lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cad (disambiguation)

message: How about moving this to CAD (disambiguation) and redirecting CAD to Computer-aided design. On top of Computer-aided design, we could add the note below: 
-- User:Docu
:Forget the part about the template, it's currently still suffering from a bug. -- User:Docu
:: Looks like a good idea, since the vast majory of CAD usage is Computer-aided design. Mikkalai 00:56, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I moved it. Maybe  will work some day.-- User:Docu
Someone typing in "CAD" won't find CAD (disambiguation), therefore, I've re-redirected CAD to CAD (disambiguation). Edwardian 08:23, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I'm not sure if I understand the history of this redirect & dab page. Besides Computer-aided design, the only other thing commonly referred to as CAD is Canadian dollar, but there aren't any links here meaning that. So I'm restoring the redirect to Computer-aided design, OK? I've also updated the dablink/hatnote there. Ewlyahoocom 21:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2006

message: Redirecting CAD to computer aided design is not correct. There are many meanings of CAD including two very common ones (computer aided design and canadian dollar).  CAD should be a disambiguation page. Ewlyahoocom is incorrect -- the link Canadian dollar is there. Young7 12:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation is more appropriate 

message: I'd agree that most users would come looking for "Computer Aided Design", but I came looking for "Charged Aerosol Detector"; that page should be added. 63.78.254.2 (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2013

message: The 'cad' as described here  - as distinct from the bounder. 86.146.100.44 (talk) 13:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a dictionary SpinningSpark 15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Another usage
Talk:Astrophysics

message: How is it Possible of Displacement of Earth?? Surendar R (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page is for discussions of how to edit and improve the article Astrophysics; not for general discussions of the structure of the universe. Since you appear to be new to Wikipedia, you might find an answer to your question in the article Heliocentrism, which deals with the development of a Sun-centered model that displaced the Earth from the center of the universe. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is The Displacement of Earth 

message: Would an object with a consistent thrust gain forward velocity 2600:387:C:6C34:0:0:0:7 (talk) 00:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Momentum of objects in zero gravity 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kmijares (talk) 22:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment
Talk:Barycentric subdivision

message: The contents of this page was replaced because it was all wrong:
#The barycentric subdivision splits an n-dimensional simplex into (n+1)! pieces, not n+1 (and certainly not n).  The scheme that was described here is one of many subdivison schemes used in geometric modeling, but it is not "the" BCS.
#The section about the diameters of the BCS parts tending to zero may be correct for the true BCS (I will check it later), but is obviously wrong for the "false BCS" described -- which preserves the original edges, and hence the maximum simplex diameter. 
#The really essential section should be the BCS of convex polytopes, but the one given was too skimpy and possibly wrong. 
Jorge Stolfi 01:00, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced bad contents

message: The text of the article says that the sub-triangles should have one vertex at the midpoint of an edge of the original triangle.  The accompanying illustration seems to show the barycenter connected by perpendiculars to the sides of the triangle.  The picture is really pretty, but it should match the definition, or have some explanatory text added to show that this is a slightly different version of BCS.
Joshuazucker (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad picture? 

message: Could someone in the know find the time to put a proper definition in the article? As it stands it is incredibly handwavy and difficult to understand.
134.100.17.156 (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Definition
Talk:Army/navy store

message: I really don't understand your problem with listing stores, it is not an ad for the store, it doesn't endorse the store, it says the store exists, and links to an article on the store. Further, this is acknowledged in London (where a Department store has that name), but can't somehow be acknowledged in the US? Your reversions are inappropriate. Lists of individual companies are fair game in WP, see, e.g. List_of_banks, which has dozens of banks from many countries, some with articles.  How is this different? dml 03:23, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The section is not a list of stores; it only includes one.   If we had a "list" of banks which only included the HSBC, that would also be inappropriate. Markalexander100 05:49, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: If you want to add a list, add a list (I'm not going to create one because I don't much care if we have one).   But putting up an advert and calling it a list looks pretty bad. Markalexander100 06:25, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: The logo on my underpants acknowledges Nike's existence.   It doesn't acknowledge Adidas's existence.   That's why it's an advert. Markalexander100 06:03, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List"
Talk:Fourth World

message: Shouldn't the title be Fourth World, rather than 4th World? Alx xlA 02:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Am moving to the correct article tile and putting redirect from here. JenLouise 06:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New title?

message: There is a chapter on the Rise of the  Fourth World
in Castells' book End of Millenium.
i will add in the reference and cite it...
(Михал Орела 09:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuell Castells and the Fourth World

message: Should the Indigenous Australians be listed along the other indigenous groups? Alinor (talk) 06:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian aborigenes 
Talk:William Wilberforce

message: The article has issues with sourcing and NPOV. For example, there's heavy use of the 2007 biography by politician William Hague. More critical and scholarly sources (eg )  don't get enough attention and the legacy section needs expansion for Wilberforce's use in anti-abortion and other modern-day conservative/evangelical causes. (t · c) buidhe 20:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020|FA sweeps]] 

message: On William Wilberforce's Personal life
In 1788, at the recommendation of his doctor to likely treat ulcerative colitis, Wilberforce began using opium, which led to a struggle of opium usage for 45 years[1]. As writer Timothy McMahan King notes in his article for the Wall Street Journal, Wilberforce's diaries reveal that if he missed his evening dose, he would wake up sick and be “forced to lie in bed, great sneezing and other signs of spasm.[2] 
References 
1. McMullen, Michael D. "William Wilberforce: An Agent of Usefulness." Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, April 4, 2021, https://www.mbts.edu/2021/04/william-wilberforce-an-agent-of-usefulness/: https://www.mbts.edu/2021/04/william-wilberforce-an-agent-of-usefulness/. Accessed February 5, 2024.
2. McMahan King, Timothy. "Even Heroes Can Struggle With Addiction." Wall Street Journal, 12 July 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/even-heroes-can-struggle-with-addiction-11562969041. Accessed 5 February 2024. EAOOB (talk) 09:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Täck så mycket EAOOB (talk) 04:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2024 

message: I have reverted, once again, edits that seek to emphasize his conversion specifically to Christianity.  Not sure why this is needed given all the surrounding information and links. Not sure why becoming an evangelical Anglican isn’t clear enough. In any case, per WP:BRD please make your case here and get WP:CONSENSUS for your edits. Slp1 (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: The lede currently says:
This sentence contains violations of WP:NPOV, WP:EPSTYLE, and WP:NOR, the last one because it is uncited. 50.221.225.231 (talk) 06:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. The lede does not need to be cited, per WP:LEDE. It summarizes the rest of the article which is where you will find the several paragraphs with citations to support this sentence. Slp1 (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV, EPSTYLE, and NOR violation in lede
Talk:Private military company

message: "There has been controversy over whether PMCs in active combat zones should be considered mercenaries."
I don't see how, it can be a controversy and which controversy? Of who? And why specifically those in active combat zones? 
--78.193.35.108 (talk) 11:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Then what is the difference between PMCs, and PSCs? To me they're the same. As are gendarmes, and policemen. Just not used over the same missions. But apart from that, there's close to no difference.--Joujyuze (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Apoplexy

message: What is the point of the list?  Many people were recorded as dying of apoplexy? Famous and non-famous people who died of apoplexy? There is probably already a category for this - it seems pointless to list numerous people here.Parkwells (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, some of the people on the list, for example Louise May Alcott, died of stroke, not Apoplexy, according to their individual article.   Because of this, and the ambiguity of the use of the term, I do not see the value of the list. Bobsd (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, since apoplexy is more or less a stroke, a very common cause of death, this seems a pointless list that could run to many pages.  I propose to cut it. Onanoff (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Also agree - if we tried to list deaths from say, tuberculosis, we could fill many volumes.  Such a poorly documented list of un-notable persons just doesn't belong here. I'm going to be bold and delete the whole thing - though I suspect it'll trigger self-appointed watchdogs who monitor large deletions, and summarily revert them.  What I'm going to do isn't any kind of vandalism - it's consensus editing.Sbalfour (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: Um HELLO! I'm new to this editing thing, but I'm just jumping in without any REAL credentials.
I was just reading about the etymology of the term, and it occurred to me that historically, due to differences in DIET, choking was far more common than stroke, or heart attack.
Just a thought.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snuttjer (talk • contribs) 13:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Term 
Talk:Giacinto Scelsi

message: I think Scelsi's influence on Spectralist composers such as Tristan Murail should be mentioned. (especially works like Quattro pezzi su una nota sola)
:Please sign your posts on talk pages per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks! Hyacinth 00:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scelsi's influence/legacy 

message: I think the list of works is long enough not to be merged into this article. Hyacinth 00:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It would dwarf the text here. Perhaps somebody could collect a few of the most notable and list them here, but I think the full list should be its own page. Rigadoun  (talk) 15:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge: List of works

message: One source I know of claims he died on the 8th, not the 9th. What do other sources say? Toccata quarta (talk) 09:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Both dates are widely quoted. My understanding, though I don't have a source to hand to back this up, is that the number 8 had some sort of mystical significance for Scelsi, so myth-makers are attracted to the idea that he could have died on the date 8.8.88, but in fact he survived into the 9th.  With this composer it can be particularly difficult separating myth from fact.  --Deskford (talk) 10:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

text: He died during the night between both dates and never saw the light of day on the 9th. For the ancient Romans, days began at dawn, not at midnight as is our modern Western custom. So, even though technically he was still breathing into the earliest hours of August 9th according to our dating customs, in a sense, it can be said that he died on the 8th. The date 8.8.88 did certainly have a deep significance for him. He had in fact predicted he would "depart this world when the 8s align", and that date was effectively the last of his conscious life. How he knew about that, or if it turned out to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, is anyone's guess. I could dig up the references where all this is talked about, if people think it worthy of being included in the article. Uaxuctum (talk) 13:28, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Both the "real" date and the "myth" should be included, provided the latter has references. 64.85.243.248 (talk) 21:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 
Talk:Internet Speculative Fiction Database

message: Currently the ISFDB have refused to update Lee Mandelo's listing to acknowledge the legal and professional name change; Lee has acknowledged that the old name could remain as an "also writes under". https://twitter.com/leemandelo/status/1603165987356004355 
All of the past publishers are now listing the books under the new name, which makes the ISFDB's stance difficult to understand. 131.191.61.247 (talk) 00:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page is for discussing the ISFDB Wikipedia article, not for discussing ISFDB in general.  Sorry.  Dan Bloch (talk) 02:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm restoring my edit to the ISFDB page mentioning this issue. The reason for reversion is patently ridiculous considering the other sources considered "reliable" on this page.AdainPH (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refusal to update author's name change
Talk:George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum

message: Should there be any mention of the fact that President George W. Bush transferred his papers (as Governor of Texas) to the George H.W. Bush Library upon resignation? Micahbrwn 19:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: I am not in favor of this merge. They are two separate organizations, one a federal institution that is part of a larger presidential library system; the other is a school/department of Texas A & M. They do not belong in the same article.  Info999 03:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with the Bush School Article

message: I have taken what I hope is a higher quality image of the library: :File:George Bush Presidential Library.jpg. I will replace it here and all other instances of it if no one is opposed. Jujutacular talk 23:12, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead image

message: The library was a prominent plot out back marked in advance for both George and Barbara and is already the site of burial for their second child who died of Leukemia as a child. --67.6.32.244 (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future burial site 

message: when was the H W added to the name ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.29.110 (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: name change
Talk:Matt Foley, Motivational Speaker

message: Matt Foley Motivational Speaker was Chris Farley's best SNL skit. He played that part very good. Long live Chirs Farley!!!
I LIVE IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!!!!!!!!!!!
-----
I added information about Chris acting as Matt Foley before being on SNL and also the note about him naming the character after a friend. MardukZero 04:08, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Gay bathhouse/Archive 1

message: Maybe I should clarify what this entails - this is *not* mediation as per the Wikipedia:dispute resolution guidelines. I'm not a member of the mediation committee, there has not been a request for comment filed, and if it falls apart, the next step is not the arbitration committee. This is me, helping you two (Sam and EB) try to talk out your problems and get you to come to some kind of agreement for how to write the article. It's basically what EB described -  using the talk page to talk out your differences - only with assistance. What I'm offering is a fair and impartial third-party point of view. Now, if the both of you are satisfied with that, I think we can begin. Sam and EB - is this satisfactory to you both? →Raul654 06:30, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)
::Oh....  Um.  Hmm.  Well, if you can get Sam to actually clearly explain the specific points he feels are non-neutral -- something he still hasn't done -- I suppose that would helpful.  Given that Sam himself has said he's not the best one to edit this article I'm not sure what difference it's going to make though.  Exploding Boy 06:51, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)
:::That was also how I understood Raul offer EB. He was not suggesting formal mediation, but just suggesting to provide help in this public discussion, because clearly Sam and you are going no where :-) Anyone can do this at anytime. Not the mediation committee. All you have to do is to welcome him here on this page, and Raul to try to help you figure out the issue, perhaps by straigthening and organising a bit the points discussed, and you both to agree for a third person to help you organise your thoughts. Mediation is nothing more. May I suggest (as an external observer) that everyone is welcome to edit this article, whether they are gay or not gay, pro or con-gays, user of bath or non user of bath. Everyone has a piece of information and a different perspective to bring; That is the mixing of all of our contributions, so yours and SS ones that will give this article all its flavor. Perhaps the best way to proceed would be to start acknowledging this. Just my opinion :-) SweetLittleFluffyThing 07:13, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:Psychic

message: This introductory phrase is biased because assumes an individual or solely acting person.
Firstly, 'psychic' is also an adjective that denotes a phenomenon. Secondly, for there to be psychic relies, by definition, on at least two entities, whereby only one of them is visible in the flesh. Stjohn1970 (talk) 05:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: True. I can say I'm a fish. But if you look up fish it doesn't say people who claim they is fish. Nonsense. 106.128.97.210 (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A psychic is a person..." 

message: Typo in Criticism and Research Section:
"Investigator Ben Radford stats that..."
change stats to states. 140.109.103.218 (talk) 02:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 💜  melecie  talk - 02:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2022
Talk:National Day of Sweden

message: The first parag states that this became the official national day in 1983 by parliamentary decree, then the second parag says the tradition dates back to (only) 2004...
Where does this 2004/Olympic Stadium reference come from? Does it have any factual basis? Mrfranco (talk) 11:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something else is wrong here too! 

message: To me, "National Day of Sweden" doesn't sound right. That formulation has more in common with such phrases as "National day of mourning", "National Day of Prayer", "National Day of Remembrance", etc. Fêtes nationales of the type being referred to in this article (that is to say, celebrations of the idea of the nation itself) are much more commonly designated by the likes of "Belgian National Day", "Slovenian National Day", "Swiss National Day", etc. I therefore propose the article's title be changed to Swedish National Day. -- Picapica (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish National Day
Talk:Charles X Gustav

message: This section uses the spelling Kristina in the first sentence, then switches to Christina in the next.  I think it would make sense to use one or the other unless there is good reason to switch mid-paragraph. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and made the change to Christina as this seems to be most common English spelling. Either way, I think uniformity is preferred unless there is a good reason to switch in the middle of the article. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heir to the throne 

message: : Referring to Karl Gustav as Charles X Gustav is a modern invention. The Swedish kings Erik XIV (1560-68) and Charles IX (1604-1611) took their numbers after studying a highly fictitious History of Sweden. He was actually Charles IV Gustav.
This is a bit cryptic; the phrase "a modern invention" would normally mean that he was not so known in his own time, but the next sentence suggests that he was.  —Tamfang (talk) 18:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted & fixed - thank you! SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  numbering 

message: The recent move of this article needs to be reversed, or else all the Swedish kings and princes named Karl who lived before 1900 need to be moved from Charles ... to "Karl ...". --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Current naming conventions imply that you are correct, that it should remain "Carl." I will move it back, but if it happens again I would suggest getting consensus from the WikiProjects about how these articles should all be named. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrary move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Support for the move was entirely unopposed, consensus is to move to the more concise title in accordance with WP:NCROY (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charles X Gustav of Sweden →  – There is no other Charles X Gustav. Removing the “of country” is in accordance with the recent WP:NCROY guideline change. Robertus Pius  (Talk • Contribs) 17:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Sweden has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 January 2024
Talk:Nuremberg Charter

message: Changed some of the text.  Most court systems (even in developed democratic nations) don't use jury trials and have very broad rules regarding hearsay. Roadrunner 08:57, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Wikipedia article about the Nuremberg trials states that "The trial was held under modified common law."
This Wikipedia article states that the criminal procedures were closer to civil law than to common law.
In my opinion, this needs to be cleared up as it is not clear which legal system was actually the basis. Amp2001 (talk) 07:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal System ambiguity