lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jack-Jack Attack

message: Shouldn't that 'Powers section' be deleted. I don't see its purpose. In any event it should only be explained once what Jack-Jack's are. Adso 08:30, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some purpose to having it twice.  The first is just a listed rundown within the synopsis, the second is the "Powers section" that compares his powers to that of other super heroes and characters.  If anything the write-up from the synopsis should be merged with the powers section, not delete the powers section altogether.  I'll take a crack at it. Dannybu2001 18:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers 

message: Is her shirt turning from yellow to blue really a goof?  After all she is also cleaner then before.  It could easily be assumed that once she gave up Jack-Jack to Syndrome she went home, bathed and changed her shirt before the agency got ahold of her.  Since there is a logical explanation, I would say that it isn't a goof.Headrattle 01:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts exactly. Dannybu2001 19:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

text: [originally posted by 71.105.104.238 on the article page (—tregoweth (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goof? 

message: Removed teleportation as OR. At no point is he actually shown teleporting, and given the assortment of other powers listed getting out of a crib undetected seems plausible without it. Noclevername (talk) 23:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Only what's shown.

message: for me, its always the same thing, you watch something but you dont know which music is playing ... how about adding that?
The Choral segmant is the "Dies Irae" (Day of Wrath) from Mozart's Requiem.
Here's the music in order of timeline:
"Turkish March" from Sonata K.331
Rondo from "Eine Kleine Nachtmusic" K.525
"Dies Irae" from Mozart's Requiem, K. 626  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.110.75 (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding music information? 
Talk:3rd Infantry Division (United States)

message: Original article stated that the 3rd Infantry Division served at Anzio for just under 4 months, whereas it has now been corrected to just over 4 months.  The first elements arrived at Anzio on January 22 and the breakout that the 3rd ID spearheaded occurred on May 23rd.
Also, it mentions that the breakout was Operation Diadem.  More accurately it should be stated that the breakout was Operation Buffalo, which was the code name for the attack towards Cisterna.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.254.18.190 (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on Anzio Participation:
Talk:Lake Trasimeno

message: Is "Tuscan 'Chiana' district" a typo? The only entry on Chiana is a farscape character. Balletgirl313 17:21, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
Is the correct spelling Trasimene or Trasimeno?
The correct spelling is Trasimeno. Btw 'Chiana' is not a typo.
Trasimeno is the Italian spelling.   Trasimène in the French spelling.  Trasimene is the British-English spelling.   (British-English spellings of Italian place names frequently follow French.)   
When Britain still thought of itself as an imperial power, the educational curriculum included a lot on the Roman empire, almost as though it were a precursor to The British Empire. British school children, at least in the posh schools got, a lot of classical history.   They certainly got an earful of the Ballad of Lars Porsenna of Clusium (Chiusi), an Etruscan King who had a run-in with the expanding Roman empire a couple of centuries before the Caesars killed off the republic.   In that ballad the lake is Trasimene.   However, since the British stopped learning classical history and (more recently) stopped learning any history at all, most of us have no reason to know that there ever was an 'English' word for Trasimeno!Charles01 23:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, I edited the copy, obviously badly translated from the Italian.  If anyone doesn't like how I did it, feel free to do it yourself.  Jhobson1 18:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up the copy 
Talk:Bast (biology)

message: OK, someone please try to give some logical rationale for why a substub on something not very well known gets to be listed at Bast, while a detailed article on the most commonly known use of the word is stuck at Bast (goddess). That other article should definitely be here and this thing can exist as a dicdef disambig line in italics at the top or bottom of that other article. DreamGuy 17:23, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
I'm guessing its because plant biology is more commonly described in an academic environment than Bast, who is only one deity of many, in a field of study (egyptology), which is no-where near as popular, or as useful to industry, as botany. ~~~~ 17:48, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves

message: The removal of content was  due to the fact that I was unable to find any information in regard to those particular entries into that section.  If you wish to replace them, please be so kind as to give me a link to where I can find information that will verify those entries as legitimate. --Chanting Fox 17:27, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal from bosses section 

message: There have been significant changes made overall, including total tenses update and the compression of the lengthy introduction.  Also, the plot has been added. I personally believe that tthis page is ready to be taken off the "cleanup" list.  If there is anything anyone believes should be added/deleted, please do so now. CryptoStorm 16:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Update

message: I'm going to clean this up, and add a couple sections (Gameplay and Plot). Oh yeah, adding features.  Abby724 18:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being bold. 

message: I felt the article needed more descriptions of the skills required in the game; safe cracking, plane flying, disguises etc. So I added them! This is my first ever edit, so sorry if its not up to scratch. Surlysearle 17:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Skills 

message: Some of the article doesn't sound encyclopedic, and also, Wikipedia shouldn't have original research. You know, no "judging by" sort of things. Abby724 05:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article

message: Seriously, it's written in a very awkward, run-on, almost narrative style... and it desperately needs to be cleaned up.  Someone with a lot of spare time should get to work clearing it up...  --Luigifan (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the plot? 
Talk:List of browser engines

message: Since this big is not so big, wouldn't it be a good idea to merge it with layout engine? I'm not bold enough to do it without consent. Pilaf 17:28, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: +1. They are not enough to make an article and layout engines used by some obscure browsers may remain unknown. --FedericoMP 03:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: Apparently it's a sort of mini HTML control thingy, but I don't know much about it, other than that it is it's own stand-alone layout engine. No word on standards support, CSS support, ... I don't know - I was hoping to find that out here. Shinobu 04:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: QHTM

message: BlackBerry are claiming full CSS2.1 support with their latest version: . That's probably worth adding? Robin (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: this homepage seems to be very strange for me. is there any docs what exactly is supported(or not)? I wiull add bb if i get the data... mabdul 0=* 12:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BlackBerry?
Talk:Buick Riviera

message: I incline to reject the accented European spelling of coupe as added in the last edit.  The word is never spelled or pronounced that way in the U.S., and the Riviera had no significant presence abroad.  Barring good arguments to the contrary, I'll probably revert.  RivGuySC 17:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - such spelling is out of place in a U.S. model.  --SFoskett 00:51, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
-----
ArgentLA's last revisions have done a good bit to clean up and organize the article, but I have a couple of doubts.  I don't think the '71-'76 run constitues two generations.  The only major difference that occured in '74 was the substitution of the notchback roof for the boat-tail.  And I'm not sure that the '86 should be said to share the Regal chassis.  The Regal didn't go front-drive until '88. RivGuySC 17:46, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: As the article even admits, the Riviera was only reskinned from its "boattail" 1973 look to its notchback look for 1974. That same body shell was used, with the same wheelbase, and some of the front sheetmetal. If the "seventh generation" Riviera remains such after its 1989 update (as it should), the 1974-76 model should be considered as part of the "third generation". If no one objects, I'll make the change. Rhettro76 21:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the loss of the boattail design was a HUGE change. Visually, the '73 and '74 are more different than some other vehicles' two generations. I think they should remain separate. --Sable232 00:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree that it was a notable change, and it should be noted. And maybe it's just me, but calling it a different "generation" when all of the mechanicals and many of the body panels carried over is overstating things a bit. Maybe if it was called Series II or Mark II or version II of its third generation would be more accurate. In reality, the changes from 1988 to 89 were just as extensive. Thoughts? Rhettro76 18:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third/Fourth Generation?

message: This section has some serious factual and stylistic errors.  Corporations don't "feel" anything.  GM may have identified a market for a personal luxury car in the 1950's, but it didn't feel anything.  Also in the 1950's the Ford Thunderbird was a two door, two place roadster more in the league of the Corvette of the same era.  The whole section should either be rewritten with appropriate references or scrapped as a duplication of the Wiki article on Personal Luxury Cars.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkpeninmd (talk • contribs) 22:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins of the personal luxury car
Talk:Midwest League

message: Is this an 'A' grade league? It seems to be, shouldn't this be noted in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.8.101 (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The MiLB (Minor League Baseball) plans to reduce the number of minor league affiliates from 160 to 118, the eradication of four short-season A and Advanced Rookie Leagues, and most likely, the Burlington Bees and Clinton LumberJacks. 2605:E000:100D:C571:8C36:F847:196F:592 (talk) 23:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed cut of Burlington and Clinton by MiLB
Talk:Jesse Helms

message: This talk page includes 10-year old discussions. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone fix the archiving? 

message: One of the notable aspects of Jesse Helms is his incendiary rhetoric and actions on matters related to race. Yet, the lead makes no mention of the fact that the man was a race-baiter and, in the eyes of many, a racist. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lead notes at several points his opposition to civil rights legislation....but I take it you want something beyond that. I'd make a concrete proposal (i.e. proposed direct quote) and we'll go from there.Rja13ww33 (talk) 00:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you continue scrubbing the lead. Sources and discussion later in the article clearly show Helms was regarded by his peers as a staunch racist. I am undoing your scrubbing attempt. 2600:1702:5345:2010:75C0:9C71:334:E82B (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Read . Just flat out calling someone a racist is a issue with MOS. (Ergo your edit will be reverted.) We can certainly note his racially charged rhetoric....but how you do it is inappropriate. Rja13ww33 (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead fails to summarize his views on race
Talk:Revolution OS

message: Is it legal to link the movie itself?  Is the movie itself freely distributable?
* But is the dvd a liveboot distribution which can play itself?  (a recursive dvd!) -- Sy / (talk)
:No, the author of the film asked not to distribute copies of it. --Anthony Ivanoff 28 June 2005 03:56 (UTC)
::It doesn't matter if we have a link to the movie, as long as the movie is not on Wikipedia... if for some reasons there is a copyright infringement on the movie, then it will be taken off that site and nothing will happen to us. Cbrown1023 17:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Copyrights says "However, if you know that an external Web site is carrying a work in violation of the creator's copyright, do not link to that copy of the work. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States". Removing. 79.74.255.75 12:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Video

message: i think it's a shame that a movie about free software is itself copyrighted even after 4 years!!
is the interviews freely avaliable?
:Free software is also copyrighted, which is vital to its success. Superm401 - Talk 06:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not open or "Free" content either. Which is rather obviously the original poster's point if you care to be a little less pedantic. —Pengo  talk · contribs 07:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  a shame 

message: The main red links at this point are links to various film festivals.  Many of these festivals are red-linked from elsewhere too (e.g., Film festivals in North and Central America).  It seems to mainly represent a lack of coverage on Wikipedia's part of various (smaller) film festivals.  I don't think any of these red links need to be removed from this article, and therefore propose removing the "redlinks" tag.  --Erik Demaine 20:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: redlinks tag? —Pengo 23:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. done. ❝Sverdrup❞ 11:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. That redlinks tag —Pengo 00:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links
Talk:Print

message: This page used to redirect to printing so I've changed it to so it's a disambig page. Celestianpower 18:35, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is not mostly using a printing press, it uses a printing press or similar later technology. There's a whole group of partially related articles that also has to go in here, if I can figure oout how to differentiate them.DGG 05:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  printing
Talk:Massachusetts Route 24

message: There was a big spending spree several years ago to upgrade 24 to Interstate standards.  They were attempting to have it designated part of 93.  This involved new guardrails, new signage, and other little "fancy" things that the highway didn't really need.
I'm not disputing it doesn't meet the standards, since I don't really know much about roadway standards.  What is it still missing, though?  Sahasrahla 18:41, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
:I'm not sure; it may be the exit and entrance ramps. Or maybe the info here is outdated. --SPUI (talk) 19:46, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah,  has some info. There are problems with ramps and bridges. Of course many of the Interstates aren't up to present standards either. --SPUI (talk) 19:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: South of 495, there are a lot of tight interchanges (small-radius clovers, short accel/decel lanes).  Kind of like Route 128 Peabody-Gloucester, except the road is straighter.  --Sam 16 Aug 2005.
===Highway Designation Between I-95 and I-93/Rt.24===
My guess is that MassDOT will probably call the section from I-95 to I-93 I-93 Spur. --Deweypants (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Interstate Standards

message: My guess is that MassDOT will probably call the section from I-95 to I-93 I-93 Spur. --Deweypants (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Highway Designation Between I-95 and I-93/Rt.24

message: I'm just curious - why have Rhode Island exits been added to this article?  Isn't there a separate article for RI 24?  Sahasrahla (talk) 04:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the MA 24 and RI 24 articles will be merged sometime in the future. Ed (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhode Island
Talk:List of place names of Native American origin in New England

message: This list seemed interesting at first, then turned tedious, and finally ended up being totally fascinating.  You have to read between the lines.  --Mothperson 3 July 2005 12:30 (UTC)
:Agreed. This is a really interesting list. Thε Halo Θ 17:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: yawn
Talk:Bill Barlee

message: *Not a copyvio. The mentioned site copied its content from the author's original site at MGC. The author, Michael Geoghegan, is adding content to the wikipedia article.
:Confirmed by email from noted site. --Duk 04:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: On the Boundary-Similkameen article, a Neville Langrell Barlee is listed as the NDP candidate.  Was this a relation?Skookum1 (talk) 00:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I just did a Google search on that name and found a Hansard transcript in which Bill Barlee was introduced to the House on his first day in 1988 as "Neville Langrell Barlee". So while I suppose there's a remote possibility that the 1969-72 Neville Langrell Barlee was his father or another relative of his with the same name, Occam's razor suggests otherwise — given that Bill himself was in his late 30s in 1969, we don't need to assume a second person into the equation the way we would if he'd only been in his teens. Bearcat (talk) 14:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Barlee

message: I was hoping to say a hello to Bill and thank him for some of my best memories as a kid gold mining on the Similikimeen (Friday Creek)
W Frisch  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.208.245 (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is he now??
Talk:Nauruan indigenous religion

message: Should this be Nauru-stub, Myth-stub, or Reli-stub?? Falphin 19:05, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Kastom is the more commonly used word to describe the range of myths and associated praxis. Merge? Paki.tv 08:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, Kastom does not specifically refer to Nauruan religion, in which case I would say that there should not be a merge. Orthogonal1 (talk) 07:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: This article definitely needs experts on polynesian religion and mythology. I could not access most of them since i did not major in one and most seemed to be from offline resources located in australia or hawaii.Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 03:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert needed
Category talk:Propaganda organizations

message: Why the hell is FOX News listed as a propaganda organization? It might have a bias, but it's certainly not run by the government. (unsigned anon IP 2005)
:I think that any group included in this category needs at least one WP:RS describing at as propaganda organization. I can think of a bunch that have been described thusly and could be included. CarolMooreDC 00:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for inclusion
Talk:Olhão

message: It's Olhão, not OlhÃo. Fix this bug please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.154.38.144 (talk) 
Inhabitants of Olhão are actually called Olhanense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.81.239.68 (talk) 14:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frazione

message: Italian Wiki, Talk page for "Frazione"; which matches the extent of my own (lesser) knowledge. Bill 19:30, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of initial article

message: I can read in the article « is roughly equivalent to "civil parishes" or "wards"». with wikilink to Ward (country subdivision)) , which is redirect to Ward (electoral subdivision).
But in Italy a "frazione" is generally not a electorial subdivision. It's simply a sub-municiplality subdivision, usually a small village which is not a Comune (municiplality) in its own. --Mezze stagioni (talk) 13:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Mezze stagioni (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ward?!
Talk:George Strickland Kingston

message: This article should be at George Kingston. I will move it unless someone can give me a reason not to. Adam 06:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I note that all incoming links are to George Strickland Kingston, and that the title of the book referenced under Further reading also uses "Strickland". I suspect that means the current situation is correct. --Scott Davis Talk 10:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

text: That's what I meant, yes. But I've listed all the evidence I have to support it. If community censensus is that the current George Kingston should become George Kingston (disambiguation) and George Strickland Kingston should become George Kingston, I'd accept it. --Scott Davis Talk 13:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move

message: None of the references appear to mention that Kingston picked up a dog in South America which then led him to find the River Torrens. Further investigation shows that none of the information in this edit in 2017 by  appears to be supported by the only reference used in that section, but is hinted by "Kingston's ability as a surveyor was frequently questioned and it was he who was spared to return to England in August 1837 to ask for reinforcements for the Survey Department."
 so could be true, if supported by more references. The same edit removed a reference which is now a dead link but I found it in the archives where it asserts that it was Light who was incompetent, saved by Kingston. --Scott Davis Talk 02:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Over a year later, I have removed the story of the dog and the assessment of competence. Happy to see them returned if neutral references are found. --Scott Davis Talk 13:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree about the dog but have added to the article some accurate material about competence with proper reference. GooglerW (talk) 11:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you --Scott Davis Talk 14:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donna the dog and Kingston's competence