lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rivière-des-Prairies–Pointe-aux-Trembles

message: C'est au sujet de la légende de la deuxiéme photo. Il me semble impossible d'avoir une vue du St-Laurent à partir du "Nord" ou de quelque endroit de Rivière-des-Prairies.
Et compte tenu de la largeur apparente du cours d'eau, ce serait une image de la rivière des Prairies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.239.68.41 (talk) 17:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Second photo caption

message: Someone should consider cleaning up the grammer in this article. 76.71.208.11 (talk) 01:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Banged Up Abroad

message: Locked Up Abroad TV series seems to simply be series Banged Up Abroad re-broadcast for United States audiences under a new title. If they are the same program, only one article is needed on the program. Format (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Merge]] ''[[Locked Up Abroad]]'' into ''[[Banged Up Abroad]]''
Talk:Intellectual responsibility

message: I am creating this article as a tiny stub, in the hope that (a) an article with the title should exist, (b) no completely outlandish  claims are contained therein, and (c) it will provide a placeholder for further expansion by those in the know. (a) is substantiated by googling. --Dan Polansky 17:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on creation
Talk:Thomas Coningsby, 1st Earl Coningsby

message: The article says that Lord Conningsby sat for Leominster until he had his British peerage, but the succession box (which I have nased on the Leominster (UK Parliament constituency) article suggests a two year gap.  Can some one reolve this contradiction?  I have just changed "English peerage" to "British" for accuracy, but am reluctant insert the qualifier "almost" which would solve the problem without clear authority for this.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: peerage
Template talk:Indigenous peoples by continent

message: The intent of the Template:Indigenous peoples by continent is to easily navigate this vast and diverse topic, thus simply  links to groups by regions of the world regardless  if it is the correct political terminology.
:For a more extensive list see: List of indigenous peoples (Parent List)
The WIKI links  in the Template:Indigenous peoples by continent are for peoples who many be regarded as ethnic groups or the first humans of a geographic region, with which they are the earliest known cultural historical inhabitants, thus qualify under the Templates definition.
:See all pages that link to the  "Template:Indigenous peoples by continent"
:For a discussion of Inclusion criteria see: Talk:List of indigenous peoples
Buzzzsherman (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We haven't (sadly) got a definition for the indigenous peoples for Europe. Are they sub-national ethnic peoples with their own language ? Goths were definitely European for a long time, but the great mirgations mixed them up. Maybe they overthrew some Celts in France and destroyed some more ancient Roman peoples (Etruscans). There's so much history that it is difficult, on occasion (even if nationalism is thrown overboard), to tell who are the original people of the area (and where the 'center' of a large people has been prior the expansion. Basques definitely fit in every definition, Sami as well, Celts (who possibly overthrew the Picts) possibly, etc... Maybe it could link to :Category:Indigenous_peoples_of_Europe ? 88.195.46.112 (talk) 18:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Indigenous peoples of Europe article takes care of this issue.  It states that "there is no universal, standard or fixed definition".  It still deals with the topic and is the most appropriate link for this template. Neelix (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

message: This template should be about continents. Since how long the Arctic is a continent, and South and North America one continent? FonsScientiae (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a reversal is best as we now have now have 2  links to  the Americans (one is a redirect) and no link to Circumpolar Arctic. The current version does not solve  the original concern as the "Oceania" is also not a content. Will wait 2 days before reverting and moving template to "Indigenous peoples by geographic region".Moxy (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the Continent article. The same region which here is called "Oceania" is the continent "Australia" which encompasses the country of Australia, New Zealand, New Guinea, and all the various islands in the Pacific Ocean. The article of Indigenous peoples of the Americas, Indigenous peoples of Europe, and Indigenous peoples of Asia contain indigenous people of the Artic circle and again it is not a continent as the name of the template says. FonsScientiae (talk) 20:50, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct - all is fine my fault sorry.Moxy (talk) 21:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad we reached consensus FonsScientiae (talk) 21:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continents
Talk:Napoleonic French soldiers

message: This article is under construction. Please help me make it one of wiki.'s best Articles!!
This article is to specify the life and death of a French napoleonic solider. it is also to talk about the French Napoleonic marine and infantry. Like recruitment, pay, medical care, camp life, etc. This to be more specific than the Article on La Grande Armée.--Philippe Auguste 17:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds fun, but I think we should rename the article to "Napoleonic army", it will cover more stuff. Tourskin (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice!
Talk:WSUS (FM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a software update service is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the Windows Server Update Services. - Dravecky (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :WSUS and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 17#WSUS until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Joseph2302 (talk) 12:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WSUS" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sawi people

message: I understand that this is a small group, but surely there is a better source for them than "Peace Child"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.103.119.12 (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

message: Too much emphasis is put on this people's "cannibalistic headhunter" history and their conversion to Christianity. Emphasizing their supposed backwards in the second sentence, only to follow that up by trumpeting about missionary activities converting them to Christianity, with almost no other information about their culture or way of life. It's highly Eurocentric, Christian-centric, and minimizing of their culture. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 06:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased
Talk:King of the Ring (1998)

message: The bracket is wrong. It says The Rock was pinned by vader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamGallagherWright (talk • contribs) 20:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checking it now, I see no problems. NiciVampireHeart 01:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bracket 

message: It seems highly unnecessary for 1998 Hell in a Cell match to have its own page. This one isn't even long and barely mentions the match. There's no reason why the page can't be merged here. -- Scorpion0422 15:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. There have also been quite a few notable TV matches. Angle and Benoit's insane RAW cage match, Angle and Lesnar's SmackDown Iron Man, Angle vs Jannetty. And PPV ones like Angle vs Joe for every belt, the Eurocontinental Triple Threat at WrestleMania and the WWF Title match at No Mercy 2000. Everything Angle touches, basically, becomes gold. Of course, other people feel the same about Sting, Undertaker or Mantaur. Slippery slope, for sure. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from 1998 Hell in a Cell match

message: There has been a discussion about this already, but I think the subject deserves to be reopened. The Hell in a Cell match with Undertaker and Mankind has been called on of the most memorable matches in all of professional wrestling history, I think it is well deserving of it having its own page. It's one of the most watched matches in history that contains some of the most memorable falls anyone who watches the sport has ever seen, and it generated controversy and criticism, but also has been hailed alike. --Matt723star (talk) 22:36, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate page for Undertaker vs. Mankind Hell in a Cell match
Template talk:Miscegenation in Spanish colonies

message: why do you have a template for Miscegenation in Spanish colonies and Not one for Portuguese??? As far as I been told the Portuguese had MANY and very complex Miscegenation terms (like more than 20 it's been rumored as "black" people categorized themselves separately from other blacks due to skin stone) during their colonial times and I'm quite interested to learn on that history and the meaning of each word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.239.108 (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This template shows how the ethnicities are related, hence it is supposed to facilitate navigation through the articles that comprise this topic. ♠TomasBat 23:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's the Portuguese

message: :Commons:Category:Casta paintings -- AnonMoos (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Related Commons category
Category talk:Adult Swim original programming

message: The renaming of this category assumes that all of the shows in that category are original programing of Adult Swim and/or Cartoon Network.  This is not the case.  Some of the programs on Adult Swim (and in the previously named category) are not original programming.  This should have been taken into consideration before the article as renamed.  Further, IMHO, the category renaming process should include a post to the talk page of each article in that category (something easily done by a bot).  Most users keep individual articles in their watchlist, not the thousands of category pages that their collective articles may fall into.  Has this been done, the current issue might have been avoided.  ++Arx Fortis 17:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I am in the process of removing the programs that were not original to Adult Swim. I have removed about a third of the inappropriately categorized articles. Please feel free to help with the removal. Otto4711 18:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *Actually, I agree with Otto's rationale for the rename nomination:  "the networks or channels to which a TV show is syndicated is not a defining characteristic of the show. Could lead to programs being categorized in dozens of different categories."  The fact that the rename ended up with some articles that were no longer applicable to the new category was also discussed.  --Kbdank71 18:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *As for the CFD process of whether or not to add a notice to every article in the category, I believe this was already discussed, although for the life of me I can't remember where or when.  I think it came down to it wasn't a good idea.  I'll see if I can find the discussion.  --Kbdank71 18:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I believe that all of the non-original programming articles have now been removed. Otto4711 18:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *I supported the rename exactly so the non-original programming would be removed; that rationale was clearly stated in the proposal and a clear aim of the new name.  Postdlf 03:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with the renaming of this category
Talk:Herbie Flowers

message: I met Herbie in the 1990s when he was doing a one man show at the Edinburgh Festival. He told me he was never credited with the famous Pink Panther baseline which he demonstrated to Henry Mancini in a session. All he received was a £20 session fee! 51.6.139.112 (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PINK PANTHER BASELINE
Talk:Peter Thorup

message: I can't find one on the Danish Wikipedia article for him, nor can I find one through Google...--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK one found.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find me a reliable source stating his death.
Talk:O'Keeffe

message: The original O'Keefe's of Australia imigrated to south Australia in the 1850's abourd 2 ships (Lord Hungerford and the Caucasian). They are listed as Keefe's. Over the years the Thomas Keefe line of the family has re-adopted the name O'Keefe. I am a direct decendant. Hugo, Hugo, John, John, Thomas Keefe, Thomas, Terrence, Peter, Avan.
Avan O'Keefe, Western Australia 2011.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.109.19.210 (talk) 14:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved page to O'Keeffe Mrchris (talk) 19:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  O'Keeffe vs O'Keefe
Talk:Timeline of aviation before the 18th century

message: I have removed information from this article drawn from or sourced from the paper "The First Attempts of Flight, Automatic Machines, Submarines and Rocket Technology in Turkish History" by Arslan Terzioglu. This source is unreliable, as discussed on Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Rocket_Technology_in_Turkish_history. Dialectric (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Unreliable Source
Talk:He Hit Me (And It Felt Like a Kiss)

message: Isn't the correct title for this song "He Hit Me (And It Felt Like a Kiss)"? See, e.g., this picture of the 45 label: . The title is also given that way in the liner notes to The Phillies Album Collection. Szarka (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just moved it. lone_twin (talk) 10:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article/Song Title 

message: It's listed under both "In popular culture" and "Cover versions". I'd suggest keeping it in "Cover versions" only. Geoffhunt3 (talk) 22:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the Hole version mentioned twice?
Talk:Juan de Borgoña

message: there are differences in the two articles of Borgoña in english and spanish. spanish wiki says: he was born in 1468 or 1470. he died 1536. his birthcountry is either france or spain. they used the reference "The Grove Dictionary of Art, Macmillan Publishers Limited, 2000."
someone should compare the two books and articles. i put the link to the spanish wiki so yall can verify (im only translating and linking articles). if everything in spanish sounds correct, i can come back to translate that info here and vice versa (to expand both stubs). and spanish wiki has an external link that has more info to compare.
im sure spanish wiki is right on date of death (1536 not '34), cuz this article says he worked until 1536, but died in 1534. and if he was known by "Borgoña" or "Bourgogne", why would his son be "Burogunga"? and "joan" maybe should be "juan". it says he's junior, so he should have the same first and last name. i put the same contradictions between the two wikis in the discussion for the spanish article, so they can compare the two books too. Ivansevil 18:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictions from spanish wiki
Talk:Phlog

message: I think that the term needs to be disambiguated because most people i know  use phlog to refer to photo journals a-la-text-blog, thus PHlog.
Done. -Towel401 19:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

message: "The gopher protocol provides no way for the user to update the content using the protocol itself as with HTTP POST."
"Due to the limitations of the gopher protocol no commenting is possible unless one implements it using a separate Telnet[2], HTTP or Email-based interface."
The above statements that were in the article are incorrect, it is possible to send plain text information to a gopher server via the type 7 search query. It's how I do the gopher guestbook on my server: gopher://zcrayfish.dyndns.org/1/guestbook.mole
zcrayfish (talk) 06:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  no way for the user to update the content using the protocol itself?
Talk:HMS Cleopatra (F28)

message: Mates..
I am Fred Hurd.  I delivered Royal Mail to HMS Cleo in Sasebo Japan about March 1970 or so.  She was scheduled to put into port In Yokosuka Japan but was detoured into Sasebo.  I was in the US Navy stationed in Sasebo and I met the ship as she tied up in port and delivered the first mail she has recieved in about six weeks as she was underway on Anti Submarine patrol at that time.  I was saddened to hear she was sold for scrap but i guess that is the way with all ships in their time.  Good memories and she boasted a good crew as well.  They were surprised when I met the in port with mail as they didn't know their mail was being diverted to them.  Made alot of happy brit Sailors..  Good on all of them lads...Best to all
Fred Hurd
Reno, Nevada USA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.65.38.231 (talk) 23:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shipmates. I am the webmaster for HMS Cleopatra at www.hmscleopatra.co.uk This is a site for all ex serving members of C33 and F28. The information we have is what has been given by all members. If you have had relatives serving onboard at any time please contact us.
Trigger ex chef Cleo 79-81  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Killick78 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMS Cleopatra C33 F28
Talk:Hofgarten (Munich)

message: The White Rose memorial picture on the left obscures some of the text for me (looking with Safari and Firefox on a Mac). N p holmes (talk) 10:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made some changes now, which seem to remove the problem. N p holmes (talk) 09:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture problem

message: The aerial view doesn't show any "compromise" with the free landscape 19th-century style.--Wetman (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Compromise?
Talk:Adulthood (2008 film)

message: I came here to read about the film, and was shocked by how badly written this page is. I don't care enough to re-write it myself, but, in the hope that the author is reading, please try proofreading. "Jay makes Sam beg just like what Trife did". SERIOUSLY?! Did you learn about sentence structure at scchool?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.199.248 (talk) 19:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terribly written article

message: I think the plot synopsis reads like it was taken from promotional materials for the film.  As a result, it's not very helpful and raises several issues related to Wikipedia policy.  Can someone who has seen the film fix this, please?  199.8.45.37 (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When I came to the article, there were bizarrely two Plot sections, an I.M.D.B.-summary-type one and the badly written stuff indicated above. I haven't tried to make the section good (as it's too long since I saw the film and I don't know where else to research it), but I've at least combined the sections as best as was practical, and removed the outright spelling/punctuation/grammar errors from the second part. Salopian (talk) 15:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot synopsis
Talk:ABCD syndrome

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article is already under has our tag, I have now reassessed it to make sure if is in the right WikiProject. Upon reassessment of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Reassess article with class and importance factors
*Reassessed tags for correct placements
*added genetics task force
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Reassessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]
Talk:Benjamin syndrome

message: I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Mr. Travis Bohrer. (User: tbohrer74) at Waynesville High School.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hleasor (talk • contribs) 12:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page editing 

message: Hi! I think the section regarding Benjamin Syndrome needs to be updated to 'Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome'. I am new to editing on Wikipedia- so I'm not entirely sure if the source (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5973194/) is according to the policy. 
Thanks! Oluwa24 (talk) 00:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Benjamin Syndrome
Talk:Brunner syndrome

message: Please see WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS for how to organize and source medical articles.  This Dispatch is helpful in locating the correct kinds of sources (secondary reviews):  Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches.   This template filler is helpful in generating citations from a PubMed identified (PMID). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical guidelines 

message: By the way, since this page is part of an educational project, the talk page should be displaying the project tag at the top-- please add it.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational project

message: This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course.  As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article.  Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work.  If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further.  If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
* 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
* 1 - A few minutes of work needed
* 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
* 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
* 4 - More than an hour of work needed
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact of recent student edits