lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Allied Control Council

message: According to this page paper money was issued by the Royal Danish War Ministry between 1947 and 1958 for use in German territories occupied by Denmark. Where exactly was this territory? And were there others involved, other than the USA, the UK, the USSR, and France? 212.99.255.42 08:22, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denmark's Involvement 

message: I thought this article had a picture of the building that housed the ACC and BASC. It seems to have been deleted — but not removed here. Can a replacement be found? — squell 19:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: We should mention that it was the council that put pressure on the Hungarian government to cleanse its territory of the ethnic German minority living there.--Stor stark7 Speak 20:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsibility for ethnic cleansing 

message: I removed the stamp in the right upper corner, since it is depicting the wrong building, it shows the old building of the Kammergericht (an institution which was formerly the Supreme Court of Appeal of Prussia and after the latter's dismantling in 1947 it is now the Supreme Court of Appeal of the state of Berlin). The depicted building now serves as the entrance section of the Jewish Museum of Berlin. So I relocated the image to there, and to the page of the Kammergericht. From 1913 until its total destruction by an US air raid on February 3, 1945 the depicted building served the Prussian Union (Evangelical Christian Church) as Provincial Consistory for Brandenburg.   
In 1913 the Kammergericht moved into its new prestigious building. A photo of the building is displayed at the pertaining page. Since it wasn't destroyed in the war, it was seized for the Allied Control Council. After the abolition of the occupational status of Berlin in 1990 it was renovated and in 1997 the Kammergericht moved back in again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulf Heinsohn (talk • contribs) 03:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture of the stamp is depicting the wrong building
Talk:The Moon and Sixpence

message: Does anyone have any idea what the title, "The Moon and Sixpence" means, where it comes from, or what Maugham meant by it? I do not recognize it as a quote from anything.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.18.25.60 (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the Title 

message: I have removed from the In popular culture section the following: "The Moon and Sixpence is the name of a popular Irish pub in Portland, Oregon." Reason: uncited claim, probable commercial plug. To reinstate this claim, provide a reliable reference proving its notable popularity. WP is an encyclopedia. David Spector (user/talk) 13:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed commercial plug
Talk:Harry J. Sonneborn

message: I'll have to check but having read Ray Kroc's "Grinding it out" several times, I believe that Sonneborne's genius and real estatlkjke franchising ideas are discussed and acknowledged by Kroc.
---
Sonneborn, not Kroc, was CEO when Sonneborn departed.  Kroc was chairman.
His education ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.3.127.95 (talk) 15:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hum Saath-Saath Hain

message: Don't speedy-delete. I can save this page. Cnwb 08:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The first half of the movie is pure family fun and full of love" "So now we move onto the sweet childhood love story" etc etc.  Fliponymous (talk) 01:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic tone 

message: * A music review by Movie, a magazine published by Magna Publishing, who also published the Stardust magazine. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:JJ Lin

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Naschmarkt

message: http://www.naschmarkt-vienna.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.131.208 (talk) 01:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 
Talk:Necromunda

message: Expanded cawdor, orlock and the pit fighters. May require some sourcing or rewording.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.11.187 (talk) 17:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: Don't understand at all why that tag has been placed there?! Mathmo 06:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: unreferenced
Talk:Kunicon

message: Removed:
 Further, some disputes over the attendance numbers of the first Kunicon in 
 Miami, Florida were made by the owner of an established site that 
 reviews and photographs conventions in the area. This attendance controversy
 is discussed on thier site at Rising Sun.  There is also a
 small LiveJournal community dedicated to boycotting Kunicon,
 formed by an ex-employee. A derisive name, UsoCon, is being applied to it in these circles. "Uso" is a
 Japanese term for "liar."
The above is my edited version of the original content.  I had made an attempt to clean this clean this up to make it more NPOV while researching the statements made, but since I now find them to be centered around personal grievances of a few individuals, and their band of followers (not to say that there are not other disgruntled attendees, but they are in the minority, by far) This doesn't seem like it really belongs on an encyclopedic page.  Since nobody is monitoring this page anyway, I've taken it upon myself to try and fix it.  I'm no writer, I did what I could.  --68.209.108.64 11:12, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: This is what a wiki page for an anime convention should look like Anime Boston 
Wikipedia pages are a place for facts, not for your differences with the con or it's staff to be announced.  There is no evidence to back either your claims nor the con's claims.  This is all hearsay without documentation, and it is therefore non-encyclopedic.  This is not what a wiki article is supposed to be, until you can learn to present unbiased facts in an encyclopeidia format you should refrain from contributing.  (and no, I am NOT manny)
Wikipedia is an Encyclopiedia, See a Definition of a wikipiedia entry: Wikipedia
--68.209.108.64 05:52, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 

message: I've started adding references and cleaning up some of the NPOV content...but if someone else wants to continue where I left off, go right ahead! --PatrickD 06:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Peter Shilton

message: according to PFA Players' Player of the Year he was player of the year in 1978, but here it says later than that. which is true? F1list 08:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PFA player of the year when? 

message: I have noticed that most articles on International goalkeepers claim "He is considered one of the greatest goalkeepers of all time".  MortimerCat 11:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatest Goalkeeper 

message: According to the article on Hinckley United he isn't playing for them anymore Cavie78 16:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference in the article is to his son, Sam Shilton, who is still on Hinckley United's books Daemonic Kangaroo 17:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hinckley 

message: There is no distinction between men's football / women's football here. As there is no distinction the assertion that Peter Shilton "currently holds the record for playing more games for England than anyone else" is false, see Rachel Yankey's stats to prove http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Yankey.
Amend this as a point of urgency!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.178.33 (talk) 19:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Shilton is not the most capped England Footballer Rachel Yankey
Talk:Montbéliard

message: The citation [3] of https://www.thomasgraz.net/glass/gl-2426.htm seems to be circular, because the material cited is stated as "adapted from from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Château_de_Montbéliard"
2001:8003:DC0E:F201:8D99:498C:7B66:594C (talk) 11:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation [3]
Talk:Fairchild Dornier 728 family

message: Support: - THis page ought to cover the 528, 728, and 928. In addition, as "728JET" was later changed to just "728", the article should be renamed, possibly to Fairchild-Dornier 728 family. The Dornier 328 also needs alot of work, and should be renamed to [[Fairchild-Dornier 328 if it is going to include the 328JET, as it does now. - BillCJ 01:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still needs work now that I've done the merge. However, at least it's a start. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 04:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: wouldn't it be better to put the characteristics into a table, so as to be able to compare the 3 - quatzalcoatl 18:04 09/06/2007 (UTC)
:Done Reedy Boy 21:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table

message: Let's use this format for references.  If not, what is your suggestion.
 found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_news Archtransit (talk) 01:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: We all know what the aircraft looked like.  However, we shouldn't assume that the readers will know.  Looking for basic information about the aircraft.  Since there are no pictures, some description (such as low wing, 2 engines) may be useful.  Either that or a link to a photo (not the photo itself unless we can find a legal one). 
In other aircraft articles, there is some description of the basic design in this section. Archtransit (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Design
Talk:Faina Ranevskaya

message: To: Ghirlandajo:
I insist on removal of your intro on Ranevskaya. It contains no valuable information, but English language mistakes (quote: "and a hero of many a Russian anecdote"), and there is discrepancy with major biographical sources dedicated to Ranevskaya. 
E.g. Ranevskaya's father wasn't a "Jewish oil tycoon", but he owned a dry-ink factory in the city of Taganrog. That's two different things. Then, Ranevskaya was buried on the Donskoe Cemetery, a cemetery of the Donskoy Monastery near Moscow and not on Novodevichie. Another fact - you mentioned the play "The Rest is Silence" - your translation of "Dalshe - tishina" is not correct, since this is a Vina Delmar's play and its original title is "Make Way for Tomorrow". 
Thank you for your contribution with photos, but I insist on my version of the text.
------
Ranevskaya never played in Ivan the Terrible, so it couldn't be her photo.  As a matter of fact, that is the photo of Serafima Birman, who received a Stalin's Award for her role.
:Wrong. It seems like you know nothing about her bio. Ranevskaya made sample photos for Ivan the Terrible, but Eisenstein was not satisfied with the result and preferred to cast Birman. The latter looks so different that I'm amazed that you could confuse the two. The photo is taken from Ranevskaya webpage at http://faina.narod.ru/photo02.html --Ghirlandajo 06:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " (she was never approved for the part) by the Soviet government officials who did not want a Jewish actress to play the part of Princess Staritskaya"--194.145.161.227 16:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced
Talk:Statue of Father Damien

message: I have seen the statue of Fr. Damien in person, and I could swear that it was made from volcanic lava. Very appropriate for Hawaii!24.121.195.165 (talk) 09:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have seen the statue of Fr. Damien 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure)  Colonestarrice (talk) 11:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Father Damien (Escobar) →  – This is the recommended style for public statues at MOS:ART/TITLE. No disambiguation is needed as there are no other statues of Father Damien with articles (per WP:D2D). Ham II (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 December 2021
Talk:Non-monotonic logic

message: This article is impenetrable to anyone who doesn't already know what "monotonic logic" is, and the article on "monotonic logic" is equally opaque.  Arguably, this article is useless.  How can it be improved? Examples?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.156.145.5 (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Seven years later and I have to agree, it remains completely impenetrable and largely useless. It requires someone who understands the concept to break it down in simple language. At the moment it's pretty much an archetypal example of how not to write a Wikipedia article. 2.121.223.8 (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: This used to be the first paragraph of the article:
When declaiming a line of reasoning, it is the custom to present a case for the object of discourse. During the argument, the propositions are steadily built up, monotonically increasing. But, in non-monotonic logic, the propositions are defeasible; that is, if an impasse is reached, the propositions can be abandoned; thus the number of valid propositions no longer has to increase steadily, but can even decrease and further fluctuate.
And this used to be the second one:
This form of reasoning can be used to model thought, as in the scientific method, where hypothetical explanations can be abandoned in the light of further evidence from observation, inference, and experiment.
My point is that "non-monotonic logics" are formal logics, that is, are a way of formalizing the more general issue of "non-monotonic reasoning", which should have a separate article (but currently has not). Since the non-monotonic logics are family of logics, I have changed the incipit of the article with the formal logic definition of a non-monotonic logic (i.e., a logic not having the monotonicity property).Paolo Liberatore 11:22, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Logic Definition

message: Anyone feel like adding some discussion of the semantics and representations theorems for non-monotonic logic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.121.170.218 (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Semantics
Talk:Road signs in the United Kingdom

message: While watching Police Interceptors season 7 episode 1, I noticed a roadway sign for "Stamford" on the first line, and "A1" on the next line. To the right of the "A1" was an orange square, about the same height as the "A1", with a black circle in the square; it almost looked like an afterthought (couldn't tell whether it was painted or embossed. I could not find a meaning for it on the web. I presume it meant there's a roundabout, but, don't most such intersections have one? So, what does it mean? Skaizun (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Was it a diversion route? the wub "?!" 21:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Black Circle in Orange Rectangle
Talk:Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

message: The sentence "It has the highest number of workers in the financial sector, and the lowest number working in the retail sector; it also has the most highly-qualified population, with 56% at the highest level of education" is not supported by the link [3] pointing to election results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.179.236.25 (talk) 11:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Workers

message: The link to the newspaper no longer works and is not obvious from a websearch. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: K and C Times

message: 2009 November 26* — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 15:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming of related categories 

message: The "Politics" section says:
This contradicts Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council election, 2014 which says there were 37 Conservative, 12 Labour and 1 Lib Dem. Which is correct? The Council website itself says there are a total of 50. Hairy Dude (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Councillors etc 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
See under Libraries below. Dori1951 (talk) 11:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea]] 

message: Could someone please correct the link to the Council's libraries page: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/libraries/libraries ?
After two attempts I have been unable to do it properly.  Thanks. Dori1951 (talk) 11:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libraries 

message: This isn't in Kensington and Chelsea but in Westminster - please amend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.89.162 (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed. It is in the Knightsbridge and Belgravia ward of Westminster, east of Queens Gate and north of Imperial College Road, the boundary with the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. See eg location description for planning applications received by Westminster. I'll remove it. NebY (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Albert Hall

message: The redirect Kensington and Chelsea LGD has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  NebY (talk) 10:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kensington and Chelsea LGD]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Thomas Holloway

message: I am proposing to remove this statement on the following 2 grounds
(a) the citation does not appear to justify the statement
(b) lack of efficacy was actually the norm in the 19th century
any objections?
Brownturkey (talk) 08:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  scientific evaluation of them after his death showed that few of them contained any ingredients which would be considered to be of significant medicinal value
Talk:Borough of Dartford

message: This article is a bit disappointing, especially since there have been so many changes to it. It is very much of a "cobbled-together" thing, without any headings or seemingly any flow. History is mixed up with today, for example: and seems not to follow a chronological order. There are some sweeping statements - such as the one where "Dartford has become a dormitory town for commuters to London". I cannot believe this to be other than sheer guesswork: knowledge of the area will show that there are a wide variety of occupations in the borough which will need local employment. As a start there is the huge area alongside the Dartford Crossing ("Crossways") and that is just one of such areas. Of course a lot of people DO go on the trains at rush hour - but do they all go to "London" (whatever that may mean!)? 
I don't have time at the moment to make any changes, but I would suggest that the classic arrangement of the article ought to be:
* opening statement - where it is and a brief summary of any really important facts (eg transport links via the Thames)
* history - bring together in chronological order all the info (and check that there isn't anything else vide the borough website)
* communications - include the ferry service to the continent (Dart Ferries); and Farningham Road is missed from the stations. Ebbsfleet station will be in Gravesham, not Dartford, although the line will tunnel under the Thames in the borough
* industry of yesterday and today (all those industrial estates must do something!!!) and - BLUEWATER
* important buildings in the borough: churches (not just in Dartford town), Orchard Theatre, Manor Gatehouse (Tudor) etc
* population figures; & other demographic facts
* other info - Mick Jagger Centre and so on
Peter Shearan 12:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Dartford article has recently had an overhaul, and as follow-up has been nominated for peer review. Since editors to this article are likely to know something about Dartford as well, any edits you can make to the Dartford article or comments on the the peer review itself would be very useful. Thanks in advance! Jdcooper 23:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dartford]] peer review 
Talk:The Ticket That Exploded

message: My first article.  Feel free to elaborate or correct any errors.
Dr Ellipso 12:26, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Why is there an External Link to the essay "Electronic Revolution" here? I don't see any connection to The Ticket That Exploded. If no connection can be made I'll move the link to the main William S. Burroughs article. If it happens to be part of the book, this needs to be noted. 23skidoo 13:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Electronic Revolution link

message: Simply quoting from the book's introduction does no good at all. Is there a plot? Who is Agent Lee? Why is this work considered notable? I came to this page because "language is a virus" redirected me here, but there is no reference at all to that. What is cut-up method? I can't really stand the cult of personality built up around Burroughs and his writing but I understand that he has many fans so I'd ask someone who cares about his work to attempt to fix these problems. Xenomorph erotica (talk) 15:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this book about?
Talk:List of languages of Russia

message: I made this page with data from Ethnologue. Feel free to add number of speakers to each language, or to improve the article in any other way.
Punkmorten 12:39, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ethnologue mentions Mandarin Chinese in Russian but doesn't provide figures. The number of Mandarin speakers in Russia must be substantial - 0.5% or 680,000 people (taking account either legal or illegal Chinese immigrants in Russia), including 30-40 thousand Dungans. http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=RUA --Atitarev (talk) 23:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandarin Chinese in Russia - any figures? 

message: Division of languages as "related to European Russia" and "related to Asian Russia" is artificial. Better use division based on linguistic families, like in article in Russian wikipedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.25.228.110 (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division between European Russia and Asian Russia 

message: The Chukchi and Koryak languages are not included in this list. Is any information available about the number of speakers of these languages in Russia? Jarble (talk) 07:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chukchi and Koryak languages
Talk:Mapinguari

message: Never mind-Occono
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Occono (talk • contribs) 14:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whose legend is this anyway? Kortoso  (talk) 23:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: I've expanded this article quite a bit, but haven't added any information from the Spanish and Portuguese Wikipedia articles, since none of the unique information on those pages is actually sourced. Also, for reference, the Portuguese article includes two (unsourced) sightings not mentioned in any English works. --Bradypus Tamias (talk) 20:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion