lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monmouth (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The constituency was created in 1918. The county was previously divided between three county constituencies (Northern, Southern, and Western) and one borough constituency (Monmouth Burghs). The county constituency returning two MPs was abolished at and earlier date (1832?). Laurel Bush 10:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries 

message: The election results for the 1970s refer to Sir John Stradling Thomas as "John Thomas", but for the 1980s go with "John Stradling Thomas" which is also how he is referred to in other parts of this article. I think for consistency it would be better to adopt one version throughout, and that John Stradling Thomas is better (this would seem to be how he was referred to in most contemporary reports and works I have seen by other MPs use the full name). However before making changes I thought it best to discuss the issue to see what other editors' views on the matter are. Dunarc (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks I have standardised as John Stradling Thomas for now. Dunarc (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming issue for John Stradling Thomas
Talk:Church of St James and St Paul, Marton

message: I notice that this article has recently been moved from St James' and St Paul's Church, Marton to Church of St James and St Paul, Marton. While the former version is a touch clumsy in this instance, it represents the most common form used for English churches on Wikipedia and I therefore feel that the article should be moved back for consistency. Please comment if you object. Espresso Addict 15:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Done. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Forest School Camps

message: 'though others sprung forth from cultural and ascetic bases, such as Merry Moot, or the Camp Songs.' Is ascetic a typo for aesthetic? There may be, arguably, ascetic bases to some FSC activities but this doesn't seem to be a proper usage of the word.Zaphod11 10:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:International Festival of the Sea, 2005

message: The article contains the following:
:The first International Festival of the Sea took place in Bristol in 1996 with the Royal Navy as primary participants.
I was at the first IFOS and this statement does not correspond with my recollections. I recall Bristol as having a predominantly civil maritime basis. In fact the principal 'naval' vessel I recall was a reproduction US Navy wooden-walled frigate. They may well have been the odd RN minesweeper, maybe even a frigate, but unless my memory serves me very wrong, describing the RN as a primary participant is stretching things too far. Of course subsequent IFOSs have been very different, at least the ones in Portsmouth (I missed the Leith event). I've tagged the above statement, to give other editors a chance to cite something that proves my memory wrong. -- Chris j wood 10:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Navy primary participants at Bristol
Talk:31-bit computing

message: "Perhaps the only computing architecture based on 31-bit addressing is one of computing's most famous and most profitable." Is this perhaps a bit editorial? Should I change it? 9irl (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed this phrase as OR/opinion/editorial. --Nczempin (talk) 07:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Well, it was now removed, and I think it was appropriate that it was removed.  If there's folklore (especially folklore with a fanboyish tone) in other N-bit articles, it should be removed.  If somebody wants to talk about their fun times with some line of computers, they can find somebody to host their blog. Guy Harris (talk) 07:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorialization 

message: Actually, the CPU can work in two different modes, the switch between them can be performed via instructions BASSM (Branch And Save [return address] and Set Mode) and BSM (Branch and Set Mode).
In 24-bit mode, the highest 8 bits of addresses are ignored; every code and data must be in the lowest 16 MiB; instructions BAL and BALR fill the highest byte of the return address with other pieces of information (e.g. the program mask); new instructions BAS and BASR fill the highest byte of the return address with zero.
In 31-bit mode, the highest bit of addresses is ignored, code and data can be anywhere in the 2 GiB address space; instructions BAL, BALR, BAS and BASR set the highest bit of the return address to one, to indicate the new CPU-mode.
Compatibility problems arise when you get an address via BAL/BALR in 24-bit mode, any try to use it later in 31-bit mode: the garbage in the highest byte makes the address invalid.
To create compatible programs, you have to use BAS/BASR instead BAL/BALR; stop using 3-bytes addresses (DC AL3(symbol)), and when use macros having new and old formats, choose the new format.  NevemTeve (talk) 11:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That sort of detail would belong in IBM System/370-XA, not here. Guy Harris (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transition
Talk:RSTS-11

message: Paul, you have at least a decade more experience with this than I do.  You should be writing the history.  I just created my wiki account 2 days ago so this is all new to me.
There was only one (1) place I ever saw the word MiniRSTS on a DIGITAL document.  It was in the packing
slip that explained the distributed software (an RK05 platter with DOS V08-02 and paper tapes).
I have never seen the term in any DIGITAL manual or referenced in any of the software that ran on RSTS-11 (most of which you wrote).  If this is an incorrect term, it should be removed.
Bbump 17:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MiniRSTS 

message: This has come up a few times and everyone agrees it should be done... thought I'd stimulate the idea again.  I could go at it myself, but am not by any means a subject expert (other than using and programming for RSTS many, many years ago).--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Pacific degu

message: There are only images available from dead animals collected for the German Alexander Koenig Museum in Bonn and one can find some black-white photos in the article of Rainer Hutterer (1994) or asking in the museum if one can see the preserved specimen (as a friend of mine did). The collected specimens were snap trapped in 1959 and shipped to Germany but they were forgotten in the basement of the museum until the 1990s and the German mammalogist Rainer Hutterer took the opportunity to describe this new species (btw. the whole story is explained in the work of Hutterer 1994). Later some Chilean scientists (Saavedra et al. 2003) made some efforts to find evidence for living individuals and trapped nearly the whole island but didn't succeed, thus it is suggested that this species is extinct now. Because the animals are trapped more than 60 years before they were described as a new species and since then nobody has ever seen a living individual, it is hard to state any precise detail about how they lived and thus it is highly questionable to state that this species is diurnal. Maybe there is some indication to assume that they are diurnal, but I think this should be stressed, that this is an assumption and not a fact.--DegupediaDE (talk) 13:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No images of Pacific degus available
Talk:Cherrie's pocket gopher

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Cherrie´s Pocket Gopher and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Cherrie´s Pocket Gopher until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 15:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cherrie´s Pocket Gopher" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bisoxazoline ligand

message: Hi all. Some time back I began working on improvements for this article, however my efforts have ballooned and I now basically have a replacement page. I feel it would be rude to post an update that radical without running it past the existing authors. The proposed new page is currently here (link now removed as project finished). Feedback is very welcome. Project Osprey (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Out of interest would that include the work done prior Brunner's? I ask because those ligands are Schiff bases, which are chemically quite different. Project Osprey (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Yes, I do see your point. I suppose what I'm trying to do is avoid 'history' being the largest section of the article. That way it focuses more on the chemistry that is, rather than the chemistry that was. Looking at it objectively however, there's isn't really that much text prior to where my history starts, it's just that the pictures are very big. I think with some careful editing (and some new drawings) I could fold the two histories together. Another possible solution would be to move the early stuff to the current Schiff base article (it needs development anyway). I can then flesh out my description of the work from around Brunner's time with a clear link to that article for those interested in the pre-oxazoline work.Project Osprey (talk) 22:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

text: I'll flesh out the history first and see where that gets me. Once it's done I'll contact you and we can decide how best to proceed(?) With regards to chemical editors, I've found this one to be pretty good. Project Osprey (talk) 01:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did take a look at the next draft (as per your comment in my Talk) and I am happy to see that the basic message from the background/history section has been preserved. Thanks. V8rik (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cheers, I'll do some final checks before changing the page to the new version in the next day or so. Thank you very much for your input. Project Osprey (talk) 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft rebuild
Talk:Wath upon Dearne

message: More information on this would be useful. According to the pref. to Martin's History ""The area to which this history refers is that of the ancient parish of Wath near Rotherham. This included ... the ... parishes of Brampton Bierlow (with West Melton), Wentworth, half of Thorpe Hesley, Hoyland St. Peter, Hoyland St. Andrew, Elsecar, Swinton, and part of Kilnhurst."--Pref.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 01:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parish church and parish 

message: This needs a photo if anyone can come up with the goods.  Either Montgomery Square or up near the church would probably be best. BaseTurnComplete (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a few on the Geograph project here or here that can be used. If you want one of these images and require help then drop me a note on my talk page. Keith D (talk) 12:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  The Market Cross image is particularly nice.BaseTurnComplete (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Wath is in South Yorkshire, not West Yorkshire. I live there, so I know this. It's right in the middle of South Yorkshire, at least half an hour away from West Yorkshire. Can someone correct this please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.6.224.165 (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the article it says it is in South Yorkshire but historically in the West Riding of Yorkshire which is correct as South Yorkshire did not exist before 1974. The article does not mention West Yorkshire. Keith D (talk) 17:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "west" Yorkshire?

message: Is it Wath as in path (short vowel), or woth as in wash? Francis Hannaway (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Woth as in wash, I believe. Oculi (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  And how are you pronouncing Wath? 

message: The figures in the text and in the infobox are very different- is there a reason for using two different figures? --▲RedScrees (talk) 14:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 
Talk:Alcorn's pocket gopher

message: No luck on Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 02:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Hi, the correct name is not Dale Russell, but the zoologist Robert J. Russell See the original publication. --Salixen (talk) 18:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species author 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Alcorn´s Pocket Gopher and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Alcorn´s Pocket Gopher until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 15:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Alcorn´s Pocket Gopher" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1925 University of Oxford Chancellor election

message: I wonder if this should be 925 University of Oxford Chancellor elections, As it stands the article covers what it describes as the first election the unopposed election of Milner (which was voided by his death before he could take office) and the contested election held following Milner's death in which Cave defeated Asquith. I realise it is debatable to what extent these could be described as two distinct elections, but currently the article is labeling them as such, so the plural for the title might be more appropriate. Dunarc (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Apex (diacritic)

message: Should this be merged into acute accent? The acute accent must have derived from the apex... FilipeS 11:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: How widespread was use of the apex?  Is it found in a majority of documents?  A significant minority?  The Jade Knight (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if it's quantified , but there's e.g. "A lectional sign which occurs fairly frequently in the tablets is the apex mark, made as a more or less oblique stroke." http://vindolanda.csad.ox.ac.uk/tablets/TVII-4-4.shtml 2A01:C22:A474:C700:D0CA:9ACD:8DAB:9527 (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the Vindolanda tablets are written in Latin, that doesn't seem particularly surprising? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage? 

message: I did not find the word "Apex" in Unicode character names. Is it encoded in Unicode at all, possibly under another name? Has Unicode published anything about the acute-resemblance? -DePiep (talk) 18:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nearly ten years later and still not there: I suspect that it never will. For a guess I would say that the Consortium would treat it as just an alternative name for the same thing. They had fried a far bigger fish when they said that many Chinese and Japanese ideograms are allographs and don't need unique code points. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Looks like a good idea. All you need now is the get it adopted and documented by Vietnamese language experts and then we can cite it. Wikipedia can't set a standard, only document what exists according to reliable sources.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in Unicode? 

message: Why is it that although double consonants are always marked, marking long vowels has fallen out of use? Did vowels eventually lose their length?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 12:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Diacritics are less conspicuous then full letters, I guess. The vowels did lose their length and, in some cases, change their quality, but this change didn't make it into the prestigious dialect. It was considered proper to spell as closely to the Classical Latin as possible, but the pronunciation diverged significantly, and even if the diacritics hadn't been lost, they likely wouldn't have kept their exact function. 89.64.26.192 (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did vowel length marking stop? 

message: This article makes a lot of claims that amount to "modern experts are stupid and don't know what they're doing". That sort of claim requires a large number of good references. (Actually, even with a large number of good references, I think some of these claims would need to be toned down; but first, references.) —RuakhTALK 16:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references needed.
Talk:Battle of Salaita Hill

message: The infobox says 138 Allied casualties, while the body of the article says 172, 138 being South African. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualty count discrepancy 

message: Smuts took command of the British Forces in East Africa on 12 February. The planning and execution of the Battle of Salaita on 12 February were under General Tighe's command. See Smut's first despatch to the War Office, dated 30 April 1916.https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/29630/supplement/6129 FunkyCanute (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smuts 

message: Salaita Hill, also called Oldorobo, is in Kenya and not in Tanzania. So the map in the article is wrong. --Rakell (talk) 06:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.nation.co.ke/news/Criticos-denies-Salaita-Hill--vows-to-stay-put/1056-4957332-82lgsj/index.html
--Rakell (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salaita Hill in Kenya
Talk:Barcoo fever

message: I have reviewed this article; put subject in bold, put name of journal in italics, corrected one typo. What more needs to be done, please? 58.160.114.209 11:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Could someone please break this article into sections according to the guidelines suggested at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28Medicine-related_articles%29#Diseases.2Fdisorders.2Fsyndromes?  It would be a big improvement for the readers.  (Just leave out any section that you don't have information for.)  WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Could someone please
Talk:Dumoine River

message: The article contains a statement in the ‘Paddling the Dumoine’ section that ‘all rapids and fall have well-maintained portage trail around them.’ The article also cites Hap Wilson’s book that contains descriptions and maps of the Dumoine and other regional rivers. Hap Wilson’s maps of the Dumoine show many rapids classified as I and Itech for which there are no portage trails on the maps, and there is very good reason to believe that no portage trails exist in fact.
The statement in the article should be deleted or qualified since it is inaccurate as it stands. A Class I rapid is still considered a rapid, and persons who paddle it benefit from basic moving water skills. 
The present statement may suggest to persons of limited canoeing experience and no moving water experience that the river can be traveled easily, because all waters that may challenge persons who have no moving water experience can be avoided by portaging.   Such is not the case, and the present article may expose readers who inform themselves no further to unanticipated difficulties or risks. 
TomGetc 11:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Huli, Xiamen

message: created article for missing link on the xiamen wikipage. --Takamaxa 11:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created article
Talk:Citicoline

message: Important topic missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.88.11.188 (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A PubMed search on citicoline and attention deficit did not yield any published literature on attention deficit disorders. A search at clinicaltrials.gov did not yield any ongoing research on this topic, either. Based on my and the 2016 comment, removed any mention of ADHD.David notMD (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADHD 

message: Although funding seems to be the major hurtle in this research project, remyelination could be achieved with CDP-choline (experiments show some benefits).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Rosenberger (talk • contribs) 22:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference following explores the theory of CDP-choline for MS, but there are no published clinical trials on this topic. The search site clinicaltrials.gov does not list any ongoing research in this area either.David notMD (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDP-choline for patients with multiple sclerosis 

message: As of March 2017, this is what is in the article: "Citicoline improves visual function in patients with glaucoma [18] and may improve amblyopia("lazy eye") when combined with eye patch treatment.[19]"  Ref #18 is a review. Ref #19 is a clinical trial. There are no published reviews - the preferred type of reference - for citicoline and amblyopia. The quality of literature is not strong - the cited ref, for example, was not a blinded trial, and some of the trials it cites are quite old. Someone more expert in treatment of amblyopia may decide that it is premature to include citicoline as a treatment.David notMD (talk) 12:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: After asking opinion of more experienced W editor, removed amblyopia mention entirely. The American Academy of Opthamology (2015) refers to this as an emerging treatment concept, with further studies needed.David notMD (talk) 12:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vision literature 

message: Removed mention of citicoline for appetite satiety and improving blood flow, as the references were to one uncontrolled human trial and animal work, respectively. Removed mention of amblyopia because only a few clinical trials, some weak or old, and no good review. Replaced references for glaucoma, memory and stroke with secondary sources (reviews, systemic reviews, meta-analyses).David notMD (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical uses - removals and reference upgrades 

message: I hesitate to edit this article because I have no background in this area, but I just noticed something that seems obviously wrong.  The article states, "Studies have failed to confirm any potential benefits of citicoline for cognitive impairment," and then it goes on to cite an article that seems to me to state the exact opposite.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hirschjoshua (talk • contribs) 20:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. This article used for reference here expresses completely opposite results 109.78.161.125 (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memory and Cognition
Talk:Fuzzy subalgebra

message: TeXify please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.78.72 (talk) 23:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some. If more is needed, consult the source of List of mathematical symbols. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 14:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TeX
Talk:Jim Protector

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --41.109.186.152 (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --41.109.186.152 (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion