Talk:1790 United States census

message: They do not work. 99.230.152.143 (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue links 

message: and greater Philidelphia was 4 square miles big and had 44,096 there was no greater new york area newyork had no suburbs adn only measured at best 2 miles big so rank NYC 2nd like it rightfully was
rank Philidelpih higher than Newyork city by including northern liberties and south wark "southern liberties" both of these towns were close to one mile big and also massachusetts had 51,202 people classified as urban in 1790 so mention that also —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.211.9.198 (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranking

message: I would correct but I do not know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.36.121 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the table and it was working fine, sorting the content properly, numerically.  It appears as if, in the course of the last five years, an anonymous hero has corrected this error for the page. CarlsonC (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The  sort of "Totals" is not a numberical sort but is done on the leading digit. [[Special:Contributions/71.126.36.121|71.126.36.121]] ([[User talk:71.126.36.121|talk]]) 15:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 1790 United States Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2020 United States Census which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 22:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Before my one edit today, which changed only the Massachusetts figure in the "Total" column, there were the following discrepancies in the article's table of states and territories:
# Delaware: 59,094 is 2 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; this is explained in a footnote to the table.
# Massachusetts: 387,787 is 9,000 more than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
# New Hampshire: 141,801 is 84 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
# Vermont: 85,529 is 10 less than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
# National total: 3,964,905 is 32,176 more than the sum of the appropriate columns; what is the explanation?
President Lethe (talk) 22:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies 

message: If you check the source provided it shows data for 1790 with a large spike as those other towns are lumped in, before returning to its actual population of around 5000 seen in 1782 and in 1800. I suggest a note here since this distorts the importance of Norwalk in Connecticut at the time 87.210.242.77 (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwalk 1790 census includes both stamford and greenwich, hence its inflated population.  

message: When an item is available from both locations, which should we link to? I accidentally duplicated the Virginia one at Archive.org. I like to saw logs! (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Books vs. Archive.org