lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Asclepias tuberosa

message: For some reason there was a recent change suggesting that this plant does in fact have milky stems.  Perhaps this is because of a hybridization or some other cause?  I think the confusion is that it is a member of the milkweed family, so the assumption is made that it has milk.
* Milky:  Asclepias tuberosa 'Hello Yellow'
* Not Milky:    
I also have some botony books that list this as "Not Milky", but since they are in print, I can't show a link.  Please note the "Hello Yellow" cultivar is supposed to be milky, but not the native plant.  See here and here. There are only a few references to it being milky and those could be considered an error by assuming it was milky due to the name or hybridization. — Ram-Man (comment) (talk) 01:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have yet to see evidence of any hybrids of Asclepias being sold anywhere, other than exaltata (Poke milkweed) that has syriaca genes in it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.192.184 (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

message: This species is listed at the Orange-root disambiguation page and somebody has rightfully questioned this as a common name for this plant since it is not listed in the article itself. Need source of some kind. Jason Quinn (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Orange root"? 

message: Taxonomic rank is always indicated in botanical names; unlike in zoology there are several infraspecific ranks (subspecies, variety, forma). 160.111.254.17 (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic rank 
Talk:23rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment

message: It seems that this page only covers the three year regiment, yet one of the sources has the 3 month regiment as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cromdog (talk • contribs) 20:09, 14 April 2008, 
:The three month regiment is discussed in the first two paragraphs of the article. Wild Wolf (talk) 22:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 month and 3 year
Talk:Paramour rights

message: Here's a whole bunch of stuff from the Reparations for Slavery article that wasn't appropriate for that article, but should probably be merged into this article and wikified. MisterPhyrePhox 21:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  From [[Reparations for slavery|Reparations for Slavery]] 

message: I have moved the para content to sexual slavery, it has its own section now. Also moved cat. As per the white slavery merger debate its unlikely that paramour rights has enough content for an article beyond para length. The Sexual slavery article also provides more content for this practice.--SasiSasi (talk) 20:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to sexual slavery
Talk:American Airlines Flight 320

message: Much of the probable cause is taken word-for-word directly from the Civil Aeronautics Board's Aircraft Accident Report on Flight 320. This is a U.S. Government work and is therefore in the public domain.
:Actually, it was a mixture of word-for-word and paraphrasing, which is not a proper way to do it.  Therefore, I changed it to nothing but an accurate and complete quoting of the PROBABLE CAUSE (it is in caps in the report), and then improved the link to the report so that one click gets the downloaded PDF CAB Accident Report file.  It looks different than the usual link in Wiki, but what the hell, it works! 66.81.53.26 (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My guess is that the five paragraphs that start with a quote mark are actual quotes from the NYT source. If that's the case, this needs to be formatted correctly, perhaps as a block quote, or better yet paraphrased with a proper reference. If not, those stray unclosed quote marks should be removed. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT quote? 

message: It's not clear what is intended by: affected the opening various equipment. catslash (talk) 00:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a super fast response, but... thank you for your feedback.  I looked at the source to see what I was trying to write at the time and have reworded that.  Sorry I didn't notice your comment earlier.  RecycledPixels (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Mangled sentence

message: Hi! About this edit, I linked the accident report in the external links specifically to highlight the final report. I am aware that the report is cited in the list of references, but having to wade through a sea of references will turn off a lot of casual readers (especially readers who don't know how to use CTRL+F). The final accident report is the most important external link there is for a given aviation accident, and in my opinion it needs to be linked prominently.
What can be done, however, is make the citation just a page number, and under references (for a general list of books rather than the list of inline cites), include the full citation of the accident report. See Air_France_Flight_447#Works_cited and Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123#Bibliography which show the final accident report prominently as a list of cited references.
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking the final accident report
Talk:Grady McWhiney

message: This is a weak bio because it seems to reflect bias against McWhiney with unreferenced negative assertions about his work. I'm only going to attempt to improve the format for now and leave the referencing to others, but may tone down or eliminate the most gratuitous ones.  If this strikes anyone as "weasel wording" it will be an attempt at bettering what is there, at least.  Rlquall 19:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agree weak - for ignores his racism as his fellow country club attendees could attest about his words n private - as if they would disclose  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.191.14 (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Weak article

message: "These are words easily applied to one of the South's most prominent scholars, Grady McWhiney. For over three decades his writings have been discussed and debated but never disregarded." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vanguard587 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the quotation to the end in order to reduce that problem. -Will Beback · † · 00:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The beginning paragraph sounds like an ad campaign

message: McWhiney did not originate the Celtic Thesis; it is one of several theses in W. J. Cash: The Mind of the South  (1941), and Cash does not claim to be original. (He is using it to debunk the Cavalier Thesis, then popular.) I have no real doubt it was one of the bases of "One Southron can beat ten Yankees", vintage 1861. I have less doubt that McWhiney was not publishing when he was 13. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Celtic Thesis
Talk:Norman Jolly

message: Cricinfo lists Jolly as English  despite his Australian places of birth and death, so I have followed suit. Loganberry (Talk) 01:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that more info has been added and references (such as the Australian Dictionary of Biography) provided, it seems pretty clear that he should in fact not be listed as English, so I've overridden Cricinfo here as the other sources make it pretty clear that he was an Aussie. Loganberry (Talk) 23:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Siege of Berat (1455)

message: Information about Kingdom of Naples as one of belligerents should be added to infobox.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belligerents 

message: I noticed that the article is inconsistent regarding the information it gives about the battle that happened after the Ottoman relief force arrived. In the fifth paragraph, it states Skanderberg returned towards the end of the battle and repulsed the Ottoman forces: When Skanderbeg returned, however, the Ottoman relief force was repulsed however in the last paragraph it states that Skanderberg wasn't present in the battle at all and the Albanian army was beaten Skanderbeg himself was not at the battle... Upon hearing the news, he rushed back, but by the time of his arrival the battle was already over... The results at Berat were disastrous and badly crippled the Albanian resistance for a time. In my edit I mostly left those parts alone to not risk editing out a correct piece of information, but I think it needs to be addressed. The sources I was able to find(from my last edit) are more aligned with the second narrative, however there might be others that I might have missed  Cannotpick (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal inconsistency
Talk:Mary Burns

message: *I closed the AfD as No Consensus (rather than Keep) because there didn't seem to be much support for the current state of the article.  It clearly needs some work but there is no consensus for deletion either.  Eluchil404 (talk) 01:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. --Lquilter (talk) 17:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: Mary Burn is described as Friedrich Engels' wife in the article. However in the larger article on Engels they are described as never marrying as Engels did not approve of the institution of marriage. I haven't edited the description as I do not know enough about their relationship to determine what word is best used to describe Mary's relation to Engels. Oska 12:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Wife"

message: The article says that Mary Ellen, the niece, was born in 1859, meaning she was only 4 when Mary Burns died? It seems 1844 or so might be a better year of her birth, given the certainty that a portion of her duties involved sexual services to Engels. Face it, he was a horn dog!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.91.54.4 (talk) 00:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: hi 50.86.124.162 (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary Ellen 

message: The current text (July 21, 2021) says there is no known image of Mary Burns. The photo that accompanies the article is identified on other websites as a photo her nice Mary Ellen "Pumps" Burns, and should be so identified.
:I don't think this photo should be used as it is not of the subject of the article and is therefore misleading...--Jack Upland (talk) 22:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Frances Clayton

message: This article includes two confusing or illogical sentences.
:During this battle Clalin was wounded, but was not discovered because of her injury. 
Does "not discovered" mean "left unfound on the battlefield" or "not recognized as female"? Either way, the sentence should be rewritten to clarify.
:Clalin did fix the mistakes, but this error creates doubts about what really happened. 
What mistakes? what error? Anomalocaris (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing or illogical sentences 

message: My correction of June 14, 2011, was removing vandalism of 75.142.104.67.  He inserted Cakes, Hamsters and Dolphins in the text.  I put the wrong IP number in my note.  Sorry. Mike Nassau (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in note 
Talk:Lizzie Compton

message: http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/halwom.html
Not sure if this would count as a source, but I came across it and thought it might apply. if it does meet wiki source standards then please add to main page. - TiaF 98.17.236.24 (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've been working on a rewrite for this article, found in my sandbox. In there, I've removed the references temporarily, but will add them soon. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
The reason I've removed the references was that the reference style in this version is all over the place, and quite inconsistent. Should I keep the old references, or just redo it completely as well?
In addition, there are also two unused references, the first of which is unused and the second of which has a 404 for the related page. I've deleted it in my version, but if people think they should be kept, please let me know.
Caerwi (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite and references style
Talk:Florena Budwin

message: Recommend deleting "When General William Tecumseh Sherman began his march through Georgia, Florena and many other prisoners were transferred to the" through "Florena died on January 25, 1865, a little over a month before the prison at Florence was closed and the prisoners were sent to North Carolina where they were paroled to the North. She was 20 years old." because it's more related to Civil War prisons, is unsourced, and reads more like a book than an encyclopedia article.
I'll proceed in a day if I see no objections.  Thanks C A W (talk) 13:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary
Talk:Severinus of Noricum

message: Asturis, like Comagenis (Kastell Comagena) and Batavis (Passau). Those Roman towns seem to have been named after auxiliary army units garrisoning Noricum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 17:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astura or Asturis? Both? 
Talk:Patrick Kelly (Civil War)

message: So I'm getting into civil war reenacting, and I'm planning on joining Kelly's Irish brigade. It is actually a group of Irish-Americans who lived around St. Louis and were a part of the U.S. army. When the civil war broke out, they decided to take the side of their state, and they left the army. They actually kept their blue uniforms, so they were confederate soldiers wearing navy blue uniforms. Their "leader" was Patrick Kelly. Someone needs to fix this article, and since I just joined Wiki, I think someone else should.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godsmuzicbox (talk • contribs) 19:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't Kelly a confederate? 
Talk:Claire Wolfe

message: Does anyone know how to send a message to Claire Wolfe? Her forum seems to be down. Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 10:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message 

message: If Claire Wolfe IS a guy posing as a woman I'd be pretty annoyed.  So I'd love to see ref'd info on pseudonyms etc. So let's get some references in this article since right now per WP:BLP just about all the info could be deleted so that any real Claire Wolfe's out there don't sue wikipedia :-) . Carol Moore 18:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that clarification.  There has been considerable discussion about this.  One popular supposition was that it was a pen name for Bill St Clair. Trasel (talk) 02:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have noted I took it out a couple weeks ago because there wasn't a WP:RS questioning whether or not Claire was a woman or a pseudonym. (Plus my roommate remembered hearing her speak in 1998.) But it would be nice if someone could reference the factoids before someone comes along and deletes them all. I just don't have time. If you can't deal with formatting references, put them up in parenthesis and I'll format them real quick. Carol Moore 12:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

text: We need more than just one ref. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References per [[WP:BLP]]
Talk:CSS Tallahassee

message: The article states that the Tallahassee was originally built to the designs of a Captain RN for the London, Chatham and Dover Railway (LC&DR), ostensibly for the China opium trade.
Some confusion here. The LC&DR had a fine shipping department, with some excellent (and some very innovative) ships - see Rixon Bucknall, Boat Trains and Channel Packets. But those ships never went beyond passenger and cargo service across the English Channel. The LC&DR may have had some aggressive and buccaneering policies, but it never contemplated the China opium trade!  Robert upton 18:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the Atalanta (seen here) the same ship as the one in this article? 15:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the Tallahassee 

message: The article states that the James Funk was taken over as a tender to the Tallahassee.  Commander Wood's report states that it was burned.  Jhm5th (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilot boat "James Funk" 

message: I changed 'victims to prizes' because 1. That was generally the preferred terminology for naval captures and victories and 2. Victims sounds like its vilifying the ship when it was following orders during an armed conflict.  I think someone could potentially see it as biased, so I changed it.DaltonCastle (talk) 06:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Victims to Prizes
Talk:Quodvultdeus

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:CSS Jackson

message: Despite the redirect, CSS Jackson and CSS Stonewall Jackson were two different ships. I will prepare an article about the latter when I get around to it, unless someone beats me to it. PKKloeppel (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did. dawkeye (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not CSS Stonewall Jackson
Talk:Southern bread riots

message: This sentence (under "Richmond bread riots") links to a British statute from 1714, not the one the mayor would have read to a crowd in Virginia in 1863. Anyone know the correct referent here? Was there a Virginia Riot Act? Did it date from colonial law? -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 19:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: From the first paragraph of that article:  "Acts similar to the Riot Act passed into the laws of British colonies in Australia, Canada, and America, some of which remain today."  There is more detail under the section Subsequent history of the Riot Act in the UK and colonies.  82.18.16.235 (talk) 06:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The mayor read the [[Riot Act]]" 

message: With-out citation, the Economist (https://www.economist.com/1843/2022/05/23/politicians-have-long-told-the-poor-that-theyre-not-doing-poverty-right) says that J. Davis " flipped open his pocket watch and told a starving crowd (women, again) that they had five minutes to go back home."  This is different from giving out all the money he had.  Does any-one have good sources for what actually happened? Kdammers (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DAvis at RIchmond
Talk:11th Maine Infantry Regiment

message: Assessed as Start class.  Main content of article is just effectively just a list of movements/engagements with no discussion. Zawed (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Milhist assessment
Talk:2nd Maine Infantry Regiment

message: Why was this unit disbanded before the end of the war? And why is it, as the article puts it, that "survivors who had enlisted for three, rather than two, years were transferred to the 20th Maine Volunteer Infantry Regiment under protest."? (The reference on that line goes nowhere.) I came here looking to fill a similar hole in another source, which reported the same grudging integration into the 20th and refers to "the rebellious 2nd Maine". However, like this article, it stops short of actually explaining any of this. Could someone who knows the answer add that information to the article? Laodah 22:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: A hole in the narrative
Talk:Marcellinus of Carthage

message: I saw this article a year ago, and it had citations.  They were written out as references.  Someone, seeing that they weren't stupid footnotes, removed them.  That's hardly the same thing as not citing sources.  (I think the sources were even nihil obstat with imprimatur or standard reference works.)  Too bad dummies have vandalized the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.243.104.154 (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:11th Vermont Infantry Regiment

message: Here is an excellent source of material on every Vermont Civil War unit, including the 11th Vermont:
|http://vermontcivilwar.org/units/11/.
Some interested editor should make use of this website to improve this and other Vermont Civil War unit histories. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent source
Talk:17th Vermont Infantry Regiment

message: This was on the page, but it does not fit with the service time of the regiment. The battle seems to indicate he was in one of the regiments that made up the 1st Vermont Brigade. Does anyone have anymore information? I pasted it here so that it wouldn't be lost. Hhfjbaker (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Could not happen
Talk:Josephine Bakhita

message: Das könnte man noch erwähnen, , "im Kloster der Canossianerinnen in Schio. Die hl. Sr. Giuseppina Bakhita ruht in einem Glasschrein unter dem Altar."
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.67.145 (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.67.145 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.68.85 (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wo sie begraben liegt
Talk:Atlantic jackknife clam

message: Different sources give different taxonomy listings for Ensis directus:
*Family Pharidae
*Family Solenidae
*Family Cultellidae
Anyone have more information? -- Scientizzle 20:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: WORMS has this species as Ensis leei M. Huber, 2015.
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=876640 77.8.77.236 (talk) 10:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy
Talk:Live at the Fillmore East, March 7, 1970: It's About That Time

message: The title has the date in parentheses.
Please check your copy of the CD or check amazon.com 
Administrator, how can we wikify this problem? Dogru144 01:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in title of this article

message: In 1970, soon after a series of concerts at the Fillmore East, Columbia released Miles Davis at Fillmore: Live at the Fillmore East. That album had two keyboardists: Keith Jarrett and Chick Corea.
The album in this article only has Corea; also Wayne Shorter was still saxophonist.  In Miles Davis at Fillmore: Live at the Fillmore East Steve Grossman has replaced Shorter. This latter recording was from June, 1970. Dogru144 01:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible confusion between this album and album of similar title
Talk:Landstuhl

message: The following phrase is biased:
:"The Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, a U.S. Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) post, is often the first stop for American casualties leaving the ongoing occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan."
The term occupation should be replaced with conflict which avoids political commentary for or against the subject military actions.
—Jph2 01:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (POV) 

message: Some popular Person are born in Landstuhl.
1.Dr.Jeferey Taubenberger
2.Geordi La Forge  
(fictive Person from STAR TREK NEXT GENERATION)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.206.6 (talk) 11:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and Balys "Billy" Bieliausas, entrepreneur/venture capitalist .''
since a Google search fails to hint at any basis for the contemplated bio article. --Jerzy•t 11:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Born there) 
Talk:Hermias (apologist)

message: From "Tyrants," under "Atarneus," the link to "Hermias" takes us to a Christian apologist not to a government leader. Was this intentional? The article doesn't seem to support that. Hermias does sound right for a Christian apologist. I'm not familiar enough with the Greek Tyrants to know whether Hermias is ALSO the name of a BCE Tyrant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.92.154.85 (talk • contribs) 
:You're right, the link to this page was in error.  I've straightened out the links and created Hermias (disambiguation).  Wareh 21:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Name–value pair

message: It turns out that attribute-value pairs are quite useful in theorising about programming languages as well as designing practical systems. See "A semantics of multiple inheritance", Luca Cardelli, Information and Computation, 76(2/3): 138-164, February 1988, available here as PDF. Should we mention this in the article? Cheers, CWC(talk) 01:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A/V pairs in theory of PLs