lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Styx (disambiguation)

message: I'd like to start a discussion on which "Styx" article should be the main one. I think that the disambiguation page should be "main-ified," because there could be a lot of people looking for the band (like me), but I also agree that the mythological Styx river is important. Having two topics of (I'm assuming) equal interest and/or relevance indicates to me that the disambiguation page should be the main page. OverMyHead 15:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although some of the computer games are just a misspelling of 'sticks', all the others are named after the mythological river so really that should be the main article, if at all. I think more people are going to looking for that rather than the band; personally I would leave it as it is. Marasmusine 15:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree. Styx the mythological river is the basis for all the Styxes, and it is known in a wider range of English-speaking areas (crank up that Styx Fan Club in Wellington!). If you think this is really a problem, a compromise would be to change the the lead-in to: This article is about the mythological river. For the band, see Styx (band). For other uses, see Styx (disambiguation). - DavidWBrooks 19:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not move the disambiguation page to Styx? Wodup 06:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After actually reading the comments above, I guess that I would agree with OverMyHead. Wodup 06:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I concur with Marasmusine for the reasons stated. Even the band is named for the river. --DrGaellon (talk | contribs) 13:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Main page
Talk:Mere Smith

message: Hi. It's my understanding that Mere Smith was a "Buffy" fan with no previous TV writing credits, who approached Joss Whedon cold and asked him if she could work for him. I believe after some conversation he hired her as a production assistant at first, and then as a writer for "Angel" If I knew of published support for this statement I would have added it to the article myself--but I'm neither sure of the details nor do I have a source. If anyone else can provide an acceptable source for whatever the story really is, I think it would be a good addition to the article. DSatz (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting background info, but I can't document it
Talk:Peter Osgood

message: I have removed a large section of the text, which was cut-and-pasted from http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/4763322.stm. --148.122.128.41 17:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted text

message: Are the pictures from here considered fair use? Roeeyaron 23:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair Use Image

message: Shouldn't the 1964-65 League Cup be in the trophy room, as he appeared in the quarter finals against Workington and scored twice in a 2-0 win ? I think it should.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.133.0.122 (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles won 

message: The text says his leg was broken in a tackle by Blackpool's Emleyn Hughes. What actually happened was Osgood made a clumsy retaliatory challenge against Hughes and broke his own leg in the process. He also compliciated the fracture by playing golf and other physical activities, requiring it to be reset and recast 86.172.112.161 (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation to a reliable source would be helpful. 86.167.226.130 (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Leg
Talk:Stephanie Romanov

message: I'm guessing speaking a number of languages has more to do with having worked in Europe, than having "Russian heritage", given that she seems to have been born in Vegas.  If someone cvan put this in more context...  Alai 17:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Foreign dialects" 

message: She appeared on 7 Days as Olga's evil sister, not sure of the dates or titles though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meshback (talk • contribs) 06:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 Days
Talk:G-quadruplex

message: The placement and bonding to form G-quadruplexes are not random and serve very unique functional purposes. The quadruplex structure is further stabilized by the presence of a cation, especially potassium, which sits in a central channel between each pair of tetrads.[2] They can be formed of DNA, RNA, LNA, and PNA, and may be intramolecular, bimolecular, or tetramolecular. Since there was no page for tetramolecular I decided to take out the function of navigating to a link that wasn't there.
Crh15j (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction edit

message: Could anyone write a few lines on what these structures might actually do? At least hypothetical ideas. --David Munch (talk) 12:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a (very) brief starting point, which I intend to improve upon over the next few weeks/months Sarahburge (talk) 17:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential functions 

message: I removed the word "monovalent" from the introductory paragraph; quadruplexes can happily form with divalent cations; calcium and strontium cations have both been seen in quadruplexes. Sarahburge (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Monovalent cations

message: *
:Chris857 (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source 

message: I think this should be more detailed. There is an excerpt that  I found from a research article that states the following: "The building blocks of G-quadruplexes are G-quartets that are formed through a cyclic Hoogsten hydrogen-bonding arrangement of four guanines with each other. The planar G-quartets stack on top of one another forming four-stranded helical structures. G-quadruplex formation is driven by monovalent cations such as Na+ and K+, and hence physiological buffer conditions favour their formation" 
Sydharrington (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoogsteen Hydrogen Bonding

message: After reading the a majority of the article "G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology" from Daniela Rhodes and Hans J. Lipps published in  Nucleic Acids Research, I found that it would make a great external link for people to go. It provides clear and concise examples that was very helpful in understanding the structure, function and formation of the G-quadruplex. 
Daniela Rhodes, Hans J. Lipps; G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43 (18): 8627-8637. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv862
Sydharrington (talk) 22:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:Free (OSI album)

message: re:free is an EP of remixed versions of songs from Free (OSI album). I have only found two sources () which discuss the EP, which would provide enough content for a small section in this article, but not a whole article unto itself. Una LagunaTalk 11:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger from [[re:free]] 

message: One of the times for the songs is missing.  It doesn't add up properly.  I propose that the missing time is Once (6:38)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.59.108.239 (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Time 
Talk:Happy Birthday (Stevie Wonder song)

message: Other hit songs about Martin Luther King include "Pride (In The Name Of Love)" and "MLK" by U2, "Abraham, Martin & John" by Dion and "King" by UB40.
Not sure if this really belongs in the article? JuJube (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other songs about MLK
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Licorne

message: Hi, I don't mean to interfere with an arbitrarion with which I am not involved, but may I suggest that an injunction is in order to prevent Licorne from editing David Hilbert, Henri Poincaré, Albert Einstein and Friedwardt Winterberg or their talk pages while the arbitration is ongoing? In light of , perhaps it would focus his attention on the arbitration proceedings. –Joke 16:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I was informed of Licorne's statememts concerning me in this arbitration. As a matter of fact, I already slightly modified the intro on Einstein's page to become more factual, compatible with different POV's; and surely further improvement is possible.
It should however be clear from the corresponding Talk page that my opinion on how to formulate those issues significantly differs from Licorne's - as also has been regularly the case on the Poincare page. Many of his contributions I regarded as "soapbox" presentations. Note that the Poincare Talk page may serve for finding more examples of verbal abuse by Licorne. Harald88 12:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Einstein intro 

message: I think the evidence phase is reasonably filled-in now; we could have 100 times more evidence, but it would not say anything new.
I wonder what an appropriate injunction would be?
* Banning the "Licorne" uid from Wikipedia forever?
* Blocking his IP addresses until someone claims they belong to someone else?
* Injunction against Licorne editing or commenting on Einstein-related articles forever?
* Something else?
I worry a bit about how hard/easy it is to get around some of the blocks - and how much attention is needed to watch the pages to enforce it.
After all, the point of an RfA ruling SHOULD (in my opinion) be that reasonable editors can go about their work not having to spend energy on irritation and on restoring PoV edits for the umpteenth time.....
(I also wonder how long "forever" is - my soft heart quails at not believing in giving pepople a second chance - but I haven't seen all that much hope for a change of heart on Licorne's side...)
Thoughts?  --Alvestrand 06:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's an appropriate decision? 

message: Just wondering.... what does a ban on Licorne mean for his sock puppets/IP addresses?
I can see some possibilities:
* All IPs listed in the original injunction get blocked, but new ones aren't
* All IPs and new accounts that an admin thinks is Licorne get blocked
* The arbitrators have to reconsider every time he finds a new IP
The reason I worry is that if the first or last is true, I should introduce all the IP addresses I've observed Licorne using as evidence, and check carefully if there are more; if the middle one is true, we can deal with the problem when it arises. --Alvestrand 23:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does a ban imply for sock puppets?
Talk:Cornell Companies

message: I will drive by the a local Cornell unit and snap a photo for the article soon. Applejuicefool 16:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These automatically redirect, so click stop as soon as the pages load!
http://www.cornellcompanies.com/pages/legal.html
http://www.cornellcompanies.com/pages/contact.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 13:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to Cornell pages
Talk:Sons and Daughters (band)

message: I have rewritten this, as it was unnecessarily jumbled. I have not added any information as such, and have removed references to 'Ben Goldberg' and 'Andy Miller' as it was unclear what role these people played in the release of Love the Cup - is Goldberg the owner of Ba Da Bing Records? If so who is Andy Miller? If anyone knows more about this than me, please re-insert it!
Also, it'd be useful if we could add a section on gigs and touring (beyond 'they once played in a small club in Glasgow'). 
In the idlewild songs it claims to have Ailidh's name in the chorus, its clearly the word alibi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.178.160.170 (talk) 06:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 

message: What is this? Album and singles discography... one is in ascending chronological order, the other in descending... I suggest using the "oldest release first" strategy for both. Rather incoherent this way, which is in line with the article that looks rather cobbled-together, speaking of both "love the cup" and "the repulsion box" as their debut album, although the former was actually an EP. --afromme (talk) 22:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Talk:Zabalaza (album)

message: I've had this album for over a year, so it must have been released early than February 2006. Is that maybe the American/British release date? Joziboy 1 March 2006, 16:14 UTC
it is. i used what i assumed was the American release CD cover to corroborate. Kwaito is a relatively new phenomenon here in the states, so were a bit behind.Dlayiga 01:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Geothermal desalination

message: I'm not pleased with the proponents Web site - it's virtually impossible to make out a clear description of what their process is.  I don't *think* these guys are intentionally deceitful,  but the .PDF file on the Web site is so opaque it reminds me of the free-energy scammers. Is this stuff on the level or is it another Wikifiction? --Wtshymanski 18:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Legitimacy

message: — Assignment last updated by 1namesake1 (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WRIT 340 for Engineers - Fall 2022 - 66838
Talk:Random humour

message: the last couple of sentences of this article are not very well worded at all, and should be changed. Saccerzd 20:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

message: This entry states that "The use of randomly made statements or actions to cause humour is a relatively new form. It comes about in relation to societys generally shorter attention span and its main use stems from American television, though British television has followed recently.". Can some evidence of this be supplied? 
I think there is a long history of 'Random humour' in British comedy (Goon Shows, Peter Cook, Monty Python, Morecambe & Wise, The Young Ones, Vic & Bob, Eddie Izzard, Chris Morris) and if anything it is stems from UK comedy and has recently appeared on US television (at least in the English speaking world). 
I suspect this kind humour is actually as ancient as any other, but television obviously isn't. --WhizzBang 16:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Random humour' recent?
Talk:Lily McBeth

message: Is this teacher notable enough to be on Wikipedia? There are many transgendered teachers. What makes Lily McBeth notable? -- ConDem 16:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2006

message: I would like to see confirmation that this is even true, like a link to something on the school district web site.  Drudge Report showed this story last week, with a picture, and then this week showed a story of a gender-reassigned firefighter who looked, to me, suspiciously similar.  I know some people like to get the media taken in with hoax stories.  I'm not saying it's not true, but I would like some confirmation other than media outlets repeating stories they heard elsewhere. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification 

message: The article reads like a vanity piece. I've marked specific queries, deleted the copy edit template and replaced it with the balance template. Unless neutral sources can be cited to establish notablity, I'd support deletion.
--Whoosit (talk) 06:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance Template
Talk:Abdus Salam

message: The place of birth of Dr. Abdus Salam should be "Santokdas, District Sahiwal" which is in West Punjab, currently in Pakistan.
http://theor.jinr.ru/~kuzemsky/asbio.html
Mianwaheed 02:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 

message: Adding to "The First ****** Nobel Laureate directed by Anand Kamalakar appeared in 2018." The documentary was released on Netflix in October, 2019.
Source: http://kailoola.com/salam/ Theanonymouswoman (talk) 00:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Sceptre (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2019
Talk:Shai Hulud

message: simply...the best band ever
do you know anything about metalcore and post-hardcore??? No. cuz if you did you wouldnt write such idiot stuff..Shai Hulud is HARDcore
----------
So, regarding genre classification, I'm going to call into question the veracity of the AllMusic cite in this instance. They describe this band as 'positively themed', which seems a bit fishy to me, given albums and songs like "A Profound Hatred of Man", "Solely Concentrating on the Negative Aspects of Life", "Scornful Of The Motives And Virtue Of Others", "Ending The Perpetual Tragedy", etc. Shai Hulud creates deeply misanthropic music, and anything that labels this "positively themed" is not, in my view, a credible source. On top of this, the allmusic link also bills this as hardcore, which is how I understand the band, so it's certainly no evidence to remove the references to hardcore altogether. I'm leaving metalcore in the side genre list though. Thoughts, anyone? Arturus 04:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Change??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.20.104 (talk) 23:19, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  LINEUP 
Talk:American Foxhound

message: I've got a ton more Sobe here if nobody else wants to offer any. Want me to upload any? Are the attribution share-alike licensed ones OK? 
Peepe 05:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: "In 1650, Robert Brooke sailed to Crown Colony in America with his pack of hunting dogs, which were the root of several strains of American Hounds.  These dogs remained in the Brooke family for nearly 300 years."
That's a long life for a dog! Tex 18:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Updated this to read better. I will upload some pictures of damage my own foxhound has caused to a door in my house. Siesatia 04:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added picture of Middleburg Hunt foxhounds at the packclass to show foxhounds in movement. Siesatia 05:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foxhound Tempterment 

message: "Training a foxhound can be a trying experience, training a retired foxhound that grew up in a Fox Hunt can be even worse, they can be stubborn and don’t respond to negative reinforcement well."
Ugh. They don't respond well because NO ONE, not even people, responds to negative reinforcement well. Positive reinforcement is the method used by most trainers, as it is far more effective and far less likely to be used improperly and result in abused animals. :( The bit about negative reinforement should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.250.33 (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative Reinforcement
Talk:Ablative armor

message: I was under the impression that the heat sheilding on NASA's Space Shuttles was based on the ablative armour concept - does this deserve a mention? --The Great Apple 16:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Early heatshields were ablative, and to date some "disposable" heatshields still are. An ablaytive heatshield on a reusable spacecraft, however, would mean having to replace it in toto after every mission. Shimgray | talk | 19:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Shuttles 

message: A fine start, and nice mentioning the military, space, and science-fiction aspects of the topic. Could use some pictures, maybe some further details of examples in which ablative armor is used in each of these fields. Is it used at all in real-life military applications? LordAmeth 16:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMilHist Assessment

message: The grammatical term ablative is normally pronounced /'æblətɪv/ (roughly ABB-lutt-tiv), but my understanding is that the armor is usualy pronounced /əb'leɪtɪv/ (roughly ubb-LATE-tiv). Is this correct? --Iustinus 17:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The original basic description on this page was essentially a rewording of the description on Glossary.com (a listed source).  Unfortunately, the rewording was drastically inaccurate. It stated that the purpose of ablative armor is to prevent ablative damage to itself.  On the contrary: By definition, ablative armor is intended to ablate, thus preventing damage to that which it protects.  If Ablative Armor prevented ablative damage to itself, it wouldn't be very good at its job!
Originally: "Ablative armor is armor designed to negate damage or destruction to itself from the process of ablation."  
Changed to: "Ablative armor is armor which prevents damage by instead being destroyed itself through the process of ablation."
--- Eloquius (talk) 08:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction edit 
Talk:Bandicoot

message: The second paragraph is very confusingly written. I recommend starting with a cleanup of that. - Samsara contrib talk 16:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the taxobox; it is a common name, not a taxon. cygnis insignis 18:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So? That doesn't matter. There are plenty of other partial-taxon articles that get a taxobox. Reverted back. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxobox 

message: Merriam-Webster says a bandicoot is also a large rat of southern Asia, but this isn't referenced anywhere in the article. 174.20.180.51 (talk) 14:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rat bandicoot 

message: I don't have time to write these up properly, but found:
https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/livingwith/bandicoots.html
http://www.qm.qld.gov.au/Find+out+about/Animals+of+Queensland/Mammals/Common+mammals+of+south-east+Queensland/Marsupials/Northern+Brown+Bandicoot#.V7miDe3APtQ 
https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/animals-az/longnosed_bandicoot.html 
http://australianmuseum.net.au/southern-brown-bandicoot 
Wayne 13:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links, or separate article sources
Talk:Artois Hound

message: Please leave your suggestions on how to improve this article:  —Preceding unsigned comment added by P.Marlow (talk • contribs) 19:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Baron Stafford

message: Why does a search on "Earl of Stafford" redirect to the barony? It's a different title and rank, created in 1394. --Michael K. Smith 17:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming the article is correct the 2nd baron was created first earl (in 1351) so that's why the loop. Of course if there are multiple unconnected earldoms - then we will need to cover this.Alci12 23:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alta Vendita

message: I don't know really know why I'm commenting, but this article still irks me. There is no explanation about what this plot is about, aside from the vaguest of statements. There is no summary of the text, and no analysis of it, apart from the briefest of lines comparing it to Joly and the Protocols. There is no discussion of its purported authorship, nor of the reaction of the Roman Catholic Church to it. The references are to Freemasonic and fringe opinion websites. Overall, there is very little meat in this article. I suggest it is deleted or merged with Alta Vendita or Conspiracy theories or something else. It has little value by itself.--Gazzster 00:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article
Talk:Shripad Naik

message: rbi file ogfflñģ Dattatraya gang adhere walunj (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  help me for rbi work
Talk:Churchill Alemao

message: I see two years of birth. Only one could be right (or both wrong?).
Ash (talk) 06:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither date is sourced, and the link to their government biography is dead, so I've removed both dates until a reliable source is found for verification. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: It's inappropriate when you revert edits just because they are not really needed according to you, present day status of Goa must be acknowledged. Tabumd (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of edit
Talk:Jason Norrish

message: don't know why the info box isn't working... too late to debug it. The-Pope 17:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled