Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Health and fitness

message: Dear Colleagues, 
Hopeful you might be willing to provide a review for this AfC for Dr. Vin Gupta, NBC News's primary health policy/COVID-19 medical analyst. He's on primetime television almost daily, and has been so for almost 2 years, so thought it was important to address this gap so viewers would be informed.
Link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vin_Gupta
Thank you in advance for your time. 
Caroline  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caroline grossman23 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Vin Gupta/NBC & MSNBC Medical Analyst AfC 

message: Hi all, as the heading says, does this project work on sport science pages as well? DannyHatcher (talk) 00:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this include sports science? 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Nestlé boycott#Requested move 18 March 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 02:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Nestlé boycott#Requested move 18 March 2022]] 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:No poo#Requested move 2 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:No poo#Requested move 2 August 2022]] 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: A new user thinking themselves to be notable created Draft:Jonathan Govette and approached WP:Teahouse insisting they are notable. By Wikipedia standard and policies prima facie that seem improbable. But it would be on safer side that some regular editor from medicine or health reviews the draft.  Bookku    (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A draft review request 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Physical therapy#Requested move 29 December 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Physical therapy#Requested move 29 December 2023]]