Talk:From Dusk till Dawn

message: Most film articles on Wikipedia have a section that describes how the film was received, by critics and by audiences. The only thing this article has is an implication that it did well enough to have two sequels. Any info on reception?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.151.13.191 (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: "From Dusk till Dawn" doesn't look right. Till should have a capital T, not lower case. From Dusk Till Dawn.
No. "Till" is slang for the preposition "until." Prepositions in titles are not capitalized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.215.121.82 (talk) 04:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't care less how it's written here, but you're argument is pretty silly: The poster reads "FROM DUSK TILL DAWN" and not "From Dusk Till Dawn" and the "TILL" is capitalized because is ALL CAPS! --85.176.61.27 (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

text: It definitely should be. Have you requested a move? Samurai Kung fu Cowboy (talk) 16:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It should be "Till" 

message: Note: Part of the spoilers are listed below.
As the gang head into "The Titty Twisters", there was a man constantly boasting the "pussies" (read: prostitutes) they have. Can anyone who has the full form of this script also put that into the "Trivia" section, please? --Blackhawk charlie2003 12:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Pussy" script 

message: I don't have time at the moment to clean up the page, but someone needs to clean up that plot synospsis, cause it needs paragraphing and paraphrasing to all hell. If anyone can do that...well, fantastic.
Hey, I paragraphed the synposis I wrote but I really have no clue what paraphrasing is. Raven6247 17:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 

message: i've seen evil dead at least ten times, what's this about From Dusk Til Dawn having references to evil dead? --AlexOvShaolin 05:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to [[The Evil Dead]] 

message: I have removed the disgusting plot synopsis, by basically deleting about 98% of it and adding a sentence of my own.
The plot's still bad, but at least it's a huge improvement. The old plot was literally the worst thing I've ever read on Wikipedia. It explained every scene of the film, right to the end, including quotes! Terrible. 
Anywho, I've not cited any references, but neither had the person who sat and typed out everything they could see in the film as they watched it. DanTheShrew (talk) 11:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hideous plot is no more 

message: I know my plot is crap, but why change it back to that abomination?
At least leave me a comment on this page to explain your actions. DanTheShrew (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why change it back? 

message: Do we have more information - why banned, why lifted ?  Does that one line warrant being in the opening section ? -- Beardo (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned in Ireland 

message: I dont have time and interest in checking all of this article but here is some problems with it:
#what is genre of this film at last !? Action Comedy,or Action Comedy Horror or ..... it seems there is edit war about it 
#Where is the picture of dance and if its deleted why the description about it is still there ?!
#Is it vandalism !? because I cant find Quentin Tarantino nomination for Razzie Award !!!  
--WikiBahal (talk) 22:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is ruined ! 

message: Action-comedy? I've seen this film. There's very little humour in it. Tons of horrible murders, a rape, two of the -protaganists- set an innocent human on fire... Lots42 (talk) 01:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't classify it that way, but there's black comedy in it - such as a guitar made out of a corpse. Jim Michael (talk) 14:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, seriously 

message: Is it just me or does the rear of the Titty Twister resemble The Tower of Babel? – Lionel (talk) 10:59, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just you. Lots42 (talk) 03:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

text: You, and perhaps your mom. --87.78.54.250 (talk) 12:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to offend other people, Mr. Anonymous. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 16:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titty Twister 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on From Dusk till Dawn. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/1996/1996st.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on From Dusk till Dawn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120714022223/http://kinkycyborg.com/wordpress/miramax-from-dusk-till-dawn-series-dvd-review/dvd-reviews to http://kinkycyborg.com/wordpress/miramax-from-dusk-till-dawn-series-dvd-review/dvd-reviews
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Was going to bring this to the talk page once someone directly involved (like say User:Andrzejbanas) reverted the change instead of an admin needing to exert his/her undue authority to me, but whatever, I don't care enough about the genres anyway, with all the other POV inaccuracies in the article. Question is vampire-crime or action-horror (or something else)? WP:FILMLEAD says genres should reflect the majority of mainstream sources; I went through reviews on RT & other sources available with 'vampires' & 'crime' popping up more than the others. (I also wonder about the reliability of Box Office Mojo since it's owned by IMDB, but if it's as good as the others that's fine). Few of them are going to count as 'scholarly' anyway.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barely made one (talk • contribs) 07:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Box Office Mojo (BOM) is definitely a reliable source; see WP:FILM/R.  The IMDb is unreliable because it's user-generated, but BOM is not user-generated.  What we have right now is a citation to a reliable source.  You've said that the majority of sources disagree with this, but you've provided no proof.  The reason why it's cited is because people continually tweak genres without sources, based only on their personal belief.  A citation to a database helps to keep this under control.  BOM is authoritative for box office and budget figures, which means it's frequently cited in articles.  This makes it an easy and quick choice – though there's nothing special about BOM with regard to genres.  The AFI Catalog of Feature Films, AllMovie, or another reliable database might be even better, considering BOM is focused primarily on box office performance.  Or one could show that the majority of sources do contradict this by posting links to these citations.  Pointing to Rotten Tomatoes and saying, "I looked at lots of reviews" doesn't really count because many of the reviews at Rotten Tomatoes are from self-published bloggers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to those guidelines, Rotten Tomatoes would clearly be considered a reliable source as well since it screens whether reviews are from sufficiently professional sites to be RT-approved (as you linked me to what are considered reliable sources & the ones containing reviews are also included on RT). Its consensus describing it as crime drama-vampire hybrid should be a big enough sign. I'm assuming by having to provide proof, you'd want me to list 20, 30, 50 sources? Not exactly practical & it'd be better to check them yourself. I redid a google search on it & found reviews like these which seem typical in content: https://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/19/movies/film-review-enough-blood-to-feed-the-thirstiest-vampires.html https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/from-dusk-till-dawn-1996 https://variety.com/1996/film/reviews/from-dusk-till-dawn-1200444406/ https://www.empireonline.com/movies/dusk-till-dawn/review/. Although granted, I did also find several tags to action, comedy, & horror, so those 2 might not be undue weight after all...hm. Barely made one (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'vampire crime' or 'action horror' in the lede