lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orange Coast

message: Several of the cities listed (Costa Mesa, Irvine, Laguna Niguel, Aliso Viejo, San Juan Capistrano) do not touch the beach.  You have to go through another city to reach the ocean, so it seems like technically they are not on the coast.  Where did this list come from? Alanraywiki 21:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever made up this fake list forgot Seal Beach. Is that not part of the "Orange Coast" in their mind?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.192.132 (talk) 01:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coastal cities?

message: I have never heard of this area being called the Gold Coast? Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa are the farthest from the "Gold Coast" I have ever seen. This article should be deleted. 75.43.199.19 (talk) 06:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think the article should either be deleted or add some references and merge it in with the Orange County article as a sentence or two. Alanraywiki (talk) 06:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gold Coast?

message: Orange Coast College was the first utterance of the phrase "Orange Coast," and as it is located within Costa Mesa, I feel that, in the event this article is not to be deleted, then it should be included.  See the bitch fit recently raised by the Daily Pilot.
http://dailypilot.com/articles/2010/01/13/blogs_and_columns/mesa_musings/dpt-mesamusings011310.txt
Jackbewiki (talk) 04:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: OCC
Talk:Smoking in Jewish law

message: I'm concerned about the following:
1.) How much of the text of this article was copied, verbatim, from this one:  
2.) The legitimacy of using the above article as a source (I think not)
3.) The formatting problems that arose from the cutting and the pasting that the perp felt it unnecessary to fix (i.e., the character "?" showing up, here, instead of a character in whatever font was used for the original article)
4.) The "sources" and "references," all naked-like, at the end of just about every paragraph, instead of formatted properly using ref. tags (which happened as a result of #1, above)
5.) The "sources" and "references" being, in many cases, illegible, and are therefore, as my friend Hong used to say, "No good."
I've done some copyediting, as you can see in the history, but I've left things formatted as quotes alone for now, because I don't have time at the moment to fact/quote check.  But when I do, and if it looks like a quote comes from the article I linked to, above, I'm leaning strongly toward pulling it -- because of plagiarism and/or because I challenge the legitimacy of the "source."  
And finally, please don't forget that this article isn't just for Jewish people, or people who already know about Judaism.  Please make sure to italicize words that are not English (and aren't in common use), and write out things like "Rabbi" (instead of "R.").  
That's all for now -- but I'll be back.  
קְחוּ עִמָּכֶם דְּבָרִים וְשׁוּבוּ אֶל־יְהוָה אִמְרוּ אֵלָיו כָּל־תִּשָּׂא עָוֹן וְקַח־טֹוב וּנְשַׁלְּמָה פָרִים שְׂפָתֵינוּ׃
Sugarbat (talk) 01:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs major work
Talk:Name resolution

message: I would like to see a section on 'use context' which is the semantic domain defined by the
algorthyms mentioned in the text of the article.
For example, in the introduction the phrase 'used in a certain context' infers ANY context.
It is thus inclusive of valid and invalid 'use'. The use context is the valid
semantic domain of use.
For example C# interfaces ARE NOT THE SAME as C++ abstract methods because
the 'use context' is different (see article on Virtual Inheritance).
Also the difference in inheritance scope (of the lines of inheritance) in C#
(single implementation inheritance) and C++ (mulitple implementation inheritance)
is another example of a 'scope level' that has major impact on the use context
of classes.
A brief enumeration of the language independent 'scope levels' such as static/vs/dynamic,
language binding, accessibility, visibility
and MII/vs/SII would be most helpful to articulate what a 'use context' is.
A taxononmy (as opposed to a parital and simple categorical list) would be
cover a lot of ground.
In summary a 'use context' is the semantic domain defined in a language
as specified by the language mechanisms that define the valid 'use context' of a code element.
Shawnktalk—-Shawn wiki 17:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use Context should be formally defined

message: Do we have to use Usama bin Laden as an example? I think this is quite unappropriate. Maybe just use "John Smith", or if it has to be a well known name "Michael Jackson" (of which certainly multiple exist).
Blonkm 12:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usama? 

message: This appears to three three topics with nothing holding it together. A lead would definitely help but should we turn this article in to a disambiguation page and split the topics out into separate articles? --Kvng (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a lede and worked on the "In computer systems" section, but it is actually more than one topic all by itself (check out Name Service Switch). So I'm thinking a disambiguation page is the way to go. Joeldbenson (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 topics
Talk:Qom province

message: "History" in this article might be copy vio from .
*History content was added at version March 2005 (diff)
*Website above exists in Internet Archive of November 2004 
This content is not much the same word-by-word, but is almost the same. Especially, using Islamic Calender, and Hazrat Ma'soomeh "(AS)" is characteristic. -Kotoito 15:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gosstandart

message: Is "metrology" a misspelling of "meterology" or is it intended to mean something else?
:The science that deals with measurement., I'll make that more clear - FrancisTyers 18:32, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Metrology?

message: Merging GOST with Gosstandart seems like a good idea for now. Might be an idea to have a List of GOST standards or something too. If no-one disagrees in a couple of days I'll go through with it and redirect GOST -> Gosstandart. - FrancisTyers 20:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Amal (militia)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Amal (militia) → Amal Party (Lebanon). The redirect was the original name of the article, but it has been moved because the term "militia" proved to be greatly POV. 500LL 19:11, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
** Amal was described as a militia in the West for many years, (and it basically was one, in the beginning, during the Lebanese civil war), so I think we should keep this as an aid to searching. Noel (talk) 21:14, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nyak Tso

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it, merge it with another article, and/or redirect it to another article. The deletion debate is archived here. – ugen64 19:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: This page was originally at "Nyak Tso" and was moved here as a result of VfD discussion. The page of "Nyak Tso" immediately after the page move consisted of:
(cur) (last) 1490407214904072 19:26, 6 Jun 2005 Ugen64 ("Nyak Tso" moved to Nyak Tso)
— A.M. 00:36, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Perinthalmanna

message: User:Jishacj requested me to see the history portion. I will do that soon, but I am giving a link, may be it is useful (http://www.varma.net/articles/valluvan1.php).--Bhadani 18:47, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I am puzzled by certain statments in the article. For instance:
#The ruler of Valluvanad was a witness during the offering of the title deed by king Veeraraghava in 1320. What exactly is the meaning of this sentence? Who was the ruler of Valluvanad which this sentence refers to? And, who is this king Veeraraghava?
#After the death of Cheraman Perumal(1320-1342) kerala was divided among the rulers of Thiruvithamkoor, Kochi, Kolothunaadu, Kurumbanadu and Valluvanad states. This sentence gives a wrong impression that until the death of Cheraman Perumal, there was a state/kingdom with the same geographical boundaries as Kerala has today.  This is not correct.The state of Kerala was formed only on November 1, 1956, based on the recommendations of the State Reorganisation Commission set up by the Government of India. (See Kerala)
#It is said that currency notes were lying scattered on the roads. Were currency notes actually in use in the province as a medium of exchange during that period?
I don't know anything about Perinthalmanna to make the required changes. Will the User:Jishacj have a look at this and make the necessary corrections? MANOJTV 10:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking clarification

message: *hello, User:Jishacj and all fellow wikipedians, I am trying to reorganise texts / reword / clarify certain points. It shall be completed over next one week. I would encourage everyone interested in the article to edit / contribute. At least, certain sugge shall be most welcome. And, feel free to change / re-edit to improve. Thanks.--Bhadani 16:23, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganising

message: Is it just me or is the topic title completely incorrect. Since it apparently is, shouldn't we be redirecting it to the actual spelling?Chrisvanlang (talk) 11:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spellingof Perinthalmanna

message: The photo shown here is in no way related to perinthalmanna. Alanallur is a village almost 25 km away from perinthalmanna.its better to replace it. HishamTotungal (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo given
Talk:Chemical reactor

message: The article says it stands for "continuously-stirred tank reactor".  I have seen this definition in several places, including text books, but I think it is incorrect.  I think, rather, it should be, and originally was, "continuous stirred-tank reactor".  It is continuous because it has both continuous input and output streams, as opposed to a batch stirred-tank reactor, which has no continuous output stream.  "Continuously-stirred" seems superflous, as I've never heard of an intermittently-stirred reactor.  But as I said, I've seen the "continuously" form in several other sources.  Does anyone object to adding both meanings to the article?
:I agree with the "continuous stirred-tank reactor" description as the continuous modifier means that the process is continuous as apposed to batch.  I have never heard of a intermittently-stirred reactor; this would put holes in the assumption of prefect mixing and the derived mathematical models would no longer hold.  I DO OBJECT to having both descriptions as one is misleading, even though it is in some published academic literature. — BeastRHIT B.S. Chemcial Engineering 2004
:I also agree. As a Spanish-speaking chemical engineer with a PhD from an English-speaking university, I really never paid attention to this difference, but I realize "continuous" should be the correct term. --Doctor C 01:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CSTR meaning

message: Why is it that the Natural Resource Management concept of residence time, which conceptualises the idea of rate relative to reservoirs, is redirected to this page?
GreatMizuti 17:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone is free to create a disambiguation page for NRM and chemical engineering definitions. --Vuo 12:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

text: There is no difference between usage of the term among different fields, just differences in how the quantity is estimated/measured, which are of course particular to the process in question. Residence time is no longer a redirect to this page. Daniel Collins 18:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Residence Time
Talk:The Book of Lists

message: The correct title of the series is The Book of Lists, not Book of Lists so I have moved it accordingly. 23skidoo 05:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: I have restored the "WikiAlmanac" thread, above. Talk page discussions may not be deleted unless they are either libellous or seriously off-topic. 23skidoo 13:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of talk page threads not allowed
Talk:Yoruba music

message: It seems possible that the way that the page is written unnecessarily holds non-Islamic influences on Yoruba music in contempt. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Conformancenut347 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic inflammatory? 

message: I would like to remind us that this is a topical issue refering to Yoruba music, if we have any theories let us please back this up with accurate inline citation. The real heroes of this topic seem to be left out in the cold here; the "gbedu"; if we want to start a debate i would be inclined to put music parsé in the thick of it, this is not a battlefield for scoring points on who did what for whoever; rather it is an opportunity for you to put the "real winners" out in the spotlight - Yoruba music.
Otelemuyen (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanatics show restrain
Talk:Cambridge University Cricket Club

message: Cambridge University Cricket Club has not been entirely subsumed within the UCCE team. The Varsity match remains between Oxford and Cambridge University Cricket Clubs proper. The Cambridge UCCE team is dominated by players from Anglia Polytechnic University. The UCCE team has first class status, so its fixtures with county sides contribute to first class statistics, unlike Cardiff UCCE and Bradford and Leeds UCCE.
Does Cambridge still retain its first-class status?? I was led to believe it did not...Will0608 (talk) 21:42, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Staff

message: For some bizarre reason, the 'staves' link in "barrel" directs here...
how are the flat wooden (fencepost-like) pieces related to anything called a staff? I mean there are staves made of wood for walking, but...
: This can be confusing because staves is one of the acceptable plural forms of staff.  However, the word stave (without the 's') is not synomymous with staff, except in the particular sense of refering to a musical staff.  A stave (pl. staves) can also refer to one of the components of a barrel or cask, but it is most certainly never called a staff.  I've tried to make this distinction clearer, as well as adding wiktionary links for both words.--Dmeranda 21:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staves
Talk:Hew-cluster reduction

message: Um.  What is going on here?  The hew/yew "merger" is nonexistant as has been covered in previous discussion on Talk:Phonemic differentiation  "Merger" refers to when speakers lose the distinctions between two (or more) phonemes.  This sometimes results in the creation of homophones from previously distinctly pronounced pairs...but the process of becoming homophones is a side-effect of a merger, not the defining characteristic thereof.  Anyways, the homophonization of hew and yew is not only not a merger, the phenomenta that cause it are already amply covered by two other well-grounded articles:  h-dropping and hypercorrection.  More to the point, however, this article is horribly named.  What "cluster" is being reduced?  Also, please, provide evidence for the assertion that in some dialects of English, /hj/ has coalesced into /ç/!  Where is it "sometimes considered" a type of glide-cluster reduction? Tomer TALK 19:32, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
:I agree it's not a merger, but I don't see what it's got to do with hypercorrection. The cluster that's being reduced is , reducing to . I don't know if anyone's ever claimed there's an accent of English with  as a phoneme, but it's quite widely claimed that  is a possible realization of underlying  in English. References include Gimson, An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 3rd edn. p. 212; Ladefoged, A course in phonetics, 4th edn., p. 144; Wells, Accents of English p. 230. Wells is the one who groups the changes  →  and  →  together under the label "Glide cluster reduction". --Angr/comhrá 20:06, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Narsarsuaq

message: Shouldn't this be titled Narsarsuaq (with one s)? That is the currently accepted Greenlandic spelling.
:I have renamed the article and (I trust) redirected all the links that pointed to Narssarssuaq. (A majority actually pointed to the new spelling.) --Cubdriver 21:09, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: I wonder: can Greenland fairly be described as part of the North American continent? Certainly the church at Brathild (however spelled) is worth mentioning. (I am reasonably sure that the church was built for the Lief 2000 event, and that there is nothing there of Erik's settlement but foundation stones.)
:It is geographically part of North America, look at the separation between Greenland and Ellesmere Island. It is part of the Canadian Shield. It has a NORAD base. 70.55.200.47 00:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: North America

message: The article doesn't state the currect population. How many people are there living there, really? 82.181.197.172 (talk) 13:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Population?

message: Narsarsuaq's summers are less warm than Kangerlussuaq's ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.221.159.200 (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Warmest Summers
Talk:Anshan (Persia)

message: Wikipedia policy is clear on the use of Eras in articles:
:Both the BCE/CE era names and the BC/AD era names are acceptable, but be consistent within an article. Normally you should use plain numbers for years in the Common Era, but when events span the start of the Common Era, use AD or CE for the date at the end of the range (note that AD precedes the date and CE follows it). For example, 1 BC–AD 1 or 1 BCE–1 CE.
It is up to the author(s) of an article to determine the dating system to be used and there must be consistency with each article.  In this case, for a non-Christian topic in a non-Christian region of the world, BCE/CE would seem to make the most sense.  Sunray 19:37, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
There is no consensus on this topic, and SouthernComfort is not the author of the article.  RickK 21:53, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Consensus applies to articles not the general case.  Thus, in this case you are right. Sunray 06:39, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
I have changed the previous spelling of "Tepe Malyan" to "Tappé Malyan". "Tappé", pronounced "Tap-Pé", is a Farsi/Persian word meaning a hill. Usually, but not always, hills that are referred to as "Tap-Pé" are prominent historic sites. This word has entered Turkish, where it is pronounce as "Tepé" and spelled as "Tepe". While writing the name of a site that is in current Turkey as Tepe may be justified, using the same pronounciation and spelling for a site the is in Iran, where locals pronounce it as "Tap-Pé", is a flaw.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.70.153 (talk) 15:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates and numbers in this article
Talk:Cambyses I

message: I can't understand the English in the new section on etymology that discusses Toynbee. I also think there is too much emphasis on Toynbee. Dougweller (talk) 21:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The etymology section is larger than the article was previously. It should be pruned. Debresser (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I thought it might be helpful here on the Talk page to discuss how to discern between Cambyses I and Cambyses II.  There are a couple of things that make confusion easy - and indeed, you'll find many a scholarly work which confuses the two.  Both are the sons of a Cyrus - Cyrus I and Cyrus II. Most frequently, but not always, when Herodotus refers to Cambyses, he is referring to Cambyses II.  An example of an exception to this would be Herodotus I.107.  I have two recommendations for clarity, but welcome any other points from other editors that would help future Wikipedians.  My two are:
# Pay attention to years of life or reign.  Cambyses I is born early 7th century and dies mid-6th century.  Cambyses II reigns for a short period of time in the early 5th century.  If it is 530 BC/BCE or 520s BC/BCE, it is Cambyses II.  If it is around 600 BC/BCE through 580 BC/BCE, it will be Cambyses I.
# Next, pay attention to what kingdom they are associated with.  If it is pre-Persia - and the king is associated with Anshan, Acan, etc. then it will be Cambyses I.  If the language clearly associates it with Persia, it is Cambyses II.
These are just meant as rules of thumb, but will hopefully be helpful. DOstendorff (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambyses I vs Cambyses II 

message: The article contradicts the Cyrus the Great article in making both born c.600 BCE. The evidence in the Encyclopedia Iranica seems to me to favor Cyrus II to have been born then, with Cambyses I c.630 BCE, reigning from c.600-559 BCE:  Also Cyrus I's reign is dated c.640-600 BCE making Cambyses I reign from around 600:    Cornelius (talk) 04:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life and Reign dates of Cambyses I
Talk:Jacques Cassini

message: Cassini crater on the Moon is co-named for both Jacques and his father. On sites where this nomenclature is documented, his name is listed as "Jacques J. Cassini". However I can find no other record of his having a middle name. So this may have been an error. — RJH 19:58, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle name?
Talk:Volunteerism

message: Do not merge - there is sufficient distinction between the overarching principle of altruism and the specific volunteerism to keep them separate articles. Max robitzsch 12:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge with Altruism

message: "There is also growing concern about the effects of neoliberalism in the field of volunteerism, as witnessed by the increasing influence of corporations on the social programming of nonprofit community organisations, particularly through youth work."
Shouldn't this be over in the right-wing conspiracy article? In fact, maybe the whole section. Remember, folks, "A good deed never goes unpunished." is a quip not a truism! JimScott (talk) 15:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: This article is not the place for advertising volunteer opportunities. I have removed those links from /*External links*/ in accordance with the Manual of Style, especially Wikipedia:External links. --Bejnar (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising
Talk:Buck (dog)

message: * Can anybody verify facts about Jack London's dog? or what kind he was?
RB It was never Jack London's dog. It was a dog his landlord my grandfather Marshall and great uncle Louis owned and they allowed him to use. "His father was a St. Bernard and his mother was some kind of collie".
* Also, do Husky dogs really fight among themselves? like the book describe?
RB Yes they do 
Any sources for that? 132.77.4.129 (talk) 16:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)