lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arigna

message: We already have a List of townlands of County Roscommon, and a :Category:Townlands of County Roscommon. We could have a Townlands of Arigna (similar to Townlands of Kilcommon in Mayo) with a link from this article. The current list/wall of text, presented as the first/primary section is a distraction from the subject, in my opinion. RashersTierney (talk) 02:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Townlands

message: Really need a citation for this at Arigina as not obvious on the target.  http://dbo.ie/coal-mining/coal-mining-article-2 might be helpful.  Need to ensure the article is using it in the correct context.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  culm
Talk:Ballintober, County Roscommon

message: Ballintober, County Roscommon, is 6 kilometers from the town of Castlerea. It contains a reasonably well preserved remains of a stone castle first mentioned in writing in 1311. It is not recorded who built the castle, but the builders may either be the Normans, or the O'Conor family who ruled Connaught at various times during the last two millennia. It is said that King Cathal O'Connor called for an abbey to be built at Ballintubber. However, his workers built the abbey at Ballintubber, Co. Roscommon and not Ballintubber, County Mayo. When O'Connor discovered this, he ordered that a greater and grander abbey be built in the correct Ballintubber, located in Co. Mayo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptullyrich (talk • contribs) 16:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle
Talk:Ballyfarnon

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Sunlight Beyond The Grave, by Michael Kelly https://books.google.com/books?id=5fLgDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT43. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Declangi (talk) 20:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Keadue

message: Hi,
Random Article clicking (my way of random browsing) brought me here to this entry, and I noticed the last paragraph to be repeated. Can I go ahead and remove the repeatition? Or could some of the admins do it?
--jmd.aKBar (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Knockcroghery

message: The history section has sucked up most of the other sections over time and has become unwieldy, with lots of subsections. Most of it need not be in a history section at all.
The first subsection is not historical at all, and only deals with the terrain and name of the village. I propose that the first and third subsections be broken out into their own section, titled "name", because they deal with the original name and change of name of the village.
I suggest that the second subsection more appropriately belongs under "events and popular culture", because it deals with a cultural event that gave rise to a common expression. 2A01:B340:61:4D19:B1D2:2C89:4AE5:D116 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Goalkeeper glove

message: I am again removing the content about goalkeeper gloves in Spain. While it may be true, there are a few things wrong with both the content it's self and the way it is presented. This information is far to specific and isolated for the stage this article is in right now. It is more about charity then about goalkeeper gloves, in the article about books it doesn't talk about notable donations of books. Then, I'm not comfortable about comparing a donation of goalkeeper gloves to a religious event that involves food and a religious icon. and, while Francisco Javier Sánchez Broto was sometimes known as "God" I think it was not so literal. Cheers -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing content about "goalkeeper gloves in spain" 

message: For the proposed merger please see here--Lucy-marie (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger
Talk:The Public (play)

message: DionysosProteus 01:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to English translation of title, in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)|wikipedia standard convention on naming of articles]] 

message: Almost all recent scholarship agrees that it is incorrect to classify El público as surrealist. See, amongst several others:
* Jerez-Farrán, Carlos. 'La estética expresionista en El público de García Lorca', ALEC 11.1-2 (1986), pp.111-127. 
* Morris, C. Brian (ed.). The Surrealist Adventure in Spain (Ottowa: Dovehouse, 1991) [Andrew Anderson's chapter; I forget the exact title]
* Boalch, Nicholas. Opening the Theatre beneath the Sand (Durham: University of Durham, 2005)
Martínez Nadal, in his analysis of the play which appeared with the original edition, surveys the question and considers the avant-garde groups of Madrid and Barcelona as a much greater influence than French Surrealism, eventually concluding that Lorca 'no sólo quedaría al margen sino en declarada oposición al movimiento'. 
Lorca forcibly rejected being called a Surrealist on numerous occasions and disclaimed a wide selection of common Surrealist techniques. Writing with specific reference to El público, he wrote that 'los credos, las escuelas estéticas, no me preocupan. No tengo ningún interés en ser antiguo o moderno, sino ser yo, natural.'
--ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\talk 00:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surrealist? 

message: The play was actually published for the first time in 1958 as "The Audience" in Evergreen Review #6, perhaps someone should change this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.215.15.93 (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe that's right - it may have excerpted a couple of scenes, but it wasn't published until the 70s. The manuscript only returned to Nadal's possession in '58. DionysosProteus 17:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication Date
Talk:Nippert Stadium

message: the picture on this page is not a picture of the stadium but rather of a scale model of the stadium. Ideally, somebody would have access to a public domain photograph of the actual stadium.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.28.250.194 (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 
Talk:Bill Snyder Family Football Stadium

message: * The "Family" needs to be removed from the title.  On the official website, it's listed without the Family.  Check it out:Official Site
** I think maybe you meant "Football," because the site you referenced calls it the "Bill Snyder Family Stadium."  In any event, the final word goes to the Kansas Board of Regents, and they say it is officially the Bill Snyder Family Football Stadium.  So, I believe the title of the article is accurate. -Kgwo1972 (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Portuguese words of Italian origin

message: Please stop removing words from the list. Almost ALL the Italian words come from Latin, so if you continue in your destructive work, eventually only a few will stand. Please consult my source. Dictionaries in Portuguese I have consulted indicate when they come through Italian, so this is the standard among ethymologists. --R.Sabbatini 01:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fojnica

message: It is an outrage to every Christian of Fojnica, that the author of this article claims that the Fransiscans of Fojnica are considered by the muslim-population as true patriots.
I strongly advise the author of this article to do some better research on the municapility of Fojnica, as the ENTIRE CHRISTIAN POPULATION of FOJNICA was expulsed, raped and murdered by the Bosnian muslem army, during the war between Croats and Muslems. The Catholic cross on the Zec-mountain nearby Fojnica has been destroyed and the nuns-monastery pillaged, the church shelled and out of 6000 Catholics, only 70 people stayed alongside 7 Fransiscans in the Monastery. Thank God, they survived. All this happened from the 3th may 1993 to 16 july 1993, when the last offensive was launched by the muslem-forces.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.83.224.239 (talk) 23:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fransiscans of Fojnica Bosnian patriots ??? 
Talk:Get Smart! (band)

message: An RfC was opened on a redirect talk page, at Talk:Get Smart!#RfC for the address of redirect, that has important implications for the names of the articles presently at Get Smart and Get Smart! (band), and treatment of Get Smart (disambiguation). — SMcCandlish    Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib.  18:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on article names 
Talk:Los Angeles Times bombing

message: Just FYI:  May Day is not generally celebrated in the U.S.  The American holiday is Labor Day, celebrated the first Monday in September.  They are not synonymous in the U.S., and never have been.  The article should say Labor Day, and point to Labor Day (United States). - Tim1965 12:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: May Day vs. Labor Day

message: "The next morning, unexploded bombs were discovered at the homes of Otis and F.J. Zeehandelaar, secretary of the M&M...." is part of the list of unexploded bombs that were found on October 2.  Did Otis and F.J. Zeehandelaar live in multiple homes (i.e., Otis lives in one house and F.J. lives in another)?   Were they both the secretary of the M&M?  If so, shouldn't that read "secretaries?"  What is the relationship between Otis and F.J.?   Are they brothers, which would explain the "homes"?  It's written like F.J. could be the wife of Otis.  Jtyroler (talk) 21:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zeehandelaar

message: POV text and weaselry rv. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *You added a neutrality tg.  If you feel there are remaining issues, then you need to point them out here so that they may be fixed.  Barring no discussion here, the tag should be removed. - Tim1965 (talk) 14:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

text: That doesn't mean it is POV.  Perhaps they were convicted on circumstantial evidence.  That's entirely legal. For it to be POV, the article would have to explicitly have ignored sources that discussed the physical evidence of the trial. Identify those sources, and you have an argument it's POV. - Tim1965 (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I restored those words concerning the preparation of the Vanderbilt Cup extra because it explains why there were so many people in the building at that time.  Without it, there would have been far fewer casualties.  Motorsportmemorial.org is not a personal Web site (in particular, it is not mine), and it is respected as a well-researched site among the auto racing community.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Cornutt (talk • contribs) 21:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanderbilt Cup 

message: Why not include the motive behind the bombing?  Why isn't this basic information already covered in the current version of this article?  173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is covered. Read the whole thing. Anastrophe (talk) 05:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomprehensible
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 2

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines.
I was also appalled at your re-count of Steve Martin's hosting job. - Spyke1077 02:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The reasons given for Chevy Chase leaving the series, as given in the introduction, was given without sourcing and worded in such a dubious fashion that I have removed it pursuant to WP:BLP. 68.146.80.110 (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit for [[WP:BLP]]

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 1

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. - Spyke1077 02:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 

message: Are there any articles on WP where I can find the parodies and satires that were performed during each episode or at least each season? I'm going in circles following links. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody & satire? 

message: He was in several S1 episodes (and not just background). He deserves the “only 1 episode” removed after his name. 216.252.9.43 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Coe
Talk:Davis Wade Stadium

message: Quickie history of the DPR for future editors of the Davis-Wade page here. The DPR was originally done on the field by the kickoff team. Usually, the captain of the KO team would stand in front of the rest of the team, and would "direct" the DPR, while the other 10 members would mirror his actions.
Once the SEC ruled that the (on field) DPR was "taunting" the other teams, the team was forced to do the DPR from the sidelines. At the pep rally the week before the next game, the football team taught the assembled student body how to do the DPR. The first game after this ruling is where the first appearance of Chuck Smooth's version of Who Let the Dogs Out occurred. This particular game, the Famous Maroon Band (FMB) was on the field, and WLTDO was played over the PA system, and the FMB did the DPR on the field, while most of the student body performed it in the stands. After this, the DPR was performed by the entire football team, on the sidelines, to WLTDO. During the Peach Bowl that year, the DPR was changed by having the non-kickoff team members falling down on the sidelines at the end of the DPR. Watching Joe Lee Dunn do the DPR in bare feet was, to say the least, interesting...
NOTE: non-conference games were the exception - the DPR was still done on the field, mostly.
Hope this helps
MHaz1701 (talk) 23:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dog Pound Rock

message: change "Davis Wade Stadium, officially known as Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field" to "Matt Corral Stadium at Lane Train Field" Hottytoddy610 (talk) 03:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 03:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2021
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 3

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines.
And by the way, everything after the first sentence in this article's page was awful and totally wrong for Wikipedia. - Spyke1077 02:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 

message: The Sex Pistols was not "denied visas to enter America" as seen on this page, they choose not to perform at snl - instead perform just concerts in USA (read New York Times here - https://www.nytimes.com/1977/12/31/archives/sex-pistols-are-given-visas-to-enter-us-for-concerts-controversial.html?searchResultPosition=124   and here https://www.nytimes.com/1977/12/16/archives/the-pop-life-joni-mitchell-is-still-going-her-own-way.html?searchResultPosition=115Sergey Woropaew (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex Pistols
Talk:County Route 74 (Rockland County, New York)

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
Talk:Saturday Night Live season 4

message: To Connerb312: I have edited your articles because they do not meet the encyclopedic styles of Wikipedia. Please take more consideration and effort into your articles, and review them carefully for spelling/grammar mistakes or non-sensical statements. Please focus more on general ideas than specifics, and please do not write articles like you are re-counting a personal story or a fairy tale. This will help to meet Wikipedia's guidelines.
- Spyke1077 02:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems