Talk:Govigama

message: This is nothing but Karavan propaganda and is written from a point of view to denigrate the Govigama caste. If this does not become a neutral article, this should be deleted.Bandara2000 13:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute

message: ‘’ Social divisions arose over the centuries between those engaged in agriculture and those engaged in nonagricultural occupations. The Govi (cultivators) belonged to the highest Sinhalese caste (Goyigama) and remained so in the late twentieth century. All Sri Lankan heads of state have, since independence, belonged to the Goyigama caste, as do about half of all Sinhalese. The importance of cultivation on the island is also reflected in the caste structure of the Hindu Tamils, among whom the Vellala (cultivator) is the highest caste’’
‘’ Government (from Sri Lanka) Kingship was the unifying political institution in the classical ... Administrative officials were drawn from the Govi caste’’
The caste system in Sri Lanka developed its own characteristics. ... The Govi (cultivators) belonged to the highest Sinhalese caste (Goyigama) and remained 
Seminal study on contemporary Sri Lankan Sinhalese society by Michel Roberts mentions Govi dominance, historic and current   Professor Gananath Obeyesekerehe treatment of ordinary farmer (govigama) caste in many parts of the Sinhala country . 
Hence this currently non neutral article should be edited taking into acount WP:NPOV. It should be edited taking into account all point of view including the Karave caste members and other historic assertion of Govi as lower caste but only as a minor point of view because the consensus of all modern  credible anthropologists and historians is that Govi have always  dominated the Sinhalese society. That is what anyone will read in any encyclopedia that is not based a castist narrow collection of non credible biased sources. If this is not done within a reasonable amount of time then I propose that this article should be tagged for AFD and at least then it will get the attention of other editors to a perennial problem that Wikipedia faces with respect to [[caste[[ related  articles in which each caste affiliates trying to impose their myth and views on the rest of the world. This particular attempt so far is under the radar screen because Sri Lanka is a small country without many editors. Removing the current tags without justification when the whole article seems to be not neutral, based on original research not backed by credible sources and under dispute will be considered Vandalism and the remover has been thus warned. Thanks   Bandara2000 21:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag rationale

message: The references given by you above are all from secondary sources. Furthermore secondary sources with outdated information 
Before it was debunked in the 1990s, the ‘Govi Supremacy Myth’ was, and still is, actively promoted by interested individuals. Such individuals have managed to get it incorporated into many modern publications of unsuspecting authors and onto public domains as you are now attempting to do. The frequent repetition of  the ‘Govi Supremacy Myth’ or the  ‘Vellala Supremacy Myth’  which appears to be of greater importance to you,  does not turn the myth into fact. It may appear on endless web sites but no historical evidence has yet been produced to validate it. 
Sri Lanka is a country with over 2000 years of written history. Therefore if, as you say, the above references are selective, you should be able to produce at least some evidence from Sri Lanka’s pre-colonial history to contradict the above facts. 
Although the above facts are not to your liking, they are from authentic Sri lankan historical manuscripts. The  authenticity of the quoted sources have never been in doubt and they have been edited and published by several eminent scholars. The historically low status of the Govi caste as evidenced in these  sources has never been contradicted so far by any other historical sources. 
If you have any evidence, anything at all, to contradict the above quoted historical references and re-establish your myth, please state it here. Childishly deleting the referenced information on this page merely because you have a different point of view (albeit with no historical justification so far) amounts to blatant vandalism.  --Veri 13:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Bandara2000], stop your vandalism  

message: This article is ridiculous. Paragraphs upon paragraphs of text with zero citations. I'm tagging, and getting rid of the completely uncited list of people. --snowolfD4 (  talk /  @  ) 21:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My quick count found seventeen (17) proper parenthetical citations, in addition to the eight footnotes to six sources.  How many of those did you find?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's see. One citation in the "history" section, zero citations for the "rise of" section, one citation for the "current political power" section, one citation for the "religious power" section. --snowolfD4 (  talk /  @  ) 18:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This page has lot of errors. It talk about two caste which ""Sri Lanka"" never had. Ksheteria and Brahmin. It is very much clear Buddhist country couldn't have a caste called Brahmin(Hindu priests). Second Ksheteria myth. Sri Lankan caste start with King. Some people have misunderstood difference between king and kshateria(India). In India king belongs to kshateria and king should married to kshateria princess. But Sri Lanka never had kshateria. So king had to married to a daughter/sister of a ruling  king. If there were only one king, consort was imported from South India. If kshateria was there no needed to import royalist from south India.
Also some people clarification of Wimaladarmasuriya I is a Brahmin, Brahmin had authority to rule is a nonconstructive sentence. Wimaladarmasuriya is forcefully married Kusumasana devi who was heir to the Throne of Kandy. That's how Wimaladarmasuriya came to throne. After Wimaladarmasuriya's dead Senerath also married to Kusumasana devi who had 2 children from Wimaladarmasuriya. It was norm that king's brother should be next king. It is very much evident Wimaladarmasuriya/Senerat didn't came from royal blood line( Kshateria or Brahmin caste). What they had was they were married to heir of the Kandy throne. If Senerat didn't marry to Kusumasana devi he will not be the king even he was brother of the Wimaladarmasuriya. --Himesh84 (talk) 06:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Kshateria Brahmin Myth

message: This article is a complete mess. I am currently unable to edit as a logged-in user but should be able to do so before much longer. When I can, I'll be taking a hatchet to the thing based on my experience of dealing with Indian caste articles. Let's say, that gives people a fortnight or so to attempt to source things, remove the puffery etc.Obviously, I'll do some research before cutting back but I am already fairly sure that much of the content has no chance of decent verification.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 02:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is a mess. I will try to clean it according to wikipedia standards. Xenani (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disastrous article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Govigama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160102192549/http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/03/11/sri-lanka-revoke-british-governor%E2%80%99s-infamous-gazette-notification to http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/03/11/sri-lanka-revoke-british-governor%E2%80%99s-infamous-gazette-notification
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have noticed that the information in this page have been distorted by numerous people at least for 10 years since 2009 based on their personal views. 
As a Scholar of Archaeology and Anthropology I have edited the page with reliable information from the references given below. Hope that no one will distort the page again. 
* Maha Vansha - Ven. Mahanama
* Deepa Vansha
* Janavansha- Ven Buddha Rakshita, 15 th century
* Sadhdharma Rathnavali
* Poojavali
* Mandārampura Puvata (C.17th century)
* Prof.Pranavithana 1970 (The Celebrated Archaeologist)
* The dictionary of the proverbs of Sinhalese - John M Senevirathna 1936
* Dutch Thombos van Seylan (Dutch records of Ceylon), Dutch Governorate of Ceylon 1640-1796
* An Historical Relation of the Island Ceylon-Robert Knox, English sea captain in the service of the British East India Company.1681
* Cordiner-1807
* The caste of Sinhalese From Ancient Times to the Present Day- Asiff Hussein B.A. (Social Sciences) PGr.Dip (Archaeology)
* An account of the interior of the Ceylon - John Davy, 1821(John Davy (1790-1868) was an English doctor and brother of the celebrated chemist Sir Humphrey Davy.)
* Notes and Queries. The Taprobanian. Dec.1885 - Hugh Nevil
* Indid race - Humanphenotypes.com (http://Humanphenotypes.com)
* Unambuve parapura, a manuscript written around the 16th or 17th century and found by Hugh Nevill in the village of Unambuve (BMOM 6605)
* Purāna sāmpradāyika kalundā ga� koṭuva in Aitihāsika Mātale (1984)
* Family genealogies in the study of pre-colonial Kandyan society and Polity. K.P.Vimaladharma. JRAASL. 2000 Joshua Nazareth (talk) 03:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last edit to this page 

message: No one should be abled to delete or hide the historical facts that I have added to this page based on the research  of Dr.Asiff Hussein's caste of Sri Lanka . Joshua Nazareth (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Your version, , did not seem to follow wikipedian guidelines. I clearly stated in my edit, , why your edit was reverted. To make it more clear, make yourself familiar with the wikipedia policies: WP:CS, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:TONE and WP:RS. Xenani (talk) 11:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenani is Distorting the page based on his or her  biased mindset 

message: This article is not adhering to WP:NEUTRAL at all and has significant shortcomings with regards to structure and content. I understand that caste is a very contentious topic, but it would be great to not use Wikipedia as a platform for targetted attacks against any groups of people. Uvants (talk) 09:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: E.g.: The article posits: "They were from lowest position in the existing caste hierarchy in South India who landed and settled the county over." The source used for this is  which mentions no such thing. Uvants (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial editing need