lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Drip-O-lator

message: Drip-O-lators are out-of-fashion and have not been produced for 50 years or so.  Drip-O-lators are merely collectible pottery; Drip-O-lators are not a product for sale to be used for brewing coffee.  
:What does "NN Appliance" stand for?  I didn't expect that this article would create a stir.Velocicaptor 16:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that. NN stands for non-notable. Basically, I nominated it for deletion because it fails our notability guideline, WP:N, which is to say we don't have "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources". If such exists, please add them to the article and remove the deletion tag. -- Y not? 16:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I first saw the word "Drip-O-lator" in an old, large dictionary.  Old unabridged dictionaries may contain descriptions of "Drip-O-lators."  A drawing of a "Drip-O-lator" is in the old, large dictionary that I saw and that first I saw "Drip-O-lator" mentioned.  Since "Drip-O-lator is in dictionaries, I decided to create the "Drip-O-lator" page for Wikipedia, too.Velocicaptor 16:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dictionaries
Talk:Religious skepticism

message: I didn't make any edits but wanted to pose the question, how would you be a skeptical and not be an atheist? It seems like skepticism's consequence is necessarily atheism, and, were I to draw a ven diagram, skeptics would have a circle entirely encompassed by the circle that atheists get.
:There is the option of being an agnostic. (And there is a difference.) Waluigi Freak 99 00:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Skepticism is subjective. For example I'm skeptical about some things but I'm not an atheist.
Sioraf (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: The heading speaks for itself. I'd love help, suggestions, etc... please direct them here or my talk page Rap Chart Mike (talk) 18:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking the rewrite live, I hope it's considered an improvement and Im sure someone will let me know if there are any concerns about my work. Rap Chart Mike (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite research in progress
Talk:Robotoid

message: OK, this term may have been used as far back as 1966 regarding Robby the Robot from Lost in Space but I'm still researching it. However, Beter may have been the first to coin "organic robotoid". -Eep² 16:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: word origin

message: *Refs
*Notability - Does this need an article
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: The article says, "... credits Robby the Robot as a "robotoid" and William Bramley and Ollie O'Toole as uncredited "robotoid voice" actors." Which is it. Do they, or do they not, get credit? 
IAmNitpicking (talk) 11:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits ... uncredited actors? 

message: robotoid (noun, plural: robotoids)
definitions:
# a humanoid which has robotic physical appearance and doesn't look exactly as a human
#: a humanoid which has human-inspired body parts, but not human-like
# a machine which has human-like intelligence, but non human-like appearance
The difference between 1. and 2. is that in entry 1. are described the humanoid robots which have human-inspired body parts, but not human-like.
The limbic system (empathy, emotions and experience/experiencing assimilation) can also be reproduced via artificial neural networks. (usually we use artificial neural network simulation on a standard processing unit; but some computer scientists actually create intricate connectome processing units (you mimic the human brain, but nowadays they close some parts of an intricate printed network - because electonics nowadays cannot move and physically change enough, they just close and open parts of a big connectome - a very wrong approach - very wasteful, but we will fix it 100%, the idea of physically intricate connectomes isn't wrong - we will fix it in the future [people who try hard never give up, and always win! If you kill them, more experimentalists are born. Improvement is eternal]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:411A:7500:2DBA:26CB:149D:2223 (talk) 03:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robotoids are humanoids which don't look like humans, sometimes they even look like machines 

message: This reference was to a conspiracy newsletter of some sort (or a weird audiobook using the conceit of a conspiracy newsletter). Did no one notice the junior-high joke, "peter beater"? IAmNitpicking (talk) 02:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Beter? Really?
Category talk:People from Dnipro

message: People, this category could substituted or added with a :Category:People from Dnipropetrovsk oblast. This is the better way to reflect the issue of "Dnipropetrovsk Clan". You see, many people from that powerful clan were born in the oblast cities but worked in the city itseflf (Brezhnev, Sherbytskyi etc.)AlexPU 16:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Thodi Khushi Thode Gham

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thodi Khushi Thode Gham(some happiness some sadness). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 01:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thodi Khushi Thode Gham(some happiness some sadness)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:John Row (poet)

message: I created this article as a result of bumping into the guy at the May Day festival in Ipswich.  I think he is worthy of an article, but it will take some work!  I remember the guy 'telling stories' to us when I was at primary school.  At least 15 years ago.  Over the next few days I plan to expand this article.  His website has a wealth of information.  I was telling him today what I wanted the pictures for, I said that I thought he was worthy of an article on Wikipedia (which he said he knew about), and I'm going to do it for him.  Takes a lot for one speaker at a primary school to be remembered by a student 15 years later! That, and everything else he's done in prisons for example, makes him notable to me. Jsc83 17:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Creation
Talk:Kirkland Lake

message: Much of this article is horrible. None of it is cited. Much of it is obviously hearsay and to be honest takes a defensive tone instead of an objective one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.76.7 (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was move. Mindmatrix 03:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous dialogue

message: Why is the north end of Kirkland Lake called the federal area? NorthernThunder (talk) 09:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal 

message: * Added reference about how the town got its name (Barnes) Phae girl (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Log 
Talk:Flagler Estates, Florida

message: I am a new Wikipedian in Florida.  I am a licensed professional engineer in Florida.  I am the District Engineer for Flagler Estates.
My first effort is to work on the Flagler Estates article.  I have made several changes to the Flagler Estates Article.  Specifically:
1.  I deleted reference to Flagler Estates as a City.  Flagler Estates is not incorporated under the provisions of Title XII of the Florida Statutes.
2.  I changed the caption on the Deep Creek Picture to "Sixteenmile Creek" to reflect the name of the waterbody as shown on the most current USGS maps.  Sixteenmile Creek used to be called Deep Creek until 1974, when the original run of the creek was dredged by developers (Florida General Equities) to create Deep Creek.  Sixteenmile Creek discharges into Deep Creek just north of the Flagler Estates boundaries.  Old timers in the area still call it Deep Creek, but the maps denote it otherwise.
3.  I added some changes to the general description of the community.  Flagler Estates (the community) has boundaries that are generally concurrent with the Boundaries of Flagler Estates Road and Water Control District, which is a Road and Water Control District organized under Chapter 298, Florida Statutes.  The original article referred to portions of the Community lying in Flagler County. As the original article correctly stated, no homes have been built in the Flagler County portion of the District.  This portion of the District was been de-annexed in Chapter 2006-358 Laws of Florida and are no longer part of the District.  
4.  I added comment on the paved road connections to Flagler Estates.
5.  I added comment on the geography which is contained in the Flagler Estates Road and Water Control District Public Facilities Plan, which is filed with St. Johns County and with the Department or Community Affairs, Florida.
--Mkelter 17:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:North American Racing Academy

message: This is clearly a stub. I plan to expand it to an article. Please allow it to grow. Notability is several fold including the only college degree program in the US for producing jockeys.VK35 17:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texan schooner Brutus

message: That can't be a correct image of the Brutus. According to the article, she's a schooner carrying an 18lbr. swivel gun (shell gun on a swivel?) and 9 smaller guns. 
The picture looks to me like a brig, and I clearly see 7 gunports on the starboard side. 
Any comments, or should we delete the picture? BTW - I see that the picture comes from the San Jacinto monument & museum, but still...
Respice 20:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This site says that the image is of the Texas Navy Ship Wharton. Artist: Fred Toler. From "Ships of the Texas Navy; A Limited Edition Portfolio of Fine Prints"; by David B. Gracy II and Jean Carefoot; Presidial Press © 1978. I'm removing :Image:Texan_schooner_Brutus.jpg from this article. --Evb-wiki 20:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: That can't be a correct image
Talk:Texas Navy

message: In January 1836, agents purchased the sloop-of-war Austin and the brig Wharton.  How exactly is it that on 16 May 1843 the Texas Navy sloop-of-war Austin and brig Wharton engaged Mexican naval vessels when by the middle of 1837, all of the ships had been lost at sea, sunk by the Mexican Navy, run aground, captured, or sold...? meccaneer (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There were two Texas navies: the first was completely destroyed by 1838 and then a second navy was reconstituted 1839 - 1846.  Argos'Dad 15:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The USS Texas (BB-35) page reads that Texas is the flagship of the Texas Navy. I realize that Texas doesn't really have a navy, but I think some tie in from the ship's page to this page would be helpful.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 02:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Texas (BB-35) 

message: The article could be improved, in the introductory section, referring to the fates of the boats.  From the separate articles for each boat, 2 ran aground (same day & place), 1 captured, and 1 sold, none lost at sea, and none sunk by the Mexican Navy, by October of 1837.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 23:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Fates for Four Boats
Talk:Teribe language

message: Semester “Fall 2010”
“Research Methods (STA 630)”
Assignment No. 02 Marks: 20
“Patients’ attitude”
An NGO working for the welfare of the cancer patients wants to conduct a survey to measure
cancer patients’ attitude toward the doctor’s personality, behavior, competence, and prescribed
treatment, in the public hospitals of Lahore. A researcher has been hired for this purpose.
There are 10 hospitals in the city which are treating the cancer patients. Administrations of
seven famous hospitals in the city are ready to cooperate with researcher and provide him the
information about cancer patients admitted in the hospital. While the other three hospitals
refused to provide any information for some reasons. On the basis of the information provided
by 07 hospitals, he has a list of 500 cancer patients, admitted in these public hospitals of
Lahore.
The researcher decided to take a simple random sample of 150 patients for the survey. He
collected data by filling out a questionnaire from selected patients and analyzed the data to
draw conclusions.
Questions:
1. Identify the population in the given scenario? (5 Marks)
2. What is the Sampling Frame in the given Scenario? (5 Marks)
3. Identify the Sampling unit and Observation unit in the given scenario? (5 Marks)
4. What type of research is this? Descriptive, exploratory or explanatory (5 Marks)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.182.80 (talk) 06:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  assignment
Talk:Bob Wojnowski

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Albert Einstein International School of San Pedro Sula

message: Be aware of WP:COI. Snowolf (talk) CON COI -  17:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Angel (Aerosmith song)

message: ==Untitled==
This section is poorly written.  It seems to have been composed by someone who isn't quite as familiar with musical terms as he or she thinks.  The song isn't "A power ballad style" - it is written in a power ballad style.  "Electric guitar" is a far more common term than "electrical guitar."  Lastly, "The song is in major" doesn't make any sense.  Should that be: "The song is written in a major key?"  Thirtysilver (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Song Structure Section

message: This section is poorly written.  It seems to have been composed by someone who isn't quite as familiar with musical terms as he or she thinks.  The song isn't "A power ballad style" - it is written in a power ballad style.  "Electric guitar" is a far more common term than "electrical guitar."  Lastly, "The song is in major" doesn't make any sense.  Should that be: "The song is written in a major key?"  Thirtysilver (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eat the Rich (Aerosmith song)

message: It is not really clear if the belch between "Eat The Rich" and "Get A Grip" (next track on the album) was intended as the ending for the former or the beginning for the latter. It's the ending of "Eat The Rich" according to the music video for the song ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-0lAhnoDlU ) and it makes sense with the song lyrics. But on the other hand, the burp was placed at the beginning of track 3 ("Get A Grip") on the CD version of the album instead of the end of track 2 ("Eat The Rich"). Plus, there's some live footage of the band on YouTube in which Steven Tyler doesn't end "Eat The Rich" with the burp but he uses it as the beginning for the following song instead ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa1XnA427uk&t=4m35s ). Alvabass (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Belch
Talk:Girls of Summer

message: Why is this article being considered for deletion, and why is there no discussion? Scoldingmonkey 14:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because people are ignorant and wanted to delete just about every Aerosmith song article.  Don't worry, we stopped them, at least for now. Abog 01:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  consideration for deletion 

message: Who starred in the video ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.219.142.146 (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  video clip
Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 667

message: I am willing to improve this article. However, it seems like the nominator, User:Tonyf12, came across this article with "Random article" and didn't like road articles. I believe that this article is as notable as any other article on a secondary provincial or state highway, and there are many of those. I apologize in advance for any mistakes I may have made. Thank you. Ultraflame 17:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For deletion?
Talk:Pink (Aerosmith song)

message: Isn't this inaccurate?  There is a repeat of the lines 
Pink...it was love at first sight
Yeah, pink...when I turn out the light
And pink gets me high as a kite
And I think everything is going to be alright
No matter what we do tonight 
...That's a chorus.  12.162.122.6 (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it just me, or is the synopsis for this video WAY too detailed?  The description is practically a shot-by-shot breakdown of the entire video. Drpickem (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely.  The current synopsis is ridiculous. 209.90.140.72 (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 08:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Pink (song) →  – Ambiguous; see Pink (Lizzo song). 162 etc. (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 May 2024
Talk:Still Loving You

message: It is quite slow, and the guitars do not have enough weight and distortion. Seems to have a peak at its end, still is not enough.
Who ensures that this song is heavy metal, which are references about this? Come on if they want to harm the image of Wikipedia, the problem is yours.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank Rocker (talk • contribs) 21:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously. I would much rather call this song a power ballad. It simply does not have the structure of a heavy metal song. It does contain qualities of one, however, it is mainly a power ballad.Boötes (talk) 03:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This song isn't Heavy Metal
Talk:Rhygyfarch

message: It is doubtful that Rhygyfarch m. Sulien was ever bishop of St Davids. The Annales Cambriae note his father's death in 1091, and a successor, Wilfred's (Gruffydd) at 1115, who was himself succeeded by Bernard (1115 - 1148). Rhygyfarch's death is noted at 1099, but he is not stated to have succeeded his father, or to have been a bishop when he died.
--Henrywgc (talk) 23:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhygyfarch
Talk:Alpina

message: I have a 1986 BMW B/7 Alpina Turbo Vin# WBAEC810608183543 and I’m having trouble selling without proper documents.   Please advise how I can get papers that verify my Alpina is real  Thank you very much, mbbridges @aol.com 2600:1007:B067:339C:B8B0:4A4A:249:C37B (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documents
Talk:Send Me an Angel (Scorpions song)

message: Send Me an Angel was written by the Australian group Real Life in 1983. This information needs to be corrected. 68.169.141.66 (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Except for the title both songs are completely different, the Scorpions song is definitely not a cover version of the Real Life song.--SiriusB (talk) 19:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This song was not written by the Scorpions.
Talk:Wiesmann GmbH

message: Too much of this article reads like word for word copied press releases and blatant advertising.
For example:
"Project Thunderball echoes the styling of its predecessors....  Weismann is promising some juicy numbers for the Project Thunderball"
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a car magazine or manufacturer's sales brochure! 
I have removed the whole === Project Thunderball === section
95.150.59.238 (talk) 12:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant Advertising - Project Thunderball
Talk:School of Consciousness-only

message: Is there a need for this article? There is already the Consciousness-only and Yogacara article. Is there something new to be said here? --Knverma 18:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously the pages have been merged long ago, but the tags have not been removed, which I did now. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 10:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger-proposal
Talk:Miss Earth 2006

message: Pchin on Flickr has put up a huge pile of photos from Miss Earth 2006 - enough to start writing articles for half the contestants! - David Gerard (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't uploaded all of them but I put quite a few of them up last year - you can see the gallery at the bottom of the article. PageantUpdater  talk • contribs  02:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free content photos 
Talk:Miss Earth 2001

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:World War I naval ships of the Ottoman Empire

message: * Oppose It should be the other way around. We can shorten the section World War I naval ships of Turkey#The Story of Muavenet-i-Milliye and HMS Goliath here by moving some stuff to Muavenet-i Milliye, the 'main article', and removing some.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denizz (talk • contribs) 19:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muavenet-i_Milliye&curid=9573365&diff=162821375&oldid=160589005 Merger suggestion] of [[User:Mosquitoxix]] 

message: This article has to be moved to [World War I naval ships of the Ottoman Empire]. There was simply no Turkey at WWI. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up®  01:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering if you know what the longest ship used by the Ottomans in WW1 was? I have seen different things saying that a ship was longer than the Yavuz Sultan Selim? Were there any cargo ships, tankers, colliers, transport ships, floating dry docks, etc that the Ottomans had that were over 600 feet long? I read something about a very large WW1 Ottoman floating dry dock, and thanks in advance. 2601:985:477F:8E50:7423:327C:1CB:FE5 (talk) 18:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move