Talk:Leung Ting

message: Why isn't the paragraph about alleged assault and beating of a girlfriend not in controversies section? I've read several articles, mostly in chinese, and it seems to be a "He said, She said" kind of situation. They way it is worded it seems that one party is guilty over the other, and I didn't get that feeling from any of the articles I read. Who is to say one is correct over the other. It is possible she was trying to con him out of money. The fact is that no one will ever know the truth on that situation. I've seen text messages from Leung Ting's cell phone in chinese newspapers backing up his claim, while another claims she merely beaten for no reason. I think that those sentences should be worded differently if we are going to be adding personal information. At least be non-biased.
Oh I'd also like to add how it is great that all of the wing chun schools get along and never bash each other. (Sarcasm) Its like we are killing each other's success as a whole. Together we all set an image of our art, no matter how you spell it. Ponsau (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assault of Girlfriend

message: Hello, this page has a lot of ongoing controversies and disputes. From now on, please add controversies to that section of the article. It's also very important that anything you add has a source or citation that can be checked by other editors and visitors to wikipedia. Please try to be neutral and avoid violating any wikipedia guidlines such as conflict of interest. Feel free to write whatever you want in the talk page, but unless it is non-POV and can be sourced do not add it to the article. Thanks! --Mista-X 01:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What matters isn't what you believe about the veracity of the lineage of Leung Ting, only what is expressed by reliable sources. And there aren't many sources stronger in English language CMA circles than Kung Fu Magazine, which is referenced for Leung's lineage. If you have reliable sources refuting his claims please feel free to share them. Simonm223 (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies and Disputes

message: The lineage of Leung Ting is not a legitimate conspiracy. It is verifiable that he was the last closed door student of Yip Man, and also that he was never kicked out of a wing chun school. A perfect documented example of this is when yip man attended the first open show of wing tsun and free fight tournament held in November 1969 as an honorable guest to Leung Ting. This event was the first and only time Grandmaster Yip Man attended an open show by any of his followers. The two men held a very close relationship until Yip Man's death in 1972. -- added by 74.135.6.194 on 23:36, 16 November 2006
From what I've heard from my current chief instructor in my martial arts school, I was told that Leung Ting was taught the entire Wing Chun system, and that the Wing Tsun variation was the "complete art," while the sixty-five other students only understood a portion of the lessons they were given. Note: This is what I merely heard.
Pretty detailed for something 'merely heard'. Still hearsay only and you don't name your source for verificaton. Yip Man never attended any other open show because none of his other students would be shameless enough to officially invite him to such a rather disgraceful event. This is a matter of face, a very delicate affair in chinese culture.
Just by the way, Chu Shong-tin, 3rd student of Yip Man and his only indoor student (they lived together), is still alive today and could be asked.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.104.199 (talk) 12:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Truth about Yip Man and Leung Ting's Relationship, not the complete nonsense typed below

message: Questions about his linage from Yip Man is a well-known controversy in the martial art world and on the Internet.  Whether he is authenitic Wing Tsun is a matter of NPOV.  However, the existence of the controversy is fact that worth mentioning.  The mention of the controversy is repeatedly removed from the article and this talk page.  Is this censorship in wikipedia???  Kowloonese 22:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was pretty sure he was a student of Leung Sheung, but I admit I can't remember the reference. He is involved heavily with the VTAA, so I don't think anything implying he didn't study somewhere under Yip Man belongs here as credible. Rpf 14:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: doubtful linage

message: Consensus of a  discussion on merging Wing Tsun to Wing Chun  was that it is better to merge style specific information into the founder of Wing Tsun's article with an opportunity for further discussion.  This would keep it in line with other styles of Wing Chun and also avoid the huge overlap of information currently in the Wing Tsun article with Wing Chun.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge Wing Tsun to Leung Ting 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leung Ting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206072532/http://vingtsun.virtue.nu/ to http://vingtsun.virtue.nu/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140301194302/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=90856&sid=26157181&con_type=1&d_str=20091120&isSearch=1&sear_year=2009 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=90856&sid=26157181&con_type=1&d_str=20091120&isSearch=1&sear_year=2009
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion