lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crispin Salvador

message: I've gone through this article to link nearly every noun and adjective to a Wikipedia article, if it exists and is at least peripherally related. If you find one I missed, link it. Peripherally-related articles that do not contribute materially to the subject matter are NOT normally linked, but in this case they contribute materially to the feeling that Crispin Salvador is a real person, despite the article's denying that this is the case. While some may regard this article as a hoax, a fictional character is nevertheless real within the context of the fiction that gives him "life." 
The real-life author does not have an article on Wikipedia (other than this one,) nor does The Philippine Free Press. These do exist at Wikipilipinas: not knowing how to link to a non-Wikipedia wiki, I have linked them as references. This is a serious article, folks, not one written just to pump sales of an as-yet-unpublished book (that has won an award despite that), nor to cast doubt on Wikipedia (it already exists, which is why I linked it to "reliability of Wikipedia", nor as a practical joke to have readers ROFLing. Pawyilee (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link mania
Talk:SD Compostela

message: Sociedad Deportiva Compostela was disolved in 2006. A new team, established june 1st, 2004, with the name Sociedad Deportiva Campus Stellae is now using the same name (after buying the defunct team's brands), but it's not the same team/club/instituion by no means. How could they be the same team when both existed and compited in different leagues for two yeras (2004-05 and 2005-06) ?. They should have different articles.--Banderas (talk) 08:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different teams with the same commercial name
Talk:Technological Institute of the Philippines

message: Most of the History section and all of the Vision and Mission section added by Charles allied18 is a verbatim copy of the TIP's website (here  and here  respectively) and thus is a copyright violation. I have removed it as per WP:Copyright. Danelo 18:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted content removed
Talk:Moruya Airport

message: I have reverted to my previous edit that was done by a known sockpuppet to a banned user. PLEASE do not add information unless you have a source.... for example you CANNOT operate a 747 into YMRY because it only has a 1500m runway, that is code C rated and only 30m wide. A B747 REQUIRES at least 2000m of runway at code D and 45m wide. The only SOURCED operator into YMRY is Regional Express using Saab340 type aircraft. I have left their routes on as they are accurate currently, QantasLink doesn't currently fly there.
MEBpilot (talk) 06:20, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:North Point

message: * City Garden
* City Garden Hotel
* Provident Centre
* Newton Hotel
* AIA Tower
* Choi Sai Woo Park (on Braemar Hill)
* Chun Yeung Street Market
* Kiu Kwan Mansion
* Sunbeam Theatre
* Harbour Plaza North Point
* Hong Kong Funeral Home
* North Point Ferry Pier
This was a section in the article itself, but I've deleted it since a mere listing of these places is of little value to the readers.  But if or when we can come up with actual content to explain the significance of these places, we should put them back in.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Places in North Point
Talk:Supercopa de España

message: The records are collated, the only thing that changed was the name, sort of like the Charity Shield and Community Shield in England. (Fadiga09 (talk) 21:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Records collated

message: What does "Automatisch won" mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.28.228.115 (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatisch won? 

message: I think the table format should be changed. These are my suggestions.
With venues.
Year       	Champion                	Scores   	Runner-up                         	Venues                           	Refs
2011Details	Barcelona(Liga champion)	2–2	Real Madrid(Copa del Rey champion)	Santiago Bernabéu Stadium, Madrid	
2011Details	Barcelona(Liga champion)	3–2	Real Madrid(Copa del Rey champion)	Camp Nou, Barcelona              	
and without the venues.
Year       	Champion                               	Scores   	Runner-up                              	Notes
2009Details	Barcelona(Liga & Copa del Rey champion)	2–1	Athletic Bilbao(Copa del Rey runner-up)	Athletic Bilbao played as the Copa del Rey runner-up
2009Details	Barcelona(Liga & Copa del Rey champion)	3–0	Athletic Bilbao(Copa del Rey runner-up)	Athletic Bilbao played as the Copa del Rey runner-up
Comments and suggestions. --MicroX (talk) 07:43, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change list of champions table format 

message: On spanish wikipedia there is a top 5 scorers if someone knows how to create a table. There is also references from BD Futbol. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.101.42 (talk) 19:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  All-Time Top Scorer
Talk:Liga F

message: Is there any opposition to renaming the article Liga Femenina per the La Liga website? 1, 2 Hmlarson (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to rename article

message: Really think these timelines would be better in the team's articles. -Koppapa (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: season to season

message: Is the league still known as finetwork Liga F? The logo on the official site no longer includes finetwork, and they're not listed on the sponsors page either. Simon Brady (talk) 06:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sponsorship in 2023-24
Talk:La Manga Cup

message: In 2010, there was two tournaments played in la manga ! Check the site. This is Wikipedia not a football gazetteer ! Read This Antoinefcb (talk) 20:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Tournaments
Talk:The Oriental Hotel

message: Is this an image of the same hotel ? --Golden Wattle  talk 07:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I tried the link, but was unable to view the image. --StueyD 04:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry - see if this link is better http://image.sl.nsw.gov.au/gpo1/06/d1_06106.jpg --Golden Wattle  talk 22:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that one is better :). As far as I know, this image is of the original hotel, and the current building was opened 5 years later. I will endeavour to find more information on this, and possibly take a photgraph of the building as it stands today. --StueyD 00:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added two photgraphs I took, I think they should suffice. The "blatant advertising" has been removed, my apologies for adding that in the first place, but can we remove the "advert" box from the top. I'll let you decide if the article meets Wikipedia standard, as it was you who added the box. Thanks again. StueyD 23:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:1951 Spanish Grand Prix

message: Gonzalez had 21 points before the race, with a win with fastest lap he could have equaled Fangio's 27 points. Why was he not a title contender? What counted in case of a tie in 1951? According to current rules, he would have been champion with more 3rd places (1-0) if shared places count 1, or with more victories (2-1,5) if shared places count 0,5. 193.6.53.135 (talk) 13:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you are correct and that González was still in title contention, a view which is supported by this source. Unless conclusive evidence that González was not in title contention comes to light, I believe we should update this article and 1951 Italian Grand Prix accordingly. Note that I don't consider sources not mentioning González as a title contender as conclusive evidence that he wasn't; I'd be looking for a definitive statement that he wasn't, or some applicable rule. DH85868993 (talk) 21:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm the anon who posted this question. It looks like there is only one possible way in which Gonzalez was not in title contention, that the driver who scored his points earlier got the better championship position. I also checked the official F1 site and, in earlier seasons, they did not give different ranks to drivers with the same points, not even to Richie Ginther and Graham Hill in 1963, the earliest occasion of two drivers having the same championship points, but different total points. This implies that in 1951, a tie was a tie, and both Fangio and Gonzalez would have been champion. By the way, Fangio had 28 points in total before the race, and Gonzalez could have had 30 after the race. Again, Gonzalez was in title contention in this case. Makaroni96 (talk) 12:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated this article and 1951 Italian Grand Prix. DH85868993 (talk) 11:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gonzalez title chance?
Talk:1974 Spanish Grand Prix

message: To the IP editor who keeps updating this article to show Peterson on pole: www.formula1.com, FORIX and Mike Lang's Grand Prix! Vol 3 all show Lauda on pole for this race, with a qualifying time of 1:18.44 compared to Peterson's time of 1:18.47. If you have a reliable source with different information, then please quote it here. DH85868993 (talk) 13:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pole position
Talk:1976 Spanish Grand Prix

message: I think scenes from this race were included in the movie Bobby Deerfield. Anyone know for sure?  ColinClark (talk) 05:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobby Deerfield 

message: There is a problem with this section of the page. It lists Lauda on 30 and Hunt on 15, but this is not correct as Hunt was disqualified. He was reinstated but that happenned months later. At no point every in 1976 was there a scoreline of 30-15 and it is fictional to suggest otherwise. We should show the points as they were and then later in the season at the appropriate point indicate when the reinstatement occurred and alter the points then. --Falcadore (talk) 23:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This was discussed a couple of years ago, but I'm not sure we actually came to a resolution. It's probably worth reviving the discussion at WP:F1 (I suggest raising it there because the same principle also applies to other races; in particular, most of the 1984 season). DH85868993 (talk) 00:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have, and I found precedent, Schumacher's points in 97. --Falcadore (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Having re-read the discussion, while titled "Standings..." the bulk of the discussion is actually about the race results, not the mini-points tables so it is not that consensus was not reached but the subject was not really debated. The tables however as they stand are entirely fictional and that should not stand. --Falcadore (talk) 00:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points after the race
Talk:1979 Spanish Grand Prix

message: This article has less number of citations kindly provide proper citations and try to improve article according to Wikipedia policies and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it. Thanks.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 15:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do whatever you can to expand the article and provide sources - it would be very helpful, thanks :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations required
Talk:1986 Spanish Grand Prix

message: This article has less number of citations kindly provide proper citations and try to improve article according to Wikipedia policies and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it. Thanks.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 16:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations required
Talk:Thomas Hutchins

message: Due to possible copyvio, I have stubbed the article.  If the text is released under GFDL, then it can be replaced. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 07:26Z
This article states " In 1781, Hutchins was named Geographer of the United States. He is the only person to hold that post.[1]"
Lee Swartz, appears to hold the title currently at the US State Department.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2015/06/01/first-annual-white-house-mapathon.cnn
17:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Isaiah Kacyvenski

message: This seems to have been written by a 10 year-old.
To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a pre-med degree. At most schools, in order to be pre-med, you must take a certain set of classes, however a degree is earned in some other discipline, be it biology, chemistry, english, mechanical engineering, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.247.215.43 (talk) 18:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alcamenes

message: The conclusion of the article seems a bit overskeptical to me, as inv.1358 from the Acropolis Museum in Athens is the original of the group representing Procne and Itys mentioned by Pausanias. Plus, the Leaning Aphrodite is commonly considered as the statue of “Aphrodite in the Gardens” mentioned by Plinus, Pausanias and Lucian. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identified works
Talk:Alcmaeonidae

message: Why is Smith, Philip (1867). "Alcmaeonidae". In William Smith. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. 1. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. pp. 105–106. http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0114.html - an 1867 reference - being used as a consistent primary source in an encyclopaedic article? Virtually none of that reference material has any validity anymore. Particularly, in the area of archaeology and history when these books were compiled essentially by treasure hunters... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Obsolete Reference Materials 

message: Hi, 
Can you make the search for Alkmeonids redirect to this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.233.175.221 (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Paul August ☎ 21:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can Alkmeonids redirect  here? 

message: The dates in the article recently changed dates from BCE to BC by Ficaia without discussion. Most of the dates were added by SiegalSchwall70, who wrote most of this article. Before that, the article was a stub. BCE is more commonly used in academic and scientific texts. Talib1101 (talk) 23:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing BC with BCE
Talk:Sleepwalkers (1992 film)

message: The article states that "cats either evolved as a natural predator, or they were bred to hunt Sleepwalkers (which, given the number of cats in the world, would explain why Charles and Mary might be the last of their kind)."
From the movie, it looks more likely that the cats attack sleepwalkers out of territorial reasons, showing aggressive behavior directed at a rival species. The above quote from the article pertains to a predator-prey relationship which is not supported by the cats' behavior. (For example they do not eat killed sleepwalkers.) It is also unlikely that cats were bred to hunt sleepwalkers as all cats in the movie show an instinctive aggressive stance toward sleepwalkers, and training is not hereditary.
84.206.41.100 09:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cats

message: I notice its absent critics reviews, aren't there any out there?--74.133.210.229 (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: How did critics like it?

message: Sorry but Stephen King has been quoted as saying, " I decided to take what I'd learned and write an original screenplay, and I had a bloody good time doing it,"  about sleepwalkers.  So where does this notion come from?18abruce (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What unpublished novel? 
Talk:Antenor

message: *Horace, Epp. i. 2. 9.
*Livy i. 1.
*Pindar, Pythia, v. 83.
*Pausanias, 1.8.5
were all listed by the page. They don't belong to the EB article, so they need to be examined, used to expand the article, and then cited. — LlywelynII 12:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:Matt Birkbeck

message: This will be difficult to obtain as there aren't really that many places one could mention Mr. Birkbeck on Wikipedia, but I just added a little something about the woman who was the main focus of his 2004 book A Beautiful Child.  Her most well-known alias was Sharon Marshall, so I figured I'd add a little something about this person on top of the article describing the British media personality who was actually born with said name before eventually expanding on said information on a future article about the unknown kidnapped female.  I will also attempt to create a Wiki article about the book, perhaps even before I get to creating the Marshall article.  So please give me a chance to do all of these things as it might take me some time to accomplish all of that.  Thanks.  (Krushsister 07:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for inside linkage 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Slugs (1988 film)

message: I presume that this budget isn't accurate. 2404:130:0:1000:224:81FF:FE5F:B1D2 (talk) 04:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget $31.08
Talk:Buckhannon, West Virginia

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 21:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Cities

message: I removed "Skateboarding" from the "See Also" section.  It appeared to have no relevance.  I also added external links to news stories relating to crime in Buckhannon.--Scochran4 (talk) 17:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Skateboarding
Talk:History of the Otago Region

message: I'm copy-editing this page at the moment, and am unsure about how to best refer to the groupings in early Māori history. I'm erring on the side of changing 'tribe' to 'iwi' but unsure about whether the tribes mentioned can be defined as iwi or fall under hapu. Is there a MoS-type document referring to the best practices for this? Dudsud (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Tribe' vs 'iwi'

message: I think that this article, along with many New Zealand articles are grossly over-representing the maori culture and influence, especially when all important and relevant history in south island provinces and towns has been created by white settlers, and of the million people in the south island over 90% are white.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayden5650 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has only recently been started, and the editor doing most of the work on it is working forward chronologically. Understandably, that means that the Maori history of the region is currently over-represented, but this will change as the page is further edited to include more recent history. Grutness...wha? 22:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Many of the problems relating to "over-representation" are simply related to the current coverage of the page. As it stands, the article is incomplete, inasmuch as the pre-European and pre-Colonial period has been thoroughly covered but little has yet been written on the period since 1848. If that is extended in the same depth, then there woll be no apparent over-representation. As it stands, what is here is good material, and any solution to a perceived imbalance to the page is better addressed by expanding the shorter sections than by reducing the longer ones. Grutness...wha? 08:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Over representation of Maori period

message: I have been making some additions, please be bold Dushan Jugum (talk) 03:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions on the 2018-2019 rewrite
Talk:United Microelectronics Corporation

message: There is a contradition: the article says that the headquarters is in both Taiwan and Singapore.
ICE77 (talk) 18:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Their web site says their headquarters are located in Hsinchu, Taiwan.  Singapore is only where one of their fabs/offices is located, but isn't their global headquarters. I'm correcting the image caption to reflect this. -Multivariable (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UMC (company). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  feminist (talk) 16:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "UMC (company)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]