lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Johann Rall

message: This page needs to be combined with the Johann Rall page as they are the same person. If I knew how to I would do this. ````
===Was Rall "fragged"?===
Since the American muskets were soaking wet and unable to fire,there is a clear possibility that Rall was the victim of "friendly fire," shot by his own men, either by accident or on purpose. Das Baz 17:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since the American muskets were soaking wet and unable to fire,there is a clear possibility that Rall was the victim of "friendly fire," shot by his own men, either by accident or on purpose. Das Baz 17:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Rall "fragged"?

message: Alternate spelling, seen at the Barracks Museum, Trenton, NJ is Rahl - User: Leonard G. via IP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.130.195 (talk) 20:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Rahl or Rall?
Talk:Whitefield, New Hampshire

message: Thanks for the fine additions, Hugh_Manatee, but the Waumbeck Hotel and cottages were (and cottages still are) in Jefferson, not Whitefield.  The postcard image appears to be looking northwest along the Meadows Road (Rt 115A) toward Mt Starr King. What we now call U.S. Highway 2 runs past the front of the cottages. Lupinelawyer 21:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waumbeck not in Whitefield 

message: Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Whitefield CDP article with this article. --Ken Gallager (talk) 20:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: All of the early-1900s postcard images in the Geography section seem unnecessary. They don't seem to add anything to the article and take up quite a bit of space.  I've scoured the relevant style guides for images and I can't find any specific rules about this so I'm curious about what the community thinks. Thanks! Pugchump (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:GALLERY says fairly clearly that image galleries such as the one in this article should not just be a repository of available images for an article's subject. I have seen people remove galleries for such a reason. Personally, I don't see it in this case as being obtrusive in the article, but I will defer to other editors' opinions. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the last two images because they don't seem to be related to their respective sections at all.  They appear to be filler that doesn't contribute much to the article.  I feel that the gallery is also not exactly necessary for the article but I'll also defer to other editors' opinions on that matter.  Pugchump (talk) 22:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images?
Talk:List of mass panic cases

message: I removed the Miracle of the Sun due to WP:NPOV concerns. The article itself, nor any of the sources describe this as a confirmed case of mass hysteria. Scorpions13256 (talk) 03:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Haven't checked how long it has been on the page, but removing it is definitely the right thing to do. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  It has been in the article for about two years. Scorpions13256 (talk) 03:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking that up. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miracle of the Sun 

message: Hi all, I'm working on adding a few lines about the 2023 Musoli incident. IntegrityForever (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of 2023 Musoli outbreak
Talk:War grave

message: I question the accuracy of the statement The increased mobility of troops and accuracy of weapons means friendly fire more of a risk now than in the past. Surely the only difference is that in recent times it has made more public?
Also The use of vehicles and aircraft and the need to transport and use dangerous equipment and materials increases the risk of accidental death. is questionable. Lots of wooden warships (the Vasa and the Mary Rose being famous examples) were surely far less seaworthy than modern ships and there were many casualties in WWI from the handling of poor quality explosives. 
When did any culture first define War graves as opposed to just the sites of battles?--JBellis 22:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Historcal perspective

message: Should the article make an distinction between sections of ordinary cementaries where fallen are buried and "field" graves, commonly simple ones with perhaps the helmet on top and such (as the one in the picture). I assume these should be separated. Scoo 09:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 7 years too late (hopefully it won't be 7 years until someone replies to this) but there really should be a distinction between places like the cemetery at Normandy or to a lesser extent Arlington, although Arlington wasn't all during active duty and in a short time span. Cat-fivetc  ---- 05:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Field burial versus section of a cementary

message: I think this article would be improved with some amplication of the different approachs to war graves.  For example, in the U.S. the general philosophy is that fallen soldiers should, if possible, be brought home and buried on American soil.  By contrast, the British tend to believe that dead soliders should lie where they fell.  I can't really speak for other countries.  Would someone with a broader knowledge base care to take a shot? --Legis (talk - contribs) 13:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural differences and war graves
Talk:Project Twilight

message: Start Class:
* The article contains a useful picture or graphic
* There are multiple links to websites with more info on the topic
* There is one subheading which fully treats an element of the topic - the cast section and a useful info box 
Importance Scale:
Mid - While the story is notable within Doctor Who field it is unknown outside of this--Amxitsa (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality Assessment
Talk:Ken Griffey Jr.

message: There's a sentence in the lede that reads Although popular with fans around the league, Griffey was unable to shake reports of his petulant demeanor throughout his major league baseball (sic) career. This seems problematic on a few levels. 
* Three articles are cited as the source for this claim. This is usually a sign that an editor is engaging in WP:SYNTHESIS, collecting sources to support a point of view, and that seems to be the case here. Two columns that mention, secondhand and without attribution, that he's described as "petulant" by other writers, and one that calls him "sometimes petulant".
* How does one "shake" news reports of "petulant demeanor"? How do you verify one being able to shake or not shaking reports? 
* It's a really weird point to bring up in the second paragraph of the lede
I think there's a point to be made about the contrast between Griffey's polished persona and the way he rubbed some members of the media and the old baseball establishment the wrong way. But neither the phrasing nor the placement is doing it here. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "unable to shake reports of his petulant demeanor"
Talk:The Living Soap

message: In its present state, most of this article of this article appears to consist of editorial commentary about the show, rather than an objective description. –Ringbang 22:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, "The Living Soap attracted the wrong kind of controversy ..." what's that mean. Hardly an objective comment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.129.88 (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Gant

message: If his birth last name is Gonzalez, is he Latino?  Cuban?  He's from Florida.  jcm 2/21/8  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chumley41 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Latino?

message: CLW, While I don't feel the biography that I wrote needed to be changed, I also know that I am not an editor here, and so accept the fact that I have to leave your changes as posted. However, I would appreciate it if you would leave the mythgarden, (spelled with a lowercase, m) information posted in his biography. If you don't like the way I wrote it, please change it to what you deem is more acceptable for this site. 
Abisel
A Wikipedia article holds a different standard then a biography on a fansite or portals like IMDB. So I cleaned this up a bit Anxa (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: |status = none
Considering the two photos shown here, which is the better for the infobox? Choice #1 is the current infobox photo, choice #2 is being proposed. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image RfC 

message: ====Choice #1====
====Choice #2====
*Support Choice #1 is not optimal as it shows the article subject only in profile and is blurry.  Choice #2 is not as current, however, it is a clear photo and shows the actor's entire face. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Choices

message: *Support Choice #1 is not optimal as it shows the article subject only in profile and is blurry.  Choice #2 is not as current, however, it is a clear photo and shows the actor's entire face. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice #2

message: Hi, 
am curious why this top banner has been there for four years?
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. 
Can it be removed and who can do that? Mirth1220 (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag is there because this article has a history of being edited by editors who only edit this article, some of whom have disclosed a conflict of interest with the subject of the article (see links at the top of this talk page). It could be removed if neutral editors agreed that the article is now free of non-neutral or promotional content.  you are another editor who has only edited this article - have you read the conflict of interest guidelines and are you able to disclose if you do or do not have a relevant connection to the subject? Thanks Melcous (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: actually, i also edited run dmc recently. i had also done so years ago but the change was taken out.  Mirth1220 (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: also the content i added to both run c and robert gant is neutral. with run dmc it lists something from king of rock as the definition of dmc and with gant, added two groups he performed in. what’s non-neutral about that? Mirth1220 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header at top of wiki page
Talk:Whitey's Ice Cream

message: This article appears to have been authored by an employee of the company.  Its neutrality should be called into question.
notyouravgjoe  11:55  11/16/05
: The Sweet Success section was totally POV so I removed it, but there are still some other sections that could do with some work. NSR (talk) 11:29, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?

message: When I was visiting a Hy-vee in Lincoln, Nebraska, I saw a freezer end cap with Whitey's Ice Cream in it, so therefor, I am updating the article to reflect this as it states they only ship in a 100 mile radius. Who knows if Whitey's can be found at other Hy-vee's in North/South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Missouri. If you are from any of those states and know, please report here so we can update the article accordingly. I cannot seem to find a source for this on their website (I checked their grocery distribution section under locations), but this is 100% true. Any person who lives in Lincoln, NE, and shops at Hy-vee can vouch for me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moline1 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitey's in Lincoln, Nebraska hy-vee's
Talk:Fire Pro Wrestling

message: At least it is for most of the games. A few did seperate Pro and Wrestling, but the bulk of the games have it as one word on the box/title screen/etc. I suggest someone make changes to the articles to reflect that. 12.75.31.107 05:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur19:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English title is Fire Prowrestling not Fire Pro Wrestling 

message: King of Colosseum II is listed as part of the Fire Pro series, but from what I can tell, its only connection to the series is that they were produced by the same company and they're both wrestling games.  Should it really be listed here?  Come to think of it, a similar argument could be made against including HAL Wrestling. Jeff Silvers (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should King of Colosseum II be listed? 

message: Half the wikilinks are red, and the other 95% are pages that redirect to this page.  Are all the links necessary, or better yet, was it necessary to redirect the links to this article?  MDowdal (talk) 10:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a mess 

message: Individual articles used to exist for Fire Pro Wrestling Combination Tag, Fire Pro Wrestling 2nd Bout, Super Fire Pro Wrestling, Super Fire Pro Wrestling 3 Final Bout, Fire Pro Gaiden: Blazing Tornado, Fire Pro Wrestling: Iron Slam '96, Super Fire Pro Wrestling X Premium, Fire Pro Wrestling S: 6 Men Scramble, Fire Pro Wrestling (GBA), and Fire Pro Wrestling 2.  It appears that in December 2009, a user named Curtis23 took it upon himself to redirect all of these pages to Fire Pro Wrestling without any sort of formal discussion (at least not one that I could track down).  Since this would be a pretty wide-reaching series of reverts, I decided to bring a discussion here first (which is what should've been done in the first place).  Anybody object to reinstating some or all of the articles? Jeff Silvers (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the articles. They all vary in quality from stub class to barely middling, but such a mass redirect of articles required more broad consensus, which apparently was not achieved. And the self-redirects to this page were not fixed to boot. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual articles
Talk:Beres Hammond

message: Beres is one of Jamaica's most important singers, and should at least have a photo representing him. I have a few from a local concert, but not high enough quality to upload here. Are publicity shots from VP Records or Harmony House considered fair use? --Chimino (talk) 06:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlikely for a living person where a free image could be taken/found.--Michig (talk) 06:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, okay...I guess we'll have to wait for it then. --Chimino (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No free image? 
Talk:Port Chicago, California

message: Note that an anonymous, alleged resident claimed here on Wikipedia the following:
"Port Chicago was not bought by the U.S. Navy in the late 1990's as stated in the article, but in 1968.  I was a resident of the town for my entire life (17 years) at that time, and was there to protest and witness the distruction of the town."
10-13-05
I, too, lived many years in Port Chicago, and 1968 sounds correct as the date the town
was purchased by the Navy.  Many residents moved to local areas--Antioch, Pittsburg,
Concord, California.
There was (may still be) an annual reunion of former residents, held in the nearby
town of West Pittsburg.  I attended this reunion several times, before moving to
Colorado...
R.B. Jacobsen,
Fort Collins, Colorado  80524
*Comment left on article by 209.120.156.168
12-11-05
I lived for many years in the small town of Port Chicago,
California, and the correct year, if I recall correctly,
that the town was purchased by the government, was 1968,
and not the '1990s', as stated above.
This may be the user who left the earlier comment?  Vary 17:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I have edited the category to change it from "Ghost towns in California" to "Defunct towns in California."  Technically, a ghost town is an abandoned municipality with few to no residents and some remaining buildings.  As Port Chicago was completely razed, it does not qualify as a true ghost town.
It surprises me that so little of the history of the town of Port Chicago can be found on the web. The major focus is the explosion and mutiny that occurred at the Naval Weapon's Station. The civilian community with it's businesses, the Bay Point Elementary School, the development of Knox Park and those who lived there, the traditions and colorful members of the community as well as the fond memories of former inhabitants (which will soon be gone), will it all have a place, or just disappear like the town?
Former resident 1948 - 1958.        David A. Allen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olshouldadone (talk • contribs) 02:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently someone's changed it back, I'm reverting it to defunct towns. LonelyPker (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Category change

message: Bay Point (former settlement) was merged into Port Chicago:
 - OLEF641 (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Merge
Talk:Franklin Van Valkenburgh

message: Is the name "van Valkenburgh" or "Van Valkenburgh"?
http://history.navy.mil/danfs/v1/van_valkenburgh.htm consistently uses V, but http://history.navy.mil/danfs/a11/arizona-ii.htm uses both.
—wwoods 23:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: van or Van?

message: The name is Van Valkenburgh. You can take that on good faith since I am his great grandson.
That isn't necessarily that authoritative, surname spellings often change over generations, and it's even more likely that the mere case of a single letter can change easily. Thornfield Hall (talk) 08:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: van or Van?
Talk:World Sailing

message: I've started to add a bit to the article. All are welcome to join in, as I'm not really sure how much more to say. Maybe merge it with the IRYU article? - Dastal 23:02, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The indicated stubs could be better incubated within the main article. Haruth (talk) 09:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This page seems OK to me - it certainly does not require expansion.  I have improved the drafting in various places and clarified the history. Anthony Butler 09:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page OK

message: What about International Windsurfing Association - IWA and International Kiteboarding Association - IKA organized World Championships and World Cups? There is no mention of them in the article. Are those organizations not associated with World Sailing? Even if they are not there should be something to connect (http://internationalkiteboarding.org/the-sport/classes-and-equipment/types-of-kiteboarding) (http://www.internationalwindsurfing.com/windsurfing_competion_0002v01.htm) 213.149.61.214 (talk) 09:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither organisation has any status with World Sailing that I am aware of the only one that does which you haven't mentioned is the PWA. What both the IWA and IKA are the administration body for multiple World Sailing Class Association. I believe kiteboarding may be more complicated because of the PKRA and the agreement required to try and unify the sport but you would have to ask World Sailing about this there are some minutes somewhere. Yachty4000 (talk) 03:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Professional Windsurfer's Association (PWA) has joined the IWA as an Associate Member (http://www.sailing.org/news/20300.php#.XGsm9CrQjIU). Here (http://www.internationalwindsurfing.com/windsurfing_competion_0002v01.htm) is a diagram; see IWA <-> WS connection. It seems to me that there is more than playing the part of the administration body. WS took for itself only olympic kite and wind  classes. Other classes do not bother them.  213.149.61.151 (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  IWA and IKA 

message: Some info on Grades (listing them, grades of notable regattas like World and Continental Chs, Americas cup..., points correspondence to grade level) and how they apply to privately owned events like World Match Racing Tour. I know that regattas that were part of WMRT were also graded.
Also, how do privately owned competitions connect to World Sailing (grading and other staff)? 213.149.61.151 (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking of regattas 
Template talk:Biathlon flagrespip

message: This is an extension of Template:Biathlon flagresult (Talk/Usage); unlike that one, this template allows piped links ("flagrespip" = "flagresult, piped").
Parameters:
# The biathlete's full article name
# Variant of biathlete's name to display in results table/listing
# The biathlete's country
Example: 
Originator (to get the fame and the blame): --Wernher 23:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gretta Duisenberg

message: Is there a source for (later) antisemitic statements by Gretta Duisenberg? I have never heard these and they come from an anonymous user. Gidonb23:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It has nothing to do w/ her in her 'entirety'. Rather, it is a criticism of her politics from a Zionist perspective.
Zionists on Wiki always put in a section about someone's 'anti-Israel' stance. As if every human being must be divided up that way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.140.104.139 (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just read these article and I think you are right. This article is not written from a neutral point of view but from a zionist point of view. 
--Sgt.Friso (talk) 20:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article looks like another CAMERA/Zionist POV piece. 
Talk:Sotos syndrome

message: Some text in this article was originally taken from http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/sotos/sotos.htm (public domain) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouterstomp (talk • contribs) 23:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: I am working on finding citations for facts where indicated. I am also going to change the citation on the occurrence statistic from an Australian news article to a PMC, peer-reviewed source. LibrarianNicoleWiki (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  improving references/citations
Talk:Chinese race

message: Zhonghua Minzu is too PRC-centric a target for this IMO, most of the links to this refer to immigrants in the West who aren't Zhonghua-anything (I just changed the link that led me here to point to Chinese Canadian). I've changed this to redirect to Han Chinese, which I'll admit isn't a perfect choice due to minorities etc. but IMO it best fits what most English speakers would associate with "Chinese race" (see the redirect already in place at ethnic Chinese). DopefishJustin 23:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Serpent

message: This page has ballooned a bit like most DAB pages do over time.  I'm pruning it down in line with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):
*Removing redlinks for unlikely articles
*Removing all information not needed for disambiguation
*Un-linking all words that do not disambiguate Serpent
*Removing items that do not disambiguate Serpent
*Deleting the redirect from here to Talk:Serpent (symbolism).  Dab pages should have their own talk page.
If anyone disagrees with any of my edits, feel free to restore any item but please leave me a note here to let me know why. Cheers, ~ Veledan • Talk 20:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation & tidying 

message: I think that serpent should redirect to snake, with a "for other uses" bit at the top of that page; most of the pages linking here are expecting it to be a page about snakes. what y'all think? --User24 17:50, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disamb necessary?