lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Speckled moray

message: This article describes Gymnothorax obesus and uses “Speckled moray” as common name, in the http://fishbase.org/ website Gymnothorax dovii appears as “Speckled moray”, and Gymnothorax obesus as “Griffin's moray”. Two different species presented here as the same. --Loupeter (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any evidence Gymnothorax obesus is commonly called the "Speckled moray"? If not, we ought to request a page move to "Griffin's moray".  The Parting Glass (talk) 16:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirect 

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Swollen-headed conger eel

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Yellow moray

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Inland silverside

message: I'm not sure what to replace it with, but something needs fixing in "the silversides' introduction on California ecosystems not been much studied.", particularly "not been much". Maybe "the silverside's introduction to California's ecosystems has not yet been sufficiently studied."? 63.152.17.32 (talk) 02:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward word choice
Talk:Rainbowfish

message: Editor 70.182.190.203 has changed the common name for the entry on this page for this species to "salmon red rainbowfish", claiming that fishbase is wrong naming the species "red rainbbowfish".  However I note that Dr Gerald R. Allen & Norbet J. Cross in Rainbowfishes of Australia and Papua New Guinea, 1982, Angus & Robertson Publishers, Sydney,  use the name "red rainbowfish".  Given that Dr Allen is probably the greatest living expert on rainbowfish and that he agrees with Fishbase (actually it is the other way around since this book predates Fishbase by a significant amount), and also that there is no such thing as an "official" common name for fish assigned by the original scientist toi describe the species or not, that the name "salmon-red" rainbowfish appears to be mainly confined to the aquarist community, and additionally that the species article is titled "red rainbowfish" (it does mention the alternative name in the first paragraph), so given all that, I think it appropriate that the name "red rainbowfish" be used on this page.  I have changed the list entry back to its previous state. Nick Thorne talk 12:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Glossolepsis incisus'' common name
Talk:Black lizardfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Anotopterus nikparini

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 20:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Feeler fish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Wellingborough Town F.C.

message: Text has been copied from the club website (give-away was the mis-spelling of "San Siro").  I might have a go at re-editing it later but I don't have time at the moment..... ChrisTheDude 07:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-edit 

message: Surely it was founded in 2004 hence the name?
: Correct, I've updated the reference where it read 2005.  On a related note I've altered the year found in the panel from 1867 to 2004.  Though there are some references to the original club being the sixth oldest the official UCL handbook for season 2007/08 clearly states that 'Wellingborough Town 2004' was founded in 2004.  As the article is primarily for the current website the details in the infobox should reflect the current club rather than the original one which folded. Brollachan 17:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case shouldn't all the details of the old club's history be removed from this article?  Maybe a separate page on Wellingborough Town should be started....? ChrisTheDude 08:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's probably best to keep the articles together as the two clubs are connected.  The old/original club information acts as a background to the current club's existence.  With the sections being clearly separated via headers I don't think there is any confusion.  Also I suspect splitting the articles would result in two stub articles, with quite a bit of overlapping/repeating of content. Brollachan 12:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of formation 
Talk:Ipnopidae

message: I've seen an image of a juvenile tripod fish called the "rainbow tripod fish". This name is only ever used to refer to the juveniles and I can't find any research connecting the rainbow tripod fish to a specific species of adult tripod fish. The Wikipedia page for "Bathypterois grallator" comes up in searches but the page itself doesn't recognize this nickname or the juvenile form. The most popular image that is being spread around is from Frida Yolotzin, a deep-sea photographer in Mexico. Is anyone able to identify the rainbow tripod fish and add it to the page of its corresponding species? Is it possible that rainbow tripod fish is a translation from a Spanish common name? 
https://www.earthtouchnews.com/oceans/oceans/this-baby-rainbow-tripod-fish-is-exactly-as-crazy-as-its-name-sounds-and-then-some/ SmallDayDreamer (talk) 18:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rainbow Tripod Fish/information on juvenile tripod fish
Talk:Lancetfish

message: Whoever put the merge request here...I'd say go for it.  Notice that the Lancetfish page does not have the links to the species.  Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Sabertooth fish

message: Eh, too bad they aren't studied much; it sounds like a great fish to study. Does anyone have some info to add on what the benefits are of not having scales? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.79.186.10 (talk) 14:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: — Assignment last updated by Abrahard (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Deep Sea Biology

message: Just to be consistent with the formatting I would take out the "with" in the parenthesis specifying the dorsal fin rays. I like the addition of the hyperlinks for terms such as "pectoral fins" and "spineless". Since the mesopelagic zone is 200m-1000m and the zones mentioned for the larvae is 50m-100m, I would change the wording of that sentence. Overall, the edits were great in specifying existing information on the page and hyperlinking certain terms to reduce confusion.  Aliceli23 (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, thank you for the peer review! Cp31201 (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review  

message: I assigned myself the Sabertooth fish article for peer review and looked at the two versions the group working on this page created. The additions to the article were insightful and helpful toward a better understanding of the organism. Also, hyperlinking words that were not previously hyperlinked helps readers to better understand the text without requiring specific knowledge about the deep sea or, specifically, the sabertooth fish. I would suggest trying to find articles that can support the contributions to this page, such as citing an article that states similar findings to the range of depths in which sabertooth larvae and adults live. I suggest trying and finding more sources to add to the page, but overall all the additions look great. ZachRumley (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding to this peer review, I think the additions made are well thought out and organized. If there is any change I would make, I would say to add more specific information from the sources the group found. For example, when talking about the difference in anal fin ray counts, I would give specific numbers/ranges for each ocean mentioned. The edits to the description about the anatomy of the Sabertooth was particularly well done. Kgb dsb (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, thank you for the peer review! Cp31201 (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Scopelosaurus ahlstromi

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bathypterois grallator

message: The page claims that self-fertilizing would produce offspring with the same genetic material.  There's no mention of this in the reference cited, and it's genetically a fallacy: the offspring would not be identical to the parent if they were made via sexual recombination.  LostBurner 23:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

message: dear sir?ma'am iwANT TO KNOW WHAT A TRIPOD FISH EATS                                                                                    WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, jENNA pIMENTEL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.215.26.215 (talk) 00:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does it eat 

message: I'd add one of those headers to the article page, but I don't know how. Could someone with the experience to do so please do that, and ideally find some sources as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toepoaster (talk • contribs) 21:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article Lacks Citations
Talk:Bombay duck

message: Is any one aware that the dish "bombay Duck" is actually prepared with a "lizard Fish"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.143.42 (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The opening lines of this article imply that it is a duck.  The rest of the article implies that it is a fish.  So...?  Which is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.66.8 (talk) 18:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duck or Fish? 

message: wanna sale dry fish.
contact person Johny 9870186484  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.73.161.210 (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  wanna sale dry fish 

message: Shouldn't this be called "Mumbai Duck"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I hate that in the internet age with every(?) old written article being typed-up, that etymologies are still uncertain.
Daak means mail.
I suggest that the absence of a Bombay rail until 1853, does not deny the use of the word daak as a source. Bombay probably had vehicles that carried mail and fish in 1815.
On the other hand… the use of “mail” for fish is stupid… unless it (the fish) already had a similar sounding name (bombil tak?), that got over-taken. 
MBG02 (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Damon Bruce

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That Bruce succeeded Krueger in the aftermath of Krueger's widely publicized and controversial firing is certainly relevant to this entry. Even if much more time were to pass and Bruce were to become a nationally known broadcaster, so that any reference to KNBR would be of mere historical significance, a note about Krueger in such reference would still be relevant.--Leftymn 21:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: All of the "caller lists" and "sayings" and other parts of Damon Bruce's show have no references and should not be there unless there is a verifiable source for them. Electricbassguy (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research 

message: Damon is a very popular host on a  50,000 watt  station. He can be heard very far from the Bay Area at night.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by D1291 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't Delete
Talk:List of King George V Playing Fields in Berkshire

message: The list of fields is complete.  However the content can always be improved Fiddle Faddle 07:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The map does show a "Recn Gd" at . But the village school in the background of this image is pretty good evidence. Can anyone with local knowledge confirm? — RHaworth  13:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winkfield
Category talk:American judges

message: We need to sort the pages in this category into their appropiate state or federal positions.  I added the  template to get some attention.  I've been working at it, but it's long, tedious work.  Other help would be nice.  Thanks, zappa.jake (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will assist with this matter. --ZsinjTalk 14:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Currently up for CfD after being repopulated into :Category:Hawaii judges. --ZsinjTalk 15:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category Sorting

message: FYI, I moved all of the state specific judge categories plus DC & Guam into :Category:American judges by state.  That way they're not all mixed up with other categories regarding federal judges and such.  Hopefully that will make it easier to find a specific subcategory here. Dugwiki 22:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved state judges into [[:Category:American judges by state]]

message: Are American judges always lawyers? In Canada for example, some judges of the "less important" courts such as small claims did not have law degrees. I also wonder about judges in earlier times. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't think of a single American judge offhand who wasn't a lawyer. In earlier times, one did not need a degree to practice law (see reading law). bd2412 T 20:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

text: * Mostly yes.  Although it's not usually a technical requirement of the job, I think it's so common that it's okay to include it as a subcategory, if that's the point of this question. (What is the point of this question?) --Lquilter (talk) 23:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  (and thanks to User: BD2412 )       Yes, you are correct,. this is the point of this question. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

text: This category is not only for today's judges, is it?  So should it have :Category:American lawyers as a parent? Also you said there is no requirement for supreme court judges to be lawyers - so should  your revert   not be reverted? XOttawahitech (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: When its upwards of 99%, its time to say "what's the deal?" It isn't like a coincidental quality. There is a reason why judges are almost all lawyers. In the rare instances in which, even historically, an appointed judge wasn't a lawyer, they were still practicing law in a real sense. Greg Bard (talk) 14:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are American judges always lawyers?
Talk:Needlefish

message: This article is quite interesting and shows the latest (spectacular) incident: Needle fish article BBC --46.114.37.37 (talk) 04:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd argue for inclusion if the photo could be cleared. As a public service. O0drogue0o (talk) 14:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest incident