Talk:Voivod (band)

message: There is a good interview/article at Indie InTune.  In it Michel Langevin discusses the origins of the Voivod name and some of his artistic concepts.  Could be integrated into the main article. Agentrickard 20:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Away talks about the meaning of Voivod 

message: Details about band member's deaths should be cited or quickly removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MADDOX456 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: Quick question: in creating :Category:Voivod albums, I've noted that Voivod is described as album #12, but the very next one in the list, Katorz, is described as album #14 (which, with that title, it would more or less have to be). There are also only 13 albums listed in the discography; Katorz is the 13th. So I'm compelled to ask: are we missing an album somewhere in the discography list? Bearcat 08:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: :Image:Voivod Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voivod Logo.png

message: :Image:Voivod - War & Pain.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voivod - War & Pain.jpg

message: :Image:Voivod - Voivod.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voivod - Voivod.jpg

message: :Image:Voivod - Phobos.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voivod - Phobos.jpg

message: :Image:Voivod - Nothingface.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voivod - Nothingface.jpg

message: :Image:Voivod - Negatron.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Voivod - Negatron.jpg

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 15:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use criteria

message: I rearranged the genres in the infobox.
http://www.rockdetector.com/artist,9920.sm
Thrash Metal
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:difuxqr5ldde~T1
Speed Metal
Thrash
Heavy Metal
Progressive Metal
http://www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=115
Thrash Metal / Progressive Metal
http://www.bnrmetal.com/groups/voiv.htm
Progressive Metal 
http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=5&a=l&l=V
Voivod (CDN)
1984 War And Pain Review > 7/10 - Hawk - (Thrash Metal)
1986/1988 Rrröööaaarrr Review > 2,5/10 - Hawk - (Thrash Metal)
1987/1988 Killing Technology Review > 9/10 - Hawk - (Thrash Metal)
1991 Angel Rat Review > 9/10 - Ralf - (Indie Metal)
2003 s/t Review > 9,5/10 - Joe - (Hard Rock)
2006 Katorz Review > 3/10 - Keith - (Thrash Metal/Punk)
2006 Katorz Review > 8,5/10 - Armen - (Thrash Metal/Punk)
I couldn't find any review site mentioning avant-garde metal, so I've removed it. Thrash metal and progressive metal are the most common ones, and can stay. Emmaneul (Talk) 23:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and it has been for a long time. The majority consensus throughout Wiki is to use sentence structure lists over broken lists simply because it shortens the box length (always a bone of contention) but there is a very vocal minority of about 5 editors who find there way around it and keep the crufty coded lists. One common sense resolution was proposed by a very brilliant editor which stated that the line breaks were OK if there were only 2 genres in place but when there were 3 or more then the sentence structure should be used as the cleaner format. It was a brilliant idea applauded by many. But the vocal minority who wanted the "my way or the highway" option ignored it. So they get their panties in a bunch when they see the plan being used because they think it wasn't agreed upon. In a way it wasn't. No one ever finalised the conversation. They just went ahead with the plan because they were tired of dead-end conversations with the same 4 or 5 whiny babies who kept the whole stupid debate going in the first place. But the idea works for many and so the many win in the end regardless of the vocal minority. Libs (talk) 00:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Looking through the different anons who have edited this page and established a consensus for format... not one of them were "delimiter only editors". They were all very constructive editors. As for the "therefore be disregarded" comment... Wikipedia is the encyclopedia "anyone can edit". "Anyone" can be an IP anon. And the edits of an anon are no less important than the edits of a logged account. Perhaps we can discuss this more when you return. Libs (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: its pronounced voy-vod right?
Yes, try listening to their self-titled song he says "voy-vod!!!" at the very start. --CircafuciX (talk) 04:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronuciation 

message: This section is really, really hard to read, and it has way too much redundancy.  It should either be converted into a bar graph table or a more regular line-up listing only the names (once, not repeatedly) and the years the member was active. Κεραυνοσκώπηα (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line-Up Section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Voivod (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080102131506/http://www.theendrecords.com:80/label/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=38 to http://www.theendrecords.com/label//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=38
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Voivod (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.musicmight.com/artist/canada/quebec/jonquiere/voivod
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161220133658/http://www.artisttrove.com/artist/422671721224027/Sacrifice to http://www.artisttrove.com/artist/422671721224027/Sacrifice
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130707142728/http://www.joyfulnoiserecordings.com/journal/heavy-metal/ to http://www.joyfulnoiserecordings.com/journal/heavy-metal/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Just noticed that it states Snake left in 1991, but I think this was in 1993-1994? And Eric Forrest only really performed on 2 studio albums, a remix/compliation album and a live album. Should be made a bit more specific - would edit myself but for whatever reason this article is semi-protected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.167.165 (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect History