File talk:Video Standards.png

message: 1152x864 is a very common resolution for 17" screens, at the very least more common than SXGA+, WSXGA+ and the likes. --Trygvebw 13:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a variant of XGA (or XGA-2?), which I myself haven't encountered yet. It isn't listed in the article on XGA in the English Wikipedia, but for example in the German one. Christoph Päper 12:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's 1152x864? 

message: Just thinking out loud... —Nightstallion (?) 21:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beautiful enough to be a [[WP:FP]]? 

message: I thought WSXGA is 1440x900 (my laptop), not 1680x1050. --Chris 13:41, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WSXGA Res? 

message: how about adding the 3:2 aspect ratio to compare with photos and other things at that size? --128.6.176.13 20:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3:2 

message: Conspicuous by its absence are the EGA 640x350 mode and CGA 640×200 mono mode. I'd add them myself, but I'd make a complete hash of it. Plus I have no idea how best to express non 1:1 pixel size modes? --Billpg 19:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EGA and CGA-mono? 

message: Also missing from this chart is the WXGA display mode.  I realize that the denotation of 'WXGA' is kind of sloppy- there's 16:9 and 16:10, and you already have the HD 720 mode up.  However, I've been looking at many laptops with WXGA screens at 1280x800.  I, too, would ruin the pic if I tried adding it myself.
Thanks for the great reference, though!  (Full size! 0.o)
: Wikipedia's own WXGA article says "Usually WXGA is understood to refer to a 1366 x 768 resolution with an aspect ratio of 16:9".  So please add it to this awesome chart on the purple 16:9 line, maybe with an asterisk because computer and TV makers slap "WXGA" on so many resolutions. -- Skierpage 04:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The WXGA article is simply wrong; it's not "one or the other" but a case where the terms differ depending on whether you're talking from TV/Consumer-electronics-land or computers.  Going by the closest thing to a definitive standards body for displays (VESA), they use both in different contexts: http://www.vesa.org/Public/Panel%20Standards/TVpnlV1.pdf - 1366x768 for TVs / http://www.vesa.org/press/AsiaTourOct05.pdf "WXGA. (1280x768)" for computer displays. Nate (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WXGA? 

message: So how about 1440x900 (on the 16/10 line). Many 17" laptops have this resolution. It should be WXGA+ (which is in my own opinion different from WSXGA; I would write WXGA+ if I were you). Maybe adding it would be nice. :-) --Le Sage 13:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about 1440x900? 

message: What about the traditional analog NTSC American television standard?
 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.7.39.176 (talk • contribs).
: This Illustration is about digital Formats. Analog ones are not easily comparable. (Okay, displayed PAL somehow got in there.) “Digital NTSC” (4:3) is something between VGA and 720 × 540. -- Christoph Päper 12:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NTSC 

message: If someone revs this, there's a fairly common WSVGA standard (used mainly in smaller subnotebooks and ultramobile PCs) at 1024x600 - it's a non-standard aspect ration in between 16:9 and 16:10. Nate (talk) 08:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WSVGA