lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shootfighting

message: bart vale created shootfighting ?? WTF ..he did coin the term but the old UWF team of sotoro sayama,fujiwara,suzuki,funaki etc are credited with shootfighting's creation,they just called it "stiff style"/shooting etc. ............
: Shootfighting is a REGISTERED TRADEMARK to Bart vale (reference). The history of shootfighting started when Bart Vale registered the term, but it's roots are based on shoot wrestling. The UWF team is credited with the creation of shoot wrestling(which is the IDENTICAL to "shooting style"), and shootfighting is derived from shootwrestling. It was my mistake not to include clear links to shootwrestling, but I added them now, so there is no need to repeat the history of shootwrestling here. I suggest you read this article on Japanese professional wrestling to clarify that they aren't the same thing.  ---Marcus- 23:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Accoring to one source, the UWF team created the style called shootwrestling in English(Reference). If you've got any sources saying that it's called shootfighting, please share them (sources which aren't affiliated with the International Shootfighting Association, since this is clearly biased). It is not my intention of discrediting the history of this particular style of fighting, but as i've said earlier, it is already listed in the history of shootwrestling, and there is no need to repeat it when you can use a link.  ---Marcus- 01:27, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Found another source saying that the UWF style is referred to as shoot wrestling: [Source] ---Marcus- 01:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: The source you have used (Link) does not state that the style used in Japan is referred to as shootfighting.   ---Marcus- 01:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I think i've found the source of your text(Link). Notice how it differs from the other sources, which never state that the UWF style is referred to as shootfighting.  ---Marcus- 01:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: After careful scrutiny of the matter, i've noticed that the mixed martial arts competitions were referred to as shootfighting before Bart Vale registered it as his trademark, but that term is only used colloquially nowadays. I've incorporated this information into the article. ---Marcus- 22:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Again, very good rewrite! --Janto 11:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Matchmaker.com

message: This IP made a great update to the article, but did not provide any references. Unfortunately, he/she also includes some counter-references ("contrary to popular belief"). Unfortunately, without references to the former, I think we would be inclined to believe the latter. I'm going to trim out some of the unsubstanciated bits and hope that they come back with some references. (I work for Matchmaker's parent company, Lycos, but I'm afraid that I don't have access to any internal documentation describing the pre-aquisition, neither would that documentation be acceptable as source material for Wikipedia.) JRP 18:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by 129.55.200.20
Talk:Capitals of ancient Rome

message: Although I've called my proposal a "merge," basically I suggest this article be replaced entirely with a redirect to Roman Empire.  This article attempts a three-paragraph summary of 1000 years of history.  All of the facts in this article are already in the Roman Empire article, along with far more context (and correct spelling).  --Russ Blau (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

message: As the person who requested that this article be created, I feel like I should input my two cents' worth. What I had wanted to get from this article (as I called it, "Capitals of the Roman Empire") was a list of the capitals used by the Roman Emperors. An example: 
Ravenna (date it became the effective capital of the Western Emperors - date the capital was moved to another city): --Some history of the actions of the Emperors while in Ravenna, why they moved there, why they eventually left from there, etc.--
I certainly didn't want this to be a less informative version of the Roman Empire page. I disagree with the idea that this article should become a simple redirect to the Roman Empire page, but I think that this article should look completely different by the time we're done with it. --Ro4444 (talk) 10:00, 24 January 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: =
Talk:The Entertainer (retailer)

message: The level of detail is more than is justified, and much of it is apparently original research.  Please rework the content according to the Wikipedia manual of style, specifically, making it more neutral in tone.  Thanks - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 19:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All the information is in this article is factual, and informative. There does not appear to be anything particulary promotional. I would be grateful if you could expand on what you mean.172.143.52.68 00:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement?
Talk:Constructive empiricism

message: "A theory is semantically literal if and only if the language of the theory cannot be reinterpreted in non-theoretical terms without some change in meaning." - Can the author of this article be more precise? I had a hard time understanding the above sentence. It means if we interpret a theory in observational terms, then we will change the meaning of terms, i.e. that it is impossible for a theoretical term to become an observational one without change in meaning- right? Who says the contray? 
that thanks
---I agree that as originally written it didn't make much sense; I've fixed it. (FYI I wasn't the original writer.)  --BJM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.2.210 (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Quadell

message: With all the AOL trolling, I suggest semi-protecting the voting page.  Who knows when this will end.  --King of All the Franks 06:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, NSLE.  --King of All the Franks 06:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: This is wholly inappropriate. That prevents very new users from participating, when they are allowed to. It is for the 'crats to filter out meats/socks, and for everyone to use the standard editing tools and a dose of common sense to remove the vandals. I wish people wouldn't use WP:SEMI as a tool for disposing of any one they aren't familiar with. -Splashtalk 12:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If a user new enough to be blocked by semi-protection voted on this page, they would probably be disregarded as a possable sock/meat puppet anyway. Just an observation. Raven4x4x 10:50, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we semi-protect this vote? 

message: :I see Quadell has withdrawn because of the oppose votes: only eight, some of them opposing only because they'd never seen him around, but they themselves haven't been around for long. Great shame. He's exactly the type of admin who should be promoted in my view. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I highly doubt that Quadell dropped out, since the edit was made by an AOL IP. I'm going to take it off until he confirms it. -- MicahMN | μ 01:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh good, thanks for checking that. I didn't even think to look. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Glad to hear it was a hoax. I'll keep an eye on this page. --Viriditas 04:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawing? No. 

message: So does this mean I didn't make it? – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 07:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results
MediaWiki talk:Noarticletextanon

message: Could someone with admin powers sync this with the regular Noarticletext, but reflected to indicate current standards?  Something like:
Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.
* Start the  article on Wikipedia:Articles for creation or put up a request for it.
* Search for  in other articles.
* Look for  in Wiktionary, our sister dictionary project.
* Look for  in the Commons, our repository for free images, music, sound, and video.
* Look for pages linking to this page.
Could someone do that?  As it is, it is based on the short-lived format of Noarticletext that was rejected. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to simply copy MediaWiki:Noarticletext.  Most users who see this text probably just don't know about logging in.  If they click the bold "Start this article" link, they'll get MediaWiki:Nocreatetext, which explains the issue.  dbenbenn | talk 17:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sync and fix
Talk:New Year's Eve

message: Russia is listed as one of the countries where New Year's Eve is called Silvester. It is not true to the point that it is absolutely infuriating! Russian people call New Year "Novy god", and New Year's Eve "Kanun Novogo goda".
192.116.60.41 (talk) 08:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Grave Error in the "Also Called" Section 

message: REMOVE PORNOGRAPHIC VANDALISM 2601:282:F01:9C2B:544:891:600C:E985 (talk) 17:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The vandalism has been removed and the vandal has been blocked. Thanks for the notification. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 18:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 December 2018 

message: There is Goatse on the top of the page. Suggest remove :File:Newr.png. N1n384ll (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The vandalism has been removed and the vandal has been blocked. Thanks for the notification. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 18:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 December 2018 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Year's. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Interstellarity (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New Year's" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The article correctly says that the ball drop element of the New Year's Eve celebrations in New York's Times Square began in 1907; however, the location was the scene of New Year's Eve festivities from 1904 according to the "Building history" section of the One Times Square article. JezGrove (talk) 13:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York date? 

message: I just wonder why isn't indonesia included in By Region but only Malaysia has a special New Year. What would go wrong? 180.253.132.159 (talk) 04:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because no-one has written it? Feel free to propose some text, with supporting citation. Please make clear whether it is the International New Year's Eve or Islamic New Year's eve that is being discussed. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no Indonesia in By Region?
Talk:Trirefringence

message: Even in a material where ε has three distinct eigenvalues, a ray of light incident on a flat surface of the material will only be split into two rays.  I think there is some fundamental misunderstanding of birefringent phenomena going on here; see Talk:Birefringence.
As far as I can tell, "trirefringence" is mainly used to describe the case of materials with three distinct ε eigenvalues and measurements thereof.  (It has also been used to describe some photonic-crystal fibers with sixfold symmetry axes, but in my opinion that usage was based on ignorance of well-known group theory results.)  It's not a term I've seen often, and I suspect that it should be just mentioned in the birefringence article and not a separate article. —Steven G. Johnson 19:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Error &mdash; you never get three rays

message: In the case of elastic waves, two distinct shear polarizations and a longitudinal polarization are possible partial waves that must simultaneously be matched at interfaces between media.  Please refer to B.A. Auld's Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, volumes I and II, for discussion of this subject and related "conical refraction."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.108.145 (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Perspective &mdash; what about elastic waves in solids?
Talk:Beyond Daylight

message: This page carries a 'notability warning' - however, it's one album amongst others by the band, and the other albums don't carry the same warning. Although I haven't looked for sources to cite its notability, surely if the band is notable enough to have their own Wiki page, and their OTHER albums are notable enough for the same reasons, there's no reason for this one to be 'not notable'? Musicfan1353 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because the other albums don't have warnings doesn't mean that they're notable. See WP:OTHERSTUFF for some background; the presence of an article on Wikipedia shouldn't, on its own, be considered evidence that the topic is notable. It may just mean that the topic's notability hasn't been assessed or challenged. If you want to establish that the album is notable, please add references from reliable sources which discuss the album in depth. Pburka (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

text: So how would the 'not notable' ones have got past the review process in the first place? I've tried to add updates to other band pages and had them rejected for being not notable ... 86.171.132.192 (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no review process. It just depends on some editor noticing and doing something about it. Please review WP:BAND and WP:ALBUM to see what makes a band or album notable. The criteria for musicians are very, very lenient, but a local band that's never charted probably isn't going to qualify, no matter how popular they are in their own niche. Pburka (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:WC (rapper)

message: any possibility of getting a picture of WC?
Gogabego 20:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later we have one. Yay!--Tasc0 21:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: :: Please watch your words and try to refer to anyone with respect. This album was not released in 1990. You can clearly see the year in the back cover of the album here. Please stop edting this information, since what you're giving is wrong.--Tasco 0 20:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: We're in this together

message: WC is not from Compton, he is from 111 Neighbourhood which is in the South Central area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.172.230.15 (talk) 11:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: I have added and assessed the WikiProject Crime banner and assessed for the WikiProject Organized crime banner primarily on the basis of this article being assigned to the Crips category. Aside from this category assignment, there is no indication in the article that this artist has been directly involved in any sort of crime or criminal organization. Apart from this category, there is nothing in the article content to indicate why this article should be of interest to these assigned WikiProjects. If you are aware of additional sources of information not included in the article that further support these WikiProject assignments, please identify those source(s) and add that additional information to the article. If you disagree with this assessment for these WikiProjects, please explain your disagreement and justify why these WikiProjects should be removed, if you do remove them. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject assessments
Talk:Carden Aero Engines

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*support, non-controversial.  Gronky 13:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: :Add any additional comments
:Disambiguation into what? --Qviri 22:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguation as there is also a Carden, Chester (place name). Disambiguation page would list both the Carden Aero Engines, Carden, Chester, and any other Articles. --WoodyWerm 16:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Template talk:NFL team history

message: Shouldn't there be a section for "Relocated teams"? Off the top of my head, I know of at least five articles dedicated to the history of a team in a past location...
* Arizona Cardinals – History of the Chicago Cardinals, History of the St. Louis Cardinals (NFL)
* Indianapolis Colts – History of the Baltimore Colts
* St. Louis Rams – History of the Los Angeles Rams
* Tennessee Titans – History of the Houston Oilers
Please respond on this page. — Dale Arnett (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - PaulT+/C 23:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section for relocated franchises 

message: Please see a discussion regarding this template at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League#NFL Team History and Lore Templates. - PaulT+/C 19:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WikiProject National Football League talk page
Talk:Rock en español

message: Is there anything that can be done to this article besides just making a series of links?  Trends in the genre as a whole, etc? matt91486 01:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs some typo control and needs to get some facts right. Blatanly saying that Carlos Santana created the genre seems a little... inaccurate. Also, music such as "Oye Como Va" can't be credited solely to Carlos Santana. It was written by Tito Puente and performed by the band Santana, it was not a solo act by Carlos Santana.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.8.100 (talk) 00:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Santana is not even a Spanish-language act. Rock en español started in late 1950s. I'd suggest a translation from the Spanish article.  --Batamamma (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Somebody please correct the title of the article, in Spanish, languages never go with capital letter, so it would be "Rock en español", not "Rock en Español".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.76.148.33 (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move assistance requested. — Brianhe (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock en español
Talk:Grantland Rice

message: What is the date of the quotation at the bottom? Srnec 20:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Inabinnett ascribes it to his memoirs whic came out in 1954, which was also the year of his death; however, I think that the poem was orignially published ca. 1924 in a "Sportlight" column and associated with him from then on; however, I can't find a reference proving that right at the moment.  If I do, I'll post it here. Rlquall 15:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This admittedly is still not as good as it could be, but isn't it fleshed out enough by now not to be categorized as a stub anymore?  Rlquall 15:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a "stub"? 

message: Does he actually mention Babe Diderikson in that book?  It's been quite some time since I read it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.53.124.32 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Itabinnet Book 

message: Grant Rice should redirect to the article page. He is by a wide margin the most notable Grant Rice, and I see only one other Grant A. Rice with an article. Adam Wolbach (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Template talk:Cannon class destroyer escort

message: In regard to the six missing ships from this list, I believe I have found them, so to speak.  There were a total of six ships that were cancelled and thus never completed by the Navy.  you can confirm this on http://uboat.net/allies/warships/class.html?ID=80 also you can see that on http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ships/ships-de.html those six ships are not listed, because they were never commissioned.  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 20:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: after doing some more searching, http://www.destroyers.org/ShipsStore/SS-Pages/Profiles/Cannon_Class-DE.htm shows 6 ships that were transfered to France upon completion.  Perhaps, these are the missing ships in question instead.  Adding these might change the template a bit, but I'll give it a try.  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 20:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing ships 

message: From my experience, these sort of templates are not alphabetized.  This is because the template helps to show which ship came out in what order.  Hence they typcially are sorted by their number instead.  You can see this more over on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ships/Footers.  But I'm open to hearing arguments for the alphabetized version. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 07:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  alphabetizing this template
Talk:Northrop Alpha

message: Alpha & Gamma were real beauties but the information is a bit scarce. If someone could expand on differences between Alpha subtypes that would be much appreciated. - Emt147 Burninate! 20:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My reference is rather vague about the variants also. --Colputt 17:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:New Year's resolution

message: According to the references, the two studies were one and the same - Wiseman's study. I fixed the percentages (88% failure rate, not 78%) and removed the reference to "5 similar traits" which wasn't mentioned in either article. Webbslinger (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

message: H 106.204.193.181 (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New year resolution 

message: What is food pyramid 124.106.227.82 (talk) 10:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapeh 

message: I want resolutions of new year 41.114.181.77 (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Rashidi Kawawa

message: The tag which added on the article says "This biography of a living person does not cite any references or sources". Unfortunately, this person died on 31 December, 2009. Hence, the tag are no longer needed to mention as the living person. I wish I would remove the tag, but since I don't know the rules, I would rather leave it as it is! Cheers.--Mwanaharakati(Longa) 13:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I switched the tag from  → . Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: TAG for the living person

message: This is given variously.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.80.118 (talk) 11:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The 27/5/1924 and 27/5/1926 are mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7C8E:1600:C071:DB3E:7C0B:D775 (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See 27/5/1927.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7C8E:1600:C071:DB3E:7C0B:D775 (talk) 17:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: Rashidi Kawawa's activities in the January of 1964 should be mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7C8E:1600:C071:DB3E:7C0B:D775 (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1964
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Bryson Voirin

message: Since there seems to have been some question about how the vote was evaluated....I disregard opinions and comments that seemed not to have been made in good faith. In particular, the votes to keep seem to have been made by a student seeking publicity and a couple of school chums. The serious votes were all to delete. --JWSchmidt 20:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to read Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Disregarding votes because you personally disagree with them can be read as an abuse of sysop powers. Pincus 21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read it. Evidence indicates that the "keep" votes were not made in good faith. --JWSchmidt 21:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That you disagree with them is not "evidence." I don't even know James Voirin. I only know of him because he is indeed notable here in Sarasota and the Tampa Bay area. Pincus 21:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)