lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National Republican Party

message: :The National Republican Party . . . is being revived today.
:Today the party is getting re-organized and supports a fascist controlled government.
Can anyone cite sources for either of these statements?  Zero Google hits -- results are either about the present day RNC, or this article (and its mirrors).  I am highly suspicious about this edit -- see WP:VIP#198.81.26.42. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 20:44, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed content 

message: One thing I haven't worked out in my mind is if Adams-Clay Republicans should be grouped with Democratic-Republicans or National Republicans........Most of the rosters here show Adams-Clay as National Republicans, but outside sources show the election of 1824 shows the Democratic-Republican group (of which Adams-Clay was around then)as the only viable party at this time? Any thoughts?Pmeleski 22:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adams-Clay Republican 

message: I’m soo concerned that 1/2 of this country’s women are for killing children.. they even support the 9 month abortions.. this is evil!!! 2601:82:C202:F160:E46A:99C6:7FF7:6ED2 (talk) 04:52, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abortion .. even the 9 mo abortions… awful
Talk:Charlie

message: Maybe add Charlie Brown? 24.23.238.168 00:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brown 

message: Where's Charlie the Unicorn? 74.249.96.20 (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicorn 

message: Charlie Hebdo should be added, since many people are calling it "Charlie" (and "Hebdo" means "Weekly") such as with Je suis Charlie using just "Charlie" -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 02:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Charlie Hebdo

message: I would say this list should only include (fictional and real) people that are known (almost) exclusively by the mononym "Charlie" - for example Charlie Bucket belongs in Charlie (given name).  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Mononym

message: Charlie moon is on discord Charlie Moon #0666 92.30.126.210 (talk) 15:11, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie moon 

message: Hello, . Is there any specific reason why 777 Charlie has been removed? -- Ab207 (talk) 13:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 777 Charlie is only a partial title match. It is not known as 777 on its own. See the section WP:PARTIAL as part of the guidelines on disambiguation pages. Tassedethe (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apologies for a late reply. The film's not known as 777 but it is simply referred as Charlie (the disambiguated term) in "sufficiently generic context," therefore merits an inclusion. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  777 Charlie
Talk:Arms and the Man

message: At the moment some of the entries under "Adaptations" seem to refer to the operetta while others to Shaw's original play. This seems to be worth sorting out. I have given up editing the musical/operetta articles I originally joined Wikipedia for (viz my Wiki-name) due to growing unpleasantness or I'd have a shot at it myself. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 02:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific heading for "Chocolate Soldier" operetta?  
Talk:Monte Generoso railway

message: The de.wikipedia article on this line says it uses the Strub rack system, whilst Hugh Dougherty's magazine article (see Sources) says it uses the Abt system. On the totally arbitrary grounds that I read Hugh Dougherty before I wrote this article and de.wikipedia afterwards, I'm leaving this article saying Abt. Anybody know for sure?. -- Chris j wood 21:10, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rack system 
Talk:Needham, Massachusetts

message: There is apparent controversy over the status of Needham High's football rivalry with Wellesley High.  Many Needhamites (myself included) grew up being told it was the oldest in the nation.  The article at http://www.wellesleyhsoc.com/playball6.htm subscribes to this view, and it can be found elsewhere in print.  
However, according to the NFL (http://www.nflhs.com/news/records/11man_team_misc.asp), the Connecticut rivalry between New London and Norwich Free Academy is actually 7 years older.
Oldest Current Rivalries
1875      New London, CT vs.
	 Norwich Free Academy, CT (143 games)
1882      Wellesley, MA vs. 
	 Needham Heights Needham, MA (117 games)
1887      Boston Latin, MA vs. 
	 Boston English, MA (118 games)
1887      Philadelphia William Penn Charter, PA vs.
	 Fort Washington Germantown Academy, PA (118 games)
1887      Pottstown The Hill School, PA vs.
	 Lawrenceville, NJ (101 games)
Is this the definitive answer (ignoring the spurious "Needham Heights" in their table)?
I'm from Needham! Go rockets! Down with Bulldogs!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.4.103 (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranking the Wellesley/Needham football rivalry

message: What does "Needham Heights" refer to?  Is it a subset of the town? -- Beland 16:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needham Heights 

message: This is where the dreams of Needham are made. I love the fields of dreams because I feel like I'm dreaming when I go on the Fields of Dreams.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.239.161 (talk) 23:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needham Field of Dreams 

message: The current page says Randy Moss is from Needham, but I don't think that's true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.105.239.35 (talk) 06:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Moss 

message: John Akers, Needham High School grad, is a past CEO of IBM 165.140.66.119 (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Notable to Business List
Talk:Client state

message: Added to page so it isn't just about the specific example of 20th century client states. --Masamax 22:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 

message: * Special:Diff/1018599511 — Denmark is a "client state" of the United States because an LA Times headline uses the hyperbolic "51st state" to describe some celebrations in a park.
* Special:Diff/1030215131 — Romania is a "client state" because an unidentified person once said so on a personal WordPress 'blog.
* Special:Diff/1030643997 — France is a "client state" because an expert in social media says so, Norway because of an attention-seeking rant by someone on a book-promotion tour.
* Special:Diff/1031254739 — India is a "client state" because of an opinion piece by an Indian politician.
* Special:Diff/1037669004 — Southern Sudan is a "client state" because of an article that says no such thing and instead discusses the forces behind it becoming an independent state.
* Special:Diff/1040558670 — The United Kingdom is a "client state" because someone suggests that it ought to be, and because a politician hyperbolically says to do stuff in order to avoid becoming a 51st state.
* Special:Diff/1045731655 — Australia is a "client state" because of name-calling hyperbole from politicians, rather than any sort of expert, or even inexpert, analysis.
* Special:Diff/1045732520 — The United Kingdom is a "client state" because Julian Assange's mother says so.
* Special:Diff/1046033922 — Australia is a "client state" because of an opinion piece in The Age.
And there's much more where those came from.
It accounted for almost two-thirds of the total size of the article at one point.
This is complete nonsense, hugely misinforming readers, and crass and thought-free writing based upon conflation, phrase matching instead of reading, opinion as fact, twisting of sources, and outright bad sources.
You want people with good reputations doing proper expert analysis, not people calling names to get attention to their political parties, sons, and book sales.
And stop hiding behind the passive voice with "has been described as".
Uncle G (talk) 03:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  An utter pile of drivel and bad writing by multiple editors 

message: I was shocked to read this topic as it contains no evidence for many of the cases being listed, the current version seems more similar to an opinion forum rather than a serious information platform, and the definition of a “client state” which shown in this page is flawed and equivocal. I expect more action to be done with the development of page, or I will just propose a deletion of the topic if no one is going to make any improvement over the impartiality or verification of the referring sources before this month. LVTW2 (talk) 05:09, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The contents in this article are full of subjective opinions with no reference
Talk:Ostheim

message: ﻿I believe Ostheim wasn't technically annexed by Bavaria in 1945 as is sometimes reported.  At least prior to reunification, it was part of Thuringia but “administered by the Free State of Bavaria”.  This was a strange situation since in order to reunify Germany the old states of eastern Germany had to reconstitute themselves in order to join the Bundes Republik Deutschland (West
Germany) state by state.  In other words between around 1952 and 1990 just prior to formal reunification, I don’t think there was a Thuringia existing in the DDR to which Ostheim could be a part of.  
A military history confirmed it being an enclave that was a potential hot spot with Soviets in 1952.  I also read it was the only enclave of Thuringia in Bayern.--CSvBibra 05:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: dialogue

message: Historically Ostheim was part of Saxe-WEimar-Eisenach and Thuringia and came later to Bavaria, but it was and is part of Franconia. Both North-Bavaria and South-Thuringia are franconian. In Ostheim they speak east franconian dialect and have franconian culture. So before 1945 there was a administrative border and also  another diocese and established regional church, but not more. In 1945 there were some areas in Germany which came to another occupation zone because the allies didn't want exclaves or areas with complicated borders. Sometimes they changed landed to get a clear border line.ManfredV (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  cultural identity
Talk:List of swimmers

message: Where did you get the stat for most participated sport in the world?  I would think that at least soccer would be greater.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Honavery (talk • contribs) 23:27, 8 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The unsourced and notability tags have been removed. The one claim in the lead paragraph is now sourced. Each swimmer should have an article, or at least a section of an article devoted to them.  Each article must establish the notability of its subject with WP:RS reliable sources. --Lexein (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a tag re need for further sourcing; pls see below.  The article has a number of redlinked names, bereft of RS refs.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources & notability 

message: If it is the list of swimmers by countries which they have represented, shouldn't the list also include former countries? Flying Saucer (talk) 07:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Former countries
Talk:West Side Highway

message: There seems to be some confusion about the collapse date. Online sources including nycroads.com say it was December 16, 1973, but the NY Times article from December 16 begins, "A section of the West Side Highway collapsed yesterday...". Also, the December 17 article says "the collapse of a portion of the northbound section near Little West 12th Street on Satruday." The 15th was a Saturday. --SPUI (talk) 22:56, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go with the Times, thats more reliable than Mr. Anderson -JGCarter
the bridged section at Canal Street is worth mentioning as a way to cross the filled in outlet of former Lispenard Meadows, which could not support the highway's piers. --Wetman 07:24, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: You seem to know more about that than I do; if you don't mind, can you add that? --SPUI (talk) 08:35, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The template  in this article's infobox shows a map of the world. The "Route map" at the top of the page shows a proper map of Lower Manhattan, with the highway highlighted, so I assume the KML file is correct. What went wrong? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:52, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox maplink
Talk:Amduscia

message: This article refers to WP:COI but fails to identify any e.g. WP:NPOV violations... WP:WHYCOI? -- samj inout 17:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the COI tag, as no reason has been given as to why it should be there - Alltat (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why COI? 

message: In the article there was a reference to Amduscia's music being associated with gothic rock. This is completely wrong, once again ignorant people mistakenly associating real goth music with music that falls into the cybergoth scene. Just because a group wears black lipstick and has a mohawk doesn't mean they play goth rock or are remotely associated with the real goth scene. Get your facts straight people.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.221.31 (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed reference to goth rock
Talk:Ted (airline)

message: do you think the origin of the name came from the last three letters of United? That's my theory. Kingturtle 19:06, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Name origin

message: There's nothing in the Low cost carrier article which would exclude Ted from :Category:Low-cost carriers, nor any industry or regulatory designation I'm aware of which defines what does and does not constitute an LCC and by which Ted is to be excluded. It's not easyJet, but it's quite LCC-like for an airline like United. Certainly UAL considers it their LCC: United and UAL repeatedly refer to Ted as the company's "low-fare offering" and as "United's low-fare service" in press releases, Tilton's speeches refer to "United’s low-fare leisure brand" and "our new low-fare carrier," and United's annual report calls it "Ted, a low-fare service" and states definitively "The introduction of Ted by United in early 2004 was designed to provide United with a lower-cost operation..." -choster 20:22, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than fancy language from the airline, can you point out any distinctions which makes Ted low-cost? An airline purporting to be low-cost does not make a low-cost carrier. I think it is fair to say that one should expect to see some characteristic traits of a LCC in an airline before they can be considered low-cost. Are they doing anything to lower their cost base, which is ultimately where the distinction lies? T0m 09:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it has only one class of service, flies one type of aircraft, never had meal service (when mainline United did), and sells only six fare classes (compared to more than twice as many on mainline and p.s.). (In)famously you can't even get a full can of soda. In terms of CASM it's impossible to say authoritatively because it does not report separate financials (as with Song). In the absence of a stricter LCC definition from IATA, ICAO, FAA, etc., it can't be excluded. News articles, even in the business press, refer to Ted as a discount or low-cost service, so it's reasonable to presume the average user expects to find it there (unlike, for instance US Airways). choster 16:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Low-cost carrier

message: Okay the information here is somewhat premature. Ted isn't technically dead yet only the advertising is going down for the brand name. Also alot of the terms previously edited by Inetpup is a bit harsh, Ted isn't being killed, it's being "discontinued", or "removed". Also, you can't say it "will have been", because who knows, what if all of a sudden fuel prices go down so drastically, and the economy improves and United decides to bring back Ted, and keep the 100 planes? Who knows? Anything can happen, so you can't predict this stuff.SFOetthekid (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably worth just continuing the discussion at Talk:United Airlines#"Premature death" of TED for sake of consolidating the conversation. --Matt (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Ted...
Talk:Removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act/Archive 1

message: Does it look better to have the inline quotes (e.g. in the "arguments against rescheduling" section) be italicized? Hmm, that's what they did at pet skunk, so I'll try it here. Rad Racer 13:06, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inline quotes

message: Should the page be moved? Parleyvous 16:34, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hearing no objections, I moved the page. Parleyvous 18:11, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would've been nice to keep the original page as a redirect, though. Thc420 04:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Petition to reschedule cannabis]] -> [[cannabis rescheduling]]?

message: Sometimes there was conflicting info about dates that judgments were handed down, etc. Part of that may be the discrepancy between when a judgment is made, and when the full opinion is released. I have put footnotes where possible. Parleyvous 16:40, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: The scope of this article is limited to the USA. As it is stuffed full of material with a geographical bias, it should be renamed, and linked to an article that deals more comprehensively with the legislative programmes of different legislations. Gareth Hughes 18:22, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the convention? Cannabis rescheduling (U.S.)? Cannabis rescheduling (United States)? Cannabis rescheduling in the United States? Rad Racer 19:06, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the template, as I think the new title defines the scope of the article. Gareth Hughes 14:00, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited geographical bias 

message: ===Cannabis rescheduling===
Interesting piece, that I would like to revise so it can become a Featured Article. Thc420 07:17, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review (for future ref)

message: Interesting piece, that I would like to revise so it can become a Featured Article. Thc420 07:17, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cannabis rescheduling]]

message: See Cannabis rescheduling in the United States/Picture options Rad Racer 23:31, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Option 3 looks best.  ALKIVAR™ 04:43, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A change of pic could be requested.. Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2005 Rad Racer 20:12, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible lead pics
Talk:TED

message: I have moved the page describing the airline and will start an article about the word processor. Samboy 21:16, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, all fixed now. I tweaked this page to be in canonical disambig format. Someone needs to be sure that all the pages that link here get updated to link to Ted (airline) instead. Noel (talk) 23:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have updated all of the pages that link to Ted to link to the airline (or the soap opera character) Samboy 20:14, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Does anyone type Ted or TED into the wikipedia engine looking for the tunnel?  What about teddy boy?  Or teddy bear?  Do people search for these using Ted or TED?  Somehow I doubt it. Tedernst 07:45, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Many of the entries on this list should be checked for relevance and/or notability. If QCF Ted doesn't merit his own article, should he be on this list?Zorblek (talk) 07:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: tunnel
Talk:FC Dynamo Kyiv

message: Oleg Blohin - Andriy Shevchenko
Igor Belanov - Vladimir Muntyan - Leonid Buryak - Vladimir Bessonov
Anatoliy Demyanenko - Anatoliy Konkov - Oleh Kuznetsov - Oleh Luzhny
Yevgeniy Rudakov  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunderland against Di Canio (talk • contribs) 01:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynamo Kiev all-time team 

message: There is nothing about Maslov's victories, nothing about Lobanovsky.. No Blokhin, no Buryak... Shevchenko is mentioned in passing as is Rebrov-player... What is this?
47.17.208.88 (talk) 02:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is all the glorious history? 

message: Uh, so, just came passing through here randomly, and I gotta say, the part of the history chapter called "Invasion of Czechoslovakia and big politics in football" is... I mean, I don't know if the writer has a loose grasp of English grammar, if it's some kind of auto-translation word by word, or if someone has tried to translate part of the Ukrainian article verbatim, but the grammar is all weird, the word choices are odd, and I... Something is badly wrong with that entire section.
I mean, it's honestly a slightly weird section to spend this much time on in this article anyway, but I'll let that slide if it at least was written properly. I cannot fix it because I can neither read Ukrainian, nor do I have enough knowledge of Dynamo Kyiv history; nor do I feel able to decipher what's gone wrong here. But something's not right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.249.104.34 (talk) 09:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Invasion of Czechoslovakia and big politics in football" section seems horribly mistranslated somehow
Talk:Norwegian Lundehund

message: Removed latest huge chunk of text taken from:
thebreedsofdogs.com; removed as possible copyright violation. If someone can confirm that the copyright holder agrees to the use of this text, we can put it back.  Elf | Talk 23:58, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: If an animal this unusual had been discovered by 19th Century naturalists in the jungles of the Congo or Borneo it would have become widely known and everything would have been done to preserve it. Instead-no doubt because of its origin in boringly non-exotic   Norway-it was ignored and almost allowed to become extinct. Especially tragic is that all members of the breed now carry the trait for potentially severe and lethal disease due to unavoidable inbreeding. Falange (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoological Travesty/Tragedy
Talk:Privity of contract

message: analyse the extent to which landlord and tenant (covenants) act 1995 has overcome the problemsof privity of contract.
Richardcavell 01:30, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Privity of contract 14.139.58.50 (talk) 10:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privity of contract
Talk:Brampton Battalion

message: I question the encyclopedic value of going into detail about a cartoon episode in relation to the marketing goals of the team. Flibirigit 05:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marketing

message: This page seems to be very extensive with information without any references. Any help on this?
I also fixed the broken format for the only "reference" in the article but it points to nowhere.
B2project (talk) 10:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No References 

message: Posted today: http://baytoday.ca/content/sports/details.asp?c=49505  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.25.171.124 (talk) 00:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving to North Bay, ON for 2013-2014 season 
Talk:Mary Dixon Kies

message: :Try inventing something. —Chowbok 04:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hey, I like some of the points you made in this article. However, I think it could use a little bit more work. I would recommend at least adding a picture of Mary if there is one available. Also, maybe breaking down the sections just a little bit more with her personal life and then her work life as a weaver. But i did like that you added that others had tried to improve hat-making. K.ebersole (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: ''' i want to become an inventor but i have no idea where to start''' 

message: Hi, I was tagged by a friend who is a prodigious Wikipedian to help make this article a bit better. Before I do that -- likely starting with the suggestions from the last comment above -- I wanted to check and see if there were any disputes I should be aware of. Looking here, it seems like this has mostly been a quiet page. Joebeone (Talk) 18:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoping to improve this article 