lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS Antietam (CG-54)

message: The Navy's report on the grounding has been obtained by Stars and Stripes via a FOIA request, https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/navy-probe-blames-captain-s-judgment-in-uss-antietam-grounding-1.480879 . The article needs to be updated accordingly. Safiel (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, . I've just updated the template to link to this discussion and moved it to a new section on the grounding. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 15:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:USS Vicksburg (CG-69)

message: USS VICKSBURG is no longer homeported in Mayport, Florida  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.0.45 (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS VICKSBURG 
Talk:USS Arkansas (CGN-41)

message: I served on The Ark for her last two years of service.  Never heard anyone call her 'Pigboat'.--I Use Dial 18:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pigboat? 

message: Early operations details seem great (I was there) but they miss a port call to Jamaica after our first refresher training and the collission on her first deployment. Anyone have dates and details about these?
173.10.214.171 (talk) 15:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Operations
Talk:USS Mississippi (CGN-40)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Those changes can't be referenced as it comes from my own personal and detailed journal that I kept during those activities.
The NAVSEA ref offered has weak descriptions.
I was receiving crew news updates, various other communications about surrounding events as well as watching with my own eyes.
Hostilities were waiting to commence once Mississippi got CVN-71 out past Yemen.
Couldn't risk that choke point and vulnerability should Yemen go bad.
The truth is that CGN-40 barely could keep up with that ship.
We struggled to follow that beast as it parted the Red Sea like Moses, more like plowed the sea out of its way- while launching aircraft.
The power and beauty of that carrier was jaw dropping.
Nitro was having boiler problems and limping south with a French Frigate escorting her.
Syria came through with approval for launches over its airspace,
so there was anxiousness among some to wrap-up escort and get up their to launch before any opportunity was lost to.
Once on point we launched, one flubbed. The wings failed to unfold and lock into position, so it spiraled around sickly and splashed into the deep.
I hope a diver doesn't stumble across that by accident.
More impressive were the Tomahawk missiles that came out of the sea near us.
I think they were launched from the nuclear subs USS Louisville and USS Normandy.
That's my referencing. A notebook here next to me full of details going on around that time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepsean666 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alteration of ships activity during GW1
Talk:USS England (DLG-22)

message: I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.
If you go to the U.S. Navy's website  and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.
In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".
The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.
I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)
I also would like to call your attention to the USS Norfolk (DL-1), the USS Mitscher (DL-2), the USS John S. McCain (DL-3), the USS Willis A. Lee (DL-4), and the USS Wilkinson (DL-5). If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?
-TCav 02:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see centralized discussion at Talk:USS Fox (CG-33). TomTheHand 15:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Text and references copied from USS England (DE-635) and USS England (DLG-22) to John C. England,  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:USS Gridley (DLG-21)

message: I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.
If you go to the U.S. Navy's website  and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.
In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".
The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.
I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)
I also would like to call your attention to the USS Norfolk (DL-1), the USS Mitscher (DL-2), the USS John S. McCain (DL-3), the USS Willis A. Lee (DL-4), and the USS Wilkinson (DL-5). If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?
-TCav 02:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see centralized discussion at Talk:USS Fox (CG-33). TomTheHand 15:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Invitation to Launching, July 31st, 1961 at Seattle, Wa Swinderyost (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Launching Ceremony Invitation
Talk:American Fur Company

message: What list would John Jacob Astor be the 4th "wealthiest American of all time?"  Can you site ANY sources?  It would add more authenticity to the article...  Or is this simply a matter of the author's opinion?  Stevenmitchell 04:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: John Jacob Astor

message: — Assignment last updated by Cahof (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Capstone-Fur Trade
Talk:USS Halsey (DLG-23)

message: I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.
If you go to the U.S. Navy's website  and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.
In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".
The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.
I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)
I also would like to call your attention to the USS Norfolk (DL-1), the USS Mitscher (DL-2), the USS John S. McCain (DL-3), the USS Willis A. Lee (DL-4), and the USS Wilkinson (DL-5). If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?
-TCav 01:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see centralized discussion at Talk:USS Fox (CG-33). TomTheHand 15:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frigates
Talk:USS Harry E. Yarnell

message: Changes were made to the CG-17 weapons and sensors. The changes are all linked and if you go through those links you will see that those systems are associated with the Leahy Class CG and the New Threat Upgrade. This should satisfy any dispute on sensor and weapons loadout.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.28.54 (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see centralized discussion at Talk:USS Fox (CG-33). TomTheHand 15:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:USS Reeves (DLG-24)

message: A number of images in this article's "Photo Galleries" section do not provide a source for where the images came from. They do say that the creator/author of the works are the US Navy, but it doesn't specify the exact publication from which the image was taken (e.g. a URL or a print media title or "own work"). As a result, I have tagged each of them for dated speedy deletion under WP:F4. Specifically, they are:
*:File:USS Reeves Underway Color (1).jpg
*:File:USS Reeves Underway Color (3).jpg
*:File:USS Reeves Underway Color (6).jpg
*:File:Reeves Mothballs (5).jpg
*:File:Reeves Mothballs (6).jpg
*:File:Reeves Mothballs (7).jpg
*:File:Reeves Mothballs (8).jpg
Respectfully, Mz7 (talk) 21:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They are all probably from navsource.org which got them from the old DoD server. Now they are probably all on loc.gov --Dual Freq (talk) 00:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, I'm not sure where the mothball ones came from. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Wow, thanks for providing source links so quickly! I've withdrawn the deletion requests and will forthwith begin the process of transferring to the Wikimedia Commons. All the best, Mz7 (talk) 04:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The first three files have been transferred to the Commons. The "mothballs" files appear to have questionable copyright status. I'll look into it. Mz7 (talk) 04:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images in gallery
Talk:USS Worden (CG-18)

message: I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.
If you go to the U.S. Navy's website  and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.
In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".
The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.
I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)
I also would like to call your attention to the USS Norfolk (DL-1), the USS Mitscher (DL-2), the USS John S. McCain (DL-3), the USS Willis A. Lee (DL-4), and the USS Wilkinson (DL-5). If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?
-TCav 01:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This Google search shows all pages at navy.mil where both "frigate" and "DL" appear.  It appears that when the DL designation was first used in 1951 it meant "destroyer leader", but DLs were reclassified "frigates" in 1955. TomTheHand 01:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The US Navy Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships repeatedly uses the word frigate in it's Worden IV article. I don't know if we need a centralized area for this discussion since this same item was posted on about a dozen talk pages. See also:Talk:USS Fox (CG-33) and others. --02:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll leave this comment at USS Fox and put links at all the other talk pages to point people there for centralized discussion. TomTheHand 15:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frigate?
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 65

message: If anyone has any ideas to improve this article or would like to add an image please do. Your help is greatly appreciated. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 21:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas

message: I'm curious as to where the concurrency with US 422 Business came from, as I cannot find any source indicating a concurrency between PA 65 and US 422 BUS. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking for a bright future for this article but i'll need your help TMF plus other editors from the Pittsburgh area (though you and me aren't from Pittsburgh). I need someone to rewrite the description in a formal way becuase i suck at writing anything. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 18:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 422 Business concurrency? 

message: I'm not from Pittsburgh, but i'll give a helping hand. -- PHI5000 14:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! we need more helpers though. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you're a vandal. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 20:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Helpers 

message: I failed this as a Good Article candidate because it lacks information about the early routings, and - more importantly - does not cite reliable sources. --NE2 16:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll renominate this article in a couple of days, but i need to make some minor changes. -- JohnnyAlbert10 Time to talk · My Help 16:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article
File talk:NKorea county map.png

message: Diacritics would be nice, “North Hwangae” should be “North Hwanghae”, “Cholwon” should be “Chŏrwŏn”, “Hoiryong” should be “Hoeryŏng”, “Saepyol” should probably be “Saebyŏl” – the dictionary doesn't indicate gemination, but I've seen it elsewhere.
Very impressive nevertheless. Thanks a lot for your amazing work. Wikipeditor 04:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling mistakes
Talk:Panzer Tactics DS

message: Could someone please create a page for this game? It comes out December 1st. 199.44.18.223 04:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: At some point, the image for the game's package should be replaced, as the current one depicts what I believe to be a pre-release design. At present, the image displays an ESRB rating of "Teen (T)", at odds with physical specimens of Panzer Tactics DS, which are marked "Everyone 10+ (E10+) Game Experience May Change During Online Play" ... oh, how I enjoy those tacked-on rating qualifiers.
D. Brodale (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Rating on Package
Talk:Halmahera

message: What is the etymology of these names and those of other islands?  This needs to be included.174.3.125.23 (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Vulcanite in the Halmahera ilands 84.150.80.157 (talk) 04:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dukonko
Talk:Robert Zieger

message: It's unclear, to me, why an encyclopedia article should contain information on what classes this individual is teaching this semester or year. Are these new classes that have never taught before, or never thought of before? Are these educational innovations? I thought professors were supposed to teach classes. Why is this something worth noting? (Or is this just advertising, to pack the professor's classes?) It would be different if the individual had won some honor for teaching, or for innovation in the classroom. Othewise, I think these should be removed (and I've removed them).
Additionally, the claims about the individual's teaching skills also are, I feel, inappropriate. Doesn't every professor demand their students come to class prepared? Doesn't every professor feel he or she offers a lot in class? Again, for many of the same reasons listed above, I would remove this section. However, if there is some way to provide support for these opinions about this individual, add them and leave the paragraph.
Don't get me wrong: Bob Zieger is a superb scholar, a great professor and terrific writer. It's just that these things aren't appropriate for an encyclopedia article. - Tim1965 15:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classes taught
Talk:Waigeo

message: This map shows Waisai in the wrong location, I believe. See Google Maps 97.113.143.16 (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map incorrect? 
Talk:Helen Jewett

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 02:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:USS Anthony (DD-515)

message: The "Anthony" in West German Navy (D170, Zerstoerer 1) become an other armament. Please note: not Armament:   5 × 5 in (127 mm)/38 guns, the Germany Navy has only 4 x 5 inch 127 mm guns!Please look here: http://www.heinzalbers.org/page-navy0029.htm
 --Heinz Albers (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bayerische Landesbank

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion and consistency. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 04:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: BayernLB →  – Real name of the bank, BayernLB is just the Acronym of it. See also for example Landesbank Baden-Württemberg. Thanks in advance. 2003:E7:EF0A:982:3085:EA6D:4F38:BDA2 (talk) 17:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Germany has been notified of this discussion.  — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 22:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 August 2021
Talk:USS Aulick (DD-569)

message: Ive read an article about the B-32 bomber and there was written that this ship rescued crewmen from B-32 which landed on the sea on the 28th August 1945. In this article is written that it was B-29 but I think it may be wrong. Could anybody verify that please. --Nadkachna (talk) 12:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The rescued
Talk:Deioces

message: Deioces (Old Iranian *Dahyu-ka) 727-675 B.C.[1]
^ R. Schmitt, DEIOCES in Encyclopedia Iranica [1]
The above is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medes
Gabrieli 13:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Section

message: The term “Aryan-Median” doesn’t work with this article as the name became widespread after the decline and fall of the empire (the Old Persian version that is), however to be clear, to make these claims permissible they must adhere to Wikipedia:Verifiability.Volkish Kurden (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume the editor did this without any intent but the fact is that there is no source or citation of said language thus isn’t reliable, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Volkish Kurden (talk) 05:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @HistoryofIran thank you for sorting that out! Volkish Kurden (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of source for recent edits
Talk:Wakefield, Michigan

message: Bosamar, please explain why you reverted my recent infobox edits back to its old form, which includes redirects, an outdated location map, format inconsistencies, and overloaded government information not seen in any other municipality article (information more suited for the body of the article and not the lead infobox).  Rather than revert necessary updates, you're welcome to make more constructive improvements instead of being a hometown defender of your own previous edits.  Also, a city hall image (or main street view) in the infobox is much more representative of the city that a visitor center statue.  I could be wrong; I've never been to Wakefield.  —Notorious4life (talk) 16:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good explanation for including the statue.  It looks like a very nice area, except it's 9 1/2 hour away for me, so I obviously have no understanding of local attractions and buildings.  I will simply reinsert the updated municipality image map (:File:Wakefield,_MI_location.png) and remove the redirect for ZIP Code, as well as using "official website" for the name of the URL since the spelled out link distorts the width of the infobox. —Notorious4life (talk) 01:08, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert explaination
Talk:USS Cassin Young

message: I don't think the statement is true, even though I read the same thing at the ship when I toured it last week.  The CY volunteers own web site shows that several other ships were hit after the CY, the last one being the LaGrange (APA-124), on August 13.  I haven't checked on all the ships on that list, but the LaGrange's WP page makes the claim that it was the last ship hit, and on August 13.  I was also looking at the WP page for Borie (DD-704), and it was hit on August 9, with substantial loss of lives.  At any rate, there seems to be ample evidence that the claim the the CY was the last ship is wrong.  Therefore I will delete the sentence making that claim. Busaccsb (talk) 20:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Last ship damaged by kamikazes?
Talk:Ryōgoku Kokugikan

message: The article was completely rewritten after a WikiProject Sumo cooperation. Feel free to add sources or complete categories (for example : "Other sports" could be enhanced and so could be "Other events"). Also, I leave the importance rating to more senior WikiProject members  OtharLuin (talk) 07:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: On the complete reorganization

message: Do we have a source for the 13,000 figure? This article gives a very precise 10,668 which is quite a bit less.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity