Talk:Empire: Total War

message: I don't understand why all the entries from the talk page were removed?  especially so close to the release of the next installment of the game, when the comments on the talk page are even more relevant.  I propose the talk page be reverted to the way it was if nobody has a problem with that. 76.182.121.69 (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Previous discussion has be archived, not removed. See the Archive section in the above header. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

text: See WP:ARCHIVE, this is standard practice for Wikipedia talk pages. As Escape said, all previous threads are still accessible from theheader. In any case, this talk page and article aren't relevant for the release of Napoleon: Total War, beyond the one-sentence mention of the sequel in the release section. If you wish to make or view comments regarding Napoleon: Total War, the appropriate venue is the respective talk page rather than here. -- Sabre (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk Page Missing?

message: I figured I'd post this for anyone who is interested in the latest kieran brigden (creative assembly public relations representative) has to say to the ETW community on the total war center forums.  He created an account on those fan forums on the 19th of January under the handle TW Rehab.  Here is a link to all of his posts as listed on his user profile.  http://www.twcenter.net/forums/search.php?searchid=732201Dmcheatw (talk) 12:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More information on ETW from CA

message: How incredibly frustrating it is that this page gives the the incorrect impression that this game was overwhelmingly positively received. Ironically, thanks to wikipedia standards, we can only post official reviews and not user reviews. Almost all official reviews rave about the game, while the game was almost universally dissatisfying to most consumers. The disparity between the "expert" reviews and user reviews is striking; 90% to 67%.
It is an inconsistency that can't be addressed because of the rules, and an injustice, because what is posted here is not a reflection of the reality of the game. It is an inherent flaw in the, "Verifiability, not truth" standard of wikipedia. In fact, that's it right there. What is published is what is "officially" true, not what IS true. And here that disparity shows itself. As I said, it's an injustice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.58.155.210 (talk) 04:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the polemic, though at least you aren't going "conspiracy!" like some others have. Properly read the release and reception sections, they aren't "overwhelmingly positive" despite the high Metacritic score; the release section in particular deals with user complaints that can be adequately cited. Yes, we have to convey a positive tone because of the overall critical consensus, but there's plenty of criticism in the article. From the paragraph that you wrote then removed yourself: "Dissatisfaction with poor AI" – yup, in the reception section, "Game glitches, bugs and crashes" – covered in both reception and release sections, "game support" – already in the release section. Most of the concerns voiced by the vocal users, contray to their beliefs as they cannot look past the review scores, have been touched on in reviews and other appropriate secondary sources.-- Sabre (talk) 12:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would just like to concur with opinions expressed in this section.  The game is simply not well made.  The release date for their past 3 titles coincides with the end of SEGA's fiscal year - that should tell you something.  As should the fact that they are releasing a new game every year.  They've adopted a quantity approach, which necessitates sacrifices in quality. 24.136.240.123 (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but we don't go on personal observations and opinion. We use established secondary sources. -- Sabre (talk) 09:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I'd just like to comment

message: This article uses an FAQ from the Total War website as a source. The fact that the game has a technology tree is referenced with that page but the only comment about technology I can find is "And no, we’re not handling technological advances as set historical events. We’re giving you more control over the game than that, but as to how -that’s for another day." I don't think a hint is a reliable source. McLerristarr | Mclay1 16:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Personally, i felt the current description of the warpath alludes to an expansion rather than a stand alone campaign, hence the recent changes.
"Napoleon: Total War, which focuses on the life of Napoleon Bonaparte and was released in February 2010, builds upon the technology used for Empire: Total War, though according to Mike Simpson "the level of detail required to successfully depict the Napoleonic Wars is an order of magnitude greater than we were working to with Empire: Total War", among other reasons, contributed to the reasons why Napoleon: Total War was made a separate product from Empire: Total War." - was a little nonsensical, so i've edited that to make it a little more clear aswell. Though i'd post here so it doesn't look like i'm just reverting everything. -Evaristé93 (talk) 21:31, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion section 

message: It says the game spans from 1701 to the early 19th century. However, the Grand Campaign starts in the Summer of 1700. Should this be corrected? 184.57.178.125 (talk) 23:46, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1701 or 1700? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Empire: Total War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081219212922/http://uk.gamespot.com:80/pc/strategy/empiretotalwar/video.html?sid=6193642 to http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empiretotalwar/video.html?sid=6193642
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Empire: Total War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081219212916/http://uk.gamespot.com:80/pc/strategy/empiretotalwar/video.html?sid=6191477 to http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empiretotalwar/video.html?sid=6191477
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Empire: Total War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110927130019/http://www.pcformat.co.uk/blog-entry/review-empire-total-war-02-03-09 to http://www.pcformat.co.uk/blog-entry/review-empire-total-war-02-03-09
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Empire: Total War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamecyte.com/empire-total-war-preview-and-naval-combat
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Empire: Total War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081219221807/http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empiretotalwar/news.html?sid=6177198&mode=all to http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/empiretotalwar/news.html?sid=6177198&mode=all
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003051207/http://www.sega.co.uk/games/?t=EnglishUK&g=563 to http://www.sega.co.uk/games/?t=EnglishUK&g=563
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified