Talk:Cat coat genetics

message: Wouldn't it be better to explain the Orange/Black genes with better terms than O and o. The way I learned it was X^O and X^B. That way it showed it was on the X chromosome and that it was incomplete dominance. - not signed
:O and o are the standard terms used among cat breeders. We're not making the terms up, we're reporting them. - Nunh-huh 00:25, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: The white spotting gene does not affect eye colour in cats.  The colourpoint genes are the genes responsible for creating the blue eyes in cats.  Snowshoes, Ragdolls and Birmans are examples of cats that have (or can have) the white spotting gene (ss) and the colourpoint (cscs) gene.  The blue eyes comes from the colourpoint not the white spotting so it seems misleading to have a paragraph about ss and then talk about blue eyes.  Is it okay for me to go ahead and change this?  
Cuddleton (talk) 08:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: White Spotting Gene

message: The article haa been tagged for a year, but there ARE sources at the bottom of the page. Should I go ahead and remove? Kuronue 15:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the strength of these sources, I'd say go ahead.--Ramdrake 15:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: : Breeders usually find it useful to identify and separate cats with tabby genes ...
Why is such separation useful?  —Tamfang 03:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  useful separation? 

message: I was expecting this term to be mentioned, at least. Eroica 11:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maltese dilution? 

message: I suggest that Bicolor cat and Tortoiseshell cat be merged into this article as both pages rely heavily on information found in this page. Repeating information about cat genetics in different articles is redundant, and I believe all of the articles could be simplified and made more cohesive if they were all placed together.Kpstewart (talk) 02:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bicolor cat is too long for a subsection, imho. —Tamfang (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Agreed with —Tamfang --6th Happiness (talk) 18:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree too long to go here Telecine Guy 18:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I have two genetics-newbie questions that aren't answered by this article.  First, why do housecats display such a wide variety of colours and coat patterns when, e.g., lions do not?  Second, I read somewhere that the pattern of spots on cats' coats is related to circumstances in the mother's womb while the kitten is developing.  I've heard that as an explanation for why even cloned cats do not precisely resemble one another.  Is there a word for that scientific concept?  --Hapax (talk) 19:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If I can reverse your first question, why do lions display only one coat color and pattern? Because there is evolutionary pressure to develop characteristics that assist them as predators, and among those characteristics is a coat that helps them not obviously stand out against the background of the veldt.  The occasional snow white lion doesn't do well as a hunter, dies early, and doesn't reproduce (if lions had predators, such a lion would be more prone to being killed as well). The housecat, though, is domesticated; by "adopting" it as our own, humans have more or less eliminated natural selection as the driver of their evolution and replaced it with our own breeding choices. And among the choices that we've made is that we like our cats in a variety of colors and hair lengths and patterns, and we've bred them specifically for that variety. As for the second question, while the general pattern and color of coats is genetically determined, the specific implementation of that pattern depends on environment and chance; it's that way with most traits. I think it's likely that pattern in particular is more happenstance than any specific womb-related variables. - Nunh-huh 02:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you very much for your informative answer.  I would like to know more about the 'environment and chance' variables that lead to the placement of spots or stripes on an animal's body.  If you can suggest a place to look, either here on Wikipedia or elseweb, that will teach me about that, I'd be much obliged.  I don't even know what to Google.  --Hapax (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions 

message: I take a degree of issue with the assertion :"Orange cats with the inhibitor gene (I-O-) are commonly called "cameo".
Surely red silver tabby is also I-O and I-O-aa is a red smoke. So how do we distinguish red silver tabby and cameo - are they both I-O-A?
Can we agree on what a cameo is? is it agouti or non-agouti and what are the non-agouti cameos really? poorly marked smokes? is a red shaded cameo distinguishable from a red mackerel tabby? does cameo deserve a page of its own?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Excellentone (talk • contribs) 20:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nit-pick: Don't use "USA" in article prose, per MOS:ABBR.  Use "US" or "United States".  Less of a nit-pick: Trying to make this sound like a WP:ENGVAR issue is not very accurate or helpful. TICA is not US-only (the I stands for "International").  I don't know if CFA is UK-only. And there's the WCF now. These are principally , not matters of national dialect vocabulary; the fancier/breeder orgs. made up these terms for the most part, and only the most basic ones like "tabby" come from the language outside of these orgs.  Where each org. has its HQ is not tremendously relevant in matters like this. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ  Contrib.  05:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameo  

message: This article badly needs work. It does not even begin to explain terms like smoke and shaded, for example.  It also misses that CFA uses the term parti-color (British parti-colour) instead of tortoiseshell.  And lots of other stuff.  For starters, the information at Cats and humans#Coat patterns needs to be merged into Cat coat genetics, because a) much of it is missing here, and b) it's not really directly relevant in that level of detail to the article it is presently in. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ  Contrib.  05:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I Agree with this merge proposal.  That is not material directly relevant to Cats and humans, any more than discussing the skin colors of humans would be relevant. Agricolae (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Agree with merge: I realise I am late to the party but am working on these cat articles today; especially behaviour and colours. The merge of the above named section on coat patterns into this article would be profitable and sensible.  Fylbecatulous talk 16:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposed 

message: So, does this mean that the smilodon's fur coat was probably white?
2600:8800:8880:6A60:B4C2:D910:C557:20AD (talk) 11:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smilodon 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cat coat genetics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070504111601/http://cc.ysu.edu/~helorime/BasicCol.html to http://cc.ysu.edu/~helorime/BasicCol.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120411072901/http://f1hybrids.com/silver-savannah-cats/ to http://f1hybrids.com/silver-savannah-cats/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Re the citation needed. The Schmidt-Küntzel et al (2009) reference has a brief comment addressing this:  The Moran abstract is suggests several mechanisms for the male tortoiseshell, not all of which are sterile. Unfortunately, I can't access the full text of the reference.   Jts1882 | talk  15:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks worth integrating more directly.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  16:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male tortoiseshells 

message: I've just updated the pink cat article, which until yesterday said that pink cats didn't exist in nature then blithely included two photos captioned as pink cats. From skimming sources it seems like it might be fair to say that a "red cameo" cat could be regarded as having a pinkish colour, but this may be the confirmation-bias thing of asking the entire depths of Google Books whether anyone, however incorrectly, has ever described a cat as pink. Can I get a second opinion from someone who knows about cat colours? --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, a red cameo cat does not look pink or pinkish. Neither does cream or apricot cameo. Those colors tend to be either red or orange in hue. The only pink cats I have ever heard of or seen were either fictitious, or dyed somehow.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Edit: Just remembered, certain (highly uncommon) colors may appear to have a pinkish tint. Specifically, cinnamon-based caramel is described as a "pinkish-brown" according to . But that is also incredibly rare, and not actually pink.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 13:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pink cats 

message: *I suspect that the Siamese gene is a mutation of the gene that makes fever coat, that brings the fever coat critical temperature down a few degrees, so that fever coat develops at ordinary non-fever cat blood temperature. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siamese cats and fever coat 

message: The one-gene theory of tabby previously put forth by Kaelin et. al (2006) was conclusively overturned by Eizirik et. al in 2010 - that paper is also cited as proving that spotted tabby is polygenic.
I am also highly skeptical of the claim that cats homozygous for the ticked allele show no leg, neck, and tail banding - studies "proving" this seem to use exclusively Abyssinians, a breed required to have little to no residual banding, and don't account for the possibility of it being polygenic. Furthermore, I've yet to see a cat like this outside of the few breeds where the ticked pattern is required to be clear, or crosses thereof. Many breeds - Maine Coons, for example - have ticked tabbies that are presumably bred to each other, but they seem to have yet to produce a ticked with no leg and neck striping. Unfortunately, people have been relying on this assumption from a 1988 paper that has otherwise been thoroughly disproved.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparrowsgarden (talk • contribs) 04:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabby Genes and Alleles 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :White spotting gene and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 28#White spotting gene until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "White spotting gene" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :White Coat Pattern and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 28#White Coat Pattern until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "White Coat Pattern" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I flagged a couple of citations to the MessyBeast blog as unreliable for genetic and veterinary information, because that's just some random non-expert's personal blog. It may be popular due to marketing, but it is not an RS for this sort of material.
However, I'm seeing a lot of other dubious sources in there that appear to be more blogs, UGC, and/or clickbait content sites.  This really needs a top-to-bottom review of the sourcing.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources