lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sterility assurance level

message: This come completely from http://www.mic4.com/library/technology/SterilityAssuranceLevel.pdf ! It really is a copy/paste !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.224.160.14 (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: The first paragraph is too wordy. The idea it appears to express (scientific notation) doesn't have to be explained that verbosely. A link to scientific notation should be sufficient. Temporaluser (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Terminology Section 
Talk:North Berwick Line

message: I propose that North Berwick Branch be merged with this article. It covers, in extraordinary detail, the route from Drem to North Berwick, which is the only part of the North Berwick Line which is not part of the ECML. I can't see any particular reason why one article exists as the historical while this one exists as the present. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

text: It'd probably be easier to merge them the other way - this article is completely unsourced, and partly out of date. Black Kite (talk) 13:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggested this way as North Berwick Line seemed to be a more modern name than North Berwick Branch. I was assuming that the resultant article would be the same under either name. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the North Berwick branch article is the one to keep. It is longer (despite covering a shorter section of track) and has a range of cited sources. I also feel that route articles are more useful than service articles as the train operating companies regularly change service details. The Line article says that some continue west of Edinburgh. Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with North Berwick Branch
Talk:North Berwick railway station

message: There appear to be several striking similarities in the text of the Article to Andrew Hajducki's book (cited on the page as a reference) - but I feel any editors with access to a copy should urgently compare the page here and the book.
I shall reply with details should anyone need them: an example is (describing North Berwick station) ' the Grand but decaying station buildings' - is lifted directly from the book in question.
Forthbridge (talk) 09:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Shabnam Surayyo

message: The article says: she is a popular singer. So, it asserts some kind of notability. If you disagree, or you think the notability should be proven, go to AfD. The criteria for the speedy deletion says:
"If the assertion is likely to be controversial or there has been a previous AfD, the article should be nominated for AfD instead."
Jahangard 02:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kirkcaldy railway station

message: ===Description===
This article would cover all Fife-related articles such as places, famous people, museums, football and rugby clubs and churches to name a few. Examples would be: Kirkcaldy, Andrew Carnegie, Adam Smith, Dunfermline Abbey, Dunfermline Athletic, The Old Course and Kirkcaldy Museum and Art Gallery. This could also help support articles that really do need a lot of work while keeping general maintenance. Examples would be: Methil, Dunfermline, Cupar and a lot of the smaller towns such as Kennoway and Lower Largo. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_WikiProject_Fife. 
Kilnburn (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to the image was removed by a bot since the image no longer exists, having been deleted (see deletion log), the stated reason: for having "no source, no license". Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject WikiProject Fife 

message: This article would cover all Fife-related articles such as places, famous people, museums, football and rugby clubs and churches to name a few. Examples would be: Kirkcaldy, Andrew Carnegie, Adam Smith, Dunfermline Abbey, Dunfermline Athletic, The Old Course and Kirkcaldy Museum and Art Gallery. This could also help support articles that really do need a lot of work while keeping general maintenance. Examples would be: Methil, Dunfermline, Cupar and a lot of the smaller towns such as Kennoway and Lower Largo. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_WikiProject_Fife. 
Kilnburn (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to the image was removed by a bot since the image no longer exists, having been deleted (see deletion log), the stated reason: for having "no source, no license". Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Description
Talk:Hunger (2001 film)

message: I'm moving this to Hunger (2001 film) as there are a number of notable films with this name. Mostlyharmless (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Leuchars railway station

message: The next station on the Tayport branch (the main line before the Tay Bridge route was constructed) is listed as Tayport East, but I have been unable to find a reference to a station of that name, only Tayport. Also the original Leuchars station (later know as Leuchars Old) lay between  what was then Leuchars Junction and Tayport, so should it not be listed as the next station? Dunarc (talk) 19:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic railways 

message: Why are the rail distances always given in chains? This has no significance for today's reader. Valetude (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: because that's what the reliable sources use; I've  a suitable link. Please see also the discussion at Talk:Darlington railway station#Distance from London. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chains? 

message: For some years now, there has been one daily train from Aberdeen (currently 07:07) to Edinburgh that does not stop at Leuchars (even on Saturdays) and goes non-stop from Dundee (currently 08:22) to Haymarket (currently 09:21). See ScotRail Train Times 19 May - 14 December 2019 Peteradamson (talk) 09:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all trains stop at Leuchars
Talk:Aberdeen railway station

message: Could someone please confirm whether or not the Gaelic name appears on the station's signage? If not, it shouldn't appear in the article's infobox. Signalhead (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaelic name 

message: It has been proposed to move Aberdeen to Aberdeen, Scotland or Aberdeen city, and to move Aberdeen (disambiguation) to Aberdeen.  The discussion about this is here.  --Una Smith (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of requested move

message: no UK railway station articles are capitalised on the words railway and station. Sorry, but there must be a consensus about that or we would have changed them all. The joy of all things (talk) 14:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that - I've moved it back now. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  thank you for being so amenable. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem - thank you for making me aware. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move
Talk:USA Track & Field

message: The article implies that the USATF Hall of Fame and the National Track and Field Hall of Fame are separate. What exactly is the relationship?  How are the members actually selected? Racepacket (talk) 14:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hall of fame

message: As suggested at Draft:Track and field in the United States some of the content here (history, with further details) would be useful for a new article Track and field in the United States (currently a draft). In my opinion, such article would be a good idea. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  As far as creating an article about Track and field in the United States, that is certainly an encompassing article that would include the contributions and limitations of USATF along with many other aspects. I'm all for it, just not at the expense of splitting this article. Trackinfo (talk) 20:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Dunbar railway station

message: I am sure that I have seen somewhere a website which states that this station used to have significantly more platforms in use and that the current platform is on a loop off the main lines.  As soon as I can work out where I saw it (probably on the history of my home laptop - at work at the moment!) I will try to add it to this article.ColourSarge 15:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of platforms 

message: The lead says the second platform is open whilst the Facilities section says it's still being built. Which is it? Stifle (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The new platform at Dunbar station opened in December 2019. I have updated the facilities section and added a source. The contradiction issue is now resolved. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Berwick-upon-Tweed railway station

message: Berwick was the furthest point reachable after the East Coast Main LIne was severed by flooding in 1948.
Haymarket drivers kept a non stop service running from Edinburgh to London via Tweedmouth and the Tweed valley/Waverley routes86.128.63.117 (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide any references for this information?  If so please include it in the article....if you don't have any references then we will need to wait for one to be produced before adding this...ColourSarge (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floods 1948 

message: Berwick was the furthest point reachable after the East Coast Main LIne was severed by flooding in 1948.
Haymarket drivers kept a non stop service running from Edinburgh to London via Tweedmouth and the Tweed valley/Waverley routes86.128.63.117 (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floods 1948
Talk:Acklington railway station

message: Has the service level here increased since 2018?
Need to know so this can be updated.
“In the current (December 2018) timetable the only trains calling at Acklington are one northbound and two southbound local services operated on Mondays to Saturdays only by Northern, which also manages the station.” Maurice Oly (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service level
Talk:Widdrington railway station

message: Has the service level changed since December 2016?
Just need to know so this can be updated.
“In the current (December 2016) timetable the only trains calling at Widdrington are one northbound and two southbound local services on Mondays to Saturdays only by Northern, which also manages the station.” Maurice Oly (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service level?
Talk:Heavenly Puss

message: This episode seems to be related to the Powell-Pressburger Classic Stairway to Heaven starring David Niven and Kim Hunter.
Robert Schediwy 86.33.220.2 09:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to ''Stairway to Heaven?''

message: Should they be removed since Wikiquote is the collection of quotes? TobytheTramEngine 20:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ''Quotes'' Section 

message: "Spike the Bulldog, personified as the devil, awaits." should it be "The Devil, personified as the Spike the Bulldog, awaits." ? Rich Farmbrough, 07:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Rich Farmbrough, 07:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Personified
Talk:Gleneagles railway station

message: Butt (1995), p. 71 shows Crieff Junction as renamed Gleneagles on 1 April 1912. Ordnance Survey 1:2500 maps of 1864-5 and 1901 show Crieff Junction station at the same position as Gleneagles station is shown on the 1972 map at the same scale. The statement in this article for them being at different positions is unsourced. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Inclined to agree with you on this one. --Stewart (talk | edits) 21:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crieff Junction 
Talk:Perth railway station (Scotland)

message: "won an architecture prize". Must be more specific than that. What was the name? What year? For what exactly? The terrydactyl (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Paragraph Problems.  
Talk:Aviemore railway station

message: The infobox photo looks like it was taken with a blue filter over the lens. Can one with a good white balance be found? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox photo 
Talk:Beauly railway station

message: Recently, Geoff has just measured the length of the platform which is 15m 96cm. Can we trust this experiment? 
The video for the experiment is Measuring Beauly - All The Stations.
Thank you.
Itpcc (talk) 10:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, WP:NOR. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The platform measurement by "All The Stations" project.
Talk:Dingwall railway station

message: Is Dingwall - Inverness double-tracked? Or two parallel single lines? Graldensblud 13:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is single track, with a crossing loop at Muir of Ord. Signalhead 16:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Scotrail always say that they cannot increase the service on these lines because of single line operation using RETB from Inverness to Dingwall I don't see any concrete plans to change this though.  Soarhead77 (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation/etc
Talk:Invergordon railway station

message: This station must be reasonably unique in that it is a two platform station with no footbridge in current form. Does anyone know when the original footbridge was removed? Every other two platform station on the far north line has a footbridge, and its inconcievable that this station would be built without one! The more so when you think that in the early 20th Century there were around 20 people employed on the railway in Invergordon. 
Soarhead77 (talk) 08:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure it's necessary to have more than a short sentence or two about the crash, that could possibly have its own page if really necessary. Taking up more than half of the page with the names, ages and histories of everyone that died seems more than overkill. Lord British (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAF Sunderland Crash
Talk:Golspie railway station

message: Removed advertising for the rental of the station building from this article.
--92.6.176.95 (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising. 

message: No source is given for the year 1874. The station buildings listed on http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/LB7009 dates it as 1868. Now there could have been a gap between the building's construction and the opening of the line, but 6 years? It's likely one of these dates is wrong--FDent (talk) 21:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It opened in 1868 and I have added some refs for that. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date?
Talk:Hit Parade of 1943

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Kateshortforbob talk 17:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hog Wild (1930 film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Were there any other movies named "Hog Wild"? If not, then the article should be moved to "Hog Wild (film)". TJ Spyke 00:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Does anyone else find this section hugely overlong and far too detailed?--HarringtonSmith (talk) 04:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Brazil Classics, Vol. 5: The Hips of Tradition

message: Why is this flagged?  Should only certain albums have wikipedia entries?----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kxw1 (talk • contribs) 
:Sorry, I was a bit hasty with the tag as I see this album has independent reviews.  It would be good to expand the article using those reviews.  Pan Dan 16:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thurso railway station

message: This cries out for some detail because on the surface it looks like a poor candidate on economic grounds.  I  had heard it was for the nuclear connection.  Can anyone provide some evidence?--FDent (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: A number of people who lived in Thurso worked at Dounreay nuclear power station. One of my friends moved home from Thurso to Abingdon in 1994 because her father's job was moved from Dounreay to Harwell. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escaping Beeching
Talk:Hoy railway station

message: I have changed the station opening date from 28 July 1874 to 1 October 1874. This source mentions clearly on 28 July that the station will not open with the rest of the line: 
However, I have not been able to find a reference for the 1 October 1874 date. However, this date has been used on other articles such as History of the Far North of Scotland Railway Line and Sutherland and Caithness Railway so I have included it here as well. If anyone can find out any more info on the opening date, feel free to add it to the article. Thanks FozzieHey (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @FozzieHey  says 1 October 1874 based on information from the Railway Clearing House and a company notice published in the John o' Groat Journal on 1 October. The journal is on the British Newspaper Archive so you can see the notice for yourself here Nthep (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the PDF, I haven't seen that before. I did actually find that newspaper notice before, which sort of implies the opening of Hoy, with the text "Opening of the line throughout", but it doesn't mention Hoy's opening directly. From my searches I can only find Hoy on timetables from 1 October 1874, which again adds to the credibility of that being the correct date. FozzieHey (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Quick is well researched, so unless you find anything as good that says otherwise, I'd go with 1 October. Nthep (talk) 22:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station opening date
Talk:CJRL-FM

message: Does CJRL still air messages to listeners without other means of communication? --24.78.124.2 01:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Corrour railway station

message: Can someone please help by supplying how the word Corrour is pronounced, using the WP phonetic alphabet, which I personally find difficult. "Corrour" has three syllables, the second syllable is stressed and it and the unstressed third syllable are pronounced to rhyme with “bower”. This is the same as how the Gaelic "Coire Odhar" is pronounced. Exbrum (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: You ask "why was the template removed?" The short answer is because the URL in the template was marked "url-status=dead". The long answer is that I found the new location of the document and made several attempts to edit the template so that the URL went directly to the document. After failing miserably (the previous template seemed more complicated than the comparatively straightforward one you have now inserted) I decided that it was preferable to fix the URL by a method I am familiar with (namely omitting the template) than to persevere with a "dead" URL. I reasoned that once I had the correct URL on display, and if a template were essential, someone who understood templates better than I would soon spot it and make it good. Which is exactly what has happened. Thank you. Exbrum (talk) 20:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template removed
Talk:Chappell's

message: To whoever made this page: Please learn how to spell properly and wikify properly. Also, please learn to add sufficient context. I really had to hunt to find the city some of these malls were in. I have made as much cleanup as I can. TenPoundHammer 03:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling/Cleanup
Talk:WGY-FM

message: I just found this while patrolling images. ~ BigrTex 03:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image for article 
Talk:Lawndale, Logan County, Illinois

message: I saw the entry for the Lawndale Incident on the page.  I don't know if the source is a legitmate source.  I have never heard of the incident, but will ask someone here in Logan County, Illinois, where I live.  It seems like if it were true I would have heard of it.  Kenallen 20:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Lawndale Incident
Talk:List of companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange

message: Here is the complete list.  I pasted it onto a spreadsheet and count 497 companies.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright I've replaced the article with the complete list.  If anybody know some fancy Perl, please wikilink the companies and just generally make the list look better.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 04:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a complete list
Talk:Project Genie

message: Does anyone have any idea what the SDS 940 has to do with Project Genie?  The entry jumps from Project Genie to the hardware system without any connection between the two.  I'm not a computer specialist, so I'm not familiar with any of this stuff.  Also, were the two doctors directors of Project Genie or the creation of the SDS 940?  This is a little bit confusing.129.176.151.6 04:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The SDS 940 was the product sold based on the research of the project. Still needs work but should be better. W Nowicki (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree that the article is confusing. I would like to see more elaboration of how much of Project Genie involved creation of new hardware vs. using the (pre-existing?) SDS 930. Also, I'd like to see more about the software aspects of Project Genie (if any). Riordanmr (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Project vs. product
Talk:Stephen Stanko

message: Sounds like the Chamber of Commerce edited the intro.  I'm sure Stanko wasn't great publicity for them, but a wiki article is not the way to address it.  Or is this a term of art regarding urban areas?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.146.252.218 (talk) 07:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A great small town"? 
Talk:American lower class

message: I just started this article and am not anywhere near finished. Please be patient and feel to chip in if you have reliable sources (e.g. college level textbook) on the subject handy. Regards, Signaturebrendel 04:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not finished