Talk:Kender (Dragonlance)

message: A draft/sandbox version of the article addressing many concerns raised can be found at Talk:Kender/Draft. Vassyana (talk) 13:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *I have moved the content of the draft into the mainspace article, removing unattributed material.--Gavin Collins (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft sandbox 

message: I must admit that Gavin did help with this article quite a bit, even if he didn't want to. Should it be nominated for GA? -Drilnoth (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it still needs some more work for GA, but that would be BOZ to know, as I am just a research monkey in finding facts and such. [insert image of monkey] shadzar-talk 22:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with Shadzar, that this one could use some more work before it's ready for all that. I like to push an article along, and this one has a long way to go. Also, if it would mean "working" with Gavin again, I think I've had my fill of that. ;) BOZ (talk) 22:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would most certainly NOT mean "working" with Gavin again. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But would we even have a choice in the matter? BOZ (talk) 22:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure we would. If Gavin comes in and starts messing up the article we revert the vandalism accordingly. As it stands I think there are more important things to focus on and should be done first like the basics of D&D such as the books and such and let these spin-off articles come later after we get more of the foundation of the projects articles up to spec and try to get the stubs into something more even if they end up needing much more work. shadzar-talk 22:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense. I'll remove this article from the announcements. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed 100% on where our focus should lie - let's get the important tangible stuff up to GA/FA like books and designers and even campaign settings before worrying about stuff like this. I never really cared for kender anyway. ;) BOZ (talk) 23:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Same; I just saw someone mention that this might make a GA, and thought it would be worth mentioning. -Drilnoth (talk) 23:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Reassessment, November 18th 2008 

message: - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible refs

message: Regarding the list under the appearance section, I was going to attempt to turn it into prose as I finish up the copy-edit. Any suggestions or objections? -Pax85 (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can do it, you might as well.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. I am going to finish the copy-edit tomorrow evening (Pacific time). After I finish the general copy-edit, I will work on that section in my sandbox. Feel free to make any edits there if you like. Sorry this isn't getting done quicker (I think we are nearing a week since I took the request) but I am in the middle of mid-term exams right now... -Pax85 (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: What is the plural of kender? Would it be kender, or kenders? I have seen it mostly used without the "s" in the article, but I just ran into a paragraph that stated it as kenders. I just want to double-check, and if it does indeed employ the "s" I will go back through and correct it. -Pax85 (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification