lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mummification (BDSM)

message: That's completely ridiculous, sorry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.201.132 (talk) 23:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: This is the first article to come up when typing Mummification into the search field

message: bodyhose.com is a dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.136.160.65  (talk • contribs) 02:50, 15 January 2006
Sadly, I figured out that "the bottom" was a inside-term by the time I scanned the article to the bottom.  It's not defined and everybody has one.  Far too much restraint.  See Cellular pathology for further inspiration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxEnt  (talk • contribs) 02:16, 8 June 2006
I see weasel words here. ForestAngel 22:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone else find these girls absolutely gorgeous? Where do fetishists find these people?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.190.127 (talk) 08:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos in this article

message: I pared the article down, but even what is left still needs sources, it just had less severe problems with WP:NOTAMANUAL, WP:EDITORIAL ("notice"), and Wikipedia:No original research.  Please find Wikipedia:Reliable sources for this article and any statements you wish to add; information needs WP:Verification. Шизомби (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article problems
Talk:EMD GP38AC

message: The first GP38ACs were Illinois Central 9500-9519 in February 1970. See http://community-1.webtv.net/ajkristopans/40SERIES/ for production dates. --SSW9389 (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First units 

message: I count at least 94 GP38AC's being used by Norfolk Southern as cores for creating GP40-2's, GP22ECO's, GP38-2's, and RP-E4C slugs. They've been an attractive core candidate for rebuilding thanks to their AR10 alternator. The vast majority of these rebuilds from the 2000's and 2010's remain rostered by NS and the few that have sold have been resold for reuse and haven't been scrapped.
A couple of other rusting and long stored GP38AC's remain on NS property. And most of the small number left remaining unrebuilt from the 116 GP38AC's from these two fleets were sold off and remain active today on shortlines. Same applies for the four ex CR GP38AC's that NS inherited, with all four being used as cores for creating new GP38-2's during the 2000's (Although at least one has been sold and now works for the Indiana Harbor Belt in the wake of the slimming down of the roster that came with Hunter Harrison, Precision Scheduled Railroading, etc.) 2603:7081:C02:5700:C037:46A:3956:E409 (talk) 11:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Southern/N&W GP38AC's weren't scrapped
Talk:EMD GP39

message: You have the GP39DCs covered twice. The 23 GP39s are C&O 3900-3919; Atlanta & Saint Andrews Bay 507 and Kennecott Copper 1-2. --SSW9389 (talk) 12:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It took 13 years, but the duplication has finally been addressed with a merger of the GP39DC article into this article! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  DC versions 

message: Please see this edit for more information--ForgottenHistory (talk) 00:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The article EMD GP39DC is covering a nearly identical variant of the GP39, of which only two were ever produced. It is unlikely the GP39DC page will ever advance beyond a stub because there is very little information specific to the GP39DC. I believe it would be better to merge the GP39DC into this article, so everything is in one place. Additionally, another editor has asserted that the GP39DC article is a duplicate as the two locomotives are also included in this page. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:Godzilla Raids Again

message: Does anyone know anything about the Australian release of this movie? I.e. its date of release and the name it was released under. I can't have seen it in 1956, but I have a faint childhood memory of it being in some cinemas, presumably some years later and perhaps not on its intitial release here. I thought it was called The Fire Monsters at that time, rather than Gigantis the Fire Monster. Is anyone old enough (or does anyone maybe have parents old enough and interested enough) to have a clear memory of this? :) Metamagician3000 03:18, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: has anyone ever heard of the volcano monsters it was the original intention of the american version but the suits for the two dinosaurus were lost so they had to try and re-make it should this be meanchoned AN UNMADE VERSION! 71.208.62.88 (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The volcano monsters 

message: What kind of "missiles" are JSDF pilots firing into mountains in 1955? The US and USSR were only just developing the very first generations of guided air-to-air missiles around this time (exclusively for aerial combat, not ground attack), and it seems unlikely that they would be in service in the JSDF, or a part of the wider Japanese social consciousness yet. The first combat use of the Sidewinder was in 1958, production started in 1955. And that was one of the very first aerial missiles in service.
Unguided rockets, however were in their heyday as aerial and air-to-ground weapons in the 1950s, and I suspect that is what is depicted in the film.
64.223.92.229 (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missiles?
Talk:Von Ryan's Express

message: Why do all the names appear again at the top of the page? It looks terrible. Bhumiya 03:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: The article states...
"Ryan then has to reluctantly shoot Gabriella as she escapes, to prevent her betraying them."
This is incorrect. Ryan does not shoot Gabriella. She is shot by someone else (exactly who is unknown but most probably one of the fake German soldiers guarding the train).
I have just watched this scene. The girl is shot by Ryan. It is clearly visible. There is no other gunfire. Reference the later dialogue "I'm sorry it had to be you with the girl" said by Trevor Howard's character to Ryan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.168.46 (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gabriella was not shot by Ryan 

message: I fixed the John van Dreelen link in the cast link with a minor change, but wanted to note it here as well.  His name is a bit tricky.  IMDb lists him with the "v" capitalized and then notes exceptions in his filmography (including Von Ryan's Express).  At least a third of his films have him listed with some variation on his name.  Wikipedia lists him with the "v" in lower case letters and that's how I've changed it here.  The website dedicated to him seems to concur.  JimVC3 (talk) 23:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John van Dreelen 

message: I am interested in how these men managed to escape the Swiss authorities. One of my relatives escaped up through Italy at about the same time as this event took place. He was put into a Swiss prison camp, where he remained for over a year. How come the people in this film got away with it in Switzerland? Why were they not interned too?  Wallie (talk) 09:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A querstion 

message: John Van Dreelan's character Gortz, the SS commander, is the one who kills Frank Sinatra. For some reason this was changed back to it just being an anonymous German. I think the guy who kills the main character ought to be identified by name. Kooshmeister (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I may have been the one who changed it most recently, simply because I was not paying attention to what I was doing.  That was my error.  Fact is, I can no longer remember for sure what happened in the film, but I will take your word for it. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standartenführer Gortz 

message: The article suggests that the whole film was shot in Panavision. Although the cited source, note 8, says, 'We're told that Frank Sinatra insisted on Panavision lenses, for his own scenes at least' (which does not sound very credible for technical reasons), the film's opening credits say it's in CinemaScope. Khamba Tendal (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CinemaScope
Talk:Rakfisk

message: This is my first article on wikipedia, please feel free to add more info or correct the article if you feel that someting is missing..--Njård 03:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is developing well, and that is a very nice photo. I used it to illustrate lefse also, since that article lacked an image. Jonathunder 03:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rakfisk

message: When people first started eating it, rakfisk was controversial.
This badly needs some verification. How can anyone know this? Does Snorri mention it? The Sagas? Fermented fish is probably several thousand years old, and fermentation of many kinds of food has always been and still is a very common food preservation method in the Northern lands. Devanatha (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: Vinegar?  Traditional Scandinavian cooking in general and Norwegian cooking in particular is famous for not using vinegar at all, and very few acids.  The first "Eddik" for human consumption wasn't even sold in Norway until 1930.  I am fairly certain that washing the fish out with vinegar is a new or imported invention, intended to increase safety.  The oldest recipe I could find for rakefisk (in Schønberg-Erken's Kogebog, 1921) calls for a brine made with salt and sugar, but has no mentioning of any acid treatment.
65.75.16.254 (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recipe
Talk:Sosiaalisesti rajoittuneet

message: This article has been suggested for removal. And after debate the decision was Keep. So when can the notice be taken off fronm the main page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.234.247.50 (talk) 17:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never. Archived AfD discussions are permanently noted on talk pages. They do not appear on the articles themselves. JIP | Talk 20:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When AfD notice can be removed? 

message: It makes absolutely no sense to have this on the English wiki.  I am putting a tag on the article page.--Mynameisnotpj (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:EMD GP39-2

message: Removing this gibberish. They didn't have a customized cab with a higher point of view because the road had "high clearance". Not a lick of sense in that quote. As is plainly obvious it was done to improve visibility for the crew, in this case when operating in the Bingham open pit copper mine. Sure, generous clearance limits made it possible. But the quote is portraying it as the reason behind the customized cabs which not only is incorrect, but devoid of any logic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:C02:5700:64E1:EEAD:934B:A1F4 (talk) 06:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, I dislike "notes" sections, as they tend to accumulate cruft and nonsense, such as what you just removed. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Several given high cabs for high clearance" 

message: The total for Kennecott was 31 locomotives. 28 with the unique high-cab and three standard-cab locomotives.
Kennecott 705-711 (7 units) delivered in 1980
Kennecott 779-789 (11 units) delivered in 1977
Kennecott 790-799 (10 units) delivered in 1978
Kennecott 905 (1 unit) delivered in 1976 (standard cab)
Kennecott SM-1 and SM-2 (2 units) delivered in 1981 (standard cab; later Kennecott 101 and 102)
There was no GP39-2 numbered #3 for Kennecott, as the page claims.
https://utahrails.net/bingham/kcc-utah-locos-index.php 2603:7081:C02:5700:E195:778D:35A1:CD8D (talk) 04:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kennecott
Talk:EMD GP40

message: I know that at least one of the VRE RP39-2C's is still in use. It is cute being used by Utah Transit Authority's FrontRunner as a yard switcher.
Are there any others that are still being used?
Does anyone know what the "RP" stands for? FrontrunnerJake (talk) 10:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RP39-2C 

message: Can someone more experienced with locomotives and rolling stock take a shot at fixing the broken table? I looked at it but it's unclear which railways the notes refer to, e.g. "3024, 3085, 3176 were wrecked and retired in the 70s". -- Julius177 (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken table 

message: should include mention of GP40 & GP40-2 mother slug sets
https://www.3blmedia.com/news/norfolk-southern-sustainability-locomotive-rebuilds Jcody21 (talk) 23:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Rebuilds section
Talk:Bill Nighy

message: In the main dialogue it says he's "12 December 1949" but in the sidebar it says "born 12 January 1949". Most sites say the former so I'm editing and citing my source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedoctor98 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: Bill Nighy stars in Florence + the Machine's "Free" video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui8kUKuLBaU .  Wasn't sure how or where to add this.  Mentioning it here in case someone else might know how to do so.  My apologies if for some reason this was broached before and purposefully not included here. --Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 05:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florence + The Machine's Free video 

message: He has played Charles Paris on radio many times. These are fantastically un-sober theatrical whodunnnits written by Simon Brett and are quite marvellous!
I have no idea why this has not been included in the Wiki article! Eurgain (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Paris on BBC
Talk:Frevo

message: * Pernambucan is not a English word. The term should be "the carnaval of Pernambuco". ClaudioMB 03:38, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
* The entire page needs to be rewritten. The English is atrocious.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.177.6 (talk) 04:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "a working class dialectal": pure ignorance and discrimination. -- 201.69.46.238 10:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrimination
Talk:Sector

message: Sectors of economy are three  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4053:D96:5ED4:0:0:2408:580B (talk) 12:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

message: This page does not comply with the new Wikipedia:Manual of style (disambiguation pages). Pgan002 03:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following major changes, with reasoning.  Not every change is noted here.
* dictionary definition of sector removed; this is handled by the Wiktionary entry
* image associated with circular sector removed as unnecessary detail for a disambiguation page
* economics related terms: a new article, List of recognized economic sectors, was created to support revision of this line item.
* removed because I could not find reference to this in Formula One-related articles (re-add if you can identify a cross-reference): "In Formula One, a sector is a section of the track defined for timing purposes. There are usually 2 or 3 sectors on a track"
* removed political science section as redundant to the economics section
:--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page cleanup
Talk:Webjay

message: I am the Slashdot commenter mentioned in the article.  I hereby grant Wikipedia the right to republish my comment.  J nachlin (talk) 22:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Enlarged the XSPF section.  
Lucas gonze (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits April 19, 2008 

message: I enlarged the article from a stub.  Some of my additions include quotes from non-public-domain sources, which I believe are under the de minimus bar for quoting without permission.  The quote from the Webjay copyright policy is in the public domain.  
I added my name to the article, since the article on my name redirects here and not having my name in the article is confusing.
Lucas gonze (talk) 04:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits April 18, 2008 

message: Robert 03:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep
Talk:Evergreen, Missouri

message: The village of Twin Brigdes has changed its name to Evergreen.  I do not know when, but I was through there today and the Missouri Department of Transportation has changed the signs and the city hall has "Evergreen" on it, so it is official (though I can't find anything about it anywhere on the internet).Rt66lt 03:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change
Talk:Fashion cigarettes

message: Should a namechange be warranted, 'premium' or 'luxury' might be better suited. Chris 03:48, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I have been seeing a cigarette with a beige or light tan wrapper. Does anyone know what this is? Chris 15:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: beige or tan cigarette

message: This article states that cigarettes were historically seen as masculine.  This is false.  The cigarette came about as a feminine tobacco product, a feminization of the cigar.  Thus the "ette".  Cigarettes may have later become masculinized.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.101.69 (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historically
Talk:Project Galileo

message: By way of supporting this entry - as this project is completely non-profit and the co-ordinator runs the occasional open evening for local Bristolians (obviously by invitation only as it's in a school!) I would have thought that this was a good place to provide some useful background info for those who might want to know more. Mercury543210 23:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Value to Bristol

message: Many thanks to all who've improved this page.  I am intending to update it with more technical information about how the system works, along with references in line with the aims of Wikipedia.  The final article should end up being useful for the new Twenty First Century Science course that is being rolled out across the UK. Thanks to all those who've voted to keep the article - I'll endeavor to improve its quality.
Dez Futak 18:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from original author
Talk:EMD GP50

message: I've added info from an article I found in Mainline Modeler regarding the GP50's history. Can the single-source label be cleared? Autonerd (talk) 06:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for massively improving the article. However, almost everything in the page is sourced to the _Mainline Modeler_ article, so the single source tag is entirely appropriate. (Before your edit, the article should have been tagged as unsourced, not single-sourced.) Dricherby (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer single source
Talk:Bangkok Hilton

message: Any info regarding the Hilton Hotels Corporation allowing its (persumably) trademarked name used in a movie title? --Kvasir 03:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hilton Hotels Corporation]]

message: Does anyone know if the nickname Bangkok Hilton was ever in use for any actual Bangkok prison prior to this work, or did this work invent that nickname. Ever since this series, news reports and TV documentaries usually seem pretty keen to describe whichever Bangkok prison they are reporting on (be it Chang Mai, Bangkwang, Klong Prem) as having the nickname "Bangkok Hilton". Now, the same nickname can't really be applied to three different places can it? Also, book The Damage Done uses only nickname "Big Tiger" to describe the Bangkwang prison, there is no mention of any "Bangkok Hilton" nickname. Asa01 20:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what you're alluding to is correct. I've recently been looking for an answer to the same question and only see the term being used by the (mainly Australian) media in recent times and in reference to any and every Thai prison. -- Ian ≡ talk 00:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Google News Archive http://news.google.com/archivesearch reveals no articles prior to 1989 using "Bangkok Hilton" in reference to a Bangkok prison. Format (talk) 07:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The term ‘The Hilton’ or the ‘Such-and-such Hilton’, used to describe lock-ups, cheap rooming houses, unsavoury hostels or even low-class share-houses has been in use in Australian youth culture since at least the '60s. I'm unsure whether this is an Australianism or not; I have been unable to find any examples from other countries. The term is common enough to have influenced the producers, but it is also true that Thai prisons may have been referred to as the ‘Bangkok Hilton’ among Australian backpackers. 124.170.18.247 (talk) 04:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a 41 year old Australian and have never heard this usage ever, and have never even heard of it - not even on Australian TV drama or in movies. I figured the writer of this miniseries was inspired by Hanoi Hilton actually. Format (talk) 08:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Title question
Talk:Video Option

message: Robert 04:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 
Talk:Bearded axe

message: Thanks for the article, Sherlock. --Isequals 04:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Descriptive 

message: I have cited Jan Petersen's classic text on Viking weaponry in the stub.
Page 38 of that text shows photos of remains of Viking bearded axes, however I do not have the skill to copy and paste them into Wikipedia as yet.
Perhaps a kind editor could undertake this task.William of Aragon (talk) 23:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Citation
Talk:Where the Buffalo Roam (webcomic)

message: Note I've updated the banner above and made some article edits. A quick trawl through alt.comics.buffalo-roam yields:
* oldest message Google has is Apr 14 1992; and Herb announces the start of posting (so not 1991)
**Subject: Daily comic strip comming to alt.comics.buffalo-roam
* a December 1992 post gives ISBN:0-9627570-0-4 for the book by Hans Bjordahl
* between May and October 1992 the group seemed relatively quiet and by early 1993 it appeared no new comics were being posted
-Wikianon 18:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hans Bordahl says: "In 1991, Where the Buffalo Roam become the Internet's first regularly updated comic strip, when it was scanned and posted daily to its own USENET newsgroup..." --Dragonfiend 04:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: The Internet is a specific network, on which the World Wide Web is provided. CompuServe and other online services did not initially use it, and so can be considered separate from it. Therefore this can still be called the first known Internet comic strip, as mentioned in various published reliable sources. GreenReaper (talk) 03:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just came here to discuss that. Since you agree, I'm going to go ahead and change it. Phasma Felis (talk) 08:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between "online service" and "Internet"
Talk:Connotea

message: Robert 04:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 
Talk:EMD GP60

message: Hello, 
It is unclear to me if the addition of the totals line in the origional owners table is part of best practice or is considered vandalism so I have added a question about it to the Wiki Trains style guide talk page linked below. If you have any insight, please let me know over there!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Style advice#Addition of Totals to Rolling Stock or Motive Power Tables Jcody21 (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of Totals to Ownership Table