Talk:Cheaper by the Dozen (1950 film)

message: :Image:Cheaperbythedozenoriginal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cheaperbythedozenoriginal.jpg

message: I think "experts" should be singular in the first sentence, as the mom has her own set of adjectives. PurpleChez (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storyline 

message: The car scene at the light is at the 6:57/1:12:18 minute version that is on YouTube. 
At that point the discussion was about being Noah and there was no hesitation in his response to the fellow at the traffic signal. The movie title came a bit later.
"Cheaper by the Dozen" was not mentioned until they arrived at the new house and were asked by the Letter Carrier first welcoming them to a nice place then asking "All the kids yours?" Frank Gilbreth responded with first saying you should have seen the one's we left behind. Some other conversation including Lillian and then the letter carrier asked "How do you ever feed them?" and to that, without hesitation, it is here that Frank Gilbert said "Ahh, they come Cheaper by the Dozen, you know." This was at about the 10:20 minute mark.
Crwillia (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in when the title was mentioned by Clifton Webb 

message: The number in the title is 12 ("a dozen").  That is true, but it's also true, that when all the children line up shortly into the movie, 10 are seen.  When they go to school, the father says that he has 11 children. A baby is born afterwards, supposedly completing the dozen.  However, in later scenes, at most 11 children appear as part of the family.  In the final scene, the photograph clearly shows 11 Gilbreth children.
47.140.183.163 (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you proposing a change to the article? If you just want to point out a "goof", you'd need to provide a reliable source establishing that this is considered significant in some manner. DonIago (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

text: If you read the second book, Belles on their toes, you will see a footnote that Mary, next to eldest, died of diphtheria in 1912. Thus there were 12 children, yes, but never all alive at the sime time. See the article Cheaper by Eleven?   . Franskraler (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's be honest about the size of the family vs. the title of the film 

message: I'm not trying to be prudish, but this article actually states "Karma is a bitch!"  This doesn't seem to be in keeping with the encyclopedic tone that Wikipedia seeks to maintain... this should be addressed when someone has the time...— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.82.7 (talk • contribs) 
:That was added by an IP who inserted a large amount of text into the plot summary. I can't speak for the virtues of their other edits, but as you noted, their tone was somewhat lacking, and I have my doubts as to the usefulness and accuracy of the rest of their edit. That said, I'm curious as to why you didn't just fix it yourself? Cheers. DonIago (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article uses the word "bitch"?