Talk:Rodarte

message: I was thinking that there's probably no need to list every celebrity who's worn the label, although that's more of a personal preference (at least I think it it, I haven't gone through the manual of style to see if there's a guideline somewhere). thoughts? --Bfigura (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paring Down celebrity list

message: Wikipedia:Verifiability  
"Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."
Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves
Policy shortcuts:
WP:ABOUTSELF
WP:SELFPUB
Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the requirement in the case of self-published sources that they be published experts in the field, so long as:
   1. the material is not unduly self-serving;
   2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
   3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
   4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
   5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camaroman (talk • contribs) 18:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Swan Controversy Removed 

message: I assume it's meant as a joke...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.3.249 (talk) 02:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bred, REALLY?

message: I added Dice Kayek, similar fashion enterprise run by another couple of sisters. It is a good "see also" example. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the fact that they are both fashion companies run by sisters is too tenuous to merit a see also link.  Any third opinions? Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: There doesn't appear to be enough reliable secondary sources for the sisters to have a stand alone article, as the majority of the coverage about them is about Rodarte - I think it's best if we just merge the sisters into this article in a specific section. Thoughts? Missvain (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Kate and Laura Mulleavy]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Rodarte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110501040705/http://www.metmuseum.org/press_room/full_release.asp?prid={9BDA9A52-D512-43E8-A216-AC7655B06ABF} to http://www.metmuseum.org/press_room/full_release.asp?prid={9BDA9A52-D512-43E8-A216-AC7655B06ABF}
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110929145604/http://www.artsusa.org/events/2010/naa/001.asp to http://www.artsusa.org/events/2010/naa/001.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100619231833/http://www.swisstextiles.ch:80/en/veranstaltungen/swiss_textiles_award/stella_fashion_night_2008/ to http://www.swisstextiles.ch/en/veranstaltungen/swiss_textiles_award/stella_fashion_night_2008/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: To my opinion, this edit is irrelevant and spam(my). According to the adding editor, it is a significant moment.
Please, can I hear your opinion? The Banner talk 16:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested edit