lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Reto Zanni

message: Hello, to my recollection, the guy in Basel's jersey is not Reto Zanni. So whoever set up this Wikipedia page should replace the picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.241.66.39 (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Thank you for noticing this. I have removed the picture. The Basel player was in fact Michel Morganella.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.53.24 (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed picture
Talk:Mahshid Moshiri

message: We need some independent references to show that this woman is notable.
I have chopped out the bibliography since it was far too long. Put the full bibliography on your website, madam. Here, restrict yourself to no more than six of your most important works. -- RHaworth 08:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did you get this rule (about six books)?. The common tradition in Wikipedia is to list all novels of a novelist or all academic books of an academician (no matter if they are 2 or 20). If you insist on restricting the list to 6 items, you should show a policy or a guideline that supports you.  BorzooB 17:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Verein Deutscher Ingenieure

message: The article says the VDI is comparable to the "American Society of Civil Engineers". Members of the VDI are not only civil engineers but also mechanical engineers, electrical engineers and all other types of engineers. Therefore I doubt it is comparable with the beforementioned association. --138.246.7.84 09:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2007

message: More than 12,000 honorary experts process the latest technical findings each year to promote the technology location.
:"...the technology location"? Does that mean Germany? If so, I'd say "...to promote technology in Germany." – AndyFielding (talk) 02:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Solectria Sunrise

message: This article is not intended to be an advertisement, since the vehicle was never manufactured.
:Please re-write the first paragraph, it reads like an advertisement. Also, please build notability. DarthGriz98 01:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, remove the email at the bottom. DarthGriz98 01:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The "Solectria Corporation" link automatically redirects to this page, when there is some information on the company on the Azure Dynamics page. I suggest a split and make "Solectria Corporation" a new page, and not a redirect to this page.
 18:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Solectria Corporation from Solectria Sunrise
Talk:Danny Aiello III

message: No reference to his death anywhere, none of the links confirm it either.  Deaths in 2010 page has the link http://www.northjersey.com/obituaries/92647484_Danny_Aiello_III_dies__actor_s_son__stuntman.html but as I said it's not referenced here...cause of death isn't even mentioned.  Also, that page says he was 53 while Di2010 says 50 78.86.230.62 (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This link confirms death from pancreatic cancer. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead?
Talk:Lalbagh, Mangalore

message: I suggest renaming this page to Lalbagh, Mangalore.--PremKudvaTalk 09:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If that name is available, you can do it  --Crazysoul 09:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is available, I will move it now.--PremKudvaTalk 10:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename to
Category talk:Compositions by Gaspar Cassadó

message: These three articles are so short that they should be part of the stub-class page on Gaspar Cassadó. I have already copied them there, as part of a general tidy up of that page. Unless there are objections in the next week or so, I propose shall delete these three articles and their category (which isn't exhaustive) which would leave all relevant information on the Cassadó page. At the moment, everything is easily contained there. If the entries for various pieces get longer, or more are written, then we should consider new pages. There is no use in having a link to a new page for a sentence or two. JH(emendator) 09:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:Camp Massad (Poconos)

message: What's "The Massad Movement"?  Vonfraginoff (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movement? 

message: the Forward and the Jewish Week disagree on the 1941 origins: the Forward puts the day camp in the Catskills and the Jewish Week has it in Far Rockoway.
-----
I've added a link to a picture of the 1941 staff. My mother, Marcia Moskowitz (nee Slochowsky) is kneeling at the lower left.  She worked as a secretary for Shlomo Shulsinger.  
LenMinNJ (talk) 18:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins
Talk:The Tribuna of the Uffizi (Zoffany)

message: In the Paintings table, the (left-hand) thumbnail of Zoffany's painting of Raphael's John the Baptist is actually the Madonna del cardellino. I don't know how to correct it, so I'm noting it here and hoping whoever does know is watching.
Regulov (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: done. Johnbod (talk) 17:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong thumbnail picture 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Johan Zoffany - Tribuna of the Uffizi - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 15, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-04-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Johan Zoffany - Tribuna of the Uffizi - Google Art Project.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: User:Cloptonson has brought up at Talk:Other Windsor, 6th Earl of Plymouth that the dates don't line up for Other Windsor, 6th Earl of Plymouth to be in this painting. He was born 1789, died 1833. Other Windsor, 5th Earl of Plymouth was 1751-1799 which would work better given this painting was painted 1772–1778. I can't find a good source for it either way though. Woody (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore the bit about sourcing, the RCT has him listed as the 5th Earl. I've corrected it here and moved the image from the 6th Earl to the 5th Earl. Woody (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Other Windsor, 6th Earl of Plymouth]]
Talk:Rya Kihlstedt

message: Why the hell don't actors' agents earn their keep and provide Wikipedia with a photo of their clients?!?TodKarlson (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

message: There is a dispute over the last name of Alice from Home Alone 3 due to conflicting sources. Please see the Talk Page of Home Alone 3 for more information and to keep the discussion in one place. (Tk420 (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name of Alice from Home Alone 3.
Template talk:Towns in Macedon Ranges Shire

message: Hi, I am unsure of procedure for editing templates, can anyone help? Currently the link for Springfield in the Macedon Ranges Shire is directed to the wrong 'Springfield' as no article exists for this one as yet. Is there a convention to titling articles about two different places with the same name? Scottius11 (talk) 01:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Link has been fixed see this edit for a bit of a "how to" As for what we call "disambiguating". the guide for Australian towns can be seen at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places)#Australia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian places#General strategy and discussion forums. This template probably does not get watched by many people so to get a quick response on issues like this one, perhaps Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board will get a quicker response. -- Mattinbgn\talk 01:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Category talk:Introductory articles

message: I think calling these articles 'introductions' is a bad idea in many ways. Mostly it sounds like the name for a class that you need to start through in order to qualify for the tougher one. Introducing someone to the subject is not the goal anyway. The goal should be to have a series of articles that are overviews of topics contained in more detailed articles. A summary, if you will, which shouldn't violate WP:CFORK because it's like a spinout, though more aptly considered a spinup (or something).
I think the articles should be called Overviews.--Neptunerover (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad name 

message: There is a  deletion discussion for Basic concepts of quantum mechanics, an attempt to describe quantum mechanics at an even more basic level than Introduction to quantum mechanics. RockMagnetist (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A third level of introduction? 

message: I think this category would be more useful in mainspace. RockMagnetist (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A reader curious in but without prior knowledge or expertise in multiple technical subjects should be able to navigate using this category. Gizza (t)(c) 13:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this a hidden category? 

message: Please review the Prerequisites Project suggestion. Editingeddie (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prerequisites Project
Talk:St. Joseph's Academy (Baton Rouge)

message: I've started going through the article and adding some citations.Gantiganti (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:St. Michael the Archangel High School (East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana)

message: This article sounds like an ad. As of right now, it is in SERIOUS need of being rewritten. I didn't mark it for speedy deletion, because it can be fixed. It does not need to be completely scrapped.
Fabioli2010 (talk) 01:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ad 
Talk:Dark Wind Blowing

message: User:Ccb2007 says the empty headings are for the purposes of a class exercise, which will take place in the next few days and will facilitate the writing of this article. -- Beland 18:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class project 

message: Im going to go ahead and add a small bit to this as I have read it. Do you need references? I have the read the book but there are very few resources on the internet for this book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foshiznay (talk • contribs) 09:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Go Ahead
Talk:Myx

message: I propose the section Myx#Programming be split into a separate page called List of programs broadcast by Myx. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 04:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal of Myx#Programming to List of programs broadcast by Myx
Talk:Episcopal School of Baton Rouge

message: An IP user who has made some disruptive edits changed a sentence to "The boys' cross-country team has won 21 state AA titles in a row (1996–2016)." - incrementing the number of years from 20 to 21 - and changing 2015 to 2016. It seems as if this could be a real change.
It's not cited, so I have no way of knowing. Is this correct?--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 
Talk:Woodlawn High School (East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana)

message: I've tried to clean up and expand the Woodlawn article.  Quite a bit of addtional information can be added about the History and about Athletics but I dont have the information readily available.  I also need some images that are OK for wiki which I dont have/cant find and cant get any new ones until my next trip to Baton Rouge.  If someone can add them, that would help quite a bit too.Bgautrea (talk) 02:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and expansion

message: Moved Woodlawn High School (Louisiana) to current page.  This is to match the standards of WikiProject Schools. I relinked all but the auto generated links to the old title.Bgautrea (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: I removed the 2 alumni that 24.255.80.194 added for 2 reasons:  1) they were added into a paragraph that clearly was the subject of the basketball team, not alumni 2) while 1 alumni has a wiki about him, the other was uncited thus putting 1 alumni into a ==Notable alumni== would look bad.  I'd like to hear more ideas or see more alumni added (with appropriate citations).Bgautrea (talk) 17:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni
Talk:Science and Industry Museum

message: I am going here in a months time so I will take dozens of pictures for wikipedia.
Fethroesforia 10:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: pictures

message: The Museum has recently been rebranded as MoSI (Museum of Science and Industry) see ... is this article going to change to reflect the rebranding? (79.67.121.184)  —Preceding comment was added at 13:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The museum has now been rebranded to the Science and Industry Museum 29 August 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScienceandIndustryManchester (talk • contribs) 14:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: "Grade I listed" doesn't make sense to me.  I assume someone (who?) has a list which ranks things (what? buildings?) by "grade" (on what criteria?), but the article fails to explain these points.  It should say something like "have both been listed as Grade I sasquatch-friendly buildings by the Elbonian Ministry of the Interior".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.9.80 (talk) 08:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Grade I listed
Category talk:Alternate history films

message: It seems to me that "The Day After" should be on this list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim Nightshade (talk • contribs) 06:14, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Addition 

message: I have a couple questions as to how these films were chosen for this category.  Some make sense (i.e. 2009 Lost Memories, Watchmen or Fatherland).  Although I will say Fatherland should be piped directly to the section about the film.  Now, my question is: Why is Air Force One and Dave included?  Because the events in the film never happened?  Guess we should put every single completely fictional movie in this category, then.  Why include Dave but not My Fellow Americans?  As for Cold War-era films like Red Dawn and Amerika, I don't think they belong here, solely because they were made when they were a possible future, not a "imagine something went wrong in the past … and this happened" type of thing.  After all, The Day After isn't listed here, right?  I don't want to unilaterally delete any titles without some discussion, but if I don't get some kind of explanation within the next couple days, I'm going through this with a machete.  --MicahBrwn (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria 

message: The following films were removed because they weren't true "alternate history" films.  
* Air Force One
* Dave
* Clear and Present Danger (film)
* Dick
* Red Dawn
* Amerika
* First on the Moon
The Cold-War era films Red Dawn and Amerika were removed because they were portraying a possible future, not a possible present if the past had diverged.  Movies like Dave and Clear and Present Danger were removed because they were portraying a fictional present, not a divergence of the past.  First on the Moon does come close, but as it was a mockumentary much along the lines of Dark Side of the Moon; that is, something that one shouldn't take too seriously, it's out.  --MicahBrwn (talk) 00:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed films
Talk:Bunding

message: I have added a few details of bunding failures. Peterlewis 10:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term bunding is also used to describe vertical bank protection, often in the form of sheet piling. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other usages
Talk:Exponential utility

message: The formula is currently u(c)=1-e^{-a c}/a, which is not the most convenient form. The most used form of this utility function is when only risk-aversion (a>0) is allowed and the formula is u(c)=1-e^{-a c}. The 1 is only for the convenience of having non-negative utility. If we want to allow non-risk-aversion behavior then we to allow for a \leq 0. To keep utility increasing in c that means we need to divide by a. But in order to maintain the reason for the 1 we need to define it as u(c)=(1-e^{-a c})/a so that it stays positive (this is not the case with the current formula). We also need to define the formula for a=0 (risk-neutrality) which should be u(c)=c. I think we should note in the article the simple (only risk-aversion) formula and then the 2-case setup allowing any risk preference. --Bequw (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula
Talk:East-Central Minnesota Pride

message: Alpha News is an unreliable source of information and should not be used. WP:RS
* |  |  |  
Myotus (talk) 03:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Alpha News as source
Talk:Overton Brooks

message: 'He decried inflated home prices and large federal withholding rates from paychecks so that many could "barely buy groceries." May claimed that Brooks had given tacit support of a "Marxist" foreign policy: We cannot return sanity in foreign affairs by returning to Congress the same men who got us into this mess."'
This is indeed a mess: a) one of the quotation marks appears to have been omitted: I assume it should be inserted before "We" b) "May" is surely a typo, perhaps for "Many" c) a link ought to be added to "federal withholding", I assume Tax withholding but I don't know. Harfarhs (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1952
Talk:Hans Tobeason

message: Tobeason is credited as one of three writers on the 2003 Star Trek Enterprise episode Bounty in season 2. That appears to be his sole writing credit for the show. I have not yet determined if he worked on the show as a producer/co-producer or for how long. (There is a team of writers, far more contributors than those who get final writing credit on any script.) 
If the article was longer it might be worth mentioning but at the moment the article is so short it would be undue emphasis to mention a single episode writing credit, when the article barely mentions other shows he worked on for years. -- 109.76.132.146 (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Trek
Talk:The New Canada

message: This article consists almost entirely of a review and summary by User:R-41 written from 2007 to 2011 when User: R-41 was blocked. The  was removed in 2008 even though there were no references besides the book itself. User R-41 noted that they had added references in 2009 but this was referring to inline citations detailing page numbers from Manning's book, not reviews or summaries from others about the book. There are no references and no reviews as of December 2018. I have replaced the maintenance tag.Oceanflynn (talk) 20:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite reviews, don't write them
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-07-16/Two new bureaucrats

message: "The fact that Ral315 is the editor of the Signpost was a major concern in the nomination."
:Not quite. The concern was that he would continue as editor. Haukur 11:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I will fix that. FunPika 11:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Haukur 11:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Signpost issue

message: "User:JodyB had given an additional support after Raul654 closed the nomination. It was reverted by User:WJBscribe 4 minutes later."
Why is this relevant at all? SalaSkan (Review me) 01:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: JodyB

message: Why do we have commentary on, and a large quotation from, an April RFB? This article is terribly confusing and badly laid out imho. --kingboyk 23:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 April
Talk:Katsuya Onizuka

message: Akira Kouchiyama
I think that the first edition of this is the translation from the Japanese version. However, this article has no information about the inheritance of the page history from that. Therefore, I strongly suspect that this is a GFDL violation. Moreover the Japanese version hadn't specified any source, and hasn't been a reliable information. Almost all the articles created by this user seem to have a same GFDL problem. Thanks. --Akira Kouchiyama 17:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As with the others, it's close enough (not everything was pulled but enough was), so attributed. Wizardman 15:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly copyvio
Talk:Demand curve

message: There is currently no separate article for the supply curve- only Supply, which discusses the general economic concept as well as the graphical representation of it. We should probably be consistent about this, so I'm proposing that we merge this article with Demand. Are there any objections? Montgolfière (talk) 16:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Switching the merge target has been uncontested for a while, so I've changed the templates to reflect that; let's move discussion to the newly proposal target at Talk:Supply and demand. Klbrain (talk) 17:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Note that we also have the Inverse demand function. Викидим (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we merge this article with [[Demand]]?
Talk:Something So Strong

message: Just wondering what the source is on the lack of Australian release...because I've got an Australian issue copy of the 7"!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Museumofinanity (talk • contribs) 08:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what you're talking about. We indicate not only that it exists, but that it reached #18 on the ARIA Singels Chart. --lincalinca 10:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Museumofinanity was indicating this statement which was later removed by that user: "achieving #18 in the group's local ARIA Charts, however as no formal single was released in Australia, this position was reached from airplay only." RaNdOm26 (talk) 11:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian single release
Talk:9-simplex

message: The article is called Decayotton but its first sentence says "A decazetton, or deca-9-tope is a 9-simplex ...". So which is the correct name - decayotton ot decazetton ? Also, a reference would be nice, to confirm that this is not a neologism - neither word gets any non-Wiki Google hits. Gandalf61 11:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Simplex name

message: Point isn't put across well enough, see Talk:Heptapeton. 4 T C 03:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Yotton
Talk:It's Only Natural (song)

message: For some reason, this page says that crowded house is a New Zealand band, but every other page says that they're an aussie band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.103.127 (talk) 07:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: The Crowded House wiki page has their origin listed as Melbourne, Australia. Neil Finn has even said that they were an Australian band. Just because one or two people were from NZ, doesn't make them New Zealand. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10407272 
MadMark80 (talk) 19:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian/New Zealand band??  
Talk:Rupert (name)

message: I would like to assert (scientifically) that the name Rupert is giga cringe.
reasons:
1. Rupert
2. See above
need I say more? 2001:4CA0:0:F234:1496:FAAE:C462:1024 (talk) 11:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rupert cringe
Talk:Chocolate Cake (song)

message: The notion that "Chocolate Cake" was not a hit in the US because of its supposedly insulting lyrics is ridiculous.  It's just not a very catchy tune.
:It was successful everywhere else. It wasn't successful there (according to Rolling Stone, Billboard and even commented upon by Robert Christgau) primarily due to its inflammatory remarks. I can find references to each of these allegations I'm making, so I'm reverting the edit and I'll find the refs I need. --lincalinca 04:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please elaborate? What's "dumb" about the Crowded House entries? --lincalinca 01:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what on earth?