Talk:Hiro Nakamura/Archive 1

message: Has any official site stated how his name is written in Japanese? -Aknorals 08:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, Nakamura is probably writen 中村 which literally translates to "In Village" 74.132.202.176 04:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Hiro" is probably 結城 Siyavash 16:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm guessing "Hiro" is probably his nickname and actual name is "Hiro-(something)". Note how his actor's full first name is "Masayori" but he goes by "Masi" because it's easier for a non-Japanese to speak. Available candidates are many, but the most likely one is "Hiroshi" as this would be the first three syllables of Hiroshima. Thus the kanji would be 広. Thus, his full name in Japanese is 中村 広. --Revth 13:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my japanese class the "Hiro" from Hiroshima was written with that kanji (sorry...don't know how to code it) and "Shima" was its own kanji meaning "island", making it "wide island."  In other words, Hiro Shima, not Hiroshi Ma.160.36.44.211MrGalt
I see speculation here, but has anyone actually found a reliable source for Hiro's name written in Japanese? While the common form of Nakamura may seem likely for his surname (since it is a common Japanese name), it is also entirely possible that the kanji used may be different and so have a completly different meaning; jinmeiyō kanji could even be used, making the name more obscure/intresting. 
Even more telling will be his given name, as there are several charactors with possible on'yomi/kun'yomi readings that could be pronounced Hiro, or combinations that could be pronounced Hi-ro. Just because he was named in memory of the Hiroshima bakuhatsu doesn't necessarily mean that the "Hiro" in Hiroshima is what was actually used. As mentioned above, Hiro might be a shortened nickname form  of his full given name. It's even possible that kana is used instead of kanji, and while hiragana would not be all that significant, it would be very intresting if katakana was used, since it would have been very uncommon to do this at the time being aproximated for his birth. That would definitely shed some light on how heavily influnced his family was (and posssibly he later was) by western culture, and might even be part of the reason why he is being shown as being teased about his name as an adult, and could be a contributing factor to his otaku-fanboy persona.
Possible opportunities to find the name might happen within the show itself, since the writers seem to be playing up the fish-out-of-water cultural differences. Things to look for (in addition to his passport) would be meishi and inkan, which would be common items to carry when traveling far from home for a indeterminate length of stay. Two opportunities to discover the name have already been missed, and both were strange and possibly intentional. It's almost unthinkable that anyone that works in a japanese business office at any level would not be carrying at least a few of their own meishi, and so it was very strange when the police in the New York fast-forward timeline don't find one; it's as common to carry in Japan as a driver's licence is in the US. The other is at the diner; it was odd that Hiro didn't present his meishi when he approached Nathan, as presenting this is as ingrained into japanese socal norm's in this situation as a handshake is in the US. It's hard to say if this is intential or merely an oversight on the part of the writers (Hiro may have given Nathan a meishi on the car ride when he realises his mistake?), but it's almost like Hiro's written name is intentionally being withheld up to this point in the series. 
Hiro's name seems to have an impact both directly on him as well as part of the mythos of the show itself. There are so many possibilities that there is no "safe assumption" and since since it would be very easy to get wrong, I think that someone needs to find a very reliable source for it, but I can't find one right now. -- 70.59.241.153 17:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Near the end of Episode 2, there is a wanted poster behind Ando that seems to have Hiro's name on it.  Perhaps that is the reference you were waiting for?  --GargoyleMT 17:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in japanese 

message: Wait, wait... are we really ready to classify Hiro as a Superhero? --DJ Chair 18:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Point taken. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 20:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: eh... I was the one who went around and added that cat to most of the heroes characters articles since they technicallly are... Unless of course, one or more of them ends up becoming one of the villians.--Ac1983fan(yell at me) 19:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: INcorrect! A superhero is not defined by powers or vice-versa. They are superpowered characters, though there's no longer a category for that. They should all be removed. When one does something truly superheroic, add it there. Claire is the only exception I can think of, and even that's debatable. Read a comic, man! ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 20:27, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Shouldn't it be changed to "Programmer" instead of "Salaryman"? A salaryman could mean many many jobs. However, many sources concur that Hiro's actual occupation is that of a programmer.--64.219.79.63 18:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean his listing on the Heroes (TV series) article. You could take it up with them, though they don't really need to be specific with the limited space they have. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 18:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation 

message: "He drags Ando along and accidentally freezes time to save the girl, finally convincing Ando of his powers (the truck also collides with a table full of vinyl Mazinger Z figures)."
If memory serves, Ando accidentally put the girl in danger by stepping in front of the truck and causing it to swerve at the young girl.  Hiro had every intention of using his power to save her.  I don't see how he accidentally triggered his power.
Also, about the Mazinger Z figures, I think that is more for the trivia section than the character history/spoilers section. --Mr Vain 14:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing that whoever you are. --Mr Vain 18:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alexander Shadwell. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 18:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno, the time freezing looked accidental to me. But I might've been wrong. He squinted his eyes, yes, but it looked to me like this was a reaction to the girl nearly being hit by the bus.--SSJ4 Aragorn 05:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidentally? 

message: Yatta can be translated a few different ways. It's usually translated as "Hurray" "Yippy!" "Yay!" or something along those lines. However, translating it as "I did it!" after accomplishing something is not uncommon. The subtitles for the show give the translation as "I did it!", so that's what I went with. Giving the translation as "Hurray" makes the connection with the in show comic book not work, so I changed it back. I also removed the translation I put in later on, because I didn't think it was necessary to translate the same word repeatedly. EvilCouch 04:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yatta 

message: Does Hiro have a sword? Someone I know claims to have a seen a sword strapped on his back in one episode. If so, does he have swordsmanship ability? Siyavash 16:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...swordsmanship ability?  Er, I don't know what feat that is, but I'm sure he meets the prerequisites as detailed in the player's handbook.  But, in all seriousness, Hiro does in fact wear a katana over his shoulder in the fourth and newest episode, entitled Collisions.  He appears to Peter in the subway exclaiming that he has a very important message to pass along to him from the future.  It's interesting to note, that in his appearance, he is able to freeze time except for himself and Peter, furthermore he speaks with perfect English (zero accent) and sports a well groomed soul-patch (a small triangle of beard right beneath the lower lip.) --DJ Chair 17:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, no, I wasn't thinking about D&D, I was just wondering if we should add Category:Fictional Kendoka to Hiro's article, but I suppose it's too early to tell as of yet. Siyavash 22:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Not entirely accurate. He speaks with an American accent. I'm no linguist, but I'd say it's very hard to find someone that speaks English with no accent at all. EvilCouch 04:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I suppose I was misunderstood here.  I meant that he speaks without a Japanese accent (which seems to dog people who come to America, mostly because the sounds are so different, (take for example, the "r" and "l" sounds.) --DJ Chair 13:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The sword-bearing future Hiro reminded me of Hiro Protagonist from Snow Crash. Anyone else? --SparqMan 05:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Hiro have a sword? 

message: "A Hiro from the future is also shown to have the ability to freeze time relative to himself and other people of his choosing, although it is still uncertain if this restricts him to himself and one other or if his limits allow more."
I don't know if this sentence should be there.  Peter is a power mimic, so he's not frozen because he's in Hiro's vicinity.  He's using Hiro's power, Hiro isn't 'unfreezing' Peter.  Agree, disagree?  Feel free to change it.
That's debatable as Peter's powers are still shakey. He didn't even see Hiro at first, and it seems he needs time to absorb powers, so he would have been frozen for a while. Also, Hiro's powers have probably rapidly evolved, as the future version must be a while away, as he is no longer juvenille, speaks perfect English, and yes does seem to be able to use a katana, just like Mirai Trunks, one of his favorite anime characters.
: It seems on several occasions that Peter does not have to deliberately mimic other characters' abilities, they just happen - he walked in the air without apparently being aware that he was doing so; he developed psychic abilities even though he was unaware that Matt Parkman possessed them; it is unclear whether his healing was deliberate or whether it just happened when Claire approached (I think that it was probably not deliberate, seeing as Claire herself appears to have no control over it).  Therefore, it would be perfectly possible for him to be unaffected by the time freezing even if he hasn't seen Hiro yet.  This would also explain why Hiro chose Peter to come back and speak to - possibly he was the only person Hiro could speak to in this way. Branfish 04:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be more accurate, but it conveys less actual information. Actually, I take that back, it's less accurate. What does "manipulate the space time continuum" mean? Can he create a gravity well? Can he bend space-time to bring objects from light-years away close to earth?  I think sticking with what the three confirmed abilities is better then one entry that can includes a much wider range of things. Stabbey 18:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  But how do you know he can't do those things? In the future, with better understanding of his powers, he may be able to. Since that's the power stated on the programme specifically, it should be 'Space-Time Manipulation' or the ability to "Bend the space/time continuation." as it is it makes out he has three powers, where he only has one. At the beginning he had little control, and could only teleport, by the end of "Six months later" it seemed he didn't need to concentrate for as long at all, whats to say his powers won't progress further as well, when he gets them back.Jacobshaven3 16:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The ability is only specifically named by Hiro himself, and he is heavily influenced by the comic books he has read.  When it comes down to it, there is no "official" source within the Heroes Universe to tell the characters what their powers should be called, so they only know what they have managed to demonstrate so far.  That in mind, it is best to restrict our description to those powers that he has demonstrated so far. Branfish 04:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers and Abilities 

message: Do we really need to inclue theories or speculations in the discriptions? Until it can be proven as fact, it shouldn't be there.  After all, it could be a reference to numerous time travel stories in comics (which the show often references).  There is also a possibility it could be referencing Snow Crash, a book about a man named Hiro who wields a sword from the future. Amibite 04:32, 17 October 2006
:References to Trunks and other pop-culture time travelers have shown up in "his" blog on NBC's website. This section in particular seems appropriate to the DBZ reference that you pulled. 
:I've been dreaming for a moment like this my whole life. I've become Chrono in Chrono Trigger or Trunks in Dragon Ball. I've become the hero in my own RPG. Except that this isn't a game. This is real. There is no saved game or cheat codes. I get no Phoenix Downs. There is no game over. There can't be.
:I'm excited to take this journey as a hero. In reality, I'm scared. But I have to, and will overcome it. I will not be like Trunks or Akira. I won't live in a post-apocalyptic world. I'm going to save the world! I hope I find my Marle and Lucca though. And soon.
:I do agree that putting such references interferes with the flow of the article and didn't need to be where it was, though. EvilCouch 06:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neal Stephenson's choice of name, Hiro Protagonist, was sort of intentional genre parody. I'd wait on that till we hear that one of the writers was being derivative. there's too much other literature and source material for the Hiro/Hero thing otherwise. ThuranX 03:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DBZ Reference 

message: While on the phone with Peter, Ando and Hiro refer to his "sword" as a tsurugi (double-edged straight sword, which is called a jian in Chinese) rather than as a katana (backsword, or single-edged curved sword, which is called a dao in Chinese).  Of course, they haven't seen the sword yet - but which does it look like?  Banazir 03:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Best to go by what he calls it. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 03:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could Tsurugi be a generic word for any kind of sword? According to the article, "'The word is used in the west to refer to a specific type of Japanese straight, double-edged sword' no longer in common use." Siyavash 13:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just call it "a sword" for now, and then get specific when the specifics are known? Primogen 20:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katana or Tsurugi? 

message: Is it just me, or have all the entries in Hiro's blog disappeared?  Anybody checked it lately?WorldsCollide 22:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. They removed them because Hiro went back in time. I hope they return once it's been established that Hiro is back in the present. Siyavash 13:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing is that I don't understand why him going back in time would cause those blog entries to disappear.  I'm pretty sure it means something.  Problem is, we likely won't know for two weeks.WorldsCollide 19:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fiction-wise, he started writing them when the show startered. Six Months Ago, there was/were no "Heroes". Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And yet, that still doesn't explain why the entries disappeared.WorldsCollide 23:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: <sigh> They...are...trying...to...tie-in...with...the...show...by...pretending...Hiro...never...wrote...his...blog. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More specifically, they were erased from history when he went back in time.Toquinha 09:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I said. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 19:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Ah. Well, there's not big mystery to "why". His going back in time erased them. He wasn't here, doing whatever and writing them so...no blogs. Interestingly, Hiro and Ando remember while others have had their memories altered. I guess, in Heroes, only past or long term memories of people can't be altered, but the inanimate or unthinking/non-living and short term memories. And frankly, the way it's included now is probably best. What you seemed to have had in mind would just be speculation, like what I just wrote. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 08:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a matter of perspective. We see Hiro's Blog from Hiro's point of view, which currently is six months in the past. His other enteries weren't deleted, they just haven't been written yet. AWarriorStill 15:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you've got it, Warrior.  Because the blogs are back now.  *sigh*  And I was so sure that Hiro had changed the past and prevented his past self from writing the blogs...WorldsCollide 22:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I find that unlikely.  It's much more likely that someone on the writing staff creates those blog entries, so that they can pepper in foreshadowing of things that the actor wouldn't necessarily be aware of yet.  --Psiphiorg 00:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiro's Blog 

message: Trust me. It's NOkamura, not NAkamura.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennercat (talk • contribs) 17:43, November 18, 2006
:Right. NBC, Tim Kring, Masi Oka, The New York Times, etc. are all wrong. Tell me the earth is flat, it'll be more belieavable. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Nokamura, not Nakamura! 

message: When Hiro time travels to the future again after being with Charlie, he is unable to go back. Since he did not mean to move forward in time, it could be that time/space intervened to stop him connecting with Charlie. It works like this: if Charlie's death caused Hiro to move back in time to prevent this death, the death would not have occured, therefore Hiro would not have to travel back, therefore Charlie could not be saved, etc. As this would form a paradox, perhaps the natural order of things prevented him returning. Bio 21:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bio, I'd like to remind you that Wikipedia is not a forum. While conversing and comuninity/consensual analysis may sometimes be needed, we shouldn't look for oppurnities to spout "theories". While your attempts at explaining the events of the series are nice, it would better if we just waited to be given clear confirmation. This an encyclopedia. We try not to speculate ourselves or add information we cannot verify to articles. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok, I apologize. I will try not to spout theories on this talk page from now on. Is there elsewhere I can talk? Bio 19:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie 

message: "However, the pair are detained further when the same player they cheated earlier (actually a criminal in the employ of Mr. Linderman)" 
~ Is there any evidence for this?  I got the impression he was the money launderer that "Jessica" took the money to to get it "clean" - it would have been very careless of her to have taken it to somebody in the employ of the man she stole it from. Branfish 05:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Niki borrowed money from Linderman. Jessica sold money from a ballgame. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 05:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha.  Even so, is there any direct evidence that the player (by which I assume the article means the bloke in the stetson) works for Linderman? Branfish 06:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I've just rewatched episode 3, and in it Niki clearly tells DL's mother that it was Linderman that DL's crew had robbed.  Now, while we can't be sure that the Stetson guy was the money launderer (as it could have been one of the other players), it seems equally unlikely that Jessica would go to somebody who associates with Linderman's employees, so unless anybody can justify the assertion that the fellow in question worked for him, then it shouldn't be there. Branfish 23:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the guy in the yellow suitcoat was the money launderer, who apparently also runs a table, not the guy in the Stetson. The guy in the Stetson could still work for Linderman – it would be hard to completely avoid contact with agents of someone as powerfull as they've made Linderman. Stetson guy and the money launderer don't need to have a business relationship to be playing cards – and it seems like Stetson guy wanted to get the launderer back for something. anon. 17:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter if he MIGHT work for Linderman, but until we have some evidence that he DID, it shouldn't be in the article. Branfish 02:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Card Shark 

message: I reckon Hiro's interest in Star Trek warrants a mention. I'd add it myself if I were more familiar with the character but Heroes is yet to air in my part of the world. It's quite clear, from just a peek at Hiro's blog, that he's a fan of ST but, for all I know, there might be reference to this in the show. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of the subject could add this information? Much appreciated.--nichst203.164.147.10 19:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interests: Star Trek 

message: Shouldn't we keep the train bit? It seems like a helpful addition. It gives note to Hiro's abilities, so maybe it could be kept, if changed? Bio 19:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late Train 

message: Accordig to Wikipedia, Takezo Kensei is Miyamoto Musashi. Diluvial 14:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't randomly add new data to an old thread. Anyway, all references to this connection were added after the episode aired. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 17:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the talk page guidelines:Don't edit others' comments. The thread requested more information, so I gladly provided it. There was no previous mention of Musashi on the TV Series talk page. The age of the thread was irrelevant as its questions had not been answered.  Therefore, my coment was neither a candidate for editing nor for refactoring.  "Archive--don't delete," and always include a reason.  Diluvial 22:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd second that, I'm not sure why it was moved (originally just deleted, and then a second time after I restored it).  Ace, cut it out.  --Milo H Minderbinder 23:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Cut it out"? I'd llke to think we're all adults here, or that we can at least act like ones. The comment wasn't going to get noticed where it was anyway. Furthermore, to quote Argash, character specific discussions should be conducted on that character talk pages. No offense to Dil, but a mistake was made, and all I did was correct it. Claim I violated TPE if you wish, but you'll only be defending an error, and not something minor like a typo. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the guidelines (plural) were not clear enough: No personal attacks. It even has its own page: WP:NPA --Diluvial 00:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When did I attack anyone? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 00:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from Talk:Heroes (TV series) 

message: In the section for his name, the Kanji for Nakamura was listed as 「中村」. I removed it because unless this was listed somewhere, 'Nakamura' can be written at least 15 different ways, according to my dictionary. WindOwl 14:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Heroes Japanese website, his name, like all other Western names, is written in katakana - ヒロ・ナカムラ (Hiro Nakamura). Seems odd, especially since it is a Japanese name. But as you noted, there are several ways to write a Japanese name. Andrew Eng 20:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The only problem is that as a NAME, it is almost never writen in another form. Not only that, but because NBC themselves have stated that Hiro is named after Hiroshima, the symbol used to write Hiroshima (広) should be considered the proper Kanji. Not only that, but although the symbol is used in a compound noun, it is pronounced Hiro by itself, increasing probability that it is correct. WatashiNoAiken 75.162.56.19 03:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nakamura 

message: In "unexpected" Hiro reuses his powers, however, he uses a different power than from before.  After the bullet is fired, he makes the bullet return into the gun.  However, he did not reverse time.  If he had reversed time, then the cops wouldn't have immediately swooped down on Hope.  This could either be explained that Hiro reversed time only on the gun / Hope, but left the cops in real time.  Or the creators of the show fucked up and didn't realize that their timing of events was wrong.  Any thoughts?
:Someone wrote in the powers section that he altered time in a specific space.  That really doesn't sound plausible to me, but then the whole concept of the show isn't.  So I think it's an interpretation of his powers, although it's really stretching believability.  Either that or he has telekinesis or something. --EXV // + @ 12:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Telekinesis? Bah. Nah, It seems like localized time manipulation, which I don't really see as far fetched really when someone can fly, a girl can repair damage even after her brain has died, et al. All he did, was reverse the bullet specifically. He can already stop time in such a way that he is unaffected, so why not reverse time so that only the bullet is affected? Jacobshaven3 11:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's trickier than that, Jacob, though I think you're on the right track.  If it was just time reversal, why would the bullet refire as soon as time returned?  Instead it misfired.  Also, it's interesting that he caught a bullet in mid-flight.  To the first, one view would be that he stopped then reversed time just for the projectile itself - when it returned to the gun, the explosive had already partially detonated... That still leaves the interesting fact that he reacted faster than a human could react... Twinotter 20:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Power 

message: C'mon folks! Surely this is just speculation? - Ta bu shi da yu 10:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: About the Katana? No, it's not speculation to say that the present-day Hiro is looking for the sword that the future Hiro had. Present day Hiro has said that he is looking for it multiple times. It was even a major part of the "Godsend" episode. dposse 21:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(the one present Hiro is currently looking for)" 

message: At first, i put Katana as a generic term for a Japanese sword. Since then, Nodachi has replaced it as a more specific name for the sword that Hiro is searching for. Is there any evidence that the term "Nodachi" is more correct than "Katana" in this case? If no one objects, i will change it back to Katana since i do not believe that we can get that specific about the type of sword yet. dposse 21:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When they first hear about Future Hiro's sword, Hiro and Ando refer to it as 剣 (tsurugi), which is a generic term for a sword. Later, they start referring to it as a Katana. I don't recall ever hearing 'nodachi'. WindOwl 14:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katana vs Nodachi 

message: Someone changed the trivia that Hiro is one of two characters to be in every episode to three, the other being Mr. Bennet. I don't believe this is true, and if it is, it's not on the other's pages. It also doesn't validate much, it's cool but that's it. Why don't we say that Hiro is the only one to be portrayed by three actors for Young Hiro, Present Hiro, and Future Hiro? None of it really seems to matter.
:Or we could get rid of the trivia section like we're supposed to.  Padillah 01:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearances

message: The first time Hiro jumped to the future in Genesis and Don't Look Back, he had been missing for five weeks, most likely due to the fact that he wasn't there to live through that time because he skipped it. But it doesn't seen to correlate to what's happening now with him jumping five years into the future and meeting himself. Time travel is always confusing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.203.136.254 (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy with power? 

message: http://www.spacecast.com/microsites/spaceys07/viewersChoice/tv_character/
Can this be linked to ASAP? The voting ends this week and he's badly in need of votes for a chance to win.
205.150.14.236 14:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiro/Oka nominated for 2007 Spaceys 

message: I have added a contradict tag to the trivia section. It states
though the Claire Bennet article states
Does Mr. Bennet appear in each episode, portrayed by the same actor, Jack Coleman? According to Coleman's IMDb, he is not credited for appearing in "Nothing to Hide", but I am not sure this is completely accurate. Can anyone confirm that Jack Coleman, as Mr. Bennet, appears or does not appear in "Nothing to Hide"? --WillMak050389 00:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradict tag 

message: Has no one noticed that the "Hiro with a samurai katana" might be inspired by Hiro Protagonist from Snow Crash? -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 19:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether he may or may not be inspired would not be the issue, but whether a citable source could be found from one of the show's writers or creators that states that Hiro is inspired from any source. PureSoldier 19:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: You really think a Japanese guy named Hiro with a sword is unique enought to make this kind of assumption?  You don't read much do you?  PureSoldier has the prevailing point though: it's been said before and it'll be said again, Wikipedia is not about truth, it's about verifiability.  Padillah 12:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiro inspired by (or homage to) Hiro Protagonist in ''SNOW CRASH''? 

message: I know that there is an effort to reduce the character articles, but I'm not sure how far that's gone, but even if they aren't reduced the section on his adventures in the future is overly confusing. Someone who has watched the show should understand what's going on, but someone unfamiliar with it might be confused. Since it is in the future it has many instances of calling characters "future" whoever or "present" whoever. The wording just seems really confusing when I tried to read the section, but I'm not really sure how to clean it up because the section does give an accurate summary of events. There has to be an easier way to refer to the characters though. I guess if there is an effort to cut out a lot of the plot summaries in these articles the point will be moot, but if not are there any suggestions to make it flow better? Phydend 17:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adventures in the Future 

message: I'm sorry, but there says Hiro folded 1000 origami cranes. Have we counted this? I don't think so. He talks about origamis, and then Charlie adds the tradition, there is no proof that he has folded 1000 of'em. I'm saying this because that sentence aims to contradict the fact that Hiro can't stop time for long. I think, that sentence should at least be changed to "it is implied that he has folded 1000 cranes while the time has been stopped.", if not completely removed.
:Exactly what I thought the previous time. Please do remove the mention of a specific number. --Kizor 07:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, in an interview they said that it was way more than 1000 cranes, because 1000 didn't fill up the room enough. Ophois 02:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, he could have folded them in his spare time. Maybe he froze time, walked to the back of the diner, or wherever, and grabbed the box of cranes, and hung them up, then unfroze time. Besides, this was before his power faded. ZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  18:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thousand cranes 

message: I can understand why some of the entries are there.  But, are we really interested that a Battōdō school has the same name?  And even so I have no interest in his appearance on a POSTER in someone's room in a comic book!  I am deleting those two items as uninteresting to the main article.  Padillah 19:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia is getting out of hand 

message: Unless I get some pushback I'm deleting any trivia point that says "Hiro's blog says..."  There's already a Niro's Blog the user can read it if they like.  Or we can create an article for Hiro's Blog and recap there if you like, but I don't think these entries are appropriate for this article in any case.  Padillah 12:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's already a Hiro's Blog 

message: Hiro's sword isn't really a Ontological paradox. Future Hiro would have gotten his sword from Linderman like Current Hiro, not from another Future Hiro. Current Hiro managed to change the timeline, so he's not going to end up giving it to himself. The sword didn't just come into creation; it is just an older version of the same sword. Ophois 02:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiro's Sword 

message: Isn't Hiro the dragon in the legend? Think about it; Hiro convinces Kensei to be a hero (The dragon teaches Kensei how to use a sword). Then, Kensei "died" because Hiro kissed Yaeko (The dragon wanted Yaeko in return, but Kensei ripped out his heart and gave it to the dragon). Chagi (talk) 13:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dragon 

message: A good deal of this page is episode synopsis, and while this information may be of interest, it is not of specific relevence.  Episode summary should be removed--specific wiki pages already exist for individual episodes.  This removal would also eliminate a considerable quantity of maladroit writing.  (The clumsy presentation and general irrelevance suggests that the original poster was an overzealous "Heroes" fan with minimal understanding of "topics") 169.237.69.239 (talk) 22:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant Information 

message: It has been sugested that Hiro does not "freeze" time, he in fact slows time down so much to a point where it seems like time is frozen. In season three, there is apparantely a character with the power of super speed who can move normally when Hiro "freezes" time. I think this should be mentioned somewhere in the article.
:Sounds good but I see two problems. One will go away and that is that the episode hasn't aired yet. Fansites are great but we need more concrete verifiability here in WP. The other may not go away ever; and that's the assumption made that because the person can move superfast they can defeat Hiro's power. The display hopefully leaves no doubt as to what's happening but, again, we have to see the episode to determine what's going on. padillaH (review me)(help me) 15:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiro's Power 

message: Hiro is the one character that has a reasonable expectation of recounting the "Alternate Future" since it wasn't an "alternate" to him, he was there. But why is it removed from the flow of the article? It should be as if the timeline were linear, because for him, it was. padillaH (review me)(help me) 13:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the timeline splintred like this? 

message: The image :Image:Heroes s01 e04.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      Image:Heroes s01e02.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Heroes s01 e04.jpg

message: Why are the subsection headings so flowery in this article? "The Quest for the Blade of Takezo Kensei"? "An Old Friend"? and the worst "Race For the Formula, The Speedster and the New Future"? Where did these come from and why should we keep them? At best they are inconsistent with the other articles. Padillah (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flowery Subsection headings 

message: There is no way to no that he is doing this. For all we know he could stop time, teleport the other person, teleport back, and then start time again. We don't know that he does but we can't say that he doesn't either. Padillah (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiro teleporting without teleporting himself