Talk:Apache Lucene

message: Have updated the latest Lucene implementations.
--Rkthorne 03:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated

message: Removed link to Lupy project since it has been retired   Open2universe 04:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Retired

message: I don't know the product, but I think it was not ported to so many different programming languages. I expect it to have bindings for those languages?
:I have the same feeling. Notably, I did not find a native C++ implementation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.180.228.22 (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At least the PHP port is definitely a stand alone implementation. It uses the same index format, but runs without using any Java code.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.47.226 (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ported vs bindings 

message: Which one is better for indexing scanned text jLibrary, solr or nutch we currently using Lucene   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.72.124 (talk) 06:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to index images of text pages 

message: Nowaday, it seems like Lucene become boarder than Lucene Java?  158.108.135.144 05:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucene -> Lucene Java 

message: Java versus C#: Since the code is so similar, comparing the performance on the different virtual machines would make for a very interesting comparison between Java and C#.
Has anyone done such a study? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.7.147.153 (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance 

message: I don't think this article answers the "What is it?" question in the first (or second) sentence. It does not happen before in the second section, "Features and common use":
"... full text indexing and searching ..."
What do you think?
--Mortense (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia standards 

message: The C-based with Perl and respectively Ruby bindings "loose ports" should probably be merged here. They are briefly covered in the Lucene book, and don't have much additional coverage. Apache Lucy should be mentioned here as well. FuFoFuEd (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  KinoSeach and Ferret 

message: Is it really correct to say that Nutch is based on Lucene? It used to bundle Lucene as indexing component, but now you typically plug in Solr or Elastic. Janhoy (talk) 10:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutch Lucene based or not? 

message: I was wondering where does this name Lucene from? Does anyone know the origin of it? Is it from the Switzerland city Lucerne? Biogerm (talk) 12:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucene, the name 

message: On 2021-09-15 - the article was edited and the part referencing the halt/end of the indri project was removed with the hint "not notable".
Abother search-engine project decidedbthat lucenen was a better codevase for their search-engine then their own. Basically switching from providing the "same functionallity" to "kind-of-extension".
How can this be not notable? 2.247.248.244 (talk) 05:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, your edit looked okay, really the problem is the independence of the sources you used.  A third-party reliable source (such as a tech magazine, book, or academic article) discussing Indri's merger with Lucene's codebase would establish that it's notable enough to include in the this article. But, I wonder even then if that wouldn't be a detail more appropriate to include in an article on Indri. Why is this relevant to Lucene's development history? Suriname0 (talk) 14:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucene and Indri