Talk:Micro air vehicle

message: : HART program article makes no reference to MAVs whatsoever.  The diagrams likewise do not mention MAVs or depict them  (if they do show a MAV, it is drawn too small to see and is not labeled as such).  To be relevant as a reference article for the Micro Air Vehicle article, the HART discussion should detail how MAVs are a central part of the HART concept.  I also note that the HART article is written in the past tense, indicating that it is no longer an active DARPA program.  As such, it seems to have even less relevance to the Micro AIr Vehicle article which should have as references, seminal, in-development, or fielded MAVs involved.  To quote from the HART article, "The purpose of the program was to develop systems that could provide continuous, real-time, three-dimensional surveillance of large urbanized areas, using unmanned aerial vehicles."  Was HART implemented and fielded?  Was it ever anything that got farther than the drawing board.  I've seen hundreds of these concepts over the years that lost proponency and died... this looks like another.  Also, MAV's should not be able to roadkill or be used to get on locations that are not accessible.  By the DARPA definition, a MAV is a UAV, but a UAV is not necessarily a MAV.  The HART article fails the test to establish the centrality of MAVs to its core concept.  If you are pointing to the otherwise unidentified 17-pound (fully fueled) 13 inch diameter ducted fan "Micro Air Vehicle" (original Honeywell design) shown in the first figure of the HART article, that is a total misnomer as it does not fit the DARPA definition of a MAV (~15cm).  Just because some in the military have dubbed that a "Micro Air Vehicle" for political reasons, it is in no way indicative of the MAVs discussed in the Micro Air Vehicle article to which this talk page is attached.  Bottom line:  there are lots of program concepts which include MAVs (e.g. FCS) and maybe HART is another one, but the HART article does not make the case-- and Wikipedia readers are not supposed to have "inside information" to know that TRUE MAVs (not the Honeywell ducted fan) were perhaps used in HART.  Need to pick a better example, expand the HART article, or just leave out the reference as it adds little to the MAV article.Firewall (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2009

message: Apparently, DoD is funding "Bug-Like Robotic Drones Becoming More Bug-Like, With Bulging Eyes and Tiny, Sensing Hairs", as seen in this Oct 2011 article.  May be worthy of note in improving the article.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 06:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: More "bug-like" MAVs

message: Could information from sources ,  and  be somehow incorporated into this article? --93.139.140.11 (talk) 10:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  JHU research 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Micro air vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110210145920/http://www.darpa.mil/dso/thrusts/materials/multfunmat/nav/index.htm to http://www.darpa.mil/dso/thrusts/materials/multfunmat/nav/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)