lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Norton Computing

message: Is there a good reason for Norton Commander to be the notable product? I would have thought that Norton Utilities would have been. It has been around longer, and I believe it had sold more copies while Peter Norton Computing still existed as an independent company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.246.58 (talk • contribs) 
: I personally strongly think that Norton Commander is a notable product too! It was a fairly decent, and maybe the only one, file manager back in the MS-DOS command line days, and it spun off many clones back then (Volkov Commander) and its legacy lived into a version for Windows, but then Windows Commander (now Total Commander) was on the rise (and it is pretty much popular nowadays), so I guess NC was abandoned. And of course Midnight Commander, the Linux NC-lookalike, has been inspired by NC, too! --Vlad|-> 17:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NC

message: So someone put a merge tag on the main article page, but didn't bother starting a discussion on it? That's reason enough to drop the suggestion. But OK, let's discuss now. I disagree, PN the person is separate fromo PNC, they just overlap. I fanything, PNC would be merged into Symantec. Dovid (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I also disagree. Griffinofwales (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Flag of Belize

message: This image needs to be cleaned up...there appears to be a brown construction line that should be removed. Mloester 20:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

message: axnwot?81.11.206.29 (talk) 16:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  tools 

message: The standardisation reportedly due in 2019 seems not yet to be known to the web. If that’s wrong or when it changes, please edit or post here. JDAWiseman (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: speaking of standardisation, is there any official construction schemeʔ̦ at least for the main field, i.e. thickness of the bands, and diametre of the disc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:984:A320:1C3C:3BF4:4ED8:62B2 (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardisation 
Talk:Airco DH.2

message: The D.H.2 served on the Macedonian front in the Balkans theatre of the First World War. I have made some changes both to the text, and to references, to make it plain that this has nothing whatever to do with the current controversy over the use of the word "Macedonia".  Soundofmusicals 12:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Macedonia

message: I have deleted this - in spite of being 100% of seeing it somewhere myself, I just can't find it in any of my sources - by all means restore it, as it's got "colour", but only if you can find a source. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 11:57, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a verifiable second citation for the phrase 8 January 2014Mel Wren (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spinning Incinerator" 
Talk:Emergency power system

message: To my opinion the Lemma is not correct.
Only the first sentence deals with "Emergency Lighting".
The remaining is more "Emergency power supply"
in general. Maybe someone can take care on this.
-- 172.179.83.114 20:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nahuel Huapi National Park

message: Yeah... I'm only here because this made the front page, but I found it unlikely that Nahuel meant tiger, because there are no New World tigers. An investigation indicates it means puma. 133.101.207.16 (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In mapudungun the word for puma is pangui (for example Panguipulli), while nahuel meansNuestro Tigre "El Nahuel de las Pampas"]. Asociación Civil Alihuen jaguar. Before the massive immigration of Europeans to the zone jaguars were common in these areas. Now they are extint here. The translation into tiger is a mistranlation from Spanish were jaguars were called tigres. Dentren | Talk 17:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of ''Nahuel''

message: this area was presumably all covered by volcanic ash from the 2011 Puyehue eruption - I  guess there will have been other impact too, but it probably deserves a mention somewhere EdwardLane (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volcanic Ash 
Talk:Dr Weil

message: There appear to be about several different "Dr.s Weil" on Wikipedia right now, including:
Dr. Andrew Weil, which this page currently redirects to,
Dr._Weil_%28Mega_Man_Zero%29, the villain from MegaMan Zero, and
Andr%C3%A9_Weil, a famous mathematician.
The name confusion has been enough to cause confusion in the off-wikipedia, as well.  Should it be changed from a redirect to a disambiguation page?
--Yrogerg 20:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this be a Disambig?
Talk:Johan Neeskens

message: We can debate this all we want, but the Encyclopedia Judaica lists Johan Neeskens as being Jewish. It is certainly a credible source -NYC2TLV (talk) 10:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johan Neeskens and Judaism 
Talk:Denny Regrade

message: Should this be combined with Denny Hill? --Lukobe 20:10, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense.  So would it be combined as "Denny Regrade" or as "Denny Hill"? I'd suggest the former since that has been the most common parlance in the city in my experience. -- wac(talk contrib) 07:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm with you. "Denny Regrade" is what it is now--"Denny Hill" is what it once was. --Lukobe 11:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also wondering if "Denny Regrade" and "Denny Regrade, Seattle, Washington" should be combined. I'm thinking yes. --Lukobe 07:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gangan Comics

message: the article contradicts it slef the title says monthly shonen ganga yet, in the article it self it says weekly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.152.189 (talk • contribs) 
:All sources point to a monthly publication - Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 08:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's monthly. There has never been a weekly Gangan. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Monthly or weekly?

message: The list of comics contain several comics no longer being published in Gekkan Shōnen Gangan.  For example, Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories ended almost a year ago.  Shouldn't these be removed from the list? (58.188.97.134 12:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't think it's necessary to remove comics no longer published in Gekkan Shōnen Gangan.  Even though some of them are no long serialized in the magazine, they are still published in volumes under the Gangan Comics (GC) print label. As stated in the page, Gangan Comics is the print label of Square Enix, where the manga is published as released volumes in actual bookform. Gekkan Shonen Gangan is a manga magazine from Square Enix that serializes monthly works of different mangakas within it. (DarkIceEdge (talk) 09:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of comics 

message: I want to add this site in Ex links.
http://83
1rec.blog99.fc2.com/blog-entry-39.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.221.248.237 (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is blacklisted, so it's impossible.--十八 22:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: The lead messes up two different terms:
*, a monthly comic magazine.
*, a brand name for paperback compilations of comics published in the former. Comics from the other Gangan publications appear in compilations under other brand names, e.g.  and .
I'll try fixing the lead, but it would probably also be appropriate to rename the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead problem 

message: ::According to a translation of the Japanese Wikipedia entry for Monthly G Fantasy, Monthly G Fantasy is not Shounen. "Audience: Junior and senior high school students men and women." "Summery: Magazine As the name suggests, works a lot of the fantasy comic is, work for women, Youth for the center in particular."
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fja.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%25E6%259C%2588%25E5%2588%258AG%25E3%2583%2595%25E3%2582%25A1%25E3%2583%25B3%25E3%2582%25BF%25E3%2582%25B8%25E3%2583%25BC%23G.E3.83.95.E3.82.A1.E3.83.B3.E3.82.BF.E3.82.B8.E3.83.BC.E3.82.B3.E3.83.9F.E3.83.83.E3.82.AF.E3.82.B9&act=url  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:B580:80B:815D:B2A3:5CDC:9100 (talk) 10:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monthly G Fantasy is NOT Shounen. 

message: * do you think this should hair be a list? Seems to be totally geared in that direction... What do people think? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this just be a list?
Category talk:Tierra del Fuego Province

message: It seems that this category was created with the Argentine province in mind, but that's obviously a bit problematic because Chile also has a province with the same name. So, this should be renamed to :Category:Tierra del Fuego Province (Argentina) or something like that. On the other hand, most of the articles currently in this category are not Argentina-specific, and I think those should be moved to :Category:Tierra del Fuego. --Jonik 20:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering :Category:La Rioja Province (Argentina) and :Category:Córdoba Province (Argentina), you are probably right. . Feel like doing it yourself? Mariano(t/c) 08:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Tierra del Fuego Province
Talk:Raymond Gosling

message: I think there should be some mention of the work of the Cambridge team in the introduction. Mention of the KCL team in isolation looks odd.
Notreallydavid (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentence 

message: Gosling, Franklin and Wilkins did crucially valuable experimental work that led others to deduce the structure of DNA.  They did not deduce the structure of DNA. Ttocserp (talk) 01:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence overstates the case
Talk:Erechtheus

message: Shouldn't the play be given a separate entry?  See http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/books/review/the-parthenon-enigma-by-joan-breton-connelly.html?nl=books&emc=edit_bk_20140124&_r=0.211.225.34.161 (talk) 09:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Play 

message: Etymology is missing. In the article "Erichthonios", Beekes suggests Pre-Greec origin. However "chthonic" means underground.Jestmoon(talk) 19:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Einstein@Home

message: "As of September 2011, over 300,000 volunteers in 221 countries have participated in the project," That's fairly impressive, considering that there are less than 200 countries in the world. 83.94.210.220 (talk) 06:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  221 countries 

message: Any updates on this? --Closedmouth 08:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "S5 has not yet been run; it is scheduled for late 2005" 

message: Where exactly does it say that Einstein@Home graphics are available under the GFDL licence? I think the licence should be a fair use (screenshot) licence. --ZeroOne (talk | @) 19:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GFDL image? 

message: I've altered the article wording slightly to emphasize that Einstein@Home is searching for continuous-wave sources (of any kind) and not binary inspiral.   These sources may be pulsars.   Or not.  In fact, the term "pulsar" now becomess slightly ambiguous.   The conventional meaning is of a neutron star which produces electromagnetic radiation which periodically sweeps across earth (like a lighthouse beam).   Periodic signals in gravitational waves could be called "gravitational pulsars" but the mechanism may or may not be the same.   Some electromagnetic pulsars may also be gravitational pulsars, but there may be gravitational pulsars which are not electromagnetic pulsars.  We don't know yet.
My changes don't account for this, so further improvments in wording could certainly be useful as long as they keep this point in mind.
--Wormholio 17:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulsars 

message: Einstein@Home is temporarily shut down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.194.131.195 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status
Talk:Children of Mana

message: Isn't this game two player Jedi6 20:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, according to the World of Mana website, it is multiplayer. ~ Hibana 23:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Four players, to be exact. Claude 09:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yah four player co-op --69.81.90.195 02:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-Op?

message: Stop messing with the date. The game was delayed from from Feb. 23rd to March 2nd. Check the World of Mana website.Claude 18:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nintendo announced that it would be October 31st at E3, changing from Fall --69.81.90.195 02:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delayal 

message: It would help if th person who slapped the references label on here would at least care to elaborate on what exactly needs references, and what he/she wants in this odd 'development' section.--Claude 03:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: I see that the character names are changed occasionally? Frick to Ferrick, Tumble to Tamber, Pop to Poppen. Am I missing something here? Is this really the English version of the names? ~Bluerfn 18:29, 03 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not yet anyway. And I don't believe they should be continuously changed like they are until more information on the English version is released. ~ Hibana 22:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some people have managed to get their hands on the English version early, and these changes ahve been confirmed to be the English names.--Claude 03:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character 

message: This article is no longer a stub. Mythi 21:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbiosity 

message: Does anyone know where the 11/01 date is coming from? I've noticed GameFAQs and IGN both spontaneously changed their 10/30 dates without explanation, despite the fact that the official Nintendo site still says 10/30, and the fact that the game did come out today as several stores are selling it as planned. I've tried to correct the GameFAQs date with the official source, but they absolutely refuse to acknolwedge it.--Claude 00:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed date 

message: I just happen to notice that the Production I.G's nav template and cat have been placed on this article, but no where does the article mention the company. Also this game isn't on the company's nav template either. So just what is Production I.G's connection to this game? --Farix (Talk) 19:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They did the animated cutscenes. That detail should be added to the article.--Claude (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the Development heading. ~ Hibana 20:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production I.G's connection 

message: While it is nice and all that this became a featured article.. I quite frankly surprised. Not due to the quality of the article, but because the game was unchallenging and pretty much sucked overall in terms of game play.192.197.142.100 (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article
Talk:Conyza

message: The article says "It propagates not through seed, but by distribution of spores in early summer", but can an Asteraceae have spores???
:An error due to confusion of 'horseweed' with 'horsetail'; I've removed the incorrect text. MPF 23:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spores? 

message: The 'Canada fleabane' species (Conyza canadensis) is not on the list. Link  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.238.72 (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Conyza canadensis'' is on not species list 
Talk:Abisko

message: Contradicting distances to the Arctic Circle: 200 km / 250 km. Can anyone givre a better estimate (should find my own map...)?  Fred-Chess 13:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried figuring it out given the latitudes and it looks like 200 km is the right one (197.5 km to be precise if I've done it right).  I've changed it to 200 now as this seems to be roughly correct. --Brian Josephson (talk) 20:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance to Arctic Circle
Talk:Frequency-resolved optical gating

message: SPIDER deserves it's own page and is not a FROG technique. -- Erik Zeek 20:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved what had been written to spectral interferometry for direct electric field reconstruction.  Do you think that Grennouille deserves it's own article also?  — Laura Scudder ☎ 20:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hmmm...  I was wondering why I got a conflict on the SPIDER page.  GRENOUILLE is a FROG technique, while SPIDER isn't so GRENOUILLE could also live on the FROG page.  The GRENOUILLE device could use its own page because of the interesting way it works.  I'm not ready to write it yet though. -- Erik Zeek 20:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, it's an interesting technique, but unfortunately, I don't feel comfortable writing anything significant on it right now.  I suppose we don't really have to worry about it unless it someday starts to take over this article, and then it can be spun out.  In the meantime I've put in a redirect.  — Laura Scudder ☎ 21:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can do a pretty substantial write-up on GRENOUILLE if desired.Patrick Berry 22:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Unstable (Adema album)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unstable (album) retargeted to Unstable (disambiguation). (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 15:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unstable (album) →  – existence of Unstable (Tetrarch album); both albums share a name and genre HurricaneAmputee (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 April 2023
Talk:Kali River Rapids

message: The article says:
# Ride length: 4:30
# Show length: 3:30
For this attraction, I don't understand the distinction. ManoaChild 20:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I used information from my source I use for the Attraction facts (which could be flawed), living near Disneyland I can't just go ride the attraction for myself to verify, if someone has the accurate information.
I found some sources that say 5 minutes, so I'll remove the "Show length 3:30"  ManoaChild 22:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ride length vs show length
Talk:Aldebert

message: No sources, tagged.--FloNight 20:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: Request for sources left on User:Necrothesp talk page.--FloNight 20:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for sources

message: The Roman Catholic section in the wiki Archangel article Archangel#Roman_Catholic has several cites for Adalbert. One such is http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v10/y1888_057.htm work by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, an 1800s scholar of religion and mysticism. Hope this helps whoever works on the Adalbert article, I personally do not have the background for it. Tkech (talk) 07:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Source 

message: The article currently uses Aldebert and Adalbert interchangably as the name of the person. This should be made consistent. I suspect they are variations of the name in different languages, and as such should be notified at the start of the article. I myself lack the knowledge to make this judgment call. 2001:14B8:201:20:8C3F:2B34:C8A0:61AD (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The inconsistency in using the variant names Aldebert and Adalbert persists. This is very confusing. A knowledgeable editor should look into this and make the necessary changes for a consistent presentation. werldwayd (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldebert or Adalbert? 

message: The attribution to Mainz Anonymous may be incorrect — the article says that the Mainz Anonymous was "a century later" than Pope Zachary's letter of 747, putting it at about 847, but the Mainz Anonymous was written after the First Crusade of 1096 — also, the citation to Shepard is incomplete and I could find no work by Shepard the verify this information - Epinoia (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Atribution
Talk:Queensville, Ontario

message: Here is the list of non-notable stuff removed from the article in conformance to precedents.
* co-operative farm supply
* convenience store with attached diner
* tractor dealership
* auto mechanic shop
* public elementary school
* veterinarian office
* gasoline station.
Several home based businesses are also operated.
Cafe Nervosa | talk 20:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-notable list
Talk:Jeopardy (BBC TV series)

message: it isnt horror
Add the youtube link to the title theme? - http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=BB7bvUweVOo  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.45.145 (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 21:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Jeopardy (TV series) →  – A bare Jeopardy points to our article on the game show Jeopardy! (note the exclamation mark), but this partially disambiguated name points to another series. I don't see WP:DIFFCAPS being useful to distinguish the two as a result, so I think the 2002-04 TV series should be moved to another title and Jeopardy (TV series) should redirect to Jeopardy!. I'm also fine with another disambiguator, such as "2002 TV series" or "UK TV series"; I use "BBC TV series" because that was where this page used to be before it was moved to the current title in 2012. Link count for Jeopardy (TV series) (40, most through the "BBC TV series" redirect), link count for Jeopardy! (over 2000). This probably should just be a technical request, but I want to make sure we're using the right disambiguator. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose and will direct anyone closing this to read the naming convention guideline at WP:NCTV. There are many television series article from different countries and from the same country, we either disambiguate with Year of first rlease, Country of origin, or both. We do not however disambiguate with network. We've worked hard to eliminate that and there is no reason to re-introduce this here. Gonnym (talk) 09:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 May 2023
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Members/User WPMILHIST

message: What do you think about modified version below with link to the project moved to bottom line? Piotr Mikołajski 10:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good idea; I've made the change.  Thanks for the suggestion! Kirill Lokshin 11:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Modified variant proposal