lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Exponential hierarchy

message: Can I ask for references where this concept is defined? I tried searching for "exponential hierarchy" on google but found a paper with a different definition . Andris 14:13, May 19, 2004 (UTC)
:I was relying on Papadimitriou, "Computational Complexity", page 498.  The paper you cite is discussing the strong exponential hierarchy (which generalizes E and NE rather than EXPTIME and NEXPTIME). Gdr 11:23, 2004 May 20 (UTC)
::Thanks! I found Papadimitriou's book and it's there. I am still wondering if the exponential hierarchy with quantifiers that he briefly defines on page 497 is the same as the one from page 498 that you quote. I will think about that.  Andris 22:13, May 20, 2004 (UTC)
:::Yes, these two mentions of "exponential hierarchy" are in adjacent paragraphs and are referring to the same thing! Gdr 15:38, 2004 Jul 20 (UTC)
This article is extremely misleading. In every single paper I’ve seen, except for the (rather unclear, because it seems to use the term in two completely different meanings) offending quote from Papadimitriou, the unqualified term “exponential hierarchy” refers to one of the following two things:
*\mathrm{EH}=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty\Sigma^E_n, where \Sigma^E_n=\mathrm{NE}^{\Sigma^P_{n-1}} (mind the P). One also defines \Pi^E_n=\mathrm{coNE}^{\Sigma^P_{n-1}}, \Delta^E_n=\mathrm E^{\Sigma^P_{n-1}}. Equivalently, a language L is in \Sigma^E_n iff it can be written as
::x\in L\iff\exists y_1\,\forall y_2\dots Qy_n\,R(x,y_1,\dots,y_n),
:where R(x,y_1,\dots,y_n) is computable in time 2^{O(|x|)} (which implicitly bounds the length of yi, so that I don’t have to write it in the formula above). Also equivalently, EH = ATIMEALT(2O(n),O(1)).
*\mathrm{EXPH}=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty\Sigma^{EXP}_n, where \Sigma^{EXP}_n=\mathrm{NEXP}^{\Sigma^P_{n-1}}, and again \Pi^{EXP}_n=\mathrm{coNEXP}^{\Sigma^P_{n-1}}, \Delta^{EXP}_n=\mathrm{EXP}^{\Sigma^P_{n-1}}. Equivalently, a language L is in \Sigma^{EXP}_n iff it can be written as
::x\in L\iff\exists y_1\,\forall y_2\dots Qy_n\,R(x,y_1,\dots,y_n),
:where R(x,y_1,\dots,y_n) is computable in time 2^{|x|^{O(1)}} (which again implicitly bounds the length of yi). Equivalently, \mathrm{EXPH} = \mathrm{ATIMEALT}(2^{n^{O(1)}},O(1)).
We have \mathrm{EH}\subseteq\mathrm{EXPH}\subseteq\mathrm{EXPSPACE}\subseteq2\text{-}\mathrm{EXPTIME} (in Papadimitrou’s notation; more commonly, 2-EXPTIME is denoted EEXP), so these hierarchies are much smaller than what this article defines. The so-called “strong exponential hierarchy” is yet something different, and I’ve only encountered it in the Hemachandra paper which shows that it collapses (and which, incidentally, also defines plain “exponential hierarchy” to stand for EH as above).—Emil J. 14:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the article.—Emil J. 17:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Diane Chambers

message: I'm not sure how to edit this but someone has changed a lot of the names "Diane" to "Rebecca" or "rabecca" and could someone please fix it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.246.19 (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebecca/Diane 

message: Why was excessive content added back? I could not find ways to convince you that adding back that content was a bad idea. Therefore, I created . You can discuss my version in its talk page. --George Ho (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing excessive content that was added back? 

message: Johnny Pez, can you explain this edit? Calling Shapiro a "right-wing culture scold" seems... close to being too biased. --George Ho (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Shapiro the "culture scold"
Talk:Cellular Message Encryption Algorithm

message: I don't know of my own professional knowledge, but I'm not at all sure that CMEA has passed out of use in the US. There are still AMPS system phones in use here and there in the US. Can someone clarify this point? ww 15:22, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Collier's

message: From the article: 'During World War II, when readership reached 2.5 million, Collier's published Jan Karski's "Polish Death Camp," one of the first articles about concentration camps.'  This is an important piece of information, but a specific year would be even better.  Unfortunately, Google doesn't seem to give any leads.  Does anyone have this info available?  --Trevor Burnham 05:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Trevor: I've added that information to the article. Pepso 09:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concentration camp article 
Talk:Adam of Bremen

message: Vinland which is speculated to be Newfoundland, amongst other neighbouring places, depending on who you talk to. Such an account may have inspired John Cabot's mission across the Atlantic Ocean during the Americas' colonial times. That voyage would appear to have traced the former account, which led Cabot to claim Newfoundland for England, establishing the first chartered city in the New_World at St.John's.
This seems a bit off topic of Adam of Bremen. I think this theory belongs more on Newfoundland and/or Vinland. If we have evidence (or a theory in the historical literature) that Cabot read Adam of Bremen and was inspired by it, then we should add this here, of course, but do we? Martijn faassen 16:13, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point.  Lord Kenneð Alansson 16:53, 19 May 2004 (UTC)

text: I'm going to put this under Cabot.  Lord Kenneð Alansson 03:30, 22 May 2004 (UTC)

text: I suppose I had a problem seeing it written as "America".  That sounds like the 1800s way of advertising emigration thereto.  Besides, most people forget about Canada when it says America.  The wording was off, even if the link was correct.  Lord Kenneð Alansson 15:27, 22 May 2004 (UTC)

text: As someone who did most of the recent editing, I am not an Adam of Bremem expert at all. The state of the article was rather messy before I came in though, and I cleaned it up some. I'll help review future changes, but I can't really contribute a lot of new things. Martijn faassen 17:42, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenneth, you added this

message: Why is this individual listed with the "Saints" project? Mannanan51 (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint??? 
Talk:Gas exchange

message: Hi i'm a third year Biology undergraduate planning on editing this page as part of a science communication module on my course. Any suggestions would be really helpful thanks.
 
2001:630:12:1020:E8A4:57CA:7D47:7DAA (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed some dangling stuff without actually cleaning up the rest, which may have still left the article in a weird state but less obvious that it needs help and I apologize for this. MarXidad (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012-01-13 edits by MarXidad

message: e from "ventilation". Should this page discuss ventilation systems or should it have its own article? (Granted, complete information on ventilation systems would warrant a full article, but it might be a while before we get enough.)
--Furrykef 16:27, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ...

message: The article references convection as being responsible for much of the movement of gases in/out of lungs.  Erm, I don't think that's right (just look at the article on convection to see what I mean), but can't think of what's meant instead.  Any ideas anyone?  --Plumbago 13:19, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Convection?

message: The summary states that I only added two new diagrams, but I then inadvertently pressed "enter", before completing the summary. I also changed the name of the section from "In humans" to "In mammals" as everything in that section applies to all the mammals and not just to humans. I also replaced some of the references with anatomical details gleaned from "Gray's Anatomy" which is a much more authoritative source than Tortora et al. I also added the medullary pH and CO2 sensor, which was somehow left out during the earlier editing efforts.
These improvements have now also been made to the Respiratory system#Gas exchanger article.  Cruithne9 (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits on Feb 23, 2017 

message: The use of symbols in some sections is not the norm for use in prose in pages. It is for the use of equations and formulas. See fuller note on Breathing talk page.--Iztwoz (talk) 11:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It actually goes against the guidelines see WP:CHEM Symbols - can someone change these ? --Iztwoz (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Irregular use of symbols

message: I thought that breathing involves essentially adding a C atom to an O2 molecule, thus the sum of partial pressures of O2 + CO2 should be constant. Apparently it's not. So what's my error?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smurfix (talk • contribs) 08:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sum of partial pressures?

message: Hahaha 103.125.177.6 (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 

message: reporting 2001:4454:59B:9600:DE6D:CDFF:FED6:2BBA (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earth and Life Science
Talk:List of operettas

message: Dear Sir, I would like to see listed
some of the italian operettas.
You may go to :Casa Musicale Lombardo
for more informations.
With all my regards,
CARLA
Good idea, Carla.  Please could you add them for us, since you seem to be more familiar with them than we are. -- Derek Ross |  Talk 17:41, 2004 Jul 16 (UTC)
Sometimes, is very hard to translate the names of operettas, if they are orginally in german or hungarian. My english is not very good, and I am not sure, if I should translate them. 
Because of my bad english, I have problem to write the plot to the operettas, eventhough I can lot of them. I can try, but I really welcome some correction of my text. Thank You. Peter
:We have some rules for titles of operas, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera. Briefly, we do not invent English titles for German works unless they are in common use. For East European works, however we do try to use English as long accented names can be impractical in Czech or Hungarian. 
:Kleinzach 16:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian operettas

message: The merger is now completed and this page will become a redirect. - Kleinzach 19:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger completed
Talk:Temple Bar, London

message: Whether or not a dragon would have been more desirable, the animal atop the Memorial simply is a griffin, no mistaking. I've inserted the sculptors' names.--Wetman (talk) 01:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The griffin

message: In the "Present location" section it states that "In March 1938 Theobalds Park was sold by Sir Hedworth Meux to Middlesex County Council, but the Temple Bar Gatehouse was excluded from the sale and retained by the Meux trustees."  the source given for this is the website http://www.thetemplebar.info/theobalds-park.html. I was skeptical about this date as Hedworth Meux died in 1929 as his article confirms. Looking at the source it actually confirms that Meux died in 1929 and mentions an attempted sale by his trustees in 1937. It also would seem to suggest that the property was "disposed of" (which may or may not mean sold) in March 1938, but the sold again in April 1938 to Middlesex Council. It is also not clear from this article that the Temple Bar Gatehouse was excluded from the 1938 sale, only that it was excluded from the proposed 1937 sale. Thus, my reading is that the statement as it stands currently is wrong on more than one count and at odds with the cited source (which in fairness may have been altered since it was originally cited). However I am hesitant to chance as I am still not entirely clear on the sequence of what happened in 1938. Dunarc (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query about 1938 sale statement 

message: I think that the memorial is significant enough to have a page of its' own. Any thoughts. Gusfriend (talk) 11:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for Temple Bar memorial
Talk:Giraffe

message: In reverting my edit, you wrote "oxpeckers are not mentioned in the text, so this is not exactly illustrative".  Oxpeckers are mentioned in para 3 in the section Giraffe#Mortality_and_health. --Tagooty (talk) 11:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So they are. I must be blind. Sorry. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your prompt response! Tagooty (talk) 03:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxpeckers on giraffes 

message: It is the tallest living terrestrial animal (disputed) who claims the largest mammal in the world? 2404:8000:1005:9517:AD8E:59EF:7D75:A399 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: Born a little while ago Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: oops I meant spotless Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Per sources like , the 2 giraffes may deserve a sentence somewhere, or that may be seen as failing WP:PROPORTION for this article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Added something: Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the albino giraffe? 

message: The formatting on the first part of this article has been completely messed up for nearly a week ever since the last edit. Please fix. 2001:14BA:9CBC:4100:49AC:128F:4467:3B7D (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting issue
Talk:Ussuriysk

message: The population is 155,800 people (in 2003) and was 157,759 as of the 2002 census
:That seems way too accurate to be accurate, if you know what I mean. --Deville (Talk) 02:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what you mean.  The Census results, however, were reported with this accuracy, and it is somehow does not feel right to round the official results.  I am going to remove the citationneeded tag.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 03:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census
Talk:Road Apples (album)

message: does not in fact refer to "Road Apples". As one drives through Canada (and of course the US) you are often beset by attractions of dubious nature by the roadside. Fruit stands, historical markers, and giant version mof various objects (Easter Egg, Dinosaur, Prarie Chicken (Sheho), Goose (Wawa), Lobster (Shediac). These are the roadside attractions referred to in the name of the festival name, meaning that the festival is just another thing to stop and look at in Canada. 
Another note: the book of the same name by Tom Robbins contains a plot element that is indeed an attratcion as mentioned above.
Unless there's any objection, I'll remove this reference and change it as appropriate.
Tsylos (talk) 19:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Another Roadside  Attraction"
Talk:John Williams (disambiguation)

message: I have removed "John Williams, (1988-present),Me". "Me" was technically inaccurate, as my name was not John Williams, and I'm not from Orrville. -- Oliver P. 19:04, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Me

message: Does anyone else think that John Williams (composer) should be here, and make this page into John Williams (disambiguation)?  Nearly all the Google results are for the composer. National Parks (talk) 07:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Just spent some time tidying the links to this page.  Currently we have over 250 links to John Williams the composer, less than fifty for the guitarist and just over fifty for this page itself (closer to twenty if you ignore the links from user space and talk pages.  By a large margin the composer John Williams seems to be the most notable.  AlistairMcMillan 19:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll leave this for a week.  If no one disagrees I'll move the pages and fix all the links next weekend.  AlistairMcMillan 19:58, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I just went ahead and added it. Fantumphool (talk) 18:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig/Composer

message: I don't understand why you would have an entire division labeled "People" when there are only one or two other divisions, each with one item. When readers see a name, they know that usually means "people". They don't have to be told. Why not divide by subject like all the other disambig pages on Wikipedia?Vmavanti (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divisions
Talk:Injective hull

message: Not to delete, please.  Charles Matthews 19:36, 19 May 2004 (UTC)

message: Baer's Criterion should be included with applications: that is, the injective hull of a domain is its field of fractions. Also, mention the structure theorem of injective modules over Noetherian (commutative) rings: that is, indecomposable injectives are the injective hull's of R/\mathfrak{p} for \mathfrak{p} a prime ideal. Also, mention how to transfer injective modules between rings from a ring morphism: for \phi: R \to S and I injective in Mod(R) we have \text{Hom}_R(S, I) is an injective S module.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.65.59 (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should a tool for deciding if a module is injective be mentioned in an article about the injective hull?  It's not like its injectivity is in question.  Both topics are better placed at injective module, and in fact they are already covered there. Rschwieb (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baer's Criterion
Talk:Utah War

message: I made a  {multiple issues} temmplate because this artical is mess. I will continue to add more resons why. The first example as started above was the infobox. Also another problem was the  belligerents , I attempted to fix it in this edit.  LuxembourgLover (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is messy 

message: A maintenance template was added to this article including this edit, this edit, and this edit. In my opinion, this template is unneeded & is in error. The infobox issues are outdated & the article itself has C B quality ratings according to the Military history, US/Old West-Utah, and Latter Day Saint movement projects. Of course, the article isn't an "A" or of Featured Article quality but in my opinion it does not deserve a maintenance template/mark of shame either. I am, therefore, removing the template. If other editors disagree or want to discuss my edit, this is the place to do it. Shearonink (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit/s - adding maintenance template
Talk:Joe Johnson (snooker player)

message: The old infobox listed the name as "John Johnson", although neither the text nor the title suggests this is his name. Was that a typo, or is his real name "John", but everyone calls him "Joe"? I used "Joe Johnson" in the new box. Abigail 20:18, May 19, 2004 (UTC)
:My typo, I think. --Auximines 08:00, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?

message: Hello, there appears to be different season formats in the article, would be good to standardise. Uses 2020–01, 2020–2021, 2020/21 and 2020/2021 formats at different points in article - I would go with the 2020–01 format as per football articles, but may be different for snooker. Keith D (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made some edits, so hopefully there is consistency in the body text. The table headings and notes are standard in these articles (which doesn't mean they can't be changed). Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season format
Talk:Robert Ward (composer)

message: There is an article on Ward in American Music in the Fall issue, 1995 (Volume 13, No.3). It is "Robert Ward's Instrumental Music" {pp.333-356}; someone put it online here minus the musical examples and 35 endnotes as well as the appendices. The author, Dr. Daniel Huband, has written informing us of this resource, and that the Grove article on Ward is less than satisfactory; I invited Huband to edit but in the meantime if anyone is up for some cleanup, here's something to work from. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Was just looking at a scanned-in version through JStor actually before you mentioned the cached version (since I was adding a contribution of Ward's to the article on Triple concertos). _Very_ impressed and seconded Schissel | Sound the Note! 05:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another resource
Talk:Celtic Christianity

message: ""Celtic Christianity" has been conceived of with differing levels of specificity: some writers have described a distinct "Celtic Church" uniting the Celtic peoples and distinguishing them from the "Roman" Catholic Church, while others classify it as simply a set of distinctive practices occurring in those areas.[2] Scholars now reject the former notion" - on that basis perhaps use of  or "" should be used in the title, as indicated? Fergananim (talk) 10:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Celtic'/"Celtic" Christianity?

message: User:Snowded, you removed reliably sourced information from the article and replaced it with an uncited sentence. What was removed from the article was cited to publications printed by academic presses (such as Oxford University Press), as well as scholars including Ian Bradley. If you have suggestions on where this content can be better placed, I am open to hearing them; however, this cannot be removed in full. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 20:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I should note that Ian Bradely is heavily cited throughout the rest of the article; therefore an edit summary of "too much opinion in those changes" is not an adequate reason for removing the information. I have added the content elsewhere to the article so as a compromise, I am willing to remove the information from the lede, though I think that something should be said there about the influence of Insular Christianity on the faith as practiced in the British Isles. I look forward to hearing your thoughts. Kind regards, AnupamTalk 20:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to check out WP:BRD, you were bold and you were reverted so next step is to discuss, the onus is on you to justify the changes.  The changes read like synthesis to me but its late at night so I will review in the morning -----Snowded TALK 20:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Snowded, I appreciate your willingness to have a second look at the changes. Given that I've substantially trimmed the sentences in the lede as I suggested in the compromise above, I don't think that there should be any issue now. If there are, I'd be happy to work with you to hammer them out. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 21:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts by User:Snowded
Talk:Arthur–Merlin protocol

message: I just removed the following sentence:
  However, Arthur is not necessarily a BPP verifier as it is not known whether MA is contained in the class  \exists \mathsf{BPP}.
I had two reasonds: first, it is nowhere explained what a BPP verifier is, so this sentence was coming out of the blue a bit. Second, it seems that for Arthur to be a BPP verifier, it suffices that ExistsBPP is contained in MA, which is known to be true. Therefore, the sentence seems to false too. However, without a proper definition of what it means to be a BPP verifier, I cannot be sure (coming back to the first issue), so I've removed the sentence instead of correcting it. Note that ExistsBPP is still mentioned in the 'Properties' section, where the statement seems to be correct.
--Sjcjoosten (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BPP verifier? 

message: Could someone please put examples of natural problems in MA?  Note that non-specialists may look at this page, ones who are a bit shaky on the background necessary to be sure they understand just from looking at definitions
67.189.144.253 (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example?
Talk:Sir George Grey, 2nd Baronet

message: Wouldn't Sir George Grey, 2nd Baronet be a nicer title to disambig this article? Proteus (Talk) 21:19, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled