lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anoushka Shankar

message: Why does Origin read as her birthplace? I am Indian but was born in California. Where is my origin? Wouldn't that be in my father's loins and mother's uterus? --68.175.38.243 (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: That she is British is sourced and confirmed as well as being obvious from place of birth, but why American, which is neither sourced nor explained. Also why not Indian (since both parents were Indian)? Pincrete (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: British one is sourced, which also confirms the subject is not an Indian national since India prohibits dual citizenship, hence she's only of Indian descent. Also added citations for her American nationality (she's an American voter as well). Lancepark (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Pentachromacy

message: I have reverted the change user:Smack made to the intro of this page - I'm afraid it was quite seriously wrong.  Animals with colour vision do not "divide up the specturm"; the colour seen is a function of the relative levels of activation of the different classes of receptors, and shows continuity from one colour to another. seglea 10:18, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Point taken, but even though I already knew the concept of "chromacy", I found the introduction confusing.  Do you expect people to know what a "pure spectral light" or "spectral light" is?  Also, since you reverted my disambiguation, please find a better page to link to than the mess that is spectrum.  --Smack (talk) 03:58, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that what is there, though technically correct, is not easy to read.  Also I agree that your electromagnetic spectrum is probably better than spectrum - I didn't have time to do more than a quick revert but will get to it as soon as i can. seglea 12:04, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My understanding is that certain species of fish have Pentachromacy. Can anyone confirm?   SChalice  04:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fishies? 

message: Being heterozygous for tritanomaly, unlike protanomaly and deuteranomaly, would not confer an extra color vision. Long and medium are both on the X chromosome, so if someone is heterozygous for both, she can see five primary colors, as half the cones express each allele of each. But short is on the seventh chromosome, so if someone is heterozygous for it, all of his/her short-wave cones express both alleles, and are sensitive to the average of what the two alleles code for. phma (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Tritanomaly
Talk:Ikezukuri

message: I put in the bit about Ikezukuri of shrimp only being banned in Germany because of what Revth said on my talk page on the subject. While I haven't been able to verify that it is permissible to cut apart a living fish according to German laws, I have not found any evidence to the contrary on a cursory browse of German animal protection laws. However, most German cooking websites that mentioned lobster () included a cautionary notice that crustaceans must not be cut apart while they are alive under German law. Strangely I haven't found any reference to that in the law resources I searched either. Maybe some reference to this apparent legal situation should be included in the article, even though I've been unable to verify it so far. -- Cohen the Bavarian 10:20, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm.., I would ask Revth for (his?) source, but I believe he is inactive at the moment; there's an edit on the soba page that I wanted to ask him about.   But I have more problems with the sentence about shrimp feeling pain, but not fish.  That seems dubious to say the least. Dforest 12:56, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:James Fox

message: Added in his role in Downton Abbey as Lord Aysgarth in Christmas 2013 edition shown in Britain and Ireland. http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-reviews/downton-abbey-christmas-special-verdict-2955862  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.149.11 (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: extra role

message: This page says that James' brother Edward was commissioned in the Coldstream Guards, as James was. Edwards's own wiki page says: Fox... completed his National Service in the Loyals having failed to gain a commission in the Coldstream Guards.[5][6][7][8]
''
:One of them needs correcting. Valetude (talk) 09:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother's military service 

message: The 'Personal Life' section of this article reads very oddly.
For one, actors and sons delineation.
And then the including of his children's spouses and their divorces. While these facts, and are doubtless part of his personal life, they don't actually tell us about his personal life (and are readily available from his children's articles).
I'm hesitant to edit it because I don't know if there's precedent, and this is the first I've heard of the chap.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PixelVulpix (talk • contribs) 18:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Personal Life' odd content
Wikipedia talk:WikiProjectCentral

message: What is the point of this page?
I'm not trying to be rude, but I am struggling to see what value this page adds. Manning 10:35, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
:This was going to be a place for helping to organize and advise WikiProjects had the main listing stayed at Wikipedia:WikiProjects as a way to centralize WikiProject activities and to kind of Interface with a m:Wikiproject_group at Meta. Quinobi 19:00, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

message: This is a tentacle of WikiProject_Wikidemia and the Statistics_Department attached to the WikiProject paradigm for analysis purposes. We simply want to determine what's hot and what's not. Quinobi 23:08, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: hotlist
Talk:Possum Lodge

message: In "Duct Tape Forever", it is mentioned that Possum Lake is 145 beer stores from Toronto.  The figure 145 may be off a bit.  Does anyone know the value mentioned?, and place it in the article.
* Someone has removed a fair bit of the article, I'm going to revision and place the rest of the article where it belongs, if no one minds. And I never watched Duct Tape Forever, so I can't include that in the article. Sorry.
Cdnguye192 21:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I rewrote and trimmed this article in an effort to get rid of the "needs revision" tag.  Cleaned up grammar, and deleted descriptions of characters which are simply repeats of information in the Red Green Show article.  Changed stub tag to more specific category.  I never saw the show, but it sounds hilarious.  Hope this helps.  Cmichael 19:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Mamluk dynasty (Delhi)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: The map is grossly incorrect. Nepal was not under Mamluk dynasty ever, neither under Sultanet of Delhi. See History of Nepal for further details.--Eukesh (talk) 07:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map incorrect

message: It is notable that the Mamluk Sultanate in India played an active role in the protection and preservation of Islam as the whole of the middle east was overrun by the Mongols.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.29.197.13 (talk) 03:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in protection of Islam 

message: I'm not an editor so I don't know exactly what to say here, but this definitely needs a warning banner about how it might not have an appropriately encyclopedic tone (and maybe some other warning banners). Talking about Turks being brutish and calling the dynasty the "Slave dynasty" doesn't seem to be handled appropriately. 173.29.22.129 (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs some heavy tone checking  

message: This article is missing a wikilink to Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor, which has important background information directly relevant to this article, as the actions taken by Mohammad of Ghor are foundational to the creation of this dynasty. If it is not immediately obvious where to put it in the text, it could start as a "See also" section entry. --174.17.171.14 (talk) 05:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , put in See Also section. Cheers! Cocobb8 (💬 talk to me! • ✏️ my contributions) 17:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing wikilink
Talk:Friedrich Karl Ludwig, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Beck

message: *Cannot see why this would merit speedy. Rich Farmbrough 11:01, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He is an ancestor to the British Royal Family through his grandson, Christian IX. There is a double line from Christian IX as follows:
   1. Christian IX > Alexandra > George V > George VI >
 Elizabeth II > Prince Charles; and
   2. Christian IX > George I of Greece > Prince Andrew of Greece >
 Philip Mountbatten > Prince Charles. RCNesland (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendants 
Talk:Horror Show (album)

message: I know alot of people state that this album is 100% true power metal, but somehow I also seem to discover alot of typical horror rock sound on various tracks of this album.
Not only are the lyrics of each song derived from a classic horror movie, but also songs like 'Jeckyl & Hyde' seem to echo alot of the music being played by bands such as Shadow Reichenstein, The Other and The Spook (which are all fully horror rock/horror punk).
Does anyone else share my opinion, or like to express his/her opinion about this? 84.27.98.21 (talk) 17:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Horror rock

message: Ghost of Freedom is based off of Mel Gibson's movie, The Patriot.  Here are my sources:
*1)  MetalCrypt review of the album
*2)  Interview with Matt Barlow stating the song was based off the movie, at least the title.
*3)  with Jon Schafter confirming the song was based off the movie.
69.58.248.102 09:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Ghost of Freedom''

message: Article edited according to sources submited. Thanks for the research! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raelxx (talk • contribs) 15:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Ghost of Freedom 

message: Does anyone know who wrote the lyrics and who wrote the music for "Ghost of Freedom"? I couldn't find anywhere where it would get that specific with the credits, they all just credited it to "Schaffer/Barlow", so I just assumed that meant that both the music and the lyrics were written by the two of them, but I don't feel sure enough.
--69.250.39.131 (talk) 00:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics/Music for "Ghost of Freedom"
Talk:Touched by the Crimson King

message: There are more references to The Dark Tower-cycle than you say. So is Love's Tragedy Asunder inspired on Susan, Rolands true love, as stated in the fourth book. In Seize The Day, he clearly sings "The tower knows who you are" and other references. And if I'm correct, Down Where I Am is also about these books, this being the birth of Mordred.
I think that "The Gunslinger" alludes to more than the 5th book in the series. In terms of tone and content I think it's more of an allusion to the end of the 7th book, from the point where Susannah leaves Roland behind and Roland continues to the Tower alone. After all the voice of the Beam/Tower beckoned him in the vernacular of the Calla folken, and they reference the Beams being safe. They also say that "to touch the Rose will not bring release" which I believe is a reference to Roland mediating over the roses on the passing of Susannah from his world.--Grammar Vigilante 14:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Dark Tower
Talk:List of UK sites recognised for their importance in biodiversity conservation

message: This atrticle has been "in use" for two days, with no edits. I'm removing the tag. Andy Mabbett 11:19, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ("in use") 

message: Have tried to make this article's title more succinct, but perhaps further reduction possible; if recognition of biodiversity usually implies conservation efforts, maybe "List of UK sites recognised for their biodiversity"...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Michael Bay

message: There was a long discussion about made up averages of Rotten Tomatoes scores in film articles. Talk:The_Lord_of_the_Rings_(film_series)/Archive_2#Average_row The consensus of that discussion was that film articles shouldn't do made up averages, and as a result made up averages were removed from most film articles. I was surprised to see this article contains a made up average. I recommend removing it from this article too. -- 109.77.193.159 (talk) 16:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average
Talk:Slow movement/Archive 1

message: I was very surprised that this wasn't yet developed in wiki. I hope that we can build a great resource here. --Jseidel 11:48, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: (first comment)

message: I've closed this here, as the discussion has been copied to, is continued on, the correct talk page. Moonraker12 (talk) 02:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - no additional value to keep these articles separated, some are tagged for notability, refrences. Make your own objective research. --huggi - never stop exploring (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

text: for Slow television. That article is already lengthy enough to stand on its own and has 29 references.  It documents a media phenomenon appearing for several years, unrelated to "Slow food".  Bistropha (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Bistropha, thanks for your valuable feedback, could you please change your vote, I removed your article to the unrelated list (these pages will not be included for the merge)! --huggi - never stop exploring (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you, Huggi.  I have no objection to the proposed merger (leaving out "Slow television"), but suggest a careful review of the list in case some of the other topics may deserve distinct articles (perhaps Cittaslow). Bistropha (talk) 04:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Oppose for slow cinema, probably the rest. Bulk discussions like this are not appropriate, you need to consider each on its own merits. Slow cinema has been discussed in detail in reliable sources, some of which are cited in the article. This is a notable standalone topic. If you want to have summaries of the individual articles in a main article with main links then that'd be fine, but a merge will not better serve readers or navigation. Fences&Windows 20:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request 

message: This page which was created in 2005 as a talk page for the title “Slow movement” and for some reason pre-dates both the article (currently at “Slow Movement”) and the redirect (here). 
Earlier this year it also acquired a merge discussion regarding the article page (over there), and was closed off as a discussion fork.
To avoid further confusion I am archiving this entire page. Moonraker12 (talk) 15:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived
Talk:Advanced Space Vision System

message: From the article:
to manipulate any object within or without the Space Shuttle bay
"within or without"? --Abdull 11:50, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Event stream processing

message: *this section has been removed.  Listing of selected companies can be seen as representing bias or endorsing more weight on a few "selected' companies.  It's probably best to continue keeping sections like this out of the article in order to maintain Wikipedia's Neutral point of view Hu12 00:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See response on Talk:Complex Event Processing. I believe the list or something like it should stay. Ronnotel 02:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

text: * copy from Talk:Complex Event Processing. As policy states, Wikipedia is not a repository for lists, directories or Advocacy of commercial products and/or websites. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias, this applies not only to article text, but to companies, products, external links, and any other material as well. Although it may have been helpful in the past, it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of companies, products or external links. Hu12 06:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Products

message: There are various disconnected merger proposals relating to articles in this category. I think it would be better to focus on tidying up the whole category. --RichardVeryard 08:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Event (computing)]]

message: I dont think much would be served by merging ESP and CEP entries. This field is still growing and the entries will probably change over time. - David Luckham  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Topfatcat (talk • contribs) 00:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger opposed 

message: Before adding vendor links to this page, please refer to [Complex Event Processing Talk] page first, as this topic is currently being discussed. Bardcom 00:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vendor Links
Talk:Moonlighting (TV series)

message: There was an episode of that 1980s Chipmunks cartoon called “Dreamlighting” with Alvin Seville as David Alvinson, Brittany Miller as Bratty Hayes, etc. Cbsteffen (talk) 04:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Parody  

message: user:Rcarter555. The high price of DVDs is notable because it comes from an already-existing cite, and it is directly inferred by the title (not just some aside within the article). Yes, it is subject to change, but it's been that way for a decade, and I used an "as of" template to indicate that it can potentially change. Please revert your revert. Michaelmalak (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because it comes from an already existing cite doesn’t make it notable. Rcarter555 (talk) 07:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: From the title of an existing cite. Michaelmalak (talk) 10:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not notable. Rcarter555 (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD price
Talk:1967 Tasmanian fires

message: hi my name is anthony clive wells and during the fires my sister and i were evacuated from school it was the worst thing i ever had seen the sky was just black and the sun was red and all around me i could see the men with nothing more than potatoe sacks beating back the flames  our family got out i know not of our home or our school ,it is embedded into my mind and i can remember the disaster as clear as if it were yesterday we were lucky  too many lost  lives back then, lets hope thatwe have enough rescourses now to avoid such a catastrophe in the future so our children dont face what we did in 7th feb 1967
This has no place in the Wikipedia encyclopedia but it is certainly first hand evidence of what happened. Maybe wikisource? It needs to be verified too - if Anthony Clive Wells is around you can leave a message here. --One Salient Oversight 12:22, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sadly, I had to remove the following

message: Usual practice is to alert the project (in this case Tasmania project) and to at least leave a message for a day or two on the article talk page - I would argue for a revert for a number of reasons - 'a summary of' the same thing' I think is inadequate in the event of the particular events.cheers SatuSuro 10:03, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging?

message: There are two conflicting causes given
One says "Back-burning" the other says "Burning off"
Hazard reduction is not the same as back-burning. They do burn offs to PREVENT fires by burning out the fuel in controlled burn-offs
Back-burning is used to create a fire-break on an existing fire by burning away fuel of the oncoming fire.
They are different things.
This article makes out that they are the same thing.
Montalban (talk) 06:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causes
Talk:Dreadnought (disambiguation)

message: Sorry to change this so soon after you made it. I'm being picky, but I think the use of the word "patterned" is confusing. When using that word about a battleship I would imagine it means the layout of guns. I assume this is not what you meant, as designs differed greatly and it would be wrong to suggest that all subsequent ships followed the same template. Wiki-Ed 12:42, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's quite alright, I simply wanted to clear out some of the clutter that was at the top of the Battleship article --Mmartins 13:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: patterned

message: Dreadnought (disambiguation) and Dreadnaught should be merged or the content of the two should be clearly separated with "See also" links on each page.  Yes? —  AjaxSmack  00:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Not fussed about which. The Land (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Concur 143.250.2.10 (talk) 12:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree Dreadnaught1 (talk) 04:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request

message: Should the article on the Dreadnought hoax be added to this list? The article's url is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadnought_hoax
Bluemonkee (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add article to list
Talk:Jyske Bank

message: Aabenraa is not in Northern Germany, but located in Southern Jutland, Denmark
:Yes, just look at the map. How could this obscure statement remain undetected for more than 1½ years ??? No reference for the second part of the sentence either, and the Aabenraa branch is seems like a completely ordinary branch according to the official webpage   . I've removed that sentence altogether. Btw, Aabenraa is a *Danish* name. The corresponding German name is Apenrade but the town was reunited with Denmark 86 years ago. Valentinian (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography, people!
Talk:Faryadi Sarwar Zardad

message: the external link is broken.. will put in bbc news one -max rspct 13:03, 18 July 2005 (UTC
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 21:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled