Talk:Moral Orel

message: Rumors have been circulating that this series will not be released onto season box sets. Any official statements?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.95.225.49 (talk) 02:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 2 and 3 DVD

message: I removed a parenthetical statement refering to the Catholic Church as the "Original Church form which Protestants broke away", as this statement is a gross oversimplification of Christian History (for example Greek Orthodox Christians see themselves as the original church from which the Catholic Church broke away). The statement also has nothing to do with the show.
:The Roman Catholic Church is indeed the oldest surviving Christian denomination, but it is the result of consolidating earlier local organizations. (Prior to the creation of the Roman Church proper in 314, what are now called Dioceses were equivalent to denominations, except that they were purely geographic and not based on doctrinary disagreement.) Furthermore, the Diocese of Rome predates the universalized Roman Church as a single organization and was founded by the Disciple Simon Peter, which explains how he is listed as the 1st Pope. 
:In any case, you're right that it isn't relevant to the Article. Thanks for removing it! The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic Church

message: OK, I've seen that episode twice, and I'm still don't get it. Is it supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek social commentary or what? I cannot understand why Cartoon Network chose to hype this show. The promo gave me mixed signals: superficially it resembled a typical syrupy Christmas cartoon, yet I wondered if it was in fact some off-color parody of "Davey & Goliath". What I ended up seeing was this nauseatingly cheerful and deluded young "true believer" who thinks his hyperactive kid brother is Jesus, yet is oblivious to the complete meltdown of his nuclear family. Maybe I'm just being cynical, or maybe that was really the intent of the show to feel that way.
Akira625 22:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did I miss something? 

message: Why is this entry in the form of personal opinion about the show's standpoint? It should be unbiased, which it seems to have some bias.
The author apparently thought it appropriate to use this article to demonstrate his political views. Right or wrong, they do not belong in the entry. Also, please sign your commments. --Orion Minor 09:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the above paragraph could be rephrased to say that since there is no one agreed-upon way to be a Christian, then please don't edit the article and make claims that the townspeople are being good Christians or bad Christians or anything to that effect unless you also make a counterargument on this discussion page as to why such an edit isn't original research and merely an opinion.97.83.104.146 (talk) 22:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias or Unbias? 

message: Seriously's, this show is going to end up like The Book of Daniel (television), if no one defends it. Sweetfreek 01:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this show will attract nearly the controversy that show has.  This is being aired on cable very late at night.  It's on a programming block that is typically ignored by anybody who isn't interested in adult-oriented animation.  It's presented as comedy rather than a serious attempt at presenting Christianity in a different light.  Whereas The Book of Daniel directly portrayed religious icons in a light that offended some, Moral Orel only portrays the followers of those icons (more specifically, the extremist followers) as being incredibly flawed. In any event, there wasn't much of a mainstream controversy over the portrayal of Jesus in South Park (or, for that matter, the portrayal of Satan in the same series). Jeff Silvers 01:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...AND BEWARE THE THEOCONS!! 

message: I'm the one who's been adding these little summaries to the article (I've done 2 so far). I hope this is OK with everyone. I think if everyone likes them, they would probably look better in their own section, but I don't really know how to do that. I haven't done much editing besides little grammar corrections on various articles. I'm not registered here yet, but if I start contributing more I suppose I will create an account.
EDIT: I finally registered! Your new Moral Orel Episode Summary Writer is: awesom-o 05:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Registering is an excellent idea, particularly if you're going to edit a section of the site on a regular basis.  As a registered user you can put Moral Orel on your watchlist, and you can sign the discussion page any time you make major changes.  Incidentally your summaries are a lot more interesting than the show itself.  It's possibly the worst thing on adult swim to date, but peversely it's so bad I looked it up to find out more about it. BronzeWarrior 08:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I organized the episode summaries, I hope you don't mind. Anyway, IMO, I think the show is pretty funny. :) Yono 19:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Summaries

message: "The globe shown in the opening credits is missing most of the North American continent, with the exception of the United States, and the entire South American continent."
Could we rephrase this so it makes sense? Does this mean that the globe only shows the United States of America in the Western Hemisphere?
In short, yes. Canada, Mexico, South America - all completely missing. The Eastern half of the world is intact, though. I just couldn't think of a better way to phrase it. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 06:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "The globe shown in the opening credits is missing the entire Western Hemisphere, with the exception of the United States."
I take it that the creators of the series were trying to imply that the United States is somehow more important than the rest of the Hemisphere, or perhaps the entire world? At least that the sterotypical Christian thinks this? Captain Jackson 22:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Americas 

message: I thought I was the only one who noticed that. But should this be considered "religious animation?" That would be like classifying Police Squad! under "crime dramas."
:Agreed. SelfStudyBuddy 05:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious animation? 

message: I'm in favor of making it a separate article, if a full second season appears. Replace the whole guide with a bulleted list of the episodes and original airdates. --SidP 02:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode guide as its own article 

message: I believe the episode "Courtship" had music other than mark rivers if anyone canfirm this a note should be added to the music section. SelfStudyBuddy 05:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a little research and I was right "Peter Blood"  was featured his track you was used through out the episode. --SelfStudyBuddy 22:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: There is not one citation needed flag in this entire article, until there is citation needed flags, I am removing the original research or unverified claims tag. --SelfStudyBuddy 01:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research or unverified claims 

message: I think there should be an article on Coach Stopframe, placed in the Supporting Characters section. However, I hardly think I could write a full article, as I have limited knowledge. Could someone with more knowledge of him than I write an article? Sakurato (talk) 03:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danielle Stopframe....No article 

message: There is currently a character list at Characters for Moral Orel. This is a non-standard and ungrammatical name. A character list should be at List of Moral Orel characters. There was previously a list at that title but it was apparently unilaterally redirected without discussion. The new characters article can't be moved to the correct title because of the old list/redirect. Suggested solutions would be: 1) delete the redirect and move the current list to its place; 2) undo the redirect and delete the current list; 3) do nothing about the current redirect and delete the current list. While neither character list is referenced, the redirected list is at least grammatically written. I'm not a fan so I have no strong interest but my preferred solution would be 2, restore the old list and delete the current one. What say ye? Otto4711 (talk) 22:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list 

message: It's like someone took the completely appropriate character summaries and added tibits of grammatical errors and things that don't fit.
Example:  Also, he uses his mother wraped up "lost commandments" to teach Orel when he does something wrong. Her death really messes Clay up badly. If she was alive and see him as an alcoholic, she'll probably be disappointing in him.
::They did. Have a look through the history of the page. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a clean up pretty bad. 

message: the current article says "It is possible that "Lunchbox" is a nickname or genital-related euphemism."  This isn't really a verifiable statement.  It's more likely that the name 'Lunchbox' is a continuation of the stop-motion related names (i.e. Puppington, Modella, Posabule, Stopframe).  The Lunchbox is a stop-motion tool used for getting instant video feedback for animation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonelvisamerica (talk • contribs) 09:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lunchbox Hymentact

message: Can someone please go through the references and try and fix the "Check |url= scheme" errors which appears at least Six times. Not sure what is causing this and I don't want to even try and do it myself because I'm afraid I'll make it worse. Thanks. YborCityJohn (talk) 22:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Issues of Errors Appearing in References 

message: Under Reverend Putty's paragraph it describes his daughter Stephanie as a "Punk Rock Lesbian" I don't think Stephanie's sexual preference has ever been established. But if I were to guess I'd say she's probably Bi-Sexual so I would like to take the Lesbian reference out until there is some concrete evidence and references that establish her sexuality. YborCityJohn (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephanie's Sexuality (i.e. Lesbianism) 

message: WASPs are a cultural elite. The show's characters are decidedly middle America middle class.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.196.218.1 (talk) 22:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WASP? 

message: Is this correct? to download episodes on ITunes it's $47.96 and on the Playstation PSP it's $87.65 because that's waaaay a lot more for the same exact episodes. Can you please explain this further. 67.218.39.22 (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home releases 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Moral Orel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090414124532/http://www.creators.com/opinion/brent-bozell/shower-after-adult-swim.html to http://www.creators.com/opinion/brent-bozell/shower-after-adult-swim.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: I believe there should be a section talking about the retrospect reception of Moral Orel, as the show has received a massive cult following in 2022. 78.19.202.157 (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moral Orel's Resurgence 

message: Please change it back it’s not canon and unconstructive Texdraws (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoever edited the page to say that Orel is doughy’s boyfriend