Wikipedia talk:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man

message: I almost added something to the top about this being intended for humorous purposes only, but maybe there's a serious point here that I'm missing? Someone at a RecentChangesCamp suggested that it's about WP:POINT, but if so I think it would make me more confused about POINT rather than less. 
Could this please be tagged appropriately? --Chriswaterguy talk 02:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it isn't serious at all- it is a juvenile "WP" thing that bitchy people can throw at you just before they storm off a project. Like most of WP, it's just like the tantrums in junior high, with everyone accusing everyone of everything. Remember, don't shoot the messenger is always shouted by the editor/admin who shows up with a machine gun and a grudge.--Djathinkimacowboy 05:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious point? 

message: Has anybody actually tried to climb the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.145.115.183 (talk) 12:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but only thanks to my vigilance, being an Berlin based admin :). Lectonar (talk) 12:49, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

text: I have. *runs*  The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 11:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:AGF prevents us from accusing you of lying. Lettherebedarklight (talk) 04:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any attempts? 

message: A shortcut to this page, , has been nominated for retargetting. Your views would be welcome in the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 2#Wikipedia:SPIDER. Thryduulf (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:SPIDER 

message: The code  is causing this page to appear in CAT:SHORTFIX. How should we address this? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of {{tl|shortcut}} 

message: This disgraceful article should be deleted, on grounds of sexism and homophobia.
1) This disgraceful article should be deleted on grounds of sexism and homophobia as it oppresses all men in general and gay men in particular by allowing females in general and lesbians in particular to climb the Reichstag dressed as Catwoman.
2) This disgraceful article should also be deleted on grounds of draculophilia and arachnophobia as it oppresses Spiders while allowing Count Dracula to climb the Reichstag looking like a bat. Tlhslobus (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No u. Booyahhayoob (talk) 07:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: real mature Allaoii talk 18:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This disgraceful article should be deleted 

message: (Besides wrongly accusing me of vandalism, incidentally), you (twice) deleted a large amount of text, much of which had been there for quite a long time, and had been vieved by well over 600 people (according to the stats) without anybody expressing any objection, except eventually you. That was a Bold move. Bold moves are allowed by Wikipedia, but if somebody objects to a Bold move, there is a procedure for handling them: WP:BRD, which stands for Bold, Revert, Discuss. You have made a Bold move, I have reverted it, we should now discuss it here on the article's Talk page.Tlhslobus (talk) 11:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, upon reviewing it, what I dislike most is "Thou shalt lick Jimbo's Most Holy Posterior, and thou shalt pretend to enjoy the taste". Everything else is ok (that's one long note), but I just find it distasteful. I didn't examine your contributions in the article before, which I should have. They do fit in pretty well. Could you adjust that line? Thank you for following policy, Origamite (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've provisionally put in "Thou shalt always be absurdly sycophantic towards Jimbo, and thou shalt pretend to be happy about it", plus in the Note I have accordingly changed "deliciously tasting" to "happy", all of which conveys essentially the same message. That's because the average person's way of saying "sycophantic", a word not found in many people's vocabulary, is "arse-licking" in British English, and "ass-licking" in American English - note that I had deliberately avoided using "arse" and "ass" in the text to try not to be accused of vulgarity. However, perhaps mistakenly, I don't feel my new wording does the job all that well. If you can find a wittier way of saying it without mentioning the licking of holy posteriors, please do. Alternatively I would actually prefer something like "Thou shalt lick Jimbo's Most Holy Posterior, and thou shalt pretend to be happy about it", but if you still find that unacceptable, I guess I can live with the current 'provisional' change. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tlhslobus (talk) 20:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you figure out a way to shorten the whole thing? Now it's longer than many paragraphs in the essay itself.Origamite (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split it into 3 notes. I hope that's better. Tlhslobus (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, can you change the caption area you edited into a note? The part with the sycophantic comment? If you did that, it would be a decision to view, and if you really wanted you could return it to Jimbo's Most Holy Posterior. Origamite (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've turned it into a note, but I'll still omit his posterior, just in case it upsets anybody else.Tlhslobus (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please discuss your Bold move here, as per BRD 

message: Imagine a villain in top of the Reichstag who beat up people who didn't get to the top by climbing, and Spiderman had to defeat him. Write a section about that case  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Braden1127 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoa, Parker? Spoiler. Guy (Help!) 08:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Far worse than a mere spoiler - it's clearly an unforgivable violation of WP:OUTING (provided of course that the climber's identity is confirmed by a WP:RS). Tlhslobus (talk) 00:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: well that's still dependent on spidey being a Wikipedia editor 67.167.161.150 (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dilemma 

message: I experience a kind of inexplicable anxiety while reading this article; therefore, if this article contains fnords, I ask that they be removed. If, on the contrary, it does not contain fnords, I ask that they be added. Nlaylah (talk) 05:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . Immanentizing the eschaton is not permitted here. IAO! -The Mgt. 06:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fnords 

message: If I were to go up the correct way, then change into a spider man suit, would this be okay? I want to be sure this won't cause another revolution.
11:01 AM Mountain Time Wednesday, January 23rd, 2019.
GeorgeWashingtub (talk) 18:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not okay at present, as indicated in the section 'This page in a nutshell'. Of course once atop the Reichstag you could try changing that section by mobile phone, and then quickly jumping into your spider man suit before the minions of the Supreme Cabal had time to revert you. Tlhslobus (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a question. 

message: Should the "Humorous justification for retaining out-of-date audio" be kept as-is, kept in some alternative form, or removed altogether? Rnickel (talk) 01:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC about the outdated audio justification 

message: It took me a while but I eventually found it here. Fish+Karate 09:10, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your interesting bit of scriptural research, even though I am offended to the very core of my being by your blasphemous characterization of my favourite sacred scriptures as 'nonsense', and am hereby demanding that the Supreme Cabal impose on you its ultimate sanction.  Tlhslobus (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As the first person to reply to that thread back in aught-six (under my old username, User:Proto), I am a venerable elder of these scriptures, and can say what I like.  A pox on you! Fish+Karate 13:10, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

text: hear, hear! YamaPlos talk 23:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The source of this nonsense 

message: What about climbing Buckingham palace dressed as Batman?--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 11:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that falls askance of WP:COPYVIO without a Fair Use exception, as royalties are potentially involved. -Nat Gertler (talk) 12:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a question. 

message: I was wondering if we can move this article out of the "Humorous essays" and into the "Essays on civility".Waylon111 (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you referring to the navbox? It's clearly a humorous essay, so yes, it needs to stay in the humorous essay group. It's also in clear violation of the WP:Humor disclosure requirement, so per community consensus that cannot be overridden at a local level, it needs to have  or another indicator added.  talk 16:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sdkb - Can you add your purple thing back? That's just super-omega-clearly the correct thing to do here, right? casualdejekyll 21:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't make comments that are off topic and on a closed discussion. Waylon111 (talk) 05:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Waylon111 - The discussion wasn't closed and it was completely on topic, since the purple thing in question was a humor notice which the article needed. casualdejekyll 19:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move out of humorus 

message: Should one also use this fellow as an example, or is one concerned solely with the Reichstag?
Man who recently climbed Salesforce Tower in San Francisco Her Pegship (?) 17:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corollary potential? 

message: Feel free to put this on ur userboxes, nerds ;) InvadingInvader (talk) 07:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A gift for y'all 

message: With all due respect to the supreme cabal, especially on mobile versions of Wikipedia, most people would prefer not to see a GIANT banner of text regarding the supreme cabal in the morning, and want to read the actual joke page first. Lunacy and the Nutshell are small enough banners which don't impede mobile readers as much. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 10:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @InvadingInvader, but cabal humor is nice 88.110.55.255 (talk) 08:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the Supreme Cabal Regime Banner? 

message: Isn't he a copyrighted character? Shouldn't we do something about that? RteeeeKed💬📖 00:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See commons:COM:COSPLAY; basically Wikimedia Commons accepts images of cosplay of copyrighted characters. Di (they-them) (talk) 10:11, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I need images of Spider-Man! -- J. Jonah Nat Gertler (talk) 13:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we really use Spiderman in these images? 

message: oopsie What is this username? (talk) What is this username? (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wait is this not allowed 😦 

message: can i then climb the reichstag? Reallybadcoder (talk) 13:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would a person ever choose to not be dressed as Spider-Man? -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what if i wasnt dressed as spiderman? 

message: guysl ook
 Chuterix (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I climbed the reichstag as spiderman