lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sucos of East Timor

message: This article is completly wrong. Check UNMISET information. These are subdistricts, not municipalities. The Sucos would be closest to sth like a municipalities. Anyhow there are only 65 subdistricts and the former map showed old borders under Indonesian occupation. There was a change inb 2003. Even the naming kotamadya was Indonesian. J. Patrick Fischer 08:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the wrong information, the article should be moved to Sucos of East Timor. Check for this and expanding this article :de:Liste der Sucos Osttimors or :nl:Lijst van sucos van Oost-Timor. J. Patrick Fischer 09:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, Patrick. I've expanded from the Dutch site of Wikipedia but I just want to re-verify in case that those are actually all of the 443 "sucos". Johnluisocasio 13:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that municipality is a better term for suco than village, especially as they cover a wide area with a number of villages (aldeias) within them. For example the village of Fatubessi is in the municipality of Fatubessi, along with five other villages. --Bejnar (talk) 04:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and no. There are plans to change the status of districts into municipalities. Sucos could be a village, several villages together, a part of a village, a part of a city... . All scientific and governmental papers I know are translating sucos into villages, but I would say "sucos" are "sucos". ;-) --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 05:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Municipalities

message: There are 10 new sucos and 8 new aldeias in TL. Please compare to German articleDirecção-Geral de Estatística: DILI EM NÚMEROS 2016, S. 3, abgerufen am 8. März 2019.Direcção-Geral de Estatística: Timor-Leste in Number 2017, abgerufen am 8. März 2019. --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 19:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up, Patrick.  I will try to update the article shortly. Bahnfrend (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are 10 new sucos and 8 new aldeias in TL.
Template talk:Rise of nationalism in the Balkans

message: Sorry for the missing code, Niko. Never was much of a programmer. ·ΚέκρωΨ· 11:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't let it happen again or I'll have the Culpa Code Cabal sue you! NikoSilver 11:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ,( ·ΚέκρωΨ· 11:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mea culpa 

message: ...is missing. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 14:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montenegro
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Dewey Decimal System

message: Is the list in the article (which might be better on a seperate list page) a possible violation of a database copyright (as the article itself says copyright is claimed on the system)?  I think it could be fair use as it is difficult to talk about DDC in an encyclopedia without including a copy of the system.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 12:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OCLC has a PDF on its web site that gives the DDC numbers for the first 3 digits of DDC. In their contract, they say that libraries can display the first 3 digits to the public, but no more. So I think this is the allowed portion and therefore there isn't a problem. LaMona 01:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Murasame-class destroyer (1994)

message: This topic has only 1 shipbuilder and I believe this refers to the builders current name and not that at the time of construction, however with Ishikawajima it can be confusing and I may be wrong. Irrespective here are the shipbuilders for each ship, based on the indvidual ship pages and converting to company names at time of build
Hitachi Zosen Corp Ikazuchi
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. Samidare
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. Akebono
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co. Mueasame
Mitsubishi Heavy  Industries Kirisame
Mitsubishi Heavy  Industries Inazuma
Mitsubishi Heavy  Industries Ariake
Mitsui E&S Harusame
Mitsui E&S Yudachi Lǐshìmǎn (talk) 06:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shipyards
Talk:Valhallaorden

message: La Constance is not synonymous with Walhalla-orden. Teuton 09:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Should we note that the Walhalla restaurant in sveaborg traces its name from the Walhalla society? With or without a link? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 07:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the restaurant or not? 

message: There is no evidence that Göran Magnus Sprengtporten was a member of the Walhalla orden. Therefore, I would propose to take out the last section talking about this. //194.136.170.3 (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After some research, I can confirm the above anonymous comment being accurate, according to fresh scholarly work. It seems earlier "research" may have had a minor COI when reporting Walhalla-orden, as they were apparently actively trying to frame it as a nexus of a national myth of origin, so they quite naturally tried to connect every strand that even vaguely fit into that matrix. Sprengtporten being one of them. Apparently he was a mason, but not a member of Walhalla-orden, despite the claims of my referenced source to the contrary. So how to remove the spurious bits? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 13:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I wrote the above, and most likely it should be re-added to the article with proper context that it is in fact the fantasy of a particular Finnish historian with more than an axe to grind and historically not correct. (sigh) -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Göran Magnus Sprengtporten
Talk:Abukuma-class destroyer escort

message: A picture of one of these ships would be useful. Also the box seems to overwriting a lot of things and looks untidy. David.j.james 15:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At least one of these ships was constructed by Hitachi Zhosen Lǐshìmǎn (talk) 10:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Shipbuilders
Talk:Pius Cheung

message: Talk:Pius Cheung
I'm the webmaster of Pius's Website.  The bio has been edited to follow the guidelines where necessary.  No violation of copyright exist.
Cheungpius 09:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Message from webmaster

message: Please check the Chinese characters for his name. Badagnani (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese name
Talk:Advanced driving test

message: This page has little value as it is only linked to from the Institute of Advanced Motorists page, where much of its content is already covered. I believe it should be deleted. --Cheesy Mike 09:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link I deleted a few hours ago was added as part of a broader campaign to add certain links to Wikipedia; it was the only reference the article had. --A. B. (talk) 13:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Western Visayas

message: The Palawan province needs to be excluded from this article and moved to MIMAPORA, because it moved in 2005. The languages, the number of cities etc should be changed accordingly. 
(I wouldn't dare do this myself because I'm not familiar with the area.)
:I believe that the article as it currently stands does properly address the status of Palawan, EO429, AO129, etc. I believe that this info should properly appear in this article. as well as in the MIMAROPA (alias MIMARO) and Palawan articles. -- Boracay Bill 21:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  In my opinion, Palawan should be removed in this region as well as from the Map, because there were no updates to this day.  We officially recognize AO129, and thus Palawan is part of Region IV-B.  Until there is an official update, AO129 stands.  The information about the EO429 and AO129 should stay however.  It's just that, change the Map and remove Palawan because that is wrong as per AO129.  --- Laibcoms (talk | Contribs) 13:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Palawan province

message: Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages in regional articles 
Talk:Sōryū-class submarine

message: The page says "AIP endurance (est.): 6100 nautical miles (11297.2 km; 7060.75 miles) at 6.5 knots (12 km/h; 7.48 mp/h)[2]"  But that's WAY beyond anything any other AIP sub can do, and the citation gated and cannot be read by some people (including me).  I don't believe this, and given the vandalism mentioned below ... 
Kitplane01 (talk) 06:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreasonable AIP range 

message: I'm not very familiar with the imperial measurements, but
"Test depth: 	900’ inch crush"
appears to be off by an order of magnitude. Such subs usually dive to 200-300 metres.
Lastdingo (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, in fact, the imperial Japanese navy has not published max dive depth. It's just a mischief. Once, I removed it. However, it has been repeatedly reverted by Korean..--BlueSkyWhiteSun (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  crush depth 

message: Article states possible replacement for the RAN Collins class,this is not going to happen, Soryu Class will be too old by then, the the follow on class for the Soryu may be of interest to the RAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.31.46 (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exports 
Talk:US-Canadian War (South Park)

message: This article has been put on the 'to-do-list' of the SP project main page.
It truly is awful. I shall do my best when I have the time.
--Naylor182 11:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree, the grammar in this page is appauling. If I can, I'll try to fix up the grammar. Jacob "Badger Head" Morris 07:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Weld Club

message: I suggest deletion of "exclusive" in the first line. See comment at Category talk: Traditional gentlemen's clubs.
45ossington 16:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: early comment
Talk:Old Jarrah Tree

message: While place an image of the tree, its not an ideal composition due to construction of the car and buildings associated with the expansion of the shopping centre in Armadale. After enquiries within the Armadale redevelopement Authority its expected to be 3-4 months before the building near the tree has been completed, landscaping isnt expected to be finish for 12 months. Gnangarra 07:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request
Talk:Agnostus

message: This article follows the Treatise in dealing with Homagnostus as a subgenus of Agnostus. There is however an article on Homagnostus as a genus of its own. This needs to be resolved. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 22:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of ''Homagnostus'' in relation to ''Agnostus''
Talk:The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable

message: This has got to be one of the worst articles I've ever come across on Wikipedia. It does not sound like it was written by someone who knows English very well, and it is not very factually informative about the book, its author, its critical reception, etc.  It's just a lot of senseless babbling by someone who seems to have been very impressed by the book.70.150.21.209 (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF?
Talk:Bedfordshire Police

message: The assertion that Bedfordshire Police was "formerly Bedfordshire Constabulary" is not strictly true, as it was formed as a result of a long process of amalgamations, including those of the town police forces of Luton and Bedford. I've dropped it out- pending someone being bothered enough to elucidate the long histoey of mergers and amalgamations!
Stevingtonian (talk) 07:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constabulary vs Police

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Cambridgeshire Constabulary

message: Prior to his appointment as Chief Constable with Cambridgeshire, Simon Parr was a senior officer with Hertfordshire Constabulary. He had a leading role in the controversial decision to lead an investigation into alleged racist comments on the TV programme "Celebrity Big Brother". The investigation cost £14,000 and resulted in no arrests  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coachtripfan (talk • contribs) 16:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief Constable - Simon Parr 
Talk:Cheshire Constabulary

message: The Assistant Chief Constables are Mr. Philip Thompson - Investigations and Mr. Ian Wiggett (temporary) - Neighbourhoods.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.137.45.109 (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Dorset Police

message: This series of edits has been completely reverted. Although it contained some contributions that may have been valid it contained a large amount of WP:COPYVIO copyright infringing text directly copied & pasted from the following pages (and possibly from others):
*https://www.dorset.police.uk/help-advice-crime-prevention/marine/
*https://www.dorset.police.uk/news-information/about-dorset-police/departments-sections/contact-management/
*https://www.dorset.police.uk/news-information/article/11147
*https://www.swrocu.police.uk/about-us/
*https://www.dorsar.org.uk
I have left an appropriate notice on the editor's talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added another to the list above (dorsar.org.uk) --10mmsocket (talk) 07:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted edits due to copyvio 

message: I have removed these under WP:UNDUE as being too detailed, see also WP:DETAIL, also those for officer and staff conduct et. al.. I also have looked at plenty of other pages for territorial police forces, and none has gone into that kind of detail regarding IOPC involvement. The PEEL inspection part was present almost always, though. If this really must stay (convince me :), perhaps a subtopic might be called for. Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed listings under [[Dorset Police#Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) involvement]]
Talk:Gloucestershire Constabulary

message: I am considering deleting the second item in the controversy section.  In short the matter was subject of a complaint which was found proven and the officer received a written warning.    The article is about Gloucestershire Constabulary and what happened at this incident is not part of Gloucestershire Constabulary policy or permitted method of operation.  The officer was wrong and was disciplined accordingly.  There is too much weight given to this relatively minor incident (which was dealt with) compared to the subject matter of the article - a police force with over 150 year history.  Gloucestershire Constabulary have hundreds of thousands of positive contacts with the public each year and a fair balance needs to be struck which at present the inclusion of this item, it isn't striking.  In comparison the first item in this section, around discrimination, could be more fairly argued to be more appropriate for the article as it focuses on an organisational issue which effected many people. Thoughts anyone? Bowchaser (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree (I see you have already removed it). I had already reduced it as it had clearly been written by someone with a grudge. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photography item in controversy section... 

message: Asians except Chinese people were more likely to be stopped and searched despite and the majority of searches 
are for drug users despite the fact that Aisan people are less likely to use drugs  
(sources:http://www.stop-watch.org/your-area/area/gloucestershire, 
...https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/health/physical-and-mental-health/illicit-drug-use-among-adults/latest)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.145.38 (talk) 13:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  a page about stop and search 

message: why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SadiqKhanFan (talk • contribs) 21:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  who has deleted my stop and search section?
Talk:Marco Polo Bridge

message: What river is this bridge over?
Furius 10:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yongding apparently. When was the river drained? Drutt (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a picture of the bridge when the river still ran under it, apparently taken in 2000. Drutt (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  river? 

message: * Support, per Britannica, Columbia, and Lonely Planet. Kauffner (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Please add more, older, better pictures of the bridge and lion details.
Please add map showing location in the Beijing area.-71.174.189.52 (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos and map
Talk:Hertfordshire Constabulary

message: The sentence I've just deleted re below average crime rates and officer to 1,000 population was incorrect.  The source actually suggests that 2 crime areas are actually at or just under the national average.  Plus the officer ratio actually shows that there are still around 25% of forces with lower ratios.  The problem with these things is that it is incredibly difficult to compare a force such as the Met with capital city/national functions against a force such as Dyfed Powys Police which has a huge largely unpopulated area to look after.  Makes these league tables a bit meaningless..Dibble999 (talk) 22:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats  

message: Seeing as it's old news, and nothing really came of it, I will move (unless there are any objections) the Merger Proposal section in to the history. I intend to replace it in the long term with a section on collaboration, as the force is moving closer with Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire, and go expand on the history section.
--Strike89 (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging the merger 
Talk:Kent Police

message: This is written by it's author as a "notable or historic incident". It is neither. It does not represent the history of Kent Police and is a single incident in which a person died. Written in isolation, with no other notable or historic incidents it seems that the author has a agenda or connection with this particular story. It's sole reference is another Wikipedia article, no news source or other commentary. I have now deleted it for a second time. Kent6 (talk) 14:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Incident is notable as it is the first fatal shooting of a woman by UK police in 27 years (and first time shooting was deliberate). Notable for that alone. Your user id suggests you have more of an agenda than I do for this. I am now putting this back. If you don't like it, request 3rd party intervention. --Cziltang mexico (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct on the Wiki-only citation, which was a weak reference.  Now updated and strengthened with BBC News reference.  Yes, it was a single incident and may not reflect the history of Kent Police, but regardless of that, it is still a noticeable incident in its own right.--Schrodinger's cat is alive (talk) 08:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of section on Death of Anne Sanderson

message: See WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Wikipedia is not an exhaustive list of every single TV appearance by anyone, let alone a police force. For that reason I copy-edited the list and then trimmed the list down to only what is referenced. Even then it could be considered too long. --10mmsocket (talk) 20:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV appearances 

message: BBCTV just broadcast a clip from "Police HQ in Northfleet".  So the move recorded in 2020 as being planned has now happened.  If someone has details and a source, an update would be useful.  Otherwise I may eventually get round to doing it myself! 
[Also, I don't consider it right that the PCC which is a politician should be included at the head of that list above the Chief Constable; although he is responsible for the force he is not a member of it.]   --Sussexonian (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the PCC / chief constable comment, that's a function of the globally-used infobox. The "electeetype" person is listed before "chief1" and "chief2". If you want to fix it you'd need to modify the infobox, which I'm guess would need consensus. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Force HQ moved from Maidstone
Talk:Lancashire Constabulary

message: The date formed is given as 1974 in the box, is that not just the date for the present incarnation of Lancashire Constabulary.  I would have thought there was a Lancashire Constabulary before that date, just the boundaries have changed over the years.  --jmb 13:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of formation

message: I think it would be prudent to remove the vehicle pictures as they are copyright of Lancashire Constabulary. The uploader has signed them as his/her own. SiLancs (talk) 22:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vehicle Gallery
Talk:Lincolnshire Police

message: Some of the facts need checking and-or referencing:
*Two population figures for the jurisdiction in the one article, 646,000 and 750,000
*Budget of 108.6 pounds.  Is there zero or two or a unit missing
*Sworn members 1,234, in counting order looks like an odd coincidence
Pee Tern (talk) 02:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts - correct ? 

message: you have one central street and a cathedral on the horizon in Lincoln
you need more barriers and far stricter control of traffic
86.141.205.9 (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4390436/Truck-rammed-group-pedestrians-Stockholm.html