lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samuel Thomson

message: Samuel Thomson is a major figure in alternative medicine.  You do not own this aritcle. -- John Gohde 04:32, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Who said I did. You don't need a giant box to link to alternative medicine. I added it to the see alsos. - Nunh-huh 04:42, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I will add back the full size infobox tomorrow, except that I will be sure to make it even bigger. I am glad that we are starting to see eye to eye. -- John Gohde 05:40, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Mediawiki message boxes were intended as a stopgap measure. We now have catagories, which render many of those boxes unnecessary. They should certainly not be used when they overwhelm content. - Nunh-huh 05:45, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: Please try to be civil. I certainly make no decisions concerning screen size, screen formatting, or categories, so you might inquire about them at the village pump. - Nunh-huh 07:11, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Giant box

message: While this article describes Samuel Thomson, and his system, I don't think it goes into depth enough about what his system actually is composed of other than that it was somehow connected with 'natural medicine'. There doesn't seem to be an article on wikipedia about it, and thus would be another potential avenue of research. I'd do it myself if I didn't have an impending thesis to write! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbmurray (talk • contribs) 03:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I added a reference and some external links, I agree that the article does not go into enough depth to his medicine.  In fact I think the anecdote about his wife was not accurate, but will have to double check the facts.  His sweating his daughter out of a major illness may be more apt.  He had learned about herbal medicine as a child.  The references are here, including works by Thompson edited by Lloyd for anyone to upgrade the article. Ksvaughan2 — Preceding undated comment added 21:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomson's system

message: I added more references but there really needs to be a section on his influence, pros and cons.  I also changed this from a cleanup to a bio-stub because it really is incomplete rather than unreferenced.  KSVaughan2 14:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence section
Talk:Surfside Beach, Texas

message: Hi.  I just wanted to state that Ron Paul actually lives in Lake Jackson.
I was wondering if horseback riding is allowed on surfside beach..
I dunno, but I've never seen 'em on the island
:: from the city website:
Horses are not allowed on the beach from May 15 through September 15.  Horses are allowed on the beach during weekends from April 1 through May 15 and September 15 through October 31.  Horses are allowed on the beach every day from November 1 through March 31.
Mari Adkins 18:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it located on Follets Island?
--Jerome Potts (talk) 03:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the island 

message: Surfside has smelly and discolored water. The Village has had hundreds of violations from TCEQ. Beware before you buy a house or rent a property from here. 209.44.179.148 (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village Of Surfside Water Quality
Talk:Mer Hayrenik

message: I copied the lyrics in Armenian script from a gif file. I hope it was copied correctly. If anyone finds any mistakes feel free to correct them and drop a line ghere when you believe everything's correct.
Nalbandian is the actual author of the anthem.
Is Nalbandian author of the current anthem's lyrics?
BTW is the transliteration following the Eastern Armenian pronounciation rules?--193.2.136.41 05:42, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In which dialect is this anthem sung in? Can both Eastern and Western Armenians understand the exact anthem? If so, how is this? Chaldean (talk) 01:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dialects
Talk:SuperCard

message: Why should this be a speedy delete instead of a redirect to hypercard? - Nunh-huh 07:21, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The various changes and additions made through February and March of 2022 by user Robert McBurney contain many irrelevant pontifications on his and others' software products, as well as the alleged "genius" of a pair of largely inconsequential developers not associated in any official manner with the publishers of SuperCard. His edits contain many falsehoods, inaccurate citations, personal opinions and other useless info not germane to the subject. Most, if not all, of his changes should be reverted. I am Christopher Watson, one of the original developers on the SuperCard team at Silicon Beach Software, Aldus Consumer Division and Allegiant Technologies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radec (talk • contribs) 04:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert McBurney
Talk:Redirect

message: Would this be a good place to discuss the use of redirects within Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spizzwink (talk • contribs) 02:52, 1 June 2004
:No, go to for example Wikipedia talk:Redirect. jni 11:07, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, so you can click the link to Wikipedia:redirect. This talkpage is for discussing the disambiguation page itself. Picaroon9288 03:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No subject
Talk:More Tribbles, More Troubles

message: The wording of the first sentence confused me.  Who is "he" in "he is beamed aboard?"  SWAdair | Talk  08:04, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: Are the bloopers really relevant? It's an old animation show. Misplaced characters in Toy Story 2 MIGHT be relevant but come on. Lots42 (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's worth mentioning because it is an oft-cited example of the sometimes dodgy animation in this series. Not referencing it would make the article seem incomplete to someone in the know.oknazevad (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bloopers
Talk:Pythian Games

message: This sentence is confusing: "They were held...two years after (and two years before) each Olympic Games"
So was this the pattern?
: Olympics - Nothing - Nothing - Pythian - Nothing - Nothing - Olympics - Nothing - Nothing - Pythian
--Quester 08:16, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well there was a four year cycle for the Olympics, so it was Olympics (year 1) - nothing (year 2) - Pythian (year 3) - nothing (year 4) - Olympics (cycle begins again). The Isthmian and Nemean games fit in there somewhere as well, so "nothing" isn't quite right for the off-years...also, it helps to remember that the Greeks began and ended their year differently than we do, so one of our years consists of parts of two different years for them (maybe that makes it more confusing, but I hope this answers the question). Adam Bishop 17:34, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: "the plain" being near modern-day Galaxidi.  Are there no articles for the Nemean Games and Isthmian Games?? (the Isthmian were held at Corinth, the Nenean at NemeaSkookum1 (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At a couple places in the article there is mention of winners receiving crowns of bay from, "the City of Tempe, in Thessaly." Does anyone have any sources from this? I'm not an expert in Ancient history, but I come from right around Tempe and I've never heard of there being an ancient city anywhere around the gorge.  Maybe what they mean to say is that the crowns came from the Gorge of Tempe (apparently called the "Vale" of Tempe in English which sounds super badass)?  The area does have ties to Apollo and does have TONS of wild bay... but it seems strange to me that they would travel so far to get bay when it grows like crazy all over Greece.  Skoulikomirmigotripa (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The City of Tempe?
Talk:Element

message: The burdensome appearance of elements (classical element) looks very redundant. --Quester 08:22, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: I'm removing links to this disambiguation page, and there is no onwards link to element's usage as " a fundamental part".  This is correct, as Wikipedia is not a Dictionary.  The link to Wiktionary is sufficient should someone search directly here.  From other pages it is a bit of overkill.  In summary - I have deleted links to here that should go to a "fundamental part" definition.
LeeG 01:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Element as "part"

message: Opened discussion on deleted entry for "Stoicheia / Stoicheion" as it is redirecting to Euclid's Elements only. The word is related to "Elements", there being a few dominate concepts associated. I wrote about it on the talk page for the word Talk:Stoicheia#Stoicheia_was_not_referenced_or_researched_properly_before_deletion[]. If this topic receives an independent page again, should it be referenced under the Elements disamb list? Roxanne-snowden (talk) 09:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2020 Inquiry, Advice

message: It's website is element.io and riot.im website was riot.im, which is the source of the confusion i think. source https://element.io/blog/welcome-to-element/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiveir (talk • contribs) 22:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Element (software) was never known as element.io 

message: What is an element 41.114.37.133 (talk) 16:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @41.114.37.133 41.116.191.34 (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical science 

message: "Technology" as it stands, is entirely devoted to software, apart from a lonely Honda motor car, and "Science" includes "heating element".
How about Science→Science and technology (to encompass heating and mobility aids) and Technology→Software engineering ? Doug butler (talk) 03:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headings
Talk:Lionel Penrose

message: Is 'S' his entire middle name, or just a middle initial? A period should be added if the latter were the case. Kent Wang 08:32, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't think there is any basis for describing Lionel Penrose as a "chess theorist". Unless a suitable source is found, this should come out of the intro. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a "chess theorist" 

message: In the career section the term "mental retardation" is used and I don't think I need to tell y'all why it's unfit for Wikipedia. I would change it, but I'm not quite sure what to change it to. It seems that by "mental retardation" not just intellectual disability is meant, but other neurological disabilities as well, due to the characterisation of BPD as "mild mental retardation". Would "mental disability" work to replace this? "Neurological disability"? I don't think the term "mental deficiency" should be used either, though. Amalthea Little (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mental retardation"
Talk:Chin-up bar

message: Is there any information besides the single reference that "chin-up bar" is the proper term for these things? It seems unusual considering the variety of actions that can be done on them. In the image, the child on the left isn't even bringing his chin over the bar, he's bringing his legs up and doing something of a horizantal row. Dictabeard (talk) 08:15, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's a "pull-up bar". Google is your friend. Kortoso (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Manapouri Power Station

message: The use of the CPI as a project cost inflator is inappropriate --- the GDP deflator method is better suited.  The 2008 figure should really be recalculated.  Robbiemorrison (talk) 13:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPI inappropriate as project cost inflator 

message: A recent edit changed all instances of the name Manapouri to Manapōuri (other than the article title).  There is currently insufficient widespread use of the spelling Manapōuri (with a macron) to meet the Wikipedia policy for place names as set out in WP:NCNZ, or the requirements of WP:COMMONNAME for article titles.  Also, the NZ Gazeteer of Place Names does not use the form with a macron.  Perhaps in future, usage with the macron may become predominant, but until then, the existing spelling should be retained.--Marshelec (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Kā Huru Manu (https://www.kahurumanu.co.nz/atlas) gives Manapōuri as the name of Shallow Bay at the north-eastern end of the lake and Moturau as the name of the lake itself. The NZ Gazetteer reference lists the name as "recorded" but not official (a large proportion of NZ place names have just been allowed to develop without being formally bestowed). I would class Kā Huru Manu as being more authoritative than the Gazetteer for the spelling of the name simply due to the former being more up to date (apart from anything else, it was difficult to type letters with macrons until recently). Daveosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Manapouri
Talk:Scholz conjecture

message: It would be nice if we could get this all into one language or all into another.
The Addition chain article states, that the conjecture has been verified for n<=64, this one says n<=46, which one is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.69.167.73 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Unless there is a lot more to say here, I propose to merge this into Addition chain.  Deltahedron (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I stumbled recently on a paper claiming a proof of the conjecture https://ia.cr/2023/051  What is the general opinion on this, because I have not found any flaw although the ideas are hard to parse?
(Sadinova (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Prof. Agama, I think this sort of unseemly self-promotion is below you.  Please also review David Eppstein's comment here.  --JBL (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  ...and see also WP:DISCLOSE. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed proof
Talk:Fluorescent Multilayer Disc

message: can you say vaporware? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.242.166.13 (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  can you say vaporware? 

message: * Potentially Malicious SPAM Link Removed:
* hxxp://www.ddatainc.com/page02.html#know
* https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/223cfe45629cbd54b62c04dedceece434b6a13f08cfdacf8664da1ac0fe3d637/analysis/
* Screenshot: http://urlquery.net/screenshot.php?id=3398531
* http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/ddatainc.com
--Gary Dee 10:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Removal 

message: The page doesn't rely in any resources and has only links with 3D optical data storage, in my opinion is better merge the two pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TizStriz (talk • contribs) 22:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion
Category talk:Mathematics

message: Should :Category:Mathematics be a parent category of :Category:Mathematical sciences?
(:Category:Mathematics currently has a subcategory :Category:Mathematical science occupations‎). Brad7777 (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that :Category:Mathematical sciences is now found at :Category:Applied mathematics (the former is a soft-redirect to the latter), which is a subcat of :Category:Fields of mathematics. - dcljr (talk) 12:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematical sciences 

message: I am creating this topic to debate about a change canceled by  : I had removed the abstraction category but  does not agree. It therefore seems necessary to me to continue the discussion initiated by Dcljr during its modification in order to reach a compromise. Of course everyone can participate. Dcljr, you think "categories are not intended to be a perfect summation of the nature of a topic" but I disagree. On the contrary, I think that we cannot put categories that do not have inseparable links with the subject. I understand that mathematics requires abstraction but to say that mathematics is a subcategory of abstraction I do not agree.
Plus it can create fancy category trees. Consider that with mathematics in the sub-category of abstraction, that gives mathematics under the tree of ontology and politics ...
A compromise may be to remove certain categories from the abstraction category. We could also put abstraction in a sub-category of mathematics, since it is true that abstraction is a notion used in mathematics.
I look forward to your opinions on my proposals! Zipodu (talk) 09:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've undone my undoing of your edit. People can discuss this, if they'd like, but I've decided I have no objection to your change, after all. As for putting cat:Abstraction under cat:Mathematics, I don't think that would work. By your own logic, that would bring in an awful lot of unrelated stuff under the umbrella of mathematics. - dcljr (talk) 12:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: you understood me ! :) Zipodu (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  debate on the categories of mathematics and abstraction
Category talk:Theorems

message: Should we put theorems of physics and economics in here as well, or just "mathematical" theorems?
I always thought the word "theorem" specifically referred to a mathematical result proved rigorously without reference to empirical data, so in that sense, physics and economics don't have "theorems", they have scientific conclusions or results or facts. Revolver 01:36, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: scope

message: So, where will this one go? Under Physics theorems? --Ancheta Wis 23:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thevenin's theorem
Talk:Administrative districts of Serbia

message: I've done some reordering of the districts on this page and in the template (alphabetical order is much more natural for a random reader, not familiar with the geography of Serbia.
I've also "touched up" the articles for the districts in Vojvodina. If they're good this way, I could use some help with standardizing the rest. Zocky 00:27, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: come on standardize it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avala (talk • contribs) 19:51, 3 July 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make better and standardize 

message: This articel must be renamed to District of Serbia during Milosevic time. and must be putit in Category History of Serbia--Hipi Zhdripi 04:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: This article, Regions of Serbia and Subdivisions of Serbia share 90% of information. I fail to see why it needs to be repeated, and, apart from the list of "regions", districts and municipalities and maps (most shared), what else could possibly be written about the division in general? I hate forks for no apparent reason. Duja 11:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergeto 

message: The two following sentences are not clear (at least I couldn't understand their meaning):
* Under the law, the municipalities, cities and settlements make the bases of the territorial organization.
* By its Enactment of 29 January 1992, the Government of the Republic of Serbia defined the state administration affairs that shall be run by the competent Ministries out of their seats, within the districts as regional centers of state authority.
Also the "Serbia organization" title could be changed to "Territorial organization of Serbia".
Being not familiar with the topic, I won't introduce any change myself. -- Best regards, Evv 08:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot. It's copied from http://www.arhiva.serbia.sr.gov.yu/cms/view.php?id=1010. It's legalese combined with poor translation. I'll try to clarify it somewhat. Duja► 16:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the "Serbia organization" section 

message: Some idiot changed the map of Serbian districts showing Kosovo as a autonomous republic!!! TheMiner (talk) 01:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of serbian districts 

message: Clearly there is a question about what to say about Kosovo's districts.
The POV of the Government of Kosovo is that Kosovo is not part of Serbia.
The POV of the Government of Serbiais that Kosovo is part of Serbia, albeit a part outside the control of the Government of Serbia.
I would think there are two possible neutral POV ways of dealing with this situation 
*Kosovo district should not be inclueded here, but instead including a link to Districts of Kosovo. 
*Kosovo districts should be included in this article because of Serbia claim to Kosovo.
I've adopted the second choice, but other editors should feel free to adopt the first choice and delete the Kosovo districts from this article.
2007apm (talk) 19:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kosovo
Talk:Coven

message: There should be a subsection titled, Offices and Titles. With at least Witch King/Queen, High Priest/ess, Maiden, Fetch, Scribe/Secretary, Bard, Archivist, Man at Arms, Purswarden/treasurer, etc. 192.30.184.240 (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section: Coven Offices and Titles 

message: — Assignment last updated by MoonFlower.l (talk) 06:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology
Talk:North Bačka District

message: Serbian government uses 3 forms of the name: Severno - Bački, Severno-Bački and Severnobački. Only the form Severnobački is in line with prescriptive ortography and general usage (cf. Južnoslovenski/Južnoslavenski). I suggest we use Severnobački. Zocky 23:49, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The spelling of the name
Talk:Fertilizer

message: I created, and linked to in the hatnotes, the disambiguation page "Plant food". Okay? Solomonfromfinland (talk) 02:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Said disambiguation currently links to five real articles, including this one. That's enuf to justify having such a disambiguation page, i suppose?--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 02:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Srem District

message: I've anglified the title of the article according to Vukovarsko-srijemska županija (here is titled as Vukovar-Syrmia County). Kamarad Walter (talk) 08:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syrmia 

message: Please see Talk:Syrmia#use of the term Syrmia in modern-day administrative subdivision names. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of the term Syrmia in modern-day administrative subdivision names
Wikipedia talk:How to archive Current Events/Archive 1

message: I was recently blasted for removing sources from [[April 2005] in an attempt to reduce the page size. Here's what happened on my talk page:
=== What the heck are you doing? ===
What the heck are you doing to April 2005 Trevor? Month pages always have links to stop people adding in phoney unsourced stories. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 02:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You certainly shouldn't start doing something like that without putting something up on the talk page first to see if anyone has any objections. Average Earthman 12:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What the heck am I doing removing sources?

message: What the heck are you doing to April 2005 Trevor? Month pages always have links to stop people adding in phoney unsourced stories. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 02:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You certainly shouldn't start doing something like that without putting something up on the talk page first to see if anyone has any objections. Average Earthman 12:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck are you doing?
Talk:Skeleton Army

message: I’ve pasted the quote from the 'Bethnal Green Eastern Post' (November 1882)in as it stands.  I assume something printed in 1882 is out of copyright.[User:Barbara Shack]
:That's correct.  And the article is improving--good work! Meelar 16:06, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: What sources are there for this information? Absolutely nothing is cited.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.164.48 (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: "Loafers" in this context probably shouldn't link to slip-on shoe. If it once led to a more appropriate article, which has since been deleted, that's a shame. 81.131.61.27 (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loafers 