lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of cities in Texas

message: The city of New London, Tx is missing (pop. 998 and home of the school explosion in 1937) Jemsusan (talk) 19:03, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to add a city. 

message: I noticed that Bacliff, Texas has its own article, yet was not included in the list. I added it, even though it is classified as a CDP (Census Designated Place). Someone may want to check to see if there are other cities like it missing from the list.UrsaLinguaBWD (talk) 20:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check for Missing Cities 

message: Please define the word 'city'.  It seems you have added every town and settlement.  Isn't a city a place with more than, say, 100 000 people living there?
HeymannM (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: The Handbook of Texas http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/browse/where/communities/all?page=76 lists about 7500 "communities"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.253.137.154 (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  communities 

message: I just added to the article 245 cities I found based on the template pages for the 254 counties of Texas and deleted 175 communities that were not cities. I also resorted 24 cities to have the page alphabetized correctly (based on current standards given on that page), and removed all duplicate entries (Baytown and Bulverde were the only two). NewYorkeruser (talk) 09:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated List 

message: How about doing a list like List of cities and towns in California? Seems that Illinois, North Carolina and Texas are the only ones without additional information, i.e. just names without population and other data. 85.217.34.203 (talk) 18:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  improved list? 

message: There reads: There are 960 cities in the sections below.
I copied them to spreadsheet, and there are 963 entries (after removing ABC... headers). If there's three entries which are not cities, is there any way to find them? Not too easy, I think. 85.217.20.204 (talk) 03:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  960 cities? 
Talk:Lego Harry Potter

message: * Is it true that LEGO aren't making any more Harry Potter sets? It was mentioned on the Half Blood Prince movie article that they weren't but it was unsourced. Because (as long as a cource is provided) if they aren't making any more sets, it should probably be mentioned on this page. NighthawkLeader 23:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Half Blood Prince Sets?

message: Hi,  do you want to remove all the sets in table forms and clean up just like yesterday? Striker2020 (talk) 07:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As the use of tables on this page has been going on for many years and established as seen from its revision history, I think it would be best to leave it as it is. NitroPowerbank (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sets
Talk:Timeline of the Texas Revolution

message: Whats with the fredonia reference? (see timeline in 1826 square) that's marxist! (unsigned)
:HaHa. Apparently it really did occur. See Fredonian Rebellion. Does Anyone know if the writers of Duck Soup (where it is spelled "Freedonia") knew about the historical original? CFLeon (talk) 03:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fredonia? 

message: It's not the America Revolution, the France Revolution, or the Glory Revolution. See discussion at Texan Revolution. -LlywelynII (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be Texan, not Texas, Revolution 

message: I made a change on the date of Gaona's departure from Bastrop (Mina)-- from April 15 to April 5.  I am well aware of the lack of specifics available to researchers, but three facts place the date at or near April 5. 
:1) Noah Smithwick's account of his time with Tumlinson' Rangers in Evolution of a State states that the Rangers witnessed Gaona's Brigade arrive at the Colorado, and then that company of Rangers immediately heads from Bastrop toward the Brazos, arriving on the outskirts of Washington on the Brazos on the night of the full moon, which was April 1st.  So we know that Gaona arrived across from Bastrop/Mina on or about March 27.
:2) Jose Urrea's Diary states that Gaona had been delayed (for nefarious reasons) in Bastrop for eight days, so we know that after at least one day to cross the river, the occupation lasted eight days, which takes us to approximately the 5th of April.
:3) Santa Anna, departs San Felipe frustrated by Gaona's failure to appear, referring to Gaona's Brigade as "lost in the desert;" and Filisola remarks that Gaona arrived in San Felipe on April 17. 
Given the weather and lack of available routes for a fully equipped Brigade, an eleven or twelve day march is about right-- whereas a two day march (the April 15 date) is impossible.
From a April 7 dispatch from Rusk and Houston to Major Williamson, we know that, out of Washington on the Brazos, Ranger scouts had captured at least two Mexican scouts on April 6, suggesting that Gaona's Brigade probably continued on the San Antonio Road to the Brazos and then picked its way down the right bank of the river toward San Felipe.  At the expected 12 miles per day march, that is, at best, a ten day journey.--cregil (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaona's Brigade from Bastrop to San Felipe
Talk:Lego Batman

message: We need some pictures on this article! If anyone is able to obtain photographs with clear licensing guidelines, just as some editors did for the Lego Star Wars page, please do so. Thanks! Jedd the Jedi 09:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Call for Pictures

message: Batman is part of the theme, so why isn't this article merged with it. Green Shy Guy 54 (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposing a merge with the page [[Lego Super Heroes]]  

message: The company recommends writing the four-letter brand title in all caps, always. ✌️ ToniTurunen (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LEGO's own denomination 🧱🧱🧱🧱
Talk:Reggie Watts

message: Reggie Watts does meet the criteria to be included in Wikipedia.  If you check the references I put on the page, you'll find that he has been mentioned in various publications.  In addition, he is embarking on an international tour. --Farbotron 16:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a member of Maktub, he easily meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for musicians.  I'm less certain that he meets the notability standard for comedians, so the article should probably focus more on his career as a musician (while noting his recent alternate career).  Xtifr tälk 12:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Sounds like someone is jealous of Reggie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.32.175 (talk) 03:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for Noteriety

message: Article says "Brooklyn-based", but his website says "Seattle based" -- view source, and see the "description" meta tag. --Dwchin (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homebase city 

message: I am the manager at fords drive In would love for u to swing by and have a burger and check out our drive in 75.143.219.5 (talk) 04:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatfalls movie
Talk:Eku

message: It's the same thing, just a different way of writing it.
It makes perfect sense to merge the two articles, the final product would result in something like this:
Eku (sometimes spelled eiku) is a ancient weapon of Kobudo that is shaped like an oar. It is approximatly 160cm in length. The weapon came into use when fisherman needed some protection against invaders, especialy samurai, who carried weapons. At that time possesing a weapon was illegal and so to defend themselves many people used items they already had as weapons. The eku has techniques that are similar to those of the bo, the eku can also be used to throw sand at your opponent. The eku has a displaced center of gravity and is heavier than the bo which makes it considered difficult to master. This also means that large circular attacks can be useful since the eku's weight helps it to gain momentum.
Seriously, you ninja-nerds need to start citing sources for your fantasy weapons. -- Rogerborg 23:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bionicle Chronicles

message: isn't it worth mentioning that the books are not always officially accurate? --Toa Of Nothing 03:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but you should be specific wherever you do this. LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  C.A. Hapka 
Talk:List of Bionicle media

message: What does that mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tutthoth-Ankhre (talk • contribs) 14:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in the Matoran universe 

message: I am sure this is fake. 68.238.210.177 (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Original Bionicle 4: Battle for Power 

message: Is it OK? It is in the begining of chapter cancslled
:The fifth movie had been was intended to have been about Mata Nui, Ackar, Kiina  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.60.19.108 (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Please check this formulation

message: I know for a fact that there is a Bionicle card game in existance called Toa Nuva Reconstruction. It takes place immediately after the newly-evolved Toa Nuva arrive from their battle with the Bahrag twins, and just before the attack of the Bohrak-Kal.
The object of the game was to help the Toa Nuva re-build themselves as quickly as possible. It came in 3 sets; each set focusing on two Toa Nuva: Tahu & Pohatu, Onua & Lewa, and Kopaka & Gali. I know it existed, because I have the Kopaka/Gali set. I found it at Maijor/Wal-Mart. Jdaniels15 (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bionicle Card Games 

message: I think we should split up this article into two separate articles, or at the very least make distinctions within this one article. In my opinion, the original Bionicle story line media should be separated from the reboot story line media. Any thoughts on this suggestion? Any other suggestions about this article? --JadRad (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Kiev railway station

message: I think that we should make this as a disambiguation page, as there is a Kiev (Passenger) Railway Station in Kiev, Ukraine. Cheers, —dima/// 16:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:World Cup 98 (video game)

message: There seem to be different Versions. In hte wone one for the Nintendo 64, which I own, all Classic Matches are unlocked at once by winning the world cup, the graphics weren't b&w, and i think the commentator was the usual one --82.83.201.132 (talk) 01:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of aircraft carriers of the Royal Navy

message: Is there any specific reason that escort carriers are not in with the aircraft carriers? Seems to me it just complicates the navigation. Corvettes and Sloops are together, Light and Heavy cruisers are on the same list, why not aircraft carriers? Emoscopes Talk 14:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections after 10 days so I've gone ahead and done it, and nominated the escort carrier list for deletion. While I was at it I formatted the list and added seaplane carriers and MACs. Emoscopes Talk 15:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:BrikWars

message: God, this is a mess. Looks thrown together by someone who only briefly skimmed the BrikWars website. The links are random and irrelevant, BrikWars is NOT LEGO SPECIFIC, and the whole article treats the game as if it's some sort of joke. I'm working on editing this to be at least a bit informative, perhaps the BrikWars community will assist at some point.
--Youaredoome0 (talk) 01:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting on this... 

message: Eventually, we should have the following sections:
*Play overview
*Game history
*See also
*External links
If you can think of any more, post them.
--Youaredoome0 (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline 

message: does someone want to check out the 'history' bit? It reads like something from uncyclopaedia --Dak (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  history
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Novas Software, Inc.

message: I don't understand why this entry would be considered 'spam.'  There is no 'advertising language' present in the entry.  Why is this entry considered for deletion while entries for other EDA companies (such as Mentor Graphics, Synplicity, Synopsys, and lots more) have entries that are a lot more 'advertisial' in tone than this specific one?
I would appreciate an answer.  I think this entry is unfairly being considered for deletion.
*I suggest you place a "keep" vote on the project page, since you are in favour of retaining the article.  Fairness is decided by the community as a whole with regard to the various comments left there, also with regard to the article itself, and the general ethos of wikipedia.  Other articles are not considered relevant when deciding upon an individual nomination.  If you view pages are advertorial yourself you are perfectly entitled to nominate them yourself, too.  Fiddle Faddle 17:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Courageous-class aircraft carrier

message: Hi, I've reached this article from the entry for the "Glorious class" in the wikiarticle List of battlecruisers of the Royal Navy. However, this article is devoted to Glorious class as aircraft carrier, not as the original battlecruiser design. Shouldn't it be better if an article dedicated to the battlecruiser class exists, and all the detailed "generic" info about the battlecruisers in this article is relocated to it, just leaving a summary and a link?  Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 00:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm opposed to a split. Furious never really served as a battlecruiser, her single gun was removed and she became a pure aircraft carrier. Glorious and Courageous only served for five years as battlecruisers. It makes more sense to keep the articles on these ships together, and discuss how their designs evolved over time. We wouldn't have separate articles on Courageous as a battlecruiser, and Courageous as an aircraft carrier, but have one article that covers both periods and the transition. Similarly here we have a whole section and four paragraphs devoted to the explanation of the battlecruiser design, then a follow on section about how and why the usage of these ships changed. Benea (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Benea, thanks for your feedback! What you say about the individual ships makes sense to me. However, I have to disagree with you about the class. It's not the same a battlecruiser design (addressed in the class' wikiarticle) than an aircraft carrier one. I believe that having two different (albeit shorter) articles (interlinked) would be much more useful and accurate. What's on from this point? Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 23:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is not so large as to need splitting up, better to keep the (complex story) of their design and conversion together than end up with two shortish articles. Perhaps if this article grew in size so as to become unwieldy then it would be an idea to review the situation again. Splitting now, before basic issues such as lack of footnotes are covered would be counterproductive. GraemeLeggett (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an analogous situation elsewhere with  and ... —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 05:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't be an article about the battlecruiser class? 
Talk:Not Quite C

message: NQC is not legal in any tournaments sanctioned by FIRST.
I think this should be sourced. I haven't found anything relating to NQC on FIRST's webpages. – 84.48.198.46 17:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournament Legality 

message: I propose to move this page to NQC (programming language) in order to put a disambiguation page for the abbreviation NQC at this location. At least one other article (the National Quartet Convention) should disambiguate from NQC. Barring any opposition, I will undertake this move soon. Acdixon 14:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, Not Quite C is the better location. I have proposed it as a possibly controversial move. Acdixon 17:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page moved to Not Quite C and disambiguation page created at NQC, per request.  Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page
Talk:Cacapon Resort State Park

message: *CacaponSP.jpg Uploaded by permission. From the Webmaster of the West Virginia Department of Natural Resources, Richard Shearer- 7/13/2006: "It is our Policy that anyone can use our images as long as they credit the image to us or whoever we have credited the image, however some images on the site are Copy Protected and can not be used. Images that are copy protected have the Right-Click disabled on the image." --Mphamilton 16:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:RoboCup Junior

message: As this competition is world wide and as me myself being a national representitive i would reccommend this activity to many people.
58.174.165.40 05:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AS this

message: *Check and update
*refs
*check contents
*copyedit
*reassess once work done
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: Does anyone object to the following?
* Removing spam in rescue challenge
* Remove the focus (on the Iranian team?) from the soccer challenge
* Update soccer and rescue to refer to the current generation (which is significantly different)
* Clean up the excessive External Links
* Improve introduction and history
* Combine Notary Persons commentary into History
* Make the FLL-RCJ comparison into a table
If not, I'll try and do this tomorrow morning.
118.208.31.161 (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:HMS Hermes (95)

message: Hawkeye closed the review just as I was adding this so will put here... Performed quick copyedit of first half. Looks pretty good but I think the lead is too long -- there's detail and repetition of wording that could be cut, for instance how she was the first designed but not first commissioned carrier. At the very least I would lose (or move to main body if the citation is required there) The design of Hermes preceded and influenced that of Hōshō, and she was launched before Hōshō was laid down, but was commissioned more than six months later than Hōshō. As another example, at the end of the lead, you don't need ...that the Japanese did not attack. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late ACR comments
Talk:Community/Archive 1

message: Archive • 6 August 2002 — 11 February 2006
This is a difficult topic because it is so very broad, but the present article (seemingly not much more than a rambling set of opinions) is not acceptable as is. I am an expert in the psychological perspective (specifically in Sense of community, claimed as the conceptual center of Community psychology), but that is only one perspective among at least several that need to be represented here. -DoctorW 22:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Should "In Wales and Scotland, communities are the lowest tier of local government, equivalent to civil parishes in England." be moved to Community_(disambiguation)?Sophroniscus
: Yes. I moved them to Community_(disambiguation)#Other ambiguities Quinobi 01:01, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments and Suggestions 

message: Thoughtful people in the social sciences have not only discussed their opinions about community (as this article does), but have also done a good bit of empirical research in social psychology, sociology, and anthropology on this subject. The article Sense of community (to which I just linked), provides some well-validated empirical support for a theory of the experience of community (the prevailing view on this subject within social psychology and community psychology), and some of its content may be helpful for developing this page and perhaps even for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Community more broadly, especially in regard to areas like the one that page mentions, the Wikipedia Community Reference ("a guide to articles that deal with the definitions of community and community development in general") or whatever form such ideas may take in the future.  DoctorW 23:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource: Article on the experience of community: [[Sense of community]] 

message: Maybe my understanding of English is not good, but I find the article correct in the current form. It starts by defining community from a geographical and/or physical point of view and then extends the idea towards a psychologycal view, towards the notion of virtual community. For most people this is the normal way to consider the term, starting from its history. Considering the abstract idea before the practical realization in the society and history could be misleading.--Truman Burbank 17:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagree
Talk:HMS Illustrious (87)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
*Support, as nominator above. Emoscopes Talk 18:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. I have assumed the omission of the brackets was an error, in line with the other articles in the same categories. --Stemonitis 07:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, well spotted, my bad. Don't know how I missed that, I'm usually so fastidious about these things. Emoscopes Talk 23:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I've noticed the Polish version of this article is much more extensive and better referenced. Perhaps the English version should be a translation of that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.109.178 (talk) 00:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: Your own edit of HMS Implacable (R86) shows the info box containing info on the ship well after her commissioning date, as does the info boxes on most other RN carriers, including Ark Royal and Indefatigable. Why suddenly freeze Illustrious in Sept 1940? Damwiki1 (talk) 02:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As GAN reviewer, I queried this issue in respect of this ship, and am happy with the response of the principal editor. It seems to me that including info from throughout a ship's life would make an infobox unwieldy. For example, the number of changes to ships armament on this ship would make this infobox a hodgepodge. What configuation would you list? Surely not them all? That is what the body of the article is for, IMO. I can't speak for the other articles you mention, but it would seem to me logical that all ships should list the "at commissioning" set-up in the infobox, with changes explained in the text. Regards, Peacemaker67  (send... over) 07:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack of consistency 

message: Currently the article says that the cover force came under no attack - the cover force comprising Illustrious, Formidable, Warspite and Valiant.
However the Inperial War Museum has a picture dated 8/9th September at Selerno, describing a 2 hour long air attack by torpedoes bombers, naming Warspite, Valiant and a carrier - which could only be Illustrious or Formidable - while they covered the landings. You can see the carrier putting up a significant amout of anti-aircraft fire. 
Separately I've also read, several times that Warspite dodged atleast 2 torpedoes that night. 
So I think this section is in error. VSTAMPv (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Avalanche.