Talk:Glossary of Nazi Germany

message: After this project i feel like I speak german.WHEELER 17:52, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Under the entry for "Drittes Reich", it is claimed that the book title from which the name is derived is "Das drittes Reich". This is not proper German. "Drittes Reich", "das dritte Reich", or even "ein drittes Reich" are grammatically acceptable. Adjective endings are perhaps the most difficult aspect of German for speakers of English. samwaltz 12:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar note

message: Currently, while entries here are quite properly wiki-linked to the appropriate articles,  we are doing the same with internal cross-references of the "see" and "see also" sort.  This isn't good glossary/indexing practice, "Iron Cross - see Eiserne Kreuz" should link to the glossary entry on this page for Eiserne Kreuz, not the article page.
This is easily accomplished by using the anchor tag, where by inserting the (nonprinting) text , one can then link to that line from anywhere else on the page with a normal pipe-link blahblah
For example, I've edited the entry Eiserne Kreuz to read*Eiserne Kreuz, Iron Cross - Originally a... (etc) and the entry Iron Cross to read *Iron Cross - see Eiserne Kreuz which created a working cross-reference link.
I invite all the editors who've been working on this page to take a moment to do one or two cross-references like this; if we all do, the job will be done in jig time. --Solicitr (talk) 15:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: good tip. thanks! Cramyourspam (talk) 06:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend: use of the <nowiki>{{anchor}}</nowiki> template for internal cross-references 

message: I'm curious if these two links are needed in the infobox:
*Nazi punk
*National Socialist black metal
They seem off-topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I will go ahead and remove. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be part of the infobox, which is not editable from this page. I've asked about this on the Nazism talk page. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related topics - punk, black metal 

message: This is not a "Nazi" term. It's a jewish term of victimization and has no place in a list of German words.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The apostolica (talk • contribs) 06:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: While this was not a term used by the Nazi regime, it was something that the Nazi regime implemented. So I believe it's appropriate to include it in this article. I made an adjustment with this edit to tie the two terms together. I hope this clarifies. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:20, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In case you did not know, the language you've used here and in the edit summaries is racist. Please reconsider making additional posts of this nature. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

text: Note: He has now been correctly blocked indefinitely. Kierzek (talk) 02:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing 

message: In reality the term Holocaust was already used for the massacres of Jews that ensued the coronation of Richard I of England in 1189 (see here and here). Nevertheless modern use restarted only after the end of WWII. What has been written under "Holocaust" I would prefer to read under "Endlösung", which in the meantime I started to clean up and readjust in view of this move. But now other ways of thinking seem to appear. Carlotm (talk) 07:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Other ways of thinking seem to appear" -- could you clarify? K.e.coffman (talk) 08:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that you prefer to stick to the "Holocaust" term. And that is fine to me, although not fully in line with the page's title, which is why I wrote that "I would prefer to ...".  Carlotm (talk) 10:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with the term Endlösung is that this expression was specifically applied towards Jews and not the other enemies of the Reich. Holocaust is a modern term (which is stated) and the glossary is not just about German words identified as being associated with the Nazis; there are additional terms related to Nazi Germany in here. Holocaust is widely employed these days and primarily connected with Nazi Germany which is why it should remain.--Obenritter (talk) 16:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made an adjustment to the intro words. Does this help clarify? K.e.coffman (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Obenritter, I share your point of view, in principle, because, in reality, many tools and ways of acting which the Germans devised for the annihilation of Jews were used profusely also against all the other groups of enemies so much so that the voice "Endlösung" is explained as "a Nazi euphemism for what later became known as the Holocaust"; and that is why I envisage an "Endlösung" voice with all the contents currently exposed in "Holocaust". Anyway I am fine also with the status quo. Carlotm (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries Carlotm. The changes made by K.e.coffman to the article's description make the categorical usage fit. The interloping user who made the original deletion behaved in a manner which suggested he had Neo-Nazi proclivities (and an accompanying agenda) and was less interested in academic exchange and encyclopedic integrity; hence the immediate revert edit from me and from the ever vigilant K.e.coffman. If you think the term Endlösung requires additional expansion in the glossary, go ahead and elucidate further. --Obenritter (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be kept in and you gentlemen have handled the situation well. The "interloper" editor is of the type who should be reverted straight-away. Kierzek (talk) 20:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . Herr  should be commended for following so quickly in providing an immediate solution, in that, he immediately adjusted the articles description.--Obenritter (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Holocaust / Final solution

message: An anonymous IP has glossed Resttschechei as "remnants of Czechia"; however, this gloss does not appear in either of the sources currently cited. The URL citation "http://www.jpress.nli.org.il/..." (a search engine result, not a source per se) contains only the term Czechia in isolation but does not gloss Resttschechei and therefore fails verification. The cited RFE/RL source contains the gloss "remnants of the Czech lands". Doremo (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Rest = remnants, Tschechei = Czechia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.98 (talk) 13:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The burden is on the one who wishes to make the change and thus far 62.168.13.98 has not showed convincing evidence it should be done, per RS sources to verify their position. Kierzek (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Resttschechei - The rest of Czechoslovakia. Hitler’s term for what remained of Czechoslovakia after the annexation of the Sudetenland in 1938.Robert Michael and Karin Doerr, Nazi-Deutsch/Nazi-German (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002), p. 348. This is the definition provided by perhaps the single most authoritative collection of Nazi terms.--Obenritter (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resttschechei: failed verification of gloss 

message: * Resttschechei - r. of Czechia
* Restpolen - r. of Poland, http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14334917.html
* Restslowakei - r. of Slowakia, http://www.zeit.de/1989/24/als-das-ioc-die-unschuld-verlor
* Restbelgien - r. of Belgium, https://books.google.cz/books?id=aHkKBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA57&lpg=PA57&dq=%22Restbelgien%22&source=bl&ots=2BBPD6DGjL&sig=FUcJSuDuk8zuOZ8GaRfnpJIUeUc&hl=cs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiporSbyvjNAhXGrxoKHfvjCBsQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=%22Restbelgien%22&f=false  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.98 (talk) 18:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More "nazi" terminology  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glossary of Nazi Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101218165741/http://www.museumofworldwarii.com/Images2005/02DeutschlandErwachelge.gif to http://www.museumofworldwarii.com/Images2005/02DeutschlandErwachelge.gif
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070429200821/http://www.ridm.qc.ca/film.f/l/languenementpasla.html to http://www.ridm.qc.ca/film.f/l/languenementpasla.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "and in Philip K. Dick's book[18] and its eponymous television adaptation, The Man in the High Castle.[19]" this reference is completely unnecessary, as it refers to post-war literature or 21st century film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:110F:1042:2B00:C0AB:9B18:B8E4:418B (talk) 22:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offtopic pop-culture references 

message: The Glossary contains mostly Nazi German words and phrases. 
*'Righteous Gentiles' is English and has been coined after the war. 'The secular award (discussed below)' - 'below'? Xx236 (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-war phrases 

message: https://www.dwds.de/wb/Nazibonze Xx236 (talk) 14:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazibonze 

message: 'Burschenschaft' remains unlinked to Burschenschaft, which is quite general.Xx236 (talk) 14:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Burschenschaft]] 

message: The word may have two meanings, here unsourced and undefined.Xx236 (talk) 14:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rassenwahn 

message: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/rechtschreibreform-und-nationalsozialismus-ein-kapitel-aus.700.de.html?dram:article_id=80161 Xx236 (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rechschreibreform 

message: 'buildings or homes owned by Jews which were subject to confiscation by force at the will of ethnic Germans in appropriate authority.' - Jewish houses were kind of a ghetto.Xx236 (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong 

message: Wrong – 'NSDAP agricultural conventions; first one held on February 8, 1931. They held Bauernkundgebungen (farmer's rallies).'Xx236 (talk) 12:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Gaufachberater' is a person 

message: Unsourced. Some 'coffees' were produced by the industry, some at home. Xx236 (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  coffee made from roasted acorns 

message: *Unsourced 'old'. Published by Heinrich Beta in 1845.
*First used in Dachau.Xx236 (talk) 14:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbeit macht frei 

message: https://www.zukunft-braucht-erinnerung.de/sprache-unterm-hakenkreuz/ Xx236 (talk) 08:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menschenmaterial 

message: Sources conform Swiss usage. Was the word used in azi Germany?Xx236 (talk) 08:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it was a Nazi slang term for a "building campaign" and is found in the Doerr's work, Nazi Deutsch.--Obenritter (talk) 21:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anbauschlacht 

message: It was rather Vorsicht. Achtung was a film poster, wasn't it?Xx236 (talk) 12:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feind hört mit! 

message: Google does not confirm. German Wikipedia mentions 'Lutherdeutsche'. Xx236 (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luther-Deutsche ? 

message: This is from HJ song, later 'da hört'. Glossary lists another version under H. Xx236 (talk) 11:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Denn heute gehört uns Deutschland / und morgen die ganze Welt"  

message: Can I ask why we have to use this nickname all the time? Their proper name was National Socialist. We don't refer to Communists as "Commies" in formal settings, or nationalists as "nats".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:1C00:FA9E:BD3C:C4C0:E21:1BFC (talk) 10:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi 

message: i see that this German word for something like "head of office" is written off as a purely Nazi word that even has its own article. i dont know how old this word is, but it is still in use today, as what it is and means. there is no known Nazi connotation for this word that is known to me. 84.215.194.30 (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  amtsleiter 

message: Theresienstadt (Terezin) has never been a "concentration camp". Main fortess (the city of Terezin self) served as a Jewish ghetto, Small fortress served as a Gestapo prison, mainly for political prisoners.The term "concentration camp Theresienstadt" is historically incorrect. 80.95.106.247 (talk) 12:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theresienstadt (CZ)