Talk:Ben Mitchell (EastEnders)

message: This page is constantly being vandalised by someone who seems to dislike the image. Maybe we should find another one that they would approve of, lol.Gungadin 19:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we can't bow to the vandal's wishes. I've reported the long-term problem here. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They'll never approve of any image because they don't like the character. However, I can't seem to keep it removed from the actor's page, where it's not allowed! — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: :Image:Kath phil ben.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Kath phil ben.jpg

message: *Mitchell kids to return to Walford -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Kudos to Frickative for her recent rewrite of this article. Here's hoping a nice "Exit storyline" section can be added soon... Bradley0110 (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I want Ben to stay in the show. I want to see him grow into a man. I want to know what he'll be like! And I hope they keep the same actor on. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite 

message: Would it be ok to put Ben a New picture on due to the current one was in 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheep 2009 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the image can be from any time, but I think a better one would be better. AnemoneProjectors 12:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture 

message: It's been confirmed that Ben is being recast. Although he's "expected" to make a temporary departure, should we now say he's not departing at all? AnemoneProjectors 10:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it anyway, and added a "characters being recast" section to the list of characters. "Expected" to make a departure isn't confirmation that he will at all. Though the original source did say Ben was leaving... does the new source override that one? AnemoneProjectors 10:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting! I'd say the new source definitely overrides the old one, and the 'recast' section is the best way to deal with it. Good stuff. Frickative 11:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recast 

message: There's some reception for Ben in this month's Gay Times. I'll add it when I can. (There's also stuff in there for Dot, Colin and Barry, Kim Fox, and Vanessa Gold (and Sharon)). –AnemoneProjectors– 13:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Is Ben now considered a villain? And can we find a source so he can go on the list of soap opera villains? :-) –AnemoneProjectors– 14:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh no, he is a villain - I saw a source the other day! Where I dunno.Rain the 1 15:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Villain? 

message: Is it just me or does the picture look ridiculous with the two actors appearing to lean away from each other, leaving a massive gap in the focal point? Can both halves be mirrored so they lean to the centre, or just swap the two pictures round? U-Mos (talk) 22:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks pretty good to me, I think it's okay. GeorgePing! 22:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a crop of the image found here, we can't really edit it other than cropping. I think it's fine. –AnemoneProjectors– 09:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: This article needs semi pp until after the episodes concerning the supposed death have occurred. There is no confirmation the actor has left. It seems more likely another character will be the deceased but there is no source for that either...Rain the 1 08:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with you on this. And have protected for 10 days. anemoneprojectors 09:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wave of disruptive edits 

message: Today I broke up the "Storylines" section with a few more section headers, and moved some illustrative images of Ben's actors to their appropriate places in those sections. These were pretty minor changes aimed at improving readability.  then reverted, commenting "unnecessary". Soaper1234: explain. DBD 19:22, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I performed the edit since the storylines section is not generally broken down into different stories as it can become a bit too messy. I would strongly disagree with the idea that it improves "readability". The images are in the places they are because that is the infobox places them, and because they are more appropriate in the development section. Soaper1234 - talk 19:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The plot section is too long because of excessive detail. I have always viewed subheadings in plot sections as a tactic to distract others from wanting to condense the plot. Subheadings work well in the development section and compliment the out-of-universe style they are written in.Rain the 1 20:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section headers and images 

message: Is there a reason this page follows a different format to every other EE wikipedia page? Would it not be better to have it conform to the same style as each other article? Tomski12 (talk) 11:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The formatting is to suit what  calls for, which follows multiple MOS:ACCESS requirements, which we must follow as an encyclopedia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus (and little participation after a month). Without extensive evidence, it's hard to justify the "primary topic grab", and the current situation does not seem to inconvenience readers.  No such user (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ben Mitchell (EastEnders) →  – There is only one other page with the title "Ben Mitchell" and that is Ben Mitchell (rugby union). The Eastenders character is the WP:PRIMARY TOPIC having been in Eastenders  since 1996. Sahaib3005 (talk) 09:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 July 2021