lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Weissenborn

message: This article should ideally contain some images of original Weissenborns.Riph 14:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There used to be some, see , but they were removed. Andrewa (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Hermann Weißenborn (* 1865, probably in Holzland, Thuringia, Germany; † Januar 1937 in Los Angeles)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.157.55.140 (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luthier data 

message: From the introductory paragraph:
::"Weissenborn or H. Weissenborn is a brand of lap slide guitar..."
::"The signature feature of Weissenborn guitars is the hollow neck, effectively a highly adapted body chamber that runs the entire length of the body, making conventional playing completely impossible.
[emphasis added]
"Conventional playing" for a lap slide guitar involves laying the instrument on one's lap, applying a steel to the strings over the neck, and plucking the strings with the other hand.  The Weissenborn hollow neck in no way makes this "impossible"; in fact, it facilitates it.  The article also includes an illustration of a person playing a Weissenborn guitar in precisely this conventional manner.
This confusion needs to be cleared up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  An instrument that can't be played? 
Talk:Alternate reality

message: I deleted the external link to the Alternate reality British DJ due to the following rule in the Wikipedia guidelines for disambiguation pages:
"Never include external links, either as entries or in descriptions. Disambiguation pages disambiguate Wikipedia articles, not the World-Wide Web. To note URLs that might be helpful in the future, include them on the talk page."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.22.246 (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term is now being used politicaly, for politicians who seem to deny basic facts and creste their own version of the truth. I agree that it wil be dificult to write a neutral article but its needs to be done.Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump´s alternate reality
Talk:George Wilson (footballer, born 1883)

message: Where is the evidence for his birth and death date? All the sources seem to say 1884, although it wouldn't be the first time this kind of thing had been quoted wrongly somewhere and then became 'true' for other sources. I have checked the census records, there was no 'George Williamson Wilson' registered as such in Scotland between 1880 and 1885. There were 5 George Wilsons born in Fife between 1882 and 1884, you have to pay to see the certificate and I'm not at that stage yet. On checking the edit logs here, it seems an IP with no other activity - therefore quite possibly a family member with special interest and knowledge - made the alteration 5 years ago, amending the dates but with no source, nevertheless the title was obligingly changed to 'born 1882'. Any clues on this user:Jmorrison230582 (for it was thee)? Can't see anything but maybe there was a talk page chat elsewhere or something at the time? Cheers. Crowsus (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref for 1882?
Talk:Secondary Characters of Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends

message: Do anyone think Red should also be here? Dylan Damien 15:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Add more characters

message: The character is minor if you consider her presence in the series, major only within one made-for-TV movie. I don't believe that she is notable enough to qualify for a separate page, nor do I find that there is enough information on that page to justify its independent existence. Any other opinions? Lucky number 49 15:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She only appeared in Good Wilt Hunting, and her character is not developed enough to really give a full article. Other than the fact that she's Eduardo's creator (which is already noted on Eduardo's description), it's just filler text, and some speculation (age?). Yngvarr 12:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nina Valerosa
Talk:Reactor

message: Several of the links say that a reactor is a "device for containing and controlling a ... reaction." Given that containment usually is the primary function, and control (when it exists at all) is secondary, would it not be better to say that a reactor is a _vessel_ for containing and...?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.96.172 (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Device?
Talk:Billy Goat (band)

message: ON "Tales from the Edge Vol 2", the BIllygoat song Bukie Patrol lists the band members as Dillon, Smith, Pruitt, Harvin and "Philly Goat" on guitar. Anyone know who this was? My guess is Kenny Withrow, since this disc came out in 1991, but then, I guess Kenny was pretty busy right about then with the sorta sudden smash success of the NewBohs.... just a thought, anyways. Eaglizard (talk) 16:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philly Goat? 
Talk:1950s in LGBT rights

message: The year 1950 is notable for LGBT rights. As noted in the "Events" section, the year 1950 is the origin of the largest gay-rights society:
:* In the Mattachine Society (founded in 1950), which was the first major gay organization in the United States, the Society’s New York chapter is founded in 1955, and will become the largest gay rights group in the U.S.
   "Also available in Gay Rights Movement" (books), for
   Series One: The Mattachine Society of New York Records,
   1951-1976, Gale Group, webpage:
   GaleG-GRM5-PDF.
That is notable enough.  -Wikid77 15:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Nothing is listed for 1956, so why not this?
http://www.baas.ac.uk/usso/the-forgotten-lgbt-pioneers-of-1956/
24.113.51.121 (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughters of Bilitis
Talk:Ramsar, Iran

message: I have flagged the claim as dubious.  Comments? Andrewa (talk) 03:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Flagged2

message: I believe a mention of Ramsar having a high level of natural radiation is warranted. Ref: http://www.probeinternational.org/Ramsar.pdf
Kevink707 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background Radiation 

message: They are talking to gilaki language 5.121.108.181 (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are talking to gilaki language 

message: In the photo showing the dosimeters, is it certain that the dosimeter shows 143 microsieverts per hour? This is a HUGE number, amounting to 1250 mSv (1250000 microsieverts) per year if continuously exposed, since 0.143 mSv * 365 * 24 = 1250 mSv
Are the readings not 14.3 microsieverts per hour, which would lead to annual exposure of about 125 mSv/a?
Still this is a very very large amount. Fsikkema (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  143 or 14.3 microsieverts per hour?
Talk:Hawes Radio Relay Site

message: What was the exact purpose of this tower?
:This tower was one of two ground based transmitters for the Survivable Low Frequency Communications System; the other was in Silver Creek, Nebraska. TDRSS (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tower Purpose
Talk:Nanjing Yuejin Soyat

message: 1. Sizes of engines become 1.3 L / 1.5 L (Soyat & Soyat Unique)?
See Soyat web page.
2. Has it now become 'Wuxi Soyat Branch of Nanjing Automobile Group Corp. Ltd' ?
Should it merge with Nanjing Automobile (Group) Corporation ?
3. If so, models will include: Soyat-Junda (新雅途·君达) pickup and Soyat-Junda SUV. North wiki 01:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matters for Discussions:
Talk:Jinbei (car brand)

message: Dear user, thanks for your comment. I want to keep that information for one other draft about the company. This is about the brand, however they might be useful. And yes, I will re-write it today (I must first discuss with an editor that raised an issue if I must keep it like an draft or in my sandbox). You are welcome if you want to help me with that. Best regards,  Eni vak  (speak) 11:45, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About comment 

message: It is no doubt Renault Brilliance Jinbei made cars, but according to this news https://dy.163.com/article/FLCQPGBP0512B07B.html, it seems the brand is still (partially?) owned by Shenyang Jinbei Automotive the listed company, which authorised Brilliance Shineray to use the brand. Not sure the listed company owned the rights to use the brand on any car, or in 1992 split, only on a limited types of automobile. Matthew hk (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner of brand and owner of the factory that make the branded car, are two thing. 

message: I want spare parts for the car 78.180.48.99 (talk) 08:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a car from your company. I see spare parts for my car
Talk:Afghan Airways

message: After a long analysis, this version 20 April 2007 was the better than the last version. Please talk before changing. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 03:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert
Talk:Chery Tiggo

message: The Dawoo Factory in Egypt owned by Abuel Foutouh Group started in 2006 manufacturing of Speranza brand name of Chery. They started by A620 "Easter" ,then A516 "A5" and finally  A113 "A1".
In July 2008 they introduced the Tiggo. The car is fully assembled in the company factory in Egypt.
Qota (talk) 12:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiggo now in Egypt 
Talk:The Other Side Maxi

message: I found :Image:Aerosmith - The Other Side.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Aerosmith - The Other Side.jpg]]
Talk:Shelbourne Hotel

message: Unsourced stub at the moment.  Will add to this over the next few days. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 15:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem he remodelled the existing buildings into what's there now, yes. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: , please edit in accordance with policy. Those in question are verifiabilty, reliable sources, no original research, and synthesis. And - when there's a dispute - "bold, revert, discuss". Not edit war.  Please take this as a warning that you are currently on three reverts, and will potentially be in breach of the three-revert rule if you continue to revert, risking a block.
We have referenced material - newspapers and two books - that state that two of the statues are of slaves.  That may or may not be true, but WP operates on a principle of verifiability, not "truth". Pointing to a magazine's photo of an entirely different statue to "prove" that the Shelbourne's statue was not of a slave is synthesis and original research.  The Sotheby's web page is not for these statues - synthesis.  The original catalogue does not describe the statues as of royalty - original research and synthesis.  If you can find a reliable source that says that the Shelbourne statues - specifically, those ones, not other statues of other Egyptians or Nubians - are of royalty, that can then be included. In addition to, not instead of, what is currently there.  Note, one of the references you are introducing is a broken redlink. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, . I'm busy for the next few hours but will check in later.  , as you say, Bowen's 1951 book states that two of the statues are slaves. You can't then just say "she was wrong" because this source has a statue of another Nubian and this auction page from a couple of years ago doesn't mention they were slaves. That's synthesis and original research. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

text: (I managed to reclaim a few minutes, but am shortly "off out".) , you may well be entirely correct; I don't know, and I don't doubt your bona fides, so I'd say you probably are.  However, while it's true newspapers are often woefully ill-informed, most of them, including the Indo and Irish Times, are classed as reliable sources.  I saw the reference to 'Roots', but it wasn't clear what statement it was supporting. I don't have time now to look at that article again (I will tomorrow), but using that - "Nubian slaves were generally represented nude" - to back a statement that the Shelbourne statues weren't of slaves would be OR and SYNTH, according to WP's policies. What we can do is report on what the sources say.  Perhaps something along the lines of "Bowden says X about the statues; however the original catalogue for their sale says Y and makes no mention of X." Regards, BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 19:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statues
Talk:Adrian Snell

message: I have deleted the following dateless paragraph, which appeared at head of the Biography section, as it appears to have been made redundant by events later on in the section:
After seven years Adrian Snell, composer / singer-songwriter and music therapist, is releasing an inspiring and thought provoking new album: Fierce Love.
Cloptonson (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Template talk:1997/98 Adelaide dual premiership players

message: I found :Image:Adelaide90s.png and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Adelaide90s.png]]
Talk:Irob people

message: While the four pictures are interesting, three of them do not depict any people, which this article is about.  I think the other three are better suited for an article about the geographic area. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: This page is being vandalised by biased nationalists. This is evident by the clear lack of sources used by the anonymous editor. The page is called “irob people” the the first sentence refers to Irob as a land. Yegohastionlij (talk) 06:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Addicted to Music (video)

message: I found :Image:Addicted to Music DVD.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Addicted to Music DVD.jpg]]
Talk:Beulah (radio and TV series)

message: As proven by kinescopes from the 1950's/1960's, black people DID occasionally appear on TV. However, it wasn't on sitcoms, but on music/variety shows, which of course were usually thrown away after they were broadcast and thus never repeated for today's so-called "historians" to see. Retro Agnostic (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: However...
Talk:Adam Schiff (Law & Order)

message: Why was Adam Schiff's character written off Law and Order?  There is no mention of it in he main article.--Reverend Edward Brain, D.D. (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departure from law and Order 

message: (... on experience with editors settling on vague wordings without assessing whether more clarifying detail might matter” 
— in this case, because any fool can become a nominal and insignificant opposing candidate, unworthy — in such a brief summary of the episode — even of mention and perhaps merely enhancing the viewer’s sense of  denouement, and of transition to commercials and the following show).<Br>
   ’Tis thus that I summarized, briefly for the Hx and more thoroly on this talk page ... assessing that a sufficiently careful editor would have taken the trouble to clarify, about whether the char took the challenge seriously or not; thereby and thus, I leave to other colleagues to use WP:RS to judge whether that “challenge” is, on one hand,
* excessive attention to “merely corroborative detail, to add substance to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative”, or
* on the other, it has been cluttered with inconsequential detail, and deserves clarification via research ...which I leave to another, even more motivated volunteer editor.--2601:199:C201:FD70:194C:E00D:4EE9:163A (talk) 07:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   “Re-contextualized electoral challenge, based on common sense, and ...
Talk:Nair/Archive 4

message: The origins section is sorely in need of references. My access to Kerala sources are rather limited. Anyone in India or in Kerala have access to better sources? If you are able to get some, please add as many as you can to the article. Also, there is the issue with Kshatriya Dharma. While in principle I agree that Nairs performed the duties of Kshatriyas, we cannot add it to the article without proper citation. --vi5in[talk] 15:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution
Talk:Special school (Netherlands)

message: Using the term "special" for Dutch "bijzonder" schools is a problem, as there are also "speciaal" schools for children with special needs, for instance learning difficulties or disabilities. "Bijzonder" refers to privately owned schools, a better translation could be "particular". --82.181.90.152 16:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have revised and elongated the article, adding sub headers and a bunch of sources, and trying to settle on a terminology and stick to it throughout the article. Unfortunately, all the sources I used are in Dutch because I could find very little information in English. As others have suggested, I propose changing the name of the article to "particular education" to avoid confusion with the separate concept of a Dutch "speciale school". I also think this article might benefit from being incorporated into a larger article about the Dutch public-particular distinction, which could include a longer and more detailed section on the history and current controversy of religious education funding.--RaineBender (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision and proposed title change
Talk:Ace and the Ragers

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Elijah Alexander

message: Alexander was certainly still battling multiple myeloma when he died, but I've found a couple of blog posts (including one with information from his wife) that indicate that his death was sudden and actually related to an aneurysm. Can anyone find a reliable source that mentions an aneurysm? Most sources just say that he died after a struggle with myeloma. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 15:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of death
Talk:Ashi guruma

message: Done. I confirmed it by Kodokan's waza list. --Nightshadow28 16:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 

message: I added a vector illustration of the technique. If anyone has a superior image they would like to replace it with please do so. Until then I think this will sufficiently illustrate the technique. Thoughts? — Jdcollins13 (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image addition