lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crystal Decisions

message: I removed the following:
:Crystal Decisions is the automation-module, to allow unattended retrieval of reports.	 
:It works with either the stand-alone, Crystal Reports application, and may also work with the server-based, Crystal Enterprise module.	 
:		 
:The report generator appears to use objects for layout, making form design & editing far more complex than those used in the late 1980s, such as Nutshell, PC Tools Deluxe, or DBASE IV.
This text makes absolute no sense:
* The name of the company was Crystal Decisions. There is none (and never was) any product with the name Crystal Decisions.
* There is no such a thing as "automation-module" 
* The comparison with Nutshell and DBase makes no sense
* As for retrieval or reports, all that I can add is that Crystal Reports is the tool to design reports, and populate it with data on-demand. The Crystal Enterprise platforms allows the publication of reports. Once published, any data from the report is stripped, and the report can then be schedule to run daily, monthly, etc. The results of these runs are saved as "instances" (and these instances do contain data). So the you can go back and check, for example, the report of sales for the last quarter. Reports published on Crystal Enterprise can also be automaticaly delivered outside the Crystal Enterprise platform to, say, email addresses, ftp, directories on disk volumes, etc.
And finally, any informaiton on Crystal Reports or Crystal Enterprise that goes beyond a brief introduction or background about the product should really go in their respective articles.
--Pinnecco 17:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: removed

message: Informsation for this article has been provided by former employees (e.g.: myself and other wikipedia users). How is that not reference? --Pinnecco (talk) 09:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Tower Grove Park

message: If anyone would like to make use of them, I've added some public-domain images of Tower Grove Park from the HABS/HAER collection (via Library of Congress). They can be found here:   Hope they are of use, Cadastral (Talk) 20:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Some new HABS/HAER photos added

message: The article states that there are 32 pavilions in the park. I’m only counting 13. 2600:1700:7AA1:2280:5043:E2C:E7B3:EE44 (talk) 15:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Pavilions  in Tower Grove Park
Talk:Kahn Souphanousinphone

message: User:Hall Monitor recently applied the  tag to this page.  As I understand it, the TV show is the primary source for most of the information on the character.  Does anyone have a reference for the Trivia note that claims Mike Judge's friend is the inspiration for Kahn?  One of the DVDs, perhaps?  I have seasons 1-4, so if someone can point me in the right direction, I can double-check it tonight. — EagleOne\Talk 17:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems it's a real story, although not Laotian. This book, and this one predate the show yet both have the story in it. However there are some slight differences in that he's on a vine that mice are chewing. In Kahn's version no mice are mentioned so far as I can recall. If this story is mentioned in the article citing it as a Zen story/parable I think would be okay. (Laotians are not Zen, I don't think, but they're also not Lamaists either. The Souphanousinphones are kind-of pan-Buddhists, of a sort, so the writers can be free to throw in various forms of Buddhism at them. Well except maybe actual Laotian Buddhism which I think is mostly not refered to)--T. Anthony (talk) 09:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Bill DeMott

message: His release from the WWE in 2013 has yet to be confirmed by the WWE, so I have removed this information for now.
Quote:
According to a source, Billy Gunn is the new head trainer in WWE developmental. Gunn will be replacing Bill DeMott, who was reportedly released, although that is not confirmed.
DeMott had been working as the head trainer in WWE developmental since last June, when he replaced Tom Prichard.
46.208.14.42 (talk) 22:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

message: Can anyone give me a solid reason as to why my addition yesterday of his criticism and allegations against him were removed within hours, and now there's basically the same information added and referenced just like mine? What's that about?- MisterMorton (talk) 12:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism and allegations 
Talk:French ship Neptune (1803)

message: The article previously noted this ship as second rate, linking it to 2nd rate.  That article specified that:
1. 80 guns qualified a ship in the Royal Navy as third rate, not second, and
2. Second rate was not noted for ships in the French and Spanish Navies.
For both reasons, I have modified the link to third rate instead.
— Mmccalpin 18:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marvin Lewis

message: and is now a total tool of Mike Brown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.59.103.164 (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did this come from? 

message: Belichick and other coaches' pages do not have this format. They are "currently the head coach of.."
50.245.4.140 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems weird that Lewis "last coached the Bengals" when he's the current coach, no? 
Talk:Charles George James Arbuthnot

message: Doing general cleanup on all the Arbuthnots. Non-notable information removed from the article:
*Baptised Lisbon. 
*Married, 14 August 1833, Hon Charlotte Eliza Vivian. 
Question: would this guy not have served in the Crimea? He would have been the right age (about 53), almost certainly a general by then. But of course not all units served in the war.
Herostratus 18:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I was writing a long reply about where he served, but seem to have lost it.
It would be interesting to compare the place where his regiments are recorded as serving, and where he was. For example, did he go to the Ionian Islands, or Ireland, or South Africa, or Ceylon? (regiments he served with did during his periods with them). I could add sources and links, but I would need to find them all again.  Good places to start are our articles on the regiments, and http://www.regiments.org/ -- ALoan (Talk) 20:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service 
Talk:Wallkill Valley Regional High School

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I have assessed this article as Start-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* The article needs cleaning up
* The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion
shirulashem (talk) 14:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments
Talk:The Comic Side of 7 Days

message: Do any of you know how long a new page take to appear on the search?
Paddy 18:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Wikipedia:Search#Delay_in_updating_the_search_index Wikipedia, the search index isn't being updated at present. --Whouk (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Search

message: When did the show end? F W Nietzsche (talk) 15:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: End
Talk:History of Tajikistan

message: The Soviet Section is, for lack of a better word, bad. To begin,The Tajik SSR did not have ANY official language. The section spends most of its time on the fate of Tajiks in Uzbekistan, and says almost nothing about Tajikistan itself, other than the statement concerning independence (which ought to be referenced). Crocodilicus 17:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet Period

message: The claims made here that a "Tajik Nation" was formed upon the birth of the Samanid dynasty is, as usual, dubious and ethno-nationalist. It should be removed from the Samanid section as soon as possible, or properly validated with reliable citations. Cheers--Jhelyam (talk) 11:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth of "Tajik Nation" coincedent with rise of Samanids? 

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atillata601 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: maps

message: The Shaybanids, Janid dynasty Khanate of Bukhara are all Turkic state or Turkicized state. Even modern Mongols don't consider them as Mongol states!!!. Identity of the Timurid Empire not clear!!!. Polaer (talk) 05:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Periods

message: I will be changing the dating system on this article away from the biased, Christian based AD/BC to the common era system.  This will bring the article into alignment with secular usage such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_India.  If you object, please state why you are ok with the biased system here. Eupnevma (talk) 20:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Before you go changing AC BC please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style, specifically MOS:VAR. Also, instead of hundreds of discussions regarding the changes on hundreds of different talk pages, get a conversation going here: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Thanks! Masterhatch (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change dating system to Common Era
Talk:Tack (sewing)

message: I just started this article about 10 minutes ago, and it's not done yet. The plan is to add "how-to" information.  Can we be a little less quick on the Wiktionary trigger please? 
PS This is in response to the cleanup effort on Tack. - PKM 18:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Wiktionary?

message: Would it be ok to mix tack welding in this article?  It's the same thing as a tack stich, only for welding instead of sewing, and I haven't been able to find it elsewhere.  For that matter, should we make a single Tack (fabricating) page, to include tack stitches, tack welds, and whatever other temporary tacks there are?  The Literate Engineer 06:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest keeping them separate, since the techniques and categories are so different, but including all of them at the tack disambuiguation page. - PKM 17:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Including similar activity from another field?
Talk:Adrian Erlandsson

message: I've made some serious changes - hopefully it makes a bit more sense now! I left the cleanup notice there, just in case... 13-days 18:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Hi there :-). The 'facts' section has been flagged as a trivia section and as such needs either deleting or incorporating into the body of the article. Adrian Erlandsson is indeed a notable figure in the heavy metal scene but the names of his cats or the fact that he likes to watch Weebl and Bob are neither notable nor encyclopedic. I therefore deleted these exciting titbits and got told this constituted vandalism. So OK... let's have some sources for why this information is notable or I will delete it again. Any revert will then constitute vandalism itself. Fun this isn't it? Or we could all play nice and try to modify articles so they sound like encyclopedia articles and not profiles from Hello! magazine. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 02:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Facts section
Talk:Salvatore Di Giacomo

message: This article is a copyright violation of [faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~jmatthew/naples/blog22.htm this site], but the author of this article purports to be the author of the website.  So, permission will have to be given to wikipedia to resolve the  matter.--Esprit15d 18:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright
Talk:Songhai people

message: Removed a lot of copy vio text cut-and-pasted from  among others.  --Dvyost 18:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: December 21<br /> revert

message: I deleted some repeated copy and added some links. This article starts talking about the people and then gets into the history of the empire - needs a rewrite and maybe transfer of some copy to the Songhai Empire article.--A12n 15:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits & comment 

message: The description below the main image states "A songhay women", which is gramatically incorrect and should be changed to "A songhay woman". Aleksa13579 (talk) 10:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 11:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023 (minor typo) 

message: The fall of the Songhai Empire 41.114.150.13 (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Wroxham

message: Currently this article describes Wroxham as a small town, but it is not listed in the List of towns in England article. Can anybody cite a reference to its charter as a town, or is it really a big village with pretensions?. -- Chris j wood 18:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: the local football team is "Wroxham Town"GraemeLeggett 09:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Also read the Town article, and market town. GraemeLeggett 09:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Wroxham a town? 

message: The article currently states:
:The combined Wroxham/Hoveton area is a local shopping centre, mainly due to the presence of Roys of Wroxham - the self-named "world's biggest village store". Roys owns much of the commercial property in the town. In fact, Roys of Wroxham is entirely situated on the Hoveton side of the river. Hoveton itself contains only a few local shops and pubs.
The last sentence would seem to contradict the previous ones. I wonder if it was supposed to say:
:Wroxham itself contains only a few local shops and pubs
which would make more sense in the context. -- Chris j wood 18:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 
Talk:Ned Block

message: Shouldn't we add some information about his famous debate with Sydney Shoemaker about whether "Absent Qualia" are possible? Acumensch 00:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualia

message: I am not entirely sure what all of this means, but I am pretty sure it is nonsense, and maybe it is also a personal attack. It should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.152.49 (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BTA's
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shelley Powers

message: "Gateman1997" refers to a "sock puppet army". What steps has he/she taken to establish that editors voting against deletion are in fact sock puppets?
--Amroth 21:47, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, not everyone assumes good faith.  You have to admit a flurry of new editors at an AFD is very suspicious.  That's why I went to the trouble of doing some basic research on the contributors to this AFD.  As indicated on the main AFD page, I doubt you and your colleagues are sockpuppets.  Anyways, if someone really thinks you are a sockpuppet, procedures are in place to deal with it.  BTW, welcome to Wikipedia and hope you stay.  Samw 02:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sock puppets
Talk:Subseven

message: Can you provide a source for this information? Kertrats | Talk 19:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 
Talk:Shakti Peeth

message: This article needs some work, but it will have to be someone more knowledgable than me. 
The list of Shaki Peeth needs some work to disambiguate existing links and there are probably articles for some of the current red-links.
Is the list in any particular (culturally defined) order? Otherwise, please place in alphabetic order.
The details in this article are repeated in Kamakhya, some sort of merge might be in order.
Gaius Cornelius 18:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Work to be done
Talk:Chadwick's sign

message: Wikified this article, was cut & paste job before. Smitz 18:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rex Murphy

message: I changed the page back to how it was September 15 2006. Whoever is writing all this libel should quit it.
**I'm astonished to see that there is not only no 'Discussion' of Rex Murphy here but no 'History' of one either. Surely the "I" (above) who has taken it upon him/herself to expunge the missing data would be more at home as a censor in a totalitarian regime than as a participant in the information age. It is extremely doubtful that Mr. Murphy, a public figure and ever-willing polemicist, is much concerned about being 'libelled' by any opinion expressed here. In any event, it would have been nice to be able to make up our own minds about the merits of the suppressed views.
I don't think the previous text was technicaly libellous from a legal point of view. It was removed because numerous contributors were making very unkind and possibly slanderous speculations that he was either drunk or mentally retarded or phyically handicapped. His accent has nothing to do with any disability whatsoever. Rex is an extremely intelligent person who simply speaks with a regional accent from Newfoundland and Labrador. Case closed. Mardiste (talk) 19:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to previous version. 

message: @Newf1990: Per MOS:INFONAT, the field is used to list someone's nationality if it has changed after their birth. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1949, and all its citizens became Canadian, including Rex Murphy. The field thus lists his nationality as Canadian. Do you have a reason or source for repeatedly changing it to "Newfoundlander"? Yeeno  (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have provided an explanation for Murphy's status as a natural born Canadian citizen after Newfoundland joined Canada, with cites to the Terms of Union and a related federal statute.  I believe that explanation is consistent with MOS:INFONAT.  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Bloody Kisses

message: The "Song Summaries" section is HIGHLY point of view and reads like a fan site. Should someone change this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.54.86 (talk) 01:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sharon Labchuk

message: Content merged into Green Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election. --GrantNeufeld 19:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone blanked this article on 7 October 2011 and no one noticed (or cared) until I stumbled upon it today. I resorted the previous version, and re-added in the infobox that was later added. Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanked 

message: :*"Islanders support democratic process in Ukraine as Canadian election observers" from CBC News
:*"Agricultural runoff complaints increase on P.E.I." from CBC News
:*"Potato sabotage traced to P.E.I. town, where everyone seems to have a theory about who did the crime" from The National Post
:*"One hot potato: Inside P.E.I's brewing battle over an 'environmentally friendly' GMO spud" from The Financial Post
:*"Googling for undesirable nominees" from The Globe and Mail
:*"Sharon Labchuk: What approval of GM salmon means for P.E.I." from CBC News
:*"The leader of the Green Party of Prince Edward Island is stepping down." CTV News Channel
::Missvain (talk) 08:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable secondary sources for improving the article
Talk:Adrar des Ifoghas

message: Is this the correct word? Currently we only have an article on the musical about Bob Fosse. Rmhermen 20:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, though geology's not my strong point.  I'm not the one who added that wikilink, though--let me double back and pull it from the article if that's where it's pointing.  --Dvyost 20:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I added the link. If it is correct we need a new article on what it is and a disabiguation with the existing subject. Rmhermen 21:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Fosse]]
Talk:Partitions of Poland/Archive 1

message: Lead sais: 
The three partitions occurred in: 
*February 17, 1772
*January 21, 1793
*October 1795.''
This is incorrect. Partitions took months, and years in case of the first one (Austria invaded in 1769 already). Do those dates refer to the dates Sejm accepting the treaties? If so, we need to expand on the third one. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:03, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Two first pictures are correct. Three last are wrong. The last - old (possibly from 19th century) - picture just shows polish historic chauvinism. 85.206.192.120 21:12, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to elaborate? I agree that the last, old picture, which is from an old British atlas by the way, shows a lot of the historical prejudices of the time.  If anything, it reflect pro-Russian bias, showing White Russia and Little Russia. I find it interesting as a snapshot of the historical view of the time. Plus it is a nice looking map. Still, if you find it so objectionable, I will unlink it. Balcer 21:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I am happy to report that in fact most Poles I know are pretty reasonable people.  Certainly I have not met any Polish bestial nationalistic chauvinists.  Are you sure they exist? Balcer 21:45, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree that especially the 1772 map needs some work. The other maps just need some minor tweaks.  I would suggest unlinking the map for now, until corrections are made.   Balcer 17:57, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong pictures 

message: Balcer - RESPECT! Zuch. Ačiū! 85.206.192.120 21:22, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nu i jak panowie?
Talk:Muhammed Suiçmez

message: Suiçmez (Pronounced Suichmez) - the pronounciation guide is ambiguous. ch as in chrome or as in cheese? I'm assuming the latter is correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.217.218.104 (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  yep it is like as in cheese.. --88.106.32.142 22:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He surely can speak Turkish as seen in the live videos of Necrophagist from Turkey --Betelguese000 (talk) 12:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

text: How come you thought that he is German? His name is Muhammed :) Plus, if you wanna see a better picture of him go find a free one and upload. I looked everywhere but couldn't find a proper one --Barkinyus ♫ contrib - talk 22:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: He doesn't have any formal training, he taught himself. I didn't put that but it is a justifiable comment... 77.98.23.57 22:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah right. self taught can't be formal... - 178.3.69.240 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity? 

message: I am very confused. Why does this person have his own personal Wiki page? Nercophagist, yes, they are moderately note-worthy, but surely not individual band members? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 01:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: Someone who was born and raised in Germany is not Turkish. Just because his parents are Turkish doesn't mean he is. That means he is a German of Turkish descent. He is a German guitarist. That is how the article should stay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.190.9 (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhammed is German 

message: If someone can accurately and clearly pronounce his last name, please help out by adding that pronunciation next to his name.  I'm sure I'm not the only one who's curious!  I know there was once a bit next to his name that said "(pronounced 'Suichmez')" but that's ambiguous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.137.248.46 (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: This article sucks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.51.119 (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suckage 