Talk:Yasin Malik

message: Tim Sebastian and talk between Yasin Malik puts no admission by Yasin Malik that he or JKLF has killed those people. But Yasin Malik challenged the trial of the court has not begun yet. Bilalahmadj (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Kunal Mystry, do you have a citation to support the killing of the IAF officers and funding terrorism in 2017? Jurisdicta (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yasin Malik Didn't accept that he killed those Airforce people. 

message: Could the author please make this article a bit more readable? You could maybe begin by splitting the sentence into paragraphs. Also there appears to be a lot of un-verified matter. Nitin (talk) 07:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve this article

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Yasin Malik's trial resumes in Jammu
After a delay of almost 3 decades, the trial of Yasin Malik in 1990 Indian Air Force personnel killing case resumed on Wednesday at the TADA court in Jammu
https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/1990-iaf-personnel-killing-case-yasin-malik-trial-resumes-1598187-2019-09-12
A TADA court on September 7 had issued non-bailable warrants against Yasin Malik and others allegedly involved the killing of four Indian Air Force (IAF) personnel inKashmir in 1990.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/yasin-malik-not-only-killed-my-husband-but-ruined-us-slain-iaf-officer-s-wife/story-kfX3CkGXIVDXlq3NOJS6ML.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rameshaha (talk • contribs) 07:18, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 IAF personnel killing case 

message: I want to suggest changes in Twitter profile of Yasin Malik. Link to his official Twitter account is https://mobile.twitter.com/Da_Influenzer Thehoodhero (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Account is not verified, we would need reliable sources naming that as his account. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 June 2021 

message: Karan Karankapadiya (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 March 2022 

message: 2409:4050:DBB:4913:9FF:9327:203A:B9DF (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 March 2022 

message: The last line of the intro mentions that the subject has renounced violence and has adopted peaceful methods for his cause. Being in the intro of the article mandatorily means that such claims have to be supported. Please add a citation.Intensearistocrat (talk) 12:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last line of intro 

message: Shall we change the infobox on the page from Infobox Officeholder to Infobox Criminal so that we can add the Criminal Status, Charges, Conviction considering he is now a convict and waiting to receive sentencing on 25 May.  This revert is the context. >>> Extorc.talk 17:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it to Infobox person. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Infobox criminal is to be used if the criminality is the main notability, not otherwise. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the main notability here? >>> Extorc.talk 18:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

text: I would say that this Secessionism/ Militancy/ Terrorism is the main notability here. >>> Extorc.talk 18:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Stop glorifying Terrorist & their actions. This Wikipedia page is full of lies & false information. Well I think Wiki’s is funded by Separatist’s group so no wonder all praise for Terrorist like Yasin Malik 😡 65.95.200.220 (talk) 22:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two sides to every story. Yasin Malik is a notable human, and deserves a Wikipedia page. Stick to the facts, and quote your sources. Wikipedia is not about pursuing agendas, it is about recording human history. Cheers. Billyshiverstick (talk) 05:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop glorifying Terrorist‘S 

message: Yasin Malik was a Pakistani terrorist who went to Kashmir through PoK and killed lakhs of Kashmiri Hindu Pandits, forcefully turning them into a Muslim and accusing women and girl child. 146.196.36.143 (talk) 00:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. 💜  melecie  talk - 01:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 May 2022 

message: I appreciate that English is not the first language of the authors, however, the phrase "it is said" has no place in Wikipedia. It is a weasel phrase. Please insert your content with "Journalist So and So said" where you want to use this phrase. Thanks. "Who said?"  Billyshiverstick (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this about the , ,  in the article or something else? Kindly Contextualize. >>> Extorc.talk 06:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you can prove that that is the only journalist who said such a thing, you can add an in-text attribution. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Extorc - yes, those are the types of phrases I'm highlighting. The word "said" is the giveaway. Unless it refers to a subject eg: "said Winston Churchill"  with a citation for the quote. Does that make sense? Thanks for listening. If I get a minute, I'll adjust some. I'm too busy this week though. Billyshiverstick (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

text: @Kautilya3, for now I have removed the "is said to have" from these instances because they are very unnessecary considering they are not brought in the source as stories or standalone claims. If required, in-text attributions can be added in future. >>> Extorc.talk 10:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Billyshiverstick, it does appear that these phrases need not be present there in the way they are mentioned. I have cleaned the ones I could here. >>> Extorc.talk 11:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is said... 

message: this is used but does not have a definition listed on wiki Spacemeatsheep (talk) 02:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "booth-capturing" 

message: This phrasing seems really awkward. It would be more comprehensible if it was changed to "Malik disagrees by saying, "Let me clear it, rigging in 1987 elections didn't result in armed militancy. We were there even before 1987. Roostery123 (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that is fine. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward phrasing 

message: Add the following image File:Protesta a favor de l'alliberament del Yasin Malik.jpg to 2017 terror funding case's section with the following chart: Protest in Barcelona (Catalonia) in favour of the release of Yasin Malik on 29 May 2022. KajenCAT (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: This is actually a controversial edit, so you'll need to discuss first with other editors. Please open a new section here and start a discussion. No boosterism. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 May 2022 

message: Migfab008 (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. >>> Extorc.talk 14:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 May 2022 

message: Yasin Malik was convicted under the Indian penal code of POTA, someone who supports and promotes terrorism. The article calls him a separatist leader which is inconsistent with his current status.
Unless someone is challenging the Indian legal system, Mr. Malik must be called a terrorist. 2603:8001:B341:332A:911A:9191:9117:BBCC (talk) 07:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree Wikipedia is too biased toward left in politics related articles Rajeshwar Singh (talk) 15:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian judicial system has convicted him under POTA which makes him a terrorist and not a separatist leader as mentioned in the article. Unless there is a strong reason to support what is written, he should be called a terrorist. 

message: he killed so many people in terror activities and people still call him separatist leader, Hypocrisy is real on Wikipedia. Rajeshwar Singh (talk) 15:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is written by summarising reliable sources. Please cite the sources for any new information you would like to see. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/5/19/yasin-malik-india-convicts-top-kashmir-separatist-of-terrorism Rajeshwar Singh (talk) 09:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

text: https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/tada-court-holds-yasin-malik-prima-facie-responsible-for-iaf-officer-killing-1655606-2020-03-14 Rajeshwar Singh (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please state what in these sources allows Wikipedia to call him a a "terrorist". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: He killed air force officer, funded terrorism and was proved guilty in court and sentenced, is this not enough to call him terrorist Rajeshwar Singh (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: At this Point i really don't care if this article mention him as terrorist or not, i don't want to argue further, let it be as it is now. Rajeshwar Singh (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this article doesn't Mention him as a terrorist