lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:T-Rex (vehicle)

message: I am currently working on rewriting the content of this page.
:Thanks. As its now original content, I've removed the deletion tag. Oldelpaso 18:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just noticed there's a much fuller page at: T-Rex (automobile) - propose merge this one into the larger page - but no time today to attach proposed merger tags. - Ballista 05:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now inserted proper proposed merge tag - Ballista 04:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:Chiropractic Skepticism

message: One of the editors on the Chirotalk deletion discussion suggested that a new page be created specifically oriented towards groups that are opposed to chiropractic because they are under-represented on the Chiropractic page.  If these groups could be listed on that page this might be a viable suggestion, otherwise they aren't going to get enough coverage.Abotnick 18:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge - Chirobase is already mentioned on the Quackwatch article, as it is part of Stephen Barrett's website arena. It also has a link/reference on the main Chiropractic page because it is providing encyclopedia information. As for the others (your site and the Quack Files), I don't think they are notable enough to have their own articles. I understand that you have a POV about chiropractic, but instead of trying to get links to your site and your colleagues' sites, why not keep on editing the main Chiropractic article with us? That is where your POV will get the most exposure. I am assuming that is one of your main goals and not merely trying to get a link to your forum. Levine2112 19:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge - seems like a fairly classic POV fork (at least in effect; I'm not commenting on creator's intentions) - Jim Butler 07:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge - There's not much substance to this page, I'm sure the points he wants to make can be added to the chiropractic page, minus the links to his website.--Hughgr 17:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: On Chirowatch, it is in the sentence which begins: The site is part of a network of related sites... On Chiropractic, it is reference #13 The Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic Portland, Oregon.
----
I checked the chiropractic article and chirobase.org is not listed. Abotnick 03:01, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

text: It is in the Reference section. Reference #13.. Palmer DD (1910) The Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic Portland, Oregon: Portland Printing House Company [8] The #8 is a link to a referential page on the Chirobase site. Levine2112 03:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jagdgeschwader 77

message: A fine start, but the intro needs to be expanded with at least one more sentence. What's notable about this wing? What does its name or emblem symbolize? LordAmeth 18:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: Other Luftwaffe fighter wings on Wikipedia list the unit's total victory claims--a figure oddly lacking here. Apparently some German sources refer to 5,000 or so Abschusse.  Somebody must have an accurate figure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.218.122 (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No victory total

message: Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Iron Man's armor

message: I will be deleting the entire Television section in approximately one week unless sufficient reliable secondary sources are added to it. It has been waiting for a single reliable source for over 7 years. This entire section, as well as most of the article, is nothing more than a fandom. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Dylanvt (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television deletion 

message: Okay, I've had a bit of a crack at finding a balance here. This isn't really my area, but there we go. It's still very, very primary-heavy; there are probably a ton of other sources out there but I've not the interest to snaffle them all up. The collapsible table seems a fair compromise for listing most of the armours (sorry if any u's have sneaked into the article, that was the hardest part); it's hovering on fancruft in places but hopefully it will draw the venom somewhat. Obviously it's still very ramshackle but only because I've not put any effort in beyond reorganisation; again, I can't believe it's all that hard to find interviews with artists and writers around the major redesigns to balance out the creation section. The hope is to direct energies to what needs pepping up for those interested. The fictional section also needs work and I don't really have the working knowledge to do so; however, it will need to be considerably focused on specific storylines regarding designing armours and the ilk rather than a list of what every single armour did in every single fight, otherwise it's just another Iron Man bio. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 20:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also not sure who needs to hear this but if you're writing a fictional section you don't write "In the Siege storyline" because that's not fictional. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 20:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial clean-up
Talk:Paschal Beverly Randolph

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 07:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: His biography is clear that he was NOT African American. SO what's going on here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.174.71 (talk) 11:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation please? --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  African America? 

message: I recently came across Lucus County Probate Court records. Based of these, which I cited in the article, I have entered a possible new age for Randolph and also that the assessor in the Probate Records 1:254 list the death as accidental. Sorry, I previously put suicide. I also have the plot number of Randolph's unmarked grave in Forest Cemetery (Mulberry Street, Toledo) as Section H, Lot 120, Grave No. 3. The grave was visited to make certain it was unmarked. Royalhistorian (talk) 03:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: If he was of partial Malagasy heritage, why is this not mentioned even a single time in the text of the current version of this article? 76.190.213.189 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malagasy heritage
Talk:Caseros Prison

message: I've removed the panopticon reference until evidence is provided to substantiate the claim that the prison was inspired in the original Benthamite design. Sir Paul 19:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panopticon 

message: Dear wikipedians, there is additional material in the Spanish wikiarticle to expand this one. Will work on it in the next couple weeks; any suggestions on relevant sources and bibliography will be appreciated. Regards, DPdH (talk) 10:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion
Talk:Convenience food

message: Re: Price of TV Dinner. I don't know where the author is buying their TV dinners but I have not seen any that only cost $1 in the US. Sometimes on sale but mostly they are in the $2-3 range in 2006.216.90.56.122 19:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  old discussion 

message: This article is blatantly wrong. Convenience foods can include items such as prepackaged, sliced vegetables, jucie boxes, etc. To claim that they are only un-healthy snacks is POV.
Jeremy (Jerem43 21:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Convenience food is commercially prepared food designed for ease of consumption. Products designated as convenience foods are preprepared food stuffs that can be sold as hot, ready-to-eat dishes; as room temperature, shelf-stable products; or as refrigerated or frozen products that require minimal preparation by the consumer. These products often are sold in portion controlled, single serve packaging designed for portability for "on-the-go" or later eating. Convenience food can include products such as candy; beverages such as sodas, juices and milk; fast food; nuts, fruits and vegetables in fresh or preserved states; processed meats and cheeses; and canned products such as soups and pasta dishes. 
Critics have derided the increasing trend of convenience foods because of numerous issues. Several groups have cited the environmental harm of single serve packaging due to the increased usage of plastics that contributes to solid waste in landfills. Health organizations have spoken out about the high levels of salts, fats and preservatives in these products which critics claim are a contributing factor of the obesity epidemic in western nations.
Jeremy (blah, blah... • I did it!) 20:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New lead

message: It looks like this article deals solely with the U.S. right now so I added a globalize template. I think it would be interesting to explore how non-Western countries such as Japan deal with convenience food or the impact of American-style convenience food on other countries. Japan is particularly interesting because they have the highest amount of vending machines per capita and have a substantially different cuisine from the American one. --Apollo1758 (talk) 19:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other countries 

message: "Convenience foods and restaurants are similar in that they save time.[4] They differ in that restaurant food is ready to eat, whilst convenience food usually requires rudimentary preparation."
i suppose the article means fast food restaurant by "restaurant". fast food restaurants typically sell hot food "prepared" in less than 10 minutes from frozen, preserved, etc convenience foods. a restaurant however is commonly held to be a place where "real" food is prepared from mostly raw ingredients - and therefore associated with the spending of a lot more time and money than either a pack of TV-food or a fast food restaurant. 80.98.79.37 (talk) 09:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  restaurant
Talk:List of vocabulary replacements in Vulgar Latin

message: What an interesting idea for a page.  I do have some questions/gripes, however.  I think the explanation of what this page is intended to illustrate definitely needs to be longer and and more precise.  Also, some of the words taht are "replacements" are really just a changed form of the Latin etymon.  There are many examples, but canere > cantar stood out to me initially.  Cantat is just from the participle (cantus) and cantare existed in Latin (probably in Late Latin, however, but I can't be certain offhand).  Also, Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian should be represented as well.  I really like the Germanic loanwords section.  List of Spanish words of Germanic origin could be very helpful in expanding this section.  I think this page needs to have a more precise and thorough introduction, it nees to have better wikilinking, and it needs to be renamed.  I'm not sure what it should be named, but the current title is long and clumsy.  A table format may also be a good idea. I will work on some of these things today.  This could become a really good page.  I hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes here.--Hraefen 19:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas Cavendish

message: This article states that Cavendish seized the Santa Ana near Acapulco, on the mainland of Mexico.  However, the Christopher and Cosmas article states that the Santa Ana was seized near Cabo San Lucas, which is on the southern tip of Baja California - many hundreds of miles away from Acapulco.  Anybody able to confirm the site of the seizure of the Santa Ana? NorCalHistory 22:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seizure of the Santa Ana 

message: Quote from the main text: "In July 1586, determined to follow Drake by circumnavigating the globe, Cavendish built a larger ship named the Desire. His small fleet set out from Harwich on 27 June 1586 and reached the Strait of Magellan on 6 June 1587. They emerged from the strait into the Pacific on 24 February and sailed up the coast of South America, reaching the southern tip of California in October 1587. Along the way he burned three Spanish towns and thirteen ships and visited the ruins of the failed Spanish settlement of Rey Don Felipe and renamed it Port Famine....
In early November 1587 Cavendish captured the 600-ton Spanish galleon Santa Anna off Cabo San Lucas,... "
I stumble on some inconsistencies:
:(i)Cavendish had a larger ship built in July 1586, then set out in June 1586...
:(ii)Cavendish reached the Strait of Magellan on 6 June 1587 and emerged on the Pacific on 24 February. So that would be 1588, and he could not have been in California in 1587.
:(iii) Along the way - and I am prone to understand that's the way after emerging into the Pacific - Cavendish burned x Spanish towns and y ships and visited the ruins of Rey Don Felipe - Port Famine. But Port Famine is inside the Strait and was visited before emerging into the Pacific.
To my mind this section could be clearer if it is organized as: reached the Strait - visited the Strait including Port Famine - emerged from the Strait into the Pacific, burned x towns etc, and reached California on ../../158?. Sorry I dont have reliable resources to correct the dates. --Lupo Manaro (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trouble with the dates 

message: Other ships of the fleet taken from woodentallships.com, although for citing purposes, a dead tree or more authoritative source is probably warranted, unless someone wants to write to the webmaster for his sources. (If so, remember to still include the website with an op. cit.) -LlywelynII (talk) 14:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Leningrad Codex

message: :Most of the people who like to do "Bible codes" use the letters of the masoretic text, and indeed the Leningrad Codex is a remarkably accurate (but still far from perfect) manuscript of the masoretic text. It is amusing that the "bible codes" people in Jerusalem used the Koren Tanakh, which is a good edition but still far less accurate than others, and certainly less accurate than this codex. Well, no one ever said you need to be a bible scholar to do bible codes... ;-) Dovi 12:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: is this the codex that contains the bible code

message: a part of the book "the Dead Sea Scrolls after forty years" mentions 2500 codices at leningrad? and might be useful in fleshing out this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.14.212.110 (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Might this not refer to the whole collection of Judaica (if that's the word) which came from Abraham Firkovich? The collection, of which the Leningrad Codex is only one small part, runs to over 1000 manuscripts and 18000 items in all according to the Russian National Library. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 14:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  many copies of leningradensis? 

message: "The Aleppo Codex, against which the Leningrad Codex was corrected, is several decades older"
There is no proof for this. There were no older scripts ever found. Please correct the text in the article.
:This is not pseudo-science. It is based on the colophons of the manuscripts and other evidence well known to scholars. Dovi (talk) 18:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudo-science 

message: About:
    The Koren editions of Tanakh are ultimately based on the Leningrad Codex
I believe this has to be qualified, to refer to the Nevi'im and Ketuvim only, but not the Torah of the Koren Tanakh, which is known to very close if not almost identical to Wolf Heidenheim's Torah text. And I also believe it would be difficult if not impossible to posit that Heidenheim in turn based his Torah text on the Leningrad Codex. Toddcs (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koren
Talk:Administrative divisions of Algeria

message: (moved from Talk:Provinces of Algeria) Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wilaya sounds good to me; translating it as "province" sounds odd, although it doesn't contrast with "province" in an Algerian context. - Mustafaa 00:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:The X-Files season 1

message: Why has this been edited and made worse, not to mention completely wrong!
Most of these episode descriptions are wrong.
I fixed some of them, but it still need some fine-tuning
Everything From Young at heart to Born Again, with the exeption of TOOMS is Wrong
:I edited the episode "Tooms" a couple days ago to represent a true synopsis of the episode - will do the rest when I have time... (actually - re: previous comment - Roland is wrong as well) 82.32.201.125 18:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Young at Heart" and "Miracle Man" fixed.... 82.32.201.125 18:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

text: "Darkness Falls" fixed.... Aswc 17:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While deleting some stuff I accidently screwed up the second half of the table. Don't know how to fix this, could anyone assist? Quiddity99 (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Fix!

message: I'm trying to create an article for Miracle Man, but there's a redirect that takes the reader straight to this page. I can't actually get into the page to edit it. Can someone help with this please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euchrid (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Miracle Man redirect
Talk:The Cloisters

message: "In 1933, Rockefeller donated several hundred acres of the New Jersey Palisades clifftops, which he had purchased over several years for the Palisades Interstate Park Commission to preserve the land from further development." Why is this relevant? Was this land across the Hudson even visible from the Cloisters on Manhattan? PRRfan (talk) 15:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The original myth is often used by the Cloisters to say "Rockefeller purchased the land across the river so that the Cloisters had a nice view" It is visible from the Cloisters, which is right along the Hudson River overlooking the Palisades. PalisadesResearch (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind if the sentence is removed, but the original sentence was already incorrect and thought to be connected to the section. Thank you! PalisadesResearch (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks both, much clearer now. Ceoil (talk) 17:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockefeller's Palisades donation
Talk:Nitro Pro

message: Nitro has come a long way since all of the above was written. I'm not an employee or dealer or anything like that; I have nothing to do with the company or its product, nor have any skin its its game. I'm simply both an end-user as well as an IT pro with pushing 40 years experience, and I've checked-out virtually every PDF product out there. In the past... oh... I dunno... I'd say maybe three or so years, Nitro PDF Pro has become a seriously worthy alternative to any full commercial version of Adobe Acrobat, and for a lot less money. And, like Acrobat, Nitro offers a best-of-breed freeware reader which, unlike Adobe's free reader, is capable of creating PDF files...  and by three methods (specifying the file-to-be-made-into-a-PDF in the reader's interface, or dragging-'n-dropping it onto the reader's Windows desktop icon, or by "printing" to a virtual printer driver), to boot! 
After trying the top four logical competitors for about three months each during 2013, I've come to the professional conclusion that Nitro PDF Pro is now the best alternative to pretty much any full version of Adobe Acrobat; and that Nitro's free reader is a far better default PDF reader on a person's Windows machine than is Adobe's free reader. Yes, of course, that's just my opinion, but it's my professional one, informed by nearly four decades of analyzing and reviewing and recommending such products (seriously; I go back to Acrobat version 1.0). I'm not saying Adobe Acrobat or its free reader is sub-standard; they are not: I still love those, too. I'm simply saying that Nitro has apparently been working overtime for the past three or so years to place itself at the unambiguously top of the heap, now, of Acrobat alternatives.
I hate that the article, now, contains misinformation (though I updated/corrected a little about the reader in it, today). I want to see if I can soon fix the problem rightly cited at the top of the article, which chides said article's not having third-party references. That's bad; and I hope to be able to fix that, over time, starting soon. There are plenty of articles and reviews out there, now, about Nitro; so it shouldn't be that hard! [grin]
Gregg L. DesElms (Username: Deselms) (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things have changed 

message: Latest or Stable version of Nitro Pro needs updating to 13.38.1.739, April 6, 2021, as of April 13. Don't know why, but my attempt to do so, per reference #1, failed.24.123.84.22 (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest/ Stable Version
Talk:Plymouth-Banjul Challenge

message: I'm removing the 'auto racing' link found on the text "car rally". It seems inappropriate as it is made quite clear the Plymouth-Dakar is not a race and no recognition is given to whoever arrives first.
This article (if people accept it anyway in terms of notability) does need quite a bit of cleaning up.  Spelling and paragraphing in particular.  Possibly a link in the Banjul page wouldn't go amiss.  Something for a rainy day for someone.Stevebritgimp 16:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dakarchallenge.co.uk/history/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 05:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:James Brolan

message: The listing of this article as an AfD is actually under dispute as its first listing was a WP:Bundle with Paul Douglas (cameraman) that should have been questioned the first time. Were people aware that their votes were a twofer? The second time, however, is it under clear dispute and the nominator has been told that there are clear reasons for not bundling the two individuals.Crtew (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion