lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of defunct college football teams

message: Texas A&M-Corpus Christi is listed here and on List of Division I schools that have never sponsored football. Which is correct? --Latish redone (formerly All in) 22:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas A&M-Corpus Christi 

message: It seems like now this page has Small College progams that are not div-I in any sport. Should this page be re-named? Intrepidsfsu 14:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division 1 only? 

message: Texas Pan American and Arkansas Little Rock have notes saying they were Jucos at the time their programs disbanded, yet they are listed under Division I teams. I doubt this to be correct, so I'm going to move them to the non-D-I list. Strikehold (talk) 20:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced schools? 

message: Was this truly a college or was this one of several military training bases that fielded a team which played college teams? I know that the Marine Corp Recruit Depot and the Naval Training Center, both in San Diego, fielded teams which played college teams in Southern California. Wschart (talk) 04:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantico Marines 
Talk:Tony Ianno

message: There needs to be a standard format for Canadian Politicans.  Although my edit is nowhere near perfect, it is a start.  The categories could probably be changed, moved and such. Pete Peters 18:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Their Needs to be a Standard Format for Canadian Politicians

message: I removed the heading "Liberal leadership bid" since Ianno never actually ran in such a race. He only looked around and sought support. When that wasn't there, he didn't run. I left the text, although even that is of dubious notability. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 18:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal leadership bid 
Talk:NCAA Division I Football Championship

message: :Rated mid, despite WP:CFB's tendency to rate all I-AA items low because it's the championship. --MECU≈talk 23:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I know that the NCAA is wreaking havoc on all common sense with these silly names, but I don't think the topic sentence of this article makes sense.   The subdivision wouldn't be the game; wouldn't the I-AA final be the "NCAA Division I Football Championship Game" or something?    I thought the subdivision was what used to be known as D-I-AA, but the Division I article says, "The Division I-AA determines its champion in the NCAA Football Championship Subdivision, a 16-team, single-elimination tournament," implying that the subdivision is the whole tournament.   That makes more sense than saying the subdivision is a singe game, but the whole thing is still a mess.   Can someone knowledgeable fix it, hopefully with references?    Cheers, PhilipR 02:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A "Subdivision" is a football game? 

message: Someone took it upon themselves to delete info about the Ivy League and SWAC which he described as "crud."  I sourced it from other Wikipedia articles about the leagues and about the SWAC schools.  It is true info.  I would put it back, but I am concerned it will just get deleted again.  Timothy Horrigan (talk) 00:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted it the first time and I'll probably remove it this time as well. As you've stated the information about the Ivy and SWAC is located in other articles. This article is about the championship, format and teams who have won it. Geologik (talk) 01:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced Crud

message: The lead is at odds with itself, as to whether the article will be discussing a tournament, or a championship game (bolding added by me):
:The NCAA Division I Football Championship is an American college football tournament played each year to determine the champion of the NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS). Prior to 2006, the game was known as the NCAA Division I-AA Football Championship.
It's clear that the article has tight focus on the championship game itself, with some broad historical context. It is not about the tournament (playoff bracket). So, it would seem it would add clarity to rename this article  NCAA Division I Football Championship Game. That would align with the individual pages about specific games, for example 2019 NCAA Division I Football Championship Game. Much like FBS bowl games, such as Orange Bowl and 2017 Orange Bowl, 2018 Orange Bowl, etc. Comment or suggestion welcome from other editors. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: after reviewing the College Football Playoff National Championship article, which is about a championship game (without having "Game" in its title), I've updated this article's lead in a similar manner, which should be clearer to readers. Dmoore5556 (talk) 00:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournament or game?
Talk:NCAA Division II football championship

message: :Rated mid, despite WP:CFB's preference to rate anything non I-A low because it's the championship game. --MECU≈talk 23:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rated

message: Amazingly this article does not contain in references!  I have a question about polling.  I was working on some stuff about Pittsburg.  They were NAIA until 1989.  So how they could they be ranked #1 in NCAA in 1961? Americasroof (talk) 18:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for polling?
Talk:Sticky Fingaz

message: Selah.I don't like how this article was written, it shows him more as an actor when in fact he started as a Rapper and is better known for that.  I'm going to fix it. -Tainted Drifter
fix it? its still just bad. you put in an opinion without any source. "one of the most underated rappers"??according to who? You?! Plus you quote him without giving sources and it really is just poorly written. "muss less effort put in"?? again, according to who. i'm gonna delete all the opinions. 88.108.112.165
No, it was the word of 'critics' which are often cited in articles.  Also that quote is not only from an interview but it's from the song "Jackin' For Beats" where he says that exact line.  True fans of his would actually know, unlike dumb asses that seek attention by taking the role of an extremist enforcer of the rules of Wikipedia (such as yourself).--Tainted Drifter 20:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The line about him being an athiest is very assuming.  Just because someone doesn't believe in a religion, doesn't mean they are an athiest.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.95.144 (talk) 01:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?? 

message: On IMDB it says his birthday is November 3.  It makes sense that he was born in November, because that makes him a Scorpio, and on the song "Last Dayz" he says "I'm the SCORPION!"  So, November 3rd it is, unless any viable citations can be provided.--Tainted Drifter 08:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: Someone put "entered the Queens-based rap group Onyx with BROTHER Fredro Starr".  They're not brothers, they're cousins...  Also, they put "is known as the best concept album ever".  Well, the best concept album ever it may be, and is, but the Wikipedians will bitch 'bout that if it's left there.  I fixed it.Tainted Drifter 11:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Look...if we're going to go by the most recognized name of a celebrity/important person, he should be refered to by the name he's known by primarily.  Sticky Fingaz, not Kirk Jones.  Eminem isn't listed as Marshall Mathers.  Jay-Z isn't listed as Shawn Carter.  Nas isn't listed as Nasir Jones.  That's referred to in their biographical information.  Leaving this article like this just brings it down.  This should be fixed ASAP. DestradoZero 07:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sticky Fingaz, not Kirk Jones 

message: Film fails notability guidelines. Merge to Sticky Fingaz, where topic exists. Citrivescence (talk) 02:47, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I went ahead and redirected the article. While it's of an appreciable length, none of the content is from reliable sources, so it's not worth merging. signed, Rosguill talk 03:19, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   Makes sense to me. Thank you! Citrivescence (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Caught on Tape (film)]]
Talk:D-Loc

message: This article said
:D-Loc, Dustin Miller in Placentia, CA, ''
What was that intended to mean? That Miller was born in Placentia? Or that he lives there? Or something else -- Mikeblas 18:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dustin Miller is also the name of a Moto X rider who medaled at Winter X Games.  I'm slow working on X Games stuff at the moment, but I feel like the redirect for Dustin Miller could be better served with an article about the rider as opposed to a redirect.  I'll still include a link to this page at the top (:For the rapper, see D-Loc), but if D-Loc is better known by this name, it's the more likely search term and it's the best organizational method.  Thanks. matt91486 (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant names
Talk:Satana (Marvel Comics)

message: __TOC__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page at this time, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support, as nominator. PC78 17:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support, as nominator. PC78 17:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: #Oppose I would prefer to see the disambiguation page at the main slot. I don't think there's strong evidence that any of the possible Satana articles would be the most-likely-to-be-sought, thereby making it a more sensible choice. GassyGuy 22:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes
Talk:Sersi

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done the assessment - it is lacking any footnotes as well as nothing on the publication history/character development so it is somewhere in the start/C region and I'll leave it as it is. (Emperor (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Gregory Herd

message: Dolman, whose full name is Gray Dolman according to marvel.wikia.com references to a few comics (Amazing Spider-Man vol.2-3, and a few others), mentions having fought the X-Men on at least one occasion - this does not ring a bell? Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In those Spider-Man comics Dolman says that he fought the X-Men prior to that, but there is no note provided within the comic like they normally do, so I'm guessing they were planning to do a flashback to show that fight eventually and never actually did it. Spidey104 19:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dolman
Talk:Ono no Takamura

message: "Near that grave is a grave marked Murasaki Shikibu, with a legend that it was placed there by the devil himself as punishment for lust (愛欲, aiyoku) for which Murasaki Shikibu descended to hell." uhhh what? Per Murasaki Shikibu's article it seems she was universally venerated even during her lifetime. Does anyone have some context for this? It's also not clear what this has to do with Takamura aside from being in the same cemetery. Walkersam (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murasaki Shikibu "grave"
Talk:Shriek (character)

message: Making everyone in New York act psycho-violent isn't exactly a superpower, is it?
----------
This is her empathic power to the maximum extent  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.42.235.144 (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Why's she in the "Fictional Junk Dealers" category?  Is there some confusion between "junk" as in what Steptoe/Sanford & Son sell, and drugs?  Rojomoke (talk) 12:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junk Dealer? 

message: In the article you say the source of her powers is unknown, yet in the infobox you list human mutant. Which one is it? Has the comics ever actually said she has an X-gene to be a mutant?71.190.182.22 (talk) 03:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  source of powers?
Talk:Shroud (comics)

message: http://www.byrnerobotics.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=24296&TPN=1
Enda80 (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is speculation and not really relevant to the article. If there's an interview where the creators talk about it, it would be more worthy of inclusion. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious parallels with Doctor Doom's origin, as Doom's origin was later elaborated
Talk:Silver Fox (character)

message: "It is dissapointing that a white actress has been cast to play Silver Fox when it is know that the character is Native Canadian."
"the actor is playing as a native-american, most likely she will change ger skin tone for the film"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.37.9 (talk) 03:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The character story claims that she is not, but at least two other places of the article say otherwise. Luis Dantas 17:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, maybe not. "Silver Fox was a mutant whose superhuman powers were never revealed," according to Marvel's own page. --There are no names left (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Is she a mutant?

message: how can she be considered a mutant if she had no powers or abilities before weapon x? (Curefreak 22:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mutant? 

message: Was Silver Fox's full (birth) name actually revealed in the comics? --JB Adder | Talk 00:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?
Talk:Skullfire

message: I think the image should be changed. Tim could look like anything under that green energy. His distinctive face makeup and blue leather is the image us comic geeks most recall.
Lots42 04:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Image 
Talk:Sludge (comics)

message: While it is true that Rune's first appearance was in Sludge #1, it was in a short introductory piece separate from the main story; AFAIK Rune never met Sludge, certainly not in Sludge #1.  I corrected the wording of the article to reflect that. Luis Dantas (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rune's debut
Talk:Spoor (comics)

message: Why was this moved from Spoor (comics) to Spoor (comic book character)? Dr Archeville 10:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't. That's the problem. Just look at the article's edit history. It was sloppenly redirected to the "better/proper title". It had to be changed back per Wikipedia's editing policies or it would continue to be a violation of GNU Free Documentation License. Sadly, if you'll see the talk page and edit history of Juila, the user who made these edits, you'll notice she's been accused of sockpuppetry and has a history of making bad "move" attempts. Still, I suppose the article should suffer for her mistakes. Moving the right is always an option, even if it requires Admin help. I'll look into it. ACS (Wikipedian) Talk 16:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ahhh, I see.  Dr Archeville 12:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. It's unfornate the page has to suffer for her mistakes. I think I know an Administrator who can help, though. I'll contact him. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 19:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Spymaster (character)

message: Could someone find a picture of Spymaster with less terrible anatomy for the picture?  It's a bit unseemly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.22.167 (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: It seems nobody can agree on this. This article contradicts itself, citing Iron Man (Vol. 1) #254 in the infobox and Iron Man (Vol. 3) #8 in the article. The character's entry on the Comic Book Database cites Iron Man (Vol. 1) #330. Just wondering if anyone knows of any other trusted sources that can be turned to for this. Sonam8311 (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spymaster II first appearance

message: This article is way too short with the publication history and fictional character biography not that well developed, they both should be expanded in more detail than what they currently have so far.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:List of Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi episodes

message: Can this page look like the Billy and Mandy page? And the template should be mirrored also:
I dewikilinked all the episodes following my closing of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dis-Harmony / Collect All 5! / Ninjcompoop and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talent Suckers / Ole! / Mini-Puffs. Individual articles on every episode are unlikely to be sustainable.
However, there's no reason why this list shouldn't include brief synopses of the various episodes. See List of Scooby-Doo, Where are You! episodes for an example. --Sam Blanning(talk) 23:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this article being prodded anyways? It isn't listcruft, it's a list of episodes in a television show. If someone tags this one, then all the other lists (there's even a WikiProject for episode articles) would have to be deleted. Squirepants101 19:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I object deletion 

message: Why do so many of the short summary bits have nothing in them? This page is getting ugly, what with all the grammar probs that I fixed.RoryReloaded (talk) 09:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is a work in progress.  In due time, we should have a short summary for each episode.  Feel free to help out if you wish.  Personally, I don't usually take the time to contribute original content. --DarkAdonis255 (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: December 27, 2002?, I do not think that will be released that day, reverted to the original release. MS5 (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 27,2002? "Really no"
Talk:Arthur Tracy

message: Tried to clarify and categorize this page.  Help is welcomed. --Matthew 19:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We say "Abba Avrom Tracovutsky" and have done since 2006.  There is no source given, though.  All the sources I could find are 2007 or later.  Google books claims that Halliwell 1976 and Tracy's autobiography The Street Singer, 1997, have the name in them, unfortunately Google is smart enough to synonymize the two names if WP says they are the same person.
Other sources say his name was Harry Rosenberg.
# Whatever Became of ...?, Richard Lamparski, Crown Publishers, 1966, 1967 p 168
# May 14, 1937. The Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle, Milwaukee, Page 6
# 
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: WORLDCAT also supports both names. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:18, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth name
Talk:Hide and Creep

message: I think I wikified this article.  But how do I have the title changed?  It should be "Hide and Creep", not "Hide and creep."Konczewski 19:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: These story summaries are somewhat inaccurate, I will be re-writing them in my spare time to make them more accurate to the movie.
Magnus 19:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Mutant Liberation Front

message: According to the Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe A-Z Hardcover volume 8, the secret identities of the Humanity's Last Stand MLF members are as follows:
* Blindspot -- Kylie Kopeikin
* Burnout -- Kristine Calerly, replaced by Megan O'Toole
* Corpus Derelecti -- Michael Black, replaced by Adam Fisher
* Deadeye -- Mark Randall, replaced by Jay Burnell
* Thermal -- Molly Peterson
Khajidha (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humanity's Last Stand members 
Talk:Superia

message: Cap "deriding" her combat abilities happened during a fight, in which he was trying to get Superia to attack him and thus damage an airtight dome around her island, rendering her sterility plan useless. I don't think he really meant it, it was just a bit of psychologicakl warfare to take advanatge of her temper. That part of the description should probably be dropped. Noclevername 06:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tatterdemalion

message: Um... tap dance and bottlecap collecting? Stranger things have happened in the Marvel universe. Are these actual things referenced in the comics? -Fuzzy (talk) 16:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special abilities 

message: A dirty, shabbily clothed urchin.
A ragamuffin.
An urchin - poor and often mischievous city child.
A tattered or ragged person.
Used by Ben Jonson in 1611, spelt as tatter-de-Malian.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philhewitt (talk • contribs) 00:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was in search o something written by John Galsworthy.--Mishuletz (talk) 19:08, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Tempo (comics)

message: I removed the inclusion in the infobox as the reference in the article is stated as:
::"She is slated to appear in the upcoming X-Men Annual forming part of the new team of Acolytes alongside other villains such as Exodus, Frenzy, and Random."
Since that is a detail of an yet to be published story it should be treated as suspect. See here in the Project guidelines for why.
If the issue has been published, please up date the article as well as the infobox. In such a case, the Acolytes article would also need to be updated.
Thanks for listening... — J Greb 01:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acolytes 

message: Has it ever been made clear in canon if she actually manipulates time, or merely the perception of time? Noclevername 01:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Powers

message: I just flagged this article. It is in dire need of sources. --Guerillero (talk) 22:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: Removed numerous unnecessary citations.  The main reference improvement tag at the beginning of the article suffices.Onel5969 (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, CN tags tell an editor that a fact is likely to be challenged and therefore needs a citation. The tag on the top does not do that --Guerillero | My Talk 02:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, yes.  While a CN tag does exactly what you say it does, when a section, or entire article (as in this case), either is under-referenced or has no references, a tag at the beginning of the article or section in question suffices.  That's the purpose of those article and section tags, to get the same point across, without cluttering the body of the article.Onel5969 (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations
Talk:Thin Man (comics)

message: The story of Thin Man killing Agent Axis is from Marvel Comics Presents-- As soon as I find the issue I'll add proper cites. Noclevername 06:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section