lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fellah

message: "it was used to distinguish between Arab settlers and the indigenous population of the conqured territories, such as the Egyptians"
:So, which did it refer to? NickelShoe 03:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

message: This entry needs a great deal of work. Currently it focuses only on fellahin in Egypt, although the word refers to peasants throughout the Arabic-speaking world. Those who know, please add info about Fertile Crescent region, other parts of North Africa, etc. LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 23:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: because this word is widely used !! I can't because my English is not good  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.192.238.113 (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please someone Add info about Fellahin  in Maghreb 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.touregypt.net/epeople.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Alfonso Mondelo

message: Hey how you doing coach this is poula Labib I was porn in Egypt and I lived in Egypt for 14 years then I came here to Florida i started playing soccer when I was 6 years old in clubs in egypt and here in Florida and And you can’t play pro in egypt if you are Christian and god give me a chance to come here and work for my dream I work very hard on my self and practice every day to follow my dream and make it happen one day. If you can help me watch my game or see me playing that will be appreciated. 2601:702:8180:5280:3567:EF9C:8D09:BB (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poula
Talk:MaDFroG

message: I think the article should be renamed to Madfrog's real name...
:I have renamed the article. ---Credema 23:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Code Black

message: The article in its current form is a minor bit of pop culture trivia which belongs, if anywhere, in a broader Grey's Anatomy article, such as an episode summary or perhaps an article on GA terminology.   66.167.141.29 04:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article has turned in to a bit a fancruft.  Code Black is an actual emergency code for bomb threats in some locations, see references on the article page, much beyond the scope of Grey's Anatomy.  I refactored and linked portions of the page, and removed the imortance cleanup tag.  This looks like a good stub article now to me. xaosflux Talk/CVU 05:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it looks okay now. 66.167.141.29 07:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I hate to reply to my own comment but after looking at the into again, the first three sentences have no supporting evidence listed in the links and should be removed. Then I would suggest moving the pop culture definition to the main article intro because this is exactly what it is. 24.7.141.159 14:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I concur. Other than the PDF linked to in the first revision of this article -- and that is for a regional hospital -- there is no substantiated evidence for this phrase being other than a fiction created by a television show. At this point the article smacks of (self?-)promotion and original invention. Possible outcomes: mark as fanfic, merge/redirect to Grey's Anatomy... -- Metahacker 01:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic
Talk:Heckler & Koch HK416

message: References regarding the basis for rifles like this should really credit the Colt AR-15 rather than the Armalite AR-15 for a couple of reasons. First, the design Colt purchased from Armalite was significantly different in several ways when compared to the Colt AR-15 that virtually all modern AR-pattern rifles are copying. Realistically, the Armalite AR wasn't a finished design when Colt purchased it, and the Colt AR we have now represents the finished product. For example the redesigned charging handle, modified lower, and the forward Assist Colt added to the design that would become the semi-auto AR-15 as we know it are found on virtually all modern AR-pattern rifles, including those made by the new, and unrelated to the original, Armalite. The only companies that I know of which source their design from the unfinished Armalite rifle Colt purchased are an out of production weapon built in the Philippines and a handful of retro Armalite models built in small numbers as collector pieces. We don't typically credit the Colt Model 1910 when we reference where the vast majority of modern semi-automatic pistols borrowed sourced their Browning tilting-barrel design from, we reference the finished 1911 design, and for the same reasons. Syr74 (talk) 01:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it now: diff. I believe I had incorrectly disambiguated it to ArmaLite AR-15; it's now pointing to generic AR-15. Please feel free to adjust further. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colt vs Armalite as a Reference 

message: It seems to me that using the "AR-15 style" is a misnomer, since this was designed for military, based on military rifles and not civilian rifles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.45.115.15 (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  AR-15 Based or M-16 based? 

message: I'm pretty sure the redesigned gas block increased the minimum barrel length to 11.5". It's the shortest length HK shows on their website. Spartan198 (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A5 minimal barrel length 

message: User:Le Petit Chat, I do not think that you can say that the HK416 is the standard rifle of the French armed forces: the Army overwhelmingly uses the Famas-F1 (no the G2), and the Navy the Famas-G2. Furthermore, the Gendarmerie uses HK G36. The HK416 might be envisaged as a future standard, but stating that it is now is incorrect and unsupported by the sources of the article. Rama (talk) 22:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  French forces
Talk:Black Sunday (1960 film)

message: A this is english wikipedia, i believe the english title should take precedence instead of the italian one? but which english title? 82.26.17.115 12:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is to be renamed, which I agree is probably a good idea, it should be changed to Black Sunday (1960 film), as that is the film's most commonly utilized title in various reference books/periodicals/websites. -Hal Raglan 01:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of this article

message: I've re-written this article. A lot of it has stayed in-tact or just expanded upon. The plot is the same, I've removed some reviews which I feel don't really express a lot (I actually found the '"Castle of Frankenstein magazine one, but its just an anonymous article saying its one of the best horror films in recent years, and does not go into details). I've moved around some details and removed unsourced bits and cleaned up the citation. If anyone wants to bring anything back, I don't think it's too bad of an idea, but just maybe format the source up a pinch. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, Andrzejbanas! I've pretty much finished my usual "expansions". Feel free to make any changes or suggestions that you wish - I think it's much closer to our work on Blood and Black Lace and Danger: Diabolik now. PatTheMoron (talk) 02:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work! I've went through it to make sure some of it matches copyright and MOS:FILM edits, but you added a lot of strong work. Thanks for your help! Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

text: That's the issue, as there is no real "one picture" that might properly capture how the image relates to other films as an influence. I was considering have a side-by-side comparison of the pierced face of Asa and the woman in Tim Burton's film, but it's not quite as strong the Blood and Black Lace one, which has been re-done at least three times in film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I've left the writing credits and cinematography credits blank in the infobox per the prose in the article. As research has dictated, it's not clear who wrote the film and the credits very from sources beyond the film credits. If you want to add anything there, please discuss it here first as it does not seem to be clear. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Taxila

message: Dear Sirs, I have been an old user of Wikipedia since a decade, but I have noticed you have been showing part of Jammu and Kashmir (POK) in Pakistan. 
This is a grave mistake pl. Correct the same as it is Pak Occupied Kashmir but have always been an integral part of India. Pak is yet to leave the area but must be shown as one J&K which has been part of India since centuries. Mssamant (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide WP:THIRDPARTY reliable sources that show the kind of map that you prefer? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of India Shown wrong. Jammu and Kashmir Integral part of India shown in Pakistan 

message: "...is an alternate name for the Nāga, a non-Indo-Iranian people of ancient India."
Literally Taksha or Tokkho or Tokkhok means snake. Another word for snake is Naga or Nag. Thus the name would literally mean Snake Rock or Naga Rock supporting the above statement.
However, there may be other translations of taksha or tokkho: imagination; creativity; skill; knowledge; etc. Dokkho or daksha literally means skilled. onushilon.org takho--Novo24 (talk) 04:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: The city was known by the name of Takshashila, Taxila is a Greek pronunciation(?), and was probably used by Greek writers who never visited India. Shouldn't the article bear its actual name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronitd (talk • contribs) 11:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We use the common name in English for articles. You'll need to show that the common English name (in scholarly sources) is Takshashila to make the change. --regentspark (comment) 14:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Taxila? 

message: This sentence is out of context. Muhammad bin Tughluq was the Sultan of Delhi from 1325 to 1351. What is he doing in a section titled: "Indo-Greek"? אביהו (talk) 08:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "After 5 AD, the Muslim ruler Muhamad Tuglak tried to destroy it."
Talk:Gandhāran Buddhist texts

message: one should have added where have they been discovered, this and that... like this, the article is confusing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.43.195.18 (talk) 01:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article clearly states "They are thought to have been found in western Pakistan, the location of Gandhara, buried in ancient monasteries." Dharmalion76 (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

message: as I have only got a limited internet access.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Jq_m9VpoqUkC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=Why+did+Gandharan+buddhists+bury+their+manuscripts&source=bl&ots=chTPZXQe1U&sig=LRYS0ZOrmwKiAjJwagktJMrD0sQ&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result
--202.173.190.40 (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could anyone please add this info to the article... 

message: Just found out about this. Jayarava (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Split' Collection 

message: I'm almost certain this is the material published in the 19th and early 20th centuries by Sergey Oldenburg and Émile Senart, but it'd be nice to have an actual reference. RedPlanetoid (talk) 06:41, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: No source for "Khotan Dharmapada" sub-section
Talk:Dharmaguptaka

message: Dead link was "*The Dharmaguptakas and the Bhikkhuni ordination lineage".  Looks like whole site is dead. Here.it.comes.again (talk) 03:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing dead link from external links section on 27 Aug 2008 

message: it would be good to make a merge of the Pratimoksha of Tibetan Lineage, the Patimokkha of the Theravada Lineage and the Dharmaguptaka Lineage. These three are the present existing Ordination Lineage of the Buddha deriving from his disciples to the present...--Kt66 17:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge of the three Vinaya Lineages
Talk:Brahmi script

message: From what I can see, the Semitic origin of the Brahmi script is the scholarly consensus. Whether it is a direct descendant, or simply inspired, and from which script specifically, does not have such a clear consensus, but the overall Semitic origin does. So, why is it listed as disputed in the infobox of this article as well as of most Brahmic scripts on Wikipedia? Isn't it WP:UNDUE to give that much weight to the fringe and with a clear nationalist agenda hypothesis of indigenous descent of Brahmi? TuxCrafting (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. Unfortunately, there is a whole army of Indian nationalist editors who will likely resist removing the undue weight given to the untenable indigenous origin theory. Metta79 (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

text: I personally think the question marks should be removed, and perhaps only a 'likely' added before Aramaic script (or after in brackets). The consensus among expert epigraphists is that it's primarily an Aramaic derivative. Metta79 (talk) 07:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

text: This article is unreadable because of the paragraphs and paragraphs of meandering, repetitive content that has been added to try to give the impression that there is no consensus and that the indigenous origin theory is just as valid as any other. It would almost be easier to rewrite the entire thing from a clean slate than to try and wade through all this stuff. Linguifauna (talk) 03:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. The article, especially the origins section, sounds laughable to anyone who has actually any real expertise on the matter. The fact is the "indigenous" theory of the origins of Brahmi is nonsense and against the scholarly consensus. Brusquedandelion (talk) 09:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

text: I did some factoring on these notes, not changing their substance because I was not informed enough, but this was my understanding. Remsense诉 10:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

text: I have removed the note in the infobox claiming the Semitic origin is not "universally accepted" (neither is spherical Earth, but it is the academic consensus). Brusquedandelion (talk) 00:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disputed" Semitic origin 

message: I noticed that in the Consonants section of Early Brahmi, ra is listed as /r/ but marked as 'Voiced Retroflex Approximant'. Isn't the latter /ɻ/ not /r/? Username203 (talk) 03:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consfusion on /r/
Talk:The Seer

message: I'm not familiar with the show Charmed, but from what I read, it doesn't appear that The Seer (Charmed) is about an episode of the show. It looks like seers are concepts of the show (a type of character). Q0 04:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I was sloppy when I tried to fix this disambiguation page. Is it better now? Kusma (討論) 05:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Force Shaping

message: Plenty of good information here, but the article needs the following clean-up:
* Convert to a more neutral point of view, appropriate to an encyclopedia.
* Convert from a current events format to a historical format.  (Give years, etc.)
* Add citations/references where appropriate.  The use of citations and the attribution of opinions to these sources may allow the original author to retain more of the discussion of how these CGOs are being harmed, without causing NPOV problems.  (Can you cite a source for the phrase "save money and hurt people"?) 
I also think the article could be strengthened by the inclusion of some more statistics (firings planned and $ saved), if they're available.
- Csari 04:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestions for clean-up/improvement
Talk:Muhammad Shah

message: The article about Muhammad Shah, should have 3 parts.
The first being about the ascendancy to the Throne by Muhammad Shah.
The second being the War against the Marathas.
The third section should be about the invasion by Nader Shah. Fjgdh5 (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections

message: Can someone please upload a portrait of Mohammad Shah? I can't find it online. Anwar 02:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Need more sources. Try googling Roshan Akhtar emperor 1719 1748
Try for example:
* Fall of the Moghul Empire of Hindustan by H. G. Keene, at project gutenberg.
* History by Raghunath Rai, on google book search.
Esowteric (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Muhammad Shah has been called Muhammad Shah Rangilla. This has been mentioned invariably in all the books. I am forgetting the author of book titled Later Mughals (Not the recent one by Darlymple), in which was mentioned that how the emperor had appeared for general audience in the woman's attire and caused embarrassment to other. Such acts on his part had made other to call him Rangilla even during his life time. I was just wondering that such acts obliquely suggest his sex life also and may be he was a gay. Does anyone know about such a reference? Sumir  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumir Sharma (talk • contribs) 12:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rangilla Significance 
Talk:The Art of Breaking

message: Phil X recorded the guitars on the record; I don't think he actually played any himself -- pretty sure Trevor did that. If anybody cares, let me know before I change it. Roofi's Publicist 20:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phil X 

message: Does anyone know who the person on the cover is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcpizzadude (talk • contribs) 15:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Art 

message: this album is not rapcore, this album did a shift to a more mainstream rock style. albums like Set It Off and Phenomenom deserve such labels.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt 14 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rapcore 

message: Why doesn't it say that their is a DVD on the album?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.77.232 (talk) 23:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD
Talk:Frank Eugene Corder

message: No sources, unref tag added. --FloNight 04:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article cites no references, I'll look up who removed it. --Axe27 18:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: The article says his wife died some weeks before the incident, but the linked New York Times article from 1994 says Corder and his wife seperated three weeks before his death. Which is correct? 213.10.46.8 (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Corder's wife?

message: This statement seems like a conspiracy theory to me, or something along those lines.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.7.227 (talk) 00:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Though the White House is rumored to be equipped with surface-to-air missiles, none were fired"

message: The Infobox states that the death was a suicide (i. e. an intentional killing of oneself) but the article itself does not corroborate that. Is the descriptor correct? Eatmorepies (talk) 06:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suicide?
Talk:Narrativity

message: The concept of narrativity is common stock in literary studies. The distinction between the rendering of a story and the public's perception is pretty old. It was thoroughly formulated by Gérard Genette's distinction between récit and histoire in his book Figures III.     --Amador 05:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Narrativity" is not an exclusive concept of film studies
Template talk:Pp-main-page

message: REPLACE ALL INSTANCES OF THIS COPYVIO IMAGE WITH :Image:Lock-icon.png
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cantus (talk • contribs) 05:18, 2006 February 6 (UTC).
::Image:Lock-icon.png now carries the  tag. I suppose it's okay to keep it now. -- PFHLai 14:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icon 

message: ;Please add :Category:Protection templates immediately after the message box like this
:|}<includeonly>
:Category:Protected main page images
:</incudeonly>
:
:
-- Omniplex 02:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --CBDunkerson 02:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add category for protection templates 

message: I want a copy of edit this page contents to start a similar template on Bengali Wikipedia. Please help me. --Tarif from Bangladesh 09:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to edit 

message: Please add:

--Bsherr (talk) 02:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —fetch·comms 02:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD 

message: There is currently a proposal to convert this and other protection templates to Lua at Module talk:Protection banner#Proposal to convert all protection templates to use this module. Please join this discussion over there if you are interested. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to convert this template to Lua
Talk:Not a typewriter

message: As I recall it the usual source of the bogus message was not a "leftover" ENOTTY, but one generated after the real error when stdio determines how to buffer output on the error stream.  For example:
fp = fopen("some/file", "r");  /* fails */
if(!fp) {
  if(!log) log = fopen("logfile", "w"); /* buffering test on open generates ENOTTY */
  fprintf(log, "%s\n", sys_errlist[errno]); /* prints "Not a typewriter" */
}
Modern isatty() implementations take care to restore errno.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.79.118 (talk) 09:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Jamil Al Gashey

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was nothing. This is a merge request, not a move. —Nightstallion (?) 17:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sole proprietorship

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.17.36.30 (talk) 09:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

message: I noticed that the advantages section only contained the advantages of corporations, not proprietorships. Some advantages of proprietorships include single leadership, less legal procedures are required for operation, and the tax rate is generally less (these three advantages apply mostly in the U.S., I do not know about other nations).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.253.190 (talk) 22:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages