Talk:Pitzhanger Manor

message: This has been fully and thoughly  researched already and explained in the article.
So just as Liza Minnelli sings -it's  with a Z
With two places and several organizations having similarly spelt names it would be expected that 'some' people would get confused but more than 50%? 
I thought this  seems highly improbable. So here are my search result performed on 2010-04-26.
Search engine                 	term                    	result
Ealing Council site search box	“Pitzhanger Manor”      	213
Ealing Council site search box	“Pitshanger Manor”      	61
Google                        	“Pitzhanger Manor”      	26,200
Google                        	“Pitshanger Manor”      	10,800
Ealing Council site search box	“Pitzhanger Manor House”	110
Ealing Council site search box	“Pitshanger Manor House”	2
Google                        	“Pitzhanger Manor House”	161,000
Google                        	“Pitshanger Manor House”	30,200
Well, the council planing office has made a few typo errors (which is not unfair to the typists as they would be dealing with the area of Pitshanger most of the time) and advertising agents appear to have erred by checked their clients submission against the gazetteer. The remaining occurrences appear to be few and far between and could also  be proof readers errors rather than those of the writers. Buried in those results could also be people referring  to the actual  'sub-manor' of Pitshanger which had a farm house rather than a Manor house.
From now on any attempts to maintain and spread this confusion will be seen  as being  against the spirit of WP and so  will be removed as vandalism.--Aspro (talk) 11:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This has been researched already

message: As I'm getting confused as to exactly where and/or on what page  a reference originally came from, I am going over to having:
:1) A  separate Reference section at the 'very' bottom of this article. This will list the references once alphabetical.  (no  <reference /> or {reflist}  codes in it.>
:2) Have the tabs in the text link to a new Footnote section. Here the page number  and/or the  original fn number in the original text will be included. 
This will look slightly more professional, save time  and also aid others who wish to consult the sources; so save them ploughing through umpteen pages of text looking for the exact place.
See:Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Maintaining_a_separate_.22References.22_section_in_addition_to_.22Notes.22 --Aspro 11:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes & References Etc. 

message: Both Jonathan Gurnells  it appears, used  the same spelling, so it is the source used for note 1 (EBCC History) that was wrong to add an 'h'. There is a slight possibility of course, that this is another Gurnell, although I can not (readily at this moment) find any reference to another one.--Aspro (talk) 12:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling was a bit of a moveable feast at that time. They are probably alternates, and each source will depend on the spelling used in the primary source - or, it could just be a transcription error. Probably best to adopt one spelling and stick to it. cheers Kbthompson (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jonathan Gurnell

message: "an extensive restoration returned much of the building back to Soane's design". Not a native English-speaker, I do not feal as the right person to correct language but isn't "return...back" a pelonasm and should it not be changed simply to #returned" ot #took...back"? Just a thought.Ramblersen (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The lead

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Pitzhanger Manor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930003258/http://www.e-bcc.org.uk/about_us_history.html to http://www.e-bcc.org.uk/about_us_history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040812010242/http://www.westlondonfilmoffice.co.uk/Locations/newLocations.phtml?LocationType=27%2BHistoric+Houses to http://www.westlondonfilmoffice.co.uk/Locations/newLocations.phtml?LocationType=27%2BHistoric+Houses
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion