Talk:Energy Task Force

message: I removed Category:Government of the United States from this page as this is not a formal government agency, branch or department.  This Government of the U.S. cat is for institutions of the government.
Epolk 22:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed a Cat 

message: This aricle stands as a benchmark example of ideologs in 'acamedia' (secular progressives) taking over how an issue is defined and the Wikipedia fairness doctrine is violated...viz: "people report, possible corruption, etc." indeed! A major offense to the encyclopedic project and revolting to witness the denial that the approach 'smacks' of any bias.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.246.65.114 (talk) 17:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Stephen Colbert put it well when he said that "facts have a well-known liberal bias".  It's funny: I don't see any White House website dealing with the details surrounding this group.  No information sheet.  No minutes.  No attendance records that I've found.  (It's fair that energy policy be kept confidential for national security reasons.  It begs explanation, however, why someone's mere _participation_ is a matter of confidence).  Instead, what we see is that the only news about this group is bad news.  News that strongly suggests bad faith on the part of those running the group and on the part of those who participated in it.  If this appraisal is not fair it is partly _because_ of a lack of disclosure by "the other side".  If they'd like to present "their side" they're invited to. LeoTrottier (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistent Left-Wing POV Here 

message: I am a student at GGC. As part of my course project, I plan to make a few changes to make this article better. Undoubtedly, the page is not neutral. I also feel that it is very dull, as it has no images, or any other illustrations.  I feel that the quotes given needs to be paraphrased and cited properly. I also would like to add other industrialized countries that have a similar task force and how their strategy is working for them. I feel it would be nice to have U.S strategies compared to other countries. If there is something that I do that does not follow Wikipedia's guidelines, I will gladly take the constructive criticism and try to make it better. I41hope (talk) 02:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Makeover 

message: I flagged the Controversy section of this article for POV dispute.  I did some editing of the section, to clean up some of its language, fix some of its references, and remove speculatory remarks.  Some of the contents still seems accusatory and may not really indicate controversy (for instance - the frequent use of the phrase "big oil companies", also mentioning "energy companies" and "energy industry" as if somehow it was controversial for energy industry representatives to meet with an energy task force designed to investigate energy industry needs).  As well, when I happened upon the article, some of the references and cross-references were actually hard-links to Center for American Progress articles which were explicitly partisan.  I think that I cleaned it up pretty well, but I need a fresh set of eyes on this, to establish it's neutrality.Thegeniusboy05 (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy POV 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Energy Task Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060420223244/http://www.boston.com:80/news/nation/articles/2004/10/04/energy_bill_a_special_interests?pg=2 to http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/10/04/energy_bill_a_special_interests?pg=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Energy Task Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907091844/http://www.judicialwatch.org/cheneycase.shtml to http://www.judicialwatch.org/cheneycase.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427191714/http://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2002/mar/maps-and-charts-iraqi-oil-fields to http://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2002/mar/maps-and-charts-iraqi-oil-fields
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427191714/http://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2002/mar/maps-and-charts-iraqi-oil-fields to http://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2002/mar/maps-and-charts-iraqi-oil-fields
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427191714/http://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2002/mar/maps-and-charts-iraqi-oil-fields to http://www.judicialwatch.org/story/2002/mar/maps-and-charts-iraqi-oil-fields
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011203652/http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/8-secrets-of-cheneys-energy-task-force-come-to-light/ to http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/8-secrets-of-cheneys-energy-task-force-come-to-light/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified