Talk:2004 Madrid train bombings/Archive 9

message: Guys, I do not see you taking steps to Wikipedia:Requests for mediation.
I can not do this job because I always connect from "filtered" institutional net-access, and following those steps could result in new, undesired, controversial "truncation" of words by the software. I do not want that happenning.
Could you please follow the instructions in the link I provided?. Thank you.Randroide 10:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randroide Answers to ''"Next Step"'' 

message: Randroide 17:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All sources used should be accessible to all readers of the article
Very funny, Southofwatford. 
I am going to follow this joke of yours.
*Please propose also the deletion of all books as sources, because, did you know?, there is always someone without this or that book.
*Delete all references to TV or radio stations, because that user in Brazil has no TV and no radio at home.
*Delete all the references in spanish, because, did you know?, there are users who know no spanish.
It´s a pleasure to read this kind of funny jokes, really. I had a good laugh.
----
User:Southofwatford 15:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Southofwatford wrote: Equally, in the English Wikipedia I would argue that choosing a Spanish or other foreign language source when an equally valid source exists in English does not make sense
Are you going follow this piece of advice of yours and going to delete all the assertions on the article based in sources in spanish, Southofwatford?. Or are you going to start searching for alternative sources in english?. 
I am not going to oppose that "interesting" course of action you suggested. Please, do it, Southofwatford: Put your money (i.e., your time) where your mouth is.
----
Southofwatford 08:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randroide answers to ''New reference by Burgas00'' 

message: Any comment on this?
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/espana/policia/desbarata/montaje/sostener/teoria/conspirativa/torno/11-M/elpepunac/20061202elpepinac_14/Tes
--Burgas00 18:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New reference by Burgas00 

message: Southofwatford 14:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Igor21 wrote: ...until arbitration decides if El Mundo...[]...can be be used as source
No, Igor21. That´s not going to be the point of mediation.
The point of the mediation is going to be a definition about which sources are valid to the article. Allegations will be presented against several sources, not only against "El Mundo".
----
Radroide : Yes, you want to do the oposite thing. Get rid of all the sources except El Mundo since for you is the only newspaper in the world that is not written by the same evil hand that conspires in the shadows.--Igor21 19:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation Request 

message: Randroide 14:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Igor21 wrote: ...until arbitration decides if El Mundo...[]...can be be used as source
No, Igor21. That´s not going to be the point of mediation.
The point of the mediation is going to be a definition about which sources are valid to the article. Allegations will be presented against several sources, not only against "El Mundo".
----
Radroide : Yes, you want to do the oposite thing. Get rid of all the sources except El Mundo since for you is the only newspaper in the world that is not written by the same evil hand that conspires in the shadows.--Igor21 19:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randroide answers