lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Algernon Percy, 1st Earl of Beverley

message: Removed Hon. George as it's neither fish nor fowl. He was Hon. from 1778-90 and Lord Lovaine from 1790-1830. Lord Beverly 1830-1865 and Duke '65-67. Re siblings sought a warrant of precedence as sons of a 'duke' as I see Hon. Charles + Emily - that should read Lord/Lady btw - all daughters would have become lady due to the 1790 earldom irrespective of seeking a warrant which raised charles to Lord. Alci12 19:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Give me some slack, I must have been tired at the time lol. Craigy (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Web vs. Internet

message: Does anyone else think that this should be merged as a section? If so, to Internet or World Wide Web, or include a mention in both? --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 19:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article is probably better suited to exist within either of the aforementioned articles as a section.  I wrote the article because there is some general and widespread confusion between the two terms. I hoped to clearly distinguish between the terms for those readers who really wanted to focus on that aspect. I'd be happy to do the merge once there is a consensus. Katalaveno 16:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Islam Shah Suri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:David Flusser

message: Maybe I'm misreading the article, but I don't see where anyone is accusing Flusser of being anti-Christian or where anti-Christianity has had any effect on his career. Thus, I'm not sure why that category is attached to this page. Suomi13 (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Christian sentiment
Talk:List of subdivisions of County Dublin

message: The Civil Parishes overlap the various Dublin Baronies, in some instances.
Each of the Civil Parishes are themselves composed of Townlands -although the identities and boundaries of such townlands in certain inner-city Dublin parishes are lost to us forever, if they ever existed.
Civil Parishes were amalgamated in the 19th Century to form "Poor Law Unions", which were the principal administrative units of the County prior to independence. They are indeed the basis for perhaps many of the approximately 3400 Electoral Divisions or of County Council Local Electoral Areas.
As of the 1899 Local Government Act, the County consisted of both Urban and Rural District Councils - the latter abolished in the 1930s for corruption.
The exact boundaries of Electoral Divisions ought to be visually available on a suitable computer format.
The County Dublin page ought to be formatted ("wikified"!!) to reflect the subdivisions of Dublin.
:The county no longer legally exists, see County Dublin. Djegan 19:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A useful page.  And to almost everyone in Ireland, I suspect County Dublin still does exist; the new administrative counties are just another bureaucratic layer.  I think Wikipedia has handled this correctly, with articles on both the historic county and the new legal situation.
The one change I suggest is checking the status of the items over; some should not be linked.  Most of the divisions of the Baronies still exist as areas, but some do not, and some have been divided.  So what was the large district of Clonturk is now Fairview, Marino and Drumcondra, for example, Baldoyle is now Donaghmede and Baldoyle, and Kilbarrack was split into Kilbarrack and Bayside.  
Some do exist, and just need articles, such as St. Margaret's, still there with its church and holy spring.  And some have been overcome by new phenomena, such as Cloghran, now industrial estates and Dublin Airport. 195.96.72.22 07:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kalachuris of Kalyani

message: When at the start 16 century kalchuris became engaged in the liquoir section thats why people call themselves kalwar and it become a caste in India 
Modern title name of kalchuris
Aarya
Ahake 
Aharval
Ahluwalia
Baranwal
Batham
Bhagat 
Bhoyar
Bhoyare
Billava
Bisane
Chauragade
Chaurewar
Chaudhary
Dadsena
Dahake
Daharwal
Dhapade
Dhapare
Dholakia
Dhuware
Diyewar
Dohare
Duvadhapar
Duve
Ezhava
Gangbhoj 
Gopalia
Gulhare
Gupta
Goud
Idiga
Jain kalar
Jain jaiswal
Jaisar
Jaiswal
Jamaiwar
Kalal  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darshankalal28 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Such claims, far-fetched as they are, will need to be supported by reliable sources.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 15:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  modern title name of kalchuris 

message: The article has been tagged for a split since July 2016. If no one has an objection, I'll separate the content about the "northern" and "southern" Kalachuris shortly. These two dynasties share a common name, but have otherwise nothing much in common. utcursch | talk 19:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Nayakas of Keladi

message: A very helpful book that partly deals with the Nayakas. It describes in great detail their reign, relations with the Portuguese, Konkani Catholics and the Roman Catholic Church. 
*
Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Remove the line "They were Veerashaivas (Lingayats)[2] but devoted to the Shringeri peetha."
Please remove this line "They were Veerashaivas (Lingayats)[2] but devoted to the Shringeri peetha.", as this statement doesnot have any proof. 
Reference book "^ A journey from Madras through the ... – Google Books. Books.google.co.in. Retrieved 2011-09-17." doesnot contain any information whether they were veerashaivas.
I hope wikipedia removes this statement which has no meaning and proof.
Balaji rajakumar (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you clarify, is the claim false, or are you only claiming the source does not support it? Monty845 21:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 5 November 2012 

message: As mentioned earlier,
Please remove this line "They were Veerashaivas (Lingayats) by faith.", as this statement does not have any proof.
Reference book "^ A journey from Madras through the ... – Google Books. Books.google.co.in. Retrieved 2011-09-17." does not contain any information whether they were veerashaivas.
Claim is false as the above reference book do not talk about caste of Keladi Nayakas at all. In fact in that reference book, no where author is talking about Keladi Nayakas.
I researched and found an evidence of Keladi Nayaka's caste, it is Bedar caste and is clearly mentioned in book "The Mysore Tribes and Castes" By L. Krishna Anantha Krishna Iyer (Diwan Bahadur). Below is the link for the book:
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=6EDcBSHGZaIC&pg=PA104-IA4&dq=keladi+nayak&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lvc5U4X5EojtrAeQ-YGQCA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=keladi%20nayak&f=false
Hope wiki keeps an updated and right information in its library. :)
Balaji rajakumar (talk) 23:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2014 
Talk:Thomas D'Alesandro Jr.

message: As structured, the article seems to give greater weight to D'Alesandro's time in Congress than as Mayor. This seems an odd decision especially as he, clearly, thought the latter position more important or he'd not have run for it and then resigned from the House having secured it. Unless there are objections, I propose to modify it thus. Czrisher (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering of Offices 

message: Seems a little editorial to me. Mathguyjohn (talk) 20:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Attempted to embarrass" 

message: Reference 5 is a dead link. The new version of the 1954 article is behind a registration wall.You have to give up an e-mail address to read past the first two paragraphs here:
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860626,00.html
I don't know how to fix this. Changing the dead link to the above does not lead to the first sentence of the Political campaigns section. I got a connection-timeout when I tried to register. The content is important, but is now unverifiable until https://secure.customersvc.com gets fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpfeil (talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference now behind paywall
Talk:Kirttivarman I

message: Revatidvipa and port of Goa are not same. Revatipvipa is modern day Redi which is now in modern Maharastra state.
Whereas port of Goa refers to Gopakapattana,which is modern day Old Goa and neighboring areas.
Nijgoykar (talk) 11:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Revatidvipa 
Talk:Kochchenganan

message: The proposal that this section be merged with Kochengat Chola is haphazard. This article is part of Tamil Kings series. And that one is religious series. They don't meet. If we merge this article there we will lose the chain here. And this has more details, this can be referred in 'See Also' section there. The proposal should be dropped immediately, its thoughtless. Proposer hasn't understood the placement of this article. 117.193.155.102 (talk) 16:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Haywire (character)

message: Hello. Part of this article was copied from the marvel.com website , so that stuff should be cut out. I'm too lazy to do it myself, sorry. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of this article was copied from marvel.com 

message: Haywire decided to stay in Earth 616 in the Avengers/Squadron Supreme Annual of 1998, and did not appear in NWO save for a flashback. WillE (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New World Order

message: The omnium link does not lead to a relevant topic. Varsho (talk) 01:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omnium Link
Talk:Krishna I

message: nothing like that on page 135-136: https://archive.org/details/VaisnavismSaivismMRS/page/n138/mode/1up?view=theater Dridhaprahara (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kamath appears to describe Krishna invoking Shiva as well as many other Hindu deities before prayers. I've changed it to overall "Hinduism" — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 12:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Krishna l become Shaivite
Talk:Krishna II

message: nothing like that on page 91: https://archive.org/details/VaisnavismSaivismMRS/page/n138/mode/1up?view=theaterDridhaprahara (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The source given for Krishna II a Shaivite is . How does your failure to find it in your citation negate this citation? Adakiko (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Krishna II become Shaivite
Talk:Kulothunga II

message: * Please replace the name 'Chola' (சோள) that means the name of an eatable grain, with 'Chozha' (சோழ) which means the name of a king and/or his dynasty.Helppublic (talk) 10:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

message: For a start "Vikrama Chola made his heir apparent and coregent" in English needs an explicit object (unlike some languages where the likes of "him" can be implicit). --SilasW 13:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit needed 

message: It should be Kulothunga Cholan, not Kulothunga Chola (without the N at the back).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arul20 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are Historic Tamil Names in Sanskrit / Devanagiri?
Talk:Racking bend

message: Just as an aside, ABOK shows the "Racking bend" #1462 with the first racking turn being taken toward the standing side of the bight, rather than the short end.  However The Ultimate Encyclopedia of Knots & Ropework by Budworth shows a knot very similar to the one currently illustrated by :Image:Racking Bend.jpg, with the first turn towards the short end.  When the article is expanded, a note on these variations should be made.  I have been unable to find any commentary regarding their relative merits. --Dfred 16:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Direction of first racking turn
Talk:John W. Maher

message: Not the Buzzcocks drummer then... Totnesmartin 18:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article does not have any references or cite any source and may be subjected to an AFD. Otr500 (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:History of Adjara

message: I replaced all instances of Adjaria and Ajara with Adjara, since that's the name used in the title of this article, and in Adjara.  I have not, however, replaced "Adjarian" with "Adjaran", since I do not know if that is necessarily correct.  If anyone thinks this should be changed as well, please feel free to change it. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 19:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjaria/Ajaria/Adjara 

message: How did Russia violate the timetable of the Istanbul commitments?? Alæxis¿question? 17:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It did, but does the article mention the word "violation"?--KoberTalk 17:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, apparently I haven't looked at the new version of yours (only at your edit summary :)). Alæxis¿question? 17:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation 
Talk:Scott Storch production discography

message: He claims he produced You Got Me on The Root's album Things Fall Apart!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=G7OxYBlTbKo
I never knew this, but I shall add!:) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.150.205.249 (talk) 02:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Got Me??? 

message: Definition of discograpgy is "a selective or complete list of phonograph recordings, typically of one composer, performer, or conductor". This does not include contributions of any sort, whether he played keyboard or turned a knob or gave advice. Please remove them from the discography. --78.86.117.164 16:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions are not related to the discography 

message: "Hustlinaire" I'm pretty sure is not produced by scott storch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yetm17 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hustlinaire by the moosie
Talk:Maharaja of Patiala

message: After the merger of the princely state of Patiala with the Union of India, there can not be any undemocratic ruler of Patiala, Maharaja or whatever it may be. In this article, it is claimed Amarinder Singh, who was actualy democratically elected as the Chief Minister of Punjab, as the current Maharaja and even a heir to the throne is also mentioned. There is no factual basis of these.Joy1963  Talk  05:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Maharajas in a democracy?

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Sayajirao Gaekwad III

message: please someone create family tree for gaekwads of baroda by this template: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Tree_list
It represents information better.
--Nizil (talk) 10:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I created family tree. Please improve it further if needed. --Nizil (talk) 17:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: famiy tree
Talk:Malaiyamān Thirumudi Kāri

message: unsourced, from category:
1. Vallal Paari vendhan
2. Valviloori
3. Thirumudi Kaari
4. Adhiyamaan Nedumaan Anji
5. Phegan
6. Aai
7. Nalli
articles, anyone?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Other patrons
Talk:Muhammad Adil Shah (died 1557)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Nahapana

message: The Jain works give the chronology of Avanti with Ujjain as the Capital. The works talk of Pradyota, Andhras (242 years) as also Nahapana (40 years). It is essential to give the reference. Somebody please provide. 
````Kishore Patnaik  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kishorepatnaik (talk • contribs) 18:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in Jain Works  

message: The Jain works give the chronology of Avanti with Ujjain as the Capital. The works talk of Pradyota, Andhras (242 years) as also Nahapana (40 years). It is essential to give the references, which are missing. 
I hope someone will know the references and provide the same.  
````Kishore Patnaik  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kishorepatnaik (talk • contribs) 18:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in Jain Works
Talk:Nandivarman II

message: The references at the moment are:
    * recently found inscriptions by ASI
    * Bahur, kasakudi, udieyendiram and tadantottam plates of Nandi varman
    * Hymns of alwar saints
Better references are needed.
Salilb (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak references 

message: The article uses many peacock terms to describe the historical figure in question. Also the references are not verifiable.
"recently found inscriptions by ASI" cannot be listed as a source. It does not have a link. Unclear information, the term "Previous mentioned enemy" is used multiple times, yet no specific information is provided on the same.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.119.207.66 (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses peacock terms to describe the person of interest. 

message: It is hard to believe that the ministers and officials could not find someone in the kingdom. I mean could they not find one, just one legitimate heir locally to ascend the throne? Looks like they had to find a reason to go on vacation to Bali, Thailand and other hot spots. On a more serious note, apart from traditional accounts, are there any epigraphs that record that the sovereign was born abroad?  Nittawinoda (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the foreign tour by officials?
Talk:Narendra Nayak

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comments 
Template talk:Condensed matter physics

message: I am dissatisfied with this current template.  What separates a phase from a phenomenon?  What is important to have in this template?  I wanted to link together the various topics in condensed matter physics, but I don't have a clear organizing principle.  For example, I think quasicrystals should be included, but I don't see how. Perhaps the APS March meeting sorting categories can be of help.  --WilliamDParker 21:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm concerned that the scientists section will grow out of control or be a misleading list.  Does anyone have an objective criterion for keeping the list manageably small?  Barring any persuasive comments or an indication of consensus in favor of keeping the scientists section, I will remove it.  --WilliamDParker (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding scientists? 

message: The current template includes under States of matter
Solid, Liquid, Gas, Plasma, Bose–Einstein condensate
Bose gas, Fermionic condensate, Fermi gas, Fermi liquid,
Supersolid Superfluidity Luttinger liquid Time crystal
These are not all of similar character. Some phenomena (Superfluidity) Some are just models (Fermi gas, Luttinger liquid) Some are wanna-bes (Supersolid, Time crystal). If we include these, we could just as well include many more.
For example degenerate matter claims to be a state of matter. I went to the list to show it's not: but then Fermi gas)
How about :
Solid, Liquid, Gas, Plasma, Other states of matter (redirecting to States of matter) Johnjbarton (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to streamline "States of matter"
Talk:731 Lexington Avenue

message: As discussed on the WP:COIN, my contributions to this article represent a COI as I am affiliated with Bloomberg L.P. I proposed these changes to an outside editor, DragonflySixtyseven, to get consensus before implementing any changes.
Major contributions include adding citations to the introduction paragraph, incorporating bulleted lists of Retail Tenants and Facts into Construction and Design and Tenants paragraphs. I added detail about the Bloomberg LP offices and the about the building's development and exterior design.
I am eager to continue to improve the article, so please let me know if you have any suggestions or feedback. Ordwayen (talk) 19:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 
Talk:Nayakas of Chitradurga

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Kamagethi dynasty. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 8#Kamagethi dynasty until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kamagethi dynasty" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of militaries by country

message: I propose removing subbranches from this table, as things such as the afghan national army commandos can be found on their own page. If anyone disagrees please mention here.Garuda28 (talk) 20:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There should be a limit, otherwise we could have sub-branches of sub-branches and perhaps even individual units listed here. Charles Essie (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, I have noticed to there is recently some add of sub branches etc I will check that. Nubia86 (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-branches 

message: ;Bigger military forces
 24.185.91.220 (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To make an edit request, you should post it in a "Please change 'X' to 'Y'" format and ensure that you also include sourcing for support. - wolf 08:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request on 10 November 2023