lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:London Canon Tables

message: I thought to use London Canon Tables as an illustration for the article on Eusebian Canons in Russian Wiki, but found that the numbers and even canon size and arrangement in them strikingly differ from the Eusebian canons, as given, for example, in 27th Nestle-Aland edition of Novum Testamentum Graece, or any other manuscript or printed canon tables that I was able to check. I tried to get some explanation for this in the literature, but only managed to find the following passage in Carl Nordenfalk's The Eusebian Canon-Tables: Some Textual Problems (J Theol Studies NORDENFALK, 35 (1): p. 96):
"[Eberhard Nestle] was among the first to call attention to the remains of three early Christian canon-tables which alone have been preserved from a more than usually splendid uncial manuscript, written and decorated on gilded parchment inserted in a much later Byzantine gospel-book in the British Museum, now
British Library, Add. 5111.3 But he never tried to make use of them for himself, his only remark being that they seemed to confirm 'what applies to so many de luxe manuscripts: that their textcritical value stands in reversed proportion to their artistic'. Had he looked closer into the matter, he would have made the discovery
that the numbers of these canon-tables, instead of being an example of careless copying, presuppose another section division than that of Eusebius himself (see Carl Nordenfalk, Die spätaniken Kanontafeln. Goteborg, 1938, pp.140 sq.). The reason for this startling deviation is still shrouded in darkness."
I think that this fact might be worth mentioning in the article. If you know any literature on this problem, I would highly appreciate a reference to it.
Constantine Sergeev 15:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section division in London Canon Tables 

message: The original name of this page was British Library, Add. MS 5111. Gospel Book.  As a result of this page being listed on VfD, I realized that the name wasnot tenable.  BL Add. MS 5111 contains parts of two Gospel Books, one 6th or 7th century and one 12th century. To be more specific, I moved the page. Dsmdgold 03:14, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
* I've moved the page to 7th century Gospel Book fragment (British Library, Add. MS 5111), which I think is more user-friendly.  It describes the object first, then gives the catalogue number to disambiguate it from other 7th century Gospel Book fragments. Warofdreams 14:48, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name
Talk:Baltic Cable

message: "The construction of the 380kV-link between Luebeck-Herrenwyk and Schwerin is not progressing due to opposition from ecologists."
Do you think this might mean opposition from environmentalists, rather than ecologists? (I would expect this if the cable were proposed in Britain).
Chris -Thryduulf 03:24, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecologists or Environmentalists

message: It would be interesting to include something on the investment: The cost, how it was funded, who shared it, and so on. - Pernambuco 02:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Financing
Talk:Archbishop of Uppsala

message: * An image of the Archbishops cross that archbishops wear, the one with feathers extending from the middle of the cross, licensed under a free license. 
--Fred-Chess 18:45, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo 
Talk:Clemson University

message: : 80% White
:15% Low-income
What single factor best explains the extraordinary low ethnic diversity and lack of low-income students?  Most universities on the west coast have nothing this polarized.  Could it be argued that blue states present better educational opportunities for their populations while red states only cater to the white and wealthy? Viriditas (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diversity and income 

message: I added a paragraph on the current nine colleges. But the information on the individual colleges may be incorrect or misleading. For example the justification for the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences appears to be reasons given for the former College of Engineering and Science.
Universities may change colleges and departments often. Trying to justify reasons to outsiders or even its own faculty and students may be a fruitless endeavor. KudzuVine (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colleges
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Libertas

message: Oh, and I have to add a caveat (unrelated) to the allegation that Libertas lacked good faith by calling Cmapm "Crapr". As Cmapm notes on their user page, "Cmapm" is a close Latin-alphabet approximate of the Russian word Старт. It is arguable that "Crapr" is also a close Latin-alphabet approximate and that Libertas could have been using it without deliberately intending the unfortunate resemblance to "crapper". Remembering that Libertas has claimed to be from the territory of the former USSR, this familiarity with the language is plausible and highly likely, considering that one unfamiliar with Cyrillic would be unlikely to think of that Latin form on seeing "Cmapm". That the resemblance to "crapper" was unintentional is (I think) a stretch, as I can't think of any other reason to use that form in light of the obvious alternative, but my inability to think of an alternative (good faith) motive is not evidence of bad faith. Further, Libertas is free to enlighten us in this matter.  — Saxifrage | ☎ 00:38, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
:I'll add a note about this in the RFC pointing here. RadicalSubversiv E 09:13, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cmapm" vs. "Crapr"

message: I am requesting arbitration, based on Libertas's behavior here, response to this RFC, and subsequent sockpuppetry (primarily Salazar and Ollieplatt). I would invite other interested parties to join in making the request, and, if it is accepted, in offering evidence. RadicalSubversiv E 09:15, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitration
Category talk:Latin alphabet

message: This category needs un-børking. If anyone has Wikipedia un-børking powers, could they please apply the automatic un-børkulator to this category. —Ashley Y 05:00, 2005 Jan 8 (UTC)
What is the difference between :Category:Latin alphabet and :Category:Latin letters ? --Hello World! 07:33, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [untitled]
Talk:AberMUD

message: Vax MUD was around at the same time as AberMUD. I played it. On the jaNET in late 1988. Why isnt it included? 213.114.8.106 (talk) 10:25, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this si the AberMUD article 8) 81.2.110.250 (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  VAX MUD 

message: With my authors hat on:
AberMUD has two core forms
AberMUD as an extremely silly addition to the HoneyBoard BBS chat system we maintained at Aberystwyth University. This wasn't that MUDlike and varied between the slapstick and the weird with patches ranging from SF (Ubik area) to fantasy.
AberMUD eventually was split from the BBS for code size reasons. After a while the game scenario itself got rewritten although a few bits were carried over. The main bit of the seocnd scenario is not as claimed in the article based on "MUD" but along with Blizzard Pass (Adventure Soft single player game) was drawn from a set of game scenarios whose play was primarily based upon what I learned at AdventureSoft. Elements of the command interface/commands are MUD based in inspiration but a lot of key stuff isnt. The combat model for example is based vaguely on D&D.
81.2.110.250 (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems With Article 

message: The article claims that there were three instances of Abermud running in Early 1989 - I remember that around that time there was also an Abermud 2 running on the Tardis machine at Edinburgh University, but I don't remember the exact dates so I'm not in a position to correct it properly. 217.43.41.239 (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only three? 
File talk:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.jpg

message: We could use a larger version of this pic... Anyone?  — Kieff | Talk 05:28, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
Er, it's bigger but it's a bit rectangular. Is there a big square version of this out there? Flowerparty talk 18:56, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted back to the small version.  It's part of our fair use justification that the image is low resolution. Mangojuicetalk 20:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image should be not "low resolution", but the lowest resolution allowing to illustrate what we are illustrating. For List of images on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band article, its primary subject definitely requires medium resolution, so faces would be clearly seen. So I'm going to upload higher res version. Netrat (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  When I try to upload a new version, I get "The file has no extension (like ".jpg")." message. Can someone help? Netrat (talk) 12:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Showing my inexperience with images. Clicked "rev" in file history thinking it would show "revisions". Sadly, it reverted! So, I've reverted again to the version before I intervened. Thincat 09:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Double reversion

message: These two tracks have articles which do not happen to include this image:
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song)
With a Little Help from My Friends Thincat 12:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other SPLHCB tracks 

message: Why does fair use allow this to be used on the article on Paul, and on album covers? It should only be used in the articles for the album, and the album cover itself.76.254.32.86 (talk) 04:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage
Talk:Cruise ship

message: There's a mixup in Origins about P&O being first...
 P&O first introduced passenger-cruising services in 1844, advertising sea tours to destinations such as Gibraltar, Malta and Athens, sailing from Southampton.
*current link is to P&O Cruises, which didn't exist till about 1977, when restructuring of P&O into several entities was done, instead to parent P&O (company)
*P&O Cruises is one of successors, and inheritor of cruising tradition of the parent company that did that cruise in 19. century, but it is not the same one
*it seems original P&O was called Peninsular and Oriental Steamship Company in 1844; I'd like to see when P&O actually got in use (but that is for the P&O (company) article)
Current contents of this article reads as if a company not existing before around 1977 made business in 1844, which would make smart 12 years olds laugh maddly, and dismiss Wikipedia as serious source of info when laughing fit settles. 
I propose change of link from P&O (which currently means P&O Cruises) to P&O (company) at first, e.g.
 P&O first introduced passenger-cruising services in 1844, advertising sea tours to destinations such as Gibraltar, Malta and Athens, sailing from Southampton
Later a section (or permanent link) to the part of that article with historically correct name could be created in that article and link changed to show there. I'll probably do the first change in a week or two, if nobody disagrees here. --Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins 

message: Are there any good statistics on how long cruises typically last? Does it vary by destination? -- Beland (talk) 03:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Length of cruise varies a lot based on a number of factors. Most cruises I say last in between three to seven days, but I don't know anywhere that would provide hard statistics on that. SpiritedMichelle (talk) 19:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duration 

message: Discuss about cruise ship 124.105.199.163 (talk) 05:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruise ship 

message: Cunard Line was started in 1840, four years before P&O Cruises. 2600:1700:E381:6AA0:B874:8704:FDEE:900C (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest cruise line 

message: I don't believe this: "Cruise ships may use 60 percent of the fuel energy for propulsion, and 40 percent for hotel functions". Here is a source that says 20%, which I find more believable:  GA-RT-22 (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  40% of energy for hotel load?
Talk:Chemical evolution

message: Moved this external link here:
* http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/838 - An article on chemical evolution by the intelligent design community
The very first link about a scientific concept shouldn't come from ID, a position that has not much widespread scientific acceptance.  If further links from the mainstream scientific community are added first, and in such numbers that reflect the balance of views on evolution amongst scientists, I would not object to this link being restored. As it is, it isn't very NPOV to leave it in the article as ID is very much a minority position.  --Lexor|Talk 05:57, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
:I don't like them, either, but I added it because I thought it was a good article.  (And because I hoped it would get some similarly good articles from the mainstream views added.)   - Omegatron 06:27, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
::Alright, it's not the first link now... --Emuroms 20:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The concepts are clearly different, so there should be two articles. As it stands, this article is really just a disambiguation page with no underlying articles, so the discussion is moot. I do not have the expertise to contribute any more at this stage. DCDuring 04:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this should be done. All information about chemical evolution is covered by Abiogenesis already. --Sulai (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree. HrafnTalkStalk 16:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Articles?
Talk:Chiaki J. Konaka

message: While it was valid that Digimon Tamers was considered a season for the western world (as the third season of Digimon: Digital Monsters), I don't think the definition of "Digimon season" in the first sentence of Chiaki J. Konaka's page would fit, especially for someone that only oversaw the Japanese original and not the dubbed one. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 15:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digimon season or Digimon anime? 

message: He did not say "he had concerns about conspiracy theorists getting deplatformed " do not put words in people's mouths. And the backlash against him was not from China, Middle East or Africa etc. it was mostly American/Western centric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoisi210 (talk • contribs) 07:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: the dictionary meaning of international: "involving more than one country". there was more than one country pissed of at konakas comments, therefore it was international. whether it was american/british/aussie etc, or russia, kenya, and brazil, or san marino, andorra, and azerbaijan it counts as international.Muur (talk) 20:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversy
Talk:Altitude tent

message: According to [:Category:Substubs]], there are two different Altitude tent articles. To see if I can test to see if there are actually two different articles, I am creating a test page for the first one listed in the Category. gK ¿? 05:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading the article, I think that an altitude tent is the opposite of a Gamow bag.  The altitude tent simulates higher altitude, and the Gamow bag simulates lower altitude.  The technical detail of how both are achieved probably differentiate the two.  Julius.kusuma 09:26, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I got that the two were essentially the opposite of each other, but the vague description of "The Bubble" on the Gamow page made it sound like it might be something like an Altitude tent. gK ¿? 10:33, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: GK, I have not used any of these things, but I know that the altitude tent comes in various forms and models.  "The Bubble" might well be one of the models.  A quick google search yielded this link which suggests that the bubble could well be one of the models.  I've heard people refer to the altitude tent but never an altitude bed, but this could be a difference in how different communities refer to the same thing, or different things.  :-).  Thanks for pointing this out.  Julius.kusuma 12:37, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding the link. It looks like it would be a good External link to add to the main article. From your link, it sounds like the "altitude bed" is a hard plastic contraption that lowers the atmospheric pressure (as well as the oxygen content?), so it's something like a hyperbaric chamber in reverse. Any soft tent can't decrease the atmospheric pressure, so it can only simulate the decreased oxygen at higher altitudes (so calling it an "altitude tent" I think is a misnomer, or at least misleading). gK ¿? 20:28, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Eric Bogle

message: Eric is another one of those musicians who have different years of birth, depending on where you get the info. Some sites list 1943 and some list 1944.
Catbar (Brian Rock) 06:14, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, the "1943" I originally put in this article was straight from the liner notes of one of his albums. On the other hand, his web site says 1944... --Paul A 05:14, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I've seen this before with Greg Lake, except that as far as I can determine, he doesn't discuss his age, so there's no official reckoning of the issue. It isn't uncommon for celebrities to fudge their ages. Catbar (Brian Rock) 05:37, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: Do you have some documentation for this? -- Metahacker 15:05, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Portable hyperbaric bag

message: Is there a connection between a Gamow bag and an altitude tent? gK ¿? 06:14, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  altitude tent? 

message: Does anybody know why the article features this 5 year old copyvio? ;-)  :commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Inflatedgamowbag.jpeg  If you can help - comment at the deletion request please. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:22, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Inflatedgamowbag.jpeg 

message: The article on the Gamow bag suggests that its predecessor, "The Bubble," would create more red blood cells to carry more oxygen to the athlete's muscles.  This is incorrect.  The Bubble was designed to create an increased air pressure environment in which an athlete could exercise, simulating exerise at lower altitude.  Using the Bubble, an athlete living in Denver, for example, could lift weights with an air pressure similar to sea level, thereby increasing the oxygen in the air, thereby delivering more oxygen to the blood, thereby delivering more oxygen to the muscles.
A very important point here:  exercising, like running, at high altitudes (less oxygen) increases the number of red blood cells and improves your cardiopulmonary system; however, the muscles get less oxygen, so they are not able to work as hard as muscles at low altitude.  In other words, a runner at high altitude will have more red blood cells and a better lung / cardiac system.  A weight lifter at high altitude will never develop chest, arm, leg muscles as big as his twin brother doing the same exercise and eating the same diet at a low altitude.
The Bubble was pressurized.  It simulated a low altitude environment in order to allow development of the skeletal muscles (arms, chest, legs, etc.)  If the athlete needing a Bubble also wanted to "increase red blood cells," that athlete would have to get out of the Bubble and go for a nice jog at high altitude.
As to my credentials:  I am a physician, so I have a passing knowledge of the effects of altitude on the body.  Also, I attended a lecture about the Gamow Bag.  The lecturer was Dr. Gamow. At a Winter Medicine conference sponsored by the Wilderness Medical Society.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nudemanatee (talk • contribs) 23:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bubble was NOT designed to "create more red blood cells."
Talk:New York–New Jersey Harbor Estuary

message: The map at the top is incomplete since it misses Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook. Sandy Hook is important in that Sandy Hook Pilots have the pilotage for the Harbor. rmo13 02:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: I don't think this rename was a good idea.  While the new title may be technically more accurate, it is also overly verbose and technical.  Are there any objections if I move it back to the original name?  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the rename? 

message: How big is it, by water surface area and volume? -- Beland (talk) 05:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Oxygen depletion

message: Also: There is a very POV statement in the last paragraph along with a link to an article in the German Wikipedia that I did not remove. I figured that all of that could be taken care of in the merge. gK ¿? 06:23, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I started working on fixing the poor English problem, but then discovered (as you did) that the Hypoxia (water) article  is covering the same material.  I'll work on getting them merged. - Marshman 20:55, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Also a lot of redundancy with Dead zone (ecology) article, although there I am inclined not to try a merge - Marshman 22:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: The depletion stub is a definition and should not even be in Wikipedia (see Wiktionary). The linkshould be removed. - Marshman 04:10, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

message: The correct term for this phenonemon is hypoxia. Why do you choose for oxygen depletion ? GerardM 18:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe because it also include anoxia.  The definition here for "hypoxia" is not the same as oxygen depletion - Marshman 19:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypoxia or oxygen depletion 

message: Anyone know why the first image will not display.  It appears to be present in Wikipedia and displays elsewhere? - Marshman 19:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image not displaying 

message: Why is this article specific only to a water environment?  Is the term 'hypoxia' not also used to describe a lack of oxygen in the human system as well?  Such as high altitudes? 68.92.147.72 04:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: indeed. GerardM 07:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other uses for Hypoxia 

message: I was surprised to see that these two pages are separate - it seems to me that they describe essentially the same condition, just in different organisms.  I reckon it'd make sense for them to be merged.
:—Preceding unsigned comment added by Napalm Llama (talk • contribs)  22:27, 14 June 2006
:I have adjusted the merger tags of both articles so that they both link to discussion on the same talk-page - please goto Talk:Hypoxia (medical) David Ruben  Talk  22:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merger with [[Hypoxia (medical)]]
Talk:Amelia Boynton Robinson

message: In the Early life and education section, it is stated that she was born August 18, 1911.  It is also stated that she appears in the 1910 U. S. Census as a 4-year-old child.  Both of these statements cannot be correct.  It is quite possible that the 4-year-old Amelia in the 1910 census is an older sibling who later died young.  When the subject of this article was born in 1911, she could have been named after her deceased older sibling, which was a common practice in those days.  The 1911 birth date for Amelia (Platts) Boynton Robinson should be verified from an independent source other than the 1910 census record.
EricWR (talk) 23:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth and census record

message: Toe tag me and I don’t have any questions to do with that work and I will send you a picture when I’m done bye to my friend who has the right idea and then tell me you need a new phone number and you send me your address when you send it when you send my address and I’ll get it on you when I send the pic to your dad when I get home 🏡 I got it I got you some pictures in your room and I’m 2601:589:4300:9CA0:0:0:0:4436 (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adidas