Talk:20 Fenchurch Street

message: The citation for the nickname lists both "The Walkie Talkie" and "The Pint", yet this second name was not in the article. When I added it, it was removed. Why? 85.159.85.2 (talk) 10:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years ago, someone may have said it resembles a "Pint", but I am based near the building and have never, not even once, heard it be referred to as that. It is known almost universally as "the Walkie-Talkie" in both common usage and the press. --TBM10 (talk) 12:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So we should ignore the cited newspaper article in favour of your opinion? 85.159.85.2 (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not my opinion, it's fact. There are a hundred other citations we could use which universally and exclusively refer to it as the Walkie-Talkie. --TBM10 (talk) 12:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone is calling it "The Pint", and the FT article does, then it is not "universally and exclusively" known as the walkie talkie so that is not a fact, it is an opinion. 85.159.85.2 (talk) 12:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname

message: There have been reports of the building reflecting and focusing sunlight onto cars and other things so intensely that they melt http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-23930675 and http://news.uk.msn.com/trending-blog/skyscraper-walkie-talkie-heat-ray-strikes-again/
I'm not familiar with the rules and conventions of editing wikipedia articles, would someone who is be willing to update the article to include mention of this?
213.107.64.120 (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been already. --TBM10 (talk) 12:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sun Reflection 

message: Outside of architectural circles, this tower only made international news under "Fryscraper" so this is not "undue", it is what it is notable for internationally (ie. outside of UK). Therefore "Fryscraper" should exist (be mentioned) in this article.  -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 02:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say appropriate to mention in the section on sun reflection along with "walkie scorchie", but not in the lead. Only time will tell which name stick and are used by the public at large.--User:Salix alba (talk): 08:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Salix. --TBM10 (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, definitely not the lede. A simple sentence in the appropriate section will do. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 21:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. If the name "Fryscraper" is popularly appearing in the press it makes sense to mention it, which is done in the Criticisms section. Depending on the outcome of the complaints, etc., it may become relevant to add an indication of the problems to the lede, but I think the situation needs to play out further before adding too many more nicknames for the tower to the lede. -- Metheglyn (talk) 04:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC: Fryscraper

message: I think I'm missing something, is this sentence correct?  "Despite the top-down method of construction, the old building was not demolished from the bottom-up, as a temporary structure was built, allowing Keltbray, the demolition contractor, to demolish the building from the top down." GreaseballNYC (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  wordy 

message: Main picture needs updating to a newer photograph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.11.159 (talk) 22:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Picture 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 20 Fenchurch Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070717141235/http://www.20fenchurchstreet.co.uk/ to http://www.20fenchurchstreet.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:The Sky Garden.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 20, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-05-20. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:The Sky Garden.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The article says the building has 34 storeys, and the Sky Garden occupies the top three. The picture caption says the Sky Garden occupies 4 storeys, going up to the 37th. DuncanHill (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And the Sky Garden website says the building has 38 storeys. DuncanHill (talk) 11:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sky garden and storeys - article and picture caption are contradictory 

message: The lead claims it's the sixth tallest building in the City, the website says fifth. Website says 38 storeys, article variously either 34 or 37. DuncanHill (talk) 11:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sixth tallest? How many storeys?