lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology

message: I rewrote the history section since it included a large chunk of copyrighted material copypasted from this book. --Muhandes (talk) 08:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright material 

message: I removed the list of programmes per WP:UNIGUIDE that says very clearly "do not attempt to list every major, degree, or program offered in this or any section". Please don't reintroduce it. --Muhandes (talk) 08:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programmes 

message: The academics could be improved to explain the structure better. Needs further breakdown and description. Also, more images in the Activities section will be really nice. Renzut  —Preceding undated comment added 20:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Academics needs improvement
Talk:Godavari-class frigate

message: Is the home port for the P-16 ships back to Mumbai? As the combat group set to receive Vikramaditya was composed of Western Fleet vessels. If it is then P-16A (Brahmaputra) class ships would be back with Eastern Fleet as well. Can someone confirm this change prior to editing the entry.Versova (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeport
Talk:The New College, Chennai

message: Please discuss in this talk page before making any changes to the article. Wikiality 14:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please discuss

message: As far I know MK Stalin graduated from Presidency and not from New College. Can a proper source provided for the claim? Thanks ώЇЌĩ Ѕαи Яоzε †αLҝ 10:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the  clarification. I really appreciate that. Cheers ώЇЌĩ Ѕαи Яоzε †αLҝ 14:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MK Stalin 

message: Does this school educate people of any gender, or is it limited to men only?  I can't find this information in this article, but the school's website appears to suggest to that it's a school for men only. - Enuja (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender of Students 

message: Hi I would like to get as many as of 76batch graduates to celeberate 40 years from the college.         Krishnan Thiagarajan   Sydney Australia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.81.43 (talk) 06:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am 1976 batch chemistry bsc
Talk:Nilakantha Somayaji

message: I took some out. There is more . The entire "astronomy" section ought to go, unless someone speaks for it William M. Connolley (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jagged-ese 

message: Kelallur Neelakandhan Somayaji appears to be about the same person, but with different birth and death dates. 50.79.5.81 (talk) 19:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: If you read the original sources, you find that most of the astronomy calculations are just the interpretation of modern authors.  If you translate the original text you do not find anything on par with Copernicus, Galileo, or Keplar.  This whole promotion of Nilakantha Somayaji really looks like nationalist/religious propaganda. 180.183.34.200 (talk) 04:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective/Biased Claims
Talk:Nimbarka

message: I've added more information regarding the reasons for this dating and also have given references. (User talk:Madhav kiran sodum) 12:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Research citation

message: The "View of the Shastras" section mentions info about the beliefs of followers and not specifically Nimbarka, and so I am removing it.  The info is here for reference. --Shruti14 t c s 23:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  View of the Shastras 

message: The "Life" section has some minor POV issues. --Shruti14 t c s 23:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: 'In the Nimbarka tradition, there is Nimbarka's Dasa-sloki and its commentary by Giridhar Prapannam published as "The Theology of Nimbarka" by Gita Khurana, Vantage Books, NY. It describes not only that Krishna is superior to Vishnu, but that the two-armed Krishna is superior to the four-armed Krishna form, from a rasa standpoint.' Anyone can verify and complete this ref? Jan 82.208.2.200 (talk) 17:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krishna supremacy ref to verify and complete 

message: Nimbarka as a person needs a separate page distinct from his sect. He is one of the four major Vaishnava philosophers and there has been enough academic research into his life to write about him. All the other Advaitins have a personal page independent of their sect. I can't understand why Nimbarka does not have one. Joshua Jonathan Please clarify. Reo kwon (talk) 03:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there is very little substantive information; the main part is the scholarly dispute about his datings. Rather than having two separate pages, it's more convenient, both for readers and editors, to have just one page. The page you recreated was already missing essential info; imagine discussing and correcting this twice. Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nimbarka as a philosopher needs a separate page
Talk:Nirmal Kumar Ganguly

message: A doctor by education and officating a chair can in know way claim to be notable enough to have a dedicated wikipedia page so please delete this page immediately to keep up with the standards od this wikipedia.The article appears to be created by some sycophant or the subject himself.There are infact more than too many people od this sort who justly have no wikipedia page .This is an example od self advertisement nothing more 117.194.242.73 (talk) 10:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should  be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because non exitant wikidata reference and merely holding a chair as director general or a professorship does not make a person notable enough to have a dedicated page. There are scores od such doctors and not many people in India are aware od his percieved importance or fame.Ichgab (talk) 18:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Guru Tegh Bahadur Nagar

message: the guru liked certain kind of  Hindus more I guess
 and also liked who are known as dwija(who have undergone an upanayana ceremony)- also known as Brahmins the 9th guru -ruled for 10 yrs-ok Windsurfmango16 (talk) 04:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  the guru who also liked certain kind of Hindus more
Talk:North-Eastern Hill University

message: Note:  Project Banner with Meghalaya workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Meghalaya or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 01:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Meghalaya Addition
Talk:HAL HF-24 Marut

message: The only things keeping this one from being directly tagged as a stub are the various tables - as (1) the first indiginous Indian military aircraft and (2) the last of the Kurt Tank (= Focke-Wulf) line, this is a more important subject than your average bear, and deserves some attention from those knowedgable on the subject. - Aerobird 04:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings 

message: The fighter did see action in the Indo-pakistan war of 1971. The details should be mentioned.
I do remember this page being bigger, or maybe theres another, bigger Marut page on wikipedia...This page can defnitely be expanded by leaps and bounds.. theres a lot more information available than is shown here. 155.69.5.236 07:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: War history 

message: In Performance section rate of climb should be 22.5 ms or 4,444 ft/min
Why? because it is Accurate performance data obtained from IAF evaluation, that can be check all over internet or in any book !
Also if someone calculate "Time to altitude": 9 min 20 s to 12,000 m (40,000 ft) to m/s or ft/min it will get the same results !
Max climb rate - 22.5 ms (4,444ft/min)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TRUTH, JUSTICE & RIGHT WAY (talk • contribs) 05:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) You don't get the same results - 12000/560 = 21.4 m/s. not 22.5. 2) You cannot convert Time to altitude to an climb rate by simple division, as the climb rate is the maximum, instantaneous figure (normally at sea level) - this maximum would be expected to be much higher then the average value given by a time to altitude. 3) If the values you quote are "all over the internet" or "in any book", where are they? The only source that you quoted, militaryfactory.com is not a reliable source - while Jane's All the World's Aircraft is a high quality reliable source (who would have got their information from HAL or the Indian government). Please provide sources or revert.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  HF-24 MARUT Rate of Climb 22.5 m/s or 4,444 ft/min
Talk:P.E.S. College of Engineering

message: This article was tagged for copypasting concerns on 27 November 2010 and listed at the copyright problems board automatically for evaluation. I have confirmed that content added in May 2006 was previously published at this page. Is licensing permission for this content verified? I don't see a release on the page. I'm blanking the content until we can confirm. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: I created a temp article at the subpage. -- Nayvik (talk) 04:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temp article at subpage 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Punjab Agricultural University

message: I propose that the article Bioinformatics Centre (Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana) be merged into this article with a redirect. That is the usual practice for individual departments or centres at a particular school, unless the department or centre is UNUSUALLY notable. If no one objects, I will carry out the merge/redirect in a week. --MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged and redirected it today. --MelanieN (talk) 14:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Punjabi University

message: Yadavindra College of Engineering, Talwandi Sabo (a regional campus of Punjabi University, Patiala) was a separate page on wikipedia, but it was redirected to Punjabi University by an editor. I request to split Punjabi University and Yadavindra College of Engineering into two different pages. As per Wikipedia's [] branching guidelines, which clearly says that the sub-organization should be notable enough as per guidelines. I think this sub-organization/article is good enough for notability guidelines. So, I am proposing to revert this redirect. Quality Check  (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not about the article being "good" or not, but about being notable. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

text: The branch itself is notable, being a full fledged engineering college. Similar articles already exist on wikipedia (UIET, UICET, UIAMS and PUSSGRC) of Panjab University, Chandigarh. Also, whosoever has marked it as redirect, not even bothered to add/merge the existing page content into main article. Kindly revert this redirect, as this separate article is definitely a positive addition to Wikipedia.Quality Check  (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split

message: List of Sanskrit universities in India - Wikipedia lists universities with Sanskrit language in name starting with Year 1791. 63.88.87.68 (talk) 16:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute claim of only 2nd university named after language
Talk:Raj Chandra Bose

message: Raj has earned the Noble Prize in 1936 and became the best Indian American Mathematician. He was non for making the codes of Geometry with Latin Squares.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:AC32:A600:FD55:84D5:1BC:DBBB (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math Award 

message: According to MacTutor he was born in Hoshangabad and not Calcutta.--Claude J (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth
Talk:Rajagopala Chidambaram

message: Can you please provide the list of Priincipal Scientific Advisors to the Government of India from 1st Five Year Plan which will be very useful to school students???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.248.17.150 (talk) 09:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you please provide the list of Priincipal Scientific Advisors to the Government of India from 1st Five Year Plan which will be very useful to school students 
Talk:Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: Many different sources says it has but many other says  it doesn't have..
I think it is bit confusing between neet UG or neet pg. SayPyaR (talk) 01:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does It has rural service bond?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Australia task force/A-League player project

message: I'm looking to get this player project kicked back into action as A-League V3 approaches and the number of HAL players will increase from new signings.  In doing this, there's a few actions and process matters I'm opening for discussion: 
Reassess - While the summary page has been quiet, I'm sure there has been work on articles below the surface thats not updated in the list and totals by the editors (myself included).  A reassessment of each listed article to confirm its class would help provide a complete picture of the project, and also probably tidy some vandalism. 
Format - Is there a more helpful way of listing players, maybe in a single table? (ie by club, alphabetical, etc)  Should certain players articles be identified as priority for improvement (ie captains, marquees, internationals)?  Any ideas for how to display. 
Accuracy - is the list complete?  Its also a bit unclear what totals update automatically and what needs to be added/changed manually. 
I'm still new to these processes so also looking for guidance as well as generating some activity. - Tomperc 03:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-activate

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Talk:Ravenshaw College

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:RIMT University

message: I was looking for an article about reflectometric impulse measurement technique, with the acronym RIMT, which came here.  There is no article on it yet, but it is similar to Time-domain reflectometry, so I thought I would redirect until an article is written.  But it seems that RIMT goes here.  Gah4 (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a hatnotes to the article, please see that it makes sense. --Muhandes (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it too strange to do  and use the redirect?  (That is the capitalization for the current redirect.) Gah4 (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   The first rule of Wikipedia:Hatnote is . It's not a big deal, if you feel that this merits an exception, go for it. --Muhandes (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that you are right, but what is really needed is its own article. The nice thing about redirects is that they are hints to writing an article. Gah4 (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  reflectometric impulse measurement technique
Talk:King of the Monsters (video game)

message: I've composed a major rewrite of this article (including removing the "Vaxus" nonsense added by an anonymous user) and cleaned it up a bit. However, I'm really still not satisfied with it. It still seems far too cluttered and messy, and I'm not too fond of this article covering both games. However, I don't think I can do enough to justify splitting them into separate articles, though. Could someone possibly help out (it really needs some screenshots) or at least make some suggestions about what else to do? -Jacquismo 03:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Much more work needed!

message: Since I own both games, Im working on the stats for the monsters and I can get screen shots...Is that good? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperSaiyan4Godzilla (talk • contribs) 00:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  King of the Monsters Page(s) 

message: I was watching the intro to the Angry Video Game Nerd's festers quest video, and i saw him take King of the monsters 2 out of the case, put it on a scale, and find out that it weighed 50 lbs. Is it just this game, or all cartrages? 12.226.11.161 (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can pretty much guarantee you that the KotM2 cartridge does not weigh anywhere near 50 pounds. —Lowellian (reply) 03:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: weight of the cartrage

message: This article is very poorly written end developed and only cites one source! There is a ton of information that could be added to the article including the game's development and reception (for some reason there are some reviews in the gameplay section), the section on the game's gameplay should be rewritten as it is poorly developed and written, also more sources should be added to the article as well as an infobox.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite and Expansion
Talk:Sacchidananda Shivabhinava Narasimha Bharati

message: "He was the famous Acharya who rediscovered Kalady,Kerala, India, the birthplace of Adi Sankaracharya. He was such a divine personage who infused universal love in the minds of all. His activities were many sided. His knowledge was omniscient. His devotion was intense. His sympathy was universal and purely contagious. No man was ushered into His holy presence who did not go back full of noble resolve to lead thenceforward a purer and a more exalted life. To hear of Him was a pleasure. To see Him was a privilege. To speak to Him was a real blessing and to be granted a special interview - Ah! That was the acme of happiness, which people coveted most in all earnestness. The magnetic force of His wonderful personality was such that one word, nay one smile or even one look was quite enough to convert even the most indifferent of persons into his most ardent and obedient of disciples."
This is such POV that I am going to delete it and include it here in the talk page
Cheers V. Joe (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Tag
Talk:Sanskar International School

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Sanskriti School

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 08:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Since almost everyone in the school hates the current principle lets form a petition to change the principle Lamborginic (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting rid of the current Principle
Talk:Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan

message: sarv siksha abhiyaan
www.mhrd.com
primary education  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.120.94 (talk) 08:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ssa 

message: The article appeared to be a copy-paste from http://rama-techcomputerscience.blogspot.com/2011/04/ssa.html. However, the content there may well have been copied from the pre-dating Wikipedia version of 21 March 2011. Having said that the text in that Wikipedia version is clearly pasted in from various versions of the SSA Frameworks. Example of the latest one here. Thus it is still a copyright violation. I am reducing the article to a stub. If anyone wants to to re-build it, please do so in your own words and fully mark and attribute any quoted material (should be no more than two or three sentences in all). Voceditenore (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex copyright situation 

message: A major initiative such as SSA deserves better. I'll try to re-build the article over the next one month. Amuk (talk) 11:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescue attempt 

message: Sarva Alan joshy vellara (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarva shiksha abiyan 

message: Maths is a very beautiful subject 106.76.15.48 (talk) 16:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maths