lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Widget

message: It doesn't seem to meet WP:SOFT and if we want to explain anything in detail about it it would need to be in project space anyways. JoshuaZ 20:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article back to Wikipedia namespace.  This is a tool for use by Wikipedia editors.  We don't want in mainspace, where notability requirements apply.  Wikipedia namespace is where many other tools reside.  WP:SOFT is irrelevant; that has to do with core wikimedia software, not tools.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 01:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this here? 

message: The external link for this widget is down. This page appears active but unrelated. - Shiftchange (talk) 22:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ext. link
Talk:The Reynolds Girls

message: Please note that they were called THE Reynolds Girls, not just Reynolds Girls. This is confirmed on the cover of their single. 80.47.16.39 (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: article moved. Rodhullandemu 20:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The record "I'd Rather Jack" is actually very catchy and better than a lot of others around at the time in 1989. It's very recognisably SA&W though, but none the worse for it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.115.127 (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Hot and cool media

message: Agree with the proposed merger of this stub into Marshall McLuhan - all material that was here is in that article where it appropriately belongs.  This is McLuhan's concept, closely associated with him.   The readable prose on the McLuhan piece is not excessive, so there is no reason for this fork-off.  A redirect is in order.Tvoz |talk 20:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:Bethnal Green railway station

message: I can't find a reference for this so haven't included it in the main article but the station  used to be called "Bethnal Green Junction" and had platforms on the Great Eastern Line towards Stratford and Liverpool Street. There is still an extent platform on the east bound GEL 62.49.61.203 20:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry thought I was still signed in Wilmot1 20:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Name 

message: I have added a section on the history of this station based on the history given at [British History online] Wilmot1 13:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief History added
Talk:The Records

message: We appear to have two articles about The Records, as the Wicks article is pretty much all about this band. Merging seems an obvious outcome.--Michig (talk) 06:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The puffery in the Wicks article could be toned down a bit too. Piriczki (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

text: I see your point but could there be one article that diverges at some point chronologically, with a post-1982 section covering the individual members' careers? Just for the sake of keeping everything related to the Records in one place and making it one very good article. More balance might be needed though. Piriczki (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I also disagree with a merge.  There were some formatting errors on the page (along with the above comment) and I added some additional sources that show Wicks had a viable career as a solo.  Obviously The Records was the height of his career, but it was not the only thing. Trackinfo (talk) 22:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[John Wicks (singer)]] 

message: The Records appear to be touring again as John Wicks and the Records and have a current website. IMO they are no longer defunct. I guess the question is whether or not it is essentially the same band. Thoughts from others on the status? Bahooka (talk) 16:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's been the case for years. It was previously discussed above that this article refers the original group that existed from 1978–82. For "John Wicks and the Records" see John Wicks (singer). Piriczki (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification. Bahooka (talk) 16:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are versus Were 
Talk:Autonomia Operaia

message: To say that It was the first time since Bava Beccaris that the police forces used such violent means in order to repress a demonstration in Italy is total, utter idiocy.
Ever heard of the "Morti di Reggio Emilia" (1960), of the dead workers at Avola, Battipaglia (1968),  of the land occupations by farmers in the late '40s and '50s (tens of dead) of the clashes after the murder attempt against Togliatti in July 1948 - tens of dead communist demonstrators in clashes with the police in Naples, Genua, Leghorn, Taranto etc etc etc (Giordaano)
The new text is not an improvement. It is entirely based one one source only, and contains many personal, unsourced judgements and unbalanced  appraisals. Not an encyclopedia article, but rather a political analysis.
Finally, why all this bold type ? (Giordaano)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giordaano (talk • contribs) 08:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It is to be distinguish between:
* Autonomia operaria (:wikidata:Q96146823)
„Die Wurzeln der Autonomia liegen in der militanten Arbeiterbewegung der 1960er Jahre, die in engem Zusammenhang mit dem Begriff der Arbeiterautonomie (autonomia operaia) und der Theorie des Operaismus steht.“ (:de:Autonomia#Autonomia Operaia)
„L'origine du « mouvement » se place d'abord d'un point de vue théorique autour de la réflexion entreprise sur la nouvelle composition ouvrière en utilisant entre autres l'enquête de terrain : revue Quaderni Rossi (1er numéro en septembre 1961) animée entre autres par un sociologue du PCI Raniero Panzieri. En 1964, Mario Tronti, Antonio Negri et Romanio Alquati fondent une nouvelle revue Classe Operaia. Cette revue mène un travail sur la transformation de la classe ouvrière italienne et l'arrivée massive de jeunes ouvriers immigrés de l'intérieur (Sud Italien = Mezzogiorno) qui vont modifier et sa composition et renouveler les méthodes de lutte dans les entreprises, peu d'entre eux étant syndiqués.“ (:fr:Mouvement_autonome_en_Italie#L'origine)
„La reivindicació de l’autonomia dels treballadors experimentà un ressorgiment, a França i Itàlia, arran dels esdeveniments del maig del 68, sobretot a través de l’actualitat de l’operaisme italià, inspirat per Toni Negri, Asor Rosa i Mario Tronti i representada per organitzacions com Potere Operaio, Lotta Continua i Autonomia Operaia.“ (:ca:Autonomia proletària)
and
* Autonomia (Q6439582) ("Italian leftist movement particularly active from 1976 to 1978.")
The second movement follows the first movement (or is the second stage of a longer process/development) and both are related (intimate); neverless the must be distinguish. In any case "Autonomia operaria" must not be reduced to "movement [...] active from 1976 to 1978".
--Nstrc (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title is totally misleading
Talk:Utica, Tunisia

message: I like the organization and use of headings in this article.  My two suggestions: In the opening paragraph, it may be helpful to mention the status of Utica today, in the present, for those who use the first paragraphs as summaries.  Mentioning that it no longer exists and the location of its ruins could be a nice addition.  Second: In the caption under the picture, you might add "Utica is located on the upper right-hand coast in this map."  Something like that to say where it is and tie the map into the rest of the article.  -ZLS 15 May 2007 3:53PM CT
It seems very thorough and the sections display the chronology of the city while also depicting its relationship with Carthage and Rome. You do a great job of highlighting the main points within battles and how it impacted Utica. The only thing I would edit would be the direct quotes. Perhaps cite, but paraphrase more instead of directly quoting. You have one section that is almost all direct quotations. Other than that, the information is concise and the layout is very direct and thorough.
VinaChhaya 20:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

message: :Image:Africa Romana.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Africa Romana.gif
Talk:Unemployment benefits in Italy

message: This is part of an essay of mine about "The unemployment insurance systems in Sweden and Italy", Sodertorns Hogskola, Huddinge (Sweden), march 2007--Dans-eng 21:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://wikipreneurship.eu/index.php5?title=Marcora_Law 81.158.229.42 (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This?

message: I find that the conclusion is NNPOV because is single-source based and not based upon a thorough comparison of unemployement benefit systems or an objective scales. The fact that unemployement benefits are mostly enjoyed by older workers is a consequence of the general pattern of employement in Italy, not of a bias of the system, which is age-neutral 151.96.3.241 (talk) 09:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/industrial-relations-law-and-regulation/italy-reforms-to-system-of-unemployment-benefits  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.68.97 (talk) 02:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  out dated here is update of 2015
Talk:Cubavision International

message: At least according to Spanish Wikipedia and Cuban official sources.
thumb|left|150px|
This is still the current logo of Cubavisión Internacional, according to both the Spanish Wikipedia and the ICRT's Televisión Cubana web site.
However, as there is now an SVG version of the logo, this should be used in place of the JPEG file.  (The JPEG file, instead, could be shown as a variant of the same logo.)
thumb|left|180px|
This is actually the logo of the domestic Cubavisión service - NOT Cubavisión Internacional, as stated in the current article - though on the ICRT's Televisión Cubana website, the stylized representation of Cuba in the logo is actually a bit more curvy.
If I have time, I'm actually going to be translating a lot of Spanish Wikipedia articles relating to the ICRT into English, armed with a WRTH and a library copy of Lonely Planet's guidebook to Cuba.
--Daniel Blanchette, 0500, Wednesday, 20 April 2011  —Preceding undated comment added 02:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The logos are wrong for Cubavisión and Cubavisión Internacional 

message: The article say "mainly state propaganda". What is the source of that non neutral affirmation? I have been in Cuba, and many Cuban peoples do receive both the US and the Cuban radio and TV channels (most if not all on the North coast, only the ones with satellite antennas on the south coast). That imply they have both propaganda if you want to call it so.144.85.234.128 (talk) 13:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non neutral POV: State propaganda
Talk:Weekday cartoon

message: Man, I wish those cartoons would come back. Everyeditcounts 21:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatever happened to syndicated cartoons? 

message: First: Damn you congress and your infernal Telecommunications Act of 1996 for stealing from this newest generation childhood memories of innocent afternoon cartoon watching! It's no wonder so many kids are vapid and oversexed.. many were weaned watching talk shows in place of the toons earlier generations were given. Sorry, end rant.. I know, not the place but it was building up for a while. 
Anyhow, as for the article, I like it but I am pretty sure several of the toons listed in the 1960's and 70's are in fact 80's cartoons and several of them didn't hit syndication outside of Saturday mornings till the early 90's (Smurfs and Snorks, for example.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.122.240.167 (talk) 11:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm 

message: Was the author of that section high?  That paragraph was ridiculous. JamesEG (talk) 08:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrote the whole damn thing. Had to be done. Apple8800 (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010s 

message: The article's compass is pointing to the correct destination, but I think a complete overhaul would be great, and slightly more informative in comparison to this current version. I'll give it a shot way later, as I want to use this article as a basis to see if I can compose something that's instructive and informative as to what this "weekday cartoon" was and how we so need to bring it back. Apple8800 (talk) 17:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Intent
Talk:Racing de Casablanca

message: I 've found out that the colours for the club are white, green and blue, but I don't know which colours specifically go on the shirt, socks, shorts etc. If anyone finds out please add! --alexdeangelis86 21:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Team colours
Talk:Companion matrix

message: In the article the companion matrix is defined as a function on the space of polynomials
:
C: K_n[x] \rightarrow K^{n\,\times\,n}
without any mention of it. So, for sake of simplicity I suggest to drop the  notation in favor of .
Further, it could be interesting to extend the section on Diagonalizability to study the effects the change of base in  as well. 213.55.225.91 (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: One could add a sentence that says the above, that C is a function from the polynomial ring to the general linear group, but doing so would implicitly suggest that this map is perhaps a homomorphism of some kind. But it isn't. If you multiply two polynomials, you don't get a product of the matrices. The polynomial ring has a grading, the general linear group doesn't. Stuff like that. But I dunno, maybe I'm missing something basic. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companion matrix or companion morphism?
File talk:JUNE 2006 LAYOUT.PNG

message: I believe part of this diagram to be mistaken. The first havent station, was (a) not a mere 'halt', and (b) located between TWO level crossings - that of New Lane, and one on North Street. When the (first) 'new' havant station opened, it was because the platforms were too short, and the North Street level crossing was removed.
Until that point, for 2000 years havant had been a town on a crossroad-plan (4 roman roads) with a central church. North St was the first to be cut off. Graldensblud 21:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cha-cha-chá (music)

message: As far as I know, Cha Cha Chá has no clave. The bell does not play as the bongo bell does in son, it is the same pattern over all bars, and claves are not used as an instrument. Wasn't the "removal" of clave done on purpose to simplify it for non-Cuban dancers who are not used to the concept of clave? Happily ever after 10:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Clave_%28rhythm%29|Clave]] and instrumentation 

message: I moved this page from Cha-cha-cha (music) to Cha-cha-chá (music). The article uses "cha-cha-chá" exclusively. I expect it was titled the way it was to avoid the accent, but per WP:TSC, it's okay for a page title to contain accents as long as there are redirects that use only standard characters. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 02:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving page
Talk:Harper Adams University

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.harper-adams.ac.uk/about/history.htm. Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. Reg porter (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: Why does Women in Rural Enterprise redirect to this article? There is no mention of the organization in the article - if it redirects here it should at least be mentioned. Freikorp (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Rural Enterprise 

message: The infobox currently lists student numbers as 2,755 total comprising of 2590 undergrads, 2695 postgrads and 80 FE. This obviously does not tally. The correct numbers, according to the citation listed, are 2755 total comprising 2590 undergrads, 110 postgrads and 60 FE students. These numbers still do not sum perfectly but are in line with the source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.155.234.21 (talk) 07:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Numbers 

message: Wikipedia is above politics, so I fail to understand how this promotional piece for the pet project of a leading sponsor of a politic party, should escape scrutiny. Start with the name- at least discuss how an FE college should get the right to call itself a university. How on earth have so many positive adjectives been crammed into such a small space? I landed here while checking the claims and references for JCB Academy which had been tagged as an . I am very tempted to be bold and make a few improvements. Has anyone got any comments first. --ClemRutter (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: --ClemRutter (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional twaddle 

message: Looking for names to wikilink, I came upon mention that a Nick Herbert opened the Postgraduate and Professional Development facility at the University in 2010. Would that be the Nick Herbert who is now Lord Herbert of South Downs? At time he was an MP but in 2010 he transitioned in political portfolio from Shadow DEFRA Secretary to government Minister of State at the Home Office. I am hesitant to wikilink the name to this politician until I am sure others can confirm whether or not it is same man or a namesake.Cloptonson (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nick Herbert
Talk:The Bells of St. Mary's (song)

message: I have been unable to trace any reference confirming when this parody version of the song emerged. Did it emerge during WW2, or after the Bing Crosby film was issued? If it was not sung until after WW2 then it would have relied upon National Servicemen for its spread.Ntmr (talk) 11:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Balls of Sarn’t Major
Talk:History of European exploration in Tibet

message: How come there is no mention of Abbe Huc in the article? I guess Przewalsky didn't like him, but IMO that's no excuse to simply ignore the man. Yaan 20:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbe Huc

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Elisabeth Benson Booz (1986), Tibet. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Booth, East Riding of Yorkshire

message: Is Booth the same place as Boothferry? On maps it appears to be shown as Boothferry but road signs indicate Booth. If they are equivalent then we can redirect this article to Boothferry.
Keith D 21:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Geo coords go to same lorry park spot as Boothferry. The find sources added give nothing. I think there should be a merge. Acabashi (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moldovenești

message: One week ago when the the History section was created, a non-sourced (and biased) information, implying that the region was deserted in the 13th Century, was also included. As most people interested in Transylvanian history know, this subject is very controversial and unfortunately politically driven. I don't think that the article about this particular village is a good place for such biased original research. Alexrap 21:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no source for this information and this seems to be just another personal theory. --Roamataa 22:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Heatons

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 04:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sports Direct Ireland →  – This page was recently moved from Heatons to Sports Direct Ireland without any discussion. The entire content of the article relates to the former Heatons department store business, rather than the Sports Direct sports business that bought it out. Further, I can't find any instance of a "Sports Direct Ireland" brand - Heatons was simply closed and its shops were reopened as Sports Direct. Gatepainter (talk) 22:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 May 2024 

message: Only started to write it. Give me time. I WILL fix it--Letterkennyboi 21:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Stubs clearly states what could happen with really short stubs. Please use subpages for articles you are working on, but are still incomplete, instead of creating new, incomplete articles. Thank you. BoricuaeddieTalk • Contribs • Spread the love!  21:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Douglas Lute

message: There's nothing I can contribute to this gentleman's bio, but it is directly pasted from the JCS webpage.
This page has a picture with a caption that says Mr. Kimmit is a Defense Department official. But his own page says he is a military officer, currently serving as US Central Command’s deputy director for strategy and plans. One of these pages is wrong I think.
: As I understand it, Kimmit is retired, and his current position is on the civilian side of the Department of Defence. Titles like "Deputy Assistant Secretary" are civilian. Tangurena 20:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Despite his position it looks like his 2010 retirement wasn't covered in the press much and didn't get updated here for over a year.  The only source I could find was an article speculating about his return from retirement for a promotion, which I didn't include as it is just speculation at the moment.  Robert Bin Peters (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In need of update 