Talk:Windows Embedded Compact

message: No, No, No, No, No - The screen shot is of the Windows CE 2.11 *BASED* H/PC Professional, not Windows CE 3.0, or even the Windows CE core itself.
I'll try and fix it when I have a moment.
:It calls itself this way, as shown in the about box:
 Microsoft(R) Windows (R) CE, Handheld PC Edition Version 3.0
 Core System Version 2.11
:--tyomitch 15:11, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: H/PC Version 3.0, not Windows CE 3.0. HPC2000 is H/PC 4.0 based on CE3. HPC Pro is based on CE 2.11. Just as PPC is. --C:Amie (of HPCFactor.com) 23:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I know where the confusion comes from; I just worded the caption too poorly at first. Hopefully it's better now. --tyomitch 08:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great from where I'm standing. Might be worth moving it to a H/PC Pro article and putting a true Windows CE core OS graphic in there though. --C:Amie (of HPCFactor.com) 23:42, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Oh, so you don't actually have a H/PC?  --C:Amie (of HPCFactor.com) 13:40, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don't you mean that all the screenshots at HPCFactor.com are taken off actual H/PC screens? I thought that you used emulators for your shots, just like I did. --tyomitch 14:27, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The vast majority are from live devices. The CE4.1 ones are Emulator. The CE5 was an x86 'play' build that I ran up and booted onto a prototype device - hence the odd screen size (It's the 'dream res' for many users, but doesn't exist commercially) - hence I'm in no doubt over the copyright infringement. All other ce versions are real devices, mainly from my personal h/pc collection, but also from fellow Factorites. Kinda hard to run the largest H/PC site on the net without one ^_-. Pay our forums a visit if you're interested in getting one for yourself. --C:Amie 19:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, incidentally, if your screen shot in this document is from the H/PC Pro emulator; then the screen shot is of CE 2.10's core, not 2.11. --C:Amie 20:03, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot 

message: There is a "Relation to Windows Mobile, Pocket PC, and SmartPhone" section, but the relations ar still hard to understand. There is considerable variety of Windows Mobile and Windows CE implementation. Some versions/variations tree can help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.84.64.31 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete version history tree 

message: Is there somewhere I could find a comparison between the Microsoft CE OS and its competetors? (mostly i'm interested in Palm)  Some of the stuff here is pretty technical and over my head, and the interface features of CE are somewhat lacking from this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.38.32.5 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product comparison 

message: For those who are wondering, I'm not completely clear if all of these articles warrant merging into the main Windows CE article. However, there needs to be a comprehensive "history" page for Windows CE in the same way that Microsoft Windows references History of Microsoft Windows, which references various version of Windows (e.g. Windows 1.0, Windows 2.0, etc.). Just working on :Image:Windows CE Timeline.png was a huge headache, and dictionaries are supposed to remove these kinds of headaches. McNeight 00:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not objecting to getting such a page here on WiKipedia. A better index for CE is required as haivng CE3, CE5 and PPC doesn't do anyone any good, however as all the date information for your (very impressive) graphic was lifted off of HPC:Factor, I can't quite see how it was a headache. - C:Amie 19:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it wasn't a huge headache, but it certainly took some work to sort out. For example, the difference between CE 3.0 and Handheld PC 3.0 (which is based on CE 2.11) and all other marketing-type "distinctions" (Pocket PC 2000 vs. Pocket PC 2002 vs. Smartphone 2002, etc.). McNeight 20:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Support For the different versions.  However, oppose the rest.--Ljlego 01:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: It supports 256 priority levels and provides for priority inversion.
Priority inversion is not a good thing; it's not something you "provide", it's something that wreaks your system when it happens.  I imagine this is supposed to mean that CE provides "priority inheritance" or "priority ceilings" for dealing with priority inversion.  Or maybe, it just lets priority inversion happen; I don't know.
:Explicitly mentioned CE's use of priority inheritance to solve priority inversion problems. --Thalakan 22:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priority Inversion 

message: I thought CE stood for Century Edition.
That is not true. It doesn't stand for anything.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.254.40.134 (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Century Edition 

message: I believe my Scenium TV has WinCE. It has a browser, but beyond that, I don't know.whicky1978 talk 01:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RCA Scenium

message: I saw you mentioned there was a port of BeOS for Pocket PC... Could you please tell about this in detail/show your source for this?
--Kralikba 08:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BeOS for Pocket PC 

message: I'm having trubles finding whats the CE stands for, if anyone know the answer please add it to the page.
:Answer:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q166915 RN 19:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Microsoft likes to make fill in the blank acronyms.  Mathiastck 12:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I do not know what an initialism is, but my memory says that Windows CE was originally called Windows Compact Edition. Fortunately you have a book that is consistent with my memory. Perhaps the confusion is the result of confusing did not (mean Windows Compact Edition) with does not. Sam Tomato (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats CE stands for 

message: According to the Sega Dreamcast page, the Dreamcast did not run Windows CE, but _could_ run it. In that a few games used Windows CE but the game and operating system were on the gamemedium, not the console. Furthermore, according to the forementioned article, the performance when using Windows CE was worse then when using the native Dreamcast operating system. When I read the current Windows CE 3.0 article, I immediatly thought that _the native_ Dreamcast OS was Windows CE 3.0, which it appears not to be.
:Define the "native" Dreamcast OS?!  Aside from the simple menu for stuff like setting the time and Audio CD player which lived in ROM, it didn't really have one.  The menu stuff in ROM wasn't running when you booted off CD/GD-ROM for a game.  Some games were built with Windows CE (I know at least one of the Worms games was), but most of the games were pretty much just bare metal, without a proper OS distinct from the game code itself running.  Anyhow, not really topical to this page.  A CE port to the Dreamcast did exist.  I guess that's all that really matters in this context.  -- Forkazoo 05:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are anyone check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6th_generation_consoles#Comparison ? Check "System Software" there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junkcops (talk • contribs) 02:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sega Dreamcast 

message: This article claims that Magic Cap is the foundation of WinCE. Have any of y'all seen any other citations of this assertion? Or verifiable sources? --moof 15:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah. What a reliable source! Brainwashed hatred idiots' faeces
77.52.154.151 (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic Cap -> WinCE? 

message: It might be worth mentioning that Microsoft is developing a version of CE for this computer.
Gary 16:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is a "this computer"? Sam Tomato (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Laptop Per Child (OLPC)  aka the Children's Machine 

message: Windows CE is the OS on many touchscreen GPS devices from several manufacturers. Transplant GPS uses it on their RightWay product line. Their RW200 model runs Windows CE Core 5.0, according to a label on the back. Mio is another company which uses WinCE. There's a 3rd party freeware addon pack called MioPocket which adds many programs and features to Mio and some other WinCE running GPS devices to convert them into full-featured PDAs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.129.132 (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPS devices 

message: Should any mention of the Zune using Windows CE be in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.81.137.234 (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zune 

message: "Late versions of Microsoft Visual Studio support projects for Windows CE / Windows Mobile, producing executable programs and platform images either as an emulator or attached by cable to an actual mobile device". This sentence is quite ambiguous. Is it saying that the produced executables can be executed on an emulator or on the actual mobile device? Why is "attached by cable" thrown in there? Does the cable have to be attached for the program to run or is this an attempt to cram information regarding the method of transfer into this sentence? --DarrenW (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development Tools - Visual Studio 

message: Is this the right article name? The other windows articles are under Windows XP and Windows Vista for example, not Microsoft Windows XP or Microsoft Windows Vista. Abours (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Windows CE 

message: Request help for the Windows Mobile article. I started a discussion on the Windows Mobile talk page (link) about defining the difference between Windows CE and Windows Mobile. Maybe it's better to continue the discussion on the Windows Mobile page.--Lester 06:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defining the difference between WinCE and Windows_Mobile 

message: Does Win-CE have anything in common with Win-9x/me?
Does Microsoft issue security patches and updates for CE?
What file systems (FAT32, NTFS, etc) does CE support?
Can any application software (Microsoft office, word, excel, Firefox, etc) run on CE?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.122.22 (talk) 02:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any similarity with win-9x/me?  What about file system support (NTFS, FAT32, etc) ? 

message: Any estimates as to market share either presently or over time? -- Beland (talk) 01:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market share? 

message: I think that older Windows CE versions had a monolithic kernel and that newer ones have hybrid kernels, but at first glance the description of what kernel type CE has is a bit confusing, could someone please "clear the fog" a bit on this?
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.125.191.144 (talk) 23:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could you guys clear the kernel type confusion somehow? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Windows-ce50c.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The image on the right side of the article is heavily misleading. Unsuspecting visitors will assume that that is the default Windows CE interface, which it is not. An image of the default Windows CE desktop would be much more appropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.187.23.93 (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have moved it down. I am surprised no one else did so yet because it's very misleading indeed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christy35 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading image 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Windows CE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150717180230/http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/evaluate/windows-embedded-ce-6.aspx to http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/evaluate/windows-embedded-ce-6.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hpcarchive.info/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: User Tabdiukov stated that the screenshot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Microsoft_Windows_CE_Version_3.0_(Build_126)_cmd.exe_Command_Prompt_800x574.png used in this article shows a third-party solution, this is wrong.
This screenshot actually contains 2 software components:
* cmd.exe. This is a command-line program that interprets commands from an input, known as command processor, command interpreter, command interpreter shell or command shell. The Windows CE version of cmd.exe is an optional part (CE_MODULES_CMD) of the Windows CE operating system, available from Windows CE Platform Builder, as well as Windows CE Power Toys; which are all released by Microsoft, not third-party.
* console.dll. This is the console driver for Windows CE, which provides a GUI for users to interact with any command-line program, such as cmd.exe; it is also known as a terminal emulator. This particular console implementation is made by Microsoft, as an optional part (CE_MODULES_CONSOLE) of Windows CE. SymbolicTools did released a replacement console driver for Windows CE, called PocketConsole, that provided much more features than Microsoft's implementation such as colors; however the console implementation in the screenshot is not PocketConsole. Plus the image reference description states cmd.exe only, the console implementation shouldn't be considered in this case.
These 2 components can be found from Windows CE Platform Builder released by Microsoft, particularly the references can be found in source file  and ; unfortunately Microsoft didn't release the source code for cmd.exe and console.dll, only the pre-compiled machine code for each architecture that supported by Windows CE, in .
So please stop saying it "third-party", it was not.
Low power (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify Windows CE cmd.exe and console.dll