lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Falooda

message: Is it really necessary to quote someone as describing Falooda as "The worst fucking thing"?
:I agree. It may be the worst f@cking thing in the world, but it's unnecessary to include this unreferenced quote. Applejuicefool 16:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I oppose the proposed merge because, while they have similar names and are historically related, they are not the same. Faloodeh, the Persian dessert, is not a drink, for a start. Munci (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an error in this article. Falooda is essentially not a drink in India or Pakistan either. There is a drink that incorporates falooda which seems to be called falooda also. I don't think it's available in North India or Pakistan. Seems to be an innovation from Bombay that's spread into some regions. However, there are other reasons to keep the articles distinct. As far as I know, the Falooda-qulfi combination, the usage of falooda in idiomatic language, etc are all specific to the subcontinent. It has a distinct history. Most Indians and Pakistanis have no idea that falooda is of Persian origin, anymore than the Irish think of the potato as a South American thing - it is considered totally native to the subcontinent. --Hunnjazal (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have arranged both articles so that no merger is needed. Xufanc (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, no merge. However I do think it is good to include the history and relationship between the two to show the difference. Jooojay (talk) 06:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Currently this article says the noodles can be made of wheat starch and it has a citation with a dead link for this information. I have never seen wheat-based noodles used since they have gluten and get soggy. Can someone find a more reliable citation for this? Or can we remove it, if not? I have looked and I am not finding it. Jooojay (talk) 06:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Noodles
Talk:Joseph Adams (mercenary)

message: This guy might be in charge of some of the staff involved in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress; certainly, some of the IPs were registered in his name. Johnleemk | Talk 11:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: The first paragraph seems a bit odd to me. His acting as a mercenary for the Contras was ok, but his having done so on behalf of a US agency (the CIA) caused him to be tried and found (slightly) guilty in a US court? I think further explanation is needed. Maproom (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanayion needed 

message: There is no credible evidence of this person's work as a mercenary.  The entire history is without any verifiable source. 23.84.234.97 (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No evidence
Talk:Hadrian à Saravia

message: This is clearly the same person as Adrian Saravia. 
Suggest we merge into the anglicized version of the name. 
I am happy to have a go at a merge if no-one objects.
footie 11:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As a result of merging the two articles on Adrian and Hadrian, there are some unresolved discrepancies in date of birth (carried over from discussion page of Adrian Saravia)
Do you have verification of year of birth? This seems to be one of the man differences between the two articles, one has 1531, the other 1532. --footie 15:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I keep forgetting to check Nicolson. It sounds like Oxford DNB might be our most authoritative current source, and I'd be happy to use their dates. I'd still like to know which original sources have been in play to keep these dancing around so much. (Great work with the merge, by the way) --Dystopos 17:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: As a result of merging the two articles on Adrian and Hadrian, there are some unresolved discrepancies in date of death. The 1911 Britannica has 1613, other sources have 1612. --footie 16:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: Does the spelling "Southhampton" have some special significance, or can it be changed to "Southampton"? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southampton
Talk:Burley football

message: Pumping Up Burley Footballs in the UK..
I have just bought a brand new Burley Size 3 for 11-13 yr olds and can't pump it up.
I live in the UK and the valve sizes of balls here ssem to be smaller. 
The inserts (screwed into the pump itself) fir the bladder valve tooe asily and when I pump the air just escapes back out again. I have tried putting vaseline in and around the valve to stop air escaping but to no gain. 
Can anyone throw some light on this? Are the bladder valves in AR footballs  different to other codes? Are there international standards. Or is there just a trickj to pumping up new balls for the first time?
George.
Where ever bicycle hand and foot pumps are sold, you should be able to obtain the little metal fitting for using the pump to blow up a footy. Works with basket balls and soccer balls and Rugby balls too. petedavo 04:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Valve
Talk:Round-robin scheduling

message: Someone needs to expand on this
- I completely agree with you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.119.247 (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: It was not immediately clear to me why round-robin scheduling would favor the biggest processes or data packet flows. I eventually figured out that this would only be true in the complete absence of quantum-slicing, or if the quanta were large relative to the size of the processes or data packets, or if the data packet size varied from one job to another. I made edits accordingly. However, it would be good if someone could confirm this, preferably with reference to a source. -AlanUS (talk) 15:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairness of round-robin scheduling 

message: The example provided in the section 'Process Scheduling' as an image is an excelent resource!    
However after following the process I found in 'Excute time = 475' a little mistake. P3 cannot be completed at execute time 475 because the quanta ends at 400. Then, by 475 P1 should have been completed and P4 should be in processing state. Jcammmmm (talk) 12:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a good idea to update the diagram 81.26.170.61 (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Process scheduling: error on the example
Talk:Restoration and Regeneration in Switzerland

message: Not sure about the move. I realize the English spelling is restoration, but this is the proper name of a period, using the French spelling. Much like the Restauration of the Bourbons, where we also use the French spelling. 130.60.142.65 12:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This is an English language encyclopedia, why would a French language word be correct for a description of a "restoration"? I can generally think of three important periods of "restoration" in the last 400 years of European history. The English Stuarts of the 1660's, The Burbon double restoration of the 1810's and the Swiss Restoration. In English, the word noun "restoration" is generally used to cover those periods of history. I never read the word "Restauration" used in an English language text. And I don't remember reading it in a 2003 NZZ article about the  "Act of Mediation" either. By the way, who is this "we" who uses the French spelling of "Restauration" in an English language context? TGC55 00:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Spelling? 

message: :Restauration (Switzerland) → Restoration (Switzerland) — As with the other editors on this page, I question how widely the French Restauration is used to refer to this period in the English-speaking world. A few google searches show that reputable websites like this one use the English "Restoration", while most websites using "Restauration", including this one, which got second-most hits after Wikipedia itself when I did my search, appear to be copycats of Wikipedia. YeshuaDavid • Talk • 15:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Page moved --Île_flottante~Floating island  Talk 16:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Switzerland in the Napoleonic era

message: The question is whether this page should be combined with the general page dealing with the country during Napoleon. I suggestion not. First, it may make difficult for someone to find Helvetic Republic if it is folded within a larger discussion. Second, anyone seeking that larger discussion can certainly go there.
Ralphadamfine 13:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: We should maybe split this in Helvetic Republic and Mediation; these periods are very brief, but they are usually treated separately, and this article is little more than a stub listing the two. dab (ᛏ) 12:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting

message: I removed the following sentence
After the Battle of Mainz in 1795 between the First French Republic and Habsburg Austria, at which Hessian (soldiers) participated under Colonel Johann KeglevichBiographisches lexikon des kaiserthums Oesterreich: Enthaltend die lebensskizzen der denkwürdigen personen, welche seit 1750 in den österreichischen kronländern geboren wurden oder darin gelebt und gewirkt haben, Band 11, Constant von Wurzbach, K. K. Hof- und staatsdruckerie, Wien 1864. the brother of Major General Stephen Bernhard Keglevich, who did not take part in this battle with his Serbian mercenaries, which had been near there, and which was funded by the British Empire through the sale of gemstones of Madame du Barry, the British rushed the Hessian mercenaries to Ireland in 1798, because the Helvetic Republic was founded, to assist in the suppression of rebellion inspired by the Society of United Irishmen, an organization that first worked for Parliamentary reform.
from the article.  It is unclear to me how any part of it is relevant to the Helvetic Republic. 99.14.217.240 (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content removal
Talk:Eggs and bacon (disambiguation)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. to Eggs and bacon (disambiguation). Redirected Eggs and bacon and Bacon and eggs to Full breakfast. If anyone (courtesy ping ) opposes the redirects, I would encourage going to RfD. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bacon and eggs →  – It would make more sense to move Bacon and eggs to Eggs and bacon as all entrees in the disambiguation page refer to themselves as Eggs and bacon instead of Bacon and eggs. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 20:10, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 November 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bacon and eggs (disambiguation) →  – The pages listed are “eggs and bacon” not “bacon and eggs”. And redirect Eggs and Bacon (disambiguation) to this article. Shwcz (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 December 2022
Talk:Economic and social development of the Communist states

message: Please explain objections in detail. Ultramarine 12:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The contents of this article belong in Criticisms of communism, which is where they were originally taken from. All discussion should go on that article's Talk page. Please do not move content until a NPOV consensus version has been agreed upon in the original article where the content is taken from. -- Nikodemos (f.k.a. Mihnea) 18:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, false. New information added, like the history section. Second, the title "Criticisms of communism" is inherently POV. Third, obviously an area like this deserves an article. Four, the content on the CoC article is very POV and inaccuarate, the referenced material here is correct. Ultramarine 18:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Don't have a cow

message: This page redirects to The Simpsons catch phrases following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Notation that this page no longer is purely a re-direct page.  While a short article, there is now a brief historical background on the phrase.  The Simpsons may have reintroduced the phrase into the American consciousness, but its time in the sone was half a century ago. -Kiwi 12:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since all. other usages are unsupported OR and unsourced for quite some time I'm going to be WP:BOLD and redirect to Bart Simpson which I believe has actually sourced references to the phrase. Nobody seemed interested in fixing this and to trim all the OR information would gut the article down to essentially the same references found in Bart Simpson Cat-five - talk 21:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected 

message: Am I right in thinking that this article is really a waste of space? Hardly encyclopedic  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.67.147 (talk) 19:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you're an SPA, you're in no position to make such a determination. As to the expression, I heard it decades before Bart said it. It was probably something Groening heard and/or said when he was likewise a kid. Researching it could be a problem, though. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubbish article? 

message: Before reverting this time please look at the edit history since the last attempt I made to redirect this article. Absolutely no progress has been made to turn this into a real article and it is 100% unsourced. The alternative to redirecting would be to enforce citation policies which would mean blanking the page, which would be even worse.  Cat-fivetc  ---- 01:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Again
Talk:IBM History Flow tool

message: I downloaded the software from the IBM site. However it doesn't have any instructions on how to use the tool. I couldn't find any way to point it at a wiki page. I want to use it to study contributions on our class wiki. 71.102.97.111.
:I'm also interested in some information. Conny 12:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How to implement

message: Build 187 was easy enough and after installing a secondary plugin, which was easy, I was viewing wiki articles.  
Wikipedia limits the history to 100 revisions. The history flow tool defaults to start at the begining.  Does anyone know a way to make it download the last 100 revisions?  
Tbmorgan74 16:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I seem to be able to get this to work - more or less. But I need to wait for a friend to write a script for that (I will publish it here when it's done). Special:Export needs to be used (or parsing database dump) to generate 1 separate file for every revision (and all metadata needs to be stripped); index file needs to be generated with 1 entry per line per each revision (details of index file are in tool's help). Shame the help file doesn't contain the code script for data collection itself, although the script should be relativly simple (for anybody who can actually write those things). PS. We already have a slightly modified Special:Export that can download past 100 revision (offset (revision) input field has been added), but we need to refine it a little bit (i.e automate - so the script does it all in one go).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  23:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there anything new about this tool? From the above discussion it appears almost unusable without major effort.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 21:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Implement

message: Is the tool still available? I couldn't find a download link. – Danmichaelo (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still available?
Template talk:Hidden begin

message: * mw:Manual:Collapsible elements
* mw:RL/DM#jQuery.makeCollapsible
* http://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Krinkle/CollapsingTestpageMw
Badon (talk) 23:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiding templates may be obsolete 

message: "Toggle" is a bit vague here, so please replace the second line
-->{{#ifeq:|left
with
-->{{#ifeq:|left
(...and, for consistency, the comment lines
   | | | 
replies: text: Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. —  (e • t • c) 23:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:   and hope you're feeling okay. Sardanaphalus (talk) 01:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

text: Already done Marked by requester. —cyberpower ChatOnline 18:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 13 June 2014 

message: If hidden begin contains sections how can these be kept out of the table of contents?  See Caucasian War.  Ideal would be one TOC inside and other TOC outside the hidden begin. Is there some kind of scope option that makes things like --notoc-- active only inside the hidden begin? Benjamin Trovato (talk) 01:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: that chunk of hidden text violates MOS:COLLAPSE.  if the purpose is to use it for future article development, it should be on the talk page, or commented out. Frietjes (talk) 01:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Benjamin Trovato (talk) 01:37, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  hiding sections from toc 

message: Please merge the sandbox to get rid of the deprecated NavFrame collapsing mechanism in favor of the core mw-collapsible. Tacsipacsi (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: looks good in the examples in the documentation, so done! Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 1 February 2018 

message: I found over 7,000 articles that include this template, even though it is not intended to be used in articles. Should it be replaced by another template (or removed) when it appears in these articles? Jarble (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This template is used in many articles 

message: Hi,
If this tempalte is used when the infobox (on the right) is in its way, the titlebar will be covered and the show/hide selection to be truncated and appear below. I have reduced the width of the titlebar to not be covered by the infobox, e.g. width=50%, the show/hide selection will still not appear on its titlebar but still get truncated below. The truncation can be duplicated on a computer, but I have not idea if it will happen on mobile devices.
Can any template editors help to resolve? The document page show that reducing the width prevents the truncation, but in real life it does not. Adding  before the template is not an option. Flipchip73 (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox will cause show/hide selection to be truncated 

message: As are  and . — Guarapiranga ☎ 00:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this talk page be merged with [[Template:hidden]]'s?
Template talk:Hidden end

message: * This protected page has been detected in :Category:Wikipedia formatting templates, but that category has been redirected to :Category:Wikipedia formatting and function templates. Please update the category link. --RussBot (talk) 13:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Harryboyles 17:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category link 

message: This template has two documentations, one of which is empty.--Unionhawk (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks. --Amalthea 19:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, I see I did it wrong. :) Amalthea 18:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Documentations 

message: Template:Hidden end has been listed at Templates for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:

to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually just going to be WP:BOLD here. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request to complete TfD nomination
Talk:Marthandam

message: I removed the external link because although it talked about the general area, there was nothing on it specifically about Marthandam. Roachmeister 13:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This entire section reads like a travel advertisement. I fail to see a relevant connection to Marthandam. Besides, it is highly over-emphasized, making up almost half the article. If no reasons for keeping this section are given, I will remove or shorten it in a few days. Huon 09:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Places nearby 

message: The second largest town in Kanyakumari District is not Marthandam. 
Marthandam is Second largest Commercial center on the basis of commercial income and population density . 
The largest town in Kanyakumari District is Nagercoil (Municipality) with a population 208,179
Second largest town is Kolachel (Municipality) with a population 23,787
Refer govt of India census website(http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Dist_File/datasheet-3330.pdf) . They mentions only first 3 laregst towns in each district. Martandam is not
even third.  So I am deleting this misleading information.
May be you can mention as Marthandam as second largest commercial center (though I am not sure)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonylejos (talk • contribs) 05:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Largest town in kanyakumari 

message: The people in Kanykumari District very well understand that Marthandam is the Second Largest Town in the District.   Every town/village/city in India are known according to their Postal Index Number Code. The PIN Code for Marthandam is 629165 which includes the adjacent Villages Nallur, Viricode and Nattalam (www.indiapost.gov.in/Pin/Pinsearch.aspx?Pin_On=629165). But for Administrative purpose its area was divided and added to Nattalam  &  Unnamalaikadai Town Panchayats and Kuzhithurai Municipality. Moreover out of the 21 wards in Kuzhithurai Municipality, 11 wards are from Marthandam (municipality.tn.gov.in/kuzhithurai/who_councilors.htm).  Therefore, Marthandam is the second largest town in Kanyakumari District.27.57.227.4 (talk) 07:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Largest town in Kanyakumari District  is not misleading 