lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of double albums

message: As discussed on Talk:Double album, I have moved the list of double albums to its own article. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I was not altogether happy with the way "Band – Album (1900) (19×CD)" looked - too many parens in a row.  The "standard" album listing methods here on Wikipedia seem to be "use ndashes to separate stuff", so I changed them all to use an ndash before, and removed the parens around, the platter count, ala "Band – Album (1900) – 19×CD".  A little easier to read, to my eye. — Wwagner 17:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More formatting changes 

message: If they're not even notable enough to have a band article, I'll remove them until they are:
*De Novo Dahl – Cats & Kittens (2005)
*Grobschnitt – Ballermann (1974)
*My Dad is Dead – The Taller You Are, The Shorter You Get (1989) – 2×LP
— Wwagner 14:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Double-redlink entries

message: I see many compilations in the article (frex already both Abba entries, and the whole V/A section). Is there any specific reason for their inclusion? Anyone, artists or not, can put together a 11873 CD compilation with relativ ease so I don't see much point in including them. But should they be outright banned or might collections of otherwise (mostly) unreleased music still count?
The typical live album from concert Y or tour X has a better case for being considered a whole, but musically they're also offen not much different from compilations... any thoughts on this, folks? --Tropylium 13:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why they shouldn't be included.  A good bulk of the listings here are comps, live or otherwise.  As far as the V/A listings, though anybody can create a comp, most don't, so the inclusion of the ones which are there seems pretty legit to me.  The Saturday Night Fever soundtrack, for one example, is the best selling soundtrack album in history, which definitely warrants inclusion. — Wwagner 08:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Compilations

message: Shall we remove studio and live albums etc. and just leave it with studio albums - it would be a lot of a better list and the list goes more incomplete with compilations (UK NOW albums etc.) which aren't included than with studio albums. Signed and timed: --92.237.84.183 (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studio albums 

message: Hi, I don't understand the value of the "Can fit on one CD" parentheticals as submitted by IP 67.83.61.170 here, for example. It seems a trivial inclusion and a magnet for other cruft. Further, the additions are unsourced, so we're essentially relying on original research for the content and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. For these reasons I'm cutting the content until a consensus for its inclusion can be established. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Can fit on one CD" 

message: Christina Aguilera’s Back to Basics double album should be added.  AndrewA1988 (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back to Basics
Talk:Francis turbine

message: Francis type units cover a wide head range, from 20 meters to 700 meters and their output varies from a few kilowatt to 1000 megawatt. Their size varies from a few hundred millimeters to about 10 meters.
Topology of the runner varies with the head.  
Runners operate at constant rotating speed. Power varies according to net head and guide vane openings.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Demers (talk • contribs) 15:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: The article says "water wheels are inefficient" which is an overstatement that distorts historical fact.  Early undershot waterwheels were grossly inefficient, usually less than 30%, but the later period overshot and backshot steel Fitz wheels and the Poncelet wheel have efficiencies comparable with the Francis turbine at considerably lower cost of manufacture.  Unfortunately these innovations came after the turbine revolution, industrialists were not yet concerned about the excessive fish kill of bladed turbines, and (in the case of the Fitz wheels) costs of impoundment and diversion to a wheel are higher, so those designs were not widely adopted and have only recently re-entered production for environmental reasons.  The Poncelet wheel is very nearly a turbine set sideways, although obviously it does not have axial flow like a Francis turbine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.180.229 (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  misstatement concerning water wheels 

message: thanks for giving me a chance to grow myself,I've a question about vertical shaft turbine that is there any loss in the velocity of water flow through turbine blades when the motion is just horizontal as compared to vertical in horizontal shaft turbine pls clear my topic(lalit gandhi)>(27-may-2011)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalit gandhi (talk • contribs) 05:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertical-shaft question 

message: While the articles states (with no source given) that Francis turbines operate in a water head from 40 to 600 m, I think this just holds for large installations. 
On a Czech website dedicated to small hydroelectric power plants the head is given as 2 to 8 meters (for horizontal axis turbine) 
 and 0,5 to 5 metres (for vertical axis turbine) 
.
--Jvs (talk) 08:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Jvs: Free feel to fix it yourself if you can add reliable sources. In my opinion, a technical book about water turbine design would be the ideal source. I would say that a website about a water turbine manufacturer is not a reliable source, but it is still better that nothing. Mario Castelán Castro (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water head 

message: What is the point of these sections? A load of equations and diagrams with no attempt to explain what any of the terms mean and no links to other articles which might help explain it. Yet another typically badly written technical Wikipedia article which seems aimed at those who already know rather than enlightening anyone who doesn't.
130.246.57.110 (talk) 08:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blade efficiency & Degree of reaction
Talk:Languages of Uganda/to do

message: # The article needs to be restructured. The current division (into Linguistic divisions, Languages, Language policy) is not a very intuitive one. 
# A little more on language policy, including a historical perspective
# Languages in education and in the media
# History: how did the peoples and their languages get there in the first place? Should touch on the Nilotic flow throughout Eastern Africa (in several phases), the Bantu expansion, the position of the Kuliak languages, the relatively recent Luo expansions (see e.g. Luo history), the development of centralized Bantu kingdoms and Bantu/Luo contacts.
Last update: — mark ✎ 11:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Matt Fong

message: The Chinese name of Matt Fong is relevant because Mr. Fong is active in the Chinese American community, is fluent in Chinese, and personally uses his Chinese name. This is what the middle initial "K" stands for. His Chinese name was not simply invented by the media. Being American does not mean he is monolingual. --Jiang 08:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But what if he speaks six or seven languages? Do we put his obviously American name (Fong is just as American as Smith or Jones) into each of them? My family name is used in Spain with an accent but not here, so I don't sign it with an accent. I have a chop I bought in China with my name in characters: Should I use it in an article about myself? GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of Chinese name 

message: Chinese: 鄺傑靈; pinyin: Kuàng Jiélíng) Badagnani (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just removed unilaterally (with no discussion) 

message: Is there a better photo available? This one is extremely unflattering. V. Joe (talk) 16:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph question
Talk:March Fong Eu

message: Deceased?  There is a crypt in Oakland's "Mountain View Cemetery" with her name inscribed thereupon.
Died last week, page has been updated. obits at electionlawblog, ballot access news, http://ballots.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-long-march-of-fong-eu.html
50.90.215.156 (talk) 18:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Still living?

message: March Fong Eu sounds nothing like Jiang Yuegui. The Chinese name was not given to her by the media. Given her activites overseas, the name is most likely being used by her. --Jiang 08:15, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (Chinese: 江月桂, pinyin: Jiāng Yuèguì)  Badagnani (talk) 03:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Just removed unilaterally (with no discussion)

message: Eu v Democratic Party, 1989, is a landmark election law case.
http://ballots.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-long-march-of-fong-eu.html
479 U.S. 1024 (1987),  Eu v. S.F. Cty. Democratic Cent. Comm., 489 U.S. 214 (1989).
A State's broad power to regulate the time, place, and manner of elections
"does not extinguish the State's responsibility to observe the limits established by the First Amendment rights of the State's citizens."
 Indeed, the First Amendment "has its fullest and most urgent application" to speech uttered during a campaign for political office. etc.
-50.90.215.156 (talk) 18:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs update on her federal and state supreme court cases
Talk:Virtua Tennis (video game)

message: I think this article needs to be cleaned up a bit -- should it not be used as the page for the entire SERIES of Virtua Tennis games rather than just the first?
It seems rather silly to have separate pages for each of the games, and could easily be expanded to show information for the games on the N-Gage, PC and future releases etc.
I would gladly tidy this up and add extra information, just wanted to know what everyone thinks.
:You should do it similar to how the Namco Museum series is formatted. - Hbdragon88 06:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I noticed that this article as well as the articles for other Virtua Tennis games in the series are being edited with nonsense information by an unregistered editor with an apparently Indonesian IP. These edits include:
* King and Master nationalities as Indonesian and Malasian, respectively, when their nationalities are clearly not shown in the videogames.
* Additional fictitious players: David Beale and Frank Peterson (anybody heard of them? where does this come from?)
* Changing/Swapping players player's skills.
Is there a way to range-block these IPs, maybe? (180.254.21.111, 180.254.44.108, 125.166.224.69 and 180.246.61.249)
Cpfig (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense Editing
Talk:Bruno of Cologne

message: Having read this article, I question whether it uses the proper neutral point of view necessary for an encyclopedia article. I refer readers to the American Heritage Dictionary's definition 2 at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hagiography.  WeeWillieWiki (talk) 21:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved.  – robertsky (talk) 21:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 February 2024
Talk:Spiritual experience

message: The name of Jung's patient would be an a good inclusion.  Roland Hazard207.157.121.50 09:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Seeing as  reverted the redirect to Religious Experience claiming that they are different things, are there any other comments regarding this? I personally agree with the redirect, and have reverted 's change as two separate articles do not need to exist. Samuel Tarling (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Rhinoplasty (EP)

message: Rhinoplasty is the eighth album:
# Suck On This
# Frizzle Fry
# Sailing The Seas Of Cheese
# Miscellanious Debris
# Pork Soda
# Tales From The Punchbowl
# The Brown Album
# Rhinoplasty
# Antipop
# Animals Should Not Try To Act Like People
preceding unsigned comment by JAStewart
:Actually, Rhinoplasty is considered an EP. Slicing 17:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey guys, I have a Rhinoplasty VHS videotape, but I don't see a reference for it anywhere on Wikipedia, am I not looking in the right place or something? It's a live show, sprinkled with other stuff. Hanz ofbyotch (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhinoplasty Videocassette
Talk:Be Careful What You Wish For...

message: Please make sure neither party is breaching WP:3RR when editting this article. Doing so will result in a temporary block. The two parties have se far reverted it twice each. Can you disuss changes here before editting that particular phrase? Thank you. --Celestianpower hablamé 17:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  3RR
Talk:Chhaupadi

message: I removed the reference to cows being in the shed as neither external link mentions this and it seems to contradict the food restrictions.  --JBellis (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cows 

message: I think this article is not nearly as sparse as when the notice was posted. If no objections, I'll remove in a week.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HereAndSometimesThere (talk • contribs) 18:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the box now. HereAndSometimesThere (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the translation suggestion box at the top 

message: Hi there, I added a section about community action against the practice, as there are community and organizational initiatives working towards ending the practice of chhaupadi (I currently know of SRHR initiatives, social mindset change initiatives, the handing out of sustainable menstrual products, etc, being implemented via the NGO sector in addition to government action). However, this section might be better off if combined into the "Legislation" chapter - which could be expanded and redefined a bit. Essentially, the actions and challenges about the stigma and how it is being addressed should be incorporated into the article in addition to legal issues (there have been many initiatives happening in-country for years). 
Any opinions on this? HereAndSometimesThere (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a new section (but should it be combined with another section?) 

message: We are looking to make some edits to this important article and add some updated information to make it more comprehensive. If you have any feedback or suggestions please let us know. Any feedback or thoughts to improve the article would be appreciated! Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lnjd2022 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making this article more comprehensive and updated
Talk:Computer-assisted proof

message: I find this statement interesting: "Interestingly, this controversy within mathematics is occurring at the same time as questions are being asked in the physics community about whether twenty-first century theoretical physics is becoming too mathematical, and leaving behind its experimental roots." but there is no reference for it.  I'm not sure that it NEEDS a reference, but I'm just curious for further reading if anyone has any information on this "controversy".
Jackkoho (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: theoretical physics statement

message: Should this article be merged with Automated theorem proving?
S Sepp 14:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, but we can probably merge with Interactive theorem proving Outs 10:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge?

message: OK, that's expanded this to a reasonably-sized stub. Can someone with more knowledge in this area improve and polish this article, please? -- Anon.
I'm not a huge fan of the body of this article. It's a discussion of arguments against computer aided proofs and counterarguments.-Bob  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.157.200.63 (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: improve please

message: I have removed Seventeen or Bust from this page because it's not a computer-assisted proof, per se, in the sense that once the necessary prime numbers have been found the proof is easy to state and verify succinctly without the aid of a computer; it's merely being used to accelerate the search phase. Dcoetzee 23:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Seventeen or Bust

message: The list of computer assisted theorem ends in 1998. Any idea what happened? Are mathematicians getting distracted playing with iphones now? Any ideas about the dry spell? Thanks. History2007 (talk) 11:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dry spell?
Category talk:People educated at Harrow School

message: Request for population completed Oli 10:25, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hard to believe Wikipedia only has 33 articles about Old Harrovians. I should think it is more like 330. Bhoeble 16:47, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote this list using the 'what links here' to Harrow School tool on the assumption that any article on an OH of any value would mention their school. You are right that ther must be others, but I am unable to find them. --Oli 08:17, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:2005 International Rules Series

message: Does anyone have a source for the Ireland 6, Australia 5, 2 drawn series record? In my understanding, recently series have been decided on aggregate score, so Australia won in 2003. I seem to remember that the same applied in 1998, so Ireland won that series.
:A quick Google search seems to confirm my memory, for example:    JPD 10:33, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The word used in Gaelic Football is 'panel'. --Kgaughan 00:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I have no idea actually... --J L C Leung 21:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Christian theology

message: I am all for a "Christian mythology" category, but theology is not mythology.  Technically speaking, theology is what Christians have developed based on the Biblical narrative (which does contain some "myth", from a technical standpoint) regarding belief.  Theology is related in some ways to mythology, but the two are not the same.  Please discuss here before making these kinds of changes.  Thanks...KHM03 11:13, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category: Christian mythology

message: I'm cleaning up Wikipedia:Orphaned articles. I'm not sure where to add the follow:
* Adoption (theology)
Any help appreciated. meatclerk 16:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned articles
Talk:Non-Trinitarian churches

message: I see there is also a "Nontrinitarianism" page, but I would like to keep the ancient and the modern non-Trinitarians apart. --MacRusgail 11:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest a move to Modern non-trinitarianism or Post-reformation non-trinitarianism. Jacob Haller 02:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The "common characteristics" aren't common with the ancient non-trinitarian churches, and may not be common among all the modern ones. Jacob Haller 17:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

message: This page should be merged with nontrinitarianism for the following reasons:
*Overlap - There is a lot of information listed here that is already covered by the nontrinitarianism article, such as lists of organizations and history of nontrinitarianism; or that should be covered in the nontrinitarianism article, such as etymology of the term "nontrinitarian".
*Text - This article is a stub and, while numerous edits have taken place, the article has existed since 2005 and still has not reached the point where it is without factual inaccuracies or had a single fact cited.  In order to facilitate a more complete discussion of the contents of this article, combining it with the information contained in the nontrinitarianism article would be beneficial to improving the topic.
*Context - Without an understanding of what "nontrinitarianism" means, then a discussion of "nontrinitarian churches" would be meaningless.  Furthermore, trying to include a description of nontrinitarianism in the present article would be rehashing information already contained in the article with which I am proposing a merger.
All of these are founded on the information contained in the Wikipedia guide to Merging and Moving Pages.  Discuss.  Lioux (talk) 11:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Nontrinitarianism"
Talk:Uridium

message: :The Spectrum version seems to exist in "Uridium" and "Uridium Plus" versions - what was the difference between the two? Bastie 14:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uridium+

message: I seem to remember that this game - as well as Morpheus - recognised when it ran on a C128 and increased the processor speed to 2 MHz when the raster lines of the bottom screen frame were being drawn, but unfortunately, I don't have any sources and gave away my C128 a long time ago.
134.176.25.80 07:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  C128 with 2Mhz? 

message: Removed from the article:
The computer was later able to perform parallax scrolling, most notably in the Sensible Software title Parallax, which was released a few months after Uridium.
I originally wrote the section about the Commodore 64's hardware not supporting parallax scrolling. What I meant by this was that the Commodore 64's graphics chip, the VIC-II, does not support parallax scrolling natively. It is possible to do a simulation of parallax scrolling in software, exactly as Braybrook did in Uridium, and no doubt was done in Parallax too. However, the way the paragraph above is worded makes it sound like the Commodore 64's hardware somehow changed to be able to support parallax scrolling natively, in a few months' time, no less. Now in the current time where graphics cards get more and more features all the time, this would be possible, but back in the 1980s it was nothing of the sort. Computers' graphics chips were an integral part of them, not exchangeable accessories like they are now. JIP | Talk 16:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you are also the right person to receive the criticism. I don't know what you've been taking, but C64 doesn't have background graphics either. --213.130.254.217 (talk) 06:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Later able to perform parallax scrolling" 

message: "Mindscape decided to take an easier route by recycling an older, relatively obscure game"
This doesn't make any sense. I suggest saying exactly what they did, rather than leave it up to the reader's guess. My guess is that they revamped Uridium, but it's not an obscure game, so please correct this sentence. --213.130.254.217 (talk) 06:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: I added Redirect from "The Last Starfighter (video game)".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinobody (talk • contribs) 06:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Last Starfighter 

message: I've added references to Andrew Braybrook, who designed and wrote the original on the C64. There are various other mistakes (the original game had 10 levels IIRC, not 15), but I've left them unchanged for now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wedgeski (talk • contribs) 13:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Braybrook
Talk:WULM

message: The problem with calling this article WULM-AM is that these are not the call letters of the station.  However, because other (non-radio) uses on Wikipedia of radio call letters are possible, the emerging standard is to use (AM), (FM), or (TV) in parentheses where those letters do not form part of the call letters.  Please consider moving this article back to WULM (AM). -- SwissCelt 12:02, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled