Talk:Muslim Association of Sweden

message: *"Muslimsk kritik mot krav på egna lagar" - Muslim critic against demand on own laws
*"Gårdagens krav på särskilda lagar för Sveriges muslimer får kritik från andra muslimska organisationer."  - Yesterdays demand on special laws for Swedish Muslims receives critic from other Muslim organizations
If i don't recall wrong, they even distanced themselves from the demand, and it is possible that some asked if the guy acted on his own behalv.... dont remeber. Slopy research, you shoul have contacted somebody that at least can read the sources posted on this article. --Striver 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That concurring Muslim orgs claim to not support the demands, and that according to some wikipedians shaky and unsourced recollection, unnamed others -possibly- distanced themselves from it, neither detracts the factuality of the demands, nor the fact that they had been issued by the MAoS. --tickle me 20:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: Section must be splited out, it gets way to much undue weight on a stub article.--Striver 00:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Please explain decisions to include details on Aldebe's "open letter" here. cheers, Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huldra: yes, I saw your note on the Wikilobby Arbcom case; I've asked User:Tickle me to say here why he restored the material someone else had deleted. I think it should remain deleted. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think we possibly could have one sentence on it, making it very clear that this was one man´s opinion, and that the other Muslim representatives were against him. Also, googeling for them it seems as if they have had opinions about the latest cartoon controversy; that should probably go into the article, too. Regards, Huldra (talk) 22:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To stubbify, or not to stubbify 

message: If no one has anything to add about this organization, then I intend to pare down the "controversy" section significantly.  As the article stands, the "controversy" overwhelms the article.  Perhaps this incident can be discussed more on the article about Aldebe - but it doesn't really deserve this much emphasis here, especially given that it originated with Aldebe and was rejected by the membership.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversy" violates wp:undue 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Muslim Association of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060505214109/http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=3688&date=20060429 to http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=3688&date=20060429
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070102171533/http://sydsvenskan.se/malmo/article156076.ece to http://sydsvenskan.se/malmo/article156076.ece
*Added  tag to http://svt.se/content/1/c6/58/17/97/Brev%20fr%E5n%20Sveriges%20Muslimska%20F%F6rbund.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified