lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Russo-Swedish War (1788–1790)

message: The page on Gustav III lists Russian losses in the Battle of Svensksund at 7000. This page gives a much higher number. How are the numbers obtained and which one (or either one?) is correct ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.72.204.188 (talk) 01:04, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this battle was hyped up in Sweden enormously and various casualties are assigned to this battle at random. Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary says the Russians lost 55 ships and up to 600 sailors were taken prisoner. Actually, Prince von Nassau-Siegen was a fool to pursue the Swedes into their own port where his ships were easy prey for coastal batteries. He was fired as a consequence of this incompetence. --Ghirla -трёп- 16:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of ships lost by Russians is here. The same online book repeats the claims that Russian casulaties amounted to 7,000. --Ghirla -трёп- 17:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Losses

message: The War was fought against best advice and under outright protest from Swedish Military Command on royal authority unprovoked against Russia. 
It is, was, and should be called the Swedish - Russian war, since it was all in all a war declared by Sweden and fought solely on Swedish initiative. CS 21:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Swedo - Russian War
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators

message: Hello
Why did you deleted Daniel Hasidim page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Hasidim)?
Their is no problem with copyright issue with the page of the zionist billionaire forum [8].
Both pages were writen by the same man.
I added the page as a source.
What is the problem?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel12121 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The copying was the issue for the April and May deletions, but not for the latest one. In any case Hasidim should not be writing about himself here; see WP:AUTOBIO. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniel Hasidim page 

message: Could someone have a look at Sasan Adibi and share their opinion? The wikipedia article defines him as an "expert in health informatics". He seems to have published a decent amount, but the sum total of his citations is 940 . The field is trendy, so is this a lot? His two claims to notability appear to be receiving an award for a best PhD thesis from the IEEE Society (can't seem to locate info about that on ieee.org) and the fact that he's a senior member of the IEEE (this sort of membership is described over there: this requires some achievement in the field, but is something that individuals apply for, it's not granted like an award). – Uanfala (talk) 01:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't yet looked at the article, but neither a best thesis award nor senior membership are enough to pass WP:PROF. WP:PROF specifically rules out student awards, and to pass through having a selective membership grade he would need to be fellow, not just senior member. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sasan Adibi 

message: Hi, I came across this draft in the WP:AFC queue and am unsure of notability. If a member of this project could have a look and advise, that would be great. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:09, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say he passes WP:PROF due to high citation counts and being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you; that was helpful. I accepted the draft. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Sabu Thomas]] 

message: Hi David, I did not make that edit, it was done automatically by Twinkle through the AfD I proposed. Best Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 06:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to David Eppstein
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politicians

message: As we approach the 2018 elections in the United States, I suggest that we consider ending all discussions about an unelected candidate for elected office in the United States as procedural keep in the month prior to the election (in 2018 from October 6, 2018 to November 6, 2018) and we have similar pauses in the month before elections in other countries. (Note, this would not stop WP:BLPPROD or WP:SPEEDY deletions).
My reasoning is that as we approach the election, there are often arguments made to wait until the election to determine whether the candidate is successful (especially in areas where it is likely that a candidate from a particular party will win). In addition, there are often more supporters close to an election who care about keeping their candidate's page as a campaign tool. By procedurally keeping articles and then renominating them after the election, we can have a better sense of who is and who is not notable, outside of the intensity of a political campaign. 
We can keep a running list of nominated (or potentially nominated) articles about unelected candidates to bring back for deletion in November. 
Thoughts? --Enos733 (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed pause on AfDs for Candidates
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Russia

message: Talk:1991 Soviet coup d'état attempt#Requested move.  Not a deletion, but perhaps people who are watching this page would like to weigh in. -- Y not? 15:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[August coup]] requested move

message: *Category:Kontinental Hockey League first round draft picks – This category has been nominated for deletion. Dolovis (talk) 04:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Kontinental Hockey League first round draft picks]] nominated for deletion
Talk:List of United States state supreme court cases

message: I'm assuming in this case "state supreme court" implies the highest court in the system, not just the one with that name? 68.39.174.238 23:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the court of last resort for the state. bd2412 T 00:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: So...
Talk:Breath control

message: Mirage5000 02:25, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I agree with the above comment. "erotic asphyxiation" as much of a fad as it may have become, 
may be called "breath control play" by some, but it should not be referenced here. Asphyxiation is not breath control, it is external disruption of the breath. Let it be referenced in strangulation.
And while items like this find their way onto the page I am surprised that Breath Control as a MIDI parameter is not referenced here, after all that is literally Breath Control. 
--APDEF (talk) 07:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Empire Records

message: Most of the trivia is copied verbatim from IMDB -- should this be deleted?
The character's don't believe his name is "warren beaty". Their reaction to that is disbelief and they only call him that due to the fact that it is the only name he provides.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.224.52.40 (talk) 18:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First line under plot:  a "small, independent record store."  The place is HUGE for an independent record store.  I understand this is my opinion, but it's by no means small.  Championship Vinyl (in High Fidelity) is small.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.100.165 (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That was clearly meant as small as in small independent business with a single location, and not part of a large corporate chain, not small in terms of a floorspace. Rural or suburban stores can have huge amounts of floorspace (practically a warehouse) and still still be 'small business. (High Fidelity was set in Chicago, even that floorspace probably cost a small fortune compared to Delaware.) -- 109.79.171.9 (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLOT 

message: There is someone who keeps adding unreferenced, unverified texts about some sequel titled "Empire Records 2". There is no verified source for this information anywhere. Please stop adding this to the page! Piper13 (talk) 01:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire Records 2 

message: According to the film's credits, the version of "Hey Joe" featured in the film was performed by The Dirt Clods. Contrary evidence indicates that it was performed by the band Body Count, as this same version was included on a 1993 album called Stone Free: A Tribute to Jimi Hendrix.
This is corroborated by the Secondhand Songs listing for Hey Joe: https://secondhandsongs.com/performance/6903/versions 47.152.134.2 (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provenance for Hey Joe
Talk:Caesar IV

message: The "strategy or puzzle" game stub is, IMHO, less accurate than the "computer or video game" stub that was here before.Extreme Unction 16:33, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question! I checked and, currently, city building games are indeed listed as a sub-genre under strategy games in Wikipedia. There is no city-building cvg-stub template (and while it would be easy to add, I don't think we need one because it's too detailed) so the strategy-cvg-stub is actually the more accurate specific fit. If someone adds a few more paragraphs with current known facts, now or maybe after the game is released in a year, the stub note can be removed anyway. -- Sitearm | Talk 17:20, 2005 August 28 (UTC)
----
COOL! I am so happy! --M. Pokrajac 21:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the stub changed? 

message: I removed the link below and replaced it with the link to the demo.
Download Caesar IV Official Trailer
http://www.fileplanet.com/165468/160000/fileinfo/Caesar-IV-Official-Trailer-%5BQuicktime%5D
Feel free to add the above link again. --Starionwolf 18:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed link 

message: Wouldn't the 2 links under the See Also section leading to articles on computer and video games and the portal for video games be a tad unnecessary? If not then shouldn't all articles on video games have these links? Songjin 07:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary Links?
Talk:Final Fantasy XI: Chains of Promathia

message: Should this really have its own Wikipedia page?  Look at how short the article is... couldn't someone just merge it with the Final Fantasy XI article? Just a thought... 199.1.40.18 23:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I've added a list of the new areas in this expansion, hopefully this will make the article at least a little longer ;) Halliwell3 20:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added new areas

message: I'm going to remove the Reception section as POV and original research very soon unless someone can source it and NPOV it (which I doubt).  The reference tag has been up for quite some time now. -RaCha'ar 05:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I'm not questioning the veracity of it, but unless there's an article to source it from it's all hearsay and opinion anyway. -RaCha'ar 12:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, I'll try to look for some appropriate sites that we can use to confirm this. But what kinds of articles are valid? Are comments on the Allakhazam forum valid, for example? I'll look through Playonline sites as well, but they're usually very vague about these things. Halliwell3 14:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this will most likely always remain POV, since MMO RS are hard to find, i've removed it -- febtalk  18:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception
Template talk:Green

message: Please remove the usage section and replace it with the  template as I've created a documentation subpage at Template:Green/doc. A specific description of the request follows below. Thanks.
Change this:

<span style="color:green">{{{1<noinclude>|{{lorem}}</noinclude>}}}</span><noinclude>
==== Usage ====
 My <nowiki>{{green|color}} text.
Produces:
  My color text.
Category:text color templates
es:Plantilla:Verde
ro:Format:Green
</noinclude>
</nowiki>
To this:

<span style="color:green">{{{1<noinclude>|{{lorem}}</noinclude>}}}</span><noinclude>
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
{{Documentation}}</noinclude>

--Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 18:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Shouldn't this be substituted?— nerdfighter 00:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subst
Template talk:Blue

message: Please remove the usage section and replace it with the  template as I've created a documentation subpage at Template:Blue/doc. A specific description of the request follows below. Thanks.
Change this:

<span style="color:blue">{{{1<noinclude>|{{lorem}}</noinclude>}}}</span><noinclude>
==== Usage ====
 My <nowiki>{{blue|color}} text.
Produces:
  My color text.
Category:text color templates
es:Plantilla:Azul
</noinclude>
</nowiki>
To this:

<span style="color:blue">{{{1<noinclude>|{{lorem}}</noinclude>}}}</span><noinclude>
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
{{Documentation}}</noinclude>

--Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 18:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: - JPG-GR (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Islam in India

message: What about Islam in tamilnadu? 59.97.37.44 (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was researching India's major religions. Clicked islam to learn the basics and couldn't help but notice a separate wiki page for "Islam in India" almost as if apart and yet apart of the islam from there origins (basics, location and original?). My guess would be the reason is that the local atmosphere of other religions added to helped, enriched Islam in some fundamental way that couldn't be argued with. (Maybe denomination of?) "Islam in India". So to finally maybe answer your question?!? The same might hold true for "Islam in Tamil Nadu" local, regional, national and.....so on and so forth. Tomnookmr (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

text: There is Tamil Muslim. Capitals00 (talk) 10:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam 

message: Please add this redirect template at the top of the page.
 Summerindiasummer (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Meteorname (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 January 2024 

message: Lede comment "India also has the third-largest number of Muslims in the world." appears to be incorrect based on the reflink on which it is purportedly based (). 65.88.88.200 (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: CORRECTION NEEDED

message: The British enjoyed pitting various ethnic groups under their control against eachother. In my understanding, they did this a fair amount with the Hindus and Muslims. Yet the period of British rule is strikingly glossed over throughout this article. Certainly we have records from that time. Why aren't there sections about this era? Jdftba (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There is Islam_in_India#Role_in_the_Indian_independence_movement. What type of content do you want to add? REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 05:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a lot of emphasis on this trope in old-school Indian Nationalist writing, which should be taken with a large pinch of salt frankly. The British found the Muslims largely in charge in many parts of India, and as with many other aspects of the country, were reluctant and slow to change things much. "Divide and rule" is claimed to be the slogan, but really the British found India pretty pre-divided for them. But you are right, there is a big gap in the article. Johnbod (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Largely Ignored?
Talk:Final Fantasy Collection

message: Do the games really qualify as enhanced remakes? Aren't they really just ports with a couple of FMV videos? Nova Prime 17:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enhanced remakes? 

message: Could this article be split into the different games it included? Judgesurreal777 06:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a redirect to List of Final Fantasy titles#Compilations and collections could perhaps be clearer for readers. Kariteh 12:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross split
Talk:Wawa, Ontario

message: It should be noted that this proposed aggregate mine poses significant risks to the environment with little or no government regulation and has spawned a great deal of controversy both locally and nationally.
This subject does not belong on a page discussing the Town of Wawa. The above allegations originate from funded environmental pressure groups and are both incorrect, contentious, biased, and unproven and don't belong here. -
 
This second paragraph disputing the first seems a little biased itself.  First of all, you'd think "untrue" or "false" would have done in the place of "incorrect, contentious, biased and unproven".  (Also the use of the word "both" followed by four descriptors instead of two makes this comment feel more like an outburst.)  
As to the actual point of the argument: The Wawa article states that this Trap Rock Mine has caused new excitement amongst Wawa's community.  It would be unfair to imply the project's positive impact on the town without acknowledging the controversy surrounding it.  The author of the original comment was right regardless of the validity of these environmentalist's claims.  Dalhaus 03:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trap Rock Mine 

message: I think this article needs a map.
I created a map, and placed it on this article.  It is not the greatest map in the world.  But I thought it was better than no map.
Someone has removed it, without saying why.  I'd like an explanation.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wawa is a community within a municipality. The map is located in the article for Michipicoten. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 11:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  But does that mean this article shouldn't also have a map?  Geo Swan 00:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, community articles do not need maps. In actuality, the Township of Michipicoten has actually renamed itself Municipality of Wawa, so these articles will be merged. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 01:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: In the section regarding lake effect snowfall it should read "a northwest wind" or "winds from the southwest". 206.204.211.24 (talk) 16:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I said that incorrectly."a northeast wind" will create lake effect snowfall for wawa, or "winds from the southwest". 206.204.211.24 (talk) 16:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wawa is nw of lake superior
Talk:Edmund Charaszkiewicz

message: I have edited this article, sectioning it, pruning dispensable matter, and adding explanatory information.
I would appreciate any suggestions for further enhancing the article's readability and communicativeness.  logologist 02:58, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article contains a lot of details like unit names, personal names places, exact dates. Pavel Vozenilek 22:40, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "This article needs to be cleaned up."

message: This gentleman has been listed on the new Category:Organizations and people who predicted the collapse of the USSR can someone add a reference on the Category talk:Organizations and people who predicted the collapse of the USSR when he predicted this?
Thanks for the addition, I am interested in hearing from you. 
Thanks, Travb 13:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Organizations and people who predicted the collapse of the USSR
Talk:Howl (Black Rebel Motorcycle Club album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 24, 2005

message: A researcher, Dr. Rochelle Newman, at the University of Maryland recently found that TV background noise slows the development of a baby's ability to distinguish words, such as her/his name. I suggest that this might explain some of the increase in autism.  References:
and The Washington Post, April 24, 2005, p. B5
Pdn 03:17, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bomberman Jetters

message: Why the hell is bomberman a girl in this game? Note the name bomberMAN! MAN! Not girl. And the game sucks. Waste of time.
:You must be an idiot. Shirobon is NOT a girl in that game. He just has a high-pitched voice.
::Bomberman's always had a high-pitched voice (but it seems to be a different VA for every game...). And I disagree, GCN Jetters has a pretty good multiplayer, at least. And multiplayer is always what's good about a Bomberman game. --BPM 09:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Girl? 

message: I'm not sure about mine. Probably Max.
Zeeco 19:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is your favorite character? 

message: In which episode does she makes her came? I kinda wanted a screencap, to see that.189.4.82.167 (talk) 19:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty Bomber
Talk:Oaktree (foundation)

message: This page reads like it was taken from the mission statement of this organisation. It needs some serious NPOV work if it is to even come close to wikipedia's standards.
Morgan Leigh 11:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I am removing categorization for 'international development agencies' and 'international development multilaterals'. These categories should be used for official development assistance (ODA). Multilaterals are World Bank, United Nations, European Union, while the 'agencies' category is for bilaterals such as Government of Sweden, Great Britain, USA, Japan etc.  The categorization of the Oaktree Foundation as an NGO and charity appears to be both correct and sufficient. APB-CMX 09:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: I'm adding a tag for cleanup because the references are pretty messy. I don't know if a wikify tag would help this page too; any thoughts on that? GrainyMagazine (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gosh. That did require a clean up. Please let me know if you now think it's time to remove the tag. Thanks, Rangasyd (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: I propose merging content from the Make Poverty History Concert, and then redirecting it to this page for the following reasons:
# No indication of independent notability for the concert, or coverage beyond primary, quite local, and unreliable sources;
# Longtime lack of sources at MPHC, including claims about living persons that I've removed as unsupported;
# Its closest connection to The Oaktree Foundation and its associates.
If anyone has a comment for or against, please leave a note here. Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 08:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal