lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Old Town San Diego State Historic Park

message: "Old Town" is San Diego is used to describe both the state historic park and the surrounding neighborhood, but this article focuses on the State Historic Park. Personally, I'd like to move this article to "Old Town, San Diego, California" and change the focus to the neighborhood while retaining all the Historic Park information as a section within the article. Alternatively, I could just add the neighborhood categories to this article and leave it as is. Any other thoughts? Orayzio 19:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both of these articles exist (the present article and Old Town, San Diego, California), and someone should disentagle them. Neither Whaley House nor Temple Beth Israel is in the Old Town San Diego State Historic Park, but both are currently mentioned here as if they were. - Jmabel | Talk 00:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Town neighborhood? 

message: It seems a minor point, but it is not correct to say that Bazaar Del Mundo was "the" major concessionaire. http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=28022 Here is a list of concessionaires in the state park - out of 43 concessions, 21 are owned by Fiesta de Reyes (formerly Bazaar Del Mundo). Certainly a major concessionaire, but by no means "the" major concessionaire. During her dispute with the state, Diane Powers spread a lot of deliberately misleading information in the local that was popularly interpreted as "Old Town was being closed down" and that the "state park was being sold to an out of state corporation". This severely impacted the other concessionaires; there were talk of boycotts, etc. These effects are still being felt, and the equivocation of "Old Town State Historic Park" with that single concession is part of the problem.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.229.122.177 (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input. The cited reference  describes the Powers-Delaware North group of establishments as "the largest concession" in the park; does that sound like a fair way to put it? --MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bazaar Del Mundo "a" major concessionaire 

message: Hi 72.192.163.170 (talk) 05:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:Semperoper

message: Semperoper is the usual German, Semper Oper is just wrong. Redirect should be the other way round.
*Support I brought it up so I evidently support it. Weasel 23:28, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Although Semper Oper is definitely not the correct title to use and Semperoper is acceptable, I think Semper Opera House is the ideal title for the English Wikipedia. Olessi 07:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: When listing operas that have premiered here, should the list only be operas that received their world premiere at the Semperoper?  The European premiere of Dead Man Walking was performed here in May of this year, but I haven't added it to the list here because I didn't know if it should be included or not.  There have also been other world premieres since it was rebuilt in 1985, but I need to read through their site and check up on that some more.  Tnmusikherr 18:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question on Premieres

message: This building should be listed under a new category for replica buildings. See Talk:St Mark's Campanile Robert Schediwy (Vienna)  84.112.54.160 (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replica Building

message: This gives the impression that what happened after the 1869 fire was a mere reconstruction. In fact, the first Senperoper looked very different from what can be seen now, see the pics here. Yaan (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First built in 1841
Talk:Schuttern Gospels

message: To me, the 'Further reading' section implies that none of these sources was used for the article. If so, what sources were consulted? If not, I would suggest to rename the section to 'References' or 'Sources' in line with WP:CITE. — mark ✎ 18:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The works listed under further reading were not consulted.  The only source for the article is the the British Library catalog entry. (The list under further reading is their bibliography) Dsmdgold 03:32, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading? 

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. -- The Bethling(Talk) 22:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: This article is currently at Good Article Review. Teemu08 20:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review 

message: This article has been delisted from a Good Article review. In a 4 to 1 vote to delist, the primary concern is one which I guess the editors of this page probably know by now since some of you commented on the review, namely, the single reference thing. I didn't vote on this article, but I think you'd have a better case defending the usage of only a single catalog entry if you could cite some precedents, policies, guidelines, or the like which justify the usage of single catalog entries to reference entire articles of this variety. Review archived here: Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 16 . Homestarmy 23:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA/R result
Talk:The Live: 1993-2002

message: I don't understand: I deleted this page and redirected it to Live Box, but this page still appears. I'm clearly doing something wrong. Damiancorrigan 23:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's ok, it redirects now. Sweetie Petie 23:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:LaTeX Project Public License

message: Errr...if the LPPL can be copied and distributed, as long as it isn't modified, why isn't it placed here? I'm sure I'm missing something. -203.167.247.190 23:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Once it's placed here, it becomes licensed under the GFDL. But since GFDL is incompatible with the license under which LPPL is available, this would be illegal. --logixoul 17:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:St. Andrew's College, Sydney

message: This whole article is lifted word-for-word from the St Andrew's website, , but should it just be deleted?
:I second the anonimous comment. I'll tag it.Blarneytherinosaur 03:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyrighted material has been long removed from the article. 02:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have moved this edit here for discussion:
:"Unfortunately St Andrew's sporting reputation has been all but destroyed in recent years, gaining the new reputation as the 'choke' college of Sydney University. Notable 'chokes' against Wesley College include: 2007- rowing, rugby, soccer, all-round Rawson campaign; 2008- rugby, soccer, basketball, athletics, all-round Rawson campaign. Congratulations on having attractive females; less congratulations on consistently snatching defeat from the jaws of victory."
This is, as presently written, completely unacceptable for an encyclopedia. Perhaps something about the College's sporting record could be added to the article, but it needs to be rewritten. --Bduke  (Discussion) 22:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today section & sport
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Stevertigo/text

message: ====Involved parties====
Party 1: Initiator
*Carbonite
Party 2: Subject of Arbitration
*Stevertigo
Other Involved Admins
*Geni
*Mackensen
*Thryduulf
; Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
*Stevertigo
*Carbonite | Talk 13:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Stevertigo/Statement
==== Statements by other involved administrators ====
*Thryduulf
*:The statement I made on the arbitration request entitled User:CJK, User:Stevertigo  is relevant also to this request. I am happy to be considered a party to this request if the arbcom or any of the other parties wish it. Feel free to reproduce my statement there on this case if desired (like most of my edits, it is in the public domain). 
*:I am not certain why these requests are separate, and suggest merging them. Thryduulf 18:54, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Stevertigo|Stevertigo]] 

message: Party 1: Initiator
*Carbonite
Party 2: Subject of Arbitration
*Stevertigo
Other Involved Admins
*Geni
*Mackensen
*Thryduulf
; Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
*Stevertigo
*Carbonite | Talk 13:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Involved parties

message: *Thryduulf
*:The statement I made on the arbitration request entitled User:CJK, User:Stevertigo  is relevant also to this request. I am happy to be considered a party to this request if the arbcom or any of the other parties wish it. Feel free to reproduce my statement there on this case if desired (like most of my edits, it is in the public domain). 
*:I am not certain why these requests are separate, and suggest merging them. Thryduulf 18:54, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statements by other involved administrators 

message: * Accept Fred Bauder 13:30, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
* Accept. Jayjg (talk) 20:57, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (5/0/0/0)
Talk:List of television evangelists

message: I think that Malcolm Boyd should be removed from this page.  By it's very definition, shouldn't someone have to be on television to be a televangelist?
Oh come on Hao2lian,  was funny, and probably mostly true.
--12.226.168.30 23:49, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Malcolm Boyd

message: List of United States televangelists → List of American televangelists — mostly naming standards and precedent —Bulldog123 14:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I've removed all redlinks and plain black entries. Generally, if there is no Wikipedia article on these people, they fail notability. If anyone wishes to re-add entries, please either link to an existing Wiki article on the person or provide a reference that establishes their notability based on a reliable source. Regards! Franamax (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I've been serving for days to find this preacher who has his own television show. He looks like a body builder , has tattoos, and is loud. He's funny at times but always gets his point across. I need his name so I can watch more of him. I just experienced a huge loss and I am alone now. If anyone can help PLEASE PLEASE LET ME KNOW. Thanks and God bless.  Lisamarie1969 (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tv preachers HELP!!!!!!!!!!
Talk:Kiki Musampa

message: I think we should add his nickname at Man City. Chris, as in Christmas Hamper..
;-)
--Nzd 23:50, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname
Talk:Alcubierre drive/Archive 1

message: Hi, 63.201.230.31 from SBC, the statement you added is meaningless as stated, and the page you cited certainly doesn't imply anything about time travel in the sense of closed timelike curves.  In fact, the ADM form of the metric guarantees that Alcubierre style warp drive spacetimes do not admit any closed timelike curves, if that is what you had in mind.  Hint: construct a simplified two-dimensional warp drive using a compact bump function with metric in ADM form as in the Alcubierre spacetimes.  Draw some light cones.  Study the nature of the timelike geodesics.  You will see that in fact the ADM form guarantees that they cannot turn around in time.  ---CH  (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Time travel?  Not neccessarily
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/VH1 All Time Album Top 100

message: I don't think it's necessary to delete the VH1 Top 100 Albums page. VH1 is not the authority, that, say, Rolling Stone magazine is, but they are a recognized contributor to the pop culture debates in this country, so theirs should be one of the "best albums" lists you feature on Wikipedia. As long as you can monitor vandals who like to have "dumb fun". (Emphasis on "dumb".) There are many such lists of best-this and best-that on television, on the web, in journals, newspapers and magazines, so perhaps it would be appropriate to house them under an entry which analyzes the 'popular hierarchy' phenomenon in this country. There are many reasons why we make these kinds of lists, and those reasons are integral to our level of luxury and comfort, which affords us the chance for self-reflection. (You're not, for example, going to find a "Top 100 Warlords" list in an Afganistan newspaper.) VH1's list is a cultural marker, and should thus be recognized.
: Hi! I think you need to put this on the actual AfD page and start the first line with Keep or Strong Keep (Rather than here on the discussion page.) And Make sure to sign your vote with four tildes like this: ˜˜˜˜ Thanks for voting! Danlovejoy 03:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Campbell Slemp

message: I've cleaned this up (and removed some unsourced and seemingly defamatory material about his Confederate service). However, I am far across the state (and have personal business I need to attend to), so errors may remain. I hope someone from southwest Virginia can finish the task, as well as his son's article. Jweaver28 (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed
Talk:London Olympics

message: The date of the Olympics was listed as July 27-August 12 2008. I went ahead and changed it to 2012.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.43.57 (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: The current article name is London Olympics.  I'm considering changing it to one of the following:
*British Olympics
*Olympic Games hosted by the United Kingdom
*Olympic Games in the United Kingdom
The first is a slight change and could incorporate details about the failed Manchester and Birmingham bids.  The second could be more in line with other possible articles (Olympic Games hosted by France, for example).  The last could incorporate details about British competitors and public reactions to the Games along with the content of the other two suggestions.  All of these would detract from this article being details of the London games, but would allow for a wider content.  Any input would be good.  violet/riga (t) 00:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Olympic Games hosted by the United Kingdom would be the best. London/British Olympics makes it sound like an entirely different set of Olympics. ShadowMan1od 05:20, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

text: The way that a country reacts to the Olympic Games could be quite interesting.  Do the British people like the Olympics or don't care about it at all?  How has public reaction changed since we won the bid?  I think the final suggestion has some great potential, not duplicating the individual Olympic articles any more than this one and including a wealth of other information.  It could also link up to the British Olympic performance articles.  violet/riga (t) 14:59, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: It should simply be a WP:Disambiguation page. jnestorius(talk) 19:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The information is better placed elsewhere, e.g. United Kingdom at the Olympics. John Vandenberg (chat) 03:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree. If I knew how to nominate it for deletion, I would!! Cantab12 (talk) 08:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a pointless article 
Talk:High on You (Sly Stone album)

message: This album is not a Sly and the Family Stone Album, either by name or with participation by members. It is credited to Sly Stone, and is indeed a solo album. Sly's albums after this ones, which were indeed solo productions, may have been credited to Sly and the Family Stone, but their merit as band albums can be discussed on the pages for those albums. This doesn't change the fact that this album has never be a Family Stone album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.91.36 (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:The Falconer (Saturday Night Live)

message: I dispute the claim that Falconer sketches are "popular" and as such have removed the description from the article.  I personally can't stand them, but that aside I don't know of any reliable way to measure the popularity of a particular recurring sketch. Jim Smith 00:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll put in my vote that I enjoyed the sketch.  It's my most favorite recent recurring character.  That aside, we can deduce that it was certainly Will Forte's most popular character, appearing 7 times.  That said, seven times doesn't necessarily make it popular by everybody's standards. Leadpipevigilante 00:24, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Meet the Temptations

message: VxnDFh, hf, fh, fh 24.35.154.6 (talk) 23:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 🦜
Talk:Love Child (The Supremes album)

message: "Love Child" is the "only" mature and serious album by The Supremes. It is a relative, minor masterpiece of Motown and Ross' endeavor.  There is not a bad song on the album and there doesn't seem to be any alternative or extended tracks available?  Perhaps, why "Love Child" never had an "Expanded Second Disc" or even any additional tracts - particular - to the original recording sessions. Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Only Mature - Serious Album By The Supremes
Talk:Where Did Our Love Go (album)

message: I made some corrections concerning the "Where Did Our Love Go?" album.  This album did not sell anywhere near 4 million copies in the United States...regardless of time. 
It sold, 1,000,000 in 1964-1965, and sold until 1988, 3,225,000 copies World-wide.  It s their third best selling album behind "The Supremes A Go Go," and their biggest selling album, "Diana Ross And The Supremes Greatest Hits."
Please, be accurate when posting facts and keep the fan routine out of this.
::I have removed album sales figures as no one has provided a reliable source for accurate sales data for Supremes albums. As Motown did not submit their sales data to industry organisations like the RIAA, there aren't certifications we can go by either. They are however published sources for their million-selling singles. JonathanLGardner (talk) 02:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The sales figures for "Where Did Our Love Go?" are as accurate as possible since Motown did not keep accurate tallies of whatever they sold.  The 3,225,000 sales are from Soundscan through 1988.  They are accurate as can be reasonably expected. Motown was a "C" corporation which is privately owned; hence, it was not committed to RIAA sales justification authorization. It is all with the "Public Domain" if one investigates. Spenser - The Unknown (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Talk:The Supremes A' Go-Go

message: Should it be The Supremes À Go-Go with an À? That's the correct French way, and a capital À is often written in French as looking like A'. Sheila1988 (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The Andantes did not actually sing on “Put Yoruself in My Place”, because the article on the song itself states that Mary and Florence sings background to Diana’s lead. I read that Marlene Barrow sang backup alongside Mary on “You Can’t Hurry Love” and when I listened to “Come and Get These Memories”, it is apparent that Florence and Diana are on backing vocals to Mary on lead. If someone could change or amend the information, that’ll be good.
123.243.195.220 (talk) 02:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andantes involvement
Talk:Fraser Canyon Gold Rush

message: I've begun the process of expanding this article, although it is not yet completed.  I wanted to comment on a certain bit I've extracted:
and European settlers outnumbering the indigenous First Nations peoples on the west coast of Canada
This is incorrect and has been removed; the non-native settlers did not outnumber the natives in British Columbia until after the building of the CPR, and even then not until after 1900; even in the Fraser Canyon the indigeneous Sto:lo and Nlaka'pamux and St'at'imc were not outnumbered despite the tens of thousands of newcomers; native numbers in this region were not reduced until after the great smallpox epidemic of 1862, which was a few years later.  Also, the phrasing of the last bit is a common fallacy when writing of events in British Columbia prior to 1871, i.e. when it was not part of Canada; it was simply easier to delete this phrase than to substitute "on the British Columbia Coast"; and the population statement was incorrect in any case.
Skookum1 01:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Could I suggest a map? The government should have one.murp Even a modern one would be nice.
--meatclerk 04:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My scanner's broken or I'd have one of the period maps here already (all public domain by now).Skookum1 07:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: How much was taken out, in oz gold & dollars?  Trekphiler (talk) 21:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  this article's only half-written despite its length...when I find out I'll be back.  With reported gold figures, plus estimates of how much more went unreported...if you're just interested on a personal basis try and find the Hauka book.  Think it's in there (I'm far away from my library right now).Skookum1 (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fistful of [[peso|loonies]]
Talk:Jabir ibn Abd Allah

message: ----
It was "Jabir ibn Abdillah" that was the Umar-Mut'ah-guy, but i suppose they meant this guy. --Striver 01:32, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I think this article is Shia POV, so i'll perform a rewrite. Hamid-Masri 14:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bro, you didn't rewrite, you just removed everything you didn't like. Please restore the info and add the qualifiers that you feel are missing, you know, like "Shi'a  sources state..." and such. Peace. --Striver - talk 04:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I am changing the title to Jabir ibn Abdullah because that is the correct spelling and is the most commonly used name in English sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabranos (talk • contribs) 01:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the title 

message: ￼I am changing the name to Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr ibn Ḥarām al-Anṣārī person as it is his full name and is hard to find otherwise XUnknown Entity (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the title