lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Taca de Portugal

message: *I took away this text from the match 2004-2005: 
: SL Benfica team left the pitch at the 75th minute, when the result was 0-12 (this is a lie, whatever the year you are talking about). The ()-tekst is added by another wikipedian. If it's vandalism, to be deleted. If the dispute has an outcome, then that should be in the table. -DePiep 10:48, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's clearly vandalism. It never happened. No team ever scored 12 goals in the final. --Jcmo 18:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text from match 

message: I think this article is confusing the "knock-out" type of competition with the competitions itself. The cup of Portugal was not founded in 1921 ! it´s completely illogical. The National Championship in the beginning was only open for the regional champions.  The perfomance by club should separate all the competitions, because the Cup of Portugal only began officially in 1939. 
Every specialized Portuguese sports' book or newspaper always split the National Championship winners from the Cup winners. Different competitions, with different winners. For instance, Benfica didn´t won 27 Portuguese Cups, but 24 Portuguese Cups and 3 National Champioships. This is much more accurate. 
Also, another mistake: Competition not held due to the Latin Cup being held in the Estádio Nacional in 1949\50: that is not true, and it´s illogical again, because the Latin Cup was played in the end of the season. I´m pretty sure that the portuguese cup was not held in this season because of the world cup qualifiers; FPF wanted to prepare the games with a long-term project. Obvious failed. --Eagle Fly Free SLB 14:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange article

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Strongly oppose Limiting the search results to English hits for Taca de Portugal reduces the hits to 17,800. The idiomatic English Portugal Cup in far more popular than either. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aervanath (talk) 07:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Waves in plasmas

message: We need a discussion of cut-off, resonance, and evanescence. And we need a discussion of waves at oblique incidence, including the Clemmow-Mullaly-Allis (CMA) diagram. Finally, check there are no terms unexplained or quantities undefined. Art Carlson 11:32, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
Isn't the "pipe trick" ((Category:Waves in plasmas|*)) supposed to put this article at the head of the line in the list of articles in the category? Art Carlson 19:57, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
The equation \omega^2 = \omega_i^2 = \Omega_c\omega_c for the lower-hybrid frequency does not make any sense at all: \omega_i depends on the ion density but not the magnetic field, whereas \Omega_c\omega_c depends on the magnetic field but not the ion density! A little digging into some text books says that it should be \frac{1}{\omega^2} = \frac{1}{\omega_i^2} + \frac{1}{\Omega_c\omega_c}. Usually one is very much smaller than the other and is ignored, but I feel that the general equation should be put here (and on the lower-hybrid page).  I will edit shortly unless someone objects.129.78.64.103 (talk) 05:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Who's Your Daddy? (2005 TV series)

message: ---------
*You haven't been watching much lately have you? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

message: The article mentions there was "strong" controversy surrounding this show. But then it doesn't elaborate much. Could someone please add this? 172.58.139.212 (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy?
Talk:Calumon

message: I dont know why its there ubt calumon is not untraining hes a rookie level digimon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.45.147 (talk) 03:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he is In-Training. The game that called him a rookie was a typo, which happens all the time. Check the card's, or an official fan-site for more info.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 15:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: level

message: I really had to re-do this page, it didn't do Calumon justice :P - Aluren
:Well, you did forget a few things, such as not putting this as a personal article.  I have removed two of the links because they are for Digimon in general, and not for this one.  -x42bn6 Talk 07:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: re-do

message: Is this even a word? The only place I could find it on the Internet was as a profile name for a forum member. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.211.181.49 (talk • contribs) .
:It's a real greek which means the the realization of potential. It refers to the state when a potential 'something' actually becomes the 'something'. No idea who or where the term "Digi Entelekheia" actually comes from, or even if it's canon. --Yaksha 06:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The term is "Digi-Entelechies". It's used in the original Japanese version, and referenced here on Chiaki J. Konaka's Digimon Tamers website. http://www.konaka.com/alice6/tamers/characters/calumon-e.html and http://www.konaka.com/alice6/tamers/cjk/DigitalWold_e.jpg (near the bottom) -Tacubus (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entelekheia 

message: This seems like it might benefit from being trimmed and merged to the List_of_characters_in_Digimon_Tamers#Calumon article. Thoughts?KrytenKoro 04:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is information, but not really a lot. I'd be fine with a merge, but whatever. -- Ned Scott 06:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and Trim 

message: I know alot of people think of the symbol on calumon's head as an upside down digi hazzard symbol but to me it looks nothing like it. To me it looks like a spaced out black triforce.
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/zelda/images/thumb/2/2a/Black_Triforce.svg/120px-Black_Triforce.svg.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Culumon.jpg
Pyrolord777 (talk) 03:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The triforce has no middle triangle. Guilmon, however, has virtually the same symbol all over him.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 03:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triforce
Talk:Polyamide

message: I guess this could be merged with Nylon - or Information from there moved here. --BjKa 13:16, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Nylon isn't a single polymer either, and Nylon and Polyamide should both be included in one article, entitled Polyamide.  In this article there should be information on all of the various Nylon (aka Polyamide) resins (ie Nylon 6, Nylon 6,6, Nylon 6,8, Nylon 6,12, ect) and information on various biological and other Polyamides.  The fact of the matter is that in the worlds of science, technology, industry, chemistry, and engineering the names Nylon and Polyamide is used interchangably.  This is going to take a lot of work, but I plan on finding a happy merger for these articles in the near future.  I will first post some information for yall on the topic, and why they should be the same article.  CoolMike 01:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the reference to ammonia as a product of elimination. --Kupirijo (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammonia as product of ellimination 

message: Merge with Nylon
Same answer as you got at Talk:Nylon#Merge_with_Polyamide, before you moved the discussion here. No.  There are plenty of polyamides – only a subset are Nylon.  There are plenty of others, just as significant, that aren't Nylon. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Andy, nylons are a subset, this article should be about polyamides in general. V8rik (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Honorifics in Judaism

message: Is there an article about Honorifics in Judaism, not concerning dead people?
Like "Shlit'a" (She-ichye le-yamim tovim arukim) and "Admo'r" (Adonenu Morenu ve-Rabenu) for a very important rabbi, or "Sh'y" (she-ichye) for everyone.
I would expand this article, if I just knew how...
Thanks!
200.214.44.133 18:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: not concerning dead people

message: I'm looking for a def, and notice that I have to go to two different sections, and even that collection does not seem right. Perhaps have an example in literature, one in print, and one in a video posted ("Reb Shlomo") MichelleInSanMarcos (talk) 12:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  need section for Reb 

message: Gaon is used for 'genius' in modern Hebrew but the original meaning and the more accurate one in this context is 'Pride of'.
Alan3278 (talk) 14:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Gaon 
Talk:Wildfire (disambiguation)

message: While a Bushfire is technically classed as a Wildfire, the song "Bushfire" doesn't really count. I'm removing it. 
:Agree. I moved the info to Bushfire. Rl 15:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Corrected the redirection to the correct article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.53.23.66 (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jagged Alliance:Wildfire
Talk:Foster care

message: — Assignment last updated by Isabellalunads (talk) 23:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice

message: I would like to add a paragraph to the lead section of this article discussing the global phenomenon of poor retention rates of social workers. 
I also would like to propose transferring the subsection of "U.S. Academic Opposition to Foster Care" to the "Foster care in the United States" page. 
Additionally, I will be contributing to the "Therapeutic intervention" subsection by adding information on Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care. 
I will also add all my supporting references.  
I have concerns about the current final paragraph in the lead section that discusses negative outcomes of foster care. It is lacking a neural voice and citations. 
I have concerns about the "Poverty and homelessness" section as the supporting sources are not that reputable and it is not written in a neutral tone.  
Astebbins (talk) 19:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Edits 

message: I still don't get get what foster care means 47.150.204.170 (talk) 02:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foster care
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-05-16/In the news

message: "without a penny being paid for its contributions or an ounce of kudos lent to its contributors". Many would dispute the second part of that statement, with considerable kudos given to the project by its many supporters around the world. I think the responce misses the point of the assertion which is that none of the individual authors get any personal kudos.--JK the unwise 14:21, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think the huge amount of general kudos the project generates does equate to a little bit of personal kudos for all its editors, even if they aren't named individually (and sometimes they are - Wired featured profiles of several major editors earlier this year).  And within the project, there's kudos aplenty, I often thank people for their work and congratulate them on good work, as do many others.  So, although I do take your point, I think the journalist who wrote the article was wrong to imply that kudos to the project does not mean kudos for individual authors, so I'd stand by what I wrote originally.  Worldtraveller 15:47, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Wet electrons

message: This article fails to explain what a "wet electron" is.
It also fails to explain that the term "wet electron" is not a universal term, but referred to in a small number of papers referring to certain electron molecule interactions. 
Some evidence is required before the wet electron = saddle point argument can be made.
The link to this article from Saddle point should probably be removed until this article is clarified. --pflodo 14:29, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
:Just confirming it isn't actually a hoax: . Pretty obscure though. Rd232 22:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the actual reference the webpage above refers to: Science, 308, 1154 (2005). I haven't read it but I will try. Jas131 11:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Alagar Kovil

message: Someone with more knowledge of the topic needs to clarify this stub.  It is not at all clear what Alagar Koyil is, and no context is given for the information about Alagar and Meenakshi to show how it relates to this presumably geographic entity.  
The most unclear phrase is "The Kall-Alagar (Stone Alagar) procession takes place during that season . . .." The stub never says or even hints at what season "that season" is. --Logician 14:32, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone please add more information about the Teppakulam in Alagar kovil.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashobiz (talk • contribs) 08:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teppakulam 

message: In one page of this articles - Kalazhar temple, it is mentioned that the Religion & Festivals is Tenkalai and in another page it's as Vadakalai. It's to be verified from the temple authority and rectified in the article.  Kandasamy Natarajan (talk) 14:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenkalai (தென்கலை) / Vadakalai (வடகலை)
Talk:Quiet Life

message: It reminds me of them, I wonder if anyone else thinks so? Edit, I should say some elements of the Steely Dan song, Do It Again, I don't know Steely Dan's music enough to comment on their other music. Middle More Rider (talk) 00:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alien, influenced by Steely Dan? 

message: Any references about the album originally going to be called European Son, as mentioned in the article?
I have seen a Rob Dean interview where he says the album title was originally going to be Alien, but as the cinema release of the Sigourney Weaver film happened they decided not to.
Middle More Rider (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original intended title?
Talk:Gentlemen Take Polaroids

message: The article states that Gentlemen Take Polaroids was a concept album built around the idea of "a man driving along a road at night". I have never heard of this claim before, and if this is true it certainly doesn't come across in enough of the songs on the album to make it a concept album. I've flagged the statement up for verification rather than just deleting it, but does anybody know for sure? MassassiUK 23.14, 29 June 2007
:If not the album, the cover art is definitely high concept of some kind. Kabuki or what... the makeup seems an odd choice for Japan. Maybe the Life on Mars vid popularize the look. I'm too young to know about that --72.173.160.58 (talk) 23:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Concept?

message: Who is the vocalist Cyo? Middle More Rider (talk) 23:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyo
Talk:Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi

message: Could you add "nationality" in the infobox?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 08:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Did not manage, neither with citzenship, nationality and ethnicity parameters...he may be Austrian (-1920), Czechoslovak (1920-1939) and French (1939-)...(KIENGIR (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No nationality 

message: "According to his autobiography, at the beginning of 1924 his friend Baron Louis de Rothschild introduced him to Max Warburg who offered to finance his movement for the next three years by giving him 60,000 gold marks. Warburg remained sincerely interested in the movement for the remainder of his life and served as an intermediate for Coudenhove-Kalergi with influential Americans such as banker Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch."
 Kalergi's autobiography, Crusade for Pan-Europa (available on Internet Archive) doesn't mention any Rothschild or payment of 60,000 marks. It vaguely mentions at one point the "good offices" of Mr. Warburg, along with a litany of other (non-Jewish) financiers. This remark was added on May 26, 2014, and apparently hasn't been removed since, but it's an apparent (likely antisemitic) fabrication. Xorometros (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted that text, which was introduced by an IP here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 03:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated claims about Jewish financiers
Talk:Star sapphire

message: Going to finish this article soon.
--Meawoppl 00:27, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved these comments from the main article. --OpenToppedBus 14:50, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks I am still rather new to this whole wikipedia thing --Meawoppl 17:31, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sandomierz

message: Either add Lithuanian name here, or remove Polish names from such articles as Siauliai and Panevežys: these cities never belonged to the Crown during Republic of Both Nations, nor they were part of Vilnius region during interwar, nor they has nor ever had any significant Polish minority. Someone tried to remove these names, and the arguement for not removal was because Lithuania and Poland had common history. So, there has to be a common standard then. Either we add names to all cities were they are different in Lithuanian and Polish, or we only add both language names to cities of Vilnius region and Suvalkai region, and elsewhere keep only the local name DeirYassin 15:16, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: there is neither justification, nor need for using only one language; Republic of Both Nations was bilingual and tolerant; I think that should it survive, there would still be bilingual names; besides, there are Polish and Kashubian names in the Kashubian towns and villages (though Kashubians were never a separate nation; they are only an ethnic group with their own independent Slavic language) Critto
Well, if you don't like Polish names for Siauliai and Panevežys, and think you have a valid reason for removing them, then just do what you think appropriate on those article pages.  Why are you dragging Sandomierz into this? Balcer 15:36, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic names in other languages
Talk:Andrew Wiles

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :এণ্ড্ৰিউ ৱাইলছ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 16#এণ্ড্ৰিউ ৱাইলছ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Largoplazo (talk) 11:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "এণ্ড্ৰিউ ৱাইলছ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: How old is he? 75.111.6.243 (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see it in the article. :) --D.M. from Ukraine (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew wiles 

message: Are there no better photos available? Poor guy literally looks like a stage villain. Hjnt (talk) 23:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a better one here (from 2016 I believe) but I can't upload it because I'm not confirmed yet. Chillenb (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll upload it when I reach 10 edits. Apparently replying on talk pages counts as editing :) Chillenb (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the picture is copyright protected. So not the best plan. The Banner talk 22:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo change
Talk:1994 United States House of Representatives elections

message: Is it just me, or does the table under "voting members" about Wisconsin results not really make sense? The "status" column seems superfluous, and I'm not sure that we should have Wisconsin results in there if we don't have the results for the other 420+ members of the house. I'm going to remove it for now. Cbsteven 17:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wisonsin results table 

message: The section headed "Overall Results" contained arithmetic errors.  I corrected the arithmetic errors in the "number of seats" percentages (which came from truncating decimals instead of rounding).  However, in the popular vote column, 44.0%+0.9%+49.9% does not equal 100% no matter how times I check it.  I deleted the "total 100%" from the column, but the figures should be corrected.
Geoffrey.landis 19:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arithmetic error in Overall Results
Talk:Blattellidae

message: Should this page be moved to a page called Blattellinae? http://blattodea.speciesfile.org/Common/basic/Taxa.aspx?TaxonNameID=1174511  Happy1892 (talk) 02:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an amateur, so take this for what it's worth, but the page you linked doesn't say that Blattellidae is a subfamily of Ectobiidae; the only appearance of the term is in the sentence "Type genus:  Blattella Caudell, 1903; priority for family-group names based on Blattella dates from Blattellidae Karny, 1908". If you look at the page on "family Ectobiidae Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1865" from the same site, it lists "Blattellidae Karny, 1908" as a synonym. ITIS lists Blattellidae as a family but does not list Ectobiidae. EOL lists Ectobiidae as the "German Cockroach" family and Blattellidae as the "Wood Cockroach" family. Like many areas of taxonomy, there are competing views; I tend to leave questions like this to people with better knowledge of entomological taxonomy issues. (Which sounds like you're doing too, by asking rather than changing). There are definitely areas within Wikipedia's entomology articles that can benefit from a careful amateur researcher's help, but choosing between different classifications seems particularly complicated. Agyle (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Blattellidae now subfamily of Ectobiidae: Blattellinae?
Talk:Funimation

message: I have made a split request to split Funimation into Crunchyroll, LLC and Funimation (Service). Kevin Talk 02:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have pitched my support for this many times in the past. If no one opposes, I see no reason why Draft:Crunchyroll, LLC shouldn't be moved into the mainspace (pending updates and expansion as needed). Draft:Funimation can also be used as a model for this article (which will be about the service pending the split). Link20XX (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep 100% this. Kevin Talk 05:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I support but I don't agree with the (Service) sub divider. Why can't it just be Funimation if it won't be in use?--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s fine too I went with that because the previous proposed splits did so . Kevin Talk 02:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed  Split  

message: It seems to be that it talks about a different streaming service it talks about  Crunchyroll a competitor and not the same company 71.169.160.200 (talk) 10:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the sections above. We are in an active discussion at the moment about dividing pages.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong article