Talk:Rancho San Antonio County Park

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved Outside2017 (talk) 21:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Rancho San Antonio County Park →  – This article covers both Rancho San Antonio County Park, owned by the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department, and Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve, owned by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. Titling the article Rancho San Antonio County Park with the current content is misleading; some of the content is applicable to both, and some is applicable to just the OSP. When visiting the parks, they seem to be one park, and all available maps are from Midpen ROSD and show both parks, no one seems to have a map of just the County Park. Outside2017 (talk) 17:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant the combination of the two is frequently referred to simply as the "Rancho San Antonio County Park". For example, . menaechmi (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, well, it's certainly not true that every source does that.  I'm wondering if there might be a little jostling here between Midpen (the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District) and the county parks dept.  They have some sort of shared responsibility for Rancho, but Midpen is the one that handles these preserves more generally, and to me seems like the more important authority to consider. --Trovatore (talk) 22:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh no, I never meant to even imply that every source did that (even though I said that exact word). I think you might be right on the jostling front, which is never helpful for these situations. My instincts tell me that OSP is the more encyclopedic route (given that it is a nature preserve and has , but there really isn't clear cut support in either direction, but all of the other articles on the Midpen OSPs are titled "x Open Space Preserve".  menaechmi (talk) 13:17, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

text: *The big sign at the main entrance says "Rancho San Antonio County Park and Open Space Preserve" (with "County Park and Open Space Preserve" in slightly smaller font than "Rancho San Antonio"). The article contains information that is applicable only to the Open Space Preserve, so calling the article County Park is conveying incorrect information. I suspect most people in conversation just call it "Rancho San Antonio" and don't bother with either "County Park" or "Open Space Preserve". The article should be either split or renamed: if not my original suggestion, then how about either "Rancho San Antonio" or "Rancho San Antonio Park"? - the latter being the phrase used on the directional sign on Cristo Rey Drive that points to the main entrance. Outside2017 (talk) 20:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

text: **"Rancho San Antonio" by itself might be a reasonable compromise.  My first choice would still be "Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve", but I could live with the shorter title. --Trovatore (talk) 20:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

text: **I should have checked first, wiki already has a "Rancho San Antonio" disambiguation page, so I guessing that isn't an option. Outside2017 (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

text: *Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_records, "Rancho San Antonio County Park and Open Space Preserve" doesn't seem very long at all. and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(technical_restrictions)#Title_length says title length limit is <256 characters. Outside2017 (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
http://www.openspace.org/CGI-BIN/press_releases/2004-04-27%20-%20Bay%20Tree%20Celebration.pdf link is bad, does anyone have a replacement?
http://www.losaltosonline.com/index.php?option=com_content link is bad, does anyone have a replacement?
References section and External Links section have 3 links all going to http://www.fodhf.org/   can someone who knows more about Deer Hollow Farm clean these up to just one link?
GLRX: why did you remove "Part of the Hammond-Synder Loop trail is temporarily closed due to a Santa Clara Valley Water District project" but leave the link that tells how long parts of the Hammond-Synder Loop trail will be closed? confusing as is...  Can you please either remove the reference link, or preferably since parts of the trail are closed and will be for a while, put the text back? thanks. Outside2017 (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 July 2017