lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fianna Fáil

message: Disputed whether conservatism should be included as an ideology on the party in the infobox. More information can be found on the talk page. Helper201 (talk) 04:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - A pro-life presence in Fianna Fail is a data point in regard to the party's ideology, but it's hardly dispositive. (Also, Helper201's posts above make it clear that the party is not monolithic on abortion.) The many talk page discussions about the party's ideology should make it clear that it's a nuanced question. The dismissive "sky is blue" comment is off base. SunCrow (talk) 07:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a "datapoint" that's existed in the party since well before 1983... BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests for comment 

message: There really isn't a set ideology except Irish unity and it has members across the spectrum. Social conservativism alone does not a right-wring party make. The Communist Party of Russia for example, is socially conservative but is often considered far-left and not right-wing or syncretic. 72.72.206.209 (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a reliable source to explicitly call the party big tent. If you can provide one then we could add it using that as a citation. Helper201 (talk) 06:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Position should be Big Tent
Talk:Battle of New Orleans

message: Some POV diatribe was added a while ago, unsourced. and I thought it advisable to challenge what has been put forward. It seems to be very juvenile
:Before New Orleans the war was overall a bloody stalemate with not a single overwhelming land battle victory for the Americans against an elite British Army unit (Lake Erie, Plattsburgh, and Baltimore were won primarily due to naval ships and forts near lakes or the ocean).  New England as a whole was against the war.
1. This was not the Eastern Front in 1942. Where is the evidence that it was a 'bloody' stalemate?
2. Given the defeat of the "Darth Vader tea-drinking panzergrenadier division" that had just been covered in laurels at its engagement at Hoth, only to be pulverised at Chalmette by Old Hickory and the A-Team, what credentials does this have as an elite British Army unit?
3. Other than Andrew Jackson fanboys, are there reliable sources that do not consider the outcomes of these three battles as significant? I thought there were direct implications in the negotiations at Ghent in 1814 as a result? This was clearly not the case for the outcome of the Battle of New Orleans, although there is of course the separate debate as to whether Britain would have seized the territory. Keith H99 (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only major American victory?
Talk:University of Bristol

message: 'It is the largest independent employer in Bristol.'  What does that mean?  Independent of what?  109.158.6.129 (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent 

message: What is a junior doctorate? 109.158.6.129 (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junior doctorate 

message: Julia Donaldson https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Donaldson 91.168.47.32 (talk) 21:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julia Donaldson in alumni (writers) 

message: This page feels cluttered. There is a lot about disparate stories from the University's recent history. The University's history has its own dedicated page. I think some elements from the history section would be better merged into there. Brizzle95 (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think the page is cluttered, and want to move some individual stories from the history subheading to the history page. I would like to hear opinions from other editors first, as this could be a significant change. Brizzle95 (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cluttered
Talk:S-block

message: These elements have noble gas structures (???)
Sounds like an error, surely hydrogen is not a noble gas.
Does anybody have any information about why it is called the "s" block? I believe it is something to do with a german name, but I am not certain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viola16 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "S" is short for "sharp". It's a bit of old terminology from spectroscopy, and the names are descriptive of the spectral lines observed. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  S is indeed short for sharp, it comes from one of the principle quantum numbers (the others being n, l, and m) It isn't German ... and the name has stayed the same for some time now. Neeya The Great (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

message: I saw that quite a few "Citation needed"s were attached to basic statements that are a definite given. Example : They are extremely valuable as reducing agents to extract titanium, zirconium, thorium and tantalum from their ores, and have other uses as reducing agents in organic chemistry.[citation needed]
I'm sorry, what?
Why do we need a citation for things so obvious!? With your permission - may we please remove these tags?
Neeya The Great (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Group 18, He, is in the sidebar. Is that correct? -DePiep (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because He has electron configuration 1s2 and is thus an s-block noble gas. The other noble gases are in the p-block and shouldn't be in the sidebar (and they're not). Double sharp (talk) 01:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group 18 (He)
Talk:Superposition

message: I think that this should not be a simple redirect, as "superposition" has more meanings than the quantum one.  For example, in archaeology and geology there is the "Law of Superposition", which states that the lowest stratum in a stratigraphic stack is the oldest (yes, I know this is common sense, but it's the basis of most geology).  And yes, I'd be willing the write the article on this law. Stormwriter — Preceding signed comment added by Stormwriter (talk • contribs) 15:31, 15 November 2002 (UTC)
replies: text: And so you did; excellent job. 68.123.231.110 19:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Surely this is not the most obvious way to disambiguate the topic; most people will encounter superposition as simply the 'overlapping' of two waves. Roberdin 22:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple realities or universes!? 

message: Move the pan-dimensional string theory talk to its own page and make this one just a pure disambiguation page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.100.20.9 (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree 

message: Not having anything to do with waves!! 
The Principle of Superposition is FAR MORE general than those things having to do with waves. Most kinds of superposition in physical systems that are linear do not have anything to do with waves.
For example, in free space, superposition applies for gravitational fields, for electrostatic potentials, for magnetostatic potentials, and indeed for all kinds of electromagnetic fields whatsoever.
In linear circuits in electricity, superposition applies to DC circuits, to AC circuits, and to any kind of linear circuit whatever.
In incompressible and nonviscous gases and fluids (in fluid mechanics), superposition holds. In a simple example, there is Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures. An example of this is that in our atmosphere. Let's let Pn be the pressure of the nitrogen, Po be the pressure of the oxygen, Pa be the pressure of the argon, and Pe be the pressure of everything else (water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, etc.). 
Then P(measured) = Pn + Po + Pa + Pe .
This is purely superposition of the pressures.47.215.180.7 (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: True. However, I have trimmed back your edits slightly as this is a disambiguation page. --catslash (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not having anything to do with waves!!
Wikipedia talk:Decision Making Process

message: One thing in particular that I find frustrating and troubling now is that even the policies that we do have are sometimes not clearly stated as policies. For example, wikipedia:Policies and guidelines is the main entry point into the Wikipedia policies. There you will find that "No personal attacks", "No offensive user names", and other items that seem to have the force of policy are listed under "Specific guidelines to consider", where you will also find "Ignore all rules" and "state the obvious". 
I believe that the time has come to firmly state exactly what policies we have, and clearly separate them from "suggestions". We still want to keep the
list of policies as short as we can, but no one is served by the confusing mish-mash that exists now.
I suppose what is required first is for someone (Jimbo?) or some group to define exactly how policies are set and reviewed. (I've heard that 80% is
considered valid consensus for a policy, but where is that stated? How is the polling to be conducted?)
I'm not sure how the Arbitration Committee is proceeding where policies are vague, but it seems to me that their efforts would be only aided by any
clarification of what our policies are.
-Rholton 02:56, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are our policies?
Talk:The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui

message: Is the word in the title really "resistible" rather than "resistable"? Google gives about 20 times as many hits for the latter title. The Oxford English Dictionary allows both spellings.  AxelBoldt 17:10 Nov 15, 2002 (UTC)
I just checked the Libary of Congress, and it seems that both spellings are in use in the title, but "resistible" is four times as common. So the article is fine, Google is wrong. AxelBoldt 17:26 Nov 15, 2002 (UTC)
I find your logic irresistible, as usual. --Ed Poor
The play has been criticized for emphasizing the gangster aspect of the Nazis and ignoring their strong ideological and racist appeal. --if you'll actually quote the critic or give his name at least, we'll stop thinking that this is your own criticism. One juicy Brechtian quote might give the flavor of the play.User:Wetman
brecht also wrote the caucation chalk circle, which i cant find much about on the net!
My copy from the publishers Methuen gives the title as 'Resistible'.--MatthewPetty 11:14, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm having difficulty understanding how 'Ui' is pronounced phonetically. As a result I have to announce this character always as Arturo this, Arturo that.
"ooee"?
"yooee"?
"ooy"?
-G
Ui is pronounced 'YOU-ee'. Voici 19:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How is "Ui" pronounced?

message: The article starts by giving the 'original German title', but then goes on to say that 'Brecht never envisioned a German language version of the play'.  So what language was it written in? Ed Avis (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Language
Talk:ARM architecture family

message: Is this true? Per the ARM2 data sheet (emphasis added): "A word load (LDR) should generate a word aligned address. An address offset from a word boundary will cause the data to be rotated into the register so that the addressed byte occupies bits 0 to 7. External hardware could perform a double access to memory to allow non-aligned word loads"
To me that doesn't sounds like "no support" as this article currently claims; it clearly farms the stuff of doing two 32-bit accesses and combining parts of each to external hardware but appears to offer a helping hand should the system be set up to do that — the external bus merely needs to gate each of the four bytes to ensure it presents each from the correct access, it doesn't need to rotate them into place. 
I'd call this negligible support, but not "no support". 96.234.17.8 (talk) 18:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. That's more a special behavior than no support. I'm wondering whether this was exploited in practice. — Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 02:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No support for unaligned memory accesses in the original version of the architecture"
Talk:List of monasteries dissolved by Henry VIII of England

message: So far I've added all those in:
*Derbyshire
*Isle of Wight
*Leicestershire
*Rutland
I can't see myself completing this whole task so I'm leaving this list so people know where to pick up from.
--Rushton2010 (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Counties Done

message: This list claims that Hexhaam Abbey, a Benedictine house, was dissolved in 1537. In fact Hexham Abbey, founded 674 by St Wilfred, was burnt and razed to the ground by Danes in 875.  In 1113 a Priory of Augustinian Canons was founded on the site, and it must therefore have been Hesxham Priory that was dissolved in 1537. The technicalities of editing on this List is beyond me, so I happily leave it to others to correct (if you wish). ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hexham Abbey
Talk:University of California, Berkeley

message: Scholarship information should stay. Summerdays1 (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A vague statement presented without context is unlikely to make sense much less convince anyone of anything. ElKevbo (talk) 00:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're vague. Summerdays1 (talk) 00:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scholarship 

message: I'm disappointed there is no mention to this fact that has quite a high encyclopedical and storical relevance. 81.56.24.219 (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Levering act of 1950 

message: Reference 160 has outdated link, it is currently at avid.wiki/Chernin_Entertainment. The wiki moved to Wikiforge in the summer of 2023 as an explanation for the domain name change and reason to edit. Timpbskid23 (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced it with an article from Variety (magazine). Even if the link didn't go dead, it's still a community wiki, which probably isn't a reliable source per WP:UGC. Liu1126 (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2024 

message: A comma should follow “University of California, Berkeley” if it’s written out in running prose; see MOS:GEOCOMMA. I see this is missing in the lede sentence at least. 103.203.255.65 (talk) 19:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  I couldn't find any instances in the body text but I did find two or three uses without the comma in the citations, which I fixed. 〜 Askarion ✉ 14:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2024 

message: See: COM:R § Front doors of the Berkeley SCET on Commons. I'm thinking about adding info about the Sutardja Center to this article or Berkeley Engineering, and the requested image would be good illustration. If anyone is near the area, snapping a pic and uploading would be greatly appreciated! BhamBoi (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  File request on Commons
Talk:Age of Empires (video game)

message: Would anyone mind if I add a external link to the Age of Empires Wiki page on it? Ajraddatz (talk | contribs) 20:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As already noted, I do.  Links to wikis are discouraged in our external links guideline.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New External Link 

message: This game is never refered to as AofE, only AoE if abbreviated.  Just google AofE and you will get a tonne of non Age of Empires related videos and downloads.  I have changed the lead section to reflect this.Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage.  Do NOT click this link 07:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AofE 

message: Because Age of Empires was released during the time of Windows 95 and 98, there is a possible risk that trying to install and play the game on later Operating Systems such as Me and XP might cause serious incompatibility problems. Can anyone verify this? --Arima (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatibility Concerns 

message: I do agree with you, but How is the Age of Empires official website more authorative than Microsoft when Age of Empires is owned and made by Microsoft? -NetWitz- 07:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe my phrase "more authoritative" is not so appropriate. But AoE's official website is specialized in this specific game and its staff may have more accurate information than Microsoft's general website. And AoE's official announcement gave more detailed explanation: "We don’t have a final release date to share quite yet, but are targeting early 2018." I think it's reliable. And just because the final release date has not yet be finally decided, Microsoft Store gives "December 2018" as the release date. If you still think that the release date "December 2018" in Microsoft Store should be included, then let's put the both dates (early 2018 and December 2018) and corresponding references into the article. Is that OK? --Neo-Jay (talk) 07:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

text: ah ok thank you for clarifying, maybe put December 30, 2018 as a release deadline?  -NetWitz- 08:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, how about this: I changed the content to "On October 13, the Definitive Edition's team announced that the release date was postponed and they were targeting early 2018, while Microsoft's Windows Store changed the release date to December 30, 2018 (US time)." Please feel free to modify it. Thank you.--Neo-Jay (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

text:  Perfect!! -NetWitz- 08:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for your advice and discussion. --Neo-Jay (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitive Edition 

message: * — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBlackwing (talk • contribs) 13:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Santa Barbara County, California

message: I have restored the "localwineevents.com" link. I might ordinarily have removed it as a spamlink, but it is specifically about part of the valley's economy/culture. What tipped in its favor was the website's listing in Wine & Spirits magazine's "Best Websites" section in its Fall 2006 Special Issue (page 16, you can look it up). --Calton | Talk 01:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wine events link

message: I would like to add the following external link to this page, amongst the the other Travel and Wine external links:
*Travel Map of Santa Barbara County Wineries
I feel this site has content which is on topic, relevant and useful to many readers.  It lists all wineries manufacturing wine within SBC borders, regardless of membership to any particular appellation or vintner association.  Complete with accurate map locations and guidance on access for the general public.
However as webmaster of sbcwineries.com I face the question of COI, so seek guidance.
Webmediasb (talk) 16:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sbcwineries.com link

message: The external links section is excessive and some of it doesn't meet wikipedia standards
Links normally to be avoided
    * 4.1 Advertising and conflicts of interest (gogrape.com and sustainablevine.com)
    * 4.3 Sites requiring registration (appellationamerica.com)
and sbcwineries.com ought to be removed as the maps are just google's and the site doesnt have much substance. If you want a comprehensive site for the wine country without shamelessly promoting your business use www.sbcountywines.com , which is the vinter's association.  They provide the map all the wineries handout. I will change it eventually, but I'd rather talk about it first before I go removing anything.
Petermhorn (talk) 06:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External links clean up

message: Some of the information in the Foxen Canyon Wine Trail section comes from the merged stub article Foxen Canyon Wine Trail. AgneCheese/Wine 05:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution note

message: — Assignment last updated by Rocelynmelendez (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 1 MW
Talk:Barrison Sisters

message: It's likely that the Barrison Sisters, or a knock-off act, were the putative Five Wives.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/29/five-wives-vodka-ban-idaho_n_1553122.html
kencf0618 (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Full disclosure:  I am an employee of the Idaho State Liquor Division.  kencf0618 (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Wives Vodka 

message: Abelone Maria Barrison and Gertrude Barrison are indicated as having successful carriers of their own solo, so someone should consider writing them up. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Barrisons

message: In April 2016 someone edited here some life dates of the sisters. So Lona died 1939, Sophia 1906. No scource was noticed, may be it was this. But this scource says on p.50 Lona was the first of the sisters to die and she died in a car crash with her lover, a Philadelphian, Captain Clarence Weiner, in 1908. What is true? --Uwca (talk) 21:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Life dates
Talk:Ethnicity

message: This page uses a lot of words to say very little. It does not list main ethnic groups and the linked pages for continent specifics only order ethnic groups by language, without any division through macrocategories. It starts as a lesson for racists and then muddles everything up becoming an incomprehensible mess of links and superfluous details. It really needs some serious cleaning, less smoke and more meat. 2001:B07:A96:9FA6:C1E6:6324:C5A:90D4 (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Will do in a few months. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:56, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Attempts to correct have been made SereneNecrosis (talk) 03:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Edits by  were reverted for major structural flaws, including removal of categories and the SEe also section. There are issues with tone and compliance with the Manual of Style that also need addressed. That is without considering content, which I did not look at one way or the other. —C.Fred (talk) 03:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A very confusing article 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Silikonz💬 15:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ethnic group →  – The article not only defines ethnic groups (referred to as "An Ethnicity"), but also emphasizes the broader sociological concept of ethnicity, which is an uncountable noun. Maedc (talk) 11:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 March 2023 

message: By 331dot. Doug Weller talk 13:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SereneNecrosis got themselves indefinitely blocked 

message: Can someone help me to merge this item and this item into one item. Illchy (talk) 02:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: An  refers to an individual's ethnic background, while an  pertains to a collective category of individuals who share the same ethnic background. These distinctions are intentionally maintained between the two concepts. Kpratter (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidata 

message: While the article is generally balanced, some parts - particularly on biological essentialism - are not supported by any known study and are often based on personal reflections or feelings. Also, the debate about the extent to which cultural traits are heritable is still ongoing, and the prevailing view among geneticists is that they are. Finally, the literature cited for this article is not sufficient to support an article of this importance. 2003:A:A0B:4100:44C3:A7AE:28C0:71E5 (talk) 21:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleting cited content because you personally disagree with it doesn't really fly on Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Bias