lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bum Phillips

message: I decided to clarify paragraph pertaining to his college coaching career. The wording implied that he was an assistant at Texas El-Paso, but he was the head coach there for one season.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.16.156.121 (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  College career 

message: How did he get the nickname, "Bum"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.136.45.91 (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The short answer: He got stung by bumblebees as a kid.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bum" 

message: He died during the big rivalry game between the two highschool teams he coached, seems too notable to not be mentioned 2603:8081:903:5BF0:90FF:35C5:9A07:9377 (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Need an “Early Life” section, before he went to Lamar! 2600:1011:B32D:BF50:79E8:4C5F:7D4F:985B (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-World War II
Talk:Anarhichadidae

message: Here would be the right place to mention it.--Mideal (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loup de mer 

message: Not sure what this refers to... Cwrwgar (talk) 08:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek genital  ?
Talk:Atlantic wolffish

message: see Talk:Blubber for q about stonebiter fat
Sorry, I'm just a noob Finn, but what does "Seawolves are inhabitants of the northern seas of both hemispheres" actually mean? Aren't northern seas of the southern hemisphere right next to the equator or does "northern seas" have some other meanings too. Or how is our planet split in this case?
:Think about which hemispheres have northern seas. It wouldn't make sense to split the globe into norther and southern hemispeheres when talking about the northern seas. It does make sense to split it into eaaasteern and western hemispehers, though... - UtherSRG (talk) 17:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Aplodactylus

message: :The name means either "single finger" or "simple finger" (Greek haploos / aploe + daktylos). [Sourced to Fishbase, depending on whether you look at Aplodactylidae or Aplodactylus-punctatus]
Answered my own question: C&V called it simple-finger, but this was obviously misunderstood, because someone later attempted to "correct" the spelling to haplodactylus. And fishbase is just one source that still hasn't figured it all out (unless the proposer of the family name really was labouring under a contrary understanding from the originators of the genus name).Cesiumfrog (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology
Talk:Aplodactylus arctidens

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Notchheaded marblefish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Crested blenny

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Mimic blenny

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Bovichtus variegatus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Atlantic pomfret

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Big-scale pomfret

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Spotted fanfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Brad Childress

message: CRITICISM SECTION:
DESPERATELY needs grammar editing.  I mean right now, this instant.  It's a disgrace and makes Wikipedia look bad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.220.129 (talk) 00:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The statement from the article that I would like to discuss:
Childress is also known to bear a striking resemblance to Major Dad star Gerald McRaney and Ned Flanders from the animated sit-com The Simpsons.
I initially removed this statement (with a detailed note in the edit summary), but User:E tac replaced it with a reference. Since it is now clearly referenced, I certainly can't remove it without a discussion. The reference, an ESPN article from April 2006, states, "Childress looks a little bit like Gerald McRaney, the lead actor in the 1990s TV sitcom, "Major Dad," and he approaches his job as if he were a Marine sergeant, too." The article does not mention any resemblence to Ned Flanders from "The Simpsons", which brings the motive of Etac into question - you added the reference to McRaney, but why did you feel the need to add your opinion?
I realize that there is a reference now, but I still do not think that this addition is of any use to this article. This is an opinion, made by one writer, and it's not an opinion that is regarding his occupation, legacy, etc. We do not routinely describe people in biographies. We do not say, "So-and-so is six feet tall, blond hair, blue eyes, looks vaguely like David Caruso...", so why should we state this here? I say remove.198.178.191.2 (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not add the thing about Ned Flanders so that should be removed, in fact I will do so now.--E tac (talk) 08:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resemblance to McRaney and Flanders

message: DESPERATELY needs grammar editing.  I mean right now, this instant.  It's a disgrace and makes Wikipedia look bad.  The comment directly below is cogent, but the grammar needs attention immediately.  Either fix it or delete the entire section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.220.129 (talk) 00:26, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw the NPOV slant as well, was curious why this discussion hasn't gone anywhere.  The lack of sources alone is warranting deletion. -- TRTX T / C 14:23, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: This should be revised to read: "Mike Shanahan are also an alumni".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stwiso (talk • contribs) 19:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike Shanahan is also an alumni

message: In the table, under the Post Season - Result column, it says "Fired(thank god for that)."  As humorous as it may be, it doesn't belong in an encyclopedic article.  It's also not accurate; he was fired during the regular season, not after the postseason.  At the risk of being branded a spoilsport, I'm going to remove the line. --Nonstopdrivel (talk) 09:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thank god for that"
Talk:Synchiropus splendidus

message: This fish is absolutely amazing! I want one ^^ 82.25.105.211 (talk) 16:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ok 

message: What do these fish have to do with LSD?  Is it just because they have psychedelic colors and images or do these fish have some sort of drug effect?Jtyroler (talk) 04:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  LSD-fish 
Talk:The Third Eye (book)

message: is it just me or did he forsee the future.  if that guy published his book in 1956, and assuming it took about a year to write it and and think of it, it would be around 1954-55 that he started writing.  the invasion of tibet was in 1959.  and its just a little weird how he knew everything about tibet, because tibet was a very isolated area back then.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.161.223.98 (talk) 02:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it just me 

message: The phrase "it bears little relation to documented Tibetan life" intrigues me. Sources? Is it verifiable under Wikipedia policy?  I understand that a private investigator found Rampa/Hoskins, but are the book's accounts of 20th century Tibetian life are innacurate? If the investigators went to Tibet (doubtful), then where's the documentation to say how Tibet really was and where the Third Eye got it wrong?  The book describes Lhasa, the Dalai Lama, prayer wheels, family life, Chinese invasion, etc.  Did the author(s) get those wrong?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertkeller (talk • contribs) 20:43, 30 June 2006
:Westerners who did have firsthand experience in Tibet, such as Heinrich Harrer (author of Seven Years in Tibet) immediately recognized the book as a fraud.  See Donald Lopez's chapter on this book in Prisoners of Shangri-la.  Entenman (talk) 23:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase "it bears little relation to documented Tibetan life" does not appear in the current version of the article. The first half of the book is quite convincing, but in the second half it introduces occult ideas not found in traditional Buddhist teaching.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing Sources
Talk:The Injury

message: The link to the Prism DuroSport website was not spam. The site in question features more information on the unique mp3 player that was featured in this episode.  Please check more carefully before removing relevant content.
:Please read your talk page. Thanks, Mrtea (talk) 02:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The wristband trivia was added because people kept pointing it out as a watch and calling it a goof. What is our policy on "non-trivia" (i.e., how to prevent people from adding bogus trivia)? -- Raymondc0 18:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dwight's Wristband
Talk:Oh! Calcutta!

message: Did it really debut off-Broadway? I was under the impression the first performances were at the Roundhouse in London. Can someone clarify? AuntFlo (talk) 03:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to have been in London after NYC, although obviously key writing took place in London – I've added something about the controversy when it opened in London (see obscenity allegations para), which is possibly why it was tested/found an open door in NYC first. But this is supposition and it would need more research. Libby norman (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Debut?
Talk:Encapsulation (networking)

message: Why does the definition require encapsulating higher layer into lower layer? AFAIK encapsulation can also be performed in the same layer, like IP over IP or in general GRE Danielcohn 20:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: It says we need to add more citations for this article, but there is no doubts about encapsulation, there is also a link that we explain it very well, even better from here--CONFIQ (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{unreferenced|date=January 2008}}</nowiki> 

message: the text and the graphic mentions UDP, yet application level examples like web are brought. maybe one should rephrase the article using TCP and leave UDP as a side note/remark?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.136.67.87 (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  strange mix of UDP and TCP in explanation
Talk:Cast recording

message: :"In recent years, some cast recordings have been recorded live, but maintaining perfect quality. This is due to theaters that contain recording studios within."
This sounds interesting, so I'm leaving it in, but what, exactly, does it mean? To mean, "recorded live" means in front of a paying audience. Is the audience told to be perfectly quiet, or does the miking technique make audience noise inaudible? Or is it recorded in the theatre (hence on a full-sized stage with the full cast in the same blocking as in a performance) but with no audience? Or what? Dpbsmith (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What exactly does this mean?

message: "With rare exceptions, one should always look to the original Broadway cast recording over later revival and studio cast recordings. Though the alternates may offer a more complete reading and often better sound, only the premiere casts who had weeks of rehearsals and try-outs to shape the performances under the watchful eyes of the authors can provide the authentic document."
This assertation has no citation and no argument to back it up. Highly POV GiosueCarr (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. AJD (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: POV of "Alternate Versions" Sections 

message: This is an encyclopedia - and we (very correctly) have a separate article for soundtrack recordings - which are sound recordings made (in theory at least) from the soundtrack of a film (or movie). Sometimes the two genres "go together" - for instance the Original Broadway Cast of the stage version of Kismet and the Original Soundtrack of the movie version of the same show have an obvious and important affinity. None the less a cast album is very specifically NOT a soundtrack!! If it was then this article wouldn't exist. And the vast majority of soundtrack albums consist of music from (and/or inspired by) films that are in no sense of the word "musicals". The two genres need to be kept distinct, even if they are (sensibly enough) brought together by (for instance) record company catalogues or CD shop owners. The fact that people sometimes confuse the two is surely all the more reason for an encyclopedia to make the different clear? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack