Talk:Negative pulldown

message: I've been doing some work on the film-format pages. 
I'm planning to:
* Change the name of this page to Comparison of 4 perf, 3 perf and 2 perf pulldown.
* Add a diagram, showing 2,3 and 4 perf pulldowns - similar to the diagram that I added on Super 35.
* Create the following articles (and move the information to them).
** Techniscope (breaking the existing redirect to this page).
** Univisium.
I'll probably do this in the next 24 hours - but if anyone has any comments or objections - please post them here.
Megapixie 03:01, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorg

message: I've never heard that term used - anywhere, ever. I can't even find the term on google. I'm going to move it back:
* Searching for negative pulldown: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Negative+pulldown&btnG=Google+Search
* Searching for 2 perf: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=2+perf+-wikipedia&btnG=Search
* Searching for 3 perf: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=3+perf+-wikipedia&btnG=Search
 
Megapixie 23:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted to use Pulldown, which used to redirect straight to telecine due to the 3:2 pulldown. Therefore, the current pulldown page now disambiguates to either here or there, depending on what is being searched for. Since the pulldown relates to a film negative pulldown, I called it negative pulldown. Perhaps it should be retitled Film pulldown, but the old title was too clunky. That, and the article generally refers to all common forms of pulldown - so might as well just have an article on the term at large instead of just the specialized uses. It will make the subject more comprehensible, IMHO. Girolamo Savonarola 07:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Negative pulldown

message: This article uses "negative area" a few times but does not explain what this is. An explaination would be convenient, since it contributes to the name of the process - negative pulldown TheHYPO (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative Area? 

message: The image shows 3-Perf Super35 to be 0.98"x0.574" which is 1.7 aspect, but the text says that 3-perf is 1.78:1.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.46.3 (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspect Ratio? 

message: Could editors please add notable examples of short and feature films made wholly or partially with either 2-perf or 3-perf?  The article states "there has been a resurgence" - please can this be verified with reference to recent commercial applications?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Entsal007 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Examples? 

message: The 3-Perf height (in both inches and mm) in the diagram indicated "A comparison of 4 perf, 3 perf and 2 perf 35 mm film formats." is confusing.  0.574" <> 13.9mm, but 0.547" == 13.9mm.
173.226.123.97 (talk) 00:59, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-Perf Height is Confusing 

message: At the beginning of the article the fact that all "perf" measurements refer to the HEIGHT should be so stated.  I went several paragraphs deep before I realized you were not measuring width of a perforation and frame.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.164.140.223 (talk) 10:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height of a frame 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Negative pulldown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060713061542/http://www.aaton.com/products/film/35/3perf.php to http://www.aaton.com/products/film/35/3perf.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)