lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity

message: Willuconquer: Please note that Wikipedia policy on copyright does not include information obtained from Givernment websites. The vatican.va domain beingthe domain of the government of an independant state, it would not therefore be affected by copyright rules. Please note also that all sources and references are duely mentionned. For the benefit of the information of Wikipedia readers, I undo your modifications.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willuconquer (talk • contribs) 11:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your statement concerning the public domain of Vatican writings may have merit. At the moment, however, I am uncertain. I think it will depend on whether these are works of the Holy See rather than the Vatican State. Their website seems to indicate ownership of all copyrights. I'll ask for some clarification of this from the Wikipedia copyright experts. I would suggest you wait with the reversions until the issue can be clarified by WP.  — CactusWriter | needles 13:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Public domain of Vatican writings

message: There is a dominican theologian named Jean-Marie Tillard who appears to have made significant contributions to the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. He might possibly deserve to be mentioned in a Wikipedia article.  ADM (talk) 06:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jean-Marie Tillard
Talk:Xin Xianying

message: Pretty sure the opening statement alone "Xin Xianying's words showed her wisdom and practicality, for which she is famous now. Many times Xin Xianying spoke her mind, even when others couldn't." is worthy of neutrality dispute. - 75.150.195.86 (talk) 13:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Cassidy (author)

message: As mentioned in the article, Cassidy is a co-founder and head of Klutz Press, one of the biggest publishers of children's books, and is the author of over 200 books, including one that has sold over 2.5 million copies.  His contributions have been recognized by many reputable publications and by at least one very prestigious award.  Under the notability standards this seems like more than enough to me.  I have read a lot about him in many independent sources, and am in the process of hunting some more down.  
On a side note, this article was up for exactly 16 minutes before it was flagged.  I was (and am) still working on it.  Give me a little time, please, folks.  
Gzoek 04:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Synagogues in India

message: (Jay A. Waronker, Atlanta GA USA)
How to visit a Indian Jewish (Bene-Israel) Synagogue in Panvel from Mumbai:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beth El Synagogue (aka "Israel lokancha prathnasthan/mandir/masjid")
909 Mahatma Gandhi Rd (Mirchi Galli),
Panvel
Tel: 91 22-745-1014
-Best way to get to the synagogue is to take the Mumbai-Panvel ST bus
from DADAR in Mumbai( the ST bus stands are located on Dr. Ambedkar road near
khodadad circle/Dadar TT, right in front of the defunct Kohinoor Mills)
-Once you get to the ST terminal in Panvel (1-1.5 hour ride), try
hailing a rickshaw to take you to the synagogue. Usually saying  'take
me to "Israel lokancha prathnasthan/mandir/masjid"' works!
-You can request to light an oil lamp in the synagogue-donations are welcome!
It is also traditional to make a wish for whatever you wish for.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesdovi (talk • contribs) 14:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From article page
Talk:Greg! The Stop Sign!!

message: Noticed that after the comment about the solo being based on the Shadows instrumental, someone has put a "citation needed" thing..
Well here's your citation... ACTUALLY LISTEN to the two songs. With your EARS!!! And then try to tell me honestly that (the solo of) one is not based on the other. Seriously, this is the reason the world's going down the pipe, people refuse to accept what is the obvious truth, even if it's right in front of them. Revolution 9 (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, you know, provide a citation.Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Solo
Talk:Dius Vintari

message: There's no mention on screen of how Galen knows of this future. It's even left ambiguous at the end whether he even believed it would happen to begin with. But when JMS was asked online about how Galen knew the future, he mentioned that it's already established (referring to the novels) that technomages have time travel technology. He said he'd leave it at that. So I don't think there's any reason to speculate that Galen saw this in a vision. Parableman 02:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galen's vision?
Talk:Bon MacDougall

message: Seems extremely likely these articles refer to the same person. Merge should be uncontroversial. Pburka (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Cecil Hare

message: Social Security Death Master Index listing
Born in 1919 Canada, to Jessie and Amelia HARE see 1930 census Sheridan OR.
Died 14 April 1963, Coeur d'Alene Idaho.
Cecil was coach of IHM Academy Panthers football team
Cecil is brother of Ray_Hare, who also played Gonzaga_University and Washington Redskin Football with him
Cecil was inducted into Gonzaga University Hall of Fame in 1989
71.210.24.150 04:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: additional information
Template talk:Gene

message: Clicking this:  regenerates: "Unable to open remote file". Whereas manual entering "THRA" into the "quick gene search box" on link title still works.  I can't find any information on the HUGO website on how to link.  So I am not sure if it is a problem with their web site or with this template.  Any ideas? Boghog2 05:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken?

message: I wanted to link to the "carbonic anhydrase I" HUGO gene with  but as you see, it instead retrieves the record for "ABCA1 ".  So the link:
http://www.genenames.org/data/hgnc_data.php?match=CA1
doesn't return what I want, however the following link:
http://www.genenames.org/data/hgnc_data.php?hgnc_id=1368
returns what I want.
Is there any way to modify the gene link to use the "HGNC ID" (as recommended here) instead of the gene name?  For example:
 would link to hgnc_id=1368 but display CA1 in the wiki article.  Or alternatively is there any way to force an exact string match?  I experimented with several things including regular expressions, but nothing seems to work.
Cheers.  Boghog2 23:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exact vs substring matches

message: This addresses both gene templates, gene and gene2.
The URLs from the gene2 templates are dead, e.g. some genes linked on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonic_anhydrase . 
The URLs to Gene symbol reports (when linking via HGNC ID) should all be in the format https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/
However the above URL won't be suitable for the gene template because it uses a symbol search instead. This is less ideal as symbols can change, but also can bring back multiple hits in the search (eg https://www.genenames.org/tools/search/#!/genes?query=CA5B brings back two hits for the CA5B link in the above Carbonic anhydrase page). It looks like generally the intended usage is to link to a specific HGNC symbol report, so using an HGNC ID direct link will have the intended result more often than linking to a search query.
As an aside it's a bit confusing to have both templates in use and duplicates the amount of revisions that need to be made if URLs should change again in future. Any chance of merging to a single template that links via HGNC ID? I suppose the complication is that all current usage instances of the Template:gene would need to be edited as these generally link via symbol search instead of the stable HGNC ID. Thoughts?
Aretaon (talk) 13:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links to HGNC need to be updated.
Talk:Blind pig (disambiguation)

message: Is the record label notable? If not do they belong? Freedomeagle 05:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Any organization with the initials PG can be called the "blind pigs" because PG is "a pig without an i."  Oh, brother.  There was a Confederate militia group during the Civil War that took the name 'Public Guard.'  Local wags called them the Blind Pigs.
That's the only example I know.  Does anybody else know of others?
Terry J. Carter (talk) 03:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blind Pig--entirely different meaning
Talk:Vic Mercredi

message: Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
-No, there were no references provided in the reference list.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
-Yes the article is neutral and did not show any signs of bias toward a particular position.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
-The current information is not out of date but the teams that Vic played for in his junior hockey career should be added, as well as the fact that he was inducted into the Northwest Territories hall of fame.
Hermista (talk) 23:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Fever Tree (band)

message: So, did someone in the band make this page? This page is terrible. Idioasis 05:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australian Catholic Students Association

message: I have added Internal Links to this article.  Kathleen.wright5 13:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Internal Links  
File talk:5uu's 1995.jpg

message: The 5uu's are no longer active and I have updated the group's article and this image page to reflect this fact. This means that new photographs can be taken and until a free image is found, I believe that the fair-use rationale on the image page is still valid. --Bruce1ee 05:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaceable fair use disputed
Talk:Harold (film)

message: The plot summary reads like it has been written by an 8 year old. I've never even heard of this film, so I'm not in a position to do anything about it, but someone really should sort it out. Zestos (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Come on, "his manhood"?!? What is this, a really crappy romance novel?KyleGoetz (talk) 05:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Written by a kid?
Talk:Executive Order 13438

message: Prof. Chossudovsky's website, from the last external link, looks like a hack job.  It should probably be removed. 69.133.143.122 06:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prof. Chossudovsky

message: Is there not a number for this order? 74.68.39.174 (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is listed as Executive Order 13438 according to the NARA EO disposition tables. - Dmeranda (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: EO Number

message: Global research  is a self-published advocacy site, and Chossudovsky is its founder. This is non-notable self promotion, which is not encyclopedic. It has been discussed on RSN before - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_1#globalresearch.ca GoGoTob2 (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources
Talk:Samsung SPH-M620

message: The M620 is the new phone out by Samsung, it's better known as the upstage. I think it deserves a page.  Here's the url of the C|Net review of it : http://reviews.cnet.com/cell-phones/samsung-upstage-sph-m620/4505-6454_7-32378893.html
Loveshams 06:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

message: This article has info about Samsung SPH-M620 but the image in infobox tenplate is Samsung SGH-M620. It is wrong image. Should we remove it? UnknownExplorer41 (talk) 20:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Image
Talk:Travel to the Earth's center

message: I love this encyclopedia. --Kizor 06:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will be expanding when I find the time. There's material on the scientific feasibility of such an endeavour, basic background information on the planet's composition, historical records on deep drilling attempts (we need to cover how far down humans have gone), a lot more to say about works of fiction on the matter, in particular those from the late 19th/early 20th century, when the idea seems to have been in fashion... is there any data or fiction on the travel to the core of other planetary bodies? Mind, "when I find the time" could well be in 2008 -- if you want to add something, go ahead and do it. --Kizor 07:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

message: "No scientist has seriously entertained the idea that travel to the Earth's center might someday become feasible"
Is this not an extremely ludicrous claim? Why was it on the article for so long with neither a source nor a request for citation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.81.0.183 (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???
Talk:God's eye

message: I started this article way back when and I would have thought by now that the article would have a picture of a God's eye to accompany the text. Doesn't every parent of a kindergärtner has one of these things hanging on their refrigerator? If you do, please upload a pic of it. Jason Quinn (talk) 13:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of a God's eye 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles/Archives/2007/7

message: Hello all,
I think this is a very worthy project, so I claimed and finished a block of 10.
Fortunately for me, they were all easy -- either disambiguation pages or else other editors had recently worked on them.
Hope this helps you reach your goal!
--SV Resolution(Talk) 15:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drive-by Helper
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Karen O'Neil Ganci (2nd nomination)

message: Let's see here.  There was a nomination.  It passed as keep for everyone but the nom.  Keeps were based on actually guidelines (namely WP:BIO).  Now, we have a second nom, and three puppet delete "votes", with no real rationale, and an admin goes and deletes the article.  Nothing in the second AFD, addressed the arguments of the first.  No discussion of her reputation as an artist, which has been written about independently, and was established before participation in the show.  The statement she is known for a single event is a flat out falsehood.  In the first AFD, it was argued, she wasn't known sufficiently as an artist (but the nom, didn't explain this).  In the second AFD, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON read the article to see she was an artist.  Not one single person, mentioned this critical fact.  What happened here, is the nom saw this article in the BB category, and nominated it without reading, and the "voters" saw this in the AFD list, and "voted" without reading it.  This is very bad behavior.  I care less about this article, than the fact we have people deleting articles they have not read.  Now, people can make honest argument why this article should be deleted.  But my point is that this article was deleted without anybody doing that.  That's a true failure. 
p.s. The admin, after deleting the article, put a redirect to a disambig page, not the relevant article.  So, we know the admin was in such a rush, they didn't have 2 seconds to test a redirect.   --Rob 06:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Holy well

message: Where did the Wellspring {Confluence (geography) of the Ocean of Consciousness} article go? B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 06:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will take it out.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled]

message: This article must be rewritten with a more international point-of-view, please.--Attilios (talk) 07:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: UK view
Talk:Cathedral of Chihuahua

message: This is a terrible merge. :( You made a strong article weaker. I'm going to split these out again. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These articles are stronger apart then together. I have nothing against improving both articles, but I do not believe the merge is helpful.Benkenobi18 (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Malaysia Open (badminton)

message: de modified to en-table today, and found 2001 + 2002 Mixed champions  --Florentyna 07:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added and corrected some mistakes. MontanNito 10:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Some more mistakes removed in DE --Florentyna 11:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I dunno, you can say i'm narrow minded, but first, a sub page created with main page hold the same information, i haven't see this before in other article. Second, flag use, then use short national code, but i don't want to mention this again, it remind me how messy by copy and paste from other Wikipedia project and sometimes it blindly copy and paste without reviewing just because to complete work faster and eagerness to show off. So, i don't want to care so much on this badminton area in the future and keeping on non-professionalism work anytime. Bye. --Aleenf1 12:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is further information in the separte lists, with the runner-ups and some final scores, but anyway, if you think that is the same data, you can delete what you want. MontanNito 16:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same data 

message: Cancelled, redirected here. Zoglophie (talk) 03:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Malaysia Open
Talk:2005 Chicago White Sox season

message: This page seems to have through out much of it, an un-encyclopedic tone. It uses colloquial phrases and seems a little biased. I think a lot of this needs a major rewording. Any one else think differently? 131.230.146.135 (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I agree. Ponde (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Speaking as a White Sox fan, it is fun to read.  However, I agree with both the tone is often inappropriate for Wiki. Jrgilb (talk) 04:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone Issues
Talk:Casey Anderson

message: I am pretty sure that Casey's date of death is inaccurate. He used to come to my city (Winnipeg) about once a year, and play at The Paddock, a local night spot/restaurant. When my kids were old enough, we went there for supper so that they could hear him. My daughter, who was about two or three, shushed people who were eating at a nearby table so that she could hear Casey better, which made him laugh. That incident became part of our family folklore. My daughter was born in 1978, so this incident would have to have taken place in 1980 or 1981.Wpg kid (talk) 16:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks.  There is newer information at 's website giving a 1989 date death, so I'll correct this article.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:Last substantial transformation

message: Last substantial transformation refers to the concept in Country of origin law which states than an item must be marked as having been manufactured in the place where the last major change to it occurred.
The word 'must' is unfortunately ambiguous since many countries does not require the label "made in ...". Examples of countries that does not require origin labelling for all products are the EU and Japan. Blimp80 07:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Smith & Wollensky

message: It had also been used for the famous 2008 $2.11 million and 2007 $ 650,100 "Power Lunch with Warren Buffett" charity auction on eBay, with Zhao Danyang and Mohnish Pabrai & Guy Spier, respectively. uk.reuters.com,  Warren Buffett lunch sells for record $2.11 mlncnbc.com, Warren Buffett Charity Lunch Auction Ends with High Bid of $2,110,100--Florentino floro (talk) 09:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: power lunch

message: Is this "several steak houses" or "a chain of steak houses"? In guess that boils down to are they commonly owned, (or franchised), or are they entirely separate? DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: chain?

message: removed:   read ing through this material there is no blatant advertising. Errectstapler (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: removed templates

message: Removed:
In May 2009, Hans Aeschbacher, its chef of ten years, announced that he was leaving Smith and Wollensky to run the kitchen at Trader Vic's.
Errectstapler (talk) 02:38, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: someone removed this information
Talk:Human figure/Archive 1

message: Its true different hormones make for different changes. but why that change is necessary also important. function of a difference caused by hormones also important. like estrogen does store fat true, but why?(this is energy reserve for pregnancy) this is also equally important.  202.41.72.100 07:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  true but why? 

message: confine article to shape/figure of human body. as for all other differences go to article sex differences — vinay 14:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  confine in scope 

message: user:Andyjsmith, this article deals with idealised human body shape, it belongs to category aesthetics. Still little of exceptions are also dealt in a section. if all sorts of body shape are to be talked about, you may please develop article Human body shape(which redirects here currently) or edit Human physical appearance. thanks 202.41.72.100 05:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  human figure 

message: Most of this article is unscientific and, not surprisingly, unsupported by evidence. Perhaps what is clear to our eyes doesn't need references, but statements like one I removed claiming females are "fairer" in the sense of paler in skin colour, so that they have a better ability to absorb vitamin D for a fetus is just plain silly. There is no evidence that women are fairer than men any in any given ethnicity. I would support a deletion as my example is only one of many. Bielle 19:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfounded Claims

message: I've "prodded" the article for deletion because it requires massive cleanup but unfortunately some editors are reverting all changes. andy 08:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and if you put afd i will delete afd message in article, let afd be sorted without any discussion. — vinay 09:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: Most of this article is unscientific and, not surprisingly, unsupported by evidence. Perhaps what is clear to our eyes doesn't need references, but statements like one I removed claiming females are "fairer" in the sense of paler in skin colour, so that they have a better ability to absorb vitamin D for a fetus, is just plain silly. There is no evidence that women are fairer than men any in any given ethnicity. I would support a deletion as my example is only one of many. Bielle 19:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfounded Claims
Talk:Silvo Plut

message: I find the nomination difficult to understand. The article does provide meaningful content and history, and the text is coherent. Notability might be a concern, but I believe that it is notable enough. Nikola 08:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about this article certainly not being nonsense and removed the tags. Tikiwont 09:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed speedy
Talk:Royal Alexandra Hospital (Edmonton)

message: The Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) is a large and long serving hospital in the Canadian province of Alberta. Operated by Alberta Health Services and located north of Edmonton's downtown core, the Royal Alexandra serves a diverse community stretching from Downtown Edmonton to western and northern Canada. The total catchment area for the RAH is equivalent to 1/3 of Canada's land mass, stretching north from Downtown Edmonton to enpass both the Northwest Territories and Yukon territory, and stretching as far west as British Columbia's pacific coast.
I believe that the last line should read as: "stretching north from Downtown Edmonton to encompass both the Northwest Territories and Yukon territory," changing the word"enpass" to "encompass". 2001:56A:F6D1:4D00:D9D8:A067:C617:B355 (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percieved error in body of the first paragraph on the page.