lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gonorrhea

message: It's important for sexual education be inclusive for those reading it 157.131.169.212 (talk) 08:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can the text changed to be trans inclusive (e.g. list symptoms for those with penises instead of men, etc) 

message: Follow "having sex with only one person who is uninfected" with ", having sex with multiple people who are uninfected", or replace it with "having sex only with uninfected people".
The current phrasing is inaccurate in that it omits sex with multiple uninfected partners as a preventive measure. It has rather obviously been included as as a political claim in favour of monogamy and against promiscuity than as a factual assertion about preventive measures. That the alteration will drive the kinds of people who say such things wild is only an additional benefit. 175.39.70.181 (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The cited sources say monogomy with uninfected partner is a preventive measure.  Please provide sources to support your requested change.  RudolfRed (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2023 

message: There isn’t much information on the typical course of the disease when given treatment. As in, how long does it last with typical treatment and how does the course of its development differ from untreated disease. 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:9089:19C9:6683:83BD (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prognosis section
Talk:Antikythera mechanism

message: The second last paragraph of the introduction includes a sentence “In 2022 researchers determined the first date the machine could show was 23 December 178 BC.” This is referenced to an article in Ars Technica on arXiv published (so not peer reviewed) research (ref 22) and the primary arXiv article (ref 23). Both references refer to the “initial calibration date”, not “the first date the machine could show”. The Ars Technica article also mentions that other researchers disagree with this proposed calibration date, “summer 204 BC” being mentioned as an alternate date. This research isn’t explained in more detail in the main article. I am going to change the reference in the introduction to more clearly reflect the nature of the proposed date and the fact that not all researchers agree with it. The reason for the selection of either of the dates should be discussed in more detail in the body of the article. My expertise is not sufficient to explain in the detail required, so I’ll leave this to someone who is better versed in the subject. Ayenaee (talk) 02:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calibration date of the device 

message: This article claims to be using British English ("artefact" vs "artifact"), but uses American English in other places -- for example using "counter clockwise" instead of "anti clockwise". Can we be internally consistent? Herodotus419 (talk) 23:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please reword everything to use British.  2001:9E8:4608:D500:F4A5:FA6F:5259:B007 (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of British English 

message: Should we mention Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny's inclusion of the mechanism, and if so, how? Brayman30 (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: it's already there, see last sentence of Popular culture and museum replicas section. Artem.G (talk) 18:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny's prominent feature of the mechanism 

message: Well, they totally made the design for the antykithera look like the actual thing right? No.
I mean I understand that they made it look "cooler", but I think that if they made it like the original it would be less like that one itch that is just out of reach. In summary, I wish that they would've been more attenuate to the details. Jeremy Porter (MD) (talk) 01:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antykithera in Indiana Jones
Talk:NAPLPS

message: A couple of years ago someone screengrabbed about 50 Telidon images from the TVOntario Bits and Bytes program from the 1980s. I just had some time recently to put them up on my TelidonHistoryProject.ca website. We could use a couple of them to illustrate what PDI and NAPLPS were capable of. I'm just not sure which image license to use. I think some of them are public domain, such as http://telidonhistoryproject.ca/images/tvo/edutel1/dsc00024.jpg which I put on the http://telidonhistoryproject.ca/edutel_index.html page. The TVOntario ones should be fine too. -- Jimj wpg 01:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TVO Bits and Bytes Screengrabs

message: I recall, as a child, noticing that each Teleguide page was indexed by a unique ID number displayed in the corner of the screen.  Curious, I punched "0123456789" into the kiosk to see what would appear.  This triggered an easter egg which asked me to confirm the purchase of a Ferrari 328. I stalked quietly out of the corridor.--74.13.131.80 (talk) 20:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Teleguide

message: There is also a very good article on videotex in Wikipedia which describes other national systems in addition to Telidon.  I have added some background material on the use of split speed modems on the discussion page.  My company Picture Data Inc. worked with Infomart and the Ontario Government on the creation of Teleguide, and did some interesting work with New York media companies on early commercialization of the medium.  If anyone is still interested I would be happy to add further material or correspond.
Cheers - Duncan George  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.135.102 (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videotex 

message: Prodigy used NAPLPS, here is an article in The Atlantic covering it: Where Online Services Go When They Die. It might be useful for expanding this article. —f3ndot (TALK) (EMAIL) (PGP) 23:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prodigy
Talk:Buddy Cole (character)

message: During The Colbert Report's Buddy Cole-Sochi coverage, "From Russia With Love", when Buddy and his production team were questioned by the police in Russia, was that an actual encounter or was it part of the bit? It certainly seemed real. Real police or not, I have to give Thompson a lot of credit for taking his character to Sochi.  http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-collections/432931/sochi-olympics-2014 Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sochi & police 

message: Is there a source for the spelling Budderick?  Buddy said once (maybe while reading a letter) that the Queen insisted on using his full name, which sounded to me more like Butterick; I'm fairly sure that that name was not mentioned again in TKitH. —Tamfang (talk) 11:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bu__erick
Talk:It's My Party (disambiguation)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. As Gore's song seems to be the primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 July 2022
Talk:Naive Bayes classifier

message: Naive Bayes has a very well-known Bayesian network representation (one node up top for the class, pointing to many independent nodes at the bottom for the features), and yet it's not in this article. A shame for sure! I don't have the time to source a vector image of the Bayesian network right now, though, but somebody else could. --MewTheEditor (talk) 14:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article really needs a figure of the Bayesian network 

message: "In the statistics literature, naive Bayes models are known under a variety of names, including simple Bayes and independence Bayes.[5] All these names reference the use of Bayes' theorem in the classifier's decision rule, but naive Bayes is not (necessarily) a Bayesian method.".  This is about as unhelpful to the reader as a paragraph can be.  Either list all the known names it is know by or do not mention it as it does not inform the reader.  Similarly, do not say what something is not, that adds nothing and is again painfully unhelpful.  Make reference to what the 'Bayes' is referring to and then elaborate.  Either way this whole paragraph needs re-writing from the bottom up.
PaddyBasher (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articulation of Naive Bayes
Talk:William Van Horn

message: Nervous Rex redirects to this article (and article says William "drew and wrote the black-and-white comic book Nervous Rex"). Nervous Rex is being reprinted by It's Alive Press: series link https://www.previewsworld.com/Catalog/Series/147541-NERVOUS-REX 207.81.183.250 (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nervous Rex news
Talk:Daffy Duck

message: * Mel Blanc (1937-1989)
* Jeff Bergman (1990-1993, 1997, 2002, 2004, 2007, 2011-present)
* Joe Alaskey (1990-2014)
* Greg Burson (1990-1997)
* Keith Scott (1991-2013)
* Maurice LaMarche (1991)
* Frank Gorshin (1996)
* Dee Bradley Baker (1996, 2008, 2016-2020)
* Billy West (1999)
* Sam Vincent (2002-2006)
* Jeff Bennett (2003-2004)
* Eric Bauza (2018-present) Looney Tunes Man (talk) 23:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 03:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2021 

message: I think we should stick with Two Main current voice actors Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza who all voiced Daffy Duck for recent productions and projects. Just like i did with Tweety, also bring back the present for Daffy Duck and Tweety Jeff Bergman can still do the voice of Daffy Duck and Tweety For every productions and projects. If Brian doesn't understand the details of these characters or actors Brian will be blocked from Wikipedia. 166.182.84.164 (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current voice of Daffy Duck 

message: My edit is daffys just a stinky duck 2601:843:100:D350:694C:3FFC:457B:4160 (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  i cant edit there so ill edit here. 

message: In Bugs Bunny Builders, it reveals he has a female cousin named Billy. 75.82.160.163 (talk) 02:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:The Silence of the Lambs (film)

message: There is an ongoing deletion request for Darla, who starred as Precious in Silence of the Lambs, which may be of interest to this page's editors. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion request for [[Darla (dog)]]

message: Under casting, Anthony Hopkins recently said in an interview that he based his character on a Stanislavsky method teacher he had at the Royal Academy named Christopher Fettes. He said this is the first time he is sharing this information.
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/jodie-foster-and-anthony-hopkins-on-the-legacy-of-the-silence-of-the-lambs?utm_source=pocket-newtab ShanePDX (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2023
Talk:Stockholm syndrome

message: This article needs a machete taken to it, primarily to excise much or most of the hifalutin psychoanalytic doubletalk. And pardon me if I've missed it, but what source ties Fairbairn (who died in 1964) to the subject of this article? EEng 18:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless someone can find a reference that connects Fairbairn's theory to Stockholm syndrome I think that the whole section should be removed. It looks like textbook WP:OR; someone has read about a theory of children's attachment to their abuser and thought that is a similar mechanism as that in Stockholm syndrome. Sjö (talk) 10:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbal diarrhea syndrome 

message: It should be included in DSM IV by now due to the fact it is a proven psychological condition/problem whereby a victim becomes intimately connected to a captor/jailor  (perfect example is Patricia Hearst or the Stockholm incident itself om Sweden,  a bank robbery in Stockholm, in 1973. Four people were held hostage by the robbers for six days; when they were rescued, the hostages attempted to protect the perpetrators, with whom they had an amicable relationship.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photolarry (talk • contribs) 08:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see nothing on the Patricia Hearst article suggesting she sympathised with her kidnappers and rapists once she escaped their physical control (i.e. she was coerced). The Stockholm syndrome page itself clearly says she was not acting by her own free will. As for the Stockholm/Olsson/Enmark incident, it was debunked by Allan Wade interviewing Kristin Enmark (cf criticism section). Wrt the DSM classification, that is covered in the criticism section as well. AFAICT there is no such thing as Stockholm syndrome as a psychological condition, which is why it's not in DSM. Yamaizai (talk) 20:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Stockholm syndrome in real life / examples

message: The overall Wiki article is clearly biased towards saying there is no such thing a Stockholm Syndrome and, if there is, it's 8% of less. It is also very selective in which cases and evidence it presents. APaul2021 (talk) 12:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. DS (talk) 16:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bias 

message: — Assignment last updated by Caitlincaterinichia (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
Talk:Super-Poulet number

message: I find the Super poulet numbers ordinary. Why?
A number d, which satisfy 2^d - 2 \equiv 0 \mod d is a Primenumber or a Pseudoprime number to base 2, because 2^d - 2 \equiv 0 \mod d is a general form of 2^{d-1} - 1 \equiv 0 \mod d.
So every Poulet number with 2 factors satisfy this. If there is a Poule number with more than two prime factors, every combination of two and more prime numbers must be a pseudoprime to base 2. --Arbol01 08:45, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super poulet numbers are ordinary
Talk:Carmichael number

message: In the section on "Distribution", the table with n and k values is not really useful, and should probably be deleted. This table takes Erdo"s's expression,
:C(X) < X \exp\left(\frac{-k_2 \log X \log \log \log X}{\log \log X}\right)
and fits k_2 values to it, for x \le 10^{21}. These values may, indeed, fit the limited data up to this point. There are two problems: The minor problem is that Erdo"s's expression is not meant to be an accurate estimate, just an asymptotic upper bound. But the main problem is that \log \log \log X grows so slowly that even x = 10^{21} is still quite small. With this limited data, we still have no idea what the final asymptotic value of k_2 in Erdo"s's expression would be, even if this expression is the correct asymptotic upper bound. MathPerson (talk) 13:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and I have deleted the table.—Anita5192 (talk) 17:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete table with n and k values 

message: The description in the overview states that "the number b^p − p is an integer multiple of p" but I think  it should read b^p - b. Lliht (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect description of Fermats Little Theorem 

message: The period should be removed from right after the equation before the following:
"for all integers  which are relatively prime to...." 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:8CCE:D7E6:36D5:D9E7 (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  punctuation
Talk:Primitive

message: The relationship between the definition of the primitive and anthropology I believe to be important in expanding this article.  They are quite intimately tied with one another, since Rousseau asked: "What experiments would be necessary to achieve knowledge of natural man?"  Perhaps more succinctly Stanley Diamond in his In Search of the Primitive states: "The concept of the primitive is as old as civilization because civilized men have always and everywhere been compelled by the conditions of their existence to try to understand their roots and human possibilities.  But the converse does not hold.  Primitive societies, so far as I know, have not generated any systematic notion or idea, certainly not any vision, of civilization."L Hamm 19:07, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What are "the definition balls of the primitive"? Unfree (talk) 03:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, vandalism Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Primitive 

message: I can't seem to find it. The only other "Primitives" page I see is the 'rock and roll' band called "The Primitives."
But also remember not everything is a word  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.135.134 (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of primitives? 

message: Can we improve the opening paragraph somewhat. The expansion by Sam Spade last year was definately an improvement on what we had before. I can also so the point of mentioning the Amish, but it seems a bit POV and misleading to launch into a discussion of religion in the lead paragraph. 
Some of the points being made by L Hamm above seem like a better way to go. -- Solipsist 19:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening paragraph

message: User talk:Fngosa has added a "copypaste" template to the top of the article, but has not filled in the source URL. As far as I can see a google search on the text in the lead paragraph shows only sites that mirror Wikipedia content (i.e. have taken material from this article), not material copied and pasted into this article. Please check this. 86.149.22.126 (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a copypaste 

message: "Primitive (phylogenetics), characteristic of an early stage of development or evolution, cf. basil"  I found no mention of "primitive" in the article, "Basil". Unfree (talk) 03:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Basil
Talk:Empty set

message: Currently the article contains (in two places) the sentence "Common notations for the empty set include "{}", "\emptyset", and "∅"."  Recently,  edited this to add "𝜙" to the list, and I reverted on the grounds that using the Greek letter phi is a typesetting cludge, to avoid having to create specialized symbols, and that it's not really a different notation.  However, it seems to me that \emptyset and ∅ are in the same boat: they are two different ways of writing the same thing (the letter Oh with a slash through it from top-right to bottom-left).  I am sort of inclined to remove one of them, or to replace them with a description in words.  Does anyone else have thoughts about this?  --JBL (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the use of phi (or varphi) is a kludge used primarily in older texts to keep printing costs down and doesn't really reflect a different notation. On the other hand, serious readers will come across these variations from time to time and maybe we should say something about it in the article. I'm inclined to not write out all the variations, as this gives them the appearance of equal status, but rather separate the common symbols and the degenerate ones and label them as such. --Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation 

message: Wow! Wikipedia has really outdone itself this time. What you call the “popular syllogism” of eternal happiness/ham sandwich is, in philosophical circles (and I know, I was a philosophy major at MIT of all places) considered a joke which is used to illustrate an invalid form of reasoning, that is, if A is B, and B is C, then A is C is invalid if the first B and the second B actually mean two different things. And that’s what’s happening in this case: The “nothing” that is better than eternal happiness means “of all things, none of them” and is itself not a thing but merely a figure of speech. The “nothing” that a ham sandwich is better than means an absence or lack of something, and that absence or lack is itself a thing. Oops! 74.104.189.176 (talk)
: That's explained very clearly in the article.  So your point is ...? --JBL (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a joke, son!
Talk:Maintenance (disambiguation)

message: The subject of maintenance is deserving of its own article, and people are already doing so in other articles.  I've copied the text of such an example from Maintenance, repair, and operations to try to get a real article going here.  I've retained the disambiguation info in the article, but I suggest it be moved to maintenance (disambiguation).  70.250.190.30 (talk) 01:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Real article

message: Two entries under Nontechnical maintenance appear to not belong here. Don't all disambiguation pages only contain terms that has the title word? Mistakefinder (talk) 04:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Do Child Support and Champerty belong here?

message: Hi all. There's an RM discussion open at Maintenance (technical) that will potentially affect this page. If you would like to weigh in on the discussion, please leave a comment at Talk:Maintenance_(technical)#Requested_move. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM that potentially affects this page
Talk:Surveillance

message: I see a ton of great and well cited content here in this article for cell phone surveillance... and not in the main article Cellphone surveillance. I'm a little shaky on some wikipedia protocols - should the data be migrated there and a brief summary left in this larger article? Seems a shame to have it here and not there. Tecuixin (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, a more specialized article should have more in-depth coverage than in a broader article where the specialized topic is only a suggestion.  So IMO cell phone surveillance material that is in this article that is not in the other article should be added there. But that is not a reason to take it out of this article....any removal from this article would be based on the normal practices at this article. North8000 (talk) 15:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cell phone surveillance content 

message: Although the introduction states that surveillance is generally overt and considered legitimate, this is somewhat contradicted in the body—especially with the discussion of broad US surveillance of the internet, phone calls, and so on. Considering that numerous federal surveillance programs are classified and covert, and that they are believed to operate to some extent or another on the wrong side of the Constitution, I propose rephrasing the introduction. (Possible phrasing, though it could use some work, might be more along the lines of "While surveillance has traditionally been considered overt and legitimate, modern surveillance programs are often classified, covert, or intended to be secret.") RookWeaver (talk) 04:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legitimate" vs "illegitimate" surveillance