Talk:Interstate Commerce Commission

message: This article needs more details, more history, etc.  A transportation economist would be helpful.
"Is this the united states or what?" - yes.
I also agree that the article needs more detail. What really irks me, is that there is no page for the act that created it. I dont really care too much about the commission itself, but the act and the events that precluded its creation, IE the big "Trusts" of the guilded age and public pressure to regulate them, and how that affected congress members. uberblue 03:26, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this the united states or what?

message: Hello --
The link for one of the cases cited in the Interstate Commerce Commission article, Mitchell v. US, takes the reader to the wrong case.  The correct citation is 313 US 80 (1941).
Cheers,
138.238.107.141 (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation error in Interstate Commerce Commission wikipedia entry 

message: There is a nice image at http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/3239317542/
If anyone can determine if it was published before 1923 (which is my hunch), then we could use it here. Kingturtle (talk) 12:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  image 

message: Information is available in national archive of its establishment under the chair Senator Cullom
http://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-07-interstate-commerce.html Mulp (talk) 08:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sponsor was Shelby Cullom of Illinois 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't corperate lawyer Richard Olney point out that, not the Attorney General of the time period? If someone could factcheck this.... 74.68.98.203 (talk) 03:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of Quote 

message: I've removed the following paragraphs from the "Creation" section:
Equally significant, the Elkins Act required that rates be published.  Eventually, when this piece of (economic) anti-discrimination legislation was constitutionally challenged, the United States Supreme Court ruled it to be constitutional.Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 And significantly (for the future of anti-discrimination legal challenges), the Court founded its ruling upon the existence of the then-new 14th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, and its equal protection clause.
In the Supreme Court's view, the U. S. Congress through legislation could outlaw an act of (economic) discrimination against an individual or corporation if the act of discrimination constituted for the affected person(s) a failure by the discriminator to afford the affected person(s) the equal application (protection) of the rules or laws.
Two main problems here:  first, the citation leads the reader to the Munn v. Illinois case, which the Supreme Court decided in 1876 - eleven years before the ICC was created.  The paragraph makes it sound like this case happened after the ICC came into being.
Second, the citation makes no sense because the sentence is discussing the Elkins Act, which was passed by Congress in 1903.  The Fourteenth Amendment, also referred to, was adopted in 1868.  So this information is all jumbled up and incorrect as written.  I'm posting it here for future reference in case another editor wants to try straightening things out.  Textorus (talk) 07:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading paragraphs removed

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: . Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mackensen (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Interstate Commerce Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061016100632/http://www.beardbooks.com/railway_problems.html to http://www.beardbooks.com/railway_problems.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate Commerce Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125055556/http://womensmemorial.org/Education/BHMSys.html to http://www.womensmemorial.org/Education/BHMSys.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello--I added a paragraph under the heading "Criticism" to describe the story of the ICC's 3-month commitment of E Moody Boynton,  inventor of a  potential new entrant RR system, to a lunatic asylum. Not sure this is in the right spot in the article or it deserves better transition or the heading should be expanded a bit. Thanks Riverbend Trail (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New para re:ICC's commitment of E Moody Boynton to a lunatic asylum--in correct place?