Talk:Anand Jon

message: Eh, this page is protected so someone who can should fix the spelling of 'incarcerated' in the box on the right side of the page, as well as the bare urls in the references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aindriahhn (talk • contribs) 22:14, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling Error and bare urls

message: The previous content of this page was unsourced puffery, and most if not all of the deleted material came from the designer's own website or from another fashion site.  Content cannot be copied; it must be sourced from reliable sources, and worded in a neutral point of view.  The effect of the deletions is of course to severly truncate the article, and emphasize the individual's legal difficulties rather than his career.  That can be avoided by adding objectively-written content which does not violate copyright.  Kablammo 18:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would have been preferable to rewrite the section using the designer's website as a source instead of leaving this article for 9 months as a BLP-violating mess. Please work slower and better in the future. Phil Sandifer (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: I am unsure as to if Anand Jon should be listed in Category:American rapists, Category:American sex offenders and/or Category: Convicted American child molesters.  In References 3 and 4 he is described as convicted of Sexual Assault and Rape respectively, although in the actual articles it says "Sexual Assault".  Additionally the victims were under 18, so is that child molestation.  For right now he is listed in Category:American sex offenders as Rape and child molestation do fall under Sex offences. I would appreciate some input.  ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 15:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong. Child molestation is not statutory rape (which in California would refer to victims under 18, but under 17 in most of the USA.) In California, child molestation refers to victims under 14. Anand Jon is certainly a convicted rapist and sex criminal and no one is claiming he is an innocent victim who was entrapped, but not a child molester. Not everyone who is a very bad person, not even if they're a very bad person who commits sex crimes,is a child molester.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.229.96.226 (talk) 05:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Anand Jon was born in the year 1973, not in 1976 as specified. He is a convicted rapist in the USA.
He is the nephew of KJYesudas [] a very famous Keralite carnatic singer. This article in [Times of India] is of a co-student who studied with him in Loyola college.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.146.239 (talk) 11:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian connections  

message: All court records, criminal charges, and media reports use his legal name, Anand Jon Alexander. Arguably, the article should be under that name and his abbreviated name, Anand Jon, should redirect to his legal name. Blue Sheepdog (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Given the charges of juror misconduct and juror tampering which significantly delayed sentencing, arguably the article should include some mention of that. I think I'll add a sentence now. Blue Sheepdog (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Juror misconduct delay

message: The statement "As a result, Jon would not be eligible for parole until the year 2075, when he would be 67 years old" is incorrect. If Anand Jon was born in 1973, he would be 102 years old by then.
Ananad jon will be eleigible for parole in 2075, and that is correct too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.237.94 (talk) 15:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The age at the time of parole is incorrect 

message: Please change "Jon was born in Kerala, India to Jon was born in Nagerkovil, Tamil Nadu" 
122.167.87.247 (talk) 14:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. CTJF83 15:53, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 20 November 2011 

message: indicted is the correct spelling not indited
192.188.160.89 (talk) 02:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for pointing it out--Jac16888 Talk 02:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 27 January 2012 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Anand Jon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150709045054/http://www.nytimes.com:80/aponline/2009/08/31/us/AP-US-Fashion-Designer.html to http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/08/31/us/AP-US-Fashion-Designer.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anand Jon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130409223044/http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cgi/prosoma.dll?searchby=offender&id=18609292N2416 to http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cgi/prosoma.dll?searchby=offender&id=18609292N2416
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article, particularly the edits made by Sethbaby123, pretty clearly present a strong point of view in favour of the convicted. It's hard not to look at the way this page has been edited back to normal several times in the past (going back to 2007) and then re-edited with dubious sources and not wonder if the same people are placing undue weight on the reporting of claims and repeating that as accepted truth. Exclasen (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues