Talk:Anguillidae

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: This article could be improved by talking about the general life cycle of the eels. In addition it might be more advantageous to talk about migration patterns of this family of eels. 
Several more updated pictures could be added to this site along with more broken up specialized descriptions.
Eyster.18 (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Improvements

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anguillidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706014923/http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/MBA_SeafoodWatch_UnagiReport.pdf to http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/cr_seafoodwatch/content/media/MBA_SeafoodWatch_UnagiReport.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Shouldn't this be "Anguilla (genus)" as, since Anguillidae is, according to the article, a monotypic family, Wikipedia guidelines strongly recommends moving it to the lowermost taxon (i.e., at the genus level)?  Or, split into two separate pages, since there are extinct genera in Anguillidae.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If we accept that the extinct genus Anguillidarum is both valid and a member of the family Anguillidae, then the family is not monotypic. As it appears now to be polytypic, the bulk of this article should be moved to Anguilla (genus), and a new family article written, or at least a stub to mention the two genera. Loopy30 (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Move back to ''Anguilla'' (genus)

message: The ICZN's Opinion 1672 (1992), put "Anguilla Schrank, 1798" on the Official List of Generic Names in Biology. However Welter-Schultes & Klug (2009) argue that the rediscovery of de Garsault's 1764 book shows he should be the authority, and that the Official List should be corrected. Others have followed in having Garsault, 1764 be the authority including Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes, but I wasn't able to find out if the Plenary Powers have officially emended the Official List -- does anyone know if there's been an official Opinion relating to this?
 
Umimmak (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anguilla authority?