Talk:Diving suit

message: as the fact that wetsuit redirecting here combined with the section in this article seem to imply. they are also used in many other watersports especially those where thier is quite a high probablility of getting wet. some people even deliberately swim in them although i belive they add a lot of effort to doing so.
how best to handle this? should other uses be handled here? should wetsuit be split out? what? Plugwash
ok i partially take that back thier are references to other uses but they are in passing right at the end of the section Plugwash 23:16, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a seperate article on Wetsuits that discusses non-diving uses. This article is on diving suits, and so discussion of other uses for wetsuits are not appropriate. - David Scarlett 10:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: wetsuits aren't just for diving

message: The "Dive skins and jeans" section needs clean-up so that, among other things, the buoyancies on the jeans agree and Wikipedia isn't accused of being sponsored by Levi Strauss. - 128.237.241.229 19:48, 8 February 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've removed all mention of the use of jeans for scuba diving. Still can't believe that was in the article for almost 2 years! David Scarlett 11:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Same reason that some divers wear boiler suits. personal protection against abrasion, stings etc. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeans 

message: Does anyone else think that the use of argox as a suit inflation gas is not notable enough to be worthy of mention? Given that argon is highly narcotic, and such a gas would be quite narcotic below about 15m (EAD of 41m) and could quite likely kill the dive if breathed below 30m (EAD 72m), it seems absurd to mention it here. That and the fact that its use is pretty much completely unheard of. See Talk:Argox (scuba) for some discussion on this gas. -- David Scarlett(Talk) 02:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argox as suit inflation gas 

message: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as  is optional.Needs more references. Almost all now cited, of the remaining, I know one is true from personal observation/ common knowledge and the others are quite plausible, just have not found refs yet. 
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for , although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Looks OK. 
The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. OK. 
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Looks OK. 
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Looks OK. 
 Looks OK. 
Just need a bit of referencing. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems good enough for B now. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class review 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Diving suit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031224205717/http://www.mediacen.navy.mil:80/pubs/allhands/jun00/pg14.htm to http://www.mediacen.navy.mil/pubs/allhands/jun00/pg14.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023063153/http://www.123scuba.com:80/c-scuba-equipment-guide-wetsuits.html to http://www.123scuba.com/c-scuba-equipment-guide-wetsuits.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Diving suit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mediacen.navy.mil/pubs/allhands/jun00/pg14.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060117160453/http://www.divinghistory.com/historyofthewetsuit.htm to http://www.divinghistory.com/historyofthewetsuit.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.123scuba.com/c-scuba-equipment-guide-wetsuits.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Esse trópico revisa classe A 186.237.238.229 (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisão de classe A