lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cydoor

message: I believe that Cydoor is really adware.  Yes, today we often use the terms spyware and adware interchangably.
Andros 1337 21:13, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I believe

message: Umm. The "company web page" is just a "Congratulations! You have been selected to receive a FABULOUS PRIZE!" scam. Complete with the classic popup when you try to leave the page- this one reads, hilariously enough, "WAIT WAIT WAIT! get your ipad 2 now! Click cancel to stay on the page!"
I'm gonna go ahead and remove the link. I could cite WP:NOT but I really think this speaks for itself. If anybody objects, please explain why you feel the link should be included before restoring it. --Moralis (talk) 21:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link to Cydoor

message: Quick explanatory note - the content, as it stands, is supported by very old refs, and is self-contradictory - is it 'impossible to remove by most anti-virus software', or can it 'be removed by most anti-spyware software' - needs clarification, tidying up, and ideally more up to date sourcing. GirthSummit (blether) 23:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: Honestly I think the introduction to this article needs a rewrite. It's got broken English ("These spywares hijacks Windows or Macintosh...") and confusing information ("It is a malicious computer program, which cannot be removed by common antivirus software like Malware bytes, Microsoft Security Essentials, Norton, McAfee, Webroot, Kaspersky, Sophos or Avast."). I personally am pretty awful at writing articles, I'm mainly here to help stop vandalism on Wikipedia. But, someone has to do the work. If no one else is able to do it or doesn't have the time, I'll clean it up sooner or later. LewisTehMinerz💬✒️ 17:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction Rewrite
Talk:Spitz

message: Is it really accurate to call the Norwegian Elkhound one of the "larger and more powerful breeds"?  The breed is medium-sized; Akitas are twice as big.
:Signed and dated for archiving purposes only. William Harris • (talk) • 11:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Elkhound

message: I lived in Tonga and Fiji for four years and spitz-like dogs were very common, looking like the Shiba Inu or the Norwegian Buhund. They were fairly mixed, probably from breeding with imported dogs, but most had shorter hair than the above two. Then again, they usually skulked around the edges of villages and were poorly fed so maybe the hair would be longer if better cared for. Just an observation, I couldn't see any references online.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcrooker (talk • contribs) 06:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spitz dogs in South Pacific 

message: Spitz means “pointed” in German [Collins dictionary]. But I don’t know to “source” it for the article. MBG02 (talk) 02:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an OED citation to it. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology? 

message: aim 197.99.34.45 (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aim for spitz 

message: The reason I ask is, they don't have the usual characteristics and I was not able to find reliable documentation on this point. 185.92.25.135 (talk) 15:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the problem is that we have no exact definition of a spitz - the AKC state 'There are between 50 and 70 distinct spitz dog breeds, but some aren’t easily categorized because there is no exact category definition.', I think we should remove the whole list of dogs or narrow it down to only dogs that are very clearly spitz type such as the Pomeranian or German Spitz. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a Chinook actually a Spitz-type dog?
Talk:Billy Klippert

message: Seems non-notable (and note different spelling in article). Second runner-up in a TV contest? Fancruft. — Bill 15:49, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: * Change vote to keep based on updated version of article. Gamaliel 02:54, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed all reference to his birthdate and place, as two separate ones were given, Halifax in '82 or Calgary in '78, take your pick; neither was referenced, and thus they came out. Cheers, LindsayHi 20:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate/place 
Talk:Mitt Romney

message: The sentence, "He was attacked by Trump supporters for not backing Trump's unverified conspiracy theories...", in the context of the 2021 U.S. Capitol attack, could mislead readers into thinking that Romney was physically attacked at the airport. Neither of the two refs uses the word "attacked"; they use "heckled" and "harassed", both of which appear in the preceding sentence. Please change to "Trump supporters were angry that he had not backed Trump's unverified conspiracy theories". 2001:BB6:47ED:FA58:A8E6:3EA1:5219:B7BD (talk) 09:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to reach out if my changes are not acceptable to you. Xan747 (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

text: , that is an excellent edit. Thank you. 2001:BB6:47ED:FA58:8D93:7A35:1165:3DCC (talk) 08:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! Xan747 (talk) 15:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 July 2023 

message: Articles about women usually include information about their family life, even when it isn't relevant.  Why does this article not have anything at all about his family life, given that the senator makes such a big deal of sending out photos of his family?  See this column for an example of how central the issue is to his image: New York Times, "The Hidden Moral Injury of OK Boomer." 49.37.24.220 (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Right in the lead I am told "He married Ann Davies in 1969; they have five sons." There is plenty more (not surprisingly) in the section titled College, France mission, marriage, and children. HiLo48 (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why nothing about his family?
Talk:Cities of Italy

message: This is quite worthless. It consists of a list of the towns that are capitals of provinces (and in fact is behind the times, not including the new provinces). Several major towns are not on it, though larger and more important than many that are, because they are not provincial capitals: Torre del Greco, Volterra, Capua spring to mind but there are many others.
I am not a believer in lists, so I won't work on it: the Category system is far more useful. — Bill 16:33, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: It seems that user IP 63.215.27.59 vandalized on this article and added a derogatory remark to the end of the list.  I removed the vandalism and moved on. jj137 19:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Manna from Heaven

message: Note:  it really is correct that the collection title has the word "manna," while the short story in the collection spells it "mana."  Joyous 16:57, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)
:Yes. that is correct. It may be a typo, or there may be some meaning in it, because manna and mana are two different things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.33.198.74 (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An expanded edition from Positronic Publishing, 2020/2021 adds three stories just before the Amber section:
#Nine Starships Waiting, (nv) Fantastic Stories of Imagination March 1963
#Tunnel Vision, (vi) Galaxy May/June 1994
#The Three Descents of Jeremy Baker, (ss) VB Tech Journal June 1995 / F&SF July 1995
Tom Dean (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Contents
Talk:Boyfriend

message: Really? I'm all for LGBT, freedom and gender equality, so please don't discriminate against heterosexuals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.133.17.83 (talk) 14:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not discrimination that there's only one couple picture there. Someone just never added one for opposite-sex couples (because there's no requirement to probably). Choose one from the Wikimedia Commons if you like and i'll add it. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 16:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We already have two pictures in the article.--В и к и T  16:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Either no pics or get a heterosexual picture in here, too....sigh 

message: The term boyfriendItalic text has been misinterpreted by many writers. Lets take the combined words, "boy"Italic text and "friend"Italic text. The word "friend" means,someone who is not your blood relation. Then, the "boy" as we all know is a male. Therefore, we can conclude that a boyfriend is simply a friend who is a male and not that a boyfriend being a sex partner,and this also applies to the word,"girlfriend".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.29.237.18 (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyfriend 

message: Brannon patterson is also known as the #bestBFintheworld
81.139.213.54 (talk) 08:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Blatant vandalism. JTP (talk • contribs) 15:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2016 

message: I cannot edit it, but the boyfriend article has two right side templates, which is highly redundant with it being the same thing. WolfKanin (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate Template 
Talk:Millenarianism

message: This has, perhaps over time, become a very long list indeed. Is there any merit in using subsections, or dividing it by chronology? Even just separating into 20th century movements and pre-20th century?
Just a thought. As I was looking it over, it just seemed like an overwhelming list. Thanks! Prime Lemur (talk) 07:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say, remove the subsection. It is just a meaningless list within a prose article, and Wikipedia style guidelines don't recommend such a thing. Or split off into a separate list article instead.--Farang Rak Tham  (Talk) 09:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I went ahead and removed the list section. It's just not appropriate to throw in a list like that with little discretion, organization or citations. If anyone wants to add specific notable examples, they can be put in the prose. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 14:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the removal of that quite random list, added piecemeal and over time, I believe, by multiple different editors. Any items possibly added in the future should be accepted only with full reliable references, in my view. Thank you, warshy (¥¥) 18:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section: Movements
Talk:Computer desk

message: The requirements of protection because of a conflict of physiology should be included in any discussion of a computer desk. HP and Compact have removed blinking lights from their Computer CPU's but there are still sources of stimulus your brain can mistake for threat movement. I will continue to investigate but the information is very closely held. Herman Miller Inc has not responded except to suggest that if I was worried about Cubicle Level Protection I should choose a Systems Furniture design that used solid panels rather that semi-opaque glass, plastic, or fabric panels. This type protection is not attached to the desk but is included in walls and moveable panels surrounding the desk, Cubicle. 
If you have a source of information email me from an email link at VisionAndPsychosis.Net  L K Tucker 10/10/04
----
As an anonymous user, L K Tucker (above) of http://visionandpsychosis.net contributed these paragraphs:
"The invention of the computer caused a change in the design of the modern office workstation. Computer desks are designed with different levels of Cubicle Level Protection depending on the perceived use.
About fifty years ago engineers discovered a conflict of human physiology when workers in newly designed Compact-Close-Spaced office workstations began to have bizarre or psychotic episodes. The problem was peripheral vision reflexes. The solution was to block peripheral vision of workers that require deep mental investment to perform their jobs. Not all workstations or computer desks require 'Cubicle Level Protection.
Accounts vary as to the history of this discovery. Recent articles give the date of Herman Miller's Action Office One as 1964. There were articles as early as 1961.
Computer desks may or may not be designed to stand alone and supply protection for the user. Simple desks have only the bare necessities to support a computer and its peripherals.
The theory seems to be that there is not enough human traffic in the home, dorm, student apartment, or small business office to require Cubicle Level Protection in those locations."
----
These ideas are based on original research - see this talk page for more discussion - and are not supported by mainstream psychology.  I would go so far as to describe Mr Tuckers ideas as a crank theory.  Even if it was of some value, it would be more appropriate on a separate article and isn't particularly relevant to the Computer Desk article.  Hence, I have removed said material from this page.  Ppe42 11:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I am suggesting that the computer table and ergonomic desk articles be merged into this one. There is considerable overlap. I suspect that any growth in the article will be common to all three. JonHarder 22:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge.
Talk:Party of the Alliance of Youth, Workers and Farmers of Angola

message: I would move this page back to "Pajoca". I'm not sure that "Party of the Alliance of Youth, Workers and Farmers of Angola" is the actual name of the party, since other reports state that it stand for "Party of the Alliance of Youth, Workers and Farmers of Cabinda" or simply "Party of the Alliance of Youth, Workers and Farmers".--Soman 19:47, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper name
Talk:Paternal bond

message: Here's a relate article:
*Levine, Jon (2003). "Secret of Paternal Bond." BBC News / Health, Tuesday, 25 February.
Paternal bonding (or father child bonding) is an elaborate issue (see: Rossi and Rossi (1991) Of Human Bonding), most men don't claim to have a significant bond to a child until they are able to have intellligent conversations with the child.  A related term is father-infant bond. --Sadi Carnot 12:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Related article

message: Fathers know & recognize their own off spring.
I was named in a paternity case 27 years ago. I was unattached to the mother as she was engaged to someone else. Being a teen and she was in her mid twenties, I was cohersed and socially encouraged into giving up my rights to the child. It was very diffacult and life altering. Now years later after rasing 4 kids in my own marraige,I recently had a chance meeting to see the boy I had given up and I knew instantly he is from me. No words were spoken about the who what when or where. No arrangements were made to ensure anything about anything or who was who. Nature is always right. In all of created life in all the universe there is a balance all on its own and it will find its way law or no law, rules or no rules, social acceptance or social disgrace. Nature is smarter than man.Biglesson (talk) 01:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATURES Paternity 

message: Image doesn't fit to the theme of article (there are lot so over common's like the removed one). This image was more appropriately utilised/placed in other related articles, hence suitable images like father-child cuddle/hug/embrace will be fine here. --Bala(blitz) 22:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image removed 

message: I am wanting to edit this page. I want to add more detailed information about the bonding between fathers and their children. I have more information on this bonding and what happens after the child is born, rather than what happens when the baby is still in the womb. This information will help detail the page and give information on the United States and Aka hunter and gatherers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katdog1022 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Katdog1022 you need to keep context in mind.  learning something about paternal bonding in any given culture doesn't mean it belongs in an encyclopedia entry about the phenomenon. 2603:7080:7C00:71:80D8:8F88:D22C:ADBD (talk) 07:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit the page 

message: This doesn't make sense in terms of relevance or format.  could reference an aka page with a subsection that is relevant.  it doesn't need it's own chapter.  deleting. 2603:7080:7C00:71:80D8:8F88:D22C:ADBD (talk) 07:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  aka? 

message: zapped the aka section due to irrelevance and generally bad formatting, but quite frankly there aren't enough resources cited to make this a well-rounded entry.  it either needs way more cited research or it should be zapped. 2603:7080:7C00:71:80D8:8F88:D22C:ADBD (talk) 07:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  frankly, this entire article needs to be reworked
Talk:Hail to the Chief

message: Is there a point to this section?  The song is so well known that I really doubt this adds anything of real import.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.39.159.36 (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural References 

message: "It was Julia Tyler, wife of Polk's predecessor, John Tyler, who suggested that the song be played when a president made an appearance." The revised, authoritative new statement sounds as if it's based on some remark, perhaps in a letter. Has this suggestion been made in print? --Wetman 03:43, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Julia Tyler]]

message: According to , the anthem was composed in 1917 and formerly called "Hail America", then renamed to "Hail to the Chief" by the Eisenhower Administration in 1952. Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article? --Ahellwig 20:56, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hail America" 

message: The link to "DOD instruction NO. 1005.1" is dead, and I was unable to locate a new page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.15.122 (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Is there an anthem of the Vice President of the United States?  If so, you need to add mention, and a link to any article thereon.
This article seems relevant: "Hail, Columbia."
Jimlue (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Anthem of the Vice President?

message: The article says that verses from Scott's poem "were set to music around 1812", but then it says that around November 1810 "Scott received a letter from a friend and army officer who ended his note with a copy of the music of the Boat Song, 'Hail to the Chief'." If it's the same tune, one of these dates is wrong. If it's not the same tune, this should be somehow clarified.  Bret Sterling (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date discrepancy?
Talk:Labour Party Conference

message: There is far more than just one Labour Party.  I suggest moving this page to Labour Party Conference (UK).  Other proposals, thoughts etc? --Midnighttonight Procrastinating on uni work... 00:11, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: As this article begins with Labour's first conference after the 1997 election, I'm just wondering whether we should start one for the Conservative conference now that they're in office again. Any thoughts? TheRetroGuy (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservative conference 

message: I've just added information on the conferences in the twentieth century from the eighth edition of British Political Facts, but there are a few details missing from that source. It mentions that the 1918 Nottingham conference adjourned for a month before meeting again on 26 February, but then gives the dates of the London conference as 26-28 June. It doesn't mention the special conference on Ireland in December 1920, or any conferences in 1921 and 1922. It also doesn't give the exact dates in October for the end of the conferences in 1965 and 1975. Clarification on these points would be welcome. Opera hat (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  20c conferences 

message: Why not add the conferences since 2000 to the table? It seems odd to have the 20th century conferences in a table and those of the 21st century in prose format. Also, why is there no mention of the 2022 conference? TrottieTrue (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the table is useful for the most part, but also that more detailed information should be in prose form so it can be properly expanded upon. It's probably best to maneuver the notes down to the prose section, and add the basic information from post-2000 to the table. I'll be giving that ago over time. JamJamSvn (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I look forward to seeing that! TrottieTrue (talk) 17:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of conferences and 2022 event
Talk:Tsukioka Yoshitoshi

message: Following  Wikipedia policy on article names (which says "What .. would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?") we have been listing Japanese woodblock prints artists under the names they are commonly known by in the West - which means we do not use their complete names (which are rarely used in the West, and for artists of this era change over time anyway). Please see Talk:Sharaku for an extended discussion on this topic. Please leave them where they are. Thank you. Noel 20:28, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand all that, and if it were up to me, we would always put articles for everyone under their full names, with links from their common names. However, that's not Wikipedia policy, alas (and it's a fight I lost on naming the members of the Medici family). Also, for Yoshitoshi, one has the choice of listing him as Taiso Yoshitoshi or Tsukioka Yoshitoshi. And of course for Hokusai the naming situation is a nightname... Noel 20:50, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article had 11 of Yoshitoshi's illustrations, which is on the high side even though they're not fair use.  There's already a link at the bottom to the Commons repository for Yoshitoshi images, so it's really not necessary to put a bunch of them on his article space.  A few is more than enough to illustrate his style, and even now with 5 left a few more could be removed.  I've gone through and removed all the links to the pics that are already on Commons (they won't get deleted even if no Wikipedia project is using them) and deleted a duplicate display of 1 pic (what was up with that?).  The remaining ones are hosted on en but are also Commons migration candidates.  BrokenSphereMsg me 06:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overillustrated

message: There's no reason not to use his full name as the title, that's how it's displayed on JP wiki as well. - AMorozov 〈talk〉 11:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name for article title 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved Yoshitoshi → Tsukioka Yoshitoshi, Yoshitoshi (disambiguation) → Yoshitoshi. I will fix the incoming links.  No such user (talk) 09:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yoshitoshi →  – No reason not to use the man's full name like all other similar artists of the time and style. His full name is used on Japanese wiki. The redirect was made in 2004 when Wikipedia was still new and conventions were not established, so this can be fixed now. I left a message about the move on the talk page, and nobody has objected in a month. AMorozov 〈talk〉 02:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree that it's probably best in this case. Dekimasuよ! 11:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2022