Talk:Burzynski Clinic

message: Other investigators have been successful in duplicating some of his results. It's my understanding that BLP requires removing the false claim that  "other investigators have not been successful in duplicating" any of his results. We all know: Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous.  This is obviously poorly sourced as it is contradicted by w:V .gov sources.  I've pulled it. If anyone want's to revert, I urge a visit to  Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard as a next, pre-revert step. RudolfoMD (talk) 04:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Classic WP:CRYBLP. Questions of experimental replication are not biographical; you just need a reliable source saying whether the replication has happened (or not). Bon courage (talk) 07:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP violation 

message: The source https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3527634/ should really not be used for anything like a factual claim, as it's ABOUTSELF material - Burzynski's own self-serving statement, with no objective review, and including contentious and likely tendentious claims like "The treatment was free from significant side-effects and resulted in objective response in a number of advanced cancer cases". After half a century, there should be an independent source for this, and almost certainly would be, if it were objectively true. Guy (help! - typo?) 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable [[WP:ABOUTSELF]] source 

message: The wording is a bit close, but it is a paraphrase. Rather than deleting it, suggest a reword. MrOllie (talk) 02:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: False.  It's not a paraphrase.   It's bloody verbatim copying by JzG contrary to a Wikipedia policy with legal considerations. WP:C / COPYRIGHT. RudolfoMD (talk) 04:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's called plagiarism. Putting it in quotes and attributing it solved the problem. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 07:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Now it's more messed  up.  a cancer expert and an FDA official told Reuters and Reuters said aren't the same. RudolfoMD (talk) 04:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, perhaps you should have left well alone, then, since your clumsy attempt to fix the “problem” of reality rejecting Burzynski’s piss therapy seems to be the root cause of all this drama. Guy (help! - typo?) 09:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim of copyright violation 

message: Beware Talk page vandalism removing active discussion. RudolfoMD (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Now a third time. I was archiving old and inactive content and didn't notice you had left comments in some of them. Now you have restored the whole thing. I'll be more careful with the next try. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 07:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

text: To avoid this in the future, don't comment on such old threads. Start a new thread. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 07:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!  Such helpful advice.  SO kind of you. RudolfoMD (talk) 07:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page vandalism. 

message: RudolfoMD (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice 

message: The article is slanderous. Reliable source : Burzynski documentary. Cancer cure cover up. It’s big business. He’s not a quack. Big $ has all the power to run smeer campaigns on anyone they like. The fda & Texas medical board were so despicable & unashamedly bold in taking him down because of his non invasive EFFECTIVE treatment of cancer. There are so many testimonials court appearances protests & news reports in this 2 part documentary it’s mind blowing. Deedssky (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That documentary is not a reliable source. Far from it. Bon courage (talk) 06:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2024