lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WUCS

message: The redirect WPKX has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:WPKX]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:WPLR

message: I'm the one who inserted the comments about their never, or almost never, playing any female artists in the article. This is not vandalism. It is accurate and it matters. The point isn't feminism but the play list of what was once a great station is crippled and shrunken because the focus groups they consult don't seem to realize that there have been so many great women in rock. 75.69.189.42 (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That may or may not be true, but Wikipedia isn't a blog. If you can somehow cite this with a study or a chronological series of setlists... then it'd be a valid point. Right now, it's just your critique. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:WRCH (FM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a small signaling G protein is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the protein. - Dravecky (talk) 01:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: I'm sorry Dravecky but there is now a second user of the letters WRCH in New England, one that possibly might be within the coverage range of WRCH(FM). Worcester Recovery Center and Hospital abreviates its name as WRCH frequently.LostCluster (talk) 23:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Must be a disabmiguation page because of lost trademark to a hospital
Talk:King (playing card)

message: Charles Magne is often portrayed carrying his Imperial Orb. In the Urban Legend link, the Charles card in the first set is clearly the hearts, but in the latter, it looks like clubs. I saw somewhere on a older version of some playing cards related wikipedian article a complete naming of all cards showing Charles as being of clubs, unfortunatelly I lost it. It explained well the controversy, sorry it got lost. 189.5.169.174 23:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I apologize for posting here without an account (I'm just a wikipedia surfer). I was wondering about the King of Hearts being linked to Charlemagne instead of Julius Caesar, who is instead represented by the King of Diamonds. I was taught once that the King of Hearts was Julius Caesar because in the portrait of the King of Hearts, the king is being stabbed in the back by another hand. Julius Caesar's death was supported by his right hand man, Brutus, so it represented him being stabbed in the back by his ally. Please clarify this to me! Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.193.168 (talk) 02:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  King of Hearts and Diamonds 

message: === Proposed merge with King of clubs ===
Not enough content in either to justify an entire article. pbp 20:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[King of spades]] 

message: Not enough content in either to justify an entire article. pbp 20:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[King of clubs]] 

message: In my poker experience, explained in some places like this, "suicide kings" means both the king of hearts and the king of diamonds, although that convention is apparently a minority. Art LaPella (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide kings
Talk:Vampire (Twilight)

message: On her website Stephanie Meyer explaines what happens when Vampires eat human food.....they have to cough it up later. Should we include this in the article? It's at  in the post for April 16 2008. Sorry I can't do it.... I can't really do all the stuff for Wikipedia. I'm a bit of a newbie. Right know I'm basing this post off of other people's. Sorry! Skigal95 (talk) 01:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vampires eating?

message: Happy to see that my article wasn't put up for speedy deletion! :) --PolarWolf (  sign ) 23:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glad 

message: The see also section seems to have been messed up somehow. Whoever put it there should fix it up, or at least try to make the "related topics" go back to where it should be --PolarWolf (  sign ) 16:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's better --PolarWolf (  sign ) 21:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Twilight (series)]] 

message: Since I have added links to this page onto pages that correspond with it, does that mean I am able to get rid of the notice at the bottom? Thank you. --PolarWolf (  grrr... ) 03:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't. These are separate concerns. Please review Wikipedia:Categorization to learn how to add proper categories to articles. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: I don't see the point of this article, as none of the other Twilight pages even link to this one. Either the internal links of other articles should be fixed to lead here, or this page has no purpose at all and should probably be deleted. Maybe the best option would be cutting it down and adding a section to the Twilight series article. Andrea (talk) 06:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.   Vengeance is mine, saith the Prime  •  02:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?
Talk:Grey Abbey, Down

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 20:07, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Physical access

message: Physical access is a very important concept in IT security. I request that it go through the full AfD process if you wish to delete it. Captain Zyrain 00:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute prod
Talk:Ballinalacken Castle

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—86.45.41.27 (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what the "North fine West 09 18 50" in the heading means, but the coordinates in the article appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to give a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 13:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error  North fine West 09 18 50
Talk:Doonagore Castle

message: Hate to contradict SeoR on this, but it seems to be a case of "I know this to be true". According to published sources (see the Burren article) there is no generally accepted, universal definition of where the Burren ends and where it starts. If this were, say, Poulnabrone, "definitely located" might make sense, but the hills above Doolin are certainly not such a clear-cut case. Just sayin'...Drow69 (talk) 13:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends very much on what definition you use. But based on own research and observation, I would consider Doolin, Doolin Harbour and Fisherstreet on the very edge of The Burren and the castle outside it. The Banner talk 14:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback, and in that case I will try to find a more subtle wording, while doing more checking.  In the geological sense, that whole area is definitely "inside" but somehow, yes, the sector around Doolin has an historical ambiguity, though I think the population centre and the cave would be broadly considered "in" these days.  As we see, we have three perspectives among three - inclusive, village-inclusive, and less sure.  And we are trying to be encyclopedic, so I will also do some more reading and digging.  I found myself suddenly working on a lot of Clare articles over recent days, having "arrived" here via a trawl of my many-years-built Watchlist, so I make no claims of undue expertise, and really appreciate corrections or questions.SeoR (talk) 20:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is a right or wrong in this matter. Even people who spent a considerable amount of time studying the area like Tim Robinson or George Cunningham acknowledged the ambiguity of what "the Burren" actually refers to.Drow69 (talk) 13:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

text: It should be made more clear that inside or outside The Burren depends on the used definition and not on the general consensus. The Banner talk 14:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Thanks, a good point.  And I guess it's a bit like (if milder) the debates that rage (and it is sometimes the word) over the definition of Connemara. SeoR (talk) 09:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burren?
Talk:Knappogue Castle

message: I took out this unsourced stuff, as it seems to be a bunch of baloney:
In the 1920s, a local farmer leased the Knappogue castlelands as grazing land for his cattle. One of the cows wandered into the castle, which by this time had fallen into disrepair. The cow wandered up the stone stairs, stepped out onto the crumbling wood floor, and fell to its death on the stones below. As compensation for the lost cow, ownership of the castle and its surrounding lands were granted to the farmer, who continued to graze cattle there.
Most of the other material was almost verbatim from the Shannon Heritage website, so I made some more changes that should give this article a more appropriate tone.
Drow69 (talk) 15:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The tale of the doomed cow
Talk:O'Dea Castle

message: Irishtourism.com seems to be a private/commercial tourism site. it is not the official Tourist Board. Is that really a reliable source?Drow69 (talk) 11:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact a more interesting question is: is the description relevant? I doubt that. The Banner talk 12:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a little publication (map/leaflet) at home on the Dysert O'Dea site, mainly on the Monastery but there may be stuff on the castle in it, too. If so, maybe I can just substitute that for the quote.Drow69 (talk) 15:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better!  The Banner talk 18:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RS?
Talk:Authentic Science Fiction

message: Oops, typo above.  I meant that science fiction uses "SF", not "sf".  So there is WP precedent for "SF", not "sf"; there precedents outside WP for "sf". Mike Christie (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as there are scholarly precedents for "sf", I think you are fine. Awadewit | talk 01:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SF vs sf

message: The category and white space edits look fine to me, but I'm not sure the "See also" section is worth it -- several of the magazines linked don't really apply here (online, fantasy, horror), and I doubt if "magazine" is worth linking to.  The lead already links to  both magazine and science fiction magazine, so I think those are both unnecessary.  Any thoughts?  Mike Christie (talk) 12:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The two category additions were useful, but the categories that were removed should stay in, as they still apply.  All the 'See alsos' were irrelevant or redundant, and didn't show an understanding of WP:ALSO.  The  template was wrong too, since the article isn't named in it.  I've done the reversions.  When an article is FA you have to be ruthless about reverting edits that degrade its quality....   Wasted Time R (talk) 13:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pmcalduff has been making similar edits to quite a few other magazine articles, including two other FAs, Beyond Fantasy Fiction and Fantastic Universe.  I'll revert some of them myself; but I'm not clear about this point you make: "The  template was wrong too, since the article isn't named in it."  What does that mean?  I'm not particularly au fait with templates and categories; can you explain? Mike Christie (talk) 13:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally navigational templates are used only in the articles they directly link to.  So, for example, Template:Musical notation is used in the article Time signature, and when it appears there, the "Time signature" link is replaced by bolding, to indicate that that is where you "are" within the template.  See WP:NAV for more.  However Template:Science fiction doesn't seem to do this; the articles pointed to it, such as Hard science fiction or Time travel in fiction, don't include the template.  That makes no sense to me.  Instead, the template is just being included in a bunch of articles about specific books, magazines, etc. ... so it's not being used in the typical navigational sense.  Maybe this is per the design of the template creators, or maybe Pmcalduff has just gone off on his/her own.  Wasted Time R (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, now I understand.  Thanks for the clarification.  Mike Christie (talk) 14:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits by Pmcalduf
Talk:Dunguaire Castle

message: I put together some info from 
1) a couple of websites (however, the contents are all suspiciously similar to what the Shannon Heritage site has to say)
2) other wikipedia pages (also from the German version). Unfortunately, a couple of these other wikipedia pages were not clearly sourced (to put it mildly), either.
My books on the architecture and history of the region are all in Ireland and I won't be able to get my hands on them for a while.
If anyone has access to sources that confirm or contradict what I put together, please feel free to add.
The Kinvara wikipedia entry has some additional information on who actually built the castle, but this also lacks citations...
Drow69 (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why wouldn't Shannon Heritage be a reliable source? As long as we avoid any promtotional POV language, I doubt that they've just made stuff up. Don't they have paid historians on staff to manage and promote their historic properties? postdlf (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Dearth of Sources 

message: This photo was "highly commended" (one of the 10 best Ireland photos) in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018. Is it worth using in the article? Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 23:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo to include?
Talk:Dunkerron Castle

message: I'm largely just talking to myself here, but I thought it might be worth adding a note on dates (I guess for any following editors). 
* Date of build - While some sources imply that the Dunkerron castle/tower dates to 1596, this is almost certainly a misnomer. Likely these sources are taking the date from the well-documented 1596 inscription - which attributes "this work" to O'Sullivan Mór and his MacCarthy Reagh wife. However the "work" in question is not the entire/original tower house. Rather, "this work" is likely the Tudor-era court house which was added later (including the fireplace - if the plaque was originally placed there, as suggested by Du Noyer. Or the well - if the plaque was placed/moved there, as suggested by the JCHAS Errata). In any event, whether "this work" was the entire court house, the fireplace of that court house, or its nearby well, "this work" unequivocally did not refer to the tower house. Which is unquestionably Norman in form/origin.
* Date or ruin/abandon - I'd hoped to add something a bit more concrete on when the castle was abandoned/ruined. However, while it was definitely a ruin by the very early 1800s, and possibly largely abandoned by the early 1700s, whether and when it fell beyond use is not entirely clear. The only academic text that I found (that speaks specifically to ruin/destruction) is Friar O'Sullivan's JCHAS note that Dunkerron and Cappanacush were both "burnt by Lord Musgry". But he doesn't give a date or specifics. It's possible that this burning was at the hands of the castles' own masters - to prevent capture during the Cromwellian/Confederate wars. But that may not align with Lewis's note on the defence of those castles at that time. So I left it out. I'm not happy with the "gap" this leaves. (But it's possibly better to have a "gap" than a "guess").
Unless someone has definitive source on whether/when/how the castle fell to ruin and abandon, I'm not really expecting a response to this thread. I'm just explaining myself (both to myself - and any following editor). Guliolopez (talk) 13:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Castle Oliver

message: What on earth is the point of having two articles for the same place?  A redirect will do the job. --GuillaumeTell (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Merge and redirect away. Guliolopez (talk) 02:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree. Sarah777 (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: All done.  I also omitted references in the text to the References and External links below as those interested will follow the links and/or look at the books.  Feel free to tweak. --GuillaumeTell (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:WLGI

message: Morning Inspiration- Hosted by Ernie Hilton 
Mid-Day Soul- Hosted by Tori
Afternoon Groove- Hosted by Jaden 
Evening Rhythms-  Hosted by Dennis Rawls
Night Shift- Hosted by TJAY Jones Cjayjone8 (talk) 01:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We do NOT include programme schedules as WP:NOTTVGUIDE which also covers radio "an article on a broadcaster should not list ... current schedules," - Arjayay (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio Programs
Talk:BRM P261

message: No inline citations, but clearly much better than most of our B class articles. So, shrug. :) 4u1e 17:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and now it has inline citations. So I'll delete the shrug. 4u1e 20:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A is better than GA; this article though isn't, it wouldn't probably make GA if reviewed. Fram (talk) 13:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Class=A
Talk:American Constitution Society

message: I propose modification of the reference to the Federalist Society because the Federalists isn't a "counterpart" to ACS; the organizations aren't affiliated or otherwise related, and there isn't much cross-over among members. Also, I'm not sure if the Federalists would describe themselves as conservative but rather as constitutional textualists or originalists. Plenty of members are libertarians and are not necessarily politically conservative.Res05e (talk) 14:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The long  and short of it is, this so-called "constitution society" is nothing more  or less than a cadre of lawyers dedicated to applying sophistry to oppose the constitutional limits to governmental power.   It should properly be called the anti-constitution society.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.255.206 (talk) 07:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The New York Times has a profile on the American Constitution Society, which could be used to add some more information to this article, so it doesn't look so much like a press release. 
— Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 04:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Times Profile 

message: "The American Constitution Society had omitted Lincoln’s reference to the United States as a nation under God from the address he gave at the dedication of the burial ground at Gettysburg", writes Robert P. George, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, in his article God and Gettysburg. "At the time, staring at the text, I wondered whether it was an innocent, inadvertent error—a typo, perhaps. It seemed more likely, though, that here is the apex of the secularist ideology that has attained a status not unlike that of religious orthodoxy among liberal legal scholars and political activists. Nothing is sacred, as it were—not even the facts of American history, not even the words spoken by Abraham Lincoln at the most solemn ceremony of our nation’s history." Asteriks (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lincoln misquoted: Is the ACS "the apex of the secularist ideology"? 
Talk:Russian Space Research Institute

message: Editors, perhaps you can make a factual addition by creating a new category "Further Reading" and adding a new book that has the words "Space Research Institute" in its title. To the best of my knowledge this is the only such English-language book in the world. "Mike Gruntman, My Fifteen Years at IKI, the Space Research Institute: Position-Sensitive Detectors and Energetic Neutral Atoms Behind the Iron Curtain, 2022, ISBN 9798985668704"  See also on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Fifteen-Years-Space-Research-Institute/dp/B09RG1CRPS/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2JBPBRX85MA0K&keywords=9798985668704&qid=1645655532&s=books&sprefix=9798985668704%2Cstripbooks%2C104&sr=1-1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8802:6919:8100:4827:9ad0:30f4:a44f (talk) 22:45, February 23, 2022 (UTC)
: Amazon is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. In order for this information to be added, a reliable source is needed to verify the information. Z1720 (talk) 01:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 23 February 2022
Talk:Alexey Ekimyan

message: This article is simply not comprehensive enough to be FA
*If this guy was the director of police and held such high posts, he would be very notable, since he would in charge of rounding up dissidents in a police state in the 2nd most powerful country in the world
*More info needed all round
*Fair Use banner needs a specific rationale
*Footnotes need to be immediately after punctuation marks
*References need to be filled in properly
Regards, Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 03:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA failed 
Talk:History of Dutch Nationality

message: I think this qualifies as a  fork of History_of_the_Netherlands. If there's a substantially different reasons for this article, please feel free to clue me in. Cheers, --Bfigura (talk) 01:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Forking

message: This article is a work in progress. There is very little information on wikipedia about the History of Nationalities. I am doing research on the topic right now, and even though the article is linked with History of the Netherlands it is not the history of the Netherlands but rather a history of the people and the formation of what is now the Dutch nationality. Please leave this page alone in as much as it will improve over a short period of time. Thank you for your cooperation! -Aleksandrovna
I deleted the delete message, because I know that Aleksandrovna is working on this page, and will make it different from the History of Netherlands page.  Will Hanley 16:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Work In Progress