Talk:Louis F. Budenz

message: Can someone provide a citation on this statement:
The reliability of this testimony was questioned, as on two previous occasions Budenz had specifically stated that he had no knowledge that Lattimore was a Communist.
Thank you. Jtpaladin 16:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation on reliability of testimony

message: Budenz became known because of his anti-Communist testimony, yet that is not mentioned at all in the opening, main paragraph of his article.
May I suggest an opening sentence like this? :
Louis Francis Budenz (1891-07-17 – 1972-04-27) was a Soviet espionage agent who renounced Communism and became an  informant for the FBI, testifying (often paid) before numerous Senate and House committees during the 1940s and particularly the 1950s.
Aboudaqn (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about opening paragraph

message: I could not access the original link used at the first ref in this article:
* 
Nor was I successful tracking down whether it might simply have a new url.
I think the following url supports the claim, so I am replacing the ref:
* --SPhilbrick(Talk) 21:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced non-working link 

message: It is common, in some places, to use a footnote to add a colorful anecdote, or additional explanatory material, not fitting into the flow of the main document. That practice is generally not encouraged in Wikipedia, as far as I can tell. I posed the question here. While the full community has obviously not weighed in, the consensus appears to me that quotes should be revered for two related classes of use:
# In a case where there may be controversy about a particular fact, and whether the cited reference supports that fact, the use of the quote will make it easier for readers and editors to reach their own conclusion, by citing the specific quote used to support the fact. This is particularly important where a reference may be not online, or behind a pay wall.
# When an opinion is paraphrased, the quote will help readers and editors determine whether the paraphrase is accurate.
This article did have a quote in a footnote, and it is my opinion that the quote does not support either use listed above, thus I have removed it, or truncated it. Should anyone disagree, or feel that there are other examples of allowable quotes, feel free to start a discussion. I suggest here, if you disagree with my conclusion that this quote doesn't fall into one of those two examples, or at Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content#.22brief_verbatim_textual_excerpts.22_revisited if you feel there should be other allowed uses.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 21:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote in footnote removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Louis F. Budenz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927223300/http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page50.html to http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page50.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified