lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Xiangsheng

message: There has been a repetitive addition/deletion of Jonathan Kent under famous actors section. According to the webpage the editor referred to, he is a Princeton student who only gave a performance as a 'talent show' in an international student debate. By no means can he be listed as a famous actor if this is all his performance.
Zhengjp 03:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Jonathan Kent 

message: The usage and primary topic of  and  is under discussion, see talk:crosstalk (disambiguation) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Crosstalk"
Talk:Chinese variety art

message: Can we cut the woke BS please? In English it's called Chinese circus, period. Human acrobatics and other similar elements always were and always will be called circus in this language. Each region, country, culture has its own specific characteristics, some more universal and some less. If we would need to invent new terms for each local variety of common, well-established vernacular words, we'd end up like the Japanese of WWII, who hardly understood a word of their emperor's capitulation speech, because he spoke "court Japanese". We're enforcing a self-inflicted, secular Babylonian confusion of tongues. (Although "wokeness" is less and less "secular" and turning into religion-style dogma, or a neuro-psychotic affliction.) Let's please stay sane, don't go mad voluntarily. Arminden (talk) 15:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circus, of course
Talk:Zhu Zhi

message: Condensed a few sections to save time.  White Whirlwind  咨  12:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 
Talk:The Story of Zoulvisia

message: Around 50 fairytale articles, including this one, had ATU classmarks but were also tagged for notability and other issues. I've looked through them and removed the tags from around half of them, including this page. The article had been worked on since it was tagged and now appears to no longer need the tag. If you wish to reinstate the tag, please do so but also please add a note to the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Folklore/To do/ATU fairytale notability‎. Thanks --Northernhenge (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed "multiple issues" tag
Talk:Puget Sound Navigation Company

message: The content of this page was moved from Black Ball Line which was made into a disambiguation page.  The page and history of it just before the move can be seen here  Jeepday 03:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move History

message: usual treatment for subsidiaries  DGG ( talk ) 18:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Neah Bay Dock Company]] 

message: See https://www.cohoferry.com/ Broichmore (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Ball Ferry Line - M.V. Coho
Talk:Zhu Yi (Eastern Wu)

message: Just reading the novel - others should add more:
*Sun Chen lets Zhu Yi behead after losing against Wang Ji and Chen Qian. Sun Chen had threatened Zhu Yi before that this would happen in case of failureLuo Guanzhong, Three Kingdoms: A Historical Novel: Volume IV, translated by Moss Roberts. page 2024 (in chapter 112). Foreign Languages Press. Tenth Printing 2007. First Edition 1995. Beijing, China 1995. (read pages before about why). ----Erkan Yilmaz 10:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: clear distinction between fact and fiction
Talk:Brazilian Communist Party (1992)

message: What's the point of having an article about the "refounded" PCB, if the article Brazilian Communist Party already contemplates that party? This causes confusion. - João Jerónimo (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article exists?
Talk:Napco Four Wheel Drive Vehicles

message: The following history is posted on http://www.napco4x4.org Permission to post the following material has been granted by Pat Wilson. Webmaster of napco4x4.org —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cinemafx (talk • contribs) 03:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napco History 

message: Napco history has been removed for corrections —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cinemafx (talk • contribs) 05:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napco History
Talk:Ted Cowan

message: Hello,
I am Clive Cowan, son of Ted Cowan.
On 22nd/23rd February 2007 I have rewritten much of Ted Cowan's page adding new content, new Wikipedia internal links and an external Web link. I shall continue to moderate his page both checking on the accuracy of and ammending other contributor's additions.
Thank you for your interest in my father's work, if you have detail or comments you would like to bring to my attention, you are very welcome to enter them here.
--Clive Cowan 13:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is "The Champion"?  The article mentions it like it's some sort of publication but the link to "The Champion" doesn't list a newspaper, magazine, or comic book.  Perhaps an article on The Champion (comics) or The Champion (newspaper) is needed?  Dismas|(talk) 10:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Champion 

message: Just a few points as to why I feel that this article has merit and should not be deleted:
*The original author did not put the  tag on it, another user did.  Granted, they made substantial edits but other editors have worked on this article.
*The writer is noteworthy as the external link can show.
*The article could be referenced to establish notability.
All that I can think of off the top of my head...  Dismas|(talk) 11:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy delete 

message: I proposed deletion because:
*The bulk of the article in its present form was contributed to and edited by myself.
*There were some errors in the original biographicle article of a nature personal to the Article's subject.
*It has been politely suggested to me that the nature of the edits I made may unwittingly be fringe or contrary to the policies of Wikipedia - so delete them.
*It is appearing controversial to contribute to my father's article - so again delete my contributions.
*No editor other than the original contributor and myself have made any significant content changes.
*By all means revert to the original contributor's version, delete my edits and start again.
Thanks.
--Clive Cowan 12:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Speedy Delete 

message: My thanks to the editors who took the trouble to kindly explain to me some Wikipedia guidelines and cleaned up the presentation, and to the Administrators who confirmed notability. I have made the content a more NPOV, edited out some unverifiable content, and removed two blind internal links. Also I have shortened my opening paragraph.
--Clive Cowan 19:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks to Editors and Administrators 

message: This article has been automatically rated as Stub class. I feel it has now moved beyond the scope of this categorisation with the additional content such that Start or B class would be more appropriate. However, I myself am unsure as to how to implement this change as invited by the automatic header on this discussion page. I therefore invite an editor more experienced with WikiPedia syntax to rate the article's content and classify accordingly.
Thank You.
--Clive Cowan 19:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Biography Article Assessment
Talk:Air Nippon

message: The airline is widely known as "Air Nippon Koku" (エアーニッポン航空) and I'd always assumed that "ANK" comes from this.  However, the article has been changed to state that the abbreviation ANK comes from the full name Air Nippon Kabushiki Kaisha (lit. Air Nippon corp. ltd.) -- but wouldn't that be ANKK then? Jpatokal 12:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of ANK? 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. eviolite (talk) 04:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Balance of powers

message: I'm far more familiar with "balance of powers" as a framework for international relations than as a synonym for "separation of powers".
71.247.47.231 03:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. This phrase is not a common synonym for "separation of powers", but when I redirected it to the disambiguation page, I was reverted. 216.8.172.35 (talk) 12:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Ars

message: User:Bkonrad, stop reverting with a boilerplate edit summary. Explain your reasons. Ars is a a word, which several entries derive from. Please explain what's "proper" by having a disambiguation page refer "also" to entries, without first having one main entry. CapnZapp (talk) 09:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It fails on two points. It is a non-article dictionary entry and even if there were some article with relevant content, it is not the primary topic and should not be listed first. older ≠ wiser 10:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why isn't it the primary topic, User:Bkonrad? And why did you revert to an "it can also mean" without anything before it? CapnZapp (talk) 11:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Because it does not satisfy any criteria of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The "also" was an error left over from previous editors. I hadn't noticed it. older ≠ wiser 12:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

text: Yes, any rule may have an exception and here a foreign word may entered contrary to NOTDICT, but there must be really serious arguments to make an exception to a long-established practice. The purpose of DAB page is navigation and  link performs this function in a satisfactory and standard way. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

text: I've now improved the Wiktionary link, seeing that the previous link, defining ars as the "plural of ar" is profoundly unhelpful. The useful link would be, and is now, to the Latin section of Wiktionary, where ars is defined as art or skill. CapnZapp (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a pretty poor improvement. Why point to one language definition without even mentioning the language? Why is one definition more important than any other? Readers looking for dictionary content can find it without too much difficulty without such misguided improvements. older ≠ wiser 13:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

text:  - false reasoning. Just the same logic I may say "the link Ars defining it as Ars, Iran is grossly useless." Staszek Lem (talk) 03:44, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper form
Talk:Poecilia velifera

message: This page needs more context. What is it about? --lightspeedchick 03:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussions 

message: The photo shows a variety developed from breeding for selective traits. Wild types look like this:
https://acuarioadictos-none1416823692.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/upps/2012/03/Poecilia-Velifera-01.jpg
Should it at least be labeled as a variety? -rudyard (talk) 18:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I think showing a selectively bred strain instead of the wild type is misleading. 2600:1700:D6E0:65E0:B185:97CD:65E7:88D7 (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of, or to, photo?
Talk:Audacity (audio editor)

message: I noticed the section of the article regarding forks had primary sources, but lacked secondary and tertiary sources. I'd like to bring them to attention to add some secondary and tertiary sources.
:This spawned several forks, most prominently among them Tenacity[63] and Audacium.[64] The company reversed course, falling back to error/crash reporting and optional update checking instead.[65][66] As a result, the developers of the forks lost interest[67] and sent their forks into an indefinite hiatus.[63]
References 63, 64 and 67 in this passage point to the repositories of each project. While this helps for Wikipedia:Verifiability, it makes it difficult to evaluate Wikipedia:Notability and decide which forks (and which events) are worth mentioning and which ones are not.
I believe there must be some third-party articles that mention some of the most notable forks, but my research has so far been unsuccessful. Can anybody help and find some sources for this passage?
Skencer11 (talk) 21:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections lacking secondary and tertiary sources 

message: I have started converting the big features list to prose and in the process removed some run-of-the-mill stuff (such as: copy-paste and undo exists, multi-platform support as that's in the infobox anyway) and moved some other stuff down to the version history. However, in the process I stumbled a bit into the question of which features of Audacity are important, which aren't and what's run-of-the-mill. In particular, I'm unsure about: 
* Individual effects (change tempo, noise reduction, vocal reduction are directly mentioned, but a lot more could be mentioned)
* Whether or not any individual file type or plugin type is supported
* Audio analysis using FFT (what audio analysis isn't doing FFT at some stage?)
* UI Themes and waveform colorways
Even the non-destructive editing thing is fairly standard, and the only reason it's worth mentioning here IMHO is that Audacity didn't have these features for so long. 
NB, I can't promise I'll have the time to implement feedback on this myself, but I thought having this discussion is going to be helpful for the future anyway.  -- LWinterberg (talk) 14:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Features list 

message: muse are globohomo. audacity is dead. "protected groups"? BS. Yeah, I know, this comment will be removed by globohomo (you). 80.43.63.48 (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  muse
Wikipedia talk:Roll on the floor and laugh

message: This is my first essay to Wikipedia. I would like to expound this essay with other editors. I will attempt not to be its owner.
All critiques will be greatly appreciated. Ronbo76 03:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Need to do copyedit on this soon. Essays calm me down. Ronbo76 15:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Calming down is a great improvement point. Maybe a gentle suggestion to have a sign that causes an editor to laugh, breathe, take a break, etc should be added. Ronbo76 15:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First contribution (actually maybe second or third article created) but who's counting? 

message: I have noted with a couple of other editors that writing or participating in essays has become a very release for them and me. I intend to polish this essay with other Wikipedian editors' help especially in those times when I sense an edit war flaming within me; ergo, following the essay's guidelines.  Ronbo76 04:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial thought on why this essay was created 

message: *Needs improvement and a TO DO list. Will edit later tonight.Ronbo76 04:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be a little more serious but one that does not show weakness. Ronbo76 13:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Adopt a conversative tone. Ronbo76 22:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement 

message: * Develop a Pro and Con section. Ronbo76 04:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be a little more serious but one that does not show weakness. Ronbo76 13:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Adopt a conversative tone. Ronbo76 22:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do list

message: Since "Wikipedia:ROFL" sounds a bit too much like a shortcut title, I've moved it to "Wikipedia:Roll on the floor and laugh", so it sounds more like an essay title (Like Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose). --AAA! (AAAA) 03:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. Thanks for the edits. I like working on this essay when the edit demon flares up within me. Soothes me to the soul! Ronbo76 16:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts

message: #REDIRECT Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting
Please note that Wikipedia:Notability (artists) may become quite relevant to this deletion sorting related articles in the future.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  03:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I can't figure out how to link it, but I nominated a category to be merged  Clubmarx 18:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I nominated another one Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_December_23#Category:Art_by_subject. --Clubmarx (talk) 02:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't put it here; add it to the list - that's what it's for!  Johnbod (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it but it's dragged along another 5 discussions for some reason. Johnbod (talk) 04:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I couldn't see how to just add the one.... --Clubmarx (talk) 04:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The template doesn't seem to work for category discussions, so i've just added a link. Johnbod (talk) 04:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories for discussion 

message: I've just now started off Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/History of photography. -- Hoary (talk) 07:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Deletion sorting/History of photography

message: There is not much activity in this deletion cat; it would make sense to merge it with the  "Artists" del category to create  "Visual Arts and Artists" or similar.104.163.148.25 (talk) 01:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:François Brassard

message: The readings listed at 
http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=U1ARTU0000418SUBReading might be helpful if anyone wishes to expand the article. --Eastmain 03:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Readings suggested by Encyclopedia of Music in Canada
Talk:Solanum lycocarpum

message: :69.140.152.55 (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although we obviously have two photographs of the plant, I suspect people would like a good look at the fruit itself, since that's what both people and wolves eat. Lockesdonkey (talk) 01:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:Chad Gray

message: KEEP i do not like mudvayne, however, they are a popular enough band and this guy's side project and record label are also linked, he is notable enough The Hemogoblin 04:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination for deletion

message: This page has been vandalized and I think someone should try to look into it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.28.58.151 (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch for vandals 

message: If no-one finds a reference for his siblings I will remove the paragraph. It's probably not notable anyway but I'm getting the feeling fans have added their own names to the list. --Freikorp (talk) 07:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there have been no objections or references found I have now removed the info, please don't put it back unless you providing a valid reference. --Freikorp (talk) 06:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siblings 

message: What does that mean exactly? It can't be a references to lack of profanity, as I know Mudvayne at least have used some cuss words in their lyrics. Freikorp (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known for his clean singing?
Talk:Erin O'Brien (actress)

message: this may need a disambiguation page, to make the distinction between Erin O'Brien the actress from Erin O'Brien the writer.
Geoffrey.landis 04:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: :OK, I made a page for Erin O'Brien (writer), and renamed the original Erin O'Brien page (the article for the actress) to Erin Joanne O'Brien to try to distinguish her both from the writer, and also from the four other actresses named Erin O'Brien. Geoffrey.landis 22:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I must be missing something.  ". . . literally every sentence in the article features meticulous attribution" is not a phrase that I would apply to this article.  There's only one citation for anything in the article, and that's only to verify one aspect of her family life.  The current tag on the article is completely appropriate.  I'm not sure that this artist actually deserves an article, if her chief claim to fame was Girl on the Run.  Most of the world never had the chance to see that work, as it was never widely transmitted or distributed.  CzechOut  ☎ | ✍ 21:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Singaporean Mahjong scoring rules

message: The problem of house rules is that they are unsourced and are Original research. In that sense, I am already asking for help on sources and references and not having luck beside that one book that I found. This article is bloated as it is without any sources and adding unsourced, original research house rules. Thanks --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, please stop reverting the changes as they are not generally helpful. I noted your edit summary on house rules but I like to emphasize this again, they are unsourced and are deemed original research. Without a source, I can write any house rules with no sources and nobody is able to establish is this a house rule or not. This article should be a basic informative article on Singaporean Mahjong scoring rules and not every single variant, especially if it is unsourced. Thanks--Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

text: Hi, please note the above issues as well. Thanks --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  House rules 

message: Please add back hanyu pinyin. The edits by Justanothersgwikieditor is his own opinion and not helpful when showing chinese characters on helping people read them on an english wiki.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:3003:2003:2054:393D:E4D7:C46A:2EE (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanyu Pinyin 

message: it is actually actively unhelpful to turn the whole wiki page into a 3 line paragraph that doesn’t go into any detail about scoring. sg mahjong has always been house rule heavy. but the ones posted in the wiki before can be said to be commonly accepted. it’s seriously a bad decision to remove completely. there’s a reason there are people reverting it often, it just is not helpful to anyone trying to find sg mahjong scoring. when i look it up in the wiki i’m not trying to find some 3 liner about how it is boosted by animals and flowers. 119.56.16.164 (talk) 03:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  total lack of detail
Talk:Joseph G. Butler Jr.

message: Here is a link to incorporate from Time magazine: []
Died. Joseph Green Butler Jr., 87, a creator of the Mahoning Valley steel industry; at Youngstown, Ohio. Iron and steel men called him "Uncle Joe." President McKinley had called him friend; they had attended village school together in Niles, Ohio. 
--Daysleeper47 17:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time reference 

message: This article would benefit from an expanded lead and the inclusion of a "Personal life" section. -- twelsht (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrading [[Joseph G. Butler, Jr.]] 

message: Lambert, Joseph, Jr., and Rick Shale. First Citizen, the Industrious Life of Joseph G. Butler, Jr.(Jefferson, North Carolina; McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2022). LNHA-11 (talk) 00:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Sources
Talk:Jerry Van Amerongen

message: Reworked promotional material provided by User:Csyndicate, presumably a Creator's Syndicate employee, in favor of more NPOV format.  Irene Ringworm 04:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rework