lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deprogramming

message: think about it:
* they claim you are "crazy and dangerous" to justify their force
* they use force to remove you from your everyday environment (because "your environment is a bad influence")
* they use force to imprison you in their world (because "their environment is a good influence")
* they use force to give you their "medicine" (because "their medicine is a good influence")
* all this is funded by the prisoner's "health insurance", which pays about 500 USD per day per prisoner, so of course, this "treatment" takes some weeks or months, while the doctors have practically zero work
source: i have been to jail for 3 years, and to psychiatry for about 1 year. jail is better than psychiatry: in jail, you have a clear date for your release, and you can refuse all cooperation and have your privacy. in psychiatry, you have no date for your release, you must cooperate (take their "medicine") to be released. so the mainstream culture is just another cult, using force to keep its slaves. that's why we have forced schooling.
related article: Political abuse of psychiatry Milahu (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychiatry is a legal form of Cult Deprogramming 

message: Trauma Releasing Exercises (TRE) by David Berceli
related articles: Tremor, Quakers (aka "shakers"), Bradford Keeney (Shaking medicine), Somatic experiencing (Peter A. Levine), Ecstatic dance, Runner's high, ... (its revealing that wikipedia has no articles on these "alternative medicine" topics... all hail the cult of big pharma!)
this association assumes that cults use Psychological trauma to imprison their slaves.
Psychological trauma is an emotional response caused by severe distressing events such as accidents, violence, sexual assault, terror, or sensory overload.
in every cult, there are people who want to escape. this "want to escape" starts early in childhood, where it is counteracted by punishment = by creating psychological trauma.
Sigmund Freud's Psychoanalysis always blames "some childhood trauma" for "neurotic" behavior in adults, instead of fixing the child education, to prevent the creation of that trauma in the first place = radical solution.
the cult slaves are expected to use their body only for working, not for sports, not for fighting, not for pleasure. all problems should be solved peacefully and intellectually ("let us talk..."). because the cult leaders know: if the slaves make too much use of their body (shaking medicine), the slaves would escape.
also related: Slave morality is another word for Cult, because the Public opinion of every cult is a form of slave morality (beautiful lies), and hard truths (red pills) are hidden as master morality. Milahu (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trauma Releasing Exercises are a form of Cult Deprogramming
Talk:Medicare

message: Why is there a separate link for Liberal healthcare System which simply re-directs to Healthcare system? --Grmagne 16:58:15, 2005-08-16 (UTC)
:I removed the link. This is a disambiguation page, so I don't think the other links are necessary either. Edwardian 05:10, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Editors may want to consider the information found at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) before editing this dab page. -- 159.182.1.4 18:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal Healthcare System
Talk:Let It Ride (card game)

message: Looks like copyrighted content to me - the mentioned webpage doesn't seem to be public domain. jheijmans
If you don't have explicit permission from the original author to release this text under the GNU FDL, we'll have to remove it and rewrite it.  Did you speak to the author and get that permission?  --KQ
Hard to verify since the page it is "courtesy of" does not appear to be working right now. - furrykef (Talk at me) 22:28, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: Some of the listed strategy decisions do not effect house edge, so it makes no difference if the player follows the listed strategy or not.  For example, consider 4 to an outside straight.  There are 2*4=8 ways to form a straight, and 48 cards left in the deck when drawing the 5th card.  This makes the expected gain/loss on the hand 8*5 (straight pays 5:1) - 40*1 (loss pays -1) = 0.   I think these situations should be marked appropriately in the strategy. NolanAlex
QUESTION:
Has anyone seen an analysis on the expected chance of winning before the cards are dealt?  Just what is my chance of getting any winning hand?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.230.29 (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By my calculations, the odds of any hand being a winning one would be 23.865%. 69.210.137.252 (talk) 04:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategy 
Talk:Timeline of communication technology

message: 1890's-1903 - Tesla demonstrates RC model boats for the Army.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.18.16 (talk) 07:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New entries proposal 

message: Sorry for lack of suggestions on how to improve the chart "File:Timeline_of_communication_tools,_2014_update..jpg", but there are innumerable things wrong with it. The article is more informative without the chart at all. Insignificant1 (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline chart
Talk:Timeline of motor and engine technology

message: The timeline does not include specific dates for synchronous motors and DC motors. Also, I believe the list should be split into electrical motors and mechanical motors.
Contrieng (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete list

message: This timeline is a mixture of heat engine technology and other motor car technologies. I believe it would be clearer to have seperate timelines for each. There would of course be some overlap but Wikipedia is not paper . Everyone would gain from the clarity of two lists. Lumos3 12:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would the heat engine technology list be essentially this list minus the electric motor entry (which I'm not sure should be in there anyway)?  And then the Car list just be the last few entries of this list?  I would go for that, but if you intend to remove the car related entries from the heat engine list I think it's ignoring the fact that the major recent improvements to heat engines have been made in the automotive sector.  TastyCakes 22:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the alternators replacing generators entry doesn't seem directly related to engine technology...  That one is more clear cut car technology.  TastyCakes 22:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, two timelines is quite enough. Should Lightbulbs go under Heat engines...? :) --Procrastinating@talk2me 22:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to split into two timelines

message: Does anyone know who used, for the first time, the word "motor" to refer to an internal combustion engine (ICE) or an electric motor?
According to my research, initially, everything was an engine (at least in English). Then, at some time after the invention of what we now call the electric motor and the commercial success of the ICEs, they started to use the word "motor". Currently, the word "engine" is back for the ICEs. But, it seem it was never used for the DC motors.
I think it might be used inadvertently as a retronym in Wikipedia and, in general, in the Web.
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 03:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word "motor".
Talk:Timeline of clothing and textiles technology

message: There are huge gaps here - first weaving etc  Johnbod 04:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding bits as I expand History of clothing and textiles; afraid it will be a very slow process. - PKM (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Reassessed as Start class.  I can't even make a good case for this as being C-class material. - PKM (talk) 18:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Wow. Enormous gaps. Textile technology development stops in 1953. This article should be called "A historical timeline of clothing and textiles technology. It does not cover all major textile regions/ clusters. --193.197.220.142 (talk) 16:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks to those working on this.  I came here while trying to answer the question of when elastic fabrics were first introduced and didn't find my answer.  I'll keep researching and add something to the article if I can find a credible source.  If anyone finds the answer in the meantime, it would be a good addition to the timeline (and to History of clothing and textiles).  --JohnPomeranz (talk) 18:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Huge gaps

message: Sprang, I supect, is mesolithic, but its page simple describes it as "ancient." ==Monado (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does sprang fit in? 

message: Many claims are missing citations.  As well, several have an author last name and a date, but no other information!  Skingski (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference problems
Talk:Timeline of photography technology

message: Copyright Permission to modify and distribute this and other timelines originally developed by Niel Brandt have been granted to wikipedia. 
See Talk:Timeline of transportation technology
The title of this article is grammatically incorrect, it should be 'Timeline of photographic technology'. Taking a pragmatic approach, it may not be worth the exercise of renaming, but everything in Wikipedia should be as correct as possible, so an error like this is unfortunate.
What do others think? - Chris Jefferies 11:31, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: I have a page on my own website that deals with the history of digital photography (it starts with a brief history of photography itself, then links to the history of digital photography).
I would like to add it as a resource, but have been informed that I can't as it is my own site and Wikipedia rules don't allow this. Apparently someone else can take a look and add it if they feel it is worth it.
It's not a timeline, but more a commentary. I think it's an interesting read for someone who has already looked through this timeline page.
The url for my history page is: http://www.digital-photography-tips.net/history_of_digital_photography.html
I'd be obliged if someone would have a look through this page (and the links from it) and add it to the resources if they feel it is appropriate.
Thanks in advance,
Darrell.--Dazp1970 14:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link 

message: This list is exclusively for the dates of introduction or demonstration of practical technology for photography. I have removed an entry that is a proposal for a space guidance system that included an optical sensor. There is no evidence that this system was ever built or that this proposal had any impact on later developments as it is never cited. Aldebaran66 (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practical technology only 

message: This page is being actively maintained and can be used if needed http://www.ausphotography.net.au/forum/showthread.php?19220-History-of-Photography-%28A-Timeline-of-significant-events%29 KymFarnik (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  An expanded list 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Boulevard du Temple by Daguerre.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 4, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-05-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Boulevard du Temple by Daguerre.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: Canon released a 4 million iso camera this year (2015). http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/about_canon/newsroom?pageKeyCode=pressreldetail&docId=0901e02480fb7db6
Thought it seems like a technological milestone, worthy of this page, what does everyone think? Concheria (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 Million ISO Camera?
Talk:Battle of Changsha

message: Can someone explain more on what's [Second Chinese-Japanese War] ? Or it's only a phase in the Asian theatre of WWII. Please use a more common nomenclature ---- Ktsquare
:The difficulty here is that the Second Chinese-Japanese War began July 7, 1937, i.e. clearly before the recognized start of WWII.  It did not become a part of of WWII until December 1941 when Japan undertook multiple attacks on other countries. The First Chinese-Japanese War was in 1894-5.
::Before December 1941, Japan has already undertaken multiply attacks on other countries including the failed invasion of Russia and invasion of Mongolia. The so-called "First Chinese-Japanese War" was a major naval encounter and limited battles in today Liaoning, Jilin provinces and Korea between Qing Dynasty and Japan. I'm sure it has a proper name but can't recall it. It's certianly not called second or first Chinese-Japanese War. Ktsquare
:From what I can see on the net, notably quotes from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms I am convinced that there was a battle at Changsha during this period.  Unfortunately these kinds of sources do not do dates very well.  --Eclecticology, Thursday, June 20, 2002
 
::Would you show me which section(s) of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms that mentions the battle? thanx very much--Ktsquare, Thursday, June 20, 2002
:::Chapter 53
::::I just read the chapter as I have a copy of the book. The battle was just an insignificant combat of Liu Bei' forces against local militias, involving only just over 2000 men including all sides. The most important point here is that Romance of the Three Kingdoms is ONLY A NOVEL based on the Period of Three Kingdoms with many fictitious characters and incidents. Thus do not regard it as a reliable source of historical events.--Ktsquare
Actually, you would be wrong there. Romance of the Three Kingdoms is not so much a fairy tale as it is a [i]King Auther[/i]. The charecters are real, the most of the events are real, ect. However, it has been romanticized, hence the title. It can be used as historical evidence, as the person who wrote it was the son of a man who served one of the kingdoms, and used all the information gathered, which was quite a lot.
::First and foremost, please sign your comments. Second, you were sugguesting that the book can be used as evidence since the father of the author served one of the kingdoms. Then I ask you for the name of the author and his lifetime; you will know that you were wrong. I.H.S.V. (talk) 22:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sanguo zhi states that Changsha was under Liu Pan(刘磐) and later Han Xuan before Han Xuan's surrender to Liu Bei. The conquest of Changsha was better known for the first meeting between Huang Zhong, one of Han Xuan's general, and the Liu Bei force. The fictional fight between Huang Zhong and Guan Yu in Romance of the Three Kingdoms is not mentioned in Sanguo zhi.--Skyfiler 21:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:Timeline of time measurement technology

message: Copyright Permission to modify and distribute this and other timelines originally developed by Niel Brandt have been granted to wikipedia. 
See Talk:Timeline of transportation technology
What is it being listed at the end there? "Launch of data clock?" There were certainly digital clocks before 1999.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.217.174 (talk) 08:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Timeline of temperature and pressure measurement technology

message: Does anyone have an attribution for the 1592 entry on Galileo?  The earliest date I can find is about 1606-1607, which is still way before any other entry, but God is in the details, no? Dandrake 19:22 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)
:Another user has mentioned that this date contradicts with his/her research (to be verified), and has added the relevant information at Thermometer. I've added tags here and there. -postglock 04:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have posted a refrence for the date on the Talk:Thermometer. The date is 1593 not 1592. --Wiz126 05:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have posted a comment on Talk:Thermometer, which is "about... the end of 1592". There is no contradiction, just uncertainty. It is unlikely that invention happened on one day, but probably took months.  We can be reasonably sure that in 1593 a working model existed, from an idea at least as early as 1592.  Source: Robert Benedict (1984) Fundamentals of Temperature, Pressure, and Flow Measurements, 3rd ed, quoting Vincenzo Viviani.  Also John Elliott (1892) The Life of Galilei Galileo. History is less certain than the www sometimes suggests.Chemical Engineer 13:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified date for Galileo? 

message: I've seen a man named Allbutt (if you can believe it) credited withe inventing the rectal thermometer in 1866. Can somebody confirm & include?  Trekphiler 23:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Allbutt, Sir Thomas Clifford. according to Encyclopaedia Britannica 10:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking it in the rectum 

message: these are all Dead White European Males.
What about all the other worlds cultures that were well advanced
when when Europe was in the dark ages and persecuting each other?
Muslim empire, China, India, et cetera.. (unsigned)
:Answer: It would appear that they did not invent / discover the thermometer. I have never seen any explicit suggestion to the contrary. (unsigned)
:Another answer.  The very comprehensive Islamic Technology (1986) by Ahmad Y. al-Hassan and Donald R. Hill (which also covers pre-Islamic technology by way of introduction) makes no mention of temperature measuring devices.Chemical Engineer 13:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DWEM 

message: Currently hard to see pressure items. Would be better if split into two articles ? - Rod57 (talk) 00:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article into temperature separate from pressure 

message: This timeline seems to be the best current "History of temperature measurement" in WP. We need more than a timeline! Please contribute to the History section of the Temperature measurement article.-73.61.15.226 (talk) 15:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  more History of Temperature needed
Talk:Troll

message: Etymology & definitions should, at some point acknowledge the new common usage.--173.73.190.236 (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguate web/internet troll? 

message: Please change "beings from Scandinavian folklore and mythology" to "beings from Scandinavian folklore" because "mythology" is unnecessary and hatnotes are supposed to be short: "Keep explanations to a minimum; only explain vital information" 31.55.62.6 (talk) 14:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The current text has been like that for quite some time, and is consistent with the article itself.  It does not seem unreasonably wordy to me.  Murph9000 (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2017 

message: ADD to Trolls in Popular Culture:
Trolls in the Warhammer franchise are known for their regenerative abilities during combat, making them difficult to kill. A common way to kill them is by burning. 78.83.58.241 (talk) 07:32, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide reliable source that support what you want add  — Ammarpad (talk) 11:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2017 

message: Suggestion: Add a reference to the Elder Scrolls franchise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elder_Scrolls) in the popular culture section. Martin Halbert 23:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  —  IVORK Discuss 04:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2018 

message: please add: See also Rübezahl, a folklore mountain spirit of the Giant Mountains (German: Riesengebirge, Polish: Karkonosz)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.3.70.40 (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2018 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Trol and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#Trol until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Qwerfjkltalk 18:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trol" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kwe people

message: I cut:
:However most traditional practices are matrilinial related. The bakweri children follow their mother for family rituals. Marriage ties are very strict with the matrilineal than Patrilineal. A boy can get married to the fathers cousins daughter but can't do the same with the mother cousin's daughter. They consider that these matrilineal relationships are closer since they share traditional rights together.
It may very well be correct, but the editor who added it needs to cite his or her sources. — Amcaja 22:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Hello,
WikiProject Ethnic groups has added new assessment criteria for Ethnic Groups articles.
Your article has automatically been given class=stub and reassess=yes ratings. [corrected text: --Ling.Nut 22:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -->How to assess articles
Revisions of assessment ratings can be made by assigning an appropriate value via the class parameter in the WikiProject Ethnic groups project banner  that is currently placed at the top of Ethnic groups articles' talk pages. Quality assessment guidelines are at the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team's assessment system page.
Please see the Project's article rating and assessment scheme for more information and the details and criteria for each rating value. A brief version can be found at  Template talk:Ethnic groups. You can also  enquire at the Ethnic groups Project's main discussion board for assistance.
Another way to help out that could be an enjoyable pastime is to visit  :Category:WikiProject Ethnic groups, find an interesting-looking article to read, and carefully assess it following those guidelines.
Thanks!
--Ling.Nut 20:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Assessment Criteria for Ethnic Groups articles
Talk:Suez Crisis

message: According to the article, the construction of the Suez Canal was "financed by the French and Egyptian government". The Canal was open in 1869, and Egypt gained its independent 1922. Hence, there was no "Egyptian government" that could fund the construction of the canal in the mid-18th-centry. I'm proposing to change that to "financed by France". Rroy2006 (talk) 21:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Egypt was nominally independent in 1869. Actually it might have been technically an Ottoman province, but in real life it had its own government that could issue bonds I believe. Herostratus (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1869 - "financed by the French and Egyptian governments?" 

message: Source 117 should be updated to include:
|author-link=Peter Goodwin
|date=2017
|orig-date=2005
Like so: JackTheSecond (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update source 117 

message: Change that the British bought the 44% shares in the Suez company for 4 million pounds (401 million pounds in 2021 money) to (£579 million pounds in 2024) ProfessorEthan (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This number is calculated automatically by a template which uses the latest available inflation index. The number will update automatically when data for more recent years becomes available. Jamedeus (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 April 2024 

message: We've got
#Is that "not" supposed to be there in the last sentence? Doesn't make sense. What are we trying to say here?
#Unlimited? Did he really ask that? Or just something like "massive"?
Herostratus (talk) 12:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait, is there an extra "not" in this passage?