Talk:Cole Hamels

message: Inferences removed, it's just listed stats. I would like there to be something linked to and/or quoted to allow readers to see the relevance of the stats, though. Does there need to be an article that actually used them to present why Hamels was pretty much the same pitcher in 2009? I could find a list of articles and post them here and people could pick which one should go in to the article.  71.115.203.23 (talk) 23:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that is the way it should be done encyclopedically. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 02:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008-2009

message: It's already in the article that Hamels got a 5-day suspension.  He also got an undisclosed fine.
I am hearing that in that game, Hamels was himself later hit by a pitch, and at that time both benches were warned.
In the hit by pitch article here on Wikipedia, I went to the talk page and noted a 1966 game where there were 3 hit batsmen.  In the 2nd and 3rd of those, the hit batter was the pitcher who issued the previous hit-by-pitch.  There was no DH rule then, and that was the NL anyway, so the pitcher had to be part of the batting order.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted that paragraph. Aside from the fact that I don't know that "RookPost" is a reliable source, I don't see anything so noteworthy about the event. Pitchers throw at hitters all the time, and throwing at Harper makes sense given the hype. It's undue weight to give it its own paragraph. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

text: I didn't notice that it was reinserted. I deleted it again as WP:UNDUE, and WP:UNSOURCED. If a source can demonstrate some lasting impact of this event, it can stay, but I think it's already over and forgotten. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2012 hit-batter incident 

message: Mostly for Go Phightins! and me, here is a to-do list for the article for GA. Feel free to add anything to it.
* Starting copyedit -  öBrambleberry of RiverClan 22:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: @ - No, I am not signed up for the WikiCup because my activity can be unpredictable. I can definitely work on the season summaries! That sounds like something I'd be interested in. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a few articles that may help – . If you are not an ESPN Insider, the pertinent information from that article is, "That leaves mainly the pitching. Cliff Lee should remain Cliff Lee and Cole Hamels is headed for a rebound season -- his 3.26 FIP in a disappointing 2013 actually was slightly better than the 3.30 in his 17-win 2012 season. But there's no cheap solution available to fix the rotation, so team ownership will have to open its wallet if 2014 is to not be wasted." Let me know if you use it, and I can cite it. Go Phightins! 20:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Steve hasn't responded yet; I'll get to work on finding another picture. -Newyorkadam (talk) 01:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

text: Right now, the biggest issue is the season-by-season stuff, which needs to be written in summaries, and better-cited. I thought Brambleberry wanted to do that, so I had not, however might be able to in a few days. Busy today, tomorrow, and Wednesday. Go Phightins! 22:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . I have just finished a season review for 2007, and think that is a decent model of how we want each season summary to look - a mix of key games, columnist commentary, statistics, and summative analysis. If you want to work on some other seasons, I can work on some as well, and by maybe the end of next week, we can be ready to nominate this for GA? Go Phightins! 20:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll take a look at your changes, and sure, end of next week sounds good :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

text: I think so. And she has not edited in almost three weeks, so I don't know. I will do the honors. Go Phightins! 21:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to get someone on IRC to do the review to expedite the process. -Newyorkadam (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do list 

message: I'm placing the no hitters in the infobox in the order in which they occurred: the combined no hitter came first so I'm listing it first. Bob305 (talk) 01:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Bob305, I understand your rationale, but wouldn't you agree that a solo no-hitter is more of an accomplishment than a combined no-hitter? From what I've generally noticed, the more impressive achievements usually tend to be listed higher in infoboxes. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A guy saved by Jesus, you make a good point. I've reversed the order. Bob305 (talk) 04:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No hitters 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cole Hamels. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for //proathletesonly.com/news/featured/baseballs-young-stars-caught-in-salary-trap/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cole Hamels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120302112738/http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20050201&content_id=937908&vkey=news_phi&fext=.jsp&c_id=phi to http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20050201&content_id=937908&vkey=news_phi&fext=.jsp&c_id=phi
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://proathletesonly.com/news/featured/baseballs-young-stars-caught-in-salary-trap/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090320044032/http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090317&content_id=4004206&vkey=news_phi&fext=.jsp&c_id=phi to http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090317&content_id=4004206&vkey=news_phi&fext=.jsp&c_id=phi
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The redirect Heidi Strobel has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Heidi Strobel]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]