lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Botley Road

message: Seacourt Tower is located in West Way not Botley Road. so i am going to remove the photo 163.1.226.89 (talk) 12:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seacourt Tower 
Talk:Schizothymia

message: As far as I can tell, the concept of schizothymia has been largely superseded by that of schizotypy, which takes multiple dimensions that can lead to schizophrenia into account. As a clinical term, schizothymia sounds equivalent to the DSM-IV-TR's and the ICD-10's schizoid personality disorder. I see that, in the Articles for Deletion debate, a search results from PubMed were given, but I am willing to bet that most of the recent research merely cites the concept of schizothymia as a historical antecedent to the present state of affairs in schizophrenia research (unfortunately, ready access to the full article is not available from PubMed in most cases).
=== Direction for article ===
Unless references show a meaningful distinction, we are be best off having this term redirect to Schizoid personality disorder or possibly Schizotypy as these articles provide more up-to-date coverage of the same idea.
=== Sources ===
Anyone who can find references to either flesh out this article or show where most appropriately to redirect this term to would be most welcome.--NeantHumain (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This concept 

message: Anyone who can find references to either flesh out this article or show where most appropriately to redirect this term to would be most welcome.--NeantHumain (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Boultham

message: Mergefrom|Boultham, Lincoln|Talk:Boultham#Merger proposal|date=January 2009
Yes, Boultham, Lincoln should be merged into Boultham. --BSTemple (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Patrick Pillay

message: My apologies - I do not have time to write this into the article: Patrick Pillay is no longer Minister of Foreign Affairs, he is now High Commissioner to the UK.
* This: http://www.mfa.gov.sc/news.php?content_id=30&news_id=62 ...is the press release where the President thanked him for his work as MFA. (not dated)
* This: http://www.eturbonews.com/16616/seychelles-president-announces-cabinet-reshuffle ...is a news article listing the replacement MFA, Jean-Paul Adam. (June 2010)
* Here: http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/protocol/ldl-june2010 ...is the current version of the London Diplomatic List which shows him as the HC, effective February 3, 2010.
Dracunculus (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  updates
Talk:Alton railway station

message: As far as I can tell Basingstoke and Alton Light Railway did not serve this station as stated in the lead, but rather another station in the town Treloar's Hospital Platform railway station. If this is correct, could someone do the changes needed? SovalValtos (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I now see that it went further via Butts junction to join the main line to Alton, sorry. SovalValtos (talk) 21:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Routes
Talk:Alresford railway station (Hampshire)

message: Anyone know why the platforms in use part of the table isn't visible? if you open the article to edit, you'll see it has been entered... Tom walker (talk) 20:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the platforms for any Infobox UK heritage station are gone, I guess someone has broken the template.Scillystuff (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:Bourne End, Hertfordshire

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bournmoor

message: I corrected the intro to say that Bournmoor is in Co.Durham. It currently falls within Chester-le-Street District but this is soon to be replaced by the County Durham Unitary Authority. The postal address is Tyne and Wear as Royal Mail for some reason beleive the village is part of Houghton-le-Spring.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haz bear01 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  County 
Talk:Bourton-on-the-Hill

message: Inviting contributors to expand the article using the following Victoria County History account: 
'Parishes: Bourton-on-the-Hill', A History of the County of Gloucester: volume 6 (1965), pp. 197-206. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=66444 
--Bhogrok (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested historical reference material
Talk:Espionage organizations

message: This is an edited table from the list of espionage organizations in the espionage article. Organizations that are purely analytical, domestic, or counterintelligence only were excluded. Creating this article is part of an effort to bring more rationality to the set of HUMINT articles, moving fiction to other articles in order to keep size reasonable and focus specific. 
I am working on an article about clandestine human sources, which deals more with techniques, and also deals with the blurred line between HUMINT and offensive counterintelligence. 
While I haven't decided on a good name for it, I want to keep espionage separate from clandestine military deep reconnaissance/special reconnaissance/long-range reconnaissance etc., and those separate from reconnaissance by things that fly, float, or submerge.Howard C. Berkowitz 02:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:Bourton, Vale of White Horse

message: The statement that Bourton House was built in 1845 is in error. The 1841 census shows my Great Grandfather John Kent living there with his family. It was probably acquired by his father (another John Kent) some time after 1775. It may have been built by him, or may have been an expansion of an older structure. The younger John Kent sold Bourton House to Tucker in 1845, and it was significantly expanded thereafter. This is the source of the error in the reference to Pevsner. The sale is recorded in the Manor Court rolls of Shrivenham. There is no doubt that these records refer to the structure itself and not the enclosure, as I have personal records of John Kent's children describing life in Bourton House prior to his removal to Aldbourne in 1845.
Pleistocene (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bourton House
Talk:Government of San Francisco

message: every department should have a <ref> to its website
69.181.23.220 (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  departments and <ref> 

message: I made a recent edit about San Francisco’s ban on E-cigarettes and I wasn’t sure if I put it in the right category so if it’s the wrong category then feel free to tell me or fix it for me Thank you! Coopachup (talk) 03:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placing info in the right category.
Talk:Self-propelled travel

message: ...at least, according to all dictionaries:
: → http://www.answers.com/self-propelled
It seems that the word means no more and no less than automobile (synonym), or automotive if you will.
—6birc, 02:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm aslo puzzled by this name which I've never come accross in this context. I would have thought that this subject is adequately covered under human powered transport and its references--Theosch (talk) 15:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The important differentiation between self powered travel, and the definition from answers.com above is that it is the traveller who is self propelled not the vehicle.  The differentiation between this and the  human powered transport article, is that self powered travel is specifically recreational, a type of adventure travel.  While there may not be consensus on what to call it, there is growing popularity with this sort of travel.  Self-Propelled travel is the best term I've come across for it.--Keithonearth (talk) 22:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree with Keithonearth.  In addition, for the traveller to be self propelled, wouldn't that require using his/her own power? Certainly a passenger sitting in a rickshaw while the other guy runs in the front is not self propelled...  Göran Kropp was self propelled from Stockholm to Everest base camp except for the ferry ride that he took across the Baltic; he was not self propelled on his return trip. The other two names mentioned in the article, Angus and Harvey were partners across the Bering Straits, taking turns to row a modified sailboat. So at any given time, this was not much different than a rickshaw where one worked, other rested being moved by the efforts of "the other" and not "the self"... Later Angus took a partner to row the Atlantic, Harvey was a passenger on a sailboat, which would be wind powered and have an engine by law, further diluting a selfpropelled mention. Forresttravels (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  For all I know, the meaning is completely different
Talk:Bovington Camp

message: Wait, so not a word about T.E. Lawrence's death? rem486 Rem486 (talk) 23:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  T.E. Lawrence 

message: Why is the camp named Camp Bovington? It is not a village nearby - so it must be a Duke of Bovington or another celebrity? Gunnar (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly the farm?SovalValtos (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  eponym
Talk:Bowerhill

message: We could certainly do with more detail here! I will have to see what I can do... The Real Walrus (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, though it's a lot less pathetic than many Wiltshire geography stubs. Dzw49 (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bowldown

message: This is a farm, not a village. Dzw49 (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed article (which had just 7 words) into a redirect to Kington Langley. OS Landranger map dated 1985 shows Bowldown near KL, to the north of the village on Days Lane. Wire723 (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Bowness-on-Windermere

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: Is there a source stating that the pronunciation is ? I've never heard anyone say Bowness this way.  should really be  so that the 'ness' in Bowness rhymes with dress/mess/less and not 'niss'.
--▲RedScrees (talk) 23:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced so I've removed it now --▲RedScrees (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Bowthorpe

message: Isn't Bowthorpe part of Norwich? http://www.norwich.gov.uk/internet_docs/docs/Statistics/Greater_Norwich_map.pdf139.222.230.7 (talk) 15:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Boxford, Berkshire

message: "The included hamlet of Westbrook is on the opposite bank of the Berkshire Downs tributary."
Tributary of what river? If you mean the River Lambourn, it should be named. The Berkshire Downs have not been mentioned to this point and need a definition.
--Oldontarian (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification, please
Talk:Boxford, Suffolk

message: Sherbourne Street and Calais Street redirect here because there streets in Boxford but are sometimes refered to as hamlets in there own right. Sherbourne Street is also in the parish of Edwardstone, dispite being a part of Boxford. 
Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sherbourne Street and Calais Street
Talk:Andover railway station (England)

message: I have just removed a reference that suggested the station was known as "Andover Junction" from 1854 and as "Andover" from 1865. As the station wasn't a junction from 1854 to 1865 and then was a junction from 1865 onwards, the reference, though clearly following the work cited, is just as clearly wrong! Besides, I can remember the station being called "Andover Junction" in the 1960s. Johnlp (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: I'm planning on taking new pictures for this article since some of the current ones are nearly 10 years old and don't get a great view of the station, Anyone against this please say. SageWater (talk) 12:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New pictures 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Andover railway station →  – Title is ambiguous; see Andover station (MBTA) and Andover station (NJ Transit).  See also WP:NCUKSTATIONS. 162 etc. (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose - all other 'Andovers' are not in England and aren't heavy rail stations, so I would not personally agree that it's ambiguous. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 November 2022
Talk:Ansdell & Fairhaven railway station

message: Photograph added! Unfortunately when I took the picture (this morning) I noticed that the "Ansdell and Fairhaven" name signs have been taken (all but the left-most sign which is burried in trees/bushes and not in the picture!) MattKitty (talk) 07:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph added 
Talk:Boxted, Suffolk

message: It has been over a year since Fenstead End was suggested merging with this article, however no discussion has taken place.
Fenstead End is a tiny hamlet within Boxted Parish. It has no real notability, there is not alot that could be written about it anyway, and it is a strong candidate for AFD. The only reference the article has is an atlas, just to prove the place even exists. The these minor hamlets fit most comfortably into the article about their parish.
Merging is the most sensible option and is in keeping with many other similar articles.
--Rushton2010 (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Fenstead End]] to Here 
Talk:Braceborough

message: The involement of Dr Willis is well-known, but I doubt that George III was treated in 1841.  He died in 1820.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brunnian (talk • contribs) 04:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr Willis
Talk:Brackenthwaite, Buttermere

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Bradfield, Essex

message: Made a few minor corrections - hope everything was done correctly (not done this much before). Rscott101 (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bradley Mount

message: This "village" doesn't exist - all records of it stem from a single geodata provider, and there is no reference to it anywhere outside of Wikipedia and this dataset. 1rre (talk) 13:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Phil Bridger you objected the deletion request - do you have sources which point to this village being real before I move to Articles for Deletion? 1rre (talk) 13:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't looked for sources before objecting to the deletion proposal because no reason had been provided for deletion. On looking now (for example with this search) I can see that the name appears in addresses but I can see no indication that this is a village. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:55, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phantom settlement?
Portal talk:Aviation/Anniversaries/October 16

message: I deleted the sentence from the Hale Boggs crash that stated the crash led to Congress mandating ELTs for civil aircraft. The law was passed in 1970 as described on the Hale_Boggs page and emergency beacon page under History/United States.Kotaqua (talk) 04:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to 1972 made at 0415 UTC, 06 October 2017
Talk:Braithwaite

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Bramford

message: In chapter three of the non-fiction Further Particulars by CH Rolph, the author writes over two pages about an unoccupied haunted house in Bramford in the 1920s. 2.101.6.233 (talk) 10:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haunted former hotel in the early 1920s 

message: There is no population figure given for Bramford. How big is a "medium-sized" village? --Oldontarian (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 
Talk:Bramley-Moore Dock

message: The switchback was the high level coal line serving the coal quay at Bramley Moore Dock. At this point the Overhead railway went to ground level to run under the railway bridge. Look at 29 min 50 secs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1zayd4eR1Y  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.129.126 (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhead railway view of dock
Talk:Dionisio D. Martinez

message: The text of the article, as it stands at this point, is a word-for-word, plagarized copyright violation from page 1030 of the The Noroton Anthology of Modern and Contemporary Poetry, Volume 2: Contemporary Poetry, third edition, 2003. I'll be rewriting and footnoting it to that source. -- Reconsideration2 (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Brampton Street

message: Brampton Street is effectively part of Brampton, Suffolk. Not sure whether it needs it's own page. -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

message: No sources, no proof of historical importance, no need for this article. Imsome (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Brampton, Carlisle

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: The edit regarding the Brampton and Beyond Community Trust appears to be promotion, the editor seems to be the Trust itself.
Devokewater (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Brampton and Beyond Community Trust

message: I had updated the pages this evening and added some weather data. All the data is 100% accurate from the Met Office station I manage. Sadly the new pages were deleted by a moderator. I'm now being accused of being a vandal. This is clearly untrue. Just trying to update a page about my home town. Can anyone help. Thanks Paul PaulACrabtree (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As a reader I would expect to find weather information in the article for a region or maybe a major city, but not for every smaller settlement. On the other hand, the introductory sentence (in this version) stating that there is an official Met weather station does give the reader the context to understand why the section is included here, so it's not jarring. ⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 21:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted section about Brampton Weather
Talk:Brampton, Suffolk

message: I'm proposing that we merge Brampton Street with this article. There's very little notable content over there so the merge should increase efficiency. Any comments? Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Dolce Vita (TV programme)

message: Regarding the previous run of edits removing redlinks - first, "readability" is not a valid reason for removing redlinks.  Notability is, if the subject does not meet notability requirements.  But simply removing redlinks because they are redlinks removes notation from Wikipedia of the desire for new articles.  Redlinks are how we track what is needed to expand Wikipedia, so don't remove them unless there is a reason that meets notability standards (see: WP:NOTE). ButlerBlog (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing redlinks
Talk:Bramshott

message: I cannot fathom what the sentence beginning "These four manors" is intended to convey. SovalValtos (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The article is not well-written, and it's on my 'to do' list when I have time (unless someone else pre-empts). I'm sure there's much more on this ancient village that can be gleaned from published works and the internet to make the article better. Tony Holkham (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bramshott Manor 
Talk:Bramstan

message: The article says that Bramstan is just the 3 "Bramstan ... " roads, but Googling produces "Bramstan Post Office" here, on Summerfield Drive and the far side of Leeds and Bradford Road,  and "Bramstan Recreation Centre" here, even further north-west on Calverley Lane.  Are there any sources which define Bramstan? PamD (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Bramstan, and how big is it? 

message: Where is your evidence ???
--Whohe! (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bramstan ?
Talk:Brancepeth

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: The referenced sources in this version. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dpmuk (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Celinda Lake

message: While working for the campaign of Joe Biden a report of hers discussing Hillary Clinton's weakness in a general election was leaked. 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1435441/The-most-influential-US-liberals-81-100.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronas (talk • contribs) 02:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: she is a lesb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:6930:6DAA:2794:60A8 (talk) 21:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  lesbian