lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Souleymane Mamam

message: Article currently reads: "...regulations mean that it is not possible for young non-EU footballers to work in the United Kingdom." However the Home Office web page which explains the work permit issue in regards to footballers has no age qualification listed. What's more, younger non-EU players are on the books with league appearances for other clubs, like Denílson and Johann Smith. Can someone clarify why Mamam (who signed for United at 18) is too young acquire a work permit for the EPL? --JonBradbury 10:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work Permit
Talk:Soulivong Savang

message: What makes him a "pretender to the throne" and not King? Is this simply by decree of the Communist government? It would seem to me that if he's the grandson of the former king and there's no one else on the throne, then he's the legitimate heir and therefore king, and not a pretender. This should perhaps be more explicitly explained in the article. Thank you. LordAmeth 15:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity

message: Lao history is complicated by the fact that three (3) kingdoms once existed-Luang Phrabang, Champasak and Viang Chan. Before suzerainty to Siam each of these kingdoms had their own royal families. He is simply one heir from one family. sammlea 11 September 2007.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammlea (talk • contribs) 03:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, alright. Thank you. LordAmeth 21:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Transparency

message: Wouldn't calling Soulivong Savang "king" be inaccurate? He is clearly not king, but a pretender. Or perhaps "King of the RLGE" would be most accurate? KetchupSalt (talk) 08:13, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I went with the latter. KetchupSalt (talk) 13:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "King of Laos"
Talk:Grown & Sexy

message: Why is the genre for this album "crunk" or "hip hop". It has no rapping on it and most of the songs have very smooth and mellow instrumentation, it's not crunk. 2600:1700:3BAD:A210:7421:844B:B720:6274 (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crunk , hip hop?
Talk:Spagna

message: Ivana Spagna was born in 1956.
Don't 1954 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.43.239.241 (talk • contribs) 
:Wikipedia:Cite your sources andy 16:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1954 is the date in the biography on her official website as well as being the title of her new album! Crisso (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year

message: Why the article is named Spagna is very curious...
And to provide consistency with the Italian language article, this should be changed to IVANA SPAGNA. 2604:3D09:927F:E900:81FC:3CC7:7938:BAA0 (talk) 05:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change article name to IVANA SPAGNA
Talk:Saugeen First Nation

message: Due to a dispute regarding the appropriateness of a DX media list, I have submitted this matter for an RfC. My position remains that proper Wikipedia format does not include a random list of media from other communities that happen to be receivable in an area; we are only supposed to list media that originate in a given community. Miishgoos, on the other hand, maintains that since Saugeen First Nation is a small community with very little else to do, the hobby of DXing is a significant part of the area's culture and therefore needs to be reflected here. Comments? Bearcat 17:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. If a community does not have media outlet within the community but is served extensively by that media, it should be listed, along with the media's locations.  Typically, this is the local newspaper or the local radio station in near-by communities.  Instead of listing all the available regional radio and TV stations and all the newspaper the community can get, instead mention where other available media originate.  To that fashion, maybe DXing should stay, but instead of listing each and every stations that can be received, instead list the typical locations of stations that comes in from time to time. CJLippert 00:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Bearcat - any list should be limited to media that originate in the community.  If the hobby of DXing is a significant part of the area's culture, and that fact can be sourced, then it certainly can be mentioned in the article, without any need to list any or all of the distant signals that might be picked up.  Skeezix1000 11:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

text: If DXing is a notable activity of the community, please find a reliable source that states this. A list of all received stations would be completely inappropriate, however. The article needs sources generally, and commercial advertisements are inappropriate (I have removed several of these). Hgilbert 14:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC

message: This article has multiple entire sections without any citations. Jackson Hamilton (talk) 22:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Citations
Talk:Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (album)

message: Surely the album was first released in 1979 as Showcase?? Gwladys24 (talk) 20:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showcase? 

message: Wishing this too-brief entry had more information on the title track (release date, chart tracking, cover versions, possible inspiration) or there was a Jamaican Language Wikipedia which might further elucidate the mystery. Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  12” Single
Talk:Guide to Better Living

message: If anyone knows the story behind "DCX3" please add details 202.134.253.55 (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Spencer Bailey

message: This person is not notable except for being a crash survivor, and this article does not contain any notable information that isn't covered in the crash article. This should redirect to the crash article. Cmprince 04:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: notability?

message: :File:Spencer Bailey.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 04:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Spencer Bailey.jpg
Talk:Gunnin' for Glory

message: :Image:96601.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:96601.jpg
Talk:Spencer G. Lucas

message: According to Nature News, a controversy has broken out about Mr. Lucas. His accusers have claimed that he and others have taken credit work that is not actually his. See this article for more info. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An anonymous user keeps deleting the paragraph about this controversy. Please put the paragraph back or explain yourself. I'll wait a few days. Martin Rundkvist (talk) 07:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "It is an essential part of professional ethics that scientists must not name species if they know another scientist is in the process of working up material for publication." has been deleted by our spinmaster, as unnecessary for the Wikipedia reader to know. It will be hard to stabilize an honest, declarative article, I surmise. --Wetman (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a hidden text, and I'm not the spinmeister (as a sidenote, I played with Wikiscanner to see if it was an obvious candidate editing from work, but no connection to either the NMMNHS, U of NM, or U of CO (Denver)).  Otherwise, I would have deleted the whole thing, like they did before.  I don't see why we have to spell that out; it reads like a lecture. If you'd prefer it back, feel free to remove the . J. Spencer (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claiming work that is not his 

message: It's important that readers can see the text of the SVP's final report. The link is broken at present. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  link 
Talk:Spencer Hawes

message: Does anyone have a photo that they've personally taken that they can upload?UrsulaMajora (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free Use Picture 
Talk:H.N.I.C. (Prodigy album)

message: The "Background" section reads more like a review of the album than it does an encyclopedic description of the songs.
Phrases like these have neutrality issues:
• "This isn't an only conscious album though. Prodigy strikes again with hardcore lyrics. Prodigy can therefore be described as a conscious gangster."
• "Prodigy lets you know that he is the boss" 
The article might also need some more fixing up to be more encyclopedic.
 SomePersona (talk) 21:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view
Talk:Spencer Haywood

message: Since I have received no response from the www.lakersplayers.org web site administrator and they have made no attempts to attribute their source, I am noting here that the site
http://www.lakersplayers.org/spencer-haywood.php
has plagiarized this particular wikipedia article. Myasuda 14:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism by www.lakersplayers.org

message: What court case is the article referring to?
There is no previous mention earlier in the article to clarify the referring paragraph currently in the WP article.
66.193.5.226 (talk) 21:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Court

message: Wasn't Haywood dismissed from the Lakers just before they won the championship? Which was the whole reason why he tried to hire a hitman on Paul Westhead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:8B83:4860:58D:190C:D4F2:3950 (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haywood dismissed from Lakers before championship 

message: Is the fact that he circumcised himself worthy of including in the main article? I was thinking under personal. 2600:1700:9B10:1300:209F:DF59:6342:9B0 (talk) 22:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circumcision
Talk:University of Holy Cross

message: Just noticed that much of Our Lady of Holy Cross College is too close to text found in http://www.olhcc.edu/about/glance.shtml; it might be a copyright violation.  Need to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardamon (talk • contribs) 05:26, 23 August 2006
:This has been done. Cardamon 07:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: like the website

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that this article not only include a "Controversies" section (as opposed to integrating that material into the broader context of the institution's entire history) but also that it include information about allegations of racism.  The only source supporting these allegations is a press release written by the central figure in the disputes.  This is clearly placing undue weight on this poor source and the consistent edit warring that the unregistered editor has engaged in to include this information also raises potential conflict-of-interest issues and questions about bias. ElKevbo (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Now semi-protected following my request at WP:RFPP. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 07:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of controversies supported only by press release written by involved person
Talk:Spencer Krug

message: * In an attempt to reduce the clutter that Krug's massive "gallery" discography section created, I moved the pictorial section to its own page (Spencer Krug discography). (Fulmerg 21:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:So Far Away (Dire Straits song)

message: I deleted the summary, which was likely incorrect: among other assertions, it claimed the story was told from "multiple viewpoints" (not clear by reading the lyrics; it might as well be a single narrator), or claiming in one of the viewpoints his girlfriend/wife died (wtf?) or left him (wtf!?).
My own take is that the song is just about a guy who for unspecified reasons is away from his love, but anything beyond that can't be guessed from the lyrics, and no summary is better than an incorrect one. 200.89.148.92 01:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary likely incorrect; deleted it
Talk:Srđan Dragojević

message: He did not direct "Mi nismo andjeli 3"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.34.25 (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Srđan Todorović

message: I'm surprised nobody seems to discuss the death of Srđan Todorović's son at age 3 - a very traumatic experience, I am sure, leaving him probably quite angry. i can well understand his wanting to strike out at everything in existence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.143.69.153 (talk) 13:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Srinivasaraghavan Venkataraghavan

message: FYI for anyone looking for a different "Venkat": "Venkat" is also the pen name of blogger and pundit  Venkatesh Rao of the blog Ribbonfarm ( http://www.ribbonfarm.com/ ). If we ever create an article on that author or blog, we'll presumably want to crate a disamb page for the nickname. 
-- 186.221.135.185 (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Venkat]] is also the nickname of author Venkatesh Rao of the blog Ribbonfarm
Talk:Stacey Dash

message: 111818a, regarding this, this and this, I repeat that this source (from blackpast.org) is not a WP:Reliable source. Read WP:Reliable source.  The Variety source seen (here) passes our WP:Reliable source guideline. It is not a tabloid. And even if blackpast.org was WP:Reliable, it not mentioning "Bajan" doesn't mean that she isn't of Bajan descent. 
Do not WP:Edit war on this matter. Discuss. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of Bajan descent
Talk:TI-Nspire series

message: A new Software has been released (see https://education.ti.com/en/product-resources/whats-new)--212.117.115.122 (talk) 10:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information 

message: Rather than just straight up grief the OS versions section of this article, I figure I'd try to get other people to talk about removing it. I think as it currently stands, the section of the article is neither good as prose or a list. If you look at the TI-84 Plus Series "Software" section, it doesn't list every specific of the TI operating system that has ever existed and I think that section should be a model for how we write this section ... If no one talks about this for like a month, I'll go ahead and just remove it anyways and replace it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prezi2 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  OS Versions Removal? 

message: This article is 40% taller than it needs to be because of all the images. They should be compiled in a gallery or something. Hextor26 (talk) 01:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images
Talk:Stacey Nelkin

message: It would be useful to state that Stacey is an American actress (if that is the case) at the outset.Prustage 00:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this is now done.75.61.136.242 (talk) 04:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

text: I concur but it would also be useful to list her Jew. I will update accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GegenIsrael (talk • contribs) 05:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My Jew edit was removed. I reposted it with citation.GegenIsrael (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia no longer allows the mentioning of the alleged, suspected, or known religious affiliation of actors. 5Q5 (talk) 15:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, I mean in the intro line, "American actor/actress" is enough information and the accepted standard over "Christian/Jewish/Muslim American actor/actress. The actor's religious affiliation can be stated elsewhere if the source is highly credible. In Nelkin's case, the source is an article she herself wrote in which she described herself as a "Jew." 5Q5 (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Stacy Arthur

message: I have removed references to Stacy Arthur as a pageant participant... no Stacy appears on the winners list of either Miss Ohio USA (if she competed at Miss USA) or Miss Ohio (if she competed at Miss America) for 1990.  The article seemed conflicted about which pageant title she held/which pageant she participated in.  -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 06:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pageant participant 

message: Update to include that Stacy Arthur passed away in 2019. 65.184.80.195 (talk) 04:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Stacy Arthur according to Playboy Murders Series is 2019.
Talk:Andrzej Szpilman

message: Wasn't there already an article on him? It might be with diacritical marks on the last name. --Mathew5000 05:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the deletion log, previous version was deleted, presumably for copyvio. --Mathew5000 19:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added a reference needed tag because this article appears to be completely devoid of any references whatsoever, except the subject's own foreword to his father's book, which is about as un-independent as something can get. Judging by the text of the article, he ought to be notable, and something, somewhere, ought to have been written about him independently, but my quick Google search turned up only a Guardian article about an argument between him and media about his father's relationship with the Nazis, which didn't seem useful or relevant. His father is clearly very notable, if nothing else because of the film. I do not speak Polish, so I don't think I'm well-placed to find references on Andrzej. If they don't exist, the article shouldn't, but I don't want to start PRODing when I can't do my own Before. Elemimele (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References??
Talk:Stacy Lattisaw

message: Is anything known about her personal life? Apparently she is married. What is her husband's name? Does she have any children? Is anything known about what she has been doing since she retired from pop music in the 1990s? 2603:800C:3A40:6400:48AE:B175:DD5C:CFB2 (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: She is clearly married. Her husband's name is Kevin Jackson, children are Kayla Jackson and Kevin Jackson Jr., but none of this doesn’t seem to be mentioned. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is anything known about her personal life?
Talk:Stacy Long

message: He definately plays for Leatherhead FC. I watched him two days ago playing. Hes had 2 games and 2 goals http://www.leatherheadfootballclub.co.uk/news/squad-news-1275167.html
WSidneyS (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Stickee (talk) 03:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2014 

message: Change the SITE TITLE and SITE URL for REFERENCE No. 77: 
| title = Stevenage Borough 2009-10: Results, rollcall and league table
| url = http://www.boroguide.co.uk/seasons/season.php?ID=0910
The current URL for this reference point is now dead. 
BoroGuide Pete (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done nyuszika7h (talk) 20:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 July 2016 
Talk:Stacy Schiff

message: The article as it currently stands reads like a press release, or promotion lifted from Schiff's website. I removed one or two of the gushier words. The adulations quoted should be sourced.
11 Arlington (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs better citations

message: On July 24th, 2006, Schiff wrote a New Yorker essay on wikipedia itself entitled Know It All. This very Stacy Schiff wikipedia article was created the very same day, which can be verified on history tab above. According to Timothy Noah, she was apparently not notable by wikipedia standards, despite the Guggenheim fellowship and Pulitzer prize. The essay and this article are now featured in the Wikiproject to counter systemic bias.Jaredscribe (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "Know It All" article in the [[New Yorker]]
Talk:Stan Bahnsen

message: Bahnsen gave up the losing home run to Mike Schmidt of the Philadelphia Phillies in the deciding game of the Montreal Expos' first-ever playoff series. This should be included in the article as a notable event in his career, but I can't find a reference. Can someone help? DQweny (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable event
Talk:Stan Goff

message: What question is there on neutrality here? Yes, the article could use some rewriting and editing, but I don't see anything here about the piece not following NPOV. If anyone has criticisms of the article, please let everyone else know what they are.--Pinko1977 08:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the criticism? 

message: I tracert'd the IP that gave the bulk of this article, and it leads to his hometown.
I have no problem with this, since Goff's biography is a little elusive in the first place. Neither am I accusing him of writing it with much of a bias (if he wrote it at all).
But this is a very messy article, and I'm hesitant to hyper-edit willy-nilly on someone's bio. He deserves a more clean and concise entry.
Just want to let you all know (and I apologize for being a bit underhanded with the tracert, but I had a hunch. It wasn't my intention.)
:It's been sufficiently wiki-ized that this shouldn't be a problem anymore. Nitcomb 10:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  autobio 

message: I am cleaning up this article. Bmedley Sutler 07:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: I'm new to wikipedia and not sure how to add sources.  But here is a link to the article he wrote for counterpunch:
http://www.counterpunch.org/goff11142003.html
I would argue that Stan Goff and his writings are very significant to veterans in the anti-war movement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefox226G (talk • contribs) 22:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where in the article do you think it should go? Bonewah (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources