lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rotterdam Marathon

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.time-to-run.com/marathon/rotterdam/index.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 17:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --SFB 17:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: In accordance with the terms and conditions of the event I believe that ALL runners are entitled to run the 2008 marathon for free given that this years event was canceled. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bah23 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 cancellation - ALL RUNNERS GET FREE ENTRY
Talk:32nd Regiment Royal Artillery

message: This statement contained within Strategic Defence and Security Review - Army:Written statement - HCWS367 might not use the exact word "disbandment" but....
HQ 102 Logistic Brigade, 32nd Regiment Royal Artillery, 35 Engineer Regiment, Headquarters 64 Works Group Royal Engineers, 2 Medical Regiment, Headquarters 4th Regiment Royal Military Police, 33 Field Hospital and 104,105 and 106 Battalions of the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers reserve will be rationalised, with all manpower in those units being redeployed to other areas of the Army in its refined structure
...I'd say that "disbandment" is exactly what it means, and therefore the word "disbanded" is acceptable shorthand for it. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: So picky.JessPavarocks (talk) 11:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disbandment 

message: 74 Battery (The Battle Axe Company) Royal Artillery has it's own page saying it is part of 47th Regiment RA so stop posting old links as sources. Just because that presentation slide contains the name 32 RA doesn't mean it is up to date. The CO has changed in any case. BlueD954 (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not use old sources
Talk:On the Beach (2000 film)

message: Are we entirely sure about the origin of this film being USA? It's quite obviously shot in Melbourne, Australia, and several of the production companies are Australian.. I vaguely remember it being financed by the Australian Film Finance people as well...
59.167.155.117 (talk) 12:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The generally accepted authority on this sort of thing these days is the Internet Movie Data Base (imdb.com).  According to them funding and production were done in Australia, but with Showtime (an American cable/satellite film distribution network) as one of the production companies, making it a USA-Australia co-production.loupgarous (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This plot needs to be re-written. It should outline the plot of this film only. Differences between the novel and an earlier film should be noted in a separate section. Hopefully someone familiar with this film, as well as the other film and the book can undertake this.  - thewolfchild  22:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:The Crime of Cuenca

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: "The movie is an attack against torture and it is understood that the crime in the title is committed by the Guardia Civil in torturing the suspects."
There's no ref for this (or almost anything in the article), and the wording is overly passive ("it is understood"). A better wording would be that "The title of the film plays on the idea that the real crime in Cuenca was the torture of the suspects committed by the Guardia Civil" or similar. I'd jump in and change it, but I have no source, so it would be my opinion. Does anyone have an external source for the original claim? -- PaulxSA (talk) 23:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs, phrasing and opinion
Talk:Franklinton, Louisiana

message: Both of these sections are non encyclopedic. The notable people section cited individuals, sometimes for crimes, without giving any source, which violated both the policy on biographies of living people and the policy against original research. David.Monniaux 16:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia and notable people 
Talk:Hrafna-Flóki Vilgerðarson

message: It is inaccurate that he captured the ravens in Faroe Islands. He had them all ready leaving Norway.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.157.15.205 (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ravens 

message: It says Flóki is the first Norseman. But Garðar Svavarsson was a Norseman and he found it first. The page is contradicting itself. Shadzad (talk) 22:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flóki or [[Garðar Svavarsson]] 

message: Hrafna-Flóki Vilgerðarsson (Old Norse: [ˈhrɑvnɑ-ˌfloːke ˈwilˌɡerðɑz̠ˌson]; Modern Icelandic: [ˈr̥apna-ˌflouːcɪ ˈvɪlˌcɛrðarˌsɔːn]; born 9th century) was the first Norseman to intentionally sail to Iceland. His story is documented in the Landnámabók manuscript; however, the precise year of his arrival is not clear. He settled in this new land then known as Garðarshólmi. 120.28.189.51 (talk) 09:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floki
Talk:The Vision (film)

message: I saw this recently (I think I also saw some of it when first broadcast).
In the artical it says "starred Dirk Bogarde and Helena Bonham Carter".  While Carter was definately in it, I recone it stared Bogarde and Lee Remick.  I'll see if I can manage to check the credits and use them before editing.
Dannman (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starring Lee Remic
Talk:Ketil Trout (Iceland)

message: I do not think the link Torgar is correct. As seen in the map in the Hålogaland article, Lofoten off in the northwestern parts, and Torgar is in the south.
There are several sources that say Torgar is :no:Torget (Brønnøy).</br>
There seems to be some objections to this identification.</br>
But the Torgar as shown on saga maps (e.g., the Viking edtion of Egils saga) seems to be located at Torget (See Brønnøy article).--Kiyoweap (talk) 10:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Trogar
Talk:Kirkjubæjarklaustur

message: Lovely photo, but I wonder whether 'house' is a suitable description of the building.  House is usually taken to mean someone's home whereas I'd guess that this only been used as a barn for decades.--JBellis 11:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  House at Kirkjubæjarklaustur 
Talk:Tina Yuzuki

message: Facts for reassessment:
* 3 times winner of Major Award in JAV industry. AV Open
* placed at the 10th among all-time legend of Japanese AV actresses, according to the reliable source (DMM, which is equivalent to AVN (magazine) in JAV, held a poll of its customers in 2012 to choose the 100 all-time best AV actresses to celebrate the 30th anniversary of adult videos in Japan).
* List : Notable AV idols making a major impact on the industry, for their high public visibility, or for their extraordinarily long careers.
* Performed in over hundreds works for last 10 years.
* According to a Korean news article, Rio was placed at the 7th rank of the highest yearly wage taking people in Japanese AV industry.
--Raynor999 (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Pornography|importance=HIGH
Talk:Arthur Baysting

message: I saw the show in question, and I'm almost certain that the person who said it was Bruno Lawrence, while in a conversation with "Neville Purvis", rather than being said by NP himself. From memory:
 NP: So how do you think the series went?
 BL: Not too bad - and at least no-one said "fuck".
Grutness...wha? 23:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm. Googling suggests my memory is wrong - presumably it was Purvis speaking to Lawrence, not the other way round. Grutness...wha? 00:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Fuck 
Talk:MS Sovereign

message: What? Why doe it say that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.251.125.85 (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GodMother

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus.   No such user (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: MS Sovereign →  – reason for move: Vessel has been scrapped, so the page should be moved to her original name Angelgreat (talk) 02:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Angelgreat (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 May 2021
Talk:Arthur Howard

message: This word should be clarified or changed.  "Old Bailey" terminology implies the demands of a rent boy, male prostitute, or generally soliciting for gay sex in a public area. A wider meaning is one of insistent demands, usually for money. 220.244.238.166 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importuning 

message: Brother Leslie Howard is so classified. Rothorpe (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: From the "Life and career" section (emphasis mine):
:Born as Arthur John Stainer, he was the younger son of Ferdinand (Frank) Steiner...
It seems really unlikely that his own surname would be similar to but different from his father's.  Can we get some confirmation here? The passage is unsourced.  The Leslie Howard article states that his real name was "Leslie Howard Steiner", matching the father's spelling. 12.233.147.42 (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stainer" or "Steiner"?
Talk:19th Regiment Royal Artillery

message: moved the page to 19 Regiment Royal Artillery with this edit  using the edit summary "correct name". I have asked Lampshade Dog on his/her talkpage about this, but this is really the  correct venue. I'm not convinced that the cardinal numbering is correct, and many official sources certainly use ordinal as well as cardinal. Without a a very reliable source I see no good reason to move the page and no evidence - yet - that "19 Regiment" is "correct name" and "19th Regiment" is incorrect. Keri (talk) 19:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordinal v cardinal
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/removeAccessKeys

message: Hi. I just wrote a simplified alternative for the script that works better even. Would be nice be replaced with current script:
$(function () { $("[accesskey]").removeAttr("accesskey").each(function () { this.title = this.title.replace(/ \[alt-.*/, ); }); });
(cc: TheDJ)
–ebraminiotalk 16:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplified
Talk:Close to Shore

message: You removed the merge tag.  Now, to be clear, I'm not a fan of drive-by mergetags with no explanation either, but I made my case in the edit summary, and dropping the notability tag made the problem / reason for merge pretty clear, right?  Really, this was a polite way to check "let's see if anyone has this article on their watchlist and is willing to improve it."  Existence on Goodreads is not sufficient for WP:NBOOK (and I say this as someone who thinks that Wikipedia's coverage of books is wildly underdone, with tons of notable books out there without articles yet).  It could be equally said no case has been made for keeping this a separate article.
Anyway, was this strictly a procedural removal of the merge tag, or do you actually think this article is notable in its own rights?  I am inclined to merge and redirect, personally.  But if you think the article has merit as a standalone, I'm happy to give you time to improve it, or we can potentially go to AFD if you think it's fine as is.  SnowFire (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the ping and for now making the case here (as per WP:MERGEPROP); my close was procedural, and I didn't check for other sources to see if WP:NBOOK was met, so hadn't taken a position on its notability. I suppose that you're arguing that there is only one review cited, rather than 2 (reasonably dismissing goodreads). I've had a look in my university's library and there are plenty of references independent of the source. I've added a few, including some relevant analysis from those reviews. The review of the 2003 adaptation also suggest that it will have made school reading lists, suggesting that it might also meet point 4. of WP:BOOKCRIT. So, I'd recommend leaving it, but don't feel strongly; there's no doubt more to include from other reviews. Klbrain (talk) 22:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To be clear, I was the one who added The New Yorker review.  The article is in better shape now.  I suspect it could potentially still be merged as a section, but don't feel strongly enough if you'd rather keep it separate. SnowFire (talk) 03:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential merge
Talk:Sturlunga saga

message: I have noted that dating the compilation to c.1300 is disputed. The premise for dating the compilation to c.1300 is that Þórður Narfason (d. 1308) was the compiler. This assumption has been carried forward since the 19th century with little question, even though more than one candidate for the compiler has been known about since the 1800s. Recent research has questioned this assumption, and proposed that the original compilation may have been produced as late as c.1330. Sturlunga (talk) 07:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Sturlunga saga compilation
Talk:Ashwini Bhave

message: Usama is now living in Pakistan who attacks on her and rape while she returned from the shooting of sainik movie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.7.40 (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rape case on her.
Talk:Athene Seyler

message: Athene Seyler (as well as Margaret Rutherford) were guys (tranvestites!!!) Vridreyk (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  since when is telling the truth vandalism?
Talk:Celebrity Summit

message: I travelled on Celebrity Summit in May 2003 in Alaska so is this another ship with the same name? Cruise Mapper would suggest that its the same ship as I remember hearing about the Hubbard Glacier incident but all the stuff we have says it was Celebrity Summit when we were on it.
http://www.cruisemapper.com/accidents/Celebrity-Summit-713
In which case the article might need some re-working Steve Atty (talk) 20:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Summits?
Talk:26th Regiment Royal Artillery

message: https://twitter.com/XIX_CO/status/809519600538972160
ACSilver (talk) 08:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  to become a Division fires regiment 

message: https://www.forces.net/news/royal-artillery-battery-says-farewell-now
BlueD954 (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  16 battery placed in Suspended Animation
Talk:Augusto Benedico

message: An IP editor added a paragraph written entirely in Spanish.  I do not speak the language, but according to Google Translate, it is topical (though entirely unsourced).  I am including it here in case any future editor wishes to translate and cite.
:Indented line
Augusto Pérez Lías nació el 20 de diciembre de 1909 en Alicante, España. Además de actor era escritor. En Barcelona se inició en el teatro estudiantil. Se graduó en derecho en el 1936. En Febrero de 1939 fue confinado en un campo de concentración en Francia. Cinco meses más tarde arribó al puerto de Veracruz como refugiado a bordo del celebérrimo Mexique. Un año después obtuvo la naturalización. Aunque era abogado no pudo ejercer en México trabajando como visitador médico, luego como publicista de unos laboratorios farmacéuticos. Cipriano Rivas Cheriff, hombre de teatro español, también refugiado, lo invitó a representar un papel en la obra de teatro "Esquina peligrosa", debutando en el 1948. A los pocos días de iniciarse la temporada renunció a su empleo para entregarse de lleno a la actuación. A finales de la década del 40 debutó en el cine y a principios de la década del 60 en la televisión. Falleció el 19 de enero de 1992 en México, D.F. a consecuencia de una grave dolencia pulmonar a los 82 años de edad. El nombre de este extraordinario primer actor está escrito con letras de oro en la historia del cine, la televisión y el teatro mexicano.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Begnome (talk • contribs) 04:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish text
Talk:1st Regiment Royal Horse Artillery

message: More info added from http://www.army.mod.uk/1rha/history.htm --Jezarnold (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cut n Paste from the http://www.army.mod.uk/1rha/history.htm  pages have now been rewritten. --Jezarnold (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do not place unsourced material.
o not place, date and grammatically unsourced statements.
BlueD954 (talk) 08:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now cleaned the page up removing unsourced material and formatting a few references properly. Please read WP:CITE. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

text: It may be because you are not formatting your citations properly. As previously suggested, please read WP:CITE to find out to do this. I would strongly advise against "formatting later": you should properly format the citations as you go along or the details you have captured will not stand up to verification. A template is available (and widely used in this article) to help you with this. Dormskirk (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  STOP this weak editi at once 

message: Would it be possible to create a new section for additional reading/bibliography?
There are a few books that are related:
Maj. Francis Duncan
History Of The Royal Regiment Of Artillery.Compiled From The Original Records. Vol Ii (1784-1815}: History Of The Royal Regiment Of from the Original Records 1784-1815: v. 2 - ISBN-10	1845741757
ISBN-13	978-1845741754
And
IN FOREIGN FIELDS: Heroes of Iraq and Afghanistan in their own words - ISBN - 9780955285486 Jafnharr (talk) 09:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section. 

message: The very scant information in the "Formation" section is lacking a significant amount of detail. If someone could see fit to adding some of the details below it would make the article much richer. I would do it myself but it will only get deleted. The source for this content is already cited in the formation section.  Jafnharr (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed what you had included above as much of it had been copied and pasted from . As such it was a breach of copyright. I recommend that you read WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:COPYRIGHT before making any more edits. Dormskirk (talk) 10:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation and history
Talk:3rd Regiment Royal Horse Artillery

message: User:Lecutas left the following in the article just above the section on WW2
The undernoted history is subject to copyright in my book Cairo to Berlin.
   1. ISBN-10: 0907322905
   2. ISBN-13: 978-0907322900
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cairo-Berlin-Regiment-Artillery-1939-1945/dp/0907322905/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271704352&sr=1-1
Unless you can cite your alternative source for using the exact text from my book I should appreciate it for you to remove your content.
I do agree that the history as it was did look rather like a cut and paste and I have therefore deleted it. NtheP (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it copy the text from your book verbatum?  Its also odd that hte only place that I can find that sells this book is Amazon, and hey don't actualy have any in stock.Slatersteven (talk) 20:13, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Sir David Llewellyn, 4th Baronet

message: Please would an admin move this to Sir David Llewellyn, 4th Baronet. - Kittybrewster  (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think consensus has to be made first.  What's your reasoning for making this move? Real96 22:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MoS  No 4. But somebody has just told me I can do it myself so I have done it!  :)  - Kittybrewster  (talk) 22:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled