Talk:10th Battalion (Australia)

message: G'day all, is there a reason that Lock isn't even listed as further reading? I know it was published in 1936, but it is one of the "straightest" accounts of the battalion ever published. No puffery, bare facts. Thoughts? Peacemaker67  (send... over) 10:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, PM, an oversight on my part. I've added it now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you see him as too old for use as a reference? He certainly has lots of detailed information about the battalion's moves etc, that others don't. Peacemaker67  (send... over) 10:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, no I think it would be okay to use Lock as a ref (I believe it was actually reprinted by the IWM recently). I haven't done so because I haven't been able to get a hold of the work yet. If you have it, or can get it from somewhere, please feel free to add those details in. I think it would be good to expand it a little more before taking it to ACR. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I have a copy of the IWM reprint (gotta love the fact that it hasn't been reprinted in Aust, but the IWM...). I'll find it this weekend and look at areas that it could add some detail. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (send... over) 01:14, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, PM, thanks for adding that information from Lock. I've managed to obtain a copy through the work library (it was in stack apparently in Canberra). My copy is the original first edition, though. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 10th Battalion (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.army.gov.au/AHU/docs/A_Century_of_Service_Stanley.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Just did a light c/e etc, and am wondering about whether it is ready for ACR, however, I don't think Regiments.org is a reliable source. Are there any sources that could be used to replace Mills? Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 06:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, PM, most of it -- but not quite all -- can be replaced by Festberg, I think. I will go though it now. Regarding ACR, unfortunately I don't currently have access Lock or Kearney, I'm sorry. Otherwise, happy to help at ACR if I can. (Please note, though, that the second half of this year is really bad for me -- several courses to do for work, a couple of interstate trips etc. -- so I'd probably be relying on you for much of the ACR work, I'm sorry). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have Lock, and I am pretty sure I can get Kearney (I know Dogs, he must have a spare if I can't get it through the library). Regardless, I'm happy to do the heavy lifting during ACR, you have done by far the lion's share with this article thus far. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 07:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've adjusted the article now to remove Mills. These are my changes: . I also added some archiveurls. Please let me know if anything else needs adjusting. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much, AR. I'll pin down a copy of Kearney and see what else might be added from Lock before nominating. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 07:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  G'day, PM, I have managed to secure a copy of Kearney, Lock and Limb's works now -- at least for a month or so. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Copy, . Managed to get a copy of Dogs' book today, so I have Lock and Kearney as well. I'll nominate it now. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 09:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate source for Mills?