Talk:Anti-revisionism (Marxism–Leninism)

message: I removed Party for Socialism and Liberation and their presidential candidate from this article. PSL is not an anti-revisionist party, they explicitly come out of a Trotskyist milieu and history.
--Riot Fred (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Party for Socialism and Liberation

message: Removed Pol Pot because he did not follow the Anti-Revisionist line.
Removed Prachanda because he revised marxism and established a parliamentary instead of a socialist republic, and is thus not an anti-revisionist.
Before putting them back in, post here why.
I am removing your edit. Please someone block any obvious POV edits to this page.--24.44.187.72 (talk) 22:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Prachanda does not belong in this page because he's a revisionist, this is common sense and not “POV“. Removed again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.136.218 (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agreeing with the remover of Prachanda because anyone educated in basic Leninist theory knows that a leader of a Maoist party that won a 10 year long civil war against an age old monarchy, only to share power with several other bourgeoisie parties and set up a modern day social-democrat republic, is, clearly, revisionist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.211.252 (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

text: At least say why. I am removing him because neither of you have shown any proof he's anti revisionist, even if he's made claims in the past, my example from today is bloody obvious enough (starting up a capitalist power sharing republic). I will also be re-adding Khorloogiin Choibalsan, reading through his wiki article alone is enough to show he was a devout fan of Stalin and anti-revisionist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.211.252 (talk) 13:22, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Fair enough on Choibalsan. I didn't read the intro to anti-revisionist leaders properly and yes, if you compare my arguements with the paragraph's definition it is POV. Apologies for childish stubborness.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.211.252 (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning the “Anti-revisionist leaders“

message: I don't think that there is need to merge this article with Maoism. Even juche communists claim themselves as anti-revisionists because Kim Il Sung opposed Khrushchevite-Brezhnevite social-imperialism. --219.64.186.3, 18:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: You could make a case that Sung was Anti-Revisionist, but what about his son? I don't really see how he is Anti-Revisionist nor have ever seen him show any traits/condemn revisionism. --Mrdie 12:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim Jong Il? 

message: I added Che Guevara as it's widely known among the radical left movement that Che was an admirer of Stalin and Mao in the 60's, and a critic of revisionism. Please say why not if you disagree.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.211.252 (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Che Guevara 

message: Comrade José should be removed he is a Revisionist anti-Maoist, the Shining Path leadership has denounce José and his Shining Path remnant group operating in VRAE which no longer follow Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.238.220 (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comrade José 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Anti-revisionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928061307/http://www.philippinerevolution.net/cgi-bin/cpp/pdocs.pl?id=stane;page=01 to http://www.philippinerevolution.net/cgi-bin/cpp/pdocs.pl?id=stane;page=01
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Anti-revisionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927221903/http://www.stalinsociety.org.uk/lies.html to http://www.stalinsociety.org.uk/lies.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.philippinerevolution.net/cgi-bin/cpp/pdocs.pl?id=stane%3Bpage%3D01
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It appears that this article consists entirely of original research, as not a single source is cited throughout the entire article (except for citing a Stalin book to itself). The only sources listed in the external links are pamphlets and articles by Marxist-Leninist political parties and authors, so aren't exactly reliable independent sources. I'm partial to dynamiting this article unless people can provide some reliable sourcing for literally anything contained in it. -- Grnrchst (talk) 08:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research