Talk:D-Link

message: I have decided to lock this page after I have discovered that there are much information which seems to be done by vandals. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.207.99.134 (talk • contribs) 17:52, February 25, 2006  (UTC)
: So now we have an article which desperately needs cleaning up/rewriting, has no significant vandalism (at least, not that I could find in the history) and has been locked by someone who can't write grammatically correct sentences or sign their own posts? --Jibjibjib 01:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Phony lock is now removed.  Changed template to cleanup/advertisement.  Article could use a good rewrite.  24.57.203.238 03:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Anon, while I appreciate your attempts to curb vandalism in Wikipedia, there has been no such edits to this article (unless you count the addition of advertising content).  Your efforts here are misguided.  To protect a page, you must be an administrator; only they have the power to lock down an article.  Applying the "semiprotected" template doesn't actually lock anything. — EagleOne\Talk 20:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page is locked

message: :Image:DlinkLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DlinkLogo.gif

message: It sounds like a commercial  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.20.5 (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History section needs some work

message: Would it be wise to note that many drifers are NOT compatible for x64 Vista? This includes the current retail DWA/N-130 Wireless N USB Adapter. It also may be wise to note that the D-Link website May not provide USB 2.0 compatible drivers for your specific piece of hardware. One more thing, XP states that the drivers obtained from the D-Link website AND the CD itself are NOT Digitally Signed, even though screen shots on the website say they are. 66.168.19.135 (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  x64 Windows/Vista 

message: This has recently been removed as it is stale, at three years old. However, I'd like to get more input as the GPL violation case was quite significant in the history of the GPL, I believe. I think this needs some discussion. Verbal chat 14:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Timeserver DDOS and GPL Violations 

message: The article D-Link G604T Network Adaptor has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:There is no verifiability, its all original research and its not a notable product. Find at least one neutral review, or really this article should go.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jez t e C 19:07, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm passing on this note as I'm not exactly a fan of D-Link products, however the note was left for me since I did some very basic stuff on the article in the past. CaribDigita (talk) 19:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[D-Link G604T Network Adaptor]]

message: Hey there,
I was thinking it might be worthwhile mentioning that there have been  number of technical issues with some of the D-link routers (we can cite either Dlink relase notes, or adslgeek.com/dslmodem/d-link and I can find more if we need to)
Do you guys think this would add to the article? I am not fully up to speed on all the Wiki rules?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.170.182 (talk) 11:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-Link router issues? 

message: Can somebody add this to the page?
DLink is the market share leader for WLAN devices in 2010.
http://www.instat.com/press.asp?Sku=IN1004773WL&ID=2815
121.7.171.153 (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market Share 

message: The example pictures of D-Link routers are all quite old. Would be nice to have some newer images, particularly considering the rather radical design shifts seen in the new AC routers (eg. DIR-895L/R and DIR-868L). Besides routers, there are wi-fi cameras (eg. DCS-825L) and other smart home products (DCH-101KT) that may give readers a better idea of the updated product line the company now offers. 122.146.2.131 (talk) 02:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed update of product images 

message: As an employee at D-Link, COI prevents me from updating this article myself. The routers displayed under the "Product Range" section are out of date and do not accurately represent the company's current product range. I propose replacing these pictures with more recent examples of company products and perhaps renaming the section, for example to: "Examples of D-Link Products" in order to better support the existing content of the "Product Range" section.
Router wise, good examples would be the DIR-895L/R and the DIR-868L. Besides routers, there are Wi-Fi cameras (eg. DCS-825L) and other offerings such as DIY Security Kits (DCH-101KT). 
Home3369 (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @Home3369: Hello, and thanks for bringing this to our attention. The first problem is that we can't currently use the images displayed on your website, because your company still holds the copyright. If D-Link would like to release those images under a free license (i.e. give permission to Wikipedia and anyone reading Wikipedia to freely use, reproduce, and modify the images provided they credit D-Link), please follow the instructions at :commons:OTRS for sending an e-mail releasing the photographs. Also, please be aware that Wikipedia has a policy against product directories. We can include a few examples of major products a company sells, but not all of them. Please feel free to ask for additional assistance at the Conflict of interest editing noticeboard or message me at User talk:Altamel. Thanks! Altamel (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Edit for "Examples of D-Link Routers" in"Product Range" section. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on D-Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141007073104/http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html to http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120318175314/http://www.jbb.de/fileadmin/download/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf to http://www.jbb.de/fileadmin/download/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Currently this article (D-Link) contains a sentence that saysIn 2021, D-Link announced to become the agent for the international information security brand, Cyberbit in Taiwan, and launched the new EAGLE PRO AI series transforming home Wi-Fi experiences.but the hyperlink pointing to Cyberbit does not do what was ["probably"] intended. 
For some more details, please see 
::Talk:Cyberbit#Use of the term "Cyberbit" to mean something else. 
Thanks for listening! Mike Schwartz (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlink pointing to [[Cyberbit]] redirects to an article about a '''font'''