Talk:Chinese Lunar Exploration Program

message: That article is a mess. It needs serious clean-up. Themanwithoutapast 11:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the logo for the program, those grey spots. Do they look like footprints to anyone?
Roswell Crash Survivor 03:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They certainly do.  That was my first thought.  :)  --EarthPerson 00:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Footprints on icon

message: The name of the full program is Chinese Lunar Exploration Program and not Chang'e. Chang'e is just part of the full program, specifically the Chang'e 1 vessel. So all things Chang'e 1 related are now on a specific page, and general info is here. Ricnun 01:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Lunar Exploration Program

message: There's some mention of iron and helium-3 - the article should explain whether the planned Moon landers and base will actually involve industrial exploitation or whether this is just a long-range desire of some of the people involved. 70.15.116.59 04:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial projects 

message: Thre are American skeptics that will tell you America has never been to the moon.  Their thought is that is was all made up in a Hollywood basement.  I would love to hear if this irreverent phobia is also taking place now, in China.  The contrasts might make the basis for some work in psychology or news article.  If nothing else, show how similar we are. comment added by Imlookingnow 20:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vanilla malt: Is this exploration program really going to make vanilla malt on the moon?This sounds like a joke to meWai Hong 18:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeptics 

message: Anyone know the story on this? "China's space program has defended a photo of the moon's surface taken by its lunar probe as authentic, dismissing critics who suggested it had been copied from a similar image captured by a U.S. orbiter." -- http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071203/ap_on_re_as/china_lunar_skeptics_2 Please followup at Talk:Chang'e 1#China says lunar image authentic Ewlyahoocom (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  China says lunar image authentic 

message: :Image:Exploration of the Moon, People's Republic of China.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Exploration of the Moon, People's Republic of China.jpg

message: Does anyone else think the line: "Unlike the obviously unrealistic American lunar base concepts,..." seems somewhat, you know, not neutral. At all. Especially sans evidence to support these supposed unrealistic aspects, beyond a CNSA picture with no background or explanation. I'm sure a number of people would probably take great offense to an unsupported accusation like that as well. At the very least, it would probably be better to change it to something decidedly less offensive, even if the basic idea remains. Thesillyshmo (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are info about CZ-7, available on the web; it only shows your own limits. 218.102.39.153 (talk)17:23, 25 September 2008 (PRCT)
As an aerospace systems engineer working as a "rocket scientist," I must concur with whoever marked the section "New Moon rocket" as dubious.  The reported 500-ton launch capability planned for this new Long March vehicle (CZ-7 maybe) is absurd, IMHO.  Assuming this is the launch capability to LEO, it is an order of magnitude greater than any current operational vehicle, more than 4 times the payload of the Saturn V, and 2-3 times the planned payload for Ares V or any other Super Heavy Lift vehicle concept I've seen (see Comparison of heavy lift launch systems and Astronautix.com).  Also, the links to the supporting references on this section are dead, although I haven't checked the way-back machine.  I propose that this sentence-section be deleted unless somebody can find what 2006 conference Mr. Zhang attended where he made his claim, or a paper written by him on the topic.  I also recommend ignoring 218.102.39.153 as he/she appears to be a Wiki-vandal based in Hong Kong, unless he can provide a link to the info on about the CZ-7 he found "available on the web." 129.123.8.30 (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent bias 

message: I was the one who deleted the Manned Mission section. Here's why.
The only evidence for Chinese intent is a few public statements by space scientists and public officials that have never been supported by any official statements of the Chinese Space Program. The interpretation of the Chinese insignia is minor evidence and it's a sign of the weakness of this section that this was placed first in the section. Further, there's no indication that China has a CZ-7 in design. And a lunar rover need not be manned, I've seen a rover associated with discussion of the sample return mission. And the last paragraph (rambling about the US space program, radiation, and some minor quote (about digging in to reduce radiation exposure)) adds nothing to this section.
For whatever reasons, China has repeatedly denied that it has plans for manned lunar missions. So any such discussion of a lunar program is highly speculative. I won't have problems with a section that treats this situation accurately, but what I deleted, was deeply flawed and didn't accurately reflect what is currently known. -- KarlHallowell (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I deleted the "Manned Mission" section 

message: zh.wikipedia has this chart. I hope someone can translate this chart into English. It would help to understand some technical terms.114.37.143.183 (talk) 02:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization chart

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chinese Lunar Exploration Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015034940/http://www.clep.org.cn:80/ to http://www.clep.org.cn
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026112423/http://www.geog.umd.edu:80/ispmsrs2005/OuyangZiyuanAbs.htm to http://www.geog.umd.edu/ispmsrs2005/OuyangZiyuanAbs.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Chinese Lunar Exploration Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027132543/http://www.yndaily.com/html/20060317/news_88_1052407.html to http://www.yndaily.com/html/20060317/news_88_1052407.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66BhehmIE?url=http://news3.xinhuanet.com/tech/2007-07/07/content_6340313.htm to http://news3.xinhuanet.com/tech/2007-07/07/content_6340313.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.clep.org.cn/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geog.umd.edu/ispmsrs2005/OuyangZiyuanAbs.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chinese Lunar Exploration Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070408085556/http://astronautix.com/craft/change.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/craft/change.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chinese Lunar Exploration Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230063935/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-12/16/c_132971252.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-12/16/c_132971252.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified