Talk:Trunks (Dragon Ball)

message: I am wondering about the organization of the article. Perhaps there should be a global heading such as "Incarnations" underwhich their various incarnations could be listed and described. Also, there is not a clear "Plot" section. How and when does Trunks incarnate and how does this relate to the general history of Trunks?
These questions may sound silly as I am trying to understand the article. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was pretty certain that the plot was clear. It's divided accordantly to relevance of both incarnations. I was trying to keep the article out of universe as much as possible as per guidelines. "As for a global heading", the names Future Trunks and Present Trunks should be enough. Sarujo (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: Burning Attack is his signiture attack, it was used more than once within the series. and regardless of whether or not they had a name in either the manga or anime, they have names now. All of the characters attacks are named, as stated by Toriyama. I purpossly left out the Heat Dome and Masenko attacks because their lack of there of. Sarujo (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When was it used again? I only remember the one time it was used against Freeza. It doesn't really matter if its named anyway, as it has no actual plot significance. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 21:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He used it againt #18. Plot signifigance is irelivent, most of there attacks often fail their purpose, the attack's association with the character is. But if you insist on plot signifigance, the attack was used to kill Freeza. Although it didn't directly kill him, it was used as a distraction. Sarujo (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plot significance as in the name is actually mentioned outside of the reference books, and actually is shown to be used multiple times, and has something special about it beyond just being an energy blast. Trunks only uses it again in the anime, and even then only once. Plot significance is relevant, and is the only reason to actually have the attacks listed, wikipedia is not an indiscriminite collection of information. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 00:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attacks 

message: It is mentioned in this that the future trunks turns SSJ3 during the Cell saga, I dont ever remember this happening in either the anime or the manga. 219.88.193.30 (talk) 15:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not the same thing as Goku and Gotenks' Super Saiyan 3. What Trunks achieved was the three known stages of Super Saiyan 1 or ascensions. Some have even used the term Ultra Saiyan. In this form his muscles pumped up. Sarujo (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it should be marked as SSJ stage 3, not just SSJ3. 125.237.153.49 (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No it states the form as third Super Saiyan grade. Which is a difference from just SS3. Also, in case you haven't noticed, we can't use SSJ. Sarujo (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSJ3? 

message: I just rewatched their Match and Trunks actually just cheats one times more than Goten Referingn to this as several Times inst really corrcet  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.127.246.198 (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defeating Son Goten  

message: Buruma is reference to bloomers (clothing) and Trunks is reference to torankusu meaning "boxer shorts", as most Japanese people would have figured out.
I found a paper someone published at the academia.edu site, and it mistakenly states that Trunks means "brief shorts". --Kiyoweap (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underwear 

message: One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC). 
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 28. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion nomination(s)