Talk:Grimmjow Jeagerjaques

message: I got rid of that line as frankly it's very misleading and makes Grimmjow seem stronger than he actually is - beating someone who wasn't serious with a sneak attack shouldn't be mentioned amongst his abilities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.91.103 (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And I suppose we are allowed to say he was being serious but Ulquiorra wasnt? Both were using their fists and Grimmjow subdued Ulquiorra. End. Putting it back. 209.83.240.60 (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree, to say that Ulquiorra wasn't being serious and Grimmjow was is complete original research. StardustDragon 23:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Grimmjow did not fight on par with and subdue Ulquiorra. He used that Negacion thing to trap him. The line is misleading because there is no evidence of Grimmjow being able to fight on par with Ulquiorra. The only indicator would be their common opponent Ichigo. He could barely touch Ulquiorra in an unreleased state, yet was able to defeat Grimmjow in his released state. This would indicate that he cannot fight on par with Ulquiorra. So I think the line should be removed. HoBoSlayerX (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgive me if I'm wrong, but didn't Ichigo get stronger in between the fight with Ulquiorra and Grimmjow, because he could maintain his vizard form for much much longer? And forgive me if I'm wrong, but if Grimmjow takes Ulquiorra out of the picture so that he can fight Ichigo, whether he uses the Caja Negacion or not, isn't that "subduing" him? StardustDragon 23:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed up the line in the article, see if that sums up the incident better. StardustDragon 23:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont think there is enough evidence to support him being that strong, he only claimed to be so. But just to not let what happened with Ichigo happen here Stardust, I will compromise, change it, and well see if thats acceptable. The problem I had with it was just HOW powerful it made him sound. HoBoSlayerX (talk) 04:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see someone has deleted the whole line now. HoBoSlayerX (talk) 04:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight on par with Ulquiorra? 

message: This is something I noticed, but the coloring of his zanpakutou sheath is different in almost every medium: the anime depicts it as light blue, the manga shows it as a deep blue, while the games depict it as white.  I think it might be significant to state these changes, ya?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.35.2 (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zanpakutou Color 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow_%28song%29 The coincidence seems a bit to great, I think this might be added somewhere.Gnave (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it does seem like a coincidence to me. Maybe it's not, but overall the name Pantera matches the trend of other arrancar zanpakutō naming. Besides, out of all hollows that were revealed so far, why Grimmjow? -- Ynhockey (Talk) 18:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I remember reading somewhere that each Bleach character is associated with some songs. Grimmjow was originally associated with Slipknot (as seen in the shape of the sword guard). Associate him with Pantera, the other famous metal fan, is not out of question. 75.156.106.105 (talk) 08:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zanpaktou's Name Origin 

message: I think the true meaning of desgarrón implies the idea of big, not just a tear because the sufix 
-ón means bigger in Spanish, so it shouldn't be considered just as  tear, big tear is more exact.
Desgarron means slash in spanish  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.215.119 (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The true meaning of Desgarrón'' 

message: Now its time for a real discussion! Grimmjow hair was first dark blue when first introduced to the time he went back to hueco mundo but it suddenly turned light blue. could this be a HUGE refference to Gamma Akutabi?Grimmjow E6 (talk) 04:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was because it was night-time. References to Gamma are out of the question until Kubo says it's for real. StardustDragon 23:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HAIR 

message: Shouldn't Grimmjow's similarity to Gamma from Zombie Powder be mentioned? Luis Dantas (talk) 11:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zombie Powder 

message: What is this tag referring to; the synopsis or outline? StardustDragon 03:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole article. It has one section containing one sentence of real world info, then a huge amount of plot, mostly written in-universe, then another two sentence real world section (unsourced). For the article length, its pretty much 95% plot (or more). As such, it shows not actual notability for the character even having an article, which is why it is tagged for merge. If no other real world information is available beyond those three sentences, the merge should be done. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, right. The only thing I have against the merge is how long Grimmjow's section will be compared to the rest. The merge discussion has been going on for a while and nobody's had the balls to actually do something. I've done my best to make this article better, but I'm fine with merging it if we can maintain most of the info contained in this page. StardustDragon 03:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, this page has too much information. It needs to be trimmed down to the major points, rather than such extensive details. See List of Naruto characters for possible ideas on ways to write the section (its the result of massive amounts of merging). -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, i tried to cut out a lot of pointless crap. Still sucks though. StardustDragon 04:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Can I get rid of the History section and put that in one sentence in Synopsis? StardustDragon 14:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. Much of the outline can also be summarized into just a few sentences. That would get it closer to being ready for merging. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't even take a sentence. Got 'er done. 24.249.192.40 (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, though in the future try to use a more polite edit summary. While it wasn't something that belonged here, that was a bit rude. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Plot summary too long"