Talk:Whedonesque.com

message: Some more suggestions before continuing: please please please read WP:HEAD and Wikipedia:MSH#Article titles. For structure, the article ideally will have these sections, in this order: History, Main features, Subsites (if applicable), Reception/Criticism (as appropriate), References, External links. Ideally, it should not focus soley on the site's features and contents, but its encyclopedic details and its relevance away from itself. Also, make sure to not diverge too much into stuff about Whedon rather than the site itself.AnmaFinotera (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, will do. Jclemens (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

text: It's going to take me a bit to get to this, so I've reverted my edits for the time being. Jclemens (talk) 06:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some suggestions

message: Dumping ground of found citations to Whedonesque from elsewhere relevant, to be removed as I add them to appropriate places in the article: Jclemens (talk) 19:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Papers and paper's blogs are reliable, personal blogs are not. miranda 06:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood.  The only personal blog that I planned to link to was Jane Espenson's--since she's a notable person connected to the site commenting about it.  Every source listed above won't necessarily be inserted, just the ones that serve as the best WP:RS to illustrate WP:N and augment what's already there. I stuck my previous work on the page into User:Jclemens/Scratch, where I plan on working on it before adding it back to mainspace--feel free to add that to your watchlist, I'd welcome your feedback on it as it develops, rather than finding out I've completely gone off the rails when I do put it back here. Jclemens (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources to cite

message: Finally I'm going to ask a small favor of you, I'm in the process of creating a better automated article checker tool, please go over this output and use it to improve the article where you can and tell me where the tool is just plain wrong. Details at User:nixeagle/ArticleChecker. You are not required to do this for GA, and you are free to refuse to do so. (I don't really care beyond getting some input).
*WP:AVOID issues (not 100% accurate, just a guideline to problems):
**Per WP:AVOID WP:PEACOCK WP:WEASEL the following words should be carefully considered. This is not a 100% accurate test, but should indicate potential problems.
***In =Whedonesque.com= the following words should be evaluated: associated.
****Reasonable Associated is a good word to flag, but I think it's a reasonably good word in the lead.  In context: "as well as the careers of cast and crew associated with Whedon projects."  That includes people who have acted or crewed on Whedon shows, but also the careers of folks who have been cast in upcoming shows.  For example, Serenity's Chiwetel Ejiofor is a frequent topic, as is Tahmoh Penikett, who has been cast in Dollhouse, but no shows have aired as of this writing.  
***In ===Origin: 2002 through 2003=== the following words should be evaluated: top.
****Somewhat Reasonable in context: "it was cited as one of two top Buffy Internet sites in an article commemorating the show's end."  Not hard work to check, but the citation directly supports that.
***In ===Recognition: 2007 through 2008=== the following words should be evaluated: Best, controversy, relationship.
****All reasonable.  The first is citation-supported, the second is in the name of another Wikipedia article, and the third one could be swapped out with another word.  Come to think of it, relationship is really a shortcut to avoid having to discuss the project at length.
Thanks —— nixeagle 21:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem.  It certainly seems like a useful tool, but top may be a false positive a lot of the time. Jclemens (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Automated article checker

message: * http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/article/187953  Deals with Season 8, mentions W.
* http://www.nypost.com/seven/07152007/entertainment/hot_list_entertainment_raakhee_mirchandani_and_maxine_shen.htm W mentioned re: Runaways.
* http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/article/216228 On Dua Khalil.
* http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/06/strikers-not-writing-but-still-blogging/ More strike stuff
* http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/01/09/joss-whedon-to-direct-episode-of-the-office/ The Office rumor confirmed at W.
* http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/8276/sing-along-with-buffy/ Sing-a-long ref.
* http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/hipclicks/2002-07-17-hipclicks.htm New earliest reference!!!
Jclemens (talk) 03:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Even more possible sources

message: After reading the substantial suggestions by previous reviewer User:Nixeagle and poring over the article, my only complaint with the thing is that it's beginning to look over-referenced. You pass, excellent job. A big thank you to Nixeagle as well, whose criticism drove this article from Good to REALLY Good. I don't know if there are any relevant projects with A-class review systems, but the current page looks as if it could pass one pretty easily. --erachima talk 07:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for your review and kind words. Jclemens (talk) 15:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review: You win

message: It seems the article was updated majorly only once after its GAN, in 2009; if there is any new information pertaining to the past 2 years it should be added. ClayClayClay 07:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Whedonesque.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080825092527/http://www.syfyportal.com:80/news425320.html to http://www.syfyportal.com/news425320.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified