Talk:Thirty-six Views of Mount Fuji

message: What are the sizes of the prints?
Are they all formated to fit in a portfolio?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicky Beep (talk • contribs) 00:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Print sizes

message: Wasn't this parodied on one of John Mayer's live albums? (As Is)
::I'm sure it's been copied, parodied, used as inspiration, and otherwise made reference to in a gazillion different ways. Doesn't make a trivia section necessary. LordAmeth 14:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If an individual image has been extensively copied, parodied, and so on, then a "Cultural references" section might be useful as a way of documenting and illustrating just how influential the image has been, after sufficient material has been collected ... but if so, that section would need to be added (with suitable restraint) to the wikipedia page for that individual image The_Great_Wave_off_Kanagawa (or, in extreme cases, as a separate offshoot wikipage), not to the "36 views ..." page. IMO.  PS: I've just looked up the Mayer "cascading bunnies" album art version. Funny! Thanks. ErkDemon (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fyi: The art from As/Is is by Kozyndan, and was originally created as a cover for the magazine Giant Robot (see issue). The image is called "Uprisings", and you can buy a print for $15 (which I did, and adore). :) -- Quiddity (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Mayer 

message: 1. If the work was conceived as a collection of 36 pieces, which of the pieces are the original 36?
2. The order of the lists for the English and the Japanese versions of this article do not match. Which is the correct/original order?
ICE77 -- 84.223.76.202 17:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Originals and order 

message: I made this table as like as one in the russian Wikipedia. And now we need a good introduction. Gruznov Mikhail (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Marvelous work. Much thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 19:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I wish you had done it in the proper order. JHobson3 (talk) 14:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table 

message: In 36 Views of Mount Fuji (Hokusai)#Additional 10, Image #3 needs to be checked. The description in the text does not match the file name, but possibly the image is right. See also . Fg2 (talk) 08:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So why didn't you fix it? I just did. JHobson3 (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image:Nakahara in the Sagami province.jpg 

message: How is it that "A collection of 300-year-old woodblock Thirty-six Views of Mount Fuji prints contained in the wellness spa of the Costa Concordia was lost during the collision of the ship on January 13, 2012," if the oldest of the prints, created no earlier than 1826, was at most 186 years old, and the newest of the prints, created no later than 1833, was perhaps only 179 years old at the time of the sinking?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.168.135.149 (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costa Concordia 

message: Is there a reason for all these illustrations being reproductions when early examples exist? The colours are more subtle and subdued, but the original prints are far superior in my, and most commentators' opinion. Could do a side-by-side comparison for each print? Dark Clouds of Joy (talk) 03:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Mainly ignorance, and the originals seeming weaker images. Feel free to change them. Johnbod (talk) 04:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers. I might do it. Quite a job, mind. Dark Clouds of Joy (talk) 04:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Facsimile prints