Talk:The Wilderness Society (Australia)

message: Just in case there is a backlash with changes in this article, it reads like no NPOV is in operation in this article, as the TWS and its members were not necessarily connected to either the UTG or Greens in the way the article is written is suggesting.60.230.244.206 04:59, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, should be resolved. the non-partisan policy information is from a collegue who has volunteered for TWS previously. it might be availiable on the web somewhere, I haven't looked. --naught101 10:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier conversations

message: the organisation is now known as simply "The Wilderness Society", not the "Tasmanian Wilderness Society," as seen on their website
the page should be moved to 
* The Wilderness Society 
* The Wilderness Society, Australia or
* The (Australian) Wilderness Society due to there being another organisation of the same name in America
perhaps there should be a disambiguation page?--naught101 09:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: done, perhaps there still needs to be a disambiguation page, but maybe we can wait for the american TWS to appear first.--naught101 09:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  page moving 

message: is there such a word? oh well
what's the factual accuracy dispute for? --naught101 10:03, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  factualitly 

message: *Support move to The Wilderness Society (Australia) and leaving this as a dab page.  Vegaswikian 04:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New move request 

message: Removed red link in intro Land Clearing it has been there for a long time, no one has worked upon it, and even if it is an issue, wilderness was a primary issue.  Someone wants to pick it up again - please do but at least get red of the red link! User:SatuSuro 01:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro red link

message: A red link user has attempted to place this term in the first sentence.  It is inappropriate, on the basis if the WS is described as 'radical' - what does this then make Gunns ? SatuSuro 06:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Radical?

message: :Image:TWS-Logo Green006944 trans150.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TWS-Logo Green006944 trans150.gif