lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fornicate gyrus

message: "The Fornicate Gyrus is connected to the amydala, the mid region of the parietal region of the skull. The Fornicate Gyrus releases a chemical that allows sexual stimulation usually in the mid 20's in females and 30's in males. It is possibly part of the Limbic system."
This article makes little sense to me.
Could the initial author add a reference for his information? What is the chemical? Can't people be sexually stimulated before their 20's and 30's? Therefore what is the function of the chemical?
--Henry Hadlow 15:03, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The
Talk:Booyah (stew)

message: According to a couple of sources, a Polish soup called Bouja is commonly made in Minnesota and served at church fundraisers. Probably this is the real derivation of "booya," a phonetic spelling. The other history would appear to be false.
See http://www.hub-uk.com/family/family0041.htm
Also http://www.recipezaar.com/82625
Drollison 00:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booya = Bouja? 

message: It is written very messily, and someone should probably give it a cleanup banner.  I can't do much because I don't have an account and I don't know much about the subject.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.153.167 (talk) 21:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The booyah page needs cleanup. 

message: I live in Saint Paul and often see signs in late summer through fall advertising a booya. Some are sponsored by churches, but many appear to be community celebrations. If there is a connection to ethnic Poles, it is well-concealed. Booya refers both to the soup and the event. I do not know anything about how the soup is prepared.
Cburkitt (talk) 21:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not seen as "bouja" anywhere because the article has it right, in that it's a derivation from French, and is in fact French in origin. Minnecologiest,c 00:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, regional: Booya is a thick stew of unknown origin occurring throughout the Upper Midwest region of the United States. I intended to start cleaning it up a month ago but it got sidelined. Thanks for the reminder. Minnecologiest,c 14:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usually spelled "booya" in western Minnesota 

message: For what it's worth, I was born and raised in northeastern Wisconsin near Green Bay, and no place would ever spell it "booya".  Always with an "h" at the end in our area of the state.  In fact, never having gone to a church picnic type event outside of Wisconsin, I have never seen it without the "h" until reading this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.37.185 (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Usually spelled "booyah" in northeastern Wisconsin
Talk:Tetra Master

message: I delisted this article from the GA list because it fails to state its references, a requirement for GA status. The combos section is rather weak and short, being only a sentence, and the description of a phase sounds rather like a how-to, against WP:NOT.AndyZ 20:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since a reference has been added, the main argument now against listing this as a GA are:
*The article still sounds like a how-to w/o stating that directly; especially the gameplay section describes the individual steps throughout the gameplay while constantly giving examples.
*A weak and short combos section. Can more be added about a combo? Plus, the combo section appears twice.
*A lot of lists, some of which should be converted into prose.
*Some of the sections in general are lacking, but since this is only a mini-game, I guess it is acceptable.
AndyZ 15:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA

message: Tried to tidy this up a bit and add more information, hope it helps get it back on the track to GA. Wa 07:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning..
Talk:Triple Triad

message: Can I ask why someone keeps removing links to active sites from external links? Lady Brise 06:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: External links are mean to be used sparingly for things directly linked to the article. Resource links, community links, fan links and so on are discouraged. Chris Cunningham 09:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you feel they're relevant then add them back with justification and remove the less relevant ones. There's a full edit history, so don't be shy in removing things from articles. The important thing is that the extlinks section doesn't get treated like advertising space, which means keeping it short and as relevant as possible. Chris Cunningham 11:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is so much better now, the list is both cropped and concise. Thank you. Lady Brise 13:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There are special rules in the game, are there not? For example, Same (A challenging card with equal sides as two or more resting cards flips both of them) or Plus (If the sum of where the challenging card and the resting card are the same as the sum of another side on a resting card, then they both get flipped)? These rules are not included in the article, as well as the rest of them.--҈Đǣţĥ ɱøťőŕ ☎Image:IconOfTeh1337Godz.JPG 02:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Rules
Talk:Alastair Campbell

message: Since November 2017, there's been an  tag in the External links section of this article, so I reviewed the external links in that section just now and I removed two links. I'm putting them here if anyone else wants to review them, or re-add them if they believe it is appropriate:
*Campbell defiant over Lions role article at BBC News, 20 July 2005
*
 Seagull123  Φ  16:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: To 2A02:C7C:3638:FF00:809A:248E:D940:BD40 (talk) 12:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please help. I tried to ‘Add topic’ but it will not work 

message: Can someone who knows Campbell's career well please overhaul this mess? The headings make no sense, the structure is all over the place, there is loads of repetition and not enough citation. It looks like it has never had any tlc or, at least, not for many years. Even the talk page is a mess - has nobody been watching? Anna (talk) 12:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but why have you deleted literally everything in the talk page? Ellwat (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing has been deleted. It's all been archived? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, my mistake, you're right. Ellwat (talk) 14:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: All those External links checks could have been deleted! Might make the Archive easier to navigate? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Martin, I have now removed the botchecks from the archived talk page as requested. Anna (talk) 15:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Many thanks, Anna. And I'd say if it had been just me visiting, then probably not. But someone like the Pope might just make it? (especially if the St Peter's taxi was parked up on double yellows...)  Martinevans123 (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I this about the Gambian school children? (# confused).  Anna (talk) 15:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, just ignore me. I agree with your trimming. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess
Talk:Thanatopsis

message: I don't think "All Acacians" qualifies as a valid source. Even a page on their website that says that their motto comes from this poem would be fine. Jfmantis (talk) 06:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real source needed for Acacian's motto 

message: Much of the "Background" section does not provide background for this particular poem. The link to the biographical article on Bryant should cover much of what is in the first paragraph. I recommend striking it entirely and allowing that second paragraph to stand on its own. --Midnightdreary (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Myeongjong of Joseon

message: First, I know nothing of Korean history - BUT this aritlce would appear to refer to events during the Seven-Year War so the admiral referenced would appear to be Yi Sun-sin which would make Myeongjong of Joseon an alternate name/tile for King Seonjo? This all needs taking in hand by someone with a proper knowledge of Korean history - and the transliteration of Korean names into the Roman alphabet.
Unfortunately the current level of description in this article would appear to be a Korean equivalent to the British history of 1066 and All That.
--Cje 16:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just browsed this article and realized that it is containing an error. Would you please correct it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.247.35.145 (talk) 11:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displaying issue in this article 

message: Hello @NXcrypto, I saw you reverted my recent edit. I don't believe the content that I deleted aligns with Wikipedia standards. As per my edit comment, they were "Unsourced details not about the primary subject of the article that appear like refs but aren't". See WP:INDISCRIMINATE; I think policy backs me up on this edit.
For a similar conversation I had with another user, please see the first post on User talk:104.232.119.107#April 2024. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also you didn't leave an edit comment, could you explain the reversion? 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You cleary removed the sources.  NXcrypto (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read what's inside the references in the page you just linked. Do any of those contain sources, or are they miscellaneous claims about people? 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry. Thank you . Appreciating your work. Reverting back. Keep it up. NXcrypto (talk) 05:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, thank you for discussing this with me. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref removal
Talk:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

message: I am unable to understand the difference in scope between this article and North-West Frontier Province (1901–2010). Can somebody explain? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope confusion 

message: Newspaper is not a reliable source.Jawadmdr (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Dawn news

message: The infobox says that Pashto is the "official and national" language, but this is obviously not true, the national language of Pakistan is Urdu, and I am pretty sure Urdu is official in KP as well. 65.101.48.103 (talk) 16:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pashto the national language? 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 00:45, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa]] for deletion 

message: Hi, I see that you removed the languages pie chart. While I agree the census/data has problems, for instance not representing local languages, I wouldn't call it misleading? It, at the very least, gives an idea of the situation of languages in KPK. For instance, one could probably assume that 6% of the population, a significant minority, speak a language other than the ones listed? As for the data being outdated, ie. pre-FATA merge, can a simple note not suffice? :>> Taimoor Ahmed(Send a Message?) 15:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's bad practice to have the charts include tiny immigrant languages but exclude major local ones. This wasn't misleading for you because you know how the census counts the languages, and you're aware that Sindhi or Brahui for example are not native to the province. Most readers won't have that knowledge.  If a pie chart absolutely must be present, then the right way to do is to cut off the list after the smallest language counted by the census that's bigger than the biggest one that's not counted, and combine all the rest into "others". That's what has been done in the article text: percentages are given only for Pashto, Hindko and Saraiki (and these already include the combined figures for KPK + FATA). – Uanfala (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language Pie Chart 

message: Yes
I am ok 119.159.251.36 (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trays 

message: dharhara 37.210.242.182 (talk) 13:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asali Kamal darhara
Talk:To-do list

message: Someone should really expand this article. --68.72.125.65 16:30, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have placed this artcle up for deletion, and you may choose to participate in the vote. The reason for it's deletion is that the article is useless, and moreover common knowledge, and not fit for an encylopedia. TDS  (talk • contribs)  18:41, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopedias are supposed to be repositories of all knowledge, including common knowledge.  That's what makes them encyclopedic.  They cater to everyone, even beginners who don't know this stuff.  Go for it! 22:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up for Deletion 

message: The article Task list had a better opening description, and the term has a slightly broader meaning which encompasses the context of "to-do list", so I merged this article with that one, and then expanded it.  The result is a much nicer article on this topic.  Go for it! 23:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged and expanded into [[Task list]]
Talk:Moody Awori

message: I removed the following from the article because I couldn't find on-line sources to back them up:
"Defended the perpetrators of Anglo Leasing (also known as Anglo Fleecing). Widely thought to have been paid off by the kamani family to the tune of US$1M."
Best I could do was the newspaper (Kenyan Sunday Standard) link I've included. If anyone can provide sources? (4.42 etc was me - thought I was logged on)
--Cje 17:26, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CSN (album)

message: I removed the link to Robert Christgau's review, because it really doesn't contain any useful information about CSN, the album. He just writes "Wait a second--wasn't this a quartet? D+". I think that a review linked by an encyclopedia should have more descriptive information, instead of just panning an album because it's made by only three out of the four people you want it to be made by. Gary (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  ^ Agreed.  Someone put it back but am removing it.  If someone wants a critical reception section so bad it needs to include a legit review.  It is biased by default, with the first sentence describing the reviewer's distaste for the musicians.  A music review needs to be about the music, no the absense of Neil Young. UselessToRemain (talk) 17:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  ^ Disagreed. Wikipedia is not a repository of links for information (funny no mention of the fabricated "not rated" by Rolling Stone was made), and the ratings template is meant to supplement a section of prose by illustrating through the presentation of scores. Also, your opinions on the critic are moot; he's prominent and well-respected enough in the field of music journalism and reviewing to qualify WP:SUBJECTIVE. Get over it. Dan56 (talk) 08:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing link to Robert Christgau 

message: Most of this article is written as though it's been copied/pasted from another source. It's not exactly encyclopaedic. Some of it sounds like it's copied from some sort of documentary? I don't know. Just a thought. Edaemus (talk) 22:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting?  

message: Sorry to spoil everyone's illusions, but Graham Nash's song "Cathedral" is certainly not a "critique on Christianity" - it is in fact literally a song about an LSD trip that Nash once took while visiting Winchester cathedral!  Graham Nash has stated this fact himself on several occasions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by StanPomeray (talk • contribs) 07:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cathedral 

message: Several references have been added to copyvio material by  -- scans of Billboard magazines not published by Billboard themselves. Are acceptable references available for this material, or should it be removed completely? -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio Refrences
Talk:Daylight Again

message: Does anyone know which article this link should point to - Jay Ferguson (Canadian musician) or Jay Ferguson (American musician)? -- Chuq (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jay Ferguson
Talk:Resocialization

message: Should be. --Riverofdreams 17:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary 

message: "Resocialization into a total institution involves a complete change of personality"
:This sentence counts as original research since it hasn't cited any sources and is debatable conjecture, so I removed it. I think much of this article comes under that category as it needs the support of complete references (i.e. including title, author, publisher, date) and perhaps more balance. Could someone, or the original author, please add these? Thanks -- Info 151 07:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, the inline reference to Sproule needs the date of publication to be added, and the inline references to both Sproule and Reihm also need to be supported by full reference at the end of the text, as per the general rules of author-date referencing. -- Info 151 07:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview: Original Research
Template talk:Infobox British Railway Station

message: *Name - the name of the station
*GridReference - Grid Reference of the station
*City - City or town the station is in. If its a rural station use N/A
*Operator - The operator of the station (Usually the main train operator)
*Type - The type of railway e.g. Standard, Underground, Preserved etc.
*Facilities - Brief description of what's available at the station. Ticket Office, Shops etc.
*PlatformNo - The number of platforms
*Opened - The date the station opened
*Closed - The date the station was closed (N/A for active stations)
*Reopend - The date the station was re-opened
josh 17:42, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I've changed this page to redirect to Template:UK stations, which has become the de facto standard infobox, containing pretty much the same information.  This infobox was only used once anyway.  --RFBailey 15:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Sean Yseult

message: does she play?
It looks like a Vox Phantom IV...the same kind played by Michael Jay in The Fuzztones and Phil "Fang" Volk in Paul Revere and The Raiders.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.188.17 (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: what kind of bass?

message: Why is there nothing here about her surfer rock bar band "Famous Monsters"?  They had an album and a compilation of their singles and EPs called In the Night! and Around the World in 80 Bikinis.  Am I just horribly mistake?  Is there a different Sean Yseult who was in this band?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.248.160.82 (talk) 16:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  famous monsters 
Talk:United States national football team

message: I've made this page a disambiguous, as while the prevailing world usage world refer to the soccer team, in the United States, users would be look for the American football team. Dlong 18:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you even looked at the discussion page for United States men's national soccer team? Or the "what links here" page, for which almost every article is discussing the men's soccer team? 90.198.51.135 20:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I am pretty dubious about this disambiguation page.  Although American football is far more popular than association football in the US, the national soccer team is far, far more popular than the national american football team, which I've never even heard of before.  Also, why does the American men's team need to specify that it is the men's team, when every other men's national team in the world is at "Country national football team"? john k (talk) 01:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.S. fooball team. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 19:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "U.S. fooball team" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nuno Gomes

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a B but a C because misses sources. Sdrtirs (talk) 11:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We can't know he is Soares Pereira e Ribeiro or Soares e Pereira Ribeiro Matthew_hk tc 05:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: Don't have you better image??Amir (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image