lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lin Thorp

message: Is this line correct?
:Thorp won 89 per cent of the preselection vote to fill the vacancy caused by the retirement of stalwart Nick Sherry. She was appointed to the Senate by a joint sitting of the Tasmanian Parliament on 20 June 2012, and sworn in on 21 June.
It seems odd that a state parliament would be responsible for an appointment to the federal Senate? -- Chuq (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's how it works, although since 1977 the parliaments have been constitutionally required to choose a member of the party of the departing senator. Antony Green goes into more detail here. Frickeg (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appointment to Senate
Talk:Claire dela Fuente

message: Awards
Double Platinum Record awards:
* "Nakaw na Pag-ibig" (single)
* "Minsan-Minsan" (single)
* Sayang (album)
* The Best of Claire (album)
* The Best of Claire (CD)
Gold Record awards:
* Nangingiti ang Puso Ko (album)
* "Nangingiti ang Puso Ko" (single)
* "Makikita Mo" (single)
* Mga Bulong ng Pag-ibig (album)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Carl Francis (talk • contribs) 09:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Working on source
Talk:Moamoria rebellion

message: @ComparingQuantities Hello, I observed that you deleted content from the 'Background' section of the article without providing a comprehensive edit summary to explain the reason behind the removal. Could you kindly share the rationale behind this action? It is essential for all editors to have a transparent understanding of changes made to facilitate accurate and collaborative content development. Your clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
AMNR0011 (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The removed part is a summarized repetition on what's there is the following sub-section. I found it as unnecessary additional text. ComparingQuantities (talk) 08:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  for clarifying your perspective regarding the content removal. AMNR0011 (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Heernt

message: Hey, I recently found out about this band due to their album release and as Guiliana was already a known figure to me (still no article about him, though!) I thought it'd be a good time to start this page. Hope it qualifies as a decent enough stub (my first creation). I'd say that the top-priority task right now is to find and give some precise enough genres for the band (a few really good sentences can be found on homepages etc.) and cite them correctly (of which I am so far no adept).  ITAL 13:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreword
Talk:2006–07 Chelsea F.C. season

message: It would be great if this article can have reliable independent sources for the information it presents. Until(1 == 2) 14:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:User Hokkaido

message: I'm going through and creating a prefectural user block for all 47 prefectures.  This is the only one (that I could find) that exists for the time being so sorry but I'm going to change it with the standard format.
Manmaru 14:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Thanks. -- Kleinzach 01:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Armed Occupation Act

message: Hi.  I removed some text that appears to be copied from the source page (specifically, the second paragraph of "Biographical/Historical").  If this text is directly from the Armed Occupation Act (and, hence, in the public domain), I apologize; it does not appear so.  If it is not, it should be paraphrased or rewritten (perhaps with text from the actual Act, if a copy is available!).  Cheers, Iamunknown 14:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  Thanks!  --Iamunknown 02:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conscientiousness

message: Editing and/or contributing to Wikipedia is a nightmare. This contribution you're reading is most likely in violation of a plethora of "rules". Should my humble attempt at making a contribution trigger fulminant "brain rash" in individuals known as "Wikipedia-professionals", I encourage him/her/(insert other gender pronoun at will) to delete and/or edit as you see fit. 
Quote from article:
"(ADHD does not go away with age[citation needed]..." 
Ok, here's a citation: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/guidelines.html
"The primary care clinician should recognize ADHD as a chronic (long-standing) condition..."
Rettetasten (talk) 02:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavior - Development 

message: This article should acknowledge in the opening paragraph that the word "conscientious" has two distinct meanings (as confirmed in the Wiktionary entry). The other definition being that a conscientious person is someone whose actions are highly determined by their stated moral values (the opposite of a hypocrite, you might say). It should be neutral as to which of these meanings is more prevalent in popular usage. 118.211.36.115 (talk) 01:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two definitions 

message: Regarding this edit, which added the part in italics:
:
the author has since gracefully followed up to explain that the added text was based on the already cited reference (Steel et al. 2008): 
:
However, I don't see such a conclusion on that page. Rather, the authors state there that . And while they note that , they otherwise do not express such a ranking. 
As for interpreting Table 2 directly to arrive at conclusions like "the role of conscientiousness is relatively minor", that's clearly discouraged under WP:OR, especially so given that it does not directly report correlations with overall SWB but rather with six related dimensions: happiness, life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect, overall affect, quality of life. (Personally I am also curious why the values for "Q statistic - apparently referring to Tukey's range test as a measure of differences between the analyzed papers - differ so widely for these six dimensions, with many "p < .0001" values alongside e.g. "p =.4029" for the neuroticism vs happiness correlation that the authors highlight as being particularly strong;  but that's off-topic here too.)
What's more, in the introduction the authors highlight an earlier widely cited meta analysis which did in fact report correlation with overall SWB directly, with highest (absolute) absolute values for neuroticism and conscientiousness:
That's another illustration why Wikipedia's WP:NOR policy makes good sense here. Actually we even need to attribute the existing summary in the article better to the Steel et al. paper - I'll do so now.
Lastly, on a stylistic matter, editorializing phrases like "It should be noted" are discouraged in Wikipedia articles, see MOS:EDITORIAL. And WP:WEASEL discourages vague formulations like "relatively minor" in favor of more concrete statements or direct quotes. 
Regards, HaeB (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship with subjective well-being
Talk:State College Area High School

message: I'm sorry, these items just aren't notable for the school. Mind you, I attended this high school, and had similar achievements myself (e.g., PAML). If they are included, they can't be in this sprawling list format that's out to make it a boosterish type of thing. Do we really need to include each and every instance of people achieving something at this school? It's a WP:WALL problem - no one cares except people who already attend. The Evil Spartan 14:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Multiple attempts have been made to implement a wholesale removal of the Awards and Recognition section. In one case, the editor involved invoked a non-existent policy restricting inclusion of "information will not be relevant in 100 years." In both cases, a biased essay called "Wikipedia:Schoolcruft" was referenced as "justification" for removal of the entire section and all of its many sources. Having read this essay, there are a handful of items that often appear in school articles -- such as lists of teachers and details and ratings of items served in the school cafeteria -- that are non-encyclopedic and for which there is strong consensus that such material should be removed. In this case, the editor in question uses this one-sided essay to justify extensive details regarding the awards and other recognition received by the school and its academic and athletic programs. A review of the overwhelming majority of school articles that are nominated for deletion and end with a result of 'keep shows that it is exactly these achievements of school students, athletic and academic teams that is a substantial and decisive factor in demonstrating school notability. Discuss specific issues with specific items on talk page. In a rather circular abuse of an essay of already limited use, the editor in question has added his removal of this sourced material to the "Ways to spot Schoolcruft" laundry list as an example of "Endless lists, divided annually, of duxes and other students who have achieved, academically." Though I'm still not sure what a "dux" is, even after reading the definition, it's clear that none are listed here. This list of awards and achievements is indeed divided by years, a rather reasonable means to section off groups among the many awards the school has received; I'm sure that other alternative groupings could be considered. It is certainly possible that a reasoned case could be made to remove some of the items on the list based on actual Wikipedia policy, but there is no justification for wholesale removal of the entire list, and referencing a biased essay to which the editor has added his own actions as evidence proves -- and accomplishes -- absolutely nothing. Alansohn 14:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SCHOOLCRUFT]]
Talk:Glufosinate

message: I think the article on DL-Phosphinotricin should be merged to this article - the content overlaps significantly. A separate subesection on the salt should be sufficient in my opinion.--Golden Wattle  talk 02:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jytdog (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the merge! Did you look at the TP of DL-Phosphinotricin? It was largely written by some very lazy students and some of the sourcing was very poor. Are you sure that the PAN is RS? SmartSE (talk) 12:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: yes i did see the talk page of that article. student editors are such a mixed bag.  About PAN, we use it on a bunch of herbicide/pesticide articles; they are generally good summaries of uses, tox, etc.  This one is a bit old, so I wouldn't object to replacing it and editiing with a newer source.  The EU reviewed glufosinate in 2007 and Bayer submitted further data that the EU reviewed in 2012 - those reviews would probably be better.  Jytdog (talk) 13:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger from DL-Phosphinotricin 

message: As far as I can tell, the NH2 group in the ball-and-stick diagram seems to be shown incorrectly as an NH3 group. Is anyone in a position to fix this? JonRichfield (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball-and-stick error? 
Talk:Argument from miracles

message: Now, the article looks like "Criticism of mircles" and not as "Argument from miracles" - it should present the argument itself thoroughly and based on relevant sources, and then have a criticism section of proportional length.--Ioannes Pragensis 14:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NPOV]] 

message: I have two suggestions for the article. if no one be disagree i wii perform them in a few days:
* first of all why not using template god arguments instead of two other templates? god arguments  has link to page Argument from miracles as the same as two other templates. using these two templates links this article to some irrelevant articles and also repeated ones.
* and second one is  that why not using david hume opinions instead of dawkins opinions? hume is a great philosopher and the first one who seriously has criticized this argument.--ایرانی (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion
Talk:Joel Hardin

message: There are very few serious, experienced tracking teachers in this country, indeed, the world.  Joel Hardin is one of them.  I would say one of the top two in the U.S.  This alone justifies the article.  Yes, this article needs improvement.  That will come later as more and more people come across this article.  After all, that is the point of Wikipedia, is it not?  Please give this article a chance. --Lensim 14:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article should NOT be deleted

message: I believe this article satisfies  notability on the following grounds:
# The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field.
I will remove the notability tag from the page.
--Lensim 01:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  now that the article is at AfD you can participate. To learn how read this. Lightburst (talk) 21:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ekasarana Dharma

message: The authors Maheswar Neog and Satyendranath Sarma have given instances and demonstrated where the Bhagavata of Sankardeva differs from the original.  So, they are not merely opinions.  User:Sankararkinkar has reverted an edit where this is made clear.  This is a request to the editor not to revert changes without a basis or a discussion here. Chaipau (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion or demonstration 

message: Dimbeswar Neog is cited in the text as having asserted that Sankardeva has not deviated from the original Bhagavata.  On looking up the cited work, I found just the opposite to be true.  This is what he writes: "If there could be any question of mutation or affiliation still, it could have been with the Gita and the Bhagawat direct which Sankardew read and interpreted in his own way, at once original and new." (p.3).  Therefore Neog leaves open the question of mutations from the original Bhagavata.  That Sankardeva had brought forth an original religion as well as philosophy is admitted by the founder of Sankar Sangha, Haladhar Bhuyan: "Sri Neog now definitely shows that Sankardew’s philosophy is his own and that his religion is as original as that of any great preacher of the world; and he substantiates his views by precisely quoting authentic sources." (p.vi)  All the authors quoted in text Dimbeswar Neog, Maheswar Neog and Satyendranath Sarma agree that Sankardeva's philosophy was original, though pieced together from Advaita and Samkhya relics.  Chaipau (talk) 14:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, the quote attributed to Dimbeswar Neog ("What is to be found by searching as many...") is actually Dimbeswar Neog's translation of Ramananda Dvija, son of Madhavdeva's nephew and a biographer of Sankardeva.  Chaipau (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimbeswar Neog 

message: Hi , you recently reverted an edit I made to the short description of this article, stating that it was unexplained. My reasoning for the edit is that the s/d as it exists now is insufficiently succinct. As a s/d, it should be as short as possible, that is why I abridged it. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for the information.  The s/d you inserted was too general not sufficiently precise, so updated.  Chaipau (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description edit revert
Wikipedia talk:VP2

message: What's the difference between VandalProof and VandalProof2?-- PNiddy-~ // My edits 14:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: VP2 is coordinated and is more like WP:HUGGLE. ffm 20:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the Difference?
Talk:Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia

message: I know that this type of leukemia is different from chronic myelogenous leukemia, but it used to be called, according to this article, juvenile CML. I'm confused here. Does "conventional" CML ever occur in children? Or is all childhood CML really JMML?
Lady6String 14:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between JMML and CML

message: External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience.  Please read the external links policy (and perhaps the specific rules for medicine-related articles) before adding more external links.  
The following kinds of links are inappropriate:
*  Online discussion groups or chat forums
*  Personal webpages and blogs
*  Multiple links to the same website
*  Fundraising events or groups
*  Websites that are recruiting for clinical trials
*  Websites that are selling things (e.g., books or memberships)
I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Our goals for this article are to:
* verify the information in the treatment section and add on appropriate citations (specifically look for evidence of the claim of having different international protocols) 
* Verify information about prognosis with appropriate citations to support claims
* elaborate more on the genetics that are correlated with JMML 
* verify that the information on signs and symptoms are appropriate and match with the references 
* resolve all the citation needed prompts
J. fong, future UCSF PharmD (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2020 Group 27 proposed edits 

message: — Assignment last updated by H2Oworks (talk) 18:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Reading and Writing in the Natural Sciences
Talk:Fatah Hawks

message: check out the last sentence:  "and of an Killing of Yehoshua Weisbrod."
an?  who made that? 49.199.80.55 (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd paragraph needs fixing
File talk:TransAmerica.PNG

message: This map shows Tobago in pink, meaning that it is North American, yet the text represents it as South American. If the map were correct, that would make Trinidad and Tobago a transcontinental country, but it makes more sense for Tobago to be associated with South America, so its color should be changed to green. Heff01 14:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sandwich generation

message: Can anyone tell me if there are good resources/books on this subject? 24.126.71.119 14:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Really!? As a society we couldn’t come up with a more eloquent or dignified metaphor? We had to use various kinds of sandwiches!? This feels like a Seinfeld episode Gatsumi (talk) 19:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandwich, club sandwich and open faced sandwich… 

message: — Assignment last updated by Srh2023 (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2023
Template talk:Java (software platform)

message: I can't see any justification for excluding non-Sun Java links from this box.
Templates are navigational aids, and Wikipedia doesn't mind Blackdown users learning about GNU Classpath, or GNU Classpath users learning about Sun's class libraries.
If Sun's contributions to Java were small, then I could see that maybe that niche topic maybe deserve a box to itself, but they're not.  The majority of Java info is Sun-Java info, so adding non-Sun links will not overly bloat this box and will not thwart the searches of any peculiar folk who find it difficult to uncover Sun-Java info among the general Java info. Gronky 15:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not limited to Sun

message: Java Platform consists of four components illustrated here. Anwar (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Java Platform

message: Why is this icon needed? You don't see Ronald McDonald in the McDonalds templates , PS I didn't mean to edit the template though I was in sandbox Gnevin (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Duke?
Talk:Pecorino sardo

message: See italian wikipedia articles https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecorino_sardo  & https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiore_sardo , also each cheese being tagged DOP  have their own website www.pecorinosardo.it and www.fioresardo.it . These types of cheese cannot be less pungent and biting than pecorino romano from the continent as the sardinian cheese in quesiton can be found in extra strong, "stagionato" form, which is quite dry ,hard and brownish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.82.152.110 (talk) 14:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pecorino Sardo and Fiore Sardo are both D.O.P. and are not legally the same 

message: *Oppose The two articles should and do refer to each other, but they are entirely distinct cheeses: one is made from sheep’s milk (hence ‘Pecorino’) and the other from cows’. —Ian Spackman (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Pecorino Sardo]] and [[Sardo cheese|Sardo]] 

message: The article mentions the use of lamb/kid rennet, but does a specific type of Rennet have to be used in the making of this cheese? I believe calf rennet has to be used in Parmigiano-Reggiano, but can any type rennet be used in Pecorino Sardo? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 09:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rennet

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 November 2023
Talk:Cherry Pie (Warrant song)

message: Is there any source for the assertion that the couplet about baseball is a "direct reference" to a random line from a Woody Allen movie? The idea of thinking about baseball to prolong lovemaking has been mentioned many, many times in pop culture, probably dating back well before Play It Again, Sam. Is there anything anywhere that states Lane was referring to Woody Allen specifically? Because this smells of original research to me.Crazydiamond1to9 (talk) 00:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering that myself. If no one can find a reference I say delete it. Tithonfury (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Woody Allen

message: "During the guitar solo, Brown is seen playing air guitar." -- Seriously, so what and who cares?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.183.173 (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a "cultural reference"? 

message: Is there any source for the assertion that the lyrics were written by Lane on a pizza box or is this an ‘urban legend’?
Is there anything anywhere that proves that this pizza box was on display at the Hard Rock Cafe in Destin, Florida?
NOTE - The Hard Rock Cafe in Destin, Florida, permanently closed in June 2014.
Are there any photographs anywhere that shows the pizza box (that has yet to be proven to exist) on display at the Hard Rock Cafe in Destin, Florida?
There ARE photographs that are easily available online that show that the waitress dress from the ‘Cherry Pie’ music video was on display at the Hard Rock Cafe in Destin, Florida.
Also, there ARE photographs that are easily available online that show that the pizza box used by Nikki Sixx from Motley Crue to write the lyrics to ‘Merry-Go-Round’ upon was on display at the Hard Rock Cafe in Destin, Florida.
Clarification with source(s) or remove. WJPK (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizza Box - Sources?