lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Naartjie

message: Actually, the Tavern of the Seas was written by the author Lawrence Greene not Graham Green.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.119.189.25 (talk) 21:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham Green 

message: The Satsuma is very different from the local Naartjie. Naartjies are usualy quite small and have a hard skin. Taste is quite sharp with a strong citrus tang very close to a lemon. Satusam's on the other hand are larger, and have a loose and softer skin. The segments are easily pulled apart, taste is very sweet and less acidic than the naartjie. Manderins and Satsuma's are virtually identical, except the Manderin is usually a lot smaller than either three.
Reply: Hmm... growing up in S.A. I'm not familiar with satsuma's or manderins but indeed with naartjies. Naartjies' vary quite a bit in sweetness (and some other less obvious factors) in my experience of eating naartjies every winter since I can remember. I can't give citation for this, of course, but seeing that what you state above is written in the article, I raise the question as to how much experience you have with the fruits mentioned. In other words, it boils down to the old Wiki adage of "citation needed" (no matter how right you are). 165.146.86.123 (talk) 17:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the Naartjie a hybrid or local varient?

message: I would like to merge this page with Citrus unshiu, but first that needs to be the result of moving Satsuma (fruit) to the scientific name (in accordance with the policy of Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants. This would allow an integrated discussion of the different names and the different varieties. Nadiatalent (talk) 14:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The merger was not contested, and is now complete. Nadiatalent (talk) 23:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Nucellar embryony

message: A recent change added that this is a type of asexual reproduction. I've removed that because the endosperm is still fertilized, which technically means that it is sexual reproduction. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asexual reproduction 

message: Can someone put together a Zygotic Embryony article in Wikipedia?  We need this contrast with the Nucellar Embryony article.  The main motivations for this are 1.) many people are motivated to grow fruit trees for food and want to understand their options for clonal and non-clonal propagation, and 2) the question of genetic mutation as a mechanism of adaptation to help with this understanding.  Can we answer this question about whether genetic mutation is present in Zygotic Embryony but not Nucellar Embryony?  Our subconscious minds are trying to make the appropriate connections, to understand what's going on, to guide our choices/strategies in producing our food.  Let's put Wikipedia to work for us in this pursuit.  Rtdrury (talk) 23:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  zygotic embryony
Talk:Citrus depressa

message: The bottle I bought tonight at Kaldi is from Okinawa and romanizes it as "Shequasar". --Jcayzac (talk) 13:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization 

message: Citrus depressa is considered a synonym of Citrus reticulata by The Plant List. Also see Citrus taxonomy. DCDuring (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy
Talk:Acer saccharinum

message: Anyone want to say why they thought silver and sugar maple should be merged? They are two completely different species, both with decent pages -ChristopherM 01:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I'd like to propose that Freeman maple should have its own page. It should tie as closely to Acer rubrum as to A. saccharinum, and a separate page would allow expansion. Nadiatalent (talk) 14:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeman maple 

message: I have added swamp maple as another "common" name for silver maple. I can't give a citation for this addition except to say that that is what my father called it when I was growing up in Eastern Ontario.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.22.179 (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: CItation found. Now the only one without a citation is Creek Maple. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Swamp Maple
Talk:Koelreuteria paniculata

message: I went looking for the actual article in which Koelreuteria paniculata is published for the first time. The reference to Kew states 1772 as the publication date, but Internet Archive states 1771. I have not changed the date in the article, but have contacted Kew to confirm the date on their end, and added an additional reference to the exact article. If Kew changes its date, I will update the article to match. Danielittlewood (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Rafaël Govaerts replied to correct me - the publication date *is* 1772, 1771 is the year the volume refers to. IA has the wrong publication date (1748) so I will try to get them to correct it. My citation should also be up to date now. Danielittlewood (talk) 14:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact publication date
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Applej12

message: User:applej12
      run at Sun Mar 11 20:58:22 2007 GMT
Mainspace	2
Talk:	1
User talk:	2
User:	1
Wikipedia:	2
avg edits per article	1.33
earliest	00:00, 11 March 2007
number of unique pages	6
total	8
2007/3 	8 	
applej12's editcount summary stats as of 20:58, March 11th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 21:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Alectryon (plant)

message: An editor has been persistently adding a link to Fickr in the "External links" section. External links should conform to normal WP:RS. Flickr is a crowd-sourced repository of information with no editorial control. There is no way of knowing if the images linked to are even of Alectryon plants. It clearly fails WP:RS standards. Sites that fail to meet criteria for reliable sources may be included if they contain information about the subject from knowledgeable sources. However Flickr is not "from knowledgeable sources" as far as we can ascertain, and a page of photos is scarcely "information" in the normal sense. Moreover, the "Further Reading" section is intended to help readers "learn more about the article subject". This article already has an extensive gallery, and a link to the Wikimedia page. I'm having difficulty seeing what more a reader would learn from the Flickr page. As such I have removed the link. Mark Marathon (talk) 05:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with a page of photos is scarcely "information" in the normal sense.  Not only is there the proverb that a picture is worth a thousand words, images are routinely cataloged and indexed as information. --Bejnar (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of links to Flickr 

message: # https://novon.mobot.org/index.php/novon/article/view/147
# https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321228866_Alectryon_vitiensis_A_New_Species_of_Sapindaceae_Endemic_to_Fiji
# https://bioone.org/journals/Novon-A-Journal-for-Botanical-Nomenclature/volume-25/issue-4/D-16-00006/Alectryon-vitiensis--A-New-Species-of-Sapindaceae-Endemic-to/10.3417/D-16-00006.short
AnBuKu (talk) 07:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe to be added: Alectryon vitiensis ?
Talk:Aesculus flava

message: — Assignment last updated by Isoetid (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Dendrology BIOL 3509
Talk:Dodonaea viscosa

message: I don't think there is a need for that banner anymore, is there? I'm removing it as there is no [reference needed] in the whole article. If you feel I'm wrong, feel free to put it back, but please explain. Thouny (talk) 00:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of references 
Talk:Neprilysin

message: Is CD 10 the same as Common Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Antigen (CALLA)?
If so, wouldn't this be an important thing to mention in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.73.149.236 (talk) 04:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is and it would be. I'm going to fix this but it should probably go into more depth about its role as a tumor marker. Kajerm 19:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768982
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Review
Sean P. Murphy, MB, BCh, BAO1; Nasrien E. Ibrahim, MD2,3; James L. Januzzi Jr, MD2,3,4
JAMA. 2020;324(5):488-504.
August 4, 2020
doi:10.1001/jama.2020.10262
"The cornerstone of guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF involves inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems and augmentation of favorable pathways with inhibition of neprilysin, a neutral endopeptidase that degrades several peptides involved in regulating cardiovascular and renal homeostasis and metabolism."
--Nbauman (talk) 04:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cornerstone" of treatment in heart failure
Talk:Skellig Islands

message: Didn't Skellig Michael appear at the end of a Werner Herzog movie?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.8.246.180 (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film appearances

message: In the 'Witcher' books and video games 'Skellige' is a location visited by the protagonist. In the video game 'The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt', the inhabitants of Skellige speak with an Irish accent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:2A0:1410:804C:A0E3:C0B6:14D7:A311 (talk) 06:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Video games
Talk:Alfa Romeo Scighera

message: There is double page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italdesign_Schigera (wrong spelled) which should be deleted --Typ932 21:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  --Interiot 02:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate page

message: What does the name "Schighera" mean? I seem to remember something about it being the name of a type of cat. I tried to translate it on some websites, but nothing came up. Any ideas? PowderedToastMan (talk) 00:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name meaning?

message: Name of the car is Alfa Romeo Scighera, also according to Italdesing site.  --Typ932 T·C 10:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no objections, I've moved it.--Aervanath (talk) 12:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Acer japonicum

message: Is now a time to plant the Acer
Japonica?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:1E07:B98:7137:72C2:466B:546C (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Poetic justice

message: I think something should be added about the saying "Let the dead bury the dead," but I don't know where to put it.
Jesin 21:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A thing 

message: "Aristotle says that poetry is superior to history in that it shows what should or must occur, rather than merely what does occur." Where is the citation for this? I am not able to find a phrase supporting this in Aristotle's Poetics Bryannd 06:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At [] I found Let us now return to the points of contrast between poetry and history. Recall that there are two. First, poetry represents universals and history particulars, a difference that makes poetry more philosophical than history (9.1451a38-b7). Second, whereas poems (specifically, tragedies and epics) imitate a single, complete and whole action, a history concerns all the events in a single time that happened to one or more people and that relate to each other at random and have no single end (23.1459a17-30). Since a universal is a kind of unity (see Met. ƒ.26.1023b29-32), both contrasts are ways of saying that poems are unities and histories are not or are much less so.  O'RyanW (☺  ₪) 07:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poetry vs. history 

message: Seriously people get your act together. Look at this garbage. The entire page is a list of examples.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.75.158 (talk) 11:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this wikipedia or TVTropes 

message: References are needed to verify the information in this article.-- Isaidnoway (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References needed 

message: Contrapasso and Karma are two concepts from older literature that make use of ironic twists of fate to bring about poetic justice. Despite that, one of the first lines reads "In modern literature, it is often accompanied by an ironic twist of fate related to the character's own action." This sounds to me like 'only modern literature has ironic twists'. I don't think this is true.
AustinPrince13 (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ironic twists are only present in modern literature?
Talk:Acer crataegifolium

message: In my experience, at least, the resemblance to Hawthorn is not at all fanciful. I saw one of these in Montreal, and thought I was looking at a Hawthorn till I noticed the Maple keys. The leaves and branching habit looked exactly like a Hawthorn that grew next to my house in New England. kebec1 (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Capparales

message: Any objection to making this a redirect to Brassicales?  That article is already more developed than this one, and covers various treatments of the order (under either name).  The order seems to have mostly the same circumscription under either name. Kingdon (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect to [[Brassicales]]?
Talk:Loop heat pipe

message: Maybe it is just me but I have a hard time grasping the concepts of heat transfer and need to have it as simplified as possible.  All the articles I could find on LHPs are very technical limiting my ability to accurately describe them.  Also, I don't think the limitations section is necessary at its current length, it could be pared down and moved into origins and the remainder merged into heat pipes.  Maybe I will attack this again but right now my brain hurts. MDSNYDER 21:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liénard–Wiechert potential

message: Danger, the article at present is nutter jumble at the start.  Please consult the original paper by Feynman and Wheeler for a pretty damn lucid introduction.  ;) 168.105.107.215 (talk) 07:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a throwaway line in the lede: " The Liénard–Wiechert potentials can be generalized according to gauge theory." We need an explanation or expansion of this. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed an obscurity. Is there an expression available for these potentials in the Coulomb gauge? Xxanthippe (talk) 00:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: that question is meaningless since they arise from the lorenz gauge. The coulomb gauge is the worst for that question, all potentials are instantaneous in coulomb gauge so they don't "propagate". omg Klinfran (talk) 00:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Equations have to be revised?

message: The vector potential A is a function of time AND position. Therefore the electric field uses the PARTIAL derivative of A with respect to t, not the "straight" one. Big mistake.Klinfran (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: There are some statements in this section that require sources and clarification as to whether the particular statement is consensus in the field. For instance, the following statements are definitely not consensus: "Advanced fields are absorbed by the charges"; the "zero point field [was] discovered by Planck" (the existence of such a field is disputed)
I will turn this into a Disputed section.  129.118.34.92 (talk) 17:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Charged extended particles can experience self-oscillatory dynamics as a result of classical electrodynamic self-interactions \cite{}. This trembling motion has a frequency that is closely related to the zitterbewegung frequency appearing in Dirac's equation. The mechanism producing these fluctuations relies on radiation reaction as appearing in the Abraham-Lorentz force, and arises because some parts of an accelerated charged corpuscle emit electromagnetic perturbations that can affect another part of the body, producing self-forces. Using the Liénard-Wiechert potential as solutions to Maxwell's equations with sources, it can be shown that these forces can be described in terms of state-dependent delay differential equations, which display limit cycle behavior. Alvaro12Lopez (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implications
Talk:Comics in Australia

message: This page needs some help with grammar... but more importanly, it needs somebody to go through those lists.  They are entirely too long and too "red."  If the author isn't worthy of his/her own article on WP, then they probably don't deserve to be mentioned in a list.  Lists in articles should be limited and secondary.  On this article, they are about 60% of the article, and it appears as if most aren't really notable.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 14:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of the history if not all seems straight out of Ryan's Panel which probably needs to be cited instead of all the CN notes. MartinSFSA (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs help 

message: Or maybe 'Comic strips & cartoons in Australia'?
To disambiguate 'comics' from meaning 'comedians'.--Tyranny Sue (talk) 00:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal of less ambiguous name for topic, e.g. Australian cartoons and comic strips?

message: This needs to go - there's already a section on Australian comics creators in "List of Comic Creators". Bot is reverting me at the moment. Hmm. GoldFroggy (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Enormous list of comics creators
Talk:Priddy's Hard

message: Wasn't there a detonation of explosives in a silo there, probably in the early 1950s? If so,it might be mentioned. Seadowns (talk) 16:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume you mean the Bedenham pier explosion in 1950? That's now on the DM Gosport page, as it was within the bounds of the modern site. --ERAGON (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explosion 

message: Gunpowder is a low explosive used as a propellant. It does not detonate. explosion and detonation are not synonyms Humphrey Tribble (talk) 08:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  explode versus detonate
Talk:Polysomnogram

message: This article, at present, lacks appropriate sources supporting any of the information contained therein.  I'm hoping this is only a temporary problem. Rklawton 21:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Both the Polysomnography article and the Polysomnogram article are fascinating and informative.  However, there is necessarily a lot of repetition.  Ideally, someone who knows a lot about these things should combine the articles and redirect from Polysomnogram to Polysomnography.  (I've put this same comment on the Polysomnography talk page.)  Hordaland 15:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support such a merge. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, merge. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 12:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Hordaland, could you perform the merge? This doesn't sound controversial, but some duplicate information needs to be eliminated. JFW | T@lk 15:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have done some work on Polysomnography.  Not started yet on Polysomnogram.  References are lacking.  The one has one ref from 1953.  The other a list of ISBNs.  And a bunch of external links; most or all from USA.  I intend to get back at this... - Hordaland (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just completed the merge.  --Scott Alter 03:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine two articles?
Talk:Insect bites and stings

message: A section including information about treatment and identification of what kind of bite would is quite crucial and would not be too hard a task to take on.DerBarJude (talk) 04:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment

message: The colloquialism "bug bite" really does include tick bites and spider bites and it seems to be a mistake to redirect the term to insect bites and not have some sort of "Bug Bites" article which then branches off.  One problem with this article and related articles about stings and bites is whether to be technically accurate or colloquially informative.  On the one hand I favor technical accuracy --  a solitary bee ground aggregation is not the same as a wasp (yellowjacket) colony, etc., and a spider is not an insect.  But there is a brush off both here and under bee sting that drops major chunks of information because the terminology is technically inaccurate.  (I'm not quibbling with the spider bite article, but with the redirect; I am disagreeing with the bee stings article, but discussion on that will be there.)
There also seems to be a need to acknowledge the role of disease transmission, even if superficially, in this and / or the proposed Bug Bites article.  Parts of the articles on Hematophagy and Vector_(epidemiology) could be included here or in the Bug Bites article. Insect STINGS are directly more reactive -- swelling for most, anaphylaxis for some.  As noted, insect BITES are not venomous some bites are startling but probably safe (lady beetle e.g.), but many insect and arthropod BITES are responsible for significant transmission of disease -- fleas , ticks, mosquitos.  Ticks, not being insects, are omitted here but can transmit disease and would be included under bug bites, as would be venomous spider bites.
GeeBee60 (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug bite redirect; secondary reactions, etc. 

message: Mosquito bites should have its own article about the subject, like in other articles specifically about the bites/stings caused by insects, or mainly about the bites/stings the insects cause. (bee stings, bed bugs, etc.) Please let me know if this is possible.
Many thanks, 
--Eye ay en (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosquito Bites 

message: good 196.249.92.167 (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  insects bites 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mhrichards (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor
Talk:Inserm

message: Suggest move to Acronym INSERM - English speakers will not be looking for French expanded name. Commonly considered INSERM by english sources.--ZayZayEM (talk) 01:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym 

message: This article was moved without previous discussion to an English title. However, INSERM is hardly known under the English translation of its name. If anything, it's known outside of France as "INSERM". I propose to move the article back to its full French name, with the English name and "INSERM" being kept as redirects to that name. --Randykitty (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved per alternate proposal. Andrewa (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: French Institute of Health and Medical Research →  – harmonization with wikidata object name + english title has no usage – talking Cherry 08:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink).  Philg88 ♦talk 15:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 August 2016 
Talk:Intermittent photic stimulation

message: The corresponding German article can be found here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photostimulation
(It wrongly links to the Englich article Photostimulation.)
I'd love to add a link to it to this page, but unfortunately that's impossible since Wikipedia introduced its uttterly incomprehensible new link system.
If anyone out there is able to understand it, it would be a useful addition.
5.10.152.24 (talk) 11:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to corresponding German article