lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pac-Man Plus

message: the killer list of video games link appears to be 404 68.194.16.14 13:33, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  404 

message: It is a common belief that Pac-Man Plus was an unautharised game along with Jr.Pac-Man and Baby Pac-Man, but that is'nt actually true, Pac-Man Plus WAS an official Namco licenced game. The marque on the arcade cabinet states licenced from Namco as do the flyers, Midway's Jr. and Baby do not. Also Namco has rereleased Pac-Man Plus several times, on Jakks TV Games and on mobile phones.
The article should be corrected so it has this information. Thank you.
90.194.128.134 (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 2022, I personally haven't found a source that backs this up. IIRC, it was covered in Kent's book as unauthorized, though Namco eventually did recognize it as part of the series. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional thought: The "Licensed from Namco" bit on the marquees for all of the Midway Pac-Man games is misleading. They could get away with putting that on the marquees because they held a license to the general Pac-Man property - the agreement between them and Namco was that Midway was the company to publish all Pac-Man (and generally all Namco) properties in the USA, and it wasn't strict enough to prevent Midway from making their own derivatives. However, Midway abused this by essentially claiming American ownership of the license and saying they had free reign to create new titles in the franchise, which Namco did NOT intend to give them permission to do. That's the reason Namco terminated the agreement. As for officiality, Namco is the actual owner of the Pac-Man franchise, so they get to dictate what is official and what isn't. Their decisions are arbitrary, and as such, they only chose to recognize Ms. Pac-Man as an official title - but even then, they've stopped doing that recently due to litigation with GCC (the AtGames dispute). — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This game IS official 
Talk:H1 (particle detector)

message: Comment: 
Minor edits for grammar and tense consistency as well as partial merger with H1 information from the DESY main article. The proposed changes are underlined. Redactrice at DESY (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Redactrice at DESY  Proposed edits implemented as requested (after review).  Cheers. Duke Gilmore (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: * H1 public homepage
* H1 public and collaboration homepage
* List of publications
* H1 experiment record on INSPIRE-HEP
:Category:Particle experiments
:Category:Buildings and structures in Altona, Hamburg
Redactrice at DESY (talk) 10:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Aurora toolset

message: I believe this document needs some serious overhauling. Several glaring inaccuracies exist within it as well as a lot of POV being contained which does not provide the reader with the information they require about the toolset itself and what it is capable of. Very little time is spent in detailing the components of the module and a lot of time is spent providing opinions about its use and flexibility (which depending on your ability to write code varies greatly).
I am trying to write an updated version for the up-coming Electron toolset which will be featured in the sequal, some of this could be retrofitted if someone wants to get stuck into it. Enigmatical 23:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul required 

message: Could someone take and upload a screenshot please? I would like to use it as an example of an RPG construction set.
Please reply on my Talk page. Thanks. SharkD  Talk  00:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot
Talk:United Pentecostal Church International

message: Despite its involvement in famous cult cases and the word even appearing in the headline of one of the cited articles, this article does not use the word "cult" anywhere in its text. Why is that?71.32.167.13 (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia strives for maintaining a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). If Wikipedia states that the UPCI is a cult, then that would be taking on a point of view. Ltwin (talk) 23:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

text: See also MOS:LABEL, which specifically discusses the use of "cult" to describe an organization. Ltwin (talk) 23:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cult
Talk:Opera (web browser)

message: For some reason the fact that it is owned by Chinese consortium, is unknown to most of the people who use it. 2A06:C701:4903:A200:FC72:201F:F603:C1F7 (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is important to mention who owns the browser 

message: The history ends at 2017 which is quite outdated. Browserkid (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. @Maida210 and I extended the history section up to the present-day updates, noting down the more major updates to the browser. We only focused on updates from and post 2017, so it's possible some gaps still need to be filled in from before 2017. OWiestling (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The updated infomation is needed 

message: Hi! I'm working with a partner to make some edits to the page. We plan on updating the outdated history section and possibly including a piece on previous controversy with the browser either in the Opera (web browser)#Reception section or making a dedicated section for it. Any suggestions, feedback, or concerns appreciated. Maida210 (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Published two edits, one to history changes and another to the GX section. Any feedback on the changes is welcome. Maida210 (talk) 04:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned updates and additions to page 

message: This should not be here, unless someone has any objections, or can explain why this is here, i will remove it in a week if there is silence. Zman714 (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is written in a way that excessively promotes all of the browser's features and it does read like an advertisement with all the features listed with descriptions of how they work. Additionally, this cites Opera's website itself very often. PunchboxNET (talk) 13:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: How would you suggest edditing this article so that it read less like an advertisement? it seems to me that the best source for what the Opera browser can do is it's own website. i'm open to suggestions, as I would like to make this article better because it was the reason i now use opera. Zman714 (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there's probably not a lot that can be done, I checked other pages about browsers and realised most pages contain similar-looking features sections. You're probably right that  doesn't belong. Not sure why it was added. PunchboxNET (talk) 19:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply for the record, you're good if i remove this (advert) from the article? Zman714 (talk) 02:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but maybe you should wait for a more experienced editor than me. (I have <100 edits) PunchboxNET (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, i'll probably just leave it then. Hopefully someone else will come along who has more experience. I'm pretty lacking in edits myself. Zman714 (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement content template does not belong
Talk:Chelsea F.C.

message: Change "Four other players made more than 500 appearances for the club: Peter Bonetti (729; 1959–79), John Terry (717; 1998–2017), Frank Lampard (648; 2001–2014) and John Hollins (592; 1963–1975 and 1983–1984)." to "Five other players made more than 500 appearances for the club: Peter Bonetti (729; 1959–79), John Terry (717; 1998–2017), Frank Lampard (648; 2001–2014), John Hollins (592; 1963–1975 and 1983–1984) and César Azpilicueta (508; 2012-2023). Zrandrew (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Bestagon ⬡ 19:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2023 

message: Premier league position “change 12 to 11” 92.238.232.203 (talk) 16:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The league position in the infobox is of 2022-23 season, it will be updated with the final position of 2023-24 season after it's conclusion. See 2023–24 Premier League for current positions. Thanks! CptViraj (talk) 17:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2023
Template talk:Gov-stub

message: Could a more neutral image than the US capitol building be used for government stubs?  A very large number of such stubs are completely non-US related...
:Why don't we use an image that is actually visible instead? I've gone ahead and been bold in adding the UN emblem instead. - Kookykman|(t)e 23:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the UN logo is not so neutral. Some governments see the current UN siding with the US and is "out to get them". Can we get a pic that says government without it being an organization logo or a landmark? Besides, isn't the use of united nations logo restricted? use of the emblem is restricted~ Feureau 13:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to Feureau's comments, the UN really isn't a government, it's an organisation composed of nations themselves.  I think US capitol is the most recognisable governmental building and would move for its reinstatement.  I would certainly prefer another icon but I can't think of one.  mjec 12:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: See  for US Gov't stub (which is what I was looking for when I found this one) — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 11:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Related templates

message: In your definition of the Pensions Ombudsman, you have listed the Deputy Pensions Ombudsman as Charlie Gordon. This is incorrect. The current Deputy Pensions Ombudsman is Jane Irvine.
NWinn14 (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. →Στc. 06:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 1 December 2011
Talk:Milo Manara

message: I've never done biblios much when editing here so I'm not sure about the protocol for editing this, but Manara did very popular & well received adaptations of both "Emmanuelle" & "The Story of O" and I don't see them mentioned here.
What's required to add them to his works list? SLEPhoto (talk) 03:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: just the publication data. Go ahead and add them. :)·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 13:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

text: I did not add this because I double checked & had another illustrator who produces similar work (Guido Crepax) confused with him. SLEPhoto (talk) 20:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story of O/Emmanuelle? 
Category talk:Airports in Macau

message: Instantnoodle asked me to have a look at your newly looming revert war. There is a fair amount of redundancy in the category links here. I think it is good practice to link one step up and one step down but not to have multiple links + multiple steps up and down. Another issue is the doubling up of two categories which appear to be identical in intention re worldwide airports. 
My suggestion is that this article links upwards only towards Airports of PRC , that any articles on the heliports link directly into the category of heliports + into this category, as heliports appears to be some special thingy. The Airporst of China category then links into oneonly of the two worldwide categories and you take the good opportunity to merge both worldwide ones into one. Make sure taht you take care of all links.
Have fun.... Refdoc 20:32, Mar 14, 2005 
:Mmm..I'm proposing to have :category:Airports of the People's Republic of China renamed :category:Airports of mainland China. Macau is a special administrative region. Civil aviation is part of its autonomy, and it concludes bilateral aviation agreements on its own right. Flights from Macau to airports in mainland China are international flights.
:Please also comment on Huaiwei's most recent edit with :category:Airports of Macau. Thanks. — Instantnood 20:49, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
I do not think this is really a new proposal, but rather a long ongoing battle between you two in which I do not want to be involved. I must say though the state is called People's Republic of China and therefore the former makes a bit more sense (to me)- also I think there had been a vote on the matter, so it woudl probably be sensible to simply stick to teh general consensus however much it grates. Anyway, the current state of multiple links upwards (and several steps at the same time) is unsatisfactory IMHO Refdoc 21:02, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Persian Empire (dynasty)

message: Whatever the choice for this name space, and the current one seems to be to redirect to Achaemenid Empire, there are consequences, not the least of which is that all those 1800 or so links mentioned need to be checked for correctness. I was led to this debate because the Kingdom of Kakheti (1465-1762 A.D.) was described as being a tributary to the Persian Empire (in this case the Safavids), by making Achaemenid Empire the default redirect oddities like this are bound to occur. The option with the minimum of work would, in my opinion, have been to redirect to the disambiguation page, however since this is unacceptable to some editors, the work must be done to insure that all links link to the correct Persian Empire, which ever that may be.KTo288 (talk) 10:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Consequences
Talk:King Edward VI Handsworth Grammar School for Boys

message: This article has survived a debate on votes for deletion. That debate is at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Handsworth Grammar School. Sjakkalle 09:38, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD 
Talk:Synanon

message: this article calls out to be rewritten and re-sourced, with all poorly or incorrectly sourced, or completely unsourced material removed. it also seems to be contain a lot of npov marginally notable information.
if anyone has actual sourced critique not from original research industry marketing and survivor testimony, this would make it a better article. thanks, happy editing! SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 02:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: any third hand information with dates and names, regarding cia thought experiments, is going to need sources other than tin ones.
SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)
¶ Someone with authority deleted my reference to a book, which I had added right after the mention of the exposé in the Point Reyes Light, but the book, The Light on Synanon: How a Country Weekly Exposed a Corporate Cult And Won the Pulitzer Prize (1980, 370 pages) is by Dave Mitchell and Cathy Mitchell, who ran the Point Reyes Light, did the investigation, and wrote this book detailing all the corruption and a good deal of behind-the-scenes dangers they encountered. ISBN 0872236137.  It is the best source for details about the Synanon scandal. Sussmanbern (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  article rewrite to strict wiki 

message: The article lead states that Synanon is still active in Germany and the info box says the same, but there is no further reference to the German branch or its activities in the rest of the article. Everything else says that Synanon dissolved in the 90s, with no mention at all of any currently active branch or activities. I don't think Germany is even mentioned as a place Synanon was ever active (seems to be entirely US-based according to the article) except for those two places. What is going on? Was it ever in Germany? Is it still? If not, why does the article state that it is? If so, why isn't there a section on current activity or any information about that branch? --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 17:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Synanon definitely still exists in Berlin: de:Stiftung_Synanon(Homepage, leaflet in English, Reddit thread). It was founded independently as a drug recovery self-help organization, then later associated itself with Synanon. Apparently in the late 1970s they distanced themselves from the US organization but kept the name. Synanon Berlin has been criticized as totalitarian and cult-like but doesn't seem to present as a religion. Their vans are often to be seen in Berlin, people hire them as movers and the like. --2.204.224.123 (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active in Germany?
Talk:Pana Wave

message: Why has this article been moved from :category:cults to :category:alleged cults? -Will Beback 02:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged cult 

message: This article is taken almost verbatim from 'Apocalypse postponed' in Fortean Times 173, August 2003. What has happened subsequently? The Pana Wave Laboratory website is no more - 2021 Wolstan Dixie (talk) 09:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article source
Talk:The Farm (British band)

message: He is not mentioned in the main article - so where have I got Ben Leach (born 2 May 1969, Liverpool) - The Farm keyboardist -  information from ??! Was he a later addition, or an early band member who left before things got serious ?
Derek R Bullamore 22:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He still plays for them.  Plays with the Scissor Sisters too, I think, and is at the radio 1 big weekend (no source sorry)--87.75.164.183 17:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Leach
Talk:Angular momentum coupling

message: * Angular momentum coupling - this article is a mess right now. Passw0rd 21:25, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. The article is totally confused on what spin-orbit coupling is. LS and jj couplings are not spin-orbit coupling - they are techniques for giving quantum numbers to multi electron systems. Spin-orbit coupling is a relativistic effect from the dirac equation. After my exams I might do something about this. LeBofSportif 09:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From PNA/Physics 

message: I think that the following sentence should be edited:
"One of its effects is to degenerate the energy level for the parallel and anti parallel cases, of the spin and the Angular momentum."
Instead of degenerate, I think "break the degeneracy" would be more appropiate, because without the orbital considerations the energies ofthe spin and  spin down states would be the same. The coupling therefore is what breaks the degeneracy.
:Hi anonymous! Welcome to Wikipedia - I noticed that you've made a few new articles already, such as internal conversion coefficient - they're really great stubs. Please feel free to make the changes to the articles (like this one) as you see fit - if you look at the page history, nobody has touched this page since almost 2 months ago. I'm glad there's someone interested in angular momentum coupling - these pages on Wikipedia can be greatly improved with your help. --HappyCamper 11:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording change to "break the degeneracy"?" 

message: The Rydberg series suggest the existence of atomic states which are referred to as "Rydberg states" or "Russell-Saunders states". Pauling uses Russell-Saunders state. Herzberg in his Lindau lecture mentions Rydberg states. These terms might differ somewhat semantically but I used Rydberg states which is probably older and more consistent with the use of "term symbol." --Jbergquist (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rydberg vs Russell-Saunders States 

message: Spin-Orbit is not the same as LS coupling. The problem with this page is that there is not a clear distinction between angular momentum coupling and spin-orbit coupling. LS coupling is a change of base that you have to perform in order to diagonalize your Hamiltonian H when angular momentum L and spin S are no longer conserved (do not commute with H). Spin-orbit is a relativistic effect that couples motion, potential and spin of particle, it is a specific term in the Hamiltonian. Now you may need to do LS coupling to obtain the (perturbative) eigenfunctions of your system when the spin-orbit term is added, but you could also need to do LS coupling if you add other electron-electron interactions. --MaoGo (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-orbit vs LS coupling 

message: Surely “moments” ? Or is this quanyum argot? Jabberwoch (talk) 01:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Momenta is the Latin neuter plural. The singular is momentum and the plural is momenta. Another example is quantum and quanta. Dirac66 (talk) 02:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Momenta
Talk:Posse Comitatus (organization)

message: I reverted the edit adding detail about the 2012 shooting incident for a number of reasons.  First, there's already a paragraph immediately above it - either expand on that or replace it, but don't simply add redundant information. The additional information was extremely detailed yet provided with no supporting sources.  The current sources in the preceding paragraph (one of which is a dead link) do not support the newly added information.  For example, the current source says the weapon was "an assault rifle," but the additional content says "AK-47."  Maybe it was, but you need a source to back that up - you can't just add details that are not verifiable by reliable sources.  Lastly, the current source only states that one of the people involved was "suspected" of having ties to Posse Comitatus. Unlike other incidents, such as Gordon Kahl's noted standoff, there isn't any solid information that indicates these were Posse. More evidence exists that they were Sovereign Citizen adherents, but that's not an automatic equivalency.  I'm not saying don't bring it back, but it's got to meld with the current paragraph (or replace it) and it has to be reliably sourced (and more info that these people were more than just "suspected" as Posse Comitatus).  If there's enough detail and it's notable, then it would be better to have its own article, which this could link to. Butlerblog (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 Shooting