Talk:French Air and Space Force

message: :Image:Logo-armee-de-lair.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-armee-de-lair.jpg

message: :Image:Logo-armee-de-lair.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-armee-de-lair.jpg

message: A question : looks to me the list of planes is wrong. The Rafale M are operated by the Navy (M stands for Marine). Don't ever tell a pilot or any other serviceman in the French Navy he belongs to the loosy Armée de l'Air...
:Sorry cant find any reference to Rafale M, but I have removed the reference to the Navy order in the aircraft table. MilborneOne (talk) 22:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorting between Armée de l'Air and Aéronavale

message: Would appreciuate seeing photos of early french Aikr Force Aircraft(perhaps from 1909 ) By the way 109 and today marks the 100th anniversary of the Frebch Air Force! Merci' Thank You(Dated PMMon,Spet.1,200921stcent By Dr. Edson Andre' Johnson D.D.ULC "X")ANDREMOI (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would like to see Photos of early French Air Force Planes  

message: Help. I'm new here and i can not edit the page. Can someone with an account edit the logo, as there is a new one since Februaary 2010 (which can be found here : http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/4/4e/Logo_armee_de_l_air.jpg)? Thx in advance!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.16.50.91 (talk) 14:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: France bought 176 Alpha Jets. Why does this article show them as operating 140, while the Alpha Jet entry has the French Air Force down as operating 99 of them?
Which is it? 
Also, what happened to to the others? Can't imagine attrition being that high. Have they eliminated some airframes over the past 20 years due to the end of the Cold War and reduced training needs? Were they cannibalized and scrapped, mothballed in France, or sold to foreign air arms or civilians?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.2.150 (talk) 08:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit of original research using http://www.scramble.nl/milbase.htm gives 152 active, 20 destroyed, 3 in use as instructional airframes and one stored = 176 MilborneOne (talk) 19:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha Jets 

message: I was asked to look at the list of  FAF aircraft by someone who wonders if it's accurate.  I believe that it is, but as with most such entries on wikipedia, there's no indication when the list was compiled.  Would it be possible to make that a standard procedure on wiki from now on?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Btillman (talk • contribs) 14:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How current is the info? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:CHUTEURCPA10.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Mirage2000-5F 1-2 Cigognes.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:SIDM SIRPA Air.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: In this article French Air Force is shorten by ALA. 
They are no proper acronyms in French for designating the Armée de l'aire. ALA sounds uncorrect I suppose the L stands for "L'aire" but in French when making acronyms we never or rarely include "l'". In "Armée de l'Aire" "de" is prior to "l'" ADA would be better than ALA however AA would be the best but it brings more confusion (I suppose AA sounds more like anti-air in english, moreover in an article about air forces).
I think ALA should be erase, not that this point does really matter but as ALA doesn't exist in French FAF(French Air Force) wouldn't be more understandable? And in harmony with the English way of designating military forces (RAF, USAAF,...)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rippuku (talk • contribs) 21:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support ADA. ALA is just mutilating the French language as an acronym. Irondome (talk) 22:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designation of french air force 

message: *A decree dated 26 April 2007 disestablished the regional commands of the French Air Force, organizing at the national level, effective 1 January 2008. Before the secession of French North Africa (AFN) there were five regions. On 14 July 1991, four regions were reduced to three. These three were the Région aérienne Nord Est, HQ Villacoublay, the Région aérienne atlantique, HQ Bordeaux-Mérignac, and the Région aérienne méditerranée HQ Aix-les-Milles. As of 1 July 2000, the three were reduced to two, the Région Aérienne Nord and the Région Aérienne Sud.
Before 2010, there were five organic (specialised) commands:
*CFAC (Commandement de la Force Aérienne de Combat);
*CFAP (Commandement de la Force Aérienne de Projection);
*Air Surveillance, Information and Communication Systems Command (CASSIC = Commandement Air des Systèmes de Surveillance, d'Informations et de Communications);
*CEAA (Commandement des Écoles de l'Armée de l'Air);
*CFCA (Commandement des Fusiliers Commandos de l'Air). Buckshot06 (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 1990s Chain of Command

message: Why do some Air Force articles not have the aircraft listed by category in the infobox? It would be useful to add the aircraft in there. Sl3nderman3006 (talk) 11:40, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on French Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:X37fdHsb-ZQJ:www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/302626/4023685/file/Chiffres%2520cl%25C3%25A9s%2520de%2520la%2520D%25C3%25A9fense%2520-%25202014%2520%28GB%29.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ie with https://web.archive.org/web/20141213014855/http://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/302626/4023685/file/Chiffres%20cl%C3%A9s%20de%20la%20D%C3%A9fense%20-%202014%20(GB).pdf on http://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/302626/4023685/file/Chiffres%20cl%C3%A9s%20de%20la%20D%C3%A9fense%20-%202014%20(GB).pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/400382/6028076/file/Chiffrescle%CC%81s2015GB.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The pioneer French aviators of the Service Aéronautique were the first to form fighter squadrons, the first to amass fighter wings, even a fighter division. None of this is in the present article. A half sentence mention in the lede (unmentioned in the body, incidentally), and that's it. You can't even link from Service Aéronautique in the lede to the article, because their is no Service Aéronautique article.
This is a shameful state of affairs, fellow Military History editors. Could some knowledgeable soul step up to the challenge?Georgejdorner (talk) 03:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not even an article for the Service Aéronautique (this is a redirect to this article) in the French Wikipedia. It appears that you, Mr Dorner, may be the best person to consider doing this, sorry to say.. Do you wish to create at least a stub? Buckshot06 (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  If I had had the necessary materials handy, I would have created an article on the subject. I don't; therefore the call for someone else to do it.Georgejdorner (talk) 16:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did whip up a Service Aéronautique section for this article, though.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge and embarrassing omission