Talk:Kemetic Orthodoxy

message: Hello everyone, I and a few others are working on a complete re-write of this page to include the following section:  Legal description, The House of Netjer, Membership, Beliefs, Kemetic Orthodoxy and other religions, History, and Criticism.  This re-write will also increase the number of links and references.  If anyone wishes to help with this, or to make sure that certain statements are made, let me know.  IanCheesman (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, would love to give a hand Downix (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For attributional posterity, this rewrite was accomplished at . — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete rewrite

message: Well, here it is folks, hope it is better than it was.  Obviously, anyone who wishes to help make it even better, your help is more than welcome. IanCheesman (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: new version

message: With the content changed to African Traditional, I have removed the categories and all other major links to dealing with Neopagan religion, including the ratings info (both here and on the Neopagan assessment page).  Unfortunately there is no African Traditional group similar to the Neopagan assessment group, so we will be limited to the assesments from the Egypt and Religion groups (neither of whom have looked at this page yet).  IanCheesman (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neopagan vs. African Traditional

message: We have received our first review.  Take a look and lets see what can be done. - IanCheesman (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First review

message: In light of the fact that it's not possible to prevent an article from being sold wholesale, the article is being tuned up as we speak.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigmaticmagpie (talk • contribs) 23:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon.com Publication 

message: I've added some additional tags to the article. All of which are relevant and accurate, to my eyes. A majority of the contributions to the article have been added by proponents and practitioners of Kemetic Orthodoxy. Which is fine, but it's unfortunately resulted in an article that in unbalanced, intricate, overly promotional, and heavily reliant on primary sources. I'm not sure who's watching this page, but I'd love to have some collaboration on doing an extensive rewrite of this article. It is a notable subject, but the article as it is hardly conforms to Wikipedia policy. Anyone game? Quinto Simmaco (talk) 09:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: we could also ask the AE wikiproject and FTN. Doug Weller talk 21:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :KO temporary. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#KO temporary until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Ibadibam (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "KO temporary" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User:Enigmaticmagpie/Sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 23:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft