lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Economy of South Korea

message: What does this sentence actually mean?
Moreover, the dominance of chaebols, which has also been seen by many South Koreans as highly corrupt and influential in the political system, is unlikely to last and engenders risk of slowing down the transformation of the South Korean economy for the benefit of future generations.
 
From what I gather, it's saying:
The reduction of of corrupt chaebol influence creates a dangerous risk that will slow the economy, which will benefit future generations.
I have glanced through the three PDF sources (by ctrl-f chaebol) and all three claims the chaebols remains a very significant factor in the South Korea economy, with the government seeking to rein them in but allowing them to operate within limits.
The only statement remotely close to "unlikely to last" is about Park's campaigning to reduce reliance on them during an election, which was also not successful. (BTI 2016 South Korea Country Report, pg 2-3) I cannot find a reference that would make sense of "engenders risk of slowing down the transformation of the South Korean economy for the benefit of future generations". Seloloving (talk) 02:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentence 

message: So it says that the GDP per capita rank is 24th, and the nominal is 26th. However, this seems inaccurate as South Korea's GDP per capita PPP on this page doesn't match with what says on the list of countries by GDP PPP per capita list. Jishiboka1 (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about PPP 

message: I can’t post an article because I’m on a phone, but basically what happened was that Bloomberg posted an article that showed some sort of table that has been interpreted as the table of 50 countries that are most likely to suffer an economic default. On there, El Salvador was ranked at No. 1 while South Korea was ranked at 47.
Is this actually true? Or is there some sort of misunderstanding going on here? 117.111.22.168 (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it true that Bloomberg ranked South Korea as the 47th likely country to suffer an economic default? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Korea discount and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#Korea discount until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Korea discount" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sunjong of Korea

message: How did Sunjong "[rule Korea] from 1907 until 1920", if "his rein ended with the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty of 1910"? 152.91.9.115 00:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I attempted to enter Sunjong's full posthumous name, but as I am illiterate of the of the styles of the Korean language and its alphabet, I want to implore anyone who might help me, especially with the title of "Munun" and "Dongin" and every Hanja chracter of the name. Heran et Sang'gres 13:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! KAMSAHAMNIDA!! Heran et Sang'gres 15:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Posthumous Name

message: Hey...
I know that his first consort was Empress Sunmyeong, from the Yeoheung Mins...
But from what I've recently seen (from the official site of the Myeongseong drama), her posthumous name is listed as 純明孝太后  순명효태후 Sunmyeong hyo-taehu "The Filial Empress Dowager Sunmyeong". Very contrary to the posthumous name here in this article 純明孝皇后  순명효황후 Sunmyeong hyo-hwanghu "The Filial Empress (Consort) Sunmyeong"...
What is correct? Dan, a little help, please?
And might I ask, is there a difference in 太后/태후 and 皇太后/황태후?
Heran et Sang'gres (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm clueless. I'll look at Christopher Buyers' site first; he's very thorough. --Dan (talk) 15:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Here's what Christopher says: "(Sunjong married first) at Pyul Palace, Andong, Seoul, 15th March 1882, H.I.M. Empress Min [Sun-myong-hyo Hwang-hu] (b. 20th  November 1872; d. at the Kyongun Palace, Seoul, 11th  December 1904, bur. Yu-nung, Kumgok), raised to the rank and title of Crown Princess (Wang-se-ja-bin  Cho-ha) 1882, Great Crown Princess (Wang-se-tae-ja-bin) 1894, Imperial Princess (Hwang-se-ja-bin) with the style of Her Imperial Highness, 12th  October 1897, and to the posthumous rank of Empress as Sun-myong Hwang-hu, daughter of H.E. Count Min T'ae-ho, sometime Governor of Hwanghae and Assistant State Counselor of the Right. " --Dan (talk) 15:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  His first consort
Talk:Era name

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving. -- Yamara 03:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Merge with a non-existing article? Kokiri 18:17, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the current merge request dates back only to May 2007: 10:05, 22 May 2007 Dbachmann (Talk | contribs) (1,243 bytes) -- Yamara 03:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm giving the merge request till the end of this month to come up with discussion, or I'll close it unilaterally. Asian era names and Regnal year epochs are similar, but easily deserve their own articles. No Merge. —Yamara ✉ 17:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Later Jin invasion of Joseon

message: any thoughts on renaming this First Manchu invasion of Korea? and/or possibly combining the two articles into Manchu invasions of Korea? Appleby 23:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm down with it (the move, not the merge).  I've always thought that this and Second Manchu expedition to Korea were two of Wikipedia's most oddly-named articles.  "Expedition"?  It certainly wasn't a journey undertaken for "exploration and/or research." -- Visviva 10:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=8nXLwSG2O8AC&pg=PA61&dq=Chinese+frontiersman+jurchen&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pTrkUrjqJ6q0sQSE4oHAAw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Chinese%20frontiersman%20jurchen&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Han Bannerman Li Yongfang participated in the invasion 
Talk:Flag of South Korea

message: I'd consider arguing that Taegeukgi, currently a redirect to this page, should be made a separate page that discusses historical uses of the flag. The flag was used extensively by the Korean diaspora before 1945 (including by left-leaning groups), and even in the northern Korea occupation zone from 1946 to 1948. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taegeukgi
Talk:Gayasan National Park

message: I removed 'san' (산, 山) since it means 'mountain', and thus it would be translated as "Mount Mount Gaya"
Richardus (talk) 05:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Invertzoo (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing 'san' in Gayasan Mountain 

message: I propose that Gayasan (North Gyeongsang/South Gyeongsang) be merged into Gayasan National Park because they are essentially about the same subject. The Korean version of the page (:ko:가야산) is about the mountain, and contains a section about the national park. Its English language interwiki link points to the page about the national park, not the page for the mountain itself. This article could easily mention the mountain or mountains that are included in the park.  05:12, 5 July 2013‎ Rystheguy (talk | contribs)‎
:I understand the logic of the idea of a merger. However this seems to be a very large national park, and the mountain is just one feature within it, Hopefully in time both articles will be long enough to require each one having its own article. Invertzoo (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Geum River

message: Dear All,
the article suggests that the river's English "name" (and thus meaning?) is "gold". However, with respect, is this correct? I indicated on another occasion (quite rudely, I apologize for posting in the article! ^^) that the Hanja for the river was not 金, which has the 'meaning' of gold. I said that it was in fact  錦 and someone kindly changed it. As far as I am aware the character 錦 is one word for 비단 'silk', not 금 'gold'. Cheers, Mumun 23:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geum: silk not gold? 

message: In the presence of two differing data points, I am inclined to trust the more recent source.
http://eng.me.go.kr/docs_gg/geum_river/overview.jsp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.199.59.72 (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate length 
Talk:Geumgwan Gaya

message: Why does the Hangeul use Geum and not Gim/Kim? Is it a Gaya dialect? 2A00:23C5:C13C:9F01:2808:4A0:DEEA:630D (talk) 20:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim/ Geum 

message: I'll work on this page, but a lot of it seems poorly translate, not cited, a lot of the monarchs don't have list of dates when they were ruling, etc Sunnyediting99 (talk) 20:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs major rework
Talk:Gimhae International Airport

message: Is this SIN-PUS flight chartered or a yearly seasonal flight?? 173.54.13.112 (talk) 05:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SQ, Singapore Airlines 

message: Are they really discontinuing flights (via Seoul) to Munich?173.54.3.162 (talk) 03:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  LH, Lufthansa German Airlines 
Talk:Gimpo

message: It is a streach to say that Gimpo looks across the Han river into north Korea, as the downstream Han river is entirely within South Korea.
:Gimpo is bordered by Incheon on the south, the Han River on the East and North, and the sea on the West. It's city limits extend to cover then entire part of the peninsula it is located on. Within these limits is Aegibong Peak. Hence, it would be of no stretch to say one can peer across the Han River into North Korea. Liberum.philologus (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Han river
Talk:Gongju

message: There seems to be a bit of confusion in the media about exactly where the new capital is to be located. Some outlets have suggested that it is to be in Gongju city itself, others have said that it will be on a greenfield site in the county of the same name. Does anyone know which is right? -- ChrisO 15:43, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This should probably be updated, both in this article and elsewhere.  As far as I know, the new capital is actually proposed to straddle the border between Gongju City and Yeongi County, and the new site is (semi-?)officially referred to as "Yeongi-Gongju" (although I'd have to double-check that).  At any rate, the capital will be outside of the existing built-up area, as you are suspecting.  -Sewing - talk 14:27, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Will the new capital be *in* or *near* Gongju?
Talk:Goryeo Dynasty

message: I have merged this article into Goryeo, since there is no content here that is unique to the royal family, rather than the kingdom.  It could potentially be re-expanded as an article dealing with specifically dynastic issues, but at present it is simply an open invitation to duplicate articles.  
Note that the situation here is distinct from Joseon and Joseon Dynasty ... there the addition of "Dynasty" to the kingdom name is primarily for disambiguation purposes.  However, the name Goryeo is unique to this kingdom, and therefore there is no need for disambiguation, and therefore currently no need for a Goryeo Dynasty (or Wang Dynasty) article.  If in the future we have enough content to justify a separate article, then so much the better. -- Visviva 14:49, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Gunsan

message: hon ä en riktig pingla å en riktigt het tant som jobbar i dals ed på deras ungdomsgår (20mtw) här kallas hon gunsan. alla älskar henne här hon ä den bästa som finns här bättre än dom andra surkärringarna :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.17.155.160 (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  gunvor bohlin
Talk:Gyeongbu Expressway

message: This page currently says it's the second oldest seemingly without a source. On the other hand, Expressways in South Korea says it's the oldest.
I probably won't research this for now, but does anyone know if it's the oldest or not? If not which is the oldest? toobigtokale (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Second oldest"?
Talk:Gyeongbu Line

message: As a result, templates at the bottom of the page are not being expanded properly.
One possible fix may be to re-do the route map in the infobox using  instead of . davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia limits exceeded - [[WP:PEIS]]
Talk:Gyeonggi Province

message: This is very informative! - 68.72.123.164 04:25, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello
Talk:Gyeongin Expressway

message: I don't understand what is the difference between freeway and highway used in South Korea. People use the term "expressway/highway" and Gyeongin line is well-known to be the first one to be built.--128.83.158.185 (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeway and Highway 

message: OK, I have to ask:  Why would anyone want a picture of the Gyeongin Expressway?  :-)
On another note, the map currently displayed is misleading at best; it seems to depict the entire South Korean expressway system.  -- Visviva 13:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Gyeongseong

message: Les talk about it at Talk:Names of Seoul --Appletrees (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for merge

message: It was Japanese city, so it should be called in Japanese way.Elmor_rus (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not Keijo?
Talk:Haeinsa

message: According to , , , there's a Buddha statue that's rarely seen by outsiders; recently it was opened for the public for several weeks. I will upload some pictures from a friend shortly. The statue should likely be mentioned in the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rarely seen statue 
Talk:Han

message: HAN is an acronym for Home Area Network, as used by Smart Meters
BioImages2000 (talk) 17:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: HAN

message: If you want to add the list of historical people named Han, add it to Han (surname). Hanfresco 04:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: people named Han

message: I suggest that the two item disambiguation page Hän (disambiguation) be merged into this one, since it is a variant spelling and very small. Most of the time these variations are covered by the main disambiguation page, unless it becomes unwieldly large. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 06:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:TWODABS proscribes two-item dab pages; this one should never have been created and is the work of the author of NCL's passage which "justified" this move/creation, even though it created a violation of TWODABS.  They cannot be merged as people and language articles are to be separate, the solution is a hatnote on Hän language.  This title should be for what is now Hän people‎ as per Talk:Hän people‎#Requested move.Skookum1 (talk) 07:30, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a disambiguation page, not a people or language article. I don't see why we can't merge that disambiguation page into this disambiguation page. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Hän (disambiguation)]] into [[Han (disambiguation)]]
Talk:Hangul consonant and vowel tables

message: I'd like to see more info about how the Hangul corresponds to the IPA, so far I've only found the Roman transcription. 惑乱 分からん 14:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I was looking for the same thing (even if there are multiple possibilities).  For example, the difference between "j" and "jj" makes little sense without the phonetics. -- Beland (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA

message: Where is "ieung" name for North Korea? --Octra Bond 09:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ieung 

message: (Discussion transferred from the Help Desk)
Could someone with more knowledge of wiki markup please improve the layout of this article, so that the tables can perhaps fit two next to each other? Interchangeable 18:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm really not quite sure what you're looking to do. I might be able to help, but let's move this discussion to the talk page for the article. MyNameWasTaken (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to know if the tables can fit two next to each other. At present they are aligned on the left side of the page and don't take up the full width, which makes for an ugly scrolling experience. I'm looking for a layout of 9 rows of 2 tables, plus the one additional table at the bottom. Interchangeable 15:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table layout 

message: For instance the hangul character ㅿ links to this article, but no information is given here about it. —kess (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archaic Hangul not mentioned 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :ㅿ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 28#ㅿ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ㅿ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hangul Day

message: I removed the following passage:
:Some American and German linguists, including late James D. McCawley, celebrate this day yearly to recognise the creation of the Korean alphabet as a linguistic achievement of global significance. 
I don't think this is significant enough to be mentioned in Wikipedia. I read . It looks like they just wanted to have a party that was by no means formal. --Nanshu 22:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was it 1444 or 1446? Both are mentioned...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.29.254 (talk) 14:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original year 

message: The title of the article uses "Hangul," but the opening sections use "Hangeul." I understand that there can be variations in the the transliteration of any language, but it should be consistent within the article, or the difference should be explained. [user:PurpleChez|PurpleChez] 10/9/14
:I agree, the title should be Hangeul Day.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: yes --134.153.8.19 (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Honam

message: Does this article need to exist?  We have Jeolla, after all.  I have a hard time seeing how this can extend much beyond a dicdef.  -- Visviva 12:47, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Jeolla Province(ko:전라도) is historical administrative division, and Honam(ko:호남 지방) is region. --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) (Bieup Giyeok Ieung) 09:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for being
Talk:Hunminjeongeum Haerye

message: Hello, I am from Korea, but this is strange:
:The Haerye is Korean national treasure number 432.
Above was introduced in 2003-09-14 edit. I can confirm that there is no such thing as Korean national treasure no. 432. In fact the last number of the national treasure list is currently at 307. (No. 307 was assigned 2004-09-02. I read it on the newspaper.)
Haerye copy is No. 70, as far as I can tell. Current Wikipedia articles on Hunmin Jeongeum copies are seriously confused. There are actually 3 versions we are talking about:
1) Ye-eui copy. (Sample and Signification)
2) Eon-hae copy. (Hangul annotation)
3) Hae-rye copy. (Explanation with examples)
1) is the one recorded in the Annals. 2) is mostly a translation of 1), although there are differences. 3) is much longer, and includes 1) at the beginning.
(By the way, "The Sejong Chronicles" reference is a crap. It is just a part of Annals of Joseon Dynasty.)
There are 4 copies of 2). There are only 1 copy of 3). 
-- Anon
: Dear Anon from Korea, since it is so "strange", then please be bold and simply improve/correct this "crap". Wiki means those "seriously confused" articles gets corrected. Your insights will be appreciated more that way. --Menchi 21:30, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think :Image:Hunmin jeong-eum.jpg is obviously
;not 
:"Hunmin Jeongeum Haerye" 
:(訓民正音解例 or 解例本; , ) 
;but 
:"Hunmin Jeongeum Eonhae" 
:(訓民正音諺解 or 諺解本; ; w:ko:훈민정음 언해, s:ko:훈민정음언해) 
mainly because of its hangulfulness. :) Mulukhiyya (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right. --Kjoonlee 23:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different image? 
Talk:Hwacheon County

message: I've put up the new logo, but I'm not sure if I've got the tags right. If anyone can help me understand how to do this correctly, it would be apprciated! jke (talk) 00:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

message: Photos of: samgyeopsal, the mountains, sancheoneo trout, otter.
Sources for: economy, dragon festival (others?), native species (sancheoneo and mountain otter).
Feel free to edit this list directly to add more ideas until we have the core layout basically established. jke (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To Do

message: I have photos posted on Facebook that may interest you.  Please fell free to use them
Rudy Perini  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudy Perini (talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1953-4 photos 
Talk:Hwanin

message: Hwanin is 帝释天 (in chinese) ,Sakra-devanam-Indra (in Sankrit)
Please see  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra
"In China, Korea, and Japan, he (indra) is known by the characters 帝释天 (Chinese: 釋提桓因, pinyin: shì dī huán yīn, Japanese: "Tai-shaku-ten", kanji: 帝釈天). In Japan, Indra always appears opposite Brahma (梵天, Japanese: "Bonten") in Buddhist art. Brahma and Indra are revered together as protectors of the historical Buddha (释迦, Japanese: "Shaka", kanji: 釈迦), and are frequently shown giving Shaka his first bath. Although Indra is often depicted like a bodhisattva in the Far East, typically in Tang dynasty costume, his iconography also includes a martial aspect, wielding a thunderbolt from atop his elephant mount.
Some Buddhists regard the Taoist Jade Emperor as another interpretation of Indra."
also known as "Sakra"
"In East Asian traditions, Śakra is known as Dìshìtiān (帝釋天) or Shìtí Huányīn (釋提桓因) in Chinese, and also as Taishakuten (帝釈天) in Japan. In China, Śakra is sometimes compared to the Taoist Jade Emperor (Yùhuáng dàdì 玉皇大帝 often simplified in Yùhuáng 玉皇); both share a birthday on the ninth day of the first lunar month of the Chinese calendar (usually in February)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Aakra_(Buddhism)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.129.18 (talk) 02:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hwanin = Indra = Sakra = 帝释天= 玉皇大帝 
Talk:Hwarang Segi

message: How about Hwarang Segi?
:It is thought ordinarily as a forgery among Korean scholars. But a few scholars including Professor Yi Yung Hoon of Seoul National University department of economics is against it, and Korean News Paper reported about his claim:
*Korean page
*Machine translation by worldlingo (Hwarang Segi is translated as "anger Rang century")
:If translation does not appeared, please use Worldlingo.
:Please remember it is not my word but a report from Korean major news paper.--Kadzuwo 08:20, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Samguk_Sagi Here] 