Talk:Aztlán

message: This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KMag11.
Hello Wikipedia community, I am a student in a Wikipedia educational course and would desire to edit parts of this article. I feel as though this article can use some expansion on the 'us by the chicano movement' sections. I would like to add how this myth has been used to unite Mexican-Americans in this identity. I also would just want to add a few more sentences to the 'places postulated by Aztlán' section. The source I am using can give some more insight on this area of the topic. The source I will be using to make my edits is titled 'Aztlán: Essays on the Chicano Homeland' and it is edited by Rudolfo Anaya, Francisco A. Lomelí, and Enrique R. Lamadrid. The most recent version of this source comes from 2017, so I think it is pretty reliable. If any of the community members have any suggestions grievances or to my potential edits I will be glad to hear them. S4mon (talk) 04:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: At the Aztec Exhibition at London's Royal Academy of Art, a couple of years ago, Aztlán was described as being 'an island to the east.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.208 (talk • contribs) October 23, 2006 (UTC)
:I've heard this mentioned often, but I've never found substantial evidence of it. Does anyone have confirmation that Aztlán was thought of as an island in the east? --Izzly (talk) 16:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It very clearly and emphatically was not thought to be that. This is just confusing Plato and Aztec myth because of what is perceived to be similar sounds. ·Maunus·ƛ· 16:49, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I enjoyed reading this article and making my evaluations on the topic. Very interesting. Arivenelle mckenzie (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

text: I would like to know more about how the Aztlán people work. Arivenelle mckenzie (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Aztlán 

message: What do you mean by an island to the east? East as in Japan, or east as some island in the Caribbean (east of Mexico)? The reason why I say Japan is that they found human remains in Hokkaido of 10,000 years ago (BCE) and the DNA of a few of the human remains was D-1 Haplogroup (which also has been traced to Mongolia, Siberia) which is the same DNA genetic markers that many of the Aztec human remains have. If Aztlan is Hokkaido, Japan, then that would make sense for we have genetic proof to do the matches.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.105.217 (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Aztlan Location

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Aztlán's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "WashingtonTimes":
From Reconquista (Mexico): 
From José Ángel Gutiérrez: Mexican aliens seek to retake 'stolen' land, Washington Times, April 16, 2006.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: checked and what's currently present looks good... Boogerpatrol (talk) 03:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Aztlán]] 

message: I'm pretty sure  it was included previously, and I don't  see any notes  that it was removed. I notice the list has changed and the  Marx-Lenin group was added. 74.60.161.158 (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was La Raza removed from Groups that advocate Aztlan? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Aztlán. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060103021137/http://www.arqueomex.com:80/S2N3nAZTLAN67.html to http://www.arqueomex.com/S2N3nAZTLAN67.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414025315/http://www2.nau.edu/~gender-p/Papers/Vollemarapdf.pdf to http://www2.nau.edu/~gender-p/Papers/Vollemarapdf.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060429215406/http://www.csuchico.edu:80/art/contrapposto/contrapposto01/242a/sanderson.html to http://www.csuchico.edu/art/contrapposto/contrapposto01/242a/sanderson.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Aztlán. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107032413/http://www.aztlan.net/homeland.htm to http://www.aztlan.net/homeland.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.arqueomex.com/S2N3nAZTLAN67.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.csuchico.edu/art/contrapposto/contrapposto01/242a/sanderson.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I noticed that neo-Nazi author Harold Covington's work is referenced in the "In Literature" section of this page. When I found it, his name was spelled wrong so the link didn't work. I fixed the link, and made it clear that he's a Nazi. However, I'm wondering if we shouldn't just remove the bullet point entirely. On the one hand, it's true and notable information (assuming that there really is a nation called Aztlán in his books- I haven't read them and don't really want to look them up). On the other, I generally feel like it's good practice to minimize Nazis' visibility online. Additionally, the edit was originally made by 23.111.165.2, an IP address that's since been blocked for edits that ranged from non-constructive to racially crude to harassment. Thoughts?
Aquaticonions (talk) 17:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you answered you question. If its notable, then there really isn't any reason to omit it. Garuda28 (talk) 17:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: But it isn't.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 20:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Neo-Nazi Author? 

message: If this is true, then there should be links to the SN1054 section of Crab Nebula page, and a link back.  This would add to Japanese and Chinese observations.  But only if it is true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasHarrisGrantsPass (talk • contribs) 03:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  SN 1054 Crab Nebula 

message: — Assignment last updated by S4mon (talk) 20:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Migration in World History