Talk:Shellac (band)

message: :Image:Excellent italian.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Excellent italian.jpg

message: Why is Shellac (band) in the living person and biography category? I notice that the Steve Albini page doesn't have the contentious information warning at the top, but this one doesn't. Can anyone explain this? Nigtv (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Two of the band members are still alive, therefore, it's tagged that way. Why wouldn't it be? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living Person? 

message: An IP purporting to be either Todd Trainer or Bob Weston has declared this band broken up. Do we have any citations? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's exceedingly difficult to imagine Shellac continuing without Albini. I haven't yet seen any official-ish statement to that effect (nor have I looked), but expect there will eventually be some confirmation that we can add as a citation. In the meantime, and in this particular case, I'd say it makes more sense to require a reliable source for the continued existence of the band rather than insisting on a RS to assume that the band is defunct. (For what it's worth, I'm also inclined to assume good faith and believe that the IP is in fact Trainer or Weston.) CAVincent (talk) 06:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not how WP:V, WP:RS, or WP:OR work at all. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My initial response is: I'm aware of that. My second response is: is there any verifiable, reliable source that the band still exists? Also, while I don't intentionally edit anything in violation of these policies, I'm sometimes willing to let other people's edits slide for awhile. This would be one of those instances. CAVincent (talk) 08:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Proving a negative is also generally not how logic works. Bands do all kinds of wacky things. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break up?