lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tammy Blanchard

message: I tried to add references, as requested by the template. All of her movies, tv appearances (more than are listed here, actually), and one Broadway show are referenced in IBDB and IMDB. Her awards/nominations are also referenced in those two sources. Just in case someone thinks those are not sufficient, I've included references to the official Tony Awards site (for her Tony nomination for "Gypsy"); the newspaper article from the NY Times which states that she won the Emmy for the Judy Garland tv movie), and the USA Today article which mentions that she had worked on Guiding Light, that she was cast in the Judy Garland tv movie, and also mentions her childhood in Bayonne. I have not, however, referenced each nomination separatly except as stated.
I did not find anything about her date of birth other than what is already shown in the external links on nndb.
The playbill.com article also verifies that she was in "Gypsy", has a few other bits about other work.
I will check newspaper articles from 2003 (when Gypsy opened) to see if there is anything more.
Until then, I'll leave the "unrefernced" tag on
JeanColumbia 13:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's definitely not unreferenced anymore.  I took the tag off.  I'm sure there's more to say about this actress, but the websites just seem to be hitting the same highlights.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 04:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: It'd be great to have a photo of this good-looking actress, wouldn't it? How would we go about that? And am I allowed to say "good-looking" without ruffling political feathers? It wouldn't bother me a bit if she thought I was good-looking—but that's probably beyond the scope of this article, isn't it? As you can see, I have several questions (ahem). – AndyFielding (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 
Talk:Shuhei Nishida

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17524. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NortyNort  (Holla) 12:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Shunpei Yamazaki

message: Does practically every patent application from his company list him as co-inventor? That would put these numbers in context and say more about the character of a person than his alleged creativity. Some applies to many on the top of the prolific inventors' list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.128.102.158 (talk) 22:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: The following was at Shumpei Yamazaki:
:Shumpei Yamazaki is the president of Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. as of 2004. He has over 3245 patents exceeding Thomas Edison's by approximately 1000. His research lead to the basic mechanism behind flash memory.
Note the lack of any reference for any of this. -- Hoary 10:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied over
Talk:Michelle Triola Marvin

message: The Andrew Malcolm of the LA Times reported on Twitter that she has died.   So far, I can't find any confirmation of this. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And now I've got one - http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_13679075. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Why does this article begin with the word "Incorrect"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.26.160 (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point. Even the court case was called Marvin vs. Marvin. For good measure, I think I'll check with WikiProject Biography. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

text: At least one other editor agrees. We can probably make a request at WP:Requested moves without controversy. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did she drop Marvin from her name later in life? Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 12:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I've read in any of the obituaries (although that could just be an omission). They all seem to use the name "Michelle Triola Marvin". The only ref/external link which doesn't is the IMDB link. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and moved the article to Michelle Triola Marvin. The best evidence that I can find indicates that this was still her legal name at her time of death. If someone objects, though, we can always move it back. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Would anyone agree that the main reason her divorce from Lee Marvin is notable, aside from the legal precedent, is that it was the subject of a famous SNL sketch with Dan Aykroyd and Jane Curtain (The "Jane you ignorant slut" sketch)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walterego (talk • contribs) 11:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: which sketch?  the "Jane you ignorant slut" thing was a recurring feature on weekend update.  are u saying that ONE of them dealt with the case? you're not saying the VERY FIRST ONE did, are u?  209.172.23.143 (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture
Talk:Neumark

message: Much of the dispute in October seems to have been about the population of the region in the 10th century and used this Polish government link as reference. From my understanding of the text, it does not mention the Lubusz/Neumark territory, nor does it specify the people who lived there. It does mention the unification of Polish tribes, but it does not say that Polans lived in Lubusz Land at the time or say what Slavic tribe lived there instead. The page, which seems to be a survey of Polish history for the unfamiliar as opposed to a scholarly work, does not specify how the region came under Polish control. I have edited the article to mention that the region came under Polish control during the rule of the dukes. Olessi 23:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early medieval history 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as originator. Olessi 19:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: How about changing the article title to the English name of the region, New March ? --Lysytalk 14:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name 
Talk:Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre

message: I see no reason why the section About ISRO needs to exist here. I suggest it be merged into Indian Space Research Organisation. 59.95.58.104 16:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge "About ISRO" Section into "Indian Space Research Organisation"  
Talk:Syntaxin

message: Hi there, you'd better open an account and edit the entries in Wikipedia. Unfortunately I am overengaged in many other activities, except editing in Wikipedia, that's why I couldnot update the entries that I have created. Please feel free to contribute any information you think is important, but one thing is sure - please add a REFERENCE, and possibly its PubMed id, it is easy! Danko Georgiev MD 05:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tile engine

message: I have done some preformatted blocks to improve readibility. But I do not feel the choice of language (ActionScript) to be the greatest choice. Would a more ideal english psuedocode be preferable? My personal bias is based on a lack of experience with ActionScript.
jptdrake 23:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Seems strange to single out Mega Man, Zelda and Shining Force when *every* console game of these generations used tile based backgrounds? 78.41.240.74 (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't all 8-bit/16-bit games tile based?
Talk:Takahira Kogorō

message: *1. The documentation which accompanies the uploaded photograph identifies J J. Korostovetz as seated at the negotiating table with others who worked on the Treaty of Portsmouth in 1905. The image comes from the following: 
** Davis, Richard Harding, and Alfred Thayer Mahan. (1905).  The Russo-Japanese war; a photographic and descriptive review of the great conflict in the Far East, gathered from the reports, records, cable despatches, photographs, etc., etc., of Collier's war correspondents  New York: P. F. Collier & Son.  OCLC: 21581015
*2. A quick Google search reveals that Korostovetz was secretary to Sergei Witte in this period; and the account of the treaty negotiations which was based on Korostovetz' diary is considered a credible primary source:
** Korostovetz, J.J. (1920).  Pre-War Diplomacy The Russo-Japanese Problem. London: British Periodicals Limited.
*3. A quick Google search of "Kokovtsov and Portsmouth" has not produced support that he was in the United States during the negotiations.
For these reasons, it would appear to be a mistake to replace Korostovetz (which is supported by a specific citation per WP:V) with Kokovtsov in this caption ... unless a credible source can be presented which contradicts the results of research which have been plainly cited here. --Tenmei (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image caption
Talk:Equate (brand name)

message: This article doesn't provide any substantial information to warrant it's own article.  See Durabrand for an example of a extra information. AdamWeeden 23:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This article provides little information on the brand. Anom8trw8 21:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Request
Talk:Ducal Palace, Urbino

message: User:Northglen added the following paragraph on 2006-10-09:The Ducal Palace is best remembered by the conversations which took place in the Hall of Vigils in 1517. They are recorded in The Book of the Courtier by Baldassarre Castiglione. In his book Civilization Kenneth Clark states, "For over a hundred years it formed everyone's notion of good manners. Actually it is much more than a handbook on polite behaviour, because Castiglione's ideal of a gentleman is based on real human values."  The book ends "with a moving discourse on the subject of love...(It) unites the medieval concept of chivalry with the ideal love of Plato."Apart from spelling and style errors (corrected here), frankly cannot see the relevance of this in the article devoted to Ducal Palace. Can one really think that one of the most important Renaissance palaces of the world is "best remembered" for such a stuff? And who's Kenneth Clark? Let me know and good work!!--Attilios 23:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :Well, Kenneth Clark is notable enough for an encyclopedia article, and the setting of Castiglione's famous book here is one of the most notable things about the Palazzo Ducale.  While Clark's praise of the Book of the Courtier itself may not belong here, I'm restoring what was valuable in Northglen's contribution to the article.  Wareh 20:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 1903 edition of the Book of the Courtier lists a footnote expressing the cost of building the palace at £400,000.  However, that would be in 1903 (or therabouts) pounds.  Any idea what that would be in today's money?  (This is in footnote 447).  The Jade Knight (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this calculator, that's equivalent in today's money to £32 million (using the retail price index) or £172 million (using average earnings). Wareh (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost 

message: It must be assumed that the uncited opinions on the design of the Palace, which I removed, were the editor's own, which violates NPOV policy.  There are Sources listed, and if those are the sources on which the deleted text was based, then they should have been cited internally.  Otherwise, the attribution of the design of the Palace after Laurana can only be speculation, i.e. POV.  The works in the Sources section, which I did not delete, came after the Clark source (and in 1969 Kenneth Clark was a preeminent art scholar), so if they provide a scholarly updating of knowledge about who built the Palace, then they should be cited specifically and by page, by footnotes in the narrative. — J M Rice (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architectural praise and opinion deleted 
Talk:Takashi Nagai

message: The style of this article seems more like a persuasive piece or historical fiction than an encyclopedic entry, thus I worry it may have simply been copy-pasted from another site (as is not uncommon for 'stubs') I'm going to go through and take out unnecessary or biased descriptions, but it'd be awesome if somebody who knew the topic would do a quick rewrite. 70.24.211.4 (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: — Assignment last updated by Publius2500 (talk) 19:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Remembering the Asia Pacific War
Talk:Beazley Medal

message: Hi everyone, 
Evaluating the article "Beazley Medal." 
Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There is nothing that distracted me from reading it. 
None of the information is out of data, and the article does not seem to be missing anything that could be added. 
I would criticize the fact that the article does not have pictures of the previous winners.
The tone was neutral, and none of the claims are biased. 
No, I think the author(s) of the article represented it clearly and concisely. 
The links do work, and the sources support the claims in the article. 
Each fact is cited correctly, and the information comes from neutral sources.
On the talk page, there are conversations going on about how to represent this topic and the last edit was made on december 17, 2018. 
The article is not rated and it is not apart of any WiKiProkects. 
Wikipedia does not discuss the topic any differently than we would in class. 
FatCookies123 (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beazley Medal
Talk:Takaya Imamura

message: since Imamura worked on many games, why not redirect to Nintendo Entertainment Planning & Development? WhisperToMe (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a while since I made that edit (back in April), but I think my reasoning was that Tank Troopers was the only game he was majorly credited for (as director); it's the only place he's mentioned in the Nintendo EPD article as well. V2Blast (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to where?
Talk:Ein HaShofet

message: The article mixes Jo'ara (the modern Hebrew pronounciation; ג'וערהׁ) with the kibbutz. Jo'ara is actually located 500 meters away from the kibbutz. I will split it.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 10:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   Ok, I don't have any strong opinion of wether it should be one or two articles, and the article actually stated that  Jo'ara was a km away from Ein HaShofet. I thought it was part of Ein HaShofet  territory by now? What you really need though, if Jo'ara is to stay a separate article, is to have some coordinates of the place, Huldra (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will not be home for another 10 days (24 if I do something stupid) so I won't be able to work on that article but if you want to get the coordinates, it shouldn't be hard. Jo'ara is today a known site in Israel and it appears in Google Maps.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 21:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jo'ara.
Talk:Bhabha scattering

message: Is the change from d sigma / d Omega to d sigma / d cos(theta) correct?  I don't have time to check it right now.  We should also say something about how we're neglecting Z boson exchange and also the electron mass.  HEL 16:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, at least in Peskin it's dsigma/d cos(theta)JabberWok 01:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differential cross section 

message: In the 'Uses' section, bullet point two: the second part should be removed, surely? It's just one of many reasons why having a precise luminosity measurement is a Good Thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.172.169.33 (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off topic stuff 

message: Hi, the gamma indexes are the same all over where there need to change to \_mu and \_nu (its only \_mu now)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.66.136.90 (talk) 08:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: error in Scattering term

message: Why don't the diagrams in this page follow the standard arrow convention? Dauto (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Standard convention seems to be to draw antifermions as arrows pointing backwards in time, which is not the case. Though it must be said that since antiparticles can be imagined as the regular particles going backwards in time the way it is drawn makes sense: An electron with an arrow backwards in time should be a positron, a positron travelling forwards is obviously just a positron, but a positron travelling backwards in time is an electron again - so the way this is drawn seems to help understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.5.255 (talk • contribs) 13:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is confusing. If the time axis is pointing upwards   in the diagram the standard notation would be electron on the bottom left and positron bottom right of the diagram. Very confusing as you currently have it. 65.32.241.94 (talk) 02:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

text: The standard convention is to draw the arrow the opposite way for anti-particles, so the arrows on the diagrams here are incorrect for the positrons.   I can provide a corrected SVG diagram, if I can figure out how to upload a revision of the diagram used here.  --Eric Myers 14:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feynman diagrams 

message: Suggestion: that someone with the necessary specialist knowledge add: (a) some plots of empirical data, and (b)  explanations of the features and trends visible in such plots. Doing so would complement readers' understanding of the topic. As it is now, the treatment is primarily devoted to mathematical derivation of the theory, and the explanation is poorly developed. Thank you John Pons (talk) 09:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for Empirical data 
Talk:Takeo Takagi

message: Takeo Takagi was in command of the 5th Cruiser Division, from 1941, September 6, to 1942, November 10 Materials of IJN: Takagi, Takeo. At the battle of the Coral Sea, he had under his direct command cruisers Myōkō and Haguro. Rear-admiral Hara was in command of the 5th Carrier Division (Shokaku and Zuikaku)Materials of IJN: Hara, Chuichi. Vice admiral Takagi was the senior commander at sea, but it was Vice admiral Inoue who was in command of all the Japanese naval forces for ″Operation MO″, from Rabaul, onboard cruiser Kashima.Paul-Pierre Valli (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takeo Takagi at the battle of the Coral Sea
Template talk:Swatch inline

message: They loop too easily after too many short edits, even when there is no self-referring.  And after I nestd the span tag in the code, the hex input no longer made a numeral list until I refreshd the template off another page and here, and for no reason the list was back.  Also, the one-parameter template had three span tags, also for no reason, whereas the three-parameter template with the gold input had two tags, as I'd expect.  After the list was back, every line had only two tags.  Now they hav one!—it looks like the templates refresh after every two edits or so. -lysdexia 16:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, cool, I can purge Wikipedia's cache. -lysdexia 18:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wp's templates are broken
Talk:Tei Yamauchi

message: I really don't think she is notable. I did some quick Google search, but could find any very basic bio info on her;e.g., kanji, birth date, etc. She didn't serve any important position, as far as I can tell from this quick research. Hence, this the merger proposal. -- Taku (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Fusajiro Yamauchi]]
Talk:Vicky Entwistle

message: Whatever Jaydenwinfindale (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

message: What did she do before 1997? She doesn't seem to appear on the radar of IMDB until Coronation Street, but she'd been around for years before then. Did she act in minor roles somewhere, or have another career? This information must be available somewhere. 79.68.236.197 (talk) 22:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a bit of what I could find. Mike H. Fierce! 02:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Before Coronation Street
Talk:The Erotic Network

message: There should not be a disclaimer warning about adult content because every article has them at the bottom. However, I would like to ask if anyone disagrees.--Ainlina (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, of course there shouldn't be a specific warning. It's an encyclopedia, you have to expect such material here. It's the same case as WP:SPOILER. So#Why 11:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Suggest removing that silly warning.  Fletcher (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, will do.--Thanks, Ainlina(box)? 10:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimer
Talk:Interposition

message: 166.135.184.74 (talk) 19:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

message: :The Constitution does not give state legislatures the power to determine constitutionality. That's what we have courts for. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A suggestion about the opening statement of this page. Interposition is a theory in which the states can stand between a rogue federal government and the citizens of that state. Although it is closely related to nullification, it is not nullification. Interposition is not "an asserted right of U.S. states to declare federal actions unconstitutional." It is the state's authority to stand between the people of a state and a federal government encroaching on the Constitution. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/272780?uid=3739776&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21102361463181
Interposition is what occurs after a U.S. State decides a Federal action is unConstitutional.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.100.254.73 (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This page should be about interposition, not nullification

message: This article could probably use an explanation of how this old legal theory/approach differs from the modern one of states choosing to legalize various drugs that are still federally illegal and refuse to enforce the federal laws against them. Probably some other similar examples (and one imagine that abortion is likely to become one of them if Trump has his way next election).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing from things like state legalization of federally banned drugs, etc.
Talk:Tōchūken Kumoemon

message: When was this page last updated? In 1915??!! Sloppiness knows no bounds in this "encyclopedia"... 88.74.210.243 (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living Person??? 