lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Every Second Counts (album)

message: I am deleting some spam that someone put.--216.81.36.194 19:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Says in the main page of plain white t's that it as re released on this album - yet the track listing does not show it..i need moar explaination Atroso 09:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey there delilah 
Talk:Simin Daneshvar

message: If using a published translation, quotes and references should use the spelling in the referenced resource.  If there are errors in spelling/transliteration, they should be pointed out separately and the reasoning behind the assessment of error should be noted.  One assumes that translators do significant research before publishing a translation (though they are hardly perfect), so any disagreement with a published source should be well supported.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.128.98.58 (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title/spelling (transliteration)
Talk:Everybody's in Show-Biz

message: The 2022 reissue should be mentioned, e.g. see https://theseconddisc.com/2022/07/27/celluloid-heroes-the-kinks-combine-muswell-hillbillies-everybodys-in-show-biz-on-new-box/ 31.190.113.66 (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 reissue
Talk:Simo Frangén

message: A stupid error, no doubt accidental, by User:Monegasque five years ago, made the article claim - for a period of five years - that Frangén was born in 1983, not in 1963. If you read through the article text, you would have seen it claim that Frangén marticulated (graduated from high school) one year before his birth, and graduated from university with a master's degree at the age of seven. Why was I the only one to notice this in five years? JIP | Talk 19:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How come no one noticed this?
Talk:Kidder fight

message: I correct the category from just plain :Category:Massacres to the more specific :Category:Massacres by Native Americans.
I wonder if this should really be called a massacre since they killed enemy combatants which seems to fall outside of the Webster's definition:
:the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty 
Or is this is case of it originally being referred to as a "massacre" by their enemies of the time (propoganda), in which case the massacre should be put in inverted commas?
--Deon Steyn 11:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no way it wouldn't be a massacre unless you applied double standards.  Every single member of the party was killed.  Think about that for a minute.  There's not a chance each of those guys was killed with a headshot while firing gallantly at his attackers.  Several wounded must have been put to death after the Indians took control of the position.71.129.81.136 14:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Absolutely. Take a look at the Wiki article on the Sand Creek Massacre (which, btw, had some survivors). Theres numerous examples from both sides - as with most wars... Engr105th (talk) 02:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massacre? 
Talk:Simon Ammann

message: It'd be good if someone could add how he did in the 2006 Olympics. Tad Lincoln (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 

message: Fisher? Really? It seems it's ELAN. --Bilderling (talk) 08:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ski brand
Talk:Simon Atkins (footballer)

message: It's a matter of public record that the Fitzroy Football Club still plays in its own right, albeit not in the AFL - now in the VAFA - and is not a part of the Brisbane Lions. Hence any claim that Fitzroy no longer competes as a club and somehow merged with Brisbane is not correct.
What is true is that Brisbane took over the AFL operations. As detailed by Fitzroy on the club's website (http://www.fitzroyfc.com.au), and within Wikipedia itself for a long time now in the entry about the Fitzroy Football Club (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitzroy_Football_Club). And both the club website and that Wikipedia entry clearly show that Fitzroy still exist and compete as a club on the field.
Since Fitzroy obviously still exist as a club, both on and off the field, it is false to claim that somehow 1996 was the club's last season, and also false, for instance, to say that Atkins was the club's last goalscorer. So I've corrected these points.
121.210.232.42 (talk) 13:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors of fact corrected about Fitzroy in this article
Talk:Simon Bainbridge

message: The photo is of Bret Dean and not Simon Bainbridge!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.29.141 (talk) 14:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not of the correct Simon Bainbridge back in 2015, that's true.  But it was not Brett Dean either.  Anyhow the correct image is in the article now. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

message: I can't find any song called 'Spirogyra' written by Simon Bainbridge. Not in discogs, not in 45cat, not in repertoire.bmi.com ? 2001:56A:FA85:3800:80AA:59D2:4294:4315 (talk) 19:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a song, it's for instrumental ensemble. First performed in this 1971 concert at Aldeburgh. It later became one of Bainbridge's Three Pieces for Chamber Ensembles, premiered in 1983. --94.197.152.246 (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You can also find it on YouTube here. --94.197.152.246 (talk) 13:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Spirogyra

message: I made two edits to the "External links" section. One was to replace the obsolete link to Chester Novello with a working link to Wise Music Classical, which took over Chester Novello. The other was to the UYMP link: I didn't change the URL but expanded the text to make it clear where the link went. Both my edits were almost immediately reverted without explanation, and the editor sent me a talk page message accusing me of non-constructive editing. I asked why they thought my edits were not constructive, and received no reply, even though I can see the editor has since been active editing other pages. I'm going to make the changes again, because I believe they are constructive, but if I have made a mistake I hope someone will have the courtesy to explain what I have done wrong rather than just sending passive-aggressive messages making unjustified accusations. --94.197.152.246 (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Simon Black

message: There is yet another celebrity by that name.  If you put that name in Google, you get results also for a political celebrity.  2601:1:9280:155:B0E9:79A1:FFDA:649E (talk) 23:47, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Simon Blackburn

message: Why does Blackburn have the "atheist" label before his name? Is this something that Blackburn emphasizes about himself? I'm sure that there are several atheist mathematicians and scientists, but we don't begin their Wikipedia articles by saying things like "Godel was an athiest mathematician" unless that label has some kind of significance to the way they portrayed themselves. As far as I know, Blackburn is not an outspoken atheist. So discussion of his atheism may best be left to a new section in his article titled something like Religious Views. As it is, this label seems like flamebait from someone religious or ammunition from someone who is an atheist. Either way, it makes a much bigger deal out of Blackburn's atheism than Blackburn himself does. Clan-destine (talk) 00:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Atheist Label
Talk:Simon Poulsen

message: *He is of mixed Black African and Danish origin so stop removing it Spiderone (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As you know, Wikipedia's policy on adding categories to biographies of living people requires all categories to be backed up by sourced facts appearing in the article in question. There are no such sourced facts in Simon Poulsen's article, so the category is inappropriate. Struway2 (talk) 09:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed race
Talk:Viognier

message: As far as I know, terpenes are not floral in nature, but "terpentine"-like.  Anyone have more detail here? --Wikifleur (moved by 70.171.13.219 21:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion on GuildSomm has more info. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 23:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terpenes 

message: Viognier is grown South Africa as well, at least by Zonnebloem Wines of Stellenbosch. Unfortunately I don't have more detailed information regarding areas etc. Could someone add this to the article? 
BTW: Zonnebloem recommends it as well with seafood dishes --Kinibaai (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional production
Talk:Simon Charlton

message: Four different users have now tried to add the fact that Simon Charlton played for the Sealand national football team to the infobox on his article, citing this article from the BBC. The text does not mention Charlton but I have not watched or listened to the video, so I don't know if he's mentioned. Be that as it may, IMO this was not a serious fixture and should not be added to the infobox. Any thoughts?  --  Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Derek Stillie has had this info added too -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be treated like any other "nation" not recognized by FIFA. If those are included, this should be too, as the NF-Board, who seems to be the next official thing, recognized this match. -Koppapa (talk) 12:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently Mr Charlton captained the side..... In my opinion, any "governing body" that accepts membership from an attention-seeker representing a fort in the sea with a resident population of 3 whose football association advertises for members of the public worldwideto write in and apply to be a second-half substitute in a supposed "international" match under said governing body's control, loses any possible credibility. I hope the ground where the match was played made a few quid behind the bar, but DK has it correct, it's not a serious fixture and shouldn't be in the infobox. A sentence in the prose is fine, but that's all. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an official NF-Board recognised match. I don't know what that means in terms of notability but looking at players of other NFB "national" teams, there's about a 50-50 split to whether their caps are mentioned in the infobox. BigDom 14:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of what we normally do with NF-Board countries, I don't have a problem in removing Sealand from the infobox as aspecial case. We are after all talking about a country with no grass or artificial turf, and a population of fewer than 11 people. —WFC—  16:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Simon Charlton and [[Sealand national football team]]
Talk:Exotic Birds and Fruit

message: The introductory paragraph states "Of special note is the release of the album in Argentina..." Why is this "of special note?" An explanation would be helpful. If it's just a comment made by an Argentine fan, I suggest moving this sentence into one of the subsidiary sections below, as this factoid doesn't appear to rise to the level of "interesting for everyone to read as part of the introductory paragraph." B. Polhemus (talk) 22:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release in Argentina
Talk:Simon Clifford

message: What was he doing before starting his coaching career? The article starts "Once back in England" - where had he been and what had he been doing?   --Daemonic Kangaroo 08:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early career 

message: The page about Loftus says he's from there.
So, is he? Francis Hannaway 11:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middlesbrough or Loftus? 

message: Most of this article is anecdotal and is poorly referenced. Simon Clifford lacks notability and perha[s should be deleted from Wikipedia. Francis Hannaway (talk) 20:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable person - delete? 
Talk:Simon Conway Morris

message: Simon Conway Morris is now Emeritus Professor (see Professor Simon Conway Morris). אביהו (talk) 17:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article need updating
Talk:Grüner Veltliner

message: * Regarding production in the United States it is also being produced in Oregon by Reustle Prayer Rock Vineyards.Rex-Johnson, Braiden (November 9th, 2008). "Wine & Spirits 2008". The Seattle Times. Uncubed (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Consider including...
Talk:Simon Day

message: "in which his acting in the role as ferryman on the Thames was directly responsible for each of the eight Oscars the film gathered". I laughed out loud at that, and didn't have the heart to revert it. Good show. ElectricRay (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Shakespeare in love]]

message: I'm just listening to MidWeek on Radio4, and Simon Day is talking about his life.  Turns out it's quite interesting, he's got ADHD, he spent time in a borstall, and was homeless.  Lots of stuff, which I was surprised to see haven't really been discussed much on the internet.  
My question is how do I reference that stuff, if I put a synopsis of the interview, on the Simon Day page?  Clearly I can't reference it to anything which can easily be verified (accepting that this episode of midweek will be on iplayer for the next week).  How do we handle TV or Radio references in wikipedia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibaz (talk • contribs) 08:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio 4 interview (on Midweek 22/06/2011)
Talk:Simón Díaz

message: I have a problem with sourcing extremely positive information about Mr. Díaz with a link to his own web-page. The official home-page is a place for promotion, and should not be taken as a independent source of neutral reliable information. --Damiens.rf 13:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you mean about "extremely positive information" about Mr. Diaz,  the content sourced by his WP:SELFPUB website is in no way "unduly self-serving" nor does it violate any of the criteria specified by WP:SELFPUB.  Considering the verifiable sources and history of Dias, the sourced content is very modest; after all, he's not claiming to be bigger than Elvis or to have written all the songs the Beatles sang, or that he's the King of all media...claims like those would be unduly self-serving comments - but not what's currently sourced.  Diaz's WP:SELFPUB website is perfectly fine for that content.  Dreadstar ☥ 17:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "history of Dias"? And I don't agree you need to claim to be bigger than Elvis to be considered unduly self-serving. --Damiens.rf 18:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-published sources 

message: Hi. I guess I don't fully understand how this site works. How am I supposed to see who recorder Mr. Díaz songs from this link? Thanks, --Damiens.rf 19:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last.fm 
Talk:Simon Estes

message: The lower half of this sure looks like it's been copied from somewhere.  Style is like a blurb from
a program guide or webpage. Allansteel 07:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A copy? 

message: Estes was arrested in Queensland, Australia on the 3rd August 1974. The charge being he was a "wanted aboriginal." 
Source: Canberra times 30 Aug 1974 page 3. Leveni 10:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrest
Talk:Simon Fraser, 16th Lord Lovat

message: I've added six sources to the article so the BLPProd is now invalid. Only one of them (the Scotsman reference) would count as SIGCOV by my analysis though. Part of the issue with finding sources is that there were two clan chiefs who forfeited the title, hence the 16th 18th Lord thing, and searching for references for "16th Lord Lovat" brings up references for Simon Fraser, 14th Lord Lovat, (who would be 16th if the two forfeited clan chiefs are counted) CiphriusKane (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD
Talk:Simon Frith

message: Can we add a chapter on Marxism and Russel brand? 58.177.129.99 (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marxism
Talk:Simon Garner

message: I have undone revision 803066971 by Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:3BAB:D300:D1D2:C359:2BA0:EECE. It deleted some valid, sourced information. However it also added some new information. The problem is that this new information is unsourced and not very well worded. I have included it here in case someone else wants to verify it, reword it, and put it back in the "personal life" section of the entry.
"Garner has 4 children, 2 working and 2 in school. John Garner, James Garner, Thomas Garner, Martha Garner. His Atwood youngest (Thomas and Martha) both are still in school but have maher sporting interests, Thomas has followed the path of his dad and taken up football and Martha is a county athlete and plays netball. She also is interested in football. And Garner's two oldest sons (John and James) both work together high up in a company."
SMeeds (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family information removed from article could be sourced and reworked =
Talk:Simon Goodwin

message: I found :Image:Adelaide90s.png and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Adelaide90s.png]]
Talk:Simon Grayson

message: I really don't see the point of including a 3-point graph  for Grayson's finishes whilst manager of Blackpool. For one, a plot with so few data points doesn't really add much, and the image is so small when in the article that you can't read the numbers. Where is the context? If such a graph is to be included it should be as a continuation of Blackpool's finishes over the years otherwise we don't know if the finishes in Grayson's tenure are higher, lower, or about the same as previously. Additionally, there's no cut-off points between the different divisions, it's not clear as to the precise finishing position, and the top of the position scale is 0! I did delete this image but it was reinstated, so I thought I'd start a discussion about it. Dancarney (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your opinion. The prose can probably be enhanced to accompany the graph more fluently, and I can jazz up the graph. While I'm not sure I can replace "0" with "1" at the top of the axis, I can do it in Photoshop instead of Excel. Your reasons don't justify its exclusion, that's for sure. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 11:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, and you haven't answered my point about context. Additionally, the graph only goes down to 50th place - there are 72 teams in the Football League. Dancarney (talk) 12:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I don't see any reason why not to use it. It's a useful complementary addition to the text. Peanut4 (talk) 13:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I cropped it to include only the relevant positionings. Are you saying you'd like an even larger version of a graph you don't really want in the first place? - Dudesleeper /  Talk 13:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm preparing for any compromises! Only including the "relevant postionings" robs a graph of context - the article Wikipedia:Don't draw misleading graphs summarises reasonably why the y axis scale is important. Dancarney (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having just looked at my source Excel file, it appears I didn't crop the graph at all. Excel rounded down to 50 from 43. If you have the time to work out how to expand the graph down to 72, I'll be happy to e-mail it to you. I don't. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 14:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tap, tap. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 00:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right click on the axis, select 'Format Axis', and then set the maximum as 72 and minimum as 1. Dancarney (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can only get "71" to appear as the maximum, even when "72" is typed in (see updated graph). I'll have a further fiddle when I get a chance. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 02:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackpool graph 
Talk:Simon R. Green

message: Who is he, why is he in this article, and what's going on here? Maxvip 16:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC
)
Just somebody with the same name, I think it should be removed. Perryn 23:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon CHARLES Green? 

message: This is almost start-class, but I have made it stub-class, as it has no references at all. Moonraker (talk) 10:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment