lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Attempted assassination of Theodore Roosevelt

message: This article fails to include the most amazing aspect of the assassination attempt. The Schrank bullet traveled through a thick manuscript and metal glasses case in Teddy Roosevelt's coat. The bullet was slowed substantially, but it still drew a significant amount of blood from Teddy. Instead of going to a hospital, Teddy insisted on giving the speech he was scheduled to give. During the speech, he opened his coat and exposed his blood-soaked shirt. No bullet was going to slow down Teddy Roosevelt.
The current version of the article doesn't say *anything* about the actual assassination attempt.  Joel K. 'Jay' Furr 21:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: One of the links from this page (Notes 1, http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/life/timeline.htm, The Timeline of Theodore Roosevelt) says that his name is John Nepomuk Schrank. The article says it's John Flammand Schrank. Exec. Tassadar  (comments, contribs) 13:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John N. Schrank or John F. Schrank
Talk:Smoke signal

message: Needs dates and history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan428 (talk • contribs) 
Needs sources too. 80.202.115.240 13:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs

message: The common image of smoke signals, in particular as used by North American indians, includes a kind of "modulation" where the message is conveyed by creating puffs of smoke (as everybody knows). This isn't even mentioned in the article, lest it's hidden in the "signaling system"-phrase. Hexmaster (talk) 15:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Messaging

message: The Polybius square uzed fire of torches, and no smoke.--Jean-François Clet (talk) 09:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Polybius square
Talk:Rollerball (2002 film)

message: I removed this pages link to the page that lists that worst movies ever because there is no reference to this movie anywhere on this page, thus rendering the link incorrect and pointless on this page. Raj O Mac 10:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed reference to page "worst movies ever" 

message: Rob Zombie song link was broken b/c the name was not complete. (The Red Red Kroovy)was added and the link is fixed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.254.16 (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Song Link 

message: Anyone wanting to expand the Production section might find this Movieline interview with John McTiernan useful. I'll probably come back and have a go at improving the article myself eventually, but not today. -- 109.79.69.228 (talk) 14:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Serving Sara

message: I have deleted the Production section for the following reasons:
*Nearly the whole section, as is, with no references, was added by an IP editor in March 2009.
*It cites no sources for the Production information. 
*It says that the two directors parted ways with the studio, but one of the directors, Hudlin, is listed as the film's eventual director. 
*It explains who was initially recruited to star in the film, but does not mention Matthew Perry, the eventual lead actor.
*It has a section about Frank Oz and Francis Ford Coppola that does not appear to be relevant to the film, unless there are sources that somehow make this story make sense.
*The content of the section is not relevant to the film itself, at least not relevant enough to justify including this mangled mess of sentences.
*The Matthew Perry rehab bit is interesting but not enough to justify a section by itself.
I won't be offended if someone reverts this edit, but do try to make this section make some sense and cite reliable sources if you do. I tried for a while, and I ended up with nothing. If someone wants to try to reconstruct this section based on reliable sources, here's what it looked like before I deleted it.
:Production
:In early 1996, Ivan Reitman was planning to produce, but not direct, a script he wrote, called "Road to Texas." In August 1997 director Ron Howard and Reginald Hudlin signed with Universal Pictures to direct the biopic with actor Jim Carrey in the lead. By May 1998 Howard and Hudlin parted ways with the studio citing creative differences. Other actors considered for Joe Tyler at time were John Goodman, Tim Allen and Dennis Quaid. In June 2000, the director sought to direct the biopic based on a script by Frank Oz while at the same time, director Francis Ford Coppola was developing Flipping the Mark which had been in development hell. Filming began in December 2000 from New York to Dallas with an early working title of Servicing Sara on June 23, 2001.
:
:During filming Mathew Perry had to stop and take time to go to rehab.
Jonesey95 (talk) 04:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted "Production" section 
Talk:The Singles Ward (film series)

message: The section has been tagged for several months. Please provide a citation; otherwise, it should be deleted or put on this talk page until a citation can be found. --Eustress (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, okay, my bad.  Go ahead and delete it, I guess. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 14:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your follow-up. The following unreferenced text was removed: "Some have said the scene where Jonathan comes home to find his wife drinking a beer and smoking a cigarette and announcing her disbelief in the LDS church was unrealistic and would never happen. Writer John E. Moyer actually had that experience happen to him which eventually lead to his divorce from his then wife." --Eustress (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration (Trivia)

message: To whoever's reading this, can you please place the actual plot in the article. This reads like something that was at the back of the box. Thanks in advance. Captain Superman (talk) 06:26, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Slackers (film)

message: "This movie also has a lot of masturbation scenes." There's two masturbation scenes I recall in this movie. One with Laura Prepon and kind of half of one where Jason Schwartzman prepares to masturbate with a hairdoll, but that hasn't exactly shown. So should it be taken out? ChesterG 23:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, how many masturbation scenes does a normal movie have? Zero? So this movie has one and a half scenes. That means that Slackers has infinity times as many masturbation scenes as the average building.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.249.8 (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a lot of masturbation 

message: The whole synopsis part seems to be taken verbatim with oh-so-minor changes from Rotten Tomatoes. --Ulkomaalainen (talk) 11:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright vio?
Talk:Monkeemobile

message: One of the three cars was sold at the Barrett-Jackson auction on January 19, 2008. I missed seeing how much it brought.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 06:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sold at Barrett-Jackson

message: I thought I read somewhere that Nesmith had a hand in the design. I can't find the source or else I would put it. But I remember coming across that info not too long ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.76.193.162 (talk) 13:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike Nesmith

message: Should it be noted that the Monkeemobile (no.2 I think) was used in the Sisters of mercy-video for "Black Planet" in 1985?79.136.72.15 (talk) 11:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The sisters of mercy

message: For an article about one of the most memorable cars of the sixties, why is the priimary image of a modern rendition (not correct for the show), and the second (of the cast) one that doesn't even show the car?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.186.12 (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We can only use images that are not protected by copyright on Wikipedia. Presumably if a suitable image is found that allows it to be used on Wikipedia it would be added.Echoedmyron (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't something be done about the images?
Talk:So Close (film)

message: there is, but it is apparently out of print (from yesasia.com) --Jamvaru (talk) 22:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there a soundtrack for this film?

message: Looks like the singer is Corrinne May. Corrinne’s cover version of the Burt Bacharach classic “Close to You” was featured prominently in the movie “So Close” released by Columbia-Tristar films. (from amazon.com)  no mention of there being a soundtrack. Jamvaru 20:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, it's Karen Mok. rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is the singer for the title song?  

message: Any comments on what needs to be cleaned up? Annie D (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up tag
Talk:Space Station 3D

message: Vtaylor12 (talk) 17:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Standing in the Shadows of Motown

message: Can someone clarify Alan Slutsky's level of involvement with the film?
I saw Alan Slutsky recently in Atlanta, where he spoke at the 2007 Swing and Soul dance exchange, Dec 7 thru 9, 2007.  From his discussion, it seemed like he was a primary influence in getting his book onto film, especially finding financial backing.  Foij00 (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stolen Summer

message: "The casting of Adi Stein as the lead character of the Catholic Pete O'Malley is considered an inside joke of the casting department, because he's actually Jewish like the boy he tries to convert to Catholicism in the film."
How can a little kid be religiously labelled like this? He's got Jewish parents, but he can hardly have made a conscious choice on his religious belief yet (when the movie was made). This must somehow be rewritten. (Of course, this is true for any religion and most kids, though I admit a prodigy might have come to a conclusion at a low age.) // Jens Persson (213.67.64.22 (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Religious labelling of a kid

message: Found a movie poster:  (Ekabhishek (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie poster
Talk:Sweet Home Alabama (film)

message: There is some subplot about lighting hitting sand and fusing glass artifacts of great beauty. I'd write this in but I don't understand it... anybody? Friendly Person (talk) 04:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lightning Glass
Talk:How Sacred Harp music is sung

message: This is a really great article - an excellent introduction. Thank you everyone! 165.124.106.253 (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Positive feedback

message: Hello, I'm moving this to the Talk page (it was inserted by a well-meaning anonymous editor):
:The process of raising the 6th degree of a natural minor scale can also be seen as changing the key of the scale. Were the notated melody in the key of C, for example, the sharpening of the 6th would mean that it is actualy being sung in the G Dorian mode. 
I think this is just not good music theory.  The key of a piece is determined by its tonic note, not its signature.  To use the anon's example, the Dorian mode on C is not a form of the key of G, it's still the key of C.  If it helps to see this point:  often at a Sacred Harp singing, half the people are raising the sixth and half of them are not.  But they're still all singing in the same key.  Opus33 (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Explaining revert

message: For reasons I've explained more fully at Talk:Sacred Harp#Internal Inconsistencies and Ongoing Issues%3A Origin of music%2C scope and organization of coverage, I've added a sidebar to this page.
There are some big issues about the overall organization of Wikipedia's coverage of this subject matter and how to organize it into various articles. I think it's really important for editors involved in this group of articles to discuss the subject and come to a consensus, because the current state of affairs can be very confusing in some respects. Various people have occasionally brought these problems up on various talk pages, but I'm hoping everyone might congregate at the talk section above and figure out some solutions to disentangling these interrelated topics and organizing them into a sensible group of articles.  
LiberalArtist (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sidebar + Please discuss organization
Talk:Tarzan & Jane

message: It says it was the pilot for the TV series, but actually is a compilation of three episode from the show. -- Beardo (talk) 05:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those episodes were aired last in the TV series.Pborri (talk) 20:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilot ?
Talk:The Third Wheel (film)

message: I just wanted to say that I felt it was very nice this page mentions the possible corruption of "fifth wheel."  I guess that's all.  Thanks!  71.194.163.223 (talk) 05:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Like This Page 

message: 68.188.203.251 (talk) 18:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  more to the movie?
Talk:Thunderpants

message: It's been 13 years. A more detailed plot is required.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.219.179 (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Trapped (2002 film)

message: To divulge that there is a "final plot twist" is hardly a "spoiler".  This isn't IMDB; I'd say to whomever added this much info on the film, please feel free to include the actual "plot twist" in the section marked "spoiler". Michael 05:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Plot twist]]

message: This film should be moved to Trapped (2002 film) as there is a 1949 film with the same name. --Nehrams2020 18:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Tuck Everlasting (2002 film)

message: I've just taken out an apparently complete transcript of this film. Sorry to whoever posted that--I'm sure you had the best of intentions. But Wikipedia just isn't the place for that sort of thing: even if its content were encyclopedic, it'd be alllllll kinds of copyrighted. Iralith 23:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcipt 

message: I was under the impression that it wasn't so much a re-make of the first film, as simply another film based on the same book. Similar to how Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film) was based on the book, not on the earlier movie Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory. I'm going to remove that sentence for now, but if anyone has a source that states explicitly that it was based on the older movie more than on the book, it can of course be re-added. --Icarus (Hi!) 20:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remake?

message: Members of the cast have been edited to show incorrect information; 
Xavier Montes did not play Jesse Tuck, Jonathan Jackson did, etc.
67.142.170.24 (talk) 07:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That was vandalism. I reverted it. Thanks for the post. Debresser (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors 

message: The man in yellow is wearing a yellow suit and at times also a yellow hat. Let's not change his entry in the "Cast" section any more and keep it at "The Man in the Yellow Suit". Debresser (talk) 08:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow 

message: The book does not specify the location of Treegap. The film was shot in Berlin, Maryland, see https://berlinmd.gov/about-our-town/. 20:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:XX/XY

message: A request to protect this article from regular vandalism by IP users was made today but was rejected. Trankuility (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: 197.149.220.239 (talk) 23:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Stickee (talk) 23:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2017
Talk:I Know You Got Soul (book)

message: The spoiler warning is a bit excessive isn't it? It is non-fiction after all, there's no plot to "spoil". Chrisd87 23:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Glenthompson, Victoria

message: you have spelt yuppeckiar wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.74.122 (talk • contribs) 
:ive fixed it. you could have done this yourself by clicking "edit this page" at the top --Astrokey44 10:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The first reference appears to be editable on WikiData, by virtue of the little pencil, but the link has nothing to do with the reference details so this should be removed. Keith D (talk) 17:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:The White Balloon

message: One of a number of Iranian films which uses little-girl actors, since Iranian film censors require adult women to wear head-scarfs on screen at all times (even in situations where Iranian women would not usually wear headscarfs in real life)... AnonMoos (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ƒ

message: I removed this:
: Font families that support languages using the African reference alphabet will have the minuscule f with a hook in its straigt form in the regular font.
Could someone make this clearer? The African reference alphabet contains both f and ƒ. EdC 23:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In case anyone watching this page is interested, there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics#ƒ or f about whether the symbol ƒ should be used for mathematical functions in Wikipedia articles. —Bkell (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Statistics discussion about usage of ƒ for mathematical functions
Talk:Jazz Fenton

message: In "The Ultimate Enemy" Jazz revealed to Danny that she knew his secret, but in the later episode "The Fenton Menace" her internal monologue suggests that she hasn't revealed it yet. Should there be something regarding this in the article? --69.183.102.110 23:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovering Ghosts 

message: above her picture it says (((character_name))). Shouldn't it say "Jazz Fenton". I tried to fix it but i dont know how.69.236.187.108 00:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mistake above her picture 

message: On Closed Captions it's Jasmine not Jazmine (that doesn't make sense) 70.253.163.252 (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name
Talk:Aleister Crowley (biography)

message: Space issues were discussed which resulted in moving this content. Here we can add more to this Bio without issues of space! Zos 23:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio moved from main page 

message: There is a suggestion to move this back to the Aleister Crowley page. Yet the user who suggested this gave no reason! There was good reason to make this its own article. What are the reasons for merging it back? Zos 01:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the one who made the merge page suggestion, but I'm going to support it anyway. It is not accepted format on Wikipedia to fork out the person's biography from their main article; the biography is supposed to be the purpose of the main article. If you want to fork stuff off for length, look at things like his bibliography, not the details of his life; those have to be in the main article. Bearcat 00:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The other page was not a main page for the biography, it was a section of that page. If the other page was specifically for his Bio it would have been called Aleister Crowley Bio, which it wasnt, and this is. Zos 00:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Biographical information on Wikipedia goes on the main article title; biographies are not forked off to separate subpages. This is not a negotiable part of Wikipedia format. Bearcat 01:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:naming conventions (people)#Several articles treating the same person (and the rest of that guideline). Indeed, Aleister Crowley (biography) would be an unallowable split. And, in view of Wikipedia:naming conventions (people)#Qualifier between brackets or parentheses, Aleister Crowley (biography) would be an unsuitable page name for an article on a person (I mean, even for disambiguation reasons). Diverting the biography of the person named Aleister Crowley to another article than Aleister Crowley would also be a unallowable POV split, per wikipedia:content forking. --Francis Schonken 07:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. Yet, I'm looking for a policy, not a guidline. A number of us actually have, on the Aleister Crowley talk page. Zos 07:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I added a few headings to ellaborate under. None of the info has any sources, but all was taken directly from the Aleister Crowley page as to not delete it. Some of the material needs to seriously be moved around to fit under headings. Zos 19:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting
Talk:Atlanta City Hall

message: Added it because this article is in need of expansion. Please reply if you have any objections to my edit. I also removed the unref tags under the wikiproject Atlanta, and the WikiProject Georgia (U.S.), because references were added. connor.carey 20:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Please expand this article" infobox

message: Radiojon, it's not generally a good idea to make links to nonexistent articles, or to pages that bear no useful relationship to the topic at hand.  So I reverted a few of those.  And please edit the Altanta Campaign and March to the Sea articles if you think the former was part of the latter.  After that settles out, you can make your change here again about that if you had it right. Dicklyon 23:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:Children of Heaven

message: 59.177.73.244 (talk) 15:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

message: I entered the following in the article and it is fully verifiable. Why was it termed as vandalism??
" This film story has been stolen and has been completely used by 'Only Kidding Films and Entertainment pvt ltd.' of India who produced a film 'Salaam bacche' in 2007 with exactly the same story without even mentioning a reference to this film. "--83.153.88.238 (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. Did you reference that line?--Abie the Fish Peddler (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism 

message: After reading the preview of Bumm Bumm Bole i was confirmed that it is a rip off of Children of heaven. I'm adding the section and putting the source where I read the preview. --Proteasfanz (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bumm Bumm Bole, hindi movie