lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ganja goo ball

message: Think you're all HIGH and mighty?  Nuh-uh, get with it, goo balls are here to stay.  Space cakes rule and all you fools drool.  4 2 0  4eva.
This was not a test, ROY BOY, SUCKER, butt munch with whom i wont go out to lunch, this was no test.  I was serious about goo balls as a wiki topic, but you made me question the legitimacy of that and now i can never feel the same about goo.  This sucks of you.  I'm just trying to be cool.  Trying to make friends on the net... people who also enjoy goo balls.  You're making this very difficult for me.  I'm sad  : (
:I'll see what I can do to get back the goo. - RoyBoy 800 23:09, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

message: So, what, you just mix it all up and press into balls?  Don't you need some heat to get the cannabinoids into the fats/oils? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lf1033 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no heat? 

message: Disagree with a redirect, especially if the content isn't going to be fully merged. I see instructions on cannabutter in the parent article, but that doesn't seem sufficient. - RoyBoy 800 16:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  That said, I've never heard of a "ganja goo ball", and the dicussion at the top of this page would seem to indicate that it's a contrived term. --Hiddekel 16:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, ganja goo ball is a real thing. Ie heard about it on many sites and from many people. Im not sure how exactly it is made, but they are definatly real. Debeo Morium 19:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Kitchen Debate

message: The original text is :
Khrushchev: "Don't you have a machine that puts food into the mouth and pushes it down? Many things you've shown us are interesting but they are not needed in life. They have no useful purpose. They are merely gadgets. We have a saying, if you have bedbugs you have to catch one and pour boiling water into the ear."
the statment in the article about the "machine that put food into the mouth and pushes it down" is misleading...
now corrected to "satirically asked if".
--Hkchan123 08:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About "machine that put food into the mouth and pushes it down" 

message: Can anyone find the Soviet opinion of the debate?  So many of the Soviet Union articles only talk about American thoughts on the matter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.90.128.73 (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. Four years on, I've tagged the article as needing to be more balanced in this regard. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance =

message: "A more complete version" of the kitchen debate text is said to be on a turnerlearning site, but the link has not been working for several months. I cannot find other webpage that contain full text of this debate, but if there's somebody who knows one, please fix it. Shaind (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An External link doesn't work 

message: I blanked this section for a consensus. I'm not sure how we could word it, but I believe it would be warranted to mention how grossly improbable this irradiation story is. Ionizing radiation cannot be turned on or off for the purposes of detection unless it is an X-ray (which would require a bulky power supply that couldn't be easily concealed) or a radioisotope in a shielded container with a moveable aperture perhaps. An atomic battery (in the attic!) was suggested as a source. At the time, those contained gamma emitting isotopes which could be detected by the dosimeter, however they wouldn't have that aperture and the distribution of the radiation also makes that sound implausible. The atomic battery story was even doubted by Golden it says. It sounds like the dosimeters were a quartz fiber type, which only detected gamma and X-ray at the time. I don't know if this was a cold war psyop, or some sort of malfunction of the dosimeters due to a static field perhaps. — THORNFIELD HALL (Talk) 09:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiation
Talk:Togoland

message: The German empire used the style for its governors during certain periods in the history of its rule over the following Schutzgebiete:
As with the other former German colonies, the coat of arms is incorrect and was never used. These were suggested but never implemented. This should really be changed . . . 195.102.24.108 (talk) 16:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved over from [[Landeshauptmann]]

message: Should either of the flags below (on commons) whch are listed as the flags of Togoland be used in the article? Brigade Piron (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks for bringing up the issue- I'm not sure the one on the right is actually the flag.  I think it was more of a state emblem.  This is just a quick answer.  My recollection is that the one on the left was closer to the actual flag--but that image isn't great. I'll see if I can't figure that out this week.  AbstractIllusions (talk) 03:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I know wikipedia isn't an RS but there is interesting (probably OR) content about this over at .  Essentially-the flags were proposed and some plans were drawn up for them to be implemented.  I can't find a photo of Togoland at the time that has any of these flags displayed. Indeed, in contrast, if they have a flag it is the German Imperial Flag, see: here. I think I'd be wary about including the flags without an RS clearly establishing their credibility. Even if we put proposed flag--that seems problematic. What are you thinking? AbstractIllusions (talk) 04:50, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, it makes sense to use the more generic :File:Reichskolonialflagge.svg instead.—Brigade Piron (talk) 18:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Brigade Piron. That is the flag that I feel most comfortable with. However, an IP re-added one of the other flags. AGF and there appears to be some relevant expertise in the editing. I hope he/she will join this conversation. I'm very willing to be convinced that one of the other flags should be used. AbstractIllusions (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: >The total number of German officials in the colony was only 12 in 1890.[6]   
…  
> Colonial officials built roads and bridges toward the interior mountain ranges and three rail lines from the capital, Lomé: along the coast to Aného in 1905, to Palime (modern Kpalimé) in 1907, and the longest line, the Hinterlandbahn, to Atakpamé by 1911.[8] By 1914, over 1,000 km[9] of roads had been constructed by the colonial office.[6]
Being a German, I would like to cite [the translation] of a great German poet to illustrate my claim:
https://ahistoricality.blogspot.com/2005/11/thursday-poem-questions-from-worker.html
The article's wording just is not right.
89.245.98.150 (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I doubt that  German colonial officials  built Togoland's infrastructure
Talk:Erling Dekke Næss

message: Den største skipsrederen Norge har hatt? Noen snakker om Reksten, andre er blendet av Fredriksen. Jeg mener Næss er den smarteste og dyktigste skipsrederen Norge har hatt. Ikke bare hadde han utdannelse fra LSE, men han jobbet og i NORTRASHIP og var en av de første til å benytte internasjonale kapitalmarkeder for alt det de er verdt. ED Næss pionerte også bruken av flags of convenience. Et genialt trekk. Bare se på market cap'en på Zapata Næss på slutten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.217.57 (talk) 23:21, October 10, 2005 (UTC)
:Someone feel free to translate this comment... __meco 09:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment in Norwegian

message: I edited a sentence which had  "Jr.." at the end. The two letters "Jr" are an English abbreviation for the word "Junior" and, as with all English abbreviations, they are immediately followed by a period. But the punctuation rule is that when a sentence ends in an abbreviation there is only one period: "An abbreviating period, however, is never omitted before a mark of sentence punctuation unless the latter is the period terminating the sentence:..." So I removed the extra period. Nick Beeson (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Period 
Talk:Red Devils (supporters club)

message: Expanded article and changed to 'start' status. Please expand article more if you are knowledgable. Btw, seems like the two above issues (image use & disambiguation page) have been resolved already. Nuyos (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer stub

message: To be grammatically correct, an apostrophe should be added to the article title: "Red Devils (supporters' club)"
Just saying. Schwede66 00:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguator
Talk:Says You!

message: I just changed "Dactls" to "Dactyls" - although I have no "printed proof" of this spelling, I can't imagine why they wouldn't be using the correct spelling of the root they are making a joke about.  I may return and add a bit more info about the show in time (other games, occasional guest panelists, locations outside of Boston, new amusing names for the house bands, etc.) human 23:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dactyls

message: I really want to dig into this article and rewrite it, make it more "up to date" (describe the move from two 30 minute shows/week to one one hour show, mention the ever-changing musical acts, etc.), but I fear there is no way to do so without it being original research.  I will have to search the web (at least) for article about the show.  otherwise, the only sources we have are the show's website and the OR of being a listener.
Surely the show is notable, the hard part is making that obvious in the article (besides it's being syndicated by NPR), and figuring out a way to describe it better using references. human 19:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be aware that people directly involved with the show really should not edit the article about the show -- That is the weird Wikipedia way!  Whatever suggestions y'all have for improving the article, you might want to put here on the talk page...
-69.87.203.39 (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One thing that should be added are the other panelists who appear with varying regularity.  I find it odd that the saysyou.net website never mentions them - that Murray guy is on a lot, and once in a while they have Al Dershowitz (?) on. Huw Powell (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost three years later... the Says You! website is awful.  So many guest panelists and panelists who were around for ages are not mentioned, the website seems to be frozen in 1999. Huw Powell (talk) 03:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I swear, eighteen seconds later, I can now see more than the original six at the "who's who" page!  Excellent! Huw Powell (talk) 03:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Thank you very much for telling us that. I've removed that sentence. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thank you indeed. Huw Powell (talk) 19:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References and Updating

message: If it "is not an NPR program" (second sentence) why is there a "from NPR" in the logo? This should be clarified. -- 76.204.101.11 (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I've clarified that, based on the show's website indicating that it is carried by NPR but independently produced. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPR?
Talk:Delaware Wedge

message: Seems this simple fact should be at the top of the article, but isn't! 78.146.87.48 (talk) 09:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The top of the article says it's Delaware. Tedickey (talk) 11:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: So, which state currently owns it?

message: The sentence before the last one is broken. I don't see what was meant.
In 1892, W.C. Hodgkins of the Office of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey monument and eastward extension of the Maryland-Pennsylvania border, and created the "Top of The Wedge Line."Tinus 23:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. — Eoghanacht talk 13:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear text

message: As a map geek and a local history geek with my roots in Pennsylvania, this article fascinates me. There is one thing related to this article, and boundaries in general, I'd like to see discussed. The southern boundary of PA is shown on a map as being the line of lattitude at 39 degree 43 minutes--but if you look at a topographical quadrangle map the numbered stones of the Mason-Dixon survey describe a very slightly--but obviously--zig-zag line. Likewise, I seem to recall that the 12-mile-circle arc on the topo quads is not a perfect circle but rather based on the points from an old and difficult survey. So which are the actual boundaries: the ideal lines described on paper or the lines marked by stones and pins and what not that were actually surveyed? The same applies to Wyoming and Colorado. At least one of the two is described as rectangular in their wikipedia article, but a look at the topo quads shows even more obvious deviations. PurpleChez (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundry specifics

message: How can this be a "B" class article - it does not have a single cited reference? – ukexpat (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  B Class? 

message: History, second paragraph:  "Although the Calverts publicly stated that they wanted the settlements removed, because of the foreign policy implications for the Crown, they did not personally confront them militarily."
because of the foreign policy implications for the Crown is completely separated by the commas, so it's unclear what that statement is for.  Are the implications the reason why the Calverts wanted the settlements removed, or are the implications the reason why the settlements weren't militarily confronted?  One of those commas needs to be removed.  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 20:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The text was added by  in this edit.  Perhaps he can comment. TJRC (talk) 18:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comma problem
Talk:Major League Cricket (2000)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Philidelphians. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 15#Philidelphians until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Philidelphians" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Major League Cricket (2000). (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Major League Cricket (defunct) → ? – A better disambiguator must exist than (defunct), but I am not sure what would be right because this is not my topic area and the article is a bit oddly structured. Major League Cricket (2005)? See Talk:KCTY (Kansas City) and Talk:Meta (augmented reality company). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Cricket has been notified of this discussion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

text: An example for a similar naming situation is United States Football League, United States Football League (2010) and the current United States Football League (2022) Moedk (talk) 10:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What complicates things in this case is that there was never a Major League Cricket "season".  The only event they ever successfully pulled off was the Sir Clive Lloyd Cup in 2004. 162 etc. (talk) 13:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 April 2023
Talk:Gardner McKay

message: I've rated the article stub class mainly for the lack of inline citations, but adding a  bit more content wouldn't hurt. Whyaduck 22:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: The article says McKay "wrote many plays and novels," but mentions only "Sea Marks." Can someone write up something on his other plays and novels of note - with links? Thanks.
Isoruku (talk) 18:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plays and novels?
Talk:White Oaks Secondary School

message: Re: Chris Hadfield attending the schools, there's a newspaper story entitled "White Oaks students to see alumnus fly space shuttle" here:  Kappa 00:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Seven schools rightfully claim [Chris Hadfield] as an alumnus. Before taking his OAC (Grade 13) year at MDHS in 1977, he spent four years at White Oaks Secondary School in Oakville. Percy Merry School in Milton was his first elementary school in Halton, but he also attended W.H. Morden and Montclair schools in Oakville and King George VI school in Sarnia. ..."
NASA, simply chose to pick MDHS,for his bio, probably to avoid listing so many.  --rob 02:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Northern Seven Years' War

message: Wasn't Muscovy a participant in that conflict? I found some tidbits of information about the gains of Sweden, Poland and Muscovy in this war, added them to the Treaty of Stettin article - it would be good if they were reviewed. Also, this may benefit from merger or expantion with material from Livonian War. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Muscovy

message: I have made the navial battles and exploits of Klas Horn a little bit less biased and more accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.82.169.61 (talk) 01:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some corrections 

message: Link to Belorussian article is incorrect. Thei article is about Livonian war.--90.190.139.232 (talk) 10:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Interwiki

message: The article was rated as B-class. It is actually far from it. Allow me to elaborate:
*B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. The article flamboyantly fails this criterion, with only five instances of inline citations. This alone degrades the article from B-class.
*B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It is unfortunately inaccurate in that it's confusing to read, especially in references of chronology. Time is hard to keep track of here. For instance, dates often lack year. 
*B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. The structure is not well defined, with the chronology being confusing. It has a lead, but it's short as well as unclear: "many men died".
*B4. It is free from major grammatical errors. Free from major ones, I guess, but it'd benefit from a thorough copyedit. The English language is Scandinavian-influenced at times and could flow better.
*B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. OK.
*Geschichte (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Short review

message: Hi user:Ealdgyth, i dont get the point in removing all the flags, Can you please explain? 5.179.91.122 (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flagicons
Talk:Up (Peter Gabriel album)

message: Surely Peter wasn't the only person to play instruments on this album? Does anyone have any data on this? Steven 00:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel

message: According to various internet sources, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan died in 1997, so the live performance could not have been at the 1998 VH1 music awards.  Either the performance was not live (on his part at least) or it took place before august of 1997.
:Fact fixed. --Fantailfan 21:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact Check

message: I think it would honour the artist and the album if someone added details about each song, personell, topic and so on. This album means alot to me and many of my friends, and therefore I would like to get information about the details of each track. Me myself am not capable of getting such information, therefore I hope that you others can get it. It would mean a lot to me:)
80.202.108.223 14:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information About the Songs

message: This article in Sound On Sound magazine talks about the extended effort of recording this album. Binksternet (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article about the recording process
Talk:Infinite Loop (street)

message: Should it be mentioned that MSN Virtual Earth doesn't display the buildings? Daev 00:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder why.... ;) The VE links are from a template, so I don't think it's absolutely necessary. alerante ✆ 23:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MSN Virtual Earth

message: It was a Cray X-MP, and it was in the 1980s. If you just click the specified Cray-3 link, you will see that only a single Cray-3 was ever built, and it wasn't successful.
I will go ahead and make the edits.
JohnC 02:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Cray computer anecdote is erroneous 

message: on the other side of DeAnza was occupied by Sun Microsystems 1997-2002 when it was reacquired by Apple. knoodelhed (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  20525 Mariani 

message: I know I'm not a member of Wikipedia, but I have to say that this is perhaps the most useless article and the most obvious candidate for deletion I have ever seen.  There's nothing notable about the street itself, and let's face it, the only reason this article is here at all is because it's tangentially related to Apple, and Apple is really-really-cool.  By that standard, maybe there should be an article about Apple's janitor? or the bar down the road where some of Apple's programmers knock back a few after work? or the fire hydrant in front of Apple's main building?
Or to put it another way -- why doesn't Wikipedia have an article about Woodland Drive, in Plains, Georgia?  After all, that's where Jimmy Carter lives, and he was President of the United States.
Delete this. 98.67.146.145 (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Steve Jobs was a genius. Carter was a retard peanut farmer who, after 2012, will be the 2nd worst president in the history of the US. Stop trolling or you will be dealt with.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.155.94 (talk) 23:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be deleted 

message: I am at a loss to explain why this is included: The local BJ's Restaurant & Brewery, just off campus, is often jokingly referred to as "IL 7". Unneccesary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anon2468 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: BJ's Restaurant & Brewery
Talk:Murder by Decree

message: Something about the the bulk of the article seems like it may be a copyright violation... it's just worded strangely, especially the interview part and the section that ends with "Murder by Decree" = promotional speak. Victrix 00:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright?

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs-infobox" tag