* Valentin Varennikov
* Mikhail Zaitsev
-- Black Falcon (talk) 04:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple-time recipients
Talk:Humanitarian Overseas Service Medal

message: Am overhauling article. Cut 'n' paste from . -- saberwyn 06:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Amended some information about eligibility of defence personnel, and nature of changes in 2005.  Here's a detailed explanation.
Original Letters Patent issued by the Queen in 1999 established the award, and provide that operations (or 'clasps') can be established by declaration approved by the Governor-General.  The eligibility criteria for each clasp are set out in these declarations.  In 2005 additional Letters Patent were issued by the Queen which set out the eligibility criteria for the Indian Ocean clasp, and provide for further clasps to be estabished for natural disaster operations. The eligible organisations for the Indian Ocean clasp are as determined (by written instrument) by the Governor-General.  The 1999 Letters Patent still stand in parallel with the 2005 Letters Patent.  There have so far been no further clasps declared under the 2005 Letters Patent.
On defence personnel generally, there has never been a prohibition on the Australian Defence Force being an eligible organisation for the medal.  As stated in my edit, it just happened there was either already an ASM for the military operation alongside a declared HOSM operation, or the ADF was not deployed in the same place as a declared HOSM operation.  Also as stated, defence personnel on leave from their service could qualify (and have done so) for the HOSM if serving a declared eligible organisation.  The Indian Ocean clasp is the first time ADF has been a declared eligible organisation, but it is not true that this was made possible by changes to eligibility criteria.
Guran70 05:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits on 13 April 2007 

message: "Notable recipients" referred to "all military personnel involved in Ops Sumatra Assist I and II".  This is not correct.  The Area of Operations for Operations Sumatra Assist I and II are established and defined separately to the "affected area" declared for eligibility for the "Indian Ocean" clasp for the Humanitarian Overseas Service Medal.  The affected area for the medal is restricted to those disaster zones where immediate humanitarian relief was delivered, while the Area of Operations for Ops Sumatra Assist I and II included other areas, e.g. Royal Malaysian Air Force Base Butterworth, where many supplies were received and distributed by ADF personnel.  Hence many ADF personnel who were "force assigned" to Ops Sumatra Assist I and II do not meet the criteria for the medal and are not eligible.
Guran70 02:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit on 2 May 2007
Template talk:Legal status of persons

message: The box needs some sort of graphic or picture; it looks really dull as it is. CapitalSasha ~ talk 06:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Should it be added to the template? faithless (speak) 08:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sanctuary city]] 

message: Political prisoners are rarely accorded seperate legal status to other prisoners, although they may be recognised as such by other governments/organisations, it seems unlikely that their 'hosts' would designate them as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.88.51 (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This list isn't just what the 'host' nation designates them as, but it also inculdes what other governments/organisation designates them as. ThinkingTwice contribs | talk 22:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is for legal terms for persons. Detainee is one, prisoner is one, but "political prisoner" is a subjective nonlegal term. Most of the "political prisoner" designations come from guerrilla movements or sympathetic rights organizations, not foreign governments, who are rightly more conservative about the term, because at the heart of the term you are challenging the host country's legal system. Quigley (talk) 23:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree--Geysirhead (talk) 09:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Prisoner as Legal status? 

message: The dual citizen status for Vatican City does exist. How can this be added? Twillisjr (talk) 19:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vatican City (dual)
Talk:Accountant

message: This seems to be mainly about Hong Kong... I don't mind, I'm writing this in Quarry Bay, but others may think that shouldn't the local material be split off? m.e. 08:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. For instance, there is already an article British qualified accountants, which hives off most of the UK stuff. Matthew 09:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

text: done, see Accountancy in Hong Kong. m.e. 09:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of 香港 

message: I've run through this page mainly making formatting changes. Only the first word in a heading should normally have a capital letter, items should normally only be hyperlinked the first time they occur, and similarly the article title should only be bolded on the first time of mention (I've left a few bolded in the qualifications list for now though. I've also amalgamated forensic/expert witness sections. Could still do with more clean-up though. Jimfbleak 06:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: "Full charge accountant" is a common term in want ads for accountants/bookkeepers in the U.S.  Could that term be added and defined in this article? doncram (talk) 18:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full charge accountant 

message: The US section on the page reads like it has been lifted out of an infomercial or a college brochure. Are YOOOUUU ready to become an accountant? Is YOUURRRRR career stagnant! Call today and get a second accountant free!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.230.2 (talk) 23:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a poor advertisement 
Talk:Mr. Krueger's Christmas

message: I pulled the sentence reading: "It is a popular video/DVD for members of said church to own in their home and enjoy, especially at Christmas time." as it seems rather non-encyclopedic in tone.  What leads one to say it's popular to own by church members?  I'm a member and I don't know if anyone in my congregation owns a copy or not.  Stats?  Mike 06:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Repertoire (theatre)

message: I think that this page should be merged into Repertory, because the idea of resident companies as opposed to one-off static or touring commercial productions in large theatres can be expressed in one article. Festival theatre should remain separate. JohnClarknew 06:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Repertoire is a body or collection of work, a noun. Repertory is an adjective referring to the behaviour of certain theatre companies. Seems to me there that putting them together simply encourages people to use them interchangeably in a way that is quite wrong. I was surprised to find Repertoire (theatre) redirecting to Repertory -- SteveCrook (talk) 12:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Robert de Bingham

message: This article says he was consecrated at Wilton Abbey however English Heritage says it was at St Mary's Church, Wilton.— Rod talk 12:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm... the Fasti (which is where the Wilton comes from) is just saying "Wilton" not Abbey. We can go with just plain "Wilton" and link to the town or we can go with the church. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say go with the town - having done some further reading it appears the church and convent were closely associated.— Rod talk 17:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of consecration 

message: Someone put this into the text "He was also notable for having one of the largest members of any bishop of the time, with a diameter of over 3 inches."  It is not referenced and seems to be vandalism.  It has been there since February.  I'm removing it as it does not add to the stub.  If it needs to go back, feel free to put it back.  UEL (talk) 17:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Unnoticed Vandalism
Talk:Robert Neville (bishop)

message: The last sentence says he died on the 8th, the header that he died on the 8th or 9th: clarification required. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Add the links at [https://richard-iii-of-england.fandom.com/wiki/Robert_Neville_(bishop) as appropriate (my OR).  Jackiespeel (talk) 12:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External sources
Talk:Master Hugo

message: The following statement, which appears in the article on this date, makes a dubious claim that is not supported by—and indeed contradicted by—published research:
He has been credited with having made the ivory Cloisters Cross (or "Bury St. Edmunds Cross"), now at The Cloisters, New York, but this is doubtful; there is no certain evidence to suggest that the cross was even made in England, although this is accepted by most scholars, and other places of origin such as Germany have been proposed (emphasis added).
If there is any reasonable basis for this claim, then the originator needs to add references to the article. Unsubstantiated opinion (such as the statement, "this is doubtful") has no place in Wikipedia.
Published research provides reason to believe that the crucifix credited to Master Hugo is the Bury St. Edmunds Cross.
PlaysInPeoria (talk) 04:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly "published research" (not exactly the right word) that suggests it is, but since the comment was added by an editor (not me) who is a professional art historian specialising in exactly this period (work it out), I am pretty confident there will also be "published research" suggesting it is not, as is often the way. You will notice the MMA currently does not claim it was made by Hugo or in Bury, although it does say it is English, even though Hoving's book of many years ago was pretty confident. I suggest you remove your tag.  What recent research did you have in mind? Johnbod (talk) 04:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bury St. Edmunds Cross
Talk:Osiris D3

message: Osiris D3
This site is about the history of one of the most popular skate shoes, and is not an advertisement.  There is not even a link to the official website.
*Please take a look at the WP:CORP page for more information on the notability criteria for articles about companies.  --Alan Au 08:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't this page be merged with Osiris Shoes? I don't see why a specific shoe model should have a page with more detail than the company producing the shoe. Further, lots of 'facts' about the shoe's popularity need citing. Steve-g 10:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Belinda (Rice novel)

message: The new image is acceptable - it is the actual book cover, but perhaps less controversial than the 1994 book cover. How exactly does one "cite" a book summary other than the book itself?
aelfwyne 19:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My reason for replacing the image had nothing to do with the previous image being "controversial"; first-edition covers are preferred for use in articles if they are available (see the WikiProject Novels' Article Template). It's not the book summary that really needs references/citations, but the other parts, like the lead section and the stuff about the controversy caused by the book. -- SilentAria talk 23:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Contested prod with no explanation. Redirect to author's page reverted by the same editor, also with no explanation. Article has had no references for almost five years. It fails most of the notability criteria for books, the only possible exception being the fifth, "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable." I don't think that history has had sufficient time to judge Anne Rice's historical significance yet, so including this on that basis alone is premature. FWIW, I'm a fan of Rice but don't think this meets notability. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion rationale
Talk:Bachar Houli

message: As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: no further comments at this time  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

message: I'm assuming the stress is on the BASH. Please correct if I'm wrong. kwami (talk) 10:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: I have placed a POV notice on the recently added information regarding the result of the AFL Tribunal hearing. While many news media express concern over the length of sentencing and the high profile nature of his character witnesses, the information that has been added shows bias. It is clearly sarcastic through saying that 'he won the AFL Tribunal lottery' and has made assertions about others in the paragraph that are not sourced and are likely to be false or considered libelous. I would like other editors to help in determining how this paragraph could be edited in order to remove any concerns of bias and/or to help to find sources regarding the material present.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adocrat (talk • contribs) 02:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFL Tribunal Result 
Talk:Comet (disambiguation)

message: *User: Thadius856 wrote: "(RV - No WP:EL in dabs, please)".
*I restored this link. How else can I fit this information in compactly? This meaning of COMET is linked to by an article about weather. Anthony Appleyard 07:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Make an article for it, but please don't link it in dabs. JoeSmack Talk 07:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Instantiation principle

message: I believe the reference to Heit may perhaps refer to a different Instantiation principle? 
Brokenplates\ (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference at the bottom

message: Sorry I didn't speak up sooner.  I believe there is information on this page that is unique and distinct from that information at Abstraction.  If we redirect this article to Abstraction, we lose this information.  I would be in favor, however, of moving the information to Abstraction before we redirect.
I realize I'm somewhat biased here, since I originally created the article, but this idea, while probably too obscure for most readers of Wikipedia, turns out to be (in my opinion) an essential link between Medieval and Modern philosophy, between Francisco Suarez's theory of distinctions (which includes essence/property) and Rene Descartes's "I think, therefore I am".
Again, I'm in favor of moving the information to Abstraction, if it fits better there.  But let's move the text first before we redirect!
(I might end up moving the text there myself, by the way..  eventually)
FranksValli 07:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge and then redirect?

message: Descartes' statement is so widely known as "I think, therefore I am," that "I am thinking" sounds either Martian or as if written by someone whose native language isn't English. Let's change it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.137.5 (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am thinking... 

message: Have tidied the page, but not an expert in this field. The "in realties" statement appears odd, so (having searched and only come up with an irrelevant Lyotard reference) I have added a Citation Needed tag. Te Karere (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Realties" or "realities"?
Talk:Joint Stock Theatre Company

message: Deleted the commie ref as a POV problem.  The idea is an interesting one, and is proposed to be merged into Repertory in a section head. JohnClarknew 07:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Communist?

message: I have deleted the following paragraph from the main article as it is not evidenced, and doesn't properly represent the nature of this theatre company.  I will shortly write a new paragraph - referenced - which gives a better description. 
"As its title suggests, it was run as a Joint stock company; the capital of the company being formed by the contribution of each member, its profit was to be measured in the success of its productions. Thus, it became cooperatively owned by its members. What their contribution was and whether it included the actors in lieu of their salaries was not revealed, nor was what the union Equity had to say about it."
Skeowsha (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisational nature of Joint Stock
Talk:Overlay multicast

message: Yet another page about alternative technologies to IP Multicast?
Okay, looks like we're not alone out there.. but can we merge this
document with either Peercasting or Multicast itself?  --SymlynX 07:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, merging is in order. The other relevant one is overlay network, although that is more about the network itself, and multicast is just one aspect of it. But this one really needs to go away if it does not get improved - it has had seven years of chances. W Nowicki (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Brian Hayles

message: 48 is pretty young - any information on the cause of his death ? -- Beardo (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Brian Hayles has a son Mark Hayles MordantFan (talk) 02:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Hayles life... 

message: Brian taught art at Greenmore College,Edgbaston and had an art gallery in Mosley,Birmingham. Sadiesox (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian Hayles
Talk:Management by observation

message: I am not yet satisfied with this article. It still needs more references. Perhaps this could be combined with Management by objectives article?
Yaz 08:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not yet satisified

message: * Styles of Management by Bud Ham
I am not sure if Bud Ham's podcast is suitable for this article. Perhaps there is another article that is better? He talks more broad subject than Management by observation versus management by objectives. To me his talking about the authoritarian early industrial revolution era management style where the manager was telling workers WHAT to do, WHEN to do it, and HOW to do it. Now how can we connect that to management by observation? 
My approach here is this: Bud Ham talks about levels of decision making. He gives example of a receptionist at doctor's office having to make decision on whether to take a patient at 4 o'clock or delay it for tomorrow versus having a team meeting to make this decision or asking the boss about this. 
How he begins the podcast is interesting, how what are characteristics of good leaders, and how this has changed from time to time.
Yaz 22:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Videos about management and decision making