Talk:Charles II Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua and Montferrat

message: I corrected an error: in this page we arw speaking of Charles II of Mantua, not the third. His father never became duke, so he never received a number of succession. As source, we can see a coin minted in 1649 : we can read CAROLUS II DEO GRATIA DUX MANTUAE ET MONTIS FERRATI ET CASALIS. --Cusio (talk) 14:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  II, not III 

message: We need reliable sources for category claims.  It may well be that such sources are indeed available and you can list them in the article - but if not, then who is saying that these people fit the bill?  Just deciding that you think they fit the description is Original Research - and that's not allowed here.  I need to see a few reliable little blue number in each categorisation that links to a reference document that can be examined to confirm Basic Academic Rigour. 
Categories that make allegations about sexuality – such as "closeted homosexuals" or "people suspected to be gay" – are not acceptable under any circumstances. If such a category is created, will be immediately deleted.
We need reliable sources for category claims.  It may well be that such sources are indeed available and you can list them in the article - but if not, then who is saying that these people fit the bill?  Just deciding that you think they fit the description is Original Research - and that's not allowed here.  I need to see a few reliable little blue number in each categorisation that links to a reference document that can be examined to confirm Basic Academic rigour 
:Most people that are listed in the misleading LGBT categorization can also be connected with the following:
:-Heteroflexibility -is a form of a sexual orientation or situational sexual behavior characterized by minimal homosexual activity despite a primarily heterosexual sexual :orientation that is considered to distinguish it from bisexuality. 
:-Pansexual-  A person who is fluid in sexual orientation and/or gender or sex identity.
:-Polyamory- is the practice of having multiple open, honest love relationships.
:-Affectional orientation - To holders of this view, one's orientation is defined by whom one is predisposed to fall in love with, whether or not one desires that person sexually
:-MSM- are male persons who engage in sexual activity with members of the same sex, regardless of how they identify themselves; many men choose not to (or cannot for other reasons) accept sexual identities of homosexual or bisexual.
:-Situational sexual behaviour is sexual behavior of a kind that is different from that which the person normally exhibits, due to a social environment that in :some way permits, encourages, or compels those acts.
:Many people change their sexual behavior depending on the situation or at different points in their life.Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E., Hunter, J., & Braun, L. (2006, February). Sexual identity development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: Consistency and change over time. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 46–58. Retrieved February 8, 2011. For example, men and women in a university may engage in bisexual activities, but only in that environment. Experimentation of this sort is more common among adolescents (or just after), both male and female. Some colloquialisms for this trend include "heteroflexible",  "BUG" (Bisexual Until Graduation), or "LUG" (Lesbian Until Graduation).See for instance "Campus Lesbians Step Into Unfamiliar Light" New York Times, June 5, 1993 
:Sexual orientation
:A report from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health states, "For some people, sexual orientation is continuous and fixed throughout their lives. For others, sexual orientation may be fluid and change over time". "There . . . [was, as of 1995,] essentially no research on the longitudinal stability of sexual orientation over the adult life span. . . . [I]t [was] . . . still an unanswered question whether . . . [the] measure [of "the complex components of sexual orientation as differentiated from other aspects of sexual identity at one point in time"] will predict future behavior or orientation. Certainly, it [was] . . . not a good predictor of past behavior and self-identity, given the developmental process common to most gay men and lesbians (i.e., denial of homosexual interests and heterosexual experimentation prior to the coming-out process)."Gonsiorek, John C., Randall L Sell, & James D. Weinrich, Definition and Measurement of Sexual Orientation (feature), in Suicide & Life – Threatening Behavior (N.Y.: Guilford (ISSN 03630234)), vol. 25 (prob Suppl), 1995, p. 40 or 40 ff. (prob. pp. 40–51) ((ProQuest (ProQuest document ID 7736731) (Text Only)) http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=2&did=7736731&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1269113734&clientId=4273 (Full Text), as accessed Mar. 20, 2010 (alternative document URL http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=7736731&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=4273&RQT=309&VName=PQD)) (prob. also in PsycINFO) (abstract <http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&fuseaction=showUIDAbstract&uid=1996-16078-001>, as accessed Mar. 17, 2010, or http://doi.apa.org/getuid.cfm?uid=1996-16078-001).
:Kinsey scale
:Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale, attempts to describe a person's sexual history or episodes of his or her sexual activity at a given time. Ituses a scale from 0, meaning exclusively heterosexual, to 6, meaning exclusively homosexual. 
WP:CAT/R#Sexuality For a dead person, there must be a verified consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate.
For example, while some sources have claimed that William Shakespeare was homosexual or bisexual, there is not a sufficient consensus among scholars to support categorising him as such. Similarly, a living person who is caught in a gay prostitution scandal, but continues to assert their heterosexuality, can not be categorised as gay. 
Categories that make allegations about sexuality – such as "closeted homosexuals" or "people suspected to be gay" – are not acceptable under any circumstances. If such a category is created, it should be immediately depopulated and deleted. Note that as similar categories of this type have actually been attempted in the past, they may be speedily deleted (as a G4) and do not require another debate at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. 
: Please observe the following
: WP:SCICON The statement that all or most scholars hold a certain view requires a reliable source. Without it, opinions should be identified as those of particular, named sources.  Editors should avoid original research especially with regard to making blanket statements based on novel syntheses of disparate material.
: WP:FRINGE -A theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article
: WP:EXCEPTIONAL - Exceptional claims require exceptional sources
: WP:CHERRY fact picking.  Instead of finding a balanced set of information about the subject,  a coatrack goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias. An appropriate response to a coatrack article is to  be bold and trim off excessive biased content
 Sexual categorisation in lack of clear irrefutable evidence, confession is dishonest and from a historical point of view abhorrently misleading.  Pgarret (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding sexual orientation category to this biography may be a WP violation