Talk:Saw V

message: The "plot" section is a total recounting and spoiler of the film.  It should have a warning prior.  "Plot" implies the gist of the story, not a total spoiler.  156.111.160.114 (talk) 04:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, you are the most wrong person on earth. Read WP:SPOILER. Darrenhusted (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And you should read Wikipedia:Civility, which is a policy. If someone thinks "plot" implies the gist of a story, not the entire story, who are you to tell them different? That anonymous editor can add a spoiler warning if they want (although I'm 100% certain it will be removed). --Pixelface (talk) 11:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Every Saws on wiki are spoiled. That's not new. On the french wiki we try not to spoil it. Nico92400 (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  spoiler 

message: The discussing of the entire plot occurring in the movie, particularly the second half of the plot, is a gigantic edit fuck fest. People are shorting it, leaving out valuable info, sometimes adding redundant terms etc. Something needs to be done here. Comparing the current plot info on the Saw V article with every other movie the whole thing is slack written, and the currently written ending in the article at this point, which doesn't give a specific reason for Strahm not being able to escape the room, is like pinpointing the movie for being generally illogical and badly written in terms of sense. The plot isn't written according to the timeline either, instead it's combining it all in different sections, and it also leaves out the infamous plot twists of the Saw movies, which there even were two of in this movie. Carbo45 (talk) 17:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you (or anyone) know how to fix it, then go ahead. I've only seen it once and I don't plan on seeing it anytime soon so I wouldn't be the best one to edit it.--CyberGhostface (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Something which, I did. Mostly adding the info regarding the ending plot twist, which then later on got replaced. I'll try adding it again tomorrow, the point is that it never seems to stay solid, which is why things at this point seems a lot messier compared to other sections of the article. Carbo45 (talk) 19:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with Carbo45, people are shorting it and it kills the significance of certain matters. I made an edit to the part about the five working together that was very significant and someone removed it stating that it was 'excessive'. It's not excessive, it explains and justifies why it is said that they were supposed to work together to get to the last game. It's called backing up the statement. How is that excessive?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by General DarkBlood (talk • contribs) 11:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand by my removal - excessively detailed (simply stating the team requirement is sufficient), turned the already long paragraph into a nightmarish wall o' text, hard to read due to sentence readability/text flow issues.  Millahnna (talk) 12:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Editing 

message: since factual details are becoming available, isn't it time to make a Saw VI article yet? 68.185.167.117 (talk) 08:17, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: a clip on youtube ? man i don t think so. But I agree , Saw 6 page should already have been created. However Saw 5 page has been created on 6 december 2007 Nico92400 (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, although Youtube is anything but reliable. If you could show a link to the video you found I could see if I can validate it. Regardless, Saw VI has began filming according to: Lionsgate, Bloody-Disgusting, Movie Moron, and many other sites. Therefore, WP:NFF does not apply and the Saw VI article should be made immediately. I have a well written and cited draft I will put on tonight. GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

text: No, it's not. Some moron spliced together footage of an old Cary Elwes film with Saw music and scenes from the first film. Nothing more.--CyberGhostface (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saw VI