Talk:Naruto/Archive 6

message: Do you think we could change "Current arc" on the character pages to "______ arc"? Not everyone who reads the articles are going to know what arc they are reading about. Even I don't know which arc they are referring to (not that it matters to me because I'm the kind of person who likes to read the manga and doesn't like to skip too far ahead). This isn't a site only for Naruto fans, you know. // Sasuke-kun27 17:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It is suggested that words like "current" are avoided when possible.  Coming up with a name for the arc might be difficult, however.  –Gunslinger47 23:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I also agree. We should try to be more informative to the reader. --Omghgomg 09:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then could we come up with either a general consensus on names, or an official source for them? Quatreryukami 17:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Current" arc 

message: The 27 subcategories of :Category:Wikipedians who like Naruto have been nominated for merger into their parent category because they are improperly titled and duplicate the function of their parent cat. --tjstrf talk 02:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User categories 

message: well this is what I've noticed:
Naruto is AT LEAST 13 years old in episode 1 and 1 year passes at the showing of episode 142.  So I have come to this conclusion:
-Naruto is not 15 years old in naruto II but 16-16.5 years if its a 2 1/2 year time skip since the last of the original Naruto manga (before fill arcs) is in episode 135.  So by the time naruto leaves with Jiraiya to train he is at least 14 years old. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.60.0.251 (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Naruto is 12 in episode 1 and 13 by the end of 135. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do find it funny that he failed the final exam 3 times, but is the same age as everyone else. Assuming the final exam was given twice a year like the chunin exam he could be 13-14 when he joins Team Kakashi couldn't he? ...or... could he have been started earlier since he had no parents to keep him out of trouble. Is there a reference to his exact age anywhere in the manga, anime, or from Kishimoto? shadzar|Talk|contribs 03:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Databooks say so. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me! shadzar|Talk|contribs 04:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also, Naruto: Clash of Ninja 2 has lots of info on the unlockable Ninja Info Cards, like Blood Types, Favs, and of course, age. The info card for Naruto says he is 12. I believe the game covers everything up to the end of the Attack on Konoha Arc, as it contains Orochimaru and the sealed rooftop from when he attacked the 3rd. Quatreryukami 17:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glitch in the time skip/ages of characters 

message: I'm in the process of finding out how we go about, the fact, that links to non-English websites are featured so prominently in articles which have a non-English origin. As the guideline stats now "English language links are strongly preferred in the English-language Wikipedia. It may be appropriate to have a link to a foreign-language site, such as when an official site is unavailable in English, when the link is to the subject's text in its original language or they contain visual aids such as maps, diagrams, or tables, per the guideline on foreign-language sites." My suggestion is to use the link which is to the Japanese Wiki version of this article - and others like it. If the article isn't written in the original language, a foreign language link may be used in the article. By the way, isn't  and  the official links for Naruto in North-America? If so, what is the point of the Japanese links? Havok (T/C/e/c) 20:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When the series is well ahead of its English counterpart, keeping those links as a good idea. Not to mention the newly-titled series being released in under a month, which isn't so much as hinted at in the English version. When the series gets a little closer, dumping the links might be a good idea, but when only a third or so has been translated, it's best to keep the more updated Japanese versions. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read my post on this matter and comments about it at Wikipedia talk:External links. Havok (T/C/e/c) 20:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

text: For referencing, by all means, use the Japanese links, I just don't see the point of having the link in the external links section when most people won't get anything out of it and it takes up space from links which could be used in it's place. Please read my comments in Wikipedia talk:External links. Havok (T/C/e/c) 20:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese links 

message: It's been deleted. Was it necessary for it to be deleted? RedEyesMetal 16:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any reason to mention English Naruto fansites? This seems somewhat irrelevant. The number of fansites does not necessarily correspond to popularity. Nor does the existance of a collectable card game. Except for the first and last sentences, this section seems more like a "History of Naruto in English" section. --Nitwit005 02:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growth and Popularity... 

message: Hi all. There is a short interview with Takeuchi Junko and Nakamura Chie (the voice actors for Naruto and Sakura, respectively) at http://eg.nttpub.co.jp/news/20070115_11.html. It's in Japanese of course, but there is a translation posted at http://forums.narutofan.com/showpost.php?p=6736075&postcount=25. On the original article there is a photograph of a bunch of people... probably the voice actors and animators? It doesn't really say. ~MDD4696 01:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh.... what's your point? // PoeticDecay 01:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I think he wants to put the pic from there up in this article.Sam ov the blue sand 22:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I could really add anything to the actual article from that interview, and I don't think it's really worthwhile to upload the image (no copyright information at source, wouldn't be able to make a fair use claim). I was just posting that here so that anyone who maintains this article, or anyone reading it who happens to check the discussion page, could also check it out if they're interested. Now at least we have some record of the interview if at some point in the future there might be some reason to reference it. ~MDD4696 04:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto Shippuden interview 

message: I am making a book on Naruto, and I want to make an article about it and put it in the Naruto-Wiki. Is that allowed? -- TheAuthorBravado 23:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it becomes a real book (that means getting it published and having it sold all over the country at the least), no. // PoeticDecay 23:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless your book is published through a reputable company and gets independent attention from various news sources, no. It wouldn't meet notability guidelines. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need to post something. 

message: Now, I know that the North American release of the anime is lagging far behind. Does anybody know if the producers of the North American release intend on translating all of the filler, certain arcs within the filler, or just skipping to translating Naruto: Shippūden?
On the one hand, it would make sense for the North American dubbers to continue with the filler: Marketing being what it is, I don't doubt that the idea of 80 additional episodes to translate is appealing (and thus, earn DVD sales for and earn advertisement revenue from them). On the other hand, supplementary material like the videogames are lagging roughly three years behind in releases, meaning if they keep the filler the translators will either have to release products which are outdated thanks to the release of the 7th generation consoles OR start translating games with characters which fans won't recognize and spoilers for storylines to come ("Wait, who are Sai and Yamato? Why can't I pick Asuma? Did they make a mistake and put Chouji's dad in his spot? Why the hell is Akamaru the size of a horse? Why does everyone look older?")
Any confirmed information would help the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.151.21.102 (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they tried dubbing the two years of filler hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they get cancelled.  I have not seen the numbers, but I'm guessing that the dubs aren't seeing the same level of fandom as was seen during Naruto's first run on Tokyo TV. –Gunslinger47 22:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have a source for this, but I heard Naruto is the highest rated show on CN, which is also significant because it was Dragon Ball Z for a very long time. JuJube 01:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would make sense, considering reruns are being shown again. Originally they took the reruns off to show a 1000th daily airing of Kids Next Door, but they put them right back in about a month later...Still, as popular as Dragon Ball Z's first run? I seriously doubt that. Treima 02:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Still, as popular as Dragon Ball Z's first run? I seriously doubt that."  I just wanted to echo that. –Gunslinger47 03:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Question regarding Naruto: Shippūden 

message: Hey all, I dont want to make a somewhat big change before asking arond first, but just a suggestion to change the blood type link in the character boxs from blood type to Japan_blood_type_theory_of_personality as it is the main reason why its listed. Has its pros and cons, however I dont see why their blood type would be listed other then for the personailty reasons. NeilHynes 22:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest bringing it up on the template's talk page instead of this one. // PoeticDecay 23:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already mentioned on that page, but no one replied to it.  Anyway, I agree that linking to the Japanese blood type theory would be better, or perhaps Blood type#Popular use. –Gunslinger47 23:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood Types 

message: What timeframe is naruto set in anyway? It has stuff from current time, like romance books, cash registers, and hospitals, but it doesn't have simple things like cars and scyscrapers. It confuses me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.74.210.5 (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an entirely fictionalized universe.  That said, you are seeing the Naruto universe through the looking glass of hidden ninja villages.  Thusfar, we've only seen a glimpse of any major cities.  Look to the second last page of chapter 327 for some "skyscrapers".  Vehicles might be in common use elsewhere in the world.  –Gunslinger47 23:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

text: In short, it's "Wheneverthehellyouwantittobe" AD. For argument's sake, it can at least be assumed that Naruto is set in modern times. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Either that or Naruto is realy a braindead guy who lives in our time but dreams of bieng a ninja who has awesome adventures.Sam ov the blue sand 23:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto Time Frame 

message: In the episode of Ben 10, where they go to the Christmas town, they show three children with Mr.Jingles at the end.  These three children are charectors from Naruto. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zatasha (talk • contribs) 23:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, how is this relevant to the Wikipedia article about the Naruto series?  (Hint: If the word "trivia" is contained in your response, do not pass Go, do not collect $200...) JuJube 21:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, a better response, "I don't believe this warrants mentioned within this article." –Gunslinger47 22:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But it's not as funny! ^_^ JuJube 22:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

text: It's not important--양복42 06:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? i want to see it. maybe its important to me! huh?! KKIPPES 06:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I want to see a pic of it. It might be part of the notability or the popularity arguements to the series. Just don't post the pic on the art. Quatreryukami 17:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben 10 

message: Naruto had ended on Cartoon Network and the series haden't finished, instead Naruto had been replaced with MÄR.Atomic45 05:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't Continue 

message: I think we should change the part to the show is on it's 9th season in japan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ATR2093 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then change it back in two days when the series ends? –Gunslinger47 01:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So are we going to make a new article for the Shippuden anime? Or are we just gonna continue using this article? --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya!) 17:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the need.  We were able to elegantly add Shippūden to the infobox very easily. –Gunslinger47 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I didnt notice that right there... --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya!) 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  9th Season 

message: The fillers are over with Epi 220 or 221 or something. --24.239.174.223 05:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but we're quite aware. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

text: According to Dattebayo, there are still three weeks left! *gasp* :D –Gunslinger47 10:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Nooooooo! You had better be wrong about that.  — Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fillers are over 

message: Naruto II is a seprate Manga from Naruto, though it is part of the same story line. The Info box between the two should be be split. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lego3400 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it isn't. The manga is one continuous story. Only the anime is divided into two separate blocks. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto II 

message: I think we should replace the picture in the info box with a picture of Naruto Shippuden since it is the new series.Themasterofwiki 13:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe once some episodes are released.  I don't like what Naruto looks like in any of what's been released so far.  It's too bad we can't use this one:  :) –Gunslinger47 20:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even with the new series, we should retain the more familiar one. A second image can be used to illustrate the difference. On that note, we should also include a section to note the different series. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about leaving all the Part 1 info on the Naruto pages and migrating all the Part 2 info onto a new set of Shippuden pages?  In other words, don't mix the information re. both series.  Or is this not feasible with how things are currently set up...The model for what I'm basing this on is what appears to have been done with the Dragonball series; the 3 series are all kept separate from each other but they have a large template tying it all together.  Character information though does reflect what is revealed in the series and other incarnations.  --BrokenSphere 22:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The main series is separated. The characters aren't. I don't think we have to break it apart yet, not when we can reasonably keep it on one page. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry but didn't I say the same exact thing 3 months ago? Any ways but Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z have some of the same characters too so what makes this series so special that it isn't treated like other articles?Sam ov the blue sand 23:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture 

message: Could we possibly put the names of the characters the correct way round? Any article on Japanese manga should put the names as they are in the original anime/manga, not the badly done Cartoon Network dub. So, instead of "Naruto Uzumaki" (which sounds wrong for a start) it should become "Uzumaki Naruto" the same goes for all characters in the anime/manga. It is painful to see Kakashi called Kakashi Hatake instead of Hatake Kakashi.
84.67.229.88 17:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We've already debated this months ago. We use Western order since it's the most common name that most readers (not just fans) will be able to recognize. NeoChaosX  (talk, walk) 18:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And isn't this the English Wikipedia? So there's another reason.Sam ov the blue sand 18:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: "Kakashi Hatake" causes you pain? You might have hyperalgesia.  The dub is not bad. JuJube 22:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just you're not used to saying it like this just like how I'm not used to saying it your way.Sam ov the blue sand 15:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, some people are used to saying that way (just like I'm used to saying Utada Hikaru), but to america, it is usually....unusual to have the last names first to most people....sorry, do I make sense? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syarasu (talk • contribs) 01:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: No, it would seem as if we didn't know the difference between a first name and a last name. It being "formal" is just plain crazy talk. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it ain't crazy talk for me. Zxyggrhyn 03:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: And one more thing, Japanese use their surnames first. Zxyggrhyn 03:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Duh. You won't get it changed by making strange appeals on talk pages. First name/Last name is how it works. Get used to it. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not making any appeals for getting the names changed. I just wanna share my ideas to the GenPub. After all, this is a discussion page. Ü . Zxyggrhyn 02:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However, this is meant to be a discussion about the artcicle and possible improvements/additons etc and not a general discussion board. This is clearly stated at the top of the page. So it is only natural that people would belive that you were mentioning this becausze you wanted a name change. --67.71.78.179 03:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting the names right 

message: i found a good link for naruto when i put it in i noticed it said not to include anymore links but to put it here and if its good enough, it will be shown on the main page, so im putting it here: http://www.leafninja.com/ check it out. hopefuly it will go on the main page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bvv (talk • contribs) 18:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awesome New Link 

message: There is a giltch in list of networks. In Poland Naruto is aired on Jetix, not on Cartoon Network 89.228.239.244 15:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little giltch about networks that Naruto is aired on 

message: Naruto in Poland is aired in Jetix (since 12.02.07), not Cartoon  Network. Pewny_PL's right.
pawelek —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.199.251.230 (talk) 15:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto in Poland 

message: Naruto (anime) in Poland is serialized by Jetix PL not Cartoon Network see  or  and manga is published by JPF see  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.25.135.150 (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto in Poland 

message: Does anyone know the dates the Naruto episodes between Season 1 and the end of Season 3 aired in America? I know when they aired in Japan but what about in America. Siraya429 21:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: TV.com — Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto Dates 

message: Just wondering,did Sasuke say da-- it before he passed out? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.200.59.115 (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He probably said , if anything.  Though, I assume you're referring to the dubs?  Which episode? –Gunslinger47 00:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

text: He doesn't say "damn it" as far as I could hear.  By the way, he doesn't pass out in this episode either, nor at any other point in this encounter. –Gunslinger47 06:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: the word "chakra" doesnt exist in this article, while for hunterxhunter, "nen" has its own detailed article. so which is right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.93.218.254 (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jutsu (Naruto)#Chakra? –Gunslinger47 18:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chakra 

message: "The filler arcs, though unreferenced in the manga (save for a few scant scenes), deal with the breaks between manga volumes, which covers a short period before the Sasuke Retrieval arc and several months before the time skip."
Isn't that supposed to be *after* the Sasuke Retrieval arc and before the time skip? 70.77.47.26 23:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The tea race was filler; episodes 102 through 106. –Gunslinger47 00:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see.  Thanks for the clarification.  70.77.47.26 06:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeframe of filler arc 

message: well, i think a link to a narutowiki would help...
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
-- 84.131.248.186 19:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto wiki 

message: In the article naruto episode 78 it said they cutted out the part where naruto and gamuanta have to toast sake in order for their partnership to be complete.What's Toast Sake? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.156.12.94 (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sake is Japanese alcoholic drink and because Gamuanta hasn't toasted a sake with Naruto yet he simply doesn't care about Naruto's problems.Sam ov the blue sand 15:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

text: See sake for more information.  The shared drink refers to Yakuza tradition for the bond between oyabun and kobun. –Gunslinger47 19:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto Episode 78 

message: On what episode? Anyway, doesn't this show the popularity of Naruto? On one of the comments that I read above, I'd agree with what Mr./Ms./Mrs. 130.113.19.111 said. Naruto is a big phenomenon even here in my country, the Philippines. He's got a large following here and is toppling down One Piece in ratings. but in fairness, Dragon Ball is still a household word since it has been here for more or less than a decade. Zxyggrhyn 06:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben 10 

message: What are the chances of the technical error in episode 80 being fixed?
I believe it was an error that cartoon network did not the episode itself, on the episode article Third Hokage, Forever... someone put in the trivia(the part is now gone) that cartoon network will air a naruto marthon on april 7th with  episode 80 being shown first along with new episodes.-hotspot
Isn't that true however?  The episode will air on April 7th along with 81, and 82, right?  Or is that wrong info?  --Putmalk 01:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, the info is correct. CN's gonna run a Naruto marathon in 2 weeks, where they're gonna replay that episode, along with 81 and 82. --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya!) 17:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I just retold what was typed on the episode page before I even checked it...Syarasu 01:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: Is it possible to re-nominate the article for featured article.  Or is it once it failed it cannot be re-nominated.  Please answer. --Putmalk 01:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't believe that the article is featured article quality, and I'm sure most of the editors of this article would agree. However, if you want to go ahead with it, the box at the top of the page talking about how the article was a former featured article candidate has a link on how to nominate article and what qualities editors are looking for in a featured article. You may also want to read why the article was rejected as a featured article to better understand what you need to improve the article to get it to FA status. NeoChaosX  (talk, walk) 00:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No offense to the editors, who have done a good job of writing an article that introduces people to the series, but at present you'd end up slaughtered for lack of references even on WP:GA review, let alone WP:FA. Maybe you should focus on that first? --tjstrf talk 00:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also to clarify an article can be renominated at a future time. It has happened before and will likely happen again. --70.48.174.189 01:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Lack of references is a lethal flaw in and of itself. It would be GA class if that was fixed, but FA is still a good ways off since FA articles actually have to be written masterfully rather than merely not have any glaring errors. --tjstrf talk 02:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The technical details are at Wikipedia:Footnotes and Wikipedia:Citing sources. The main thing we need, though, is grunt work. Someone actually has to go find the things. For plot points, that means re-reading the manga and listing the pages where the information we're including comes from. For things like the reception section, that means finding some place that wasn't just a fansite that talked about it. --tjstrf talk 20:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Where?  Got a cite for that?  It would help the article out.  --BrokenSphere 21:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure about '06, but it's been nominated for a ton of things in '07. I found that one while trawling for stuff on Bleach, which I'm trying to get ready for WP:GA (or at least peer review) right now. Care to race? ;) --tjstrf talk 21:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: It was nominated on  26th of May 2006. --67.71.77.213 02:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

text: If you add references. It's certainly not far off from it, but right now it would fail due to lack of references and possibly not including enough real-world context. Try reading through Wikipedia:What is a good article? if you want a detailed description of what you need for GA. --tjstrf talk 20:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-nomination 

message: in the putfile video what is the name of the song in naruto vs.sasuke? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenshin -Himura (talk • contribs) 17:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putfile 

message: I was looking on amazon.com and its showing that in november 2007 all of the volumes up to 24 will be released. Is this true, cause I can't find any info one this.
:na i don't think so especialy if there info on it anywere on the net.--Kenshin -Himura 13:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that the English manga is only up to Volume 13 as of now, I highly doubt it. Raven23 13:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there would be about 11 volumes worth of chapters in the next shonen Jump....71.106.128.213 04:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

text: http://www.amazon.com/Naruto-Vol-24-Masashi-Kishimoto/dp/1421518600/ –Gunslinger47 03:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: US Manga Release