lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leslie Lamport

message: I'm pretty sure that Dr Lamport would like his scientific achievements cited before his work on a package of text processing macros! David.Monniaux 21:13, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a source to substantiate that this applies here? —xyzzyn 20:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See http://www.jinfo.org/Computer_Scientists.html. Tsf (talk) 00:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Jewish businesspeople]]

message: The first paragraph states that he is best known for developing LaTeX, and there is a citation that basically confirms that he is the original developer of LaTeX.  However, is that really what he is "best" known for?  I first heard about him due to his work in distributed systems, and the rest of the article supports the claim that he is well known in that field.  I changed the article to reflect that.  Urlass 17:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Claim to Fame

message: News & media website 103.120.38.22 (talk) 12:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  business
Talk:Family Federation for World Peace and Unification

message: It would be nice to have a citation (if it's possible to get one) for this accurate information which was removed from the article:
*In the late 1980s, the Grand Mufti of Syria and a contingent of his followers traveled to New York for a six-week in-depth study of Moon's teaching, in an effort toward inter-faith exchange and understanding. Chung Hwan Kwak then decided to back out of the agreement, which would have sent a similar number of Unificationists to Syria to study Islam.
This fact was probably not recorded in any written form at the time. -Exucmember 06:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This item would be better in the UC article, or even in a new article Unification Church and Islam. Steve Dufour (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that this would seem to be out of character for a senior Muslim cleric, I would suggest that WP:V#Exceptional claims require exceptional sources would apply. HrafnTalkStalk 15:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is a citation possible for this?

message: I think that this article should be merged to Unification Church. Both are talking about the same institution, and the name "Unification Church" is much more well-known. Redddogg (talk) 13:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Hi is it worth including this into the article? 
https://twitter.com/AP_Images/status/968938936973365255?ref_src=twcamp%5Ecopy%7Ctwsrc%5Eandroid%7Ctwgr%5Ecopy%7Ctwcon%5E7090%7Ctwterm%5E3 
Fourdots2 (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  AR-15 ceremony
Talk:Beretta 950

message: Messwiss, we are encouraged to be bold, so I guess this is where I need to be. I edited your entry for Beretta 950 Jetfire because it desperately needed editing. You reverted saying (Don't touch. I am using a standard layout.). Before you can used a “standard layout” (?) you need adequate content, which your article demonstrably lacked. There were other deficiencies as well.
It was woefully repetitious.
*Beretta 950 Jetfire is the title
*The Beretta 950 Jetfire are the first words of the first paragraph
*The Beretta 950 Jetfire are the first words of the second paragraph
*The Beretta 950 Jetfire are the first words of the third paragraph
*The second par says The Beretta 950 Jetfire builds on a long line of.... pistols .... manufactured by Beretta. The 950 Jetfire is based on ....Beretta pistols. (Beretta three times in one par).
* The same par also repeats what had already been stated in the preceding par, that The Beretta....is.... manufactured by Baretta.
It is poorly written. One par contains four consecutive examples of ungrammatical writing, non sentences which look like they came direct from advertising blurb, namely:
*Simple and small, very easy to conceal. 
*Last resort pistol. 
*Inexpensive, very easy to maintain. 
*Well build. (You probably meant built which I changed it to, but which you changed back).
I am reverting to my (amended) version  which may not be the greatest article in history, but is more in keeping with the desired standard of Wikipedia. If you disagree, then I guess we should ask for someone to arbitrate. What do you think? Moriori 21:33, Apr 23, 2004 (UTC)
---
Please don't interfer, I am doing all these pages the same way as all the other Beretta pistol pages I did. This is just supposed to be a basic technical data sheet, with a link to a picture or a picture. In the case of Beretta pocket pistols, there simply is not much history... unlike for ie. Beretta 92. Thank you for your co-operation! Meswiss.
Whoever wrote this article does not have full command of writing in English.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.159.217.90 (talk) 09:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A submodel in .22 Short was known as the Minx. --Phil1988 (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be renamed to [[Beretta 950]]
Talk:Heads of State in 1941

message: I disagree with the renaming of this article.  I thinks Heads of State is a much more descriptive and intuitive term for who was in power in a given year.  Incumbent is a colloquiallism that relates only to elections, and not fully descriptive of the acting person
Taxman
:Re-merged the article with 1941 incumbents (messily)._R_ 23:44, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Mihailo Obrenović, Prince of Serbia

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks (contribs) 18:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mihailo Obrenović →  – The main reason motivating this proposed move is establishing a consistency in article titles that cover ruling Princes of Serbia. A few weeks ago, this page and Miloš Obrenović, Prince of Serbia were the only pages that did not conform to this format. The page for Miloš Obrenović was recently moved to the current format after a proposed move discussion and the resulting article name was one that the editors either explicitly agreed on, were willing to accept or addressed their opposing thoughts. One editor explicitly proposed addressing this page should the page for Miloš Obrenović be moved the way it was ultimately agreed upon. I'd like to note that ruling Princes of Monaco, an existing principality, follow this format in page titles. Killuminator (talk) 16:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Strong support per WP:SOVEREIGNS. Estar8806 (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 April 2023
Talk:FC Hansa Rostock

message: Thank you Ahoerstemeier for letting me change the name of the file to "FC Hansa Rostock" as is the offical name of the club. Although I must say I was kind of shocked when I had entered the entire sqad, etc. and suddenly all of it was gone....
Hansa Rostock´s new official anthem is "Hansa forever" since 2001
the songtext is  in german
: It is not. The official anthem is "Wir lieben dich total", however "Hansa Forever" has de facto been used as the anthem for quite a while now. Mainly because it is extremely popular among the supporters, not because it's been declared the official anthem, which is not the case. - Venomenon 12:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  By the way: The official name does include those dots, so I removed the page. Xantener (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the "Recent Seasons" section of this article because it gives undue weight to the club's modern history, contravening WP:RECENT. Note that football club articles that have reached featured article status (e.g. Arsenal F.C., IFK Göteborg) do not have these sections, as they would not pass the tests required to reach such a status. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 07:27, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have any of the German football club articles you mention reached WP:GA or WP:FA status? If not, they are not necessarily good examples to follow. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't an argument that could be used here. Splitting the information off into an article titled something like F.C. Hansa Rostock statistics would be acceptable, but would need to cover as much of the club's history as is feasible. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent seasons 

message: The redirect 2023–24 FC Hansa Rostock season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 FC Hansa Rostock season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Draft talk:Mormonism and authority

message: This article is a complete mess with weasel words, NPOV issues from both sides, and alot of unsubstantiated accusations followed up by unsubstantiated responses.  I will check back soon, and I am seriously considering nominating this article for deletion.(147.126.46.165 03:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely and totally agree, we already have way too many LDS-related articles (many of which are poorly written). This article could be summed up in about 5 or 6 lines in another article. gdavies 06:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mess

message: This is basically an essay.  I think this should be merged with criticism of mormonism or deleted (as Criticism of mormonism is basically a pov fork from Anti-Mormonism). gdavies 17:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Style issues

message: I have redirected this article based on the suggestions.  This appears to be a hate article directed against the LDS Church by Southern Baptists Christian Fundamentalists, who IMHO are 100 times worse than the LDS Church.  After all, what does it say about any religion uses a device of torture (Cross) for its symbol. Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 03:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've undone the redirect?--since there's simply no other WP article dealing with its topic (viz., authority and Mormonism: or, for that matter, the junction of Mormonism and politics, encyclopedic coverage of which I hope to move here as well. :^) Justmeherenow 13:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Talk:List of state leaders in 1816

message: Can anyone place Nduzwani? Google gave me zilch, at least by that spelling. I certainlt never heard of it. -R. fiend
Apparently it's "Ndzuwani" in the Comoros.  The first sultan listed should be Alawi bin Husain (1796-1816), not José Manuel Serrano (certainly a bizarre name for a sultan).  john 21:12, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nduzwani 

message: In the Asia section there is reference to Awa.  This term has several geographical meanings, seemingly none of which would be appropriate here.  Could a knowledgable person please disambiguate this term?  Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation request: "Awa"
Talk:Heterosexism

message: Written emotively/persuasively like a essay rather than an encyclopaedia article.
Presented as fact rather than as a concept in the context of LGBT studies/ideology.
Most source articles are unscientific and read like blog posts.
Contains obvious ill will towards heterosexuals and lacks any mention of criticism of the term "heterosexism".
Some content could be merged with or condensed into a section of "homophobia", "heteronormativity" or a similar page.
Many logical inconsistencies but they may be beyond the scope of this talk page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsense-patrol (talk • contribs) 17:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surely does not meet article standards 

message: Labelling a group as discriminatory shows bias. Discrimination is based on individual beliefs, not sexual orientation. Samtonin (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry what?
Talk:Military alliance

message: I question the meaningfulness of listing the anti-Iraq coalition as a military alliance on this page. It's no way comparable with the alliances listed for the 20th century, and the allied have very little at stake, with the exception of the US, of course, and very limited commitments, again with the exception of the US.
/Tuomas 00:15, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-led occupation of Iraq 

message: I don't think they can be called Military alliances, not all of the members are allied in a military way, if allied at all.
They're just organizations.
   Don't know about the League of Nations, but the U.N. should definetly be classed as military, because you have all the resoulutions, and almost all the nations in the U.N. contribute troops to peacekeeping missions.--Peidu 15:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  League of Nations and  the UN

message: isn't a military alliance,no agreement involving war were signed.--Ksyrie 16:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SCO is a military alliance "making joint efforts to maintain and ensure peace, security and stability in the region". Emilfaro (talk) 12:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shanghai Cooperation Organization
Talk:Zebra shark

message: A new paper has just been released regarding annually recurring parthenogenisis occurring at the Burj Al Arab aquarium in Dubai. Is available at Wiley Online and makes very interesing reading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.226.19 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

message: I think that this is the same as the Leopard shark - let me know if I'm off base... Mark Richards 00:48, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: "It is a very sleek and slender shark, about 11.5 ft long. (SNIP) Maximum known length is about 2.3 meters."
Well, that just can't be right.  A quick check on Google shows 3.5m (11.5 ft) as the accepted adult size, which is well over 2.3 meters.  I'm going to fix this. Fehrgo 06:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomy and appearance 

message: I changed this from "Relationship to humans" to "Relationship with humans" on the basis that the former gives the impression that there is some sort of evolutionary link between shark and human, as in "a chimpanzee's relationship to humans is found in its similar genetic make-up". There may well be such a shark–human relationship, for all I know, but it's not exactly what's being discussed in the paras below. This has now been reverted back to "Relationship to humans". I'm not going to go changing it back again; perhaps there is a third way? Ericoides (talk) 21:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll change it to "human interactions", which I've seen used by a shark book. -- Yzx (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, that's better, but I'm going to change this to "Interaction with humans", which I think is better still as it makes the shark – not humans – the subject of the phrase. Cheers, Ericoides (talk) 06:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree; "Interaction with humans" makes it sound like the shark is initiating the interacting, when really for the most part it's the other way around. -- Yzx (talk) 07:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, we'll agree to disagree... Ericoides (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hum, not sure there is anything wrong with the original relationship?? I get more google books hits on relationship 1219 than interaction 807, but neither word is really right?? --Stefan talk 09:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading "Relationship to humans"
Talk:Castle Rock State Park (California)

message: Steinbeck's Castle Rock is located in Corral de Tierra, Salinas, CA. See p. 15, Steinbeck Country: Exploring the Settings for the Stories by David A. Laws; footnotes on page 231 of Steinbeck's "The Long Valley"; and numerous other sources. I am deleting that reference from this page. Rednikki (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further review, it appears that a previous editor conflated Castle Rock in Corral de Tierra with Castle Rock in Santa Cruz. I have deleted all references to Castle Rock in Corral de Tierra (including info on the Markham Ranch development), as the two locales are over 50 miles apart. Rednikki (talk) 18:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Steinbeck's Castle Rock
Talk:Pat Tillman

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of Tillman's conviction and imprisonment for assault, when he was a juvenile? Manormadman (talk) 13:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

message: Who is Prof. Michael I. Niman and why is he quoted in this article? It would make sense for the article to explain why he has authority in this subject.
Mosquitoer2 (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prof Michael I. Niman 

message: The circumstances of Tillman's killing are disputed, with indications towards both manslaughter and accident. The current description of the cause of death as friendly fire gives (in my opinion) too strong an impression of the latter. I believe we ought to find a more neutral way to describe it. Konli17 (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on description of Tillman's killing 

message: Some things may be in dispute, but some shouldn't be.  
:What was his precise rank (E-4, E-5, or whatever) at his death?  What was his function in his unit, and how many soldiers if any were under his command?  Was he commanding Serial 1?  Was the incident in daylight or night? What were Tillman's wounds?  Were there other casualties during the incident?CountMacula (talk) 02:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some simple facts 

message: "According to AP analysis, three lower-level officers are expected to be punished, and Kauzlarich may be one of the three." And...? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 03:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results?
Talk:The Whirling Dervishes

message: I have cut the whole lot about how-to-whirl, both as it was badly written and as it was redundant (Sufi whirling. I have added a long section cut and pasted form the Jalal al-Din Muhammad Rumi article where it frankly did not belong (But here it did , so here it is) I have further removed promotional links and rearranged everything. Please tell me what you think. Refdoc 20:55, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edit 

message: Aren't the howling dervishes different from the whirling dervishes? I always thought the so-called "Howling Dervishes" were the Rufi'a order not the Mevlevi order, which, as far as I know does not do any kind of howling as part of their sema or any other of their activities. — ©    Alex756   03:04, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whirling v. Howling
Talk:Sweetheart

message: Look at the current article of Sweetheart. Can it be improved?? Please try to make sure that whenever there is a link to Sweetheart, please make sure it is generic (that is, means sweetheart of either sex.) 66.32.138.124 02:00, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: Any opinions about links that point to here??and nathan woodley had S.E.X with tikesa I feel somewhat sure that all links that ever will point here will be either of the 2 following kinds:
# Links that are meant to be for the company Sweetheart
# Links for simply sweethearts in general where gender is not specified, meaning that it cannot be dis-ambiguated.
Any comments?? 66.245.27.17 13:53, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wrote a message about merging boyfriend and girlfriend here. See Talk:Boyfriend for details on what it is . 66.245.98.79 18:50, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Now I put sweetheart on Vfd to prepare for the page move of girlfriend here. Any better way than deleting before preparing the page move?? 66.245.64.202 20:55, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For discussion of the proposed deletion of this page and the move/merge in general see Talk:Boyfriend and of course Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sweetheart. Andrewa 00:46, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to here
Talk:USS New Jersey (BB-62)

message: There is a debate over which term should be used, and since this article uses one of those terms please read and comment at --> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:USS_Iowa_(BB-61) 
A 10 fireplane (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-commission vs. 2nd commission 

message: See this discussion and Wikipedia:Featured article review/USS Missouri (BB-63)/archive1, where it has been suggested that a more detail description of ship characteristics would be helpful, as well as using some of the vast literature on the Iowa class to reduce the reliance on DANFS. Hopefully this one can avoid FAR. Hog Farm  Talk 15:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description and sourcing 

message: How far offshore was the New Jersey in Vietnam? 2603:8001:2A00:3ACC:3D85:5300:D992:F7D9 (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this in regard to a change you'd like to see made in the article? - wolf 19:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Can anyone expand on the multimillion dollar dry dock and refurbishing plans that are scheduled for this ship? 2600:1002:B024:BD38:793B:28AC:50BD:6717 (talk) 03:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dry Dock and Refurbishing
Talk:List of state leaders in 2004

message: This should really organized by country (i.e., lead each line with the name of the country). Yikes! And again, "incumbent" is generally an adjective.  One wonders... incumbent what?  Moncrief 02:42, Apr 24, 2004 (UTC)
----
Should Bremer (and Iraq) really be on this page?  Would they not make more sense on List of colonial governors in 2004, in the United States' section? -Rwv37 00:39, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)
: I believe the criteria we've been using for a country to be on the state leaders page is sovereignty, so Iraq under Bremer ought to be in colonial governors, yes. - Jonel 17:20, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wiki says this article at 564k is too long!
Should we spilt it?
Suggest something like this
*List of state leaders in 2004 - Africa
*List of state leaders in 2004 - Asia
*List of state leaders in 2004 - Europe
*List of state leaders in 2004 - Rest of World
The divisions in use are:
1 Africa
2 Asia
3 Australia and Oceania
4 Europe
5 Middle East
6 North America and the Caribbean
7 South America
Tabletop 11:42, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a list, not an article. -- User:Docu
No reason to split a list. john k 18:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article at 54k too long.
Talk:Social organization of cyberspace

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 24 to May 2 2004, consensus was to redirect and merge with social software.  Discussion:
From Cleanup: Social organization of cyberspace POV / original research
*This listing was moved from Cleanup by SimonP, but he currently has no opinion on whether it should be deleted.
*delete with extreme prejudice.  Lefty 15:09, 2004 Apr 24 (UTC)
*keep, and keep on Cleanup -- interesting topic, important part of sociology of cyberspace/computer-mediated communications studies, lots of material that could be included in those/used, but also some parts that really need cleanup. -- till we *) 17:24, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately on votes for deletion there is only a short period of time in which to make a decision about what should happen to the article in question, and in this case a merge with social software seemed to be the group decision within the time limit allowed.  If you disagree with this, you are welcome to alter it but please don't go against the consensus and reinstate the old article. -- Graham  :) | Talk 13:54, 3 May 2004 (UTC)