Portal talk:Film/Archive 1

message: I see it's been since the start of September last year, that the selected article and selected picture were last changed (Or added, I believe). I don't mind changing them, but I thought I should get some consensus first, like what article should replace it? How it should be chosen? and should we use featured articles or selected articles?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Typhin (talk • contribs) 01:46, 6 January (ACST).
:(Please sign your posts) Using the term "selected" is probably advisable. Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Featured pictures are perhaps the best place to turn when choosing, although you may also wish to look at Wikipedia:Good articles or other language versions of this portal (it's featured on Wikipédia française).--cj | talk 16:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (Sorry, I usually sign my posts, just forgot this time, I'll try not to again!) I agree that selected would be better to avoid confusion, but, like the Cricket Portal (which is a featured portal), they use Featured Article, including only cricket related articles, that in the past have been Featured, there are also several previously featered Film related article which could be used. Sorry for any confusion. Anyway, thanks for your help! -Typhin 17:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means, change the article (or if you won't I will), this portal's been rejected for long enough. I'll add an article rotation thing on the page later if no one objects. Also, if no one objects I'd like to remove the selected picture altogether from the page, since I don't think there are enough good pictures about films here that would fall under fair use for this purpose (featured pictures unsurprisingly has 0 pictures related to film). - Bobet 16:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could interpret "film" broadly and display photographs of people, places and things related to it. There should be enough images to rotate on a monthly basis, and if not, there's no harm in repeating after a given time. Of course, "selected picture" isn't a required element of a portal, but it is somewhat worthwhile.--cj | talk 09:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I added a picture rotation to the page too since it could be nice to have, I just hope it will get something besides pictures from public domain films before people get tired of them. If someone finds good pictures relating to films, please add them to the rotation (they'll all be in the form of "Portal:Film/Selected picture monthname year") or message me. - Bobet 19:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to change? 

message: Can we not put on some kind of article rotation as well? To display a new featured article every... say... week? That would be GOOD!  - User:Gelo3 12:04, 26 January 2006 (ETA)
:(I added a new section and edited the formatting on the previous comment). I already put a monthly rotation thing up, sorry for not mentioning that here. I don't think there are enough people using the portal to make weekly rotation very practical. There are currently selected articles for January and February, following the naming convention Portal:Film/Selected article January 2006 etc. (they and all the other subpages of the portal are at :Category:Film portal)- Bobet 01:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.. ok if you think so... i personally would love it weekly but i guess you're right.. there aren't enough people visiting this portal to make that practical.... - Gelo3 01:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't get me wrong, if you'd like to have a weekly rotation, I don't think anyone would try to stop you. You'd just have to find enough good articles about films and write the short summaries that appear on the main portal page. You can do that now, too, and add them for March or April if you want. Wikipedia:Featured articles has some good articles that you could put up if you don't know where to start looking. - Bobet 01:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rotation

message: Considering the vast topic of motion picture industry, I think it deserves a separate wiki altogether. This way Wikipedia could be an encyclopedia of general knowledge, and Wikimovies could tackle a more detailed view of films, filmmakers, studios, etc. This project could attract many wikipedians who want to specialize on cinema, like contributing synopsis of films and TV series episodes, artist biography and other interesting trivia. --84.188.182.171 01:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or they could do the exact same thing here. There's already a Wikipedia:WikiProject Films with around 80 people on it, you'd have a hard time getting that many people to write for your site, notwithstanding the people who write articles about films that haven't put their names on the list. There's a list of film wikis in the Film industry article though if someone's interested. - Bobet 12:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimovies 

message: Wikipedia:Article assessment is currently accepting submissions for "1980s comedy films".  Next week all the submissions will be assessed.  Please consider adding a submission and helping with the assessments next week.  violet/riga (t) 10:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment 

message: Film industry seems to have been mostly a duplicate of film which was expanded to the point of breaking. It heavily duplicates history of film and film crew (both of which I've added merge tags for, since there is some information that should be moved over). I did some cleanup, but much more is needed. Your help is appreciated. -Harmil 16:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone made a complete mess of the page with this edit, pretty much taking the article Film and then cutting and pasting more things from the pages pointed to by the  template (the Film history, Film theory etc. pages). I'm going to ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films and if no one objects, I'll just revert it to this version, that's actually about film industry. - Bobet 17:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film industry needs help! 

message: I apologize if this is somehow considered spamming or vandalism, but I thought this might be of interest to people who contribute to the Film Portal. If this should be deleted, by all means do so. I've created a filmmaking wiki, at http://wikifilmschool.com. My aim is not to duplicate the efforts of the Film Portal or any other project that seeks to catalogue films themselves (though, in truth, that may be an eventual effect if the project grows as large as I hope it will), but rather focus on the art and craft of how films and movies are actually made; cataloguing technique, terms, resources, and all knowledge that is related to how one would actually put together a motion picture. My goal is to cross the spectrum of filmmaking, from informing on the arcana of names and terms used in professional filmmaking that are only generally privy to professionals and people who have accumulated schooling and/or experience to cataloguing every possible way to achieve professional level results with as little money and as little "industry standard" equipment as conceivable. I hope some people will be interested in contributting, as Wikifilmschool could benefit from people with general wiki experience (formatting, templates, community building, etc.) as much as actual content. I intend to post this in a few other spots related to film, so I apologize in advance to anyone who comes across this message more than once. HamillianActor 19:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi HamillianActor, Wikipedia itself is also in need of more information on filmmaking: the article Filmmaking could be elaborated. The Film Portal itself I think could also refer more to film production instead of just film consumption. Your initiative could support Wikipedia and vice versa: there are multiple views on filmmaking. GL, Brz7 21:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, I certainly intend to add to Wikipedia, particularly on the topic of filmmaking. Of course, the enemy is time, and finding it among all other professional, personal, real-world, and internet based obligations. I was hoping to at least get http://wikifilmschool.com running on some small amount of steam before diving into Wikipedia as a whole. But I am well aware that being a more established Wikipedia contributer will lend my own independent project more credibility. Thank you for your advice and support. HamillianActor 16:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Wiki For Filmmaking

message: I've removed the movie poster image in the selected article section, as it was a violation of Wikipedia's fair use policy. Please remember that fair use images can only be used in the article main spaces (the main page though is an exception).--TBCTaLk?!? 08:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use image

message: Portal:Film/New article announcements seems needed. Cheers, Camptown 12:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a list at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Film articles by quality log that does the same thing. Adding it to here wouldn't work (in my opinion) since the list would be way too long, unless it was cut down to a day or so. If you want to make a bot that does that and posts it here, go ahead, otherwise it won't work. - Bobet 12:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/New articles for now.  Portal:Film/Did you know can either use this page or we can setup Portal:Film/New article announcements to start uploading film-related DYK to the main WP:DYK.  I would like to see this process automated, with bots pushing proposed feeds from the portals to queues on the main WP:DYK, but this hasn't happened yet. —Viriditas | Talk 22:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portal:Film/New article announcements 

message: I proposed a Wikiproject Film related DYK, it will likely make it to the front page, as every submission I have done for DYK has, I was wondering should I post it here, or you can if you want to. It is for the article Will: G. Gordon Liddy (film). Two different hooks below. 
*...that former child-actor Danny Lloyd, famous for uttering "redrum" in the 1980 film The Shining, took his last film role in the 1982 made for television movie Will: G. Gordon Liddy?
*Alternate hook: ...that copies of the 1982 made for television movie Will: G. Gordon Liddy are stored in the Nixon Presidential Materials collection at the U.S. National Archives?
IvoShandor 12:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to edit any part of the portal, the edit links are there for a reason. And I personally would appreciate not being the only one to ever edit the portal. - Bobet 12:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, I used the first hook because I think they are going to use the other one for the main page. Also, I would have bolded the links that the DYKs were pointing to (the ones already there) but wasn't sure which articles they were supposed to point to, do you know? Thanks. IvoShandor 12:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've avoided bolding the titles, mostly because the entries were usually about actors and actresses (originally), while the project's about films. The reason the current entries are there in the first place is that they were easy to found at the main DYK archives, instead of having to think of new entries on my own. And the main reason any word is bolded at the main DYK page is because that makes it easier to identify the actual 'new' article, which in these cases wouldn't be helpful since the actual articles are years old. If you feel like bolding something though, be my guest. - Bobet 12:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Right on. Do I hear crickets chirping here? Sure is deserted. IvoShandor 12:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Will

message: The article Skyscrapers in film recently survived WP:AFD with "no consensus", another editor is threatening to nominate Bridges in film for deletion. Does this wikiproject think these sorts of articles are worth having and keeping? Carlossuarez46 18:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: XXX in film articles

message: Are blank.  Is there a decision process?  If not, want to nominate one here? gren グレン 04:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, there's no decision process, and there's no need to nominate anything. If you want to put something as some month's featured article/picture, just do it. I've been stuck choosing them for the past year and a half, when I've remembered to, usually from featured articles so I can just copy the blurbs without having to do anything. If you need help with the formatting, just ask. Thanks. - Bobet 08:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  May featured article / picture 

message: I believe there used to be a page of editorial guidelines for writing movie articles, listing, for examples, the subheads sections to be used ("Synopsis," "Reception," etc.).  I cannot find any reference to this at WikiProject Film. Can anyone help? Thanks -- Tenebrae 21:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines. There is a link on the WikiProject page but its not too obvious. IvoShandor 21:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial guidelines

message: I am a history student at UGA and I have created and edited Abby Singer (film) as a film history project. I need to improve this article. Also it has been said that it is not notable. Please help CamdawgUGA 01:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need help with film article

message: Please visit Template talk:Imdb name to discuss new capabiliy provided by  with a demonstration at . Thank you. – Conrad T. Pino 09:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Imdb name proposed edit