lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anah

message: Anah and Annah seem to be the same. Merge? -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Annah 

message: Is usually fine but this passage
:Ammianuslib. 24, c. 2. calls it a munimentum, Theophylactus Simocattaiv. 10, v. 1, 2. to 'Anathon frourion, Zosimusiii. 14. a frourion, opp. Fathusai, which may be the Beth(th) ina of Ptolemy (v. 19).Steph. Byz. (sub Turos) says that Arrian calls Anatha Turos. 
needs to have all of the Latin and transliterated Greek translated and explained prior to inclusion. — LlywelynII 04:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: EB cut-and-paste

message: * Carl Ritter, Erdkunde von Asien, vii. b., pp. 716– 726 (1844)
 — LlywelynII 05:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for article expansion
Talk:Adkins v. Children's Hospital

message: Wrong Amendment?
Wasn't the liberty of contract that was validated by this case established 
under the  Fourteenth amendment not the Fifth?
:The Due Process Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment is at issue when the actions of state governments are; the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause applies to actions of the federal government.  As this case involved Washington, D.C., the Fifth Amendment is therefore the relevant one and the one that was cited in the case.  Postdlf 16:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish

message: The reason why this case doesn't really signal a change in "commerce clause" jurisprudence is that it upheld STATE, not CONGRESSIONAL legislation. This means there would be no reason to mention the "commerce clause," that portion of the enumerated rights under Article 1, Sect. 8 of the Constitution dealing with Congress' right to regulate INTERSTATE commerce. What this case did signal was a willingness to break from the laissez-faire model promoted by "The Four Horsemen of Reaction," and State's rights to curtail the liberty of contract, justified by their police powers, to promote legitimate state interests. Since this type of legislation (minimum wage), was of the same variety as much New Deal legislation, West Coast Hotel hinted that such deference might be granted to similar Congressional legislation (i.e. New Deal Legislation) which WOULD require the commerce clause as justification.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgroh531 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  STATE case =

message: How exactly did this decision signal "an expansion of Commerce Clause jurisprudence"? As far as I can see there is no relation at all. —suriv (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commerce Clause 

message: Suriv, your question is legit.  The decision did indeed signal an expansion of the Commerce Clasue".  More importantly, though, this was the decision that ended the Lochner era (a product of this was the expansion of the Commerce Clause).  The case's relation to the Lochner Era is the reason it's important and it's not even mentioned here.  Would someone be willing to do this? (refrence to the stitch in time that saved nine would also be nice)Piratejosh85 (talk) 02:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs vital info!

message: The question is how, by any stretch of the imagination, do we get to the notion that the constitution does not restrict the states' right to impair contract without completely ignoring Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which explicitly reads that the states may not pass any law which impairs the obligation of contracts? Rather, it seems here, given the text of the constitution, that Hugues, J. opinion is plainly incorrect about the constitutional text itself, with the rest of the majority opinions' argument of sorts sliding down the drain pipe by reason of being implicitly illogical given the constitutional text, unless there's some other opinion that addresses the obvious implication there.  98.178.191.34 (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Without addressing your question specifically, it should shock no one that the Supreme Court is neither consistent nor logically sound. You are sure to find law review articles making the point you raise which could be incorporated into a criticism section. Muttnik talk 21:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2022 Needs more discussion in the article for reasonable congruity to the constitutional text
Talk:Reynolds v. Sims

message: This article would be improved with a reference to who Reynolds and Sims actually were. 35.10.230.213 14:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Party Identities

message: A redirect would be useful for this page, as many other court cases (Gideon v. Wainwright, Engel v. Vitale, etc) have redirects if the exact article name isn't typed in the search. I would add one, but I don't know how to do that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.77.111.193 (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect

message: Not mentioned in the article. Seems pertinent. DemonDays64 (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Surprisingly difficult to chase down, but added. PianoDan (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was Reynolds, who was Sims? 

message: The Federal government was a creation of the state legislatures.
The original intent of the United States Constitution was that Senators would represent their state legislatures, and representatives would represent the people of the state. That was changed by Amendment XVII.
Almost all state constitutions were written before Amendment XVII. The constitutions of many bicameral states were based upon the same principle, writ small: State Senators would represent a county coumcil or county board of supervisors or whatever the state called the county governmental entity, and members of the state assembly would represent the people of the state in their legislature.
Had the Warren court read this history, Earl Warren might have written that Senators don't represent counties, instead of "acres or trees."
At both the Federal and State level, having different structures, one of people's representatives, and one of the representatives of the next smaller governing body, were designed to curb mobocracy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.229.160.187 (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of history would be helpful
Talk:Hartman v. Moore

message: The article is not clear how the original lawsuit was resolved. How did the Supreme Courts majority ruling that "in order to prove that the prosecution was caused by a retaliatory motive, the plaintiff bringing such a claim must allege and prove that the criminal charges were brought without probable cause" effect Mr. Moore's case. The article states that prior to the case going befor the supreme court that Moore had succeded on getting his lawsuit reinstated against the postal inspectors and "FTCA claim against the United States" he was barred from suing the federal proscicutor on grounds of prosecutorial immunity. So then after the suppreme court ruling, does that mean his lawsuit was allowed to proceed or not and if so what was the outcome? Maybe I missed it but that article did not seem to be clear as whether he was able to prove in district court that there was a lack any of probable cause to charge him with a crime and thus whether his lawsuit could continue (The article seems to suggest the lawsuit had not gone to trial prior to the SCOTUS ruling). Thus, I think we need to a) clarify if his lawsuit ever went to trial and if so what the outcome of that trial was and b) How the Supreme Court ruling effected his case specifically (i.e. Had he met the supreme courts clarified standard regarding “lack of probable cause” prior to the case reaching SCOTUS and thus his lawsuit could proceed). While I understand this article focusing on the SCOTUS ruling clarifying a malicious persecution standard regarding lack of probable cause, that doesn’t preclude the article from explaining to the reader in clear terms how the original lawsuit that lead to the SCOTUS case was resolved. --Notcharliechaplin (talk) 16:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Issue the article is not clear about is how Moore’s original lawsuit was resolved (Did he win a judgment on his favor?)
Talk:Near v. Minnesota

message: I kinda think that things like Near v Minnesota should redirect to the page, and currently they do not. I would try to do that, but I'm afraid I don't know how. Ranger 1 23:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I kinda think

message: This sentence is wrong: "Note that the paragraph above cites the Fourteenth Amendment and not the First Amendment. This is because the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the First and makes it applicable to the States. As literally written, the First Amendment applies to Congress and the federal government, not the states."
Near was decided before the incorporation doctrine existed.  The Court cited the Fourteenth and not the First Amendment because deprivations of freedom of speech or press were considered a deprivation of liberty without due process,  not because they violated the First Amendment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.5.191 (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporation
Talk:Japan–North Korea Pyongyang Declaration

message: In the current developments section it states that Kim Jong-un cancelled the Pyongyang Declaration. But the source for this sentence is to an article at the Arms Control Association about US-South Korea-North Korea relations. The source article doesn't mention Japan or the Pyongyang Declaration. Is there a source that can be provided to verify that Kim Jong-un did actually cancel the Pyongyang Declaration? Many thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sykora23 (talk • contribs) 07:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 cancellation by Kim Jong-un of the Pyongyang Declaration source needed
Talk:Thiamazole

message: I cleaned up a bit, still reads like a drug information pamphlet.  added drug box, i will try to get some info from work(pharmacy) and fill it in.  if anyone can add an image of the structue, that would be good.  looks better than it did when i got here. Kennykane 05:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Is needed!
lun drug hy bhenchod'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.43.232.116 (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Tapazole is a trademark in Canada.  Are Thiamazole and MMI trademarks?  If so they should be identified as such. Peter Grey (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate names
Talk:Peter Szatmari

message: Very nice, Natche.  Be sure to include a reference for his criteria ... I think it's back on the Asperger syndrome page.  Sandy 05:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Taken care of.  --Dubhagan 05:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice work

message: Can anybody find the date of birth for Peter Szatmari It would be very helpful.Natche24 02:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I might be able to get that info, any other personal specifics on him that is needed in the article?  --Dubhagan 03:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: I believe this page should be added to a list of Hungarian-Canadians.Thomasiscool 16:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity
Template talk:Non-FIFA teams

message: This template needs some serious work. How many of these teams actually exist? This template is probably useful but it is very cluttered right now and someone ought to at least begin making stubs for teams that they can confirm exist (or existed). - RPIRED 05:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. This needs to be sourced, weeded out and cleaned up. —Nightstallion (?) 10:30, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This list seems to define its criteria as exclusion rather than inclusion.  I noticed the local cubs having a training session at the park last weekend: I'm fairly certain that they are registered with neither FIFA nor the NF Board, so should I add them?  Obviously this is flippant, but it makes the point: what are the inclusion criteria for this list?  The current list is a strange amalgam of small nations and near-independent territories, sub-national political divisions, islands, towns and ethnic groups.  Many of the entities which meet no definition of the word "nation" are listed as national teams, and there is no evidence presented in many of the articles that the team presently exists, or at any time has done so.  Kevin McE 01:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 months on, and no-body has been able or thought it fitting to provide a rationale for inclusion on the list.  For as long as this remains the case, the template list is meaningless.  Unless clear grounds for inclusion are suggested within the next two weeks, I will list it for deletion, not because I think it serves no purpose, but because it has no credibility.  Kevin McE 09:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The meaning of inclusion is the same of this page List of non-national representative teams in men's football that is about the same theme Calapez 14:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria? 

message: I have created a possible replacement template. If you are interested, please take a look here and comment on this page. Thanks Stu.W UK (talk) 03:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested replacement 

message: This team was removed as they had never competed internationally, only in internal competition against Sint Eustatius. To be a team competing internationally, you have to face international opposition. Stu.W UK (talk) 23:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saba
Talk:Space dock

message: Note: I'm not saying that this articel HAS to go, but I'm not sure two examples qualifies for a seperate articel. More, and more conventional (Earth-based) dry docks that are central to some story would help. 68.39.174.238 05:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Matrox G200

message: Re: "Mystake".   Yes, thanks for that.  I didn't realise that there was more than one version of the Mystake.  Perhaps if and when you put up a page about the earlier version, you could give some explanation of why it was called the "Mystake".  Thanks.
:I'm going to put together an article on the older pre-G200 Mystiques one of these days. I need to do some research beforehand though. I have the cards in a drawer here, so it's just a matter of time!
:Basically the reason the old cards were called the "Mystake" by some was that their 3D acceleration lacked many important features and that caused them to have very ugly image quality. They left out transparency support and bilinear texture filtering, for example. Performance was actually not bad though, a lot better than ViRGE (but a lot slower than Voodoo Graphics). For 2D they are not far behind MGA Millennium, and that is nothing to complain about. They weren't bad cards, but they definitely were not ground breaking in any way. Except in that they were Matrox's first Direct3D-capable cards. They were really cost-reduced Millenniums (no WRAM) with much more robust 3D, relative to Millennium. --Swaaye 05:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mystique

message: Do we have a picture of the 8 MB SGRAM upgrade module for the G200? Those were quite rare apparently. 2fort5r (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SGRAM

message: Half this article reads like it was written by a marketing department.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.154.251 (talk) 14:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reads like marketing copy 

message: This article is filled with bombastic manager-speak, ie. "significant player", "high-end", "excellent", "excelled" and "innovate", and this is only the very first paragraph of the article.  I'm almost disappointed they didn't mention how this company leveraged their synergies with manageable and scalable enterprise Java-based solutions(tm).  Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 07:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manager speak
Talk:Nitya Chaitanya Yati

message: In my opinion, the article should be titled as "Nitya Chaitanya Yati" and not Nityachaitanya Yati.
See this: http://www.narayanagurukula.org/Pages/nitya.html
Although the embedded space makes little difference in Malayalam, in English, it is an entirely different story. It would be better if someone - the creator of this article perhaps-can create an article as "Nitya Chaitanya Yati" and shift the entire content to that one.
Sandeepmdas 12:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I need help uploading a picture of Guru   http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guru_Nitya_in_his_study_at_Ooty_Gurukula.jpg to the article.  I am just learning Wiki mark-up language.  To begin with I uploaded an image of him from my computer to the Wiki Commons.  We've obtained permission from the photographer, Sumner Walters, to use the image.  I stated this in the upload process.  The B/Wimage I want to upload is available at: 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guru_Nitya_in_his_study_at_Ooty_Gurukula.jpg
Can someone help me upload this image?  I really want to improve the article.  I've read through the tutorials and tried to correctly modify the sample Wiki markup language given here        
I would really appreciate any help.  Thanks mucho.  PeterMoras (talk) 06:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to upload a file image to our article on Guru Nitya  
Talk:Le Roman de Silence

message: There is another book of this title.  It is a translation of Chinmoku, by Shusaku Endo, and is considered his most famous work.  The Jade Knight 05:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried to indent the synopsis portion and could not figure out how to do it. I think it would look more finished if someone could make that change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.187.182.176 (talk) 06:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: indentation of synopsis

message: The article is well-written, and includes many important points about the text’s portrayal of nature and nurture. However, I found it to be lacking sources to back up some of its claims. For instance, in the “Themes/motifs” section, the line “This is because of the importance of appearance and the assumed ubiquity of honesty in this era,” is stated without any source referencing to if this statement is true about the Medieval Era, and how it is substantiated. KSantana11 (talk) 20:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback 

message: Here's a summary: https://books.google.com/books?id=5OtX2hXo1csC&pg=PA23 5.173.96.84 (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article fails to mention this is either based or included on chapter from the Vulgate Cycle
Talk:East Finchley tube station

message: I have a picture of the station name, I think.
--Blue icicle (talk • contribs) 05:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comment

message: I have doubts about Jerry Springer being born in East Finchley station. The article on Jerry Springer cites this source claiming that his mother was using the station as an air raid shelter. Being above ground, East Finchley does not seem ideal as a shelter. Mtford 00:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerry Springer's birthplace 
Talk:Rhymesayers Entertainment

message: I think it is important to mention in this article the reasons that the artists Prof and Dem Atlas were dropped from this label in 2020 was because of sexual abuse accusations. I recognize that I cannot be impartial on this subject so I will leave this note and references here for another editor. Terasaface (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In other news, RSE did close their store Fifth Element and cancel Soundset in 2020 - if anyone is looking to add to this page. 
 requesting edits regarding the above comment. Terasaface (talk) 16:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dropping Prof and Dem Atlas

message: The list of artists that was presented until my recent delete was large and likely to grow larger. I'm not going to trawl through each of them to ensure that they comply with WP:BAND but would suggest that someone does. Wikipedia is not a list etc (WP:NOTDIR). Please can you provide citations for their notability in accordance with WP:BAND. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My big delete 

message: Rhymesayers Pictures was a motion picture production company and a distributor founded in 1979 by Hatuey de Camps. Its divisions included Rhymesayers Entertainment.--2600:1702:4B28:F760:15A7:BEC2:1D91:F325 (talk) 07:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: A Dominican politician didn't found a company division for a company that didn't exist until 1995. Stop pushing hoaxes. Nate • (chatter) 22:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhymesayers Pictures
Template talk:Over-quotation

message: Is there a way to tag sections that are just a random list of quotes? --Deutschgirl (talk) 06:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Put this tag on them? — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 10:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagging sections
Talk:Izumita Station

message: The infobox and category say the station opened in 1903, but the text says it opened in 1913.  Since neither the infobox nor the text has a citation, there is no indication as to which is the correct year.  Is there a handy reference that can resolve this question? Slambo (Speak) 14:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 1913 is correct per JR East. --MChew (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open in 1903 or 1913?
Talk:Ge Hong

message: Done. I've added some Ge Hong images. If someone wants to rearrange them, please tweak away. Thanks. Keahapana (talk) 00:16, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request photo

message: This article is copied word-for-word from a draft by Matthew Wells for “Self as Historical Artifact: Ge Hong and Early Chinese Autobiographical Writing,” EMC 9(2003):71-104. The Revision History on 10 September 2005 shows this copyvio came from an anonymous IP, was deleted by User:Drini, and reverted. What should we do? Delete everything? Keep and revise some material? Keahapana (talk) 21:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted it. There are enough sources still listed to write a new version, but rewriting someone's paper won't work. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 
Talk:Woolworths Supermarkets

message: The first Big W was in Jesmond, Newcastle, NSW. opened 1964.
Tamworth might have been first in a project of expansion they began in mid70's...
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/105759118?searchTerm=%22big%20W%22%20woolworths%20jesmond
27.96.199.11 (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Jack Duckworth

message: In Response to: It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Vera_Duckworth. (Discuss)
I disagree. Two totally different characters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomDan (talk • contribs) 
Oppose: Two completely different characters. LBM 22:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: well vera appeard in 1974 so jack should be down as 1974 NOT 1979 as his first appered in November 28th 1974.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 21:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1974 

message: *
*RAIN*the*ONE BAM 05:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Gordon Willey

message: Willey wrote a well-received but not widely sold novel, Selena, as well as musicals and plays (瑨灴⼺眯睷渮灡攮畤爯慥楤杮潲浯瀮灨房潯㵫楢浯浥♳慰敧朽楷汬祥栮浴l聍⛔Ɇ),  Is this worth including in the article?Kdammers (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel 
Talk:FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup

message: :I moved this page to its new title. For discussion, go to Talk:FIFA#Rebranding_of_championships. --Gabbec 06:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: The notice is given by many journals but it seems not to have yet an officiallity in the web. When it will probably given, the source can be replaced by the FIFA's official agency press.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 postposition