lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Buzz (DC)

message: Buzz was a very important part of the east coast rave culture. It was also a weekly event that brought to Washington, DC the best talent in the world.
:Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please see WP:NOTE and provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Thanks. --Evb-wiki (talk) 16:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Blood–testis barrier

message: What does it let through?
--142.157.70.8 (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

message: So my question here for any medical doctor (I cannot find the answer online) is how long can sperm live in the bloodstream?  The question came up because I donate blood like clockwork every 8 weeks, but I had a vasectomy 4 years ago.  Assuming I fall under normal odds, I should have sperm in my bloodstream along w/antibodies for those sperm.  Would it be possible that I donate blood and some female w/trama injuries receives my blood but gets pregnant from that as well?
ThoHug (talk) 14:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetime of sperm in the bloodstream? 

message: Endocrine Rev doi:10.1210/er.2014-1101 JFW | T@lk 14:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:Advice (constitutional law)

message: From what basis is the advice of the prime minister of the UK to the queen more than simply "advice" - from what piece of legislation is it a binding instruction? Is it not just a matter of convention, and conventions can of course be broken. 82.10.108.49 (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think that 'The Veiled Sceptre: Reserve Powers of Heads of State in Westminster Systems' by Anne Twomey would be a really useful source (if not The Source) for this page, particularly chapter 2. Just in case anybody had a spare couple of minutes and access to that book! FollowTheTortoise (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  'The Veiled Sceptre: Reserve Powers of Heads of State in Westminster Systems' by Anne Twomey
Talk:Mikulin AM-42

message: Figures given yield 45,842cc (2797 cuin). Or does it have the articulated setup as in the AM-35? Those numbers give 46,928cc (2864 cuin). 2001:56A:F414:D300:1889:A33F:9A0D:E00F (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Displacement
Talk:Raymond L. Garthoff

message: initial page. there are a ton of scholarly papers to be listed. & a lot of formatting to be done on the books list. Not to mention the need to find some bio facts somewhere. A truly great American scholar!  Godspeed John Glenn! Will 16:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would an interview with Raymond Garthoff from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_00E3B03573E84AA183E7C4C3711437CD (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy?
Talk:2002 Überlingen Mid-Air Collision

message: I am re-adding my split request for the information about Peter Nielsen's death to be added to a separate page (the split template has been moved to the section about Peter's death. The article could reference everything in that section and about the fact that he was the ATC officer on duty at the time of the accident.--Vreddy92 (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Avro Ashton

message: The Ashton flew "nearly a year before the Comet"?  Nonsense.  It first flew about a year _after_ the DH Comet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.11.223 (talk) 19:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is indeed an inaccurate article.  The first Ashton flew as stated in 1950, more than a year after the first flight of the Comet. The potential confusion may arise from the Ashton's predecessor, the Tudor 8, which did in fact fly with jet engines earlier than the Comet - although calling the Tudor 8 an airline is stretching it a bit, it was little more than a flying testbed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.241.172 (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points, article now revised. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Solenodon

message: Roughly where does this fit into the tree of life? Is it very basal? Evercat (talk) 18:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As Soricomorphs, they are fairly basal amongst the living placental mammals, but then, so are shrews. Anaxial (talk) 19:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. So it's in the Laurasiatheria. And I see from Lecointre and Le Guyader's book that it's in what they call the "Eulipotyphles"... Evercat (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lao name

message: Laotians have polysyllabic names
http://books.google.com/books?id=QQn0GNFehA8C&pg=PA51#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polysyllabic 

message: Jaydan 2600:100A:B025:F59F:BDBB:FA5E:10B9:262 (talk) 21:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Kaipen

message: These two articles are the same plant. The content should be combined and placed on the genus page.  --Nessie (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Cladophora]]
Template talk:Oakland Athletics

message: Add the view, discuss, edit to a new roster box I create.............
Also, there is no roster there after I click edit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dshibshm (talk • contribs) 01:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I? 

message: Might it be a good idea to replace Philadelphia/Kansas City/Oakland Athletics in the title of the infobox with simply The Athletics?  --Xyzzyva (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philadelphia/Kansas City/Oakland Athletics
File talk:Welland Main Street Bridge - 2nd Canal.jpg

message: This image is believed to be public domain under the following criteria;
* It is created by an anonymous or unknown photographer
* It is dated 1870.  
* Picture is taken in Canada.  Under Canadian Copyright law, the term of copyright is life of author +50 years, which is definately the case.
* Although it can not be absolutely confirmed that the author has been dead 100 years (as required by the Wikipedia copyright tag selections and US law), it is probable.
* The image has no commercial value and is useful only for scholarly research.
* A differently cropped scan of the same original image is posted on the internet by the Welland Public Library.
It is therefore believed that no person or entity has legal rights to this image and is included as public domain.
 Radtek67 (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cheam Range

message: Something worth noting is this statement: "The western peaks in the range - Cheam, Lady, Baby Munday and Stewart, are known in areas of the Fraser Valley where there are visible, as the "Four Sisters"."  While Cheam and Lady are for sure easily visible from the valley, I don't believe Baby Munday is, especially considering its western neighbor, Knight Peak, is higher than it and would more than likely block it from view.  As for Stewart, I am unsure whether it is visible.  It might be, or may not.  But either way, what I'd love to know is, why would Knight not be part of the "Four Sisters"?  I've actually never heard of the whole Four Sisters thing before other than here so if someone could educate me on that, it would certainly help.
By the way: If anyone reading this gets a chance, go climb up the Knight Peak trail.  It comes off of the old section of Airplane Creek Road, crosses Airplane Creek, and goes up really steeply into the basin below Knight and Baby Munday Peak.  From there you can directly reach the summit of Knight (which I did), and also access Baby Munday (class 3 scramble, fairly exposed I hear), Stewart Peak, and more than likely The Still.  You can actually summit Knight, Baby Munday & Stewart in one day, although I only got to the top of Knight since I had some time limitations.  Seriously though, check it out sometime...  I'd be happy to provide more info to anyone whose interested.
AndrewEnns (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Four Sisters" 
Talk:The Concert (Vermeer)

message: In its 20th-anniversary coverage of the heist, CBS reports that this painting is worth $200 million.  For such a valuable work, this article contains precious little description or commentary on it! 71.219.237.212 (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes any piece of art – or any object, for that matter – worth $200 million?  It's simply a matter of economics (i.e., what some buyer is willing to pay for it).  In this case, the piece is 350 years old ... and the artist (Johannes Vermeer) "is now acknowledged as one of the greatest painters of the Dutch Golden Age".  Those facts seem reason enough to support the value placed on the painting.  Thanks.  Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:28, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  For being an unrecovered work worth as much as $200million the "provenance" is simply ludicrous.  How about a proper provenance from 1696 on?  And perhaps an explanation why the singer is so uncharacteristically unclear, muted and un-Vermeer-like?184.148.67.99 (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What makes it worth $200 million?
Talk:Reavey and O'Dowd killings

message: Nothing in this article about the appeal.--Vintagekits (talk) 17:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Court of Human Rights 

message: John Weir named Robert McConnell - a UDR man and Glenanne gang member - as having been the leading gunman in the Reavey killings, and the description Anthony gave afterwards roughly matched that of McConnell although the latter was masked. I think it should go in the article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added him. How does it look?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert McConnell
Talk:Garbh Eilean

message: From main list -
Garbh Eilean, Sutherland -
"Garbh Eilean at the entrance to Loch Glencoul is now joined to the mainland by both the Kylesku Bridge to the south and its associated roadworks to the north."
--MacRusgail (talk) 17:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2nd added; 1 & 3 expanded - tidal island west of N Gigha. If you click the GR, then first "Find this location" you get a map. Finavon (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two more?
Talk:Michiel van Kempen

message: This article is an obvious case of self promotion by the author, as the length (greater than that of authors of far greater importance) strongly suggests that mr. Van Kempen himself wrote this text. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy, and therefore the article should be considered for appropriate editing or removal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.31.217.231 (talk) 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Huie's Sermon

message: The film ends with the text Wenn der Mensch etwas mit der Sonne zu schaffen hätte, wäre sie heute nicht aufgegangen. Can anybody translate? Staecker (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "If mankind had anything to do with the sun, it wouldn't have risen today." +Angr 09:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German text?
Talk:Ablepharus budaki

message: Doesn't look like there is one of Flickr. The uploader of one with this binomial says it's actually a related species. Richard001 (talk) 07:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: New image now uploaded from iNaturalist. Loopy30 (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo useful
Talk:France Gélinas

message: I have made an edit to this page to reflect the addition of a third grandchild. 69.60.237.19 (talk) 20:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a reliable source for this information, why would it even be interesting, let alone verifiable? Bearcat (talk) 06:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Preiss RHJ-7

message: The AR listed in the reference (21.6) is incorrect, since by definition AR = b^2/S, or 17.22^2/13 = 22.81. I made the correction on this Wikipedia entry. Raymondwinn (talk) 05:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected aspect ratio
Talk:Preiss RHJ-8

message: The specifications listed prior to my revision were obtained from a California owner, who modified his glider in several respects, one of which was to gain concurrence from the designer to fly his unit at 1100 pounds gross weight (design is 1000 lb); this was obtained by agreeing to use a lower maximum maneuvering g-factor (from 12 g, down to 9.5 g). Since this is a personal thing, on a homebuilt unit, it is OK (i.e. anything goes on a homebuilt), but I don't think we should use it in the Design Specification table. I have therefore modified the table accordingly. Raymondwinn (talk) 05:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Specification revision
Talk:The Sims 2 neighbourhoods

message: This page is deleted on a regular basis! I once made a request for anyone who wishes to delete this then to leave me a message however as no one has done so this page will be put back up!
If everyone deleted something on wikipedia that they thought shouldnt be there then there will be no wikipedia! Take the time out to message people about their articles, as they have taken the time to write one in the first place!
:if its deleted on a regular basis then its an indication it shouldn't be here. Recreating deleted material is against wikipedia policy. These articles are deleted because we're not a game guide or fan site. WP:NOT we're also not an indiscriminate collection of information and there is no indication that these neighbourhoods have any notability outside of the game themselves.--Crossmr (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Template talk:Pennsylvania Senate

message: I changed the format for the PA Senate District pages. Now the links use the cardinal numbers instead of the ordinal numbers. This makes the page titles much simpler.
The general format for district pages is now "Pennsylvania Senate, District XXX." I moved the existing pages under the old naming system, so nothing is lost. This allows the use of a succession box template for state representatives (Template:PASenateSuccession_box) --RedShiftPA (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * No more redlinks! --RedShiftPA (talk) 22:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructured link formats
Talk:Preiss RHJ-9

message: The previous specs were taken from the Sailplane Directory page, and contain some errors. I have corrected the metric/english conversions and the calculation for aspect ratio. Raymondwinn (talk) 06:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Specification revision
Talk:Bartini Beriev VVA-14

message: One crazy aircraft after another is showing up with terrible pictures and (in this case) one cited source.  C'mon guys.  This is nonsense.Tgm1024 (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does have very few sources. Is one credible source enough? Youtube is not a credible source, but here ya go:  @35sec did not take off from water @3:35. Which other aircraft articles do you consider to be misleading? TGCP (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There seems to be a concerted effort to pretend that many concept aircraft even existed.
Talk:Starr Bumble Bee II

message: Can someone get a picture of Bumble Bee II? WCLL HK 20:39(UTC+8)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WCLL HK (talk • contribs) 12:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

message: I believe that it is confusing for the main image of the article to display an aircraft that is not the subject of the article, but has a similar name. A reader who does not notice the difference of "I" instead of "II" in the caption could think that the photo is of the Bumble Bee II, which is a different aircraft. This photo belongs in the "aircraft on public display" section, so I moved it there. A better main photo is the world record certificate, which I moved to be the main photo.
Max Winds (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Change 

message: The article says the Bumble Bee I flew on April 2nd to get it's record. Should it be the Bumble Bee II?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatGuy3150 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Bumble Bee? 

message: The current infobox image is the image of the Starr Bumble Bee II's Guiness world record. Shouldnt the image of the aircraft in the article be the infobox image and the record put in the article? A-37Dragonfly (talk) 01:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem that has already been noted is that the aircraft image is of the Bumble Bee I where the scope/subject of the article is the Bumble Bee II. If the article was moved to Starr Bumble Bee and reworked it could cover both aircraft, we could have the aircraft image in the infobox and everyone would be happy. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I see, so the image of the aircraft in the article is the Starr Bumble Bee II's predecessor and there is no uncopyrighted image of the real Starr Bumble Bee II as the only image was copyrighted. A-37Dragonfly (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Images of the Bumble Bee II are available and they could be uploaded as non-free as the aircraft was destroyed and there is no way of obtaining a free image. The images of the Bumble Bee I are free and better quality being modern/digital photos, the red link solution would be better IMHO. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 07:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo change?
Talk:PZL Bielsko SZD-55

message: The following sentence from this article makes no sense (it's not even a proper sentence):
"Klaus Holighaus, one of the finest manufacturers of gliders (family of Nimbus and Discus) stated that if using a glass fiber technology PZL Bielsko factory gained weight less than gliders were used in the construction of carbon fiber and Kevlar that means that developed a new technology."
Editors of this page, please fix this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.101.136.224 (talk) 23:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Tupolev Tu-2000

message: Article says top speed is Mach 24 in space... I think this article should define the speed of sound in a vacuum to ensure no-one misunderstands this information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.35.235 (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed? 

message: The specifications section states that the powerplant was planned as 6 × liquid hydrogen with liquid oxygen oxidizer turbo jet/scramjet.
But a jet engine - using conventional terminology - uses atmospheric oxygen as oxidiser; if you're carrying your oxidiser, then you're a rocket engine (if you see what I mean).
Something's not right. I don't have the book used as the supposed source of this claim.
Anyone?
Michael F 1967 (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powerplant
Talk:Internet censorship in the United Kingdom

message: I've added a subsection describing the government's intention to enforce age verification on websites under the Digital Economy Act 2017. It's still unclear whether this will actually happen, but they have passed the necessary legislation, and repeatedly stated that this will be rolled out Real Soon Now. According to inews.co.uk, "Any porn site that fails to comply with the news[sic] rules will face a fine of up to £250,000, or a blanket block by UK internet service providers."
-- The Anome (talk) 08:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age verification 

message: https://www.itproportal.com/2013/11/29/uk-isps-forced-to-block-extremist-content/. This should be added to the article. Anything even having a whiff of being pro-fascism and so forth is blocked in the UK, this can be very quickly ascertained by anyone in the UK.--Phil of rel (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISPs are being forced to block 'extremist' content
Talk:Horse Heaven Hills

message: The Horse Heaven Hills are the scene of the climactic battle between the forces of the Church Universal and Triumphant, known as CUT, and the alliance called the Kingdom of Montical in the novel _Lord of Mountains_ in the series called the Embervese by Steven Stirling. The geography of the hills is of some importance to that choice.
Would it be good to mention this in the article itself? 65.79.173.135 (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important in a Series of Novels 
Talk:Griffon Aerospace

message: This article needs work! Putting it on my "to do" list
Archtransit (talk) 23:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

message: * Griffon Aerospace Introduces the Extended Range Outlaw UAV
*Inside View - very very basic company listing but at least provides third party confirmation of some basic facts
*Drone Delay: FAA Will Miss Deadline Pushing Back Commercial Timeline - looks relevant and recent but again only really confirms line of business and location
It is not clear to me that there is really enough information in third party reliable sources to have an entry about this company.  Significant edits have been made by a SPI who appears to me to be a former employee of the company who made the edits while an employee of the company.  The vast majority of those edits seem straightforward enough, though.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some potentially useful references 
Talk:British Aerospace HOTOL

message: Somewhere or other I read an article where somebody from the British aerospace company that worked on it said that HOTOL was a response to the NASP. He said something along the lines of 'we didn't see how NASP could ever work, but we couldn't afford to get left behind, and we couldn't afford to do the scramjet stuff, so HOTOL was the next best thing. Eventually we found out the NASP was mostly a bluff as part of the Reagan 'Star Wars' program and the Americans probably never expected it to work either, but by then we'd spent millions on HOTOL. You'd have thought the b******s could have told us!!!'.
It sounds pretty plausible, the timelines match up. That's the best I can remember it, it was in one of the aerospace magazines. Anyone have a referenced? I'd love to add it to the article if anyone has it.
So it was all a bit dumb to start with, but the follow-on Skylon concept seems much better sorted.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 22:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just moved the article to a new title per aircraft guidelines, before I remembered the spacecraft convention. But is a spaceplane an aircraft or a spacecraft? So I opened a wider discussion about the title of this and similar spaceplane articles here, to which contributions are welcome. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:MDM MDM-1 Fox

message: Is the "Swift Aerobatic Display Team" outstanding? Would it be reasonable to link to all aerobatic teams, and display and/or competition aerobatic pilots, that fly Foxes, or some of them? Are there particular criteria? (See also: Talk:S-1 Swift) --Vierzehn (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)