lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard de Belmeis I

message: The title uses a form of Richard's name that is little used: in fact, I've seen it nowhere else. Belmeis is the form generally used by historians, and has been for at least a century and a half. It is rendered thus by Eyton, DNB, ODNB and UK History Online (VCH and Fasti Ecclesiae alike). A few, like Lloyd, use Beaumais, which is simply the modernised version. French Wikipedia reckons Belmeis is the form attested for the village of Beaumais around 1050. I think it would be much more sensible to use this form in the title. I can see arguments for Beaumais, but none for Beaumis, which must confuse readers. The year of death is not really needed as the two identically named Bishops of London are generally distinguished by a number. I propose changing to Richard de Belmeis I and will proceed in about a week, assuming informed and argued opinion is not in the opposite direction. Sjwells53 (talk) 13:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect I created the page off the list at Bishop of London - so it's no worry to me. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:William the Norman

message: This is a very bad article.  Out of the skeleton of a few known dates, some past editor has erected a flimsy structure of guesswork, generic statements, redundancies, irrelevancies, and sheer nonsense (like the Norman Conquest of 1051 in which "William the Norman" overthrew King Edward the Confessor!) which reads like a 6th-grade essay whose main requirement is to fill up 10 pages.
I've deleted the major irrelevant sections and sentences, but the article certainly requires more pruning. RandomCritic (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions
Talk:Natsume Hyūga

message: There are several issues with the wording in this article, some very colloquial parts that read very badly. Can people help clean this up so it reads better? FlipsidePro09 (talk) 14:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording issues

message: I've noticed the change and moved the page from Natsume Hyuga to Natsume Hyūga.
Samantha Lim88 01:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved page 

message: I can't believe it's so fast. But do you think it's nessacary without a spoiler?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermione-asia (talk • contribs) 17:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter 86 updates
Talk:Living entombed animal

message: "A few toads that had been in the limestone (which did contain small pores) were still living." After a year. So why is this deemed impossible? ~  PonyToast...§ 20:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The toads could still get nourishment from whatever got through the pores, so it wasn't exactly the same as being enclosed in solid rock. Zagalejo^^^ 00:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wait, what?
Talk:Emotions in decision-making

message: The link at the end to Hope and Fear goes to a disambig page with no emotions-relevant topic.  (It refs the Star Trek episode, etc.)  I haven't deleted it on the theory that there's a page somewhere we should be linking to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.101.163.56 (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: broken/weird link

message: Smoncures, I was hoping to talk to you about your plans with this page because I noticed you started edting it very recently and was wondering if you had planned on continuing and if so, what your plans were for it? I am a student working as a part of a university lab project and I had interest in working on this topic. Perhaps we could touch base on what subtopics you had been planning on adding so that we could work together and avoid overlap or I could perhaps link subtopic children pages to this page? Bridge1029 (talk) 15:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Collaboration

message: Utility itself is a highly irrational concept, varying with individual and time. Perhaps there is a more neutral way to express the first paragraph. Kilgore T (talk) 01:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph
Talk:Moise Poida

message: DO these refer to the under-23's team? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Other ambitions
Talk:Pumpkin bread

message: As you all know, Native Americans are not a place, but an ethnic group. But regardless of that misconception, how can pumpkin bread be said to have Native American origins, when only 1 of its 10 ingredients are native? Yeah okay, pumpkin is Native American. But let's not look for exoticism in a recipe that is clearly European, at least mestizo. Wheat flour? It is European. Even the cooking method (baking) is European. There is not a single (serious) researcher who claims such a thing. I ask that the false information be removed, also out of respect for the natives themselves. – El Mono 🐒 (es.wiki account) 12:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of origin... Native Americans??
Talk:Scrub Island (British Virgin Islands)

message: I have done a bit of a rewrite of this article taking out some of the more egregious fluffy marketing stuff which was most likely inserted by the marketing team of the Scrub Island Resort (although I think there is still much more cleaning up that needs to be done).  
Fine to recite the factual details of the Resort, but please save the free sales pitch for either WikiVoyage or WikiTravel.  This article still needs some cleanup, but please remember to abide by WP:COI.  Thanks. 
--Legis (talk - contribs) 05:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Barangays in Cebu City

message: I just wonder why Barangay Camputhaw was not included in the list of barangays of Cebu City. The Cebu City main article says the city is divided into 80 barangays while this article says the city has 79 barangays only. Moreover, somebody made a joke (that is not funny,really) out of the Guadalupe subtopic by putting names that are linked to Tobey Mcguire and Harry Potter. Bornok 20 01:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

message: These descriptions are terrible.  I am going to come back in a week, and if no one has any objections, I'm going to strip them.  This article should probably be merged with Cebu City as proposed. Portia1780 (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Descriptions
Talk:Strait of Juan de Fuca laser incident

message: Page still in progress of editing!! ... Leeveraction 01:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Is this article long enough for sections? A template says so, but I don't see the point. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections? 
Talk:Alpine, Arizona

message: It's very close to Mediterranean (Csb), but December and January are slightly below 0 (32 F). Additionally, the low temperatures are vastly lower than the Mediterranean, or California Csa/b, record lows near -40 and mean minimums of -10 (-25 C), hardiness zone 6 vs the 8, 9, 10, and even zone 11 (San Diego#Climate) of the California mediterranean climate zone. B137 (talk) 03:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The updated 1991 to 2020 box still shows Dsb
Talk:Greer, Arizona

message: Greer doesn't have a census figure, so I made a best guess from several online articles. User:Nyttend reverted, commenting only US Census figures can be used. But this is a Catch-22 situation, and anyway WP:WikiProject Cities/Guideline, apparently the source of this rule, explicitly states that it is "just a guideline and there are no requirements to follow it in editing."
Since there are no census data, and we can make a reasonable population estimate from reliable sources, this seems a useful bit of common-sense information for the article. --Pete Tillman (talk) 01:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither of the sources provide either of the numbers that were listed for the population, so this is OR to say that the population is 90-125; in fact, one of the two sources lists all population for Greer as N/A.  What's the problem with what's called a Catch-22 (forgive me for not understanding, but I don't see how this fits Catch-22 (logic)?  Community articles nationwide depend on Census Bureau data alone, as the only definitive source: who can possibly say where Greer begins and ends, and therefore how many people live there?  With no municipal boundaries, and no CDP boundaries, there's no way anyone can determine the population of the community.  For this reason is population data for Greer impossible to source reliably, and therefore unsuitable for Wikipedia.  Nyttend (talk) 02:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't realise that Greer had a post office until just now: a ZIP Code Tabulation Area provides a good regional estimate of the area, and the reliable Census Bureau source too.  Nyttend (talk) 02:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks -- I wondered why there was no Census data for Greer. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Population figure
Talk:Wizard in Black

message: If the song doesn't merit it's own article, although it was released as part of 3 different Electric Wizard releases see the AllMusicGuide page for the original edition], then merge the information about the sample into the main Come My Fanatics... page. Generally I view Wikipedia as my source to find where samples from songs come from; however, it's often lacking for less-mainstream bands and songs like Electric Wizard and Wizard In Black.
130.126.215.10 02:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oraibi, Arizona

message: The source material does not support the description in this article that the phrase is intended to “ characterize a style of exhaustive ‘thickness’ in ethnographic writing,” but only that a kind of journal article with that sort of title often accompanies the release of such a “thick” ethnography. The source reads:
There was a time when thickness was perhaps synonymous with exhaustiveness, producing the almost unreadably detailed descriptive ethnography, often followed by the famous “Another Pot from Old Oraibi” kind of journal article.
The “Another Pot” reference describes the journal article that accompanies a “thick” ethnography, not the ethnography itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.181.114.109 (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Another Pot from Old Oraibi”
Talk:Joe Malone (politician)

message: Humarock is not a city or a town. Addresses in Massachusetts (except for the City of Boston) always use the city or town. People in Massachusetts always think of places in terms of city or town not neighborhood/village. A lot of people don't even know the name of their neighborhood or village as it appears on a map made by someone in Nebraska.
Unless there are objections, I will change this to Scituate.Bostoner (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Humarock

message: This user is repeatedly deleting sections of the article that are properly cited...not sure why.  I happened to notice it once when I came for information, and noticed the deletion when I returned the next day.  I've returned several times now to restore them, just because it irks me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.249.160 (talk) 03:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 71.232.60.145
Talk:Charity Organisation Society

message: The name of the organisation was the 'Charity Organisation Society' - with an S not a Z. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.155.209 (talk) 14:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The current scope of this article appears a bit vague. It jumps from broad international concepts to specific detail of national organisations. It may therefore benefit from edits that constrain it to the general and internationally common principles and history of the COS movement and simply link to separate articles for the respective national organisations. Separate national organisation articles would be more relevant for most of the current article categories as well. Links to notable people associated with the general principles could be retained or added as illustration (e.g. Mary Richmond as a pioneer of formal social work and casework as suggested above) but more nationally-specific content would be better placed elsewhere. As it stands, some of the content relating to Britain's Charity Organisation Society (e.g. the content relating to Alsager Hay Hill) would be better placed in the history section of the modern Family Action charity article, whilst the some of the USA-related content could at least be re-worked to make its geographic and historic context clearer, even if there is no separate article for it to be migrated to. I'm happy to tackle some of this if there is consensus (or apathy! :)  --KenBailey (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article scope 

message: Organization or Organisation? It was a while ago so we can't make any assumptions, but a Google image search seems to suggest the S spelling, in the UK. Flapdragon (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling?
Talk:Anti-aging

message: This section seems like an advertisement. The description of each doctor sounds like it was copied and pasted from their websites.Punkrockrunner (talk) 00:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, it needs cleanup. It sounde like the whole section came straight off of a pamphlet. I've removed a non-notable doctor with no wiki page. Dayewalker (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. I removed another doctor without an article, and also Jack LaLanne who doesn't seem to be an anti-aging expert as such. How about just having the names and locations of the doctors? --Bonadea (talk) 06:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Right, I went ahead and cut down the text, just keeping a sentence about where they are based and how they are relevant for the article. --Bonadea (talk) 19:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctors section 

message: There is a lot of nonsense on this page. The majority of the endeavors currently mentioned are highly criticized or disproved by mainstream scientists (eg. R. Holliday), and few main mainstream researchers are mentioned. Any time by a scientist to weed out the garbage and cleanup with referenced criticisms would be much appreciated.--Xris0 (talk) 20:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some feeble attempts at cleanup. Unsurprisingly, most of the language in the article had been plagiarised from various "anti-aging" websites. I removed the more blatant stuff and added a recent AMA criticism of the anti-aging industry. There's quite a bit more work to do, and I would suggest merging with "life extension". I don't see any important (i.e. well-sourced) differences between the two. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Much cleanup needed

message: See comments at Talk:Life_extension#Proposed_merger_with_Anti-aging --GirlForLife (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm renewing the proposed merger. I don't see any reason to have two articles on what is really the same subject. And with so few reliable sources for either article, and the very annoying tendency to WP:COATRACK for both, a single article would be much easier to maintain. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 03:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the two pages are focusing on the same concept, and one page is much better than the other. It is clear that the best thing to do is to delete the garbage page and move what little is of importance here. I think this merger/deletion of anti-aging is the only way to resolve this issue. 
Stenemo (talk) 08:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am still concerned that deleting the anti-aging page would make the life-extension page an even greater magnet for junk. --GirlForLife (talk) 12:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggestion would be to merge the two pages under the name "anti-aging medicine" and present the claims of the industry alongside the views of the medical/scientific community. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with [[Life extension]]
Talk:Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.miu.edu.pk/intro.htm. Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Reg porter (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Not enough for stand-alone notability, merge with parent university Ravensfire (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a question of different websites and admin departments, but of meeting Wikipedia's notability standards - WP:NCORP for institutions.  Your sources are mainly primary sources, that's very concerning.  Starting a merge discussion here is better than doing it via a WP:AFD discussion. Ravensfire (talk) 13:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with the proposal to merge the Institute's article into the parent university's article here. Accordingly, I today replaced all the primary source references and replaced them with independent third party references at the Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University article. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Mohi-ud-Din Islamic Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences]] into [[Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University]] 

message: General details
Facilities
Educational systems
Staff 2402:AD80:F0:6DDD:1:0:AC30:532D (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohi-ud-Din Islamic University
Talk:Chevrolet Aerovette

message: I noticed that there was no article on the Aerovette concept car, so I created one. Let me know if there are any problems with it. :) -- TheSlyFox 03:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It needs images of all the revisions it has been through. Bizzybody (talk) 16:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more images.
Talk:Illinois Appellate Court

message: I recognize this page is a bit short, but I will add more detail to it as time goes by.  --Eastlaw 03:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry Littlefield

message: AFAIC figure out, the intention of the ref is to establish the validity of the page numbers:
:"Introduction by Susan Wolstenholme" to Oxford University Press, 1997 ed. of the novel. . "...during the first wave of serious Baum criticism, an influential essay by Littlefield..."  p. xxvi 
(I have clarified it above, BTW, to reflect that the ISBN is not for a book version of the Littlefield article.) Wolstenholme's assessment could be of interest in the text, but the quote suggests there are better sources, on which she relied. I've replaced that citation with a more valuable one to his article.--Jerzy•t 08:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolstenholme ref
Talk:Cashion, Arizona

message: I was told that my hometown prior to it being residential, was a Ostrich farm ! I've read this before, but cannot seem to verify this anymore by doing a search . Why has the information been erased from Cashion history ? Steveerly4u (talk) 05:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cashion Arizona before residential. A Ostrich farm ?
Talk:WRNJ

message: I don't see how the section about WRAN is relevant, because WRAN and WRNJ were two completely different radio stations that were both on the air at the same time, and to a certain extent were competitors. The only thing they have in common is that WRNJ now transmits on WRAN's former frequency. Otherwise WRAN should be given its own Wikipedia article if it is deemed to be important enough.
173.54.235.79 (talk) 21:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree-WRAN should have its own page at WRAN (defunct).Stereorock (talk) 00:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

message: I've attempted improving this article, and have come up against a newcomer editor who keeps reverting my good faith edits. For example: I've removed the programming section per WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, removed non-notable (no Wikipedia article establishing notability) names from the notable former personalities list, and been reverted. It seems the editor may have an undeclared WP:COI. I would appreciate assistance from any experienced editors or administrators on WP:WPRS   ,  who can help resolve this dispute. - BlueboyLINY (talk) 01:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article 

message: I suspect a troll account is selectively reverting edits. Requesting mods to monitor and take curative action against this user if needed. --Vipersage (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch for post vandalism
Talk:WWHK (AM)

message: changed on 4/23/2018: Link to FCC Call Sign History  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadioTheodric (talk • contribs) 17:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call sign changed to WWHK 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WRN (AM). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WRN (AM)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Million Woman March

message: What exactly is "Sistahood", as mentioned in the current revision of this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.225.76 (talk) 23:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Genesee (AOG-8)

message: The decom section didn't make sense to me (struck June 1992, transferred to Chile same day, decom by Chile in January 1992), so I poked around the Naval Vessel Register and found :
:Status: Disposed of through the Security Assistance Program (SAP), transferred, Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) Section 519, Southern Region Amendment
:Date status changed: 11/09/1987
Is that the missing piece of the puzzle? Maralia 03:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer/Decommissioning
Talk:Herbert Spencer (graphic designer)

message: The book has near-zero notability (and no independent sources at all); Spencer is notable, the article on him is very short. Merge makes sense, for now at least. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Pioneers of Modern Typography]] 

message: There are other famous people called "Herbert Spencer", perhaps most famously the English philosopher Herbert Spencer (1820-1903). Shouldn't there be a disambiguation tag heading this article?Vorbee (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Washburn-Fair Oaks Mansion District

message: We're missing photos of a couple houses in the district.--Appraiser (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the contributing houses to the NRHP district are now named and illustrated. -McGhiever (talk) 03:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: I have removed the J.S. Kingmen house because I cannot verify the entry. The section read:
The J.S. Kingmen House, at 2022 Second Avenue South, is a 2.7 story Shingle Style house built in 1883. It was the residence of James Thayer Gerould during his tenure as librarian at the University of Minnesota.
Gerould is attested, the address is within the district, and the date is plausible for Shingle style, but "2.7 story" piqued my interest, and I cannot find anything substantiating this house. The text was added on 13 April 2010 by an editor whose only other edit (unless some have been deleted) was changing it from "K.S." to "J.S." Here it is for restoration (with the number of floors corrected) if it is in an offline source or one Google isn't showing me. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  J.S. Kingmen house