Talk:AllPeers

message: "After P2P software and instant messaging, it's internet browsers' turn to allow content sharing." This is totally a personal opinion.
The article should be completely cleaned up. --71.163.74.162 01:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally Unprofessional 

message: Marked as stub. Needs WAY more content. --ALIENDUDE5300 23:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: Added Links to Other Articles on Wikipedia. ALIENDUDE5300 02:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: i removed a ton of cruft and ad-like prose (like linking allpeers to its website at every mention of the word 'AllPeers'). trimmed the linkfarm at the end in accordance with WP:EL. also not that wikipedia is not a blog - we don't need the blow by blow for each version featurette. it now reads like an article instead of a product-push. JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 07:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cruft/ad-like-prose 

message: Note that the "screenshot" is actually a capture of our website. What's more, it's a page from our private beta that doesn't exist anymore. I'll try to get someone here to deal with it. comment added by 80.95.104.81 ( attributed by Widefox 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot is not a screenshot 

message: I noticed the re-added the Future Development Section; I removed it because of WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until these things are added they should stay out of an article. JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 22:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Development Section 

message: Many problems - mostly fixed....
I'm concerned about WP:COI, WP:NPOV
* User:ALIENDUDE5300 - do you have an affiliation with AllPeers? 
* 80.95.104.81 please sign your comments  here, as per guidelines, preferably by logging in to aid discussion.
inetnum:      80.95.104.80 - 80.95.104.83
netname:      BN-JANODVARKO-NET
descr:        Jan Odvarko
descr:        Praha
descr:        Czech Republic
I would be much happier if those affiliated to AllPeers signin and let it be known of the potential conflict.
I added back the Firefox TOC - please do not remove - it allows navigation, and is on all Firefox extensions. The problem with layout is fixed. The main problem is the article - it is a stub. It is also an advert, without a single reference. Closed source proprietary is not Free Software - removed. The image was not a screenshot - commented out until a real screenshot is put in. Widefox 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  many fixes 

message: Note that as of today, AllPeers is open source (see http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/03/07/allpeers-goes-open-source/ for more information).
:Only the client extension is open source, not. The servers remain closed source. "Note, however, that we are only opening up the client side of our product. Our various server-side modules will remain closed source since our network depends on having a single, stable instance of this servers."  http://developer.allpeers.com/ 80.47.209.198 20:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct... sorry, should have been explicit about that. BTW: The text is now inconsistent since it says "open source" in the first sentence but then "Even though it is closed source..." in the second paragraph. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plasticmillion (talk • contribs) 09:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Source 

message: I removed the {p2pclient} template but maybe some could add this to Comparison_of_file_sharing_applications. But form this article is am not sure if this is a anonymous application (like freenet) or just bittorrent with Protocol obfuscation (not anonymous) :Leuk he 09:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed p2p client template 

message: Note that we released version 0.70 a few weeks ago, and in fact version 0.70.1 came out last week. The big news is that the software now adds support for standard BitTorrent downloads to Firefox. This makes downloading BitTorrent files as easy as downloading normal files from the web (sorry, I sound like a marketing guy, but this is the discussion page after all). Here's a good up-to-date reference: http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3699316  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.95.104.81 (talk) 11:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 0.70.x and Firefox support