Talk:Chevrolet Captiva

message: At what point should the primary name of the article be changed to Chevrolet Captiva, rather than its Daewoo counterpart? As with all Daewoo products, it is now designed, from the beginning, to be a Chevrolet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avisron (talk • contribs) 01:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the Captiva/Winstorm is sold as a Daewoo, Holden and a Chevrolet, using the original Daewoo name avoids bias. If the next generation Captiva is launched as a Chevrolet (à la Chevrolet Cruze v. Daewoo Lacetti Premiere) then the titles will probably get changed because current Daewoos now seem to be global efforts. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Daewoo Kalos which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 09:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chevrolet Aveo which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 03:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:2011 Holden Captiva.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles on whether how to classify the car. BaboneCar (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Chevrolet Captiva. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId%3D105466
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.emerald.gm.com%2Fgmnews%2Fviewmonthlyreleasedetail.do%3Fdomain%3D520&docid=21505
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927115307/http://www.wheelsmag.com.au/wheels/site/articleIDs/5AF5DC88746CD7A0CA25725900163A60?open&template=domWheels to http://www.wheelsmag.com.au/wheels/site/articleIDs/5AF5DC88746CD7A0CA25725900163A60?open&template=domWheels
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://pr.hankyung.com/newsRead.php?md=A01&tm=1&no=352343
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I was reading through the page when I saw this sentence critical of the car which is both unsourced and rather opinionated language unfit for an encyclopaedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Captiva&type=revision&diff=1065450388&oldid=1049478302
To me, it looks more like vandalism. Any opinions? I will delete it if no-one objects.2800:150:15B:8CE:1902:5EF9:F589:D11B (talk) 20:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A rather spurious edit