Talk:Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R

message: The article reads less like an ad now, but still needs work. Lavenderbunny 16:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2007

message: Bikez.com was discussed by WikiProject Motorcycling back in January 2011. The content consists of copy-pastes of manufacturer press releleases, combined with user-generated content. See WP:USERGENERATED. Bikez.com says "Bikez.com holds no responsibilities for the correctness or authenticity of information, pictures and other material found at Bikez.com". It says they collect whatever people give them. They do not test motorcycles. They did not remove the engine from a ZX-12R and dyno test the horsepower at the front sprocket. On the other hand, Motorcycle Consumer News actually took a real bike and tested it with a dyno and a radar gun. One meets Wikipedia's criteria; the other does not. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  bikez.com 

message: http://www.dragbike.com/news/07-00/071200i.htm It claims the bike was not restricted, but gives no explanation as to why.
It isn't clear exactly what Dragbike.com is. It appears to contain a fan forums, and a lot of advertising. It has articles written by product vendors and enthusiasts. The article above is unsigned. Who wrote it? What is the explanation for the contradiction with every other published source? Is it some kind of grand international conspiracy to hide the truth? Why? Usually conspiracies have a reason.<P>Of course on the internet, conspiracy needs no reason. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is most likely a press release from the exhaust company. It fails WP:RS and I believe your actions to be correct.  --Biker Biker (talk) 11:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a thing on the internet 

message: The manufacturer's claim of 210 kg (460 lb) is so far out of the realm of possibility that I don't think we should mention it at all. Both Motorcycle Consumer News and Cycle World agree the wet weight is 247 kg (545 lb). Even if we are willing to believe the claimed wet weight is , this 210 kg dry weight sounds like a fantasy. The items removed for dry weight add up as follows:
   8.1   battery Yuasa YTX14H-BS
  33.1   5.3 US gallons fuel @ 6.25 lbs 
   7.9   3.8 US QT oil at 1.84 lbs
 =49.1 lbs total
So if you start with this dry weight...
  460.0 lbs
  +49.1 lbs
 =509.1 
That puts you 39.1 lbs short of the claimed wet weight, and 35.9 lbs less than the tested wet weight by two different sources. Where's all the extra weight? It's well known that manufacturers will fudge their numbers, and when they do we should ignore them, unless third party sources have drawn attention to these "errors" and lies. 
Is there any reason to believe 460 lbs is even close to the correct dry weight? Is there 40 pounds of oil in the forks? Did they weigh it with no tires? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that makes sense. Thanks! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dry weight of 210 kg 

message: It's strange that something as basic as unit conversion ordering has become a reason to fight. In the conventions of the Automobile Project WP:AUN and the Motorcycling Project WP:MCNUM the practice of placing the units of the bike's major market (which is almost always country of origin) is pretty uncontroversial. It's nothing more than a derivation of the WP:MOS convention WP:UNITS. I've never seen any evidence that the ZX-12R is a USA-only bike, or that the US is somehow a more significant market than Europe or Asia. Maybe the US sales numbers are a bit higher than other countries (maybe) but even then, are we going to make Triumphs and BSAs and Ducatis primarily inches and pounds because they sell more of them in the US? It just seems odd to have to even bicker of something so obvious. Pretty much Harley and Indian, plus some very old marques, use US customary units. Everything else is SI units. Is that a bone of contention? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit ordering  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.sportrider.com/bikes/146_performance_numbers/kawasaki.html/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sportrider.com/bikes/146_performance_numbers/kawasaki.html//
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R. As a prominent contributor to Suzuki Hayabusa#RfC about speed restriction beginning with 2000 or 2001 model year, you may want to be aware that a request for comments has been filed about it. The RFC can be found by the article's name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa#RfC about speed restriction beginning with 2000 or 2001 model year, in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions. -- Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC/discussion of article [[Suzuki Hayabusa#RfC about speed restriction beginning with 2000 or 2001 model year]]