lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:High-energy nuclear physics

message: I've suggested merging Relativistic nuclear collisions in to the High energy nuclear physics article.  Presently both articles are short and cover much the same material.  Djr32 (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, but I am less taken with treating all heavy-ion collisions under this heading.  Heavy-ion reactions just above the Coulomb barrier, at energies far below those where the effects described in this article come into play, are also significant research topics (for instance, as ways to make superheavy elements), and should be treated in an article of their own.  At the moment, "heavy-ion collisions" is simply a redirect to here.  The topic deserves better, and needs to get written up in a way that doesn't collide with this article, in a manner of speaking. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 22:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Peppino Garibaldi

message: Note this person was not GG I's son, he was his grandson. GG the Elder had four sons with Anita - Minotti (born 1840), Rosita (born 1843), Teresita (born 1845), and Ricciotti (born 1847). The subject of this article was born many years after she died! --SandyDancer 01:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Giant Forest

message: Not independently notable MB 02:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:The House (Sequoia grove)]] into [[:Giant Forest]]  

message: This argument I see. The three are cross-linked, and putting them into the Giant Forest article makes some sense, but would it make the already long Giant Forest article a bit messy?
Does this article need more detail?
dino (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: This argument I see

message: Not independently notable MB 02:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:The Senate (Sequoia grove)]] into [[:Giant Forest]]  

message: This argument I see. The three are cross-linked, and putting them into the Giant Forest article makes some sense, but would it make the already long Giant Forest article a bit messy?
Does this article need more detail?
dino (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: This argument I see

message: Not independently notable MB 02:56, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:Congress Group (Sequoia grove)]] into [[:Giant Forest]]  

message: This argument I see. The three are cross-linked, and putting them into the Giant Forest article makes some sense, but would it make the already long Giant Forest article a bit messy?
Does this article need more detail?
dino (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: This argument I see
Talk:William Preston Few

message: Hi, LaszloWalrus, please go to Duke's Presidents.  You will see that Duke itself refers to Brodhead as its ninth president.  Counting back, that makes Few the first (which should be obvious anyway).  I think we should stick with the university's own method of numbering its presidents, rather than inventing a new and more confusing method.  Cheers, Eleuther 01:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Counting presidents

message: Hi, 152.3.81.219, I reverted your change because you are misreading the source.  It states that Kilgo, the previous president, was made a bishop.  When Kilgo resigned the presidency to take up his new job as bishop, Few became the next president.  Few himself was not a bishop, or even (as far as I can find) a cleric.  Also, when you created the Notes section, you deleted my References section, I assume by accident, so I'm reverting that too.  (The source you used is already linked to by the one I cited, so I don't think there's a need to add it separately.) Eleuther 06:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Misread it apparently.  Sorry! Good catch! -152.3.81.219 05:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced bishopric
Talk:Polypedates maculatus

message: Shouldn't the title of the page be the common name rather than the scientific one? And who the wrote the description?68.166.65.233 (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

message: Nothing 103.167.229.226 (talk) 04:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantage and disadvantage
Talk:Skirmish of Sporting Hill

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to Battle of Sporting Hill?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  06:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I wouldn't call it a battle. Come on, 20 people dead? With all due respect for the victims, more people die on an average county fair. //Halibutt 13:22, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: According to a book written by Robert Christ, "The History of Camp Hill, Pennsylvania", this skirmish actually took place in Hampden Township, East Pennsboro Township, and Camp Hill Borough. There is a current State Historic Marker at the intersection of 31st and Market Streets in Camp Hill, designated that location the furthest point northeast that the Confederate Army reached during the American Civil War. This location is 3 miles from the Susquehanna River. Updating page to note this.  Wrightchr | talk  17:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: I have no special knowledge of this topic, but the date, 6/30/1863, in the info box and first paragraph is different from the date in the Skirmish section, 6/29/1863. There may have been actions of both dates, but the details are only about the 29th. Qrobert (talk) 18:19, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistent Date

message: Is this the same as, or does it include the Skirmish of Oyster Point? Penndyl (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skirmish of Oyster Point
Talk:Hypernucleus

message: Hello, exotic nuclei redirects here but I think it is not really correct. Indeed, exotic nuclei defines nuclei that does not exist naturally on Earth. It is the case of hypernuclei but it is not limited to them. There are also "classic" nuclei which are neutron-rich or neutron-deficient. So probably this redirection should be deleted because it is mentioned in the article and so the reader could think that both terms are synonyms. There exists a stub article on French Wikipedia. Pamputt (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exotic nuclei 

message: "stable apart from eventual weak decay" sounds like years - what is the half life ? 10^-10 sec ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the correct order of magnitude. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eventual 

message: What is a di-atomic element? 41.113.197.63 (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural sciences 

message: I'm working on this article big-time, and have determined the first new image that will be needed: a Feynman diagram, at the hadronic level, illustrating a paragraph on the lambda–nucleon interaction. It would be similar to Fig. 14 in Gal et al. (2016) cited in the article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram(s) requested
Talk:Hyperpolarization (physics)

message: The article says “The angular momentum is transferred from the alkali metal electrons to the noble gas nuclei through collisions.” Can this be true? The electrons of the alkali metal collide with the noble gas nuclei? Appears very strange to me.--141.3.200.233 (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is true, but the article does not explain that the alkali metal, e.g. Rb, is in the vapor phase. See  Tachyon (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-exchange 

message: The following 'explanation' is suitable only for post-grads, and the grammar of that introductory clause is appropriate only to children. The whole thing is a pedagogical nightmare and needs to be cleaned up so that it can be understood more easily. JohndanR (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "To explain...easier,"
Talk:New Hope Railroad

message: Copied from User talk:Jameslwoodward#New Hope and Ivyland Railroad:
:Re this page, NHRR seems to be the marking for the New Haven Railroad, not the New Hope and Ivyland Railroad. Please search the web using both NHRR and NHIR. I believe both this page and List of Pennsylvania railroads need to be changed. What do you think? Bento00 (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The New Haven is long gone.  Although I'm not jumping up and down positive, I believe that the web site that I referenced in the article is definitive -- it certainly has that feel.  I also found another site, run by an enthusiast, that says the same thing. Finally, the NRHS has a site that shows the dates -- it was NHIR, but is now NHRR.  The New Haven was NH from 1938 to 1966. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs)  21:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

text: There isn't any conflict with the New Haven, no. The new hope & ivyland registered the reporting mark soon after the new haven's demise, and as far as I know the new haven mainly used the "NH" reporting mark anyways. But there appears to be another problem. NHRR seems to be an older reporting mark found on the likes of the baggage car abandoned in wycombe, whereas NHIR is the current mark as seen on their ballast car. Should I go grab a source and change this? Trainmastercrc (talk) 01:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about Reporting Mark

message: i went to the museum at the naval air force development center at 780 falcon circle in warminster the tracks of this railroad run right behind that building which houses the worlds largest human centrifuge they told us there those rail lines were used to bring the motor in for it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.98.227.191 (talk) 23:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centrifuge Museum 

message: So which is it....New Hope or New Hope and Ivyland?  Has the name been officially changed?  Elsquared (talk) 01:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivyland? 

message: In light of what happened the last time I did this without first having a discussion on the talk page, I will attempt to reach a consensus on the talk page here first. The bottom line is: the giant tables of rolling stock have ZERO citations to anything, and constitute original research in their current form, and arguably undue weight as well. Are there citations available for this information? If none exist, it will need to be removed per Wikipedia's policies. And regardless, the giant notes sections should be trimmed down, and the entries which are identical except for different road numbers should be consolidated. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling stock tables
Talk:Clubhouse

message: Hello my name is Lance Beglin and I am one of the co-creators of this page. The Club House is a fictional business that my partner, Adam Bradford, and I created for an End-User Computing class at Eastern Michigan University. One of the requirements for this project is to create a wiki for our business on wikipedia.org. We will then present it to the class on 12/12/06.  We only ask that this page remain until 12/13/06, after this date the page may be deleted as the Admins see fit. If you have any questions or have decided whether or not to delete this page please e-mail me at (email adress removed).—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lbeglin (talk • contribs) 02:18, 4 December 2006  (UTC)
:Please review WP:NOT, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a webhost for fictional companies. And do not overwrite a valid disambiguation page. Kusma (討論) 09:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've reverted this but maybe an article on clubhouse is needed? In ictu oculi (talk) 22:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article written into dab lead
Talk:Inertial wave

message: What is the orientation of the AXIS OF ROTATION (at image left) in the graphic (Inertial Mode in a Sphere)?
I don't know if it is vertical, i.e., N at top / S at bottom... or if the axis runs into/out of the page (would appear as a dot in the image).  I believe the former is true, but I'm not sure.  Could somebody answer this and update the caption under the graphic with this new info, please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.248.6 (talk) 12:55, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the orientation of the AXIS OF ROTATION (at image left) in the graphic (Inertial Mode in a Sphere)?
Talk:Albert P. Clark

message: This article currently has just one stated source, the official U.S. military bio for Albert P. Clark. I see at least problems: 1.) the official U.S. military bios are slanted, in that they do not convey information that would reflect poorly on the military (compare the official bio of Frank Kelso, involved in the Tailhook scandal, vs. a better written wikipedia article on him using several other sources), and 2.) the article does not show which material is copied. Copied material should be in quotes (quotation marks or set in block quote formatting), to separate from wikipedia editor wording.  See [[WP:REF}] Hence I mark this article with the "refimprove" and related tags. doncram (talk) 03:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ref improvements needed

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esaba (talk • contribs) 22:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Isaac Lichtenstein

message: Given how this went—only 10-9 in favor of deletion—I'm surprised this was interpreted as consensus to delete. I remain skeptical on the article, but since many of the objections were about poor sourcing, I hope this will be understoodd as a deletion without prejudice against future creation of a better-cited article. If anyone wants to see the deleted article as a possible aid to creating a more appropriate article on the subject, let me know and I will let you have a copy (as an administrator, I can access the deleted article). - Jmabel | Talk 02:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I offered it as an alternative to deletion. Unfortunately I don't think that suggestion was taken into consideration when it was deleted by a simple majority vote. Messianic Judaism editors would ask that extra consideration be given to them since they are a helpless minority in the face of such raw democratic muscle - and would ask that a decision about consensus would include the options Messianic editors promote. Granted the articles could be improved or changed to a different presentation of information, however the articles themselves in my opinion, were prematurely deleted. inigmatus 05:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surpised too. I offered  [[WP:N]]
Talk:Interference (communication)

message: I propose that Interference in mobile communications be merged into Interference (communication). I think that the content in the Interference in mobile communications article can easily be explained in the context of Interference (communication), and the Interference (communication) article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Interference in mobile communications will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. JanetteDoe (talk) 04:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Interference filter

message: Changed the formula on the page to its full form including a sin(theta) as the small angle approximation made for angles <20 degrees before wasn't valid. Oct 23, 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.107.87 (talk) 12:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Small Angles

message: Are there any non-thin film interference filters?  If not, it seems like these should be merged into or as a section of Thin-film interference. Dspark76 (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The name "interference filter" is the technical name of a specific scientific apparatus that happens to use interference to accomplish filtering. The term shows up in articles published in scientific journals of all sorts, describing some experimental setup. A "stealth fighter aircraft" is also uses thin-film interference (at radar wavelengths) to provide stealth capability, but you would not propose merging that article into thin-film, would you? I'd recommend no merge. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Might make sense to merge into dichroic filter, though, although dichroic filter seems to cover broader uses than optical benches. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Alpharetta, Georgia

message: Fulton Science Academy has incorrect information in the Middle School section as “a private school in Roswell for students in 6th to 8th grade” but it is a K-12 school in Alpharetta. Here is their website:
https://fultonscienceacademy.org/about-us-3/
Perhaps it is getting mistaken for Fulton Academy for Science and Technology in Roswell? 
It is also has an outdated reference in the High School section. 73.110.181.73 (talk) 11:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Fulton Science Academy Information
Talk:Intramolecular reaction

message: Should this article page be moved to Intramolecular force as the Intermolecular force article has been? "Intramolecular" (by itself) is not really the proper grammatical tense for an article name of a topic or subject that is not a proper name itself (such as movie title or registered trademark). Nagelfar (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right that this is not a proper title because intramolecular is an adjective, and article topics are generally nouns. However, the actual contents of this article are not about intramolecular forces, but about intramolecular reactions. --17:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to 'Intramolecular force'? 
Talk:Ata Demirer

message: You can see in this YouTube video , originally broadcasted on Kanal D, where he says "Annem Ahıskalı" (i.e. Meskhetian Turk). Sseevv (talk) 18:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI He has Ahiska roots
Talk:ISIS Neutron and Muon Source

message: As is admitted in the very first line of the article ISIS is a neutron AND muon source, so should the title of the article not be "ISIS neutron and muon source" with a redirect from this page to that one Richtea2007 (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion of muons in title
Talk:Saung

message: I like the way of information proved by the website but still missing from a lot of points we hope we can have more information about it 41.233.24.104 (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding the information to be correct 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Saung-Gauk.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 18, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-03-18. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Tightwad Hill

message: A Unique System of Anarchy? Come on! Is it truly unique and not replicated anywhere in the country? If the entire system revolves around moderating the color of clothes is it really worthy of the title of an system. It seems similar to every forth of July when people gather on hills to watch fireworks. If a serious issue arose the police would not be called? If so, it is hardly anarchy. Perhaps some citation would convince me.
75.28.160.10 02:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Anarchy?!''' 

message: There is no song on the insomniac album called tightwad hill or even relating to a drug dealer! Who is responsible for moderating this page?
:You are! Sheep81 04:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Green Day?!''' 

message: To my observation the cannon does not actually shoot projectiles. The "small pieces of cardboard" evidently shattered bits of masking tape that is used to strap the sound charge onto the muzzle of the cannon. 
Cardboard may only be a component of the actual charge, and it is this distinction that I feel warrants the revision of that particular passage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.78.115.10 (talk) 07:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannon Shoots? 

message: Please stop removing this link as it is the official Facebook page for Tightwad Hill.
Thank you.
- Tad, Gov. of Tightwad Hill  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.129.161.251 (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Tightwad Hill Facebook page linked added by Tad, Governor of Tightwad Hill
Talk:.mm

message: It would be best not to merge the .bu and .mm articles, since there are articles on all the top level domains, including current ones, discontinued ones, and proposed future ones.  It would be consistent to keep that one. *Dan T.* 03:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: I highly disagree to the proposal for the merge, they are totally different domains. andrewrox424 Bleep 09:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: .bu never existed 24.91.16.229 18:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Isothermal flow

message: What the hell does this mean?
:"The interesting part of this flow is that the flow is choked at 1/\sqrt{k} and not at Mach number equal to one as in the case of many other model such as Fanno flow."
"The flow is choked at" means... what and why? Is k Boltzmann's constant, if so where does this number come from, if not then what is it? Why not the Mach number = 1? If there are "many other model and not models, what else is there apart from the Fanno flow? It even seems to get the terminology "flow" and model mixed up... Maschen (talk) 12:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ???
Talk:Isotone

message: The nuclide "Sm-149" is unstable, so the number 87 should be in the 數列!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.126.202.81 (talk) 14:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is *predicted* to be unstable, but according to the Stable isotope article, Sm-149 decay has never actually been observed. -- Limulus (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some sources will tell you it has been observed, some will tell you it has not. To date I have not found a primary-source report of its radioactivity, so I think we should leave it listed as a stable isotope that is predicted to be radioactive (like all Sm, Eu, and Ho and above isotopes). Double sharp (talk) 01:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost number "87" 

message: The graph having the caption "Nuclide half-lives colorcoded" could hardly be worse: Neither the horizontal nor the vertical axis is labeled, nor are they described in the caption. So nobody has any idea what the graph is purporting to show. 
(And, the term "color-coded" is misspelled.)216.161.117.162 (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathetically bad graph
Talk:Without Feathers

message: What is the basis for assuming that the title is a reference to Emily Dickinson? I would think it could equally easily be an allusion to Aristotle's description of man as a "featherless biped". - Jmabel | Talk 02:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Allusion in title
Talk:Ispahani Islamia Eye Institute and Hospital

message: "Ispahani Islamia Eye Institue and Hospital" --64.134.64.190 (talk) 14:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! /wiae ★ /tlk 14:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title has misspelled word

message: Added correct infobox for hospitals
-- Talk to G Moore 22:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Kelvin–Voigt material

message: Should really be Kelvin–Voigt (with en-dash) rather than Kelvin-Voigt (with hyphen).
Yes:  this is a problem for most WP articles — but then, who cares for correctness?
—DIV (128.250.204.118 05:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name : En-dash is correct 

message: This article is on the kelvin-voigt model.  This isn't a material, it's a simplified model which was developed to try to represent the behavior exibited by some materials.  The article needs to be corrected to fix this misconception. -- Mecanismo | Talk 19:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a material