Talk:Serpent (instrument)

message: Removed text:
, and eventually evolved into the saxophone
I don't think that's accurate. Certainly one of the Sax family (I forget which) was noted as a competent serpent player, but I think it's a stretch to say either the serpent or ophicleide was a direct ancestor of the saxophone. Willing to be proven wrong of course! Andrewa 05:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text

message: It might be a little silly, but I spotted a serpent being played in the ensemble in one of the scenes in Pride and Prejudice (TV serial).  anybody else have any sightings?  --W0lfie 01:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A woman used to attend Tubachristmas events in the southern New England area and play the serpent. I haven't seen her recently. Counterfit 05:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

text: In the 1956 film The Case of the Mukkinese Battle Horn (starring Peter_Sellers, Spike_Milligan and Dick_Emery), the eponymous instrument appears to be a serpent. Heraldica (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:   I don't know why it's taken me 14 years, but I've added a sentence to the film page! — Jon (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

text: @Riaanvn the music video for "Frontier Psychiatrist" by The Avalanches features the serpent. Perhaps we need a § In popular culture Jon (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serpent sighting 

message: Jerry Goldsmith used the serpent in his score to Alien. It's sometimes part of the orchestral fabric but, every now and then, it gets a solo! Gingermint (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I just found it on the Internet when googling, and saw your edit on this page after an entry to section In popular culture. Riaanvn (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alien 

message: This section seems very confusing to me. I think it could be written better. I have never played a serpent, but I was a dulcian player, and also played numerous other Rennaisance instruments starting about 30 years ago.  Anthony Baines in his books describes the serpent very well. Perhaps his books could be used as a reference for the unique characteristics of the serpent.  
As I understand it, the lower hand supports the instrument and therefore the three fingers used are in the reverse order compared to straight woodwinds such as recorders, clarinets, etc. This section in the article could express that idea, but as it stands, it does not. 
Just pointing it out. Nice to see such an article in Wikipedia.  I am not prepared to do the editing. I read and make suggestions. Thank you.
69.166.29.13 (talk) 14:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  characteristics 

message: The article is confusing at this point. The normal serpent is a BASS instrument, not a tenor. 
This section needs to be amended.  I am a reader of Wikipedia and I rarely edit things, except for the few little grammar things I see.  I don't rewrite much of anything.  I am just suggesting that there is a problem here. I have played Rennaisance instruments for 30 years. Perhaps one of the editors will sort out this obvious error and re-do it. 
69.166.29.13 (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Contrabass ("anaconda"), Tenor ("serpent") and Soprano ("worm"). 

message: "However, later models added keys as on a clarinet"...
I think that is midleading.  What sort of clarinet?  Maybe the earliest clarinets made by Denner, but not the modern clarinet. Many people reading this article will think that the serpent had modern key systems added.  The serpent had keys added, yes... but they were like the keys added to the Dulcian, and the Crumhorn. 
Thank you. I am not amending the article, just suggesting repairs to it.  I was involved in old music for 30 years. Recently sold my Dulcian and other inmstuments after health issues. So, just looking at articles here on Wikipedia, and suggesting ways in which things could be improved.
69.166.29.13 (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  However, later models added keys as on a clarinet 

message: The first sentence says the serpent is not related to the cornett. This is followed almost immediately with a sentence saying it is closely related to the cornett, though not descended from. Suggest a different word than "related" in order to clear up the contradiction. 24.217.34.210 (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I wonder if the first one is a reference to the Cornet (with one "t"), but if so, that statement should go after the one saying the serpent is related to the Cornett (with two "t"s) as a clarification since "cornett" and "cornet" are nearly identical words but refer to two different instruments not related to each other. — al-Shimoni (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest using language similar to Britannica: "It was probably invented in 1590 by Edme Guillaume, a French canon of Auxerre, as an improvement on bass versions of the closely related cornett." 2600:1700:30D0:2390:653E:2E87:3261:814E (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This page regarding the lizard clearly places it as midway between the cornett and the serpent: https://www.music.iastate.edu/antiqua/instrument/lizard 2600:1700:30D0:2390:9CBF:3620:43AD:A277 (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to cornett 

message: The article barely mentions Christopher Monk, who possibly even deserves his own page(?). History section needs a "modern revival" section, covering his work, the English Serpent Trio, revival of interest spread to Europe and North America (Doug Yeo, others), use in historically informed performance practice, and so on. Dumping this here as a note-to-self, or in case someone else notices it and wants to get started.—Jon (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern revival 

message: I've added CC-BY photographs of the truly stupendously large 1840 restored contrabass serpent (sometimes called the "anaconda") from Musical Instrument Museums Edinburgh to Commons, ready for deployment here at some stage (1, 2). Good refs in Bevan's Tuba Family (2nd ed.), the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Brass Instruments, and Doug Yeo's Illustrated Dictionary. — Jon (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anaconda 

message: For some reason (probably an excess of enthusiasm combined with its lack of citations) some of the material from earlier revisions has been removed, covering historical repertoire, playing technique, methods, fingerings in particular. I'll have a go at re-introducing it with citations (Myers, Baines, Bevan, Yeo, etc.) Jon (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing technique, historical repertoire 

message: The redirect Worn (instrument) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 19:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that was me, sorry - a silly typo.—Jon (talk) 06:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Worn (instrument)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The third sentence in the lede is ridiculous: "It is named for its long, conical bore bent into a snakelike shape, and unlike most brass instruments is made from wood..."
A "brass" instrument made from "wood"?  The Hornbostel–Sachs classification	is 423.213; there is no "brass" category in Hornbostel-Sachs.  The instrument category is:  an aerophone with an enclosed air column that is set into vibration directly by the player's lips.  Most such aerophones are, indeed, made of metal, usually brass, but some are made of wood or other materials (e.g., bone).   
A "brass" instrument is an instrument in this category that is made of brass.  Other instruments in the category share characteristics with brass instruments, but are not themselves "brass instruments"; the serpent is one of these.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a "brass" instrument