Talk:Arceus

message: I think we should try to get this article to a Good Article standard.
Spareus151 19:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article

message: Does anyone think arkoos has some sort of relation to Mew? -- Lord Crayak
:No, no more than is needed by the fact that Arkoos created the world, and presumably Mew. And it wouldn't matter if we did, per WP:OR. -Amarkov babble 00:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arkoos and Mew

message: What, no "ArKOOS" jokes yet? Everyone who has edited this article must be either Japanese or American. =) JIP | Talk 07:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I never even thought about it until you brought it up.  Sometimes I just want to kick vandals in the "Arceus".  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 07:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are Arceus jokes. Just none here. -Amarkov babble 14:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had thought of one that ended in "Wipeus", but I didn't really think it suitable for Wikipedia. Just you wait, the vandals will appear. Double Dash (Talk to me) 21:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that in America, it only really works if we start calling it Arceus.  --Brandon Dilbeck 19:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where you live, maybe, but over here in San Jose it works just fine as it is. -Amarkov babble 23:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't get the joke. Voretustalk 17:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The joke is that "arse" and "ass" are the same words.  -SaturnMario screaming THE VOICES 18:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. Right. Carry on, then! Voretustalk 18:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Poké-underlings.  Who knows???  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 04:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the chicken came before the egg. And Arseus is the chicken. Cipher (Yell) 23:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you're talking about the chicken egg.  Because dinosaur eggs came before chicken eggs (as well as chickens).  --Brandon Dilbeck 02:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fine, he's the dinosaur. 99.244.171.114 23:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Maybe Arseus created Mew right after it was born and then it created 3 more Mew's which became those three mew like pokemon from Shinnouh of hope, dream and wisdom that embody the essence of life and then 2 more Mew's were created and they became the pokemon of time and space, and maybe after they created time and space Celebi was born and then Ho-oh, and Lugia, and then, Rayquaza, Kyogre and Groudon, and then Deoxis, and finally Ditto which led to basic evolution; BUT! where does that leave the Unown?????
...this isn't a place to post fan speculation. Blue Mirage | Comment 04:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree 2603:6011:6F02:636:7147:E8AA:1C2D:8509 (talk) 20:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Yeah, Arceus in the English version.—ウルタプ 02:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ArKOOS"? 

message: 14:41, 1 December 2006 216.11.82.90 (Talk) (Revert, what the hell??)
In response to my re-adding the Arkoos picture.
I would like to know just exactly what the problem is with the picture.
-- M C Y 1008 22:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no problem. User has been warned for personal attacks. -Amarkov blahedits 00:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: Back around Novemeber 5th or 6th, there were some characteristics removed. I was just wondering why, since they didn't seem to be bothering anything, and they just looked like food for thought. The specific references were making comparisons between Aruseus and the qilin, and also to the forest spirit from Princess Mononoke. I can understand the removal of the comparison to the cover of the 'pokemon jade' box, but the rest just seemed like it was removed unnecessarily. Os-osiris 15:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't have a source, so it was original research. -Amarkov blahedits 15:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification, I hadn't realised it wasn't cited! Os-osiris 17:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals From the Characteristics 

message: I just wanted to suggest the possibility that the name Arseus could be a portmanteau of the latin words Ars (art / technique), and Deus (God). I realize this is original research which is why I did not want to edit into the page just yet, but the possibility seems strong considering Arseus' role as the creator pokemon. At least I think it should be considered for when the etymology is added. Os-osiris 18:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! Very smart! I think it may be a good idea to add it into the article. I don't think Zues is a part of the name, but a word that means "god"? I think that is much more likely. In my opinion, go ahead and do it! Floramage! 17:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Zeus" is actually very possible; in Japanese, Zeus is written "Zeusu" (not something like "Zuusu"...the Japanese are weird with ancient Greek), and "seusu" IS in Arseus's name (see rendaku for why "z" and "s" are somewhat interchangeable). But I'll admit I like ars and deus much better.—ウルタプ 00:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still hard to say whether Zeus or Deus is the intended reference, but since they both originate from the same word "Dyeus", it is perhaps possible that they can both apply.Os-osiris 07:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: It kind of has a ring to it, huh? "Arseus". Nice. Floramage! 20:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: That's also very possible. The origin of Arch being Arc, and since Arceus is being reported as the official english name by pe2k, it would appear to be the direction the translators chose.Os-osiris 07:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I was wondering. If you fully trained Absol to the max without the      us, it's attack could be greater than most of Arseus's stats. Is that why they could be rivals?
:Um... That's true of many Pokemon. 120 base is only high if it's in everything. -Amarkov blahedits 03:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Arseus is the creator of all pokemon and he could beat any of them The only one that might be abel to deafet him is mewtwo—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.236.22.8 (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For one, Aruseus is among the Ubers. But it's nowhere near being the Uber pokemon. Consider it a slightly weaker Alakazam with higher defenses, or a slightly less-sturdy Yonoir with higher offenses, or possibly even a slower Ninjask with better all-around stats. The straight 120s make it extremely flexible, but it also inhibits it from being as potentially useful as, say, a sweeping Groudon, or a tanking Lugia. That's basically my long-winded way of answering your question as, "No, they're not rivals." You Can't See Me! 08:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absol vs. Arseus 

message: There is a sprite of Arseus in the Bulbapedia Image Archives of Arseus being a ???-type.  Is this real? 67.87.66.127 00:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was ripped from the games themselves. Either it's an error handler or some secret unobtainable form, as there is no plate for it to hold to make it transform into that. But it is indeed the ???-type. DanPMK 21:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh... come on, people. The image on the Bulbapedia Image Archives is of Arseus with the Larva Plate attached as a held item. See this page ... Please do more research before making ridiculous claims of there being a ???-type plate. -- The M.P. 03:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: …we're saying there isn't a ???-type plate…that's why it's weird there's a SPRITE for a ???-type Arseus. (See Psypoke - Picture Dex :: #493 - Aruseusu then click for the "unknown" sprite set.) Also, your "Larva Plate" argument is nil.  Arseus's ring (and "trim", for lack of a better term) is a yellowish-green.—ウルタプ 04:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i don't think that DanPMK should be so sure of himself, my first reaction would be that someone merely recolored a sprite, indeed it would be easy to do for Arseus because the rest of it is white and when you apply hue changes to an image, white and black are unaffected. I could make a GIF that has Arseus go through all it's colors and then upload it saying it's a RAINBOW-type Arseus.  9/10 times when it's seems weird it's a hoax -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. You guys appear to be partly right. The sprite is, indeed, ripped from the game, and is not actually Arseus with the Larva Plate attached. Furthermore, it's not a recoloring, as I had suspected, but not voiced. On the other hand, I highly doubt that this sprite is of a ???-type Arseus. The reasons? There is a shiny form of it, making this Arseus the only Pokémon with an alternate form aside from a shiny form (and apparently this form of Arseus also has a shiny form). My second reason for doubting a ???-type Arseus, is because the ??? type has never been used for attacks (aside from a status inducing/set damage inflicting one), and as a result, has no type matchups, meaning that we have no idea what type the ??? type is super effective against, not very effective against, or weak to. What do you say to that? -- The M.P. 19:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... This just occurred to me. Seeing as Arseus is a legendary Pokémon, this possibility didn't cross my mind earlier. Could this be the male/female sprite of Arseus (because, of course, we didn't consider that the sprite we usually associate with the normal Arseus could be the male/female sprite), and, perhaps, the sprites are the same for the plate forms? I'm aware that none of the true legendaries have ever had genders, but maybe this time... -- The M.P. 20:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No offense, but your "shiny ???-type makes no sense"...er, makes no sense. ALL the forms have shiny sprites.—ウルタプ 20:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: erm... I don't believe anyone ever said "shiny ???-type makes no sense". At least I didn't. Seeing as this strange form of Arseus has a shiny version, something I actually mentioned already, btw, I don't see how you could be directing that edit at me. -- The M.P. 15:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It would make sense that even though you can't GET a ??? type Arseus, they'd still have to make a sprite for it as the ??? type is still coded into the game, it isn't obtainable without a Gameshark I presume, and then it would probably not have weaknesses OR resistances... yeah, I'm through. The Phantomad 15:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I figure that maybe ??? was going to be designed as a type with no strengths or weaknesses. The Plate would likely be very well-hidden, since it would make Arceus an ultimate type. Heck, maybe they even left the ??? Plate in the game since no one would find it, as unlikely as it is.--Shroopliss 20:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

text: It is true. That's kind of its main premise.—ウルタプ 03:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???-Type Arseus? 

message: Is that seriously official art? It looks like some kid traced it or gave the sprite a blow-up and makeover...—ウルタプ 04:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously! It looks like total crap! I REALLY hope that isn't official... Floramage! 05:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: no it;s not the official art, it is currently still unavailable.  If anyone happens to find a full body picture, leave the link and i can upload it. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are we talking about the sprite that's currently used in the article?  It's the same picture that's used in the video games.  --Brandon Dilbeck 18:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A few days ago someone replaced the sprite with a crappy hand-drawn image. The sprite was reinstated.—ウルタプ 18:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Shouldn't the article have some discussion of Arseus being a "god" pokemon or having "created the world" or being the "creator" pokemon?  Why does the article make no mention of this when the talk page does? --Wykypydya 05:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It sure was there at one point...I'm too lazy to go through the history, but it was probably deleted by a vandal and overlooked by a good editor or something.—ウルタプ 06:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I commented it out because it wasn't sourced. The Mew thing seemed pretty weird... I started putting (most of) it back in, though ('cause the Pokédex translations at Bulbapedia corroborate the statements, mostly), and Wykypydya beat me to it. :P Is there anything that says that thing about Mew, though, 'cause that part seems like OR.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 16:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing essential information about Arseus? 

message: Can I ask why the article has been semi-protected?  There doesn't seem to be the vandalism to warrant it.  --Brandon Dilbeck 06:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's to stop new users from changing "Arseus" to "Arceus".- Floramage! 15:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... to tell the truth, frankly, the new users are appearing smarter than whoever locked this article from new user editing. At least right now. "Arceus" as opposed to "Arseus" is the official U.S. name. Now, if that someone or at least a person with authority lifted that lock, they would be doing themselves or another person a favor by not making themselves look ingnorant, and truly, not worthy to be working on this article. -- The M.P. 19:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sweetie, sorry to burst your bubble, but "Arceus" has yet to be confirmed. Until someone is able to prove that it is the official English name, it will be the new users who look ignorant, not the person or people who locked the page. I'd love for you to cite the official source of Arseus' true, English, and confirmed name. (Serebii.net and other fansites do not count as actual sources.) Have fun, honey.- Floramage! 19:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't write in a provocative manner. I've not the patience for it. Anyhow, the name "Arseus" was an early name misunderstanding, and it is now understood (by some, at least) that "Arceus" is the official U.S. name. Furthermore, would you care to cite a reliable source that directly or indirectly states that the name of our Pokémon here is "Arseus", or are you accepting Wikipedia as a reliable source, which obviously is not? To continue, how can rules that you make up apply to Wikipedia? serebii.net and other fansites (depending on the reliability of these sites, of course) can and do "count as an actual source." If several fansites known to be reliable in the past support consistent material, they simply must be trusted. Building on that, I'm sure you'd be happy to know that I've found several reliable sites supporting my "claim", if you will. See the following: , , , and . Not to mention bulbapedia.net also acknowledges arceus' name as "arceus", although even I wouldn't count bulbapedia.net as a particularly reliable source. Now that you've seen the evidence, you can't just blow it off because they're fansites and continue to be ignorant, can you? I'd like to see your answer. -- The M.P. 23:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your problem is, you're citing fansites which fail WP:RS and WP:ATT since they are self-published and have no independent fact-checking source.  When the English name is OFFICIALLY confirmed by Nintendo of America, we will change it to reflect the official US name.  Until then, these fansites don't cut the mustard as they all fail RS and ATT. -Jeske (v^_^v) 01:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Jeske Couriano brings up a good point. They are only fansites created by fans and are not in collaboration with Nintendo. Unless Pokemon.com states that "Arceus" is the actual, official English name, it cannot and should not be placed in the article. There simply is no proof. If its announced as official, fine. Then you were right. But at the very least, you should acknowledge the fact that we Wikipedians that are part of the Pokémon Collaborative Project are following the rules that apply to editing articles. Is that truly being ignorant? I don't believe it is; we all know that the name was leaked to several fansites and no one denies that, but the fact of the matter is, sweetie, that there's no solid evidence besides those rumors that the names are real for any of the 4th Generation Pokémon. So calm down and be kinder and more respectful to others. We are only trying to make this and several other articles as accurate as possible. So don't you go around calling anyone but yourself ignorant. And also: "Please don't write in a provocative manner"? What in the world are you referring to? "Sweetie" and "Honey"? That's simply how I speak and it just so happens that is how I type and write to others as well. Hmph.- Floramage! 04:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be how you type personally, but it's still provocative to others. Please understand that! Voretus 05:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Seriously! CHECK SEREBII.NET!! If we could just follow their updates here, pokelife here would be SOOOO much easier! But, on a less anarchist note, NOOBS! Don't just blatently edit the article, thinking you know it's right! Listen to Aretha, it's called "R-E-S-P-E-C-T"!!!!! >_<—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teh Winrar (talk • contribs) 21:24, 5 April 2007  (UTC)
::Seriously, CHECK RELIABLE SOURCES AND CIVILITY! -`Jeske (v^_^v) 22:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check wikt:blatantly, too. :) – mcy1008 (talk) 00:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arceus, n00b!! 

message: Can we just wait! We don't know if Serebii's right or not!!Sonic,Pikachu,and Snorunt 19:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, we already are waiting.  And it doesn't matter if Serebii is right or not; they won't reveal where they get their information. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please!! 

message: they have video of a guy catchin him in english ver —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.58.202.234 (talk) 22:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But what does that prove?  Bupkus.  Ever heard of a GameShark or other cheat device? -Jeske (v^_^v) 22:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Um. Maybe not Gameshark but there certainly is Action Replay for the DS. Which is also a cheating device. There is no "cheat code option" in the game independently.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 19:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Ranger is the exception.  None of the main games or console games (R/B/Y/G/S/C/Ru/Sa/Em/FR/LG/D/P/Col/XD/Stadium I & II) have cheat-code options. -Jeske (v^_^v) 20:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about the Wonder Mail Generator in Pokemon MD I use it to get all kinds of stuff. -Fear teh Happy! 22:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is PMD a "main game"? -Jeske (v^_^v) 01:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check youtube 

message: its a supposition ,according to the information he created the three then techically he is the leader of the three right? Envy
:Yes Arceus did create Uxie, Mesprit and Azelf. It says so ingame. Mr. Duckie 13:51, May 30 2007 (UTC)
::That does not, however, make him the leader de facto.  For example, one could argue Creationism, but creatures don't often listen to their "creator". -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does it say that?  As I said above, just because he created them doesn't mean he automatically controls them.  Hell, look at Inevitables, the arguments for Creationism, and Robotron: 2084.  Also, please stay civil. -Jeske (v^_^v) 03:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: 'Salright. -Jeske (v^_^v) 20:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arseus  Leader of the  legendary trio? 

message: Shouldn't pictures of all, or at least one of the alternate forms be shown? I have all the sprites btw.(Darkraider9 01:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty crufty, and probably gets very close to violating fair use. I think readers being informed of the fact Arceus can change types depending on its Plate will satisfy most.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 01:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Forms 

message: Was there simply too much data? Were people divided as to a "more valid" possibility? Were there simply no sources whatsoever?
:No sources. -Jeske (v^_^v) 17:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why, Exactly, Was Etymology Removed?

message: I forget where exactly but I ran across another story in-game somewhere that I think referenced Arceus. It was about some guy with a sword who went around cutting up Pokemon and eating them (I'm not joking around it said something like "he feasted on the Pokemon"). But then, a Pokemon spoke to him and punished him or something like that. Is this mentioning Arceus, or another Pokemon?
Also, in Pokemon Battle Revolution, those green spots on it's cheaks appear to "blink" when Arceus blinks. Plus, it does not appear that Arceus has a mouth.
And is the Church/Temple in Hearthome City built to honor Arceus? Because the stained glass window appears to be showing a light atop Mt. Coronet about or above the Spear Pillar. If it is, then that should probably be referenced when describing Arceus as a "diety".
209.240.206.201 02:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally think it's meant to honor either him or the beings he directly spawned. I also doubt the second story intends Arceus; it could very well mention Giratina or any of the Enlightened (Uxie, Agnome, Mesprit). -Jeske (v^_^v) 03:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How strange on the first one I placed in all the Sinnoh legendaries in that story and Darkrai made the most sense... Seeing how that Darkrai vanished to New Moon Isle. -Fear teh Happy! 22:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Story. 

message: According to the Pokemon List to do list, each pokemon should start getting their own page agian. I'll begin deleting the redirect and will put something on the list pointing to the new article. Who knows? Maybe we could get this article to Good or FA. I'll also begin adding the talk page items for most Pokemon article talk-pages. Dylanlip 17:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about reading the Pokemon list for the last few Pokemon. The to-do list on the talk page says to split into seperate articles. If you continue to delete data and information, I will report your activity to the PokeProject. This is a warning. Follow the to-do list. Dylanlip 15:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting

message: Sugimori released Pokémon Platinum promotional artwork for Arceus and it's official, so anyone want to upload one? —WIKIPEDIAN Penguin (♫♫)  23:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art 

message: Hello everybody! with the introduction of Mega Evolutions in Pokémon X and Y, Mewtwo holding a Mewtwonite Y or a Mewtwonite X has higher base stats total than Arceus. Should Arceus still be considered as the strongest Pokémon?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light-x (talk • contribs) 16:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pokemon X and Y (6th Generation) 

message: This page has more information than some of the other existing Pokemon articles.  This species appears to be the creator god of the Pokemon fictional universe and is therefore more notable in-universe than the other species.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviewer note

message: The pronunciation is ar-kee-us, not ar-see-us MysticalWereWolf (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . Speech synthesis software used on the Japanese text would seem to disagree. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2020 

message: Arceus pronunciation is incorrect, you should include other pronunciations like arkeus or arkoose Rishiht (talk) 18:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Per the previous request too... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  20:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2020 

message: Change the pronunciation ar-see-us to ar-kee-us (anime and Pokemon company both pronounce it like that) 173.72.7.206 (talk) 01:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2020 

message: ARK-ee-us to Ark-key-us 2001:4454:561:CD00:E811:4CE:4EB5:2AE3 (talk) 05:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jack Frost (talk) 09:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2020 

message: In line one the pronounciation is listed as "ARK ee us" when it is actually pronounced "Ark oos" as shown in both the pokemon anime, pokemon talk, and the official pokemon reddit as it was changed to mach the more common pronounciation. WillJukes (talk) 11:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the English pronunciation in the show. If you can link to a Japanese pronunciation we can include both of them. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2020 

message: Arceus pronunciation, as per the anime, is Ar-KEY-us 74.101.225.156 (talk) 09:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to the link in the above section. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2020 

message: A new trend that was started by non other than Mandjtv has become extremely popular with Pokemon fans. Some even going to the extent of trying to make it one of the official pronunciations. 
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS KendrickDangah (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources? Pikavoom (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A popularized pronunciation 

message: Remove line from second paragraph of Design and Characteristics section which states "However this is a big misconception. Arceus created its own three worlds. Arceus's world, Palkias world, and finally Dialgas world."  The information is unsourced, seems like original research, and directly contradicts the previous sentence which does have a citation listed. 184.186.197.37 (talk) 20:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . The info was added by an IP (diff). I think they're poking at dimensions in Pokemon. However, I couldn't find an reliable source referencing this or that Arceus actually created the dimensions at all. If anyone has a reliable source, feel free to add it back in. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 12:43, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2020 

message: So the pronunciation has actually varied over the years. In Pokémon Battle Revolution, it was said Ar-SEE-us, but more recently in Arceus and the Jewel of Life, Pokédex 3D Pro and Hoopa and the Clash of Ages, They said Ar-KEY-us. I’m not that good with English pronunciations in grammatical forms. So I was just wondering about that. TheJefMan (talk) 14:41, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't include anything about pronunciations without sources. Juxlos (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pronunciation 

message: Yaviltal (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 09:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2020 

message: Change pronouncement to Ar Koos 2601:249:B00:F1C:599E:C23F:D633:3D26 (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No. That's the romanization of Arceus you see in the first sentence. Also, please get a source of the pronunciation.Crboyer (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2020 

message: BryantM274 (talk) 03:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See above – Thjarkur (talk) 12:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2020 

message: you missed spelled arceus it arcoos 24.142.191.243 (talk) 14:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: see above Cannolis (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2021 

message: It’s arkoos guys 67.243.0.110 (talk) 20:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I 100% agree that it's arkoos and not arkeus or arceus ESWtv (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It’s arkoos not arkeus or arceus