Talk:Otto Heinrich Warburg

message: This article is pretty POV.  I'm gonna remove POV comments pending citation. Turly-burly 09:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with you there...I've been slowly adding to this page (mostly anonymously before I created an account) since it was in infancy.  I was so surprised/disappointed upon checking this article for a bit more info after reading about Warburg...it was so small...If I remember correctly, the first time I checked there wasn't even an article.  Glad to see it's gotten to where it is and I hope (and will do what I can to make sure) it gets to the complexity you're talking about.  Warburg really has done some great work that everyone should be aware of.  Thanks to everyone who's contributed.  --JohnDoe0007 09:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV edits

message: Warburg is regarded as some sort of a hero by the alternative cancer treatment lobby (e.g. Ralph Moss). Oddly, there is actually fairly little controversy about his experimental finding that cancer cells are highly metabolically active and absorb glucose preferentially. What is controversial is whether this is the cause of cancer. Like other outspoken early 20th century scientists, he may have been wrong. JFW | T@lk 09:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding of Warburg's work is not that he claimed that anaerobic respiration was the ultimate cause of cancer, but rather that he claimed that the cure to cancer lay in finding the ultimate causes of cancer's anerobic respiration, and reversing them.  He was adamantly against the theory that viruses cause cancer.--Alterrabe (talk) 14:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he right? 

message: The source that I corrected is that listed in Worldcat for the ISBN number cited.  There is no verification of the page citation (210).  The multiple authors are not from the 3rd ed. (ISBN no. cited); Odelberg and the Nobel Foundation are listed by WorldCat and by other sources as the more recent editors of the book cited.  Please investigate further.  The citation format is not correct either.  The link to the reference in the list is not to the proper reference source apparently.  It was also incorrect in the other Wikipedia article.  Please provide verification of the source being cited.  A quotation from page 210 of the actual volume being cited would serve to verify the claim of the "rumor" being stated in that source.  Because rumor is the subject of the statement, a reliable and verifiable source is absolutely required.  Following the links in WorldCat (and other book sources online) do not go to the edition with those multiple editors. --NYScholar (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is being discussed in Talk:Nobel Prize#Nobel: The Man and His Prizes, 3rd ed.  –panda (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect sources

message: I have this book in front of me and the reference information that I've included is correct.  Regardless of what Worldcat may state about it, the individual sections of the book was written by the authors listed and was edited by The Nobel Foundation and W. Odelberg, Coordinating Editor.  So I've changed back the in-line ref for Otto Heinrich Warburg and added the editors to the reference in the Nobel Prize and Otto Heinrich Warburg articles.  But if there were other in-line refs that I missed, I would appreciate it if you could help change them back.  Thanks for being thorough!  –panda (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is being discussed in Talk:Nobel Prize#Nobel: The Man and His Prizes, 3rd ed.  –panda (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel: The Man and His Prizes, 3rd ed

message: :Image:Otto Warburg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Otto Warburg.jpg

message: This article contains the following: "...an ineffective regime claimed to treat cancer..." "Regime" should be "regimen". http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/regimen72.250.140.128 (talk) 15:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelled word in article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Otto Heinrich Warburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071219084948/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9076088 to http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9076088
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified