lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hitotsume-kozō

message: Often I read comments in the Talk Page expressing dismay that some editor went through an article and sprinkled it with  on every line. "If you don't like uncited pages, cite them yourself," seems to be the sentiment. To which I say, "gladly, show me any book about Hitotsume-kozō and I'll do the hard work myself." It seems this article was plagiarized from Obakemono Project. I reworked several of the sentences, but can find no independent articles indicating Hitotsume-kozō was indeed part of Japanese folklore. I'd love to be proven wrong, I just don't know where to look. Duende-Poetry (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but really only one "Citation needed" template per sentence is needed. I removed a few, as they were redundant. Boneyard90 (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: So Many Articles, So Few Sources
Talk:Registrar General of Canada

message: I rewrote the article; the English in some areas of the old article was questionable, and it seemed somewhat incomplete.  I would like to thank Fat pig72 for the work that he [or she] had already invested into this article, and to ensure him [or her] that the information already included in the article has been fully re-incorporated. Paradokuso 00:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article overhauled 
Talk:Empty Spaces

message: Where does it say "Hello hunters?" How do you know it's James Guthrie who has taken the call?
Roger's wife was Carolyne. NH79.121.143.143 (talk) 23:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backward message 

message: It would be great to upload one. One link was broken. Pronoein (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound file of the Backward message

message: I've got three "words" for this: 
LIBEST . . . SPACEMENT . . . MONITOR!
I trust that says it all!
(Okay, okay. My point is, this sounds like a misunderstanding, just as "Libest Spacement Monitor" was a bootlegger's misunderstanding of Roger Waters announcing "Nicholas Mason on the drums!" For some reason, it gets accepted as fact, when it's totally nonsensical. "Luka hunters" makes no sense, and I'm sure he's saying something more normal.)
--Ben Culture (talk) 12:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hello Luka [hunters]"?!? Yeah, right.
Talk:One of My Turns

message: I would really hate to just remove that sentence from this article. While it is true that Waters does end on that note (as the ninth of a G minor ninth chord!) the sentence as worded is misleading. That A isn't a climactic "high" note, and, in fact, the majority of the song is sung on the note of B-flat, the next HIGHEST note. (The main chord progression is E-flat to B-flat, for which he sings the B-flat, followed by a D minor, for which he sings mostly the A.)
What I'm saying is, this sentence needs to be radically reworded. It's worth talking about Waters's unusual voice and high range (Ever notice that nobody who covers "Hey You" can sing "Don't tell me there's no hope at all" the way Waters did? That's getting into the relevant article when I get to it!) But he sings higher-pitched melodies than "One of My Turns", getting all the way to the 1st C above middle C in "Don't Leave Me Now", "Hey You", "Bring the Boys Back Home" and several parts of The Pros and Cons of Hitch Hiking (this is not meant as an exhaustive list).
Oh, and how about this little fact? That A he ends on? IS THE SAME NOTE HE BEGINS THE NEXT SONG ("Don't Leave Me Now") ON! Wow, eh? Should that go in the articles?
:--Ben Culture (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, as many times as the whole "Isn't this where ..."/"... we came in?" thing gets put into Wall-related articles (it's in at least three, I believe), I think this high-A thing is worth a mention in both songs's articles. --Ben Culture (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The song features one of Waters' most strenuous recorded vocal workouts, with him ending at one of the highest tones of his register, the A above middle C."
Talk:List of United States representatives from Texas

message: Where is Roy Mark Hofheinz, Texas Rep 1934-1936
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/fho87 2602:306:37DF:AB00:95C3:9E0C:DBE7:1790 (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Hungarian-language radio stations

message: i've removed the previous listing of "hungarian radio stations" (see earlier version) because it seemed to be a random selection of stations: national and regional, large and small - also quite brief. there are about a hundred stations licensed in hungary (my estimate) and many are regional broadcastings of larger stations, while many others are really small local stations (eg. university radios etc.) and of course there are a number of temporarily licensed, unlicensed or pirate stations as well as countless internet-broadcasting "radios".
the ones now featured are a) what most Hungarian people listen to; b) the three state-subsidised stations (Bartók, Kossuth and Petőfi); 3) two of the first-ever budapest community stations that still operate (namely Tilos and Civil);
so there are really a lot of smaller stations not listed - my aim was a representative list rather than a complete one.
--ddani 00:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mikal Gilmore

message: I think the redirect is broken....  Hcobb (talk) 16:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Michael Gilmore]], the Defense Department’s director of operational test and evaluation. 

message: I removed the following statement from this article for lack of a reliable source and citation to such. 
* He is currently working on musician/actor AF's second album titled Cliche.
I can find zero reference to associate Mr. Gilmore with any musical act, or individual musician going by "AF" in any form.  Since this was a very recent edit (and error tag) I felt it best to place the topic here.  If a credible source is located and a citation is included the information can be returned to the article. ---> Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 02:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from article - unsourced
Talk:Akiyama Yoshifuru

message: The education section reads like a hagiography. The editor who wrote it cited it in its entirety from a brief speech given by the principle of the school Akiyama led in 2020. This is far from the universal application and influence on the Japanese education system attributed to him in the body of the article. Relm (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking a little deeper it appears that the entirety of both sections are google translated versions from the Japanese and Korean pages - but missing the citations of either page. I hesitate to remove the section, but do believe someone better versed in Japanese and Korean should take a look at the citations and rewrite the section. Relm (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with Education Section
Talk:Vexel

message: Are all those "citation needed" tags necessary? Some of the things they are attached to are simple facts man, you can tell just by looking, you dont need someone to tell you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.231.123.64 (talk • contribs) 20:16, Jul 25, 2006 (UTC)
: I agree with you and I've deleted the tags. --Remi de 22:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: This page is perhaps best suited for the wiktionary since it is a neologism.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms
This appears to depend on the amount of secondary sources about the term.  I suppose there are enough, but the policy doesn't define "enough". 76.193.114.134
Totally agree. Also, in the description of the difference in the image they are both created using shape layers unless the "vexel" was created with paintbrushes(...etc). One just appears to have a higher resolution. RicoBlox 18:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to wiktionary? 

message: I removed the section:
Also, with the advent of the Internet, 300 dpi is no longer considered a must in amateur digital art. 72 dpi is considered sufficient for most vexels, since it will not appear in print in most cases. Indeed, since most vexels are tracings, printed versions would likely constitute copyright infringement, unless the use of the image fell under fair use (in the United States).
because: DPI has no matter on the internet. It can be 72, it can be 300, it can be 300,000 and with a corresponding width/height, it will be the same exact pixel size. DPI and document size does not matter on the internet, and it should not be included. Copyright infringement can happen anywhere, not just in print, obviously. The copyright part should not even be included, because it sort of assumes that vexels are made from OTHER people's work. When in a traditional case, it would be assumed that the artist would use his or her own work to create a vexel. Copyrights need not to be included unless it becomes an issue in the vexel community. --Dan LeveilleTALK 03:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright/DPI section removed 

message: The first link  probably requires a log-in to access. Hence, I am marking it as a defunct reference. If someone can provide an open reference, kindly replace it. musically_ut (talk) 06:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  403 Forbidden on a Reference link
Talk:Texas's 14th congressional district

message: Desperately needed herein. Nicmart (talk) 03:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic info 
Talk:Texas's 17th congressional district

message: Texas's 17th Congressional District has changed is boundaries according to http://gis1.tlc.state.tx.us/ the District Viewer site.   The boundaries now include parts of northern Lee and Travis Counties.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfrickssg (talk • contribs) 17:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scott Sharp

message: Should a seperate page be created? Seeing as the team is now more than four years old now and has had a prominant role in the American Le Mans Series and Tudor United SportsCar Championship I think a seperate, more detail page is needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnercksn (talk • contribs) 17:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme Speed Motorsports 

message: A few basics: The order of the materials goes, in overall methodology that has been developed, in chronological progression of the driver's career. In the case of Michael Andretti, his CART stats are given in two segments, from 1984-1992 and 1994-2002, with a break occurring for the 1993 Formula One stats which are inserted between. As such, the Touring Car information needs to be (and I have moved it to) the bottom of the listing, as, if he is going to race there full time in '08, it will be after the events of '07 and before. Also, there is a bronze color given in the information for his position in the standings. While Sharp is, granted, a decent if not fine driver, the bronze color indicates third position...which is not yet possible, since no race has yet been run, correct? If I am wrong on that point, please insert the points information proving his 3rd-position status, and only then return the bronze color to the points and standings column. Thank you for slogging through this info. --Chr.K. (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touring Car Racing addition 

message: The page in question states, "Scott Sharp is the only driver to have driven in at least one race in the first 12 seasons of IndyCar competition".  Not true.  Buddy Lazier also has.  I'm not sure what everybody wants done with that line, so I'm leaving it for the moment.
--Arenasnow 22:10, 26 March 2008
:Corrected -Drdisque (talk) 03:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 
Talk:Bobby Unser

message: bio: 6 lines
a bit on indy and others without stats 
criminal charge: 9 lines
was a driver or a bandit ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.149.168.228 (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  o please.. 
Talk:Texas's 20th congressional district

message: Are we allowed to use the map image?--Mellowgirl912 (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas's 25th congressional district

message: Needs a map of the new boundaries. Churchh 16:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to the person who added the new map.  Now it needs a summary of the 2006 election results. Churchh 12:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: The term "majority" in the election results chart is misleading.  It should be called "margin of victory" instead.  However, no such template exists in Wikipedia, and I have no idea how to create one or to rename the one currently called "majority."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.26.60.192 (talk) 21:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, it's not very misleading - Doggett won more than 50%+1, so he had a majority over his nearest opponent. I think the terminology is more British than anything, where the concept of "simple majority" is what we refer to as a plurality. I do not recommend renaming or modifying that template (that might make a bunch of people upset if you don't ask first), but you can go here - Template:Election box majority - to have a starter for a new template and change a few words to your liking. --Souperman (talk) 04:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "majority"

message: I was looking at the ethnicity makeup of his constituents, and they don't add up to 100%: 66.5% White, 7.6% Black, 1.2% Asian, 66.8% Hispanic, 0.6% Native American, 0.4% other. If there is not an error here, could someone explain to me how these demographics work? Thanks! Lithrium (talk) 17:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In US Census Bureau terminology, Hispanic vs non-Hispanic is a cross-classification which is completely separate from the race catgegory... Churchh (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics?

message: Needs map of new boundaries for 2012 election. Churchh (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012
Talk:Texas's 28th congressional district

message: Shouldn't the map of the district be at the top of the infobox on the right, as is the standard for congressional district articles?J'onn J'onzz (talk) 02:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas's 29th congressional district

message: 55% white, but 66% Hispanic? Somebody transcribed those census numbers incorrectly. 69.196.171.42 (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. There are Hispanics who are White, and Hispanics who are not. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas's 2nd congressional district

message: Article should be renamed from Texas's 2nd congressional district to Texas' 2nd congressional district, the second s is unnecessary. xeryus (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming the Article 

message: The information on this page is out of date. Much of the area on the eastern section of this district is now contained in the 14th Congressional district (http://www.house.gov/htbin/findrep?ZIP=77706&Submit=FIND+YOUR+REP+BY+ZIP) instead, and there have been some other significant changes. Having this out of date information is very confusing. Although the article mentions the 2012 redistricting, it is still using an out of date map and out of date description of the district. aelfwyne (talk) 19:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate information 
Talk:Texas's 32nd congressional district

message: White this was an affluent suburban traditionally Republican turned swing district in 2018 and 2020, redistricting heavily altered the district. It's now an urban-suburban majority-minority safely Democratic District that has little resemblance to its previous iteration. 108.230.248.68 (talk) 17:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's out of date to call this a swing district
Talk:Texas's 8th congressional district

message: Please stand up and support a good conservative candidate for Speaker.   I liked Scalise and Jordan but to some they are not good enough.  We cannot have 100% of what we want.  Just like marriage we have to compromise and think what is best for our spouse, marriage and family. 209.169.99.111 (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican Speaker of the House
Talk:Texas's 9th congressional district

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.S. Representative District 9. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs)  07:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "U.S. Representative District 9" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Euro-Mediterranean free trade area

message: Do not support merge with Agadir Agreement. Do support merge with Barcelona process. --Boson 22:27, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merges 
Talk:Honda Acty

message: Hi to all. I think the third generation was launched in May 1999, not Dec 2008.http://www.honda.co.jp/news/1999/4990527a.html-North wiki (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I reckon that the Dec 08 date referred to the then current pricing, it was not meant to suggest that 2008 was the intro date for the 3rd gen Acty. Anyhow, I updated a bunch and also added this source, cheers,  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third generation 

message: There seem to be several mistranslations. For example "Fuel economy was further increased by the use of electric power steering." I seriously doubt that. Also, the statement "...crash mitigation brakes that must be installed sequentially,..." which doesn't make sense. (I couldn't check the original references since I don't read Japanese. ExpatSalopian (talk) 20:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pitfalls of translation
Talk:Honda Ascot

message: The start of this article is confusing as it seems to say the Honda Accord made in Swindon was sold exclusively in Japan. What I think it means is the Car made in Swindon and sold in europe as the Honda Accord was sold in Japan as an Ascot. Also, is the 'this caqr was never sold in the US' nessacery? The page for the Chevy Nova doesn't have a note at the top saying it was never sold in the UK. I'm removing it.(86.31.188.36 (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing
Talk:Jokosher

message: They has been other open source Linux multi-track editors such as Rosegarden, Sweep, Audacity ,MusE or Ardour.
Wheather you consider them usable is something but to dismiss them is quite wrong :) -- Allix
:I was referring to Cubase as it is the application that Jono uses to edit the LUGRadio show currently, and he probably will until v0.2 or close to. It is a Mac application, so demonstrates that there is nothing else particularly good for professional audio production. --T. Moitie [talk] 21:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cubase  
Talk:Ford Model N

message: I'm trying to look up information on early Ford cars and production numbers. The text of the article and the side bar quote different numbers for the production of the Model N.  This should be fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.28.97.138 (talk) 03:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Main part of the article claims a base price of $500, however the modelR subsection states that the model R was $150 more than the base model N price of $600 Crasic (talk) 09:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Automobile price
Talk:Frederick Koehler

message: I added a Bull page just so that would be a correct link.Sexyactionnick 01:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link for Bull isn't right but I don't know what it should be. - Peregrinefisher 00:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nerus (Stargate)

message: I've changed the wording, as Nerus' information was accurate, it just wasn't complete, nor were his real intentions made known.  I'm fully cognizant that the disinformation article defines such "information" as "false", but I think the definition of that word is sufficiently fluid to allow for inclusion of "failure to provide full disclosure".  Tomertalk 11:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "false information" -> "disinformation" 

message: The redirect to List_of_Stargate_SG-1_characters#Goa'uld was quite useless to me.
I had to find an old version of this page to tell me anything remotely interesting about the subject.
There are more than enough wiki-tags to flag disputable and disputed content.
There were 40 attempts in Nov 2021 (by bots and others) to access the article via the character name.
How many of the people who wanted to read about this character were served by redirecting them to a page that told them nothing about the topic of interest?
How much harm would have been done by the imperfect content (with adequate tags for the purists) to the few people who wanted a quick reminder about the character?
Maybe the page would have been preserved if the character inspired fear about climate change. -2601:156:1:9D10:0:0:0:2AA4 (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is a shame the content on this page has been effectively taken down
Talk:Psychometrer Eiji

message: Simply be the piling here the evidences of notability.<BR/>
Psychometrer Eiji (manga) 25 Vol. by Yuma Ando & Masashi Asaki, has ANN. No licensor in UK/US, Germany, Italy & Spain. Licensed in France by Manga Kana all the 25 vols were published in French by 2006 and this series is still available on bookstore. French reviews  Manga Sancturary
Derivative works :<BR/>
One video game<BR/>
One OVA<BR/>
Seems to have two TV Drama seasons (10 & 12 Eps) released :ja:サイコメトラーEIJI First season TVDramaDB Second season TVDramaDB
update --KrebMarkt 21:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidences of Notability 

message: HATE. THAT IS WHAT I AM FULL OF AND LOVE. ALSO WTF IS UPO WITH THE KANJI OR NIPONESE LANGUAGE BLOCKS IN THIS ARTICLE. 91.152.171.51 (talk) 23:10, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  LETS END THIS
Talk:Women of Wrestling

message: The following needs to be revised:
EWF was friendly to WOW and presented some of their workers on shows.
EWF was friendly to WOW?  You could say that EWF and WOW had a working relationship and would exchange talent.  Mr. C.C. 16:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revise 

message: I think unless there is a special circumstance, there isn't need to add a note for every single championship change. What I meant was there really any need for the note that Jungle Grrrl defeated Lana Star for the WOW World Championship? Of course, Jungle Grrrl as the one listed right after Lana Star would make sense as is that Jungle Grrrl defeated Lana Star. Who else was she going to defeat so that the title could change? If Lana had a substitute i.e. Kitty, than that would be a special circumstance that warrant a note. Other changes was okay to note as they were with special circumstances. Terri Gold won the title when there was none before her in a special match, battle royal. Danger won the title at a taping on one day, that was schedule to air another day. Terri Gold won it the second time at WOW only pay-per-view so far. Lana Star supposedly won title after WOW originally folded at a non-television event for another company in a WOW sanction match. What do you guys think?Seasrmar (talk) 03:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Championship Notes 

message: Santana Garrett won the title in a triple threat with Jungle Grrrl and Amber O'Neal. There was no title reign between Jungle Grrrl and Santana. Lana Star never regained the title from Jungle Grrrl.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.174.118 (talk) 21:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santana captured title from Jungle Grrrl