Talk:Veilside

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Veilside → VeilSide — Official website states the S of company name in uppercase, not in lowercase —Willirennen 22:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
Oppose
Per WP:CAPITAL#Mixed_or_non-capitalization, when companies use eccentric capitalization in their names, we should follow the the lead of outside sources that write about them, and use the most common form. I did not find any references to this company in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, but I notice that in a Google search, the name is more often spelled 'Veilside' rather than 'VeilSide'. So I suggest we *do not* do the move. EdJohnston 16:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
* I don't think there's any need for discussion; just do it. -- Mikeblas 23:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 19:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
Oppose
Per WP:CAPITAL#Mixed_or_non-capitalization, when companies use eccentric capitalization in their names, we should follow the the lead of outside sources that write about them, and use the most common form. I did not find any references to this company in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, but I notice that in a Google search, the name is more often spelled 'Veilside' rather than 'VeilSide'. So I suggest we *do not* do the move. EdJohnston 16:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
* I don't think there's any need for discussion; just do it. -- Mikeblas 23:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 19:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Amazingly, three different projects have "claimed" this article. As far as I can tell, they've done nothing else to edit the article. I've assessed the article as low importance because the company isn't very large in sales or employment, and as stub quality because it's very short, poorly formatted, and has no third-party references at all. -- Mikeblas 15:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessments