lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stockport

message: In my opinion, relevant information should be included under the 'Divisions and suburbs' sub-heading in the 'Geography' tab of the article as it looks strange having an empty sub-heading within the section. In my opinion, if information can't be put into it, the sub-heading should be deleted. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The subsection appears empty to readers on smartphones, but actually does contain two navboxes which other readers can see. But I've removed the subheading as it isn't really necessary. -- Dr Greg  talk  21:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Divisions and suburbs' sub-heading in the 'Geography' tab of the article should contain text underneath it 

message: Editors need to back up a claim with sources. 230k plus population is utterly ludicrous. It make it bigger then Bolton which Stockport  is not and that's been left unchallenged without a 2021 census source to back it. DragonofBatley (talk) 18:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: Re: "When Lombe tried to renew his patent in 1732, silk spinners from towns..."
I'm confused because John Lombe supposedly died in 1722, assassinated by a woman hired by the Italians who believed he stole the design for their invention, the silk thrower, Can someone please clarify? The subject of the paragraph is John Lombe, and in fact he is the only Lombe mentioned in the article. But could it be a relative? Or a different year? Or,..????  ObadiahKatz (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't Lombe Assassinated 10 years Prior to the Event Mentioned? 

message: This article contradicts the Stockport County F.C one, as it claims Stockport originally meant hamlet with a market but that article claims the name of the town is derived from the De Stokeport family. Which one is correct? Overlordnat1 (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are referenced, but surely the family name "De Stokeport" indicates that they were "from Stokeport" and so the contradiction is just an issue of which came first.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There are a few things I’m unsure about or that seem a bit dubious that I’ve started a discussion about on Wiktionary’s Etymological Scriptorium. See the following link Overlordnat1 (talk) 11:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Etymology
Talk:Steering

message: Much of the article relies on primary sources such as websites of automakers: ZF, BMW, Renault, Porsche, Audi, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Thrust... Pretty much everything before the steer-by-wire section is reliant on primary sources, and everything after it is unsourced. HueSurname (talk) 02:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overreliance on primay sources and general lack of sources 

message: ref https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/2423 pp1-7 does not say bicycle steering is primarily via turning the handlebars. Greglocock (talk) 05:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it doesn't. As for how a bicycles actually steers, see Bicycle and motorcycle dynamics for a reasonable explanation of the complex dynamics involved. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The idiotic photo of a bike with training wheels. 

message: In the first “Steer by Wire” section, the article states that Tesla’s Cybertruck is the first automotive vehicle to enter production with steer by wire in place, despite the section “Steer by Wire” section detailing that the Infiniti Q50 and Q60 have had steer by wire since 2013. The second section also mentions the Lexus RZ 450e and Toyota bZ4X also having it since 2022 or so. Vehicles with rear-wheel steering also used steer by wire prior to those. 
It also seems unnecessary to include the Cybertruck in the “speed-sensitive steering” category, considering the technology has been in place for quite some time and the Cybertruck doesn’t add anything particularly notable in the space. Kevinsja (talk) 04:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two “Steer by Wire” sections, Inaccurate Cybertruck Statements
Talk:Gould

message: A brief section (sourced for verification, not speculation) about the historical/genealogical origins of the Gould surname would be an asset to this  article.   Athænara  ✉ 22:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins of Gould name

message: What is the rationale for listing people here instead of at Gould (name)? It seems a fairly arbitrary collection. Si Trew (talk) 06:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The list of names here should be merged into Gould (name). - Gothicfilm (talk) 06:35, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Agreed; and done. Alafarge (talk) 15:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  People
Talk:American Impressionism

message: Hi fellow page followers! I will be inputting some of my changes to the article soon! Jphansen34 (talk) 18:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Art Librarianship
Talk:Russian cruiser Varyag (1899)

message: Was she commissioned on 2 or 14 January 1901? Both dates are given. Drutt (talk) 17:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (A belated replyy): Both are correct; Jan 2 will be the contemporary Russian date in the Julian calendar, Jan 14 is the equivalent Gregorian date in use everywhere else (such as at William Cramp’s in the US). Xyl 54 (talk) 20:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Japanese cruiser Soya should be merged with this article. We don't need two articles about the same ship. DoctorKubla (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The cruiser is a kind of fetish in Russia. Her military failure is overcompensated by excessive use of word “heroic” in propaganda, up to the level of complete junk. Too much of this word in this article. As a result, it is not neutral. Just count the word "heroic" in this article and compare it to articles on other battleships in Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.29.60 (talk) 10:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an interesting subject and I will look into it (maybe 5½ years too late) ..  is there an accepted and objective definition of this "heroic" in a military context? Of course, it sounds like puffery. But the concept of military heroism is very real and widespread. Fishing Publication (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much of "heroism" 

message: Should the pages Russian cruiser Varyag (1899) and Japanese cruiser Soya be merged as they are the same ship?  Thanks for your feedback! Annwfwn (talk) Annwfwn (talk) 16:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they should be merged. Generally, there should only be one article for a given ship. Occasionally there are situations where the ship is very notable under more than one name so two articles are warranted ( and  are the most obvious example), but that's not the case here. Parsecboy (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Rock Against Bush

message: random comment form random person- there arent any plans for a vol.3. DELETED!!!!!
:: Evidence?
:: Where did the release date of 18 Oct 2006 for Volume 3 come from? I'm dubious cos it's not listed on either Punk Voter or the Fat Wreck site. I noticed that the previous compilation, PROTECT: A Benefit for the National Association to Protect Children was released on 18 Oct 2005. Could this be a mix-up?  Gram 15:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vol 3.

message: Really?  Does such a thing really exist in the U.S.?  (Other than maybe one or two people.)  Do you have conservative punk bands?  I've never heard of anybody/anything in the U.K. that could be called 'conversative punk' anyway.  Though T. Blair did once use 'If The Kids Are United' as a backing tune (New Labour = Conservative here, IMHO.)
:Dude are you kidding? There're like twelve dudes in my class who're in a conservative punk band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.227.95.138 (talk) 19:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservative Punks?
Talk:Second Doctor

message: Worth mentioning, perhaps, but not under Story Style?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.57.24 (talk) 21:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Both Peter Davison and Colin Baker, who played the Fifth Doctor and Sixth Doctor respectively, have stated that the Second Doctor is their favourite." 

message: The infobox lists the Second Doctor's tenure as starting on 29 October 1966, the date he appeared in the final episode of The Tenth Planet. For internal consistency within the infobox, and to match the table at , I think the date should be 5 November 1966, when the first episode of The Power of the Daleks aired.--Trystan (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See reply at Talk:Fourth_Doctor#Tenure_start_date. MarnetteD|Talk 18:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenure start date
Talk:Mass marketing

message: "Mass-marketing is the process of widely marketing a mass-produced item." - (mass marketing)
I question this definition. It seems to limit the word "mass" primarily to the product, only tangentially touching on the marketing method - "widely marketing", and ignores the customer.
Mass marketing can just as well apply to a single product made by hand or produced singly as orders arrive. The most important part of the definition hinges on the marketing method - the mass media - and the target audience - the masses.
Whether the product is mass-produced is not decisive, although most practical. 
A good example: "Simultaneous standardized marketing to a very large target market through mass media."
-- Fyslee 09:30, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. Didn't the teacher tell you not to use the word itself in the definition? --Emana 16:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable definition 

message: Another objection is that in principle the quality and durability of the product is irrelevant. A product of superior quality and durability can easily be "massly" marketed to the masses". That the marketed product may often be of inferior quality and durability is another matter. That's life.....;-)
-- Fyslee 09:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality and durability are irrelevant to the question 

message: *http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_marketing&diff=34352507&oldid=29573766
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_marketing&diff=next&oldid=34352507
-- Fyslee 11:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My changes to this article 

message: Sugar, produced by slave labour, was the first mass marketed product in human history (according to Robin Blackburn). True or false? —Pengo 04:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First mass marketing? 

message: The sentence structure and tone of the article feel like a first draft. For example, "The goal is when a consumer has the option to select a tube of toothpaste that the consumer would remember the product which was marketed". 47.148.173.205 (talk) 03:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall grammar and tone are poor
Talk:Sal Buscema

message: http://www.spidermancrawlspace.com/wordpress/2009/01/15/podcast-56-honoring-sal-buscema-with-tom-defalco-and-ron-frenz/
Source
--208.255.118.242 (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First work was not in avengers 
Talk:Applied anthropology

message: I've done some quick work to the page... this page was and is kind of a mess.  I've fixed up the section headings so they're in-line with Wikipedia norms, and cleaned up the refs as best i could.  i removed one, because honestly it was such a broad ref for such broad information, i just did not have the time to track down what was meant by the cite in the first place.  i'd like to work on this article in my free time, but that's laughable at least for the next week as i put together my Master's thesis.  Anyone else who wants to dive in and help would be greatly welcomed!! Kethryvis (talk) 23:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs are a mess
Talk:Seattle General Strike

message: Other than in the introduction, there seems to be nothing about the wage controls themselves.  It's a big hole in the article. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The controls themselves 

message: Sources as summarized by Google n-grams (also these n-grams) are mostly lower case.  Dicklyon (talk) 04:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence

message: I tried to revert vandalism from 4th and 5th February edits but it won't let me for some reason (some Wikipelli thing reverts my edit). The start of the article should say "an unsuccessful" and not "a successful". Someone please fix this. 77.222.27.61 (talk) 23:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what in the article can we determine that the strike was successful (or unsuccessful)? —C.Fred (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It says in the article that the result was arrests of workers and start of Red Scare. Original article says "unsuccessful", someone vandalized a few days ago. 77.222.27.61 (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix vandalism from February 4th
Talk:Picard theorem

message: In various wave-scattering related papers the cite "Picard's theorem" as a way of finding the range of a linear operator. E.g. here:  This seems to be different to the other Picard theorems already detailed. Shall I add a new page for it, or just add it on to this? 155.198.65.73 (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existence of Solutions to Linear Operators 

message: One inaccurate sentence is as follows:
"In the case where the values of f are missing a single point, this point are called lacunary values of the function."
Well, no. In the case where the values of f are missing any points, such points are called "lacunary values" of the function.
And this sentence has no content:
"As with the little theorem, the (at most two) points that are not attained are lacunary values of the function. "
Sentences like these are misleading and create more confusion than anything else. I hope someone knowledgeable on this subject can improve the writing.50.234.60.130 (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  One sentence is inaccurate, the other has no content.
Talk:Black Like Me (1961)

message: I added, "In 1964 "Black Like Me" was made into a film staring James Whitmore." It's been a few years since I've seen the film, but there's an entry for it at IMDB. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057889/ - Kevingarcia 18:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: film

message: Wow. Everything about the book is in this article except the tinest inkling of its actual contents. Don't people read any more? (I'm re-reading it now, three decades after devouring it in my teen years.)
Let's put in a bit about what led Griffin to his 6-week project: what motivated him and what he hoped to accomplish. How did he conduct himself, and what did he find?
He was a very careful observer - actually served as a military obsever or is that forward observer in the U.S. military during WWII. He notices small details, as well as having a keen perception for people's moods. This would suit him ideally for his project. (Hmm. Did he have a name for his project?) --Uncle Ed 15:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis
Talk:Felix Hausdorff

message: Much of this reads like something written by a native German speaker. Needs thorough revision.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.70.251.158 (talk) 15:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor English 

message: It says that Hausdorff's library was sold by "his" son. I presume that this is referring back to the previous paragraph and talking about the son of Hausdorff's lawyer, but only because the article earlier claims that Hausdorff's only child was a daughter. Anyone who missed that would assume it was talking about the son of Hausdorff. Is my interpretation correct?MathHisSci (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "His" son? 

message: In the paragraph
"Hausdorff's general products and powers of cardinalities had led him to the concept of partially ordered set. The question of whether any ordered subset of a partially ordered set is contained in a maximal ordered subset was answered in the positive by Hausdorff using the well-ordering theorem. This is the Hausdorff maximal principle. It follows not only from the well-ordering theorem (or from the (equivalent to this) axiom of choice), but it is, as it turned out, even to the axiom of choice are equivalent.[12]",
I believe the last sentence (marked in boldface) is incoherent and should be rewritten. (I do not know  enough about the subject to do it myself.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llsalcedo (talk • contribs) 22:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence needs rewriting
Talk:List of minor Doctor Who villains

message: is the fan spec stuff worth including? at least in such detail
:Probably not.  I'll see if I can winnow it down; as it is, it's disproportionate to the entry. —Josiah Rowe 20:34, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  War Chief 

message: Shouldn't Henry van Statten be listed under "S" instead of "V"?  I mean, you wouldn't file Ludwig van Beethoven under "V", would you? —Josiah Rowe 22:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I'll do it now.--Sean Black | Talk 22:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetizing 

message: We may be able to escape this unpleasant cycle of speculation and reversion.  A post at Outpost Gallifrey's forum (the spoiler section, be warned!) gives a specific date for "New Earth".  I haven't yet been able to find the source, but if this is confirmed we can revise the last sentence accordingly.  (Did you like how I managed to say that without letting on whether the OG source says it's before or after TEotW?) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:29, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you post the text either here or on my talkpage? I don't have an account for OG. I hope, however, that you won't alter it.--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 08:30, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Please see Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:TheDoctor10 Tim! (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A possible light at the end of this particular tunnel 

message: I've added this character, because I think it belongs here. However, I don't really know enough about it, so I've just put a link to the serial. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable than I will be able to fill in some details! 82.13.223.11 21:27, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Malus
Talk:Realtor

message: The correct usage should indicate that the word is a registered trademark. Polounit 05:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this page should redirect to: Real estate broker. A Realtor is a member of the National Association of Realtors and is not necessarily a real estate broker or vice versa. Suggest redirecting to the NAR page instead.Rbucich (talk) 19:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should not redirect to Real estate agent in general because it is misleading and incorrect. Real estate agent now contains a section clarifying the difference between realtor and agent/broker/salesperson. That specific section seems to be a much more reasonable target. Toddst1 (talk) 15:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Concern about target
Talk:Occupational Safety and Health Administration

message: What is the minimum Overtime hours A state employee has to work A day They have the right To walk out the door And say my shift is done I have employees working up to 16 hours a day With an hour and 1⁄2 of a break 2607:FB91:1210:8A61:8C08:B855:AB53:32D7 (talk) 23:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtime 

message: — Assignment last updated by SelahWillis (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Industrial Hygiene
Talk:John McAfee

message: Please remove this:
 shortly after his extradition to the U.S. was authorized by the Spanish National Court.
and add this:
 shortly after the Spanish National Court authorized his extradition to the U.S.
It's solely a switch from passive to active voice. 49.198.51.54 (talk) 01:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2022 

message: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C5-1/ALDE_00013692/
How could John McAfee run for President as he was not born in the USA? Htrowsle (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a fair amount of controversy over what exactly "natural born citizen" means; I believe the U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on it. There have been various serious presidential contenders who were born outside of the U.S., most recently Ted Cruz, so it's not obvious that McAfee was ineligible. Korny O'Near (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  President?
Talk:Anthem (Less Than Jake album)

message: Deleted the line "* "Surrender" was featured on an episode of Scrubs." because the LTJ version is not the one featured. Cheap Trick's original was featured in Scrubs.
Who actually is Carter Graham? There's no citation for that, and googling the name turns up nothing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.177.66.219 (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leviathan (Mastodon album)

message: I always thought the song was titled "Island", but according to the mastodon official website, the song is "Iceland", and the lyrics reflect this.  I checked some other sources (Amazon for one) and some list it as Island.  Is this just a massive error? For now, I'm gong to edit it to reflect the official website.LtCrumpet (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island/Iceland 

message: it closely resembles an album by cover by a band that i cant for the life of me remember, nor can i remember the album title, or the site i saw. if i ever figure it out ill get back to you guys♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cover 

message: in the movie "Choke", Danny actually wears a tshirt with the Blood Mountain artwork  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.10.216.109 (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pop culture 

message: Removed.
*The Dwarf (Positive) link
Seegoon (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable review 
Talk:Transform (Powerman 5000 album)

message: Punk Rock?
*Yeah, I know. The Punk Rock tags have now been reverted back to their original Alternative Metal tags. Though it is true that this album showed the band to be heading towards Punk Rock and had a Punk taste to it, it most certainly wouldn't qualify as a Punk Rock album, unlike their following title Destroy What You Enjoy which most certainly qualifies as Punk Rock. Livingston 13:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Metal: