lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of renewable energy organizations

message: A SCHOOL CALLED ECOTECH OPENED IN AURORA, COLORADO IN 2010. I BELIEVE IT SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE "LIST OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SCHOOLS". THANK YOU.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.222.72 (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  LIST OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SCHOOLS 

message: See www.teslasociety.com gLOBAL ENERGY INDEPPENDENCE DAY Its also Birthday celebration of EENERGY PIONEER NIKOLA tTESLA (1856-1943) REMBERE GLOBAL ENERGY INDEPPENDENCE AND REMEBER NIKOLA TESLA TOO THANKS! Dr. Edson Andre' Johnson D.D. ULC  Founder Global Energy Indepependence Day "AN EARTH DAY FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY"!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.250.211.137 (talk) 23:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remember Jul.10th Tenth Ann.gLOBAL ENERGY INDEPEPNDENCE DAY!
Talk:Anti-nuclear movement in Germany

message: This was 2007 - seven years ago. Is it still important? I think we need a sperate article for anti–nuclear power movement. --Fmrauch (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes:  This article is seriously out of date.  It includes, "Block-B is going back online after a year-long shutdown on December 13 or 14, 2007 and is scheduled to keep operating until 2009 or 2012."  This describes events scheduled to occur almost a decade ago.  Can someone update this? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

message: This current text includes, "In 1980 an Enquete Commission of the Bundestag":  What's "Enquete Commisison"?  Is this a "Commission of Inquiry"?  It sounds like a poor translation.  
However, the footnote is not on the web and not easily checked.  
??? DavidMCEddy (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's "Enquete Commission"?
Talk:Croft Castle

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: - Hi, Lajmmoore, I've done a bit of a tidy-up and reordering here. It's BY NO MEANS the finished article, but it's probably enough to justify removal of the  tag. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much @KJP1 is looks so much better! Lajmmoore (talk) 12:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Passaic-class monitor

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: " Later improvements included... rings fitted around the turret and pilot houses to prevent their pivoting machinery from being jammed by shot."
This is poorly phrased and may be as a result of persistent confusion over the nature of knocked-out turrets on Passaic-class ships in the Battle of Charleston. There was never any indication that machinery damage resulted in such a manner that it could be prevented by the application of armour rings around the bases of the turrets or pilot houses. Any derangement of machinery would be the result of solid bows against the turret jarring the machinery inside through shock; extra armour at the base would have no influence on this phenomenon one way or the other - shock of impact is still shock of impact.
As Reed and Eads both made clear in their criticism of the Ericsson-type monitors, the matter was with the base ring upon which the turrets sat, coupled with the softness of the iron produced in the early 1860s. Any solid impact against the turret sides was liable, as Reed explains, to create deformation and spreading downwards of the iron plate. This would then create a point of impingement upon the turret's bearing ring such as to create an insurmountable degree of friction, requiring such force from the turning machinery of the turret as to gouge the brass ring if rotation were to be achieved. The friction was, of course, far too great for the machinery to overcome, resulting in jams from solid blows to the base of the turret side.
(Eads cautioned against the use of deck-mounted bearing rings as seen on Ericsson's ships on the basis that any twisting of the hull - associated with normal sea service - would warp the plane of the bearing ring and similarly create a point of friction which the drivetrain could not overcome - Reed discusses this.)
The actual reason for the applique armour rings on the outside of the turret base of Passaic-class monitors (as well as pilot houses) was to absorb the deformation resulting from such shots and to confine the spreading to an area which was both outboard of the ring and clear of the deck itself, thus preventing any impingement upon the bearing plane or resultant jamming. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:6CB5:2010:4049:EE92 (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applique armour rings
Talk:Until I Die

message: I have reverted the table back to just the two chart positions for two reasons. First, the Romanian and Polish references don't have archives. After the songs exits these charts, other users won't be able to verify the song's chart positions. Second, according to a discussion conducted at WP:Record charts, only charts from the world's largest markets should be included. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charts table
Talk:Six Months in a Leaky Boat

message: zgeek doesn't seem like a trustyworthy source. The link is dead for me right now - takes me to the zgeek front page rather than forums.
220.233.71.159 (talk) 00:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the author of that original article, I concur. Editors should be using original sources like I did, instead of going with the first link they Googled. Adding citation needed to the paragraph. ewe2 (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the sources on the song being banned for the following reasons;
* The first cite I removed is a personal blog from a dead website.
* The second cite I removed is a list compiled from emails gathered from random people on a personal website.
Neither of these are a reliable sources that Wikipedia should be citing.
--Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Banned' sources
Talk:Jim Green (activist)

message: In the education-part of the info box it says that the person has a PhD, but the text says he "was awarded", wording which I interpret as him receiving an honorary title. Which one is correct? --MoRsE (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not an honorary title. Details of his PhD thesis are given on the page: Department of Science & Technology Studies, University of Wollongong, 1997. Johnfos (talk) 20:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Degree

message: Can we get some citations from the report? All we have here is second hand claims from an article penned by Green. The article cited doesn't even link the report. 118.211.6.168 (talk) 10:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  BEIR report
Talk:Niuweidao

message: I've checked the image in this article, and it's not the sword it purports to show. The sword shown is a Liu Ye Dao or Liuyedao ('Willow leaf sabre'), a different type of single-edged dao. Though they may have looked similar, there is currently no image of a Niuweidao sword in Wikimedia Commons. How to proceed ? Should the image be moved to the Liuyedao article, just in case ? --ZemplinTemplar (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you read the descriptions of the two types of sword? This image doesn't match how a liuyedao is described at all. It has a broad blade that flares outward, like a niuweidao. The image is mistitled, that's all. Actually, I don't think we should be using these amateur illustrations anyway. Since the Metropolitan Museum made a bunch of their imagery public domain recently, I can upload some of those as examplars of each type of sword. --diff (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

text: The liuyedao article has now been updated with a representative antique example from the Met. I wasn't able to find a good PD image of a niuweidao (the closest I've found was a proto-niuweidao with less distinctive characteristics), so the illustration will have to do. I did however request that the image and its derivatives be renamed to avoid confusion, which has been done. --diff (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Niuweidao image
Talk:Wake the Sleeper

message: During yesterdays live concert at the Matrix, Bochum, Germany, Mick Box said multiple times that the album would be available March 2008 (not January as is mentioned here), delayed based on decisions of the record company. 80.142.184.30 (talk) 10:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't understand why this page seems like an advertisement. I always try to make sure that all articles I create are from a neutral point of view. What are the reasons for this claim? BTC 18:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert
Talk:HMS Chrysanthemum (1917)

message: It seems web references 1, 2 and 3 don't work anymore. Should we delete them? Sv1xv (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References not working 
Talk:Bellmont High School

message: I undoing an edit regarding notable alumni. To state the standard of notability as only those with a wiki page is nonsense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oshaberi (talk • contribs) 17:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have also added a number of references and will do more later. As a result, I have removed the one source tag at the top of the article. If anyone else can help with online references for previous athletic accomplishments and so forth, I would be appreciative.Oshaberi (talk) 17:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Goodrich Castle

message: William fitzOsbern leads to a man who died in 1071, and thus could not possibly have been the same man who seized the castle in 1144. 81.158.2.171 (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, thanks for highlighting that. I think it's probably William Fitz Osbern (1196), so I've changed the link. Nev1 (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect wikilink

message: In the recent GA review, the question was asked about Mary Byfield's date of death. She died in 1876, aged 81, apparently. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added that to the image description. Malleus Fatuorum 17:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I think its an improvement - looks cleaner and neater. I'd have thought that the original copyright is covered by the existing license, so provided the new changes (your contribution) are recorded and released, you'd be ok, but I'll admit I'm no expert. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engraver... 

message: I've cleaned up the scanned image and produced this. I thought I'd check here whether it is thought to be an improvement.  I don't think I need to add an extra licence for my changes but, if so, could someone point me in the right direction, please? Cavrdg (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its an improvement - looks cleaner and neater. I'd have thought that the original copyright is covered by the existing license, so provided the new changes (your contribution) are recorded and released, you'd be ok, but I'll admit I'm no expert. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up image
Talk:Abbakhel

message: I believe this article has potential and importance, I think it needs time to allow the author to let it grow into a more fruitful article!Jayson (talk) 03:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential and Importance
Talk:The South Bank Show

message: It's quite deceptive to say it is seen in Australia--I've seen all of two episodes, exclusively broadcast as documentaries on the subject. When Panorama is screened here as Four Corners the broadcaster lets the audience assume it's been produced by them--of late the Panorama reporters seem to make a habit of using the phrase "But Panorama has...". MartinSFSA (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not seen in Australia 

message: The link "high art" links to a film of the same title, rather than the intended content.
Mattybhoy 69 (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it since in quotes it is arch, sounds like high art is bad (c.f. Highbrow, or search "ars longa, vita brevis). SimonTrew (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: Tim Burton was featured on the show in January of 2008.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2407:7000:9B3B:6140:D914:4540:F12E:A6ED (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tim Burton
Talk:Pembina Institute

message: :They have argued the position that uranium mines are bad because they causes pollution that renders caribou meat from nearby herds unsafe for one-year-old children to consume in large quantities.Uranium mining Pembina Institute, (May 2007) page 3 accessed 2008-02-22
I have removed this sentence as it really isn't a policy position, is poorly worded, and appears to be pushing a narrow POV... Johnfos (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's my difficulty.  I can't find anything in the ref that doesn't push a narrow POV.  So far as I can tell, it is completely devoid of any balance from the title on. Perhaps you can see what I can't?  In the long version of the ref the source document they drew from is cited as ref 100:  LeadSongDog (talk) 14:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Perhaps this or this or this (I'm sure we can chase out the original publications.)LeadSongDog (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence from Policy Positions section

message: We must remain aware of where the Pembina Institute gets some of its funding. By this I mean the conflict the Institute must be in for accepting money from Suncor. This is a documented fact yet the Pembina Institute tries to bury the truth by editing out the references I provide.http://www.pembina.org/reports/Suncor-Final.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julianlawrence (talk • contribs) 16:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Suncor Connection 

message: Regarding this section: "The Pembina Institute is primarily funded by a range of project-specific grants, event sponsorships (including those from energy companies such as Suncor, Shell and Bullfrog Power) and individual donations. To a lesser degree, the Institute performs fee-for-service research and advising to government and industry."
''
Why is fee-for-service research and advising prefixed as "To a lesser degree"? It seems like this is presented this way to distract from the significance of this area of their work.
From most recent annual report (2016):
* Fee for service: $714,111 - Revenue received under contractual agreements for completing research and advisory services.
* Donations from individuals: $69,024 - Individual responses to direct mail appeal and other gifts from individuals.
Fee for service is a much more significant source of funding than individual donations.
It is a minor difference in words, but it is bizarre that this area of their work is being minimized as a source of funding. Is it worth changing?
--DanPublicPolicy (talk) 15:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funding
Talk:Secure64 Software

message: I added reference to WSJ article.Angus77 (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have a (very very mild) WP:COI issue with this article, though it's more social than financial. 
--- tqbf 23:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI disclaimer 

message: I have redirected Secure64 and Secure64 DNS to this page, Secure64 DNS was a one sentence article, also pasted that in to here.  Probably needs to be cleaned up a bit.  --SnakeSeries (talk) 03:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects
Talk:Longtown Castle

message: I've gone through and given the article a bit of a scrub. I've updated the sources to the most recent works and added a map. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion... 

message: This article is now completely out of date and has been superceded by the results of a 3 year Heritage Lottery Funded archaeology and documentary research project at the Castle 2015-2018. The project has shown that the Norman Castle was indeed superimposed on the ramparts of a Roman fort, dated by pottery finds and radiocarbon methods to the second half of the first century. The Roman ramparts, made from piled-up turf, were never replaced in stone, so the fort was probably abandoned some time in the second century AD.
The project has also shown that the stone keep replaced the earlier wooden one around 1150, probably by Gilbert de Lacy, Lord of Ewyas at that time. The stone bailey wall was erected at the same time, although the cross wall and gatehouse, dividing the western bailey is of later construction, probably early 13th century.
The English Heritage website entry for Longtown Castle has now been updated to include the above information. We are happy to do the same for the Wikipedia entry.
Regards,  The Longtown Castles Project Team --Mungoherdman (talk) 10:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update required to Longtown Castle entry
Talk:Alluwali

message: It is the peacefull city.people are living happily.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.68.98.135 (talk) 10:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Viva Koenji!

message: I have conflicting reports of whether track 6 is Brahggo or Cembell Rotta. And I don't just mean in which order, I mean the same length tracks just with different labels. Anyone have the back cover to confirm? --Closedmouth (talk) 05:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked someone with a physical copy and apparently Musicbrainz is correct. Fixing now. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track order
Talk:Cuthwine of Leicester

message: Oddly enough, I cannot find any mention of Cuthwine in the lists of bishops at the end of the Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Neither does he have an entry on the PASE website. – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 13:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: He probably got "disappeared" between the second edition of the Handbook of British Chronology and the third. I was going to get any of those deleted, but the first one I tried to do got "kept" because he WAS mentioned in the second edition even though later editions didn't include him. After that, I gave up. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I found another reference in this article by D. P. Kirby (page 2, second paragraph), which mentions the chronicle of Florence of Worcester as a primary source. But it's quite an old article (1965–6), and the edition of Florence's he refers to is even older (it's Thorpe's, which does mention a Cuthwinus as first bishop of Leicester). It would be good to have a look at more recent sources. Too bad that the relevant volume in the Anglo-Saxon Charters isn't published yet. – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Cuthwine 

message: Many of these early office-holders do not seem to me to merit a dedicated page, when nothing is known about them, except their dates of tenure. For anyone interested, these can simply be checked on the list displayed in the Bishop of Lincoln page. Valetude (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen

message: Because in the revised treaty it looks like it might be Article 28 ("Quantitive restrictions on imports and all measures having equivilant effect shall be prohibited between Member States") instead of Article 25 ("Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.")...
This is from the latest version of the treaty.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.149.127.101 (talk) 23:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The case originally turned on Art. 12 EEC, which reads "Member States shall refrain from introducing between themselves any new customs duties on imports and exports or any charges having equivalent effect, and from increasing those which they already apply in their trade with each other.", so yes, that has now been replaced by Art. 25 EC. The Court held that the reclassification of urea-formaldehyde into a higher tarif category was equivalent to increasing a customs duty, and so illegal. Physchim62 (talk) 06:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

text: My knowledge of the history is a bit sketchy as to when it happened, but wasn't the original article heading towards the free trade of goods between Member States - something that was achieved a while back, meaning that the original article is not really applicable now? 81.23.50.232 (talk) 10:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this definitely Article 25? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Swimmer504 (talk) 02:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Legal Europe
Talk:St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital

message: No mention is made of Manning getting paid for his marketing help, but I'm told by a source at the hospital that he has a deal similar to the one his brother Eli had with a hospital in New York. Eli's deal was exposed when that hospital went bankrupt. For the sake of accuracy and honesty, the nature of Manning's relationship to St. Vincent should be explained. Nicmart (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Manning's "strong relationship" with St. Vincent
Talk:Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

message: Statements in this entry confuse the IU Health system (formerly Clarian Health) with the single instance of Methodist Hospital (which is just one hospital in the system and only one hospital in the Indianapolis campus). Methodist Hospital has a rich history in Indianapolis and deserves a better entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaireeodell (talk • contribs) 22:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflates "Methodist Hospital" with "IU Health"
Talk:Indianapolis motorcycle Grand Prix

message: Every one of the NASCAR races include their sponsors in the name. So do most other types of races, what makes this article special? HoosierStateTalk 21:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the Motorcycle Grand Prix articles have the sponsor in the title. Chris Ssk talk 01:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name