lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Power door locks

message: I saw the request for an image (Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles/Requested images) but I am unsure of what to include in the image. I could get a picture of a car lights flashing to as the button on the key is pressed, indicating that the doors are now unlocked. James086 Talk | Contribs 14:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Some older cars, notably the Jaguar XJ6 Series II or higher trim levels of the XE Ford Falcon used a rocker or toggle switch on the console or driver's door armrest to activate the central locking system. This contrasts to the common modern method of one using the key or inside locking button in the driver's door for the same purpose. Such systems appeared to be complicated to operate, with one using separate controls to lock all doors of the vehicle. This method was disapproved of by the motoring press because the driver couldn't just use the key once to make sure all vehicle doors were locked.
SimonMackay (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Power door locking methods

message: I am under the impression that there existed some mechanical central locking systems. If so, shouldn't it be more appropriate to have the article as "central locking" instead or "Power door locks", which limits the range to electrical systems only? --Dead3y3 (talk) 08:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central locking is of electrical nature only? 

message: Simple descriptions of car locks mention a motor within the lock assembly that locks and unlocks the lock.   But my Volvo V70 has 2 motors within each lock assembly.   What does the other motor do?   Perhaps this very short article can be expanded to include a section about how they work in practice?   FreeFlow99 (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How the locks work?
Talk:Vulvar cancer

message: Hello all! I am a UC San Francisco medical student and future Ob/Gyn. I am currently taking a course with some classmates that introduces us to and involves us in WikiProject Medicine, so I will be editing the Vulvar Cancer article over the next month or so. My main goals are to increase the article's readability for the general public while also adding some up-to-date, new content for the medical student/professional reading the article. Feel free to give feedback, etc!
--EricaNM (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Editor 

message: Venus Appeal covers 4 of the major gynaecological cancers
Womb (Endometrial) Cancer
Cervical Cancer
Vulval Cancer
Ovarian Cancer
The Venus Appeal was set up to give information, advice and 
to educate people with regards to the 4 of the major 'down there' cancers
"Be aware of what's down there"
See www.venusappeal.org
for more information
User:JJemkay 16:11, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venus Appeal 

message: I am writing in the hopes that the editors here might consider adding our website to your resources page for Vulvar/Vaginal Cancers. We are an on-line support group for women afflicted with this type of rare disease. Many women do not have access to a support group where they reside, so they turn to the Internet in the hopes of finding others going through the same thing. We have been up and running since 2001, we have almost 400 members and unfortunately we are finding more and more women are in need of support each day. I think many women researching "Vulvar Cancer" are probably newly diagnosed, or know someone who is, and are in need of support.
I appreciate your time and consideration. Regards, Melissa 
Our main site: http://www.womenconqueringcancer.org
Our support group: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/WomenConqueringCancer/
:This website is no longer active. Barbara (WVS) ✐  ✉  07:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulvar/Vaginal Cancer Support Group 
Talk:The Saragossa Manuscript (film)

message: There is also a recent digital reconstruction by The Chimney Pot and the Polish Institute of Film. --Error (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital reconstruction
Talk:A Short Film About Killing

message: Editing Sections
Style
Themes
Production
Reception 
Differences with Decalogue V
Bibliography
Eidsvik, Charles (Fall, 1990) ‘Keislowski’s Short Films’ in Film Quarterly. Found here: http://www.petey.com/kk/docs/shorts1.txt Pp.95 pp.191
Falkowska, J. (winter, 1995). "The Political in the Films of Andrzej Wajda and Krzysztof Kieslowski. Cinema journal . 34 (2), pp.37-50.
Haltof, Marek (2004) the cinema of Krzysztof Kieślowski: variations on destiny and chance (London: Wallflower Press)
Insdorf, Annette (1999) Double Lives, Second Chances: The Cinema of Krzysztof Keiślowski (New York: Hyperion). Pp.95 pp.191  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emma1989 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Sim Lim Square

message: Certainly not in an encyclopedic tone but definitely provided some good advice for my next trip to Sim Lim Square! Bactoid (talk) 12:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: This edit removed useful information on Sim Lim Square scam tactics and added manic and comic sales pitch. 
For the record, this is the current version after reverting the cover-up.--Palaeoviatalk 03:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countering effort to remove information on Sim Lim Square scams 

message: I posted the following message on User talk:203.117.153.170
Sim Lim Square 
Kindly refrain from deleting existing Talk page content. This is considered vandalism.
Please discuss in Talk page your reason for deleting information on scam tactics used by Sim Lim Square shops.
Many editors have contributed to the Sim Lim Square page with such useful contents. Please respect the effort of previous editors.
If you are trying to hide Sim Lim Square's notoriety, please stop.--Palaeoviatalk 06:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, User:203.117.153.170 has today been blocked by an administrator for 72 hours after again erasing the "scam tactics" section of the Sim Lim Square article, removing existing content of this Talk page, and repeatedly issuing threats (such as "Scammers/Unauthorised Editors are being tracked for defamation and shall be liable accordingly by the Singapore Law", "Wikipedia Legal Team to Assist to identify Spammers / Defamation Registered Users of Wikipedia" [which are lies]).--Palaeoviatalk 05:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempt to delete information on Scam Tactics 

message: I have been trying to put the message across to all tourists about the advisory being published by CASE(Consumer Association of Singapore) for avoiding rogue shops in Sim Lim Square. User Sni56996 is repeatedly deleting it without any solid reasons.
Can anybody take actions and bar such users from deleting the contributions others make please.
Ref : http://www.case.org.sg/consumer_alerts.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverline on darkcloud (talk • contribs) 09:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attemp to delete useful information for Tourists against scammers 

message: While I agree that the information about scams is important, I think that the article focuses too much on this. I think that the section could be condensed down, but I don't want to be seen as removing it entirely, had I done this. Should this be done? 58.182.109.215 (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much focus on scams
Talk:Rectrices

message: Is it "rectrix" or "retrix" (as in retrices)? I always thought it was the former, but more recently have found that the latter seems to be the version preferred by ornithologists, but I am not certain at all as both appear in the scientific literature. Dysmorodrepanis 15:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I propose that several existing stub articles -- Remiges, Rectrices, and Pinion (and all their various redirects) -- be pointed to this article instead.  This would have the dual purpose of eliminating several stub articles while also giving readers a more complete overview of the subject.  MeegsC | Talk 09:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of various flight feather stubs
Talk:Sea Point

message: I could only think of Antony Sher but I'm fairly certain there must be several other people to add to this list.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Unspin (talk • contribs) 17:05, 18 October 2006
These were in the notable people section but do not have their own wiki entries. We need more consensus over who to include so that it isn't just promotion. 
* Ben Trovato satirist, columnist
* Kevin Atkinson, artist
* Hein Wicht, writer (Hein's family home was "Spieka" at 3 Victoria rd which was named after the German village his great grandfather emigrated from, built in Victorian style and gifted by his grandfather to his father. Grandfather owned older "Mermaid Cottage" which was later re christened "Rapallo". An apartment block of the same name now occupies the space in Beach road, Sea Point.)
* Allison Foat ballerina turned publicist and travel journalist
Teatreez (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous People

message: I changed Indian Ocean to False Bay, as although False Bay is popularly referred to as being part of the Indian Ocean, the more generally accepted division between the Atlantic and Indian Oceans is at Cape Aghulas. Booshank (talk) 19:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Ocean > False Bay
Talk:Océan-class ship of the line

message: What is the source of the information on this page, please?
: Several pages scattered here and there, notably ,  and . But you find lots of details scattered all over the Internet. There must be serious books on the subject somewhere, also... Rama 16:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It's difficult to find comprehensive reliable information from this period expect for Britain. One interesting thing I found online was a photograph of a French ship of the line from around 1860, one of the last few built, possible Louis XI or a similar name, but I can't find it again! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SpookyMulder (talk • contribs) 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Interstate 520

message: Will parts or segments of I-520 be part of I-3 and/or I-14?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1005:B014:2542:CC54:396:88B:139 (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not known at this time. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 3 and 14
Talk:Georgia State Route 316

message: Has Sugarloaf Parkway been extended to SR 316? If so, should be noted in article. --Chaswmsday (talk) 01:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sugarloaf Parkway]] 

message: According to this website (https://transformingsr316-gdot.hub.arcgis.com/) there are more intersections of SR 316 to become interchanges, including SR 316’s eastern terminus. This article needs to be updated. 69.1.59.248 (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Intersections To Become Interchanges 

message: I found an article talk about SR 316 extension. 
https://books.google.com/books?id=ksE1AQAAMAAJ&pg=RA2-PA66&lpg=RA2-PA66&dq=us+78&source=bl&ots=MSRrq2Rr17&sig=ACfU3U1Sf4A9ZJG1FJGQiqZsdjx8oQvL0g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiyr6a2x7CGAxXz6ckDHeKCC3I4HhDoAXoECAYQAw#v=onepage&q=us%2078&f=false 69.1.59.248 (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension
Talk:Georgia State Route 141

message: Road names (as added in See Also section) should be included in prose. --Chaswmsday (talk) 02:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road names 

message: I propose we should merge Peachtree Industrial Boulevard into this article, as there is significant overlap. Some of the information in PIB is suspect (i.e. the claimed termini), but its junction list is more robust. A potential roadblock to a merge is the fact that PIB continues beyond the SR 140/Jimmy Carter Blvd split into SR 141/Peachtree Pkwy and PIB. At the very least, the information contained could/should be combined or sync'ed. --Chaswmsday (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: A fairly extensive article on Peachtree Industrial Boulevard was redirected here per the merge outcome of an Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussion. Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Particularly, the interchange details for the controlled-access portion of the route may be found at . (I did have doubts, though, about some of the junctions being described as "diamond interchanges" when there is in fact, a frontage road system.) --Chaswmsday (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Peachtree Industrial Boulevard]]
Talk:AOL Explorer

message: This article reads like it was written from someone from AOL. I've reworded a few passages to make it sound more npov, and rewrote the title of "praise" to "Critical reception". But that section only contains positive responses. There are no negative ones. The lack of sources is also a problem.--wL<speak·check> 22:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've cleaned up the Reception section and removed the obvious POV. If anyone objects, feel free to add the tag back and discuss any possible improvements here. --Android Mouse 04:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute 

message: Am I mistaken, or is AOL no longer distributing this program? The link to the download page goes to something about downloading IE8 and aol toolbar stuff. http://browser.cdn.aol.com/customie8/aol/download.html 70.247.168.40 (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  obsolete? 

message: Now there is AOL Explorer Gold at https://help.aol.com/ saying how to have AOL help with reduced employee help because of COVID-19.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AOL Explorer Gold
Talk:Mitsuyasu Maeno

message: According to jawp article, he was born in 1946 as Mitsuyasu. His acting name was Soichiro (霜一郎, which is misread as Shimoichiro in this article).219.104.87.103 (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.218.180.212.7 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitsuyasu is his born name
Talk:Raised floor

message: The first sentence mentions "server racks, or desks in landscaped office areas." Not clear why these things would ever be put beneath a raised floor, and if they are on TOP of the floor, then that should be clarified, if relevant.  Lupinelawyer 15:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article never mentions overhead systems or ceilings or within wall systems that I can see. Extra citations never harm if you have some comparing things or saying anything about it. Dmcq (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose merging Raised Access Computer Floor into this page, as they are two terms for the same system. Raised Access Computer floor has less content and is a more specific term, so it seems to fall nicely under the more inclusive umbrella of Raised floor. Adabhael (talk) 18:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Support yes I fully agree. I can't see any point in having both and there seems litle in the way of extra useful information in the other article to carry over. Dmcq (talk) 21:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Dmcq I went ahead and did the merge I hope I got all the steps right, although there is something odd going on with the from_oldid in the copied template. AdabhaelTalk 19:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed those - they require the full url. Dmcq (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ichikawa Raizō VIII

message: Translated the majority of the article text from the Japanese page as found on February 11, 2017. I've never done any significant editing on Wikipedia and I hope that all of the citations are good enough.
I kept the Japanese kanji versions of Raizō's adopted fathers' names, as they may be of interest, particularly Jukai's which shares characters with the Kotobuki Ebi crest. If anything needs to be changed in terms of name formatting, please advise.  TheSporkWithin (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated 

message: This article claims that Ichikawa was in the first Zatoichi film with Shintaro Katsu.  I believe this is false, but I may be wrong.  I will watch the film again to check.  Ichikawa and Katsu did star together in a film called Hakuoki () in 1959 (released abroad as Samurai Vendetta). --HanzoTheRazor 00:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zatoichi? 
Talk:Oxazines

message: Can you tell me a few aplications for 1,2-oxazines? thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.103.86.119 (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1,2 oxazine 

message: === Grammar and content ===
This paragraph is not written in English.  The words are English, but the grammar is not; there appears to be missing words and/or punctuation.  It appears to refer to images that have not been included; for example, "Thus, structure c is a 1,4-benzoxazine."
=== Reference ===
I assume that the linked article "Benzoxazine bio-based coupling agents" on the elmira website is the source for the information included on benzoxazines.  Editing the URL to delete ".html" removed the error message that I received when following the link.  However, the case study text is missing (select any of the other case studies and there is a page of text; select the benzoxazine study and ... whiteness...).  If I could access the case study, I'd be happy to edit this article.  YMMV.
AJTH (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benzoxazine 

message: I assume that the linked article "Benzoxazine bio-based coupling agents" on the elmira website is the source for the information included on benzoxazines.  Editing the URL to delete ".html" removed the error message that I received when following the link.  However, the case study text is missing (select any of the other case studies and there is a page of text; select the benzoxazine study and ... whiteness...).  If I could access the case study, I'd be happy to edit this article.  YMMV.
AJTH (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: I have removed this sole copyvio from . --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: Not mentioned in article. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 00:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "phenoxazone" redirect here?
Talk:Sagtikos State Parkway

message: The original configuration of the Pilgrim State Hospital/Suffolk CR 13 interchange can still be found here. And I still remember old road maps showing a northbound Exit S1 ramp to Long Island Motor Parkway. ----DanTD (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You get me a more reliable source and not one from your head, I'll reconsider adding it back. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 04:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If and when I ever find the maps where I saw that, I will. The source I've got for the Pilgrim State/Crooked Hill interchange doesn't have anything between 1953 and 1966, sadly. ----DanTD (talk) 14:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older versions of interchanges
Talk:Top Shop

message: Now, despite the fact that I agree completely, I feel that this article is a little opinionated. However, I don't quite feel qualified to clean it up myself, could someone take care of this? Zeotronic 10:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinionated 

message: While Monopoly is an appropriate comparison point for the game, I think that the article goes too far with the comparisons, one line specifically bothers me:
"In addition to its modified game play..."
That line suggests that the game is merely a variation of another game, Monopoly, if your following the article. I wouldn't call the games THAT similar... Top Shop shares similar concepts to Monopoly, but calling it a modification unless comparing it to an even similar game seems inaccurate. Zeotronic (talk) 02:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monopoly contrasts
Talk:Julian and Basilissa

message: There is a move request at Talk:Julian_the_Apostate#Requested_move_2 to move Julian the Apostate to Julian. Since this involves the question whether that Emperor is the primary (much more used than any other) meaning of Julian, the views of watchers of this page would be welcome. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move notification
Talk:Nottingham Canal

message: Dear Chevin
I understand how it should read now
Yours Faithfully Martin Cordon Martin Cordon 15:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's cool Chevin 18:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misread

message: I have assessed the article against the criteria for B class listed below.
* Suitably referenced, with inline citations
* Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
* Defined structure, with adequate lead
* Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
* Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
* Appropriately understandable
It appears to pass on all counts, so I am uprating it to B class. Bob1960evens (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I am coming to this a new, after doing a few photos while doing an adventure with the grandson. Surely the lead needs pruning? How does Beeston relate? How much is in water? Where did the canal museum go? When did the River Leen become the Tinkers Leen and where? On the diagram- what's the long straight blue line to the left? Is anyone interested in a Nottingham Wiki-meetup in February? Weekend or during the week? Where- The Samuel Hall in Sherwood is a bit far out for those using the NET, Canal,or Train? --ClemRutter (talk) 18:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've addressed some of those points. If you have any comments, I'd appreciate them. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 13:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh eyes
Talk:Northholm Grammar School

message: The school is located in fiddletown as listed by street directories and maps, government services (police, Ambulance, Fire departement) and by the local area. 
dont have it listed when it's in Arcadia when its really in fiddletown
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.233.161.57 (talk) 08:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: hi chinese 
زرضفشششطصصصصصصصصصص
124.184.233.152 (talk) 05:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not clear what changes you wish to be made to the article. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 06:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2015
Talk:Chola government

message: A more experienced editor might want to look over this page.  There seems to be a bit of first person perspective throughout the page, especially in the beginning. --DWolf2k2 15:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which parts do you find problematic? - Parthi talk/contribs 19:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)