lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Whoopie pie

message: Please explain the reasons why you undid my previous changes to this article. Thanks!
:Please see  guide to improving articles and sourcing. Flowanda | Talk 00:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: h 173.48.246.116 (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Large-scale Edits

message: I don't think that "Apocryphal" is the appropriate term, and is not used in the referenced NYT article.
-- Anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.37.39.74 (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apocryphal 

message: I notice that Maine is noplace mentioned in the whoopie pie's history the account of the amish first making the pies is currently disputed, and as of january 26th Maine has won the right to make the pie it's state dessert. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV doesn't mean balancing two sides to make them even, especially when one side is clearly the winner.  Of the sources listed, clearly the New York Times is amongst the most authoritative.  And the 2009 article clearly states that "Food historians believe whoopie pies originated in Pennsylvania, where they were baked by Amish women and put in farmers’ lunchboxes" but that how it arrived "traveled to Maine is a mystery, however."   69.86.106.215 (talk) 03:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoopie pie history 

message: Oreo Cakesters (along with other commercially produced whoopies)played a huge role in popularizing the pastry. If someone wants to take the time out of their lives to somehow verify this, I think it would be warranted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.245.59 (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oreo Cakesters should be mentioned in the "In popular culture" section 

message: If it does have a German origin, it could be a variation of Bienenstich (bee sting), which is a bright dough sandwich cake filled with a sort of pudding-like creme and topped with almonds and honey. There are also other types of sandwich cakes in Germany, some involving chocolate (like chocolate cake filled with peach or apricot jam). 79.227.161.251 (talk) 11:25, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Origin 

message: The term "gob" is redirected here as a regional word for a whoopie pie. I disagree with that, but will have to come back later for that discussion. However, the term "Gobs" is a trademarked name owned by the Dutch Maid Bakery in Johnstown, PA. See this link for details. http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/sectionfront/life/johnstown-bakery-owns-rights-to-gobs-254350/
This should probably be referenced somewhere in this article.
PhotoBiker (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gobs 

message: This looks just like an individual (small) sponge cake with a cream filling. Perhaps the article should include the typical diameter of the cake. Burraron (talk) 11:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size?
Talk:Eos (magazine)

message: The article as well as the AGU itself are calling it a newspaper. On the AGU homepage, the navigation bar, drop-down list "Publications", has a link "Journals" for scientific journals and apart from it the link "Eos newspaper". -- Rainald62 (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A move to Eos (newspaper) sounds like a good idea, especially since a Google search on Eos magazine leads to a periodical devoted to the Canon Eos camera, whereas Eos newspaper is topped by links to this newspaper. RockMagnetist(talk) 20:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  think about moving to [[Eos (newspaper)]] or [[Eos (AGU newspaper)]]
Talk:County of Namur

message: Some notes on the state of this article.
Prehistory and Roman period: Mention of the gau and later county obviously does not belong into that section. Gau is a germanic word and the organisation of the county also dates into the frankish rule rather than Rome (or prehistory).
The Merovingian period: Only the first sentence of that section concerns the merovingian period. The most logical solution would be to rename the section (medieval period?). Some of the content of that section is also oversimplified, possibly outright wrong, I will try to work on that if I get the time.
I can't say much about the rest of the article, but one thing of note is that no sources are provided for any of the material.--Caranorn (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I translated it from the dutch wikipedia. Omegastar (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  the current article 

message: It seems unlikely that Dutch or its predecessors or variants were ever a major language in the county of Namur, much less the most important. Upon looking at , I can't find a single one that asserts or implies that Dutch was ever one of the main languages of the County of Namur, and even the image at right, which has the largest Dutch-speaking claim of any of them, doesn't even come close to Namur. I think, therefore, that the language in the infobox should stay as some combination of French and Walloon until somebody actually provides a proper source one way or the other. Oreo Priest talk 10:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont know much about this myself, but i would like to add that in the Netherlands, most Walloon place-names and even some northern french place-names have Dutch non-identical names (for example, the French city of Lille has the Dutch name "Rijsel"). These are remnants of the influence of the Dutch language that used to stretch out much further then it is now. Namur is called Namen in Dutch. The best known example of this is Dunkirk - which is a French city now, but the name is a corruption of the Dutch word "Duinkerken" (which means Dune-church). Again, i dont know wether they actually spoke Dutch in the past in Namur, but the Dutch language did reach pretty far into belgium in the past. Omegastar (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It did indeed reach much farther than it did today, but moreso to the west rather than to the south. I had long assumed that the 'Old Dutch' in the infobox was correct, but after searching for about half an hour, I came up with exactly zero evidence that Dutch use stretched as far south as Namur. I also didn't come up with any positive statements of the County of Namur tending towards one language or the other, but I think in the absence of evidence that it was Dutch, French/Walloon makes much more sense, for reasons that I think are self-evident. Better than my rationale, however, would be an actual reliable source with a proper statement about it. Oreo Priest talk 09:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages
Talk:Tongans

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 23:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Template talk:Alan Moore

message: The works section needs some kind of sorting and/or divisions. The bibliography is divided up inot broad company categories but that doesn't work 100%. How about decades? Then alphabetically within the decade? (Emperor 23:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that instead of "works" section, it could be split up for DC Comics, America's Best Comics, Independent etc, then list in alphabetical order.  Unless you can point to a good example of works by decades.  EXV // + @ 11:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The main problem with sorting it by companies is that he often started work in one company and finished in another. V for Vendeatta for example started in Warrior but finished in DC (and is listed under DC on the list of his works). That said the argument also works for sorting by years so you can't win ;) I think if we list them by the first company that published it we should be fine (although in theiry there is nothing wrong with putting them in twice. (Emperor 12:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks much better. I haven't done it but I suspect srting the entries alphabetically would probbaly work better than a rough chronological worting as it is now (especially as some works were spread over quite some time). (Emperor 15:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorting

message: For such templates to work we can't just include series people worked on but ones they did signficnat work on. Moore only did two issues of Glory and in the total Spawn output he only created a minor part of them and nothing that had massive impact on it. Euqally he isn't even mentioned on the Voodoo and Violator entries. So I'd recommend removing those. The list of his works is there to be comprehensive this is here to link together his major works. (Emperor 23:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  (Although, McFarlane did pilfer ideas from Gaiman (angela and the angels, cogliostro, heaven), and Moore (malbolgia, the costume being alive, his version of heavens 8 levels) and used them for the next 100 issues of Spawn.) --EXV // + @ 16:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also worth noting that concerns has been flagged over other similar templates, e.g.   and, while this isn't anywhere near as problematic as that, it would be wise to keep the amount of material confined to creations or significant contributions (hence why Future Shocks seems fine). (Emperor 17:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Along those lines... why is the film Constantine included? As best that can be gleaned from the film's article, the plot and story elements are drawn from the Hellblazer series in general, and the "Dangerous Habits" arc specifically. Moore, while creating John Constantine during his work on Saga of the Swamp Thing, had no connection to the spin off series, and the specific arc was written by Garth Ennis. The inclusion here seems fundamentally wrong. - J Greb 18:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Querying inclusion

message: The Alan Moore portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to deleted portal removed
Talk:Zutphen

message: A nice article about a provincial town, but in the Rail section a train maniac has been pouncing at his prey. Zutphen is a nice and old city, but not an important one, and it doesn't have an important railway station. This paragraph should be short and succinct. No need for the infinite details nor for all possible connections to any city in the whole of the Netherlands. Glatisant (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rail

message: I'm sure you are, or you once were, a proud citizen of the old town of Zutphen, but why are you so much stressing the importance of its railway station? It is a relatively small station, and less 'important' than nearby Arnhem, Nijmegen, Deventer or Apeldoorn. There's only one main line, Zwolle-Roosendaal, and for the rest there's only a number of 'boemeltjes' or local trains. Glatisant (talk) 14:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is true, and thus it qualifies as an important regional railway center. It doesn't say important national or supraregional or intercity station. It is the door to the Achterhoek. And it is more important than stations such as Ede-Wageningen, Almelo, Leeuwarden, Groningen or Roermond. Would you not call those 'important' regional railway centers? They sure are. Zutphen is no less important, with 12 trains per hour in 5 directions, 8 of which start there. And it is definitely more important than Apeldoorn. Whether it is more equal or more important than Deventer is open for discussion. --Piz d'Es-Cha (talk) 14:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is enough to say that Zutphen station is a regional railway center, no need to add 'important'. That's a point of view, and one that clearly not everybody shares. About the relative importance of the stations you mention is a lot to discuss, but - that's all a question of points of view, and these should remain in talk pages, not in the articles. Glatisant (talk) 15:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Important

message: Sorry - probably my mistake - 85.. IP similar to one that another editor is using for vandalism. Bob98133 (talk) 17:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sockpuppet - edit comment
Talk:Tourism technology

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/udg-sdc062008.php, http://english.visitkorea.or.kr/enu/FU/FU_EN_15.jsp?cid=289722. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NortyNort  (Holla) 11:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Tourism in Cyprus

message: This article:
* makes no mention of the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus and subsequent de facto division of the island, which had enormous consequences for tourism, especially given that the prior epicenter for tourism had been Varosha, now a ghost town.
* gives no clarity as to whether or not the article's current scope includes Northern Cyprus or not. I suspect the latter, since Turkey does not rank among the countries from which Cyprus receives tourists, but if that is the case shouldn't it be stated explicitly?
* also makes no mention of the logisitics/legalities for a tourist who wishes to visit both parts of the island.
Jmabel | Talk 00:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terribly narrow article
Talk:County of Loon

message: The description "ancien regime Holy Roman Empire" used in the lede does not seem to make sense. Dr. Grampinator (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is wordy construction, but I think it makes sense? "Ancien regime" is being used adjectively, as in "ancien regime France". Make sense?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen ancien regime used with the HRE, but at a minimum the Wikilink doesn't belong there. Dr. Grampinator (talk) 16:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: From clicking around a bit I presume what you are saying is that it is normally used to refer only to pre-revolutionary France? I can see that it gets used in different ways, and often restricted to France, so indeed maybe it's worth changing. Shame though because it is handy to have a word for the very long lasting complex of such entities which lasted from the middle ages until the revolution.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancien regime 

message: I think I need to clean up and shorten the origins section. Over time I have let it grow without much discipline. For anyone who wants to examine what is removed and potentially recover anything from this version, this is how it currently looks: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=County_of_Loon&oldid=1192608825 Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I will overhaul the origins section
Talk:Jon Arthur

message: Most sources give his birth name as Jonathan, not Jon.76.199.14.236 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Name 

message: The title of the serial was not "Captain Jupiter," but "General Comet and the .... " I can't remember the rest of the title.  In the first chapter, which predated any chapters Sparkie reported, General Comet flew away to unknown destinations, and was never heard from again.  This is all personal memory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.20.49 (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparkie's movie serial
Talk:Power Tab Editor

message: I suggest that this page be merged into the Tablature page since Powertab is actually mentioned on that page and I would be happy to discuss this on the Tablature page's talk page. Bubble anonymous (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles are on two logically separate things. This article is about a piece of software, not about musical notation. A merge template belongs on the article page, not the talk page. Since I think the merge has basically no chance of succeeding so I removed it as WP:SNOW. You can re-add it if you disagree with my opinion. Jason Quinn (talk) 19:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge

message: It didn't deserve deletion in the first place.  Let's make this a fine page! DeeKenn 23:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm glad to see this back up! 

message: Yes, I know we were shutdown by the MPA, but tablature distribution sites have nothing to do with the editor.
http://www.power-tab.net/getarticle.php?id=20 
DeeKenn (talk) 18:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power Tab Archive/Power Tab Community shutdown 

message: On this site, it is claimed that a new, re-written from scratch, open-source version has been released. Don't you that we should mention it in the article?--Dipa1965 (talk) 18:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Power Tab Editor 2.0
Talk:Khakas

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 23:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why I think the physical description is useless (and maybe somewhat racist). Instead, maybe we can use pictures to show how the people generally look, and their traditional clothes too. 75.170.82.115 (talk) 06:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Tourist destination

message: *Support This article consists of little more than a definition. I don't see how this article could be expanded much further, except by listing examples of "tourist destinations"—which would be an exhaustive and arbitrary list. Discussion of specific dynamics of tourist destinations would better go on the respective pages of the cities the destination is associated with. Tourist attraction seems a good "destination" for this article; for a tourist destination is only made notable by the presence of tourist attractions. Altamel (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Talk:Corcomroe (barony)

message: I've re-edited the page to include our adamant, but anonymous, contributor's interpretation of the name.  I have re-inserted the Parliamentary Gazeteer interpretation, since it is a verifiable, quotable source.  It would be nice if a source for the other interpretation could be provided. Gabhala 23:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I note that the article name was changed to make way for the abbey of the same name that is rather more famous. Fair enough. But the new name, while I personally am in favour of it, seems to go against an emerging consensus on the naming conventions of baronies. See the debate here that may be of interest. This would indicate that the name ought to be "Corcomroe (barony)". Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title
Talk:List of rivers of Chile

message: chile is an important to south america  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.57.119 (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:List of cities in Chile

message: I think the list of largest cities should be made into its own page. It should also be turned into an actual list of cites by size. There should also be a separate list of largest conurbations. Jason Quinn (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest cities

message: The information on this page is inaccurate (for example the population of Valparaiso) and it has a column for data from the 2012 census that is completely empty. This page should either be deleted or should be updated thoroughly 98.37.77.41 (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate and outdated information
Talk:Annitya

message: This article should be deleted since i) it mispells the term "annitya / annicca" -- it should be "anitya / anicca".  There is already an article dealing precisely with this topic under "Impermanence".--Stephen Hodge 23:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: I do agree that the spelling is incorrect. But while googling, I've found all the terms 'anicca', 'anitya', and 'annitya' being used around the webs. But I don't think that it should be deleted just because it exists with another name in english i.e. impermanence.
Annitya0 00:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stephen Hodge is of course correct that we should not have articles with misspelled titles. Instead of deleting, I'd suggest it would be easier for everyone if we simply make it a redirect. One of the advantages of redirects is that they make it possible for readers to find the right article even if they don't know how to spell it correctly.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 06:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Delete
Template talk:Respiratory pathology

message: Doesn't asbestosis full under "Lung diseases due to external agents"? Sohelpme 00:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, and it has now been added. --Arcadian 23:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: asbestosis added to list

message: Should lung cancer be listed here as well, possibly with its variants? (EhJJ)TALK 19:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lung cancer
Talk:Għonnella

message: The article mentions that the clothing was also known as a Faldetta. A google search returns more hits for this than "Għonnella" (although many of them may not be about the clothing itself). I'm just wondering why this name was taken preference for the name of the article. 78.147.129.229 (talk) 19:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Henri Martin (French politician)

message: a translation of the french article version would be appreciated Cliché Online 00:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: translation
Talk:Ġbejna

message: Does anyone here see any other articles concerning food stuffs that are laden with translations of objects like mosquito nets (???) into the food's native language? Look up a random article of a any French cheese - you won't find the authors accentuating what a room for drying cheese, for example, is in French, and the Maltese subject articles should follow the same model. I have caught onto this trend before with articles from this country - such articles are not the place for the promotion of the Maltese Language. Kindly refrain from using this format in the future, and pass this on the same couple of people who keep authoring the articles that pertain to elements emnanating from your country/culture, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.25.32.128 (talk) 07:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Awkward and redundant translations

message: Hi, I added the fact that in 2021 the farmers failed to apply the term Gbejna to EU protection: https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/no-eu-protection-for-generic-gbejna.849869 Aleks4775 (talk) 12:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ġbejna lost EU application for protection
Talk:Stratton Mountain (Vermont)

message: This is unsourced and the mountain is hardly "isolated." It sits on edge of a plateau.
Also there is some material that appears to related to the community of Stratton (?) rather than the mountain per se, which I will eliminate.
Badiacrushed (talk) 22:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing "Monanock"