lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coalition for Patent Fairness

message: I am in the process of substantially modifying this page.  Please give it a day or two and then judge.--Nowa (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on your creation of the page, it appears your ultimate goal is to disparage the Coalition for Patent Fairness. While I agree to some extent (personally) with the views you expressed, Wikipedia is not the place to express them. The article must be written in a completely neutral manner to merely identify the subject matter and discuss their notablility. If that's not your intent, and you instead want to use the article as a way show people that the CPF are a bunch of buffoons...you're probably better off just letting the article be deleted. Gromlakh (talk) 21:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you saying that Wikipedia should not have an article on CPF?--Nowa (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm not saying that at all. In its current (revised) form, I'm not sure there's enough there for it to really be kept. Speedy deletion was declined because it's no longer an attack page, but that doesn't mean it would necessarily pass an AfD at this point (even though the group probably is notable enough to merit an entry if done properly). It would have to be expanded. My point was simply that you need to ask yourself if you're really the person to do that. If you can expand the page with pertinent information in a neutral, non-attacking manner, then that would be excellent. If your feelings are too strong on the issue and you will not be able to approach it neutrally for inclusion, then you're not the person who should be working on this article. Gromlakh (talk) 22:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is anything about CPF that you feel should be included, I welcome your additions.--Nowa (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

text: No, you moved it to the talk page, which isn't any better and is still defamatory. I've removed it for that reason. Gromlakh (talk) 21:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.--Nowa (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion
Talk:Herschel, Saskatchewan

message: (Cocopie (talk) 21:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pedricktown, New Jersey

message: This article says that the town was named after Howard Ashley Pedrick (1863–1941), who built a railway line in Suriname. If so, you will find his biography in:
* Howard Ashley Pedrick (1863-1941), edited by Will deGrochy and William L. Magee: Jungle Gold: Dad Pedrick's Story. Indianapolis, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1930.
*Howard Ashley Pedrick (1863-1941), herausgegeben von Will deGrochy and William L. Magee: Sketch of the railway [https://www.amazon.com/Jungle-gold-Dad-Pedricks-story/dp/B00085SSE2 Jungle Gold: Dad Pedrick's Story. Indianapolis, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1930.</ref><ref>Pakira Kreek auf Mapcarta.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: More likely  "Pedricktown was named after Roger Pedrick, who bought a large tract of land here from John Fenwick in 1674, before he arrived in New Jersey."--NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Canadian Military Engineers

message: can i study Military Engineering in canda ? Tameem d Al gaood (talk) 03:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  dear university
Talk:Napery

message: I will assume this nomination is made in good faith, but you might suspect that the nominator has not read the whole article, because the nomination is completely without merit. While the first line deals with the word in its dictionary sense - the sense that is defined on Wiktionary - the rest of the article explains the term in its historic sense. That means an exploration of how the office fits into the wider context of the medieval household, supported by reliable, external sources. This is encyclopaedic knowledge, and in no way the stuff of dictionaries. I see no reason to act on this nomination, and will await a second opinion. I will therefore remove the template. Lampman (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion nomination
Talk:John Griffith (engineer)

message: One of Sir John's children has been left out of the Wikipedia entry. His third child Frederick Griffith. Please add this to John William and Alice.
Thankyou:
Kieran Griffith  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.226.203 (talk) 17:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Child Forgotten 
Talk:Masasi District, Mtwara

message: The statement ' The district lies between 100 and 200 degree south of the equator and 360 and 380 degrees East of Greenwich.' needs correcting (possibly the degree sign has converted to a zero) - and does the district have 23 or 28 wards? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections needed
Talk:John Waters (disambiguation)

message: As the film has not even been reported to start filming, we should merge this until there's a release date so we can keep the history, categories and discussion and if the film is released it can get its own entry back. JASpencer (talk) 21:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Per the notability guidelines for future films, a stand-alone article isn't warranted until shooting begins, which is not at all a certainty.  Considering that the IMDb page is only available on IMDb Pro, as is usually the case for projects not in active development, it's unlikely that shooting will begin this month. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Fruitcake (film)]] 

message: John Waters (b. 1946) is clearly the primary topic for this name, as the following 90d page view stats show:
#55768    John Waters (director born 1946)
#8138    John Waters (actor) (born 1948)
#4392    John K. Waters (1906–1989), American general
#4108    John Waters (columnist) (born 1955), Irish journalist
#1303    John Waters (director born 1893) 
#538    Sir John Waters (British Army officer) (born 1935), British Army general
#174    John Waters (politician) (before 1840–after 1894), Canadian Liberal legislator
The 1946 John Waters has received 3x the page views of all of the others combined in the past 90 days.  That's clear enough indication to me that he's the primary topic, and I'm moving the pages accordingly. —Darkwind (talk) 06:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic
Talk:National Association of Japan–America Societies

message: Good god! I just created this page two minutes ago! This is not spam, this is the largest bilateral Japan-United States relations grassroots organization in the US, and needed to be written. Someone has too itchy a trigger finger. Chris (クリス) (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: hangon tagging

message: I would suggest that information about NAJAS programming be added -- for example, the KKC Fellowship program. Specific mentions of partnerships between NAJAS and organizations such as the US-Japan council would also contribute to a greater sense of clarity about how the Association goes about its business in assisting the Japan-America Society network spread Japanese culture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsoruss (talk • contribs) 20:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of specific NAJAS initiatives
Talk:Kagera Region

message: Removing that stuff about Massawe day, it reads like a propaganda leaflet or a reelection campaign. 159.230.140.83 (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Massawe Day

message: "long before the White man came" seems quite silly, what did the author mean? Should be reworded "before colonial influence in the area" or something of that ilk or removed completely. Also, citation bloody needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:9197:48F6:C06E:B0B6:3D7B:5F94 (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 

message: In the History section, this ref is listed:Seth, Niyikiza [The new Haya Transformation, The legacy of Babumbilo (2014)] Does anyone have a link or access to that source? Is it a published paper/book? A film? - Procyonidae (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finding a reference
Talk:Arusha Region

message: As some editors like to list and some readers like to read about who is famous from a place, it seems appropriate to have a section for them. However, keeping in mind the guidelines for lists, please only list people who have a Wikipedia article about them. If the person's article does not have material that shows their connection to Arusha Region, please provide citation to reliable sources for that connection. Thanks. Material that does not meet the requirements of the guidelines is subject to deletion. See, in particular, :Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Lists of people. --Bejnar (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular people

message: The article contradicts itself. On the first paragraph is says it has the highest HDI in Tanzania as 0.721 and in the main box it says low 0.545 Nlivataye (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  HDI
Talk:The Brothers Flub

message: Yay, my first article that has nothing to do with music or malls. I really think that this cartoon was highly under-rated, and it deserves an actual page of verifiable content. This page isn't much yet -- a Flub stub, if you will -- but at least it's something. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Well, here we are...

message: I know this show is not officially a Nicktoon, but I'm curious to know why. Anybody know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fez2005 (talk • contribs) 08:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Nicktoon, why? 
Talk:Matthew J. Murray

message: Thanks everyone for your work to finally keep this to the facts and provide good sourcing. I notice an addition to the Letter to God section. The observations about the letter in the last sentence seem to be original research, and I read it as implying that KMGH did not know firsthand that they were indeed expletives before censorship occurred. Neither source makes this observation. I could also surmise from the letter that the censored words read "stupid cunt" "fucking cunt" and "stupid cunt", but to say so in namespace would also be original research. Rather than arguing over what the letter actually says or drawing our own conclusions or making our own observations in namespace, shouldn't we just stick to what the journalists have noted?
I know it may be difficult to trust those sources, especially after the "Hate mail" retraction, but eventually I think the process works itself out and we should just stick to what these sources claim to know, while attributing clearly so the reader can decide if these source are reliable. ClaudeReigns (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The intended implication is simply what KMGH reported:  That the letter was "laden with expletives".  Were these four words expletives?  Probably, but we can't say for certain as the source did not say.  However, KMGH does present a letter, with four words blacked out.  That much is sourced, and I provided that source for readers to view.  There is, after all, a difference between an observation and a conclusion:  Every claim in namespace is an observation, whether based on cited sources or not. -- JeffBillman (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Letter to God and original research

message: I propose this article be merged to 2007 Colorado YWAM and New Life shootings, as this article deals almost exclusively with that event. -- JeffBillman (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The shooting and the person who committed it are separate subjects and must be handled in separate articles. As there appears to be no further support for the merger, I am removing the merger proposal template. Dgf32 (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't appear to be any support for much of anything concerning this article. *shrugs* It's just as well.  In another five years, both articles will probably make it to AfD for insufficient notability.  Until then, two articles on the matter aren't going to kill us. -- JeffBillman (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this should be merged. The shooter does not have notability independent from the event. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Millot

message: This article seems to be written by the point of view of someone who works for the company or is directly involved somehow. Dustihowe  Talk  22:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 
Talk:Jensen-Healey

message: Hi,
The main picture on the Jensen Healey page shows a car with non standard wheels - could it be changed for a more representative picture?
Thanks
Dave  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.73.192 (talk) 22:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, you're right. I took a look at Commons and the two following seem the best candidates. Both could use some editing though, tomorrow I'll see what I can do. —Cloverleaf II (talk) 22:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jensen Healey picture 

message: According to a number of car classic magazines (like AutoBILD classic for example), the main reason for the demise of the J-H and Jensen as whole was the Lotus engine which tended to fail quite often causing Jensen to come up for fixing/replacrment of the units. Already being plagued by insufficient funds, Jensen eventually went into folding the business - while Lotus was able to sort out the problems with the 907, greatly improving the reliability.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:560:424D:BE00:1C80:446F:7F33:A1FC (talk) 19:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real reason for the failure of the J-H?
Talk:Derby County F.C.–Nottingham Forest F.C. rivalry

message: The name East Midlands derby is closely associated to Nottingham Forest vs Derby County matches. But an article on LCFC.com also refers to Leicester vs Nottm Forest matches with the same name (last sentence, first paragraph). How should the wiki articles be seperated should an article be created for Leicester vs Forest? Wolcott (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you would have to use a section of the article to state that the term can also be applied to other combinations of teams in the area, although Derby v Forest is clearly the primary rivalry. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Is it a good idea to combine this page with Derby County F.C. - Leicester City F.C. rivalry and :eicester City F.C. - Nottingham Forest F.C. rivalry. They're all East Midlands rivalries and could be segregated in to individual fixtures?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.218.234 (talk) 23:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combining article 

message: Leicester-Derby and Leicester-Forest are nearly always referred to as East Midlands derbies too. This article title is inaccurate and should be merged just like The Devon derby with Exeter, Plymouth AND Torquay.
Also many fans view Leicester as equally big games... Just look on Twitter.
Definitely merge!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.160.169 (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: The rivalries are all linked and just taking up space. 
So much detail isn't needed for Derby-Forest.
Derby-Forest is NOT THE East Midlands Derby, it is AN East Midlands derby just like Derby-Leicester and Leicester-Forest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.229.134 (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have honestly no opinion on this. I don't think there's any serious discussion here, because most of the comments agreeing on the merge from the past year are IPs, and coincidentally none of them signed their comments. For all we know it was all from the same person. Wolcott (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article 
Talk:Jensen 541

message: The fabulous, sleek and luxurious Jensen 541S GT sports car was 4 inches wider than the earlier 541 models, providing a far more spacious, luxurious interior and better road holding.
The new look was stunning and the manual drive version (only 22 out of 127 were manual drive) they had the same 4 litre straight six modified Austin engine, with three SU carburetors, the Salisbury gearbox, and the Lacock-de-Normanville overdrive.   It was also the first car with seat belts and Dunlop disc brakes all round. 
The 541S has certain other good design features; adjustable front seat arm rests fitted to each door, the Bevelift jack, kept in the boot, was designed for use through the floor of the car in front of each front seat.  So it was possible to lift front and rear wheels together whilst protected from the rain.  When the boot lid is open the driver can still see, without any restriction, out of the rear window.  Very sensibly the spare wheel valve is accessible, through a fitting in the rear of the boot floor, thus allowing the air pressure to be checked easily without having to remove the wheel.
Unfortunately it had bad press revues, as all the road tests were with the automatic version, and the Rolls Royce auto gearbox lost a lot of power, but the manual drive was a high performance GT sports car. John Neville Cohen (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Very Rare Jensen 541S Manual Drive with Overdrive
Talk:Canadian Radio Broadcasting Commission

message: Frequencies of CRBC stations probably need further review.  I corrected the frequencies of CRCS, CRCK, and CRCM.  (1580 was not a valid broadcasting frequency during the CRBC's existence)  I am not convinced CRCY existed (but can't prove it right now) and I believe there were additional frequency changes during the CRBC's lifespan.
Source: RADEX #99 (May 1936) for the CRCS/CRCK/CRCM changes.  Other RADEX and White's Radio Log magazines should be useful for further review.
W9wi (talk) 12:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Composition of the Austrian provincial parliaments

message: Is a member of a Landtag officially referred to as a MP in English? samwaltz (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: nomenclature
Talk:Celulosa Arauco y Constitución

message: Rodrigo Cisternas
In April 2007 there was a strike at the Celulosa Arauco's location in Arauco, Bio bio. The srtike culminated in the death of a worker, Rodrigo Cisternas at the hands of the police who had been called in by the company to clear the road. Would this make an appropriate addition to the article?.
:Yes, if the background is well explained and some source is given. Dentren | Talk 14:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Spot

message: "Spot" also refers to Scott Draves.  This meaning is the #6 google hit, but I have CoI since that's me.  It was removed from this list by Editor5435 in a vendetta against me as a result of our dispute over Fractal Compression.
Spot (talk) 17:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your nickname "Spot" is no reason to be included in the list, its nothing but shameless self promotion and vanity serving your own interest, just as "you" are the one advocating your own insignificant listing.--Editor5435 (talk) 19:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scott Draves

message: Scott Draves isn't notable enough to include here.  While there might be a handful of people with this nickname, this seems highly unusual and not worth mentioning any more than my high school nickname of Skittles is.  [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 05:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Spot" is the name I use professionally, just like Spot_(producer) Spot_(rapper/producer) and much more so than Jerry_Chamberlain who just used it once, but is still listed.  See Spotworks DVD,  "software artist Spot aka Scott Draves", an interview ("all of spot's art"), on a playbill ("Visuals by SPOT"). Spot (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So is anyone going to argue that it's not a professional nickname? --Ronz (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

text: There goes Scott Draves again, tooting his own horn.  I have never seen such obsessive blatant self promotion and vanity demonstrated on Wikipedia before! Both Scott Draves and his nickname (personal or so called professional) are "IRRELEVANT" to the scope of this article.--Editor5435 (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please follow WP:TALK and WP:CON or your comments may be ignored. --Ronz (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? I am not the only one against this preposterous inclusion to the article, in case you haven't noticed. Besides, Scott Draves should not be commenting on his own inclusion, it is a blatant NPOV and COI violation of Wikipedia policy.  You should know better than that.--Editor5435 (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you read WP:TALK, WP:CON, WP:NPOV, and WP:COI.  I don't see Draves violating any of them, but you certainly are. --Ronz (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yah right, someone engaged in their own blatant self promotion isn't NPOV and COI? You only make yourself appear foolish by saying such nonsense! Your credibility is lacking.--Editor5435 (talk) 19:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of being uncivil, take your complaints of COI to WP:COIN. --Ronz (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion
Talk:Rosanna Carter

message: She is a minor actress, but does have a presence in filmographies, reference works, etc.  I've added 4 independent sources testifying to her minor, yet definite role in the world of American dramatic performance. NuclearWinner (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - her Emmy nomination alone makes her notable. Thanks for improving the article. WWGB (talk) 22:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And thank YOU for your gracious assistance with the formatting. NuclearWinner (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why she is notable
Talk:Garbhagriha

message: If Hinduism is only in India and structures pertaining to Hinduism are only in India, then rightly this article belongs to India. However, if architectural structures related to Hinduism are found in other countries and cultures, then restricting it to India means that another article must be created for those architectural structures using the term that are not related to India. Mattisse 15:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hinduism exists in other countries notably Nepal and Bali. So removed Indiaa tag as suggested.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Hindu architecture only in India?
Talk:New York State Route 323

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
Talk:Mercedes-Benz SSK

message: Stuart Woods's The Prince of Beverly Hills begins with the cdrash of one fo these cars.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.225.37.47 (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In pop culture 

message: In the above-named manga, it is apparently a running joke that the eponymous character's SSK gets wrecked on a semi-regular basis.
Is this sufficiently interesting to be included in this article?
TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 20:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Lupin the Third]]