lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Allen Hatcher

message: I suppose that some questions along the following lines would be in order : 
1) Where is it possible to get hold of Allen Hatchers PhD thesis (it's always nice to see such work and compare it to the theses of other mathematicians).  
2) Are there any nice visualisations of his work?  Has he gotten anyone to make computationa movies of what it is that makes some of the topological concepts within his work tick?  
3) Beyond mathematics, what are his cultural contributions (yes, I know I ask for too much - but it's always nice to meet someone who's a renaissance mathematician, does he have a bit of a Che Guevara flair?  Any history of being a political dissident?  You don't hear about Galois type revolutionary mathematicians much nowadays - which is kinda a pity...). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nukemason (talk • contribs) 00:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Curious, whomever wrote the "interesting questions" did not sign.  Nor is there a record of this happening in the history tab.  Nor are these comments really relevant to the article.  Anyone mind if I just erase them?  Rybu (talk) 07:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting questions
Talk:Akira Mutō

message: It is much easier for further historical researches and/or classifications that all (military officers ofc) Japanese war criminals' pages will keep the same article descriptions (re: officer). Hanafunda (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  officer instead of ....
Talk:USS Roosevelt (DDG-80)

message: DDG-80 has been retrofitted with the 127mm/L62 Mk. 45 Mod 4 gun - the updated weapon mount is visible in the page photo, and has been confirmed by observation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.169.157.59 (talk) 22:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: (I realize this is an old post, but) Typically, content should be supported by reliable sourcing, and it's not often that seeing something in a photo qualifies. That said, it appears the article does have the requested update. - wolf 08:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2012
Talk:Medial magma

message: I just finished a major edit of this page. I reintroduced the magma terminology (because "medial algebra" isn't used in practice), added examples, and made various other improvements. An earlier discussion about the cartesian square of the operation was confusing, because that is not an endomorphism, it's a homomorphism. I hope the present discussion is clearer. 
What I'd still like to add is a section describing the Toyoda-Bruck theorem (it characterizes medial quasigroups in terms of abelian groups) and some remarks about the mode/modal terminology of Romanowska and Smith. I'm not sure when I'll have time to do this, though. --Michael Kinyon 00:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2006

message: Honestly I'm miffed why a number of papers attribute the result to Bruck (as well) because Bruck's paper says "First it is shown that every abelian quasigroup is isotopic to an abelian group, unique in the sense of isomorphism (Theorem 11). This result is essentially Murdoch's." 86.127.138.234 (talk) 11:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruck 

message: I propose merging Category of medial magmas into Medial magma. This is in line with the example given by Group (mathematics). While there is also Group theory for a more advanced treatment, category-theoretic topics like homomorphisms and products are discussed on the elementary group theory page and there is no article on the category/variety of groups itself. On the other hand, both Ring (mathematics) and Category of rings exist. The latter article is a list of unsourced properties with little exposition, however, which leans in favor of merging/eliminating these "category of blahs" articles unless they can be better justified separately from "blahs" themselves.caterpillar_tree (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Group with operators

message: I don't understand the significance of the remark about a group with operators being a mapping from Omega to the set of group endomorphisms. Isn't Omega just a distinguished subset of endomorphisms in the first place so that the mapping is inclusion? Or is there a more general notion of group with operators which is being alluded to? --Michael Kinyon 00:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  To say you have an object in this functor category is to pick-out a group and to map functorially monoid elements (= hom-set of category M) to elements of hom-set Hom_Grp(G,G)=End_Grp(G).  So it takes e in M to id_G, and products to compositions.  OT1H, in my 1974 ed, Bourbaki (I, Sect.4.2) puts no constraint on \Omega whatsoever (it's just a set).   OTOH, a monoid must contain the identity and be closed under composition.  So the Bourbaki Omega cannot precisely be identified with the functor category's M. One must expand Omega to the smallest monoid containing it, or view the mapping as an inclusion. I've added some material to try to clarify, but this needs some work (and a citation/ref).  Purfideas (talk) 01:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found explicit use of the functor category definition in Mac Lane, so added the ref.  Purfideas (talk) 02:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

message: Does somebody know something related to the following structure:
 Let E be an R-module, A \subset 2^E, B\subset 2^R, and
 E(A,B) = { x\in E | \forall a\in A, \exists b\in B: b x \subset a }
(Note, x is an element, but a,b are subsets of E - sorry for the ascii-limited
notation; I wrote 2^E for the power set although I hate this notation.)
It seems like something in-between a stabilizer, radical of a ring, and the
von Neumann/Kolmogorov definition of bounded subsets in TVS / modules.
I think this should be considered somewhere, but could not find it anywhere.
— MFH:Talk 22:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  stabilizer-like structure 

message: I think it must be a typo to say "operates on the operator domain".  I cannot find this terminology in Bouraki (the one reference at the time of this writing).  Clearly scalar multipliation is an endomorphism of vector spaces (it's a diagonal matrix after all), and similarly for R-modules.  So this must mean R is operator domain for underlying Abelian group of M.  I'm going to clarify accordingly.  Please roll it back with a reference to this terminology if I'm wrong. Purfideas (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo in the ring example?
Talk:National Library of Mexico

message: The link to the website does not work - and a quick websearch does not yield an obvious alternative. Can anyone else find it? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Pusher 3

message: I have a poster image from this release but am unsure of how to upload it and credit it according to copyright law, etc. 
It's a whole new kettle of fish for this n00b spelling and grammer editor [this is my first page overhaul]... =|
If someone could help, the image is located here: http://www.scope.dk/images/movie_full/4035_poster_pusherIII.jpg
Thanks in advance.Shaybear 00:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Pusher

message: Seeing as how the title that comes up on screen for the film is Pusher 3, I think it should be moved over to that page.76.205.91.1 (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears the box cover has "III" instead of "3": here. Parsecboy (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, But the title that comes up on screen for the film says Pusher 3.76.205.93.119 (talk) 01:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than cut and pasting, which messes up the article history, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves instead. Doctor Sunshine (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 2008
Talk:Joe Thomas (offensive tackle)

message: Nice job taking care of this page after he was drafted, the pages for Russel, Johnson, and Quinn were (and still are, posting on draft day) disasters. Babrook 13:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice Job!

message: The page about Joe (singer) was recently moved from here to there, but a look at "what links here" for "Joe Thomas" shows over 50 links, and almost all seemed to be about the music industry. I wonder if Joe was better off here at "Joe Thomas"; he seems to be well known by his surname judging by the widespread linking. Otherwise, some tedious disambiguation work is in order. HollyAm 00:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Joe (singer)

message: I listed that he will be drafted in round 1 in his infobox. This isn't debatable and please don't change it. It's an absolute lock that he'll go in the first round. Where he goes shall be determined later.--MP123 04:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Although he probably will go first round (and in the top 5), it is not confirmed, nor has it happened yet. Circumstances could lead to him getting a later round pick- freak accident, in trouble with law, abducted by aliens. Doesn't matter how likely they will happen, just that there is a possibility he won't go first round. Same thing could be said about other articles. Brett Favre will probably be in the hall of fame, but adding a hall of fame tag to his info-box would be wrong, because it hasn't happened yet. Hope you can clarify what I'm saying.++aviper2k7++ 04:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NFL Draft
Talk:William Sykes (businessman)

message: I don't know enough about the subject to fix it, but here's some possible sources to use for at least some cursory details -- enough to rewrite this into a verified stub, at least. All of this was plopped in by one user, and this article is the first result on Google, which is a concern. It needs to be cited.
* Possible genealogy report, Ctrl+F for his name
* Historical entry that does little more than prove he existed
* A lot of the products are in this museum, here's a few sources
--JStalk 00:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible stub sources
Template talk:WikiProject Central Asia

message: fixed map as per discussion of outdatedness. Chris 01:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: The way I see it, it's not fair use at all in this template -- it is not used for encyclopedic purposes. Shouldn't we replace it with a map or something? :-P - ∅ (∅), 02:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like we've got a free image in there now. Jecowa 03:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Sharbat Gula.png|Sharbat Gula.png]] 

message: Chris 23:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just in case we need a fallback, so this doesn't get orphaned

message: I was bold and have the set the picture to 100px instead of 150px. Talk page templates should take as little a room as possible. I hope it's okay. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 06:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made the picture smaller
Talk:Rafael Maroto

message: *"Así, tras efectuar al intendente Díaz de Labandero peticiones de armamento y uniformes totalmente imposibles de cumplir…": I'm a bit thrown by this, especially efectuar, which seems an odd choice. I think all it is saying is, "Thus, after sending Intendant to Díaz de Labandero petitions for armaments and uniforms that were totally impossible [for the Intendant] to fulfill…" Does anyone read it differently? - Jmabel | Talk 06:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  But that doesn't make any sense. And I see nothing here about asking Díaz to "be equipped". Where are you seeing that? - Jmabel | Talk 02:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Good point. My own guess was that it refers to a general who makes war plans without any sort of contact with the actual battleground, as in the case of Haig. Regards, Asteriontalk 20:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unresolved phrases 

message: Not really sure whether it is a good idea to translate the title of the book Episodios nacionales, as National Incidents. I would personally go for National Episodes or even leave it untranslated.. Regards, --Asteriontalk 21:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pérez Galdós 

message: Most of the redlinks in this translated article are names of army officers. Several have articles on the Spanish Wikipedia; should those be translated? -Fsotrain09 00:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Redlinks 

message: Can we have a final round of copyedits to this article (preferably a native English speaker) and then decide if it is OK to move to the Rafael Maroto page? Regards, Asteriontalk 21:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I support moving this into regular article space now -- even though, as you noted, it still needs quite a bit of improvement.--Fagles 01:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jmabel, "on point" was my literal translation of a punto, done during a cleanup sweep. I do support moving this into regular article space; let it be picked over by a wider set of eyes there. -Fsotrain09 15:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ready to go? 
Talk:Boolean domain

message: This article was originally created by Jon Awbrey, but I have rewritten it completely. The term "Boolean domain" is legitimate: I have verified that it is used in this sense in computer science and in those parts of theoretical computer science that are essentially pure mathematics. The term "Boolean variable" is clearly legitimate in computer science.
The page protection can probably be removed now. --Hans Adler (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten 

message: Perhaps something should be added about the use of the blackboard bold B (\mathbb{B}, U+1D539 𝔹) notation sometimes used to refer to this set.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Makepeace (talk • contribs) 18:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  𝔹 Notation 

message: The generalisation section of this page states:
 - The Boolean domain is replaced by the unit interval [0,1]
 - NOT(x) is replaced with 1-x
 - AND(x,y) is replaced with xy
However consider the case where x = 0.5. Here, NOT(x) = 0.5, and AND(x,NOT(x)) = 0.25; this is clearly a contradiction, since x and NOT(x) is always false. 
It is most likely the case that the formulas only apply for independent events, however this is not mentioned on the page. It is noteworthy also, that the generalisation section also does not list any references, except other Wikipedia pages.  
Whole Oats (talk) 01:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The generalisation section appears to be wrong
Talk:The Jacket (Seinfeld)

message: Added trivia, the source being the DVD commentary of the episode. Thedoorhinge 01:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I've got the DVD box set released in Australia and "The Jacket" is shown as Episode 5 of Season 2.
When it is written as Episode 3 of Season 2 in the article, is that the orignal air date for the episode in the USA, or the order of its original air date?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryce bubbles (talk • contribs) 22:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld episode numbers
Talk:Haskell Curry

message: While I am not an expert on this topic and hence hesitate to edit it, I note that some information is contradictory with the MacTutor entry, which says that Curry found about Schönfinkel's work in the US, not Göttingen, and that Hilbert was only nominal adviser to his thesis, Bernays being the real supervisor. Would someone more familiar with the subject matter check this and make the appropriate corrections if any?
Lmgottschalk 7/30/2006
:Agreed. I have a citation and I'm in the process of editing the article. A B Carter (talk) 01:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not a true statement. For example, before I had my morning cup of joe, I created 3 different simple programming languages and named them after myself. Perhaps you mean notable languages? Even then, I would think the fact would be very difficult to prove. :) fintler (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: DBAD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.128.42 (talk) 07:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SAE Institute

message: Do we really need all that detail in the History? Are the purchases of equipment, or moving premises that important?
Iain 01:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: This article looks like an advertisement for SAE at the moment. The short criticism portion of this article has been removed, as have links to critical webpages. Why? Can User:Babasko please explain. - Iain 23:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: No response to previous discussion, User:Babasko seems to have only removed critical elements of the article and has made no other contributions to Wikipedia. Therefore I have made the edits I was asking about. Iain 20:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: Hi. It seems that Babasko and I disagree. I believe the criticism section to be fair and reasonable. If the criticism itself is unreasonable that does not mean it should not be part of the article. I believe that the criticism itself is reasonable. One of the references is from a business magazine.[]
I think that the brief mention that some people have critised SAE and why to be apropraite to this article. 
I can't see a resolution here, and other unregistered (not logged in) users are removing the criticism section. I am going to investigate having this article reivewed by some kind of third party.
Iain 00:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement on Criticism section 

message: i just removed the history bits with wrongful slanderous allegations and statements. 58.172.24.204 seems to be on a personal vendetta against Tom Misner and mis-uses wikipedia for it. 
and before the question arises.. yes, i work for SAE and yes, i believe to know very well who this disgruntled editor is. and no, i do not feel that those edited entries aim towards the neutrality of the SAE entry. They are pure slander and plainly untrue.
earlier the question came up, if we really need an SAE history on this page, as one can read it on all sae websites and in the brochures.. i´m totally fine with that. less work for me..
babasko 09:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Entries being vandalized
Talk:Raymond Carhart

message: I started this article after seeing the name on the List of people known as father or mother of something, and recognised the name from a portrait in the entrance hall of the school for deaf children attached to the teaching hospital where I do clinical sessions, in Cape Town, South Africa. The school is a symbol of the life work of a pioneeer in the management of deaf children in my country, and the association clearly indicates to me that Carhart was a person that WP should have something about. Unfortunately I could access only the one citation tonight, and am unable to assess the importance of Carhart's work from my limited expertise, but hopefully some "audiologically less educated challenged" wikipedians can fill in more. --Seejyb 01:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Carhart was born in Mexico. Thus he was in Mexico. He was either an American expatriate there, or he was a Mexican emigrant to the US. It looks like the former is more likely.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Raymond T. Carhart's parents, Raymond Albert Carhart and Edith Noble Carhart, were US-born missionaries who moved to Mexico City as part of their Christian missionary work.  Raymond T. was born and raised in Mexico City until he was a teenager.  At 16, he traveled to the U.S., first to the midwest and later to stay with family in Los Angeles.  I can't say for sure if either expatriate or emigrant applies to him.  But now that you have more context, feel free to adjust your description of him. My source: Raymond T. Carhart was my father's father 97.136.127.250 (talk) 06:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Dad? 2601:742:8200:740:F0C1:8F9F:11EE:6ADF (talk) 02:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expatriate in Mexico
Talk:1859 in sports

message: The reference is in bad format and the Note includes substance for a baseball page, but here it is for now. --P64 01:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Baseball

message: "third Harvard-Yale Regatta following 1852 and 1855." --to be followed by 1860.   The event became annual in 1864, according to "America's Oldest Intercollegiate Athletic Event" by Harvard SID.  We need a historian, probably no SID, to say whether the event may be called established or traditional by 1859, because the 1861-1863 gap should be excused.
I have added some and tweaked some Rowing entries in 1850s years and in pre-1850s sports, but that will be all for me. Over to you "Boat Race" and "Crew" fans. 
Ox-Cam, when did the Boat Race become practically annual?
All, does the equal number of Ox-Cam and Har-Y entries make balanced sport reporting?  --P64 01:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowing:
Category talk:Baseball articles needing attention

message: We're having a disagreement over whether to call him a World Series champion. He played for the White Sox in 2005, contributed to their championship season, and received a ring. Yet, because he was injured for the Series and not on the roster, some people feel he doesn't deserve to be called a champion. Most of the people on the talk page agree to call him a champ, but there's still a few dissenters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiHogan654 (talk • contribs) 10:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Frank Thomas (designated hitter)
Talk:Marvin Breckinridge Patterson

message: I added the documentary that Breckenridge created. --JECason (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media 

message: What this is supposed to mean?
"While a student at Vassar, she helped found the National Student Federation of America, which was to make her acquaintance with Edward R. Murrow."
Did the writer mean "where she made an acquaintance with..."? --Carlif 01:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Why is she called Marvin and not Mary? 65.248.13.32 (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvin?
Talk:Curse of Thorn

message: * The curse "is a constellation that could appear during Halloween." < explains itself though maybe something should be added to say that this either only exists in the Halloween series etc.
::Uhhh...Duh. --John R. Sellers 20:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Druidic Tribes? --John R. Sellers 20:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Explain. --John R. Sellers 20:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear 
Talk:Parallel harmony

message: Removed this part, dunno what it should say with weird Unicode boxes and Chinese/Japanese characters?
== 근원 == * DeLone 등등. 알루미늄 (Eds.) (1975년). " 스무째 세기 음악의 양상 ". Englewood 절벽, 뉴저지: 선취 홀. . 종류: 하모니 de: Parallele (Musik)
:It's Korean, but I don't know what it says either :-) --HappyCamper 22:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed: Korean

message: The above image was removed with edit summary saying the reason for remove had been explained before. Therefore I have re-added the image. Hyacinth (talk) 22:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the third time you play dumb with this subject. See Talk:Thirteenth#Missing images. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 04:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article isn't about thirteenth chords, nor does this image contain thirteenth chords. Hyacinth (talk) 05:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Read everything please, I was extensively referring to avoid notes and invalid voicings. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 06:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed image