lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cosmo Park

message: I would be great to have a park map on this page.  Anyone know how we would go about this? HornColumbia 22:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a park map on this page  under the picture, but it's a PDF I don't know how to convert it to an image. That's the only map I know about. Me5000 18:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I could convert this but the copyright status is unknown on the map. I don't see any sections on copyright on what's on the Columbia city web site. Polpo 00:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

message: On this site  under the picture it claims that the skate park is recognized nationwide. Is this true? I did a search and found nothing about the skate park indicating nationwide recognition. Me5000 15:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbia Skate Park 
Talk:Dennis Kucinich 2008 presidential campaign

message: Please? Editorofthewiki 22:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, what phallic images?--JayJasper (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone remove the phallic images? 

message: Clearly, the "endorsement" from Joe Biden on the provided youtube video is a joke- when the segment was taped Biden was still in the race and would thus not be endorsing anyone but himself. Therefore I propose the endorsement of Joe Biden be removed from the page.
Chewrockan (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biden's endorsement 
Talk:1890 AHAC season

message: Dan Diamonds book lists statistics covering the challenge matches only. I have not read weirs book. However since those stats appear not to include the games from Ottawa. I think listing statsistics regarding challenge games only would be appropriate. I will be updating accordingly. But please feel free to revert back if exhibition games should be included in the statistics Ottawa4ever (talk) 14:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats
Talk:Kerr Neilson

message: This is an article about one of Australia's most successful businessmen who is one of Australia's richest men and appears in the media on a frequent basis.Rattlesnake6646 05:07, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, but you needed to include this information early on to avoid the non-notable tag.  All I saw was a "fund manager" I'd never heard of, and I can think of a few who aren't notable right in my own town.  If he's exceptionally wealthy and gets loads of media exposure (even if concentrated mainly in one country), then his notability is unquestionable, but when I placed the tag neither fact was present in this article. -- Dethme0w 06:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

text: needs independent references Jimfbleak 05:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lucyscroope has made a significant edit that, in part, should not be placed in the lead and, in other parts, relates to Neilson's former wife and are not relevant in this article, at all. The use of Kerr and Judith throughout the article implies that the editor may know them personally, including a reference to South Africa (described as 'here' (sic.)), and not taking a neutral point of view. Having said all that, it would appear that the editor is relatively new to Wikipedia and acted in good faith. However, a major reconstruction of the article has commenced to restore some objectivity. Finally, in no way, in its current form, is this article a stub. Rangasyd (talk) 10:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting edit | November 2020
Talk:Palisades Interstate Park Commission

message: Palisades Interstate Park redirects here.  Is there an article on the park itself, though?  https://goo.gl/maps/6prhFqVFkFQJ33k4A for the link, for clarity - the Interstate Park with the rock scramble and all.  I don't think I see it - should that article be created?  SnowFire (talk) 16:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why not, all the other parks in the commission are treated separately. If not its own article, the park (along with its infobox) at least warrants its own section in The Palisades (Hudson River). Ninepointturn (talk) 21:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing article
Talk:Spanish Civil War/Archive 4

message: copied from Talk:Spanish Civil War/to do:
why is a propaganda speech by benito mussolini cited as the source for numbers on people killed in the uprisings preceding the spanish civil war?  can we really consider a speech that characterizes the U.S. as a puppet of Jewish financiers as a reliable source for numbers of people killed in Spain?
—This unsigned comment was added by 199.212.53.54 (talk • contribs) 27 March 2006.
: The footnoting mechanism seems to be messed up: superscript 3 seems to lead to footnote 2, and there is no footnote 3. I'm guessing that footnotes 1 and 2 are meant to go the same place. If no one can say definitively in the next few days, I'll fix it on this presumption. - Jmabel | Talk 16:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations messed up? 

message: I think this is a really excellent article, but if someone with good editing skills could go through and try to make sure that claims are balanced on both sides, I think it would be even stronger. An example: anti-clerical violence. It is documented that it occured, and the article does a good job of showing that, but we could use the context of that violence, which is that many common people perceived the Church as a tool used by their so-called oppressors to maintain a status quo which did not serve their interests, and there is at least some validity to that view. My point is absolutely NOT that we should "take sides" but rather that there WERE two (or more) sides to every aspect of this conflict.
-A
:...or think of it in the context of Soviet Russia. Communism meant atheism. There was no room for religion, with especially brutal killings taking place. It's hard to portray nuns as oppresors of the old system, somehow justifying their mass massacres. The church's traditional dominance is already mentioned in the article. Ksenon 18:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The only need to mention aggreesion against the church in this article would be to display it´s simplistic propaganda use. The numbers and stories are inflated, simple-minded propaganda by the facists, that was created to demonize the Republic as an atheist commie state. --81.71.33.141 19:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance

message: I added Langston Hughes as associated with the Republican side, but I am a little unclear as to what qualifies someone as associated with it. I'm sure you could make an endless list of people "associated" with one side, so what are the limiting criteria? He was a relatively important figure and did declare his support for the Republican side, although I'm not sure how much, if any, direct involvement he had. Anyway, that sounds good enough for me, but if anyone disagrees that's what that nifty "edit" button is for.
Nouseforaname312 07:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Associated with...?
Talk:Spanish Civil War/Archive 5

message: Robert Capa died in 1954. I'm not an expert on copyright, but I believe that under both US and UK copyright law, the copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author.  Some other English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, etc) may have either 50 years or 70 years. So the famous Robert Capa photo (soldier at the moment of being shot) is still under copyright in most English-speaking countries and cannot be used here, and "fair use" doesn't apply in this case. -- Curps 05:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I read somewhere that there are suspicions about its genuinity. So it could be as staged as the Iwo Jima and Reichstag ones. It is also as iconic as those though. --Error 00:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It has been questioned. The usual doubts expressed have been about how he managed to snap at so perfect a moment. I don't think there is anything definitive about it being faked, though. - Jmabel | Talk 05:19, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Capa photo 

message: *The information anti-clerical violence comes from an unreliable source. Moreover, although Loyalist atrocities are mentioned in the very first paragraph, Rebel atrocities are not. This must be fixed urgently. BillMasen 16:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: unreliable because? The Jackal God 23:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Beevor for the lurid atrocities is not enough, unless he is quoting from one of the aforementioned works. Beevor's books are 'popular' military history and are full of 'survivor's accounts, hearsay etc. Please source the well-throwing and rosary swallowing. Near the bottom of article theres a photo of the bridge than Nationalists threw republicans off of - the Puente Nuevo bridge. This is well documented but the Ronda killings, quoted from Thomas book and For Whom the Bells Toll are more suspect too as a source-able fact if not claim..  maxrspct ping me  19:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: anti-clerical violence (2006 May)
Talk:Aaron Webber

message: I'm literally sitting with Aaron Webber right now. He's making me write this. He's pissed that his article is so short.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.164.88 (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: There's an article on the movie Whole New Thing, which apparently exists without problems of notability. If that's notable enough to have an article, surely the actor who plays the lead in the movie is notable enough? I'll remove the notability tag, but if anyone wants to dispute me, please do. :) Wilybadger (talk) 03:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Is this the guy who works on the Sonic social network accounts?98.180.222.65 (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm confused
Talk:Adrian Holmes

message: "Intense and fearless in his work, versatile and engaging, and undeniably handsome and charming, actor Adrian Holmes is positioned to become one of the most watched, in demand actors in 2011. Known for his blend of gifted talent and consummate professionalism..." 
I am sure Adrian Holmes is a great actor but I'd like to think that these couple of opening sentences were written by Adrian Holmes himself with his tongue firmly in his cheek.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.187.233.172 (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This made me laugh
Talk:Immaterialism

message: Boswell says nothing about Johnson's foot bleeding. He says instead that 
::After we came out of the church, we stood talking for some time together of Bishop Berkeley's ingenious sophistry to prove the non-existence of matter, and that every thing in the universe is merely ideal. I observed, that though we are satisfied his doctrine is not true, it is impossible to refute it. I never shall forget the alacrity with which Johnson answered, striking his foot with mighty force against a large stone, till he rebounded from it, 'I refute it THUS.'
65.213.77.129 (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is the correct quote then I deleted the part about bleeding. Zeyn1 (talk) 11:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnson anecdote
Talk:100 Years Ago

message: Perhaps a  Good Article? --NormalAsylum (t) 05:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1888 AHAC season

message: I think Dan diamond compiled the stats for this season in total hockey. the ones listed here seem not to make total sense. Can anyone verify this? Thanks Ottawa4ever (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: the stats from ultimate hockey are used. I'll fix this up. I did not have a copy of total hockey before. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: An article from March 5, 1888 in The Toronto Daily Mail talks of three games on March 1: Montreal vs. McGill (8-0), Montreal vs. Crystals (5-2), Victorias vs. Quebec (2-1). The 8-0 games in the article is listed as March 2, and the rest are missing. As the stats seem to be sourced from Total/Ultimate Hockey, could they be wrong? Jmj713 (talk) 02:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: stats
Talk:Comparative negligence

message: The topics are closely connected, both articles cover the overlap, and they're often confused in common parlance. S C Cheese (talk) 17:06, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably be helpful to discuss this in one place. I suggest the discussion you started at Talk:Contributory negligence#Merge with "comparative negligence". Arllaw (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "contributory negligence"
Talk:Kingdom Hearts Coded

message: "Do not start an edit war", says someone intently interested in an edit war instead of actually looking at the article or even going through a search engine for a minute.
MOS:TM doesn't cleanly cover this, only mentioning names that begin with a lowercase letter. However, it does make a statement about using what sources do, which is how we got things like eBay and iPad. As it turns out, a lot of sources actually prefer to use "coded", particularly with Re:coded, simply because it's easier. Many of the sources actually in the article do, particularly Metacritic. IGN does, GameSpot does, Nintendo Life does, Eurogamer does, etc. In light of this, I'm not actually sure why it was moved back to "Coded" in the first place? Despatche (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It was moved because of the discussion above. Pinging those editors as well . - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   Books, newspapers, all respectable publications capitalize proper nouns that otherwise appear lowercase when stylized (not watching, please </code>) czar 20:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisited revisited revisited 

message: Would anyone consider this to be an open world game?
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20110128172700/http://nzgamer.com/ds/reviews/1278/kingdom-hearts-re-coded.htmlDohvahkiin (talk) 08:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open world? 

message: What is the consensus as to whether this game is an open-world game? Heres a sources that states such: http://web.archive.org/web/20110128172700/http://nzgamer.com/ds/reviews/1278/kingdom-hearts-re-coded.htmlNickWX28 (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open-world?
Talk:Last clear chance

message: I have never edited wikipedia and will therefore leave this to others, but I think an indication of what the Restatement is and the fact it may or may not be followed, with this being a matter of state common law, would be useful. a cross referencing link to this would be useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restatements_of_the_Law  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.70.74 (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Niners

message: The article Niners, about a baseball team in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, has been incorporated into the Star Trek articles Take Me Out to the Holosuite and Trekkie.  It was then kept as a redirect to the episode, with categories :Category:Fictional baseball teams and :Category: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. 
A San Francisco 49ers fan then changed the redirect to the article on that team. 
Niners should be kepts as a redirect to the disambiguation page Niner rather than to any one fan's preferred meaning.  The Star Trek redirect has been moved to Niners (Star Trek). - Fayenatic (talk) 06:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shield of Heracles

message: The article currently says:
:The poem takes its cue from the extended description of the shield of Achilles in Iliad xviii, from which it borrows directly:
Then proceeds with two translations. I just wanted to point out that in the original Greek texts there is only one word different between the two quotes. Using (separate) published translations, while in many respects desirable, obscures this. Perhaps we should replace them with our own translations. --Iustinus 06:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! (Montgomery Burns). That'd be you, Iustinus. You can crib the best, most accurate phrases from either of the two translations, with additional polish of your own. --Wetman 06:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the middle of a paper (which does involve the Shield of Heracles, mirabile dictu), but at some point when I feel like I have time to write a good translation, I'll go for it. If anyone wants to beat me to the punch, they should feel free. --Iustinus 07:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I moved manuscripts section from Hesiod to here, though the section has problems. McCronion (talk) 02:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  manuscripts
Talk:John Layman

message: Will keep an eye on this article... someone is trying to deface it for personal disputes.  Dumb.  Go somewhere else. --nathanbeach 13:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a place to air personal disputes
Talk:KOZN

message: Since KOZN has left ESPN radio, shouldn't the Disney template be removed from the bottom of the page?  75.200.134.124 (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney template deletion proposal
Talk:Aurum sulfide

message: Hey, hang on, this is real, a room mate of mine has some, and I even found a few hits on google.  Not notable in an of itself, but is a real product, and I gather sells.  I may have the wrong spelling, box is in Russian.
Footnote added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 06:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hollows (series)

message: This Hollows page gives away way too much information, especially the characters section.  There should be spoilers, or at least warnings, for those who find the page while in the process of reading the series so every single cliff hanger of every single book isn't given away by accident. (Section added June 16, 2008 by User:Powers4Good
:This is a difficult case. Basically, WP:Spoiler says now that WP does not contain spoilers, but on the corresponding talk page, you see the fight about that. My opinion is that an article shall show the important facts, especially if they are the plot surprise, and not tease. --Rolf b (talk) 10:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You, in turn, just spoiled this for me.  Thanks for that. 99.49.229.249 (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: SPOILERS NEEDED

message: Given that other lead characters of a series of novels often have their own entries, or at least a section of their own, shouldn't there be more information about Rachel Morgan herself?  If Richard Sharpe can have his own page, why not Rachel?(72.144.183.207 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rachel Morgan 

message: There was (and probably still is) a lot of references that are not clear enough, and can easily lead to mistakes. I tried to correct a few, specially the description of The Turn. If some other fans could help on this, I'm sure everyone would appreciate. morcego (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections and Cleanup 

message: The interwiki links were all very general for either science fiction or fantasy. They aren't appropriate for a specific series such as this. I have therefore deleted them. Aleta Sing 21:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki 

message: It would be helpful if someone could add publication dates, publishers, etc.  The chronologies are not as helpful if you don't know where to find the books and stories.
Also, a bit nitpicky, but I would really like to see some sort of citation for all of this summarizing - is it the author's?  A collaboration of fans?
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.157.125 (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information needed 

message: Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy works (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain.  This series would qualify.  Anyone care to add it? Tamtrible (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone familiar with this series care to add it to this list?
Talk:ARIA Music Awards of 2007

message: Why don't Small Mercies have a Wikipedia article?? -  PN57  13:56, 06:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Without a Trace episodes

message: Can I change this page into the one like List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation episodes?
: Done. --Mukk 05:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw the above notes and noticed that the list of episodes was no longer like the CSI lists. There are comments that episode descriptions are to be on the respective season pages but that is not how it was a week ago before i started modifying it. The season episode lists are now transclusions of the episode guides, like List of CSI: NY episodes, and the page is no longer 76KB. I have been and will continue to merge the episode descriptions to provide the most complete and concise descriptions of each episode where the two respective pages have variation. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 00:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing Format
Talk:List of AM radio stations in the United States by call sign (initial letters KA–KF)

message: At my last edit, Wikipedia reports this article is 103 kilobytes long — that's almost 4,000 lines and is waaay out of line with Wikipedia:Article size guidelines.  It exceeds the capability of the browser on my Windoze system, causing system crashes; the browser on Linux barely handles it.  The article should be broken down into roughly 1,000-line chunks.  I'm suggesting the following breakdown:
*Chunk 1: KA-- through KE--
*Chunk 2: KF-- through KK--
*Chunk 3: KL-- through KR--
*Chunk 4: KS-- through KZ--
That should result in four articles, each roughly 27 kilobytes in size.  That's still large, but should be manageable for most browsers' editors.—QuicksilverT @ 04:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article too big
Talk:Chick House

message: k;l,dmsnabhnDZHbjkdfnmjdnfdndd n d  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.129.127 (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sultanate of Deli

message: This article needs work to (a.) clarify when it became a sultanate and (b.) fix the chronology.  I invented it from cut & pastes, so it's still quite weak.  It's better than nothing (a lot was pointing here), but it needs help.  --Smilo Don 14:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up needed 

message: There's a lot of confusion between Aru and Deli out there. Ricklefs says they're separate, so that's good enough for now. --Smilo Don 18:52, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aru = Deli?  

message: We have a lot of things that could combine here.  Deli River. Deli railways.  Tanah Deli.  The Sultanate of Deli.  Deli Serdang Regency.  The Dutch introduced tobacco here... There's the intro. of Islam here... conquests... Important area for far-flung trade.  Anyway, this article would probably be better as just Deli, with geography, history, economy, etc. Would require a DAB with delicatessen.  --Smilo Don 14:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move and reconceptualize?