Talk:Drew Pearson (journalist)

message: :Image:Drewpear.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Drewpear.jpg

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: I removed the section named "Integrity of Warren Commission Investigation of Lee Harvey Oswald". It appears as though who ever built this section used primary and fringe sources to synthesize the conclusion that Albert Jenner's selection as one of the assistant counsel members of the Warren Commission was improper. This article is about Drew Pearson and Pearson appears never to have made that particular allegation. - Location (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Integrity of Warren Commission Investigation of Lee Harvey Oswald

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Drew Pearson (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100617191541/http://www.princeton.edu/~mudd/finding_aids/willcutts/ to http://www.princeton.edu/~mudd/finding_aids/willcutts/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have hidden the following paragraph from the "Criticism" section, because it appears to imply a Wikipedian's criticism of Pearson's views, based solely on primary sources, a form of original research.
:Pearson referred to homosexuality as a "disease". As late as 1967, Pearson was still using allegations of homosexuality to impugn the reputation of then-Governor Ronald Reagan, who was running for the GOP presidential nomination, by claiming that homosexuals in his staff were operating in the governor's office.
This is not criticism, it is merely stating that he used certain words. Until reliable secondary sources discuss his views in a manner that can be called criticism, it should not be included in this encyclopedia. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: If anyone can provide a citation showing that Pearson was employed at the Washington Post, I would love to see it. I've recently read two of his biographies and neither said that he worked for the Washington Post. He worked for two syndicates, first Scripps-Howard and later Bell. His column is often associated with The Post because it was his hometown subscriber (after summer 1942) and because it was probably his most high profile subscriber. The Post was however just one subscribing paper among about 600. 2601:142:200:38B0:9DFB:9311:BA46:6875 (talk) 12:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employer section 

message: Contrary to the uncited assertion in the text, Pearson's Dec 15, 1952 column contains no mention of Sen McCarthy.
The Dec 15 1953 column mentions McCarthy but presents only trivial insider information, not "dealing him a significant blow. " 
https://auislandora.wrlc.org/islandora/object/pearson%3A1?page=402&display=list 2600:1700:CA10:18A0:98FD:B58B:A373:8245 (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Sen McCarthy? 

message: Why has the whole paragraph "Tributes and Recognition" been removed? Wouldn't it be just fair - and also helpful - to mention some of the contemporary reactions to this well-known journalist's death? 2A02:1210:14FB:5800:C1CE:5E8B:23C6:DD78 (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained removal of whole paragraph