lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flue-gas emissions from fossil-fuel combustion

message: Good day, the meaning of the first sentence is not clear to me. It seems like it was poorly edited. It currently reads: "Flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion refers to the combustion product gas resulting from the much as 10 to 25 volume percent or more of the flue gas." Can someone edit? I do not know the subject well enough to do so. Thanks, Hu Gadarn (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence needs work 

message: In response to Hu Gadarn just above, the reason that the introduction made no sense to you is that User:24.154.119.71 committed vandalism by removing almost all of the lead-in paragraphs and their references on November 7, 2010. 
I created this article years ago and have since left Wikipedia ... and no one seems to have corrected that vandalism which was done over a year ago. It was purely by happenstance that I saw the above remark by Hu Gadarn and have now corrected the vandalism. mbeychok (talk) 22:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost complete vandalism by [[User:24.154.119.71]] on 15:22 of Nov.7, 2010.

message: 'Flue-gas emissions from fossil-fuel combustion' is a verbose title.   I can't see that any confusion would be caused be simply shortening it to to 'Flue-gas emissions'.   I will propose that formally shortly if there is no further comment. - Crosbie 05:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbose title 

message: "Carbon dioxide (CO2), the next largest part of flue gas, can be as much as 10−25 volume percent or more of the flue gas. This is closely followed in volume by water vapor (H2O) created by the combustion of the hydrogen in the fuel with atmospheric oxygen." is there a source for this information? Skyeyu (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing source?
Talk:Concept and object

message: I was wondering about the addition of context, the phil. of language, to this article.  I wanted to post something here instead of just change it.  I'm not sure why either the distinction itself or the difficulties Frege faced with the distinction should be situated in philosophy of language.  The distinction itself was, arguably, part of Frege's metaphysics (although it is true that those that have Wittgensteinian readings of Frege might disagree).  The difficulty or awkwardness he faced as a result of trying to articulate this distinction in natural language ( the "concept horse" problem) is a problem that is best situated in philosophical logic.   Cvalenzu 22:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ?
Talk:Ruth Berkeley White

message: White discusses these on less than two pages  &  of a twenty-two page pamphlet, and then never again in her works. Doesn't seem to get over the WP:NN bar. MARussellPESE 18:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: World Unity Conferences

message: W.M. Miller's book is not an appropriate source. WP:V requires reliable sources from reliable publishers. Inclusion fails both criteria:
#William McElwee Miller is an evangelical Christian apologist rendering him an unreliable source.
#The book is published by the William Carey Library effectively making it self-published.
The only wiggle room for self-published authors is in ¶2 of WP:SELFPUB which allows for inclusion if their "work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications". No other third-party uses him or his book as a reference. MARussellPESE (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miller as a Source 

message: Glaysher's site is classic failure of WP:V
*Unreliable source
*Self-published blog MARussellPESE (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Glaysher as a Source

message: I highly doubt this person is still living. Her full name appears to be Ruth Berkeley White (according to the Library of Congress), and she was publishing in the 1920s. This unreliable but well-researched article suggests White was born in the 1880s, and was a stage actress in the early 1900s before marrying George Rowell and later Herbert Lawrence White (1869-1953). More conclusive research is needed, but from the date of publications alone it seems safe to conclude White is probably no longer living. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  living person?
Talk:Govind Ballabh Pant

message: Pant is a Nepali caste. How come GB Pant has Indian roots? Pant/Panta is classified in Khas Bahun (Nepali Brahmin) family.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.247.150 (talk) 09:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:NOTFORUM. Indian and Nepali cultures share a lot of features. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caste? 

message: @Adamstraw99 Thank you for your comments on 1/4/2016.
We wish to reiterate that we have received innumerable appreciative comments from readers on our recent updated version of the 125 years cumulative 3 Wikipedia pages , and therefore hope for your understanding instead. 
@ Suresh / Akash / Neeraj / Govinda / Gaurika.Sureshpandey (talk), I have embbed my responses below --Adamstraw99 (talk) 08:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: --Indeed this will be created as a subsection, all of the activities are documented , widely circulated and registered in the Registrar of Societies, should any need third party confirmation they are in the public domain.Sureshpandey (talk) 09:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply

message: Hello @Adamstraw99, the contributors to this page and for K. C. Pant's page have declared their COI. Please review. When you finish reviewing, you may please remove the maintenance tag for COI in both pages. Thank you. Shadowfinder (talk) 10:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: These things happen organically. There is no need to request the removal of the tag (and an editor with a COI should not make such a request) - once an uninvolved editor has reviewed the article and revised/rewritten it as necessary, the tag will be removed. That might take some time, because there has been so much COI editing to these articles over a long period of time, but there is no deadline. --bonadea contributions talk 12:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:University of Michigan College of Engineering

message: University of Michigan is not represented with a project at :Category:WikiProject Universities. Please comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  02:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Michigan Project
Talk:University of Michigan College of Engineering/to do

message: *Add a History section
*Expand
**Academics
**Facilities
*Note notable labs and research groups
*I would like to suggest a link to the Michigan Engineering Interpro site, http://interpro.engin.umich.edu, which is where info on the UM Financial Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering among several other degrees can be found.  Thanks, (Jessicahullman 18:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sarno

message: "Salerno" in the first sentence links to Salerno the town, it should link to Salerno the province.  I'll fix that now.  - 24.129.125.161 23:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: There have been 2 world wars and a great depression since the 1911 encyclopedia. Does the town still have the same industries? Could someone please provide an up to date source and update the info? Thanks. Edison 20:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stale ref
Talk:Mount Pleasant Winery

message: Currently, both Mount Pleasant's and Les Bourgeois' Wiki pages say that they are the third largest wineries in Missouri. Obviously, both can't be true.Trinite (talk) 15:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Largest in Missouri

message: Hi all,
I am associated with Mount Pleasant and we cannot find any evidence that Friedrich Munch founded the winery.  Does anyone have any source documentation on it?  Otherwise, we'd like to strike his name from the list of founders.  Our belief is that George Munch founded and operated the winery due to documents that we have.  This doesn't mean that he was the only one, we just do not have any documents to show that Friedrich founded the winery.
We'd also like to add to the varietal listings Vidal Blanc, Chambourcin and St. Vincent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mowineguy (talk • contribs) 22:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friedrich Munch
Talk:TJX Companies

message: The article lists TJX as owning BJ's, but BJ's article says TJX spun them off several years ago. Mbisanz 00:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: also, txj article at beginning mentions opening bj's in 1984; it's listed under "former chains"; but then history is silent (on both opening and divestment).   can someone please loop the loop?--98.116.115.220 (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   BJ's 

message: the infobox says its $690bn................................surely this is a mistake :P  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.200.180 (talk) 12:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  net income 

message: Someone wanna add StyleSense to the list of Canadian stores? I can't since I for WMI -.- 
http://www.stylesense.ca/en/home.asp
--FusionOpz (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylesense
Talk:Adelaide del Vasto

message: ... When he married her. I think that may be out be 11 years. --105.4.3.146 (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of Roger 

message: — Assignment last updated by Badrat1 (talk) 16:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages
Talk:Marshalls

message: greendale mall rocks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.229.67 (talk) 18:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have discussed the relevant edits on the editor's talk page rather than here, as stated in my edit summary. I42 (talk) 16:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NPOV]] - see talk page. 

message: There was a press release recently for Marshalls coming to Canada in 2011, would this make for an appropriate edit?
http://www.financialpost.com/open+Marshalls+Canada/3300522/story.html
--FusionOpz (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marshalls in Canada 

message: 4m.islands!81.11.219.129 (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If I understand what this is supposed to say, you are right, it should have the disambig notification at the top, which I have added. - GalatzTalk 14:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  nedsDISAMB 
Category talk:Pulitzer Prize-winning newspapers

message: When has AM New York won a Pulitzer? Metstotop333 02:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AM New York?

message: : See also section 1
There are now 88 pages in the category.
Relying generally on our list Pulitzer Prize for Public Service#Winners, investigating only some of its bluelinks, I count 68-69 nominally distinct newspapers that have won the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 97 years 1917–2013. Three are redlinks in our list; two or three are covered by one newspaper article (Ledger-Enquirer); twelve are bluelinks missing from the category. Thus 52 pages in the category are newspaper articles about Public Service Pulitzer winners. 36 are not. 
If we define newspapers now covered by one article as one gold-medalist newspaper (gmnp): 67 gmnp − 3 redlink gmnp − 12 bluelink gmnp missing from the category = 52 gmnp in the category.
--P64 (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Coverage
Talk:List of Ultimate Spider-Man story arcs

message: This comic should be included in the list: Ultimate Spider-Man (2000) #0.5 https://www.marvel.com/comics/issue/4373/ultimate_spider-man_2000_0.5  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.177.148.182 (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Steel Jeeg

message: What is your reason for classifying Jeeg as being a "fantasy anime"? Kouban 23:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To Miss Ethereal

message: There is a new, 2007 Kotetsu Jeeg series that continues the storyline of the 1970s version.  Sorry, I don't really know a lot about it. Luis Dantas (talk) 00:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 sequel
Talk:Agostino Tassi

message: A disaster. I don't know who wrote this article, but he or she hasn't done serious research.
I wrote much of this article.  The sources I utilized are included on this page.  None of this material is made up, but has been culled from available resources.  Could you please be more specific about what requires improvement/modification?  I'd be happy to make any necessary changes.  --Polylerus 00:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources must have been subsequently removed. There is currently only a link to a list of Tassi's works. I've added an 'unreferenced' clean-up template. Sionk (talk) 00:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article makes the statement that Agostino Tassi's conviction for rape was annulled. If that were the case, then wouldn't his conviction have never legally existed? In other words, any part of the article that states he was a convicted rapist is false. 47.217.107.180 (talk) 04:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annulled verdict? 

message: > Tassi [. . .] had committed incest with his sister-in-law
Not to defend this guy, who is, objectively, a piece of shit, but the sibling-in-law relationship is nearly always between people who are not blood relatives, and therefore sex between them would not constitute incest. Was Tassi's siter-in-law also his sister? (Then why not say so?) Also, there's no citation for this statement. TypoBoy (talk) 15:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been more than a month, and nobody has supported the incest charge. I removed it from the article TypoBoy (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incest
Talk:Neo Ranga

message: Neo Ranga was one of the first animes I ever viewed, sometime after I cut my teeth on Neon Genesis Evangelion. I found Neo Ranga to be a fantasy of peculiar force, so much so that I'm surprised it doesn't have a fuller treatment here.  Hence my nomination -it certainly deserves more than a stub! -- preceding unsigned comment by Kencf
:Sadly, I've only seen approximately half the series, but I really had a good time with it.  It's been a while though (at least a couple years).  I've added character descriptions, incorporating more information not available on ADV Films' bios (not to mention trying to avoid copyvio as that's a serious no-no).  It could be argued that ADV Films' bios represent information equivalent to a media kit, but even in that case, they still needed a rewrite and expansion. 
:A nice change from my usual taxonomic articles and lists, anyway.  Thanks for opening this up! -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 05:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AMCotW nomination

message: Mania.com complete collection --KrebMarkt (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Bde Maka Ska

message: Saying that Bde Maka Ska is "previously known as Lake Calhoun" is untrue. It continues to be known by that name. You could say it is "previously officially named" but some of you are woking too hard that you'll write something flatly untrue in the lede sentence of what is meant to be a repisitory of knowledge. Kislorod23 (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Reliable sources such as the media, newspapers, Google maps, the government etc refer to it now as Bde Maka Ska. Using reliable sources is the one of the foundations of Wikipedia. Your opinion or what your friends call the lake is not a reliable source that is used on Wikipedia. The former name is presented as it should be, a previous name.  oncamera  (talk page) 04:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's amazing you pretend not to understand what the word "known" means. The government refers to it as Bde Maka Ska? Yes, that would be an official name, not "known" which has a much broader meaning. Do people continue to say Lake Calhoun? Yes. If someone said "Lake Calhoun" to you, would you have to search your brain for what landmark that is? No. It is demonstrably still known as Lake Calhoun. Kislorod23 (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, your comment is referring to non-reliable sources. The former name has been replaced by the new name throughout the surrounding neighborhoods. There's now the Bde Maka Ska parkway, the neighborhoods East Bde Maka Ska and West Maka Ska have also been officially renamed. Eventually, the next generations will only know Bde Maka Ska and won't know what you're talking about when you use the former name. It's like telling kids today about the former Camp Snoopy at the Mall of America; they'll have no idea what that means since they've only seen Nickelodeon Universe.  oncamera  (talk page) 04:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Eventually? What a defense. Anyhow, you better run off and fix Denali as they appear to be using non-reliable sources! Kislorod23 (talk) 04:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll stay on topic here, thanks. Please present reliable sources that show the media, newspapers etc use the former name of Lake Calhoun instead of Bde Maka Ska since the name change. It's being replaced throughout Minneapolis if not yet completely removed thus no need to give it equal weight just because it's how you refer to it.  oncamera  (talk page) 04:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You argued "also known as" is against the standards of Wikipedia, and yet exactly that phrase is used in an analogous article. It's funny you call yourself a expert in philosophy and talk complete nonsense. Have fun reigning over this article. Kislorod23 (talk) 04:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not involved with the Denali article. Remain civil and avoid personal attacks if you want to remain an editor on Wikipedia. Otherwise, you'll eventually be blocked from editing for this kind of disruptive behavior towards other editors you disagree with. Thanks,  oncamera  (talk page) 04:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previously known as
Talk:Lake Harriet (Minnesota)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 13#Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Leschnei (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:So Lo Pun

message: On Romanisation'
As far as I know, So Lo Pun is, like most of Shataukok, a Hakka speaking area. It would make sense therefore to pronunce 'forefather' as gung rather that "gong". Besides that, the names given seem to be Cantonese renderings. Perhaps a Hakka rendering is closer to the names the local inhabitants know their ancestors as.  Dylanwhs 23:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iris (Mega Man)

message: I'm shocked noone at Capcom thought this up. Iris is a robot so she could be rebuilt just like Zero was. No need for a sad ending to her, Zero could just put the parts back together. It's so simple yet they never did it. Wonder why.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.57.184 (talk) 22:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rebuild? 

message: Is the first appearance her first chronological appearance, or her first appearance in terms of release date? I thought it was the latter and changed it to X4 instead of Xtreme 2. Sorry if I flubbed, it didn't really say what it was. --Ragey 15:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance
Talk:Curtsy

message: Could someone please provide instructions how to do this?  Perhaps with a diagram of some sort?
I'm no expert, but over the years I have read references to several ways to do it.  The only one that comes to mind is the difference between the french style and the italian style.  But I'll bet there were more.24.10.102.46 20:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How to do this?

message: A series of pictures explains more than several dozen words. CapnZapp (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I cannot beleive this happens - as described it must be anatomically impossible, and even if they can acheive to dip in such a way - to whom are they curtsying  - and why? Giano (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure the existing section is warranted. I've never heard of it, and if it's just something women do at an obscure American social event it isn't really relevant to the broader article. Maybe an American editor could comment. --Ef80 (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  texan dip illustrations? 

message: The article doesn't even attempt to answer why females curtsey (or why men bow). Is it somehow related to decency? CapnZapp (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A traditional curtsey looks very graceful and appealing when the woman is wearing a floor length skirt, and allows the woman to maintain eye contact with the person being curtsied to. The whole thing can be quite sexually charged. The male bow is just about formal deference. A curtsey just looks silly if the woman is wearing a short skirt, and a bow is more appropriate then. --Ef80 (talk) 18:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  reason for curtsey/bow split? 

message: Please don't add the Trump "curtsy".  Given the level of vitriol that's aimed at him by the media, he could have punched the King in the face and someone would have accused him of genuflecting.  In the absence of something really solid, which would not be the brief speculation on CNN etc, he was bending to allow an old fella to more easily put the chain over his head.  Bromley86 (talk) 07:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump 

message: This article was originally written in UK spelling (curtsey) but was changed to US spelling (curtsy) as a minor edit with no substantial explanation. The Wikipedia guide stipulates one should not be changed out for the other arbitrarily. I propose to return it to its original UK spelling and seek feedback for an argument as to why it should be allowed to remain changed in contravention of Wikipedia's rules.
Jules Lolonois (talk) 11:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to original spelling convention
Talk:Unitarity

message: IMO, this article should NOT be merged with Unitary Operator.  Unitary operator is an operator.  Unitarity is a property that can apply to things other than operators. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.38.253.9 (talk • contribs) .
:Like what? —Keenan Pepper 05:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. linas 17:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge. There is nothing in this article that is not already in unitary operator or can't be trivially added. Muzzle 12:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merge proposal
Talk:Believe

message: This is my suggestion. --ElectricEye (talk) 07:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no article for believe, so what's there to merge in? Wouldn't that be a move? I oppose a move. Either put a disambiguation line on belief or change believer to be a disambiguation page and allow users to decide on the belief article or the band. --Walter Görlitz 19:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It take it back. There is an article for believe, but this doesn't belong there. --Walter Görlitz 19:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge