lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mill Creek (Philadelphia)

message: Great photo from PWD can be found here:
http://www.phillyh2o.org/creek.htm
Anyone know if it is PD? --evrik (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Please stop placing the redundant category in the Mill Creek article. If you do decide to place it there again, please cite what policy you are following. I find that :Category:Rivers of Pennsylvania is overpopluated and unwieldy itself. Rivers are not addressed in Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories . I also checked out WikiProject Rivers, and didn't see it addressed. Unless you can find better documentation - let it go. --evrik (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant categories

message: "My name is Joseph DiJohn  and I owned a Victorian twin at 1019 S, 46th Street, Philadelphia Pa. I resided at the house from 1983 to 2007. And I fell witness to Mill Creek at it's highest forces.  With any considerable rain fall I would hear the rushing force of Mill Creek as my cellar  would fill with her fresh clean water sometimes up to 8 inches.  Along with the sound of her force I could smell the water before it actually appeared.  There was a bricked up stack that was in the middle of the cellar floor where most of the creeks water entered.  The water was crystal clear.   The person who gave the creek the access stack was right on the money. By giving the force a entrance it prevented the creek for washing out the soil which could have undermined the foundation stones in which the house was built on. As quickly as the water came up was just as quickly it disappeared then the rain ended.  For 24 years I was a part of our raw natural beauty of Philadelphia. That old 7 bedroom Victorian home stood strong in harmony and mingling with mother nature proved to be many of my favorite memories . In closing I am witness to the force of the creek.  Not just to testify on its existence but to express the pleasure I experienced finding out we coincided for 24 great years.  Sincerely Joseph DiJohn." PRRfan (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting story added to the article, and now moved to Talk
Talk:Guamá, Cuba

message: Guarma is not based on the town of Guamá in Red Dead Redemption 2 since it is mentioned as being "an island east of Cuba". It is most likely Isla de la Juventud. 215lax (talk) 21:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guarma/Guamá in Red Dead Redemption 2
Talk:Metka

message: I agree with the notice ("looks like an ad"). The creator of the article had taken a lot of material from the company site, and the article looked like an awkward advertisement. I tried to fix it as much as I could. As for notability and references, I beg to differ. Metka is a big, well-known company (plenty of info can be easily found on the net). Certainly such companies should be included, while the company site provides enough reference.
Skartsis 14:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability etc. 
Talk:Segundo Frente

message: es "SEGUNDO FRENTE" con la letra "G" "g" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.26.157.62 (talk • contribs) 
:Page has been now moved to "Segundo Frente". Note: in case of doubts the refs and the external link in the article show that the name is "Segundo", not "Secundo". --Dэя-Бøяg 02:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Circe (disambiguation)

message: I’m glad other Wikipedians left the link to the article on Surtsey.  I tried to find out about Surtsey in Wikipedia.  I didn’t know the spelling.  I had to search Google to find the correct spelling.  Many readers would not have gone back to Wikipedia after that.  Many readers would have missed that good featured Wikipedia article after that.  Barbara Shack 14:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mind Over Murder

message: I think I might give this article the once- or twice-over, with the intended goal of eventually getting it through GAR. You might also want to consult Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. There are quite a few of us copy editors looking to help articles reach GA and FA status... Bobnorwal (talk) 02:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: This are all the little things I've noticed that could get in the way of making this a Good Article:
* The link to film.com (reference #2, at the moment) is dead. TheWayBackMachine doesn't seem to have it archived, which is a pity since it seems to be an important part of this article. 
* The Chicago Sun-Times seems to have a review of this episode in their archive. This would help fill in the reception section a bit more, which the GA reviewer recommended. Too bad the article's behind a paywall... Is there any mechanism on Wikipedia to have someone else, who has a subscription, to come over and fill it in? Hm...
* The radio drama Suspense is mentioned a couple of times as an influence on this episode's title, but it seems like none of the references support this claim.
* The cultural references section mentions the Louise Woodward case. The reference, though, just says a "news item at the time". I'm afraid I am partly responsible for this original research. Though a "news item at the time" seems a bit vague, and I've yet to unearth a more specific reference.
* The fact that the song Lois sings is "You'll Never Know" could probably be moved to the cultural references section, couldn't it?
* Also, it isn't exactly essential to the article that the bar's name is "Ye Old(e) Pube" is it? :D
Bobnorwal (talk) 19:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:Cortado (software)

message: Cortado player never worked for me, I use several computers (not just my own). The quicktime option does not function either. 94.223.125.193 (talk) 22:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never worked for me 

message: I added some information on the notability of this piece of software. Maybe we can remove the template now?--Speck-Made (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove notability tag? 

message: Concerning the Cortado software the wikipedia article says, "Among others it is used on Wikimedia projects..."
My fully-updated Firefox browser on Windows XP plays ogg files fine on Wikipedia pages. But when I click on the downloaded file I get a popup window asking what to play it with. I can't get the Firefox browser to play it. I would like to use whatever Firefox is using to stream the ogg file. 
Isn't the Firefox browser using Cortado Java plug-ins to play ogg music files? There is an ogg music file I can stream fine when I click the play button on this page:
*Portishead
When I click it I find out that it lists the Cortado Java player as being the current selected player. It also offers QuickTime as an option. QuickTime could not play it.
I downloaded the ogg file. When I click the downloaded file, I can't get the Firefox browser to play it. I don't want to install other players yet.
Where do I browse to in Windows to select the Cortado Java player? I am talking about when I click on the downloaded ogg file and the popup window asks what I want to use to open the ogg file with. 
I also asked at Wikipedia talk:Media help (Ogg).
It would be good to include info in the article as to how Wikimedia and Wikipedia uses the Cortado software. I don't remember installing it separately. So I assume it is part of the normal Firefox software install, and not Firefox plugins. Or maybe it is part of the Firefox automatic Java updates. Did Wikimedia have anything to do with making that happen? --Timeshifter (talk) 12:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't install Cortado; you install Java to make Cortado work on your browser.  If you already downloaded the Ogg file (video or audio) then you can also play it on a real player like WMP.  For WMP all you need is to install the DirectShow Ogg codecs.  That's it.  Don't over complicate it.--Ivo talk / contribs (join Project Portugal) 01:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

text: If it wasn't clear, Cortado is a player loaded from Wikimedia servers and works as a Java application to load the Ogg files in Wikimedia.  You need to have Java installed, as well as enabled in Firefox (in case you or an extension disabled it).--Ivo talk / contribs (join Project Portugal) 01:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks. So I guess my Firefox browser downloads the small Cortado application each time I click on a streaming Ogg file link on a web page. I will have to try to find the DirectShow Ogg codecs for Windows Media Player as you suggested. In order to play Ogg files offline. --Timeshifter (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I get Firefox to play a downloaded Ogg file?
Talk:Llandovery

message: Surely we should delete the reference to the Llandovery Decor Centre?
Dublinblue 15:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
As per Google Maps
—Plane007 (talk) 18:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . The coordinates in the article appear to be correct. If you have a specific suggestion for a needed change, please post it below. Deor (talk) 03:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: A first class cricketer of Hampshire called Thomas Soar (born 1865) coached cricket at the college there (after retiring from playing) and is buried in the church yard, I believe. He was a good bowler, playing 101 First Class games taking 328 wickets at 23.82 runs apiece.  He played for Carmarthenshire while living there. RoyDPP (talk) 08:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, his cricket stats are here at CricInfo, but that shows that he took 323 f/c wickets not 328. Anyway, we have an article at Thomas Soar. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: He might be added to the notable staff section of Llandovery College if it could be detemined exactly what years he was a coach there. Deor (talk) 13:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports people of Llandovery
Talk:UFC 79

message: As indicated by myself (and several other editors) on the AfD page, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Those matchups you keep adding back, aside from Clementi/Guillard, are not "well documented." I've read the sources. They all say variations of "there's some speculation that such and such fight might happen"; "So-and-so said that he wants to fight X at UFC 79"; or "X fight might happen, if things come together and everyone signs contracts." That's a FAAAAAR cry from "well documented."
Until there's something concrete that a fight is actually going to happen, it does not belong on the Wiki page. It either needs to be officially announced by the UFC, or one of the participants needs to confirm that the match has been completely finalized. Yes, the card may still be subject to change. But, at least at that point, there's a solid factual basis to believe the fight will happen. Until then, if people want to see what's been rumored, they can go to MMA Weekly's Rumors section. Tuckdogg 12:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the references so none say "likely" or "expected". All say they are happening. The info on Lister vs Radev comes from a quote on Lister's official website. - Indecision 05:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Possible" matchups 

message: After the Fight Network story was released they were fighting on NYE, they released another saying it was unlikely (I couldn't find it in a quick search, but it's not important now)...  recently in an interview Nogueira said his next fight is February 3 ().  I removed the fight since it's obviously not happened at UFC 79 now.  Thesaddestday 15:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kongo vs. Nogueira

message: For those unaware, Matt Serra injured his back earlier this week and was forced to pull out from his scheduled UFC 79 fight with Matt Hughes. When this fight will happen now is unknown at this point, though the only thing that is certain is that Hughes vs. Serra will not happen at UFC 79.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuzukS (talk • contribs) 11:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt Hughes vs. Matt Serra is OFF!
Template talk:DC Comics animated films

message: It's not collapsing properly, it needs to be fixed. -- Harish - 15:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template autocollapse 

message: The first sub-box here is titled "Stand-alone films" but the first link in it is to the article on the Paramount-distributed series of 17 Superman theatrical cartoon shorts of the early 1940s. This is a contradiction in terms. The entry reads, "Superman (1941)" but perhaps the best solution is to expand the parenthetical aside to read, "17 shorts, 1941–1943" and trust readers to understand that by stand-alone we mean that they don't tie directly into any other productions. Comments, anyone? --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paramount's Superman shorts 

message: Regarding this edit, what's your source that it's not part of the same continuity? —scarecroe (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Writer Duane Capizzi confirmed it here.-5- (talk) 18:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Brainiac Attacks continuity

message: The template has separate sections for Lego films and Super Hero Girls films. Where does Lego DC Super Hero Girls: Brain Drain belong? It's currently in the Lego section, but I'm not sure that's the best fit. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:13, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Lego if it use the lego design. DoctorHver (talk) 03:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lego or Girls? 

message: There are a few incongruities among these wiki pages with regards to some earlier DC feature releases.  A notable example is this template's listing of Animated films based on DC Comics -> DC Animated
Universe -> The Batman/Superman Movie: World's Finest -- which is a DVD release of 3 television episodes.  Refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_based_on_DC_Comics#Episodes_as_films_2
Edit: Similarly, Justice League vs. the Fatal Five is listed on this template under DCUAOM -> Stand-alone feature films... but it also appears listed on the DCAU page under feature films.  So is it DCUAOM or DCAU?  Ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC_animated_universe#Feature-length_films
I'm not sure if these belong here, or where they should belong in this template.  I think it should be addressed though. - 45.131.210.17 (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Episodes released as Films / Which universe do these belong in?
Talk:Swastika Laundry

message: As I recall, the laundry merged with dry-cleaners called Bells at some point and, in the early 1960s, the vans carried symbols of both companies.  Anybody got definitive information on this?  JXM 23:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember and cannot find anything online on Bell's. Keep looking. ww2censor 02:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I distinctly remember seeing a Swastica Laundry shop window in 1976, probably somewhere south of the city center (I remember seeing it as I rode buses from Dun Laoghaire). Did they have such outlets or was it an independent laundry sprung up after the original company closed? According to this http://comeheretome.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/swastika-laundry-1912-1987/, the co. closed in 1987 which matches my memories.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spamhog (talk • contribs) 13:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Bells Dyers and Cleaners was taken over by Swastika Laundry, sorry I don't know the date. The dry cleaners at the front of the premises in Ballsbridge was called Bells 78.137.156.214 (talk) 16:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Bell's Swastika Laundry

message: Is this really notable at all? I say not. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 07:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have just carried out a general overhaul of this article. One of the changes I have made is to the claim that the vans bore a black swastika on a white background: I have reversed that to white-on-black, on the evidence of the two colour and three black-and-white photos included in the "Come here to me!" article (all of which which definitely show a white swastika, though the background could possibly be a dark red). It's possible that black-on-white was also used, but the only source provided was the photo in the "Electric/Battery Powered Vehicles" article, which, as the article explains, is of a repainted Dartry van, mocked up for a TV series: some better evidence is needed if this is to go back in. GrindtXX (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour of swastika 

message: The claim that its name and symbol caused "consternation" is entirely wrong. It long predated the Nazi use of the symbol, and everyone in Dublin knew it had nothing whatsoever to do with Nazism. The owner's attitude that he wasn't going to be bullied into changing his company's name by a "jumped up little Austrian corporal" was applauded. Many members of the Jewish community in 'Little Jerusalem' in Portobello in Dublin used the business. It certainly didn't cause 'consternation' nor widespread offence. The claim is unambiguously wrong. 2001:BB6:5974:F658:CC1B:5CBE:D85:A3E0 (talk) 01:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "Consternation", I don't think so. No evidence provided, so I've tempered the WP:LEDE and added a phrase from the main prose. ww2censor (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious: Claim its name, symbol caused "consternation" entirely wrong
Talk:Lasnamäe Airfield

message: Sure? Seems, it was in Paevälja, even abandoned airtraffic tower is saved. 90.191.190.76 (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be somewhere around here. Flying Saucer (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  found something here. 90.191.190.76 (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Keesha F. Sharp

message: In the second season opener I believe, Keisha said her family was moving to Compton. Since Shelia was Keisha's mother, that simply means she went to Compton with her.
Unless I'm wrong.
(Matthewmilam 16:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her exit from Everybody Hates Chris was explained
Talk:The Woods Are Dark

message: The article states that the 2008 Cemetery Dance edition includes 50 pages of material which was cut from the earlier Warner Books edition.  This is true, but the actual situation is more complicated than this: the Cemetery Dance edition also *omits* a few dozen pages of material which was included in the much earlier British (Headline) edition of the novel.  That is, both the Cemetery Dance and Headline editions include substantial passages not found in the other.  These two passages are completely different from each other: the two are in effect completely different sub-plots which were found in one edition but not the other, thus creating two different versions of the novel, neither an entire subset of the other.
The added material in the Cemetery Dance edition was also published several years ago in a limited-edition chapbook which was issued together with limited editions of "A Writer's Tale".
I have never seen the Warner Books edition, so I don't know if it includes this material added to the Headline edition.  If it does not, then presumably it would be substantially shorter than either the Cemetery Dance or Headline editions.
The extra material in both the Headline and Cemetery Dance editions is not continuous, but takes the form of several chapters interspersed between the other chapters common to both editions, and representing separate narrative strands that alternate several times.
What is uncertain is the origin of the material added to the Headline edition.  Because it is not included in the Cemetery Dance edition, presumably it was not in the novel as originally written.  Did Laymon write this material later to substitute for the material the Warner Books editors took out - or could it have even been written by the editors?
For a moment I was going to alter the article to reflect the differences I've just described (which can be easily seen by comparing the Cemetery Dance and Headline editions), but I decided not to when I realized I didn't know quite enough about the whole situation to do so properly - especially what material is included in the Warner Books edition or not.  (I own both the other editions, but not the Warner Books edition.)  Instead, I note my observations here, and maybe someone who knows the definitive story behind this could one day amend the article accordingly.  I may do so myself one day if I can find out exactly what the Warner Books version includes and doesn't include.
If anyone knows about this, I would be very interested to learn of it, and it would be a good addition to make to this article.
Thanks. M.J.E. (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences between versions of the novel.
Talk:Raids on Haskanita

message: I will expand it a lot in the following days so please give me time..--TheFEARgod (Ч) 16:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done --TheFEARgod (Ч) 10:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures

message: I'm actually the guy that does the CVE assignments for Red Hat and by extension a lot of Open Source projects so as things change I'll make en effort to keep this page in sync. If you have any questions please email me at kseifried@redhat.com  Seifried~enwiki (talk | contribs) 03:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance of page 

message: I think the article should be renamed to Common Vulnerability and Exposure (the singular) since people in general do write CVEs as the plural. 79.168.46.147 (talk) 23:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singular and plural 

message: The whole article does not go into any detail about what kind of vulnerabilities are CVE worthy. It is noteworthy, that not each and every software problem is CVE worthy. There are some generic guidelines about vulnerabilities and exposures https://cve.mitre.org/about/terminology.html, but all of this is not an exact science, and there is (ongoing) discussions on how to handle some specific cases https://cve.mitre.org/data/board/archives/2016-06/msg00007.html.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karol Babioch (talk • contribs) 21:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing paragraph about what is CVE worthy 

message: Greetings,
reading through the original paper that MITRE has on their CVE website (https://cve.mitre.org/docs/docs-2000/cerias.html) i think it should be at least noted somewhere in the article, that back then in 1999 CVE was acronym for Common Vulnerability Enumeration. Because i first thought, that Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures is a mistake, but it's right since it's listed under acronyms here at the end of the page: https://cve.mitre.org/cve/cna/rules.html Zeikonaut (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Acronym
Talk:River Camlin

message: "Cam linn" should be "crooked pool," not "crooked line."
"Líne" is a recent loanword from English, meaning "line," and as such is very unlikely to have anything to do with a Gaelic placename.  Further, it's pronounced something like "Lee-na" making anglicization as "lin" even more improbable.  
"Linn" meaning "pool" is a traditional element of Gaelic placenames, showing up even in the anglicized Dublin: "dubh linn" or "black pool" as the city has been known for centuries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.148.148.187 (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: crooked