lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Warhammer 40,000: Dark Millennium

message: The following:
":Features:
– Focus both on Melee and Long range Combat 
- covering system
- 29 Zones (21 claimable, 8 invadeable)
- Open-World
- PvP around resource gathering and taking strategic points
- center zone features a conquerable stronghold
- No playable Tanks or other Warmachines at release but implemented possibility for expansion
- Tyranids as full fighting PvE-Faction
Lore (being discussed concerning certain faction-plots at the moment but here are the things we determined with Games Workshop so far):
- Game takes place in the southern border-sectors of Segmentum Tempestus
- Factions fight over a destroyed imperial forge world called Tarelis and its hive-city Cerberus X (newly added to the lore!)
- The story of the game will NOT take place in a parallel universe! Just like the Planet Kronus (made by our colleagues at relic) Tarelis will be part of the lore!
- Tyranids will be main-antagonists
- Unfortunately Vigil-games was not allowed to use Relics Gorgutz ‘Ead ‘Unter as Ork Warlord as he will make a final appearance in the second DoW2 expansion
Costs:
- 49.99$
Monthly fee:
- being discussed but most likely around 13$
Rating:
- targeted Teen/PEGI 16"
Was located in the plot section and it's information should be divided and placed in proper sections. Also this article needs its tone fixedAlbert Cruz 20:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: large unorganized section removed

message: If you've seen the trailer, you can see that when one of the players are shooting their weapon at an enemy, there is a shooter crosshair aimed at the enemy. Should this be noted in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.178.50 (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Person Shooter? 

message: I'm pretty sure that this is the same game as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warhammer_Online:_Age_of_Reckoning.  What should be done?  StarkyD (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warhammer AOR 

message: Added what's been revealed so far in interviews with Vigil Games’ General Manager David Adams and Studio Creative Director Joe Madureira. Beepluck (talk) 10:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Newish info added

message: Considering this game is now called "Dark Millennium Online", the article should be renamed accordingly. Leo•Natan 21:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article renaming
Talk:Turning Point (2004 wrestling)

message: Rather than engage in a edit war like a certain other editor wants to do, I will bring this up here first. There is no need at all to listed a companies full legal name in the references. For example, we write just "World Wrestling Entertainment" as the publisher, not "World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.". Adding the extra "Inc." adds nothing and just adds unneeded bulk to the article (I know not much and that is not my main reason for opposing it). TJ Spyke 02:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I use the full company name. I like to use the full name. How many times have we discussed this? Either it is Standard match or something else. We are different, I understand that. But if you have a problem with something TJ with-in the article. Tell me first, maybe we can work out a compromise before it comes to this.--WillC 03:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can either of you tell me if this is covered in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide? If it isn't, then we default to the standard MoS on company names. Viriditas (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not, but that thing has been re-written a hundred times.--WillC 20:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Company names
Talk:Sandy Mouche

message: The section dealing with the founding of the band has been lifted straight from the band's own site. I'm gonna take a shot at rewriting it, but someone with more knowledge of the band should probably step in and look it over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.73.127.102 (talk • contribs) 
* Anything that is straight copy and paste should be removed, with an note placed in the edit summary when it is done as to why Wikipedia:Copyright violations.   Jeepday (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite needed!

message: I have de-prodded this article.  Their most recent album got some coverage in :Sydsvenskan, which is a respectable regional newspaper.  A search in the Swedish newspaper archives is giving me a plenty of historical hits, some in regional and national papers as well as the expected slew of local freesheets - I'm not sure that I have access to most of the articles beyond a snippet view, though.  I think that what I can see might be enough to satisfy the GNG so if the article is to be deleted it should be discussed at AFD first.  I agree with you that it's currently in very poor shape; I'll do what I can to improve it if I have time later today.  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 10:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD
Talk:Region (disambiguation)

message: Copy of comments made at Rich257's talk page.
Hey, Rich, I truly understand your point on this dab page, but let me explain why I created it, before we decide what to do with it.  I had gone to the article Region, and found that it looked like this.  I don't know about you, but the top of that page looks hideous to me.  My first thought was, "Is it really necessary to provide clarifiers for those things?  I mean, maybe the Tolkien thing, since it's actually called "Region", but the bank?  And the Amtrak line I thought was ridiculous.  So I was considering deleting all of them,, but rather than step on someone's toes (those ostensible dab links may have been capriciously created, however it's conceivable that they might actually have been created as a result of someone's experience), I decided to chunk them all onto an actual dab page.
So here's where I'm at:  I don't want for Region to return to the condition it was.  Nonetheless, I could live without the dab page, if, after you've heard all this, you've decided it needs to go anyway.  The only thing is, someone out there thinks that some type of disambig help is needed with these terms.  Not me; probably not you.  I'm going to remove the prod, but if you want to put it back, I won't remove it a second time.  Cheers.  Unschool (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Defense Data Network

message: As I recall, the DDN moniker was used to include all networks funded by the defense department, that is, ARPANET as well as MILNET. The clone for military use only was MILNET. Generally, during Republican administrations, it was necessary to put the word "Defense" in proposals to get funding. When Democrats were in power, you needed to take the word out. The ARPA->DARPA->ARPA->DARPA name swap is another example. 
Will try to grab some sources and fix to be accurate.  W Nowicki (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading
Talk:Kunstmuseum

message: I cannot understand why the German terms Kunstmuseum and Kunstverein were merged in English-WP from the beginning - for every German speaking art historian it is absolutely clear that Museum and Verein are separated by history. Therefore, please reconsider your personal point of view, before taking it as general knowledge. --rpd (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, the terms are quite unrelated, a Kunstverein is an organization, a group of people, that can run a gallery or museum or whatever (E-Kartoffel (talk) 18:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To solve the problem I changed the page into a Disambiguation page that defines the term and has is its own content, and also created seperate pages on Kunstmuseum and Kunsthalle, so that someone searching for this stuff can A) find it and B) tell the difference. -- Ultracobalt  (talk) 22:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry
Talk:Leonard W. Riches

message: "In generic use, apply lower case for words such as president, king, and emperor (De Gaulle was a French president)."  The general rule is "when in doubt, leave it out". He is "President De Gaulle" or "De Gaulle, the French president". You have the MoS rule backward. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 03:05, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musical Theatre/Categories

message: Working with these categories, I have to say that I think the "Musicals by nationality" is pretty useless.  Deciding whether some of these shows are British or American relies entirely upon a judgment call.  As we already have "Musicals by year", I'm thinking this is a pretty bad way to organize things, and, ultimately, it's just organization for organization sake.  Thoughts?  
And, btw, I think we should probably decide what makes a musical belong to one year and not another.  I think we need to say that a musical is dated from whenever it was first presented in a tangible form, whether that was a stage production or a recording of some sort.  For instance, I think Tommy should be considered a 1969 musical, not a 1993 musical.  If a show was presented in Wichita in 1984, then on Broadway in 1997, it's still a 1984 musical.  If it fell apart during tryouts in Boston and Philly, it still dates from whatever year the production started.  I was going through and finding some shows in two categories, which makes no sense at all.  If a show's first run on B-way is 1974 and it gets a revival in 2005, it should be in the '74 category and not the '05 category.  —  MusicMaker5376 04:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with everything you say there MusicMaker...Mark E 17:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  I know SSilvers agreed, at least, with deleting those categories -- we were talking about it on my talk page (which has since been archived).  I'll nominate them for deletion if no one objects when I've finished going through them putting on infoboxes.  I started with the various categories, so if we could just leave them as they are until I'm done, I'd appreciate it.  —  MusicMaker5376 05:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I sort-of agree with your sentiments on dating. I think shows which came to Broadway should be dated to the year they were first Tony-eligible; that's how most theatre people are going to think of them, and where they will likely look first. Anything which never MADE it to Broadway should be dated by its first media appearance. My 2¢. -DrGaellon (talk | contribs) 23:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to say that I think you're approaching it backward.  I don't think people are going to pull up the category to find a particular musical, they're just going to pull up the article for that musical.  I think that if someone goes to the category to research musicals of 1969, we'd be doing them a disservice if Tommy's not in that category.  (I hate to keep using that example, but it's the only one I can think of....) I think musicals are a product of the times in which they were written, not necessarily of when they were produced.  —  MusicMaker5376 00:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:British Motor Corporation (Australia)

message: You refer to this as an 'Australia-only' model - but that's not really true.  There were Morris Mini Deluxe's (and Austin Mini Deluxe's) made in the UK too - I happen to own one - so I know this for sure!  The difference between the standard Mini and the Deluxe were pretty minimal in the UK and certainly there were many differences between the Australian Deluxe and the UK deluxe - but there were differences from year-to-year and from factory-to-factory throughout the Mini's life.  I think it goes a bit far to describe it as a different model. SteveBaker (talk) 22:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Morris Mini Deluxe
Category talk:Presidents of the American Statistical Association

message: For the time being, I have made this a subcategory of :Category:American statisticians, much as :Category:Presidents of the Royal Statistical Society is a subcategory of :Category:British statisticians. However, this may be inappropriate as former president Robert H. Coats belongs to :Category:Canadian statisticians so I would not object to removing the subcategorization. Btyner (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Standard Fireworks

message: This whole article now reads like a promotional advert, with many biased and unsourced comments, all in favour of Standard Fireworks.Wizlop (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Standard fireworks has long since changed to Black Cat. The website link does not work.
Standard Fireworks actually refers to a company in Sivakasi, India. Their website link is  http://standardfireworks.net/. They are the "world's largest pyrotechnic company" according to this article.
The British Firework Company information should be shifted to under Black Cat Fireworks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.6 (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated information
Talk:James L. Clark

message: These webpages have more content to be added:
*Peabody Museum webpage 
*Wildlife Art Museum Oceanflynn (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references on Clark 

message: Carl Akeley
* Field Museum
*[Arthur Radclyffe Dugmore re: Dugmore/Clark photo safariOceanflynn (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilinks to be developed
Talk:Unit load

message: The use of a standard does not suggest that a unit load design is correct. Standards are only useful if they are the correct standard for the specific circumstances and if they are written properly.  Many standards are very useful and many others are useless. It is nice to meet a standard but more important to have a good and useful unit load system.
Please do not delete positive contributions to this article. 
Rlsheehan (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Standards

message: unit load link in article does not work. Peter Horn 15:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I goofed up. Peter Horn 15:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link does not work
Talk:The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific

message: I'm getting all of this informationfrom my PS2 version of the game so I can't verify alot of this stuff. The PS2 version dosen't include multiplayer or an online option so I just wanted to know if someone could verify the game modes. Also there aren't many sources out there that can verify this information. I know IGN reviewed it but thats all.
BjmanTalk 22:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Stillwell

message: The following was removed as it is no longer verifiable:
::Winner of the 2009 Alpha Sigma Nu Book Award ref: 
:Awarded by Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities
When the fraternity re-establishes a "past winners" link, the ASN book award may again be placed in the article. — Rgdboer (talk) 02:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASN book award
Talk:Isle of Ely

message: I have reinstated the form "an historic" for the simple reason that the "authority" cited for changing this to read "a historic" is itself written in dropout English (here). It for instance uses "was" as a past subjunctive form (correct: were). There is sufficient precedence – going back centuries, for Pete's sake – to justify the use of "an historic", and since that was the original usage, I have reverted this "correction". Kelisi (talk) 20:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  >Usage
Talk:Florian Hecker

message: Florian Hecker deserves a better article.  This page is filled with uncited statements and is terribly written.  It also seems like nobody has thought about editing this since it was written.  Why so much negligence?  Hecker's work is important.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:4B82:8ED0:7D71:F2CD:28C5:D876 (talk) 03:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This page sucks

message: Wouldn't it be more logical - and clear - to use Florian Hecker as the title of the page? There is at least one other electronic musician named Hecker (Tim Hecker), so that's opening the door to mistakes. See Hecker disambiguation page. --H9x (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title: Hecker (musician) or Florian Hecker ?

message: Who is Florian Hecker? The first sentence won't say.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.50.204.15 (talk) 10:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Not characterized
Talk:Atrophin 1

message: This article did not have much information in the introduction so I added a few more sentences summarizing its function, where it can be found, and what gene it is encoded by. I also moved the information provided under different headings so it was more organized. I added the subheading Function. There is not much to be found as a definite function, but it is agreed that the main function would be to act as a transcriptional corepressor. I added more information on how Atrophin-1 mutates and and the main disease that it is associated with (DRPLA). The edits I made are bolded. 
The function of Atrophin-1 has not yet been determined.[4] There is evidence provided by studies of Atrophin-1 in animals to suggest it acts as a transcriptional co-repressor.[4] Atrophin-1 can be found in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of neurons.[4]
Contents  [hide] 
1	Function
2	Clinical significance
3	Interactions
4	References
5	Further reading
6	External links
Function[edit | edit source]
The function of Atrophin-1 have not been defined yet. It is widely hypothesized that Atrophin-1 functions as a transcriptional co-repressor.[5] A transcriptional co-repressor is a protein that indirectly suppresses the activity of specific genes by interacting with DNA-binding proteins.[5]'''
Clinical significance[edit | edit source]
The ATN1 gene has a segment of DNA called the CAG trinucleotide repeat.[5] It is made up of cytosine, adenine, and guanine, and repeats multiple times.[5] The number of CAG repeats in the ATN1 gene in a healthy person will range from six to thirty-five[5] Studies conducted have supported the idea that mutated Atrophin-1 gathers in neurons and disrupts functions of cells.[5]
Mutations in ATN1 are associated with a form of trinucleotide repeat disorder known as "dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy" or "dentatorubropallidoluysian atrophy".The disorder is related to the expansion of a trinucleotide repeat within this gene. The symptoms of this disorder can credited to the significant reduction of brain and spinal tissue observed in those afflicted with "dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy".[6] There are juvenille-onset and late adult-onsets disorders of "dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy" that have differing degrees of severity in certain symptoms.[6]Ewells2013 (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Eugene Milone

message: Milone is one of two former students of Jan Schilt to hve been honored by having an asteroid nmed for him.  Schilt has asteroid 2808, and Schilt's former professor, Jacobus Kapteyn has asteroid 818 kapteynia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.74.11 (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Asteroid
Talk:Arthur Hoag

message: "He was the son of Harvard Medical School, Cornell, and University of Michigan faculty member Lynne Arthur Hoag and wife Wylma Wood Hoag. "
There has to be a better way of saying that. I'ma trying to find one --Gargletheape (talk) 06:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: Hey everyone, it seems like Arthur Hoag's article needs some love so I'm going to start adding to and rewriting this page.  This will be my primary work in my sandbox, feel free to stop by on my talk page if you have any advice.
TouchMeTwice (talk) 19:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting article
Talk:Badnjak (Serbian)

message: There is suggestion that name of Polish god of underworld Nyja is related to badnjak so I added to 'see also'. Sławobóg (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niya
Talk:List of past sumo wrestlers

message: It seemed efficacious to be able to sort this list by ranks, so I devised a system to keep the sorting script from simply sorting alphabetically.  For the list to sort wrestlers by their ranks top/down, I devised the following, revised, system:
Put the following code before the rank name in the rank column:
:X
The X needs to be replaced by a number corresponding to the rank:
:Yokozuna = a
:Ozeki = b
:Sekiwake = c
:Komusubi = d
:Maegashira #1-#9 = e
:Maegashira #10 and up = f
:Juryo #1-#9 = g0
:Juryo #10 and up = g1
:Makushita = h
:Sandanme = i
:Jonidan = j
:Jonokuchi = k
Makushita downwards wrestlers have a lot of wrestlers and in order to be sorted correctly they would need even more numbers following them: i.e. Makushita #20-29 = g2, Jonidan #40-49 = i4,  etc.  I have sorted this way for the few Makushita wrestlers listed, though this is largely overkill unless a lot more lower ranked wrestlers are added, which is unlikely. FourTildes (talk) 04:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: (Revised) Rank sorting system
Talk:The Sunday Times

message: The text has the paper founded 1822 (or 1821), but the infobox and categories have 1864. Any idea why? Dsp13 (talk) 23:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Founded when?

message: It seems centre-right to me.  Apparently it was centre a few decades ago. 86.178.229.129 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Centre?

message: It's been discontinued as of June 2010.  Scottish edition now contains some Scots-related articles in In Gear (motoring), Money, Home (property) and Business but the Scot version is more or less the same as the main (southern) version.  In October or November the UK retail price increased to £2.20 and some large retailers briefly stopped carrying the paper (Asda, for example).  No mention of the Sunday Times iPad app either? (launched Dec 12th) 94.195.120.144 (talk) 18:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecosse has been discontinued, price rise to £2.20, new ipad app

message: I am looking for confirmation of the existence and title of an article that was published in The Sunday Times Magazine a a few years ago (not sure the exact year), written by A. A. Gill and concerning Cornwall and or Cornish people, that I may wish to use as a source for a wikipedia article about attitudes to Cornish people. Where might one find an index of previous article titles etc. for this publication? Govynn (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article by A A Gill in the Sunday Times Magazine some years ago 

message: Can we go with broadsheet for consistency and impartiality? Beingsshepherd (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "quality"? 

message: According to British Political Facts by Butler, the Sunday edition uses You Gov while the weekday uses Populus.  Libraryloser (talk) 14:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political polling supplier
Talk:David Hillis

message: This is also the name of a Lt Gov. of Indiana. He currently has no article- FYI. Charles Edward 15:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig
Talk:J. Willis Stovall

message: ive discovered a very old skull in bridge creek that is either an old bear skull or an ald wolf skull..
It's 9 inches wide and I can't imagine animals that large living around here with people.
The patena tells me it predates people in the area.
Robert Humphries 405-403-4389 68.235.146.155 (talk) 16:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old skull