lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse/Primetime

message: Does  look like an earlier incarnation? He was blocked indefinitely July 2005 for copyvios. -Will Beback 05:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rickyboy

message: I could not use WP:PT because it was already used. I came up with this one because the apostrophe can be used in mathematics to mean "prime". Jesse Viviano 21:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: HeH, I thought it was an industry lingo thing... 68.39.174.238 18:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortcut created: WP:'T 

message: Primetime's noxious pupet on es ("El Periodico") has been blocked! 68.39.174.238 01:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yahh OOO!¡! 

message: It appears to me that  and  are Primetime socks. Before his banning Primetime was active in trying to find loopholes to preserve lists from deletion, and L.E.'s campaign to rename slang "lists" to "glossaries" appears consistent with that effort. Also, L.E. has no previous edit hsitory, so he is apparently the sock of someone. The accounts may have gone dormant, but I've asked for a response. -Will Beback 04:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Expert 

message: If that's really him, he's uploaded a LOAD of images on Commons... 68.39.174.238 06:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. I've posted a note on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems explaining the matter. -Will Beback · † · 07:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's been confirmed, almost all of his uploads are blatant plagairism. Most are up for deletion now. 68.39.174.238 22:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They've all be deleted except for two, which might actually be free. 68.39.174.238 20:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "HQCentral" 

message: ...sockpuppets do we need to list? Some of the IPs definitely, the categories certainly, but all those wiktionary accounts? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given his tireless nature, yeah, we do need to keep track. --Calton | Talk 02:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many...
Talk:Guam rail

message: I'm surprised because according to HBW (https://www.hbw.com/species/guam-rail-hypotaenidia-owstoni) or San Diego Zoo website (https://animals.sandiegozoo.org/animals/guam-rail) Guam rails are not flightless, and are able to even fly some meters, although the species in question has very reduced flight muscles and normally is reluctant to take the air (that's why they're called virtually flightless). Is this information correct or the Wikipedia article needs to be changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.16.224.41 (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate information?
Talk:AD 311

message: This page should redirect to disambiguation, it has too many other meanings than just the year Rm999 04:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it shouldn't, since Wikipedia policy states that articles consisting of just digits should be about the year, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates). /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 08:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, but there should be a link to the other meanings, like 911. The two main links I can think of are the phone number in the US, and the band. Rm999 09:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply click on the link on top of the page, and you'll arrive at the disambiguation page where you'll find links to those other meanings. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 09:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 

message: now redirects to AD 311.  Is there consensus to move 311 (disambiguation) to 311, or do we need a second RM for that? Certes (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put in a technical request to move that page as well. I forgot the page redirects here. Interstellarity (talk) 14:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  311 redirects here
Talk:Happy?

message: If someone goes to the trouble of typing "happy" and ending it with a "?" my hunch is they are hunting for the song, or one of the two almbums listed. 
My inclination is to give them the simplest route to that... granted the happy disambig isn't huge... 
Anyway those are my thoughts, open to hearing others. Sethie 04:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah id say make this a disambig with the song and two albums♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

text: fuck it, im going for it♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 22:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Windows NT processor scheduling

message: Needs re-write to make it clear what is MS Windows-specific and what is generic--MichaelMaggs 06:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or rename to "Processor scheduling (Windows)". Jakew 22:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write

message: This article is a stub and should be expanded. Some examples to explain how the priorities actually affect each other, as well as the wait time's affect, should be included. I would also like to see some info on the differences NT gives between dynamic and real time, and if the difference between "level 15" and "16" is all that much (is it nomenclature and is it actually good for a soft real time system). I know some of the answers, but not enough to actually expand the article w/ good sources and what not. 161.31.231.168 (talk) 04:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Patricia Lascelles, Countess of Harewood

message: "At the time, British law prohibited relatives of the queen from marrying in England." That doesn't make any sense. Surely the issue was that Lord Harewood (who despite being the Queen's first cousin is not an HRH because he is a female-line grandson of George V) was divorced and marrying the divorced mother of his illegitimate son. Would someone please clear this up? TysK 06:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed

message: There is scant reference to her most usual name Bambi.  My understanding is that she was widely known as Bambi Tuckwell before she ever met Athol Shmith, and remains Bambi to her friends and family to this day.  She is referred to as such in the media and generally, except in the most formal of contexts, when she is Patricia.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 20:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bambi
Talk:NHL on NBC

message: I've noticed that Soxrock keeps altering the first set of sentence on the page (which I really don't appriciate). I already have the anagram for the National Broadcasting Company (the full name for NBC) being clickable.  I don't understand how you don't want me to list what the letters NBC stands for just like the letters NHL.TMC1982 June 12, 2006 (UTC)
=== NBC ===
The reason is is that they legally abandoned the meaning behind the initialism... so I'm simply putting "NBC" instead of "National Broadcasting Company". Soxrock 19:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reason is is that they legally abandoned the meaning behind the initialism... so I'm simply putting "NBC" instead of "National Broadcasting Company". Soxrock 19:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC 

message: It should be NHL on NBC. There is no "The" anywhere on any logo or on the NBC website that would imply the title as The NHL on NBC. This is similar to the NBA on NBC which was changed to the correct title not too long ago. --Zimbabweed 22:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page, per the listing at WP:RM#Uncontroversial proposals. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect title

message: Formal request has been received to merge: NHL on Versus into NHL on NBC; dated: February 2023. Proposer's Rationale: Both networks were owned by the same company and there were many similarities in their coverage. They might as well be one and the same. ~100.7.44.80.  Discuss here. GenQuest "scribble" 04:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-Listed. GenQuest "scribble" 23:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Multiple Personality Detective Psycho

message: MPD Psycho has the most absurdly complex storyline - good luck to anyone who tries to summarise it!
Just started reading this, but from what I read, isn't it actually Yousuke's girlfriend instead of Yousuke's wife?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.200.142.102 (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complexity

message: At the end of the Dark Horse edition of volume 1 a note from the author mentions hesitence from the publisher printing the manga in a Shonen magazine. Was Comic Charge always where this was serialized? -Annon3  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.215.40 (talk) 01:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic 

message: The TV series is listed as an anime at the bottom when it isnt. Also think it deserves a mention tht the series has frequant use of pixelation on gore in all releases.
--94.193.66.60 (talk) 08:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the "anime" bit.  I refrained from mentioning the pixelation because I have not seen it, so it would be better for someone who did to describe it. Luis Dantas (talk) 23:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV series
Talk:MSM-01 Zaku Marine Type

message: Again, as with the merge proposal I made at FA-78-1 Gundam Full Armor Type, it might be better, given the dearth of info here, to merge it into the MS-06 article.  In addition, the material in this article could use some work and revision. Maikeru 23:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[MS-06 Zaku II]]?
Talk:Faust (disambiguation)

message: I've added a subset of articles I found on the Faust article.  My criteria is those that are actually called Faust (or Faust is a key word in the title) and were "notable."  The idea is if people are looking for those, they are likely to enter Faust.  Putting these here will save those people searching the list. John (Jwy) 06:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My criteria
Talk:Tancred, Prince of Galilee

message: The following sentence does not make sense:
"In 1099 during the assault on Jerusalem Tancred, along with Gaston IV of Béarn, or Gaston of Beert was the first Crusader to enter the city on July 15."
A comma should be inserted between "Jerusalem" and "Tancred", and another between "Beert" and "was"; but beyond that, there's the question of who is the subject of the verb, "was".  If Tancred was the first to enter Jerusalem, and Gaston was with him, then "along with" is inappropriate; "accompanied by" would work.  But if the two of them were first, then "was" must change to "were" and "Crusader" to "Crusaders"; and again "along with" should be changed, in this case to "and".  Incidentally, I don't think "crusader" should be capitalized, and I'd prefer to see a comma after "in 1099".  I'm assuming, though the text is ambiguous, that the two "Gaston" appelations refer to the same person.
-- Marshall Price (user D021317c), June 8, 2006, 2:09 AM (EDT)
:I think I've fixed it...how is it now? The bigger problem, I think, is that various people claimed to be the first to enter the city, so I've alluded to that as well. Adam Bishop 06:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "He and Gaston took hundreds of Muslim prisoners, providing protection to some on the roof of the Temple. However, the following morning he issued a command to the Crusaders to proceed to the Temple and kill the rest of the population that had been assembled there, Muslim and Jewish, both male and female. It may have been that the Western Europeans could not distinguish between the features of the Arab and Jewish populace."
It was my understanding that Tancred gave protection to those utop the Al-Aqsa Mosque and that they were massacred against his wishes. The above paragraph makes it sound like he ordered them to be killed. But at the bottom, it says the Crusaders couldn't "distinguish between the features of the Arab and jewish populace." What does this mean? Does this mean he sent the crusaders to kill just the Jews, but all were killed instead? (!Mi luchador nombre es amoladora de la carne y traigo el dolor! 20:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure there is an answer to this...different sources say different things. It is my understanding that he tried to save some of the Muslims, presumably to ransom them, but someone else ordered them to be killed against his wishes. I'll look around to see what the consensus is. Adam Bishop 22:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for helping me out. (!Mi luchador nombre es amoladora de la carne y traigo el dolor! 22:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Confused!!! 

message: The article says Tancred refused altogether to swear the oath to Alexius. This is false. He refused to swear at Constantinople; however, after the capture of Nicaea, he so swore. It is said in Runciman, volume 1.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.167.154 (talk) 04:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect factoid
Talk:GQ (actor)

message: Well, he has an IMDB  - but yeah he doesn't look too notable. Also most of this article seems to be copy-pasted off IMDB, including, oddly, the description of him as "brilliant" (which I removed). —EatMyShortz 06:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looked suspicously like vanity to me. I'm tempted to haul it to AfD. He only has 400-800 google hits, depending on whether you include his middle initial, but I suppose we can give it to him based on his leading and near-leading roles in a bunch of bad movies and TV shows: Jonny Zero, Just Another Story, and Scratch & Burn.  --Chaser T 06:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this guy is definitely notable in the sense that most of our actor entries are. A few big supporting roles in widely released films, i.e. On the Line, etc. Mad Jack 23:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Maetel Legend

message: Just FYI guys the central park media link is dead, those guys are long gone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.222.30.10 (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Open educational resources

message: Here is a link to a current article on OER research based on the COUP framework, found in Bliss (2013). It is a class project hoping to be finished within the next couple of weeks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peteforsyth/OER_research_Wikidojo_article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodily11 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: OER Research

message: I added a brief mention of the Sofia project in the 'history' section of the article. This info is in the Internet Archive but I'm not sure that it's referenced properly? Please correct, if possible/necessary. Redwidgeon (talk) 04:49, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  referencing Internet Archive? 

message: There aren't any, AFAISI.
But anyway, there is one that lingered in the See also paragraph, with outdated URL:
* 
Kku (talk) 11:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  no more external links?
Talk:Mai, the Psychic Girl

message: the title of this comic book is simply 'Mai', not 'mai the psychic girl'.  the title of the article ought to be changed accordingly and persons looking for 'mai the psychic girl' could then be redirected here instead of the other way around.
98.16.5.63 (talk) 20:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The English title of the manga is Mai, the Psychic Girl. English localized titles are given priority over original Japanese titles. See WP:USEENGLISH.--Remurmur (talk) 22:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Human dignity

message: Human dignity is not a controversial idea and by sheer numbers the very idea of speciesism is. perhaps contested is a better word? human dignity is contested by those who claim it is a form of speciesism? 
64.89.153.51 11:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I request polite comment on whether the section on the German Constitution should be moved to the article: Dignity.
In my opinion, the section--because it illustrates the difficulty of applying laws which have no rational foundation would--with a few changes--fit well with the article:Dignity. Pyrrhon8 (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Pyrrhon - I'm about to merge the two articles into this article (per the AfD discussion), and that section will be moved over as well.  give me a bit - I'm working on it now.  --Ludwigs2 01:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 

message: pursuant to this AfD discussion, I'm merging this article into Dignity.  most of the material has been transferred, though it needs more integration at the moment.  --Ludwigs2 02:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect from merge.
Talk:Bloomers

message: That is all. (Psychro 05:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Vandalism please 

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 06:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed 

message: Does this article really need that section? Even if it does, is the example cited really the most important, and shouldn't it cite more context? Shinobu 15:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese bloomers in pop-culture 

message: Most Japanese people call bloomer as buruma. And some people use the word burumā deliberately because they hate sexual image of it. Most don't understand what is burūmā but something like [VROOOM] (Japanese sound burūmu).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.211.131.65 (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese pronounciation 

message: Perhaps a subsection on Petti Pants would be a good idea? --Sailor Titan (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petti Pants 

message: The part about Japanese bloomers shouldn't really be under the Undergarments heading since burumā are not actually underpants, even if they resemble them somewhat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.79.71.242 (talk) 12:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese bloomers 

message: Thoughts on merging this page with pettipants? This page focuses mostly on the historical usage of the term "bloomers," but modern-day usage usually refers to something closer to what's described in the article for pettipants. remainsuncertain (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge w/ pettipants?
Talk:Bogoljub Kočović

message: I have removed this tag. The article is a correct one & written in a balanced manner. There is absolutely no reason for this tag to remain. In fact, it should not have appeared at all. Mir Harven 08:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality standards ?

message: I removed two sentences:
*The calculations so depended on the population growth rate, which was assumed and for which no reliable data existed, and Kocovic said that the results should be interpreted carefully, as a rough estimate given that the available data were limited. - This sentence is just repeating the content of the two sentences before it. A point does not become more important by being repeated over and over again.
*Because of this, Zerjavic was frequently described as a manipulator, who doctored numbers based on unreliable data to suit his nationalistic agenda. - This is an accusation against a person. If no relevant references are provided, it is assumed this is the POV of the user who posted it, so it must be removed. In fact, since the article on that person exists, the controversy about him should be moved there. This is an article about Kočović, not Žerjavić. I suspect this could be a case of disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point.
--Zmaj 08:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed two sentences
Talk:Unitard

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 06:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed 
Talk:Ranoidea chloris

message: Litoria chloris does not extend from north of Sydney to Cape York, at least not any more.
The distribution was not continuous, and the northern population was described as Litoria xanthomera by Davies, McDonald and Adams, in 1986.  Common name is Orange-thighed Frog.
Stevew139 06:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone should have picked up on that mistake before-its fixed now. Thanks for pointing it out.--Tnarg 12345 11:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This sounds pretty dramatic - is this then the cure for AIDS?  Please add more detail - on its own it seems amazing but is not backed up.  That is, I would expect citations and some information on how this information is being used.  Robinson weijman (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tagged it with a fact tag in which it needs. Bidgee (talk) 09:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no expert, but in the reference section, it has a reference: Frog secretions block HIV infections which may be related.  Also, you could have googled it and found a reference faster than posting here.   PirateArgh!!1! 17:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kills HIV? 

message: ?? 167.179.174.55 (talk) 08:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it poisonous
Talk:Jason Grimsley

message: Did Grimsley ever do anything other than use performance-enhancing drugs?  This article doesn't make it seem that way.  It's a terrible article because it is so twisted in that respect.  How about some details about his career? Yesitsnot (talk) 07:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolute garbage 

message: Someone following this case more closely than I should take a look at 
*Pitcher Spills Steroid, Speed Secrets, from The Smoking Gun
and see if anything can be added to this article.  66.167.138.6 06:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already there, as the first cite. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More details available from court papers

message: I've removed the Keith Olbermann note from June 7th  since it's been there long enough without a citation. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keith Olbermann note removed 

message: Does the section on his steroid use have to be so long? It dramatically out-lengths every other section. --Coingeek (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted one unsourced paragraph, but I'm not sure it needs much more condensing. Grimsley was very important to the steroid scandal and is certainly what he will mostly be remembered for. --Jprg1966 (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug Use 

message: I'm proposing that that section be shortened and that a new article be created for the "Grimsley Affardavit" with a link to said article on this page. --Coingeek (talk) 00:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grimsley Affardavit 