lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Florence Lawrence

message: Born 1886 as per this biodata. Find-a-Grave is far from reliable, especially since, as in this case, her gravestone was erected many decades after her death by actor Roddy McDowall (see article text), as she had no family and had been buried without a gravestone. Quis separabit? 22:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: Essanay reported the offer to Biograph's head office, and they were promptly fired. But then: Needing a star, [Laemmle] lured Lawrence away from Biograph by promising to give her a marquee.
Blaming Solter for making her do the stunt in which she was injured, the two divorced. But then: Her first marriage was to... Harry Solter in 1908. They remained married until Solter's death in 1920.
 Valetude (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies
Talk:Jacqueline Robinson

message: Jacqueline Robinson was born in London in 1922, she died in Paris in 2000. She is considered as a main figure of modern dance in France. 
Danseuse, chorégraphe et pédagogue, Jacqueline Robinson fonda en 1955 à Paris l’une des premières écoles de danse contemporaine à dispenser une formation professionnelle, L’Atelier de la Danse, qui devint rapidement un haut lieu de rencontres artistiques favorisant le développement d’une modernité chorégraphique encore peu reconnue. De nombreux professeurs de renommée internationale tels que Jérôme Andrews, Bella Reine, Delphine Rybinski et Susan Buirge se succédèrent à ses côtés, formant ou accompagnant plusieurs générations d’artistes. Dans le souci exigeant de transmission qui l’anima sa vie durant, Jacqueline Robinson écrivit également d’importants ouvrages témoignant de sa riche expérience où création et enseignement artistiques furent étroitement liés : L’Enfant et la danse (Éditions Universitaires, 1975), Éléments du langage chorégraphique (Vigot, 1981), L’Aventure de la danse moderne en France 1920-1970 (Bougé, 1990) ou encore Introduction au langage musical (Chiron, 1991). 
http://www.ogelinier-jrobinson.fr/JRbio.htm 
http://www.imec-archives.com/fonds/fiche.php?ind=JRB
Joachim gélinier (talk) 23:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  jacqueline robinson (1922-2000)
Talk:Jacques Levy

message: This article is very similar in wording to the Guardian obituary it references. Does this amount to copyright infringement? David Peacham 09:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably.  I've done a very quick semi-rewriting and hopefully got the worst of it (I only barely skimmed the obit.), but it could probably use more... and more information, too.  Unfortunately, there are only so many ways to (concisely) phrase minimal information. -Bbik 06:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle

message: Wasn´t the slogan : Heim ins Reich 
87.78.255.9 13:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heimat ins Reich ? 

message: A VoMi unit, Sonderkommando R(ussland), institutional successor to Einsatzgruppe D in the Transnistria area, carried out numerous massacres of Jews during the first half of 1942. The victims were deportees from Rumanian-controlled territory, it being Marshal Ion Antonescu's policy to racially "cleanse" the Rumanian nation. His preferred technique was to expell them to German-controlled territory and have the responsible SS/Police units exterminate them. Many of these Jews were passed back and forth for weeks before a mix of Sk-R units and ethnic German Selbstschutz militia killed them.
Most of these murders occurred in the County (Judetul) of Berezovca, where ethnic Germans, distributed among 40 or so villages, made up 40% of the population. Sk-R was commanded by SS-Standartenfuher Horst Hoffmeyer, a senior VoMi officer. His HQ was in  Landau, located west of the River Bug. Apparently, the unit was divided into seven local offices, three of which were:
* Worms - commanded by SS-Obersturmfuhrer Streit
* Lichtenfeld - SS-Obersturmfuhrer Franz Liebl
* Rastatt - SS-Hauptsturmfuhrer Rudolf Hartung
Liebl's unit, for example, was responsible for the massacre of 1,200 Jews at Suha Verba in early June 1942.
Slightly more detail on this can be found in Andrej Angrick's paper in Yad Vashem Studies XXVI (1998), pp 232-234. Perhaps oddly, Radu Ioanid's "The Holocaust in Romania: The Destruction of Jews and Gypsies Under the Antonescu Regime, 1940-1944" does not cover Sk-R, nor does Valdis O. Lumen's book dedicated to VoMi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiftusTheSixth (talk • contribs) 16:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in The Holocaust 

message: Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #70: "ISBN with wrong length", I removed the ISBN from the entry:
Zaffiri Gabriel, Ahnenerbe, the Academy of sciences of the SS, Nicholas Calabria Publisher, Pacts (ME), 2004 -101
I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBN on the Internet. No references anywhere to either the author or the title. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad ISBN
Talk:Gunilla Bielke

message: We do not know whether it was an act of personal loyalty or of duty that the queen held the king's hand when he was dying. In any case, the word is not specifically sourced and is not encyclopaedic in this case. A reader can make h own deduction, but it is not for WP to specify such things. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Loyal?

message: See SBL 13306 - Gunilla Bielke it states Died:1597-06-25
::About SBL
- 09:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SBL states death date 1597 06 25
Talk:Hamnet Shakespeare

message: consider including this logical conclusion: There is also the fact that Shakespeare clearly felt Hamlet/Hamnet was a good name, having named his son this, so would therefore be likely to have also wanted this name for his protagonist.92.24.136.100 (talk) 09:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is impossible to come to a "logical conclusion" based on speculations regarding authorial intent; there is no way (much as we may wish for one) to know how Shakespeare "felt" about the names Hamlet and Hamnet, so it is not a fact. Cfsibley (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: aesthetic name preference

message: Hamnet Shakespeare is almost completely lost in this article. This article seems to be about 15% Hamnet Shakespeare and 85% William Shakespeare and his works. An article about Hamnet should be mostly about Hamnet, not about how his death might have affected his dad's work. All of that speculation belongs elsewhere. If Hamnet is only notable for having a famous father and for dying young, does he even meet notability requirements? I know very little is known about Hamnet Shakespeare, and his impact on posterity hardly registers except by the possibility that his father might have reflected his own feelings of grief in his writings, and that it meant the end of his father's male line, but that's not about Hamnet - it's about Will. William Shakespeare and his writings are the subjects of other articles. I think mention of those speculations is appropriate for this article, but I think this article should be about Hamnet Shakespeare, and no longer than reliable information warrants. Either that or make this article about the possible impact of Hamnet's death on his father's writing, and incorporate the biographical information given as background. In its current state, I marvel that it still maintains GA status. Has it been reviewed lately? Dcs002 (talk) 22:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight- is this about Hamnet or Will's writing? Or scholars' opinions of Will's writing motivations? 

message: The article text gives no indication of how Hamnet died, however the page is included in :Category:16th-century deaths from plague (disease).  My understanding from a few minutes of searching is that the cause of his death is not known, but perhaps I have misunderstood.  If the cause of death is given in a reliable source, the article should include it; if it's not known reliably, the category should be removed.  Unfortunately, I'm not sure which is the case. 185.219.110.178 (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death
Talk:Jake Hancock

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license, if available
*Needs some copy editing into Wikipedia style
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded and references required
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
*External links to useful online resources should be added if available
Espresso Addict 00:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Jill Bennett (British actress)

message: Check the records at RADA (Royal Acedamy of Dramatic Art), and I think you'll find that that birth-year of 1931 is a bit later than the true one. 109.154.18.28 (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography gives her year of birth as 1926. https://www.oxforddnb.com/display/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-39924 GilesMartin1945 (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her age 

message: Not listed. Spicemix (talk) 21:27, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Owners'' role
Talk:Hans Eworth

message: I've expanded this and submitted a DYK. It is interesting that Cooper 2008 says that NPG 4861 (left) is likely from life and is the source of Eworth's other paintings of Mary while   Hearn Dynasties 1995 doesn't mention that portrait at all.  The Society of Antiquaries of London portrait LDSAL 336 (right) is also signed and dated 1554.  In both portraits Mary seems to be wearing the jewel with the pendant pearl La Pelegrina that was a wedding present from Philip II (and later from Richard Burton to Elizabeth Taylor but that's another story).  The Society of Anitquaries website says this portrait was finished before Mary's marriage to Philip on July 1554 - the supposed spring or summer date confuses KH and TB in Dynasties who comment on the heavy brocade and "fur wrap" (really fur-lined turned up "trumpet" sleeves [sigh]), and doesn't mention the theory that Mary is wearing her coronation robes in this portrait (the ones that would be remodeled for Elizabeth a few years later).  I believe there is something on the clothes in Janet Arnold, will check. 
We need a summary of Yates's deciphering of the allegory in the Luttrell portrait.  I have it, it's just hard to summarize in a sentence or two. - PKM (talk) 04:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Early history of fantasy

message: Even split off from history, this page is sadly lacking.  It is a list of "mythology of all nations."  It does not discuss how these works influenced the modern fantasy genre, and in many cases, it offers no reason to believe that they did.  
I will be adding such info and references and ruthlessly deleting anything for which I can find no support for its influence.
We probably should also organize the article not in the chronology that they appeared in history but in the order in which they influenced fantasy.  Goldfritha 17:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the info included here may be proper to put into history of fantasy, and some from that pages perhaps belongs here, but such matters should be viewed with care.  Goldfritha 18:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am puzzled as to the relationship between this article and the articles Fantasy, Fantasy literature, History of fantasy. The comment above would seem to indicate that this article was split from "History of fantasy". Is that correct? The history is unclear to me. My concern is with the possible duplication of editing effort here and the possibility that merges are needed. Rwood128 (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I've started to provide citations where I can and indicate where they are needed where I can't.  Note that merely providing a citation may not be sufficient; assertions have to be not only true but relevant to the genre fantasy.  Goldfritha 21:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm starting the purge.  Anything that lacks a reference or does not explain its relevance to the genre of fantasy may vanish.  Goldfritha 00:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also retitling the sections.  The sources of fantasy need not themselves be fantasy; many vital realistic works have been as large an influence on the genre as anything listed here.  Goldfritha 01:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: The regional/temporal split up doesn't do much for organization.  Development is more logically in the subgenres that became fantasy -- as for instance, action/adventure tales from Scott to Dumas.  Goldfritha 01:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: Are there any objections to changing the title of this article to "Early history of Fantasy literature" or "Beginnings of fantasy literature"? I have also suggested on Talk:History of fantasy that a new article might be created from that article entitled "History of twentieth century fantasy literature". Rwood128 (talk) 13:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title?
Talk:Jamake Highwater

message: Should the page and title be named after his false identity, when he was clearly shown as fraudulent? Unless he acquired a legal name change, his birth/european name should be used to refer to him, not his assumed racial name.
Usual policy is to refer to authors by their pen names. E.g. H.D., George Orwell, etc.
 Vizjim (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page/Naming debate 

message: Hi ! This article currently has a footnote saying "Cite error: The named reference fools was invoked but never defined", and I think that was introduced in this edit you made. What is the reference that you wanted to include? Based on looking around, possibly "Fool’s Gold: The Story of Jamake Highwater, the Fake Indian Who Won’t Die"? Happy to fix it, just not sure if that's right. Dreamyshade (talk) 04:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for seeing that and helping find the source again. You're right, I had been citing the article in Indian Country Today, and will add that and the link. It was most telling. I hope that ICTMN starts publishing again; was very sorry to see their announcement of suspending operations.Parkwells (talk) 15:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing reference
Talk:Justin Pierce

message: The articles states that 2 suicide notes were found but they aren't mentioned in the New York Times or Reuters write-ups. One can find them mentioned at IMDB & find a grave.  I'm deleting them from here.--TL36 (talk) 02:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed some of the wording so it's clear that he was not just crashing at a friends house or moved into his own place. But moved in a basement and crashed there, with a bunch of other kids. It's cited. 
Weareallspock (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Basement on 176 Street
Talk:Li Tobler

message: The Factbox says 'Actress, artist, model'. Is there any reference of her as an artist? We know she briefly ran an art-gallery. Valetude (talk) 22:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actress, artist, model? 

message: Re Darkday's request for citations in my new lede (29 November 2015): all these statements are represented in the main article. It is that material that you should be screening for 'weasel' or otherwise. Ledes do not need cites. They just need to summarise the article. Valetude (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, that was my mistake. However many of the sources are of questionable quality, but that's a topic for another day. Darkday (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for cites
Talk:Slovetzian

message: I made the article after watching the movie Beautician and the Beast. The fictional language "Slovetzian" was based on Slavic languages according to the film's producers and screenwriters. But I need credible evidence from any Wikipedia user who speaks a Slavic language and who has watched the movie to confirm this. (I don't speak any Slavic language whatsoever) Please allow the article to be "fixed" rather than be deleted. Sorry for starting the article with no evidence and any references. But hopefully I and/or other users will come up with credible evidence to add more now. Please allow time for any credible references to be added to this article in order to be allowed to stand and raise it up to Wikipedia standarts. Sorry for any problems caused.
Saguamundi
:OK, fair enough. I'll remove the speedy-delete tag and put an  tag on it asa a signal for editors to let you have some time. Just recognize that if you aren't able to find anything in the way of credible sources, the article may be nominated for deletion later. Let me know if I can help. Realkyhick 18:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not delete it. Please allow time for any credible references and evidence for the article to stand.
Talk:Lindsay Crosby

message: This article lays the fault of Lindsay's suicide at the feet of his father, Bing, but a lot of what is said (that Bing was abusive etc...) is contested, and as this article states: 
Lindsay Crosby, the youngest son of Bing Crosby from the famed crooner's first marriage, shot himself to death in a Las Virgenes apartment after learning that the inheritance he relied on to support his family was gone, a family spokeswoman said Tuesday.
'''
Just 11 days earlier, Crosby and his three brothers had been told by attorneys that the oil investments their late mother, Wilma Wyatt, made for them had gone broke, said Marilyn Reiss, spokeswoman for Lindsay's older brother, Gary.
For Lindsay, the news was the "last straw" after years of battling alcoholism, depression and the strain of living under the shadow of his famous father, Reiss said.
"Maybe if he had been a meaner person, he could have handled it," Reiss reported Gary Crosby saying after learning of his brother's death. "He was too sensitive."
'''
Crosby, 51, was found dead late Monday afternoon from a single gunshot wound to his head. A small-caliber rifle was nearby.
Crosby had been staying at the apartment on Bravo Lane while undergoing treatment for alcoholism in nearby Calabasas, Reiss said. He was due to return home to his third wife, Susan, and two sons in Sherman Oaks this weekend, she said. Crosby had two other sons by previous marriages.
Alcoholism was only one of many problems that seemed to dog Lindsay, Reiss said. He had a nervous breakdown in 1962, went through two divorces and was arrested several times for drunk driving and battery.
He had a lot of problems of his own that may, or may not have, been related to Bing.
24.229.118.199 (talk) 02:08, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason For Suicide
Talk:Heinrich Glarean

message: The article says that "It was in Cologne where he held a poem as a tribute to [the] Emperor". What does "to hold a poem to someone" mean? To declaim it? To dedicate it? Is this a German idiom that doesn't translate well? I think that "where" should probably be "that", or else "It was in Cologne where..." should be rewritten as something along the lines of "He was in Cologne when..." or "Cologne was where..." or the like, but before emending it I want to know what holding a poem to someone means. --Haruo (talk) 11:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd wording
Talk:Heinrich Isaac

message: "This motet rather ironically compares the Pope to a shepherd capable of soothing all of his flock and binding them together; Martin Luther was to commence the Protestant Reformation several years after its composition."
Where is the irony here? Is it the text of the motet which is ironic, or the fact that Luther began the reformation shortly afterwards? Not very clear. Zeisseng (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irony? 

message: A review of this article was request; I have placed my detailed review on the comments page.  The article is clearly B class; it could benefit from a complete works list. Magic♪piano 14:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Lynn Strait

message: Is he related to this group? --Tom (talk) 22:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: duh!, ok, so this is formerly Snot? Anyways, excuse my ignorance. The above article has Strait being arrested at an Ozzie show? ANyways, --Tom (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tons (band)]]
Talk:Marion Aye

message: Does anyone have a reliable source to support April 5, 1903, (or even the year 1903) as Aye's date of birth? The Rome News-Tribune/International News Service article cited in the article gives her age at death as 45, as does her obituary in the Los Angeles Times. That age would make her year of birth 1905 or 1906. I am inclined to think that 1903 is incorrect unless someone can provide a source that is valid by WP standards. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:05, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth/age at death
Talk:Max Linder

message: This section starts out with: "After Max Linder's death, Chaplin dedicated one of his films: "For the unique Max, the great master - his disciple Charles Chaplin"."  Which film did Chaplin dedicate to Linder?Jtyroler (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy section 
Talk:James Hatfield

message: One of the people who interviewed Vincent Bugliosi about The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder said that Hatfield was shot in his bathtub by a right-wing lunatic.  Was this just total misnformation?  The video is on YouTube.  --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suicide?
Talk:James Hazeldine

message: If "His last stage performance was that of the guilt-ridden Joe Keller in Arthur Miller's All My Sons" how could he have been taking part in a production of The Talking Cure when he died? CulturalSnow (talk) 03:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Last performance?

message: Did he really appear in twenty stage productions during 1983? Is that a record? Harfarhs (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage appearances
Talk:Michel Velleman

message: Wallach, Kurt (2020-03-04). Man's Inhumanity To Man. p. 606. ISBN 978-1-6781-0462-7. page 606 reads: "The non-Polish victims [of the Sobibor uprising] included ... magician Michel Velleman."
No other source indicates that Velleman died in October 1943, when the Sobibor uprising occurred. All the other sources I have found indicate that Velleman died on July 2, 1943. I am not sure where Wallach's citation or information comes from. I added this note to the citation on the main page, but wanted to flag it on the talk page as well. 
Thellomerca (talk) 04:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oct. 1943 death date cited in Kurt Wallach
Talk:James M. Gates Jr.

message: Um, why does this article exist ? I thought you had to have at least SOME references rather than racist jargon. Granted, soldiers were used in testing and they were affected, but one man saying things happened does not proof make. Chicken McFuggits (talk) 02:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, any poor person on the watchlist will have suffered from my string of, somewhat duplicative, updates.
I think there is sufficient sourcing between three good sources (the legal liability paper is a right nuisance to hunt down - anyone who finds a better link please put it in) to reasonably resolve the notability issues. There is some neutrality issues with the sources, but it's somewhat inevitable - it's not as if there is a counter-arguing set of sources saying it was moral to do this form of testing and there isn't any vaguely recent source that actually thinks it significantly enhanced US security. 
I've added an NPOV tag since the article clearly has issues on that front, even with a couple of the most notable examples removed by my eds. It will really need a wholescale reworking to properly resolve that, but unless someone else has the energy that can wait.
Some links on the campaigning bit would be good - it's not very detailed on any of the articles, but there are a couple of good links I'll go work them into each of the three of four relevant articles. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:55, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various Updates