Talk:Dehousing

message: I have moved the page back from "Dehousing cabinet paper" as there is no consensus for the move. If anyone wishes to move it please put in a WP:RM and build a consensus for moving the page to that name. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dehousing 

message: Users Philip Baird Shearer (talk) and Binksternet (talk) claim in the history that the contents of the article entitled Dehousing was about the Dehousing cabinet paper and was not about the general topic Dehousing, so the contents of the Dehousing article was moved to the correctly-titled Dehousing cabinet paper Mugs2109 (talk) 18:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dehousing is not an English word (It is not recorded in the Oxford English Dictionary) when it is used it is usually used to refer to this paper and the policy it suggested following. Any other minority usages can be dealt with via a  disambiguation page.--Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I support this change from dehousing as well. It should be Dehousing Cabinet Paper, because this is precisely what the topic deals with. It is not about the further expansion of similar campaigns or anything like that.--Npovshark (talk) 17:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Dehousing is not a dictionary word, what other topics do you think would be covered by this title? --PBS (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Dehousing cabinet paper]]

message: From the edit history:
:21:31, 10 July 2008 Mugs2109 (Deleted redundant information that the reader can read in the actual content of the paper, deleted irrelevant and improperly positioned command sentence)
The information you (user:Mugs2109) have deleted was in the lead, and is a summary of the rest of the article. Having such an introduction is recommended in WP:LEAD "The lead section, lead, or introduction (also lede) of a Wikipedia article is the section before the first heading. The lead serves both as an introduction to the article below and as a short, independent summary of the important aspects of the article's topic." --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Assuming WP:BRD: from the edit history:
*10:14, 8 December 2013‎ Victor falk  m (Victor falk moved page Dehousing to De-housing: per WP:COMMONNAME)
*10:16, 8 December 2013‎ Victor falk  (sp.) 
*13:28, 8 December 2013‎ PBS  (PBS moved page De-housing to Dehousing over redirect: not convinced it is the more common name take it to RM) (undo)
* 13:30, 8 December 2013‎ PBS  (Undid revision 585107091 by Victor falk not a spelling mistake.)
@user:Victor falk. I am not sure how you came to the conclusion that "De-housing" is the common name because a Google book search on "dehousing paper" and "de-housing paper" (to remove noise from other uses of de/housing returns:
*["dehousing paper"] About 67 results
*["de-housing paper"] 4 result with a Google search comment of 
-- PBS (talk) 13:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  dehousing  or de-housing 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dehousing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227151505/http://www.valourandhorror.com/BC/Issues/Singletn.php to http://www.valourandhorror.com/BC/Issues/Singletn.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified