lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Assessment/Archive 3

message: Before we start classifying songs articles we will (given that we have to consider whether to merge) need to decide on some notability requirements and/or a general policy. I've just had a look at Please Please Me, and that's a nice example of an inclusive album article, where the songs are listed within the article. Get Back (song) is an extremely good example of doing it the other way. --kingboyk 12:11, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why couldn't we do it both ways? I'm in favor of each song having its own article, but why should that stop us from giving quick facts about each song on an album in its own article? It might be worth comparing Let It Be (album) to Let It Be (song). As a side note, why do certain song/album titles redirect to the same name, but with a parthesized type (e.g. Let It Be, Get Back)? —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 03:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual songs vs longer album articles 

message: OK... if we want to start using these, we need one more "importance" template, which is "unknown". I know i've been talking about the perlcode for ever and planning to get back to it, but if we want to use importance (and we can) the code needs to take that on as well. What column should it go in front of or behind or whatever?  ++Lar: t/c 04:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I was just working on this. You gotta let me complete my thoughts. At any rate, it's there. And I think I've finalized the colors, so check it out. I've added a tag for The Beatles as an example, but the rest of the articles need to be analyzed. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 05:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we want it in a seperate cell maybe? (not a rhetorical question). --kingboyk 11:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely as a separate cell I think, as having it in the article link cell makes it overwhelming. Also we may want to change the color of  a bit because it's almost exactly the same hue. Having it differ (but still in that general area because of the meaning) might be good. I suggest somewhat more in the purple direction from magenta, and darker. I'd change it myself but Gordon has been doing great in this area, my color sense is atrocious. ++Lar: t/c 11:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about making it a separate cell (simply by using the pre-existing templates), but then I realized that I'd have to go through each and every listing and add it by hand. I assume that this was an auto-generated listed to begin with, so you can feel free to add a separate cell yourself. As for the color of , I'll take a look at it. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 02:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, this is so much better. Before, the magenta  was sticking out like a sore thumb. The deeppink  blends in with the rest of the colors sooooo much better. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 02:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article importance grading scheme
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Assessment/Archive 4

message: The templates we use for grading have changed slightly - instead of using our own templates, we use those from Wikipedia:Version 1.0 with a few of our own additional templates left over. The big news is that Template:WPBeatles has been updated to display the article classifications. Please see that page for instructions, and Template talk:WPBeatles for an example. Talk pages which use  without a parameter are placed in :Category:Unassessed Beatles articles, those with assessments get placed in a Beatles article category specific to that quality level. This is to allow Mathbot to automatically build tables of our articles for consideration by the Wikipedia 1.0 team - see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index of subjects (will update to include our Project and Wikipedia:WikiProject The KLF later tonight, I'm told).
Please note that if  is used on a non-mainspace article - such as Category talk: or Portal talk: - it should be used with a descriptive word as a parameter, such as . As well as altering the first line displayed by the template it will ensure that we don't get non-mainspace articles (categories, portals etc) listed in :Category:Unassessed Beatles articles.
I've now amended the  for all non-mainspace articles, all articles under letter A in The Beatles category listed overleaf, and all A-class articles. If others would update the tags for the others it would be great. --kingboyk 20:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the process of doing it now, with AWB. --kingboyk 09:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I've updated the template to handle importance too. I'll tag a few articles as proof of concept/to try and establish some standards but I continue to think it's best to hold off on article assessments until we know if the bot will be updated to handle comments and our non-standard gradings. (I'm hopeful that it will, as the bot is getting ever more advanced). Of course my importance gradings shouldn't be taken as gospel and can be changed!! --kingboyk 15:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to grading and templates 

message: I've moved the old system out to Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Article Classification/Archive 1, and got this page about 75% ready for the new system. Once a few issues are ironed out (see Template talk:WPBeatles) we can update the instructions and reopen this department! :) The new system should if anything be easier, and we can give it a good plugging in the next newsletter. --kingboyk 11:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back soon
Talk:Music history of the United States

message: It is unclear why this article should be separate from Music of the United States.  If there is no rationale for this, I propose that we merge them. I think that would improve both pages, especially this one. DougHill (talk) 03:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Music of the United States 

message: The second paragraph of "African American music" begins: "Spirituals (or Negro spirituals, as they were then known) were Christian songs, dominated by passionate and earthy vocals are similar to the church music of Scotland, which were performed in an African-style and Scottish style call-and-response format using hymns derived from those sung in colonial New England choirs, which were based on Moravian, English and Dutch church music."
I don't know enough of the subject matter to do it myself. I suspect that the first "are" should be removed -- but after that . . . I think we need to make it into two or even three separate sentences.
gpeterw (talk) 12:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone re-organize this passage?
Talk:Da Hong Pao

message: Da Hong Pao ABSOLUTELY is an oolong tea. Oolong teas are partially oxidized (10% - 80% +/-) It is NOT fermented - it is oxidized (and black teas, or "red teas" in Chinese (Hong Cha) are not fully oxidized either but they are highly oxidized and the manufacturing is done in a manner to encourage this. Oolongs are oxidized by bruising the edges of the tea leaves. They also may be (and Da Hong Pao is) highly roasted (traditionally over charcoal) or not (as with modern styled Tie Guanyin.) As to the name, if one understands the name in the context of history, the best rendition likely is "Scarlet Robe." "Big Red Robe" is a modern rendition of the characters that does not account for historical context and usage.
99.60.150.101 (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oolong

message: According to this article and this historical exchange rate tool, 20g of the original leaves were sold for nearly $22000 2002-US dollars, putting the price at over $1M per kilogram.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimworm (talk • contribs) 09:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price of this tea 

message: I believe the more commonly used English name for Da Hong Pao is "Red Cloak Tea" whereas "Large Red Robe" is simply a direct translation from Mandarin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.223.195 (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Name for this tea 

message: Some online tea shops have marketed Da Hong Pao as an oolong--it is unclear whether their varieties are not fully fermented as traditional Da Hong Pao tea is or they have errors on their sites.[3]
As far as I know, da hong pao IS an oolong. The source cited is a store marketing it as an oolong. Does anyone claim otherwise? (Note that just because the name contains "hong" does not mean it's hongcha.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.140.244 (talk) 02:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oolong 

message: Does anyone know if this story is true?
"When President Nixon visited China in 1972, he was given 50g as a gift. His anger brewing, it was explained to him that this was half of China’s reserves at the time and was worth, in today’s money, about $250,000."
http://en.foodie.fm/blog/2011/9/8/5-foods-you-should-try-if-you-win-the-lottery.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.191.6.32 (talk) 23:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gift to Nixon 

message: As it stands, the article says there were four original bushes and six of them still exist, which is obviously nonsensical. Needs editing. Liuzhou (talk) 06:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies 

message: This article is too brief and needs more details. One of the sources in the citation is from a website, which is not a reliable source. It needs more reliable sources to rich its content. LinearBicycle (talk) 03:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Enterprise, Florida

message: This article was lifted from my original article on Enterprise history at OldEnterprise.org.  When the person took my info, he also inserted some errors in my sentences which make them inaccurate because he had no knowledge of Florida history or of how to revise an article someone else wrote.  He did insert a couple of his own paragraphs, but they are poorly written and misleading in terms of historical context.
I would like to submit my original article with sources listed as a replacement for this travesty of a piece that is currently online.
How do I do this?
Lani Friend
Enterprise Public Historian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.170.33.216 (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. If you wish to donate text that you've previously published elsewhere, the procedure is set out at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you feel that this article is an infringement on your own, please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations. My apologies for the lengthy delay in response. Unfortunately, communications on article talk pages that are not routinely watched may go unnoticed for quite some time! If you have questions about either of these processes, please feel free to drop by my talk page. Alternatively, there is a Wikipedia:Help desk which you might find useful. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Wuyi Mountains

message: .......hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.70.121 (talk) 00:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

message: If the "The mountains cover an area of 60 km²" how come that "The world heritage site has an area of 999.75 square kilometres within an additional buffer zone of 278.88 km²"? I admit that those numbers were taken from UNESCO site, but this does make sense, especially after reading in the only reference in the article (Britannica Educational Publishing (2010). The Geography of China: Sacred and Historic Places) the following sentence: "A protected area of about 38 square miles (100 square km) was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1999." Could it be that all the UNESCO site numbers should be divided be 10? Avihu (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   World heritage site area size 

message: Searching for the term "Cathayshan fold system" in the geology section of the article I came across a similar term, but with slightly different spelling: Cathaysian. See for example in Glossary of history, but more importantly in Uranium Deposits of the World: Asia or Structural development of the Lower Paleozoic belt of South China: Genesis of an intracontinental orogen. Avihu (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cathayshan or  Cathaysian?
Talk:Jiangxi

message: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-candidates-promise-a-crackdown-chinas-advantage-erodes-in-a-key-area/2012/10/26/2363a766-1a18-11e2-bd10-5ff056538b7c_story.html?hpid=z2
i'd note that Jiangxi is noted for rare earth mining.....
--Patbahn (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  rare earth mining 

message: Are the Hakka People of Jiangxi natives of Jiangxi, or were their ancestors later (relative to the Gan Peoples) migrants into Jiangxi. I am under the impression that the Hakka language and Gan languages are closely related, which then would suggest that the two peoples are also closely related. 2A00:23C5:C10B:A300:A40C:90C:8478:F5F0 (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hakka People in Jiangxi
Talk:Cassadaga, Florida

message: Do not delete the WikiProject Florida tag on this page. (That action may be considered vandalism!) Gamweb (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: by the way, thanks for changing the location. I didnt think that was right either [orlando??] Cassadaga is closer to deltona than orlando. Great! :) Venus Satanas (talk) 07:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Florida

message: This commentary that I deleted here had nothing to do with the article at hand, nor was it a discussion of the article's contents. i would consider this comment that i erased to be vandalism [and a cheap shot]. Feel free to read the history of this talk page if you doubt my concerns.
:Aside from that, I added new information to this article and hopefully expanded it in a way that everyone can appreciate. I also removed the Stub tag, as this article has been expanded to include more information and references. Venus Satanas (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted earlier discussion left by anonymous editor
Talk:Ponce Inlet, Florida

message: I wanted to add information on Ponce Inlet's wild life, history, and talk about things to do. Delsurfing (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to give sources for information you add to Wikipedia. Without reliable sources your edits are original research, which isn't allowed in WP articles. You need to read the articles linked in the welcome message you got on your talk page. Don't hesitate to ask for help per the instructions you got from the editor who welcomed you. Carlstak (talk) 03:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  editing the article
Talk:Ormond Beach, Florida

message: Ormond Beach voters have recently approved a 75 foot building height restriction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.217.105.83 (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think we should merge the two history sections. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 16:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as long as there's a link to it.140.146.225.254 (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging the two history sections
Talk:Marinka (operetta)

message: Should this be designated an operetta or musical? The NYT articles both refer to it as a musical.4meter4 (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen or heard it.  But it is Kalman, and from the description in Time, it seems to be an "operetta" style piece.  Although the NY Times "calls" it a musical, I believe that they did not make this distinction in describing operetta-style pieces. I'd call it an "operetta", and write it up using the opera project guidelines and cats, unless it is clearly not.  I can only see the abstract for the NY Times articles.  How do they "describe" the score?  Do they use words like "romantic" and "sweeping"?  Those were operetta words.  Cole Porter, on the other hand, was described as "fresh", "light", "snappy", etc.  BTW, it doesn't matter that much.  I think that clearly The Vagabond King and The Desert Song were operettas, but we treat them as musicals because a former member of the opera project insisted on it.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operetta or musical? 
Talk:Dr. Phillips, Florida

message: I can't find any reference to "The Dewan S. Alam High School" online. Is it made up?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.90.45.60 (talk) 17:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dewan S. Alam High School 

message: Apparently, the preferred spelling is "Doctor Phillips" rather than "Dr. Phillips" -- not that I would ever split hairs over such a thing. Mark D Hardy (talk) 01:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Phillips 
Talk:Charles Neaves, Lord Neaves

message: The quote in the Quotations section on woman's rights is very misleading (and whoever added it seems to have misunderstood it) "—O why should a Woman not get a Degree?" is not the last line of the poem, but the title. The first three verses set up an argument for women's degrees, but the last one, the one cited, then repudiates it and gives a "reason" why they are not needed (Angels don't need degrees...) So far from heretical and enlightened, it is the opposite
The full poem is here:
https://dvpp.uvic.ca/poems/blackwoods/1869/pom_10456_o_why_should_a_woman_not_get_a.html
I'm not sure how best to address this though, without the danger of "original research"? (though one could argue that is also the case now, with the interpretation not supported by sources)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.41.114.227 (talk) 10:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  woman's rights
Talk:Dhirendranath Datta

message: There was a link to this topic from an article elsewhere - the subject (a Bangladeshi hero) is an extremely important one - and we need a few days to put together the necessary information with research and citations—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shomajtontro (talk • contribs) 04:45, 5 July 2006  (UTC)
:Sure, but next time please create the main part of the article first. Links only article are usually not accepted in Wikipedia.  --WinHunter (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lis Harris

message: To me it seems a big stretch to say that in 25 years the most notable piece that Harris ever wrote for the New Yorker was an article about SY.   That seems to me to be a very pov statement and nearly impossible to verify.  What criteria was used in arriving at that conclusion?  TheRingess 04:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of statement about article 
Talk:Diminished triad

message: How is each kind of diminished chord notated? --Jlloganiii 04:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation

message: I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 20:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: The article is perfect. But I was thinking about some works that employ remarkable diminished triad chord. Beethoven's String Quartet No. 9 in C major Op. 59 No. 3 "Razumovsky" starts with such a chord. The last movement of the "Appassionata" Sonata also comes from a transition on this chord. Of course, there must be inumerable examples, but there are some importante moments with this chord. --Leonardo T. de Oliveira (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Works

message: This article says Cmb5 is how to notate a diminished triad. What does the b stand for?? Georgia guy (talk) 12:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: C minor chord with a flat fifth ie C diminished  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.126.86 (talk) 21:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

text: In other words the "b" means "flat."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.203.130.208 (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

text: See Template:Music. Hyacinth (talk) 00:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cmb5 

message: The enharmonic notes, while nice for ease of reading, contradict the definition of triad. Triads are three-note chords built by stacking thirds. By definition, a Db diminished triad would be Db, Fb, Abb no matter how clumsy the double flats look. On the other hand, Db, E, G is not a Db diminished triad. (If anything, that would imply more a E diminished seventh missing the fifth). I suggest we remove the enharmonic spellings for this reason. Composers also would not have done this for the reasons listed.
If there is no response in a few days, I'll remove them myself. — Devin.chaloux (chat) 03:50, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table - Enharmonic Notes 

message: Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music#Consistent diminished chord typography if interested. Thanks! -- Beland (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for consistent diminished chord typography
Talk:Tobias (Animorphs)

message: Could someone add the book number next to which the particular morph is found? I'm sure there must be some Animorph lovers around here...<P>
:Working on it.  ;) Ensign beedrill (talk) 13:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of morphs 

message: When did Tobias acquire a Rachel morph? I couldn't find any sort of information about that at all, neither online nor in the Anibase, which is from Scholastic. Artemis Wolfang (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It could possibly be vandalism.  I noticed that a bit around Wikipedia . . . 152.31.229.30 (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rachel Morph?
Talk:Photon-induced electric field poling

message: I've manually backed out most of this edit by Holoman (talk • contribs). Line by line commentary is as follows:
* created and patented by Michael E. Thomas in 1998 -- None of the references support this. It seems to be a phenomenon studied by many researchers around the world, as a part of the study of ferroelectric effects and of nonlinear optics.
* resonant absorption band frequency -- "Resonant" and "frequency" are redundant. Readers either know what an absorption band is, or can click the link.
* space charge fields -- Space charge refers to electric field effects in vacuum. I doublechecked this to make sure it didn't also refer to fields in dielectric materials (which I thought I'd seen occasional references to). Either way, it certainly doesn't apply to the ferroelectric domains this technique applies to.
* holographics or electric fields spintronics -- Spintronics is a completely unrelated phenomenon. None of the references mention using ferroelectric materials in a spintronic system, and any such setup would be completely different from the one discussed in this article.
I've made other substantial tweaks to the article text for clarity and to match the statements made in the reference papers.
I've also looked through all of the references, cleaned up citation style, organized them into appropriate sections, and removed the one or two that weren't relevant to the article. The version of the article I've just produced is accurate, as far as I can tell from the references. --Christopher Thomas 04:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of recent edits by [[User:Holoman]]
Talk:Wangaratta

message: I suppose here is a good a place as any to restart the conversation off. Here is my previous conversation about this website, though. O.K., I have no idea what "rms" stands for. Is it actually a justification for removing the link? Can anyone clarify?GSTQ 03:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Travel Victoria photo site

message: The industry section needs a rewrite.  E.g. a discussion of Bruck, Yakka, Woollen Mills, etc.Weedwhacker128 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industry 