Talk:Gas porosity

message: The article has problem with NPOV, but I disagree with presented reasons for deletion, If this information is a copy of published information, it can't be OR. Also, gas porosity is quite notable thing to have its own article. This article is about gas porosity and not about the Patent 5684299 solely. There fore I remove the deletion tag. Beagel 18:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't be serious. Of course it should be original for the patent, but when the patent is published and same information cited (well, copied is more correct in this case) in Wikipedia, it is NOT original research. Please see what WP:OR is. And this article is about gas porosity and NOT about the patent even if the information is copied from the patent description.Beagel 19:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only distinction between this and what WP:OR usually applies to is that this wasn't published first on Wikipedia.  Functionally, it makes no difference, as the only source is the original, primary source.  Someguy1221 21:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If not deleted, then renamed. Gas Porosity is a term that applies to the metals industry (bubbles if you like in cast metals).  This article (more like an advertisement for the cited patent) is about "Formation porosity evaluation" as it applies to "gas reservoirs" Softwarestorage (talk) 19:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: Propose to merge Formation Evaluation Neutron Porosity into this article. Beagel 18:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: While the Gas Porosity page uses a single patent as a reference, that does not mean there are not many other sources and far more that could be written on this topic. The majority of the material covered on this page could be found in any number of industry publications, with only the last few sentences being unique to this patent. Even the patented method is hardly unique. Nor is it necessarily correct.
Please, do not make the mistake of adding even more confusion to the Formation Evaluation pages by merging Formation Evaluation Neutron Porosity into this article. If anything, the material on this page should be merged into a broader discussion of porosity under Petrophysics. Neutron Porosity is vastly different from Gas Porosity. 
In the most general sense Porosity describes the void space within a solid matrix. It is independent of the fluid contained within the voids. Combined with a description of the measurement technology used, Porosity describes a measurement of the void space. For example, Neutron Porosity describes the measurement of porosity using a Neutron log. 
Gas Porosity is really a misnomer since gas does not contain porosity, nor is it a measurement of porosity. The method described in this page is one interpreter's preferred method to predict the actual, or Total Porosity within a matrix when the measured porosity (Density Porosity and Neutron Porosity,) include errors due to the presence of gas within the void spaces. These errors are called Gas effect. Kenneth Heslop (talk) 22:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to Merge Proposal

message: I've removed the NPOV template, please use  or better yet  for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - RoyBoy 16:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV removed 

message: Substituted at 21:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment