lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moldavian military forces

message: Leaving that aside what do you think about the Romanian word hânsar as a possible etymology for hussar??? The above site says that the word hânsar comes from latin "cursores". Could this etymology be correct, that is it comed into Romanian from early latin, or more probable from the Byzantine cursores, meaning "raiders", which were part of the so called cavarly detachment kabalarioi (see ). And what about the common root with the Romanian armăsar??? I`ve read many times arguments which says that the etymology of armăsar is not from latin admisarius, but that it was borrowed to latin from dacian/sarmatian...
e.g.:
armăsar (D) = admissarius (L) = armăsar. Armăsar este compus din cuvintele dace “armă” şi “sar”, desemnând calul (vezi samsar) care transportă un om înarmat. Corespondentul latin nu mai păstrează forma compusă, aceasta indicând că a fost preluat şi latinizat cu sufixul “us”. La fel a fost preluat în latină şi cuvântul armă ca “arma”.
Any connection? What do you think? (except that I have a probable protochronism crisis, in which case please don`t answer...) Anyway, I hope the site is usefull for this article...  greier 11:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Template talk:Railway stations in Greater Manchester

message: Er... is it okay to edit this? All i was going to do was do a seperate section for Salford stations. Salford Central borders Manchester city centre. Simply south 11:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

message: If nobody minds, i might split this template up slightly into current stations and disused stations, although i could do with some checking after in case i have missed any. Simply south (talk) 12:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One could argue there already is Category:Disused railway stations in Greater Manchester so there is no need to split.  OTOH, the very same category could be used to make sure the split is done correctly :-)--Jotel (talk) 12:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done it but have not had time to do the dashes. Can someone else finish this? Simply south (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (subject to an occasional typo....) --Jotel (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split slightly 

message: The disused stations list was getting unwieldy - it was occupying more height than the nine lists of open stations put together. There was potential for a further increase, since I don't think that the Wigan area has been checked properly; that might yield even more closed stas. Accordingly, I've split them off to Template:Closed stations Greater Manchester, in line with many other counties. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disused stations
Talk:Sassy Pandez

message: I've removed both positive and negative POV stuff including comments on her looks and claims to being the number one British female RnB artist which is not Provable.
Portcullis 11:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article and recent contributions are currently proposed for review at the Conflict of Interest noticeboard. Pending resolution of these issues, the article has been tagged with  to ensure that all participants under the guideline and respond appropriately. Please feel free to join the conversation on this issue at that noticeboard or to discuss issues with the article here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Talk:FirstBank Southwest Tower

message: :Good thing someone has made a stub. I have a picture of it. I'll upload it in Wikimedia Commons. --Who What Where Nguyen Why 03:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great :D I'll just "comment out" the photo request template for now then. --Sherool (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo needed 

message: The article states that "The Tower has a striking resemblance to the One Financial Plaza Building in Fort Lauderdale, Florida" but the link from 'One Financial Plaza' goes to a page for a building of that name in Providence, Rhode Island. 75.75.91.240 14:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Link
Talk:Carlton B. Hutchins

message: His name is spelled "Carlton" on the Army Center of Military History page. Jwillbur 00:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And on the USNA notable alumni page.  So I'm moving the page to its proper spelling. — Rlevse • Talk •  23:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Carleton or Carlton?
Talk:Deadblow

message: The result of the debate was keep.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  12:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadblow]] 

message: * Expansion
* Refs
Chaosdruid (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: Didn't Deadblow score a record number of hits in a Battlebots match? Somewhere well over 100, IIRC, before breaking its weapon. Its original weapon was a titanium rock hammer bolted to an aluminum lever. After that aluminum lever broke, Grant replaced it with a one piece titanium hammer and lever. Bizzybody (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hit record? 

message: "Its most notable use came in 2009 in "Driving in the Dark"..."
Says who?82.83.212.129 (talk) 22:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation effing needed
Talk:Rajiv Gupta (technocrat)

message: With a first look at the article, I wondered if the article was a hoax. However, it doesn't appear to be, going by this. A google search confirms that he was HP's former GM for e-speak business. Borderline notability, imo. --Gurubrahma 12:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax? 

message: I thought there was enough to err on the side of keeping. It is a bit confusing since there is apparently another Rajiv L. Gupta on the board of directors of HP, not this one.  I kept the article saying "father of web services" but just stating that in the article based on one source might be too far. W Nowicki (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ehh fair enough :-) - David Gerard (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Faile (artist collective)

message: The career section should likely be reduced to 10% of its current length, and cleaned up significantly to be something resembling encyclopedic.  It is currently a gushing word salad of art critique, not encyclopedic information. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career section is extremely un-encyclopedic 

message: I have replaced the advert template, as the introduction is gushing, subjective, and very clearly written like an advertisement. 98.234.95.213 (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro reads like an advertisement 

message: I have failed this article, mostly because of several issues with references:
:;Reliability and problems
:*I am not entirely sure if these references are to be trusted, they seem to be unreliable; one of the html links doesn't seem to be functional, another doesn't seem to atcually give any information... the problems go on
:;Number
:*There are only 5 references, and, as pointed out above, many are corrupted in their html format, unreliable, and non-informative.
:;Unsourced claims
:*...pepper the article. Get some references for these claims. I will attempt to put  tags on the statements that need references especially.
Good luck in your improvements to the article. If there are any questions, they should be directed to my talk page. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA fail
Template talk:BritishEmpireWeapons

message: This will obviously be a work in progress, but the idea is to encompass the major weapons (firearms, mainly) of the British Empire 1722-1965 in one handy template! 
I know that technically it stopped being "The British Empire" around 1948, but the British still had significant Colonial holdings overseas until the mid-1960s, hence the 1965 cut-off date for the purposes of this template.
--Commander Zulu 12:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Too wide a timescale in my mind or you will have to be more selective in which case the De Lisle carbine should go to give room to more worthy weapons such as the 18 pdr or the 15 inch gun. GraemeLeggett 13:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: It's a very very broad category of weapons, the template isn't exhaustive, and there are much more thorough templates that can be applied to each kind of weapon... The Land (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this template really needed?
Talk:John C. Morgan

message: A very nice start, with good length and detail, and a nice description of film portrayal. Needs References section. Also, I think it would be nice to standardize the Medal of Honor citations. Take a look at John P. Fardy or John P. Bobo for an example of how other articles have been handling this. Thanks. LordAmeth 16:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: The article says he was a 2nd Lt. in 10/1943 and was captured in 3/44.  I would think at best he finished the war as a Major, more likely a Captain.  The article says he left the service after the war and returned during the Korean conflict and flew stateside cargo aircraft for 2 years.  I then says he retired from the AF as a full Colonel.  He must have served in the guard or reserve after that in order to earn retirement as an O-6, but the article doesn't say so.  --rogerd (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: There must be some information missing
Talk:Business rules approach

message: The paragraph with the technical details was added by a user with the IP 213.164.89.130 --> mx.innovations.de in December '05. Further a user with IP 208.135.53.4 --> gatekeeper.blazesoft.com was editing this article in june '06...
Both companies mentioned in the article as vendors for BRMSs. Therefore I'm not sure how much of this article is not just marketing and maybe need a review...
:Seems pretty neutral to me -- TD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomdebevoise (talk • contribs) 21:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Yan Gamarnik

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Thom Karremans

message: I'm moving this to Thom Karremans to match the Dutch Wikipedia page :nl:Thom Karremans. Tom Harrison Talk 12:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note that the picture which was in this article was incorrect: The picture showed another military, but definitely NOT Thom Karremans. It was also removed from nl:Thom Karremans and from Flickr, and it has been nominated for deletion on Commons. please don't replace. Erik1980 (talk) 09:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Does he live on personal savings or on a Dutch retirement pension? K. is a retiree in Spain now where also nazi war criminals spent their retirement years in the sun and never were extradited. Through his own soldiers he knew very well what was going on as can be proven by press releases. Because of personal fear for his skin, he preferred to down Slivovitz with his Serbian wardens instead of being a soldier and complete his mission. Being a soldier includes the risk of death. K. chose not to take the risk to die himself. Out of recreancy in the face of the enemy he became a collaborator in the massacre through his failure to act.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.157.41.48 (talk) 16:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborator
Talk:Craig Mullins

message: Does anyone feel like adding a picture which better represents his work? - Zelaron 12:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is any of Mullins's art actually used in the Halo games themselves? I thought it was only ever used promotionally, or possibly in the packaging/manuals. --DocumentN (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halo 

message: gooodbrush.com is not more reachable at for this moment. anyone knows what happend to it? 84.56.178.46 (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  gooodbrush.com 
Talk:Cowan, New South Wales

message: "Curiously, Cowan once shared the same postcode as Gosford (2252) until the mid-1990's."
I'd seek clarification on this.  Gosford's postcode is 2250, and has been since I was a child living in the Gosford area in the 1970s, and probably before that.  The postcode 2252 is one used primarily for internal Australia Post purposes, and is allocated not to a locality, but to a sorting facility, the Central Coast Mail Centre, near Gosford.  Cowan has had the postcode 2081 at least since I joined Australia Post in 1990. Brooklyn has 2083.  These place both Cowan and Brooklyn in the "Sydney North" postal region's postcode range, served by mail handling facilities on Sydney's North Shore.  Currently, Cowan's mail is handled by a "Delivery Centre" at the Sydney suburb of Thornleigh. Up until a few years ago, it was handled by a Mail Centre at St Leonards.  To the best of my knowledge, it has never been handled by any facility on the Central Coast.
The Hawkesbury River railway bridge can be considered to represent the border between the "Sydney North" postal region, and the Central Coast one. 
TheLoadedDog 12:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liverpool F.C.

message: I would like to add information on the Liver birds. The following is what I shall write if my request comes back positive: 2 liver birds are shown on top of a building inside the city. They are the exact same in appearance but facing opposite ways. Marloe Collins (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't related to the football club. NapHit (talk) 09:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2024 

message: Dont change until 1/6/24 - thats when he becomes manager Char3290 (talk) 03:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Char3290 (talk) 03:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arne Slot
Talk:List of Plan 9 applications

message: Great job! Just a couple of nits:
* In the "File system and server" there are a few items that are not "applications", for example fossilcons, stat and wstat.
* A few important missing items: upas, factotum, secstore, wikifs and iostats.
I can try to do the changes myself, but as you are doing such a good job organizing everything, I'll let you do it if you like... er. I'm lazy ;) --Lost Goblin 13:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, except for the two points I mentioned, I think you are doing an excellent job; and yes, it is a good way to learn the system. Fixing man pages also is a great way to learn the system ;) --Lost Goblin 16:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great job 

message: I am wondering if we should not change the links to the pages of standard Unix tools, and link the Plan 9 man pages instead.
It is misleading to link to the unix versions of tools that have in some cases changed considerably in Plan 9. Or maybe
adding clarifications to the various relevant articles pointing out that there is a Plan 9 version of that tool with some differences...
--Lost Goblin 20:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is very much a case per-case thing, I just wanted people to keep the issue in mind. --Lost Goblin 14:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading references to Unix tools articles

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mothra (web browser and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Mothra (web browser until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mothra (web browser" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Early music groups

message: Is this category sufficiently separate from :Category:Classical music groups that it shouldn't be a subcategory? I couldn't find it there while editing Tallis scholars and wondered why there seemed to be no subcategory for early music groups until I checked what category The Sixteen was in (which should be and generally is SOP anyway... but it's 9am...) - specificity (?) has its virtues in a case like this, not just being pedantic but it would have helped :) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Flinders University Hall

message: Hey, made a few changes to bring the Uni Hall wikipage to a similar level to those in SAAUCC.
Most notably added right hand info box, logo and other things. This is far from complete, and anyone else who would like to correct me on any errors or help add something. Feel free. Cheers, DaveyChapman, 13:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah mate, add it! It's notable enough considering this is Flinders we're talking about. --121.45.154.6 16:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I'd hardly call it monitoring. I'm making an attempt to keep the other SAAUCC College pages from going through the AfD process like the Mark's page currently is. I don't want to see any of these pages deleted as I, as well as others, think they do actually contribute to wikipedia in a positive manner. If you have a "problem" with my editing, feel free to comment on my talk page. Or, perhaps make some contributions yourself. After all, that's the whole purpose of wikipedia, independant users editing and improving on the pages created by users closely associated with the original articles. Those closely related to an article provide the solid core of the information, and the independant users "clean it up" and make it encyclopedic. Cheers, ABVS1936 16:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...As if "monitoring" is a bad thing. You may be aware that the St Mark's College page was recently nominated for deletion (the result was keep). As a result of the nomination, many references were added and a significant amount of "cruft" removed in order to ensure the page complied with Wikipedia's guidelines (WP:VERIFY and WP:NOTE specifically). The other SAAUCC pages could do with much of the same sort of cleaning up if they are to avoid problems like this too, as they are presently less referenced and more crufty than the St Mark's page was prior to the AfD. Happy to help if someone at the college can point me in the direction of sources.--Yeti Hunter 04:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Monitoring"

message: The Flinders page needs a serious cleanup. It's full of cruft, unreferenced material, irrelevant materiel, and does not assert its notability (though I am not challenging this). I contend that the following do not contribute to the article, and should be removed:
*Much of the history section, specifically the bits about the University, not the Hall, which is largely duplicated at Flinders University
*The team song (unreferenced, unnecessary)
*The house committee list. They are all non-notable individuals, and it adds nothing to the article. Also unreferenced.
Let me know if you think my reasoning is flawed.--Yeti Hunter 02:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page needs cleanup
Talk:Steady state (disambiguation)

message: Hm.  Seems to me that these are all ultimately the same concept.  Surely this should be a page on the general concept of a steady state with links to some examples rather than a disambiguation page?
: I too wonder! why does Steady state redirect to Steady state (disambiguation)? This looks like a classic example of the specific articles being disambiguated without anyone thinking a general article is needed to discuss the basic concept. How should it be resolved? Move the page? Break the redirect? New Stub article? -- Cameron Dewe 07:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be a page on the general concept of a steady state with the specific subjects included under Main page details rather than disambiguation--Light current 07:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page future
Talk:Christopher Lawrence (DJ)

message: * To be compliant, this article needs to provide enough verifiable reliable resources, especially secondary resources and links to the same. Ste4k 13:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: * Please see the guidelines to bring this article up to compliance. Ste4k 13:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for Musicians 
Talk:Ferme générale

message: Somebody with better French than me might check this against the French page (fr:Ferme générale) in relation the names and descriptions of these taxes in particular.  I have sources dome of the description of the taxes from Taille and Gabelle--Grahamec 13:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone else see OR in the "Anticipation of modern tax collecting methods" ? 68.39.174.238 04:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 
Talk:Population geography

message: I don't agree that this page should be merged with demography as  population geography distinguishes itself from demography with the focus on the spatial dimension rather than the temporal dimension. 
--SincereGuy 13:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: :Category has been removed. If anyone has any problems please come to Category_talk:Sociology and discuss. JenLouise 03:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sociology category 

message: * Beaujeu-Garnier, Jacqueline. Demogeografía. Barcelona: Editorial Labor, 1972
* Boserup, Ester: Los determinantes del desarrollo en la agricultura. Madrid: Tecnos, 1967.
* Clarke, John I. Population Geography. Londres: Pergamon Press, 1965.
* Coontz, Sidney H. Teorías de la población y su interpretación económica. México: F.C.E. (Fondo de Cultura Económica), 1960.
* Ehrlich, Paul y Anne. Population, Resources, Environment. Issues in Human Ecology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1970
* George, Pierre. Geografía de la población. Barcelona: Oikos - Tau, editores, 1971
* Kiser, Clyde V. Estudios de demografía. Nueva York, Buenos Aires: Milbank Memorial Fund, 1967.
* Mendoza, Cristóbal. Geografía de la población. En: Tratado de Geografía Humana. Alicia Lindón y Daniel Hiernaux, Directores. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Editorial Anthropos, 2006. 
* Thompson, Warren S. y Thomlinson, Ralph. Problemas demográficos. Controversia sobre el control de la población. México: Editorial Diana, 1969.
* Trewartha, Glenn T. 1953. "A Case for Population Geography." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 43 (2):71-97.
* Trewartha, Glenn. 1969. A Geography of Population: World Patterns. New York: Wiley & Sons.
* Trewartha, Glenn. 1972. The Less Developed Realm: A Geography of its Population. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
* Trewartha, Glenn (ed.). 1977. The More Developed Realm : A Geography of its Population. New York: Pergamon Press.
* Trewartha, Glenn T., Arthur Robinson, and Edwin Hammond. Elements of Geography, Fifth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill,  1967.
* Zelinsky, Wilbur. Introducción a la Geografía de la población. Barcelona: Editorial Vicens-Vives, 1973
Most of these books were originally written in English. It is very important to include the article from Trewartha from 1953, since it was the begining of the whole topic. --Fev 13:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish WP Reflist

message: *This article has a very much greater importance in Spanish than English regarding the number of visits: https://tools.wmflabs.org/langviews/?project=es.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-60&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&page=Geograf%C3%ADa_de_la_poblaci%C3%B3n
*I think English language have all kind of tools to improve this article. Le's work on it! --Fev 13:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish WP 

message: Let's talk about rural, urban migration 41.57.95.62 (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography rural , urban migration