Talk:Brahma Kumaris/Archive 6

message: Dear Jesselp; Yeah.. I can feel it....Soul conscious love is the one which brings harmony.
With loving detachment, avyakt7 00:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jesselp Happy New Year, attachment is a natural human condition, so keep spreading the wiki love. PEACETalkAbout 22:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That image is disturbing, not to mention ugly... Happy '07! Sfacets 19:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 07 is the year of wiki love and harmony.

message: I have removed the geocites EL along with two links that basiclaly advertise two different retreat centers. I think some of the links that describe programs of the BK could be incorporated into the article... I may give this a whirl.Sethie 17:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: EL section

message: Hope that's OK with everyone. I archived from before 20th Dec so that's conversations over 3 weeks old. I used the copy/paste method to archive so that live conversations can be kept on this page and also to be consistent with previous archives. Bksimonb 18:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived old discussion

message: We have a disruptive editor making daily edits with provocative summaries made by random IP addresses that have never edited before. The edits are disruptive in that they constantly re-introduce material that was deleted with good reason after sufficient time-out for other editors to comment. Specifically, they introduce material that 244 was known to champion. Also the style of editing is consistent with how 244 was behaving just before arbitration.
* Making a barrage of edits in succession which incrementally amount to a revert ,
* Re-introducing material that was removed because it was not adequately sourced, made contentious claims, linked to attack sites or other good reasons why it was legitimately removed ,
* Mixed with other edits so he can scream, "Hey! Look! They are reverting valid edits too!" ,
* Taunting edit summaries    and discussion topics ,
* Disruptive edits tend to follow a daily or twice-daily cycle.
I suggest that any editor about to make a constructive edit, please check the recent history of the article so that you don't inadvertently start editing a mangled version of the article.  If necessary revert, then edit. This is also part of the game, to see if he/she can dupe anyone into reverting other editor's edits in the crossfire.
Page semi-protection has been requested by avyakt7. However there is a case of a suspected "submarine" sock-puppet log-in account where a user performed a number of incognito minor edits to unrelated articles  then suddenly flipped and made a contentious edit to this article based on a tabloid article that 244 was strongly promoting  .
Regards Bksimonb 06:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, semi-protected will solve things real quick. Sethie 07:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disruptive Edits

message: Dear all, I will request a "check user" on this user ID and 244's IP. It is  evident that 244 is back with different sockpuppet accounts. "Some people believe" have been reverting the article. 244 proxy trick did not work any longer so he is forced to use another of his several accounts. Best, avyakt7 21:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest listing all the IPs used in the correct format for checkuser. See see previous request concerning the proxy attacks . It is unlikely the 244 IP address you listed would be used. Regards Bksimonb 17:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sockpuppet account belonging to 244 has infringed the 3RR  Is an admin going to block him? Best, avyakt7 18:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you again Thatcher131.It seems to me that 244 will keep on trying with different user names and  /or IPs if the door is open. Best, avyakt7 14:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some people believe