lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Woody Harrelson

message: Yes, it was a, "Light-Hearted," game, and Woody Harrelson may have received a little help from the Grandmaster Yasser Sierawan, and he did try a pretty good variation of the Fool's Mate, except very few people can say that they drew against Grandmaster Kasparov.  <https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1282198>Easeltine (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woody Harrelson vs. Garry Kasparov 

message: Woodrow Tracy Harrelson[2][3] was born in Midland, Texas, on July 23, 1961,[4] to secretary Diane (née Oswald)[5] and convicted hitman Charles Voyde Harrelson.[4] 
Well, his father wasn't a convicted hitman until Woody was 18...this is like saying he was born to a dead man since Charles Voyde Harrelson is dead now.  71.162.113.226 (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  not yet 

message: Needs italics and hyperlink Halcyon grun Sproutz (talk) 02:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 film The Highwaymen 

message: Subject says it all, doesn't it? 2600:6C56:7E00:FF24:CCDF:FEA5:44CA:2CB3 (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why have there been no updates? 

message: I removed this addition about Harrelson's recent monologue on SNL.. The citation read more like an op-ed than a piece of real reporting. There may be an argument for inclusion, but it doesn't deserve more than a small mention and it will need to be better sourced. I'd lean that it's too WP:RECENT and fails the WP:20YT to justify inclusion, but others may disagree. Please find consensus here before including. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 04:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNL Monologue  

message: I don’t think Matthew should be listed as his brother until there’s concrete DNA evidence they’re related. All there is so far is speculation and coincidence. 87.102.0.47 (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree Timzog (talk) 09:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matthew Mcconaughey brother
Talk:Unification Movement

message: Is that really at all necessary and appropriate in this article? I'd like to know if anyone but me feels it is disrespectful and pointless in the article. Vaguely 20:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forrest Gump reference 

message: No proposal for a merge into Unification Church has been made yet on this page, (and, obviously, no rationale provided), nor do I think it is likely to be supported by knowledgeable people. The distinction between the Unification Church proper and the totality of all organizations, businesses, projects, and ideas associated with Sun Myung Moon is an important one. That's why Rep. Donald Frasier, in the early days of Unificationism expanding into a so-called "movement," felt compelled to make up his own name for it, and called it "the Moon organization." -Exucmember 18:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition of the Unification Church in its own article has been expanded to include the entire community of Unificationist believers.  Not just the HSA-UWC.  As far as I know there has never been an organization officially called the Unification Church, although I might be wrong about this. Steve Dufour 20:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bass Brewery

message: Uncited list moved here from the article. SilkTork *YES! 10:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bass in art

message: "Prior to establishing a brewery, William Bass transported ale for brewer Benjamin Printon."
Although this is a claim repeatedly made, Bass couldn't have been transporting ale for Printon because Printon had died in 1729, when Bass was only 12. Printon's brewery was run by the Musgrave family from 1729 to 1803 - see here Zythophile (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History - Printon error 

message: Bass Ale is a top ten premium canned ale in the UK, with 16,080 hectolitres sold in 2010.[10]
That was then: what is the position today?
86.132.18.221 (talk) 11:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: brand's defunct for now. UK brewery rights are still belonging to Molson Coors. US had plans to be created with inbev but never transpired, so any future product would belong to Molson Coors. Sucker for All (talk) 12:51, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canned? 

message: Surely BASS "was" a Brewer and whilst Bass Beer is still available, it is, as the article says simply a brand of AB-InBev, brewed by Carlsberg Marston. G4ugm (talk) 09:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense?
Talk:Trigonal planar molecular geometry

message: All the bond/geometry rules have exceptions. Perhaps this should be accounted for in the article.
* Why do you not participate in writing and extending the article!. You appear to have an expert opinion that Wiki can use. I agree the existence of several exceptions should not mean that you can no longer say that in general these bond angles occur.  V8rik 21:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Having said that... 
Talk:Cumene process

message: I like the mention of Chemical engineering, but 'chemical engineering at its best'? --Morbid-o 20:23, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the article stick to some consistency in naming chemical compounds? You have benzene and phenol in the first paragraph, but then there's also acetone and propylene, known as propanone and propene respectively in IUPAC nomenclature. Is it possible to just stick with one convention for naming compounds? Nonagonal Spider (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC names 

message: this version of m-cresol describes that n-propane alkylates toluene to yield isomers of cymene. Cymene is then oxidatively dealkylated analogous to the cumene process. --- Ktsquare (talk) 00:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is m-crseol mass produced by the cumene process too?
Talk:Epsilon Eridani

message: A new paper dropped, and Ran is now found to have three overlapping activity cycles: 1060 ± 30 days / ∼2.9 years, 3970 ± 54 / 10.9 years, and 12,355 ± 230 days / ~33.8 years. AstroChara (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 - activity cycle update 

message: Much of the information about the debris disc on this page was about 20 years out of date. I've updated and corrected much of it, although certainly more work could be done on this. It's still not entirely clear to me what should be the distinction between the information on the disc in the Properties section and that in the Observational History section.
I've added my own ALMA image of the disc. Potentially this could be the main image at the top of the page, but I fear it may be verging on self-publication to choose to do that myself and so I wanted to check the opinions of others on this.
Perhaps controversially, I have slimmed down the parts on the predicted planet. To my knowledge, there's no other case of a predicted planet being given such prominence. I felt the information on it's prediction should be kept to the debris disc section until such a time that it's actually detected and confirmed. AstroMark (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you for your contributions to this article, which seem reasonable, and for uploading that image. However, per WP:SELFCITE (and 'supplying photographs' further down that page), it is good practice to discuss on the talk page before adding citations to your own work, new text based upon your publications, or images sourced from them. Modest Genius talk 16:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. I apologise for not writing here first. AstroMark (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debris disc and eps Eri c 

message: Is it noteworthy that the original Babylon 5 series mostly takes place in this solar system? 2601:441:5000:ADF0:1827:3ED9:E223:18FD (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance in fiction
Talk:Mari Holden

message: In 1996, the U.S. Olympic Trials for women consisted of a linked set of 5 races - 2 time trials, and 3 road races. Overall standings in the Trials was determined by a point system based on performance in all of the events. Holden did not finish in 1st overall. In fact, she did not finish high enough to qualify for the U.S. Olympic team that year. However, she did win both of the Time Trials.
JFPerry (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996 U.S. Olympic Trials
Talk:Pange lingua gloriosi corporis mysterium

message: * give author credit, or anyway some source, for the English translation used
* Add section on various English translations; could summarize the Catholic Encyclopedia article
That translation is awful. It would be better to have a simple prose translation.
:It's not a strict translation, but one of the most common English versions of the hymn. And it's hardly awful, managing to keep the sense of most of the words while being singable to the same tune - not an easy task. PaulGS 04:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 

message: If there are no objections, I'm going to make separate pages for each of the Pange Lingua hymns - it's not right that the Aquinas version be the main focus of this page, to the virtual exclusion of the other. InfernoXV (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! InfernoXV (talk) 12:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 

message: Anton Bruckner composed two settings of the Pange lingua: WAB 31 (1st strophe) and WAB 33 (1st, and last 2 stophes = Tantum ergo). He also composed eight settings of the Tantum ergo. Out of them, the Tantum ergo, WAB 32 was first published as Pange lingua by Wöss, as sung in the example by the choir Rondo Histriae. This example is thus not an optimal choice. I will replace it by a performance of the "true" Pange lingua, WAB 31. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 12:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anton Bruckner's compositions 

message: , I know German music is more your thing, but if you wouldn't mind giving some pointers here on what could be improved/where to look, I'd appreciate it as I'm not at all sure what our standards for musical works are. I believe I mentioned to you about a year ago that I needed to get this to GA so it could be DYK on Holy Thursday this year. Obviously that isn't happening, but I need to make it a plan to improve over the next year, and asking for feedback while it is on my mind seemed best. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to improve
Talk:Scott Shaw

message: This article has a Wikipedian who for some reason instead of trying to improve any problems they find with it continues to chip away at it in both a large and small fashion without any discussion at every opportunity including contacting at least one other Wikipedian to target this man’s films listed on WP. I thought it might be a good idea instead of continuing this process to edit this article down to its most basic information and if anyone wants to add to it they can. I have left the previous references for other editors and have added a few new ones I found. 
Cheers, Chinanski (talk) 00:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Streamline
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wiki Syntax/redirect-target-000.txt

message: Please note that the purpose of this page is currently being contested.  --Fbriere 09:53, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I have submitted a bug report, as follows:
::A link to a redirect page appears blue rather than red even when the redirect page's target does not exist.  A red link would call attention to the article's non-existence and therefore cause an expert who sees it to write a good new article. Pre-emptive redirect pages are important and I've put a lot of work into them.  I am alarmed to discover that Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax/redirect-target-000.txt and its sister pages exist in their present form, in which they incite vandalism in the form of wholesale deletion of pre-emptive redirect pages.  But someone argued in favor of wholesale deletion of redirect pages when their targets don't exist and no pages link to them, by pointing out those blue links.
::So it is necessary, if at all possible, to make links to redirect pages appear red rather than blue when the redirect page's target does not exist.
Michael Hardy 23:57, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bug report
Talk:Skyscrapers in film

message: what about the tower in Gremlins 2? wasn't that the Clamp Tower? (clem 21:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: should 1 Canada Square (the canary wharf tower) be included? --82.34.188.125 12:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 Canada Square
Talk:Horn & Hardart

message: This is according to https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/bs-md-kelly-horn-20230805-y4zjokpeofboxpvngbudvrzgsu-story.html.  Any references for other Baltimore locations?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.201.32.14 (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The Baltimore Horn location was not an automat

message: automat hardart ....  0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ebay images WP:PD 

message: The article begins talking about  "Philadelphia's Joseph Horn (1861–1941) and German-born, New Orleans-raised Frank Hardart (1850–1918) 
There's a nice article in Wiki about Hardart, but none about Horn.  This is a serious deficiency that should be rectified by someone qualified to do create at least a simple biography. LarryWiki115 (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Horn? 

message: Just thought I'd mention that there's a new company that's been created, and they filed for the trademarks (in 2023), and they are selling coffee (and t-shirts/cups/merch) under the Horn & Hardart and Automat names. Horn & Hardart | Official Site: Historic Automat Coffee Since 1888 On their website they're clearly trying to blur the distinction between the famous original company/phenomenon, and their new nostalgia grift, saying stuff like "Celebrating 135 Years Experience the iconic flavors that stretch back more than a century" (the taste of coffee stretches back many centuries, wonder why they don't try to claim that too!) 207.237.14.175 (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New company coat-tailling on the name of the old company
Talk:Phytotherapy

message: in regards to  it may be a good idea, are there other opinions?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What may be a good idea? Merging to herbalism or adding the word pseudoscientific to the lede? The merge discussion was started elsewhere. see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Archive_88#Merge_Phytotherapy_to_Herbalism.Dialectric (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: both actually...--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you elaborate on policy-based reasons for your position? Dialectric (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOTDICTIONARY & Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Obvious_pseudoscience. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 23:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with the position that it is obvious pseudoscience. Would you characterize Wiley's peer reviewed Phytotherapy Research as a journal of pseudoscience? On what basis?Dialectric (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely, just because it's a journal does not make it scientific. There are lots of chiropractic journals, that doesn't make them less bunk. I am still under the impression that >95 % of this article could be deleted and the remaining portion merged to Herbalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 13:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I am still having trouble seeing where you are coming from with this. Are you arguing that plants can't have measurable medicinal effects? or that these can't be determined through controlled trials similar to those used for pharmaceuticals?Dialectric (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

text: "Evidence-based medicine using plants" might be a more understandable title and might guide the direction of the article, but I regret that the concept might need a phrase instead of a term to make it clear. I am not sure what name is best but "phytotherapy" is causing problems.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: I see there was a fragmentary proposal back in October 2016 to merge to Herbalism. Since it does not seem to have been complete (not having been posted over there), I have started a discussion over there at Talk:Herbalism#Proposed_merge to carry out the merge afresh, and invite all interested editors to join it there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge to [[Herbalism]]
Talk:Mobile government

message: Who originally wrote this article? It's fascinating. Mobile government seems to complete the de-territorialization of the state, going way beyond open borders
Binaryborealis Double-plus fascinating, yes. I'm trying to decide which abbreviation of Mobile Government to use while copy-editing this page -- internal consistency is important. The opening statement uses mGovernment, but the first section uses the term m-government. Thoughts?
Binaryborealis On further inspection, it seems the hyphenated form is only used once, so it's probably accidental.
Binaryborealis 01:24, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC) On further further inspection, this is too large of a job for me. I'll come back to this area later when I'm more familiar with Wikipedia.
----
The article as written is a marketing pitch for Mobile Government, not an article about Mobile Government.  The bulk of the article is not encyclopedic. I'm going to work on it.  The work in progress can be found at User:Bubamara/mobile government.  And I can't resist this little rant:
Quoting from the article in the "Implementing Issues" section: 
* "Protecting privacy and providing security for the data and interactions: Privacy and security are the most significant concerns citizens may have about mGovernment. The general fear is that their mobile phone numbers will be traced, when they enter into transactions or send their opinions and inquiries to the government. The government and related parties must overcome the mistrust, and assure mobile users that people’s privacy is protected and that the information will not be sold to third parties."
** not "work on technology and legislation to actually protect citizens and address their issues"?  No, just run a PR campaign to make them disregard their own legitimate concerns. That is dumb.
Bubamara 17:39, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Uig, Lewis

message: This article contains history moved from Uig. —Korath (Talk) 22:23, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
:The history has now been fixed (mostly), by moving the restored Uig page and recreating the new page Uig (disambiguation) -- Solipsist 22:23, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the reference glitches. I am not sure why you removed the 'online whisky shop' reference but if you have any further suggestions and are struggling with the wiki-mark up just drop a note for me here. Regards, Ben MacDui 09:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Overpower

message: Why is this a disambiguation?  There's apparently only one encyclopedia topic that can be written here.  If someone links here to mean "overcome, subdue, overwhelm", where else should they be linking?  As you can see such links should be removed because they can't be disambiguated, making this disambiguation page pointless. WP:WINAD --Mrwojo 22:25, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Camber angle

message: I feel that the stance car community is big enough and camber is such a major element in the stance community that there needed to be a section about stance cars in this article. I also felt like adding a section dedicated to camber wear to explain how positive and negative camber effects tire wear differently. There wasn't quite enough information on the effects of camber in a straight line, so I added a couple more effects on camber in a straight line. ￼ 95miata (talk) 02:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:The Forever Hero

message: I have rewritten this page for both factual and aesthetic reasons. Since the edit description is not big enough, I will briefly mention my changes here.
* I removed allusions to genetic modifications (the orignial author claimed it was unclear if deliberate tampering had happened - I am convinced this never happened, and was not meant to be implied)
* I streamlined the language used
* I added dates to the books mentioned.
* I corrected the link to the author page
- Kvetch 23:00, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Japanese writing system

message: The "Infobox" currently says "Direction: Left-to-right", which is incomplete or misleading since Japanese can also be written vertically. Someone has now added an explanatory note below this, but ideally the "Direction" field should be changed. However, the way in which the "Left-to-right" text is generated is ridiculously cryptic, and I do not understand how to change it. Perhaps someone else will be able to do it. 31.49.180.129 (talk) 19:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the writing style to to Mixed. Would you rather prefer "Left-to-Right, Top-to-Bottom"? Lourdes 01:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If written vertically, it is written top to bottom, and right to left. If written horizontally, it is most often left to right, just like standard English text. In the early to mid-1900s, there were some cases of horizontal text being written right to left, but that style has fallen out of favor and is very rarely seen these days. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 05:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . I don't know how to represent all of this because the direction factor only gives flat results (like "Mixed" or "Left-to-Right, Top-to-Bottom"). So what I could do is maybe I could write "Left-to-Right, Right-to-Left, Top-to-Bottom" and then give clarification as per your note inside the infobox. What do you say? Lourdes 11:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe use "Varies" and add an explanatory footnote? Feel free to use my wording if you wish, and tweak it as needed. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , , I have done the changes. Hope it looks fine? Lourdes 00:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks good to me. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

text: My comments, FWIW. I wonder whether we need to explain this in detail both here and in the "Direction of writing" section. Would it be neater to just have a link? Also, I think the labels "ISO 15924" and "Jpan, 413" are confusing. It gives the impression that the textual description is a part of that ISO standard, but when you click on the link and look at the relevant entries there is nothing bearing any relation to this text. 109.146.248.31 (talk) 02:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of the weirdness of the formatting ("Direction" appearing above the ISO 15942 letter code), I just put it in the "footnotes" parameter. V2Blast (talk) 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Would something like "Vertical: top-to-bottom; Horizontal: left-to-right" work? Is there enough room in the section to fit that? Separate lines? Rourensu (talk) 19:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction of writing