Talk:Glossary of machine vision

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: :Image:USB.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:USB.png

message: :Image:Logo firewire125.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo firewire125.png

message: after browsing this page, i thought it best to 'include my two' re: the above mentioned points
first, i believe it is pixelization, as opposed to pixelation, even though firefox's spell-check is flagging them both for me. no ? i could be wrong. it's just a gut feeling i've got.
that being blurted out on my part, i can't help but notice a missing element i feel is essential to comprehensively defining this concept.
digital images, analogue photographs, 25/30 fps video, 24fps film, etc., even paint on canvas, all create an OPTICAL ILLUSION of the result desired by the author/artist/creator.
move too close, and the effect suffers. too far and the impact weakens. for dynamic media, too slow and your vision can begin to perceive the individual frames.
so, working with your current text ...
Pixelation. In computer graphics, pixelation is an effect
 that negatively distorts the intended believability of the optical illusion of that image
caused by displaying a bitmap or a section of a bitmap at such a large size that individual pixels, small single-colored square display elements that comprise the bitmap, 
 show themselves as such, and in abandoning their support of the original optical illusion,
are visible to the eye,
 or at such a small size that inherent limitations of the display mechanism serve to generate unwanted artifacts from individual
 elements that were never intended to blend, suddenly forcing results that might confuse viewers.
next; there is an entry for s-video (y/c), but not for composite or component sources, let alone any of the emerging digital standards.
i understand we're all busy. i wanted to assist lest these were accidental omissions. i'll  respectfully leave implementing any of this mess to those who've cared enough to take things this far, and offer my thanks for their willingness
````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.226.47 (talk) 15:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  two suggestions for improvement - pixelization & component/composite video methods 

message: *
:Northamerica1000(talk) 09:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Find sources

message: I guess somebody first added ISO, intending to reference light sensitivity of film, before ISO the copyright mob of standards decided to turn it into a shameless plug.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.181.240 (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what your argument is. ISO 9000 is somewhat related to machine vision , though I imagine in a 'glossary of terms' article it should really just say what ISO stands for and what that is and maybe a couple of machine vision specific standards.
--Carbon Rodney 06:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Those two links are advertisements that those two vision companies received ISO certification for their own operations.   That really doesn't show a relationship between the topics. North8000 (talk) 11:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO 9000? has nothing to do with machine vision 

message: We wanted to learn all these terms in a flashcard format so we built one and made it freely available. Thought it would be helpful for anyone who wanted to learn the content of this glossary in a flashcard format like Anki to also be able to discover that they exist and have access to it from the source.
Was going to suggest it to be added in an external links section like the following but as it is linking to our own site, following the instructions of the Wikipedia guidelines, thought it would be best to leave this in the talk page for other contributors to see if it would be relevant or see if there was a better place/format to put it
*Flashcard version of the Wikipedia Glossary of machine vision in an Anki-readable format
Darigov Research (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Flashcards link