lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Limbic system

message: Evolution non sequitur or obsolete/fallacious opinion about evolution:
In section Evolution, number list, item 3:
:Similar development of the neocortex in mammalian species unrelated to humans and primates has also occurred, for example in cetaceans and elephants; thus the designation of "superior mammals" is not an evolutionary one, as it has occurred independently in different species.
(The bold added by me) 
My comment: if it occurs independently in different species, it is definitely an effect of evolution in combination with selective pressure and competition between species. How independent occurrences can disprove evolution is beyond my understanding, unless one perceives evolution as kind of a divine predestination for some elected species to become the "crown" species according to some mystical idea of what is "better" and "worse" by some human standards. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution non sequitur 

message: I've removed this incomprehensible sentence. Perhaps it was meant to say "the components interacting with the limbic system are often ..."? Smyth (talk) 16:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the writer meant to refer to the paralimbic components and it got garbled? Wcmead3 (talk) Wcmead3 (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The interacting components of the limbic system are often incorrectly considered part of the limbic system" 

message: The brain 41.190.245.6 (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 

message: The intro should be completely rewritten. As it stands, it is a taxonomy of the components of the limbic system, and to the reader seeking general information, it is a jumble of meaningless names. Would an article on the United States be introduced by a list of the states? Wcmead3 (talk) Wcmead3 (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction is an inappropriate taxonomy
Talk:Philip II Philoromaeus

message: User Zibblsnrt (125875) on Slashdot has denounced the accuracy of the current version of this article here.  Unfortunately I know nothing about this material myself or I'd attempt to correct it. --Saucepan 21:59, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted to the last edit before the apparent alternative history invention added by anonymous User:194.47.63.12 on 15 July 2003. The rest of this Anon. user's "contributions" had better be checked now by someone more competent than I. I have looked at other edis and this Anon. seems competent. Wetman 22:23, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slashdot user's complaint
Talk:Midnight Cowboy

message: Why does it cite video rental money when videos weren’t around in 1969?Tremello (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  videos rentals?

message: In reference to the note that Mathis recorded one of the only two versions of the theme with lyrics, the article does not explicitly say who wrote them. It attributes Barry as the composer but that implies music only. Did some quick web searches and I find no attribution for lyrics. Is it important enough to be included in the article? (most likely not, but thought I'd ask.) THX1136 (talk) 00:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer of the lyrics for theme song
Talk:Ravensbrück concentration camp

message: Think about it: “Ravensbruck” v “Ravensbrook”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:9C97:5D01:89F:99D7:25B0:A376 (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs an disambiguation anent the English “Ravenbrook” placenames and lastnames  

message: What ever happened to that section? 37.47.204.123 (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable survivors 

message: The information about the number of the Polish women is incorrect.There  was about 90,000 Polish women of the total amount of 132,000. It has been proved - see the book “Golgota kobiet. Relacje więźniarek Ravensbruck” by Zbigniew Stanuch, 2018. 49.190.243.58 (talk) 05:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainly Polish women
Talk:Candy-O

message: Please do not change the article again without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit. --Fantailfan 14:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You have again changed the article without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit again and requesting semi-protection. --Fantailfan 20:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: The cover model section needs to be updated.  The model isn't the same actress from the Lucy Show, this model also appears on REO Speedwagon's "Nine Lives" album from 1979, and she also co-starred in Lunch Wagon in 1981.  She's taller than the actress from the Lucy Show, why are people not seeing this obvious mistaken identity?  Connect the dots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bflowers062181 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Model NOT from the Lucy Show:
Talk:Nanzhao

message: Sirs,
The Thai myth is a persistent one, and has thrown a wrench into SE Asian 
studies for a long time. My writer friend in Chiang Mai says that it 
originated with a writer trying to curry favor with the Thai Royal publishers 
by writing a book saying that the Thai originated in the Chinese plains, 
invented rice cultivation and gave birth to Asian civilization. 
This myth has spread so far that I've read articles about the Shan, a Thai people in 
Burma claiming that they are the old Nanzhao royalty!
Some other points that may be worth adding if you can varify them are that the 
Nanzhao supposedly fell to Genghis Khan on his way to Persia, and that the 
kingdom derived much of its power from control of the Ancient Tea Route, 
something I think I may write an article on in the future.
Regards,
Jeff Crosby (in Kunming)
:I was born in Thailand, and as a child I heard about Genghis Khan driving the Thai people south, etc. and the Thai people originating in SW China.  That being said, I moved to the USA while in elementary school and I can no longer speak or read Thai and that was over 40 years ago.  Perhaps there are some Asian sources with better information on this subject.  --Thomas Chongruk  |  Talk 1:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Thai myth and other stuff... 

message: http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Altera/nanzhao.html has information that goes into more depth that what is in the current article, ie. the origins of the kingdom and lists its rulers. Abstrakt 05:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of the article? 

message: Is Zhao equal to Saopha?--刻意(Kèyì) 17:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Zhao

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=BsyFU9FwCIkC&pg=PA160&dq=Yunnan+Maharaja&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yYLtU4CgIoblsATYrYHQBQ&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Yunnan%20Maharaja&f=false
Page 480
http://books.google.com/books?id=bsyfAAAAMAAJ&q=Yunnan+Maharaja&dq=Yunnan+Maharaja&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I4PtU6nAJoe_sQSr_oDwAw&ved=0CCYQ6wEwATgK
http://books.google.com/books?id=7xeqhnYtrKcC&pg=PA330&dq=Yunnan+Maharaja&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I4PtU6nAJoe_sQSr_oDwAw&ved=0CCAQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=Yunnan%20Maharaja&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 03:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maharajah Title 
Talk:Sipuncula

message: Added photo, removed tag.--Abbott75 08:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: According to the Annelid article, Sipuncula are a subdivision of that phylum. Is there any reason why we treat them as an independent one in this article? Complainer (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. Perhaps I should be bold and change the taxonomy template. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Phylum status

message: It may not be up to this particular article to explain the earlier uses of the same name by Lhuyd and others, but it should at least explain why it lists the first use as 1767 while providing a source dated to 1766. — LlywelynII 01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Good article"
Talk:David Poole

message: Is this the same David Poole referred to in William Vander Zalm and British Columbia Social Credit Party?  If so, this article should probably refer to Poole's connections to the Socreds; if not, we need disambiguation.
Karl Naylor 15:00, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I seriously doubt that "the second most powerful man in Vancouver" took bit parts in movies like Bikini Carwash II.  This must be a different David Poole. Kainaw 14:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Majordomo (domestic staff)

message: I wonder if the definition given here is a little too narrow.  The only reason I mention this is that the character of Zazu in The Lion King is referred to as Mufasa's majordomo (in the movie itself, and in that movie's article).  Since that "household" doesn't live in an actual house (and doesn't spend much time in the cave), it would seem that either 1) the duties of a majordomo are more diverse than what this article indicates, or 2) the term is used incorrectly in The Lion King. - Ugliness Man 21:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Zazu?
Talk:James Howell

message: Page has been subject to some abuse, please monitor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Llanelli P (talk • contribs) 11:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should in this article not mention be made of his wonderful sentence in the Familiar Letters: "Some hold translations not unlike to be The wrong side of a turkish tapestry." ?--Terminallyuncool2 (talk) 08:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations
Talk:Autologous

message: There may be a way to combine the two uses but I can't see a good way to do it other that what I have presented. - Texture 16:07, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Russell Terrier

message: Article has so many problems I did not add link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Russel_Terrier, which is a wholly different article. --Ph7five (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: The "Russell Terrier"  is NOT a subtype of any dog. It has been recognized as a breed in July 2012 by the American Kennel Club. 
*Here, the oficial breed AKC standard: http://www.akc.org/breeds/russell_terrier/breed_standard.cfm
*Here, some news about: http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/06/29/russell-terrier-joins-the-list-of-akc-registered-breeds/ http://www.akc.org/press_center/article.cfm?article_id=4684
*Made its debut at the 137th Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/sports/russell-terriers-finally-get-their-turn-in-westminster-spotlight.html?_r=0
http://www.westminsterkennelclub.org/breedresults.php?year=2013&breed=russell
Regards —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 06:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Russell terrier has its own breed standard. No need to merge
Talk:Australian Jack Russell Terrier

message: There eventually ought to be a separate article for each of the (fairly new) distinguishing varieties of these dogs. At the moment, however, the JRT article discusses all of them and their differences, so a redirect seems appropriate. Elf 17:07, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I removed the self-links in that article - they can go back as the separate articles are written -- sannse (talk) 17:14, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 12

message: Hi - Who exactly can vote on this page?  Can anyone, or is it only existing Sysops?  I've had opinions about some of the candidates before, but I was unsure of if I was eligible to support or oppose nominations?  Can this information be posted on the article page? -- DropDeadGorgias 18:19, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone can vote here, although anonymous users or users with near-zero contribution history (less than 10 edits, say) might well have votes removed as they would be presumed by many to be either sock puppets or trolls.  I'll post this on your talk page too.  Anyone have an idea for how to word this to be placed on the meta page itself? Jwrosenzweig 18:22, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info.  I was definitely confused at first (mostly cause all of the votes were from SysOps, as far as I could tell).  This information would be useful on the main page. - DropDeadGorgias 19:33, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Any information on less than ideal conduct in disagreements would be particularly welcome - it's the first thing I look for when trying to decide whether I think somoene should be an admin. Next is how they handle being wrong - how or if they accept it. Jamesday 05:34, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who can vote?
Talk:Tetricus I

message: The antoninianii of Tetricus were the most frequently imitated prototypes for barbarous radiates This entry is otherwise so good, that these terms (though they are explained if you click on the Wikilinks) need brief expository appositives, like mini-definitions, to explain the sentence to numismatic dunces, like me. Wetman 19:39, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Working Title Films

message: "...in 2005, made its first feature film set outside the UK, The Interpreter."
What about Bean? -- jeffthejiff 07:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside the UK 

message: Has any one got an idea why working title, are called what they are? Was it a 'working title' that some how stuck, or is there more of a back storry to it? I would love to hear more! --Amckern 11:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Is Rowan Atkinson a share holder? I dont know if this is a rumour or not.HappyWanderer (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Share Holders

message: How can they be the owners of the company if the company is a subsidiary of Universal Studios?--Allthestrongbowintheworld (talk) 10:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   Eric Fellner and Bevan are now the co-owners of the company
Talk:Safer sex

message: This article discusses the use of condoms as a harm reduction approach to sexual transmission of AIDS
Safer sex guidelines are controversial because some groups oppose the use of condoms and other groups oppose the concept of harm reduction. Sci guy 15:53, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is something you can easily do at the Safe sex article. Ø 22:01, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Ø.  See Talk:Safe sex. -SocratesJedi | Talk 23:38, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried this approach but was edited into obscurity. There is a need for a safer sex artivcle that can be linked from articles about HIV/AIDS Sci guy 16:04, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Forking articles to resolve conflicts is a bad idea; NPOV should be the guiding principle. I've merged your contributions into safe sex. Please perservere with your edits there, and use the talk page if you have problems. Note that linking to safer sex will redirect to the safe sex article, in any case. -- 80.168.226.10 14:07, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:List of Quebec general elections

message: It would be nice to see the participation rate throughout history.  Tonight is election night, and I heard it was a historical low (56%).  Would like to see how true that is, if someone can dig that up. 
Also, it may be more relevant to place the ADQ next to the PQ, instead of after the Union nationale (i.e. revert the order Conservative-UN-ADQ to ADQ-UN-Cons.  Just seems that most people will want to compare the most recent elections, and the UN and Conservatives are long gone political parties.  69.157.157.127 (talk) 04:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Participation rate

message: Results are from DGEQ where possible, but they don't have old historical data.
Also using results from "External sites" section, but beware, these can have errors!  So check multiple sources.
- P.T. Aufrette 23:13, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  older entries 

message: What do people think of re-formatting this page so that it more along the lines of List of Newfoundland and Labrador general elections? Tompw (talk) 00:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of layout? 

message: Beh, the table code is ugly. Granted it only needs updates once in a while, but isn't a wikified table preferable? Arasaka (talk) 14:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikified table? 

message: The 1867-1935 should appear before the 1935-present table. Really. Donutcity (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: switch tables
Talk:List of deaths by accidental drug overdose

message: It would be good to also list what drug was taken, and cause of death. --Pfafrich 12:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: what drug

message: This page needs to be organized or sorted in some manner. Kidvicious 00:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup

message: I am going to take out Dana Plato, since her death was ruled a suicide, and since this entry conflicts with the main Dana Plato entry.  --DavidShankBone 14:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dana Plato

message: What a weird article. Why not leave out the "accidental"? How can you for certain know these were accidental and not suicides? 81.244.151.129 19:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title/purpose 

message: I just removed Hugh O'Connor from the list, who died of a self-inflicted gunshot to the head, which wouldn't be a big deal if the article had been recently changed, but this incorrect information has been on the page since February 25, 2006.  It's inexcusable that such a blatantly obvious error would remain on this page for almost two years and calls into question the accuracy of the rest of the page.  68.45.106.216 (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article really needs to be cleaned up 

message: I thought that the imprecation to "help expand this list" was a bit macabre, so I removed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.59.253 (talk) 04:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Help Expand...

message: I redirected this page to a similar but more comprehensive page. Of all the deaths listed here, only Sonny Liston, Christopher Pettiet, Edgar Allan Poe and Elvis Presley were not on the target page. I've added Pettiet, but don't believe the others should be counted as drug-related. 82.1.53.159 (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Starsky & Hutch

message: OK, so in the music video for Barenaked Ladies' One Week, there's a "Gran Torino" with a Starsky & Hutch paint job. The article says "Torino," but was it a "Gran Torino" as the music video wou have us believe? --Jnelson09 22:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torino or Gran Torino? 

message: The show's theme song was recorded by the James Taylor Quartet.
Although the James Taylor Quartet recorded a version of the theme song, it is highly unlikely that it is the one we hear in the series. As stated in the corresponding Wikipedia article James Taylor Quartet released their first single in 1985, 10 years after the pilot was broadcast. I cannot provide the actual composer, though.
Tom Scott wrote the version heard on the James Taylor Quartet recording,the version heard in the last series can be found on one of Tom Scott's cd.If you want a to hear a version closer to the Tom Scott theme music in earlier episodes,listen to the version recorded by the Ventures,in 1977,released as a United Artist single with "Charlie's Angels" on the B side.
The theme used in "Savage Sunday" the US pilot,was written by Lalo Schifrin
which is basically a rewrite of "Magnum Force",theme and variations.
Mark Snow,wrote and released a similar version of his S&H theme on an LP,from Weekend,records around 1978,it was almost identical to the one used during the third season,as shown on BBC ONE in the UK,which is not the same as the DVD running order,released by Columbia/Sony in the UK. 
{Eloidle 01:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme song

message: It says, that the article required cleanup. Now, I'm not sure about this, but I'd suggest to delete the five over-long summaries and replace them with short summaries, but write one for every episode. I'd just like to know: Who thinks this is a good idea? Jonathan Gr 12:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Once they're all into tables, they'll be taking up quite a lot of room.
Split them into a new article "Starsky and Hutch Episodes" or suchlike?
It would give space to expand with episode summaries, at the very least.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.151.205.155 (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Episode Lists 

message: I think the claim that most of the Season One scripts were 'actually existing scripts that were merely adapted to fit the series' needs a citation needed query. The only episodes I can find that are described as recycled scripts are "Survival" and "The Game" and neither of them are from Season One. Nelson crane (talk) 10:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recycled Scripts?
Talk:Durham University

message: Is there any reason why this section is inordinately long compared to, say, Cambridge? Propose it is heavily trimmed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.175.213 (talk) 03:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The section in the Cambridge article is missing a lot of information – there's virtually nothing about national rankings, for example – and would need to be expanded to bring it up to Good Article standard. Robminchin (talk) 07:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection -- reputation and rankings section 

message: '2 Fellows of the Royal Society of Arts.' So what? Fellowship of the RSA is no kind of academic qualification at all – it admits you to a rather good place for lunch in Central London. As it happens, I'm a Life Fellow of the RSA, but I wouldn't dream of sticking 'FRSA' after my name – that kind of thing is just for people who like post-nominals. Kranf (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FRSA 

message: Is it worth mentioning that the academic year ran along ecclesiastical lines in the past, with terms beginning on a Thursday morning, and ending at lunchtime on a Wednesday? Collections also started on the Thursday of Epiphany Term. Freshers' Week would effectively begin on the Sunday evening preceding term, with most events running Monday - Wednesday. This was certainly the case as late as the early 1990s. Illuminatusds; talk 10:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Year
Talk:Boston Confucians

message: The Boston Confucian, or New Confucian movement, includes Tu Wei-ming of Harvard (now Peking University) and John Berthrong of Boston University. Dr. Tu gave a statement for a Life magazine anthology back in 1988 called The Meaning of Life. Dr. Tu linked Confucianism with process theology, noting that we are co-creators with God. He proclaimed that we serve Heaven through common sense, the lack of which has nearly brought us to disaster. www.academia.edu/1703755/The_New_Confucians
  Shouldn't this page be more about the Boston Confucians themselves, and less about the portability of ethical systems in general?  The article talks a great deal about whether ethical systems can flourish in different cultures, but tells me almost nothing about the actual Boston Confucians.  --Cholling 21:12, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that. It seems a bit unnecessary to elaborate on it that much. That some kind of Confucianism can be adopted by non-Chinese people is already proved in history. In some Korean dynasties the population was more Confucian than the Chinese. There were Jesuits in China who essentially believed in a blend of Confucianism and Catholicism. Giuseppe Castiglione maybe being one of the furthest on that path.--T. Anthony 10:41, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarify