Talk:Construction (RuneScape)

message: Could someone upload some high quality PNG images to replace these highly compressed JPEGs? I'd do it myself, but alas, no membership for me. Hyenaste (tell) 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know One person who Is very good at images on RuneScapeat Wikipedia:Tarikochi, perhaps we can be cheeky and ask Tarikochi for some help? I tried to make the images better, but I'm having some problems due to the images at the start were very bad. Not only that, the kitchen picture is virtually beyond saving. It looks hideous.J.J.Sagnella 06:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I offer up this image: Image:Wiki-kitchen.PNGMike 20:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's better than the current kitchen one. Not so sure the "walk here" should be there though. I would probably cut the top of it off. J.J.Sagnella 06:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe an image being taken at a horizontal angle, closer to the ground such as the image currently at the top of the article would look better?  I might be getting members again soon, so I can help with images.  Agentscott00(talk contribs) 18:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I do have my image request still up despite being away.  However, asking within the next week would probably be a good idea, as I'll be on a long vacation in a different country before returning.  TarikochiGalleryCriticize 20:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry the article won't go away when you're gone. Have a nice holiday, you've earned it. J.J.Sagnella 20:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not interested in obvious sarcasm Sagnella.  I'll fit these descriptions asked later today.  TarikochiGalleryCriticize 21:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Srry if it offended you. No harm meant. J.J.Sagnella 21:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: * I'm not a member, but has the majority of the construction tale been put forth in the article yet? Debate it, and if the result is Yes, I'll cross it off on the RuneScape page's ToDo list. p00rleno 12:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're asking whether this article is of a high standard as of now? Have a look at it and compare it to other articles. The answer is a deinitive No. J.J.Sagnella 15:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a side note here, I've noticed that you've been striking out most of the things on the To-Do list that still have some work to be done; keep in mind that most things on there do still need work, and just because something looks good doesn't mean it's up to standards.  Agentscott00(talk contribs) 16:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: okay, thanks 4 the feedback p00rleno 14:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it ready yet??? 

message: I made an article about the Rampage caused by the bug, could someone put it in the article, I tried but it got edited out by an admin, thuoght I better let someone more experienced do it after that...
here's a link the the article Falador World 111 Rampage
Shadoom1
:It wasn't an adminstrator... Besides, It was a minor event. It'll be forgotten soon. J.J.Sagnella 12:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the article to Proposed Deletion - we don't need it. Agentscott00(talk contribs) 16:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to do that, but I forgot. J.J.Sagnella 17:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: They were not being selfish, they were following Wikipedia's deletion policy, although the regular 5-day-period for proposed deletions wasn't followed.  The article had NO reliable sources (although some places may seem to have proper information, they are not considered to be proper citations per wikipedia policy, and are therefore unreliable), was overrun with English errors, and wasn't notable enough (not important/of enough significance) for its own article.  The event will be forgotten soon, and will not be remembered for "many years".  Already I am hearing almost nothing of this event except for vandalism edits on the Contstruction page — it has already faded away. If you have a problem with the deletion, and want it re-created, see WP:DRV, or contact Zoe, the user who deleted the article.  The log of the delete is located here. Agentscott00(talk contribs) 03:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

text: You are both the same ip address. And please sign your posts with four tides. (~~~~) J.J.Sagnella 10:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I've looked at most of the videos, and they are all the same version of one file - just edited for time/putting the uploader's name on it.  And we already know the user who made the most kills.  This subject simply isn't notable, and is NOT getting its own article. Agentscott00(talk contribs) 15:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text: If they want to find out what happened, they can use Google - it will turn out fansite pages showing what happened.  The world 111 massacre does not meet Wikipedia's article standards - if it did, then the article would not have been speedy-deleted.  You may consider the article necessary, but that is simply an opinion - and one that won't do much good.  One person thinking something is important is not enough to keep the article from being deleted.  As you said, the Jagex statements have been removed, so there are now even less citational references for the event.  Agentscott00(talk contribs) 16:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falador world 111 rampage 

message: Why is this article being proposed for deletion? its fine and theres articles about the other skillsShadoom1 08:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion 

message: I am one of those people whoa re interested in the world 111 slaughter...Fortunately I was on world 23(my usual world) at the time.--Centurion Ry 21:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: wasnt that the durial thing? theres a video of it happening on youtube somewhere felinoel 21:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Question 

message: i feel crests are an important thing in this skill, as well as the styles of homes you could choose from felinoel 21:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crests 

message: I don't see why this section was included in the guide. None of the points mentioned relate specifically to clans. Is it okay to delete it? --Christn 21:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Uses for clans" 

message: Did it occur on June 6 or June 5? I remember some sensationalising it saying June 6, but I recall the majority laughing saying it was only June 5. Hyenaste (tell) 21:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was June 6th in the morning I think.  It is sometimes referred to as the 666 event, or "The Devil's Day on RuneScape". Lardor 22:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date