Talk:Aljazeera.com

message: I can understand concerns about the article coming down too heavily on aljazeera.com, but it seems a little bit crazy not to even have a controversy section in the article. I'm interested in hearing some feedback, and I'll wait a couple days before making any changes. Pkmilitia 05:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Neutered

message: NPOV doesn't mean neutering the truth! It is objectively this "Pro-terrorist and Anti-Israel v. Pro-America/Israel" 
That's an empirical fact!
--24.97.224.6 16:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV, again 

message: I have completely rewritten this article keeping just a few sentences from the original. Please check and see if it's successfully NPOV. The Singing Badger 13:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it certainly isn't NPOV, but it is higher quality than the prior version. (Collounsbury 01:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I think that "aljazeera.com" fakes letters from readers. I can not prove this, since I can not prove whether a "Tim from Australia" or a "John from US" has written a letter condemning US or Israel, as always. However, the same means of expression, gramatic structure and style makes me think that these are usually the same persons and they are not from Western countries, nor Europe.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinso (talk • contribs) 
:Some of the letters may be faked but some are true. I tried and got my letter published. Not all letters are anti US or anti Israel. Some are in fact very anti Arab, not to say racist. It is a very strange and very manipulative site indeed. It seems to be set up to stir hatred among people. Bububu 17:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fraud with letters from readers 

message: You people critising alJazeera magazine are all Zionist. I know Al Jazeera Publishing and they are good people, but anti-Zionist. They are not anti-Jew and publish much materail from Jewish people. They hate the Al-Thani's of Qatar as they are corrupt. Al Jazeera Publishing is a Saudi owned organisation working closely with the Riyadh based Aljazeera Newspaper (a daily title).
The above comment was added by Harry Stanley.
--Well you don't know Al Jazeera Publishing well enough to know that it has nothing to do with Aljazeera magazine.  you also don't seem to have read the wikipedia article.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.133.179.226 (talk) 
:Oh really? Funny how they say they don't.
:Also, isn't it real funny how you seem to believe that it's somehow some sort of a plus to be Saudi owned (Saudi Arabia being one of the Middle Eastern countries with the worst human rights records. Oh, and hey! Pop quiz! How many of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi? Hmm?). You also seem to believe that it's a plus to hate Qatar. (One of the most progressive Middle Eastern countries, with a comparatively decent human rights record.) Well, thanks for sharing your insights with us. I can quite literally see where you're coming from. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.56.48.12 (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Stanley 

message: aljazeera.com now appears to be owned and operated by the tv station. just noticed it in the last few weeks. 207.216.253.134 (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  So it appears, it just links to the AJE frontpage. The article needs to be rewritten. 82.73.75.123 (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I confirm. It's been there for a while, it opens Al Jazeera English website. But I couldn't find any official statement about this change, wither Al Jazeera owns the domain name now or it is owned still by the magazine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.220.192.74 (talk) 16:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  change in ownership 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Aljazeera.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019013451/http://www.aljazeera.com/about.asp to http://www.aljazeera.com/about.asp
*Added archive https://archive.is/20140228223548/http://plus.aljazeera.com/ to http://plus.aljazeera.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Isreal has had to keep some control on the arabs since the 1967 war, so to be somewhat safe. Everytime the Arabs start another fight with the Jews, The jews tighten down the screws even more. What happened on October 7th, with an ambush, gang raping jewish women and cutting out their sexual organs. NICE. Now you die(Hamas) and keep military control on the arabs for years. Any build up of resistance, hammer them. You say the U.S should quit supplying Isreal with arms and such. Tells us maybe about how Iran should stop supplying arms to the underlings.Hamas,Hezbollah and the Houtie group. If Iran didn't supply and encourage the underlings to fight, maybe Oct 7th would have never happened. Write about that, or maybe you can't. So Iran stop supplying the underlings with arms and I agree U.S. stop supplying Israel. Bottom line your too biased and miss fair approach. 2604:3D08:1784:7F00:BC47:3557:ED16:E809 (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isreal- Palastine conflict: