lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lorelei (Mutate)

message: I think someone has added mainstream Marvel information to the Ultimate Marvel section of this article, but am not entirely certain. Can someone with access to the Ultimate comic books double check? --Khajidha (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate version
Talk:List of Over the Hedge characters

message: Cleaned up the language of some of the descriptions, which sounded more like an advertisement (ie. addressing the reader as "you"). JAF1970 17:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article needs more of an out-of-universe perspective; a good introduction, maybe some type of sourced overview section about the development of the characters or something to that effect would be wonderful for this article. Right now it looks like it's itching for a deleting.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 02:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-universe
Talk:List of Ben 10 characters

message: Sure we got the characters under one page for now, but in the event that the upcoming Ben 10: Evolution has any recurring villains there, we might have to disperse the sections again with the principal characters getting their own pages. I know we used to have a page on the Omnitrix. In the meantime, we should perfect some info on the character page. Rtkat3 (talk) 3:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Character Page Makeover

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Ben Tennyson (article). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 9#Ben Tennyson (article) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ben Tennyson (article)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: hey guys just wanted to say I added Aggregor to the Villains section because for some reason he was absent. I don't know how to properly fix the table so sorry for the mess Justin Spinach (talk) 04:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Aggregor 

message: Hey, there, I would like all of the characters to be present, including Feedback and all the other that used to be on there, but were removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:19F0:BD48:FC93:941E:B06C (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration
Talk:Tulipwood (Somerset, New Jersey)

message: Talk:Tulipwood (Somerset, New Jersey)/temp
...only sightly better though. You interjected "of the Williams & Guion Black Star Line", but what evidence do you have for this? The company was liquidated in 1886 after the death of the owners, and the house was only buiilt in 1892, so... Fram (talk) 14:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Stephen Williams the original owner of the house was the son of John Stanton Williams the owner of the Williams & Guion Black Star Line. 47.37.160.32 (talk) 03:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Better paraphrasing
Talk:Nepheline

message: Ok...now that we know...
Nepheline, also called nephelite (from Greek: nephos, "cloud"), is a feldspathoid: a silica-undersaturated aluminosilicate, Na3KAl4Si4O16, that occurs in intrusive and volcanic rocks with low silica, and in their associated pegmatites. It is very occasionally found in mica schist and gneiss.
...what the heck is the stuff most commonly used for?!?!  That should be in the first paragraph as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.227.45.26 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 18 November 2007
:Mother nature uses it to make quartz free igneous rocks. In some regions these rocks hold up trees and houses... Some of these rocks, nepheline syenite, are used in glassmaking. Why should that be in the first paragraph? Vsmith (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the stuff for?!?! 

message: NaAlSi04 is not radioactive but KNa3Al4Si4O16 which is the typical composition of natural nepheline would be very sligtly radioactive due to the potassium.95.192.20.73 (talk) 23:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radioactivity
Talk:Florida State Road 686

message: Have anyone seen the new sign on Northbound US 19 around the new 110th Street overpass?  It shows Roosevelt Blvd./East Bay Blvd. as designated as FL SR-686A, that's new! 97.96.66.61 (talk) 02:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Egg incubation

message: i don't tihnk this is how incubators really are!!!! 
please an other interesting subject is incubation machines  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.247.21.173 (talk) 22:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I think eggs are generally rotated or turned by the incubating parent, perhaps every 15 mins. I think that this is to prevent the embryo from sticking to one side of the inside of the egg shell, a position from which the chick will not be able to get out of its egg. Artificial incubators turn or rock eggs to simulate this. Snowman (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conditions in birds 
Talk:Laško Brewery

message: I don't know who wrote this, but I'd never heard of Radenska mineral water until I first came to Slovenia in 2004, and it certainly isn't world-famous in the sense that French Perrier or Italian San Pellegrino water are. For one thing, I don't think Radenska is on sale in other countries (except perhaps in the former Yugoslavia) - unlike Laško beer, which you do occasionally come across in places like Italy or Austria (but I wouldn't even describe Laško as world-famous). I think this is a term you have to be very sparing with when writing Wikipedia articles!2A00:EE2:6200:8B00:745C:90B2:823C:4E15 (talk) 11:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radenska "world-famous"?
Category talk:Base-dependent integer sequences

message: Please note that the policies (or traditions) of the German language  and the English language wikipedia differ on the question of which articles are "appropriate" (or: notable, deserving, relevant, etc) for Wikipedia. 
# If (as in this category) the definition of a sequence depends on a numeral system,  an article about such a sequence is likely to be considered irrelevant by German Wikipedians and in danger of being erased soon. Cf. the german article on Keith-numbers, the discussion about it on the german maths portal and the discussion about its deletion.
# In any case, look at the  criteria of relevance for articles on mathematical topics. 
If you follow these guidelines, you save your own and others time. Thank You! --KleinKlio 17:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translators to the German wikipedia, please note!
Talk:Aiken Tennis Club

message: The Aiken Tennis Club is unique among court tennis Clubs in that it boasts four world champions who have learned the game at that club. These world champions are Northrup Knox, 1959 - 1969, G. H. (Pete) Bostwick, 1969 - 1972, James F. Bostwick, 1972-1976, and Camden Riviere, 2016-2018 and 2022 - now. ATCvicepresident (talk) 15:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:KDLT tower

message: Although this is the tallest structure in the state, there is likely never to be any lengthy encyclopaedic information written and published about this tower, like many other similar structures. Ohconfucius 07:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --Wow (talk) 06:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Most of the references are to the previous KDLT-TV tower, which is 1500' tall and was used for analog broadcasts. That tower is no longer used, but the newer 1999' tower is still used for digital broadcasts. Extensive editing and reorganization should be done to distinguish between the two towers. Lukpac (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Lukpac , the article has sources from 2008, 2015 and 2017. The 2008 source says 2000'. The 2015 and 2017 sources say 1500'. The FCC database says 1999' (609 meters) with the tower built in 1998. It's kind of perplexing.  -- GreenC 19:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Are you saying there are TWO towers and the the 1999' tower referenced in the FCC database is different from the 1500' tower given in the 2015 and 2017 sources?  -- GreenC 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Yes, there are two towers. The newer ("digital") 1999' tower built in 1998 and the older ("analog") 1500' (actually 1565') tower built in 1976. The old tower is about 42 miles WNW of the new tower, south of Salem, SD at 43°37'56.0" N 097°22'25.0" W. Lukpac (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  done. -- GreenC 16:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflation of old and new towers 

message: Please add details about the analog tower collapse on 12 May 2022. 
Cited article link https://www.dakotanewsnow.com/2022/05/13/storm-downs-dakota-news-now-broadcasting-tower-near-salem/
Tower confirmed as destroyed with google maps view. 2600:1700:3D45:10:DF23:AECC:582F:C6EF (talk) 22:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2023
Talk:Butterfly bend

message: Under the Security heading, we have "The study, however, recommended the Double fisherman's knot because the butterfly bend was 'almost impossible to untie after a significant load of about 1,000 lbs. was applied.'" However, I read the cited source,  Knot Break Strength vs Rope Break Strength at http://caves.org/section/vertical/nh/50/knotrope-hold.html, and the study didn't actually test the alpine butterfly as a bend, but rather as an end loop (like the way you'd use a bowline). You can confirm this by reading the "Method" section, which states "the Bowline, Fig. 8 end and bight, and the Butterfly knot had one end on the bollard. Bollards on both ends held the Fisherman's, and Sheet Bend knots." They were using one bollard for the "butterfly knot," grouping it in the same category as the loops, not the bends.
Conversely, the site http://www.animatedknots.com/alpinebend/index.php states that "the big advantage of the Alpine Butterfly Bend is... one that is easy to undo even after a heavy load." My own experience confirms this. The two loops on the end act like a hinge to break the back of the bend, just like you have in the zeppelin bend, the sheet bend, and the bowline for example.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.21.138 (talk) 02:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: Shouldn't somebody expand this thing? It's an extremely notable knot. I'd do it, but I don't know very much about it.   Jonathan321 (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: It's interesting that in the step-by-step image, the first image shows the blue going over-under-over, but the red goes under-over-over... is that right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellznrg (talk • contribs) 00:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Step-by-step
Talk:Keystone Wye

message: The article calls the high bridge a "single-hinged arch," but I passed by the bridge yesterday and I'm pretty sure I saw a three-hinge arch.  I thought there were hinges at the abutments, besides the hinge at the top of the arch? —Mmathu (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single-hinged arches? 
Template talk:Macy's, Inc.

message: I believe that a separate template should be made for defunct stores prior to the 2006 merger.  I am open to debate, but there are dozens and dozens of stores that are Wiki notable and could be listed.  Without playing favorites, there is not really any other good way to handle it.  However, if there is a strong opinion a new line of notable earlier defunct stores could be included, but it should be equitable in its inclusion of most wiki notable stores.  For example, go to the what links here pages of each of the chains listed on the current template and add all the predecessors found.TonyTheTiger 17:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking that suggestion to heart, I am now working on a template which takes into account ALL nameplates incorporated into Macy's, including the 2006 crop from May Company.  While it may have been this group that truly pushed Macy's into its current status as a national retailer (well, all but 5 states, but that's another discussion...), I really believe that it may be fairer put them with the other historic chains. — ArkansasTraveler 14:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The split of historic nameplates is now complete into the Macy's history template, with several names added to the 2006-merged names.  Possibly the only notable name not currently in the template (because of a lack of an article on the subject) is O'Connor, Moffat & Co., the first predecessor to Macy's in California, and the bedrock for Macy's West. — ArkansasTraveler 23:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Antwerp International Airport

message: To the IP-user who, presumably in good faith, removed the mention of the grass runway: the grass runway does exist, and is used, though rarely. It is clearly visible on satellite images, and correctly rendered on https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.1897/4.4632  Allow me to insist you should discuss first, on this talk page preferably, before bluntly removing valuable and correct information. Jan olieslagers (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grass runway
Talk:HD Mountains

message: Hey, I see you want to create this in your own words, that is wonderful. But please wait until the copied version is deleted, then create a fresh start. We try to avoid copyright violations being in the edit history if possible. By deleting and starting fresh the history does not contain the offending version.
An admin should delete it within an hour or so, please don't be discouraged. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Thanks for your speedy and required attention to keeping this page legit.  I was not intending to disrupt the flow in which things work. I believed that I was supposed to just clean up the page and re-submit it.  My first article and my first mistakes have been made. Thank you again for your concern on the behalf of the community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rylincoln (talk • contribs) 10:04, November 7, 2006
:No problem, thanks for listening. Mistakes are allowed here, people will give you helpfull advice when you do. Thanks for your patience with our proccess. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is looking good. Keep it up! Sorry for all the hassle before. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I get it. 

message: What does the HD stand for! 2605:59C8:51BA:5E10:60C1:EED0:D5B0:40A0 (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HD mountains
Talk:Amazonica

message: It seems impossible to find any information about this lady. Where, for example, was her birth name found? --137.205.76.44 17:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be good if there were some more redirects to here, such as "Victoria Harrison".--212.56.109.125 23:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 

message: This page needed a picture, so I added one from my collection. I took it at a concert Spalec 86 17:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New picture
Talk:Heat–Knicks rivalry

message: Does anyone know which game it was in the 2000 playoffs where Latrell Sprewell called a controversial timeout while falling out of bounds? I think that should be mentioned, too.
That was game 7.
Also, wasn't Charlie Ward suspended from the brawl and not Allan Houston?
I'm a little confused by the table myself.  It has both postseason and playoff wins listed separately and with different amounts.  Is postseason supposed to be regular season? matt91486 (talk) 20:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Someone tagged this article as not meeting notability requirements.  Anyone who followed the NBA in the late 90's knows Heat-Knicks is a notable rivalry.  To that extent, I provided a reference in the lead to a Sport Illustrated countdown that ranks it as the NBA's third best rivalry.  There are probably more citations out there.  And really, that is the problem with this article, not that it's lacking in notability but that there are no references supporting the notable occurrences mentioned in the article. To that extent, I've removed the notability tag and added a reference tag. TempDog123 (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability vs. References
Talk:Line segment

message: the definition is correct but misleading in combination with the image:
A = a, but B != b
i think it is better to use the formula:
 (1-t)a+tb
(and change the b!=0 assumption to a!=b) so that a and b correspond to the endpoints of the line segment as expected.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.175.8.13 (talk • contribs) 18:05, November 7, 2006
:I've changed a and b to \mathbf{u} and \mathbf{v} to emphasize that they are vectors and added that \mathbf{u} and \mathbf{u+v} are the end points of L. This should help reduce the confusion. Paul August ☎ 00:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says zero curvature, not zero radius. —Tamfang (talk) 07:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: line segmets  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.202.251.108 (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  lines 

message: In the current version, we have on top of the page a picture that suggests that a line segment is defined to be the conjunction of two vectors. Can anybody make sense of that? Else I propose that the picture is deleted. Bob.v.R (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The intersection of two rays, rather (and not just any two).  It's not the definition I'd use, but it works. —Tamfang (talk) 19:35, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing picture 

message: Should the definition of a line segment not be restricted to real vector spaces (real affine geometries) or, if a generalization ist intended, to vector spaces over ordered fields ? Ag2gaeh (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: Hi all. Quick question: Why does 1-ball redirect to here? There's no explanation of 1-ball in the article.
Devinthepeng (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-targeted the redirect to n-ball. fgnievinski (talk) 17:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1-ball redirect 

message: What is lline segments 45.64.83.21 (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  math
Talk:Royal Cornwall Museum

message: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-62048318
©Geni (talk) 23:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: May be at risk of closing

message: https://bpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.bristol.ac.uk/dist/7/677/files/2020/07/Truro-Cat-3.pdf
©Geni (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source for Iset-tayef-nakht if it ever leaves draft status
Talk:Sahib

message: The term has had frequent use in India and still does as it is used by Sherpas to refer to the foreign mountaineers the Sherpas guide or support on treks or expeditions. --Bentonia School 15:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not used in India? 

message: The first paragraph says the word means "companion" in Arabic, and the section "Colonial and modern use" says it means "owner".
What are the actual meanings of the words, present or past, in Arabic or other languages where it has been borrowed?
Thanks! --Cotoco (talk) 09:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original/current meanings
Talk:Glenn Strange

message: The article said that he was the only person to play Frankenstein's monster numerous times. I'm changing this, because it' wrong. Boris Karloff played the monster in Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein, and Son of Frankenstein.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tithonfury (talk • contribs) 02:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  numerous times 

message: If he was born in August of 1899 shouldn't he have been 75 at the time of his death in September 1974?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.34.246.79 (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age at death 

message: I am considering looking for more referenced info on Glenn Strange's 12 years on Gunsmoke, and to move current data and start a separate "Television work" section. Most of his TV work was on westerns, but that new section would have a selection of monster movie photos beside it. Does anyone have objections to reducing the number of Frankenstein monster photos to no more than three? I believe his work in westerns was just as significant as being Frankenstein's monster, and that all those photos overshadows his western work. I will look for more Gunsmoke information with reliable references, and come back here to see if anyone objects to reducing the number of monster-role photos. Karenthewriter (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and deleted all but 2 Frankenstein's monster photos, which I put in the Frankenstein movie section. I added another Western Mail photo to the main Career section, since most of Glenn Strange's acting was in westerns. Karenthewriter (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are 7 Frankenstein monster photos needed? 

message: the Frankenstein Monster in this photo is not Strange, rather the Monster portrayed by Bela Lugosi. 2600:4040:ACBB:6C00:B5D9:51E2:20EE:66B5 (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo shown with Lon Chaney & Frankenstein
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-06 White People

message: I honestly wish it would be such minor issue the only aspect of the dispute going on in the White people entry. This page (that I personally prefered made a disambiguation page, though I'm a minority in that) has gone through intense POV disputes basically between a core of responsible wikipedians and a number of editors, mostly anonymous (though now I believe the page is semiprotected) that want it to fit to their "white nationalist" POVs. 
After the semiprotection, a consensus was reached and the article cleaned up and briefly consolidated. The only registered editor with that specific POV (User:Dark Tichondrias) retired from the dispute after having advocated certain version because Stormfront and another white nationalist group thought like her. Then a new user, User:Thulean, appeared out of nowhere and fully focused on this article, trying to bring it to the "racialist" POV. Naturally, other editors, including myself, reverted and commented. 
Thulean entered the discussion but did not accept compromises with the already estabilished consensus. While this discusion was going on, DarkTichondrias (another race-only focused user, btw) reappeared and started doing edits, first minor ones, then major ones under the pretext of minor ones. Thulean joined her. 
Yesterday I reverted to the consensuated version and made an RFC. --Sugaar 18:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It's much more complex

message: Obviously the real scope of the concept of white (European, Caucasoid, more or less light skinned, etc.) is in the background of this particular sub-dispute. But one important thing is that a majority of editors wants the article to be sucint and delimited, keeping the discussion on what's race in the Human race article and the particular issues concerning the USA in the White American entry, while Thulean and DT prefer to extend teh article indefintely in accordance with their particular POV. 
I think that Psychohistorian is a responsible Wikipedian and that his position is in agreement with a wide majority of editors, now and in the "historical" context of that  controversial page. Psychohistorian and I have not always been in agreement but both have tried to reach consensus and worked intensely to keep the article NPOV. 
His edit is within the standard consensus-making and NPOV policies of Wikipedia, at least in my opinion. The attitude of Thulean is at least clearly POV. --Sugaar 18:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The particular dispute discussed here