lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ingibiorg Finnsdottir

message: This should be using name Ingeborg, because it will surely be confusing if all these medieval women bearing essentially the same name have each their own spellings. Marrtel 23:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one "Scottish language" in those days, Marrtel. Scots language was a product of the later middle ages. Anyways, anything wrong with the form Ingibjörg Finnsdóttir? Usually, my opinion is that if there is no standard English form, the original form is what we should fall back on. The article calls this the Old Norse form. As most Norse names are word compounds, there should be a standardized Old Norse form. Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 11:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Can you cite an English language source which calls her Ingeborg Finnsdottir (if that is, as I'm guessing, your preferred full title)? Haukur 10:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: It's not a big deal but we should go by how recent, reliable English language sources  spell the full name of this particular woman. Here are some Google Books links I've found (you need to be signed in with a Google account to view them)    but Angus is clearly the man to ask here. Big kudos to him for writing a professional article! Haukur 11:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did we lose the possibility that Ingeborg who married Malcolm could have been Thorfinn's daughter, not widow? Marrtel 12:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided on closer reading that Duncan was too dismissive of the idea to include it. I can add it back in the footnotes if you like. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 12:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  mother/daughter 

message: Where did we lose the possibility of a further marriage of Ingeborg, whoever she was? And the possibility of her and Malcolm divorcing? Marrtel 12:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because I misread (or rather, I failed to note a printer's error) in The Kingship of the Scots. Although it refers in the text to her death being "c. 1085" based on the obits contained in the LVED, a later sentence, and a footnote, make it clear that that's an transposition error and should read "c. 1058". Also, Hollander's translation of the Saga of the Sons of Harald, chapter 17, which says she was an ancestress of Erling Skakke, doesn't match other versions which have Orm's wife as her sister Sigrid. See Talk:Finn Arnesson. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 12:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  divorce, third marriage
Talk:Adansonia digitata

message: 24.50.151.151 (talk) 01:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "--a tree that changed its leaf and bark pattern as it matured." 

message: Why did de Brazza and his companions Dolisie, Chavannes and Ballay engrave "EB 1887" when they made a stop in 1877?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panscient (talk • contribs) 16:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  de Brazza's engraving 

message: — Assignment last updated by Margaretm9 (talk) 17:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plant Behavior 2022
Talk:Oxford Circus

message: Shellys has now closed and Debenhams and John Lewis are on Oxford Street not Oxford Circus in fact Debenhams is nearer the Bond Street tube station then the Oxford Circus one so have moved them from the list Penrithguy (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shops

message: Why "Oxford circle", is it near the University of Oxford? -- AstroU (talk) 22:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oxford Street was originally Oxford Road; the road taken to go to Oxford. The Circus takes its name from the Street.--DavidCane (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name(?)
Talk:Fast food advertising

message: Overall, this article presented the facts and outlined the subject. It had good examples and gave sources to back it up with a good amount listed in the references section. The outline was concise, listing fast food advertising methods, purpose, and criticism, which are all relevant to understanding the topic. Ultimately this article feels basic, and needs more added to it, but I feel like it’s able to stand on its own well anyway. Also, most of the sources and facts listed are a little dated, and some more recent examples will help this article a lot. One to start would be: http://www.psmag.com/health-and-behavior/delicious-childrens-ads  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.206.206 (talk) 01:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Jiangjiao Fan (talk) 21:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Banksia grossa

message: The genus Banksia was named for the naturalist and botanist Sir Joseph Banks (See the article on him). He should be mentioned in this article, but I am uncertain where in the text. Would someone involved with this featured article care to add him? --DThomsen8 (talk) 03:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't that go on the article for the genus? Brutannica (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph Banks and ''Banksia'' 

message: "Around 40% of plants occur on road verges." Not every reader will make the connectuion to increased precipitation run-off at the edges of hard paving.  Shouldn't it be explicitly mentioned?  Or would that be "original research"?--Wetman (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road verges
Talk:Banksia hookeriana

message: This name should be corrected. Article 60.11 of the code of nomenclature specifies that there should be no "i" before the "ana". Nadiatalent (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! As User:Melburnian has pointed out at Talk:Grevillea hookeriana, the "i" is correct. The name is adjectival in form, not possessive. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the species name
Talk:Banksia lemanniana

message: search yields:
Title: Evaluation of Banksia species for response to Phytophthora infection 
Author(s): Tynan KM, Scott ES, Sedgley M
Source: PLANT PATHOLOGY   Volume: 47   Issue: 4   Pages: 446-455   Published: AUG 1998 
Times Cited: 4 
 added.
only this one. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Web of Science
Talk:Care in the Community

message: I removed the text added by User:80.41.251.124 on March 28, 2006. Similar to what is found in WP:SPCP, there exists a reasonable suspicion that the text was copied from elsewhere:
#There was a very large amount of non-wikified text contributed all at once by an anonymous editor,
#There existed a lack of minor edits by that editor following the contribution,
#The writing style seemed too good to be true, and
#There existed give-away phrases that appear out of place (e.g. "further reading" and "These sources provide additional information on Community Care.)".
I cannot prevent anyone from reverting these changes, but I would ask that they cite the sources for the addition per WP:V. -AED 00:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text removed

message: I feel this page should be marked for neutrality issues. There is quite a bit of suspect language here. 
Flymojo 04:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Was the Griffiths report and its recommendations meant to apply to the whole of the UK or just parts of it?  There is a lot of talk about 'Health Board'.  Scotland is the only part of the United Kingdom to have such institutions.
Things like this take away from the apparent authoritiveness of what is being said.  It would be nice to have a few page or section references to the report.
--Publunch (talk) 20:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of Griffiths Report 

message: Please join the discussion in Talk:Community mental health service#Merge suggestion. `'Míkka>t 18:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: too much UK focus.  rather than merging with community mental health, maybe noting this local focus Earlypsychosis (talk) 07:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: In the first paragraph of the Origins of Care in Community section, the last two sentences are tagged as needing citations. The rest of the section goes on to give textual examples of both these points, with full citations. Those original "Citation Needed" tags seem a bit unnecessary to me and clutter up the passage some.
90.197.208.0 (talk) 18:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed? 

message: The lead sections seems to talk a tad much about what came before community care. whilst obviously important for context, some more information on community care itself would be important Farleigheditor (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  lead section
Talk:Banksia leptophylla

message: I can find no reference for the common name "slender-leaved banksia". If an editor can add a common name and reference for it, it would be appreciated by me, at least. In the meantime, I intend to remove it. Gderrin (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name - slender-leaved banksia
Talk:Banksia littoralis

message: Great image! Now we'll just expand the article a bit....cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been keeping it in my pocket.   Cygnis insignis 22:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

text: @Cygnis insignis@Cygnis insignis@Cygnis insignis@Cygnis insignis@Cygnis insignis@Casliber@Cygnis insignis@Casliber@Cygnis insignis–—°′″§ 165.228.33.14 (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Eugene Galekovic

message: I have checked three sites, , , , and all list different days for his birthday.  I have changed it to be in line with the second, ESPN's profile, after an anon added this, which I reverted.  Thoughts or clarifications?  --TeaDrinker 00:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also this http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/Players/G/GA.html, which lists the same date as the ESPN page, and which makes me think that the first one is just a typo, but the Melbourne Victory one is completely different. I'm not sure, might just have to ask the guy himself! Blackmissionary 00:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday

message: Probably it is more general than player specific. Does it make more sense to include a clean sheet records for the goal keeper? Goal scored record should still be included since they may score from penalties or final minute corner occasionally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.223.123 (talk) 02:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Sheet record 
Talk:Banksia paludosa

message: found these. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  - this article has no conclusions and ...I can't make head nor tail of it...Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Reminds me of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants/Archive43#Microsatellites etc Hesperian 04:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this paper notes a zone where paludosa, robur and oblongifolia all occur (and that the latter two are known to hybridise), then analyzes plants of each and announces some markers for each....without making any finding of hybridization...weird...unless I am missing something (???) Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess this is about tools for studying speciation among these Banksia species, not about actually studying it. Not much use for this article. Ucucha 18:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Did you look at this, Cas? It's at , but I don't have access to it. Doesn't look like it has a lot of stuff on this species. Ucucha 18:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, it is a false positive - came up due to mention of Allocasuarina paludosa and Banksia marginata. B. paludosa does not grow in east gippsland. WRT B. marginata there are variable effects and the study concentrates on the flora as a whole. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Web of science search...

message: I see there is a few images of the inflorescence available, but perhaps this could be squeezed into the article.
:Nice! Will see what we can do....Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image available 

message: Usually there's a little infobox at the bottom of the page where I can rate & comment on the article's content. I found this to be a pretty informative article, so, naturally, I wanted to give it a solid 5 stars. Unfortunately, I was unable to find this application on this page, is this due to a technical error? felt_friend 19:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: not sure - I think that feature has been discontinued. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this feature was discontinued some time ago.-RHM22 (talk) 23:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Those interested can see this page for more information.-RHM22 (talk) 23:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  question 
Talk:Banksia pilostylis

message: I can find no reference to the common name "marsh banksia", including in "The Banksia Book", but I do not have access to "The Banksia Atlas". If the name is in that book and another editor has access to it, I would appreciate "marsh banksia" being added back, with a ref. to "The Banksia Atlas" or some other source that has it. Gderrin (talk) 04:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Banksia rosserae

message: Distribution:
*Understand "in the Murchison Region of the Austin District in the Eremean Province". Should Wikipedia have articles on Murchison Region, Austin District and Eremean Province?
*mention elderiana as the other arid zone species
*clean up second paragraph
*rainfall of area - only cyclonic - average?
**Marriott: "... surviving on an average rainfall of only around 8-10 inches or 30-40mm per year. In fact many years pass with little or no rain - when we visited Geoff advised us that that had had only 6mm over the last 12 months!"
Ecology
* three references still needed.
Hesperian 03:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'ckyeah. (Please.) Hesperian 23:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was quick! Thanks. Hesperian 11:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: to do
Talk:Ovid Densusianu

message: The romanian wikipedia  ro: article on ro:Ovid Densusianu is also a stub, there are few romanian articles on him if you google, i tried using google translate but im gettin all crap, eb has okie length article on this dude. --Sartaj beary 00:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ovid Densusianu
Talk:Banksia speciosa

message: :Image:Banksia speciosa (Bauer).jpg uploaded Cygnis insignis 05:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bauer Image 
Talk:Banksia sphaerocarpa

message: On the Main page today, this article says, "Banksia sphaerocarpa, the fox banksia, is a shrub (occasionally a tree) in the family...", which I thought was strange because I thought something was a shrub xor a tree? I came here because I thought the article would explain to me how it can be both but didn't find but one sentence about this which only said, "It is the largest of the varieties, encountered as a large shrub or small tree to 4 m (13 ft) high". It is an odd statement and I think requires more explanation. How do botanists distinguish between a shrub and a tree? It it solely by phenotype? Genetics? Is it a sharp or fuzzy classification? Jason Quinn (talk) 05:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrub vs tree 

message: :File:Banksia sphaerocarpa map.png says "Yes, I know it looks like rubbish. This was a failed attempt at compositing. I will recomposite shortly, but first I want to use this version to discuss some issues arising."
Should we keep using this map? A455bcd9 (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Banksia telmatiaea/archive

message: I've added this to artcile any thoughts etc. Gnangarra 09:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. Matches TBA almost perfectly. Thanks! Hesperian 10:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dist map added 

message: Guys - on the other bio articles, we're now putting Taxonomy section before Description. One advantage is that the Description is then way down past the taxobox and we can put images near it and not jam up the top of the article. Thoughts? cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the discussion of taxonomy in plants tend to be very technical, my gut feeling is that we should not do this. Besides, currently featured plant articles all the description first, and I don't think a different order would pass at FAC. I wouldn't accept it, for one. Circeus 05:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Compare, for example, the straightforward taxonomy section of Common Raven and the tortuous Taxonomy of Banksia integrifolia. Many plant articles that warrant having an actual taxonomy section have ones that would lose the reader immediately if put at the top, which is not necessarily the case for animals, and almost never the case of description sections. Circeus 05:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, no just a thought. I was musing on this as I always have the problem of teh taxobox jutting into the Description bit where i want to stick all the nice piccies. It would also not gell with te other Banksia FAs.cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Taxoboxes shit me too; they are constantly in the way. So it's unanimous. But I agree with Circeus that taxonomy sections are often far from straightforward, so are not a good place to start. Hesperian 11:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't say "agree with C" in the edit summary as it is ambiguous in this case! :) cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Deliberate. You probably wouldn't bother to read what I wrote if I didn't provide a hook! ;-) Hesperian 12:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clever idea

message: OK - I know why most banksia flowers don't go on to fruit as it would be impossible to fit them all on the spike. I've just never seen it referenced anywhere!cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Final to-do before FAC

message: #Description - "A close up showing both flowers and leaves would do great in this section."
#*Gnangarra has asked us to hold off for a couple of weeks so he can get some better photos with his new camera. Hesperian 12:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from [[Talk:Banksia telmatiaea/Comments]]
Talk:Special rights/Archive 3

message: Bhuck, please do not ignore mediation and allow for a consensus prior to making edits in the first paragraph. Thanks. DavidBailey 11:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was not aware that I was ignoring mediation.  I think the current version reflects what was consensus going into mediation, plus the changes that were made in consensus following the beginning of mediation (for example, no one has argued with expanding the article to include EU laws as well as US laws).  Is there some change to the version in effect from 12 June to 16 June with which you disagree?--Bhuck 14:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Your edit from 18:43 on 15 June and Franklin Moore's from 20:46 on 16 June led me to believe that these changes met consensus.  The previous version, which did not sufficiently distinguish between conservative and libertarian usages, is certainly not consensus, either, to judge from Franklin's objections and your withdrawal of your objections.--Bhuck 14:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not concerned about the introduction of Libertarian perspective, it is your other edits that leave me concerned. I will open a new section to discuss them. In the meantime, I think we need to leave the article without the statements that all "gay rights" are "equal rights". This is an area we have debated before. DavidBailey 17:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we can find a phrasing we will agree on.  I do believe that gay rights are equal rights, but if we find a phrasing that ducks the issue, that would be ok, too.  Your suggestion in the section below is a good starting point.--Bhuck 11:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consensus prior to editing first paragraph
Talk:Banksia verticillata

message: There is a note on the timber of this species in a 1920s government manual
A grainy, gothic image of river banksia is also included, my attempt to clean it up on an antique platform was done by flying on instruments, someone with a better setup may be able to extract more: :File:River Banksia in Primer of Forestry Poole 1922.png — cygnis insignis 03:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  wood
Talk:Palatinate (colour)

message: This page urgently needs an  adding. Except, ah - there's the rub - just what colour *is* Palatinate? Everyone seems to have a different opinion. My understanding is that the colour derives from an historical sample of some robes, except they're believed to have faded over time. As a consequence, shades of purple worn in the name of 'palatinate' vary wildly all over Durham. As I understand it, though, the actual colour is a lot lighter than the mid, reddish purple often worn in Durham. DWaterson 00:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose it does not need an infobox color, as they currently look, since making up some color values would certainly be original research. Notinasnaid 08:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a hopeless case. I'm sure that Pantone 266 is what the University uses on its logo and its website - but the palatinate used on hoods is lilac and nothing like 266 at all - it's nearer Pantone 264. Gray's have been using that shade for at least fifty years to my own recollection: has anyone ever seen a hood lined with 266? Kranf (talk) 12:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Posey and Webster Street Tubes

message: For now, I have merged the content of both the Posey Tube and the Webster Street Tube into one article because their histories are so interwined – plus the fact that in every web page and resource I have seen, they are always both mentioned in the same article. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 02:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Posey and Webster Street tubes →  – “Posey Tube” and “Webster Street Tube” are both proper terms. Uncapitalized “tube” is clearly incorrect. Stephan Leeds (talk) 02:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 May 2021
Talk:CSS Manassas

message: This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as start-class based on its  WP:MILHIST assessment. HausTalk 23:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The Clive Cussler article states that The Manassas was found by NUMA. Perhaps if someone can find a reliable reference this article can be expanded to include this information. OlEnglish (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Found by [[National Underwater and Marine Agency]]?

message: The image of Manassas that is used in the article is incorrect. Manassas had two stacks, not one. Hearn (Capture of New Orleans, 1862, p. 68.) emphasizes this point. I would put in a different image, but the only correct one I have seen is subject to copyright restrictions. Perhaps someone else can find (or create) a better picture. PKKloeppel (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect image

message: It is interesting to read the description of this ship vs. the description of the USS Mississippi and George Dewey's wiki entry. The engagement between the Manassas and the Mississippi seems to be somewhat different in tone and different points of view depending on which ship you are reading about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.215.84 (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone