lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of rail accidents (2000–2009)

message: Shouldn't the page be renamed 'Rail disasters', because accidents can usually mean there is nobody to blame. If someone intentionally causes a disaster, such as the London Underground bombings, then saying it's a disaster could be offensive to those who just survived, or to families of those who died in bombings. You don't call 9/11 an 'accident' do you? Just making my point here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.125.225.224 (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorism Acts 
Talk:A Little South of Sanity

message: Could someone provide the dates? AmericanLeMans (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: The formatting is different between Disc 1 and Disc 2 for this album. I'd try to fix the template myself but I'd probably screw it up! Eegorr (talk) 11:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something wrong with Track Listing template?
Talk:Staples Inc.

message: Sycamore should probably count as the parent company instead of the owner because of how Parent companies work. WiinterU (talk) 13:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The main difference I've been able to find between a holding company and a parent company is that parent companies generally have operations of their own while also owning a majority share in the owned company, while holding companies generally do not have any other operations other than holding the stocks of the companies they own. In this sense, Sycamore Partners is more of a holding company than a parent company. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sycamore Partners relation to Staples Inc.
Talk:Corporate crime

message: I am unsure if Corporate crime should be me merged with Corporate abuse or be left alone; either way some sort of correlation exists and needs to be addressed.  For now I will only place a sublink to both places.
Also SEE: |Category:Corporate abuse|
what should be the proper action?
RoboAction 04:48, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: The Monsanto article links to corporate terrorism, which redirects to this page. But the page is entirely vacant of any such content. Ken 16:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate terrorism? 

message: There's no such word as "socialogy" in the first line of "what penalties to impose."  Stars4change (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No word socialogy

message: I propose that Organi-cultural deviance be merged into Corporate crime, on the grounds that the former is barely notable by itself, and both pages would benefit from the context of being together. There was a stale proposal to merge the former to White-collar crime, but this seems to be a better destination. For starters, "Organi" in this context is short for "Organization". The incoming page discusses the rationale for some forms of corporate crime. Klbrain (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Given no objections in almost 2 years,  Klbrain (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in  

message: "Corporate Fraud" redirects here. That is equivalent?
If it is the same, we would like to mention this term (with bold) in the lead. If not, please somebody define that too. :) Madacs (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate Fraud? 

message: — Assignment last updated by User78632 (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Legal Research

message: Does this section of this article give "undue weight" to the concept of "organi-cultural deviance?" Jarble (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, somewhat; but at least it's referenced, and being at the bottom of the article doesn't seem intrusive to the more important content earlier. Klbrain (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Undue weight"
Talk:Bazooka Tooth

message: Any idea how he got the name for this album?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.107.165.193 (talk) 22:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Labour power

message: Frankly, this section is miserably poor. I am sure that classical economists have made better critiques of Marx's concepts than merely accusing him of lack of originality, of vagueness, etc.
Hasn't Boehm-Bawerk made a thoroug critique of Das Kapital? Perhaps that should be used, instead of van der Linden's tautologies? Ninguém (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of the concept of labour power 

message: One reference for the entire article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 19:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of references 

message: Still a lack of references. «Labour power … is a key concept used by Karl Marx…». Marxism demands new developments in a changing world, based on Marxist concepts. But Wikipedia in not the place for personal research (Wikipedia:No original research). The parts about the theory of Marx himself need more references. Many very long developments in the page are modern without any reference. This is a difficult situation. I do not feel allowed to suppress 4/5 of the page, contents that exist since quite a long time. Part of it is interesting. It is up to the authors to provide references or to cut their OR. --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 08:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 
Talk:2001 Australian federal election

message: The total number of senate seats listed here is 80.  Shouldn't it be 76? -- Chuq 05:57, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 80 Senate seats?

message: Can this article remain on the page? --Celco85Celco85 (talk) 11:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Two conditions - should be formatted correctly which it was not and the reason for its inclusion should be shown clearly which again it was not. Hence it was deleted. How many times have we now suggested that you should format references correctly?Fleet Lists (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have since again read the reference and I believe it is a good one but it must meet the two criteria above for it to be included in the article so that it does not reduce the quality of the article.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this?
Talk:Bergisch Gladbach

message: Added a table for twin towns. Radiofoot89 (talk) 03:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hallo Radiofoot89, nice table, this is the official Site. Where did you find Oro-Station Canada? --Curo (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Twin Towns

message: The information relating to the "Bergisch" part of the name contradicts the German Wikipedia entry, which I judge to be more accurate. According to this, and to most local literature, the prefix "Bergisch" was added in 1863 specifically to distinguish the town from Mönchengladbach. Whether it comes directly from the Counts of Berg or from the region to which they gave their name (the Bergisches Land) comes down to the same thing in the end. But it clearly means "Gladbach in the Bergisches Land". Escoville (talk) 10:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Will be contiunued, and add fotos.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 23:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Personality
Talk:Joker (character)

message: "Finger produced an image of actor Conrad Veidt in character as Gwynplaine" -> "Finger used an image of actor Conrad Veidt as Gwynplaine." Rationale: Finger did not produce the photo. He just happened to have the photo of Gwynplaine. Also, "in character" is not needed here. The context is quite clear. 2600:6C44:117F:95BE:485B:151D:5673:182B (talk) 07:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2023 

message: Why is only "Red Hood" listed? Is this alias more notable than the Martha Wayne one for some reasons? Redjedi23 (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable aliases 

message: The redirect Joe Kerr has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  – Muboshgu (talk) 01:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Joe Kerr]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Wei (state)

message: There is no mention of its early history: it was one of the three states that were once the Spring and Autumn state of Jin 晉. This is very important information.Bao Pu (talk) 12:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I came across this page: Kingdom of Wei
Wouldn't it be better to make one article instead of two??
Quibus 11:25, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The two are definitely not the same thing. Kingdom of Wei has since been moved to Cao Wei for clarity. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 01:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingdom of Wei 

message: Need dates of this kingdom in the lead paragraph. Badagnani 01:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates of kingdom

message: Speaking of dates, this edit established the page's usage as AD/BC. Kindly maintain it consistently pending a new consensus. Yes, the scholarship tends to use it; no, it's still not anything like as common. — LlywelynII 15:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:ERA]]
Talk:Emmanuel Henri Victurnien de Noailles

message: Would this be the fellow who was serving as ambassador to Germany during the Fashoda crisis? john k 06:35, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, but it wouldn't be surprising.  I came across him as one of the advocates of a 1895 mosque project in Paris (part of my dissertation research) -- the stimulus to sorting out the Noailles family was my trying to figure out who the hell this Noailles, ambassadeur de France was...  Do you have a reference to a Noailles at that time? --Tkinias 09:56, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Restoration Movement

message: Hope the clarification about restoration churches and Protestantism adds light, not heat. If there is disagreement, please discuss here. Thanks! The Editrix 21:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protestantism clarification 

message: I found this category after following a link from Millerites to Restoration Movement.  I changed the link to Restorationism since it is the page that has something to do with Miller.  I imagine that this confusion happens a lot.
At the top of this category's page it is explained that these are two different movements that have nothing to do with each other.  Fine, but where on the Christianity Branches image does this restoration (the -movement one) belong?  The explanation makes me think it is part of protestantism, but the name automatically puts it in with restorationism.  Please make this clear in the explanation at the top of the category page.—Red Baron 19:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  <big>R</big> -movement versus -ism
Talk:Halo 3

message: In the article, it states that Halo 3 is the "second best selling game in the Halo franchise," but no credible source (at least none that are up-to-date) reaffirms this claim. According to the article, List of best-selling video games, Halo 3 has sold 14+ million units and is far ahead in sales than any Halo game before and after it. Can anyone change this line? Thank you. 2602:306:C5B4:4B79:4578:671B:6864:6A35 (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the second best selling game in the Halo franchise" 

message: It's been announced by 343 that this game, along with three others, will be made backwards compatible on the Xbox One.
https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/news/halo-summer-celebration
(anonymous user) 21:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Backwards compatibility

message: Currently the lead has range of refs which violates MOS:CITELEAD. Does anyone have any objections before I remove them?  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 16:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to make sure those are cited in the body. If you're just pulling stuff for compliance without double-checking, I'd ask that you refrain. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I was planning on transferring the refs to the main body (assuming they were stated there). Although, you have already done it so thank you.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: The game contains a plethora of Easter Eggs (hidden clues and left in the final product by the game developers).
Othoninio (talk) 10:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Easter eggs generally are not considered notable and worth including unless there's reliable sources discussing them in detail. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 16:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easter Eggs 

message: Halo 3 Xbox servers were officially shut down on January 13th 2022. 2604:2D80:E599:1B00:605D:2C6D:1FAA:7ED6 (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Comment: There's a few recent articles available via a quick Google search; here's one example. — Manticore 23:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Integrated ref. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 14:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2022 

message: It is my understanding that the alternate reality game "I Love Bees" was a product of the marketing for "Halo 2", not this game. Avatartuna (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you follow the content in the Release section and related article you'll find more information. "I Love Bees" was the ARG for Halo 2, but Halo 3 had its own one as well. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Marketing included… alternate reality game.”
Talk:Ribbon cable

message: The article says, "Brown is pin 1 or pin 11 or pin 21 etc. Red is pin 2 or pin 12 or pin 22 etc." in the first paragraph. However, the caption by the picture says, "Left: 20-way grey ribbon cable with wire no. 1 marked red." Also, if you go to  this website, in the fourth paragraph it says, "Red means Pin 1." Can someone please clear this up for me? --Leo628 15:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: you aren't reading the article correctly "The order of colors in a rainbow colored cable is the same as the electronic color code. (Brown is pin 1 or pin 11 or pin 21 etc. Red is pin 2 or pin 12 or pin 22 etc.)" (emphasis added). --Plugwash  15:37, 19:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I think you have highlighted a problem with the opening paragraph. In my opinion it is too long and uses a rather confusing writing style.  The information about colors could and should be rewritten as a separate paragraph later in the article. -- Nick 15:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Good idea; it seems much easier to read now. --Leo628 20:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is red pin 1 or is brown pin 1? 

message: The whole history section of the article sounds like an advertisement for Cicoil in my opinion. 84.251.1.46 (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Is this cable not also known as IDE cable? Not sure what it stands for, perhaps Interface Device Extension?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.157.241 (talk) 03:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Although the cable shown in the photo at the top of the article is probably an IDE cable, any cables, including SATA, USB 3.0 and audio cable, can be manufactured as ribbon cables.202.73.1.98 (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also known as IDE Cable?
Talk:Septum pellucidum

message: I do not see the difference between the names given at the beggining of the page, except for capital P is that the reason for "also named"?
------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.25.94 (talk) 12:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

message: Medial septum redirects here, but the medial septum should have its own page based on stuff like this
http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/short/28/8/1841
How Do I remove the redirect so the page can be made???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.12.175 (talk) 10:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will change the Redirect to Medial_septal_nucleus which is a synonym for medial septum. - 67.224.51.189 (talk) 19:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Big problem

message: The text as of 28th August 2012 says the Cavum Septum Pellucidum does not contain CSF which sounds very strange (if not CSF what is it) and cites a reference but I couldn't information in the citation which backed this up. Further more the internal ref to cavum septum pellicidum says CSP does contain CSF so I am going to remove this statement 194.83.141.96 (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cavum Septum Pellucidum contains no CSF? 

message: Would it make good sense to replace the last sentence in the last paragraph of the septum pellucidum Structure section with, "The term fifth ventricle now refers to the terminal enlargement of the central canal in the spinal cord.[5]" ? (Retaining the existing wiki-links as indicated.)
It had been, "The fifth ventricle is recognised as the terminal ventricle in the spinal cord.[5]"
I ask because the original wording confused me for a space of time, as it followed a statement about the cavum having previously been referred to as the fifth ventricle, and given that the rest of the ventricles are in the brain, and this one is at the end of the spinal cord, & is also not usually mentioned in reference to the ventricular system. So referring to it as the terminal enlargement rather than terminal ventricle might reduce any confusion others might have in reading this, even if it is considered a ventricle (mostly in children)?  UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 02:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @ 100% agree, and I am in favour of this sort of simplification (to a more easily understandable phrase) overall anyway. I've made the change. Let me know (or post on WT:ANAT) or ping me if you have comments on other talk pages, am keen to improve our sent of anatomy articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term "Fifth ventricle"
Talk:Samariá Gorge

message: I'm not sure you need plenty of bottled water.  I remember there being numerous natural fresh water springs along the way.  Just one plastic refillable bottle should suffice.
davidzuccaro 08:58, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Have we suddenly stepped into wikivoyage? Matthew Ferguson (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not encyclopedic
Talk:South African rand

message: It has been common knowledge since about 1985 that the original South African Rand does not, in fact, depict Jan van Riebeeck, but rather Bartholomeus Vermuyden.
Yet other than for a single mention in a single paragraph, the entire article references the depiction of Jan van Riebeeck on the notes.
If there is no objection, I am going to correct all of these mistakes in a few weeks' time. Janneman27 (talk) 05:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depictions of "Jan van Riebeeck"
Talk:Philosophical methodology

message: Article's Subject:
This article, 'Philosophical methodology', is about the methods (or procedures) applied in Philosophy. It is *not* about the use of such methods in the investigation of Philosophy itself (Metaphilosophy).
Manual of Style:
The current state of this article goes against the Wikipedia Manual of Style. The following are minimally required: (i) addition of outline structures in retractable trees and (ii) rewriting in a impersonal and non-judgmental language.
:Thanks for your suggestions. After a short look, I didn't spot any obvious problems with the text. I'm not sure what you mean by "addition of outline structures in retractable trees" and I couldn't find it at WP:MOS. Could you provide a link to the specific guideline you have in mind? Phlsph7 (talk) 07:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's Subject & Manual of Style
Talk:Kings of the Hittites

message: use :Template:Hittite king for articles on individual kings. (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near East). dab 09:12, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been replaced with a new standard of succession templates. See Template:S-start/doc. Ardric47 (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Database

message: The 1990s The major event was the explosive growth of the worldwide web.
Databases were deployed much more extensively than ever before TrikTrakSetrak (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2022 

message: If someone would please fix this inaccurate entry, and add in that there are important differences between a hard and soft real-time database. (Used in a mission and safety critical system vs. really fast.) 2603:3023:64B:4000:A142:8492:FCAD:989 (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real-time database 

message: : Did you inadvertently delete your request here? I've marked this as resolved for now - if you have a request, please reply in this section and I'll be notified. Tollens (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2023
Talk:Guillaume Du Fay

message: IP, the fact that you have neither heard of Planchart, do not have access to Grove music online and are continuously edit-warring, makes it difficult to take anything you say about a Renaissance composer seriously. You arguments are complete WP:OR, in that you are using no reliable secondary sources to support them, this a tertiary encyclopedia. You reference the 'Verifiability' page, but this page literally says . The Grove article says "(b Beersel, Aug 5, 1397; d Cambrai, Nov 27, 1474). French composer and theorist. He was acknowledged by his contemporaries as the leading composer of his day. He held positions in many of the musical centres of Europe and his music was copied and performed virtually everywhere that polyphony was practised". I do not know why you think it is productive to continously revert something that is supported by reliable sources. On Wikipedia, I don't care where Du Fay was born, I care what sources call him, and here he is called French. Aza24 (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP nonsense 

message: The claim "instruments were certainly used for some of his secular music, especially for the lower parts; all of his sacred music is vocal. Instruments may have been used to reinforce the voices in actual performance for almost any of his works" is highly contested.  It's true that by Dufay's time, this prctice seems to have been more common than previously, but there is still a lot of uncertainty here.  You need to mention the alternative view of minimal instrumental contribution voiced most popularly by Christopher Page. 73.7.121.67 (talk) 19:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  instrumental participation in performance
Talk:Economy of France

message: There has been serial vandalism of the economy pages for Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Japan, Malaysia and Morocco. The vandalism has involved repeated reversions of correct GDP data from the IMF 2023 GDP (nominal and PPP) estimates--the citations are never changed, just the figures and the denomination. For example, Germany's IMF 2023 nominal GDP estimate is USD$4.308 trillion; the edits changed it to EUR and increased it to €5.011 trillion. I have reverted these changes, all made by the same unregistered user (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:980:B601:991F:665A:31CA:ECA4). Pierrot Delecto (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism of GDP figures