Talk:List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes

message: References for these are needed for pretty much every class. If you know of one for even one class, please add it. Tompw (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawal dates 

message: The use of references seems to be over-the-top and is beginning (at least through my eyes) to be intrusive and making the page complex to read. Can we not place the references in a "Notes" column?? Canterberry 10:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References - Overuse??

message: The image :Image:IC250 Cl93 2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      File:GE Freightliner PowerHaul.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:IC250 Cl93 2.jpg

message: The images in this article no longer match the appropriate loco classes. At some recent point, the images appear to have been mixed up. Is it possible to remove the offending changes and revert to an earlier version? If not, then the images need to be moved to match the appropriate classes and titles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.40.7 (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Which ones do you believe to be incorrect? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images have been mixed up 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160117080030/http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The archive links failed, because they were not far enough back in time. Now fixed – Iain Bell (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070217154606/http://www.therailwaycentre.com:80/index.html to http://www.therailwaycentre.com/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of British Rail modern traction locomotive classes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061218234321/http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~pandy/cl26.html to http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~pandy/cl26.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There Is No Class 82 DVT In The Article. AlfreDziku 2 (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because they aren't locomotives. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they are. They look like class 91/Intercity 225 Range AlfreDziku (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because you "think" they are doesn't mean that they really are. The term "locomotive" is from Latin words meaning "self-moving". These cannot move by themselves; therefore, they are not locomotives. What they look like is immaterial, the similar styling of these and  is probably because they were designed by the same team, with a deliberate effort to produce harmony. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Locomotive 

message: On This List It Say eg. ‘127’ And ‘126’ Scrapped But, On The Wikipedia Page Like British Rail Class 45 It Says 127 Built, 11 Preserved/116 Scrapped AlfreDziku (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: First, provide reliable sources per the policy on verifiability. Second, don't capitalise every word. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wrong Amounts Of Scrapping, 

message: Some of the locomotives do have TOPS numbers but, they are not listed. AlfreDziku (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: Class D2/7 Has A High Resolution Picture Even Though All Are Scrapped The One In The Photo Isn’t Scrapped AlfreDziku (talk) 12:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures