lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:100 Famous Japanese Mountains

message: Sorry this page is so crappy... I've run out of time for today to work on it... Jeshii 07:14, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
I have no idea when I can omit suffixes of Japanese names. I replaced 'peak of' with 'mt.' because I think the former is not common, but the distinction between 山 and 岳 was lost. I commented out the mention of Ainu language, because all mountains of Hokkaido may be  derived from Ainu language except Taisetsu. Pitan 14:00, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to recategorise some of the regions for this page if no-one minds...am thinking of dividing the page into:
-Hokkaido
-Tohoku
-Kanto
-Chubu
-Kansai
-Chugoku
-Shikoku
-Kyushu
The current grouping making Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu into one generic area called "Western Japan" is far too general.
I will also try and complete the list in it's entirity including making pages for every single mountain on the page. Any support, questions or queries would be appreciated...
Paulman (talk) 04:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Reform, Restructuring and Completion

message: In the corresponding Japanese article, Mount Amakazari is in Chūbu region (not Kantō region) and Mount Takatsuma is in Tōhoku region / 上信越 (North Japan Sea region?) not in Kantō region. Who is right? bamse (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved both Mountains to the correct region. bamse (talk) 23:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct? 

message: The sentence "excluding mountains with an altitude of less than 1,500 m (4,921 ft)." in the paragraph "History" conflicts with the fact that at least Tsukuba and Kaimon are much lower.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim2007viatge (talk • contribs) 13:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimum 1.500m ?
Talk:Nabucco

message: Shouldn't Nabucodonosor redirect to the emperor, or to the disambiguation? 200.230.213.152 05:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nabucodonosor 

message: Byron Lee & the Dragonaires's song "Julianne" (circa 1971) is a reggae arrangement of "Chorus of the Hebrew Slaves."  Also, the "Chorus" is played by a brass band during a Sicilian scene in Godfather Part III (probably isn't news to anyone reading this). I'll leave it to those closely involved with the article to decide whether this merits inclusion. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 03:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: I don't think the information about this being the only thing Levine has ever allowed to be encored is correct.  Pavarotti performed an encore at some point (under Levine?) and Juan Diego Florez has recently performed them now that Gelb has ended the unofficial ban on encores.  Someone who knows about this better than I should change the info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.125.46 (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Encores

message: This article presently says the opera was performed under its its original name, and later under its revised name, without telling us what the original name was. Inquiring minds want to know.--StanZegel   (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified this.  The info is in the reference cited at the end of the paragraph. --GuillaumeTell 15:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: A compact disc recording of the opera is missing from the "recordings" table. I can't figure out how to edit the table without making a mess out of it, so I'd rather put the information here, so someone else competent can make the change.
The year is 1999; the principals are Renato Bruson, Maria Guleghina, Ferruccio Furlanetto, Fabio Armiliato, and Elena Zaremba; the conductor is Daniel Oren, with the Tokyo Symphony Orchestra and Tokyo Opera Singers; the label is Valois Auvidis, and the catalogue number is V4852.
Not sure what might count as an adequate reference. I did review the recording for "Opera News" -- that's the reason I know about it -- but archived reviews are only available to subscribers, and I'm not sure a webpage is sufficient authority for these purposes.
Anyway, thought I'd put the information out there, if someone wants to use it.71.183.2.134 (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A missing recording
Template talk:Ancient Egypt dynasties sidebar

message: I have added a Graeco-Roman Period; for justification see Template talk:Late Egyptian Dynasty list —Nefertum17 08:32, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Egyptian Dynasty list

message: Replace | name = ancient Egyptian dynasties with | name = Ancient Egypt dynasties sidebar so the navbar links to the current template name. I'm unable to perform these actions due to restrictions. – BrandonXLF (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - FlightTime (open channel) 04:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request November 21, 2019
Talk:Cult classic

message: You might take a look at the German parallel page Kult (Status) for an article on the beautiful cultural phenomenon. --Olaf Simons 21:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah the German article seems great - consists mostly of an in-depth historical analysis of the cult classic phenomenon, and only then lists some examples. I like the format of that version, but unfortunately my German is not up to scratch to translate it easily, nor do I possess the required knowledge of the subject matter otherwise. I see someone removed the POV tag, so I've added a  and a  tag, which might be more appropriate. Please don't remove these until the issue is addressed. -- postglock 15:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Parallel Article 

message: i'm adding links to the main articles for all these topics.
CrazySunshine 15:57, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  links to main articles. 

message: --Jahsonic 09:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am removing the lists to films, tv-series, etc...

message: I proposed this deletion with the hope that in the aftermath the German article will be translated to create a worthy article for the subject. --Yono 04:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion

message: I just moved the entire examples section to List of cult classics. I believe this vastly improves the article. I hope you agree! Foobaz·o< 02:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the list is now up for deletion. Foobaz·o< 23:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: Hi, I've changed the redirect from "Cult film" to "Cult following".  Since many cult classics are NOT films but all cult classics have a cult following, I think this is a more accurate redirection.  I'd note, as a specific example, that cult novels that were never made into films, like The Dice Man is described as a cult classic which, previously, linked to cult film.124.157.108.187 (talk) 02:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed redirect
Template talk:Modern aerobatic teams

message: I've been thinking of changing up the template a bit - I'd like to somehow incorporate the nationality of each team into the picture more obviously. I also feel that as the template grows it's getting difficult to read (too much text). I'm thereby trying to think of a way of incorporating flags into the template, but I don't see a good way of doing it that doesn't take up too much room.
*Putting one country on each line will take up too much space
*Putting the flag both before and after each set of teams will take up some space, and will look confusing with flags back-to-back, also too many flags detract from the point of the template.
*Opening flags only (i.e. at the beginning of each nation) might be confusing, but this is what I'm leaning towards right now.
Thoughts? Comments? I'm also open to other ways of doing this (i.e. without flags). -Lommer | talk 05:46, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One small flag before the relevant entry (and after the "|"). Isn't this done in some other templates? -- ALoan (Talk) 11:34, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you point them out? I looked around but didn't see any. It would be great if there were, because I mostly don't want this to be intrusive or overtake the template and it would be great to see how others did it. -Lommer | talk 02:11, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: The revisions are great! I've been meaning to alphabetize but have been merely too lazy :-) -Lommer | talk 03:41, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial observations

message: Fix Silver Stars link Bikar Orxan (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Silver Stars

message: Asas de Portugal is disbanded Bikar Orxan (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Asas de Portugal

message: The UK Airshow Directory provides detailed lists of all UK-based acts, along with European-based (along with some global) airshow acts which perform in the UK.  Created January 2015, it is regularly updated, and is organised by type of operator (civilian, military, aerobatics, pyrotechnics, historic aircraft, support organisations, etc).  Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful reference
Talk:Eynhallow

message: I would like to stress that I did not lift the original entry from any encyclopaedia. Rather, it was one of a variety of Orkney islands for which I created articles using information from a variety of different sources. Warofdreams 10:54, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial sources

message: What is the story behind the apparent issue of postage stamps for this uninhabited island? Who is making them, and why?  Example 1, example 2. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 13:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is my understanding that the concept (I won't comment on the specific examples) is one of commercial exploitation and I have removed references to them from numerous island articles. There are one or two that seem to have had a genuine use, but it is particularly absurd when the websites refer to their usage in relation to uninhabited islands. Ben MacDui 15:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stamps
Talk:Division of labour

message: A citation for this connection might be of interest but it may not actually be needed.   After all, the division of Labor requires that participants in an economic system trade to obtain the products they cannot efficiently produce by themselves or for themselves.  Surely that is what economic interdependence means. Temple Bayliss (talk) 11:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection between economic interdependence and the division of labour
Talk:Komsomolskaya Pravda

message: I bet $2 that Komsomolskaya Pravda has never had a "best breast" competition as stated on the page. See Censorship.
:Rather long-lived vandalism, I think - just reverted. -- ALoan (Talk) 15:14, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a direct translation of "всероссийская", which basically means that the newspaper is available throughout the nation (as opposed to being a local publication).—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 12:34, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
Looks like they have launched Northern European edition. It is on sale in Estonia for price of 10 kroons, named "Komsomolskaya Pravda in Northern Europe" and it shows that it is the first issue. When I look for contact data, I see that it is published in Estonia. It seems to be available also in Latvia, Lithuania, Finland and Sweden as they have given prices for those countries either. And yes, they have Soviet symbols also on their logo here too... --Tarmo Tanilsoo 09:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added material from ru:Комсомольская правда#История to the lead paragraph and new History section here, mostly using Google translator and referencing other Wikipedia pages in both references to ensure some accuracy.  It could use attention from subject-matter and language experts, and of course there are more sections of the Russian-language article to work on. --KGF0 ( T | C ) 01:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation under way 

message: In North America, we consider tabloid as literally, bullshit sold for people's viewing pleasure. Has the Komsomolskaya Pravda degraded to such a level as well? More information on the "tabloid" nature of the paper would be immensely helpful. 207.216.33.144 (talk) 06:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here, tabloid refers at least in part to the paper format. It is currently printed in tabloid format, while in the Soviet period it was printed as a broadsheet. The respective articles on Wikipedia are something of a mess, but the main point is that the term tabloid doesn't necessarily mean that that it is yellow journalism; that said, I personally have found that KP is on the supermarket-tabloid-style end of the Russian newspaper market, and so that characterization has some truth as well. Avram (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please expand upon the "tabloid" nature of the paper
Talk:Performance

message: Would it be possible to add a defintion on Performance Measurement?
I've removed this page from the disambiguation category during a bit of tidying up, because it's not really a disambig page. But maybe one is needed? - Dan 18:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig

message: If any of you have access to MIT press or informaworld you can easily source material to improve this article. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/action/showPreferences and http://www.informaworld.com Performatics (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic literature 

message: What does this mean? How is "performing blackness" different from just being black? Does it involve stereotypes, etc.? 86.130.41.222 (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social sciences, e.g. "performing blackness" 

message: The part about stage fright (starting "Theatrical performances, especially when the audience is limited to only a few observers, can ..."), especially the last sentence, is very unclear:
- Does that last sentence ("Interestingly, ...") mean to say that instrumental performers are more anxious in front of larger audiences – and that this is the opposite of what was said earlier about theatrical performers? (Actually, I think it’s called "parallel" correlation, not "positive", but I’m not sure about that.) Anyway, if this is the intended meaning, I think it should be rephrased. But there’s more:
- I checked the reference given there to find clarification, but the linked page shows only the abstract, which doesn’t mention the finding stated in the article. In other words, the reference doesn’t help corroborate the statement.
- The reference study’s abstract does talk about different-size audiences, but it calls them private vs. public performances, not about small vs. large audiences. This gives me further doubt whether the sentence has any point.
--Geke (talk) 10:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage fright section 

message: Hello! This article is in the "needs improvement" list, and I will be providing edits for a technical writing class I am enrolled in. I will be working on it for the next few weeks, but  please feel free to offer comments or suggestions!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marisajm (talk • contribs) 19:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Mobile virtual network operator

message: This article uses examples pertaining to GSM technology only.  Yet, 3 of the MVNOs given in examples do not even use GSM.  Boost uses iDen technology, amp'd and Virgin Mobile use CDMA2000.  Can we correct this to add more neutral information? Spinfire 06:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: The article really should talk about the success and failures in the MVNO market. Mathiastck 17:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Success?

message: In the US, Consumer Cellular has been around since 1995 and resells ATT/Cingular to this day:  http:///consumercellular.com--LanceHaverkamp 11:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Virgin not the first successful MVNO

message: "an MVNO" and "an M2M" should be "a MVNO" and "a M2M" -- 89.110.149.90 07:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: An

message: 'An MVNO' is correct. 'A MVNO' is not gramatically correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.189.236.16 (talk) 09:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: An MVNO 

message: "Examples of a non-consumer MVNO being Wireless Maingate and white, M2M data based MVNOs."   Sounds racist.  Justbeingmyself (talk) 21:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MVNOs in the World 

message: Many of the MVNO's/MVNE's are already bankrupt (e.g. 6G MOBILE). It would improve the article's clarity if these links were removed.
(Frederikschutte (talk) 11:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Bankrupt companies 

message: I've removed a significant amount of text from this page that seems to be entirely copypasted from http://www.prepaidmvno.com/definitions/ and http://www.prepaidmvno.com/definitions-2/mvno-classifications-types/. As far as I can tell that text was just randomly added several years back and has been more or less untouched since then. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: The "External links" section feels like advertising. Paul Koning (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 

message: I've noticed, cricket and NOW Ryan Renolds new investment company mint mobile (actually uses t-mobile towers). So if the price is amazing, and service is reliable why do the big 3 do this? There undercutting themselves. Is this like a sabotage move where they offer these services to these companies but make them poor quality so customers don't continue using them and go back to the big 3? or is this the big 3 assuming that if they don't have smaller companies that offer their services then those people won't use cell service at all. 
For the life of me, I have no idea why these companies do this? there much cheaper than their direct service.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.81.154.97 (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone include why the big 3 in the United States do this?
Talk:The Fridge (nightclub)

message: So The Fridge is now Electric Brixton - same venue, different management, has been since 2011. I have found out how to do a Template:R_from_former_name redirect, but the question I'm wondering is: should I copy all the information about The Fridge over to a new Electric Brixton page and then add a new section about Electric Brixton's history itself? Bengomori (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with changing the name. This article is primarily about the The Fridge, with respect to its management, performers, and scene, rather than the building, which was the last of its three locations. "Electric Brixton", open all of four years and of little apparent note under that name, already redirects here. So why bother changing? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 12:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree with Hobbes, in that the article is more about the venue when it was The Fridge, rather than the venue as it is now - Electric Brixton.  I think commonname applies in this instance. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Electric Brixton
Talk:Dragon Warrior (video game)

message: * Although this article is about Dragon Quest, it actually is about the US release of Dragon Warrior. The translations are inaccurate for that reason. dragonlord
** Yeah. I moved the page from Dragon Warrior I to maintain some level of consistency throughout the series, but never got around to editing the page to correctly reflect the change. Ideally, we should pick one set of names and stick with it throughout, and probably add a new section outlining the changes. Seancdaug 19:18, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
*** The title of this article reflects its entry on categories. Right now the names are as follows: Dragon Quest (video game), Dragon Quest II, Dragon Quest III, Dragon Quest IV. See it here. Dragon Quest I would look nicer on all the categories. Dragon Warrior is just a North American name, and only then for the first 4 titles. Redirects for Dragon Warrior variations could be added for easy searching. Maybe add a blip on top of each Dragon Warrior game that says "This game was released as Dragon Warrior X in North America." --Greyhawk0
**** I think it's a mistake to refer to a game by a title it wasn't released under, and this game has never been released under the title Dragon Warrior I (or Dragon Quest I, for that matter). A paranthetical note is pretty much the standard way to distinguish individual game entries from series overview entries (see also Final Fantasy (video game), Castlevania (video game), and Mega Man (NES)). I think it's reasonable to keep all the games under the "Dragon Quest" name, since the "Dragon Warrior" name has apparently been retired even in North America, but I do feel we should maintain one and only one entry for each game, even if it means that the category listing doesn't look as pretty as we'd like. – Seancdaug 04:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I think using a screenshot of a remake is a mistake. I strongly suggest you use a screenshot from the famicom/Nes original version for historical reasons. Bragador 20:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about one screenshot from each of the versions to show the differences between them? And perhaps one of the battle screen, as well. Kouban 00:24, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, I like that. Bragador 21:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot
Talk:Ferdinand de Rothschild

message: Why Baron? Presumably this was not a British title.  Nor, using the given name Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild, was he the Baron. It looks like some kind of Frenchified Austrian title.  --Henrygb 12:32, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: you are right -- Frenchified Austrian says it all!  Family was granted nobility by Emporer of Austria-Hungary, hence the Baron, and then the French branch adopted the "de" nobility mark, and many used both at the same time. I think there is a term in linguistics for this... a bit like river avon meaning "river river". Baron F certainly always referred to himself with both elements together. --mervyn 21:35, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Croydon (disambiguation)

message: At present Croydon redirects to London Borough of Croydon and that article has a note at the top redirecting to here, Croydon (disambiguation).
I think it should stay that way for some time because:
* there are over an hundred articles pointing to Croydon all of which (except User:Nickj's), I believe, refer to the London Borough of Croydon 
* at c. 300K population, the London Croydon is probably bigger than all the other Croydon's put together. (I mean by population - I know some Australian suburbs can be very generous with their plot sizes.)
RHaworth 14:20, 2005 Jan 24 (UTC)
I agree that the London Croydon should stay - it has the current inbound links, so a new disambiguation page definitely seems the way to go. -- Nickj (t) 23:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Where to redirect
Talk:Blue Eagles

message: The Indian Air Force Sarang team is another helicopter formation display team. Does it not qualify as a 'professional helicopter aerobatics team' ? Check out this (one of the many sites on the net) :
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/Airshows2004/Singapore.html
Prashanth 14:40, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)