lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Climate of North Dakota

message: The Extreme Weather section is in no order, unusual formatting, has unfinished sections, repeating quotes, and just needs reworked in general. I tried tagging it but I don’t know what I’m doing and am also on mobile. I came here for a typo but I’m can’t wrangle this. The most I can do is bring light to the issue.
Abigailment (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Eucrosia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2418883. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored, hopefully in an acceptable way, the small amount of information removed as part of the copyright cleanup. It should be noted that formal botanical terminology is necessarily repeated from the source, although of course the rest of the sentence should not be. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Eucryphia cordifolia

message: ChileBosque and Enciclopedia de la Flora Chilena put Eucryphia cordifolia in the Eucryphiaceae family. This article states it as a Cunionaceae (line 1 of this article). Would that be an error?
--Lupo Manaro 15:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cunoniaceae 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 August 21

message: The article was prodded 8/20 and improperly listed on that days' AFD listing. I tried to correct the tag and list it for today. It's somehow gotten embedded in the AFD listing for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronological List of Playboy Playmates. A couple of editors have tried to fix it with no success. Can someone try to get it untangled so it can be properly listed? Otto4711 17:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. → AA (talk) — 17:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[The Garden of Earthly Delights in popular culture]]
Talk:Choptank River

message: Broken links need updating.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.227.153 (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-08-20/WikiScanner

message: Rageross: you did a great job on this incredibly wide-scope story here. Way to go. --Thespian 17:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, good report. The story also got a fairly large article in the Belgian newspaper De Morgen on the 17th, with commentary from the Belgian Foundation spokesperson. So not only English language media are interested in this! Fram 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Irresponsible?  How so?  It's very valuable for teaching organizations not to attempt to use Wikipedia as a PR management tool, except in responsible ways.  It's definitely good for Wikipedia and its future integrity.--ragesoss 23:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mark Penn

message: The page is vandalized as all get-out don't know how to flag!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavelow235 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please just describe any vandalism you see here on the talk page, if you can not fix it yourself. Superm401 - Talk 05:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have reverted the addition of the following copy/paste from CNN.COM ...
"Save it for 2050" controversy
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A policy memo by Sen. Hillary Clinton's one-time chief strategist challenging Sen. Barack Obama's "American roots" make it difficult to close gaps between the former rivals. In a March 2007 memo, Mark Penn, Clinton's former chief strategist, wrote, "all of these articles about his boyhood in Indonesia and his life in Hawaii are geared toward showing his background is diverse, multicultural and putting that in a new light. Save it for 2050."
It also exposes a very strong weakness for him -- his roots to basic American values and culture are at best limited. I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and in his values," Penn wrote.
Feel free to add the information to the article appropriately. Proofreader77 (talk) 19:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Save it for 2050" controversy (copy/paste from CNN) 

message: This article is in need of updates and balance.  Help and comments welcome. Solarium2 (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: updates
Talk:Ramankutty Nair

message: For a one-line stub followed by four source links needs citations? Doesn't seem to be tagged for right reasons. I am removing the tag, as it's looking like the singular most inappropriate tag on WP. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again User:NAHID uses the edit summary instead of the talk page, even when there was an explicit request. This person has found out quite a few loopholes in the policies, and making good use of them to troll me. Its kind of irritating. I hope he starts concentrating more on the articles he explicitly declared to be developing. Sigh. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed? 

message: The article now has quite a bit of good stuff on it. Only it needs a thorough rewrite and ample citations. Any takers? Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More attention? 

message: It looks like everyone has put some work into rewrites, but what about section headings.GarbledLecture933 (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:List of My Super Sweet 16 episodes

message: Some information needs to be added about Stefanie's Rockin' sweet 16. 72.82.200.248 19:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am currently working on updating the page. It's going to take a little bit, but hopefully it'll be better for everyone in the end. --F!ERCE (talk) 12:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Updating
Talk:Elk River (Maryland)

message: Some information about how the Elk River got its name would be helpful.  Were there really elk in the region, or was it originally a foreign word that got mistranslated? Delmlsfan (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: wanna know more about it 2600:4040:A28F:AC00:3413:AD8C:86D8:6B25 (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  elk river
Talk:Game (disambiguation)

message: The character ⅁ (U+2141, “TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL G”) is also called “game”. This must be a mathematical symbol, but what does it stand for, or how is it used? --131.169.184.136 17:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Symbol 

message: I don't know where the idea came from that animals referred to as "game" are strictly food, but where I'm from, they're just wild. Here, there's a Yellow River Game Ranch, and we certainly don't want to eat our weather groundhog, General Beauregard Lee — Supuhstar * — 05:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Game animals are hunted for food or sport, and the term comes from the latter use--game or sport hunting. Any animal that might be hunted for sport is therefore a game animal, whether or not it is actually hunted or eaten.--ShelfSkewed Talk 14:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No representation for wild animal
Talk:2007 Grand Prix (snooker)

message: What happens if two players each win the same number of matches? What if the frame difference is the same? And so on Christopher Connor 21:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question 1

message: Did Tom Ford get his prize for max break despite the fact the achievement itself was not televised? In biographic article about Tom Ford it remains unclear. Because it's written "He secured high break prize but unfrtunately it was not televised". So. He got high break prize but did he get the max break prize. I think it should be clarified. Thanks.
:He became the prize, because it isn't important that it is televised or not. If it's not televised, than that means that no video is available. Armbrust Talk Contribs 23:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question 2

message: Dave Harold broke this record in this tournament, shouldnt it be added http://www.cajt.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Records.html QueenAlexandria (talk 08:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  World record for misses
Talk:Outline of design

message: Is this page really needed?--Viccce 17:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I clarified and reorganized some of this article. Admittedly, this is an interim state and does not currently meet Wikipedia guidelines. Improvement, particularly including citations, are encouraged. —Parhamr 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortcomings 

message: See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines".
The Transhumanist 01:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines" 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Spike Island, Widnes

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) —Guanaco 09:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Back River (Virginia)

message: I added 2 photos to give some visual interest.  We should add some facts regarding the influence of NACA (later becomes NASA LaRC) and Langley Air Force Base on the development and population on Back River.
Due to heightened local interest, some mention of the erosion of factory point at Grandview Beach would be worthwhile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unixluv (talk • contribs) 03:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added 2 photos and a few ideas
Talk:180th Division (1st Formation) (People's Republic of China)

message: I am not a historian, but this article seems to be very subjective.  First of all, I have problems with the following:
"During what the Chinese call the 5th campaign (May, 1950), ..."
Uh, if I remember correctly, the Korean War started on 25 June 1950, so we're a little early here.  Any experts out there?
Aidan Bothwell  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.162.203.148 (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-objective article? 

message: cite note 3 belongs to a paragraph which is completely talking rubbish, Pei shan, supposedly commander, was actually a fictional charater invented in ha jin's book called war trash, i accuse the ignorant writer there of extreme arrogance Btzkillerv (talk) 20:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  totally disgraceful infomation 

message: the article states that high-ranking officers, including the division commander, managed to escape, and at the end claim that the prisoners, AGAIN INCLUDING THE DIVISION COMMANDER were sent to some island. Only one of these statements can be correct, no?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thestor (talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  self-contradictionary 
Talk:Magg

message: wtf is this article about? Doctorfluffy 17:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited the text, wikified, and linked.  I also deleted the notability tag, I hope that's ok.  While not a major character in the series, he was already on the template, and is of some importance. Cbradshaw 21:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Expanded text and removed references tag, as I added a quote and a referral text. ----Cbradshaw 02:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bolster

message: I can only find hearsay blogs online but in Malaysia, a bolster was called a "dutchwife" sounding as one word, stress on the "dutch". Everyone adults and kids had one, a long cotton pillow as in the illustration [at bolster ] – to soak up the sweat & made sleeping easier. The name is not literal or lewd, but using "dutch" the way it's used for "fake" or "substitute" or not real. Examples are "dutch uncle", "dutch treat", "dutch courage" and so on. Ironically, its meaning also implies "bolstering" the missing real thing as in a "dutch uncle" is someone playing the role, an avuncular person, not related. "Dutch courage" is using a stiff drink to bolster lack of strength in a situation. Still can't find an acceptable reference apart from Japanese sex dolls or speculation about wife substitutes, but noted here in case someone can include the Malaysian/Indonesian one with a citation. Also posting this comment at Bamboo wife. Manytexts (talk) 05:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  blogs only but... 

message: This sourceless article could be better served as a paragraph in a mother article. Coin945 (talk) 11:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Bamboo wife]] into [[Bolster]]
Talk:Cabin John Creek

message: The picture clearly shows a lot of water, but nowadays the creek is a small culvert to the side of the road.
Where has all the water gone? Was it dammed to make way for the turnpike?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.182.76 (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of the waterway 
Talk:Cacapon River

message: From http://www.stateparks.com/cacapon.html :  "Cacapon (pronounced CaCApon) is a derivative of a Shawnee Indian word meaning "medicine waters". It refers to the areas renowned medicinal waters, which have been acclaimed throughout history for their healing powers. These waters come to the surface approximately ten miles from Cacapon at the nearby Berkeley Springs State Park."
Hope this helps!  Darci (talk) 20:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:148th Division (People's Republic of China)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 10:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 148th Division (People's Republic of China) →  – WP:TWODAB primary per WP:SMALLDETAILS BilledMammal (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). No such user (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose per NSU. Completely agree. Gonnym (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 April 2022
Talk:The Accounts of Jingkang

message: We probability need people to translate all those books' names from the Chinese link page and expand this one. Thanks. TheAsianGURU 17:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. TheAsianGURU (talk) 06:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, I wasn't even able to find any "lengthy content" of these books in Chinese. English translation will be even more difficult to obtain. Small pieces of the article are around. Collective, no. My work on Jingkang was mainly done from Chinese sites (which had small sections of these books) as well as the Chinese section of Wiki. TheAsianGURU (talk) 00:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Eelam War III

message: This article has very little reference and a lot of sentences without proper citations. As such I dispute the article totally. Seems like a POV article without any reference to a lot of claims. Watchdogb 17:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:The Last Words (band)

message: The article should be put into proper sections and some general clean up may also be needed. --Credema 17:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: Is the name of the band 'The Last Words' or 'Last Words'? Looking at different articles on Wikipedia, they are referred to by both names and looking online, they are also referred to by both names. If the name is indeed 'The Last Words' the the page should be moved. --Credema 00:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: There's a canadian band with the same name. They only had a few singles, though. Here are some links, I'm going to add something to the header.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tree.boar (talk • contribs) 04:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian band of same name 

message: According to Earwig's Copyvio Detector (ECD), here there is 74% confidence that violation is possible between the current version and this. The latter has a section, on The Last Words with attribution to J. Wise, March 2007. When we check article history we find this version on 3 July 2007, which added 3614 bytes. If we compare that version with the given website, ECD  shows here that we had 89% confidence with violation suspected.
The article itself has no in-line citations and is written with content repeated. I am not familiar with the subject and so cannot determine what should be removed and what should be kept.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copy violations? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/66814/20080111-0343/members.optusnet.com.au/_chelton21/1976_to_1979.html#Last_Words (dated March 2007). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Birmingham to Worcester via Bromsgrove line

message: Just wandering what WP policy is on this kind of rail line, which is nearly completely covered in Cross Country Route and Cross-City Line (Birmingham - Stoke Works junction (South Bromsgrove)), Birmingham to Worcester via Kidderminster Line (Droitwich - Worcester) and Cotswold Line (Worcester & onwards)? The only unique section of this line is the mainly single-track line between Droitwich to Stoke Works jnc. I'd assume that the reason this has its own article, is because of the service pattern that follows this route and on to Hereford, although I am not familiar with the history of this line. Perhaps a better way of improving this area of UK rail infrastructure would be to create "Droitwich-Bromsgrove line" and improve the aforementioned articles? Davemnt (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity of Line
Talk:IUniverse

message: :I deleted this  complaining about an experience with iUniverse. I don't have an opinion one way or the other about the writer's experience -- it's just that this is not the place for that sort of stuff. See What Wikipedia is Not and our Talk page guidelines for more information. --A. B. (talk)  17:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: extreme lack of professionalism

message: :I deleted this comment complaining about an experience with iUniverse. I likewise do not have an opinion one way or the other about the writer's experience. However, this is an entirely inappropriate use of article talk pages. Please see What Wikipedia is Not and our Talk page guidelines for more information. Voceditenore (talk) 05:46, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gianni Truvianni And iUniverse 
Talk:Barlaston railway station

message: Is this station closed or has it not been officially closed hence in some way officially open?212.139.127.84 (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The station is still legally open and has a replacement bus service although the platforms can no longer be accessed. Through tickets are available to Barleston including Cheap London Midland Only ones. In most cases it is the same price as travelling to Stoke. 94.192.241.209 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How can the Office of Rail Regulation give annual numbers of passengers using the station since 2003 when the station is closed??Steamybrian2 (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because rail tickets are sold to and from the station; the fact that such passengers must use a bus for all or part of the journey does not affect the usage figures. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this station closed?