Talk:Aleppo

message: User talk:66.214.143.69, User talk:198.228.216.17, User talk:166.137.210.22 and User talk:198.228.216.46 I asked you several times to have a discussion, please contribute and give a reason for putting Armenians link even after linking Armani to its article, also please refrain from adding Armenian to Mitanni, the consensus is that mitanni wasn't an Armenian state, the citation you are giving was discussed in the Mitanni Talk page Talk:Mitanni#Regarding Petrie source in Historical Context and it was considered a mere conclusion not a fact, so you cant call Mitanni an Armenian-Hurrian kingdom--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 21:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Armani + Mitanni

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Aleppo]] 

message: Not a mention of John Cantlie and the ISIS videos, no mention of kidnap and torture and recent beheading and evidence of past ISIS crimes here, why? 
ISIS presence 
recent beheading 
Swedish nationals prosecuted
--Pennine rambler (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISIS 

message: I see nothing in this about the fact that aleppo is currently literally burning.184.60.31.237 (talk) 01:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  out of date? 

message: Events such as bombing or airstrikes is happening too frequently to be included in this article. The section "Syrian Civil War" should only include events such as large-scale military operations or other events that may be recorded in the city's history. My opinion is that the paragraph of Russia bombing a hospital should be removed, as bombing of hospitals is reported every month. Detailed news also makes the article biased. Esiymbro (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many details 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Aleppo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315181143/http://www.panoramaline.com/aleppo-arab.htm to http://www.panoramaline.com/aleppo-arab.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aleppo-cic.sy/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbssyr.org/new%20web%20site/General_census/census_2004/NH/TAB02-1-2004.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article lists Aleppo with a population of 2.1 million, an area of 190km^2, and a density of 210 per sqkm. One of these numbers is massively off, and given the metro population is listed at 2.1 million as well, perhaps the actual city's population is unknown? Rip-Saw (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no ISIS in Aleppo.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not in general true at all times (e. g. not even in 2016 when the above comment was made). You'd have to distinguish it by time/year, and attribute fighting groups accurately, in order to make such a generic yes/no statement. 2A02:8388:1600:A200:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 14:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population/density aren't accurate 

message: Having been reverted a second time without explanation, this time by , I'm wondering (1) why and (2) how they reconcile their position with MOS:EMBED. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 03:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Aleppo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304011949/http://www.worldheritagesite.org/sites/aleppo.html to http://www.worldheritagesite.org/sites/aleppo.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020104335/http://www.catholicnews.sg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2746&Itemid=120 to http://www.catholicnews.sg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2746&Itemid=120
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421234007/http://www.isalep.com:80/cuisine-aleppo/?p=1362 to http://www.isalep.com/cuisine-aleppo/?p=1362
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826235621/http://www.ursoap.com:80/pages/history_page.htm to http://www.ursoap.com/pages/history_page.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.gaziantepkultursanat.org/gaziantep/kardes_sehirleri/halep.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100219021807/http://jamahir.alwehda.gov.sy:80/_View_news2.asp?FileName=103164560320100127234904 to http://jamahir.alwehda.gov.sy/_View_news2.asp?FileName=103164560320100127234904
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Timeliness tag added due to many of the cultural/social facts stated as if they are still currently true (eg. Aleppo is a quickly growing city, there's lots of construction currently happening...). With current destruction it's difficult to keep up with particulars, but clearly Aleppo has fundamentally changed in the last few years. Other, more knowledgeable, editors would be useful here. Sweet kate (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know the pictures are outdated so they should be replaced by current ones.Xx236 (talk) 07:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Aleppo is the most populous city in Syria, with a population of 2,132,100 - rather was.Xx236 (talk) 07:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeliness 

message: There are contradictions between the figures relating to denominations in the text and the graph.
--Muzyk98 (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Aleppo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120520173518/http://www.cbssyr.org/new%20web%20site/General_census/census_2004/NH/TAB02-1-2004.htm to http://www.cbssyr.org/new%20web%20site/General_census/census_2004/NH/TAB02-1-2004.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728012354/http://www.travelnut.me/aleppo to http://www.travelnut.me/aleppo
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090719003816/http://www.lyon.fr/vdl/sections/en/villes_partenaires/villes_partenaires_2/?aIndex=1 to http://www.lyon.fr/vdl/sections/en/villes_partenaires/villes_partenaires_2/?aIndex=1
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://jamahir.alwehda.gov.sy/_View_news2.asp?FileName=103164560320100127234904
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: For years, Syria has been the scene of a bloody civil war resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of refugees, and the destruction of entire cities. The recent image donation by the Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen (the National Museum of World Cultures) in the Netherlands shows another Syria. Many of these photos were taken in the 1980s and show scenes of daily life and images and cities not yet devastated by war. Other images show objects from the collection of the museum. A number of these photos were taken in and around Aleppo and may be of relevance here. Together, they form a valuable resource on Syria for the various Wikimedia projects. The upload consists of 352 photos in total and can be accessed here. It coincides with a photo exhibition in the NMvW on Aleppo. The upload was part of the project The Netherlands and the World, which aims to make accessible Dutch collections on non-European heritage. Kind regards, --AWossink (talk) 11:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of Aleppo on Wikimedia Commons 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aleppo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.syria.strabon.org/ua/pm_villesmortes/antique-villages/index_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120109034118/http://www.aleppo.gov.sy/ to http://www.aleppo.gov.sy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Restoration of etymological texts in this revision, as they are actually correct despite the circumstances by which they were added.
:they were correct ? Do u have a reliable source to prove this ?.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sakura CarteletTalk 15:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2018 

message: WIKIPEDIA WAS MADE SO THAT EVERYBODY CAN SHARE INFORMATION FREELY, WITHOUT ANY BIAS AND PREJIDUCE BUT I THINK THAT IS STILL A DISTANT DREAM, 
THE WHOLE PAGE OF ALEPPO DOES NOT EVEN MENTION ABOUT THE TRADE BETWEEN INDIAN CITIES AND ALEPPO, SO MUCH SO NOT EVEN MENTION THE HINDU TEMPLE IN HISTORICAL SITES OF ALEPPO, THIS IS DOWNRIGHT SHAMEFULL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.144.159 (talk) 08:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: stop yelling, and fix it HammerFilmFan (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO MENTION OF INDIAS CONTRIBUTION 

message: The article mentions a 'Turanshah' which redirects to the historical figure that died 10 years before the Mongol invasion under Hulagu Khan. No reference is given. Does anyone have an immediate remedy before I delete this passage? HammerFilmFan (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Saladin had a brother called Turanshah, and a son called al-Mu‘aẓẓam Fakhr al-Din Abu Mansur Turanshah (b. July/August 1181 in Egypt). The wikilink in Aleppo article is taking us to Turanshah son of Ayub (who was a grandson of Saladin's brother al-Adel). The leader of Aleppo when the Mongols came was Turanshah son of Saladin (a very old man by then). There is no wikipedia article about him, and one should be created, but the passage here should be calrified, not deleted.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Mongol attack

message: The 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake has impacted Aleppo very harsh. Shouldn't it be mentioned in the article? Aminabzz (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earthquake 

message: So far three different users have attempted to remove the paragraph about Ali Janbulad under the claim that it is "unreferenced".
First, if you see something unreferenced on Wikipedia, you don't automatically delete it, especially when others want to keep it. You must open a discussion instead of trying to push what you want by force.
Second, in this case there is a link to another Wikipedia page, but those people are pretending to not see it.
Third, if the paragraph were unreferenced, those people should have looked for the references and added them to the paragraph instead of fighting with others to delete info that is correct and exists in Wikipedia.HD86 (talk) 19:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but you're missing the point, Wikipedia works primarily with consensus and the burden is on you to achieve consensus for inclusion of the disputed content. Please familiarise yourself with our guidelines, because so far, the only disrutive editor I see here is you, not the editors who reverted you.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 14:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Firstly, I'm not a ""boss" here, only an editor like many others. Secondly, "collaborative work"" does not mean edit warring, attacking fellow Wikipedians when you disagree with them and so on.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 07:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing