Talk:Bleach (manga)/Archive 5

message: Despite the long-standing consensus against it, a user just created the article List of Bleach story arcs to hold Bleach plot summary. I have nominated it for deletion. Please express your opinions there. --tjstrf talk  08:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just one comment: while I previously thought that the arc titles were unable to be attributed, they are used on the DVDs (at least in Japan), and therefore do have some basis in fact. Dekimasuよ! 02:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oy. Thanx for letting me know about this one. I also don't see much of a point to give a detailed summary of a pretty straight forward anime like this. Though there are a few that leave me going "WTF just happend?", bleach isn't one of them. -Malevious  Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 03:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD on [[List of Bleach story arcs]]

message: Hey all, I was wondering where that should be put, the media article, or the main article? Just H 23:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bleach media and materials –Gunslinger47 00:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info on Title Songs

message: Why is every practically every single mention of shinigami on the page in italics when every single other page doesn't follow this standard? Sephiroth BCR 03:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Talk:Bleach (manga)#Italics above, as well as a few notes on the talk page above that. Since that time I did ask for clarification at WP:MOS-JP as well, and it appears that the wording that will enter the Japanese MOS is that we should follow the main manual of style, which mandates italics. If there are any cases on the page now of "shinigami" (without italics), please let me know. Dekimasuよ! 03:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem if that's the accepted policy. I'm merely pointing to basically every other mention of shinigami in character articles, conceptual articles (zanpakutō, kidō, etc.), and other Bleach articles that does not use shinigami in italics. The consistency simply seems odd. Sephiroth BCR 06:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably because I'm the person who was strongly in favor of putting the italics in place here, and I only regularly edit three or four other Bleach-related articles. I believe they should be italicized in those articles too, as should zanpakutō and kidō. Dekimasuよ! 06:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it visually disruptive to the extreme. But then, I also put commas outside of quotation marks, so whatever. --tjstrf talk  06:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shinigami

message: I don't know how I found it, but I happened to stumble across List of Bleach cast members. I didn't even know that it existed until just five minutes ago. Am I the only one who thinks the list is pointless and should be redirected or deleted? Should we work to improve it instead of redirecting/deleting it? // DecaimientoPoético 17:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know its purpose, but it was created by the CanisRufus bot.  Presumably there was a purpose.  You might want to ask the bot's designer. –Gunslinger47 18:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That CanisRufus bot has been taking away categories like "Bleach Cast Members", "Fullmetal Alchemist Cast Members", "Naruto Cast Members" and so on from all the voice actors/seiyuu that I watch. I really would like to know why he feels the need to remove those categories just to make a page which is totally unneeded.  We already state on the character articles who does the voices, so it's just another redundant page.  Jezebel Parks 20:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, about that. There was a mass CfD a while back that decided against having any more voice actors by series categories since they were cluttering the pages of the voice actors. I probably should've mentioned this earlier since I knew, but I spaced it out. As for the list, I'll redirect it to the main media and materials page. --tjstrf talk  21:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinions please

message: I beleive that there should be an article in the Zanpakutō about the release stages (i dont mean about what there like but a list of characters that know HOW to do them and a list ((or redirect)) about what there like. I dont think I am the only one who would aprove of this. (if there is one already can someone give me a redirect >.> ) so if anyone else thinks this would be a good idea can you add to this!! Dark reaper6789 20:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Zanpakutō does that. If it doesn't then I'm not sure what you asking. Gdo01 20:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The Zanpakutō article already has that under "Zanpakutō by character". It's as simple as doing Ctrl + F and looking for "Initial release" and "Final release". ~SnapperTo 21:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release

message: Since we italicize shinigami, kidō, etc., should zanpakutō be italicized as well? It's a Japanese term, and most Japanese terms are usually in italics. Sorry to ask such a stupid question, it's just that I saw instances where it was italicized and others where it wasn't while looking through the Bleach articles. // DecaimientoPoético 01:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should. It's no different from shinigami or kido. Sephiroth BCR 01:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I guess I'll start italicizing then. I might as well, with all this free time. // DecaimientoPoético 01:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zanpakutō - should it be italicized?

message: To the moderator, can you please update the dubbers in the character list. I know a few dubbers in the Philippines that dubs 5 of the main characters. Can you please update?
Ichigo - Marky Cielo,
Rukiya - Yasmien Kurdi,
Inoue - Nicole Anderson,
Chad - Dion Ignacio,
Uryu - Rainier Castillo.,
Tnx.
PS: the sentence pertaining to the showing of bleach in the philippines, is out-of-date. please change the tense of the sentence, tnx. I keep changing it but it comes back to where it was. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ja 1207 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We aren't going to list every voice actor each character has. The "anime voices" template is for Japanese and English voice actors only, so those are the voice actors we're going to have on the pages. // DecaimientoPoético 23:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Filipino dubbers

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
3b. Is this article about the franchise in general or is it about the manga specifically. If it is about the manga (which I am going to assume as per the article title) then major work is needed to focus the article. For example, the Bount section should be removed entirely. If it is about bleach in general it provides a good overview of the series, and deserves the GA status with just a little work. More citation is needed when sales statistic are used. Still well referenced in most places however so I did not fail it on that mark. Chad's arm needs citation also, I don't believe that it is metal. 
: I am putting the review on hold. Let me know where this article is focused and I can re-review it using the appropriate criterion.
Cronholm144 20:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am guessing that it was a reference to the "36 million" figure in the article summary. The citation for it is in the media section. Dekimasuよ! 05:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As relates to that, the new source for the 39 million figure appears to refer back to the source we were already using (the 2ch Jump log) as justification for that number, and the 2ch Jump log still lists the figure as 36 million. I am not sure we can consider the new source reliable, and it is certainly one step further removed from the actual sales data. I'd like to change the source and figure back, unless there are objections here. Dekimasuよ! 06:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to withdraw my objection. The 2ch Jump log is still showing a figure of 36 million, but that was last updated at the end of February, and since then it has extra data on volumes 26 and 27. It's clear that the new article synthesizes that information instead of just citing it outright, but since we're not the ones doing the synthesizing, I suppose that's okay. If the Jump log updates to a new number, I'll change the citation back, but if not, I'll leave it alone, and the current cite is in English, which is a plus. Dekimasuよ! 02:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA-Pass

message: I have just noticed this thing and it's IMO a very good addition to this talk page. However, there are two problems:
#We refer to "artificial souls" rather than "modified souls" in order to incorporate all manufactured souls. - I can't remember when we agreed on this, and the sentence doesn't really make sense. We actually do refer to modsouls as modified souls, and gigai as gigai. What does this sentence talk about?
#It was actually agreed that the citation format for individual chapter/page cases should stay simple, without volume ISBNs and such because not all chapters are in volumes, it's a bloody mess, and other reasons. This should be changed accordingly.
Hope these issues are resolved ASAP.
-- Ynhockey (Talk) 21:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like #1 might be refering to the Character type section, where modsouls are under the artifical soul sub-header. –Gunslinger47 23:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think that was just for the purposes of this page, and came about as a result of Talk:Bleach (manga)/Archive 4#Modified souls. Perhaps. As for Ynhockey's second question, I think we need a full citation format (either citing the volumes or the relevant magazine issues until the volumes come out). It's possible to fix all of the citations on this page based on the individual volumes. That's something I've been intending to do but haven't gotten around to yet. Tjstrf had also suggested linking to the relevant part of the Bleach media and materials page as a way of getting around mentioning the ISBN numbers, I believe. Dekimasuよ! 02:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Linking to the Bleach media and materials page is a very good idea. ISBN numbers for every in-line citation we use would create a barely understandable mess. It's true that Wikipedia has certain policies, but we also need not forget that for the Bleach articles the audience is somewhat different, and a special adaptation is needed. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 04:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (I actually meant List of Bleach chapters. But I agree. Dekimasuよ! 05:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of archived standardization topics 

message: The description starts with "The primary protagonist of Bleach, orange-haired high school freshman Ichigo Kurosaki is forced to become a substitute shinigami after unwittingly absorbing all of Rukia's powers." I want to know where this idea of 'orange-haired' came from. If that is orange, then what does yellow/blonde look like? Isn't it arguable that the title of the show is a result of his bleach-blonde hair? Just curious. I'm not trying to argue that that's the cause for the title; I'm just saying I feel this should be changed to blonde or yellow-haired because I don't see a hint of orange in there. -- Whoa2000 14:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The show would not seem to hold the same opinion, lest we ignore the numerous references to orange hair ("carrot-top", to name just one). Besides, it looks pretty orange to me. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty certain that it's supposed to specifically be strawberry blonde.  This is a reference to both his name (ichigo Wiktionary:苺) and to the title (Bleach).  Strawberry blonde is the color black hair takes when bleached by peroxide. –Gunslinger47 07:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes a lot of sense. Should the article be changed to that then? (Including the link to that article?) ((Also, sorry I forgot to sign my name before.)) -- Whoa2000 14:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

text:  I thought that his hair is supposed to be naturally orange. As in not bleached by anything. And the manga also specifically states "orange" regarding his hair color (when giving out basic stats in the first chapter). Eellee 21:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is naturally orange, but that doesn't stop the name being a reference to the normal method one would need to use to get hair that colour. --tjstrf talk 21:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People gave Ichigo a hard time growing up because they thought he bleached his hair. –Gunslinger47 21:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone seems to keep missing the fact that we have no clue why the show is called Bleach, a reference to the hair may be a coincidence for all we know. Until we know why, the "bleached hair" argument doesn't work. --Malevious  Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We do indeed have a clue, namely Ichigo's hair. We just don't have confirmation. So it's nothing we can put into the article, but if we're getting questioned about the name constantly on the talk page then there's nothing wrong with giving the reasonable guesses that have developed. --tjstrf talk 21:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering questions on the title yes, but using the hair-title reference for info in the article is different. We can't change the info on Ichigo's hair color to blonde because people reference the bleach title. Although I believe it is supposed to be strawberry blonde as his nickname is strawberry. But I believe in the first chapter or so of the manga it called it orange. Unless either the anime, manga or Kubo tell us the color it's supposed to be I think he should change it to something neutral (light colored or something similar). Yea, I'm starting to confuse myself here so ima shut up now. --Malevious  Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, well I wasn't suggesting we do that. Agreed. --tjstrf talk 21:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: If that's the page I'm thinking of, Ichigo's hair is officially given as "orande". --tjstrf talk 21:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ichigo's Description

message: Since I know not everyone watches the taskforce talk page, I'm crossposting here.
Basically, the guideline on spoiler warnings, WP:SW, has been rejected. The spoiler warning templates still exist, but their usage is currently determined solely by user discretion. I would like to collect opinions on what qualifies as a spoiler in Bleach-related articles, so that we can hopefully weather this policy flux without any editing disputes.
Please discuss at WT:BLEACH#Spoiler warnings: to use or not use?. --tjstrf talk  21:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might also want to note Talk:Bleach (manga)/Archive 4#Defining a Spoiler. Dekimasuよ! 00:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thank you, I remember that one. However, it was last year, and things have changed a bit since then. --tjstrf talk 00:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think most of it still applies. Some of it hasn't been aired in the anime until quite recently. And since most of it hasn't been aired in English yet, I think it should still remain in spoilers for those fans who come here only following the show in English. --Malevious  Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler warnings: to use or not use?

message: IT'S OVER FIVE THOUSAND!!!
Sorry, just had to say that. :) --tjstrf talk 06:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lol. Remind us when IT'S OVAR NINE THOUSAND!!! Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 5,000 is the limit for a single page view, so you can check for 5k, 10k, 15k, etc. but anything in between is hard to pin down. Hopefully we'll be a featured article by the time our revision count matches Ichigo's power level though. --tjstrf talk 06:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision count

message: This article has come a long way, so good job to all involved. There is a small contraction, one part of the article says "Ichigo unintentionally absorbs almost all of Rukia's powers" and then later it says "after unwittingly absorbing all of Rukia's powers". There are sentences that need slight rewording like "conflicting loyalties between his job and Rukia, with whom he grew up" could maybe be "Rukia, with whom he was childhood friends with" just to sound more formal? What do others think about these two points? --Squilibob 13:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentences 

message: Apparently, there's been some small edit warring on Chad's English voice actor. I was thinking, can't we just leave his japanese seiyū there, without his english voice actor? I'll (and everyone else) be satisified when it's been confirmed and properly cited that Jamieson Price is the real voice actor. I haven't found it on any website yet. Peace, The Hippietalk 22:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chad's voice 

message: Please put the first 5 main cast in Bleach are GMA Network Kapuso Cast. 
The rest are Alta Productions Voice Actors/Actress. 
GMA Artist:
* Marky Cielo as Kurosaki Ichigo
* Yasmien Kurdi as Rukia Kuchiki
* Rainier Castillo as Uryuu Ishida
* Nicole Anderson as Inoue Orihime
* Dion Ignacio as Sado Yasutora
Alta Productions Voice Actors/Actress:
The Kurosaki Family:
* Isshin Kurosaki (Roger Aquino)
* Masaki Kurosaki (Jing M. Lanzona)
* Karin Kurosaki (Mary Joy Adorable)
Who also voice in anime series ofHenry01 20:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry to tell you, but you just wasted your time. We are only listing the Japanese and English voice actors (don't ask me why, 'cause I don't know). // DecaimientoPoético 20:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm assuming it's because this is the English wiki so we list English and we list Japanese because it's the original. --Malevious  Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that this is the case. The really important listings we need are only the English VAs and the Japanese seiyus. Any other voice actors arent notable enough for inclusion. This info might be helpful on the Tagalog Wikipedia version of this page... --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 22:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bleach Tagalog Cast

message: User:Malevious is tagging Bleach images for lacking fair-use, but at least one uploader is not going to notice in time.  Those looking for something to do might want to scan through :Category:Bleach images looking for images he tagged. –Gunslinger47 02:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added fair use rationale to quite a few images, although I think that to be on the safe side, we need to reduce the resolution of those images not significantly cropped. For example, 480x360 is a decent size which clearly displays the subject. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 02:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked about it earlier on WP:NONFREE's talk page.  288p was the highest resolution that no one complained about.  That's 384x288 for regular 4:3 images and 512x288 for 16:9. –Gunslinger47 02:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images on their way to deletion 

message: I don't actually know how, but if we could do some formatting so that there wasn't that big white space at the beginning of the Introduction section, it would look much nicer. I tried a few things, but the only thing that seems to work is moving the picture out of alignment. EDIT: I left-oriented the picture, and made the section a touch longer so that it would fit better. Midaki 05:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see the white space before. At what resolution are you viewing the page? Dekimasuよ! 01:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1680x1050, widescreen. Gigantor. I suppose that is why. Midaki 07:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: I just have one question it's about there names, Ichigo's name is written out as Ichigo Kurosaki there for putting his name before his family's, but then why is Matsumoto's and Hitsugaya's family name put before there own, they are the only two who have there family name written before there's, in a Janpanese format. And in episode 131-132 I notice that they start introducing them selfes as "Matsumoto Rangiku" and "Hitusgaya Toshiro". When they used to reverse there names putting Rangiku before Matsumoto and Toshiro before Hitsugaya?Ultimaterasengan 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, Toshiro and Rangiku are the respective first names of the 10th Division Captain and Lieutenant. And we use western name order for all of the characters on this Wikipedia because this is the English Wikipedia and the Viz dub of the show also uses those naming conventions. Also, the anime, because it is orignally in Japanese, uses Japanese naming conventions, putting the family name in front of the given name. --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 14:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Why do some of my friends call me "Jezzy" or "Parks" instead of Jezebel?  People have different ways of referring to others.  Women in the work place are usually referred to by their surnames by their superiors.  How does this help the article?  This isn't a place to ask these types of questions randomly. This isn't a fan forum.  Jezebel Parks 16:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversed names? 

message: Hello wikipedian and editers,
I went to the episode guide it said episode 138 "Second move of Hueco Mundo! Hitsugaya vs Yammy" and episode 139 "Ichigo vs Grimmjow, 11 second battle!" is really the real manga where we left off after ichigo recover his hollow power after his training with the vizard.   Rickengothic 2:25, August 12 2007 (UTC)
:Yea we know. I'm so happy!Finally...--Hanaichi 07:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filler end August 22? 

message: I remember checking to see if that should be linked before, but failing to find the correct article. It appears AnimeCentral is a valid link, but Anime Central refers to something else entirely. It seems to me there's a need for a dab. Dekimasuよ! 13:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the revert of my revert 

message: How does VIZ romanize Yoruichi's name in the manga and anime? WhisperToMe 05:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure there's no apostrophes, if that's the question. Dekimasuよ! 07:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoruichi Shihouin's romanization 

message: Shouldn't it also be under comedy as well? -Cicaneo
:We've already had this discussion.  It isn't a comedy because a comedy anime refers to a show that concentrates solely on funny things, such as Excel Saga and possibly Azumanga Daioh.  Bleach is action/fighting, over all, Shonen.  It doesn't focus on humor enough to make it a comedy. Jezebel Parks 07:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: While most agreed that some articles would need to be merged (like Chōjirō Sasakibe), the merging is getting out of hand. TTN now merged Izuru Kira, an important character with numerous appearances, who even takes part in the Bount filler arc, into List of Bleach shinigami. What's more, a consensus was never reached at the discussion on what exactly to merge, and the only revised proposals were made by User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares, who isn't even active on Bleach-related pages. This problem needs to be fixed ASAP and the mass-merging has to be stopped until a concensus is reached on each and every character.
The above comment will appear on Talk:Bleach (manga) and Talk:List of Bleach characters. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 09:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone now merged Yamamoto, Unohana and Komamura. He's just deleting articles, that's undercover vandalism. Someone stop him please 82.52.33.49 20:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion and merger of articles 

message: Well, the full scans are now out on the internet (Download thread at BleachExile), and while much of them are trivial facts, there are still some worth mentioning materials in there (such as the complete info on the Insignias, as well as battle data for each captains).  Also, this book should be included under the list of medias on the media page (though I'm not sure if this should belong to the Manga section or the databooks section).  Anyway, have fun with it!  I'm too busy to help maintaining/adding materials in the articles lately. --Finestela 15:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bleach Official Bootleg: Colorful Bleach + 

message: The image :Image:Bleach cosplay.jpg has been removed twice. I do wonder why, given arguments are:
* this is an English wikipedia, which I don't believe includes Brazil
* no pictures of cosplayers
* Poor quality picture that adds nothing to the article
In responce I will say:
* English Wikipedia is an international project and argument that photos from non-English parts of the world only shows lack of understanding of this project
* I am not familiar with any policy or guideline that would discourage use of cosplayer's photos
* the picture has good resolutions and focus - hardly "poor quality" - and adds quite a few things to the article (images of characters not on screenshots, proof of reception worldwide reception)
The article is also image-light, and last but not least - this is the only free licence image on this page. Our policies for fair use images are getting stricter by day, and anybody familiar with pains of FA-quality anime articles which do indeed feature ONLY cosplay images on main page (as they are the only free images available) should know that cosplay is quite acceptable and helpful in illustrating the subject(s) in question.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While personally I'm not against the usage of such photos, unless the article directly talks about the cosplay aspect of the work (in this case, Bleach), I don't see it should be used in this particular case. It's like the usage of doujin/fan-drawn images.  Unless you're dealing with the doujin popularity or such, you should refrain from using such images. --Finestela 17:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone on WP:ANIME basically said not to use them for different reasons. (Feel free to join in on the discussion over there if you haven't already) --Malevious  Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Even if it were agreed upon to use cosplay pictures in the article, there are plenty of American and Japanese cosplay pictures to choose from.  I don't see why we would use a picture of Brazilian cosplayers when this article doesn't focus of the Brazilian/Portuguese version of the show.  And they're right, it adds nothing to the article.  Jezebel Parks 20:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: why american? 217.43.27.170 21:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre opposition to cosplay image(s) 

message: As apparently no one has seen this yet, List of Bleach Soul Society: The Sneak Entry arc episodes has been nominated for FL status here. Please express your comments and any possible improvements, and note that there is one day until the nomination closes. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FLC