lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cryptography/Cipher vs Cypher

message: Matt, In order to leave room for alternate views, I have moved you advocacy line a little lower. Others can reply in their own blocks of advocacy. I trust this doesn't unduly offend, none was meant. 
I also added a comment at books using cypher as was apparently intended, though it's within your advocacy block. Hope that's all right with you. 
ww 14:34, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Collocation

message: http://www.visuwords.com/?word=referee 
http://llohe-ocd.appspot.com/
Peterkempen (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How about in the computer server sense, i.e., the Wikipedia servers are collocated at a data center in Florida? cluth 11:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valuable external links 

message: I think the motor cyclist example is a poor one. A google search today shows about 57,800 hits for "motor cyclist" with the quotes, and about 3,100,000 hits for motorcyclist, about six times more common. A better example would be any two-word compound that is never combined to form one word. But, as I am not a linguist, I leave it for someone more expert to confirm my intuition and make this change. Anomalocaris 06:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  motor cyclist? 

message: 'kick the bucket' (an example used) is more than a collocation - it is an idiom!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.191.64.147 (talk) 08:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  kick the bucket 

message: Dear writer,
I don't know if I am here at the right address, but by here my remark.
As far as I could analyze the word "mad" is a collocation of the words "mean angry and dangerous".
Am I wrong?
Regards.
85.149.24.135 (talk) 12:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: For one thing, the word mean got that sense long after the word mad ('insane') existed. —Tamfang (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collocation? 

message: Describe a helpful a person at study  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.113.196.186 (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingliz tili
Talk:Bottom-up parsing

message: I wrote this up a few weeks ago, and perhaps some of it might be incorporated into this page.  I hereby give permission for its incorporation, in whole or in part, under the terms of the GNU FDL.  - Dominus 16:28, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of Yacc 

message: Hi Perey, good thing you decided to overhaul the article. Are you planning on re-inserting the caveat to the brute force method, namely, the empty string? If the RHS of a production is the empty string, a brute-force shift-reduce parsing attempt will run forever. I think that's rather important. -- UKoch (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brute force: Caveat empty string 

message: The packrat parser is a recusive descent parser. Therefor it is a Top-Down parser.Ceving (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, here is a decent source that discusses packrat parsing. It's definitely top-down. https://bford.info/pub/lang/packrat-icfp02.pdf  I see no room for doubt so I'll remove it from the list. If someone really insists it's bottom-up they can add it back and link here with Template:Dubious or something. 86.82.133.193 (talk) 11:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the Packrat parser a Bottom-Up parser?
Talk:Nannerl's Music Book

message: Might it be better to describe all of these Mozart works in this article rather than giving them each an article of their own? They're all quite short (as far as I know) and uninteresting (well, them being the first things WAM wrote gives them some interest, I guess, but musically they're nothing), and having an article on each would mean quite a lot of duplication.
:I don't think there is anything per se wrong with small articles, and it makes it easier to refer to the pieces in other articles. — Stumps 13:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it to Nannerl Notenbuch which is the name used in many sources, such as the Cambridge Mozart Encyclopedia and Grove's. — Stumps 13:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:All in the Family

message: The setting section needs to have the "time" not just the "place".  I would edit it but I am not sure.   To me it looks like it is set a few years earlier than contemporary, perhaps beginning in late 60s?  Does anyone know what years it is  beyond "the 1970s"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.218.192.199 (talk) 08:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Exactly when is the show Set?

message: It's premature to put anything in yet, but All in the Family's record of spin-offs will be tied in 2020 when the Star Trek franchise debuts its 7th spin-off, Picard. But it hasn't been released as yet. And an animated 8th spin-off is also coming next year. Here we go into what is considered a direct spin-off, but this article specifies that it includes direct spin-offs and spin-offs of spin-offs, which is what Picard would qualify as. Anyway, once Picard comes out, the statement will need to be updated. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Spin-off statement will need updating in 2020

message: This section really needs a close revision or rewrite, there are numerous errors and unsourced material. An example is the statement on the page claiming this as being the first major television show taped in front of a live studio audience. That was done by I Love Lucy in the 1950's. There are no sources specified in this article to verify any of this as being more significant than that. Soludos2 (talk) 08:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors in History and production section
Talk:M. Karunanidhi

message: In the controversies, you have to add about not only his son, but also his another son, daughter, grand son, nephew, grand nephew. 
  And in the corruption list, they didn't add an important 2G spectrum. Due to that only, he had lost his position. 2409:4072:6D85:473:898C:3199:47F6:2C4E (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2021 

message: 2409:4072:6080:D5BC:0:0:1C59:98AD (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2022 

message: Chinnammarism (talk) 15:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. aboideautalk to me! 15:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

text: - SUNEYE 1 16:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2022 

message: P. Balaji 2409:4072:8E98:5742:9D8E:A6E0:E3ED:5ED8 (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2022 

message: Please kindly add in 1991 Karunanidhi win elections, but he resigned over his party's defeat. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/karunanidhi-kalaignar-1308243-2018-08-07So please add information in infobox in (1989-1996) as (1989-1991) and section Leader of the DMK (1991-1996) add "after he resigned". 1w469rhb (talk) 11:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add information more
Talk:FIRST Frenzy: Raising the Bar

message: This text was used with permission from Friarbot.com - although I did copy/paste it, as one of the webmasters for Friarbot.com I have full permission to use it.
If there are any questions, feel free to contact the Friarbot.com web team at friarbot(at)friarbot.com - thanks!
~Goobergunch
Is it OK to redirect to the FIRSTwiki article? --Astronouth7303 16:28, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye.  Although the article could probably be better written then just the stuff from friarbot.com.  --Goobergunch 17:39, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: I added an infobox and created a template to use on other game pages.  I don't remember how many regionals there were in 2004, so please add that someone.Bryan Duggan 05:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox added 
Talk:Apparatchik (fanzine)

message: This happens to be a few things that are often spelled with "R" instead of "R" for reasons realting to Russian. How many can you name?? 66.245.30.110 19:27, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: See the Ya page. Feel free to add other prominent cases there. Mikkalai 19:44, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "R" instead of "R"
Talk:Vorticism

message: Comment from Camembert: nice edits, but I think "swirling" makes it sounds a bit... well, swirly (like Delaunay or somebody)
* I agree- "swirling" is not ideal. I was looking for another synonym for Vortex which apparently was meant somewhat literarly by Ezra Pound. I think the idea is that your eye is supposed to wander around the canvas and be drawn in to the centre to give the impression of dynamic movement. Perhaps Vision of Ezekiel 1912 by David Bomberg is better example of a spiral/voxtex composition, although it really is a little early and too figurative. As the description stands without a vortex or swirling it could as easily apply to a 1960 Bridget Riley (on the other hand given Bomberg's Ju-Jitsu 1913 perhaps that isn't so far off the mark).
::Well, I think you gave it a good shot, but "swirling", like I say, just struck me as too... I dunno, smooth, lyrical. I'd probably say that typical features of Vorticism are a sense of dynamism, the use of sharply angled lines, and the use of fairly flat colour; I'm not sure, to be honest, that I'd say anything like a vortex is a consistent element, but that's just me. It's hard to talk about these things - we'd be better off with some images to illustrate what we mean, I think (thanks for adding that link to the Lewis - it's a good start). --Camembert
:::Fair enough. Worse than Delaunay, Swirling could leave an impression of Van Gogh's Starry Night, so best to leave it as is for now. - Solipsist 00:04, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no opinion on swirling or any other term, because I don't really know what Vorticism is. But the language now isn't too helpful. More about the substance of the movement would be appreciated. Also, perhaps more examples would be helpful, if they are available. Cheers. Still A Student 18:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Swirling
Talk:Roaming

message: The 'The roaming process' section writes about 'visited network', 'home network' and 'host network'. It is unclear to me what 'host network' means in that context. Abu ari 14:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed: 'visited', 'home' and 'host' networks. 

message: I propose that Inter standard roaming be merged into Roaming. I think that the content in the Inter standard roaming article can easily be explained in the context of Roaming, and the Roaming article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Inter standard roaming will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. JanetteDoe (talk) 01:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Inter Standard Roaming claims that "In Europe there is hardly any CDMA network". How old is that claim? Europeans often use the term UMTS which may sound different from CDMA, but the claim as such is just wrong. Anyone care to fix this in a way that this claim is removed while the rest of the paragraph still carries meaning?
Olfan Doe (5.1.129.32 (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No CDMA networks in Europe? 
Talk:Gravenhurst, Ontario

message: Uh, yeah, the demographics listed on the page are complete nonsense. I'm deleting that racial profile bit, not only because its wildly inaccurate, but because it seems completely irelevant besides the point. 
24.226.127.231 02:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Gravenhurst Ontario's Racial Profile

message: Here is the Hamilton, Ontario infobox, please fill it out with the corresponding gravenhurst info. Alan.ca 07:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: "The camp also had its own small zoo that had a monkey and a black bear that prisoners would wrestle as a form of exercise." I thought of putting citation needed, but since there's a 95% chance it's vandalism (if it isn't,I'd love to know since that would be pretty awesome) I just moved it here. ❃Adelaide❃ (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed implausible text from camp section
Talk:Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga

message: Did she give up her Canadian citizenship to assume the presidency of Latvia?
GAW
: I can't find anything to describe if she's a dual-citizen of Canada, but I'm sure she returned to Latvia after independence and became involved in her homeland's political errands. I like for any wikipedian to do actual research on the issue. -- G. Sageha
::Yes, she did around the time she was elected - according to Latvian law president can't have dual citizenship (acctualy no one can, but some apparently do...) -- Xil/talk 02:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian citizenship 

message: I've rewritten the article and included an honours section.
     The article reads remarkably as if written by Mrs. Vike-Freiberga herself, or her PR agents. I've seen very few more obviously self-written entries on politicians. I suggest toning down the advertising language and leaning more towards impartiality and factuality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.101.241.6 (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Now that she is no longer president, shouldn't the infobox  be removed from the article? Its continued presence may be confusing... — Zalktis 18:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This box can be found in some articles not mentioned there, but if you think it's confusing, I think it can be removed - no other article on president has it, even Zatlers' didn't - I just placed it there  ---- Xil/talk 13:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox? 

message: At the begining of the article, it says that she was "oficcially" postulated to be the Sec. Gen. of the UN. This is completly contradicting the United Nations Secretary-General selection, 2006 article that, in the 'Background to the 2006 race' section states that evendoe there was a campaign for a women to be the Secretary General, there were no official postolations made.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.198.100.192 (talk) 03:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it isn't, it seems you didn't bother to read everything the other article says ~~Xil (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  UN Secretary General postulation 
Talk:Peter J. Weinberger

message: During a talk in about 1985, I recall that Dennis Ritchie publicly gave credit to Peter Weinberger (I think), for his identification of the 2 places in Unix where streams could be implemented by simply inserting the appropriate function calls. Can anyone verify or corroborate this? I do not have access to the Unix source code to verify this on my own. Ancheta Wis 20:49, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a major accomplishment to be a computer programming language designer, especially one as influential as AWK, which is a forerunner of Perl, which was used to develop the first version of Wikipedia, for example. The man is notable and deserves an article in Wikipedia. Ancheta Wis 02:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Streams developer
Talk:Bernard Wasserstein

message: Why did Maximus Rex HTML comment out my To Do: list? I've seen these (and been doing them) on wiki before?--Vsb 22:31, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wasserstein, Bernard
author of an important article in TLS on re-assessing Hannah Arendt's "On Totalitarianism"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grshiplett (talk • contribs) 00:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  significance
Talk:The Who by Numbers

message: Whoa guys. NPOV here. -- Diehard2k5 21:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Non-notable song that does not merit its own article. Merge into the album that it is from. TYelliot | Talk  | Contribs 00:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Blue, Red and Grey]] 

message: On the "However Much I Booze" page, it has been suggested that the song be merged with this album. I have added more to it, and I think it is a sufficient length. Any thoughts? Beatleswhobeachboys (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[However Much I Booze]] - Why not to 
Talk:Haida mythology

message: There is a question pertaining to this article on the Reference Desk, if anyone wants to take a look. Mark Richards 23:47, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question on refdesk

message: Since the Haida culture still survives, and many people still believe in their cultural beliefs, should we change the title of this article from "Haida Mythology" to "Haida Beliefs?" Bob2357 (talk) 00:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the title of this page change to become more politically correct?
Talk:1916 Summer Olympics

message: Why does this need a Wikipedia article?? Are there many people who think there really were Olympics in 1916?? 66.245.119.206 00:04, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: H.L. Mencken had something to say on that point - not about the Olympics, but about it being impossible to underestimate the intelligence of...ah well, people, I don't want to be US-centric here ;-) even when it's directed at my own country. Ellsworth 22:54, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: For the sake of completeness, if nothing else. It could even go further in-deph, illustrating how much work was done, and the details behind the cancellation. Nprefontaine 23:41, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

text: There was planning and preparation.  It was not a null event. -68.90.158.6 (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: ...because the IOC designed to Berlin over Budapest...
Huh?  --zenohockey 06:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible phrase 

message: According to this web site: Marcolympics, site dedicated to all Olympics programs (www.marcolympics.com) the Games of the VI Olympiad was scheduled to start in Febraury 1st to August 20, 1916: From 1 to 6th Febraury would be celebrated winter sports competitions.--Nekko09 (talk) 23:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berlin 1916 dates 

message: I suggest that if it is ultimately decided not to move this page, that the section "Before the war started" be removed. It seems to have been written at about a high-school level to begin with, and I heavily edited it before finally giving up. Rontrigger (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Before the war started"
Talk:Full Circle (The Doors album)

message: Hey, should the non-album track "Tree Trunk" be mentioned in conjunction with the article? After all, it's one of only three non-album tracks The Doors released. The others, of course, being "Who Scared You?" and "Don't Go No Further". Hey, what track was it a B-side to, anyways? --Tirolion 12:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles
Talk:Matthew Smith

message: I question these page moves.  Remeber Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that happens be on the Internet, not an Internet encyclopedia.  It should thus not reflect the current biases of the Internet. - SimonP 22:05, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
I think that "Matthew Smith" or "Matt Smith" (with redirects, including from Mathew Smith) should be a disambiguation page.  I don't think that any of the Matt Smiths are "clearly predominant" in the same way that Rome might mean a village in Ohio.  --Mrwojo 00:00, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Code of Hammurabi

message: The original nominator  seems to have gone inactive without word, but the article is essentially FA standard already, having been more than half way through the actual FAC process. Perhaps another go at FAC might be worth it—, I see you assisted the nominator quite a bit, any interest in nominating the article with me? Aza24 (talk) 06:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't feel conversant enough with the source material to be a co-nominator; I wouldn't be able to respond knowledgeably to reviewers' questions. But I'd be happy to assist however I can. A. Parrot (talk) 06:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

text: @Aza24 Hi! Thanks for the interest. I do actually have time and I would like to re-nominate this. I stopped last time because of life events, though I'd also become a little frustrated by the edit suggestions, many of which seemed to be personal-preference style tweaks with no basis in house style. Anyway - I should have some more time now and would be happy to reopen noms myself this weekend. Emqu (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , that is so wonderful to hear, the article is all yours. I'll keep an eye on the FAC incase any trouble arises. Best – Aza24 (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

text:  It's a bummer that your work hasn't gotten what it deserves. I'll try to attend to some of the issues raised by editors. Hopefully you can come back when you have time, as I would be happy to do a source review and perhaps show some sources that I've found. Wretchskull (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another go at FAC?
Talk:Cognitive Research Trust

message: This page survived vfd. See: Talk:Cognitive Research Trust/Delete -- Wile E. Heresiarch 02:03, 26 May 2004 (UTC)

message: CoRT lessons consist of six different sets of ten thinking tools each.
CoRT 1: Breadth 
CoRT 2: Organization 
CoRT 3: Interaction
CoRT 4: Creativity
CoRT 5: Information and Feeling
CoRT 6: Action  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerfuffle53 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CoRT Tools 