Talk:Educational assessment

message: I read this article with great interest. Whoever wrote it, contributed to it or knows something about the subject, I've got eight (yes, 8) questions (as always, they are real rather than rhetorical):
(1) Why are so many capital letters used? (Educational Evaluation, <-- wikified to Educational evaluation(Rfrisbietalk 21:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: This section is unreferenced and appears to be either plagiarism or original research. Can anyone re-write it, citing references, to improve the section? If it becomes any longer, it should probably be its own article. Chris53516 13:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is original research, taken from a book I am writing on assessment, offered as a donation to Wikipedia. It is chronologically inappropriate to move it to the end of the article. --Bobby 13:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: This content does not belong here, but in its own article. Chris53516 13:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content that deserves its own article 

message: The material in Course evaluation is redundant and overlapping with this page. The term assessment is more widely used and is the broader category. Therefore, the Course evaluation material should be merged with Assessment. —Chris53516 (Talk) 16:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Course evaluation]] etc 

message: :*Moved by Adavis444 (talk) 08:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment left above Table of Contents 

message: It would be nice if IMS QTI could handle pronunciation assessments.HowDoIUseUnifiedLogin? (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do people feel about IMS [[QTI]]? 

message: This article states:
"Ipsative assessment is self comparison either in the same domain over time, or comparative to other domains within the same student."
But that doesn't appear to be the difinition (temporal comparison) as in the link to Ipsativehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipsative_assessment  —Preceding unsignedcomment added by Davidakoontz (talk •contribs) 22:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ipsative 

message: This article seems to be biased towards educational assessment, which is certainly one type of assessment, but not the only. Psychological assessment is another. Perhaps the article should take into consideration that the broad notion of assessment, or should have disambiguation to point to a new article on psychological assessment, for example. --1000Faces(talk) 00:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychological Assessment 

message: I have posted a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. --WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 20:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing 

message: I don't believe it is good practice to refer to a different reference collection to try to explain alternative notions of a concept. For understanding assessment, this section should either cite sources of how people have conceptualized alternative definitions of educational assessment, or situate educational assessment in the general area of assessment (be that psychological or otherwise). This can be done by referring to other Wikipedia articles as well as outside sources. 
For the time being, does anyone have thoughts about how to best replace the Mirriam-Webster definition while a more thorough "alternative meanings" section may be constructed?
Mattsenate (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Meanings Needs Revision 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Educational assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120529041906/http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/pdf/V38N7_CulturallyCompetentAssessment.pdf to http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/pdf/V38N7_CulturallyCompetentAssessment.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Educational assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090226164716/http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/id/assess/purposes.html to http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/id/assess/purposes.html
*Added  tag to http://dailybruin.ucla.edu/stories/2003/mar/18/reform-education-not-exit-exam/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: General principles of assessment is an overlapping stub, where the topic is best discussed here (Educational assessment). I therefore suggest a merge in. Klbrain (talk) 10:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, a main article on assessment/measurement should definitely elaborate on the general principles of assessment. Moreover, the principles listed are not the most authoritative available... Sda030 (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 14:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal