Talk:Baron Ponsonby of Imokilly

message: *Burkes Peerage (106th edition available online at ) and The Complete Peerage both give Ponsonby's title as 'Baron Ponsonby of Imokilly', and not as some editors prefer, 'Baron Ponsonby, of Imokilly'.  The House of Lords Journal, available online, also uses this as his title.  At the time the peerage's creation in 1806 there was another Baron Ponsonby around, namely Baron Ponsonby of Sysonby, the GB title under which his cousin the Earl of Bessborough (an Irish earldom) sat in the House of Lords. Flozu 17:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi (Proteus), I am sorry but I have a case once more which makes your stepping in necessary (see Special:Contributions/Flozu). How I wrote at Talk:John Ponsonby, 1st Viscount Ponsonby of Imokilly, the LG states the viscountcy as Ponsonby, of Imokilly and not Ponsonby of Imokilly. However I haven't  found an entry concerning the barony, so do you know whether her statement at Talk:William Ponsonby, 1st Baron Ponsonby of Imokilly is right? Greetings ~~ Phoe talk 08:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem; it's not. The LG for 8th March 1806 says: The King has been pleased to grant the Dignity of a Baron of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland to the Right Honorable William Brabazon Ponsonby, and the Heirs Male of his Body lawfully begotten, by the Name, Style, and Title of Baron Ponsonby, of Imokilly, in the County of Cork. Burke's is renowned for adding territorial designations to titles when they shouldn't. The title is thus the same as the Viscountcy. I'll break the news. Proteus (Talk) 09:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like there are several disamb pages for the barony an what not that she's also changed. Alci12 10:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They should be fine now. Thanks for the heads up. Proteus (Talk) 11:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: As we discussed in relation to the Barony of Grey (of Codnor), the issue of territorial designations (if they can really be called that with these peerages) is a lot more complicated regarding peerages by writ. The Gazette can't really be expected to get them right when there isn't an absolutely "right" title to get. Proteus (Talk) 18:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "of Imokilly" 

message: An image used in this article, File:1st Baron Ponsonby of Imokilly.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:1st Baron Ponsonby of Imokilly.JPG Nominated for Deletion

message: Can the link back to Cromwellian Army be added in? 88.97.108.45 (talk) 22:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no mention of the Cromwellian army in the article. HandsomeFella (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cromwell