lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rossana de los Ríos

message: A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here.  Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page.  After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions.  Thank you.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tennis expert do you still are alive? 181.124.240.141 (talk) 01:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: @Tennis expert  it is a big difference between 2008 and 2023 181.124.240.141 (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion concerning this article

message: I have changed the pronouns from "he/she" to "they/them" to start Wikipedia inclusive and without any gender discrimination for foreigners that aren't native of a English speaking country 181.124.240.141 (talk) 01:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusivity for all foreigners like Japanese did with Katakana names.
Talk:Mötley Crüe discography

message: Shouldn't somebody add the Cruefest 1 DVD to this page, or are we waiting for something? --99.238.168.188 (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crue Fest DVD 

message: Saints of Los Angeles has NOT gone gold, and their recent singles have not charted as high as the page says. I keep reverting this every few weeks when I swing by here. (The Elfoid (talk) 13:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs protection 

message: There have been several changes to chart positions and it looks like they may be vandalism.  Is there a verified version that can be reverted to? snigbrook (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart positions 
Talk:Beidaihe, Qinhuangdao

message: How can there be 32 days of participation in December... Are all December days rainy in Beidaihe, including December 32nd each year?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.206.110.253 (talk) 02:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a typo. Should probably be 2 or 3 not 32. However, the original source doesn't seem to be linked correctly so I can't find out the correct number. Rincewind42 (talk) 10:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: They aren't even for the correct place. I would expect a more delayed spring in Beidaihe along the coast, but, nope, the source says  TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 16:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate data doesn't make sense 
Talk:Qinggil County

message: XZQH.org says 1941.  Cihai says 1944. According to , the page  once said that the county was founded in 1941. In the absence of an existing good source, I am putting both years on the page until a determination can be made. Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1941/1944 founding
Talk:Cangzhou

message: The Iron Lion picture looks good. :) DigitalNinja 20:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does it border to the east?? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Border to the east
Talk:German submarine U-515

message: This isn't right: "...stopping at St. Nazaire to pick up two T5 Zaunkönig torpedoes, which were designed to zigzag to improve their chances of finding a target within a convoy." The T-5 was an acoustic homing torpedo. The zig-zag, called Federapparat (FAT) in German, was a modification to standard torpedoes like the G7e. These are two separate things. The reference I have handy (Mulligan) says U-515 had T-5 torpedoes on this patrol, but doesn't say how many or whether she also carried FATs. Rees11 (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Set It Off (film)

message: I've trimmed the overlong plot summary using a version from an older revision . --TS 23:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Parvoviridae

message: Which other ones infect humans?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.7.247 (talk) 22:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Human Viruses

message: Canine parovirus - "parvo" is an important veterinary disease. I added the "See Also" but more is needed Linlithgow (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Canine Viruses
Talk:Dependoparvovirus

message: This doesn't make much sense in my mind. They still contain proteins (antigens) that can be immunogenic. The fact that they are subviral satellites also does not protect them from an immune response, see hepatitis D virus as a counterexample. If dependoparvoviruses don't trigger an immune response in their hosts, it is most likely because they are not pathogenic enough to become "interesting" for the host immune system. Perhaps they are even tolerated, if they can suppress replication of their helper virus and thus reduce the pathogenicity of that virus, without becoming harmful by themselves. --2003:E7:7732:BF77:8400:A786:EE52:4131 (talk) 00:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  not large enough to trigger an immune response
Talk:San Gabriel Fault

message: — Assignment last updated by PoppedCorn03 (talk) 05:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Category talk:Seismic faults of California

message: Should there be an integrated treatment of these "seismic faults of California"?  Currently there is only piecemeal treatment of some 50 faults, many of these just bare-bones stubs, and no consideration of how these are more notable than the other two hundred or so faults in California.  (I grant that the awareness of Wikipedia editors is a rough measure of public notability, and even of public interest.  But susceptible to being skewed by individual's particular interest.)  Nor is there anything relating these in an overall view.
As an example I submit what I did at Puget Sound faults, which provides a comprehensive regional view of the notable faults, along with aspects common to all.  Strong caveat: the California faults are so much more numerous, even if partitioned into northern and southern, that the same approach is probably not quite quite workable. But is there some other approach that might work?
Related to this is also the question of whether there should be some criteria of which faults should be included. (Separate discussion?)
By the way, there is an outstanding resource for three-dimensional views of California faults — see the picture and links at Southern California faults. 
Comments? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Should there be? Probably. Will there be? Maybe. It seems the really proper thing to do is to start a Wikiproject, decide on a standard presentation, and slowly upgrade all the articles to meet the standard format. The easier way to do it is to create an infobox which will at least present basic facts about each fault, and in the process of people filling in the blanks, they'll dig up enough material to write a fuller article; the structure of the infobox will at least suggest an article structure, too. I'd be willing to help out with ideas for an infobox, at least. Argyriou (talk) 03:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:   Perhaps a WikiProject would be a good way to go. I am unconvinced about the usefulness of an infobox,  The "basic facts" are basic enough they could probably be presented in a table, though with some 200 faults that seems unreasonable.  But perhaps there could be a suggested outline/format?  Which might tie-in with an article that addresses material common to all of these faults. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go at a possible format for a List of seismic faults of California at User:Mikenorton/sandbox - just a quick first draft to get feedback. Mikenorton (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should there be an integrated treatment of these faults?
Talk:Poxviridae

message: The Following Ramses_V, he died in 1145 BCE, not 2000 BCE.  Since I have no access to ref. [7], I cannot assess whether the error is therein or was introduced by using the reference in the article. --Ralf Muschall (talk) 12:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The ICTV has never listed Quokkapox virus in its official releases. Bervin61 (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramses V 

message: What happened to Quokkapox virus and others that were listed on this page and are no longer included?  --Nessie (talk) 15:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The ICTV has never listed Quokkapox virus in its official releases. Bervin61 (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing viruses? 

message: The statement that DNA-dependent RNA polymerase allows replication is potentially confusing.  It seems the author means that DNA-dependent RNA polymerase allows replication of virions by allowing the synthesis of new viral mRNA's and therefore viral proteins.  However, RNA polymerase won't help you with DNA replication--that's going to require a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase, right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.20.11.28 (talk) 19:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  replication
Talk:Buffalopox

message: A "buffalopox virus" doesn't seem to be officially listed as a virus species. As it is closely related to vaccinia virus, is it possible that most, if not all, cases of buffalopox are actually caused by a feral vaccinia virus?
Concerning cowpox, the two viruses seem to be unidentical. But as buffalopox can affect cows, some cases of pox-like disease in buffaloes may conversely be cowpox?
Both cowpox and vaccinia can infect humans and cause localized disease, as buffalopox can. This makes differential diagnosis more difficult. --2003:E7:7735:1987:1C21:CFDE:103C:3AFA (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  relationship to cowpox virus and vaccinia virus
Talk:Camelpox

message: In the "Cause" section, the article states "The Camelpox Virus (CMPV) that causes Camelpox is an Orthopoxvirus that is very closely related to the Vaccinia virus that causes Smallpox", but that isn't right is it?  The smallpox virus is Variola not Vaccinia.  The two are related, but Vaccinia is a variant of the Cowpox virus not the Smallpox virus.  Should this be changed to read "...is very closely related to the Variola virus that causes Smallpox"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lsisson (talk • contribs) 02:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaccinia Vs. Variola
Talk:Weymouth High School

message: Victuallers 15:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed the Students and Faculty section along with the Clubs & Organizations list. The former was useless, as there was no additional information provided after the exact number of students was provided. The latter was an obvious copy and paste job from the school's website. I couldn't see them in a seperate list article nor in the main article itself, and the website is linked at the bottom as well. « SCHLAGWERKTalk to me! 01:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sections 

message: This is a response to an inquiry made by user  regarding this article, which he left on my talk page here.
The issue with your , is that since the staff are living people, content relating to them must be in compliance with WP:BLP. This policy states that any contentious material about living people that is poorly sourced should "be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." You say you have sources, so if you would like to add that specific content about the school's staff, it must be properly sourced. You can find information on writing citations at WP:REFB and WP:VERIFY. Note that any contentious material must also be written from a neutral point of view, as outlined in WP:NPOV. You should also state why people are complaining about the staffs performance. Thank you. Meszzy2 (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forcemultiplyer Discussion March 2019
Talk:Lynn Riggs

message: This edit claims that two versions of the infobox present "exactly the same information". However, a comparison of the two shows that this is not the case, with the current version omitting genres of work and instead presenting a single (comparatively minor) point from the subject's extensive employment history. The subject is noted primarily for writing, not for teaching English for a year; the former presentation is thus more appropriate. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The listing of incredibly broad genres is pretty meaningless as most writers write different kinds of things, adds no real information, and looks amateurish. Gamaliel (talk) 22:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The listing shows the scope of the subject's work at a glance. However, even if you feel genre should be omitted, that does not address the issues with regards to employment history. Additionally, typically  is not included for non-graduates, and I don't see a reason not to identify prominently why Green Grow the Lilacs is considered significant. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:Metaviridae

message: Should this say it needs gag to encode capsid protein rather than env!?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Molitorppd22 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  env vs gag 

message: "Viruses of this family proliferate through intermediates called virus-like particles known for their ability to induce mutations and genome sequencing. "
You can't induce genome sequencing. That's a laboratory technique not a biological process. Maybe correct to "induce mutations, detectable by genome sequencing". Or just "induce mutations". 192.197.71.189 (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  inducing genome sequencing
Talk:The Open Organisation Of Lockpickers

message: I removed this section as it has nothing to do with TOOOL specifically, it belongs in the lockpicking article. Murderbike 21:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glorification/Myth 

message: Why not reinstate the Locksport article and make this a subheading? Presumably that is a far more valuable use of space. Redirection of traffic from the Locksport page to another that is about a specific group of the locksporting community seems rather odd. Arachnowhat (talk) 09:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locksport Redirection?
Category talk:Fugitives

message: I may be nitpicking, but Fugitives are not strictly a subset of :Category:Disappeared people, because:
* Disappeared people has "Category for people who went missing and whose subsequent fate remains a mystery."
* Fugitives has "This category is for individuals who are or were at large after fleeing from custody after an arrest, or are/were wanted for interrogation."
* The location and fate of some fugitives were well-known (the searching authorities knew but could not apprehend)
I suggest either:
* remove Fugitives from Category:Disappeared people;
* or, change Fugitives to "Fugitives whose subsequent fate remains a mystery";
* or, clarify both categories to make Fugitives fit the logic of Disappeared people.
84user (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappeared people?
Talk:Rous sarcoma virus

message: "(It lost the env gene normally seen in avian retroviruses during the recombination events that allowed it to acquire src)" is false. Prague C RSV- the standard strain has four genes, gag, pol, env and src. ref Dennis E. Schwartz, Richard Tizard and Walter Gilbert, Nucleotide sequence of rous sarcoma virus, Cell, Volume 32, Issue 3, 853-869, 1 March 1983
Peggy hopper (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Caulimoviridae

message: — Assignment last updated by Yp337 (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
Talk:Campo Alegre (brothel)

message: Isn't this article against WP guidelines? It is purely advertising page. Best, -195.212.29.185 (talk) 09:37, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising?

message: A source for updating the content of the article at a later date: Curaçao Opens Campo Alegre Brothel --John B123 (talk) 22:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra source
Talk:Birnaviridae

message: This seems like it is only focusing on the proteins produced by Birnaviridae. Before I expanded it, there was only very limited taxonomic info, and heavily detailed protein information. Should a separate article be created to house the protein information? Bervin61 (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the mention of a different virus with the same protein, I concur most of that section and the large protein infobox should be spun off to its own article. Ian (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much protein
Talk:Circoviridae

message: This incomplete fragment appears in the Taxonomy section. What was it supposed to say? Terrycojones (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by the linked abstract, it should say "similar." I have put this in, but feel free to change it if you know better than I. Bervin61 (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Their genomes are in length
Talk:History of the England national football team

message: recent history should be changed to this: have it so there is a paragraph called steve mcclaren and then another paragraph underneath with fabio capello and the present.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.55.157 (talk) 00:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent history 

message: I have just corrected the article's incorrect statement that no football was played in England during World War II (see :Category:Wartime football (soccer)), and provided information from Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation as a reference. Since the wartime and victory internationals were unofficial, it would possibly be better if the details of these matches were placed in separate articles with a shorter mention of them in this article. Coyets (talk) 11:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The category 'Wartime football (soccer)' has been moved to :Category:Wartime association football in line with a general Wikipedia naming improvement. Coyets (talk) 14:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wartime and victory internationals 

message: There seems to be a chunk missing. There's a paragraph that ends with the Second World War, then the next paragraph starts "Ramsey's prediction came true" and goes on to talk about 1966. The 1950s and early 1960s appear to be missing entirely, presumably covered in the missing paragraph that previously told us who Ramsey is and what he predicted. (I mean, I know what's being referred to, but that's not the point.) Brickie (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The section was removed by a vandal here and never restored. I've now done so.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 02:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where have the 1950s gone? 

message: I believe should have a section on its playing style as I believe there is enough analysis for it to be a subsection in the main article what are any elses thoughts.Dwanyewest (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing style of England 

message: This refers to the men's game.  It should either be titled 'Men's national team' and/or information added about the other national team
The Lionesses are one of two national teams. Women were actively excluded from the game from the 20s.
Several edits are called for. 2A00:23C5:E138:1A01:3C24:4D24:D235:ADE6 (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'National team' what happened to the women's national team
Talk:Robert Rosner

message: Note, this is not about the financial guy that was recently part of an AfD, but the astrophysicist, who is much more notable (director of a major government lab? I'd say that counts). --Whsitchy 02:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Another edit earlier, so I've reverted the stuff about that rich chap, to get it back to being about the astrophysicist, in keeping with the AFD discussion. --Oscarthecat 16:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: This page, what there is of it, has only been setup to prove a point - that this Robert Rosner is more notable than the other Robert Rosner. The point might be correct but that's not the issue. I'm therefore not entirely comfortable this page is here. Georgethe23rd 19:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't make it for that reason.  I only made it since A. the old page was deleted, and B. prevent recreation really.  Do a yahoo or google search, and could you please tell me what page you have to go on to find the financial guy if you only use Robert Rosner as the search text. Whsitchy 20:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to his profile at Argonne is dead, by the by.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfhortipfhy (talk • contribs) 14:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 
Talk:16th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: I've removed content for which the source's license (CC BY-NC-SA) renders it unusable on wikipedia. Ocalafla (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Caliciviridae

message: ...Why is there a picture of astroviruses here? Astroviruses are completely unrelated to caliciviruses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.172.28.188 (talk) 03:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

message: :The micrograph is of caliciviruses: astroviruses have a five-pointed star morphology. Graham Colm Talk 04:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, Here is the Hungarian Wikipedia article about this virus:
https://hu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calici_v%C3%ADrus
I was unable to add it on my phone, even after logging in. Please add it for me. (mobile wiki needs an edit button for languages...) --•ː• 3ICE •ː• 19:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungarian language available, please add it 
Talk:Human Error (House)

message: In the group of med students cuddy is taking around the hospital, one of them talks about botox injections then House says B+ then he says, send me your reseme. Just wondering is this one of the potential people in next season? andrewrox424 Bleep 11:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlikely. House said that they were first year med students.  --Emgee1129 (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group of students 
Talk:Adeyinka Oyekan

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Evelyn Barker

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: removed this from article:
This particular feeling of non-appreciation and betrayal was expressed by many British soldiers, sometimes defiantly publicly. Lieutenant-Colonel Richard Webb, after two of his soldiers were killed in October 1946, summoned a press-conference and leashed out against the Jews, calling them “a despicable race” and commenting on the body shapes of Jewish women. “These bloody Jews – we saved their skins in Alamein and other places and then they do this to us”, said Webb.Bethell (1979),  p. 280
--Sreifa (talk) 05:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  relevance? 
Talk:ATP International Series

message: I don't know whether the tournaments in a big unformatted lump just need adding to the table, or they shouldn't be here at all or what. Also which year is the table for, and which year are the purses for? it probably isn't worth listing all the prizes here, if there is a official site that does so, and can be linked to. Aviara 02:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup request
Talk:Togaviridae

message: It says, “Diseases associated with this family include: Alphaviruses: arthritis, encephalitis; Rubiviruses: congenital rubella syndrome.” I think the words “congenital rubella syndrome” should be shortened to just “rubella”; any rubella virus infection may cause rubella, but only those in pregnant women, or women about to get pregnant, will cause CRS. It will be understood that “rubella” also means, by extension, CRS.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clutter out