Talk:Open Sound System

message: This article is totaly Linux-centric.  It assumes OSS is a Linux thing, but it supports 11 different Unices (including *BSD).  It also says it's deprecated in favour of ALSA.  This is true in the case of Linux, but not in other context.
I'm going to change the article to have a neutral, Unix-centered POV.
(I will keep, however, Linux-specific bits in a separate paragraph.  I think it's worth mentioning ALSA too.)
nyu 15:35, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Linux-centric?

message: Actually, although OSS may not be a Linux thing, it's definitely not the standard on Unix operating systems.  Most Unix operating systems *don't* use it, and Sun's Audio interface, as contributed back to CSRG, is very common and better designed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.52.242 (talk) 04:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not linux-centric?

message: It's also wrong.  'The project was initially free software, but following the project's success, Savolainen started the company 4Front Technologies and made his support for newer sound devices and improvements proprietary' is incorrect.  From Savolainen's blog: 'In autumn 1995 I was contacted by Dev Mazumdar who had made a SB Pro (MCA) driver for AIX. Soon after that we decided to join forces and I become an eployee of Dev’s 4Front Technologies.'  Dev Mazumdar started the company. David Chisnall (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: And Wrong

message: QNX Neutrino 6.x also implements the ALSA interface, using only the user space library from the ALSA project. The ALSA kernel models are in this case replaced by a set of QNX-specific servers. QNX does not include the ALSA library directly in its Momentics IDE package because of licensing issues, though. I don't have time to update the article. The documentation available on the QNX homepage is a good source of information about this. gmueckl 12:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than one implementation of the ALSA interface 

message: It would be helpful to see a discussion of why OSS4 was re-introduced into the Linux kernel, and whether it now supports suspend and resume, the lack of which led to it being superseded by ALSA.  I couldn't find any discussion of suspend and resume on the 4-front site. Ddssff (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  OSS4 Re-introduced to Linux Kernel 

message: Does it lack features compared to ALSA?  Like multiple apps playing to multiple devices at the same time?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.58.244 (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. In fact it surpasses ALSA in this area, as it can play more types of apps at the same time, and provide each with its own volume control 85.250.166.120 (talk) 20:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Features 

message: What is the point of this section? Wikipedia is full of articles citing advantages & disadvantages, but this? It's rubbish. I think it should be removed. OSS is used among many other systems, maybe not the 4Front implementation, but the API is. This is becoming very Linux biased.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agh (talk • contribs) 11:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Open Sound System. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.linuxpr.com/releases/9766.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: OSS both as API and as software has been criticized by some developers, such as Paul Davis and Lennart Poettering.
As a reference for Paul Davis criticism, his article A Tutorial on Using the ALSA Audio API is being referenced.  However, in that article I cannot find any mention of "OSS" or "Open Sound System".  Please clarify the evidence of his criticism with a more specific reference or remove the claim that he criticised it. --DevUrandom (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  OSS in relation to ALSA