Talk:Kharavela

message: Does the stub on Kharvela refer to the same persion? Is Kharvela a legitimate alternative spelling of Kharavela? Sagsaw 01:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kharavela vs. Kharvela

message: I visited Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves near Bhubaneswar on 15-2-2007. Kharvela and Kharavela are same and have been merged and expanded and provided images also. burdak 05:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 02:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: Typo: debateable==>debatable Join Typo Team - You can help! Aclayartist (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo Cleanup

message: In the date section it has been added that According to Indian numismatist P.L. Gupta, the name of the Yavana (Indo-Greek) king mentioned in the 8th line of the Hathigumpha inscription is Vimaka. He identifies Vimaka with Vima Kadphises, and based on this, dates the Hathigumpha inscription to 2nd century BCE. Now first of all Vima Kadphises was a Kushana king, not Yavana (Indo-Greek) and secondly he ruled around 90 to 100 AD. So that doesnot corroborate with 2nd century BCE. So, some rectification needs to be done. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kharavela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232906/http://www.sdstate.edu/projectsouthasia/upload/HathigumphaInscription.pdf to http://www.sdstate.edu/projectsouthasia/upload/HathigumphaInscription.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: and others: This article relies on very old sources (1885 etc) when a first satisfactory and reliable cast/ink-impression was not yet available or published. Please see the summary and sources in Hathigumpha inscription article, which I have updated. This is a highly disputed inscription, and it being the primary source on Kharavela.... we must ask if we need to update this article, or at least present the different readings of the inscription and the scholarly views that were published in the last 125 years for NPOV. Some of the claims in the Reign section are fringe, in light of the best ink-impressions and published peer-reviewed scholarship. I will hold off for a while before further edits, await comments to my concerns and suggestions if any. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 23:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work on Hathigumpha inscription! This article has been on my todo list for quite some time, especially because of outdated sources and overlap with the article on the inscription, but I never found time to edit it. If you have content and sources ready, feel free to update the article. Based on the edits I see on my watchlist, this article mostly attracts anons and newbies seeking to glorify their state or religion through minor edits. I don't think you'll run into opposition from anyone well-versed with WP:RULES, if you remove outdated / fringe / NPOV content. utcursch | talk 14:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I will do a bit of cleanup. Would appreciate if you can review and improve this article further, when you get time. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review comments