lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frangela

message: I asked a question about the relationship between the two women in the comedy duo Frangela on the article talk page with the hope that someone who knew more about them could answer it for me because I have been unable to find the answer myself. Specifically, I asked if someone knew if they were lesbian lovers or not. User:Frazzle deleted my question. I asked why on this editor's talk page and they accused me of vandalism. I tried to explain and justify asking this question on Frazzle's talk page but they just replied with insults. I then asked for a third opinion on this dispute and User:Doc Tropics responded and said it was a legitimate question. Despite this, Frazzle has again deleted my question from the talk page. Because of this, I am requesting comments on this dispute from other editors. Please chime in with your opinion on this dispute. Thank you for your time.-Schnurrbart (talk) 02:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history of this page, someone already answered the question. I don't think anything is going to be achieved by carrying this on, apart from you and frazzle getting further annoyed. In other words drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. Quantpole (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Lots of layers to this one.  First, article talk pages are for improving articles so if your question looks like a fan question or doesn't seem to be related to article content, it may be removed.  However, asking a question is not "vandalism" by any stretch of the word.  Second, once the question was reasonably answered there was no reason to remove the material a second time; discussion of sexual identity or preference is not automatically a BLP violation.  If the question had been phrased in a negative or judgmental manner, perhaps the BLP removal would apply but that was not the case here. But finally since your question was already answered and article RfCs aren't really meant for user conduct, perhaps the best idea would have been to hash this out with Frazzle or just let it go. Shell   babelfish 22:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Frangela question
Talk:Ārohirohi

message: I have removed this as a reference:
*J. White, The Ancient History of the Maori. Volume II. Government Printer: Wellington, 1887, 136-137, 151-152.
There is nothing at those page ranges, nor at those page ranges in Vols 1, 3-6. Kahuroa (talk) 04:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect references
Talk:Aropaoanui River

message: The present article ends with
"In local myth, the area was named when the local tribe were roasting their captives on a fire after a victory in battle. The fatty pulp around the kidneys of their victims began to bubble, giving the impression that the victims were still alive, which terrified the tribespeople."
This doesn't sound credible. The cannibalism implied here, while not inconceivable, is rare among human societies. And if the people were indeed cannibals, then why would the sight of people being cooked terrify them? If this is true (or if it's a real legend), then it needs a really good source. 206.127.53.86 (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs attention, or at least a source
Talk:Clinton Clauson

message: That the author has vandalized on occasion does not, in and of itself, make this bio a candidate for speedy deletion.  Sources and notability assertions appear to be in order.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 06:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The suspicion can be removed by looking at the sources.  They appear to check out.  Also, I think being the subject of a Time Magazine article should remove most notability concerns..--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 07:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a possibility that there is some "joke" buried somewhere in this short article, but I have confidence that T. Anthony will remove it if before he is blocked.  On quick inspection, all the referenced sentences seem to be good.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 07:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete contested
Talk:Athletic Park, Wellington

message: The last 2 paragraphs of the opening section talk about the new, and more importantly; different stadium. When reading, their is a clear tone against the fact that a new, different style stadium was build. This section should, and will soon, be removed unless a legitimate reason to keep the article as is can be presented.  PeaceKeeper1234 00:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Auckland Town Hall

message: I have a video record of the recent Mike Mizrahi light show at the hall.
Therefore propose addition of an external link, thus:
*Auckland Town Hall - A short Faber Optimé YouTube video showing the Town Hall in different light.  —Preceding undated comment added 08:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. As has been explained to you by several people at User talk:Faber Optimé, you should not be linking to your own work, and all those who have reviewed your videos to date appear to have agreed that they are not suitable as links.-gadfium 20:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External link
Talk:Prime number/Archive 2

message: Here are the explicit formula for prime numbers, twinprimes, number of primes, number of twinprimes. It was published in the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences and reviewed by other mathematical journals. The formula was examined as correct by world renowned mathematicians such as Dr.Paul Erdos, Dr.Halberstien and Dr. K.Ramachandra of TIFR. The four formulae were discovered by Venu Atiyolil in the year 1983 and are presented below in the pdf format. The proof may be difficult to follow to some mathematics students as the method of writing was from a world class School of Mathematics where the author was a research member.
 
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/mathsci/92/00000050.pdf
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/mathsci/92/00000051.pdf
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/mathsci/92/00000052.pdf
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/mathsci/92/00000053.pdf
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/mathsci/93/00000068.pdf
<End of article> ____________________________________________________________________
I was going to change the formulas to TeX, but some of them don't seem to make sense.
Under "Formulas generating prime numbers", the first "alternately" definition given subtracts (j-1)! from itself. Thus the summation function is just 1/j.
The second "alternately" divides j by itself. This also effectively means (j-2)! is subtracted from itself, so the summation function is 0.
These are obviously incorrect. What exactly is to be done about these? Eric119 06:30 Feb 17, 2003 (UTC)
:Um, never mind this. Silly me, I didn't catach on that [x] was given as the floor function. I thought it was just normal bracketing. Okay there are no problems with the formulas now (except I still need to convert to TeX...). Eric119 06:41 Feb 17, 2003 (UTC)
-----
*why does composite link to Prime? --PY
----
An anon user added some bogus about prime number formulae. Please do note that the number of computations in these formulae is at least as big as the number of computations involved in optimised versions of Erastothenes' sieve for a number of comparible size. Can someone make it NPOV? Gebruiker:Dedalus 12:24, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the page, and I'm moving the information about Venu Atiyolil's contributions to formula for primes, where I will rewrite it NPOV. -- Dominus 14:47, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: I replaced the link to the author's GeoCities site (which was unreliable, since the paper in question was only downloadable at bitmap images that soon exhausted his bandwidth quota) with links to the PDF archive version of the pages on the official web site of the Indian Academy of Sciences.  -- Dominus 15:09, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Formulae for primes
Talk:Shovavim

message: I noticed this article is written in English but uses a lot of Hebrew words.  Might it be beneficial to use english words or include them in parentheses?  67.82.36.191 (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added "(charity)" in one place, but I'd encourage you to make use of a decades-old feature: hyperlinks. You should be able to RIGHT-click on your browser, open the wiki-link to another windows, read, then close the explanatory window. Pi314m (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: There is a Shovevim article which is the same as this one. They should be merged  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegarad (talk • contribs) 19:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  As of this reading, it's already been merged/redirected/etc.  Pi314m (talk) 21:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same article 
Talk:Allan Zullo

message: I am practicing how to evaluate and edit articles for a course, and I am providing the following suggestions as part of an assignment. The lead provides some information that is not present in the article, as well as statements that are not cited (i.e., education, desk calendars, and comic strip.) Sections could be created for early life or education as well as kinds of creative works: children's series, books, comics, desk calendars, etc. With everything in one long bulleted list in the bibliography section, it is rather difficult to read. It would be easier to read if broken down into smaller sections where it could be expanded upon in paragraph form. DanaGhouse (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Feedback
Talk:Bayswater, New Zealand

message: The Bayswater article could be expanded with a section on Bayswater Marina 2404:4408:67B7:E800:8D95:4283:CD4C:684F (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bayswater Marina 

message: The cemetery has notable historic significance so probably should have section in the article.
*  O'Neill's Point Cemetery
* Gone and ForgottenDuncnbiscuit (talk) 09:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  O'Neill's Cemetery section 

message: A wildlife section mentioning the mangrove and rare wading birds found in Shoal Bay could improve the article
* CONSTRUCTION SITE DOTTERELS
* Marina's climate-change response threatens Shoal Bay birds, say conservationists
*  North Shore- Protecting Our Environment Duncnbiscuit (talk) 10:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoal Bay SSWI
Category talk:Japanese painters

message: I'll try and get around to fixing this mess.  If anyone is interested in helping, I'll be happy to have your assistance.  You may have already noticed that there is no uniformity in name citations. I suggest we order (as I've seen in other articles on Japan) family name first, and given name last.  It may also be apropriate to state that in the heading.  How do you feel about putting Japanese names in parentheses after the more well known assumed name? For example:   Foujita, Leonard (Fujita Tsuguharu)  My reason for adopting this method is taken from similar examples ie: El Greco (Domenicos Theotokopoulos) etc. Rawkcuf 16:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Benmore Dam

message: The reservoir volume figure looks wrong.
Pickrill and Irwin (1986) quote the following:
* area = 94 km2
* mean bulk residency time = 67 days
* mean annual inflow = 323 m3/s
which implies:
* lake volume = 1869e6 m3
* average depth = 19.9 m
Pickrill, RA and J Irwin.  1986.  Circulation and sedimentation in
Lake Benmore, New Zealand.  New Zealand Journal of Geology and
Geophysics.  v29 p83-87.
New Zealand Electricity Authority.  2010.
GeneratingStationListNov2010.xls - spreadsheet file.
* download  : http://www.ea.govt.nz/document/11750/download
* retrieved : 28-Jan-2011
quote the following:
* Hydro_Max_m3_Storage = 74 (the 10^6 is part missing on their figure, gosh!)
* Typical_Annual_GWh = 2500
The 74e6 m3 figure is almost certainly correct.  The current 12.5e6 m3, also on Meridian publicity, is almost certainly wrong.  The NZEA figure gives 61 days and 0.80m of top layer "storage" whereas the Meridian figure gives 10 days and 0.17m.
I haven't time to make the changes and check the english .. sorry -- Robbiemorrison (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This problem is compounded by the fact that the text refers to 12.5 x 106cu.m., whereas the infobox says 1.25 cu.km - which is 12.5 x 108 cu.m. One or the other is out by a couple of powers of 10. Grutness...wha? 13:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect reservoir volume 

message: The dam is currently in the Canterbury Region, according to the boundary shapefile from Statistics New Zealand (which LINZ refers to). The boundary follows the Waitaki for about 20 km inland from the sea to Goulding Rd, afterwards ridgelines of mountain ranges (including Hawkdun) on the southwest side of the river. Benmore is about 23 km from Otago, at the closest point. XLerate (talk) 06:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Region 
Talk:Book of Zhou

message: Volume 13 in biographies section does not have a link under translation section of wiki pages for: Princes of Wen; Princes of Xiaomin; Princes of Ming; Princes of Wu; Princes of Xuan.
–––02:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographies
Talk:Old History of the Five Dynasties

message: *
Great Russell Street
Jan Jakob Maria de Groot
Berthold Laufer
Field Museum of Natural History
http://books.google.com/books?id=eNXGT2ag-6EC&pg=PA360&dq=wu+tai+shi+five+dynasties&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fhioUMCyGa-n0AGR84GYDQ&ved=0CEMQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=wu%20tai%20shi%20five%20dynasties&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=qn_WAAAAMAAJ&q=kiu+wu+tai+shi&dq=kiu+wu+tai+shi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4haoUJeJNYfp0gGf2YDwDQ&ved=0CE8Q6AEwBg
https://books.google.com/books?id=R0QpslzUi50C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Jerezembel (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wu dai shi five dynasties history
Talk:History of Ming

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=P78qAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Title	明史紀事本末: 80卷, Volumes 304-312
明史紀事本末: 80卷, 明史紀事本末: 80卷
Author	谷應泰
Original from	Harvard University
Digitized	Aug 5, 2008
Rajmaan (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  明史紀事本末: 80卷, Volumes 304-312  By 谷應泰
Talk:Tornado myths/Archive 1

message: The "myth" about right turning tornadoes was removed. Often (but not always) a good sign on  radar of when a tornado is on the ground  is when the supercell turns right of the main flow of the system. The article had stated that tornadoes move in the direction of the system that formed them. That is not always true, the circulation can some times cause the cell the move in a slightly different direction, a turn to the right. The rest of the storms can be moving North East while the tornadic storm  begins moving due East. 
More over, the "myth" was not debunked with any factual statements or sources.
-
Hokay, I made a bunch of changes. 
*For one, I removed tornado plasma--if it's not debunked, it's not a myth, and doesn't fit on this page.
*I reordered the myths in what I considered to be descending importance.
*I wouldn't have added the "false" bit after the myths--I think that's implied by the topic of the article--but given the big bold Safety Alert I saw on the Andover%2C_Kansas_Tornado page, figured I'd leave it.
*For the trailer park section, I really wanted to put "this is nearly more an ironic statement than an actual myth, as no one with a brain really thinks tornadoes go looking for mobile homes" but I couldn't work out how to do that NPOV.
*I wanted to hit that intro sentence too but I couldn't work it out.
--Spinn 19:55, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
:I hit that intro. :) There's still a lot of room for improvement, though.
:I think the trailer park section could stay listed as a myth. Not everyone has a brain. And certainly not everyone who lives in a trailer park.... TheMadBaron 10:27, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It might give your cat half a chance to escape the lava.... TheMadBaron 16:09, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard Raspy Sci 23:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

text: A myth can still be true... --Kotjze 20:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've suggested a rename for this article. The title as it stands, "Tornado myths", is redundant and erroneous, and is in conflict with Wikipedia's article on Mythology(this having nothing to do myths in their right definition, but is more about misconceptions, erroneous beliefs and urban legends) and as such directly makes Wikipedia contradict itself, which is unwanted. I don't think this is too problematic a scenario, but I would like to hear some of your thoughts on the matter before going through with the namechange. Lemegeton 11:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the Britannica is attempting to reform usage; and its staff may be entitled to do so; we aren't. Septentrionalis 23:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: No consensus among the two editors. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 21:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result: no move
Talk:Rosengarten group

message: Google search results in:
* Rosengarten massif 611 - Catinaccio massif 109
* Rosengarten group 490 - Catinaccio group 401
* Rosengarten mountain 287 - Catinaccio mountain 218
* Rosengarten mountains 184 - Catinaccio mountains 268
:: Total: Rosengarten: 1572 vs Catinaccio 996 - most commomly used: Rosengarten Massif and Rosengarten Group
a google book search results in:
* Rosengarten massif 1 - Catinaccio massif 4
* Rosengarten group 77 - Catinaccio group 20
* Rosengarten mountain 2 - Catinaccio mountain 1
* Rosengarten mountains 7 - Catinaccio mountains 8
:: Total: Rosengarten: 87 vs Catinaccio 33 - most commomly used: Rosengarten Group
an to be really sure:
* Rosengarten "South Tyrol" -Catinaccio 3110 - Catinaccio "South Tyrol" -Rosengarten 321
* Rosengarten Südtirol -Catinaccio 667 - Catinaccio "Alto Adige" -Rosengarten 787
: --noclador (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  to be 100% sure
Talk:Sequoia High School (Redwood City, California)

message: For the archived deletion debate for this article see Talk:Sequoia High School/delete. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 20:21, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Update that link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequoia High School, December 2004, outcome was Keep.--Milowent • hasspoken 19:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bill Busbridge

message: The claim that he won Champion Of The Colony award is disputed as there is no evidence that such an award was ever given to Victorian footballers.
RossRSmith (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football 
Talk:Charles Loewen

message: Infelicitous:    "moved with his wife to be" ...
J. McKay 74.56.92.24 (talk) 13:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Nationalmuseum

message: Where exactly does the name "National Museum of Fine Arts" come from? The English version of the museum website refers to itself as "Nationalmuseum". Is this a title made up by a Wikipedian or merely an older name of the museum?
Peter Isotalo 08:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that the name "National Museum of Fine Arts" is used on the museum's WebArt search engine, while the name Nationalmuseum is used on the rest of the English version of the website. The article should probobly be moved to Nationalmuseum since that seems to be the official English translation of the museum. /Slarre 15:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The reasoning makes sense, but isn't the name somewhat close to "Nationalmuseet" which is the similar institution in Copenhagen? Valentinian T / C 09:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Premier League Asia Trophy

message: As far as I am aware, this competition is only called Barclays Asia Trophy in 2007, when it was hosted in Hong Kong. Barclays did not sponsor the 2003 and 2005 editions and it was known as the FA Premier League Asia Trophy. Ngchikit 08:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, you are right. Barclays is just a sponsor name. KyleRGiggs 19:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, by the way, the name of 2003 edition is called FA Premier League Asia Cup. KyleRGiggs 03:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sponsor Name

message: How are teams selected for this cup?
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selection? 

message: It doesn't seem to have happened yet, but would a team still be able to compete if they were relegated or would they be replaced?Villafancd (talk) 22:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't really an importnat tournament, relegation shouldn't matter, but i guess clubs are choosen/invited from the current 20 croip, so even if someone was relegated, then it wouldn't realyl take effect until the year after, the club in question would still kind of have Premier Status as they would only just have been relegated, so if anything they would be in the memory even more. Druryfire (talk) 10:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relegation 

message: There is mention in this article of the Premier League's preference for this tournament to be a worldwide pre-season event, rather than just in Asia. We have recently had announcement of the Premier League Summer Series in the United States - which appears to be the spiritual successor to the Asia Trophy. 
Should a separate article be created for the Summer Series, or should this article be updated with the new tournament/name?  Bored0stiff (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premier League Summer Series
Talk:Medical education in the Philippines

message: Was she a doctor? There is no mention in the bio-article.I want to categorize here under Filipino doctors.--Jondel 08:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eva Macapagal

message: if you didn't hear about it yet, desperate housewives dissed doctors from the phillipines
by having the character of teri hatcher say the line to the effect of 'I hope you didnt
graduate from med school in the Philippines'.  This was just said in tonight's (9/30/07)
show.
I am outraged by this, Filipino doctors are not to be portrayed as such at all.  You
should do something about it!  I'm not watching that show ever again.  I seldom do anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.98.81 (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  desperate housewives dissing philippine doctors 

message: It seems to me premature to condemn Desperate Housewives for a comment that has not yet been refuted.  The character Susan Mayer was merely repeating a stereotype, which can be condemned if it has no basis in fact.  It may be that the stated qualifications for doctors from the Philipines is similar to those of the United States, but that doesn't mean the actual doctors end up as good.  Different schools obviously differ in their levels of academic rigor.
Are there any unbiased sources of statistics on this?  Malpractice rates would be a good start.
In any event, a Controversy section should be added to this page to address this issue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Axel wheeler (talk • contribs) 16:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there data on the quality of doctors from the Philipines vs US and other places? 