lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Special Field Orders No. 15

message: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/40acres/ps_so15.html says this is, at least partially, based on fact.  It shouldn't qualify for a speedy delete. --Mr. Vernon 05:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual? 

message: I added a reference linking to the text of the order so that it can be used for further additions to the article grifterlake (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text of order 

message: Sherman had limited war time powers and only during war. This didn't pass by act of congress and as I recall didn't go before congress. This was enacted by law nor signed into law by the president. So why would they have any concrete effect?70.15.191.119 (talk) 06:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In war time military orders have tremendous effect. 2601:140:8900:61D0:75AF:22A4:C1F4:33C2 (talk) 00:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny thought 

message: Read the 5th amendment. It concerns abit more than simply the right not incriminate yourself. 
"nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;"
But since slavery was legal what would they have been charged with? Treason? That gives you the right to do a couple of things but I don't think that would give you the right to take their property. Why? Try how. Such abilities are rare and banned. It would take a Bill of attainder which is banned. Check out article one section 9.
It could also be done with eminent domain but they'd have to pay for it and well needless to say it would be public land and not private land so no 40 acres for any one person. I mean there are possibly a few other ways but so few that would have had in chance during that time period. But again Sherman wasn't a elected member of congress. His authority was small and limited by time. Congress never undertook the above actions.70.15.191.119 (talk) 06:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a rebellion, they had lost all rights and the constitution didn't apply to them. They were foreigners without rights. 2601:140:8900:61D0:75AF:22A4:C1F4:33C2 (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further more 

message: "Special Field Orders, No. 15 (series 1865) were military orders issued during the American Civil War, on January 16, 1865, by General William Tecumseh Sherman, commander of the Military Division of the Mississippi of the United States Army.[1] They provided for the confiscation of 400,000 acres (1,600 km2) of land along the Atlantic coast of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida and the dividing of it into parcels of not more than 40 acres (0.16 km2),[2] on which were to be settled approximately 18,000 formerly enslaved African American families and other Africans then living in the are "
Are? Are what?
131.193.240.141 (talk) 08:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It was vandalism. I fixed it. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 17:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first paragraph just cuts off
Talk:More Adventurous

message: I changed "Accidntal Deth" to "Accidental Deth" based upon the track listing at http://www.rilokiley.com/. Olessi 05:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song title

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 21:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Ability grouping

message: Should the arguments for and against be separated again, or is it readable as it is? Cathryn 03:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate pros/cons? 

message: I found the article on the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation's website to be quite informative and fairly well sourced:
http://www.edexcellence.net/detail/news.cfm?news_id=127
Maybe this and the resources sighted could be a source for expanding the scope of this article?
Thanks!
Greenmrt 19:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources for further citation and information in this article.
Talk:Fawkner, Victoria

message: Light clutch!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.14.164 (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Glenroy, Victoria

message: Glenroy is not the largest suburb in Melbourne, this rubbish needs a permanent change.
: Check out the article. This has been removed. Eyedubya 12:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes need to be made 
Talk:List of the seven natural wonders of Georgia (U.S. state)

message: This is too short to really be a separate article, and not likely to grow. It could easily be covered in the main Georgia article. Daniel Case 05:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Providence Canyon is a purely artificial phenomenon, created by farmers poorly managing land in the area, digging huge ditches that snowballed into this disaster. It's not even two centuries old. — Kaz (talk) 21:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Providence Canyon is Not Natural
Talk:Morris Chestnut

message: When Morris' name is added to the category of "Phi Beta Sigma brothers", it gets deleted each time. Does anyone have an explanation for this? Lesanichelle 05:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added his name to the Phi Beta Sigma brothers' list one day as well, and it was deleted the same day. I don't see why his name should not be on the list because it states in the article that Chestnut is a member of Phi Beta Sigma. There are also several sources on the Internet that back up this claim also. 209.215.58.250 19:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Wow, it's a shame that these people don't believe you, and you are a Sigma yourself. Unbelievable. TamYum 06:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions & comments: Morris Chestnut page

message: Morris Chestnut is not a member of Phi Beta Sigma. Although his name appears on about 75 Phi Beta Sigma websites, he is definitely not a member of Phi Beta Sigma. And you can verify this by contacting Phi Beta Sigma through their official website www.pbs1914.org.
Also, you may look at their "official" notable members list. If he was a member he would have been listed on the national Phi Beta Sigma website and he is not: http://www.pbs1914.org/sigmatoday/notablesigmaentertainment.asp
Or you may chat with members of Phi Beta Sigma at http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?s=e82a1c4d5b17db99c48317fa63e41800&threadid=36400&highlight=morris
U Guys are funny. --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 19:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Answers & comments: Morris Chestnut page

message: Morris Chestnut's father is a singer quite well known to Northern & Rare Soul fans. I haven't edited the main page to reflect that as I while I believe the sourcing meets Wikipedia's biography standards, that may not be the perception of other editors, and Morris Chestnut Sr does not have his own wikipedia page. I think its an interesting biographical note though, as indicated by the discussion on one of the links.
The sources are: Morris Chestnut Jr's facebook page "Morris Chestnut: Happy Father's Day"; the main Northern Soul online reference (a forum)"Soul Source:Morris Chestnut""Soul Source:The Vows"; a collector's blog."Blog:Morris Chestnut" Conan The Librarian (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Morris Chestnut Sr

message: This is a notice that there is a draft for The Best Man: The Final Chapters at Draft:The Best Man: The Final Chapters until such a time that it is ready for inclusion in the mainspace. All are welcome to come help nurture the article's development there. — YoungForever(talk)  00:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft article for the TV series ''The Best Man: The Final Chapters'' 

message: You forgot to mention in the film category that he also acted along Robert Dinero in the movie Bus 657 77.246.53.147 (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Where does Morris Chestnut currently live?? Is he still with his wife Pam? 2604:2D80:A702:C700:1962:EF13:76B5:47AD (talk) 07:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morris
Talk:Front-end processor (IBM)

message: There is another article entitled Front end processor which is more abstract. This article seems highly IBM specific. I have a more accurate article at IBM 3705 Communications Controller.
The term "network processing software" is suspicious. A quick Google search doesn't mention it nor does IBM 3704 and 3705 Principle of Operation. The desciption of the interface between 3705 CCU and adapater and scanner interfaces is somewhat flawed. Priority of various communicaton lines is determined by hardware (assisted by two software-set priority bits associated with each line). Changing a half-duplex lineset to full-duplex requires an external cable change (and reduces the number of lines by one).
This article should probably be deleted.Rdmoore6 05:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:South Melbourne

message: The claim about the first municipality in Victoria is also made on the Collingwood, Victoria page (by, um, myself actually - based on a now-dead link to a page from the Collingwood Historical Society), and this page doesn't give dates in 1955 to back up either claim.  Any better references?
Also, should "In Ordine Primum" match the motto in the arms? Ben White 11:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking of the arms, as the arms of a defunct entity, are they really appropriate for the infobox, even if the former city is the same area as the area discussed by this article? JPD (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Found the reference - Collingwood is actually about a month older than South Melbourne, so I've reflected this in the article. Ben White 10:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First municipality?
Talk:New York State Route 210

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. In addition, the notation of the actual road in New Jersey was added to the southern terminus via Google Earth (no county route number was detectable). It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 05:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template, and addition to Southern Terminus
Talk:Robert Maynard

message: The end of the article has Maynard listed in the Category "British Pirates". Is this true? Was the guy who killed Blackbeard, at one point in his life, a pirate?  75.90.45.229 (talk) 17:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No he was not although apparently he did help himself to some of the money after the battle which did not happen off the coast of North Carolina but in the Pamlico Sound which is inshore ie west of the barrier island  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:2340:9470:4155:A65C:D5CF:95AF (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pirate
Talk:Snow White Tan

message: Will chestser release any videos to go with the songs. I heard a rumor that he wasn't. Or it could of just been my friend making up stuff. --219.88.47.249 05:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but it's impossible to tell at this point. Jay 15:08, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Music videos

message: I'm to lazy to edit the page but I think it should be since it repeats its self in the second paragraph
:I've edited out the duplication, and rewritten the majority of it, including extra bits of info etc. Should be up-to-date now.--crewdy 09:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Move to Dead By Sunrise, anyone?  Hello2112 19:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably soon, but there is still no official confirmation of a name change. I know it all points to that, but with Wikipedia's strict rules, I'd maybe wait a bit to see if Chester elaborates any on the band(s). There's also some Fort Minor Militia and Linkin Park Underground chats soon, somebody could/might ask then. Jay 03:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah, ok.  Hello2112 22:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Critical criminology

message: Chesney-Lind, M., & Morash, M. (2013). Transformative feminist criminology: A critical re-thinking of a discipline. Critical Criminology, 21(3), 287-304.
Uggen, C. and Inderbitzin, M. (2010), Public criminologies. Criminology & Public Policy, 9: 725-749. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00666.x
   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anton7278 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: Social Science, not science stub. --RealGrouchy 06:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is no longer a stub. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong stub tag 

message: This really is a potentially great, interesting article. I hope it isn't going to be forgotten about and that the people who know what they are talking about can find the time to finish it off.Astralusenet 19:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  To add to the this, it is important to elaborate on the theoretical aspect of criminology, and also highlighting the historical development of critical criminology. I also agree upon source as a great starting point: Reclaiming Critical Criminology: Social Justice and the European Tradition- Rene Van Swaaningen.--Anton7278 (talk) 11:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting Article
Talk:List of Dave Matthews Band Songs

message: This page is absoutely stupid.  Song titles linking to a generic wikipedia result?  De-wikify the whole thing or just simply delete the page.
: Yeah, I agree, it doesn't really contribute anything more than track listings on the album pages do. Adm58 00:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the point.  Most songs don't have their own pages to link to.  This page is pretty much useless... I guess it redirects now?  That seems confusing.  I would delete it.  Adm58 16:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Indian English literature

message: The article is not comprehensive enough.
What does IWE mean? There is no explanation anywhere in the text. 134.96.65.123 13:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Ten Twentieth-Century Indian Poets was published in 1976 not 1977, as listed on the copyright page. And "Twentieth-Century" is hypenated as on the title page. And sorry to anyone that favors "U P" for "University Press", I just favor the latter and think it looks better on the page; but of course this is just a point of style and entirely up for discussion or argumentation. Thanks, Galo1969X 06:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References -- Parthasarathy  

message: "Many popular writers from Indian origin today go very far in terms of modesty to hand over the reins of inspiration to new found lands, new found freedoms of expression contained in their writing.............. all offer delectable samples of IWE."
IMHO it requires clean-up and focus. I do not quite understand the point being made.
I think the article will suffer little, if the entire para is deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.181.15.80 (talk) 21:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Para is long and Rambling 

message: I removed two references about this completely unknown author that have no business being in what is otherwise a fine article. He is a red link for the good reason that there is absolutely nothing to be found about him in VIAF or World Cat, and google results only return this article. If he is not a complete hoax, he is definitely not a notable writer. Xuxl (talk) 16:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanjeev Kumar Solanki
Talk:Shukongoshin

message: This was mentioned previously. All sources indicate that "Kongorikishi" and "Shukongoshin" are essentially the same thing and not the difference between "Agyō" and "Ungyō." I suggest that the two articles be merged into Nio and then perhaps separate pages could be made for Agyō and Ungyō. Sudachi 06:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Sudachi. Could you check this article? It seems to me that Kongorikishi is the wrestler, and Shugongoshin the one holding the Diamond rod. As far as I understand, they are also assimilated to Agyo and Ungyo respectively. Regards PHG 12:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Two Rivers, Wisconsin

message: These edits  seem generally trivial, non-notable, and original research - three things we try to avoid when writing good encyclopedia articles. I've reverted twice, and they shouldn't be re-inserted unless in better accordance to WP's standards. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I can't speak for other editors, the factualness of an entry is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for inclusion in an encyclopedia. For example, the statement "Joe Smith used to run a gas station in Two Rivers, but doesn't anymore" might be true, but it is not notable for an encyclopedia article about the city. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (That said, some of your contributions have been included in the article in a more appropriate fashion) --ZimZalaBim (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WALRUS's edits 

message: Does this town have no history?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:490E:292:5D68:C066:5882:D738 (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Kongorikishi

message: This was mentioned previously. All sources indicate that "Kongorikishi" and "Shukongoshin" are essentially the same thing and not the difference between "Agyō" and "Ungyō." I suggest that the two articles be merged into Nio and then perhaps separate pages could be made for Agyō and Ungyō. Sudachi 07:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Professional wrestling in the United Kingdom

message: Did some improvements to the later section of the article some months ago.  The FWA as most notable promtion strikes me as very POV.  Old school promotions such as Premier especially and to a fair extent All Star still do a lot of the traditional British style of technical wrestling.  The only real evidence to support this would be youtube vids which are not acceptable sources on Wikipedia, but if I may recommend:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfIXTs19JN0
81.156.164.14 (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: The section on wrestling in Wales reads like an advert for one particular promotion and its owner, and references an event from 13 years ago for seemingly no reason. Looking through the edit history, it appears to have been written by someone from the promotion in question and strikes me as a violation of WP:SOAP and WP:NOR. I think a rewrite is in order, but lack the subject knowledge to do so myself. —Zoey (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh Wrestling 

message: , possibly you are not British yourself and therefore not aware of this, but Channel 5 (British TV channel) is one of the five "traditional"  (pre-digital analogue terrestrial) TV channels in the UK and therefore any wrestling getting a berth on there is a prestigious outlet for that promotion and worth a mention in the article (see also WCW's run on the channel 1999-2001)   Even after the analogue switchoff in the early 2010s, it is still as big a deal as a wrestling show on ITV1 or Channel 4 or even BBC1 or BBC2. It's certainly at least as big a deal as graveyard slot runs of WCW 1990-1992.  And no, I'm not a fan of Channel 5 at all (most of its output is garbae) but it IS considered a mainstream national TV channel on par with BBC1&2, ITV1 and CH4 here in the UK Romomusicfan (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think WWF Sunday Night Heat's run on Channel 4 2000-2001 also deserves a mention.Romomusicfan (talk) 10:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel 5
Talk:1940 Summer Olympics

message: Is there any type of main image anyone can get for this to make this look similar to the other pages of the Olympic Games? 
Was there ever one created for these games?
A program cover, official logo, etc.?
I'm shaky on the legality of uploading images, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardshark04 (talk • contribs)  20:05, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: image
Talk:Lupe fiasco

message: Should Lupe fiasco simply redirect to Lupe Fiasco?  If no one has a problem with that I'll make that change tomorrow. John (Jwy) 07:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. May be cached here for a bit. John (Jwy) 01:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anthony Gaggi

message: This article is way off on key facts. WAY off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.114.195.245 (talk • contribs). 
*In response to above: Rewrites are underway, and using the only real source I have available, that being the book Murder Machine. It would be appreciated if instead of just commenting on how WAY off the key facts are, you would contribute the correct information so we can make the article as factually accurate as it can possibly be. Or, at the least, point out which specific facts are wrong so I know what to look for. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dugrad (talk • contribs).
*Yes, it is frustrating to see the above criticism here, unspecific as it is.  I've been trying to augment the detail of the biography using the only easily accessible source I know of -- Murder Machine, already mentioned above by Dugrad.  In so doing, I've also been trying to correct passages that were slightly misleading.  Runoldhare (talk) 06:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies
Talk:Dizi (instrument)

message: Proposal:  change article title to Dizi.  As it's not a proper noun, the capital "Z" doesn't make sense, and most Chinese instruments are written in pinyin as a single word.  Badagnani 07:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: It appears that in the photo at top right, there is no membrane on this instrument.  There probably should be (or at least a piece of tape), because this instrument, as it is, won't make any sound at all.  Badagnani 20:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  The dimo should be placed on the second hole from the wider circumferenced end of the dizi.  (Obsessions28 (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membrane 

message: Can someone add Chinese characters and pinyin for bangdi, qudi, and hengdi?  Badagnani 04:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think I got it now, correct me if I'm wrong. --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 19:38, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese characters 

message: I've created user templates for dizi players to use on their userpages here: :Category:Wikipedian dizi players. --Charlie Huang 【正矗昊】 12:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: User templates for dizi players

message: Individuality and Political Discourse in Solo "Dizi" Compositions 
Frederick Lau
Asian Music, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Autumn, 1995 - Winter, 1996), pp. 133-152
Forever Red: The Invention of Solo dizi Music in Post-1949 China 
Frederick Lau
British Journal of Ethnomusicology, Vol. 5, 1996 (1996), pp. 113-131
LDHan 19:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some potential reference material

message: Should the alternate name 侗笛 be added? Badagnani 00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  侗笛 

message: I found some opinions about the origin of  dizi are incorrect.Such like .the history of the   ancient dizi which was found in jiahu site(also could be called jiahu gu di) could date back BC6000.Sois about 8 000years ago.not 9 000 years ago.
And there's no reference indicate dizi was imported in Han dynasty so far.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luyan1985 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The origin of dizi 

message: I removed the fingering chart and merged the "Playing techniques" and "Playing Styles" sections into once section. The fingering chart felt unnecessary to me, since most other woodwind pages, save for the bassoon page, don't go much in depth about fingering. It seems extraneous to go in depth into basic playing technique as the related articles pertaining to transverse flutes and flutes cover this in greater depth. Please revert or discuss if there is controversy. Fffffgggg54 (talk) 18:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fingering chart removal