Talk:Flag of Syria

message: Current lead equals both the Assad government and SIC/SNG. Although I reverted recent changes in this regard (well, rather obvious pro-Assad propaganda), I do not feel the current wording adequately describes situation as of now. The regime controls most of Syrian territory and all major cities (except Idlib and Raqqa), the other government is hardly in control of any territory (in comparison to Kurds, or HTS, which proclaimed its own Syrian Salvation Government). Current consensus was really hard to achieve, so any change to it requires thorough discussion. Your opinion? Pavlor (talk) 06:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: This is NOT the flag of Syria. It is a flag used by a variety of losely organized rebel groups with different agendas. It is not by any means the official flag of the country in any way. It is as much the official flag of Syria as the Estelada blava (in no official usage) is the flag of Catalonia.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: PlanespotterA320 -- Assad still doesn't have full control over all of Syria, so it depends more on international diplomatic recognition than on "who's winning the war"... AnonMoos (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thats not 100 % true. Some governments are rolling back, and recognizing Assad. Also political interests are not facts, Syrian Government is the de facto ruler of Syria. Syrian rebels( Opp. ) are an umbrella recognized by anti Assad Countries, those groups are loosely tight together with different agendas, SDF, Jihadist and Rebels. "Moderate rebels" dont control a single Governorate.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Seems like current consensus is in favor of changing the flag to the government flag in the top-of-the-page infobox. ANY last minute objections?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The end is probably near, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the article should be changed right this minute.  As I've said before, it's more dependent on the diplomatic situation, rather than immediately following from the military details of the moment... AnonMoos (talk) 20:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: exactly,until the diplomatic situation changes,no change to the consensus.Alhanuty (talk) 00:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with AnonMoos and Alhanuty. Premature. BobFromBrockley (talk) 13:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

text: SAA controls most of the country. The rebel flag is not de-facto federal gov. Unless there is a 2020 consensus for putting the rebel flag on equal footing, there is no reason to use an old version. Only ~20 countries have any kind of formal or informal relations with the so-called failed "transitional" government. SAA is recognized as legit gov by far more countries. All other language Wikipedia articles have the state flag at the top, demonstrating a huge consensus already. Would we put the confederate flag on equal footing with the US flag if Wikipedia existed in 1864? Goodness no. Just because a few governments continue to oppose the Syrian government doesn't mean it isn't the Syrian government - in other news, a few governments don't recognize a slew of governments - US, Armenia, Israel, etc, but we don't pull this nonsense in the articles for those flags. Frankly Syrian rebel flag should get a separate article altogether.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

text: As I said just now on your user talk page, removing the rebel flag should not follow immediately and directly from military victories and defeats, but rather from changes in the diplomatic situation (as discussed previously on this page). AnonMoos (talk) 15:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And as I've said before, the diplomatic situation clearly favors use of the SAA flag (since most countries recognize SAA) over the rebel flag. 100% recognition of a government has never been a condition for a flag being in the top of an article page about a country's flag.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

text: I support the maintenence of the current consensus, as I don't see that there has been a dramatic change in the last few months. There are two strong arguments above. First, territorial control. To quote one analyst, "First, of Syria's pre-war population of 23 million, there are 6.6 million refugees outside the country (of whom 3.6 million are in neighbouring Turkey), over a quarter of the population, plus an equal number internally displaced (IDPs) within Syria. Then there are over 5 million people living in the northwest (Idlib and northern Aleppo regions) still outside of Assad's control, under what remains of various rebel groups, mostly under Turkish influence, and this includes over 1.7 million internally displaced from elsewhere in Syria. Then there are another 3 million people, including 700,000 internally displaced, in the northeast, under the control of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)... Therefore, some 14.5 million people - 63 percent of Syria's pre-war population - are outside regime control." From the remaining 37%, we might also subtract the 100,000+ incarcerated opposition members and the 500,000+ war dead on all sides. If in 1864 the Confederacy had not surrendered and the Union only had sovereignty over a third of the population then yes we might have kept two flags on the page. The second argument relates to international recognition, and the previous position that a more than trivial number of states and intergovernmental bodies did not recognise the Damascus government. It was argued above that this is becoming less true, and I wonder if we can look at that carefully and identify how many still do not recognise it. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Such numbers would require a really strong source... and the Confederacy example is inherently flawed (Confederacy never claimed to be an alternate US government). That being said I´m against any change without new consensus which should prevent tiresome edit-warring. I fear nobody here is interested in searching for POV of reliable sources. Is there even any mainstream media organization that talks/writes about opposition government as the government of Syria, or uses opposition flag as the flag of Syria? CNN, BBC or ARD certainly aren´t puppets of the Assad regime, yet their reporting uses "Syrian government" (or syrische Regierurng in case of ARD) to describe the Assad government. Even governments recognizing the opposition government evidently ignore it and its flag on their webpages (eg. US State departement: ; CIA World Fact Book:  etc.). Of course we can pretend there are two governments and two flags of equal importance, but such consensus is no longer supported by reliable sources. Pavlor (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Pavlor -- As was discussed at length on this page in 2018 (now in the archives), in the normal workings of diplomacy, countries don't ordinarily directly "recognize flags".  Rather, they recognize governments, and the flag follows along from the corresponding government. AnonMoos (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: But this article is about the flag of Syria. And either way, a vast majority governments do not recognize the rebels or anyone using the rebel flag as the legit gov of Syria.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

text: * All of those examples support the opposite argument, though: the article should begin with an infobox of the flag of Syria. The Flag of Belarus article starts with the flag of Belarus, and proceeds to show the alternate flag, which was historically used and remains a widely recognizable symbol today due to its popularity among protesters. The Flag of China article only shows the Flag of China in the infobox, while the Flag of Taiwan article is a separate article, so I don't exactly know why you invoked it. The Flag of Gibraltar article also includes a Union Jack because it is official. The Flag of Australia article simply shows official variants used for military purposes, so I'm especially confused as to why you invoked that one. At this point, I honestly think it's just bizarre that we still present this article as if there is no "flag of Syria." We can still have a subsection about the opposition flag, but to have the article's lede have no infobox and to have both the flag of Syria and the flag of the Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army displayed as equal subparagraphs is very misleading. This is a WP:FALSEBALANCE. The above replies, which argue for the status quo because the Syrian Civil War is ongoing and the Syrian government still doesn't control all of its claimed territory, are also very strange to me. By that reasoning, should Syria redirect to an article about the civil war rather than the article about the nation-state because there is no one "Syria"? It's just so odd to me to see so many editors who I would assume are quite experienced on the encyclopedia making arguments that obviously wouldn't be permissible on just about any other article, and for good reason.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 21:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe we should add the nazi flag to the "Flag of germany" article on equal footing as the current flag of germany. after all, surely there are some nazi sympathizers somewhere in the world (who dont even control any land in germany) who think that should be the real flag! 2803:9800:9504:7B33:4B6C:CC1A:D8EF:BD67 (talk) 01:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The rebel flag is not the flag of Syria

message: the content regarding the color description should contain the current flag, not the previous flag, the brightness of the red, white, green, black colors. Masrauf (talk) 05:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  color approximation 

message: Currently there are two colour tables, each preceded by a list of flags for which appropriate. It would be visually simpler for there to be only one table, = the first table + gold, with a sentence “Color approximations for the various flags discussed on this page.” Is there a proper reason not to do this? JDAWiseman (talk) 21:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour tables