lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Guildingia obtecta

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ferrissia neozelanica

message: Is it the same as Ferrissia neozelanicus (Suter, 1905) http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/198829/0 ? --Snek01 (talk) 23:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The IUCN Red List states that there is much uncertainty about the taxonomy of this species. This should be mentioned in this article. There is not much more we can do about this. JoJan (talk) 14:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: They are synonymous. Mentioned in the article. --Snek01 (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms
Talk:Herpetopoma bellum

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Herpetopoma benthicola

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Multihull terms

message: No references required! This is an intermediate page. This page is intended to be used by transclusion only. The actual links provide the references.
:Slamlander (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At Wikipedia, we don't use subpages for transclusion in the main namespace. See Wikipedia:Subpages for more detail. Any content should be added directly to the transcluding article. Pagrashtak 18:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Moytoy of Citico

message: Moytoy is not colonial and should not be classed as such.  He did not recognize or accept British authority over him.  He should not be classed as colonial.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection to categorization in "Tennessee colonial people" 

message: I will, at some point soon, get back to improving articles on Cherokee topics. I will make it to this article and will probably remove or add things as I can source them. I'm not sure I believe half of what is written here. Although there was a French presence in the area I am not sure why the Cherokee of that day would use French words in describing themselves or giving themselves names and the break down of the Cherokee name early in the article is wrong. Very rarely do you see consonants without a vowel behind them unless its an "s" or "h". Sometimes you will have a consonant with no following vowel but in every case, for the written Cherokee, you would add a vowel, most often and "a" or "i". I want to slowly start sourcing as much of this as I can. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 13:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-line sources
Talk:Herpetopoma mariae

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Homalopoma crassicostata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Homalopoma imperforata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Homalopoma nana

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Homalopoma variecostata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jay Glazer

message: Someone should update this to mention that he broke the Favre story.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.46.131 (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tagged for WP:COI per User talk:JoshRosenthal2300#Re: Jay Glazer. Also, feel free to Google "Josh Rosenthal". Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: COI

message: Considering adding a small personal history, mainly consisting of his near fatal experience with double pneumonia.  Will watch talk page for any concerns and if none are raised, will add this section to the wiki.Seola (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal history

message: Dear Jay, 
Thank you for writing your book. I suffer from crippling depression as well and, as you described your journey, you could have been writing about me. I have been able to live a "normal" life despite my illness, and have been blessed by having a wonderful family, however I haven't been able to have a successful marriage, going through two divorces. When my son passed away five years ago my depression became unbearable, and I haven't been able to find any doctor that has understood my issues. Medication has not been an answer, nor discussions, so I just have to go through life fighting this on my own. Thank God I am not suicidal. 
 My faith is a help but not any organized religion, and I have never met a pastor or doctor that seems to be able to relate.
The things that you said on Dr. Phil's show today mirrored my life. The way you described your physical ailments due to the depression was "spot on". I have already ordered your book as I know it will help me.  
I live in Maryland and I wish that I could shake your hand, however L.A. is just a little too far away.  Again, thank you for opening up to the world about your journey. I know it was a tough thing for you to do but it will help so many people. Bless you my friend.
Joy 2601:143:C603:F90:C152:442:7CE2:53D7 (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your Dr. Phil appearance
Talk:Volcano mine system

message: I required information regarding the Volcano mine system for content I was preparing in the page M548 regarding the variant of this vehicle used as a mine dispenser.
The current version of this page, dated 2 February 2021, was tagged with the template 'Refimprove' dating back to September 2014, and furthermore, IMHO was lacking sufficient content and was not particularly well laid out. Also, quite a few of the original URLs to cited sources were invalid.
I have therefore rewritten this article, rearranging the existing and adding new content, obtained from appropriate sources (e.g. US Army technical and field manuals, which are available online (I have a whole stack of them on DVD) via Google Books or from https://www.liberatedmanuals.com/) for which I have cited, and as I believe this article is now sufficiently cited, removed the offending template.
BTW I don't think this article should be considered a stub any more, so I removed 'class=stub' from the use of WPMILHIST template above
Regards,
Blammy1 (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of page, 8 March 2021
Talk:Longleat Safari and Adventure Park

message: Very amused to see the only picture of an animal at the safari park is... a rabbit. A fearsome toothy rabbit, who.... (enter Monty Python mode)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.170.203 (talk) 08:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to see we have a picture of some lions now, but I think the rabbit is still the most ferocious looking Periglio (talk) 09:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture - a rabbit? 

message: Wouldn't this be more consistent with other "UK feature" of similar ilk if it used infobox zoo instead of the pretty vague infobox UK feature (just about anything is a feature)? Don Lammers (talk) 00:24, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: why no loco2? and how was loco3 built before loco1? and loco4.name==loco1.name?
Darcourse (talk) 10:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Loco 2 was rebuilt into Loco 5, Loco 3 arrived at the railway after Loco 1, and when Loco 1 was sold the name was transferred to Loco 4. TurboJUK (talk) 17:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing loco?
Talk:San Pedro, Bagabag

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support, simpler. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 00:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Pontoon boat

message: I have an issue here: Pontoon boats are not the same as Pontoons. In fact, they never actually used pontoons. This article mixes the two.
:Slamlander (talk) 18:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! Slamlander (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Slamlander (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:1989 in the United Kingdom

message: It is extraordinary that the football (soccer) match between Arsenal and Liverpool on 26 May 1989 (which Arsenal won 2-0, with a crucial last-minute second goal, to win the closest-ever Football League championship [on goals scored only - after tying on points and goal difference]) is not mentioned. It is one of the most significant club football matches ever and provided the background for the film 'Fever Pitch'. It ought to merit inclusion on the main 1989 page (it is certainly more significant than the previous day's Stanley Cup) as well as the UK version.
The match is mentioned in the articles 1989 in association football and 1988-89 in English football. Tim! (talk) 19:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ant chalk

message: Why is there such a bashing against the "Ant Chalk"?
It works well, is very controllable and is no more dangerous as the legal
pesticides found in common U.S. stores.
I believe everyone understands that a child could easily mistake "Ant Chalk" for "regular" chalk. Many adults would mistake this chalk for the common blackboard chalk if it were out of it's package also.  If parents would do their job perhaps the children would not get their hands on it.  Be a parent not just someone that has a child.  
Perhaps the negative vibe is due to the lead content in the packaging.
If people would use practical caution and care when handling any chemical container this would not pose a problem.  However, since common sense is not that common anymore government must hold our hands.  As with any pesticide or harmful chemical, always use gloves and dispose of properly. This will help in eliminating the lead and chemical exposure and problem solved. However, that does not seem to warrant such a bashing. 
Maybe it is the chemical composition of the “Ant Chalk” that is so terrible.
After placing the "Ant Chalk" up against many "legal" Ant and Roach killers on the U.S. market today, I found some interesting facts.  The first is that the "legal" pesticides use the same active ingredient as the "Ant Chalk".  In fact "Raid" and many of the common household bug killers use the exact same active chemical.  The second is that the legal pesticides where the active ingredient differs are typically much more toxic to humans and pets.
Many of these are sprayed into the air and consequently inhaled by humans and pets. This is an uncontrollable form of application and increases human exposure to the chemical.  However, the can itself is free of lead and is not dangerous.  When possible use non-toxic pesticides.
Again, I do not understand why such an attack.
Ant Chalk is a chemical that kills.  Use proper care, caution, responsibility, and it can exist within any home.
What is the problem??
:The chalk works about as well as traditional insecticides, which is to say not very well at all. In infestations the chalk would kill a lot of roaches at first and then stop being effective just like the sprays. Plus the chalk tends to come from questionable sources and could be contaminated with other chemicals. Jarwulf (talk) 22:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Off-topic chat
Talk:Divisional general

message: The rank, currently rendered in the article as "divisional general", is better rendered in English as "division general".  The word "division" serves in this context as an adjective modifying "general", as does "divisional", but the "-al" is unnecessary and clumsy.  Nihil novi (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Division General

message: I'd like to propose merge of Division General (Bosnia) - single sentence stub at present which appears to be about the same topic as this article - well, into this article. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of Division General (Bosnia)
Talk:Metgethen massacre

message: While it may well be that the murder of civilians occurred at Metgethen, there appears to be problems with the "eyewitness" account of Capt. Sommer [which is actually NOT an eyewitness account, since Sommer by his own admission wasn't in Metgethen until 4 weeks after the alleged incident], to wit: Sommer states that bruising from "beatings" was clearly visible - extremely unlikely that this would be discernible on corpses left to exposure for 4 weeks; the Germans recaptured Metgethen on February 19, Sommer arrived on February 27 [over a week later], and a large number of civilian corpses were still unburied at that time? This also seems unlikely.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.242.183.107 (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok its old, but remember: It was February in eastern Germany, that means temperatures of below -20 °C. I guess it is no Problem to see even older injuries at deeply frozen bodies. To the other point: There were heavy fightings around. Tens of thouthands were left unburied at all and the soil was deeply frozen. To me it seems not unlikely that this bodies were still unburied some days later.--WerWil (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreliable witness 

message: A suburban village along the Königsberg - Pillau railway line. Located 10.4 km west of Königsberg Hauptbahnhof (Hbf). Metgethen was one terminal station of Königsberger local suburban railway passenger trains. These trains running from / to Königsberg Hbf and Königsberg Nordbahnhof (10.0 km) were usually operated by accumulator powered serie AT railcars to 1944. This info just to locate the village. It was served on Sundays in summer 1939 by 31 passenger trains. Weekdays 38 trains in both directions. Quite busy railway station.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.112.209 (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Metgethen

message: The introduction claims  "was a massacre of 36 German civilians". But the further Text don't know this number. There are 32 and 18 mentioned. How became this the 36? And the citations of Sommer are strangely chosen. His testimony has to be read with doupt, no question about that, but why do you find "twelve women and six children" reliable but his testimony of about 3.000 found bodies (Hermann Sommer: Maschinenschriftliche eidesstattliche Erklärung (15. Februar 1951), in: Bundesarchiv: Vertreibung und Vertreibungsverbrechen. Bonn 1989, S. 146f) including many ukranian forced workers not worth to mention at all? Is that a kind of censorship?--WerWil (talk) 18:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: strange
Talk:Mansi, Myanmar

message: I didn't even seen this type of flag using in kachin state because i am living in this state.
The kachin flag should be like this link.(https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Kachin_State_(FOTW).svg) Pyu140 (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  flag