Talk:SIG P210

message: There are some new pictures of the SIG 210 Legend in wikipedia commons if anybody is interested.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael E. Cumpston (talk • contribs) 15:30, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 

message: Would any of the primary contributors mind if I added a "Cultural impact" section, where some cases of P210's use in fiction as well as airsoft models styled after it would be mentioned? --Koveras ☭ 20:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:GUNS#Pop culture, also, past consensus states no talk of airsoft replicas, and most of the fictional uses are not notable enough to actually be worth having in an article.--LWF (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. :) --Koveras ☭ 08:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I've since fixed this, coincidentally using the same idea as yourself (splitting it into separate sentences). I've also stuck that paragraph into a new "history" section. It does leave one gap, though - the Luger is said to have left service in 1945 whilst the P210 entered service in 1949, which suggests that the Swiss army and police did not have a standard pistol between those years. We need to find a Swiss person, and pump him. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One firearms website says they regularly ship with test targets with 10 rounds in 2" at 50 meters.  That's almost certainly 9mm, but this is a detail that is seldom mentioned.Digitallymade (talk) 01:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural impact 

message: Impossible, if you open the breech, the extractor will pull out the cartridge. Picture should be kicked out. -- User:Hmaag  —Preceding undated comment added 10:27, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of opened breech of a Danish Army P210 

message: This article should probably mention that this pistol was used during the war in Afghanistan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.83.22.172 (talk) 11:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Afghanistan 

message: This page needs to be renamed to reflect the new name.Digitallymade (talk) 01:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sig P210 is NOW the Sig Sauer P210 

message: The ONLY SIG made handgun in history was the SIG P210.  This is NOT currently made. SIG has NO firearms business.  The SIG P210 design has been passed to Sig Sauer.  In January 2107 it was announced that Sig Sauer will start making the Sig Sauer P210 model.
There is NO Sig branded handguns made anywhere in the world today.
Every page on Wikipedia that lists a Sig xxxx as a title is incorrect.Digitallymade (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive numbers of errors concerning pages with Sig Sauer Handguns. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on SIG Sauer P210. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071119204325/http://larvatus.livejournal.com/33732.html to http://larvatus.livejournal.com/33732.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091225230132/http://larvatus.livejournal.com/182532.html to http://larvatus.livejournal.com/182532.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150401222220/http://larvatus.livejournal.com/355024.html to http://larvatus.livejournal.com/355024.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on SIG Sauer P210. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307044015/http://www.hjv.dk/HHV/TFRK/HHD%20NORDSJ%C3%86LLAND/HVK%20SSR/materiel-udrustning-vaaben/Sider/pistol.aspx to http://www.hjv.dk/HHV/TFRK/HHD%20NORDSJ%C3%86LLAND/HVK%20SSR/MATERIEL-UDRUSTNING-VAABEN/Sider/pistol.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206041222/http://www.kesslerauktionen.ch/Verkauf/Zubehor/Allgemein/208859/Leseprobe.pdf to http://www.kesslerauktionen.ch/Verkauf/Zubehor/Allgemein/208859/Leseprobe.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006123319/http://www.lba.admin.ch/internet/lba/de/home/themen/pers0/bewaffnung/pist49.html to http://www.lba.admin.ch/internet/lba/de/home/themen/pers0/bewaffnung/pist49.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: "SIG Sauer P210" is a misnomer for the miliary pistol, which was produced prior to the acquisition of SIG by Sauer & Son.
The article should be named "SIG P210".
"SIG Sauer P210" may be a proper designation for the new models produced from 2010 (or from 2017), although it should be noted that 
it is not called that by SIG Sauer, the models are called "P210 Standard" (or "210A-9-B") and "P210 Target" (or "210A-9-TGT") on the sigsauer.com website.
From this I deduce that the new model should properly be called "SIG Sauer P210A" for disambiguation with the historical models. And this is what I appear to find in expert usage.
--dab (𒁳) 12:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thank you for making this change. "SIG Sauer P210" (or some variation in line with SIG Sauer's own nomenclature) may be appropriate either as a subheading in this article or perhaps as the title of a separate article, but it is not the principal subject of this article. João Do Rio (talk) 04:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: So,
The P210 is "derived" from the 1935A, because it uses the "Petter-Browning system" that Petter designed for his pistol. However, the 1935A uses an unmodified Browning-System with a pivoting chain link. The P210 does not. Instead, the P210 uses the Browning-FN-System that was introduced in the Browning Hi-Power. It's main difference is that the pivoting chain-link is replaced with a linkless cam design.
To summarize: Neither the P210 nor the 1935A use this mystrious "Petter-Browning system". In fact, the two pistols use different lock-up mechanisms althogether. 
The only thing the two pistols share is the concept of an integrated fire control system, that Petter used and patended. The Soviet TT-33 used a similiar system, mind you. This is hardly enough to justify the claim that the P210 is "derived" from the 1935A. At best, it's a footnote. 195.176.99.147 (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SIG P210 vs Petter 1935A