lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chō

message: Whether or not Anime News Network has taken note of this (I have told them about it, though), the Japanese wiki claims so and has already moved the Nagashima (:ja:長島雄一) page to Chou (seiyuu) (:ja:チョー (声優)). The Dutch page also says so (:nl:Yuichi Nagashima). Unofrtunately, Cho's profile on Haikyo's site doesn't mention anything about him being Nagashima, but he is listed as palying Jaken in the InuYasha movies. IMDB also credits Nagashima with dubbing Elmer Fudd and Gollum in Lord of the Rings, both of which the Japanese wiki credits to Cho: here. Here's a Japanese fan site (I assume) that lists a lot of Nagashima's roles, and a lot of which are also listed on Cho's wiki page, including minor roles from early in his career: here. That's all I have, sorry it's nothing more reliable. Seigi Choujin 20:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't buy that the  move was appropriate. Gene Nygaard (talk) 03:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nagashima=Chou

message: It seems that some of the game roles with no anime version (such as Mana Khemia) has been mixed in it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.187.65 (talk) 09:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roles in anime 
Talk:Junko Iwao

message: Does anyone really need to know her blood type? This section should be removed. Jonneroo (talk) 00:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Blood types in Japanese culture 208.245.87.2 (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed anyway, as the stuff are not very relevant to understanding her. --an odd name 07:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section
Talk:Miyuki Sawashiro

message: Why was my Edit undone? that My Little Pony is no Anime, it is just an Anime-influenced Series, also its origin is not Japan, but the US so it is a dubbing Role, where it is properly listed, so why was my Little Pony added again to Anime???
My1xT(a.k.a. My1 (insecure)) 11:52, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 552789197 

message: Per MOS:BLPLEAD: "The lead sentence should describe the person as he or she is commonly described in reliable sources. The notable position(s) or role(s) the person held should usually be stated in the opening paragraph. However, avoid overloading the lead paragraph with various sundry roles; instead, emphasize what made the person notable. Incidental and non-notable roles (i.e. activities that are not integral to the person's notability) should usually not be mentioned in the lead paragraph. In her Filmography, practically all her activities involve being a voice actress, not a regular actress, so this is the only occupation that should be listed in the infobox and lead.  Her role in the live-action Death Note was a voice role. You could add singer for her recorded singles, but at this point, there is nothing that indicates she has a Wikipedia-notable career as a live-action actress. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice actor, not actor/voice actor 

message: First point: Is the lead section too long? There's a lot and lot of roles listed there. Should we cut them down or not? A lot of them are video game roles, not Anime, despite the section saying "a number of Japanese anime."
Second point: There's a user who hates Danganronpa (as past edit summaries spell out) and keeps removing her credit as Touko from the lead. It's OK to list that credit, right? I know it's a video game, but Sawashiro voiced Touko in the anime versions as well.Crboyer (talk) 17:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Section
Talk:Monkey Island (island)

message: Monkey Island is the most well-known location in the south Monkey Island series of adventure games and the games often involve Guybrush Threepwood, the main character, searching for Monkey Island or being stranded on the island and trying to escape.
What mess of a sentence... --euyyn 07:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix it :) Pictureuploader 10:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so confident of my own written English as I should :) --euyyn 18:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: :Continuity Error : At the beginning of CMI Monkey Island is quite clearly shown with its high view point and the Carnival built into the volcano on the RIGHT (this is where the fault lies). In SMI the volcano, dormant at this time, is shown to be on the LEFT of the Island, now this doesn't constitute a problem as viewed from the other side the volcano would be on the RIGHT, however this means that the "hook" at the top of the map in SMI would be clearly visible in the CMI opening shot and it is not, this then leads to believe that the island is viewed from the other side and there is a simple error of the Monkey Head and volcano being on opposite sides. HOWEVER this means that the beaches on this side of the Island (where Guybrush first lands in SMI and the beach on the stretch before the Monkey Head) would be visible on the opening shot of CMI which they also are not. This is a simple continuity error of the layout of the Island however it leaves an unsolved puzzle of how the island really is laid out. It is also said that the cannibal's were driven away by the carnival however they lived on a completely different part of the island only accessible by boat therefore it shouldn't have disturbed them, (unless tourists used a boat to get to the village which is most likely)
This is redundant and errorrous information. Firstly, the volcano is still dormant in CMI and, secondly, the opening shot, with the carnival located on the right-side, is clearly from the south-side of the island. Further more, there is no indication that the Carnival was built on the volcano. The lava-streams run all across the island underground as evidenced in SMI where you see the lava when you go down the Monkey Head. -TheHande 08:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph
Talk:Hague Securities Convention

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Frederick C. Sherman

message: Admiral Sherman stated on an episode of You Bet Your Life (air date: 01-04-1950) that he was a FULL ADMIRAL at retirement.
He also stated he had over 40 years of service when he retired.
Both of these facts are incorrect in this article and should be changed.  I think direct interview with the actual person trumps whatever made-up facts someone decided to put on the article page. WarFighter (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Tonicity

message: I thought tonicity referred to the solution with reference to the cell.  i.e. 7% sodium chloride solution would be a hypertonic solution with respect to almost all living cells. 81.179.75.219 07:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tonicity is a unitless comparison of the solute concentration of one solution to another.  Although it is often used to describe the solute concentration of extacellular fluid relative to the intracellular fluid, it need not be used this way.  Tonicity can be expressed between any solutions separated by a semi-permeable membrane.  I hope that this clears things up for you Slevit1 (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: What, exactly, do you think is contradictory? Slevit1 (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Defintion Comment

message: I want to add information, but I'm not quite sure as to how to make it fit with the rest of the article.  Basically, this entire article refers to tonicity between a cell and its external environment.  However, tonicity does not have to relate to a cell.  For example, a hypertonic solution is simply one with a greater impermeable solute concentration than the solution to which it is being compared.  You can separate any two fluids with a semi-permeable membrane and have one be hyper/hypo/isotonic to the other.  This is often used in reference to a cell, but does not need to be.  Any ideas on how to incorporate this? Slevit1 (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How should this be incorporated? 

message: Why on earth 2 separate sections, one headed "Isotonic Solution" and the other "Isotonicity"?? Cgingold (talk) 21:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isotonic 

message: The article reads
:In some cases of suspensions intended for intramuscular injection, a slightly hypotonic solution is preferred in order to increase the dissolution and absorption of the drug by absorbing water from the surrounding tissues.
Did the author mean to say hypertonic? Or hypotonic because the water solution absorbs into the tissue? -Arm (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tonicity and intermuscular injections. 

message: I think this article mixes up solutions and cells to the point where it isn't understandable for a casual reader. I think it needs a rewrite.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yer maw (talk • contribs) 15:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is hard to understand 

message: This is obviously incorrect and quite misleading. 95.204.194.187 (talk) 13:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypertonicity (physiological, as in the opposite of hypotonicity) redirects to this article
Talk:List of Strange Days at Blake Holsey High episodes

message: A few things I noticed here, but don't want to change myself in case I'm wrong somehow:
* "Invisible" and "Magnet" are back to back descriptions of the characters having fun in the early stages of the weirdness-of-the-week. Can maybe something different be said about Josie instead (e.g. about her run-in with Madison) so that it's less repetitive?
* "Culture" mentions the Josie clone's later return, which unless I missed somthing in reruns doesn't happen in this episode. How about describing her Janitor-assisted departure instead, not to mention some hint of the Josie and her mother plotline? Also, the term "Josie 2" in later episode descriptions is never explained here to be a reference to the clone.
* "Pheromones" - Student Councils? Plural?
* "Brainwaves" describes the characters switching "mental state."  That makes it sound like switching emotions, degree of wakefulness, or something non-crucial like that. How about "personalities" or somesuch?
* "Hologram" says, "They discover a hologram of Sarah Lynch, asking for a pendant from Vaughn." (I changed it from "wishing" to "asking.") Wouldn't it be better to add, "as proof he got her message"? "Josie is reluctant on whether or not the hologram was really sent by Vaughn's mother."  How about, "is dubious about" instead?
* "Past" - I thought the gravity sensor was used to predict, not program, and the actual openings in this episode are caused by Victor's latest experiments.  Am I mistaken?
* Overall - the titles are not consistent in emphasis - some look bold, others not. Why is this?  It's not because of the Wikilinks.
I suppose I should just have gone ahead and made some of these changes, but as I say, I'm not sure I'm right about all of them, based on just watching most of the eps several times each.  What do you think?
:Look at that.  I totally failed to sign these comments when I made them, probably weeks ago. The trouble with the Strange Days articles in general, I think, is that there is a lot of work to be done. I'm willing to help, but I think it going to take several experienced writer-editors to get it all. Karen | Talk | contribs 04:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Imagewatermark

message: Is anyone opposed to a change in the wording of this image to include images that contain credits? I associate "digital watermarking" with credits that overlap the main subject of the image itself, as in :Image:Visible digital watermarking.jpg. But I've been applying this tag to all images that contain credits, even if the credits are discreetly given in a corner of the image, since credits in images violate the Wikipedia image use policy (at least for images that are created by Wikipedia users). If there's no opposition, I'll make such a change in a few weeks. —Bkell (talk) 08:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it, I say. No sense in making another template for something only tangentially different. (While you're at it, I wonder if this template shouldn't be derived from the code of one of the other image cleanup templates; I based it on the rather more generic .) –Unint 19:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits in image 

message: This template states that images with embedded credits are in violation of the image use policy if user-made. However, the image use policy says nothing of the kind. Either the policy needs to be changed or (more likely) the template is in error. 192.91.147.35 (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the policy page has been restructured, and the link in this template no longer pointed to the correct section. Thank you for noticing this; I've corrected the link. Please see WP:WATERMARK, which states, "Free images should not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits in the image itself or anything else that would hamper their free use…". —Bkell (talk) 23:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous or misleading 

message: Do timestamps in the image count as watermarks for the purposes of this template? Or is there a different template that should be used instead for cameras that automatically timestamp their images? Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 22:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timestamps
Talk:Hey, Hey, What Can I Do

message: This isn't the first time to see this but the BC with JP album didn't add a mandolin part to HHWCID. A mandonlin is in the original and it's really quite prominent. Don't know where this comes from.JE1977 08:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandolin 

message: I'm pretty sure this song is about a prostitute, hence "Street Corner Girl" and the line about a Midnight Shift. XAlpha 12:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's "BALL all day", i.e. make love.Vonbontee (talk) 12:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Part of the cleverness of this song is that "Wanna bawl all day" can refer to the singers sadness or the phrase "wanna ball all day" can refer to her, thus the homophone has 2 meanings. The same applies to "I got a woman, stay drunk all the time" could mean either that the woman stays drunk all the time OR due to his situation he stays drunk all the time. WesUGAdawg (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, my first question is to Vonbontee: how do you know that's what he's saying? Secondly, since it can either be Ball or Bawl, as WesUGAdawg pointed out, shouldn't that be what it says in the article? right now it says it's about a girl who wants to ball all day. Personally, I never heard it that way, nor have I heard any evidence that is what actually is being said. Tomjoad187 (talk) 20:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prostitute 

message: 1990 is clearly not the first time this was released.  The date should be 1970 - when it first saw official release as a B-side. 98.210.111.142 (talk) 06:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: The reference to staying drunk all the time is he man, not the woman.  His dismay causes him this malady.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.216.89.167 (talk) 02:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stay drunk all the time 

message: Hi there. I don't really see why a piece of acoustic rock music is always associated with celtic/folk rock. Are Mando Diao also Celtic Rock when they release an MTV Unplugged record? 
To me, Celtic Rock is music which has its roots in Celtic or Celtic-like musik, such as "The Battle of Evermore" or Runrig. Most of the "Led Zeppelin III" stuff however is clearly based on blues - there's even more Country&Western in it than Celtic music. And I don't think that the Afroamerican blues is so much related to Irish folk music.
Anyway ... I deleted this "Celtic Rock" tag. "Folk Rock" is ok.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.232.60.199 (talk) 14:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celtic rock/Folk rock
Talk:Alexander Hrennikoff

message: Folks, JFYI, his name is  (from , horse-radish, Cochlearia armoracia) which is (phonetically) transiterated as "Khrennikov"... Well, the "off-for-ov" replacement is quite common. --jno 08:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if this statement "Works of Alexander Hrennikoff are often considered as an inspiration for the late Stephen Timoshenko who further advanced the applied methods of structural analysis" can be verified, because, IMHO, S. Timoshenko precedes A. Hrennikoff in terms of age, schooling as well as of publications. TVBZ28 04:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My mixup, it is dangerous to do some bug fixing in a FEM code for my employer and research for wikipedia at the same time. I was trying to figure out, when Hrennikoff emigrated. Search on Hrennikoff and emigrated gives, In 1922 he emigrated to the US, first working at the Westinghouse ... influenced by Hrennikoff and McHenry “framework analogy” of the 1940s [20,21].. By brief looking inside one will find that the he is Timoshenko. Of course influenced by Hrennikoff is unrelated to Timoshenko. I am sorry. Still do not know when Timoshenko emigrated.abakharev 06:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cyrillic 'X'
Talk:East London Transit

message: In what way does East London Transit fulfill the criteria for Bus Rapid Transit as outlined in that article? 92.6.228.127 (talk) 03:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Bus rapid transit creep]]" 

message: While the bus routes are still in existence I cannot find information on 'East London Transit' as such - what there is seems to be all based on this WB article. Can someone develop? Jackiespeel (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of the article
Talk:Thames Gateway Bridge

message: This article reads like it was written by TfL themselves! Needs far more neutral description of the project, including the latest update that the Government decided TfL's projections were flawed and ordered a new inquiry, and that the Inspectors recommended refusdal for the project. That doesn't sound like the actions of a few whinging residents to me. Grunners 10:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the neutrality issue has now been addressed but is the article now however too skewed to the inquiry and the outcome? Would it be appropriate to add more information in relation to the design of the bridge and the perceived benefits? Who designed it? when? What alternatives were considered? what about Boris's cable car idea? PeterIto (talk) 09:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Thai greeting

message: In the current version of the origin, it states the purpose of the wai was to show that one was unarmed.  Might the wai come from the Indian namaste?  The gesture is similar, and I know Indian culture greatly influenced Thailand in many other ways.  Showeropera (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: Can we include how this word is written in Thai?  Widsith 08:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sawasdee is the name of the on-board magazine of Thai Airways. It is a wrong transcription of สวัสดี! The "ส" at the beginning of a syllable is pronounced as "s", but at the end of a syllable as "t". This is common with many letters of the Thai alphabet. If this aspect of the Thai Alphabet is not used for transcribing, then the spelling should be "swasdee", because no "a" is written between the "s" and the "w" at the beginning of the word. So I think that RTGS should be used (see: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Thailand-related articles), and sawatdi be made the spelling of the word in the article. Also should be mentioned that sawatdi is almost always followed by "kha" if spoken by a female and by "khrap" if spoken by a male. --FredTC (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Script

message: The gesture is used for much more than just a greeting. It is used to worship, pay respects, offer prayers, etc. The word "sawatdee" (this appears to be the most common spelling in general English sources) itself has a distinct history of its own, and warrants separate discussion. This article should be split into Wai (gesture) (I still think this is the best title, despite the above poorly attended move request), covering the gesture and its uses in Thai culture, and Sawatdee, covering the word, its history, uses, etc. The other cultures section should be moved into a worldwide overview article, probably Anjali mudra, which could also be split from the Namaste article (though let's save this for a later discussion). --Paul_012 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I spent a year living in a town in northeast Thailand, and used the wai everyday. This article is excellent as is and splitting it would only confuse. I believe everyone here should get used the gesture instead of the new ridiculous bumping, grinding, dancing routines. It looks like something out of "Saturday Night Live." I am using the gesture and receive  smiles of acknowledgment and a smile. I see it on occasion of government officials in newscasts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishpappy (talk • contribs) 13:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't quite follow why "splitting it would only confuse." Care to elaborate? --Paul_012 (talk) 18:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Create Sawatdee in draft space (I understand the historical significance) and see if it stands alone. If not, split can't be justified.Johncdraper (talk) 11:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split suggestion
Talk:Bexley

message: I'm not at all sure why kbthompson removed my contribution about local schools & churches.  I thought they were a useful addition.  It would have been nice if he had given his reasons.Andy1971 14:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's kept some of the information in, but there's no need to list restaraunts, Wikipedia isn't a yellow pages heh.--Tiresais 19:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cranford, London

message: Can a date be added - rather than 'is due to be...' - given the details on :  would be a suitable link. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rectory Park
Talk:Ten Crimes of Qin

message: I fully agree  that the article as it stands isn't what I think we're going for (was about to speedy it myself), but I was looking into this a bit, and it actually seems to be a real subject that I'd like to see us expand on. Looking at the page for Qin Shi Huang, we see this article's subject mentioned as a historic text. Maybe it's better to delete as is and rewrite later, I'll leave that up to whoever. Also, I've never actually contested a speedy before, so I hooope this is the right path to do so. Thanks for your time. Luna Santin 09:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have copied in the relevant text from that article to serve as a stub for this one. GeorgeStepanek\talk 09:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, heh, can't believe I didn't think of that. Pleasure working with you. :D Luna Santin 09:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: hi 173.9.56.113 (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Speedy