lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Star of Bethlehem

message: There is one star known for navigation. One star that does not move as the others in an east to west arc. This is Polaris. 72.139.200.94 (talk) 22:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only star navigable 

message: The Biblical account mentions shepherds tending their flocks outside - which makes a December date improbable - i.e., June would be much more appropriate. [A fair number of writers have mentioned this point]. --DLMcN (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The shepherds are not mentioned in Matthew (only in Luke). Therefore they likely have not been there at the same time as the wise men. According to Matthew, Herod had all children under the age of two killed. However, this only makes sense if Jesus is no longer a newborn. The wise men therefore only came to Bethlehem some time later. And this could well have taken place in winter. 25 December would then not be the actual date of birth, but the time when Jesus was honoured as king for the first time. CHrist1291 (talk) 09:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shepherds outside > not during winter? 

message: The late Fr. Raymond E. Brown is cited in the article as the author of some source publications. - knoodelhed (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  We have an article on the site about Raymond Brown
Talk:Theo Walcott

message: Which section should feature the celebration of his recent 30th birthday, particularly the joy it brought to fans of Peep Show? Spike 'em (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three-0 Walcott 

message: Unless he played for Manchester United in 15/16 season, he cannot be credited with winning the FA cup 82.21.112.108 (talk) 22:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot and thanks for noticing that error. I can confirm it was added by a user who has been blocked. I have therefore removed that incorrect information without further delay. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: Jacob Walcott is not Theo’s cousin - they are not related at all. I know as I am Theo’s mother… Selkiewife (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information
Talk:Apparatchik

message: аппара́тчик, plural apparatchiki
While this is true that in Russian the plural for this word is as stated above, in English you write "apparatchiks". At least in New York Times they do. --Anthony Ivanoff 16:46, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Plural

message: The "chik" at the end of the word puts it in a diminutive attributal form, somebody playing a small part in a bigger scheme of things.
I commented out this sentence. The suffix -chik in Russian can be indeed a diminutive suffix, but in this case it is just a suffix denoting profession, like -er in English. --Anthony Ivanoff 03:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  -chik = diminutive
Talk:Żubroń

message: "be more durable and less impregnable to disease"
sounds like you want to say less susceptable to disease.
Granite26 20:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this right 

message: When poking aroun on internet find these pages which are same to ourone. But nowhere said, we have a text from wikipedia or here no citations of those pages. Lets compare:
*http://www.messybeast.com/genetics/hybrid-bovines.htm
*http://www.molyworld.net/aa/cross05a.htm
*etc.--Juan de Vojníkov 20:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who brakes copiright 
Talk:Iapetus Ocean

message: Since I doubt Scotland or Scandanavia were ever in the Southern Hemisphere I changed it to Northern.
:Baltica (including Scandinavia) was once near the South Pole, probably even southern than it is north today. During the late Cambrian Earth looked very different (see this wonderful paleogeographic site). During the late Proterozoic, when the supercontinent Rodinia existed, Australia was near the North Pole. Continental plates have really travelled around the world over the many millions of years.--Jyril 19:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern Hemisphere
Talk:Appenzeller cheese

message: I cut the following sentence,
"The cheese is similar to Gruyère in flavour and texture."
although it even came with reference:
[Janet Fletcher (San Francisco Chronicle, October 21, 2004). Raw milk makes this aged Swiss cheese an 'extra' special treat. "Appenzeller resembles Gruyere in texture and flavor, although Appenzeller wheels are smaller, about 20 pounds."]
Sorry, but quoting a US newspaper as authority on Swiss cheese is a bit insulting. Apart from that, it is wrong. Of course, Appenzeller and Gruyere taste somewhat similar, but only insofar as they are both typical examples of traditional hard Swiss cheeses. Simon A. 17:30, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So, they "taste somewhat similar", but saying "The cheese is similar to Gruyère in flavour and texture" is "wrong", and backing it up with a quote from someone who does food journalism for a living is insulting? I am a little confused. Perhaps you should have simply added "somewhat" to the sentence in question. —Bunchofgrapes  (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I would disagree, Gruyere and Appenzell cheeses taste very different. Appenzell is more pungent, particularly the more mature varieties. The comparison is misleading.Jschwa1 11:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

message: In north country of New York State some local games make this Wpow (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch knuckle cheese says it a like this type
Talk:Lamivudine

message: According to GSK's annual report, the patent expires 2010 in US and 2011 in Europe. Unless anyone can find a source for the 2016 date in the article, I'll change it. 203.214.62.109 15:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Patent expiry

message: "GlaxoSmithKline sought to perpetuate the fiction that..." seems rather polemic in tone.  Need to look into the history of that edit. Ccreitz 18:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've uploaded a new structure. Thank you for bringing this up. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Got it. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issue?

message: appears incorrect to me, the base and 5'CH2OH should be on the same side of the ring 155.91.28.231 13:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've uploaded a new structure. Thank you for bringing this up. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Got it. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  structure stereochemistry 

message: "Physical Interaction with Tenofovir DF" was showing up with funny lines i just edited it without changing any content.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.253.212 (talk) 04:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor edit 

message: is there any problem if HBV patient has taken Ziffix 100mg tab twice? And as known its given once daily  . Need urgent helping relply on my mail its (ehabalhkeem@yahoo.com) thanking you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.132.71.152 (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  help 

message: News reports are stating a doctor has successfully treated Ebola patients with Lamivudine Blacknail (talk) 02:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Ebola Virus Disease 

message: Most of this article is unreferenced. For example, the first citation comes about halfway through.Wawawemn (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Ohmmeter

message: How about a circuit symbol?
:Since an ohmmeter is a standalone test instrument and is not used as part of a larger circuit, it does not (as far as I know) have one. 86.159.159.194 (talk) 12:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

message: The multimeter in the second image is not even set to measure resistance, and is thus not currently an ohmmeter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.166.230.210 (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multimeter image 

message: Halo, I am an unregistered user as of now (until I find time to register), but I made some modifications to the article (basically at 3rd and last paragraph) to make it more easily understandable to lay persons (like me). I am no expert and can't add any real new information, I just tried to clarify some points without changing the essence at all. If anyone thinks they should correct anything, please do.
As for the 4th paragraph, quote "A more accurate type of ohmmeter has an electronic circuit that passes a constant current (I) through the resistance, and another circuit that measures the voltage (V) across the resistance. According to the following equation, derived from Ohm's Law, the value of the resistance (R) is given by: R =V/I), it contains some points that need clarification for the non- expert: What's the difference between the ohmmeter described herein and the next paragraph's "precision" ohmmeter? Are they the same or different? At any rate, in both cases the instrument is described to measure voltage, not resistance. How does the current gets measured? Does the instruments involved contain two galvanometers, one to measure current and the other to measure voltage simultaneously, or you measure current first, voltage afterwards and extrapolate resistance? Clarifying these points, though they may be self evident to some, would make this article more easily accessible to people without prior knowledge (like me!)
2A02:587:4511:2200:CDEA:2643:DBE7:52CD (talk) 02:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications needed
Talk:Rotational motion

message: Edited the Angular Acceleration section so that the  tags aren't visible. Dunadan 17:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm going to merge Rotational motion and Rotation around a fixed axis on a temporary talk page: Talk:Rotational_motion/Rotational_motion. I found this mind map of the subject of rotational motion, and in my opinion that's the direction that the structure of the rotational motion articles need to move in. 
Currently Rotational motion doesn't seem like the 'lead-in' article to the subject, and that's what it needs to become. I'm going to start re-writing most of it, and throwing in a few more relevant equations. I think we need to maintain the idea of making that vital comparison with the other forms of motion, but I want to tone it down a bit and stick closer to the subject matter. Iomesus 16:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging and reworking 'Rotational motion'
Talk:Larisa Oleynik

message: I just removed a blurb saying that Oleynik was one of People Magazine's 50 Most Beautiful People in 1997.  She wasn't actually one of the 50.  I assume this was taken from imdb.com, where it says under the trivia section of her bio that she was a leader for some sort of "People" readership poll.  While she is pretty, this sort of poll isn't really notable.  I also removed a sentence that said she was widely regarded as one of the most beautiful people in the world... beyond the poll, this really isn't verifiable and comes off as fan-talk. --NymphadoraTonks 17:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird. I remember when this happened. I never actually saw proof, though. KVenzke 04:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beautiful people 

message: Say, do we even need these here? If we did that for every celeb article, someone like Jennifer Aniston would have hundreds listed. It seems kind of pointless, unless we're citing one as a source. So, I'll move them to discussion for now. Mad Jack 08:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Periodicals

message: After reading through this article, I'm delisting it as a GA for the following reasons:
*The amount of information in the article is rather minimal, I'm sure there's a way to expand the article.
*The amount of references is small as well.
*Virtually all the references give a 404 error (except #s 4 and 8)
If this all can be fixed, then it can be re-nominated at GAN. Wizardman 00:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA reassessment 

message: Did her father died from cancer in 2003 at 67?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.7.184 (talk) 07:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father 

message: I read the note for the birthdate in the Early life and education section, and based on it, WP:DOB and WP:BLPPRIMARY I'm removing the birthdate. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Sokol movement

message: Nolte, Claire E.  The Sokol in the Czech Lands to 1914: Training for the Nation.  New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
Added pictures, hope not too many, but I guess it is dificult to make idea of Sokol without actually seeing it. --Honza 00:47, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wikipedia already started a disambiguation page for Sokol before these posts of May 2006.  
Should "Sokol the movement" be the default article?  Yes, with worldwide "Sokol movement" membership larger than membership of any of the other disambiguated terms, Sokol the movement should be the default article.  
But, doesn't "Sokol in Czech lands" need disambiguation also?  Or at least, clarification.  After all, Czech refers to the language and culture.  Czechoslovakia became a nation after Sokol.  Bohemia goes back to before the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, so what makes Czech lands and culture?  With the spread of Czechs and Sokols through out the world, what lands are not the Czech lands, from Wisconsin to Australia?SalineBrain (talk) 13:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization - disambiguation 

message: There are strong Sokol movements abroad, outside the commonly-accepted "Czech lands" of Europe, that need description and documentation, as well as appreciation of their history.  Why not stub out Sokols in the Americas, Australia, and Western Europe?SalineBrain (talk) 13:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are mostly places where people from Czech origins liked to meet. Not exclusively of course but mostly. If you read French, you can see the part of the French article that deals with it. For that reason, I think it is best to deal with that aspect here and not in a specific article. --Bombastus (talk) 17:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization - stubs for Sokols abroad 

message: I have done a slight rewrite of some of the page to clean up the grammar. Lstanley1979 (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English grammar and usage 

message: I don't think there is any reason why Pionýr would have special section in this article. So, I have removed it and only add the link to its article in the “See Also” section.
Ceplm (talk) 21:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pionýr has nothing to do with Sokol
Talk:Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek

message: The second reference "Ausführlicher Artikel über Eva Glawischnig" (PDF) (in German). Salzburger Nachrichten. Retrieved 2008-08-21.
is not valid anymore. Maybe the homepage has moved or something and therefore this should be updated   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Κριός0 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alleged admin culture of abuse and tolerance of abuse

message: I have moved some of the material from the main page to here as I think I dragged the discussion away from the topic at hand ... no information destroyed Courtland 18:23, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Silverback, this relates to your statement "Courtland appeared to be relying upon that" on the main page in the context of my thanking Radiant! for restoring the page history.  Please do not use your assumption of my naivete as a weapon in your disputes.  Thank you. Courtland 01:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, I thought you were thanking and accepting this part of his statement: "Please note that the majority of edits were to disagree with the RFC, or to accuse its originator of trolling".  A simplistic characterization, that I disagree with. Again, apologies.--Silverback 09:55, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to Silverlback's looking out for me 

message: I note that there have been more than a dozen edits to the article since it was put up for deletion, so the community itself seems to find it worth commenting upon.  Hopefully it will lead to progress.--Silverback 03:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  continuing interest in the RfC
Talk:Paris Fire Brigade

message: From the article: "The brigade is a branch of the French Army and consists of military personnel, who are placed at the disposal of the Paris Prefecture of Police in an arrangement similar to that of the French Gendarmerie (they end the yearly Bastille Day parade, and are traditionally the most applauded unit)."
Is this supposed to say that the Paris Fire Brigade end the Bastille Day parade, or that the Gendarmerie end the parade? If it's the former, it should be clarified - it's a nice fact, but very ambiguous - and if it's the latter, it's irrelevant and should be removed. -- Scott Wilson 18:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Needed 

message: "The operational personnel (hommes du rang i.e. privates" Aren't corporals "hommes du rang" too? Do they belong to the operational personnel? Can't NCOs and commissioned officers belong to the operational personnel? Apokrif 03:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The operational personnel (hommes du rang i.e. privates 

message: I don't think that a fire service is properly within the scope of WP:MED.  If you disagree, please leave a note on the specific page for the project.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMED
Talk:Kingston Bible College Academy

message: note: The four letter acronym KBCA currently is a redirect to this article. KBCA was also a popular jazz radio station in Los Angeles, California in the 60s & 70s. If an article on the radio station ever gets written, then KBCA will probably become the title for the radio station article and then a disambiguation article will need to be created. BlankVerse 05:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  KBCA 
Talk:Peterborough Cathedral

message: Image:PBcath.jpg|Current version: OK detail but poor lighting, heavy perspective distortion and top of left tower missing
Image:Peterborough Cathedral oblique view.jpg|Oblique view: Detail is OK, lighting is good, perspective is OK
Image:Peterborough Cathedral March 2010.jpg|High-resolution view: Very good detail, perspective OK, good lighting; bottom right is obscured
There are now three possible pictures to go in the infobox at the top of the article. I would like to replace the picture currently being used, because it cuts off the left tower and because the problems with perspective and lighting don't do justice to the majesty of the building. Bearing the above discussion in mind, I think Oblique view might be a suitable replacement. Any comments? NotFromUtrecht (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which lead picture? 

message: This really needs a section, covering, among other things, the nave ceiling, . KJP1 (talk) 08:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture
Talk:Nine Lives

message: Removed the following from the dab entry Nine Lives (2005 film). If you create the article it might be useful:
:"It tells the stories of nine women using nine Steadicam shots of about 11 minutes each."
--Commander Keane 18:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Nine Lives (2005 film)

message: Added a new possibility for "9lives": a Flemish game website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmos (talk • contribs) 22:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 9lives (Flemish website)

message: There are several entries on this page that are specifically 9 Lives, not Nine Lives. Therefore, I propose that we make a 9 Lives disambig page specifically for those, with links between the two pages. seresin ( ¡? ) 22:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a Wikipedia standard that addresses this?  If not, I'd say that unless and until the page gets enough entries to justify splitting based on size, it would be better to keep them in a single list.  For one thing, others who come along later might be inclined to add duplicate entries to both lists.  For another, users are more like to view "9 Lives" and "Nine Lives" as virtually interchangeable, or erroneously conclude that a page doesn't exist because they look in the wrong list.  Still, I could go either way on the question.  --Mwalimu59 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are four listings that are specifically 9 Lives. So I'd say it's justified. I'd also be watching both pages, and would ensure that entries are in the both pages. As for your last concern, the links to the other page at the tops of the two pages to the other should resolve that. seresin ( ¡? ) 23:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  9 Lives vs Nine Lives 

message: What the hell is wrong with you wikipedians? 
I'm trying to get more infos on Deuce (Ex-Hollywood undead) but you deleted his wikipedia's page when it's been voted Keep 
WTF? There's something in my country we call democraty, you should respect it, One day his wikipedia's page will be out again and if you delete it, you better prepare for war because our nations are built on Share and Democraty. You can't delete something you don't like. You can't delete it because you support HU. Wikipedia is Free, wikipedia is alive because of donations of the public if we vote something, you keep and you shut the f-ck up You don't even have a word to say. Please Keep this message in your mind next time. This is also valuable for you moderators. You are not paid, You're not employed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.186.146 (talk) 06:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the f---
Talk:Frederick Frelinghuysen (general)

message: I removed the Continental Army category - Frelinghuysen was an officer of the state militia. He saw action at the Battle of Trenton, but as a member of the militia, not the Continental establishment. Lou I 18:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We now have militia categories, so I added those. —Kevin Myers 06:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Service 

message: "Frederick Frelinghuysen (senator)", the current article name, is insufficiently disambiguated."Frederick Frelinghuysen", the above's grandson, was also a U.S. Senator from New Jersey. The grandson's article name includes his middle name.I suggest this article be moved, to either:"Frederick Frelinghuysen (Continental Congress)" or"Frederick Frelinghuysen (American Revolutionary War)". Any other suggestions? --AuthorityTam (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Frederick Frelinghuysen#Senator. --AuthorityTam (talk) 17:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab2010 
Talk:Tumbler (Project Xanadu)

message: It would seem that the title of this article should be "tumbler" rather than "tumblers", unless it is never used in the singular.  However, it should have some qualifier in parentheses to distinguish it from other "tumbler" articles.  But what should that qualifier be?  "Tumbler (hypertext)", "Tumbler (Project Xanadu)", or something else?  Anyone care to speculate? Gwimpey 18:52, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename article to "Tumbler (...)" ? 

message: This title, "Tumblers", should not be plural. "Tumbler" is a disambiguation page, so Gwimpeys first suggestion is put forward. – Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 17:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The page "Purple Numbers" links to seems to have been deleted and linked to Douglas Englebert's page. Douglas Englebert's page doesn't mention purple numbers. This should probably be replaced by a descriptive paragraph (eg under something like related concepts), or the purple numbers page should be resurrected. -- Resuna (talk) 12:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Purple Numbers" link