Talk:Revoltech

message: Done. --Nightshadow28 17:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 

message: Fist of the North Star Revoltechs are to be released. Evan1975 (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fist of the North Star 

message: Any evidence of seperate releases of the Gurren Lagann Revoltech? Judging by the promotional photos of Lazengann, the mini-drills and wingpack will be "Build a Figure" parts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.105.108.151 (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gurren Lagann Misc. 

message: Please don't do it.  People are just adding whatever number is next for TBA figures without any evidence whatsoever.  Same with release dates.  Please only add this when it has been CONFIRMED.  Otherwise, just use "TBA" in place of the series number or release date.  Enki may end up being #060, who knows, but right now we don't and it's pretty amateurish to just arbitrarily tack it on. GogDog (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrarily Adding Series Numbers and Release Dates 

message: I can't find any news to confirm the Big O figures listed under the 2G line. I think they may be fake additions  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.186.231.170 (talk) 22:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big O figures? 

message: * Revoltech Toy Reviews from CollectionDX
I'm saving this link at it is a possible source on the toy line. I'm not sure just how CollectionDX stacks up under the reliable source guidelines. —Farix (t | c) 21:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from external links 

message: Is there any need to have TWO links to the same site?
And also, propose removing all other links other than the official site, when the big list of figures is gone, theres really no need for links to shops / blogs reviewing them, unless noted in the article.  
EDIT: Removed, feel free to re-instate if there's a valid reason they were there.
Wallhead3004 (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Seen as most of the page has now gone, would it be worth merging this with the Kaiyodo article, which does make brief mention of it?
Wallhead3004 (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Suggestion 

message: Doesn't seem like anyone seems to be watching this page anymore, but as per what I have said in the Kaiyodo article, I am not against a list of Revoltechs by any means, but Wikipedia is a democracy, this should surely be back up for debate before it is reinstated?
Anyway, if it is to stay as it is, fair enough, but if it is going to be barebones like before, I believe a merge would be the best option. (Wallhead3004 (talk) 14:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the redirect. Whoever restored the article along with the tables did not comply with WP:NOT or establish the subject's notability. —Farix (t | c) 17:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Farix, I'm somewhat confused as to why this interpretation of the rules only applies to the Revoltech article. Why does it not apply to other toyline, TV shows, etc? Optimus Sledge (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CATALOG does apply to all articles. Just because there may be product lists on other articles doesn't mean that a product is appropriate here. (WP:OSE) —Farix (t | c) 01:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but it sets a precedent. Also, what part of WP:CATALOG do you think the list violated? I cannot see how it applies. Optimus Sledge (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinstated list