Talk:Once More unto the Breach (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine)

message: In a startrek.com article from 1999, actor J.G. Hertzler says his favorite DS9 episode is "Once More Into the Breach." Elsewhere on startrek.com the episode is referred to as "Once More Unto the Breach." ShutterBugTrekker 16:24, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Read a motherfucking book? 24.118.120.25 (talk) 05:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DSN: Once More Unto the Breach

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Once More unto the Breach (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) as per overwhelming consensus. Once More Unto the Breach and all other forms with all other capitalizations should redirect to Henry V (play) with a hatnote placed on that article pointing to the episode.  Red Slash 01:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Once More Unto the Breach →  – Somebody who reads "Once more unto the breach ..." and googles it may actually wind up here. They may actually come to think that the author they were reading was referencing Star Trek. Which is ridiculous. It's still ridiculous two years after this same proposal was closed as no consensus. The title should redirect to Henry V (play). Srnec (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support. This is one of the most famous phrases in English literature, so it really is a no-brainer. Those who haven't heard of it need to earn the right to discuss this in an encyclopaedia. -- Ohconfucius ping / poke 14:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to make life easier for the closer, I'll note that I agree. --BDD (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
An article once existed at a longer version of the title, but it was PRODded.  Powers T 12:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Well, little surprise here, but now anyone looking for the episode is going to have a hell of a time finding it.  The base name redirects to a section, where there's absolutely no note about the DS9 episode.  Someone who didn't know that this was the beginning of a quotation is going to be mightily confused, especially since the section redirected to doesn't mention the name of the play, and the quotation doesn't even appear until fifth paragraph (and without bolding or anything else).  What a ridiculous result.  Powers T 17:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 2

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support. This is one of the most famous phrases in English literature, so it really is a no-brainer. Those who haven't heard of it need to earn the right to discuss this in an encyclopaedia. -- Ohconfucius ping / poke 14:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to make life easier for the closer, I'll note that I agree. --BDD (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
An article once existed at a longer version of the title, but it was PRODded.  Powers T 12:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
Well, little surprise here, but now anyone looking for the episode is going to have a hell of a time finding it.  The base name redirects to a section, where there's absolutely no note about the DS9 episode.  Someone who didn't know that this was the beginning of a quotation is going to be mightily confused, especially since the section redirected to doesn't mention the name of the play, and the quotation doesn't even appear until fifth paragraph (and without bolding or anything else).  What a ridiculous result.  Powers T 17:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion