Talk:Veľká Fatra

message: Given the recent number of moves of this page, I am reluctant to fall back on the rather unsatisfactory "no consensus" outcome. Several other page moves are related to this one, and are likely to follow the outcome of this discussion. I emplore all those concerned to discuss the issues calmly and to try to come to an agreement. I have, accordingly, relisted this move at WP:RM to allow more time. --Stemonitis 16:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 05:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: It's like the above discussion never happened and  keeps ignoring that the Slovak name is also widely used by English speakers and thus should be in bold according to Wikipedia's guidelines.For the last time: this is not just a native name (which are normally in italics); this is an alternate name used in English (thus bold).--Svetovid 15:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The native name is always put in italics, that's a Wikipedia standard. All other Slovak locations are formatted that way. All native names of places all around the world are sometimes (sometimes frequently) used in English texts. – Caroig (talk) 16:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the above discussion because you forgot what was written apparently."The native name is always put in italics, that's a Wikipedia standard."->wrong indeed, see all articles linked about; if native names are widely used they are, of course, in bold (1 example for all Côte d'Ivoire)"All other Slovak locations are formatted that way."-> wrong, see e.g. Slovak Ore Mountains, Veľký Rozsutec, Záhorie, and to have a laugh, articles YOU started with native names in bold: Ploská, Ostrá, Borišov. Yes, I know there are no English alternatives for some of the names, but that is my very point. If a native name is used in English, it's in bold."All native names of places all around the world are sometimes (sometimes frequently) used in English texts." And if they are used frequently, they need to be in bold (and they may be articles' names too).--Svetovid 22:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous discussion has nothing to do with that. If you look at all those links you provided (as well as any other), the local name is also the article name thus it's in bold. However, if the article is placed under the English name of the location, the native name is quoted after it in italics, that's the  standard I was talking about. Examples? Venice, Moscow, Blue Nile, Alps, Lisbon, High Tatras. Is there any examples of the formatting proposed by yourself? – Caroig (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's all according to Wikipedia's guidelines.--Svetovid 11:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Venice, Moscow, Blue Nile, Alps, Lisbon, High Tatras as well as all other non-English localities use the same formatting, thus it is obvisously in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, not the formatting suggested by yourself. So please respect the guidelines too. – Caroig (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Slovak name should be in bold indeed

message: See Talk:Lesser Fatra#Move? If that page were to move, presumably this one would move too. Feel free to comment in that discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Move made for both pages following Requested move discussion at Talk:Lesser Fatra#Move?.  Skinsmoke (talk) 06:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related move proposal