lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Asymmetrical tonic neck reflex

message: While I appreciate that the editor was trying to prevent stereotyping people with cerebral palsy by making the previous edit, I reverted because this article is referenced and the edit is not. Specifically, the reverted edit confuses the issue of whether only children with CP still exhibit ATNR or whether adults with CP do as well. This is a subtle but significant change in meaning. 
Since the only reference we have is one regarding children, it is unclear to me whether the information about adults is included in the reference — especially as I do not have a copy of the reference. If the previous editor (or anyone else) can supply a reference to clarify this, that would be most helpful. Twisted86 05:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted edits re: adult CP patients
Talk:Veronica Donovan

message: Due to Fox's terms of use and source information, the previous promotional picture has been replaced by a cropped television screenshot. If you seek to replace it with a promotional image, please specify its original source and copyright information. -- Ladida 14:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image

message: Hello, maybe this article should contain some spoiler warning because there certainly is at least one big spoiler in it. Thanks and regards. 212.190.93.60 14:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler Warning
Talk:Yosef Dayan

message: The article mentions his son as being "the outstanding soldier" ... this seems to violate NPOV. Colage 06:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His son was nominated to receive the "President Excellence Award" (:he:אות מצטיין הנשיא) which is given annualy to 120 exceptional soldiers. This an important award, so I believe outstanding is not really POV, like saying someone with a Nobel Prize is an important scientist is not POV. DGtal 11:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The pretender's page says that Dayan is a decendent of King David and a pretender to the throne of Israel.  Is this true?  If so, How was he able to trace his lineage almost three thousand years?  Emperor001 21:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are thousands of Jews that trace their roots to king David. Some are generally considered well based (including at least one Dayan family, I don't know if the same one, it's a common surname), some are less based (see also deletion discussion). There is not current proof that Dayan is more an active pretender than any of the others (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the Israeli throne). DGtal (talk) 16:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pretender

message: If the oral traditions are true being a descandant of King Jehoiachin, would bar him from the Judean throne.--24.57.60.200 (talk) 02:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim to a throne? 
Talk:Farmers Union Iced Coffee

message: Well this is from the other article. It seemed weird to have the articles "iced coffee" and "Iced coffee" link to completely different stories. Now this has a specific page and doesnt come under the broad term. This is in fact only one brand and doesnt encompass all interpretations of what iced coffee is around the world. -Jayzamann 06:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For archives sake let the records show that Jayzamann was incorrect with this post, "iced coffee" and the article of the Australian trademarked name "Iced Coffee" were at the time separate articles. Note the uppercase "C" in Coffee. So his perceived weirdness was probably a result of his misunderstanding of the article names 17:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Farmer's Union" is grammaticly incorrect. It would be a "Union of Farmer", which makes no sense.
"Farmers' Union" is grammaticly correct ("Union of Farmers"), however, it is not the trade mark.
The trademark is "Farmers Union" (i.e. No apostrophe at all.) Pdfpdf (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: - not a controversial move. Parsecboy (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: It seems to me that the article's discussion of Farmer's Union Iced Coffee will usually resemble an advertisement, given that the article does not discuss a generic product (iced coffee) nor a general brand alone (Farmer's Union or National Foods). Furthermore, the section addressing the advertisements actually used to promote this product in Australia demonstrates the "larrikin" culture surrounding this brand of Australian iced coffee. 
I query whether the article actually needs a rider disputing NPOV. To this end I propose the removal of the advert template transclusion. Slicer 12:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV / Advertisement Issue 
Talk:School bus crossing arm

message: Did You Know...
...that a School bus crossing arm is a safety device intended to protect children from being struck while crossing in front of a school bus by forcing them to step a distance ahead of the bus and into the driver's view?
: uh, duh?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.75.160 (talk) 02:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blurb for DYK

message: I see that a photo has been added to the article. That might cause someone to remove the photo request. NO! Please leave it in, because the current photo is not really adequate. What this article needs is a photo of the crossing arm in its extended position, and preferably from a high angle, which would show how it forces the children to be in the driver's sight. --Keeves 01:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: New hires photo taken from Commons, shows it extended. Photorequest tag removed. -130.194.13.105 05:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo, please
Talk:John Barlow (novelist)

message: Least anyone think this is self-promotional, let me say that I wrote up the page having read and enjoyed one of the guy's books, and have no other connection with him.  He's only published a couple of books, but he has a distinctive voice and I suspect we'll hear more of him, so I reckon he is notable.  seglea 07:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Capacity

message: I put links to an ITIL glossary in Availability and Business Relationship Management since these pages are targeted by links from the main ITIL article but they do not provide the ITIL definition-context in any of their text.  I noted I have the link in the correct place on the Capacity page, my bad for not knowing your Quality of Workmanship that is expected.  Honestly, though, the ITIL specific context needs to be referenced.  The best definitions, the most comprehensive, are at the link which remains in this article.  The ideal situation would be to have the glossary come up when an ITIL specific context is desired.  Is there any way to shorten the process and just include their text, with their knowledge and blessings of course.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.63.133.8 (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This disambiguation page had a cleanup note, so I cleaned up per WP:DAB, which says "Lists of articles of which the disambiguated term forms only a part of the article title don't belong here. Disambiguation pages are not search indices. Do not add links that merely contain part of the page title (where there is no significant risk of confusion)."
This would also mean that almost all terms on the disambiguation page should be listed under "See also", because none of them seem to be used as the standalone word capacity on their article's page. I am unsure in how far descriptions should be used in the "See also" section, so I deleted the descriptions but still list them with the descriptions here. So if someone thinks the descriptions should really be included, just copy-paste it back.
*Capacitor
*Absorptive capacity
*Analytic capacity, a mathematical function
*Carrying capacity, in ecology, the ability of an environment to sustain a particular species
*Channel capacity
*Color rendering capacity, in photometry, a measure of how broad a color space can be perceived under the illumination of a specific light
*Cranial capacity, a measure of the volume of the interior of the skull
*Diffusion capacity
*Heat capacity, also called "thermal capacity", the ability of matter to store heat
*Seating capacity
*Toxic capacity, the ability of an organism, organic system or ecosystem to sustain introduction of a toxin
*Evolving capacities, a concept in which the direction or guidance of a child by any adult must take into account the capacities of the child to exercise rights on his or her own behalf
*Capacity utilization, the relationship of actual to potential output of industries in economics
– sgeureka t•c 21:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Bruno of Augsburg

message: I think the reference to Agatha should be taken out, or at least modified to show the questionable status.  In Wikipedia alone i found two other possible parents for the mother of St. Margaret; a Google search showed me two more possibilities in five minutes.  Without a reference here to back it up it seems to be rather pushy to even mention it.  Lindsay H. 07:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Agatha
Talk:Duncan Brannan

message: Apparently, he appeared in one of the pre-recorded show videos played on the TV's at Chuck E Cheese:  "Closing Time? - Want to know what a CEC manager does after the store closes? Well now you do! Watch Duncan Brennan run around CEC playing games, watching the show, and eat pizza!" --24.23.84.46 07:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dayereh

message: In Uzbekistan, I believe the doira can also be made from horse skin.  Badagnani 23:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse skin 
Talk:Murara

message: I've replaced the infobox inserted by Plinth molecular gathered with the template used on Mount Nyiragongo because the information was not being displayed clearly.  "Coordinates" were appearing twice, the first time partly overwriting "Elevation".  There is a similar problem with the infobox on Mount Nyamuragira but I've not had time to rectify that yet. Kahuzi 08:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the infobox from Mount Nyamuragira, where it looked just fine. I have no idea what sort of interaction caused the problem. Thanks to Kahuzi for fixing it. Now I know what the correct infobox to use is. Plinth molecular gathered 20:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:UFC 42

message: Just rewatched the original broadcast and it was announced as a split decision (28-29, 29-28, 29-28) but is listed as unanimous (29-28) on UFC.com, Sherdog, Fight Metric and The Underground. Perhaps an error in the in-ring announcement that was corrected after? Xxovercastxx (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ludwig v Sudo
Talk:UFC 49

message: Should there be a reference to the fact that the Liddell/White bout appears in the film Pineapple express during a phone booth call with the lead character and his girlfriend? It can be seen in the background on a TV in the motel room.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foreverinsane (talk • contribs) 17:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appears in 'Pineapple Express'
Talk:ABEC scale

message: I have noticed two contradictions in the paragraphs of this article.
In the first paragraph, it says that higher ABEC rating "contribute to higher speed capability. However, the ABEC rating does not specify many other critical factors, such as smoothness of the rolling"
Then in the third paragraph, there is a statement: "High ABEC rated bearings allow optimal performance of critical applications requiring very high RPM and smooth operation. High ABEC rated bearings do not make equipment go faster however"
The contradictions being that in paragraph 1 it is stated that higher ABEC rating results in higher speed capability, then in paragraph 3, it is stated that high ABEC ratings do not make equipment go faster. Also in paragraph 1, it is stated that ABEC rating does not specify smoothness, then in paragraph 3, it is stated that high ABEC bearings are used in applications requiring smooth rolling.
Hope this is helpful,
Sorry if I have misunderstood the information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.191.245 (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Those statements aren't in contradiction, but I've copyedited the article to try and make it less confusion. Let me know if it didn't work. Wizard191 (talk) 22:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Yup, I sure did: . The difference in rolling forces between an ABEC 1 and 9 are negligible, that's why there's isn't a noticeable different. Wizard191 (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions in paragraphs 

message: In the first section of the article it states there's 5 ratings, up to 9. But the  other two sections list abec 11 now. I checked the sources which say nothing about abec 11. Also the first link leads nowhere. Should I or someone else edit it out?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.22.208.147 (talk) 22:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I recommend sticking with the norm. It seems ABEC 9 is the name of the game, nothing about 10, 11, 12 or even 13. This (in German) very useful guide on ball bearings also mentions the ISO-levels, which are related to ABEC scale: https://www.schleer.de/downloads/01allgemeines.pdf on p.22. Additionally, ISO 492 is currently in (after five years) review, Stage 40.00, see https://www.iso.org/standard/80376.html so maybe it will mention new scales, but I doubt it from a gut feeling. It is also worth noting (see schleer PDF) that different tolerance-classes etc. exist for different bearings. Mech Engineers in the field would be able to tell precisely what is what and who is who, but for skateboards, scooters, etc. ABEC would be also just an entrace-point to buying some new bearings which fit the specific dimensions (format, size).--17387349L8764 (talk) 09:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abec 11... Again?
Talk:Portugal during World War I

message: Any particular reason for the use of Great War in the title over World War I? It does, after all, redirect. Polymathematics 03:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the name Great War. JacquesNguyen (talk) 22:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: "Despite having an old alliance with Britain dating back to the Treaty of Windsor in 1386 (the oldest alliance in the world, which is still in force).. " ok i tried to edit this section of the article but it was reverted i think that this so called alliance is of no relevance since  britain for instance broke said alliance with an ultimatum to portugal in 1890 before the war because of the so called Pink Map in africa also every country had alliances and broke alliances and so on... i cant understand the relevance of this particular alliance. Even more given the fact that it was broken by england several times. and when it says "which is still in force" is even laughable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.92.65.62 (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-portuguese alliance 

message: The entry for 1916 included "Only the first two divisions reach France, since the shipping of American troops drastically reduces the transportation capacity of the Allies."  
This made no sense.  The USA was not at war until April 1917, and began shipping troops even later.  Probably related to 1918.  Should have a source.  GwydionM (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport of troops
Talk:Hythe, Alberta

message: The map for Hythe, Alberta, is incorrect.  The places of Hythe and Grande Prairie appear to be transposed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.59.170.45 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 22 August 2006
:GP seems correctly located, but the Hythe star is where Fox Creek, Alberta should be.--Qyd 12:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Analytic expression

message: Analytical expression or Analytic expression ?
Which one is correct ?
--Gtdj 08:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say: either. They are complete synonyms. Any preference is a matter of personal taste. --LambiamTalk 09:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, analytical expression is more popular than analytic expression, so I will redirect analytic expression to analytical expression and change the context.Gtdj 14:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Analytical expression or Analytic expression?
Talk:M-554 (Michigan highway)

message: I've updated this with the suggested ideas for the infobox on a decommissioned designation. Just needs a map... Imzadi1979 08:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Although this route is less than a mile, the RD could still use expansion. It's not B-class yet - CL — 05:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was expanded recently and reassessed back to B-class. Now it's been been bumped back to C. I think that editor is mistaken in that action. It is afterall less than a mile and only existed for 7 years without any other changes. Imzadi1979 (talk) 23:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this article now meets B-class criteria. Perhaps Splat wasn't considering the factors in the assessment; the route is quite short and it's decommissioned. Reassessment granted :) CL — 02:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Not really sure about the notability of this one. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA audit 

message: In order to expand out the M-553 article, I merged this one over to it. Now the result it about to be sent to ACR. Imzadi 1979 →  21:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Levomethadyl acetate

message: Are Levomethadyl acetate and Levacetylmethadol the same chemical? Anxietycello (talk) 19:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they are. "Levacetylmethadol" is the International Nonproprietary Name, whereas "levomethadyl acetate" is the United States Adopted Name. per WP:MEDMOS, the former is preferred, and this article should be merged into Levacetylmethadol. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Robert Altman (photographer)

message: Following email discussion with Robert, and discussion on Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems, we need to remove all photos by Robert. Originally he was happy for images to be used on wikipedia, heowever this meant that they would need to be released under  which is too permisive for him. It may be possible to include some photos under fair use here, provided there is some commentary. 
Altmans photos are:
*:Image:Janis-Joplin.jpeg
*:Image:Ken kesey.jpg
*:Image:Anti-War Demonstration San Francisco, CA 1970 by Robert Altman.jpg
*:Image:Phil ochs.jpeg
*:Image:Robert.anton.wilson.jpeg
*:Image:Tim leary.jpeg
*:Image:Keith richards portrait.jpg
*:Image:Julian beck.jpeg
*:Image:Bill graham.jpg
*:Image:Chet helms.jpg
*:Image:Ronnie spector 04.jpg
*:Image:Marty balin.jpg
*:Image:Flower child 67.jpeg
*:Image:Cockettes altman.jpg
*:Image:AbbieHoffman1.jpeg
*:Image:Stew albert.jpg
*:Image:Holding Together, Mt. Tamalpais, California, 1968 by Robert Altman.jpg
*:Image:Dancing Hippies, Berkeley, California by Robert Altman.jpg - on commons
*:Image:How do! Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 1967 by Robert Altman.jpg - on commons
--Salix alba (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Robert requested the removal of these photos of himself.
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August 30, 2007, DSCN3126.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3130.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3135.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3165.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3176.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3177.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3199.JPG|
Image:Robert Altman at The Plant, August_30, 2007, DSCN3174.JPG|  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.86.46 (talk) 08:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos of Robert Altman (Gallery)

message: all external links were removed. while no reason was given, there is a very real possibility that the links were to sites that robert altman may not have given permission to post his photos to (even though they give copyright notice on the pages). to be safe, i returned only the link to his official site, which should be enough, and acceptable, for this article. if someone removes this link, i would appreciate it being discussed or explained here, in addition to any reasons for the other link removals (even if the other links are acceptable under WP guidelines, they were probably excessive, but we still need to say why we do things. i know i often forget to explain minor edits, which i will try to fix in future.)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Battle of Wuzhang Plains

message: It seems that much of the information in this article comes from "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" rather than any sort of reliable historical document. Someone should carefully fact check the article and perhaps make citations.
:Can you list where you think there is stuff from the novel? Because when I wrote this article up, I referred only to Sanguo Zhi. _dk 08:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: according to Wei Yan article, he didn't resisted arrest, he was framed. he may even have command of the army. anyway, it doesn't make sense how the rearguard can suddenly overtake the main body and attempt to break to the wooden pathway. the wooden pathway breaking reminds me of liubang. Shu couldn't do what Xiangyu did in that position neither, the enemy was not in striking distance, so you couldn't rob his supplies after defeating him as it would take too long and you won't last, what is Wei Yan suppose to do in the middle of nowhere without a source of supplies anyway? i always thought SanguoZhi is slightly bias on Shu personal because Shu didn't have an official log so most of it was based on memory. however there is really no better offical source that that, it is kinda like "the bible and jesus". but could you just post the source as proof so people don't question it is from the "novel" Akinkhoo (talk) 05:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Factuality dispute

message: Does anybody else think that "Battle at the Wuzhang Plains" sounds better? --Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 16:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. "Of" is standard. _dk (talk) 22:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle at the Wuzhang Plains
Talk:Wonder Boy 3: Monster Lair

message: HEY every one! An article was made for this game already, located Wonder Boy III: Monster Lair. I made it, back in April, when I was user:Marceline_Desbo. I chose roman numerals because that is how it is printed on the videogame package I own. That article is a bit longer and belongs to a decent amount of categories. It is linked to by the category thing at the bottom of the article for Wonder Boy the videogame series.
This article, however, has been linked to a bit in that same article.
I guess they should be mergeddd!? Woodenbeam 09:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicate article