Talk:Nazi UFOs

message: ...and so it should be removed!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.125.132.224 (talk) 23:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is all unsourced hoax... 

message: ...and so it should not say "science fiction, conspiracy theory" nor should it be merged with "Space Nazis". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eHPJ3mu-20&feature=endscreen&NR=1 62.255.75.224 (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is Aviation History 

message: in fact the "first modern sightings" were a good bit earlier according to UFO . So we need a citation for the claim that they occured at this time. --Alvestrand 16:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "first modern sightings" unsourced 

message: Nazis at that time used ionization.  Basically if you were to electrify a ring you would def. create a lift.   The ring would be so ionized that it would lift up a craft.  This is done with nuclear fusion reactors within the craft.  Then you would need controls to move it forward.  This can be done via jet turbines.  The technology was primitive  compared to vacuum pluralization methods, or even plasma for solar travel, it was limited to the atmospheric oxidized space but its not being used today, so it was advanced.  Ionization just creates lift.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.100.60.164 (talk) 17:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology used not that complex 

message: Since UFO stands for unindentified flying object but these are identified as Nazi, are they really UFOs or more like NFO (Nazi Flying Objects)? Just a semantics thing I guess but if someone could clear this up. Thanks.VarunRajendran 18:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nazi UFO" is a term that English writings on the subject use. Gazpacho 02:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that "nazi flying saucers" would be far more appropriate, despite of the popular misuse of "UFO". I think that using "UFO" because it's popular is somewhat like grouping spiders with insects (as insects, not arthropods) since many people don't make these distinctions. --Extremophile 14:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   We know very little of this (maybe) objects, so can be clasified as Unidentified. At least in some form or aspects. --80.25.191.37 (talk) 10:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think calling them unidentified is not a big problem. Timthemerciful (talk) 02:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nazi UFO?

message: * http://es.geocities.com/donmiguelserrano/mitos/archivos_haunebu/7.jpg Is this a hoax? 10:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Are theese pictures a hoax? And can it be regarded open content?

message: The article says "The Bell supposedly crashed in Pennsylvania in the 50's." Ignoring the rogue apostrophe, for now, this appears to refer to the Kecksburg UFO incident, but that happened in 1965. Either way this needs clarifying. (Emperor (talk) 02:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bell's 1950s crash? 

message: Would anyone else support merging the above article into this one? They're not quite the same thing, admittedly - that article is about a fictional trope whereas this one's about allegedly real claims - but they cover similar enough ground that I think they could be covered in a single article. Robofish (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'll just do it if nobody objects. --John (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I object. These subjects aren't the same thing at all and need differing treatment. The separate articles are better as they are. Britmax (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. Pop some valid third party sources onto the Space Nazis article and it can survive as a standalone article. Otherwise it's in breach of WP:V. Say a week? --John (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a disambiguation article like zombie, headcrab, revenant,reaver, etc. So obviously the WP:V is in the linked through material. The disambiguation should be made nore obvious and the kookiness in the first sentence removed (although I like it).Corella (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Space Nazis article currently has a whole five examples of space nazis being used in sci-fi, and three of those are Star Trek alone. It should really, really be merged. OohBunnies! (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It should really, really be merged, but not to this article. Might I suggest Nazis in fiction? DoctorKubla (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Space Nazis]] 

message: "end up battling with a President of the United States who coincidentally resembles Sarah Palin."
It seems strange to claim this is coincidence, surely it's satire? sheridan (talk) 09:49, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satire 

message: Instead of these aircraft or spacecraft being referred to as "Nazi UFOs", should they not be referred to as NFO?  Or, Nazi flying objects?  It makes more sense so if anyone wants to make those edits throughout the article you have my full support.  -- biggayal (125.238.118.157 (talk) 04:39, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  N.F.O. 

message: The reference to the Vril Society should be qualified. There is no evidence that such a society existed.203.184.41.226 (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vril Society  

message: Like the first ever v-shaped jet by the empire of japan, the a9yt and its torpedo bomber counter-part, not many people know of information about this craft, the haunabau.  It was infact real, it used induction coils and 6 bmw engines via nuclear fusion, a primitive form of plasma or plasma drives.  The induction coils create recyclable energy with electricity and nuclear power.  However, they do not spin like you see in clique science fiction novels, they infact are stagnate and is why projectiles mounted on them become useless.  The craft itself can not fire through the magnetic field it creates via induction coils.  It could maybe go to mars and back, and if it reaches mars to fire a cannon, it could maybe need turn off its electromagnetic field that recycles the nuclear waste. It is the most primitive concept of ufos ever released. It was not released to the public because nazi germany couldn't figure out how to use them.  The vril for instance or pleaidian ships were superior ofcourse, because they are unearthly.  The haunabau was not though, a case as to why world war 2 was lost was because the allies nuked japan.  Japan had a naval flanker, which would infact destroy naval carriers whom were equipped with cannons and machine guns.  The fact is is that UFos which are petroleum based do not work because too much heat is created via fuel, a jet engine is a motor basically (see also the failure of the avrocar).  Even electromagnetic coils would not be able to contain the excess heat of a petroleum based craft.  The mescherschmidt 262 went too fast, no one could catch up with it, it was uttery useless in terms of dogfighting.  In terms of naval flanking it could have been useful, yet naval carriers were not in the waters of nazi germany, because they held supremacy in submarine technology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvdc1980 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haunabau Real?!? Its true history 

message: These stories of UFO's, secret Nazi bases in Antarctica or the Moon, Vril Society, etc. are all entirely fictitious. They should be mentioned at the outset.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: From the lede In UFOlogy, conspiracy theory, science fiction, and comic book stories, claims or stories have circulated linking UFOs to Nazi Germany. The German UFO theories describe supposedly successful attempts to develop advanced aircraft or spacecraft prior to and during World War II... - so I believe that is well covered. And additional section with any debunkings of Nazi UFO claims might not go amiss though. Artw (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entirely fictitious 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Nazi UFOs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061211214416/http://www.naziufos.com/NEWSCL/SCHRIEV.HTM to http://www.naziufos.com/NEWSCL/SCHRIEV.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100226104846/http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/hitler-s-stealth-fighter-3942/nazi-secret-weapons-1 to http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/hitler-s-stealth-fighter-3942/nazi-secret-weapons-1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Is it worth it to add an item to "In Popular Culture" to mention Cordwainer Smith's "Mark Elf" short story and its place in the story arc of his "Rediscovery of Man"?  Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Cordwainer Smith to the "In Popular Culture" section? 

message: Quite a stretch to link the ark of the covenant to flying saucers...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:380:63E0:0:0:0:DC3A (talk) 12:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a stretch, it's not even WP:COATRACKing, it clearly does not belong in the article since while there were Nazis in RotLA, there were no UFOs. Removed. Heiro 09:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raiders of the Lost Ark? 

message: Pope Pius said Holocaust happen for what reason fossil fuel or I need a flightline81642312 right now but right now 71.193.221.61 (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a flight line for the 1942 Bell 

message: Grusch mentions retrieval of unknown craft in northern Italy in 1933 and subsequent study of it by German (Nazi) and Italian scientists. US Forces recovered the craft in 1944 in Italy, supposedly with consent from the Pope. 2603:6011:5900:400:3875:BF71:3901:6A4A (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Grusch/Joe Rogan Episode #2065 21 Nov. 2023