lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crveni Krst concentration camp

message: Spelling/grammar are atrocious. Citations for facts would be good too! Miken32 04:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling is ok - grammar - so-so. The link given there supports claims in the article. Definitively it was a concentration camp established and run by Nazis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.249.9.199 (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: :Crveni krst concentration camp → Crveni Krst concentration camp —
Capitalization of proper name—Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreasJS (talk • contribs)  17:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization
Talk:West Covina High School

message: Who's maintaining this page for WCHS? -Marco Mayuga —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marco.mayuga (talk • contribs) .
:Like every other wikipedia page, it's maintained by anyone who wants to edit it. "The Encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Arthur (talk) 02:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innocent Query
Talk:CableOne

message: On Cable ONE's official website, they give the name with a space.  Shouldn't the title of this article reflect that? Jeff Silvers 04:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CableOne or Cable ONE? 

message: Should this article be designated as a stub? Xadnder 00:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 
Talk:Sensei (DC Comics)

message: In batman #671 we find out that The Sensei is Ra's father and Ra's doesn't dispute the claim. Will this get added to his profile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.198.18.112 (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ra's Al Ghul's Father 

message: I was under the impression that Sensei was created in Deadman's Strange Adventures original run and only met Batman in much later appearances.  Maybe I am mistaken.  Can someone with the knowledge please emphasize the point? Luis Dantas (talk) 18:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created to fight Batman?
Talk:Qiao Xuan

message: *Qiao Xuan -- I think this is a historical person, but it is totally incoherent.  Is anyone familiar with Chinese History.  Otherwise, it needs deletion. Bodhidharma 00:43, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
*:It's a character from Romance of the Three Kingdoms I think Fornadan 14:29, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Happy Rockefeller

message: I suggest moving this page to "Happy Rockefeller" a la "Pat Nixon" ... Happy, like Pat, was a nickname by which the lady is best known as ...67.142.130.26 21:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Happy

message: The namesake 'Jr.' son has no article, even though the other, younger, son does: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Nelson_A._Rockefeller. Perhaps an article should be created. 71.101.43.4 (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nelson, Jr

message: This article says that Nelson Sr. and Happy were married in early May of 1963. The only data supplied as to Nelson Jr.'s date of birth is "1964". If one digs deep enough one can find out that it was three days prior to the California Republican Primary of 1964, but then when was that? How many links and articles does one have to chase down before one can make the determination as to whether Happy was already knocked up when she and Nelson Sr. married? If Nelson Jr. was born in January of 1964 and the Primary in question was 3 days later, well. This is relevant and encyclopedic information not perhaps for evaluating Happy and Nelson Sr. in absolute moral terms but in researching any possible disconnection between the private conduct of politicans and the public's perception of an asserted code of morality by which they expect their elected officials to abide. The divorce and rapid remarriage of Nelson and Happy had an effect in light of this disconnection. Moreso if she was already pregnant. The birth-date information that would enable someone to surmise that she was, or might have been, or conclusively was not already pregnant when marrying Nelson Sr. should not be withheld. Researchers have a legitimate interest in knowing it.  2604:2000:C6AA:B400:895A:65F2:DC7D:87AB (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nelson, Jr.'s date of birth IS eneyclopedic information and should NOT be withheld by this article

message: Rockefeller tried to buy the painting but Picasso always refused. It hungs in Madrid now. What he owned is the Guernica (or Gernika) tapestry, which was donated to UN. Jorgebox4 (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guernica painting?
Talk:Lunar and Planetary Laboratory

message: Well, it looks like the page is begining to develop rather nicely. What started with my desire to see online somewhere a list of all LPL interplanetary missions has resulted in this wikipedia article. It still has a few more things to complete, but, there's at least a decent outline, far better than was there before. Keep trying to add to the bottom few sections, they still need work. Tuvas 04:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status
Talk:The Jesus Papers

message: I fixed a spelling error.  No content altered.
One would hope that Wikipedia articles dealing with books confine themselves to the straightforward and objective (NPOV) presentation of the book's contents and a bit about the author(s), but it doesn't seem to be the case here. This article is three paragraphs in length, but the second two appear to question the author's motives and cast doubts as to his credibility--they have little if anything to do with the book itself. Even the first paragraph, which appears to be a short abstract of the book's contents, uses the words "conspirational," "pseudohistory" and a misplaced use of the word "alleged"--words which, however unfairly, have a negative connotation.
Can someone summarize briefly the contents of the book? It seems all that was written about was the criticism the book received!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.35.54.66 (talk) 17:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Is there anything to indicate that Baigent's friend who according to Baigent will release them after 25 years (from when?) exists, or what the Pope is supposed to have said about the papers was said? All according to Baigent I suppose. Hugo999 (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baigent's friend
Talk:Joan Wallach Scott

message: Consider changing article name to "Joan Wallach Scott"
I believe that the actor Eli Wallach is her father's brother (ie her uncle) and not her brother.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestorburma (talk • contribs) 00:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments

message: according to her CV. List of Articles is very long, maybee too long? List of published Books might be enough. any opinions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akaiko (talk • contribs) 17:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: Two editors  have tried removing large swaths of information from the research section of this article. I am by no means an expert on the subject but cannot find what they are opposed to (outside of some wording that needs fixing). I am opening a discussion, so that the problem can be exposed and fixed, collaboratively. I am also pinging the writer of most of the content in the section:  for any possible clarification on what was written. Thanks. menaechmi (talk) 15:45, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I have left this page alone for four days. I am going to restore all the material I wrote last year as I explained why I feel it should be in this article, because it is a fact a correct summary of Scott's views, through some beg to disagree. So far, nobody has posted any objections to my remarks. If somebody feels that it does not belong, please join this discussion.--A.S. Brown (talk) 06:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research Section Removal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Youvegotmayell (talk) 06:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Fall 2023 HIST 401
Talk:Coorparoo railway station

message: Though I have never been in Australia I see two things to criticize in this article:
*It is too specific for an encyclopedia article — do we post the routes serving each transit station in the world?
*The areas served by bus routes are often changed, thus maintenance of the article becomes too tedious for an encyclopedia. Too Old 04:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Air Bud: Spikes Back

message: There is clearly a parrot in this film. Look at the cover!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.172.24 (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The cockatoo/cockatiel debate does not warrant a neutrality tag.--K10wnsta (talk) 21:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Animal On Cover

message: I incorporated a byline summarizing everything about the plot I could ascertain from the picture and title.  Strangely, even IMDB has no summary for the film's story.  If one of the three or four people who have actually seen this would like to do a proper write-up, your contribution would be welcome.  Oh, and beyond his significance to the plot, please avoid discussion of the parrot.  :-)--K10wnsta (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Air Bud: Golden Receiver

message: Can anyone find a reference to back this up? As someone with only one degree of seperation from the incident, I don't want to put this up myself: The trainer (or a sub-contractor) for this film who worked with the dog "extras" pocketed the money the dog owners were supposed to be given, and even kept the courtesy copies of the movie that were supposed to go to the dog owners. -- Steven Fisher 15:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trainer swindle 

message: I just noticed this particular phrase:
The family at the NFL game at the end shows the Seahawks playing at an outdoor stadium. When this movie was made, they still played at the Kingdome.
But the note never states whether it is specifically a home game (though it would be likely, as the closest teams outside of the Seattle area are these recent Bay Area bottom feeders.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate explanation for trivia note
Talk:RiverCenter for the Performing Arts

message: I don't understand why the, ahem, "wrong" spelling theatre is used by the venues. Is it unusual? Worth commenting on? The RiverCenter website doesn't seem to mention it but is consistent in its usage. I just wondered if it was interesting/encyclopaedic/citeable enough to be mentioned in the article, but as a visitor I wouldn't know. So what do you think? :) DBaK (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Template talk:Welcomeanon-meta

message: Template:Welcomeanon-meta → Template:Welcome-anon –  Welcome-anon is basically broken and serves little purpose because instead of being a stand-alone template, it is (for reasons unknown) a transclusion portal to the meta template which is, except for a clunky parser function (which, on a separate front, should be changed to mimic the code in , identical to the meta template.
What this means is that when you attempt to substitute welcome-anon, instead of substituting the template as intended, the template changes to the other. Another words, when you type , the result is not substitution but a change of the code to . However, because you are no longer in edit mode, what you see is the template's text, and since it is the same, there's nothing to indicate that the template wasn't successfully substituted. The only way you would know it's still transcluding (hasn't successfully substituted) is if you click edit again and, if you're like me, see the new and unsubstituted template link, scratch your head and say, "huh?". 
Thus, the present role of welcome-anon serves no purpose but to confuse and deceive, and taxes resources by requiring two edits where only one should be necessary. More problematically, it also leaves behind an unsubstituted template whenever someone doesn't go back into edit mode and discover the mess. The author of both these templates is no longer active, so it is not possible to inquire why they were produced in this manner. The reason I have proposed the move in the direction I have, is that Welcome-anon appears, by my anecdotal observation, to be used far more often than is the meta template. The preceding text is a duplicate of that posted at Wikipedia:Requested moves--Fuhghettaboutit 05:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Lady Triệu

message: I removed these sentences because of lacking of source (and, in my opinion, it come from a fringe source of some so-called scholars in Vietnam).--Amore Mio (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for over two weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 09:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
===Restore missing RM1===
Note:RM 1 was bumped into an archive by logged-out editor prior to RM2 so not visible during RM2. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move to remove a problematic given name 

message: Note:RM 1 was bumped into an archive by logged-out editor prior to RM2 so not visible during RM2. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Restore missing RM1

message: Why was the folk art of her riding the elephant removed? Did it have copyright issues or something? Asarelah (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened to the picture?
Talk:The Long Hard Road Out Of Hell

message: Many people, fans and non-fans alike, have openly stated that they belive that the events are greatly exagerated, fictional, or plagiarised. from numerous others sources, i.e. Jim Morrison's various biographies, and also John Lennon's. Both men were cited as influences on Manson.
:I could find nothing about this on the internet and have never heard about this before stumbling upon this page. Can some examples be sighted? --PAT or JK 06:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Guest worker program

message: It does matter, as youjust put a link to the Bracero Program in See Also —Preceding unsigned comment added by Synthe (talk • contribs) 
* Isn't Bracero Program the same thing as this article? Wickethewok 05:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apart from the last section, which is brief and relatively uninformative, almost all this article is about the guest worker program in the USA -- with a specific focus on guest workers from Mexico. Suggested solution: create a new article that is about US guest worker programs past and present. Cut and paste all the US specific part of the article to the new article. By leaving the stub shorn of the entire US/Mexico guest worker program specific information, this will encourage thereby contributions on guest worker programs in other countries.220.240.249.253 (talk) 04:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize
Talk:1 Corinthians 14

message: I removed this:
:Speaking in tongues, or glossolalia, the anglicized version of the Greek γλώσσαις λαλειν (loosely translated as: to speak in tongues), is a difficult term to define when one attempts to look past contemporary Pentecostal and charismatic understandings to how the term may have been understood by the members of the Christ association in Corinth. 
:By way of explaining the terms here, Christ association will first be examined, and then glossolalia. Instead of employing the term of Christians to refer to those who were in Corinth, interested in the figure of Christ, Christ association is used to provide a more thoughtful description of these people. Firstly, Christ is used instead of any reference to Jesus, because Paul in this letter does not appear to be all that concerned with Jesus, the man (1 Cor 2.2). Instead, Paul's focus is upon the resurrection of Christ. Secondly, the term association is used in agreement with Richard S. Ascough's understanding of this term as helping "scholars understand the ways in which the churches were situated within Roman society; the ways in which they offered benefits, both religious and social, to members; and the way members of the group related to one another and to 'outsiders,' both on an individual as well as an institutional level" (Richard S. Ascough, What Are They Saying About the Formation of Pauline Churches [New York: Paulist Press, 1998], p. 88.)
:(To be continued ...)
The second paragraph looks ok, except the words "Christ" nor "association" are not found in any version of 1 Corinthians 14 that I have read. Is this information relevant to this article? The other sentence about speaking in tongues sounds like a topic sentence to more information. However that information is not given here. On top of that, we have an article specifically devoted to glossolalia. Which means, new content should go in that article, and we should summarize that content here if deemed appropriate. We do not need to repeat information, just summarize, and we definately don't need conflicting information (for example, if someone came here and read something about speaking in tongues that isn't found on the main page). Anyway, I hope this explains my removal of this content. Please feel free to ask questions, or address my concerns, and continue contributing to this article. Good luck!-Andrew c 22:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New content from anon
Talk:Hackthissite

message: I'm not sure I understand why this is being classified as a vanity page, it is notable for the following reasons, among other things:
-- HackThisSite is one of the biggest communities in the "hacker world"
-- HackThisSite is an important resource for people who would like to learn
I would also like to note that contrary to being "vain" this article also lists criticism of the community.
I do not mean to be rude, I am simply curious as to why you believe this article should be deleted. 
--EJFox 05:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity Page?
Talk:Unite Union

message: While I created the redirect, it is only temporary until an article can be written on Unite.  Then please add it to :Category:New Zealand trade unions. --Midnighttonight 05:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was noticing that the article on the Australian kin, currently at Unite Union (Australia), has some issues with finding the right topic name and title.  And I infer here that the topic name is actually "Unite", not "Unite Union", implying that Unite (union) would be more fitting, although Unite (union, New Zealand) would probably be necessary given the other Unite union. ENeville 23:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title/Name 
Talk:Bigg Mixx

message: What cereals were included in Bigg Mixx?
: I liked it. If I remember correctly it had Corn Flakes, Rice Krispies, and Special K and maybe something else.  It was very, very similar in concept to the now defunct Just Right and the current - and very popular - Honey Bunches of Oats, which is a mixture of Post products with some extra ingredients. Sharpvisuals (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ingredients

message: It seems tha the prose of the article and the depicted branding show the name of the product as "BiGG MiXX", not "Bigg Mixx". There is currently a redirect from the "OFFiCiAL" spelling, but should not the article reside at the official spelling and the redirect be from here ("Initial Case")? ./zro (⠠⠵) 02:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The scan of the box cover is of sufficient resolution to show that the name of the cereal is "Bigg Mixx" -- it appears to be just a font choice that shows the capitals. The article should probably be updated to agree.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization and Title
Talk:Lesbian Sex Mafia

message: This article is just getting started, now has some information, and is soon to be expanded.  So don't get rid of it quite yet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DuckFerret (talk • contribs) 
:We certainly won't: I've formatted it a bit, and added some category tags: thank you for your contribution! -- The Anome 07:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now, it desperately needs third party sources... and it has been around for over a 18 months now.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 00:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: just getting started

message: Please start adding some sources. As this group has been around a while may i suggest google books? here is a link with a few dozen books that may help. Benjiboi 16:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I turned up to fix a copy and paste tag - but found the article generally lacking - I've added a notability tag but would like opinions on regarding if this article should exist at all?
Pflat (talk) 12:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete? 

message: thanks for expanding this article. I've tagged your contributions as containing errors that you can help address, however. Specifically, you introduced new content without providing citations. Content on Wikipedia must be supported with citations to reliable sources for verifiability. Please add citations to the article to fix this issue. Thanks, Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: feedback for students
Template talk:Signpost-textonly

message: Moved to Template:Signpost-textonly/doc. PorkchopGMX 14:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation 

message: :Moved to larger forum. — xaosflux Talk 14:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 20 June 2018
Talk:Heresiology

message: OK, right now this is basically a dicdef, but I think some substantial content from Heresy could be moved here. I'll leave this to the theologically learned, though. Sandstein 06:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merger? 

message: I understand that, but if we are going to use a rare word (one that doesn't appear in most dictionaries) within the article, and said word is going to redirect to the article, shouldn't we define it in the article? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't see the -graphy variant redirected here. I'll restore the mention.  Sandstein  13:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  If this is not about -graphy...
Talk:Pressure flaking

message: I think the details included here are great, but the article is bogged down by a lot of technical jargon that I don't think most people understand, I'd like to simplify or at least add a simplified section to this article. However, I would like the author to comment on this before I go ahead. ZenTrowel 5/21/06
Sure, merge it. Stormwriter 12/29/06
merger complete -- Oaxaca dan 14:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled