Talk:Tuvia Grossman

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: :Image:Grossmanattack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Grossmanattack.jpg

message: I agree with the original poster, the photographer had to be aware of what was going on, wrote the erroneous caption and had some hand in the misrepresentation!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.205.143 (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did anyone find out who took the photo? 

message: Gideon Tzefadi is the Israeli-Hebrew translation of his name. The Druze have Arabic names. It must be Jidun as-Safadi. Not the same, as Ibrahim isn't quite the same as Abraham/Abram/Avrum, now is it? Shameful.
In my view (or is it: in any thinking person's?), the story is supposed to be about a) anti-Israeli bias reflected in a wrong caption, and b) the non-Jew saving a Jew. Am I wrong? And then making the Wiki article about Tuvia Grossman, the man saved by the officer, is simply wrong. (That's me pretending not to understand where it comes from. This is all run by some hasbara pressure group, the actual human story is just a pretext and gets lost in the process. Grossman is Jewish, so he gets 90% of the coverage.) Not getting the officer's name right is truly shameful. Hebrew has the excuse of not using vowels, but Hebrew-speaking Israelis generally tend to casually change non-Hebrew names to more familiar, Hebrew versions; integrated non-Jewish Israelis are also often using "Hebraised" vesion of their given name in Hebrew-speaking environments (but it doesn't normally apply to surnames). However, none of that is an excuse for somebody researching the story for publication, not in Hebrew and certainly not in English. It's a lack of respect for the non-Jewish officer.
The officer hardly gets an afterthought-like mini-paragraph at the very end. Altogether shameful. Arminden (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We should get his name correct if feasible, but I'm not sure why the article should be about him -- he wasn't misidentified... AnonMoos (talk) 22:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The source has his name as Gidon Tzefadi (not Gideon), so that is what we should have in the article because we can only report what the source says. If an additional source can be found with a Druze spelling, it would be great to add that as well. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The focus should be the Border Police officer, and we don't even have his name