Talk:Hastur

message: I *really* don't think webcomic appearances are in any way notable or worth including in an encyclopedic article.  So they're gone, until or unless someone decides to put them back in. With some sort of justification.Deadlyhair (talk) 02:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As discussed in the 'in the mythos' section of this article: Chambers borrowed Hastur (along with Hali and Carcosa) from Bierce, Lovecraft borrowed them (along with the Yellow Sign and King in Yellow) from Chambers, and post-Lovecraft authors embellished on Lovecraft & Chambers' versions, all of them altering him significantly as they went. While he's changed so much as to be unrecognisable, the shepherd-god in Bierce's story is where the modern Hastur comes from. --Calair 01:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Just Say No|Just say, "no"]]

message: :Image:Hastur symbol.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hastur symbol.gif

message: All of this article below where I've placed cleanup and copyedit templates is in sad shape.  Fanboys have come in and added the same duplicate references over and over, improper formatting of titles, errors in fact, and it goes on.  I think the templates get the point across, but I wanted to point out that someone in the Games subtopic refers to Delta Green as a role-playing game, when it is in fact a setting or game world for the RPG Call of Cthulhu.  I've only not corrected it in case there is by some slim chance and actual RPG titled Delta Green. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dire need of cleanup and copyediting 

message: It seems highly unlikely that the High Priest and Hastur are the same character. 'Celephais' was written in 1920 and Lovecraft did not read 'The King in Yellow' until 1927. Should this reference be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Detective Malone (talk • contribs) 15:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The High Priest Not to be Described 

message: Wasn't Hastur listed games El Viento and Earnest Evans, as well as the Japan-only game Annet Futatabi?  Or am I thinking a monster of a similar name? --D-BoyWheeler  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E42:8150:691F:E8DB:3CA:B2E4 (talk) 23:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  El Viento/Earnest Evans? 

message: It seems Hastur is not mentioned in the collection Can Such Things Be?, nor is the short story ”Haïta the Shepherd” included. That seems to be case at least for the initial edition. Miihkali (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Can Such Things Be?''