lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Treaty of friendship and alliance between the Government of Mongolia and Tibet

message: One year before World War I, the international situation did not allow recognition of Mongolia and Tibet independance by other nations.I think this is misleading. The much more stringent explanation is that neither Russia or the later SU nor Great Britain wanted to make a break in their relations to China over somewhat marginal areas like Tibet or Mongolia. Both Russia and GB were quite content with leaving leaving Mongolia and Tibet only de-facto independent, establishing them as strategic buffers and possibly enjoying some commercial privileges on the way. In any case, the reference to WWI seems somewhat misplaced: international recognition for Mongolia came only after 1945, for Tibet it came never. Yaan (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That phrase is trying to sugar-coat the fact that the big powers really had no interest in too many independent countries in the region. A weak China holding nominal control and permitting foreign manipulation was much more practical. In that sense I agree that it is misleading, or at least not NPOV. it is also mostly redundant to the sentence following it, so I'd suggest removing it again. --Latebird (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it now. I also removed that bit about treaties from the Qing Dynasty: the Russian-Chinese treaty of 1912 was concluded after the end of said dynasty, and the immediate effects of breaking those treaties on Russian/British interests in Tibet and Mongolia does not seem so clear - it is more probably the Russian resp, British interests within China that made Russia and Britain abstain from recognizing Mongolia's resp. Tibet's independence. Yaan (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  weaseling re. international recognition of independence
Talk:ArchiLab

message: This article was listed for deletion on 11 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/ARCHILAB. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:07, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing
Talk:Soufrière Hills

message: Hi wikiterians!
I was wanting to put a question out there about would it be better to make an individual page for the eruption that way we can differentiate from the volcano and keep the eruption page as an event,
Let me know what you think.
PascalsCalculatingHamster (talk) 11:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual eruption page 

message: Does anyone have a description of the eruptions of this volcano? I need it for a report.
Thanks!!!!!!!!! I really need this information because there is not a whole lot of sites about this particular topic.gracias!!!!! Can someone tell me if this is located along the ring of fire please. Thanks>Muchas Gracias a todos.
Here's some sources:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3687700.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/country_profiles/3666502.stm
According to various colleagues who have been or still are working on the volcano the eruptions are vulcanian eruptions. Mercalli described such eruptions as "...Sudden powerful explosions sounding like canon fire at irregular intervals..." in contrast to his description of strombolian eruptions "...Moderate explosions at regular intervals..." Mercalli built an observatory on Lipari in the Aeolian Islands to enable him to monitor the eruption that was occurring on Vulcano between 1888 and 1890.The Geologist (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: b 2405:201:35:3021:68FC:4CF1:2585:5DBF (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Eruptions

message: kind of a minor point, but that picture in the bottom right corner of the page should be moved into the text area.  im not sure how to do that, so could someone else do it instead? - Im.a.lumberjack 22:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: How long was this volcano dormant before the 1995 eruption?
abajjillion years  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.20.58 (talk) 05:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well GVP had some info on that which I've added to the article, I should probably have spent a bit more time to make the format better though. and I guess there is more detail available too. but I figure this is better than no information EdwardLane (talk) 08:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  before eruption of 1995 

message: I think that this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.20.113.2 (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mt.soufriere hills 

message: Which the title change the lead has now been changed to say this:
: The Soufrière Hills are an active, complex stratovolcano with many lava domes forming its summit ...
Obviously the name uses a plural word (Hills) but does that make the subject plural? Consider:
* The Biligirirangana Hills, commonly called BR Hills,  a hill range situated in...
* The Black Hills  a small and isolated mountain range rising from ...
* Beverly Hills  a city in ...
I really don't know what the correct usage is in this case. I'm thinking singular, since the topic IS a stratovolcano, but don't know for sure. --В²C ☎ 21:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hills are or is?
Talk:Left-Anarchism

message: This article was listed for deletion on 11 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Left anarchism. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:23, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing
Talk:Spanglish (film)

message: Whoever wrote the plot summary is seriously stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.144.182 (talk) 20:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just rewrote it. - Shaheenjim (talk) 23:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: With regards to the pronunciation of Flor, I can hear the differences in the scene, but cannot make the correct sound myself.  Are there any English words with the same “r”/“or” sound? —MJBurrage • TALK • 22:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flor’s name

message: The "Critical Reception" section says "Its proponents champion the film as a seminal, revolutionary masterpiece, breaking new ground in the areas of visual composition and sound/light resonance..." Is there a citation for this? I've never heard anyone refer to this film as a "revolutionary masterpiece," and frankly I find it a little hard to believe that anyone would.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.44.29 (talk) 12:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Reception?
Talk:Technocriticism

message: This article was listed for deletion on 11 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Technocriticism. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:31, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing

message: Well, I think that (sadly) most people in Western Europe and USA (and other higly-developped countries, too) are all becoming dependant on technology. And, as I said before, dependance is worse than independence. Someone should be free to chose. But, if you say to your pals: “I used to like computers, but, since I found the Internet, I got fed up with them…”, they will look at you as you are an idiot. That shouldn’t be like that! Thanks God, that in Eastern Europe people are still much more natural than Eastern Europeans. Well, don’t get me wrong, I like Eastern European people, but they are unable to ‘unplug’ from all that tech stuff. 213.240.234.212 08:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Include this view, please
Talk:Triple penetration

message: This article was listed for deletion on 11 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Triple Penetration. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:34, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thought as much, must not be up to Full Operating Boldness myself, right now.  Certainly a preferable policy to "the vote was close enough, so I'll do what I wanted to anyway".  Thanks, and done.  Alai 07:15, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing
Talk:Jentil

message: I don't think the article is any stub. Few more can be said abut the Jentilak, unless you want to quote the legends in its integrity or enter in speculations on their meaning: mostly those that consider the Jentilak (meaning gentiles) to be a mythification of pre-Christian Basques themselves. But that would be just a sidenote.  
Sugaar.
This could be just another pseudo racial centrism typical of the last generations of basques.But again basques are humans themselves and invented all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.218.39.167 (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Please try to seperate fact and fiction a tad more cleary, it's a bit confusing the way it is now. Shinobu (talk) 12:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's all fiction: it's a legend, like the Bible or Amateratsu, you know. --Sugaar (talk) 12:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Though I have to admit that Gerbrant has cleaned up some intrusive junk in the short time between the above two comments (just noticed). Thumbs up for Gerbrant. --Sugaar (talk) 12:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact versus fiction
Talk:Cabir (computer worm)

message: I removed some of the links in this article since they shouldn't have been in the external links section, some of them might be appropriate for references though so I'm posting them here incase anybody needs them for future reference.  Remember to cite the material properly if you use these sources. 
* Financial Times Article (June 15, 2004)
* BBC Article (June 16, 2004)
* Symbian Press Release (June 18, 2004)
* Caribe source code and author's description
* The Manual removal Of Cabir Mobile Virus
ThemFromSpace 16:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:LGP-30

message: Who designed and produced this?  Kd5mdk 21:51, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: In what sense is this "Algol-like"?! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qu1j0t3 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obviously not Algol-like in any way. However, we can't just remove that, because of WP:NOR. Anyway, the source has two problems: it's primary and the statement of an individual, based on his opinion and memory. It's invalid as a source. The second problem is that it's a dead link. At this point someone should be WP:BOLD and just remove the incorrect claim. David Spector 02:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACT-III 

message: The article says, "...acting as if the binary point was on the left side of the word as opposed to the right side as most other computers assume." This sounds to me like fractional multiplication (retaining the most significant bits of the result), as opposed to integer multiplication (retaining the least significant bits of the result). I can't add this, because it is WP:OR. I'm not sure how to find a reference. David Spector 01:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fractional multiplication
Talk:Liberty Belle (comics)

message: On April 11, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Liberty Belle for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:54, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) MaterialWorks (contribs) 11:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Liberty Belle (comics) →  – The title does not follow Wikipedia's naming conventions. NeoBatfreak (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Try again...  (t/c) 00:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 March 2023
Talk:S-5 rocket

message: I'm not sure of caliber 55mm. It is always quoted as 57mm rocket.. Pibwl 22:23, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've tracked it down. Jane's mentions it in Jane's Air Launched Weapons Issue 36. It still seems a little wierd though. Megapixie 14:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction to my previous post: not always. In a Polish book about military rockets from the 70s, although it didn't give any details about Soviet top secret weapons, but it is quoted as 55 mm rocket. Pibwl ←« 21:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Calibre

message: The article currently says the S-5 is less precise than a Qassam rocket but has more explosives. That claim is sourced to an archived news article. but I think it is wrong. For one, Qassam rocket lists its warhead at 1.5-10 Kg, whereas the S-5 is 0.8-1.8Kg, so smaller. For another , the Qassam is unguided and imprecise. I think the claim should be removed even though it  has a source. Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 13:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: S-5 vs. Qassam
Talk:María Lionza

message: Who says "onza" means jaguar? I do not think so. Anagnorisis 03:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just watched a program about Maria Lionza and there was a brief mention of a connection with the Viking Erik the Red. Could someone more knowledgable about the topic add and eliberate within the article more about that connection? Thank you. Viva Wiki!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.147.117 (talk) 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erik the Red? 

message: Today's edition of The New York Times (oct 28) has a good article about the religion and bits about it's history, place in Venezualian society and use of people like Erik the Red. --166.205.6.39 (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good new source: the new York times 

message: Maria Lionza is not worship alone. No mention of Negro Felipe and Indio Guaicaipuro.
They are worship as a trio.
(there are others also .....)
~~Ed~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:C4AB:804B:20D3:AA43 (talk) 09:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned in the article.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not mentioned?
Talk:Herbs (band)

message: hey{{subst:image source|Image:13yearsherbs.jpg)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link in the infobox (http://www.glenmoffatt.com/herbs.htm) is not an official link for the band - it says so itself at http://www.glenmoffatt.com/herbs_site.htm
Should it be removed?
Theotherhades (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove unofficial link?
Talk:List of Dark Angel episodes

message: I will be redirecting the single episodes to this article. WP:EPISODE states that episode articles need real world information (development and reception) backed by second and third party sources. These episodes only provide plot summaries, so they need to go. TTN 00:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Single episode articles

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. -Mask? 02:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use removal
Talk:The Book of Daniel (novel)

message: 1st stub written from memory of the book (which appears to have gone AWOL!), and the cover of the video. Please correct howlers...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Linuxlad (talk • contribs) 22:49, 24 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cannot see how the enclosed removed text can be relevant if the book was written in 1971!
:'(The description of the executions bears a stunning similarity to the description of the actual executions in Louis Nizer's 1973 nonfiction work, Implosion Conspiracy)'.
Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Forward reference

message: Does anybody know what Doctorow means when he writes about Poe being the greatest dissident or the starfish zodiac? --  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.87.139 (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anomalies
Talk:Pioneer species

message: i would just like to note that a pioneer species is not always a plant species.  It can be a species of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, as well.
there is also a serious lack of references especially recent ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.84.89 (talk) 13:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added a merge notice, preferably, each kingdom should get their own subheading as pioneer species.
Obli 14:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: What is another name for pioneer species?<smapussy on dick="autosigned">—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.47.160 (talk • contribs) on 17 April 2006</span></small>
:A ruderal (added to see also) is a plant that lives in highly disturbed habitats. They may also be called early successional species (although that category is a little more inclusive). Richard001 (talk) 08:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  names  

message: Nothing about fauna in the intro. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  fauna 

message: Where do the various cactus species fit in in the sand biome?
Idyllic press (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cacti
Talk:Giuseppe Peano

message: I thought Peano was the inventor of vector spaces. He was the first to axiomatize vector space, after the work of Grassman. Is that wrong ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.212.28.195 (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Peano similarly was a pioneer of axiomatisation of geometry, and beat Hilbert by a decade.  This should be mentioned here. Tkuvho (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peano's axiomatisation of geometry 
Talk:Alexandre Manette

message: The first part of the the "Analysis" section looks as if it was copied from: http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/twocities/themes.html.  Please change this.
128.208.60.88 (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying from Sparknotes: http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/twocities/themes.html
Talk:Peter Llewelyn Davies

message: Birken's book details that Peter destroyed about 2000 letters between Barrie and Michael that had commenced on a daily basis while Michael was unhappy at Eton, and continued until Michael drowned at Oxford. Barrie was posting another letter to Michael when a reporter told him about the drowning.  Peter said something like "It's all just too much" as the reason he destroyed the letters. 
Btw, it is not clear in the article as to what "this terrible masterpiece" is. Myles325a (talk) 07:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified what the "terrible masterpiece" was.  Are you simply suggesting the info about PLD destroying JMB & MLD's correspondence be added to the article, or did you have some point to make about it? -Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter destroyed Michael / Barrie corresondence 

message: I have trouble knowing what his surname is: Llewelyn Davies, or just Davies.  His mother took the married name "Llewelyn Davies", so that was certainly her surname.  Yet, we refer to Peter, her son, as just "Davies", and defaultsort him under just Davies.  Can anyone advise me about this?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 02:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The short answer is: that's how he and his family referred to themselves.  As I understand it, Llewelyn was not legally part of the family name; it was something Peter's ancestors just started using, perhaps to distinguish themselves from some other Davies family, but in everyday conversation, they'd refer to themselves as simply the "Davies family".  Peter (who didn't like the attention the double surname drew) gave his children the single surname Davies. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname
Talk:Sixes (Enneagram of Personality)

message: Er... what's this article all about?? IMHO it could do with an introductory paragraph for the general reader. Ben Finn 23:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's about the Enneagram. I've added a little intro, but since the notice says "not enough context", I'll let it be. --Mathew 16:25, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:3 (company)

message: Uswitch reports that Three's UK customer base now sits at 8.8 million. Can this be added to the United Kingdom section of the article  http://www.uswitch.com/mobiles/news/2012/11/three_adds_1m_customers/  EllieHobbit (talk) 14:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No unless you can find a better source. (WP:RS) --Biker Biker (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the response Uswitch are generally considered as a neutral party within the telecoms industry. Not to worry, how about this reference  http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2225183/three-adds-one-million-customers-in-12-months  EllieHobbit (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That article is based on the company's own data. It would be better to produce subscriber figures from an independent industry source that aren't simply regurgitating press releases. --Biker Biker (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your response. All articles written about companies are invariably based on data which comes from the company itself otherwise how would these outlets know what our figures were? EllieHobbit (talk) 08:48, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Subscribers

message: Please remove Italy in the template. 3 Italy is now Wind Tre  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.90.47.55 (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy 

message: The source for the figure of customers has changed from 130 million to 110 million. 
https://www.ckh.com.hk/en/businesses/telecommunications.php 9000009a (talk) 08:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: —Sirdog (talk) 09:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 March 2022
Talk:Entrainment (physics)

message: Huygens published/presented his scientific works in Latin and French.  I spent some time looking for anything he may have penned in English and have not found a single thing.  Hence, I am quite doubtful that he "coined" any English word.  As of yet, I have also not found any translation of Huygens work where the translator used the word "entrainment."  3piecesuits (talk) 17:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Huygens and "coined"

message: It's not certain that this phenomenon really exists.  See http://www.straightdope.com/columns/021220.html
193.71.196.238 03:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; I'm yanking it. Ojcit 18:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: In any case, there are better, more quantifiable, and less, er, graphic examples. Ojcit 18:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: menstrual synchrony

message: Isn't this process known more commonly as synchronisation or resonance? Subtitling it as physics is very confusing, as entrainment is far more commonly known as a process in fluid dynamics, which is also within physics. Alternatively, could this page be retitled as entrainment_(oscillators) to avoid this confusion?
Entrainment in fluid mechanics is a very commonly known process in which adjacent bodies of fluid exchange fluid into the more turbulent body of fluid. I think having the physics article on entrainment being about Chogg (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: retitle this article