lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pregnane X receptor

message: "Download as PDF" totally screws up the references in the main section.
    69.72.27.20 (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  pdf version 

message: The bottom of page links to other 'Xenobiotic-sensing receptor modulators' lists many uncited compounds. Are these actually ligands?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brompton cocktail (talk • contribs) 23:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenobiotic-sensing receptor modulators
Talk:Retinoid X receptor

message: From my college Biology class, I've been given a good research paper that can be used to expand this stub.
Overview of Retinoid Metabolism and Function
Rune Blomhoff, Heidi Kiil Blomhoff
Department of Nutrition,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Department of Medical  Biochemistry, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,
UniversityofOslo, Oslo, Norway
Received 2 October 2005;accepted 11 October 2005 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VashTexan (talk • contribs) 19:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Paper to expand this stub
Talk:Canal Street station (LIRR)

message: There's also a Canal Street listed on 1853 schedules:  but this might be the Canal Street that is now 89th Street. --NE2 03:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mechanoreceptor

message: Shouldn't the pragraph talking about "somatosensory transduction" actually refer to the "projection pathway" for mechanoreceptors? AFAIK "transduction" refers just to the transmission of the signal from the receptor cell to the CNS.  (see the transduction (physiology) article). Master gopher (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to my AP textbook, this is not true: "In primates, Ruffini corpuscles are only found in fingernail beds, and then only rarely." Nothing I Googled agreed with this statement at all. And the Wiki article on RCs contradicts it as well. 66.26.95.207 (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruffini corpuscles 

message: This article seems a bit human-centered, should there be a new article about general mechanoreceptors, or should this article be re-written for other animals in mind?  i.e., Johnston's organ & Mechanosensory...  Rhetth (talk) 22:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My generalization segment below might address this. 137.124.161.31 (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  anthropocentric? 

message: There is an article on Electroreception that discusses "electroreceptor(s)" as a sub-topic. Perhaps this article should be renamed to Mechanoreception and then "mechanoreceptor(s)" can be discussed as a sub-topic. 137.124.161.31 (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalize [[Mechanoreceptor]] to Mechanoreception 

message: Should we combine this article with Cutaneous receptor? --Waqqashanafi (talk) 03:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine this article with Cutaneous receptor?
Talk:Nociceptor

message: There is a discussion at Talk:Pain and nociception about splitting that article into two.  Any interested editors are welcome.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nociception is being redirected here. Either a section on the consequences/outcomes of nociception will need to be added here or another article made for nociception. SmithBlue (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nociception redirecting here

message: :The decision was to split pain and nociception so now there _is_ a separate article LeeVJ (talk) 20:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Nociception]] now a seperate article

message: Chemical gated ion channels are touched on here, but I think voltage gated ion channels are missing from this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.36.53.72 (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Voltage gated ion channels

message: Are both 'c's soft?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.84.173 (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:Bangor Erris

message: There is a disagreement about population.  Possibly it has grown from 266 in 2002 to 500 today. Biscuittin (talk) 22:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 
Talk:Jane Eyre (character)

message: This page isn't about the character AT ALL. It provides even less information about Jane's personality and history than does the main page about the novel. This page should be deleted if no-one is able to offer at least cursory coverage of the purported topic of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:6:4D00:2CE:C812:3B05:B310:E4C7 (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It looks like Bertha Mason's insanity is genetic, but is this a possible case for Huntington's disease or some other disorder? Perhaps, a late on-set schizophrenia that runs in the family? 128.146.43.113 (talk) 15:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mental illness or possible case for Huntington's disease? 

message: Flagged Plot arc section to suggest rewriting to address tone, as current content would benefit from being more formal, clear, and detached. CactusPlum (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot arc Tone flag

message: — Assignment last updated by RAT1981 (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1
Talk:P2X purinoreceptor

message: Subcellular (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given there are now pages for each receptor subunit, the gene infoboxes area little redundent here aren't they?  This page should not contain such specific information, which should only be on the specific gene pages.  For example like nAChRs WW9066 (talk) 21:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I agree that including 7 protein boxes in one article was a little excessive.  I have removed the protein boxes, but have converted the receptor subtype list into a table so that at least the chromosomal location of each of the receptors gene is retained.  I hope that this is an improvement.  Boghog2 (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that, I like the new table. I would have made the changes myself (I'm slowly getting the hang of editing pages myself) - though I probably wouldn't have such a good job. WW9066 (talk) 19:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

text: With very few exceptions, each gene and the corresponding protein encoded by that gene has one and only one WP article whose subject matter comprises both the gene and the protein.  The reason I included both the P2X receptor and corresponding HUGO gene name in the table was primarily to inform the reader that the names of the gene and protein differ slightly.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for additions and improvements

message: I've updated the page to take into account the recent publication of the P2X4 crystal structure, and added a couple of figures.
BTW, the IP address 165.134.61.45 in the History is all me (neglected to log in).
Subcellular 18:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work Subcellular.  The figures look great!  Boghog2 (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks. and thanks for posting the info box, i neglected to do that. At the moment, the pdb file only features a single subunit. when there's a full structure file, I'll tinker with it in Pymol and put up a better pic.Subcellular 20:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion regarding changes

message: Isn't this more commonly known as P2X6?  I know it doesn't form homomeric receptors, but within the field it's more commonly known as P2X6.  What is the consensus?WW9066 (talk) 21:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the official HUGO gene name was until recently P2XLR1 but has now changed to P2X6.  Therefore I have made the corresponding changes in the text of this article.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: P2XLR1?

message: Greetings!   I have reorganized the page so that it flows from more general to more specific.  In additon, I have expanded the information on this page to include more detailed information about the structure, channel opening, receptor synthesis, and receptor trafficking.  I also added multiple citations to substantiate claims already present on the page, besides adding some of my own. Bcaruso54 (talk) 22:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization!
Talk:Vasopressin receptor 1A

message: What has written in there is not how Arginine vasopressin receptor 1A influencing behaviour. It is more about the influence of AVPR1A physiological. An suggestion of the influence of AVPR1A on behaviour in Voles are fidelity and father absence. Okhovat et al. (2015) did a study in the AVPR1A gene of prairie voles which affects the activity of vasopressin receptor, and thus predicts less cheating on their partners and invest more in family and less chance of being an absent father.
This can be linked to the article page of Father absence.
Jackiechanyt (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prairie vs. montane voles under the role in behaviours part 

message: I redirected the above draft to this article, but others may want to check its page history to see if it contains anything useful to merge into this article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:AVPR1A: Associations With Musicality]]
Talk:Vasopressin receptor 2

message: I have moved the material inserted by User:151.200.170.251 from this article (which deals only with AVPR2) to the more general vasopressin receptor article (AVPR1A+AVPR1B,+AVPR2) where it more properly belongs.  Boghog2 17:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bradykinin receptor

message: What cell do you find B1 and B2? And what causes the receptor to be created de novo? (It can't be just bradykinin binding to its receptor since there is no receptor yet, right?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.198.18 (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to , B1 is primarily expressed in immune cells where as B2 is more widely distributed.  According to , NF-κB (a transcription factor involved in stress response), may up-regulate the expression of B1, so that if NF-κB is not activated, no B1 is expressed, but if NF-κB if activated, expression of B1 is increased. Boghog (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What cell is the receptor at?
Talk:Trace amine-associated receptor

message: It's probably worth using this review to add new content to phenethylamine, 3-iodothyronamine, trace amine, TAAR1, TAAR2, TAAR5, TAAR6, TAAR8, and this article. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: New review

message: do you think the content within and layout of this table is suitable for covering these receptors in the article? 
Also, do you think it's reasonable to just list "known/putative functions" and "known ligands" as well as explicitly state "other G protein coupling unknown" for these receptors when so few things are actually known about hTAAR2-hTAAR9? Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 22:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: E.g., this review lists "CNS and periphery unknown" under the associated putative functions column in table 1 for all of these receptors, except for TAAR1. Off-topic: I emailed Dr. Berry and he was kind enough to multi-license figure 2 from this review so that I could upload it to Commons and use it in TAAR1. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 22:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Hi Seppi333.  The lack knowledge about what these receptor subtypes do is of course a direct consequence of a lack of selective ligands to probe their function.  The way you have presented this in the table I think is fine.  The only suggestion I have is to make clear which of the functions are known and which are putative. Also I found the pink color for pseudogenes distracting and unnecessary.  It is clear enough from the text that these are pseudogenes. Boghog (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Removing the coloring is fine with me. Thanks for the feedback! Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 05:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Human trace amine-associated receptors]]
Talk:CREB

message: are there different human variations(haplotypes)of CREB, CREB has recently been published as being a large part of the longevity producing effect of calorie restriction.  Perhaps different human versions of CREB are linked to different human longevity patterns.
=== functionality of cre===
I removed the line regarding the increasing/decreasing the expression of CRE dependent genes.  CREB influences the transcription, but there are many, many downstream events involved in expression.Rambrown (talk) 22:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CREB haplotypes 

message: I removed the line regarding the increasing/decreasing the expression of CRE dependent genes.  CREB influences the transcription, but there are many, many downstream events involved in expression.Rambrown (talk) 22:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  functionality of cre
Talk:Big Brother (Bulgarian TV series)

message: Does anyone know the percentages for all the evictions in VIP Brother 2? Thanks. Worldofbb 19:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. Yes if you have the percentages for all the others that would be great. I can't find them anywhere. Worldofbb 11:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  VIP Brother 2 Evcition Percentages 

message: Hello, I've just created a seperate page proposing guidlines for noteability of Reality TV contestants and if they should have their own articles. I did this due to the mass number of articles being created and deleted on these subjects in recent months, and confusion among editors if they are in fact noteable or not. You can read this here. All edits and comments on the talk page are welcome. Thanks, Dalejenkins |  16:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reality TV star noteability guidelines

message: I have upgraded this article to C-Class as it meets the criteria, but to improve the article and help it achieve B-Class classification cleaning up the article may help. Please take a look at Big Brother (U.S.) as an example, it has general information relating to the American version and format differences with brief mentions of any seasons since that information is documented on respective season article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded to C-Class 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at  Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 23#Template:Big Brother sidebar .  Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 21:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[ Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 23#Template:Big Brother sidebar ]]
Talk:Catenin

message: I was initially taught to pronounce catenin as "cat'nin" just like the word adeno (as in adenocarcinoma) is pronounced "ad'no" not "ad-e-no" or "adeeno." You don't say "adeenocarcinoma" so you also don't say "beta cateenin." But it seems lots of people pronounce the e in this word (either short or long). This article did not help clarify this simple yet important point. Does anyone know the correct pronunciation? 162.82.215.197 (talk) 20:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: Is there a reason the types are not listed in alpha, beta, gamma, delta order?  Vokesk (talk) 21:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of types section
Talk:Grande Fratello

message: Aren't the "winners" and "presenters" lists under the first big table redundant? Nineko (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seasons
Talk:Henry B. Plant

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 04:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I have done a bunch of formatting, added metadata and an infobox as per the biography group's project page, and added a bunch of internal links.  DLPanther 18:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:WWF|Wikification wikiproject]] comment

message: I don't know what "claims" you're referring to in your edit summary. There's nothing controversial here. The IP editor seems to be pretty knowledgeable about Plant, and s/he mostly just expanded names, added wikilinks, and put in a few basic factiods that are likely already mentioned in existing citations. This article was pretty bad and hadn't been seriously edited in a looong time, so any decent additions by a new user should be welcomed, not reverted. And then we wonder why Wikipedia doesn't keep old editors or draw new ones like it used to...
Anyway, ol' Henry has been on my re-write list for years, and while I don't have time to overhaul the whole thing right now, I'll at least smooth out a few rough edges while I'm here. Zeng8r (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I'd except an edit summary something like, "New factoids added, which are still supported by existing references."    - FlightTime (open channel) 18:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  itchy trigger finger?
Talk:There There

message: There is absolutely no reason whatsoever that this article should be called "There there" instead of "There There". The discussion page for the original article indicated that the title violated Wikipedia naming conventions, and as such, I have changed it.
: Um let's see... I think I can think of a reason, maybe because that is the actual title of the song as written by the band? Kniesten (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 18:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: It certainly sounds like it. U-Mos (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paperbag Writer samples Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors? 

message: OK, I sense the song is a pun on the use of "there there" as a means to console someone. Does anybody know if this usage is of the same root as the regular meaning of there? Online dictionaries don't give this colloquial use that I can find, and therefore give no origin for it. Does anybody know if it is from a different rooted word? I'm assuming it is a Germanic rooted word regardless. 67.5.156.66 (talk) 09:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd always presumed it was a reference to Catch 22. Anyone read or hear anything to support this? --JoelBarnes (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "there there" the common colloquial usage. 

message: Switchfoot did an acoustic cover of this song, can't remember for which LP.
119.40.118.36 (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switchfoot cover
Talk:Big Brother (Norwegian and Swedish TV series)

message: Seperate articles need to be made for Norway season 1-3 and Sweden seasons 1-4 In23065 (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden and Norway 
Talk:Obiter dictum

message: From the article: "obiter dictum (plural obiter dicta, often referred to simply as dicta)"
Is it not often referred to simply as obiter? If you refer to "dicta" that seems to be the part of the case that ISN'T obiter, it's the obiter bit that means by the way while the dictum of a case is the ratio, the opposite.
::::No, the abbreviated term is "dicta", not "obiter." Famspear (talk) 01:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obiter 

message: Article places undue focus on SCOTUS. Obiter dictum has presence in other common law jurisdictions that aren't covered in as much detail. Dtlyng (talk) 12:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: A section that's been in this page since Nov 2006 is a word-for-word plagiarism from "Legal Writing by Design", full cite on the edited page. I fixed it to adequately credit the original work. Cchessman (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism in Significance Section

message: :
I'm guessing that Knuller in the last sentence ought to be Shaw. —Tamfang (talk) 04:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Shaw'' and ''Knuller'' 

message: The example given in the Carbolic Smoke Ball case is clearly covered by the substantive ruling "An offer can be made to al the world."  Moreover it is given as an example of something that leaves no doubt as to its persuasiveness, in comparison with the instant case.  As such I don't see it really qualifies in the useful sense as an example of an obiter - anyone accepting the ruling (and principle) in Carbolic  would have no need to refer to this text to confirm that an offer of a reward for a lost dog did not require aceptance.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 17:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dogs and balls
Talk:Big Brother Naija

message: Am Isaiah from Nigeria Big brother show is no more intersting since we cant watch the real page but the edit what could be the course for that it is beta the show is not available than watching the edit NOON SENCE
Well I thinks it's beta to watch the real page Prudencegloria (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prudence justin Prudencegloria (talk) 11:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prudence justin 

message: I think that someone should have been evicted on sunday Prudencegloria (talk) 11:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prudence j
Talk:NBA All-Star weekend

message: Was a 2ball competition held during the All-Star Weekend before? I think it is better to include all the events, like the 2ball competition, that had been held during the all-star weekend in the history. Nonetheless I can't find the relevant information on the internet. Can anyone help? Salt 03:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe we can have the MVP's of the game and stats and interesting things like person to have a triple double. Also we can have the attendance of each game with the smallest and largest attendance record.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KidClutch26 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things we can add
Talk:Brandywine Battlefield

message: I updated the NRHP infobox for the National Historic Landmark drive. User:Doncram had commented about having the battle infobox in the article, so I commented it out for now. What do others think - should it be in the battlefield article too, or just the battle article? Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 20:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I favor keeping the infobox on box articles as is. More would be redundant. Dincher (talk) 21:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle Infobox needed? 

message: On 4 March 2009, the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC) released a study of its 22 museums and historic sites, here: "Planning Our Future: Sustainability Committee Final Report". It recommended discontinuing operations at six of its sites, four of which are National Historic Landmarks. Proposed cuts to the PHMC budget mean these sites could close as early as July 1, 2009:
*Brandywine Battlefield (NHL)
*Bushy Run Battlefield (NHL)
*Conrad Weiser House (NHL)
*Fort Pitt Museum 
*Joseph Priestley House (NHL)
*US Brig Niagara (museum ship)
Contact information for the Governor and Director of the PHMC are here for anyone interested in commenting on the proposal. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 04:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed closure 
Talk:Arsenio Rodríguez

message: I've spent about 10 hours on this article so far. If you disagree with anything written in this article, please do not delete the text, but present the counter-view, supported by references (books, page numbers, quotes, etc). If you feel that something should be deleted please state your reasons here first. Thank you.Dr clave (talk) 07:11, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://lahorafaniatica.gladyspalmera.com/la-tumba-sin-lapida-requiem-por-arsenio-rodriguez/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.189.17.41 (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A.R. died 30.12.1970 