lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dalrymple Arbuthnot

message: I have some problems and questions about this article.  Here is the original article text:
 Sir Dalrymple Arbuthnot, 5th Bt of Edinburgh, CMG, DSO,
 JP. Born India 1 April 1867. Died 31 March 1941. Colonel, RFA; Hon
 Brigadier General, 1920. Served Chitral 1895 (medal with clasp), [[South
 African War]] 1899-1902 (despatches, two medals, five clasps), WW I
 (despatches eight times, Brevet), commanded 12th Corps 1916, Order 
 St Michael & St Lazarus of Italy. Married, 15 January 1918, (Alice) Maud 
 ("Maudie") Arbuthnot (born 14 July 1880, died 16 October 1969) 
* "Colonel RFA": as far as I can determine, RFA means Royal Field Artillery. 06:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Source reads "Served in the European War 1914-18 (Despatches, Brevet-Colonel, CMG, DSO)" which undermines Herostratus conclusion. Kittybrewster 06:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Does this site help any? It says he was CRA (Colonel of Royal Artillery) May 1915, commanding 28th Division, BGRA (Brigadier General Royal Artillery) XII Corps at Salonika January–July 1916, CRA 23rd Division January 1917–July 1918, and BGRA XXIII Corps July 1918–armistice. Choess 07:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Original source (Memories) says "Brigadier-General Sir Dalrymple ...". Burke's Peerage puts it differently - see note in text - Kittybrewster 06:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article
Talk:Thomas R. Norris

message: This text reads like it was copied from his medal citation, which is a valid copy since it's a US government publication, but it still needs to be rewritten as an encyclopedia article.  Zoe (216.234.130.130 21:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although the MOH citation states that Norris was a member of STDAT 158 while he performed the actions described, he was actually a member of the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam Studies and Observations Group. SOG was redesignated STDAT 158 on 1 May 1972, one month after the actions described in the citation. RM Gillespie (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: I cannot believe that more of a description of the rescue operation is not given. This was the height of the NVA "Easter Offensive" in Quang Tri Province and the two airmen in need of rescue were LtCol I. Hambleton and Lt. Clark (son of WWII General Mark Clark). This story has been told (with a great deal of embellishment) in the best-selling book "Bat-21" and in a movie of the same name. RM Gillespie (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a suggestion then, RM Gillespie: why don't you tell more of the true story and provide additional details of the rescue operation if you think it's appropriate and relevant to the article as it exists now? Azx2 23:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

text: It's obvious that this man has seen more action than described, just count his medals. Small wonder given his occupation. There must be millions of persons still alive who have done things we would respect but will not be told. Many of them didn't even get a medal for their troubles. So necessarily their CVs will remain incomplete here until solid documentation is declassified when nobody really cares anymore. JB. --92.195.77.74 (talk) 06:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Omissions
Talk:Turunmaa-class gunboat

message: I faintly remember a story about two Styx missiles (Finnish name: MtO 66) being launched from Turunmaa. I think it was during the testing phase before they were added to the Osa-II missile boats (Finnish Tuima class). I think that's what these two plane silhouettes on Turunmaa are for. Don't know if it's significant or worth mentioning on the article. --Laisak 21:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would fit nicely in the history section. I have some more pictures of Karjala from my last trip to the harbour, will shoot some more and upload next year after the holidays. This database page for Harpoon (computer game) has some more info on sensors and electronics, not that I'd use that before cross-checking with other sources (Jane's would be nice). Scoo 22:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think (90% sure) the story was in "" I should really buy that book and not just depend on it being free to loan in the library when I need it. --Laisak 22:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  SS-N-2 capability 

message: Why does the info box say "30 officers, 40 conscripts" instead of something like "30 officers, 40 seamen?"?. And how do you get 30 officers into a 700-ton ship anyway? I grant you that main gun probably took a lot of maintainance (I'd by more frightened of that than most SSMs), but a 3-4 officer/rating ratio seems excessive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.88.66.54 (talk) 15:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: More accurately it would be 30 cadre and 40 conscript crew (i think). Meaning that of the 70 men crew 40 were conscripts of various ranks - seamen, NCOs, (reserve) officer trainees - and the rest 30 were actually professional soldiers employed by the Finnish Navy (officers, specialists and so on). - Wanderer602 (talk) 08:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: crew?
Talk:The Greenspun Corporation

message: Does anyone know if Studio Vegas is still a working subsidary?  Vegaswikian 21:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Studio Vegas
Talk:Lélio

message: I wasn't sure why it was tagged so I left the tag on it, but I found some small errors and tried to clean it up a little.
--Icthusgirl 21:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under Recordings it states that Boulez's recording of Lélio is in the Public Domain. I can't find any sources for this (and it appears to have been released commercially). If true, we need a citation, and if false, it needs to be removed. 89.242.177.88 (talk) 10:15, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Domain?
Talk:Chris Brown (field hockey)

message: I am finding new information for this page.Please be pateint! Thanks everyone!
 
i love chrisbrown.
youis sexy.what yo cell phone numda baii
call me 1- 318 730-3028  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.80.117.25 (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Waza National Park

message: Leo1pard (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: The answer is here. Leo1pard (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I used ''[[Cameroon lion]]'' instead of ''[[West African lion]]'' 
Talk:Mount Pisgah (mountain in North Carolina)

message: Some mention could probably be added about the construction of the (highly visible) transmitter tower and the path up to it which remains open as a popular hiking trail.
It would also be nice if someone could add in some descriptions of the mountain itself (height, hiking trails, etc.) in addition to the rather lengthy historical details.
I did add the section on "Local Broadcasting Controversy" involving the WLOS-TV tower.  I have sat in on the meetings involving this controversy, and I am still following it.
Csneed (talk) 02:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

message: I removed the History section, which was a copy-paste from this site. This leaves a hole in the article, Interested editors my wish to add back a History section, but please take care to use your own words.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue
Talk:Scalar potential

message: The articles on potential and [scalar potential]] seem to be substantially the same. Worse, the article on potential is filled with cruft and inaccurate remarks that should be deleted or heavily edited. Thus I propose a merge, and a disambiguation....Oh, never mind, I'll just do it. linas 17:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Why are the sub-section "Edit" buttons in Russian?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.92.149 (talk) 12:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-Section Edit Button 

message: Not all symbols are defined in the equations that are presented in the "Calculating the scalar potential" section. What is R(tau) for example? Also, no references are given. So, neither the equations nor the claim that "This formula is known to be correct if"... can be verified. This section really needs a reference to the information source or to further information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pms549 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calculating the scalar potential 

message: A formula is rigorously derived where the integrand is a multiple of  \vec{F}(\vec{r}') \bullet (\vec{r} - \vec{r}')  instead of  \vec{\nabla}_{\vec{r}'} \bullet \vec{F}(\vec{r}') .   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Math buff (talk • contribs) 08:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It follows by integration by parts.  It does not require pages of calculation.  Also, since I see you add long proofs to a lot of articles, you should familiarize yourself with the the manual of style for mathematics: "as a rule of thumb, include proofs when they expose or illuminate the concept or idea; don't include them when they serve only to establish the correctness of a result."  There is general consensus that long proofs like the ones you are adding here (and elsewhere) are not appropriate for Wikipedia, so do not be surprised if they are removed.  Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calculating the scalar potential for n dimensions 

message: In the above mentioned chapter, the definition "The surfaces of constant pressure are planes parallel to the ground." is used. This might well be true for volumes with even ground, but regarding a lake, the definition should be "The surfaces of constant pressure are planes parallel to the surface, which represents the plane of zero pressure". Nevertheless, also this definition only holds true for undisturbed systems, in line with the example of the vertical vortex described a few lines further down. If I am not mistaken, a similar effect can be observed within any flowing liquid such as water in a river.
If someone could justify to prefer to use of the "parallel to the ground." definition, it would be great. Otherwise, I'd like to alter the definition according to that described above.
132.187.199.137 (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressure as buoyant potential
Talk:American armored fighting vehicle production during World War II

message: I don't see mention of the 17pdr Firefly Shermans. Are they subsumed in non-76mm, or what?  Trekphiler 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Fireflys and other 17 pdr shermans are conversions of tanks supplied to the British, so they would have been 75 mm vehicles as produced. GraemeLeggett 09:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that's a "duh" to me, huh? Should've figured it out. On another note, am I being picky about disliking "Medium M3/M4", as opposed to "M3/M4 Medium"?  Kreskin 09:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Adding the various subtotals gives 102,253, not the 88,816 listed under "all types and derivatives" and somehow this pretty major discrepancy should be fixed. DavidKVT (talk) 07:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Total production lacks an entry for 1945. --Denniss (talk) 07:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Official munitions production of the United States by months, July 1, 1940 - August 31, 1945," found here, which seems to generally agree on numbers (for instance, M3 light tanks numbers agree exactly for the sub-table), lists for the 8 months of 1945 before VJ-day: 11,583 tanks, 1,671 armored cars, 1,868 "tank conversions" (I do not know what this means), and 2,651 "remanufactured and modernized tanks and cars," so depending on what should be included here (and I feel unqualified to decide), some number between 11,583 and 17,773 can probably be sourced for a 1945 column. DavidKVT (talk) 08:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers don't add up
Talk:Albert Gregory Meyer

message: Would it be helpful to take the one 'Bishop' section and make into 3 sections? 
For example:
Bishop of Superior, Wisconsin
Archbishop of Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Archbishop of Chicago, Illinois
For article on Bishop Augustine Francis Schinner I made this kind of change for a bishop with multiple appointments. It makes room for additional content to be added into each section.
Being somewhat new to wikipedia, I'm asking for feedback and suggestions.
Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 01:16, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divide 'Bishop' section? 
Talk:John Alexander Low Waddell

message: Are these the same person? I noticed that the birth and death year are the same and some of the bridges seem the same too. Perhaps a merge is in order? Thoughts? ++Lar 22:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: At least one editor of each page concurred when I asked, them, and there being no objections, the merge has been accomplished. Redirect left at main page, content merged to this one. No need to merge the talk pages as the merged page talks only about this merge on the talk page and nothing else... ++Lar 19:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The links in red have no content in them, I think the red hyperlinks should be removed and just left as normal text. Beski001 (talk) 06:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Untitled'''
Talk:John Alexander Waddell

message: John Alexander Low Waddell and John Alexander Waddell
Are these the same person? I noticed that the birth and death year are the same and some of the bridges seem the same too. Perhaps a merge is in order? Thoughts? ++Lar 22:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: at least one editor from each page concurs, these articles probably do apply to the same person. I shall merge the content from this one (the shorter one) into the larger John Alexander Low Waddell shortly. I have added tags and will probably do it later today or tomorrow unless there is objection.++Lar 23:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge has been accomplished. Redirect left at main page, content merged. No need to merge the talk pages as the merged page talks only about this merge on the talk page and nothing else... ++Lar 19:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of German guided weapons of World War II

message: I del Bachem Ba 349 Natter (Viper); it wasn't a SAM, but a rocket-propelled aircraft. (That it was little more than a manned SAM doesn't make it a SAM.)  Trekphiler 22:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Full name was apparently Ruhrstahl X-7 Rotkäppchen. Should probably mention if a solid source can be found.©Geni (talk) 22:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: X7
Talk:DumDum Boys

message: "…most important Norwegian rock bands of all time…" "regarded as one of the classic albums in Norwegian rock. The same is true for their 1989 album, Splitter Pine."
Hm. --192.166.198.226 (talk) 23:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanboy article

message: Do all the members realy need their own articles?
:Each member's article is a barely a sentence. The information can be contained in the band's article until such time that someone can expand each member's article. D-Rock (Yell at D-Rock) 22:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Band members

message: According to the respective articles, these are two names for the same band. ("In 1985 the band changed their name..."). Pburka (talk) 19:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Wannskrækk]]
Talk:History of chemical engineering

message: I'm rather new to adding new content to Wikipedia and don't wish to add a great deal of content to this document.  However, I recently wrote a paper on the History of Chemical Engineering (found here: ) complete with bibliography.  If anyone would like to use my paper in order to add content to this document, please do so as long as my paper is cited somewhere in the update.  Thanks --Eman502 (12/20/05)
:The above link is now not found and the main website is empty.Chemical Engineer (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Content

message: I think this article needs cleaning up. I've started making some changes, but in general the article feels a bit like a first year tute assignment and not an encyclopaedia article. It needs sections, citations, links and references. I think the text also needs a stronger sense of chronology, breadth and a less determinist POV. Journeyman 04:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Batch processes are not necessarily inefficient. It is dependant on the kinetics of the situation. Some yeast growing processes are batch controlled, rather than continuous fermentation, and this is more of a general commodity product than an expensive one. This is a bit of a note, as my Chem eng history is quite poor. User A1 16:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batch Processes 

message: History of chemical engineer 122.173.26.88 (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice
Talk:Dubious

message: The wiktionary entry is woefully inadequate, consisting of only three synonyms and leaving it at that. The word is quite relevant to philosophy and religious thought and explorations of the meaning of the concept that the word rerpesents may warrant an article unto itself.
Try merging it with the Doubt article, and expand on notions of 'dubious' from there. Drakonicon 15:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yeshivat Har Etzion

message: Shiurim in cyrillic?!?!? Cyrillic is an alphabet not a language!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.60.131 (talk) 09:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyrillic 

message: I don't think every ram needs to be red-linked.  Only the roshei yeshiva and figures well known outside the yeshiva should be, as the others will most likely not have articles written for them anytime soon (at least not on the english wikipedia site).
But seeing as this could impinge on someone's כבוד, it's best if I don't do it.
-שמואל  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.90.98 (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Pages for ramim 

message: Sorry, but alot of the article reads like a promotional brochure, and not like a neutral encyclopedia article.  For example, the second paragraph reads:
"YHE has a faculty of renowned Torah scholars whose diverse styles, backgrounds and approaches complement one another in an effort to create an open and challenging environment for students. The Rabbeim serve as exceptional role models who view themselves as mentors striving to imbue students with passionate, authentic, rational, and religiously intense lifestyle."
There are several other places where this occurs, including the entire "values" section.  While this language is great for the yeshiva website, it does not belong in an encyclopedia article.
שמואל  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.90.98 (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic writing style 

message: Their essays and shiurim appear to be very Modern Orthodox, a conscious difference from Haredi Orthodoxy. But the article presently doesn't quite indicate the stance of the school of such issues. Looking at their VBM it appears to be at least as modern Orthodox as RIETS at Yeshivah University, and the RCA (Rabbinical Council of America.) Considering the shift to the right at RIETS and the RCA over the last generation, might it be fair to say that Yeshivat Har Etzion is decidedly modern Orthodox, as opposed to the more "right" Centrist Orthodox? Is any significant part of Yeshivat Har Etzion as open as Open Orthodoxy?  What kind of teachings do they have about Masorti Judaism? Do any of their faculty have any cooperation with non-Orthodox Judaism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.63.98 (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Orthodox?
Talk:Emmanuel Olisadebe

message: Does he speak fluent Polish?
"He was a strong contender for the FIFA World Footballer of the Year 2001." ==> ??
He came in last place with 1 point. I removed that line. M.E.
:Why erase it?  I changed it to read that he was a contender but only received 1 vote.--Milicz 23:16, 
24 February 2006 (UTC)
You would think he's a legend or something. Such a joke.
:He pretty much singlehandedly qualified Poland for their first WC appearance in 16 years, that's no joke. --67.36.194.92 20:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What makes him Polish?  He is a naturalized Polish citizen and he used to represent Poland, but he is not Polish.  His mother is Nigerian as is his father.  So he is not really Polish.  Norum 22:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Polish'' footballer? 
Talk:Helen Keller! The Musical

message: In trivia, a sentence reads: 'SP creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker, before starting the South Park series, made a movie called Cannibal! The Musical. This episode's title is almost surely based on it.
Removed the last bit concerning the title. They are similar, but we have no way of knowing if it's correct. Bjelleklang  -  talk 22:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh Jesus Christ.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.94.144 (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from article

message: I agree with the suggestion to merge the articles, until such time as Gobbles may make a second appearance on the show. 207.69.137.27 02:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Gobbles (South Park) with Helen Keller! The Musical 

message: Does anyone know what that alien creature at the end of Cartman's "vision" is? Chronolegion (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a creature from the movie Inseminoid. --Captain Infinity (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same old crap 

message: I am sure I saw it in early 2000, along with "World wide recorder concert", "Pip", toth fairy episode, cherokee episode, jakasaureses....was this releaed in november 2000?--88.90.204.18 (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  november 2000?
Talk:List of parody films

message: Article is written in an opinionated, unprofessional manner. If this article should even be kept, it's going to need some improvements. --Spring Rubber 22:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it's been taken care of. Yeah, this is probably the best way to go. --Spring Rubber 22:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: The article again needs to be rewritten.  I will make it a better format within the next few weeks after I finish adding comedy films not listed in the list of all the films.  In the mean time, I will add any spoof movies that I come across and add them to be resorted later. --Nehrams2020 01:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Wang Zhaojun

message: 33BC they met and in 31 BC he died yet they had four children? Yikes! Fionaussie (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOUR children in 2 years?! 

message: Life/Entering the harem: Would you mind explaining/expanding on this term? It does not make sense in English. If I understood what is meant, I could perhaps help by editing it so the English version of the expression makes sense, or provide an explanation in a note. Thank you. Fionaussie (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mole of widowed tears" 

message: This page is linked to from the 4 Beauties of Ancient China which refers to a woman called Wang Zhaojun who's married to Huhanye in 33 BC (listed as a spouse here). But the article itself is about a man born in 20 BC. I think there needs to be a disambiguation page here - if I search Wang Zhaojun it goes straight here 81.106.9.203 (talk) 11:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two people merged together