lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Consultation on Church Union

message: The editor/author of this article stated that the source for Notable people involved in the COCU effort was http://www.cuicinfo.org/speeches/kinnamon_speech.html Michael Kinnamon's speech "“We Have Come This Far By Faith” Reflections on Where We Have Been and Where we are Headed as Churches Uniting in Christ", which also occurs at http://www.cuicinfo.org/leadership/MKinnamon.html and in pdf at http://www.cuicinfo.org/speeches/kinnamon_speech.pdf.  It says:  
:"Any such list of key themes will obviously reflect the preferences of the list maker.  I am convinced, however, that these seven principles have been in the minds of those who have given leadership to COCU over the past four decades -- persons such as Frederick Jordan, Janet Penfield, Arthur Marshall, George Pike, Peggy Way, Albert Outler, George Beazley, Stephen Bayne, Marian Bass, John Krumm, LeRoy Nesbitt, Margaret Sonnenday, Bill Thompson, Clinton Hogard, Phoebe Hoff, Harold Johnson, John Deschner, Vivian Robinson, Walter Bingham, John Burt, Cynthia Campbell, Yoshio Fukuyama, Robert Taylor, Rachel Henderlite, Clyde Miller, Robert Gibson, Jeanne Audrey Powers, Vinton Anderson, Paul Washburn, Rena Karefa-Smart, William Watley,  J. Robert Nelson, Lois Stair, James McCord, Joseph Johnson, Captolia Newbern, E. P. Murchison, David Colwell, Dottie Barnard, Thomas Hoyt, James Matthews, Doris Pettibone, Keith Watkins, Albert Pennybacker, Jean Caffey Lyles, Lewis Mudge, Elmer Arndt (as well as such faithful observers as John Ford, Joseph Burgess, and the late Jack Hotchkin). And, of course, we have already introduced the former general secretaries.  Please forgive me for having failed to name so many other crucial figures; but even this very partial roll call reminds us of the legacy that leads to Memphis."
There is no indication of their particular notability.  I suggest that this list be replaced with one which only lists individuals who have Wikipedia articles, or who have specifically identifiable notability. --Bejnar (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In accordance with Wikipedia:Notability (people)#List of people, and as per above, I have removed all of those individuals who do not have either a citation showing their notability or an article in the Wikipedia establishing their notability. Some of those people removed may well be notable, if so, either write an article about them or provide a citation for such notability when you add them back in. --Bejnar (talk) 01:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people involved in the COCU effort

message: What are the 4/10 churches that were involved?
HiMyNameIsFrancesca (talk) 02:36, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Surprising omission
Talk:Canadian Baptists of Atlantic Canada

message: Some members of the CABC have been critical of its involvement within the ECM.  While this discussion is relevant, I have removed a blatantly antagonistic link from this article.  I paste it here for clarity:
*Convention of Atlantic Baptist Churches and the Emerging Church Movement - a discussion of ECM infiltration into the CABC
(Ref: 22 January 2008 Version)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.5.171 (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Emerging Church Movement
Talk:Credence table

message: The material I removed, I removed because it is specific to Roman Catholic ceremonial.  It has nothing to do with the use of a credence table, but with Roman Catholic liturgy.  Please argue for its relevance to this article before restoring it.  fishhead64 (talk) 23:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about the credence table. The information you deleted was specifically about the use of a credence table. How can you possibly say "it has nothing to do with the use of a credence table"? Your position is self-contradictory. Please stop deleting relevant material. If you feel the article is too heavy with info on the Roman Catholic usage, then expand it by adding other traditions.  But please, STOP deleting relevant material! MishaPan (talk) 04:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What's relevant about it?
Talk:Battle of Ramsour's Mill

message: I've recently noted in the wikipedia entry on Lt. Col. John Moore that facts are given that appear to be based on two different people. The one who served at Ramsour's Mill was a native of the area, not of New York, as correctly noted here: http://www.carolana.com/NC/Revolution/loyalist_leaders_nc_john_moore.html. I have posted to discussion on that page, but it appears to get low traffic, so I'm also posting here. I plan to revise the John Moore page to reflect only the North Carolina one if I do not receive contrary information in a short time. The New York/New Brunswick John Moore may deserve his own page, but I am not familiar with any facts to warrant that at this time. Ftjrwrites (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with entry on John Moore 

message: I notice a visual graphic that assigns Captain Falls to the 'Loyalist' cause...shows a Union Jack next to his name.
This is incorrect.
He was a Captain under Colonel Locke of 'Whig', Patriot militia from Rowan Co., NC. Was also the Sheriff of Rowan.
Multiple sources available to show him on Patriot side:
"Among the Whigs killed were Captains Dobson, Falls, Armstrong, Smith, Sloan, and Bowman".
http://www.carolana.com/NC/Revolution/revolution_battle_of_ramseurs_mill.html
Falls' son:
"– marched to Lincoln by Sherrill's Ford on Catawba River to a Camp on Mountain Creek –
went to Ramsour's under Colonel Locke and Major Rutherford was present in the Battle in which his
Father Captain Falls was killed,"...
http://revwarapps.org/s6834.pdfSunturtle (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Gilbreath Falls
Talk:Cytûn

message: The name is spelled CYTÛN throughout this article.  But the group's website (currently being rebuilt) spells it "Cytûn", without the capitalization, as does this policy document of theirs.  Shall we therefore change the spelling in this article?  Virago (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cytûn is a Welsh word, which my Collins-Spurrell dictionary translates as: agreed, of one accord, unanimous. It is often capitalized in the headings of posters, articles etc. but as the short name of "Churches together in Wales" (eglwysi ynghyd yng nghymru) it is normally written "Cytûn" in documents. Please change. NoelWalley (talk) 22:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: CYTÛN vs. Cytûn
Talk:Daycroft School

message: Someone added 15 Ridgeway as an address for the school. However, I believe that's the address of the Greenwich Japanese school, a different school. I can find the address of the Foundation in Stanford. The school location is described as "just off Rock Ridge Road", but the school closed in 1991. --SPhilbrickT 15:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: There's a school in Ann Arbor called Daycroft School. While it doesn't have a wikipedia page yet, I still recommend calling this page Daycroft School, Connecticut to distinguish it. 2603:8080:5D12:F389:10EA:9445:D79B:9031 (talk) 16:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page to distinguish from other Daycroft School
Talk:Rajeev Chandrasekhar

message: This article seems to be a direct copy-paste of the person's biography on http://www.rajeev.in/biography.htm  The last version that does not contain a copyright violation is apparently 17:29, 23 July 2007 at which point the article was a stub. For now, I have simply reverted to that version. Then I will look for third-party sources that can substantiate anything the copyvio'd version. EnviroboyTalkCs 07:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google search reveals many possible sources. This article can be moved beyond a stub without copy-pasting anything. EnviroboyTalkCs 08:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:C|Copyvio]] issue 

message: Please see the notice at the top of this page regarding "This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy". Also, anyone is welcome to comment at the report I have placed at WP:BLPN#Rajeev Chandrasekhar. Johnuniq (talk) 08:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP 

message: The positions held section was both unsourced since 2021 and presented in a way that did not improve readability. I've removed it. If there are parts of that section that we have sources for and aren't already mentioned elsewhere in the article, they may be re-added Soni (talk)  15:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "Positions held" section
Talk:The Black Adder (Blackadder)

message: The King and Queen in the unaired pilot are unnamed, and should not be regarded as the same King Richard IV and Queen Gertrude seen in the first aired series. This Edmund was born in 1527, 42 years after the Battle of Bosworth Field portrayed in series one. I don't think they had a solid "origin story" worked out for the pilot. 70.20.161.10 (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (3 years later!) I have adjusted the article to reflect this ambiguity, and also to reflect the historical period; it's worth noting that the character of the Queen is dressed to resemble Elizabeth I, but is not actually named. Wikidwitch (talk) 17:50, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Divine filiation

message: Can divine filiation imply a kind of divine brotherhood ? For instance, under this particular theology, since God is Trinity,  the Father remains Father while the divine Son becomes a kind of brother, while the Spirit unites in universal love and brotherhood. 69.157.229.14 (talk) 02:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Divine brotherhood

message: All the sources and images for this article are Roman Catholic in nature—it seems like an article written for Catholics by Catholics—but it surely this issue can be approached from various (e.g,, Orthodox, Evangelical, Anglican, and even non-Christian neopagan) theological perspectives. 98.91.22.148 (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And the section "Judaism's view of Divine filiation"? is that Catholic? I have not actually checked this article in detail, but feel free to add other sources. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic POV 

message: What does this section have to do with being a "Child of God"? 
--ER 20:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theologians on divine filiation??? 
Talk:Warren Hills Regional School District

message: Since the news article related to Wikipedia has been listed on [Fark], someone might want to consider protecting this wiki. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 06:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been no vandalism till now. If any vandalism occurs, you can list the article at WP:RfPP. utcursch | talk 16:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fark Article
Talk:Drogo Sacramentary

message: — Assignment last updated by Ycanmendoza (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Medieval Art
Talk:Early Christian lamps

message: Hello there! I did some light editing as part of a class project to improve wiki pages. 
As it stands, much editing needs to be done, but I feel I would have to research more in order to do this properly. Generally speaking, quotations require more formatting, and there is too much latin in this page to be understood. The page also retains much of its narrative style, and would benefit from a rewrite. There are also several pieces of information that were not sourced, that require sourcing, and some ambiguous language.
I hope that I have helped. :)
Aflunters (talk) 12:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Light editing

message: The lamp shown in the image described as "Roman oil lamp, around 200 A.D." is of a type made in northern Syria about 400 years later (7th century AD). Combirom2 (talk) 22:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Proteinase-activated receptor 1

message: Hello, I am planning to expand this article on PAR1 in the next few weeks. I plan to split up the information into several subcategories. I will go more in depth about the structure of PAR1, its signaling pathway, and its role in the regulation of blood coagulation, as well as adding more to the existing section on associated ligands (agonists/antagonists). I am open to suggestions, so if there are any topics you think I should address or anything else I should include that I haven’t mentioned yet that could improve this article, let me know! I look forward to your feedback. Thank you. NSLIVITSANOS (talk) 17:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans to Expand
Talk:Evangelical Association

message: Evangelical Association This page needs to be renamed Evangelical Church, its name from 1923 to 1946, when it merged with the Church of the United Brethren.  People will search Evangelical church, not evangelical Association. Wis2fan (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evangelical Association This page needs to be renamed Evangelical Church, its name from 1923 to 1946, when it merged with the Church of the United Brethren.  People will search Evangelical church, not evangelical Association.
Talk:Evangelical Mennonite Conference

message: This article does not discuss the 16 Kleine Gemeinde colonies that descended from the 800 people who left Canada in 1948 and settled Mexico and Belize, who still live in colonies and speak Plautdietsch.  What is their relationship with this group today?198.229.246.251 (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See here: Kleine Gemeinde. Tuncker (talk) 14:34, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Kleine Gemeinde
Talk:Evangelical Methodist Church

message: This page is being censored. Links to key legal actions are being removed by "EMCHQ."
"Censor (noun) 1. an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, [Wikipedia articles,] etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds. [...] (verb) to delete (a word or passage of text) in one's capacity as a censor." 204.65.211.50 (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship

message: Hey EMCHQ: I appreciate the changes, especially if it's true you represent EMC Headquarters. But please try to consolidate your edits into one change at a time. If you need to experiment, use "the sandbox," or make good use of the preview feature. Thanks, and God bless!  204.65.84.151 (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Changes

message: Arthur Slye, a former Mid-States EMC super, died on Feb. 2. He was the leader of the Bethel Methodist Church denomination for 14 years, which broke away from the EMC. The following information from a blog post about Bro. Slye that may be helpful in filling in the gaps on what happened:
"The most amazing experience was the turbulent District Conference in Sweetwater [Texas] shortly after our church had withdrawn, then returned to the denomination. Arthur was nominated for DS along with five other candidates. From receiving only a handful of votes on the first ballot, he was overwhelmingly elected on the fifth ballot, which was nothing short of a miracle for a man so out-of-favor with church leadership. Events soon snowballed within a year when Arthur chose to preach some of his deepest-held truths to the District Conference at Irving. The firestorm of his corrupt heresy trial was followed by the withdrawal of Port Neches, Robinson and Irving EMC. I belive Cross Plains EMC might have withdrawn, too, but can't be sure.  The work of forming a new denomination from three churches was hard work, but exciting.  I would not trade that experience for anything.  Working with Arthur to develop founding principles, a new government structure, a new discipline and the first brochure was a high privilege for those of us who were able to help."   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.65.211.114 (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice tribute, and thank you. Do you have a name, or can you give me a Web site to source this? I'd love to say more about Bethel Methodist in the article. 204.65.211.114 (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bethel Methodist Church

message: A dab is a disambiguation page, see Wikipedia:Disambiguation. What I did was point the link used on the term in this article to an actual article, rather than simply to a dab page. While I understand that "The UMC is not the EMC", there is no page for an EMC, so I thought the other was an apt target. In re-thinking it, the term should go unlinked. Onel5969 TT me 19:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Thank you. 72.182.102.68 (talk) 22:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a dab is
Talk:Evangelical United Brethren Church

message: As a former 1st EUB member, I learned a great deal of the church's history by reading The Bishop's Boys.  A topic which hit home regarded the politics between the church an the Masons.
As a young man, I was so impressed by my uncle's stone work that I asked him to teach me.  His response was a blunt and final, "NO".  That was the last time I saw him, c. 1955.
The Wisconsin EUB had a church camp at Lake Lucerne near Neshkoro, which I attended several times.  That, my catechism and confirmation resulted in being asked to attend divinity school.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PointyHairedEE (talk • contribs) 22:23, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  EUB and Mason Politics
Talk:Flesh (theology)

message: The section is linked to the "Analysis and Interpretation" paragraph which needed to be expanded since 2014. It summarizes many topics which are closely related to the subyect of the WP article: the flesh of God the Father and of God the Son, their dyophyisitism, the creation through the Word-Christ and his Incarnation, the marian dogmas, the relation between soul and body from the conceiving to the last judgement.
Probabibly, it isn't enough. But it also right to give the right to speak to other religions.Philosopher81sp (talk) 17:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Catholic Church
Talk:Frontiersmen Camping Fellowship

message: The title of this article should be "Frontiersmen Camping Fellowship". That is the title on my pins, handbooks and in all literature and on the website. I changed it in the interior of the article but don't know how to change the title.Bubbabear (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to FrontiersmEn Camping Fellowship accordingly. ~EdGl (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Title 

message: When I was a member back in the 1970's, it was called the Frontiersman Camping Fraternity. Does anyone know when it was changed? This article needs a lot more history. AOGmorrisLee (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the name changed? 
Talk:Foundations Baptist Fellowship International

message: This religious organization is now called Foundations Baptist Fellowship International as even mentioned in the bio. Rwils (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: This organization was central to, deeply involved in, and some would say the genesis of, the controversy at Bob Jones University between the President, Steve Pettit, and the board Chair, John Lewis, The Jones family has always been integral to the FBVI despite what the organization states; their HQ is only about 3 miles from the BJU campus. The extreme yet underhanded and often in the dark, almost jihad-like fundamentalism this organization expresses.
It has long been said that the FBFI (and all of its former iterations) is the College of Cardinals to Bob Jones III's papacy.
the current president of FBFI, Kevin Schaal is acting on Bob Jones III behalf. As this is a significant part of the organizations history and as you survey the blog posts of this organization and those of its members, it is clear this must become a part of this page.  TFDrayton (talk) 11:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Jones University Presidential Resignation
Talk:Future probation

message: This article says that “Future probation is a point of view within Christian teaching dealing with the fate of the dead in the afterlife,” but it does not say what the content of this point of view is. Bwrs (talk) 05:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over 10 years, and this is still a problem with the article. How the hell is this stub even on the wiki at all? 2601:204:D97F:320:A163:F251:909A:BC54 (talk) 10:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gelasian Sacramentary

message: ----
The Sacramentary is not roman-catholic : it does not contain the usual "merits" theology nor the "filioque," both caracteristics of roman-catholic theology. The Merovingians, from Clovis onwards, had chosen the Orthodox Church. In Italy, after the slaughtering of pope John VIII of blessed memory, the "filioque" thesis of the Frankish theologians entered the local practice. They are unknown into their Faith till then - thus Orthodox Faith till John VIII. The very best example of that resistance is undoubtedly shown by Leo III of blessed memory : forced by the Frankish emperor to submit himself to that new religion, he refused and published in Rome the famous bilingual Creed craved on silver board, placed on the doors of his cathedral, containing exclusively the Faith as proclaimed in the Ecumenical Counciles since the holy Apostles and shared by all Church Fathers (consensus patrum). It explains why no Italian Sacramentary - nor Gallican of course - prior to the successor of bishop and pope of Rome John VIII does contain roman-catholic theology and therefore, il should not and cannot be called "roman-catholic." Even thought it has been used later as base for the successive roman-catholic liturgical works & books. After all, the Old Covenant books have been widely in use by Christians, this doesn't make them being "Jews" - so the books may be rendered to the original authors, Orthodox, without prejudice for the actual users (thought the Orthodox do use it, too, although in minority), it will only be conform to the facts. jm--91.176.92.104 (talk) 06:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:General of The Salvation Army

message: You are not currently logged in. Editing this way will cause your IP address to be recorded publicly in this page's edit history. If you create an account, you can conceal your IP address and be provided with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be viewed on your talk page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.11.83.101 (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

message: On page 2 of 'Called to be a Soldier 9 rows down it states the Salvation Army is against discrimination of any kind. 
How is pitting the Vaxed against the Unvaxed not discrimination? 71.17.185.192 (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrimination 

message: Totally disrespectiveful staff and actually extremely rude and shouted at a person in serious need.  Jose osei. I had been an international manager for 30 years and without hesitation dismiss such an employee.  stevegryka@gmail.com.   reply 73.168.103.66 (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total disrespect to a urgent call for help. I would never contribute again. Train your sad disrespectful staff. stevegryka@gmail.com 
Talk:Battle of Sullivan's Island

message: The "The battle's pain" section on this page appears to be an unrelated narrative; it has little or no relation to the facts of the battle.
:The section is essentially an personal essay, and, in my view, quite unencyclopedicἲὶῌ. I recommend it be deleted from the article - I'd do it myself right now, but wouldn't want to pre-empt the result of the RfC. Anaxial (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so hesitant; it's gone.  --Richard (talk) 05:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Is "The battle's pain" section relevant?

message: This action is conventionally known by "Battle of Sullivan's Island" -- this name is what is used in history books.  Can the move of this article to "Action of June 28, 1776" please be supported here by citations to relevant and reliable sources? Magic♪piano 02:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for move?