Talk:Embraer Phenom 300

message: The Embraer web-site describes the Embraer Prodigy(TM) flight deck which is based on Garmin's G1000 avionics system. The "Prodigy" name does not relate directly to the G1000 and does not appear on the Garmin web-site. I have modified the avionics record in an attempt to reflect this, but I'm not sure if this is the best way of presenting the information .....
--Romney yw (talk) 01:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prodigy avionics 

message: Any consideration of merging the article with Embraer Phenom 100 since it is a variant of Phenom 100? ---Now wiki (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this proposition --Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  To merge 

message: According Naming conventions (aircraft) the title should be "Embraer EMB 505.
The TCDS no. A60CE state at note 6:
The EMB-505 is often referred to in Embraer marketing literature as the “PHENOM 300”.  This name is strictly marketing designation and is not part of the official model designation.
The same problem exists in the article EMB-500 (Phenom 100)--Ifixplanes (talk) 08:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See replies at Talk:Embraer Phenom 100#wrong title, in order to keep the discussions together. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 10:10, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong title 

message: File:Embraer EMB-505 Phenom 300 - Wallner.jpeg|current
File:Embraer 505 Phenom 300, Aerojet JP7625910.jpg|proposed
File:Embraer 505 Phenom 300 DRW Butler.jpg|pointing left, below
Embraer 505 Phenom 300, Private JP7407890.jpg|pointing left, side
DSC 3865-D-CLAM (10386616704).jpg|pointing left, climb, below
File:Embraer Phenom 300 (Air Hamburg) D-CHIC (23268529390).jpg|pointing left, front, cloudy
Embraer Phenom 300 (8858142112).jpg|pointing right, cloudy
File:N917LJ (6855281426).jpg|pointing right, level
Embraer 505 Phenom 300 SDU (8781201179).jpg|pointing right, colorful
The current picture is of the plane grounded; the proposed one is contrasty and is of the plane airborne, left-pointing and climbing.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 15:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  main photo change 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Embraer Phenom 300. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160807193838/https://www.gama.aero/files/GAMA_2015_Databook_LoRes%20updated%203-29-2016.pdf to https://www.gama.aero/files/GAMA_2015_Databook_LoRes%20updated%203-29-2016.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The deleted table and reference to runway overruns is notable and bold.  The large number of the same type of accidents/incidents on this type of aircraft is certainly notable and similar to the Ford Pinto fuel tank hazards and the B737 Max MCAS (737) system.  Both the Ford Pinto and B737 max have extensive wiki articles on those subjects.  I would like the previous addition reverted.  
JimBob2u (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The citations were invalid, they pointed to blank FAA and NTSB search forms. Aircraft types can't be blamed for gross pilot error. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 22:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

text: See WP:AIRCRASH for guidance : . Accidents are notable if they . If your "high propensity to be involved in runway excursion" is serious, aviation authorities would open a case, or at least news would emerge. Wikipedians are not here to judge if it is a notable repetition (see WP:synthesis), we are here to report reports.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runway Excursion deletion