lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:FreeBSD jail

message: This page should probably be at FreeBSD jail, since it isn't being used a proper noun anywhere but the title. Unfortunately, it requires an admin to move since some anon created an article at that link... --Gwern  (contribs) 03:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the same thing. I fixed it. - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name and move 

message: Besides a *BSD variant or two, I haven't seen this feature in other *NIXes. Anyone have an idea how one could do this in Linux or Mac OS X? I think it'd be neat to allow an app (e.g. a webserver) to jail itself for added security.Twir (talk) 16:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Solaris Zones are a similar concept, and I think Solaris Containers as well. Stuff like OpenVZ, Virtuozzo Containers, and Sandboxie are also similar. 184.65.77.230 (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other OSes with this feature? 

message: * This article is clearly written in a promotional tone.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Additionally, interaction between processes that are not running in the same jail is restricted.
; Restricted 
* Kept within certain limits; limited: on a restricted diet.
* Excluding or unavailable to certain groups: a restricted area.
* Of, relating to, or being information available only to authorized persons.
So which is it? — MaxEnt 17:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  They can still communicate over TCP and over socket files (if their file systems overlap). Shared memory is also not separated (and thus disabled by default for security reasons). 184.65.77.230 (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Constricted or verboten?
Talk:Torture flights

message: This article is extremely informally written to the point that to me it reads like a letter to the editor. The language "if they are lucky" and "...if they are unlucky" should be changed. There are a number of copy edit fixes needed, including the misspelling of rendition. This is sub-par writing.
There is no provable basis, even though I personally agree with the statement, for "These people are being “disappeared” by Western democracies such as the United States and United Kingdom to avoid due process and regulations against torture." The blanket statements, unprovable claims, and general style of the article make it seem to me to be highly POV and biased against the U.S. administration. The article also shows the inherent bias in Wikipedia by referring to the U.S. as America, discounting Canada, Mexico, and all the other countries of the Americas. I agree that there should be an article on extraordinary rendition, but this is not it. I would support a merge of the actual facts that are here to that article.--WAvegetarian 07:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Balinese language

message: Also see Kawi language
Kawi-balineesch-nederlandsch woordenboek (1897)
https://archive.org/details/kawibalineeschn00tuukgoog
Kawi-Balineesch-Nederlandsch glossarium op het Oudjavaansche Râmâyana. Bewerkt door H.H. Juynboll. Uitg. door het Koninklijk Instituut voor de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië (1902)
https://archive.org/details/kawibalineeschne00juynuoft
Rajmaan (talk) 14:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balinese and Kawi language materials 

message: A history section would be nice, including why this language originated and has survived, witn contrasting to other indo languages Balupton (talk) 09:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been long on my to do list. Old Balinese inscriptions go back to the 9th century, so there is much to tell. Hopefully I can get to the task soon. –Austronesier (talk) 17:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Prehaps the audio sample should be changed if possible to one without such loud background noises that distract from what shes saying  Thomas Norren (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio sample changed?
Talk:Bundaberg

message: It seems a lot content into the lede section rather than into one of the existing sections for that topic. This is leading to inconsistency, e.g. the economy is many things in the lede but predominantly sugarcane in the relevant section. Can I draw people's attention to the relevant policy Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, particularly that the lede section should be a summary of the article contents, and ask you to shift content you have added to the lede to the appropriate section and reconcile it with the content already there. Thanks Kerry (talk) 03:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lede section is getting very large and inconsistent with the article body
Talk:Rachel Gibson (Alias)

message: There is a proposal to move Rachel Gibson (writer) to Rachel Gibson, removing the DAB page, and to then put a hat note on that page. This sounds reasonable to me, but I bring it up here in case anyone objects who is watching this page. See Talk:Rachel Gibson (writer). 128.232.1.193 (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move proposal
Talk:List of cognitive scientists

message: I propose we remove from the list Karl Popper who has very, very little to do with cognitive science. IMO we should ask: could one reasonably add its page to Categories:Cognitive scientists? The answer is obviously: no. I  suggest we adopt a similar criterion to decide whether one page can be listed on this page.
--DarTar 07:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I built out much of :Category:Cognitive scientists, let me explain how I decided whether or not to include someone. First, I looked at pages that linked to Cognitive science or Cognitive linguistics. For anyone whose article unequivocally stated that they did research in "cognitive science" (or a subdiscipline) or that they are affiliated with a Department of Cognitive Science (or equivalent), I added them to the category. If their article said anything about their work being controversial or disputed and I was not familiar with their work, I left them out. I would not have included Karl Popper using those guidelines, since I don't know him and his article says nothing about his involvement in cognitive science. I'd say the key criterion is that the person's article explain their connection to cognitive science. Along these lines, I would also leave John Searle off of this list as well. Mike Dillon 15:46, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed Popper and Searle, in line with the comments, as well as Penrose. Added Block, Goldman, and Johnson. The list could still use some updating, but my brain hasn't booted up yet today. JMD (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Karl Popper
Talk:Greyshirt

message: OK, I don't recall enough of the Greyshirt miniseries to fix up the origin, but the recent edit by Brown Shoes22 makes me cringe.  I have set this page for "watch", and will clean it up once I do a reread of the issues. I know the writer is dyslexic (my code name having nothing to do with him, just a coincidence), but the thought process at work is virtually unreadable. Dyslexic agnostic 07:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to clean things up.  Fell free to take it further.  --Emb021 20:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: As an involved administrator I would like to explain where we are. Kwamikagami closed the discussion on August 6. He and I carried out what was reported as the result of this discussion. Dohn Joe has reopened the discussion. If the reopened discussion reaches a different conclusion, I will carry it out. For now I would prefer to leave things as they are (based on the August 6 closure of the discussion) until the discussion is closed again. Meanwhile I'll try to reconstruct what has happened, to facilitate discussion. Please correct me if I get anything wrong.
*From its creation in 2007 until July 16, the article about the comic character was called "Greyshirt".
*On July 16, In ictu oculi moved it to "Greyshirt (comics)"
*On July 16, Dohn joe moved it back to "Greyshirt". 
*On July 20, In ictu oculi opened this discussion, proposing that the disambiguation page should be called "Greyshirt" and the comic character should be called "Greyshirt (comics)". 
*On July 20, In ictu oculi created a disambiguation page called "Greyshirt (disambiguation)". By July 21, after input from several other editors, it looked like this: . Note that it was formatted in a way that implies the comic book character is the primary use.
*On August 6, Kwamikagami closed the discussion as "moved". He moved "Greyshirt" to "Greyshirt (comics)" leaving a redirect. He then requested speedy deletion of  the redirect page, so that the disambiguation page could be moved there to "Greyshirt".
*On August 6 I deleted "Greyshirt". I then moved "Greyshirt (disambiguation)" to "Greyshirt", leaving a redirect. I also reformatted the entries on the DAB page so that "Greyshirt (comics)" is no longer formatted as the primary use.
So here is how things stand now:
*"Greyshirt" is a disambiguation page with four entries.
*"Greyshirt (comics)" is about the comic character.
*"Greyshirts" is about the South African political movement.
*The DAB page also refers to the Greyshirts in the novel "The President Vanishes".
*The DAB page also refers the use of the term in college athletics. --MelanieN (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Administrator's comment
Talk:Juiced (video game)

message: Shouldn't the ad be mentioned? I saw the ad in question before I even saw or heard about the game. 209.33.36.146 07:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That ad... *sigh* WhateverTS 08:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viral Ad 

message: Are the images of the original 'Juiced' or 'Juiced Eliminator'?
--Short stop 12:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The game on consoles. --Thorpe | talk 10:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Did a monkey type out the plot? it makes no sense, and i need some decent info if i want to get this game. --A Person With A Listening Problem 23:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 
Talk:Mahagama Sekara

message: I know there were two previously deleted versions. I hope this one is acceptable.--T. Anthony 07:44, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Punjab Regiment (Pakistan)

message: Hi, I'm working on an article on the Mahar Regiment. I found something about how the 111th Mahars were merged into the 71st Punjabs in 1921. Can anyone tell me if the 71st Punjabs were a West Punjabi or an East Punjabi Regiment? Kunal 07:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 71st Punjab Regiment (1921)

message: I added the template of Indian national Army to the Punjab Regiment (Pakistan) article. This is because the  Hindustan Field Force was derived with substantial numbers of troops from the 14th Punjab regiment who were captured during the Malayan campaign or at the Fall of Singapore. After the partition, 14th Punjabs passed on to Pakistan, and hence I added this template to the article. I hope I have explained why this was added. I am adding this template back to the article. If it is felt this is unjustified, could you please leave a message on my page before you revert. CheersRueben lys 21:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Indian National Army]]

message: AoA,  Sir mere papa ghulam rasool 2 punjab regiment  mai job krty thy unki death Ho gai hai.  Mai army my job krna chahti hun ta k apny choty bhean bhaio ka asra bn skon.  Tell me about for this please
 Rukhsana parveen (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dear, Sir
Talk:History of the U.S. public debt

message: It would be nice to see inflation-adjusted figures (for whatever range that's feasible), and as percentage of GDP and per capita. -- Beland 08:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel in my opinion, that the table is very mis-leading. Where is the surplus that President Clinton created and yes, he did create a Surplus.MagnumSerpentine9-7-6
RE: Clinton Surplus -- If we define "surplus" as an amount that reduces the public debt, there have been no surpluses since 1957 when Eisenhower was president (Republican with Democratic control of Congress.) 
However, if we define another term, let's call it "slur+", in some other way that excludes enough costs (such as interest on the public debt) then a slur+ can be reported from 1994 onward while the dot.com bubble was inflating and swelling federal tax revenues. The growing bubble and its flood of tax income to the federal government lasted from 1994 through most of 2001 when the dot.com bubble began to burst and the World Trade Center terrorist attacks occurred. These events brought on a recession that exposed questionable financial conditions at such companies as Enron, WorldCom, etc that led to record bankruptcies. (Record to that time, since surpassed by Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, etc.) 
At that time (as now) deficit spending was initiated to bring the economy out of a recession and that was the end of the "slur+." The gap between income and spending grew larger yet when a questionable war with Iraq started and even larger when tax cuts were implemented to stimulate the slowing economy.
-----------------------------------------------  
To answer your question, the surplus slowly dissolved through president Bush's regime in Iraq. Then he started deficit spending, which may not be covering the rate of inflation.
Should the date in the first line read 2008?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.51.143 (talk) 04:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion request

message: The first table shows data on interest going back to 1977, but the cited source only gives data back to 1988. Whence come the additional data? Wikiant (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data
Talk:Ectoplasm

message: I took out that tripe about the ghosts. ApocalypseCow 23:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Removal of "#Ghosts, made of ectoplasm, despite being able to walk through doors, are known to be able to stop bullets.") 

message: "Ectoplasm is also a term used to describe the vapour appearing on the wings of an aircraft when it is performing high-energy manoeuvres. ... See also St. Elmo's Fire. ... The study of this effect was the focus of the famous Philadelphia experiment."
I can't say for sure, but AFAIK these three things are completely unrelated to each other. Anybody can shed light on this? -- Syzygy 11:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on the Philadelphia Experiment makes no mention of ectoplasm.  The article's need for cleanup and verification notwithstanding, I think it's pretty well established that the focus of the experiment (real or hoax) was invisibility and/or teleportation, not ectoplasm or St. Elmo's Fire. 12.22.250.4 22:57, 89 wassup niggaz November 2006 (UTC)Vandalism by User:86.58.38.187 (User talk:86.58.38.187) has been struck thru and miniaturized by me. Jerzy•t 10:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ("I delete thee, I delete thee, I delete thee!") 

message: Is this a disambiguation page, or an article?  It has too much information for a disambiguation page, IMO, but also discusses multiple independent subjects.  It should be one or the other. JulesH 10:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True. We should split it up. I'll start. --Hob Gadling 15:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Evidently the observation that the accompanying Dab needed splitting did not result in merging part or all of this talk page into what is now talk: Ectoplasm (paranormal). I'm done for now, but an edit session by me within the next day or so should begin with considering whether anything on this talk page really is about the Dab page (hmm, i assume at least the split proposal is); that will determine which is appropriate: merging, or splitting off part of, this talk page, to Talk:Ectoplasm (paranormal).--Jerzy•t 10:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced talk 
Talk:Flag of Pakistan

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjgdh5 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms of the Mughal Empire

message: I cannot see reference 6.  I would like a valid reference for the text.  6 is used for citation a few times...--YoshWK (talk) 08:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 

message: The article currently mentions that some Amiruddin Kidwai designed the flag and used this ref:
*https://web.archive.org/web/20131026022407/http://pakistanembassyjapan.com/content/national-flag-and-anthem
I removed the ref (per WP:CIRCULAR) as it was clearly content copied from Wikipedia. Even the Kidwai article uses this ref "Encyclopedia of Pakistanika By Qsim Mehmood" to say that he designed the flag but the ref is unverifiable.
The only official/govt. ref in the article (https://web.archive.org/web/20080117160833/http://www.pak.gov.pk/Flag.aspx) mentions that Jinnah designed the flag.
Some information can be found on Flags of the World as to who designed the flag but it lists three designers (Kidwai, Jinnah, and one Altaf Hussain) and the information is ambiguous at best. In light of this I suggest that Kidwai be removed from the article as the designer of the flag unless a reliable source which explicitly states so can be found. Gotitbro (talk) 02:45, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: * I have removed Kidwai's mention from the article per the above info. Gotitbro (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designer of the Flag? 

message: Pakistan zindabad 37.111.128.67 (talk) 05:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan 

message: J 95.12.119.89 (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hbh 

message: Add. Also, transliteration of it. Editmakerer (talk) 04:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA transcription of Urdu name
Talk:North York

message: This article needs a lot of work to get it up to the same standards as Scarborough, Ontario. I recommend the following:
*expanded history section
*removal of the mayors/reeves list to a separate article
*a geography section which could include the North York Centre text
*an expanded demographic section
*a climate section
*combine the sports and notable people section into an Arts and Culture section
That will do for starters. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have improved the passage slightly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.53.222 (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Bombed the demographics section which was the worst part about the article - largely POV and unsourced. 2001 was the last census year of the unified North York. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs work
Talk:Prafulla Chandra Ray

message: I tried accessing the external link "A Biography". It gives page not found. --UB 08:39, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've found several sources - contemporary and otherwise - that spell his name "Rây", with an circumflex over the 'a'. Should the article be renamed to that? DS (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources include  (2001),  (1933, citing another 1933 document),  1937 review of a 1935 biography,  (1986),  (1932) , and  (1925).  .... okay, I've convinced myself, especially since some of those are publications by Rây. DS (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Accents?

message: Voice 2402:3A80:4148:3D0D:578:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography of prafulla Chandra ray
Talk:Spook

message: Spook also means a lot of different things (defination). Shouldn't there be a disambiguation page??? 59.93.131.67 09:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: the comment above refers to a prior version of the page, which has since been deleted to make way for move. TJRC (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Flag of Costa Rica

message: Costa Rica's first president was not Juan Rafael Mora Porras and, strictly, Costa Rica doesn't have a coat of arms, but a shield. It would be difficult to call it a coat of arms considering that there aren't any arms in it, and the removal of the two stars of it was done by 1964, when the president of Costa Rica was Francisco Orlich Bolmarcich, and not Jose Figueres.--Ornitorrinco 21:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: The article also states that there is only a civil "ensign", but not a flag, while the caption says that is the  "flag and ensign"... What is the truth?... -- NIC1138 20:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag at all? 

message: Modifications to the national coat of arms has been done twice by law passed in 1964 and 1998. So,should the national flag have a reflection of these changes?74.125.185.16 (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modifications to the national coat of arms in 1964 and 1998 

message: I think this article have it backwards, there is the flag with just the five bands, and there is the "Pabellón Nacional" (government flag?) used strictly for government events, offices and duties and such solemnities. So instead of focusing in the government flag, the article should focus on the regular country flag, what it deems here as civil flag. Same happens at the Costa Rica Infobox.  I don't know it there is a parallel in other country for this situation, but the Pabellón Nacional would be kind of like embedding the Seal of the President in the USA flag... It doesn't represent the whole country, just a small sector of it, the government. 
Check the corresponding Spanish articles es:Costa Rica and es:Bandera de Costa Rica. Where the situation is reversed, and is what to us Costaricans sounds correct, due to Civic Education courses at school. --Roqz (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bandera vs. Pabellón Nacional
Talk:Finn Brothers

message: Would anyone, prehaps someone who actually owns the album (!) like to start a page on Finn (1995)? I'd be happy to work on the infobox if someone else could contribute a few words on introduction and upload a cover. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Domster (talk • contribs) 
Sure. Let me know please if still interested. --mallitch 18:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is that a viable utterance in NZ English?  It sounds like a AmE-ism to me.  (And come to that, awkward as all heck.)  84.203.37.10 (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Finn Brothers is"... 
Talk:Thorold Tunnel

message: This just occurred to me -- does anyone know if during construction they were digging under the existing canal, or did they wait until winter when shipping season was over, block off and drain a section of the canal, dig the tunnel in the bottom and then cover it up? The former makes more sense, especially when considering that the tunnel also passes under some service reservoirs, but the presence of a downhill lock nearby would make potential draining simplified...
Just out of curiosity, and to make sure what I wrote on Townline Tunnel (... the Thorold Tunnel had to be dug underneath the existing waterway) is correct. --qviri 09:10, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  construction
Talk:Namur

message: should motocross not get amention somewhere, you can evne see the track in the photo from the citadel. 81.79.147.5 08:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Motocross

message: The name needs its pronunciation indicated, for English-language readers and for transcription into non-roman alphabets. -- Deborahjay (talk) 08:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: How it is possible that Flanders' Lion is the coat of arms of the Wallonia capital?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.77.240 (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms? 

message: I would suggest this as an "external link!";  http://www.swaen.com/antique-map-image-of.php?id=3441  69.92.23.64 (talk) 02:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Hello, ^ Population per municipality as of 1 January 2016 (XLS; 397 KB) will not be found. Best regards -- Drahdiwaberling (talk) 22:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References