Talk:Constitution of Iran

message: The writer of this article has political and religious bias. Farhoudk 21:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: A link has been added for Mullahcracy in the "See Also" section. Please see  for the full discussion on why this term is a POV neologism. Moreover, this term is in violation of WP:NEO, it states: "neologisms should be avoided in articles". I will remove the link unless there are objections. Agha Nader 20:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mullahcracy link 

message: Does anyone have a copy of the 1979 version of the constitution (without the 1989 amendments)?  I think that would be a good reference for people studying the history of constitutions in the Republic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Throckmorton Guildersleeve (talk • contribs) 16:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1979 Constitution 

message: I think the date of 24 October is wrong, since the referendum was on 10 and 11 of Azar in 1358.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neshat23 (talk • contribs) 05:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Iranian constitutional referendum, December 1979 says that the referendum to approve the constitution was on December 2 and 3. —howcheng  {chat} 17:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adoption Date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004120826/http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/ir00000_.html to http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/ir00000_.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130819052822/http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/Government/constitution.html to http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/Government/constitution.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This "society" provides almost no information on itself on its website. There is nothing about where it is based (no postal address; whois says its domain is registered in Toronto but that's via a privacy service so it's not reliable), who its members are, or what its editorial policies are (those policies are mentioned but not defined). I would consider it a self-published source since this lack of information gives it no accountability whatsoever. Surely a more reliable source is available for citing the constitution of Iran. Hairy Dude (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran Chamber Society 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User:Ms131313/sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 17:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Balag12/sandbox/Iran Consti rewrite or its previous edit by User:Balag12 may also be helpful.  – Fayenatic London 17:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft  

message: am attempting to expand the article to include summaries on almost all the constitution's articles but keep it shorter than the Constitution itself. 
in addition am adding observations on the Constitution by scholars or authors under headings "commentary" to distinguish it from the summaries of the content of the Constitution itself --Louis P. Boog (talk) 12:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 edits 

message: 2600:1700:db70:6d20:7194:9382:406a:4449 removed comment re Esperanto#Islam but with no indication that they have looked at it.
The Esperanto#Islam article quotes something that the Ayatolla Khomeini said and did.
Also 2600:1700:db70:6d20:7194:9382:406a:4449 say not right way to make a comment with no details about right way. ----MountVic127 (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esperanto#Islam 

message: Is there a good reason why Article 37 is out of order and lies between 27 and 29? ----MountVic127 (talk) 05:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Articles 27, 37, 29