lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of hospitals in Ohio

message: You are invited to cleanup List of hospitals in Ohio. This list I did major cleanup, by removing much that didn't belong. It still needs tender loving care, since it still has issues.Catfurball (talk) 22:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I added anchors so that the TOC will work.   Some suggestions:  a summary of the number of hospitals in the intro paragraph would be good (The American Hospital Directory should have a listing of these).  Add some additional information like number of beds and when the hospital was founded.  This will help make this more than just a directory and add substance.  Are there former hospitals of historical not to list in another table.  Are mental hospitals included?  Then, you might put the entire list into a sortable table. It is not a good practice to put links in subheadings because this messes up the linking to the section.   WP:Hospitals 13:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invited
Talk:Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz

message: What is this about the YTV ad campaign, "Endless Waltz has endless waits"? I have never heard of this, and a Google search for the phrase results in nothing but this article. Also, no references are cited anywhere in the article. Ketzer (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header 

message: Wait if Endless Waltz retconned the Original 5 Gundams does that mean the destruction of the original 5 (Wing , Sandrock , Heavy Arms , Shenlong and Deathsycthe) happened and then the Endless Waltz  Versions (Wing Zero Custom , Gundam Altron/Nataku , Deathscythe Hell , Heavyarms Kai and Sandrock Kai) are the upgrades? (similar to how Tallgeese III was mentioned in the Original Series.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.182.9 (talk) 23:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Retcon

message: [i]To date, Super Robot Wars Alpha, in which Endless Waltz debuted, is the only Super Robot Wars installment ever to include both the original series and Endless Waltz.[/i]
This is not true; other games (such as F) have included both -- no game yet has used both the plots of the original series and EW (EW wasn't until Alpha Gaiden).  EW also did not debut in Alpha, it debuted in FF.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.47.247 (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alpha

message: The date listed as September 11, 2000 is incorrect. I first saw Endless Waltz in 2000 before June as I was living in New Brunswick at the time and moved to Newfoundland in June. It had to have been earlier than the quoted September date. I've added a citation needed tag for this reason.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jermerf (talk • contribs) 02:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution in North America
Talk:Rhoda Penmark

message: I have partially reverted  because it combines and confuses the ending of the book and the play with the ending of the 1956 movie. In the book and play, mom dies, daughter lives (a horrifying ending which not only gives the girl the chance to kill again, but also to grow up to have children of her own, thus conjuring up the specter of the genetic evil — the bad seed — being passed on to future generations of killers); whereas in the otherwise–excellent movie mom lives, daughter dies due to the requirements of the Hays Code (and perhaps the greatest single modern example of a deus ex machina ending) with mom so convinced of her own evil nature she can't stand to live, much less have another child. I am going to also change the section heading to make clear that it is the character history from the book. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 14:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie/book confusion 
Talk:North Atlantic Conference

message: If the founding date is 1997, how can Massachusetts College of Pharmacy be a member since 1996? —optikos 02:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding date

message: This is an eye sore that needs to be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peacekeeper 1234 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline
Talk:SS William G. Mather (1925)

message: The last sentence of paragraph 3 reads "In October 1990, she was moved to her permanent berth at the East Ninth Street Pier on Cleveland's North Coast Harbor."  The first sentence in the Current Location section reads "On September 24, 2005, the museum was moved from the East Ninth Street Pier to Dock 32..."
If the ship was moved in 2005, then the 1990 berth isn't really permanent, but rather, "long-term".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheilaej (talk • contribs) 23:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Permanent" berth?
Talk:Tuva or Bust!

message: I don't get it. Did they make it or not? --Spencer (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ralph did. He ran into Simon Winchester while on the trip oddly enough. I did inform Ralph that Flashman at the Charge oddly has Tuvans in it. - Sparky (talk) 08:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eonycteris

message: This looks like it was lifted directly from a field report.  It doesn't appear to be online, but I suspect it's word for word from somewhere.  --Aranae 02:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does look suspicious.  Someone asked the editor (Tabdulla) who submitted this about it, but I don't see a response.  On the other hand, a few of his articles cite papers by an "M.T. Abdullah", so perhaps it is his own work. —Veyklevar 23:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

text: We don't want to delete your contributions.  We like your contributions. We just want you to tell us if you have the rights to publish it here or not, so that we don't get in trouble with copyright law. —Veyklevar 10:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:Sam Aanestad

message: Hi - I have removed some unreferenced information from this article: although the entire article is unreferenced, the information I have removed tends to be the slightly un-necessary information about his interests and early education. Also the opening sentence is confusing: is he primarily notable as a surgeon, or as a senator? At the moment, it suggests it's because he's a surgeon. Animatronic Fruit Loop (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed unreferenced BLP information 

message: I'll just leave this here. __ E L A Q U E A T E 00:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference note for admitted COI 
Talk:List of newspapers in Ohio

message: Why are we including Sun Newspapers among the "major papers" for this state?  -- JeffBillman (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sun newspapers

message: May I suggest the following as a definition of a "major paper" for the purposes of this article:  A single, daily newspaper with circulation of more than 25,000.  There are a few more papers which qualify under this, but not so many as to cause a glut of newspapers. -- JeffBillman (talk) 22:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major papers 

message: On the List of newspapers in the United States, only the "major papers" from Ohio show up due to the formatting of this list. -- Mikehowes 07:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of newspapers in United States
Talk:The Cincinnati Enquirer

message: Hello. The "Facilities" section needs to be updated to reflect the fact that The Enquirer offices are no longer at 312 Elm St. The Enquirer news operation is now a block to the west, on Plum Street. See https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnists/2023/03/01/enquirer-editor-beryl-love-on-office-move-charles-meurer-painting/69953587007/ Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bholtgren (talk • contribs) 16:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Cincinnati Post was conservative, but the Cincinnati Enquirer is downright Nazi. I think a section needs to be added about the Enquirer's right-wing bias and its extreme editorial stance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.147.95 (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right-wing bias 

message: I think a famous/notable Enquirer writers section could be helpful. Jim Borgman already has his own page. 140.103.136.26 (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writers 

message: http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=wapiphone&template=wapiphone
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Iphone pages

message: [Cincinnati.Com is The Enquirer's flagship electronic product<>]
The Enquirer is a bastard child subdomain of cincinnati.com, so that entry is bass ackward.
The Enquirer has never possessed its own URL.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.250.147 (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Enquirer did indeed have its own domain at enquirer.com for a time. I've expanded "Online presence" to discuss the website in detail. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 00:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate
Talk:Vukovar massacre

message: I think you were right to remove the “worst war crimes since WWII up until that point” though I think it meant up to the point in 1991 not all that came after. I too see nonRS cited for such a strong claim so still agree with your edit. Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 05:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Worst” 

message: Hey, can someone please merge Igor Kacic into this article? Lettlerhello • contribs 14:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Igor Kacic
Talk:Does

message: SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH - it's a secret
Tag! You're it!
MONKEYS!
hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.165.90 (talk) 21:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dayton Daily News

message: Don't slander the DDN people, or there ambulance chasing perverted lawyer, Brett Thurman, will take you to court! It's true 65.31.34.169 14:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Reads far too much like promotional press puffery in places-- statements like "Wallace has led significant changes innovating the way news at CMG Ohio is gathered and delivered across the print, broadcast and digital media" - not good. I've tagged the article and I'm going to see about making some edits when I have the chance. ProfessorTofty (talk) 18:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising copy 
Talk:Industrial fermentation

message: equipment of the fermentation of different foods
Have a wikified it enough yet? --Footballexpert 09:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: there should be detail on types of fermentation processes. because thts not enough content herein  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.17.211.43 (talk) 13:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  its types 
Talk:Ford Boss engine

message: This topic should refer to all BOSS engines not just the upcoming one. ie 302 Boss, 351 Boss etcxbgs351@tpg.com.au 04:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the Boss/Hurricane engine which is totally unrelated to any previous Boss engine, including the new FRPP Boss crate engines.  The Boss 429 was part of the 385 engine family, the Boss 351 was a Cleveland V8, and the Boss 302 was a Windsor V8 derivative.  There are already articles on all of these engines and they have no place in this article.  
TheBalance 15:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But... but... but... why do we have an article on this modern engine, not even yet in production and certainly not as notable as previous Boss engines, under "Boss engine"?  If we're going to have an article called "Boss engines" it should include all the Ford Boss engines, the old series and the new ones.  Baron ridiculous (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Topic

message: I think Jeep still owns the trademark to the Hurricane engine name, so I believe this engine will get renamed before production. Hopefully not Duratec. --Sable232 03:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AutoWeek is reporting it'll use the Boss name.  --SFoskett 18:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Future rename

message: Which set of measurements here are correct, the metric or the standard? I fixed the rounding on the standard measurements, assuming that the metric ones were correct. That was reverted, because the standard measurements are apparently the "actual" measurements? --Sable232 15:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard values are obviously the actual measurements: 4.53 in = 115.062mm (115mm), 4.015 in = 101.981mm (102mm), 3.74 in = 94.996mm (95mm), 3.503 = 88.9762 (89mm). TheBalance 14:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, if the engine was designed in standard, those mesurements should be first. I'll change it now. --Sable232 16:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Measurements

message: I added a new cancellation section, to reflect the news from Automotive News and other sources that the Boss (for F150) has been killed. TAPwiki (talk) 23:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed Cancellation section and renamed it "2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor". New information has revealed that the engine is alive and will debut in the SVT Raptor, probably sometime next year.--MN12Fan (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancellation

message: Should we add something about the 5.8L version that was eventually cancelled? 67.176.175.142 (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  other displacements
Talk:Blood, Sweat & Tears (Blood, Sweat & Tears album)

message: Interesting that there's no mention that "Blues - Part II" borrows passages from Cream's "Sunshine of Your Love" and Willie Dixon's "Spoonful," a song also done by Cream. I think this should be added, but given how a source needs to be cited for just about everything, how would one do that?? "Just listen to the track!" is probably not a good enough citation! http://scattered-frog.blogspot.com (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blues - Part II 

message: "Blood, Sweat & Tears (Blood, Sweat & Tears album)"?  Are you kidding me?  Meanwhile, "Blood, Sweat & Tears (album)" redirects to the disambiguation page.  This makes no sense at all to me, but I'm not fixing it! Shocking Blue (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Tachymeter (survey)

message: The two articles Tacheometry and tachymeter contain duplicate information and should probably be merged. --Michael Daly (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - Leonard G. (talk) 18:10, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You agree but the merge tag you added identifies an entirely different pair of articles to be merged.  Tacheometry and tachymeter contain duplicate information.  Tachymeter and tachymetry scale also contain duplicate information.  Which pair should be merged, or should all three? --Michael Daly (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Tacheometry 

message: A previous suggestion to merge with Tacheometry seems to have failed for lack of interest. Information in Tachymeter scale seems to be duplicated here, maybe that article could be merged into the Watches section? At least for a start.... -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 00:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree--PremKudvaTalk 11:25, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Disagree-- Two halves of article are completely unrelated.  Split article into Tachymeter(Surveying) and Tachymeter(Watches).  Create disambiguation page. Twredfish (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Something must be done-- Both views are valid. As it stands now, there is duplicated information, which is not good. I will go ahead with the split, which makes interwiki links more logical. -- Egil (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Tachymeter scale 

message: Just so you know, I don't know how wikipedia links different language articles together but the French link points to "Compte-tours" witch is tachometer and not tachymeter.
Once on the french page "Compte-tours" the english links points rightly to tachometer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.242.11.3 (talk) 13:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the link to fr:Tachéomètre. Is this the right one?  — Mr. Stradivarius (drop me a line) 15:12, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  French page
Talk:The Foundation for the Study of Cycles

message: Article underwent AfD with no consensus- see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Foundation for the Study of Cycles CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 07:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 

message: The name of the organisation is, as far as I can ascertain, Foundation for the Study of Cycles without any the on it. At present the page and redirect are the other way around. Shouldn't this be changed after making sure that I am right? Ray Tomes 12:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  title of page 

message: Following discussion in User:Seraphimblade page it was proposed by User:Rood_Koot that the FSC article be set up in my User space which I have done - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RayTomes/Foundation_for_the_Study_of_Cycles and please note that I have made the name without "The" on the front as I consider that correct. Anyone with an interest in this article should please discuss it in the associated talk page, thanks. Ray Tomes 20:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-establishing FSC pages
Talk:Legal professional privilege

message: There are several compelling reasons to keep this article separate from Attorney-client privilege. Admittedly, principles have the same origin and they are very similar. Nevertheless, each country does have a different take on it. Typically, most commonwealth countries don't diverge much from each other. The US, however, often has its own unique take on many legal principles. I'm not too knowledgable about attorney-client privilege to say whether that is the case but I think there is a good possibility, and if so, we should be open to those differences. The simplest reason why this should be different is because commonwealth countries don't have attorneys. They have solicitors. So for the same reason we don't merge solicitor into attorney, or vice-versa, we shouldn't merge solicitor-client privilege with attorney-client privilege. I see no clear advantage to the use of the word "attorney" in the title for an article that is about solicitors. It will only have an effect of alienating contributors with its unecessary US-centric title. --PullUpYourSocks 03:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate from Attorney-client

message: I have made some structural changes to legal professional privilege, and have left a similar notice on the Attorney-client privilege page. In my view, this page functions as a general overview of the concept. All common law countries (of which the US is one) share the basic features of the concept. Within this page, there is space for a summary of each common law jurisdiction, and scope there to point out any local differences in the concept's treatment.
I have therefore made the search term 'legal professional privilege' redirect to this page, rather than to the specific Attorney-client privilege US page, since there is no particular reason why the US should be picked out as an exemplar for the concept.
I have then included a short summary (I am an English, not an American, lawyer, and so for the moment this is just a cut-and-paste from the Attorney-client privilege article) of the US position in this page here. Could someone who has more knowledge of US law make this a unique and proper summary?
Urbanmyth139 (talk) 11:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural changes
Talk:Hampton Township, New Jersey

message: Please edit, if necessary, the citation for the 
== Name Etymology == section.
.  --A.T. Horsfield 03:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:West Side Market

message: The only supermarket within walking distance of the West Side Market is Dave'e (which itself is really not all that great).  The nearest Tops and Giant Eagles are about 10 minutes by car. Pimlottc 18:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Supermarket boom?

message: -- PRRFAN ALRIGHT - I'M SORRY- I'VE BEEN SEARCHING: BUT CANNOT FIND WHY SOME LINKS ARE PERMITTED TO LIST COMMERCIAL NAME - LIKE CRAINS CLEVELAND BUSINESS PAGE RIGHT ABOVE THIS - ABOUT WSM.  NOT SURE WHY THIS CAN'T LIST THE SPONSOR OF INFORMATION - THE WEBCAM THAT WE ARE PAYING FOR/HOSTING ??  PLEASE JUST REMOVE LINK IF YOU CAN'T CALL IT BY PROPER NAME OR INCLUDE OUR COMPANY NAME JUST LIKE CRAINS CLEVELAND.  THANKS. AND HAVE A GREAT DAY --  11:51, October 11, 2013‎ Pavmaner
:Good question. One answer is that the label "Crains Cleveland" tells the reader something about the linked-to information. It provides a clue about its trustworthiness; for example, you'd presumably want to know before you click a link whether you were going to the New York Times or the Weekly World News. But a livecam is pretty much a livecam; adding a sponsor name to it doesn't tell the reader much, and does run directly afoul of Wikipedia's promotion guidelines. PRRfan (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, by the way, for adding the link to the livecam; the link itself is a good addition to this article. PRRfan (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: Hi our Wiki editors!  First, let me apoligize in advance, as I'm not intimately familiar with policies of Wiki.  I've read documentation, but what I see is different that docs indicate.  In this example, Crains Cleveland Business has page dedicated to West Side Market.  
In the External Links section, it lists "Crains Cleveland Business: Cleveland Landmarks Page".  It's obvious to me, as a reader, Crains Cleveland Business is the source, producer, and sponsor of the attached page.  Listing Crains Cleveland Business does nothing to add contextual value - it only serves to further advertise their business.
I have added a link with our companies West Side Market webcam.  We are the source, producer, and sponsor of the webcam.  I'm not clear on why editors insist on removing some company names but permit other company names in External links and other sections of pages.
Thank you in advance ...and please add InsureCLE or remove our link. 
-PHIL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavmaner (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Phil. Did you see my comment above drawing a distinction between the Crains link and your link? Also, if you'd like to remove the link, feel free to do so (although a) someone else might re-add it as a valuable contribution and b) I would think you'd want the traffic to your site no matter whether your firm's name is on the Wikipedia page.) PRRfan (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising vs Sponsorship Designation
Talk:Cleveland Museum of Natural History

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Cleveland Museum of Natural History:  41.511425, -81.613412
—24.93.181.227 (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed. - Eureka Lott 20:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  CMNH Coordinate error 
Talk:Cleveland Botanical Garden

message: The article has the Ohio structure stub tag at the bottom, but the Cleveland Botanical Garden is not a structure or building.  It has buildings, but most of its gardens are outdoors on a respectable-sized campus.  Does anyone know of a better stub tag for this article? MamaGeek (talk/contrib) 02:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong stub tag