Talk:Tata Consultancy Services

message: Please keep the discussion on this page about public side of the company and to discuss about how to improve this article. Wikipedia is not the place to vent out grievances about your company or to praise about your company. You can choose some blog service or social networking websites for that purpose.--Indianstar 11:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please don't discuss internal company matters

message: Well, i am a TCS employee(not manager but engineer) and have friends who work in all the so called BIG SHOT firms, but the thing everytime comes to my mind is that, whosoever is working (regardless of where he works) is unhappy, cause is the human tendency which always makes the grass looks green on the other side. So what does this implies, everyone should just keep cursing his company. I followed up all the articles present in the discussions( and archives as well), i find few guys are just fuming over TCS. And one more thing when i joined, my certificates were taken just for the purpose of verification and were returned to me an hour after the verification was completed. And friends one more thing i would like to say, the onsite chances which TCS gives to its employees are considered the best among all the IT circles
Prithvi raj 07:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Few short notes

message: Why is he deleting the anti employee policy section again and again? Bet he is bribed by TCS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.45.225.96 (talk • contribs) 
Konstable is obviously me.  Your second sentence is not civil enough to warrant a response from me.  As to your first question - I have already given my reasons for removing the anti-employee policy in the edit summary.  But I will describe them again for your sake.  The statements inserted do not fit with Wikipedia's policies of Verifiability (ie no reliable sources are cited) and Neutral Point of View; and since this statement acts as an accusation these are essential.  These comments are also most likely Original Research on behalf of the user who keeps putting them in - please note that original research is against Wikipedia policy.  If you want to insert something about their employee relations, please cite reliable sources and present it in a more neutral manner.--Konstable 07:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is this guy konstable? 

message: It is unfortunate that a bunch of anon users feel the need to re-insert unverified original research attacks on the company.  I am not against you saying anything bad about the company, I don't know a single thing about it, but if you need to make claims they cannot be original reserach, they have to be neutral and they have to be verified - these are Wikipedia's official policies. If you feel that my comments here are unjustified in terms of Wikipedia's policy, please feel free to discuss it on this talk page, or contact me on my talk page if you need to.
However, if you keep re-inserting this material I will have to report those involved as vandals to try to force an end to this, and blocks may have to be made.  I don't want to do this because at least some of the anon editors behind this have made some useful contributions in other articles, and I assume these statements on this page are inserted through personal anger at the company and lack of understanding of Wikipedia's policies rather than vandalism.  But if you continue without even any attempt on discussion, this may have to be done.--Konstable 02:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinserting original research 

message: I am going to tag this article again for references. If anyone wants to remove it, please add a references or notes section, with relevant references. Rigmahroll 00:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References needed 

message: A lot of text has been added to the article on April 10, 2007 from the IP address 59.163.25.48. This IP address seems to be from IIT Bombay. The text looks pretty technical and has been added in about 30 minutes. There is a possibility that it could be copied/pasted from a term paper or a research paper or an article. I will revert to an older version and flag it for potentially copyrighted material. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 23:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is done. It would be great if someone can have a look at the version in question () and suggestion a better way to handle this. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 00:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have tagged various sections for references. I have also tagged the SWOT analysis section which seems to draw conclusions without any citations as POV. It could all be original research. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 16:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large additions to the article 

message: :Image:TCSL.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is taken care. -- Anshuk (talk) 08:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TCSL.JPG

message: This is a claim made by the company based on the assumption that IT Services = India, and not anywhere else. If you combine IBM presence in India, China, Singapore, Japan etc. it is far larger than any Indian IT Services company. Therefore it does not hold valid and is being deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.64.40.50 (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asia's Largest Software Firm 

message: How does US Visa Program have anything to do with TCS as a company?
Such notes should be part of US Visa Program as wiki article. Its apt to mention it out there and not on company's article.
--Sandyiit (talk) 21:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Visa Program 

message: Removed the comment attributed to an anonymous blog. I don't think it carries weight as an authentic piece of information about the company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.97.196.155 (talk) 11:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References from anonymous blogs 

message: The article state that TCS has over 4 million employees. In the context of the wikipedia List of largest employers, it seems clear that this is a lie. 69.119.102.202 (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please point out where in the article it says that TCS has 4 million employees. Prolix 💬 14:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Employees 

message: The user in question has been persistently reverting edits to his preferred version of the page which includes this image in particular :File:TCS Gitanjali Park Kolkata.jpg. I had reverted the addition of the image initially on the grounds of said image being much lower in quality than the previously used image. The user disagrees and started edit warring. I have limited myself to 3 reverts as per the policy and have made attempts to resolve the issue on the user's talk page to no avail. This is my final attempt at reaching a resolution. , I expect your reply at the earliest. Prolix 💬 11:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent addition of a low quality image by {{u|BNJ Nilam}} 

message: There are a number of passagse that seem written like an advertisement, including the inclusion in the lede (!) of the fact that TATA was on an industry-sponsored "most innovative companies" list. DenverCoder9 (talk) 23:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Tone + Close Connection to source 

message: I have repeatedly removed non-notable promotional material, like the mention in the lede (!) that  TATA was on an industry-sponsored "most innovative company". Editors continue to re-add without talk page discussion. 
You must discuss before adding promotional material. DenverCoder9 (talk) 04:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: Tata was the recipient of one of the largest IP settlements in history. This is definitely notable enough for the lede. I'll revert. DenverCoder9 (talk) 02:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest IP settlement