Talk:Huma Abedin

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Huma Abedin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121209033722/http://www.adl.org/PresRele/DiRaB_41/6356_41.htm to http://www.adl.org/PresRele/DiRaB_41/6356_41.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207071155/http://www.grassley.senate.gov/about/upload/Grassley-Letter0001.pdf to http://www.grassley.senate.gov/about/upload/Grassley-Letter0001.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Page Six is indirectly backed by the fact that they cancelled the required court proceedings.2601:447:4101:41F9:2996:B16:1014:3501 (talk) 20:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter what you think it's "backed by," anonymous sources in a gossip column are never acceptable sources in Wikipedia. WP:RS and WP:BLP are not negotiable. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

text: POTUS has the authority to marry people. Governors, mayors, also do. Even after they leave office. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Divorce Was Cancelled

message: Really think this article should be POV checked. Lot of partisan conservative leaning content. A lot. Strong perception these edits are not npov. Lot of effort on specific content that favors a specific political leaning. Tried to tag but tag was arbitrarily removed 0pen$0urce (talk) 04:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You last edited this article in 2016. Please identify specific issues with the article, specific content that you think is biased. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

text: You mentioned tagging the article, so I looked in your edit history and saw that you tagged it in June 2016. So I wonder what issues you are talking about, because the article has changed in the last two and a half years. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV check!?!?!?! 

message: As of the date of this Comment, the little box under her photo at top rights says she divorced Anthony Weiner in 2018, while the article says that as of 2021 their divorce is NOT finalized. C'mon, Wikipedia! If her divorce is not final, the "div." in the box needs to be changed to whatever is consistent with any other Wikipedia subject who is in the process of getting a divorce. Why would you want to say she's divorced when she's not? Are we using Wikipedia in a partisan way to help her clean up her image?2600:8804:8800:11F:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 04:07, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Article contradicts itself on her marital status

message: To describe Human Abedin's occupation as "political staffer" is inadequate since she is a New York Times best-selling author, worked as an editor of a scholarly journal for 12 years, and worked in government as Senior Advisor to a United States Senator for eight years and as Deputy Chief of Staff in the U.S. State Department for four. She was  most recently the Vice-Chair of the Forbes 30/50 International Women's Day Summit in Abu Dhabi (a consulting, organizing position, I assume.) Unlike some other notable political operatives who receive far better write ups, such as James Carville and Donna Brazile, Abedin has substantive government experience. Given all her achievements, Abedin is much more than a "political staffer," which sounds like a lowly position on a campaign. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 03:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation