lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James Swallow

message: Seems the link to his homepage is banned (you get a spam filter page if you try to edit the link so it works. It can be removed  but I wanted to check out why. Is it because it is AOL? (Emperor 03:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just ran it through http://tweetl.com because tinyurl.com doesn't get through it either. :P --QUADRATUS (speak to me, human) (yes i've been here) (vote saxon) 17:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link banned
Talk:Ian Watson (author)

message: Two stories on their own is no good to anyone. The page should either list all of Ian's short stories, or none of them. It's about him, after all - not Warhammer 40K fiction. And he's written a lot of short fiction :-)Tanzeelat (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These are needed. --Beyond silence 16:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are they needed? Let's not get into an edit war. The bibliography as it was originally gave details of novels, novellas and collections. If you want to add the Warhammer 40K stories, then we should add all of Ian's short fiction. Or create a separate page for the Deathwing anthology.Tanzeelat (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: We give YoB 1943 in the lead sentence and PoB St Albans, England, in the hidden footer template .
External link ISFDB gives North Shields, Northumberland, England, UK;
20 April 1943 . SFE gives St Albans, Hertfordshire: 20 April 1943 .
SFE should be used more generally as a source. --P64 (talk) 22:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital data 

message: This article should cite more in the text. DemonDays64 (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more sources
Talk:Rocket Mortgage

message: The redirect Bedrock Detroit has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 07:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bedrock Detroit]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Baron Trimlestown

message: A nearly 800 yr old title probably has an heir but that heir is unknown.Alci12 14:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What do we think of this "no legal recognition" and "styled"? Cutler 12:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ODNB says 

message: The blue link for attainded in this article redirects to attainder. In that article, attainted seems to be the only verb used, rather than attainded. Which is correct? Editrite! (talk) 03:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attainded or attainted?
Talk:List of obscure nerdcore artists

message: This is an attempt to end the stupid debate on the nerdcore talk page. Please don't delete it. Be part of the solution, not the problem. Perle 14:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Spinning this off into a seperate page doesn't do anything to address verifiability concerns.  Friday (talk) 14:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it does; it is only links, categorized in the weakest possible way. Isn't a link verified by its existence? Perle 15:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Laughing God

message: removed reference to vauls surviving the fall of the eldar
Removed non-objective opinion-based interpretations of the 40k background regarding the Laughing God and the Deceiver. It is an encyclopaedia. Stick to the facts.  GW intentionally left this vague.  Save your interpretations for discussion forums.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.92.207.143 (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Machine God

message: I propose that this page gets merged with the Machine Spirit spirit page under the title Machine God (Warhammer 40,000). The two are closely related and deal with the same philosophy/understanding. I will do this soon, seeing as how no one ever bothers with these pages anymore. Any suggestions, please say. SanchiTachi 22:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal
Talk:Fabius Bile

message: Fabuis Bile was NOT an Apothecary! He used to be the Legion's Lieutenant Commander! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.10.59.231 (talk • contribs) .
:Acutally, yes he was; read the Horus Heresy Trilogy. The Haunted Angel (The Forest Whispers My Name) 19:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please add a citation to the article documenting this fact, in accordance with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability? Cheers --Pak21 08:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error
Talk:Commander Farsight (Warhammer 40,000)

message: Can somebody confirm Farsight's spelling in the new Codex? The GW website is still using 'Kaius'. Cheers --Pak21 17:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? I notice an anon IP has just reverted back to using "Kaius". Cheers --Pak21 10:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well the spelling giving on the official site is Shas'o Viorla Shovah Kaius Montyr? Lowris 11:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is an edit stating the new Codex spells it 'Kais' :-) Cheers --Pak21 16:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  hmmm i dont have access to a copy, a friend of mine plays tau though, hopefully he has the new codex, ill ask him asap and see if we can get the spelling verified Lowris 16:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Kais. Tar7arus 21:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: The article states that Farsight cadres cannot take any alien auxiliaries. Shouldn't we note Gue'vesa as an exception? They didn't make it into any of the Codices, but they still appear on the GW website and in Imperial Armour 3. 129.11.76.215 13:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Aliens?
Talk:Logan Grimnar

message: (Disclaimer: I've only read the Space Wolves omni featuring Ragnar.)  Is there a fiction or codex reference for that last bit about the Space Wolves engaging in warfare against the Imperium but basically being let off the hook? -MalkavianX 02:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wars against the Imperium?

message: The only reference here is the Space Wolves rulebook, and last I checked it didn;t mention half this stuff. Specifically the stuff about Armageddon and combat with Imperial Forces. Furthermore, when you write this stuff, explain it like the person your explaining to knows absolutley nothing about the subject. What is the true nature of the First Armageddon War? What lesser Imperial agents?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Khârn the Betrayer

message: I have altered the previous reference to Kharn in the novel GiF, as it seemed to more or less describe a fight between the character and Garviel Loken, rather than give any important information on the character of Kharn himself. I've expanded it to a degree that I think is more appropriate, as well as adding proper notes and references to the article.Primarch 01:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Galaxy In Flames

message: I've altered the article to better conform to the WP:WAF, through rewriting the in-universe tone to an out-of-universe one as well as re-structuring. Primarch 10:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed!Primarch 10:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit to Wikipedia style guide

message: I think it may be wise to remove the rules for Kharn from the article. Games Workshop are notoriously strict with their rules being posted online, and wikipedia could be in trouble if GW's IP section finds this. - Norminator 16:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules

message: Hey all. An unknown user insists on reverting this article to mention that Kharn is 'one heck of a guy'. While this is only small and cute, it is obviously vandalism. They've now reverted it to this state on three different occasions (and changed IP addresses on the last). Any advice on where to go from here?Primarch 14:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assistance
Talk:La'Kais

message: Regarding the comment "There is no way to know if O'Kais is Fire Warrior's La'Kais, although O'Kais mentions when Space Marines are present that "They shall pay for what they did to Dolumar!"."
This is incorrect: when Kais encounters a Space Marine force, his actual quote is "Space Marines! They shall pay dearly for Damocles!". This refers to the Damocles Crusade, where Imperial forces (including Space Marines) invaded Tau territory in Warhammer 40,000 lore. Will need to confirm this, so I haven't changed the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.253.11 (talk) 14:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:General Sturnn

message: Hey this guy rules! while he is not as toughest as most of the hero units in DoW it's sure than with three or four priest in the command squad he becomes in the most powerful hero-killer of the game, and when you add the fanatism skill of the priest you can use Sturnn and his squad as a shock-assault team. Definitly this is really necesariy until you acces to regimental options and ogryns, as most of the units of the Imperial Guard are really weak at close combat.
--General Kane Nash 03:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia, but please note that this page is intended for discussing the article, rather than tactics and the like for the game – that sort of thing is probably better discussed on a DoW or 40k forum. If you are interested in helping out Wikipedia, please feel very free to head over to Wikipedia:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000 and join in! Cheers --Pak21 10:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hearne family

message: I can't help thinking that | would help here. Something like:
      |............................................
      |                      |          .         .
  +---+---+               +--+--+       .         .
  |       |               |  |  |       .         .
  T       G               H  W  JT      TA        JW
  |       |
  |    +--+--+--+
  |    |  |  |  |
  GF   A  F  R  GG
  |       |
  |       |
  TJ     GAL
 
Yes/no? -- ALoan (Talk) 15:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gue'vesa

message: This page is not technically correct. According to the player-compiled Tau Lexicon (which sites a GW publication),  Tau A to Z and GW's Gue'la Auxiliary Army, Gue'la is the term applied to humans allied with the Tau. I'm going to mark this page as a stub for now, and if changes haven't been made in a week or so return and take a stab at making more comprehensive article.
RCanine 21:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propse NOT to delete this article, but merge it and the other pages, such as Kroot and Vespid allies into the Tau main article. Nemesis646 (talk) 16:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection 

message: It's important article and it will be even more important to W40K Universe because Tau Empire is colonizing Imperium's worlds.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightvsdarkness (talk • contribs) 18:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection
Talk:Dead man zone

message: I'm suggesting this be merged into Bushfire.  It's stubby on its own with a generic stub tag. --Happynoodleboy 15:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This article has the potential to expand, and the term is not exclusive to bushfires (ie fires in New Zealand, Oz and New Caledonia) -- oppose the merge User:Pedant 16:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose merge 

message: Any thoughts on the way this article is capitalized? Since it's not a proper noun, normally it would be lower case (Dead man zone). I suspect that in the firefighting literature it is often upper case, but I don't think it should be in a general encyclopedia. It's had this capitalization since the article was started in 2005, so I thought I'd check here before changing it. If there is no objection, I'll make the change here and in the template in a week or so. Thanks, SchreiberBike talk 18:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Velfarre

message: Major rewrite complete, added peer review, also added peer review to project Japan page. After peer review, will add the the article to be reviewed, hopefully will loose stub status. Comments? Please leave on the PR page. Thanks for reading -- Nictius 14:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Squig

message: Is there a wiki specifically for warhammer content? Mathiastck 14:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warhammer wiki 

message: I've removed the tag questioning the article's notability, because since then three solid references have been added. Also I am sure squigs are a notable part of Warhammer lore. If you still think the notability is not well estabilished in the article, please advise on how to improve it.--CyHawk (talk) 13:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Targa top

message: This page is really unclear about the difference between a T-top or a targa top, and implies that they're the same thing. T in T-Top doesn't stand for Targa. Others have reverted the T-top page, so maybe it gets its own, or gets on "sunroof" or "removable panel roof" —Camaro96 15:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: None of the photos on this page really show what a Targa top is. 107.211.215.1 (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo quality 

message: Badly mispronounced and spelled derivitive from the German word for "Day" (Tag) or more likely "Day Out" (Tagaus) which would sound very much like "Targa's" or "Tah-Gus" (emphisis on "Tah") to an English speaker. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.31.184.166 (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a folk etymology.  The evidence that the name is connected to the Targa Florio is much stronger.  Shawn D. 12:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of "Targa" 

message: "With the introduction of the Mazda Miata in 1989, saw a revival of convertibles as recent models had roll bar incorporated into the front windscreen, Targas and T-top saw a slow decline as manufacturers discontinued them one by one, putting convertibles into favor, but will continue to produce them when it is not possible to incorporate convertible styles."
Someone please fix this. I'm not exactly sure what this section is trying to say. --Gbleem 06:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What saw? 

message: What is a targa band? --Gbleem 06:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the trim strip that runs up the b-pillar and over the roof. Shawn D. 13:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  targa band? 

message: An expert will have to confirm, but it sounds like this car should now be added to the list.
67.198.96.98 (talk) 20:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016/17 Mazda MX-5
Talk:Edible flower

message: Nuritionally, the flower can be divided into three main elements.
*  First, there is pollen, although in very small quantities, it is a rich source of protein.
*  Secondly is the nectar.  Usually sweet and is the substance that most attracts bees to pollinate them.  Nectar provides a balanced form of sugars with a range of minerals and vitamins.
*  Lastly, the petals of the flower.  Not as nutritious as leaves, they provide us with a good range of vitamins and minerals.
Solarone 15:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment 1

message: In response to another post where it said pollen is a good source of protein, why would the protein have to be removed before consuming the flower? Is it unhealthy or dangerous? (ssage1)
Why is it that edible flowers must be consumed "sensibly" or as I'm reading it, in moderation?
Also, why would you want to remove the pollen before consuming the flower?
--Jwilson4 23:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions?

message: Sorry, but the example/recipe link was not my contribution.  I think that some people are forgetting to use their "signature" on comments and it will be hard for the instructor to know who said what.  Someone come and claim that link so you can get credit in the class for comments given!--Jwilson4 13:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't take credit for the recipe link. 

message: I found some interesting facts to my own questions above.  I wanted to know why some flowers could only be eaten in moderation.  If you follow this link: http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/hil/hil-8513.html, an extension agent from NC State U, has a wonderful table on (all?) the edible flowers and why some of them should only be eaten in moderation.  
On the same site, I also found the answer to the question about removing pollen organs.  The extension agent states that people with allergies or asthma could have some biochemical sensitivity reactions when consuming these flowers.  Makes sense!--Jwilson4 13:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One last blog. 

message: Might I suggest including a few examples of restaurant foods that have flowers in them, or restaurants that use flowers in their dishes, as well as prepared foods at the sore that include them?
--Painter guy 04:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestions 

message: I'm surprised this list doesn't include some of the most common edible flowers, such as broccoli, cauliflower, and artichokes. Surely they belong on this list?--H-ko (Talk) 23:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd think any commonly known edible flower could go on the list. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree that common edible flowers such as broccoli, cauliflower, and artichokes should be on the list.  I have added them as well as a few others not mentioned.--YoDeeKu (talk) 14:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  common flowers?
Talk:Space Hulk: Vengeance of the Blood Angels

message: In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field includes "PC".  I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the  Vgclegend template.  For example, if Space Hulk: Vengeance of the Blood Angels only runs on MS-DOS, then Space Hulk: Vengeance of the Blood Angels's Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.
ProResearcher (talk) 01:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: I want to know how I can download a game Orji liberty (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games
Talk:Italian participation on the Eastern Front

message: Who gives him the right to decide that the broadcasts by Radio Rome and Radio Berlin concerning the role of Axis forces are unreliable and of dubious nature. What has he got the mentality of a child?? Isn't it obvious that historians would've discovered by now that Radio Berlin and Radio Rome had got it all wrong, inventing units that didn't exist and placing them in wrong areas, and ofcourse, getting the dates, timing and weather all wrong when describing actions. Nick Dowling, get real, and have a read of the pages that deal with "Siege Of Tobruk", "Operation Brevity", "Operation Crusader", etcetera, to see that you got it all wrong mate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Generalmesse (talk • contribs) 03:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the links, and just removed them again, in line with WP:EL, WP:RS and WP:NOTLINK. As these are unreliable primary sources they add nothing of value to the article, especially when they're just stuck at the end of the article by themselves. Why are you adding these links if you also regard them as being unreliable sources? By the way, if you abuse any other editor like that you can expect to be blocked - see WP:CIVIL. By the way, I don't see any Italian or German communiques quoted on the Operation Brevity and Operation Crusader articles and the British communique quoted in the Tobruk article is unsatisfactory, but at least is being used in context as it's clearly identified as being from a British government wartime source in the text of the article. Nick Dowling (talk) 05:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop trying to tell us that 1940s broadcasts are good things to add to the article when there are multiple published histories of the events now produced. Buckshot06(prof) 06:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Censoring by Nick Dowling

message: Colonel von Herff, impressed by the actions and bravery of the Bersaglieri defending Halfaya Pass, issued an order of the day stating:
"The detachment which defended the plains of Halfaya Pass resisted with lionlike courage until the last man against stronger enemy forces. The greatest part of them died faithful to the flag."''
But it's clearly propaganda, for it's quoting New York Times/Berlin Radio so using your words when editing, "Propaganda Out", show us what you are made of, and remove this rubbish that has no shred of evidence (like you'd wanna have us believe) to support it; hey man, show us what you are made of.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadioBerlin (talk • contribs) 14:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Noclador Check This Out; From The Operation Brevity Wiki Page

message: So how many Italian troops were serving in Russia before Stalingrad? Drutt (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  "By November 1942, the 8th Italian Army had a total of 235,000 men in twelve divisions and four legions. It was equipped with 988 guns, 420 mortars, 25,000 horses, and 17,000 vehicles." see: Italian_Army_in_Russia#Composition for more details; noclador (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers
Talk:Tina Keeper

message: Best of luck to Tina in politics.  Always loved watching her on North of 60.  That was one of the best shows on TV.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.91.146 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In researching my article on Joe Keeper, Tina's grandfather, I ran across mentions of a modern day Joe Keeper, as being a person who has been interviewed frequently on Cree topics.  I imagine this is the son of her grandfather, but I don't have any proof of that.  Any information as to whether he's Tina's father or uncle?  There's also a ferry, M.V. Joe Keeper, and I wanted to add that to the Joe Keeper article, but there was nothing to prove whom it was named for.  Does anybody have input to that?  Corvus cornixtalk 18:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current day Joe Keeper

message: The article was written as if it was for a fan site, and also included material that honestly looked like it was cut-and-pasted from a promotional brochure. I have cleaned it up as best I can but it probably needs some updating. I deleted a paragraph listing in detail present and upcoming productions by Kistikan Productions because that material read like ad copy and is more appropriate for an article on Kistikan Productions, rather than a biographical article about someone whose notability is based upon other work (in Keeper's case, acting and serving as an MP). The article is also missing some key personal information. For example, was she not married or otherwise involved with her co-star on North of 60? I remember seeing some headlines about that. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 20:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions and removed information
Talk:.us

message: The article notes that .tx.us domains are delegated to the Texas Regional Hostmaster, which requires a mailing address in the same locality as the domain.  However, the TRH apparently shut down in 2018, with registration reverting to Neustar (presumably now GoDaddy).  Does this fairly unusual requirement about the mailing address remain, or did it go away with TRH? Minh Nguyễn 💬 22:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas Regional Hostmaster
Talk:Krusty's Fun House

message: As far as I can recall, there were just four rats in each level of the Gameboy version. Can anyone verify this? BaldAdonis 01:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true. I have been playing it today :-D. Bennity 23:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Rodents

message: I think this article should be about Rat Trap (as it is the original version), with a section about Krusty's Fun House. -- Stormwatch (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Rat Trap? 

message: Aspects of the development are briefly covered in the last question of this interview with one of the developers.
DavidBoddie (talk) 14:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of the NES Version