Talk:Political campaign

message: I have attempted to introduce a definition that distinguishes campaigning (aimed at involving large numbers of people in bringing about political change) from lobbying (direct relationships between interest groups and politicians). 
This is a substantial change from the original article. I think it's valuable and I have some personal experience of the area. However I have no idea what, if any, academic consensus about this there is.  The Land 20:16, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing 

message: I added a history of American campaigns and a reading list of major books.  Richard Jensen 67.176.74.236 05:27, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Should this article's information be merged with this article: Political campaign staff --Blue387 02:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: no. The Land 08:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

text: no. The political campaign staff article is long enough to be on its own. -Tjss 03:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: The "Money is the mothers milk of politics" quote is from Jesse Unruh, there's an article about him, shouldn't we attribute the quote? Saline
:Done; hopefully that is correct as there is no reference in that article. -- Beland 21:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote attribution 

message: I've proposed to rename :Category:Campaigning to :Category:Election campaigning.  The discussion is at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_September_25#Category:Campaigning.  This might knock on to this article and others in the same category. Thanks jnestorius(talk) 23:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  category rename 

message: Can anyone tell me what the word specific adds to this definition?
*A political campaign is an organized effort which to influence the decision making process within a specific group.
Ace Diamond 22:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  style 

message: :Image:Liberalad.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 17:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Liberalad.JPG

message: Election surprise should be cut back and merged with this article. The vague intangible idea of "election surprise" is a political campaign tactic, so this is the obvious article for what little information Election surprise could possibly contain. JayKeaton (talk) 07:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: While some of the US political campaigns section may form a basis for relevant sections with worldwide scope, this should be merged to the article on US elections. This should then be replaced with a section entitled Political campaigning worldwide with a paragraph on the US, UK etc. TreveXtalk 13:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no objections I'm going to merge it out of this article? TreveXtalk 21:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge USA sections 

message: Civil society campaign, a stub, should just merge into this article, as it is simply a (probably British) syononym. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 06:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree- no new information in that article, basically the same topic, can easily be merged here. The DominatorTalkEdits 16:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Disagree - civil society organisations play a critical role in raising many issues that are beyond the formal political structures. Examples such as baby milk or Anti-retroviral treatments (for HIV) in developing economies are issues that stretch the political campaign label and lead to political campaigns. Mark Parker (talk) 13:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Oppose - The political campaign article is very long already and there is a big difference between a political campaign for office and one to effect social change. The groups that work to effect social change, such as NAACP, or Greenpeace work for many years and often decades to achieve their goals. Their work deserves and needs its own article because it is for social good without the personal desire for political power implicit in political campaigns for office. Marrante (talk) 06:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Oppose - Marrate says it well. Rjensen (talk) 06:18, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Oppose - Appearances can be deceiving.  While some political machinations try to appear to be benign civil campaigns, that does not mean all civil campaigns need to be tarred with the same 'political' brush.  I came to the article hoping to read a discussion of how "campaigner" has come to be a perjorative, but that doesn't mean that 'campaigner' == 'politician', an even worse label!  I imagine the article has been expanded since the latest proposal (Sept 2008).  I'd love to see more improvements to the article, but obviously I'd contribute negatives, so won't.... :-)  Shenme (talk) 05:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 2 

message: Just wondering why Electioneering redirects here, it's not mentioned at all in the article. Thoughts? --IvoShandor (talk) 08:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Electioneering

message: Campaign financing is a major obstacle to democratic countries for them to call themselves as being truly democractic. This, as not all political parties are able to spend a same amount of money on their campaign; hence benefitting parties that have more money (which is hence inheritly undemocratic). This money comes from private founders/companies which often expect something in return (ie new laws that help them to increase their revenue), hence promoting corruption.mall money mall money XD
See http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/campaign-finance-regulation-faulty-assumptions-undemocratic-consequences , http://socialproblemsarelikemaths.blogspot.be/2012/04/when-is-campaign-finance-undemocratic.html , http://conventions.cps.neu.edu/campaign-finance/introduction/
Perhaps we also need to mention the Federal Election Campaign Act, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Tillman Act, Federal Corrupt Practices Act, Federal Election Campaign Act, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
81.242.247.101 (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Obstacle for democracies

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Political campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080725075624/http://www.lppa.org/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,60/topic,9.0/ to http://www.lppa.org/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,60/topic,9.0/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Political campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080725075624/http://www.lppa.org/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,60/topic,9.0/ to http://www.lppa.org/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,60/topic,9.0/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Campaign sorting and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 3#Campaign sorting until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Campaign sorting" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Marimilan (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing Fall 2021 F1