Talk:First Vienna Award

message: I just linked this to the German-language wikipedia article. I notice that article gives no indication of sources/references (nor is the topic taken up on its talk page). Juro, you were obviously majorly involved in the German-language article: can you give some indication what you've been using for reference? Given that there are things like precise percentages from censuses, obviously someone has been doing some serious research. -- Jmabel 01:50, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
The problem is that it is relatively long ago that I have written the original version, furthermore I have used quite many sources, various encyclopedias etc. , some passages are simply from books in the library, and some passages are not from me. But I will add the most important sources, of course.
And thank you for help and patience.
Juro 02:25, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: When and in what circumstances was the Second Vienna Arbitration?  Would mention of it be helpful in this article?  logologist 08:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Vienna Arbitration?

message: Thank you for the opportunity of editing this interesting article without interruption.  I suggest that it be retitled to the somewhat more familiar "First Vienna Award" and be proposed for Featured Article Candidacy.  The article appears to be thoroughly researched, seems to have the ring of truth, reads well, is neutral, touches on an important but largely unfamiliar topic, and thus will add something substantial to readers' sum of knowledge.  logologist 11:22, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose Featured-Article candidacy

message: *It has no hungarian references, only from the other side(s). 
*Benes decrees are not mentioned.
*Panslavism also not mentioned, just magyarization
*Many declared different ethnic identities after the border shifted, because belonging to the minority nation implied significant disadvantages: in particular, in terms of schooling and access to civil service positions in both states.
*There is no mention of a proposal of an autonomous Slovakia within Hungary during WWI, wich they denied.
*Subcarpatia was renamed to Carpatho-Ukraine on March 15, 1939.
*the Munich Agreement ignored Poland's requests 
--VinceB 11:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed neutrality 

message: I'm asking for inline citations as too many claims seem to be original research here, the article is written from a Slovak point of view. Please use English sources if possible as the topic is controversial and sensitive.
I also added a dubious tag for "because Germans did not want to live as a minority under Hungary". Saying two decades after the Treaty of Trianon that "Slovakia lost its railways, connections etc." is a bit POV, so a neutral reference is needed for that claim. Squash Racket (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV problems, no inline citations

message: The article states that Sich organization was created throughout Carpatho-Ukraine under "German tutelage". That claim is seemed to be written by someone with anti-Ukrainian sentiments. Sich organization was established long before the World War II to promote a Ukrainian national identity and it had nothing to do with Germans and Nazi Germany. Sich volunteers created paramilitary organization Carpathian Sich due to the speculated aggression as Czechoslovakia was dissolving. The claim of German tutelage is baseless and provocative. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sich as German collaborational organization 

message: Anybody able to fix the following chaos?
Although the Hungarian government demanded arbitration, it had not had have the prior approval of Germany, which insisted on its negative opinion, Hitler's disagreement, Ribbentrop's disappointment with previous negotiations with Darányi and the danger of military conflict if one country did not accept the results.|date=November 2015}} Dr. Martin Fleck (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany's position before the arbitration