Talk:Potential evapotranspiration

message: Three different types of evapotranspiration exist: Reference evapotranspiration (ETref), Potential evapotranspiration (ETpot) and Actual evapotranpiration (ETact). The reference evapotranspiration is (based on the definition of FAO publication 56; written in an attempt to standardize the evapotranspiration equations) defined as the evapotranspiration of a standard grass (with defined albedo, bulk surface resistance and aerodymanic resistance) with an unlimited supply of water. Since the evapotranspiration rates of ground surfaces with a soil cover different than grass can very from the standard grass cover, a potential evapotranspiration can be calculated for a specific soil cover. For most agricultural crops, the relation between grass evaporation (under unlimited water supply conditions) and the specific crop has been defined through the use of crop coefficients. For a cotton crop, at full development, the potential evapotranspiration is approximately 1.2 times higher than that for grass. 
The step from potential evapotranspiration to actual evapotranspiration includes multiple stress factors, the main one ususally being the shortage of water supply (others like salinity stress, temperature stress, fertility shortage). A stress factor thus reduces the potential evapotranspiration of a crop to an actual evapotranspiration. 
Reference evapotranspiration is commonly calculated using the climatic inputs for solar radiation, temperature, humidity and windspeed. Several relations exist between these parameters (among which the Blainy-Criddle, the Penman, the Penman-Monteith equations) and the reference evapotranspiration, and all of these relations are empirical. A more theoretical definition of the reference evapotranspiration was developed using the theoretical grass cover [equation published in FAO 56 {eq3?}]. 
The actual evapotranspiration of an area can be calculated based on a water balance (common approach) or an energy balance. Based on the energy balance, the potential evapotranspiration can also be calculated, thus providing an alternative method of obtaining a measure for the crop coefficient.
Rwos 11:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of evapotranspiration

message: Thus, if the above definitions of reference ET and potential ET can be agreed upon, then the current equations on the main page should be under the heading "reference ET". The definition in text is more or less correct, refering to the evaporation assuming a limitless supply of water. 
Rwos 11:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential or reference evapotranspiration 

message: The definition of ETpot in the external link (ag.arizona.edu) does not appear correct. It appears that they have calculated the reference evapotranspiration, since actual ground cover does not seem to be included in the definition. 
Another world-wide calculated map of reference evapotranspiration (based on work of the University of Sussex) is also available on the IWMI website (http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/WAtlas/atlas.htm)
Rwos 11:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: All parameters of the equation should be defined in the article without leaving cryptic N's, L's and Ta's lying around. 99.253.108.67 (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thornthwaite Equation

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Potential evaporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301214648/http://www.watershedhydrology.com/pdf/T%26M%20Revisited.pdf to http://www.watershedhydrology.com/pdf/T%26M%20Revisited.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 14:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Potential evaporation →  – I think the term more widely used in the literature (and more correct) is potential evapotranspiration. See e.g. this publication: https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5449/2023/essd-15-5449-2023.html . It is also more logical as it's a type of evapotranspiration and not a type of evaporation EMsmile (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 February 2024