Talk:Sidekick

message: Merlin isn't Arthur's sidekick; he's his mentor. There should be a big fat  next to the wizard's place on the list. If anyone was Arthur's sidekick, it'd be his squire. The "knight and squire" dichotomy is probably a major influence on the whole sidekick concept, since that's essentially what Sancho Panza and Robin are. -- Poisonink (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merlin

message: I think that it should also mention the famous sidekicks in talk show hosts, like Kevin Eubanks on Jay Leno for example.
: I agree; I think that this page needs to be a disambiguation page leading to Sidekick (fiction) and Sidekick (entertainment) at the least. There are other products that have been named "Sidekick" that should be disambiguated as well. Telestylo 08:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: talk show hosts

message: It would seem that an older version of the OED may have had that origin of side kick (From an O. Henry story) however there is now not any definition or definitive etymology for "sidekick" in the OED. However several word sites have featured the word. And in OED, the work "kick" defines as a pocket.Sbwoodside 03:40, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology uncertain 

message: * I've moved the list of sidekicks to a subpage - since it was bound to grow forever, as every Harry Potter and Pokemon fan in the universe added to it (though I did attempt to make it clear that it was a list of notable sidekicks).
* I've created a disambiguation page for sidekick - since there are probably more uses for the term out there.
* I think it's worth keeping the fictional and real sidekick pages together - since the root of the term is the same (and so is the essential meaning).
If anyone feels strongly that it's the wrong thing - please at least explain why before reverting. Thanks. Megapixie 07:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the page

message: While true that gay sidekicks can be used to emphasize the fact that the hero is masculine, this is not always right, nor correct, and should perhaps be expressed in a different manner.
Pro primo, gay is not the counterpoint to masculine, feminine is. Many times, the "flamingly open gay" is not homosexual (nor happy) at all, but instead, perceived as such by a heterosexually normative mind. Of course, the manners and the temper of the character is meant to emphasize the masculinity of the hero.
Pro secondo, when it is explicitly said that the sidekick character is homosexual, the hero is perceived as more straight, not more masculine.
--Hakeliha 09:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well.. batman's robin is gay, no doubt about that.. --88.234.235.223 (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay sidekick

message: Since you can't read, I'll read it for you. The lead section says SOME and WELL-KNOWN. I will continue to remove your vanispamicruftisement additions of questionables such as Harry Potter and non-notables such as Fanboy. I've been here nearly five years, I'm not going anywhere.
Your edit summary of "Ron and Hermione are both internationaly [sic] well known sidekicks, as is Tails from the Sonic series who is as equally well known as Luigi from the Mario series." is dubious at best. Ron and Hermione are not sidekicks in the traditional sense. One is a sidekick, two makes a posse. The answer then is to remove Mario as well. OTHERCRAPEXISTS is never a good argument. Your next revert gets you reported. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Inclusion is okay, just not appropriate to overfill the lead paragraph. There are hundreds of thousands of sidekicks both in fiction and real life, this is a recurring theme in the monomyth, as old as humankind itself. Real and fictional examples including Indy Jones' Sallah, Chewbacca, Ed McMahon, Paul Shaffer and so on would be much more appropriate, as greater noteworthies, yet I don't add them to the lead precisely because they don't belong there. The IP is wheel-warring just for the sake of it, undoing good edits along with contested ones. Your blocking threat, by the way, is overkill for such an issue. Semi-protecting the page, however, is welcome. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit warring by tendentious dynamic multiple IP user 78.145.39.214 and posse (not sidekick[s]) 

message: I think sidekicks can be classified into two types: 1)The Robin: The young sidekick to an older hero/villian learning the ropes in order to become the hero of the next generation. 2)The Watson: The standard assistant to the hero/villain more commonly seen such as Spock, Tonto, or the famous Doctor Watson. Do you think this information should be added to the main article? Ztyran (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a third type, the comic bumbling fool, typical of the B Westerns. Wschart (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Two Types of Sidekicks 

message: One or two examples of well-known sidekicks should be sufficient. This article is degenerating into a list of sidekick, of which there are thousands of examples in just American popular culture. I recommend deleting this list as it serves no real purpose. Wkharrisjr (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no objections over the next several days, I will be deleting the list of animated sidekicks are this adds nothing to the article.Wkharrisjr (talk) 17:00, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. It looks like an anonymous user readded the list sometime in 2015 by restoring an old version of the page. I will try to restore some of the lost edits in the coming days and also intend to redelete the list unless someone objects (and even if the list is kept, it should at the very least be pared back significantly). Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is degenerating into a list

message: I think it is odd that almost all the examples given are fictional. The only exceptions from real life are the TV talk show hosts and (though some would disagree) Moses' Aaron. We do have heroes in real life -- do none of them have sidekicks? By "heroes", I suggest not merely war heroes, but any sort of leader, whether in the political or religious areas, or a famous activist. Perhaps even an entertainer -- would a backup band be considered a sidekick? The Supremes to Diana Ross, for example? As a side point, I'd suggest that a protege is NOT a sidekick -- Gandhi's Nehru, or Jesus' Peter, for examples. A sidekick is not merely a student or follower, but a companion. --Keeves (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real life 

message: Removed that racist and offensive reference from article.   I will report it to Kobe Bryant himself, media and anti-racist organizations, in case any troll was thinking in rewriting it.200.75.126.97 (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  */Kobe Bryant is no fictitious sidekick from nobody/* 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sidekick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100220053120/http://www.sffworld.com/authors/h/hay_noelle/articles/evolutionofsidekick1.html to http://www.sffworld.com/authors/h/hay_noelle/articles/evolutionofsidekick1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100316094401/http://jobseekersofamerica.com/2009/08/01/snuff-sidekicks-and-the-apocalypse-suite/ to http://jobseekersofamerica.com/2009/08/01/snuff-sidekicks-and-the-apocalypse-suite/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified