Talk:Heather Mallick

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 22:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article is not about Barbara Kay. It is about Heather Mallick. In addition, Barbara Kay's comments about Quebec made several years ago are not relevant to this article and have nothing to do with the "context" in which she criticized Mallick. Finally, the use of words such as "ironically" are not NPOV.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 00:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Barbara Kay

message: This article previously contained controversial and unsubstantiated accusations about Mallick by Jonathan Kay and Barbara Kay. Some editors (me, specifically), tried to provide some historical context to the disputes between opinion columnists. Other editors deemed this context as not NPOV. But, as the articles presented as fact by Kay and Kay were also not NPOV, then all references to the articles by Kay and Kay were removed. As Hyperionsteel noted, this article is not about Barbara Kay. (Brxtux (talk) 03:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Barbara Kay

message: This comment is misleading.  Please source that anyone other than Fox, which specifically does not consider itself part of the "mainstream media" picked up on this story.  --The Four Deuces (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   "there was also a negative reaction in the US news media" 

message: Almost half the article is made up of this "controversy". Not only is that undue weight but it violates BLP. Round the Horne (talk) 00:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight 

message: In his edit comments, hyperionsteel wrote "I disagree, and your summarized version whitewashes her specific comments". That's not true. I didn't actually remove one word from the excerpt of her actual comments, what I summarized was the response. The quote about HRCs and press councils being pro-liberal has nothing to do with Mallick and a lot of the other stuff was repetitive (eg two almost identical quotes from Van Susteran) and the CBC response can be summarized by referring to the outcome. The process leading to the outcome is not needed. Keep in mind this is a minor incident in her career and does not merit the amount of space or blow by blow detail the article had previously. Keep in mind BLP and Undue Weight. If you want I can take this to the BLP message board and the outcome will probably be having even less about this incident then is on the page now. Round the Horne (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (August 2011) I've trimmed down the coverage of Mallicks attack on Palin and the ensuing events. I took out details that did not seem that important at first sight; I may well have made mistakes. Further edits welcome. CWC 01:41, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 incident 

message: I seem to recall seeing a statement that the CBC no longer publishes Ms Mallick, but our lede says she writes "an occasional column for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's website". Her website, which "went on vacation some time ago", shows her last CBC column as being published 2010-07-19. The website also says she "can be reached at the Toronto Star where she works", suggesting she is an employee instead of a freelancer. Do we need to update the lede? Cheers, CWC 01:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still writing for CBC? 

message: Substituted at 17:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Heather Mallick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071216164101/https://www.cna-acj.ca/client/cna/cna.nsf/web/NNAWinners1996 to http://www.cna-acj.ca/client/cna/cna.nsf/web/NNAWinners1996/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927143510/http://www.womenspost.ca/Oh_to_be_a_fool.asp to http://www.womenspost.ca/Oh_to_be_a_fool.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101219220422/http://j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=2832 to http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=2832
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Moved this text from main article to talk page: "Heather Mallick edited the intro on May 14, 2018 to update her resume. She knows this is not done, neither read nor altered anything else and has no Wikipedia expertise whatsoever."Oceanflynn (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: From main article

message: Heather
That’s the most uninformed article I’ve ever read …  your an idiot and are causing great harm to society., stupid stupid.. 2605:8D80:605:FE82:6950:54AE:BF9E:CF90 (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest article about unvaccinated