Talk:Bartimaeus Sequence

message: Cleaned up the formatting of the article a bit. Also added more information on individual books in the series siddharth 10:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reference to harry potter and their muggles needs to be taken out.  It shouldn't be included.  Period.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.176.110.227 (talk) 20:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: this needs to be taken out

message: If someone hasn't read the books, this page could be a big spoiler to them. Should a "Spoiler Alert" be put at the top of the page, or is it not necessary, or not advised, or something? Thhhh (talk) 22:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to recall Wikipedia Policy not liking spoiler tags, based on the logic that if you come to a page about a book/show/film/whatever, you should expect spoilers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.14.93 (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: This entire section about the characters is completely biased.  Whoever wrote this just wrote the whole thing in their POV.
I agree. Especially about Bartimaeus being a comic relief. Being sarcastic and witty doesn't make you a comic relief.
I also agree, luckily I have changed the bit about comic relief to explicate a much better description of his footnotes rather than comic relief if you ask me.
:He's not a comic relief at all.  Though his comments can be really funny, his parts are just as serious as Nathaniel's or Kitty's.  Starla Dear 02:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: So many of the characters listed are unimportant, only main and major antagonists and protagonists are to be shown not character who existed for 3 chapters!!! I'm deleting the unneeded ones, if you would like to argue, visit my talk page. Therequiembellishere 05:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: OMFG!!!

message: Who's bright idea was it to list Varoq as a main character, along with Bartimaeus, Nathaniel and Kitty?  This is plainly nonsense, so I'm getting rid of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.0.15 (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varoq is NOT a major Character 

message: :Image:Amuletsamarkand.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amuletsamarkand.jpg

message: :Image:Golemseye.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Golemseye.jpg

message: In what universe is this not notable? It was on the NY Times bestseller list for months and has been reviewed and discussed in virtually every major YA book review. I'm removing the tag.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yserbius (talk • contribs) 14:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Why "Bartimaeus Sequence" when the franchise has never been officially called this and all of the lead information within the article itself still uses the naming "The Bartimaeus Trilogy"? ProfessorTofty (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it now contains 4 books. Which makes it a sequence, not a trilogy. 99.251.55.60 (talk) 05:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: This section was merged and slightly condensed from the article "List of Bartimaeus characters".  While it served a slightly
different purpose there, it's now here, and so, it should serve the purposes of this article now.  There are 55 named characters,
not including organizations.  That strikes me as a few too many *Principal* characters.  Maybe some of the "Other" lists should
be moved into a footnote?  Or maybe some (a dozen or two) characters should just be deleted.  There's some sense to enumerating
at least some minor characters, in an encyclopedic article, so we should trim lightly.Sbalfour (talk) 01:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal characters section 

message: Types of mythological or fantastic beings in contemporary fiction is a page of, well, fantasy series (movie, TV, written, whatever) and the assorted mythological and/or fantastic critters they contain.  This series would qualify.  Anyone care to add it?  Tamtrible (talk) 00:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone familiar with this series care to add it to this list?