lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shimon Peres

message: This page should be added to category : Israeli people of Belarusian-Jewish descent , because of the city he was born in FlamedIce (talk) 20:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Categories are based on what the place at birth, not what it became later. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 October 2021 

message: The info box states that Peres was affiliated with Kadima until 2016, yet Kadima was dissolved in 2015. The Hebrew Wikipedia has different years and affiliations that, generally, make more sense. Maybe replace our list? gidonb (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed this concern  SecretName101 (talk) 00:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kadima 

message: In the first sentence, please change
 was an Israeli politician who served as the ninth president of Israel from 2007 to 2014 and as the eighth prime minister of Israel from 1984 to 1986 and from 1995 to 1996.
to
 was an Israeli politician who served as the eighth prime minister of Israel from 1984 to 1986 and from 1995 to 1996 and as the ninth president of Israel from 2007 to 2014.
This puts the sentence in chronological order, and since the prime minister is far more important than the president, it puts the more significant office ahead of the less significant office. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 03:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: SWinxy (talk) 02:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 August 2022 

message: went unannounced to Moshe Dayan, the former minister of Ddfense   <---- TYPO should be defense Rafaj414 (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 October 2023 

message: mutiple = multiple 2603:8000:D300:3650:AD45:E6EE:7A8:8B7C (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 May 2024 

message: The word "interregnum" could possibly describe a politician out of office, but only in a joking tone. It isn't suitable in this sense for an encyclopedia article. TooManyFingers (talk) 02:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interregnum"
Talk:Tatenokai

message: Removed the thing about Morita being Mishima's lover.  Reason: a) I'd like to see a cite for this being true.  I'll agree to stipulate that Mishima had the hots for Morita, but I'm not sure Morita swung that way, or whether Mishima would have followed through on his feelings.  b) not sure this is relevant to a Tatenokai entry.  Seems more relevant to Mishima's personal entry. Nat Krause 07:53, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Enrique Amorim

message: for the monument to García Lorca and the house by Le Corbusier; didn't seem worth noting in the article itself. -- Jmabel 08:12, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Le Corbusier

message: Is this the same Enrique Amorim who is listed as writing the screenplays for Vacations in the Other World,  I Want to Die with You, Cita en la frontera, The Good Doctor, and Kilómetro 111? Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenwriter? 
Talk:Rugrats

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus that the 1991 series remains the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Unrelated, but you know you can just use "their" instead of "his/her" when you don't know someone's gender, btw. It's not ungrammatical at all; English has been using the singular 'they' since the 1300s in sentences like "Someone left their umbrella. I'll try to find them but I don't know where they went." Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 March 2024
Talk:Timeline of LGBT history

message: The Timeline of LGBT history attempts to be a global worldwide history, but gets more and more US centric as the years go on.
There is also a very extensive Timeline of LGBT history in the United Kingdom
The LGBT history page is much more global (and also ends up with a timeline approach)
There are 29 country specific timelines :Category:LGBT history by country 
And 26 country specific categories 
I propose that the Timeline of LGBT history and the subsequent century versions are rationalised
Pjthompso (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationalise Timeline of LGBT history 

message: What does this bullet have to do with LGBT history? Greyspeir (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Era - 1st Millenium - 1st Century - 37-41 AD
Talk:Pangu

message: Are those numbers meant to be years in the Original source documents section? If should +0220 AD +0265 AD be read as the span of years 220-265? --Dschwen 22:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dschwen, Yes, they were; I copied them from material I wrote and formatted earlier before being familiar with the Wiki Manual of Style. This should be resolved now. I am still learning; let me know of any other mistakes. My apologies if that was confusing. mamgeorge 17:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years? 

message: According to the article of the french wikipedia and another book i've read "Mankind was made from the parasites on Pangu's body"...
Can anyone help?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.61.140 (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Parasites

message: As I see it, the section in which this appears is supposed to be mainly based on Xu Zheng's account:
身之諸蟲。因風所感。化為黎甿。 This (黎甿)is universally understood as "they became the common people". Not animals.
Furthermore, the section goes on to the myth of creation by Nüwa, which (a) is not in Xu Zheng (I think) (b) is not relevant to the topic. If some source *does* link the story of Pangu and Nüwa, please reference it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.214.21.64 (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: the fleas on his fur became animals

message: If you look at the page views over the past 30 days, this article has been viewed 5000 times, Pangu Team about half that, at around 2500 views.  But Pangu (disambiguation) only has some odd ~100 views and all of the other articles have around that much.  Clearly there are a good number of readers who are very much looking for information on the iOS jailbreak tool when they type in "Pangu" and I think a specific mention should be made for it. Comments? hbdragon88 (talk) 08:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My preference is to have the hatnote as clean as possible, but I'm okay with re-adding Pangu Team to the hatnote if it's so popular. -Zanhe (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote 

message: The times in the following sentence do not seem to make sense:
"The first writer to record the myth of Pangu was Xu Zheng during the Three Kingdoms period. Recently his name was found in a tomb dated 194 AD."
Can this be clarified? --BLebow4500 (talk) 04:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Kingdoms period = 194? 

message: Pangu reminds me of Ymir Nyarlat 1920 (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Ymir
Talk:February 28

message: 1909 Sir Stephen Spender, British poet, critic, editor and translator; Poet Laureate. His early poetry – like that of WH Auden, Cecil Day Lewis, and Louis MacNeice, with whom he became associated at Oxford – was inspired by social protest.
:It is ok to add things to the articles you know.  See the welcome message on the Main Page that links to how to edit pages. -- Graham  :) 13:17, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spender 

message: What about the 1997 bank robbery shootout in Hollywood, California?
i really don't know anything about this particular robbery,but i would to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.66.20 (talk) 07:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shootout 

message: The page currently states that the 28th Feb is "the 59th day of the year (60th in leap years)".
Is it not the 59th day in every year regardless of if it's a leap year as the extra day falls after this one?
Please change if you agree with me. Pma04ajl (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's generated from a template.  It's supposed to be generated from a template.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Fixed .  Thanks. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  60th day of a leap year? 

message: 1710 – In the Battle of Helsingborg, 14,000 Danish invaders under Jørgen Rantzau are decisively defeated by an equally sized Swedish force under Magnus Stenbock. This is the last time Swedish and Danish troops meet on Swedish soil.
Should this not read 'meet in battle'? I guess the two armies have met many times since. Shipsview (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715) and  Great Northern War should be of help. Ken Tholke (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of 'meet'

message: The entry "1885 – The American Telephone and Telegraph Company is incorporated in New York as the subsidiary of American Bell Telephone. (American Bell would later merge with its subsidiary.)" is listed on this page (February 28).
When clicking on American Telephone and Telegraph Company, the resulting page shows a founding date of March 3, 1885.
There are no references that can easily be found on either page to clarify the correct date, but obviously one is wrong.
Perhaps someone with more research skills can ascertain the correct date.
It should also be noted that there is a very similar entry on the page for March_3.
--MyRandomUserName (talk) 18:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible misplaced entry AT&T's incorporation. 

message: Is Rare Disease Day appropriate for holidays and observances?  Is it rather an awareness day, which should not go here? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  rare disease day 

message: How is his birthday not on here? 2603:9000:F602:633F:D834:3562:DCB0:4FB9 (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. Why don't you add it? Kiwipete (talk) 07:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario Andretti
Talk:List of Japanese people

message: Sigh.  This page needs INCREDIBLE update :(
Revth 14:11, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: What is the justification for using the Japanese name order for modern people on this page? The Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles) says to use the usual name order. For example, Toshiro Mifune, rather than Mifune Toshirō. I noticed User:AutumnSnow changed the list of actors into Japanese order, can someone justify doing that please? I did do a revert on the page but I have undone it again, since I would rather not take that kind of drastic action. Perhaps there is a reason for this name ordering. Comments? --DannyWilde 08:23, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment makes sense. And I notice that in almost 6 years no one has argued against these points. Nonetheless, the page is a confused mix of name orders. And, the instructions to use Japanese name order remain at the top of the page. That (to me) is not helpful. I came to the page and thought to contribute several names. The people I added were already in Wikipedia, so I just linked to their pages. Those pages used western name order. I hope it doesn't rub anyone the wrong way, but I'm going to delete the note about using Japanese name order. It's misinformation, as far as I can see.  — Comment added by Lupa avens (talk • contribs) 00:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name order

message: Removed Akebono from the list (Sumo) because errr.... he isn't Japanese.  He's from Hawaii.  
Saiing 13:30, 7 March 2006 (JST)
:errr... he became a Japanese citizen in 1996. Check wikipedia. So please put it back where it was.122.27.250.213 (talk) 03:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akebono 

message: Why no section on famous Japanese criminals? I will start compiling one shorly for introduction to the main page. If you have any comments or suggestions for inclusion please let me know. 122.27.250.213 (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime 

message: How come there are no Japanese animators?--Yacatisma (talk) 23:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Animators
Talk:OLED

message: The article suggest that OLED is fundamentally different from inorganic LED. Seems to me not so fundamental. Both are based on radiative recombination of electron-hole pairs.  LEDs using GaP, and other indirect gap materials, also use exciton recombination. Two layer materials can be described as pn junctions. In addition, non-radiative recombination due to defects is the usual cause for reduced emission with age. Gah4 (talk) 20:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  fundamental 

message: After searching around for a bit the J Kido, M Kimura and K Nagai white light emitting organic electroluminescent device seems to have way less citations than what I expected, is it because the invention is kinda obvious or what?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirad1000 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  White OLED 

message: :OLED is fundamentally different from LED which is based on a p-n diode structure. In LEDs doping is used to create p- and n- regions by changing the conductivity of the host semiconductor. OLEDs do not employ a p-n structure.  Doping of OLEDs is used to increase radiative efficiency by direct modification of the quantum-mechanical optical recombination rate.  Doping is additionally used to determine the wavelength of photon emission.
 
This section seems to contradict the rest of the intro, where OLED is described as a type LED technology (as it is in the article's infobox). The link simply points to the LED article. I'm not an expert at all on this topic, but perhaps it's meant to mean that OLED displays are "fundamentally different" from "LED" in the sense meant at LED display? Or, alternatively, perhaps it means that LEDs as found in OLEDs are different from conventional/regular LEDs as used in lighting (if that's a meaningful distinction to make here; again, I'm no expert). In any case, at present, the article starts by saying that an OLED is a type of LED (“An organic light-emitting diode (OLED or organic LED), also known as organic electroluminescent (organic EL) diode, is a light-emitting diode (LED) in which[...]”), and then proceeds to say that OLED is fundamentally different from LED. Both cannot be true; I think this could do with some re-wording/clarification. Perhaps I'm missing/misunderstanding something and there is no contradiction, but if that's the case then I believe the wording should be updated so that the more specific meaning (whatever it be) is more readily apparent. --Tomatoswoop (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Section in intro, perhaps could do with slight rewording for clarification? 

message: There's no mention of banding at low brightness values. I don't have any reliable source, for now 66.98.85.105 (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banding
Talk:Edvard Kardelj

message: The poorly documented insinuations about Kardelj advocating the hiring of convicts into the Yugoslav military intelligence service surprise me somewhat, as does the story of Arkan being Kardelj's protége. Did somebody perhaps confuse Edvard Kardelj with Stane Dolanc? --Peterlin 15:57, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The insinuation about Kardelj is non-documented and as far as I am concerned NPOV. --Besednjak 22:01, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: In the article, it says  "was mourned by some of the media to an extent comparable to the orchestrated mourning that followed the death of Tito one year later." which is ridiculously biased and POV, both to Kardelj and Tito Hauser 12:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Neutrality of article about Edvard Kardelj is disputable. If necessary, will come citations too. --Stebunik (talk) 00:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think so, please go ahead improving it. Please, explain why you dispute the article's neutrality, in order to have a fruitful discussion. Viator slovenicus (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Please, let you see article of Edvard Kardelj, Slovenian Wikipedia. I can not enough English to translate it. Its translation could be enough for neutrality. --Stebunik (talk) 10:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm going to pull down what seems to be a stale NEUTRALITY flag. I don't see any glaring issues with the piece, other than it needs to be expanded and sourced out better. Carrite (talk) 02:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality of this article is disputable

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Robin (character)

message: I propose merging the list Robin in other media into the main article Robin as a new section. With some minor adjustments, the content can be seamlessly integrated into the main article. This merge will enhance the context of Robin's character and should not present any issues regarding article size or undue weight. Lililolol (talk) 20:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Japanese language and computers

message: I'd like to see a section on the history of Japanese computing. I've seen a (copyrighted, sadly) photo of an early kanji-capable keyboard, which had to be used with a stylus because there were so many keys. This article may be helpful. — Gwalla | Talk 20:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and Development 

message: The link to FEP goes to an internal wikipedia disambiguation page, and the meanings listed for that doesn't include one that matches what FEP should mean.
Should the reference to that page be removed?
:In this context, I guess FEP should have to mean front end processor. In 1980s Japan, typical early-time Japanese input methods were a kind of front end processors (FEP), so they were called Japanese language FEP (or simply FEP). --Rija 17:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FEP 

message: The following line can be found in this revision of this article (latest revision as of writing, link provided for reference):There has been resistance against Unicode in Japan since it is said to be an American invention not Japanese.
Are there any reliable sources to support such an argument? And even if there were reliable sources, is such an argument even necessary in this article? Coming from a Japanese family living in the US, I can see both sides of the issue and I feel such a statement detracts from the educational and, most importantly, neutral nature of an encyclopedia. King Arthur6687 (talk) 23:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Oda Mari (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsuitable Bias? 

message: Unicode has left to right and right-to-left control characters. I'm pretty sure it does not yet offer a top-bottom control character, but maybe some coverage on this would be useful for completeness. -- I have browsed 5 pages so far on wikipedia searching for coverage on the topic, and none of them have been sufficient, which to me shows that at least somewhere there should be a more complete coverage of the topic. --— robbiemuffin page talk 12:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction of text 

message: This is true if writing in modern English for native English readers.
As soon as you add the need for IPA equivalent phonetics, is 256 still sufficient ?
The assertion seems to trade on an ambiguity - on the printed page of a typical published novel which itself contains no mathematics, no foreign names ...which is NOT the case of internet documents.
G. Robert Shiplett 10:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  in order to write English 

message: Taught Saadinasab (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  teaching
Talk:Box-counting dimension

message: Box-counting dimension is not identical with Hausdorff dimension; this redirect is inappropriate, therefore.Charles Matthews 18:01, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, however, identical with Minkowski-Bouligand dimension, which also goes under a variety of other names... we should probably merge these two articles now. Terry 18:09, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do it, I hope I might have time the weekend. Gadykozma 18:53, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a crack at it already... but it might still be worth someone else looking over it and making sure it is OK. Terry 03:12, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Very nice job. Thanks. Gadykozma 00:55, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:X-COM: Genesis

message: This section was written in a highly unencyclopaedic form, reading more like a piece of fiction or a opinion piece from a tabloid newspaper. If someone could rewrite the section that is commented out from the article, that would be great. 220.238.67.41 (talk) 02:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Section had about a dozen facts in it.  Cut out the prose.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.94.243 (talk) 02:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Axe
Talk:Joshua Waitzkin

message: Hi, I reference the quoted passage which ends with— </br>
"It was something that I loved so deeply that when I started to become alienated from it, I couldn't do it in an immature way".
To me this doesn't make sense. It seems to say the opposite of what happened in the way he left chess. Is it meant to be "I couldn't do it in a mature way" ? 
Given that it implies an abrupt finality (i.e. immature) leaving, is the quote correct? Manytexts (talk) 11:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct quotation? 
Talk:Blood curse

message: :, which is a different anti-Semitic belief
Snipped text implied that calling Jews responsible for the death of Jesus, is anti-Semitic. This might be a widely held view, but it's not a "fact". Can someone cite an authority, like A. Foxman? Should be easy to source this one... --Uncle Ed 20:47, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-semitic

message: I'm not sure this actually counts as a relevant example, but I noticed that a similar blood curse existed in the case of abortionists and abortions.  ADM (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a completely different issue. History2007 (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Abortion and the blood curse

message: -surely a far more familiar name? Johnbod (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Pilate washing his hands is the verse before this. The Blood curse term is used for this verse, not the prior, per the first ref in the article. History2007 (talk) 19:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name to [[Pilate washes his hands]] 

message: It was the cry of the people among the Jews who were for Jesus Denzil john (talk) 03:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His blood be upon us