lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Breeze (New Zealand radio station)

message: Cheesy and advertorial, needs work on NPOVNankai 02:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed update as Breeze no longer on 107.1 FM at 30 May 2020.  It is not supported by the broadcaster's website listingThe Breeze frequency listing and editor has not cited an alternative source.  Also, the Wayback Machine archive doesn't record in recent years.
101.100.130.65 (talk) 02:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  107.1 Gisborne reverted 

message: Changes made 15/05/2021 are not supported by the broadcaster website listings and in some cases not supported by the RSM licence database.  The editor has not cited any sources.  The following have been unwound:
* 97.2 Northland: deleted
* 95.7 Gisborne: deleted, programme is Turanga FM
*100.5 Darfield: deleted and reinstated Lyttelton
* 92.3 South Canterbury: reinstated
101.100.130.49 (talk) 07:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 15/05/2021 Reverted 

message: The updates made 1/09/2021 for 97.2 and 91.7 have been reverted as they are not supported by broadcaster website listings and/or the NZ Reister of Radio frequencies.  The editor has not cited any sources to support the updates.
101.100.130.195 (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted Changes Made 01/09/2021
Talk:Stokes mortar

message: Several other sources give a calibre of 76.2 mm, the same as its designation. Is there a source for the stated calibre of 81.2 mm? 72.66.50.42 (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The measurement 81 mm given for the bomb held by the Australian War Memorial ( http://cas.awm.gov.au ). I have also had this confirmed by people in possession of 3 other bombs, all are 81 mm. See  http://1914-1918.invisionzone.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=100707&st=0&#entry946152 and http://www.bocn.co.uk/vbforum/stockes-pre-1918-t13202.html  . The "76.2 mm" you find quoted are just 3 inches translated to metric, by people who assume that the 3-inch in the name is to be taken literally. Rcbutcher (talk) 01:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calibre? 

message: Given the original, unstabilized projectiles, how accurate a weapon was the Stokes mortar?--172.190.46.188 (talk) 04:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: Did Stokes really get "royalties of £1 per Stokes mortar shell produced"?.  This seems like a boat load of moolah even for such a nifty weapon. An average factory worker's wages were less than a couple of quid a week even in 1918.  If he was getting this kind of money Stokes would have been very wealthy by the end of the war. Silent Billy (talk) 05:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite impossible. According to the Weapons of the Trench War, 1914-1918 p. 159, Stokes bomb cost 2£, so 50% of royalties is way to high - and he would get ca. 15 mln pounds by the end of the war. Possibly he got £1 for a mortar tube, which would make him quite wealthy anyway (15 000 £ was a lot of money in 1918). Deleted the info, pending solid sources--Felis domestica (talk) 09:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflated Rewards 

message: The article currently says when the weapon was designed and when it was rejected by the army. Missing is the info when it was first tested in the field, or when it was distributed en masse.
For example it would be interesting to know whether it was already used in the Gallipoli Campaign or in the Battle of Loos. --BjKa (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Action 

message: I was just wondering why the article is in past tense if there are still surviving Stokes mortars. I thought you could only use past tense once there aren't any surviving examples left. NamelessLameless (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense 

message: Stokes Mortar was produced in Poland as Wz.18 Mortar
http://www.1939.pl/uzbrojenie/polskie/artyleria/m_81mm_wz18_31_1928/index.html WWIIEnjoyer (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wz.18 Mortar
Talk:7.58 cm Minenwerfer

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 7.58 cm Minenwerfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060324011717/http://www.landships.freeservers.com/adh_germart1_l-mortars.htm to http://www.landships.freeservers.com/adh_germart1_l-mortars.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Angerfist

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Danny Masseling and leaving Angerfist as a redirect to the new page? I would like to open this up for discussion. --Credema 02:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlikely; the main name he's known through is Angerfist, plus Angerfist is more of an act-name, considering that the live crew consists of many. // Gargaj 14:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Danny Masseling 

message: I think we should add something about all the fake songs that people claim are by angerfist. Like terror of my speedcore/spook/ubermensch etc...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.206.5 (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do that if you want; though I think Terror Of My Speedcore is by Angerfist, but more specifically a mix (like Megamix) rather than an actual track. Correct me if I'm wrong. – NuclearDuckie (talk) 14:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I'm 3 years late, but I'd like to point out Terror of My Speedcore is probably not official, he wouldn't unprofessionally mix some tracks that are high-pitched like that. On a side note, I made my own version of that mix, which I entitled Terror of my Speedcore 2.0 - whoever is reading this, check it out if you can.  --- ☣ Hardstylehunt3r (talk)(contribs) 14:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note about "fake" tracks 

message: This isn't written like an encyclopedia entry, it's written like a movie trailer.  It is also devoid of references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.32.156 (talk) 19:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite Career Section 

message: Was this translated from Dutch using Google Translate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.253.84.106 (talk) 09:37, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I massively edited the article now and also noticed that it looked a badly translated copy from the Dutch Wikipedia. I think I fixed most of the mistakes, besides adding a new image, more links and fixing/enhancing the infobox. --- ☣ Hardstylehunt3r (talk)(contribs) 14:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad English
Talk:MSBA

message: ----
I realize that there are many articles MSBA could point to on enWP. The acronym should, in my opinion at least, redirect to the most appropriate article. While the MTA Long Island Bus might be important, both the Minnesota and Maryland State Bar Associations, among many others, also use the acronym. I pointed MSBA to the article on the Minnesota State Bar Association because it is arguably the most prominent entry in enWP that uses the acronym. If an article is uploaded on the Maryland State Bar Association, we might consider pointing MSBA at that, though the MN association is older and no less prominent than the Maryland assn. pkoden 02:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ella Shields

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I've found Ella Shields's entry in the "Who's Who of British Music Hall" reproduced at this URL:
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/THEATRE-UK/2001-08/0998118660 .
Someone should use the information from there to improve this article -- MatthewWilcox (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information
Talk:Georg Kreisler

message: I added the infobox, source is the german article, but no direct translation was made. greets, --85.127.137.136 (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: It may be interesting to readers to understand that although the subject matter of several of the songs alleged to have been copied from other artists is the same, neither the music nor the lyrics are.  By way of example, although Kreisler's "Tauben vergiften in Park" shares the same humorous theme with Tom Lehrer's "Poisoning Pigeons in the Park" (i.e., the juxtaposition of the arrival of a beautiful spring day with an invitation to spend it poisoning pigeons in the park), both the music and the lyrics are quite different -- Lehrer's has a darker tone to it, while Kreisler's is happy and carefree (both using the tone to emphasize the humorous disparity between the spring day and the morbid subject).  It's a bit like the two films, "Fail Safe" and "Dr. Strangelove", both of which take the same premise (disruption in the system leads to a possible nuclear war), with one taking it seriously and the other turning it into sardonic comedy.  Both are masterpieces.213.137.177.242 (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of copying 
Talk:Energy and society

message: Can anybody explain me how this articles reached B-status? There is no definition of the subject. The subject itself is not proper, there is no such notion as "Energy (society)". There is no dicussion to this page. Is look as a part of another article that had been thrown away. I think it is. Yes, no doubt. It has been born with 12K. A piece thrown away from somewhere.  HolIgor (talk) 19:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your correct. If you find an incorrect rating elsewhere, just make the change yourself in the future. - Shiftchange (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Hello. I am really not ease with the current redirection of Energy and society towards energy industry as they are completely different topics. I would suggest a totally new article for energy and society based on recent advances of research on this field. Thanks. See discussion on "Energy industry" talk page. Ledjazz (talk) 10:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion of a completely new article
Talk:MFA Oil

message: I screwed up the move from 'MFA oil' to 'MFA Oil', but I think I have it right now. HornColumbia
I removed the notability requirements tag added by United Statesian.  The company easily meets WP:CORP standards.  Not to mention that is is only a stub or that it is included in three separate projects. HornColumbia (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm not sure I agree with the orphan tag here.  See Wikipedia:Orphan.  We have more than three links here not including redirects and non-article space pages.   We could, of course, use more links though. HornColumbia (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.mfaoil.com/aboutus/abriefhistory. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 01:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Citizen Kate

message: You should seriously cut down on the external links. number29(Talk) 09:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect #29 was referring to the links scattered throughout the text, particularly the links in the "Other notable facts" section. Try using the ones you can format as references and dropping the essential others to the "External links" section. --Evb-wiki 23:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Treasure Island Music Festival

message: This page should be named "Treasure Island Music Festival" and should probably have a redirect when you type in "Treasure Island Festival." If someone could share how to do this, I would appreciate it.Apolloae 03:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title

message: Please do not delete this page, the last one I created was downright bad because I just wanted to get it started, and it was quickly and correctly marked as spam. This festival has not occurred yet, however is not spam and I wished to create it to allow others who know more about it to add to it without having to create the entire page. I have added appropriate information to make it informative, and the page will no doubt develop as the event nears.Apolloae 03:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not mark for deletion
Talk:Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor

message: Should this page include 1-Deoxynojirimycin, or am I wrong in thinking that's a glucosidase inhibitor?
The reason I ask is that it's an OTC product, and people should be aware of its effects and side effects.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.143.214 (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is.   I came here looking for exactly that information.  No adverse effects were seen in that study, but it's small. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Jack C. Hays High School

message: Since when does the county dictate rules to a school district in Texas.  I am pretty sure the school district banned the flag at official functions, not the county.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.91.191 (talk) 13:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kermes (dye)

message: Mordants -- chemicals added to the dye bath or applied before dying to the textile fibers with the aim of causing the dye to bind more firmly to the fiber-- affect the color of vegetable dyes. That is, the same vegetable dye, used on two samples of the same type of fiber, but with each sample treated with a different mordant, will often result in markedly different final shades. I mention this because the photo of the wool(?) dyed with kermes in the main article shows a quite light shade and one is not sure if this means a mordant was not used at all,or if it was one giving a particularly light shade. Perhaps other mordants would give a darker shade of red with kermes? It may be appropriate to include a range of photos showing this, as well as notes on each photo documenting what mordant, if any, was used. I am not familiar with kermes so I cannot say if this is the typical shade from it or not, but cochineal, another red insect dye can be much deeper red. British army "redcoats" wore jackets of wool dyed with cochineal on a tin mordant, I have heard. --FurnaldHall (talk) 02:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mordants Affect Vegetable Dye Color 

message: Hello, I have removed the  template from this page. It does not appear that the text added at the time was subject copyright, nor that there is a corresponding VRT ticket. Should there be any queries, then please don't hesitate to contact me or post to the VRT noticeboard. Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTRS Pending Template
Talk:J. I. Albrecht

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Mystery of the Druids

message: If anybody else has played this game, feel free to fill out the rest of the plot. I've only filled it in up to Halligan getting to Lord Sinclair's estate. ScottSteiner (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Scratch that, it's completely filled out to the end of the game. ScottSteiner (talk) 06:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: I have rated this as C-Class. Two things which stand out as that the Gameplay section is a little too vague. It should be written so that lay people, not just video game fans, can understand how the game is played; after quickly reading that, I don't think I quite get that (note: I have not played the game before). The other thing is that I think the Plot section could be made a little more concise. I'm also not quite sure you need the "Alternate ending" subsection heading; I think that short paragraph could be tacked at the end of the "Plot" section with a note saying that this is the ending if you do such-and-such.
The other sections look OK. If you can improve on those two recommendations I listed above, I don't have a problem bringing it to B-Class. –MuZemike 21:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:VG]] assessment

message: Surely, Wikipedia is not a christian site, is it? It shouldn't be "AD", the religious term, but rather, "CE", the neutral term, in the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.128.173.20 (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Charles McKnight

message: I have a few questions:
* Why are there Early Life and Later Life sections for McKnight, who died rather young? 
* If there needs to be an Early Life section, maybe it needn't review his Revolutionary War service and death, but instead just talk about his childhood and early education? 
* Middletown Point eventually became Mount Pleasant, which is in Aberdeen Township. You'll see references to the point being part of Matawan, but that refers to Matawan Township, not Matawan Borough; the township changed its name to Aberdeen not very long ago. Seems to me that the internal link to Middletown Township is inappropriate.
McKnight's father is discussed in "Presbyterians Pioneer at Matawan: 1682-1959", The Price of Freedom:Charles McKnight, and Potter's American Monthly.
For those interested in history, the Aberdeen and Matawan articles lack decent coverage of 17th and 18th century events, which is one of the reasons that Middletown Point isn't clear in Wiki. Matawan's big history item at the moment deals with the famous shark attacks of 1916 that prompted the making of the movie Jaws. The Aberdeen article talks about late 19th century post offices and provides only the most basic facts about the Presbyterian and Quaker influences in the area. There is much to do. --Pat (talk) 17:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few challenges 
Talk:Toggling harpoon

message: Not being a whaler or a nautical type, I'm having trouble visualizing this from the description. Can someone make a simple diagram? CjPuffin  03:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture or something
Talk:The Compton Effect

message: Should this be moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Compton_Effect(album)
?
I added the track listing for the album CrimsonSun99 03:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?/Track listing
Talk:Other ranks (UK)

message: 'ORs' is no longer used. When describing a body of military men, it was: 'Officers and "Other Ranks" ', as the article suggests. Nowadays the term is: 'Officers and soldiers '.
I would change the article to reflect this, but I don't know when the term changed. I do know the newer expression was in use in the 1970s.RASAM (talk) 14:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of date

message: Seems to make no sense whatsoever.  Huw Powell (talk) 04:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The big table 

message: It seems odd to me that conductor is listed as a rank - surely it's an appointment like RSM or CSM? Jellyfish dave (talk) 11:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly...why list RLC Conductors and leave out Master Gunner, GSM, AcSM etc.? It is an appointment, not a rank. --Nozzer71 08:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conductor 

message: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/britains-parallel-army-of-cyberwarriors/news-story/3b4bbf421c1bd481e175b4c7bf4dd8f4
"New military cyber-ranks are to be created to lure digital gurus from the technology sector into uniform in Britain.
The creation of a parallel career structure for part-time cyberwarriors is just one of the defence modernisation initiatives that General Sir Nick Carter, head of the British armed forces, is pioneering.
In his first major interview since he was appointed chief of the defence staff last year, he says that rapid technological advances mean that the services are “increasingly going to have to accommodate far more specialists”."
BlueD954 (talk) 07:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New set of ranks to be announced 

message: This article should explain the extent to which its subject differs from what are called "enlisted" soldiers in the US military. Jess_Riedel (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't. Simply different terminology. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to enlisted
Talk:Crossband operation

message: I've wikified this article, bringing it up to the standards outlined in WP:WWF.  Lets keep a stub designation on this article.  We need quite a bit more info in order for this not to be considered a stub.  I noticed that at one time this article had com-stub.  I went with radio-stub as it seems to be more accurate.  --SB 04:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikified 
Talk:Constable (Texas)

message: so i'm reverting all the lists in the body of the text, at the very least because they have absolutely no date reference. Also I don't think lists of names is very encyclopedic anyways.
Also unencyclopedic- listing county info but only for five counties when texas has dozens and dozens...
also using direct lifts from the bexar county website.
so anyways I am reverting all this stuff but the vandal patrol needs to understand what is going on. 66.220.124.56 (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: lists in body