Talk:Mastopexy

message: This article reads too much like a commercial.  Should have some references to why women would want to do this, things about body image etc. It reads like it was lifted (hah hah) out of a plastic surgeon's brochure
12.159.138.194 (talk) 18:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have seen cosmetic surgeons create online pages about the use of wound healing chemicals as part of cosmetic surgery.  That could be described as well as referenced at the article
some pubmed references are curcurmin doubles rate of healing http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660044 ,  ginger extract doubles rate of healing http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660044 , chitosan alginate gel doubles rate of healing http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918372.  doubled rate of healing is my description of the data from figures as well as full text. Some of these papers have also have images of tissue quality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treonsverdery (talk • contribs) 17:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of wound healing pharmaceuticals as well as their professional use 

message: Hi, Fyrael:
I have reverted your deletion of required medical information, because it truncates the full information the reader requires; look up Wikipedia:The perfect article, bullet number four.
Please write to me, and discuss why you have deleted relevant medical information about a surgical procedure. Are you a physician?
What do you mean: We don't need it? Please reply and explain.
Otto Placik (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been addressed in the talk section above.--Taylornate (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of factual material supporting the surgery article. 

message: I put this one in the surgical anatomy section, which already has some discussion above.  The same exact section has been deleted and restored at least twice, on multiple articles.--Taylornate (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Your tags do not speak for themselves, you must speak for yourself. Surely, as a 4-th year med student, you can identify where in the Mastopexy article are the errors. Identify them, show your good faith as a Wikipedia Medical Editor. 
Otto Placik (talk) 11:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of pasting an identical message here, why don't you pick up the discussion where you left it over four months ago?--Taylornate (talk) 17:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Breast.svg Nominated for Deletion

message: This article uses the term 'correction' a lot, sometimes in the context of a purely aesthetic decision. I would propose changing this to somethings like 'change', 'modification', or something more neutral. The implication that breasts that sag are 'incorrect' seems a little odd.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.94.191 (talk) 17:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--Taylornate (talk) 18:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you don't mind, I'll be changing this as I think it's an important thing to be addressed. And it doesn't seem to have been done already. Malik.albahlani (talk) 06:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction?

message: The text lists 7 components — but the diagram to the right shows 8!
Rib cage and chest wall (no. 1 in text and diagram) seem to align, though it would be better if the terminology was consistent.
The astute reader may be able to work out that Chest muscles and pectoralis muscles (no. 2 in text and diagram) also correspond, because the text mentions the pectoralis major and minor muscles; however, the text also mentions the intercostal muscles, which are not identified in the diagram.
Pectoralis fascia (no. 3 in the text) has no corresponding identification in the diagram.
Suspensory ligaments (no. 4 in the text) has no corresponding identification in the diagram. These are further identified in the text as Cooper's ligaments - but in the article on Ptosis Dr. Christine Haycock (a surgeon at the New Jersey Medical School and an expert in sports medicine) is quoted as saying that "Cooper's ligaments have nothing to do with supporting breast tissue ... they just serve to divide the breast into compartments." 
The astute reader can associate Glandular tissue (no. 5 in the text) with Lobules (no. 3 in the diagram) because the text mentions lobules.
Similarly, the astute reader may know that 'adipose' means 'fatty', and can therefore associate Adipose tissue (no. 6 in the text) with Fatty tissue (no. 7 in the diagram); also, the text mentions fatty acids.
Skin envelope is the only item that is common in terminology in text (no. 7) and diagram (no. 8)!
Nos. 4, 5 and 6 in the diagram are not listed in the text, though Glandular tissue (no. 5 in the text) mentions 'lactiferous ducts (milk passages)'; the astute reader may be able to infer that these correspond with 'Milk duct' (no. 6 in the diagram).
Is it possible to adjust the diagram to suit the text, or vice versa?
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 12:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanical structures of the breast 

message: In a bit I will be changing the language in this article to a gender-neutral one. This page explains why it is important for sex-specific articles to use gender-neutral language (similar edits will be made on articles of this nature). Malik.albahlani (talk) 07:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender-neutral language