lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Lord Lieutenancies

message: Do we really need this?  it seems mainly to duplicate the existing categories.  Morwen - Talk 17:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems rather oversized as well. -- Roleplayer 17:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is thought to move quickly from one Lieutenancy to another - categories are nice but it needs time to navigate. Furthermore I have changed the format, it is now smaller and can be hidden or shown. ~~ Phoe talk 15:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't the Northern Ireland lieutenancies be on the Ireland template, as well? That's what they were until 1922. Lozleader 17:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had it separated for a better overlook, but in principle, I would have nothing against this to change it. Phoe 19:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I've re-sorted the list based on the following:
* Separating out current and former lieutenancies to make it easier to see which are still offices held today; this also allows merger of Ireland and Northern Ireland sections
* Rearranging the countries to England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland: this was the order (1580s, 1690s, 1790s, 1830s, respectively) in which the countries gained regular Lord Lieutenants so it seems to make more sense than previously. 
Opera hat (talk) 23:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearrangement 

message: I have searched high and low for the names of anyone who held any of the lieutenancies for the counties corporate and thus populate the articles which are currently redlinks, and have found none. It would seem that, with the exception of the City of London and Haverfordwest (plus the Tower Hamlets and Cinque Ports), the lieutenancies of the counties corporate were *always* held jointly with that of the county at large. According to Sidney & Beatrice Webb's 'English Local Government from the Revolution to the Municipal Corporations Act Book II (1906) the holders of the office were specifically given authority over the whole county inclusive of liberties and franchises. It appears to have been part of the logic of the invention of lieutenancies to which sought to simplify the military administration of the country. The counties corporate were areas where the high sheriff did not have jurisdiction, but the lord lieutenant did. That being the case, I am going to be WP:BOLD and remove them from the template (or combine with their "mother" counties). Lozleader (talk) 13:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jointly-held lieutenancies
Talk:Adam Shore

message: I've heard at least two studio versions of "Tease Machine". I'm pretty sure that one version features Jani Lane and Steven Sweet, and I know that Warrant with Jani Lane and Steven Sweet have performed it in concert. I've heard that the other studio version, though, is with Adam Shore and Max Asher. Gringo300 17:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:White Town

message: Jyoti Mishra is also the name of a contestant in India's reality show Sa Re Ga Ma Pa 2007. Consider removing redirction from Jyoti Mishra to White Town.  asnatu (talk) 03:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some good reason this would not be called a "one hit wonder"? Fits the definition perfectly... 212.50.203.198 (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: This is a WP:BLP article. All content must be reliably sourced. From WP:BLP -  The content, which is sourced to the user profile on a social network aka WP:BLPPRIMARY source, is being challenged at Special:Permalink/1146111508#Social media source that other primary sources and any secondary sources could not be found. As such, I'm removing the said content and categories until it is backed up by reliable secondary sources. (cc ) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 21:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't WP:BLPSELFPUB validate this situation? -Xdtp (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Here they state they are loosely polyamorous and agender https://mathstodon.xyz/@Jyoti@mas.to/110069497056172038 1^infy (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @1^infy Thanks for the effort, but there seems to be a lot going on in that post. I am of the opinion that since this is not a straight forward fact (like date of birth, education) and that there is an ambiguity in the post, it would amount to interpretation/analysis of a primary source which we can't do. Perhaps you might want to post at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard ? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 04:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Once you do, please ping me from that discussion — DaxServer (t · m · c) 05:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Genderqueer and Polyamorous sourcing
Talk:In the Wake of Separation

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was leave (nomination withdrawn). Andrewa 20:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mixmag

message: While I appreciate people occasionally take time to update this, it seems somewhat pointless to do so, as the content is only really "valid" for a month. I'm therefore deleting it. Nick Cooper 13:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Somehow it crept back in under "current Content".  Removed again. The Dissident Aggressor 04:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Current issue" information

message: Unfortunately, this article has several exceptional claims (first, biggest, etc.) and the non-exceptional sources either no longer exist or never did.  This needs some serious cleanup and/or removal of those claims.  It smacks of either WP:COI or advertising.  The Dissident Aggressor 04:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COI verified and tagged.  See  above.  I suspect there have been others too. Toddst1 (talk) 23:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  exceptional claims require exceptional sources
Talk:Maria Amalia of Saxony

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Maria Amalia of Saxony.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 1, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-09-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Maria Amalia of Saxony.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: I've removed the word "some" from the first paragraph.  In this context it means "approximately".  The queen didn't have "approximately" 13 children, she had "exactly" 13 children.  At least, that's all that are mentioned in the article.  I'm not aware that there were any illegitimate children.Caeruleancentaur (talk) 06:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: @Caeruleancentaur Thanks for correcting. She was a faithful wife to her husband King Charles III. The Sri Lanka (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some? 

message: This is to get the opinion of Wikipedia readers regarding the necessity of the Equestrian Portrait of Maria Amalia of Saxony by Francesco Liani in this page. The Sri Lanka (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the equestrian portrait necessary?
Talk:Brian Barwick

message: I suggest the following be added to this article.  I am astounded that it was not already incorporated.
::'The "Barwick" moustache rumoured to have been lost to science for over 50 years, was relocated by Mr. Brian Barwick (of F.A. fame) some years back.  He proudly wears his face hair in this style in order to show-off his monumental achievement of rediscovery.' (Sasquatchuk 17:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moustache
Talk:Maria Luisa, Duchess of Lucca

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was move to Maria Louisa, Duchess of Lucca. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Support See above for my comment. Surtsicna (talk) 14:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Manuel Godoy

message: “Godoy has been one of the only two people in history (the other being Baldomero Espartero) to have held the title of "Prince" in the Kingdom of Spain, a dignity traditionally reserved for the heir to the throne.”
Surely "people" here ought to be replaced with something like "commoners"? Harfarhs (talk) 20:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of "Prince"
Talk:Richard Boswell

message: Do they live in the same house?  That is what I take from that statement. 
Also, since this is an encyclopedia entry, it does not seem correct to refer to Dale Earnhardt, Jr. by a nickname only.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.132.134 (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residing with Dale Jr?
Talk:Marica (disambiguation)

message: I understand that "Maritsa" does not contain the exact same letters as "Marica", but these do sound the same when transliterated from Bulgarian language. Also, few people would think of looking up "Myriam" to find an alternative spelling. --Cryout 17:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maritsa and Marica
Talk:Regigigas

message: When was it ever stated that Ho-oh is the guardian of the legendary cats, and Lugia of the legendary birds? - NP Chilla 12:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardian of the Legendary...? 

message: And btw, let's lock ALL the Pokemon pages shall we? I don't appreciae an article saying "ugly ugly ugly etc" 89.241.127.111 18:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles generally aren't protected because of one or two vandalisms. For one thing, that prevents many of Wikipedia's useful contributors from contributing simply because they don't have accounts. For another thing, it's not necessary because the vandalism can be reverted easily by any user. The vandalism rate needs to be extremely high before an article is protected (and even then, it's usually only semi-protected).—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 21:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only protected article for Pokemon I have seen is Mudkip and because of the whole So I her you liek Mudkipz thing (aee Talk page). -Fear teh Happy! 23:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're WAAAAAAAAAAAAY too late, Lati - Regigigas was semi'd because of Serebii.net. -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock 

message: The article says, "its ability, “Slow Start”, halves its attack and speed for the first few turns of a battle. This provides the challenge of weakening Regigigas without completely destroying it."
Since defence and special defence determine how much damage it will take when attacked, why does the article imply that a lower attack (how much damage it will do to you), and lower speed (how quickly it can attack), makes it easier to KO rather than simply weaken.
This doesn't make much sence at all, I wanted to see what everyone else thought before I edited the page... 
Bobcheezy 05:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harder to catch ?!
Talk:American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees

message: I believe the Campaigns section does not present an objective point of view, both in the references to positive accomplishments by AFSCME and the dispute between AFSCME and SEIU described at the end of the article.  In this former case (AFSCME achievements), there are no sources cited, and the section reads like an advertisement.  Citations should be provided to support the claims.  On the other hand, the reference to Illinois workers who "soundly rejected" AFSCME sounds unobjective.  A citation is provided, but a change in the language might help avoid the impression that a member of SEIU, a rival union to AFSCME, is posting negative comments.Deseavers 08:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned it up a little and tried to keep it neutral, in addition to mentioning the "follow the work" policy.--Orange Mike 16:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Entire article still resembles an advertisement for the organization instead of a third-party, neutral article about AFSCME. Most of this is just a copy-paste-edit from their site, although some of it has been tweaked over time. There is a ton of assumed political truths references in this Wikipedia entry. Believing something is true and actually being proven as truth is two separate things. Pointing out all of the political slants in this article would take up too much space in the talk page. Thanks. cipher_nemo (talk) 13:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Dispute [Campaigns] 

message: Well which is it? The link is broken, and the numbers listed are form 2008, so probably no longer accurate. Tad Lincoln (talk) 01:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second- or third-largest?
Talk:American Federation of Television and Radio Artists

message: As of today March 30, 2012 the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists no longer exists as a union or a corporation, It has been merged into a new union and organization called SAG-AFTRA. I would like to propose that it be noted that this is no longer an active union and the information be kept for historical purposes and a new page be created called SAG-AFTRA. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 22:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Overhaul Required 

message: As the article now stands, it suggests that radio has ceased to exist.  Many major-market radio stations are still unionized.  You will occasionally hear well-known conservative talk-show hosts complaining about being required to join a union (usually AFTRA) in order to appear on air.  Many top commercial voice-over artists are also union members.  121a0012 (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio
Talk:Benjamin Hardin Helm

message: There should be a reference to Mrs Helm. She must have been an active rebel, since she was pardoned by Lincoln (though I am not sure how she could be pardoned without being convicted in the first place).101.98.74.13 (talk) 06:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an amnesty program, see The Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction,  that covered persons who "directly or by implication, participated in the existing rebellion" and were not a member of several except classes such as U.S. military officers that resigned their commission and then fought for the Confederacy. Generic1139 (talk) 16:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emilie Helm 
Talk:Anarchism (social)

message: Please discuss before blanking the article or redirecting it. Hogeye 17:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No thanks. This is a clear pov fork and is in violation of policy as is anarchism (political). Your edit warring is really pointless and needs to stop. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 19:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously this is an attempt to avoid edit warring, by recognizing that there are (at least) two different definitions of anarchism. See anarchism (disambiguation). Hogeye 19:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a clear demonstration of bad faith. You know your proposal was rejected flat-out. Stop making pov forks. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 19:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

message: AaronS> "If anything, there has been an anti-authoritarian/anti-statist dichotomy."
I see you've come around to Hogeye's point of view, albeit with different terminology. You agree that there is an all who deny the legitimacy of the state definition and an all who deny moral authority definition. The problem I see with your terminology is that it is non-descriptive. The word "authority" can be interpreted in many ways. Is voluntary employment "authority"? It is to the anti-capitalists, but isn't to the pro-capitalists. Then again, if there is a short explanation of what is meant, like on the Neutral Disambiguation Page, then anarchism (anti-authoritarian) seems a reasonable alternative to anarchism (social) or anarchism (anti-capitalist). 216.55.185.224 17:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Different titles for this article
Talk:Cactus Data Shield

message: "White Lilies Island" by Natalie Imbruglia wasn't the first copy-protected CD in 2001. The Phillip Boa And The Voodooclub album "My Private War" was released earlier (2000) and was the first copy protected CD ever in Germany (and perhaps even worldwide): https://www.discogs.com/Phillip-Boa-The-Voodooclub-My-Private-War/release/530530  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E2:AF04:860:5D5C:F67D:BC49:76DB (talk) 16:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Album 

message: X&Y by Coldplay might be one of the albums using this protection. --Jack Zhang 07:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  X&Y 

message: I thought it would be a good idea to mention which CD was the first to be sold with the copy prevention on it. I have found the website  which states that the first UK release to use any copy-prevention was "White Lilies Island" by Natalie Imbruglia (which is a fantastic album, by the way). What I want to know is, was this the first to use it in the worldwide sense? If anyone could confirm this please, or find the album that would the first ever to use it (not just in the UK), then I think it would be a good thing to include. 
Apparently, the copy-protection meant that White Lilies Island suffered sales-wise, and due to numerous complaints, BMG replaced people's discs with later-released unprotected ones. Ortac 18:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Album 

message: I just spent some time cleaning up the Macrovision CDS-200 article, added mention of CDS-300, and then subsequently ran across this one.  This one is much more comprehensive, and focuses on the technical side of what the software does, whereas the other article is briefer, and focuses on the controversy in the press.  I'll see if I can get a merge started by moving the entirety of that article into a "controversy" section in this article, and then we can see where to go from there. EVhotrodder (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need to merge the [[Macrovision CDS]] article into this one.
Talk:Anarchism (political)

message: This article is about political anarchism - anarchism as pure antistatism. If you want to write about the anti-hierarchical or anti-capitalist form of anarchism, go to anarchism (social). Thank you. Hogeye 17:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No thanks. This is a clear pov fork and is in violation of policy as is anarchism (social). Your edit warring is really pointless and needs to stop. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 19:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously this is an attempt to avoid edit warring, by recognizing that there are (at least) two different definitions of anarchism. See anarchism (disambiguation). Hogeye 19:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or see the talk page of anarchism where most people have rejected your proposal for 2 articles. Stop your games hogeye. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 19:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Someone put up a template for deletion proposal, saying that the article is a "redundant duplicate of anarchism." Obviously it isn't, which anyone can tell by clicking on the anarchism article and comparing. This article covers a definition of "anarchism" which is disputed or rejected in the anarchism article. This article covers anarchism as pure anti-statism. Unlike the other article, religious and pro-capitalist forms of anarchism are included - any political philosophy which holds the state to be an unnecessary evil may be included. Currently, this article differs from the anarchism article in several ways: 1) it includes a timeline of anarchism, 2) it includes a chart showing the main forms of economic-related anarchisms, 3) it compares different anarchist property systems in a chart. But the main two differences between this and the anarchism article are: this is inclusive and doesn't promote anarcho-socialism as the only "true" anarchism, and this article is not locked. So I will hereby delete the template. Hogeye 23:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You know your proposal for creating two pages was rejected. Stop this crap. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 04:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion Proposal
Talk:Hand dryer

message: The "Developments" section's tone is inappropriate. Two specific concerns:
(1) It's written like a Dyson advertisement/press release
(2) The phrase "It seems that the Dyson Airblade may be a copy of" is non-encyclopedic in tone; it sounds like original research. Given the fact that it's sourced, it should be rephrased to a more definite, professional tone (i.e. "The Dyson Airblade is a copy of...") -- if that cannot truthfully be said, then it's non-encyclopedic knowledge and therefore has no place in the article.
Thanks. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Developments section

message: U.S.A - Dyson 
Brazil - Dakmark secador de mãos 
France - 
Italy - 
Japan -  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renatodellisola (talk • contribs) 14:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The most famous hand dryer brands by country 

message: Here's a story about the Facebook posting, which cites several scientific studies which are more recent than the ones quoted in this article. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/health/hand-dryer-petri-dish.html
Are Hand Dryers Actually Full of Bacteria? A Viral Photo Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story
By MAGGIE ASTOR
New York Times
FEB. 9, 2018
--Nbauman (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT Story
Talk:1470s

message: Please consider the following changes to words on the map:
*Moscovy --> Muscovy
*Genovese --> Genoese
**("Genoese" is more common than "Genovese", and "Genovese" can be confused with "Genevese".)
*Duke of Burgandy --> Duchy of Burgundy
:(Please see list of adjectival forms of place names.)
Please consider changing the black font to a font which is easier to read.
Wavelength 18:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to words on map