lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard Standing

message: Of the productions listed, only one (Casualty) actually matches with Standing's filmography on IMDB and one of them (Passion of the Christ 2:Crucify This) is a joke from Family Guy.  Since all the information was added by the same anon this means there is no reason to think any of the content is accurate. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Illbleed

message: http://www.gamershell.com/static/screenshots/4348/70793_full.jpg
-- a possible screenshot for the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.93.27 (talk) 04:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Moved to talk, this seems to be trivia RJFJR (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistakes
Talk:African Union of Railways

message: The article sometimes has a tone I might describe as "prescriptive" instead of "descriptive". In other words, it often reads like a standards manual or an action plan. See phrases like these:
* Because of dangers imposed by wild animals such as lions, manual control of loops turnouts is not necessarily a good idea, and some degree of automation of these turnouts, and fencing, is desirable.
* A simplified language such as seaspeak would be useful to reduce such problems.
* The structure gauge of tunnels and bridges needs to be about 1 m (3.28 ft) taller.
I don't really know enough about the subject to feel comfortable fixing it.
Tom Haws (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not encyclopedic in tone
Talk:Axle load

message: I think the smaller article Axleload should be merged into this one, according to Help:Merging. Seems like it would be a disadvantage to have similar but different information split over 2 pages. It would then make sense to expand this out to discuss truck axle loads, etc, so to make it cover all uses of the term. How does this sound to everybody?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RAILS (talk • contribs) 00:39, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I went and did it. Hope nobody minds after the fact, but it really makes sense to not have 2 duplicates. Rails (talk) 00:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Crane rails on shipping wharfs have heavy loads on them. ----MountVic127 (talk) 08:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crane Rails
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Command & Conquer Red Alert Infantry

message: you didn't put a deletion tag on the Command & Conquer Red Alert Naval Units.--Taida 18:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: ...they're completely gone, aren't they?  Entirely, and utterly decimated and purged from the system?  If I had known they were going to be completely purged from the system, I would have taken down copies...  But now I don't have that chance, do I?  All that information is now lost.  That information could have been used in the Command & Conquer Wikipedia I was planning on making.  But now, thanks to you...you...  ...WikiNazis...  ...I have nothing...
Congratulate yourselves.  Your job is done and your precious Wikipedia is no longer tainted with "trivial game information".
--Joseph Collins 15:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which website is the command and conquer wiki? Maybe they already have this information.--Taida 16:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no Command & Conquer Wiki.  I was going to make one.  But now, I don't see the point seeing as a lot of the information -- information I don't have access to outside of here -- is gone. --Joseph Collins 01:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should have transwikied these articles before those WikiNazi Deletionists deleted everything.--Taida 02:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's All Gone... 

message: Or, um, not. Joseph, I already offered on your talk page to provide you with copies of the articles so they could be put on a game wiki. Same offer applies to you, Taida. Please let me know via my talk page. Proto<I><B>/</B>/</I><B>/</B>type 06:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm a big nazi 

message: I just googled C&C Wiki and turns out there is a C&C Wiki.
*http://cnc.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page --Taida 17:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jesus Christ, I feel like an ass now...  If I'd know about this before-hand, I wouldn't've said word one about the whole deletion thing.  Funny thing is, I did Google for said Wiki, but somehow turned up nothing.  >_<  Ugh... --Joseph Collins 00:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a C&C Wiki
Talk:Wells Fargo Plaza (Houston)

message: Anybody want to explain this one to me?--Loodog 03:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subterranean open-air? 
Talk:Buffer (rail transport)

message: The only refence to buffer locking I have been able to find so far is this. Peter Horn User talk 14:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is better Peter Horn User talk 17:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffer lock 

message: British Rail Class 73#Couplings mentions "retractible buffers" and they are implied on British Railways Mark 1 as well as on dual coupling. Could someone clarify this? Peter Horn User talk 17:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @User:Redrose64 Perhaps you could a section Buffer (rail transport)#Retractable buffers to the article Peter Horn User talk 17:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retractable buffers
Talk:Palindromic prime

message: if any one has a short logic for printing a series of palindromic number please write it down here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.63.186.134 (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: attention

message: "It is not known if there are infinitely many palindromic primes in base 10" seems to conflict with "it is known that, for any base, almost all palindromic numbers are composite". Either there is only a cofinite set of palindrome primes (i.e. allmost all palindrome numbers are composite), or there may be an infinite number of palindrome primes, or I'm misunderstanding something (which is why I write on the discussion page instead of editing the article). It would be great if anybody more fluent in number theory than me could resolve this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.104.69.237 (talk) 11:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Almost all" is a technical term in mathematics.  In this case, although the reference would have to be checked (both for what it says and for its reliability, I think it's saying that the limit as n goes to infinity of the number of palindromic primes less than n to the number of palindromes less than n is 0. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 15:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. The article says "it is known that, for any base, almost all palindromic numbers are composite". Note there is a link on almost all. Wikipedia articles often link terms to another article explaining more about them although the precise meaning here is not explicitly explained in almost all. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that almost all integers are composite in general, for the right mathematical definition of "almost all". So is this saying anything more restrictive? 67.151.97.194 (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen the paper but as stated here, it's not more restrictive than for all integers. But it's still worth mentioning that it holds for palindromes in any base. It's what most people would probably have guessed, but it had to be proved. There are many other integer sequences where it's expected but hasn't been proved that almost all numbers are composite. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

text: I have added an explanation. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Jobu0101 (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  infinitely many palindromic primes 

message: Longest palindromic prime updated Jan 2024 - https://t5k.org/top20/page.php?id=53 
I don’t know math well enough to confidently edit the article sorry
2600:1700:F4D1:D70:8435:B49C:FA7A:E19E (talk) 01:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest palindromic prime
Talk:Panzerfaust Magazine

message: I'm uncomforatably close to WP:AUTO for this subject, but here's couple things:
Campaign was originally a separate history magazine, that had... one issue before financial issues closed it down. I think it took a while for the hope of starting it again to go away, as it was ~3 years before Panzerfaust was renamed Panzerfaust and Campaign (#71). A little while later, the name was changed to Campaign (#79).
Oh, and the size changed a few times (I can think of four different physical formats for different presses), ending up as a full 8 1/2"x11" saddle stich with issue #77. --Rindis 16:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few details... 
Talk:American Institute of Graphic Arts

message: This article appears to have been taken directly from the organization's promotional material, reading like an advert.  Needs a clean-up to remove biased language and also could probably use additional independent references (other than just the organization's web site). Dugwiki 19:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well, its been over 3 years, and the page is still overly promotional, wiht little referenced historical content. i have a publication of theirs "50 books of the year 1963", which is a nice ref for this long running contest. ill try to add this and remove the promomaterial. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads as advert for organization 

message: I created a working link to this page from The Very Hungry Caterpillar, because the book received an award from AIGA according to one of the (credible) references. I'd like the page to show what category of award it got since the article is rated of top importance for the children's literature portal because of the book's global significance. Kathybramley (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is a notable book (i worked in the book business). It doesnt appear in the linked article on winners. Is it that a person wins, or that a book wins? Access to a print catalog of winners would be better. if anyone finds one, please consider growing this article and the list of winners.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Hungry Caterpilar 

message: — Assignment last updated by Antje Gamble (talk) 23:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Modern Design
Talk:Battle of the Sound

message: According to the 8th line: "...the English, whose powerful fleet had recently defeated the Dutch in the First Anglo-Dutch War" the English had defeated the Dutch in the First Anglo-Dutch War, yet there seem to have been no decisive victors, for the English had failed to achieve their wargoal.
See: First Anglo-Dutch War
84.84.50.147 (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partiality concerning the victor of the First Anglo-Dutch War. 
Talk:E-flat clarinet

message: Idr6ftg7yuhijo did a fairly extensive edit, cleaning up some typos, reorganizing things a little more sensibly, and adding some wiki links.  I cut a few non NPOV passages, and also a reference to the fgdsg
fdgshasdfbcdaexistence of E flat clarinet concertos -- the latter pending verification.  What concertos are there? -- Rsholmes 19:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Responding to my own question, so far my online searching hasn't turned up any concerti originally scored for E-flat clarinet.  However, I did learn about the baroque composer Johann Melchior Molter's six clarinet concerti -- probably the earliest extant clarinet concerti, written for 2- or 3-key clarinet in D. -- Rsholmes 03:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Is this in some way a particularly notable composition or E-flat clarinet solo?  Nice idea, putting a scan of the music in as a thumbnail, but I'd rather see this list confined to significant examples, and I'm not aware that this is one. -- Rsholmes 11:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've reverted this.  If you think there are good reasons to restore it, let me hear them. -- Rsholmes 17:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Do all of these pieces contain examples of significant E-flat or D clarinet solos?  Or are some of them, literally, "orchestral music using the E-flat clarinet"?  If the latter, why are we listing these?  There must be hundreds or thousands of pieces that use the E-flat clarinet, and I don't see a list of these as being useful.  I propose renaming this section "Notable solo literature for the E♭ (or D) clarinet" or something along those lines (suggestions welcome) and limiting it to  concerti and solo pieces originally written for the instrument, and orchestral pieces with notable solos (e.g. Til Eulenspiegel). I am not, however, familiar enough with all the pieces listed to know for sure which ones do and do not fall into this category, so some input would be welcome.  -- Rsholmes 15:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I did confirm that On the Town (which was just added) does in fact have an E♭ clarinet in its full orchestration, but I'm not qualified to judge how significant it is. If you do apply the 'notable solo literature' test to the list, you'll need to find reliable sources to support the calls. -- Donald Albury 15:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orchestral music utilizing the E♭ (or D) clarinet

message: Several recent edits added a reference written by someone with the same name as the Wikipedian who added it. I'm sure it's good-faith editing, probably a valid source for reference, and the person is apparently highly qualified and knowledgeable. So I don't know that WP:COI needs to be invoked. - Special-T (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of a ref by its author - exception to [[WP:COI]]?
Talk:Nightmare Creatures

message: How many times must the essential plot be repeated? 
Lots42 23:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeating 

message: That paragraph is a bit confusing. Does it mean that the bar can be turned on and off in all versions or just for the N64?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.94.53.43 (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adrenaline Bar in Port Differences

message: I think, by definition, this is not a survival horror game.
While the adrenaline mechanic is somewhat conceptually similar to inventory management, it is used to emphasize combat.
Emphasis on combat is definitely not a feature of survival horror, nor is platforming.
GiantBomb (https://www.giantbomb.com/nightmare-creatures/3030-584/) lists it as an Action-adventure game.
I think it should be listed the same here.
LordVanya (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: GiantBomb is a wiki, i.e. a WP:USERG source; editors of GiantBomb could just as easily argue that they should list the game as survival horror because that's how it is listed on Wikipedia. Your reasoning that platforming and emphasis on combat are incompatible with being survival horror is baffling, not only because it's not apparent how those elements interfere with the genre's nature, but because by that reasoning even series like Resident Evil, Dead Space, and Fatal Frame don't have a single installment that can be classified as survival horror. Are there any reliable sources that classify Nightmare Creatures as anything other than survival horror? Martin IIIa (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survival Horror? Under what definition? 

message: I wanna hear a detail explanation on how a third game, even though it was cancelled, counts as a "second sequel" to game that already had a 2nd sequel?--108.208.136.72 (talk) 04:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you clarify what the three sequels you are referring to were? I may have missed something, but looking at the article I saw mention of only two sequels, "Nightmare Creatures II" and "Nightmare Creatures III: Angel of Darkness". What was the other one?JBW (talk) 08:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know how I overlooked this thread before, but yes, to reiterate JBW's point, if you insist on editing the article to refer to a "third sequel", surely you must be able to name three sequels. Otherwise, how can you be sure that a third sequel even exists, much less that Nightmare Creatures III is it? Martin IIIa (talk) 02:06, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 now means 2? 

message: Is there any known list of the voice actors for this game.  Even IMDB doesn't have any info.
68.52.233.112 (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter; we can't list voice actors in this article per WP:VGSCOPE point 11. Martin IIIa (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice actors
Talk:List of Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog episodes

message: The airdates for almost all of these episodes are wrong, with the exception of "Super Robotnik."  The episodes did not originally air in production order. 68.14.117.56 (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Airdates 

message: Is there any chance of a Sonic Sez topic column being added to the table?
I'm in support of that  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.77.208 (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic Sez 

message: I thought there was an episode involving a bat who lived in a disappearing castle, in which Robotnik lured Sonic and Tails into the castle, and they struggled to escape before the sun set and they became trapped in the castle forever. Unfortunately I can't seem to find any information on this episode, and I don't remember what it was called. Does anybody know what I'm talking about? 70.213.20.116 (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The one with the disappearing castle 

message: Merlin states in the episode that to properly use the Emerald of Invicibility, one would have to be King. But Tails is able to use it, yet is not a king....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TyVulpine (talk • contribs) 23:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Hedgehog of the Hound Table 

message: Can you give me the edit where Lalalacoco put bad words in? They might be interesting Angry Video Game Nerd lines. 67.82.89.253 (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lalalacoco 

message: * Well, since Scratch said You're a Bad*ss in Super Robotnik, maybe this could be a possible reason why this would been bleeped.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:1010:6FE5:FACE:B00C:0:8000 (talk) 06:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adult Content Found, Again
Talk:List of All Grown Up! episodes

message: Whoever recently tuned up this page deserves a nice round of applause. Thanks a bunch! 66.31.209.239 (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: I dont think brothers grim aired yet, so i think we have to keep waiting.--Wikialexdx (talk) 02:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Brother Grimm aired for the first time in the UK in February 2006. It has been repeated many many times on Nick/Nicktoons since. In fact, All Grown Up! is still has a regular slot on Nickelodeon in the UK. (11am-11:30am / 11.30am-12noon). A user added the Brother Grimm airing info about a day after it had another repeat on Nick UK. I assume s/he watched it and thought s/he'd add the broadcast info to wikipedia. Not being American (nor ever been to America), i can't say for sure that Brothers Grimm, Bad Blood and Golden Boy have had an American broadcast. Hope that helps :-) TheProf - T / C 12:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last 3 episodes

message: These colours are burning my retinas, can someone please change them.IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: colours

message: Why does http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_DeVille link to the Rugrats!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.10.113.3 (talk) 02:22, 21 January 2010
:It doesn't. It links to this article and always has. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I like the idea of labeling the first appearances, as they help some long time fans of the original series know when some secondary characters are finally portrayed in the newer series. But is the whole 'last appearance' really necessary? Its only listed for the last four episodes and its clearly obvious that as a show begins to end some characters are not going to appear in the penultimate or last episode... Dustman15 (talk) 16:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First Appearance/Last Appearance" 

message: Notice that the guide was a bit sloppy, so I fix it up just to let y'all know. (mich (talk) 02:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I Fix something Up" 

message: Are clames that there will be new episodes comming in june true, or are these just baseless rumers?--J intela (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bringing Back 

message: The answer to the above question is they are unverified baseless rumors. No source online. Not even bad sources, have made that claim. This was the only place it was on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.84.20 (talk) 06:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Truth Of Consequences. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 18#Truth Of Consequences until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Kailash29792 (talk)  10:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Truth Of Consequences" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of Alvin and the Chipmunks episodes

message: I just contributed a page for A Chipmunk Reunion right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Chipmunk_Reunion
Feel free to make any corrections, if needed.
I don't think it was necessary. BTW, remember to sign your posts. WikiLubber (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added page about A Chipmunk Reunion

message: Why was my information about the missing scene from "Maids in Japan" edited out? It is true.
Apparently, it was considered unnecessary. But the important question is: WHY was the scene not shown on the DVD?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiLubber (talk • contribs) 16:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing scene info

message: "Chipmunkmania" wasn't a special, it was a normal episode.
I only have parts of 2 episodes on tape, so whoever did the episode guides, THANK YOU!
WAVY 10 21:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chipmunkmania

message: What do you make of this line from the Season 6 heading?
"The first opening sequence in this season has scenes from The Chipmunk Adventure. Later on it's something completely different".  WAVY 10 16:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird Phrasology 

message: Why did they stop running episodes of "Alvin and the Chipmunks" after episode 63? Did somebody or something scare too many people in the following episodes, or were they unprotected from a copyright claim? 71.90.23.222 (talk) 18:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wish I knew.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discontinued Episodes in Syndication

message: Does anyone know who originally  sang the key song "First date" in the episode 'Whatever Happened to David Seville"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.23.107 (talk) 08:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First Date

message: The plot of the "The Chipettes" episode WAS NOT used in Alvin and the chipmunks the squeakquel. In this movie, the girls are already established as the chipettes and the competition (the onlly thing that was reused actually) was for the students to choose wich group would represent their school in the open-schools talent show, the chipmunks or the chipettes. That wrong statement has been deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumerwritter (talk • contribs) 20:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The so-called Reused plot statement 