lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Geography of India

message: 1) Sir/ Man upon adding the total land borders of India according to this page it comes out to be 15,000 km exact but here 15,200 km is written this is false and baseless information.
2) Sir/ Mam please remove the citation of government of India website as false information has been given.
According to government of India India has a 106 km long border with Afghanistan which is not included in this page. So please remove the citation of government of India.
2409:4043:2218:487:0:0:1C82:70AD (talk) 13:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2021 

message: India also shares border with Afghanistan. Please correct the article. 2409:4055:9A:9CE7:0:0:249F:68A5 (talk) 03:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to the discussions on this topic in the Talk:India archives. There are quite a few discussions which should give you an idea of the Wikipedia consensus around this topic.  All the best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 03:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Border information not acceptable. 
Talk:Melon-headed whale

message: Reporting of deaths of this species at Assateague Island...
* 
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 10:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  News article for consideration 

message: Since the numbers posted in news articles vary so widely, with one source claiming that there were around 500 dolphins in Bataan, I've decided to go with the smallest number all of them can agree on, which is 200 dolphins. Saying "over 200 dolphins" seems the most neutral since it doesn't dispute claims of 300 or 500 dolphins, whereas saying "almost 300" would contradict some of the other sources. --Edward Sandstig (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using "over 200" instead of "almost 300" regarding the events in Bataan on 10 February 2009
Talk:Tucuxi

message: Can somebody convice avampiretear to release this photo under the cc-by-sa, thanks. PS: If s/he does not want to release the photo I metioned before under the cc-by-sa, ask s/he to release all or a few or one of this photos under the cc-by-sa:      . --96.229.184.69 (talk) 05:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph/s of Tucuxi
Talk:Cephalorhynchus

message: Bräger, Stefan, and Zsuzsanna Bräger. “Range Utilization and Movement Patterns of Coastal Hector’s Dolphins (Cephalorhynchus Hectori).” Aquatic Mammals 44.6 (2018): 633–642. Web.
Righi, Carina, Gabriela Blanco, and Esteban Frere. “Abundance and Spatial Distribution of Commerson’s Dolphin (Cephalorhynchus Commersonii) at a Breeding Site: Ría Deseado, Patagonia, Argentina.” Aquatic Mammals 39.1 (2013): 1–9. Web.
Brager, S, J Harraway, and B Manly. “Habitat Selection in a Coastal Dolphin Species (Cephalorhynchus Hectori).” Marine Biology 143.2 (2003): 233–244. Web.
Elwen, Simon, and Ruth Leeney. “Injury and Subsequent Healing of a Propeller Strike Injury to a Heaviside’s Dolphin (Cephalorhynchus Heavisidii).” Aquatic Mammals 36.4 (2010): 382–387. Web.
Wc311 (talk) 05:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography draft
Talk:Commerson's dolphin

message: Thanks for your additions, but Wikia shouldn't be used as it can be edited by anyone. I'll leave things for the moment if you want and are able to better source the names and ages, but if not then changes will need to be backed out.  ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:25, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the material is poorly sourced at the moment and I'm aware of the deficiencies of the source. Maybe the whole section should be removed, or perhaps sent to the talk page for now. I had to leave the house earlier while working on that and knew the sources were an issue. In terms of actual reliability, not the Wikipedia definition of it, so far while gathering information on the captive dolphins the database has proven to be the most reliable source as other published material that would normally pass WP:RS has been either misleadingly out-of-date or simply wrong. I'll maybe remove the material for now until and work on it in a subpage until it's in better shape. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikia is not a [[WP:RS|RS]]
Talk:Spinner dolphin

message: I am puzzled by the remark that "the humpback whale is sometimes referred to as the Long-snouted Dolphin". Is this perhaps a slip of the tongue? Awien 16:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion 
Talk:Lagenorhynchus

message: I found the only available genus for the clade containing the Hourglass and Peale's Dolphins is Sagmatias Cope, 1866. [1] Therefore, Lagenorhynchus cruciger, L. australis, L. obliquidens, and L. obscurus should be changed to Sagmatias cruciger, S. australis, S. obliquidens, and S. obscurus respectively. 
[1] http://www.ubio.org/apps/Hershkovitz/index.php?func=s&ID=48&t=s —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I did not hear any protests after two weeks, I have changed the systematics so it follows the traditional and still valid classification, with all six species included in Lagenorhynchus. Note that the American Society of Mammalogists is not the authority on cetacean taxonomy. If you disagree with the changes, please discuss here before reverting. Thanks, JakobT (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic revision of Lagenorhynchus 

message: Until there is a well-established idea of what kind of genera Lagenorhynchus should be divided into, I suggest making Sagmatias and Leucopleurus redirects to this page. All information about these genera so far can be presented here. HFoxii (talk) 03:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, good proposal. JakobT (talk) 13:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose; the Sagmatias article as it currently stands focusses on the retired genus name, which seems to reflect the current status. The lede is quite clear on this. The  Leucopleurus page is a redirect, and that seems to be appropriately pointing to Atlantic white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus acutus) which does seem to be a better target than Lagenorhynchus. So, readers seem to be best served by the current structure, awaiting future consensus in the field. Klbrain (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing  with no merge given the stale discussion and uncotested objection; not yet might be appropriate too. Klbrain (talk) 16:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal: ''[[Sagmatias]]''
Talk:Atlantic white-sided dolphin

message: See Talk:Lagenorhynchus for proposal to revert the genus to Lagenorhynchus until there is consensus on the systematics. JakobT (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematics of Lagenorhynchus
Talk:Hourglass dolphin

message: This dolphin was identified several times by the participants in the Global Challenge 2004/05. The best photograph they took was this one: http://www.globalchallenge2004.com/en/show_asset.asp?chas_id=4904&size=H
and there's a log referencing them here: http://www.globalchallenge2004.com/en/dailylog.asp?chte_id=388&selected_date=18+Mar+2005
 Kert01 10:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See Talk:Lagenorhynchus for proposal to revert the genus to Lagenorhynchus until there is consensus on the systematics. JakobT (talk) 22:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematics of genus Lagenorhynchus 

message: — Assignment last updated by Gd123104 (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Biology 2
Talk:Peale's dolphin

message: See Talk:Lagenorhynchus for proposal to revert the genus to Lagenorhynchus until there is consensus on the systematics. JakobT (talk) 22:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematics of genus Lagenorhynchus
Talk:Kiichi Miyazawa

message: I have classified this article as a start. It needs further expansion on Miyazawa's life and political career. Given that he is a former Prime Minister, I have rated his importance as high. Capitalistroadster 05:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification

message: It wrote he is born in 1819, isn't there is a mistake?
60.48.39.22 (talk) 15:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kiichi Miyazawa Date of Birth
Talk:John Garand

message: Gayr-und or Grand?-- 64.229.253.13 03:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's Guh-rand. 24.252.50.236 16:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you should have read the article?--Asams10 01:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation? 

message: I heard recently that he was born "Jean Garand", and anglicised his first name to John after immigrating to the US. Is it true? 71.203.209.0 (talk) 04:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean Garand? 

message: In the "Firearms designer" section it says he was commissioned to build a rifle and carbine, it has links to the M1 Garand and M1 Carbine, and while he may have been commissioned to build A carbine, it wasn't the M1 carbine, the M1 carbine (according to its page (and by extension it's sources)) was designed by somebody at Winchester, not Springfield (where Garand worked), he's isn't listed as a designer either, they only have similar names because the US was trying to standardize.
Regards:
172.242.108.122 (talk) 23:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  He Didn't design the M1 Carbine 

message: , Garand was known for his French-Canadian origin by everyone who heard him open his mouth to speak. Yes, perhaps this might be slightly too much emphasis, but note it was in response to someone removing the "American" part. Anmccaff (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to edit war it; IMO, "Canadian-American" is more for somebody who spends time living &/or working here. I would offer no objection whatever to (cited) mention of people noticing his Quebecois origins. If you're satisfied that's enough to call him "American-Canadian" (or whatever), I won't beef.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 22:54, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can leave this up in the air for a bit for now, see what some of the regular suspects here have to say.  Want to get something that is neither inaccurate nor chauvinistic. Anmccaff (talk) 23:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  American, Canadian-American, or Canadian? 

message: An IP editor has recently raised the point that Canadian nationals were primarily seen as British subjects at the time of Garand’s birth, with only one intermediate step of several changes to Canadian citizenship occurring before he became a US citizen. It’s a narrow point, but there is something to it, and the article may need some tweaking to capture this. Qwirkle (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  British vs. Canadian
Talk:Chore Boy

message: So where is this product sold? For this article ever to be meaningful to the wider world then a location should at least be given.Arcturus 22:34, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Knowing that chore boy is used for drug paraphernalia, has the company chore boy changed any of its ingredients? Ronette W (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chore boy
Talk:Power (politics)

message: I notice political authority redirects here - is this actually the same thing as political power?134.219.158.221 (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Political Authority

message: Power politics needs to be defined clearly or else people will get confused and think POWER ABUSE!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.197.118 (talk) 01:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POWER ABUSE

message: Umm, this article is missing something. What IS political power???
-G
---
The question of power has received rather thorough theoretical treatment within political science, and from different perspectives within it such as in international relations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_in_international_relations
it seems like this article should include this, or set to distinguish itself from this.
I added in a quote from Hannah Arendt with a definition of power. I intend to add a little more in the article. Needs thinking about as although I find Arendt's definition compelling and coherent it is not mainstream within political theory and so would need caveats but the comment above illustrates the value of Arendt. Oxford73 (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: I would like to add in a bit about Arendt's definition of power. Any comments from anyone? Oxford73 (talk) 09:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hannah Arendt
Talk:History of youth work

message: Who is the Charles Russell that you are referring to? Is he listed on the disambiguation page? WouterVH 22:39, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles Russell disambiguation
Talk:Dodge Rampage

message: Was this vehicle a marketing flop? if it was, list it on List of commercial failures.  I'm assuming that this is a marketing flop because haven't seen too many vehicles like this on the road.  Or is this a fair-selling vehicle that had several copies sent to the junkyard relatively early? --SuperDude 22:48, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really a flop - a good number were sold.  It was just never a really practical truck.  I'd liken it to a slow-selling model (like the Mazda Navajo) not a flop like the Daihatsu Rocky. --SFoskett 14:28, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
I have an 83 Rampage. I love it! Course I'm doing a fair amount of mods including a 2.5 Turbo and 5 speed but even stock it's pretty cool. Draws attention like crazy. I'm one of four in my city and mine is the only 83. Personally I think the Rampage was a flop. I called my Dodge dealership on time and no one knew what a Rampage was but it's a Charger from the A-pillars forward (including suspension and powertrain) so finding parts isn't a huge hassel if you know where to look. - Mr. Rampage
I have an 82 Rampage and I have noticed how everybody forgets that the thing came with an optional 3-speed automatic transmission. I'm a little surprised how Wikipedia is the only site with any sort of up to date information on the car. many other sites will tell you that it has a Volkswagen motor in it when it actually has a Mitsubishi 2.2. Really the thing is an 80's charger in the front half. The only difference is the bed and the lack of a stock turbo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.28.14 (talk) 23:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

message: I think VW's Sporttruck would predate this model by two years considering they were made as early 1980. I'm going to change the line to "one of the few". It could also be corrected to "one of the first", but it's also one of the last manufactured so I find that a tad silly. Urlor (talk) 21:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First FF sports truck? 

message: Does anyone know the dimensions of the bed? 2600:100E:B06F:5DED:28F5:7C53:EF9:7682 (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bed size
Talk:George L. Hart

message: I added the Wikify tag because this is just a copy and paste of the guy's faculty webpage.  That's ok -- my JP Mallory article was derived mostly from this type of source, but it was Wikified. --Jpbrenna 22:54, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's at the temp page, and I think it passes copyright muster.  The sources were his faculty homepage, the essay Why Tamil is a Classical Language and the Alibris listings of his books that are for sale.  It's stubby, but at least it's not a copy/paste dump of copyrighted material! --Jpbrenna 04:54, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article 

message: The article starts with by saying "He is a tamil professor", but goes on to immediately say "He has a PhD in Sanskrit"... His qualifications on Tamil and his transition to Tamil teaching is not clearly mentioned... Was he a Tamil professor who went on to acquire a Sanskrit PhD?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.153.34 (talk) 03:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Tamil Qualitification 

message: Suda who? 
* ON THE UNINTENDED INFLUENCE OF JAINISM ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CASTE IN POST-CLASSICAL TAMIL SOCIETY has been cited only five times since 2008. In contrast, Chakravarti has been cited 254 times, and Samuel 184 times.
* Hagiography Versus History: The Tamil Pāṇar in Bhakti-Oriented Hagiographic Texts and Inscriptions is self-published
Looks like someone is pushing :Sudalaimuthu Palaniappan, using Hart as a WP:COATRACK. 
Ah right, an scholar, who "has worked for several years in the transportation and information technology industries", and also wrote two articles on Tamil literarture, one of which was published. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sudalaimuthu Palaniappan
Talk:Ilmarinen

message: If you ask me, this article is a bloody mess. I fail to see how anything short of a total rewrite could make it better. Personally, I lack the necessary erudition and research to the source material, however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agamemnon2 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :lmarinen, the Eternal Hammerer, blacksmith and inventor in the Kalevala, is a god and an archetypal artificer from Finnish mythology.
Point of note - this is not what archetype means , ( see also Jungian archetypes and Archetypal literary criticism ) .. His archetype could be artificer - but that is the reverse of what was written.
His own archetype appears to be "magickal smith"/"artificer" (in many myths "dwarf") - but we don't appear to have article on that ... 5.198.10.236 (talk) 14:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed "archetype"
Talk:List of Renault vehicles

message: Shouldn't Formula One cars made by Renault be part of this list as well?--Skully Collins 14:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula One cars 

message: There is significant duplication between the list on the Renault and Renault Trucks pages, not to mention the existing Category: Renault vehicles. I would suggest that the Category page is updated to include all the various models and subsidary marques, so that the main wikipedia pages can concentrate on prose rather than lists. Any thoughts? Warren Whyte (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page no longer required?
Talk:Wilf Lunn

message: Err. I was born and brought up in Huddersfield and I have never heard of Wilf Lunn. Can we have some cited sources please. -- Chris j wood 22:57, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have to disagree with Richard Harvey about the removal of the official Wilf Lunn website. The guidance on external links is quite clear in Wikipedia:External_links:
'What should be linked - 1) Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any.' 
with the proviso that:
'Links to be avoided - 5) Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to sites with objectionable amounts of advertising'
Although the site does have a modest amount of advertising, the same could be said of many 'official' websites for performers and bands (for example Ian Macmillan is advertising his latest book on his official site which is linked to).Thozza (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a fan of Wilf Lunn I appreciate your concern. My removal of the link was purely based on experience of multiple removals of similar links. I have previously posted up similar links and then gone through the process of being advised about spam links and also self promotional websites. I suggest you place a query on Wikipedia talk:Spam regarding the suitability of the link where Admins more experienced in the finer aspect of links will then determine if it suitable or not. Note though that the website has sales of items on the home page, where his registered company address is also displayed:- (Wilf Ltd - Reg No. 4821019 England - Reg Office: Hirsel, Jumble Wood, Huddersfield HD8 0AN) which shows it is a commercial website. Further sales of items exist on at least one other page:- Bicycles.  Apart from item 5 on the Links normally to be avoided item 11:- Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority. is also brought into question, as Wilf himself edits the website. Richard Harvey (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is entirely appropriate that the personal website of the subject of a biographical article be linked from the article. By your bizarre logic we wouldn't link to the ford motor company's website from the ford article, because it serves to advertise cars. I have added the link again; please gain consensus before removing it again. 87.113.23.129 (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the series of reverts to the website link, I have requested comments on Wikipedia_talk:Spam as previously suggested by Richard Harvey. Thozza (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The link to the Official website seems to be now down for maintenance, as it has been updated to say "R.I.P." There is an alternative site here, but not sure of that is WP:RS. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to Wilf Lunn website
Talk:Aung San Suu Kyi

message: Please could you remove the line next to source 151 which reads "Some of the money she received as part of the award helps fund London-based charity Prospect Burma, which provides higher education grants to Burmese students" as this is not true. Source 151, Prospect Burma's website, confirms what that charity does but there is no evidence to support the statement that ASSK's money supports their work - which I am aware is not the case. Do check with information@prospectburma.org if you need to. Thank you so much for your help. Inferena (talk) 14:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template.  This appears to support that. There's also  visible here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

text: I have changed the request template to the template used for WP:COI edit requests. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Done  ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 07:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 December 2021 

message: Suggestion: split Political career section into new page/article. 
Reason: it's too long, especially on mobile.
*See Political career of Donald Trump or Political career of Abraham Lincoln (1849–1861) for references.
EdhyRa (talk) 10:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political career split suggestion
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Matt Hartley

message: If you are going to vote for deletion on a LEGITIMATE page, then just take the whole site down. I will also work very hard to make sure that people understand the tyrannical way people vote anything away regardless of a person's contributions to the Web community as a whole. Matt has done so much for so many, yet because he misposted a page ONE YEAR AGO, the article I posted on his behalf is marked for deletion! That is so sad.
Once again, this was a legit article done to spec in every way. But whatever, that is just really unfortunate and people will hear about this.
If you are honorable people, you will at the very least post an apology for this act of stupidity. I tend to doubt however, that this will happen though.
* You chose to blank out the VfD that certainly appears to be to hide the fact that this page had been deleted in the past.  Then you inserted advertising and vanity into Xandros and MEPIS.  It's hard to believe this is all in good faith.  Wikibofh 22:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)