Talk:Ken Ham

message: The Infobox says Ham's Nationality is Australian. The lead also describes him that way. But he has been living and working in the USA for over 30 years. Surely he would have to be an American citizen by now. HiLo48 (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure he's now a naturalized U.S. citizen, though I don't have an RS at hand to prove it. --1990'sguy (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. In the absence of further information, I have boldly edited the article accordingly. HiLo48 (talk) 03:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: HiLo48, I sense a severe COI on your part here... ;-) Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: And I sense a possible absence of good faith in that comment. HiLo48 (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can understand why Australians would want to disown a wacky homophobe like Ham.  However, AIG itself claims him to now have American citizenship  and I believe that Christian News Wire is also an RS .  Note however "also has American citizenship", so dual citizenship. Black Kite (talk) 23:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Those are excellent sources. It would therefore seem that we should describe his Nationality in the Infobox as being both Australian and American. Though "American" seems a little informal. Would it make sense to say "Australia and United States of America"? And to simply call him Australian in the first sentence of the lead is now also misleading. I'd be happy with "Australian born" or "Australian American". (Although that style of labelling is not so common in Australia.) Thoughts? HiLo48 (talk) 00:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia refers to most, if not all, American public figures as "American", so using that term for Ham would be fully appropriate. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

text: Nah, just trying to be funny. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

text: He certainly was an Australian citizen, and there is no reason to suppose that is no longer the case. That would suggest "Australian born" is insufficient. We would need a reliable source to say that he's American (which I think does imply citizenship). StAnselm (talk) 03:08, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: Could we add an updated picture? The current one is over a decade old now, it could still be included but maybe a new one for the main picture? The current one is also just overall bad quality, looks really washed out Detectev (talk) 22:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea. You know Æsop's fable about belling the cat? John Foxe (talk) 02:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

text: I agree with adding an updated photo, but we would first need to get one that's available for us to use with the appropriate licensing. --1990'sguy (talk) 04:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I believe the section on his beliefs should be solely about what he believes. I think that there should also be another section called “criticism” where we can put what modern scientists think Cannolorosa (talk) 14:59, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:CRIT, criticism sections may themselves not be neutral. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: may “reactions” would would be a better header? Cannolorosa (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "Reception" is commonly used. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Argumentative