Talk:Labor mobility

message: I did a search of wikipedia for uses of this two word phrase and found several that atually link to here.  In no case did I find any ridiculous concept of transporting laborers from one place to another being referred to as "labor mobility".  Nor would any rational and intelligent person concerned with real economics, political economy, or social systems use the phrase in that manner.  This phrase refers to the "right" and the ability of labor itself, i.e. to find opportunity geographically, politically, and economically. Sucinctly, it is the ease with which labor can move between opportunities, and only obliquely is it the ease with which labor can be moved between opportunities.  It is _NOT_ the ease with which aristocrats can move wage slaves around so as to make a profit.  The wiki police will screech POV when I do this, but please take the time to review the actual links to this page from other wiki pages and you'll find that I ain't the only dude with that POV.  Sorry, but that word "political" in front of that word "economy" isn't just window dressing--The Trucker 18:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Concept of transporting laborers from one place to another

message: There were severe problems with the section discussing impediments to labor mobility. I have started working to correct this but would love some help. I delete the prior section, which was mostly a rant against property rights and had very little substantive analysis of labor mobility. The only part I kept was a short note that the systems of property rights can be seen as impediment to labor mobility. I think a Marxian view of labor mobility is probably useful, but not as the very first (and only) thing people see when they read about common impediments. 
Also, some of the information from the more specific impediments sections on guest workers, the US, and the EU could be folded into the broader section on common impediments to labor mobility to make it more comprehensive. Gardner.rw1 (talk) 22:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Section discussing impediments to labor mobility

message: Dr. Ono has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Ono has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Ono, Hiroshi & Rebick, Marcus, 2002. "Impediments to the Productive Employment of Labor in Japan," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 500, Stockholm School of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Ono's comment on this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Labor mobility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160323032747/http://www.governing.com/topics/energy-env/north-dakotas-oil-boom-blessing-curse.html to http://www.governing.com/topics/energy-env/north-dakotas-oil-boom-blessing-curse.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425092317/http://pascn.pids.gov.ph/DiscList/d99/s99-01.PDF to http://pascn.pids.gov.ph/DiscList/d99/s99-01.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What is the year of formation of labour mobility 102.88.44.144 (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economics 

message: ECOCOMIES  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.0.84.237 (talk) 21:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECONOMICS