lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States House Science Subcommittee on Technology

message: This subcommittee is now "United States House Science Subcommittee on Research and Technology" -  see . Can the title be changed to reflect that? Though if Congress can't keep things straight (their link refers to an old title of the subcommittee) what chance do the rest of us have? Steve Holden (talk) 10:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold!  You can go ahead and move it yourself, no need to ask permission.  Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Should be Retitled
Talk:V. M. Girija

message: Pranayan Oralbum? what does that mean? Roopesh pen 10:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:Jean d'Estrées

message: This article was translated from :fr:Jean d'Estrées on 1 Nov 2006 by --Theloniouszen 00:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vachanamrut

message: I removed a lot of unsourced Original research, and requested citations for many others. Unsourced content and personal conclusions do not belong in an encyclopedia. Please discuss here any changes before making them/reverting. Sfacets 12:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article needs to be changed to use more neutral language. Statements like "In fact every statement of the Master is packed with and based on His in-depth religious knowledge, spiritual insights and practical experience" belong in a pamphlet, not in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia needs to sound neutral, not like a follower of the religion in question. --SJK (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: "Swaminarayan mandirs" redirects to the article 'Bhagwan Swaminarayan', "mandirs" directs the reader to the article 'mandirs' which explains what they are. I believe the second is more useful.--Editor2020 (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swaminarayan mandirs wikilink 

message: After reviewing the current article, I believe it needs significant improvements. I agree with the tag indicating the article is confusing and hard to understand and the article lacks reliable secondary sources. Additionally, it does not comprehensively describe the Vachanamrut and its role in the diocese. I will begin researching and re-writing the article and will update my sandbox with my revisions and edits. I look forward to working on improving this article. Apollo1203 (talk) 06:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvements 

message: I came across this book - https://www.google.com/books/edition/Vachanamrut_in_English/e_LgDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 while researching mahattattva and have been reading this on google books - I want to cite this book and page numbers for some content I want to add on Mahattattva page, but seems it doesn't have page numbers. Do anyone know if this book has any editions with page numbers? Asteramellus (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I found this another english translation seems from the original source (https://www.swaminarayan.wales/images/Scriptures/vachnamrut/vachnamrut-english.pdf). Maybe I can use this - but it doesn't seem to be a published book with isbn? Asteramellus (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  pdf with page numbers for this book
Talk:Vachanas

message: *Support:I think this is a no-brainer.  Please merge.  But merge Vachanas into Vachana, not the other way round.  ie., I feel the article should be called 'Vachana' and not 'Vachanas'.  Vachanas is just plural of Vachana.  Sarvagnya 06:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: hmm... I am under the impression that Vachana is the literary form.  In Kannada also its referred to as Vachana  sahitya.  Vachanas or VachanagaLu, I feel is just plural form.  Infact, 'Vachana literature' or 'Vachana Sahitya' may also be better choices than just 'Vachana' or 'Vachanas' for the article title.  In any case, I think we can go ahead and merge the articles and think about the title later.  The article can always be moved later.  Sarvagnya 23:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Street unicycling

message: The page discusses a "sideways wheelwalk" (in the 270 Unispin trick), but never describes what a sideways wheelwalk is.  I can imagine what it involves, but since I've been on a unicycle for less than 30 minutes in my entire life, I'll let somebody who knows what they're talking about add in a description of the "sideways wheelwalk."--Nichenbach 00:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure a lot of the people who created these videos would love to see them on Wikipedia. If anyone needs help submitting video here, please let me know by clicking on my name, and then following the "email this user" link. --Gmaxwell 20:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Who is that? I am guessing that he's on the list of influential riders because he has "invented [a] common trick". Which one exactly? I've never heard of him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidCreswick (talk • contribs) 00:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victor Passos? 

message: The title of the article suggests that this would refer to unicycling on the street, however the contents refer to what I would think would be called freestyle unicycling or street freestyle unicycling. Perhaps this should be re-named or re-worked. StewFor2Dollars (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject/title discrepancy
Talk:Valari

message: Wiki Raja 10:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: Hi,
I am a boomerang sports enthusiast. Can the authors of this article provide reference to the specific section in Purananuru that discuss returning boomerang. To my knowledge, no civilization has independently reinvented the returning boomerang, this would therefore be a stunning revelation.
Thanks.
Prasad  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.80.217 (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamilian valari were two types: returning and non-returning to the thrower 

message: This article is written like a joke. Same phrase repeatedly used to glorify the term. ChandlerMinh (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joke
Talk:Sa'adu Abubakar

message: I think we should move this to Saadu Abubakar or Saad Abubakar. Is "Sada" something he uses, or was this just a typo on the BBC site that is being propagated? I'll investigate.
----iFaqeer 00:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it to Sa’adu Abubakar; this seems to be what he uses. Picaroon 21:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Though the BBC gives 1953 as his year of birth, the Daily Independent (Lagos) seems to know better: it gives his date of birth as August 24, 1956 (Sultan Abubakar’s Visit To Abeokuta, February 28, 2007).--Ankimai 10:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should go with what the Independent says. In addition, this page says he is 53 years old; maybe the BBC just got confused. Picaroon 21:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: I would like to remove and/or change the following:
: becoming the heir of the title since the son and the grandson of his brother also died in the accident
because the succession to the office is not a European-style inheritance by the eldest son. The process of picking the new Sultan is/should be mentioned in the articles referenced. Besides, to even think that a man of Sultan Maccido's stature would have only one son is rather humorous, even if one did not know the specific facts.
--iFaqeer (talk) 21:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession
Talk:Three Mills

message: Merged the two articles: Three_Mills and Three_Mills_Island Gordo 10:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was very little material on Three Mills Island so I have created a REDIRECT Gordo 10:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Mills Island 

message: Aren't those two photos showing pretty much the same thing?2.31.101.233 (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Sokoto Grand Vizier

message: Been editing Sokoto pages for a month and I would be highly surprised if this article ever has enough information to move it from a stub.  Aside from two mentions in 1900 travelogues by Europeans, with little content, there are no books in Google Books or other search or with Wazirin as search term that even discuss this issue.  AbstractIllusions (talk) 19:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Deletion proposal was taken down and through discussion decided not to delete.  AbstractIllusions (talk) 21:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for deletion 

message: According to sources in the article Sambo Junaidu was the 13th and his older brother Usman Junaidu the 12th, which doesn't match the number of people mentioned in the article.
There may be some problems with the names too as they don't match https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-the-vizier-of-sokoto-1279763.html. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy
Talk:Richland High School (Texas)

message: The content of this section was taken out of the Background section to segregate them from the other "academic" achievements presented.
These were both present up until 2012, when the 1999 shooting was removed for it's citation link breaking, as the source referred to the Centers for Disease Control taking on the responsibility of gun violence in schools from that point on. However, the content was restored in 2018 and updated with the archived citations for that incident.
Kiodane (talk) 18:10, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Shootings

message: It appears as though many schools in the southern United States have a long history of racism.  It is good to see that many students have found a way to speak out against racist administrators.  In this way, Wikipedia can serve as more than just an encyclopedia, but also as a forum for oppressed peoples everywhere. --Martian.knight 03:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finally someone speaks out!

message: Sheesh I don't pay attention for six months and the article goes crazy.  I just took out one last line, comparing the current school flag to the confederate battle flag.  They look nothing alike, or at least no more alike than flags containing red, white, and blue colors and stars can.  (The Texas and U.S. flags and the British Union Jack look more like the confederate battle flag than the current Richland flag does.)
Richland's mascot has certainly stirred controversy.  I moved to the area just before high school, and I hated the symbols and their connotations.  Eventually I realized that, for the majority of students, they were symbols of their school and not of various repugnant alternatives.  Despite that, I readily agree that it was time to replace those symbols and move on.
The box on the right is still woefully incomplete.  Compare the material presented to that of other high schools in Texas or around the country.  When I added that material I just put in what I knew; someone who still lives in the area and is more familiar with the school should fill in the rest per the standard template.
N Norder 16:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In retrospect I think the flag and mascot could have been "flaming pile of dog poo" and most students would have fought to keep it and chanted enthusiastically at games. For me at least it was the school flag and had nothing to do with the historical ideas behind the symbol. But even then I knew the big truckers with confederate flags on their grills weren't all spirited RHS alumni. 71.170.97.73 (talk) 02:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still Incomplete But At Least Neutral Again
Talk:Weinstein conjecture

message: Is this still a stub? I can't ever tell... Orthografer 00:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Dumb question: Is the third paragraph (which states that the existence of open books implies that any contact form is isotopic to one carrying a Reeb orbit) specific to dimension 3?  Or do higher-dimensional contact manifolds also admit (analogues of) open books? 28 January 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.99.209 (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are open books in higher odd dimensions. There's a little info in the open book article. I would be interested to know whether the analogous notion of Giroux correspondence holds in higher dimensions. For example, I know not every smooth odd-dimensional manifold has a contact structure, and I don't think there's a general existence result for open books in odd dimensions either. Orthografer (talk) 03:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Higher dimensional open books

message: I cannot find any definition of the article's subject in the article.
If there is one thing the article ought to include, it is a statement of what the Weinstein conjecture is.
Can someone knowledgeable about the Weinstein conjecture please include one or more declarative sentences in the article which unequivocally define what it is? Thanks.
The article does include the following opening paragraph:
"In mathematics, the Weinstein conjecture refers to a general existence problem for periodic orbits of Hamiltonian or Reeb vector flows. More specifically, the current understanding is that a regular compact contact type level set of a Hamiltonian on a symplectic manifold should carry at least one periodic orbit of the Hamiltonian flow. The conjecture is stated for any Hamiltonian on any 2n-dimensional symplectic manifold."
But saying what the conjecture "refers to" or what "the current understanding is" -- is quite different from stating the conjecture.Daqu (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article omits any definition of the Weinstein conjecture
Talk:Deductive closure

message: I'd like to get a better definition of closure but don't have any mathematics dictionaries. The MathWorld definition is a bit better, but I'd rather not cite too many online resources. Could someone offer one? Simões (talk/contribs) 18:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of closure 

message: Uh-oh. Someone stole the term! See New York Times article.72.25.88.69 (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Usage of the term "Epistemic Closure"
Talk:Vikramuurvashiiya

message: Please merge this article with Vikramōrvaśīyam both are exactly same —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kapiljadhav (talk • contribs) 15:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge this article 

message: Please merge this article with Vikramōrvaśīyam both are exactly same
– — … ° ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · § Kapiljadhav: Kapiljadhav 15:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge this article
Talk:Niyogi Committee Report on Christian Missionary Activities

message: Could someone take the trouble to format this mess before splatting it onto the article?
Thanks. rudra (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-Paste Dump Of Book ToC
Talk:Vinod Kumar Shukla

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Writer is established one. I have added two references for their two books.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angpradesh (talk • contribs) 18:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References have been added
Talk:Vyākaraṇa

message: Just thinking aloud.  The merge proposal on Aindra school of grammar got me thinking.  There are few problems with calling this article "Vyakarana".  Vyakarana simply just translates to grammar and it is a tatsama in several languages other than Sanskrit.  For example Kannada grammar is also called vyakarana.  But the article about Kannada grammar(its still part of Kannada language I think) isnt called "vyakarana".  
So, I was first tempted to just move this article to "Sanskrit grammar".  But then Sanskrit grammar already exists.  Also the scope of this article seems to be different from "Sanskrit grammar".  Is Schools of Sanskrit grammar a better choice, then?  Evidently, this article is not just about "Schools of Skt., grammar", though I feel it can be rewritten and moulded to fit such a title.  Or can we cleanup Sanskrit grammar and make room for some of the contents from here.  And the rest of the contents, we try to find place for somewhere else?  Please add you thoughts.  Sarvagnya 19:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title, merge, move, redirect?? 

message: ...does Bhartrihari, the Sanskrit Grammarian's, page redirect here? Alinovic (talk) 13:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why??!

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Daśāvatāra which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Downtown Science (Blockhead album)

message: :Image:600486.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:600486.jpg
Talk:Regulamentul Organic

message: Removed information based on source.
In the Moldovan regulations article 421 stipulated: “The course of all teachings will be in the Moldovan language, not only for the facilitation of the sholerars and the cultivation of the language and the homeland, but also for the word that all public causes must be traced in this language, which the varnishers use in church holidays.” (source). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: To relate that part with the modern Moldovan language is WP:OR. Please provide sources that establish a continuity between the Moldavian language mentioned there and the Moldovan language that appeared on 1924. It is worth noting that Moldavian was historically used for an alternate name of Romanian in the Principality of Moldavia. This is stated in the article of the Moldovan language. Super Ψ Dro 19:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Also don't pick the diff that suits you the most. Another user provided a reliable source about the part of the text that I removed and I left it there. Super Ψ Dro 19:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing information 

message: Last section barely sourced + one unsourced disputed map (:File:Rom1793-1812.png). A455bcd9 (talk) 07:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Victor Humpherson

message: For some reason both Cricinfo and CricketArchive list Humpherson's birthplace as "Bewdley on Severn". I live in Bewdley, and it's practically never known (or been known) as that, so I've simply put "Bewdley". Loganberry (Talk) 01:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:Chicano nationalism

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 
Talk:National Academic Games Project

message: "The National Academic Games Project is the oldest continuously running program involving the Academic Games competitions in the nation." Can we find out which nation? Also, as the article stands, it's a strong candidate for being merged into the Academic Games article. Is there enough more information available to merit keeping this as its own article? Kathy A. 01:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

message: No reference links.
Purely 1st person anecdotal.
I was a participant at Nova in '68 &'69.
Dayton HS in the Armstrong School District in western PA won WFF 'N Proof in '68.
There was a commendation resolution passed in the PA legislature congratulating us.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owsleyskid (talk • contribs) 04:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Participant 1st person?
Talk:Soninke language

message: I added a couple of sentences from the Soninke page that seemed to belong here. Also an external link and the Languages of Senegal category.--A12n 01:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it a tonal language?  The article should mention this.  Badagnani 07:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tonal?

message: new link
http://www.asawan.org/fr/lexique_soninke  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.189.163.53 (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to lexicon 

message: woman 86.0.224.107 (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  soninke
Talk:Gugh

message: According to this article, Gugh is uninhabited. But according to the article Scilly Islands, it has three citizens. Which of the two articles is correct? Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 01:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Holy Cross Catholic Academy

message: I added this to the page for several reasons:
1. The page makes no reference to where the school is - the Woodbridge link leads to a disambiguation page.
2. Given that Holy Cross is a very popular name for Roman Catholic schools, the article should perhaps be renmaed to include it's location, with a link to a disambiguation page at the top of the article.
3. What age range does this school cater for? The system of grades refered to is not universal.
As a final though, what about some categories? Thanks Caledonian Place 01:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing tag

message: Describe the programs it offers which makes it unique. Also try to describe the facilities in better detail. Include some of it's past activities in the community and special events which it has held. I use to go there but it was a while back and I know some things have changed. Also I put the staff members in chart form for better readability. I also did spell checks and fixed grammar and punctuation.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tarazed (talk • contribs) 01:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Expand on This Article
Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago

message: "References: Peters, Edwina. A Chronology of Archival Development in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Archives 10 (1993): 23-32." 
I'm worried that there may be copyvio issues here. Google didn't turn up anything. I don't have access to this book through my local library, so I can't proceed further on this. Kathy A. 01:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was no response. Will send the article to AfD. --B. Wolterding 13:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review
Talk:Allan Carr

message: Olivia Newton-John was famous long before she ever heard of Carr. Also she was never his client. This article is a mess and was definitely written by one of Carr's agents. It reads like a bio he put out
99.149.192.101 (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

message: The entire section on the Academy Awards has no citation. It also contains opinions, which do not belong. There must be a credible source for the information, or the section should go.Chagallophile (talk) 22:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy Awards