lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Museum of the Moving Image, London

message: Considering that it is now 10 years since the Museum of the Moving Image in London last existed, while its contemporary of the same
name in New York is still alive and well and expanding, I suggest that the New York museum is now the more notable of the two and
therefore the article title Museum of the Moving Image should be transferred to that museum.  The page for the London museum
can become Museum of the Moving Image (London).  (I am posting the same suggestion on the talk page for
Museum of the Moving Image (New York City), with discussion directed here.) --70.48.232.108 (talk) 09:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's wrong to let the defunct London one hog the page title. The NY one might be more notable, but I'm not sure how we would know; and the London MOMI certainly remains well-known and might get looked up reasonably often too. (I note in passing that the NY one is not currently open.) I agree that a change is due; I wonder what would be the effect of making the name alone a disambiguation page, with links to the NY and London flavours? We do this in plenty of other places - might it work here? I'm not strongly committed to this idea - it's just a thought. DBaK (talk) 10:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that would've been an appropriate change when they were both open, but as it stands I prefer my proposal. (Above, posted from 70.48.232.108) --70.48.232.51 (talk) 19:19, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice that we reached such a thorough consensus before someone else did it! :) DBaK (talk) 10:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to rename the article 

message: There is a presumably new attraction nearby at County Hall called the Movieum of London. Reviews seem generally poor, but I think that near where it says "London still has no publicly funded film museum", the Movieum should probably get a mention.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjmunro (talk • contribs) 10:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movieum of London 

message: There was a stunning clip-show movie being run on large screens inside the museum, apparently called "Precious moments" containing brief scenes from hundreds of famous films. Any idea if a copy still exists? Zagubov (talk) 20:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clips Movie
Talk:Peruvian passport

message: CAN SOMEONE POST A MAP OF PERUVIAN VISA FREE ACCESS? ARE PERUVIANS NOT ALLOWED IN EUROPE W/OUT A VISA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.215.251 (talk) 21:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mattituck-Cutchogue Union Free School District

message: What happened?? Why isn't it going to normal Wikipedia format??
Tenorikuma 12:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Format Problem
Talk:Union Jack Club

message: In paragraph 3 under this heading, the following appears: "The Prince of Wales laid the foundation stone of the club in July 1904[2]:135 and later as King Edward VII ..." Queen Victoria died on 22 January 1901, at which time the then Prince of Wales became King Edward VII, so he was already King Edward VII in July 1904. Suggest a rewording of this sentence, such as: "The foundation stone of the club was laid by King Edward VII in July 1904[2]:135 and later, together with Queen Alexandra, he officially opened the club in July 1907.[2]:91"Haynesta (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! The source says only "Prince of Wales", so I'd guess it must be referring to George V. I've . See if you think it's right now. Ibadibam (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Looks fine now but I might have reversed the second clause, i.e. "... and the club was officially opened in July 1907 by King Edward VII together with Queen Alexandra." My reasoning was a little out of kilter as I assumed you were suggesting that the same person had completed both tasks but with different titles. However, Edward VII's son was created Prince of Wales on 9 November 1901 and became King George V on 6 May 1910.Haynesta (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I had made that assumption as well, until I checked the source. So Prince George laid the cornerstone, and King Edward opened the club, right? And are you suggesting we put the second clause in the passive voice? To put emphasis on the event over its participants? Ibadibam (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Yume no Crayon Oukoku

message: Where do the Fallen angels fit in?Andycjp (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They appear in the first episode of the second season when Punya releases them from some sort of clock and they become the primary antagonists.Kesuke (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Showstash

message: Warfwar3 14:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is the proof that it was taken down by the MPAA?  It could have gone down for a number of reasons. - 67.166.139.181 06:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be rewritten in the past tense in showstash is gone
Talk:Battersea Dogs & Cats Home

message: Hi - added a POV tag as the opening copy reads like an advertising pamphlet - needs to be re-written from a neutral POV. Body of article could do with significant additional details and research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.153.99 (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality tag 

message: I noticed on Trustpilot (https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/battersea.org.uk) that it has scathing reviews, with an average of just 1.7. I was considering adding a "Controversy" subsection to the article but considering it looks like the marketing arm of the charity police their Wikipedia page quite vigorously (judging from the comments here) I am wondering whether it's worth doing as it will just get deleted. Is it worth doing, and is Trustpilot an unreliable source on Wikipedia, as I don't want to waste my time if it is. Thank you! Tris2000 (talk) 21:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should a "Controversy" subsection be added?
Talk:Gevgelija

message: Why are those removed? ForeignerFromTheEast 03:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names in other languages
Talk:BTRON

message: The reference article mentions that the Matsushita computer could display color video "in a separate window". This is not at all the same as "video in multiple windows", as the article said, so I have corrected that. If anyone can provide more accurate references on its exact video capabilities, please do so. 79.3.245.52 13:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video capabilities of the Matsushita PC
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Romani people

message: Hi. Could you please have a look at Talk:Ashkali and Balkan Egyptians#Association with the Roma and provide a comment? Thank you. --TadejM my talk 09:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Ashkali and Balkan Eygptians

message: Could editors with expertise on Romani history please have a look at Gypsy (Rajput clan)? There appears to be a lot of synthesis and fringe opinion in the article. Thanks. Uncle Spock (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gypsy (Rajput clan) 

message: Are the Lom and Dom peoples under the purview of WikiProject Romani? Is there a collective term for Rom/Lom/Dom people other than the dated "Gypsies"? A number of articles and categories on Wikipedia for Dom and Lom people describe them, categorize them, or tag their talk pages as "Romani", but that isn't quite accurate. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Lom, Dom, and Rom
Talk:Markko Rivera

message: how coul he be Sonny Corinthos and Lily Corinthos's child? Lily had died when she was pregnant with Sonny's son. Skye Tyler 
He's not their son.Skye Tyler 01:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Evidence Markko is related to GH's Sonny and Lily
Talk:Gigi Morasco

message: i feel that the information is relevant to the article as several other articles which include Kendall Hart Jason Morgan etc. if we could find a good source (i dont know what is or not) i think we should add the info to the article as seen on rule number 2 here
'A lead paragraph which indicates the name of the character, when it originated, current or last portrayer and a very brief summary of the other material in the article. A good lead encapsulates the entire article in a couple paragraphs. 
'
BigPadresDude 04:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I do appreciate your efforts, and you're right that a section on casting is helpful. The thing is, the "messiness" of what you added greatly outweighed its value to the article. I don't have much time this weekend, but I promise that I will make an attempt to take your casting info and add it to this article in what I think is the best way. I'm hoping that it will serve as a good example for you as you learn here, as your enthusiasm for soap-opera articles is encouraging.— TAnthonyTalk 19:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casting section 

message: Could we possibly get a re-write that WASN'T copied from a soap opera magazine?  The exclamation marks do not belong in a Wiki entry.173.49.7.199 (talk) 19:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation
Talk:Pressurized Mating Adapter

message: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/astronaut-perform-first-post-shuttle-spacewalk-iss/
--Craigboy (talk) 14:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PMA-2 and PMA-3 current have covers 
Talk:Heir Hunters

message: The title card for the 2008 series spells 'Heir Hunters' as 'H£eir Hunters' - using the pound sterling sign as an E.
:I hadn't noticed that but if it is the case then shouldn't it read "H£ir Hunters" in the line above?  --jmb (talk) 09:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On screen as"H£IR HUNT£RS".--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Several other firms (apart from Finders, Hoopers and Fraser & Fraser) have been featured so it is misleading to mention them alone in the article. Finders and Fraser's are large firms but some of the others are just one or two individuals working alone. Migration and exile mean that there is an international dimension to the problem in some cases which means collaborating with researchers who do this work in other countries.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Probate research firms
Talk:Berkeley Square

message: By reputation the Berkeleys were said to be able to ride from Berkeley Castle to Berkeley Square staying on their own land all the way, and to do so once a year.  Was this ever true?? Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 16:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Berkeley to Berkeley Square

message: The square has many occupants in the Private Equity and specialist boutique banking sector.   I think a section about this would be beneficial on this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.149.60 (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Equity
Talk:Status lists of players in professional sports

message: I moved the page again to something that does have "list of lists" in the title. Kwsn(Ni!) 15:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: Is it really necessary to link to "grief" for the bereavement list..?  Seems like someone got carried away..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.223.2.207 (talk) 01:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLB Wiki Links
Talk:Israel Exploration Journal

message: A note for whoever added the PROD tag. Good on you for your work in keeping Wiki tidy. Regarding this article, HANG ON.
Please note that this stub was added to the WikiProject Academic Journals by someone other than me, who opened the article. Please also note that Wiki has a long list of thousands of Journals that do not have any article. IEJ is a well known journal to academics who work in the area. It is peer-reviewed and hence what it publishes are considered reliable sources by Wiki. To make such sources accessable to lay readers, it is helpful to have articles that specify things like the frequency of journals, the organization that publishes them, the editorial committee, the year they were first published, any geographic, political or sectarian affiliation and so on. Ideally, a list of all articles published by date (often available from websites) can also be included.
Currently, I am slowly working at a long term project of providing a list of the hundred or so most cited theological and related journals. That happens to be my personal area of research. I am sourcing these from WorldCat and providing ISSNs for them. A few other editors have expressed interest and have been helping provide info boxes and such like for various articles.
Because journal articles are a key component in verifying information at Wiki, we need all the information about them we can get. It requires volunteer time from editors. The more structure we can provide, the more we motivate contributions.
Since this particular article has been "prodded", I'll put in an info box and more info. However, I simply do not have time to do this for all the stubs I have created and intend to create. It is an achievable goal for me to put lists and stubs in place to motivate others to contribute, especially those who deal more regularly with particular journals than I do. If all the article stubs I create are prodded, most will be deleted, and then the list I've been building will look sketchy. That list may then get proposed for deletion. Simply because there are so many theological journals, but so few people contributing articles on them, even the little we have will get deleted -- very demotivating for anyone who may want to try working it up from scratch again.
In short, IEJ is a particularly well known journal to scholars in the field. It already has context at Wiki -- the publishing society, the list of theological journals, and citations at a few articles.
Look at the skyline of a big city CBD, most of them look "messy" because skyscrapers take years to build. The bigger the project, the longer it takes, and it looks ugly while under construction. How much more so big Wiki projects depending on the contributions of volunteers! If there are proceedures at Wiki for setting up project pages etc, etc that I should know about, please point me in that direction. I will get around to dropping in on the Academic Journal WikiProject. Perhaps they would be happy to support a small, slow moving work group covering theological journals.
Cheers. Alastair Haines 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re PROD tag
Talk:Leinster Senior League (association football)

message: I have added some history, general info. Added templates for top five divisions. Removed lists of junior league teams, most are either reserve teams of those in top five or they are not especially notable. Plus they were out of date. Not notable enough to keep updating. DjlnDjln (talk) 13:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: This article has two sections named "Saturday Leagues" that each contain similar but different categories. These sections should be improved to avoid confusion, and updated to reflect the current distribution of teams amongst the various leagues. Tridek Sep (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve league lists 

message: Most clubs listed in this article are not notable, especially in the lower divisions. They should never have articles, so the existing red wikilinks should be removed. The automatic reflex of adding wikilinks to every element in a list is bad practice; adding a link is tantamount to saying "this topic ought to have an article: somebody please create one". jnestorius(talk) 18:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks 
Talk:Adaptive behavior

message: Mirandannhunter (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

message: The context of “adaptive” here is based within the psychology field. Whilst this ties in with the content/context of the text within the adaptive behavior section there are many more adaptive fields: data communications, manufacturing, gambling, medical, biological etc.
I’m in the process of writing a draft to support a doctorate on adaptive/cognitive network technologies and from my standpoint this word is too big a subject to “fit” solely within this single field
Doug — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.19.88.34 (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Within psychology

message: What do you think it should include? Josh.Pritchard.DBA (talk) 19:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How should it be divied up then?
Talk:Yaba

message: The German Wikipedia makes the claim that is also supported by this assertion here on the disambiguation page: "Yet Another Bloody Acronym, see TLA" -- but what does TLA have to do with YABA?  If the assertion is true, it should be possible to make an interwik link, but linking to the disambiguation page is not a very elegant solution.  Any suggestions?--Bhuck 14:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Go!Cam

message: All the Go!Edit links are dead. Does someone have new ones or should we just remove them? Tk (talk) 14:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spotted Saddle Horse

message: The Spotted Saddle Horse does not have an Appaloosa coloring but more a paint horse coloring. Searching Spotted Saddle Horse in Google images will confirm this. Yamenah 03:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good reason to look for public domain images or ask people to contribute some!  My error, I confused with both Tiger Horse and Colorado Ranger, probably.  Still think the leopard-spotted gaited horses may benefit from being combined, though some research probably has to happen first...those 10 people who care probably care A LOT (sigh).  OK to toss merge tag here and fix it elsewhere... Montanabw 18:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Here are some different-looking pictures to maybe go in history in place of the one that looked too much like the others. 
I wish there was a picture of a really flashy-colored one on Commons. In the state above me there's a really famous SSH stud who is buckskin tobiano. A picture of one like him would really do a lot. White Arabian mare (Neigh) 20:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The grazing image is not good at all, bad angle and horse is standing on a hill.  The other one is a nice horse and I think it's OK to add that one!  Montanabw(talk) 14:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different picures 

message: I have started an article about the SSHBEA in userspace and came across a newspaper article from a year or two back that says the shoeing rules are now different from what's recorded here-evidently they have changed them in the meantime. They don't allow pads or chains at all now, only somewhat weighted shoes (not sure about shoe bands). Is it ok to add that here with the citation? White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 02:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In a perfect world, you find the current rulebook and cite to it... is it online?  Montanabw(talk) 09:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to check. The SSHBEA seems to be redoing their website, so it may be up soon if it's not already there. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 19:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related article and shoeing regulations
Talk:USB FlashCard

message: I guess we can just pretend PQI didn't already essentially do this with their iStick.  http://www.pqi.com.tw/product.asp?cate1=3—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.242.93.10 (talk • contribs) 10:35, June 19, 2007
:Certainly, the iStick is a very small USB flash drive.  But it isn't explicitly designed for use in portable devices like cameras, phones, MP3 players.  That's the interesting thing about the USB FlashCard! MOXFYRE (contrib) 17:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Rob Barraco

message: The entire page reads like a brochure. I strongly suspect it is copyright violation. I removed the most obvious examples, and then left more for others to decide. Whoever wrote this, says Barraco joined Chris Robinson's New Earth Mud.  That's impossible, given there is no band by the name (but there IS an album); which tells me someone is trying to change a few words here and there. Please review the article and see if it needs re-writing. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 04:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with article
Talk:List of members of the Chamber of Representatives of Belgium, 2014–2019

message: Considering Michel Daerden has been dead since 2012, surely this list cannot be updated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8C0:9E04:500:9905:C0E4:E12A:EE59 (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

message: Should "Fraction" be "Faction"? or is this a special term?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fraction"?
Talk:Kenichiro Fukui

message: He's had his name and picture removed from Square-Enix's Composers/Arrangers page.
http://www.square-enix.co.jp/music/sem/page/cm/profile/
Does this mean he's left the company? Xenofan 29A (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Potassium hydride

message: Possibly state the relative or exact amount of energy released? Would be worthwhile to mention. Mamyles (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delta H? 

message: Reads poorly.
In one study the compound is dispersed in paraffin to allow for better dispensing.[3]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taliska (talk • contribs) 23:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed is to was, for a quick fix. Further suggestions are welcome. Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest sentence needs revising 

message: It does not seems likely that hydride would deprotonate an amine into an amide, where would the oxygen come from? I could imagine that it would convert an amide ito an amine but wouldn't this be reduction (that might or might not involve a deprotonation)?150.227.15.253 (talk) 10:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well its the usual problem, the definitions.  Amide can mean RC(O)NH2-like thing or a deprotonated amine such as KNHR.  The nomenclature is terrible but entrenched. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactions
Talk:Pitons (Saint Lucia)

message: The 2016 merge proposal seems straightword given that Gros Piton and Petit Piton are so close; each could have a separate section in the Pitons page. Klbrain (talk) 21:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pitons →  – No clear primary topic per WP:PLURALPT on most days the tool gets more views than the volcano[]. Google and Images are split between the mountains and tool while Books appears to mainly return the tool. The tool is also likely primary by long-term significance. Redirect back to Piton (disambiguation). Crouch, Swale (talk)  16:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 August 2022
Talk:Eco-criticism

message: 'See also: ecocriticism'
Er.. wtf? They're the same thing with a dash in the middle! The article even lists two references with either spelling! This page shouldn't exist.
:Yeah, they're the same thing. When I'm not super-busy with midterms and, ironically, this paper I'm writing on ecocriticism, I'll sort this out, unless someone else gets to it first. Random89 19:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with ecocriticism?