lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sainik Schools

message: 1. Central Zone
2. West Zone 
3. North Zone
4. South Zone 
5. East Zone. Kapil Rangi 241 (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Zones of Sainik Schools 

message: Jay hind Sir🇮🇳🇮🇳 Sir mera name Satyam Shukla hai mai NDA karana chahata hiun kya sir aap admission dege please 🙏🙏 2405:204:A21C:20DE:0:0:6EF:38A5 (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NDA
Talk:Fire discipline

message: Its worth pointing out that the methods described in the article are very much the US militarys method for call for fire. The key difference between the US method and armys such as the British Army is that the forward observer, not the gun line or fire cell, specifies the ammunition natures, quantities, spread and fusing as part of the call for fire. In the US Army its the other way around with the forward observer being told what they are getting. If this is a generic article the difference should be articulated, if not the article title should potentially be changed to US Army Call for fire.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.13.50.176 (talk) 10:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This entire article is completely US-centric and should either be re-written in a more general context or renamed to something more accurate e.g. "Fire discipline in the US armed forces" NathanGriffiths (talk) 22:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Call For Fire 

message: Been a long time since I was in the Army, but I recall that the phrase "cease fire" meant something like "shoot the round loaded then stop" and there was a different term, which escapes me, used to immediately stop firing, like if rounds are impacting your position.  Then I may have this confused, so maybe someone with better memory or more recent service, could add this. Wschart (talk) 02:31, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cease fire, etc. 

message: The statement
: The proword "repeat" is never used anywhere on a radio but when communicating that a forward observer wants the previous artillery battery to fire the mission again.
overstates the case quite a bit. It's true that "repeat" isn't used as a request (if you want somebody to repeat something they've already said you use "say again") but it's not uncommonly used in place of "I say again"  to mark repeated information within a message, when confusion with fire control is unlikely.
74.105.181.149 (talk) 05:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Repeat"
Talk:German submarine U-995

message: I've fixed the "improvements" by a one-edit contributor under the edit summary "Bad grammar and partially wrong terms. "Her keel was, she was... who is she - your girlfriend...? Germany has never been recognised as "Nazi Germany"
*1 The template was broken; it’s now fixed
*2 The bad grammar, spelling that was added has been fixed
*3 The personal pronoun has been restored where appropriate; referring to vesels as "she" is normal english usage, so it’s perfectly correct to use it on the English language WP. 
*4 Nazi Germany is the correct link; take a look: and check the flag
*5 U-995 was not “captured�?; there was no heroic last stand: when Germany surrendered unconditionally, she was surrendered with the other 170-odd surviving U-boats
Xyl 54 (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: The official name of German WWII submarines was always unhyphenated. Like U 995 not U-995. Someone should change that for all boats.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.65.79.241 (talk) 12:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: The "passive sonar" sections seem inaccurate or requires clarification. U-995 was removed from Norwegian service in 1965 and returned to Germany in the same year, where works began to restore it to its original WWII state. It does not seem to make sense that a special "Royal Norwegian Navy design" sonar was fitted in the "1970s"... "1950s" or "1960s" maybe?
--MrHRFloyd (talk) 06:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passive sonar
Talk:HNoMS Vale (N53)

message: Whoever decided that a redirect from Virsaitis to here will suffice, didn't bother to check for other ships with the same name. That led to a confusion in the article Sonar, which has been illustrated with the sonar picture of another Latvian ship with the same name, drowned in 1941. I'm not a naval historian and could hardly care less about making articles about ships sunk 75 years ago but someone amongst that kind of people who write articles like this should fix it. There are :ru:Вирсайтис (тральщик) and :lv:Virsaitis (karakuģis) for starters. --Oop (talk) 22:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Talk:St. James' School (Kolkata)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Soumen Kumar Mondul and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 22#Soumen Kumar Mondul until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Soumen Kumar Mondul" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Translations (play)

message: Hello all! I added a thematic section to the main page, I believed Translations merited it, as its a highly important play in Friel's career and additionally important to many fields of study.
Within the thematic section I added the two sections on Politics and Post-Colonialism within Translations.
These two sections sought to demonstrate the impetus of the play's drafting by Friel and both engage critically with important aspects of the play.
Hope its well received!
Keenan.Churchill (talk) 01:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Thematic Page Addition
Talk:St. Columba's School, Delhi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 08:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:St. Francis Convent School

message: I'll put a stub on this one. There's also another school with the same name: St Francis Convent,Ryan_Aldren 07:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is not clear
Talk:St. John's High School, Ranchi

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:St. George's Grammar School (Hyderabad)

message: Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Any name listed with no verifiable citations should be removed. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 12:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of names
Talk:No. 330 Squadron RNoAF

message: There was a brief discussion in January 2023 about whether this squadron should be listed/titled as RAF, RNoAF or both separately. The result was that the articles should be titled RNoAF with redirects from RAF, and that RAF info should be included in the history sections. 
This article was  from the "duplicate" article (No. 330 Squadron RAF) on 23 January. BucketOfSquirrels (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was discussed at WikiProject Military history
Talk:No. 331 Squadron RAF

message: There was a brief discussion in January 2023 about whether this squadron should be listed/titled as RAF, RNoAF or both separately. The result was that the articles should be titled RNoAF with redirects from RAF, and that RAF info should be included in the history sections. BucketOfSquirrels (talk) 23:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was discussed at WikiProject Military history
Talk:St. Joseph's Senior Secondary School, Kanpur

message: Hello Wikipedians,
Citation needs to get added in the media section in the word "school". Here is the citation link to get added as citation in the sentence " According to school census 2010 there were 2500 children in the school including Kindergarten students" Link : https://alchetron.com/St.-Joseph's-Senior-Secondary-School,-Kanpur
Please take out some time to check and consider my suggestion related to addition of citation Prudent CAS (talk) 12:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition Of Citation
Talk:No. 332 Squadron RAF

message: There was a brief discussion in January 2023 about whether this squadron should be listed/titled as RAF, RNoAF or both separately. The result was that the articles should be titled RNoAF with redirects from RAF, and that RAF info should be included in the history sections. BucketOfSquirrels (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was discussed at WikiProject Military history
Talk:Nashville Banner

message: I'm not going to alter the entry because I don't have time at the moment to double-check facts, but I recall that the modern Nashville Banner was called just that from the outset in 1876. There was a Nashville Republican Banner earlier in the 1800s, and possibly more than one title by that name at different times under different owners. In NRB issues from the 1830s, I have seen the rampant-eagle masthead device that continued to appear in the Banner as recently as the 1970s (and was reproduced in miniature on the final front page, 20 Feb. 1998 -- whose lead photo of the Banner staff featured my wife Nicki and our 3-week-old Eloise at front and center, I must note with familial pride). But to my knowledge, the proprietors of the 1876 start-up had no relationship to those of the earlier Banner(s). -- Tom Wood
:The relationship between the Republican Banner and the Nashville Banner is a bit mysterious. By most accounts, the Nashville Banner sprang forth independantly in 1876, but there are a few strange facts which seem to indicate a connection to the earlier Banner:
#The Republican Banner ceased publication in 1875 (merging with the Union And American to form The American) and the Nashville Banner started publication in 1876 (less than a year later).
#In the Nashville Banner Room in the Downtown library there is a framed copy of the Republican Banner.
#The mastheads of the two papers are virtually identical.
:Perhaps this requires a bit more research. Kaldari 01:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I removed the following from Circulation history, as it has no source, and seems speculative.
A bit of gallows humor occasionally heard in the Banner newsroom, as a new obit came in, was: "There goes another reader." Figures from the newspaper's quarterly circulation audits illustrate how true the jibe became through the course of the 1990s, with readership dropping even as Nashville grew dramatically in population.
Paige Matheson (talk) 17:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circulation History
Talk:The Air Force School

message: Victuallers 11:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:No. 310 (Czechoslovak) Squadron RAF

message: Not sure if an "In popular culture" section is appropriate but if so, there is a lego-compatible model of a 310 squadron Hurricane being sold at the moment to kids in Slovakia and I assume the wider region. Obviously this is great because this is something that wasn't talked about for a long time during the communist period.
http://cobi.eu/small-army/world-war-2/hawker-hurricane-mk-i  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.212.36.193 (talk) 16:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  310 squadron lego-style model 

message: why this link lead to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Czechoslovakia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.220.195.232 (talk) 22:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czechoslovak-manned
Talk:ACR Messina

message: I reverted all edits about the possibility for Messina to play Serie A next year because of the match fixing scandal involving Juventus. It is only speculation, and the fixing scandal above includes even Messina among its main protagonists. --Angelo 14:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: Associazioni Calcio Riunite Messina S.r.l. (A.C.R. Messina S.r.l.) (P.IVA 03022780831) is the same as A.C.R. Messina S.s.d. a r.l. or not? Matthew_hk tc 09:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 2017 reestablishment?
Talk:No. 311 (Czechoslovak) Squadron RAF

message: Jefford has official transfer from Manston to Prague as 13 August 1945 and disbanded at Prague on 15 February 1946 on transfer to Czech control. This doesnt agree with the text in the article. MilborneOne (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer to Prague

message: Are there any more details about squadrons apart from 311 becoming split and reorganised as new postwar Czech air divisions in your amazing 2013 source? Buckshot06 (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query to {{u|Motacilla}}
Talk:Polish Fighting Team

message: Would suggest in first line "fought alongside" rather than "fought with".  "Fought with" is an ambiguous statement which could imply the British were the opponents - "Boxer A fought with Boxer B in a World Title fight".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.35.200 (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: , Fixed!--Ace303 (talk) 16:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Patrick Suffo

message: If anyone has changed and made a comeback it is Patrick Suffo, regardless of the negative comments of the last few entries. No one has been perfect in football (ie., Cantona) and still can make a turn around after certain events.If fans can accept that these are regular human beings just like you and me, mistakes will be made. Yes it is true some players have not had any disciplinary problems, however, human character is unique and changes through time. I think we need to stop talking negative and even putting negatvie comments about others that are trying to be better beings. Joga Bonito! -216.15.75.211 14:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Suffo&oldid=282690617
The infobox suggests he's played for Barcelona, on loan. Being the first club in the list, it doesn't say what his parent club was at the time. The main text makes no mention of Barcelona. Odd.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 18:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barcelona 

message: Can someone source an image to add to the page please? Situphobos (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add photo for Suffo 
Talk:Eagle Squadrons

message: "in September 1942, they claimed to have destroyed  73½ German planes while 77 American and 5 British members were killed."
I'm very curious to know how one destroys half an aircraft. "Destroy" is such an absolute: either it was destroyed or it wasn't. 80.176.236.203 13:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  half a plane? 

message: The Mexican Air Force units, which were the "Aztec Eagles", have their own article already existing. The term "Eagle squadrons" is not synonomous with or generic for "foreign nationals flying in another nation's air force", and even if it were, although attached to a US unit, the EAP 201 were part of their own air force, not the USAAF.--Buckboard 10:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: " ... Polish squadrons were formed from already serving military personnel (ie Polish air Force) from an Allied combatent, ..." - Poland had already surrendered by 1940 so was no longer a 'combatant'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.52 (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: revision

message: This article can be referenced using an online work http://books.google.com.au/books?id=gUlTH4LsvIsC&printsec=frontcover
Please help increase the quality of the article--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 23:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing

message: The CWGC has extensively revised its web site and how war graves are searched. Consequently many of the links in the article are unlikely to be valid.WyrdLight (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CWGC Links 

message: In completing the B class checklist for WP:MILHIST it resulted in a C Class rating, which I agree with.  This article has the potential to move higher if the absence of citations could be fixed.  I also added the US TF.  It seems to me that one or more (UK or RAF) TFs should be added as well. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I came across this rather poignant memorial in Maughold cemetery on the Isle of Man
It includes Flt Lt Andrew Mamedoff. If the image or page is of interest then you are welcome to link or copy the image
Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collieman (talk • contribs) 17:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: memorial
Talk:Merseyside Passenger Transport Executive

message: I would like to propose the merging of Merseyside Passenger Transport Executive and Merseytravel articles - these articles relate to the exact same organisation. Also bear in mind, Merseytravel's assets will be transferring to the new Liverpool City Region Combined Authority in 2014 so as well as merging the two articles, they will need to be amended accordingly. Thanks.
Richie wright1980 (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Trichiini

message: :The Trichiini are a subtribe of the beetle family Scarabaeidae. 
Shouldn't that be something like:
:Trichiinae is a subfamily of the beetle family Scarabaeidae. 
That seems to be the classifciation being used in the taxobox and in the discussion.
--Cotinis 14:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I changed it accordingly. IronChris  |  (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Article mentions Cetonii-n-ae as Cetonii-d-ae. Is Cetoniinae discussed of being elevated to family status or is it an error?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.130.92.43 (talk) 11:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification
Talk:East of the Sun and West of the Moon

message: Spirit husband?  The bear was not a spirit.  Rather problematically corporeal, actually.
And what's the evidence of cause-and-effect between this one and Cupid and Psyche? Goldfritha 14:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was also wondering about the connection between this story and the Cupid and Psyche Myth. The stories are almost identical. If the connection really exists (and it sure looks like it does), could some one who knows something about this add a section about it to the article? Quae legit (talk) 23:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to the Cupid and Psyche Story?

message: Somebody should really redo the lead 67.116.126.226 (talk) 06:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: The images on this page are available in much higher resolution elsewhere in wikipedia - here is one: 
I don't know how to change them and don't have time to go find them all and organize it, but I will try to list them here if I am able so that someone can update to the higher res if it is appropriate. I don't know why it wouldn't be.
Intelligentguest (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi-Res Images

message: I've organized the previous comments under headings, so it looks more organized (and, for me at least, easier to read). I hope this helps and that no one minds. Quae legit (talk) 23:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Organized comments
Talk:Sopwith Aviation Company

message: TOM Sopwith (as he was known) was involved in America's Cup challenges in his Endeavour series of J-class yachts.
This deserves a mention, both here (or in a TOM Sopwith article), & in the America's Cup article. GilesW 01:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sopwith were contracted well before the war to produce aircraft for the Royal Navy - and very few "Sopwith-made" as opposed to Sopwith designed aircraft ever served with the RFC. This was in fact one of the "causes" of the RAF - the fact that service-specific contracts were capable of disrupting vital supplies and directly impinging on the war effort was not one that was felt to be tolerable in the long run.
This may warrant a well referenced paragraph or two in the article - in the meantime I have rearranged a sentence in the lead. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sopwith and the Royal Navy 
Talk:HMCS Prevost

message: Although of a fair length overall, each section here is quite stubby. Needs expansion, and/or conversion to a more prose-paragraph format. Some wikilinks wouldn't hurt either. Also, the intro should be expanded - when was this unit established, and what significance does it have? Finally, forgive me for not knowing much about the Canadian military or about modern military history, but "HMCS" sounds to me like a ship, not a unit. If so, some details of the ship's class, size, etc should also be included in the introduction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LordAmeth (talk • contribs) 21:34, 14 October 2006
*Thank you for this assessment, which should be of considerable assistance to editors who want to improve this article. In the Canadian Navy, some establishments on land are designated as ships, including the naval reserve units. This is true in some other countries' navies as well, particularly in the Commonwealth. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  Sorry about that - force of habit is sometimes stronger than rigour. --LinuxDude 18:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Avro 504

message: Slightly more were produced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.1.43 (talk) 16:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPAD XIII 

message: Ammended the "Manufacturers" list as it is incomplete in the reference cited. The fact that this arcraft was the first one manufactured at the FMA ("Fabrica Militar de Aviones", "Military Aricraft Factory" in spanish).  is docummented in the wiki-article related to that manufacturer. I've added a link to that wiki-article. If needed, please check relevant references and sources mentoned in it. Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentinian production at FMA

message: According to this RAF chronology, the type flew in September not July 1913. Which date is correct? Drutt (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: September - cite added.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First flight 

message: The replica at Sydney Domestic Airport hasn't been on display for at least 4 months. No response from Qantas where it has been moved to. 2405:6E00:296:A9D3:8895:6AF6:D86:AEAC (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replica at Sydney Domestic Airport 

message: Date cited on the Wikimedia Commons file showing drawings of the Avrushka (Little Avro) U-1/MU-1 is 1923, whereas the article about Sergey Ilyushin implies an earlier date for the Russian copy (c. 1919-20). Which date should be used here? (Mindful not to fall into SYNTH trap.) Cheers Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avrushka (Little Avro) U-1/MU-1
Talk:Fairchild PT-19

message: The article mentions 98 survivors "today", to which I added a //when?// tag. More specifically, I wonder if a mention should be made of the crash of an ST3KR in August 2009, at Diest EBDT Airfield in Belgium, apparently through poor fuel management. Or is this too accidental? Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivors