Talk:American crocodile

message: Not sure whether this is a useful redirect or not. At present it results in a loop from crocodile back to itself. I don't want to remove that link, as we do hope to someday have articles on all the living species. Difficult. Andrewa 15:17, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says that this is the only crocodile in the new world, but the article on crocodiles in general lists the Orinoco and Cuban crocodiles, both also in the new world. Surely this must be wrong? (Lars Marius Garshol, 2006-03-06)
::The article's wrong. There are 4 recognized species in the Americas:
  1) American Crocodile (C. acutus)
  2) Morlett's Crocodile (C. morletti)
  3) Cuban Crocodile (C. rhombifer)
  4) Orinoco Crocodile (C. intermedius)
 C. acutus is the only species found naturally in the U.S.A.
(sorry, but I accidentally deleted someone else's incomplete entry when I edited mine and I don't know how to reinstate it.) CFLeon 03:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected. Tjunier 09:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is not "wrong" -  it has a source, which is more than can be said for the assertion above. Why is there a problem recognising that there are different views on the taxonomy, and reflecting this instead of just reverting my edits? jimfbleak 11:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You stated AS FACT there was only one species in the New World- when every other public source in the last several decades claims there's four; there was no mention of ANY controversy. The edit mentions only the Cuban Crocodile as a subspecies, which even the source cited gives it full species rank; and nothing was/is said about C. Morletti or C. intermedius. If you are going to 'go against the grain', at least say that you are doing so- or that "new research has shown that contrary to previous belief ...'. I'm not as up on the current DNA or immunulogical research as I used to be, but The Crocodilian Page (www.crocodilian.com) is probably THE major source on the web and they avocate 4 species; the article doesn't even mention them for a link. CFLeon 20:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Once again, I would have respect for an actual 'controversy' where the scientific opinion differs. This is not a 'controversy', it's a statement which goes against every other public source in the past 80 or so years, and not even saying there's a 'controversy' or giving THEIR source; and the source that they DO give, backs up the established version. Since the administrator is an ornithologist, he probably thinks that there actually is a real difference of mainstream scientific opinion. Uh-uh, nope, no way, Jose. Once again, check out the main source on the web: Crocodilian Online http://www.crocodilian.com/  They list 4 species of Crocodylus in the New World (as given twice above), and there is NO MENTION of ANY current thought to the contrary. No other book available in the US in the last 60 or so years (since before Ditmars in the '40s) even hints at the single species idea. The one source that be found other than this page is a single German reference pertaining to the Cuban Crocdile ONLY. Someone inventing a statement does not a reputable scientific 'controversy' make. CFLeon 21:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only New World Species? 

message: There's a lot I would like to change about this page, but when I go to edit the page, there's an entirely different article there. I want to get rid of this:
"The largest member of the crocodilian family is the salt water crocodile. The salt water crocodile lives only in Australia."
But it isn't there when I try to edit. Same deal with this:
"The American crocodile has an estimated wild population of 2000 in South Florida where it's status has been recently upgraded from endangered to threatened[2], and 10,000 to 20,000 worldwide[citation needed] individuals"
-Misha
216.254.12.114 18:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: This sentence sounds incorrect to me:  "They have a four-chambered heart, like a bird, which is especially efficient at oxygenating their blood."  The heart pumps blood; the lungs oxygenate it.  Since I'm no expert, I'll leave it to someone else to confirm and change this, but it sure sounds wrong to me.
Hidesert 10:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxygenation in the heart?

message: I think that more evidence leans towards no fatalities in the US. Here are the sources I found.
*The source in the article from Wilderness and Environmental Medicine says that there are no documented croc attacks in the US.
*This article from the LA Times states: "In Florida, only one crocodile attack on a human has been documented, and that occurred in 1925, when a 14-footer reared up and seized a Biscayne Bay surveyor after he reportedly fired two bullets into the animal. The surveyor died, but the croc survived and was shipped off to a north Florida tourist attraction to perform under the name Zulu."
*This page sponsored by the Florida Museum of Natural History and IUCN-SSC Crocodilian Group says that there haven't been any fatalities in Florida from American Crocs.
*This book says that there have been no recorded fatalities in the US.
*The St. Petersburg Times says no Floridian has been attacked by a crocodile.
*This book mentions a Biscayne Bay death, but it says 1800s, and the man kicked it instead of shooting it.
*This book says no substantiated attacks on humans, but this is probably in a US context in light of confirmed attacks in Mexico.
From these sources, it seems that the Biscayne Bay fatality is an anecdote, partly because the man has not been mentioned by name, and partly because the lack of corroboration of such a story. bibliomaniac15 00:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for digging into this! I will put in something to the effect of: "...there is an 17th century incident that may have resulted in an attack and fatality, but sources are anecdotal..." StevePrutz (talk) 01:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Is there any official Wikipedia guidelines on when wiki project tags should be put on an article?  It seems kind of strange to have one for almost every country that the American Crocodile lives in.  based on precedent on the Cattle Egret and Leatherback turtle talk pages, I'm gonna remove them.   Michael1115 (talk)
 21:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  geographic wikiproject tags 

message: The lead says, "Despite its proximity to Hispaniola, the American crocodile is not found in Puerto Rico." But there is a picture in the article that has their range in green, and Puerto Rico in green. - Wuffyz 09:45, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed that as was not referenced, inconsistent with the map, and did also not summarise the "Range and distribution" section. --Elekhh (talk) 06:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Although it might be true looking to this map, but still a description of where it is not found does not belong to the lead. However if confirmed than the map needs to be amended. --Elekhh (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puerto Rico 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on American crocodile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://eprint.uq.edu.au/archive/00002011/02/croc.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140911103844/http://www.miamisci.org/ecolinks/everglades/crocinfo.html to http://www.miamisci.org/ecolinks/everglades/crocinfo.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121124001057/http://www.fpl.com/environment/plant/pdf/turkey_point_crocodile_fact_sheet.pdf to http://www.fpl.com/environment/plant/pdf/turkey_point_crocodile_fact_sheet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At one point, the article says that American alligators are often threat to, and are seen killing and eating crocodiles. At another point, it says American crocodiles are often dominant over alligators. At yet another point, it says the two rarely come into contact at all. If there's to be any cohesion in the article, these three stances should be reconciled. Luke Beall (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple contradictions 

message: For this statement "Nonetheless, a single recorded fatality was reported for a small adult American crocodile when a great white shark killed the American crocodile as it was swimming out at sea" what is the book page and exact name of the book please? ===Tony  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.92.18.34 (talk) 02:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  sharks and crocs interactions citations