lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frederick William, Duke of Cieszyn

message: Google books result :Dukes of Cieszyn = 1400-1920 = 3 books 
1400-1945 = 20 books, 1960 = 44, 1980 =104, 2008=200 books
Google book result :Dukes of Teschen 1400-1945 = 798 books, 2008 = 858 books
Duke of Cieszyn by 1920 = result 3 books, 1945 = 20 books, 2008 = 200 books
Despite that there were no Dukes of Cieszyn until after 1920/1945, and the name Duke of Teschen is the correct one, a group of people at Wikipedia  want to force recently invented names, such as Dukes of Cieszyn on the public, insinuating, that this is the long established correct name 
Teschen and Duchy of Teschen on 1600s Map of Duchy of Silesia with Teschen in Duchy of Teschen
An Observer (71.137.197.97 (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dukes of Teschen (Dukes of Cieszyn not a historical name at all)
Talk:Hans-Werner Grosse

message: The original source of some pieces of information may be http://www.alteadler.de/aktuell/jubilaeen/grosse.html --Vierzehn (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here´s sth for the media section: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmIwzWVbe08 --176.6.64.7 (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarkson meets the Neighbours
Talk:Parameter identification problem

message: The example in the article is more or less consistent with the example at Reduced form; please do not break this consistency.
: This includes the use of the symbol M for the number of endogenous variables. See also the motivation for this choice, in the invisible comment in the article where M is introduced. Arie ten Cate (talk) 10:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

message: The addition to the introduction of 1 February 2008 by HyDeckar is useful: in fact, up to that point in time the introduction did not state what the problem was, but only stated in what cirumstances it might occur. (Hence HyDeckar's starting phrase "More generally, ..." is a bit too modest?) 
The addition discusses a statistical model, including the expression "the same distribution of observations" (as opposed to simply "the same observations"). However, in the present version of the page, the logic of identification is discussed as simple as possible, without statistics (disturbance terms, probability distribution of the data, etcetera). 
Maybe the article must be generalized further by adding after the present discussion a section introducing statistics/stochastics, and thereby linking it better to the discussion of the subject in modern econometrics text? 
(In order to make sure that the "more than one equation" in the first sentence of the (old) introduction is not read as having a similar meaning as HyDeckar's  "more than one set of parameters which generate the same distribution of observations", I have changed the former somewhat, increasing the precision at the cost of making it slightly more jargon-ish ("multiple equation system"). See my second 3 February 2008 change to the article.) 
Arie ten Cate (talk) 10:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The introduction

message: This article describes identifiability in econometrics and economics. There is a separate statistics article called identifiability. Sav8i8 (talk) 11:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with 'identifiability' article 

message: Dr. Lippi has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Lippi has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Forni, Mario & Lippi, Marco & Reichlin, Lucrezia, 2003. "Opening the Black Box: Structural Factor Models versus Structural VARs," CEPR Discussion Papers 4133, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 11:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Lippi's comment on this article
Talk:Floating airport

message: Novel written by Curt Siodmak  "Flugplatform 1 meldet sich nicht      from 1931 utilises the concept.
Turned into a 3lingual 1932 movie from UFA
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.214.196.103 (talk) 18:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  floating airports in fiction and cinema 
Category talk:Airports by type

message: Ladies and gentlemen, we may have missing some common types here. First of all, this category should be in line with the "public/private/military" parameter of the Template:Infobox airport (or the other way around). Then, there is a substantial number of industrial airfileds (some of them featuring long runways) that are neither airports nor airbases. This is particularly true for Ukraine: the Sviatoshyn Airfield is certainly neither of those, and the Hostomel Airport is too, I suspect. As I found out from Ukrainian Wikipedia, several major airbases here became de-facto industrial airstrips as only the civilian maintenance companies created to serve the air force units survive there. Finally, the Mojave Spaceport and some Airbus facilities are essentially industrial airfields and not public airports. Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 04:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial airfield as a separate type?
Talk:Platyzoa

message: This section doesn't jive with other reading I did on Platyzoa. Specifically, the Platyzoa are a subgroup of Spiralia, which itself is a subgroup of the Lophotrochozoa. This section says that Platyzoa and Lophotrochozoa make up the Spiralia, which according to the map on the bottom of this page is not true. In fact, the Spiralia and Lophophorata make up the Lophotrochozoa.
Jsg278 (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification
Talk:Lancia Aurelia

message: "It was an all-alloy [...] design" - While it may be obvious to a motorhead what is meant by this, the general public reading an encyclopedia needs an explanation. My guess is, that the cylinder block is made out of some kind of cast aluminum? Also what does "all-alloy" even mean? I suppose they still needed quite a bit of steel for cylinder sleeves, piston rings, shafts, valves, bearings, ...  --BjKa (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Alloy?
Talk:Donald L. Howard

message: Don Howard passed away November 9, 2022. 2600:6C67:287F:F3ED:CCE8:D64C:3082:6CD9 (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed away
Talk:Political alienation

message: Political apathy is essentially the same, same causes, same possible solutions. HudecEmil (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal  

message: Reason: overlapping meaning HudecEmil (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Political alienation into Political apathy
Talk:Lancia Gamma

message: Aldo Brovarone designed only coupe version
http://www.studiotorino.com/en/auto/spyder/brovarone.htm 
don't know the designer of the berlina  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ybsone (talk • contribs) 10:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupe Design 
Talk:Chiredzi District

message: Could details of more recent elections than 2008 be added (and my intro line can be extended). Jackiespeel (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections
Talk:Canadian Bank of Commerce

message: Bank of Canada (commercial) was not an operational bank but merely a charter issued in 1858, which was not actioned until 1866 by the Canadian Bank of Commerce. DMBanks1 (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Blank and merge.  This seems incredibly trivial, not worth an article. 162 etc. (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Agree. This is a very trivial stub and should be merged. Sargdub (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. 162 etc. (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Lancia Musa

message: Let me know what was wrong with this part, I would like to improve it.
"In 2005 Leonardo Fioravanti presented his restyled prototype version of Musa. Externally differentiated by new bumpers and special conceptual roof from Kite concept car. Reupholstered interior and redesigned rear and trunk compartment with teak flooring."
http://www.fioravanti.it/2003/werke/kandhar/main_kandhar-ENG.htm YBSOne (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it because there was no context explaining what it is. Is it a factory prototype? A conversion of some sort? A stylist's design project? The reference was of no help in determining that.<P>The best I could gather was that it was some sort of aftermarket conversion, which is typically not considered notable. --Sable232 (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello All Of You. To Clarify Fiat Made The Lancia Musa. Dosent Mean It Is Related. They Are Also Called. Vehbikerem2010 (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  KANDHAR 

message: I suggest comparing both vehicles’s interiors, because that is kinda where your wrong. MrArslan2010 (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you had paid attention to the hidden note you deleted, you would have seen where to find the answer. --Sable232 (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both vehicles has the same interior so why should it be related and not aka?
Talk:Berthold Epstein

message: He was born in 1897 and finished his medical studies in 1914?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.221.22.39 (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Flag of Poland.jpg

message: Wikipedia does not have a talk page with this exact title. Before creating this page, please verify that Image:Flag of Poland.jpg exists. 
To start a page called Image talk:Flag of Poland.jpg, type in the box below. When you are done, preview the page to check for errors and then save it. 
To experiment, please use the sandbox. 
If a page was recently created here, it may not yet be visible because of a delay in updating the database; wait for a few minutes and try the purge function. If the page has been deleted, please see Why was my page deleted?. You may also wish to check the deletion discussion archive. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Spam. 
This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (69.14.234.234 (talk) 20:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Mining Journal

message: Calling a daily newspaper slanted requires some serious substantiation, it seems to me. Mangoe (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 780 478-6175 208.98.223.123 (talk) 02:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

text: That's all a lot of WP:OR, and while we're talking about Forrester, at the moment it seems pretty likely that he's going to fail to get the necessary consents, not that that's germane. Give me a citation, OK? Mangoe (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo-Conservative?
Talk:Elizabeth Lucretia, Duchess of Cieszyn

message: Dear Darwinek, Emperor of Austria in 1625 is historical nonsense. Empire of Austria was from 1804. Duchy was fief of  Bohemia and Empire cannot interfere in relations between king and duchess. Yopie 22:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I resent that tone of yours. It is now referenced, you can check it yourself (if you can read schwabach of course). - Darwinek (talk) 22:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for references, I can read in schwabach :-) BTW This is secondary source, and as I understand this, this privilege was by emperor Ferdinand II. as king of Bohemia, because privilege from 1498 is by King Vladislav and is about relations between king and duke. It´s customary in German books (and Czech too) to talk about monarch with his higher title (eg. Emperor Charles IV., Emperesse Marie Theresa),  but  in law you must differentiate, that one person can have many roles (eg. Queen of Canada and Queen of United Kingdom  is same physical person, but in constitutional law not). You as actor must know it, that same person have many roles. Teschen was not direct fief of Empire and thus privilege cannot be from Ferdinand II. as Emperor, but from King. Yopie 23:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Most important is, it is the same person. -- Darwinek (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Google books result :Dukes of Cieszyn = 1400-1920 = 3 books 
1400-1945 = 20 books, 1960 = 44, 1980 =104, 2008=200 books
Google book result :Dukes of Teschen 1400-1945 = 798 books, 2008 = 858 books
Duke of Cieszyn by 1920 = result 3 books, 
  
1945 = 20 books, 2008 = 200 books
Despite that there were no Dukes of Cieszyn until after 1920/1945, and the name Duke of Teschen is the correct one, a group of people at Wikipedia ,  want to force recently invented names, such as Dukes of Cieszyn on the public, insinuating, that this is the long established correct name 
Teschen and Duchy of Teschen on 1600s Map of Duchy of Silesia with Teschen in Duchy of Teschen
Teschen in Silesia in Germany on 1600s Map of Teschen/Silesia/Germania (Holy Roman Empire of Germany)
An Observer (71.137.197.97 (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I support you. Such suggestions as you have made, have been made on other places allready , but Poles on Wikipedia prevailed over common usage in English.--Qasinka (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dukes of Teschen (Dukes of Cieszyn not a historical name at all)
Talk:Passenger Vessel Services Act of 1886

message: Isn't this the same as the Passenger Vessel Services Act of 1886?  If so, should the article be renamed to its full correct name? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, it does appear to be the same act.  Moving/renaming the article now. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Full name?
Talk:Film commission

message: Erm, what's the point of this section? Wikipedia isn't a directory, and as directories go, this one is pretty poor. Hairhorn (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A very late response, but I agree and have removed the directory section. I've been trying to find some good sources on this, but  am finding my efforts hampered by the fact that there are so many film commissions. All the results I am finding are related to specific film commissions as opposed to discussing the topic in a general fashion. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Film Commissions Listed
Talk:Vauxhall Velox

message: The cars sold by Harcombes in 1949 were just the same structural (and other) design as prewar cars with new mudguards, a bulging bootlid, built-in headlights and some horizontal bars up front, probably a face-lift designed at the end o the 1930s. Eddaido (talk) 11:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  LIP Vauxhall 

message: I don't know enough about cars to do a direct edit to this article, but there is a serious error in the first sentence. 1948 is given as the date for the introduction of the Vauxhall Velox. However, there was an earlier Vauxhall Velox. In fact, Wikipedia has an entry for it. See "Vauxhall 30-98".  
I discovered this while reading Aldous Huxley's "Those Barren Leaves", a 1925 novel, set in Italy. One of the characters drives a Vauxhall Velox. Here is the first sentence among many in which Huxley mentions the Velox by name: "Lord Hovenden detached from his motor car was an entirely different being from the Lord Hovenden who lounged with such a deceptive air of languor behind the steering-wheel of a Vauxhall Velox."
1) The article should be emended to include the earlier version of the Velox. 
2) The Huxley novel should be added to the section, "Vauxhall Velox in popular culture." Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vauxhall Velox Tourer 30-98 (1913-1927)
Talk:Vauxhall Wyvern

message: General Motors bought Holdens, a coachbuilder, and Holden continued to make their bodies. GM's American (strictly speaking Canadian - Imperial Preference) vehicles sold in Australia were never identical to to the North American counterpart. (Maybe biggest Buicks and Cadillacs an exception fully imported). I know this because living in a market that took North American ckd packs all 1930s GM cars in Australia look like close relatives, sometimes very distant cousins, but not sibling-twins of ours. 
Monocoque construction required massive equipment and special expertise so long after Vauxhall UK had converted to monocoque the Australian cars retained a chassis on which they could build utes and tourers and they could mix North American cars with chassis on the same lines. Anyway those Vauxhalls may look the same but they are not. See the accompanying images. 
Please note this is from the top of my head. Am I right? Eddaido (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chassis 

message: The British made Wyvern was of monocoque construction and was just a refreshed bulgy version of the all monocoque Ten - Eighteen range from before the war. Eddaido (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Wyvern

message: Any Wyvern suspension experts care to chime in? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I make no claim to expertise on Wyverns or suspension, but I remember entering a couple of lines on it - at least I think it might have been me - in the Opel Kadett entry.   But further and better particulars would indeed be welcome.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 17:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, that's really interesting. It's the first claim I've seen for pre-war use of Dubonnet (its prime time, after all) for Vauxhall / Opel. I'm presuming here (from :de:Dubonnet-Federung / English Google translation) that these are all leading links, but that this is not the reason for classing them as Dubonnet anyway, it's the "synchromous" behaviour (the comparable natural frequencies of front and read) and the springing and damping techniques to achieve it, not the mechanical layout of which way the links point. That's the opposite of the claims on the UK talk page. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Dubonnet suspension]]?
Talk:Broadway Academy

message: broadway school has two capeses yr 7 and 8 got to the little campus in aston and yr9-13 do to perry barr campus perry barr capus is being demolished as the school is going to be rubuilt 
my opinion about broadway is that it is a good school and i am happy to go their the teachers are really friendly and all of  my peers arte wellbehaved and supportive
mr skelton is an exacllent teacher and does hes best to balance out being a head teacher and being a friend to the student!
10/10 for broadway school!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.80.170.195 (talk) 14:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bain Mattox

message: Please state how this article meets wp:music criteria. MSGJ (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Just put up 3 reference links in article
128.61.63.139 (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has references but I'm not sure they qualify as reliable sources. MySpace, in particular, does not qualify. I changed the tag. Sbowers3 (talk) 02:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Al Casey (rock guitarist)

message: This article is about the same person as Al Casey (rockabilly).  Please merge any relevant content from that one to this one, update links and the disambiguation page. --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 21:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree - having two distinct articles makes no sense. Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - no reason to mess around.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Kensington Terrace

message: Surely Kensington Terrace, San Diego would be less parochial-sounding. This is an international encyclopedia.--Wetman (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The normal Wikipedia naming convention is generally to use the most straight-forward and simple title wherever possible.  At the moment, this is the only article on Wikipedia about something called "Kensington Terrace".  If another "Kensington Terrace" gets covered in the future, then it would make sense to use a longer name and to create a disambiguation page.  At the moment, the shorter name is prefered. Force10 (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Airlines

message: Ok, I saw you added the list of boxes to the airlines article which was a redirect since 2002. For starters the reason that article is a redirect is because the article airline already exists. We dont keep two versions of the same article one plural and one singular, we only keep the singular form. Second, as I said on the Article for creation page, we cant keep lists of boxes... boxes are part of wikipedia they're not a notable subject to be discussed in articles.. It is for this same reason that we also dont keep lists of aritcles.. for instance you wont find a List of wikipedia pages about planes article. I know it makes browsing easier but you have to keep in mind that wikipedia is not a search directory. You can go to the List of airlines talk page and propose a better sorting method there, but you cant posts that list at airlines, also please dont post it at list of airlines directly, discuss on the talk page first. Thanks RIP-Acer (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the IP guy.. in case you missed it at your talk page
Talk:R. R. McIan

message: I've done my best to rewrite the article from scratch.  There's obviously a few key points missing, like when did he move from Bath/Bristol to London - presumably this was eloping with Fanny, from her age it must have been in the early 1830s. Ditto the wedding date. I assume there must be a portrait of him somewhere, and it would be nice to replace the second clansman with an example of both his domestic and military paintings. Think it's important to keep the MacDonald though, as his own clan that one will have been close to his heart. It would obviously be much easier with a copy of the Morse book!!! More generally, it could do with more "art history" stuff, which is something I don't know much about. Le Deluge (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that the DNB doesn't actually say he born in Scotland; it doesn't even state that he was originally from Scotland either. It's almost like the romanticism and tartanry he helped popularise, has not only somewhat skewed our perception of the Highlanders, but has also masked the precise details of his own life! Those silly Victorians.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From memory it's fairly widely supported by the other sources though, he was described as Scottish or a Highlander by the London theatre community - although it wouldn't be the first time that someone from eg Glasgow say was assumed to be a romantic Highlander by the Sassenachs. Le Deluge (talk) 11:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I've seen Lord Macaulay described as a Highlander too. I found a ref for McIan's Scottish-birth and plugged it into the article.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Kivalliq Region

message: someone should reformat that paragraph, and probably make it into an article of its own. also the quote needs to be properly formatted, and references need to be added as appropriate. the quote itself is from a message from FreeBSD's fortune login gem, which also included the original wording of my paraphrase. If anyone knows how to / can reference ooold open source computer software, go for it. there are a few other references to this on the internet which could serve as potential references, and someone should dig up that Realist article / reference it an 'link' to it. 
Wing gundam (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weatherman's work