lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leutfridus

message: Regarding the March 2015 Merge Proposal:
Oppose. Two different people and no stong, independently recognised; no case made for merging. Klbrain (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Smooth-toothed pocket gopher

message: These sugenus assignments may not be correct. This reference http://www.science.smith.edu/msi/pdf/i0076-3519-273-01-0001.pdf places the camas pocket gopher in a different subgenus than currently listed.—Gaff ταλκ 03:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxon assignments
Talk:Nesso

message: I have translated the text of the Comune di Nesso website, which would probably be a useful addition to this stub.  However, the instructions on how to edit the page have put me off - I don't understand much of it and cannot believe it needs to be so complicated.
If anyone more expert is willing to assist, please let me know.
 – — … ° ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · §  Jonesrgv 19:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging

message: Added the UK Rating.. seemed a bit odd just having the USA rating of a British film (!!)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.108.238 (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added the UK rating

message: Could someone who knows the film well maybe look into sorting out the grammar and general writing style of this article? It reads like it's been written by a 14 year old fan.77.97.83.150 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly written

message: I am still thinking about the possible meaning behind the name Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging. What does 'Thongs' actually imply? Maybe someone should add informations on that into the article.  Dreamback1116 (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is in the book articles, feel free to work it in to the lead or production. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Why can't I find that? The book article is a stub. Dreamback1116 (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the meaning of the title because I, too, came here looking for it, and had to go look elsewhere.  I found it on Amazon and put it in the article and included the reference.  Please don't take this out unless you put something better in its place.  N0w8st8s (talk) 11:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

text:  I edited article extensively today, referring to thongs and snogging in detail ( and wiki-linked, of course ), in addition to correcting plot details and chronology -- i watched the film three times earlier today, so if i got something wrong please tell my doctor !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.243.98.238 (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The movie's name

message: The link to Sean Bourke doesn't go to the actor, but to somebody who died in 1982.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.11.221.81 (talk) 08:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sean Bourke

message: when are they going to make a new angus thongs ???????????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.216.151 (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel? 

message: Because there are some mild suggestive sexual references and some language, this film was rated PG-13. Even though it got that rating, it was still produced by Nickelodeon Movies. Does Nickelodeon Movies still make 'Angus, Thongs a family feature comedy film? (WikiFanCreator2010 (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging still a family film? 

message: Good honk, I think the summary of "War and Peace" is probably shorter. Could someone -- poor unfortunate soul -- who has sat through this movie please give us a tighter summary? two or three paragraphs would likely suffice. Lawikitejana (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "summary MAY be too long and detailed"?!
Talk:Diatype

message: Although this article does quite well to make clear the theoretical distinction between dialect and diatype, I don't think the example given of AAVE fits very well. AAVE could be a diatype just as well as a dialect; some speakers of AAVE (like myself) do not use it at all in daily life. Thoughts?
Dawson 19:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Feel free to replace it with a better example. :) ntennis 11:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The more commonly used term for a variety of language associated with a particular context of use is register. I can find only five articles that use the term diatype (in the relevant sense - searching is complicated by the existence of the term DIA-type apparatus in physics). Since it is only about 200 words, Diatype could easily be made a section of the page Register (sociolinguistics). Cnilep (talk) 16:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Register (sociolinguistics)
Talk:David X. Li

message: I'm going to guess Mr. Li put this page up himself.  Pioneered the use of Gaussian copulae?  Oh really?  I'm sure the statisticians who discovered these long ago would be surprised -- as would the statisticians at places like Renaissance and Citadel.  This page should be deleted.--128.135.149.78 19:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mr. Li shouldn't be blamed, he set up a simplified model based on Gaussian copula for the CDO-pricing, in order to create a new path for the pricing approach in the academic CDO research. The bankers are wrong to have used such a simplified model into the real CDO world, without considering that the real world is much more complicated than a Gaussian model. Academically speaking, the multivariate modeling used up to now does not properly describe financial and economic time series. The reason is that these models are mainly based on the Gaussian or on elliptical distributions.  ——Nutcracker胡桃夹子^.^tell me... 19:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, even this casual explanation is way over my head, and probably over the head of the bankers - I think the actuaries needed to do a better job at communicating complex and difficult stuff at an understandable level. I think Li did personally benefit and it seems unlikely he would have undermined his own career when everything was going well, in particular when he could pass the buck and say it wasn't his fault - it was sort of a sin of omission, he didn't raise the warning flag, at least not very loudly. Although this all easy to say in hindsight. Green Cardamom (talk) 12:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The real world is never Gaussian 
Talk:Strictosidine synthase

message: Shouldn't the reaction go the other way if it is a synthase?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.84.176 (talk) 10:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably... As with most enzymes there is probably some interchangeability between substrates and products. I am not aware of anyone treating this particular enzyme as a lyase, in the literature it is considered a synthase and several studies have investigated it's action on tryptamine derivatives as precursors... Someone familiar with wikipedia-policies ought to look into the praxis for enzymology in this encyclopedia. 81.224.47.12 (talk) 18:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Knatts Valley

message: The article gave an entirely wrong idea of the exact position of Knatts Valley. It is, in fact, what is known by estate agents as a "rural development" - as is East Hill, to the west of Knatts Valley - where houses are being built within an otherwise rural, wooded, area: houses which then sell for considerable sums. This may be too POV, but it is true nevertheless. Another example of this phenomenon is at Meopham - or more correctly, Culverstone, where a similar situation obtains. In any case the original article led one to west Kingsdown - in other words, near Deal (careless). Peter Shearan 19:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sinfjötli

message: In addition to citations, this needs coverage of the werewolf element, which is not a mere accusation during flyting. Also where are the bits in quotation marks taken from? And here and in Sigmund I believe a bit of story concerning the poison is missing, namely that Sigmund is impervious outside and in, Sinfjötli only externally. Yngvadottir (talk) 06:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What's missing
Talk:Oviduct

message: "In mammals, the portion of the oviduct above the uterus is referred to as the fallopian tube."
Obviously the fallopian tube is a part of the oviduct in mammals. Neither article should be merged into the other. 
This would be like merging the "caboose" article into the "train" article. The previous proposal was even more absurd, it would be like merging "train" into "caboose".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.132.92 (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging fallopian tube into oviduct 

message: Oviducts occur in pretty much any advance animal. Arthropods, echinoderms, mollusks, probably any bilaterian that produces eggs! This article needs better perspective. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oviducts are not unique to vertebrates.
Talk:Synthetic scale

message: "Synthetic scale" was previously a redirect to "Musical scale".  While this latter article does mention synthetic scales briefly (without naming them as synthetic scales), this article is now dedicated to them and gives a little more detail on them.  It retains a link to "Musical scale", though. M.J.E. 19:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed redirect for this heading to new article. 

message: I added one reference and changed the Unreferenced tag to a ref improve tag. What information needs to be verified and cited? Hyacinth (talk) 23:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added another source and an example and removed some content and the tag. Hyacinth (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref improve

message: I like this page very much but thought that I might draw attention to what may be an inconsistency between the following passages..
“In music, a synthetic scale is a scale which has been derived from a traditional diatonic major scale through the alteration of one degree by a semitone in either direction[1]...”
“Scriabin's Mystic chord, when considered as the "Prometheus scale", is an example of a synthetic chord in that it is whole tone scale with one degree altered”
My problem with this being that the Prometheus scale cannot be made by the alteration of one degree of a semitone in either direction from a diatonic major scale.
To make this example into a G Major (which I believe is the closest such major diatonic in this key) would require not only the Addition of one note (G!) but the alteration of another, the sharpening of the B.
Am I right here?
Andrew F. (talk) 01:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The next sentence reads: "Composer Ferruccio Busoni originally explored these scales in his A New Esthetic of Music[2] and their number and variety were later clarified by J. Murray Barbour who also proposed the application of the procedure to scales of more or less than seven degrees, including pentatonic scales." Hyacinth (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prometheus Scale - is it really synthetic in the sense mentioned?
Talk:Fenestrane

message: I couldn't help myself, lol sorry. But I'm sure it's possible it could be a theoretical thing. 2607:FEA8:99C0:61C0:9C14:5CDE:AB24:B0 (talk) 21:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Defenestration in chemistry refers to removing a C–C bond from the central carbon of a fenestrane. This means the fenestrane ceases being a fenestrane, this is why it is defenestration. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defenestration reactions
Talk:Oshin

message: Intentionally wiped talk page, as everything here is out-of-date or doesn't belong here. Groink (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intentionally wiped talk page 

message: Whoever thought the Sinhala dub of Oshin was aired in 1989, well you're wrong! It was not 1989, it was aired on the 30th of May 2012. It was the first Japanese teledrama to be dubbed in Sinhala before the arrival of the Korean saeguk teledramas from Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation signed a contract with the Sri Lankan national TV network.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muso Max Von Vaduz (talk • contribs) 15:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The correct year and date for the Sinhala dub of Oshin
Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life/to do

message: I cleaned out lots of mistakes and some redundant sentences. User:Statiq
----
I created this list to guide in the process, every step has to be verified by a user :-) --TarikAkin (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammer mistakes and Redundancy
Talk:Cranks (restaurant)

message: It has been suggested that this topic does not meet the notability criteria.  I argue that it meets the following criteria: 
"A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources."  The article cites a newspaper obituary of its co-founder Kay Canter which says that Cranks has been seen as a major factor in the spread of vegetarianism in recent decades.  It also cites a Guardian article about the closure of the restaurant.  Marshall46 19:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Demostylia

message: I wrote this article as 'Demostylia', consistently misspelling the name of the order.  Upon discovery, I found the pre-existing article and incorporated my text to its body, as the data therein was complimentary.  Can we redirect this misspelled page to the correct page, as others may repeat my mistake?
:Since its a misspelling I don't think any more discussion is needed.  I'll make it a redirect to Desmostylia, and update the desmostylian age range to late Oligocene and late Miocene.--Helioseus 22:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Eric DeLony

message: Material from a introduction for a lecture is a good resource: How do I go about making it apart of the page with proper citations.
*
Thanks for the cleanup Todd
--Saguinter 20:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello. Concerning your contribution, :Eric Delony, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author.  As a copyright violation, :Eric Delony appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. :Eric Delony has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
:*If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Eric Delony and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
:*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Eric Delony with a link to where we can find that note. 
:*If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Eric Delony. 
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.  Saguinter 19:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems
Category talk:Jack the Ripper victims

message: I realise there are huge debates about who was/wasn't a victim of Jack the Ripper, but most sources and the relevant article on Wikipedia broadly accept the notion of the canonical five. While I know many source do consider Martha Tabram a possible victim, others reject this and she is not a member of this group. Equally Emma Elizabeth Smith is very seldom considered to be a Ripper victim, so her inclusion here is very dubious. That said I wonder if the name of the category was changed to Suggested Jack the Ripper Victims it might be a solution? Dunarc (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the canonical five are a matter of dispute (eg Thomas Arnold claimed there were only 4 victims) and that is one reason why I think there is a problem and I thought 'suggested' for all of these names might be a way round this. I don't think a split for accepted/suggested would work. Template:Jack the Ripper has a section for 'Canonical Victims' and there is of course a body of work which uses this term for Nichols, Chapman, Stride, Eddowes and Kelly, but I think this would be too narrow for a category. Another possibility might be 'Victims of the Whitechapel murders' as this term covers all 11 murders in police files (see Whitechapel murders), even though some of them were highly unlikely to be the work of the same killer. Dunarc (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who should be included?
Talk:Alberic of Utrecht

message: I've assessed this article as "start," rather than stub, since it seems to be that little else is to be known about Alberic (or at least, little is to be readily found out). Alekjds talk 19:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Class assessment
Talk:In the Company of Cheerful Ladies

message: I am aware that a page on this subject was deleted in 2006, but the series of which this novel forms a part is very popular (a film is now in production), and other novels in the series now have their own pages, so I felt it would be acceptable to create this page at this time.--Karenjc 20:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However the article contains none of this extra information regarding notability and make no references or in line citations. Please add what you can! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm still slow at getting them into the correct format, but am indeed writing references and citations for this and the other couple of novels in this series whose articles I have been working on recently :) --Karenjc 22:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreated page
Talk:Hypo Real Estate

message: FMS Wertmanagement is missing. 188.100.48.98 (talk) 09:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:de:FMS Wertmanagement]] 

message: There's a hatnote at MLL (gene), which points here. How does "HRX" apply to this article? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HRX? 
Talk:Battle of Staten Island

message: I just want to point at that the map used in this article looks absolutely nothing like Staten Island. It's impossible to actually see what actually happened because the map is so inaccurate. Are there no better maps that exist? And even if not, I propose this map be removed either way, because it is not accurate nor helpful. Thank you. Bobharris1989 (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a new map 

message: Normally the result of the battle in the info-box just shows the result, not wether this was important or not. I think the page would like to move the “strategically unimportant” to the aftermath section in the actual article to make it conform to the norm. To me placing it in the info-box were it is normally not mentioned instead of the aftermath section were it fits perfectly seems a bit biased, downplaying the British success by naming its unimportance as a part of the result of the battle which was a British victory, even though it isn’t really all that harmful to the article overall. Dorromikhal (talk) 22:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategic importance
Talk:Apalachee massacre

message: This tone of this article is biased to represent the history here in way that is quite different than the way those living at the time would have perceived it.
For one thing, so-called "missions" in Florida, were little more than slave barracoons. The local indians feared the Spanish far more than the English. The Spanish were involved in a systematic program of raping and enslaving the Florida indians on a huge scale that made the English settlements look like camp sites. Representing the English attacks on the missions as some kind of brutality against a "peaceful" population is really absurd. The Spanish conquistadores that ran these missions were vicious, heavily armed, professional soldiers who were maintaining harems of indian girls and wantonly destroying anything that stood in the way of making a few pesos. They were regularly exporting the slaves they were catching and breeding at the missions to a life of horror in Cuban and South American mines and cane plantations where the indians were worked to death. The Rousseauesque portrayal of the situation in this article is unrecognizable from the reality of those times. John Chamberlain (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have sources that substantiate this, or are you just expressing an opinion? I'm all for correcting bias, but we can only go by what sources say. Magic♪piano 01:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanticism of the Florida missions 

message: I was just reading the introduction and it says "against a largely pacific population of Apalachee Indians in northern Spanish Florida". Spanish Florida borders the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico so was wondering what is meant by this sentence. I presume the writer meant passive population but don't want to just change it as I'm just guessing.Dja1979 (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Think wikt:pacific, not Pacific.  Magic♪piano 18:56, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  pacific population?
Talk:Jan Fuglset

message: Cannot move article, pretty sure real name is Jan Fuglset though (w/o "e"). Panichappy 20:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tynged

message: Can someone source this? - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 20:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can vouch that this is true as far as it goes, however it is also misleading. Tynged means 'destiny' (also 'fate') in modern Welsh and is in everyday use as such, i.e. its primary meaning in modern Welsh has no specific mythological context, although tynged is a recurring theme in early Welsh literature and is very similar to geis in Irish literature and mythology. If an article in a mythological context referring specifically to Welsh myth were to be written on the Welsh wikipedia it would have to be something like 'Tynged (mytholeg Gymreig)' ('Destiny (Welsh mythology)') with a seperate article for tynged (destiny) in general. Hope that answers your question, although I'm still not sure what to do with this stub. Enaidmawr (talk) 01:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Enagás

message: This source seems to say or imply that the MidCat gas pipeline is totally killed off as an intragovernmental project of the nation states of Portugal, Spain and France. from 20 October 2022:  Joint statement by  on energy interconnections. They "decided to abandonc the #Midcat project and instead create, as a matter of priority, a Green Energy Corridor".  
As an observer from outside the region of Europe, I don't understand how big projects are funded?  Does it always have to be political?  Can not a private company decide that their is economic value over the long term in doing a project like a gas pipeline, choose to expend private capital to do the project, apply for regulatory authority approvals as needed, and either build the thing or not based on all that?  Is this not possible in European political economy?  N2e (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MidCat gas pipeline is dead?