lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Featured pictures

message: Someone should change ... to the monastery and its church were included... Cessaune [talk] 05:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake on the July 1 featured picture 

message: I reckon the FP section would be better in the top right slot on the main page where it would form a natural pairing with the Featured Article.  As this would require some restructuring of the main page I have started some discussion at Talk: Main Page. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position on the main page 

message: Should the films in the Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment section be spun off into their own section for films? The amount of movies becoming Featured Pictures is increasing. Could make it easier to navigate that way. GamerPro64 19:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, see Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 19:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film section
Talk:Journalism

message: the text is saying that journalists only create content about news.this is not true.  Arman gh82 (talk) 16:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits are unsourced and grammatically incorrect. They are not an improvement to the article. MrOllie (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journalism is not just about news 

message: Is there any way we can include the impact of spreading fake news on a global scale? For example, the mounds of fake news that marked the Covid 19 period? 
Amraamir9 (talk) 03:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:List of current senators of Canada

message: I have reverted the good-faith redirection by IP editor. Although the result was to merge, per the discussion in multiple area by and with all or most of you, we have collectively decided to pend implementation of the merge until April 2020 in order to fully discuss the columns we wish to preserve, per WP:NODEADLINES.
There are certain columns with respect to dates that we may wish to have survive the merge as they are being used by Canadian post-secondary institutions, per Canadianpoliticaljunkie and the IP editor on the destination talkpage.
, is there a merger tag we can replace on the article's talkpage that illustrates that it is being merged and to consult the talkpage? For now, I'll add a wiki-comment at the top of the page.
Cheers,
--Doug Mehus  T·C 15:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm content with you course of action. GoodDay (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , . Doug Mehus  T·C 16:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Makes sense to me. — Kawnhr (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

text: I don't think you needed my permission, and just letted get merged, as I have other things to do, outside of the Internet. Chad The Goatman (talk) 00:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[List of current senators of Canada]] pended until April 2020 per [[WP:NODEADLINES]] 

message: Simply, because it would be common sense. SmashingThreePlates (talk) 00:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There should be portraits for every member here.
File talk:Cheicon.jpg

message: Che Guevara icon.
This is a photo portrait taken by the Cuban photographer Alberto Korda and printed with strong contrast. The star on Che's hat and his eyes have also been edited from the original version. Cuba didn't sign the Berne convention thus the copyright status is unclear.
Uncropped source photo: :Image:Che.jpg.
Korda successfully claimed copyright in 2000 to prevent it being used in a Vodka ad. Korda was a lifelong communist, though, and only wanted to cut down on the commercialization of the image, telling reporters:
"As a supporter of the ideals for which Che Guevara died, I am not averse to its reproduction by those who wish to propagate his memory and the cause of social justice throughout the world."
See http://edition.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/09/16/cheguevaraphoto.ap/.
noncommercial
--69.108.1.58 07:14, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  From image page 

message: The copyright holder's statement above clearly shows that use is permitted in specific cases and context. Without commenting on if it is fair use for the Wikipedia article on Che, it most certainly is not for the article on beret and other non-Che articles it has been placed in. -- Infrogmation 17:30, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context dependant
Talk:Vilayat Inayat Khan

message: What was his citizenship? 13:13, 9 June 2013‎ User:Oliver Puertogallera
:Pretty sure it was British. Certainly not Pakistani. I have no idea why this article has been put under Pakistan. SedgwickMJR (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: He was not a guru. He taught people about many different spiritual paths and then encouraged people to follow the one that was best for them. That is quite unlike what a guru does. 
Although deeply meditative, he was also far more intellectual than most people who get a guru label. He was much more curious, and teaching curiosity and leading people to curiosity; rather than ever saying "this is how it is", like most "gurus". It might be more accurate to call Khan a mystic rather than a guru, as he preferred to live in, and explore, the mystery, much like mysticism is also about living, or at least aiming to live, in the mystery.75.80.114.227 (talk) 07:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a guru

message: I'm not sure why anyone doubts the notability of this person. He was one of the major figures of the New Age in Europe and the US, followed by thousands of people. Pretty notable in my view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SedgwickMJR (talk • contribs) 14:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Church of Satan

message: I'm working my way through :Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. This article contained a short ref to Lewis & Petersen 2014 that had no corresponding cite. However a cite for "Controversial New Religions" edited by Lewis & Petersen 2005 did exist. Controversial New Religions was actually published in 2014, so that should solve the problem. However as I was searching for a solution I read page 408 of Controversial New Religions.
Currently the text in the article that was using this ref is . 
:this text no longer appears in the article and there is no citation for Controversial New Religions --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: put this  text in the article - ....-Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

text: and deleted this text from the article -Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

text: @ActivelyDisinterested Am attempting to cleanup CoS article. Do you see any more problems before I delete the tags? --Louis P. Boog (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The particular OR issue I highlighted has been resolved, if your happy with the wrest of the article the that tag could go.I didn't add the Third Party tag, but I can see why it was added. A large part of the references are either directly from The Church of Satan or an interview with the High Priest of the church. That hasn't been resolved so I would suggest leaving the tag in place. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 13:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @ActivelyDisinterested Will work on the 3rd party issue. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What seems like OR or possibly false referencing 

message: I'm just wondering if anybody is going to add something about An American Satan (2019) and Into The. Devil's Den (2019) as they're both newer documentaries on the contemporary Church of Satan. MikoMek (talk) 21:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will anyone add new documentaries? 

message: i want to rich 105.4.2.21 (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to join 

message: iwant to be rich 105.4.2.21 (talk) 02:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to join
Talk:Spike

message: 'Spike is a character from Knuckles' Chaotix 2 (PC - soon to be released)'... whats this about??? --Hexhunter 11:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kuckles Chaotix 2? 

message: Following the manual of style for disambiguation pages I removed a number of entries because they were
*Dictionary definitions already in wiktionary
*Slang terms that directed to topical articles in which the slang term was not mentioned (it is unlikely that someone looking for computer programming would start by typing Spike, for example)
*Some people with the first name Spike.  Again, unlikely that someone looking for Michele Spike the social activist would start by typing Spike.  (However, Spike Jones, Spike Lee, and the fictional Spikes are more reasonable in this regard).
Thatcher131 (talk) 01:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: In Goldeneye, Boris "spiked" the US through computer. What in that context does "Spike" mean? --69.67.230.226 22:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer spiking 

message: What do players mean when they spike damage in MMORPGs? I've also heard it used in Super Smash Bros Melee. 209.91.61.251 16:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: basicly lots of damage in the space of a second or two not sure where to put it...--81.103.41.215 20:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spiking in video games?

message: I added the character from Buffy, basing the structure off of the one used for Angel on the disambig page for Angel. Umbralcorax 21:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  buffyverse 

message: Please help me understand the style guideline, so that I may do better in the future.
The text below was removed.  Based on another note on this talk page, it appears that I should not have linked the text "Father Tooth" to the article on Fr. Arthur Tooth.  Is that the issue that caused the undo?  I guess I thought that we were supposed to link most words in our entries to the articles discussing them.  For example, if someone looked up "spike" to see what the Wikipedia said about it, it seems useful that the entry actually points to an article about a "spike".  Is there anything else that should be changed?
Spike, An Anglican who advocates or practises Anglo-Catholic ritual and observances. (OED citation: "There were several other effigies of famous spikes, including the legendary Father Tooth.")   talk 06:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Catholic Spike 

message: Moved to Talk:Spike (character)#Is Spike (character) a valid disambiguation page? older ≠ wiser 03:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   Is [[Spike (character)]] a valid disambiguation page?
Talk:Entropy

message: There was an instance of Template:POV dated November 2022 buried in the middle of the Carnot cycle section.  Baffled, I tried to find any relevant discussion, and could not.  If there had been discussion, I would've changed the tag to  (or moved the existing tag to the top of the article if it was genuinely meant to apply to the entire thing), but without any indication of why neutrality might be disputed it appears to be a case of WP:DRIVEBY.  As such, I simply removed it.  -- Proginoskes (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion-free POV tag removed 

message: The section on Entropy#Economics (near the bottom, under Interdisciplinary Applications) strikes me as very oddly written, and focusing a ton of effusive praise solely on the works of one Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen.  I think it'd be better if this could be toned down and made into a more generalized overview, instead of a section just crediting this one guy with being the brightest mind since sliced bread. Hornpipe2 (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added by . He has also contributed over 80% of the article for Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen in the same style. It has been questioned on the talk page at Talk:Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen#NPOV in introduction. While Georgescu-Roegen is very distinguished in his field, the article prose makes overly use of WP:PUFFERY and the WP:TONE is a too dramatic rather then academic. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Economics" 

message: Max Planck derived the equation, not Boltzmann, and Max Planck introduced the Boltzmann constant, not Boltzmann. 90.154.71.24 (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ludwig Boltzmann... found the link between the microscopic interactions, which fluctuate about an average configuration, to the macroscopically observable behavior, in form of a simple logarithmic law, with a proportionality constant, the Boltzmann constant, that has become one of the defining universal constants for the modern International System of Units (SI)".
Talk:Woman on top

message: See my recent comments at Talk:Missionary position. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said there: per the template's help page, . Without evidence of that, the tag is not needed. What evidence is there that people in these places view this topic differently? Crossroads -talk- 18:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged as { { globalize } }
Talk:Doggy style

message: I'd like some significant historical evidence that these two individuals actually existed. A google search yields no results when conducted as follows: "Wendi and Dave G". I'm almost certain that they're allusory to private citizens whose lives needn't be published in a legitimate source such as Wikipedia. I'm only willing to give the author the benefit of the doubt until such time as someone can verify my suspicions (by finding that these two truly are irrelevant). Thank you. Earthliberator 08:29, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard of sexual aficionados known as "Wendi and Dave G" throughout my eight-year quest in the pornographic realm. Therefore, I am 95% positive that the two aforementioned names are probably fabricated characters or the unsuspecting victims of some rudimentary adult joke. If so, please delete that reference immediately. If not, please enlighten the rest of us on the remarkable achievements of these two doggie experts. Danke, Lowang 08:40, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the disputed tag as the problem has been mitigated. I appreciate the efforts of whichever editor corrected this concern, and am generally pleased by the new version of the article. Earthliberator 18:44, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wendi and Dave G
Talk:Visitation

message: I am not sure that visitation is not used in some European jurisdictions. Alex756
:You may be right-it's "access" in the English law, and I think in the Scottish also. What I intended was to clarify that the article was based on US law, which although fairly obvious from the Canada reference was not actually stated at  the outset. jimfbleak 14:51 May 12, 2003 (UTC)
I have followed this article from North Korean abduction of Japanese.  Someone added that such issue is equivelant to Japanese women abducting their own children back to Japan.  It appear that the person making the edit lost his kids.   Though I sympatsised with his problem, I have deleted the edit.  I realised that the same person is promoting his particular agenda over in Japanese and English Wikipedia and this was one of the page.  FWBOarticle 06:24, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Hull

message: Thanks to whoever removed the penis photos. --pointless, Oct. 29 2006
Help!! How do I remove the photos at the top of this page? --pointless existence, not signed in
Thank you Tarquin. I moved it over to do this myself, then forgot about it. Andre Engels 08:33 May 13, 2003 (UTC)
I edited this portion of the page to include a heading. 74.130.117.106 (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dick Pic Removal 

message: Can the term "hull" be applied to spacecraft? It's a term that often comes up in science fiction, such as Star Trek, and may warrant a mention on this page. 74.130.117.106 (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about spacecraft? 
Talk:Halizah

message: Questions: Does anyone do this anymore? Or is this purely historical?
*Answer: Yes it is still done, particularly within all branches of Orthodox Judaism. A woman finding herself in such a situation must apply to Beth Din (Jewish court of Torah law where they will prepare the whole ceremony. (By the way, why didn't you sign your question with the four tildes ~~~~? Thanks IZAK 20:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it still done?

message: This is my message to User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg: Hi Sheynhertz: "Hebrew words starting with "H" must remain so: Why are you moving articles with Hebrew words around? I noticed you moved Hakham to Chakham which makes no sense, see my reasons and request for it to be moved back to Hakham at  because, for example, we use this convention in the cases of Halakha, Hanukkah, Humash, Hazzan, Hivites, Horites, Hebron, Hermon, Horeb, Habakkuk, Ham, Hur, Heshbon etc. Most times, there are good reasons for the spellings as they follow an accepted convention, and it's best to leave them until you can be absolutely sure that it's safe to make changes in Hebrew-named articles. (You may also want to see some of trhe discussions taking place at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew). Thanks for your attention. IZAK 20:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops... I thought chakham is better than hakham. like chametz, ein momenterl, please..! --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 20:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs to be reverted back to Halizah

message: I noticed that this page quotes bible verse using roman numeral "..whomever she desires (Deut. xxv. 5-10)."   and   "...The old custom of the levirate marriage (Gen. xxxviii. 8) is ...".  Is there any Wikipedia standard on this?  In general I have not seen it as roman numerals.Jon513 21:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  biblical quotes 

message: Bible Bulletin Board's "MacArthur’s Questions and Answers" by: Tony Capoccia Bible Bulletin Board, followed by a P.O. Box mailing address? Are you kidding me? I'm removing this from the article as it satisfies none of the requirements regarding sourcing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.101.204.248 (talk) 02:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange, non-notable source 

message: The name of the page is Halizah, but in almost all of the descriptive text and sub-categories, the spelling is Halitzah. Should we change the page name, or adapt the spelling in the main text to Halizah? 
LGJMS (talk) 13:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and spelling 

message: It is a mitzvah that should be performed 69.115.86.179 (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must chalitza be performed or only if the widow wishes to remarry
Talk:Bing Crosby

message: For someone better at orthography than I, should there be hyphens in the phrases "post World War II" and "broadcast quality", both in paragraph 5 of the lead?  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 06:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pete Best Beatles I am going by instinct here. The WWII may be fine, (you could check other WWII era articles to see how other editors handled this) but I would prefer a hyphen for broadcast-quality. I see a problem with "prerecorded" my mind prefers "pre-recorded", but predictive text showed "prerecorded"....so what do I know!? Check this section MOS:HYPHEN which may provide better assistance. Overall, I suggest you have a read through WP:MOS for persnickety issues. Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 20:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthography 

message: @2601:447:4000:220:25FE:BEDC:E29D:96A3 If you want to make changes to the section on FBI files and mafia involvement I think it would be best to propose the changes here on the talk page first. Your edits have been unsourced, or attributed to a source that does not verify the claims at all.
Of course, anybody with intent to change the relevant information is welcome to post in this thread. GabberFlasted (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ” the over 280 pages of Crosby's FBI files, there is only one reference to organized crime or gambling dens, the content of a some of the many threats that Bing Crosby received throughout his life.” This sentence makes no sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.68.138 (talk) 08:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  FBI Files 

message: The passage, "the content of a some of the many threats that Crosby received" seems to be confused. 2A00:23CC:B59B:6B01:18C8:EF77:188B:C0FB (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused
Talk:Green movement

message: Page needs attention, there's a lot here, especially lots of links to other political and environmental articles. There needs to be some consistency with environmentalism for example. The green movement has matched the left (with which it has a degree of overlap of course) for internal philosophical wrangling and splitting, which this page could provide a guide to.
I'm happy to make a start (soon) -- FrankP 11:45, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Planning cleanup

message: Consider merging with Ecology movement and Environmental movement. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I see no reason why Greens is a separate article from this one.  I can understand Green politics being separate (the ideology versus the actual organized movement), but a separate article for the people who are a part of the movement?   Fishal 23:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge - Jack (talk) 21:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge - Merge per recommendation Retropunk 03:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge - 128.220.159.42 23:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another merge