lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Groupe socialiste des travailleurs du Québec

message: While editors may be anxious to move this article to an English language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 05:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:New Democratic Party of Quebec

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support. Party calls itself the "New Democratic Party" and "NDPQ" on the English version of its website. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 23:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support. Party calls itself the "New Democratic Party" and "NDPQ" on the English version of its website. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 23:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: The article previously spoke of the Quebec NPD as though it were a former party, let's face facts - it isn't. They've registered with electoral authorities and their leader has stated an intention to contest the next election, ergo it's time to start treating them as such. Also, as a party affiliated with a federal counterpart that has 16 incumbents in the province, they're at least worth watching. Chris-Gilmore77 (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer a former party
Talk:Parti Unité Nationale

message: Hi there,
I have notice that the french version of Parti unité nationale was
removed from Wikipedia. Why ???????
The english version which contains false informations remains there. Why
???????
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parti_Unit%C3%A9_Nationale
I have enclose the french version file (Parti unité nationale -
Wikipedia.htm) which was removed without any reason.[Ticket#2015102210024691] Parti unité nationale 
If you put back the french version we would update the english version.
If Wikipedia do not intend to put back the french version which contains
real information for whatever reason, please remove the english version
which is false.
Thank you in advance for your answer !
Gilles Noel
Registraire
Parti unité nationale
Here is the answer receive fro wikipedia Re: [Ticket#2015102210024691] Parti unité nationale Dear Parti UN,
Thank you for your e-mail. This appears to be a content matter and therefore beyond the scope of the volunteer response team. We do not have an editor-in-chief or an editorial board, so if you have suggestions for improving or correcting an article, please leave a message on the talk/discussion page of the relevant article.
If you need further help, please visit the Tea House and follow the instructions to leave a request for help there (click the "ask a question" link in the box at the top of the page):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:THQ
Thank you.
Yours sincerely, Robert Laculus
Partiun (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The French page for political parties https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parti_politique_du_Qu%C3%A9bec says that party ended in 2018.  The link does not work.
--Guillcote (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the parti still exist? 

message: As the headline says... Autokefal Dialytiker (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could some Quebecois please add the story of the party's "decline and fall" ?
Talk:Parti indépendantiste (1985)

message: I disagree with the move of this article to an English translation of the party name. Please see Talk:Rally_for_National_Independence. Ground Zero | t 18:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: While editors may be anxous to move this article to an Enlgish language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 01:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Marxist–Leninist Party of Quebec

message: While editors may be anxous to move this article to an Enlgish language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 01:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Parti républicain du Québec

message: While editors may be anxious to move this article to an English language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 05:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Parti social démocratique du Québec

message: While editors may be anxious to move this article to an English language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 05:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: In my edit summary yesterday, I wrote: "revert incorrect page move by User:Againme". I was mistaken. User:Againme did not move the page. Ground Zero | t 16:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake in edit summary
Talk:Ralliement national

message: "Ralliement" does not mean "realignment". I have moved the back back to the name used in both French and English. Please see Talk:Rally_for_National_Independence. Ground Zero | t 18:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Names of organizations in other languages are not italicized - see MOS:Ety, WP:ITALICS. Ground Zero | t 12:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Italicization
Talk:Rassemblement pour l'alternative progressiste

message: While editors may be anxious to move this article to an English language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 05:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Regroupement des militants syndicaux

message: While editors may be anxious to move this article to an English language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 05:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Gay Alliance Toward Equality

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of this party you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:Carlos Cavazo

message: I've heard that Greg Leon played guitar in Quiet Riot between the time Randy Rhoads and Carlos Cavazo did. If so, that needs to be stated in the article. Gringo300 (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Greg Leon

message: Any particular reason Dave Glover saying something wrong is noteworthy?  Anybody who bothers to listen to Glover and his merry band of juveniles knows that Glover getting something wrong is hardly noteworthy, or for that matter unexpected.  Some "I get it Dave" bot must have put that in there.  Since a lot of hard rock fans know who Carlos Cavazo is, and Glover's listening audience is probably his family +4, I'm deleting it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.157.205 (talk) 07:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samoan reference 
Talk:Bloc British Columbia Party

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  I'm not saying this has happened here; this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some of the big-party articles....Skookum1 01:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines
Talk:British Columbia Democratic Coalition

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  I'm not saying this has happened here; this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some of the big-party articles....Skookum1 01:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:Prime ring

message: proof of every boolean ring is a prime ring
:Not every Boolean ring is prime, in fact most are not: Boolean rings are commutative, and the only one that's a domain is the field F2 with two elements. AxelBoldt 15:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I added the requirement that prime rings be non-zero. In the literature, I often see the characterization "a ring is prime if and only if the zero ideal is a prime ideal"; and this characterization implies that prime rings are non-zero, since prime ideals are proper. AxelBoldt 15:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prime rings non-zero?
Talk:British Columbia Libertarian Party

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of the Libertarian Party of BC you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:British Columbia Party

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of this party you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:British Columbia Patriot Party

message: I have removed the "prod" tag. If you want to nominate it for deletion through the AfD process, go ahead. That way other editors can have a say before it is deleted. This was a registered political party in British Columbia. This was a registered political party in British Columbia. The information is correct, properly formatted and sourced, etc. I do not see how Wikipedia would be improved by removing this information. Ground Zero | t 18:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod for deletion

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of this party you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:British Columbia Unity Party

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of this party you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:Communist Party of British Columbia

message: To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations.  this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with some articles...If you are a member of this party you should not be editing this article!!.Skookum1 01:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re [[WP:COI]] (conflict of interest guidelines)
Talk:Jimmie Vaughan

message: For example, no mention is made of his "Tilt-A-Whirl" band, and lot of stuff in the "Personal life" section belongs elsewhere instead. Acwilson9 (talk) 22:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reorganization needed.