lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:High Society (magazine)

message: My edit is clearly not vandalism, you shouldn't label it as such. I have explained in my edit summary why the moresources template shouldn't, I've always been taking care here to have useful edit summaries. Use them. Also I've replied to you on my talk page as well, just to make sure you have as many opportunities for dialogue as possible. Cheers. Mathmo Talk 04:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Valrith|Valrith's]] reverting

message: Given that Gloria Leonard is dead, I'm thinking she's no longer the editor, but I have been unable to find a source for who is.  Also, it appears that the magazine may have been sold to Swank (they seem to manage the website, and this page indicates that both are owned or administered by Magna Publishing Group), but I can't tell when that happened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.149.58.169 (talk) 01:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this have more current information? 
Talk:Prophet River, British Columbia

message: Just want to put in which indigenous people the reserve "belongs" to; I'll try to find out via inac.gc.ca but if anyone knows please provide it; Dunne-Za I think but I don't know the ethnocartography in this part of BC well....Skookum1 (talk) 04:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunne-Za or Slavey?
Talk:3 Maccabees

message: Removed POV passage reproduced below. Cited no sources, very "angry" interpretation of the history, and used many antiquated POV terms:
'However in 787 the 7th Oecumenical Synod re-affirmed the 6 previous Oecumenical Synods and the holy, including local Synods in between, including the Council in Trullo, with the active support and consent of the Patriarchate of the West, led by the Bishops and Popes of Rome. It was only after the Great Schism of 1054 that,as part of their doctrinal innovations (such as abolition of the married priesthood, the filioque clause, purgatory, and having one supreme bishop, the "Pope of Rome", who can dictate to all and who is supreme over all others,that the "Roman Catholic Church") removed 3 Maccabees, with its definitions of true and false authorities, and description of the full repentance of a hostile authority and punishment of those people of God, Old Testament Jews, who had sided with that same civil authority before it repented. Something the Romanist attempts at Pontifical dictatorship found very challenging, because it provides a precedent for the punishment and potential execution of overthrown "Popes of Rome" and their supporters.' Amtfisher (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed POV section of first paragraph
Talk:Henry Booth

message: I am minded while I think I have improved the article it is currently inconsistently unbalanced with flaws.  I am now unclear whether I will successfully exit under construction and others may need to clean up after my mess.  I may attempt to get this clean in the next 24 hours or so but I am aware I may fail and others may need to clean up.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 01:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing under construction
Talk:Dominion (Stargate SG-1)

message: From the notes section (removed):
It's unclear why the ancients didn't act against Adria when she ascended, as the reason given for them not acting against the Ori was that the Ori stay in their galaxy.
I removed this because we technically don't know that they haven't taken some form of action. Opinions? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattbuck (talk • contribs) 19:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pure speculation (that they didn't act, and that Adria stayed in that galaxy after she acended), and should stay gone. --Maelwys 20:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient action 
Talk:Lon Stiner

message: The Pyramid Play was first unsuccessfully performed against Washington State in 1933.  It was later successfully performed against both Oregon and Fordham.  The use of the play in the Oregon game is the most publicized, because it was in the Civil War, was photographed, and was later used as Nazi propoganda, highlighting the "brutality of American sports."  I believe that we should fix the article to reflect the error.
Additionally, while Oregon State indicates that the play was made illegal within a year, newspaper articles tend to indicate that the play was not made illegal at least until the late 30s.  To my knowledge, no one performed it other than the 1933 Ironmen, though.  Wilkyisdashiznit (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyramid Play
Talk:List of school districts in New Mexico

message: I found this NM school district map in 1999 though I don't know if consolidations happened since then https://web.archive.org/web/19990203143357/http://sde.state.nm.us/districts/index.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map in 1999
Talk:Lendians

message: I have reedited the article and included some information form the Polish Wikipedia. Yeti 20:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2007 

message: Piotrus, please stop it. There is no need to improve my grammar. There is no need for two identical passages following each other. There is no proof that the land of the Lendians was ever controlled by Poland before 1018, although some Polish historians make much out of the Primary Chronicle's statement that Vladimir conquered the territory from the "Lachs" (in fact, the term may be interpreted to refer to the Lendians rather than the Poles of Mieszko). I assure you that Great Poland will not collapse because of my edits. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:OWN. Article after your edits is not perfect, and other users have the right to improve it further.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  14:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You failed to respond to my objections in any meaningful way and proceeded right to revert-warring. I'm not impressed, to say the least. --Ghirla-трёп- 15:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not impressed by your reverting of my style and clarification edits. Lead expansion is recommended by WP:LEAD, style changes by WP:NPOV, your own version states that "At one point in the 970s, the region seems to have been overrun by Mieszko I of Poland" so you are contradicting yourself above when you are saying that's inaccurate, and clarification of what happened in 1340 is again a positive contribution (I do agree with your removal of later history, it's not related). Therefore your reverts are not helpful, and your confusing arguments here are not helping.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  03:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is your favourite explanation for explanation's sake, without any substance to buttress your opinion (if there is any). I still see no point in your edits. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I edit anything without Piotr's surveillance? 

message: What is this? Is the author trying to suggest that Piech used to be "Pietrch", Stach -- "Stańsch" etc.? Nothing points to this; quite the opposite, all diminutives/augmentatives with "ch" instead of the last tematic consonant appear in very old texts without such fanciful "older" variants. Also, form "Lęsiech" should probably be "Lęszech" and Latinate "Lechia/Lęchia" attributed to the proto-language is plainly wrong. 89.231.112.123 (talk) 15:53, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lędchy?!?

message: Silar, please stop adding ridiculous theories from medieval chronicles to the article . Find a secondary source which supports this claims. Otherwise, keep it out.VolunteerMarek 17:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silar 

message: Who is the author of fiction is: "...East Lesser Poland and Cherven Towns between the 7th and 11th centuries."?--109.110.74.103 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Lesser Poland in the 7th and 11th centuries?
Talk:Desert Saints

message: Oppose, I think it's fine as it is. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 21:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Arthur Banks With Desert Saints
Talk:Generalized Verma module

message: Thanks for an interesting article! What are the restrictions on the Lie algebra g? Is it acceptable
that g is a real Lie algebra? Ulner 21:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry for not answering sooner. In the definition, there is no problem when g is a real Lie algebra. Further, all the properties of GVM homomorphisms are true for komplex representations of real Lie algebras, because the GVM associated to a komplex rep. of a real Lie algebra are naturally isomorphic to GVM's associated to the complexification of the original Lie algebra (the representation remaining the same). If you have real representation of real Lie algebra, then I'm not sure if the description of GVM homomorphisms is so easy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franp9am (talk • contribs) 21:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Shamoun Hanna Haydo

message: NO source tells us anything about Shamoun being an Assyrian. We got 1 source telling us he was aramean.Dejwono (talk) 20:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: @Rosadbehaydo I changed it back to Aramean i hope they don't change it to A
assyrian Kristian Lahdo (talk) 23:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aramean or Assyrian 

message: The hero SH Haydo was Syriac-Aramean and an Assyrianist as claimed by the ideologues. Assyrianism and the so-called Assyrian identity is a modern invention that date to around 1870. We hail from Tur Abdidine and throughout history, we were known as Syrians, old Syrians or Syriacs. Tur Abbdine was an old Aramean kingdom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.227.132.60 (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: They were known as „Syrian“ as you say, which comes from the word of „Assyrian“ so it’s the same thing, a big part of the people from Tur Abdin identify as Assyrian and have always been called „suroye“ like the eastern Syriac speakers calling themselves „suraye“ these words simply means „Syrian“, and Syrian comes from the term Assyrian. Tur Abdin was an old Aramean kingdom and also a part of the Assyrian empire, arameans and Assyrians are synonyms today, even back than aramean tribes and Assyrian tribes intermingled with eachother and that’s why the Syriac-Aramaic languge contains so much Akkadian words. Best for the article to add both names, to avoid confusion since this people have many names to identify with. 2003:E1:8709:D600:3822:1550:C9C7:D4E6 (talk) 10:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syriac-Aramean
Talk:1982 Monaco Grand Prix

message: The race summary needs cleanup. IMO, it doesn't sound encyclopedic.
Carn29 21:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: The race is often presented to fans comedically due to how it ended, but it should be stated that victory for Pironi who failed very near the end of it whilst leading (all other things being equal) ultimately would have delivered the World Title to him (champion Rosberg 44 and Pironi 39 with 9 points for a win). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr gobrien (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Poignancy for Pironi
Template talk:Cinema of the United Kingdom

message: Black Hangar Studios (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2014

message: Please include Black Hangar Studios to this listing. Many thanks. http://www.blackhangarstudios.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Black Hangar Studios (talk • contribs) 11:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless an unbiased editor writes an article about it which shows it to be notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Hangar Studios

message: Can someone please add ITC Entertainment to the defunct section?  Thanks  78.32.143.113 (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected edit request

message: Add 2021 to the table showing films of Britain by year.
Also, instead of Culture of United Kingdom, write Cinema of United Kingdom. 122.181.87.20 (talk) 15:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A link to the article about the Cinema of the United Kingdom already exists and I see no reason to remove or replace the other link below. Shellwood (talk) 15:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2021 (2)
Talk:Dollarton, North Vancouver

message: AfDs for this article:
: – (View AfDView log Stats)
:()
Page has lost its meaning. One user confused as to either it being a page about an author or a road. Page should be made for author if there isn't one. Also there is no such thing as the dollarton area. The Dollarton Hwy is what this article is talking about.  50.68.186.108 (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Dollarton, North Vancouver]]
Talk:TV3 (Medford, Massachusetts)

message: This page is currently undergoing revisions of its citation in an appropriate format to help eliminate orphaned links.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasonras (talk • contribs) 03:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating Sources

message: Thanks wikipedia for monitoring this page. I have followed this page for a while as I am a member of this orginisaton and was surprised of the extent of vanalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.205.141 (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank You Wikipedia 

message: The above comment by Petition is not accurate. All facts presented on the Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. page are factual and backed by sources. The user mentions that other information can be found using a simple "Google Search." This user is welcome to add to this Wikipedia page if statements about the station can be backed by sources. The claims made against TV3 are found on the internet in the form of forums and blogs, which are not considered sources. The user should refrain from using blogs in lieu of primary sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasonras (talk • contribs) 08:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: blogs are not facts
Talk:Religious discrimination

message: Why are Mormons mentioned how they are? The article makes is seam that Mormons started in the US, did  polygamy, then cried to the supreme court. This is a horrible way to describe discrimination of Mormon, yes this hempen, the article  does not touch or mention the Mormons wars and massacre that lead to the deaths of hundreds of Mormons. LuxembourgLover (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mormons experienced a lot of discrimination in the United States and were run out of towns. It was not federal discrimination but it can still be added to this article. There are reliable sources for it. They would need to be added to the article. Plures caeli (talk) 10:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article does a horrible job on explaining Mormons
Talk:Dwarf wedgemussel

message: There is a public domain picture of the Dwarf wedgemussel at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?sourceTemplate=species_RptComprehensive.wmt&loadTemplate=species_RptImages.wmt&paging=&elKey=108301&save=false&page=1
I do not know how to post this, however.
:That image is not suitable for wikipedia because that image is for non-commercial purposes. --Snek01 (talk) 10:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Book of Lamentations

message: According to a story in the Babylonian Talmud, the 1st, 2nd, and 4th chapters are those cast into the fire by King Yehoyachin in Jerusalem at the time (that event is recounted is in Jeremiah). Subsequently, Jeremiah authored a 4th chapter, which (for some reason) was placed between the older chapters. According to this, the first four chapters were actually written prophetically, as the Temple in Jerusalem had not yet been destroyed. After the destruction, Jeremiah composed the fifth chapter, lamenting the actual destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.
I regret that at this point, I don't have any sources. They are easy enough to find, though, and I feel this story should make it into the article.
70.23.119.61 (talk) 03:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When Was Lamentations Composed? 

message: @EdJohnston, same thing, the user is violating WP:MOS/WTW and is refusing to read the policy as this edit shows in this article: . What will the user do once you removed the protection in the this article? Already, the user has made this new account, Tikki-Tembo -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: first of all, stop it. I have read wp:mos. this edit does not violate it in any way. Please interact with the content if you're going to follow me around and complain.if you're going to throw wp:mos eggs at me, back it up.  Tikki-Tembo (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: JudeccaXIII and Tikki-Tembo, please use the article talk page to discuss the rationale for the content change, not your concerns about other editors' behavior. EdJohnston (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tikki-Tembo, violation of WP:MOS/WTW, WP:EDITORIAL, & WP:LABEL here:  "However, conversely" -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 01:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  "conversely" is not a frowned upon word.Tikki-Tembo (talk) 01:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, I was thinking of controversially. Just remove however so it won't violate WP:MOS/WTW -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 01:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|WP:MOS/WTW]]
Talk:Names of John

message: Why multiple pages should not exist
There are many pages on the names of John. That's not bad structure if the pages have unique information that pertains to that name such as John the Presbyter. John the Evangelist and John of Patmos do not. All their information can be found on Authorship of the Johannine works. Having a duplicate page makes WP confusing, more work for editors, and each article will likely contain information the other does not, meaning users have to read both pages to get all the relevant information. It has already been decided by consensus that the Evangelist and Apostle shouldn't merge. The only advantage is for NPOV because The Evangelist, John of Patmos and the Apostle are not necessarily the same person. However, it is neither NPOV to have multiple articles because that implies multiple people. 
Why they should merge here
The cure for bias is to explain all the POVs so that information is not ignored. Merging to Names of John is a step towards that cure for NPOV. Those relevant issues can be fleshed out here fully in a centralized location where the same information isn't spread across multiple articles.
--Ephilei 21:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What, then, do you suggest? How can we change this article to be more NPOV? What is a better page to merge to? Let's compromise. Certainly Johannine  identity(ies) is ideally NPOV, but a mouthful to read. You're right, separate identities isn't a minority position, but single authorship is neither a minority position. Regardless of NPOV, separate articles is a organizational nightmare which is, personally, my frustration. --Ephilei 03:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Winfield, British Columbia

message: Isn't Winfield, with Oyama and ??, now combined into Lake Country, British Columbia; I've put the :Category:Communities within district municipalities in British Columbia for now because of this.Skookum1 21:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lake Country?

message: Did Winfield's old muni, therefore also the ward, actually have any Okanagan Lake watefront?  I'm thinking that would be Okanagan Centre, British Columbia of the four wards/former munis; I'll look on Lake Country's site to see if they have a map......if not, the :Category:Populated places on Okanagan Lake should be removed; I'll make the Okanagan Centre and Carr's landing community pages later on today.Skookum1 (talk) 04:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: on Okanagan Lake??
Talk:Raymond Wolf

message: 1.  Family background—parents, siblings, wife, children?
2.  High school education and sports?
3.  Texas Christian education and sports record?
4.  What did he do after retiring from coaching?
All assistance greatly appreciated.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More information needed

message: Although Wolf served in the United States Navy during World War II, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served overseas in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, :Category:American naval personnel of World War II was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:GTD-5 EAX

message: I noticed this article sitting as an uncompleted link, and wrote the description from memory. I worked on the GTD-5 from 1980 until 1997, and was one of the engineers present at original cutover. I have not had any luck finding quotable reference material for the information contained herein. If anyone has copies of the old Automatic Electric Journal, it would help.
Kww 21:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow.  This is an excellent article.  I wish I knew so much for the 1ESS switch and Panel switch articles I wrote.  Jim.henderson 20:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help with references please
Talk:Overmountain Men

message: Elmo37877 (talk) 18:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington County, North Carolina 

message: This article needs to include detailed information pertaining to the role of the Overmountain Men (including Issac Shelby who is featured within the Overmountain Men wiki) participation within Battle of Musgrove Mill that occurred just weeks prior to the Battle of Kings Mountain.Bee Cliff River Slob (talk) 16:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Battle of Musgrove Mill
Talk:Julius Eisenstein

message: Although the article mentions that Eisenstein clashed with Reform and Conservative, was he Orthodox and how have his works been treated by the Orthodox community? --רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 05:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orthodox?

message: According to his passport from 15 Mar 1899 & 15 Apr 1922 he was born on 21. November 1855 - this is also supported by his census from 1900 where ist birthdate ist given als November 1855. --Statistician (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: Otsar denim uminhagim http://www.hebrewbooks.org/37057
Otsar Drushim nivcharim http://www.hebrewbooks.org/2927
Otsar drashot http://www.hebrewbooks.org/37996
otsar maamrei chazal volume 1  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/2932  volume 2  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/41582
otsar maamrei tannakh http://www.hebrewbooks.org/3365
otsar midrashim  volume 1  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/2603  volume 2  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/2585
otsar masot http://www.hebrewbooks.org/2933
otsar vikukhim  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/2852
otsar zikhronot  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/6655
For the encyclopedia, use the Advanced search page with אוצר as the subject and start about page 13 of the results.
71.163.117.143 (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  on HebrewBooks
Talk:Cutting (transportation)

message: a better name for this article might be Cut slope.  that is the term used by highway engineers and its also less of a mouthful than the present name. The poor name of this present article may explain the paucity of incoming links.  one would expect dozens (if not hundreds) of links to this key concept from an encyclopaedia of this size. Anlace 21:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: possible name change

message: There are too many articles on the subjects "cut" and "fill" that all seem to cover the same topic. They are all small articles. I think they should be merged into one article with appropriate redirects.
*Cut and fill is 3 KB (508 words)
*Cut (earthmoving) is 2 KB (358 words)
*Cutting (transportation) is 1 KB (212 words)
*Embankment (transportation) is 1 KB (154 words)
*Fill dirt is 2 KB (384 words)
Can't these be merged into one article with the appropriate sections and redirects? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many stub articles on the same topic