lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Batch

message: As noted in the article's edit history, I did my best to clean up the disambig page following MOS:DP. I created the "related topics" section, even though I don't think any of those links should properly be on the page since as far as I know, people don't refer to any of them simply as "batch", because people seem to like to link to batch when talking about batch production or batch processing or whatever, even if they then include a link to batch production or batch processing, as if the batch itself were a separate concept. All such links to batch could just be corrected, but more people would probably do it in the future, so it should probably just be accepted.
Anyway, along with other cleanup, I also removed all the entries for which there was no Wikilink, per MOS:DP; I gambled that nobody was about to create an article about coal heaps in Somerset or whatever. Propaniac 15:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Beacon frame

message: :: your footnotes appear to be invalid. Specifically, http://mobile.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/print.php/1492071 returns a 404 not found on wi-fiplanet.com. Darr247 (talk) 17:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems OK to me. ~Kvng (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: http://mobile.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/print.php/1492071  links to https://www.hardwarecentral.com/reviews/best-wifi-routers-large-house/ which is about router selection rather than beacon frames Salindor (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes
Talk:Orders in Council (1807)

message: I see this page is to be cleaned up... I'm not sure how to go about it, but the title of the page is wrong. What is being referred to as an 'Order of Council' is in fact a species of Order-in-Council. An Order of Council, by contrast, tends to be a byelaw of a body which is regulated by the Privy Council.
The author is referring to one use of the Royal Prerogative, exercised by way of Order-in-Council. This website is quite helpful, and provides links to the actual Orders: http://www.napoleon-series.org/research/government/british/decrees/c_britdecrees1.html. Hope this helps... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.46.184.244 (talk) 
Order in Council or Orders in Council?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.28.72.179 (talk) 21:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

message: What's the meaning of "two days later"? --Jeremyb (talk) 04:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned up the lead section to make its structure make more sense. Mentioning "American history" before establishing the context as the War of 1812 just makes the article look US-centric. (It mostly wasn't, except for the comparison to US presidential executive orders, which is only enlightening if you assume a greater familiarity with American law than British law.) The "two days" was wrong, anyway: according to the article War of 1812, war was declared on 18 June, but Lord Liverpool repealed the orders on 23 June - five days later, not two days before - and didn't send a diplomatic envoy with the news for another five days, on 28 June. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing (wrong?) wording re timing of declaration
Template talk:Japanese writing

message: This template was listed for deletion on Templates for Deletion.  The decision was to keep this template.  Please see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted/April 2005 for more information. -Frazzydee|✍ 23:27, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TfD'd

message: I just removed :Category:Japanese language from the template, since most of the articles it appears on are already in the kana or kanji categories, which are both subcats of Japanese language, making that category redundant.  — Gwalla | Talk 08:00, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Shouldn't Romaji be down as Rōmaji due to the way it's spelt using Katakana. The Rōmaji article also uses this version.Bennity 00:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I changed it, let me know if there is a reason why it shouldn't be this way. Bennity 15:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rōmaji 

message: So much for keeping it simple. Now the template helpfully links to articles that don't even exist! adamrice 15:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, the sheer size of the thing is causing grief now on Katakana where it hides almost half of the katakana table. Those changes should probably be reverted. Hairy Dude 01:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ouch 

message: Japanese writing
Kanji 漢字
*Kyūjitai 旧字体
*Shinjitai 新字体
Kana 仮名
*Hiragana 平仮名
*Katakana 片仮名
*Hentaigana 変体仮名
*Manyogana 万葉仮名
Uses
*Furigana 振り仮名
*Okurigana 送り仮名
Kana orthographies
*Ancient kana usage 上代特殊仮名遣
*Historical kana usage 歴史的仮名遣
**Teika kana usage 定家仮名遣
**Gyōa kana usage 行阿仮名遣
**Keichū kana usage 契沖仮名遣
**Permitted kana usage 許容仮名遣
*Modern kana usage 現代仮名遣い
Registers of Japanese
* Bungo 文語
* Kūgo 口語
Rōmaji ローマ字
* Hepburn ヘボン式
* Nihon-shiki 日本式
* Kunrei-shiki 訓令式
* JSL JLS
* Wāpuro rōmaji ワープロローマ字
I appreciate that Yes0song put a lot of work into expanding this template, but I am reverting it.
* The length of the template was actually causing formatting problems with some articles.
* Many of the newly added links point to articles that don't exist--on either the en: or ja: side. I can't see the point of including them here.
* Some items, like 口語, aren't even a matter of writing. Others, like different romanization systems, have more to do with how Japanese is represented in Western languages than with how ローマ字 is used in Japanese.
My own attitude towards templates like this is "less is more." Put the main points in there, but don't try to make it an exhaustive index. And obviously this informs my decision to revert. adamrice 15:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting to simpler form 

message: That's much nicer, thank you. adamrice 05:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  書 graphic 

message: I considered changing this template to use , but since I didn’t quite like what I got I’m archiving it here for others or future generations to play with. — Christoph Päper 14:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Since when is JSL a transliteration? It is a phonemic transcription. --95.53.164.130 (talk) 12:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  JSL romanization
Talk:Teela Brown

message: Hello...  I've read the Ringworld Engineers, which is the last book in the series and (erm, spoilers ahead?) the statement in this article that mentions that Teela's luck is shrugged off as nothing real is basically false, as Teela brown makes an appearance near the end of this novel, as a Pak Protector, and her luck is a huge pain in Louis's side as her Pak insticts prevent her from doing what she wants to do.  I haven't read enough of the rest of the series to comment on this, though - I'm just wondering if someone else who is a more hardcore fan could edit this and give Teela Brown the credit she should deserve ^^;
:In addition, the dismissiveness and criticism of Teela Brown as the worst and most implausible element is severely out of place for a Wikipedia entry. --maru  (talk) contribs 16:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Engineers is the second book not the last chrisboote 14:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. I have read 1+2+4 of the Ringworld series, and I didn't get the impression of Teela being pulled down all that much. A more balanced view with "some people think" phrasings would be much better. --217.189.200.57 00:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Aramaic emphatics.ogg

message: Very cool to have this! But isn't the volume of this file a bit low?  — mark ✎ 10:58, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, the volume is too low. I've worked out how to use the normalise feature on Audacity so I could reload the file with a better volume. --Gareth Hughes 22:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, great!  — mark ✎ 16:17, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Still very low in volume to my ears... or there must be a caching problem and I'm getting the old version (if that's possible?). I've given it a try in Sound Forge and normalized it to a -20 dB RMS level (I'm not fully sure what that means, but in any case, the 'Speech' preset puts it at -10dB and that's a little too loud, causing some distortion). I've also applied a modest noise gate to get rid of the buzz in the silent parts. Download here. What do you think?  — mark ✎ 10:59, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Russell Earl Marker

message: What is Harry Ricardo's part in the development of the octane numbering system.? GraemeLeggett 11:25, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The move of this Wikipedia article (almost two years after its creation) without discussion on 7 February 2007 from "Russell Marker" to "Russell Earl Marker" was unwarranted and does not follow WP:NCP guidelines. Most articles about Russell Marker, refer to him as "Russell Marker", some articles refer to him as "Russell E. Marker" (the name he used on his scientific publications). This article should be renamed back to its original title "Russell Marker".
69.208.203.52 03:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move from "Russell Marker" to "Russell Earl Marker" 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Hut 8.5 00:00, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I am the program coordinator of the ACS-National Historic Chemical Landmarks program. I have updated the references to ACS-NHCL web content, as those pages have been replaced by (http://portal.acs.org/portal/PublicWebSite/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/progesteronesynthesis/index.htm). The old pages will be discontinued in the coming months. KLindblom (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Update External Link
Talk:Bill McKibben

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: Why is this in the Views section? I cannot think of another place at the moment though. --Hob Gadling (talk) 11:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views 

message: I notice only one bare URL in the references, https://350.org/team/#board, presently reference 36. Unless someone points out others (which perhaps there are), I'll add some text and delete the Cleanup bare URLs template. Bret Sterling (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bare URLs? 

message: I am concerned that nowhere in McKibben’s Wikipedia write up is it mentioned that he now supports nuclear power. 2601:19B:C800:3540:8A:6EB7:2E57:ECD8 (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  McKibben supports nukes
Talk:Homology theory

message: To single out one sentence (in bold) from the "simplest case" given in the "Simple explanation":
:"At the intuitive level homology is taken to be an equivalence relation [on chains] [...]. The simplest case is in graph theory, with C and D vertices and homology with a meaning coming from the oriented edge E from P to Q having boundary Q — P. A collection of edges from D to C, each one joining up to the one before, is a homology. In general, a k-chain is thought of as [...]"
Again, what on earth does this mean? How exactly does a collection of edges from D to C correspond to an equivalence relation on chains? What does it mean for one edge to be "before" another edge, in a collection of edges? What would it mean for two edges from D to C not to "join up" to each other?
This wouldn't be so frustrating if there were references and external links.
Buster79 23:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this complete nonsense?

message: This article has been merged into Homology (mathematics) and Cohomology due to a huge overlap; there was no material that was separate from these two articles. This article could be recreated in the future, but would need something new.Brirush (talk) 17:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Glossary of rail transport terms

message: The first paragraph's discussion of railroad vs. railway is a bit misleading. If you look at lists such as List_of_Class_I_railroads or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_Class_I_railroads_in_the_United_States, you see that railway is a widely-used term in the US. ColinClark (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of railway in the US. 

message: Is there a better source for this? Or is it not a common term? (not watching, please ) czar 15:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Paperwork" 

message: A while ago I read an article in a mathematics journal analyzing routing with railroad track sidings and spurs.  The authors used the terms backwards from how I've understood over the decades, so I emailed them about it and referred to this page.  But now I realize the term "spur" is not included in the page's list.  I have also understood since that (1) the authors of the article were British and perhaps there the use of the terms are reversed from the US, and (2) perhaps there is just not a formal and "correct" definition of "spur".  If anyone can help it sure would be great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.255.20 (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spur 

message: Hello,
The Internet Archive website has an old and comprehensive dictionary of American/British locomotives. Since it dates from 1906. it may be [mostly] irrelevant for modern days locomotives. Please take look; it may hold many relevant information for Wikipedia.
Thank you,
Marino 12:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locomotive dictionary 

message: This page presently gives no indication of where and when a term was used. When adding new terms or editing old ones, please check to make sure the term is either global or local, and if it is the latter, edit the definition to make it clear where it is used. Eldomtom2 (talk) 08:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please be sure to mark what countries a term applies to
Talk:A.C. Green

message: It's loaded with opinion and NPOV, the whole thing is one long rambling paragraph, and most important, it cites no sources for its claims. wikipediatrix 23:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs an overhaul

message: His first name is A.C., same as his father.  It doesn't stand for anything else, and there is no middle name, so there is no space. http://www.acgreen.com/acgreen/index.html --Edgewise (talk) 11:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is there a space in "A.C."?

message: Do not know how the following revision... 
13:00, 6 February 2009 99.238.101.39
Did not get caught earlier but A.C. Green did not play for the Toronto Raptors. 
--Bazzledorf (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teams Played for 

message: Check what follows "american" in the info box's nationality: is that acceptable?
--Alextrade2404 (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Lonsdale (clothing)

message: The term "mid 2000s" can refer to any of 3 things:
• around 2005
• around 2050
• around 2500
Although the latter two do not make any sense yet in relation to the article, it may be better to refer to "the mid 2000s decade" for the sake of disambiguation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s Alastair.callum (talk) 11:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date ambiguity

message: * It is far not only in the Netherleands (for example it is the same in Hungary).--84.0.240.4 20:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Netherlands
Talk:University of Warwick Students' Union

message: *I've started a discussion on Chriscf's Talk Page as this involve all the union's page. Please go there to provide your opinion if you're interested. -- KTC 16:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Students' Union / Association sabs list deletion 

message: I have added some more information, linking to the full list of Societies and Clubs running at present.--Shastrix 13:58, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated the number of socities and sports clubs as well as correcting the links for each. --Shastrix 19:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Societies 

message: Why should the "criticism" section go into such detail on points that can be and are leveled (rightly or wrongly) at pretty much any student political organisation?  Low turnout, the rather odd nature of Sabb positions, and so on are hardly unique to Warwick.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.82.83.149 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It's a bit ridiculous to have such a long list, especially as none of the gripes have been cited. If it doesn't get sorted out soon, I'll trim the section. 82.3.220.150 (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody really has an axe to grind, don't they? 

message: Large amount of content removed by JamesBWatson] "(Removing content which is of interest perhaps to members, but not of general encyclopaedic value. This is an encyclopaedia article, not a prospectus or brochure for the union.)"
I feel that some of this content was encyclopaedic and should be reinstated.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Warwick_Students%27_Union&curid=389846&diff=523209262&oldid=523153551
John Cross (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: large amount of content removed
Talk:Congress

message: Has anyone put together a cost analysis for buying votes in congress?  How much does it cost?  Is it dependent on how controversial the vote is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.109.195.126 (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost of buying congress

message: Can someone please explain what this means: "A congress is different from a president (Westminster System of Government) in that legislative initiative is vested into it."
I also note that Congressional system is a Redirect to Presidential system: should it be? --Mais oui! 08:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: The article on Parliament added a map of the world highlighting countries that have a parliament.  Something similar for Congress would be good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.87.213.98 (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams 

message: Aa Bb Cc Dd Ee Ff Gg Hh Ii Jj Kk Ll Mm Nn Oo Pp Qq Rr Ss Tt Uu Vv Ww Xx Yy Zz  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.131.76.130 (talk) 19:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HOLA 

message: [http://www.myspace.com/~tButton  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.131.76.130 (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey  

message: I've noticed there isn't anything here about bipartisan congresses which are common in presidential systems. --Trrri333 (talk) 23:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bipartisan Congress 

message: When a national legislature is referred to as a "Congress" does that necessarily refer to a presidential system? In other words, is the term "Congress" necessarily distinct from the term "Parliament"? If so, it should be the first thing mentioned in this article. If not, this article should be deleted and replaced with a disambiguation page. The generic term would then be "legislature" not "Congress." Bostoner (talk) 03:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliamentary Systems 

message: I have reverted the bold removal of virtually all the content. Such established articles merit discussion first. Please offer arguments in this section. The article is, admittedly, a mess and something does need to be done. My preferred action would be a move to List of congresses with a definition of scope and the consequential significant editing. An alternative would be to cut down into List of political congresses, for example, if having all congresses together is considered too broad in scope. TerriersFan (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future/scope of this article 

message: Isn't this also a older name for the social gathering of baboons? --41.151.210.218 (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  baboons
Talk:Postal services in Andorra

message: The article says "Both postal administrations issue their own postage stamps for use in Andorra featuring unique designs," and references https://news.abs-cbn.com/global-filipino/07/18/14/andorra-honors-pinoys-stamp.
I cannot see, why this article may serve as a source for both postal administrations issuing their own stamps. It says rather, the spanish postal services issued a specific stamp. Does the french postal service issue stamps at all? Do you know a better source? --2A01:C22:B9EC:6500:E059:E482:47C0:A664 (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stamps by both postal administrations?
Template talk:Cadillac timeline 1930-1979

message: While this is a very nice timeline, some of the descriptions did need revising. First, there is no such thing as Large-size vs. Full-size. A car is either full-size, or not. For this I put in a rowspan. Also, Value and Entry-level, again the same thing; thus I also put in a rowspan for these two descriptions. Also, the Seville was a full-size sedan during its last generation, but I think that would make the timeline to complex. BTW: The description "Luxury" is not specific enough, all Caddis are luxury cars, the Eldorado was personal lux. Regards, Signaturebrendel 02:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large-size 

message: I don't know the usual resolution of Wikipedia's readers, but this timeline is far too wide. I can split is in two (Early Cadillac vehicles and Modern Cadillac vehicles), but I won't rename every article! Can someone do that with an external tool? -- NaBUru38 03:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the timeline 

message: I'd do this myself, but it seems rather daunting. Anyway, someone needs to edit in the upcoming CTC. Vegasrebel29 05:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadillac CTC
Talk:Ja Rule

message: I propose that Ja Rule be listed as a spinoff of Irv Gotti. I've seen other articles like Bobby Valentino and Estelle be listed as spinoffs of Ludacris and John Legend, so Ja Rule should be a spinoff of Irv Gotti. JuanBoss105 (talk) 22:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a look at Template:Infobox musical artist, and it says that the parameter is only used when referring to groups, not solo artists. Describing a solo artist as a spinoff of another solo artist doesn't make sense to me. Throast  me! (talk | contribs) 22:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spinoff