Talk:Baltimore Light RailLink

message: I updated the reference to paying to get between modes.  In Baltimore all modes of local transit on the MTA require a payment per boarding (unless you buy a pass), even when the lines a passenger uses connect.
http://www.mtamaryland.com/fares/currentfares/
--D carth kelly 08:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Loodog, I understand this seems weird if you don't live in the area, but this is by right a criticism that should be levelled at the Maryland MTA as a whole.  It's not just intermodal transfers: you don't get a free transfer even when you transfer from one bus to another.  In fact, the light rail is the only MTA service where one fare gets you a ride on more than one vehicle: you can transfer from one light rail line to another without paying for a new ticket. --Jfruh (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boarding Payment

message: Each car is shown to have three trucks, only articulated passenger cars or trams have three or more trucks. Rigid North American passenger cars are 85 ft or 86 ft long and 10 ft 6 in wide. Freight cars are 10 ft 8 in wide. See Loading gauge for dimensional data. A rigid 95 foot long car  would be "fun and games" on tight curves. Peter Horn 17:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's true, the cars are articulated.  Thanks for adding that point to the article. --Jfruh (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Light Rail (Baltimore)#Rolling stock|Rolling stock]]

message: While the various light rail routes are colored fairly consistently on maps, the terms "Yellow Line" and "Blue Line" aren't used by the MTA (and, as far as I know, aren't consistently used by passengers in practice), and thus shouldn't be used in articles about the light rail.  While this terminology isn't used in this article, I've noticed it creeping into the individual station articles.  I'm going to edit those to remove the references, but I'm putting this note here as a place to refer people to when I make the tweaks, and for further discussion. --Jfruh (talk) 00:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are no such things as "yellow" and "blue" lines 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Baltimore Light Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090207003754/http://www.mtamaryland.com/MTA%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%202007%20031308.pdf to http://www.mtamaryland.com/MTA%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%202007%20031308.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110909233527/http://www.baltimorerailplan.com/linked_files/brreportfinal.pdf to http://www.baltimorerailplan.com/linked_files/brreportfinal.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Baltimore Light Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207003754/http://www.mtamaryland.com/MTA%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%202007%20031308.pdf to http://www.mtamaryland.com/MTA%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%202007%20031308.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Light RailLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228100635/http://www.baltometro.org/TIP/TIP2010_13Final.pdf to http://www.baltometro.org/TIP/TIP2010_13Final.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Currently there is content that reads: "There are no cross-platform connections with the Metro Subway. The Lexington Market subway and light rail stations are a block apart and connected only via surface streets. There are plans to cover the sidewalk between the two stations.[9]" It should read: There are no cross-platform connections with the Metro Subway. The Lexington Market subway and light rail stations are a block apart and connected only via surface streets." The current connection city sidewalk is uncovered (as of Nov 2018). There are no plans for them to be covered, and the cited article is from 2009. I think after 9 years we can consider that point closed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.224.219.226 (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I don't think it's been shown to be a high priority for the city. oknazevad (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fares and transit connections 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Including the disambiguated Mt. Vernon, which is moved to Mt. Vernon station (Light RailLink).   — Amakuru (talk) 11:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Comment: Any additional thoughts about certain article name spellings? The MTA abbreviates "Mount" as "Mt." on their Light RailLink maps. Which spelling should be preferred here? (If Mt. is preferred, Mount Washington station should also be moved to Mt. Washington station for consistency across the system). Additionally, spaces exist between the words and slashes (like for example Mt. Royal / MICA station on their maps, vs. Mt. Royal/MICA station which is cleaner in my opinion. Should these spaces be included or the spaces deleted? Just figured that we clear this up and enforce spelling consistency across the system. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: for consensus on Mt. Vernon station Bensci54 (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 January 2024