Talk:Jakarta Messaging

message: What is a "MOM"? The acronym is used in the article but never defined.
Tpellman 21:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Message Oriented Middleware.  It was implied in the opening paragraph, but it wasn't explicit.  I've just fixed that. RossPatterson 22:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

message: removed section per Wikipedia is not a directory. Wikipedia is not a repository for lists,  directories or Advocacy of commercial products and/or websites. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias, this applies not only to article text, but to companies, company lists, products, external links, or any other material as well.--Hu12 18:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Software Providers

message: What does "This was first used by Eraine Bernadette O. Tayum and Edwin Tayum of FEP" (in the "Elements" section) even mean? Is it just random spam, or is it an attempt to convey actual information? Ultomten (talk) 14:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam

message: Changed 
As the name queue suggests, the messages are delivered in the order sent. A message is removed from the queue once it has been read.
to
A staging area that contains messages that have been sent and are waiting to be read. Note that, contrary to what the name queue suggests, messages don't have to be delivered in the order sent. If the message driven bean pool contains more than one instance then messages can be processed concurrently and thus it is possible that a later message is processed sooner than an earlier one. A JMS queue guarantees only that each message is processed only once.
--Fraktalek (talk) 10:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: JMS queue

message: Hmm, I have a bit of a problem with comparing the publish/subscribe model to an anonymous billboard. Surely a billboard is a system whereby consumers can come along at any point to read the messages on it, but the p/s model in JMS requires the recipients to be connected at the time. Surely it's more like some sort of public address system. What do people think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.80.88 (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous billboard analogy

message: I believe RabbitMQ is incorrectly listed as a JMS provider. Rabbit is a message queue and they have a Java client but they do not implement the JMS API. Also it looks as though StormMQ is also incorrectly listed as a JMS provider.151.190.254.108 (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RabbitMQ

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Java Message Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120106182929/http://www.softwareag.com/corporate/products/wm/application_integration/broker/overview/default.asp to http://www.softwareag.com/corporate/products/wm/application_integration/broker/overview/default.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified