Talk:American Medical Response

message: Comments that are libelous and unsubstantiated, or where the sources aren't valid should not be posted on this AMR wikipedia page.  Please do not post anymore libelous, opinionated information on this business' page.
LMTabone (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libelous Comments 

message: Numerous sources have been added to the American Medical Response article to add credibility to the facts mentioned.  Some of the claims that have been made against AMR are outdated, from 2005, or unsubstantiated and based on an editor's or writer's opinion, not on the facts.--LMTabone (talk) 19:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and Credibility 

message: Removed the sentence "American Medical Response also has to date a 97% employee turnover rate." The claim was unsubstantiated, and appears to be wholly untrue as well. I also removed the line, "American Medical Response is also known for long response times, such as in Riverside County, California." It is un-sourced. And even if it were true, I am not sure I understand why a problem such as this in one small county should be included in an article about national company. Is a disgruntled former employee contributing this stuff to the article? - Big Brother 1984 18:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnover Rate 

message: What year did they aquire HealthTek? What year was AMR aquired by Laidlaw? When did Laidlaw sell them?
"In 1996 Laidlaw acquired AMR for $2.2 billion."  In February 2005, AMR and EmCare were sold, and a new company was formed to become the leading provider of emergency medical services in the United States, Emergency Medical Services Corporation.(1)
(1) Information pulled from: http://www.answers.com/topic/laidlaw-international-inc-usa  and http://www.emsc.net/About-EMSC.aspx  LMTabone (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Healthtek, Laidlaw etc. 

message: It is a well known fact in the EMS industry that American Medical Response does not care for patients with HIV/AIDS or Cancer. Their managemental staff have been recorded as to saying that it's cheaper to risk not reporting the physical, accidental droppings of Cancer patient, as long as they are doped up on heavy pain medication then to have to payout a malpractice lawsuit to the family when the patient dies.
I don't think this comment should be on the page.  This seems very biased and definitely not NPOV.  There are also no facts to substantiate this claim.Kbnha goddess 04:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AIDS and Cancer patients 

message: That section ain't neutral, someone should fix it... Maybe I will... Smiles, Nate1028 (talk) 21:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that it's false, it's that it's of questionable relevance. How about instead adding some more relevant and less promotional information, like the history of the company?—Chowbok ☠ 07:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the Neutral Point of View??? 

message: These services appear to be more than just ambulances.  I've seen them restarting cars and helping to pull the out of barriers. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  You might note that AMR provides services at IndyCar and other races in the US