Talk:Nursery school

message: I don't have a problem with the contributors who added the U.S.-related information, nor with the information itself. However, the article *should* make clearer (a) Which parts are specifically discussing the U.S. definition of "nursery school", and (b) How the definition varies across the world.
I'd like to tidy the article up a bit, but I don't want to jump in with too many assumptions as to what the writers were discussing.
Fourohfour 14:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a little bit of information and seperated the article into UK and USA, I can't comment on countries other than the UK as that is where my knowledge lies.  I feel that the picture does not display the correct image - preschool/nursery is older children than the one shown  I do not know how to get other images though.Lynnathon 21:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have clarified the position in relation to the UK as the scottish education system is seperate to the rest of the country.  I do feel that the detail and level of information included in the american section is unnecessary.  --Brideshead 15:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages please go ahead Paul foord 16:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, I added some intro & about daycare - preschool currently redirects here Paul foord 17:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. bias (re: neutrality tag) 

message: Is this article the right one to write about Catholic preschools in, or should that go in the "Catholic School" article? I could see it going either way, and I don't want to put it in the wrong place. Lycanthrope777 19:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that depends on what you want to write about them.  Are Catholic pre-schools significantly different from other pre-schools?  If so there's probably value in writing about them here.  If it's more about what types of Catholic institutions are available to people, that would seem more appropriate for the Catholic schools article.  --Siobhan Hansa 10:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Their curriculum is different; they teach some basic prayers and the students are read to from children's books with religious themes. They also often watch religious videos to teach ideas. Also, some require uniforms and claim to be somehow "ahead" of other preschools (although these last things may not apply only to Catholic preschools). I would put this in, but I don't want to if it's going to offend people... Lycanthrope777 18:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic Preschools

message: Um... if someone looks over the log we have a very dedicated editor... User talk:69.117.20.128. Their edits start here and continue on up until the most current edit. I don't have a large problem with their edits... well other than changing the education stages box, but they just made like 18 edits in like less than 24hours. So if someone wants to check that over because I'm not impartial.  MrMacMan 23:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive article changes? 

message: Universal pre-school provision is the subject of some discussion internationally. We cannot add this line if there is no citation. (69.117.20.128 - talk)
It's not personal; I care nothing for you or your opinions.  I simply want wikipedia to be the best it can be.  We obviously are interested in similar articles and very widely on our experience and interpretation.  i am not going to "leave it" it's not about getting one's own way, see WP:OWN it's about improving an article; if I can make an article more neutral and unbiased then I will.  It is bad practice to use dictionary definitions in this way see WP:WINAD.  --Brideshead 12:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universal pre-school provision... 

message: "A nursery school is a school for children between the ages of three and five, staffed wholly or partly by qualified teachers who encourage and supervise educational play rather than simply providing childcare."
We should add this in the first paragraph instead.  What's wrong with wholly or partly by qualified teachers? Most schools have teacher assistants...and they aren't qualified teachers.  We don't need to add other professionals.  If we add that, shouldn't we add custodians, secretaries, cafeteria workers, etc.? It doesn't make sense to add professionals.  In a student's day, they only see their teachers, not other professionals.  I think it's just confusing adding the other professionals part.  When it says staffed, it is only saying the teaching staff.  Professionals are not teachers. Please tell me what you think of this. (209.177.21.6 - talk)
The current phrasing is clearer and more accurate.  There is no need to change it to the above suggestion.  Nothing would be added.  If you worked in nursery, you would be very aware of the input that the whole professional nursery team plays, more so than in main stage classes.  There is no need for the change. --Brideshead 02:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  first paragraph  

message: These two topics both concern the daytime education options of 2-5 year old children; children that are no longer babies but have not reached the age of statutory education. The nursery school article is marked with a maintenance tag saying it does not present a world view; it seems UK-centric. On the other hand, the preschool education article seems to receive less attention, at least at first glance. A merge one way or another might be best. Comments? BigNate37(T) 19:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also overlap with Kindergarten as well as Pre-school education. I think it would at least help to remove unnecessary duplication from this one, such as the history. --- Rixs (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[preschool education]] 

message: The "child picking up a book" in the picture looks more like a one-year-old. The article states that "nursery school" is meant for three to five year olds. 69.95.235.247 (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: It's necessary because both parents must work.  Or starve. If Gov. pays it, it's for free childcare so parents can 'afford' to work. Stars4change (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Free childcare

message: The Head Start program section seems to be out of place. Compared to the rest of the article, this is a large section and only related to the Nursery School Article. It reads as a synopsis to the Heart Start Program article. I propose to remove the section from the article. At the most, there should be one sentence with a link to the article (not a full section). --Boy.pockets (talk) 04:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head Start Program 

message: I just deleted "As per usual, whoever wrote this article forgot that Northern Ireland is part of the UK." which was at the end of the section on the UK. Perhaps someone could write a section on NI? Lost in space (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Ireland 

message: The nursery in Germany is referred to as Kinderkrippe or short Krippe (crib) and takes children between 1 and 3 years, while the Kindergarten takes children between 3 and 6 years. 
Schooling age in Germany is 6 years, or 7 years for those born between June and September. 
Reading, writing and calculus starts in school. Kindergarten is solely used for playing, singing, handicraft, social interaction. A vital part of Kinderkrippe and Kindergarten is being outside in fresh air. Children too young to walk are driven in large push chairs. The whole group is then taken around the village and nature, fields and forest, watching birds, worms, plants, and learning something.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.238.72.226 (talk) 09:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany 

message: Please see a proposal the various articles in the cloud around this subject. Lfstevens (talk) 04:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do please respond to the proposal presented on Talk:Preschool_education, which would affect a number of articles relating to early years eduction including this one. PeterEastern (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorg proposal 

message: Substituted at 01:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment