Talk:Italian Renaissance painting

message: No, don't bother suggesting it. This is a Top Importance article that simply doesn't exist. I'm about to write it and it will be 2 million megabytes long. Neeed coffeee!
--Amandajm 08:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Are you writing all of this from memory? This is shaping up to be a good article, but it will need sources, both inline and a bibliography, to achieve its full potential. I would have thought it would be easier to source as you go, but it seems you're almost done now. I may go and get a few books out to start sourcing it. mais (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: LOL  Amandajm  —Preceding comment was added at 02:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Charming addition to the article

message: I personally think this article should mention Vasari's role in dividing up the Renaissance into different periods and also note his role in increasing the stature of certain artists, though I could conceivably see such things being better suited for an art history article. What do you all think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weygander (talk • contribs) 04:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a section on Historiography would be a good addition to the article. Amandajm (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vasari 

message: English wikipedia must be praised for it is almost complete in what concerns Visual Art: it includes even entries about a large number of italian painters of medium or minor importance. A lot of these ones lack in italian wikipedia! That shows that often foreign people are more familiar with our great past culture than us Italians: unfortunately. Vir Italicus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.16.243.126 (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou for this comment! Amandajm (talk) 09:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Though one should point out that many are written by Italians, like User:Attilios in particular. Johnbod (talk) 11:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A praise 

message: I have just removed the template which is called Art in Italy or Italian art or Italian painting or some such. I cannot locate the page of the template itself. 
The template, which was already very long, has recently been expanded by the insertion of a great number of images causing it to extend a further six inches down the page. These generic templates essentially offer links to other, different articles and do not have direct bearing on the substance of the article itself. Templates of this type work well when they are horizontal and at the foot of the page. When they are vertical they take up the space that is usually used for illustrating the article. In the case of an art article, these illustrations are vital, and this huge template forms a very destructive intrusion. If someone could take the info and make a horizontal box, it would be to good purpose. As it is it is a continual obstruction to the article itself. 
Amandajm (talk) 16:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean ? I would like to have it placed in the article. Just because it's big is not a reason to remove it. --Scriberius (talk) 07:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of a template

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Italian Renaissance painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120920044914/http://shop.getty.edu/products/florence-at-the-dawn-of-the-renaissance-978-1606061268 to http://shop.getty.edu/products/florence-at-the-dawn-of-the-renaissance-978-1606061268
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a specific section of Cosme Tura and this one set of paintings he did.  This painter is rarely mentioned in any art history books.  It seems his presence here was just the whim/personal preference of someone.  I proposed to delete his section.
::Oppose that! Seriously, read more (and better) art history books. Johnbod (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? The balance seems about right to me, and the whole article is pretty long now. If anything is done, the first thing would be to add back Cosme Tura!  Johnbod (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Este family of Ferrara. Cosmè Tura's

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion