Talk:Electric Slide

message: I have posted a pretty short update on the lawsuit as EFF and R. Sliver have settled the lawsuit.  Terms of the settlement are that the "Dance" license shall be now CC.  Its final weeks for me, so i just made a quick edit about the lawsuit.  Someone please go thru the article and update the whole thing (or i will when i have time).
Zsiddique 02:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some initial tidying-up. `'mikka 17:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update on lawsuit

message: Copyright was submitted? What does that mean? 69.253.222.184 (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: Does anyone want to justify why this article is tagged as over-detailed, or can we just take that down.  'Cause honestly, while the article might need some cleaning up, over-detailed it ain't.  I'd love to see, for example, a reference to its popularity in the 50s and a bit of rewording in the section about the litigations; but there isn't a single section here that is unnecessary or of interest to a minority.  Lostdrewid (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over detailed? 

message: The article states that "As early as 2004, Silver had started filling DMCA-based takedown notices to YouTube users who were posting videos of people performing the 18 step dance variation." This however is impossible due to the fact that YouTube was no created until 2005.
Wikipedialuva 18:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Lawsuit Error 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lindy hop which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 07:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lindy Hop which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Electric Slide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160508094754/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/05/electric-slide-creator-calls-online-take-down-campaign to https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/05/electric-slide-creator-calls-online-take-down-campaign
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Rather than a drive-by tagging, I wanted to outline the concerns I hold with the article as it currently stands.In my view, this article fails to meet the notability criteria.
If anyone wishes to comment, or provide additional references, please feel free! However I am tempted to submit it to AfD as I do not believe the subject has achieved  (or is likely to achieve) notability.
Notability 
* ...significant coverage...
:*I do not believe there is significant coverage of the topic.
::A general Google web search using various combinations of the terms ("Electric Slide" and "Dance" "Choreography" "Line Dance" "Boogie" "Electric Boogie" "Marcia Griffiths" "Bunny Wailer" "Richard L Silver" "Ric Silver" "Richard Silver" or "Silver") found, at most, 340,000 results. A Google news search using the same terms found 2,140 results. A Google news archive search found 3 results. A Google books search found 4,370 results.
::*A review of these results found that none of these sources featured the Electric Slide as the direct, detailed focus. They were vastly 'Human Interest' stories which just so happened to include the Electric Slide; which was, by no means, the focus of the article. It was essentially irrelevant to these sources whether the Electric Slide, the chicken dance, or any other dance was mentioned. Essentially, they were trivial mentions.
*...reliable sources that are independent of the subject...
:*i.e. secondary sources
::The first reference in the article is a first party source, providing the copyright documentation confirming that a copyright is held over the Electric Slide. 
::The other two sources are links to Electronic Frontier Foundation press releases regarding a legal case surrounding the Copyright held by the choreographer. I do not believe these may be considered persuasive sources as to the notability of the Electric Slide
::There were no additional secondary sources available on my search which provided significant coverage.
Essentially, as it stands this subject does not appear to be notable. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: this is a line dance taught in ballroom schools all over the united states. its steps described in numerous places. there is nothing much to talk about it. coverage is sufficient. - üser:Altenmann >t 19:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

text: coi tag is redundant: no abuse, article has been edited and watched by many. - üser:Altenmann >t 19:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues with Article

message: https://www.essence.com/entertainment/the-best-man-changed-black-weddings-forever-thanks-to-one-song/ 
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2020/jun/11/how-the-electric-slide-became-the-black-lives-matter-protest-dance
84.67.78.238 (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references