lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lincoln/Vote

message: :Agree - My points are listed above in the sections Issue and Proposal. Agriculture 7 July 2005 15:28 (UTC)
:Agree - much more useful to go to disambiguous page geodynamo 7 July 2005 15:33 (UTC)
:Agree - Lincoln, Lincolnshire is more in keeping with other city naming conventions. Shsilver 7 July 2005 15:40 (UTC)
#Agree - Seems rather obvious to me  --Outlander 7 July 2005 15:43UTC)I am sticking with this opinion - --Outlander 14:16, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice 1. [[Lincoln]] should redirect to [[Lincoln (disambiguation)]]

message: #Agree And I agree with Taxman's comment below. DJ Clayworth 7 July 2005 17:16 (UTC)
#Agree, but and Lincoln should be the actual disambiguation page; no need for a Lincoln (disambiguation). —Lowellian (talk) 08:16, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
#Agree. The "Lincoln" page should not be a redirect.  It should be the disambiguation page.  Going through redirects increases response time (on a human scale), so the most typed form should be the main page.  "Lincoln (disambiguation)" if not deleted would redirect to "Lincoln".  And, of course, the current content of the page should be moved to "Lincoln, Lincolnshire". -R. S. Shaw 7 July 2005 19:19 (UTC)
#Agree -this seems like a much neater way of doing it. PeterLean 08:49, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice 2. [[Lincoln]] itself should be a disambiguation page

message: :Agree - but Lincoln should redirect to Abraham Lincoln, with link at top of that page to a Lincoln (disambiguation) page--JimWae 2005 July 7 16:22 (UTC)
::Er, agree means you agree with this proposal, not a different one. DJ Clayworth 7 July 2005 17:16 (UTC) 
:::The problem is this poll was set up with a false choice, giving only two options, when there are several possible other options. —Lowellian (talk) 08:16, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
*Disagree -people searching for Abraham Lincoln will probably type "Abraham Lincoln" and there are several significant other "Lincoln"s which people may be looking for. Lincoln should be the disambiguos page with links to all the possible Lincolns. PeterLean 08:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice 3. [[Lincoln]] should redirect to [[Abraham Lincoln]] with a link at top to [[Lincoln (disambiguation)]]

message: #Agree - this is the most common usage and a disambiguation page adds to response time. We wouldn't consider disambiguating the London article to include every podunk town around the world that is also named London, and nor should we in this case. Rangerdude 7 July 2005 19:47 (UTC)
#:Dude, are you on crack?  Grue  7 July 2005 19:55 (UTC)
#:Type "Lincoln" into Google.  There are six entirely different items on the first page alone.  Three are Abraham Lincoln, three are Lincoln University, and the Lincoln automobile and Lincoln, Lincolnshire, while first and second respectively, only each get one link.  Sounds like at least four VERY common meanings for "Lincoln".  --SFoskett July 7, 2005 21:32 (UTC)
# Obviously.  It's been around for several hundred years more than the others. Dunc|☺ 18:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice 4. [[Lincoln]] should continue to describe the city of Lincoln, Lincolnshire
Talk:Emperor of Austria

message: The article refers to the latest living Habsburgs with 'von' although the use of noble prenouns like that has been forbidden with the end of the monarchy, so their names do not contaiu it. That's wrong in this English version, both in this overview article and in the article of the respective persons. Compare to the german version and you will see there is no 'von' in their name:
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Habsburg-Lothringen
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Zvonimir_Habsburg-Lothringen
and here the law removing noble prenouns: https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adelsaufhebungsgesetz 2A02:8388:AC1:1080:F54C:679A:820D:C8DE (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'von' is not used anymore
Talk:List of mountains in Brazil

message: hey was up people !!œ₠has the correct numbers, please correct whichever is wrong. Thanks.-Poli 2005 July 7 15:38 (UTC)
The information on this article seems correct according to the newer measurements using the GPS system. However, Pico do Cruzeiro, Pico do Calçado and Monte Roraima weren't measured yet. The measurement of Monte Roraima was planned to happen at 2005, and there is a conflict between Internet pages. I'm not sure if it's 2.810m or 2.875m. Fetofs 11:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Ashton Lewis Jr.

message: Tone of article seems very unencyclopaedic. Whilding87 20:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Ashton is in the Roush Racing drivers category. When did he ever race for Roush? IndySteve (talk) 19:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roush
Talk:David Stremme

message: Why is popeye the sailor in the picture with Stremme that's hilarious  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.243.88.25 (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone find a source for David Stremme's supposed feud with James Finch for not allowing him to race his car? I removed it to tone down the POV, but if anyone can get it, great. --D-Day What up? Am I cool, or what? 19:48, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote keep it out even if it can be cited. Lots of breakups are not friendly - that kind of stuff doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Royalbroil 20:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Finch feud 
Talk:Shane Hmiel

message: He was never pronounced dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.93.65 (talk) 04:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was it publicized which drug he tested positive for on each occasion? Peoplesunionpro 03:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed drug test 
Talk:Massina Empire

message: I've changed Peul, which is French, to Fula. No problem with French en français, but it confuses readers in English to have different terms for the same group. If we use a term from another language the natural choice would be to use the Fulfulde/Pulaar term, Fulɓe. A12n 22:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was likely my bad, as I com at this from French history, and so am stuck on Francophone names and spellings.T L Miles (talk) 22:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peul & Fula 

message: Removed from the opening paragraph the reference to Macina, which in its narrower sense is part of the larger Inland Niger Delta. I believe that the traditional Fula area of Maasina was roughly centered on today's Macina Cercle, but in any event is on the western side of the IND, and was an integral part of what we now call the Massina Empire.--A12n (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macina 
Talk:Impeachment in the United States

message: The article focuses on federal impeachment. But that is not the only form of impeachment in the United States. State governments have their own impeachment processes (many modeled after the federal process, but nevertheless somewhat different) as do some native tribes, for example. I think it should be titled "Federal impeachment in the United States". Any thoughts before I formally propose a name change? SecretName101 (talk) 21:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, since there is afterthought content in this article on state impeachment, perhaps we just spin much of this article off into an article titled "federal impeachment in the United States", and restructure this article to focus on impeachment in general in the U.S. SecretName101 (talk) 02:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now too state-heavy. Will be spinning-off expanded state content at Draft:Impeachment by state and territorial governments of the United States, which I am currently developing. SecretName101 (talk) 18:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be renamed???
Talk:Spyglass, Inc.

message: The removed paragraph did indeed violate NPOV policies.  However, the current article does not inform enough on the Microsoft deal.  Is it acceptable to reinsert as the following?;
"After first trying to license the Netscape Navigator browser Microsoft then tried to negotiate directly with the NCSA and finally went to Spyglass. The deal signed was for royalties paid on each copy sold and was extended to Dec 1998. The arrangement for the licence was that Spyglass would receive a base quarterly fee plus a royalty from Microsoft's revenues for the software. 
Microsoft subsequently bundled Internet Explorer with Windows, and thus (making no direct revenues on IE) paid only the minimum quarterly fee. In 1997, Spyglass threatened Microsoft with a contractual audit, in response to which Microsoft settled for US $8 million."
replacing:
"The arrangement for the licence was that Spyglass would receive a quarterly fee plus a percentage of Microsoft's revenues for the software. Microsoft subsequently bundled Internet Explorer with Windows, and thus (making no direct revenues on IE) paid only the minimum quarterly fee. In 1997, Spyglass threatened Microsoft with a contractual audit, in response to which Microsoft settled for US $8 million. [1]"  --CalPaterson Thu 7 Jul
: I've made basically these changes and the article now has a NPOV.  I've also removed the disputed tag, because it appears it really wasn't that disputed; one guy just posted something with a POV.  Anyone disagrees, feel free to add it back and discuss here..  —Cleared as filed. 9 July 2005 04:44 (UTC)
The article currently states that Spyglass did not have a license for the NCSA source code.  That cannot be true, as the Spyglass browser was based on the NCSA Mosaic code, at least initially.  More specifically - and pertinently - it is my recollection (as a former NCSA employee) that Spyglass possessed, at the time of the Microsoft contract, exclusive rights to sublicense the NCSA Mosaic code to third parties.  As both the Regents of UIUC and NCSA still exist as legal entities, I'm sure they have a record of this contract, should someone care to ask.  
The fact that the IE copyright dialog began, for many iterations, with a UIUC/NCSA copyright notice (rather than a Spyglass copyright notice) would seem to support my memory of events.
It is true however that Microsoft sought to negotiate a license with NCSA prior to contracting with Spyglass.
What the cited article states is that Spyglass Mosaic (aka Enhanced Mosaic) was not built upon the NCSA code - not that they didn't have it.  Given the conditions at the time, I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of the article.  Adjectives like 'full-featured' and 'stable' only came to be applied to Mosaic closer to the period when Netscape unveiled their product. The subsequent feature escalation between Netscape and NCSA left Spyglass "Enhanced Mosaic" ironically lacking in functionality for a time.    
Jdmarshall (talk) 09:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liberation Army of Preševo, Medveđa and Bujanovac

message: Should this be UÇPMB? --Naddy 7 July 2005 16:42 (UTC)
:Yes. --PaxEquilibrium 09:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should instead be at Liberation Army of Preševo, Medveđa and Bujanovac - see Kosovo Liberation Army & KLA for comparison AndrewRT(Talk) 19:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  --Dans (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I have added the flag of the UÇPMB, as there are pictures showing what it looked like. The source for the flag can be found here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1353692.stm Overthrow-dictator (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  UÇPMB flag
Talk:Ruth Montgomery

message: According to Ruth Montgomery's book, "Companions Along the Way", her incarnation as Lazarus' sister, was named Ruth, not Mary as stated in her Wikipedia biography. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fiwilliams (talk • contribs) 21:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lazarus' sister 

message: The lead had grown to unusual length and it chronologically jumped ahead of her journism career, so i simply moved it down into chronological order and gave it a new sub-head. No new text was added, and a bit of cleanup was all i did. -- cat 75.101.104.17 (talk) 23:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearranged a bit, no new content
Talk:Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

message: This page reads like a public relations tract.  To better judge the objectivity of the Institute's research, we need transparency and detail on WHOI's corporation-related funders.
Harry FiveEagles (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woods Hole Institute 
Talk:Republican Turkish Party

message: Any article discussing de facto states should have a note or statement mentioning their status. As the article may mislead readers into assuming these are widely accepted and/or recognized territories. In other articles such as the one from COVID-19, all  de facto states are clearly listed for Somaliland, Abkhazia, Northern Cyprus, etc. The importance of this is that Turkey is the only state that recognizes Northern Cyrpus. Part of Wikipedia's purpose is to "...present a neutrally written summary of existing mainstream knowledge in a fair and accurate manner with a straightforward, "just-the-facts style."
The removal of cited information because someone else perceives it as biased violates the 'neutral point of view WP:NPOVHOW. ChaoticTexan (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said at Talk:Democratic Party (Northern Cyprus), it's unnecessary and irrelevant. The opening sentence simply states that this is a political party that exists in Northern Cyprus – the status of the territory has no bearing on that fact. There are several relevant articles where Northern Cyprus' status should be mentioned, but this isn't one of them. Number 57 22:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Cyrpus: Limited Recognition
Talk:Republican Party

message: Ireland
    * Republican Labour Party, Northern Ireland, Britain
      This needs to be changed to:
Britain
    * Republican Labour Party, Northern Ireland, Britain
This Party was never apart of the Irish signifying order and it's birth place was in Northern Ireland, Britain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.67.227 (talk) 20:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change
Talk:Sviatoshyn

message: Dear , , , , 
May you clarify another question?
Ukrainian Wiki has the article :uk:Миколаївська церква (Святошин), which says that the church was on the place :uk:Сквер імені Василя Стуса (Київ) and was demolished in the 1950s.
But sources say it was at Проспект Перемоги 111 and demolished in the 1930s.
*Відбулася робоча нарада з відродження Свято-Миколаївського храму в Святошинському районі м. Києва - Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP)
*Святошин Дачне Селище | Звід Історїї Памяток Києва
Best regards, --TimeWaitsForNobody (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea, I don't have to look into this in more detail, sorry — NickK (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

text: There's some problem. I make references to Ukrainian WIKI, using ILL template, but the articles :uk:Миколаївська церква (Святошин) and :uk:Сквер імені Василя Стуса (Київ) have another information so it creates inconsistency. It would be great if you could correct these articles. --TimeWaitsForNobody (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Nicholas church
Talk:NVFS

message: What does the Universal Connector have to do with NVFS?
Alynna 7 July 2005 17:17 (UTC)
Oops! My bad, I cut&pasted some formatting from an old page and forgot to update that bit. I've changed it now.
I'll try and expand the entry a little later on. RichardGaywood 8 July 2005 08:58 (UTC)
There was already an article on "NVFS" on Wikipedia already, NVFS File System.  Please use the Search Feature of this website before you even create newer articles. -- Vesther 16:21, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Agnes of Courtenay

message: I was going to shoot you a email to copy edit...:— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drachenfyre (talk • contribs) 17:20, 7 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorry adam, 

message: I found another daughter, Alix, who died in childhood, mentioned in Nielen's ed. of the Lignages d'Outremer, so have added her to this article and Amalric's. Silverwhistle 22:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra child
Talk:Cryo Interactive

message: Wasn't this the firm responsible for the Aliens: Dark Horse game?
I'll research this and add it if I can find info.
----
Please add Persian Wars too. -- 00:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, there is Gore:_Ultimate_Soldier.. the same game? But there tells "It was published by DreamCatcher Games and developed by 4D Rulers".  So... ????  --151.38.18.125 14:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect L.A. Blaster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 08:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:L.A. Blaster]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hall boy

message: I think it is highly likely that it is incorrect to state that the name derives from the servants' hall. It is more likely that it is taken from the main hall (great hall in England up the 17th century), which was originally the main living space for the whole household in north west European culture. Separate servants' halls came later. This fact needs to be checked, the earliest usage of the term hall boy verified, and generally the article needs to be made chronologically aware. The structure of the great household was not constant, but changed with every century, and varied from place to place. Luwilt (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Rexella Van Impe

message: Since it seems no one cares can we just delete Jack Van Impe from Wiki?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:48F8:3034:127D:34BF:4830:2569:6583 (talk) 04:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this article should be merged with Jack_Van_Impe. Edrigu 23:55, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was merged, if you check the history: . Then User:Mike walker1 unilaterally broke the redirect ( and ), and the article seems to be in a poor state now. I will restore the version to the redirect. Rexella doesn't seem to have enough about her (independent of her husband) to warrant an article. -Phoenixrod 04:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Zone Routing Protocol

message: I deleted from this article a copy of part of the internet draft for ZRP . This draft carries the following notice:
   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with 
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026, except the right to produce
   derivative works is not granted.
This does not allow modifying the text (since that would be producing a derivative work), so this is not GFDL compatible. --PrologFan 7 July 2005 17:43 (UTC)
This isn't an IP or network routing protocol of any sort, I couldn't figure out for sure what it was but I suspect it's related to bluetooth or similar - needs someone who knows about that (IP Networking is my area) to look into it and provide some context. ~Excesses~ (talk) 10:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Modular arithmetic/Archive 1

message: Hey math folks, just writing to have one or more of you verify the accuracy of my statement:
:"However, unlike clock faces, numbers in modular arithmetic usually start with 0, thus musical set theory uses mod12: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; to represent 12-tone equal temperament."
From Clock arithmetic, and to ask if this should be stated somewhere in this article. Hyacinth 02:49, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you mean, really. "Numbers in mod arithmetic start with 0", you can list a set of reps in any order you want. If you're thinking of the entire set as the orbit of a group action, you can start with any element, 7, 8, ...11, 0, 1, 2, ..., 6. So, my guess is the way you're thinking of it, it's not really accurate. Revolver 03:09, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clock arithmetic 

message: I'm not sure whether it should be under modulo or modular arithmetic, but its use in calculating check digits is important and should be mentioned in whichever article[s] it is appropriate for. –radiojon 01:58, 2004 Jul 31 (UTC)
:Definitely it should be in modular arithmetic and NOT in modulo.  Michael Hardy 00:23, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage in [[check digit]]s 

message: Michael Hardy wrote: The recent edits here are very unfortunate. The same person who was so adamant that modular arithmetic is ONLY arithmetic of congruence classes has now put in this first sentence that contradicts that.
: Dear Michael, you are right. The page the way it is, is a reverted copy of how it was in 2002. I think the purpose of the very first sentence is to intuitively introduce modular arithmetic. I am looking forward to any suggestions to improving this page. Thank you. Oleg Alexandrov 01:20, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Replying to [[User:Michael Hardy]]