lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Polytechnic University of Milan

message: I suggest to change the title of this article to "Politecnico di Milano". It is an explicit policy of the Politecnico that the name of the institution be always written in Italian. See for example their web pages in English: http://www.polimi.it/en/university/. Academics working at the Politecnico are required to sign their papers with their affiliations written as "Politecnico di Milano". It is also more consistent with the rest of the article, where it is always called "the Politecnico". Gmrozz (talk) 07:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: this issue has been discussed before, see for example the requested move in a previous thread. I personally opposed the rename to the current english translation, but apparently the consensus is that this is the most common and recognizable name for english speakers, and this is a more important parameter than the official policy of the Politecnico per WP:TITLE. (P.s. I moved your section at the end of the page as it is common practice to have recent discussions at the bottom) --Ita140188 (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

text: There seems to have been very little support in the earlier discussion, for moving to the English name. I support a rename. (Disclosure: I recently did some teaching at the university). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

text: I agree that "Politecnico" is part of a proper name and, as such, ought not be translated.- phi (talk) 16:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politecnico di Milano (not Polytechnic University of Milan)
Talk:Joseph Arch

message: Lack of a "criticism" section.
The article, like Wikipedia articles generally, simply assumes that unionisation will improve the wages and conditions of workers. A total failure to include the alternative point of view (of economics - of W.H. Hutt and so many other economists) that wages and conditions of work are determined by supply-and-demand and that that efforts to improve them by "collective bargaining" will lead to higher unemployment.2A02:C7D:B5B8:DA00:C82E:881E:47A5:4FB5 (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Joseph Arch's place of birth needs disambiguating, as there are at least two Barfords in England. I could guess that it was the Norfolk one, on the basis of his later life. But this would be a guess, so I am leaving the link pointing to the dab page. -- Chris j wood 09:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to disambiguate place of birth 

message: The former article read more like an account of agricultural unionisation, rather than of the man who contributed to it. It also lacked sufficient references and was somewhat incoherent because of the piecemeal way in which information was added. The new additions and restyling seek to remedy these shortcomings without, I hope, treading on too many toes. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The man, not the movement 

message: I would have thought that historically he was more important as a trade union leader than as an MP so I have changed this to "trade unionist and politician". So far as I can see there has been no discussion of this before.Spinney Hill (talk) 08:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted, . Since the start of the article, the lead described him only as a politician  although, in the earlier versions, it was mostly his TU activity that was described. Sweetpool50 (talk) 10:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Talk:McNemar's test

message: I don't think the given table fit the McNemar's test.
The test should be used in case of frequency counts on a dichotomic scale, with two measures on the same units (so the observations are dependents): in the article it's stated: dichotomic trait with matched pairs of subjects (that is the same).  But matched pairs stands for tho measures on the same subjects: so the sex on somebody cannot fix (unless we want to know how many subjects change sex after having flown!).
The mis-understanding rely on the fact that in the article we talk about contingency table.  The McNemar's test is not for 2x2 contingency table (with indipendent observations!) whereas it should be applied the Fisher's exact test or Chi squared test. 
See the table in the italian wiki.
--Francesco R. 09:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I've not edited statistics articles widely yet so I'm hesitant to make the edit but I don't think having software specific code is really appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Should it be removed? —mako๛ 17:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Wikipedia is not a manual. This kind of content should go to Wikibooks. Calimo (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAS Output 

message: I added this in "Related tests" section but I think it needs more checking and cleaning of the citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Talgalili (talk • contribs) 12:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   Liddell's exact test

message: The definition is not stated correctly or clearly.  "The null hypothesis of marginal homogeneity states that the two marginal probabilities for each outcome are the same, i.e. pa + pb = pa + pc and pc + pd = pb + pd."  a, b, c, and d are counts, not outcomes, so there is no such thing as pa, etc.  This should simply read "a+b = a+c and c+d = b+d."  Furthermore, the phrase "the two marginal probabilities for each outcome are the same" is unclear, as it does not refer to any column or row of probabilities on the margins of the table.  It means the count of Test 2 negative outcomes is equal to count of Test 1 negative outcomes, and the count of Test 2 positive outcomes equals the count of Test 1 positive outcomes.  These are not marginal probabilities; "outcome positive/negative" is not a variable in this data, so there is no one variable being isolated from the rest of the table. Philgoetz (talk) 21:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: The formula for `exact-P-value` yields a probability greater than 1 for b = c. For example, with b = c = 2, we get summands 0.375 (i=2), 0.25 (i=3) and 0.0625 (i=4), totalling 0.6875, and times 2 this is 1.375. The implementation https://github.com/jowagner/mtb-tri-training/blob/master/scripts/mcnemar-exact-test.py fixes this by adding only half of the summand for i = n/2. The problem would go away if the formula was restricted to b > c. Jojo (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  P-value greater than 1
Talk:Hengiform monument

message: The reference to a henge at Barford needs disambiguating, as there are several Barfords in England. However the original author(s) have provided no references on this page which would enable this to be easily done, so I'm leaving the reference pointing to the dab page. -- Chris j wood 09:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to disambiguate reference to Barford
Talk:Benjamin Cohen

message: I can barely keep up with all of the comments on this page.  Please sign your entries with ~~~~. KC9CQJ 16:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PLEASE SIGN YOUR ENTRIES

message: The wikipedia community voted to keep the article. The disambiguation is a completely different issue, and despite any one person's view of who is "obscure" the point here is clarity for users of the wikipedia project - not the personal profile of one individual's entry. Many people have no interest in UK TV journalists but much interest in a former Princeton professors views on the internation monetary system and global finance. If a subject is notable for inclusion and there can be confusion for wikipedia users disambiguation rules apply. See WP:D JudyRobinson 10:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: - In process following third and fourth opinions. JudyRobinson 20:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also came from the third opinion page; and I agree with Amatulic; this should be a disambiguation page. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 19:52, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation dispute

message: I came here from a plea posted on Wikipedia:Third opinion. Addressing some comments above:
* The Wikipedia community never "voted to keep the page as is." They voted to allow the page to remain on Wikipedia rather than deleting it. Pages on Wikipedia are never static, so keeping it "as is" is meaningless.
* The proper way to organize biography articles with the same name is to use a disambiguation page. It is also proper to reference that disambiguation page at the beginning of each article that the disambig page points to. It is not correct to use one article as a disambiguation resource for another. This violates WP:NPOV by implying that Wikipedia places greater importance on one biography over another.
* My recommendation is to move this article to "Benjamin Cohen (journalist)" and convert this Benjamin Cohen article into a redirect page, redirecting "Benjamin Cohen" to Benjamin Cohen (disambiguation) -Amatulic 19:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: - In process following third and fourth opinions. JudyRobinson 20:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also came from the third opinion page; and I agree with Amatulic; this should be a disambiguation page. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 19:52, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion

message: There is also a Benjamin Cohen (disambiguation) page. Is there someone out there who is handier at redirection and who can easily combine one with the other and then redirect to the combined page? Butwhatdoiknow 02:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguate the disambiguation?
Talk:Erik Morales

message: The writer seems to have gotton the Jesus Chavez & Carlos Hernandez fights mixed up.
Chavez is the one who was dropped twice & injured his hand, only throwing left hands down the stretch
Also, Saying that Morales "has never been punched to the canvas" is misleading. Morales has been down. He was called for a knockdown during the 12th round of the classic first bout with Barrera. 
Althought most feel it was an incorrect decision by the referee & not a legitimate knock down. 
Technically, he has been punched to the canvas.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatpom (talk • contribs) 03:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: kudos to the author of the chronology section.  i'm a boxing fan but i don't have the time to compile such information.  i would appreciate such a chronology on every fighter's entry.  Streamless 15:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology Section 

message: Yeah, the super feather and light weight divisions are the same, the are not separate, it should either be one or the other, or a slash or something.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.228.60 (talk) 02:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Featherweight and Junior Lightweight 

message: Wow, I just browsed the article and the style of writting is terrible, the POV issues in it are ridiculous, instances like: Morales defeated his hated rival Marco Antonio Barrera, Morales dominated the fight against Jesús Chávez in 2004 and Morales wins the WBC Super Featherweight Title after humiliating Jesús Chávez in their bout in 2004 and section titles like: Unexpected loss to Raheem and Shocked by Pacquiao are just unacceptable specially in an article about someone often regarded as a legend. -- Caribbean~H.Q. 04:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strong POV and POV tag

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. As argued, there seems to be a wide use of the non-accented version, including the subject's own social accounts. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 10:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 October 2022
Talk:Medway Valley

message: " ... from Tonbridge to Rochester, Kent"! What on earth does that mean? This article is based entirely on the fact that the Medway Valley Countryside Partnership is looking after the interests of part of the River Medway. Why it should need a separate article from River Medway is a puzzle ... no wonder Wikipedia has so many articles!!!! Peter Shearan 09:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Merge.It has out lived its use. I have an opposite problem- there is a demand for a Medway Valley Walk- a footpath that follows exactly the path of the River Medway- needed  because all footpaths have an article- but just repetitious!  ClemRutter (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Someone has to be brave and do the merge! ++ MortimerCat (talk) 20:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a separate article?
Talk:Keeper of the Seven Keys: Part I

message: I've added the bonus tracks on the expanded edition of this album. If anyone feels it should be moved to the track list, then go ahead and move it. Also, could anyone get more information about the expanded edition such as the composers and any other information that could be useful?
--Bahamut 10:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded Edition 

message: Okay, I have a real weird version of this album. I noticed that track 6 on the album wasn't in fact that Future World and that there was in deed an extra song with a different guy singing. After Getting the Helloween Ep + Walls of Jericho I've confirmed that this is the track Judas, that was featured as a bonus-track at the end of that compilation.
Now why is Judas on this album to begin with and why it's right smack in the middle of the album (with no confirmation that the song would even be on the album on the CD-case or booklet), I haven't a clue? I bought it from a legitamite establishment so I do not question its origins, I just wish to know if this was an error in some versions of the CD re-release or what exactly is this? -TheHande 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird-@$$ version. 

message: Have someone of authors of the article listened to the album if they had have, the would have realized, that the album is NOT Power Metal, but more mixture of Heavy and Speed Metal. Prandr —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.142.131.179 (talk) 13:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have somebody listened to  it? 
Talk:Célestine Galli-Marié

message: Célestine Marié is the name used in the New Grove
(re unsigned/dated comment above)
In fact Galli-Marié is the name used in the 1997 New Grove Opera (ie under G) - not Célestine Marié; Galli-Marié was her stage name and the one to which she always referred. Does the page title need to be changed?  Cg2p0B0u8m (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct. The 1992 Grove gives Galli-Marié. I think it should be moved. --Kleinzach 22:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to move it, but couldn't. We'll need an admin to fix it. --Kleinzach 08:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Thank you for following up this. Just for information the edition of Grove I use is a 1998 paperback of the 1997 edition.
Cg2p0B0u8m (talk) 23:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I deleted this sentence.  Carmen is often enough sung by sopranos.  Kostaki mou (talk) 03:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A major exception to this is the title role of ''[[Carmen]]''.

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Atelier Nadar - Galli-Marié in Bizet's Carmen.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 2, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-06-02. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Atelier Nadar - Galli-Marié in Bizet's Carmen.jpg scheduled for POTD 

message: In this caption, "Galli-Marié premiered the rôle [sic] of Mignon in 1866." I used the same spelling in the article on Les Troyens and it was reverted by a gang of Philistines. I hope they are enjoying their comic books! Autodidact1 (talk) 04:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bravo!
Talk:Sony Ericsson Z800i

message: i m business man an international type i buy in large contities but for now i will like to buy in samle thank raymond. Egomondgold 10:13, 9 December 2005 Egomondgold (UCT)
:Thank you for that Egomondgold ^ ^ JayKeaton 08:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The article said "Memory Stick Pro Duo card (up to 2 MiB)". I doubt that there even are Memory Sticks that small and i presume that it was intended to say 2 GiB. However, i couldn't find any source for that, so i simply removed that part. 
213.238.233.27 20:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 MiB?
Talk:Charulata

message: "Parallel Cinema"
As of yet, there is no Wikipedia entry for 'Parallel Cinema,' and I was wondering if an Indian film aficionado or historian could contribute something on this movement.  In doing some editing on Charulata, I encountered the term (which I've run across before), and think it's relevant enough to leave in, but someone more qualified than I should also try to shed some light upon the term.
David--Davidals 12:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These sections need to be sourced. -Classicfilms 04:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources needed

message: The movie explicitly sets the date as 1879-80. The editor reads an 1879 date off the newspaper masthead, reference is made to the Afghan War (1878-80) and the contestants in the 1880 British election are identified as the Tory  "Dizzy" (ie Disraeli) and the Liberal Gladstone, who won (hence the office celebration). Whatever daily  calendar Ray purported to  use as a prop  was obviously out of synch with the director's plain intent. Seth A. Halpern (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of action 

message: P. S. May 17 also fell on a Monday in 1880, the year of the British parliamentary election referred to in the movie; thus there was no actual  conflict between Ray's intent and his  use of a prop calendar. Seth A. Halpern (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of action
Talk:Moving average (disambiguation)

message: Hmm, this seems a bit off. Why should we disambig to detailed uses without even simply saying what a simple moving average is? Any ideas on how to keep the disambig but cover what a MA is? - Taxman Talk 15:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Never tells what it is

message: As far as I am aware there is no special mathematical requirement for a moving average to be defined as averaging over previous data in a timeseries.  
A 'backwards'-evaluated moving average always induces a shift in the data.  I often prefer to to use a centred moving average, taking both 'past' and 'future' data into account, which induces no shift.  
There is also no restriction on using a moving average (however evaluated) to try to smooth any arbitrary function.  
Essentially moving averages are used for smoothing, and this is a much broader application than the article currently implies, which is too heavily 'weighted' toward stockmarket applications.  
— DIV (128.250.204.118 09:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Moving average'' article is too narrow

message: I'm pretty sure the term "Rolling average" means exactly the same thing.  I'm thinking this should go into the introduction.  --Starwed 15:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling average 

message: "An SMA can lag to an undesirable extent, and can be disproportionately influenced by old data points dropping out of the average."
The average is not influenced by data points dropping out of it, but by data points that have not yet dropped out. 
84.147.231.109 22:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influenced by
Talk:West Coast Rap-The First Dynasty

message: What are the sales figures for this album? - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 11:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

message: This is an album by a notable band, hence it passes WP:MUSIC. 
Sorted as part of the Notability Wikiproject --B. Wolterding 12:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability established
Talk:Workers Resistance

message: It looks to me that they were never a small Trotskyist political party as is claimed in the lead of the article but rather they were a group of fraudsters who pretended to be a small Trotskyist political party. Have they ever been a genuine party? Is the group of people who split with them (the Group of Proletarian Revolutionaries - Collectivists) a genuine political group?--JK the unwise 11:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: fair enough, this might become clearer if more information about the genuine activities of the group can be found.--JK the unwise 11:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the expelled people haven't rejoined Workers' Resistance. They've formed a new group - I don't know the name of it though. Homey 13:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were they a small Trotskyist political party? 

message: Is it "Workers Resistance" or "Workers' Resistance"? The article uses both. I think the apostrophe version makes more grammatical sense. --Fang Aili talk 19:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophe 

message: Group of Proletarian Revolutionaries Collectivists never was a part of WR. I begrounded GPRC independently of Vernik. But I really knew Vernik and in 1992 recommended it to Ted Grant's tendency (mea maxima culpa) . . .  In 2003 I received information about the scam and sent it to my Western left-wing friends. See more about that - http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2008-204.cfm , http://proletar.org.ua/vck/537/vladislav-bugera-ufa-moskva-rf-pismo-v-rassylku-stachkomru-31-avgusta-2003-goda . - Vladislav Bugera, a begrounder of GPRC Бугера Владислав Евгеньевич (talk) 07:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPRC