lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sanctuary Review Committee

message: According to a report on a presentation by Arthur Patrick, the following recent scholars have "contributed to a better understanding of the issues canvassed at Glacier View": Rolf Poehler, Fritz Guy, Alden Thompson, Kai Arasola and Ray Roennfeldt. Colin MacLaurin 08:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: Should we rename this article? "Sanctuary Review Committee" is one possible official title. "Sacking of Desmond Ford" is more descriptive (would need to consult standard neutral word for "sacking") than the obscure "Glacier View...". Colin MacLaurin (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Pasteles

message: I believe that it should be noted that pasteles made in Hawaii are made similarly to the ones made in Puerto Rico. There is no description as to how the pasteles in Hawaii are made. I also believe that pasteles are still spelled pasteles in Hawaii, it is just the pronunciation of it that is different. --Reuben2011 (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's spelled differently and recipe book, written by Puerto Ricans of Hawaii for their centennial celebration (of when migrations to Hawaii began), says they used different ingredients to make 'em. They had to improvise. And if you want to know the book I'm talking about-I'm looking for it right now.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 13:19, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pasteles in Hawaii

message: "The correct name for a Puerto Rican Pastel is Mamie."
Honestly, it's a bit condescending to say "correct".  I've never heard of it, and the reference linked doesn't support the "Mamie" naming. Perhaps "another traditional name for a Puerto Rican Pastel is Mamie" but I can't even find another reference to that name.  2600:8804:660B:C400:8C73:DA52:ECBC:5030 (talk) 23:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mamie 

message: In Mexico a pastel is a cake as in a decorated birthday cake wedding cake complete with icing etc. Peter Horn.2 (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico 

message: This article is about a primarily Caribbean dish. What is described under the history section has little relevance as Argentina is a distinct cultural area in Latin America and in an entirely different region. Moreover, the dish described therein sharing the same name has little relation to the dish. This should be revised and amended or removed since it is unrelated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:8B0C:A8D6:19DC:2C2:3317:74C8 (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mercy11 (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: It would be good to actually describe this food item as the very first thing rather than talk about the geography of the dish.  I've read the intro and the first variation info and I still don't know just what this thing is.  I'm in Puerto Rico and am trying to understand items on menus without having to order them. 
Gnuarm (talk) 02:51, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant/Archive 1

message: *I know that there was at least one highly-critical review in a secondary source I saw somewhere but I can't seem to find it at the moment.  If someone else does feel free to either put it here on the talk page, or add it to the Reviews section in the same formatting style as the others.  Smee 07:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: *Prev edits by anon ip are confusing, and also not only removed sourced material from the article, but added unsourced material to the article.  Please discuss here.  Smee 03:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unsourced material 

message: #Well-written: Fail
#Factually accurate: Pass 
#Broad: Pass 
#Neutrally written: Pass
#Stable: Pass 
#Well-referenced: Pass
#Images: Pass
This article passes everything except for the reviews section, which is currently broken up into individual reviews is a listy format.  The section should be prose paragraphs in one whole "reception" section, possible organized by critique than reviewer, though that's more optional.  Also, the lead has too many redlinks, either de-link or wrote articles for the theaters.  Message me on my talk page for a quick re-review at any time.  --PresN 16:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, T Rex | talk 05:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Pass
Talk:Twilight of the Idols

message: The line 
Nietzsche criticizes German culture of the day as unsophisticated, decadent and nihilistic, and shoots some disapproving arrows at key French, British, and Italian cultural figures who represent similar tendencies. In contrast to all these alleged representatives of cultural decadence, Nietzsche applauds Caesar, Napoleon, Goethe, Thucydides and the Sophists as healthier and stronger types.
Is also present with minor changes in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche-life-works. I'm not experienced enough with Wikipedia to deal with this or even if it's necessary but maybe someone else can. Thanks! tildejustin (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential plagiarism 

message: The edit history of this page shows that Ferrer himself added a link (without a clear header?) to his English translation at the bottom of the page. While it is generous of Ferrer to share his work for free, this translation is not authoritative and has several errors. Should the link here be removed or annotated in some way? Iconofiler (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with the linked translation by Ferrer

message: Thanks for writing this article.  It's hard to summarize this book and this author.  I'm not sure I would have made the same synopsis of this work, but I don't have specific complaints with it either. 
It would be nice to put it in a little context of the other writings from this period.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.177.193 (talk) 21:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsigned 

message: Building a new article on wikipedia and I am looking to collaborate with a Nietzsche scholar.  The focus is specifically geared towards unravelling N.'s last two works: Twilight of The Idols and The Anti-Christ.  I have to be extremely judicious (conservative) in my attribution of themes to Nietzsche, so I'd like to have someone more tapped into the peer-reviewed, mainstream consensus of standard Nietzsche scholarship to mediate and provide guidance to the claims I am about to make.  Either contact me here-> 
-- Contributions/Skychildandsonofthesun SKYchild  07:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CALLING: Nietzsche scholars for Collaboration 

message: I'm all in favour of organizing the synopsis by the sections Nietzsche organizes the book by, e.g., The Problem of Socrates, Reason in Philosophy, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikem1234 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change synopsis organization
Talk:From the Earth to the Moon (film)

message: From this article's history I see that it has twice been removed from the Category:Steampunk films by RepublicanJacobite. It certainly belongs to this category, so it would be interesting hearing RepublicanJacobite's objections. Tekwani (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Steampunk is a word backformed from cyberpunk because the genre was started in the 1980s by cyberpunk authors like William Gibson. The setting is the 19th century, the tech is steam based but most importantly the perspective is retro-, i.e. written long after the 19th century. Verne is a 19th century author, he never knew what steampunk was. He wrote science fiction, period. A film based on his novel is not 'steampunk'. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steampunk films
Talk:Damir Siraciev

message: Когда отдавали машинистке перепечатывать черновик текста Декларации, я и депутат Дамир Сиразиев взяли и восстановили в перепечатке через тире после “ТССР” вычеркнутые комиссией слова “Республика Татарстан”.[ http://www.businesspress.ru/newspaper/article_mId_43_aId_23160.html] 
If this is about the same person, please look for sources that confirm this fact. `'Míkka 18:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly, the same. See  It is so bad than he wasn't included to the Tatar Encyclopedia.. No material to be found on the www more ((...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Untifler (talk • contribs) 19:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this the same persion?

message: Mustafin Lenar Raidovich (born 1974), Siraziev Ravil Raidovich, Sirazieva Dilyara Raidovna  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.234.12.47 (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Bill Callahan discography

message: Drag City and discogs say it was released 1997, while Hausmusik and the reference prefer 1996. does anyone know for sure? i tend to go with 96...--Wiesengrund 08:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Came Blue 

message: This article included album covers in its discography. These have had to be removed. Please see #1 under "unaccepable images" and WP:Albums#Discography. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images in discographies
Talk:Haruko Arimura

message: Did she actually get the PhD? Her official government bio page only says she enrolled in the program: The Cabinet: Haruko Arimura, as did an event bio on her that I edited today. --Ben Hourigan (talk) 08:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chris Peterson (producer)

message: What's going on? there is random crap on the bottom!--Frozen4322 Talk Stalk Walk 15:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, Electrnic musicion stub tag was vandaled--Frozen4322 Talk Stalk Walk 15:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: I have added a hell of a lot more info, not a Stub anymore! --Frozen4322 Talk Stalk Walk 14:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamped 

message: why is listed as being in the band, when Front line assemblys wiki has a sectioned "Fulber replaced by Peterson (1997–2002)" and all the production credits arre for albums from the end of the 90s?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.55.165.81 (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990... 

message: I started rewriting the article due to overall poor quality – there was a reason it had a cleanup tag. I renamed the section about Peterson's music activites and added most of the bands and projects he's worked with in the past in order to have a starting point for a section in prose. Also, I removed dead, outdated and poorly formatted links and added up-to-date links. IndustrialGiant (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Farrer Football League

message: Please note that this league was formed in 1957. The league that was formed in 1930 was the Albury District FL - a completely seperate competition that played it's last season also in 1957 before folding as clubs moved to the new league (Source: The Daily Advertiser). AFL-Cool 10:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation year
Talk:Oarsome Foursome

message: I think it is stretching it that it has lasted to 2012 Olympics. the original oarsome is a core group. LibStar (talk) 04:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what you mean and I bristled when I first heard the 2012 commentators refer to this version as an Oarsome Foursome. I think the point is about lineage and I have found and included three published citations referencing how the 2012 crew were titled by contemporary press. I was unable to find any press refs to the 2000 or 2004 men's 4- crews being called the Oarsome Foursome, so I guess that supports the argument that it's about direct lineage-Sticks66 13:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012 oarsome foursome
Talk:William Borthwick, 1st Lord Borthwick

message: There is some confusion with dates. Both the 1st and 2nd Lords were both called William. If we could find another source for his year of death it would help matters. I would like to know where the 1470 comes from. I cannot find it anywhere and it seems a bit late for him. Bain (1888) has Sir William senior appearing as a truce commissioner as far back as 1398 which means he must have been at least 30 years old then. Sir William junior is first mentioned by Bain as one of the ambassadors to Rome in 1425 and his first mention of William Lord Borthwick is in July 1459. David Lauder 09:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article (and that for his son) state that both William 1st and his son William 2nd Lord Borthwicks were married to Beatrix Sinclair both daughters of Hernry Sinclair 1st Earl Orkney. I can't believe both statements to be true. 85.237.100.76 (talk) 10:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Was his son married to his wife's sister?
Talk:Gorets mutiny

message: There seems to be no context in this page; please add a little background.  Thank you. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 09:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Partially observable Markov decision process

message: This page lacks lots of information. A better description of algorithms, some nicer examples, and links to introductory texts would be really good.
It is also sort of biased: only one application is mentioned, when there are actually lots of great work done with POMDPs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.37.187.41 (talk) 09:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am working on this page whenever I can. I believe it should include some information on the derivation of the belief space MDP, and distinguish between exact and approximate solution techniques. I will add new sections and subsections when they're ready. I'll link to some new developments, such as continuous state POMDPs, bayes-adaptive POMDPs and POMDPs with imprecise parameters. Please let me know if you plan on working on this and let's do it together. Beniz (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rework 

message: The end of the formal definition states that a reward is given equal to R(s, a), but this seems confusing to me -- should it be that the reward is based on the state being transitioned to, i.e. R(s', a)?
:It can go either way. While I agree with you that it is more intuitive and often appropriate to define rewards as dependent on the next state, different formulations of POMDPs and MDPs use different semantics for the reward function. The most complete form is a reward function that depends on the prior state, the action taken, and the resulting next state: R(s, a, s'), but expressing the problem as a reward function that depends only on the prior state and action (R(s, a)) is quite common and in some sense simplifies the Value Function equations you solve (it pulls the reward term out of the next state marginalization). If your reward function depends on the next state, you can always reexpress it in the R(s, a) form by simply marginalizing over the possible outcomes states: R(s,a) = \sum_{s'} T(s' | s, a) R(s, a, s'). Since you can always do this conversion, it's okay to use the R(s, a) version in theoretical discussions. Jmacglashan (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reward based on current or next state?
Talk:Les Norton

message: What has the attached picture got to do with Les Norton the fictional book character? Robert G Barrett is in the record many times stating that Les Norton is 100% fictional and has no real life analogy, yet the imaged attached here is of some guy called “Ken Wills” followed by the bizarre line “the real Les Norton”. That picture is completely irrelevant and nonsensical 120.152.29.77 (talk) 11:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point; I'm not sure when that picture was added. I've removed it. Damien Linnane (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attached Picture
Talk:Kim Craig

message: I´ve just removed the redirect from this page (to the series main page). Although it is true that the page lacks references, as one of the main characters of the series it is noticeable enough to has his own page. Jlascar 03:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:The Koala Brothers

message: Although his plodding gait suggests he may be a "tortoise", in the episode "George Goes Faster", he refers to how he had a skateboard as a young "turtle".--GrammarStickler (talk) 13:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  George is a Turtle! 

message: Looking at the article, it refers to Mitzi as a Possum.  I have been watching the Koala Brothers for some time, and to the best of my knowledge and intellect, Mitzi looks like a Koala, walks and acts like a Koala.  So why in the name of all that is holy is she listed as a possum??? Thor Malmjursson (talk)
The narrator mentions it in a few episodes. It is also referenced on official web pages such as this one. Removed this particular need for a citation. Although I agree the article in general would need sources.--Ianolito (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitzi is a WHAT??? 

message: I noticed that someone had added a partial list of the people who did the voices for the show (or at least the English version), but it is still missing the voice actors for many of the other characters, mostly the female ones. The IMDB profile for this show (  ) lists Lucinda Cowden and Janet James in addition to the ones already mentioned here, but does not specify which roles they exactly play. Could someone therefore point me to reliable external web sites with this information?
Also, I have been watching this show as of late, and I'm now almost positive that, other than the Koala's plane, the vehicles used in the show - Alice's scooter, Sammy's truck, and Lolly's ice-cream truck - are all at least based on real-world vehicles. Alice's scooter is almost certainly a vintage model of a Vespa, or something that looks very much like it. I'm unable to identify the other two vehicles though, but looking at the styling cues of Lolly's ice-cream truck, I believe it to be based on a mid-20th century van or truck. I'm not sure if all these is worth mentioning, but my opinion is that it might be. The Vespa article has a list of TV shows that features characters riding or using Vespas, and if indeed Alice's scooter is a Vespa, then we could mention it there. Of course, all of this will need citations, and this is where things will get difficult. --A.K.R. (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casting List + Vehicles in the Show 

message: Could somebody add information about when the series was made, please? This is absolutely basic information for an encyclopaedia article. Thanks for this. --New Thought (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic Information: When The Series Was Made 

message: The first line of the article says that this is an Australian series. While the setting is Australia, as far as I can find out this is a UK series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.210.12.229 (talk) 04:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian? 

message: Question Does Mitzi act like a Big Sister to Ned True or False CoolMouse6667 (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitzi Big Sister
Talk:New York Court of Claims

message: The following section was moved from the article page to the talk page.:
The New York State Court of Claims is the exclusive forum for civil litigation seeking damages against the State of New York...so says the home page of the Court of Claims.  As one reads this statement don't be fooled by the word exclusive. Most claimants who pursue an action against the state of NY have their cases dismissed under the guise of Article 78 which is in the superior court of NY. One pursuing an action against NY must be aware of the pitfalls. Recovering damages is difficult as well. Most decisions that are overturned in the Court of Claims are now too late to go to the Superior Court. Even at that Article 78 provides a remedy that involves a change of the decision of the agency that has overstepped or has abused its authority only it rarely provides any monetary comfort for all the effort to have wrong corrected.. A review of the case law which includes the pleadings shows the Court of Claims currently considers any action by a New York agency a decision, not a matter of conduct. Further the Court of Claims website does not produce the pleadings, only the decision. It is important that there should be the pleading posted as well. This allows the reader to know all the facts about the case and the true basis of the judge's decision. Hopefully the Court of Claims will provide more disclosure so that pro ce litigates are not mislead as aforementioned "exclusive".
The info should be wikified and worked into to the article text. Kraxler (talk) 12:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved section
Talk:Sipoo

message: The official name in English is Sibbo, and should hence be changed to that. (Compare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ing%C3%A5 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakobstad )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.115.31.130 (talk) 12:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name is Sibbo 
Talk:Lynch motor

message: If anyone could find a picture of the motor the article would be greatly improved and much more under standable.
Pictures can be found on www.lmcltd.net but I cant work out how to add them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.92.6 (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I believe the lynch patents expired a couple of years ago. the page says the rights are still held 85.83.19.103 (talk) 15:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Patent expired

message: Plenty of information in this article, but the introductory section is difficult to read due to wall of words and run-on sentences. Also subject grouping could probably be improved. Suggest a bit of copy editing would benefit. CPES (talk) 14:58, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Readability

message: Is there a different page for Cedric? If not, the link should be removed. MaxConfusion (talk) 14:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link from this article to Cedric Lynch leads to itself.
Talk:Roland Smith

message: Roland Smith just released a new book. It's title is I, Q, but I can't do HTML graphs. Could someone please add it for me?
I bought it from my school's book fair, but I don't know if it is avalible outside of the school distribution market.--Angeljon121 (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  His new book
Talk:2007 Universal Forum of Cultures

message: this page does not include anything about the cost, financing, or controversies surrounding this event. Hari Seldon 10:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that article is so neutral that is neither incluiding positive nor negative comments about the event.  I think (I may be wrong) that article is just listing general info about the event without the opinion of the one that included that info.  As a matter of fact article doesnt include anything about cost, controversies etc.. but that doesnt means that article is not neutral, thats just meas that article is incomplete. Well, thats just my opinion. regards Abögarp 18:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Just to remark that I have changed the time guidelines to show that the forum has ended (will take place = took place, etc). D14852001|Neko (talk) 06:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ending