Talk:Madinat al-Zahra

message: I've revised a bit the style, which was fitting more a magazine than an encyclopedia, and removed some POV, as well as the use of "miles" for articles in countries where such out of date units are not used. --Attilios (talk) 13:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: That should read 112 hectares in the intro - not sites.   Del puerto (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: del puerto

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Medina Azahara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130114050050/http://www.artencordoba.co.uk/MADINAT-AL-ZAHRA/Index.html to http://www.artencordoba.co.uk/MADINAT-AL-ZAHRA/Index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728023720/http://www.qatarvisitor.com/index.php?cID=412&pID=1684 to http://www.qatarvisitor.com/index.php?cID=412&pID=1684
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: You cannot say Madinat al Zahra is « morrish ». Morrish is a reference to North Africa, when Al Zahra construction of Al Andalus (surprising !). 
The first main problem is a political one : Alzahara has been constructed to show the new Caliph power, in Cordoba. That was a power show, against the rest of the world, against Bagadad, against Constantinople. It has been done by one of the most powerful cities of the world, but that mean a big political break down with other muslins territories. In 930 Berbers were a threat against Al Andalus, not an influence spring.
Another problem is the influence way : Alzahra received several influences, firsts from Middle Est, Constantinople, Visigoth and it has intensively reused Roman material from Cordoba for political purposes (I, the Caliph, represents the continuity of power from the Roman empire...). It has influenced posteriors constructions in North Africa, but during the beginning of the 10th centuries there is no example of such construction in north Africa, mainly because after the Arab conquest, theses territories are not yet sufficiently pacified to do so (Think there is another new fatimid Caliphate). Alzahra and Cordoba mesquite has originated a big influence in north Africa but when it has been constructed he has few influences from North Africa ; then it is not « Morrish », it is  « Andalus ». That is just the way North African people name the North African buildings constructed with Cordoban (and latter, sevillan by the 11 century...) models in mind. 
Posteriors influences can be more complexes. v_atekor (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morish 

message: Just saying this here as a heads-up and also as a space for other editors to give feedback or raise problems: I'm going to try to revise parts of the article with additional sources (and some of the same, such as Triano 2007). There are still quite a lot of passages without citations, so in these cases I will take the liberty to rewrite them if needed. I'll make additional notes here in the future if they seem helpful. Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 19:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Initial note about citations: I'm used to using the normal citation template provided by the visual editor, but the current page uses the sfn format for Triano 2007. I've simply used what was easiest to me while I'm writing so that I can focus on content, but I'll aim to come back later and convert things to a more consistent format (unless someone else beats me to it). R Prazeres (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

text: I've added a greatly expanded descriptive section which covers most of the major documented structures. Just a heads-up that I've relied heavily but not exclusively on Arnold's 2018 book, as it's by far the most detailed English-language source I've seen, it's recent, it summarizes other research up to now, and it's cited by other authors like Jonathan Bloom (in his recent 2020 book), so it's a reasonably authoritative and very useful source for this purpose. I've also added some plans based on the plans published in both of these sources; they're not works of art, they're just designed to give some visual and spatial sense to the description of the site, in the absence of professional plans that can be uploaded to Commons. R Prazeres (talk) 01:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

text: PS: I should add that if anyone wants to improve the city plan images, or has simple improvements to suggest, feel free to do so. I can even provide you with the maps from the scholarly sources if you want to work on a better version yourself. R Prazeres (talk) 05:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  General revisions (May 2021) 

message: Not a major issue for this topic, but I just read one author explicitly clarify that there were two "Ja'far"s under al-Hakam II, and it's not entirely clear which of them would have been the one associated with the House of Ja'far in Madinat al-Zahra, or if indeed if archeologists themselves are clear about which one. The short story for editing here is: I've revised the wording on the page to keep the name non-specific for now. Maybe this can be clarified in the future, or maybe it won't, but I'm leaving my notes here in case it's of interest later.
One Ja'far (al-Siqlabi) was a eunuch slave, and according to Brian Catlos occupied the post first, while the other Ja'far (al-Mushafi) was a member of a prominent family from Valencia. Al-Mushafi is mentioned by historians as one of the most prominent figures of his time (in part due to his relationship to al-Mansur). It sounds like the first one is the relevant figure for Madinat al-Zahra, especially if we trust Vallejo Triano, but Arnold refers to the second one. None of the sources mention the other Ja'far either way, so it feels too vague to say with confidence that it's one and not the other. For reference, here are the relevant passages from the sources I found, starting with the identification of two separate "Ja'far"s by Brian Catlos:
* Catlos (2018), "Kingdoms of Faith: A New History of Islamic Spain", page 148: "The office [of hajib] would not be revived until the reign of al-Hakam II, who appointed his slave Ja'far al-Siqlabi to the post, and subsequently -- with fatal consequences -- Ja'far al-Mushafi, a member of a long-settled, well-established, and integrated Berber family that had gained influence under Umayyad patronage."
You can find multiple mentions of Ja'far al-Mushafi by other historians due to his political importance, but by contrast they don't mention Ja'far al-Siqlabi as his predecessor. For example:
*Hugh Kennedy (1996), "Muslim Spain and Portugal: A Political History of al-Andalus", on page 101: 
*Pierre Guichard (1998, 2016) in "The Formation of al-Andalus, Part 1: History and Society" (edited by Manuela Marin), page 175-176: 
And here are the sources I've found that talk about Ja'far explicitly in relation to Madinat al-Zahra (note also that Anderson also cites Vallejo Triano on this topic):
* Antonio Vallejo Triano (2007), "Madinat Al-Zahra; Transformation of a Caliphal City", page 16: 
* Glaire D. Anderson (2013), "The Islamic Villa in Early Medieval Iberia: Architecture and Court Culture in Umayyad Cordoba", page 34-35: 
* Felix Arnold (2017), "Islamic Palace Architecture in the Western Mediterranean: A History", page 98: 
Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes and question on the identity of "Ja'far"

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Medina Azahara →  – After reviewing a lot of sources during the expansion of this page, I think it would be good to have editors reconsider the exact page title. In particular, the current page title Medina Azahara is the common Spanish name of the site, but the common rendition Madinat al-Zahra is probably preferable for the following reasons:
1) The archeological site's official name, even in Spanish, is Madinat al-Zahra, as seen on its official site.
2) "Madinat al-Zahra" reflects standard Arabic romanization, at least in English. It therefore also reflects the historical Arabic name more accurately for English readers. Whereas using the Spanish rendition of it here is arguably a little confusing or anachronistic, especially when discussing the city's history, since the city was built and destroyed long before the region became Spain (unlike, by contrast, the Alhambra, which has a long history after 1492 under that exact name in both Spanish and English).
3) More importantly, the majority of accessible English-language reliable sources (i.e. sources by scholars, museum catalogues, etc) clearly seem to use "Madinat al-Zahra", and usage in such sources is the primary criteria cited by WP:COMMONNAME. Here are examples, including some major authoritative sources: 
* Publications by Antonio Vallejo Triano (the lead archeologist of the site between 1985 and 2013) in English books in 1992 (available here) and in 2007 (preview here), as well as in his Spanish publications (e.g. 1995, "Madīnāt al-Zahrā’. El Salón de Abd al-Raḥmān III" and 2010, "La ciudad califal de Madīnat al-Zahrā’. Arqueología de su excavación").
* The official guidebook of the site (also written or edited by Vallejo Triano) published in 2005, "Madinat Al-Zahra: Official Guide to the Archeological Complex" (Google Books page here)
* Jonathan Bloom's recent (2020) English-language introduction to the history of Islamic architecture in the region: "Architecture of the Islamic West: North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula, 700-1800" (preview here; see page 51 and after)
* Barrucand and Bednorz's introduction on Moorish architecture in Spain: 1992, "Moorish Architecture in Andalusia" (pdf available here, see page 61).
* Publications by D. Fairchild Ruggles , a well-known author on the history of Islamic gardens: see 2000, "Gardens, Landscape, and Vision in the Palaces of Islamic Spain" (preview here, see page 53 or after) and 2011, "Islamic Gardens and Landscapes" (preview here, see around pages 18, 45, or 152)
* The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture, published by Oxford, relevant entry here
* Encyclopedia Britannica entry
* Encyclopedia of Islam (Third edition), published by Brill, in multiple entries such as this one
* Museum With No Frontiers, relevant page here
* Felix Arnold's overview of western Islamic palaces, although it's more technical and uses the narrower Arabic transliteration "az-Zahra" instead of "al-Zahra": 2018, "Islamic Palace Architecture in the Western Mediterranean: A History" (Google preview here, see page 60)
To be clear, "Medina Azahara" is still used in a fair amount of tourism information (e.g. 1 or 2) and it is used in its UNESCO designation, so I am not opposed to keeping it as is, but it does seem like the weight of reliable sources (and the site's official name) is more consistent with both WP:COMMONNAME and WP:USEENGLISH.
Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 22:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 May 2021