Talk:Kenny Richey

message: Hello Zzzzz78759, I'm afraid I don't understand your argument - remember that the murder and arson charges charges were dropped. The prosecution alleged murder and arson and then withdrew those allegations. The final outcome of his cas was that he was not "convicted" of any charges.
Certainly  there should be more detail of his life after release, I'm afraid I haven't time to do it. (donso (talk) 23:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your kind words. I have no objections to any improvements in this article. It's a very controversial case, and I think it's important to be as NPOV as possible because I'll bet this is a fairly popular page. Marklemagne 21:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below and WP:UCN. Dekimasuよ! 14:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I stated on my talk page, I moved the page because Kenneth Richey had been tagged with , suggesting an uncontroversial move, which this clearly is not. I will restore the page to Kenny Richey shortly. I will also move-protect the page to allow for consensus to form prior to another (potential) move. Sorry about that! -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much :) --supernorton 05:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
*See Kenny Dalglish. Discussion ended:)) Malick78 (talk) 08:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Oppose. The nickname can be used since it is the most commonly known name. That's why Bill Clinton and O.J. Simpson are not named William Jefferson Clinton and Orenthal James Simpson respectively.  A Google test shows 28700 vs 746 in favor of "Kenny Richey". --supernorton 05:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This page has been moved by User:Flyguy649 WITHOUT consensus, and the action was taken only one day after the move was proposed. --supernorton 10:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I stated on my talk page, I moved the page because Kenneth Richey had been tagged with , suggesting an uncontroversial move, which this clearly is not. I will restore the page to Kenny Richey shortly. I will also move-protect the page to allow for consensus to form prior to another (potential) move. Sorry about that! -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 15:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much :) --supernorton 05:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
*See Kenny Dalglish. Discussion ended:)) Malick78 (talk) 08:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: This article has been flagged as biased for almost a year now. Does anybody really think it is, or can this tag be removed?Padonsouth  —Preceding comment was added at 01:00, 27 October 2007 
(UTC) 
Once again: has anybody got any objection to removing the 'biased' flag?
As I see it the information included by Marklemagne, which is essentially a summary of the court records of the first trial, could be edited into a more coherent statement of the prosecution case. I don't have any information to add and I think it would be good if someone would work on that. In general I think it's balanced enough and so I'm proposing to delete the bias flag. Ok?
You proposed it be removed, then 5 minutes later removed the POV tag yourself?  I still think the article is quite bias.  Adding the POV tag again!--K8TEK 20:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias? 

message: This article needs to be checked by someone with a good understanding of NPOV. Basically the 'Prosecution case' section consists of prosecution testimony taken from the court record of the original trial. Inferences from this testimony led to Richey's conviction. Perhaps it needs to be collated into a more coherent argument, but without the trial documents to hand, this writer is not in a position to do so.
While the prosecution case has remained static over the years, a large amount of information has emerged in refutation, eventually leading to the conviction being overturned. Does the newness of this information lead to a perception of bias? 
The arguments will be revisited at the new trial scheduled for March 2008. This article is likely to become very widely consulted given the international media attention. Any suggestions for improvement  are welcome.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Padonsouth (talk • contribs) 18:34, November 20, 2007
It looks to me like the neutrality/POV complaints are that the article is NOT sufficiently biased against Richey. 66.218.190.100 (talk) 22:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination for a check on neutrality

message: If he was born in the Netherlands and actually lived there "long enough", he may still have Dutch citizenship in addition to his other citizenships. This may have to be investigated too. I'm not just saying this idly. I'm a Dutch citizen living abroad and have, for several personal reasons, looked into Dutch laws regarding citizenship several times. Whether or not someone actually "pursues" (as in "getting a passport") Dutch citizenship, one automatically IS a Dutch citizen in several cases, just like someone born in the United States automatically is a citizen, regardless of whether that person's parents are, say, illegal aliens. There are some laws in the Netherlands that will cause a person who was a Dutch citizen "automatically" to lose his/her citizenship, though. He may actually have triple citizenship. wjmt (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: completely agree with the Kenny name reference. he was bred Scottish. All Scots are known as Kenny. Only the English use the full name Kenneth so a Scotsman wouldn't have that name for love or money. Boils (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 17:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Kenneth McKellar? Manormadman (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name 

message: :Image:Ken richey.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ken richey.png

message: For example: "Shirley Baker also recalls Richey saying, "A Building was going to burn * * *."
If it indicates an unfinished quote, why not use dots as is the usual standard? ("A building was going to burn...") Asterisks look very strange unless they happen to be a direct quote from official usage. 86.149.131.137 (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do the asterisks mean? 

message: I have to admit to not understanding fully the bail bond process, but is it really the case, as cited in the article, that bail bonds are non-refundable? Or did the article mean to say that bail-bond fees are not refundable? Kirbett (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bail bond non-refundable? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kenny Richey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121022073606/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article5860743.ece to http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article5860743.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 21:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kenny Richey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123040643/http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/Richey-sees-his-retrial-as-1st-fair-shot-1350-46.html to http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/Richey-sees-his-retrial-as-1st-fair-shot-1350-46.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123052800/http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/Prosecutor-opposes-a-change-of-venue-in-Richey-case-1355-46.html to http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/Prosecutor-opposes-a-change-of-venue-in-Richey-case-1355-46.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828140842/http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/Richeys-legal-team-files-motions-1354-46.html to http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/Richeys-legal-team-files-motions-1354-46.html
*Added  tag to http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.1932869.0.0.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516150826/http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/The-Plea-1375-46.html to http://torley.org/Kenny-Richey/Kenny-Richey/The-Plea-1375-46.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kenny Richey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100824055311/http://www.brainerddispatch.com/stories/011210/new_20100112002.shtml to http://www.brainerddispatch.com/stories/011210/new_20100112002.shtml
*Added  tag to http://hardy.amnesty.org.uk/news/press/15299.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051026124445/http://www.ohiodeathrow.com/ to http://www.ohiodeathrow.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified