Talk:Gregor Eisenhorn

message: "Their most capable and popular author"? Does NPoV mean anything here? Suggest replacing with "successful" --Charax 10:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold! Cheers --Pak21 10:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPoV 

message: According to the second Eisenhorn book, 'Malleus', the events in 'Xenos' take place in "the summer of 240 [240.M41]", not 720.M41 as listed in the article. Additionally, 'Malleus' is stated as taking place in 338.M41. I've fixed this in the article. --Xenomrph 22:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates and ages 

message: "Eisenhorn manages to catch up with Urisel Glaw, who confirms that House Glaw is in league with Slaanesh. Eisenhorn then kills him."
Eisenhorn does NOT kill Urisel. 
Urisel gets knocked out and Eisenhorn hands him over to the Inquisition (Commodus Voke, Titus Endor, Schongard, etc.). Urisel Glaw gets tortured - heavily - so that the Inquisiton can learn what exactly the "true matter" is.
--Jubei 14:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We're trying. Please assume good faith, and if you see an error, why not be bold and fix it, rather than just posting about it here? Cheers --Pak21 15:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT 

message: Don't MergeOk someone has suggested this be merged with the Eisenhorn article, however as I understood it, the article was specifically about the man and not the series of books which should be under an article titled "The Eisenhorn Trilogy", or something similar in my opinion. Cherubael was a character from the series and not even one of the most notable ones. Would you create and article on Eyeclone? No.--Nayl 03:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you suggest happens to the Cherubael article if it's not merged here? He/she/it isn't a notable character as suggested by our guidelines, so the only other thing I see to happen to it is to delete it. It seems to me that merging it here would be preferable to that. Cheers --Pak21 08:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If we merge the Cherubael article with the Eisenhorn article then there will be a strong argument for putting all the other characters that are notable within the series, but not within the Warhammer Universe as a whole, into the article, which I think you agree (I don't see how you couldn't) would make the article unnessecarily long. --Nayl 18:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Nayl. I propose no merger. --Falcorian (talk) 03:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Eisenhorn has his own model in the Inquisitor game. As does Cherubael, and they are separated in the rulebook. Since they are in their own books and have their own models in the Inquisitor game, and the books are of substantial lengths, the Cherubael page should be expanded. SanchiTachi 16:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherubael 

message: I wasn't aware that wikipedia was going to be renamed "Storytime". Seriously, why is the entire plot of the first book there and why just the first book? For now, I'm going to be bold and shorten it dramatically but I think it should be removed completely. --Nayl 03:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Done but it still needs some work. --Nayl 03:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenos 

message: The Black Library books should be given their own page and expanded. Perhaps, it should be a page containing all of that author's books. The current page should be purified of a lot of the fluff, boiled down to a brief history (three or four paragraphs), a description of his character, his actions, and his companions. I can work on some of this later if no one else wants to. SanchiTachi 16:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for Clean Up