lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor

message: Some old talk not related to this article has been moved to Talk:Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor. I've put this comment above the "name" heading because it relates to some text from 2003. Graham87 14:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: There are ghits for both dates.  8/11 vs 11/8.  We had 11 August until this unsourced edit of 26 June 2008.  Britannica explicitly denies he was born on 8 November (1081), preferring 11 August (1086).  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  04:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Have reviewed and confirmed the 11 August 1086 date from a reputable source. Oatley2112 (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Born 8 November or 11 August?

message: The section Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor#Concordat of Worms contained an image (:File:The_death_of_the_Emperor_Henry_V.jpg) which does not seem to depict the death of Henry V, so I removed it. -- Crowsnest (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Henry V's death 

message: Hi! As most of you might have noticed, i am taking care of the translation as requested on top of the article. The content will, of course, replace some of the existing text. I am going to keep and intergrate as much as possible, though. Please let me know, if you have ideas. I thnk that the German language article is a bit too exhaustive at times. I suggest i translate it all and later we reduce it towards the essential info. All the best Wikirictor 17:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You are doing an amazing job. I am looking forward to reading the full article once you are done. Surtsicna (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: I removed the fifth generation from the ahnentafel because it is incomplete, excessive (it takes quite a lot of imagination to think of a reason to mention William IV of Aquitaine in this article) and uncertain. It is by no means clear that the father of Bertha of Milan was Otbert II. Similarly, it is not certain that Otto I of Savoy's mother was from Lenzbourg. This article is not the right place to delve into such matters anyway. Surtsicna (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahnentafel
Talk:Olaf Guthfrithson

message: Hi - While I'm happy to see the Irish rendering of this guy's name, I'm a little taken aback, because I've never seen it before, and in books I've seen he would be either Anlaf or Olaf Guthfrithson or Guthricsson.  Now of course there weren't any set spellings for any of these names, but it is possible we can have a set of alternatives, not too long, in the header somewhere so we can be sure what we're talking about and be able to relate this to stuff we might read off Wikipedia?  I know how touchy a subject this can be for people - am not bothered about which one is chosen for the article name, just want fellow readers not to be scratching their heads when they arrive.  This goes for this guy's relatives too.  Cheers. Stevebritgimp (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a discussion regarding this article's title at Talk:Olaf Guthfrithson. Ben MacDui 07:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Diet

message: Does Diet Coke "Aid in dieting"? Funny Americans! 
ummmmm how —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.56.156 (talk • contribs) 
:Diet Coke is low calorie, low carb, and sugar-free. I prefer water or tea for all those conditions, but some people like carbonated drinks. --Voidvector 17:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diet Coke 

message: I request a move to diet (disambugation). See the diet (nutrition) talk page for more information.
KVDP (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: This one gets a lot of bot-edits adding dodgy diet websites, probably ought to be semi'd. Herr Gruber (talk) 11:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam

message: I want to edit JahzarraJaniyah (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 02:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2023
Talk:Neverland

message: Was Barrie the first to use this name? And if so, does his estate have any claim on its use?
:Copyright never protects names, so him being "first to use" it wouldn't necessarily give them an exclusive claim on it.  Names can be protected as trademarks, but only if they're used consistently in the marketing of a product or service, and the play/book/movies have usually been marketed using "Peter Pan", not "Neverland".  I just did a quick check of the US Trademark database, and found several registrations by Disney (for "Return to Neverland") and by a few other parties registering that name for one product or another, but nothing that looked like the Barrie estate registering a claim to it.  So I doubt it, but only the courts could say for sure. (And of course this only refers to the U.S.) Tverbeek 04:32, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: here they are......
cheers - Purples 01:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some helpful tags for improving the article.... 

message: So, I saw in the article that "Other inhabitants of Neverland are suggested by Barrie, such as witches, although these are not elaborated on." Could someone tell me where these were suggested by Barrie? Also, a list or something like that would be fairly good as a source, since the statement is missing one.87.2.141.117 (talk) 01:40, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: At the time, the only meaning "redskin" had was an epithet for the peoples native to the Americas. Also their depiction in the play / description in the book was consistent with contemporary caricatures of Native Americans. Unless there's a reliable source that suggests some other meaning, the obvious one should be assumed. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other inhabitants 

message: The first sentence is missing the word "is.
No, it isn't.  The verb 'featured' is in the past tense, not the past participle.  The sentence would work with 'is' but its meaning would change.--Stelmaris (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Does Barrie state that his "Redskins" are from the US? If not, does it make sense to refer to them as Native Americans, even though that is the present-day term for the aboriginal peoples of what is now the US? — 84.13.131.180 (talk) 13:10, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: At the time, the only meaning "redskin" had was an epithet for the peoples native to the Americas. Also their depiction in the play / description in the book was consistent with contemporary caricatures of Native Americans. Unless there's a reliable source that suggests some other meaning, the obvious one should be assumed. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redskins/Native Americans 
Talk:The Wall

message: Why add the existence of this 2018 tribute album, as this is not the first (and probably not the last one either)? To name just a few: Out Of Phase made an electronic version of The Wall in 2000 and in 2009 Mojo magazine had The Wall Re-Built, spread over two issues. --Felix Atagong (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wall (Redux) 

message: The plot summary section of the article appears to combine elements from the movie that are not necessarily attributable to the album without a separate source to back it. For instance, the first sentence claims that Pink (the character) is imagining the audience from "In the Flesh?", but there is no reason to believe that it is not a real concert that Pink is performing at (in either the audio of the album or additional context added by the live concert performance). How can ambiguity in interpretation be succinctly added to this article?  Cleophelps64 (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Assumptions: Album vs. Movie
Talk:The Coasters

message: If the Coasters had a hit on "Love Potion No. 9" in 1971, The Clovers had it as a hit in 1959.  It could pass for a Coasters song (it's a Leiber-Stoller song, for one thing), but the Clovers also had lots of "story" songs, including "One Mint Julep".  "Love Potion No. 9" was the last Clovers hit.  Ortolan88 05:25 Jan 2, 2003 (UTC)
"Love Potion No. 9" was written for the Coasters. Leiber & Stoller gave it to the Clovers instead at the behest of their old friend, Clovers manager and United Artists label head Lou Krefetz.
Pstoller (talk) 02:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Coasters aren't a doo wop group.  They are a rhythm and blues quartet, like the Clovers and Drifters.  Doo wop doesn't encompass every singing group from the 50s, only some of them.  Can anyone defend this characterization?  Ortolan88 04:17, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Rhythym and Blues encompassed groups like The Five Keys, The Ink Spots, and The Ravens. R&B songs are slow, and don't have a bass lead-in (this was the thing that originally separated doo wop from R&B). Early doo wop was mostly slow, similar to R&B, and the up-tempo songs, like those done by The Coasters, didn't come around until the mid 1950s. Typically, then, the uptempo songs from this era are considered doo wop. JeremyMcCracken 16:24, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Doo Wop]]!([[Interrobang]])?

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations & References

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Coasters and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 19#Coasters until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Coasters" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1986 in music

message: I deleted the info regarding Peter Gabriel's wins at the MTV Music Awards. Gabriel won those 9 awards in 1987, not 1986. It was the Norwegian band a-ha that was the big winners in 1986, winning 8 awards. Mortyman (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Gabriel

message: Lets Go All The Way was huge, heard it in the dance clubs every single night in 86  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nustran (talk • contribs) 08:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sly Fox

message: While Jourgensen' autobio (and following accounts) mentions Twitch being released in July ’86, Apple Music/iTunes profile indicates a release date on March 12, ’86. Additionally, Billboard first mentions Twitch in its March 22, ’86 issue. Gleb95 (talk) 09:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: B.U.M.P. Gleb95 (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ministry (band)|Ministry's]] ''[[Twitch (Ministry album)|Twitch]]''
Talk:Iterative method

message: First, it ignores work by Gauss predecessors, including Newton. Second, it ignores the real world drivers (astronomy, business, and military issues) behind the effort to establish quicker tabulation methods.  --70.112.146.196 17:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I stumbled upon this article and was surprised Newton's method was not even mentioned indeed.  Isn't it a good simple example of iterative method?--Grondilu (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History section is too shallow

message: Standard division algorithms – restoring and non-restoring procedures - iterative produce one digit of the final quotient per iteration. 
The division methods are all based on the form X = b / A, where
•	X = Quotient
•	b =  Dividend
•	A = Divisor
Division methods are all based on a standard recurrence equation:
        Wk+1 =2Wk  - Aqk,              
where:
•	Wk  = the partial remainder of the division,
•	qk = the digit of the quotient  X  in k-th position, 
•	A = the divisor.
Both restoring and non-restoring divisions are based on the analysis of the sign of the partial remainder  Wk.   If  Wk  >= 0, then the divisor A  is subtracted from the partial remainder Wk , if  Wk  < 0  then the divisor A is added to the partial remainder  Wk .  Both methodes doesn’t  take into account the value of the partial remainder  Wk , only its sign.
Taking into account the value of the most significant digit of  the partial remainder  Wk ,  can accelerate the division process. If the most significant digit of  the Wk  is “1”, then we choose according to the sign of  Wk  -  addition or subtraction  the divisor A  to  the Wk  and write -1 or +1 to the correspondingly position of the quotient X  as in non-restoring division procedure. 
But if  the most significant digit of  the  Wk  is “0”, then we skip this iteration and write “0” to the correspondingly position of the quotient  X . So we get the quotient in the ternary system with the set of digits:  {+1, 0, -1},  which  is converted  then very easy into traditional binary system.  
Evidently this approach can be generalized to the vectors and matrices.  For example if   A -  m-th order matrix,  b – the right part of the linear system of equations,  
X – the vector of the unknowns, we have:
X = b A-1  ,
or:
AX - b = 0
For the k-th iteration:
AXk  - b = Wk,
where:    
     Wk   - value of residual vector for k-th iteration; 
       Xk   - value of result vector of unknowns on k-th iteration.
vladimir@baykov.de  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladimir Baykov (talk • contribs) 14:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iterative method for division algorithms and its generalization to the LSE solving 

message: As per numerical analysis, "iterative methods form successive approximations that converge to the exact solution". fgnievinski (talk) 02:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Methods of successive approximation]] into [[Iterative method]]
Talk:Ikhthus

message: The discussion of the Christian symbol Ikhthus should be separated from the discussion of the Zodiac sign Pisces. I cannot see any connection between the two, except that the acronym Ikhthus is, by chance, also a sensible Greek word. Mass. is the abbreviation of the word Massachusetts, but there is no special connection between the state Massachusetts and any church service denoted by the English word "mass". -- David, 2 Jan 2003.
Obvious duplication of subject matter with Ichthys. No opinion on which spelling to use for the final title. --Michael Snow 00:23, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Indirect self-reference

message: Cute. Indirect self-reference indirectly self-references itself. Should this be a real article? -- Wapcaplet
yes Vera Cruz
Perhaps some more clear explanations in regards to the "when quined" and "yields a false" examples are in order? Darquis 23:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I believe this text is incorrect:
:This example is similar to the Scheme expression "((lambda(x)(x x)) (lambda(x)(x x)))", which is expanded to itself by beta reduction, and so its evaluation loops indefinitely despite the lack of explicit looping constructs. (That behaviour derives from Scheme's eager evaluation rule. The equivalent expression in lambda calculus has no normal form, for the same reason, but is not otherwise as problematic as it is in Scheme.)
In particular, there is no difference between Scheme and lambda-calculus for the given example, so I'm going to remove the second part. In Scheme, and in most call-by-value functional languages (all that I know of), lambda-abstractions are considered values, and are thus not further reduced, even if the are arguments of an application.
If you disagree even after reading the explanation, please discuss it here before editing back in the text I removed.
--Blaisorblade (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect example 

message: I remember reading most of this in "Godel, Escher and Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid" by Douglas Hofstadter.  Should this reference be added? DrJamesEast (talk) 04:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Tatra 600

message: Tatra has nothing to do with Skoda except being both Czech.
in the picture below rigth,the chassi is from a volkswagen beetle,not of tatra  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.162.123.194 (talk) 15:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wrong - most of the Tatraplans were actually built by Skoda plant. The chassis on the photo, however, was from a VW Beetle, indeed. 217.118.93.92 (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slippery When Wet

message: "Hugh McDonald - rumoured to play all bass parts."
Is there any basis or research for this rumour?
--Thorns Among Our Leaves 23:11, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hugh McDonald? 

message: why was the original cover banned? not like u can see her titties or anything.24.144.137.244 14:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 17 years later and i'm asking the same thing.  seems par for the course for a cover of that period.  2601:19C:527E:56C0:AEEE:2139:8A30:1E4F (talk) 01:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wtf?

message: The section on the naming of the album contradicts the same section in the Bon Jovi article. Both require citation and references. Naysie 00:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictions

message: Could perhaps do with a link to the article about The Commodores' number one of the same name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.127.65 (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: I have proposed the creation of a WikiProject Bon Jovi here. If you would like to join or give input, please comment there. Thanks! Toa Nidhiki05 19:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Bon Jovi proposal 

message: Hard rock should be first.108.81.33.59 (talk) 06:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Please locate a published review which says that the album is more hard rock than metal. Wikipedia requires that the editors use verifiable facts, not facts that are personal opinions. Try looking for a book or magazine article about the album. Binksternet (talk) 05:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre change 
Talk:Idea

message: Sorry, it has been a few years since I have thought about the conventions of wikipedia article editing and talk pages, so this is likely not how I'm supposed to do it, but shouldn't this passage be given a qualifier, considering it is not fact, but rather the the definition of idealism as opposed to materialism?
"Ideas embody the prototypes of objects and concepts of reality, driving civilization and governing the institutions of social life support, culture, spirituality, ideas carry a semantic weight, thus filling and motivating the purpose of the personality's existence with a special meaning." Alex parsimoniae (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idealism vs materialism 

message: Ideas generate from a human body’s brain from what he receives inputs from his six senses.in all the senses images (sight sence) plays an important role in his ideas. Then the area he belongs,his life views, his thearies.. all becomes ideas.ideas are classified into two. 1) good ideas Ideas that are harmful to him /her and to the other living beings 2) bad ideas Ideas that are harmless to him/she and to other living beings Anooj v a (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea 

message: If I hear no objection, I'm slimming down the section on adventitious v. innate, adding it as a postscript to the Kant section (since "adventitious v. innate ideas" are a minor riff on Kant's "concept v. idea" that do not appear to be part of a major current and appear to derive from ephemeral secondary and tertiary sources as opposed to philosophical primary sources). Also I think we should ax the semantics section, and--even though he's not a major I don't personally mind--move Samuel Johnson up into the Philosophers section. Be back in a few days to see if there are any dissenters on this rearrangement.ThomasMikael (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should I ax the "adventitious v innate" and "semantics" after salvaging Sam Johnson by moving it into philosophy?
Talk:Moral panic

message: I think a "contemporary" or "ongoing historical" example of a moral panic would probably be the concern about pornography and the alleged effects it has. 2600:1700:8720:1050:B0AA:50FF:104F:FB7F (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porn? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dmaccartney (talk) 04:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Crime and Media

message: Whether or not they count, many people in the USA in the late 20th and early 21st century period were accused of displaying racist actions and committing sexual harassment. Is telling an ethnic joke in a standup comedy club a hate crime? or flirting with a coworker in the office get you placed in the sex offender registry? I agree the USA is hyped up over fears of communism (cold war era) and Islamism (post 9/11), and fears of pedophilia and queerphobia, like the awful tropes "male public school teachers recruit or groom young boys or girls" or "trans women and pre-op transgender Lesbians are purposely preying on other women violating their spaces" breed hatred and fears that constitute moral panics in MSM: instead of reporting serious issue and informing the public, they go on sensationalizing to cause moral panics that don't solve problems nor give out ideal solutions, they don't promote social justice, just make things worse. 2603:8001:2601:F351:E9C7:1862:8D49:AAC4 (talk) 23:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Add two more examples of moral panics: Racism and Sexual Crimes
Talk:Lower Austria

message: How much of the modern Czech republic (in km2 and mi2) was annexed to Lower Austria?  --JamesR1701E (talk) 13:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Protectorate of Bohemia/Moravia
Talk:Mitsubishi A6M Zero

message: The lead says "The A6M was usually referred to by its pilots as the Reisen..." but in the section entitled Name it says "In Japan, it was unofficially referred to as both Rei-sen and Zero-sen; Japanese pilots most commonly called it Zero-sen..." So which is it? Can we get a confirmation on one or the other name as the most commonly used and update the article so the two sentences reflect that?
Cadar (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal contradiction in article 

message: The article states that, at just under eleven thousand, the Zero was the most produced combat aircraft of the war. Under what criteria? I can think of at least a half dozen other types that were built in larger numbers than that without even looking it up. Mark Sublette Mark Sublette (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably meant in JAPAN, not the entire list of combatants.50.111.9.165 (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most produced combat aircraft?
Talk:List of Liberal Democratic parties

message: Twice I have added the Liberal Democratic Party (Turkey) and User:Autospark has twice reverted me; first without any explanation, later with this edit summary. Is this a joke? Because we both are saying the same thing, but you are linking to the article of the wrong Turkish party. Cannot you see that? --E4024 (talk) 14:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal Democratic Party - Turkey 