lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Corymbia maculata

message: In this edit the following information was removed from Corymbia: 
Another popular garden tree which sheds its bark in a distinctive irregular round patches which take on a range of different colours from cream through blue-grey to orange or pink Native to coastal New South Wales and south-east Queensland but planted in many areas, the Spotted Gum is also valued for its tough, fine-grained timber, which is used for tool handles and other applications where hardness and resistance to warping is essential, e.g. axle blocks for wooden cart wheels.
I copy/pasted it here so that either I or someone else can integrate it with the article later. It was never referenced. JKDw (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted information 
Talk:Furry Lewis

message: I've removed text here as part of a broader investigation into improper copying of copyrighted materials. One bit of text is copied directly from here. The other removals are of text which I can't convince myself is original writing, although I can't point to a specific copied work. The material can be reintroduced (with appropriate attribution) but it should be either substantially rewritten or confirmed to not be copyright violation. Franamax (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of text - suspected copyvios 

message: Furry Lewis was a main component of the Alabama State Troupers Road Show --
https://www.allmusic.com/album/alabama-state-troupers-road-show-mw0000866082 --
Perhaps that should be mentioned on his page somewhere?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.121.140.67 (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Alabama State Troupers Road Show
Talk:Richard Attipoé

message: I have llassified this article as a stub due to its length. Capitalistroadster 13:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:GridIron Master

message: Regarding "notability", this article is as notable as many other board game articles under "List of Board Games"... which have not been marked for deletion.
Also notable as one of the few board games that simulates the Canadian Football League's wider field and 3 down style of play.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harris Seldon (talk • contribs) 07:33, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of municipalities of Basilicata

message: Hey the title is wrong: Basilicata is not a province but a region composed of two provinces: Matera and Potenza
:The title has been corrected. Cattus talk 19:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At some point someone needs to organise these kinds of lists - perhaps it would make more sense to split into separate lists for Matera and Potenza? Plus names need synchronising - we have Comuni of the Province of Potenza for instance. And then that's before you start playing with the format of the list, the Potenza list is quite nicely laid out. FlagSteward (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was Move.  I only did this one.  Others can move the rest if applicable.  —Wknight94 (talk) 17:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Comuni of the Province of Agrigento which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Félix de Muelenaere

message: Why is the same source considered to be 7 different ones? TuorEladar (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @TuorEladar: I've fixed the reference coding so that the first reference is named, and the other uses refer to that first named call. —C.Fred (talk) 23:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs
Talk:Fire-bellied toad

message: The link for "Fire-Bellied Toad Care" directs to a generic search engine... The target must have changed URL and then the search engine took the previous URL.
24.16.217.61 17:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Commercial external link removed.  JoJan 18:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Need for Speed: ProStreet/Archive 1

message: I was the closing admin on the afd and ruled it no consenus. Since it was so close, I will notate my reasons here, but as the closing admin, I will not participate in a debate on what to do with the article in the future, but would give advice about what options are available. The voting was clearly close and well within the closing admin's purview to call no consensus. In addition, the article has a "future game" tag and the article clearly says it's not yet released. While the manufacturer has not said it's coming out, other websites do discuss it, therefor, IMHO, this meets  wiki's verifiability requirement, which is all WP:CRYSTAL requires, it does not require an "official" announcement. If there were no refs at all, I'd delete it or if there was a clear policy violation, I'd delete it, but unless there is a policy I don't know about (entirely possible), I don't see that. There is no wiki ban on future events as long it can be verified as in the works, as I see the written wiki policy. I understand and respect those who disagree with me, but I can not in good conscience change my mind. The options for those who want to delete the article are to refile for another afd or to seek deletion review. Regards, Rlevse 11:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for no consensus ruling

message: ...will the game be released for the smaller consoles (i.e. PS2, Xbox, Gamecube...etc.) as well? When this is KNOWN, please respond. JustN5:12 22:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the game purely next generation, or...
Talk:Cardston

message: All of that business about "world leader" is an exaggeration and nonencyclopedic.
Statements about "world leader" and "world famous" are overwrought and exaggerated.
For example, it is true that Paul McCartney is a "world famous" musician, but we do not need to state that. This is a salient fact that goes without saying.98.67.96.127 (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overwrought language 

message: Information about transportation is vital and encyclopedic, but none has been included.
1. Has there ever been a railroad through Cardston?
2. Is there a transprovencial highway through Cardston?
3. It there an airport in or near Cardston?
4. There is a highway from the south into Cardston that is an extension of U.S. Highway 89, which is an important one. However, there is no mention of this fact in the article. This highway connect Cardston with Montana and Idaho.98.67.96.127 (talk) 13:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transportation
Talk:Myth: History in the Making

message: Items which would be nice to add:
* Game plot
* Overview of levels
* Characters
* Screenshot
* Release dates
It should also be mentioned that at least the Spectrum version is pretty much a remake than a port of the original, it's very different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.22.79.214 (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wish list
Talk:GS&WR 101 Class

message: perhaps this article should be merged with GSWRI Class J15. --Niall88 14:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was done. Some content may have been duplicate on both articles at some point and there may have even been a backwards copy but too time consuming to check. In all events merge done long ago.  Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge
File talk:Carrabelle Tallahassee Georgia Railroad c00012.jpg

message: This is a unique digital photo from The Florida Memory Project, 
Florida Department of State. It holds the archives' number of: rc00012
Use: The use of photographs and other materials in the custody of the State Archives of Florida is governed by state law and, in some cases, by the terms of the donation agreement under which the Archives acquired the images. In accordance with the provisions of Section 257.35(6), Florida Statutes, "Any use or reproduction of material deposited with the Florida Photographic Collection shall be allowed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)(b) and subsection (4), provided that appropriate credit for its use is given." Please contact the Archives if you have any questions regarding the credit and use of any material. 
Florida Department of State
State Library and Archives of Florida
500 S. Bronough St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250
(850)245-6700
*Copyright Information
Noles1984 14:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Presentation Sisters

message: http://www.silive.com/columnists/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1261306832141840.xml&coll=1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.33.180.176 (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A preview of this newspaper article is archived here, and it shows the easily checked years 1775 & 1874 misreported as 1774 & 1884. So, I'm not eager to purchase the rest of the article behind the NewsBank paywall. —173.68.139.31 (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Staten Island
Talk:Hyndburn

message: Added information & a reference on the possible renaming of Hyndburn to Accrington & District. Looking at the size of the article compared to articles on Blackburn, Accrington and Lancashire, one can see for themselves that the name Hyndburn is largely anonymous in areas not near it. Lradrama 14:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Hurricanes (Pull Tiger Tail song)

message: Don't think that they have enough singles released yet to warrant seperate articles, information here would be better at the bands article page.--Speed Air Man 14:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think four singles is sufficient. Some bands don't even release four singles from an album. I'll take down the merge proposal in a week if there are no major objections. --Featherfin 15:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arihiro Fukuda

message: As per WP:PROF, Fukuda should be considered deserving on an article for the following reasons:
* His Sovereignty and the Sword is widely cited.
* He had an international conference devoted to his memory in 2004.
* His name appeared in Deaths in 2003 soon after he died, and was not subsequently removed as superfluous.
— Zalktis 14:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Adolph Aschoff

message: This is a great start, but the article needs an encyclopedic introduction (introduce the subject in the first sentence, explain why he is significant), the writing needs to be made more encyclopedic and hopefully some of the references can be turned into footnotes. Let me know if you need help. Katr67 14:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a feeling this article is a copyvio, but it's not a cut and paste from the Internet, anyway. Katr67 20:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As of today, the article still needs wikification and copy editing, so I've replaced the tag. Valfontis (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article concerns Aschoff's family: http://oregonmag.com/Pintarich402.htm
-Pete 19:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  more reference
Talk:Anita Strindberg

message: I can't find reliable sources to verify the date of birth. Looking at the history, the date of birth was initially listed as 1944 but was changed without explanation. The date now matches that given by IMDb but IMDb is notoriously unreliable for this type of info. A different editor added details for her date of death (I can't find any source to back this up) and another one added information of her current place of residence (from what I can tell this was inferred through this dubious methodology ). Until we have better sources (or for that matter any sources), it's probably best to leave the potentially bogus bits of info out of the article. Pichpich (talk) 18:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth and current place of residence
Talk:Standard model (cryptography)

message: The argument on this page showing that the PKI model is at least as powerful as the CRS model is incorrect - this is because in the common random string model, many parties may be required to share a common random string. 
For example, you can use the CRS model to do non interactive zero knowledge proofs - the main advantage of using this model is that the verifier does not need to interact with the prover, the proof is simply a single message. Unlike the interactive setting, many different verifiers could verify the same proof in this model, and they do not even need to be present when the system is set up. If you create your common reference string by using a coin flipping protocol (which must be interactive, and between a fixed number of players), both of these advantages are lost.
For this reason, I'm going to remove this argument. Birkett 12:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection between CRS and the PKI models
Talk:Chalicotherium

message: Great to see a prehistoric mammal worked on. The issue with the two daughter genera needs addressing. What does it mean? Are the two names older? These daughter genera should be sunk into Chalicotherium (?)cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 20:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it seems current phylogenetic analyses find Anisodon and Nestoritherium nested within Chalicotherium. Following suit on the term "daughter clade" I called them "daughter genera". I'll try to find some more about it. I've put the citation for the daughter genera and explained a bit more if that's good enough for now. Dracontes 09:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article at :File:San Antonio Express. (San Antonio, Tex.), Vol. 46, No. 125, Ed. 1 Friday, May 5, 1911 - DPLA - 439279cac63683e0b9ab35f6d2626412 (page 3).jpg, this was a complete skeleton of Chalicotherium but when I inserted it to the article, it was removed as an image of Anisodon but it seems like this was  using a sock. Can anyone confirm whether the article is correct or not (it's from 1911 so I wouldn't expect it to be correct) but it's a decent image. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The image was labeled as Anisodon, so I saw no problem in removing it. --Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 12:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  My apologies. I was being completely dumb. I was looking at the wrong image entirely. You are correct. I had inserted the text but not the image. Inserted it now. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   The Pittsburgh skeleton is not Chalicotherium but Moropus elatus . The true Chalicotherium has only been found from Eurasia, not from North America. --Paranaja (talk) 10:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Chalicotherium skeleton 1911-05-05.jpg]]
Talk:Area codes 812 and 930

message: Isn't it a little Amerocentric? Assuming prior knowledge of USA, the area code system etc. Is it not concievable that there is another area code 812 in some other country?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.138.247.169 (talk) 04:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amerocentrism 
Talk:Cookbook

message: There should be a wikicookbook for people using free mode on Facebook and also there should be Wikiyourcountryfood, so you just click your country name and you choose the food you want to learn about in times of cooking. Please its a suggestion to Wikipedia 😊.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yakubu lilian (talk • contribs) 06:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added the Leeds University Library's Cookery Collection to the list of Cookbook collections in this article. I have also added a declaration of Conflict of Interest above to supplement this contribution. I have a full declaration on my user page which explains that I am contributing towards the Wikimedia initiative GLAM. If any users would like to discuss this with me I am more than happy to do so. Please contact me at my talk page. Imogen at Leeds Uni Library (talk) 11:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Cookbook Collections addition

message: Should any cookbook worthy of an article (or notable cookbook author's most prominent work) be in this list? Should we be considering whether a cookbook that should be included in this list have an article, or is the author's article sufficient? There's one book listed that has a link neither to book nor to author -- should it be in the list? valereee (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  famous cookbooks section/questions 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Wikipedia Cookbook. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 14#Wikipedia Cookbook until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  -- Tavix (talk) 23:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wikipedia Cookbook" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Texts in China with large recipe collections exist earlier than referenced in the article today: Qimin Yaoshu (544 CE) has a cookbook within it, and interestingly quotes extensively from a now-lost Classic of Food (食經).
Additionally,Madam Cui's Food Canon (崔氏食經) is from roughly the same time as Qimin Yaoshu, and at least claims to be written by a woman although I'm not sure if we have that text in its entirety - that calls into question Eumsik dimibang being "the first cookbook written by a woman in East Asia."
My source here is mostly https://www.worldcat.org/title/science-and-civilisation-in-china-pt-5-vol-6-fermentations-and-food-science-biology-and-biological-technology/oclc/226180517.  I'm not sure how editors on this page manage things so I wanted to start discussion before going in and making changes. Meteorswarm (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest Cookbooks in Asia Seem Late
Talk:Appropriate adult

message: I'm objecting to the deletion and I'm going to put a bit of work into cleaning this article up.  Xmp (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 
Talk:Ice pack

message: I've changed most of the article (every bit I could find) to clarify the fact that it's the melting of the ice that absorbs energy, not the temperature change. If you doubt this, go ahead and calculate the temperature change that water would require to absorb as much heat as an identical quantity of water melting. I get a temperature change of 80°C, far in excess of the range for a normal ice pack. From this it should immediately be clear that for a small change in temperature, the ice-water transition can absorb a gigantic amount of energy, and then go on to absorb that little bit more from actually changing temperature.
I'm not really certain of whether additives are used to improve the enthalpy of fusion of the water (or if there are completely different substances that are better). The best alternative to water that I can come up with is pure ammonia (or liquefied hydrogen perhaps), but it has an awkwardly low melting point so I don't think it's used in medical packs (or anything that goes in a household freezer). As such I reduced the additives mentioned to just anti-bacterial action inside the pack and the gelling agents, since I can't seem to find a better example of heat absorption. If there is a better chemical for absorbing heat around that temperature by anything reversible (perhaps a dehydration reaction of some kind) and it's in use, it'd help to mention it.
The explanation having to involve moles is awkward, especially since the Enthalpy of Fusion page states that the SI units are kJ/mol, but then lists a bunch of kJ/kg measurements. I'm not aware of a special name for enthalpy of fusion per kilogram not mole, but if it exists it would massively simplify that explanation. I think it reads awkwardly, but I can't think of a way to reword it without losing continuity or flow. 118.208.103.227 (talk) 08:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You wrote Enthalpy of Vaporization in your title. I think you meant Enthalpy of Fusion. Vmelkon (talk) 05:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enthalpy of Vaporisation, not specific heat capacity. 
Talk:Long-term asset

message: Hey, perhaps I'm paranoid, but it would appear that the bottom part of this page looks suspiciously like a cut-and-paste copyright violation, I cannot however find where it would be from.  Even if it is not, however, it reads far too much like an essay and not an encyclopedia article.  Please comment. Lordthees 15:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Copyright Violation
Talk:Emily Warren Roebling

message: While stomach cancer is reported in "The Great Bridge" (McCullough, 555), Washington Roebling notes that she died of "progressive muscular atrophy" from being struck by a motorcycle while traveling in Atlanta (MS Box 9, Folder 5, EWR to WAR, February 10, 1902, Roebling Family Collection, Special Collections and University Archives, Rutgers University Libraries). Emily's biographer notes that her physician, Dr. Clark, attempted to dispel the rumors of stomach cancer (Weigold, 137), and Washington mentions that she had no serious ulcerations of the stomach (WAR to JAR II, December 18, 1902, MS Box 16, Folder 8, Roebling Family Collection, Special Collections and University Archives, Rutgers University Libraries).
Brian Mulholland 14:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Her Terminal Illness
Talk:Andrew Nagorski

message: At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Cable landing point

message: In 1985 there was a long article in New Yorker Magazine about the US defense system's reliance on the extant telephone system, including a description of how the telephone cable (that carried the information from NORAD) came ashore in San Francisco.--McTrixie/Mr Accountable 15:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the point in mentioning it without a proper reference? Otherwise it is heresay. Rarelibra 13:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Francisco 

message: Is Porthcurno not a particularly (possibly the most) notable landing point? 90.155.73.34 (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable landing points
Wikipedia talk:Be Afraid

message: __TOC__
This page scares me. >Radiant< 15:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I've just fixed the misspelled redirect hidden behind "underlying Bureaucracy". Sorry if I've spoiled intentional humor with that. -- Matthead  Discuß   10:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  underlying Bureaucracy  

message: I would appreciate if someone might like to write up Wikipedia:NOT_Much to tidy up some of the obviously inaccurate claims made by WP:NOT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.220.108 (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Much 

message: I'm guessing it's purposeful that this page does NOT follow the MOS? ie. the See also section is misplaced and its heading is miscapitalized. (See WP:JUSTAGUIDELINE, particularly the end part ;) -- œ™ 05:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not afraid