Talk:Paperboard

message: Ive Never seen paperboard over 10mm in thickness its more likely 1mm or below and 10mm is 0.394 inch not 0.010 most likely that the Inch measurement is correct as 0.010 of an inch is 0.254mm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.39.99 (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  10mm 

message: The Card stock article does not present sufficient information to stand on its own.  As it is a subset of paperboard, it should be merged into this article. Neelix (talk) 00:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A more obvious merge target is Cardboard#Cards. 88.235.150.249 (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Card stock]] to here

message: I just turned the text "Clearwater", in the section that lists producers, into a wikilink to the Clearwater Paper Corporation page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scixx (talk • contribs) 23:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Linked to Clearwater Paper Corporation

message: "Sometimes it is referred to as cardboard, which is a generic, lay term used to refer to any heavy paper pulp based board." I'd say "It is almost always called cardboard, which is a generic, lay term used to refer to any heavy paper pulp based board." I'd never heard 'paperboard' before (I'm from the UK) and 94 million google hits to 1.4 million suggest cardboard is far more often used. Malick78 (talk) 19:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Term

message: Does anyone have any ideas as to where to list information about oak tag on Wikipedia? I know that it goes by at least three spelling variations: oak-tag, and oak tag, oaktag. Apparently only one of these forms has its own article, consisting of a redirect to Tagboard (disambiguation). I recommend that all three forms redirect to a page other than a disambiguation page; or, if notable enough, 'oak tag' should have its own section in an article or its own article. Because even though it's a commonly-used term, it isn't even mentioned on a Wiki article., save for a one-word passing reference that incorrectly labels oak tag as the material used for manila folders. Thanks.--ɱ (talk) 02:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oak-tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Paperboard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081121092805/http://www.paperboardpackaging.org/student_design_challenge/syllabus/1-%20History%20of%20Paperboard.pdf to http://www.paperboardpackaging.org/student_design_challenge/syllabus/1-%20History%20of%20Paperboard.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110713004736/http://www.iggesund.com/Main.aspx?ID=d3f6ae98-6286-435d-bf6d-99a7ca881cab to http://www.iggesund.com/Main.aspx?ID=d3f6ae98-6286-435d-bf6d-99a7ca881cab
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110605234531/http://www.unece.org/timber/docs/rev-00/12.pdf to http://www.unece.org/timber/docs/rev-00/12.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Millboard now redirects here but the term isn't mentioned in this article.  Is there a place to add it?  RJFJR (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millboard 

message: multi-ply paperboard was used for centuries for bookbinding: handmade paper is hard to make thick, thus multiple sheets were glued together, which describes a "composite material" :-), light and strong, but rather expensive - thus in the American colonies thin wood boards were used instead, as a very distinctive and local way to do bookbinding. Not even mentioning the ancient Egyptian so called "papier mache sarcophagi"YamaPlos talk 18:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hsjsjs,,sks 206.127.137.230 (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not too happy about the 1800s date