lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yaqub al-Mansur

message: 105.66.129.28, I'll repeat again, please do not add information to the infobox or to the article without citing reliable sources, as required by Wikipedia:Verifiability. The birth place is not known unless there are reliable sources that say so. Please do not edit-war by repeating your edits after they are already reverted; this is not how edits are accepted on Wikipedia, see WP:CONSENSUS. 
Aside from this recent edit-warring, the 1160 birth date also appears to be unsourced and should be removed. R Prazeres (talk) 03:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth info
Talk:Murad III

message: * Caliph Info under the Image is missing.Ugur Olgun 19:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Caliph Info..?

message: Please have a look, Fahriye's birthday, also her mother was not safiye, also Fatma was not safiyes daughter only Ayshe.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020421153434/http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Turkey/turkey5.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nalanidil (talk • contribs) 01:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: This article relies quite a bit upon Özgen Felek's thesis, 'Re-creating image and identity'. Now this may very well be a totally reliable source and the information in the article may all be accurate, but given how it's a Ph.D. thesis it would be good for editors to verify whatever they can with other modern scholarly sources as well. Chamboz (talk) 03:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Source 
Talk:Ahmed I

message: I have added back the paragraph on Ahmed I's military exploits—which was moved by OttomanReference to another article—on the grounds that this article, Ahmed I, should not neglect information relevant to the subject/person covered. The article is (at least at the current time) short enough that it is not overwhelming the reader, which is the general reason to start shunting information off to other articles (v. Wikipedia:Long article layout), and any reader coming to this page and wishing to find here any information directly relevant to Ahmed I should—I believe—be able to find it here. —Saposcat 06:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Changes

message: ত Azamvai (talk) 21:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ত
Talk:Mustafa I

message: == Mustafa's mother ==
Name of Mustafa's mother is not known. Maybe she was a certain Fuldane Sultan, but most probably not Handan Sultan. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Name of Mustafa's mother is not known. Maybe she was a certain Fuldane Sultan, but most probably not Handan Sultan. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mustafa's mother
Talk:Osman II

message: I have added back the paragraph on Osman II's military exploits—which was moved by OttomanReference to another article—on the grounds that this article, Osman II, should not neglect information relevant to the subject/person covered. The article is (at least at the current time) short enough that it is not overwhelming the reader, which is the general reason to start shunting information off to other articles (v. Wikipedia:Long article layout), and any reader coming to this page and wishing to find here any information directly relevant to Osman II should—I believe—be able to find it here. —Saposcat 06:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Changes

message: You can't just paste a translation of Tuği's primary source account into the article as if it's fact to be relied upon. Tuği was a janissary, and thus a partisan of the group which killed Osman II. Posting a primary source like this means encouraging the reader of the article to do Original Research, which is not the goal of Wikipedia. The rules say you can't post long quotes from primary sources. Tuği has been analyzed by numerous modern historians, it would be more appropriate to provide an analysis of his account based on modern historians. See for instance Gabriel Piterberg's 2003 study, An Ottoman Tragedy: History and Historiography at Play. Chamboz (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuği's Account 

message: This has been directly translated and not copied and pasted as accused. Secondly, this account is unbiased and an actual eye witnessing account, whilst the accounts written by western sources are based on " what they have heard ". This is a Turkish account and it should be included on the page so a different account is also read. Various Turkish historians have used this account in their works of Sultan Osman. I do not understand how you can continue to delete such a historical account very easily! Allow people to read a variety of accounts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baburhan 1 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: From Gabriel Piterberg, An Ottoman Tragedy: History and Historiography at Play, (2003), 67. Chamboz (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuği's Account 

message: I cannot understand why it is not admitted that Osman II's mother was "Valide Sultan" during his reign. His enthronement portrait also features Mahfiruz Hatice Sultan, her son ascending the throne in 1618, and Mahfiruz dying in 1620 or 1622. 2A04:2411:300:9800:CBA:6744:59C2:9090 (talk) 21:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahfiruz Hatice Sultan
Talk:Suleiman II of the Ottoman Empire

message: ==picture==
the picture is of suleiman the magnificent, not suleiman ii
==Ahmed Faizil Köprülü==
This article states that Suleiman died after Köprülü, but the article for Ahmed II says otherwise. I suspect this is the incorrect one, since the date of the Battle of Slankamen is also incorrect here. Someone with better knowledge on the matter should correct it. Thanks. --RR' (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Köprülü Ahmet (grandvizier 1661-1676) and  Köprülü Mustafa (grandvizier 1689-1691) were two different people (of the same family) In the article, the names had been merged . But the target of the link was OK. I cleared out the merge . The name is Mustafa and not Ahmet Fazil. Now it is also OK. (I am afraid I can't say the same for the image) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This article states that Suleiman died after Köprülü, but the article for Ahmed II says otherwise. I suspect this is the incorrect one, since the date of the Battle of Slankamen is also incorrect here. Someone with better knowledge on the matter should correct it. Thanks. --RR' (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Köprülü Ahmet (grandvizier 1661-1676) and  Köprülü Mustafa (grandvizier 1689-1691) were two different people (of the same family) In the article, the names had been merged . But the target of the link was OK. I cleared out the merge . The name is Mustafa and not Ahmet Fazil. Now it is also OK. (I am afraid I can't say the same for the image) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ahmed Faizil Köprülü
Talk:Your mom's face

message: Jimmy: What are you doing FATHeR?
FAtHEr: yOuR MoThEr
Jimmy: *sobs*
FAtHEr: (In a mean tone) WhAt’S WroNG JiMMy?
Jimmy: FaThER You’re- you’re Fo...Foaming from the mouth!
FAtHEr:(Looking at young Jimmy with psychotic eyes) aM I?
This is the best talk page on Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B108:955A:46ED:2E8B:D661:9C69 (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Voice of Iraq

message: From the link to Uday Hussein I'm guessing that this has been the name of several radio stations. The BBC says private, Baghdad based. DX info says religious - if this is the case then we need to know which lot. 
Clandestine Radio lists 2 inactive stations with that name - Egypt funded 1958/9, US(?) funded 1958. Radio Netherlands says this one launched in summer 2003. The references in that to broadcasts about Husayn bin Ali may indicate that the station is shia. Secretlondon 20:19, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mahmud I

message: Brand new EI3 article of Mahmud I if someone is interested in expanding this article . HistoryofIran (talk) 23:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New EI3 article
Talk:American's Creed

message: - How did it become popular after the US Civil War if it was not written until 1917? Is that a typo? Should is read that it became popular after WWI.
:*American Nationalism is referred to as becoming popular after the Civil War, not the creed.--PvtDeth 19:09, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: How

message: The American's Creed doesn't seem to have been actually adopted as any sort of official creed. The account of the contest and the award given to its author were written into the Congressional Record after the fact, but that doesn't seem to give it any sort of official status. Lots of stuff makes it into the Congressional Record without assuming an official character. Benami 11:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Official? Really?

message: Article one of the constitution describes how "official" laws of the U.S. are made, requiring passing both houses and then signed by the President.  The House frequently passes resolutions, such as naming days or weeks after individual or causes that are never signed into law. This deserves to be on Wikipedia but not to imply that this is "the" creed of this country.  That is represented in our Constitution and the total sum history of this nationArodb (talk) 02:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Concur with not being official

message: The 'American creed' is a general statement of what ideals define America and make it unique. It's frequently referenced in political commentary, with Jefferson often cited as the originator. Therefore I propose to change this page's title to the 'American Creed', add in all this information I mentioned, and relegate the current content related to a subsection. Mabandalone (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be expanded to refer to the 'American Creed' in general 
Talk:Osman III

message: ==more info==
I think we can find more academic information about Osman III instead of arguing his interesting relation with women. With respect, Deliogul 21:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am waiting for a reply for my note written a year ago. The editor has been blocked and I got no reply. After checking the articles Şehsuvar Sultan and  List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire I am sure that the nane of the mother is Şehsuvar Sultan and I am going to edit the name. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I think we can find more academic information about Osman III instead of arguing his interesting relation with women. With respect, Deliogul 21:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: more info

message: In the introductory paragraph the name of his mother is given as Saliha Sabkatı and in just a sentence later the name switches to Şehsuvar Sultan. Acoording to the list of Ottoman Sultans the correct name seems to be the second. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am waiting for a reply for my note written a year ago. The editor has been blocked and I got no reply. After checking the articles Şehsuvar Sultan and  List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire I am sure that the nane of the mother is Şehsuvar Sultan and I am going to edit the name. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother
Talk:Mustafa III

message: ==kids these days==
Could someone find the real (and not anecdotical!) number of this Sultan's children? 582 male-only children is somewhat exaggerating...
--Kensai 14:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence to support anything but two sons and five daughters. I've removed the obvious hoax. —Cuiviénen 20:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Could someone find the real (and not anecdotical!) number of this Sultan's children? 582 male-only children is somewhat exaggerating...
--Kensai 14:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence to support anything but two sons and five daughters. I've removed the obvious hoax. —Cuiviénen 20:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: kids these days

message: Mustafa III was NEVER FORCED to declare the war, he just did what the French ambassador told him to do. François de Tott, (from WIKIPEDIA) he was appointed consul in Crimea in order to investigate about the country and to provoke the Crimean Tatars against the Imperial Russia.
Catherine II at this period had a poor country and absolutelly disorganized army. Russia did not want any war at this time.
Mustafa III served the French interests in this war.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.226.233.172 (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHO STARTED THE WAR? 

message: I removed a section in the article which reads (as of today): In a series of correspondence between prominent French thinker Voltaire and Catherine the Great, Mustafa III was consistently ridiculed, with Voltaire referring to him as "fat and ignorant.".  I removed this section because the background and context of the correspondance are not explained.  Without such context, this statement is extremely prone to misunderstanding. Catherine the Great and Voltaire were very good friends.  Catherine's lifetime objective was to conquer Constantinople and destroy the Ottoman Empire.  Voltaire considered Catherine as an enlightened monarch and supported her in every way.  This correspondance is simply a letter between good friends where one friend is giving emotional support to another.  It is not a realistic portrayal of Mustafa III.  I am almost sure that Voltaire had never seen a portrait of Mustafa III. He could not have known firsthand how fat Mustafa III is.  By the way, Catherine the Great herself was pleasantly plump herself.  I seriously don't think this kind of foolish gossip between two frieds has any place in this article. Voltaire is not talking as a great thinker in that letter, instead he is talking as if he is Catherine's BFF.---Vikiyazar (talk) 13:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correspondance between Voltaire and Catherine II removed
Talk:Selim III

message: Under the "Biography and Family" section the second paragraph begins "Sultan Mustafa was very influenced by Motu and Patlu." Who or what might this Motu and Patlu be and of what relevance?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerryqays (talk • contribs) 10:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: Selim III. composed Suzidilara maevlevi ayin, however he was neither one of the mevlevi dervishes nor a Dede in mevlevi order. He only attended the speechs of Seyh Galip and felt affection to mevlevi order. However, I say again, he was not a mevlevi dervish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.1.201 (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selim III. was in mevlevi order??? 

message: The two "versions" of the murder given in the article appear to be exactly the same, save that the second one is more detailed.  They also refer to the same general by two different names for no apparent reason.  Needs to be fixed. john k (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  two versions of the murder? 

message: This is blatantly wrong. He was murdered on the orders of Mustafa IV. Also he was murdered by  palace officials (M. Şükrü Hanioğlu - A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire p 54-56)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.71.129.249 (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder by "assassins" 

message: I added some badly needed paragraph breaks and repaired some aborted sentences, such as changing
:"Although distressed by the establishment of the republic in France. Ottoman government was soothed by French representatives in Constantinople who maintained the goodwill of various influential personages, including the later [...?]"
to
:"Although distressed by the establishment of the republic in France, Ottoman government was soothed by French representatives in Constantinople who maintained the goodwill of various influential personages."
I also added a definition and link for "the Porte" which was mysterious within the article and identified and linked Horace Sébastiani in place of the single reference "Sebastiani" The article is pretty good but could use some restructuring, as sections like "Janissary revolt" are included under "Foreign Relations" and "Downfall and assassination" should probably be placed after "Franco-Turkish relationships", and so forth, by a more knowledgable editor.  Rt3368 (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some repairs
Talk:Mustafa IV

message: Mustafa VI had only one child, a daughter , named emine, died with 6 months, she is buried in the Tomb of Mustafa VI.
Mustafa VI had no son, there is no sehzade ahmed , son of VI Mustafa listed in the Ottoman Archiv.
Also no any Nuhkhetseza raised a sehzade ahmed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.112.141 (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only one child 

message: Seniyeperver was his Mother, because, if any Mother of a Sehzade was still alive she became the next Valide Sultan, no matter if there was the first or last kadinefendi.
Nükethseza was not his Mother...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.248.178.62 (talk) 12:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother
Talk:Murad V

message: Did this man do anything other than get married? Safebreaker (talk) 08:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

message: ISTANBUL, the city is called ISTANBUL.
@ Safebreaker
Yes, he composed some classical western music.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.35.67.198 (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am finding no significant content in reliable sources to support a stand alone article for Fehime Sultan. I suggest a merge of the content to this article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: WITHDRAWING MERGE REQUEST: someone provided a source that looks like it has quite a bit of content and so with the other passing bits I have seen, it appears we can do a suitable stand alone article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WITHDRAWN 
Merge [[Fehime Sultan]] to here
 
Talk:Al-Nahdiah

message: Why is this woman classified as a non-Arab? Her father was from Thaqif, the Arab tribe dominant in Ta'if. I haven't been able to find out who the Nahd were, but I'm guessing they were a clan of Thaqif. Her mother was a Quraysh. That would make her both biologically and legally an Arab, unless anyone has evidence to the contrary.Petra MacDonald (talk) 03:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnicity
Talk:Dolton, Illinois

message: Maybe someone could add the history to this stub-article. Some information are given on the homepage of Dolton, but I guess more information is needed. --Sebbe xy (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:National Anthem of Kuwait

message: This page seems to have some problems, the first paragraph is a mix of Arabic transliteration, numbers, and English. Rmpfu89 20:52, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
::Yeah, I fixed that now... And someone mught want to put up the Arabic version.Rmpfu89 22:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found an English Transliteration from nationalanthems.us Inkan1969 09:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the remark on a genre of "nasheed". The expression "nasheed al watani" means just "national anthem". --Kipala 23:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Translating Arabic poems makes it lose the power, it sounds stupid in English radiant guy 10:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't even make sense in English. "Warded by true sentry giving their soils aptly"?! Equinox ◑ 14:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 
Talk:Al-Nayrizi

message: It is so because although the person is recognized in the west by the Arabic name, he was not an Arab. Westerners tend to lump all middle easterners together in one group, which is incorrect. Nayrizi was Persian, hence the name al-Nayrizi is incorrect even though prevalent, perhaps even in his own time, as Arabic was the lingua franca of scientists.--Zereshk 21:46, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I formatted the Arabic script in the intro. His name is written in Arabic so I made it an Arabic link. If it were written in Persian someone could use   instead of   Cuñado  - Talk 02:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: good deal.--Zereshk 02:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic
Talk:Al-Nasir Muhammad

message: How could he be a ruler two years before his own birth? --149.229.97.244 12:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Feel free to add this coin to the article. PHG (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 21:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Coinage

message: Brass tray stand, Egypt or Syria, in the name of Muhammad ibn Qalaun, 1330-40.British Museum Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 20:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 21:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Brass tray
Talk:Al Qadarif State

message: The current flag associated with al-Qadarif is below any reasonable quality standard. The arabic text along the bottom is reversed, and the image of the seal is of poor quality. Given the absence of alternatives, I'm removing it from the page for now, though I'll take a crack at it later.  Jippijip (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flawed flag
Talk:Al-Qadr (surah)

message: القدر 
leans more towards Power than fate, I would appreciate is someone looked into the Tafsir, I'm doing the arabic words for now--The Brain 00:17, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We're doing this at school and we found out it could also be spelt Al-Qadar (our stundent teacher told us) She said it was the Muslim belief that Allah knows our destiny and we can do nothing about it, but we can still have free will —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.210.164.28 (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al-Qadr
Talk:Al-Qa'im (town)

message: The town is exactly on the boarder with Syria, which is much closer than the image makes the town appear. (Atfyfe 23:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. If you look at e.g. http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iraq_pol_2004.jpg , you'll see that the town is actually a little distance from the border - I'd estimate 20-25 km or so. -- ChrisO 23:54, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, you are correct. According to a couple of sites: Qusaybah, Qaim and Sada are all three seperate cities but seemlessly run into one another. Qusaybah is right on the boarder, Qaim is just to the east of Qusaybah, and Sada is just to the west of Qaim. I had the order mixed up in my head. Here is a good pic showing how interconnected the cities are, and how close to the boarder they are: http://billroggio.com/images/maps/Qaim_Husaybah.php (Atfyfe 00:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I recall, "Al-Qa'im" refers to the entire metropolitan area (so to speak) that is made up of all the towns from the Syrian border east to Ubaydi.  From west to east: Husaybah, Karabilah, and Sa'dah.  Husaybah is located at the intersection of the border and the Euphrates River, with the other towns extending down the river to the east along Highway 12. 63.160.173.6 18:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds more correct 63.160.173.6, thanks for clearing the issue up. I knew something was wrong with the entry but I guess I couldn't quite recall how the cities were arranged. I only ran around Qaim for a 2-week operation. --Atfyfe () 04:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Qumri

message: It is so because although the person is recognized in the west by the Arabic name, he was not an Arab. Westerners tend to lump all middle easterners together in one group, which is incorrect. Qomri was Persian, hence the name al-Qumri is incorrect even though prevalent, perhaps even in his own time, as Arabic was the lingua franca used by all Persian scientists.--Zereshk 21:49, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled