Talk:History of the Song dynasty

message: *The article clearly passes all of the "quick-fail" criteria.
*Check the picture of Huizong.
*Beyond that, I see no other points of specific interest to be mentioned; the article is very well-referenced and comprehensive.
*For a professional review and refinement of prose, see the League of Copyeditors.
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Once 6c is taken care of, I will complete the review.
Cliff smith 00:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, since the picture tag has been taken care of and all other points have been met, I have decided to pass this article. Cliff smith 01:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome dude, I'm glad it was thought highly of; it's a good article (hence its status, lol).--PericlesofAthens 23:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: As part of GA sweeps, I will be conducting a re-review of this article to ensure that it continues to maintain GA standards. AS the article is very long, I will need several sessions to read through it all. I will be listing potential problems here as I find them. These can be addressed immediately or left until the formal GA review begins once I have finished. If problems remain once the review begins, editors will have seven days to begin making improvements to the article or it may be delisted. If work is progressing then as much time as required will be available. Thanks--Jackyd101 (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have at it! I made some amendments according to your suggestions, but now she's all yours. You've done an excellent job reviewing the article so far; I trust your judgment.--Pericles of AthensTalk 00:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are the exam candidates per year; I just checked Ebrey's source to make sure.--Pericles of AthensTalk 18:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning of GA re-review 

message: *"In the early 11th century, there were some 30,000 men who took the prefectural exams" - is this by year or a total for the whole period?
*"There were also other benefits of Taizu's scholarly, merit-driven system of exam graduates staffed in and maintaining the central, provincial, and local bureaucracies" - such as?
::Those are the exam candidates per year; I just checked Ebrey's source to make sure.--Pericles of AthensTalk 18:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: This article contains a footnote (no. 10) referring to: Hargett (1996), 413.
However, there is no work by Hargett in the references. I assume that this article was used (from Song dynasty, it fits in year and page number):
Could someone please check/correct this.
A big thank you to the author(s) of this article. From the German Wikipedia, --Herr Klugbeisser (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote 10 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion