lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Cleanup-spam

message: I was messing around with some different formatting for the template because I didn't like the line breaks in the current version. Users' screen resolutions totally skipped my mind though, and I found the current version actually looks a lot better with a smaller screen, while this version looks better with a larger one. Still I thought I'd throw this up here anyway. 
To comply with Wikipedia:External links, this article or section may require cleanup.
This article or section may contain spam – links added to promote a website, product or service – that should be removed.If you are familiar with the content of the external links, please help by removing commercial links, or discuss the issue on the talk page.Category:Wikipedia spam cleanup
Mrtea (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Hi, I've started the documentation in the Template:Cleanup-spam/doc subpage, as recommended in Wikipedia:Template doc page pattern. Please edit the template to:


	This article or section may contain spam.Wikipedia spam consists of external links mainly intended to promote a website.  Wikipedia spam also consists of external links to websites which primarily exist to sell goods or services, use objectionable amounts of advertising, or require payment to view the relevant content. If you are familiar with the content of the external links, please help by removing promotional links in accordance with Wikipedia:External links. (You can help!)

Category:Wikipedia spam cleanup




Thanks.  05:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --CBD 12:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved documentation

message: Please replace the snippet
This article or section may contain
with the standard
This article or section may contain
This way, we can make specific calls such as  or , and else the template defaults to its current display. Thanks. — Komusou talk @ 22:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Add <<<1|article or section>>> param

message: Add the date by replacing template with:
Category:Wikipedia spam cleanup



Also, take a look at the section above and perhaps do that, too. Gary King (talk) 01:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: both. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: Minor fix. The date should be small. Replace the following:
)</small>
With:
)
Gary King (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small date 

message: Requesting sync with the new sandbox to bring this in line with other cleanup templates. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandbox edits
Talk:United States v. Ball

message: This case is listed as "United States v. Ball" on LexisNexis, and listed as "Ball v. U.S." on Findlaw.  I'm not sure which is correct.  One thing is for sure though, this article needs to be rewritten.  --Eastlaw 19:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case name?? 

message: Whoever wrote it pasted the entirety of the majority opinion in the article!  The entire thing doesn't need to be here, that's what FindLaw is for (and a very good service, too).
As for whether or not the issue raised is relevant ... it seems relevant enough, seeing as how it involves voiding of convictions based on faulty indictments.
--ThatBajoranGuy 09:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know why it's so long ... 

message: At start class, does not meet standards of B Class as written. Fails B1 - not suitably referenced, B2 - is a verbatim copy of the opinion, B3 - no defined structure, B4/5/6 - see B2.  Needs considerable work, which I will try to do as I get a chance.  GregJackP Boomer!  17:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessed
Talk:Battery eliminator

message: no mention yet of the core fact that a battery elmiinator is a power supply.
Tabby (talk) 03:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power supply 

message: The "Principle of Working" doesn't explain how it works at all. Landroo (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Confusing
Talk:Atomic electron configuration table

message: †I changed it to 7s25f146d07p1. Wd930PeriodicTable (Talk) (talk) 04:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I changed Lawrencium [[Lawrencium|(103)]] to 7s<sup>2</sup>5f<sup>14</sup>7p<sup>1</sup>
Talk:Mesh analysis

message: I have been editing this article and trying to make it better.  Is there information that I am missing or am I including too much information?  Does the structure of the article make sense.  Is there anyway that I can make the article better?  Any input would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks!   Mrball25 (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest the most glaring omissions are the history of the method.  Who invented it, when, why, what were they trying to solve, how does it fit in the development of network analysis in general - what came before, what came after.  An indication of its practical use would also help. SpinningSpark 17:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing article 

message: I am new a Wikipedia and want this article to be complete and up to the standards of Wikipedia.  Is there information that I am missing or am I including too much information?  Does the structure of the article make sense.  Is there anyway that I can make the article better?
:RfCs aren't really set up for review, I'll submit this to our peer-review system instead. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for peer-review

message: I have reverted a recent edit which removed the reference to loop analysis.  Works I have read which even bother to distinguish the two would have it that loop analysis is a less rigid procedure than mesh analysis.  That is, it is similar, but the loops do not have to be essential meshes and one is consequently not guaranteed to have a minimised set of equations.  On the other hand, I believe some authors treat the two terms as equivalent.  Loop analysis redirects here so it is right that the article refers to it.  Either the two terms should be disambiguated here in this article as necessary or else create a new article for loop analysis altogether. SpinningSpark 17:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loop analysis
Talk:Alan Tonks

message: In one of your articles about Alan Tonks, it states that 'Alan Tonks is the son of the LATE Chris Tonks.'  This information is inaccurate.  Chris Tonks, Alan's Father, is very much alive and currently resides in Toronto. [unsigned]
But in February of 2006, Chris Tonks Sr did in fact die.  There is, for example, a memorial statement by Mayor Miller on the city of Toronto website.  [unsigned]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.92.118 (talk) 02:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wayne Primeau

message: My friend is the nephew of Mr. Primeau. He might have some pictures of him. Would it be okay if I uploaded those? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shindo9Hikaru (talk • contribs) 03:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My friend 

message: Is this guy related to Joe Primeau? ---- Seth781  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seth781 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is This Guy Related To Joe
Talk:Emergy synthesis

message: My name is Elliott Campbell and I am a graduate student at the Center for Environmental Policy at Univ. of Florida. I have found errors in both this page and the emergy page and would like to correct them. I will be doing most of the edits under the guidance of Dr. Mark Brown. We all greatly appreciate the effort that Dr. Maud has put into writing this page but are concerned that some of the errors will negatively effect the perception of emergy. While all of the philosophical implications of emergy can be made, in practice emergy is grounded in thermodynamic reality and has a myriad of practical applications and its acceptance by the scientific community at large is growing rapidly. 
thank you
Hello Elliott. Please sign your entries - this gives an automatic date. The usual way of editing a Wikipedia article is to discuss the content of concern in the discussion section first before making any major changes. Sholto Maud 12:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Please edit the objectionable content and place it here for discussion. Sholto Maud 03:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: I added the NPOV tag because significant criticisms of the concept of emergy synthesis and the entire field that produced it are not reported in the article. See Talk:Emergy#Neutrality. Flying Jazz (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Kent Baer

message: I have copied the first paragraph of the article that started as a copyvio (and still had substantial copyvio) to Kent Baer/Temp. — Fingers-of-Pyrex 03:45, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Once Colorado adds Baer to the official coaching staff page then this page may title him as DC of Colorado. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 01:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Colorado move 
Talk:The Generality Problem for reliabilism

message: This was a very poorly written entry: words were used improperly, sentences were garbled, and information was inaccurate. I have deleted it until a better entry can be written.
:Okay, I redirected it to Reliabilism for now, and if someone wants to come up with a complete entry on it they are certainly free to do so.  The article on reliabilism had a more complete and intelligible treatment of the topic than what was here, anyway. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 04:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bradley University

message: Dear Writer, 
I would love to see subtopics about activities, greek life, sports, and more on this page. Information about the residential buildings would be helpful to incoming students. Adding information about the new president would be very helpful to illustrate the current goals of the university. 
[User: AK302217] 8, February, 2023  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak302217 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Material

message: This section is unusual for an article about big universities. The contents are completely unreferenced and since it is just a rote list of various societies without any further detail, I question whether there is any useful information being shared here. I propose deletion. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 18:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has chimed in on this question, I will go ahead and make some cuts. --Melchior2006 (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek life and honor societies
Talk:Transformity

message: * I believe that this is an accurate statement of the energy transformation ratio with appropriate citations. If an expert in the field belives that this is not accurate then they are welcome to correct my interpretation Sholto Maud 06:09, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be accurate or not. The problem is that all these words (emergy, transformity, etc.) have been used by a handfull of people, albeit well cited and referenced, and to a good purpose. This is why alot of people view them as OR. 81.219.225.4 16:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NOR

message: I added the NPOV tag because significant criticisms of the concept of transformity and the entire field that produced it are not reported in the article. See Talk:Emergy#Neutrality. Flying Jazz (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:American Wrestling Federation

message: I don't think that the championship of a very short-lived professional wrestling league is deserving of its own article.  Please discuss.  Tom Lillis 03:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I have heard and seen on some articles like the Barry Darsow article that the AWF is refered to as Tito Santana's promotion, but I have yet to see any references or citations stating this fact.  Can we dispell this once and for all?  Mr. C.C. (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tito Santana was promoted as the on-air owner of the promotion. He did an on-air interview for the first recorded broadcast putting over this face. Kamnet (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being Referred To A Tito Santana's Promotion 

message: WP:N is not established in the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  03:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 

message: AWF is back in Minnesota, owned by Mick Karch.  Can someone who knows more get this updated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.103.170.111 (talk) 23:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other AWF
Talk:Aztec use of entheogens

message: "cacahua-xochitl" is translated as "chocolate mushrooms" - is "xochitl" not flowers? The article previously establishes the nahum word for mushrooms as "nanácatl" 2601:187:100:BFA0:3054:1A48:6991:3B5F (talk) 15:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "xochitl" is definitely flower! and yes, mushroom is "nanacatl". btw, while we're at it, the language is called "Nahuatl". Jergas (talk) 01:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction / Mistranslation? 

message: Why is this article illustrated with a picture of Teotihuacan? That is problematic, as Teotihuacan was most definitely not a Mexica (Aztec) city! Granted, they found it in ruins and adopted it, and it was important to them, as they identified themselves as descendants of the founders, but it was founded over a thousand years before the Mexica arrived in the area. Jergas (talk) 01:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture of Teotihuacan
Talk:West Essex High School

message: Why is it "The West Essex High School" now? I'm removing this, it can't be right.
Also, I'm considering changing the whole name of the article, because the correct name seems to be "West Essex Senior High School". http://westex.org/ or email Scott McDonald (fastest awp in North America) he can't hold A.
--Aleron235 19:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "The"
Talk:Michael Biehn

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly sourced per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:BLP, WP:CS, WP:IRS, etc. Nightscream (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: Michael Biehn is also an voice actor for main charachter Sergant Rex Colt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.131.212.193 (talk) 10:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon
Talk:Scatterometer

message: Perhaps some expansion can be made from http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~bourassa/scat_html/What_is_Scat.shtml ? --AySz88^-^ 04:04, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding

message: §  Optical  says
: Lateral scattering by the air along the light beam is quantified as an attenuation coefficient. Any departure from the clear air extinction coefficient (e.g. in fog) is measured and is proportional to the visibility. 
# What's the difference, if any, between attenuation coefficient and extinction coefficient? 
# The wording of the second sentence means that the greater the departure from clear air, the greater the extinction coefficient, which increases in proportion to visibility. In other words, the less clear the air is, the better the visibility. That sure looks backwards: it should probably say "inversely proportional".
--Thnidu (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Extinction coefficient and attenuation coefficient are the same in meteorology. You are right about the wording, I changed it to be clearer. Pierre cb (talk) 12:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology; reversed meaning? 

message: it's a notable concept. fgnievinski (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose That would leave this already small article with even less than it already has. NoahTalk 09:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split radar
Category talk:Graphics chips

message: Not a bad idea, this category. But we probably need to decide how we define a "graphics chip" in relation to the already categorized graphics cards---the latter category actually contains modern (3D) GPUs rather than cards as such, which is admittedly more of a problem with the definition of *that* category rather than this one. :-)  Anyway, I guess we should be careful not to include any modern GPUs here; at least until we get the gfx chip/card/GPU relations sorted out. --Wernher 04:06, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea to have this category. I think it is good for there to be a separate category with old ‘graphics chips’ as opposed to modern-day GPUs. Take a look at the Video Display Processor article, I added some prose which explains what –I think that– the difference between VDPs and GPUs is... That a good enough definition? In any case, there should be a ‘Graphics chip’ article to accompany this category, and it should contain a clear definition of what is a graphic chip, and what not (modern GPUs). I vote for re-instating the graphics chip article. Grauw 09:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Graphics chips vs. graphics cards

message: The contents of this category has been moved to :Category:Graphics processing units, despite the fact that most of the devices discussed in those articles are not Graphics processing units at all, they are simple graphics chips. For example all of the MOS Technology devices. I would suggest to completely revert to the situation as it was.
Ronaldvd (talk) 15:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Graphics processing units
Talk:Melissa Brown (politician)

message: This article is up for AfD at this writing, but is clearly going to be kept.  So I'm taking the liberty of expanding it a bit while its still fresh in my mind. Herostratus 04:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:1904 Great August Gale

message: This was not a tropical cyclone. None formed in August of 1904 according to UNISYS. There is probably a reason it's called the Great August Gale and not the Great August Hurricane. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 13:59, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tropical Cyclone?

message: Doing a google search turns up no references to a Great August Gale in Canada in 1904, or any combination thereof, except on wikipedia and its mirrors.  The monthly weather review for 1904 doesn't mention anything.  Additionally, the entire text of this article was written by an anonymous who has basically no other contributions. I conclude that this article is misinformation.  What should be done with it then? — jdorje (talk) 03:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Did this event even exist?
Talk:Financial analyst

message: Is there a good explanation for that blurb about equity, in the intro?
Secretagentwang 14:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I deleted it.--JKeene (talk) 22:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Equity

message: "Research analyst" redirects here? Why? It's not necessarily tied into finance.
Eric (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that kind of irked me as well. --Birdlivez (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects
Talk:Hachirō Arita

message: I get the feeling that one person has taken upon himself to start to change if not mess with the list of governer generals of korea, im going edit this page and try to clean it up. if this continues then im going to post this to the admins and get this pages locked or put under watch. Andrew Chung 14:16, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Somethings not entirely right here...

message: I decided to remove the following paragraph;
He was an important Japanese military strategist, and a Kodoha party member. Arita was a convinced supporter of the Axis Powers alliance and your political and military collaboration with them. He engineered a pact with the Axis powers, against the USSR.
The "Greater Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere" concept is also considered his brainchild. He was known in the Tokyo Club group (for active and retired politicians), with Kichisaburo Nomura, another foreign minister, Renzo Sawada, ex-ambassador to France, Juji Kasai, member of the Representatives Chamber, and Count Aisuke Kabayama member of the Chamber of Peers.
There is no references put on page confirming this so until someone can put references or properly do research into this it will remain here untill then. If anyone has a issue or problem please do feel free to mail me. Andrew Chung 14:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That assertion comes from the article itself, Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. --Steve, Sm8900 22:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ok decided to clean this page up
Talk:Mohini-leela

message: The article has been restored.  Please add any aspects of Mohini-leela missing.
The article must be deleted. It contains no new information, as against Mohini.
:—Karthik.raman 03:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be reoved/merged with the mohini article.
Sfacets 00:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jim E. Mora

message: The Colts were 4-6 in 2001 when Mora went off on his "Playoffs?" quote, not 6-7.  In fact, he won two more games that year to finish 6-10.  See http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/scorecard/08/05/interviews/ and http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt2001.htm. 71.114.72.21 05:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it entirely clear that the most common method of disambiguation between father and son is their initials? Or is this more a matter of wiki naming conventions? When both were active NFL figures, I never heard them disambiguated by their initials, and the usage of "Sr." and "Jr." with them was quite common. I'll try to dig up some sources. Don't fall asleep zzzzzz 21:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle initial 
Talk:Herbert Covington Bonner

message: the information on this page is very confusing and inaccurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbsrock (talk • contribs) 05:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Studio

message: Is there any reason this article shouldn't be mostly axed and replaced by a simply disambiguation page conforming to MoS:DP? Tedernst 05:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it isn't a disambiguation page, there is no ambiguity to solve, rather it is following Wikipedia:Summary style.  For other examples see Time.  All the topics on this page are related, it serves readers looking to explore the subject.  Since all forms of studio grew from the same root it makes no sense, to me, to disambiguate.  Is there any reason a reader would come here and be confused or not find what they were looking for?  Is there any ambiguity?  I agree the article could be better written, but I don't think that is best served by slashing the text away. Hiding  talk 08:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's a reason.  I thought there must be one that I simply wasn't seeing.  The abiguity I was seeing (and still am) was between the different types of studions, that mostly have their own articles.  No worries.  I'll drop it here.  Tedernst 08:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig?

message: Hi all, I've edited the mastering studio section to clear up a bit of mis info about audio mastering and to clearly differentiate between audio and video mastering. Would the studio http://www.platinum-mastering.com be suitable as an example? Maybe we could include a video example as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.248.60 (talk) 11:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mastering Studio 

message: Safalta pane ke liye 103.118.116.227 (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safalta pane ke liye