Talk:The Edge Chronicles

message: Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy series (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain.  This series would probably qualify.  Anyone care to add it? Tamtrible (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone familiar with this series care to add it to this list? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Edge Chronicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060825023702/http://www.skypirates.ru/english/skypirates_eng.htm to http://skypirates.ru/english/skypirates_eng.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think the no-reference articles about the books in this series should be merged into this article. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: While some of those titles are likely notable, I would support this merger. An interested editor could always reverse adding in citations to RS to help establish notability at a later date. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

text: I concur. While the books are likely notable, improving them as a branch of this article and then spinning them off into their own article when ready sounds like a better procedure than attempting to individually improve all the articles in a large book series. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

text: Actually please could editors ensure that the content is cited and plot summaries are condensed before placing them here. They are best worked on individually. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

text: Quick query, does being UK Children's Laureate mean that Chris Riddell qualifies under clause 5. If this isn't a case of clause 5 I'm not sure what is? El komodos drago (talk to me) 07:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think that clause 5 applies, as historical significance is required. UK Children's Laureate (a national prize) establishes his notability, certainly, but doesn't put him in the league of Charles Dickens, for whom historical significance is clear by the passage of time. I therefore support the merges. Klbrain (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  But are there any works of Dickins which are not covered by clause 1 (i.e. are covered by 2 or more IRSs in a non-trial manner)? Clause 5 obviously has to cover some works clause 1 doesn't or it wouldn't exist. El komodos drago (talk to me) 12:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Small amendment here: where there are trilogy pages, then a merge to the series seems more appropriate; so, merging to The Edge Chronicles Twig Saga and The Edge Chronicles: Rook Barkwater Saga, as appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 04:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of individual articles of books in this series 

message: I conducted a reassessment on behalf of the Children's literature WikiProject as requested by . Specifically asked about were the multiple improvement tags and whether being Children's Laureate was an example of something which would qualify notability under NBOOK criteria 5.Through this reassessment I have raised the article from Start to C class and removed many of the improvement tags. First all of these should likely not have been placed as there was some degree of duplication between them. Beyond that the sources have been improved but are still somewhat lacking and over reliant on primary/SELFPUB sources. As for the Children's Laureate question my examination suggests it's not such an award. For it to be such an award I would expect substantial coverage throughout the United Kingdom, children's literature news sites, and at least passing coverage in the popular press in other countries. While I did find regular coverage in the UK and some coverage in children's literature new sites (particularly Publisher's Weekly) both these fell short, as did coverage in popular press in other countries (e.g. New York Times which mentioned it while covering Blake but not on its own merits). However in reality no one editor can make this kind of determination. An RfC can give weight to community opinion but it'll be the opinion of editors are AfD discussions who really decide the matter. I hope this helps. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 13:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: The redirect Goom (The Edge Chronicles) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Goom (The Edge Chronicles)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Spiker (The Edge Chronicles) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Spiker (The Edge Chronicles)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Mugbutt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mugbutt]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Hubble the Banderbear has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Hubble the Banderbear]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Mother Horsefeather has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mother Horsefeather]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Screed Toe-Taker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Screed Toe-Taker]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Screed Toe-taker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Screed Toe-taker]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Screedius Tollinix has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Screedius Tollinix]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Slyvo Spleethe has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Slyvo Spleethe]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Thaw Daggerslash has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Thaw Daggerslash]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]