lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amoraim

message: Removed the following, because Eleazar Kalir lived in the early Middle Ages.
* Eleazar Kalir (date unknown), liturgist and poet.
đyes    dostum  hadi  bana  çus--188.59.149.212 (talk) 09:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleazar Kalir 

message: I am reposting the following request from User  on my user talk page for wider notification:
:I was thinking of trying to stimulate development of a series of articles on Gemara concepts and doctrines, maybe to help children or newcomers to Gemara with explanations of some fundamental concepts that recur throughout the Gemara. Some examples might be articles on Yiush, Chazakah, Ta'aninun (as in "Ta'aninun L'Yoresh"), Eidim Zomemin (forgive my awful transliterations), Migu, etc., etc. Maybe we could even create a category or subcategory for it. I created Breira in this vein. As I don't have the experience or expertise in Wikipedia to know what to do to best develop this idea, I figured I'd come to you for your opinions on: (1) whether it's a good idea; and (2) How to best go about implementing it. Thanks Sh76us (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for Talmud articles
Talk:Z.O.E. Dolores, I

message: this was a pretty good series.--D-Boy 02:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  need an expansion 
Talk:Papal slippers

message: :Pope Paul VI was the last pope to use the Papal Slippers in liturgical ceremonies. Pope John Paul I did not serve the papacy long enough to wear them. He was also the last pope to be buried in them upon death.
That does not appear to make sense to me.  Was Paul VI or John Paul I the last pope to be buried in the papal slippers?  Was John Paul I entitled to wear them for burial, but not in life?  Or is this paragraph out of order? Jdavidb 15:58, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry.  I think I clarified it in the article just now.  The Papal Slippers haven't been banned and both Pope John Paul I and II could have worn them in life but chose not to.  Pope John Paul I was buried in the Papal Slippers.  Pope John Paul II made a personal decision not to wear it for himself in death, but left the question over its use by future popes to his successors.  --Gerald Farinas 16:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did not wear them, but was buried in them?
Talk:Craterus

message: It would be nice if the sources of the article were given at its end. -- 84.146.131.53 16:01, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: "Some scholars have speculated that what Alexander actually said was that he gave his kingdom 'to Craterus', another possible interpretation of his last words."
This assertion is supported by a citation, but I don't think the cited website 
http://www.livius.org/pen-pg/perdiccas/perdiccas.htm
is very convincing. I have not read any "scholars" who speculate so; I have only read this in historical fiction. I have therefore deleted the relevant paragraph, pending reference to a more authoritative source. 
El barty (talk) 00:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'To the Strongest'
Talk:Carmine (color)

message: Nearly all of the page seems to have been copied from ,
so I have removed that text and added an entry to WP:CP. heycam 00:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: What is the "" at the bottom of this article?  I do not see it in the editable text. --VMS Mosaic 06:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraneous {{{2}}} 

message: I clicked onto this page for Deep Carmine, but it's not on the page, it's just in the list of pinks (even though it's orange). This is misleading, and I want that color's code... If someone can, please fix this. It should be on the page, obviously. --174.19.234.173 (talk) 05:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deep Carmine 

message: Entries in List of colors: A–F contained links to this page.
The entries are :
* Carmine pink
* Carmine red
* Deep carmine
* Deep carmine pink
* Light carmine pink
An entry in List of colors: G–M contained a link to this page.
The entry is :
* Medium carmine
I don't see any evidence that these colors are discussed in this article and plan to delete them from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries
If someone decides that these colors should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible removal from list
Talk:St. Louis Cardinals

message: Add 2019 to Central Division titles in infobox. Hawthorneabendsen (talk) 04:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: this page is no longer protected and may be edited directly. — xaosflux Talk 17:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 30 September 2019 

message: The cap insignia logo in the infobox is incorrect, there is a new version for the 2020 season that was revealed in 2019. SportsFan007 (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cap insignia logo 

message: I'd like to see a citation for the team ever being called the "Baseball Cardinals". The NFL team was called the "Football Cardinals" because they were not the "baseball" Cardinals. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an article from Sports Illustrated in 1964 that refers to both teams as such. Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The next question is, now that there is no such thing as a St. Louis Cardinals football team, does anyone still call the baseball team the "baseball Cardinals"? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 09:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Herostratus (talk) 13:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baseball Cardinals? 

message: Change uniform number to 13 (previous number held). 24 is retired for Hall Of Fame Manager Whitey Herzog for years. 2601:603:680:A5A0:511D:3285:89FC:9939 (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited template to show Matt Carpenter using his prior number from 2012-2021. 24 is retired for Whitey Herzog, per both team sources and later in this Article. 2601:603:680:A5A0:C141:C634:1210:F48 (talk) 04:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt Carpenter Uniform Number
Talk:Péter Erdő

message: "Cardinal" in the name as it is adheres to normal naming standards and our MoS. Erdõ seems correct according to http://www.cardinalrating.com/cardinal_29.htm http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/berdo.html. I therefore oppose. violet/riga (t) 16:23, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Oldman River

message: Why are the Belly and Waterton rivers grouped together? More importantly, who was it that wrote in the article that the Oldman Dam was never constructed ("Oldman Dam was abandoned")??  I have removed that statement from the article for if the Dam wasn't constructed, what is that HUGE freakin cement wall downstream from that huge reserviour that flooded out the 3 river confluence??  Do all those government signs that say "OLDMAN DAM" take you somewhere else?  It IS there, I've spent countless hours there and it shows up on Google Earth like a sore thumb.  Get your facts straight please!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grizzlydog (talk • contribs) 12:33, December 21, 2005
:It was added by DragonflySixtyseven on 18 August 2005. -- Kmsiever 19:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldman Dam

message: Given that the 2013 floods of the Oldman River are less notable than the 1995 floods, I propose that this section be removed or that it include other floods that were worse or as bad as this one (e.g. 1995, 2005). —Kmsiever (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2013 floods
Talk:Schur's lemma

message: Is the Schur lemma mentioned on Simple module the same as the one here? MarSch 16:45, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schur lemma for simple modules 

message: In differential geometry, Schur's Lemma usually refers to the result that if the sectional curvature of a Riemannian manifold does not depend on the choice of 2-plane in any tangent space, then it also does not depend on the point in the manifold, i.e., the manifold has constant curvature. Shouldn't this be added here? 128.138.64.92 21:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schur's lemma in differential geometry 

message: Given a matrix representation does the following hold or not?
(ir)reducible matrix <=> (ir)reducible representation
Where can I find a (concise?) proof of schur's lemma in matrix form?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.193.2.37 (talk) 00:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matrix form 

message: "This holds more generally for any algebra R over an algebraically closed field k and for any simple module M that is at most countably-dimensional: the only linear transformations of M that commute with all transformations coming from R are scalar multiples of the identity."
This is not true without the additional assumption that k is uncountable. Counterexample: the algebra of rational functions over a countable algebraically closed field, considered as a module over itself. AlexShamov (talk) 09:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  <math>\operatorname{End}_A M = k</math>
Talk:Flight data recorder/old merge talk

message: These sections are obsolete, closed for no concensus Meggar 06:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I disagree with the merge.  A merge with black box (systems) would be more appropriate.
- JH
Jep..... merge!!!!
--QA
Yes, I agree that the black box article should be merged under this article.
--Sepheris
I disagree with a this merge. The Black box (transportation) page was made only a few days ago by a new user who must not have noticed that there were already pages for 
Black Box (disambiguation),
Cockpit voice recorder, and
Event recorder. New information should go into one of those pages. Meggar 05:05, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that should improve disambiguation. This Black Box idea is a powerful meme. The Black box (transportation) article serves a purpose in as much as it explains why a technical article can’t be written on the subject, and perhaps will avert another round of merging efforts. Meggar 04:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Many opinions, no consensus. Merge tag removed. Meggar 01:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge?

message: I think Flight recorder and Cockpit voice recorder could be merged with this article. - Matthew238
: The FDR and CVR have always been separate independent units with different inputs, different storage media, and different requirements. No use merging them. Some of flight recorder might me merged but it also mentions other units like QAR and the possible future video recorders.
: I also believe the articles should remain separate. The devices are quite distinct in their functionality. Further, someone looking for CVR would presumably be redirected to Flight Data Recorder if the articles were merged. This is not the way Wikipedia should work. It should retain all the virtues of a conventional encyclopedia with the advantages that hyperlinking provides. Far better to rely on links between the articles than merge them. treesmill 02:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Do not merge: they are two distinct items.  Certainly, a link is proper.  --CoolGuy 18:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge with  Flight Recorder and disambigulate from Black Box.  CVR should at the very least be cross linked.  At the moment there is no link between these articles.  Thoglette 15:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  another merge?
Talk:Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah

message: The content from :Muhammad Quli Qutub Shah has been merged into this article (both were almost identical). Chirag 19:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Merger 

message: The legend.  Clearly seen as a legendary figure. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhagmati
Talk:List of house styles

message: This is a strange article.  I don't know what the original point was.  I've changed it into something a little more coherent, but it could use a lot more work.  If house styles from other countries can't be added, shouldn't the title be changed?
Mothperson 17:13, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a bunch of disambiguated links to improve things a bit... and the House styles category, which I've been working on (largely before even finding this page (doh!), but the results were about the same).  I suppose a name change might be in order... they're all American/Western European styles, but they are creeping around the world I imagine.  --W.marsh 17:05, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've wondered about that.  The creeping, I mean.  I appreciate your improvements.  --Mothperson cocoon 17:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Over time I've radically improved and lengthened the article Architectural_style. This could now be merged into it. All House style is a subset of architectural style generally, and the same styles have been applied to houses, commercial and civic buildings, etc. It is the style that matters, not the function of the building. Bards (talk) 19:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it really necessary to have three links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tudorbethan_architecture right next to each other? Pharod42 05:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Links

message: If interested, see Talk:List of house types where I've posted a comment about merging the two articles --W.marsh 21:45, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge talk

message: Austin Style - popular in Texas.  Involves local lime stone, local red clay brick and lots of local natural cedar on the exterior as well as hipped roofs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.170.212.28 (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Add Styles

message: House, like any building, can only be categorized by type, never by style; style is something which can be applied to any type of house/building - this is what they teach you in arch school. However, I noticed that this common mistake in categorization is prevalent online, sometime even in some official org. lingo. (There is entire Guide for house style printed by historical preservation office at Longbeach.org - and since they, historical preservation office, must have bunch of experts in art and arch with them, it is mindboggling.) ౪ Santa ౪99° 18:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia goes by what reputable sources say. Can you demonstrate that the majority of reputable sources make that distinction? - Donald Albury 21:53, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "House.... can only be categorized by type, never by style" - I'm not at all not convinced that's true. Obscurasky (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type not style 

message: The picture is not a Foursquare house.  Foursquare houses have hipped roofs. 174.17.163.219 (talk) 16:46, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foursquare house
Talk:Measurement

message: Baculometry appears to merely be one archaic form of measurement, which would be best merged here. BD2412 T 03:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is so archaic, and we have so little of a description of the method, I suggest that a merge to the author of the seminal text would be a better idea; so, merge to Daniel Schwenter. Klbrain (talk) 21:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the text of Baculometry is already present at Daniel Schwenter. This is almost a redirect situation. Joyous! | Talk 03:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from [[Baculometry]] 

message: Measurement conversion table 96.43.180.121 (talk) 20:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics 

message: I know that quantum measurement is contentious so I want to say a bit more about my edits of this section.
I removed sentence:
Before a measurement is made, a quantum system is simultaneously described by all values in a range of possible values,  
This is not correct as can be seen by reading the rest of the paragraph. Measuring a quantum state puts the system in a new state corresponding to the value measured. So obviously then it is obviously not in a state with "all values".
I replaced it with some content derived from and referenced to A. Messiah's book, that addresses the same concept in a more correct way.
I also moved the last sentence up and connected it to the one on "collapse". Penrose, cited in the article talks about both sentences so now the missing citation tag is not needed. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum measurement 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ahlluhn (talk) 00:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment
Talk:Army One

message: On 23 Mar 2005, User:84.66.195.243 added "Wherever Army One flies, it is met on the ground by at least one Soldier in full dress uniform."
But the soldier in the picture isn't. Did this policy change at some point, or is it simply wrong? —wwoods 17:34, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, my thought is that is states "when it flies" as opposed to "when it flew"; that might be the caveot.  Just my 3¢.  —  THOR 17:48, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that means it is met by a soldier in full dress after the presidential helicopter lands.  The soldier in the picture isn't in full uniform probably because Nixon was taking off, rather than landing. GoCardinal 01:57, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: "Note the Army Sergeant First Class standing at the doorway, instead of the Marine as usually seen after 1976."
This note seems kinda silly to me.  Marines are seen outsite of the helicopter when the president lands because that aircraft is Marine One.  They changed which service ran the aircraft, not just which servicemember stood outside the craft.  Thoughts?  —  THOR 16:04, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Caption changed. GoCardinal 01:55, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army/Marine 

message: The picture cannot be "Army One" (or any other "One") because if Nixon had already resigned, then he is no longer President and by definition the aircraft carrying him cannot have a "One" designation.72.82.160.130 06:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Picture Cannot Be "Army One"

message: Would this be a good source? http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/roadshow/archive/200902A21.html PBS Antique Roadshow, but since they were trying to sell or valuate these items, I'm not so sure how accurate the info. is.like this statement "APPRAISER: Army One at that time was flown by the Army. And in 1976 that unit was disbanded, and the Marine Corps took over the unit, which is now Marine One."
Also, would PBS images ever be considered "public domain"-or free-use?Housewifehader (talk) 22:47, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments requested
Talk:Ecoinformatics

message: Could it be explained how the ecoinformatics differs from any other multi-disciplinary research (apart from its area)?
Pavel Vozenilek 17:49, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I ask because one could replace the word "ecoinformatics" in the article with other research and it may still make sense. Could there be concrete examples? Pavel Vozenilek 19:39, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a multi-disciplinary research?

message: This article's content should be merged into Environmental informatics, as they cover the exact same subject, and the latter is the one that "wins" in term of, you know, having any references at all. Tagging as such. LjL (talk) 16:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Environmental informatics]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Branchiobdellid (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ECOL 4950- Senior Seminar
Talk:Jean-Claude Turcotte

message: I can see the two pictures being of the same person, if they are separated by a few years and his face is not collapsing in on itself in the one above. silsor 20:54, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
*I knew the Associated Press couldn't have been wrong.  So it is a photograph of Cardinal Turcotte. --Gerald Farinas 03:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Creed (band)

message: Some conspiracy theories regarding why the band broke up? 2600:100C:B24C:7323:BC52:AE3C:C559:AFAB (talk) 17:16, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:NOTFORUM. CJ-Moki (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did the band breakup?
Talk:Isaac Roberts

message: I think that there's too much detail about his equipment integrated into the life section.  It can sometimes seem a bit random, and it's almost always unnecessary.
For example:
:Isaac Roberts married his first wife, Ellen Anne, in 1875, making him the son-in-law of Anthony Cartmell. In 1878, Roberts had a 7-inch refractor at his home in Rock Ferry, Birkenhead.
It seems a bit random to me to go straight from him marrying his wife to saying he has a 7-inch refractor.  IMO, it would be a lot more effective to have two seperate sections (maybe 'Life' and 'Equipment'?). -Frazzydee|✍ 18:28, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Roberts's exact birth date is disputed, and different biographies about him specify different dates." But looking at the url you give in this article ( section Obituary of Isaac Roberts) all bio except the one from the Proceedings of the Royal Society give January 27 as birth date. I found a scan of the proceedings and the date is really 27 not 17 as stated in the transcription of the RS obituary, unless there is other independant source which gave 17, it look like a transcription error rather a disputed date. phe 04:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, you're definitely right.  I don't remember exactly why I wrote that the date was disputed, but it seems to be almost definitely because of that error. -Frazzydee|✍ 05:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed birth date
Talk:Cuisine of New York City

message: i believe that this article needs some work. The links are not really helping. I realy only want to learn about New York Cuisine, not regional cuisines of New York.Birdie1999 (talk) 23:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Work!!!!!! 

message: Most sections of this article consist only of lists, so I think a extended prose section on Chino-Latino cuisine is not in keeping with the page style. At the same time, I think the content is most useful in the context of an article on Chino-Latino cuisine, which is why I've moved it to the newly created Chinese Latin American cuisine article. Wikiacc (¶) 19:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chino-Latino cuisine 

message: A series of IP editors have continued to insist that this article capitalize every word in the name of a dish, which seems to me to go against MOS:CAPS and the names of the dishes' actual articles. I am not sure what their reasoning is. An explanation is most welcome. Wikiacc (¶) 00:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Abul Hasan Qutb Shah

message: Some of the material on this page was copied from a page on the Vepachedu Educational Foundation. This text is released under the GFDL, and is not a copyright violation. For further information, see Talk:Qutb Shahi dynasty#Vepachedu information. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 18:34, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
--Singersiz (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: hello, contributers. plz edit with accurate information about successor/consort/offspring/royal anthem/father/mother.
someone has typed gibberish.
Vk i maverick (talk) 22:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  abul hasan qutb shah bio 

message: Abulhasan 45.124.142.82 (talk) 14:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bdj 

message: tana Shah was very warlike and when the armies of the Great Mogul overrun Golconda Sultanate his nation sought refuge in the diamond mines until the conflict ended until all the realm was under the imperial flag of the Mogul Empire.
09:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  refuge in diamond mines