Talk:War elephant

message: It should perhaps be noted that there is no empirical proof that the elephant can move at a greater speed than 22 km/h, which nicely fits its biomechanically predicted top speed. But then, who knows what happens in the heat of battle? ;o)
MWAK--217.122.44.226 06:13, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: older entries

message: It is my understanding that the  Egyptians at Raphia had smaller elephants than the Asian ones used by Antiochus. I also believe that Hannibal's personal elephant was Asian (named the Syrian). Thus it appears that the Egyptians and Carthaginian elephants were smaller than the Asian ones. In which case, they could not have been using the African Savannah elephant, which is larger. I would like someone who knows better to clarify this.
:Hannibal used the barbary elephant, a small subspecies of savannah elephant from North Africa, now extinct. Egiptians use sometimes syrian (asian) elephants, and sometimes african elephants from Nubia. There are many ancient pictures of african war elephants with its characteristic big ears, like this.
:(Excuse me, I'm not a native english speaker)--Menah the Great 16:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was at Villa Giulia and remember a bit about the explanation about the plate. It was a memorial about the war against Pyrrhus. It was significant for Romans because of something. --Error 01:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All 3 were probably used by the Carthaginians my children. The osprey book "Armies of the Carthaginian Wars" states that the majority was Numidian bred North African war elephants, but the presence of massive, bush elephants from the Sudan cannot be denied.They were a minority as they were hard to tame, but Cqarthage had an active trans-Sasharan trade which provided the occasional tamed elephant. This prersence is proven in the book, and it is said that whilst forest were 2-man and 1-man, the bush elephants were 4 man with howdahs carrying an officer, a sarrissaman, and an archer, with a Mahout on the neck.The Asiatic elephant "most likely" existed as an even smaller minority. It is not proven, but Carthage and Ptolomaic Egypt (Egypt used lots of Asiatics and africans) had a thriving military trade deal from c.300BC to 241BC.60.228.53.39 06:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Osprey refers to sources. please cite them. Wandalstouring 10:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion about war elephants in use by Carthage and Egypt 

message: Zoological books say that war elephants were easily startled, so probably were mostly significant as ceremonial or psychological weapon.
*The historical sources clearly account for that risk, and record elephants turning on their own side in panic. Fastifex 08:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usability 

message: I've heard of elephants being used for logistics purposes by Angolan insurgents during the 70's. I think the U.S. Special Forces are trained to use them, along with other pack animals. Does anyone have a source for this? 66.133.180.21 05:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first seems anecdotally possible, although I've only found references to hunting them for ivory in order to finance military operations. The second seems highly unlikely to be taught as a generic skill. This rumor probably derives from this special forces manual which actually says they should not be used as they are an endangered species. On review, this seems citable. --Dhartung | Talk 03:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I've heard rumours of Vietnamese troops using elephants to haul heavy weapons and supplies and so they were therefore targeted by US forces during the Vietnam war. Can anyone shed any light on this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.201.151.3 (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in modern times? 

message: Can someone please write about elephants ion the medieval period, early modern and modern periods.
The medieval period was just as glorious with elephants.....just not in europe/africa.
And more is needed on asia.60.228.53.39 06:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have heard that the elephants occasionally had parts of their tusks sawn off and replaced with blades. Is this true? I got the information from a second-hand source, who claims to have seen the above-mentioned information on a recent television show.
Yes its true. I read it the book "The Dictionary of Ancient and Medieval Warfare". I forgot the author and publisher, but if someone wants to add this to the article, I can easily do so for the contributer.It is Indian and medieval.
This is just one interesting tidbit of later elephant warfare, which is why we mustn't ignore such later history. Im suprised this article was featured.60.228.53.39 06:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just Antiquity!!

message: So, the  elephant page says only males were war elephants but the war elephant page say either one.  Anyone *know* which it is? (Also posted to  elephant talk.) Nklatt 15:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I only heard of male elephants being used in combat, but Polybius mentions females among the elephants Hannibal had when crossing the Rhone. the argument was that thisway the males were easier to control because they followed a female that waseasier to control. Pyrrhus possibly had some female elephants with calves in battle(the females would defend the calf at all cost), I think there are some coins and possiblyLivy mentions the story (have to look for sources).Wandalstouring 13:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That same John Kistler book also confirms that Pyrrhus had females, although accepts that males were the norm.
According to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephant#Domestication_and_use
females where never used for war because they would run away. -Daniel T  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.98.235 (talk) 02:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female troops? 

message: ===In literature===
*Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book contains two stories in which war elephants appear, "Toomai of the Elephants" and "Her Majesty's Servants".
*J. R. R. Tolkien's fictional war-beasts, the Mûmakil or Oliphaunts, are modelled after war elephants.
===In film===
*War elephants are featured in a key scene in the 2001 Thai film, The Legend of Suriyothai.
* They also have a key scene of Oliver Stone's 2004 film Alexander 
*Khan Kluay, a 2006 animated depicts the life of a baby elephant who grows up to become the war elephant for King Naresuan.
===In games===
*In Rome: Total War war elephants are used by some of the factions.
* In Medieval II: Total War, the Timurid hordes utilize war elephants.
*In the MMORPG World of Warcraft expansion, the new Draenei race utilizes a mount that is similar to a war elephant.
*In Age of Empires the war elephant is a powerful mêlée unit that tramples infantry. It also appears as a unique castle unit in Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings.
*War elephants appeared in Civilization IV as a powerful alternative to mounted units for countries that did not have access to horses.
*War elephants are a possible mount in the Dynasty Warriors games, able to push down barriers and trample foes beneath them.
----
I think it is good idea to just remove the section, since it is possibly one of the reasons the article lost FA status.--OrbitOne  [Talk|Babel] 21:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully, such stuff gets removed from any article. If this is notable, write an article about it, if not it isn't information we need or do you consider tolist every book/video/game where a freaking war elephant jumps out of the bushes.Same would be likelisting Donald Duck, Scrooge McDuck and all other Disney ducks in the article on ducks. Wandalstouring 17:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: War elephants in popular culture

message: *In Rome: Total War war elephants are used by some of the factions.
* In Medieval II: Total War, the Timurid hordes utilize war elephants.
*In the MMORPG World of Warcraft expansion, the new Draenei race utilizes a mount that is similar to a war elephant.
*In Age of Empires the war elephant is a powerful mêlée unit that tramples infantry. It also appears as a unique castle unit in Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings.
*War elephants appeared in Civilization IV as a powerful alternative to mounted units for countries that did not have access to horses.
*War elephants are a possible mount in the Dynasty Warriors games, able to push down barriers and trample foes beneath them.
----
I think it is good idea to just remove the section, since it is possibly one of the reasons the article lost FA status.--OrbitOne  [Talk|Babel] 21:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully, such stuff gets removed from any article. If this is notable, write an article about it, if not it isn't information we need or do you consider tolist every book/video/game where a freaking war elephant jumps out of the bushes.Same would be likelisting Donald Duck, Scrooge McDuck and all other Disney ducks in the article on ducks. Wandalstouring 17:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In games

message: In Medieval 2: Total War, the Timiruds have an elephant unit with cannons on their backs
Can anyone confirm the realism of this? Or is this fake?
I hate to be horrible about this but hahahahahhaa, is the only way I can think to respond. 170.65.188.1 04:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, I didn't see this comment before I added the contradiction stuff.  Someone made an article about the Medieval 2 elephants, and that article states that they didn't exist and it was a "snafu" by someone at Creative Assembly (the company that made the game).  This article does mention that elephants fitted with culverins did exist.  Hence the contradiction.  :) --DarthBinky 04:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannons mounted on elephants? 

message: The article for cannon elephants states in no uncertain terms that elephants with cannons mounted on their backs did not exist; this article states that they did.  I have a feeling that this article is the correct one, but thought I'd point it out so someone more knowledgeable than I can fix it.  Cheers --DarthBinky 04:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the crossbow article is an photograph of an ancient relief showing an elephant with a heavy arcuballista on his back.  Not quite a cannon, but a similar concept and comparable to a very light cannon. Wandalstouring 14:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The Forest elephant page says that 'war elephant' is a species. This article is about the.. unit... or profession. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 02:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species 

message: Is Pyrrhic victory really the correct discription of the battle of Hydaspes?
I think not "A Pyrrhic victory is a victory with devastating cost to the victor" Alexander lost as most ten percent of his army mostly infantry now I'm not saying thats not steep loses but thats no crippling, lets look at the citation used: 
"But this last combat with Porus took off the edge of the Macedonians' courage, and stayed their further progress into India. For having found it hard enough to defeat an enemy who brought but twenty thousand foot and two thousand horse into the field, they thought they had reason to oppose Alexander's design of leading them on to pass the Ganges, too, which they were told was thirty-two furlongs broad and a fathom deep, and the banks on the further side covered with multitudes of enemies."
Note it refers to the subsequent mutiny not actually the battle, though in fairness it directly relates the mutiny to the battle, what must however be remembered is the Macedonian mutinied multiple times during Alexanders campaign they had left home ten years ago they had fought god knows how many battles in total, they had defeated Persia the whole point of leaving Macedonia they were now running around the middle of no where getting trappled on by elephants, they were annoyed. 
Even if we claim that Alexander was stop solely by this battle it's not exactly a devastating lose to the victor they had won the campaign against Porus they just turned around and went home afterwards with their army mostly intact (well at least until Gedrosia) how does that constitute devasating. Even if we look at it solely from Alexander's view point he wasn't exactly crushed by it if you look at other events he had way further to go on the despair scale.
Then the article goes on to say it was the elephants that were responsible for halting Alexander citing same bit of Plutarch  note "twenty thousand foot and two thousand horse", its debatable but I don't really have a problem with it though, elephants trappling people is after all what the battles famous for, over simplified but not exactly wrong. 
Hence I kept that section and conservatively clipped off the prior Pyrrhic victory as it isn't one.....
: I wonder whether Alexander ever had any intention of going further. He never went outside the boundaries of the Persian empire, which seems to have been what he wanted. Possibly the world-conqueror thing was a later invention. PiCo (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: I've done a bit of general tidying up work, especially on the paragraph structures in various places - see what you think. Full details as follows.
I've tightened up the intro very slightly, and moved a couple of clauses into the main article.
On the history sections, I've done some extensive work on the paragraph structure, which had become very loose in places over time (but tried to keep the underlying sentence structures and content intact whereever possible), and tried to tidy up the odd word or two. I've broken down Antiquity into three sections, given its length, and chased down some additional references. I've added a little bit on the Siamese and Vietnamese use of elephants in the modern period (late 19th century). I've taken out the (admittedly rather nice) "war elephants as a metaphor for political forces" picture, as it didn't seem to link in, and was also a picture of an elephant-mounted hunt, rather than a war elephant per se.
On the tactics section, a little tidying around the edges, and some work on paragraph structure and references towards the end.
I've combined the 'gaming pieces' and 'surviving relics' into a single 'cultural legacy bit', and added a little on architectural legacies as well, aiming to lose the list style in the process. See what you think.
I've then added a full references section at the end.
I hope that I've avoided any pit falls on the issues raised in the discussions above, --Hchc2009 (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to paragraph structure etc. 

message: Elephants were used to move some artillery around. Should this be mentioned?©Geni 00:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely, it should be in the tactics section. Easier transport of artillery was a significant advantage during those times.Meatsgains (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1868 Expedition to Abyssinia

message: Marked this as dubious, both because I believe this is a myth, and because the entry goes on to mention armour protection.—Pawyilee (talk) 08:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Elephant#Skin An elephant's skin is generally very tough.... Although tough, an elephant's skin is very sensitive.—Pawyilee (talk) 08:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: considering the durability of animal skin and the thickness of an elephants hide 1 inch on back and head (Shoshani, pp. 66–67.) its possible it could provide small arms such as a gladious or arrows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bolvark (talk • contribs) 08:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The elephants' thick hide gave them considerable protection 

message: Other than the pictures, there needs to be a mention of the Mughal's use of elephants. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use during the Mughals 

message: "The Han Dynasty of the 2nd century BC fought against Nanyue and Yue kingdoms of South East Asia (ancient proto Sino-Vietnamese) that did employ war elephants. Common tactics used to repel these elephants included massed crossbow or artillery fire." Artillery in the 2nd century BC? PiCo (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd century BC artillery 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on War elephant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517084635/http://history.boisestate.edu/westciv/grecult/alexander.txt to http://history.boisestate.edu/westciv/grecult/alexander.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to Second_French_intervention_in_Mexico#Egyptian_Auxiliary_Corps_January_1863, 13 Canon Elephants were used in Mexico. --Error (talk) 02:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Current:
:..., calls its bishop Gaja, meaning elephant in Sanskrit; it is still called an elephant in Chinese chess. Also in Arabic – and derived from it, in Spanish – the bishop piece is called al-fil, Arabic for "elephant"; in Russian, too, the bishop piece is an elephant (Слон). In Bengali, the bishop is called hati, Bengali for "elephant".
This repeats four times "In xxx, the bishop is called elephant"... How about:
:..., calls its bishop Gaja, meaning elephant in Sanskrit. As consequence, the bishop is still called elephant in many other languages: in Arabic (al-fil) and derived from it, in Spanish (alfil), in Russian (Слон), Bengali (hati), and many others: see Chess piece#Piece_names.
The final link points to a list with "elephant" for 20 languages, if I count right. — MFH:Talk 03:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplification in Cultural legacy 

message: List of mechanical contraptions related to the "War elephant" has yet to be collected.
12:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contraption