lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lophophore

message: "Groups with lophophores are called lophophorates. They were traditionally considered a monophyletic group, but it now appears they are also related to phyla such as the Mollusca and Annelida, together forming the Lophotrochozoa." REFERENCES, PLEASE! Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 12:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  evolution 

message: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/glossary/gloss7/lophophore.html
Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ====== !!! ======

message: Here comes a little explanation! I have noticed that the cited material is copyrighted. Partly literally copied here. And it isn't even mentionned that it is a citation. HMMM...
Somebody say something do something, (if it is necessary at all.) Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 12:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what did i mean by the "!!!" 

message: The pronunciation "help" for lophophore, like most all so called prounciantion "helps" is only confusing. The pronunciation for anyone who even slept half way through high school should be obvious. 
All lophophores are found in aquatic organisms might read better, lophophores are found only in aquatic organisms 
In the old view of metazoan phylogeny, the lophophorates were placed within the deuterostomia should read, were placed within the proterostomia. Chordates, included vertebrates and tunicates, and echiniderms are deuterostoms (mouth second). Brachiopods, bryozoans, and molluscs, along with annelids and arthropods are proterostomes (mouth first). 
John M 2/14/09  —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.H.McDonnell (talk • contribs) 02:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  some observations

message: Elena N. Temereva et al, The first data on the innervation of the lophophore in the rhynchonelliform brachiopod Hemithiris psittacea: what is the ground pattern of the lophophore in lophophorates?, BMC Evolutionary Biology (2017). DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1029-5  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.129.128.7 (talk) 12:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New paper
Talk:Killing Me Softly (Roberta Flack album)

message: This edit was made under the newly created account Irihana, which I reverted because the citation (to a book from 1975 listed at Amazon and GoogleBooks, but with no preview at either) included no page number or quotation. I was then reverted by another newly created account In_de_Nile who included a sentence fragment from a supposed quotation and the page number as 65. This Amazon.com product page, however, says the book has only 37 pages, so I've reverted them again, whoever they are. Dan56 (talk) 04:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ook, , so now it's page 32 in the book. What happened to page 65? And why did "In_de_Nile" cite the same book as you and then vanish?? And what happened to the word "timeless", originally included by that "editor" as being part of the quote you're claiming is in that book? Dan56 (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

text: that  is probably a vandal only account; I didn't realize that you actually needed the page number and quote, if I knew that when I made the edit originally yesterday, obviously I would've added in all the details such as page 32 and the actual quote of it being The R&B and soul album that featured the number one hit "Killing Me Softly With His Song", I have a copy of the book and you're more then welcome to borrow it, but if you live outside the UK, I will need to pay for the airfare(s). ɪrihαnα 10:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

text: are you aware that the chart reference for the Roberta Flack cover of the album's lead single on that one's page is actually referring to the Prince Purple Rain album chart performance? ɪrihαnα 10:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly falsified citation, possible return of genre warrior(s)
Talk:Dhananjoy Chatterjee

message: If Dhanajoy Chatterjee was 41 years old at the time of his execution in August 14 2004, that would mean he was born in 1963. Being born in 1965 would make him 39 years old.Aishah Bowron,15:45, 22 March 2006
:But unless I just can't see it, the article doesn't say he was 41. Those references which mention his age, e.g. Indolink, and MSNBC, say he was 39. -- Arwel (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are discrepancies between the court order available at India Kanoon website and this article, include about age. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the tone of the article is un-encyclopaedic like a case is being argued. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ----Massively edited.Winged Blades Godric  09:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies  
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Diyako, Heja helweda, Muhamed 1

message: I'm afraid this RfC has formal and substantial shortcomings that make it invalid. I suggest for the creator of the RfC to retract it for now and start afresh.
;Reasons:
*There is no evidence that this is about a single dispute. It seems to be an unconnected list of alleged incidents of questionable behaviour by three unrelated people (whose only commonality is that they are all three Kurdish?)
*For the same reason, it is unclear to me what status could possibly attach to any alleged "evidence of trying and failing to resolve this dispute", or who could possibly be in a position to "certify" it.
*As of now (23:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the trobble. The time of properly formatted rfc (real rfc) should be counted. As there was no activity prior. Sorry I just didnt file an RfC for ages. --Cool CatTalk|@ 09:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a formally valid RfC
Talk:Walther Sommerlath

message: It is true WS was a member of the Nazi party, but referring him as an active Nazi is not correct. He worked for the Swedish steel group Uddeholm, and after the war he worked for Uddeholm in its office in Brazil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.63.146.199 (talk • contribs) 
*Hello Mr Anonymous Editor. If someone is a member of the Nazi-party  (joined as early as 1934 and remained a member of the party during the war), I think it is correct to call that person a Nazi. Bronk 22/3 2006.
:PS. The swedish wikipedia article on WS is very well sourced on this issue.
While WS was a member of the Nazi party, as proved by his marriage to a Brazilian, he did not agree with the party on the issues of nationalism or racial superiority.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.241.192 (talk • contribs) 
:Really? So did Hitler not believe his own Nazi principles because he'd worked with Jews and allied with Japan? Or were the Nazis just full of it? Or is it that there's no incompatibility between the Nazi beliefs and Sommerlath's marriage to that Brazilian lady (white like him, btw). So many questions... SamEV (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing written about that he did not agree on the party's issues on nationalism or racial superiority. If you have such information please come forward as I believe the King and Queen of Sweden desperatly want the world to know such facts. The only thing we have is that he became member very early though most of his countrymen in Brazil didn't. He moved to Germany just before the war. He overtook a factory from someone who vanished. We don't know anything about the factory. Queen Silvia surely knows but wont tell us. Then he fled back to Brazil after the war. He was a nazi for sure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.199.24 (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sommerlath "bought" in April 1939 the company in Kreuzberg of Efim Wechsler (1883-1962), who fled to Brazil. Silvia said her father's company made toys and hair dryers; in fact, it produced war material. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nazi???

message: So did most Germans in Germany. 
A rather nonsensical sentence, not offering any figures, which incorrectly implies that the contrary was the case in the mother country, Germany, where in fact only a minority (peaking 8 million in 1945, i.e. 10% of the total population) were members of the Nazi party.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.193.95.127 (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most Germans in Brazil chose not to be members in the party"
Talk:Doppler broadening

message: I just corrected the formula for the FWHM of the broadened profile, which was wrong by a factor of \sqrt(2).
wrong (old) formula: \Delta f_{\text{FWHM}} = \sqrt{\frac{8kT\ln 2}{mc^2}}f_{0}
new formula: \Delta f_{\text{FWHM}} = 2\sqrt{\frac{2kT\ln 2}{mc^2}}f_{0}  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loetknecht (talk • contribs) 17:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The two expressions you have written here are equal to each other. The new equation in the article is equal to the old equation. PAR (talk) 09:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction

message: This article should be merged with "Doppler Profile"
I've put the notice on the frontpage. --ScienceApologist 23:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I think it would be good to include a visualization of a broadened spectral line profile. I had uploaded one previously, but it has since been removed. Here is a link to my figure: . If there are improvements that can be made to it before putting it on this page I am happy to address those! Planetphysicsguy (talk) 20:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I still do not see any added value in this figure. Something had a certain width and then that something became wider. This is what the "broadening" word means. For somebody not familiar at all with the notion of spectral line, this figure says nothing; for those familiar with the notion, it is trivial. Furthermore, the initial lineshape is already noticeably broad, so you cannot call it "unbroadened" (it isn't a correct English word, BTW). So what is the source of that initial broadening? It would be logical to assume it is the natural width, but then the lineshape should be Lorentzian, while it looks like a Gaussian. Do you want to talk about instrumental broadening? Then the discussion becomes too technical. Finally, "Doppler" is a proper name, so it should be capitalized in any context. Evgeny (talk) 09:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a figure
Talk:English cricket team in India in 2005–06

message: Started putting the scorecards into their proper structure (did this by copy and pasting from another Test series' scorecard so if there are errors, apologies) and am going to start doing the other two Tests but would be glad if someone else could do the write-up. Especially to include that apparently the reason England came out so pumped up in the final day is that Hoggard played them Ring of Fire from his iPod during lunch :D Tony2Times 16:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Apologies for the edit war. I will be coming back and rewriting the article to be more neutral, but the article appears to be incomplete if the edits involved were to be removed. Another thing for my to-do list, I suppose. Cassie Schebel, almost a savant. <3 (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war
Talk:Soul Calibur III: Arcade Edition

message: I do not mean for anyone to take offense, but is there anything on this page that isn't rumours? 
If Hiroaki Yotoriyama really confirmed all of that stuff, could you please support it, with some proof. Thanks. --Cloak' 16:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there has been no proof put forward, I will put up a deletion notice. Of course, I will take it away if there is proof given.--Cloak' 15:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This should really be at the Soul Calibur III article. There is enough info for its inclusion there and not a seperate page. Thunderbrand 18:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. If Soul Edge Version II/Soul Blade didn't have a page of its own, I don't see the point of doing one for only 3 new chars and 1 new mode. (Johnny Master 06:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody answer? I'm feeling forced to split Version II/Soul Blade from the Soul Edge's article, even if its not really needed. Anyone objects? (Johnny Master 07:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be merged with the Soul Calibur III article.  I fully support that.--Cloak' 15:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So we are 3-0 to merge this one. I'll wait 24 hours, if there's no objetions, I'll take care of merging both articles. Sounds good? (Johnny Master 07:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK to me. Thunderbrand 23:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Geri Halliwell/to do

message: The article is in dire need of attention. Nowhere does it touch upon Halliwell's musical-sound or her style and influence, which is a part of featured articles such as Céline Dion and Kylie Minogue. It would also be interesting if her breast cancer awareness was also included in the article. Halliwell has done a lot in a mere ten years but it doesn't seem like anyone has been interested enough to expand past her Spice Girls days. —Eternal Equinox | talk 16:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Carlos Boozer

message: Deleted the "Sporting Network" link due to it no longer working. Stanfunky 10:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I assume that the dates on the retrievals that say they are from July 2008 (future) should be July 2007?SpellcheckW7 (talk) 03:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was just graffiti. Thanks for fixing it.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 11:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: "Together, they have one child[2] and had twins the summer of 2007."  This is kind of confusing. Is there any reason not to change it to "Together they have three children" or something like that?
Chrieraux (talk) 04:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: An IP editor has been changing Boozer's nationality to German. While Boozer was born in Germany, he was born in an American military base, and he definitely holds American citizenship. (Remember that he has represented the US in international competition several times.)
He might be a dual citizen of the US and Germany, but we'll need to see a source. Zagalejo^^^ 23:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: German nationality?

message: Boozer's agent has been at FAC for a while with little commentary.  See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rob Pelinka/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  14:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rob Pelinka FAC

message: 1) http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nba/news/story?id=5361792  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eaglesfanhoping4sb (talk • contribs) 23:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Please stop changing it. Yes, Boozer is going to sign with Chicago, but it's not official until he signs, which hopefully will happen tomorrow. July 8 is the earliest date. We're dealing with the same thing at the LeBron James article. Enigmamsg 01:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Boozer is still a free agent

message: He's a virgin but has three children?  Or does that actually make him a born-again virgin?  I can't quite figure this out.RadioKAOS (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure it's just vandalism. I've removed it. Zagalejo^^^ 00:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradict template in biography section
Talk:Lists of amusement parks

message: Sections E-H I-M N-S T-Z should be de-wikified until such time as amusement parks can be added that fit in these categories.
George100 16:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: E-Z

message: Out of curiosity, is there someone (or some group) currently working on filling in the E-Z pages of this list? Stratosphere 03:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on the List? 

message: I don't really know how to edit something, still trying to get used to Wikipedia, but could someone possibly list the 'Holiday Park' as one ot the German Parks, please? http://holidaypark.de/index.php?L=1
Thanks. Carocat 14:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: A-B
C-D 
E-H
I-M
N-S
T-Z
This list was not clear, and the template is great. But moved this list here for future use if necessary.--Tinned Elk 18:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put template on page, removed this list 

message: As the article is now in effect "List of lists of amusement parks", perhaps it should be renamed accordingly?
(No, this is not an April 1 prank.) -- Korax1214 (talk) 03:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name looking rather silly 

message: Is there a list of largest parks (by size))? I didn't find it. Though there is a list where they are ranked by attendace. 82.141.119.79 (talk) 20:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest parks?
Talk:Archibald Roane

message: It differs from the one on the grave present on Find-A-Grave. Lincher 16:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that his monument was added several decades after his death.  Bms4880 (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Rectification (geometry)

message: The pictures here seem pretty useless, without some sort of explanation of how the 2-D representations were generated.  Furthermore, the representations are of different types - the hypercube representation should parallel the others.  I propose to just remove the pictures all together.  Dshin 20:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, images not that useful now. Tom Ruen 09:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not agreed, images help understand. Maksim-e 20:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the correction on rectified 5-cells - and yes - better pictures have been added since March 2006! Tom Ruen 00:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 4 dimensions 

message: I think it would be nice if there was a section on rectification of curves in the plane. The Wikipedia page on Arc length has a pretty picture of the rectification of a curve. Not everything has to be 3 or 4 dimensional, and a section on lower dimension rectifications might be nice. 73.14.72.177 (talk) 23:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a completely unrelated sense of "rectification" and should not be in the same article.  However, it makes sense to add a link to the other sense of "rectification", I'll do that now. --platypeanArchcow (talk) 23:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In lower dimensions
Talk:Melon

message: Note: Do not write crap in this space (like the below stuff).  Make a numbered section, as the items below are, or append onto an existing section.  Add new sections at the bottom only.  Do not use ambiguous/omnibiguous titles (like 'Question' or 'Reset') because those words have nothing to do with Melons or the article; half the sections started out as questions anyway.   The titles cannot be changed later, so we're stuck with the bad ones.  Also, any change you made, follow it with quadruple ~ so this will turn into your username and date.  Don't delete anything, as it is all important history of this page. OsamaBinLogin (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Template talk:Nordic Council

message: Tasc, I have restored the prior hierarchical arrangement which shows the soverign member states in a larger font in the first line and, in a smaller font size below them, the associate insular members that have home rule and separate associate memberships in the Council. Do not change format without providing a reasonable justification on this talk page. Thanks you for your enrhusiasm. // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 16:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i didn't change font size or anything. I've only moved associate members title in line with the states name. I don't see any reasons for having such huge template for only 8 links. --tasc 17:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not keep changing font size or moving sub-captions. What you can do to help is to perhaps decrease the width of the box to make it more compact. // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 17:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  why not? this template is bigger than any other. Just have a look at denmark for example. It's just ridiculous how the bottom of the article looks like. --tasc 17:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ridiculous or not, that's your personal preference. My reasoning is that it is helpful to distinguish visually (i.e. with reduced font size) between soveregin member states and associate members. // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 17:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is different! 100 vs 90%. What was before just impossible to read! And there is subtitle associate member. What else is needed? --tasc 17:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's better now with the width reduced. But the caption is slightly offset towards the left, because of the flag. If you can fix this, that would be an improvement, too. Thanks. // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 17:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can, but i will not. You're seem advanced enough user to figure out how to change such simplest thing. bye. --tasc 17:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, nobody can force you to help out or contribute, Tasc. Thanks for that help you did provide by adjusting the width, that was a positive contribution. Goodbye for now. // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 17:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I didn't mean only for now. :\ --tasc 17:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Aww, please don't get mad or sad now. Read this and this. =) // Big Adamsky  • BA's talk page 17:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hierarchical order 

message: Howdy folks. I have posted a comment on overlapping templates on Template talk:Nordic Countries. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 14:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Template:Nordic Countries]] and [[:Template:Nordic Council]] 

message: has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|Nordic Council}}
Talk:Lynne Roberts

message: It is different from the one on her grave at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 16:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how reliable this page is, but it claims her birth year was changed to 1919 in studio publicity to avoid age controversies. BryanG(talk) 20:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:California State Route 70

message: 3/30 70  from 395 is open 64.113.109.152 (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia isn't designed to list current road conditions and/or closures. The state DOT's have websites for that, and probably better they remain the single point of contact for such information. Specifically for CA-70 it would be https://roads.dot.ca.gov/ Dave (talk) 05:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  395 Reno to 70 is open?
Talk:List of years in Zimbabwe

message: I started this timeline in a similar fashion as the Timeline of South African history. I am not sure about the sub-divisions but if anyone who can come up with something better please feel free to discuss here --Jcw69 17:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree plus that's an excellent suggestion Eenoowendo (talk) 21:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments