Talk:Grey Goose (vodka)

message: Even the talk page reads like a PR piece  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.187.246 (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The article used to be even more WP:COI than it is now, hard though that is to believe. The truth is that GG is a cynically manufactured product with no cultural history, designed to fill a market niche populated by people with more money than sense. Everything else is PR puffery. --Ef80 (talk) 13:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  astroturfing? 

message: That would be the normal method of disambiguating the vodka from other uses of Grey Goose. JesseRafe 04:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Done. ProhibitOnions (T) 12:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move page to [[Grey Goose (vodka)]]? 

message: This article is pretty interesting, and the history section is informative.  However, the paragraph talking about "perception of quality" seems pretty controversial, and isn't supported by the Freakanomics article cited as authority.  Personally, I can taste a big difference between quality vodkas and store-brand cheapies.  I'd also bet you're going to have a nasty hangover if you drink much of the cheap stuff.  Thoughts?
Thoughts? My thoughts are only to wonder what your personal hangovers have to do with this article. Did a bunch of Grey Goose staff come along to edit the talk page as well as the article? Joe Garrick (talk) 09:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT
There are nothing about trivia exactly there. Anything that could be connected to trivia is "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics..." or "indiscriminate collection of information" subsections. Trivia presence on wikipedia is still in discuss.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Handling_trivia
So trivia is allowed. Furthermore these are trivias maybe for you but important information for me. This is a lifestyle product that has a very heavy impact on nightclub culture that differs it from  about 99% of other vodkas and I want to know it. Can you tell what is triva or not? Probably you could cut off 4/5 of Casablanca movie article because they are trivias.--148.81.137.4 (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Unless and until you can show, with reliable sources, that this information is notable--as in widely covered in mainstream sources--it simply does not belong. → ROUX ₪ 22:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia is allowed 

message: An image used in this article, File:GreyGoose LOrange750.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 28 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:GreyGoose LOrange750.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grey Goose (vodka). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012035254/http://www.beveragebusiness.com/archives/article.php?cid=1&eid=62&aid=906 to http://www.beveragebusiness.com/archives/article.php?cid=1&eid=62&aid=906
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grey Goose (vodka). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060302021802/http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/bizfinance/biz/features/10816/ to http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/bizfinance/biz/features/10816/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello Wikipedians, 
I noticed the Company History section references "Champagne limestone" in the second paragraph, second sentence. I've never seen this particular term used before and a quick Google search appears to indicate the phrase may only be used as a color description (for tiles, paint etc.) I believe what the original author may have meant is that the water is sourced from limestone-filtered springs, similar to the limestone soil in Champagne. But the Champagne reference doesn't seem to add value to this explanation, so I'd suggest rephrasing this sentence as follows:
"The water used to produce the vodka comes from natural, limestone-filtered springs in Cognac, France while the wheat is sourced from farms in Picardy, France."
Please let me know if anyone has thoughts on this proposed change. Thank you, 
--DebateisGreat (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company History - "Champagne limestone" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Rough consensus to move. This was extremely difficult to determine consensus, but taking into the weight of some arguments per WP:RMCI, I have concluded the support side seems to have edged out the opposition in achieving consensus. Most supporters cited WP:DIFFCAPS and WP:PRITOP, whereas no or very limited clear policies were cited by opposition. Some opposer's arguments appear to fall under WP:IDONTLIKEIT, therefore cannot be weighted as strongly as policy based arguments. Overall, there's a majority of support !votes, and some of the oppose !votes are weaker.(non-admin closure)   – CityUrbanism 🗩
The result of the move request was: No consensus as to whether the usage of "Grey Goose" to refer to grey geese is enough to muddy the waters and make impossible a primary topic.   Red Slash 07:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Relisting comment: Relist to allow addition discussion of whether the vodka is primary for Grey Goose, and whether any confusion could be addressed with a hatnote that included a link both to the dab page and to Grey goose BilledMammal (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 March 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn  —Locke Cole • t • c 15:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 April 2023