Talk:Malik-Shah I

message: How come so little information is provided on Malik Shah I. I don't know anything about this, but quite a significant figure and empire, isn't it?--Xactnoreg (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I like this figure and empire, too. But, sorry, I don't have source about this topic. I hope other peoples will improve this article.Ti2008 (talk) 12:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It reads:Malik Shah expanded Seljuk power into Syria at the expense of the Fatimids of Egypt, setting up client princes in Edessa, Aleppo and Damascus. What were these principalities ? Were they the beyliks ? If so, there were many in Anatolia, like Danishmends, Saltukids, etc.  ?  But conventionally, they were either called as beylik in Turkish or emirate in Arabic. If these principalities were the Crusader principalities than the information is irrevelant here. Because, Crusades were later than Malik Shah's death. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They aren't the crusader ones (they never ruled Aleppo or Damascus). Are these the territories ruled by Tutush, Duqaq, Ridwan, etc? Adam Bishop (talk) 22:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Principality" seems like a perfectly reasonable English rendition of "emirate," so long as we're speaking informally rather than using official names. john k (talk) 07:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princes ? 

message: Why does this guy HistoryofIran thinks he owns this page or something, acting all high and mighty. I gave you sources for you to look at and you throw them at garbage, I take this as an insult on my dignity.
Do you even care to share information for this great man, all I wanted was to put his REAL NAME, which included work, yes work, I finally founded his real name after week. RussianDewey (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  True name of Sultan Malik-Shah and restoring info-box 

message: I'm keen to understand why you've removed the Turkish spelling of this name () yet allowed the Persian to remain. Considering this person was from the Seljuk Empire (a Turko-Persian Sunni Muslim empire), I believe the inclusion of both spellings is quite acceptable --  samtar talk or stalk 12:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , could you provide reliable sources that back up the claim that they (the Seljuks) spoke the modern-day Turkish language, and wrote it in the Latin script, specifically the language/script that the Republic of Turkey officially uses since 1923? Because thats literally what the sock IP added to the lede; the transliteration of the name in the post-1923 language of the Republic of Turkey, in the Latin script. If yes, we'd be more than happy to include it. Btw, people have been over this matter many times, please see some of the previous discussions here on this very same talk page. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also suggest looking at the further revision history of this page, as well as on the main page of the Seljuk Empire, just to see how many sockmasters/socks have been doing this for a while now. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the reply - I've had a look over some related discussions. I asked as someone had popped onto IRC and queried it - I couldn't see any immediate reason why it should be removed so I thought I'd leave you a message. It now seems likely this was one of the socks you mentioned and I was taken in by them - apologies  Out of interest, I assume Seljuks did not use Latin script Turkish? --  samtar talk or stalk 07:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

text: This is a well-established rule in entire wiki, see Avicenna as an example. -- Mazandar (talk) 03:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Turkish spelling 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: We sure that Abbasid Caliphate was a state, not like a governmental body inside Seljuks. Did they ever conquer Baghdad? Asking because I don't know it. Beshogur (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Tughril Beg occupied Baghdad in 1055. Unless the Seljuks lost it before Malik-Shah's death then I would make his place of death, Seljuk Empire. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Kansas Bear ^^. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbasid Caliphate, death place