Template talk:Psychiatry

message: I think we should discuss it. Here's some suggestions:  (we could eventually make a version without the captions) (we could eventually cut the cord) (we could eventually cut the cord) (too complex?) (yeesh, and it's a nontransparent JPEG) (too boring?) (it's broken so maybe it's not a good example?) (too incomprehensible?) (eventually remove captions and/or rotate) (eventually remove captions) --Ysangkok 17:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly opposing to any of the proposed images. They all refers to brain, not to psyche. These image could be used to tag topics about diagnostic image or to tag neuroscience topics, but not psychiatric topic. The burled of saying what psychiatry is and what should so be an image to describe it, is to the psychiatrist, of course. -- 82.54.154.105 19:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Suggestions

message: I just mashed together the public domain svgs on psi and caduceus. The caduceus should not be confused with the  Rod Of Asclepius which is the actual symbol of the medical profession. According to the Psychiatry article the word came from the greek "spirit physician" so I think this image is appropriate but I am not sure.  This was my first svg i've ever made and the first image I've ulpoaded so please fix it if you notice that I did something wrong. Is this appropriate? -- Diletante 19:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah probably best. EverSince 12:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you guys mind if I uses this on the mental health template? Chupper 16:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I certainly don't -- Diletante 18:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed. I realized this a few weeks after Diletante uploaded that.  I tried to do some image work putting a Rod of Asclepius on the psi, but I wasn't happy with the results.  Would anyone be willing to switch back to Ysangkok's image 9 for the template? It seemed to have the most support... Chupper 19:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another image suggestion 

message: Hello. I wonder if you all could agree to remove "Psych navs" from the bottom of this template. I'm terribly sorry but it makes no sense to me at all. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Bold and removed it. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove bottom navigation 

message: navboxes should not have redlinks. its a guide to existing articles. if we need these articles written, then write them, then consider adding them to the box. I will remove them and add the removed names to requested articles, at the psychiatry project and the main list.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: redlinks

message: I don't get why we wouldn't include a link to the primary contrarian points from both anti psych to psych and from psych to anti psych.
Isn't this to create echo chambers? Isn't spreading knowledge what wikipedia is about?
Pauloroboto (talk) 16:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit that I reverted changed the *title* of the template, which already did contain a link to the article on Anti-psychiatry. Plus, you gave no explanation for why you did that. Dhtwiki (talk) 13:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why cant we have my edition which might aid spreading knowledge from one school of thought to another?