lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of numbered roads in Essex County

message: There is now  that can be used in this article. It was designed for lists like this one. Imzadi1979 (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxen 
Talk:List of numbered roads in Halton Region

message: So this article doesn't list any sources (is that even allowed anymore?), the only reference it gives is to a PDF of a map put out by Halton Region.  ...A map which disagrees in at least 4 places with the information provided on the page.  It says the southern terminus for Brant Street, Guelph Line, Appleby Line, and Burloak Drive as the QEW interchange, however the map shows those southern terminuses to be at Fairview for the first three and Harvester for the last, all of which are farther south than the QEW interchange.  I only know those because I know the map for Burlington, but if they are incorrect, I would think it highly probably that there are potentially many other errors. --Jermdeeks (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is This Correct?
Talk:EMD 567

message: There is a great EMD 567 article by noted EMD Historian Preston Cook titled "The EMD 567 Engine in the 21st Century"  at the  Railway Preservation News Website at http://www.rypn.org/ Look in the Archives section for the article. --SSW9389 (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled

message: In the table - should it read "567 with 645 power assemblies" ? Sf5xeplus (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is correct as is, a 645 "E" block with 567 power assemblies. With 645 power assemblies, it would be a 645. WuhWuzDat 18:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry - I get it now - I'm not very clued up on which bits are which in combustion engines.Sf5xeplus (talk) 20:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Someone might want to check the HP figure for the 16V version Victorian Railways X class (diesel) quotes 1840HP not 2000 ? Sf5xeplus (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 567E

message: Notes changed to small letters, move one, add one. Versions main ref NOT CORRECT. Models table played with, 2 "none built" deleted.Sammy D III (talk) 00:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  23 July 2013 

message: Please read the fourth and fifth sentence of Two-stroke diesel engine. There is more information at:Naturally aspirated, Forced induction, Roots-type supercharger, Turbocharger, and HowStuffWorks Sammy D III (talk) 04:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roots supercharger and turbocharger are both forced induction
Talk:List of numbered roads in the United Counties of Prescott and Russell

message: I'm having trouble finding it again, but within the Counties exist two roads (that I've seen on a map, anyway) that are just called "Route 500" and "Route 600". They don't seem to be county roads, and I'm not sure where within Prescott and Russell they are? Just curious the jurisdiction. Anybody live out there or elsewhere in ON and can explain? YellowAries2010 (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Routes" on the hundreds
Talk:Henryk Jordan Park, Kraków

message: "took off like wildfire"??? Changed to less dramatic language. Jimjamjak 11:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a lovely start at an article, but I wonder if it would be possible to include a little more information on how the park developed after the war up to the present. I'm particularly interested in whether it still provides meals and showers, and whether the maze is still there. 
Also, while the panarama at the bottom is a nice idea and pretty dramatic, it seems to be at an odd angle and cuts off the ground; when I first saw it, I thought only the top half was loading. Would it be possible to make another similar panarama, or other decent picture, which had greater vertical scope or at least included the ground at the bottom? The current picture is hard to interpret (for me anyway) without the ground showing at the bottom.
But otherwise, a very interesting article. I'd never heard of this before. Skittle 12:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree heavily on the panorama thing. It is a shame that, for the left two-thirds, the ground cannot be seen. Perhaps we can ask User:Prbr to take another one, and hope s/he understands English? --Dreaded Walrus  t c 13:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lovely article 
Talk:Sandwich Parkway

message: The road identified as Sandwich Parkway in the article is officially named Ojibway Parkway. There is no Sandwich Parkway within the City of Windsor. I should know since I work for the City of Windsor. A quick look at our EIS system which shows, among other things, roads and properties, reveals that the road is indeed named Ojibway Parkway between Sandwich Street and EC Row Expressway and that several properties have an Ojibway Parkway address.
Parts of this article should be incorporated into the Ojibway Parkway article and this entry should be deleted.
Mousky67 20:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article is incorrect and false
Talk:Inductive logic programming

message: The reference to ILP being first introduced in Stephen Muggleton paper was added by user User:Smuggleton, which I assume is the same Stephen Muggleton. Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines suggest a person shouldn't mention themselves in this way. I don't doubt the truth of the statement, but there's no specific citation (the book referenced does cite the 1991 aricle, and mentions Muggleton's contribution, but does not explicitly say that's the first use of the term). The sentence should probably be removed as a result. (Oh, forgot signature: ) -Agyle 09:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible conflict of interest 

message: Direct hyperlinks to conference proceedings and papers would be most useful! sydhart (talk) 09:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: If ILP is a general technique, and also the name of a conference about that technique,
it seems like they should have separate pages.  After all, the object oriented programming
page does not have the list of OOPSLA locations listed. 128.193.39.36 (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conference and Technique 

message: I moved the Example section on computing rlgg's to the Golem (ILP) article, where I think it makes most sense as long as their is no dedicated article on lgg's and related topics. Felix QW (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example section
Talk:MacNab Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:John Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Hess Village

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Wellington Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Locke Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I suggest adding the new Locke Street website to the links: www.lockestreetshops.com. It is a site being made to cover ALL of Locke Street, not just certain sections/businesses run by different associations. They also keep the public up to date on current news and events on the street through their main page as well as Facebook and Twitter feeds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.165.94 (talk) 04:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New website link to add!
Talk:Ferguson Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Wentworth Street

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: See WP:ONRD/STDS for the headers used in articles. Most of the current headers belong under a Route description. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 21:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sectin headers
Talk:Sherman Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Upper Sherman on the mountain, not mentioned. Doesn't directly connect, but is in a straightline with Sherman. (if the road were extended up the mountain, they would connect)
Sherman Cut on mountain connects Upper Sherman to Sherman Access.
Sherman Avenue in lower Hamilton doesn't appear to connect to Sherman Access, which goes sort of diagnonally down the mountain.
Feldercarb (talk) 22:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems?
Talk:Gage Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Ottawa Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Barton Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Wilson Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Wilson street ancaster was made in 1907  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.17.48 (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  when it was made
Talk:Jackson Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Hunter Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Augusta Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Charlton Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:York Boulevard

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Fennell Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Rymal Road (Hamilton, Ontario)

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhl4hamilton (talk • contribs) 05:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I used to have a map (from the 50's or before) that showed a village named Rymal. It was located, I think, at the corner of Rymal Road and Upper Gage. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village of Rymal
Talk:Grandidier's mongoose

message: Is this the right critter? --Wetman 09:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's a Banded Mongoose. • Rabo³ • 06:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Is it correct to write "giant-striped mongoose," i.e. mongoose with giant stripes, or is this properly a "giant striped mongoose," i.e. a mongoose that is large and striped? —Monado (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenated name? 

message: The file for the image accompanying this article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mungo1.jpg, gives an entirely different species name, Narrow-striped Mongoose (Mungotictis decemlineata). The critter in the film clip, copyright BBC , has broader stripes, which might be a species or an individual difference. —Monado (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image?
Talk:Don Mills Road

message: The problem with the citations on this article aren't any particularly controversial statements requiring verification with Template:fact.  It's that there are too few references in general.  I added some where I could (before that there were no references!), but I think it's clear that the article needs to cite more sources.  I'd like to re-tag with Template:Refimprove, but I'll admit to not being 100% on WP guidelines for roads. - Intractable (talk) 22:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tagging is ugly. I'd rather you just add a  tag wherever you think there should be a citation. --Pwnage8 (talk) 01:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Except for the news stories, I suppose there's nothing particularly contentious.  My preference is for articles to be heavily sourced, but maybe that's hard to do in the context of a road.  I've sourced or requested sources for things that feel like they need support, so I'm ok with leaving it without the tag.  Cheers. -- Intractable (talk) 02:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:York Mills Road

message: The article states that York Mills was the 10th concession road.  Isn't it just the sixth (1 Queen, 2 Bloor, 3 St. Clair, 4 Eglinton, 5 Lawrence, 6 Wilson/York Mills), or am I not understanding how this works? WillNL (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably wrong. I've read in places that either Eglinton or Queens Street is the base line. In either case, the roads in Markham make zero sense. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 10th concession?
Talk:Markham Road

message: I have re-written the article and have added a history section and references. More needs to be added to the history section, but I'm too bushed right now to continue. Sources to be added include Statues of Canada on The Scarborough and Markham Plank-road Company and Scarborough Community Names from the Scarborough Historical Society, which has a few details about early communities on the route and their development vis-à-vis the road.--papageno (talk) 08:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll merge it into Ontario Highway 48, since Markham Road and it are basically the same. No need for two articles on one road. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 13:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think that makes sense. I presume you wish to merge the York Regional Road 68 article into the Ontario Highway 48 article as well? Might I suggest we place the  template on both this article and at the York Regional Road 68 article, instead of the  template on this page, as well as the  template at the destination Ontario Highway 48 article? This is what is being proposed, and following the merger steps (see Help:Merging; apologies if this is old hat to you, as I suspect it may be) gives a better indication of what has happened to the source article.--papageno (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true, and yes that is my intention. I haven't done much in the way of merging, and my experience has always been with Ontario roads to just be bold; nobody else has maintained them, so I'm stepping up and bringing the mop through. I'll add the templates and remove the prod. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 19:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote article and added history section and references; more work needed
Talk:Keele Street

message: While Keele is the "third road west of Yonge" it was called the "Fourth Concession Road" as it "fronts" the fourth concession.
Take a look at google maps near King Road and Keele.
* https://www.google.ca/maps/place/King+City,+ON/@43.9284872,-79.5651294,13.5z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x882ad7c53ed84c81:0xdcd247af87aef252!8m2!3d43.9287125!4d-79.5282242?hl=en
* Bathhurst = "Second Concession Road"
* Dufferin="Third"
* Keele="Fourth"
* Jane="Fifth"
* Weston="Sixth"
* the next road is the "Seventh Concession Road"
Feldercarb (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Concession Is It
Talk:Lake Shore Boulevard

message: Discussion at Talk:List of roads in Toronto, Ontario Eco84 | Talk 00:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: Referring to the Etobicoke section.Transportfan70 (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the designation from 'Road' to 'Boulevard' take place?
Talk:Islington-City Centre West

message: Six points isn't the "central point" of the grid. It is a unique junction formed by the diagonal Dundas crossing Bloor and Kipling.Feldercarb (talk) 00:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Humewood–Cedarvale

message: I think of "Humewood" and "Cedarvale" as two separate neighbourhoods and that this article should be split into two separate ones.  Indeed, a lot of this article seems to be devoted to discussing the differences between Humewood and Cedarvale and it would read better if it were two articles.
It has been a long time since I have lived in Toronto, but I assume that people would agree that these are distinct neighbourhoods.
I am unsure technically what the best way to split an article is.  I was planning on renaming this article to "Cedarvale", removing the stuff about "Humewood", and putting that into a new article.  Is there a better way to do this? Nicksh 19:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are similarities between the neighbourhoods.  For example, both Humewood and Cedarvale have similar demographics, such as having large Jewish and Filipino populations, and mainly upper class neighbourhoods.  Additionally, the City of Toronto recognizes Humewood and Cedarvale as one neighbourhood rather than two, according to the source. Johnny Au 20:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't know Cedarvale as there are no Filipinos in Cedarvale. You think they can afford a house for 2 million dollars? 76.65.21.144 (talk) 21:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Split this article?
Talk:Oakwood Village

message: The photo on this page is not of Oakwood-Vaughan.  This is clear due to the bus in the photo having a destination sign of "512 Keele", showing that this photo is of St. Clair Ave. W. 99.233.72.134 (talk) 03:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: I believe that the Festivals section needs some cleaning up.  By the way, Facebook links are not a reliable source per WP:SELFPUBLISH.  Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Festivals
Talk:Eastern Avenue (Toronto)

message: Discussion at Talk:List of roads in Toronto, Ontario Eco84 | Talk 00:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: Despite this bus not stopping on Eastern, I feel it's worth mentioning as it does run almost the entire length of the street, and certainly accounts for a large part of the bus travel along this road. - SimonP (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as the Don Valley Parkway makes no mention of the bus route that travels most of its length, this road shouldn't mention the bus that travels on it. Buses travel convoluted routes, and many stop or pass by roads; they aren't noteworthy. There is an article dedicated to this information; List of bus routes in Toronto. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The principal of detail proportional to length applies to the DVP and this page. We can have more detail on pages like this. Though, mentioning the number of GO buses that use the DVP would be perfectly appropriate for that article, in my mind at least. - SimonP (talk) 18:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If we had articles on each GO bus route, I'd agree. Mentioning that GO buses travel along the DVP is good. If someone decides "I want to take that GO bus along the DVP", then they can look at the source for that piece of information: The Go schedule. The number of the GO bus isn't important to the subject of the Don Valley Parkway though. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 19:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 143 Express bus
Template talk:National symbols of Poland

message: :I like it. Don't forget to add it here.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you improve on the look of this navbox somehow? There's a lot of empty space between the lines, and the word wrap makes it even worse. I changed the haunting peach color of the background. Is Kotwica a national symbol of Poland, or am I missing something? --Poeticbent talk 22:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted to have the background color similar to the shade of red in the national colors, but perhaps your suggestion is better. I don't know if you can help the interlines as long as we use :Template:Navbox. I'm not particularly keen on keeping the Kotwica here, but it is included in :Category:National symbols of Poland. — Kpalion(talk) 09:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked the white-red variant better :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  13:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

text: That's beacause the actual crimson red from our flag is too dark and the black and blue letters would be almoste invisible. — Kpalion(talk) 16:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a new suggestion directly on your navbox design. Please, take a look. Is that what you meant? --Poeticbent talk 17:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it looks pretty good. — Kpalion(talk) 18:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Looks good, and we should certainly translate those missing articles.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I see your point, Poeticbent. I will make the choice while moving it to the Template namespace. Thanks for you imput. — Kpalion(talk) 08:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: OK, I went ahead and moved it. Now everyone's invited to work on the red links. — Kpalion(talk) 19:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See discussion here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 00:02, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion about what to include