lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blue Army (Poland)

message: An editor is blanking statements sourced to this passage, excusing his actions by OR claiming that, in his words, ": No! Stop. Misrepresenting. The. Source. It does not say that the Poznan Regiment AND the BA committed pogroms in these places. It says that EITHER one of these did."
Here, again, is the passage:
"The situation in Kresy Wshodnie and Galicia also reflected the psychological imprint of the four years of continuous warfare, for World War I and the frontier wars made the residents of these areas inured to brutalities and suffering. The violence not only served the immediate needs of personal enrichment but also provided a legitimate and relatively easy target - Jews - upon which to unleash personal frustrations. Looting and robbery, therefore, were consistently accompanied by beatings, rapes, and wanton destruction of prayer books and sacred scrolls in the synagogues. The congruence of ethnic and ideological animosities also precipitated assaults. Two units - Poznan regiments and General Josef Haller's army - especially earned the reputation of notorious Jew-baiters and staged brutal pogroms in Sambor, the Lwow district, and Grodek Jagiellonski. The anti-Jewish zeal of these soldiers derived from the situation in the Poznan province, where Jews sided with the Germans during the Polish-German conflict in the winter of 1919. Similarly, the actions of Haller's army, which had arrived from France, might be explained by the fact that some contingents came from the United States, where Jewish-Polish relations went from bad to worse during World War I."
I have bolded the word "and."
Is there any reason to doubt that the two units were named as both being involved in such activities?
Conveniently not seeing relevant words is becoming a pattern for this editor.  On another article he blanked sourced information without discussing proposed changes first: , stating " I don't see anything like that in the given source - please provide precise page" (the reference included the page range 146-150); I added the info with the page 146 and the specific quote.Faustian (talk) 22:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the same paragraph.  A list of activities are described, and these two units are both named as the main perpetrators of such acts.  Do we need a third RFC to discuss this issue?Faustian (talk) 02:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

text: I don't think we need another RfC: the text is relatively clear, and as I pointed out earlier, if we're really worried about the implications of Prusin's words we can imitate their language directly. -Darouet (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Prusin again
Template talk:Japanese Collaboration nomination

message: The links to the listing does not work. // Habj 23:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I have removed the template from som old nominations, but those that are subst:ed - those I can not find. IMO it is better not tu subst the template. // Habj 09:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subst:
Talk:Young Liars

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Can anyone get a list of performers on here? They've changed their performers a lot so it'd be nice to see. 141.161.69.218 (talk) 04:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Performers?
Talk:Botwood

message: The position in the box at the bottom of the page is wrong.  Bishop's Falls and Grand Falls-Windsor are south-west of Botwood, not east.  I don't know how to deal with census divisions, so hopefully someone else will see this and fix it up.  If it's not changed in a while, I'll come back and try to fix it.  I'm going to put a box in the newly created page for Peterview, however, and I'm going to put communities only in it.  OZLAWYER  talk  23:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  OZLAWYER  talk  03:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Position is Wrong

message: Response to my query about wartime crashes:
“During WWII we had two plane crashes with fatalities. The first one was in Oct of 1942 with the crash of American Export Airlines, Sikorsky VS-44, the Excalibur. In this crash, 11 people perished and 26 survived. The other plane crash was a Canso amphibian flying boat in Nov of 1943. In that crash 7 perished and 5 survived. And to my knowledge, a soldier was hit by a train and killed while trying to cross a railway crossing. “
Lisa Hemeon
Tourism, Heritage and Special Events
Town of Botwood
2022 November 28 Humphrey Tribble (talk) 09:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crashes
Talk:Too-Rye-Ay

message: The main article could be improved if a word or two were added explaining the meaning of the album's title.  As a hybrid between jazz or 'soul', and folk music, in what way are these two forms of music crossed?  
What does the album's title mean? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.177.27.11 (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the album 

message: Whoever set the genre as new wave is retarded.  However, I don't know what would be the best replacement for this. 70.48.100.137 (talk) 00:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There's really no resemblance of new wave in the entire album. The genre could at least be set to what the band page genre is: "pop rock, blue-eyed soul, and Celtic folk". All of those are much, much closer to the sound of the album than new wave. The person who set it to that is obviously deaf. 2601:203:4300:C280:4588:567B:1CBA:9711 (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Assiniboine Park Conservatory

message: Yes I agree, I wrote the article back int he early 1990's and I should have looked on WikiP to see if there was an article on just the Park, so please if it makes it more clear, Merge it. WayneRay 23:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

message: It does seem to be a bit different from the park itself, I added a link to my article and I will put the otherone on my main Botanical Gardens page. WayneRay 20:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merging
Talk:Artie Maddicks

message: Just to let those know that the reason that POWER PACK #27 was deleted from the Bibliography listing was due to the fact that he didn't appeared within said issue and was only mentioned BTS. PaxHouse 00:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Is there any reason why this is the main Artie page? Minor comic character seems less important, then, say, the Strongest Man in the World! -67.160.207.191 02:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. See above rationale. Artie Maddicks or Arthur Maddicks both make more sense, even if he is rarely referred to by his last name.  — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.153.84.10 (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig

message: Is the blue-tongued boy in X-Men II really Artie Maddicks? If so, what's the source of said information? -- Noclevername 04:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie?

message: Seemingly, Artie can make full scale holographic diagrams of machinery nobody actually understands. Will research later. Lots42 (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers
Talk:Smell of Camphor, Scent of Jasmine

message: The movie is released in USA under the title "Smell of Camphor, Scent of Jasmine", in 2001. This is actually a much better translation, compared to "Smell of Camphor, Fragrance of Jasmine". Jahangard 20:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Dick Weber

message: Dear Wikipedia:
The PIPE Here...and I consider myself VERY lucky to have MET Dick Weber in person, way back in August of 1986, when he made a personal appearance in a bowling center in Boston, MA.
I have a PHOTO of Dick Weber I'd like to contribute to Wikipedia, to use for the article about him (and it's "only him" in the photo), taken by myself during that 1986 appearance he made in Boston.
Would it be all right to contribute it, without any copyright problems...I AM the person who took the photo, with his permission, that I'm submitting...it's just that I WOULD like to have people see what Dick looked like.
Yours Sincerely,
The PIPE
at the-pipe@comcast.net !!
=============================================
Reference 3 cited in the last sentence of the article states that Dick Weber was photographed holding a Hammer brand bowling ball.  I fail to see how this supports the accusation that he is a closet homosexual.  If my reading is correct, that these accusations are few and widely discredited, I fail to see how this last sentence adds value to the article.
Kanaugle (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Reference 3 cited in the last sentence of the article states that Dick Weber was photographed holding a Hammer brand bowling ball.  I fail to see how this supports the accusation that he is a closet homosexual.  If my reading is correct, that these accusations are few and widely discredited, I fail to see how this last sentence adds value to the article.
Kanaugle (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: =================================
Talk:Lai (poetic form)

message: How is the word pronounced? It is very unclear given the spelling. --Pmetzger 15:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: There is a secnd, contrasting definition of the lai (lay), a French form which consists of one or more nonet stanzas (nine-line stanzas). Rhyme pattern is aabaabaabaab, the "a" lines have a syllable count of 5, the "b" lines of 2. Another related form, also a lai, is the lai noveau. (see Turco, "The Book of Forms")  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Appletowns (talk • contribs) 12:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 
Talk:Nitrosonium

message: This article is all about the BF4- salt.  This is the form that is almost universally used. Options:
*1) move it all to NOBF4.  My recommendation.
*2) leave a skeleton on NO+ and with "see also"
*3) do nothing.
Comments?--Smokefoot 23:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a move to NOBF4 is the best option.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NOBF4
Talk:Pontiac GTO (2004)

message: The reason I suggested the merger is that all the info contained in this article is pretty much in the regular Pontiac GTO article.  Also, it extends past the 2004 generation, making this article redundant.  Other articles that discuss one generation are isolated to one generation.  Bok269 23:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Other vehicles do not have separate pages for their revivals (even if they are several decades apart). All this information (if not already) should be included on the main GTO page and this should be redirected there in my opinion. -HumanZoom 04:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Merger
Talk:Stonewall (comics)

message: I removed Brotherhood of Evil Mutants from previous alliances, because Stonewall was never a member of the Brotherhood. He joined the group a couple of years after it had become Freedom Force. I think Crimson Commando and Super Sabre deserve separate entries under previous alliances because they were allied as an unnamed trio before they join Freedom Force. I'm also not sure that it's been confirmed that Stonewall is mutant, but I think that's best to leave pending confirmation. --JamesAM 23:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Balance of power (international relations)

message: "[...] it is generally agreed that bipolar systems as each great power has no choice but to directly confront the other."
Is this an actual sentence? What is it trying to say?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.117.63.26 (talk) 03:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing wording

message: This article is almost solid jargon, and really really could do with clarification and simplification - its extremely hard word to read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.246.64 (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have modified the doctrine of equilibrium section and improved the structure, although more needs to be done.  It especially needs to be cleaned up, as it is copy/pasted directly from other sources
see: http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Balance:of:power.htm and http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Balance_of_power
Dynamo152 (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctrine of Equilibrium 

message: I changed the name of the author of this work. It was Charles Davenant who wrote it not David Humme.
The complete title of the book is "A Discourse on Grants and Resumptions and Essays on the Balance of Power" (1701).
Hellyot (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essays on the Balance of Power 

message: No non-European balance of power examples?—67.180.86.254 (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the idea originated in Europe and most of the literature on the subject is from Europe then it is hardly surprising if most of the sources are from Europe or about Europe. Why don't you add some non-European examples?--Britannicus (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Job Being Eurocentric 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: What is balance of power and importance 197.186.61.148 (talk) 06:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance of power 

message: Game-theoretical perspectives, elation to MAD Elias (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing perspectives 

message: Most of the sources quoted in the article to suggest that the balance of power theory has fundamentally broken down post Cold War (or in the light of post Cold War events) was a wrong theory all along are 1990s or early 2000s. Vultur~enwiki (talk) 20:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there newer sources?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Roger Ambrose

message: I don't understand the complete deletion of this page. I am not trying to be a pest by re-submitting the article (it was all I knew how to do) I was not trying to be sneaky at all, I thought it was just an automated bot's deletion. 
I have communicated with all the other editors comments and guidelines to the best of my ability. I could use some help here. As I was seeing from all the other comments by editors, I was following or changing any suggestions being made.
Now, as a more familar user of wikipedia, I understand that in fact I should not have created this article myself. I tried to keep it as nutural as possible, but to give as much info on the subject as possible. I appreciate the notation to the IMDb listing on my work as a reason for my remaining on wikipedia.
Again if I am totally out of line, so be it. I will live with your rulings here, but would like a civil explaination. Thank you. R.Ambrose
::So we have a clash between policies. The fact that he was fast in recreating a deleted page (itself grounds for a speedy deletion) bothers me. The fact that this is vanity, itself grounds for deletion, bothers me. But Roger C. Ambrose is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (it should be disambiguated from two actors named Roger Ambrose). So how do we split this baby? Move this to Roger C. Ambrose (now a redirect page), make Roger Ambrose a disambiguation page, and state in no uncertain terms that such autobiographies are not permitted on Wikipedia. The advertising must be eliminated, too - and the awards section and everything with his web site address must go. B.Wind 21:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tone of this article also clearly demonstrates why, while not forbidden, autobiography is strongly discouraged in Wikipedia. An article written by a third party would not read like this. Fan1967 21:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion is not understood.
Talk:I Can Do Bad All by Myself (play)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose The play has received 7174 views and the film 26025 views over the last 90 days. So by that measure, one of many at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, it's not obvious that the play is primary. It's difficult to show that the play is more significant as there are no reliable sources cited in the article, nor has the nominator made such a case. Where there is no obvious primary topic the page I Can Do Bad All By Myself should become a disambiguation page. Tassedethe (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Madea movies are so great, funny and are the best
I think Tyler Perry should make New movies Banzo2 (talk) 00:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madea
Talk:Paul Jenkins (writer)

message: ==Untitled==
Should probably have some mention of his and Humberto's newest work. -130.232.150.17 (talk) 13:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fairy Quest

message: Should probably have some mention of his and Humberto's newest work. -130.232.150.17 (talk) 13:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Autonomic dysreflexia

message: Could really do with some explanantion of which type of discharge and what, for example, T10 means. Rockpocket 00:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could someone please break this article into sections according to the guidelines suggested at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28Medicine-related_articles%29#Diseases.2Fdisorders.2Fsyndromes?  It would be a big improvement for the readers.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Could someone please

message: While I have no empirical evidence, and therefore cannot make an addition to this article scientifically, I do personally know of a case in which sexual stimulation has induced AD in a patient with a high cervical lesion, which does support non-noxious stimulus as a potential AD trigger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.55.138 (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support for Non-Noxious Causes 

message: An article has recently been created, Mass reflex, that should redirect to this article. There's not really any content worth keeping there, so it should probably just be turned into a redirect. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mass reflex]] should redirect to this article 

message: — Assignment last updated by Leximed (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BioC 7210 - Wikipedia Editing for Health Care Professionals
Talk:Leave the gate as you found it

message: I'm not convinced this is an Australia specific rule, as opposed to one that applies the world over in non-urban areas.  The english Country Code has this as a rule, and an internet search shows the phrase being used in many U.S. publications.  Steve 00:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay! We should rewrite the article then. (I have a vague recollection from decades ago that rural Australians believed that English people had a tendency to close gates, but obviously that's wrong.) Do you have some URLs from your research? Cheers, CWC(talk) 02:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yesterday your article inspired me to rewrite The Country Code entry on the english rules, and, yes, your memory serves you well in that code originally said 'Fasten gates'!  It was revised to the Countryside Code in 2004 and that rule changed to 'leave gates as you find them.'  A Google of the phrase 'the gate as you found it' shows up on quite a few US and UK sites.  Not really sure how to proceed though.  Make your article more generic as the only worldwide applicable rule of the bush? Steve 03:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've had a go at "de-Aussieing" the article. Further edits and comments are welcome. Cheers, CWC(talk) 12:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Australia-specific

message: See also Chesterton’s Fence.
:Unrelated concept, link removed. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also [[G._K._Chesterton#Chesterton's_fence|Chesterton’s Fence]].
Talk:Backyard Wildlife Habitat

message: This article needs more inline citations. I added an editing banner.SpiritedMichelle (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources were already in the article.  I made them explicit and removed the tag. Viriditas (talk) 09:51, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More inline citations needed
Talk:Alan Canfora

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 18:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Classic example of WP:ONEEVENT. All information here is (or should be) at Kent State shootings. Adpete (talk) 11:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be deleted
Talk:Estadio Florencio Sola

message: why the the Copa Libertadores 2007 link appears strikethru ?
:Could you be a little bit more specific? What page is the link located at? Bjelleklang  -  talk 00:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the article does not yet exists. Mariano(t/c) 08:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chu Lai

message: this naming issue needs to be resolved. what is it, ju ly or kru lak, or neither? they both seem a bit of a stretch to me, especially a usmc general naming a place after himself!Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Civilian Irregular Defense Group program

message: Changed "Operation Switchblack" to "Operation Switchback. Here are my sources on the correct name:
*http://www.vietnamgear.com/dictionary/cidg.aspx
*http://ranger95.com/military_history/sf_vietnam/chap3_cidg_program.html
--DOHC Holiday (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Switchback 

message: The list of SF team members on the Buon Enao project were Cpt. Ron Shackleton, Msg John M. Slover as Team Sgt, Sfc Manfried Baier as Med Specialist, Sgt Lester Walkley as Communications Chief, Sgt William Betch as Communications Specialist, Sgt John Clark as Heavy Weapons Specialist, Charles Lindewald as light Weapons Specialist and Sp5 Alfred Warok as the Engineer Specialist.
Photo of MSG John M. Slover 
Ref: Village Defense –Initial Special Forces Operations in Vietnam. SBN: 0915222027
```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.2.240 (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buon Enao project 

message: This stub is a close paraphrase of the single source: http://www.history.army.mil/books/vietnam/90-23/90-231.htm. That alone obscures the fact that this account is from a vary well-defined and singular point of view.
That does not discount the chronologies, but the more political content, ex, the rendering of the 'success' of the operation and the reaction of the locals, enters the encyclopedia as propaganda.
For a different account of the initial program of the CIDG, the campaign at Buon Ea Nao. see Wilfred G. Burchett, "Vietnam. Inside Story of the Guerilla War." International Publishers Co, 1965. p156.
Actions recommended: I) Rewrite the paraphrase to show that it is such and directly site the source; or II) Remove evaluations of the operation to quoted and referenced material; and III) Add references to accounts of the operation from Burchett. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtweedles (talk • contribs) 11:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close paraphrase of single source 

message: I added a link for Operation Switchback. Not a military buff at all but following the wiki links to OS mentions, it seems it may deserve its own page. KRTKC (talk) 03:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Switchback 

message: What is the source for CIDG being spoken as "sid-gee"? In interviews with Vietnam veterans I've watched, they've spelled it out as C-I-D-G. 24.187.44.167 (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "sid-gee"?