Talk:Gaia Online/Archive 3

message: Gaia gold has no "lost value" people simply want old items and sealed letters more and there is a limited supply, if anything is going to be mentioned, it should be that many "gaia items" are becoming increasingly rarer. Statements like "Gaia gold is losing value" need to be backed up with sources, becuase otherwise they can be seen as the biased statements of anti-inflationists.
67.185.242.59 15:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, for awhile it was going down, but I only have my own eyes as evidence, and some articles on gaiacast (which doesn't have fact checkers, thus isn't sourceable). It's been less pronounced recently as they cut down on the farming bots. Spriteless 14:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Things like this could be track able and cite able later on with the new marketplace at hand.  Graphing of inflation rates is now possible.Pritchard 07:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I do agree that Gaia gold is losing value, mostly because of the Cash Shop and the Cash Cards you gan buy in the store now.  However, the value of sealeds has nothing to do with that.  Sealeds are more expensive than they used to be, once again, because of the Cash Shop.  With the evolution items costing sometimes $10, or the price of four sealeds, much less sealeds are being purchased.  Thus, their is a smaller supply and the price rises. Alphabet55 (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold value 

message: There should be a section about all the controversy generated by Gaia Online. For example their severe attitude on ban, the way it helps pedophile, etc. I can help if needed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.83.212.100 (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your contribution! Yes, many users have tried to add criticism/controversy sections, and none of them have succeeded in doing it in a way that is appropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability, wherein all ideas proposed must be able to be backed up by a reputable source. As of yet, no reputable sources have been found to report on the controversies created by Gaia Online other than user-testimonies, which are not reputable sources. Without any kind of verification for these ideas, they become Original Research, or personal ideas of editors that are expressed in the article. This, too, is not allowed on Wikipedia. So until we can find independent sources that discuss these controversies and criticisms that we can cite, having such a section is unfeasible for this article. However, if you can find some good ones, be sure to tell us about them! Thanks again for your ideas and contributions! – DroEsperanto 22:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good luck with that. Its nigh impossible.Silver seren 00:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, that seems to be the case. I've had a hard time of finding any sources other than administrator posts (which are tricky to cite as sources, since they're forum posts) and Gaia Online info pages (like "What is Gaia Gold?" or "Monthly Collectibles"). – Dok(talk|contribs) 01:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Can you tell us the website?Silver seren 14:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I think we all know what he means. 204.49.209.155 13:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Please let's not get into that here. Talk pages aren't for discussing the topic of article, but rather the article itself. – DroEsperanto(talk|contribs) 20:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't find that information verifiable or relevant to the article. Although forum posts are the only sources they have, posting them here would help some of us determine what or how he's trying to express this. When we have a better understanding of this, a "better" source might be more easily found.--Can Not 11:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Huh, semicolons are used for that, but why would "credit card, paypal, or regular mail" be a seperate list from "over the phone, or by text message?" I don't see what the difference between the 2 sets is, and the structure looks kind of cumbersome to me.Spriteless 12:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your edit. Roddyboy 05:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Me as well. Silver seren 18:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Semicolon Edit War (of like 2 edits) 

message: Should there be some mention of the promotion for The Last Mimzy? --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits) 16:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add the section but I can't find the official announcement for the promotion. Anyone know where it is? --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits | Email) 00:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it just be in the announcements forum further back?Silver seren 17:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You would think, but there's only a brief mention of it in the Feb 28 announement, which isn't specific enough. I vaguely remember there being something more specific like a newsletter, but there isn't one available in the newsletter archive. --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits | Email) 20:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...i'll go take a look and see if I can dig anything up.Silver seren 21:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Last Mimzy'' Promotion 

message: Deleted that section. Wikipedia is not a place to air personal grievances. 203.59.20.167 13:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Critisism

message: I'm fairly certain that some /b/tards from 4chan are about to raid this page, how do I put a lock up? --Greg 20:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whats "4chan"?Silver seren 12:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 4chan is a very large anonomous forums desended from 2channel. It is full of Japanophiles and breeds memes. They are likely still upset that Gaia copied the ORLY owl without permission. Because Gaia is unique in that, eh?Spriteless 17:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So...they're going to vandalize wikipedia because of it?....thats sadSilver seren 03:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gb2gaia, hopefully you'll be able to afford that really KAWAII ^_^ new top for your fag avatar with your fake money if you post enough.--NeroDrusus 09:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I would be insulted if I didn't realize that I was talking to someone who knew the word "kawaii". I'm hoping your a girl because otherwise...Silver seren 13:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Keep it civil and relevent to the article please. DarkSaber2k 13:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry...:( Silver seren 02:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lock

message: This is the second promotion with a quest on Gaia. And this time I've got a primary source to cite: http://www.gaiaonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26870833#1196176034.
I don't want to put it up myself, because I would rather wait until there's a reliable source for the Last Mimzy promotion and include both in one section. --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits | Email) 18:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't even see Quests on there...has no one descibed it yet at all? If you need the Last Mimzy one to do so, then i'll go search right now.Silver seren 02:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ''Tsubasa: Resevior Chronicle'' Promotion 

message: Knowing many avatar-based sites (IMVU, Meez, etc.), could anyone start a "See Also" section?
Rjsec4ever 19:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say probably not. These sites (or the articles about them) probably wouldn't enhance the reader's understanding of how Gaia Online works very much. Linking in the article to the article about avatar/doll sites, as has been done, should be sufficient. (Also: for more about See Also sections, see also Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#See_also.)– DroEsperanto(talk|contribs) 22:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention that the sites you spoke of bear little to no resemblance to Gaia Online. IMVU is a 3D Chat Room and not much else unless they've added a ton since I beta'd it. Gaia is much more encompassing. JBartus 12:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start a See Also section? 

message: Something should be mentioned about GAIA and Toyota working together towards the new feature. 71.193.246.98 23:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAIA Cars 

message: I just reverted the edit by Masterj1129, which was obvious vandalism. I have the feeling that we're going to get attacked overwhelmingly soon...Silver seren 22:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. Next time someone vandalizes this article, could whomever reverts it put one of the handy template messages on the offender's talk page? It would help admins keep track of repeat offenders. Also lets them know we notice them, and can be very sacharine about it. ^@^ Spriteless 17:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh...sorry...o_o;Silver seren 17:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: Yay! Would this go under avatar system, as it is about the avatar? Also, how much description of it should there be? You guys are picky on how much information there is. XPSilver seren 01:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We gots tattoos! 

message: I was reading this article and half of this article is useless clutter. "Gaia Online's forums also have a private messaging system." This is a STANDARD FEATURE of phpBB, nothing new needing emphasized. There are alot of places in the article where similar bits which should be on the phpBB page or some other page are in this article. JBartus 12:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, not all the people on Wiki know that. Maybe it should be added onto like, "a standard feature of phpBB". I mean, thats pretty simple. Oh darn...where's that be bold link again. XPSilver seren 14:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What I mean is that there is alot of this that talks about all of these things that are standard on phpBB that make it seem like they are unique additions the Gaia staff have added. JBartus 23:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: What community website doesn't have a PM system? But aside from that, there weren't any details that seemed like they need to be removed. It does sound rather commercial-like presently, but I think that's fine until someone can rewrite it a little better. --TerraGamerX 01:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless Clutter 

message: Instead of removing sections of the article, why not discuss whether they should be removed or not? And here's a better idea: Why not try and find sources that will help keeping the content on Wikipedia instead of just removing it? How are we going to improve this article when even stuff that I had sources on, gets deleted? The article as it is now doesn't have the necessary information such as the gold system and it doesn't help the least to people who wants to learn more about Gaia Online. 81.233.5.117 20:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, shouldn't you have discussed it first as well?Silver seren 23:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's discuss it now? Give me a good reason as to why the avatar section as an example gets to stay in the article even though it lacks sources and why is my gold section (which had sources, mind you) removed and the stuff I wrote about the games? Okay, so the stuff I wrote about games doesn't have sources and should be removed? Fair enough. Then I'll take the time to remove the other bits like the avatar section too since that lack sources as well. And while I'm at it; You have gotten the games all wrong. There are 7 games, and I repeat, 7 games. Not 8 as it states in the article. I changed this to 7 but apparently some guy disagrees with this, so I'll take it to the discussions now. Go to Gaia's website, hover your mouse on the "Game" tab and start counting how many links that will show up. 7. The 8th game that you are talking about is the cinemas, which is not a game. Gaia themselves do not add the cinemas under the game section, and honestly, what kind of game values does the cinema contain? So I'd like to have this fixed. 81.233.5.117 23:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, and Cinemas lets you light your buddies on fire and/or smooch them, which is more game like than towns, the glorified chatroom. But each game doesn't deserve it's own section, and description. Wikipedia isn't a game guide, but this is. Spriteless 01:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I guess you know more about this Wikipedia than I do. I can understand if some of them aren't reliable and all that, but isn't their anything of what I wrote that can be used for the article? If not, what can I do to make the content stay? I'd really like to improve the article to get around the most basic things of Gaia Online. If sources is a problem, would it then be helpful if we got some admins/mods to make some kind of official threads that we can cite as sources? And doesn't the other games need a little detail? (oh yeah, by the way, I'm 81.233.5.117; I'm just too lazy to log in to this account but I'll try for the future) BadSp00n 01:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put the gold system back in, but reworded it. Game info is generally to 'crufty' when it includes how to win, what you win, in great detail that wouldn't be helpfull to someone who doesn't know what Gaia Online is already. Spriteless 15:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Here's the list of things specifically to keep out. It links to other things, but it's all just guidelines; don't worry. Anything add will be edited mercilessly, as noted at the bottom of the edit page. :) So it will fit wikipedia eventually. Spriteless 18:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. :) BadSp00n 23:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting??? 

message: I don't think this is appropriate to be placed in this article. Wachapon2 00:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you see somehting like that, feel free to delete it as unsourced, unverifiable, and un-neutral point of view. I did. Spriteless 20:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh ok! Will do next time. Wachapon2 23:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Recognized? 

message: Does anybody think it is appropriate to note Gaia's role in the Harry Potter spoilers fiasco, since it was mentioned in a few newspapers/apparently on TV? Relevant links: China Daily.com
Mercury News
CNN.comStar-TribuneSimplysitesny Take your pick, the content is all roughly the same. Whitetrashpalace 19:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is Gaia any more apart of it than any other forum, like 4chan or YTMND? It isn't really an integral part of Gaia, asides from Gaia's usual attraction to internet fad/memes. Spriteless 19:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought Gaia was on the point of being sued about it? Anyways...maybe one sentence mention?Silver seren 19:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gaia is mentioned an article about Harry Potter, which list many sites that Scholastic subpoena'd, including photobucket and  and that they complied with it. That means they aren't getting sued. It easily could go in a link in the bottom, or if there's an article on the spoilers, or section on the book's article... I don't know how to fit it in the article otherwise, but if you do, have at. :) Spriteless 21:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm busy trying to save an article from deletion. Sorry, but i'll have to do it later.Silver seren 21:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking, maybe a "Gaia Online in the News" section would be a good place to put this information. I don't know if there's enough (or any) other 'official' documentation of Gaia Online to make such a section worthwhile, however. Whitetrashpalace 17:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: Harry Potter controversy.

message: A new Magic: The Gathering quest has started very recently, I think should it be mentioned in the section about sponsored quests.
Ejak 04:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its very interesting that Wizards of the Coast is working with Gaia...or sponsoring at least. It seems like Gaia is getting bigger things every day. Would we consider this one more important than the others though?Silver seren 14:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic: The Gathering sponsors quest 

message: So with the ridiculous vandalism this page has been receiving lately, shouldn't it be protected? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WingedOutlaw (talk • contribs) 01:05, August 2, 2007
:With the recent outbreaks in vandalism, i'm inclined to agree. I think it should be semi-protected, but not fully.Silver seren 23:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed a link to the infamous 4chan Meme Meat Spin, which was posted in the official section, I really do think this should be protected to avoid any more vandalism from the 4chan Anons.EmoHobo 04:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A few minutes ago, I had to change the link for Gaia Online's login page because the last user to edit it replaced the URL of the real page with a link to a scamming/hacking site, so that people would unknowingly give up their account information by logging in to a fake page. This page needs protection POSTHASTE. CorinthMaxwell (talk) 04:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just had to do the same exact thing. Crazed by Penguins (talk) 09:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: "Users can do things not allowed in real theaters, such as throw tomatoes, fireballs, and popcorn."
Is it really needed to point out that you are not allowed to throw tomatoes, fireballs and popcorns in a real theater? I don't know about you guys, but I just think it sounds really unprofessional. Why not just write: "User can throw tomatoes, fireballs, popcorn, as well as other things during the cinema session" or something along that line. I think most people get that you don't throw tomatoes and popcorns in a real cinema and I'd really enjoy watching a footage of someone throwing a "fireball" in a real cinema, hehe. 17:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't necessary. You should be bold and change it. And anything else that sounds unprofessional. Spriteless 17:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thanks! 18:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really necessary? 

message: Is it important to add about the new style that Gaia has added? I was thinking more on the lines of a one-liner that states that date of the new style.Silver seren 20:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New style? 

message: * http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/aug/09/guardianweeklytechnologysection.internet1
* http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070821/OPINION/708210333/1029
* http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/10/social-networking-games-tech-cx_rr_games06_1212social.html
* http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/09/opinion/edbeam.php
I don't really have time to work those in tonight, but they would resolve the cleanup template if mentioned and clearly cited in the article text. MrZaiustalk 09:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Available sources

message: I edited this out, if someone can give me a good reason it should've been in the article feel free:
"Particular members, known as 'prommies' have gained notoriety in these forum, these include but are not limited to the users Wyf, Sith Lord Ali, The White Beyonce, Serbian Girl,Full of Rabies II, Interpolly and Fifties Housewife."
203.98.31.34 03:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think it ought to stay out. This month's prommies may be forgotten next year, and I've always felt that the facts on wikipedia ought to stay true. Denna Haldane 14:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Because not everyone is familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. It's good that you do, but please try not to bite the newcomers. Though I agree; that shouldn't be in the article. – DroEsperanto(talk|contribs) 20:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: in case anyone objects

message: I've never heard of such person named Natasha being responsible for being "the founder of Gaia" or is this another one trying to make themselves look popular?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themurkyone (talk • contribs) 00:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: koijeibl?

message: Gaia has announced a Cash Shop in it's most recent announcement, and I think it should be mentioned with the monthly collectibles, at least when it's released.
Does it have a place in this article?
74.161.219.155 01:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaia Cash and La Victoirie 

message: :Image:Gaia Towns Inside a House2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gaia Towns Inside a House2.JPG

message: there have been to many banning's of the known exchanger like teh philosopher slow decay and teh superman im tired of all this
hackings there was a guy he said he had gotten hacked but when i cheked out his profile the last login date was an hour before he made the topic but he said he got hacked 2 days ago
scammingsmy friend chevy silverado 1500 was exchanging and he got an offer for his 450 letters the guy offered a devil tail wich was an even trade the dude was supposed to put the tail in the last trade but never did so now hes stuck with what he had on him
if you agree with me on this send me a pm on gaia my username is i is jeebus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.166.11 (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bannings scammings and hackings 

message: I believe there should be an entire section on Gaia's economy. The market section would be moved into this section, and the entire second paragraph (talking about the currency) could also be moved into the Economy section (both as subsections, of course). Crazed by Penguins (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Second Life was had a lot of fluff pieces written about its economy, because it deals with real money. Gaia hasn't. Nobody in the real world cares about Gaia's economy. It isn't notable, and Wikipedia is not a game guide: WP:NOT#GUIDE TheBilly (talk) 04:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lulz, okay: http://www.firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=17435 http://www.virtualworldsnews.com/2007/09/gaia-online-cre.html http://virtual-economy.org/blog/teen_world_gaia_online_appoint http://www.news.com/2100-1032_3-6208242.html   http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6208242.html 
There's five articles written on Gaiaonline's economy.  How many more would you like me to find before you consider gaia's economy "notable." Consider that some one in the "real world" cared enough about gaia's economy to bid 6000 dollars on an item on E-bay before Gaia and eBay worked out a way to make it difficult to sell gaian items on eBay. 67.185.242.59 (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy 

message: Earlier this month, after frequent attempts to vandalize the page by phishers, scammers, and hackers, I removed the link to the main page of Gaia from the External Links section. Today, I went through the revisions of the page, only to find that someone decided to not only restore that link (and subsequently replace it with that of another phishing site), but they also removed the link to Gaia's Terms of Service. The link to Gaia's main page was originally removed from that section by me in order to prevent anyone from misleading Gaia & Wikipedia users to false login pages, and because that very link also already exists at the top of the article. I am asking that anyone who wishes to edit this page not restore it again, because it is too much of a convincing target. CorinthMaxwell (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, though I removed the link to the Terms of Service, too.  It is not normal practice to have deep links on the article subject's website unless the link is of particular importance.  I don't think their Terms of Service is that important in the context of the article.  I have noticed that there has been a rash of phishing attempts and I've blocked the latest IP to attempt to insert a phishing address. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Repeatedly removing a link to the website that the article is about is completely inappropriate. Including the link both in the infobox and in the external links section is common practice. The proper way to handle phishing and vandalism is to simply revert such edits, report the vandals (at WP:AIV), and request permanent semi-protection of the article (at WP:RFP) if it's a frequent target of IP vandalism TheBilly (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to "Gaia Online" in External Links section 

message: :Image:Gaia Towns Inside a House.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gaia Towns Inside a House.jpg

message: I think that sentence needs to be clarified or taken out. I mean, it's to protect themselves legally that some of the quests are region-locked. 203.59.104.134 (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it isn't. The only solid information is that their advertisers asked them to, and they obeyed. All other interpretations are pulled out of thin air — TheBilly(Talk) 19:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quest Controversy 

message: http://wikichan.org/index.php/Gaiafag
I don't know of this belongs here, or if there's anything we can do about it, but just thought I'd let you know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warmish Water (talk • contribs) 00:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikichan subsection 

message: Where did all the company stuff go?  Derek Liu, Long Vo, Josh Gainsburough were all founders of the company. It seems everything about Gaia Interactive has been stripped.  If this was intentional, the Gaia Online page should be split into Gaia Online and Gaia Interactive, the former focusing on the site and the second on the company. 68.122.69.210 (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founders / Company Info 

message: should we put a link to http://gaia.wikia.com/wiki/Gaia_Online because its a  Wiki for Gaia Online. Akira-otomo (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  gaia pedia