lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Help talk:Multilingual support

message: so, i found this font called "KNE Sans Serif 24" and has different types of support for each language, but a note for arabic: it does not combine the characters like it does in other fonts. link here
--Alefar (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  new font (KNE Sans Serif 24) 

message: How good is the Noto Sans font for the Bhaiksuki script? --Apisite (talk) 09:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhaiksuki 

message: I want to know where to download support fonts for unicode 14.0.
--Kankachi1980Kan (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode 14.0 fonts 

message: The browser support section speaks of Internet Explorer and not of Microsoft Edge, which suggests to me that it hasn't recently been tested in modern browsers. —Octavo (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating browser support (2022) 

message: Google already released Noto Sans Samaritan, I wonder if someone would add that to the page since it would be helpful --Ternatean Libra (talk) 08:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Samaritan font 

message: Kaktovik numerals were added to Unicode recently (v15.0). While not a script, shouldn't Kaktovik numerals be added to the list, for font support? DePiep (talk) 12:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. DRMcCreedy (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaktovik numerals 

message: Has this page been crosschecked for all Unicode scripts being present and findable? Listed here and  are the 166. DePiep (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scripts check 

message: I do have Noto fonts installed for several scripts (Psalter Pahlavi, Linear A and B), but the characters nevertheless aren't rendered correctly when I view Wikipedia articles with any browser. I get empty squares instead. The characters do appear correctly in Word, for example (although Segoe UI Historic doesn't really display the Psalter Pahlavi characters in Word either, contrary to what the page suggests). Any ideas as to what the problem could be? 62.73.69.121 (talk) 07:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fonts aren't displayed correctly 

message: I have found a font that supports the following scripts listed on this page: Armenian, Deseret, Gothic, Kaktovik Numerals, Lisu, Shavian. The font's name is Lentariso, and it can be found on Github. I was wondering if it would be possible to add the font to the lists? GeniusWorkbench4622 20:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A decorative font with many unusual letterforms doesn't sound like a useful addition to this page in general in my opinion. With the possible exception of Kaktovik numerals, there are many better fonts to recommend to someone who were to see tofu otherwise. – MwGamera (talk) 13:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a question.
Talk:Poffertjes

message: This recipe calls for self-raising flour, milk and eggs.  Then it refers to the yeast.  What yeast?  And if yeast is needed, why self-raising?  I don't have any experience with poffertjes, but it's clear that something is seriously wrong here.  Groogle (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yeast

message: The article states that poffertjes-houses appear from september to march.
This should clearly be 'from march to september'. The stands are generally very open, made from wooden planks like a 3d-puzzle and with a terras to sit in the sun. These are def not out during the winter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.164.183.162 (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: September to march

message: I'm Dutch and have never heard of poffertjes with custard. I don't think this is right at all. 2001:1C00:D03:1100:E201:B616:40EB:7CDC (talk) 12:19, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  custard
Talk:Code on demand

message: This is a bit outdated--I think most people are more familiar with Flash applications than with Java applets, and there is research cited by Adobe (the creator of Flash, who obviously has a monetary interest in making the penetration look higher than it is, so someone should track down the source) at [].  Applets are "well known" mostly by geeks and other people who have been around the net a long time.  I would guess that a lot more people are familiar with flash animations and games than with applets. Michaeljsouth 17:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've updated this, I found a more recent paper for which I've added a citation, it refers to Flash and JavaScript also. --Npgall (talk) 23:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Starslip Crisis

message: I'd like to point everyone to http://www.halfpixel.com/2007/02/15/delete-wikipedia/
Read please especially if you're an admin--Energman 17:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That article could not be more damning of the bias of the editors against webcomics, and how easy it is to manipulate that bias. Wikipedia was originally created under the misguided and naive Utopian ideal of a perfect socialist encyclopedia where everyone could contribute and edit. The problem is, there is no such thing as socialism, nor Utopia, because people have personal bias and agendas. Thus, Wikipedia has become a platform for He Whosoever Sitteth At The Computer Longest to affect whatever changes and edits they desire, while everyone else with jobs, families, and other real-life issues that keep them from being completely absorbed in editing all day long find themselves shut out. It has become the playground of internet-mob-rule, personal bias, and the power is in favour of those who can micromanage-edit articles all day long instead of the general population. The events of this deletion, and how easily Wikipedia was played, and has been played in many other articles I have seen, shows critical flaws in the system and the ideology behind it.--Breandán 19:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mix in the concept of Wikiality, we have absolute proof that Wikipedia is far too trusted for all its flaws.  This is not to say that it is a complete failure.  It's a better jumping-off-point than many old encyclopedias.--The Sporadic Update 23:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:My Bed

message: A thought: maybe fix up the last paragraph? It really talks down to the reader. It sounds as if one is a simpleton if they do not understand this piece. Conceptual art itself is always a place of controversy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.8.237.164 (talk • contribs).
:Have a go. Tyrenius 18:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A thought

message: Is this furniture or is this a work of art? Can it actually be used as furniture? Is it just furniture and nothing else? Maybe it's furniture in the same way as this is a pipe? and this is a urinal? and these are just bricks? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its junk myself; same for the urinal, but not the bricks. But that is my opinion and of no matter. Equally, wondering if is "just furniture and nothing else" is facile in this context and not the place for categorisers. Obviously it is a piece of furniture. Endy story. Ceoil (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Individual pieces of furniture]]
Talk:Hispanicisms in English

message: I strongly dislike the idea of merging Spanglish into this... and are somewhat surprised that the Spanglish article hasn't been incorporated into categories encompassing Cuban and Puerto Rican culture, as it was in the Mexican-American cultural Project. Spanglish to me is not the same thing... I might be wrong, but I sense Spanglish is more like Anglicisms in Spanish, and not the other way around... where is the discussion page on the merger proposal? Demf 17:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/L0b0t

message: *Comment from user:L0b0t: WP:TALK pertains to article talk pages, user talk pages are covered by WP:USER which states in part:"On a user's own talk page, policy does not prohibit the removal of comments at that user's discretion, although archival is preferred to removal. Please note, though, that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon."
I moved this here because its inappropriate to edit into someonelses grounds for an RFC. Use the space below where it says Response. Oh, I see you you already did. Then I think you have said what you wanted. --Spartaz 17:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from LobOt

message: L0b0t apparently believes it's not proper for me to certify, since I only tried to resolve this dispute recently.  I don't see that this objection holds water, but more importantly, I'm disappointed that we're seeing discussion of  "the rules" rather than the issue at hand.  Anyway, I did (very recently) try and fail to resolve this dispute, because I saw that some of the diffs provided showed ample evidence that he's using the term "vandalism" far too loosely.  Friday (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've certified the dispute. Perhapses we can now move on to the real issue here? ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 15:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Procedural objection?
Talk:Town Hall, Kaunas

message: Article at least should be moved to Town Hall and the Square, Kaunas, possibly even divided, if info will be sufficient, Town Hall, Kaunas  and  Town Hall Square, Kaunas. Suggestions are welcome, M.K. 17:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: there still is no any info about the square, so it is in place until major additions would happen.Iulius 21:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Perkinsus marinus

message: This is not a virus, right?  Maybe the external link should be displayed as "Description of pathogen" or "Description of disease"
: P. Marinus is apparently not a virus but is a protozoan organism (considerably more colloquially: it is a single cell, it is not a strand of RNA).  I have modified the External links considerably.  67.86.73.252 (talk) 23:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I think this article might look nice if it had a taxobox template.  The irony is that the classification of P. Marinus is apparently still the subject of debate, hence trying to classify this organism via a wiki template is all the more challenging.  In order to leave some proposal behind I'll leave this crude attempt here to allow others to help fill in the blanks better than I have done, before transferring it over to the article: 67.86.73.252 (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxobox 

message: If a user searches "Dermo" can we make it redirect here? Gibby is gibby (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds find to me. See WP:REDIRECT for how to do this, and ask if you have any questions. Kingdon (talk) 15:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks to Gibby for the helpful redirect. Would anyone want to start the Haplosporidium nelsoni article (or re-introduce illustrations to this article)?  By the way, MSX is already a page on another topic and MSX (disambiguation) also exists, hence an analogous redirect of MSX to Haplosporidium nelsoni should not be done tried in my opinion (but once the article is started the link on the dab page could be updated). 67.86.73.252 (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback! I could start a page about MSX, I have alot of information on the subject but i might have to ask you a few questions about formatting. It'll probably take me a few days to get started on the page though. Gibby is gibby (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: This page has a considerable about of information relating to the genus rather than exclusive to the species P marianus. This probably needs a new page for itself.DrMicro (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus
Talk:Walter Ciszek

message: Didn't Brother Walter give his testimony on a record called "Imprisoned for Jesus in the Soviet Union" with Tony and Marge Abram?  Or is that a different Brother Walter?184.147.235.240 (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Record Album
Talk:Henry Abbot (martyr)

message: The image at a first glance does not look bad for something generated by an AI, even if it does not make any logical sense (and the hands are wrong). But what does it say about the Blessed Henry Abbot? Nothing. It has no historicity, no clear artistic intent, it says nothing about the actual man. As such, I propose removal. 2001:B07:6462:DE81:201:2EFF:FE56:4742 (talk) 19:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image generated by Midjourney?
Talk:Urodela

message: In the article there are a few mistakes on the origin of the words Urodela and Caudata:
Uros and not Ur means tail Greek.
Cauda (not Caude) is tail in Latin not in Greek. Plch 23:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tail 

message: Thanks for pointing the mistake..You should've corrected it!
Rohit Raj 03:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: You used a very old synonym for the Giant Chinese and Japanese salamanders. They are now in the genus Andrias of the family cryptobranchidae. 
Also, the North American mole salamanders are of the genus Ambystoma not Ambylostoma.
Salamanders do occur in South America as part of the large genus of Plethodontid salamanders, Bolitoglossa.
All your examples are genus names. Some of these are large and contain many species such as Ambystoma and Tylototriton. 
I also seriously doubt your information on neoteny in salamanders and suggest you cite some sources for this information. The causes of facultative neoteny are not currently known.
Abrahmsimons 19:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, all of Abrahmsimons's points are valid. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 15:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur that this is also a valid correction. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 15:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: Why doesn't this redirect to Salamander, as Caudata does?  -- Visviva 09:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question!  Very, very good candidate for a merge (if anything in here is worth merging). — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 15:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: I will soon be merging this article into salamander, trimming and combining parts that are relevant and sourced. StevePrutz (talk) 21:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed. StevePrutz (talk) 03:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge notice
Talk:Nicholas Garlick

message: I intend to try a complete rewrite of this article, as I feel it's completely based on the old Catholic Encylopaedia, with just a word changed here and there. (Of course, since it's public domain, there's nothing wrong with that.) I have already written articles about Nicholas Garlick's two fellow martyrs, Robert Ludlam and Richard Simpson. I used a number of different printed sources, and would find it much easier to do the same thing with this article (i.e. start from scratch) than to try to incorporate some new material into the Catholic Encyclopaedia version. I have looked at the history of the page, and it doesn't seem as if anyone put a lot of their own work and creativity into it. I earlier corrected an incorrect name, removed some less-than-relevant information, and updated the article to reflect that he's now "Blessed", not "Venerable". But, because it's just the Catholic Encyclopaedia article, reworded, corrected, and updated, I hope I can rewrite the whole thing mercilessly, without trampling on the toes of a fellow editor. ElinorD (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Talk:William Ireland (Jesuit)

message: I have to admit that this article is Catholic WP:POV, when it should be WP:NPOV.
For example it says he is a martyr, this is obviously POV. To other people he was a criminal.
also that quote at the end "We are innocent, we lose our lives wrongfully, we pray God to forgive them that are the causes of it.", has quite clearly been used to support Catholic POV. This article needs to be toned down. Ijanderson977 (talk) 14:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Lorraine Miller

message: I have twice reverted, and will continue to revert, the contention in the article that Ms. Miller was removed as Clerk of the House because she is African-American. The change of Clerk was the inevitable result of the change in control of the House from Democratic to Republican with the start of the 112th Congress. Although the Clerk performs largely nonpartisan functions, it is well-accepted that this officership is within the sole control of the majority party, and specifically of the Speaker. Ms. Miller is a Democrat and before becoming Clerk, as the article notes, was a long-serving aide to Nancy Pelosi. Ms. Miller's predecessor and successor, Karen Haas, is a Republican and formerly worked as an assistant to Republican leadership within the House. 
There is no need, and no evidence, to suggest that a racial motive was involved. Making this allegation without evidence is a violation of our policy on articles concerning living persons and is unacceptable. Please note that reversion of BLP violations is exempt from the three-revert rule. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of incorrect statement 

message: There is no mention of the fact that she was not re-nominated for clerk by the Democratic caucus at the beginning of the 112th congress. Does anyone know why?  I could not find any information about it. 24.128.247.159 (talk) 21:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Often the outgoing House officers are not renominated on the minority party's slate for the new Congress, because there's no particular advantage to them in being nominated and losing in a foreordained vote. Typically, the minority party's candidates for House officers are the individuals who will be serving as senior aides to the minority party leadership in the new Congress (and who are mentioned in a resolution adopted later on the first day of the session naming six statutory minority employees). Our article doesn't say: do we know whether Ms. Miller is doing so? Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not nominated for clerk in 112th Congress
Talk:Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America

message: Note: this permission only speaks to the text copyright and not to the quality of the article or the notability of its subject.Bastiq▼e demandez 18:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On top of the prior tag of this article presenting itself as a advert, I added the "inappropriate person" tag due to the opening passage of the article using "our"; it's tone incorrectly assumes the person reading the article is from the USA. I would also argue the factuality of the article in general (no citations) and it's implied bias. In general this article needs a massive rewrite. Keithieopia (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All the material of my above gripes have been removed, however now the article lacks notability and is incomplete. Thus, I have added these tags to the article. Keithieopia (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I was reading another entry and clicked on a link leading me to this entry. And I must say, this entry is absolutely horrible. The section concerning the Board of Directors reads like it was taken from directly from the group's website.74.138.40.147 (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Written 

message: Last week, a caller to the Glenn Beck program said that she was invited to march with IAVA on Veteran's Day, and gushed about how well she and other marchers were treated -- a banquet, etc. However, she "did some research" afterwards, and "found out that it was funded by George Soros / MoveOn.org."
The radio host then went into a lengthy dissertation about its Communist tactics, ending with...
Here's a clip of Rachel Maddow discussing the event on her program: http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/rachel-maddow-tells-glenn-beck-leave-iava-
:And your point is what, exactly?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.40.147 (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glenn Beck's personification as a Communist Front Group
Talk:Nothing by mouth

message: should we tag this with the pharmacology category as well.  Since it is relevant in the medical field relating to pharmacological drugs. Tkjazzer 14:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  should tag with pharmocology category? 

message: This article suggested that diabetic patients who are NPO for a procedure should be given a drip containing a *gram* of insulin for every 5 grams of dextrose. This is almost certainly wrong, and if anyone actually followed it, it could easily kill someone. Insulin doses are not measured in grams, they are measured in units, so this sounds like a typo, though I'm not an expert so I would not be able to say precisely what an appropriate dose would be. Even so, a whole gram of insulin would likely be fatal unless given at a glacial pace. Considering the potential severity of the issue and the lack of any reference, I have removed this statement from the article. -NorsemanII (talk) 12:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insulin
Talk:Maximum length sequence

message: Hi, not sure one could say that the MLS "are" a polynomial ring ( I mean by that there is in the abstract a number of "they" and in my understanding the sequence is not a polynomial as is refered in the "polynomial ring" article.
So I would suggest to replace that by "they can be derived" or that some characteristic of the sequence is related to a polynomial ring or such
*******
Regarding the mention of fMRI in the introductory paragraph. The prior version referenced a paper from my laboratory that was not an ideal citation for the m-sequence page. I replaced the citation of my work with that of Buracas that is earlier and more appropriate to a discussion of m-sequences.
-- Geoffrey K Aguirre
4/23/2010
*******  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.218.221 (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: This is very unclear. Maybe someone links to referenced material could be sprinkled in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.irwin (talk • contribs) 18:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraction of impulse responses 

message: It would be very helpful if info about generating the primative polynomials could be added here. For example can a computer algebra system like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PARI/GP generate them? If so, how? Woz2 (talk) 20:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on generating the primative polynomials? 

message: First of all, I just changed the redirect for PN sequences to go to Linear-feedback shift register.  Another pseudonym or synonym for LFSR sequence (besides *"PN sequence"*) is this page (Maximum length sequence).
"LFSR sequences", "PN sequences", "Maximum length sequences" (MLS), and binary "Galois fields" (GF(2)) are all about the same thing.  While I certainly do not propose merging this with the Galios field page, the first three should be merged and presented in the Computer science or Electrical engineering context.  Not in a pure mathematics context.
I am and will remain an anonymous IP.  But will some Wikipedians with accounts join in this effort to fix this problem?  Please discuss at the other talk page.  71.184.228.118 (talk) 03:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Linear-feedback shift register]]