lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boethusians

message: On 2/23/2016, the listing of Zadok in paragraph 1 is confusing and found as Tzadok in another wiki article, this also doesn't have any citation. 
Now Paragraph 1: "...his two pupils, Tzadok[13] and Boethus..." marked as minor edit.
Reference section is foreign to me, I don't know how to add a new reference. Esp. if the existing ref are off cite linked somehow. I could try but likely would not do it the right way.
So I will put here.
[13] Maimonides, Commentary to the Mishna, Fathers 1:3
see this article for more info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigonus_of_Sokho
Esp.
"Tzadok, pupil of Antigonus and possibly founder of the Sadducees, misconstrued his teachings (the above motto) to mean that there is no afterlife.[3]"
The main reason for prompting this change is it is confusing to say Zadok if it does end up being the better choice as Zadok the High Priest is the more recognized name and not who this article is referring to.
See the High Priest here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zadok
Completely different time period, something needs to be added to make clear to the reader. i.e. last name, or location from etc.
---hope this helps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bibleuspro (talk • contribs) 03:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

message: On 9 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Boethusians for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 17:40, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
Norampx|framed|center  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.180.93.3 (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd

message: When the Talmud mentioned Menahem the Essene?--JaredMithrandir (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can this statement that Talmudic sources don't mention the Essenes be true?
Talk:Revolutionary Vol.2

message: this article is stupid.
"this song is out of control" this an encyclopedia, not amazon reviews.
this page is too POV. who are you to say industrial revolution isnt "the best song".
and since when was technique ever described as muslim!? lol i thought someone who listened to him would have more intelligence then to create a page like this.
*The song summaries shouldn't be so POV, but they should stil highlight some of the more unique accusations technique makes.  He is a self-proclaimed muslim.  Beef & Broccolli: "It's not that I don't eat pork because I'm a muslim..."  4th Branch: "A Fake church called the prophet muhammed a terrorist."
NO. hes saying he doesnt eat pork because he just doesnt like it, NOT BECAUSE HES A MUSLIM. and since when has speaking out against people who criticise islam mean that you yourself follow islam?! and in leaving the past he says he DOESNT FOLLOW RELIGION, HE DOESNT SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WRONG AND THE WRONG! the caps are for effect (works very well)
$30 says he made it himself. Project2501a 22:54, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Congrès internationaux d'architecture moderne

message: Something strange going on here. I remembered seeing this article some months ago, so was a little surprised to find it much shorter today. However the revision history doesn't go back to the earlier version - so I guess page was deleted and moved (I note that there is a redirect from Congres Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne, though that doesn't seem to have a long history either). Anyway, located a cached copy of the old page from cache of OwlPages and restored it here (since it was from Wikipedia under GNU no copyvio is involved). 80.42.43.168 18:09, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK problem solved - problem over plurals - original page was at Congrès International d'Architecture Moderne; redirecting this page to that. 80.42.43.168 18:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mar 17, 2005 - reverted to old version salvaged from OwlPages.net
Talk:Igor Karkaroff

message: Karkaroff wasn't the one that ripped out Moody's nose; it was Evan Rosier. Moody says it in the trial of Karkaroff that Harry sees in Dumbledore's pensieve.
--Canek 01:41, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moody's nose

message: Where in the books does it say that Durmstrang only accepts purebloods?
It says so (more or less) in GOF in the chapter where Malfoy is talking about Durmstrang (the one where they're on the train, I can't recall the title now).
I doubt, however that it was only pure-bloods, because Malfoy said something along the lines of "Mudblood riffraff", so it is possibly accessible to half-bloods as well.
 Lord of French Stuff 14:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durmstrang's supposedly unacceptance of non-purebloods 

message: Is this really necassary?Everyoneandeveryone 00:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succesion box 

message: Do we know for certain he's a pureblood? I can't recall it ever coming up really, and other than the fact that Durmstrang only allows in purebloods (and that Death Eaters aren't too fond of muggleborns), I don't think you can really assume he's pure. After all, he might be a halfblood like Snape. Mukkakukaku 05:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pureblooded 

message: I always assumed Durmstrang was from Bulgaria, since Krum played on their Quidditch team. CirrusHead 21:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgaria 

message: Karkaroff should be merged with Dark Wizards. The article contains lots of stuff not related to the books, or lots of speculation. Lord Opeth 19:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to attempt a general clean-up and rewriting to remove the in-universe and the OR material; I suspect it will leave a fairly short article, which should probably be merged somewhere. Magidin 15:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I have attempted a complete rewrite, along the lines of other articles (such as that for Severus Snape). Following Wikipedia's Manual of Style for writing about fiction, the article should have a real-world primary frame of reference, and should not be in-universe. Most of the article as it existed was in-universe. In addition, much of the article contained conjecture and guesses, which would original research. However, information gained from statements made by J. K. Rowling in other writings or interviews are acceptable, so feel free to add such information if you can provide a reliable source. Though I removed a lot of information, feel free to add it back provided it is directly relevant to Karkaroff and can be suitably referenced. The article also needs a pass to give chapter references, though I cannot do it right now. Finally, remember that British spelling should be sued throughout as per WikiProject Harry Potter. Thanks. Magidin 16:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite
Talk:Rickon Stark

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rickon Stark. The final result was Merge and redirect to House Stark. --Deathphoenix 18:14, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, that is 10 years ago. --Mario Payne (talk) 19:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That one is. This one, also mentioned at the top of this talk page, is more recent. Brendan Moody (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD 2005

message: Could you explain this? "removal of content" is not a valid reason to revert when I had already provided a policy-based explanation for why I had removed it. Specifically, the content is WP:IRRELEVANT: comments by the actor who plays this character about a different character belong in our Art Parkinson article or at List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters#Osha.
I know you and I have our differences, but you should at least behave professionally: it really looks like you only reverted this edit because I was the one who made it, and I can't think of any other possible explanation.
Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why did you remove that, that text was about how the different actor/character helped Art Parkinson play Rickon Stark, so yes, it does belong in this article. - AffeL (talk) 10:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: How did a fictional character help the actor play a different character? That makes no sense. And the point about how Parkinson found it "very easy to work off" Tena was really easy to miss. The rest was all about Tena as an actress and her portrayal of Osha. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  How it did help the actor is a question that Art Parkinson only can answer. You can remove the unrelated stuff about Tena, I won't mind that. But I do not agree with remoing the stuff about Tena helping Parkinson on playing Rickon. - AffeL (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "removal of content"? 

message: This is fluff that I've removed from the lead, as it doesn't even mention the character and can't seriously be argued to be "lead worthy", or even really encyclopaedic—it's fluff.  Unsurprisingly, the editwarrior AffeL has restored it without making any attempt to justify it, along with all his other editwarring. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry about that. You can go ahead and remove that part, I have no problem with that. - AffeL (talk) 10:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluff
Talk:Joan Baez

message: I got to this page via a random click (via the Steve Jobs 'Think Different' page, if you must know).  It seems to me that the idea that the most recent picture is the best one to use is a mistake if the person concerned is quite old, and one of the pictures of a younger Joan Baez should be used for the description box instead. --Brian Josephson (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a more recent photo is better for the lead, as is the case with many other bios. I have restored the 2016 photograph that was previously in the article. Although the 1973 photograph is good quality, I think this image is also good quality and should not have been removed, unless anyone disagrees with me about this. —Vigilant Cosmic Penguin (talk | contribs) 03:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change main picture 

message: Why is there no mention of her extensive work with Caesar Chavez? 24.46.240.48 (talk) 14:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grapes
Talk:Space Marine (Warhammer 40,000)

message: The picture at the top of the article is from the first edition of Warhammer 40K (1987). Maybe it should be updated with a more recent picture, from 9th (2020) or 10th (2023) editions of the game? M@R10FYREFLOWER 22:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update picture
Talk:Jamie Foxx

message: Mr. Foxx performs piano as well as vocals. He should be referred to as "actor, comedian, and musician." 207.119.183.19 (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  actor, comedian, and singer 

message: Change "On April 12, 2023, Foxx's daughter, Corinne, announced that he had been hospitalized" to "On April 12, 2023, Foxx's daughter Corinne announced that he had been hospitalized" 2603:7081:3D:1013:E803:8E01:EA26:EFB7 (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: The current sentence works fine. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2023 

message: Missing "r" in "the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor fo his performance". 
Thank you. 2A02:8071:D82:D200:CD34:519E:9E5C:CFE3 (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been fixed. Thanks for the catch. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  typo
Talk:Li River

message: Is Lijiang River 100 km long or 437 km long? Shouldn't the word "the" in "Along the 100 km..." be "a" ?
Shouldn't it be the "Li River", since "Jiang" is the Chinese word for "river"?
:My understanding is that "Li River" can refer to either Lishui River or Lijiang River.  The Li River page is a disambiguation page. --Kralizec! 20:55, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: River Li is not per convention. See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Chinese)#Topographical.
The Li River article is a disambig page. This article following the above convention, is now Li River, Guangxi. This is more clear and distinct in line with current naming standards.
Visik (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Li River, Guangxi 
Talk:Canboulay riots

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Canboulay Riots. The final result was Keep the non-copyvio version. --Deathphoenix 18:49, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voted on for deletion 
Talk:Graham's law

message: There is no mention of Graham at all in Cardwell (supra) and this relationship is one I associate with other people.
Also, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography has:
:In 1831 Graham read a paper to the Royal Society of Edinburgh in which he showed that, at constant pressure, the rate of diffusion of a gas was inversely proportional to the square root of its density. For this discovery he won the society's Keith prize; the principle has become known as ‘Graham's law’.
-which is a different kettle of fish.
I will amend unless I hear some authoritative account from elsewhere. Cutler 13:27, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
===References===
*Michael Stanley, ‘Graham, Thomas (1805-1869)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 <http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/11224, accessed 14 July 2005>
Ok everyone, this has been sitting here for a long time so I'm just going to completely change it and remove the "disputed" marker.  I've got a 1998 Zumdahl textbook, a Baron's 6th edition SAT II Chemistry prep book, and the Complete Idiot's guide to Chemistry here, and they all pretty much agree, so I'm just going to go with it. Edit as appropriate : )Lepidoptera 16:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page right? 

message: *Michael Stanley, ‘Graham, Thomas (1805-1869)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 <http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/11224, accessed 14 July 2005>
Ok everyone, this has been sitting here for a long time so I'm just going to completely change it and remove the "disputed" marker.  I've got a 1998 Zumdahl textbook, a Baron's 6th edition SAT II Chemistry prep book, and the Complete Idiot's guide to Chemistry here, and they all pretty much agree, so I'm just going to go with it. Edit as appropriate : )Lepidoptera 16:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Graham's Law refers to both diffusion and effusion (according to Hicks, 'Comprehensive Chemistry'). The article should mention both without changing the title. MP   (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diffusion and effusion 

message: Needs to be carefully pruned to remove some repetition, which is making the article unnecessarily difficult to understand. Ehrenkater (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition
Talk:Liaison/Translation from French

message: The below is the text of fr:Liaison (linguistique). I am starting a translation of it; others are of course welcome to help. The ultimate goal is to be able either to substitute this text for the current text of Liaison, or to merge the two into one text at Liaison, since (for understandable reasons) this article gives way more information than Liaison. Ruakh 19:13, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh, look who I found! I'll see if I can get my two cents in the translation (my French is very very basic, but written French I understand, mostly). I just mentioned liaison in Rioplatense Spanish#Phonology (s-aspiration), since it looks like the same is happening as it does in French, though I'm no sure if simple resyllabification is not the correct answer. I think the details about French liaison should be left to a separate article. Also, the profusion of technical Greek terms in the intro paragraphs may be a bit scary for the reader... --Pablo D. Flores 13:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joe Ossanna

message: People who knew Joe at Multics and at Bell Labs are available as sources for further information. Perhaps one of them could be enticed into collaborating on publishing a biography? Perhaps this has already happened. Where is it? The online material I've found in a brief search is contradictory, incomplete or ancient. Some of it relies entirely on the current Wikipedia article. Snezzy (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info, please?
Talk:Gina

message: I established this page to write about the Canaanite town, but it occurs to me that this word is quite generic (and is a popular name) so it might make more sense to make it a disambig page. Please feel free to add links to other "Gina" articles. --Briangotts 19:22, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did not see this in this article. 2601:642:4400:9F00:C0D4:D20C:72A:AFFA (talk) 14:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang for Vagina?
Talk:Z-DNA

message: An image of Z-DNA would be nice here, perhaps even a picture comparing all three.
*Done. I created these images with a fine piece of software in Linux. Feel free to make comments. Thorwald 05:55, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Will some expert kindly provide a source for the sentence quoted below, so that I can reach my goal of paring down the Citation Needed references on the following page? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Articles_with_unsourced_statements&from=Z
While no definitive biological significance of Z-DNA has been found, it is commonly believed to provide torsional strain relief while DNA transcription occurs.[citation needed]
Sincerely, GeorgeLouis 06:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed. 

message: Other users tried to use your table with the information of the different DNA-Isoforms in the German Wikipedia but I noticed that there were quite big differences to the values that Voet et al: Fundamentals of Biochemistry (2006) gives. So it would be nice to know where you have the data from before we quote them. I did not find any specific citations. greetings --hroest 14:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That table has been hanging around on the article for aaages... i have no idea who the original author for it was. While it would be nice to find the original source i would say it would be worthwhile to update the table with a reliable current reference anyway. - Zephyris Talk 15:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table

message: The following statement in History is a little confusing...
"Z-DNA was the first crystal structure of a DNA molecule to be solved (see: x-ray crystallography). It was solved by Alexander Rich and co-workers in 1979 at MIT.[1] "
I've always believed (possibly erroneously) that X-ray crystallography was a more general term. If this is the case, then wouldn't Watson and Crick's analysis of Franklin's X-ray diffraction of a DNA crystal in the 50's be "the first crystal structure of a DNA molecule to be solved"? PS I'm not trying to be smart here, I just want clarification. PRH969 14:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: X-ray diffraction vs crystallography

message: I commented out a sentence that was added today by another user (in the "History" section). The sentence in question reads as follows: "Left handed DNA was discovered by Robert Wells and Charles Cantor in 1970 when they observed that a repeating polymer of d(I-C)-d(I-C) displays an inverted circular dichroism spectrum compared with other sequences". The link the user pointed to (Well & Cantor) was really just a suggestion that this polymer could adopt a left-handed conformation under specific conditions (based on the X-ray diffraction pattern and CD spectra). However, much later, Sutherland and Griffin (1983) found that the polymer actually adopted an unusual non-B-DNA right-handed configuration (called "D-DNA"), not a left-handed configuration. Note also that the idea of a left-handed DNA helix had been around for a long time prior to its discovery. --Thorwald (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovery of Z-DNA
Talk:M&M's

message: "The introduction of the blue M&M to Australia was promoted by the Australian Football League's Carlton Football Club, which wore sky-blue colored guernseys. . ." Looks like possible vandalism as I don't imagine the players wore cows. Since it's another country with perhaps different words used for some items, I did not edit the word to jerseys. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guernsey's ? 

message: M&Ms we’re not the first candy if this type, please refer to Smarties* A United Kingdom chocolate candy which was the first of its kind to have the sugary exterior shell associated with M&Ms 195.180.32.192 (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The lede already says they may have been copied from Smarties.  What change are you asking for?  RudolfRed (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 May 2024
Talk:Shoot, shovel, and shut up

message: Does this really have encyclopedic potential? Or does it belong in Wiktionary? -- Jmabel | Talk 19:33, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
*It's now an article about silently killing and disposing of unwanted animals, rather than about the phrase itself. Kappa 12:20, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic? 

message: In accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (verbs), should we rename the article Shooting, shoveling, and shutting up? Rad Racer 16:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that "shoveling" and "shovelling" appear to be equally correct spellings, although "shoveling" is more common on the google search. Rad Racer 16:50, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions 

message: The citation linking to the article about the Canadian premier's speech is no longer valid; clicking on it produces a page saying the requested article cannot be found. Should this be relocated or removed?
--Light Dragon 01:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date citation 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested.  Dekimasuよ! 13:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Shooting, shoveling, and shutting up →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. The only sources I can find that use the current title are WP:MIRRORs. Paradoctor (talk) 11:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 January 2024
Talk:Green River (soft drink)

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.158.109.28  (talk • contribs) 
===Various===
July 5,2 2023
The article mentioned Green River was only sold in Seattle in the 1990s and implied until 2011. I grew up in the West Chicago suburbs, we had Green River available at least from 2001 onward. Only a handful of places sold it, but it was viewed with pride by community members that it was available.
---  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.141.14.6 (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: (?)

message: July 5,2 2023
The article mentioned Green River was only sold in Seattle in the 1990s and implied until 2011. I grew up in the West Chicago suburbs, we had Green River available at least from 2001 onward. Only a handful of places sold it, but it was viewed with pride by community members that it was available.
---  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.141.14.6 (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Various

message: Most of the (promotional) histories I found of Green River say that it began being bottled in Chicago due to Prohibition but don't explicitly claim it was invented there.  Those dates don't match. I suspect Green River was actually invented by the Sweetwater Brewery of Green River, Wyoming (note the location!) which also bottled it but the drink wasn't popularized until later by Edelweiss of Chicago. The sources don't quite say that though so I just mentioned both breweries in the History section. RevelationDirect (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins in Chicago vs. Wyoming

message: I thought the Sinatra anecdote perfectly suitable for mentioning but I guess it wasn't really popular culture.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:32, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinatra