lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trimaran

message: I removed the following counter safety argument:
:[This  is  highly  questionable  statement  particularly  given  the  ORMA  60  problems  &  recent  snapping  of  Route du Rhum  vessels  in  2002.  Capsizing  is  also  inherently  more  likely  at  high  speeds  vs  monohulls.  Lifeboats and  rescue  vessels are  invariably  monohull  because  they  are  safer  in  foul  weather.]
Because it was written as a talk page entry. --Van helsing 07:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Safety argument

message: The USS Independence (LCS-2) is being built with a trimaran design.  I'm not sure how you want to go about editing this page in light of that, but it needs to be noted.
:This vessel actually does not belong to this article about saling vessels. Should be moved to engine driven trimarans. Lidingo SWE (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Independence (LCS-2) 

message: Under the topic of folding designs, the blurb about Corsair is unrelated to the subject, and appears to be an advertisement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.184.192 (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism about Corsair? 

message: The terms vaka, aka, and ama are said to be common terms.  Perhaps this is so in America, but in the UK and Europe, this terminology is unheard of.  Even assuming the Polynesian words to be as common in the USA as is claimed, I think it would be preferable to use the plain English equivalent terms (hull, outrigger, float, wings, beams, etc) as then all readers would understand the meaning immediately without further reference. Arrivisto (talk) 14:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polynesian terminology - isn't plain English clearer? 

message: Hi , in reference to my deletion of material in the subject section, it had a number of problems:
#It was largely unsupported by Wikipedia:Reliable sources. A company press release is not an example of such.
#It contained what appeared to be original research, e.g. the first two sentences.
#It contained opinions, not consistent with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, e.g. the last sentence.
I trimmed the section down to a statement that was supported by a reliable source. It would be better to build it from there with properly supported material, rather than restore problematic material wholesale. I'm happy to help you build this section in line with WP guidelines. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on fast ferries
Talk:Sebastian Mankuzhikary

message: I am keeping the original text at User:Bijee/Sebastian Mankuzhikary for while, so that somebody can ref. and improve this article. Bijee 01:38, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original text 
Talk:New Democrat Network

message: I understand what this is trying to get across, but this:
:The NDN, like the DLC, is centrist. However, it differs from the DLC in that in emphasises a grassroots, bottom-up model as opposed to the DLC, which emphasises corporate influence and top-down control. Additionaly, the NDN eschews political orthodoxy when promoting candidates.
is blatantly POV, insofar as it assumes a criticism of the DLC as fact. I can't come up with a better way to phrase it right at the moment, so for the time being I've tagged it as an NPOV dispute.
RadicalSubversiv E 06:46, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I disupute that the language implies a criticism, I have reworded it in light of this sensitivity. --Holdek 02:30, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Maputo Bay

message: Ironically, "Delagoa Bay" has 10x the Google hits of "Maputo Bay", even though the latter is now the official name. Stan 06:49, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, Delagoa had 200 years of history when it changed the name to Maputo, in 1975.--Rui Silva 12:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Could someone rotate the image of Maputo bay 270 degrees, since its north is now facing east. Thanks--Rui Silva 12:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rotate the picture

message: The phrase "Zulu hordes" sounds unencyclopedic. Also, was it the Zulu, the Swazi, or another Bantu tribe which prevented the colonists from expanding into the interior? Vdrj2 01:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording in history section

message: The Wikipedia article on Maria I of Portugal contains a comment on the "1781 cession of Delagoa Bay from Austria to Portugal".
I thought it was unusual that Austria would be involved in this part of the world, so came here for more information, but there is no mention of it here. I am new to editing (created a login to write this) and so don't want to risk plagiarising other sources by writing a section myself.
Ianbsa (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information required on 1781 cession to Portugal 

message: So...the Austrian East India Company established the forts in 1799, but the Portuguese removed them before that in 1781? I suspect that the first date in incorrect. Teixant (talk) 07:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austrian East India Company 
Wikipedia talk:WikiMoney accounts

message: How come Fonzi didn't get robbed? - Ta bu shi da yu 08:17, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: This page was the subject of an MfD debate concluded on 2 May 2006.  The result was Keep. Xoloz 14:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD Result

message: Can I join this group? It's currently inactive, but would it really hurt if I put my name down? Sergeant Snopake 10:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add yourself if you meet the criteria (specified on the page) McKay 13:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joining 

message: What's stopping me from saying I have ψ30000?--Mac Lover TalkC 03:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: People like me who monitor every change and make sure everything adds up right (200 edits, for ψ20, and everything else has to match.) McKay 13:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see.--Mac Lover TalkC 14:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, same thing that keeps all vandalism out of wikipedia ;) McKay 23:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Money
Talk:Philippe's

message: You probably need to mention that both Philippe's and Cole's claim to have invented the French dip sandwich (see French dip sandwich). gK ¿? 08:32, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Claim

message: This article is not written like an ad especially if you're not familiar with the restaurant. This article is similar to the Brown Derby in that they were/are classic Southern Cal/L.A. restaurants. Recommend removal in one week if not justified. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been two weeks, so I pulled the tag. I could not find one sentence that read like an advertisement, as opposed to a piece about a local favorite spot, although I did pull the unencyclopedic term, "yummy". The article draws upon third-party sources, albeit mostly local ones, and reflects their content. I haven't seen it recently, but Sandwiches That You Will Like (not local or mentioned) gave them comparable treatment. The last photo may be excessive.Novangelis (talk) 20:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad tag not needed
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Collaboration of the Week

message: Does anyone else think that the policy on pruning needs to be revamped?  I would propose a slightly stricter policy: changing the and in If a nomination has been has less then 4 votes, and receives no new votes for over two weeks (14 days), to OR.  As long as people keep nominating articles, we can handle the increased turnover.  I really don't see a fair way to avoid Democracy in the Middle East, given that it is clearly next according to policy, unless Africa gets a bunch more votes in the next couple days. -  — BanyanTree 00:50, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pruning? 

message: I have made a proposal for a reorganization of CSB that suggests the abandonment of the CotW at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.  Please weigh in there. - BanyanTree 01:23, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed reorganizaiton of CSB 

message: You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride! 
* What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
* When? June 2015
* How can you help? 
*: 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
*: 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
*: 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! 
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa
(timestamp may not be accurate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Another Believer (talk • contribs) 15:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2015|Wiki Loves Pride]]! 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out!
Help talk:Gallery tag

message: Detroit Publishing Co. - A Yeoman of the Guard (N.B. actually a Yeoman Warder), full restoration.jpg
Official_program_-_Woman_suffrage_procession_March_3,_1913_-_crop.jpg
Thurston, the famous magician - East Indian Rope Trick.jpg
Joseph Ferdinand Keppler - The Pirate Publisher - Puck Magazine - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg
Is it possible to change the position of the caption in a gallery? This page doesn't explain whether this is possible. Jarble (talk) 20:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, using , see above. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  appears to work also:
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarble (talk • contribs) 00:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can a caption be placed under a gallery? 

message: Detroit Publishing Co. - A Yeoman of the Guard (N.B. actually a Yeoman Warder), full restoration.jpg
Official_program_-_Woman_suffrage_procession_March_3,_1913_-_crop.jpg
Thurston, the famous magician - East Indian Rope Trick.jpg
Joseph Ferdinand Keppler - The Pirate Publisher - Puck Magazine - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg
Unlike , galleries in "packed" mode leave empty spaces between the images. Is it possible to display these images in a gallery tag without spaces between them? Jarble (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not – there's a minimum width of 60px in the code, here: . I would suggest making the gallery taller to meet this minimum width. Matma Rex talk 20:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjusting margins between images 

message: In the first example under Extended syntax, the set of images is aligned left with the caption above. However, the caption is centred within the page, not centred within the set of images.
The same for a packed gallery: the gallery can be aligned left via , but the caption remains centred within the page.
I could enclose the gallery in a one-cell table which does constrain the caption, but that hurts.
Is there any clean way to adjust the caption to be over the centre of the gallery? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 14:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centred caption?
Talk:The Fifth Estate (TV program)

message: it would be nice to have some information on the content of the show, in terms of its 'tone', editorial policy, political leanings, presentation style, etc, and why (or not) its considered worth distributing around the world.
doesnt the lower case spelling conflict with E(?)nglish language rules?
Note: The hyperlink to the journalist named Peter Reilly leads to a fictional character named Peter Reilly with no mention of the actual journalist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.236.34.112 (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: What does "the fifth estate" refer to?  I know of the traditional three estates: the nobility, the clergy and the commoners, does this have anything to do with that?
Arcticwoman 16:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of title

message: The article ought to identify which of the long list of personalities are the current hosts of the show.  121a0012 (talk) 05:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current hosts? 

message: Do we know who has broadcast rights for the series outside of Canada?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.47.100.139 (talk) 02:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast Rights Outside Canada? 

message: By IMDb the series started in 1981 and not in 1975 as stated here. What is correct? --Jobu0101 (talk) 18:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1975? 

message: I see the "Current Hosts" are listed, but this is a nearly 50 year show, would be nice to be able to view past hosts, in a colourful table format, as with actors in other tv shows, rather than just a random list of related journalists. Tallard (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past hosts
Talk:Sir John Orde, 1st Baronet

message: From my Talk Page Mozzerati asked:
:The date you gave in this article (1783-93 Govener of Dominica) doesn't match the external link you also gave  or the current one  both of which say 1784 - 1789. Any idea about the discrepancy? Are your dates from some outside source?
My reply to Mozzerati on his talk page:
I  can't remember which source, but it may have been EB1911, and I would not garantee that the source which I used was correct because it was from the internet. But a quick trawl of the internet throws up this:
:1791: Slave revolt in the south and east of the island, mainly in the parish of St.Patrick. Sir John Orde receives vote of thanks from the Assembly and planter interests for suppressing the revolt.
So the dates which are supplied in the two links may not be correct. See also:
:The arms are of American interest. They are of Orde for Sir John Orde, First Baronet, Admiral of the White, Governor of Dominica 1783-93, M.P. for Yarmouth 1807-12, born 1751, created Baronet 1790. He married first in 1781 to Margaret Emma, daughter and co-heir of Richard Stephens of St. Helena, South Carolina, who died in 1790, and secondly in 1793, the daughter of John Frere of Roydon, Norfolk. He died in 1824.
Hope this helps Philip Baird Shearer 11:08, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Well, what happened? 86.132.139.119 (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In 1797 he became so exasperated with the Earl St Vincent that he challenged him to a duel" 
Talk:The Mighty Ducks (movies)

message: I've deleted the Fan fiction section because it really holds no importance to the might ducks movies. Buffy the Vampire Slayer has a larger fan fiction following and its wikipedia article only mentions fanfiction once, let alone an entire subheading. It's very confusing when one minute you're reading about the mighty ducks sequels and the next minute youre reading about fantasy homosexual relationships between characters in a pee-wee hocky team.
--Cammoore 11:44, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Joe Manchin

message: A reminder to editors: This page is for discussion of article improvement. It is also a BLP talk page with specific restrictions due to that characteristic. It is not a page to speculate about the subject's life, or to present leading questions that make implications about the subject of the biography. Editors are expected to be the researchers - if you believe something isn't adequately covered, research first - find sources. Don't guess about motives or reasons. Answer your own question - if you can't find sources that discuss or explain what you're asking about, then asking here is pointless - you're just expecting other editors to do the research for you.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page 

message: How does Political positions of Joe Manchin come to be a Wikipedia page? At first glance, that page looks like stuff which doesn't really add anything. -- M.boli (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does [[Political positions of Joe Manchin]] get to be a page?
Talk:Torness nuclear power station

message: I have no idea where the 1971 date came from? This can not be correct since:-
* Tony Benn inaurgiated the construction as Energy Minister in 1978.
* As the article states SSEB were undertaking exhibitions, etc. as a prelude to getting permission for construction in the mid 1970's.
--Stewart 17:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The IAEA PRIS database has the definitive answer, "Construction Started: 1980/08/01" for both units:   Rwendland 17:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commencment of Construction
Talk:Oops

message: Please give some reason.--BLT-FQX 07:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System got deleted? 

message: * < http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=oops&diff=155768321&oldid=46743023 >.
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 15:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ category_talk:redirects_to_Wiktionary ]] [[ wiktionary : oops ]]
Talk:Marker interface pattern

message: Maybe a bit offtopic, but I do not see the point having the clone() method in Object and a seperate interface making a call to clone "valid". Where is the advantage over letting Clonable have (is this correct english?) a method clone() (making this a non-marker interface) or is this for historical reasons? :) A better example for a marker interface would be appreciated.
:I agree. It's exactly what I thought when I read the article. Alf Boggis (talk) 14:26, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the last sentence of the introduction paragraph, the statement "If none of these tests pass, the method throws NotSerializableException." is made. My knowledge of java isn't that strong, but should it be "If any of these tests fail, the method throws NotSerializableException."? --WikiWizard (talk) 00:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction paragraph 

message: I think a further clarification should be added why an interface is defined to be a marker interface. For instance, it is not clear to every reader 
*why the Serializable interface does not have a serialize(…) and a deserialize(…) method, say, so that all the "marked" classes have the same methods for the same task, and
*why JavaBeans are not using a marker interface to mark them as beans as such in a conspicious way.
SAE1962 (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further clarification needed 

message: The critique section imho shows an inappropriate example. The scenario appears to be a liskov violation. If this is resolved, the use of the tagging interface is perfectly sane in the example. This should be at least mentioned. On the other hand - and that would imho make a good critique point - if some state or ghost intrinsic to a class needs to be expressed with a marker and is not handled by other means, this smells a lot like there's a refactoring needed. If you deal with classes members "in a specific way" depending on an empty interface, this makes the use of the API which defines the members in the first place unsafe - and that should of course be avoided.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.64.180 (talk) 09:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critique
File talk:LocationEuropeanUnion25.png

message: French and Iberian overseas territories do not seem to be included. David de Cooman 13:37, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Guadeloupe, Martinique, Reunion, the Azores, Madeira and the Canaries are too small to show up; other overseas territories (besides Guiana) are not part of the EU. Radagast 15:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I see them. → SeeSchloß 16:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Iceland is not part of the EU, but it is in Europe, and so it should be showing in this map (in grey).
:No it shouldn't. The only reason the others that aren't in the EU are shown is because they're bordering/very close to members, and it would look weird to crop right to the borders. - RedHot 10:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iceland 

message: Anyone else think it would be a good idea to remove the internal borders of the EU on the map? - RedHot 10:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borders
Talk:Cognitive tutor

message: I don't believe that this article fits into the WikiProject Computing project.  Please review. --Cpkondas (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No I definitely think that a cognitive tutor falls under the computing project. As opposed to a human tutor, the cognitive tutor that is referred to here is a computer system that uses a computational model of human cognition to give students personalized feedback Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 8, 30-43.
I like the Cmaclell edits. Wondering if the results of the new RAND study should be summarized and added as well. The point against doing so is that the paper is not yet peer reviewed. The point in favor is that Carnegie Learning is already issuing a press release (or so someone from RAND told me). Also, the results are from the largest study of this software to date. Here's a link to the working paper. Thoughts?
Davidalso (talk) 06:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Yes, this would definitely be a good addition and a full report is now available here.
The following statement is out of date (as indicated by one reference being from 1995!): "At this time, creating a Cognitive Tutor® for all subject areas is not practical or economical. Cognitive Tutor® has been used successfully but is still limited to tutoring algebra, computer programming and geometry because these subject areas have an optimal balance of production rules, complexity and maximum benefit to the learner.[1][19]"  Many Cognitive Tutors have been developed using the Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools for a wide variety of subject areas, including Genetics, Chemistry, middle school math, Statistics, Computer Science, French culture, Chinese symbols, English grammar, etc.. Koedinger (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports

message: Were only three Lords Warden commoners?  Bear in mind that even HRH Prince William of Wales is technically a commoner  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiachra10003 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Commoners 

message: Why is a link given to an empty page John Beaumont (soldier) when John Beaumont (MP) is the same person? 83.85.10.162 (talk) 11:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Beaumont 