Talk:All That

message: Lyrics to copyrighted songs are copyright violations. --FuriousFreddy 22:53, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: I have renominated the article for FAC and archived the previous nomination. It looks like it has been cleaned up quite a bit and looks ready for FAC status. PF4Eva 23:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FAC: October 28, 2006

message: What would have to be done to the article to make it compliant without stripping it down to the bone or screwing it up royally? I think to help maintain the NPOV, any reference of the " Golden Age" of the show should be converted into references to the first generation of the show. However, you can still call them the old All That and the new All That. Does that sound good, or not? 68.97.47.88 21:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Noncompliant

message: As I mentioned on your talk page a while back, it is preferable to make one large edit than 20 minors in a row. CaptHayfever 16:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a courtesy to your fellow editors to keep the revision history easy to follow. (And on a side note, people can figure out that the "Cast members" section of an article about All That means "All That cast members") CaptHayfever 03:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TMC1982

message: To whomever added the POV tag, will you please explain you're reasoning behind this?  Many of the opinions about All That can be easily found in the external links section down below.  User:TMC1982
Until I get a proper explaination behind why the POV tag is there, I'm going to remove it.User:TMC1982
You're kidding, right? This article is a fanboy feeding frenzy. The explanations of the seasons after the "Golden Age" (A POV statement in itself) ended are just insult after insult. I'll admit that they were very, very bad, but the article offers almost no solid information about it other than your opinions. Just because you put "Most fans believe" or "Some think" before a statement, that doesn't mean it's automatically free from any criticism. I'm readding the tag.--Agent Aquamarine 05:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Tag

message: I'm the anon that added a cite needed tag to "All That is an" because I simply couldn't determine if it is running or not running. I just randomly came to this page, never having heard
of All That, and saw a contradiction with the "is" and the tense used later in the sentence, together with the cancellation section below. My guess would be that it is not running now, but maybe reruns are showing somewhere? Anyway I've since added two references, one to the imdb entry, another to the soundtrack listing. I've also commented out two inline links after the urban legend paragraph. I followed both links but they yield nothing resembling to citation. -213.219.161.27 00:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: is it running or not?

message: I changed "Schneider was supposedly absent from the 100th episode special while and Kopelow was supposedly absent from the 10th anniversery special." to "Schneider was supposedly absent from the 100th episode special, and Kopelow was supposedly absent from the 10th anniversery special." I think that makes more sense, but not sure it's what the original intentions were. Correct me if I'm wrong. Kushboy 05:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Sentence 

message: I have added other Nickelodeon spin-off shows to the "See also" section. Do you think this might be the time for a template? Please reply. - LBM 21:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template? 

message: Should the cast members be ordered by debut year as well as alphabetical?
:I would say keep it alphabetical on this page. For people who want to see a chronological order, List of All That characters is indexed that way, as well as the Wikiquote page. CaptHayfever 17:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast

message: This oath doesnt warrant its own article in my opinion.  Without evidence that the oath is in common use, it looks like the article fails WP:MEME.  Is it notable enough that it should be part of this article? Jayvdb 21:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You got me; I've never even heard of it. Sounds more like something from a sketch than an actual oath. CaptHayfever 00:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text: UPDATE - Actually, I checked the reference link on the oath article, and that's just some fansite club thing; it has no connection to the show whatsoever. Drop it like an anvil. CaptHayfever 03:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[The All That Oath]]

message: I just did a major update to get rid of all of the unverifiable claims, and kept the ones that can be varified. It might help to cite sources, but I'll do that later unless someone else does it.
:Very awesome, man. I've been wanting to clean this thing up for a while, but could never find enough time. Great work. CaptHayfever 04:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: I deleted the section on the return of Good Burger until further notice. That will help make the article a little bit shorter, and I wasn't sure how notable it was. I mean, if the recent discovery of the complete unused footage from  John Carpenter's Halloween isn't notable enough to be included in the Halloween (1978 film) article, then Good Burger's return probably isn't notable enough for this article. 68.97.47.88 21:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Return of Good Burger

message: I have reduced the references, removing the trivial ones that I could find and grouping redunant ones. And whose idea was it to give the refs nasty names like "They just hired Spears because she was Britney's sister and she destroyed the show"? GAHHHHHHHH!!!! ~  Porphyric Hemophiliac § 05:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: And so, beaten, torn, and with many paper cuts...

message: I have revised the article quite a bit today, and I think it looks better than it did, but still needs some improvements, especially sourcing. I think I took care of NPOV issues pretty well. Let me know what you think here or by replying to the  All That peer review page. (Edit: I'm sorry, I forgot to sign my name.) PF4Eva 20:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: September 23, 2006 revision

message: How do we know Ashton Kutcher had any relation to All That?  I can't find the information anywhere else on the internet.
I have seen nearly every episode (and I have seen every single episode from 1994-2000, and Ashton Kutcher was never a castmember. I don't know where this information came from. It needs to be removed from this article until actually confirmed by a reliable source. PF4Eva 00:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference?

message: In my attempt to clean up this article, I have deleted as many unsourced statements as I could find, and even deleted a few sections/statements as per  WP:NOR. I will next incorporate the trvia and lists into the article; adequately source statements; get rid of forum/fan sources unless reliable (example: the Lisa Foiles Yahoo! page announcing the cancellation); and formatting the article as per  WikiProject Television. I'm trying to get this up to GA status, and then if I play my cards right, FA status. It's about time this article gets what it deserves. PF4Eva 00:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major revision: October 31, 2006

message: Is there any info on the DVD releases on All that? "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 22:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD releases? 

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks... Copyright law is fairly sticky sometimes. ---J.S (t|c) 18:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: My first inclination is to fail this article for GA status, but in the interest of fairness (since the wait for a new review would be lengthy), I'm going to put this on hold for 7 days.  The following are my suggestions (some minor, some not-so-minor):
#Image layout - at least on my browser, some of the images are covering article text, particularly in the smaller sections.  Consider either changing the placement of some of the images, or simply removing some.  Frankly my suggestion would be the latter - this article isn't so large that the amount of images you have is necessary.
#Image captions - When including cast images, it's standard to identify everyone in the picture.  Since some of the images are so small, this may not be practical.  Therefore my suggestion is to choose one or two cast photos (preferably with the most well-known people) and caption those, then get rid of the others.
#Make sure every image used has a fair use rationale provided.  :Image:I37897777 99207.jpg could be problematic, as it appears to be a combination of screen shots and copyrighted publicity photos.
#See WP:MOS for the proper way to capitalize section headings.  
#Per WP:LEAD, your opening paragraphs should provide a concise summary of the article.  But the 3rd paragraph contains information on spinoffs that isn't referenced anywhere in the main article.  In addition, the lead makes no mention of the show's popularity or cultural impact.  It was on for 10 years, so I assume it was popular.  The lead also makes no mention of when the show was canceled.
#Reading the article, I got no sense of the actual style of the show, or of its sketches.  What kind of humor was it?  Was it all original material, or did they do some parodies?  Did the style of humor change over time?  Consider creating a "Format" section and including information about the opening, sketches, and musical acts.  Currently this information seems to be sprinkled throughout the article.
#Don't assume anyone reading the article is familiar with the most well-known sketches.  Good Burger is mentioned multiple times, but is never once described.  You don't have to go in-depth, but a few sentences would be helpful.  Similarly, there's an entire paragraph about the return of Vital Information, but it's not introduced anywhere else in the article.
#Move the soundtrack section near the bottom of the article.  The fact that it was released in 1996 doesn't mean it has to go in the middle of the article, as it interrupts the flow.
#Whenever possible, try to avoid single sentences standing on their own.  Try to incorporate them into other paragraphs.
Hope this helps.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 17:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article review 

message: I had to remove a few things that were taking up space, and this included things like unnecassary templates, large templates, long lists, etc. I think I have finally gotten this page up to FA status. Just wanted you to know why many things were deleted. Let's hope my nomination works for once. PF4Eva
*That was my complaint about the All That template, which was showing up on every page that remotely mentioned All That, but everyone else at the deletion discussion that I initiated said no, it's good to have everything on every page. Well, if it's good, then I figured I should go ahead and do the same myself, until everyone realized that it's not so good once you look at it.--Largo Plazo 04:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FAC: December 2006

message: Why are Zoey 101 and Just Jordan listed as All That spin-offs? They merely contain actors who appeared on All That before getting their own shows. Spin-offs imply the character leaves and gets their own show playing the same characters, which these two do not do. Zoey would have to have been a character on All That for it to properly qualify as a spin-off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.224.243.78 (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-offs 

message: I am trying to add info on season 6. Though it is still included in the source box, any info I add will not write to the page. It acts as if no info was written at all or like I wrote it with hidden tags. This Season 6 information is crucial to the article, and I can't even have it show up on the page, it skips parts, and the article really isn't that long. I don't know what to do. I'm trying for FA consideration, and information is getting cutt off inexplicably. Can somebody please help? Thanks. PF4Eva 23:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Info refusing to write to page

message: The lead section is not as bad as some I've been reading today.  I can see you're trying.  I don't think it's going to make it this time around though.  
*"The theme song for All That was performed by TLC."
:"The theme song for All That was performed by the American R&B group, TLC."
*"The show first aired on April 16, 1994 as a "special preview" and debuted as a regular series on December 24, 1994.[2] All That originally featured mainly young adults, but from Season 7 onward, it made a big switch to feature only preteens."
:Was there some reason for this big switch?
*"The show was very popular during its run.[3] In fact, some of the cast members got their own spin-off shows"
:Not particularly compelling prose, imo.  "The show maintained high popularity during its 7 years on Nickleodian" or whatever.  There's no problem with simple sentences, but these are almost sterile, they're so simple.  I will look over the whole article, and post my opinion.  However, as it has been under FAC a number of times without passing, if it doesn't pass this time, I will personally work with the editors to get it to FA quality--so stick with it.  This may take time, though.   KP Botany 00:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC 

message: I always thought the problem with this article was the treatment of each season as a separate article within the main article. I consolidated everything under broadcast history. Any thoughts? User:Aaronhumes--206.27.244.59 00:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring 

message: Recently, Lemon Demon has released a new song called Everyday French, using samples from All That; would it be good to mention the song? (MP3)
~~Neo 2.3 Hylan 22:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everyday French link? 

message: In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of 
December 6, 
2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR. 
Reasons for delisting (numbers refer to the relevant GA criteria)
*1. Well-written: Presumably due to its long tenure on Wikipedia and additions made since the original GA review, the article prose is patchy and would benefit from a copyedit in places. The Notable sketches... sections might be best split off into separate articles (or at least severely trimmed down). There are also a few minor WP:MoS issues.
*2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Since the article was assessed in 2006, GA criteria have been significantly altered; especially with regard to referencing requirements. Although All That is reasonably well-cited in parts, it also has quite a few large sections that are completely unreferenced (for example, Format, Notable sketches..., Temporary Cancellation etc.
*4. Neutral: There are a few sentences that come over as commentary (perhaps due to lack of sourcing), for example "the screen fades to black in a dramatic yet subtle ending to the 10 year tribute." If the show has been reviewed (which I'm guessing it must have been given the length of time it was running), a Criticism section may be a nice addition.
Given the amount of work required to bring this article up to current GA standards, I don't believe this can be achieved in the short term. Please feel free to leave any questions regarding this assessment on my talk page. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 22:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA sweep (delist) 

message: I am looking for the sketch You can't win, i can't remember it, but I think it is a game show with impossible tasks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tman7776 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   sketches are missing 

message: I would like to ask, what is going on with the syndication section of this article? With all due respect, it is turning into a mess, and does not cite any sources when it comes to the time that Seasons 1, 2, 6, and 7-10 will air and seems to change on a daily, or weekly, basis, and I simply request that people cite their sources when they edit because it has become very hard to read and confusing. Crockhun (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syndication Section 

message: Is this true? And is there a source(I know it says Dan Schneider himself confirmed it, but I'd like some type of link if this was confirmed in some type of online interview or anything)??? I'd just like to know where all of this is coming from or if this is nothing but something fanmade. Crockhun (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  11th Season? 

message: Is there an actual source on this because if there isnt, then its probably BS. I hope it is true because then i could see All That and Kenan and Kel when i get home from school. Please find a source for that alright.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.165.249.105 (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  shows coming on during the evening in September? 

message: Are these seasons (1,2,6,best of,7,8,9,10) actually coming soon, because they have just been playing the same season 3-5 episodes over and over again. does anyone have any proof that they are coming soon? Also, does anyone know why they dont play all of the season 3-5 episodes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.155.53 (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Seasons 

message: I just wrote an article on the 11th season to try and clear up the rumors. tell me if u think i went the wrong way about this. Also, the article is a bit sloppy so feel free to clean it up if i wasnt well written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.155.53 (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article (11th season) 

message: I know this question has more to do with The N but nobody there has responded. I just want to know if anyone has any information on if Dish Network will switch The N to a 24/7 channel. I am missing All That and Kenan and Kel and it is really frustrating. Please somebody give a response and some good info ASAP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.165.249.105 (talk) 01:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dish Network switch! 

message: Ok, Im thinking that the main page is getting WAY too big, so i think the series history eras must be sent to it's own, but thats just me.--Wikialexdx (talk) 08:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Big?

message: I looked on my TV guide, and I saw, instead of All That going directly into season 8, it starts going into season 5 (again) Whats up with that?
I looked on my TV Guide and it said the exact same thing. If this turns out to be true, one thing I fear is that they've only chosen to add Seasons 6 and 7 to the line up, for now, anyway. The odd part to me is why they didn't go back to Season 3, unless The N just wants to air three seasons at a time...Crockhun (talk) 13:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 5 

message: Ok i noticed that User:Mrschimpf has changed the Rerun section, but thats ok, but i want to know whats the diffrence between Syncdication and rerun? --Wikialexdx (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rerun or Syncdiation? 

message: I changed the episodes that are playing list to only a * on season 5, because technically that's the one that's playing right now. I will take the responsibility to change it whenever there's a different season on, it's just I feel it makes more sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.224.94.122 (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes 

message: Ok so i know we all thought that All That is going to keep going for a long time, and keep airing seasons not played in syndication before. Well I checked on my guide on my TV and it just replaces it with Zoey 101, and Unfabulous. Also I don't see Kenan and Kel either. But my main confusion is that it says on The-N.com's guide that it'll be playing at the regular times. What is up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.129.116 (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely Confused 

message: Okay, who's wacky idea was it to make up another little "spin-off" article. It sounds like it was written by a kid and has no proof to it. I would delete it because we all got tricked by this once.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.138.232 (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-off 

message: Where on their website did it say this? Crockhun (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Returning to The N? 

message: Is it really true that it's completely gone? That's so depressing...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.156.228 (talk) 23:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Done on The N? 

message: Okay, I've been going to this article occassionally over the past few months....and I have seen so many different stories on it, its crazy. I complained back in the Summer about the crazy rumors about the Seasons coming on the N, and now I am complaining about how there have been so many crazy stories about it returning in Feburary on The N. I know articles are gonna get hacked, but is there ANY proof? Any at all? Its my personal opinion that this whirlwind needs to stop. Crockhun (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can We Get Some Things Straightened Out? Please? 

message: Man, can you idiots stop posting this BS. I know you miss All That and I do to but stop getting peoples hopes up by posting stuff that aint true. Unless you have a source that proves its coming back, then remove the part where it says it it. Ive searched all over the internet too to see if there was ANY source that said this but I found nothing. Now I know its complete BS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.187.181 (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  returning to TeeNick in September 

message: Should it be noted that Former cast member and Stand-up comedian Gabriel Iglesias,
referenced in his Comedy Central Special: "I'm Not fat I'm Fluffy", That he was Once an All That cast member?
Souper Chiva (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gabriel Iglesias

message: For some reason, 'Avatar: The Last Airbender' is a related show to "All That", when in reality, it shouldn't be. I think back in the day, this was added on because one of the former cast members voiced Sokka on The Last Airbender, but.. again, in reality, the show shouldn't even be in the related slot, as it isn't related to Sketch Comedy at all.
So.. thoughts on this? -- »»»DavidTwo2012«««  16:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I, of course, agree which is why I removed it from the list. Common cast is never a reason for having shows listed as related. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inquiry about removing "Avatar: The Last Airbender' from the Related Shows 

message: As far as I can tell, the "All That" machine (which I did not create) refers to a long wave of actors and actresses that spun off into other shows where they had a more prominent role, all the way through Sam and Cat last year. Amanda Bynes was the first person who went that route after appearing on All That, when she started hosting the Amanda Show in 1999.  While Nancy Sullivan is not nearly as prominent as Drake & Josh themselves, she was an important sketch player on the Amanda Show and played Drake & Megan's mom/Josh's step-mom, Audrey, on Drake & Josh. --Thebirdlover (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The explanation is much appreciated, thank you. Edit summaries are our friends! :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: In response to [[User:Cyphoidbomb]]

message: I'm completing a mass edit, as I write this, to clean up this page. To start most of the links are dead, that will need to be investigated.
Water78 (talk) 21:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass Edit 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on All That. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081103092758/http://www.nick.com:80/all_nick/specials/areYouAllThat/videos/ to http://www.nick.com/all_nick/specials/areYouAllThat/videos/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on All That. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151118231721/http://www.joshserver.com/press/josh-server-will-join-comikaze-expos-all-that-reunion/ to http://www.joshserver.com/press/josh-server-will-join-comikaze-expos-all-that-reunion/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The 2017 proposal to merge All That Live! to here seems very reasonable; that single episode has no evidence for independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I believe it should be merged into the show's fifth season page.
--Water78 (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good place--Fradio71 (talk) 20:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: There were recent edits done that regard the current cast listing on the main article that I'd like to discuss. There are two options, one features the current cast, and the second option is one that features a complete listing of of all cast members (from original, relaunch, and revival). I prefer the one that features just the current cast, and if somebody wants more information then they can visit the separate individual page for that information. Water78 (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast List on Main Article 

message: Not sure if it should be called Season 11 anymore. See Talk:All That (season 11). HurricaneGeek2002  (talk) 20:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 11 or 1? 

message: To say it doesn’t count is ridiculous. 35 of the 36 episodes were produced. You can’t tell me that two episodes were not produced when there’s a list of 35 episodes right there in the season of 36 ordered episodes being discussed--CreecregofLife (talk) 23:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The clip show is still a produced episode