Talk:San Diego Convention Center

message: I may not have done the most justice to the spirit of the description of the Sails Pavilion, but factually it needed to be changed.  The roof of the Sails Pavilion has no glass whatsoever, and is not supported by "sail-like structures."  Rather, the roof IS a sail-like structure, made of Teflon-coated fiberglass and supported by metal columns and steel cables.  One end of the hall has a wall abutting the new extension that is entirely glass, and was put in place due to noise complaints from nearby residents as the Pavilion is often used to host concerts in conjunction with conventions.  The roof is very similar in design, structure, and appearence to that of the Denver International Airport. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.119.44.180 (talk) 15:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the Sails Pavilion description 

message: IIRC, the center was destroyed in a one shot comic about the popular comic character Lobo. A 'Dark Horse' comic book 'Hero Zero' had a giant fall on the center, killing many. I think these are noteable enough to be mentioned with the right sourcing. Lots42 (talk) 19:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic books 

message: No information on capacity (the number of people that can be there at one time)? — al-Shimoni (talk) 11:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There are individual capacity charts for different parts of the convention center here (primary source) and here (primary source), this non-reliable source says that maximum seating is 48,910. That being said there are no non-primary sources that give a single number.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity 

message: We currently have a separate article for the San Diego Convention Center Corporation. That article is an unsourced stub and has been for more than 10 years. What little information it contains, could easily be fitted into this parent article. I proposed that the Corporation article be merged/redirected into this Convention Center article. --MelanieN (talk) 15:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not oppose this suggestion by .--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Also agree. It looks like it's had some legal troubles (WashPo noted and others) in the last few years, but I don't think that will make it too long for the main SDCC article.  Worst case, it can always be separated out again.  Ten years is a long time without any TLC to justify its existence. Alaynestone (talk) 03:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am carrying out the merge. --MelanieN (talk) 15:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Someone in good faith has been adding dozens of links to a "further reading" section in this article. It got completely out of hand. That kind of section is appropriate for listing one or two sources that give added depth to the subject beyond what is in the article. It is not a place to list dozens of articles just because they are about the subject, or "potential sources" which should instead be evaluated and (if found valuable and not duplicative of existing references) added to the article. The vast majority of articles do not include a "Further reading" section. See WP:Further reading. 
I am reproducing the list below. If some of these have pertinent information which is not already included or referenced in the article, they should be added, as text-cited references. If they are duplicates of what is already in the article and referenced, there is no need for them. --MelanieN (talk) 19:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: turns out this was a temporary addition, intended to help new editors at an edit-a-thon this weekend. So I am moving them back to the article for now. --MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Further reading" 

message: Sources that could be used to improve the article are:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
The offline sources are readily available through Resource Request. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Where WP:OFFLINE does abide, perhaps it is possible to contact the San Diego Historical Society Research Library to see if they have those items in their collection.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on San Diego Convention Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.sdccc.org/aboutus/history.cfm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6673130.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012042708/http://www.portofsandiego.org/convention-center-expansion-project/ to http://www.portofsandiego.org/convention-center-expansion-project
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—14.192.212.235 (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't explained what you think is erroneous, and the coordinates in the article appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, please give a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 14:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate errorb 

message: *Voice of San Diego
*KPBS
*KNSD
--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 07:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifth Avenue Landing sources