lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:George C. Nichopoulos

message: This article has been classified as a start. It still needs work on referencing. Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Classified as a start

message: I've been looking for reliable references that support the statement "The character Dr Nick Riviera in the animated sitcom The Simpsons, voiced by Hank Azaria, is a parody of Nichopoulos", with no results. It may well be true... But as it's quite libellous, I'm deleting it. If anyone ever finds a good source, feel free to add it again. F (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Nick Riviera

message: "Although Nichopoulos retained his medical license after Presley’s death, the Tennessee Medical Board permanently revoked Nichopoulos’s license in light of his practice of overprescribing to many patients over multiple years." That seems to contradict itself --The Vital One (talk) 02:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to comment on this exactly. 189.217.192.124 (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify
Talk:United Nations General Assembly resolution

message: A decision is an alternative format to a resolution. The disctinction is unclear to me and this should be discussed in this article. In this context I offer the following quote by Alfred Webre on his radion show Exopolitics Radio on March 22, 2008 (time ca. 0:05:00):
I can also add another quote from that same radio show from Michael Salla (time: 0:29:00):
 
Having made a couple of futile searches for the original documents of the above decision, it appears to me that Webre's assertion may have some merit (i.e. not on the actions of the US with regard to this specific decision, but on the added obfuscation this distinction makes). __meco (talk) 12:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I try since years to find this obscure Resolution [A/DEC/33/426] or maybe [A/33/426] from 1978 but the UN don't know anything about this and you find only transcripts via obscure alien-friends-websites. Anybody know a link to the originial? In the meantime it looks to my like ta hoax -- Hartmann Schedel II (talk) 13:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Nations General Assembly decision 

message: There is a split discussion in progress on Talk:List of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine, which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  GreyShark (dibra) 19:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Split discussion in progress
Talk:The Da Vinci Code (soundtrack)

message: The article contains many phrases which imply POV. For example; May 9th was a great day for soundtrack lovers; many of whom were eagerly waiting to pick up film scores released that day.—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 08:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: This doesn't seem like a legit source to be quoting considering he's the one who chose the composer and oversaw film's music's application to the film. 
09:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Response includes opinion of the movie's director???
Talk:Tommie Sunshine

message: I just started this page, since I have loved every song I've heard that is labeled with "(Tommie Sunshine Remix)" and I'm a bit of a n00b, so I invite people to help me develop this. I found info at these sources:    -- DJ Phaz3r 08:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting This Article 

message: I would like to create a Remixography section to let people know of the majority of the works Tommie has done. It would basically be a copy of what's on the official website. I have two options for this; I could create a list of only the more "well known" songs, or do a complete one. The problem with the first would be determine what is "well known," so I'm considering the second. Does anyone else support this idea? Would it be okay to copy the list (as far as copyright issues)? Please leave your input if you happen to see this talk page.
--DJ Phaz3r 09:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Remixography section 
Talk:Facing the Truth (TV programme)

message: The article says he was "not directly responsible, having been withdrawn from the operation after planning it."
I thought he drove the car while a younger person fired the gun, isn't that correct?
Aaron McDaid (talk - contribs)  08:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsibility for Hackett's killing 
Talk:White-lipped snail

message: I always thought that two different species could not mate together, and produce fertile offspring? So how can grove snails be considered a different species if they can mate together. -Neil.
:The article merely states that they can reproduce, not that the offspring are fertile. --Stemonitis 07:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, could somebody state that if they have the evidence. Would remove a glaring inconsistency. GrahamBould 20:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species
Talk:Coetus Internationalis Patrum

message: Is there any contemporaneous record of Coetus Internationalis Patrum?  That is, any articles written by it or about it during its period of activity?  Is there any mention of this, anywhere, prior to 1995?
There's no information supporting its existence in the links, which are merely links to SSPX home pages. patsw 13:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporaneous Record
Talk:31st Infantry Division (United States)

message: Later the entire division except Tanks flew to Texas to conduct largest manuever ever held in US  ...Fought *82nd." again. The largest amada of A/C ever assembled to fly that many troops ...in about a 24 hour period.  This Division was the only US Army oufit allowed to wear Class A ..Bloused boots  and Light blue Ascots. This made the Airborne troops unhappy!!!!  After the Texas Manuever...the Division was relocated to Camp Atterby.      Bill Sebastian  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:9FC0:47:AC80:6780:3318:1C90 (talk) 18:30, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  more details about the 31st division during the years 1951-1952.  Division was stationed at Fort Jackson for about one  and a half years . conducted major manuevers at Camp Mc Call "fought the 82nd Airborne. Then started training as the first Air mobility
Talk:Acanthurus achilles

message: — Assignment last updated by Dr Alyssa MacDonald (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology
Talk:33rd Infantry Division (United States)

message: I ask because this is most likely a brigade.  Namely the 33rd brigade combat team (meaning more than just infantry), part of the 35th Infantry Division. I believe this is an inaccurate article and should be deleted.  Here is the article that covers this unit more accurately (source: I served in the 33rd BCT): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33rd_Infantry_Brigade_Combat_Team_(United_States) WatneyScience (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, historically there appears to have been a divisional level formation that was designated the 33rd, however, they no longer exist. In this regard, there are probably two options: (1) merge and redirect this article into the 33rd Brigade Combat Team article, or (2) keep two separate articles, which more clearly delineate the two. I have had a go at doing some work in order to more clearly delineate the two, but it probably requires someone with a better knowledge of the US Army than I. My opinion is that the second option would probably be the best, given that it seems that 33 BCT has a pretty convoluted lineage (e.g. involving the disbandment of the 33rd Bde, and then the renaming of the 66th Bde (from the 44th Div) to become the new 33rd Bde etc.) and the notability of the division during World War I and II as outlined by Teri and AC below. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I advocate for keeping two separate articles.  The 33rd Infantry Division (as a Division) was notable during World War II. TeriEmbrey (talk) 13:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, separate articles makes sense. The 33rd Division is notable on its own for its service in World War I and II as evidenced by the significant coverage it has received in multiple reliable sources. Anotherclown (talk) 12:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this a division?
Talk:36th Infantry Division (United States)

message: Why isn't there any mention of the 36th Infantry in Kirshgoens Germany and the dates they were there? I myself was in the 2nd BN. 36th Infantry 3rd AD from 1982-1984.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.248.109 (talk) 16:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  36th Infantry in Germany 

message: Training and Readiness Oversight for the 35th and 36th Divisions is incorrect.  The 45th Brigade (OKARNG) falls under 36th ID for TRO and 39th Brigade (ARARNG) falls under 35th ID.  At least part of this diecision was based on teh hisotrical connection between the Oklahoma and Texas National Guards.AUSA Torchbearer Report, December 2005
 AUSA Torchbearer Report, December 2005 Unfortunately I have no indpendent, publically available documentation to support this.   I am a member of the 45th BCT.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RTO Trainer (talk • contribs) 15:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRO Information is out of date 

message: Is there any? 1836 was the year of Texas's independence from Mexico.  Is there any information about the selection of "36" for the Army division's designation? 66.64.59.66 (talk) 14:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of the number "36" 

message: MG Aris was fired 3/17/22 by Texas Governor Greg Abbott. New temp commander is BG Win Burkett. Army Times Article. Info needs to be updated in article with article cited above.  — MrDolomite • Talk 02:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 April Change of Commander
Talk:Broca's Brain

message: The publishing on Broca'Brain to Ballantine in 1974 has to be checked.
The official publishing is 1979 to Random House, paperback and hard cover editions.
This second date is compatible with the criticism of Robert K.Temple's book "The Sirius Mystery" by Carl Sagan. His criticism could not be done in 1974 if Temple's book was only released end 1975... Please cross-check your data twice before publishing them.
-- I checked for you. It is well 1979. Ballantine reprinted it in the next years.
-------
:I've got a copy here.  Definitely published 1979 (says so in the book search).  Some of the material in it (maybe even the title essay) appeared in 1974, which might explain the confusion.Goatchurch (talk) 22:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Check publishing
Talk:Mad Catz

message: http://en.tritton-tech.com/about_complex.aspx?FId=n1:1:1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.170.45.37 (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tritton is now independent
Talk:Jindabyne (film)

message: I have deleted a screenshot of the movie. It is really difficult to argue that this is fair use when the movie poster is sufficient for the purposes of identification. So in line with the non-free content policy, the image has to go. Pascal.Tesson 21:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of fair use image
Talk:Adult standards

message: Why is "Adult Standards" capitalized throughout this article? I note that it's not capitalized in the title. Is it a proper noun? Why? -- Mikeblas 10:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I've removed the links to individual radio stations from the external links. The second paragraph estimates 200 stations with this format, so we can't hope to list them all, and if we did they should be wikilinks.
Also, I think the list of artists is getting a bit too long, but I'm less sure how to handle that.
— Electrolite 05:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists
Talk:Jack Ford (journalist)

message: An IP keeps trying to add the following language in a separate section:
The edits have been reverted a number of times, by me and by another editor. The information is trivial, inappropriate - it doesn't belong in the article. I have placed a warning on the IP's Talk page. If for some reason the IP wants to discuss the change, s/he can come here.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan website
Talk:Beretta M12

message: I do not understand why you have taken off the link to the italian page, that I am completing. Changes must be expalined, don't you think? --Mossasgargiula 11:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian link

message: I have to say that the PM 12 page should be merged with this page.--Paulwharton 2:54, 07 April 2007(UTC)
:support merge. Chris 08:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: support merge. Ominae 05:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge, it just looks like an eraly prottype of this weapon and doesnt warrant its own page(ForeverDEAD 16:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:British United Airways

message: I have added a small explanation drawing readers' attention to the fact that the Hunting Group, including its parent the Clan Line, were already owned by B&C at the time of the merger with Airwork. I felt it was important enough to warrant its inclusion in this section of the article as it makes it clearer to readers why B&C acquired such a dominant position among the airline's shareholders. On a different note, I have also removed the expansion of B&C where it was repeated. It has already been explained in the intro. I have furthermore added another page no. to the relevant reference where more info can be found on BUA's success in reversing years of losses on the South American routes it had acquired from BOAC.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.194.221.231 (talk) 13:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisiting referenced info

message: How reliable as an independent source is "Thomson, Adam (1999). High Risk: The Politics of the Air. London, UK: Sidgwick and Jackson. ."?
Thomson was the head of Caledonian which took over BUA, and thence head of the resulting British Caledonian. This puts him a bit too close the action and there is a possibility of that his re-telling of the history is biased. It would be better if where used, this source actually attributes statements (as opinion) to Thomson. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Source reliability
Talk:Webley–Fosbery Automatic Revolver

message: I added the infobox requested.  These were the specifications listed at the bottom of the page; just incase I missed anything, or anyone'd like to see the original spec "box".
:==Specifications==
:* Type: Automatic Revolver
:* Caliber: .455 Webley (or .455 British Service) and .38 ACP
:* Action: Recoil
:* Country Of Origin: UK
:* Designer: George V. Fosbery
:* Length: 280 mm (11")
:* Mass: 1.24 kg (2.73 lbs) unloaded
:* Capacity: 6 rounds (.455), 8 rounds (.38)
:* Sights: blade (front), U-notch (rear)
:* Barrel: 152 mm (6"), .455 Service Pattern
:* Rifling: 7 grooves, rh
:* Production Dates: 1901-1915
:* Production: 4750
:71.235.66.254 17:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

message: ... seen in the opening scene of Zardoz? I seem to recall Connery picking up what appeared to be a standard Webley, gripping it overhand by the barrel, and cocking it by sliding the mechanism rearward. Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahhh, I see that it is... Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the gun... 

message: The gun that was used to kill Sam Spade’s partner, Miles Archer in the film The Maltese Falcon. 68.195.115.202 (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:J.Lo by Jennifer Lopez

message: "Lopez told a radio D.J. she was open to being educated on the topic. It also seems that she is starting to wear fake fur instead of real fur."  Could we get a reference for this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falc (talk • contribs) 11:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need reference for this statement 
Talk:Mat Jarvis

message: Personally I think they are both valid, as they have major differences.  
As long as they have links to each other, you can either chose to read about 'Gas' in more detail (and will become more detailed as more people add to it), or 'Mat P Jarvis', which also has details about other projects he is involved in.
It also stops the pages becoming too long, breaking them into smaller chunks.  
Thanks
Mike  :-)
*Its the same guy, so I disagree that there are "major differences" that can't be discussed in a single article.  Centralized content makes it much easier to edit information on both subjects at the same time.  As it is now, there is a lot of duplicated content.  When the article approaches 40k or so, then we'll talk about splitting the article up.  It would be like having two separate articles for Prince and The Artist Formerly Known as Prince - sure they're different names and did different music, but it was still the same guy.  I'll put in a request at WP:THIRD to get an additional opinion if you would like to here what another editor thinks.  Wickethewok 13:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mariano José de Larra

message: I have deleted what author of article said about the gift, the famous novel written by Larra, of spanish princess "Leti" to her beloved sweety little prince...  I think that cannot be considered an influence: is more a fact of a stupid celebrity magazine than a thing to be in an article of a worthy enciclopedia. If that was an influence, please write there too that my brother bought to me the Larra journalistic articles in book the wondergul Austral Espasa edition (with prologue of Azorín). The rest of the article is great, congratulations. NPOV  Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.8.20.66 (talk) 03:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi there

message: The writer of the article is certainly correct in stating that Larra was a great prose writer, but the greatest of the 19th century?! Many would argue that Alas, with all his writings was the greatest, or another of the realist/naturalist writers. Also, I question the notion that he would be accepted as one of the greats in any culture or era. Larra does not capture the World Literature audience the way Cervantes or Lorca does; because of this use of peacock words, I have commented out the last paragraph. Galdos (talk) 01:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Refrased Krenakarore TK 14:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Point of view

message: I might add the word "nonfiction" before "prose writer" and I heartily agree that Galdós, Unamuno, <<Clarín>> (Leopoldo Alas), Ganivet, Ortega y Gasset at least rival (if not eclipse)the writings of Larra. Additionally, you really can't talk about Larra without at least the mention of the influence of Montesquieu's Les Lettres Persanes (especially considering Larra's afrancesado status). Just a couple of references. --Tjprinkey (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prose writer
Talk:Labialization

message: A plain Labialization is ◌ᵝ (rare), while a Labial(-velar)ized with protrusion is ◌ʷ, and a protruded without labialization is ◌ꟹ. Is there a symbol of Labialized with protrusion but without velarization? 146.96.36.47 (talk) 03:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA
Talk:USA Sevens

message: The "results by year" table currently shows the teams that finished 1st and 2nd (Cup final), and the teams that finished 5th and 6th (Plate final). Would it be better to delete the 5th and 6th placed teams and replace them with the 3rd and 4th placed teams? The team that finished 3rd is more significant than the team that finished 5th. I don't think there is room in the table for all six teams to be shown, because the table would be quite crowded and squished. Barryjjoyce (talk) 03:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Results by year
Talk:John C. H. Lee

message: This is a good start article, but it needs a date of birth and death. The article indicates 1958 as the year of death. --TGC55 14:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth & death needed 

message: This page is really choppy and poorly done.  It says in two different places that Lee was made Deputy Commander of the ETO, for example. Jhobson1 11:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write needed 

message: Hi Hawkeye, Can you pls check these...
*"laid out in the Field Service Regulations Brigadier General Donald A. Davison to command..." - missing 'and with' before General?
*:Re-written.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooops.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tweaks
Talk:Brigade general

message: i dont see any specific reference to any US brigade general at all. anybody terribly mind if i remove the catagories 'Military ranks of the United States Army | Military ranks of the United States Air Force | United States Marine Corps ranks'?
-Lordraydens 10:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: During its entire 11-year existence, no single reference has been provided to show that brigade general is 'a modern alternative to a previous older rank of brigadier or brigadier general'. I don't think there is a difference between the two.
*In fact, 'brigade general' doesn't even have an entry in the Oxford English Dictionary, whereas brigadier general does. Maybe it's just someone's inept translation from another language to English.
*To further prove this is just the same thing, look at the interwikis. Wikidata linked 43 other language projects to the English entry 'brigadier general', who all either say something like 'brigadegeneral' or 'brigadir general'. However, this 'brigade general' article still hasn't got a Wikidata page. Its 12 interwikis are still manually linked to other language entries, all of which overlap with the 43 linked to 'brigadier general' through Wikidata. This is strong evidence of duplication that hasn't been removed yet. 
*And on French Wikipedia, it says 'Général de brigade, brigadier-général ou brigadier' are all just synonyms.
*Finally, if both articles claim Charles de Gaulle as a brigadier general and brigade general, you know you're talking about the same rank.
So unless someone can provide evidence they're really really actually different, this article should be merged into brigadier general. (I doubt there will be much that isn't already in the latter). Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I entirely agree. These articles on slightly different national variations of what is essentially the same rank should be merged. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

text: I agree. Pdfpdf (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Brigadier general]]
Talk:Paracorophium

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem