lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Word problem for groups

message: I thought Novikov published his paper in 1952, not 1955, as mentioned in the article. "On algorithmic unsolvability of the word problem", Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 85, 1952, pp.709-712. At least this is the reference that gets propagated, I never read the paper itself.
Betacastelli (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  comments 

message: I think we need a more general page for "word problem" because word problems exist in frameworks other than groups.
For example, there is a "word problem for free lattices".--Malcohol 11:48, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to start something like this at word problem (mathematics). Please improve it or let me know what you think! Best wishes, Cambyses 13:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word problems for other theories. 

message: It would be nice to actually have an example of a group with a finite presentation which does have unsolvable word problem. Is it possible to give an understandable example or are these too hard for the article? - Saibot2 10:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One pseudo-explicit example given, references to a few other pseudo explicit examples given, and one explicit example given.  I think Turing, Markov, and Post had 2 or 3 examples that are both foundational and easy to explain *why* they are examples.  This is not my field, so it is not easy for me, but perhaps someone can cover these important examples. JackSchmidt (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  example for unsolvable word problem? 

message: mentioned in Andrey Markov (Soviet mathematician)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.6.66.38 (talk) 16:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: word about semi-groups
Talk:Von Neumann conjecture

message: Details of the recent work, please! Charles Matthews 06:28, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: So I have found that Sapir and Olshanskii in 2000 constructed a first finitely-presented counterexample. But the first counterexample might be much older (Olshanskii 1980)? Charles Matthews 07:02, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite correct - the first counterexample (Tarski monster) was indeed due to Ol'shanskii in 1980, and it is only the fp weakening of the conjecture that is "recent". I've added something on the history, and corrected the misleading impression I gave in Thompson groups. Best wishes, Cambyses 20:08, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent work

message: Standard Wikipedia behaviour is to place references inline, that is, as close as practical to the point they support.  This article is already informative, but would be even better if the references it gives were moved into the body of the text in the standard way.
Supposing I can make time to do so, I will make these changes.  However, if at least two weeks have gone by since I posted this note, don't let my good intentions stop you from doing it anyway!  yoyo (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned change: move references inline
Talk:Financial economics

message: I've begun attempting to clean up some of the worst unencyclopedic, unverified, and unintelligible content on the page. Once it is in straightforward, well-cited shape, I expect to propose a merge of this page with Finance, which is indistinguishible from the content and sourcing of this page. SPECIFICO talk 15:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Finance is the application of the principles of financial economics to an inter-related set of monetary problems."
This was then changed (see Talk:Finance#Lead section); the consensus was that "finance" is not just a branch of economics / academia but rather and mainly a "real life" everyday activity (and problem) for most adults.
I'm leaning towards the latter view (see also above re the NSF).
Fintor (talk) 09:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Preparing to request merge

message: Hi gents. 
You might be interested here that the finance article historically lead as follows: 
:"Finance is the application of the principles of financial economics to an inter-related set of monetary problems."
This was then changed (see Talk:Finance#Lead section); the consensus was that "finance" is not just a branch of economics / academia but rather and mainly a "real life" everyday activity (and problem) for most adults.
I'm leaning towards the latter view (see also above re the NSF).
Fintor (talk) 09:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: some history
Talk:Thompson groups

message: Trying to trace the source of the statement about the Von Neumann conjecture.
Charles Matthews 06:33, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: conjecture

message: Please note that J. Moore no longer claims that F is amenable:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2063
"Over the weekend of September 29-30, 2012, Azer Akhmedov pointed out a serious error in Lemma 4.13. This error appears to be both serious and irreparable. I therefore withdraw my claim of a proof that F is amenable".
T.K.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.216.103 (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: We don't know
Talk:James Fergusson

message: I have presumed that the Privy Council member as of 1868, Governor of South Australia 1869-1873, the Governor-General of New Zealand 1873-1874, and the UK Postmaster General 1891-1892, all named Sir James Fergusson (1832-1907), are in fact the same person.  They all link to this page   --Chuq 06:51, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like you're right - http://www.maybole.org/notables/fergusson/sirjames.htm --ScottDavis 07:56, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Archduke Charles, Duke of Teschen

message: This article is missing its country. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) it needs to be included. See also Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria for further reference. Gryffindor 15:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. JenLouise 02:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is not Generalfeldmarschall a permanent ("life-long") rank? --Anglius 02:47, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ''At the end of the campaign the archduke gave up all his military offices.''

message: This infobox, besides looking like a gaudy wine label, doesn't have any practical use in the biography. It's a bit silly (and not at all reverent) to address an Austrian archduke in English, especially when he has been in his tomb for a long time. I'm going to remove it, as (for instance) happened on the King Christian VIII of Denmark page. Glatisant (talk) 11:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Monarchical Styles Infobox

message: There is a lack of neutrality throughout this article. 
A few examples: The caution which the archduke preached so earnestly in his strategic works, he displayed in practice only when the situation seemed to demand it.
Even more so: He was at the same time capable of forming and executing the most daring offensive strategy, and his tactical skill in the handling of troops, whether in wide turning movements, as at Würzburg and Zürich, or in masses, as at Aspern and Wagram, was certainly equal to that of any leader of his time, with only a few exceptions., and His campaign of 1796 is considered almost faultless. That he sustained defeat in 1809 was due in part to the great numerical superiority of the French and their allies(...)". --Lubiesque (talk) 18:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the kind of writing typically found in Wikipedia articles when portions have been copied more or less verbatim from older texts, often the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, from an era when it was common for historians, often experts in the field, to blend factual reporting with prevalent assessment. FactStraight (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of neutrality 

message: When the National Congress of Belgium voted for the first time on a King (3 february 1831), he got 35 votes in the first round and 21 in the second round.-- Bancki (talk) 06:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election of a King of the Belgians (1831)
Talk:Evolutionary biology

message: — Assignment last updated by Alec4465 (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics

message: The lead section is clear and concise, not overly detailed, but grasping the main points of the article in an easy to understand manner.Kacasti6 (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Section 

message: Would adding a section about key papers (ie. Galapagos finch work done by the Grants) be beneficial? --AccidentalHerpetologist (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further sections
Talk:Regatta

message: At the moment, this is just a dicdef, but I guess it could be an encyclopedia topic... -- Jmabel 08:06, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expanding

message: DenverG 12:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cowes - oldest regatta? 

message: I've just added this
:Emily Carr, who grew up in the early days of Victoria, British Columbia, descibes a regatta in which the Indian races were the highlight. The canoes, of ten paddlers and a steersman acting as cox, "flash[ed] through their races like running fire."  The Kloochman ("wife" in Chinook Jargon) was "an even grander race" than the men's, with the women giving "every scrap of themselves to the canoe", working in complete unityThe Book of Small, Emily Carr, 1942. Several reprints. Chapter: "Regatta".
to Pacific Northwest canoes. There is a whole (short) chapter entitled "Regatta" in Carr's memoir. Might be useful if anyone wants to expand this article. BrainyBabe (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regatta in early Canada 

message: You should know about this and comment.  One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 12:11, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion [[Category talk:Yachting races]]
Talk:Vihuela

message: So who's active here, who are the top-dogs, who's baby-sitting this page, who want's to know who I am before I start making some edits and additions? I've recently been editing the Viol page (viola da gamba or vihuela de arco) and I decided to come have a look at the vihuela page.  I think some work is needed. Anonymity might be nice, but, here's my web site section (6 huge pages) on early vihuela, both plucked and bowed (you really can't know one without knowing the other, btw).  I'll wait a day or two to see if anyone responds here before I start editing. I have tons of iconography to select from as well (as you'll see at my web site). Thanks Cyclocifra 05:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some house cleaning -- lots of little edits are needed 

message: "While the Mexican vihuela shares the same name as an ancient Spanish plucked string instrument, the two have little to do with each other, and they are not closely related."  Thus begins the article on the Mexican vihuela.  How anyone could read this lead sentence and think the two should be merged is beyond me.71.218.34.228 (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Mexican Vihuela? 

message: "Kahlil Gibran" should link to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahlil_Gibran_(sculptor)
Please correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.53.112.185 (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 
Talk:Prospero Alpini

message: I've (temporarily) removed this contribution from User:Gillo as it does not appear to be currently verifiable (see User talk:Gillo). Hopefully the information will be published soon and we can return it to the article. — Matt 08:57, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sexual theorist

message: I added an infobox, but unfortunately this made placing the other picture on the page very difficult. I've added this to an image gallery temporarily, until the article is increased in length to allow the full image to be placed without looking out of place. Timichio (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner

message: Take it away, boys. 2804:D4B:7924:6B00:7CF4:20A3:5476:3386 (talk) 07:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New incident 

message: Hello. Sorry I'm not much of a wikipedia editor so I thought I'd note down the error I spotted. In the Specification section for the 787-10 the MTOW is listed as "560,000 lb / 250,000 kg". But 560,000 lb would be 254,000 kg. So one of the figures is presumably wrong? TakeFlight (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The weight in pounds is converted to kilograms using Template:Convert, which by default returns the converted value with the same number of significant figures as is used in the initial value.  "560,000 lb" has two significant figures, thus the template returns "250,000 kg" which is rounded to include the same number of significant figures. - ZLEA T\C 21:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum takeoff weight
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (verbs)

message: I think the person who wrote this meant the gerund form. For example, nouns like "talking", "drinking" and "pilfering" are gerunds. If I hear no objections in a week or so, I'll edit it in, and add some examples. arj 09:43, 18 May 2004 (UTC)

message: Is there any need for this page? If all we're going to say is that we prefer the gerund, then we can say that on the main naming conventions page (and we do: WP:NC#Name construction). The same applies to WP:Naming conventions (adjectives).--Kotniski (talk) 08:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Doing this then.--Kotniski (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant?
Talk:List of aircraft engines of Germany during World War II

message: I'm going to change the links on this page, using common names instead of the RLM designations. Even the RLM didn't use them, and no one will ever look for "9-601", although they are already linked to DB601.
Maury 12:06, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Common link names instead of RLM ones

message: For the record: I changed the title to conform with other articles, like List of aircraft engines. Part wording, part removal of mid-title capital letters, as per Wikipedia std. --Wernher 12:10, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for title change
Talk:Pinales

message: "merge Pinophyta" - done; there was no content not already in Pinophyta - MPF 14:44, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your change. That proposal is silly. There is always a need to have articles on higher orders in taxonomy.  Merging would only make sense if there was one class, one order, one family, and one genus. That much of the content is elsewhere is beside the point. Your proposal seems to be going in the direction of having just one article on everything about conifers, when there could and should be dozens - Marshman 17:17, 19 May 2004 (UTC)

message: After [this Google Search|http://www.google.com/search?q=order+taxales&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&start=10&sa=N], I could not come up with definate dates.  I therefore gave a disclaimer to wrap it up.  Please post any contradictory evidence.Willy625 (talk) 03:10, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for removing vague 

message: Should the scope of this article be split per the classification in Christenhusz (2011) --Kevmin § 00:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Split? 
Talk:Tony Randall

message: This article appears to qualify as at least Start Class. I have made this change for the Oklahoma project. Bruin2 (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class

message: "Vo Vo De Oh Doe" was not Randall's only album.  See also "Warm & Wavery" - http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2011/05/tony-randall-warm-and-wavery-mp3s.html   Asat (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: He did the voice of R.U. Humerus in the Magic School Bus episode "The Magic School Bus Flexes Its Muscles" (season two, episode two), but it isn't listed anywhere in the article. 24.175.250.148 (talk) 03:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic School Bus
Talk:Release (Pet Shop Boys album)

message: Is it just me, or does anyone else think this album was worse than the previous ones? The songs don't sound like disco music any more, instead like whiny romance songs you'd expect from the likes of Take that or New kids on the block. 8:28, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The album 
Talk:Ned Leeds

message: What does "retconned" mean? --Tagishsimon
:Subsequent stories rewrote the information. In this case it was a limited series entitled "Hobgoblin Lives", about 8 years ago now. Timrollpickering 01:40, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Retcon

message: Ned Leeds was the main suspect when the Green Goblin's identity was still a secret
Is there any evidence for this? It's been a while since I've read the stories but I can't recall much that really pushed Leeds as a suspect - the only suspect investigated (and cleared) was Frederick Foswell. It does, however, seem likely he was Ditko's choice (see the quote on Green Goblin) but I think someone may have over extrapolated the details on the Spidey Kicks Butt article at http://www.spideykicksbutt.com/SquanderedLegacy/SquanderedLegacyPart1.html Timrollpickering (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main suspect 

message: As others have pointed out in this discussion page, it is misleading to have Ned Leeds' in the Hobgoblin attire as his main article photo, given that he was not the main Hobgoblin (Roderick Kingsley was). I propose we replace that picture with a different one that highlights his position as a Daily Bugle employee.
Quirky-artist-charlie (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2017 (PST)
I just wanted to acknowledge that the image was changed in July 2019. Thank you! Quirky-artist-charlie (talk) 05:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacement for main article picture

message: One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC). 
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 1. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image deletion nomination(s) 

message: Why is the listing for No Way Home a synopsys of the entire movie instead of focus on the Ned character? 24.32.230.242 (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  MCU movies
Talk:Sebastián de Belalcázar

message: THhe great page I just read was over soperb it was tremendase thank you were great SassySammie
The link at the bottom is dead. You might want to remove it... Arska  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.197.214.4 (talk) 10:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Banjo-Kazooie (video game)

message: The article is currently missing the critical reception of the Xbox re-release, which is needed for the GA breadth requirement czar 17:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: czar, I have added the contents of those reviews to retrospective reception, as most of the content in those reviews are pretty much retrospective opinions of the core N64 game. However, opinions on the port itself are in the sequels and ports section. User:HumanxAnthro (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 19:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing reception of Xbox re-release for GA breadth 

message: I think that it is unnecessary to have the part talking about Banjo and Kazooie's mission to rescue Tooty, as well as the game show/board game part and final boss part in the gameplay section. We should delete those parts from the gameplay portion and add a plot summary for the game.  2603:6010:8B00:44FF:5CFE:D49E:E836:C3E1 (talk) 01:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay and Plot
Talk:Oriental Shorthair

message: “What’s up with the completely racist content in the introductory paragraph?”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:101:BBC0:B54E:8855:D11A:E16D (talk) 04:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

message: I have an Oriental Shorthair (ebony-ticked variant coat tabby) with two Grand Champion parents; he's not perfect to type, obviously, or he wouldn't have been sold as a pet (dangling tummy pouch and too-Roman nose were his flaws) but certainly good enough for illustrative purposes.  I'm going to be trying to take a photo of him for Wikipedia, though getting him to not act up for the camera is rather hard ... —Morven 17:36, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: the darn creature will not stand still long enough to be photographed in other than resting poses.  I uploaded one of the latter.  I'll try with an assistant to distract him at a later time ... —Morven 19:14, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Rather than simply having a section called "great pictures", it would be helpful if the pictures were included in the individual sections to illustrate the colors and pattersn. (Great idea, by the way, to break those out individually.) --LQ 13:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The bicolor reference is unclear. Currently it says: 
: It was not until 1977 that the Oriental Shorthair was accepted for competition into the CFA. In 1985, the CFA recognized the bicolor oriental shorthair. The bicolor is any one of the accepted oriental shorthair color patterns with the addition of white to the belly, face, and legs/paws.
Does that mean that the bicolor was "recognized" as its own competition/breed in CFA?  Or that it was recognized as one of the acceptable types of the OSH?  Someone with more knowledge than me should rewrite the entry for clarity.--LQ 14:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins section