lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:U.D.O.

message: I improved this article. if you ask me, now it looks A LOT better.(Deathmagnetic08 (talk) 15:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improved! 

message: Would somebody who's been paying more attention to the band than I have in the past 3 years consider expanding the history section? The last 2 paragraphs of it do sound lame. 80.250.79.38 (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band's recent history 
Talk:Constitution of Pakistan

message: How about adding a new section for amendments made in the constitution such as the 17th amendment and more recently the 18th amendment?--Certified Expert (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amendments? 

message: esmblys disovle 62.74.60.255 (talk) 18:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election  

message: when breaks asmblys 62.74.60.255 (talk) 18:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election
Talk:Jennifer Melfi

message: Template:Infobox_character previously had this text:
| name = Dr. Jennifer Melfi
| fullname = Dr. Jennifer Melfi
Is that correct? Is one's title a part of their full name? I changed it just in case it isn't correct: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jennifer_Melfi&type=revision&diff=843888921&oldid=843888482 --YellowCakeUranium (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Auditor General of Pakistan

message: AGP office has Pakistan Audit and Accounts Academy at Lahore to run courses for its Field Audit Offices. Rector is the Head of the Academies at Lahore, while its regional academies are situated at Islamabad, Karachi, Quetta and Peshawar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.30.245 (talk) 09:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan Audit & Accounts Academy
Talk:Annex to the Constitution of Pakistan

message: This article has copied it's text directly from here.  Despite what the administrator who previously saw this article thought, I believe this is a copyvio as it does not fall under the fair use laws of the United States.  Anyhow that is just my 10 cents.  I may very well mark this as a copyvio later anyhow, as the most recent incident was two years ago. Zell Faze (talk) 13:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio issues
Talk:Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan

message: The article says that the amendment was passed by the majlis-e-shoora. Shortly afterward, the article says that the amendment was passed in the absence of the "elected Parliament". But the elected Parliament of Pakistan is and was the majlis-e-shoora, so this appears to be a contradiction. Clarification is needed.Bill (talk) 22:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction?
Talk:Challenging behaviour

message: I've made a start on this article - I'll expand it as I get time, but please add information if you can! Natgoo 21:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed a link to a treatement center, for the second time, as the person who'd originally put it on the page edited it back in.  It seems they're adding the link to advertise their program.  If the person who added that link wants to add it back, please explain why that link is informative.  I'm unsure about the other links on the page.  I'd think that links on the page should provide more information on the topic to be worthy of inclusion.  There are many, many treatment programs around the world, and listing certain programs as external links is inappropriate, unless those websites provide significant information, or unless the particular program is justifiably mentioned in the article.--Brokenchairs (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the link for a third time.  It is obviously in contravention with WP:SPAM and doesn't provide any useful information.  Davetibbs (talk) 13:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I have edited all the US spelling (behavior) in the article to fit with the UK spelling of the article title (behaviour) - just to make it consistent.  If anyone has any objection or ideas, please discuss it here Davetibbs (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a British English ENGVAR template to the talk page, which will hopefully prevent unnecessary spelling changes in the future. Acopyeditor (talk) 08:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK/US Spelling 
Talk:Tic Tac Toe (band)

message: This article needs cleanup in order to comply with the general style of Wikipedia entries.  The article contains non-factual (or unsupported) claims and verbose language. 04:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Needed 

message: I've not very savvy when it comes to boxes, but I do see the cluttered mess at the bottom where singles and albums are listed.  If someone who knows more than I do about WP could direct me to the infobox templates for albums and singles I'll transfer the info. Dwayne M Stange 16:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes 

message: Odd that you have translated "Verpiss dich" as "Fuck Off". "Piss off" seems more eloquent. Also "Ich find' dich Scheisse" as "I think you're shit" is hardy humorous. Surely "I find you're shit" or "I find you shitty" is more in keeping with the songs emphasis.
--Candy (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations
Talk:Joyce Carey

message: I think it's odd that Joyce Carey, one of the finest British authors of the 20th century has no entry on wikipedia, but a British actress of the same name does. I hardly have time to create an entry that does justice to his literary stature, but someone really should.
:You're mistaken about the spelling of his name. See Joyce Cary. Akld guy (talk) 07:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Mozambique Channel

message: Why is anyone quoting a publication that is 59 years old (published in 1953) anyway, way before the existence of the independent country of Mozambique? I could also quote anyone who is obviously incorrect, but would that make it factual? Has anyone looked at a map lately? Backspace (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The IHO is the official authority on oceanic limits and hence worth quoting in this sort of article. Their 1953 publication may be 59 years old, but it is still the most recent ratified definition of the limits, and to be fair, the seas and oceans haven't moved much in the last 59 years. (A 2000 version of the Limits document was produced, but it wasn't ratified and has never been published - blame the Australians, but that's another story.) So, whilst not perfect, we are still quoting the official definition. But it's a funny one because it definitely looks wrong. It could just be an error (it certainly wouldn't be the only one in the definitions), but my guess is that by "South Africa" they actually meant "Southern Africa" - they could have been clearer in their wording, but this would make sense. Bazonka (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Hydrographic Organization quote from 1953 

message: :*The channel is approximately 460 km (286 mi) across at its narrowest point between Angoche, Mozambique, and Tambohorano, Madagascar.
That's what several websites claim, such as The Encyclopedia of Earth. However, the narrowest point is actually further north, between coordinates 15.0084° East, 40.7708° South (Mozambique) and 16.1979° East, 44.4414° South (Madagascar). The (ellipsoidal) distance between these points is 419.3 km. I'm going to change the article accordingly.
About tools: I trust Google Maps to find the coordinates of points on the earth, but use a proper geodetic calculator to calculate the distance between them. Herbee (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width of the Mozambique channel
Talk:The Whitest Boy Alive

message: Is it so important that the keyboard player plays a Crumar synthesizer that he is listed as the "Crumar player" instead of just the "keyboard player", and if so, why is it not specified which model Crumar he uses?
84.198.246.199 (talk) 19:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much/not enough detail 

message: Shoegaze and Dream Pop are not right for this music project. But you can hear Funk in it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.50.2.26 (talk) 11:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Get Ur Freak On

message: Two problems with the stated release date of March 6, 2001. The cited reference, Billboard April 14, page 36, actually says 'The album's first single is "Get Ur Freak On," which was sent to radio March 13.' not March 6. But what's puzzling is that the track had already made Billboard's Hot R&B/Hip-Hop chart in the February 17 issue. It made the chart on the basis of airplay. It didn't debut on the R&B/Hip-Hop SALES chart until the March 17 issue. I think for now I'll just change the date to match what the cite actually says. I don't have an actual date that would correspond to the February airplay. PatConolly (talk) 05:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: — Assignment last updated by Clariwyd (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HipHop Music Culture
Talk:I'm Really Hot

message: Why is the Pussy Wagon from Kill Bill in the video? --TMC1221 (talk) 21:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  kill bill
Talk:Reformed Presbyterian Church

message: There was a claim that the RP church of Cyprus should be removed, as it's under jurisdiction of the RPCNA.  My points are:
# Please cite a source that it's under RPCNA jurisdiction -- I had the impression it wasn't.  
# If you find the source for this, please add it to the geographical list for the RPCNA —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TimNelson (talk • contribs) 04:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a source to show that the RPCNA has fraternal relations with it: you don't have fraternal relations with your own body, so it is recognised as different.  Nyttend 13:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RP Church of Cyprus 

message: Please note Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Page naming conventions, it is not necessary to call the page "Reformed Presbyterian Church (disambiguation)" it should just be called "Reformed Presbyterian Church". DrKiernan 16:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation pages
Talk:Black Shadow (wrestler)

message: The wiki reference in the article probably should be replaced since Wiki sites aren't normally considered reliable publishers per WP:ATT.  The wrestling observer is probably a more reliable source, since it appears to be an actual newsletter as opposed to a blog. Just in case, though, I flagged the article for a citation check. Dugwiki 22:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference issue
Talk:Alutiiq language

message: So who are the 300 non-Alutiiq Alutiiq speakers? The article says "About 100 of the Alutiiq population of 3,000 speak the Alutiiq language" but also says (in the infobox) "Total speakers: approximately 400". --Haruo (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: inconsistency
Talk:Jackstaff

message: why upside down? TCO (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Sir James Graham, 2nd Baronet

message: This is the second page I've found that refers to William Beckett as a member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.   He's a twenty-two year old singer in an indie rock band (The Academy Is...), and lives in the USA.   This dude was dead before William was born.   Redspark09 22:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's undoubtedly true that William Beckett was a British MP - indeed, there were have been several. However, William Beckett on Wikipedia is the US musician. What is needed is some disambiguation. The name William Beckett is common enough in Anglo-Saxon societies for there to have been several notable people with it, and it's difficult to say one of them is clearly the most important. Sam Blacketer 22:44, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cyme (Aeolis)

message: The following sentence ends the introduction to the topic:
'As a result of their direct access to the sea, unlike most non-landlocked settlements of the ancient world, trade is believed to have prospered.'
The sense of these three convoluted clauses escapes understandings. Trade doesn't normally prosper at coastal settlements? Completely false, if that is indeed what is intended. RobotBoy66 (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused Syntax
Talk:Ripon (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I'm going to point this out again.   The link to the page about William Beckett is a link to the twenty-two year old singer of The Academy Is....   Redspark09 22:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pacification of Ghent

message: The slant of this stub puts my teeth on edge. It clearly has been written by someone not very familiar with the nuances of the history, though in broad brush strokes it may be corrrect. There are much better sources than the short encyclopaedia Brittannica article also. I propose a major rewrite of the article, with a proper background and aftermath section, and giving poor Aerschot his due.--Ereunetes (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid I already have Done the Deed :-)--Ereunetes (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Should "Zeeland" be spelled "Zealand"? Mwahcysl (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slant of the article
Talk:Union of Arras

message: Under the heading "Text" a link to the wrong treaty is given. The link refers to the peace treaty of 17 May 1579 that was concluded between Parma and several members of the Union of Arras, that had been formed on 6 January 1579. I have substituted a link to the French text of the treaty of 6 January that established the Union of Arras.--Ereunetes (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to wrong treaty 

message: After I had made the relatively minor correction of the link to the Act of 6 January 1579 that established the Union of Arras I discovered when reading that Act and the subsequent peace treaty of 17 May 1795 that the current text of the article confounds a number of important things. A number of the elements of the Union mentioned in the article were in fact only established in the peace treaty. The Act of 6 January was only a reaffirmation of the earlier Pacification of Ghent, the Union of Brussels, and the Perpetual Edict that according to the Act had been twisted and deformed by the Protestants in the provinces that did not contract to become part of the Union of Arras (viz. Flanders, Brabant, Holland, Zeeland, and other parts of the northern Habsburg Netherlands). Above all, the Act promised to vigorously defend the Catholic religion against the heresies and other depredations of these Protestants. This latter objective is also an important part of the peace treaty, as is the  affirmation of the above mentioned earlier treaties. But the peace treaty addressed a number of practical matters, like a general amnesty; the removal of foreign mercenary troops in the employ of both the Spanish Crown and the States of the provinces that were part of the Union, to be replaced with locally raised troops; the new composition of the Council of State; and the abolition of taxes that had been imposed after the end of the reign of emperor Charles V. These matters therefore indeed became aspects of the Union of Arras, but only after the conclusion and implementation of the peace treaty of 17 May, not the Act of 6 January . What neither act or treaty did, was renew the fealty to Don Juan of Austria as the article now states, because that gentleman was by this time already deceased. I intend to rewrite the article with these points in mind.--Ereunetes (talk) 00:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs extensive rewriting 

message: The quote is undoubtedly very interesting, and probably very ´´rousing´´, but shouldn´t it be in English, since it is an English article? Very inaccesible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.158.46.83 (talk) 13:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote
Talk:Ronit Roy

message: To the anonymous editor who seems to think it is okay to persistently add the nickname "Amitabh Bachchan of Television" to this article, that is contextless puffery that doesn't belong in the article. If and when there is sufficient context to describe him as that, then perhaps it can be restored somewhere in the article (probably not the lead, though). You see, context, (5Ws) is important, as this is a global encyclopedia, not just the Indian Wikipedia, so people in Brazil need to understand why Roy might be called that, which might also require explaining who Amitabh Bachchan is. Context. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Amitabh Bachchan of Television"
Talk:List of bacterial orders

message: As at September 2021: (1) The Annotree website is NOT based on the last GDTB release (202), but on the previous release (95). I have fixed this now. (2) The tree depicted at the beginning of this article is clearly NOT the tree depicted on the Annotree website. Either this is a case of original research (accompanied by deliberately wrong citation of sources) or the tree is based on some older version of the Annotree. This has to be fixed somehow. 2A02:AB04:3140:7400:D1F7:C667:7B31:2E46 (talk) 10:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:The Brunswickan

message: Frankly as a member of the UNB campus and as a person who pays for the Brunswickan whether I like it or not, I think that the paper requires improvements, some of them quite drastically. I do not think that the removal of the cricism section in this page was warranted, and I would like to see it back, perhaps with some modifications. And as soon as I get some new batteries for my mouse, I may do just that. Does anyone else have any opinions on the matter? GBMorris 22:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Opinion
Talk:Chrysaphius

message: Apologies if I'm being obtuse, but I've been researching this subject closely for the duration of the past month and I have not found anything in the Chronicle of Malalas about Chrysaphius being killed by the Blues or the crowd being angry specifically because of the tribute paid to Attila. That minor portion may need to be revised.
- John  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.15.113.5 (talk) 15:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Talk:One Six Right

message: This claim is false unless someone can prove this was released BEFORE HD DVD was launched. Also I think the other claims require references. --Ray andrew 23:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  first high definition film on HD DVD? 

message: It is unclear what this means: "During the first year of distribution, One Six Right's website became a leading example of successful independent film distribution by developing a viral marketing strategy that included multiple levels of consumer awareness allowing the film to develop significant presence within its niche audiences worldwide." 86.155.78.195 (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon needs fixing
Talk:Two Row Wampum Treaty

message: In the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Row_Wampum_Treaty reference 12 is suppposed to refer to an article in the Amsterdam Volkskrant (that is only accessible to subscribers). However, the actual link is erroneously http://www.colonialsense.com/Regional_History/Journals/Journal_of_Jasper_Danckaerts.php.
Engelsman (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong reference link 

message: I find the use of words like "supposedly" throughout this article to be prejudicial. 
Georgia Yankee (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prejudicial Language 

message: I would like to propose a new section on the 400th anniversary events, which were not only festivities but a whole campaign to renew the treaty and expand its recognition on the state, national and international levels.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorgenkor (talk • contribs) 19:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Bringing this over from our earlier conversation: "Looking more closely at that article, I would imagine that a section headed "400th Anniversary Celebration" would make sense. It should be only a paragraph or two -- I'm thinking something like the opening paragraph of the Atlantic article -- basically saying that it was celebrated with a 13-day trip along the river, stopping for celebrations like (name one or two), and culminating at a meeting at the UN. Then I think you may have content that could be added to the section on Interpretation." The Atlantic article is here. The other good source is from the UN here. It would be good to see if the statement in the "Interpretations" section speculating on the 2013 affect on the treaty can be updated -- did this happen? There is also information in this Washington Post article about conservation efforts and the treaty that could be added to the Interpretation section. Why don't you do a first pass, adding a short bit and I'll pop back to put in some more references and things. (Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages with four tilde's -- see below the edit box -- but (yes, this is confusing) not on the actual article page.) LaMona (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  400th Anniversary 

message: Reworked essentially everything in these sections according to the findings of the various contributors to the Special Issue of Journal of Early American History (volume 3.1, 2013). Eager to hear what you all have to say about the changes Eltheodigraeardgesece (talk) 21:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major overhaul of Treaty and Wampum Sections 

message: Bbbb 24.104.191.132 (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bbbb
Talk:Robert O. Cox

message: The content of this page used to be in Robert Cox. However, since there are several people with that name, I turned Robert Cox into a disambiguation page, and I copied and pasted its content here. Since this page existed already (it was a redirect to Robert Cox) I couldn't just move it here, so unfortunately all the editing history for this article on Robert O. Cox can only be found in the history page for Robert Cox. Sorry about this little inconvenience. SFinamore 23:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major editing: please read. 
Talk:Hurricane Arlene (1987)

message: Pretty good for a storm that doesn't have a lot of info about it. I've put it at start for now. Cite web formatting would be helpful, as well as some minor rewriting of the storm history to make it seem less like the TCR itself. I'll take a look at it later. --Coredesat 23:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Torrential rain in Bermuda?  The total was under 2"!  What are the monetary units used for the $8000 in damage?  There is at least one instance of improper capitalization.  Thegreatdr (talk) 01:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to ask you about rainfall. Do you have a source for the rainfall in Bermuda DR? (I keep forgetting that we have a meteorologist on the site) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's on the TC maximum rainfall page on the HPC website.  While there are no maps for Bermuda, the amounts are listed within the table.  Same is true for other islands such as Guam and American Samoa.  Thegreatdr (talk) 09:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lingering issues