lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomasina Winslow

message: I am still planning on editing this, so please hold off on any speedy delete tag. Bearian 20:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I will be on a Wikibreak for several days in the latter half of August 2007.  To foreclose any questions about notability, thus preventing a speedy delete, I quote from WP:MUSIC in relevant parts:
A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:
1.  It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.... This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries ....
4.  Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country, reported in reliable sources ....
5. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable). ....
7. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
12. Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast on a national radio or TV network.
(and)
For composers and performers outside mass media traditions:
1. Is cited in reliable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching in a particular music genre.
2. Has been a significant musical influence on a musician or composer that qualifies for the above list.
3. Has established a tradition or school in a particular genre.
4. Has composed a number of melodies, tunes or standards used in a notable genre, or tradition or school within a notable genre.
5. Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture.
Bearian 14:03, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After doing more research online, and completing Tom Winslow, I am pleasantly surprised about how notable Thoamsina Winslow actually is. Bearian 14:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Richard Berg

message: There appears to be confusion over Berg's date of birth. One source, wargamer.com gives the year as "1941".  However, multiple sources give it as "1943", including boardgamegeek.com, which contains a biography written in the first person.  I suspect 1943 is the correct number. I have tentatively changed the year from 1941 to 1943 in the lede, unless beter information appears. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)T @ 16:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:The One with Rachel's Other Sister

message: When Monica and the gang call Chandler at work on speakerphone, what is the noise Phoebe makes when they all say hello and goodbye? Is this a refrence to something or just Pheobe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MagW (talk • contribs) 20:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pentium

message: The newer (post-2017) Pentiums are x86-64 (64-bit) processors rather than x86 (32 bit). Please can the article reflect this. John a s (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentium Gold 

message: I don't know......... Where do I find it 41.190.2.205 (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentium series 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Pentium (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  J947 † edits 19:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pentium (disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect P3nt1um has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:P3nt1um]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Punch down tool

message: At least in the UK these are called "Krone" tools at least as commonly as they're called "punchdown" tools; indeed in the UK the Krone name appears to be becoming generic in this regard - a google for "Krone tool" finds many punchdown tools that don't appear to be made by Krone. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Krone tools are used for the Krone design of connector block. This was adopted by BT in the early '80s for both exchange MDFs and also the 'New Plan' sockets in domestic subscriber premises. Unlike the US, we've only ever really had this one design since, for everything from analogue phones to local loops. Accordingly Krone tools, Krone pattern, usually made by Krone, are the only ones in common use.  In the US there are still 66 and 110 design blocks that predate Krone's design in widespread use, so there are several tools in play. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Krone tool
Talk:Wu Yihui

message: The article is not consistent in the spelling of Yi Hui or Yihui. Which is it? Please select one. --HelgeStenstrom (talk) 13:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed Yi Hui to Yihui per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese). "There should be no space between the first and second syllables of a given name". --Pengyanan (talk) 05:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yi Hui or Yihui? 
Talk:VolleyHut.com

message: A company that very publicly challenges Amazon.com about a patent has notability.  This challenge appeared in other places back in 2000, for example Dave Winer's blog, Scripting.com, but the links are no longer available. (see: Charlie Jackson takes on Amazon ) Tadams2 20:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If sources can't be provided, it's not notable. - Ageekgal 03:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:      There is a source about the challenge to Amazon, and it is still a viable link. It's reference number one, an article in Linux Journal by software industry luminary Doc Searls. Tadams2 (talk) 21:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:2007 Georgia helicopter incident

message: I have moved the article to 2007 Georgia helicopter incident as 2007 Georgia helicopter attack incident is based upon Georgian POV. In order to appear WP:NPOV the word attack should not appear in the title, particularly as one side of the incident disputes the accusation. --Russavia Dialogue 19:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The very same side rejects not only the attack accusations, but even denies the incident. Should we also remove the word "incident" from the title? What will be left: "2007 Georgia helicopter"? --KoberTalk 04:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "2007 Georgia helicopter attack" is a good title. There is nothing POV in the title.Biophys (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article moved 
Talk:List of characters in SaGa Frontier 2

message: I tagged this for expert attention because I lack the specific knowledge of this game necessary to clarify certain sections.  Specifically, the summary of Patrick's character does not specify whether it is Wil or Patrick who departs after unsuccessfully attempting that purchase.  The summary of William, above the last section we discussed, likewise does not clearly explain whether it is William or Labelle who becomes the beast.  Also, this section: "Gustave will set neither foot nor sights on Thermes..." doesn't mention whether it refers to Gustave XII or Gustave XIII.  Rather than try and rephrase things at the expense of information, I figured I'd just tag it for somebody who actually knows the characters. Elder Kibwe (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Dating agency

message: A marriage agency and a dating agency are VERY different. In a marriage agency people are there to meet people for marriage. In a dating agency the people are there to date and are not necessaryly looking to get married!
:I would agree with you on this one. Also, I think that the phenomenon of international marriage services deserves its own article. I'm not sure what would be the best name. Stayman Apple 23:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are NOT VERY GREAT DIFFERENT! In a marriage agency people are there to meet people for marriage through dating, i.e. dating for marriage, includes mail-order bride. In a dating agency the people are there to date and are not necessaryly looking to get married but MAYBE get married. Therefore a marriage agency is a type of dating agency that is DATING FOR MARRIAGE.--220.246.241.213 21:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Barricades

message: Still at it. Antyufeyev's henchmen carried out terrorist acts (killing people) in Transnistria (Piedņestrā) which Smirnov then blamed on Moldova and used to enforce martial law. Thought it was worth mentioning. PētersV 20:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that lenghtly description of their actions outside of Latvia and in connection with other events would be irrelevant. Rather you could write article on them or add this to OMON. It could only say that it is unlikely that they'll be tried because they went to another country, also that should go in responsibility not legacy section ~~Xil...sist! 14:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OMON legacy 

message: I suggest moving this article to 'The Barricades (Latvia)' or some version thereof. The article name does not have to be a direct translation of the Latvian name (if that indeed is what it is) and I think calling it simply The Barricades is too vague. A barricade can be erected anywhere at anytime and does not in itself refer to what happened in Latvia in January 1991. Thoughts? Endrū Hejs (talk) 04:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The naming rules require using most common name and it is not used anywhere, so there is no need for disambiguation ~~Xil (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: But surely the most common name would always include some qualifier to indicate where the barricades took place?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.88.5 (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: When I made this article I initially named it something else for this reason, but I later realized that it is almost universally called this and even though there are historical events involving building of barricades none of them was called Barricades, so I decided was over-thinking it and moved it long time ago and indeed nobody has had an issue with it until now - apparently it being proper noun, use of the and plural is enough not to cause confusion and further specifying would only suggest that there were other events with such name ~~Xil (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no way that the expression "The Barricades" in English with no qualifier, is ever going to refer to this event unambiguously. Endrū Hejs (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: People look for things under their common names, which is why articles are not named as precisely as possible, there is no naming conflict here either and even if somebody happens upon this looking for something else there are links on top of article suggesting where to look for it ~~Xil (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think I have a valid point, but I'm happy to concede to you. Endrū Hejs (talk) 03:04, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that the point is not valid :) it's that I think there are valid reasons not to do it. ~~Xil (talk) 13:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:2007 North Korean floods

message: Is it just me, or does anyone else think that it is wishful think to expect a picture of any disaster in north korea?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphamone (talk • contribs) 08:46, August 26, 2007 (UTC) 
:Acutally, there are pictures out there, however, since I've started the article last week, i've yet to find one that I can use on Wikipedia following their rules.  Maybe someone has better luck than I. Falkonry 02:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably pretty wishful thinking, at least finding a useable one. They've stopped allowing journalists into the country, so that'd make it pretty difficult to get photographs that are free to use on Wikipedia. It's gotta be pretty bad if they're cancelling the Arirang though, damn... A. Stillwell  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.89.73.100 (talk) 17:54, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 
You might get lucky with a NASA satellite image from here; you'd need to work out a before and during date and then see if the satellite was in the right place. --Peta 12:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I checked an the only Korea map shown isn't enough to provide any detail where the flooding occured.  On the Floods webpage, there is no map for the Korean flood. Falkonry 18:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding the flood articles in need of a picture
Talk:Green–Tao theorem

message: I think that the theorem is even stronger than what is said in the article: for any natural number k, there exist infinitely many k-term arithmetic progressions of primes. This is, for any natural number k, there exists infinitely many pairs (p,q) such that
: p,p + q,p + 2q,...,p + (k - 1)q
are all prime numbers (cf. http://www.dms.umontreal.ca/~andrew/PDF/PrimePatterns.pdf).
:Yes, there are infinitely many for all k. This is a trivial consequence of the theorem, since for any n there is an arithmetic progression of k*n primes, and that can be split into n progressions of k primes (or more when overlapping progressions are allowed). The title of the paper is "The primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions", and the abstract starts "We prove that there are arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions of primes." This is the formulation the authors and most sources use, so I think we should do that too. PrimeHunter 23:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right. Thanks for the reply. (The authors also use the "infinitely many" formulation in the theorem 1.1.) Jayme 09:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Infinitely'' many arithmetic progressions 

message: I have seen the prooof and it was the simpliest proof i have ever seen.  Just obs n! and that n!+1, n!+2, ... are all composite  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.226.195.85 (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an easy proof that there are arbitrarily long consecutive sequences of composite numbers. The Green–Tao theorem is that there are arbitrarily long arithmetic sequences of prime numbers. —David Eppstein 22:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be precise, n!+1 is sometimes a factorial prime, but n!+2 to n!+n is composite for n > 1. PrimeHunter 23:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proof 

message: Why is the 2nd statement of the theorem, regarding the arbitrary set A, the "main" theorem, although it is in the paper the 2nd statement. The article is written so that people do not understand. --Tensorproduct (talk) 02:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written to be overcomplicated...
Talk:Roberts (surname)

message: I have just removed a large portion of this article due to its lack of encyclopedic content. This section was full of spelling and grammar errors, weasel words, original research, and unsourced claims. 
Some examples of text I removed:
::*This kind of study and generalising is completely useless for the Roberts surname. (opinion, original research)
::*It was never Welsh given as some web sites wrongly suggest.  (without any source to back up the claim)
::*Some have made studies on the distribution of the surname in old maps and have assumed that all Roberts families originated in North Wales! True it was popular there... (again unsourced, and using weasel words, as well as what seems to be original research)
If anyone feels as though I removed material in error, please discuss it here before reinstating the removed paragraphs so that we can decide together the best way to fix this article. If anyone has good information about the name Roberts, with sources to back it up, any attention you can give to this article would be greatly appreciated by all, I'm sure. Thanks, romarin [talk ] 20:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stuart McDonald (cartoonist)

message: Created this page. Cujhanso 20:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Eclipse projects

message: I've tied to make this page more useful by cutting out the less notable plugins and categorising them. More work is still required to expand the descriptions of each project. String-Bean 20:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't we list Google's Android in the Third party projects section? Mathiastck (talk) 00:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Android 

message: Should KNIME be added here or under the Eclipse software page? Ascentury (talk) 16:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  KNIME 
Talk:Kecoughtan, Virginia

message: So if it is "the home of the oldest continually occupied English settlement in the U.S.A.", then how long? What date was it no longer English? 1776? Antilog (talk) 04:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Collected Jorkens, Volume One

message: Per query, yes, the Prefaces are there, each on its own page. What would be nice would be to have the Jorkens page, with background, one or more of the little publicity pieces and an illustration of the character (but the latter could be a challenge on copyright grounds). And any word of any other Jorkens pieces (I heard rumours at a convention once, a couple of years ago). Skir77 21:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:30 Foot Fall

message: 6/02/2011 - Htownmusic:
It became clear to me that the reason this article "needs" help is because the band put up the bio themselves and are trying to promote themselves the best way they know possible. I added the band bio frame. There's a lot of content that needs to be cleared up (current/past members,labels, discography) any information in regard to these items would be obliged. Once I am a bit clearer on the discography and labels, I will compile them into a proper album list and try to clean up some of the junk.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.189.246.221 (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Papaya (group)

message: Can someone add information and sources about their recent 15th anniversary reunion performance. Monni (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reunion 
Talk:Checkley cum Wrinehill

message: I am unable to access population statistics (Checkley finds an unrelated parish), and have therefore included just the historical figures from Genuki. Espresso Addict 21:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing 2001 census figures
Talk:Last Watch

message: If anybody knows when the official English translation of this book will come out, it would probably be a good idea to include it in the article--it can probably be assumed that many people reading the English language wiki would also read the English language novel.
The official German tranlsation is available as of 30th September 2007. Amazon.co.uk claims that the English translation will be published on 3rd July 2008. ChristineD 18:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This series is nothing if not inconsistent...  Unfortunately, there are good examples to support both viewpoints.  I'm not sure whether this was conscious or not on the part of the author. - Richfife (talk) 20:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation into English

message: I have changed Gloom to Twilight, as this is the word used in the English translations that I have read (UK). If the word Gloom was used in the US translation, then I apologise.SaundersW 20:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked "Day Watch" to be absolutely sure.  Twilight (with a capital T) is used in the US version of that book as well. - Richfife 21:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! I'm looking forward to seeing the book. SaundersW 21:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gloom/Twilight

message: Can someone add the Russian Publication date?24.21.131.140 (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication date

message: I have little comprehension of the Russian language, but with the english publication, it seems to me that the article should retitled to Last Watch and references in the body conformed to that title.  Even taking nuances into consideration, final and last mean the same thing.  I'm glad a contributor did bother putting the article up before the English release, but unless there is a specific, verifiable, basis to do otherwise, the article title should be changed and links made to conform.  IMHO (talk) 06:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Does anyone know if there will be another sequel to the Night Watch series? Redge (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel
Talk:Wadcutter

message: This explains what a wadcutter is, but not why it's named that. Could someone elaborate? --StarChaser Tyger (talk) 08:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the answer here: http://www.gunownersalliance.com/Rabbi_0190.htm Bloodshedder (talk) 08:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice. Thanks... --StarChaser Tyger (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Link is already dead. "They get their name from their ability to cut a sharply defined plug, circle or wad of paper at the point of impact."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.206.89 (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whence wadcutter?
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Latvia

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:4dventure

message: I went ahead & merged what is here into Editions of Dungeons & Dragons, but I figure this is more a stub for what is (presumably) going to be announced in...about an hour, so I'll let it stand as a duplication.  Okay?  --mordicai. 21:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: Essentially "4dventure" was a temporary marketing term for the 4th edition of Dungeons & Dragons.  Temporary marketing terms don't really need articles.  While you could rename it something like "4th edition Dungeons & Dragons," individual editions of D&D don't have articles; they're all covered at Editions of Dungeons & Dragons. 4e is covered there.  I'm prone to put this up for deletion, but since that's a bit of a bureaucratic hassle for people who object, I'd like to float the idea a bit more informally first.  Does anyone else care? — Alan De Smet | Talk 23:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: its early and because i don't like some auto-delete feature replacing human decision and prefer AfD procedure to make sure whatever happens to the information and content herein is dealt with properly i removed the aforementioned deletion template. and doing so on a holiday or around one when people may have other things to do isn't really something someone should do considering wikipedias times for automatic functions. shadzar|Talk|contribs 17:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rightio, that's fine.  (Mind you, it's not an auto-delete.  The deletion needs to be done by an editor who hopefully excercises common sense.)  It's now up for AfD. — Alan De Smet | Talk 06:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this article?