Talk:Mahikari

message: What do people think about adding information about each of the Mahikari groups under separate headings. I see a heading called Sukyo Mahikari already started. It would be quite informative to have expanded information on each of the groups Skeptomai 07:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sukyo Mahikari article

message: The page as it exists now describes only how Mahikari see themselves, as objective fact. The history and origin of the group is disputed by its critics. There are also some contoversial practices which are not mentioned, such as rejection of modern medicine, apocalyptic beliefs, non-conventional views of history, geography and linguistics, ideological connection to the AUM sect, and much more.
213.184.192.82 09:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies

message: I have spent some time with several related articles (in addition to sukyo_mahikari, see religions in japan, shinshukyo and yoshikazu okada). As you can see, there is still quite a bit of cite/reference work to do, facts to be separated from beliefs/pov, and facts to be consistent among the articles. Take a look and see what you think.Vontrotta 22:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare and contrast 

message: How easy is it to verify this source? Is it carried by libraries? The issue has been raised at Sukyo Mahikari where an editor using it said it was not available to non-members, which suggests it can't be used as a source. Thanks. --Doug Weller (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about verifiability of Goseigen book 

message: I removed something that was clearly not NPOV, but then I looked at the rest of the person's edits and wondered how true the rest of those edits were, or if anyone can confirm or deny it. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now since I definitely don't know if it's true or not, I can just tell when something probably shouldn't be in an article... in a certain format, anyway (as in totally capitalized). 71.33.67.58 (talk) 00:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, they shouldn't be in the article because they are not cited properly. They may well be true, but Wikipedia values verifiability over 'truth', and until they are verified they shouldn't be there. Note that I do not like any cults, but Wikipedia policies and guidelines should be maintained. Doug Weller (talk) 07:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Person's edits? 

message: Seems this article is not very neutral. Mahikari is a known CULT! http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=834&Itemid=11
And i know because i was a member. These people are very dangerous! 
N1gh7r4v3n (talk) 20:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Best to gather that information based on reliable sources and insert section on criticism. Per definition it is a new religion. Based on that definition there are a few orgs that are considered cults but the term cult is conflict burden on Wikipedia. --Catflap08 (talk) 20:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ~This article is not neutral! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mahikari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130719011245/http://sukyomahikari.in/ to http://sukyomahikari.in/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mahikari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.mahikari.org/
*Added  tag to http://www.mahikari.org/
*Added  tag to http://www.mahikari.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225054850/http://www.j-gate.net/~syg/index.html to http://www.j-gate.net/~syg/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified