Talk:Tree-kangaroo

message: Press reports as of 2006 are touting the Golden-mantled Tree-kangaroo as a newly discovered species. This isn't true; the animal was known previously and named by Timothy Fridtjof Flannery in 1993; it is generally considered a subspecies in the Dendrolagus goodfellowi complex . The significance of the recent finds is that the animal had not been seen in the wild for some years and it was feared it might be extinct. Gdr 14:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Where came the information about the genera's evolution? I can't find anything that says that they evolve from wallaby-like animals. (Just to be clear, I'm not a creationist, I just want to have the references for the article right, because I'm translating it for the spanish-speaker wikipedia). For the diet and anatomy I can find something on the web (I think). thanks .--200.90.245.160 (talk) 14:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Evolution

message: Are these animals of the order 'Diprotodontia' as is suggested by the reference to tree-kangaroos on the Diprotodontia page? Leegee23 (talk) 14:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomic Order?

message: Just interested if this is a Tree-kangeroo (and if so, which one):
http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-vn4553933
I note that in the picture (see link above) that it is called a Wallaby?
Thanks
122.150.200.116 (talk) 13:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone ID this critter for me? :O) 

message: Cursory views of tree kangaroos in the wild show that they can (unusually) move their hindlegs independently.  This is an arboreal adaptation that I feel requires mentioning in the "description" section.
38.112.100.65 (talk) 16:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's probably worth mentioning, but please provide proposed text and a citation to a WP:RS reliable source. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomical Details 

message: Substituted at 09:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: I moved a section that did not discuss taxonomy in general, but referred to status of various sub-species/species. I feel that an overview of the current species was more useful before such a discussion. If a general discussion on taxonomy was written, that would be appropriate in the position below the heading Taxonomy, or so it seems to me. Brunswicknic (talk) 09:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shift of sub-species text 

message: Im concerned that Wikipedia is not for everyone on all walks of life this is not okay you're not going to every aspect of what happened in the beginning so please do that for the greater good of everyone. Please respect my opinion ! STOP JUDGING ME AND EVERYONE'S OPINION!!!!!! If you would like to talk just you know find out how .104.158.246.5 (talk) 16:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution is not real 

message: Im not getting rights here to publish a good edit. 104.158.246.5 (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cant make good changes 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion