lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alfisol

message: According to 'Environmental Science for Environmental Management' (Timothy O'Riordan, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall 2000), alfisols are named 'luvisols' in FAO.
:Correct, although exceptions prevent alfisols being truly synonymous with luvisols.   Some aridisols classify as luvisols. Some vertic alfisols classify as FAO vertisols, lithic alfisols classify as FAO lithisols, etc. Paleorthid 20:06, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page on Alfisols lists them as both the oldest and the youngest forest soil order. 
WTF?
LostbodyM 07:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That unreferenced statement conflicts with referenced content at Paleopedological_record#Records_of_the_various_soil_groups -- Paleorthid 20:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait... what? 
Talk:Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia

message: *Nationalism - the rationale of the ASALA's existence
*Separatism - a prerequisite for self determination of a national minority
*Self determination - national autonomy 
*Sovereignty - the result of self determination and the goal of the ASALA
*Diaspora -  An internal link would contextualize Armenian nationalism within circumstances of political and social dispersal.
DJ Silverfish 20:24, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for "See Also" 

message: I suggest you consult the archives or comment here rather than continuing to edit war (t · c) buidhe 17:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Buidhe I suggest you consult the archives or comment here rather than continuing to edit war. Mkltkn (talk) 12:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Terrorism" in first sentence 

message: The article has a picture of the memorial. But it doesn't talk about it or provide references.
Also, the article says that the initial attacks led to wider knowledge of the genocide, but it doesn't provide a relevant reference for it. I wouldve expected a source like a survey of countries' attitudes after the attacks. Hovsepig (talk) 06:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorial and genocide recognition
Talk:Girl in Gold Boots

message: I haven't seen the MST3k version, but there was some weird cut in my DVD version, that I noticed when I watched it. Not in a diner scene though, as far as I remember. (Entheta 00:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I took quite a few notes on the non-MST3K DVD I watched. If you could be more specific about what scene you're referring to, Entheta, I may have more information about it. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't rewatched the entire movie, and I don't know where the "teleportation scene" is, but the thing I found weird is about 23 minutes into the DVD. They're in a diner, they leave, then they're at a beach together with a fourth guy who as far as i can remember is never introduced. (Entheta 19:09, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry about the delay in responding, Entheta. I must have been distracted for a few days until your updated posting fell off my watchlist. The "teleportation" scene (around 28 minutes into the MST3K episode) is in the diner. The Geneni Film print doesn't have the film skip that makes Buz look like he teleports into the booth. Both the MST3K and GF prints proceed onto a buggy joyride on the beach. (In between, the GF print has an odd 7-second partial scene where Buz checks out Critter's bike, that didn't make it into the MST3K version.) I'd bet you're thinking of the buggy owner. Although GF's print has about 17 seconds more of the buggy ride (preceding the MST3K portion), it doesn't reveal anything more about who this guy is or how the travellers ran into him. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry to enter the topic 4 years late, but the "odd 7-second partial scene where Buz checks out Critter's bike", is definitely IN the mst3k version. Crow even puts in a riff about a "kitchen blender" (?). If one were to- just hypothetically- cut the movie into ten parts and post it on a website, the scene would be about 2min 36seconds into part 4.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 23:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird cut in DVD
Wikipedia talk:Table: namespace and editor

message: A broader solution to the same problem is m:Wikidata, which I am presently implementing. It will include the ability to add arbitrary structured data to wiki pages and edit it using a forms based editing approach. I therefore recommend holding off on implementing a table-extraction based solution.--Eloquence* 08:55, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
: How is Wikidata coming along?  (SEWilco 17:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structured data in MediaWiki 

message: Maybe a GPL'ed Javascript interface would help, for the people willing to use it. (SEWilco 02:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPL JS spreadsheet 

message: Is a Javascript table editor still needed?  Should it be incopreated into WikEd?  —Dispenser 06:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still needed?
Talk:Potassium tetraiodomercurate(II)

message: Does someone know how to fix the structure diagram so that it actually has potassium in it, instead of only showing the anion? 70.49.105.215 (talk) 13:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , I would have thought you would notice that the structure of HgI42- was incorrect instead of complaining about the potassium.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Human nature: people like to detect traces of lots of stuff out of curiosity or by pressure of regulations. See analytical chemistry.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

text: mol · l-1 (with a small "L") is correct, M and N is obsolete. 80.136.237.146 23:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Conspiracy theories claiming involvement by Zionists or Jews in the September 11, 2001 attacks/Archive 1

message: Pedant, can you clarify the claim that there is a possible copyvio from http://www.nocturne.org/~terry/wtc_4000_Israeli.html ? And for that matter, point out the duplications you allude to? - Mustafaa 18:19, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as the author of http://www.nocturne.org/~terry/wtc_4000_Israeli.html , I certainly have no objection to material being used from that page, though as I recall it seems the material here was arrived at independently.  Anyway, I've added a public domain notice to the bottom of that page, hopefully that resolves any issues.  Terry 20:27, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyvio

message: I saw on the news not to long after 9/11 that most people in middle eastern nations believed israel, not Osama, was behind 9/11. Some statistic on that would be good, I wonder if it has changed? I'll look into it. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 14:01, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion polls
Talk:Kitchen (novel)

message: — Assignment last updated by Dslaym (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

message: Kitchen is a wonderful book. The way she writes and expresses everything is just so good. She is a wonderful writer i would read more of her books.
I feel it is misleading to describe Mikage as "falling in love." She doesn't really fall in love, as she herself states at several times; she just has a very close relationship with Yuuichi. I'm going to change that. Brutannica 06:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a reason this page has both a 'Plot' section, and 'Book Summary'? 129.215.249.227 (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Aside from "because two different editors each wrote a summary"? No, I don't think so. -- asilvering (talk) 05:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot vs Book Summary
Talk:John Muth

message: It appears that chunks of the article are nearly directly copied from Chapter 1 (and perhaps more) of "Rational Expectations (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature)" by Steven Sheffrin. The section on Holt et. al. (1960), for example, appears in the first pages of Ch 1: http://www.amazon.com/Rational-Expectations-Cambridge-Economic-Literature/dp/0521474000 [click "look inside" if that doesn't automatically appear].  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.252.49.201 (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Un-cited usage?

message: The legacy part says:
It has hard to point to one substantial area of economic research which has not changed as a result of the publication of Muth's works at GSIA. Almost paradoxically, the only viable alternative to Muth's hypothesis is the research agenda put forward by Herb Simon and his concept of "bounded rationality".
The article doesn't describe the relevance of rational expectations to game theory.  Is there any connection?
If not, the first sentence seems unjustified, given the huge impact of game theory on many branches of economics, including say, Industrial Organization.  (I can't see how expectations play any role Harsanyi's Bayesian games, which is the usual way of modeling beliefs and uncertainty in game theory.)
Secondly, why would bounded rationality be a relevant (let alone the only viable) alternative?  Wouldn't the obvious first step be to introduce more moments (e.g. variance)?
--Clausen 15:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy? 

message: Wow!  Quite the POV-push in this article! “the only viable alternative to Muth's hypothesis is the research agenda put forward by Herb Simon and his concept of ‘bounded rationality’”?  Hardly. —SlamDiego←T 04:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyper-POVy 

message: There are two articles dated 1960 using the name John F. Muth, yet in this Wikipedia article the major works include only one dated that year.
It should also be noted that Franco Modigliani has claimed that REH is based on his and Emile Grunberg's work, which is not true since the idea is clearly and already in Oskar Morgenstern's "Vollkommene Voraussicht und wirtschaftliches Gleichewicht" where he shows the idea of economic-model-consistent expectations, which is based on an idea old thousands of years. It shows also that Perfect Foresight is not a Lucas invention despite the commonly held belief.
The name John F. Muth is at the same time a wordplay and it is interesting that there are no photos available of him, just a drawn picture and links to libertarian think tanks. The "htum" can be found in the German word "Reichtum" which corresponds Frank H. Knight's claim that the word liberty meant previously wealth. Ayn Rand's (Alisa Rosenbaum's) book Atlas Shrugged includes a line telling that the pieces connected to nothing.
The Nobel memorial prize receivers have no John F. Muth among them, despite Herbert A. Simon's recommendation that "Jack" Muth should get it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noise Superimposed (talk • contribs) 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing 1960 article and the origins of rational expectations
Talk:Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (consul 32 BC)

message: I don't see why this Gn. Domitius Ahenobarbus gets Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus while his grandson gets Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (1st century).  I'd like to move this one to Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (1st century BC) (and possibly move the other to Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (1st century AD)) and turn this article into a disambiguation page.  If no one objects I'll do so in 48 hours.Binabik80 16:47, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Sutcliffe

message: The Stockwell Strangler article on Wikipedia says that he (Kenneth Erskine) saved Peter Sutcliffe from a Broadmoor attempted murder attempt. If the source is accurate it should be in both articles, but if not true then it should be in neither article of course. Certainly it being in one article but not the other isn't right whatever truth is decided about it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Erskine#Incarceration  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.210.174 (talk) 20:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be reciprocation with The Stockwell Strangler article 

message: User:Wiki2725154 your recent edit here is your only edit to Wikipedia so far. Have you read the discussion here from two years ago? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reprise, April 2022 

message: Should the years active not be before 1975 because he committed murder as well as other attacks that he was or is the prime suspect in but never been charged before 1975. In February 2022 Yorkshire Ripper: The Secret Murders program talk about before the 13 murders he was convicted of and in 2022’s The Ripper Speaks: the Lost Tapes he talks about other crimes including murder before 1975.  https://www.channel5.com/show/the-ripper-speaks-the-lost-tapes  https://www.itv.com/hub/yorkshire-ripper-the-secret-murders/10a0680a0001  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dazza20006 (talk • contribs) 09:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years Active
Talk:Realized niche width

message: I have cleaned up this page and provided as accurate information as I can, but I am not an ecologist and the phrase "realized niche width" does not come up often outside of journals that are not free to access. Does anyone with a more in-depth knowledge of the field have an opinion on this? is niche width more similar to realized niche width than I indicated? It seems that the two terms are often used interchangably, whether correctly or not.Glitch010101 18:56, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Crystalm2392 (talk) 02:17, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BioEE1610 Writing in the Majors
Talk:Miranda warning

message: Changed a mention of "Sixth Amendment right to counsel" to "the right to counsel"; Miranda is sounded entirely the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, including the right to have counsel present; the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, on the other hand, essentially applies only to in-court proceedings  — Preceding unsigned comment added by UberMitch (talk • contribs) 00:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sixth Amendment
Wikipedia talk:WikiNode

message: Hi! www.mrgrape.webs.com
First of all google: wikinode please.
Imagine the wiki-node the back cover of a book. It's part of the book like the front cover is.
Or imagine it like the piece of a corridor in front of somebody's entrance door. You see it, you see the name on the door, the bell to ring on and it's just one more step to enter. But you also see the neighbors' entrance doors. 
* community-wiki: lightning talk on CCC-congress.
The wiki-node is both: It is a part of wikipedia and it is a part of a graph structure of wiki-nodes. It is supposed to get changed by people but these people are supposed to take a look at other wiki-nodes and try to understand before aligning the wiki-node to their local wiki's standards. 
News: We think about triggering recent near changes with a ranking of neighbors on the wiki-node.
* s23-wiki: recent changes of our neighbors please.
Please help to make the meta-"neural"-wiki-node-net grow. Thanks.
We'll talk about it on ting10.
In a wide sense also meta: multilingual communication is related.
MattisManzel 10:32, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  en.wikipedia: wiki-node/talk 

message: This page seems to be outdated - for example, it refers to "brilliant prose". Should it be updated or tagged as historical? Andjam 19:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the WikiNode is a good idea, it's just that nobody seems to care... - furrykef (Talk at me) 19:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated? 

message: Shouldn't the WikiNode be linked from "Other areas of Wikipedia" on the Main Page and from the sidebar on every page? 24.68.146.148 (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Talk:Republic of Artsakh

message: "Armenian refugees during the ethnic cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh" This statement under the 2023 exodus photo is not only untrue but also conflicts with the article belonging to the photo. The article claims the exodus was because of the "fear of ethnic cleansing" and not because of "ethnic cleansing". Ethnic cleansing never happened. Even the Armenian side never claimed there was any ethnic cleansing. Not even a threat of ethnic cleansing could be substantiated. Olmaz (talk) 08:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. CMD (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was clear what you wanted to change, and a simple reverse image source found secondary sources republishing the original primary image with an accurate caption. I have also modified the Commons photo description to reflect this. SamuelRiv (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 March 2024 

message: Quote: The predominantly Armenian-populated region of Nagorno-Karabakh was claimed by both the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic and the First Republic of Armenia when both countries became independent in 1918 after the fall of the Russian Empire. 
Note: the period related to the quote obtains the 1918-1920 timeline. 
Questions: Did the Nagorno-Karabakh region exist as an entity during the 1918-1920 period? 
If yes, can anyone provide any reference to a region of "Nagorno-Karabakh" related to that period? 
Can anyone provide the exact borders of the region (if it existed and was named "Nagorno-Karabakh")? 
if the region of Nagorno-Karabakh did not officially exist during that period, how can one discuss whether it was predominantly populated by any of the ethnic groups? Hew Folly (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Region" is a generic and vague geographical term, and by its use often points to an area not being a geopolitical entity. If you are looking for a geopolitical entity, the Karabakh Council article covers that period, although the article's sourcing is poor. CMD (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. The map of the " 1918-1920 Karabakh Council" is not only unsourced but also falsified. You can check my explanation.Talk:Karabakh Council#A strange 1918-1920 map with a town that did not exist back then Hew Folly (talk) 21:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nagorno-Karabakh: did it exist as a region during the 1918-1920 period
Template talk:WikiProjectCSBTasks/Archive1

message: Poccil,
Thanks  for fixing the table. I was getting seriously confused ChrisG 04:09, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: I've taken an axe to the template.  I don't really see a point to a huge template meant to improve multiple articles that seems to be more intimidating than anything else, imo.  It would be a better strategy to get some momentum and gradually try to expand responsibilities to see at what level people start getting turned off.  The template as I edited it now states: who we are, help the collaboration, choose the next collaboration, and check out the open tasks, which seems like plenty.  If anything, it should be simplified further.  - BanyanTree 22:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: looks good, though would prefer it if one of the targeted countries was on it. - XED.talk 00:22, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  simplification of template
Talk:Radio in the United States

message: This seems to be modified from a work of the US government. Since the original work was created by the US government it was in the public domain, so we can use it under the GFDL in wikipedia. Thue | talk 19:57, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Work of the US government

message: The article's lede gives a brief mention of commercial radio, and then veers off into a not very accurate overview of public radio. (For example, it defines public radio as government subsidized when this is also true of community radio.) Then up pops short-wave radio, followed at last by history of U.S. radio that at best is sketchy and pretty much made up. All in one paragraph!
 
Fixing this shouldn't be that difficult, given the vast amount of fairly solid material that follows. Allreet (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I take back last statement, the part about solid material. Lots of WP:OR here and much of it wrong. One sign this true is the dearth of citations. For sure, article merits an improve template. Allreet (talk) 03:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: leads do not need citations, and they typically jump from topic to topic in order to summarize the articvle. Most paragraphs are well supported by cites, usually to scholarly books and articles.  Rjensen (talk) 04:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede is inaccurate and incoherent 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Richard Genovese

message: Classicjupiter2's arguments for deletion contain a bunch of absolutely absurd implications.  No support for assertion that it is vanity, willful misunderstanding to the effect that print magazine articles would contain full text on MOMA website, implication that selling your books makes an article about you an advert.  Since attempts to establish non-notability of subject look a little shaky given print citations, why not confine ourselves to online sources, so the subject can appear to be more non-notable!  Classicjupiter2 has not explained this Googlecentric outlook, the only reason for which appears to be that it produces results more to his liking.  --Daniel C. Boyer 20:59, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:High-protein diet

message: — Assignment last updated by Lvogel1 (talk) 01:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Online Communities

message: This edit is WP:OR . This Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association from 2021 is on Cardiovascular Health . The paper is not an update of their 2001 recommendations nor mentions high-protein diets. The 2001 paper was on Dietary Protein and Weight Reduction  which mentions high-protein diets. The line "instead of discouraging high-protein diets" is not only original research it is not true. These are two Scientific Statements on separate subjects, the 2021 paper does not even mention or refer to the 2001 paper. Let's keep to what the sources actually say. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research
Talk:United States Flag Code

message: The article opener states that the Code “does not prescribe any penalties for failure to follow the guidelines”, but in fact section §3 of the Code prescribes that a violator of this section “shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $100 or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both, in the discretion of the court.” 2600:1008:B13B:3891:3D78:1CD5:7956:9A14 (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading info 

message: There was a situation comparatively recently (say, 21st century) at which many countries were present and dipped their flags to honor someone who had died recently. I don't remember the circumstances but it would provide a more recent example of not dipping the flag. It might have been at the beginning of Olympic Games or a similar event I had seen on television. I recall the person who had died was noted worldwide. My first thought was Pope John Paul II but I can't find anything.
Any ideas? Humpster (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dipping the flag...or not