Talk:Terrestrial Planet Finder

message: My honest opinion: This link goes to the section in my user's page.  I have written a long argument that I am still in the process of editting.  It was mainly a 'stream of consciousness.'  People who wish to submit their thoughts can do so in the discussion area of my user page.  Submit your thoughts if you are as outraged as I at the fact that NASA is putting science on the backburner.--Marsbound2024 03:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree, and will say so here, as well. This is so shameful. --James S. 07:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Let's put it this way, if I were worth $1.61 billion, I would give my money to NASA and live as a poor man, just for this mission.  This is the first time in my life I feel like my country has failed me. --John Ballentine 05:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Near-sighted Vision for Space Exploration

message: I'm too lazy to find out how the reference templating works now, but the quote "The Terrestrial Planet Finding project (TPF) has been deferred indefinitely" is to be found at on the NASA site at http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/142458main_FY07_budget_full.pdf at the bottom of page 80. Algebraist 19:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it. Thue | talk 17:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed tag 

message: I added an "external link" to a Planetary Society article dated November 2006, saying that NASA continues to argue against the Terrestrial Planet Finder and also the Europa project.  I didn't change the body of the article to reflect this news... could somebody do that?  
The situation seems to be constantly changing.
I too don't know how the reference templating work.
John Baez 17:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NASA continues to argue against TPF

message: there has been a lot of inapropriate citations on this article, including its schedule. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fbs. 13 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation problem 

message: why does the section "Top 100 targets for earthlike planets" lack gliese 581? I mean, it alredy has the first potentially habitable Super-earth discovered. Why dont you at least put it on the 7th star in that section.Fbs. 13 01:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[gliese 581c|wolf 562c]] 

message: Substituted at 07:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Terrestrial Planet Finder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://sco.stsci.edu/starvault/index.php?sort=rank
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070118234857/http://planetary.org/programs/projects/sos/20061122.html to http://planetary.org/programs/projects/sos/20061122.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070715214042/http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/TPF/TPFIswgReport2007.pdf to http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/TPF/TPFIswgReport2007.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified