lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Salt Lake City Southern Railroad

message: Is this still operating separately, or is it a division of the Utah Railway? --NE2 16:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "On September 30, 1999 the SL became a subsidiary of the Utah Railway." according to the article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Why is the Utah Southern included in this article? The US and SLCS are two entirely different railroads with no relationship to each other. There's about a 60 or 70 year gap between the time when the US was abandoned and SL was incorporated.D&RGW 223 (talk) 14:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Question
Talk:Dome (geology)

message: yes, it should be merged. ReverendG 19:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Granite domes like Half Dome aren't formed by the deformation of strata, are they? I'm no geologist, but it appears (to this layman) that the photo illustrating the article is in direct contradiction to the definition of "dome" that we provide here. Can any real geologist clarify matters? 65.213.77.129 (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo of Half Dome

message: It appears that the first paragraph of this article ended up with 'backwards' information during the re-write at 02:16, April 14, 2014.
Specifically, the new version stated that the "strata which should become older from the centre of the dome outwards." This appears incorrect by comparison with the anticline page. I have made revisions to address this, and restored the reference that had been deleted at the time. Supasheep (talk) 23:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dome-->anticline-->lowest strata in the middle-->rocks are oldest in the middle 

message: I just wanted to comment that the language in this article is extremely technical and jargony, to a greater degree than related articles. It would benefit from a rewrite with general readers in mind. Zareksiegel (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical language
Talk:Butterfly perch

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Giant grouper

message: Autochthony writes.
For what it is worth, a c. 280 Kg (600+ lb) grouper was taken on tha BP Tanker off Brunei in 1986-7.
Use of a 5 ton (tonne) gantry crane meant that hoisting it in was no problem.
As landed on deck, it was over seven feet (2,1m) long, and its mouth looked 'big enough to swallow a shopping basket - sideways'.
Two fillets, each of over 50 Kg (a hundredweight) were taken off the dead fish.
Autochthony wrote.  2320z/6 November 2009.  86.151.60.238 (talk) 23:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Size?
Talk:Goldribbon soapfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Atlantic goliath grouper

message: :No, it's not, but I've never seen any well sourced reason for it being called a Jewfish.  I've seen a lot of ideas thrown around, everything from kosher requirements to the shape of the fish's head, but they're all just conjecture and would need good sourcing to produce something that wasn't original research.  Charles (Kznf) (talk) 16:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Assessed mid-importance for WikiProject Fishes because of conservation status.  Neil916 (Talk) 08:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I don't know if anyone's seen this article or not, but now there is a pacific and atlantic giant grouper, which were declared separate species http://www.livescience.com/animals/080821-goliath-grouper.html
Rename, and create new article with a disambiguation page? Or make it two parts of the same article?Bradenkeith (talk) 20:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Goliath grouper

message: "They grow to 15 feet and eat small reef sharks and barracuda and are not preyed on by other animals."
Then...
"Goliath grouper eat crustaceans, other fish, octopuses and young sea turtles. Grouper are preyed upon by large fish, such as barracudas, moray eels and large sharks."
I don't know what the correct answer is, but one of these is totally or both are somewhat inaccurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinnsa (talk • contribs) 03:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Internal Inconsistency

message: My father fished off the docks in Florida when he was a kid, back in the fifties.  While the smaller grouper may have been delicious, the really large old ones were riddled with various parasites so they were just for bragging rights.  RHD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.29.250.122 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considered of fine food quality 

message: It seems that this claim has no clear evidence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.56.221.14 (talk) 13:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any reliable evidence of goliath grouper attacking large lemon shark? 

message: I noticed this article lacks a range map.  Can one be added? Will (Talk - contribs) 06:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No range map? 

message: (Discussion moved to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fisheries_and_Fishing#Forceful_editorial_promotion_of_the_euphemistic_term_"harvesting" by author; please comment there. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Aaand here we go again.  as has been pointed out to you before, "harvesting" is bog-standard terminology. I don't really care about this one instance, but based on the rather embarassing circus you kicked off the last time you tried this, a year and a half ago, I foresee a jolly campaign of replacements all over WP if it is ignored. Thus: please get consensus here for your interpretation that "harvesting" is somehow a conspiratorial euphemism for killing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Forceful editorial promotion of the euphemistic and exploitative term "harvesting"
Talk:Redbanded perch

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which is compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Toadstool groper

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Catuaba

message: Wikipedia is not a repository for ads.
I found the reference for the quote from the Discovery journalist. It is available at , however, the webpage does not list the source for any of the scientific studies to which it alludes so the quote is dubious and possibly misleading. I'm not an expert on these situations on wikipedia so I would like to alert someone more knowledgeable to the situation and hopefully get it resolved.
sat (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk
Talk:Yellowbanded perch

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Rabbitfish

message: there seems to be an error. What is "sfasfpds" on the rabitfish page?
--72.22.148.183 (talk) 20:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Vandalism, has been corrected. RN1970 (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:Virginia Railway Express

message: I think we could do with a map of the lines on here.  Any takers?--Velvet elvis81 23:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?

message: I seen some Virginia Railway Express cars/coaches on the new haven line of metro north (here in ny)? Preceding unsigned comment was added by User:68.198.203.250 at 14:45, 21 July 2007
:To answer this longstanding question, those coaches were bought by the Connecticut Department of Transportation for use on the Shore Line East service. The anon probably saw them in transit, or when they first went into use, before they got repainted. oknazevad (talk) 03:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  See Mafersa coaches 2.31.67.126 (talk) 12:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: VRE coaches in NY?

message: The Northern Termini of both VRE lines is at Union Station (Washington, D.C.). So why do all the routeboxes indicate that they terminate at Union Station (Washington Metro)? ----DanTD (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Northern Terminus

message: As an employee of VRE, I know for a fact that the logo is a violation of our registered trademark and was fraudulently made. There is a slight "tail" of an image on the bottom left side. The words "Railway" and "Express" are not centered in the logo. The hash marks separating the words are different sizes. Does anyone know how I go about reporting this and how I post the proper image? VRE (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation

message: This article, as well as all individual VRE station articles need opening dates. As we can see with Franconia-Springfield (WMATA station) and all stations that pre-date the Virginia Railway Express, we can't just assume all VRE stations were built in 1992. ----DanTD (talk) 05:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More station opening dates needed
Talk:Australian barracuda

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Split-T

message: Just acquired a copy of Secrets of the "Split T" Formation. I do not want to mass edit this article, but I am going to slowly clean out the junk. Some notes offhand. I can't confirm the "fast break" language with this book. Line splits depended on the front, and ranged from 10 to 16 feet in total. The book contains nice pictures of the front versus the defense of the times.
In the main sequence of plays (handoff, keeper, pitch), there is one onside defender who is not blocked. There is a later play in which two onside defenders are not blocked (the power play) but that's not the main option sequence. I'm wondering if the two onside blocker language was taken from a book on the veer.
The split T formation is usually a full T backfield. The split in the name refers to the line splits, to be sure. In Chapter 12 Don introduces what he calls the flanker offense, but this is a later wrinkle in the concept. He notes in particular that the flanker offense is a great way to counter the nine man fronts of the day, the 5-4-2, the 6-3-2, and the 7-2-2. Dwmyers (talk) 03:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Faurot's book 

message: I own Bernie Bierman's 1937 coaching tome, Winning Football, and there is no mention of the T formation in it. It only mentions the single wing. I see no sign of Bierman using the T.
This can be confirmed by reading accounts of Bud Wilkinson's time as a player with Bernie Bierman. Bud played blocking back for Bierman, also described as a quarterback. You don't equate blocking back and quarterback in a T formation. Dwmyers (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernie Bierman (Minnesota coach) and the T
Talk:Medical value travel

message: I would support the merger of this article with the medical tourism article, and that medical tourism become the name of this particular subject. Medical value travel is 188 hits on a Google search while Medical tourism has more than 83 million. Seems Medical value travel isn't really catching on as the term for this trend. On both searches, by the way, the Wikipedia entry came up first. Both articles need to be rewritten and condensed, with greater attention to given to references and citations, as well as wikification throughout. Also I wonder if Medical tourism in Thailand and the oddly named Medical Tourism India should also be merged with the medical tourism article? -Wisekwai 20:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Rock and Roll All Nite

message: This article needs to be cleaned up for clarity purposes. The studio verson of the single only charted at #68 (I think). It was the live version of the single from Alive! that became a big hit for the band, not the studio version. The article should point that out so that the reader doesn't get confused by the information.
As a suggestion, I would think that it would be beneficial to list both singles in the article and distinguish the respective chart success between the two and the history of the song itself. Darwin's Bulldog 20:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rock and Roll All Nite

message: The title was changed to "Rock 'n Roll All Nite" when the correct title of the page (and of the song) is "Rock And Roll All Nite." You can clearly see this in the image of the record and on the back cover of Dressed to Kill (which I have, by the way). Thoughts? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tony lion (talk • contribs) 22:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The Smashes, Thrashes & Hits version does not have a guitar solo. NewPasha 19:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I removed it. Relrel (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitar solo

message: There is no reason why there needs to be a separate article for Poison's cover of this song. The information needs to be merged into this article. -Xnux the Echidna 22:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: the image of the picture sleeve is some obscure import, why is it the main image used for the song?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.30.8.252 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  image 

message: The chart performance section implies that the song eventually charted at number twelve when in fact that was the concert version. Can that be corrected? Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart performance 

message: The version on the convoy soundtrack is not kiss 174.215.161.110 (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convoy soundtrack
Talk:Atlantic, Mississippi and Ohio Railroad

message: Was this road at one time ? Peter Horn User talk 14:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just over a year later and still no answer. Peter Horn User talk 22:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track gauge 
Talk:Oligodendroglioma

message: I'm a bit taken back by this article. I was diagnosed with a level 3 Oligodendroglioma when I a hundred years old. I began having seizures 3 years prior to that day. I never had to undergo any radiation therapy or anything. I never had any recurrence. I am 30 years old at this point. Is the information reported accurate? Why is it so difficult to resect the tumors 100%?
:Oligodendrogliomas are like white paint in a bucket with red paint - the tumor cells blend diffusely with normal brain tissue, and a surgical resection only allows for total or subtotal removal of what it visually or radiologically visible, leaving behind tumor cells that are "invisible" at the time of surgery. --Lipothymia (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:5/42 Evzone Regiment

message: I'm not sure about the credibility of the articles listed as references (in Yeni Haber and Yeni Asir). They amount to nothing more than unsubstantiated rants about the Greek Army (and the Armenians) being responsible for the burning of Smyrna. It's propaganda, at best, and should be taken out. Dragases (talk) 13:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for Atrocities 

message: This is a blatant lie, or at best misinformation coming from a biased and poorly informed person.
If ELAS started as an initiative from the CP, it very quickly got out of its grasp, and was acting outside the 
dogmas of the soviet emanating doctrines of the Party. Very early on there were tensions between the rebels of the Mountain
and the technocrats of Athens. ELAS could at best be "labeled" as anarcho-communist and adapted to the needs and moors
of the mountainous regions it was based in. An example was the fact that it tolerated religious practices and popes amongst
its ranks (as long as no religious hierarchy with conflicting interests would appear), which was in direct opposition with the
CP's doctrines, but adapted to the people of the country that weren't Soviet University graduates... 
I recommend the reading of D. Eudes "The Kapetanios" book, which is one of the most thorough accounts of the Greek Resistance and 
civil War.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.195.118.82 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ELAS under the control of the Communist Party
Talk:Men's Recovery Project

message: [  As thrilling as it is to be included in someone's encyclopedia, this entry was inaccurate and far too long.  "Seminal" can refer to Chuck Berry, or Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. The word has no business being in the same sentence with Men's Recovery Project. Likewise, the phrase "critically acclaimed" was simply not correct. As a matter of principle, the entire entry was shortened. If Kabrewskee or Hineyhole or any of you other guys have a problems with this, my email address remains sam@sammcpheeters.com. ]
Thank youZeelog  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.164.37.128 (talk) 10:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

message: * https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/arts/music/article/13016827/blurred-edges
czar 17:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 