Talk:Lonnie Smith (baseball)

message: I'm linking articles to Pittsburgh drug trials but now this one is skewed way too far to the negative.  Hopefully someone can expand on the positive aspects of Lonnie Smith's long career. —Wknight94 (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be fixed now. Someone else see if my revision helps. Jsc1973 04:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The Braves regular outfield for 1991 was Ron Gant, Otis Nixon, and David Justice. Other than giving people a day off every now and again, Smith only played with David Justice was on the DL (see http://www.baseballlibrary.com/chronology/byyear.php?year=1991 scroll down to the enrty for August 28, which says that Justice came back after TWO MONTHS on the DL), and when Nixon was suspended (which was on Sept. 16 see: http://openweb.tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/1991-9/1991-09-16-NBC-17.html ) Ron Gant played in 154 games that year, Otis Nixon played in 124. If Justice had not been on the DL, he would be approaching Gant's number, and the same is true for Nixon if he hadn't been suspended. There is just no way that you can dodge the fact that Smith would not have been playing in the World Series if Nixon had not been suspended. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.77.202.116 (talk • contribs) .
:Yes and no.  From what I can tell, Nixon and Smith were strictly a lefty-righty platoon.  Look at the end of http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/Inixoo0010091991.htm and notice how Nixon didn't start on 8/23, 8/26, 8/27, 8/28, 9/1, 9/3, 9/9 or 9/12.  Smith started every one - all against lefties.  It goes to your point though that Jack Morris was pitching in Game 7 so there's a decent chance that Nixon would have started but the way you're saying it is way too definite.  Smith was not Nixon's backup all season and your claim that Nixon would have done everything correctly does not have a reliable source attached.  If you can find a source, you can put a note in there saying what the source said, but without that, it's still just your speculation as far as I can tell.  I can just as easily say that Nixon only hit .195 after July (which he did) as opposed to Smith who hit .277 after July (which he did) and therefore, there would have been less likelihood that Nixon would be on base at all in that situation.  In fact, I could say that there would be less chance Nixon would still be part of the platoon because of that fact.  —Wknight94 (talk) 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, you can simply use ~~~~ to sign posts.  Second, you seem quite knowledgeable so please do stick around and get a user ID!  :)  Third, another good point about the DH in Minnesota.  What we're still disagreeing on is how speculative that assertion is.  So if Nixon is not suspended and he is the leadoff hitter, that means that he definitely would have been on first base in that situation?  Of course not!  Smith got two hits in that game - if he had gotten those same two hits from another spot in the lineup, that would have thrown off the course of the whole game and Nixon probably would not have even batted in that inning.  In fact, the Braves took seven games to beat Pittsburgh in the NLCS - with Nixon not suspended, his crappy second-half hitting may have caused Pittsburgh to go to the World Series in the first place.  I could get so speculative as to say that, if Nixon hadn't been on coke, he wouldn't have been good enough to be in the majors at all!  The reality is that this is Wikipedia so you're limited as to what can be said.  All of these speculations are original research if they have not been put forward by a reliable source.  Read WP:V and WP:NOR.  Any sort of speculation on your part or my part is not allowed.  Neither of our opinions count.  If no reliable source has done a writeup on how Nixon would have made everything better, than it doesn't belong in the article.  —Wknight94 (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Like I said, read WP:NOR.  Wikipedia is not a place for "logical inferences" and "common facts among long time Atlanta Braves fans".  Wikipedia is for stating things that have been written in books and newspapers, etc.  You can also check out WP:RS which basically says that books and newspapers, etc., have editors that do fact checking and such.  This is a perfect example of why verification is needed - I happen to disagree with your logical inferences and my reasoning is just as sound (to me anyway).  If Smith had gotten one of his two hits from the lower spot in the lineup, the entire game is impossible to reconstruct and, going further, if Nixon hadn't been suspended, the entire postseason is impossible to reconstruct.  If it were more clear cut like Bobby Cox electing not to use Nixon as a pinch-runner in that exact situation, maybe I could get behind it.  But even then, if a reliable source were not attached to it, anyone would be allowed to remove it without recourse (and they could say anything like the pitcher would have pitched to the next hitter differently or Nixon would've stolen 2b and then the next hitter would be walked intentionally or whatever).  All you need to do is find some reliable writeup which mentions the Nixon/Smith comparison and then the statement is allowed.  Otherwise, you and I are in a battle of original research and, in those situations, we both lose and no one's statement is allowed. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nixon

message: I have a question.  I seem to remember that my father had a copy of a World Series encyclopedia that was published right after the 1991 WS.  In it, there was an excerpt talking about the "base running gaffe" by Lonnie Smith, and how it "might have altered the outcome of the series".  Here is my question....if I could get my hands on that encyclopedia (I am sure that my father has it....he never throws ANYTHING away, especially not something like that) and provide a copy of the reference, would that help to resolve the NPOV dispute regarding Lonnie Smith in the 1991 series?
On an unrelated side note, I really think that poor Lonnie Smith should be let off the hook after all these years for what happened in the 1991 WS.  It is equally as easy to make an argument that the Twins' first baseman Kent Hrbek "cheated" by pulling Ron Gant off base in....Game 2, if memory serves (Tommy Glavine was pitching, he pitched Game 2).  I think the final score of that game was 1-0, and if the Braves had won that game and gone on to win the series......Well, I'll let anyone that reads this draw their own conclusions.  However, I doubt there is any mentioned of the Kent Hrbek-Ron Gant fiasco in the afforementioned WS encyclopedia anyway.
P.S. - I do not yet have a Wikipedia account, and I don't want to leave my e-mail here for the general public to see.  I'll check back later to see if anyone comments on my encyclopedia reference offer.
- A former Atlantan (and still a Braves fan despite all the heartaches).
:The encyclopedia you're looking for is probably the Neft-Cohen book "The World Series".  I don't know whether it would affect the NPOV issue, as the Neft-Cohen book may contain a POV itself.  The play itself is as much a tribute to the decoy skills of the Twins' shortstop and second baseman (Gagne and Knoblauch) as to any gaffe on Smith's part.
:Now go create your Wiki account.  It's easy to do, and makes this part so much easier.
:You think you have problems?  I live in Kansas City, and gave up on the Royals years ago.  My favorite team?  The Montréal Expos.  Talk about cursed!
:Couillaud 04:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An old baseball encyclopedia 

message: Last March 2, I made a change which was annotated as:
(→‎1991 World Series: Corrected the description of what Knoblauch did.)
The old text which I replaced was:
>replays from the TV coverage of the game showed that the Twins' second baseman Chuck Knoblauch had deceived Smith
by pretending to receive the baseball thrown in from the outfielder
Unfortunately, I cannot get to the "Battle Scars" article in "The State" (a newspaper in Columbia, South Carolina);
that's the reference mentioned in footnote attached to the replaced text and my new text.
But what I saw on youtube was what I described in the change I made: Knoblauch pretending to throw to Gagne for a
force despite not having the ball.  It does occur to me that Knoblauch could have pretended to receive a throw from
the outfield before faking the throw to Gagne, but if Knoblauch pretended to receive a throw from the outfield, I
was unable to see it.  It is rare (at least in the major leagues) for an actual throw from the outfield to arrive in
time for an infielder to throw to someone covering a base for a force.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 (talk) 15:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  a change I made earlier this month -- could there be something not in the replay I saw? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lonnie Smith (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress