lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Make Way for Dionne Warwick

message: There are users who want to refer to this album as "... IS her third album..", which is incorrect.  This album, though reprints are available, is not current, is not on the charts, and the record company that issued it went out of business in 1976.  This WAS Dionne Warwick's third album, and though it may be tangible today, this album is history and should be reflected as such.  I will continue to edit.  Dma124 02:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of is in the first sentence is appropriate, as a number of editors have pointed out.  The status of the record company, the charts, and the date of publication of the album have no bearing on whether we ought to use is or was.  The use of was in the lead sentence makes it seem like the album is a historical relic that no longer exists in the present tense.  Also, the subject of the article should be the subject of the the lead sentence (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#First_sentences).  Strobilus 09:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current tense?
Talk:Affinity (law)

message: Coverage is UK law and canon law at present. Either sections should be added on affinity law in other cultures, or the title and lead section should be narrowed to reflect UK legal scope (and its derivatives) or canon law scope. Rexparry sydney 02:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that's fixed now. No mention of UK law; two wikilinks to Affinity under Canon law; and information on the laws of Brazil, South Africa, and the US states of Hawaii, New Jersey, and Michigan. Ken K. Smith (a.k.a. Thin Smek) (talk) 00:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global perspective 

message: The Jews of Eastern Europe (and perhaps elsewhere) recognized a type of affinity relationship that is preserved in the Yiddish language.  It is the relationship that exists between persons whose children have married.  This relationship terminoligy has male, female, and plural forms.  In a roughly phonetic transliteration, the terms are m'khutt'n (male) makhatennista (female) makhatunnim (plural).  So, if a man's child martied a woman's child, he would be her m'khutt'n, she would be his machatennista; they would be makhatunnim to each other. ('kh' pronounced like the consonant in the German 'ach', and 'u' pronounced like the vowel in 'look').  
The relationship was the sign of the alliance of two families.  My mother would frequently refer to my sister's mother-in-law as "my makhatennista".  Other than personal observation, I don't have any documentation: I have only a slight smattering of Yiddish.
Perhaps wikipedia could find room for this sort of information in among all the articles about porn-stars, knife collectors, video games, short-lived TV shows, and such.  Too Old (talk) 07:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yiddish affinity terms 

message: I find the term "in-law" to be unnecessarily ambiguous. Languages pride themselves on having an exact word for everything so that ambiguity can be avoided, but this term seems to invite the confusion. For example, I have a sister-in-law. What does that tell you except that either my sibling has a wife or my spouse has a sister? Makes no sense! I think that any relation you gain from your spouse should retain the "in-law" title; however, any relation you gain from your sibling should be an "out-law." Thus if I repeat my previous statement you can tell right away that my spouse has a sister. Similarly if I said, "I have a sister-out-law" you know my sibling has a wife. Maybe I'll send a note to the folks at Webster to ask them to consider this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.226.6 (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: I came to this article looking for answers to this kind of question: http://www.blurtit.com/q1003921.html It seems a lot of people don't really understand this, so I think an explanation from someone who definitely does would be appropriate. -AndromedaRoach (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Affreightment

message: The article is essentially a copy of the equivalent, very long article in the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, with a few subsequent interpolations. The Earwig copyvio tool marks it as 97.7% a copy, although the second paragraph of Bills of lading is new, and large parts of the EB1911 article are not copied. Strictly, each paragraph should be footnoted as such (with a small number of  tags) but that would be a tedious task and add little value. For now, the  will have to stand as an acknowledgment. David Brooks (talk) 23:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Footnoted now. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  EB1911 source 

message: Voice a concern 41.222.179.235 (talk) 05:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port documentation practice
Talk:Millennium (Front Line Assembly song)

message: I propose that Millennium (Front Line Assembly song) be merged into Millennium (Front Line Assembly album). I think that the content in the Millennium (Front Line Assembly song) article can easily be explained in the context of Millennium (Front Line Assembly album), and the Millennium (Front Line Assembly album) article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Millennium (Front Line Assembly song) will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. This is an issue of all FLA singles articles and is discussed on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Industrial#Front Line Assembly single discography. There is already a Singles section in Millennium (Front Line Assembly album). IndustrialGiant (talk) 21:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Agapemonites

message: Both this article and Agapemone seem to be about the same organisation or "sect". I came to add some material and a reference, but I am unsure where to add it as the longer page only says that it contains material from Encyclopedia Britanica and has no other references and the shorter article has two references but not a lot of content. I am unsure which article is the correct name and where I should add new material?— Rod talk 20:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In such cases of uncertainty I like to preserve the larger. Flipping a coin would do as well. To my unacquainted mind, the short other article seems a competent summary. Incorporating it, with its refs, into the short lead of this one, omitting repetitions, would approximately double the length of the lead. I intend to do this next week, if dissent or alternative proposals are not offered. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no objections I have now merged the text and redirected the other article to this one.— Rod talk 17:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Good going.  It slipped my mind.  Jim.henderson (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I've just removed the comment  "(evidence ???)" from the article. It is generally better to discuss on the talk page although "citation needed" tags can be added in the article. I've looked in the Evans citation Evans, Roger (2004). Somerset Tales of Mystery and Murder. Countryside Books. , and will continue looking at sources - if no suitable citation can be found the claim can be removed.— Rod talk 17:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at the wrong source. In Evans, Roger (2006). Blame it on the vicar. Halsgrove. . on page 26 it says "Agnes was not to be a member for much longer, Prince discovered that she had betrayed him, by contacting her sister and, it appeared, she was expecting a child and not by her spiritual husband." This seems to support the claim made in the article that "Agnes, the eldest of the Nottidge sisters, objected to the spiritual marriage which entailed a celibate life and became pregnant by another member of the community.[11] Agnes wrote to her younger sister Louisa warning her not to come to Spaxton." The test on wikipedia is Verifiability meaning that claims need to be supported by a relaible source and this seems to be the case here.— Rod talk 18:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Evidence" for Nottidge pregnancy 

message: Does anyone have a source for the etymology?  as far as I can tell it might mean "state (or condition) of apage (love) but abode? If not, perhaps we should stay "they named A, a word intended by them to mean" etc--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 22:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: uses "The abode of love" and in  says "Soon the Agapemone (Greek for Abode of Love) was being developed."  suggests the name Agapemonites might have come from flowers or fossils but rejects this just saying "followers of two self-proclaimed Messiahs".— Rod talk 08:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin of name
Talk:Government of Amsterdam

message: So, a new coalition was formed in Amsterdam a few weeks agohttps://nltimes.nl/2018/05/23/new-amsterdam-coalition-formed-presented-thursday, and we should update the Municipal Council section with the new Aldermen. If someone could help me find a list of these people, I'd be very grateful :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.144.123.179 (talk) 16:33, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal Council 2018-2022
Talk:Pebbles, Volume 28

message: This is the last volume in what is the best known and most notable of the dozens if not hundreds of series of garage rock/psychedelic rock albums that have been released from the 1970's to the present day.  Richie Unterberger, writing for allmusic says of the Pebbles series:  "More than any other factor, these compilations were responsible for the resurgence of interest in garage rock, which remains high among collectors to this day.  Though the lyrics are at times downright juvenile and sexist, the main attraction is the sound and stance, which anticipates the outrage of punk rock, but tempers it with tough British Invasion-inspired melodies, harmonies, and hooks, as well as fuzz-toned guitars, Farfisa organs, and wildly manic songwriting and performances. . . . Of special interest among the later volumes are installments devoted to wide-ranging obscurities from the European continent."  The latter statement applies to the 10 or so albums that are in the Continent Lashes Back series, which includes this volume.  No one is likely to list any of the Pebbles albums as among the 500 best albums ever – as Rolling Stone has been done with Nuggets: Original Artyfacts from the First Psychedelic Era – but their renown among collectors is arguably as high. 
I will try to come up with some references, but I would say offhand that only a minority of the hundreds of articles on rock albums have them. Shocking Blue (talk) 06:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (soundtrack)

message: Has anyone noticed that the opening notes from the love theme are identical to the ones from Titanic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surten (talk • contribs) 01:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Love theme

message: I have removed the filmtracks review from the "professional review" section as it is hardly professional.
It called the score to the first film "brainless" and called Media Ventures/Remote Control Productions "imbecilic", which is not something that belongs on Wikipedia. It appears more the work of someone with a personal grief with the studio than the work of a professional reviewer. RadicalTwo (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmtracks review
Talk:Play (S.H.E album)

message: Could we use an English word instead of zhuda,  the direct translation is main hit but this is awkward.  - PheonixUK
:Well no matter how you phrase it e.g. "main single," "track one," "main song" it's going to be awkward. Also, cpop forums have been using the word for a while now. - Pandacomics 19:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Lead single" or "lead-off single" is more common in the English world, and since this is an English-language Wiki, that would be the preferable choice, especially considering "Zhuda" isn't even an English word.--203.70.92.80 11:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Track listing - you listen TO someone PLAY guitar, not TO PLAYING"
- Actually "listen to x playing y" is perfectly fine grammar, and is simply a matter of tense.--203.70.92.80 11:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is a matter of using the infinitive. Pandacomics 12:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One edit comment: 

message: http://article.pchome.net/content-534818.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandacomics (talk • contribs) 19:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Reload (Metallica album)

message: Wasn't Memory Remains the first single? hence it should be placed above Fuel on the list of singles chart peformances —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.11.233.97 (talk) 20:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: first single?

message: Should the name not be Reload rather than ReLoad? Googling shows Reload to be the most common form, followed by Re-Load and then ReLoad. Alternatively, the article should be moved from "ReLoad (album)" to "ReLoad". --82.182.24.17 09:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''ReLoad'' or ''Reload''?

message: I have always said that Load and Reload are Hard Rock albums. Heavy Metal works for me, though I don't like it. However, Alternative Rock? I get that they were trying new things, but that's not really what alt rock is. Anyone else have a comment? I'd love to change this but I'm not interested in seeing yet another war of sorts. marnues 02:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem there is... there is no blues-rock on the album. There's heavy metal. There's hard rock... and that's it. All covered. No superfluity required. The Real Libs-speak politely 22:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Does anybody know the album sales statistic?  I'm having trouble finding it.  Thanks. Wikipediarules2221 01:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Album Sales

message: What's that on the cover? I know all about LOAD's cover but what's on this one? Hanz ofbyotch (talk) 23:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: i deleted southern rock from the genres because there isn't more than one southern sounding song on reload. MasterOfBucket (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern rock (?)

message: Is it worth mentioning that the tune of Bad Seed is played live at Fort Worth (cunning stunts DVD) when the band come on stage, although no lyrics are sung?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.10.140.199 (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Songs Played Live

message: Singles from ReLoad
# The Memory Remains (released on November 11, 1997)
# The Unforgiven II (released on February 23, 1998)
# Fuel (released on June 22, 1998)
"Better Than You" is not a single. --SuperVirtual (talk) 12:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles from ReLoad

message: How should the cover album be handled? Garage Inc that is. One disc is newly recorded covers with Newsted on bass. And while its covers, in broadest terms Garage Inc is a studio album right? Tapio1994 (talk) 13:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , no, Garage Inc. is a cover album; while different people and publications have called it an unofficial Metallica studio album over the years, that's not what it is. This means that the current wording at this article ("...Metallica's last studio album to feature bassist Jason Newsted") is correct. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 22:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last album with Jason Newsted?
Talk:Scandal (Kangta & Vanness album)

message: Hello! I recently created an article for Kangta & Vanness and did some reworking of this article to better flow with it and avoid duplication of data.  I also removed the image being used in the infobox, as it was violating policy (it even had YesAsia.com's watermark on it), and removed the "Kangta & Vanness album chronology" from the infobox, as it seemed unnecessary at this point, given KT&VN has only one album and probably won't have any more for quite some time (Kangta just began his two years in the Korean army).  I added a tidbit about the two music videos from the album, but further fleshing out is welcome.  I'm also looking for chart positions, sales, and things like that, so jump in if you have that information (sourced, of course)! :) --hamu♥hamu (talk) 06:20, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article revamp
Talk:Colorado Springs School District 11

message: *"Formulario para la Opción de Inscripción Abierta." (Archive) - "Distrito Escolar 11 de Colorado Springs"
*"notificación anual de los derechos de los padres de familia Año escolar 2012-2013." (Archive) - "Distrito escolar 11 de Colorado Springs"
*"Declaración de padres de familia / guardián legal para optar a no utilizar recursos de tecnología educacional." (Archive) - "Distrito escolar once de Colorado Springs"
*"Carta de acuerdo para Netbook estudiantil / Computadora portátil." (Archive) "DISTRITO ESCOLAR 11 DE COLORADO SPRINGS" and "Distrito escolar 
11 de Colorado Springs"
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish documents
Talk:Stan Freberg Presents the United States of America Volume One: The Early Years

message: The album was originally issued with W (mono) and SW (stereo) prefixes to the number.  The SM (special markets) prefix was given to the album upon its lower-priced reissue in the 1970s.  I have made the alteration within the article. StavinChain (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album release prefix 

message: Right on the front cover it reads "Sketches by Stan Freberg and Ken Sullet," but in this article, only Freberg is credited.Rich (talk) 06:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken Sullet
Talk:Steam Powered Aereo-Takes

message: The song 'Emanuel Cant' seems to be about the philosopher Immanuel Kant, does anyone know why he wrote it or what he means in the song? I study philosophy and have read Kant but I am still unsure. Did he read Kant?
--96.253.50.139 (talk) 22:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Immanuel Kant
Talk:Takin' It Easy

message: This song is references in Metalocalypse in an episode how there is no song about "Takin' It Easy". Nathan Explosion even points out, "Takin', apostrophe and all?"
This may be worth mentioning here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.160.146.26 (talk) 05:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metalocalypse
Talk:The Ringing Bell

message: I removed the word "vicious" from the sentence, "vicious review site."  That is a value judgment.
Jack Brooks 21:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vicious?
Talk:Tohuvabohu (album)

message: this page hasn't been updated in some time - it's less than three months from the release date and we've yet to see any tracklisting or additional information.  surely there's gotta be some of it out there by now? Filter1987 04:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Impeccable timing with your question... KMFDM Records issued a statement for Tohuvabohu including several track names, the cover art, and various other information only a day after you asked it!– 67.43.92.191 18:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: Oh yeah, KMFDM Records also released the cover art for the album, so someone who is able to should upload it. Just make sure to add all the necessary copyright and source tags so it doesn't get deleted by the same people who have been tagging/deleting several of the other album covers.– 67.43.92.191 18:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also wondering if this was the bands decision or the labels? JanderVK (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover art

message: I added a 'citation needed' tag to the tracklisting. I know a lot of the tracks on it are mentioned on the official site, but I don't see any actual track listing on there. Not being picky, but a source at this time I feel is appropriate :) JayjayAbnormal 00:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added in the citation you requested. The full track listing can be found on Metropolis's online storefront, although some of the spellings differ from the press release (e.g. "Superpower" vs. "Super Power", "Los Niños Del Parque" vs. "Los Ninos"). I went with the KMFDM News spellings since that comes straight from the source. We can always tweak it later if the final release is different.– 67.43.92.191 23:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing 

message: I've posted a question about KMFDM to the talk page of the group article, which possibly could be mainly about the album "Tohuvabohu". So I aks to pay attention to that entry. ThomasPusch (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singing in other languages than English and German?
Talk:Wonderful Life (Black song)

message: May be somebody could remember and add to the section "Use in the media": I am not sure exactly what year - 1988 or 89 - this song was used during the "Miss Universe"  (or "World"? again not sure) contestants defile. 
24.87.132.92 (talk) 01:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This appears in the Zucchero infobox but his version is not mentioned - is it ? -- Beardo (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zucchero 

message: Is AllMusic reliable for genres? For the album it gives: "Pop/Rock, Jazz". So it must be one, or both, of these? Vearncombe's obituary in The Daily Telegraph has this: "Its oddly uplifting lyrics ...  combined with Black’s melancholy croon created, as one critic observed, 'luxuriantly melodic pop that sounds something like a male version of Sade'."  Martinevans123 (talk) 21:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Valentin submarine pens

message: I took most of this information from the :de:U-Bootbunker Valentin article but a lot more needs to be copied over. --Philip Baird Shearer 09:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good article!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 17:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:de:U-Bootbunker Valentin]]
Talk:Station Theatre (Urbana)

message: I have not included a construction date (i.e., I have only included one as a comment that is not visible in normal viewing), since the theatre company gives one date (in the twenties) and the URbana (govt.?) site gives a different one (1889).  Kdammers 09:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

message: A recent edit says, without a source, that the theatre is no longer associated with Celebration.  How-ever, the theatre's home-page seems to indicate otherwise, giving as contact  "Celebration Company at the Station Theatre."
Kdammers (talk) 04:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celebration?
Talk:AI.24 Foxhunter

message: I've renamed this article "AI.24 Foxhunter" - the radar designation is more usually written with a "." than a "-". See, for example, here. Letdorf 09:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Ponnuki

message: Is there any reason why this has its own article instead of just being in the list of go terms? I think not but I don't know how to make that sort of major edit, so I'll set someone else fix that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:280:4600:5CD6:9463:66DC:FB89:8F56 (talk) 02:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)