Talk:Ojos del Salado

message: This group of mountaineers has a museum and stuff but I don't know anything about them. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a reliable source? 

message: Based on a more comprehensive survey of sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just undertook a major expansion 

message: Wondering if we need an explanation in text for this edit, in case sources disagree. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have access to the latter source. Does it claim the ascent was made by all members? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This source says  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be good to check Wojsznis. Polish source states that only two climbers went to the top.  In fact the Polish source strongly implies the others went eslewhere at the same time: . Note the dates. It is unlikely Paryski would climb both mountains on the same day... PS. Cited source is Ostrowski 1984. PPS. Having translated the German quotation, it does not imply they all climbed each mountain, but that the expedition did. Polish text goes into more details and clarifies that they worked in two 2-men teams, and sometimes each team climbed a different mountain. I hope that makes it clear that the German text was initially used incorrectly (to make a claim that is not clearly supported by it wording). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably best to remove the German reference, then, which I have done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement between about the Polish climbers 

message: Dunno if it's worth a mention: This source about how research in the region is almost entirely under foreign leadership. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:36, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source on research 

message: This book talks about 100m wide lake at 6390m elevation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which lake? 

message: - as per your request on my user talk page, I'll give this a pre-FAC look. Apologies if any of these comments don't make much sense; I'm trying to split my attention between this article and the Kansas City Chiefs game on TV
* "Topo map Highest mountain: Highest Mountain in Chile" - is this the intended infobox code, because it does not seem right to me
* "Waterbodies found at 6,600 metres (21,700 ft) elevation are the highest lakes of the world; if considered lakes they may be the highest lakes in the world." - I think this needs rephrased - it is fairly convoluted with the first part essentially stating that the waterbodies are the highest lakes, but the second part says that if these waterbodies were to be classified as lakes they would be the highest lakes in the world
* "the mountain has extremely dry conditions, which prevent the formation of glaciers" - but we do note that there are small, sheltered or isolated glaciers. So maybe rephrase to "which prevent the formation of widespread glaciers" or "substantial glaciers" or something like that?
* Isolation is only present in the infobox; should be mentioned in the body as well
* 13 see also links seems a little excessive; I would recommend trimming these a bit before an FAC
* "BAKER, P. E.; GONZALEZ-FERRAN, O.; REX, D. C." - this shouldn't be in all-caps
This is in good shape otherwise. Hog Farm  Talk 22:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks. Only other article that comes to mind is Mount Hudson, and only for a POV-balance evaluation (how much space to assign to each eruption) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-FAC review