lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:March 8

message: Why is Felix of Burgundy listed as being celebrated by the Church of England?  The Wiki article linked to his name does not specify this, and he appears in the Roman Martyrology and on the OCA calendar. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Felix of Burgundy 

message: this seems to be a private industry initiative.  should be deleted.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  IWCBD 

message: Why was Geoffrey Studdert Kennedy removed from holidays and observations?  His wiki article mentions that he is on the calendar of the Church of England and of the Episcopal Church of the US.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geoffrey Studdert Kennedy 

message: I added a line item for Holi, and then removed it because i noticed it doesn't necessarily fall on the 8th of March during every calendar year (although it does in 2023). I'm not sure what the preferred method of presenting these holidays with "movable" dates should be when there is a difference between the timing on the lunisolar calendar versus the Gregorian calendar from year to year. If anybody believes it should be added back into the list, the entry for 2023 could be restored:
*Holi: also known as the Festival of Colours, Festival of Spring, and Festival of Love, one of the most popular and significant festivals in Hinduism
~Teledildonix314~Talk~411~ 21:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holi
Talk:NTFS junction point

message: Removed as this is incorrect:
* Windows Vista no longer uses rmdir, but still has rd.
: Confirmed on 7 here. 217.50.57.89 (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vista does have the RMDIR command 

message: I noticed a comment added into the page by TG2, concerning sync terminology:
Note ** this "sync" idea is incorrect and should be removed. Sync refers to two distinct files, usually named the same and in different locations, which need to have the contents match. Junction points are references to a set of original files and file locations, not copies of files so this fails the "for all intents and purposes".
This is a fair point, but probably should have been placed here for discussion instead of directly on the page, so I'm removing it from there.
Pj81381 (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sync" terminology 

message: Could some add to the article how this differs (or doesn't) from the other two features that NTFS now implements? Also the "observed effects" section is WP:OR without refs. Pcap ping 09:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One big difference I encountered is with shares. I created a symbolic link to another drive on the same server. It works on that server just fine. However the symbolic link was in a share. From the share, i.e. over the network, it didn't work. When I destroyed that symbolic link and created a directory junction instead, it works on the server, and from the share. However, since this is original research, I can't add it to the main article. --Rsberzerker (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  vs. hard link or symbolic link? 

message: I don't know if this is useful to add in the article. AFAIK, symbolic links (in Vista/7) can only be created with built-in tools by using mklink on the command line, nothing else. Or you need to use external software for that. Junction points, however, can be created using the GUI provided in the Disk Management application (formerly "fileman.exe"). -andy 217.50.57.89 (talk) 11:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbolic links cannot be created with Disk Management; but junctions can! 

message: https://www.howtogeek.com/howto/16226/complete-guide-to-symbolic-links-symlinks-on-windows-or-linux/
https://web.archive.org/web/20170723213916/http://cects.com/overview-to-understanding-hard-links-junction-points-and-symbolic-links-in-windows/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/FileIO/hard-links-and-junctions
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/FileIO/symbolic-links [in contrast to previous link]
These sources seem to imply that junction points are the directory equivalent of a (file) hard link, rather than being a type of symbolic link.  Is this accurate, because it seems to contradict this and other relevant articles on Wikipedia? That, or I'm just not understanding the concepts. ZFT (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junctions vs. hard links and symbolic links
Talk:Gaston Eyskens

message: The end of Eysken's third term as prime minister is stated here as 1972 while in List of Prime Ministers of Belgium it is stated as 26 January 1973. In this article's table I wrote 1973 (because of its precision in the list), but which one is correct? D.D. 23:05, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Russian proverbs

message: English pronounciations: I felt they would be nice to have, but I'm 20+ years out of a Russian class. I'm sure they're rough. Still, it's easier to fix something that's approximately right than to do it from scratch, so have at it!
Brian Rock 23:24, 2004 Feb 23 (UTC)
IMO there should be a wikibook, rather than a "List" of proverbs. Mikkalai 06:05, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: I propose merging Russian proverbs with a similar article titled Russian sayings. Russian Sayings article is a list of sayings and does not add new information about the subject. Both articles link to the same page in Russian Wikipedia titled "Russian proverbs and sayings." USchick (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but as a proverb is not precisely the same as a saying, the article should follow the Russian example and be renamed "Russian proverbs and sayings". Robina Fox (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:List of Melbourne tram routes

message: The result of this discussion was keep.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   19:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Melbourne tram routes]] 

message: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a travel guide. An encyclopedia should include all closed tram routes (e.g. Elsternwick - Point Ormond and the network of the fomer Footscray Tramways Trust). 203.7.140.3 (talk) 01:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recentism 

message: I used to catch a tram to school in the mid-to-late 1980s that terminated at the Swanston Street end of Batman Avenue. I think it was the 78. It got discontinued when they built Federation Square. Unfortunately I can't remember the route name (East Richmond?) or any other details, but hopefully this jogs someone's memory and they can add it to the main article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.76.104 (talk) 09:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That was old route 70. 78 has been the same for quite a long time, and longer than the mid-80s 92.230.239.63 (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 78? from Batman Avenue through South Yarra 

message: at item 6, Brunswick tram depot, but I don't know what data belongs to which columns Quebec99 (talk) 20:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table askew
Talk:Chinese martial arts

message: "The existence of qi as a measurable form of energy as discussed in traditional Chinese medicine has no basis in the scientific understanding of physics, medicine, biology or human physiology.[47]" The cited source is  " Ernst, Edzard; Simon Singh (2009). Trick or treatment: The undeniable facts about alternative medicine. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393337785." Why is it necessary to include this statement? You might as well include the statement that "however Western science is limited by the tools it has with which to examine the world, as it always has been". Qi of course does have it's "basis" in spiritual and religious understanding of many religions and yogic practices. 83.84.100.133 (talk) 11:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Qi and Western science

message: Have 3 kids need training no phone to contact need them to become experts JoeanaLGarza (talk) 02:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Training 

message: Many moons ago i contributed to Wikipedia almost daily, I enjoyed doing so and it was therapeutic for a person who had just discovered I will be disabled for life. Then it became an arduous and anger inducing chore because of the dogged manner in which Wikipedia's self-appointed police would pock every sentence with citation needed tags and the entire page would be marked for deletion. Now it is common to find unsourced material, pages that have been flagged as containing: unsourced material, self published work, citation needed etc. some of which date back years and yet nothing is done about it. Why? 2600:1700:8A90:ECF0:5456:2293:933F:B3B0 (talk) 05:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Material has not Been Addressed 

message: This article speaks as if Chinese is a language and it would be nice to specifically state Cantonese or Mandarin for the etymology aspects. 12.149.115.58 (talk) 02:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantonese and Mandarin
Talk:Monica Bellucci

message: The article will be split as it is getting lengthy. The filmography content will soon be removed. Oroborvs (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: Concerning the website monicabellucci.net, which someone added in the external links, I deduce that it is not the official site as it is claimed, but a fansite. Indeed, Vanity Fair France published in April 2016 that Monica Bellucci's Parisian agency Karin Models had just opened an Instagram account for her. We can already see who manages this Instagram account. It is also stated in this article that she "doesn't even have an official Facebook account."  There's the IMDb logo on the contact page of monicabellucci.net:  If monicabellucci.net is the official website, then a quick check on Google shows that two Facebook accounts are linked to this website: one with 2.4 million followers and another with 408k followers. In the "About" tab of these Facebook accounts, we find the email address to contact monicabellucci.net as well as the web address of the site  . In this "About" tab, by clicking on "Page transparency" > "See all": People who manage this Page. Primary country location for people who manage this Page includes: Turkey (9) for one, and People who manage this Page. Primary country location for people who manage this Page includes: Turkey (6) for the other. In "About" > "Page transparency", from the Facebook account with 2.4 million followers, it is written: "Created - Unofficial: Monica Bellucci April 6, 2016". Oroborvs (talk) 18:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website 

message: I removed a source I believe is irrelevant to Bellucci; we don't need to state Persian is spoken in Iran here (diff of removal).
 Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed source
Talk:B-52 (hairstyle)

message: I cut "called a B52"- is there any reason to repeat this?
:No, well spotted, it was my error. Mark Richards 02:05, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: I always thought it was named B-52 because it resembles a billowing mushroom cloud from a nuclear bomb (delivered by a B-52). There is really nothing distinctive about the shape of the  B-52's nose cone, nor does the hair style resemble it. -- Paul Richter 01:47, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nose cone?
Talk:Boeing–Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche

message: Surprised to see no mention of the fictitious depiction in Hulk, but added a reference with screenshots from the movie in any case. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because a fictional rendering is not really notable, if it was a real aircraft it might be added to Aircraft in fiction rather than here. I have removed it. MilborneOne (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As per WP:AIRPOP these go in Aircraft in fiction, not in the aircraft type articles. It is already there at Aircraft_in_fiction#RAH-66_Comanche. - Ahunt (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hulk (2003 film) 
Talk:Acetazolamide

message: Prevention, not just treatment, is an FDA approved indication for acetazolamide. Should be added, shouldn't it. See: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2016/the-pre-travel-consultation/altitude-illness JuanTamad (talk) 01:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Prevention of acute mountain sickness
Talk:Olympic Peninsula

message: I removed Gig Harbor from the list of cities as it lies on the Kitsap Peninsula as opposed to the Olympic
Olympia is at the crotch of the peninsula and is also eponymous with the peninsula so it should be on the list, no? Matt gies 04:08, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that Hood Canal is part of Puget Sound, according to the USGS and most scientific or technical definitions (see both pages for references). In common usage it seems that many people think of the two as separate inlets rather than two arms of the same larger waterbody. Currently both this page and the Kitsap Peninsula page say that the Kitsap Pen. is part of the Olympic Pen. I have not come across this definition before. Searching for definitions, all I find are ones that say Hood Canal is the eastern boundary of the Olympic Peninsula and the western boundary of the Kitsap Pen. Neither peninsula page has any references at all. I'm going to ask for the source of the idea that Kitsap Pen. is part of the Olympic Pen. Pfly (talk) 05:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried to find some evidence for the phrase "Port Angeles, the Peninsula's second largest town, was once designated as The United States Auxiliary Capitol", but all a search turned up was a series of tourist information pages that had the exact same wording, and none of which had any sources themselves. The only references to any U.S. Auxiliary Capitol were in these web sites, referring to Port Angeles. So is this reliable information, or should it be deleted?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.65.197 (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't even exist on the Port Angeles page. I added a "citation needed" tag, but now I'm just going to go delete it. If it's not made up, someone else will have to prove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.109.61 (talk) 04:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Port Angeles = U.S. Auxiliary Capitol?
Talk:Amos Meller

message: This page was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in May, 2004. The result of that discussion was to keep the article. For an archive of the discussion, see /Delete.
---- 
To my knoledge and according to the UN site the UN does not have an anthem. I don't know this person and maybe the autor wanted say that he wrote a hymn to the UN.  Didn't found any hint on the Hebrew wikipedia (the page "Amos Meller" is void, but I can't transliterate his name and even if I could I don't understand Hebrew ;-( ) nor on the net.  Could someone give me more informations?
Schopenhauer 04:21, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Angela Davis

message: I think the info from these sources is notable enough to be included:
Video at this link, which is the primary source: 
https://www.pbs.org/weta/finding-your-roots/watch/episodes/and-still-i-rise
These are secondary sources which reference the primary source:
https://www.salon.com/2023/02/22/civil-rights-activist-angela-davis-learns-surprising-genealogy-on-finding-your-roots/
https://www.today.com/popculture/tv/angela-davis-finding-your-roots-mayflower-ancestors-rcna71700
https://www.foxnews.com/media/former-black-panther-angela-davis-shocked-learn-descendant-mayflower
SquirrelHill1971 (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this information should be added to the article, but the article appears to be locked from editing. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 23:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page has a WP:SILVERLOCK so to edit this page you will have to create a Wikipedia user account, make 10 edits elsewhere, and wait about 4 days to edit this one. -Location (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Done. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rabihm24 (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Feminist Philosophy
Talk:Altaf Fatima

message: I have some interest to keep this text and probably redistribute it via my userpage or at some website, always under the terms of GFDL. However, the author is anonymous and his/her talkpage contains a message by snoyes regarding vandalism. So, I am afraid there is a high probability this text to be a copyright violation or something similar. How can I be assured it is really licensed under GFDL and what should I do before trying to re-publish it? Optim 05:20, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for the info! Optim 05:53, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Altaf Fatima - It may be beautiful, but it says nothing. Darkcore 05:08, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:11th century in Canada

message: I don't think 1367 items belong here.  RickK 05:28, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Am I the only one who finds it strange 57 year old Gudrid is giving birth? WilyD 14:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gudrid

message: Uhmm Canada didn't exist in the 11th century!!--Sonjaaa 16:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: problem
Talk:Hillcrest High School (Ottawa)

message: The principal has changed, the current one is being petitioned to be removed for racism and threats against students. 6/22 174.94.17.153 (talk) 23:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal
Talk:Main Page/Archive 13

message: Hm. I moved New Orleans Mardi Gras into the article space this morning, at about 13:50 UTC. I had created a rough draft of it in my user space at User:Infrogmation/New Orleans Mardi Gras back on the 14th. It appears on Special:Newpages not at all, at either time or title. Should it have? Wondering simply, -- Infrogmation 18:36, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  New page moved from User space not on newpages 

message: *See Wikipedia talk:Main Page. Optim 02:34, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: All main pages seem ugly to me

message: See Wikipedia:Plain vanilla main page. Optim 02:55, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plain vanilla main page 

message: We've jumped the gun (sorry) on this one, to the tune of a month. The shooting was 23.Mar.1994. However, 23.Feb.1993 was the Billionaires' Banquet -- which is probably worth an article of its own (and ψ5 from my account to anyone who does). –Hajor 18:27, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Colosio
Talk:Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta

message: I just wanted to say the confusion about his death date was caused by a local news channel that just passed a Luis Donaldo Colosio: ten years after special where they stated this week it was his tenth year death anniversary. Sorry for the mishap!
Antonio Mr. Mishap Martin
:Dude! Change news channels!! Were they the source for the very odd "flown to Houston in an air ambulance" claim, too?  (Houston from Tijuana? With half his brain hanging out à la JFK?) In any case, it inspired you to start the article, which is what it's all about. Cheers! –Hajor 13:51, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date

message: These song lyrics, con la cola entre las patas, is it reproduced here with permission?  I'm going to say probably not, so I'll comment it out.  –Andyluciano 04:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song lyrics and legal issues 

message: To say there was no foreign press coverage is incorrect.  A reporter and photographer from the San Diego Union-Tribune were there and witnessed the events in Lomas Taurinas.  
I know because I was the reporter.
Galan98 (talk) 03:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  press coverage of Colosio assassination 

message: I will be translating part of a section from the Spanish Wikipedia that I think gives readers a bit more context into why this candidate was important in the history of Mexico and remains a huge figure in the popular imagination. For my generation, he was a JFK/Nelson Mandela/Obama type figure, while his predecessor was more akin to a Nixon. The English article currently doesn't really get past a cursory explanation of the politics at hand. There are streets and monuments all over Mexico named after the guy, so I want the reader to have a better idea of why.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aozeba (talk • contribs) 10:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating From Spanish Wikipedia 
Talk:List of urban public parks and gardens in Hong Kong

message: Sorry, I just wanted to revert my edit, but you were faster. --Patrick 10:45, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: According to the Full list (look under "Public pleasure grounds (other than bathing beaches)") given in the external links section, there are more than 1000 parks of varying size. Surely many of them are too small and insignificant, but is there any criteria for inclusion in this list? --Quest for Truth (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria 
Talk:University Library

message: I undeleted this. The University Library is known simply as the "University Library" like Oxford's is simply known as the "Bodleian (sp) Library". So for the time being is a valid redirect. Of course I can comtemplate it being used as a disambiguation page for other significant libraries called by that name, if there are any. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 12:10, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Currently, there are no votes to keep and the 5 day period has passed. --Jiang 00:31, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It got recreated, so I undeleted this talk page too. The redirects for deletion talk was not archived, as far as I can see, so I can't tell if there were any valid reasons for deletion. I personally don't count reasons limited to "but the University Library could be any university library because of its generic-sounding name, so delete" as valid - they ignore the point I raised above. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 11:28, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I looked up the RfD page. The entry was removed at this diff http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_deletion&diff=2104935&oldid=2104907 with the summary comment with the summary comment Ownage & AOLiza kept. Jet Li (Martial Arts Masters) deleted - i.e. a totally misleading comment - probably just a mistake on Angela's part because it is the same as the previous comment.
From Redirects for deletion:
*University Library --> Cambridge University Library.   
- ** Inappropriate redirect as Cambridge University Library isn't the only University library. Angela. 20:41, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Per WP:DAB: "Do not add a link that merely contains part of the page title, or a link that includes the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion. For example, Baltimore Zoo is not included at Zoo (disambiguation) because people outside Baltimore would not readily identify it as the 'Zoo', and including all zoos in the world in the disambiguation page is impractical."
This article could be converted into a list of all university libraries, but there's already a category that pretty much takes care of it.  See :Category:Academic libraries.  So I will convert it into a redirect.  This article might have been okay if it listed libraries that are actually called "University Library" without further wording (e.g. "University Library, Oxford"), but that's not what this page did, and I'm not aware of libraries that are named simply "University Library".108.18.174.123 (talk) 01:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to redirect.108.18.174.123 (talk) 01:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This disambiguation page seems messed up
Talk:Lake Pleshcheyevo

message: The Lake Pleshcheyevo is by no means "one of the largest lakes in Russia" ! — Monedula 12:14, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk