lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Williams

message: In Steven Spielberg and George Lucas's Wikipedia Articles, they each have a section regarding their collaboration with Williams. Can, must, and should we do the same for Williams's Wikipedia Article? Because I would assume that Williams's work with Spielberg and Lucas is one of the biggest if not the biggest and most important aspect of Williams's career.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:CF80:7440:39BF:8A50:657A:405D (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A separate section for collaborations with Steven Spielberg and George Lucas ?  

message: The Image that I changed for the infobo was from 2009 and it was reverted to the 2007 image. Why was it reverted when I updated the image to a newer image?MasterD.D. Patel (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not my reversion, but probably because the newer image was a poor image. Canterbury Tail talk 14:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Given that both are musicians famous in large part via film work, should there perhaps be a somewhat more elaborate hatnote mentioning John Williams (guitarist) in particular?  And/or a mention of the other JW in the body of the article?  109.255.211.6 (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Johns Williamses 

message: It's not a genre. Any genre can be used as a film score. CompletePerson (talk) 08:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop adding film score to genres. 

message: Have always thought this was a terrible photograph of JW. Anything that could replace it? Dlh9690 (talk) 17:00, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: I looked up this composer after seeing a live interview with him, and wondering how old he was. He's 91 at this point, still working and quite compos mentis. IMHO this article is one of the best I've seen in crowdsourced editing, with the most of any individual contributing amounting to just over 6%. The third most is just over 3%. Activist (talk) 08:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality 

message: Is it really necessary to have the template NFL on NBC on the article?  Perhaps, John Williams did the music for the show, but I have seen countless documentaries on Williams and the NFL was never mentioned to my recollection.  It just seems way too prominent on the bottom relative to his extensive body of work in FILM.
If no one responds, I intend to delete the template.  --David Tornheim (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL on NBC
Talk:Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca

message: Kuchuk-Kainarji is the corrupted spelling of the Turkish name Küçük Kaynarca (Küçük=little). Check Britannica for confirmation www.britannica.com  68.160.138.191 08:18, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've moved the page per the Britannica article. —Khoikhoi 22:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Can somebody provide a cite for the information that this treaty granted the Ottoman Empire rights of protection with Russia? This wasn't mentioned in the reference I used and it seems unusual. The Ottomans lost the war and all of the other terms were in Russia's favor. Why would Russia have turned around and made such a major concession? MK2 05:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orthodox Protectorate
Talk:Orpington railway station

message: I'm puzzled how the railway station mentions bridges over the A21 which is several miles away. 
The only bridge by the station is over the A232, and very ugly!
This has been corrected. CarolGray 19:30, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridges 

message: I have used this station a fair amount for over 20 years, If I remember right the station was expanded I think from 5 platforms to 8 at a point in the mid 1990s maybe 1994. Platforms 6, 7 & 8 the dead end platforms are the new platforms I think. The bus station is also a fairly recent addition added at the same time or after, before this there were 3 small stops on the road for the different buses they had no shelters or seats. Does anyone have a better memory than me or can find a source for this. Carlwev (talk) 01:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Station extension
Talk:California sea hare

message: — Assignment last updated by Mars134340 (talk) 10:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Talk:Spinosaurus

message: In 'Aquatic habits" David Hone links to Australian cricketer, not the paleontologist. 82.22.144.191 (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect David Hone 

message: In 'Aquatic habits" it says "Studies of the tail, thanks to fossils recovered and analyzed by Ibrahim, Pierce, Lauder, and Sereno and colleagues in 2018..." but Sereno should not be included in that list. He was not part of that 2018 Morocco expedition (he was preparing for a Niger expedition the same year) or involved in the 2020 tail paper. Thanks! Slbaumgart (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sereno not part of 2018 Morocco expedition
Talk:Mud dauber

message: In Oklahoma we have quite a few mud daubers that are red or brownish-red. Are these a separate sub species?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.26.176 (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Mud Daubers

message: First sentence states "the latter two species above"
There are only two species mentioned above. Somebody with some knowledge about the subspecies please fix this. 2602:306:30D1:25D0:15D5:ABC5:6EBF:29C4 (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview 

message: I propose to merge Spheciformes into Mud dauber. I think that the content in the Spheciformes article can easily be explained in the context of Mud dauber, and the Mud dauber article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Spheciformes will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. MiXT4PE (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the German and Norwegian Wikidata links, as discussed. Klbrain (talk) 05:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Phantom Girl

message: Since (for instance) the Ultra Boy article covers both preboot and postboot versions of the character, shouldn't we merge this article with the Apparition article and point Phantom Girl queries to it? Is there such a standard going for Legionnaire articles? Korvac 17:08, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep - where the postboot character did not use the name of their "parent" version - which often also means that, as with Triad, Ferro and Umbra they get a different personality and origin too, and thus aren't the same character in any significant way - they get their own page - SoM 21:20, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With the Threeboot firmly established now as "the" Legion, there are multiple personalities and names to each character. Multiple articles are more confusing at this point. I suggest both of these should be merged into Tinya Wazzo. Rockhopper10r 16:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge this into Phantom Girl. She wasn't Apparition long enough to worry about multiple names necessitating a merge into Tinya Wazzo, a name that is simply not well known. Superman has his own article even though he has been known by names like Nightwing before. Doczilla 17:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparition (comics) Should be merged into Phantom Girl, as that is the proper name for the character and she only needs one entry. Rhindle The Red 19:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Apparition (comics) 

message: In what issue did Phantom Girl first appear? --68.103.154.140 18:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance? 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The structure doesn't follow WP:CMC/X and not only does it need the in-universe material collected under the "Fictional character biography" section but it must have out-of-universe material in a publication history. It is also very thin on references. It can't justify a B and I feel it falls short of a C as it currently stands. (Emperor (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Saturn Girl

message: This article needs pictures. Most of the other Legion characters have them, and she's one of the founders. Redxiv 04:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics 

message: It would be nice if someone could settle on a name for the third Legion continuity and make it consistent throughout all the Legion related pages. I was just browsing through a bunch of character pages and I've seen it referred to as "Threeboot", "2005 Reboot", and "2005 Reimagining". Haven't seen this one yet, but "Post-Infinite Crisis" would probably work to describe the reboot. Or something else, whatever floats your boat :). Dmwc 20:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: I just removed about 75 unecessary tags from the article. Some sentences had three tags in them. The article was impossible to read. Lets keep the tagging to a minimum. Unless there is reason to think that a fact may be disputed, there is no reason to tag it. Too many tags makes the article impossible to read. Thank you and be well --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary tagging
Talk:Eric W. Weisstein

message: About MathWorld, the article states, "It is regarded as an important resource for both professional and student mathematicians."
I regard this with skepticism as I don't know any mathematicians that consider this an important resource for them.  The mathematicians I know prefer to look up their information in standard books in their subject.  --C S (Talk) 05:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that sentence.  Even if I were to have replaced it by saying "...important resource for students", the problem remains that it is only an editor's opinion and doesn't explain by whom "it is regarded...".  Not only that, but I don't really see the point of having this sentence anyway.  --C S (Talk) 02:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link "Weisstein's Commentary on the CRC Press Lawsuit against MathWorld" (in References) seems to be dead. HowiAuckland (talk) 01:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected all of these links. Kevin Carmody (talk) 10:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links 

message: The article states "Among these benefits are the inclusion of a copyright notice of the CRC Press at the bottom of all webpages in MathWorld and legal rights to reproduce MathWorld in book format again."  But a quick check of a couple of MathWorld articles shows the notice "© 1999-2010 Wolfram Research, Inc."  Is the sentence out of date?  Since the copyright notice dates itself all the way back to 1999, was the above statement ever correct? Duoduoduo (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright of MathWorld
Talk:Kunsthistorisches Museum

message: I have started by adding the list of pictures. The list is identical to the German page as of today, with english titels as the museum uses them in their presentation.
--hans 12:21, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following comment was anonymously placed into the article; I've brought it here, since clearly this is talk page stuff, not article stuff.
Note: The painting, "The Procession to Calvary" (Bruguel) appears to be in this museum by the means of internet sources, but when at the museum's website it appears that they DON'T have it.
Based on that, I cut the following from the list in the article, figuring that until this is sorted out an omission would be less of a problem than an incorrect inclusion.
**"The Procession to Calvary" (Kreuztragung Christi), 1564 
Could someone, possibly someone in Vienna or with direct knowledge of the museum, sort this out? Thanks. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:34, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have any particular direct knowledge of the museum, but their website does list the painting in question, from which I assume them to possess it. English / German --Stemonitis 11:06, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Note, this is the 1564 painting by Pieter Brueghel the Elder, not the 1602 painting by Pieter Brueghel the Younger: The Procession to Calvary →   ~:74.60.29.141 (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Procession to Calvary

message: This page also needs renaming, the title can refer to any art history museum. It needs to have " (Vienna)" or ", Vienna" added to the title.
:Which other Kunsthistorisches Museum looms up to confuse the reader? --Wetman 21:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Their site branding is:     ~5 years later...74.60.29.141 (talk) 08:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Template talk:Politics of Hong Kong

message: What's the purpose of that page?  Is that an unfinished revision or something?  I don't think we should be linking to something in a subspace of an article like that.  --- Hong Qi Gong 21:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. Electionworld (prev. :Wilfried) (talk 18:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HK government/temp? 

message: I'm trying out some simplification of the template by reducing the number of lines. Some of it achieved by putting the person after the post.
I have also removed, for example, Rita Fan from under Legco (although she is president - but that is not quite the same as being leader of a political party), and am also contemplating removing Leung Chun Ying from under Exco because I don't really see what his name is doing there. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplification 

message: This template appears to have a significant overlap with . I believe it should be merged to it. I think we only need to bother with the significant parties and the current ones. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: *I think the template should be kept, as in the Chinese Wikipedia, both the "Politics of HK" template and this more detailed "political parties" template exist.  The former is about the full range of HK political issues, while the latter helps give the full picture of Legco's political makeup at a glance.
Misterx2000 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for keeping the template

message: I saw this template placed in a few politician's articles, so I took the liberty to remove it from their pages.  I don't think this template goes very well with a single politician's place, it should only be used in a topic-related article that mentions Hong Kong politics. Tvtr (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing this template placed in politician bios
Talk:Albert Hill (athlete)

message: The Albert Hill who won the VC at Delville Wood in 1916 is definately not the same person as Albert George hill who won two Olympic Gold medals in 1920.
The VC winner lived in Denton Lancashire for a time and worked in a hat factory. He emigrated to America and died in 1972 and is buried in Rhode Island.
Any correspondence would be welcome at joehorsfield57@hotmail.com
:The article on the VC winner is now at Albert Hill VC. -- Arwel 14:14, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles IV, Duke of Lorraine

message: Is this not Charles V, duke of Lorraine rather than Charles IV? --Wetman 13:00, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm terminally confused! Charles V indeed. I did mean CIII vis a vis CIV. --Wetman 13:07, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone help me identify which of the many Charles of Lorraine the image :File:Wenceslas Hollar - Charles of Lorraine.jpg (right) is? Thanks. Dcoetzee 19:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image question
Talk:SAP NetWeaver

message: Guys, I see a lot of ranting here on the form of this page, but no action to change it -How about come to action and do something about it?
Regards,
Benny--155.56.68.220 (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranting, but no action 

message: Any objections to my merging SAP Central Process Scheduling here? It seems pretty non-notable except as a component of NetWeaver itself. Dai Pritchard (talk) 18:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAP Central Process Scheduling
Talk:Inman Square

message: Someone please cite the info in here. If there's no citation, it must be your original research. If it's your original research, Wikipedia is not the place for it. 18.173.1.42 19:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add Unref tag to article Pnkrockr 16:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: It is my understanding that the official name is David I. Calnan Sq.  The City re-named the square in honor of this local resident who died in Italy during WWII.  There is a Gold Star Mother's plaque at the corner of Cambridge and Springfield St.
173.76.47.165 (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name
Talk:Crack a Smile... and More!

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 20:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:River Colne, Hertfordshire

message: See also Talk:Rivers of Great Britain#River Colne, Hertfordshire which lists four streams still not included in this article. Recent edits have thrown away the info that some of these streams are distributaries, eg. the Colne Brook. What we really need for this complicated river is a map. -- RHaworth 05:10, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC)
:I have added a map. I am not sure about the branch between A4 Colnbrook Bypass and A3113 Airport Way. It appears to disappear under Heathrow Airport. Does anyone know if it is culverted? Bob1960evens (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tributaries

message: Based on Ordnance Survey maps, it does not appear River Colne reaches (or crosses) the boundary of Berkshire, even though it flows close to it. The boundary appears to be to the west of River Wraysbury, which itself is to the west of the Colne (see interactive OS boundary map or the OS Landranger/Explorer maps). Delta 51 (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berkshire
Talk:St. Erkenwald (poem)

message: I've had a go at improving this article. One minor, pedantic point: I think there's a reasonable case to push this one into British spelling conventions, since it's a Middle English poem about English history, which sounds like a pretty clear-cut case of MOS:TIES to me. I've done this in my edits.
I suppose in the fullness of time that might mean the article becomes "St Erkenwald (poem)" rather than "St. Erkenwald (poem)". Uryence (talk) 10:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling conventions

message: A better title might be Erkenwald, bishop of London with the brief facts known of his life (see Barking Abbey), and a fuller treatment of this poem. Context always gives depth. Just a thought. --Wetman 14:42, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Unclear why this article needs lists of words with yogh or thorn—this is not an article on Middle English; we might as well have lists of color terms. It is not germane to the text, so I propose deleting it.--Akhenaten0 (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word List?
Talk:Skidmore, Owings & Merrill

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, today I started a new section under People about Women at SOM that takes advantage of the great new site Pioneering Women in Architecture and added links and cites wherever possible. The page still has a header that some of the content on this page comes off as promotional. Fothergilla (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a Women at SOM section
Talk:Pool

message: I just went through all 600+ search matches for articles with "pool" in their names, and expanded this DAB page to include (what I think of as) the relevant ones.  Probably needs some more sets of eyeballs on it to make sure that it is done suitably. Personally, I think most of the "See also" section could be safely pruned, though I don't think the entries hurt, either.  I would definitely keep the entire "Resource management" section, as anyone coming her looking for that sense of "pool[ing]" will probably be responding to something specific they encountered, like use of the term in reference to banking, or insurance, or whatever, in particular, and finding nothing but the generic article on the concept as a whole may not help them in any way. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 08:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive update 

message: I have added a new Computer Science possible disambiguation. I am not sure whether the very terse description is informative enough (although it probably will be for those most directly interested). Just flagging this in case a more experienced editor wants to take a look. SchipholAirport (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pooling layers 

message: The redirect Pools (song) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pools (song)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]