lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CORE

message: Due to the large number of uses of the word "core", including several that use all caps, I think this needs to be redirected to Core again. Rhindle The Red 18:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Because, as JHunterJ mentioned and I seconded, there are many internal links to the Congress.  Also, if you do a Google search on "Central Organization For Railway Electrification" you get 23 hits, for "Congress of Racial Equality" there's 139000. -Nklatt 13:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Little Flower Academy

message: Can someone please add the infobox for this article?
Done, though its still missing some information (eg. principal) TCB007 09:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  INfobox 

message: Err... not sure if this has been brought up with WikiVancouver already, but can someone clean up this page?  Thanks. 
ShivanFist 03:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Just wondering how I'd ever source this. Students are, each year, discouraged from writing provincial exams for certain courses where there is a possibility that their performance will negatively affect the overall performance of the graduating class. It is a hardly ethical practice, and would appear to be an important point to make when putting the school's relatively high esteem in perspective.
ReneeLung 19:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skewing results for Fraser Institute ranking 
Talk:David Wechsler

message: I have expanded this page to the point where I don't think it qualifies as a stub. I also took out the following sentence: "David Wechsler is also the name of a Civil Servant, who has been Chief Executive of the London Borough of Croydon since 1987." I figure that if the modern Mr. Wechsler is important enough to be in Wikipedia, someone will create a seperate article for him. My apologies to anyone who may know the British Mr. Wechsler.--Cassmus 08:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two David Wechslers

message: I'm going to suggest boosting Wechslers's importance assessment up to Mid. In my opinion, developing one of the best-known intelligence tests (and having it named after you) merits more than a Low assessment, which is reserved for more obscure topics. What does everyone else think? —Cswrye 22:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 20:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the newest version of the only source cited in this article at hand, and quite a few other sources, so I hope to expand this article soon. All of you are welcome to suggest further sources. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 17:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing 
Talk:Ovule

message: I rewrote the article a little bit. I hope it's clearer now. - tameeria 20:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs better explanation of technical details

message: The pacific hering, clupea pallasi, has eggs with micropyles.
Is the morphology of the egg comparable to what is described here for plant ovules?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.175.8.13 (talk) 12:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Micropyle of animal eggs

message: We need diagrams to explain things like placentation models such as those shown in many textbooks. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 22:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: The article states that "In gymnosperms, the megagametophyte consists of around 2000 nuclei," but there is no reference for this statistic and I have been unable to corroborate this purported fact using primary sources. Does anyone know if this is true? I would really like to know how many nuclei are present. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Southhillwill (talk • contribs) 23:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Nuclei in Gymnosperm Megagametophyte
Talk:Lawbringers

message: Please let me know if I've added images correctly and appropriately, with copyright status, etc.  Some of the pages on editing here are a bit confusing.  But, I'm excited to expand on all these Crossgen artciles! Eauxry 08:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anti-abortion violence

message: I think it would be good in Wikipedia an article named "Pro-abortion violence".
88.1.36.234 (talk) 20:34, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @88.1.36.234 I second this. Wikipedia is biased in this regard. Jorge A. Domínguez Agüero (talk) 00:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

text: I guess you are free to create one if you think it is needed. There is a draft for it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pro-abortion_rights_violence . Sijambo (talk) 09:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sijambo these are the only edits by the ip and account. Doug Weller talk 10:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Try Conservapedia. "pro-abortion" isn't a thing. Jibal (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pro abortion is certainly a thing. It's supporting the ability to terminate a pregnancy and end a human life. 107.190.100.141 (talk) 02:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Pro abortion rights is a thing, and it's not the same as pro abortion. Even those who support that right don't love the idea of abortion. They support that right as a sometimes necessary evil. So be careful not to confuse the two. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other article 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Does not preclude a new section or article being written about what the nominator wants, just that the idea to convert this specific article from one scope to another is not having any traction. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Anti-abortion violence →  – Expand topical scope to include all abortion-related violence. Current title refers to motivation rather than targets. A generalized title enables us to document abortion-related violence regardless of specific motives, targets, or ideology. Conforms with title format of existing articles, Abortion and mental health, as well as numerous "X and violence" topics. Elizium23 (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

text: "Abortion and violence" would be a title for a different article, with a much wider scope than this. Anti-abortion violence would be part of it, but...it is a notable topic on its own, and warrants a separate article. I'm not sure this request falls within the scope of RM. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 02:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree with . There's no reason to move this and allow scope creep, when one could create Abortion and violence as a standalone article in its own right. This move also seems at odds with Draft:Pro-abortion rights violence, which I can see  is also contributing to, as if this article had its scope widened it would also encompass that draft's content. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 August 2022
Talk:Annihilation (Forgotten Realms novel)

message: Come on Gavin, do you even read the articles you tag? Someone just today added a reference to this book being on the NY Times Best Seller list, and you tag it with ? -Drilnoth (talk) 13:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article at WP:BK begins with "This page documents an English Wikipedia notability guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense and the occasional exception."  I suggested using sales figures as a way to prove notability, it currently being discussed here.  To say that having a small number of newspaper or magazine reviewers mention a poorly selling book makes it notable, just because these few people liked it, while at the same time stating that another book that was not reviewed by them, but which had millions of fans that bought it, is not notable, I believe violates the "common sense" part of at the top of the notability guidelines.  The article is justified, I vote Keep and let it be. Dream Focus (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck?
Talk:Skierbieszów

message: I have removed this stament because there were two lines. It's not the place to discuss, which one was correct. If you know that the local people were Ukrainians, you may include your data.
Xx236 08:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is situated in the west wake of the [[Curzon line]].  

message: I updated the population number to 5,800 as it was outdated.
--Euge246 (talk) 05:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this refers to the gmina? The 2006 population of the entire gmina was 5600, so unlikely that the village itself would now be 5800.--Kotniski (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The population number
Talk:Shlomo Sternberg

message: Ironically, as everyone sufficiently interested in math to be reading this page probably already knows, since mathematicians love to gossip about their colleagues, while one might think that symplectic geometry might be free of controversy, Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko is author of a well known book who is also an accomplished artist (somewhat like William Blake, only more chaotic) and a well known pseudohistory crank.  I didn't mention this in the article because I really would not want to suggest even in a stub that the most interesting aspect of Sternberg's career has been his involvement in debunking the so-called "bible codes".  ---CH 08:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fomenko
Talk:Gamera 2: Attack of Legion

message: The English translation of the Japanese title needs to be included in this article.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: English translation of Japanese title
Talk:Gamera vs. Viras

message: It seems as though Gamera can survive with a gaping hole in his stomach. Watch the movie, you'll know what I mean.
Gamera is a cyborg -- not a living turtle.  So -- yes, he can.  Chesspride@aol.com 216.144.161.51 (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: It Seems
Talk:Guerneville, California

message: I changed the comments on chess to refer to the permanent chess tables, rather than the fact that people play chess at them, since that seems more noteworthy, a clearer indication that playing chess in the plaza is a part of the town's culture. I'm really surprised there's not an entry for Johnson's Beach yet, but I'm not qualified to create it. With no disrespect to the Harris clan, I'm wondering if the entire world really needs to know the name of the family that sells sno-cones? I didn't want to change it unless other people fine it unnecessary. JonathanPenton 09:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While providing good information, this article reads very much like a narrative and could be improved by the use of formal tone. WildCowboy 16:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article 
Talk:Killing Mr. Griffin

message: Wow. I don't know if this should be a subsection on the main page, but the Kindle edition made some noticeable changes, adding in quotes about iPhones(location 2689) and Google (1006). Should we add this info? I KNOW this wasn't in the original version. I'm not sure about recent editions.174.252.168.245 (talk) 14:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed this too on the audiobook edition recently and am looking into it.  It should be mentioned here if I can find a source to verify it (and provide an explanation). --LibraryGurl (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kindle edition differences 

message: Should this even be mentioned here?  It may be similar, but nothing seems to suggest any connection between the two works.  --LibraryGurl (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching Mrs. Tingle 

message: I thought I would ask this here, since her name has been changed from Kathy to Cathy and back a couple times. I checked, and the first edition of the book refers to her as Kathy Griffin, whereas the updated edition from 2010 refers to her as Cathy Griffin. Which one should we use? Or should we leave out her first name altogether and just refer to her as Mrs. Griffin? Fearstreetsaga (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The spelling change should probably be discussed in the Background section. I'm inclined to use the original spelling in the plot summary and character section, but only because of preference, not any policy-related reason. I've posted a link on the Novels project talk page. Hopefully someone there can give us some guidance. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't look like anyone else is going to comment. I changed her name back and added a note to explain this difference. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 19:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kathy or Cathy?
Talk:Ellen Dougherty

message: I've edited and destubbed this article. I've removed "January 2006, 104 years to the day, her Gt. Gt. Gt Niece was photographed at the graveside of Ellen." as non-verifiable. I've left the reference to the location of her medal without verifying it myself (I did at least find an exhibition reference to the existence of a medal).--Mereda 09:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article about Ethel Bedford-Fenwick, she was the first Registered Nurse. Can anyone clarify this discrepancy. --Ezeu 00:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  discrepancy 

message: As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to low per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale.  If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NURSE]] priority review
Talk:Battle of Sông Bé

message: The battle of Song Be is covered by several first person accounts in the book, "Returning Fire, in the Beginning" by Colonel Pete Booth.
I'd suggest reading it, adding a citation, and a few corrections.
For example, B57s, F100s, and at least one L19 were airborne along with the UH-1B gunships and slicks.
I'm not sure F4 Phantoms were there. CriticalChance (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First person biographies
Talk:Second Battle of the Corunna Road

message: If there is a link to a commander in the infobox, there should be a link to the person in the main body of the article. The lead paragraph should sum up the article without going into great detail. For the article to be up to B-class standard, the lead should be expanded to at least one paragraph. The Aftermath section has only one sentence. You might want to add a brief description of the next action. Djmaschek (talk) 01:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, further to Djmaschek's review, I've taken a quick look. One thing I notice is that there is a discrepancy in the dates between the lead and the infobox. The lead says that the battle began 13 December, but the infobox says 16 December. I don't have the sources to check which is correct, but when you get a chance, can you please make this consistent with whatever the sources say? If there is a discrepancy in the sources, then could probably be noted in the article. Keep up the good work. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: If this is the second battle when did the first battle take place and why does it not have an article? GS3 (talk) 21:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the First Battle of the Corunna road article?
Talk:Tom Hendricks

message: The Zine Hall of Fame started by Tom Hendricks and Musea is now featured at
http://zinewiki.com/index.php?title=Category:Musea_Zine_Hall_of_Fame
Musea Musea 17:47, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Musea Zine Hall of Fame on zinewiki 

message: How do I reference the url to the Musea Zine Hall of fame on zinewiki at
http://zinewiki.com/index.php?title=Musea_Zine_Hall_of_Fame Musea 17:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I reference url 

message: When I encountered the article today, it seemed to me to clearly fail the WP notability guidelines. Then I noticed that it was nominated for deletion because of non-notability and that the decision was keep. There were two remarkable themes in comments by those who voted to keep: (1) They believed that article actually does fail the formal notability requirements, but (2) they would allow the article to remain if the subject Tom Hendricks would stop editing it. If the article does fail the notability requirements then it should be deleted, regardless of the quality of writing and other features. The fact it was created by Tom Hendricks and at first mainly edited by him makes it rather typical of what are referred to in WP as vanity articles. It appears that Tom Hendricks continues to edit the article as user:musea. I'd appreciate if someone could explain, in terms of WP policy, why we should keep the article. Nesbit 01:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My argument was that the formal notability guidelines have to be flexible for outsider artists and people whose notability spans different areas.  It's certainly been an issue for me in other areas where notability guidelines are vague, like art-related topics.  I don't have time to argue this all over again, and I don't care about this article *that* much.  I say "weak keep", so do what you want. Paul Slocum 21:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability concerns again
Talk:Types of bowlers in cricket

message: Shoaib Akhtar is not mentioned in the fast bowling category; he has delivered the fastest recorded ball in cricketing history, and that is not just a rumor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by One Time (talk • contribs) 21:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly Shoaib Akhtar is mentioned, secondly it's a pretty strong 'rumour' that Jeff Thomson went past 100 mph and he probably did it multiple times as well, I don't see why you should criticise Thommo simply because speed guns weren't prevalent at the time. It's also good to remember that the guns are unreliable, the one at Lord's this summer has 'tuned' bowlers up with Broad clocked at 92 mph against the Windies and Bresnan a fast-medium bowler, with emphasis on medium, in the high 80s consistently. Similar anomalies were reported during the Ashes Test. --Jpeeling (talk) 22:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No one's criticising Thomson, but it's not reasonable to label him as the 'fastest ever' without proof. Several other bowlers have been labelled the fastest ever, including Harold Larwood, Michael Holding, Shaun Tait, and Shoaib Akhtar. Only Tait and Akhtar have speeds recorded with modern technology, but even then there is doubt because the ICC don't oversee speed gun calibration. It's usually done by the TV station or the local ground.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.249.227 (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoaib Akhtar
Talk:Momanpur, Attock

message: I cleaned the page and added the required, proved and available content and citations.John Gell (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning

message: So is it Momen Pur or Momen Pure? jni 10:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:OLM (studio)

message: The japanese is titled オー・エル・エム, or "OLM"... should this be moved to OLM if there is nothing else that TLA can stand for?? -Aknorals 10:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What series/movies have they done other than Poke`mon?  I understand they did the anime version of Berserk Berserk (manga). -Aknorals 10:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of...

message: Toshiba Vestron Video (東芝ヴェストロンビデオ Tōshiba vu~esutoronbideo) is a Japanese Home Video Company Founded in 1984 by Masahiro Ōga in Minato, Tokyo, Japan.--69.209.0.192 (talk) 07:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: no that company doesn't exist i don't know why you did that either i don't know why any admin noticed that LeronJomes (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toshiba Vestron Video 

message: I noticed that Beyblade Burst QuadDrive (aka Beyblade Burst DB) is listed as being done by Team Abe on the English page but in the JP page it's listed as being done by Team Masuda. Anyone know which is right? SpecificName (talk) 22:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Info Between the English Page and JP Page 

message: Do not add Hikita or Masada to the list of divisions until the studio has credited themselves under Team Hikita/Team Masada in a production they produced or until they produce a title by themselves. CrunchyPixels (talk) 02:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to Apothecary Diaries getting a second season, I've decided to add Sumitomo to the list of producers. CrunchyPixels (talk) 00:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Hikita/Masada Addition

message: Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t they produce or animate the “Good Morning” Muisc video? And shouldn’t that be included in the “original net/video animations?172.59.191.27 (talk) 20:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graduation Kanye West album music video
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The golden age of hip hop

message: PennyGWoods, I've been away for a while not arguing on Wikipedia and the debate has long ended, so I'll just answer whatever crap you managed to spew and hope you read it.
"Okay, then when was the golden age of hip-hop?"
Already covered this.
"your little b-boys are going to keep your little toy"
Hip-hop is a young man's sport. Don't be bitter.
""HEY! COME VOTE!" (as evidenced by the user pages). "
Politicians do the same thing. Do you bitch about them?
"You're irrelevant to me."
Misanthrope much?
"Get the fuck outta here with your gay ass e-thuggin shit."
Have you heard of irony yet?
"Be sure to write an article about how Jay-Z is the greatest rapper ever, since MTV says so."
Has the bug up your ass been liberated yet?
"if me pointing out that your people broke policy bothers you so much,"
There's a "Stop Snitching" movement, don't you know?
You're a bitter, vengeful dumbass. Next time, try and argue like a human being, not like an emotionally crippled moron. MOD 16:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellany