lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Republic XF-103

message: Is the tag "citation needed" by the text "which would have yielded spectacular acceleration and climb performance" really needed?
Any aircraft with a thrust/weight ratio of almost 1 would have had a spectacular performance for a plane from the 50's (The F-104's was around 0.75)
Diego bf109 (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Every reference I have states the J67 was a directly licensed copy. Thus the question about what went wrong. Maury 19:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that's what makes it all so interesting (IMHO). The Olympus went right through its development and test periods and entered service in 1953 -- while the F-103 was still under design. I don't recall any complaints about the engine at any point in its long history. It's really not at all obvious what happened when Wright took it. Lots of other designs had selected the J-67 as well BTW, they all ended up looking for other engines or just being killed. Quite odd! Maury 19:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the insights Kitbag! Do you know if the J67 was significantly larger than the original, or featured a different number of stages? I'd really like a book on this, if you can suggest one. Maury 12:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The designed expectations for near-hypersonic speed (Mach 5) seem a bit off, given the heating problems likely at that speed.  Is there any referenceable statement that explains that the XF-103 would never reach those speeds even if it had the thrust, or was it actually likely to be capable of flying that fast?  166.137.210.44 (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Speed claims

message: This article states: "Mach 3 performance in the 1950s was very difficult to achieve." It still is - how many mach 3 aircraft are there running around today (or have there ever been)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.14 (talk) 12:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not difficult to achieve now so much as it's prohibitively expensive to build and operate. We certainly know how to do it, which is what "achieves" means in this context. BilCat (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?
Talk:Pat Bell

message: Please see Talk:Rich Coleman and WP:CANTALK; I've temporarily redirected Minister of Forests and Range here but it should be its own article.  I'd guess that there are other similar wrong-redirect problems out there.....Skookum1 (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ministry redirect
Talk:Pat Nolan

message: This article needs better sourcing. Here are some links that might lead to reliable sources to base content. 
:
Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 01:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BLP requires the deletion of unsourced derogatory information about a living person.  But the deletions here do not appear to be of derogatory information. Tagging the information for citation seems thoroughly justified. Deleting it outright seems, to me at least, less so.  Do others have an opinion about this? David in DC (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: BLP requires reliable sourcing for all content. Unsourced content, especially when derogatory, should be removed. The information I removed seemed to be 1) less likely to appear in reliable coverage and 2) unencyclopedic in that it presented excessive detail on rather insignificant information, given the subject's notability. See also WP:FART. If you'd like to replace some of it and mark it as needing cites, I won't dispute. But the majority of the article was simply unsourced, which is unacceptable. JFHJr (㊟) 04:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I sorta understood your opinion. That's kinda why I asked if others had an opinion. David in DC (talk) 05:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing
Talk:Rolladen-Schneider LS2

message: In three places, this article states that the LS2 was designed with “trailing edge air brakes”. This wording has been used since the article was created 16 years ago. It is not correct. The LS2 had camber-changing flaps at the trailing edge of the wing inboard of the ailerons. When fully extended, these flaps provided sufficient drag that they could be used to control the landing approach path, similar to the role of spoilers/air brakes in the majority of gliders in the Standard Class at the time.
Prior to 1973 the Standard Class rules permitted a single device for landing approach control; and a lift-enhancing device was not permitted. Consequently, Standard Class gliders had spoilers/air brakes installed on either the upper wing surface or on both upper and lower surfaces. In 1973 the Rules were amended to remove the prohibition on any lift-enhancing device. At the World Gliding Championship in 1974 in Waikerie there were two Standard Class gliders with trailing-edge flaps but no other spoiler/air brake: the LS2 and the PIK-20. In 1974 the Rules were amended, this time to again prohibit lift-enhancing devices in the Standard Class, and to introduce the Racing Class or 15-metre Class in which both spoilers/air brakes and a lift-enhancing device were permitted.
Standard Class gliders with trailing edge air brakes do exist: the Glasflügel Hornet and the Glasflügel Club Libelle are 2 examples. The LS2 is not among them.
I intend to amend the LS2 article to remove mention of air brakes and replace with mention of flaps. Dolphin (t) 12:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trailing-edge flaps
Talk:Georgy Dobrovolsky

message: Isn't it likely that his place of death is technically in space? Same goes for the rest of his crew. -VJ 21:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: place of death

message: Vladimir Komarov was the first killed during a space flight, not the Soyuz 11 crew. I don't really know what to do with the sentence that says this; completely removing it would gut the article, and his death is a notable historical event.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.223.6.248 (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Komarov?

message: Is there not a better photo that can be used? I see many better photos on Google Images. --Rebroad (talk) 10:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the best photo licensed as public domain. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

text: can you cite your sources for this please? --Rebroad (talk) 14:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  better photo 

message: I have corrected his date of death from 29 July to 30 July - the accident was at around 22:47 GMT, which is the following day in Soviet time. John Womble (talk) 07:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:West Seattle High School

message: I removed this statement:
As of recently, a continual posting of posters featuring Bob Barker, an advocate for the spaying and nudoring of cats and dogs, and the text "please spay or nudor your freshmen" has occured at the school.
I am a student at Westside and I know this happened, but I don't think it's encylopedic.  I think it may be vandalism, but I'll assume good faith.  --Tjss(Talk) 21:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is James Couture, and why are we promoting his website? Is it Notable in some way? Is he Notable in some way? Fan-1967 21:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: James Couture is a popular history teacher at Westside.  His website is a fairly significant component of all his classes, as it allowed students to access course material 24/7.  I included it because of possible student interest.  --Tjss(Talk) 03:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Couture 

message: Commons has plenty of good pictures of the school. I suggest that one of these would be better in the infobox than the logo there now. Might even want to use more than one in the article. - Jmabel | Talk 08:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: *Byron "By" Bailey, former NFL and Canadian Football League player;  Canadian Football Hall of Fame member 
*Dyan Cannon (1956), actress
*Frances Farmer (1931), actress
*Ivar Haglund, founder of Ivar's
*Lou Whittaker (1952,) mountaineer, founded Mt. Rainier guide service
*Jim Whittaker (1952), first American to climb Mt. Everest
*Gregory C. Johnson (1972) NASA Astronaut, STS-125 Atlantis (May 11-24, 2009), the fifth and final Hubble servicing mission
... needs sources WhisperToMe (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a ref for all but Bailey, I added a cite needed tag for him. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 00:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni
Talk:Rutan Long-EZ

message: Thanks for the XCOR clarification! 24.6.86.200 10:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/07/exclusive-video-yates/all/?pid=2183
Electric version of the aircraft has been created by http://www.flightofthecentury.com/ inc.
Chips Yates from flight of the century inc reportedly broke the electic aircraft speed record with it. (200 mph) (see wired article)
I'm to lazy to do it myself.
http://www.chipyates.com/
http://green.autoblog.com/2012/07/20/chip-yates-sets-electric-airplane-speed-record-lives-to-tell-ta/
http://www.gizmag.com/fotc-chip-yates-long-esa-speed-record/23417/
http://evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=28388  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.164.14 (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for update 

message: Max takeoff weight?  Range with max load?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.86.153 (talk) 01:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Load? 

message: The article on tailless airplanes goes to great pains to clarify that tailless aircraft do not have a secondary horizontal surface.  This does not apply to a canard pusher so I have removed the link.Es330td (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also section

message: is it normal for rear props to possess a completely unique running tone versus typical prop aircraft?
I saw one of these flying over head, and it sounded like nothing I've ever heard before. Murakumo-Elite (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about rear prop acoustics. 

message: Have added this on the grounds that it contains citations to useful info which might help others avoid similar problems. (Msrasnw (talk) 14:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Gleick's crash 
Talk:Ryan ST

message: Sorry for adding Harrison Ford's recent crash landing in a Ryan ST. I didn't realize it didn't meet WP:AIRCRASH. Thanks, Ahunt. Clearly, I still have a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia.
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 15:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: - Ahunt (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apology 

message: Would anyone have an issue with me refactoring this page to move most of the information directly related to the PT-22 to that respective page?   Although the PT-22 was developed from the ST it is a substantially different plane.  Thanks! sjanicki  —Preceding undated comment added 18:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Refactor 

message: My father explained very clearly that he was in the Air Force but in the Medical Corps, not the Air Corps, the Force including other specialties and the Corps including only soldiers with aviation related duties.  It is unlikely that he could have been wrong about what branches of service he belonged to, and I remember his words almost verbatim.  He was in the Army during most of the war, and did not mention these names having changed in any way.  He wore an Air Force Patch on his shoulder.— Preceding unsigned comment added by David R. Ingham (talk • contribs) 
:David, while you are technically correct, for all intents and purposes the USAAF replaced the USAAC as the top-level organization within the Army for aircraft operations, and thus can be considered its successor. - BilCat (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Force and Air Corps
Talk:Male chest reconstruction

message: How about the risk of breast cancer? - User:Hexter
:Would be a different kind of procedure less focused on aesthetic and psychological aspects. Same goes for breast reduction. ~Mable (chat) 08:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We plan to elaborate on complications of surgery, other options to the surgery, patient indications, prior to surgery requirements, cost, recovery/post-op management, and increase the amount of references. 
Cpham3 (talk) 20:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group 12 proposed edits
Talk:Official receiver

message: If there is an expert in the house, could he/she look at Administrative receivership as it may be muddling a number of similar concepts.  --Concrete Cowboy 21:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrative receivership 

message: E.g. Singapore and Hongkong. Kaihsu (talk) 08:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also elsewhere 

message: Unable to create account.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.143.26 (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wish to learn more about the responsibilities of the official receiver please. Redress and procedures on Sale under value of company's Assets
Talk:KAEF

message: A user has, several times, asserted that this station is broadcasting in HD. Please provide a citation to verify this fact. I would recommend that the references to HD be removed unless the user can provide verification of this assertion. There is a difference between broadcasting a digital signal and broadcasting a high definition picture on said digital signal. Please do not confuse the two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmking (talk • contribs) 20:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about whether this station is truly broadcasting HD content
Talk:Patrick Hepburn, 1st Lord Hailes

message: I think "1st Lord Hailes" should be added to this page's title. David Lauder 12:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:William Borthwick, 2nd Lord Borthwick#His daughter Janet.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:William Borthwick, 2nd Lord Borthwick#His daughter Janet]]
Talk:Patrick Kerrigan

message: There's a discrepancy between the date of birth/date of death and the age of death given in the article. Which is correct? Irlchrism 08:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He died aged 51. Article now corrected. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Patrick Little

message: Seems all outstanding issues have been addressed. Can we now remove the hatnote template? RashersTierney (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it; thanks for your help.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! Snappy (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

text: No problem. RashersTierney (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Citations needed'
Talk:Alejandro Gómez Monteverde

message: I don't see any indication that this person satisfies WP:BIO.  Is there another criterion/guideline/policy I've overlooked? Valrith 22:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:KALO

message: KALO turned off its analog signal on January 15, 2009 and is digital-only.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.106.150 (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Transition 
Talk:Taylor Road Middle School

message: Every year at Taylor Road we do a musical.  This year we will be doing Music Man.  It will be November 17th and 18th.   Tickets will be on sale a few weeks before we do the musical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JMANN (talk • contribs) 00:53, 6 October 2006 UTC
: Excellent. I have added this information to the article. If you know the name of the production company, let me know and I will add that also. Cheers, Vectro 02:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Man
Talk:KBIM-TV

message: Former NBC network affiliaites  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.236.140.45 (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

message: Slightly odd for us to be making humorous puns like this in WP:WIKIVOICE, but hey ho, I'll not complain I guess!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the station's fortunes would take a hard crash little more than a month after signing on"
Talk:Tim Field

message: This is the first of several Wiki entries I wish to set up, for individual leading workplace bullying campaigners. I wish to reference these wikis from the Workplace Bullying topic. This particular wiki on Tim Field I accept needs citations and I hope to sort them out soon if no one else beats me to it. Also I hope that this Tim Field wiki can be improved and expanded. --Penbat 21:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See WP:NPOV, WP:FAN, WP:COI and WP:OR.
This is not the place to post conjecture about the feelings and thoughts of an individual, nor to post praise or promotion of the work of an individual. All that should be posted here are verifiable facts from reliable sources.
This article is a borderline case in terms of WP:BIO at best, which is why, if the article is to continue to escape deletion, it must be kept neutral, verified and strictly in accord with policy.
When I edited this article this morning it was little more than a very badly written fan page. --Zeraeph 01:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please keep this article neutral and encyclopaedic
Talk:Orray

message: "From the star wars series" apparently saved this page from speedy deletion, but where would this information be merged to?  Peter O. (Talk) 21:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To List of Star Wars creatures. But what is there to merge? Looks rather hopeless. --Huon 21:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:KCBA

message: This page said that the station has the number one primetime newscast, but it didn't specify for what/where. For instance, the KTVU Oakland station claims to have the number one primetime newscast in the COUNTRY. SO, I don't know if I'm right, but I was assuming this station has the number 1 primetime newscast in the market?
--YesIMAjournalist 07:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "...It also has the number prime time newscast in the market, 'FOX 35 News First at Ten'."
hopiakuta ; [[    { %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  } ;]] 17:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[grammar]]?
Talk:Administrative Receivership

message: There are two articles with virtually the same title. Administrative receivership is the correct title according to the MoS, but this article has better content (IMO).  --Concrete Cowboy 21:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Articles clearly need to be merged, and then they need a bit of love.  Suggest merging under Administrative receivership per MoS, but copy bulk of the content over from the superior article. Legis 08:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Wyoming PBS

message: I made a few corrections to the station's text. WYOPTV (KCWC-TV) is located in Riverton, WY, not Lander. I also added that their main facilities are located on the Central Wyoming College campus (they are right off of the student center). I also uploaded the station logo and linked it up. Tyrel Lohr 23:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stuttgart Beer Festival

message: The German WP article lists nine current tents (at least seven of which could be considered "beer tents"). Purely in the interest of science, I will visit the Festival this weekend; I'll pay extra attention to the number of tents and change this article the next day. --Greenb 21:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I'd like to know why this is called "Beer Festival". This festival has never been held to celebrate beer, there are five tents where they sell beer and two tents offering wine, since Stuttgart is in the German wine growing region.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongebob223 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuttgart Beer Festival? 

message: I'm reopening the debate.  There are two pages on Wikipedia with near-identical content, this page and Cannstatter Wasen.  As the fest is not just a beer festival (pointed out in both articles), and Cannstatter Wasen is the actual name of the festival, I vote this page becoes a redirect to the other article. Hzoi (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest merging the articles too. THe only problem would be under what name. Since entering the debate last time I've completely overhauled the article for Stuttgart so clearing this up should be child's play, if other editors allow us some leeway. My personal suggestion, having lived here for 12 years, would be to call it Cannstatter Wasen and have redirects on all the other names it's given! BuzzWoof (talk) 16:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:KDRV

message: Anybody on KDRV's twitter account will notice a new avatar on their twitter page. But their website hasn't changed. Guess that will come in time. YellowAries2010 (talk) 04:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo? 

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KEET

message: A user has, several times, asserted that this station is broadcasting in HD. Please provide a citation to verify this fact. I would recommend that the references to HD be removed unless the user can provide verification of this assertion. There is a difference between broadcasting a digital signal and broadcasting a high definition picture on said digital signal. Please do not confuse the two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmking (talk • contribs) 20:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about whether this station is truly broadcasting HD content