Talk:Dan Schneider (writer)

message: This page seems too long for someone who has never actually had anything published outside of his internet site. I would also be on the skeptical side about the number of visitors that the site may receive. I don't know that these statistics are very reliable. 24.8.113.215 (talk) 20:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This page seems too long

message: Both Dan Schneider (writer) and Dan Schneider (TV producer) are, in fact, writers. I suggest renaming this article "Dan Schneider (poet)" or "Dan Schneider (critic)" for better specificity. --JohnnyLurg (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We should leave the article names as they currently exist. Dan Schneider (writer) is not merely a poet and Dan Schneider (TV producer) is mainly known for the the TV shows he produces. Renaming the articles would cause confusion.--SouthernNights (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.cosmoetica.com
*:Triggered by \bcosmoetica\.com\b on the global blacklist
*http://www.cosmoetica.com/B741-DES610.htm
*:Triggered by \bcosmoetica\.com\b on the global blacklist
*http://www.cosmoetica.com/Cinemension.htm
*:Triggered by \bcosmoetica\.com\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dan Schneider (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012204945/http://www.citypages.com:80/1999-11-24/news/dan-schneider-vs-the-rest-of-the-world to http://www.citypages.com/1999-11-24/news/dan-schneider-vs-the-rest-of-the-world
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606054515/http://www.citypages.com/1999-11-24/news/dan-schneider-vs-the-rest-of-the-world/6/ to http://www.citypages.com/1999-11-24/news/dan-schneider-vs-the-rest-of-the-world/6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article seems to have a lot of problems. It seems unbalanced in favor of the subject, and in general it is very difficult to discern the relative significance of the subject. The subject's notability is an open question: he never appears to have been published. The only substantial coverage the subject has received was in some decades-old local arts community news. Claims about the subjects personal life seem to be lightly sourced and unverifiable. I think the article should either be rewritten substantially, or considered for deletion (once again).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbroderick271 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This subject's notability is not in doubt, with coverage of him in The New York Times, City Pages (at the time the sister paper of the Village Voice), and NPR. However, edits over the last few years have removed some of the information and citations which proved this notability. I have now edited the article to reinsert this information and citations, along with adding new citations to support the article and doing a rewrite to clean things up.--SouthernNights (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of Questions 

message: Schneider's film criticism was praised by Roger Ebert, who called him a "considerable critic".[30]
  In 2007, Ranking.com ranked Cosmoetica in the top half million literary websites.[19]
Of what consequence is this? Delete.
  In late 2006 Schneider further expanded his website to include an all film subsite called Cinemension.[28]
This citation is simply to the website that it discusses. Delete.
  Schneider has published his film reviews in a number of online publications. His reviews are also aggregated on Rotten Tomatoes.[29]
This also simply links to the Rotten Tomatoes page, which consists merely of five reviews.
The entire "Media coverage" section should be entirely deleted.
  Schneider's poetry has been praised by Waswo X. Waswo.[4]
What did Waswo say, exactly?
  Schneider was born in 1965 to an unmarried Minnesota mother. Given up for adoption in New York City, Schneider grew up with a working-class family in the Glendale-Ridgewood neighborhoods of Queens. According to his memoir and press accounts, at age six Schneider witnessed a murder, the first of many. During high school, Schneider was a gang member.[1][2]
The second reference is to a primary source, written by Schneider himself. The first reference to City Pages is a local publication and seems to only consist of a blurry image.
I accept that Schneider may at one point have been relevant and no longer is. But his thousand Twitter followers, and Youtube channel where most of his videos have about 100 views, suggest that this is a vanity article for a self-publisher.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.109.228 (talk) 10:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awful article that reads like PR 

message: Footnote 22 appears to erroneously cite the Oxford University Press and publication date of 2016 for the cited work.  The correct publisher is the Manchester University Press and correct publication date is 2013.  See this link at the Manchester University Press website for the cited publication.  []Pbtaylor2727 (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct footnote 22