Talk:List of battery types

message: Oi! This reads like an advertisement. Please revise:
* Following text removed from article:
The most exciting development in batteries to date is the new silicone battery which is available in the latest Lexola electric road going motorbikes. Based on an electrolyte of liquid low sodium silicate compound, the battery can operate normally in extreme temperatures from -20 deg C to +45 deg C.  The silicone battery has a much higher charge density per kilogram than traditional lead acid batteries, with twice the life (up to 500 full recycles) making this new power pack the most versatile high capacity, high current drain and ecologically friendly battery pack available today. 
The new silicone battery's main advantages are - high capacity, high current output, rapid recharge time, low temperature performance, long life span, and recyclable environment-friendliness. Finally, the most compelling argument to utilise this new battery is its ability to be rapidly re-charged with no long term damage to the battery. The new silicone battery is capable of producing a charge from flat to 90% capacity in less than 2 hours, using our new dual fast charge option providing up to 80km (50m) range per charge from the standard silicone battery pack on the new G2000 electric road motorbike. 
 
**Quotation ends. 88.108.173.118 12:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I see there's no mention of Thin-Film Batteries such as those made by Infinite Power Solutions. Maybe someone could add that?
Likewise Potassium Hydroxide batteries.  The DOT singles them out with specific shipping requirements.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.18.16.11 (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thin-Film Batteries

message: >>  I note that typing the title of this page into the search bar doesn't bring it up, but I don't know how to work the wiki intricacies to fix this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.128.124 (talk) 16:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title search

message: consensus against move
:List of battery types → List of cell types — A battery is simply a pair of cells. This article deals around the specifics of the cells —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.245.90.148 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lead-acid battery which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: A new article Comparison of electrochemical batteries or Comparison of battery types need to be made.
Some coumns to be made include:
*Power density (25°C): in W/kg
*(Theoretic) Energy density (at 25°C): in Wh/kg
* Price
* Life expectancy
* Self-decharge (eg around <5%/month or more) 
This article could eg also mention that lithium-ion batteries are heavily weather-affected (eg they only provide 10% of their power in cold climates (under -30°Celcius).
It should also be mentioned that batteries mostly cannot be created at a environmentally-friendly manner. An extra strain is that lithium-batteries (which are the most used) are made of lithium which is mined in South-America (often without much environmental consideration) -->mention in column environmental rating for production 
PS: I already made an article called Metal-air electrochemical cell with a graph that could prove useful
KVDP (talk) 08:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison of battery types

message: Maxell claims it makes Zinc Manganese batteries which is not listed in the table.  I suspect these are Zinc chloride by another name. Can someone more chemical minded confirm this? 
If so should we add this type as Maxell is a major seller of batteries in the World and people may come to the Wiki to find out about it?
--Quatermass (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zinc Manganese

message: We have an IP hopping editor (who is probably User:RickyGillyJack not logged in) repeatedly adding "Tertiary battery" to the title of the third column of the table.  I have reverted this as nonsense several times, but just to check that I am not mistakenly beating up an inexperienced editor, does anyone disagree that this is not a recognised concept, and even if it is, the table entries are not related to it? SpinningSpark 16:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not familiar to me.  Google Books only turns up one snippet that sounds vaguely related, and the Linden battery handbook is mute on this subject. However, my competence at technical matters has been repeatedly and loudly doubted by the august faculty of this organization, so what does it matter what I think. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you link to the snippet? What does it say?  When I looked at gbooks I mostly got stuff about naval artillery. SpinningSpark 01:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Electrical Review for 1891, volume 28, snippet at  but the term seems extinct otherwise. It's not appropriate in the 3rd column of the table in any case, it's just vandalism. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed this is disruption.  I did not want to be seen to use administrative powers to win an editing dispute, but if there is consensus that this is simply disruption I will take the appropriate action if they return.  The snippet you found appears to be a protologism invented by the author of UK patent GB0000236 which applies only to the patented invention and did not survive beyond 1891.  In fact it probably did not survive the ink drying on the patent. SpinningSpark 14:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, tertiary battery is a real thing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201902340 says that they are a class of rechargeable batteries which recharge by absorbing heat. Erkin Alp Güney 16:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tertiary battery 

message: Is a solar battery considered a type of battery?  I would assume not, what do others think? Vaughan Pratt (talk) 14:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected that article to Rechargeable battery. Batteries charged by solar power can also be charged by other sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not convinced that redirecting is the right thing to do here.  I agree that solar battery is not a type of battery, but it is a battery application, and quite an important one at that.  It is discussed under that name quite extensively in sources.  See this book for instance.  The target article barely touches on this application and certainly does not contain the material that was in the source article. SpinningSpark 12:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the solar battery article before I redirected it, it was essentially a coat rack for all sorts of rechargeable battery descriptions. At a minimum, it would need a nuke and rewrite, but if solar batteries are inherently rechargeable, the material could start as a section of this page and then be forked to its own article if size justifies the split. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar battery 

message: i think this is chemical-electric batteries - the term battery has also been broadly applied to gravity battery and I do not think that fits in this list. if we make it more specific, confusion will be avoided.MfortyoneA (talk) 18:42, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No. We go with the common names of things. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

text: I'm against a name change.  Sure, there are other things called batteries, but we don't need to disambiguate chicken battery farms either. SpinningSpark 22:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  can we make the title more specific,