Talk:Ted Haggard

message: Either he did or did not, utter comments on homosexuality while at the same time engaging in the self same.
Mike Jones on Ted Haggard and Hypocrisy {{cite truthdig|http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20070707_mike_jones_on_ted_haggard_and_hypocrisy/ |title|title=Mike Jones on Ted Haggard and Hypocrisy
Haggard: 'I am a deceiver and a liar' {{cite usatoday|http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-11-05-haggard-church-stunned_x.htm|title|title=Haggard: 'I am a deceiver and a liar' Viralmeme (talk) 18:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being judgemental 

message: A few days later Haggard resigned from all of his leadership positions after he admitted sexual immorality and methamphetamine use.
That's a bit judgemental, no? I'm changing the wording. --DearPrudence (talk) 23:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sexual immorality"? 

message: I think that this article should bear in mind the points raised by Men who have sex with men article. It is quite obvious from reading this article that this article is edited/guarded by the religiously minded. Editors need to distinguish between the various degrees of sexuality. At the moment, as South Park's Mr Mackey might "It's bad umkay", but that is not examining the issue. "Men who have sex with men" practice a particular form of behaviour but do not associate with any given social name for the act i.e. gay/LBG/bisexual etc. It is worth considering and is an already agreed/consensus discussed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.134.163 (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Men who have sex with men" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ted Haggard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090303081451/http://www.krdo.com:80/Global/story.asp?S=8556903 to http://www.krdo.com/Global/story.asp?S=8556903&nav=menu552_1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090204060159/http://www.krdo.com:80/Global/story.asp?S=9729019 to http://www.krdo.com/Global/story.asp?S=9729019
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110130000422/http://www.cbsnews.com:80/8301-31749_162-20029939-10391698.html to http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20029939-10391698.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Section 2.1 of this article contains a large number of references to a polygraph test.  The entire civilised world (Entire?  No, one small area of North America still holds out against the science) knows that these are unreliable, and very few countries would employ a polygraph other than as a toy.  Should this be mentioned/explicitly stated in reference to the test that Mr Jones decided to take?
Another concern regarding polygraphs is that they allegedly need to be 'tuned' to the individual and need to be operated by a 'trained' operator.  These 'operators' cannot explain or apply a standard and/or objective means of reading the machine's output, and it appears that the operator is as important as the machine in 'detecting' falsehoods.  In other words, the implication in this article is that a polygraph machine determined 'truth' and 'falsehood' - the reality is much more complicated and bears little relationship the machine.  I suggest that this should be clearly stated in the article, or that references to truth, lies and polygraphs be removed entirely as unverifiable. Ambiguosity (talk) 03:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *Whether polygraphs are or are not accurate is completely immaterial. The fact, as reported by reliable sources, is that polygraphs were administered and the results were reported in the media. What is in this article is what was reported. Your suggested additions are SYNTH. And what on earth does that link to TV Tropes about a comic book have to do with this? Niteshift36 (talk) 03:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A polygraph? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Ted Haggard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0%2C1299%2CDRMN_15_5115225%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107210059/http://wm.kusa.gannett.edgestreams.net/news/1162599872745-11-03-06-haggard-5p.wmv to http://wm.kusa.gannett.edgestreams.net/news/1162599872745-11-03-06-haggard-5p.wmv
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0%2C1299%2CDRMN_15_5112770%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.9news.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=68347
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3422
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kansascity.com/2010/06/02/1987867/haggard-makes-it-official-hes.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: If the subject "admitted to [.. participating] in some sexual activity with" two men, doesn't that automatically place him in an LGBT category? --82.21.97.70 (talk) 10:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Possible vandalization. I don’t see any source of him having breast enhancement surgery, as referenced in the intro. 136.26.68.231 (talk) 04:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breast enhancement surgery?