lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hotchkiss M1909 Benét–Mercié machine gun

message: Sadly, the photograph that accompanies this article shows not the M1909 but the M1922. Hengistmate (talk) 17:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification problem. 

message: It is spelt correctly. The acute accent is redundant - in French it would be pronounced the same with or without it, but it's there. "Benét" appears on his various patents. He includes the accent in his signature. It appears on his tombstone. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US538227.pdf  Hengistmate (talk) 23:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benét's name.
Talk:Chicken Bryan

message: I strongly believe Chicken Bryan deserves a page.  It is a common menu item at a restaurant.  If chicken bryan does not deserve a page, then neither should similar pages such as Big Mac or Whopper Ben1283 20:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It reads like an advertisement and is not from a neutral point of view. Why not add this info into the main article for the restaurant?--Mars2035 20:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I think a merge is appropriate Scooter3230 20:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I would agree... except that this information alreadt exists on the page to which we're proposing it merge. Wysdom 20:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, that's good, now we can just delete the article without worrying about merging it. I've listed it in the articles for deletion page.--Mars2035 20:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not delete this

message: You've not met any of the criteria for a Wiki article and you've recreated a page that was deleted at least once before already. AND this article is a precise duplicate of Chicken Bryan in the  Carrabbas article. Please, please read []... there are a few things you need to satisfy other than "it exists" before a subject merits a WIki entry. Wysdom 20:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I strongly disagree
Talk:Ventilator-associated pneumonia

message: JAMA has a nice article on the criteria/principles for diagnosis. JFW | T@lk 20:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On going work 

message: === Overall article ===
Suggestions for future improvements:
#Replace patient with "person with VAP," "person suspected of having VAP," etc.--Plm234 (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review UCSF WP elective 2014 

message: Suggestions for future improvements:
#Replace patient with "person with VAP," "person suspected of having VAP," etc.--Plm234 (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall article 

message: Suggestions for future improvements:
#I look at the lead as a brief summary of the entire article written in the simplest of language. For this reason, I think that adding a little content from each of the main article sections would help to give readers a brief overview of the topic. It would certainly help medical students if they had to quickly read up on the topic before rounds!!
#Simplify language, e.g. "morbidity and mortality"-->increased illness, side effects, and death. "Pneumonia"-->infection of the lungs. "Critically ill"-->extremely sick, etc
#Shorten length of sentences to easy with translation into other languages
A working version with simplified language might look something like this:
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a type of lung infection that occurs in people who are on breathing machines in hospitals. As such, VAP typically affects critically ill persons that are in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).[1] VAP is a major source of increased illness, and death. Persons with VAP have increased the lengths of ICU hospitalization and have up to a 20-30% death rate.[2] The diagnoses of VAP varies among hospitals and providers but usually requires a new area of infection in the lungs on chest x-ray plus two or more other factors. These factors include fever of >38.3 °C, a white blood cell count of >12 × 109/ml, purulent secretions from the airways in the lung, and/or reduction in gas exchange.[1][3]--Plm234 (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: I like that Ktteli added this section. A very important topic and a great start. I would suggest the following area for future improvement:
#Shortening the length of some of the longer sentences
#Including information of the effect size of particular risk factors, i.e. how more are people at risk from different risk factors.--Plm234 (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Risk factors 

message: doi:10.1093/cid/ciu740 - selective decontamination reduces mortality, but nothing much else does. JFW | T@lk 15:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematic review & meta-analysis
Talk:Robert Mark

message: there is another Robert Mark. a designer in NYC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.198.135 (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Who doesn't appear to be notable enough to have an article, but if he does, we can deal with that when it arises. Rodhullandemu 22:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Simply because nobody has yet created one! Wikipedia only contains things its editors have written about. If you want to create one, feel free. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Robert Mark
Talk:Nördlinger Ries

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 

message: How may I acquire some green glass =moldavite???  Popeye Mariner (talk) 01:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moldavite 

message: See:- Steinheim crater  The link between this event and Nördlinger Ries event is stated as true on the Nördlinger Ries page and as false on the Steinheim page.  The Steinheim page seems better evidenced.  Is there anyone watching who can make an informed correction?
Zoony (talk) 15:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for reporting this. I have added a "contradictory" tag to highlight this in the Nördlinger Ries article's text (until this article's text is more thoroughly updated). GeoWriter (talk) 21:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a first attempt to resolve the contradiction by making a few changes to the Steinheim crater article and then copy/pasting that text into the Nördlinger Ries article. GeoWriter (talk) 21:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory information contained on the Steinheim Crater page (August 2021) 

message: The article states that the Apollo 14 astronauts visited the crater for training.  I believe most of them went there and will try to find a reference for it.  Jstuby (talk) 21:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apollo training
Talk:Dacryodes edulis

message: Is there any justification for listing "African Palm" as a common name for Nsafu?  It seems unlikely and I haven't been able to find support for this.  References to African palm on the Internet are specifically to elaeis guineensis which is, as you might guess, a palm plant and not something that looks more like an avacado tree. Jlavezzo (talk) 02:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  African palm 

message: the description section appears to be partly copy righted from this site, http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea/products/afdbases/af/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=641 SeabluffWind (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The site copyright notice says "ICRAF holds the copyright to its publications and web pages but encourages duplication, without alteration, of these materials for non-commercial purposes. Proper citation is required in all instances." Proper inline citations are needed, though of course, it's still tacky not to rewrite the section (while keeping the citations for each statement). Nadiatalent (talk) 12:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: infringement
Talk:MGM Macau/pre-merge

message: This page preserves the edit history of MGM Macau, which was merged into  on February 29, 2012. On March 18, 2012, "MGM Grand Macau" was renamed to "MGM Macau" following ; hence this peculiar arrangement. Favonian (talk) 13:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not delete this sub-page
Talk:International Middle East Media Center

message: Seems to be a legitimate news site, with its archive going back to 2003. Has also been cited by the UN see https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-206460/ (sorry if you're not meant to include in this page, I haven't really used the talk page so I'm not 100% on etiquette. Further it's now a project of the American nonprofit organization If Americans Knew which has its own wikipedia page, not linking the article proving this here as I'm about the edit the page and add this information to it anyway. Also refered to by at least a few solidarity and peace websites as well as some academic books. Hanikb (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notibility seemingly decent
Talk:Geodetic effect

message: * A diagram illustrating the effect.
* An explanation of what the "related effect" predicted by Willem de Sitter was.
* Filling out the history of the effect.
* Explaining the name.
* Differentiating from frame dragging, and explaining how Gravity Probe B can measure both.
* Mention of any other empirical confirmation.
-- Beland 07:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas for expansion

message: The derivation was short on interpretation and justification. I added some physical interpretation after the fact, but it's quite possible that some of my interpretation is wrong, and needs to be corrected. There's quite a big gap in the reasoning at the point where it refers to canonical form. The wikilink is just to a very generic article on canonical forms throughout all of mathematics.--207.233.88.250 (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: derivation

message: Maybe this helps: http://www.universetoday.com/85401/gravity-probe-b-confirms-two-of-einsteins-space-time-theories/ --Irbian (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Wikipedia talk:Aircraft encyclopedia topics/6

message: Short Brothers made two aircraft called Sherpa: Short Sherpa experimental wing research aircraft or the american military designation C-23 Sherpa which is either a Short 330 or Short 360. Anybody know which one this link refers to? MilborneOne 20:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the freighter based on the 330-200. (p. 942 of the text) --Rlandmann 14:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shorts Sherpa
Talk:Fiat Bravo and Brava

message: This article, if you don't mind me saying so, is in a frankly horrific state.
I shall endeavour to source some better pictures for the article or obtain them myself, as the current ones are a bit patchy. I think an updated infobox is in order aswell...
It seems that as the Marea article has improved, this has gone steadily downhill...Abarthaddict 21:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It appears that the "Fiat Bravo MK2" picture is actually a Brava; acc'ding to the intro a Bravo has 3 doors. The car pictured has 5 (like the Brava). Does anyone know if this is, in fact, a Bravo? If you do, please correct the caption. Thanks.
The Mk2 is indeed a Bravo. Fiat have opted for a single name for the model and chose Bravo for it over Brava. Best site for info on the mk2 Bravo is at http://www.fiat.co.uk/Showroom/#showroom/bravo . Although in Australia it will be known as Ritmo(can be confirmed on fiat australia website).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.222.131 (talk) 04:25, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 
:I do not think the new bravo should be in this pag. It is a completely different car, and not a mark 2 variant of the original Bravo. Onesti (talk) 10:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Naming

message: The 1979, 1980 Brava sold in the USA was a refined 131. The slightly sexier looks and styling deserve photos, of which are online in spades. The DOHC, interior, suspension and 5 speed grear box were all notable niceties that should not be omitted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.106.71 (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brava - not adequately discussed 
Talk:Flora Finch

message: thank you tweet Victuallers (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: thanks

message: Since the first three references/sources are only viewable/accessible with a subscription, I think they should be replaced with more accessible, nonsubscription, sources.  Since Wikipedia prides itself in being the encyclopedia anyone can use, I think the same should be of any sources/references.  (To me, this is a verification issue.) 2600:8800:786:A300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think your concerns are warranted under Wikipedia policy. See WP:SOURCEACCESS. If you know of any more accessible sources, please do add those into the article. However, sources should not be removed just because not everyone can access them. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:White Act of 1898

message: I've been furiously querying every legally available and cost-free database of knowledge my computer can access, but I've made no progress at digging up the origin of the name "White Act".  I assume the answer is one of the two following scenarios:
- "White" is someone's surname; presumably referencing the politician who introduced, authored, or campaigned significantly for the Act's passage.
- "White" is not a proper noun, and thus the name can be assumed to derive from racial connotations.
The first explanation would wrap up the investigation quite simply and mundanely.  The second opens an interesting can of worms that would seem to imply that the Act was engineered to selectively protect a specific racial group.  This finding would necessitate some follow-up investigation on the specific racial dynamics of the shipping industry and to the Pacific coast at large.  Within the context of the subject matter as it relates to semantics (e.g. the word "Shanghaiing"), this seems like a question that would be of interest to the average reader.
Oh and FYI, all the current source references that don't require a library card are broken links or have had the relevant content removed.
2601:2C6:4A80:68F0:C5F7:2EB2:4F7:E97D (talk) 22:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of the "White" Act
Talk:Triangulation (topology)

message: This is a stub! more definition wanted
Can someone clarify "the link of any simplex is a piecewise-linear sphere."?
Dewa (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Better now? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: stub
Talk:Jack Buetel

message: Most biography pages have the Spouse dates listed as the dates the person was a spouse. However, this article has it listed as the dates the spouse was alive! In reference to: Joann Jensen Beutel (1927-1984).
Also, IMDb (HERE: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0119302/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm) shows Jill Browning as his spouse from 1938 to ???
Ipabrewer (talk) 20:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse entry
Category talk:Volcanoes of North America

message: porieuieir4l;5rh djcudhben rbnsc cdxg enmbr uetr jeehgewiuy tieryt4nbtj regt iuerbtn er c     xsmcngdn ernberhgejkre   cn f df cmxnjd e sdnmdjdhmne [[Image:t qry 54recc
----
cvc ccv
== vc  ==
]]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.43.234 (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Étant donnés

message: Link to Maria Martins seems to give the wrong Maria Martins (a runner, not a sculptor.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.148.82 (talk) 02:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

message: This could use more research and citations. Also, to what degree did people believe Duchamp gave up art for chess? And do we have any research backing that up? I'm not arguing the point, but rather, pointing out that we need something to back up statements. 75.48.22.62 (talk) 02:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Documented in Marcel_Duchamp#Transition_from_art_to_chess. Needs some more citations there but it's got some already. Apparently he made his own statements about giving up art for chess. 68.44.132.25 (talk) 06:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research
Talk:List of alternative country musicians

message: My question in regard to this page is whether it is going to be allowed for the band listings to run rampant?  Clearly there is no real definition to what alt country is, so anyone can put anything on here.  Therefore, we have groups like Big & Rich, who are clearly doing something very mainstream, even if it is a little different than some of the pop country.
My other concern is simply the fact that close to half of these links don't go to anything.  These either need to be fixed, unlinked, or deleted.  I don't really want to start deleting, as this list is a means of keeping people from incessantly trying to add their own band into the alt country article as the next big thing, so I would recommend these need to be either fixed, if the band has a page, or unlinked. Buddyholly4 21:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wrote the entries to two three four of the bands on this list. There are a lot more here that clearly deserve articles and don't have them yet. Chubbles 01:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a huge difference between being an artist of a genre and being influenced by that genre.  For example, on this list is Credence Clearwater Revival who, while being influenced by Buck Owens are not alt.contry in and of themselves.  I'll leave the argument about the Bakersfield Sound and its relationship to alt.country to others. RhodyJim 15:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Influencers

message: This article does not have any sources, and is not verifiable per WP:VERIFY.   Ndenison talk 13:42, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability 

message: This list is a mess right now. There are some bands on here that could be considered extremely controversial as alt-country bands, e.g. Spoon, White Stripes, The Raconteurs, and Kings of Leon, just to name a few. This article desperately needs some sourcing and purging for verifiability. Redfarmer (talk) 10:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with all four of those you listed.  There are others, as well, as you imply, that are questionable, at best.  And, yes, we need some sort of standard for verifiability. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Siegfried Seidl

message: The Volksgericht which sentenced Siegfried Seidl to death must not be mixed up with the Volksgerichtshof that was established in National Socialist Germany in 1934.
The Volksgericht (the translation is indeed the same as of Volksgerichtshof - People's Court) was a court which was set up after WW II by the re-established Republic of Austria to deal with Nazi crimes that had been committed between the Anschluss of Austria in 1938 and the end of the war in 1945. It was in effect until 1955. (See de:Volksgericht (Österreich) - in German.) --Wolfgang glock 21:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Volksgerichtshof - Volksgericht (Austria)
Template talk:Trim

message: semi-protect. This could become a victim of vandlism. Jaymac407 21:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the future, this belongs at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Cbrown1023 talk 21:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Declined There has been no vandalism thus far and it does not qualify as a Wikipedia:High-risk templates. Cbrown1023 talk 21:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: Input:
xx
Expected output:
 x# testx
Received output:
x
# testx
--Larivact (talk) 16:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is normal for all templates. See Help:Template#Problems and workarounds, first bullet. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading list markers result in a newline 

message: Hello, this template currently supports "x" as an alternative name for the parameter (refs [ 668935791]). Though, this alternative name isn't used at all on the wiki (nor documented).
You can check it by yourself:
* insource:"Trim" insource:/Trim *\| *x *\=/i
And the redirects:
* Pages that link to "User:Dragons flight/str trim"
* insource:"Strip whitespace" insource:/\| *x *\=/
* insource:"Str trim" insource:/\| *x *\=/
* insource:"StripWhitespace" insource:/\| *x *\=/
* insource:"Cut" insource:/Cut *\| *x *\=/i
The results are actually some <nowiki>'ed code examples, and a few false positives (the above searches are deliberately broad). The only change I had to make: [ 1117988946] (and [ 1117988966]).
Removing this parameter would be a minor optimization, but multiplied by the 1705162 transclusions it may be interesting ;-)
Od1n (talk) 16:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just asking to replace  with . I demonstrated above the "x" parameter name isn't used anywhere. Od1n (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, looks like that came over as a result of a merge in from the Template:Strip whitespace redirect.  any special notes on that (c.f. Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_19#Template:Strip_whitespace)? — xaosflux Talk 10:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove unused "x" parameter 

message: How do I turn "text text text" into "texttexttext"? --16:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: IP's trim request

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Template:Cut and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#Template:Cut until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  User:GKFXtalk 21:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Cut" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Compression member

message: Are you sure that the euler's formula that the link is discussing and your using here is the same as the euler's formula that you've linked to?  I'm not seeing it.  You link to http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/columns/intro.cfm, then at the site go to http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/columns/columns.cfm to see what i mean 
128.253.43.20 21:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: why do you keep an empty article??--Arnaugir (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  empty 
Category talk:Lists of volcanoes

message: ===Eruption Events===
I came here looking for Lists of volcano eruptions.  (Specifically, what were the big ones in the 1980s?)
Didn't find it here.  Will keep looking, back on Google.
Please edit these Category Lists to make them more useful.  Thanks.Jamesdowallen (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing list: Eruption Events 

message: I came here looking for Lists of volcano eruptions.  (Specifically, what were the big ones in the 1980s?)
Didn't find it here.  Will keep looking, back on Google.
Please edit these Category Lists to make them more useful.  Thanks.Jamesdowallen (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eruption Events
Talk:Browning Arms Company

message: This article is missing any info about history, other than the Nazi propaganda link I just added.
It is also too much like an official website, or a PR page. Tagged.
Samfreed (talk) 22:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History