lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Generation of primes

message: Prime sieve is short and the content would fit well in the also short Generating primes. PrimeHunter 18:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There were no comments after 6 weeks so I performed the merge today. PrimeHunter 17:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: I am not sure of the proper verbage, but the article essentially is referring to generating consecutive primes, as opposing to generating a prime arbitrarily (just "some" prime), where the latter does not particularly lend itself to sieve techniques, or at the least there are many other techniques to generate an arbitrary prime more efficiently.  I'm not xplaining well but the article would not apply to generation of such arbitrary primes.  This might be worth clarifying.--Billymac00 (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: Atkin and Bernstein 2004, p 1024, says "[the sieve of Eratosthenes] uses B bits of memory to compute the primes in an arithmetic progression of B numbers". That would make it O(N) space it seems, to compute primes from 2 to N. The article says O(N^1/2) space in the complexity section. This doesn't seem right. If it were to refer to the segmented sive, the storage for primes would become the main thing; it's O(\pi(\sqrt{N})) = O(2\sqrt n/\log n) is it not?
Anyone? WillNess (talk) 09:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I find some of the wording of this section rather confusing... and it calls O(N log log N) sublinear so either the sublinear or the O(N log log N) is a mistake.  Also maybe some of the material on the alternative sieves should be taken off the sieve of Eratosthenes page and put here then linked from there. (71.233.167.118 (talk) 02:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complexity
Talk:Vampires vs. Zombies

message: I haven't seen "Vampires Vs. Zombies" yet, and I came to this article to learn a bit about it.  The entire plot "summary" just reads like a fawning review, to include the author writing "Thats so cool" (sic) in response to a plot-twist.  I don't feel qualified to rewrite it, as I haven't seen it, but perhaps someone who has should take the time to do so. Itainohime 19:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mistake 'fawning' for 'ironic'. Vampires vs Zombies is a heavy contender for the worst movie of all time. Makes 'Plan 9 from Outer Space' look like Citizen Kane IMHO...Anyway I wish you joy on your first viewing of this masterpiece of world cinema [IRONY].Colin4C 20:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited out the most egrerious example of Valspeak. Happy now? Huh? Colin4C 20:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Henri Szeps

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 10:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A little puzzling as to why there has been so little attention paid to an article on a prominent actor with such an interesting history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.28.209 (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: An interesting childhood as noted here, http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/r/pro-ind/hszeps.php. Not sure about reliability, but sounds true!--220 of Borg 02:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Ken Swift

message: Planet B-Boy
Storm: Ken Swift is the last true B-Boy of his Generation...
In my opinion this is equal to "most influencial"
-- Dschafar (talk) 11:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed
Talk:Jim Jorgensen

message: So is this what you would expect to find on a discussion message comment page? 
   Does layout or format matter?
When would you or anyone else ever visit this page?  It looks like the only time would be when you are motivated enough to make a comment and only then would you discover that others might have left a comment.   Anon---  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.11.167 (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did you know the '+' sign meant it was a Talk page?  I certainly was surprised when I clicked on it.  What is a talk page anyway?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.11.167 (talk) 01:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you know the + sign meant it was a Talk page?  
Talk:Scott Aukerman

message: considering the movie was filmed in 2003, it seems rather unlikely that he was hired in 2006 to write sketches for it since time travel has not effectively been proven to be anything beyond a theory.
so is it the date that is wrong or is this just someone getting caught in a lie?
76.66.103.202 (talk) 11:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  onion movie
Talk:Deathwish Inc.

message: No reliable sources are provided to verify this article. ----moreno oso (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues tags

message: Though both the arch logo and the circle D, on their own, were both logos that we used, we have never used both logos as it appears here.  As far as we can tell, this is something that someone at Punknews.org made up, as they seem to be the source of the image.  We would appreciate it if our logo could be updated to the correct, current logo which is located here - http://www.deathwishinc.com/files/logo.deathwish.hi.pdf 
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.90.98.210 (talk) 21:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Typically when a business has both an image-based logo and a font-based logo, we like to capture both when possible (for other record label examples, see: Dangerbird Records, Epitaph Records and Candlelight Records). So, that was likely why the user combined the two logos that way. While this isn't technically false, I can see how that would be confusing; since they're both curved it would suggest that they're meant to be combined that way even though they're not. Wikipedia also likes to preserve older logos, so instead of just deleting it, I just moved it into the article body and left a note to the reader saying that the two logos aren't typically combined in this manner. Fezmar9 (talk) 19:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

text: Fair enough. Would you object to having multiple logos uploaded as separate files? Fezmar9 (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deathwish Logo
Talk:List of Interscope Records artists

message: I've semi-protected this page to protect it from a persistent vandal intent on adding information about a fictional soundtrack to The Simpsons Movie. If this is interfering with any legitimate edits, please let me know. —tregoweth (talk) 00:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protection

message: WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THIS GROUP?? THEY MADE THE HIT LOT 2 LEARN ABOUT LOVE, I WANT YOU BACK,  TAKE ME AWAY, SHOW ME THE WAY.... EXCELLENT VOCALS AND ROCK SOUND--THAT IS WHAT WE NEED!@!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.169.189.226 (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE STORM
Talk:Supporters of FC Barcelona

message: I propose moving this page back to 'Cules'. I have already linked Cules on the nickanem section of FC Barcelona to here.
:"Culés" is not a good name since it can be written in three different ways, in Catalan "Culers", in Spanish "Culés" and in Spanish without diacritics "Cules". That is why I think that "Supporters of FC Barcelona" is a better title.--SMP - talk (en) - talk (ca) 11:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mumblings

message: The list is a continuous growing mess, I propose split them in "reference sites", "fan sites" , ...  --Jor70 13:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links
Talk:Asshole (disambiguation)

message: I have removed this section as unencyclopedic and WP:NOR ... there is no mention of such a song in any of the referenced articles ... without references to albums on which the songs appear, these are just unverified claims. --72.75.105.165 19:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Asshole" in music

message: I have made comments before (which had been deleted) because the semantics are being used wrong. A human who is described such, behaves in a manner like that of the mentioned body part. Like a lover who treats me like shit, then dumps me. That happened to me, but I was an asshole too, and now she is my assholemate. But the most glaring example of assholeness, is someone who enjoys giving someone a shitty time or bad news, like a cop who has that asshole shaped smile on his face when he writes you the speeding ticket. An asshole is not just someone you don't like, it has to do with the reason you don't like the perp. It is not synonymous with Jerk (who is someone who behaves in a manner described in that popular Marilyn Monroe clip) If you want to know what an assholemate does, my lips are sealed but if you are a friend, I will relate to you a story that will make you laugh, cry, or ... (just make sure you have a box of Kleenex or roll of Charmin). Let's set the record straight: Assholes are not necessarily a bad thing for society; the world is full of shit. Sometimes we all feel the need to redirect some of our bad karma to someone who needs it. It is okay to do that, but just remember that when you do that, you are being Assholish.Markymarky 10:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is an ASSHOLE, really?

message: What is he doing on the disambiguation page for asshole. It has me confused and now i can't get to sleep. This is the worst day ever.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.126.49.23 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Edison

message: Please add an entry for Assholes: A Theory; a 2012 non-fiction book by Aaron James -- and 2019 film by John Walker -- some information about the film is in the book article.
-- 67.70.33.184 (talk) 15:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done: please see Special:Diff/928071185. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 16:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request - "A Theory" 

message: Please add an entry for the Gene Simmons song from the eponymous album (the title song)
Change
* Asshole (album), by Gene Simmons
To
* Asshole (album), by Gene Simmons
** "Asshole", a song by Gene Simmons from his album, Asshole (album)
I will note that not all albums have eponymous title songs, so this separate entry for the song is needed.
-- 67.70.33.184 (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done: please see Special:Diff/928071185. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 16:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request - Gene Simmons song
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sloppy Seconds

message: I would just like to say that those nominating Sloppy Seconds seemed to me to have done so for personal reasons: obviously they did not like the band's image and lyrics.  This is a rather frightening fact for bands that ought to be included on Wikipedia.  Not only did the band meet the criteria for NOT being deleted on several counts, they're known well enough within the punk scene, which arguably means they have some influence.  I agree that a wiki page on, say, my brother's high school band that never played more than five shows and never recorded a thing, should without question be deleted.  But lesser-known bands that were only around for a short time and never recorded more than a single album have had a great deal of influence and impact, and it isn't always easy to find sources to cite in order to prove this fact.  I can only say that I hope that people are not so eager to dismiss bands categorically simply out of their ignorance towards the band.--Reverend Distopia 19:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cut-out (recording industry)

message: I cannot believe something so commonplace needs sources. C'mon this is standard dicitonary definition stuff, and no i didn't write (most of ) it but it's on the money and anyone over 35 has seen these things, haven't they?
I didn't know what it meant. Not one of my 1000 compact discs has a cut spine.
I've added an image and a pair of references.  Article seems pretty complete to me - Foetusized 20:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The article doesn't say why this is done.  Why does the spine need to be marked?  Why not leave it unblemished and sell it as-is?  --Doradus (talk) 13:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  I'll attempt to address that in the article -- Foetusized (talk) 13:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  (Answer is here.) --Doradus (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 
Talk:David Shaffer

message: I am employed as a Research Scientist by the New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), at the Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC).  As part of my duties, I work as an editor in the Department of Psychiatry in CUMC. The text I am contributing is biographical material about faculty members in the Department, whom I may know personally, as they are my colleagues.  The material consists of biographical facts contained in the profiles of faculty members who appear on the Department's website.  Faculty members have reviewed and approved the content I am submitting.  
The material does not express a point of view or an opinion with respect to the profiles of the faculty.  Rather, as noted above, it consists only of facts about the faculty. Psychiatry777 (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Glowing exaggerations and falsehoods. Yeah, I'm sure they did "review and approve" this homage. Why not mention the total lack of evidence that Shaffer's money-making "instruments" have any effect whatsoever on already low youth suicide rates? Why not mention Shaffer's huge income from pharmaceutical industry sources? Why not mention TeenScreen's laughable 16% positive predictive value? GH-1959 (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Conflict-of-Interest declaration

message: I think this is an interesting starting point for a looking into the machinations of the psychiatric machine and its legally binding DSM.  Obvious other entry points for inquiry are the DSM itself, but the NIMH-DISC is the application of it first as a paper algorithm, and then as a computer program.  To make a long story short, the DISC is in the public domain as a product of the federal government, but apparently through Shaffer, this public domain information has been "annexed" (from Mumford) as a cash cow for Shaffer's associates at Columbia.  There is absolutely no reason that it should not be available for free as a web site because it is simple math.--John Bessa (talk) 22:58, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical inquiry
Talk:Dan Frawley (ice hockey)

message: I've created the 'Dan Frawley' article. Please, anyone who can add to the article, improve the article, do so. GoodDay 19:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dan Frawley

message: The article on the NHL player, Dan Frawley, was very well written, however there was no use of citations throughout the piece. The author may take note to use a reference other than the players biography from the hockey hall of fame as it may prove to be biased in his representation. There could be additions to his family life and childhood, life after he retired, as well as his status as a First Nations individual.Bernier4a (talk) 01:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  article review of Dan Frawley (ice hockey) 

message: 1. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
No, the article was very to the point. I believe they stayed very on track and very focused on Frawley and his life. They could have said more about his career, especially given after checking the sources used to write the article had more information to provide about him. But in terms of his life post-career, I think they did a proper job and stated the information necessary for the reader to get a picture of what his life is like after his NHL career has ended.
2. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
No, I believe the article stays on a very neutral viewpoint, with no positive or negative viewpoints sticking out. All in all a very neutrally written article, which is just the way we should be writing them.
3. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
I believe that every fact is. However, at the beginning of the article (part about his hockey career), there is a lack of references but this is made up for that you have his stats sheet just underneath the text. I believe this is reference enough to where he played during his hockey career. In addition, there is a lack of references for the information on his induction to the Amerks hall of fame. There is no reference given for it but there is a good sentence of information about it.
-Gordhan.Hillest (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article review (2018)
Talk:Hampstead tube station

message: I have deleted the statement that Hampstead is traditionally the North End of London. This is erroneous as until the second half of the 19th century Hampstead was a distinctly separated village north of the capital. The local area named "North End" gets its name as a consequence of it being at the northern edge of the Hampstead Heath. 18th and 19th century maps of Hampstead and the surrounding areas as also having places named "East End" (see East End Road in Finchley), "South End" (see South End Road near Hampstead Heath station) and "West End" (see West End Lane in West Hampstead). DavidCane 23:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hampstead as North End of London

message: I have deleted the unreferenced claim that Hampstead tube station is listed in the Guiness Book of Records as being the deepest below sea level. The surface buildings are at approx 110m AMSL and the platforms are said to be 58.5m below that. I haven't checked, but I doubt that a station 50m above sea level is going to be the lowest. Fi9 (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deepest Station ?
Talk:Totteridge & Whetstone tube station

message: The tube map shows this as Totteridge & Whetstone with the ampersand and not the word and.Railwayfan2005 (talk) 14:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Also part of the History section is a copy of a paragraph about High Barnet and names High Barnet and not this station at all. 87.194.81.2 (talk) 17:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Station names apart, the same paragraph can apply to any station from Finchley Central to High Barnet; so amended. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This articles has got the wrong name
Talk:West Finchley tube station

message: Re the passage "after a period where the station was serviced by both operators, LNER services ended in 1941" - the ref given doesn't verify that directly, but merely states "1941-03-02 East Finchley to Highgate closed [LNER]". The thing is, a new station was built at Highgate on a different site, and a stretch of new line was built for at least part of the distance between there and East Finchley. So, we would expect a closure date for the stretch from the "old" Highgate station, but were LNER services north of East Finchley still running up to that date, or had they ceased when Northern Line started? --Redrose64 (talk) 23:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  LNER service 

message: I've heard that some of the parts of the station (buildings, footbridge, etc.) were sourced from stations in the north that were closed during the depression. Does anyone have any information about this? 85.211.103.98 (talk) 23:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Materials 

message: thumb
To my knowledge, two sources (Pevsner and somewhere else, I think the old London Underground stations book) claim that the station footbridge comes from a 'Wintersett & Ryhill station' in Yorkshire and I've cited this. But this seems very hard to believe. If you look at photos taken there, like here and here, the footbridge looks different. The stairs look OK to match, but the top is all level whereas West Finchley's curves up, most in the outermost segments but also subtly closer to the centre. So if this is right the footbridge must have been modified considerably to fit into its new location, or possibly new sections were fabricated. (If so they did a classy job - the footbridge looks to be all of a piece now, and I would have thought that introducing a subtle curve in the metalwork would be a hard way to adapt it.) Worst of all, the second of those sources seems to have some text saying that the footbridge was still there in 1953: I can't make it appear on the page, but it comes up in google image search and if you view page source you see a caption saying that one of the photos (with footbridge) is of an excursion train visiting the line in 1953. So basically a huge mess  - I think further investigation is needed, but I'm now less and less certain that it comes from that specific station. I suppose it might have been a footbridge nearby on the line but not part of that station? In addition, the Wikipedia article on it says it's actually called Ryhill & Wintersett, which adds to my suspicions that the sources claiming it's from there are not to be trusted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.192.77 (talk) 06:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Youtuber Jago Hazzard covered West Finchley station today, and also noticed that the footbridge doesn't look like coming from Ryhill, but instead like the one at the next station down the line, Notton & Royston. I've added their video as a source. --Metrophil (talk) 18:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The footbridge
Talk:Safety coffin

message: Worth adding Video-Enhanced Grave Marker to the see also section? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 19:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I remember there was a Mythbusters episode on this topic. Anyone else remember that?--67.87.36.128 (talk) 04:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mythbusters
Talk:The Parable of Arable Land

message: You guys better start sourcing the ass off this page or it's going to get shit canned.--Soul Crusher (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

message: Would noting a few of the big bands who have covered/sampled some of the songs on this album be necessary, I feel it is vital information and very informative to know that bands like the Cramps, Pastels and even artists like Madlib have all paid tribute to the Red Krayola. Aradicus77 (talk) 22:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers, samples and influences on notable people.
Talk:Manushi

message: I removed a contribution from Special:Contributions/59.178.67.182 as it was original research and failed to meet NPOV standards. However, I'd like this user to contribute again with something that meets Wikipedia's standards. Interlingua  talk email 00:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sewa Nagar Post 

message: The journal has an own Internet page at www.manushi-india.org . I was not sure how to include that on the article page, so just this hint here.
Regards, 147.142.186.54 13:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet Page 

message: In error I pasted the wrong thing as my edit summary. Please ignore the link. Sorry. --JamesAM (talk) 17:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry about the edit summary