lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deobandi movement

message: please, read this article once. Owais Al Qarni (talk) 17:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2020 

message: Islamic State was a flowering of Deobandi thinking. Should this not be mentioned? Rustygecko (talk) 23:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic State 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 07:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Deobandi →  – Similar reasons listed at Talk:Barelvi movement#Requested move 8 December 2022 by . The titles should be consistent. ─ The Aafī (talk) 03:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Support: Yep, I agree. Titles should be concise, but not to the point of being grammatically incoherent. 'Deobandi' is either the word for one follower of the movement or an adjectival descriptor for the movement - and neither of those are appropriate standalone terms for the article title. 'Deobandism' is an alternative, but the proposed title is more prevalent . Iskandar323 (talk) 06:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 December 2022
Talk:2002 Winter Olympics

message: (moved from Talk:2002 Winter Olympic Games)
This was removed as being "US-centered":
:A feature of this Olympics has been the emergence of the so-called "extreme" sports, such as snowboarding, moguls and aerials, which appeared in previous Olympics but have captured public attention this year as never before. 
I restored it.  It seems true to me that these sports, which are relatively new to the Olympics, are receiving more attention than they did four years ago.  (I'm not particularly a fan of these sports; it just seems to me that it's an appropriate observation.) If someone could explain why this is a "US-centered" remark, please do. -- User:RjLesch
: I don't know about it being US-centric, but how has it captured the public's attention as never before?--branko
::More people participate in these sports than before--particularly snowboarding. Funnyhat 22:26, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Extreme sports US-centered?

message: The Utah Alcohol Laws section is written as if someone is clearly opposed to the laws in Utah. This shouldn't sound biased. - 144.35.240.140 (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased Speech
Talk:Kalat, Balochistan

message: Is this a cognate of the Spanish placename Alcalá?
--80.58.1.45 08:35, 15 April 2005
:No.  This is from Persian.  There is an arabic word qalat or kalat (other variations) meaning fortress that may be a cognate of the  Spanish placename Alcalá, I don't know.  See for example its use in the name of Nimrod Fortress or Kalat al-Subeiba. --Bejnar 19:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcalá 

message: Since this is a article about the town, and not the district or the Khanate, shouldn't the material in the History section be about the town?  Isn't all of this about the Khanate better put in the Kalat (princely state) article, with a simple link from here? --Bejnar 19:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I understand that some of the architecture from the Khanate period is quite beautiful.  Does any editor in Kalat have a camera? --Bejnar 19:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture
Talk:Bacteriology

message: The page as it stands is a Wiktionary entry, which already exists.  I'm reverting it to being a
redirect to Microbiology.   There is nothing here that's not already in one of those two pages.  Jmeppley 16:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to microbiology 

message: Because there is a clear distinction between bacteriology and microbiology, I think I will make it its own page. LittleT889 (talk) 18:53, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created own page 

message: English 106.208.23.145 (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Loonie

message: Adding pictures of each commemorative coin would be a good addition to this article, similar to the Canadian Quarter article.  SquashEngineer (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: it's so small, and despite how great he is, his loonie specifically might not be notable enough to be given its own section. 
If there is a lot more information, then do add. Otherwise, I think we should remove it. 
Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terry Fox loonie section
Talk:Ho Chi Minh City

message: Within etymology is this section: "However, there is a technical difference between the two terms: Sài Gòn is commonly used to refer to the city centre in District 1 and the adjacent areas, while Ho Chi Minh City refers to all of its urban and rural districts."  I've lived here for 18 years and have never experienced Saigon being used to only refer to central districts.  Saigon and HCMC are certainly interchangeable terms for the city as a whole, but not certain areas of it.  Are there any more reliable sources for this? John arneVN (talk) 04:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As a saigonese born and bred you are correct 2001:EE0:263:2408:34FD:16E7:D449:D279 (talk) 07:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saigon used for central districts? 

message: Is the number for GRP correct and also what is its unit? Aminabzz (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRP
Talk:List of elements by name

message: This has the makings of a featured list.  Just needs references and tidying up a bit. -- ALoan (Talk) 18:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FLC]]?

message: Would it be too much to ask to have the elements listed by magnetic ordering?
70.69.206.62 18:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  By Magnetic ordering 

message: The table is very ugly! It's supposed to be a table, but that impression is deeply disturbed by the colors that gives the impression of lots of small subsequent tables. Something must be done immediatelly, or else horrible catastrophes will occur randomly, such as entire nations being hypnotized and stuck in front of the computer screen! Rursus 08:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decidedly {{User:Rursus/Scream|Häßlich! Urrrk!!}} 

message: Is there a way to change the template for categories of elements seen at the top and the bottom of the list? I looked in the code for the page but couldn't find anything. Strictly it should be mentioned that the element categories are at standard conditions, since the metal/non-metal boundary changes with pressure etc. Joldy (talk) 00:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Element categories 

message: why not have it by atomic number?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.228.172 (talk) 10:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why not? 

message: I have added Ununseptium to the table since it was not there before; if I have made a mistake please correct it but DO NOT delete it because it is pointless to leave out a whole element, never mind place a picture of one of the most up-to-date periodic tables which clearly shows that Uus (Ununseptium) clearly exists.  Wikisaver62 (talk) 16:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ununseptium
Talk:Cognitive psychology

message: Cognition: (People Think)
• cognito = "to know"
• co = "together"
• gnoscere = "know 192.145.168.43 (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognition 

message: — Assignment last updated by Roach Jefferson (talk) 23:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writ 2 - Academic Writing
Talk:The Birth of a Nation

message: has repeatedly added substantial content about the KKK to the lead of the article. The purpose of the lead is to provide a concise overview of the article's content and summarise the film's notability. While the The Birth of a Nation did bolster KKK recruitment, that is only a small part of the film's notability. The film's place in history owes more to how it shaped the film industry, and that should be the primary focus of the lead. The content that has been added is overly detailed and disproportionate. Moreover, as MOS:LEAD points out, the lead should not contain material that is not already included in the main body of the article because it is supposed to be a summary. I note Kanefo is a newly registered editor, but if this disruption continues then we will have to consider some kind of sanction. Betty Logan (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to the lead by Kanefo 

message: I removed the "Accolades" subsection on the grounds that its only cited source explicitly states that the relevant "accolade" is in fact not an endorsement. This was reverted with the note that "inclusion in the library of congress is an honor," a statement which is directly contradicted by an official statement from the Library in the cited article.
I'm taking this to the talk page to avoid revert warring, but I simply don't see how a section consisting of an uncited statement and a statement that contradicts its own citation adds anything of value to the article. Ambisinistral (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a misreading of the sources, which indicate the film is historically very important.  Rjensen (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

text: An "accolade" isn't necessarily an "endorsement", it can be any type of meritorious acknowledgement, which being selected for preservation in the National Film Registry clearly is. I recall in the distant past that this section of film articles was renamed to "Accolades" from "Awards and honors" precisely for this reason. Look through the film articles you will see that it is common for NFR nominations to be listed under "Accolades". In any case, the section also includes the AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies, which certainly ranks as an achievement and you clearly shouldn't have deleted this. Your edit appeared to advance your personal point of view, and was rightly reverted IMO. Betty Logan (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Nobody-least of all me-is saying it's not morally repugnant, but it is still universally recognized as a cinematic milestone. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Accolades" subsection is nonsensical
Talk:Rabbit

message: Request to change:
"=== Domestication ===
Main article: Domestic rabbit
Rabbits have long been domesticated"
to 
"=== Commercial Use and Livestock ===
Main article about domestication: Domestic rabbit
Rabbits have long been used for commercial purposes and as livestock.."
Justification: The text underneath the title doesn't discuss domestication, rather it describes commercial use and livestock. Smalletter (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "domestication" here includes for reasons such as producing meat or fur, not just taming a house pet. The article at Domestic rabbit also covers those things.   signed, Willondon (talk)  16:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: There is a grammatical error in this section that I would like to correct. Julietta Swift (talk) 08:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musculature 

message: There is a pop culture reference here that I think is worth mentioning. The South Sydney rugby league team, the Rabbitohs, is not named after rabbits (although that is unavoidably their symbol), but the people who sold hunted rabbits in the street in the afternoon during the Depression, who called "rabbit-oh" for anyone who may have been looking for cheap meat for dinner. Julietta Swift (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  As food...
Talk:Frauenburg

message: Should this be a disambiguation page??JHK
: Not really! It has more in common with nationalistic blabber than a disambiguation page. Admin, please delete. Matcreg 14:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Matcreg wants to completely delete Frauenburg from Wikipedia to serve his national POV on Nicolaus Copernicus. There he altered even a quote from a German book to match his intentions. --Matthead 14:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion?
Talk:Philadelphia Experiment

message: I believe that the whole Philadelphia Project story is confabulated from real war time research that would have made ships sitting on the horizon relative to another ship very difficult to see. Please see the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffused_lighting_camouflage. 
This research was abandoned because high resolution radar was developed within a short period of time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.19.179 (talk) 22:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds a lot like original research, but if you can find a reliable source to support your claim you're more than welcome to add it. SadBlueRobot (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an educational TV documentary on this. It confirms with photos, films, and interviews with people involved that it was a, now declassified, secret counter luminescence experiment that went wrong. The counter luminence lights overloaded the ship's electrical system and caused a fire producing acrid, toxic smoke from burning insulation and metal. There were no deaths but several smoke inhalation casualties. The ship returned to port and experiments scheduled with that equipment were canceled at that time.
98.164.67.198 (talk) 07:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I find this interesting because when I saw this movie and had really enjoyed it, I was telling my father - who had worked in Canadian Naval R&D at Ste Hyacinthe during WWII - all about the plot, and his comment was "Yeah. That's basically what happened".  This man was not a fantasist or a conspiracy theorist, so leaves me to wonder even more. CybercroneCA (talk) 02:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Your father sounds like a man with a dry humor or like someone who likes tall tales, but Wikipedia articles are based on reliable sources, not on hearsay from random people on the internet. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counter Illuminance 

message: I've found a short story from 1942 that might be the origin or at least the inspiration for this story. 'The Phantom Armada' written by Stanton A. Coblentz (Possibly a pseudonym), published in Fantastic Adventures features the US Navy deploying an experimental 'invisibility smokescreen' in 1982 whose effects turn out to be a little longer lasting than the inventor intended. 58.175.90.122 (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible fictional inspration 

message: In the first paragraph of the Origins there's a list of numbers that are presumably references but they have no hypertext. 62.49.216.195 (talk) 13:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean "27–29, 35, 65, 80, 102, 115, 163–165" - those are page numbers. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with ref citations.
Talk:Moor

message: I unredirected this page because it was directing to Moors.  I had linked to it from The Hound of the Baskervilles in which the moorlands are discussed. I know this is just a stub, but there should be more here, discussing the English moors perhaps? -- Zoe
This is supposed to be a disambiguation page. The inclusion of a long paragraph on the Moors better fits with that article. Sayeth 19:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fatboy Slim

message: > In 2008, Cook formed the Brighton Port Authority with David Byrne.
I think this is slightly misleading, as it implies BPA is a collaborative effort between the two of them, when Byrne only featured on one song. I think it might be more reasonable to describe it as 
> In 2008, Cook formed the Brighton Port Authority, collaborative effort with a number of other famous artists including David Byrne.
QwertyFinger (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading heading info about BPA? 

message: Under aliases this line:
"It was reported in 2008 that he held the Guinness World Record for the most Top 40 hits under different names.[5] The following is a list of lesser-known aliases used by Cook in performances."
This is a common claim in online information about Cook. However, no such record exists according to the official Guinness site.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:1324:2D00:6D73:ED88:F58A:17A5 (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim he holds a Guinness Record that does not exist 

message: There is no mention of Here Lies Love on the Fatboy Slim Wikipedia page?  That is an oversight for sure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_Lies_Love Beatrix Pothead (talk) 23:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here Lies Love 

message: It describes Cook as the bassist for the Housemartins, who are then said to have had a number one hit with an a capella song.  Doesn't that mean Cook was not involved with that single, assuming he was not also a vocalist in the band?  It's an odd thing to mention if it was one of the only songs they recorded that he didn't play on. SlackerInc1 (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Housemartins section 

message: Aliases redirects to section that contains no information 31.125.72.187 (talk) 11:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the list was  due to lack of source, however the reference in the infobox stating "Also known as: See Aliases" wasn't. I'm guessing this was probably an error. StarkRG (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aliases 

message: The piece says he's a 12% shareholder- ref 50 link is broken but the 2009 version from wayback machine does not mention shareholding? And the last published accounts (Mar-2023) list one person (A Cook) having >90% of the shares in the club: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00081077/filing-history (page 34)
Guess he sold his shares?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0C:5BC0:40:142C:A28C:FDFF:FECA:87E7 (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BHA shareholder 

message: I'm trying to figure out which songs Slim used to layer this. This song is not on an album yet, as far as I know; it was a live performance track. I've looked around the internet and my music collection for days and can't find JACK SQUAT! I swear I heard some techno song around 2000 or before, maybe the Chemical Brothers or the like, that had that computer voice singing house, if you've heard the song. Driving me crazy. DandyDan68 (talk) 05:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatboy Slim Are We Having Fun Yet song
Talk:Strategic bombing

message: "The Trenchard School theories were successfully put into action in Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq) where RAF bombers used high-explosive bombs, gas bombs, and strafing against guerrilla forces."
The use of gas appears to be a myth. It is discussed here...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_British_use_of_chemical_weapons_in_Mesopotamia_in_1920
So I'm going to delete it. Cheezypeaz (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of gas in Mesopotamia  

message: — Assignment last updated by Lucipheric (talk) 01:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science
Talk:Tocopherol

message: Proposed: That the two articles, Tocopherol and Vitamin E, complement each other without large amounts of duplication, with the molecular structure and consequent bioactivity in Tocopherol, and Uses in Vitamin E. In each article, there will be a summary of the content that is expanded upon in the other article. The intended model here is how mineral articles have a link to the same minerals' roles in biology. At present there is extensive Uses content in the Tocopherol article, so this will require a transplant. Before I do this, anyone want to disagree? My plan is to clean up uses in March and do the transplant in April. Sources (foods table) already deleted here and existing only in Vitamin E. David notMD (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Uses transplanted to Vitamin E. Leaving behind shorter version here. Both still need a bit of work on Supplements and on Antioxidant theory. David notMD (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimizing duplication between Tocopherol and Vitamin E
Talk:Easton's Bible Dictionary

message: *  allows to insert links to relevant articles of Easton's. 
* can be inserted in articles derived mainly from Easton's.
:The above was moved from the article page to avoid self-reference. ✤ JonHarder talk 20:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Wikipedia

message: This article inappropriately mixes Wikipedia policy (which properly belongs in the Wikipedia namespace) and Wikipedia content, as well as suggestions about improving the article (which belong here on the talk page).
I know; I should be bold in editing; but I'm about to leave and just saw this. :) Jdavidb 21:11, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing policy and content 

message: Made a template,  --Random|832 11:27, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: God I hate Easton's Bible Dictionary.  Wikipedia's entries on Biblical subjects are bound to be deeply problematic to begin with, given the number of POV pushers to be found on these subjects.  But taking articles directly from an 1897 Bible Dictionary guarantees that we are starting from an extremely tendentious point.  Sigh.  I guess there's nothing to be done about it now. john k 05:47, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yuck 

message: Fond as I am of WikiProject:MEA, it's not good to have Wikipedia: stuff in the See also. I removed this:
* Easton's Dictionary List of topics (part of Missing encyclopedic articles project)
-- Jake 05:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved
Talk:Voice organ

message: Is this text in the public domain? -- April 08:50 Aug 7, 2002 (PDT)
What's with the first person plural voice ("we begin this inquiry")? Orthogonal 15:50, 7 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: I don't like the article's title "Voice production" - any better suggestions? Djbb2 18:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I decided to move this page to the title "Voice organ" which I thought was more specific, scientific and appropriate. I'm working on improving this article - any help would be much appreciated! Djbb2 19:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved
Talk:Go strategy and tactics

message: The page uses "to invade" a lot without explaining it beforehand. Reading about Go for strategy and tactics for the first time, I'm quite unsure how many stones and how far from some point are seen as an invasion. I'm not looking for numbers, just for a feeling. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.47.181.20 (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please shortly explain "to invade" 

message: PatheticCopyEditor (talk) 06:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yose has been merged and therefor the main template may no longer be in order. 

message: I propose to merge Go tactics and Go strategy into this one. There is no need to have three articles covering largely the same content. Additionally, they are all pedagogical essays and require extensive rewrite to resemble an encyclopedia article. If nobody minds, I will perform a very selective merge in a month's time, ie. on Nov 9. Reyk YO! 18:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge