Talk:Serie A

message: The record for non-Italian players of the same nationality in one match is held by Internazionale. On January 18 2006, Cruz (one goal), Burdisso, J. Zanetti (captain), Verón, Cambiasso, Kily González and Samuel played as starters to complete 7 Argentine footballers for the team that defeated Treviso 0-1.
Reference: Diario Olé (Spanish)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianocecowski (talk • contribs) 19 January 2006 Forgot to sign! Mariano(t/c) 08:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia: Foreign players of the same nationality for one team in one match 

message: Anyone object? --Nissi Kim 04:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do. What exactly are you asking?  SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  20:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serie_A_scandal_of_2006
Have a problem now?  And I ment joining the two articles. --Nissi Kim 21:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Now you're making sense. You could add  and  to the respective articles if you desire, but I feel that the articles should stay separate because the scandal article contains much more text than the Serie A article.  As an alternative you could link the scandal article from this page, because otherwise people like me wouldn't realise it existed. SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  23:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We can always get rid//edit some of the moot sentences in the scandal article. Yeah, I just realized this article is very weak, someone should fix this up a bit... --Nissi Kim 23:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That Serie Scandal article should stay completely sepperate.  In a few years, this scandal may have no reference to Serie A as a whole and hence should really stay seperate. Niall123 18:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Season 2005-06 has its own article, I do not see why it should go here, not to speak about merging the two articles.--Panairjdde 23:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Seems you are the only one think in this way. I agree you should be bold and "add information" missing, but is the information is there, and a discussion is ongoing, you should not take unilateral steps.--Panairjdde 10:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is it really a unilateral step?  The info isn't there - quite simply, the article is missing something that is of key interest - maybe a header at the top or whatever saying - "for info on the scandal" etc.  I'm not the most experienced wikipedian, so sorry if that was out of order - but from a random user's POV, upon finding the Serie A page, the most important issue at the moment (namely the aforementioned scandal) is nowhere near as obvious on that page as it could/should be, don't you agree?--Gavinio 15:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are interested on news about Serie A, just go to Serie A 2005-06. This is not the first nor the most important "scandal". Furthermore, the trial is just begun, nothing is settled yet.--Panairjdde 15:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "This is not the first nor the most important "scandal"." Hehe, fair enough - speaks volumes about the state of Italian Football at the moment I suppose.  Right, I'll leave it there then.  I still believe that some mention of an important event that is ongoing should be made in a wider article, but I'm quite happy to give up on this here if you think no current event tags or any mention in the text are appropriate.--Gavinio 12:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Scandal Here 

message: I am suggesting the page should mention the Champions League and UEFA Cup spaces available to Serie A teams.  Ignoring the scandal for a moment, I think the first two teams gain automatic entry to the Champions League, while teams 3 and 4 gain qualification to the 3rd qualifying round of Champions League.  Teams 5 and 6 gain automatic entry to the UEFA Cup tournament.  I believe the COPPA ITALIA winner gets a UEFA Cup spot too, however, I don't know what happens to that spot if the CUP winner and the CUP runner-up are already qualified for the Champions League (as is the case in 2006 if the penalties announced July 14 are upheld). What if the CUP winner is placed 5th or 6th? Juveboy 00:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Officially, entries for Champions League are:
*1- Inter
*2- Roma
*3- Chievo
*4- Palermo
And for UEFA Cup:
*5- Parma
*6- Livorno
*7- Empoli (or Milan)
Empoli, by now, can't take part to the competition. On Monday we will know if it will. Second judgment of the scandal (if it won't come over 25 july) can change something. 'til then, this is the situation. --necronudist 11:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Champions League and UEFA Cup

message: Roma is not the only team that reached this record.
Milan did the same on 1989-90 season, as it can be easily verified here: 
Milan won 11 matches in a row as follows:
17a GIORNATA 30 dic 1989 Bari - Milan                    0-1     Van Basten
18a GIORNATA 07 gen 1990 Milan - Cesena                  3-0     Donadoni, Tassotti, Van Basten rig.
19a GIORNATA 14 gen 1990 Lazio - Milan                   1-3     Amarildo (LA), Massaro, Fuser, Colombo (MI)
20a GIORNATA 17 gen 1990 Milan - Atalanta                3-1     Caniggia (AT), Van Basten 3 (MI)
21a GIORNATA 21 gen 1990 Udinese - Milan                 0-2     Van Basten 2
22a GIORNATA 28 gen 1990 Milan - Genoa                   1-0     Massaro
23a GIORNATA 04 feb 1990 Fiorentina - Milan*             2-3     Baggio rig., Kubik (FI), Massaro, Van Basten 2 rig. (MI) *played in Perugia
24a GIORNATA 11 feb 1990 Milan - Napoli                  3-0     Massaro, Maldini, Van Basten
25a GIORNATA 18 feb 1990 Milan - Cremonese               2-1     Massaro, Van Basten (MI)
26a GIORNATA 25 feb 1990 Roma - Milan                    0-4     Tempestilli aut., Van Basten 2, Massaro
27a GIORNATA 04 mar 1990 Milan - Ascoli                  2-1     Stroppa, Tassotti (MI)
Please don't remove the entry.
Peximus 11:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are missing the fact that the 16th match, the 0-0 against Verona which should have been played on 17 december 1989, was actually played on 7 february 1990, between the 23th and 24th matches, thus interrupting the record to 7 straigh victories. See here and here.--Semioli 16:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia: Record for most straight wins 

message: *A.C. Milan: -30 in 2005-06 and -8 in 2006-07, 3rd place: Champions League
*Juventus: Serie B -17
*Lazio: Serie A -19
*Fiorentina: Serie A -11 --necronudist 19:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandal: second round 

message: 2004-05 – vacated 
2005-06 – not assigned 
what's the difference between the two expressions? isn't the status of the champion in both seasons the same? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.154.102.251 (talk) 11:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the 'Inter champions?' section above. HenryFlower 11:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's the difference 

message: Out now! Collaborate! --necronudist 08:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: @ 2001:D08:1207:415:1:0:F5BA:4AE4 (talk) 02:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of foreign Serie A players]]... 

message: I propose for an article on Serie A records to be created and that all the individual and team records contained here are moved there, in a way similar to FIFA World Cup records. Please advise if this is agreeable. --ChaChaFut 17:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the idea.  Will take a lot of work to collect all the information for it though.  The info at the bottom of the Serie A page is a start though. Niall123 19:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

text: That would be nice, currently the article isn't well readable. The comparison is the article about FA Premier League, it has its own page of stats. Asendoh 21:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Serie A records" to have its own page 

message: i've cancelled a small part of the article about the Championship 1945/46 where it was wrote that it was an unofficial championship.
it's completely invented!
the 45/46 champioship is registred as a regular one, and the winner team, Torino, was and is still considered as the regular champion club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samoano~enwiki (talk • contribs) 12:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Samoano, but it's like when you play a rugby match and you don't receive the cap. No player is awared with the cap for that championship, usually. And, however, it wasn't a "normal" championship: there were two distinct championships ("Alta Italia" North Italy and "Centro-Sud" Center-South Italy, the latter with mixed Serie A and SERIE B teams) and then one final group with best four teams of the two championships. --necronudist 12:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 45/46

message: Can someone write a section about co-ownership of a player? As it is something unique in Italian football. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.40.37 (talk) 23:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-Ownership

message: Should have it's own article like the Pichichi Trophy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.112.59.149 (talk • contribs) 16:00, February 2, 2007
:At some point it did, but then it was merged into here. I am neutral on the matter, but I would like to point out that the Pichichi is the actual name of an award that is given to the top scorer, while capocannoniere is just a term used for 'top scorer'. I assume that an award/trophy is also given in Italy to the Serie A leading scorer for the season, although if that's the case I ignore whether the award has a name. --ChaChaFut 03:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capocannoniere

message: Can we can some work done on this section specifically?.... its supposed to be history buyt 75% of it is recentisms about events over the last two seasons. - Deathrocker 14:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, it's very uneven. An option is to delete the paragraphs and link to the 2006 Serie A scandal article alternatively. StuartFreeloader 11:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "History" section

message: I remember the Serie A was called "Mini-World Cup" by some soccer fans in the early 1990s.  During its latest heyday in the late 80s and early 90s the Serie A had almost all of the best soccer players on the planet under the same professional league, and thus you saw virtually everyone playing in the World Cup players in Serie A matches.  Of course nowadays the Premiership and La Liga has left it far behind in terms of commercial values.  Anyone can add to this bit? --JNZ 06:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mini-World Cup?

message: Does Serie A, like some other top leagues, have a minimum number of matches in a season that a player for the winning club must have played to be considered a champion? Or is it enough to have been in the squad? Or does the concept of individual champion not mean anything officially in Serie A? Just curious really, but if it is treated in the official rules, it might be of interest.
OMHalck 17:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually if a players plays almost 1 game (1 minute, 1 second...doesn't matter) he's considered champion. Pretty sick. --necronudist 18:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual honours 

message: Did you notice many players hold numbers like 22,33,44,55...99 ? I'm not just talking about Kaka or Ronaldo but also about other players I've noticed playing in nearly random Italian league matches.
Can anyone explain why is there so much love to these kind of kit numbers? YemeniteCamel 06:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'cause if you can't have 9, you can have 99 (and you're a double number 9). D'you remember Zamorano's 1+8? --necronudist 08:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double-numbered kit numbers in Italian league 

message: :Image:ItaliaLegaCalcio.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ItaliaLegaCalcio.jpg

message: :Image:Lega Calcio.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lega Calcio.png

message: Does anyone have any information on the total value of the current media deals, especially the total for all clubs, and the individual figures for the biggest clubs? Postlebury (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the current media income?

message: How is the name of the league pronounced in English? Is it worth mentioning in the article?Armandtanzarian (talk) 20:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The section at the bottom of the introduction boasted that Juve is "the most successful Italian team", which goes against Wiki NPOV protocol because it is a subjective way of stating the facts. It should be said that Juve has won the most Scudetti as Milan has won more Champion's League titles, which could make them the most successful Italian club by some standards. It does not matter if it is linked to other Wiki articles showing the number of Juve Italian titles. Also, it stated that Juve is the only team to have won all official international titles, but it has not won the FIFA Club World Cup. Only Milan has won this competition. (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2009 (EST)
Italian football host tournament organized by Lega-Calcio. Juve have more scudetti, Italian cup, official national titles and overall titles won than ANOTHER Italian club. It's not POV, is a FACT recognized by FIFA. Also, World Club Cup = former Intercontinental Cup. --Dantetheperuvian (talk) 20:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Brazil is the most successful National team in the world because has won the world title most times. Juventus FC is the most successful Italian club because has won MOST official titles than another team (Scudetti-Italian Cup-UEFA Cup-National titles and Overall titles won), FACT recognized by FIGC, UEFA & FIFA. The international titles are not considered because THIS article is about Serie A and in Serie A Juve is the most winnner club. Juve has won all international titles because has won ALL UEFA club competitions and the World title (Intercontinental Cup). THINK before write. --Dantetheperuvian (talk) 08:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juventus 

message: Is is stupid to say Lega Calcio Serie A is formed in 2010-11 season, it is Lega Calcio Serie A for years. In 2010-11 season just saw Lega Calcio (the league office which held Serie A ans Serie B) split to Lega Serie A (the Serie A league official) and Lega Calcio (which seems held Serie B and Coppa Italia) Matthew_hk tc 01:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lega Calcio Serie A

message: This article doesn't seem to mention three major negative issues: a) corruption in the system. b) the use of doping in the 1990s. c) the problem of racism. We should cover these unsavoury aspects too. Malick78 (talk) 18:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: And the bad side???

message: Before updating the teams, isn't it better to wait for FIGC to officialize the list? Atalanta is still involved in this year's scandal... CapPixel (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011-12 teams 

message: Added a map based on the spain la liga map  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.95.201.18 (talk) 08:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: In the early years of Serie A teams are clasified only after the points.
Until 2004 the Rules for classification were:
 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
When were this rules introduced?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vfb1893 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  calification rules 

message: "A third UEFA Europa League spot is reserved for the winner of the Coppa Italia. If the Coppa Italia champion has already qualified for the major European tournament by placing in the top three of Serie A, the third UEFA Europa League spot goes to the sixth-ranked team in Serie A. If both Coppa Italia finalists finish among the top five teams in Serie A, the sixth-ranked team in Serie A is awarded the UEFA Europa League spot"
It appears the Coppa Italia losing finalist can get the spot but it seems like something is missing here.
Also second sentence should probably be rewritten as this: "If the Coppa Italia champion has already qualified for an European tournament by placing in the top five of Serie A, the third UEFA Europa League spot goes to the sixth-ranked team in Serie A."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.142.254.250 (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that information is outdated. Formerly, the losing finalist could qualify for the Europa League if the winner already qualified for European football, but that is no longer true. I'll rewrite it like you said. Kinetic37 (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europa League third spot

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902181900/http://www.g14.com/G14members/index.asp to http://www.g14.com/G14members/index.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131208125358/http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/eusa/history/season%3D1985/intro.html to http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/eusa/history/season=1985/intro.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Despite wikipedia is not a gallery, the old logo of Serie A serve as identification of the league as it had much different design. Some other football club article also had old logo in it such as Manchester United F.C.. Matthew_hk tc 17:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Clubs. This is not a club. I don't see any at Premier League or La Liga for example. The old logo provides no info at all and is not needed. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It had in Bundesliga. Matthew_hk tc 01:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't think one single old logo is necessary or contributes to the article. What's the point of one old logo? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: old logo

message: Serie A Official website just released a new logo for 2018–19 season. I think Serie A logo in this article should be updated. phenolla 🖋 talk · contribs 03:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018–19 season new logo 

message: In the Nineties the "Seven Sisters" was Juventus, Milan, Inter, Roma, Lazio, Parma, Fiorentina, but now they are Juventus, Milan, Inter, Roma, Lazio, Napoli and Atalanta, not Fiorentina. An italian link here --Conviene (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Seven Sisters 

message: This page needs to be edited to reflect Inter Milan’s recent win of the 2020/21 Serie A league title. They’re not shown as current champions, neither is the 2020/21 title attributed to them in the “Champions Sector”. Andjelkovich (talk) 10:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2021 

message: Is there a list of Serie A seasons somewhere? Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 02:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess List of Italian football champions is kind of what I was looking for. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 02:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Seasons

message: Logo Serie A TIM 2021.svg RealSonny (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That file does not exist on en.wiki. Nehme1499 13:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the right logo! 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: pinging involved editors. Apparently, a discussion was already held at it.wiki, and it seems that it was decided to treat the two teams separately from a statistical point of view. This is reflected in the Italian project's all-time Serie A league table. Nehme1499 21:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Every wiki is independent, let’s speak about en.wiki here please! ;-) --Footy Tea (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Although each wiki is independent, I still think that the ideal is a consistency between the data entered in the different wikis, as far as possible. By the way, in it.wiki Sampdoria and Sampierdarenese have separated pages. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 06:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampdoria and Sampierdarenese 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lairry (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 112 - Freshman Composition