Talk:Peace journalism

message: Original stub material has been integrated into the relevant section of the full length article such as into the current Introduction, Historical and conceptual roots of peace journalism, or Debates and criticisms section. Paulduffill (talk) 02:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this has some potential, but right now it's more of an essay than an encyclopedic article--DieBuche (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I know this comment is 9 years on, but I think that Die Buche has hit the nail on the head: the article is more like an extended essay than an encyclopedia article. I'd suggest editing the article down. Stick to the facts. Incidentally, I suspect that the article has been written by students within the field of peace journalism. I don't have a problem with this, but the trap is that one is tempted to write a dissertation on the importance of peace journalism. This is why there have been some NPOV concerns. Edit the darn thing down! Don't give us a dissertation. Research17 (talk) 09:51, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: July 1 2010: Page expanded from a stub into full length article

message: "Peace journalism has aroused a number of debates and criticisms from scholars and journalists.  Should the substance of a criticism not be addressed in the present article, please add it to this section so that it may be noted and if appropriate responded to."  
And make your comments on the talk page (here)  --Greenmaven (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved text from article page to talk page - re section 'Debates and criticisms' 

message: External links added in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines: Wikipedia:EL. The links that have been added into the entry are:
-accurate meritable and directly relevant to the article: peace journalism is an international practice and links and resources need to reflect that.
-organisations links are formatted (according to region) for ease reading clarity
-this is information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail
-the entry is not a mere collection of external links or Internet directories and given the long length of the article's body, the links do not dwarf the article's content: Wikipedia:NOT#LINK
-the information is not factually inaccurate information as they are examples of peace journalism and organisations
-links illustrate extent and variety of peace journalism is practiced which is not possible to convey through the body of the article
And make your comments on this talk page (here)  --User:Paulduffill (talk) 03:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added external links "resources" and "organisations" in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines 

message: This reads like it is advocating for its subject. While it is a good idea to discuss the historical reasons that a subject has arisen, it is not Wikipedia's role to pass judgement on those reasons. Or to put it another way, it is okay to discuss causes, but not to move from there to arguing for the necessity of peace journalism, or any other subject.
In my opinion, this article moves to far along the advocacy spectrum. --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've reformulated the introductory section. Does this get us closer? I would also suggest remaking the image to remove the biased language, or linking the image as an example of movement literature, as described below. JoBaWik (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Rewrite due to NPOV issue 

message: I have notified an editor with a suspected conflict of interest on his Talk Page and do not intend at this point to open up a discussion here in case I am wrong. Thank you.  GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest? 

message: The article had a very long list of external links, titled "Online resources" added back in 2012. Wikipedia has become more careful about such things since then, so I've moved them here. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long list of external links 

message: * World Association for Christian Communication
* Democracy Now - The largest public media collaboration in the U.S.
* Mother Jones - Non-profit investigative journalism.
* Peace Journalism at Park University, Missouri
* Dart Centre for Journalism and Trauma
* Jewish Voice for Peace - The largest US-based grassroots organization dedicated to promoting full equality, democracy and self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians.
* Media Education Foundation - Includes peace journalism content within documentaries and other educational resources to inspire critical reflection on the social, political, and cultural impact of American mass media (free and paid content).
* Peace Media - Large collection of media that promotes peace. Collaborative project with US Institute of Peace and the Conflict Resolution Program at Georgetown University.
* Peace Media: Conflict transformation through mass media - Resources on role of the media in conflict and peace by  Dr. Vladimir Bratic, Assistant Professor of Media and Communications at Hollins University.
* Americans for Peace Now
— Preceding unsigned comment added by StarryGrandma (talk • contribs) 19:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: North America

message: :File:Peace Journalism table.jpg, which is a jpg of a text table, should be converted to text for the use of those who use screen readers. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not just for those who use screen readers, but unless the table is notable as a particularly historical important item of the history of peace journalism, it makes no sense to include it at all in frozen form. The image contains text, and if the text is meaningful in itself, then it should be editable be Wikipedians, in order to form a valid summary of the most notable available knowledge on this topic. Boud (talk) 01:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility issue: convert jpg table of comparisons into text