lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Israeli Combat Engineering Corps

message: "Israeli families and official also accused individuals in the UN force of aiding the abduction." This seems only as an unproven claim. Who has revealed what about UN involvement in this case? Jakro64 22:31, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Abduction story

message: At this article (and I think that at many others), Wikipiadians replace the term "Operation Peace for Galilee" at the term "1982 Lebanon War" with summaries like NPOV. These terms are not equivalent! The Operation Peace for Galilee refer here (and maybe at the others) to the three initial months of the war (This is the period of the Operation), so the article after the replacing contains less information. Troll Refaim 16:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Peace for Galilee vs 1982 Lebanon War 

message: I suggest moving all the equipment (mostly bulldozer) images in this article to a gallery section. This is because they have nothing to do with the sections they're in right now and there's no equipment section (which would be too small to host such a gallery anyway). -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion to gallery 
Talk:American Reform Party

message: This article doesn't seem to agree at all with the American Reform Party website, which says that the ARP is not a political party and does not run candidates.  Did the ARP change from a candidate party to whatever it is now?  Or did the old ARP go defunct and a new ARP take over the name?  Or are there two of them, and the web page is a different ARP than the article describes? Did "Reform Party candidates" all go back to what is now the Reform Party USA?  This is very confusing.  In any case, I think this article is severely outdated somehow. --Closeapple 07:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this non-party party?
Talk:Beyond Good & Evil (video game)

message: This video was put out and I'm wondering if anyone thinks it is worth inclusion or talking about. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 04:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  T vs. W - Positive Female Characters 

message: The final paragraph of the development section about the team being "demoralized" etc, is not properly sourced. The source makes no mention of this. However, the source might be the additional white section exclusive to the printed version which is visible here. The white section's content is, judging by screenshots, about the original form of the game. However, the scan is too small to read to confirm. So if anyone has access to Edge #157, plz check and edit appropriately. DreamingLady (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing citation - Edge #157 
Talk:Fifteen (TV series)

message: Is there any support for the contention that this show is more a Canadian property than a U.S. property, and should be listed under its Canadian title? As far as I can tell, that's the position of a single editor with no factual basis presented. Four of its categories refer either to American shows or Nickelodeon shows (the reason I became aware of this grave and deeply important issue is that I was looking for Fifteen in the 1990 Nickelodeon shows category); only one of its categories refers to Canadian shows. It would seem highly probable that more people know the show under its American title simply because America is much more populous and thus the show probably had more viewers in America. Propaniac (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB lists it as Hillside. --Qyd (talk) 23:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to also contest that this show should be referred to as Fifteen, and I don't think the IMDB is a good enough reason as they often can be a questionable source, especially on an old / obscure show like this. (And the IMDB has both Hillside and Fifteen listings anyway.) Regardless, since this topic was last discussed, Nickelodeon has put this show out on iTunes (the first season at least), and they officially call it "Fifteen: The Series," and not "Hillside." The official website's url following the release (now down) was also http://fifteentheseries.com. Considering the show was known as Fifteen through it's entire run and it's official digital release was put out under that name, unless someone can cite an official source or argument otherwise soon, I think the article should be properly retitled under it's better known name. Ends of the World (talk) 23:52, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been quite some time since this was last discussed with no rebuttal to the above to date, and in that time frame the show has also been featured on Hulu and Amazon Prime as "Fifteen." The Facebook page and past cast interviews on video also uses "Fifteen: The Series" title. This article will be moved to reflect it's common name. Ends of the World (talk) 15:48, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "Predominantly a Canadian show"?

message: It started in 1990, not in '91, I know this, because I watched it when it first started airing on YTV!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.91.156.84 (talk) 01:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  The 1991 to 1993 airings reflect the Nickelodeon schedule. The production dates on the credits of season one do start in 1990, which would support this for YTV. I will see if I can find archived YTV schedules for further confirmation and update accordingly. Ends of the World (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Hillside started in 1990
Talk:Meredith Monroe

message: IMDB says she was born in 1970, TV tome says 1976. Anyone clarify? PedanticallySpeaking 18:41, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
Two articles indicate the 1976 DOB is correct, to wit:
* "The Monroe Doctrine" by Kristen Baldwin. Entertainment Weekly. May 21, 1999. Page 58. Says she is twenty-two.
* "My body: Meredith Monroe" by Bailey Ross. Us. April 1999. Page 42. Also says she is twenty-two.
Assuming the December date is correct, that indicates the year is 1976. PedanticallySpeaking 16:54, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
:She graduated high school in 1988, so she definitely was not born in 1976. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnh123 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have a source for this, or the DOB presently in the article? PedanticallySpeaking 14:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My high school yearbook is the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnh123 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If Meredith Monroe graduated in 1988 how come she cannot be found in Hinsdale Central High School Yearbook of 1988.  She is not even on the swimming club pages even though she known to be a strong swimmer. Can you please state which pages she is on?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.139.244 (talk) 15:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Date 

message: Why the heck does wikipedia keep changing info so much.I live in Celebration,FL.My name is Jason Kushner — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.90.31.227 (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF 

message: At the start of Meredith Monroe career on Dawson Creek and the true story of Laura Welles why was Meredith known as Meredith Hoyt Monroe and later around 2005 became known as as Meredith Leigh Monroe? On IMDB and Sony Dawson Creek sites she was always referred as being born with the middle name Hoyt not Leigh.  There have been many conflicting stories about her age but why has her middle name not been consistent ? Jay99a (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It would properly be the best option to leave Meredith Monroe middle name out like her age, as you have said there is no way of identifying which is the right one Leigh or Hoyt.  There are equal amount of websites that have listed the actress as Meredith Leigh to the ones that have listed her as Meredith Hoyt. Jay99a (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The middle name 

message: I'd like to remind editors when adding information about a living person, you should cite the source of that information and that information should be a reliable source.  IMDB does not qualify as a reliable source for personal information beyond acting credits. Gamaliel (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing reliable sources 

message: Please use edit summaries, especially when making edits that are controversial or have been contentious. Gamaliel (talk) 21:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please use edit summaries
Template talk:Nuremberg Trial judges

message: I created  (seen to the left) and put it in all of the articles on the Nuremberg Trials judges. What I'd like to do is put a flag next to each pair of judges, indicating their nationality (a British flag for the top two, American flag for the next two, French last for the next two, and a Soviet flag for the final two). The problem is, I'm not exactly sure how I can do this. Can anyone help? Neutrality (talk) 22:31, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the flags to the template using some tables.  22:54, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Krik! Neutrality (talk) 22:55, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at this, it was momentarily unclear that the alternates were by nation. (I was reading it as two column, and analyzing the second column as lacking national designations. Would anyone be adverse to adding the flag at the right margin too? Oh, hell, I'll be bold and try it, and you be bold and tell me off if you don't like it. -- orthogonal 08:49, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Hopefully, we can get a Soviet flag that doesn't look like just a red rectangle. And is the UK flag slightly squashed vertically? But overall Neutrality, this looks really cool. -- orthogonal 08:56, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the French tricolore is the odd man out in terms of flag aspect ratio. This probably needs fixed. Actually, are the ratios correct for the current situation, or for the relevant historical period? zoney ▓█▒ talk 13:58, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: The UK flag is okay, but the soviet flag needs bolder yellow. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 21:23, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I saw that with the French flag, and made it slightly smaller to compensate. As for the Soviet, making it big enough to clearly show the hammer & sickle makes it very large indeed. -- orthogonal 09:28, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template help
Talk:Fūjin

message: Fujin is much more important in the context of Japanese mythology; multiple games/anime/manga, including Final Fantasy and Flame of Recca, have characters based on this name.  In addition, various places in China are named Fujin.--Confuzion 19:40, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: This should be a disambig page.  

message: Why is there a random picture of other wind gods on this page?  It seems not terribly relevant.  The page is about Fujin, not about wind deities in general. Penelope D 14:27, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added some explanations on origins. PHG 22:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: pictures

message: Part of this article seems to be copied from Encyclopedia Mythica's article on Fujin. Serasuna (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedia Mythica 

message: A legend of Japanese Buddhism states that Fūjin and Raijin, the god of thunder, were both originally evil demons who opposed Buddha . They were captured in battle with Buddha's army of heaven, and have worked as gods since then.　221.184.38.111 (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not make the legend of the fiction. 

message: He is said to have been present at the creation of the world and when he first let the winds out of his bag, they cleared the morning mists and filled the Gate between heaven and earth so the sun shone.
Where are sources of information? Such a tradition is not in Japan
http://www.nintendojo.com/features/specials/japanese-mythology-in-black-and-white This site uses a false source of information.　60.40.8.219 (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  creation of the world???? False information 

message: According to Kojiki, Fujin(Shina-Tsu-Hiko) was born from Izanami.
It is explained that it is the god of the wind(風神) by a commentary of Kojiki. 221.185.253.158 (talk) 08:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinto Myth. Fuijin is written by Kojiki.
Talk:Key fob

message: Can anyone clarify what "fob" means...is it an acronym? abbreviation?
:: It is actually a word, fob is a adornment that hangs from a chain or ring. --Thax 21:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is NOT synonymous with the term keychain. There are several Mercedes models where there is no actually key for the car, only keyless entry, a fob you keep in your pocket, and a start button which starts the car only if the fob is somewhere in the cabin. Darqcyde (talk) 16:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see it, off the top of my head, as a combination of the words FOndle and knoB. Maybe that's because I'm a guy? WonderWheeler (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Edward 12:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Photos already included Alex Muller 20:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request photograph

message: Who is the snob to request a reference cited for  commonly known object of every day life? Hence citation tag deleted, could be hold if more specific.Wireless friend (talk) 19:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please avoid personal attacks. More importantly please read Wikipedia's core rule on verifiability. Every article must include proper references, no matter how "commonly known" the subject is. This is a key requirement of Wikipedia. Thanks, Palltrast (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:FCKGW

message: I don't believe that it's appropriate to remove valuable information from an article on the dubious grounds that that information may aid illegal activity. Additionally, the product key in question can't be used to install current versions of Windows XP, and if you installed the first version of XP with that product key, you would be unable to obtain any security updates or other support from Microsoft. This makes the key in question pretty worthless.
I also removed mention of other supposed meanings of FCKGW. We know for certain that the key is randomly generated, so there can't be any hidden meaning to the letters FCKGW. Alereon June 30, 2005 13:06 (UTC)
I could randomly generate an infinite amount of strings until I get the entire message you posted, then choose that one.
: It's not -that- random. You can't just choose a certain order of letters and have a valid key.
Thats actually whats done in a lot of scene releases that include a keygen and a few keys -- Groups will often look for keys that are easy to remember (which "FCKGW" qualifies as, due to being so close to fuck). Or they'll go for a key that starts with their tag. IMO, alternative meanings (or at least a description like this) should go in the article, but I don't feel strongly enough to put it there or start an edit war.
--Semi 23:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a source for that (even the general statement about what groups do), I think it's really interesting and should be included. --Galaxiaad 00:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On enabling piracy and alternate meanings 

message: This article was recently nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/FCKGW for the archived discussion. -- Francs2000 | Talk  00:23, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived vfd discussion 

message: Should the image be changed to something that does not contain the full key for Windows XP?
As said above, it's kinda useless for any copy of Windows XP except one of the very first corporate ones.
: Wikipedia is not censored, except when it is. Haakon 15:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Legality? 

message: Windows XP - Cracked before launch data. CD-KEY Obscured for obvious reasons. Owner: If you know who took this picture contact piracy@microsoft.com
There is nothing ilegal/infringing about this image. The CD key is obscured.
Due to the nature of the image the owner is unlikley to come forward.
*unlikely to come forward means copyright is unattainable - which means it can never be appropriate on Wikipedia.  That does not put the picture in the public domain. SchmuckyTheCat 20:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yuck, that is absolutely false. OLD copyright law, like that one, depended on notice.  In modern law, existance of copyright doesn't depend on notice. SchmuckyTheCat 23:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Image talk:WinXP.Launch.FCKGW.jpg]]

message: I've been laughing for a while now, that someone actually made a page about that key. I had it memorized for years :-p Stonesour025 01:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Page
Talk:A Time to Love (album)

message: I believe Stevie is the Producer on the album... can anybody confirm that?  Readparse 16:11, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer 
Talk:Baserunning

message: Should we combine baserunning and baserunner? --Locarno 21:42, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've wondered, is there any kind of rule on what happens when a baserunner is hit by the ball after another player hits it? Kraki 01:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep.  Assuming it has not bounded directly past a fielder, that runner is out for interference.  See also Interference_%28baseball%29#Offensive_interference.  Locarno 18:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Sayaun Thunga Phulka

message: This probably belongs on     wikisource. Marnanel 22:06, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  User Comment in article 

message: The following text was removed from the article:
"[Friends this National Anthem is not sing now, because it praised the crucial democracy of the king, so please if you can compose a new song as our new National Anthem, this song is not valid now after gaining the rule of people in Nepal , Thank you , Commentator Shashin Neupane , E-mail to nshashin@gmail.com for comments and suggestion] --Nshashin 05:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User comment in article 

message: Is the melody of the new anthem the same as that of the old? -- Picapica 21:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, a new melody has just been selected.Inkan1969 00:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melody 

message: As the House of Representatives of Nepal (The Pratanidhi Shabha) declared "Sayaun Thunga Phool Ka" as the National Anthem of Nepal on August 3rd, I have updated the page to reflect the recent changes. I have also removed the texts of the old national anthem as it no longer is relevant to this article. --Indiver 04:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offical Declaration 
Talk:Taliska

message: Tolkien actually worked out a rather complete grammar and syntax of Taliska,
But what about the vocabulary? -- SS 22:12, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As I do not have access to Vinyar Tengwar, where it was to be published, I couldn't tell you. There was apparently a basic vocabulary as well.  22:16, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  So something was published, at least in VT... should the article text be changed? -- SS 22:22, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it was being worked on, not sure if it was actually published already. Revised comment above.  15:10, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, thanks for the clarification.  -- SS 11:24, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text:  Did you mean Parma Eldalamberon?  (How does one find back issues of PE?) —Tamfang (talk) 02:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocab 

message: :
This could be clearer.  He considered using Taliska (rather than OE) in the book?  Or merely that maybe OE is to be considered as the translation of Taliska (rather than of a distant cousin of Taliska)? —Tamfang (talk) 02:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rohirric
Talk:Monoecious

message: The redirect is absurd.  This term is common in zoology when dealing with lower invertebrates. --Scottandrewhutchins 17:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Scottandrewhutchins can you provide some cites?  If so we should make this a disambiguation page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Plant sexuality?

message: I've just given the article on these terms an extensive going-over. Might it now be a more suitable target for the redirect? Liam Proven (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that is a different term, with a different meaning and applicability , not just a different spelling. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:21, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monoicous/dioicous
Talk:Early modern Britain

message: Here's my attempt -- the major historical events I note in the introduction should all be significant sections, I think.  I can do a lot on English Reformation (my field of graduate study) when I get time, but this will take many contributors, and no one should think any of it my turf. :-)  Let's write as much as we can, and develop an outline as we go -- this will be a work in progress for a while, I'm sure.  I'll go now and reaim the history template at here and away from English Renaissance.  Thanks in advance for anything you can do -- this article will get big fast, and I'm hoping a lot of people think it worth contributing to. Jwrosenzweig 22:29, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent call Derek, and one I totally agree with.  I was merely copying over material that had been added to English Renaissance, and I'm afraid I didn't give it a good look before doing so.  I don't know much about the Scottish turmoil, though -- do you mind correcting that sentence and fleshing out a little better picture of Scotland? Jwrosenzweig 13:47, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: This article is almost entirely about England.  It also is mostly about the period before the Acts of Union 1707 which formed the Kingdom of Great Britain.  I think it would be best to start the article again, keeping the subject much more narrowly defined. PeterGrecian 18:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rethink the Article ? 

message: What is this "first British Empire"? There was only one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.147.84.17 (talk) 12:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The point being made here is that in the late 18thC the loss of the 13 American colonies forced Britain to turn its attention to Asia, Africa, and the Pacific. In other words, they started again. I am not sure we need this distinction here.--SabreBD (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Empire
Talk:Lovehatetragedy

message: Only the song code of energy is nu metal but the rest is post-hc/alt-metal and post-grunge!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.167.236.61 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-HC/Alt-Metal/Post-Grunge 

message: None of the two references to call this a Rap Metal album says specifically about Lovehatetragedy... Please change this, the only song in the album that have rapped vocals is She Loves Me Not, and it is only in the bridge. The album it's just Alternative Metal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiohsilva100 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rap Metal
Talk:Old Friends from Young Years

message: Does the citation tag still need to be here? The article looks like it uses footnotes, which seem perfectly clear to me. C628 (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Tag