lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tahbilk

message: Referenced text removed during c/e: From Winery per WP:COATRACK (doesn't belong in this article):
The twelve-member alliance includes Brown Brothers, Campbells, Taylors, DeBortoli, McWilliam’s, Tahbilk, Tyrell’s, Yalumba, D'Arenberg, Howard Park, Jim Barry and Henschke. The main criteria are that the family-owned companies: have a “landmark wine” in their portfolios listed under Langton’s Classification and/or 75% agreement by the group that a wine is considered “iconic”; have the ability to do at least a 20-year vertical tasting; have a history going back a minimum of two generations, ownership of vineyards more than 50 years old and/or ownership of distinguished sites which exemplify the best of terroir; show commitment to export and environmental best practice; have appropriate cellar door experience; and be paid-up members of the Winemakers Federation of Australia.
 Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants

message: Hello... I just added myself to the group - and then my barely in-control OCD took hold and made me do some clean up. I hope no one objects! 
Specifically, I made the display of the names more uniform, removing "User:" wherever it was present. (Some folks do not know how to properly use wikilinks!) I also deleted names which have no current WP account. There were quite a few. 
Finally, I have a question: Why are blocked accounts shown? Should these entries also be deleted? "RobP (talk) 03:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My preferences cause blocked user page links to be shown as striked.  Currently no member of the list appears to be blocked.  Thanks, — PaleoNeonate — 12:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List clean-up 

message: There appear to be two things that need to be done to add oneself to this group. One is to add oneself manually to the list on THIS page. However, This page indicates one needs to add an infobox to your own page. The problem is that neither of the two different pages giving the different instructions mention the other page. And the infobox on this page only links to one of the two via Join the Project. This is beyond confusing. RobP (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The userbox adds both an "ad" on the user's page and puts the page into the category :Category:WikiProject Skepticism members.  I don't think that adding the user name to the participants list can add the user in the category.  Another way to put a user in the category without using the userbox would be appending the category link at the bottom of the user's page.  Both the category and the participants list may therefore be useful, although I agree that it's a little redundant.  — PaleoNeonate — 12:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two methods to "Join" ?
Talk:7th Special Forces Group (United States)

message: In his book Inside Delta force , retired command sergeant major Eric L. Haney mentioned that one he was in Delta , he killed a gurrella leader in Honduras in 1981 and it appear later that the dead was american called David Arturo Báez from the 7th SF Group .--Jonybond 07:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed an obit posted by User:Dr. B. R. Lang as it is not pertinent to this article's Talk page. Alcarillo (talk) 19:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honduras , Nicaragua  

message: 10th SFG article states 77th SFG was form from 10th SFG personnel left at Bragg, so is 7th from 10th or 1st SSF?  Seeing it was a 8 year interim between 1st SSF disbandment until creation of of 77th SFG, it appears it probably is a formation from 10th SFG claiming links to 1st SSF, like US Rangers claim ancestral links to Roger's Rangers (a UK military formation consisting of American colonists, later given a name as "Queens Rangers" opposing America's Continental Army)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.115.238 (talk) 11:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry
Talk:Jonathan Dayton High School

message: Hello I'm a student at Jonathan DaytonAnd I was wondering who keeps on taking out the bit about Seth being school meteorologist, it's the truth and fun trivia too. 68.38.81.205 (talk) 22:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meteorologist
Talk:Justus Perthes

message: Does the article really belong as a biography? It seems more to be about the publications and to a lesser extent the publishing enterprise. LeadSongDog come howl! 16:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: HI, This is a discrepancy about the dates. Justus Perthes died in 1816, so how can his son be born in 1821? Also Bernhardt Wilhelm Perthes' son was born in in 1858. I suppose these dates are when he was in charge of his father's business, but it is very confusing, and should be fixed. Yann (talk) 10:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually there is a confusion between Wilhelm Perthes (1793-1853) and Bernhard Wilhelm Perthes, I (1821-1857). Yann (talk) 10:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernhardt Wilhelm Perthes (1821–1857)
Talk:Dralion

message: Somehow, this does not seem like the most objective article in the world, with unquoted phrases like "sure to stir the darkest soul" etc. Sounds like it's straight from the press release to me!
I completely agree.
"..The voices of Dralion sing an invented language to which only Cirque du Soleil holds the key..."
I've listened to the singing on Dralion over and over and all I hear is Italian.
Talashar 18:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity 
Talk:Lapsus

message: I don't see why not, they are the same topic, just different names.
64.178.96.166 05:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Clicking the "Haplologies" link, it seems they are something quite different to what this page describes them as. 83.151.195.33 (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haplologies 

message: "I'll explain this tornado later" - don't get that one. Peridon (talk) 13:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tornado?
Talk:Hong Kong Civil Service

message: 2007 Watson Wyatt survey: http://www.csb.gov.hk/english/admin/pay/files/final_report070515e.pdf
Methodolgy: http://www.info.gov.hk/archive/consult/2005/cs-e.pdf
Historic over-pay: However, civil service salaries in Hong Kong and Singapore ran ahead of the private sector during the same time (Chew 1993). Source: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPUBLICSECTORANDGOVERNANCE/EXTADMINISTRATIVEANDCIVILSERVICEREFORM/0,,contentMDK:20132995~menuPK:1919290~pagePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:286367,00.html citing Chew, David C. E. 1993. "Civil Service Pay in the Asian-Pacific Region." Asian Pacific Economic Literature 7(1), May.DOR (HK) (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes for future use
Talk:Mhlobo Jadezweni

message: I'm going to update the page. I will copy the original to my sandbox. Please let me know if there is anything I can add. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced page. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update page
Talk:Roberts Commissions

message: Based on information in Conn, et al, Guarding the United States and its Outposts, pp. 120-123, which I have cited, I've added information on accusations of espionage by Japanese Americans in the Roberts Commission report to this article, and to the articles on Internment of Japanese Americans, the Western Defense Command, and Gen. John L. DeWitt. Information on the report's accusations of Japanese espionage was previously absent from these articles. RobDuch (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not quite accurate. The Roberts Commission report vaguely accused Japanese consular agents and "others" of espionage, but made no mention of Japanese Americans. I've just added some additional information to your edit to make this clear. (Same for Internment of Japanese Americans.) MartinaDee (talk) 00:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for being more accurate about what the report said, while preserving the fact that it was used to justify Japanese-American incarceration. RobDuch (talk) 00:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "Being more accurate" needs better sourcing. In the John L. DeWitt article, in the last paragraph of section "World War II", the phrase "...the Roberts Commission report of January 25, 1942 accusing persons of Japanese ancestry of widespread espionage in Hawaii prior to Pearl Harbor..." was borrowed from the "Conn, et al" source document, which claims that's what the Roberts report says. Can someone with access to the Roberts report check out these conflicting claims? WCCasey (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese American espionage accusation
Talk:Walter Short

message: I removed an unsupported editorial comment about Stinnett's book that was intruded into a correction I offered concerning General Short's place in history.
Whether "all reputable historians disagree with Stinnett" is a matter for discussion, not an editorial comment intended to discredit an alternate view. The controversy over Stinnett's claims should be addressed separately. The person who made that (personal) observation has an axe of their own to grind, which we should DISCUSS. Whoever wishes people to read against Stinnett can offer citations same as I did.
Forgive my not knowing where to post this statement more appropriately.
Decahedonist (talk) 00:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, you obviously need to read WP:NPOV and in particular WP:UNDUE. Fringe views and conspiracy theories are supposed to be given less weight and, in any event, the opinions of other scholars about a given source are very much relevant. I tripped the Stinnett section and added sourced criticism of his book. Nsk92 (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding controversy about Stinnett's Book
Talk:Miss Universe 2002

message: Wy was Oxana Fedorova dethroned from her crown and title?
: SHE WASN'T DETHRONED! SHE GAVE UP HER CROWN VOLUNTARY!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.139.38.167 (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxana Fedorova 

message: The article states that the winner, Fedorova, was dethroned after four months.  The article should give some indication of what happened.   Does anyone know?  Please add.  Thanks.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 14:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winner
Talk:Bisentō

message: Somebody with more information will need to change this, but the Kukishinden Ryu Bisento legend places the introduction of the Bisento to Japan at sometime between the 12th and 14th centuries, brought by a warrior named Tetsujo (Tie Zhang Seng), following Izumo Kanja Yoshiteru's (early 1300s?) defeat at the hands of Fujiwara no Tadamachi (early to mid 1100s?). Since there is a historical innaccuracy in dates, Kukishinden Ryu history/legend may not be a reliable source.Stslavik 05:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy in the Dates 

message: This weapon we're talking about, the Bisentō (眉尖刀), What is it really? When I read the phrase "has various descriptions" it made me very skeptical as to whether or not it is even a real, classifiable weapon.
First of all, It says it's a Japanese pole weapon with a curved blade. Then just how is it different from the Naginata?  Are there any historical examples of it? I don't just mean illustrations or text references; I also mean physical, surviving artifacts.
I did a google image search for Bisentō, and only found huge manga/anime caricatures, and some wooden ninjutsu practice versions. My theory is that these are at best, exaggerated Naginata, at worst, fantasy weapons.
These are my reasons for thinking this way.
1- There is not enough information to classify Bisentō as a unique weapon, or even differentiate it from the Naginata.
2- There are no surviving historical examples of Bisentō. (at least none that I could find searching online)
3- In the Japanese dictionary website, jisho.orghttp://jisho.org/search/naginata 
 it lists the kanji (眉尖刀) as an alternative form for the term Naginata. Meaning 眉尖刀 also reads as "Naginata".
4- 眉尖刀 is also a Chinese term, and it reads as Méi Jiāndāo. It means Eyebrow Point Sabre (referring to the shape of a person's eyebrow as it points towards your ear). Found in the Ming Dynasty (1600's) military treatise, Wǔbèi ZhìMao, Yuanyi. Wu bei zhi yi bai san juan. Tai bei xian yong he shi: Hua shi, n.d. Print.
, (武備志) the Méi Jiāndāo is listed as a pole weapon, and it's illustration looks very much like the Naginata. 
a- It has the same narrow, curved, blade profile. 
b- the same disk-shaped guard piece, called Tsuba (鍔) in Japanese, and Hù Shǒu (護手) in Chinese.
c- the same metal rings that are called Semegane (せめがね) in Japanese. 
(These rings are used to reinforce the shaft from the blade's hidden tang construction.) 
Most other pole weapons do not have Semegane. I honestly believe they are the same weapon.
From these 4 points, I contest that the Bisentō and the Naginata are one and the same, and that the page should redirect back to Wikipedia's Naginata page.
ZhaoHistorian1 (talk) 10:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Another Name for Naginata?
Talk:Oblation

message: When I first tripped over this article, it contained an extensive rant about the former Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict the whatever.  Though I don't like the pope much either, I don't think a rant against him belongs in this article.  So I deleted it.  66.92.73.217 05:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was blanking.  I didn't see an edit summary.  If you believe this is a WP:BLP violation as it is unsourced, please put it in the edit summary.  Removing content without an ediut summary will usually result in a quick reversal.  There was nothing wrong with your edit except that it wasn't jsutified.  --Tbeatty 05:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Should a link be added for people looking for the "removal of material from the surface of an object by vaporization, chipping, or other erosive processes"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.252.153 (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ablation 

message: This looks like info for a media franchise that is written in an in-universe style and is uncited; can anyone put it into the appropriate article and not on this page?
Rebel shadow 22:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it's WAY too big for something so tangetial to the rest of the article. I'll pare it back.Euchrid (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture section 
Talk:Soseono

message: This article feels like it was lifted directly from the drama series--66.198.132.253 14:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a whole name, given name. It does not include a surname since surnames were not invented yet, stylizing it as So Seo-no would be incorrect. 召 is not a valid Korean surname according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Korean_surnames. Other Korean historical figures are like this as well, where there are no surnames. Surnames were a late invention comparatively, as covered in the Wikipedia page on Korean names. Thus Soseono is one name, not a surname with a generational and given name as is other later names. Other figures such as Ijinasi who date after her have similar lack of surnames. Common widespread use of surnames is more of a Joseon thing, not Three Kingdoms thing. --KimYunmi (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Soseono
Talk:Phanfare

message: Doesn't this article sound like an ad?  uyi 05:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: Some more links would be good, too. Have added some. --82.113.106.100 (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: I removed anything related to pricing, business model, licensing, or anything else that could be construed as advertising.  I also removed the on-site forum as a source not meeting RS, the external blog source for the same reason.  I also had to remove the links to WSJ from the article because they were sourced to PDFs on phanfare's site, and doing that is not only skewed towards positive press, but is also a copyright violation for us to use them in the article. MSJapan (talk) 04:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup notes
Talk:N-terminus

message: I'm suggesting to move this page to N-terminus. The reason for this is that N-terminus is the preferred term in textbooks and scientific literature. I did a PubMed search and came up with the following hits for N-terminus and its variations:
*N-terminus: 16,128 hits
*N-terminal domain: 6,194 hits
*Amino-terminus: 6,167 hits
*NH2-terminus: 1,875 hits
*N-terminal end: 1,016 hits
*N-terminal tail: 309 hits
*Amine-terminus: 21 hits
- tameeria 02:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: I'm not sure I like the reference to zip codes. Do you think we could remove that, or at least find a better analogy? Abergabe (talk) 15:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zip Codes? 

message: Could someone please add an authoritative statement regarding how the N-Terminus does or does not correspond to 5-prime and 3-prime ends of the mRNA? Gwideman (talk) 23:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  N-Terminus versus 5' and 3' ends of mRNA?
Talk:File folder

message: "In the United States, file folders can easily be purchased at office supply stores."
Is "In the United States" really necessary? They are available almost anywhere in the World at office supply stores.
I have omitted that portion.
Well, I think it was really necessary. Looks like you're from Australia? So we know that they are easily available in the US, the UK and Australia. There is no way to buy them in Poland. Maybe I will make some myself... Trosmisiek (talk) 14:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 

message: "In the UK, one of the oldest and best known filing companies is Railex" - Hi, I am a first time user so please excuse my ignorance.  Railex is 100 years old next year and I would like to add an article on its history, however as I work for Railex there is an obvious conflict of interest.  Would this be a worthy addition? David Windsor 10:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railex - history article 

message: What are the icons from the various OSs doing in an article barely related to them? --soum talk 07:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icons 

message: Should be included on this.
I believe a manilla folder is around ph 5.5. I have, however, seen manilla used as a cheap binding material for leaflets. My understanding is because it's a strong paper like craft paper, it's a cheap way to make cardstock suitable for file folders.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.172.127 (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acidicity and Archival qualities 

message: The last paragraph in "Termonology" might be cleaned up if one recognizes "file" as a verb and "folder", certainly, as a noun.  COnsider that the computer files are lined up in bits on a chip to be read by a processing program.
Liberty5651 (talk) 21:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider that "file" is a verb. 

message: Files may also contain other things like magazines, cased in music CDs, etc. sometimes mostly not used for any official use, rather used as normal storage in a home.
I just fixed cd's to CDs, but it needs further work. — MaxEnt 21:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-par sentence in lead
Talk:Subspace (Star Trek)

message: There was a merge tag to Hyperspace (science fiction), but no talk about it on either talk pages. If nobody discussed it, seems unlikely that anybody proposed a merge in the first place (save for the tagger). Secondly, the quote attributed to Geordi was incorrect, that was fixed, unless my version of Schisms differs from the broadcast version or something. S7evyn (talk) 06:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote and Tag
Talk:Star Wreck (novel series)

message: I've added a link from the sentence in the Star Trek article about parodies, so now there are three links to this article, and the orphan tag can be removed.
Doing a copyedit, I also tried to remove some of the original research, but wasn't entirely successful. So the cleanup tag is removed, but the original research tag stays.
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 21:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements made, a couple tags removed

message: This is not linked to the Finnish fan-film parody series of the same name, right?--92.114.148.141 (talk) 12:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official parody?
Talk:Star Trekkin'

message: Should mention the music video... AnonMoos (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In Errand of Mercy Spock says about the Organians: "Fascinating. Pure energy. Pure thought. Totally incorporeal. Not life as we know it at all." 216.54.205.2 (talk) 14:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life as we know it 

message: I would challenge the description of the song as a parody - it is not a topical rewrite of an existing song, which I would argue is the accepted definition of a song parody.85.210.10.45 (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody? 

message: In UK Science Fiction Fandom, It's sometimes been said (ObPersonal) that this was an adaptation of an existing Filk song which the named copyrighters appropriated from the zeitgeist. (Compare the controversy over the Hokey cokey.) Does anyone know of evidence either way? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 185.74.232.130 (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  The original Sealed Knot song dates from to the mid-70's, considerably earlier than the attribution in the article. Monstrelet (talk) 22:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Originality? 

message: Where can a note about this version get added? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU5g_5pYFUo&ab_channel=ken205726  There sang the version... that is some feet. --Crazyseiko (talk) 10:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish Version
Talk:Bioculture

message: Does anyone else feel the definition in teh intro needs a rewrite for clarity?  RJFJR (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its the nature of the subject :). If you can do better, go ahead and try. DGG (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dateline (Australian TV program)

message: HI MY NAME IS MAVIS ,I WATCH YOUR SHOW ON THE SHARKS .I REALY THINK THAT ALL THOES BIG BOAT THAT HAVE THOES LONG NETS THAT GO FOR MILES AND THAKE ALL FISH BIG OR SMALL SO THE SHARKS ARE RUNNING OUT OF FOOD .IT IS ONLY MAKING THE SHARKS COME IN TO WERE PEOPLE ARE SWIMMING ,SO WE ALL HAVE TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE SO WE CAN DO SOME THING TO FIX IT .AS WE NEED THE SHARKS TO KEEP THE BALANCE OF THE SEA  YOURS MAVIS GREEN THANK YOU .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.191.28 (talk) 08:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)