Talk:A Farewell to Kings

message: I've always thought the fact that the record was slightly out of tune was common knowledge among Rush fans, and I've read it in guitar magazines in the past.  I no longer own those magazines, and to my surprise, I couldn't find information about it anywhere on the Internet.  Anyone with a musical ear can simply listen to a song from the album and then the same song played live, and hear the difference, so it's a true fact, but I can't find a way to verify it using a reputable Internet source.  If anyone else can do this, that would definately be good for the article.
:This is very hard to believe, as if Geddy doesn't sound enough like a chipmonk without begin speeded up, find the sources before adding it back if you can't find it on the interweb its probably because it didn't happen.  Also has anyone else got a problem with the interpertation of Farewell..? How does "the evolution of society from the days of medieval feudalism and autocratic monarchy, hence "a farewell to kings"" make any sense, since autocratic monarchies were ruled by, wait for it, kings?  It's written in the present tense so is it not about how ordinary people in western demoracies, since we got rid of monarchies hence "a farewell to kings", are responsible for who governs us, and if we let jerks get into power and allow them to screw everything up, well its really our own fault and we have to do something about it or we will be judged harshly by history?--KaptKos 09:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mastering Info 

message: I disagree with linking articles that are not about the song they are linked to. Therefore, I have removed them. "Cinderella Man" has nothing to do with Cinderella, other than having it in the name. I think that if a song is linked to an album, it should be about the song, such as "Cygnus X-1" and the majority of the Pink Floyd songs on Wikipedia. Spaceboy~ 03:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  articles linked using song listing 

message: This article reads as if it had written by a five year old.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ff1959 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of the problematic seems to have been removed. It is still accessible at . Some of it could be incorporated into the current article with proper references. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Quality 

message: For some reason, this article lists closer to the heart as the first video played on MuchMusic.  This is not the case, it was the enemy within
http://www.muchmusic.com/aboutus/faq/#programming  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.115.133 (talk) 16:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closer to the Heart 

message: The lede says that this album, along with Hemispheres and 2112, is a concept album, and part of a "post-apocalyptic trilogy". This does not make any sense, and is completely unsupported. I'm going to remove it until someone can provide a citation for it. MacBeth7622 (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept Album? 

message: Substituted at 01:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: The source says Charistgau does not like prog rock. If the source is reliable, that might be relevant to add to an article on the critic or (less likely) progressive rock. However, that statement by itself is not relevant to this album until it is connected to the album in some way. That connection is synthesis and cannot be added to the article.
:
The source you provided says he does not like prog rock. Let's call that source A. Other sources say the album is progressive rock. That's source B. The statement added here is, essentially, "Of course he didn't like it; it's progressive rock and he doesn't like progressive rock!" That's C. A + B = C. That is WP:SYN. The claim is not verifiable unless you provide an independent reliable source that directly supports the statement. - SummerPhDv2.0 20:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SYN]] on Charistgau 

message: Should the track list include the additional songs on the 40th anniversary reissue?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.34.188.85 (talk) 02:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  40th anniversary track listing