lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Allen & Overy

message: No doubt Allen and Overy are acting for Goldman Sachs, but should be clear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.104.11 (talk) 12:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Allen and Overy seem to be acting for Goldman on several points.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.104.11 (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No doubt
Talk:Allens Boots

message: This article doesn't seem notable to me. I've seen other articles of similar relevance deleted; I'm not nominating this article for deletion because I don't agree with article deletion for this reason, but I would like to suggest that this page not be listed in the Category:Boots index (for some reason the link isn't displaying: :Category:Boots). 129.186.253.5 (talk) 22:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The company is covered in-depth by multiple reliable sources, meeting the General Notability Guidelines and the notability guidelines for companies. (I fixed your category link. The trick is a colon between the open brackets and the word Category.)  - Dravecky (talk) 00:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this notable?
Talk:Alpena Power Company

message: Hi all,
Please see https://findingaids.lib.umich.edu/catalog/umich-bhl-851292. This would appear to be only in the way of alerting UMich students to primary sources about  Alpena County and so on.
In this context, please also see Alpena County George N. Fletcher Public Library
Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Alpena Power Company historically significant? I can also see that [[George N. Fletcher]] has never had an en.wp article
Talk:Cuyuna Iron Range Municipally-Owned Elevated Metal Water Tanks

message: I visit this article because it was mentioned in a discussion about MPS documents at wt:NRHP.  Actually, I like the article, and I think it serves well as describing the five water tanks that are individually listed within National Register of Historic Places listings in Crow Wing County, Minnesota.  I agree with author Elkman's judgment that creating one article to cover them all, as a set, is better than 5 separate articles (and also better than having both a combo article and 5 separate articles).  I think this is a good example article about the topic of a Multiple Property Submission study.
I wonder, though, if it should be developed some more in a few ways:
*Because this is the article one reaches by clicking on the five separate individual NRHP entries in the Crow County list, so, I think there should be some indication at the top of this article that Elevated Metal Water Tank, Crosby, Elevated Metal Water Tank, Cuyuna, Elevated Metal Water Tank, Deerwood, 
Elevated Metal Water Tank, Ironton, and Elevated Metal Water Tank, Trommald redirect here.
*Because it is the only article covering those five, somewhere their separate location info and NRHP reference numbers and other info that would appear in separate NRHP infoboxes about in each of them, should be given in this article
*A map showing their locations would be good (and/or a Google map link that would show their 5 locations using coordinates info in this article).
Perhaps more? doncram (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible development of article 

message: It looks like the link to the location of the Cuyuna Water tower is wrong and it is still in existence. Link to google maps showing the water tower at the junction of North St and Crow Wing County RD31 in Cuyuna.
https://www.google.com/maps/@46.5187227,-93.9232384,3a,60y,53.56h,114.98t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sUi-E8-H0lRemZoZ7sQHC3g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.23.250.194 (talk) 03:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the Cuyuna Water Tower
Talk:Alteon WebSystems

message: There is a part in the section: History, incorrectly spelled 'Inernet', so I'm going to change the spelling...
Per footnote (6), it's supposed to read: "....into its Personal Internet product line,.."
71.139.181.216 (talk) 22:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  personal Inernet? 
Talk:Altia

message: There are news, that Altia OYJ and Arcus ASA (Norway) will be merge to Anora PLC. https://www.thespiritsbusiness.com/2020/09/altia-and-arcus-merge-to-become-global-player/
--2001:16B8:2E17:7C00:EC50:CCE9:6EF4:8413 (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fusion of Altia OYJ and Arcus ASA
Talk:Altium

message: Would be good to have a list of main competitors like Allegro and CadSoft Eagle called out. In fact wikipedia doesnt have a very good overview of EDA suites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.254.216 (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competing products 

message: I believe there is an error in one of the dates. It says that Protel for Windows was the first windows-based PCB design system in 1999. However, Allegro for Windows was released in 1998 (I was the product manager). So either the date is wrong, or Protel wasn't first. I believe the date is wrong. -- Steve Chidester  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.73.163 (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 1999 is definitely incorrect (or the article certainly seems to imply the first Windows version was after 1999). I have the latest non-DXP Windows version on my system (Advanced PCB Design 2.8), and its executable file is dated April 1995, it was the first viable/stable Windows version. It looks like the "PFW" (Protel For Windows) support files date back to April 1993, possibly consistent with the release of the earlier Windows versions (which I never used), I remember this was in the early 90s. The 99SE version is still in use today. In response to the point raised below about neutrality, I think the article is a little biased in Altium's favour, not majorly, but it doesn't convey the fact that things like introduction of the FPGA focus were somewhat controversial at the time with users who demanded improvements to the core PCB tools. Adx (talk) 01:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Non-notable stub with content worth saving. Kb.au (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not merge two competing EDA suites in the same article, also there are many others.  Mahjongg (talk) 14:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Autotrax]]
Talk:Altsys

message: Article should be maintained.  Documents early history of DTP market and provides background information on a popular product.  Tolliver.4 17:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed  as this article has been significantly expanded with material establishing notability since Feb 2007 - Bevo 22:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Article Altsys mentions that a license exclusion prevented the transfer of FreeHand (formerly Virtuoso) to Adobe. The Article Adobe FreeHand states that the FTC took action to prevent a transfer of FreeHand to Adobe in course of Adobe acquiring Aldus in 1994. This is inconsistent and should be corrected and backed with appropriate sources. --Poc (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Licensing Reasons
Talk:Aluminum Model Toys

message: In line citations would not improve this article.  They are cumbersome, difficult to construct and difficult to alter when new references are added. They are not normally used in most publishing outlets; professional outlets use APA or MLA.  APA systems are much more direct, easy to interpret and, electronically, easy to alter.  --Cstevencampbell (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In Line Citations
Talk:Amazon Bookstore Cooperative

message: ===Pictures===
I spoke to one of the store owners and will be getting some old store images from her. Figuring out who took them and how to contact them for permission may be a challenge, but I'll start working on it once I get them. I also have emails out to some other people that may have older images. Cloveapple (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Progress on expanding article

message: I spoke to one of the store owners and will be getting some old store images from her. Figuring out who took them and how to contact them for permission may be a challenge, but I'll start working on it once I get them. I also have emails out to some other people that may have older images. Cloveapple (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: I found a dissertation that covers some Amazon history and that may put some things in context so I'm reading and absorbing it. Cloveapple (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Text sources
Talk:Ameren

message: I note that we have a minor edit war between IP user:67.188.207.223 and user:ElKevbo over the use of Wikinvest as a source.  Please note that Wikis are not considered reliable sources under Wikipedia's rules.  Please find another source for the information. Blueboar (talk) 16:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Wikinvest as a source 

message: Replace Thomas Voss with Warner Baxter as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Current citation link is still valid.
199.38.133.55 (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request correction of CEO name 

message: Suggest adding which parts of IL and MO Ameren actually serves.  I cannot find this info on the Ameren website, and don't myself have time right now to dig further. Acwilson9 (talk) 00:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service area?
Talk:American lager

message: There are good and bad examples of every style.  This style should not be penalized because many examples are meant to be cheaper beers.  The style of beer and the perception of the cheapness do not go hand in hand.  One may not like Blegian beers or bitters but one would not say so many negative things about the style because they are respected in the beer world.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.20.226 (talk) 14:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too negative 

message: Using adjuncts is not always cheaper, it was initally done because the american barley was too strong and became the flavor the american beer drinker was looking for.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.20.226 (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjuncts
Talk:American Aviation

message: The article has multiple issues regarding content and referencing. FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What needs fixing at this point in time? - Ahunt (talk) 13:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have had a tidy up and removed loads of multiple references, I have tried to follow a time line rather than a rambling collection of facts. Sorry if I cut a bit deep but please add anything of importance but perhaps not with loads of references, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 21:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision needed
Talk:American Axle

message: In the 2008 Strike section Citation #3 doesn't support the entire assertion that "The strike cost General Motors $2.6 billion as the automaker lost the production of its Chevrolet Malibu sedan and other vehicles".  Due to the strike, *AAM* may have lost the contract to produce certain components but GM did and does still produce the Malibu.  Current wording is grossly misleading.
Guy48065 (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent history wrong
Talk:American Cyanamid

message: searching for cyclacort with aqutain   , devoloped by dr. vorhees at M.S.U. dermotology dept in 1986 last i purchested was 1994 and can't find now  plese help if you can   tl8674@ameritech.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.234.149.201 (talk) 02:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cyclacort 

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*West Virginia Willow Island Women Paid the Price of Fetal Protection Policies
--Stone (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Willow island incident

message: This was a company with it's own history and should not be redirecting to Wyeth. RichardBond (talk) 18:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Home Products
Talk:American Freightways

message: Does anyone know of a hotel he built? Conotate (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel
Talk:American National Insurance Company

message: An interesting angle on ANICO was its ties to the Maceos during the Free State era of Galveston. Through what was apparently their influence the company became involved in financing development on the Vegas strip back when it was the mob doing the investing. I added a small blurb on this. So far I have only found some small mention of this history in literature but if anybody has more detailed sources out there I think there is more that can be discussed in this article.
Of course, the article needs more detail in a lot of areas at this point ...
--Mcorazao (talk) 16:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mob connections 

message: How can I find out if I have a policy through this company? I cannot find a policy but I have a bank draft for 5 201 every month please help. 151.132.105.62 (talk) 12:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but this is the wrong place to ask. This page is for discussing changes to the article. There is a website listed in the article, though. Station1 (talk) 20:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policy
Talk:American Superconductor

message: I have started a stub section (with one citation) on the recent commitment of DOE funds.  Looks like $4.8M for superconducting cables (in that source).  Here is one more source that indicates it includes "a grant for $7.6 million to develop advanced technology to restrict power surges and protect the grid", for a total of "$12.4M In Govt Smart-Grid Funds".  Source:  Wall Stree Journal:  http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090720-710741.html
I will leave it for any other interested editor to update the section with more info. N2e (talk) 16:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 DOE funding

message: 2011 lawsuit with Sinovel Wind Group Company, #2 turbine manufacturer in the world and largest in PRC .   99.112.213.89 (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add 2011 lawsuit with Sinovel Wind Group Company, 

message: See above. The story gets even better:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-great-brain-robbery-china-cyber-espionage/ Zezen (talk) 06:52, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on Chinese espionage
Talk:American Urban Radio Networks

message: Some of the statements in this article are difficult to quantify - what is "urban broadcasting" and is there an actual statistic proving that this network produces more of it than comparable broadcasters? This whole stub also sounds like it was ripped directly from the AURN website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.212.205 (talk) 03:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: feels like an advertisement
Talk:The Isness

message: Isn't he on this? Kind of important I'd say... Malick78 (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Donovan]]?

message: I will add more to this page and sort it out including listing all artist who worked on it, Im currently working on FSOL stuff. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 19:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More 
Talk:Invesco

message: The statement about the company having 'relatively weak earnings' after the dot.com bubble is irrevelant.  All asset management firms suffered throughout that period.  The statement would only be true if it was worded: earnings were weak realtive to consumer stable companies.  While that would make it correct, it would highlight the lack of relevance. Finance-writer (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Relatively weak' compared to its own earnings (both prior to 2001/2002-ish and from 2005 onward), not to those of other companies. Additionally, I don't see why this relatively minor quibble led you to remove a lot of other useful material from the article. Gr1st (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dot.com bubble? 

message: Can people please use complete paragraphs? Also, this article is for a GENERAL AUDIENCE, what the hell is AUM? I don't speak "business".67.190.86.13 (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: @67.190.86.13 the article shows an old hq building. they have moved 2600:1700:3D93:930:4C40:8EB:6D97:E6EA (talk) 21:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Horrible Article
Talk:The Sims 2 Celebration Stuff

message: This game is as official as a game can be. It has been on several online sites, the box appeared, and there is already a bonus object to get with preordering it. It was also in a Switzerland version of the Seasons Expansion with a small description about it. This does not need to be deleted!
:I withdrew the speedy tag, as the article now provides context. The only reason I tagged it for speedy was because when I first saw it, there was just a collection of nonsensical-looking text, which provided no context to the reader as to what the subject actually is. (You and I might know that, but we must presume our readers know nothing whatsoever on the subject.) Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 04:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:A Latin Dictionary

message: I've just added a POV tag, because much of this article appears bent on demonstrating the superiority of the Liddel Scott dictionary over Lewis and Short. If it is necessary to mention its apparent superiority, the article should probably include some references for this fact, or some evidence beyond the fact that the former has been revised more often. Torgo 04:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "Lewis and Short was out of print from the mid-1960s ... in 2020, the dictionary was reprinted under a new publisher." Untrue.  I have in my possession a copy of L&S that was printed by Oxford University Press and states clearly on the copyright page "This impression 1996".  The statement needs to be either clarified (is it specific to the US?) or removed. 12:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, Oxford University Press themselves specifically mention that they reprinted Lewis & Short in 2002 ( https://www.oxfordscholarlyeditions.com/fileasset/assets/files/Oxford%20Latin%20Dictionary%20A%20Historical%20Introduction.pdf ).  I'll delete from the article the bit about it being out of print until 2020.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.125.246 (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of Print
Talk:Anderson (automobile)

message: Suggesting the addition of the following article on the Anderson Automobile Co. under References. (I am an editor with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, which published the article in its magazine, Econ Focus.)
* “When a South Carolina City Tried to Become Motor City” Econ Focus, Fourth Quarter 2018
7/19/2020 update: My new user name is EditorMax of RichmondFR.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorMax of RichmondFR (talk • contribs) 02:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Altamel (talk) 22:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Amaggi Group

message: Does these Group use Genetic engineering? What do you know? --217.232.116.57 (talk) 02:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Just ask Marina Silva. The governor of the state of Mato Grosso is Blairo Maggi and he even has his new laws now! Watch We Feed the World --Sei Shonagon (talk) 00:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Founded in the 20th century? Hugo999 (talk) 23:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Founded
Talk:Andronico's

message: An image used in this article, , has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Shizhao for the following reason: In category Media missing permission as of 5 April 2011; no permission
;What should I do?
You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Andronicos Community Markets.jpg Deleted
Talk:Andy's Frozen Custard

message: Insert formula here
I took out, yep. 
"Andy's is about the seventh or eight best place to buy frozen treats in a given town, so if you are willing to settle for something far from the best you could be getting, and would like to pay far too much, head over to Andy's." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.74.85.162 (talk) 04:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  took out 
Talk:Angiotech Pharmaceuticals

message: , are you able to help establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Annie's Homegrown

message: This page reads like an advertisement.  I love Annie's products, but the wiki site shouldn't be telling me why i should.
:I entirely agree. A fan of Annie's -- that's how I arrived here -- but if this is to stay it needs some work. I began wikification of the first paragraph, but am pressed on time. Joe 00:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anomalous propagation

message: Shall the page be merged with Non-line-of-sight propagation?
212.188.109.8 (talk) 20:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Atmospheric duct is just a stub and in any case that notion is just a special case of anomalous propagation in the Earth atmosphere. So a merge seems the best way to deal with it.
Pierre cb (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Atmospheric duct into this article 

message: I've added "Anaprop" to the article so people searching Wiki for this will find the correct article.
I though about doing a redirect as well.
However, I don't know/don't have time to figure out how to cite the reference:
Target Detection by Marine Radar, John Briggs, 0 86341 359 5, 978-0-86341-359-9
Can somebody do this or explain?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrf (talk • contribs) 09:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but it is Anoprop. Pierre cb (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: <years later>  I found slightly more Google books hits for "anaprop" than for "anoprop", but both spellings seem to be used. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anaprop 
Talk:J. G. Anschütz

message: Strikes me that the big list of guns they make almost violates WP:NOTCATALOG, considering it's just a big old list of a bunch of probably non-notable firearms they make. I tagged the article as needing cleanup as I feel this is a rather troubling problem. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of guns