Talk:OPEN LOOK

message: An edit today added the tidbit that "OPEN LOOK is now hosted at Sourceforge" -- OPEN LOOK is a specification, not software, so saying it has a new home at Sourceforge wouldn't seem to be right (unless there's an open source project to change the specification itself.)
The Sourceforge page describes the project as the "OpenLook desktop", containing xview, olvwm, and companion programs.  That's a description of OpenWindows, not OPEN LOOK.
We can't fix the name of the project here (although maybe if someone associated with the project is reading this, they could take note and change it?), but we can put the pointer to it in the right place.  I would suggest moving this info to the OpenWindows page.--NapoliRoma 13:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New OL home" 

message: :Image:OpenWindows-filemgr.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:OpenWindows-filemgr.png

message: This is an article about Open Look, not the Amiga. If the Amiga is here why not any number of other GUIs, most computers from the mid 1980s onwards had them in some form. GEM is a standalone example. Other machines with which a GUI was packaged as standard include the Atari ST and Acorn's Archimedes. Wouldn't this article be more focused if None rather than all of them were mentioned? Recommend removing mention of the Amiga as superfluous. The inclusion of the Apple Macintosh and Microsoft windows can at least be understood from their historical perspective. The Star and Alto from Xerox which originate the WIMP metaphor in a desktop computer and the Apple Lisa which was the first popular public release of the GUI are all more important landmarks in GUI history than the Commodore Amiga is. Vapourmile (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the Amiga mentioned here? 

message: This diagram is incorrect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Xlib_and_XCB_in_the_X_Window_System_graphics_stack.svg
It shows that XView is built on top of the X Toolkit, and that is wrong. It talks to XLib directly, and has nothing to do with the X Toolkit. 
There was another OPEN LOOK toolkit that had nothing to do with XView, which WAS built on top of the X Toolkit, and that was MOOLIT, for the Motif OPEN LOOK Intrinsics Toolkit. It was a terrible idea, and nobody in their right mind wanted to have anything to do with it, because it combined the worst of both worlds, not to mention its name was ridiculous. But it definitely didn't have anything to do with XView, which was independently terrible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoOLIT
Xardox (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  XView is NOT built in top of the X Toolkit