Talk:List of sharks

message: Although there are many, many well-designed navigation boxes on well-defined topics, quite frankly this is not one of them. As Stan mentions above, there are just way too many sharks to put into one template. What you really need as a replacement for this template is a List of sharks that can be grouped, annotated, illustrated, etc., and then you can add a link to the list of sharks under the "See also" section" of each shark article. BlankVerse ∅ 15:36, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to the TFD nomination 

message: *This template was listed on templates for deletion, but there was no consensus to delete. See the log. (archive entry) Courtland 01:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD result 

message: This template have not been deleted but removed from all articles by Gdr. The template is a navigational template, it have been discussed before and now GDR thinks there is a consensus since one user was agains and one for removal adding his agains that was a consensus, so he used his bot to remove (not delete) it. See discussion at Template talk:Sharks. I have stated my point there as has he, or stan opinion that GDR agrees with. I can not start a edit war with a admin with a bot so I found this place and though this was a good place to discuss. Also see my suggestion to add nav links under language links? not sure if possible, probably better than this template but that is not the vote. This vote is either for deletion and not usage of the template or for keeping and adding the template back to the articles where it was removed from. Stefan 13:05, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
*Keep Is good for navigational purposes, much easier to use than category and tax boxes, especially for new users. Stefan 13:05, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
*Delete. This template is currently a very, very partial list of the 350+ total possible sharks. Either it will always be rather incomplete, or it will be H--U--G--E--! Either way, it shouldn't be a navigation template. The template should be converted to a list, which can be grouped, annotated, illustrated, etc., and then a link to the new List of sharks can be added to the "See also" section of each shark article. BlankVerse ∅ 15:47, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template:Sharks]]

message: Most researchers , particularly in Palaeontology circles classify megalodon as Carcharocles megalodon
This species is also known by its fossil vertebae  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.127.227 (talk) 10:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  information on megalodon 

message: The article on the USS_Dentuda_(SS-335) submarine says, "A dentuda is a large shark found in temperate and subtropical waters." I can find no such shark on this list. Can anyone help me in finding out something about this shark? Should it be on this list?  Thanks. HowardMorland (talk) 06:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is that it is Common smooth-hound, see  it can be called 'Musola Dentuda' is Spanish, but I would have expected it to be a more commonly used name if a submarine was named after it. --Stefan talk 11:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dentuda shark 

message: Lanternshark family (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae) Etmopterus lailae ~ See https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170725125618.htm
Please update the list. Kreematismos (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New glow-in-the-dark Lantern shark 

message: I think that a long with the scientific names they should have the regular names aswell 06etc (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change? 

message: I looked up “Nurseblood” and couldn’t find anything. Are you sure it’s a real species?--Inaturlist Lover (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: What Nurseblood?