Talk:History of Central America

message: Hello all. My name is Andrew and I am an undergraduate at the University of Toronto. Currently I am taking a course called "History of the Americas: Interaction and Inequality."  My main interests are the conquests of the Aztecs and the Incas, and have been reviewing this topic and other Latin American topics in history.  I made this contribution because I believe that the Indigenous account of the conquest is often overlooked.  Soon, I hope to include more primary Indigenous accounts of the Spanish conquest. I was also uncertain as to how you are all citing this page because i did not notice a bibliography. Vandrew (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed my entry on Aztec Omens for Spanish Conquests and added it to the Spanish Conquest of the Aztecs Empire page. I felt my contribution was more relevant to that Wikipedia entry. --Vandrew (talk) 23:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aztecs and the Incas

message: I did some substantial revision to this article.  The main addition were two paragraphs on why the U.S. of Central America failed.  I also included references to the inter-oceanic canal (historically a subject of great importance), to the invasion by William Walker, and to the present-day Central American parliament.  I left the flag discussion more or less as User:Hajor had it and added mention of the Union's symbols in the appropriate section.  Finally, linked here from the Central America article.  (BTW, it's true that Costa Ricans like me are prejudiced against the Union.  We were so remote and inaccessible that we were never effectively a part of it, and today we regard the regional parliament, to which we don't belong, as a waste of money and a sinecure for retired politicians).  --Eb.hoop 14:50, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: *Good editing. I'd heard the story about the president's wife sewing two Fr. flags together, but with the clarification that the two blue strips on the outside were kept as a nod to the federation. If that's not the case but just integrationist wishful thinking, please make the appropriate changes. (Recommendation for further reading: the FotW site has lots of other interesting information.) –Hajor 20:10, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: *Looks to me like you did a good job. BTW, if you look carefully you'll see that "History of Central America" was already linked to in the "Central America" article, but I think there's nothing wrong with having the link more conspicuous. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 16:08, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. of Central America

message: I'm not surprised at User:Eb.hoop's statement "Costa Rica's flag is not modeled after that of the U.S. of Central America", as I'd always heard that it was. -- Infrogmation 01:23, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I was taught in school (I'm Costa Rican) that the president's wife made the current flag in 1848 by stitching together two French tricolor flags.  This is why the flag has a double-wide red stripe in the middle.  (Costa Rica, by the way, has a long history of resisting Central American integration.) --Eb.hoop 2:10, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting. Both in Guatemala and Honduras I was told that all 5 national flags had the white and blue stripes from the example of the old Federal Central American flag. That Costa Rica's flag has something to do with it has seemed plausible to me also because the coat of arms is quite similar to the old Central American one (I have a couple of old coins from the Federation era with that; I should see if I can get a decent scan from them). Perhaps we should both  see if we can find some more info confirming one way or another-- or else note that contradictary stories seem to be told! Anyway, it seems there is sometimes a different attitude about that part of Central American history in Honduras and Guatemala, some people tend to romanticize the Federation-- it sounds like the situation is quite different in Costa Rica. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 02:36, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Costa Rica's flag

message: I redirected "United States of Central America" and similar names here to "History of Central America" back when Wikipedia was much smaller and with less info on the topic. What do people think about splitting that off into a seperate article? If so, what is the best title?  -- Infrogmation 01:23, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's fine as it is.  The "United States of Central America" was short-lived and virtually inoperative while it lasted.  It think's its adequately covered a by section of the "History of Central America."  --Eb.hoop 2:10, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: United States of Central America

message: This is a good start but I hardly consider this to be a B-class history article. Even including its bibliography it would only come to four printed pages. I realize that individual country histories can be consulted for more information, but this article needs additional work, in my opinion.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.131.116 (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Article as a Whole Needs More Work

message: These countries developed thanks to agriculture and the revenue helped to modernize at least some of them, especially the Economy of Costa Rica. Much of it was initially owned by American companies, of course. 
This is such a huge factor in their history that I am amazed it has not been covered at all. I added a paragraph but there should be a full section about Agriculture. Peter K Burian (talk) 01:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article ignores the history of agriculture 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Central America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225191811/http://www.doaks.org/GoldandPower/GoldandPower02.pdf to http://www.doaks.org/GoldandPower/GoldandPower02.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello everyone! My name is Matthew and I am a junior History and Political Science double major at the College of Wooster who is currently taking a class entitled 'Modern Latin America'. I have come across this article in the process of researching the period of Mexican occupation in Central America from 1822-1823. Despite this being a fairly short period, I found the details on this period to be somewhat lacking, and so I hope to expand on them. Further, there are not really any sources that directly address the annexation in this part of the article, but I believe I could do this article a service by locating some scholarly sources on the topic and adding them in to strengthen the claims made. To clarify, this would include edits to the first and second paragraphs under the "Independence" section of the article but before the "Federal Republic of Central America" section. I look forward to making a useful contribution to this article!--00matthew2000 (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Independence of Central America