lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Café del Mar (song)

message: "...it is regarded as one of the best trance tracks ever produced..." didn't seem to be too verifiable so I replaced it with "its popularity is reflected in the countless remixes that have since been created." 
Maybe there are some statistics or ratings (besides the number of remixes) of the song that could be incorporated to show that it is "one of the best trance tracks" Dav2008 18:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening Paragraph
Talk:Five-octave vocal range

message: Mariah Carey DOES have a five-octave vocal range from E2-F7 at least! (If you want to count the G#7, then fine, but I usually don't). As for Christina Aguilera, she does have a four octave range, but some people mistakenly put it as 5 because she goes into the seventh octave.
Minnie Riperton had the 5-6 range.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.49.62 (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: Normally, as long as a person is able to sing (not hit) a certain octave and about, their range can be rounded to the NEAREST octave or be stated in it's exact existence. I, myself, am a whistle register singer and not because u have the ability to sing in the whistle register means that you have a full, although wide, vocal range. Yes, I can sing through to the seventh octave, but there is also a possibility that others who can sing in the seventh octave may well be able to also sing in the fourth octave but may skip the 5th or 6th and go right through to the 7th. What would be the range cast upon that singer?--Mikéylicious & Really, Really Hot!!! 19:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! Define this type of singer's position
Talk:Iris sibirica

message: I just added the info about Hardiness zones. It still needs work but the HZ articles may get merged soon, so I'll wait. If you can add useful content to this article please be WP:BOLD :)  Doc Tropics 18:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problems! - the pic is one that was already on Wikimedia Commons, there's a huge library of photos of all sorts of things there for the using (including several more of Iris sibirica, see the commons link at the bottom right of the page) - MPF 22:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardiness zones 
Talk:Dariush Forouhar

message: Hahaha this is just ridiculous. Please provide sources for saying that Dariush Forouhar was a founder of the party, exact book, exact quote. "follow links" is not a reliable source, I have a book here that claims otherwise. --K a s h  Talk | email 18:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "anti-Forouhar Azeri turk propaganda campaign" 

message: The description of Mohammad Mossadegh as "democratically elected Prime Minister" is not correct.  Firstly PM's are not elected, as such.  Secondly, Mossadegh had been democratically removed and effectively staged a coup to retain power.  When that failed he resorted to even more revolutionary act. The Shah was forced from Iran because he tried to protect the constitution.  Many commentaries over the years have distorted the popular recollrction of what happened, no doubt due to an anti-Shah and pro-Socialist bias. Rather than going into this discussion in this article, I suggest removing the reference to "democratically elected".124.197.15.138 (talk) 07:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh" 
Talk:Cafeteria Catholic

message: ==Article POV issues?==
I think it can be argued that some conservatives show just as much, if not more selectiveness about which moral teachings they will follow as do liberals.
JesseG 18:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me give you a perfect example.  US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who wears his Catholicism on his sleeve, said that any judge who does not believe in capital punishment should resign from the bench, even though John Paul II denounced it in Evangelium Vitae (see http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2022 for Scalia's remarks). Pat Buchanan, in support of Scalia, said "it is the Holy Father and the bishops who are outside the Catholic mainstream, and at odds with Scripture, tradition and natural law" -- see http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26388 ) Why aren't conservatives damning Buchanan for saying, in as many words, that the Pope and the bishops are wrong? Jhobson1 16:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Nivelle

message: Who is the Hamilton referred to in this article?  There have been very many people with that name, but I haven't yet found one who was a commander of Portuguese troops in the Peninsular Wars.  --Russ (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sir John Hamilton, 1st Baronet, of Woodbrook. StAnselm (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamilton 

message: Some time ago I discussed the field works involved in this battle on talk:Trench warfare. I am copying the quote here so that the information is available for the further development of this article. 
At the moment the article is terse on its description of the fortifications that were involved in this battle: "Arrayed in front of the course of the River Nivelle whose route was marked by a series of hills on which the French had built strong defensive positions or redoubts." Yet the fortifications were very substantial and are crucial for understanding the battle:
::*
::According to this source Wellington attacked with about 85,000 men and Marshal Soult had about 70,000. The front stretched from the sea to Ainhoa, Pyrénées-Atlantiques to the Atlantic which is a distance of about .
-- PBS (talk) 17:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Field works

message: The articles cites extensively only "The British" as the definition for the Allies. The army was composed of three countries, so using the term British is imprecise. These armies fought from Portugal to France as Allied nations. The sources are correct, but the words should be revised, and the Portuguese forces were official troops, not rebels. IF the editor was the one who changed the words (And not the original sources labeled it that way), that needs immediate improvement. In other articles the term Allies is used, this is the only one i saw that kind of situation.177.36.190.42 (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased POV on terms for designate the Allies
Talk:EL34

message: e34L is actually a higher power version.  I will check my references and try to strighten that up over the weekend..
:guess this is manufacturer-dependant ... the JJ specifications  contain the same numbers including the power ratings but except for the grid 1 voltage ... --Kavol 20:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Philips/Mullard scheme, putting the number between the first two letters (E34L, E88CC and so forth) indicates a "special quality" version. There's no hard rule what "special quality" exactly means, it may be a ruggedized version, have tighter tolerances, longer life or whatever. Now that valves are almost exclusively used in consumer equipment whose users tend to attribute a variety of magical properties to valves, it may be a mere marketing ploy. Rocknrollsuicide (talk) 03:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I didn't understand this comment either. At first glance it appears to be nonsense, but I guess guitar amp people may use these terms and concepts differently than mainstream valve audio people. I have added a citation request. --Ef80 (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

message: There's a link at the bottom to 6CA7 . . . which is just a redirect to this page. Shalom S. (talk) 16:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular link?
Talk:Raymond Devos

message: I have added material from his BBC obituary. I have also added it and his IMDb entry to the external links. There is also the AFP article on his death in French which I have left in place because his article will  probably be looked at by a large number of Francophones. Capitalistroadster 19:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I humbly propose the following changes.
* changed the first paragraph to include "french".
* changed the nationality section. Mention he's french, say that he was respectful of his belgian origin.
* cut one reference. I think one of each type is enough.
Please feel free to modify if you feel that's not quite the right way to say things. I also think it's important to keep that discussion to a minimum: the guy is one of the most recognized names in french-speaking humour and I think it would be a shame to have half the article discussing a not-so-important side-issue. Pascal.Tesson 12:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur quand même with the proposed solution. Thanks for your contribution to this article! --Edcolins 14:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed resolution
Talk:PNE Agrodome

message: I've added coordinates for this site. If someone more familiar with the grounds could confirm them it would be appreciated. RichMac (Talk) 17:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: WWE hosted a house show in the PNE Agrodome.  KingRaven (>$.$)> (talk) 11:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE House Show
Talk:Thomas Minton

message: We are bidden to discuss:
* Firstly, yes we should merge (I regret, when I wrote 'Minton', that the 'Thomas Minton' article had escaped me).  However, the nicely illustrated Thomas Minton article is just three lines long and I can't make it any longer.  Perhaps someone will. 
* Secondly, there is much more to Minton than Thomas Minton as my article suggests. Just as there is much more to Wedgwood than Josiah Wedgwood but not as you would notice from the Wedgwood article.
* Thirdly, I believe the whole Minton - Hollins - Minton story, at least for the time being, would be best told in a single article called quite simply 'Minton'.
Please discuss NoelWalley 19:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are free to bring up the article at AFD, but I don't think that it should be deleted.  I came across this article though the missing encyclopedic articles project which has an article about Thomas Minton, which means another encyclopedia has an article about him.  While existance in another encyclopedia is not sufficient for keeping an article it is still fairly good evidence that it should be kept.  --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 13:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no case for merger.  The Minton article is about a pottery manufacturing company with the name of Minton and with 200 years continuity of manufacturing world famous fine bone china on the same site. The Thomas Minton article is about the founder of that Company.  The name Thomas formed part of the company name for less than forty of those years. NoelWalley 19:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: There is a strong case for merging 'Minton' into something.  Maybe into 'Minton (pottery manufacturing)' but there is no excuse for the current 'Minton' to occupy the whole 'Minton' conceptual space to exclude the Mintons that are nothing to do with pottery.  'Minton' should at least be a disambiguation page. Maias 13:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Minton' ought not to be merged into anything, if it is renamed 'Mintons Ltd' as has now been sugested, then 'Thomas Minton' can be allowed to slumber in peace.NoelWalley 07:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. Does anyone else have any further comments? Maias 23:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge tag removed following no comment or objection. Maias 23:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Škocjan Caves

message: The following "creative writing" passage is simply not in an acceptable Wikipedia/encyclopedia format (and it sounds as if someone translated it directly from Slovenian):
"Standing near the disappearing river had to be frightening, also at the genesis of the Greek mythology. Geographically we know the mythological supreme hierarchy of the Greek gods, but do we also know its opposite? The mythological entrance into the underground - Pluto's Hades? That's the kind of questions that strike the present day visitor... and the answer is not far from here."
Any suggestions on how to rephrase this would be welcome!
WorldWide Update 19:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MoS Issue 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Tony Skinner

message: Based on reading Pat Mills' book "Be pure! Be Vigilant! Behave!: 2000AD & Judge Dredd: The Secret History" I think this Tony Skinner is the same one as the one who played guitar in Rockbitch, but I can't find anything else that explicitly confirms this (Mills says that Skinner was "a witch" and "a member of a successful and rather outrageous rock band" . Is that enough to make a connection or does anyone have another source? Thematthewmurray (talk) 02:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Piedmont Triad

message: I am requesting this merger because nobody I know uses the term "North Carolina Triad" anymore. It's always "Piedmont Triad" or just "Triad". Almost all the television stations, newspapers, businesses, and even the airport use "Piedmont Triad". So, I say stop the confusion and merge! --TinMan 19:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Merger

message: 

Just in case you wanted one... --TinMan 05:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: The term 'Piedmont Triad' is a PR one and, like 'North Carolina Triad' not used in normal conversation.  I don't know when the term was invented, but as late as the mid 80's television and radio stations, newspapers, businesses, etc. etc. merely used the term 'Triad'.  The airport was Greensboro/Winston-Salem/High Point Regional Airport and was called 'Regional' in daily conversation.  Looking at the article, they've also added a whole bunch of counties - back then it was just Forsyth and Guilford, sometimes Davidson. 
24.16.164.253 (talk) 05:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Usage

message: I updated the information on Business 40 in Greensboro, which no longer exists although some of the signs still do.  The original I-40, which was redesignated as "Business 40," following the opening of the Greensboro Western Urban Loop in February, 2008, is once again desginated as I-40, and GUL is now I-73.  Someone else will need to update the map, though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xrlq (talk • contribs) 14:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary Highways

message: The list of all the counties that compose the Piedmont Triad does vary from source to source, but for Wilkes County, are there enough verifiable sources to merit listing it as "sometimes included as part of the region"?
I am neutral to its inclusion or absence, as I view it as a fringe area, much like Montgomery County.  It has ties to the region and commuters, but it is not closely related like a core county (EG: Forsyth or Guilford).  I do think a consensus needs to be developed though due to its repeated addition and removal to the list.
–Sparkgap (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilkes County
Talk:Knightmare (1987 video game)

message: I've got the game but I've not played it much so someone else needs to fill in the story more. I have the manual, box and disks for the Amiga version so if anyone thinks there should be more information from any of those I can get it when it's suggested. Bill 19:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is pretty confusing. It's about two different computer games but with the same title. Can't this be split into TWO articles instead? (one for each game) // Kada 1 january 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.177.80.218 (talk) 07:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: I have now spun out The 1991 Knightmare to Knightmare (1991 video game). To be compliant with WP:Spinout and the GFDL, the edit history of this article must remain, but I don't see this as a problem as this page is unlikely be deleted. Bill (talk|contribs) 13:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split out
Talk:Klein Sexual Orientation Grid

message: ::: A Google Images search on "Klein grid" shows variants on a theme.  I'd like if someone qualified in the field could opine on which variant would be optimal for this entry (and in fact whether it could be achieved by a simply-HTML table (or Wikitable) —sburke@cpan.org (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This is only a initial entry (stub) it is hoped that those who have agreater understanding of this field will swiftly update this entry.  
Thank you CyntWorkStuff 19:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please expand 

message: this totally needs to be merged with the kinsey scale article. I'm to lazy to do it myself but would someone pleeeeeeeeeease take care of this. - Arch NME 23:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with merging them. Each should be a distinct article and (it seems appropriate) reference each other a with a paragraph overview of how one leads to the other and (see main article) redirect. Benjiboi 10:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I had made some changes to the article.  Then, after I read the changes I made, I relieze that I made a mistake and I can not remember off the top of my head the current scale numbers, but I do know that the scale numbers are wrong at this time. --Snoopy753 18:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry about the undo 

message: It suddenly dawned on me....  There is a missing factor in this article: Social preference, as the fifth factor.  In all the other websites, including the referenced one, bisexulity.org, the Klein grid has seven factors, not six as was listed here.  Seven factors are listed in his book also, The Bisexual Option, chapter 2.  QED.  So I inserted it, and cleaned up a few items also. — Becksguy 14:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing factor 

message: Does the Klein scale account for asexuality? From reading through the article it appears that there is only hetero/bi/homosexual ratings. Whether it does or does not include asexuality should be mentioned in the article, as it is a notable difference between the Klein and Kinsey scales 24.224.147.148 (talk) 00:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asexuality 

message: I had editted the last line: "The KSOG has also been used in studies of conversion therapy." to change 'used' to 'misused'. Reasoning was I had read the source cited, with itself stating disagreements and criticisms from the American Psychiatric Assiociation. Then went to check the conversation therapy article linked and read that it was considered a pseudoscience. From sources gathered, I had misconstrued the 'used' as being previously vandalized. Sorry, for this confusion. 109.153.16.161 (talk) 01:35, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific Methodology
Talk:Treat Williams

message: I've WP:BOLDly reduced the simply immense amount of text devoted to the aftermath of Williams' death by motorcycle accident. An entire section was devoted to the prosecution of the guy who ran into him, which is ridiculous. This was simply not proportional to his notability and it needed to be drastically cut back in my opinion. Coretheapple (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Motorcycle accident
Talk:Whiteleaf Public School

message: What is the policy of listing fictional institutions alongside real ones in various categories?  j-beda 19:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Nimoy

message: *The IMDB link does not go to Adam Nimoy.  Sorry, don't know how to rectify it.  Sir Rhosis 19:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix IMDB

message: Nimoy shows married to Terry Farrell in 2018, but divorced in 2022. But there’s no mention of a divorce in the text of his information. Further, on Terry Farrell‘s Wikipedia page, it says she married Nimoy, but there’s no mention of a divorce. Is the divorce information on Nimoy‘s page incorrect? Gsypolt1 (talk) 06:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Divorced 05/20/2022. Case Number: 20STFL12287, Nimoy, Theresa Farrell vs Nimoy, Adam, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, https://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/. Retrieved August 10, 2022. Daaz2 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Adam Nimoy and Terry Farrell divorce?
Talk:Hymenopus coronatus

message: Hello.  Should we add a detailed description on the images here?  Like if they are female or male and how old they are (The Orchid Mantids)?
Happy1892 (talk) 02:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, no need to ask. We also need more description (adult, nymphs, diet, ecology...) in the text, but for that refs are needed. Pictures of nymphs, prey being eaten etc wd also help. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, I will do that.Happy1892 (talk) 23:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific descriptions

message: I think more pictures would be good.        
Happy1892 (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More pictures

message: I removed this statement:
not supported by the quoted source. --Esculapio (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: — Assignment last updated by GrillinBubbles (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Invertebrate Zoology
Talk:The Boogeyman (short story)

message: Interesting note about the publisher: My copy of the the book was published by Signet in 1979, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71.
The ISBN # of my book is: 0-451-17011-3
Should I also update the cover image to my newer version?
Sniper120 (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Information 
Talk:Graveyard Shift (short story)

message: Could we maybe change the title of this to say "Graveyard Shift (story)", since the only difference between this and a real Graveyard shift is a capitol or lower case 'S'.
Kenji000 (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusing title 

message: This story may have been part of the inspiration for some recently-introduced Dungeons & Dragons monsters known as "rylkar." —Qit el-Remel (talk) 11:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of trivia... 

message: "There are large, armored rats; albino, weasel-like rats that can climb up walls or burrow through the ground; and bat-like rats that have evolved to pterosaurian sizes."
Where does this information come from? I just read the short story and there's literally no mention of "armored" rats, weasel-like rats, nor are there any albino rats. The flying rats were kind of big, but not pterosaurian. Is this some back-of-the-book blurb that's been copied over here from some old edition or magazine? 31.208.86.80 (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I’d be curious to know the source too. I’ve recently read the story, and that passage is not in the 1st U.S. edition hardback … nor is it anywhere on the dust jacket. Poetic Licenses should be revoked here! 75.106.32.81 (talk) 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Armored rats, etc"