lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:R. D. Blackmore

message: I would like to say what a very good article this is on a great but rather understated writer. Well done whoever did the research on it! Ivankinsman 13:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of article 

message: Exmoor is wholely in the county of Somerset and not Devon. Since Blackmore's time tourism to this part of England has been centred on places in Devon to the west of Exmoor, and thus the whole tourist area is now called Exmoor National Park whereas the true Forest of Exmoor had no towns or villages and was in Somerset.Porlock of course is in Somerset.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter rawlins (talk • contribs) 18:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   exmoor 
Talk:Steve Owen (American football)

message: There are two entries for this person.  This page (Steve Owen (American football)), and another called Steven Joseph Owen.  This one is clearly more robust, but the two should be merged.  Also, a disambiguation page for Steve Owen would be helpful.  A lot of the wiki links for the football coach point to the East Enders character instead. Anson2995 14:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Pages

message: Here's a link to an autograph from a Phillips University 1921 yearbook that shows he spelled his name Stephen  Revmoran (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Joseph Owen 

message: I think someone with enough time on their hands should put in a chart for Steve Owen's head coaching record just like the ones other coaches have on their Wikipedia pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WakandaForever188 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head Coaching Record
Talk:Steven Joseph Owen

message: There are two entries for this person.  This page (Steven Joseph Owen), and another called Steve Owen (American football).  The other one is clearly more robust, but the two should be merged.  Also, a disambiguation page for Steve Owen would be helpful.  A lot of the wiki links for the football coach point to the East Enders character instead. Anson2995 14:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Pages
Talk:Yonasan Steif

message: IP address 24.184.200.170 recently added the previously unknown year of birth of Rabbi Steif as 1877. I'd like to know the source for this. Many thanks, Nesher 14:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1877

message: The birth and death dates are reversed for some reason. (Or is that a Hebrew right-to-left thing? ;-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.247.0.64 (talk) 01:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Grand Valley State Lakers football

message: This needs some serious code-sorting and I listed it for clean-up--Tiresais 14:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up drastically needed

message: I think this article could be cleaned up somewhat by moving a lot of the information about the stadium to the article Lubbers Stadium.  Information like when attendance records were broken and what improvements took place could be moved.  This article, Grand Valley Football, should be just about the football team and simply mention the stadium. Kuba425 20:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move stadium information
Template talk:Volusia County, Florida

message: I just added Valdez and Kalamazoo to the unincorporated communities section of this template, after seeing that someone added Benson Junction. Each of these three communities is actually a populated place according to GNIS. Also each is a historic populated place that has been absorbed into other cities (DeBary and Deltona in these cases).
If this is how this template is intended to be used, then I would suggest adding all of the other unincorporated areas listed in the Volusia County article. Does anyone disagree, or this stretching the definition of unincorporated community? MrX 22:09, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's correct, except for one basic thing — localities within municipal limits aren't unincorporated, so they don't belong on this type of template.  Nyttend (talk) 23:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Template talk:Sumter County, Florida

message: This template is defective. On every article it's attached to, the unincorporated community of Tarrytown, Florida shows up, But on the Sumterville, Florida article Tarrytown won't show up on the template. I thought it was an unintended consequence of one of User:Nyttend's edits, but I was wrong. So why won't Tarrytown show up there? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  17:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, it's there when I view the page.  Perhaps some sort of weird caching error?  I've edited both article and template, so the caching should now be forced to restart.  Nyttend (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. I'm afraid it's still not showing up. It's definitely weird though, because it shows up on every other Sumter County, Florida article. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  21:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defective template 

message: I removed the towns of Orange Home and Wahoo as they did not have articles.  If I have done anything wrong, please let me know. SciGal (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: I was looking online for Bay View in Sumter County, and I discovered that there was no such community in Sumter County.  Instead, there is (or was) a town named Bay Hill in the county.  In addition, I added the community of Royal.  Somehow, it was forgotten when the template was created. 17:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bay View and Royal
Template talk:Sarasota County, Florida

message: The town of Longboat Key is in two counties, Manatee and Sarasota, and is probably the only municipality in the state to cross a county line. It is common practice to add (part) to an entity on a county template when the entity is only partially within the county. clariosophic 14:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Longboat Key
Talk:Renegade Legion

message: Links and sources?
Added categories, and restored some information that got dropped from earlier editions, once I discovered the history tab. (Okay, finally getting the swing of this wiki thing)  Jape77 18:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The intro talks about four RL-linked board games, but the article then goes on to list five.  I'll change the intro to match.  Rojomoke (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Board Games
Talk:John Cooper (American football)

message: The redirect Coach Cooper has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach Cooper]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kaiyodo

message: Posted this over at Revoltech but seen as both articles are stubs, would it be worth merging the two? 
12:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, I'd point out that many other toylines have full lists, for instance the Super Robot Chogokin article. If such lists are not appropriate, then they need to be removed from all lines. The present treatment of Revoltech on Wikipedia seems more like a grudge against that toyline than a comprehensive Wiki policy. Optimus Sledge (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Suggestion
Talk:GUADEC

message: Why is this in :Category:Linux conferences? GNOME is not Linux. The Wednesday Island 14:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Linux conferences generally cover a wider range than those just targeting the GNU/Linux kernel. In this case, GNOME is amongst the most widely used desktop environments on Linux systems and thus it makes sense for me to be in this category.  一 Salt ♨️🚲🧂🧙‍♂️🐧🎓⚔️☠️ (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

message: Pretty sure I've adequately addressed the question about "Date formats are non-standard" but would appreciate another to verify and remove the cleanup template.  一 Salt ♨️🚲🧂🧙‍♂️🐧🎓⚔️☠️ (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of cleanup required template?
Talk:Zombie (Marvel Comics)

message: Talk a look at the poster for Virgin Among the Living Dead. Then Tales of the Zombie#7.
Virgin/Among Living Dead airbrused from Tales of the Zombie#7 
http://www.comics.org/coverview.lasso?id=27765&zoom=4 Look at the two covers. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?
Posted - Sun Jul 9, 2006 12:49 pm John McDonagh
docsavage80 
Send IM 
Send Email 
Simon Garth zombie in A Virgin Among the Living Dead 
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00008974O.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V1056774594_.jpg Look at the cover! Who could it be with that Damballah amulet? Simon Garth. 
Enda80 21:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swipery 

message: We'll probably want to add some more details about this once it sees publication, as it appears to be a different take on Simon Garth... Mrph 19:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zombie - The Marvel Max version 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  15:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Template talk:Manatee County, Florida

message: The town of Longboat Key is in two counties, Manatee and Sarasota, and is probably the only municipality in the state to cross a county line. It is common practice to add (part) to an entity on a county template when the entity is only partially within the county. clariosophic 14:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen such usage elsewhere.  Nyttend (talk) 14:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Longboat Key
Talk:Growing Man

message: Didn't Hercules fight the Growing Man in Kang's Limbo castle? I remember reading some Avengers issue in the high two hundreds and thinking that Hercules better be careful not to bring the castle down on the heads of his friends. I think the guy was defeated by 'damaging his growing circuitry'. Lols. Lots42 05:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucky punch 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Loyd Blankenship

message: I was surprised to see that his website's front page is all about woodworking. I find it even more surprising that some of the pages on that site list FrontPage as the creator (e.g. http://www.blankenship.com/spice.htm ), and end with a whole bunch of   blocks. Are we sure that's the same Lloyd Blankenship? --Slashme (talk) 21:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Woodworking

message: The timeline is a problem for me, even in this short article. The article page for Hacker Manifesto says it (the Manifesto) was written in January, 1986, after his arrest. But the raid on Steve Jackson Games was in 1990, right? Was the arrest unrelated to the raid? Because SJ Games says that no one was ever arrested, indicted, or even interviewed after the raid. But the Usenet Archive post of the article in Phrack says "This was the last published file written by The Mentor. Shortly after releasing it, he was busted by the FBI. The Mentor, sadly missed." I'm just learning about those events now, and the WP articles have me confused. Was there an FBI "bust," then the Manifesto, then a period of work at SJ Games while still operating the BBS (after having been busted for something else), then the Secret Service raid? Dcs002 (talk) 04:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was he arrested? 

message: Quote from the lead paragraph: "He also wrote the cyberpunk role-playing sourcebook GURPS Cyberpunk, which, due to his involvement, was confiscated by the U.S. Secret Service." There's a BLP problem in that statement. "Due to his involvement" means that Blankenship did something that necessitated the manuscript seizure (not confiscation) by being involved with something (which is not defined). However, the source materials say that the Secret Service not only seized the manuscript as part of a wrongful action on their part, not Blankenship's (court findings), that the judge in the case reprimanded the Secret Service for their incompetence in handling the case, and that neither the Secret Service nor any prosecutor has brought a case to court to show that Blankenship had done anything wrong that would justify the raid and seizures (let alone proven such a case). The raid & seizure were all about the Secret service, not Blankenship. It doesn't matter if Loyd has seen this version and not said anything about it, or even endorsed it. (That would be primary sourcing.) BLP breaches are cause for immediate action, so I'm re-wording that sentence so it's consistent with the public record & WP policy. (My apologies if my tone is a bit harsh. I'm trying to be specific, not arrogant & angry.) Dcs002 (talk) 05:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This copy of the warrant affidavit used in the case, states that he was arrested, basically because he, as The Mentor, posted on a BBS called The Phoenix Project, a message explaining what Kermit was, as part of a supposed illegal password decryption service.--Auric (talk) 01:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Due to his involvement?
Talk:Werburgh

message: Inconsistency here - lead sentence says 699, info box says 597 ......  ??  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Category says 699 too, and the Catholic Encyclopedia also says 699. -- Roleplayer (talk) 15:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed infobox dates to conform with text.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: Are we right to call Werburgh English? The Kingdom of England hadn't formed for another few centries. Wasn't she Mercian instead? See also WP:UKNATIONALS --Jza84 |  Talk   12:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it says she's an English saint, and that's fair enough. Saying she was born in Staffs, which I never noticed before, and which didn't exist until the 10th century, is a bit weird though.  Angus McLellan  (Talk) 12:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Duly amended.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed England as a location from the infobox as an anachronism. I still think "Saxon saint" or equivalent might be more appropriate, but whatever you guys think - I'll trust. :-) --Jza84 |  Talk   13:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English? 

message: The article as it stands doesn't tell us why or when she was sainted. It should. Peynirli (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canonisation 
Template talk:Gadsden County, Florida

message: Here are the major population centers of Gadsden County, FL, along with the latest population figures (and dates) given in the Wikipedia articles:
Quincy - 6,975 (2004)
Chattahoochee - 3,720 (2005)
Havana - 1,703 (2004)
Gretna - 1,701 (2004)
Midway - 1,446 (2000)
Greensboro - 615 (2004)
Town, per the article, is usually in the "few hundred to several thousand" range, but can be much larger. Havana, Gretna, Midway, and Greensboro all fit that definition. Cities are larger than towns, and Quincy and Chattahoochee fit that idea.The local unincorporated communities have no populations listed, but may be expected to have small populations in comparison to any of those listed above.
I will now revise the template and the articles to match. Please do not change these modifications unless you have some supporting logic. Tim Ross (talk) 13:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All municipalities in the USA are categorised by their official legal status, which is recorded by the Census Bureau.  You have not provided any reliable sources to say that the Census Bureau has misunderstood the official legal status of these municipalities.  Nyttend (talk) 15:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

text: The Census Bureau's source is the  on the article.  It's been there for several years.  Nyttend (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities and Towns
Talk:Wolfgang of Regensburg

message: Check the artwork, is that "St. Wolfgang and the devil" or "St. Augustine and the devil" ? If we see the image description, it says that it is the former one. St. Wolfgang is definitely not known as St. Augustine too right?Olentz
I noticed the same thing. Maybe it should be removed from this page.`Padness 10:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree concur: 
http://www.crisismagazine.com/2013/st-wolfgang-and-the-church-the-devil-built
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2013/11/how-a-saint-tricked-the-devil/
http://www.allposters.com/-sp/St-Wolfgang-and-the-Devil-Life-of-St-Wolfgang-1471-1475-Posters_i12143943_.htm
https://www.google.com/search?q=saint+wolfgang+and+the+devil&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4xNqXoaDKAhWIKJQKHY2rCzYQ_AUIBygB&biw=1366&bih=604#imgrc=WSVP2GyzrNbXmM%3A
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_of_Regensburg
119.92.93.84 (talk) 22:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name on artwork

message: What kind of deal did St. Wolfgang make with the devil?  Does anyone have a story? Blue Rasberry 15:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I cannot recall the story now. But Saint Wolfgang tricked the devil into building the church for him.119.92.93.84 (talk) 22:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Story of deal with devil
Talk:Hugo Bezdek

message: I couldn't find any records of Delaware Valley's (then known as The National Farm School) archived results, so I had to work backwards to get the 1949 record. We know that Bezdek's career collegiate coaching record was 127-58-16, with a combined record of 124-53-16 at Oregon, Arkansas, and Penn State. That leaves a record of 3-5-0 unaccounted for. 
We know that Bezdek coached the Mare Island team to a win in the 1918 Rose Bowl after the 1917 season at Oregon. I don't know if that win is included in his career total, but I'm going to assume that it is. That leaves his season at DelVal as 2-5-0. -- Billma 20:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: College coaching record
Talk:Bozzio Levin Stevens

message: This article seems kind of "breathless" in tone. I thought maybe it was text from a review site but a few quick google searches were fruitless for me. I think maybe the article needs to be a bit more neutral, and where it uses phrases like most respected, greatest, etc... cites to external reviews might be good. ++Lar: t/c 14:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:801 (band)

message: I guess if I looked around some more I might find the answer as to why but I just thought I'd comment here (now, while I'm thinking of it) that searching Wikipedia for "801" did not lead to this page (or anything else.)  I had to find this via Brian Eno.  I did find the article but it seems like a lot of people (thousands of fans?) searching for 801 on Wikipedia will not find them. IanHistor 14:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia searching 

message: I think that the current lineup section is bogus and intentionally misleading. The IP for the person who did the edits was flagged for silliness. I've searched around and cannot find any information of a new line up. I'll keep searching, but I think it should be changed so as to not confuse people. Jasonnolan (talk) 12:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've purged all the "current lineup" stuff. As far as I can tell, it was all pure vandalism- there's zero reportage on an 801 reunion anywhere online, there's nothing linking Andy Mackay or Mick Jones to 801 anywhere except this vandalized Wiki page, and the supposed reunion wasn't even mentioned in the body text of the article. Yspaddadenpenkawr (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source for 'current lineup'.
Talk:Global Relief Foundation

message: I saw you created Global Relief Foundation.  I changed the way it references your source.
Is the Foundation's ties to terrorism really established, in a court of law, for instance?
The Treasury Department answers to the Attorney General I believe.  And the Attorney General
in 2002 was John Ashcroft.  Ashcroft was not an honest official.  He distorted various other
terror cases.  He claimed, for instance, that his Department helped thwart a plot to blow up 
Federal buildings in Ottawa.  That plot turned out to be a complete fabrication on the part
of intelligence officials.  
The idea of "six degrees of separation" should be required reading for all US counter-terrorism
intelligence officials.  --  Geo Swan 14:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Geo, to be honest, I don't know how the case shook out or if charges were ever pressed. A small point: I don't think Treasury answers to Justice and even if they did, we can't really say "Oh, Ashcroft is horrible, everything he does is suspect," even if it's true (and believe me, I am no fan of the guy). An even smaller point: I really don't like ref tags. I noticed you put them on the Hawash article, and here. You might check out policy on those tags. IronDuke 14:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Relief Foundation 

message: Another contributor recently addedd a  tag to this article.  But, although the instantiation of that tag tells readers to look to the article's talk page for a more detailed explanation, the person who placed the tag didn't offer one.
They didn't even state whether they thought the article was biased in favor of the US government, and against Global Relief Foundation -- or vice versa.
I am going to ask them to leave an explanation for their concern here.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The reason is that, although the article is short, 90% of the article is about the treasury departments freezing of it's assets. To balance the article we really need more about the org itself and it's history etc and the 'counter opinion'.--neon white talk 02:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added some more countering of the allegations. --neon white talk 02:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, I disagree that an article lapses from compliance with WP:NPOV if it neutrally covers all of the WP:RS.  If the "other side" of the story is covered in less detail, because of a lack of WP:RS, this is not a lapse from WP:NPOV.  Geo Swan (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It wasn't really covered at all despite it being reported, regardless an article still needs to maintain a neutral bias. I think the issue is resolved for now. It's possible that further info may become available, i believe the case remains essentially open. --neon white talk 02:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|pov}}...