lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Laurel Run, Pennsylvania

message: More and more graphics (long infobox, chart, photos) have been added to this article over the last several years, causing sandwiched text and giving the article a cluttered look that makes it difficult to read, particularly for people with visual impairments. The formatting, as it stands now, appears to violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style/Accessibility standards which urge editors to "Avoid placing images on the left hand side as a consistent left hand margin makes reading easier" and "Avoid sandwiching text between two images or, unless absolutely necessary, using fixed image sizes." At this point, the photo needs to be removed or repositioned and the "Historical population" chart needs to be removed or reformatted and repositioned in order to bring the article back into compliance with the MOS and make it more accessible for Wikipedia users with visual impairments. 47thPennVols (talk) 11:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo and chart formatting needs to be reviewed and improved
Talk:New Columbus, Pennsylvania

message: More and more photos, charts/other textboxes have been added to this article over the last several years, giving it an increasingly cluttered look that makes it very difficult to read, particularly for people with visual impairments. At least several of these additions appear to violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style/Accessibility standards which urge editors to "Avoid placing images on the left hand side as a consistent left hand margin makes reading easier" and "Avoid sandwiching text between two images or, unless absolutely necessary, using fixed image sizes." At this point, at least one photo and chart need to be removed or repositioned in order to bring the article back into compliance with the MOS and make it more accessible for Wikipedia users with visual impairments. 47thPennVols (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo, infobox and other chart/textbox/image formatting needs to be reviewed and improved
Talk:Plymouth, Pennsylvania

message: I agree with the idea that this article is far too long, but I left it as class=start, until someone is able to shorten it. I added the Energy template, as clearly much of the article is about coal mining. See Wikipedia:Splitting for some possibilities. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the template because not all subtopics can be notable enough to have their own articles. Removing valuable information due to "length" won't help. Cat is a good article as a long, sufficient article. --George Ho (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far too long 

message: A visit home left me SHOCKED. What happened? Kraynak (talk) 23:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decline from 1972 to today 

message: Is there still ritual’s & summon’s still being done here ? 2601:98A:D00:8950:7C64:C1F3:950F:BD97 (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ritual’s
Talk:Watertown, Ohio

message: Presumably, the Watertown Historic District includes some or all of the unincorporated community of Watertown, Ohio.  Another editor added some info about it to this article.  Following that lead, i just added a NRHP infobox and some more.  However, I would support any editor who wishes to develop the material on Watertown Historic District, and who, with information, judges it is best to split it out of this article on the community.  It may be the case that the historic district is just in the area, and is named after the nearby community.  It may be the case that the historic district includes only part of the community, and deliberately excludes other parts.  In such cases, it would probably be cleaner and easier to have a separate article on the historic district, which is wikipedia-notable on its own.  On the other hand, in the absence of info, it is okay by me for historic district to be covered in the community article. doncram (talk) 18:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NRHP historic district
Talk:Shickshinny, Pennsylvania

message: I have attempted to make the demographics more readable, and included a link to the records themselves for more information. I also took removed the population density stat for two reasons. 1. It’s not actually stated in the census. 2. The population density is almost 3 times the size of the population while the area is only half that of the density (0.4 sq mi compared to 1 sq mi). I think its clearer to say that there were 959 people living on 256 acres of land than saying there is a density of 2,591.2 per square mile. Similar idea for the housing density.  User1728 (talk) 07:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics
Talk:Trace Elliot

message: My citations aren't pretty.  The web sources for information on the history of Trace Elliot are fairly thin.  There was a seemingly plausible write-up that someone else had placed in Wiki that has been cached by Google, but since I was unable to cross reference a lot of this information, it can't be used.  The information presented is as accurate as I could find, but I would appreciate any other sources that could strengthen these citations.
Avaktar 22:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to say the article looks accurate to me. I've been using and following Trace Elloit gear for a while now.  Unfortunately the internet is not always a good source for references, so it's a shame that Wikipedia replies on them so heavily. DavidRavenMoon (talk) 02:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not a shame, because it enforces that articles are based on reliable sources of information, and not just repetitions of opinion or urban legends. Problem I'm seeing here is not unreferenced information, it's that I'm looking at the Trace catalog, and some parts of this article are copied from it word-for-word. That's an NPOV problem at the least, and at worst is a copyright infringement. Dementia13 (talk) 02:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

message: Given that Peavey has finally shuttered Trace Elliot, this article needs a serious update, however I'm not the person to do it. It's unfortunate that so much of Trace history is blurry because so many people were involved and want to take credit for everything that was ever great about TE. Clive Button seems to be the best resource for accurate TE data these days. Hopefully somebody can do this article justice with a good update/rewrite.  Status4 (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for an update
Talk:Ismere Diploma

message: This 'two pens' business is not only rather confusing as it seems to imply that the second section was by a different hand.  Rather it is the same hand, with little notable difference in pen, but more significantly a light ink. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.231.250 (talk • contribs) 
:You're right that it's confusing.  I've made a change to the text, to try to clarify it.  As for whether it's a new pen or lighter ink, I can't be sure myself, but Campbell (cited) definitely says it's a new pen, so I'm inclined to stick with that unless you know of other sources.  If you do, please go ahead and edit to suit. Mike Christie (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two pens
Talk:Tomaszów County, Łódź Voivodeship

message: Shouldn't it be named "Tomaszów Mazowiecki County" since Polish name for it is "powiat tomaszowski" (Tomaszow County) and not "powiat tomaszowsko-mazowiecki" (Tomaszow Mazowiecki County)? For example, other county from Poland, that I know of, that is in similar situation of not having matching name to its capital is Kamień County (powiat kamieński) while its capital city is Kamien Pomorski (which would make it called "powiat kamienio-pomorski") for which Wikipedia uses name "Kamien County" instead "Kamien Pomorski". In conclusion, I believe the article should be renamed to "Tomaszów County, Łódź Voivodeship" TheEditMate (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name
Talk:Wieruszów County

message: This article should be rewritten following the Polish site. The text about the massacres has been copied many times throughout the internet and is obviously corrupted (e.g. spelling of the village name). Datner's book had its point in the '60s, but should now be considered outdated. The article Invasion of Poland is a possible place for any accurate information. -- (A German citizen, not a historian) 94.218.181.224 (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John George Bourinot (younger)

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only covers the basic information on the topic, and as low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 20:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Hanover Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania

message: The phrase "massacred American settlers" is misleading as it suggests non-combatants were killed. The academic consensus is that no women or children were killed during the July 1778 raid on the Wyoming Valley. Have changed the sentence to: "On July 3, 1778, Loyalist and Iroquois forces routed the Patriot militia at the Battle of Wyoming in present-day Exeter." Griffin's Sword (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Marcelino García Toral

message: He is 168 cm, and he was listed 170 cm. If you know him it's easy to see that he is 170 cm as the tallest
https://arteysalero.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/marcelino-87-88.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trucoplus (talk • contribs) 20:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong height

message: The San Mames club have just confirmed him as their new manager https://twitter.com/AthleticClub/status/1345844156501995522 Culloty82 (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That link says that the basis of an agreement has been reached, so his appointment is just a formality but we can add it when officially confirmed. Valenciano (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletic Bilbao
Talk:Fair Access Policy

message: Torrents are not limited to 50GB, as the article says "as large as 50GB" (or so), there are torrents that are 200GB + 24.129.237.34 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

message: This article is missing quite a few things from it, for instance, the justification for the FAP (teehee). It was explained to me that if an ISP, for instance a satellite ISP, could ensure that their investment in satellite time, transmitters, etc. is not bumping their cost into a higher bracket, thus making internet more expensive for each of their customers. It also allows them to (pretend to) fairly charge customers for the bandwidth they are using.
The article should also have a short introduction phrased something like
"Fair Access Policy is a Bandwidth limit placed by Internet Service Providers on some customers in an attempt to provide equal service to all customers."
Also the "See also" section should be links and explanations only, not a biased rant against the corporations.
Personally, I support net neutrality in the idea that an ISP should Provide the whole internet, not just the "good" sites, seeing as how obviously relative the terms can be, and that Fair Access Policies should be made to actually be somewhat fair, but presenting an incredibly biased view on it in an article won't convince anyone. This article has a lot of potential and if I was better at researching I would help more.   LIMEY (talk) 09:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Neutrality
Talk:Głogów County

message: I'm looking at the map.  Is it safe to assume that the area in red is Głogów County?  Perhaps, but it doesn't say so.  MORE IMPORTANTLY, what is the peach-shaded area in which the red area is located?  I guess it might the Lower Silesian Voivodeship, but this is very unclear, especially to a non-Pole who doesn't know what a Voivodeship is and what its subdivisions are.  This is piss-poor work. 74.178.230.17 (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: All right - yes, that's what it is.--Kotniski (talk) 08:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of context in the map 

message: If population density is 200/km sq, it cannot be 520/sq mile 178.37.74.220 (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population density
Talk:Kłodzko County

message: The redirect Landkreis Glatz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Crainsaw (talk) 07:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Landkreis Glatz]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Inline templates

message: This page indicates where some of the work of WikiProject Inline Templates can be directed. However, Template:Inline tags, the project page WP:INLINE, and the :Category:Inline templates have dramatically different versions of what templates are included (navbox, list, category). I am working on standardization and this will include significant changes to all three pages. Discussion should probably centralize at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Inline Templates. JJB 12:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Inline Templates
Talk:Gmina Abramów

message: All remaining articles on Polish municipalities called "Xxx Commune" to be moved to "Gmina Xxx" as recently agreed here. --Kotniski 10:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles moved. The "Gmina XXX" format, however, affects category sorting. I suggest that you put a  in the bot's code, rather than in just one category. Duja► 12:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Tomaszów County, Lublin Voivodeship

message: Shouldn't it be named "Tomaszów Mazowiecki County" since Polish name for it is "powiat tomaszowski" (Tomaszow County) and not "powiat tomaszowsko-lubelski" (Tomaszow Lubelski County)? For example, other county from Poland, that I know of, that is in similar situation of not having matching name to its capital is Kamień County (powiat kamieński) while its capital city is Kamien Pomorski (which would make it called "powiat kamienio-pomorski") for which Wikipedia uses name "Kamien County" instead "Kamien Pomorski County". In conclusion, I believe the article should be renamed to "Tomaszów County, Lublin Voivodeship" TheEditMate (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name
Talk:Octave Chanute Aerospace Museum

message: Hi Wikipedians, does anyone know why the museum closed down? And the planes in its collection and what happened with them? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 10:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No more money.Bigturtle (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for closure?
Talk:Silhouettes (The Rays song)

message: I've done the Infobox and generally got the ball rolling from the very minimal article that was up. Hope people find it useful. Of course I hope others will join in. For starters, if someone could find a good image, that would be nice. Should I do an Infobox for the Herman's Hermits version, too? What about The Diamonds version? Brettalan (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox and such

message: Was the song, "Dancing Silhouettes," recorded by Jackie DeShannon, inspired by "Silhouettes"? PlaysInPeoria (talk) 14:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dancing Silhouettes
Talk:Nor-

message: So far, so good - the definition seems clear. However, how about the valine- norvaline pair? or leucine vs. norleucine? In these molecules CH2 group seems not to be replaced by hydrogen, but moves so, that the chain is no more branched. So is there any rule general enough to cover both cases?
Dariusz Michalczyk darim@uwm.edu.pl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.184.4.41 (talk) 15:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: nor amino acid query (valine/norvaline, etc.)

message: …but needs attention of a more experienced editor, in re: position relative to the other examples.  Note, this nor-homo example is complex, but it must serve at present, until an example pair of structures can be found where a ring is contracted relative to another known substance.  (Here, one ring is contracted, while the adjacent is expanded.)  In any case, it is critically important to make clear that the "nor" can indicate removal of atoms from within rings (and not just peripheral methyl groups).  Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See also opening nor-amino acid query, at top of page.  If that contributor would like to learn Wikipedia, I would be glad to assist.  Le Prof  Leprof 7272 (talk) 17:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New nor structure example added
Talk:Extensible automorphism

message: I wonder if its relevant that a fairly large project was undertaken to systematically study group properties as algebraic objects, almost entirely to try and prove that extensible automorphisms are inner?
For instance see some of the 22 pages in gp:Category:Terminology related to Extensible automorphisms problem, as well as the huge amounts of structure put onto group properties.
I know of several group theorists who have found his work interesting, but it is not clear to me if it is relevant to this page.
If not, then it might be best just to merge the content from here into inner automorphism, taking the Schupp article as a guide. JackSchmidt (talk) 21:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant
Template talk:Interbank networks

message: If Maestro is listed here, why is VISA's equivalence Visa Electron missing?  And shouldn't regular VISA and MasterCard be added too? (Stefan2 23:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2007

message: Maestro is a debit card from MasterCard, usually online only, but sometimes also offline. I'm not sure what this has to do with cash machine networks. Or maybe you are talking about a different Maestro? The link goes to Maestro (debit card), which describes the debit card and not a cash machine network. (212.247.11.155 (talk) 22:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2007

message: Is there any chance that this sea of red links will ever turn blue? I think this navbox should be trimmed of the lesser known networks. -- œ™ 02:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Angel Baby (Rosie and the Originals song)

message: The Wikipedia entry for "Angel Baby" says Rosie Hamlin wrote the song when at Mission Bay High School.  The entry for Rosie and the Originals says she wrote it when at Sweetwater High School.  Which is correct? 2601:19E:4485:B8D0:7CEF:E61F:F351:1C04 (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. According to Rosalie Hamlin's blog, she attended both high schools, but doesn't specify where she wrote the song. Since both articles cite the same San Diego Reader source, which states Mission Bay, I've corrected the Sweetwater claim. But perhaps the Reader leapt to an assumption and both should be listed? 174.209.37.193 (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct high school?
Talk:Book of Love (band)

message: I added a (scholarly) reference that covers some of this, but by no means all of it. I haven't gone through and dealt with indicating inline what can be attributed to that source because, frankly, it's not a topic I'm all that interested in, but if someone does work on properly referencing this, you should definitely get hold of the Weisbard piece and cite what can be cited from there. - Jmabel | Talk 06:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: According to the band's own website, http://www.bookoflovemusic.com , the band's name is Book Of Love, not Book of Love. I'm hesitant to make the necessary change, specifically to the name of the page, as I am uncertain of the ramifications of such a change. - My Dog Is Bart (talk) 16:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Capitalization of the Band's Name 

message: For a band that probably had 8 or 9 actual notable minutes out of their allotted 15.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.73.228 (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is one damn lengthy, excessively detail-oriented page... 
Talk:Infiniti G37

message: Yo does anybody think that this was a big improvement from the last generation coupe.....because I've read a couple early test drive comments, they say that the car is better and the interior more lavish, the back seats are similar in size though....anybody got comments???? More Info?????—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zhour24 (talk • contribs).
:The interior certainly looked nice at NYIAS but it was just on display so I didn't get to sit in it.  It seems to be improved in every way but the performance appears to be the biggest improvement.  Anyway, I think it's the nicest Japanese coupe you can get new...  at least until the GT-R, NSX, and FT-HS are produced.~ Dusk Knight 23:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Generation comparison

message: The design of the car is one of its strongest points, being called the best looking coupe on the planet by various automobile magazines.
Ugh... I think the rewrite needs a rewrite.  There's too much opinion, too much unnecessary comparison, and not a single reference for any of it.  I'm going to revert for now.  If you have ideas, suggestions, objections, etc. please post them here before attempting a rewrite.~ Dusk Knight 04:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs a TON of attention. We can't seem to work the POV out of it, it needs sources, and the current revision seems to be plagiarized straight from some automotive publication. Karrmann 05:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I found it interesting that they jumped from 35 to 37.  I guess they wanted to avoid confusion with the H&K G36 assault rifle.
Whind Soull 00:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note, the name is directly related to the displacement of the engine! As with all infiniti. The G35 is 3.5L, G37 is 3.7L, QX45 is 4.5 and so on. It has nothing to do with succession of numbers really. The M35 and M45 are essentially the same with 2 different motors :) --SSChicken (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 35 to 37
Template talk:WikiProject Sports

message: This template has a major bug - it labels everything it is attached to as an "article", even when class=Category, etc., are used (see top of this pagel, which uses class=Template, for proof).  See  for code to do this properly.
Tables of content on talk pages with this template are showing up only when the "to to" list is expanded.  It is also associated with an error about a flag and a 1980 Olympic bronze.  SlowJog (talk) 01:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bug

message: See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Proposal:_Deprecate_importance_parameter_for_assessment_for_Sports - there's a proposal to remove the importance parameter from this template and no longer assess sports articles by importance, and only assess by quality.  SnowFire (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: |importance=
Thanks! SnowFire (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

text: * Pppery * it has begun... 22:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprecate importance?
Talk:Ministry of Health (British Columbia)

message: The name of the BC Ministry of Health has been changed to the Ministry of Health Services. Please see the Ministry's home page at http://www.gov.bc.ca/health/ . Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rthexton (talk • contribs) 18:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ministry has a 'new' name
Talk:Ministry of Children and Family Development (British Columbia)

message: Article is almost exclusively about foster care.
 There is no history or even description of the services offered by MCFD.
 Article needs extensive revision to bring it up to standards.
 Add referenced material and discuss on Talk page.Daffydavid (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional info needed. As it currently sits this article may be more appropriately titled Foster Care In BC. 

message: Needs this added. References always. Article is barely a stub now.Daffydavid (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of MCFD. 