lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bramwell (TV series)

message: Bramwell, West Virginia.
A disambiguation page is needed, as well as a page about the town.
—
A disambiguation page exists. I'll move the name derivation to it, as well as this comment on a town in the US. I'd be pretty sure there will be other such towns too.
A Karley 21:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Now that the entire series has been released properly on dvd (in the UK) I very much hope someone will give a proper breakdown of the episodes. I cannot find anyplace online where the series is properly documented, even IMDb and PBS. IMDb can't decide if it's a 4-season series or a bunch of minis and a couple of movies. PBS showed the episodes out of order and in groups of made-up 'seasons'. Thanks. Derekbd (talk) 04:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  an episode guide
Talk:Jahn Teigen

message: i have no idea when he retired however. please figure it out and update the article. the article however still lists him as active which is wrong. 84.212.111.156 (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  he is technically retired 
Talk:Blast Tyrant

message: The line "Who's that riding? John the Revelator. Who's that riding?" is quoted from the Son house song "John the Revelator" in Profits of Doom, is that worth a mention? Vicissitudo (talk) 13:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Son House

message: Would saying that this is the greatest rock album of all time recorded by anyone ever be POV? I think it's been proven using science. MattShepherd 17:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless you can cite your sources. *rimshot*--Robbie 07:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV question 
Talk:Amtgard

message: According to the Amtgard rules I just read, a glancing blow or a simple touch is not enough to cause damage...the blow must be a solid hit.  Applejuicefool 17:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Touch?

message: I removed the Afd notice because discussion was concerning the merge, not deletion.  I was being bold, so if my action is out-of-line, then please revert my edit.  Thanks. --HResearcher 09:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, its better to follow process... although the AFD itself should have been fully closed as it was never a valid AFD. Merging doesn't require an AFD, although if its likely to be contested, it should be discussed on the article talk page (ie here) - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 14:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afd 

message: It seems to me that to even attempt to list all current chapters of Amtgard here is beyond the scope of the entry, as well as largely futile.  Such a listing would make the page much less usable.  Furthermore, chapters (shires in particular) come and go all the time.  Keeping the entry at all up-to-date would be a large (and neverending) undertaking. Furthermore, the Amtgard Atlas and the AmtWiki are both better individual resources for that kind of info.  To list anything less than a Grand Duchy or a Principality here seems a vanity entry at best.
I made the call to remove the shire listed, and adjust the Chapters section a little accordingly. --Thorprime  —Preceding comment was added at 00:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapters 

message: This article could do with some independent sources, it seems to be sourced entirely from Amtgard self-publications. It would be worthwhile hunting down newspaper articles, etc, about the group and citing them, in case notability is ever called into question. I don't doubt that Amtgard is notable, but right now there isn't any evidence of it. Ryan Paddy (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid that's true of news coverage of most things (look at news coverage of science), although obscure pastimes like larp probably suffer particularly. Best to just cite the most accurate news articles that can be found. Or at least mention that the group has been covered by XYZ major news outlets, without quoting the inaccurate coverage that may have been given. Ryan Paddy (talk) 05:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent sources
Template talk:User WikiProject Cryptography

message: Nice work, and yes, "member is a member" was pure idiocy, sorry about that! ;-) — Matt Crypto 17:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike Selinker suggested changing the category from :Category:WikiProject Cryptography members -> :Category:WikiProject Cryptography participants since he thinks that is a better name (more welcoming to new users and doesn't imply that "membership" application is needed etc) and would make naming consistent across projects. I agree on that so I changed the category and also the text in the box to "participant in" instead of "member of". --David Göthberg 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion etc
Talk:Number 1 Single

message: The episode summaries appear to have been copied word for word from the E! website. Leaving aside the POV nature of the summaries themeselves, the fact that they are copyrighted content means they have to go. From E!'s Terms of Use:
"E! Online prohibits the use, copying, distribution, transmission, display, performance and exploitation in any form or manner of any and all copyrighted or trademarked content on this web site (which includes, without limitation, any and all articles, text, graphics, logos, advertisements, video clips, music clips, still photographs and software)(collectively, "Content") without E! Online's express prior written consent. Further, the computer code that E! Online creates to generate its web site pages is protected by copyright and any copying or adapting of such code is strictly prohibited."
If Wikipedia has obtained permission to use the episode recaps, then re-insert them, but for now, I'm removing them.--RicardoC 21:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode Summaries

message: The scene in the first episode showing Lisa walking around in a thong appears to be becoming a minor Internet meme, with clips starting to appear. Should this be mentioned at all? 24.71.223.140 17:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How to handle the thong incident?

message: Any chance of getting screenshots for the episodes?  I have several, but not all.  Anyone record all the eps?  tiZom(2¢) 03:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lisa Loeb posted links to all eight episodes on her web site. Plain Text (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 23:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ish ishwar

message: If this doesn't pass, it would be quite a shame. I see that at least 8 of the oppose votes are based on lack of edit summaries, an issue Ish ishwar has addressed already! I just don't see how you can oppose based on edit summaries at this point. Not only did he write a full paragraph about how he's going to use them in the future and knows they're important, he added a javascript thing to force edit summaries! What more can he do?--Alhutch 17:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bureaucrats don't just count, they weigh 'votes'; so I would expect the closing 'crat to take into account the fact that Ish has adressed the issue promptly. Note that some editors don't check back after adding their vote, in which case they wouldn't have seen Ish's response; placing a note on their talk might help. — mark ✎ 18:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

text: well, it's "no big deal" after all — as the page says. peace – ishwar  (speak) 22:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm optimistic about the outcome.--Alhutch 20:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: edit summary issue
Talk:Health and environmental effects of depleted uranium

message: ;1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.
;2. Editors adding new information into an article should cite a reputable source for that information, otherwise it may be removed by any editor.
;3. The obligation to provide a reputable source is on editors wishing to include information, and on those seeking to remove it.
This is posted to serve notice that as per the agreement at depleted uranium I will defend this article from any attempt to remove content that is properly referenced and verifiable as such. --DV8 2XL 17:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not 'my show' I posted the above to remind others that may edit here that someone will be watching and reverting any attempts to remove properly sourced statements. There is much in this topic that is contentious and the old Depleted uranium suffered several edit wars as one side or the other on this issue sought to get the upper hand. We all finaly came to an agreement and keeping this article to the rules of content that are inforce was part of it. --DV8 2XL 01:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The policy

message: Correct me if I am wrong, but I was under the impression that the FOIA was considered original research. Ten Dead Chickens 20:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The FOIAR abstract is published by the Navy monthly; this one ended up in their September, 2005 abstract. --James S. 22:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This still does not establish its relevance. Ten Dead Chickens 12:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion of FOIA

message: Check out what GNC is selling: http://www.drugstore.com/qxp88904_333181_sespider/gnc/liquid_multi_colloidal_minerals.htm
They don't seem to be alone.  I'm sure that it has as much uranium in it as a pinch of average topsoil, but the fact that they're able to market it as a health suppliment shows that Congress and the FDA are asleep at the wheel. Dr U 10:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some fuel for the fire

message: I consider this voluntary compromise pre-mediation settlement spin-off article to have failed, and will be responding to points raised here on Talk:Depleted uranium. I would welcome a return to mediation, as I have stated in my demurrer to TDC's recent arbitration request. --James S. 21:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Returning to [[Talk:Depleted uranium]] 

message: The mediation page is here: Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Depleted uranium and related articles --James S. 04:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation
Talk:Feeling B

message: Is there any way to get a cd or something of them somewhere?  Because I really want to hear them.
65.13.187.51 17:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Burning down the Haus by Tim Mohr (ISBN 978-1616208431) has quite a bit about Feeling B. If someone wants to expand this, it would be a very solid source. - Jmabel | Talk 02:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested reference
Talk:William H. Pickle

message: This may be a copyvio from . I have contacted the webmaster to enquire if the content is in the public domain. Johnleemk | Talk 17:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Unless specifically noted otherwise, content on the site is in the public domain." Johnleemk | Talk 05:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ohio

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Apple (automobile)#Requested move 17 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Apple (automobile)#Requested move 17 April 2024]]
Talk:Wine Olympics

message: }}
The articles about wines seem greatly biased... I also don't considered the French wines to be best. But this is a bit too faar don't you think? It seems a promotion of California wines. And it is in every article about wines... --Pedro 17:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I've removed the following sentence which was added by IP 203.5.70.1:
The original Wine Olympics occurred in Cameroon. The festivities had to be halted when Hiau Roach, was drinking a Pinot Noir and accidentally swallowed the cork. After this occurrence the "bottle" event was cancelled due to health and safety concerns.
It seems extrememly unlikely to me that someone could 'accidentally swallow a cork', but if someone knows better, please re-add it, citing suitable reference!  sjwk (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited and implausible reference
Template talk:FApages

message: I'm intentionally trying to keep the number of pages listed here small, so as to avoid confusing newbies with too many featured article related pages. 
* I've removed the link to 'featured articles in other languages' - after looking at that pages history, I conclude that it's basically a ghost town, with less than a half-dozen substantive edits in January. Raul654 17:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal

message: The shortcut to Wikipedia:Today's featured article/Long range requests has been removed from this page until consensus is reached that we want to have long-term requests. For discussion, please see Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/Long range requests. Thanks, Sarsaparilla (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:LRR]]

message: Re:this - sorry for the edit summary, that was firefox's autocomplete. The calender messes up the display of this template. Raul654 (talk) 16:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit summary

message: re  Gee, one would think that a page which has been around since 2005 with contributions from a dozen different editors  would be given a bit more weight and consideration than "somebody's personal advice, no idea where that page came from". -- œ™ 06:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen it before, it's out of date, and as far as I know, never enjoyed consensus.  There are dozens of such pages.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Featured article advice]]

message: WP:Featured articles is designated via  (and by its language and link from the Main Page) as a reader-facing page. As such, it really shouldn't have editor-only links such as Script to track TFA recent changes or Mentoring for FAC, or at the least those links should be collapsed/hidden. This is part of the larger problem we have separating reader-facing vs. editor-facing areas, as well as the severe bias we have toward designing the encyclopedia around the needs of editors rather than readers.  talk 21:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We would need a separate version of the FA template for just that page. (t · c) buidhe 22:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mockup at  (t · c) buidhe 23:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , , Template:FCpages exists, for Wikipedia:Featured content, perhaps it could be used for the FA, FL, FT and FP pages? Aza24 (talk) 07:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. At featured articles, I do think you should include a link to FAC, FAR, and TFA because otherwise it's left a mystery to readers where the featured articles come from. (t · c) buidhe 09:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reader-facing issues
Talk:GAZ-M20 Pobeda

message: The article ignores completely the fact, that Pobeda was built on production lines of Opel Kapitän (and thus heavily based on), brought to the Soviet Union as war reparations from Germany after the war. -91.32.200.162 15:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Opel Kapitän is in article :de:Pobeda (Auto), so it is possible to include this info to english one. Suwatest 13:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Can you prove that Pobeda was built on production lines of Opel Kapitän, and that it was heavily based on it? First drawings of Pobeda appeared in 1944, before war's end. It had modern unitized body construction, not old-style body-on-frame, like Opel and like most American cars of that time. It did not have separate wings like most cars of that time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikus (talk • contribs) 00:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opel Kapitän
Talk:Infiniti G20

message: I have gone back to the WikiProject page and asked to reopen discussion on the article, hopefully in a more civilized manner this time around.  If you would like to follow the discussion, it is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles#Infiniti_G20_-_input_requested - please discuss there rather than on the Talk page here. Thefultonhow (talk) 18:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A year later, more discussion
Talk:Gretna, Dumfries and Galloway

message: NOTE: Gretna should not redirect to Gretna Green as the two places are different, albeit near to each other Gretnagod 17:43, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It could probably expand the section about marriages, i.e. it has held the most in one day in UK i think, would need to ref that to be sure.  Or am i confused with gretna green.(Monkeymanman (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Marriages take place at Gretna Green, not Gretna. Pyrotec (talk) 10:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cripps Mission

message: The article title uses an apostrophe, but the article text does not.  Which is correct?  Since the mission is always referred to with the definite article (the), my guess would be that it should be Cripps mission, not Cripps' mission, just like we would talk about the Churchill mission (if there was one), not the Churchill's mission—especially since Cripps' is, strictly speaking, incorrect English (the possessive of Cripps in English is Cripps's, unless we're discussing more than one Cripp), though it's a common enough mistake, and may already have been common in the 1940s for all I know, that that on its own wouldn't convince me which name is correct.  Binabik80 12:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: So good explaination 2409:40D2:100B:A1E1:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cripps mission 

message: Paper 39.58.132.174 (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cripps proposal
Talk:Psyche (band)

message: Ghostchild has said that he wrote the history information, which is also here. --Fang Aili 17:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

message: :Not to stirr up problems, but why write a huge article on one website and then dump a copy of it here? I suggest making an article at one or the other, or possibly doing a sumarry of it on Wikipedia while linking to a more detailed article elsewhere. Otherwise you'll have copyright problems like this. Even though Ghostchild says he/she wrote the original and should be allowed to put it here, it doesn't mean that's completely okay with Wiki policy to do something like that.  Does Ghostchild own that gothic website? If not, is it okay with the site owners to place the info here as well? Gotta check these things out. Cyberia23 19:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs a band photo, not just the photo of Huss. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Per discussion at AN :3 F4U (they/it) 20:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (March 2023)
Talk:Mariam-uz-Zamani

message: There will be many imperial consorts. According to the Badayuni account, one of the imperial wives became pregnant, and then he mentioned that the Emperor left his "Empress" in Sikhri. There will be only one empress or queen. Unlike in movies or novels, not everyone can be called an empress or a queen. The mosque inscription has Queen Maryam Zamani, and the Badayuni account also addresses her as Empress. So I feel it is better to call her an "empress consort" than an "imperial consort," because there will be many imperial consorts. ContinentalXtra (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empress Consort 

message: Please look into The Rahimi.. If you can remove the sources in which can only edited in source mode , I will reconstruct the page completely... I'm getting trouble in editing the sources.. ContinentalXtra (talk) 13:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the main editor.. 

message: Please help me out in arranging sources properly in Rahimi page.. ContinentalXtra (talk) 13:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to mail editor.. 

message: I was able to edit only 50 percent of the page today. I'm yet to edit or add 2 more sections to The Rahimi Page. So please don't create SFN templates now itself. After completion of the edit, I will inform you as soon as possible, and by tomorrow I will reconstruct the page completely. Please kindly look at the page and try to remove the repetitive content on the page in the edited version and make necessary changes if necessary. ContinentalXtra (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for the main editor.. 

message: Her name was Jodha Bai... however she was given name after her marriage but till her death she attained her original name as Jodha Bai and this was approved by Akbar as well... Americans are wrongly depicting the history and facts... 2405:201:6029:27:1570:2D8C:2145:D074 (talk) 07:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name is wrong...
Talk:Go opening theory

message: This article should be merged with Go opening strategy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.179.227 (talk) 02:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Paul Scally

message: "He has been branded with the nickname "The Hobbit" by many in the game."
I have just removed the above from the end of the article. As a Gillingham fan I have never heard him referred to him by this nickname (and neither has Google), and would ask for some evidence it is true before it is re-added. --Lawlore 17:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scally the Hobbit

message: Is there anything really encyclopaedic about this?  Someone anonymously made an unspecified accusation which he retracted, Scally reacted angrily.  No date, no meaningful information.  I would delete, but I'll stay my hand for a little while. Kevin McE (talk) 13:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete away, I doubt it could be sourced anyway.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patang 57 "incident" 
Talk:Yucaipa, California

message: Originally a retirement community, Yucaipa (an Indian name meaning red earth) later degenerated as young families moved in and their children began using too much methamphetamine. The smart ones escaped.
The above seems strongly POV so I have taken the liberty of removing it--4.232.252.164 17:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (null header) 

message: Is this POV?  Any reviews/empirical evidence to support the statement?
Just asking...
Mark Sublette 05:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Best Tasting Apples
Talk:Augusto B. Leguía

message: This page is good but has no citations what so ever. To the writers of this page (namely Messhermit and Dynamax} please add citations to the page. Fine work though.-Jersey Devil Jersey Devil 17:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations?