lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:When I Need You

message: anyone else notice that the tune for this is the same as leonard cohen's "Famous Blue Raincoat"? --86.154.35.239 (talk) 16:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think Cohen's right about the motif being an old one.  "Little Jeannie" also uses it. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Leo Sayer's single was released in 1976, not 1977.
All pictures of the labels in various releases (especially UK an US) are print with (c) 1976 on them.
You can easily check it out on all sleeves/labels sites, e.g. https://www.discogs.com/master/112484-Leo-Sayer-When-I-Need-You
I think you should revise the release year. Gpsarras (talk) 19:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release year 

message: Please help me im football player my place forward thanks 196.190.32.27 (talk) 07:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forward
Talk:Rangpur

message: Is there any reason why we are blanking out the article and talk page and now redirecting it to Rangpur_City yet again.Jguard18 Critique Me 12:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Question 

message: See Talk:Rangpur, Bangladesh/Archive 1#Primary topic for Rangpur – wbm1058 (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic for Rangpur 
Talk:Sherwood Lett

message: The prior version of this article stated Lett participated in the D-Day landings, which was supported by the UBC Senate Memorial Tributes reference. As Lett was commander of 4th Bde., Canadian 2nd Div. from 27 Feb 1944 to 18 Jul 1944 (see Stacey reference) this would be impossible. Canadian 2nd Div. did not participate in the D-day landings and did not mobilize to France until early July 1944. Lett was wounded by enemy mortar fire on 18 Jul 1944, the first day of 4th Bde's first action in Normandy (Operation Atlantic).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katy biker (talk • contribs) 07:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-Day Participation 
Talk:When the going gets tough, the tough get going

message: I've substantially cut back and rewritten the article, removing a major section that was pure, unsourced WP:OR, and adding new information about earliest attestations from the 1950s sourced to a new, and apparently solid reference. This new source, however, is WP:TERTIARY, and thus should be replaced by proper WP:SECONDARY sources.  Fortunately, this may not be as difficult as might otherwise be the case, since this tertiary source itself lists two secondary sources which should be tracked down and added to the article, replacing the current ref. The improved state of the article is such that the 2017  tag is no longer needed per WP:WTRMT, and so I removed it.  Mathglot (talk) 08:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: It seems doubtful if this topic will ever gain enough content to be more than a stub, which would mean it fails WP:NOPAGE. Perhaps it should be considered for transwikification to Wikiquote? Mathglot (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a 1953 quotation at q:Motivation (which it appears Mathglot added, so thank you), and an entry at wikt:when the going gets tough, the tough get going. I suggest soft redirect to the latter with . Cnilep (talk) 02:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transwikify?
Talk:Cherat

message: I have added details to the history and location section based on the details from Encyclopædia Britannica entry
please do not add unknown personals names and try to put some valuable information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.249.238 (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Details from Encyclopædia Britannica

message: Whats behind the name? Lalzamin (talk) 00:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Where Have All the Cowboys Gone?

message: weretheyintendedSARCASTICALY?(fe.idothelaundryugetabeeretc,orjusplaingoodHILBILYlore??81.11.206.37 (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  lyrix 

message: Is there a completely separate version of this song that has backing vocals during the main stanzas (not the chorus) which are specifically sung in a bright major key as a sort of counterpoint?  I heard this several times on a Jack FM UK station but I remember that the US radio version vocals aren't as dissonant and use the original song keys.  This makes me wonder if there are different releases of this song. -Rolypolyman (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate version with different backing vocals 

message: I'm curious about whether the similarities between this song and Tracy Chapman's Fast Car have ever been officially written/spoken about. They basically tell the same story--young woman marries a guy with a nice car, with hopes and dreams about the future, only to get disillusioned as he fails to live up to her expectations and instead spends his time getting drunk at the bar. 71.231.130.9 (talk) 23:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where Have all the Cowboys Gone vs. Fast Car
Talk:Whoomp! (There It Is)

message: Moved reference to Obama and Matt Wilkening to the popular culture reference section. Deleted diaper commercial reference for lack of citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.147.139.184 (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned article 

message: I distinctly remember seeing a TV news report when this song came out about a woman who was gang raped by a group of men who were chanting the lyrics/chorus of this song at her as they did it, and a lot of subsequent bad press over the incident. Unless my mind is playing tricks on me, this clearly warrants addition into the article, but only if properly cited. TheGoonSquad 11:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative Press/Rape 

message: at 1:01.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.193.239.159 (talk) 21:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's an internet rumor about a man who sort of looks like Obama. I think it might take something more definite. NegativeK (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barack Obama is in the video
Talk:Winchester Cathedral (song)

message: Is there any documentation for a connection with Martin Biddle? Pustelnik (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It might more likely be a connection to Birthe Kjolbye Biddle, who was then supervisor of the Cathedral excavations  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.128.83 (talk) 23:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Martin?

message: Íou can find this song in the Youtube even from 1911 (machine player) ZJ (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 
Talk:NRG (file format)

message: If I am correctly informed the .NRG format is either compatible or just an alias for .ISO. I know for a fact that tools that never heard of .NRG can burn these files perfectly after renaming to .ISO Forget that, there seems to be a slight difference --RobIII 15:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your point being? And DAEMON Tools can't burn NRGs since DTools isn't a burning application. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Confirmed! More recent versions of Nero seem to use a different file structure of the nrg format directly based on ISO. Applications like VirtualBox however detect incorrect sizes for an pure iso and hence refuse loading them. Removing the nrg footer (less than 512 byte if i remember right) however fixes the behavior. --78.53.87.214 (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Confirmed too! The article should be modified - more recent .nrg files may actually be iso9660 type so that ubuntu's archive manager reads it directly when renamed to .iso! So the statement that .nrg is always a proprietary format of Nero is NOT true!! GrAndrew (talk) 08:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

message: Removing notability and overly detailed tags. The measure of notability of a file format is the list of programs which can read/write it. And the one provided in the article is quite extensive. And the description of a file format is useless without the provided details. If someone searches for the .nrg format he is either interested to find a program which can read it or how to read it (that's why the implementations details are important) and this article covers both cases. GL1zdA (talk) 13:33, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and overly detailed
Talk:Ephebos

message: Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (10th edition) does not observe 'ephebi' as plural of 'ephebe' but of 'ephebus'. If we claim that 'ephebi' is the English plural, we ought to say that 'ephebus' is the singular. Saying 'ephebe' is the singular, we ought to say that 'ephebus' is the singular.
Being personally opposed to archaic plurals and Latin intermediates of Greek words, I am going to edit the article to give 'ephebe' (pl. 'ephebes') as the English, noting 'ephebus/ephebi' are alternatives.
Agemegos 07:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Ignorance of three languages' 

message: I don't think anywhere enough emphasis is given to the Ephebes as a body of young men under going their military training after their citizenship is confirmed, especially after 338. For a description of this institution see Aristotle, Athenian constitution 42, but also the inscription of the Athenian ephebic oath SEG xxi 519 that's also documented in Rhodes and Osbourne Greek historical Inscriptions 404-323 BC (2003), document 88, and the inscriptions IG II 2 1156, SEG xxxvi 155, SEG xli 47, Reinmuth 8, 9, 10, 12 & 13, and SEG xxxi 162 all supplying lists of ephebes and awards given to them and their sophronistes. At least, from the 330s onwards all (most?) boys who are Attic citizens and of hoplite status (i.e. just over half the citizen body) undergo this training for two years (supplying the city and border defenses for Attic territory in their second year).
GermanicusCaesar (talk) 03:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ephebic military institution of Athens
Talk:HMAS Gawler (J188)

message: I have a photo of the Battle Honour board for the HMAS Gawler that was taken shortly after I made it at the Williamstown Naval Dockyard (NDW) as a Ships Joiner. I would like to have it uploaded /posted and possibly acknowledge me as the maker. I believe there may be only five people left in Australia that was given the honour to make one of these boards the other four made several as part of a program in the early to mid 1980's to update the stocks of these battle Honour Boards for new and existing ships.Trebor12 (talk) 02:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMAS Gawler 
Talk:Flying Spaghetti Monster/Archive 4

message: I have requested a review of this article at Good Article Review.  I don't believe this article meets the criteria for the reasons discussed immediately above this section.MikeURL 23:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see this page reach FA status. It would raise awareness of FSM and it's just a fun article to begin with. RAmen, Demosthenes 18:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review

message: Greeting all. I am in the process of writing the page Science humour, and am trying to decide whether to add a section on "Anti-anti-science humour". If I do, FSM, etc., would be listed, as a humorous attempt to combat anti-science/luddism (I know, I know, it's not a humorous attempt, may His noodly appendages touch you). Granted, there is a fine line between anti-anti-science (FSM) and anti-religion/anti-dogma (Discordianism). Hrm. Well, anyway, could you pop over to the Science humour talk page, and tell me what you think?  Cheers, samwaltz 19:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New page: Science humour

message: The board never mandated the teaching of intelligent design.  The resolutions it passed were aimed at including what it deemed 'the problems' with evolutionary theory in science class.  It was supported by ID advocates, but it was not an ID resolution.  I have changed the line in the first paragraph to reflect this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FelixRex (talk • contribs) 14:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, it was ID for all intents and purposes. See our articles on the subjects. Just because it wasn't called ID, doesn't make it not ID. JoshuaZ 16:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the reliable sources DO call it ID.MikeURL 01:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kansas State Board of Education 

message: There is a mini-billboard of the FSM somewhere in Baltimore, MD. I think it was off of Falls Rd. or Cold Spring La. Every time I go by, I forget to bring my digital camera. If some other WP editor is out that way please try to snap a pic before it goes away... and under it it says "BELIEVE" which is Baltimore's motto lately. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 17:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baltimore mini-billboard 

message: Anyone else think the spagetti monster is Cthulu-esque?
:It's not eldritch enough.--Alf melmac 21:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lovecraftian?
Talk:Unsung Heroes

message: This is a very messy and confused article.For one thing the film is actually called "Unknown Heroes".I see the character Louis is variously
called in the article "Louise" and "Lewis".First I knew that character of
Louis is meant to have an Irish and working class background,what is the
source.
My understanding was that the character was meant to symbolise contradictions between US imperialism and British imperialism and anti
US feeling in the UK.--  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.51.251 (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A poor and confused article
Talk:Black Tooth Mountain

message: 'Black Tooth Mountain is one of the hardest mountains to climb in the Bighorns'
The difficulty of climbing the mountain is subjective, if one were to mention it, one should most likely add 'many consider it to be' alongside some citations to notable people who mention it is difficult to climb. TrueOracle (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of the article feels like a personal judgement of the mountain rather than a scientific or stat based analysis, plus limited citations
Talk:Capital Tower, Cardiff

message: Explosion?
Despite Detective Scrots being a fictitious character Capital Tower, Cardiff was in fact damaged by an explosion during the 1980s. For that reason I have reverted the page, minus the Family Guy reference, to my earlier revision.
83.100.214.193 08:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page here has some interesting claims about a mass grave and the body of Llywelyn Bren being excavated for the foundations. EdwardLane (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black death graves 
Talk:Adrian Dominican Sisters

message: Pretty well-written article IMO. Almost no bias (POV) which is remarkable. Like most Catholic articles, it really needs to try to eliminate the "Mother Sally did this" explanation, and allow the order to do things.Or just state that they got done. This is more true now than years ago when the Mothers-Provincial and -General had a lot more power. That is, the emphasis should be on the order not on people. Some of these people, Mother Gerald in particular, should have their own articles IMO. Their accomplishments can be noted there. Student7 (talk) 21:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Critique
Talk:Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne

message: HAWTHORNE, NY: Hawthone, NY is named after Rose, not her father Nathaniel. The only handy source i have is the Article on the village here in wiki.
:Hello and thanks for the comment. There is no citation for the line in the article for Hawthorne, New York, and, as such, it is not verifiable to a reliable source. When one is found, we can make both articles accurate. I'll look when I have time. --Midnightdreary (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of town
Talk:Third Order of Saint Dominic

message: I've added a  and a  at two places, where the official attitude of the Catholic church of that time is presented as undisputed facts in a way that I think is misleading. Both refer to the formation of military forces, directed against the albigensians. Taken together, they describe a church which had to take to arms, in order not to be military vanquished by the cathars.
This is surely an historically correct description of the official motives for forming the military orders; but it is, expressed mildly, highly disputed from a factual point of view. In fact, I believe that there is a consensus among historians to the effect that the cathars were subjected to military attacs from forces under the banners of the Catholic church, rather than the other way around. If you disagree with this opinion about the consensus, you should probably wish to rewrite the section Catharism#Suppression, to begin with.
Actually, I think that rather small changes would remove this POV (and without having to enter into any discussion about who in reality threatened whom with a military annihilation). It should be possible to refer to claimed or perceived threats against the church. The implications of a military threat in the subjugate statement
:...demanding physical force with which to restrain equally material opposition
could simply be removed, or a source describing the reasons like this could be provided, with an explicit quotation.
Please note that I am not disputing that the catharism was a "threat" against the Catholic church, in the same manner as protestantic movements to-day threaten the Catholic hegemony in some parts of Latin America. For the 13'th century popes, I guess that this would be an unacceptable threat. I dispute the implied claims in the present article, that there is a consensus among historians, considering this as a military threat. JoergenB (talk) 17:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to find the author of the formulations in the history. After a bit of work I could trace it back to the Catholic Encyclopaedia.  This does give one possible source to quote for the opinion that the church was military threatened by the cathars.  However, I believe that that encyclopaedia is slightly outdated in some of the opinions expressed there; and some care should be taken to check whether it coincides with official opinions of the Catholic church today.  I know that the church has revised its view on the necessity of anti-Jewish actions somewhat; I do not know whether the same holds for its anti-heretics actions. JoergenB (talk) 12:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some minor POV formulations.
Talk:Nettime

message: changes: Ted Byfield was linked to wrong Ted Byfield (no page for the professor of art). Ricardo Dominguez was also linked to the wrong person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.49.189 (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: While it has its fascinating aspects, does the membership list belong in this article? At a minimum, I would propose dropping all red-linked and dab-linked entries. Is there a reliable source for the list?  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:32, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: After more than a year with no response, I am under the impression that this is not a closely watched paged. If the current list has been useful to you, then I wouldn't object to keeping it. But the question about verifiability remains. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 18:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership list 

message: So I just undid a big change someone had made. They essentially deleted all the text. Insofar as "This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia.", and given nettime's legacy, I think the 11,000 byte reduction without discussion was unwarranted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.23.98 (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Bulk of Page
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Thermal lance/Housekeeping

message: :Continued from User talk:Eyrian#Uses of thermal lances in fiction.
The section Thermal lance#Appearances in fiction has been present since 1 January 2006 without anyone feeling strongly enough about it to delete it. User:Eyrian deleted it at 10:14, 13 June 2007 without discussion. I reverted this deletion with edit comment "Rv deletion of "in fiction" section, or please discuss". Eyrian re-deleted it. I transferred the discussion from the edit comments to User talk:Eyrian#Uses of thermal lances in fiction. I felt that mediation or arbitration is better than an edit war. But many pages about real technology have a "use in fiction" section.
Eyrian said in User talk:Eyrian#Uses of thermal lances in fiction that he has been deleting such sections whenever he finds them. But such sections are interesting to many people. And the section under dispute has been there for 17 months: it is not a new addition.
Anthony Appleyard 05:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Moved from main RfM page]

message: Greetings!
I would like to thank you all for agreeing to Mediation. Taking that first step by agreeing to work together to solve a dispute is a major step in the process, as it shows a commitment to finding a solution desirable by all.
A few clarifications about what's going to happen:-
*I'm going to search for a comprimise for this article only. Anthony suggests, in the statement above (which I moved from the main RfM page), that Eyrian has done this in other places. However, mediation would not be effective for every article, and as such we'll be focusing on just the Appearances in fiction section in Thermal lance.
*If you honestly don't think that you'll accept a comprimise version (ie. you know what you want, and refuse to budge on anything less), than this whole procedure will be pointless. I need to help you two work towards a version of that section which meets both your approval.
*Formalities: Mediation will take place here. I'm a member of this Committee. However, if one of you two don't want me to take this case, for whatever reason (or no reason in particular), that's fine. We need optimal circumstances for mediation to work, and if a party isn't happy with the mediator for whatever reason, then it may not work. If I could just get you to say 'agree' or 'disagree' to my mediation below (where the ...'s are), that'd be great.
**I'm open to your mediation. --Eyrian 06:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anthony, do I have your assent? Daniel 06:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. (Sorry, I thought that my agreement is already in Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Thermal lance#Parties' agreement to mediate.) Anthony Appleyard 08:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was more asking whether you were fine with me in particular being the mediator. Now that that's sorted, let's get going. Daniel 08:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine. Anthony Appleyard 08:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Rupicapra

message: What a weirdly written bonkers article. There's no mention whatsoever of what the Apennine Chamois is. The article just starts talking about this animal completely out of context, as if the article was specifically about that species. It's as if it was at third animal altogether.  212.97.248.104 (talk) 18:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Apennine chamois