Talk:Bob's Big Boy

message: :Image:Bobs-big-boy-34.4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here  -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD]] Tagging

message: The following was added to the reference section of the page by 75.92.76.52, I'm leaving it here for whatever it's worth:
There appears to be a problem with the dates of the Bob's Big Boy  Incident on La Cienega Blvd. The Shotgun used in the Shooting was Mine. Taken when the Two men Robbed me and Shot me 5 times in the Back in my Auto Repair Shop. They took the Shotgun down from a hidden Location, one keeping out of sight probably because I would recognize him. I disabled the Shotgun so it couldn't be used on me. The Police came to the Hospital and asked me about the Shotgun and said it had been used in a Restaurant on La Cienega Blvd. and left at the Scene. 
That was in the Fall 1978, when I got out of the Hospital the District Attorney's Office showed me Pictures and a Reciept from where I purchased the Gun. They told me the Policemen who came to the Hospital was sent upon their request. I have an 800 Page Story detailing with how a Lawyer had these people doing his dirty work after he settled the Case and told them the Case was no good. An Employee at Bob's Big Boy had a Case with the Lawyer. Whoever contributed to the Story really got their dates mixed badly.
Junkyardsparkle (talk) 04:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving this off of page

message: : There is a Rite Spot at 1500 W. Colorado in Pasadena but Wian worked at the one on 606 E. Colorado in Glendale. See:
* "He (Wian) went to work at his favorite restaurant in Glendale, the Rite Spot." Santa Ana Orange County Register  June 9, 1986.
* Leonard Dunagen was Wian's boss at the Rite Spot. The Los Angeles Times June 9, 1931.
* A help wanted ad: "... Rite Spot  606 E Colorado  Glendale" The Los Angeles Times October 8, 1942.
— βox73 (৳alk) 06:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rite Spot: Glendale or Pasadena? 

message: Thank you for your interest in improving Bob's Big Boy. After seeking feedback, it is clear that "His father's furniture business bankrupt, Wian washed dishes in the school cafeteria to pay for lunch" is fine. The structure of the opening clause is called the nominative absolute. (It's a new term to me too.) Simply adding "went" to the sentence actually creates other grammatical issues. Although unnecessary, working alternatives in that position are "now" and "having gone", and possibly adding "with" at the beginning of the sentence. However, we need to consider a wide audience. Would either of those alternatives make the sentence more readable for you? Let me know what you think. 
Thanks — βox73 (৳alk) 03:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Went" not needed—the nominative absolute 

message: A Big Boy restaurant opened in November in Indian Springs, Nevada with another planned for the Centennial Hills suburb of Las Vegas. These restaurants were originally called Bob's Big Boys, but Bob's was dropped from the name. The Michigan parent is probably disallowing the Bob's name, as cobranding is disallowed generally. Regardless, since this article covers Bob's Big Boy, I think we don't need go further in covering Big Boy Nevada. Coverage belongs in the Big Boy restaurants article. — βox73 (৳alk) 06:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Boy expansion in Nevada  

message: Thank you for your interest in the Bob's Big Boy article. There are many articles that could benefit from the LOC photos. In this case, we have an existing photo of a Big Boy statue. Is the additional photo adding anything to the article or just making it busy? Did you find any other Bob's related photos that could add something lacking instead? — βox73 (৳alk) 01:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A second statue photo?