lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Corn Is Green

message: Just how autobiographical is this play?  Did he really get a young woman pregnant, which nearly stopped him going to university?  (One point which casts doubt on this is that he was gay - this may have been a red herring on his part.)  And was there really no school in his village prior to the Bette Davis character arriving?  Legally, there has been universal free and compulsory education in the UK since the late 19th century.
Some writers' works may include elements taken from their background but which are less autobiographical than some people have taken them to be e.g. I Remember Mama. PatGallacher (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: I tagged this as unreferenced as it has no citations to verifiable, reliable sources. The tag was removed by User:PatGallacher with the summary "drive by tagging".  I have reinstated the tag as the article is unreferenced. The El to IBDb is not a reliable source for the content of this article. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced
Talk:Love Affair (1939 film)

message: With your kind permission, I am going to remove the stub tag, as this article is much longer than the typical stub article. Thank you.
Treybien 16:25 1 February 2009 (UTC)
:No, it's still a stub - I've restored the tag.  Best way to remove the tag is to expand the article. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 05:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub tag

message: The "Terry McKay" character name was used also in that 1957 movie (An Affair to Remember).  (I found out about the 1957 movie when I stumbled across a song in it called "Tiny Scout (He Knows You Inside Out)", and I even made my own electronic arrangement of that music and put it on a website.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 (talk) 15:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  same character name in 1957 
Talk:John Ross (author)

message: The article seems to totally lack sources while it makes a number of bold statements. David.Monniaux 18:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looked up the references and added them.  John Ross is a rather bold fellow, and the statements largely parallel the thoughts in his novel. :-)  Yaf 02:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources ? 
Talk:Satan Met a Lady

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :The Maltese Falcon (1936 film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#The Maltese Falcon (1936 film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Clarityfiend (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Maltese Falcon (1936 film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Juarez (film)

message: The plot summary provided here is exceptionally inaccurate. It appears to have been written from memory by someone who may not have seen the film for a long time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.211.144 (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: plot summary

message: Maximilian was no puppet, he fell in love with the mexican people and land refused to impose french and catholic rule infuriating france and the pope, took the libertarian approach becoming a defensor of workers (lessen working hours, abolished child labor, the company store, etc) and gave his life and blood for the sake of independence, his last words were "i forgive you all[...] long live mexico!"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:1016:D:5574:A55E:CFE7:6E86:A79D (talk) 05:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: No puppet
Talk:The Great Lie

message: not a great movie... it's the cast that makes it. As in another Davis movie 'Jezebel' (1938?), the hired help on da farm play a major? role... great to see Hattie singing, etc. The fellow as 'Jefferson', farm hand, butler.. is/was in real life, Hattie's older brother Sam McDaniel. And yes, he's listed in the credits. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  de Old Folks at Home...
Talk:Bandits (2001 film)

message: Why????????????
Why give the end of the movie away (ref: "Plot Outline" section of entry) ????????????
What a completely moronic thing to do.  Ruin it for everybody.  This should not be allowed.  As a matter of fact, doing this could be a reason for somebody not wanting to go ahead and watch the movie.  If I had any kind of financial interest in this film I would think about a law suit.  I'm sure that most of the other film titles are done this way on this - and probably other websites.  Just more proof of what a dumba** the human animal can be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.167.30 (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats the point of a plot outline. It is meant to tell the plot, not to get people to watch the movie. It's a plot outline not a teaser.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.255.149 (talk) 20:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: Is this based on a true story? 2A01:5A8:31C:6DA:DE4E:F76:F9D0:E340 (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  True Story?
Talk:Hart's War

message: What about the mistreatment of russian POW's?
It's clear from the film the different treatment, derived from Russia not signing the Geneva Convention: this implied to the Nazis that the convention didn't apply to russian POW's.
In the movie russian POW's aren't feed appropiatly and are made to work (forced labor).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.10.14.209 (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was far worse for German prisoners of war in the USSR...58.107.179.146 (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Stolen Life (film)

message: This is a bit inaccurate.  Bill apparently only knows of Pat's latest lover.  When Kate tells him (the lover) that she must end their relationship, he angrily tells her that he now realizes that he was just like "all the others," which is apparently news to her.  She then tells Bill that their relationship would never work, as "she" had had too many lovers and that he was a laughingstock.  As she leaves, the expression on his face reveals that he has seen through her disguise.  Just before the end, when he addresses her as "Kate," she then says, "then, you know?".  Kostaki mou (talk) 20:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of plot
Talk:Donna Tartt

message: There isn't anything, anywhere suggesting, as it is done in the Wikipedia's article, that Donna Tartt is of italian descent.
:::Donna Tartaglia
The reference to her mysterious connection to some un-named Anthony Perkins biography written by some anonymous person is bizarre.  If sourced, this might be worthwhile as trivia or miscellania, but it is certainly not what Donna Tartt is notable for.
I really don't understand why a contribution I made on the "External Link" section (I simply added a site containing an essay on "The Secret History" worth reading) went under the definition of "vandalism" and then, deleted. WHY??? Henry Cassini 11:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What, exactly, is "pledged to the sorority Kappa Kappa Gamma," supposed to mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.64.99 (talk) 23:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  American secret code? 

message: This article has no photo of Donna Tartt. She is photographed often, having been named as best-dressed in 2014. - - Prairieplant (talk) 04:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is there a photo of her novels title in German? I am not clear what this image adds to the article in English. --Prairieplant (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need photo in infobox 

message: https://arlindo-correia.com/081202.html
: .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scraps 

message: I've altered the 'Personal Life' section of the article to reflect the age of the references which do exist, via tense changes, and remove references which did not back up text. In the first case, I removed the reference to the subject of the article talking on the 'phone to her mother every day and not talking to her father as this seemed preferable to the otherwise odd observation (from a 2021 perspective) that in 2002 she said these things were true between 1982 and 2002. In the second case, I took out references to her habits re: book tours and literary festivals because they were not supported by the references provided. Additionally, I balanced the subject's reference to not being a recluse with a paraphrasing of and reference to her words in order to allow the reader to make her/his own judgement. It is fair to say, I think, that the paucity of personal information available on an international publishing phenomenon is either a function of her reclusiveness from the public in some form, or of an effort by interested parties to ensure an air of mystery is applied to her public persona. SteveCree2 (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Life

message: I've reverted the comments about the movie's failure as they are pertinent to the public and notable dropping by Tartt of her agent. They are, in this way, pertinent to understanding Tartt's putative relationship with the subsequent commercial exploitation of her work. SteveCree2 (talk) 19:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It would work best with a citation to a reputable source. Icarus of old (talk) 02:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to failure of Goldfinch movie
Talk:The Star (1952 film)

message: I've just finished listening to three books on Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. Two were autobiographies written by Davis ("The Lonely Life," and "This 'N That"), and the third was "Bette and Joan: The Divine Feud," by John Considine. As a result, my understanding of this film is a bit different than in the description provided.
First, Bette Davis is on record numerous times saying that this film was NOT based on Joan Crawford. She often quipped, "I would never play Joan Crawford. She did a good job doing that herself," or something to that effect. Also, according to Considine, the wedding of Katherine Albert's and Dale Eunson's daughter took place in 1952. This film was released that same year, so it must have been written, cast, and shot at least a year before (and a year before the supposed retaliatory wedding. I don't see how that could have been done in retaliation by Joan Crawford.
Perhaps more references are in order to make these claims?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:8400:4AD1:8590:7D8F:14A4:81A1 (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Talk:The Scapegoat (Du Maurier novel)

message: I'm sorry, but there is no reason to remove it and no one has bothered to explain why. The sentence reads that the previous film starred an actor so there is no reason to remove Rhys. I'm putting it back. Either remove Alec and Matthew, or leave Matthew. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was "starring Matthew Rhys" reverted?
Talk:Pocketful of Miracles

message: There doesn't seem to be an article for him, as the article being linked to currently points to a football player born in 1970 (9 years after the movie premiered). For quick reference, here's a link to his IMDB page (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0542920/).Makatigirl (talk) 15:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The wrong Peter Mann is referenced 

message: The following is user comment which was left in the main article a while back:
:NOTE: IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE FOR HARRY COHN HIMSELF TO HAVE SOLD FRANK CAPRA THE RIGHTS IN 1960 - HARRY COHN HAD ALREADY DIED 2 YEARS EARLIER - ON FEBRUARY 27, 1958. THEREFORE ANOTHER EXECUTIVE AT COLUMBIA PICTURES WOULD HAVE SOLD THE RIGHTS INSTEAD!
(I've edited accordingly.) —MistyMorn (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen rights 

message: bvb bv cv 2603:7081:700:690B:1C09:D4CC:3E0A:3ABA (talk) 18:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  gc b cc vv
Talk:Uncharted Waters

message: This has to have a source. It has to be verifiable. Wikipedia:Attribution says "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a publisher of original thought. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true." --AW 14:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Leon is not a common Portuguese name" 

message: Is it worth mentioning this? Source= http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-news/3931.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ffgamera (talk • contribs) 03:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Koei's Uncharted Waters" coming to PlayStation 3 

message: In mobile view, the short description of this article says "6800 video game". Could someone fix this?-- Maxeto0910 (talk) 18:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The short description should say "Video game series" now. Ludoyo (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description
Talk:The Nanny (1965 film)

message: It is not Virginia who finds nanny with the cushion outside Joey's door, it is aunt Pen, who then has a heart attack and dies. Virginia is still in the hospital! Doesn't anybody check, if you can't trust Wikopedia there's no chance! 92.23.179.87 (talk) 23:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it, but you could've done that. This is Paul (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is wrong
Talk:The Children of Sanchez (book)

message: Note 1: the link to New York times review is broken. Note 2: I tried to put this at the proper place where the link is. However, Wikipedia does not support editing in android 4.2.1 (Chrome). Whenever placing the cursor in the right place, some JavaScript is moving it up to the top. It would be nice if mobile users could be supported!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.219.58.200 (talk) 12:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wicked Stepmother

message: Wicked stepmother 165.16.181.200 (talk) 13:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of lelo story wicked stepmother
Talk:The Whales of August

message: I've removed three quite well-written paragraphs from the plot summary. They're well written commentary or film criticism. As such they're not really suitable for Wikipedia because they represent an unsourced interpretation rather than summary of the plot.  This isn't a reflection on the quality of the writing or the validity of the observations. --Tony Sidaway 16:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What this intervention has achieved is to mean the plot summary only deals with the first part of the film, and fails to mention the resolution. I am sure that Tony Sidaway means well, but this hardly represents an improvement. 
--John Price (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Intifada of Independence

message: Cedar-Guardian added a "not verified" tag. but what is it that is not verified? both these uprisings have this name, and both are properly linked to. there is plenty of source material for each of them on the respective article pages. before i created the page, the link was dead: now we at least have a disambiguation page. i don't see the problem. Arre 22:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't notice that it was a disambiguation page. I thought it was a separate article about the term, which contained no sources. Anyway, I've removed the template and changed the page so it fits more the standard disambig page. CG 09:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: okay. thanks! Arre 09:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: not verified
Talk:How to Steal a Million

message: A sequence of famous ads for the Renault Cleo (I think) shown in Ireland & UK had a father daughter pairing almost certainly based on this movie. In particular, the phrase from the ad "Nicole! Papa!" is a direct quote. I've haven't search for external evidence so, as yet, it's not suitable for addition. However, I thought it was worth recording it here. --Malcohol 22:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicole! Papa! 

message: I would love to know more about this movie.  In particular, the fake Van Gogh.  Was it a real Van Gogh?  If not, who did paint it?  This is one of my favorite movies of all times, because it transcends it's genre.  It's a perfect genre movie -- mystery and romantic comedy.  And a movie that rises to existential questions, about the rich, about art and it's role in society, about artists, about how value art, and so on.  Wonderful.
:It's a fake Van Gogh. If you mean who painted it to be used as a prop in the movie, you might check the movie credits at the end of the film to see if anyone is named as the artist.PNW Raven (talk) 23:29, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical notes 
Talk:Rugrats Go Wild

message: In this edit I removed the alt titles from this article. There were 192,000 Google hits for "Rugrats Go Wild", compared to 7500 for "The Rugrats Movie 3" and 1800 for "The Rugrats Meet The Wild Thornberrys". Not significant enough to include these alts; represents undue weight to a minority usage. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed alt titles 

message: For the record, this article has been the object of vandalism, mainly by adding/changing the cast. See 
User talk:2602:30A:2C95:6B0:B892:616F:55E2:7C2E (currently blocked) and User talk:2602:30A:2C95:6B0:CD58:5B6:5F3F:2B97. Flami72 (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And again vandalized on Feb 8, by User talk: 2602:30A:2C95:6B0:E911:8FAC:B59C:221E, currently blocked. Flami72 (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Once more vandalized on Feb. 10, 2016 by User talk: 2602:30A:2C95:6B0:1046:F18:44A0:F8C, and quickly blocked. Flami72 (talk) 13:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is another IP who made similar false edits, although not to this article (and was blocked) in January 2016: User talk: 2602:30A:2C95:6B0:E17B:946F:9FC1:A338. All geolocate to Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Flami72 (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: The cast of characters for The Swan Princess is included in this article. However, I think that this list does not belong, as The Swan Princess appears to be a separate film. There is no mention of these characters in the imdb for Rugrats. (Also, at lease two of the Swan actors are incorrect: Dick Van Dyke is not "Speed", that is Steven Wright. John Cleese is "Jean-Bob", not Chris Pratt.)  I am removing the list of characters/actors for The Swan Princess, based on the above. Flami72 (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The Swan Princess

message: I'm protecting this page for 3 days due to repeated vandalism by an IP, along with the article for the first film. If it continues past that date, let me know. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protect 

message: Look. I wish I could find source on the MPAA G rating that was originally going to be given this movie before it was changed shortly prior to the release date. I mean, here’s proof from the teaser trailer that aired on Nickelodeon back in Spring 2003. Retrosunshine2006 🤗 01:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  MPAA rating.
Talk:They All Laughed

message: The article originally said the film was an "update" of La Ronde, but Peter Bogdanovich says it isn't.
"Question: Did you have La Ronde in mind when you came up with the idea? Some critics have compared your film to Ophuls’s.
Bogdanovich: La Ronde? No, I just thought it would be fun to make a movie about people that I knew and relationships and their complications. Although it was going to be a personal picture, I wanted to cloak it in something impersonal, because I wanted to play by the rules of the old Hollywood game. And so I came up with the concept of a group of detectives falling in love with the people they’ve been hired to follow."--45.178.176.26 (talk) 17:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''La Ronde'' Reference 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 07:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: They All Laughed →  – The Gershwin standard has a greater claim to historical prominence than the Bogdanovich film. This nomination proposes the creation of a They All Laughed disambiguation page that would list both 1937's They All Laughed (song) and 1981's They All Laughed (film). However, if consensus were to coalesce around dispensing with the dab page creation and simply exchanging WP:PRIMARYTOPIC so that the song is primary, I would also support that option. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 September 2022
Talk:The Inn of the Sixth Happiness

message: It's ages since I've seen tis film and I haven't seen the start, but I know she becomes a Chinese citizen and changes her name to jenai. This needs to be in this article. Katana Geldar 22:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change and Chinese citizenship 

message: I have noticed that there is no definate statement on whether the film is accurate the film is, it says a bit about the real person and that gives me an idea but I am not 100% sure if it is accurate. 86.179.14.253 (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone had added a line or two about historical (in)accuracy by the time I came along. I added some additional data on items that had been changed, with refs. I wanted to add something about this to the lede, but couldn't decide what to write without overstating it. What I've read of Aylward's reactions suggest she was incensed by how many liberties the filmmakers took... Lawikitejana (talk) 02:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: How historically accuracy is the film?

message: Within the article, the character "Lin Nan" is called "Colonel" four times and "Captain" once. But the corresponding IMDb article has "Captain" in the cast list and both titles in the plot summaries. I think the article should be edited to use one title throughout, but which is correct? PerlMonk Athanasius (talk) 03:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rank of Lin Nan

message: I believe the name of the Inn comes from Matthew 5:3-10, instead of the eight virtues… Heloiseeee (talk) 04:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the Inn