lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Right axis deviation

message: The first sentence of this article is completely incomprehensible to those of us who do not already have a basic medical education.  Please expand. Bwrs (talk) 23:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first sentence of this article is completely incomprehensible to those of us who do not already have a basic medical education.  Please expand. Bwrs (talk) 23:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: thumb|Figure 3. Leads I and III appear to be 'leaving' in Left Axis Deviation; Leads I and III appear to be 'reaching' in Right Axis Deviation|314x314px
Figure 3 is wrong. 
The normal axis is from -30 to +90. The perpendicular axis to -30 is lead II. Therefore an axis of -30 is isoelectric in lead II. With left axis deviation, lead II becomes negative.
From "The ECG Made Easy" by John Hampton, 8th edition, page 16: "If in lead II the S wave is greater than the R wave, the axis must be more than 90° away from lead II. In other words, it must be at a greater angle than -30°, and closer to the vertical, and left axis deviation is present." Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: agree w/ Axl, the reference supports the text--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure 3
Talk:Schwartzman reaction

message: Consider merging the articles on Schwartzman reaction and Shwartzman phenomenon. BM 24.34.207.168 (talk) 13:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged the two. Patricia Meadows (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shwartzman vs. Schwartzman
Talk:Service de santé des armées

message: I suggest Service de santé des armées and French Defence Health service be merged, because they refer to the same service and are prestently complementary. Therefore I do not know English-speaking Wikipedia habits for the choice of the title : the name in French or the translation. Moreover, I am on holiday until January 7. O. Morand (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ruy González de Clavijo

message: >>>  11:36, 23 October 2007 FisherQueen (Talk | contribs) (38 bytes) (Is there a reason you want two identical articles about the same person? Please discuss on talk page before reverting) 
The point is that Gonzáles is the wrong spelling and González is the right one. It is just an elementary Spanish language (either modern or medieval) fact.
Therefore, the right arrangement in Wikipedia is to put the full article text in "González", and redirect "Gonzáles" there. And this is what I intended and what I am pretty sure I did. Of course, for a  short time there was some inconsistency while I finished to edit both entries.
Do you agree, now?
:I don't mind much which one is the main article and which is the redirect; feel free to switch them.  Somehow between us, we had them fixed so they each redirected to the other, which was entertaining but not informative :).  I changed it so there was one article and one redirect, but I don't care if you change which is the article and which is the redirect. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Johnny Seay

message: The subject of this article has previously made corrections to this article here and here and I edited the article accordingly per WP:BLP.  The subject-made corrections are also copied here for future reference:
(Correction to the above by Johnny Seay)...("I left the Louisiana Hayride in 1960 and moved to Nashville. Recorded a couple more sides for NRC Records, then signed with Capitol Records and this was the first time my name appeared on a record as Johnny (SEAY), for a couple of release's. (I battled to have my name spelled correctly from the beginnpng.)  I moved to Hollywood in late 1961 at the request of Johnny Western to try and get some movie or TV work in westerns. That didn't go so well, but I met Ben Johnson through Johnny Western and he got me a job on is father-in-law's ranch where I worked for over a year. While working there, Shelby Singleton called and ask if I was tried of cowboying, I said no, and he said "would you like to come to Nashville and record for Philips Records. I said yes, and he said he would send me and airline ticket. I cashed the ticket in and hitched a ride with Marty Robbins on his bus to Nashivlle. Marty just happened to be playing a show in North Hollywood at the time. After getting settled back in Nashille, I moved my wife and babies back there and stayed until 1969. Then I moved to Justiceburg, Texas and became an $8.00 a day cowboy again on a 160,000 acre ranch. I a lot more fun than being a singer in Nashville"...)
In 1964 he began recording again, and his "My Baby Walks All Over Me" and "My Old Faded Love" became country chart successes. Signing with Warner Bros. Records in 1966, he released the song "Day For Decision", a spoken-word response to Barry McGuire's "Eve of Destruction" ((Correction by Johnny Seay))("I had nener heard Berry McGuuire's record "Eve of Destruction when I recorded "Day for Decision".)  
Please contact me for any questions or concerns.  Cheers.  ♫ Cricket02  (talk) 03:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject-corrected edits
Talk:Perfect Circle (song)

message: Anyone have a source for the Bill Berry attribution?  I've heard the band claim this in various live recordings (of somewhat questionable legality), but can't find a legit source.  I also recall hearing Stipe say something about this during a radio interview back when Up was released, but wouldn't be able to cite it from memory.  Can anyone help?  Sbacle 20:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source that at least attributes the song to Berry.  A better source that backs up the whole sentence would be much appreciated if anyone has one. Sbacle (talk) 23:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shone's syndrome

message: : John D. Shone
Minnesota cardiologist, worked in 1960s http://www.mondofacto.com/facts/dictionary?Shone,+John http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1018113/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=search&db=PubMed&term=%20Shone%2BJD[auth]--Jerzy•t 08:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  John D. Shone
Talk:Iggy Vs. the Volcano/A Dip in the Pole

message: Why is it everybody just goes and deletes pages which are incomplete, rather than try to improve them? Doesn't anyone care for anyone else? I'm sure there's a site where it is mentioned when this episode first aired, and who wrote and produced it, and all the other missing info. Don't go and delete something before it's even had a chance to improve. Whatever happened to patience and common sense? Wilhelmina Will 20:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mahamat Nouri

message: Mohammed Nour Abdelkerim is the same person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Curiositykilednoone (talk • contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't agree with the claim that Mohammed Nour Abdelkerim and Mahamat Nouri are the same person; birthdates differ by 13 years and descriptions on the page are different. Removing merge templates given that this proposal is now stale and without support. Klbrain (talk) 20:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:I'll Still Kill

message: Aren't small passages supposed to sport {{ cquote instead of the regular one? —KarmaLoop (talk) 04:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  is used to highlight certain phrase or sentence.  is used for longer quotes, for example answers to questions. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A block quote () is used if it's over four lines. See WP:MOSQUOTE. Spellcast (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: Does no one else agree that it would be a valuable addition to put in an article of the lyrics on the page of the song  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.200.229 (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can go to LyricWiki for that.   UzEE  (Talk • Contribs) 05:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Can anyone provide the track listing for ?   UzEE  (Talk • Contribs) 05:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Listing 
Talk:Somatosensory amplification

message: Hello, I am going to edit this article as part of a university assignment until around the 23rd of February. This would be my first time editing a Wikipedia article. I will be using mostly review articles from Google Scholar, PubMed, and other freely-accessible sources. I plan to describe the SSAS in more detail, expand on symptomatology, and add various traits of SSA as well as other conditions it is linked to. I would be glad to listen to anybody offering suggestions towards how to structure the article or where to find sources. I plan to write a 750-1000 word draft in my sandbox before making an edit to the article. --Username7755 (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan to edit article as part of university assignment 

message: There are a few contradictions in this article, enough that it would make a reader wonder if somatosensory amplification is even a real and true medical issue. Within the first section the legitimacy of this condition is invalidated by the admission that "It is unclear whether persons with SSA have a truly increased physiological sensitivity to bodily sensations." If it is unknown whether people with SSA actually have increased physiological sensitivity then one cannot make the judgement that their somatic experience is excessive.
"SSA has features of an enduring trait, but it is also state-like." Even though this is sourced it remains a complete contradiction. Perhaps it would be better to refer to sources that have a concrete consensus. Psilacetin (talk) 07:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs work
Talk:Somatotopic arrangement

message: I'm not at my best today, so I'll leave this decision up to someone else, just in case the minor differences have some meaning I don't understand. --Geekdiva (talk) 03:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, this is a much better image, Geekdiva. Feel free to add it, and thanks for finding it! --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wouldn't the following image be better?
Talk:DZXL

message: Hmm, at some point MSJapan is also right, maybe this page needs more sufficient sources rather than the main website itself. For now, I reverted it back to its article form, but to all editors I hope you can find more reliable (either secondary or tertiary) sources for this article. But still I'm not convinced yet that such existing stations needs to be challenged and redirected to its main page. Though at some point, some of our network stations here in the Philippines is very privatious and very cautious when it comes to their profile history. I hope you won't mind this. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 04:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DZXL unsourced materials 

message: I have removed the following from the main article's history section as it is unsourced. This (or parts of it) may be reinstated but only when reliable sources are found. Diff of removal --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced history 

message: Any further discussions go here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Calapan

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tacloban City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 07:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The business listing is removed because WP is not a directory, see WP:NOTDIRECTORY. It would be much better to expand the Economy section with descriptions on the various business sectors. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Business listings
Talk:Spectrum bias

message: My opinion/view/thounghts is that this topic can be hard on those unfamiliar with the matter. I propose, as an example and in particular, to rewrite the very first sentence of the article to start things off with something understandable and telling about the subject, after hich the article can go on explaing in more detail and such. I also propose creating a Simple English article of this, possibly instead of the above. I speak partly from own experience and partly from things I've seen on other articles and stuff other users etc. have said in various places. I just want this article to be as good, and in "good" "understandable" is included, in reality in whatever matter that may be. - Bjørnar Munkerud 27/01/2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:C440:20:1116:A4CF:5593:5C31:7E28 (talk) 10:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hard to understand
Talk:Diffuser (automotive)

message: This is a terrible article which confuses the name for a single class of aerodynamic device (a diffuser) with many other aerodynamic devices, such as splitters, intakes, ducts and wings.  I doubt the author of the second section has any understanding of the subject matter whatsoever.  Needs completely rewriting. 86.136.208.207 00:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, not to mention there are numerous grammatical errors throughout the article, it need to be reduced in size dramatically until a rewrite can occur.--71.120.66.246 (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And it is horribly condescending...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.65.130 (talk) 07:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a Refimprove template. The article seems to have been rewritten since the discussion above but it still needs additional reliable sources. --Cryonic07 talk ° contribs 20:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual basis
Talk:Straphangers Campaign

message: Name dropping Obama does nothing to tell us about the organization. He did not found or lead the organization so his involvement would be more appropriate in the Barack Obama ecyclopedia entry.  Whatsmore, the only reference in the article is in regard to Obama, and it is only an old blog that can't be found online- thus it is unverifiable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnyhottrod (talk • contribs) 23:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems the sort of thing that, if verifiable, belongs to a trivia section.  Jim.henderson (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is referenced by amNY which is a free daily newspaper circulated in New York City by Newsday.  The article is definitely weak but all you are doing is taking referenced material off the table rather than adding anything of value to the article. It is also a flag when almost the only edits aer concerning this one topic.Americasroof (talk) 00:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will also add that it is just plain weird to take off the references and external links and then throw a prod on the article saying there are no references!!!! Americasroof (talk) 01:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama 

message: Please see WP:EL before adding links: "Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links, or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links". I added the link to the campaigns official website.Jonnyhottrod (talk) 05:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Section moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation#G Service for centralized discussion. Tinlinkin (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  G Service
Talk:Andy Nelson's Southern Pit Barbecue

message: I Contest this page deltion beucase i Feel that the sources i provide give it notabilty. The Award source on the page has links to about 5 other awards it has had for "Best BBQ".
Here are some awards.
 year 07
 year 06
 year 05
 year 04
 year 03
 year 02
Thoguh from the same source it cleary shows that it has won the "Best BBQ" multiple times therefore giving it some notablilty. I did not think notabilty was an issue, I was going to go this week to the resturant to find some other awards the have hanging around so i can find the manuscript of them and add them to the article. ForeverDEAD 23:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I contest Deletion 
Talk:Prostitution in Singapore

message: I'm not sure why my external link is not allowed here (geylangredlightdistrict.com) - this is a far less "spammy" site than your #1 external ("Singapore Sex Guide").  At least my site contains valuable insights into the red light culture of Singapore, and adds value to your links collection.
What is your criteria for banning me?  Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.103.91.101 (talk) 06:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: Xinjiapo: There are a couple of problems with your direct link to the page from your/someone's blog with a video on it:
1) You should not link directly from the text to an external site, instead you should link it in as a reference, 
2) The sentence you use is "A popular video at http://singapore.welcumed.com brings you to an online tour to red light districts and prostitution in Singapore". It's just not an objective fact that this video is "popular", and the use of a URL in-line in the text is not the way we do it on Wikipedia. 
3) The blog you're linking to is a commercial operator, selling a product. While this does not disqualify linking to it, it certainly means you need to have a really good reason for doing so. There's already a link to the blog in the External Links-section, so another link to a specific blog entry is not really called for.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uspn (talk • contribs) 16:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Use

message: http://www.viet-studies.info/kinhte/Viet_Women_in_Singapore.htm
http://sglinks.com/pages/1831389-vietnamese-prostitutes-openly-prowl-chinatown
http://web.archive.org/web/20111030004816/http://sg.news.yahoo.com/vietnamese-prostitutes-openly-prowl-chinatown.html
http://www.businessnavigator.net/vietnamese-prostitutes-openly-prowl-chinatown-in-singapore.html
Rajmaan (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign prostitutes in Singapore 
Talk:University of Washington Bothell

message: Hi, I'm currently a student at this school, and I was wondering if I could add a section about notable current or past faculty who have wiki pages, like Amaranth Borsuk (took a class with her) and Jennifer McLoud-Mann? I think it'd be cool to add, particularly if their achievements are a part of this section. ChessPiece21 (talk) 13:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Faculty Section?
Talk:John Burke (American football)

message: --Russcote 21:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cygnus Solutions

message: Just to let you know. The purpose of selecting an article is both to point readers to the article and to highlight it to potential contributors. It will remain on the portal for a week or so. The previous selected article was QTFairUse, the controversial software for bypassing Digital Restrictions Management.
For other interesting free software articles, you can take a look at the archive of PFs selectees.  --Gronky 21:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Time moved on and the new selectee is Darwin (operating system) - the free software base of Apple's proprietary software operating system. --Gronky 16:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Free software]]: Cygnus is now the selected article 

message: There is a website at http://www.cygnus-solutions.com/, but is it the same company that the article talks about? Or is it a new company that has taken over the URL? The company deals with hardware and software, but it doesn't seem to be interested in open source. --HelgeStenstrom (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally different. Seems to me like borderline trademark violation, but Red Hat doesn't use the Cygnus name anymore, and it's even possible that these guys got permission from RH to reuse. Stan (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company website. New company?
Talk:Crown Street railway station

message: I just saw this section, not sure why this is relevant on this page apart from the close locality, I think it should be on the Merseyrail "Future Stations" section. The line/tunnel (Wapping) that has been quoted is NOT the tunnel that sits under the site (Victoria/Waterloo). Babydoll9799 (talk) 09:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the article, the tunnel under the Crown Street site is indeed the Wapping tunnel as shown on p.36 of the recent Spacial Plan. There may be some confusion with the Paddington area which is the primary focus of the Plan.CastWider (talk) 23:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Potential new station"

message: Should this be Chatsworth or Chatsworth Street Cutting? This is the terminology used in the industrial archaeology conducted on the site which is cited in the report by Connolly https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:123553 CastWider (talk) 23:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cavendish Cutting 

message: As Crown Street was a terminus there should not be a preceding station, Park Lane running into first Edge Hill station rather than Crown Street. Given that second Edge Hill station opened as Crown Street closed to passengers, it would seem logical to cite the first Edge Hill station which is, of course, closed. Neither were strictly speaking on the LNWR as passenger stations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CastWider (talk • contribs) 23:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Next" and "Previous" are perhaps misleading. They're merely arbitrary terms for the two stations on either side. A common convention is that  (which displays on the right) is used for the adjacent station to the east or south, whereas  (which displays on the left) is used for the adjacent station to the west or north. In this way it is a simple matter to follow a route, station article by station article, by keeping your mouse pointer towards the left or towards the right and clicking through to each adjacent one. This then means that of the two termini of a line, the westernmost one will lack a  and so display Terminus in its left-hand column; and the easternmost one will lack a  and so display Terminus in its right-hand column. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query about station sequence 

message: I see that this has been added to the category John Cunningham Railway Stations. While it is plausible that Cunningham did work at Crown Street when it was a goods and maintenance yard, it seems unlikely that he designed the first Crown Street station given that he was based in Scotland at the time. This needs to be clarified. CastWider (talk) 09:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Cunningham
Talk:Collapse!

message: I removed the additional citations tag. It has been around since 2008 and it seems very well-referenced now. Leefkrust22 (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag 
Talk:Someone to Watch Over Me (Frasier)

message: Please realized that "over" in this case is not a preposition but part of the two-word phrasal verb "watch over".  Phrasal verbs are typically capitalized and this is discussed in the WP:music project for album and song titles in WP:MUSTARD.  I know this isn't a music article but the same principal applies. --Wolfer68 (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved