lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cray J90

message: According to this mailing list posting, the IOS-V IOP processors were SPARCs (MicroSPARCs?) on VME64 boards made by Themis. The earlier Y-MP EL/EL90 series had the 68k-based IOS. Letdorf 12:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Above link is now dead; try this one instead. Letdorf (talk) 13:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IOS-V processors
Talk:Dardanelles operation

message: The flag-captain in HMS Canopus is given as "F.W. Austin". I suspect this is intended to be Francis William Austen, who had commanded Canopus at the Battle of San Domingo the previous year, but this site says Austen had been succeeded by Thomas George Shortland in June 1806; Shortland left in September 1807 and was succeeded by Charles Inglis in 1808. Opera hat (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "F.W. Austin"
Talk:Ahmed Kamal (Egyptologist)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject 
Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.--KGV  (Talk) 05:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Invalid title, correct Ahmed Kamal (egyptologist)--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid title
Talk:Oregon Files

message: It has come to my attention through research on the topic that the list of characters was identical to one on http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/The_Oregon_Files before I edited and added to it. Gloryify (talk) 10:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The website mentions the source of its information as Wikipedia. 069952497a (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Characters 

message: Hi, I wanted to put a list of the villains from the series but I haven't finished yet an aslo wanted some feedback on some of the content. If you have anything to add or a comment to make please feel free but please leave while I finish it off. Thanks Gloryify (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on that. However, I'm focusing more on individuals right now. 069952497a (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on 

message: *China (Golden Buddha)
* (Sacred Stone)
* (Dark Watch)
*Congolese Army of Revolution (Skeleton Coast)
*The Responsivists (Plague Ship)
* (Corsair)
Moving my work to my talk page because there is more I want to work on. Thanks Gloryify (talk) 02:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on that. However, I'm focusing more on individuals right now. 069952497a (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Antagonists 

message: Wasn't there going to be a TV show/move based off this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErichSturmovik (talk • contribs) 21:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Show 

message: Co-author is an important role ;-)
This article must identify the co-author for each book, maybe at once if there was a simple succession.
It ought to explain the change(s), if there is any reliable source that gives a reason. Perhaps a book review, acknowledgment, afterword, etc, for the first Jack Du Brul volume. --P64 (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-authors 

message: Each book in this series should have an article of its own. At one point the individual books started to be mentioned only via redirect files. Other book series have articles for each book in the series and the books of this series should be treated no differently. Bill Pollard (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There should be articles for each book in this series
Talk:The Hugo Winners

message: I propose merging The Hugo Winners Volume Two into this article, and making this an article about the entire series. All five volumes are already listed, and a single book in the series (even the first book) doesn't seem notable enough to warrant an article. Making this article about the series would also be consistent with the article on The New Hugo Winners. The article is still small enough to easily support this change. DOSGuy (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:St Philip and St Jacob, Bristol

message: The church website, and indeed the text of the Wikipedia article, call the church SS Philip and Jacob, Bristol not St Philip and Jacob, Bristol. Since the formal name of the church is St Philip and St Jacob with Emmanuel the Unity, the use of SS (the plural abbreviation of 'Saints') is appropriate. I'll move the article shortly if there are no objections. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to SS Philip and Jacob, Bristol 
Talk:List of places in Greater Manchester

message: We need defined inclusion criteria. Edits such as  and  are adding a number of somewhat minor areas to the list. Where will it end? To Bolton, I could add Breightmet, Burnden, Daubhill, Deane, Doffcocker, Gilnow, Great Lever, Haulgh, Heaton, Mill Hill, Rose Hill, Springfield, Tonge Fold, Tonge Moor, Victory and innumerable other names found only on bus timetables or in historical documents; but I won't. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest settlements with a discernible town centre or notable civic building(s).  So Radcliffe, Greater Manchester is fine but Stoneclough is not. Parrot of Doom 21:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's much argument over your first example, but the second (Manchester) is more problematic.  Why, for example, should Blackley be included, but neither Gorton nor Levenshulme?  The last two were independent towns (urban districts) prior to incorporation into the city, and are just as relevant as Blackley (which was a civil parish).  Skinsmoke (talk) 03:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria
Talk:Sugarman syndrome

message: I think this should under the one article on OFDs as type is the most common, but still rare. I also see that there is an existing page at wikibooks Handbook of Genetic Counseling/Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome, which would provide a good template for such an article. David Ruben  Talk  12:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Battle of Imbros (1717)

message: This article is clearly self-contradictory, about whether it was fairly indecisive or a decisive Ottoman victory. PatGallacher (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with PatGallacher, and checked the history of the infobox. It was changed by an unidentified user 70.78.218.193, who vandalised the article. I reverted his changes.(Filiep (talk) 16:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikipediaWeekly/Episode17

message: Could you talk about the main page on april fool's? The Placebo Effect 13:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, i kinda feel my little George Washington (inventor) article got short shrift in the podcast as lacking due humor.  Did you read comments like Talk:April_1%2C_2007#It.27s_a_funny_gag.2C_but_don.27t_extend_it_to_here or Talk:Bat_bomb#April_Fools_Day_FA.3F or at least half of Talk:George Washington (inventor) (oh, and at some point, people even removed some others' comments to avoid their supposed embarrassment).  A very large number of people were indeed quite successfully fooled into believing this true article was a hoax, and found this slightly boring man's life quite hilarious.--Pharos 08:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: April Fool's?
Talk:Kansas's 3rd congressional district

message: I added the information about current nominees in the top paragraph. I believe that the "current candidates" section should be removed. This is information that typically belongs on the pages about the 2010 congressional races. I've only seen a few of the 435 Congressional districts that have this type of section. I don't believe we should get into all the candidates who ever run for a race because it would bog down these district pages over the years. I never even add the candidates campaign website links on these district breakdown pages because, again, that belongs on the pages dealing with races.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.242.236.242 (talk) 02:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CURRENT CANDIDATES 
Talk:Architecture of Rajasthan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Why is temple architecture is placed under History section? While every other architecture like forts and palaces are under separate para Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Johnbod can it be improved? Or is it alright. Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Also cenotaph is under fort and palace category. Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The most famous and most-visited historic architecture of Rajasthan, by far, is the later Rajput forts, palaces, and to a lesser extent the cenotaphs.  I imagine this is what most readers are most interested in. So in this case I thought it better to have these together in a section at the top, and then have the usual chronological run-through of other periods. What the article most needs now, I think, is a section on havelis.  Johnbod (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is temple architecture is placed under History section? 

message: Both articles have the same topic and the same main source, Michell Vexations (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Rajput architecture]] into [[Architecture of Rajasthan]]
Talk:Kansas's 2nd congressional district

message: Shouldn't this article be Kansas' 2nd congressional district? Ohconfucius (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Chhajja

message: I had forgotten to mention in the previous heading, but I have also removed the stub designation at the bottom of the article as I saw fit.
Thanks
Theodorejordan10 (talk) 01:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Stub Designation 

message: Hello all.
I've attempted to construct an article that will be more than just a stub and will try to expand it to a satisfactory degree.
The prior stub class article was a couple of lines long with no citations and a single external link.
I've attempted to create a more extensive article for which all sections are cited from academic sources.
Hopefully we can make the article even more extensive. I will also attempt to add more in the coming days.
Theodorejordan10 (talk) 01:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Rewritten 
Talk:Choultry

message: Johnbod: I am puzzled by you adding what reads like unsourced blog-like personal commentaries with no source, while removing well-sourced content. Would you please explain? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You need (here and to some extent in general) to be clear about the difference between information that can be referenced and information that is useful and encyclopedic.  What use (ignoring the grammar) is "A choultry is sometimes called mandapa" to anyone, especially given the article already contained "Many major temples have mandapam and pillared halls, some called Thousand pillared halls with an attached kitchen for servicing pilgrims and travelers to the temple, and these are also called choultry." Just because something is a) not added by you, and b) unreferenced, does not make it "unsourced blog-like personal commentaries".  Equally, just because something is a) added by you, and b) referenced, does not make it useful, or the last word on the subject, as you often seem to think. Johnbod (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  See the two links I gave above. If you want to share "useful information" without citing any sources, it comes across as your personal POV. That is a blog. It encourages others to add OR, without sources. You added the "mandapa" part here. I tried to keep something by adding a source. Mandapa and mandapam and thousand pillared halls may all sound same to you, but it may not be obvious to someone new to the field. Neither you, nor I (nor anyone) else determines the last word... the mainstream reliable scholarly sources and the content guidelines determine that. Please try to cite a source for whatever you add. It will help us collaborate better in this and other articles. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mandapa

message: I am a native speaker of the Malayalam language and can confirm that the word 'chavadi' does not exist in our language. The words for a temple caravanserai in Malayalam are vaziambalam and satram; the former has a Dravidian root (literally, way-house) and the latter is from Sanskrit. Indielov (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malayalam
Talk:Mandapa

message: Please justify the recent name change based on the naming conventions. Thanks - Taxman Talk 02:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: The Padmanabhaswamy Temple article mentions that it has an ottakkal mandapam. Is this something that would belong in the "Name variations" section of the mandapa article? If so, then what does the word "ottakkal" mean? I've only found it as the name of a town in Kerala about 73km from Trivandrum. --Marc Kupper|talk 20:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ottakkal mandapa 
Talk:Salabhanjika

message: The origin of these Deities are understandable and relatable, One thing that interests me and make one curious is that who are the artists who had portrayed these deities in physical forms. What is their intuition behind it and how they brought these conceptions into reality. I have tried to find out who the artists could be behind the portrayal of these statues but was unable to do so. My assumption behind the lack of the artists’ name could be the sacredness of these deities, and the contributors might not want their name to be made public. Any further information would be very helpful. 120.21.165.231 (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the Artists
Talk:Kirtimukha

message: Kirthimukha and kīrttimukha are both misspellings, but there is a difference. kīrttimukha is a misspelling within Sanskrit tradition, actually mentioned by MW, while Kirthimukha is just modern cluelessness. 
Based on its incidence in a google count (about 10% on the web and about 6% on google books), I think Kirthimukha is probably not worth mentioning as  a "common misspelling".  --dab (𒁳) 13:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves

message: The file Udayagiri1.jpg is watermarked. So as per the principles of wikipedia to discourage the use of watermakered image I have replaced that photo with File:Udayagiri caves from Khandagiri hill.jpg Balaji (talk) 07:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File replaced

message: Is the section on inscriptions necessary in this article? I don't think it is. Rahul Jain (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section on ''inscriptions'' 

message: There is already an article named Udayagiri Caves, this article replicates the content. This article may be renamed to Khandagiri caves and contain only info about that. --Ravichandra (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Udayagiri Caves is an entirely different article, and refers to a cave complex in Madhya Pradesh.पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 18:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I was mistaken by seeing the names. Thanks for the clarification. --Ravichandra (talk) 05:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing article for Udayagiri caves 

message: Udaygiri and khandagiri are related to jainism 2409:4042:2D8C:997C:0:0:5E8B:E60E (talk) 03:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Udaygiri and khandagiri are of jainism in Orisha India or
Talk:Shawnee Mission, Kansas

message: It seems like when I was a kid, it was often hyphenated as such: Shawnee-Mission.
The naming could be for the Shawnee Indian Mission, the two major cities Shawnee and Mission, or even the Shawnee Mission School District (which I believe came before the postal district).
All I know is that when you ask people where they are from, some answer "Shawnee Mission". I think that is a woefully incorrect answer, since there is no such city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.70.156.3 (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name Shawnee Mission
Talk:Reira Serizawa

message: "When Takumi became linked with Hachi, Layla ran out of the recording room throwing a fit ."
This is inaccurate. She actually left very quietly. It took several minutes for anyone to notice she was missing.
- The major editing I did here, specifically the character section, stems from the special manga chapter Takumi's Story. In case anyone thought I was making it up. Daisy 03:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:De Soto, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 23:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: Check this edit. HenkvD 18:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . I restored older text.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 23:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check this edit 
Talk:Fairway, Kansas

message: seriously? lol 76.92.148.254 (talk) 03:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed. Grey Wanderer (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Library Bit 
Talk:Mission Hills, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Mission Woods, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Edgerton, Kansas

message: If you would like to edit this article, please review the following to get a better idea of what to include:
# All city articles MUST follow this guideline for layout and content: Wikipedia:USCITY
# Please examine these city examples: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania; Stephens City, Virginia; Kent, Ohio; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please do NOT add text that sounds like a realtor advertisement, but instead write like a neutral-party encyclopedia.
# Please read the  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. 
# How to cite sources by adding references? Add references or someone may delete your text.
# What is Verifiability?
Sbmeirow (talk) 08:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Westwood Hills, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  06:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 

message: I moved the HISTORY section to here because of the lack of references.  You are more than welcome to add any part of this back, as long as their is a citation reference on each paragraph that allows people to verify the statement is true.  • Sbmeirow • Talk •  06:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Countryside, Kansas

message: There is a remark that the 2000 census provides "bizarre and obviously incorrect" demographics. I don't think it's obvious. Does anyone see what is bizarre?
Pollifax (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census comment 
Talk:Paola, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article
Talk:Osawatomie, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  00:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article