Talk:Saint Andrew's School, Singapore

message: Is the issue about SAJC students being suspended by their principal for blogging nasty stuff about their teachers news-worthy enough to add it to the section? Cmyk 05:46, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: SAJC and blogging

message: Also, wouldn't it be better if each school has its own page? Merging them together makes everything abit constrained. Furthermore, how many students actually go through 12 years in St Andrew's? The numbers are definitely not significant enough to warrant a merged page. And MOE still sees them as 3 separate entities isn't it? Cmyk 05:50, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Let the Saints be Saints. Merge if we can. Is it ok? Zero (talk) 11:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Zero (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 in 1?

message: Haven't heard about the suspension. Any idea what blog sites they were? haha...
:"Schools act against students for 'flaming' teachers on blogs
:FREE speech may be the buzzword on the Internet - but libel is unacceptable everywhere. The message has been sent out loud and clear, with five junior college students being punished for posting offensive remarks about two teachers and a vice-principal online. The students, all girls, were made to remove the remarks from their Internet diaries, or blogs, and suspended for three days last month. Their parents were also informed."
:This was part of the article which came out on 27th Sept 2005 Straits Times cover page. Considering it came out on the front page of the national papers, I would think it would be an issue worth mentioning. It preceeded the whole racist blogger stuff. And the blogging about SAF thing. Problem is they initially did NOT say it was SAJC, they just said it was a junior college. But after awhile there were hints of which school it was here and there and it became pretty obvious to everybody. Cmyk 08:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup... so do we work on improving the content of each first then separate them. Or separate them then work on the content? I'm new here, and I haven't really figured out how to separate articles... Oops! Cmyk 07:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information needed. 

message: :Image:SAJC1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SAJC1.jpg

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating