lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CBC News

message: This page hardly has any verification to the information on the article. Would someone find verification please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spyrokid77666 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreeing with the lack of verification, much of the information was not cited or verified. For example, the first paragraph does not have a citation as to the fact that CBC News was founded in 1941. Also, there may be some bias surrounding some of the sources as some are created by news outlets such as Huffington Post. Frmjenn (talk) 01:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The lede (also spelled lead) section is not required to have any references. All of its content should be supported in the article. See :MOS:LEAD. The founding date is not currently supported in the article, and I'm not sure if it ever was. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been a problem for a decade. I've now tagged the problematic sentences. Walter deleted the tags, without proper reason. I therefore reverted. If this continues, I will consider instead deleting the non-referenced material per our rules. We are not a collection of uncited text - that is not how wp works. 2603:7000:2143:8500:A0EC:BE1B:EA2A:45AD (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He has now - without reason/edit summary, reverted my tags once again. Can someone suggest an admin who might help here? User:Spilia4, User:Aquillion, User:GorillaWarfare? 2603:7000:2143:8500:A0EC:BE1B:EA2A:45AD (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Verification 

message: claimed that there is a discussion about these drive-by taggings. I see no such discussion and these are :WP:BLUE issues that were tagged. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See above. From looking at the tags, these are not WP:BLUE issues at all. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you GW. --2603:7000:2143:8500:A0EC:BE1B:EA2A:45AD (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GorillaWarfare supposed discussion 

message: I noticed obvious issues with the article yesterday so have edited it, but only read the talk page archives today to see if a previous discussion happened.  There was a previous discussion so I'll add more information explaining my changes.
* Other parties were also sued for copyright, cherry picking the conservative party for a long paragraph is undue.
* If there's something to report about the conservative party trying to shut down CBC, that's what WP should report and it possibly doesn't belong in that section.
* There was mention of personal criticism but when reading independent sources about it one can easily determine that CBC is not the problem.  WP would then report about that rather than promoting the person's claims and that's undue as well a disservice to the person anyway.
I would even suggest merging the section into a single paragraph, considering that what remains is a general impression of public opinion.  —PaleoNeonate – 15:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of bias
Talk:Italian ironclad Enrico Dandolo

message: this has details (and a nice line drawing) on the reconstruction. Parsecboy (talk) 11:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: this has details for 1902. Parsecboy (talk) 11:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This has details on the reconstruction. Parsecboy (talk) 00:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Save for later 

message: here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Another here. Parsecboy (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:ImagineAir

message: This article really needs some third party refs, as so far it looks like  spam article on a non-notable company. Unless anyone can add some good third party refs I'll nominate it for deletion in a week or two. - Ahunt (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I found two reasonable third party refs so the tags were removed. There is still a need for further refs to allow removing the remaining tags. - Ahunt (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article
Talk:Raorchestes tinniens

message: The 2023 IUCN entry lists this frog at an elevation range of 1780 to 2465 meters above sea level and ASW lists 1700-2000.  I've put 1700 to 2465 but don't have strong feelings about it. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevation
Talk:John Gray (North Dakota politician)

message: Over the years legislation is slowly changing.Man are loosing their grip on power.The law is being radically changed to empower women who were at a disadvantaged position from the mediaval ages.
However it is duly noted that in the 21st century man are experiencing the highest level of abuse and there is no specific legislation in place to ensure their safety.
A few cases are reported but most man fear to be victimised by the law enforcement agents.
Hence they end up being suicidal.
Whats your take on this?.. Simbarashe Clancy Garagada (talk) 05:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are woman rights the new human rights?
Talk:Common tree frog

message: Common tree frog currently redirects to European tree frog (Hyla arborea) article. Shouldn't the redirect point to this article instead? Also raised the question on talk:European tree frog. MKFI (talk) 17:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the redirect and added hatnote to this article. MKFI (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common tree frog redirect 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam/Archive 5

message: Please comment here on a proposed merger or restructuring of these two articles. They currently contain a large amount of common content. Best, --Shirahadasha 21:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Holy Land]] and [[Holy Land (Biblical)]] 

message: I noted the merge tag on the main article above, and on this project's main page. Personally, based on the minimal data on the project page above, I think that this proposal would probably work best as a subproject of Islam, maybe as a Islamic (or Moslem) Culture task force. John Carter 16:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: please participate in the discussion above here --Sefringle 22:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: what is there to merge? wouldn't it be more prudent to just delete the other wikiproject? ITAQALLAH 22:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea probably. --Sefringle 23:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Muslims]] 

message: This article's name isn't the best (replacement suggestions are welcome), but the concept of ascension into heaven is important in a number of religions. Islamic thought on this should be well-represented in the article. I've tried to add information from Islamic sources, but I'm not familiar with them and I don't want to make mistakes about the nature of Islamic beliefs and scholarship on the subject. Islam, Christianity and Judaism have the most to say about the subject, and each should be well-represented in the article. There is currently a move to delete the article, and some editors seem to be calling the belief in ascension without death a "joke". It seems to me that the best response to that is to improve the article and show the concept is not treated as a joke by those who take religious questions seriously. Please take a look at the article and the deletion discussion and consider contributing to both. 
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who went to heaven alive
Noroton 19:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please see the deletion discussion for [[List of people who went to heaven alive]]
Talk:Zhangixalus achantharrhena

message: could be increased if refs or status material verifies threatened status SatuSuro 13:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:Rhacophorus barisani

message: assessed as low - threatened status needs more ref/cite - then perhaps higher status SatuSuro 13:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:Wali Mohammed Wali

message: Quite close to a B. The last paragraph about his life sounds a little too cheesy and can be rewritten. Also have corrected a few gramatical errors. Can extoll more about the social importance of Wali's poetry, Wali's inspirations etc. devil 06:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: His death details and about his grave can be added in a separate section. The breaking of his grave and building a road on it is more significant. A picture of the tarred road and its GPS location on the map also will be better. The worldwide reactions on breaking and building road can also be of more important, about how more he is remembered by the world.
HotWick (talk) 22:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Death and Grave 
Talk:Build It Bigger

message: Wow, this didn't exist until I linked it from Renegade. I like this.
Ryanjcole 00:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

message: a number of texts were removed because they were copied from Discovery's website. That's simply not possible to do when building a legal encyclopedia. Add the URL instead, and write the summary in your own words. --Alvestrand 06:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can't just copy text from others... 
Talk:Ayd Mill Road

message: The EIS maps on the city's website show the proposed conenction to St. Anthony being between Pascal and Hamline - not by Fairview as the map on this page shows it... Etron81 00:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map needs correction
Talk:Rhacophorus georgii

message: set as low - but if there was more accurate info re its threatened status - it should be higher rating SatuSuro 13:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:Rhacophorus modestus

message: assessed as low - but more material (RS etc) about threatened status should take it higher SatuSuro 13:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:Rhacophorus monticola

message: Assessed as low - however any additional material added re its threatened status should raise that SatuSuro 13:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:Mak's Noodle

message: Nothing in the current article to indicate notability - article should be deleted if independent references cannot be found. FlagSteward 18:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Rhacophorus poecilonotus

message: assessed as low - further material about threatened status could elevate status SatuSuro 13:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:Paper wrapped cake

message: Paper Wrapped Cake?  That is lame.  That's not even its proper name!  How about sponge cake? — *H¡ρρ¡ ¡ρρ¡ 13:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the proper name?  There are at least 15 chinese pastries that could be called sponge cake.  Benjwong 15:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Theloderma corticale

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Theloderma corticale - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 9, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-09-09. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 12:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Sausage bun

message: This looks very similar to the Greek loukanopita (λουκανόπιτα, also loukanopitaki). Can anyone research whether they are the same thing? Porfyrios 10:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be similar, but I don't think there is any connection between the two. I don't recall Greek food has any influence on Chinese food or vice versa.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.75.181 (talk) 01:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities to Greek loukanopita? 

message: Is it eaten in any part of China other than HK? Badagnani 17:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: China?
Talk:List of Western films 1950–1954

message: Are all those flag icons really needed in this table, considering almost everything in this list is from the USA? i only saw 1 possibly 2 or 3 non American films. It may just be me but this page lagged bad everytime i tried to make a change. BritishWatcher (talk) 03:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alot of flag icons
Talk:List of Western films of the 1940s

message: How can you call Northwest Passage a "traditional western", when it takes place in Upstate NY, NH and Québec? 84.23.155.84 (talk) 19:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely correct about this.  In fact, films like Northwest Passage are not even Westerns at all.  They're Colonial American period films.  However, because films set in the Colonial American frontier often had stars who frequently appeared in Westerns, Hollywood insists on calling them "Westerns."  It's often the same with Civil War films.  Films set in the Civil War American South are often called "Westerns" because a Western film star (like Jimmy Stewart) appears, because they ride horses, and because civil war army uniforms look like Western cavalry uniforms -- so in the befuddled Hollywood mind, it's a Western.  Nevertheless, whoever made this initial list was careless and simply called everything a "traditional Western," which simply is not the case.  There are outlaw Westerns, town-tamer Westerns, revenge Westerns, comedy Westerns, noir Westerns, serial Westerns, singing cowboy Westerns, and on and on.  I'm in the process of fixing them all and adding the missing films.  However, rest assured I have already fixed Northwest Passage.  It is now listed as a "Colonial American Frontier" Western, which is a more accurate description.StudierMalMarburg (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northwest Passage
Talk:Mio in the Land of Faraway

message: How is it possible that Nordisk Tonefilm was one of the production companies of Mio in the Land of Faraway (1987, source) if, according to its article in wiki.en, "the company was sold in 1969"? ThomasPusch (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: From a bit of digging, it appears that the company that took over Nordisk Tonefilm kept the name going until 1989.  I found this history (in Swedish).  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 08:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  That makes sence. I expanded the text Nordisk Tonefilm with that information. Thanks. ThomasPusch (talk) 14:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish production company?
Talk:Babes in Toyland (1997 film)

message: In the plot, it says at the end "It should also be noted that a parody is seen in the film. The train at the opening sequence of the film looks a lot like the train Casey Junior in the Disney Movie Dumbo." This really has nothing to do with the plot and should be put somewhere else, am I correct? (rct2guy (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Kaga District, Okayama

message: Is Kaga District a "newly-created" district just like Hōsu District, Ishikawa, Mikatakaminaka District, Fukui and Hidaka District, Hokkaidō Prefecture? jlog3000 (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaga District a "newly-created" district?
Talk:Suburban Knights

message: The people watching the Italian football match actually show signs of appreciation on their faces after the initial shock of the loss of their football match. They are also the only example in the video of people being "annoyed", apart from the satellite station's moderators at the start of the video's upload.
Also, the lead singer doesn't turn off the TV itself. He uses a remote to turn off the camcorder filming them, causing a loss of picture on the kid's TV.
Ginger Warrior 17:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information in the video information
Talk:Stratford District Secondary School

message: Did the school building become Stratford District Secondary School?  This question is based on a look at 428 Forman Ave on Google Street view.  The article should be updated with information about what's happened to the building.  Regards, PKT(alk) 14:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate of school building
Talk:Thomas Davis (Cook Islands politician)

message: This article has been classified as a start due to its level of detail and organisation. Its importance is high given that he is a former Prime Minister. Capitalistroadster 01:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification
Talk:Madison Davenport

message: The tone of most of the article is inappropriate; it reads like a promotional piece instead of an encyclopedia entry. Studerby 20:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Dear anonymous editor,
Please do not remove the image on the article just because you do not like it. The article is not meant for promotion but meant to inform. The image fits this purpose. Moreover it does not harm the subject involved.
Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 05:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:1931–32 Serie A

message: Removed Round by Round results section as decided in WikiProject Football page. CapPixel (talk) 13:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Round by round
Talk:1932–33 Serie A

message: Removed Round by Round results section as decided in WikiProject Football page. CapPixel (talk) 13:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Round by round
Talk:Pac-Girl

message: Does anyone else feel that this stub should be merged into Pac-Man clones? I don't think it is relevant or notable enough to warrant its own article. What say you?--Hazillow (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[Pac-Man clones]]

message: The article says "a French programmer", yet Googling for Al J. Jimenez returns a Cuban-American guy who looks very likely to be the one guilty of Pac-Gal.  He was affiliated with IBM at the time, and there were pretty few PC programmers at the day.  Does someone know more, or should we bother the author?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KiloByte (talk • contribs) 09:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should bother him just so we can get SOME kind of source for this game - maybe ask him about its history a little bit as well as his nationality. Hazillow (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''French'' programmer?
Talk:Saskatoon Hilltops

message: ***BREAKING NEWS
The Saskatoon Hilltops are the 2007 Canadian Bowl Champions!!! In the 100th edition of the National Championship, the Blue and Gold got past the St. Leonard Cougars by a score of 26-3. With the win, the Hilltops have now won 13 National Championships. 
Congratulations to Tom Sargeant and the Saskatoon Hilltops on a fantastic ending to a glorious season. ''
:I removed the preceding section and replaced it with a statement about them winning the championship.  This is pretty clearly non-encyclopedic content.  Leafschik1967 (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Issue

message: it appears that a new facility building will be ready for the 2015 season at Saskatoon Minor football field.
It will be a two story structure. 12,000 square feet on the main floor and 8,00 square feet on the second.
The bottom section will have a food service area plus washrooms on the east side. In the front there will be
two major dressing rooms, two smaller ones, a referee's room, weight and exercising room and in the back there
will be four baseball dressing rooms. On the second level there will be a balcony on the front for fans to watch
the games and in the back part there will be meeting rooms. it will be a class facility. Already we have a 
5,000 square foot storage facility for our gaters and other equipment. Also for the 2015 season there will be a
new ticket office and front gate which will have a monument honoring different sports that will be played at the park
plus plaques honoring our major sponsors. the upgrades will make this park a first class facility.
Craig Allan
Media Relations Director
Saskatoon Hilltops Football Club  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callan1905 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  facility Building For 2015 

message: As far as I can tell this article is in violation of WP:NOTGALLERY. It is very unusual to see a gallery on Wikipedia nowadays and I think it should be removed from the article. It's full of POV statements and the excess photos do not add anything to the article that the photos in the article's body don't. I don't suspect this will receive much response, if any at all, but I would like to at least express my intent to remove the gallery if there are no serious objections. --PlasmaTwa2 02:41, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery
Talk:Asahikawa Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 02:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Category talk:European composer stubs

message: Good heavens! Are all Wiki biographical lists like this - ordered by first and last names haphazardly? Seems to me like a uniform standard is called for. Or a double standard - by both first and last names (in two, unifiable, lists)? I've noticed the same with people's headwords, then added the missing name as a redirect. Keinstein 01:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dancin'

message: This needs more referencing and sources - It only had one and I added one.  I added some text to the intro in an attempt to characterize the music, but I don't know all of these songs, so please improve what I have written if you can.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 02:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know many of the songs, either, but I did find what I believe to be the source of the PBS article, and so have cited that, also, as it is a good primary source. (the Gottfried book). I also quoted a bit from the NY Times review, which has a bit of detail about a few of the dance numbers (for example, the shoes nailed down, the ice-cream costumes). I did a search on 1)Lexis-Nexis 2)google for anything about the proposed revival but could not find anything. JeanColumbia 11:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:L'Éclair

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Fromental Halévy, L'Éclair score cover - Restoration.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 16, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-02-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Fromental Halévy, L'Éclair score cover - Restoration.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon