Talk:National Express Coaches

message: Can someone do a piece on the recent north east railway franchise won by national express?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.242.148.228 (talk) 08:39, August 23, 2007 (UTC) 
Vehicle involved in the accident on 3 Sept 2007 is a Scania Irizar reg no YN55 PXC. This is operated by Bebb Travel, part of Veolia Transport. They have been operating this route since June 2007, after they took over services previously operated by Travel West Midlands  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.196.244 (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The article should be updated now that all of NEG's railway franchises are to carry the National Express brand name. 217.155.20.163 (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you mean? This is the coach page, I think you mean National Express GroupMickMacNee (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated - National Express Group#Planned rebranding MickMacNee (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rail franchises

message: National Express name is more synonymous with its parent company so this should be moved for disambiguation, with (after the move, if it goes ahead) National Express redirecting to National Express Group. Simply south (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: National Express Coaches, perhaps if a move is needed. MRSC • Talk 15:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it has been rebranded this according to the website, so i am going to close early and move it here. For evidence, see the NX page  Simply south (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

text: As proposed, I'm going to start this discussion at the National Express Group talk page as that page is the least likely one to change name. MickMacNee (talk) 18:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion now here MickMacNee (talk) 18:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Btline (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NXC.png

message: I've just amended the caption on an image of a coach in the 'arrow on blue and red circles' livery from 'the old livery' to 'the previous livery', because (a) that livery isn't that old and (b) when somebody talks about the 'old National Express livery', I think of white coaches with the National Bus Company's 'red and blue arrow'.
Which makes me think that we need a picture of a coach in that livery to round off the collection in this article. Can anybody contribute one?. -- Chris j wood (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of the old livery

message: The image :Image:National Express Logo.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:National Express Logo.gif

message: The entire text of 2007 National Express coach accidents was copied here after its AfD. While a merge was well within consensus, the Incidents section is now almost as long as the rest of the article, which seems like an undue weight violation. However, since all of the content is sourced, removing any of it is likely to be controversial, especially when much of the rest of the article is less well sourced. Any suggestions? Alzarian16 (talk) 11:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight issues 

message: ..whether we should include (all supported by evidence) the proposition that coach travel in the UK does not have a good press. It's not just that I personally do not want to spend five hours (on a journey which would take two by train), nor risk life long depression and nightmares by frequenting Victoria Coach station,nor sit next to a pensioner who insists on deshelling a boiled egg and says "it's the best way to travel and make friends, nor have to bribe the driver to handle ones luggage, nor stop at motorway service stations to drink warm pop at £8 a throw and risk drowning (or sexual abuse) in the toilet... no it's not my personal view here but the recorded problems faced by National Express.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.126.68 (talk) 13:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I wonder

message: I've removed some parts that are more of an advertisement than a statement of facts, however, readers should be aware that this article reads like an advertisement generally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.169.66 (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement