lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Giulio Bonasone

message: This is a great start to an article, however there seems to be no structure. I would first work in outlining what exactly you plan to do with this artist, with a few basic headlines on where you would focus. As of now it seems to be just one giant blob with lists, and I would personally designate those lists to their own sections. The actual content in the article seems to be lacking too but that's alright as I'm sure this person is pretty obscure, I would designate more time to checking out related artists and also using Oxford Art Online as a tool since it's available. You've got a great jumping-off point for this article, but there seems to be nothing in regards to his style or personal life. Arguably I'd focus on what he accomplished/completed as a craftsman of the time. It seems to me that there's a left to do so I'll just be tidying up some grammar/sentence flow along with the structure. Feel free to revert anything you happen to not like. Also, add sources as there seems to be none that I can see. Rickitpower (talk) 05:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Francesco Borgani

message: It seems unlikely that Borgani was a student of Costa. Costa died in 1561, 26 years before Borgani was born. Mduvekot (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   pupil of Ippolito Costa  

message: The article needs to be rewritten. 
* According to more recent, highly reputable encyclopedias the artist was born in or around 1557. In 1586/7, he worked already as a painter in the castle of Goito. (See the Italian Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani and the German Thieme-Becker.)
* The above objection by Mduvekot is still true: Even if Borgani was born 30 years earlier (c. 1557 instead of 1587), he still was an infant of c. 4 years when Ippolito Costa died in 1561. So, Costa cannot have been his teacher (at the level intended within the present context).
* The painting of St. Francis shown and discussed in the article is currently dated "c. 1618" by the museum (Musei d'Italia). So, the previous "postmortal" dating is not an argument against Borgani's authorship anymore.
Not being a native speaker of English, and not very familiar with the English Wikipedia's established practices, I'd rather leave this task to more experienced (EN-)wikipedians. -- Martinus KE (talk) 18:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable information
Category talk:United States counties templates

message: It is at :Category:United States county navigational boxes. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 21-Dec-2007: That other category is for thousands of individual county or parish templates, not for the new whole-state templates. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This category already exists

message: This category (:Category:United States counties templates) is a national-level grouping by state, whereas ":Category:United States county navigational boxes" is a state-level grouping, currently expanding with thousands of individual county (or parish) templates of 43 states, pertaining to parts of those states.
This category (:Category:United States counties templates) pertains only to whole-state templates of the United States.  Such whole-state templates would be lost in the other category which contains thousands of individual county or parish templates. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's all well and good but we already have a very similar named category at :Category:United States county templates. And this cat here is not categorized, so it's an orphan, which we really don't want. Orphan cats defeat the purpose of categorization. For now, I'm going to categorize the cat to at least have it somewhere in the our cat scheme. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: National level focus not part of state
Talk:Scipione Cappella

message: Hello, rJay here. I noticed this page is a stub. I know nothing of Scipione Cappella. If you are reading this, and have some information, please add the information, or send the information to me: rjayt2@yahoo.com. Thanks. :)
rJay</font>talk</font> 17:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub
Talk:John Warren Davis (judge)

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/John Warren Davis was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Bartolomeo Coriolano

message: According to the Chiaroscurro (sp?) section of our woodcut article, "in the German style one block usually had only lines and is called the "line block", whilst the other block or blocks had flat areas of colour and are called "tone blocks". The Italians usually used only tone blocks, for a very different effect, much closer to the drawings the term was originally used for, or watercolours." ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The information on the page comes directly from the sources. He was also from a German family that moved to Italy, so there is a mixing of styles. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German style
Talk:Jacobello del Fiore

message: 1) This article could include more specifics about Fiore's upbringing.
2) This article could showcase more examples of Fiore's work.
Realcjcruz (talk) 07:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This entry has already covered a quite substantial amount of information about Jacobello del Fiore. I like the fact that CJ actually links this entry to other wikipedia pages, since many of the terms are quite difficult to understand. This entry is well cited.
Structure In my opinion, I believe that the artistic development of the artist, from early period to latter life, should be under the same big section. Sometimes you also incorporate major works to the artistic development, but I guess maybe you would like to have a separate section on the major work of this artist? You might also want to separate legacy and "latter works and final years"
Content and language You might want to look into the grammar, specially the tenses. Sometimes past tense is more appropriate than present tense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atsushi Hu (talk • contribs) 13:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atsushi Hu's review and comments 

message: I think, especially in the lead section, the tone of your writing can come off to others as a little poetic or fluffed up. Terms such as "steeped in" can easily be corrected to a more concise and neutral term. There are a few sentences here and there that could use a little more grammatical precision: He is known for his youthful career steeped in the Late Gothic style popularized by Altichiero da Verona and Jacopo Avanzi, and his later mature work that returned to a local Venetian style established by the school of Paolo Veneziano.
. Also, especially in the lead section, I think it might be better not to start sentences with "this". The lead section is what people will most of the time only read, hence it is good to make sure every sentence is precise and explicit. I think it might also be helpful to readers to address some of his notable works in the lead section. 
Most of the comments I have to offer for the lead section can be applied to the rest of the article. I think just be careful and make sure your tone is as direct and neutral as possible. Be careful of where the commas are placed in the sentences because they can really make the whole sentence grammatically incorrect. example: first sentence of early life and works: Jacobello is likely to have been born in 1375, since by the time of his marriage in 1394, he was still under the tutelage of his father, Francesco del Fiore.
. In this paragraph, don't use colons if it is really not needed-  Francesco was a painter himself: in 1376 
. Lastly, be careful with your prepositions. Some examples are "Dated in 1407" compared to "Dated to 1407". These prepositions can make a huge difference in the overall quality of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HannahPark0709 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hannah Park's review comments
Talk:Jean Jacques Flipart

message: When it says of one of his engravings, "after so and so", what does this mean, exactly? Unschool (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It means that the engraver tried to exactly copy an oil painting onto a plate.  The oil painting that he is working from, or the artist who made that painting, is the work (or the artist) that the plate is "after".  Raymondwinn (talk) 21:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Lorenzo di Niccolò

message: Overall, the writing is strong--clear, scholarly and unbiased--and the content is interesting and diverse. You covered essentially all of the different aspects I felt needed to be included: early life, training, connections with other well-known artists, artistic development, style, and important works. I also love the inclusion of information about the recent auctions of some of his works; its a unique look into the value of his works today, and therefore gives the reader an idea of his renown.
One area I think could be easily improved is the lead of the article. The goal of the lead, as listed in the Wikipedia peer review, is to give the reader a decent understanding of the issue at hand and content of the article. The discussion of his birth date would fit better into the early life section. Some things that could be added into the lead section are the names of some of his most notable works and the fact his son was also a notable Renaissance painter. You could also include more information about his artwork such as the information that he painted frescoes and triptychs, the content of his paintings (religious? portraits?), his use of the Trecento style, and what he painted with (tempera and gold). 
I think the article could also benefit by a couple of structural changes. Instead of the headings "Early life" and "Maturity," I would suggest that you parse the information in those two sections out into two new sections, one you might title "Bibliography" or "Personal Life", and another titled something like "Artistic Career/Important Works/Etc." The bibliography section would contain information about when he was born, who he trained under, who he was friends with, the circles he moved in, information about his son, and when it is estimated he died. The other section can contain the information about his earliest and last works, artistic development, style, major works, and more. Although at certain points this separation may be difficult and it may seem there is overlap in the two sections, I think it would greatly help with the clarity and flow of the article. I think "Market" can easily remain its own section. 
A couple final suggestions/notes:
* I have copyedited the article, but avoided any edits I thought would change the article drastically. This includes adding a couple links to other relevant Wikipedia articles (such as Spinello Aretino's).
* The article would also benefit from the inclusion of a couple additional images, if they are available to be shared on Wikipedia.  
* Something strange seemed to have happened to the source code for the references. Only two are listed, although you have 13 different citations in the body of your article, and the first one is a long list of code instead of an understandable citation. 
Keh52 (talk) 04:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:HMS Duchess (H64)

message: The survivor account of Ernest Swinhoe, on watch at the time on board HMS Duchess (account by his daughter here  http://www.hmsbarham.com/ship/hmsduchesscollision.php), is clear that it was dark and windy.  He clearly saw the approaching battleship.  There is no mention of fog.  I wonder where this reference comes from?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerry Porter 21 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It came from the quoted reference.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the evidence that the collision with HMS Barham happened in thick fog? 

message: "Rammed" seems to me (er, not exactly a nautical expert, no!) to sound somewhat deliberate. In this article, should it be a different verb, or qualified by something like "accidentally"? Or do you think it's OK? It just read slightly oddly to me, as if they had pointed the Barham at her with malicious intent ... Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Qualified.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect! Many thanks DBaK (talk) 11:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "rammed" right?
Talk:Tommaso da Modena

message: There is a dating problem with the painting of Hugh of Saint-Cher.
According to the text, Tomaso di Modena (1326-1379) painted the portrait in 1352, yet, Hugh was born c.1200 and died in 1263. Obviously, one is wrong and I do not believe it to be Hugh's entry as the Catholic texts appear to be correct (but, there's always the old Chinese Whispers syndrome). GlassyEye (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hugo of Saint-Cher
Talk:List of Blue Drop episodes

message: Here link to wayback machine archive for those refs:
   
--KrebMarkt 21:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done :) --KrebMarkt 09:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website down 

message: First there was a test of the thought-wave weapon; then, afterward, there was an explosion on the Blue that killed Onomil. Evidence: Hagino flies over the island and sees the many corpses of the islanders strewn everywhere. The explosion aboard the Blue occurs only after the islanders have already died. We can logically conclude that there was an initial test of the thought-wave weapon, followed by an explosion to cover up the test.
71.136.247.111 (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened at Kamioki Island
Talk:Matteo Ponzone

message: Required Freelance Content Writers
Content writers required for different freelance projects.
Skills Required:
a)  Strong vocabulary, punctuation, and grammatical skills.
b) Writing for & managing blogs,forums for the given content.
c) Collating and understanding the brief & delivering results.
d) Experience as well as Freshers can  also apply.
Qualification:
UG & Graduate - Any Specialization
PG - Any PG Course - Any Specialization, Post Graduation (Not Compulsory)
https://www.limeexchange.com/registration/register_step1?campaign_id=115&cust_rel_man=94&channel=SourceWebsitename&affiliate_id=53766  —Preceding unsigned comment added by William488 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Required Freelance Content Writers
Talk:Carlo Portelli

message: Im sorry, but this has to be speculation. If 75% of the sistine chapel ceiling was painted by someone else then michelangelo, then that wouldve been discovered ages ago. I tried to find sources of Veronica Portelli, but there were none. no sources on Veronica Portelli whatsoever. 77.250.25.165 (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of part of article
Talk:WBEM (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a distributed computing environment management technology is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the technology. - Dravecky (talk) 07:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Girolamo da Udine

message: I propose to merge Girolamo di Bernardino into Girolamo da Udine. It seems they duplicate each other. (Generated using markasduplicate.js.) --Marcok (talk) 09:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. The Italian article's references suggest as much.  Looks like the merged article should be titled either Girolamo di Bernardino or Girolamo di Bernardino da Udine. -Coreydragon (talk) 09:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Muránska planina

message: There was a fairly active discussion of the translation of the name on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AMur%C3%A1%C5%88_Plain where it is said "plains are characterized by their low altitude, rich soil, and they are generally alluvial origin" however the USA's high plains https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Plains_(United_States) are higher overall than this, so my personal preference is to go with Muráň Plain. 85.237.234.57 (talk) 16:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translation of name. 
Talk:Giuseppe Vermiglio

message: I added an external link to a rare painting of St James wearing a cape with the symbol of Compostelle (st jacques shell) exposed in Repossi gallery, Italy -- luxorion  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:7E8:C99E:E500:7082:3242:D45E:7662 (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repossi Galery
Talk:Flockton

message: The 2006 population estimate reference is a dead link. The nearest archive version is 11 June 2011 which gives a population of 1,490 in a mid-2009 estimate. Keith D (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Giovanni Volpato

message: Dear Wiki-users,
Please consider that, according to the Wiki page of Volpato, he collaborated only a few years apart, in Rome, with two people named Ducros, both from the same Swiss origins, with very similar life spans, occupations & general backgrounds :
On one side there is Pietro Ducros - Wikipedia
On the other Louis Ducros aka Abraham-Louis-Rodolphe Ducros - Wikipedia
How likely is it that these people are 2 different people?
That is my question.
The text says "He engraved a series of landscapes and vedute of Rome with Pietro Ducros." without offering the source(s) to attest this, nor the period involved.
There is hardly any (to none) information on the work of Pietro Ducros through the actual prints still found in collections around the world, but a lot on Louis Ducros' work. 
Indeed, the Nationalmuseum - Louis Ducros, The MET and the British Museum (see Spencer Alley: Views in Rome by Giovanni Volpato and Louis Ducros) a.o. all have work attributed to and sometimes signed with Louis DuCros with regard to Roman views (veduti), done in collaboration with Volpato.
Two important Swiss sources for artists originating from that region do not know of a Pietro or Pierre Ducros, but do have plenty to say on Louis or his full name Abraham-Louis-Rodolphe Du Cros.
Having done quite a bit of research and finding (sometimes only succinct) references of both names in early and late 19th C. dictionaries, I am more and more convinced they are, in fact, one and the same person.
I suspect that some may have simply copy-pasted earlier information, without checking sources. I suspect some circular referencing too... 
That's what I'd like to prove, with your help!
In the Talk Pages of both wiki-pages aforementioned :  
Talk:Abraham-Louis-Rodolphe Ducros - Wikipedia and Talk:Pietro Ducros - Wikipedia,
I've developed a detailed argumentation/comparison to that effect based on the analysis of several sources from the late 1700's on, in different languages (translated in ENG for your convenience).
If you're interested, READ them and offer your view on the matter.
Or better even, add your research/knowledge to the debate!
Thanks,
Shooting4truth
Shooting4truth (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Louis Ducros the same man as Pietro Ducros?
Talk:Juan Bautista Vázquez

message: Appears to be the same person as Juan Bautista Vázquez the Elder and should presumably be merged. I'm guessing this 19th century source was simply wrong on place of birth. Or do we think it was a different person with the same name and a similar trajectory? - Jmabel | Talk 23:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Priest Cove

message: Priest Cove and The Brisons should really be part of the Cape Cornwall article.  They are linked; the cove is beneath and in the lee of the Cape. By the time the Cape Cornwall mine was shut down it was part of the mine to the south of Priest Cove. There is a reef from the Cape to The Brisons, one of the reasons for the Coastguard look out. Jowaninpensans (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:List of military electronics of the United States

message: When I find the time, I plan to add the US JETDS radars from List of radars to this article.  70.251.32.227 (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of radars
Talk:Dancing Stage featuring True Kiss Destination

message: "Precious Moments" by TKD is a Japanese version of "When Will I See You Again" by The Three Degrees. My edit saying so got reverted. What's the deal? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Linking the song title directly to the article is misleading, cause it's definitely not the same song. I'll turn it into a note that way the distinction is clear. Does the "When Will I See You Again" article mention the TKD cover in anyway? If not see if you can find a source to add to the note.  æronphonehome  05:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  When Will I See You Again
Talk:Military history of South Africa during World War II

message: Please avoid the use of epithets where that is inappropriate. --41.151.116.1 (talk) 09:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silly use of language.  

message: There were several measures taken by the Union of South Africa taken against people of German descent during (and after the war) i.e. "repatriation": https://archive.org/details/RepartriationOfGermansFromSouthWestAfricaAndSouthAfricaToGermanyWarCabinetOctober1945 --41.150.102.145 (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  discriminatory measures against people of German descent 

message: Given that South Africa's declaration of war, was nothing else, but support for the British war effort. Who did actually pay South Africa for the cost of war? And what was the total cost of war for South Africa? --41.145.141.113 (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost of World War II 

message: AFAIK South Africa never adopted this statute. Status of the Union Act, 1934 was the act which functioned relatively identical to that statute though. Anyone confirm this? ( SailingOn (talk) 04:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statue of Westminster Reference 

message: Solve for x  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:31FF:77:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 13:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maths
Talk:Chetnole railway station

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Chetnole Railway Station. The marker is a few hundred feet off, off in a field. Here's where it should be: 50°51'59.04"N  2°34'22.84"W --76.105.145.143 (talk) 08:34, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for pointing it out. Deor (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:List of St Ives artists

message: I think it is necessary to remove the section 'Artists living in or near St Ives' as this is far too general an a deviation from the page title 'List of St Ives Artists'. 
There are absolutely numerous artists currently in or near St Ives. How big is the radius of near St Ives? Who is considered a practicing artist to be noted on this list?  It is important that notability of this article is adhered to in respect of the many great names of the past years. This page should remain historical and worthwhile, and rely on well cited information referring to established artist. It should not become a 'free for all' for anyone who happens to live near St Ives who wants a Wikipedia mention.CornwallArt (talk) 23:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)