Talk:Sounder commuter rail

message: I hope that the Sounder logo is added into the Wikimedia Commons and is placed under the Sound Transit logo for proper identification. FOPFan300 22:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't the Sounder train have it's own logo?

message: I've added an external link that goes to Amtrak and Sound Transit's RailPlus program.  I'm a regular on the Pierce Transit operated ST Express (primarly the 592 and 594) routes as well as the Sounder.  I'm willing to contribute.
RaggieSoft 19:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RailPlus 

message: Since Wikipedia is not a How-to guide I'm removing the information about current schedule times. It's likely to date quickly, and we have a link to the current timetable. MKoltnow 00:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schedule times 

message: The recent edit to the article adds a lot of information, but it deletes a great deal as well. I would like things like the RailPlus reference to return. I also think we should try to avoid use of terms like "currently" and "is planning" since they date so quickly. The sentence describing the reason for the second train's being added "to help increase ridership" appears to be unsourced. Thanks for your contributions. Let's work as a team. MKoltnow 04:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big update 

message: I've removed this section - in addition to being... well, wacky, it didn't meet quality standards.
Just to clarify for the author - Renton won't allow at-grade rail through their city limits, and South Bellevue residents are extremely opposed to rail that often goes (literally) through their backyards. There are also a multitude of at-grade crossings that can't be separated, several of which are park access largely used by children: It would be horribly unsafe to add service on these rails. The rail through there is largely class 2 - all rail would have to be replaced, curves would have to be straightened (with earthwork and a new bridge south of downtown), signaling would have to be replaced, to run at anything approaching acceptable passenger speed. The line also doesn't serve downtown Bellevue or any of the major work centers - it's across 405 from the Bellevue urban core, doesn't hit Kirkland effectively, etc. The issues with this line go on - connections to existing transit hubs are virtually nonexistent, in several places it could never be double-tracked, etc, etc. There's no coherent proposal to use the line for transit because the moment you start looking at the logistics, acquiring new ROW becomes cheaper. Bensch 06:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastside Line Proposal section 

message: :Image:Sound Transit Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sound Transit Logo.gif

message: I added an infobox template to the top of the page. Information is taken from the article or referenced sources. I also looked at  other regional rail line articles to aid accuracy. I'm new at editing, so please let me know if there are things I need to watch out for! Joshuadkelley (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Transit infobox 

message: To quote my Facebook friend, Rob Ketcherside (author of Lost Seattle), "A Wikipedia oddity - this article makes no mention of early planning that led to Sounder, the date it was approved by vote of people or ST board, or the lengthy delays in starting service and the underlying causes." - Jmabel | Talk 18:19, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for expansion 

message: The overview states both Daily ridership = 18,314 and Weekly ridership = 18,314. This is obviously incorrect. I can't see how to edit this infobox. Linktex (talk) 18:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been fixed. I think the issue is with the infobox template itself, which I will investigate further. SounderBruce 19:16, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone fix the overview?