lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Royal Australian Air Force installations

message: Shouldn't this be RAAF Amberley, RAAF Edinburgh etc?? kudz75 02:20, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I adopted the format directly from List of Australian airports. I would go by what the RAAF uses officially. At least one official site uses the RAAF Base Amberley format.  --Randwicked 06:04, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite correct, even the RAAF website  now uses "RAAF Base <name>" in the USAF style rather than the RAF style that they used to use. kudz75 01:16, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: RAAF Base Amberley

message: According to [a page maintained by Peter Dunn], there were quite a lot more airfields in use during WWII, which were quickly disbanded at the end of the war.  I have added one in Tasmania (Valleyfield, site of the former Skyrace Tasmania event that was run by Launceston Country Club Casino in the 1990s) which I can confirm, and I have refined the information about the Nile airfield. based upon Peter Dunn's research and my own close observation in Google Maps/ Google Earth, Nile airfield was probably at the site of a private field which is visible close to this location.  Also as a disused field is visible in a paddock about 600m SW of the existing strip. In any case, this field is likely to be close to the town of Nile, not Launceston, so I made the correcting in this article for it's entry in the list.
I cannot confirm the other airfields in Dunn's list, though I suspect they are accurate. The list may be useful in completing the list for other states, but I have no local knowledge and have not researched them. Sinewalker 04:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional RAAF airfields for this article 

message: I propose to change this page to 'List of Royal Australian Air Force installations'. This is the proper name for the air force. Ozdaren (talk) 12:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll wait until early next week. If I don't hear from other editors I'll make the move then.Ozdaren (talk) 09:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, page has been moved.Ozdaren (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Royal Australian Air Force installations 
Talk:Selfishness

message: I deleted it again after checking both sources; took me a bit to get ahold of the Palgrave. Result: altruism is defined, somewhat differently, in the SEP entry. Neither the classification nor the individual definitions are contained in either source. These sources do not support the statements in the article, as they have to per WP:BURDEN. Since we're concerned with selfishness here, the entire section is inappropriate. If you can find a reliable source supporting the definition of selfishness, please cite it. It is possible that I have overlooked something in the lengthy Palgrave entry, I do not have web access. In that case, please provide a page number/subsection heading and a quotation of the relevant passage, see WP:BURDEN. Paradoctor (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game theory section 

message: Content in this article is limited, and the two concepts are very similar. Farang Rak Tham (talk) 15:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Egoism]] 

message: The phrase "With the emergence of a commercial society, Bernard Mandevile proposed etc" is undefined. By implication it seems to be the British or Dutch society, and perhaps during the lifetime of Mandeville (1670-1733), but perhaps not. Could someone clarify please, or even better provide a Wikipedia link to a "commercial society"? 2A00:23C6:549D:C301:5D9E:1F2E:F4E9:BCFC (talk) 08:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear term "commercial society" 

message: — Assignment last updated by 20carnesa (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BISC 2 Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution

message: In ecology, species sometimes would cooperate each other, which would considers as a mutualistic behavior. But species choose to have mutualistic behaviors, because the mutualistic behaviors could provide them more benefits to fit in the environment, which ultimately is a selfishness behavior. For example, animal cooperation exists in wild dogs community. They hunt together, for hunt large mammals easier. During the hunting, each individuals would have specific roles, like chase the prey toward a cliff and make other individuals easy to hunt. Tmx5027 (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perspective in ecology
Talk:Pavlik Morozov

message: What is the image used for Pavlik? A propaganda picture, or "The one surviving photograph of him shows a malnourished child,"? This should be given in the image text too. Ingolfson (talk) 08:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: >In 1932, at the age of 13, Morozov reported his father to the political police (GPU). Supposedly, Morozov's father, Trofim, the chairman of the Gerasimovka Village Soviet, had been "forging documents and selling them to the bandits and enemies of the Soviet State" (as the sentence read). Trofim Morozov was sentenced to 10 years in a labour camp and later executed.[1] However, Pavlik's family did not take kindly to his activities; on 3 September of that year, his uncle, grandfather, grandmother and a cousin murdered him, along with his younger brother. All of them except the uncle were rounded up by the GPU and sentenced to "the highest measure of social defense" – execution by a firing squad.
there are multiple possible mistakes about this piece, firstly the father of pavlik was sentenced to 10 years and there are some data he was released in three years, i have never heard he was executed, then the uncle and the cousin who did the murder were executed but the grandfather and the grandmother died in the prison, they were like 80 y.o. or so. it is very questionable if pavlik took any significant part in reporting his father's illegal activities (which actually took place btw, he indeed forged some papers) etc, this article is very sketchy at best 93.88.216.35 (talk) 05:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is very sketchy
Talk:Acclimation

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion June 22 to July 1 2004, consensus was not reached.  Discussion:
* It's seems to be a perfectly good topic but it's an orphan and a dead-end and the current "article" is little more than a definition.  This is my first candidate for deletion and if this is the wrong place (or thing to do) I appologize to all. Kevin Rector 03:07, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Gudrun Schyman

message: I object to Schyman and the reformed Vänsterpartiet being referred to as "populist". I also consider calling the KFML "secterist" without further elaboration to be POV. I welcome the opinions of others on this.
David Remahl 03:08, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe the category should have a short intro explaining that it includes both current and former Left Party politicians (I will write one). In fact, maybe all the categories should (e.g. Maria Carlshamre was in :Category:Swedish Liberal Party politicians until I moved her to Minor parties). Do all these categories include people who switched party? Tamino 11:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Swedish Left Party politicians]] 

message: Is schyman a jewish name? or local? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.138.1.15 (talk • contribs) 
:No, Schyman is not Jewish. /Slarre 14:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is she Jewish? 

message: Nothing is mentioned about Schyman's personal background. Was she raised in a feminist family? Who are her parents? Which professional training has she had before becoming a politician? What are her vocational qualifications?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:4904:DFED:5D9B:3F1F:6263:66C0 (talk) 09:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: "She left the party in 2022"
This appears to be untrue, per the Fi website as of today. Harfarhs (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left Fi?
Talk:Tuning

message: Shouldn't this content be merged into Musical tuning, and then have this become a disambiguation page? The two articles right now discuss different topics, but both are "musical tuning", and the separation is rather confusing. Some rewriting would need to be done to accomplish a merge properly. Does anyone think this is a good idea, or should we prefer to keep these pages separate? Rainwarrior 03:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. However, the intention was to have tuning be about the act of tuning (such as tuning the strings of a cello), with musical tuning being about systems of tuning (such as just intonation). Both are music and they are different but closely related topics. Hyacinth 09:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Good one Rainwarrior, the merge draft looks excellent. Andeggs 10:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done the merge. I updated my draft to reflect the more recent changes to both pages as well. I've changed Tuning into a redirect to musical tuning, which is where its information has gone. Rainwarrior 22:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

text: This is a very bad idea. These are two different concepts, and cause problems with the interwiki's. I propose to undo the merger. — Zanaq (?) 18:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Musical tuning]], disambiguate?
Talk:Rick Dees

message: Since there is no citation of any facts, i edited the "forced out due to corporate politics" part. If anyone can prove it, they can change it back. 
--L.A.F. 06:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: Can anyone make detailed info about Rick Dees' Weekly Top 40 (not the DJ, the show) on Wikipedia, please?
:I already created that article for no problem. ChrisTaylorNYC (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article on Dees' Top 40 

message: According to the article, he was fired from WHBQ for talking about the song "Disco Duck," and then went on to be hired by another radio station in Memphis, whose call letters are also given as WHBQ. Which is correct? Shsilver (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  From WHBQ to WHBQ?? 

message: This article reads as if it were written by publicity agents for Rick Dees.  Needs to be less of an advertisement.
Randi75 (talk) 12:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely needs a re-write, although waiting a week or so until he's off the air at KMVN (It's going Spanish on April 15, 2009, and Dees will be on the beach riding out his contract until September) might make it easier to rewrite all at once. - Dravecky (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Overall Tone is Promotional
Talk:Cromwell, New Zealand

message: I used the word "between" for the highways in the previous revision because they do not in fact join, but are separated by Deadmans point bridge and the 3km of SH 8B just north of the town.
dramatic 05:14, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My flight to Dunedin happened to be passing over Cromwell last week on a day of exceptional clarity, so I snapped a photograph of this interesting town. --Surgeonsmate 05:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial photograph 

message: It made sense to move this image to the Bannockburn, New Zealand article as it is more relevant there.
--Grapeman4 (talk) 10:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panorama photo of Bannockburn moved
Talk:Nicollet Mall

message: If this article is going to focus only on the portion of Nicollet Avenue that is downtown, I think this article should be listed under Nicollet Mall. There are signs all around downtown and throughout Minneapolis tourism literature that refers to it as Nicollet Mall. Nicollet Avenue is broad enough to cover all sorts of things other than just the downtown area of Minneapolis, including Eat Street, the Tangle Town neighborhood, it's use a through street in Minneapolis' southern suburbs, etc. --AsianAstronaut 05:51, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ferrari 360

message: Shouldn't links to Ferrari 360 Modena, Ferrari 360 Spider and Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale be removed as they are in this article.  If any other links point towards those the should be redirected to just Ferrari 360.  Also does anybody have any pictures of the 360 as it is needed
Mark alec 06:04, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't links

message: ...do we need 7 pictures for one car? Can't we just have front/rear views of a few variations of the 360?
Considering that the 360 was built in Modena, Spider, CS, and GT-C variants (excluding the Challenge version), front/rear views of the few variants would comprise 8 pictures.  So... your point is?  P924 CarreraGTS (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why....

message: I'm kind of interested to know what Ferrari was doing here.... they put in an "F" for the F355, F40, F50, F60 (Enzo), and F430.  So why isn't 360 "F360"?  Is this article inappropriately named, or was the car line inconsistently named? Chaparral2J (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It went 308, 328, 348, F355, 360, F430.  So perhaps the F355 and F430 were the inconsistently named ones?  The F40 and F50 were not in the same line of cars so I don't think they are relevant.  I wouldn't call the Enzo an F60, as it was 4 years prior to the 60th anniversary of Ferrari. swaq 16:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, what is it with Ferrari and names?  They've come out with a new model of the F430 that they call the 430 Scuderia, NOT the F430 Scuderia. Chaparral2J (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: 360 modena's engine: eliminate 5-valve
F355's engine: using 5-valve
Nagara373 (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  360 Modena vs. F355 

message: * Agree The 360GT article is very brief (and needs citations!), just merge it into a separate section here. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 11:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:PCI Express

message: PCI Express Mini Card Pin layout should be included. And, PCI Express Mini voltages are stated 1,5 and 3,3 V, whereas the msata variation is specified 5 V. Could somebody resolve this? 87.185.213.192 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  PCI Express Mini -Pin layout, and voltages 

message: in slot power 129.130.18.193 (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken citation 

message: The 'cabling' section stops at OCuLink-2; it looks like PCI-SIG put out standards in early 2024 for PCIe 5.0 (and 6.0) cabling: https://www.anandtech.com/show/21379/pcisig-completes-copprlink-cabling-standard-pcie-50-60-get-wired. This round is called 'CopprLink', not 'OCuLink' -- no more allusion to a dream of eventually including optical cabling. 135.180.194.206 (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabling
Talk:William in Trouble (short story collection)

message: Hello!
In a sense you have not put enough!  Every day I go through the list of new articles and look for articles on books.  When it is missing, I add some essential information for finding the book in a library and/or a bookstore and/or a digital archive.  Usually I put in the place of publication, the most recent publisher and the most recent at least one of the editions of a book, when it has many, and more if it is imortant.  I also put in one/the ISBN for those who want or have to buy the book.  And after that I put an entry for the book in List of books by title.  I have rarely had so much trouble in finding an ISBN for a book as in the case for William In Trouble!  It has several editions by several publishers around the globe but no ISBN is availabe from the Web!! Yet it seems like an important classic in children,s lit!!! Maybe I am too tired.  Time to go to bed!  AlainV 07:26, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pencil lead

message: Pencils are called lead pencils due to the fact that in the roman times they used lead to write and draw with but it was poisonouse so then over the years they changed the pencil lead into graphite and clay.so then it was not poisonouse and harmfull to people.
:But there's no way that's true. This article and the talk:lead discussion seem to disagree anyway..
----
I hope that someone can put in a scale of hardness. I don't like the text description but I am in a hurry. :-)
I've heard that when graphite was discovered (under a tree?) people most likely mistook it for lead due to the color. this is rather ridiculous but it's at least notable as a misconception.. if indeed.. it has any.. uhh..
So on another note, the description of mechanical pencils isn't fully accurate, since many are front-loading (even if none are designed that way)
:Lead was the normal drawing material until Conté invented the graphite pencil; a lead was the name of the lead cylinder within its holder and therefore became the name of the graphite cylinder within the wood.--MWAK 18:38, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This page is largely a duplication of information at Pencil, except that the Pencil actually goes into considerably more detail... merge-fodder?  81.86.133.45 21:26, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'll put the tags on. Thryduulf 15:10, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is we need a separate article on the use of lead "leads" as the dominant drawing material until the late 18th century. So the two articles shouldn't be merged: this article should have its proper content!--MWAK 09:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: But is that assumption correct? I've always assumed that, Hardmuth being German, H meant Härte, B stood for Blei and F for fein.--MWAK 08:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication
Talk:Ridge-push theory

message: The title of this article is ridge push, yet the article talks about ridge pull.  Typo?  I can't find ridge pull on the web, nor can I find any pages talking about ridge push with the word "DeSouza" on them.  Crackpot theory with no credence?  --Jkeiser 08:38, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, just a poorly written article. Gwimpey 18:38, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center

message: The See Also list would work better as a separate section and not part of Monetary Cost.Laundrypowder 18:07, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break out See Also 

message: Can someone help marry up the long list of sources with the body of the article to knock it into encyclopedic form please.  Escaper7 10:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: the first line reads "The area surrounding the World Trade Center became the site of the greatest number of casualties and missing..."
compared to what?
I changed it to "The area surrounding the World Trade Center became the site of the greatest number of casualties and missing, due to a single incident, in the history of the United States" Is that better? 
The WTC casualties outnumber the Pearl Harbor attack casualties - see Attack on Pearl Harbor Roger (talk) 07:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite suggestions

message: There's a lot in the article about the emergency service's communication systems failing but absolutely no mention of the hundreds of volunteer Amateur Radio operators who stepped in and provided a system that worked very well. 
Someone with better writing skills than me please add to this article. 
Here are 2 very good sources - http://hometown.aol.com/realhamradio/ this is a first person account of the ham who controlled the communications at "ground zero" and this http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/WTC.pdf is an article published by the American Radio Relay League. Roger 09:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Communications
Talk:Johan Vonlanthen

message: What's the correct spelling of his name? Johann Vonlanthen is the spelling I've seen in newspapers etc and I created an article with that name. I then discovered the Johan Vonlanthen article and I see that's the spelling on the official Euro 2004 and PSV sites. I see the UEFA site has profiles for players  with and without the second N. I've copied the text from this article since it was more detailed than mine. If anyone knows the correct spelling maybe one page should be set up to redirect to the other. --Andy Smith
I just took a look at the official site of the Swiss national football federation (www.football.ch). Though I don't really know any of the languages (it's in German, French, and Italian), I do know a few words of German, and I found a match report from Euro 2004 with Vonlanthen's name in it. They spell his first name "Johan". That makes three authoritative sites that use this spelling, including one from his own country. Dale Arnett 19:21, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Which is the correct spelling?

message: Roger Vonlanthen is a Swiss internationals. He is the stepfather? Matthew_hk tc 15:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roger Vonlanthen
Talk:Cotangent space

message: :: "Given a function f ∈ Ip (a smooth function vanishing at p) we can form the linear functional dfp as above."
Why is it necessary to restrict to functions that vanish at p? Doesn't dfp exist if f(p) isn't 0?
:It does - the reference is to the definition of Ip. By the way, I don't really agree with the way this page does things - I'd prefer to say everything with jets (also). Unfortunately someone still needs to write about jet bundle, so I'll have to be patient. Charles Matthews 10:13, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: vanishing

message: The article on Tangent space gives the following 'informal description':  one can attach to every point p of a differentiable manifold a tangent space, a real vector space which intuitively contains the possible "directions" in which one can pass through p and then uses the description to give an intuitive motivation for the definition as directions of curves. Is there a similar intuition/visualisation behind the definition of the Cotangent space using smooth functions? AdamSmithee 10:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intuition

message: In the section The differential of a function, what does f o y mean? Maybe it is obvious to someone in the field, but it was not obvious to me. --agr 10:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what you notate as "y" is supposed to be a "gamma." It would appear the "o" is a substitute for the small circle that denotes function composition, so f o γ takes t to f(γ(t)). — vivacissamamente 14:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation  

message: Are the two the same thing? If so, the article should make it clear. -- Taku (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  tangent covectors vs cotangent vectors
Talk:West Germany

message: I thought that they were always enemies Usydydjwhxyxhx (talk) 07:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: NO: Entspannungspolitik, friedliche Koexistenz etc.Nillurcheier (talk) 09:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Please note that Wikipedia talk pages are not forums for general discussion about the topic. Yue🌙 23:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did west Germany repair ties with east Germany
Talk:List of air forces

message: NEHSA bi (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISSING 
Talk:Astronaut wings

message: The article seems to imply that the US Air Force is issuing these thing to every astronaut, presumably including Russians, Europeans and Chinese. I would have thought they'd limit it to their own employees? Horatio 11:49, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can somebody confirm that astronauts themselves are not legible for astronaut wings, and maybe explain why this is so? I'm confused because the definition on the page now implies that all astronauts should get astronaut wings too. Aliekens
— Preceding undated comment added 05:41, 30 June 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astronauts themselves? 

message: This currently redirects to the US government badges, but that is no longer the case, now that Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin have minted their own in-house wings. This needs to be returned into being a separate article, that covers the variants of space wings. One would be a link for the US government badges, other badges for cosmonauts etc should also be covered.
-- 64.229.90.53 (talk) 05:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "astronaut wings"