Talk:Mainz

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Mainz]] 

message: What are you doing  Zindegi (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is that  

message: Bikbbgfdgiv Zindegi (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimhg 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mainz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524083053/http://www.landeshauptarchiv.de/index.php?id=329 to http://www.landeshauptarchiv.de/index.php?id=329
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mainz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928025606/http://www.landeshauptarchiv.de/fileadmin/blick/images/30.08.0.1.full.jpg to http://www.landeshauptarchiv.de/fileadmin/blick/images/30.08.0.1.full.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130308155830/http://images.google.com/hosted/life/a1fa68d50b8bc299.html to https://images.google.com/hosted/life/a1fa68d50b8bc299.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mainz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160517040041/http://images.google.com/hosted/life/9efa86295e2009bb.html to https://images.google.com/hosted/life/9efa86295e2009bb.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: About this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mainz&diff=856258750&oldid=856240702<BR/>
First Bishop in Mainz was by legend Crescenz around 80 AD; first verifiable Bishop of Mainz was Martinus in 343. In no way Boniface was first bishop in Mainz.</br>
First <U>arch</U>bishop <U>in</U> Mainz was Boniface, he became archbishop pro hac vice in 732, and in 745 he was granted Mainz as metropolitan see. So he was actually not archishop of mainz, which was at that time not a regular archiepsicopal see until 781. So Boniface was first archbishop in  Mainz and Lullus became first archbishop of Mainz. I therefore revert the wrong version of "first bishop in Mainz, Boniface," which is wrong in many ways, back to "first archbishop in Mainz, Boniface". --mmg (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that "See DS"-note; bad habit from too much work on german WP:-) I guess, everything should be clarified with my in-between edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mainz&diff=next&oldid=856358364 - Are you OK with that? --mmg (talk) 18:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: mmg, alles klar. Thanks. There is much more to do here--the German articles on this topic are still superior, and we can do with more sourcing, but that's for a later date. Thank you for your help and your comments: you were much more correct than I gave you credit for, and I owe you an apology, and myself possibly a new pair of glasses. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First bishop 

message: Two variants are given for the pronunciation of the name. But it is hard to see what the difference is. --Alazon (talk) 19:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Dear user:Alexandermcnabb, I noticed you made recent edits, mostly to tag following lines with citation needed. This is very excessive and you shouldn't tag every line in the paragraph, instead, just tag the end of the paragraph.
On the other hand, what you didn't like is actually common sense and needs a look on a map. What citation do we need, do you have eyes and could you see? I believe, some people on Wikipedia miss the point of referencing. It's like tagging the sentence, the sun rises from the east[citation needed]. We are not robots. The sentences you tagged are not controversial political arguments. Thanks. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive citation needed tags 

message: :"Mainz spoke a dialect termed Ripuarian." (series: Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik – Beihefte)
:
* That lacks the page.
* ripuarisch/Ripuarisch only occurs on p. 73 in a totally unrelated context (and on p. 254 in the title of another work cited).
* On p. 133 it is: "Da allerdings die Untersuchungsorte Wittlich und Mainz sprachsystemisch verschiedene n Großarealen zuzuordnen sind (moselfränkisches Wittlich vs. rheinfränkisches Mainz) [...]", i.e. Rhine Franconian Mainz.
--21:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripuarian