Talk:Tuzla

message: What happened to the history section ?! Does someone have a problem with facts from Tuzla's recent history ? If so, please comment, but DO NOT delete an entire section. The history section was brief, but accurate and based on undisputed facts.
And what on earth is this 2007 census estimate ? Any sources ? Or is it just a lucky guess made by someone who doesn't even live in our city?
Anyway, I'll return the history bit and change one word in it for the sake of accuracy.
Wereeven 00:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm a new editor, so I'm reluctant to make changes to established articles. However, when entering Tuzla I was immediatly struck by the enourmous power plant, and it seemed to me like it must have been important to the local economy and regional interests. There also seem to be several internet articles about possible environmental concerns and the European Bank for Reconstruction's financing an upgrade and repairs in 2001. I was wondering if this bears mentioning in the article? I took several pictures that I think meet wiki's quality standars, and would be happy to let them be used if an edit would be considered useful.
JovanPanić 13:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power Plant and Photograph Therof 

message: I removed following from "history" section: 
"It was the place of the attack on non-armed forces of JNA, which were mainly Serb soldiers, who were withdrawing from the city. According to the official indictment, around 200 Serbian soldiers and their commanders were killed and more than 140 were arrested and tortured[1]."
The reason for removal was that the claim tend to be very one-sided, and the source not specially reliable. This event ("Attack on JNA, Tuzla")is still widely disputed, and I don't believe that this typical "choosing side" should be the norm for Wikipedia. Aditionally the source to which it has been refered in the article is more than problematic. This souce is the internet-portal of "Blic", a newspaper which is well-known for it's ultra-nationalist policy. If we are to uphold the standard of articles on Tuzla and Balkan during 1990's we should not uncritically refer to any newspaper, since the media was undubtebly one of the prime reasons for the war in Yugoslavia. Rather we should refer to books written by experts (historians, anthropologist etc). And since such sources for "Attack on JNA, Tuzla" are not available yet, we should rather leave the subject to be analysed by the experts than "choose" the version we like best.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z.j.medo (talk • contribs) 19:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on your username, I don't think you're neutral. Attack on JNA is widely known and there are even several videos from the event (among others, Tuzla television transmitted the attack live at the time). I.e. this event is object of no public dispute - only numbers of victims might be.
I find it however interesting that you weren't bothered by the claim that Serbian artillery killed 71 civilians, which is with no reference whatsoever, and which is an event disputable in public (disputable concerning whether Serbs really bombed the site or other sides did). But this widely known fact about attack on JNA wasn't referenced enough for you, although "Blic" is a newspaper with great reputation in that part of Balkan. I think you shouldn't have removed a referenced part of the article until you prove its irrelevance or POV. --Ml01172 (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the claim about "Attack on JNA, Tuzla"  

message: On the danish Wiki you can find an article: :da:Lars Møller (officer) about a danish officer who in 1994 bacame famous for his service. He was chief for a tank-unit under UN-command. Under a gunfire April, 29 1994, he fired against a bosnian-serbian unit trying to attack Tuzla. That was the first operation, where UN had used heavy weapons.
I belive that it would be a good idea to mention that somewhere in the english Wiki, so maybe someone could veryfy the information and whrite aboute it in english? (:da:Bruger:MGA73) --87.59.135.203 (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So far, the article has two normal-size sections: History and Contemporary Tuzla (which, BTW, contains everything but history). I think it would be more useful to add to the Contemporary section, than to add marginally notable events to History section. After all, Tuzla was not invented in the early 1990s and the article should not present such a view (which it already does). Admiral Norton (talk) 20:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danish efford to protect the population 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Tuzla's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "B92":
From Veliki brat 2007:  
From 1992 attack on the JNA in Tuzla: B92: Bodies of 17 JNA members identified
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Tuzla]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tuzla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100312062000/http://www.bit.ba:80/BITCenterTuzla/ENG/AboutUs/TWC/index.htm to http://www.bit.ba/BITCenterTuzla/ENG/AboutUs/TWC/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090611083203/http://www.untz.ba:80/about/o_univerzitetu.htm to http://www.untz.ba/about/o_univerzitetu.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tuzla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005004153/http://www.adriaticoinfiore.eu/english/partners/tuzla.html to http://www.adriaticoinfiore.eu/english/partners/tuzla.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 08:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion