lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:What Kind of Fool Am I?

message: In the article "What kind of fool am I?" the song is told to conclude the FIRST act.
In the article "Stop the world, I want to get off" the song appears to con clude tha SECOND act and thus the musical itself.
I have insufficient knowledge af the musical and therefore do not presume to start editing the articles, but would like to call the attention of somebody more informed than I am to the discrepancy.
Thank you!
Jmfsf (talk) 16:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed this same discrepancy. Every source I can find lists it as the show close (end of Act II). I'm going to change it. --MelanieN (talk) 02:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article "Stop the World, I Want to Get Off" notes a 485-performance run at the Queen's Theatre in London's West End, compared to 555 in NYC on Broadway. This does not sound consistent with "after it had flopped in the UK". Can "flopped in the UK" be substantiated? Is 485 a flop in London but 555 a huge success on Broadway?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.239.35 (talk) 20:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Flop in UK?
Talk:What a Diff'rence a Day Makes

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 23:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What a Diff'rence a Day Made →  – error in title, correct name redirects to album currently Hekerui (talk) 17:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). --John Cline (talk) 00:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 December 2021 

message: The arrangement of cover versions makes no sense.  1)  Why is Esther Phillips given a whole section?  There are two important versions: the original in Spanish and the Dinah Washington in English.  All the rest is secondary.  2)  Why are minor performers given separate listings when major artists like Sarah Vaughan are lumped together in one paragraph?  Zaslav (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions
Talk:Iron Cove Creek

message: I might take some modern day images for this article from the same spot if possible. Its also a good article there should be more like this about Sydney--Ad@m.J.W.C. 08:45, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Anyone please feel free to add to this page with local knowledge and pictures. Much appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smegs07 (talk • contribs) 11:28, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 
I do know that in late 2005, Ashfield and Leichhardt Council started a cleanup operation of the Creek, and they put a rubbish trap at the mouth of the creek where it joins Iron Cove. Thats about all i know, can anyone add to that??? Nath1991 (talk) 07:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iron Cove Creek 
Talk:Rohese de Vere, Countess of Essex

message: The year of birth of Rohese is unknown, as is the month and day.  No medieval or modern source supplies that information with any specificity.  The year of her birth is deduced from the birth of her first known son and the probable birth order of her siblings.
The death date of Countess Rohese has erroneously been assumed to be in October 1166.  She was well enough to attend the funeral of her eldest son, Geoffrey de Mandeville, second earl of Essex, at Walden Abbey after his death in Chester on Oct. 21, 1166, and she witnessed a charter of her second son, William, third earl, that is firmly dated to 1170.DeAragon DeAragon 05:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth & Death

message: Although the foundation of the prejudice in inheritance is based on ancient biblical injunctions, the hard reality is that the prejudice had lapsed in the Dark Ages. For example, King William the Conqueror is generally known as William the Bastard on the Continent, and to a great extent Viking and Saxon traditions applied over a wide area of the Country, which were from a very different culture less focused on primogeniture and more on suitability, as shown in the role of the Witan. Therefore, the comment that a son of the couple was illegitimate is an anachronism, unless there is real evidence that inheritance passed elsewhere as a result. The general euphemism in such cases is, rather, "natural". In this precise instance, he was not promoted to the Earldom because he was in exile: the fact Ernulf was passed over motivates the distinctly documented grant of the Earldom to his brother, which otherwise would have been automatic.
A further aspect of this is that Ernulf is a Saxon, not a Franco-Norman name, raising a mild possibility that he was not so much born out of marriage as born to another mother. That can only be cited here, of course, because is is Original abd Undocumented thinking, and so cannot under any circumstances be included in the main meme, unless further research elucidates the issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.123.173.109 (talk) 22:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegitimacy as an objection
Talk:Secretary for Scotland

message: There was a Secretary of Scotland, commonly referred to as the Clericus Regis long before the Union of parliaments. (Some have confused this position with that of Lord Clerk Register but that is incorrect). So this article needs some re-writing to get the history correct. David Lauder 08:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. My suggestion is that the titles for these pages should be reversed. The post-Union chap was called Secretary of State for Scotland. The pre-Union fellow was called Secretary of Scotland. Regards, David Lauder 20:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Afraid that doesn't work. The post-union chap was only a Secretary of State from 1926 - from 1885 until then he was a mere Secretary for Scotland.--George Burgess 13:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your reference that the pre-1709 Secretary was "Secretary of State for Scotland". I can't find one. That is why I think the page entitled Secretary of State, Scotland is incorrectly titled, when it should be Secretary of Scotland. Regards, David Lauder 11:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:European Automobile Manufacturers Association

message: The following statement needs some expansion and further clarification to improve the article.
:One major area of ACEA work is in performance quality classifications for 4-stroke engine oils.
What is the work and what are the standards and/or classifications? There is also a section in the Motor oil article which relates to the ACEA. The detailed standards/classifications could go into that article.--TGC55 (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standards and/or Classifications? 
Talk:Communauto

message: This page's information is out of date, out of sync with the French version, and possibly incorrect (in particular I don't think the extra $500 deposit exists, plus it is possible to get a loan to cover the initial $500http://www.caissesolidaire.coop/prets/particuliers/autoeco/, or equally one can subscribe to a transit pass for a year and avoid ithttp://www.communauto.com/duo/index_ENG.html)
216.191.245.130 (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Center for Auto Safety

message: I've added the Ford Pinto recall back in as an accomplishment, reversing this edit: 14:34, 17 May 2012‎ Hatzie .... (Remove Ford Pinto reference. This defect was brought to the public attention by Mother Jones News not Nader.). The history on this is well-documented that the Center for Auto Safety submitted a petition about the Pinto defect several years before the Mother Jones article, & the CAS also resubmitted the petition after the article was published. Whomever "brought [this issue] to the public attention" isn't nearly as relevant for this Accomplishments section as is the fact that the CAS is responsible for why the Pinto recall occurred at all. Jmathis555 (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accomplishments
Talk:Charles Chilton (zoologist)

message: I removed this from the Main Page for now: "...that Charles Chilton was the first academic rector in Australasia?" According to Saint Ignatius' College, Riverview, Joseph Dalton became rector of a college, which would apparently make him an "academic rector", in 1878, at Riverview, New South Wales, Australia. According to this article's third reference , Chilton first became a rector after his marriage in 1888. Maybe it meant "first rector" in a more restricted sense, such as first rector of Canterbury College. If I am correct, this article needs some editing as well. Art LaPella 17:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I expect the author of the source meant it to be restricted to higher education, thus excluding Joseph Dalton's rectorship over a high school. Schools are not normally understood to have rectors, while universities are. --Stemonitis 07:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First academic rector
Talk:Fiat 500 "Topolino"

message: I have never heard this: Mickey Mouse appeared for the first time in Italy in 1930, so it might have influenced the popular name of this car. Nevertheless, I've always thought it was called topolino since its front end recalled a small mouse head. Without any reliable reference, it should be deleted.--Carnby (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found this reference (in Italian); not very reliable, but at least someone who support this idea exists.--Carnby (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiat Topolino after Mickey Mouse? 

message: The article talks about the cost of the car in lires, but it's a rather meaningless number as the lire no longer exist.  Can a knowledgeable person do an equivalence value in euros or USD in the article please? 98.203.247.11 (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value of Lire? 

message: "The 500 A is known to be hot rodded, once the car came to America. It was mostly hot rodded to a dragster, or a street rod."
Could someone please rewrite this horrid sentence ? I can't bear to read it again. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:588:B73F:BF7B:F130 (talk) 10:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please rewrite... 

message: Going back in Italy every years or almost, on the road I counted the topolinos. It was a car kid game to pass the long travel back home. My father explained to me, we call it "topolino", it's the italian name of Mickey. I love that car, it remember me of my youth and is an italian design icone for us Italians. The term "italian citycar" bothers me, because, not unlike the Volkswagen, it was known as a popular car, meant, as Ford projected too, to have a car cheep available to the commoners. It was declined in utilitary to for small business in a country who was finaly joining the industrial revolution almost a century after the english. The market target was not the urban people, it was the ones who couldn't aford more. The "citycar" is a end of 20's century concept, emerging in japan against big american cars in crowded Tokyo. conceptualised far later than the topolino all around the world, like the swiss Smart Fortwo and it's innovatinve concept car design for its time, for exemple. Not like cities had problem for finding parking or to much car on the road in the poor Italy of the 1930's. That's a rich problem.
Need a reference? google what I said, I lived it not road it.
I love that talk option.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Androolid (talk • contribs) 20:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Count the Topolino.
Talk:Packard One-Ten

message: This article's last sentence reads For 1942, Packard made a decision to retain numerical designated models within its senior line and the One-Ten reverted back to being called Packard Six.
Uh, huh? I take it this says that the 1942 Six was NOT called "One-Ten", not being part of the "senior line".  But, if "One-Ten" was not applied to 1942 models, why are we shown an illustration of a "1942 One-Ten"? Who is wrong—Beverly R Kimes, author of the sole reference listed (not cited); and/or the WP contributor and/or the judge of the concours d'élégance award worn by this vehicle which the owner describes as a "Packard Custom"? Can someone in the know make this a little clearer for me, please? Cheers Bjenks (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Having it both ways?
Talk:Rolls-Royce Wraith (1938)

message: This page needs to be restructured to better reflect the two totally different models of the same name from different eras.  Possibly, the page should be split, maybe with a short page about the model name, with split to a page each for each vintage. At least there needs to be a page which deals with the current model, while acknowledging its heritage.
Enquire (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this article should be split into two separate articles. There is no direct relationship between the two cars - they were made by two different companies. The company that manufactured the 1938 Wraith is now called Bentley Motors Limited and is owned by Volkswagen Group. The 2013 cars is manufactured by Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Limited, a company that was created new by BMW Group in 1998 and is not related to or a successor of today's Bentley Motors Limited or its predecessors. The 2013 car can not rightly be called a second generation of the 1938 car because they vehicles were manufactured by two different companies. The Phantom has separate articles named by model years to account for this unusual Bentley/RR situation. 174.21.245.82 (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please split into two articles, see also here:,  --Coffins (talk) 11:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 model vs. 1938 to 1939 model 

message: So apparently the top speed for the new Wraith is about 204 mph. None of the sources given in this article mention it, though. Has RR issued an official top speed figure? --98.246.156.76 (talk) 05:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 model top speed 

message: The standard hood ornament for the Wraith was the kneeling version, right? It was also the first RR of several models to carry that hood ornament. Would the standing version seen in the 2nd photo in the article be aftermarket, then? --2600:100F:B021:AE45:0:45:CCBF:A101 (talk) 00:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hood ornament?
Talk:BMW 303

message: The article BMW 315 is basically a series of stubs about the 315, the 315/1, the later 319 and 319/1, and the final development, the 329.
However, according to the article content, and as far as my knowledge of the sources extends, the 315 does not differ from the 303 any more substantially than the 319 differs from the 315, nor, in fact, any more substantially than the 319 differs from the 303.
Since all the variants listed in the 315 article, including the 315 itself, are based on the 303's platform, it is proposed that the articles be merged as a more complete history of the 303 platform.
Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 18:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I will assume that silence gives consent. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: BMW 315 into BMW 303
Talk:Fiat 2800

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  01:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Standard (1933 automobile)

message: The 1950's car was not called Standard, but Gutbrod.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.94.21 (talk) 12:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are more articles on Wikipedia covering this same subject. Ie Gutbrod, this Standard (1933 automobile) and Standard Superior, they could all be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.94.21 (talk) 11:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1950 car
Talk:Elcar

message: "it ended after he was shot dead" .... but no-one's been named, except for a supplier of a very small number of engines in a previous sentence describing something probably completely unconnected. So who's been shot, and what was their importance?
:I think I've cracked it; there's a reference to "El-Fay taxicabs", which were named for Larry Fay, a clubowner in New York, according to this reference from Google books. Larry Fay was shot dead, according to this. Voila! -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who?
Talk:Three window coupe

message: I wanted "commonly just 'three-window'" to mean to mean "coupé" is usually dropped in referring to them, but I'm not sure that came through...  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  22:35, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Von Dutch's rear window? 

message: I propose that Three window coupe be merged into Coupé, so that it can be included alongside the other types of coupé. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:High-performance vehicle

message: This article is very poorly written, in that uses no citations or references and relies on unfounded suppositions.  842U (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Little or perhaps even no useful content, topic covered elsewhere. But lots of incoming links. I've redirected to performance car . Andrewa (talk) 19:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: weasel words
Talk:Car model

message: I think that we must separate the concept of trim level from car model. A car model has the same body but may have different trims. I propose to merge this Car model article with the Body style and/or Brand or marque articles, and to merge Trim level with the Trim packages article. Aldo L (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate the concept of trim level from car model

message: I expanded the article focusing in the engineering point of view for defining the concept of car model. Maybe, now the merger could go directly to Automaker, or it could continue to be a stand-alone article. The Body style and Trim package articles link to this article and that could be sufficient for them. Aldo L (talk) 02:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Engineering point of view for defining the concept of car model

message: As the cleanup tag notes, none of this material is verifiable; the only inline citations are to Car and Driver (or similar) pages that show an example of the car/idea mentioned in the text. There is not a single reference given to any idea appearing in this article. It is another example of another "just trust us" article, that violates WP:OR and WP:VERIFY. Le Prof.  71.239.87.100 (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Please, no more WP policy violations at this article
Talk:Cold inflation pressure

message: This article is WRONG.  It does not take into account atmospheric pressure.  From physics, the ideal gas law says that PV=nRT where  P is absolute pressure and T is absolute temperature (Kelvin).  V is the volume and is assumed to be relatively constant.  nR is constant.   To understand this, assume the tire was filled when it was 300 degrees Kelvin or 80 degrees Fahrenheit.  If the temperature varies 10%, i.e. 30 degrees Kelvin (also 30 degrees Celsius)  the pressure varies 10%.   So if the tire was filled at 80F to 32 psi (or 47 psi absolute when we add atmospheric pressur), the change would be 4.7 psi or .16 psi per degree Celsius or .1 psi per degree Fahrenheit or 1 psi for every 10 Fahrenheit degrees.
This article predicts .6 psi for every 10 Fahrenheit degrees.  The actual number is 1 psi for every 10 Fahrenheit degrees.
This is physicist, Stephen Henning, retired from AT&T Bell Labs.  I can work up a correct article at a later date.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhodyman (talk • contribs) 15:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Combination car (ambulance)

message: Can anyone tell? George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many similarities and wagons were probably used as hearses somewhere but there are also many differences. Ambulances require a high roof line for the nurse/paramedic to able to sit upright while taking care of the patient - wagon rooflines are generally too low. Hearses tend to be based on luxury cars (want a nice car for the last ride) and wagons were more likely to be made in low to mid level trim grades. And then wagons went out of fashion and stopped being produced. So these factors pointed the industry to taking a large luxury sedan, ripping the roof and back end off, stretching it and adding a full length high roof.  Stepho  talk  01:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to Station Wagons?
Talk:Gross vehicle weight rating

message: Should maximum weight without a commercial drivers license and maximum weight without an oversize load permit be discussed? Triskele Jim 17:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Other weight threshholds

message: Under the section "United States", shouldn't the following line "Vehicles over the 8,500 lb threshold are required to have insurance under Section 387.303 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980." instead read "Commercial vehicles over 8,500 lb threshold are required to have insurance under Section 387.303 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980."?
I drive a Ford F-450 DWL with a GVWR of 14,500 lbs. It is a class 4 medium duty truck. I use it to pull my 5th wheel camper. I am not required to carry insurance based on the Motor Carrier Act of 1980 because the vehicle is used for uses "other than commercial".Wsshuey (talk) 00:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Wide open throttle

message: I really think it's unnecessary to have a separate article for this subject, and I think it should be merged into the Throttle article. Darkest tree (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ten years on and I agree.  I'll wait and see if I can stir up any more interest here before merging.  Lithopsian (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A separate article for this topic is not necessary
Talk:Wheel alignment

message: "All new vehicles leave the factory with their alignment checked and adjusted". "A major national fuel savings program could be seen by correctly inflated tires". "The typical alignment on an economy sedan takes about an hour under ideal circumstances". "A good start is to consult your local licensed automotive technician". "Wheel alignment, sometimes referred to as breaking or tracking". These are examples of non-global text in this article. 115.64.159.41 (talk) 06:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: You proposed a merge, but did not open a discussion of the merge. So I will.
* Support redirect, but oppose merge, as there is no viable content at Laser wheel alignment that is not already contained in this article. The only difference between the two is the fact that one might use lasers to perform the wheel alignment (implied from the title) but no details and no sources are provided to indicate how the laser alignment might differ from the standard alignment. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:Laser wheel alignment]] to this article