Talk:SpiceJet

message: I was just about to write a question asking whether they did charter flights as the photo of the aircraft in spiceJet colours is taken in Mallorca. However, as you'll notice, there's no titles on the plane in the picture and, having found the original on airliners.net, it says the following: "Getting ready for delivery to new Indian startup SpiceJet from Futura!"  Also note that the plane holds an Irish registration as Futura Airlines has Dublin as a base. Hopefully that might save someone else a few minutes trying to uncover the reason for these anomalies! Iancaddy 00:12, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the picture is in Mallorca

message: I was looking at flights between Kolkata and Chennai last summer and I saw one labelled 0S521. However, 0S is not labelled in the IATA airline designator. However, when you search 0S it leads you to the SpiceJet page, where the IATA code is SG which is on the IATA listing (along with Canada's defunct JetsGo). So I'm curious, was SpiceJet formerly 0S and is now SG, or vice-versa, or what?
JamesyWamesy 06:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SG or 0S ? 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Does it make sense to list aircraft names? Where is the encyclopedic value? Names are just stickers applied to the aircraft fuselage, so I cannot see why they should be of any interest. Remeber that Wikipedia is not a database for enthusiasts, but rather an encyclopedia for the general interested ones. Many airlines have given names to their aircraft, but a listing like in this article is quite rare. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft names 

message: The timely performance of an airline is a performance criteria, and if Spicejet has been reported as the worst hit in terms of delays in reliable media/ news articles - then that fact needs to stay.Sunyrai (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delays 

message: These edits are undue in the article besides being unencyclopedic and must be removed. — Abhishek  Talk 16:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You may refer my talk page. Sunyrai (talk) 07:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue 

message: Statements like "Each of SpiceJet's employee is trained to behave in a smart, friendly and efficient manner so that they ensure every passenger feels welcome and looked after. The pilots and flight attendants are all well experienced. SpiceJet also heavily invests in safety of the passengers and maintenance of the aircraft" have been copied and pasted from the Spicejet Website's Corporate overview section. This is mere advertisement and copying material from other websites word-for-word is against Wiki policy WP:COPY Sunyrai (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone simply shifted the "Each of SpiceJet's employee is trained to behave in a smart, friendly and efficient manner ..." statement from a lower section to the header section. That does not solve the problem. It is still a copy and an an advertisement and not in line with wiki policy WP:POVSunyrai (talk) 06:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: You had reverted the Jeeja Ghosh story when it was placed here first. Now again you are doing an edit war. You may refer my talk page for answer to why this story needs to stay. It is an issue of national importance and if not in the title, but the update should be present of the airlines attitude where the issue was mentioned.Sunyrai (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Abhishek, you removed the delay issue multiple times. It remains in the article. I have answered your BRD citation in my talk page. Someone removed Jeeja Ghosh issue when it was put here for the first time as undue. It remains. Therefore latest development on this issue also has to remain. Do not engage in edit war. Sunyrai (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing issue

message: In the Accidents and incidents section of this page, there is a photo labeled 'A SpiceJet Q400. The kind of aircraft used in flight SG 913', but there is no mention of this in the text, only of SG219. Could someone either remove the photo or add info about SG913?Airlinesguy (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: SG913 Picture

message: Hi
I would like share some good photographs which i clicked from the aircraft last month
I flew on Spicejet from Ahmedabad to Hyderabad and was lucky enough to get some lovely sunrise pics.
I wanted to share them with you if possible put them up in your office.
If i am allowed to show them to someone in Hyderabad office it would be very kind of you.
waiting for your reply
Thanks a lot
Vishwanath
you could reply to my mail ID
my phone 9010868364
vishecil@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.224.105 (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you trying to contact SpiceJet?  If so this is the wrong place to do so, because this Wikipedia article has absolutely no affiliation or connection with SpiceJet itself.  You won't get a response from the airline here.  —Compdude123 01:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  photographs 

message: A Google image search for Spicejet + Crash reveals several crashes,  where is the section here? Torbenlicht2015 (talk) 07:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crashes and incidents 

message: First paragraph describes SpiceJet as India's third largest airline in terms of market-share, ahead of Air India. The source cited for this claim is dubious, because it only mentions the market-share of airlines on domestic routes. Air India is a largely international airline, with over 40 widebody aircraft. There's no way that SpiceJet has an overall higher market share than Air India. Correct this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btarunr (talk • contribs) 12:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spicejet market-share link dubious 

message: I don't know why the user that started the proposal did not provide their rationale. I say no to the merger as the destinations table is long enough to warrant a stand-alone article.--Jetstreamer  13:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of destinations article into SpiceJet 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: This incident has been covered by many media sources and is noteworthy enough to mention in this article.VR talk 21:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOTNEWS.--Jetstreamer  02:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you give a bit more detailed explanation as to why you removed this?VR talk 03:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not notable and nobody will remember this in a month or later.--Jetstreamer  11:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Have to agree hardly of note or relevance to the airline. MilborneOne (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was not notable than why was it covered by multiple news sources, including international media?VR talk 16:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Being in the news doesnt make it encyclopedic or relevant to this article. MilborneOne (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents 

message: SpiceJet’s article has been showing 17 737-700BDSF on order for a long time but without any cited sources. Shouldn’t it be removed? The other citations for the table don’t support it either. AlphaBravo178 (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: added .--Jetstreamer  20:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  737-700BDSF Orders 

message: What ever happened to the 90 seat Dash 8 Q400s? According to Planespotters.net, the airline still has 5 of them. Why does the fleet section only list 78 seats? Mirza Ahmed (talk) 06:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Planespotters is not reliable per WP:PLANESPOTTERS.--Jetstreamer  11:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  90 seat Q400s 

message: the airline has gone through some financial issues in 2023, and is planning to recover losses and is initiating huge fundings. 
Should this not be added in the article (with reference) ? Aviator Jr (talk) 08:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpiceJet financial turbulence (2023-present)