Talk:Personal software process

message: Advantage of Personal Software Process over  extreme programming
Is there any connection between this PSP (Personal Software Process) and TSP (Team Software Process)?Face 13:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. Considering companies who have high quality standards such as Microsoft ship complex software with literally hundreds of uncovered bugs, we can almost conclude that the statement is a shameless self promotion, or a word play on the definition of "defect", or both.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.243.169.73 (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

text: I have yet to find a software process that can even reliably determine whether a software system contains defects. How was this metric even determined? The PSP book is peppered with marketing-speak claims like this with no real citations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ansciath (talk • contribs) 21:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

text: I've been learning and using PSP and the claim that "2/3 of the projects shipped were without any defects" most probably means that there were no defects found in the testing phase. PSP attempts to find the bugs you introduce into your software early by having phases such as Design Review and Code Review in an effort to prevent bugs from getting to the testing phase.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haxhia (talk • contribs) 11:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I have had some experience with persons who work with PSP, and their definition is somewhat different from the idea that there are no defects in the code, literally.  Rather, they define "defect free" as meaning that the customer did not report any defects.  So, from the customer's perspective, the product was "defect free".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuadw (talk • contribs) 17:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Still, Microsoft updates everyday patches, updates... most of them only to correct bugs that were mostly discovered by customer! so even the last definition let me doubt that 2/3 of the projets were "defect free".  Maybe 2/3 of the functionnalities, maybee --80.254.148.59 (talk) 12:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

text: There is no reason to believe that Microsoft (Redmond) uses PSP merely because Microsoft (India) reports great success with it.  To determine whether the statement about 2/3 of the projects being defect-free is accurate you need to find out what projects were delivered by Microsoft (India).
Danfranklinusa (talk) 03:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Personal software process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129020408/http://seicertification.clearmodel.com/get-certified/software-development/become-an-sei-certified-psp-developer/sei-certified-psp-developer-frequently-asked-questions/ to http://seicertification.clearmodel.com/get-certified/software-development/become-an-sei-certified-psp-developer/sei-certified-psp-developer-frequently-asked-questions/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified