Talk:Ire Works

message: DEP are not mathcore. Their myspace says "Metal/Hardcore/Progressive," thus making progressive metal much more accurate.
:I like to call myself an extremely talented golfer, doesn't mean it's true.  They can call themselves what they like, but the guys aren't progressive metal by any stretch of the imagination. Cheers.  The KZA 22:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no way they're prog metal. Just no way. They aren't even anything remotely close. In your eyes Meshuggah, Dillinger, Dream Theater and Queensryche should all be lumped together?--GongAYong 13:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia isn't the place for fanboys arguing who "gets the band" more.  The fact is, you provide no rationale behind your claims at all and you'll be hard pressed to find someone that will agree that the Dillinger Escape Plan are a progressive metal band.  I agree the term "mathcore" is a bit corny, but it is what it is. The KZA 23:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You see, myspace gives each band 3 different options for genre, and "mathcore" isn't one of them. Thats why generally you will find that myspace bands have 3 listed genre names. Mathcore is a progressive form of Metalcore, but I def would not call them progressive metal, it just doesn't describe them properly, and I love the term mathcore as they are definitely one of the leaders of the so-called genre.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.44.16.10 (talk) 12:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Dillinger are definitely not what I would call prog metal. Bands that are hard to determine their genre usually pioneer a new style, but instead of the fans respecting that and praising the band for being that original, they gotta stick with the mainstream and label everything prog metal. If that's the rules you want to go with, fine, but at the end of the day, bands like Dillinger are mathcore. —Vanishdoom (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

message: :Image:AMAZON-IREWORKS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AMAZON-IREWORKS.jpg

message: :Image:Ireworkscover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ireworkscover.jpg

message: Please see WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews, which says not to use star ratings for album reviews which don't use them. Also note that reviews should be listed alphabetically and magazines must appear italicized. Have a nice day, rogues. Chinese lucky strike 23:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say anything about not using star ratings at all. They are optional and are generally encouraged for use in articles. Anything outside of a 5-point of 10-point rating scale is what they're referring to. —Vanishdoom 02:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, read well WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews's third paragraph, it says:
The rating should use the same format as in the review, to accurately portray the score of the review. For star ratings you should use the star rating template, for example, entering , will render: . For reviews by Robert Christgau you should use the Christgau rating template, for example, entering , will render: . Numerical ratings, letter grades and other non-symbol ratings should be shown using plain text in parentheses, like (3.5/10), (B) or (90%). If no rating is given in the review you should use the word (favorable) or (unfavorable) to describe the review, possibly allowing for (ambivalent), (mixed), (extremely favorable) and more, but keep it short and simple. If you cannot summarize the review, just leave this second bit blank.
Fourth paragraph says not to put reviews without a verifiable font and from non-official pages.
For a list of Wikipedia's non-official rating/reviews pages please, check WP:ALBUM#Non-professional
Thanks 
Chinese lucky strike 13:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where's the alphabetical order? Synesthetize (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profesional reviews and ratings 

message: I am almost positive that the track "When Acting as a Particle" is sampled from Harry Partch. Listen to it and compare to the music at the beginning of this video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=mOHBqFevy0k
Does anybody have any information about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.137.22.212 (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampling of Harry Partch? 

message: So I think there's a bit of confusion regarding the guitar work. The article says that Ben played all the guitars on this album, but Greg is also listed as the Rhythm guitarist. Why is that? Did he actually play guitar on the album, or is this just a big piece of misinformation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ICommandeth (talk • contribs) 03:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greg playing guitar?