lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Star Wars

message: Callumharte (talk) 04:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw you were able to edit on the main page. What is the point of this edit request?CRBoyer 04:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2024 

message: The redirect I have a bad feeling about this has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 03:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:I have a bad feeling about this]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Star Wars™ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Okmrman (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Star Wars™]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Under the header "Fictional timeline" on mobile devices (ie iPad Pro, 17.5.1, Safari, landscape) the two images are cropped right side, in both settings to mobile version same as to Desktop version. Turning to portrait only shifts the cropping a bit. Cropping appears for first image at about -45, for second image at 25.
Only downloading the images reveals their correct, much bigger size, no other possibilities are working. 2001:9E8:A5E4:6E00:CD85:2C78:F463:558F (talk) 14:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline images cropped
Talk:Sexism

message: Historical gender discrimination has deep roots, influenced by a complex interplay of factors such as societal norms, cultural traditions, and economic structures. One significant aspect contributing to discrimination is the historical assignment of roles based on perceived gender differences, where physical strength played a pivotal role.
In many ancient civilizations, the division of labor was often established along gender lines. Men, perceived as stronger, were assigned tasks that required physical prowess, such as hunting, agriculture, and heavy lifting. This distinction laid the foundation for a societal hierarchy, reinforcing the notion of men as dominant figures. This historical context framed expectations around gender roles, shaping cultural norms that persisted through generations.
The Agricultural Revolution further solidified gender roles, with men predominantly engaging in farming and women managing household duties. This division of labor not only reflected perceived strengths but also established a patriarchal structure where men held economic and decision-making power.
The Industrial Revolution marked a pivotal moment in history, transforming work dynamics and amplifying gender disparities. Factories and industries created separate spheres for men and women. Men were often assigned to labor-intensive tasks in factories, while women were confined to roles deemed more suitable for their perceived gentleness, such as textile work. This separation reinforced gendered expectations and limited opportunities for women in the professional sphere.
While women entered the workforce during the Industrial Revolution, they faced persistent wage gaps and limited career advancements. Discriminatory practices persisted, reflecting deeply ingrained biases from centuries past. The prevailing notion of women as primary caregivers and men as primary breadwinners continued to influence hiring decisions and workplace dynamics.
Historically, real incidents and narratives highlight the struggles faced by women. Suffrage movements in the late 19th and early 20th centuries sought to challenge these norms, advocating for women's rights and opportunities. Despite progress, gender discrimination remains entrenched in workplaces globally.
Efforts to address these disparities gained momentum in the 20th century, with movements advocating for equal pay, gender-neutral hiring practices, and the dismantling of traditional gender roles. While strides have been made, challenges persist, illustrating the enduring impact of historical gender discrimination on contemporary societies. Recognizing these historical roots is crucial for fostering lasting change, promoting gender equality, and creating inclusive workplaces for future generations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:7D58:2E00:845:E003:86F0:BC60 (talk) 06:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: 9 March 2024
Talk:Scheme

message: I have removed the words "in the future" from the first sentence of the article as they are inappropriate in the context of classification schemes. Looking at the other examples listed, it seems to me that those words are also inappropriate in most of their contexts. Misha Wolf (talk) 22:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in the future" 

message: Hi @Mathglot, as a result of your edit, the article now lists "URI scheme" twice, once under "Computing" and once under "See also". Misha Wolf (talk) 00:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; will fix. Mathglot (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

text: . Mathglot (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article now lists URI scheme twice, once under Computing and once under See also
Talk:Sacredness (comparative religion)

message: Shouldn't this be "sanctity" or "sacredness"? --Revolución (talk) 21:49, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: This page and the sanctity page both refer to holiness and are stubs.  In fact, the three terms are synonyms—see wikt:sacred and wikt:sanctity.  It seems silly to have three pages (viz Holiness, this, and Sanctity) when they all tend to the same subject, and only the first has any worthwhile content.—Red Baron 18:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Stephen King

message: The filmography lists IT Part 2 which mentions IT [part 1] but that isn't listed. Why? WordwizardW (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you see something you think needs fixing, fix it! Charlie Faust (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

text: King made a cameo in the sequel but didn't appear in the first film. The filmography isn't for listing the movies based upon King's works, unless he received some other credit for them. Jessintime (talk) 18:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The filmography lists IT Part 2 which mentions IT [part 1] but that isn't listed. Why?
Talk:Shot/reverse shot

message: I'm not sure about this language.
The way I've always seen it written, the sequence you describe is: shot--point-of-view shot--reaction shot.
A reverse angle, on the other hand, is a view from a camera set up 180 degrees opposite the initial one. You might have the camera behind a man as he walks towards the exit of a tunnel, then cut to a frontal shot of him as he steps into the sunlight.
What you're describing maybe some third thing, or maybe just another way of talking.
:Well if it's inaccurate, why not change it?  I just moved the material from Shot Reverse Shot; I don't necessarily vouch for it. --KQ
Yeah, my way-too-many-film-theory-classes also says that shot reverse shot is closer to what you're saying, and that the definition here is something else entirely. So I'm gonna go ahead and change it! Luvcraft 22:22, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do believe there should be a hyphen in this term... --Jeremy Butler 13:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shot-Reverse Shot
Talk:Rock paper scissors

message: I did some editing to the article, but I don't see how to edit the title of the article. I believe all three words of Rock Paper Scissors should be capitalized. It's debatable whether there should also be a comma or dash between the words, but at minimum they should be capitalized, since it is the name of the game. Source: I have been a freelance copy editor much of my adult life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balljuggler9 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As a rule, names of games are not capitalized - chess, tic-tac-toe etc. Hence, it would be Rock paper scissor in title, and rock paper scissors in running text - or perhaps hyphenated, if sources support that. There may be exceptions, however; e.g., Go is often capitalized. My inclination would be to revert your changes, but I'll refrain for now.--Nø (talk) 09:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalize name of the game 

message: In the rock-paper-scissors-fire-water variant, what do the fire and water gestures look like? I've tried searching but this vital information is surprisingly hard to find. 2A00:23C7:548F:C01:D4AF:E337:1EE4:2553 (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire and water 

message: The winner of the Netflix series "Squid Game: The Challenge" was determined by playing rock, paper, scissors winning $4.56 million dollars. 2601:641:500:3DA0:380B:47D6:EFC7:9785 (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squid Game: The Challenge 

message: Someone added this as an alternate name for the game, but it's just a joke from Regular Show. Should be removed. Firelily (talk) 23:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quartz, Parchment, Shears
Talk:Solar deity

message: Who George Carlin worships but doesn't pray to (that would be Joe Pesci). Wqwt (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture: George Carlin 

message: where is Amaterasu why isn't she mentioned Camillz (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amaterasu? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Venuss 444 (talk) 04:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Mythology
Talk:Science fiction on television

message: The history of US TV sci-fi here really does need expanding, in comparison to the British TV sci-fi section which I fleshed out a while back... I couldn't do the same with the US section because I don't know anything near as much about it. Is there anyone out there who can beef it up? Angmering 15:13, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, seeing as nobody else had, I did some research and wrote a US TV sci-fi section myself. It doesn't have as much context and background at the UK one, but I think I've had a fair stab at it. The downside is the page is now 38kb long as opposed to the recommended 32, but there isn't really much more that could really be added to it, so I don't see it growing to any more than this.Angmering 15:19, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: Some parts of the current article may be merged/synchronised with Science fiction film. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:46, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science fiction film 

message: There is sufficient ambiguity about Doctor Who's status as a science-fiction show that it is inappropriate for it to be used as a definitional programme in the lead, much less have its logo as the article's main picture.  Many class it as science fantasy or simply action-adventure.  Its record on injecting "science" into its fiction is spotty at best, downright dismissive at worst. I'm not saying the article shouldn't contain a reference to Doctor Who, or even a whole section, but holding it up as representative science fiction without proviso is highly contentious. 
Furthermore, classing Life on Mars as science fiction is incredibly misleading, given the ending details of that show. CzechOut 08:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From its beginning with William Hartnell Doctor Who has featured not only time travel (a subject which was good enough for H. G. Wells), but also robotics, mutations (Daleks), androids, space travel, and numerous other 'science' aspects of fiction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.162.158 (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Who and Life on Mars

message: 🪨 2806:2F0:4600:12BD:D5DB:66CA:9727:CE87 (talk) 18:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darck 2019 

message: The article states that Star Trek had the only conventions until the 1990s this patently false as Doctor Who began to have conventions beginning in the late 1970s and I'm aware other shows began to have them in at least the 1980s. Patrick Troughton died at one in the late 1980s. 5.133.47.240 (talk) 07:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conventions
Talk:Satan

message: Theistic Satanism section, caption of the first photo:
"The inverted pentagram, along with the Baphomet, is the most notable and widespread symbol of Satanism."
Saying "the Baphomet" is like saying "the Satan". I think it should be "the inverted pentagram, along with Baphomet, is the most notable..."
Thank you! 2A02:C7E:3188:4C00:D85C:BEB0:FF9F:5FA6 (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2024 

message: Are Atheistic Satanists also accused of worshipping Satan? 70.27.84.88 (talk) 00:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: LaVeyan Satanism is atheistic, believing in neither a personal god nor a personal devil. Moxy🍁 01:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations of worship
Talk:Summer solstice (disambiguation)

message: "Please note that this midsummer is not the middle of summer, if summer is defined as the warm time of year, because of delayed heating effect. Indeed, summer may be defined to begin with the summer solstice."
:I don't get this, is it being suggested that in the northern hemisphere it's hottest around 15 August? Does anyone have weather data to support this? Phil Plait's description seems more logical. - Jeandré, 2004-03-21t08:41z
On the winter page, it states that "Astronomically, it begins with the winter solstice.". 
Whereas on the Winter solstice page, it states that "In some reckonings, the winter solstice is the first day of winter"
Both descriptions are correct, but is it possible to make these two articles allign better? --Kelby 21:34, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: hmm... i happen to live in such country ... here in Poland, summer starts on June 21st/22nd..., autumn on September 22nd/23rd, winter on December 21st/22nd, and spring on March 20th/21st... - Blueshade 23:55, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Beginning or middle of season?

message: It is a little bit of a stretch to say that "people in the northern hemisphere" were the ones who discovered the solstices.  There is evidence of advanced civilizations in South America that also, according to calendaric evidence; show that Olmec, Mayan, Aztecs and Incas probably understood these as well. ----Julien Deveraux 17:08, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Holidays

message: The summary states that the June solstice occurs on June 21/22 but the table of dates and times shows it's on June 20/21. Please could someone who knows the correct dates fix this? Chardir 10:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The dates and times in the table are correct, but state the time in UTC. Depending of the time zone you live in, the time on your clock at the event may be up to 12 hours later or earlier, effectively ending up on a different date. You might want to extend the range in the summary. minus;Woodstone 12:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: June 20/21/22

message: This should absolutely not be a dab page.  The two albums don't not make equal precedence for the summer solstice.  The rest are specific celebrations of the summer solstice.  Arguments against making this a redirect to solstice?  Cburnett 18:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No arguments here, as I have spent a fair amount of time doing dab updates on other pages from "summer solstice" to "solstice."  I do think that eventually, people will wonder why there is a winter solstice page and no summer solstice page.  Maybe winter solstice should be merged with solstice and turned into a redirect as well?Dkreisst 08:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dab page 
Talk:Steampunk

message: How is Back to the Future 3 not mentioned? Crazytonyi (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that says it relates to steampunk? Its own article doesn't say anything. Dhtwiki (talk) 04:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's my question too. Unless there is a reliable source saying that the show is steampunk (like a bunch of articles in the case of Disenchantment for example), then it shouldn't be added. --Historyday01 (talk) 13:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Back to the Future 3''

message: I don't see anything steampunk-ish on those early Ozuka manga, same with Future Boy Conan and Space Battleship Yamato, they would fit better as retrofuturism IMO, the futuristic tech on those works just look old fashioned so they kinda fit on steampunk but then a lot more works should be included in the article Mirad1000 (talk) 12:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think series can be on here if they are steampunk-ish. I mean, Polygon notes "where Castle in the Sky riffs off a steampunk aesthetic, Conan is all about ’70s retrofuturism, building a vibrant visual language of slick teal spacesuits, tangerine seaplanes, and beeping computer rooms". But, I can agree that more works should be added to the article. Arguably Unicorn: Warriors Eternal falls into the steampunk genre as well: "a 10-episode mini-series...[is] the supernatural steampunk animated action series". Historyday01 (talk) 14:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Steampunk 

message: I don't see any reason to remove archive links like this, they might be useful at some point. Is there a reason, ? —DIYeditor (talk) 09:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not useful in causing archiving to happen, and, when added in massive amounts, result in possibly considerably longer download and rendering times. When editors, or IABot (which only adds links in such cases), have determined that the original links have died, then archive links can be useful, although it's preferable to determine why the links have died (possibly due to website reorganization, where the original material exists and can be linked to) and whether better references now exist (e.g. with updated information). Dhtwiki (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. I thought it was forcing an archival at the same time. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I add archival links all the time, as webpages change often, and I'd say its important to keep a static page for people to access when (and if) a link has died. Historyday01 (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing archive links?
Talk:Schizophrenia

message: This article has 'Paranoid schizophrenia' as a link at the bottom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoid_schizophrenia which redirects you back here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.86.207 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note.  It looks like it's in the WP:NAVBOX called Template:Mental disorders.  I'll take care of it.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good stuff, thanks 92.25.45.1 (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paranoid schizophrenia leads back to here 

message: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2023/schizophrenia-extreme-heat-health-risk/ says that people with schizophrenia have weaker thermoregulation, and that antipsychotics make it even easier to overheat.  I wonder whether this should be mentioned in this article, perhaps under Schizophrenia#Prognosis.   It sounds like schizophrenia + homelessness + climate change = risk of death from Heat illness. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heat illness risk 

message: I would like to add cat ownership as a risk factor. See meta-analysis in Schizophrenia Bulletin: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbad168. SigTif (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Meta-Analysis: Cats and Schizophrenia 

message: At the positive symptoms, change "(...) or inappropriate affect. typically regarded as manifestations of psychosis." to (...) or inappropriate affect, typically regarded as manifestations of psychosis." 86.104.16.229 (talk) 12:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 12:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024
Talk:Steve Wozniak

message: If he lives in Tasmania, why is this information not mentioned in the current version of this article? 
     ^
     |
he doesn't 
173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tasmania]]

message: According to Chapter My Big Idea in iWOZ: (i) WESCON was being held on June 16-18, 1975 (ii) Chuck Peddle was peddling the chips (iii) Steve Wozniak bought a few for $20 (iv) a couple of days later at a regular meeting of the Homebrew Computer Club, a number of us excitedly showed the 6502 microprocessors we'd bought (v) Steve Wozniak borrowed thirty-two SRAM chips from an HP colleague (vi) on Sunday, June 29, 1975, it was the first time in history... The problem is, according to most sources, the WESCON during which MOS microprocessors were sold to the public was held in mid September and company Sphere presented their microcomputer with TV output and keyboard there. According to second page of Homebrew Computer Club Newsleter dated July 5, 1975, Sphere "with interface for standard TV" and a keyboard was already advertised at that time. According to first page of Homebrew Computer Club Newsleter dated September 20, 1975, "the Sphere group took time out from Wescon and demonstrated their equipment at the meeting. Along with their Sphere 1 computer system they demonstrated a very impressive color graphics display". It seems unlikely that Steve Wozniak was the first engineer who had a working prototype of hobbyist microcomputer with TV output and a keyboard interface. JanSuchy (talk) 16:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first time in history 

message: His greatgrandparents patrnal side (Wozniak/Krus) came 1870 from Posen, Prussia, to Michigan, maternal side (Kern/Volz) 1877 from Baden, German empire. His grandmother (Miller) had ancestors from Switzerland. 2003:E7:AF19:6C05:64D0:3C39:F853:E20B (talk) 16:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy 

message: In light of Wozniak's recent reception of Serbian citizenship, multiple editors have been involved in changing the opening sentence of the article between  and  or . In my own revert, I asserted that . Wozniak is by no means an exception, numerous notable individuals have been granted Serbian or another country's citizenship without actually living and becoming notable there. Think Steven Seagal, he is an American, not an American–Russian–Serbian film personality. In conclusion, I think that 'American' should be restored.  –Vipz (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentence Serbian citizenship dispute
Talk:Sydney

message: I’m a fairly new editor and i want to make a request for a change in the Info Box topic from Australian Place to Settlement Place, this topic seems to be a lot more professional and understanding, it provides more information such as the economic and population status, as well as more sufficient fields and descriptions. It seems like most major cities across the world have this topic on their wikipedia pages for their information boxes, please reply if you think this change would improve the Sydney wikipedia article and maybe other major city wikipedia pages in Australia. Frazerater (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australia place infobox is designed for Australian cities and towns. What information do you think needs to be added to the infobox? Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 02:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Box Topic Change from Australian Place to Settlement Suggestion