Talk:Insurgency in Northeast India

message: I propose to merge Insurgency in Northeast India into Separatist movements of India. I think that the northeast insurgency movements can be explained as a subsection in the article which has the separatist movements all over India. There is no need for a separate article just for the North east. Rasalghul1711 (talk) 17:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Its kinda more complex and multifaceated than that (compared to other movements in India), hence the need for a separate article. Tasumluke (talk) 02:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I've undid the undiscusssed move to Violence in North-East India -- violence may include any expression of physical force (e.g. domestic violence or a man stabbing another man in a bar over money matters). This article is not about generic violence -- it's about separatist violence. utcursch | talk 11:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: According to the news, hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced due to violence. But you wouldn't know that by this page. Just a listing of organizations. Student7 (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Upheaval not documented

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Insurgency in Northeast India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090922213600/http://www.ptinews.com:80/news/281233_Over-360-militants-surrender-with-hi-tech-arms to http://www.ptinews.com/news/281233_Over-360-militants-surrender-with-hi-tech-arms
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150402133721/http://www.bethanylacina.com/Lacina_IndiaSeparatism_2013.pdf to http://www.bethanylacina.com/Lacina_IndiaSeparatism_2013.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Insurgency in Northeast India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090913175312/http://www.sinlung.com:80/category/northeast to http://www.sinlung.com/category/northeast
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Insurgency in Northeast India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ksg/data/eacd_notes.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/web1/08july19/national.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070716051523/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/Latimer04.pdf to http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/Latimer04.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140909031515/http://www.thesangaiexpress.com/page/items/41765/ne-rebels-call-general-strike-on-i-day to http://www.thesangaiexpress.com/page/items/41765/ne-rebels-call-general-strike-on-i-day
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I don't think its possible to deny this article has an extremely pro-Indian bias, you can just naturally tell by reading it, the person who wrote this clearly has a pro-Indian stance and it radiates propaganda from it, which shouldn't be on any Wikipedia article. Irregardless of the group in question, Wikipedia always must remain neutral even when talking about horrible groups like ISIS, the word "terrorist" should only be used if the group mainly operates through terror tactics and in complete honesty most of the time even when referring to actual Terrorists like ISIS or Al-qaeda they should still be referred to by their name, putting as an example (This just an example it isn't found in the article itself) "23 terrorist where neutralized" just makes it so obvious that the article is simply biased, putting "Terrorist" even when they are terrorists makes it seem as though you are not even giving them the befit of calling them by their name and putting neutralized instead of kill is just a way to make the "23" less gruesome by using a white wash term "neutralize", instead it should be "23 ISIS fighters died". Not only that but most of the groups here don't fit the definition of Terrorist, most of these groups seem like Armed Separatists, or Militants not terrorists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Front_of_Boroland#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Liberation_Front_of_Assam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_National_Liberation_Front Vallee01 (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Bias.