lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nissan Pao

message: Nissan Pao editing help
ja,
日産・パオに関する原文は、私のブログ記事からの提供です。
なお、原文は日本語である為、必要ならば、加筆依頼と修正編集を希望します。
GFDLによる使用許可は出していますので参照URLをご覧下さい。
・日産パオの記事に対する開示規約。
Wikipedia　GFDL　OK
条件1、公的機関投稿条件。
　「GFDLによる使用」のみ容認。
条件2、(イ)原作本人のみ原文使用、投稿可。
条件2、(ロ)該当事項に必要なる
　　　　　追記、加筆に至っては奨励容認。
　又は同原作本人容認の元による転載可。
条件3、利己的無断２次使用は不許可。
ダブルチャージクラブ
＠首謀者、eｋ-10stとやま
参照URL
------------------------------------------------------------
↑En,↑
The original concerning Nissan and the pao is an offer from my Brog 
article. 
The retouch request and the correction edit are hoped for if necessary 
because the original is Japanese. 
The use permission by GFDL has been put out and see reference URL, please. 
･Indication rule to article on Nissan pao. 
1 and public organization contribution condition of Wikipedia GFDL OK 
condition. 
Only "Use with GFDL" is allowed. 
Only condition 2(I) and the original person in question can use the 
original, and contribute. 
It needing becomes condition 2(Ro) and a pertinent matter. 
It allows it the encouragement as for the postscript and the retouch. 
Or, it can be a reprint by the origin of this original person in 
question allowance. 
Use of condition 3 the second without permission self-regard is not 
permitted. 
Double charge club
@ mastermind and ek-10st Toyama 
・Here referring ahead.
--ek-10st Toyama 18:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nissan Pao 

message: The original writer's responsibility edit. 
The original edition translation was reviewed. 
--ek-10st Toyama 20:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nissan Pao Se Ededit 

message: I redid this article, as good as I could, in the manner I treated the Nissan Be-1 some months ago in order to make it more readable. Unfortunately there were some details in the options list I had to delete, as it was impossible (for me) to make head or tail out of them ("Bakery soft headed business"??). Also, www.carfolio.com lists the Pao as having rear drum brakes, not discs, as originally stated in the first paragraph.
--328cia (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rework Nov 22, 2007
Talk:Julianna Rose Mauriello

message: Why is there a redirect from the actress Mauriello to her famous character Stephanie? She did more than just Stephanie on LazyTown. OK, she is known for that but this is not all. SHouldn't there be a difference between a person and a character? 2003:E4:BF48:7518:B5CC:8F2C:B53C:C7 (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?
Talk:Albuquerque Isotopes

message: Years before the Simpsons ran an episode where Duff were going to move the Springfield Isotopes to Alburquerque. Theladfromtheeast (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Simpsons 

message: --Lexein (talk) 13:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Hollywood-style Lindy Hop

message: PlainJane 13:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: were are the resources for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twobarbreak (talk • contribs) 05:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a recent this doesn't simply live as a "Variant" in a section of the Lindy Hop article? Jelleecat (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this need to be a distinct article? 

message: Merged to Lindy_Hop#Hollywood-style_Lindy_HopVmavanti (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Effector cell

message: This contradicts the T helper cell article which says T helper cells are sometime known as effector cells, doesn't it?
* I fixed it a little. It's better than before, but I'm not sure it's accurate. Anyone with more knowledge can improve it. I think this article should rather say less and just link you to the different types of effector cells. Ortho (talk) 02:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs help

message: This article is written by someone who THINKS he/she is an expert on the subject, but hasn't got a clue what Wikipedia is all about. Shame on you, lazy person!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talk • contribs) 18:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNS??? MHC??? LAK???
Talk:Kia Pride

message: "Reproduced and launched from 2005.(see also from Kia Rio)" was in the main article.  Did this mean the Rio was produced until 2005 or that the Pride was reintroduced in 2005?  I took it out, but clarification would be useful if this is true.  A quick search yielded a 2005 Kia Pride from Iran (http://www.carsurvey.org/review_75089.html).  Any further information on this would be useful. Christopher Poole, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.94.17 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Saipa produced the Pride until 2005 when they started building the Rio and introduced a new model based on the Pride. 75.33.80.247 08:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2 

message: Removed a seemingly random line that mentioned the Kia Rio, and described performance in relation to rival vehicles without any references. 81.77.162.63 18:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 3 

message: Does anyone else think that this article needs extending? Or is there just not much information on his car? Chevymontecarlo (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extend the article?
Talk:1829 in rail transport

message: An anon added the following:
:?? 1st test of 'Tom Thumb' on August 24, 1830 >http://www.prrths.com/Hagley/PRR1830%20June%2004.wd.pdf
I'm inclined to believe the difference since I've found other items on Rivanna's anniversary pages that were incorrect, but I need to view this reference and I'd like to find a couple other references first. Slambo (Speak) 10:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to verify Tom Thumb data with other references 

message: The Rainhill Trials were an important competition in the early days of steam locomotive railways, run in October of 1829 near Rainhill (just outside Liverpool).
When the Liverpool and Manchester Railway was approaching completion, the directors of the railway ran a competition to decide whether stationary steam engines or locomotives would be used to pull the trains. The Rainhill Trials were arranged as an open contest that would let them see all the locomotive candidates in action, with the choice to follow.
Ten locomotives were entered, but on the day the competition began -- 6 October 1829 -- only five locomotives actually began the tests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainhill_Trials
In 1829 between the 6th. and the 14th.October, the Rainhill Trials took place on the recently completed Liverpool to Manchester Railway.
The purpose was to find a successful locomotive that would get rid of the frequent problems that were occurring all over the country.
The railway company offered a prize of £500 for the winner.
The successful locomotive was built at Stephenson’s works in Newcastle.
It was not the first locomotive in the world and yet it became the most famous.
Its name was the “Rocket” and its success removed from anyone’s mind the doubts over the future of the railway locomotive.
http://website.lineone.net/~desmondodonnell/Great%20Northumbrians.htm
The day of trial was changed from the 1st to the 6th of October, in order to give the new engines time to get in good working-order.
http://www.history.rochester.edu/steam/brown/chpt11.html
October 6-14, 1829 Locomotive trials are held at Rainhill, near Liverpool, Great Britain, to select the best design for the Liverpool & Manchester Railway.
Among the Americans present are George Brown and Ross Winans of the Baltimore & Ohio, and E.L. Miller, representing the South Carolina Canal & Rail Road.
http://www.nrhs.com/almanac/rr-almanac-1820-1839.pdf
Wdew 14:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: October events: Rainhill Trials: dates:

message: There are many links that containing several different dates of the race between Tom Thumb (locomotive) and the horse. Wich date is correct August 18 1830        or September 18 1830     or August 25 1829 ? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 14:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This question has been put to several forum if you know the answer please reply on Talk:Tom Thumb (locomotive)-- PBS (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which date of the race is correct?
Template talk:POV statement

message: I think it is a bit too small and the brackets are too close to the text -- Snailwalker | talk 13:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at my original version, in the history, you may wish to adapt it. Computerjoe's talk 19:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I like that one better, but it would be nice to have someone else comment on this -- Snailwalker | talk 19:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was edited by User:HereToHelp as it was too lengthy. Perhaps a change to 'neutrality disputed. see talk.'? Computerjoe's talk 20:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Bracket spacing can be adjusted with   (thin space). For example, [ neutrality disputed ]. Thin spaces are sometimes used around em dashes. I don't know how compatible they are across browsers. Experiment and see. — mjb 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not supported by all browsers and display inconsistently across those that do recognise them. — Saxifrage ✎ 05:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates.  I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Wikiproject Inline templates'' proposed

message: Any objection changing the category here to :Category:Articles with minor POV problems like the other inline neutrality templates?--BirgitteSB 17:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:WWE Insurrextion

message: I have put a {merge} item as these are both British PPV events and they should be merged. 86.20.53.195 16:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I object, they are seperat PPV's. TJ Spyke 23:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Aurora Engine

message: Aurora has been rewritten for NWN2. The new engine is called Electron —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.36.47.192 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Electron

message: Aurora engine → Aurora Engine – Requesting a move to capitalize this article in accordance with official BioWare sources (, ) --Muchness 23:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: KOTOR is using the Odyssey engine, not Aurora. It is however, using a simplified D20 system. The error has been removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ME$$ENGER (talk • contribs) 06:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  However, KotOR's Odyssey engine is based on Aurora.  I will add a note concerning this.  --DarthMuffin 02:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong info regarding to KOTOR 

message: What am I looking at? I just want a good game engine!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.205.248 (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:Chlorr of the Mask

message: I suggest that this be merged with the other Old Kingdom characters, particularly since there is not really enough information for more than a stub regarding Chlorr herself. Other characters might include Sabriel, Lirael, Terciel, Touchstone, Sameth, Ellimere, Sanar and Ryelle, the Disreputable Dog, Mogget, Kerrigor, and Hedge. The names of the characters included in that comprehensive page would redirect to the correct area in the comprehensive page. Comments? Abhorsen327 13:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge 

message: Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge this article into another one. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Kerrigor

message: I suggest that this be merged with the other Old Kingdom characters. Other characters might include Sabriel, Lirael, Terciel, Touchstone, Sameth, Ellimere, Sanar and Ryelle, the Disreputable Dog, Mogget, Chlorr of the Mask, and Hedge. The names of the characters included in that comprehensive page would redirect to the correct area in the comprehensive page. Comments? Abhorsen327 13:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Merge 

message: To be honest I don't recall the chronology, so I can suggest the resolution, but the first part of the article says the Abhorsen Terciel banished Kerrigor, and then the second section says that 'Many Abhorsens ... including Terciel' attempted to destroy him. But Terciel was one of the most recent Abhorsens. -  Kvetch 23:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Terciel was one of the many Abhorsens who tried to destroy Kerrigor and failed (because Kerrigor's body was intact.) Since Kerrigor again could not be destroyed, Terciel used the next best solution: to banish him deep into Death. At the beginning of Sabriel Terciel mentions that he "chained [Kerrigor] beyond the [N]th Gate." If this ambiguity also exists in the text, it can be corrected. * We have the technology. We can rebuild it. Faster, smarter, clearer :) * Nihiltres 02:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reworded some sentences, hope that's clearer :D -- Angela 22:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: I'm posting this as a note, since this will have been the umpteenth time that someone has incorrectly changed the spelling of Rogirek, the right spelling of the original name of Kerrigor, to Rogirrek, a literal reversal of the word. In Sabriel, my version being a North American Harpertrophy paperback, Kerrigor's original name is spelt Rogirek - it appears that the extra "r" was addded in Kerrigor to make it slightly easier to pronounce than "Kerigor."
Please, please, do not change the spelling of Rogirek after I now change it back! Nihiltres 14:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rogirek, not Rogirrek! 

message: This isn't a problem with the article, but a general question.  How could Kerrigor (greatest of the Greater Dead) defeat Mogget/Yrael (one of the nine)?  Kerrigor had great power, but his consumption of an immortal entity confused me.  Any thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.82.82 (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps Mogget tricked him?  After all, there was still the small Mogget-spark in Kerrigor that allowed Sabriel to bind them both.  My guess is that Mogget intentionally pretended to be finished earlier than he really was, either meaning to let Sabriel perform the binding, or hoping to catch Kerrigor unawares later.Meichigo (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict with Mogget 

message: Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge this article into another one. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Seliger Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH

message: This page has had an NPOV tag since January of 2005, with no discussion as to why; the tag was added by User:Poccil, who apparently stopped editing in August of 2005 and cannot be contacted.
Unless anyone has a complaint, I will remove the tag within 30 days. DS 13:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Re: merge:
There are not a lot of references on the internet to Berthold Seliger other than those which involve his work with his company's rockets.  His German WP page :de:Berthold Seliger (Ingenieur) has about the same information on it as is found here.  They have no references for his BLP page there either. While searching for references on Seliger, I found those which are now listed on this page for External links--in relation to his work with rockets. It would seem that merging his biographical information with the company's page would solve the problem of lack of references for his bio.  The Berthold Seliger page could then become a redirect to this one.
We hope (talk) 23:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That solution, in this case, is preferable to outright deletion, in my opinion.  --joe deckertalk to me 20:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Carlos Colón

message: Isn't there supose to be "Colón" instead of "Colon"? (the o changes to ó)
:I've changed all redirects as to point to "Carlitos Colón". Changing "Colon" to "Colón" is understandable (there is, indeed, a big difference... better to pass as a descendant of Columbus than as a large intestine...), but the "Carlitos" part most United States readers won't necessarily be aware of. Demf 16:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Random thread

message: He is always known has Carlos Colón, not Carly. The one who is known as Carly is his son, Carlito(Caribbean Cool). I think the name should be change so that it's stays true to how the puerto ricans came to know him by and that is Carlos Colón.
:*I agree, and this deserves a vote... Demf 16:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I agree also, and growing up in Puerto Rico I know that everybody here calls him Carlos Colon, even Carlitos Colon was a more appropiate name.
--Forgotten736 04:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I sense that "Carlos Colón" should be the entry's name. If no one objects, I'll change it myself soon. 136.145.192.75 15:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done... Demf 16:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Headline name... 

message: In PWI it said he was born in 1945. Could someone please verify this.Titan012 (talk) 06:01, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here, "Este viernes (hoy) cumplo 60 años y 42 en el ring..." lit. "This Friday I reach 60 years of age and 42 in the ring...", straight from the horse's mouth. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify, that interview is dated July 18, 2008. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: I see someone previously mentioned "Carlitos Colón."  On the WWC broadcasts that I've viewed tape of (mostly from 1985-1987), Hugo Savinovich repeatedly refers to him as "Carlitos" rather than "Carlos."  My limited grasp of Spanish tells me that in reality, this would make him a junior, not a senior.  Namely, "Carlitos" translates to "Little Carlos" and is the preferred term to a Spanish speaker than "Carlos, Jr."  Then again, like I said, my Spanish is not that great, so feel free to correct any of this if it's wrong.RadioKAOS (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name clarification 
Talk:Lirael (character)

message: I suggest that this be merged with the other Old Kingdom characters. Other characters might include Sabriel, Chlorr of the Mask, Terciel, Touchstone, Sameth, Ellimere, Sanar and Ryelle, the Disreputable Dog, Mogget, Kerrigor, and Hedge. The names of the characters included in that comprehensive page would redirect to the correct area in the comprehensive page. Comments? Abhorsen327 13:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Merge 

message: I just deleted the sentence: The reason for all of this is mainly because Sabriel's son, Sameth, who was Abhorsen-in-waiting, couldn't come up to the task of it all and preferred to stay put places rather than adventuring, and he had another destiny on his shoulders.
The reason I did so was because it was speculation, and not supported by the text.  However, the sentence is not entirely without merit.  It could be reinserted if someone wanted to posit it as one theory as to Lirael's ascension to Abhorsen-in-waiting.Emmett5 16:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant Changes 

message: This isn't perhaps the most encyclopedic, but there should be something about damned annoying she is.  Perhaps not in so many words, but the article as is only waxes about her greate powers, etc., making you think she's actually pretty cool, whereas everyone among my friends whose read the books agrees that she's whiny, self-pitying, hypocritical, and generally exhibiting most of the flaws so prominent in people that age, versus the strong heroine that Sabriel was.
So.  Perhaps something a bit more about her actually personality, not just her background and abilities.Meichigo (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personality 

message: Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge this article into another one. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Jimmy George

message: This article isn't written in a very neutral manner.  It reads more like an elementary school essay, to be honest.  But, perhaps the original author's first language isn't English, which would help explain things.  This guy probably deserves a better entry and I hope someone will help out.  By the way, it says he died by being "smashed to death."  What does that mean?
:Now says he died in a car accident.  Contained annoying repetitions, though I've remvoed some.  Needs work on tone.  RJFJR (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apparently George's claim to fame is that he played in Italy--I'm surprised that there is not a shred of information in the article (besides the dates). And 'in Italy' is a bit vague for that car accident. Also, the history of where he played and who he played for, I find it difficult to comprehend: he played for the police team in India while he was in Italy? Yes, George deserves a better written entry.Drmies (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems most part of this article is written based on one source: a page from Government of India Sports Portal. We cannot expect that portal to provide details like the exact Italian club George had played for. Feel free to add any information on that in the article. It might be helpful if you can read Italian. I found this article interesting while I took part in assessment drive of WP India and keeping it in watch :) Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  italy? 

message: Jimmy George is often considered one of the greatest volleyball players of all time and was a member of India men's national volleyball team. He was the first Indian volleyball player to become a professional and played club volleyball in Italy. He is brother-in-law of the olympian Anju Bobby George. 2409:4073:10B:743:DDE9:3C8C:43B9:E5EE (talk) 13:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimmi gorge
Talk:Rincón de la Vieja National Park

message: Altitude?  Topograpaphy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.61.90 (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altitude?  Topograpaphy? 

message: Last eruption of the volcano was at the 22nd of september 2011. not in 1998 as mentioned. 
Von Seebach is not dorment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.91.73.226 (talk) 12:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last eruption
Talk:National Memorial Arboretum

message: I removed most of the history section, as it appears to be a straight copy+paste from . — sjorford (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The arboretum involves a large volunteer team of over 150.  I understand that it has been largely created by volunteers- need sources.
IceDragon64 (talk) 21:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volunteers
Talk:Nehima

message: I think this should be merged with other artifacts of the Old Kingdom Series, such as the Necromancer bells, the Book of the Dead, the weapons of the Abhorsen and of the royal family, and other such magical objects or tools. There's not really enough information for it to be a free-standing article. Comments? Abhorsen327 13:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge this article into another one. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Lewis Archer Boswell

message: Is the Yazoo River linked to here the one meant?
Rlquall 13:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, at first you startled me, because I hadn't realized that the Yazoo River was in Mississippi.  But I just checked and supposedly his wife was from Mississippi.  After going down to marry her, they then moved to Alabama.  So I imagine that it was during that short length of time after the marriage and before moving that he junked the model in the river. Joshdboz 20:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled