lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Storm Front (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: I mean, I realize this isn't really the place to discuss it, but DANG IT, Time Travel, mean-looking aliens, Nazi's invading the United States, and something that looks vaguely reminiscient of a cross between a Large Hadron Collider and a Water Turbine, all in an hour and a half. 66.215.20.28 (talk) 06:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did anyone else really enjoy snickering at this EP? 

message: There were a lot of snipits in the background where the timeline is being restored.  I identified as many as I could, but am sure there are some that I missed.  Can anybody identify the ones that I missed?  Mushrom (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of Timeline 

message: Aint It Cool News summarized some reviews of this episode from various publications, EW, USAToday, TV Guide etc.  Unfortunately I haven't yet been able to find links or archive copies of the original reviews that I can use as references. Knowing that they exist, maybe someone else will have more luck finding them. -- 109.79.87.75 (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Minefield (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: Dominic Keating mentioned the episode in an interview with Sci-Fi Talk I'll try and come back later and use it to add Production details. -- 109.79.65.11 (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. As I read more about the making of this show it is clear the cast all hated wearing the EV suits. -- 109.79.169.92 (talk) 23:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Alexander Courage

message: The dig at Gene Roddenbery really belongs in Gene's article. But of course, it would never survive there!
--- Anonymous
:Yes, I agree - this is no place for bald statements slamming people like Mr. Roddenberry.
:I have changed it using words like "supposedly". Also, nobody but a mind-reader knows how Mr. Courage and Mr. Roddenberry felt or thought about each other. In one way of looking at it, they both owed each other a lot of respect for what they did for each other. They both benefitted a lot.
:I don't know what exactly you are referring to, or when you had this discussion (since you did not sign your comments), but if a reputable source describes a notable disagreement between two notable people, then it is appropriate to include it in either of their articles. Primogen (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: According to this bio he was born in 1919 during WW1 which ended 1918. Did anyone extend this war without telling me?
--194.231.42.82 (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange bio 

message: I created a new section named "Star Trek" theme and moved all the relevant "Career" information to it, since Courage is primarily known for writing the Star Trek theme. Primogen (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek theme section 

message: Although Courage served in the United States Army Air Forces during the World War II era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served overseas in a war zone during the war. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of World War II was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:The Council (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: I enter "The Council" thinking that it would take me to either the European Council, or the Council of European Affairs, and instead I end up on a Star Trek episode. Wikipedia has officially been conquered by dorks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.164.209.228 (talk) 22:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note to say this has been rectified. The Council now leads to a dab page. Miyagawa (talk) 09:33, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously? 
Talk:Phlox (Star Trek)

message: --Greasysteve13 06:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The same reason Captain Jonathan Archer's article is called Jonathan Archer and Odo's article is not named Constable Odo. Phlox is his name. -Ageekgal (talk) 00:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't this article just called [[Dr. Phlox]]? 

message: Should we mention the similarity to Doctor Zoidberg?
Yes okay but I do have a question for you how long is Dr flox's normal sleep cycle he mentions hibernation BigMike90 (talk) 08:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoidberg 

message: ' Denobulans are typically highly social: when confronted with loneliness, his people can sometimes create incredibly realistic hallucinations' I just checked it, the hallucintions were due to a radiation (the reason phlox was alone), not to lonelyness.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.120.133.234 (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  forgot the radiation? 

message: Hello, dear people, could someone with the knowledge how to do that transform the directlink in the first sentence of "Reception" into a footnote-link?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3032:403:10:2:1:BA22:788 (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directlink
Talk:Viking Range

message: They aren't professional kitchen appliances if they're for home use, are they? That and expressions like "originated the "professional" segment" and "premium appliances" don't seem neutral to me. Section two mentions that there were "some major flaws in the design of commercial appliances with respect to their installation in a residential kitchen", that "these flaws [...] made them impractical and undesirable for use in the home" and finally that the founder of Viking Range somehow fixed it all. What were these flaws? And if their appliances were undesirable for use in the home, what were people cooking on? The section reads like a tribute to Viking Range, and seems to say that Viking Range saved the world from the worthless appliances that are non-viking.
I feel an NPOV-challenge might be in order, but I don't care enough to do it. 85.194.50.194 04:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In looking at the pageview analysis, there is a 3-fold spike in pageviews during August and September 2017, which tapers to 2-fold in October 2017.  Unclear what the cause it, but it's there.  See https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2015-07&end=2018-08&pages=Viking_Range for the graphical view showing the spike. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spike in page views noted in Aug-Oct 2017
Talk:Expletive infixation

message: it is an example of tmesis rather than infixation, since true infixes are bound morphemes.
                               fgu jn  j ~
I'm glad this isn't a dictionary and I can just click on those words without having to spend all day looking for them in the dictionary. Nice confusing sentence ;p Morhange 23:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  So at which point can a better example than unbefuckinglievable be inserted without the danger of immediate reversion by reactionary forces? 

message: I have removed the "Examples" section entirely.  My reasons for doing so are these:
1) It was essentially a random list of trivia, strongly discouraged in Wikipedia.  The fact that some of the examples had citations does not make them any less trivial.
2) The examples listed were phenomenally redundant.
3) The main body of the article already contains several examples, as it should.
MarritzN (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing "Examples" Section

message: If the infex had to come between morphemes, wouldn't we expect ab-fucking-solutely or absolute-fucking-ly? 96.255.9.115 (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in this case, the word "fucking" is inserted before the syllable with the primary stress. This occurs regularly. However, there are counterexamples, as listed in the article. At any rate, the inserted word should not break the prosodic feet up: irre-fucking-sponsible, not ir-fucking-responsible. 2A02:AB04:2AB:700:209F:14D3:D5E6:B369 (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't abso-fucking-lutely a counterexample to the morpheme theory?
Talk:Frank Foley

message: Has Israel accorded Foley the status of a Righteous Among the Nations? 86.139.159.146 23:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The plaque in Stourbridge states that he has as of October 1999  Average Earthman 08:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding that! 86.136.1.31 21:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Righteous Among the Nations 

message: The article mentions that the "his escape from Germany was noted by...." - what escape from Germany was that?2A02:C7D:B47A:C900:393E:4C2E:7E9E:3505 (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What escape from Germany?
Template talk:User wikija

message: This template *only* works correctly if your username is the *same* on both the :en: and :ja: Wikipedias.  If your username is different, use Template:User wikija-name.  
To use the template, simply copy the below to your user page:
 
For details on using userboxes, see Wikipedia:Userboxes.
Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 23:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage
Talk:Telepathy (Star Trek)

message: Ill say this, ive seen nearly every episode of trek since TNG started, and ive never heard this explanation. What is the source of this information and should it be presented as cannon? Carterhawk 08:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation 

message: I would like to ask the individual who suggested and tagged this article for deletion to provide an explanation as to why this article should be deleted. While I hold no interest in this article, I just feel it would be unfair to propose an article for deletion and not give any reason as to why. I believe I understand why as this article seems to be primarily the make up of Original Research but in all fairness, an explanation would probably be appropriate. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 14:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Copy and paste from the bold text in the prod tag: articles does not have "any third-party sources to substantiate a claim of real-world notability". --EEMIV (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion (2008) 

message: Continuing to lack an assertion of real-world notability, I've redirected this piece of window dressing and texture to the appropriate article. I also merged the real-world "explanation" for how telepathy in Trek works. --EEMIV (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Hirogen

message: :Image:200px-Hirogen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:200px-Hirogen.jpg
Talk:The Six Swans

message: I replaced the detailed story with a summarized version, and added a link to a modern re-telling. Can the rewrite tags be removed now? Lunapuella 23:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:User wikija-name

message: If your username is the *same* on both the :en: and :ja: Wikipedias, use Template:User wikija instead. 
To use the template, simply copy the below to your user page:
 
For details on using userboxes, see Wikipedia:Userboxes.
Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 23:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage
Talk:List of Star Trek: The Animated Series episodes

message: There is an ongoing poll and Request for Comment at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#RfC Episode Article Naming conventions which has direct relevance to how to title the Star Trek episode articles, meaning that based on how this poll comes out, many Star Trek episodes may get moved around. All interested editors are therefore strongly encouraged to participate, to ensure that your wishes are incorporated into the consensus process. --Elonka 22:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions poll

message: A Request Move affecting the naming of articles in this list is currently being conducted here. All opinions are welcome. --`/aksha 10:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request Move

message: Was it cancelled?
:Yes, the show was cancelled. Aatrek (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why has season 2 so few episodes?

message: I've reworked the page to include writers and directors, as well as reworking the column ordering, just like I've done on List of Star Trek: The Original Series episodes. I based my changes on the featured list, List of 30 Rock Episodes. I also rewrote the entire page header, added in DVD release info (along with a picture of the Region 1 DVD set). Comments would be appreciated. Aatrek (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, bit late, but yeah, looks good. Alastairward (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting the Listings

message: With the DVD collection I have noticed that the episodes are arranged by original air date but the actual episode (production) numbers are not organized (22004, 22003, 22007, 22006, 22001, ...).  Is this an indication that they were aired out of order like the original series was? --RedKnight (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air order vs viewing order
Talk:William Ruschenberger

message: Why should the topic be deleted because source material is copied from an 1855 book of mine when on Wikipedia there is a LOT of "source material" from a NEWER 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica ?
--Maury 23:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the 1911 Encyclopedia was an encyclopedia. Other source material belongs in Wikisource. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files. Furthermore the connection to the name of the article is tennuous. If you want to write an article about a man named Ruschenberger then by all means please do so. This appears to be random text from an old book.  -Will Beback 05:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dr. Ruschenberger was important in the history of Siam. --Pawyilee (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portals
Talk:Katherine Pulaski

message: Diana Muldaur also played a marooned shipwreck survivor on an early TNG episode... as the Enterprise races to rescue her, she is 'kept company' by the bridge crew in shifts... her conversations with Picard are memorable.
When the Enterprise reaches the planet, just within the window for her survival,they find... dust. A time warp had enabled them to establish a link with a woman who had lived, and died, a hundred years before.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.141.173.129 (talk) 04:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems rather odd to stress that Muldaur asked for the character's name to be changed to Kate (actually mentioned twice) without telling us what the name was originally meant to be. --Khajidha (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd add it if I could source it to something reliable. Miyagawa (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I see this has previously been brought up.  I've therefore removed the anecdote from the lead.  It's not very important and is really just a quip. Viriditas (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name changed to Kate 

message: As if it's done by someone patting himself on the back because he's saying nice things about a character who is generally disliked by Star Trek fans (gee what a hero 🙄) More negative criticism of the character, of which there's ample, is in order here.Alialiac (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception and Commentary section lacks criticism of character 

message: The Outrageous Okona
Q Who Goojrr (talk) 03:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Next Generation absences
Talk:B'Elanna Torres

message: In section Starfleet Academy and Maquis, it stay she joined 4 year after 2368 which made her 23 years old. I am not sure how User:94.3.185.11 get year 2070.. --RayYung (talk) 20:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  B'Elanna's age when joined Maquis 

message: In the dialogue of the episode, Torres and Chakotay are both given a provisional rank while Paris was field commissioned to Lieutenant, junior grade. They even wore different insignia. I move for keeping the line "she was given provisional rank of Lieutenant". Also see Starfleet ranks and insignia --RayYung (talk) 13:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Field commissions (more commonly known as brevets) are temporary promotions given to commissioned officers. As the Maquis were not commissioned officers to begin with but ex-Starfleet/non-Starfleet altogether, provisional makes more sense. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 14:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are clearly not field commissions; Riker in "The Best of Both Worlds" was field-promoted to Captain and wore full Captain's pips, and as noted Paris was also field-promoted and wore the appropriate pips.  Only the Maquis officers wore the unique rank insignia, thus indicating that their commissions were not standard field commissions.  Whether they were ever called "provisional" ranks in official sources is unknown to me.  Powers T 14:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

text: The answer to your last question is simple -- because the commissions the two officers received were not the same type.  Powers T 17:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, but of the very mildest possible sort.  =)  Powers T 01:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provisional Rank 

message: I notice that some of the phrasing in this article lacks impartial tone, and inflects opinion, reducing its quality as an encyclopaedic entry. I'd argue that this goes against the Wikipedia guidelines regarding neutral points of view.
Example:
:B'Elanna has a near-death experience and travels to Grethor, the Klingon Hell, where she meets her mother, Miral, and discovers that because of the dishonor B'Elanna has caused her family, her mother would spend eternity in Grethor. The episode not only explores some fascinating aspects of B'Elanna's character, but it also gives further insight into Klingon mythology.
Use of the word 'fascinating' is a term of opinion, and not suitable towards an encyclopaedic material. I would change this myself, however I admit that I am far from a big enough trekkie to make an informed edit. Anybody care to step in?
Rohaq (talk) 21:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased language issues 

message: Unforgettable 
Living Witness
Riddles
Body and Soul Goojrr (talk) 05:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voyager absences
Talk:Neelix

message: This article needs to conform to: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)
As written, the article presents fiction as reality. - Davodd 16:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it could use some facts like who invented the character, and why, and why the character is important to enough to be in the encyclopedia. Also information on the character development over time would be valuable. The Five Ws would add value. --BrianFennell (talk) 19:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute

message: This paragraph:
:While Kes and Neelix are involved in a romantic relationship when they come aboard Voyager. While under the control of an alien rebel, Kes decides to terminate her relationship with Neelix. Even after her restoration however, Kes does not choose to continue seeing Neelix although their break-up is never shown on-screen but the two remained good friends, however.
...has a number of problems.  It does not use proper English. It would require knowledge of the fictional events to fix it. --BrianFennell (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: However, this is not English, but awkwardly written

message: Removed the cat since Neelix is 100% talaxian. --Plasmarelais (talk) 12:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He's only 87,5%. --78.53.98.161 (talk) 22:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Star Trek hybrids

message: How bout the musician Neelix? Should be a ambig. ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.108.94.42 (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neelix (psytrance music)

message: Eye of the Needle
Emanations 
Heroes and Demons
Non Sequitur
Retrospect 
Renaissance Man Goojrr (talk) 05:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voyager absences
Talk:Chuck Fleetwood-Smith

message: *He was left arm bowler many say the greatest left arm spinner, O`Reily said the most talented he saw he claims the ball Smith bowled Hammond with was the best ball he saw. He was surpringly sucsessfull in first class games his strike rate of 42 is better than O`Reily and Grimmets.In the 1934 Ashes series Australia were down 2-0 but Bradmon and Mccabe with the bat  and Smith and O`Reily with the ball Australia managed a 3-2 win of the series, the fact  Smith missed the first two games helps one undersand how we won the series as we did not have his advantage in the first two tests, Smith took 19 wickets in three tests
Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 23:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, that section deserved to be struck, not least for getting the year of the Ashes series wrong! Also, it wasn't merely the return of F-S but some appalling luck with the weather (and injuries) that lost MCC that series - at 2-0 up and with Australia about 180-7 in the first innings of the Third Test, the Ashes were all but on the boat home before rain intervened.Captain Pedant 12:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This is the removed section

message: I'm about 95% confident that Fleetwood-Smith started out as a right-arm bowler and had to learn all over again as a left-armer, a very strange circumstance that ought to be documented.Captain Pedant 12:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've referred to this as reference on Page 270 of The Wisden Book of Obituaries, quoted presumably from Wisden 1972. I've still to work out how to do one of those reference tags, so if anyone else knows how..... WillE 11:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

text: How do you definitely know which sources are true and which are porky pies? It's tempting to ask for citations for all the references to Chuck in Williams' 2000 book - it is, after all written 28 years after Chuck died, and 70 after he came to fame. WillE (talk) 22:19, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unusual trivia

message: While I have nominated this article, it was substantially written by a editor who has now retired. I feel this article is worthy of listing as a good article and have therefore nominated it. I have access to most of the sources used and a familiarity with the topic and as such should be able to address most concerns likely to be raised. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to the GA reviewer
Talk:Willie Park Sr.

message: Note for Americans. This is the correct form. Please do not move to "Sr". Thank you. Osomec 23:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  That's exactly what I hoped this discussion was.  Rlquall 02:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Could someone PLEASE tell his accomplishements in golf? Highly appreciated.Poke mudkip 23:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Arcticle