Talk:Surma River

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition 

message: Sylheti word for river is "Gang" so why does it say the bengali word on Sylheti transliteration? There are folk songs talking about "Surma gang". 2A00:23C4:5F01:D600:FCA9:FB9E:1B9A:6E63 (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sylheti Language

message: The Kushiyara River is a branch of the Surma River, the article is short and duplicative of material in this article.  It would be more comprehensive to have Kushiyara River redirect here. --Bejnar (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are two separate strands of the same river, but they do have diffrent geographies and features they flow thru, affecting the social scenes of villages and towns in many different ways so maybe it is better to keep them separate and try to expand each article.Saajan99 (talk) 14:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Expansion doesn't seem to be working. --Bejnar (talk) 03:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

text: This group of rivers and their names is somewhat confusing. I can see that both the Surma and Kushiyara are branches of the Barak. Could they also be called branches/tributaries of the Meghna? Their (re)-joining marks the start of the name "Meghna", doesn't it? Pfly (talk) 10:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Also, can I ask why you added the cat & project "Assam"? I don't mind, but am curious. From what I understand (which I admit is not much!), the Surma is entirely, or nearly entirely in Bangladesh, no? Is it because of the Barak? Does it, or its drainage basin, extend into Assam? I recently have spent time trying to understand this river system, and it seemed odd that the Barak River does not have a page of its own. I understand that the Barak is a continuation of the Surma, in a sense, but then, can't the same be said for the Jamuna, Brahmaputra, and Yarlung Zangbo River? Or the Ganges and the Bhagirathi River, which have separate pages? Pfly (talk) 10:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflict) Yes. A bit confusing indeed. Barak originates from Manipur and flows in to the part of Assam which is called Barak Valley. It splits in to two at a place called Haritikar, near the India-Bangladesh border. One of the branches is then known as Surma and the other, Kushiyara. They rejoin in Bangladesh and is known as Meghna there. Technically, they are not the branches or tributaries of Meghna. I added the Assam template, because this river officially originates (if we are permitted to use the word "originates", as this is a natural continuation of Barak) from inside the territory of Assam. :) Shovon (talk) 10:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah ha, okay, thanks--I didn't realize the Barak flowed through Assam at all. The branching and rejoining and renaming is still confusing, but that kind of thing seems to be fairly common in the general region. Pfly (talk) 11:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Kushiyara River

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Surma_River. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed