Talk:Samhan

message: CHaracter 韓 meaning great???
it means just Korea!
and in older times in China this character had meaning of some device to make stuff with water!
look at definition at zhongwen com
Note that the first character in "英國" has a meaning that has something to do with flowers and being distinguished. However, "England" does not mean "land of flowers" or "land of distinction" in English. I guess Britishers should just be glad that the Chinese did not choose to transliterate England using the "ying" that means "zero" so that we'd end up with "ying guo" meaning "land of zero" or "land of nothing"!
The explanation given in this article for the etymology of "han" suggests that "Han" is related to the word "Khan" (Qaan in Mongolian language). It might not be the right explanation, but it assumes (perhaps erroneously) that the word "han" which later came to mean and designate "Korea" was not originally of Chinese origin.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metonyme (talk • contribs) 10:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

message: This article gives no dates for Samhan's foundation, it's leaders, or its decline. How can anyone get an idea of what years the Samhan existed without actual dates (or at the very least, circa, like circa 100BC.?) Thomas Lessman 20:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates for Samhan?

message: The location of Yamatai is not exactly clear, Kyūshū is just one theory, the other one locating Yamatai (Yama'ichi) in Kinai (Honshū).
24 April 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.147.73.55 (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Yamatai in Kyūshū?

message: Has this article been vandalized, what does three delicious hams mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.Cozzys (talk • contribs) 16:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it has been vandalized. I reverted the change. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Three delicious Hams(??)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Samhan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722141342/http://www.mosan.or.kr/book/2/14.pdf to http://www.mosan.or.kr/book/2/14.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050530105415/http://www.ekoreajournal.net/archive/detail.jsp?VOLUMENO=14&BOOKNUM=6&PAPERNUM=1 to http://www.ekoreajournal.net/archive/detail.jsp?VOLUMENO=14&BOOKNUM=6&PAPERNUM=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050530102744/http://www.ekoreajournal.net/archive/detail.jsp?VOLUMENO=41&BOOKNUM=4&PAPERNUM=11 to http://www.ekoreajournal.net/archive/detail.jsp?VOLUMENO=41&BOOKNUM=4&PAPERNUM=11
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This entire article is based on a single Chinese source? The foundations of this great country need to be a precise as possible. We cannot allow a lackluster approach to presentation of Korea's origins. How can we know if areas of occupation are disputed if we do not know by whom they are disputed? 
First and second hand accounts are required to inform the reader of production capabilities in the villages. Sources referenced in the bottom should be added to the notes section providing a link to an abstract on a database such as EBSCOHost. In the legacy section, we are unclear as to which historians are being discussed. 
121.66.26.219 (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genuine Lack of Sources