Talk:American Basketball Association (2000–present)

message: Editing out the truth about the league's problems won't make them go away.  We're here to be honest -- "neutral" doesn't mean hiding the negative.  It means reporting it fairly. --  Robster2001 13:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing out the truth 

message: I believe that the expansion is too much. They should be limited to up to five per year. - signed by an ANON IP
*Somebody typed in Tulsa 89ers in the American Basketball Association page. Wrong, they are the 66ers of the NBA D-league! Some anon don't know pro basketball and I bet he's lost in everything. 207.200.116.202 22:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ridiculous Expansion

message: Is this team at all affiliated with the 1987-88, 1991-95 Miami Tropics of the USBL, or is the name mere coincidence? Either way it is worth mentioning. --MJHankel 17:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miami Tropics 

message: I'm going to move this to American Basketball Association (2000) since the dash looks wrong as part of the dab for the league name.  If anyone has an objection, please speak up. Vegaswikian 18:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason for the dash is that it disambiguates by the years that the league was running, this is the common disambiguator for sports teams/leagues. If you just list the 2000 then you are indicating that the league only operated for a single year. The dash without another year after it signifies that the league is ongoing. -Djsasso (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content has been removed. Please do not restore them. -Mask? 23:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use images 

message: Just curious why all those teams were deleted? They are all listed on the ABA's website. I realize that the official webpage is questionable at best. But I haven't heard any official word on OSC or otherwise that would indicate that these teams are officially dead. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 02:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008-09 Expansion Teams

message: Is it true or correct that the last two CBA teams the Albany Patroons and Lawton-Fort Sill Cavalry are joining the ABA next season? About six teams postponed playing for the season, such as 3 southern California teams in Inglewood, Long Beach, Ontario and one in Yuma, Az., another based in Hawaii. The instability of the ABA 2000's version is going down the same path like the CBA and other minor basketball leagues. + 71.102.3.86 (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The last report I have is that Lawton Fort Sill is joining the PBL.  Still waiting for an official announcement. LightningMan (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Confirmed, the Cavalry will not be an ABA team, and the Los Angeles area teams aren't fully accurate. The Red Wolves are in Ontario, Canada (pardon me), while the "Inland Empire Linx" are expected to play in the CitizensBank Arena in Ontario, California, USA. The Albany Patroons could go independent of any league, in the same manner the Harlem Globetrotters have, but are more of an entertainment venue other than a professional sports team. The Patroons and Globetrotters were one of the original NBA teams in the 1940's, but each left the league for different reasons (the Globetrotters we know well of) and the Patroons went on in the CBA as a secondary basketball league in 1948. + 71.102.3.86 (talk) 15:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009-10 addition of former CBA teams 

message: Why is "Bahamas" there? Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: At one point there was a team called the Bahama All-Pro Show.  No idea if that team is still in the league. LightningMan (talk) 02:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country(ies)  United States, Bahamas 

message: I see a brand new user account that has only edited on this page is trying to remove the entire history section.  My guess is someone thinking by hiding the facts behind how this league is run they will somehow get more people wanting "Market Reservations".  Mateinsixtynine (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I left a comment at User_talk:SportsPHD trying to explain Wikipedia policy. If reverts continue after protection expires at 04:22 on 5 June, I think that blocks may be necessary.  This article has also been mentioned at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/BasketballHistorian and WP:AN3#User:BasketballHistorian reported by User:Shadowjams (Result: ). EdJohnston (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2010

message: The language of the section I marked sounds like selling copy, as if it was taken directly from a press release.  I think it needs a rewrite. LightningMan (talk) 19:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The user who wrote that has disappeared.  The only parts worth keeping is a mention of the expansion and maybe the World Basketball Cup (as if that will happen).  A couple games against Philippines National Team could be keepable.  The $200mln figure appears to be a number plucked from thin air as the only mention of the person behind it is a news article where the guy got a cruise ship taken for failure to pay taxes.  He definitely does not have $200mln. Mateinsixtynine (talk) 23:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed most of it, reduced ABA Global to ancillary mention to the game against the Philippines, found neutral source for Philippines informaton. LightningMan (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section POV regarding 2010 initiatives 

message: Would someone like to help with adding articles for the new expansion franchises? Marlinite (talk) 05:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't get into too big of a hurry.  A lot of the new teams will disappear before December.  Mateinsixtynine (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. And could we ever get a schedule? Marlinite (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding The New Teams

message: The Atlanta Aliens article does not have independent sources to justify a standalone article per general notability guideline.  I am proposing to merge and redirect the article into this ABA article. —Bagumba (talk) 23:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does he want to tear the house down while it's still being built? Tom Danson (talk) 13:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a concern of whether the "house" is built using questionable materials.  Wikipedia relies on third party sources to establish notability.  Atlanta Aliens was tagged for general notability concerns, and the article is also about a future franchise.  While the ABA is notable, the individual franchises might not be.  Also, the notable information in the Aliens article already appears captured in American Basketball Association (2000–present)#Current_clubs.  It seems reasonable to redirect the Aliens article to the general ABA article, with no prejudice to the Aliens article being expanded later if reliable sources deem it notable of a standalone article.  If this is not acceptable, I ask that reliable independent sources be identified for the Aliens article or an article for deletion will be opened. —Bagumba (talk) 17:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Contrary to what Joe Newman would have you believe, the ABA is not comparable to fast food or retail chains.  The franchises still use the single brand; the ABA does not. Tom Danson (talk) 21:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide the independent reliable sources as requested.  Otherwise, merge/redirect seems like a better option than an AfD —Bagumba (talk) 22:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're starting to sound pretty uncivil...right now this is between the two of us. Tom Danson (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

text: My two cents are that since the ABA is largely a money making scheme for Joe Newman, until the team actually hits the court an article isn't warranted. Adding the Atlanta Aliens, Calgary Crush etc. is largely an exercise in futility until it actually plays a game. There are several stillborn ABA teams on Wikipedia and largely are not notable. Outside of super fans of the ABA and followers on Oursportscentral, I doubt you could find anyone who had ever heard of the stillborn Ontario Red Wolves. I'm against merging the article into the league article, I think it should be deleted and once it actually plays a game, then an article could be added. Unlike the majority of pro basketball leagues, the ABA is different. Awarding an expansion fee based on someone giving Joe Newman the market reservation fee, doesn't mean the team will ever see the light of day beyond the internet. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 03:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And mine are that any team which turns out never beginning play can be merged and redirected here.  For now, let's give these teams a chance! Tom Danson (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

text: There-I added an independent source.  Can we close this now? Tom Danson (talk) 15:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for helping to improve the sourcing.  However, WP:GNG requires multiple sources of significant, non-WP:ROUTINE coverage from independent sources.  The new source is more about Norris Bell and the Moncton Miracles, with trivial mention of Atlanta Aliens.  In any event, this is only one independent source uncovered in one month.  Can we come to a consensus that a merge is appropriate now, with no prejudice to recreate the article if sufficient sources are later found, or should more opinions be solicited? I seems that Wikipedia should only report when reliable sources exist. —Bagumba (talk) 16:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, the Aliens aren't getting in the New York Times, USA Today, or the Wall Street Journal anytime soon.  The league is notable, so all its teams are too.  And that "franchise" argument you used-the example only brings up retail chains which use the single brand, rather then teams which all use different brands.  Why so uncivil? Tom Danson (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

text: As for your question, you're the only one who seems to care about this.  Why not see what other Wikipedians think as they come over here (Keep in mind, I am a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, so that may come as some sort of bias).  Of course, neither of us are admins, so this is likely to go on for the next few weeks-by the time it's done, there will be reliable sources enough to settle this once and for all. Tom Danson (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge expansion team articles 

message: As a reminder, one should try to use Reliable Sources when adding in new teams.  If no information can be found on a team name, even from ABA site, shouldn't add the name.  If the only claim is on a team's page, that's not really reliable either.  Finally, for me anyways, since its tough to find a reliable source (abalive isn't reliable since there's still teams listed that haven't played in 2 years), I at least look for a team schedule or appearance on other team's schedules to verify if a team is playing or not.  I do notice, though, some pools (looking at Detroit especially) have a fear that someone might actually want to attend their games and won't put any schedule out.  LionMans Account (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding teams and [[WP:RS]]

message: Were the Kentucky Travelers ever truly associated with this league as it claims in their article?  If so, in which seasons? I'm trying to find evidence of this so I can at least link to them from the defunct teams article. It's currently an orphan article. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Usbasket seems to mention the existence of such a team .  Other than that, it seems like one of the hundreds of "travel teams" that play a few fill-in games then disappears.  Personally, I'd just delete the article as it doesn't meet WP:GNG. LionMans Account (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I agree with the prod. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kentucky Travelers]] 

message: I've updated the team list to match the league website. Since the season just started and many teams are playing abbreviated or partial schedules they may have not had a official game yet. TheScottDL (talk) 23:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I believe if a team has 0 games scheduled or is playing a very limited schedule (let's say <5 games for now), they shouldn't be listed here.  Teams that are already regularly canceling games should be removed too.  LionMans Account (talk) 00:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Maybe you read WP:V.  If a team has no schedule listed, they shouldn't be listed here.  Same with teams with very few games scheduled.  If they don't publish a schedule, that's their problem.  Maybe they should consider it though.  And if they are not playing any games or cancelling (like Buckeye Show currently), they shouldn't be listed. LionMans Account (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Since it appears I have to justify every removal here, let's see:
 Central Valley Titans - 2 games scheduled for this season, 1 actually played
 Buckeye Show 5 scheduled games, last one a few weeks ago, none played, www site not updated and facebook has no relevant content (corrected)
 Louisiana Cajun All-Stars, games removed except one that wasn't played yesterday, no scheduled games
 Philadelphia Spirit, 1 scheduled game in Feb, that's it for the season.
 Texas Cardinals, no longer on aba site, same owner as Cajun All-Stars, no schedule or anything
If you have private information, that's fine, but it really isn't usable if nobody is allowed to see it.  LionMans Account (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New ABA teams 

message: I saw the short section about the 2016-2017 season and it needs an update to add more infos about the season. --Sd-100 (talk) 20:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016-2017 season 

message: Should we keep the team listings here?  They haven't been seriously updated for a few years now.  It looks like nobody really want to take care of it either.  Unlike most leagues, it is extremely difficult to get something relatively accurate here since teams come and go pretty quickly.  Teams are regularly announced then immediately disappear.  Aside from that, if we choose to keep it, how should team listings to be done?  Should we keep some standards or just use the random mess the ABA site has?
Personally, I would suggest removing the listing and suggest checking the ABA site if someone is actually interested.  LionMans Account (talk) 01:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't need a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC for this, especially since I can find no evidence that WP:RFCBEFORE was observed. Discuss it here in the normal manner by all means; and if you want to attract wider participarion, you may leave a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basketball directing people here. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

text: If it's possible to verifiably update it, I'd suggest tagging it with .  However, if sourcing is questioned, tag it with  or similar.—Bagumba (talk) 14:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem.  It can be done, but its a lot of work too.  The official listings has teams that have quit the league, teams that never existed, teams that haven't played in years, and a lot of placeholder city names.  Basically, someone who does it will be doing more work keeping the listings up-to-date than the people who run this league do. LionMans Account (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I tagged it for updates. No objection if you or others more knowledgeable about the league than me feel deletion is a better approach here.—Bagumba (talk) 11:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Since its been 8 months and no serious attempts to fix it, I removed the listings.  The same problems still exist as before:  no idea whose playing and no good way to verify whose actually playing.  If someone wants to actually fix it, feel free to add it back in.  LionMans Account (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Should we keep the team listings?