Talk:Billy Mackenzie

message: :Image:Billymckenzie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Billymckenzie.jpg

message: I would suggest taking out the sentence about The Smiths song "William it was really nothing" being about Mackenzie. I'm pretty sure that was just speculation and it's not cited. 60.240.75.73 (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "William it was really nothing" 

message: I believe MacKenzie is correct - this is how his name appears all the way through Tom Doyle's biography The Glamour Chase, and in the Guardian article referenced here. Both tribute sites created by fans also use MacKenzie, as does The Guinness encyclopedia of popular music.--Michig (talk) 05:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Independent article I added as a source used "Mackenzie", and so did the others I looked at for sourcing that item. Having said that, I can see that other sources do use "MacKenzie". I don't claim to have any personal knowledge of which is right, so I won't object if other editors prefer "MacKenzie" - but before my most recent edit, the article used both spellings indiscriminately. It needs to at least be consistent. — Gavia immer (talk) 06:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MacKenzie/Mackenzie 

message: dmode (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Most if not all of the music on that site is subject to copyright and is likely used illegally there. External links should provide quality information that goes beyond what can be incorporated in the article. --Michig (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

text: This is an encyclopedia article. An external link to a dubious playlist someone put together simply isn't appropriate. --Michig (talk) 07:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

text: I don't see any copyright information on the wave.cat site. It is not acceptable to link to sites that contain or may contain copyright-infringing material. And again, someone's personal playlist of Billy Mackenzie-related tracks is not suitable for an external link. --Michig (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

text: Youtube has done a deal to pay royalties for copyright material. Does wave.cat pay such royalties? You don't seem to wish to address the issue that this is a fan-compiled playlist, just like many others that exist on sites such as Youtube. If there was an official Youtube or Vevo channel to link to then that would possibly be a worthwhile external link, but linking to fan-made playlists simply isn't appropriate. Do you have an association with this site or the user that compiled the playlist? I'm struggling to understand why you feel a user-compiled playlist is a suitable external link for an encyclopedia article. --Michig (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading this discussion it seems to me that the reason being given for including this playlist is to promote the music of the artist and to generate royalties from the playing of the music.  Wikipedia is absolutely not supposed to promote anything or anyone.  Also, the site being linked to is running Disqus; it's enlightening to read its Wikipedia page.  If there is a consensus among the editors here that a link directing the reader to Youtube material about Billy Mackenzie is desirable, this link would do this directly, and the choice and order of the videos presented would not be filtered through the opinion of a third party.—Anne Delong (talk) 02:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Inclusion of a fan sourced playlist of Billy Mackensie's work linked to a second skin music steam system enriches Wikipedia's digital vellum. Please see following discussion / dispute

message: I've just watched a documentary about Billy, and Billy's father tells of finding Billy after his suicide. It was not in a garden shed, but in the dog kennel in the garden of a bungalow that Billy owned at Auchterhouse (he owned the main house as well). So not a garden shed, and not his Dad's house. I'm not sure if I'm allowed to link, but the video is under the title 'The Associates - Documentary 2000 HD', at www.youtube.com/watch?v=riop6MNVoqA. The subtitles don't do well with Billy's Dad's Scottish accent. Timestamps 16:05 (house and bungalow); 20:57 (suicide). Stronach (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death