lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rachel Hurst

message: I again reverted the complete rewrite by User:MuttleyJed.
* Cited material was replaced by unverifiable statements, as no sources were given. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
* Edit summary includes "the original was inaccurate and caused offence to the subject" which implies a connection to the article's subject. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
--Wire723 (talk) 10:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: An IP editor has continued making similar edits, and has repeatedly removed the medical condition that caused subject's wheelchair condition, despite its long standing in the article and multiple editors reverting that change. I have concern that said editor has a COI similar to the one stated above, and in any case they should join the talk page and seek consensus for that change. (I also disagree with the tag that's been placed on that information; if we under WP:BLPSPS accept self-written sources for non-controversial information about the subject published by the subject themselves, then we logically accept self-written sources with a respectable third-party publisher.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "better source needed" tag, which I added because I wasn't aware of that exception. --Wire723 (talk) 13:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting rewrite by a connected editor 

message: An IP editor is trying to edit war away a mention that Ms. Hurst was diagnosed with congenital myopathy, claiming it is somehow irrelevant. Given that her involvement in the disability field, the fact that she has a disability herself is quite relevant. The material is well source to the subject's own writings. I've found no sign that it's a controversial claim. The IP user is free to come to this talk page and try to find consensus that the material should not be included, but more than one editor has already undone their removal of it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Have done some tidying of the article. I don't have a strong view about the inclusion or exclusion of the particular type of disability, but don't think the article especially needs it - the fact of her disability and her using a wheelchair are the important bits related to her activism. Agree that users with a CoI should not edit the article. Tacyarg (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  congenital myopathy
Talk:Imperial Conference

message: Several articles (including HMAS Australia (1911), Naval Service Bill, and Australian White Ensign) refer to a 1909 Imperial Conference. Highlights of the conference include the proposal of naval "fleet units" that Britain wanted the Dominions to buy: they would be operated by the Dominions in peacetime, but be merged together under Royal Navy control in the event of war. The conference was also one of the stepping stones in the creation of the Australian and Canadian navies as (relatively) independent organisations, instead of 100% integrated subunits of the British Royal Navy. Can anyone shed some light on if this was an Imperial Conference not included in the article, of if it was a different beast altogether? Thanks in advance. -- saberwyn 03:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1909 conference? 

message: Was Southern Rhodesia really present in 1930? 1932 looks more likely and India was present in 1932 too. --Rumping (talk) 13:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Rhodesia 

message: The chair of the 1887 conference held in London (ie the first Colonial Conference) is listed here as Robert Gascoyne-Cecil. As Lord Salisbury, he was indeed Prime Minister in 1887 so assumed that this was likely to be correct. However the article 1887 Colonial Conference has in its infobox that Sir Henry Thurstan Holland, the then Secretary of State for the Colonies, was the chair of the conference, and this claim is repeated elsewhere in that article. The next two conferences held in London (1897 & 1902) were chaired by Joseph Chamberlain who was the then Secretary of State for the Colonies, which would lead me to to suspect that Holland might well have been the chairman in 1887. the confusion might be that Lord Salisbury gave the opening address at the 1887 conference. While I am leaning towards changing the entry for chair here to Holland, does anyone have a source which would confirm the issue either way? Dunarc (talk) 21:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Conference chair - conflict with another article
Talk:Rafael Pérez (police officer)

message: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is entirely unambiguous. It states clearly, without exception, that "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion". This isn't optional. Claims of crimes, pleas, convictions etc absolutely must be accompanied by full and complete reference to reliable sources that directly state what is being stated in the article. If people can't understand this, or are unwilling to comply, they have no business contributing to biographies at all. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hasn't anyone contributing to this article ever read the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy?
Talk:Rafik Khalifa

message: *
--Jetstreamer  01:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article 
Talk:Gitara Moroso

message: The first vote here, mine, is that I agree. The content of this page is barely a paragraph long. It shouldn't take a whole page on its own. Nor that it properly cites anything solid. Anthonydraco (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Yeah, redirect her over with the content (its the perfect length for that) to the Aes Sedai section of the main characters page. Or maybe the history one, for this case? rootology/equality 00:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Characters page would probably be more appropriate.  She is a character in New Spring, at least.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, is she? I still need to go back and read that one. :) rootology/equality 16:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now where do we move her to? Main character page? Minor character page? Which? I've never read New Spring, so I have no idea. Please vote. Anthonydraco (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is Wikipedia; we don't vote, we try to reach a consensus on a course of action through reasoned discussion.  That being said, because she appears as a character in New Spring instead of just as a historical figure, I think it would be most appropriate to merge her to the minor characters page.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 11:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm already aware of the policy. Vote is just another word to call you to voice your opinion before reaching consensus. It's just the shortest word. I'll wait for more opinions or until someone wants to move it. Anthonydraco (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Rajendra Mal Lodha

message: I find it extraordinary that Lodha committee doesn't exist and is hardly mentioned here and there is no mention of the recommendations on the Board of Control for Cricket in India page. What universe am I in? Whatsup editors? DadaNeem (talk) 21:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lodha committee?! 
Talk:Ralf Rangnick

message: Hi, I come from Vietnam where there are a lot of Man U's fan. I want to thank those who have written this article. Whereby, I might learn more about Rangnick. 
I have translated it into The wikipedia Vietnamese version.
Thanks very much.
2001:EE0:520E:6F10:759F:BB31:AB92:58DB (talk) 02:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi 

message: Hi, . Can you provide me either guidelines or something else about this? Sorry I really didn't know, I thought it should be separated by comma (formal writings). Thanks in advance and cheers, F.Yi. let's talk! 02:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The comma before the word "and" is only necessary when it removes ambiguity. There's no need for it otherwise. Thanks. – PeeJay 09:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary Oxford comma
Talk:Ralph S. Moore

message: Ralph S Moore has been included in the list of notable rose growers in this section. It's a start.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libby norman (talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link back to Garden Roses page
Talk:Ramón González (footballer, born 1974)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ramón González Expósito →  – WP:COMMONNAME is "Ramón González" or just "Ramón", doesn't use maternal surname professionally. Ortizesp (talk) 14:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 August 2020
Talk:Odeon

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Odeum. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 20#Odeum until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Odeum" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Harold Shea

message: There is a line under Collected Editions that says:
Wall of Serpents has also been issued under the title The Enchanter Completed (1980)
The title should be "The Enchanter Compleated".
http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?255073
Also, there is a link to The Enchanter Completed, which redirects to The Wall of Serpents page.  It's pointless to have a link for Wall of Serpents, and in the same line have a redirect link to the same page.68.97.202.187 (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. BPK (talk) 00:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall of Serpents - Enchanter Completed/Compleated 

message: I'm sure relaced is a typo, but for what? ϢereSpielChequers 19:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: relaced

message: :
See WP:REFERS.  Why not ? —Tamfang (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  the thing and its name
Talk:High House Chains

message: The Seven of the Dead Fires says "Analogous to the Magi, Captain or Hounds in other decks" but then two headings later it says that the House of Chains also has Magi. How can this be analogous to Magi if they already have Magi? Was there another position that should be listed there instead? --CortJstr (talk) 18:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked up Analogous and the definition is "being or related to", so it may just be saying that 'The Seven of Dead Fires' have a connection to the warrens...And...there is a magi, too.  However, I would check the back of The Bonehunters to see for sure. Krmarshall (talk) 01:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Randy Jackson (Zebra)

message: I'm just durdling around fixing up articles that only need minor tweaks - I've separated the first couple of sentences as they appear to be OK as the beginning of a lead for now, and put the rather large block of text underneath under "Career". The article still needs fixing up, but this should probably be left to someone more familiar with the material. I will remove the template for now - please feel free to replace it if anyone feels it's needed. MentlegenOh (talk) 03:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead created 
Talk:High House Death

message: what race was hood before he acended. his appearence offers no hints, (much like shodowthrone's appearence also doesn't suggest human). he was around at the time of the jaghut tyrans. raest talks of him fondly. which also suggests he wasn't Imass. but he couldn't have been Jaghut, as jaghut are imortal, and he was imortal. this should be covered, if we can find any info on it -Oxinabox (talk) 03:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it is theorized that Hood is Jaghut.  Krmarshall (talk) 04:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hood pre-ascendancy
Talk:Rauf Hassan

message: I put a Cleanup template on the page, because currently it is little more than a list of works, not very well formatted, so that it's not actually clear what they are and what their connexion with Rauf Hassan is.  Does anyone know anything about this man? Cheers, Lindsay 06:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Request 

message: I have tried, and failed to find any reliable sources to support this text.  I have posted a note asking for help at  WikiProject Kurdistan.  Hopefully, somone with better knowledge than me will swing by and either source the article or deal with it.  I did find a bio for actor Shero Rauf, who mentions that his father ...is one of the most famous writers in Kurdistan... (not really a reliable source) and nothing else.--Plad2 (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Horn of Valere

message: Based on the other items in the list the Horn of Valere would be a good fit.  The writing could be tightened up a bit and it wouldn't be much longer than the other entries.Tbennert (talk) 05:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Not sure why Items of the One Power shows in red above like it isn't an article?Tbennert (talk) 05:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article does exist
Talk:Ray Prins

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 23:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Ray William Clough

message: This biography fails to cite any sources.  In addition, the biographical sketch that made up most of the article was apparently an uncited direct copy & paste from .  I have removed the copied material, and encourage anyone who is interested in the topic to write a proper, original biographical treatment. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
Talk:Jordan Rally

message: I initialy started this page as Jordan Rally WRC for a couple of reasons. Firstly I thought that it would be a good idea to keep the page just for the WRC events that are held here, rather than having the Middle East Rally Championship as part of the same article as this may get confusing. Secondly, when looking at the 2008 WRC website it does say Jordan Rally WRC. Although on the official rally website it does call it Jordan Rally. Any thoughts on this would be appriciated.Cstubbies (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Prolog's edit summary explains it perfectly and I agree entirely, as would anyone else. But don't worry about it; just keep in mind the established naming conventions. Adrian M. H. 21:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Several sources do seem to call it "Jordan Rally WRC", but I don't think separate articles would serve the reader best. It's the same rally, after all, and pretty much every rally ever on the WRC schedule has been or is currently part of some other championship; national-level, ERC, IRC, et cetera. Prolog (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for such a quick response. That seems fine to me, just wanted to make sure we get it right thats all.Cstubbies (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name
Talk:Raymond Johansen

message: Surely this is incorrect. Norway doesn't have deputy ministers. The correct title must be secretary of state. __meco (talk) 10:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deputy foreign minister?

message: "Following scandal-like revelations in the spring of 2012 concerning Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, who has widely been seen as the most likely successor to party leader and prime minister Jens Stoltenberg, Johansen has been cited as a more likely candidate to succeed Stoltenberg"
this is outdated, as støre got the position  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.124.210.174 (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I rewrote a bit. We should update with his new position also, of course. Iselilja (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: party leader likelyhood
Talk:Free lunch

message: The TANSTAAFL article claims to be just about the acronym, but it attempts to cover the concept of a Free Lunch anyway. The two articles are not so far apart conceptually that they merit separate articles. A short section on the origin, a short section on the acronym, and then sections on the concept and the current-day use would suffice in one article, "Free lunch", or maybe "No free lunch". Classical geographer (talk) 13:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: The 1872 NY Times article mentioned in the text was actually published in 1875.  This is correct in the notes.  See http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9407EEDA133EE43BBC4851DFB466838E669FDE. [Sorry, just realized that the text discusses at least two different NY Times articles.]  The $0.15 in 1875 is about $2.30 now should be reworded to say precisely when—when is now?  My use of the inflation calculator gives a different result for 2009.   165.189.101.177 (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: There have recently been news stories about Chris Anderson of Wired using Wikipedia material without attribution in a book. Thanks to The Fat Man Who Never Came Back for calling my attention to the fact that this is one of the articles that was used. Details here. It's embarrassing to me that the use of Wikipedia was detected through Anderson's inclusion of errors of mine. The errors involved transcription of sources and the year of of one of the cited New York Times articles. These errors were corrected recently by User:Matt Ruff. 
My sloppiness didn't affect the accuracy of the article materially... and, fortunately, Wikipedia's requirements of source citation allowed others to find and fix my mistakes. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject of recent "copying without attribution" new story

message: In Philosophy, there is a pejorative reference to "The Universe" as a free lunch, because it has no cause, and was eternally existent. This would infer that although parts of the Universe are all scarce, the Universe itself is a free lunch. 129.180.147.130 (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Universe as a free lunch
Talk:Raynetta Mañees

message: This article popped up on my list of suggested edits, so I did some work to it today. However, there is still a long way to go. For starters, practically nothing at all is cited from anywhere. I'm not sure how to note articles that need work beyond the notices at the top, but this one definitely belongs on Wikipedia's collective to-do list. If anyone with editing experience stumbles across this, there is one citation commented into the article because I didn't know how to properly cite it. Halinaxus (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refurbishment
Talk:Reijo Mäki

message: It is weird that there is no article for the Vares series of films. Until then, this is the main article. The film/DVD info in the article is poorly presented and needs improvement. The summary info box at the bottom of the page is the best we have to go by currently?-71.174.188.32 (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vares series of films
Talk:Intercision

message: "The operation carried out on an adult is less traumatic, and Lyra realises that many of the staff at the Bolvangar facility have been through the process, becoming dull and lacking initiative."
Is the above statement correct? The bomb that is supposed to kill Lyra is triggered in this way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.171.29 (talk) 05:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: On adults

message: I made an error in prod-tagging this article; this fictional concept has attracted outside interest. The trick is to search Google with the single word Intercision in quotes to stop Google "helping" you with related terms. Abductive (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:CCCP Fedeli alla linea

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page not moved. There was no consensus for a move. (closed by non-admin page mover)  -- Dane talk  16:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: CCCP Fedeli alla linea →  – the correct spelling of the band’s name has got the hyphen (compare the page on it.wikipedia [it] and the website) EISaxo (talk) 12:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2023
Talk:René Laurentin

message: There is a misunderstanding in the article.  The title "L'Abbe" attributed to Fr. Laurentin, is the normal title for diocesan priests in France.   It is not the equivalent of the English word "abbot".   
The article does not indicate to which diocese Fr. Laurentin belongs. 
The article does not indicate sources for its information.  Chonak (talk) 06:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Andrade Lands

message: Hello Colin Gleen! Welcome once more. I have a question. Can you tell me, please, why did you use the coat of arms of Bretagne for the template of Andrade Lands? Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that is a hard one. Because the lands of the Andrades in the 14th century included Britonia (see this external link: Britonia) and Bretagne/Brittany are supposed to have the same roots. What do you think? --Colin Gleen (talk) 12:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply Colin. But I believe that is not a suficient reason (the same roots for the names). Why not the Andrade coat of arms (see below)? Several Galician and Poruguese genealogical sites (I just googled it) say that's the one the counts used (the first at least). By the way, you may that a look at some copy edit I did in your reply - it's just some tricks one learns along the way! Oh! And generally one replies in the other editor's talk page, but no problem. Thanks a lot for the info on Britonia (I just edit a bit, also on Mailoc) - I did knew there had been some Romano-Britons who settled in Galicia, but I didn't know any specifics. I am going to try and place the Andradade coa in the template, you think it's not good, feel free to change, but I do believe that the one from Brittany is not a good choice (it pertains to a specific French tradition, whereas Iberian traditions are very different). Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 13:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question