lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Commons category-inline

message: At the bottom of the article titled Chlorine dioxide under "External links", the first time says "Media related to Chlorine dioxide at Wikimedia Commons". The capitalization of the initial "C" in "chlorine" appears to be inconsistent with the conventions of WP:MOS, so I clicked on "edit" and found this:  I had not seen this template before. Can and should this template be edited to fix this? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a bug: it's an inherent ambiguity of the article title. The Lua code cannot know whether the article title is a proper noun or not, so it simply uses the capitalized form. This has been true for many years. For any article where the title is not a proper noun and shouldn't be capitalized, you can supply a second parameter to the template to display the correct form. set . I've fixed Chlorine dioxide. — hike395 (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

text: It triggered Pi bot because the category is not "Category:photographs by Violet Keene", it's "Category:Photographs by Violet Keene". I changed the page to use , which I think is what you were looking for? —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think so, essentially.  I just don't understand why  is a problem when (I thought) MediaWiki was capitalization-agnostic.  Thank you very much for the assist, regardless!  —  Fourthords | =Λ= | 21:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: A bug in this template

message: I would like to suggest combining this template with the multi-category abilities of , without the need to create a separate :Template:Commons category multi-inline (similarly,  and  may also be combined). As the 2= parameter of  is currently being used for a label, I would suggest renaming it to label1=, and so forth.
The reason for this request may be exampled with the Teddy (garment) article referring to both teddy and camiknickers for the same garment, while currently they are separate commons sub-categories (Category:Teddy and Category:Camiknickers); see also Category talk:Women's underwear#Disorganized subcats for a related discussion. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 21:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I solved the problem on Teddy by merging the categories on Commons, which is probably the best solution in most cases. However I support your proposal in general. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an interesting idea. I am deactivating this edit request, since there does not appear to be an actionable code-change request here. If someone gets something working in the sandbox of one of these templates, feel free to reactivate the request. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 18 February 2024
Talk:Step on It! (1922 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Placement of hatnotes atop main title headers that carry parenthetical qualifiers is discouraged per WP:NAMB. In the case at hand, if the headers for the two films were fully disambiguated, per nomination, there would be no need for hatnotes. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 April 2023
Talk:Video tolling

message: I've done a request to merge video tolling and Videomaut. Maut (German) is toll (English). Here the same subject is being treated. Davin7 (talk) 10:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a thrid one, describing the samen: Telepass. Davin7 (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it makes sense to move the Videomaut article into this one. I just took a stab at integrating the article and removing some information that was related to the Austrian system of toll roads in general, but of no particular relevance to Videomaut. Regarding the Telepass article (I also wrote that one), I don't believe it should be merged, as Telepass is not a video tolling system. It operates with On-Board Units only and is more comparable to EZ-Pass than to general video tolling. Markus Stamm (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition to merging the Videomaut article, I also slightly changed the structure of the existing information so the general information related to Video tolling technology is presented first, and region-specific sections follow. Perhaps it is too early, but I suggest the "stub" template could even be removed. Markus Stamm (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Susanna

message: Here it is in hebrew:Susanna (Shoshanna) daughter of Elam :
www.daat.ac.il/daat/hasfarim/hayovlim/8.htm
or:
www.daat.co.il/daat/hasfarim/hayovlim/8.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.125.68.40 (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Padarn

message: Frankly, I think seven footnotes in such a brief article is perfectly sufficient. We can't run about in dismay every time some joker posts a "more references" tag. --Wetman (talk) 10:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the number of sections gave the false impression that the article was longer? Pehaps some of them need to be merged? And where is Letia? Srnec (talk) 21:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

text: How's that, Srnec? A redirect to Armorica: it's the same region. Perhaps occurences of Letia should be collected and worked into a short section at Armorica. Or am I being dense and missing something? --Wetman (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's I who's missing something (namely footnote 6). If there is a significance to the use of "Letia" in preference to "Armorica" then a short section at the latter may be useful. Was it an archaism even in the Dark Ages? Dark Age authors love their archaisms... (And it looks like some information at Litavis could belong at Armorica also.) Srnec (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Object: These are two different people. Walgamanus (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merger

message: Regarding this article and Paternus, please see Category_talk:Saints_articles_needing_attention#Padarn_and_Paternus. Carminowe of Hendra (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Padarn/Paternus
Talk:Eccyclema

message: The difference is one of transliterated "k" or Latinized "c", not of content. They must be merged. There should be some discussion on whether one ought to mix the transliterated "k" with the Latinized "y" (instead of the transliterated "u", "ekkuklema" or "eccyclema" should be preferred to "ekkyklema").rmagill 16:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "y" is the standard lower-case transliteration in English of the Greek lower-case 'ipsilon' because the capital letter for 'ipsilon' in Greek is "Y", not "U", making it obvious that the lowercase in English should be the same letter as the upper-case, not a different one for each. Mike Hayes (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  They absolutely must be merged
Talk:Anne Lewis

message: Page should be integrated into Robocop page. QuantumG (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've redirected the page to the first film in which she appears, on the basis that this article lacks third-party citations and an assertion/evidence of real-world notability. --EEMIV (talk) 13:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Anyone have a citation for this?: "Nancy Allen, by this point was fully aware of the concept of franchise milking, and only offered to reprise her popular role if she were to be killed off during the first half of the movie." 74.185.135.72 (talk) 02:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:Jean Pierre Reguerraz

message: The current photograph is not free, poor quality and taken from a film. It should be replaceable by something better as Argentina has only a 25 year post-publication copyright term for pictures so: anything published in 1971 or earlier is in the public domain in Argentina and the USA I think; anything published in 1984 or earlier is in the public domain in Argentina. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 14:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Year 7

message: Years Seven is stated, in Australia, as being the 8th compulsory year - whilst Year Six is stated as being only thé 6th compulsory year. In other words children must do a compulsory year after leaving Primary School and before starting Secondary School, without ageing, presumably by some kind of miracle on Christmas Day.
If I am not mistaken, the first year of Primary School, officially known as Preperatory Class but universally referred to as Preps (or else Bubs, as un Babies', by the children), is NOT compulsory although treated as such with few exceptions. Real compulsory Primary School starts as Year One (formerly First Grade) and is this is the normal class level for 6 year old children (legal compulsory schooling age). Preps serves to assure adequate "pre-school" base level for all children. Since access to pre-school facilities is neither compulsory nor garanteed, Preps is not very academic but rather focuses on social interaction, class conduct and very basic writing, drawing and counting skills.
I believe that Year Seven through Year Twelve, in Australia (formerly First Form through Sixth Form), should be noted as the 7th through 12th compulsory years, and that Preps should be documented as the non-compulsory, but usual, starting class in Primary School.
In accordance with Wikipedia ethics, documented source material will be required (even when facts are known to be correct).
Neil Dewhurst, Lyon, France. (talk) 10:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Count of Compulsury Years ?

message: I have reverted the dates in the table to refer to UK ages to maintain consistency with other year group articles. I have also started a discussion at the schools WikiProject about how best to move forward with articles of this sort. Please do contribute. Tafkam (talk) 11:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The greece section is biased and should be removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.17.233.111 (talk) 02:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greece Section 

message: Why isn't this article merged with Seventh grade? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the difference with [[Seventh grade]]?
Talk:Year 6

message: I have reverted the dates in the table to refer to UK ages to maintain consistency with other year group articles. I have also started a discussion at the schools WikiProject about how best to move forward with articles of this sort. Please do contribute. Tafkam (talk) 11:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency ([[Obsessive–compulsive disorder|hobgoblin]])
Talk:Helpless When She Smiles

message: Does anybody know what version of the single the Rock Remix is on?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cougars2012 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: =
Talk:Alice Gomme

message: Alice Gomme's husband was a folklorist and administrator of considerable achievement; see http://www.answers.com/topic/george-laurence-gomme for a good account of him and the lack of an article is rather surprising (though requested two years ? ago according to Requested articles/biog listings) The contents of 'Singing Games' were originally planned as a mere part of an encyclopaedic work on folklore according to Georgina Boyes at http://www.mustrad.org.uk/articles/gomme.htm: the plan was Laurence Gomme's and the content would be from both of them  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix Folio Secundus (talk • contribs) 12:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zélia Duncan

message: Normally I wouldn't write a "thank you" in this discussion section, but this is an exception. The 2007 photo is really fantastic. If you want to check how NOT to do it, see the WP:PT article :pt:Zélia Duncan. She is now 47, but has been pictured in a shape so exhausted that she might as well go for a 62-year-old woman on that 2012 photo. I can't write this sort of "complaint" into the discussion section of the PT article, because my Portuguese vocabulary is ridiculously small. Sorry about that. -andy 77.190.22.108 (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for the photo.
Talk:Sangkae River

message: No discussion happened about the article merge and the ugly merge template is bigger than the article. So, I've been bold and merged Stung Sangker River here and turned it into a redirect. Incidentally "Stung" is river in the Khmer language, so the other article name was a misnomer. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 13:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Merge
Talk:EABA

message: released in 2013, as a PDF download.  Uses some great functionality of PDF with things like pop-up menus and dice rolling right in the file. Can also be printed and used as a standard RPG. Review here:  http://notthesingularity.com/3962/btrc-does-it-again-with-eabav2-excellence-meets-realism/ Allegrorondo (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  EABA v2
Talk:Circuit des Nations

message: Should this Grand Prix of Nations point (redirect) to this circuit page, I think there is no need for new page?— Typ932T | C  11:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --— Typ932T | C  13:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect Grand Prix to circuit page
Talk:Speed skating

message: It appears the overview section is talking solely about short track, but the article is about speed skating in general.
I deleted the first paragraph and moved one sentence to the history section. 77.163.66.6 (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Overview' section confusing 

message: ok my cousin Derek Parra is a spped skater he took home gold and silver (i think) in 2002 in the 1500 and 5000. hes awsome!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.148.49.92 (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: I have added some extremely relevant information which was missing from the history section, why it was missing I have no idea but anyway, I have spread the previous entry into the chronological timeline.Twobells (talk) 11:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: HISTORY EDITS

message: The article states that the National Ice Skating Assocation organized the first official race in 1763.  However, according to the information on the page accessed by the National Ice Skating Association link, the organization wasn't formed until 1879. 205.143.204.110 (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence is still in the article. -- KWiki (talk) 11:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: National Ice Skating Assocation

message: I think the header says it all. It would improve the article. Simyou (talk) 14:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible addition of rules section? 

message: In Equipment, it says "skaters wear smooth ceramic or carbon fiber tips on the left hand grove to reduce friction" is that meant to be glove not grove? I'm pretty sure but grove could be some technical term???˥ Ǝ Ʉ  H Ɔ I Ɯ (talk) 01:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glove/grove?
Talk:List of Charlton Comics publications

message: I stumbled across this list, becuase of my interest in Underdog (TV series).  Since I have an updated copy of the Comics Buyers Guide, I will update what I can, based on what is already here, and remove the expanded tag when I'm done. Fortdj33 (talk) 03:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RING finger domain

message: I just moved the acronym into the first sentence, along with the refs. Richard☺Decal (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know,  think it was better with the acronym further down. RING doesn't really mean anything or add to anyone's understanding - It just makes things more confusing. Abergabe (talk) 22:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback, I'm new to Wikipedia. I thought that the first line of articles were supposed to give its full name even if it is commonly known by its abbreviation? e.g. DED or APC2. Richard☺Decal (talk) 23:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I checked the lead section style guide and it looks like the convention is to define the abbreviation in the lead sentence. Richard☺Decal (talk) 23:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But the fifth and final rule of wikipedia is to break the rules =P If it were anything with a useful acronym, I would entirely agree with you, but where the acronym is really just a matter of trivia, it just seems messy to put it in the opening. Abergabe (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I think this might read better, what do you think? Abergabe (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer to have the current style of RING (realling interesting new gene) finger domain in this case. But thanks Richard☺Decal for working on these pages. We appreciate help from new people :)  Alexbateman (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I agree that the new version is much better. I didn't know how tightly we are supposed to follow convention. Richard☺Decal (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is a non-ASCII art schematic available? Intelligentsium 16:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll hopefully get onto making something. Because I find ASCII art charmingly anachronistic, I'll paste it below for the record. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 05:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schematic
Talk:Runcinidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 16:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:George Rex

message: Further to the above, how exactly were they disproved? What exactly is the "Royal marker"? This article reads like POV and OR.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.159.105 (talk) 10:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disproved 

message: It appears to me that we're talking about two different George Rex's. if you read the description of George Rex Genealogy, ot says G.R. Moved to Pennsylvania and had 12 children with a wife. The birth year is different by 15 years. I think the person talked about in this article is different from the one in the 'Royal Blood' portion. Anyone want to confirm that?
https://books.google.com/books/about/George_Rex_genealogy.html?id=tR9MAAAAMAAJ
EDIT: Not sure whats with the books description, but it does appear that the Wikipedia article is right after further investigation.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B157:F8AC:C4C5:5A50:7BBB:B13F (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  There may be a problem here.  

message: Hello, 8th generation direct descendant of George Rex here, from the USA. I've stumbled upon on issue regarding which I cannot find any information. If anyone has read The George Rex Genealogy that book refers to George Rex, the rumored first son of George III and Hannah Lightfoot, who lived in America and had a wife and children here. This Wikipedia article, as well as a very informative documentary made by the late Kennith Griffith, a recording of which can be found on youtube, discusses George Rex, rumored first son of GIII and HL, who lived in Knysna, and had different children, a different partner, and a different life altogether. After GR's birth, there seems to be two different people entirely based on who you ask. Both stories come from credible sources in my opinion, and here's the kicker: the book has a picture of George Rex's grave, in Pennsylvania if I recall correctly, whereas the documentary has KG standing next to the grave of George Rex in Knysna, South Africa! If anyone has insight into what this is all about, it would be much appreciated. Please feel free to post any info here as I will check back from time to time. Thanks all!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1300:C6B7:8427:AC3C:3629:79A2 (talk) 02:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Different George Rex's
Talk:Martin Špegelj

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Brachypylina

message: This thing looks so weird, seriously, what the hell? Does it swim? Are those tentacles or legs? Why does it look like that? Is its mouth on the bottom or on a side of it? Are there any photographs of it? This is Brachypylina on a pillow: https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.812539290.2351/throwpillow,36x36,1000x-bg,f8f8f8-c,0,200,1000,1000.u3.jpg --User123o987name (talk) 08:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wtf
Talk:Mohammad Sadli

message: according to the source he died in the hospital, otherwise it would be litte odd that a hispital spokeswoman tells the press about his death. after he "relinguished" his post as minister he became member of kadin - according to antara - not the other way around. cheers --80.30.88.3 (talk) 12:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Cd loudness trend-something.gif

message: Wouldn't it be nice to tell to what song this waveform represents?  Hatulim (talk) 12:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The song is "Something" by the Beatles. I didn't create this image, but I think the 1983 version is from a Japanese bootleg CD, which I seem to recall reading about when the official CDs came out in 1987. I remember the writer of the article said the bootleg sounded better, and now that I see this image, I understand why. The bootleg sounded better because it has more dynamic range. I think the article that I read may have been in High Fidelity magazine, but I'm not sure. Grundle2600 (talk) 21:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the 2000 one from the album One (Beatles album). Surly it is. Daniel Christensen (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

message: It would be great to list what sound editing software was used to create this image in the image description.  Thanks! Audiophile1 (talk) 04:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Program used to create this image 

message: I notice this has not been updated to include the 2009 remaster of Abbey Road.  However, it appears this would somewhat undercut the point of the article: the new remaster is 2-3dB quieter than the 2000 one.  Still much louder than the other three though. R42 (talk) 12:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 remaster