lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hong Kong Film Award

message: why is there gaps in the numbers of the list? are there some missing? Catherine breillat 12:32, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is this list coming from? in which year was it established? olivier 21:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: List temporarily removed, until further verification. I'm also considering moving it to a "Categories of Hong Kong Film Awards", which I have yet to create. --Plastictv 06:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't the list at  enough? Still, it is better to link to it than duplicate the list here. By categories I think you mean lists, and I'm not sure every award is notable enough for a list. –Pomte 08:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, by "Categories" i mean a prose with introductions and lists of the major awards. --Plastictv 10:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The current page is virtually a cut and paste from the official HKFA website. As i noted, this is a work in progress. Please be patient while i try to put everything in place. But since you object, i'd respect your opinion and retain the lists of films while changes are being made. --Plastictv 20:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Best 100 Chinese Motion Pictures

message: Not sure if this information is useful.
*Twenty-ninth Hong Kong Film Awards Presentation Ceremony Special Edition (Cover 1)
http://www.yesasia.com/us/%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E5%8D%81%E4%B9%9D%E5%B1%8A%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E7%94%B5%E5%BD%B1%E9%87%91%E5%83%8F%E5%A5%96%E9%A2%81%E5%A5%96%E5%85%B8%E7%A4%BC%E7%89%B9%E5%88%8A-cover-1/1022494535-0-0-0-zh_CN/info.html
*Twenty-ninth Hong Kong Film Awards Presentation Ceremony Special Edition (Cover 2)
http://www.yesasia.com/us/%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E5%8D%81%E4%B9%9D%E5%B1%8A%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E7%94%B5%E5%BD%B1%E9%87%91%E5%83%8F%E5%A5%96%E9%A2%81%E5%A5%96%E5%85%B8%E7%A4%BC%E7%89%B9%E5%88%8A-cover-2/1022494540-0-0-0-zh_CN/info.html
*12,13,14 The first Hong Kong Film Awards Presentation Ceremony (US Version) 
http://www.yesasia.com/us/%E7%AC%AC12-13-14-%E5%B1%8A%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E7%94%B5%E5%BD%B1%E9%87%91%E5%83%8F%E5%A5%96%E9%A2%81%E5%A5%96%E5%85%B8%E7%A4%BC-%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E7%89%88/1004485736-0-0-0-zh_CN/info.html
*14th Hong Kong Film Awards Presentation Ceremony (US Version) 
http://www.yesasia.com/us/14th-hong-kong-film-awards-presentation-ceremony-us-version/1004081632-0-0-0-en/info.html
Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVDs
Talk:Mangle (machine)

message: I think this should be the main article placed at "mangle" with the other (maginal) use being discussed in a disambiguation page. Is that unreasonable? Birdseed 13:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not unreasonable. Zora 13:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Changed. Also rewrote. Hope this is considered an improvement. Zora 07:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: I've lived all my life on the mid-Atlantic coast of the USA and I've never heard a mangle called a wringer, ever.  I've seen a half dozen or so in antique shops and every one of them was being sold under the name "mangle".  My father, who grew up in the Chicago area in the 1930s, calls them mangles.  My mother, who grew up near Richmond, calls them mangles.
Seems like a citation is needed.  Who calls them wringers?  Maybe it's a west coast thing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.180.229 (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We call them wringers in TN. who ever heard of a mangle washer? they are wringer washers. RoeB  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.27.147.209 (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone should consult the Dictionary of American Regional English -- I'll wager it will show the usage areas -- rather than trying to cobble a survey together from the folks who've happened to drop by here. Clevelander96 (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. Aside from mangle v.s wringer, the phrase"wringer washer" skews strongly to U.S. usage on nGram; first appearance is c. 1945 though, so a more recent term for sure. Clevelander96 (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wringer isn't a U.S. term- we call 'em mangles around here 

message: It is also known as rotary ironer. 2A02:587:D3E:6C00:91F3:B61A:9A7F:9BCD (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: AKA ''Rotary Ironer''
Talk:Villain of the week

message: Feels like this falls more under the purview of TvTropes, as opposed to Wikipedia. Recommending deletion. 71.34.28.57 (talk) 17:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate for Wikipedia? 

message: This article (without original research) is basically just a dictionary definition, and there don’t seem to be any sources discussing the subject beyond pointing out examples, so there’s no encyclopedic content. Should we make it a soft redirect to Wiktionary? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Wiktionary?
Talk:Pudasjärvi

message: "Pudasjärvi is by area the largest city in Finland and the third-largest in the world, only surpassed by London and Tokyo". Greater London is only 1579 km2 and Tokyo 2187 km2, so I remove this fact. From 1st January 2006 Rovaniemi will be the largest city in Finland. --Tbonefin 13:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Kiruna became a Swedish city in 1948, and was at one time listed as the largest city in the world by area, but after the Swedish municipality reform in the 1970s, the term "city" has been discontinued. Kiruna is today the second largest municipality in the world by area, roughly 20 000 km² after Mount Isa, Queensland, Australia, 42 904 km².MoRsE 15:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fibred category

message: Shouldn't we merge this with the fibration article? Samuel Mimram 13:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, no, that risks a technical mismatch. Charles Matthews 23:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Charles is right. Indeed, these are quite different topics. I'll begin work on fibred categories as soon as feasible, as background for Stack (descent theory). Stca74 15:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ryan Reich fixed the incorrect statement about the 2-cat of E-categories for fixed E being a subcat of the 2-cat of categories, replacing that with the correct statement that it is a subcat of the category of functors (understood in the "bivariant" way - see example 1 in the article). However, this corrected claim may not be that useful in this part of the article - indeed, it should be elaborated to give the definition of the "bivariant" categopry of functors to make sense immediately. Thus, I changed the text to be instead a slightly more explicit definition of the 2-cat structure itself. Stca74 (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2-category of E-categories 

message: By definition a strict 2-category is one enriched over the monoidal category of locally small categories (i.e. over 1-Cat). This means, Hom(a,b) has to be a locally small category. But if for a given category E we consider the category Fib(E), are the categories of morphisms Hom_E(F,G) always locally small, i.e. given two cartesian E-functors f,g: F→G, is the class of natural transformations from f to g always a set? Saurav — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.144.28.85 (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2-category 

message: This article is tagged with a suggestion that grothendieck construction be merged here.  I don't think this is a good idea, since the Grothendieck construction arises in contexts that do not obviously involve all the machinery of fibered categories.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.169.30.99 (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Grothendieck construction 

message: In Examples, "The functor Ob : Cat→Set, sending a category to its set of objects" Shouldn't it refer to Small Categories? ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.34.166 (talk) 05:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Correction? 

message: Shouldn't the definition of fibred categories state that for every morphism with codomain in the range of the projection AND every lift of the codomain there exists an inverse image with codomain the given lift? Right now it is only stated that an inverse image should exist. But there is no guarantee that this inverse image has a given lift as codomain. In particular, the current definition is not equivalent to that of a cloven category. Nmdwolf (talk) 08:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of fibred categories
Talk:Aide

message: There is a link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Source_Tripwire
a security/integrity system claiming aide is also one.
AIDE
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~rammer/aide.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.28.220 (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: What is a senior aide ?. --Nopetro (talk) 11:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senior aide
Talk:Dil Chahta Hai

message: Arthicus (did I spell your username right? Sorry if I didn't!), I reverted your edits to the synopsis, because I didn't think them an improvement. I don't think I'm defending my version, either, because that was recently replaced by a version that I just copyedited. Lots of interest in synopsizing this movie. 
Anyway, I disagree with the characterization of the story as being "non-linear" and "uncharacteristic of Bollywood". Lots of Bollywood movies have flashbacks; it's a standard story technique. Zubeidaa was just about ALL of it flashbacks. As for interweaving three stories -- well, the canonical instance of that is Amar, Akbar, Anthony. 
Plus -- I know it's spoilered but ... the bit re giving the same speech twice, once as pickup line and once heartfelt, is just too neat to ruin by telling readers ahead of time. Do let them discover it for themselves. I may be off-base here, but I think the purpose of the synopsis is to tell just enough so that the reader can decide for him/herself whether or not he/she wants to see the movie. 
Hmmm ... well, when I've had to watch movies without subtitles (and I'm nuts enough to do that!) I do consult synopses to figure out the story. But Dil Chahta Hai has subtitles! <g> 
I don't want to discourage you. There is certainly enough work for editors interested in Bollywood movies or Indian cinema in general. Please forgive me for being picky and keep on editing. Zora 13:40, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seeing that the article is written in English, would it be too much to ask that the quotes include an English translation, in deferrence tonon-Hindi readers? Thanks - BillCJ 23:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: I have tried buying the cd online on various websites, but they don't list 'rockin goa' as a track. However, I feel like I had listened to that song on the cassette when I was in India. If that is not true, and Rocking goa is not even on the music cassette, then the track listing should be removed from the main list, and put under the mention of 'desert rose'.Yashrg 21:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: IT DID NOT GROSS 91 CRORES WORLDWIDE. SOME IDIOTS ARE CLAIMING THAT IT DID. IT EARNED ONLY 26 CRORES WORLDWIDE. I AM ADDING A RELIABLE SOURCE FOR THE BOX OFFICE, BUT IDIOTS MAKE THIS 91 CRORE BOX OFFICE CLAIM, AND REVERT MY EDIT.
DO NOT REVERT, OR ELSE I WILL REPORT YOU.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.196.236.31 (talk) 04:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIL CHAHTA HAI WAS FLOP 

message: * Screen, interviews --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Base language

message: Hi User:Rspeer - you removed some seemingly unconnected info; I've added it back again and given the context. Please let me know if you don't agree. AvB ÷ talk 13:42, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. So much misleading or wrong in the article that there really wasn't anything worth saving. Per WP:BOLD, I redirected to Proto-language (historical linguistics) --Miskwito 20:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Europid

message: I cancelled a fault. "Europid" and "Europoid" are used by amateur anthropologists, too, but also in the correct sense of the word comprising the about 12 Europid races ( or subraces in the English nomenclature).E.g. the exclusion  of the Turanid race and the Aethiopid race does not mean that the term is not applied appropriately as it e.g. reflects scientific debate about the doubtful Negrid character of e.g. the Pharaohs or the doubtful Mongolid character of the Huns and Mongolians. Check the about 300 google matches for English pages for "Europid".That the some statements about the Europids are unscientific does not mean that the application of the term itself is unscientific. (Anonymous post by User:80.138.156.57)
:An improved article would distinguish between the scientific usage of this term, if there is one, and the more casual usage. It would then contrast conclusions based on the scientific usage with conclusions based on the informal usage, employing quotations. --Wetman 01:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The words are exact synonyms. The term "Europid" is used in continental Europe and the term "Caucasian" is used in the English-speaking world.MoritzB 16:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current stub is crap. Freedman didn't coin the term.MoritzB 18:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Europid - Caucasian
Talk:Kendall College of Art and Design

message: OK, I give up: Why was this article tagged for clean-up?  Granted, it's no featured-article candidate, but... what's wrong with it? Tverbeek 13:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?
Talk:Ármin Vámbéry

message: * Vámbéry's own national identity was obviously Hungarian not Jewish as with the case of most Jewish people in Hungary in the 19th century. 
::What makes it 'obvious'? Is it what Herzl said "[He] doesn't know whether he is more Turk than Englishman"? No mention of being Hungarian.
::Or is it that "he was a secret agent of Turkey and of England"?
::Perhaps that Herzl chose a credible, trusted JEWISH man to work with?
::" obviously Hungarian as with the case of most Jewish people in Hungary in the 19th century" quotation needed to such a claim - apart from the obvious propaganda. "Rakosi" Roth and the Jewish government of Hungary come to mind. And Tiszaeszlar.  
:: For the last 1,300 or so years the Jewish diaspora proved how adamant and resolute they are to preserve their identity and culture - despite the continuous persecution. And now they are accused that they gave it all up to become Hungarians. What is so special about Hungarians that they would readily and voluntarily abandon their identity and culture? They might even be offended by that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity, names

message: The "BALKANS" sign in the map is actually around 2000 km more to the east. The sign must be between Budapest and Istanbul.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.70.67.54 (talk) 14:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is incorrect. 

message: Removed an entire paragraph which made several unreferenced strong accusations about intrigue by Vambery. The writing was 10 years + old, all by one numbered editor, who made no other contributions—someone who very likely had a strong POV concerning Vambery. Good riddance. (Obviously the citations no longer apply) Tapered (talk) 03:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excised paragraph 

message: I only upraise the aforesaid by dint of clocking an book hight:
Dervish of Windsor Castle: 
The Life of Arminius Vambery
Alder, L. & Dalby, R. 1979 2A00:23C7:9C97:5D01:D1BB:C42E:43ED:9BBC (talk) 21:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why nowt byword anent Armin Vambery and his links to Windsor Castle!!?
Talk:Design of experiments

message: It's an experiment and maybe one of the first recorded ones... see Daniel 1:12 DennisDaniels (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: that is WP:OR; you need a good source discussing it that way, to even start a discussion. Jytdog (talk) 00:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pertinent? bible reference: test your servants for ten days Daniel 1:12 

message: Would the correct citation for the sentence "Some important contributors to the field of experimental designs are ... " be to a highly cited paper of each person's work or to a paper discussing their contributions? --- Jadeizaguirre (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct citation for "Some important contributors to the field of experimental designs are " 

message: This section refers to Factorial experiments so it should link there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial_experiment 2603:6011:2D00:4100:98F6:9046:D675:A25E (talk) 03:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multifactorial experiments should link to the info like the other sections. 

message: The problem with DoE is that the majority doesn't know what it is even about. It's one of the most important tools in science and engineering but has near to zero engagement because experts usually overcomplicate concepts that are in their core easy. Just because they can, or because they are bad teachers, or because they want to sound smart. Very frequently.
Take the German article as an example https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistische_Versuchsplanung.
They show a very intuitive plot (it would be even better to put an example next to "Factor 1", "Factor 2", etc.). Explain why DoE needs to be done, explain the concept of design space. Explain the concept of levels and factors and name a brief example without going into detail.
Getting sick of counterintuitive literature in the STEM field. Why overcomplicate things? 2A02:8071:888:90A0:598B:7FBC:D12A:7D2F (talk) 14:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please: improve the introduction
Talk:DCT

message: ----
Google search counts:
* "Discrete cosine transform" (250,000)
* "Dreams Come True"  band (458,000)
* "Distal Convoluted Tubule" (42,900)
* "Digital Component Technology" (186)
* "Digital Carrier Trunk" (74)
* "Digital Carrier Time" (36)
--Tokek 14:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cathaoirleach

message: I've commented out the horrible anglo-centric "pronuciations".  If we can't have the IPA version, it is better to have nothing. --Red King 14:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case could someone get hold of the IPA?  It is not very convenient to have to consult the article history and load an old version of the article from 2005 in order to find out how the words are pronounced.  Or very roughly how (is the horrible approximation really worse than not knowing anything at all?  If you couldn't find the IPA transcription, would you advise someone who wasn't familiar with Sinn Fein that you couldn't give them any guidance at all as to pronounciation, and risk them saying "sin" as the first syllable, or someone who didn't know the name of the Irish parliament, would you want them saying "dale"?). ~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.13.232 (talk) 10:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Opel Commodore

message: The commodore A GS and GS/E were also build as a 2-door saloon car. With this type of body, Steinmetz participated to lots of car races with lots of succes
* Yes, you are right, so I corrected the article.84.140.27.204 18:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "It was sold in the UK under the name Vauxhall Viceroy, which was a larger and more luxurious version of the Carlton."
Didn't the Viceroy use a Carlton bodyshell therefore it would be exactly the same size as the Carlton?
The Commodore C/Viceroy combined the basic Rekord/Carlton bodyshell with the somewhat longer front clip of the Senator to make room for the longer inline sixes used in the Commo. Length is 4620 vs 4723 mm.
--328cia (talk) 21:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COMMODORE C 

message: There seems to be conflcting information about the Vauxhall Viceroy, both the Commodore C and Senator A pages say it was based on them? Supertone (talk) 23:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears to have been fixed.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viceroy
Talk:MOLAP

message: ROLAP vs. MOLAP is a complicated discussion. Please do not add opinions to this article -- please respect the Neutral Point of View.
This discussion is even more complicated by the fact that there are many ROLAP and MOLAP products, and they are all different. Therefore limitations of some particular ROLAP or MOLAP tool should not be generalized to the whole subject area. Please only state the facts and omit speculations and opinions.
I'll add this remark: this statement "MOLAP differs significantly in that (in some software) it requires the pre-computation and storage of information in the cube — the operation known as processing." is not useful as a definition since (by its own admission) it doesn't cover all MOLAP tools. 
The real difference between MOLAP and ROLAP is that ROLAP doesn't store its own data. ROLAP systems define a model and pull the data from a relational source on the fly. MOLAP stores base data. SOME MOLAP systems also precalculate some aggregate data, but some (most of the ones listed in the article in fact) do not.
As a reference, see the Wikipedia article on MSTR -- ROLAP is a "relational database access system using semantically dynamic objects" according to a lawsuit between BOBJ and MSTR.
Of course the boundaries are fading, especially if ROLAP systems like MicroStrategy  are marketing their caches as MOLAP cubes. It's not an unreasonable claim by MSTR, but it makes defining things a lot harder ;-)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.44.17 (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROLAP vs. MOLAP 

message: This article could have more information about what a multi-dimensional database and cubes are.
There is some very simple, well explained, content in the Oracle RPAS user guide"Retail Predictive Analysis Server User Guide", December 2012, Oracle© Corporation.. It would be nice to include some of this type of information here for non-technical people to understand. MaryEFreeman (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview 

message: *Merge discussion is at Talk:ROLAP#Merge discussion. -DePiep (talk) 12:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Jimmy Delaney

message: Delaney was transferred from Sunderland in 1946:
Camillustalk 14:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Marcellus

message: This page is way to listy. schyler 15:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mado Robin

message: Someone had redirected the Mado (fish) talk page to here. I will removed the biology related wiki infobox. --chemica 14:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mado (fish) Talk page error 

message: "Her colleagues and relatives remember her as the sweetest and least diva-behaved of women".
Is this over-the-top? Orbicle 15:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm not sure I understood correctly but if I am then the sentence "she hit D4 above high-C in live performance in Vichy" should be changed perhaps to "she hit D4  AN OCTAVE above high-C in live performance in Vichy", doesn't it? AdamChapman (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction?

message: The statement "she hit D4 above high-C in live performance in Vichy" should say D7.  D4 is a whole step above middle C.
Here is a chart that labels the notes and gives their frequencies.  http://www.vibrationdata.com/piano.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie0479 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd think more likely four octaves and change above high C, or six octaves + above middle C, or a frequency about 8 times higher than what is given here, somewhere in the 18,800 hertz range.  Anybody can get to 2,350 Hz.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 18:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  D7