Talk:As-Sahab

message: Agree...just some idiot sitting in his basement waiting to rub his mothers feet.  Al-Sahab and Al-Qaeda are completely irrelevent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.198.133.72 (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: shouldn't the title be "Al-Sahab" as it is in Arabic?  Like "Al-Qaeda," and not "AQ-Qaeda" stan goldsmith 19:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No - this has to do with the rules of Arabic and which letters cause the L in Al- to be elided. S does this, Q does not. Occasionally we see, in English transliteration, Al- written with an L, as it appears written in Arabic text - but not as it is pronounced. This depends on the choice of who does the transliteration and is related to one's philosophy of transliteration. In general, I favour the "Al Sahab" way of doing it, but not for the reason you do - however since this page is already established, I'm fine with it. Although, I do think "Al Sahab" should redirect to this article. As for the other issue, that it should be writted "Sahaab," I think this can also be solved with redirection.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.92.63 (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration 

message: To most of the world, it's a media production team/company. To you and I, it's a videoblog. Yes, that's right. A guy with a computer. Show me otherwise!  82.71.48.158 20:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we do better? 

message: Someone added an entry with a reference to the Wired article. This is followed by a note about needing a more authenticative source. Considering that I am the person interviewed in the Wired article and who gave the presentation at Black Hat, perhaps I can provide a more authoritative source:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/papers/bh-usa-07-krawetz-wp.pdf
This paper describes the methods I used and provides examples.
However, considering that I am the source of this material, I do not believe that it is appropriate for me to edit this wikipedia entry. Doing so could be considered a bias. I will leave it up to others to determine what should be added and how.
Hackerfactor 03:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source and citation 

message: What option do I choose to upload the as-sahab picture if its never been copyrighted? im not going to get it copyrighted since its not mine and its never been copyrighted because al-qaida arent very lenient on copyrighting their work!
source: http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/LawPolitics/story?id=4889745&page=1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeroday (talk • contribs) 05:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright issues 

message: In the intelligence community it is know that As-Sahab videos are produced by the American company IntelCenter.  The CIA has contracted out creation of these propaganda movies to this company.  The company openly releases and sells these movies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IntelCenter  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.54.14 (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  IntelCenter no mention 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on As-Sahab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071025060608/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5g8-DEMtAE9q4i4ySQ0eV_qZefmRQ to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g8-DEMtAE9q4i4ySQ0eV_qZefmRQ
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified