Talk:Sydney Monorail

message: Perhaps dates of construction/commencement of service should be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.8.197 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took a trip around the Sydney monorail this morning, and shortly after leaving (I think) Paddy's Market, the train passed through what looked like a disused station - there appeared to be turnstiles and a ticket office, but the entire platform area was in darkness. I didn't see any station nameboards or anything similar.
Is this a disused station? If so, what was it called, when did it close, and why?
Alternatively, is it something completely different, e.g. a maintenance depot for the monorail trains?
Either way, I think it should be mentioned in the article :-)
202.92.72.146 07:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's Garden Plaza. It was opened in 2000, a long time after the rest of it, as the site it is on was originally disused. The tenants in the building it was in moved out, and so Metro Transport closed the station due to lack of passengers until further notice. I've emailed them and they told me that they hope to reopen it later in 2006 when the new tenants move in. My new map has the station on it, and I've added a reference to the station. (JROBBO 05:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: And now? 85.227.226.168 16:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been added back - as "Chinatown" station. I've referenced this. JRG 04:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This station is still an oddity as many of the Monorail maps don't show this station at all.  Jpp42 11:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disused station? 

message: I understand the trains go in one direction only. Could the map be altered to show which? 85.227.226.168 16:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction 

message: Why is there no mention of Frank Sartor trying for years to get the monorail closed when he was Lord Mayor of Sydney? 124.190.96.251 (talk) 13:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Give us a reliable source of this, and up it goes.--MrFishGo Fish 14:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Ross Noble commmented that "None of you in Sydney really use the Monorail do you.  You just built it to get the tourists out of the bloody way."
Yeah yeah I know, whoever the first person who doesn't want to share or who is standing rigidly with the rulebook, delete this comment and fairly.  I just thought it was funny and based in a lot of truth.  Seriously, should this lack of relevance to Sydney commuters be mentioned?
::: Probably not, I don't think it's relevant enough. What I am missing is the fact the Sydney Council was dissolved and run by the State government to force that monorail through. Must check, I do not think I dreamed that up. 2001:8003:A02F:F400:C7E:E340:479A:CEB5 (talk) 23:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ross Noble 

message: This article is an awesome source of info on the monorail's early history. Jpatokal (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Great source

message: It may be the "Metro Monorail" in theory, but everybody calls it the Sydney Monorail.  Time to rename? Jpatokal (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do it formally by using the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I like to gauge interest first, but what the hey. Jpatokal (talk) 12:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Light support - not provable from WP:COMMONNAME given number of official uses, and no immediate ambiguity problems, but all the same seems to be more colloquial, especially outside Sydney. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hpeterswald, nice job with the new images, but would you have less radically corrected images available?  Some of those, eg. :File:Metro Monorail Maintenance.jpg, are way over-HDR'd/corrected. Jpatokal (talk) 04:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive HDR in new images? 

message: "Metro Monorail" is the common corporate branding used by Veolia Transport together with "Metro Light Rail"  prior to its purchase by Transport NSW. The Advertising Metro Media Kit available on the Monorail website shows the new Government rebranded "Sydney Monorail" name and Logo. Hpeterswald (talk) 22:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sydney Monorail Rebranding 

message: What happens to the trains (and the track) after closure? Are they being re-used somewhere else? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trains 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sydney Monorail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.metromonorail.com.au/news.asp#230704
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.metromonorail.com.au/news.asp#230704
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Abeles headed up TNT, which paid for the monorail, not requiring any public money from the State Government ... I recall that Abeles said "the monorail was his gift to Sydney". If this can be proved, perhaps it can be added to the article. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 06:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir Peter Abeles? 

message: Hi all, I have recently uploaded to Wikimedia Commons a 1990 image I took,  which I think might look good in the infobox, replacing the present one "The monorail from Liverpool and Pitt Streets"; at present I have just placed my new pic further down in the text. If folk are agreeable I can swap the position of these 2 images, what does anyone think? Tony 1212 (talk) 18:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel like the existing infobox image emphasises the train a bit more, i.e. it's more salient. Your photo is fine too, it's just that the background is more of the focus I think. Fork99 (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the proposed new image shows the monorail system as a transport method around Darling Harbour better though. Yes, the current image shows the train better, but the train is just a part of the equation. Jpatokal (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My feeling (although I am no doubt biased) is that the existing one looks a bit "pedestrian" - here is the train chugging through the city environment - whereas my proposed substitute has a bit more impact - look at this space-age creation/novelty, whizzing through the air above our heads (which is the feeling that the monorail engendered for me). In other words if I were an art director promoting the monorail as an attraction, that is the one I would pick. But I am happy for others to decide... Regards Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and I've swapped in your image. Thanks for sharing it! Jpatokal (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks @Jpatokal. I think the key word in my comment above was "impact", which is why I thought this one suited the infobox best. Glad you agree. Cheers - Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swap image in infobox?