lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Braided Hopf algebra

message: The first line says that a braided Hopf algebra is a Hopf algebra in a braided monoidal category whereas the definition certainly does not say this.
1) Your're totally right, although this is a sad example of historical naming. 
2) You get no reaction, so I am so bold to change it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pacman 2.0 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion about the naming (resolved)
Talk:Weston Park Boys' School

message: Another nice stub school article which I have assessed as Stub / Low. Needs more content and continuation of good referencing, a picture would also be nice. Camaron1 | Chris 19:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Lake Providence, Louisiana

message: I added the education section.  I have never been to this town. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wonder, really... does the museum better represent the town than the lake for which it is named?  I see the image was removed from the article entirely, which seems extreme.Unfriend13 (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of the lake gone 
Talk:Kumano Nachi Taisha

message: This sentence: "The Kumano Kodō route connects it to other sites under the same classification, all of which are in Nachikatuura, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan." is unclear at best, and at worst makes the claim that the Kumano Kodo is located entirely in Nachi-Katsuura Town. The Kumano Kodo is *not* located entirely in Nachi-Katsuura. Of the sites listed in the next sentence: "The four sites on the route classified as pilgrimage destinations and Wold Heritage Sites are: 1) Nachi Taisha; 2) Hongū Taisha; 3) Hayatama Taisha; 4) Koya-san.", only one is in Nachi-Katsuura (Nachi Taisha). Hongu Taisha is in Hongu (which is over an hour away from Nachi-Katsuura), Hayatama Taisha is in Shingu City (again, 45 minutes away), and Koya-San is on the other half of the prefecture - over 3 hours away. As I understand it, the Kumano Kodo actually spans a substantial portion of Wakayama Prefecture, if not parts of neighboring Mie Prefecture as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.77.113.184 (talk) 23:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location mistake...
Talk:Branched covering

message: Please keep the scheme theoretic examples on this page! The main problem with wikipedia math pages is the lack of useful examples.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.234.13 (talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: These example would be useful if they where written for a wider audience. As they are, they can be understood only by people knowing scheme theory, and are thus of no use for others (see WP:TECHNICAL). D.Lazard (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

text: Let's have a separate section then for a scheme-theoretic interpretation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.98.8.3 (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: There is a circular definition with unramified covering, ramification locus and the definition of the open set W.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgc1994 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular definition 

message: A math article needs a definition of its subject.
Unfortunately, 
  "a map is a branched covering if it is a covering map everywhere except for a nowhere dense set known as the branch set" 
is not a definition. It is a rough description.
Nothing wrong with including a rough description — that is a very good idea. But it doesn't substitute for a definition.
I hope someone familiar with the subject can provide a definition, at least for the topological case.71.37.182.254 (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is missing a definition!!! 

message: The section Ramification locus begins with this sentence:
"The set of exceptional points on W is called the ramification locus (i.e. this is the complement of the largest possible open set W')."
This is extremely bad writing. The phrase "the largest possible open set" doesn't mean anything, because it doesn't specify what kind of open set it is referring to.
(Of course, "the largest possible open set" without further specification is the entire space, and the complement of the entire space is not what the ramification locus is. That complement is the empty set.)71.37.182.254 (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely bad writing 

message: The article never defines the term "ramified". Is it equivalent to "branched"? Is an "unramified covering" a covering map? Some clarification is needed here. --Hife (talk) 13:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology: branched/ramified
Talk:Nicosia District

message: According to Statistical Codes of Municipalities, Communities and Quarters of Cyprus per the Statistical Service of Cyprus (2015), Nicosia District has 12 municipalities and 162 communities. These are second-level administrative subdivisions. Some of them are split to third-level administrative subdivisions (quarters), but those third-level administrative subdivisions must not inculed on the template. More over, some communities have the same communal council but they are counted as seperate communities. They have separated geographical codes as second-orded administrative territories. Ι have corrected the article.
For more informations:
*EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR THE CODING SYSTEM
*GEO CODES 2015 (excel)
*Record of changes in the geographical codes from 2001
Xaris333 (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipalities and communities
Talk:Famagusta District

message: Why article of Famagusta city show population of 40,920, if 50 times bigger Famagusta District has 46,900 inhabitants? There is a high probability that there is an error in Famagusta city or Famagusta District article. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 18:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Famagusta District population here and in official census includes only the government controlled area of the district, i.e. the smaller southern part (see ). That's also mentioned in the article (”This part of the district has a population of 46,900 inhabitants”). Famagusta city is not located in that part. De jure and de facto situations in the island cause constant confusion. It might be possible to calculate some population estimate for the whole de jure district based on  and . --Tomisti (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: According to Statistical Codes of Municipalities, Communities and Quarters of Cyprus per the Statistical Service of Cyprus (2015), Famagusta District has 8 municipalities and 90 communities. These are second-level administrative subdivisions. Some of them are split to third-level administrative subdivisions (quarters), but those third-level administrative subdivisions must not inculed on the template. More over, some communities have the same communal council but they are counted as seperate communities. They have separated geographical codes as second-orded administrative territories. Ι have corrected the article.
For more informations:
*EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR THE CODING SYSTEM
*GEO CODES 2015 (excel)
*Record of changes in the geographical codes from 2001
Xaris333 (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipalities and communities
Talk:Kyrenia District

message: According to Statistical Codes of Municipalities, Communities and Quarters of Cyprus per the Statistical Service of Cyprus (2015), Kerynia District has 3 municipalities and 44 communities. These are second-level administrative subdivisions. Some of them are split to third-level administrative subdivisions (quarters), but those third-level administrative subdivisions must not inculed on the template. More over, some communities have the same communal council but they are counted as seperate communities. They have separated geographical codes as second-orded administrative territories. Ι have corrected the article.
For more informations:
*EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR THE CODING SYSTEM
*GEO CODES 2015 (excel)
*Record of changes in the geographical codes from 2001
Xaris333 (talk) 20:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipalities and communities
Talk:Raise the Red Lantern (novella)

message: The article does not explain how "Raise the Red Lantern" is related to "Wives and Concubines" Tarayani 19:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Raise the Red Lantern is the film adaptation. Sophy's Duckling 07:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, the title "Raise the Red Lantern" was used in the English release of the original novella. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From Lu Tongyin's book:
* Using pinyin I was able to get the Chinese characters
p. 151
*"different" - bu yiyang - 不一样
**Feipu sees Songlian as different
*"surprisingly handsome and youthful" - chuhu yilao de yingjun nianqing - 出乎遗老的英俊年青 - First part means "against elderly"
**Songlian sees Feipu this way
*"very clever" - henyou xinji - 很有心计
**Songlian sees Feipu this way
Sourced from QQCQ p. 173
P. 153
*"feminized weakness" - nüren cai xihuan - 女人才喜欢 - literally a "female desire"
**Feipu says that he likes sweets in this manner - QQCQ p. 190
*"all women are interested in rich men" - nüren dou xiang gen youqianren - 女人都想跟有钱人
**Zuoqian says this in consideration of why Songlian married him - QQCQ p. 175
*"women are too frightening" - nüren tai kepa - 女人太可怕
**Feipu says this - QQCQ p. 222
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese quotes

message: The summary is in a desperate need of being fleshed out a bit more. It's very difficult to follow and doesn't do a very good job of explaining the plot to someone who has not read the book. Even after having watched the film, I had to keep guessing what the author meant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:73:AF0A:A614:10C8:6CC9:90F5:3BD4 (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary rewrite needed 

message: I would like to see if a source describes the Japanese version, but https://core.ac.uk/download/46512002.pdf (what I found so far) just lists it like a directory WhisperToMe (talk) 02:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese version 

message: I found:
*  - Profile page
I don't know if A.A. Lobova is a faculty member of Lomonosov Moscow State University or if she has another affiliation.
While the journal article uses the name "Wives and Concubines" (direct translation of the Chinese title) for the book, it uses "Coral", "Lotus", etc (the translated names of the English version instead of transliterated names like Meishan, Songlian, etc) WhisperToMe (talk) 06:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible journal article?
Talk:BSFA Award

message: The link to Fangorn is misleading: it goes to the Tolkien character. There is currently no Wikipedia page for the actual award winner, UK artist Chris Baker, whose byline is "Fangorn".
See Fangorn's website. --DeafMan 19:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing that. I've switched the link to Chris Baker (disambiguation), and put an entry in there for use as and when someone chooses to create the appropriate Wikipedia article. PWilkinson 18:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:KDU-ČSL

message: Vandal removed links to common Czech word. 
71.99.139.97
You are vandal. You know very good, that this is very vulgar abuse. --Cinik 02:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Introduction (historical)/Header

message: Full protection +cascading was implemented on this page per this discussion on WP:RFPP. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 19:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Wikipedia:Introduction/Header --> tr:Şablon:Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz/Başlık
* Wikipedia:Introduction/TabsTop --> tr:Şablon:Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz/Sekme-Üst
* Wikipedia:Introduction/Tab1 --> tr:Şablon:Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz/Sekme1
* Wikipedia:Introduction/Tab2 --> tr:Şablon:Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz/Sekme2
* Wikipedia:Introduction/Tab3 --> tr:Şablon:Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz/Sekme3
* Wikipedia:Introduction/TabsBottom --> tr:Şablon:Vikipedi'ye hoş geldiniz/Sekme-Alt
: Thank you! Emperyan-message/ileti 13:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add InterWiki
Talk:Snailbeach

message: Added its historical(?) spelling: Snailbatch. Seems to still be known that way locally and the "Snailbatch" spelling is even seen on fingerposts and other public signage in the neighbourhood.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.219.248.118 (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also known as "Snailbatch"
Talk:Up to the Mountain (MLK Song)

message: This should be moved to simply Up To The Mountain (song), because it is not actually Kelly Clarkson's song. NickL1185 19:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it to Up to the Mountain (MLK Song), which is the formal name of the song and needs no disambigation.  I linked Up to the Mountain to it.  Wasted Time R 02:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: It's always fun to see a mainstream media story that's taken wholly from a Wikipedia article.  Here's a CBS News "Celebrity Circuit" story from May 2010 by one Mary Jayne McKay that is obviously just a rehash of what is written here.   Wasted Time R (talk) 20:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feeding the media
Talk:Google Pinyin

message: I don't know why Google has bothered.  I downloaded the installer and then it installed and then... nothing. There seem to be no instructions in English, and the translations I have made from the Chinese instructions are unhelpful; the instructions seem mainly to laud the praises of the software .....  
Later, I figured it out online; you must have support for East Asian Languages installed; I did not.  There were no warning messages from the installer.  As I am not willing to install EAL I will just use the NJstar IME...
Does Google Pinyin IME deserve the honor of a Wikipedia article?
regford (talk) 17:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

message: The Sohu dispute appeared to have settled out of court. I can't find any cite on the matter tho. --Voidvector (talk) 19:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  settled out of court 
Talk:Gymkhana

message: Since there were a number of links pointing to two different subjects: the original Indian gymkhana and the equestrian version, which was a bit confusing and difficult to clear up as it was.  So I have separated the two.  Unfortunately, I do not know enough about India to write this article.  I have taken the original heading from the equestrian article and the equally brief mention from the Gym article and placed them here.  There is a lot of redundancy between the two, but I will let someone more knowledgeable clean that up.
PerlKnitter 20:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you have done a good thing, the topics are so different.  There is or was a lot of stuff on Indian gymkhanas in the gym article that you may want to add in.  I'll do a little cleanup on the equestrian version. Montanabw 21:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments and your help.  On the disambiguation page, I did repoint the link for the equestrian activity so that it points to Gymkhana (Equestrian) rather than the base article.
PerlKnitter 11:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Apologies for not using terms correctly, I'm not an editor. However, the main section of the article and the etomology part are contradicting each other for the terms origin. 84.236.39.235 (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Basbellain

message: Sorry but why is wiki using French (or is it 'Walloon'(?)) names instead of Luxembourg's native (and more known and used) Luxembourgish and German placename spellings?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:226:8FF:FEDC:FD74 (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The use of: Basbellain - linguistic imperialism.
Talk:Guomao, Beijing

message: I'd like to suggest that this page be merged with Dabeiyao as the two are literally the same place. Please discuss this at Talk:Dabeiyao#Merge_to_Guomao.2C_Beijing (talk) 07:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody objected (or said anything) so I've gone ahead and done it. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 04:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Dabeiyao 
Talk:Gaius Papius Mutilus

message: I really like all the detail about Gaius' success in battle and the references seem good.  Maybe in the first sentence replace "that" with "who", just because he's a person.  Also, make sure that you figure out how to make links for terms like "samnite" and "praetor".  It would also be nice to see maybe one or two sentences about his early life if there is any information on it. Romanciv14 20:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aaina (1977 film)

message: Hi,
Following sites suggest that this film was released in 1977 (28-Feb-1977)
* http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0154178
* http://www.jointscene.com/movies/bollywood/Aaina_-_1977/11042
Secondly, a search on bollywoodhungama.com results on following links
* http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/cast/3465/index.html (indicating release date in 1974)
* http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/cast/13191/index.html (indicting release date in 1977)
Thirdly, K. Balachander's filmography, as director, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kailasam_Balachander_filmography) suggest that he directed this film in 1974. 
No definite release dates were given on bollywoodhungama.com while the other two links (imdb and jointscene) specify the release date as 28-Feb-1977. It is quite possible that the film was produced in 1974 while it was released for exhibition in 1977. In those days, this phenomenon was quite common. This is supported by the fact that some of the movies, produced during the lifetime of the senior actors/actresses, were released after their death. For instance, please refer the following line under column "Death" for actor Amjad Khan, who passed away on 27 July 1992:
"Several of the films he had completed when he was alive were released after his death - right until 1996."
In light of the above and based on the release date discussed, this film may be indicated to be produced in 1974 and released for exhibition in 1977, with appropriate note.
Regards,
Charan s05 (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB is not a reliable one and so is "Jointscene" because it lists most of the films' released date as 01-Jan, Bollywoodhungama indicates both the years. We'll have to go for some other sources. --Commander (Ping Me) 17:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of Release
Talk:Tongzhou, Beijing

message: Please improve the article by adding better maps, particularly historical maps.
There was once a distinctive, separate city area called Tungchow, circa 1940.  It had a city wall and moat around it.  Please add such information to the article.
-75.164.229.239 (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  info please 

message: Please ensure the alternate spellings
Tungchow Tungchou T'ung-chou Tongxian
redirect to this article. Thanks! -96.237.4.73 (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: . GotR Talk 02:04, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tungchow Tungchou T'ung-chou Tongxian alternate spellings 

message: In the early 1900s, the place east of Beijing now known as Tongzhou westerners called Tung-chow (-chou) or Tung-hsien. (These administrative division terms are now spelled -zhou and -xian.) Westerners did not seem to understand the difference. What exactly is the difference between these two administrative division terms, both in general history/linguistics and with regard to the history of this place?-96.237.4.73 (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  -zhou vs. -xian administrative division terms 

message: Please add detailed historic maps to the article.
The maps shown here are generally interesting/relevant:
* http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Old_maps_of_Beijing
Those that include the eastern area outside Peking, to the river, show Tungchow.
By far the best is
* http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tongzhou_1926_AMS-WO.jpg
 Description 	
 English: Map of Tongzhou County, Beijing, China. Printed by the British War Office / US Army Map Service.
 Date 	1926
 Source 	University of Texas Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/china_city_plans/
 Author 	United States Army Map Service
This high-resolution map shows great detail, including the old Tungchow city wall, railway stations and individual buildings.
Please add this map to the article! -96.237.4.73 (talk) 22:33, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps
Talk:British flag theorem

message: One British geometer has never heard of this. Shouldn't it be the Norwegian flag theorem? Geometry guy 19:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it seems that name is somewhat established (even though it beeing a lesser or little known theorem in general):
*http://geometry-math-journal.ro/pdf/Volume4-Issue1/5.pdf
*https://jrmf.org/problems/PythagorasRevisited.pdf
*https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02484.pdf
*http://www.student.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1861142/Applications-of-Mathematics.pdf
*https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/British_Flag_Theorem
--Kmhkmh (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

text: Also  (the only instance of any kind of flag theorem in MathSciNet). It doesn't seem to be a commonly used name in research mathematics, but then this sort of elementary geometry is not a popular topic in research mathematics. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that one is the first pdf i've linked above. I think the name is probably somewhat common/popular in (highschool) math education by now, that is you see it popping up in problem corners, on youtube and in various teaching materials you can find on the internet. Overall i think the name is fine, but it should be noted that the current sources of the article don't seem to use them name, but just state it as a nameless property or theorem.--Kmhkmh (talk) 05:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Dabeiyao

message: I'd like to suggest that this page be merged with Guomao, Beijing as the two are literally the same place. Guomao is the more common name, so this would mean a redirect 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Guomao, Beijing
Talk:Bedfont

message: i grew up in bedfont, never heard it called 'east bedfont' in my life. there is a parish called east bedfont, but the town itself is called bedfont. can someone change this article heading. calling our town 'east bedfont' is utterly ridiculous 96.251.63.85 (talk) 07:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be probably be best to point to some early references of the name 'Bedfont' to support what, to you and I is otherwise obvious. The article only has one reference at the moment anyway so a few more would help improve it generally. See Wikipedia:Requested moves to get the article name changed. - KenBailey (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have added an explanatory reference to a mention of West Bedfont as being part of the parish of Stanwell and requested deletion of the redirect for 'Bedfont' to allow this article to be moved in its place. KenBailey (talk) 23:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Bedfont' vs. 'East Bedfont'
Talk:List of hospitals in Beijing

message: I think we should either delete this and merge with List of Hospitals in China OR link to this from there while deleting the list there but the current approach of duplicating the list in two places seems like a bad idea. What would be a preferred approach? QingdaoBeer (talk) 18:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this with List of Hospitals in China?