lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Comando Raggruppamento Subacquei e Incursori Teseo Tesei

message: Concerning the 22 December 2005 edits, I apologize if User:Orzetto has memories about some bad WWII event, but I feel that the Decima Flottiglia MAS and its actions are worth being described in detail in Wikipedia. I admit that some Decima Flottiglia Mas men who were in German-held territory after Italy changed sides, were used as anti-partisan forces on land (see Italian commando frogmen#1943), but Decima Flottiglia Mas's role as frogmen using manned torpedoes, and the various frogman traditions that have descended from them in many countries, is important. Anthony Appleyard 08:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Atrocity allegations

message: I removed all the material about Decima Flottiglia MAS and World War II, because it belongs to the specific article Decima Flottiglia MAS, while this article should concentrate on the modern commando frogmen. GhePeU 13:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Decima MAS

message: * The first use of the Italian human torpedo/transport was agianst the Austro-Hungarian Empire. If I recall the Italian that originated the idea was a doctor. The Italians formed a team and executed their plan flawlessly. They destoryed an Austrian battleship in port similair to WW2 British fleet in Alexandra. To bad the Brits did not know their history.
:Italian frogmen men were used to destroy a battleship/dreadnot in an Austrian port similar to the British fleet in Alexadria. Suprizingly the Brits did not know their history. This may be why little is known of Italian frogmen in ww1.
:An excellent article on this can be found at http://www.worldwar1.com/sfvu.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.112.215 (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian Frogmen pre date WW2. They were used in WW1!
Talk:Pledge pin

message: don't move the article, I'll do some research and work on this as soon as I am done with Delta Sigma Phi - Dspserpico 08:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of common file extensions

message: How does one define "common"? There are literally 1,000,000s of applications, some of which may well be specialised software used by millions of people (e.g. any number of accounting packages, any number of programming languages, MATLAB, AutoCAD and literally 100s more). I foresee this list ballooning out of control purely based on the number of popular applications in the world, not to mention that most applications use several different file extensions, not just one. Where do we draw the line on these? There are websites out there which do the job much better than this list ever could. In a nutshell, I suggest this list voluntarily be deleted as unmaintainable. Any thoughts? Zunaid 08:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria
Talk:List of assets owned by CBS Corporation

message: Judging from various sources,the sale of KAUT to The New York Times Company was already completed recently...Ranma9617 08:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dewan Negara

message: This doesn't deserve its own article. joturner 22:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate to use the systemic bias reply, which is overused IMO, but if Senate of Barbados or Senate of Zimbabwe get their own articles, why can't the Malaysian one? If the argument is that the article duplicates some of Parliament of Malaysia's content, well, the article will have to be broken out in the future, making the merge pointless. Johnleemk | Talk 10:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed Good Article

message: Take a look at http://www.senat.fr/senatsdumonde/english/malaisie.html. The similarities aren't an accident. __earth 08:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: NWill moved page "Dewan Negara" to "Senate (Malaysia)" without discussion. Do the regular editors of this article agree or disagree with this move? If there is agreement for the move, then I suggest a further move to "Senate of Malaysia" so the the article name can be linked without piping. If editors prefer the original name, it should be moved back. Ground Zero | t 17:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The move was part of a massive "campaign" which led to NWill being temporarily blocked. As the move was controversial as well as undiscussed, I have reverted it. If anyone thinks there is a case for renaming the article, it should be formalized using the WP:Requested moves process. Favonian (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move
Talk:Napier, New Zealand

message: quote: "There was a swamp between the now Hastings Street and Wellesley Road and the water extended to Clive Square."
This seems unlikely. Houses older than the 1931 earthquake can be found in Nelson Crescent and Vigor Brown street further west than Wellesley Road. A tram track ran down Nelson Crescent before the quake.
My father grew up in a house in Swan street between Hastings Street and Wellesley road. The swamp at that stage was further west, around the current Douglas Mclean Avenue.
If this was true the land must have been reclaimed before the 1931 earthquake.
Is there any evidence of this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.43.195 (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, reclamation started in the 1870s. Nurg (talk) 04:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swamp between Hastings Street and Wellesley Road 

message: I think that it would be good to include the Napier City flag(s) in at least the basic info box, similar to what has been done on the Wellington page.
There are images available online for the flags at e.g. Flags of the World and the Napier City Council website, but I don't have the copyright or permission to upload them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radicuil (talk • contribs) 11:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Could they be public domain?Maria Gemmi (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The flags of Napier appear to be owned by the Napier City Council according to their Emblems and Ensign Policy. I'd suggest someone seek permission to use a low res version, perhaps? Jakoats02 (talk) 05:45, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napier flags 

message: More local pronunciation would be something like NAY-pyə Jakoats02 (talk) 09:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:Wenceslas Square

message: 1) Wenceslas Square is a normal city square founded and designed as a square already in the 14th century. I really don't know why it should be a misnomer when it is a literal translation from Czech where "náměstí" means "city square". 2) There is nothing specially post-Communist about this place, nothing more than about any other place in Prague, the Czech Republic or the whole Central and Eastern Europe; the phrase is meaningless here. 3) Charles Square is twice as large with about 80,500 m². Qertis 08:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Qertis. Thanks for working on the article. I didn't mean to delete the part about it being the second-biggest square. But doesn't it look more like a boulevard than a street? I mean, it's several times longer than it is wide. I know that the Czech word "náměstí" can refer to a square (Jiřiho z Poděbrad), circle (Litochlebské) or even just an important intersection (Strossmeyerovo). It seems to me that while the Czech expression Vaclavské náměstí is no misnomer, the English translation, Wencesclas Square, is a poor one. I also figured that with the Western tourists, businesses, foreign retailers and prostitutes, Wencesclas Square encapsulates the post-revolution era, although I'm not wedded to it if you think that's corny. -- Mwalcoff 22:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous

message: --Hari Menon 14:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new image?
Talk:Messianic Age

message: " Please keep in mind that this topic is not limited to Judaism and Christianity and that this is not specifically about just those two religions. "
The above bold-fonted sentence moved here from the main page. IZAK 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from main page 

message: I feel there is a lot of work required quite badly on this page.
Firstly, the opening paragraph focuses solely on reform Judaism. What is with that? It is quite obvious that the Messianic Age applies to multiple religions, not just reform Judaism.
Perhaps a section of comparative beliefs would be better?
The last paragraph is written rather poorly. This should maybe be the start of a comparitive section of various religions and their beliefs with regard to the topic.
The page as a whole is quite abysmal. Definitely not up to Wikipedia standards
DK
12/01/2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.241.91.216 (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. It's one on a looong list of pages I've been meaning to update.  Please help if you can. nadav 02:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, 10 years later, the page is still pretty terrible. Ashmoo (talk) 12:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work required badly 

message: The article contains this text, "The seventh millennium perforce begins with the year 6000,...."
Actually, the 7th millennium begins at the end of the year 6000, or the first day of 6001. LarryWiki115 (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When does a millenium begin/end?
Talk:The Necklace

message: I recently read this story (in English), and the final sentence quoted in the article, "They had wasted their lives", does not appear in the version I read. Is it accurate? 75.37.49.145 (talk) 04:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I don't recall "They had wasted my keyboard's lives" in the story at all. --75.57.241.114 (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Same here. --71.136.52.205 (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of quotation?
Wikipedia talk:Featured list removal candidates

message: List of UAAP Final Four results should be sent to FLRC. 126.125.94.52 (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of UAAP Final Four results]] 

message: – I was just curious why don't we have a limit requirement for number of nominations at any given time? I see that  has nominated 5 lists for removal—Darwin Medal, Royal Medal, Gabor Medal, Rumford Medal, and Sylvester Medal—all of which are Medals of the Royal Society. These nominations are very correctly made; the lists indeed are problematic. But, the latter four nominations were made within span of 24 hours. I had expressed my interest in fixing up the issues of Darwin Medal, and have made quite a few changes. I do intend to fix these other lists as well, but am not sure if I would be able to do so within a reasonable period of time, given that they all are nominated together.WP:FAR has a limit for nominations of each user by week. Should be have a similar approach? The Featured list removal candidates page is much less active than that WP:FAR. I propose the following requirement:
* Nominator and other relevant Wiki Projects should be notified at-least one week before the nomination is made,
* No more than one nomination per editor per week, and
* No more than three nominations here by the same user at any given times, except if permission taken from the FLC director or a FLC delegate. 
This is just a rough draft, feel free to comment/suggest further requirements. Thanks!– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination limit requirement 

message: I randomly came across List of Texas Tech Red Raiders head football coaches, and noticed that it was a Featured List article. I don't have any pertinent experience with Featured Lists, but just from an intuitive level, it doesn't seem to be anywhere near what I would expect in terms of quality compared to other lists I've read. Would someone with more experience be able to take a look? Yitz (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That list was promoted 12 year ago. Yes, it has uncited text in the lead and (maybe) in the table as well. But apart that, there aren't much issues. The references at a glace look fine. The initial nominator has left Wikipedia. Would you or anyone else like to fix these issues. It is salvageable, but needs work. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential list that doesn't meet criteria 

message: I think List of Golden Martín Fierro Award winners needs looking at as a potential candidate for delisting.
Lankyant (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Golden Martín Fierro Award winners]]
Talk:Digital Transition Content Security Act

message: Can anybody put a date if the bill was passed, defeated or in limbo.
Thanks!
The rapid press (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: passage
Talk:Lord Fanny

message: Is "gay male-to-female transvestite" the correct term?
I highly doubt it. The words "gay" and "straight" are highly subjective when transvestite/transgenders are concerned. I'll think of a more accurate term and then implement it.
OK, if "shi" is a transvestite (as opposed to a full-blown transexual), shouldn't "shi" be described with masculine pronouns, since "shi" is still anatomically a male?
:Is this person a transvestite or a transperson? From my knowledge, a transvestite is a person who gets sexually excited of wearing the clothes of the different sex, although not questioning his gender identity in other ways? Btw, how do you think "shi" should be classified at List of homosexuals and bisexuals in comic fiction? 惑乱 分からん 12:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The character in her "Lord Fanny" persona identifies as a feminine bruja shaman-woman, yes. But biologically the body of Lord Fanny remains male. I don't think that Fanny herself identifies as "Transgendered". Can we open this up for discussion? Gnosis1185 00:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  terminology 

message: Why is this page at "Lord Fanny (comics)", with a redirect from "Lord Fanny"? Isn't the (comics) disambiguation necessary? 惑乱 分からん 11:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: With this character being in the Fictional anarchists category, there should be something in the text of the article justifying the placement. Murderbike (talk) 01:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional anarchist?
Talk:School Certificate (New South Wales)

message: Okay, I hear rumours of the SC's abolition at least once a year, sometimes twice.  So I have attempted to be definitive by adding a section on the McGaw report and the BOS's response thereto.  No abolition is coming, and until the BOS says otherwise, how about we leave it that way? :)  
Johno (talk) 06:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abolition? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Will create a disambiguation page at the base title. Anarchyte (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: School Certificate →  – Not the primary topic; the base title should redirect to List of secondary school leaving qualifications. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Per Happily888's comments. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 16:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Definitely redirect to the list.  It is a generic term.  We (in Africa) call ours "school certificate", as does much of the English-speaking Commonwealth. NSW has no primacy.  Walrasiad (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 May 2023
Talk:Multilingualism

message: The preface contains the sentence "More than half of all Europeans claim to speak at least one language other than their mother tongue; but many read and write in one language.", which seems neither here nor there and kind of nonsensical to begin with.
Maybe someone feels like rephrasing that. 2001:A61:2556:5001:F151:C67B:3FE8:DE1D (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstract 

message: — Assignment last updated by Zesp2026 (talk) 00:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Multilingualism and Language contact

message: The current article text contains:
”Multilingual people can speak any language they write in, but cannot necessarily write in any language they speak.”
Why would people who, by whatever cause or for whatever reason, do not speak one or some of the languages they master through other means, be they writing, signing or reading, excluded from being called multilingual?
I propose to change the text to e.g.:
”Multilingual people can communicate any language they master, but may not be able to communicate in it through all of its modes. Possible modes include speaking, writing, typing, morse-coding, signing, listening, reading, morse-decoding.”
Other modes may exist; I remember having read about a whistling language practised in Türkiye.Redav (talk) 14:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of multilingualism seems (too) narrow
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Neopaganism

message: There's a discussion about moving the article Witchcraft to Witchcraft (classical) and moving Witchcraft (disambiguation) to Witchcraft instead, at Talk:Witchcraft#Requested move 19 July 2023. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 21:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Witchcraft: Requested move 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Gardnerian Wicca  § RfC on Open Letter.  Peaceray (talk) 00:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:Gardnerian Wicca #RfC on Open Letter|Talk:Gardnerian Wicca  §&nbsp;RfC on Open Letter]]
Category talk:Aircraft stubs

message: There are a lot of items here, maybe we should put in more sub-categories - eg. country of origin, era, engine type, etc. --GW_Simulations 10:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Stub-sorting by year is a great idea. Anything to shrink the list down into more manageable chunks. - Emt147 Burninate! 07:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the category Aircraft component stubs be a subcategory of this?  The tag template for that is . FerralMoonrender (MyTalk • MyContribs • EmailMe) 00:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft component stubs
Talk:Dave Swarbrick

message: Is it verified that he went to art college? I always understood that he left school at 15 and was apprenticed as a printer. Bluewave 10:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Attending the Art College was part of his apprenticeship as a Printer for Kynoch Press (ICI) in Birmingham. 51.6.233.66 (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Birmingham College of Art?

message: I am assured that he gave out signed copies of the infamous obituary, but I haven't found a citable source for this yet.
If anyone can manage this, I would be obliged.
TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 08:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Phil. Dave did sell photocopies of his obituary for £1 each at gigs. After his bilateral lung transport and a friendly request from (the culprit) The Daily Telegraph to cease doing this ...he did stop, believing it bad luck or a jinx to continue after this procedure! Jill Swarbrick Swarbanx (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obituary 

message: I've added Swarbrick's albums with Martin Carthy to the discography. I'm not sure why they've never appeared until now but they're clearly deserve to be here. I haven't distinguished between those albums credited to Carthy solo and those credited as being either "with" or "and" Swarbrick. I don't think this is necessary unless the particular albums are discussed in detail in the article. 
And on a related note, I've moved the Rags, Reels and Airs album to the "Solo section" as it's credited to "Dave Swarbrick with Martin Carthy & Diz Disley'" and I think it's largely considered a Swarb solo project, rather than a "collaboration". 
Anyone have any major objections to these edits? Kevin Boyd (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also just noticed that there's no mention of Whippersnapper in the discog - so I added a section. And I moved the English Fiddler album to the "solo" section as this is not a compilation. All (or most) of the tracks have appeared elsewhere previously but these are all newly re-recorded versions so I think it deserves more than just "compilation" status. Thoughts anyone?Kevin Boyd (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography: Martin Carthy releases etc

message: Braka (talk) 17:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairport discography 

message: Whether some albums do ordon't belong in a Discography section for him, the point is, this is one of the most needy articles for a discography page!  If you know someone with the experience to do this, or can yourself, it would be a great kindness to work on that issue.  Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 03:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: On Commons, if there is a need.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabs Blue Labs (talk • contribs) 18:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Photo Available
Talk:Grid Compass

message: Objectified directed by Gary Hustwit that appears at least in the U.S.A published version (Swiss Dots; Plexifilm) to be released in 2009 starting just before the 47:00 minute mark is in the film showing this computer. 68.48.113.58 (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source he talks about this in
Talk:Negima! Magister Negi Magi/Archive 1

message: In Negi's class folder, Takamichi has written under Evangeline's picture:  "Ask her advice if you're in trouble" ("Talk to her if you have any problems" in the Chuang-Yi version) which is an incorrect translation of the original sentence saying "Komatta toki soudan shinasai" ("If in trouble, ask for assistance"). Since Eva is a bitter enemy of Negi who does anything but help him, it is obviously inconsistent. It probably originally meant that if Eva causes trouble, Negi has to request help from the Dean and others (the Dean knows about the wizards).
EDIT: I won't delete everything that had been written here, but I must point out that it was not translated incorrectly. In the anime it referred to this note on the roster in the same way as it had been translated in DelRey's version. 
And it might not be a mistake after all as later in the series Eva does help Negi.
Self contradictory passage. Correct and replace--Tznkai 9 July 2005 17:28 (UTC)
*You know, if COULD be a double-meaning thing. "If in trouble, ask for assistance" can be interpreted both ways. Notice how one of the first things Eva said during all the chaos was "If you talk to Takamichi or the Headmaster about this, your students are going to suffer for it." Following this theory, it's safe to assume that Negi, being more than a little naive, would have assumed that it meant "ask for her if you need help", not the other way around... all in all, it's hard to tell. Wakuseino 01:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Note for Evangeline

message: "The end result was Del Rey's decision to release the book uncensored, but sealed in shrinkwrap to prevent prying eyes. This in turn caused miscontent among manga collectors, as the shrink-wrapping sometimes causes damage to the manga novel."
:Shrink-wrapping is the norm for tankōbons in Japan. Is it different in the States? —Tokek 05:10, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally no, the only shrinkwrapped manga I have bought those marked as for 16+ such as Del Rey's Negima, and I think Tokyopop's Remote may have been as well? Shiroi Hane 04:28, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrink wrap 

message: I've tried to do some tidying up on this section, but I'm not convinced I haven't made it worse.. I think the whole section really needs to be condensed and clarified if not completely re-written. Shiroi Hane 14:05, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Magic Neutralization