lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monticello Dam

message: News of the fatal accident at the morning glory spillway
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1997/03/12/MNR3BA2.DTL  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.11.88.191 (talk) 07:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does Emily Schwalen get a special fun fact mention for dying in the Glory Hole? That tidbit is highly out of place on this page regardless of its merit (or lack thereof). Recommendation for removal or at least relocation. RobertBaron   — Preceding undated comment added 23:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not reward stupidity 

message: The article has an error.  The water from Lake Berryessa is used for agricultural irigation in Solano county.  It does not supply the North Bay.
Tpferro (talk) 22:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water from Lake Berryessa is used for agricultural irigation
Talk:Enid Bagnold

message: No reference to her daily drug use?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.12.189 (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I was a little surprised too by how that is missing, here is one reference: Guardian Mathmo Talk 02:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Morgan Hill Unified School District

message: I noticed Encinal School was listed as a school in the Morgan Hill Unified School District. However, Encinal closed and combined with Los Paseos several years ago. Los Paseos is now a K-6 school.  The Encinal school site is now the Charter School in Morgan Hill. 76.193.119.147 (talk) 02:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools closed
Talk:Morongo Basin

message: Please help with the Reorganization of this article brought to you by Wikiproject Inland Empire in an effort to help articles relating to the Inland Empire Metropolitan Area. House1090 (talk) 22:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization project by [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Inland Empire|Wikiproject Inland Empire]] 

message: None given  yet, I think the more common term is Morongo Valley (for part of the area).--Pete Tillman (talk) 03:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually there are plenty of RS's, for example Morongo Basin Regional Conservation and Land Use Planning Project, which might be a good start. --Pete Tillman (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morongo Basin name needs a RS
Talk:Deepak Dev

message: The source at "http://www.last.fm/music/Deepak+Dev/+wiki?ver=2" can not be used as the website says, "Factbox-Generated from facts marked up in the wikipedia. No facts about this artist"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpbolumbu (talk • contribs) 08:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonreliable sources
Talk:Morro Bay High School

message: I went to this high school. Even though the SAT reference is citing the source correctly, it is flat out wrong from my personal experience. Even without my personal experience, the SAT score seem not to be in line with the other values the school has recorded, this list seems much more accurate: http://projects.latimes.com/schools/sat-scores/ranking/page/1/. I'm changing it, but if anyone thinks this is the wrong course of action, respond here and we can discuss.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.138.102 (talk) 21:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: SAT Unbelievable

message: Entire table appears to be original research per the statement "these statistics are all based on all based on the analysis of a culmination of Yearbooks from, 2010, 2011, & 2018" The information and tables do not appear to be notable and are not typically included in school articles. Entire section (besides last paragraph with source) should be deleted if it is an "analysis." Fettlemap (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 
Talk:Morro Bay State Park

message: When was the Morro Bay State Park designated?Please mention the source. --2003:DE:1712:B600:6DE3:2310:DA88:3D03 (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designation 

message: What's the size of the Morro Bay State Park?Please mention the source. --2003:DE:1712:B600:6DE3:2310:DA88:3D03 (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Morro Rock

message: Or maybe snout? I'm not sure if that's the historical relevance of the word used Juan Crespí. I think this detail should be added, particularly near the bit about the first European sighting. JustGaro (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in Spanish. Morro is a standard word for a hill or large rock. There are no credible sources stating otherwise. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I'll delete the topic then. JustGaro (talk) 15:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morro means nose, right?
Talk:Moscone Center

message: I am wondering if anyone can add the information about the cost to rent the Moscone Center. For instance, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) holds its annual week-long fall meeting there every December, usually in Moscone West and Moscone South. What is the cost to rent these two buildings for a week? --Roland 21:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost to Rent the Moscone Center? 

message: Moscone is pronounced "moss-coney" as opposed to "moss cone". The article for Mayor Moscone shows an IPA transcription of /mɒsˈkoʊni/, which closely matches my guess from Wikipedia:IPA_for_English. I've added an "easy" pronunciation but depending on Wikipedia's style book, it may be more appropriate to have the IPA version. Shouran (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moscone North hall was built starting in the late 1980s and completed in 1992, so the construction area for that hall is entirely possible as the site for something.  This is the hall that the Metreon was built on top of about a decade later (opened 1999); for a long time after initial construction, the roof of the North hall was just open, exposed steel beams at ground level; the Metreon and some other construction were built on top of that (the north hall had been designed to have such additional construction).  Georgewilliamherbert 01:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for clarifying it. Cheers. JimboB 07:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I think there is a mistake in the article.  Moscone North is underneath Yerba Buena Gardens, but Moscone South (the original building) is above ground, right?  --Westwind273 (talk) 17:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underground? 

message: The Keith Haring sculpture "Untitled" (three dancing figures) is at the corner of 3rd and Howard, not 5th and Howard. — Borderhacker (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a current reference proving this and updated the page accordingly. --Chadwpalm (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Haring sculpture
Talk:Moses Sherman

message: Will be correcting the existing prose which confuses two separate syndicate purchases and the nature of of what Sherman may or may not have done around 1904.   There were two syndicates - one purchased an option on the George K. Porter ranch (around 16,500 acres) in 1903, and took up the option in 1904 or 1905.  Sherman was not part of this syndicate, but this is the purchase that Sherman was alleged to have informed the purchasers so the syndicate could take advantage of the coming aqueduct. Their company was the San Fernando Mission Land Company.
The second one is the purchase in 1909, well after the aqueduct had been announced, of 47,000 acres in the southern half of the valley - the five member "Board of Control" was comprised of Sherman, Harry Chandler, Otto Brant, Hobart Whitley and  Harrison Gray Otis, who brought in 30 others to purchase the land.  So this group bought the property - it was not a rush of speculators (as in a bunch of individuals who separately purchased lots of separarate properties, if that is clearer)
In addition, in all the sources I possess (see the Bibliography), there is no suggestion that the profits he made in real estate made up for flagging railway profits.  There really isn't any information on how much he made in real estate profits, and on the railway, the LAP was sold for a reported $6 million in 1906, and that he had sold Huntington his interest in the Los Angeles Railway in 1898, and made a nice profit for himself, as YHuntington put it.
So I'll be adding info about the 1909 purchase, which he was very involved in, and some info about his activity on the Water Board and why he was booted off the Board in 1909 - and will remove the statements about profits.  1951bfrj (talk) 05:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: San Fernando Valley
Talk:Moss Landing Power Plant

message: This February, the Vistra Moss Landing battery storage was turned on (a few months behind the December 2020 goal.)
I haven't done enough research to edit (and it's 6AM here) but here's a starter link: https://insideevs.com/news/489894/vistra-moss-landing-energy-storage-world-largest/ Fencerdave (talk) 14:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates needed, Feb 2021 

message: in at two places the moss landing article gives a capacity (energy quantity) in MW instead of MWh.  I would appreciate someone correcting this.  
Capacity (energy storage) is a quantity of energy;  electrically the appropriate unit is watt-hours, while a rate of use transfer conversion, etc. is simply watts.  Please don't confuse.  Note: a watt is a joule/second. while a watt houre is a J/s. times 3600 seconds..  So the seconds cancell leaving joule(s) a unit of energy.  A J is a newton meter.  i.e.  force times the distance through the force acts, which is work. OlderPhysicist (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know specifically WHICH occurrence of MW you are talking about, but electrical generation capacity is in MW. See nameplate capacity, for example.  Additionally, battery installations are also rated in nameplate capacity, as in how much they can deliver, generally for about 4 hours max.  Grid storage is not stated in MWh of energy stored, when you see it talked about in news articles; this may be your confusion.  Or maybe you can point out the specific place in the article you feel is incorrect? ---Avatar317(talk) 01:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion:  capacity and rate (energy) 

message: It has recently become my weekly commute to pass by this facility via highway 1. Visible from the street, there are heaps of concrete rubble and various debris at it’s base making the facility look like an abandoned wasteland. From some quick searches, I was able to see that it used to look clean and tidy at the base as recently as 5 months ago, but was not able to find a cause for its current appearance. The white buildings and surrounding concrete walkways seem to have been demolished, leaving the pipework visible from the street. If anyone has any information about a demolition project or some other event that caused this, please update the article or reply here. Thanks 2601:640:8780:3680:2DA3:6838:5FAD:DB95 (talk) 06:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concrete rubble at base, visible from highway
Talk:Moss Landing, California

message: After a standard gauge railroad was pushed south from San Fransisco to San Jose, then to Gilroy, and next to Pajaro, then Castroville, then Salinas, a branch was line laid to Moss Bay which could serve as a port for Salinas Valley agricultural products.  It would have been a major turning point when the railroad first arrived at Moss Bay. 75.172.113.2 (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrival of the railroad in Moss Bay
Talk:Mossbrae Falls

message: I've started article cleanup on this one, and also figured out exactly where the original text came from! This was created by a direct c/p from waterfallswest.com. That site reads exactly like the article did, including the bit about a "little paradise, or Garden of Eden". As this could be copyright vio, the text has been changed significantly to differ it from the source website, and steer it in a more NPOV and encyclopedic direction. Source citations also need to be added, but it is now a work in progress. Edit Centric (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup 
Talk:Motion Picture & Television Country House and Hospital

message: When I first saw that name I thought someone had added it in bad faith. Only after I clicked the link did I realize this was another actor by the same name. Since many readers won't think to click the link, I added a disambiguation note. 68.146.64.9 (talk) 22:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harrison Ford 

message: The names of LIVING residents at the campus are PRIVATE. It is NOT public information.
Who decides who is 'famous'? Is there a secret Wiki-committee?
Who decides who is on that committee? The public has the right to know! 66.81.105.106 (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  re 'Famous residents' 
Talk:Motion Picture & Television Fund

message: I want the picture of lung cancer and symbols of lung cancer treatment/risk/causes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.190.102 (talk) 14:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural sciences
Talk:Robert A. Mott Athletics Center

message: I recently removed this from the article.  Just this past weekend I visited Cal Poly for the first time and it is on the wall ("The Asylum / Student section of Cal Poly), but it appears to refer to the student section, not the gym as a whole.  The equivalent would be the Orange Curtain (CSUF) or the Monson Maniacs (LBSU), which have never been the names of the gym.  I therefore ask for a citation to prove that the gym itself has, in fact, been called The Aslyum. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Asylum 
Talk:RAF Menwith Hill

message: I am reverting the edits that removed RAF Menwith Hill from the USAF in the United Kingdom template... my justifications are as follows...
# RAF Menwith Hill is currently run by the 424 Air Base Squadron (ABS) which is part of the 501 Combat Support Wing (CSW). This organization is aligned under United States Air Forces in Europe.
# Similar to other RAF bases run by the USAF (to include Mildenhall and Lakenheath)... it is on long term lease from the MoD to conduct operations in the UK.
# The MoD operations going on at Menwith Hill may be in concert with the USAF, but Menwith Hill is most definitely part of the USAF in the United Kingdom.
# The fourth and most compelling case would be in the following link directly from the RAF website... Royal Air Force TODAY.  If you scroll down to current bases, the directly administered ones controlled by the USAF have a #3 superscript and Menwith Hill clearly has one. 
Thanks. Jazznutuva 14:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAF Menwith Hill 

message: Can someone fix the link: "NRO-FOIA request" for the .pdf document? The URL is http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/72/NRO_FOIA_request.pdf . Reference 3 at the bottom. Thx :) Mark  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.91.28 (talk) 02:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a problem with the URL you supplied. Keith D (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:Mount Davidson (California)

message: Since this historical event is uncertain as to all the factual circumstances as to how or why it occurred; it is better to refer to it as alleged until more evidence exists to claim it was actually "genocide" and not just due to the unfortunate conditions of war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.150.249.19 (talk) 20:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good faith edit about "Armenian Genocide" 

message: San Francisco is seven miles square, and Mount Davidson is two miles south of the geographical center, so I would say that is not near the geographical center. Suggest deleting this from the article. --Westwind273 (talk) 16:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not near the geographical center
Talk:Mount Hermon, California

message: I did some copy-editing.  I'll leave it up to others to decide if the copy-edit template should be removed.  Eleven even (talk) 03:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-editing 

message: The article has become cluttered with trivia about ropes courses.  Although that may be a significant source of supplemental revenue for the Mount Hermon Association, it has little or nothing to do with the community of Mount Hermon or the Christian conference center.  This material should be toned down or removed, lest the article become an advertising page. Anyone who is interested in such activity details can always go to the mounthermon.org site or telephone for fees and schedules. — QuicksilverT @ 20:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ropes course trivia 
Talk:Mount Signal, California

message: THE LOCATION DISCLOSED IN THE WEB ARTICLE IS TOTALLY WRONG!!!!.....MOUNT SIGNAL MOUNTAIN IS ON THE MEXICO SIDE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.114.63.86 (talk) 20:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Even if nothing else, that this community is home to the Centinela Solar Energy Project - which is itself notable - qualifies as making the community itself notable. While I agree that a fair bit of the text needs sourcing, the location is rather well-known, and even if the unsourced material were removed, there is still more that is said here about the community than there is in the very skimpy Wikipedia article about the mountain itself, especially given that the official name of the mountain is NOT Mount Signal; that's just what people on the US side of the border call it. Dyanega (talk) 02:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed deletion
Talk:Mount Tamalpais State Park

message: Could somebody please change the table from HTML to Wikipedia format? I wanted to adjust the width of the picture, but I don't know how to edit raw HTML. Putting it in Wikipedia format would make it much easier for users to edit the table. Peter G Werner 23:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The table

message: The locator map is way off. Mount Tam isn't in the Sierras. -- Scott eiπ 08:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: The current date of 1963 seems unlikely given that the CCC was completing projects here in the 1930s. I've been able to find precious little online from reliable sources. List of California state parks says 1928, Marin Magazine says 1927. The park's own brochure only says that in 1928, a local philanthropist "donated 200 acres of land in Steep Ravine to help create" the park. -- Scott (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, this is amusing. Apparently the unsourced 1963 establishment date was added by me, . -- Scott (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Date established
Talk:Sculthorpe Training Area

message: I was stationed at RAF Sculthorpe from 89-91 with the USAF.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.97.226.165 (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, the entire RAF was at Sculthorpe!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.78.17 (talk) 22:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was stationed there between 1989 and 1991
Talk:RAF Brize Norton

message: The article is not clear by what measure it is the largest airbase. To my mind this could be any number of measures:
*Real estate
*Runway length
*No. of aircraft
*No. of personel
*A.N. Other
Apologies if it's obvious, I haven't checked d any of the sources and only gave the article a cursory read. MickMacNee (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest? 

message: I grew up in Carterton, which is the principal town co-located with RAF Brize Norton and home to many serving (and former) RAF personnel.  In school I was taught (anecdotally) that the RAF station was called RAF Brize Norton, rather than RAF Carterton, because of the existence at the time of RAF Cardington and the possibility of mistaken identity over radio communications.  I can find no source for this though. Weasley one (talk) 13:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The majority of the time the airfields were named after the nearest place with a railway station since Brize Norton had a railway station and Carterton did not. However in some cases the airfield was named something different if the name sounded like another airfield that already existed. Gavbadger (talk) 14:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Should not 10, 99 & 101 Squadrons be removed form the past units section? They are currently operating from Brize, and I assumed that they were left there because at the time they operated different aircraft? But the more I think about it, it doesn't make sense. Regards The joy of all things (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would completely agree, squadrons should be within either the current or past units sections, rather than both. I did update the current units but hadn't noticed that those squadrons mentioned were in the past section too so I'll amend the list. Regards Thx811 (talk) 21:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current/past squadrons
Talk:Trim (cat)

message: Everyone - I am inspired to link this orphan mostly due to my own "Trim," Sleazy - who is asleep on my lap as I write this: The mentioned novel has an orphan page located at [] - I would do the editing myself but I am on my phone - and wiki editing isn't exactly optimized for phones yet & neither shall I disturb the respite of this animal in the name of getting to the laptop.  I've had trouble even logging into my account, but I am gh05t.  To anyone who makes this connection before I am able, many thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.236.65 (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

message: Two points that are contrary to what I have read. One, Trim was a gift from Flinder's wife. Two,  Flinder's stated that Trim was probably fell prey to the Mauritian " catophages", no mention of " hungry slaves". As this was in the period of the Napoleonic wars, there were no longer any slaves in the French realms. 
This is in print, from the last century. Athanasius V (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trim the cat
Talk:Mountain View Cemetery (Oakland, California)

message: There are a number of names here which are redlinked. such names need to be accompanied by at least 2 references, one showing their notability, the other showing their burial or interment at Mountain View Cemetery. I am cleaning up some of the burial content of the SF Bay, and will leave the unsourced material here for a while. if no one adds such refs, at some point in the future i will remove the names (or, of course, try to find refs myself). This page has no active talk, so i dont expect anyone to notice this.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  And forgive me for also trying out a more readable format that attempts to break the list down into categories.sallison (talk) 03:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Interments
Talk:Mount Hope, San Diego

message: How come no mention of Helix Heights?  The western portion of Mount Hope was a separate neighborhood called Helix Heights in the 1970s/1980s.98.176.233.118 (talk) 01:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alta Vista, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Muscle Beach

message: I will be adding and editing stuff on here (seeing that it's kind of blah).  I couldn't believe that there were no internal and external links that references Muscle Beach Venice anywhere in the article.  So, I added the internal link to Joe Weider and external link to the official website for Muscle Beach down at the bottom.
Thanks!--Webmistress Diva 05:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello! 

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 17:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations