lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David McCann (cyclist)

message: Is he actually a member of the ride team or was that just one race?
User: Phil_Nolte 19th August 2009 20:13 (UTC)
:He is registered as a team member on the UCI website. SeveroTC 19:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ride Team
Talk:MKT Trail

message: It runs from Clinton to Machens, with some of the most popular stops at Sedalia, Boonville, Rocheport, Columbia, Jefferson City, and St. Charles. Between Boonville and St. Charles, it runs almost parallel to the Missouri River.
I recently posted that on the article, but realized it was contradicted by the rest of the article and removed it.  Is the MKT specifically the portion of the trail in Missouri? I thought it was the trail in general.Ninja! 00:03, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I just answered my own question.  Sorry for not doing my homework.Ninja! 00:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the MKT specific?
Talk:Saucier v. Katz

message: I guess I need to read up on the 'normal' format of the Supreme Court pages, but are the actual dimensions of the cloth banner employed by Mr. Katz really encyclopedic knowledge? Seems a bit over the top to me - I couldn't care less if it were 4 or 3 feet wide.Mfhulskemper (talk) 01:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Acanthopteroctetidae

message: The current infraorder listed in the article is Acanthoctesia, however both Glossata and  do not list Acanthoctesia as a possible infraorder of Glossata.  Perhaps these two pages should be updated with Acanthoctesia.   says it's legitimate.  The current articles say that Acanthopteroctetidae is part of Dacnonypha, which redirects to Eriocraniidae for some reason. --Notmyhandle (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infraorder conflict: Dacnonypha versus Acanthoctesia
Talk:Gemasolar Thermosolar Plant

message: This article seems to go to infuriating lengths to avoid ACTUALLY NAMING the power plant it's about. There can't be many Spanish solar power towers, so it seems very likely to be this one. Still, rather than make the assumption and add possibly incorrect information to the article, I'm leaving the link here in the hope that someone can confirm that it's the same tower. - Ben Ram 09:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC News article - but is it Solar Tres? 

message: The links to the solartres project are not working, and there are duplications of the link. -- Jonas 12:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links 

message: this article says "the border between the regions of Andalusia and Extremadura".  While this article states it's in Almería, Spain. -- Roidroid 07:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be neither - according to this, the location is west of Écija in Andalusia. Gralo 15:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  where is it? 

message: The first reference say about 17 MW power. Why is writed 15 MW in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.114.253.171 (talk) 15:42, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The effective power of the plant 

message: Hi, it seems that the power plant is up and working. Also the plant characteristics need minor updates.--Nubifer (talk) 13:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gemasolar plant (Solar Tres) is officially commissioned  

message: Because if ever there was a need, here it is. Or is it really the PS10 solar power plant that goes by Gemasolar power plant? 
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-gemasolar-solar-thermal-power-hours.htmlFX (talk) 02:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not much; use the "move" button. But what should it be called? Gemasolar CSP electrical plant? William M. Connolley (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it take to rename an entry? 
Talk:Kingdoms of Sunda

message: VivioFateFan wrote: It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Kingdoms of Sunda.
:Thank you very much for your suggestion, my firend.
:I am an opinion that the main article of Sunda kingdom must be in http://en.wikipedia/Sunda_kingdom instead of in http://en.wikipedia/Kingdoms_of_Sunda. Kingdoms of Sunda page should have contained a resume of the Sundanese kingdoms.
:Beside that, old Sunda page link (main link to Sunda kingdom) has been filled with unsuitable content as follow:
:Sunda may refer to:
# Sunda Islands, a group of islands in the western part of the Malay archipelago 
# Greater Sunda Islands 
# Lesser Sunda Islands 
# Sunda Strait, the strait between Java and Sumatra 
# Sunda Shelf, part of the continental shelf of Southeast Asia, covered by the South China Sea which isolates islands such as # Borneo, Sumatra and Java 
# Sundaland, a biogeographical region of Southeastern Asia that comprises the Malay Peninsula and the Malay Archipelago islands west of the Wallace Line 
# Kingdom of Sunda, a kingdom that existed in west part of Java from the 7th century to the 16th century 
# Sunda edition of Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSundanese people, an ethnic group in the western part of Java, and a second biggest ethnic group in Indonesia after the Javanese 
# Sundanese language, the language of the Sundanese 
# Sundanese script 
# Kidung Sunda, a literary work that recounts the story of the "Battle of Bubat" between Sundanese and Javanese 
# Sunda (clan), a clan (gotra) of Jats in India 
# Sunda (asura), an asura brother of Upasunda 
# "Sunda", a fictional country in Eric Ambler's thriller "State of Siege" [1] 
So, I think we need to provide a space for Sunda kingdom.
I think you will agree with my opinion.
:Best regards, --Serayu 09:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Best regards, --Serayu 09:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments
Talk:Neerim North, Victoria

message: Jack Lockett (my father) alway's called Neerim North,God's own country. We were alway's last to go dry & the first come back green. Not a bad address this,it can get a bit cold & cruel,but we are at the foot of Mt Baw Baw. My Dad always maintained that we were the highest point between Mt Worth & Mt Baw Baw. The high rainfall & red soil provide brilliant brillant dairying & potatoe country. The primary school was closed at the end of 1975. Now,the schoolgrounds are the H.F McCay arboretum. Opposite the schoolgrounds is the war memorial,that those born in & enlisted in Neerim North are remembered on a bluestone memorial. This is the site of the of the Neerim North Soldier's Memerial Hall. The hall was dismanted in 1981,so the memorial was erected. I was born here,i work here on the family farm. In the spring we milk 400 cows and get serious production out of them. I love Neerim North,the wonderful secuded place that it is. Lindsay Lockett  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.53.134.33 (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rawson, Victoria

message: I not entirely sure if Rawson is considered West Gippsland or Central Gippsland.  I added it to the Template:Towns in West Gippsland when I created the template. If I'm wrong, just let me know and I'll fix it up.  Cheers. Slabba 01:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Gippsland?
Talk:Stratford Works

message: There is a disagreement about dates between the photo and the article.  Can anyone resolve this? Biscuittin 09:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

message: In the section "Facilites at grouping (1921)" it states
:An account of working in the works written by A. James can be found in the Great Eastern Railway Society Journal No. 33 page 20.  -but that doesn't seem to match the index of the journal eg here http://www.gersociety.org.uk/index.php/home/journal
Can someone fix this please.Prof.Haddock (talk) 03:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you - I've removed it now because it was a duplicate - already mentioned in the sources Stratford_Works#Sources as:
**
Prof.Haddock (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Society journal

message: I wonder if it could be made clearer which was which/and where each one was? There does seem to be a bit of duplication, too. Turini2 (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Stratford TMD]] versus [[Stratford Works]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Stratford TMD § Stratford Works and TMD both need work.  Turini2 (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:Stratford TMD#Stratford Works and TMD both need work|Talk:Stratford TMD §&nbsp;Stratford Works and TMD both need work]]
Talk:New Zealand Youth Parliament

message: I recently updated and expanded this article, as well as doing some reworking and restructuring. I still need to add details on Youth MPs for the 2010 and 2013 Youth Parliament's, however have not done this yet as it takes some time to transfer the names from a source to a table. If anyone else would like to, feel free! Otherwise I will do it in a few days. TheNZCactus (talk) 09:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now completed the Youth MP details, so this is no longer needing completion. TheNZCactus (talk) 08:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Article
Talk:M. M. Buckner

message: Page carries no advertising, podcast is free. No reason to see this as commerical linkspam, agree? Dmanning 09:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: libsyn
Talk:Battle of Arachova

message: I made all my changes for historical accuracy. The five-pointed-star flag was used after 1844. Read the information in Flags of the Ottoman Empire: "The five pointed star did not appear until the 1840s." (Marshall, Tim (2017-07-04). A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-5011-6833-8.) The star and crescent flag was never used in the 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th and 17th centuries, and most of the 18th century. "...the flag was defined as red by decree in 1793 and an eight-pointed star was added." (Publishing, D. K. (2009-01-06). Complete Flags of the World. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-7566-5486-3. Marshall, Tim (2017-07-04). A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-5011-6833-8.) Also about the Ottoman red flag: "According to Rıza Nur, sultan Selim I (1512-20) had a white personal flag, while the Ottoman Army flag was red (kızıl bayrak). During Süleyman I's reign (1520-66) the janissaries had a white flag while the timariot cavalry had a red flag. It was used as the Ottoman civic and merchant flag from 1793 to 1923." (Jane Hathaway (1 February 2012) A Tale of Two Factions: Myth, Memory, and Identity in Ottoman Egypt and Yemen, SUNY Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-8610-8) - Aybeg (talk) 06:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical accuracy of the Ottoman flag (The five-pointed star didn't appear until the 1840s)
Talk:The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals

message: The absence of in-line sources for most of this article is deplorable. There are far too many unsupported evaluative statements (=POV), which might be copyright violations or soapboxing by a contributor. Hence flag. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: At last count this totaled over 40 names and references, some of which are mentioned in the text (and don't need reiterating) and others of which appear tangential. Someone will need to pare this list down quite a bit. MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'See also' section 

message: The article has failed to give a clear idea of what Darwin wrote and argued in the book. It diverts too often into long discussions of Darwin's life & career (which have already been covered in this wiki almost ad nauseam). What the reader wants to see on this page is a summary of Darwin's presented facts and arguments on the special topic of the book. A certain amount of assessment as to how these ideas stand up today would be acceptable also. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've taken an axe to quite a bit of the rambling, and have split off "Illustrations" and "Publication" sections. There is a clear gap for a "Reception" section (for reviews, with citations). The description of the book itself needs expanding. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stick to the book!
Talk:Grímur Kamban

message: He may have been a Faroese 'founding father', but he was also a Norwegian, and projecting the modern national divisions onto the Norse names is artificial anyway, so the specifically Faroese form with -ur is not justified.--77.85.55.14 (talk) 05:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing a renaming to Grímr Kamban
Talk:Clit wank

message: I've just changed the cleanup tag to a dipsuted one.  I can't find the term on Google.  It may be slang from a relatively small linguistic group.  In which case it shouldn't be here.  We should wait a while (until June 2007) and if nobody has found a single reference, replace the page with a redirect to non-penetrative sex. --Simon Speed 10:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Has anyone heard of this term?
Talk:King Edward VI School, Lichfield

message: Two IP addresses keep adding potentially libelous content. I can find no independent verification for the content. If this is factual, please provide independent references. Also consider whether it is legal to include named individuals. Jschwa1 11:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially libelous content 

message: Please read this page Wikipedia:Wikipedia in brief before adding potentially libellous content which does not represent a neutral point of view, one of the key principles of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a forum for making allegations of illegal activity, however well intentioned.
You clearly have strong views on the allegations you are making. Can I suggest the following action:
* If you were involved in these events and believe illegal activity happened which has not been investigated by the police, then consider raising the matter with the police.
* If these alleged events have been investigated by police and tried and proved in a court of law then consider adding content which conforms to the NPOV guidelines for Wikipedia. You will also need to ensure that any content is verifiable.
As a courtesy for other editors on Wikipedia, please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Jschwa1 11:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia conventions 

message: You can't verify the content because you are not able to look in the right place. This is an accurate historical record by witnesses. As unpalatable as it may be, it is a part of the school's history and it is in the public interest that these issues are examined. The cat, as it were, is out of the bag and you can't put it back in. 
As for naming individuals, it is high time that this was done. Perhaps it is time to name and shame more of the individuals concerned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.0.128.56 (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truthful statements cannot be libelous 

message: The quality of English used in this article is very poor and consequently brings the school into disrepute. Is there no-one in the school, whether student or teacher, who is capable of reworking it to a high standard?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.126.162 (talk) 21:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article brings the school into disrepute 

message: The 'former pupils' category associated with this school has nominated for renaming, along with all similar categories. Comments are invited at the categories' entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories for discussion: nomination of various 'Former pupils' categories
Template talk:New South Wales Representatives

message: Using text on background colours like this is generally not a good idea from an accessibility point of view. In this case, I don't think it looks good even without considering readability. JPD (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is surely better for readability than having (ALP) or (LIB) after every single name? I agree that it doesn't look fabulous but I certainly think it looks better than having abbreviations after every name. Frickeg 00:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Colours might be less intrusive than abbreviations in one sense, but they can reduce the reader's ability to make out the text in the first place. What about something like the format in ? JPD (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think JPD's idea is much better. That is the standard way of segmenting templated lists on Wikipedia. Remy B 00:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good idea. Frickeg 21:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colours
Talk:SPARK Museum of Electrical Invention

message: The link "History of the Spark Museum" (https://www.sparkmuseum.org/about-us/) is broken. 
 The "About Spark" (https://www.sparkmuseum.org/aboutspark/) page may be the closest one today.
-r RichMorin (talk) 00:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link
Talk:Barnfield, Luton

message: Does anyone know a little of the background ans history of the Barnfield area. Does the name give away more of the agricultural history of Luton, in that the name comes simply from a field and a barn? or does it have more meaning?--GazMan7 11:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the name?
Talk:Judicial Appointments Commission

message: It'd be welcome if someone with sufficient knowledge of this commission could expand upon it and of course offer reasons why the new commission was seen as important over the structure of the old system. I personally do not possess adequate knowledge, otherwise I'd take a stab at it.Nja247 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition

message: In other words, how are the members of the Commission themselves selected?  Grover cleveland (talk) 06:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Who appoints the appointers?
Talk:Association for Biblical Higher Education

message: Is the Trinity College case representative of the whole? Although the standards are certainly different for ABHE and regional accreditation agencies, I have heard of many cases where ABHE colleges have been accepted for regional accreditation with few difficulties. If the Trinity College event is not representative of the whole, then I suggest that we make this clear and, perhaps, provide a counter-example. Since I currently attend a Bible College I am certainly biased in favor of Bible Colleges. It seems to me, however, that having the Trinity College note on the page is biased in the other direction. Perhaps we can balance each other out? 
--DatraxMada 11:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Compared
Talk:Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd

message: It doesn't seem that the "Wagon Mound" was ever renamed to Lucky Lady (per http://www.aukevisser.nl/t2tanker/id228.htm), so maybe the photo doesn't match? A better photo might be http://s223.photobucket.com/albums/dd188/bulkers/T2-Part%202/?action=view¤t=WagonMound.jpg, if it has a clear copyright.
Acabre (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Condor of Cornwall

message: I tried to find Cornwall in Prosopography of Medieval Lands  but this was a failure.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 02:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prosopography of Medieval Lands 

message: It looks like most of the sources given have him primarily under the name Condor. Would anyone object if I moved the page to Condor of Cornwall (over the existing redirect), and created a new article for his son under this name? ‑‑YodinT 12:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: With no objections, I've started a move request below. ‑‑YodinT 16:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name: Cadoc or Condor? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cadoc of Cornwall →  – The sources that I've come across give Condor (alternatively Condurus/Candor/etc.) as his primary name, with Cadoc as a possible variant; his son's name is given as Cadoc (sometimes spelled Caddock etc.), with Condor II as a secondary variant. This move will free up this title for an article on his son, while distinguishing the two using their most frequently used WP:COMMONNAMEs. ‑‑YodinT 15:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 April 2022 

message: The earliest sources we've got are by Camden and Carew, who say they're working from recent sources:
* Camden: "[Condor] is accounted by the late writers, the last Earle of Cornwall"; "they which are skilfull in Heraldry, have a tradition"
* Carew: "This note I borrowed out of an industrious collection, which setteth downe all the noble mens creations, Armes, and principall descents, in euery Kings dayes since the conquest"
One suggestion is that this could be the records of the heraldic visitations which travelled the country from 1530 to 1688, requiring the nobility to set out their claims to heraldry and titles. It does seem a plausible explanation for why Condor appears at around this time (either as a genuine tradition, or an invention). I haven't been able to find any mentions of Condor/Cadoc or any of the variant spellings in either of the two published editions of the Cornwall visitations (Vivian 1874 and Vivian 1887) or Devon (Vivian 1895), but these could well be edited down versions of the original manuscripts (they don't seem to generally go back as far as "euery Kings dayes since the conquest"), possibly not based on the "originals with signatures" and "office copies", or any "church notes", etc. All that said, there don't seem to be any reliable sources that cover this yet, so there's nothing to add to the article until something's published on it. ‑‑YodinT 12:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original sources
Talk:Allied war crimes during World War II

message: Why is this even in the article? Isn't this pretty disrepectful to victims of the Holocaust and in other war crimes? I'm struggling to understand it. 2607:FB91:148B:4AED:AC39:6AF7:4FFC:66F1 (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Holocaust denial references 

message: Much of this article seems to be WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. There seem to be few references to primary and secondary sources in some official authority that have determined certain acts of war to be war crimes. ♆ CUSH ♆ 19:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this article based on? 

message: Why is Dresden included? im pretty sure that multiple sources say that it was, indeed, an valid military target. 187.39.133.201 (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, id say we get an moderator or someone here and actually do something, i see a lot of information with unreliable or missing sources, this article really needs major rework, and i cant do everything alone. 187.39.133.201 (talk) 22:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I always thought Dresden was part of total war. 95.151.194.20 (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

text: I just deleted Dresden from this article. 95.151.194.20 (talk) 17:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dresden