lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bihar School of Yoga

message: I've created a new page at the subpage provided. I don't think it violates any copyright - so how do I properly remove that copyvio on the actual 'Bihar School of Yoga' page? Also, I thought if an author is quoted and referenced, it is ok to use their work - isn't that correct? SourabhJ 07:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should it be Satyananda Yoga, it appears they are one in the same. I will move it unless I get advise otherwise. (See the reference at list of yoga schools) Paul foord 16:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: see Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2005_November_6 most of text is from http://www.yogavision.net/bsy/about.htm Paul foord 10:11, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Yoga Magazine redirects here but the school's site has almost no information on it, and the currently-published Yoga Magazine is actually published in UK--shouldn't that be the article then with a historical note about this school?--dchmelik☀️🦉🐝🐍(talk|contrib) 05:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoga Magazine
Talk:Ionic liquid

message: The positively charged, yet aromatic, pyrrolidine derivative in the image of common cations seems very unlikely to me, is there any reference/source for claiming it as a common ionic liquid component. I don't even know how you'd make it conveniently, let alone it being common place.
:You mean this weird pyrrole cation? Hmm, it would be radical cation, so yeah, seems suspicious. Mithoron (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cation images
Talk:Cambie Street

message: I think the following passage is a bit biased towards the Provincial Government. The introduction paragraph immediately jumps to the protesting along the corridor rather than providing an overview of Cambie's relationship with the Canada Line. The phrase "..successfully persuaded authorities to put the rail line in a tunnel instead of running it as a surface route" is an example of the below POV statements: 
When proposals to build the Canada Line (formerly known as the Richmond-Airport-Vancouver or RAV Line) along Cambie Street first emerged, they were heavily protested by residents and business owners who wanted to keep the street as a heritage boulevard. They argued in favour of using the existing Arbutus Street rail corridor instead.
Once the decision was made to use the Cambie alignment for the Canada Line anyway, residents along the corridor successfully persuaded authorities to put the rail line in a tunnel instead of running it as a surface route. Nonetheless, the cut-and-cover method (which will be used to build the tunnel) will likely introduce much disruption to traffic and business along the corridor during the construction. As such, even though it costs less than using a tunnel boring machine, the plan still draws heavy criticism, especially from area residents and businesses. -- Selmo 07:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:King Kamehameha I Day

message: Does this have anything to do with dragonball z?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qbadge (talk • contribs) 04:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: NO, dammit.--Atlantima (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: dragonball z

message: Temporary protection only for June 11 while this article is linked from the main page as a selected anniversary.  Ever since it was listed on the main page, several vandalism attempts were made within the course of a single hour from different ip addresses.  Page unprotection will happen on June 12.  --Gerald Farinas 08:03, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed protection.  --Gerald Farinas 02:48, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: What does the word pa‘u mean? I only know the word from a TV show where it applies to a blue priestess, and I doubt there’s any relation. The article just uses the word without bothering to explain it, and there is no Pa‘u article. —Frungi 16:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pa‘u? 

message: Should be made yearly, or as long as the page links directly with the main page, more than 30 edits on 2 hours, it is a lot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonoel (talk • contribs) 05:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection Again

message: I personally had to edit the article twice in less than 5 minutes. Once it had the word KAMEHAMEHAAAAAAA (more or less) and the other time it had something like "goku lives forever". I agree with the idea of protecting it. Gigakight (talk) 07:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection Once Again

message: According to the Wikipedia article on the band (to which reference is made in this article), the band is the SECOND oldest municipal band in the nation, not the oldest.  Which Wikipedia article has the correct information? 70.161.208.216 (talk) 14:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  It appears to have been vandalism:  I've reverted it. Viriditas (talk) 13:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Hawaiian Band

message: In the early 19th century, missionaries mentioned celebrations during the reign of King Kamehameha II lasting from late April to May honoring the death of Kamehameha I and the accession of Kamehameha II. Do these celebrations count as early forms of Kamehameha Day?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feast of Kamehameha
Talk:Navicular bone

message: Hello all,
Would it be possible to link the reference to Navicular Syndrome to the corresponding [Wikipedia page] ? I know this syndrome is a hot topic in equine veterinary studies and amongst equestrians, so a link may be helpful in directing people to additional information regarding the syndrome. This is especially helpful because the syndrome is often called simply "Navicular" amongst the equestrian community, so people searching for the syndrome likely encounter this page first. 
Just a quick thought!
Carolynslu (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Legit point to me, I'll be bold and add something, feel free to tweak, refine or revert.  Montanabw(talk) 03:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: I would have thought an article on the navicular bone might not be so specific to just horses and humans. I was reading through this (https://www.donqmedia.net/word-of-the-moment/plantigrade-digitigrade-and-ungulate/) thinking to myself that it might make more sense to structure the article in terms of form following function. Most folks with a decent understanding of anatomy will know how bone structure works. In the majority of higher-order land mammals, the navicular bone, the talus or the cuneiforms will each perform a broadly similar function. Nature loves a bit of copy-paste. I suppose what I was hoping for was an explanation on how the bone appears in plantigrades (e.g. bears), digitigrades (e.g. dogs) and ungulates (e.g. horses) and from there, how the bones differ. Shtanto (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit specific?
Talk:Treasure hunt (game)

message: I want to add a bunch of content about real treasure hunting, treasure hunters, etc. I started to do so, but it seems to me that putting it all into one article, along with the game, is probably the wrong way to go. So, I was thinking if maybe we should make this a disambig, and split the two up, and make two new pages (e.g. Treasure hunt (game) and Treasure hunting) for the actual content. Is that OK? Noel (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooops, I see we already have a Treasure hunting. So that answer the question of what to call the second one! Noel (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Games, etc

message: The Pennsylvania Lottery (USA) will start a 5-of-30 game called "Treasure Hunt" in May 2007. 216.179.123.201 20:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been inserted in the article: is there any authentic connection, or just the words?--Wetman 06:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pennsylvania Lottery

message: I have been trying to fit a page I wrote up into existing categories or groupings of similar pages.  It is about the Clue Chaser online treasure hunts (although the treasure is not tangible) and was wondering if there was any relevance to this topic?--MisterrBen (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New additions

message: I have inserted a paragraph describing the treasure trail as a genre of treasure hunt as this is a relatively new concept (a guided route with clues along the way). It is also necessary to help the public disambiguate from "Treasure Trail" which has another connotation. However I need to declare a conflict of interest since I am part of an organisation called Treasure Trails. I have tried to make the statement very objective and there is no link to an external website. I will keep my eyes open for an alternative  verifiable source.
K4thy67 (talk) 22:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Treasure trails
Talk:Tourism in Hawaii

message: Please consider adding new material or moving this material to WikiTravel - Marshman 17:52, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiTravel

message: The Kauaʻi island section is over half of the article. Why is this section so huge, in comparison to the other islands, where there is more tourism? Vchao (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: that was my impression too. Can someone answer on that? 171.66.53.67 (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Not only is it large, it's written like an advertisement.  Plenty of POV and weasel word problems abound.  This section can do with a lot of clean up. Gh5046 (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire article is laced with poor writing.  I cleaned up this section a little bit.  I don't have the gumption to attack the "activities" section, which can probably just be removed.  Gh5046 (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the 'tour guide' type information from the article, which was about half of the article.  My edit is here.  gh5046 (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kauaʻi section disproportionately large 

message: In the second paragraph it is stated “In 2017 alone, according to state government data, there were over 887.6 million visitors to the Hawaiian Islands” that number is way off 2601:405:4401:82F0:30:96A5:10D9:E4E0 (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourists per year number is way off
Talk:Follow-on

message: I moved this from following-on, as "follow-on" is the noun form of the term, so sits better as the title of an article. -dmmaus 09:07, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: in test cricket, if second team save the follow on and the frist team have lead, is second team can bat again in second inning before frist inning by second team decession? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.145.159.42 (talk) 09:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  follow-on 

message: Are these the only examples of a side following-on going on to victory? Or are there others unlisted? Kingnavland (talk) 06:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples comprehensive? 

message: Surprised to find that the related concept of Innings defeat is not the subject of an article. The follow-on entails the enticing (or humiliating) possibility of an innings defeat for the following-on side. One might compare it to an overbump in the Cambridge University May Bumps... Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Innings defeat]] 

message: What would be most useful (and what I looked after Michael Clarke's incredible decision yesterday) would be some statistics along the following lines for all Test matches:
Results when follow-on enforced/not enforced:
First innings lead: ?/?
Won: ?/?
Won by an innings: ?/not applicable
Drawn: ?/?
Lost: 3/?
Notes: any notable circumstance e.g. rain.
By not enforced I mean of course in those instances where it could have been. Obviously the circumstances of enforcing and not enforsing will be different (hence the request for the 1st innings lead) but it would give some idea of the gamble a captain is taking in not enforcing.
Spathaky (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More stats please
Template talk:Beethoven string quartets

message: I was in favour of renaming all the Beethoven string quartet articles so that the title includes the opus number, as I don't find "String Quartet No. 8" useful because the work is nearly always referred to as Op. 59 No. 2.  Then I thought this template would get around the issue with less work.
However, if there's agreement I will happily do the renaming and refactor this template accordingly as the category still seems less than usable.  --RobertG ♬ talk 09:12, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page naming convention

message: What is the deal with the redlinked String quartet arrangement of Op. 14, No. 1 by Beethoven at the bottom of the template? bd2412 T 16:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinked Op 14 arrangement
Talk:Our Friends in the North

message: The article states that the 2010 DVD release had a shorter clip from the song "Don't Look Back in Anger" so the credits ran in silence, and the reason is unknown. I haven't seen it to check, but if it's true it could be an issue with the royalties.
Using a 30-second music clip may be "fair use" in some contexts and countries. This 2009 UK article gives a few examples. I doubt the DVD company paid the record company nothing, but maybe costs were considerably lower with a shortened version of the song . On Daria's DVD release, for cost reasons, almost all copyrighted music was replaced.-Responsible? (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Shortened music clip
Talk:Adelaide Film Festival

message: This page has become unwieldy, repetitive of the website and prone to going out of date. I suggest removing many of the list items to make it more readable and navigable, possibly creating a separate article for ADFF Awards. Also, much of the text is copied straight from the website, which is against copyright and also unnecessary. Archives of all festivals since 2013 are availabe here and earlier ones can be found quite easily, such as 2009 here. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Too long and too many lists
Talk:HaNoar HaOved VeHaLomed

message: I do not know who translated the goals but this translation is very problematic.  Maybe I'l try do it better.--מיתרפ (talk) 19:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The translation of the goals. 

message: I have delited this :
 
the goals are in the oficcal site. and also i'm a member of the movement and I can say it's whrite on the member's card.Nizzan Cohen (talk) 14:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goals 

message: the colors of the emblem in the article arenot the conventional colors. see on the hebrew articleNizzan Cohen (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emblem 

message: Maybe we ought to change the name of this article from transliterated Hebrew name to the English name "General Federation of Students and Young Workers in Israel"? If someone wants to search for it, there will be a redirect. The reason is an aesthetic one. When I saw the name for the first time, with all the extra capital letters I recieved an heart attack, and after I came back from Ichilov, I"d like to offer a change to this name change.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 10:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: On their English page they call themselves "Working and Studying Youth". Seems like a better name for the article because it's sourced as well as shorter and cleaner. I think we should replace it in the lead as well. “WarKosign” 10:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Even in English publications, HaNoar HaOved VeHaLomed seems to be the WP:COMMONNAME; the formal title proposed has only one match on Google books. "Working and Studying Youth" has 170, but there are some hits that are not related to this subject. However, HaNoar HaOved VeHaLomed has 871, so even minus the first couple of entries that are related to the Wiki article, it's clearly the most used name. Number 57 11:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

text: Number 57 seems to have the strongest argument for keeping the title as is. "Working and Studying Youth" is used on their English website, and should be used in the opening sentence instead of the formal translation. Debresser (talk) 11:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

text: Agree that the Hebrew name should be kept. This is the name used in all scholarly academic publications.--Geewhiz (talk) 11:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Reavers (comics)

message: I altered some incorrect or confusing information in the history. The original Reavers in Australia were not formed by Donald Pierce. The Reavers were Australian-based cyborgs prior to the super-group that incorporated the surivors plus Pierce, Deathstrike, and the mercenaries. Also, Pierce was the White Bishop, not the White King (although he was once called the King in error). The crucial sources for this info are Uncanny X-Men #248-252. --JamesAM 23:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alteration 

message: According to Uncanny X-Men #132, donald Pierce was the White King and Harry Leland was the White Bishop.  This needs to be changed back.
:I see no such reference in #132. I have never seen Harry Leland referred to as the White Bishop. Furthermore, The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe: Deluxe Edition #5, on pages 45 and 46, it clearly notes that Pierce is the White Bishop and Leland is the Black Bishop. In addition, Pierce has never been treated as being of equal rank to Shaw. As I noted previous, Pierce was once referred to as the former White King after being referred to as the White Bishop. This White King referrence was apparently an error and an aberration. I believe it was called an error in one of the letter pages. If someone wants to put "(sometimes referred to as White King)", I don't think that would be a problem. But it would be inaccurate to replace the reference to him being the White Bishop. --JamesAM 01:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  White King or Bishop? 

message: Like I said in the history, I know it's a bit silly-buggers I know about the fight with Punisher, but not the exact names of the Reavers who attacked him. Am working on it. Lots42 20:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually found the information. Go me! Lots42 01:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vs. Punisher 
Talk:Grodno Region

message: Hmmm... According to the 1989 census there were roughly 417.700 Poles in Belarus, huge majority of them living in the area of Grodno. At the same time this article claims that there are only 2.800 of Poles. What happened to the rest of them? Also, why is the alleged number of Poles living there much smaller than the number of the Polish Association in Belarus (ZPB)? Halibutt 10:00, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
:OK I know: the belarusian web site is screwed up. The title says Hrodna, but the text speaks about "Mogilev region". A cut-n-paste problem, so data is unverified. I will look for Hrodna. mikka (t) 15:26, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks for the vigilance. Jeszcze Polska nie zginiela! mikka (t) 15:59, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Poles in Hrodna

message: Restored the Polish language reference that was removed. There is a significant polish-speaking minority in the current Voblast. Ajh1492 (talk) 12:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a significant Polish speaking minority in London as well, why not add Polish there? --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 12:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add it to Chicago since it is the 2nd largest Polish-speaking city on the planet, but it's Chicago in Polish. Hrodna Voblast, by the Belarus government, has a significant Polish minority, what is the problem with leaving the Polish reference in the article? Ajh1492 (talk) 13:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Polish is not official in Belarus. Only Belarusian and Russian are. It does not even have regional status on Oblast level. --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 14:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

text:  Polish minority in Belarus  Ajh1492 (talk) 15:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored Polish landguage reference 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Administrative divisions of Belarus which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: User:Iryna Harpy introduced the following with one edit
* calling the entity "province" in the text while the article is named with the designator "region"
* talk of "Grodno region" during WW2, which could mean a loosely defined area and not the administrative region/oblast
* "Grodno region constitutes one of 6 provinces" sic!
Additionally she changed links to articles that are named "X District" to lead to "X district". I reverted that. Then she asks, coupled with personal attacks, that I revert all my edits to Belarus  "please revert all of your changes to Belarus, Ukraine, etc.". Derianus (talk) 02:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial changes to the article
Talk:Mary Poovey

message: I have now several times included the "Scientist stub"-tag. I have done so for this reason. Mary Poovey is a professor at the NYU's Faculty of Arts and Science . As such, she is active in the academic field of humanities and arts. The humanities are, according to the article, "generally considered to be, along with the social sciences and the natural sciences, one of three major components of the liberal arts and sciences." According to the list of academic disciplines, its academic status is not debated. Therefore I see no reason to question the scientific status of Mary Poovey's field of play, and I therefore don't see why a "Scientist stub"-tag shouldn't be included. According to Wikipedia itself, Mary Poovey is a scientist. Aecis 10:11, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vincent Corleone

message: His last name is Mancini and adopts Corleone at the end of the film. Saying Mancini-Corleone gives the impression that he had both last names since the beginning. If you're to do this, might as well change the (original) godfather's name to Vito Andolini-Corleone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.142.220 (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The page should me moved. That comment is absolutely correct. Joefromrandb (talk) 23:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and moved the page. It only makes sense. Joefromrandb (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  why mancini-corlene? 

message: : Vincent continued on as Don of the Corleone family through Michael's death in 1997.
How did you get this information? See Talk:Michael Corleone. -- Toytoy 10:52, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
It would help to mention that Vincent's character is played by Actor Andy Garcia. I think this is a vital bit of info which needs to be added most of all --Wildflower686 11:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael's death? 

message: I don't understand why his successor in the Corleone crime family is listed as "Classified"? I don't know enough myself to change it or flag it, but it seemed strange.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargat (talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classified? 

message: This whole section is not referenced properly. Just mentioning the commentary on the DVD of GFIII is not sufficient to avoid your good work being reverted.I would prefer to see it remain in situ. Hoping someone (if not you) will come to the rescue, I have added a template to both paragraphs.Sincerely, Gareth Griffith-Jones|The Welsh Buzzard| 06:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned sequel 

message: The Introduction says, "In the 1972 film The Godfather Sonny has a sexual encounter with Lucy the day he is killed; no further reference is made to Lucy until Part III." Is that correct, or does it describe the day that Sonny attacked Carlo on the street?Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 11:05, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing inaccurate sentence.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sonny and Lucy