Talk:CamStudio

message: Has anyone actually used this?  It probably should justify it's wikipedia article's existance, just a bit.  Mathiastck 07:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I don't think this article conforms to WP:NPOV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinxed (talk • contribs) 20:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: ArcaVir antivirus, via http://virusscan.jotti.org, is reporting the official, Sourceforge version of the executable as infected with the IRC backdoor, "Riskware.Virtool.Zombantiantivir" (http://www.viruspool.net/virus.cms?&id=770477). In the interest of preventing the spread of malware, I'm removing the links from this article for now. It is worth noting that none of the other 20 antivirus services detected anything, so this may be a false positive. ~ Eidako (talk) 07:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not our job to censor link to the official website & SF because one AV program suddenly decides to report a program that were release a long time ago as containing virus/trojan/malware. KTC (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I can confirm this is still the case as of today. I downloaded the file straight from camstudio.org, and McAfee quarantined Artemis!935C478B6850. Vegemarmalade (talk) 22:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

text: For the sake of clarity, CamStudio does not contain any adware/malware, but its main installer does. The installer is made by WorldSetup (an adware company) and tries to install third parties applications. The CamStudio devs explained the reasons for that (http://camstudio.org/forum/discussion/1181/camstudio-2.7-is-coming-and-a-word-about-its-future), and said there will always be a way to opt-out during the installation. There also exists another installer which is not bundled with adware and can be downloaded from various websites like Softpedia. Teyut (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly Viral 

message: I have noted that the lossless Codec cannot be transcoded CORRECTLY (No color glitches, etc.) by other open source projects such as Handbrake. The issue has been reported to handbrake, but the moderators there say that the issue will most likely NEVER be resolved. (An example of the color issue with the codec can be found here. The support topic dealing with this can also be found here.) The ONLY transcoder that doesn't crash nor outputs glitchy output, is MediaCoder, which is no longer open source and infringes copyrights it seems. I know this should be on a forum (and it is, in several places), but lack of support for this issue is astonishing. We don't want to be uploading over 300+ MB Files to youtube that just error out, so why isn't there support for this on open source transcoders? (VideoLAN Crashes when trying to transcode) 68.185.166.207 (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So... because the CamStudio Lossless codec isn't properly supported by Handbrake or VideoLAN it's broken in some way? That by itself is not a very good precedent to go by.  In case you didn't know, for those 2 particular programs to be able to properly support a codec, that individual codec has to have support for it manually written into the program libraries by one of the developers, they don't use external libraries.  There's a ton of codecs that don't work properly (or at all) with them because of that. I myself have no problems processing CamStudio Lossless Codec video with VirtualDub and no more problems processing it with Windows Movie Maker then I've had with most other codecs. Also, 3 single posts by the same person to 3 separate forums don't make for a reliable reference. --Brandished (talk) 06:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lossless Codec 

message: The last sentence says they are seeking developers. Isn't that advertising, and shouldn't we remove that? --Thekmc (talk) 22:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on CamStudio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090327145108/http://www.adobe.com:80/devnet/logged_in/sfleischer_captivate.html to http://www.adobe.com/devnet/logged_in/sfleischer_captivate.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090210140551/http://www.adobe.com:80/devnet/logged_in/sfleischer_captivate2.html to http://www.adobe.com/devnet/logged_in/sfleischer_captivate2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on CamStudio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027094429/http://camstudio.org:80/blog/general/camstudio-25-beta-1-released to http://camstudio.org/blog/general/camstudio-25-beta-1-released
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Added section to keep some material from main page visible for future editors while avoiding OR Conflatuman (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned Reportage