lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Kansas City Chiefs seasons

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Winningest in sports articles under discussion
Talk:Robert Sitkoff

message: The second paragraph of the "controversy" section of this article has been added by a former Harvard law student, who is angry about the judgment of the administrative board in a discipline matter involving him. I can assert this because I am a colleague of Rob Sitkoff and that former student has emailed every faculty member with a link to the article, bragging about the post. 
Is such an edit, citing a single Substack article as a source, appropriate? (tbc: I have not discussed this entry with Sitkoff, nor has he asked me to add this entry.)
lessig (talk) 11:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello lessig ~ Bios should not be coatracks for random controversies, even with better sources than that. Thank you for flagging it. – SJ + 06:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Controversy" section of this article
Talk:Wall Street English

message: The article on Wall Street Institute is a promotional article for the institute, against Wikipedia's policy. 87.68.49.166 03:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks.--Chaser - T 04:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:SPAM

message: Citing sources is really important. I removed all the links to the WSI sites for each country and started to use specific webpages as sources for information using: 
   
I hope some editors, even anonymous editors, can use the cite tag to show exactly which webpage we're getting the information from. Cheers. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 12:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing sources 

message: This article should not contain street addresses and phone numbers. Wikipedia is not a directory. 115.138.0.72 (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More spam 

message: I've heard a fair amount of criticism regarding Wall Street Institute, at least in Italy, Portugal and Brazil. Most of what I've read is something like that they try to get clients to get a bank loan to pay for a full year of classes upfront, without making it explicit that it's a bank loan they're actually signing, rather than just enrolling. If the client decides they want to give up classes, for whatever reason - they can't. It's the bank they owe money to, not WSI itself (who's already received the money for the whole year from the bank).
That, and that classes are computer-based with very little human interaction, the standard of quality being deceptively low, and so on. I've seen these reports many times, in consumer reports and the like. I think there were even a few court cases. Seemed to me some very dodgy business practices, from what I can gather. I realized there was someone who tried to add some amount of criticism to the article, but it was completely reverted by another editor. It's spot-clean right now, which is kind of surprising. I don't know enough about this issue to be very useful, but I think that if another editor has the expertise, it'd worth the shot :) 
87.196.55.69 (talk) 20:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just walked into one today, they tried to make me get the loan as well. I know the talk page is not for the general discussion about the subject, but maybe we need to get the attention of local authority, so that we can have some official statement to cite. Dannyniu (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism lacking
Talk:Roger Johansson

message: I suggest this name be changed to samething like Roger Johansson (ice hockey) or similar, because there is another; Roger Johansson of 456 Berea Street, who is a sweedish Web developer. — Lee Carré 02:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The name of this article doesn’t necessarily need to be changed. With only two articles, it’s pretty common to have the more prominent one named normally, and the other one with parentheses. That way the need for a disambiguation page is avoided. Regardless, there really ought to be an article about Roger Johansson (web developer). —Wulf (talk) 02:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name disambiguation
Talk:Dennis Bakhtov

message: The name of the article is incorrect. At no other point in the references is his name spelled that way. I do not see how to easily change it, so we must need to create a whole new page and delete this one. His name is Denis, not Dennis. Tvashtar2919 (talk) 07:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name
Talk:St. Mary of the Angels (Chicago)

message: Hey, I just stumbled over this article. First: It's great, I didn't expect such a good article to be honest :)
It seems though as if somebody was a little bit too inspired by the history of it. "Gleaming cheerfully", just for an example. I tagged the history section as NPOV, if there are objections this would be the discussion about it.
I would also like to propose the deletion or rewriting of the School section, as it seems to be copied of some leaflet (sorry if that's not the case).
Djupp (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV in parts of the article
Talk:Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions

message: The article states that, during a 1969 reorganization, "New appointees included, among others, Alexander Comfort, later to attain fame as the author of The Joy of Sex". However, according to this New Yorker article (see the third-to-last paragraph), Comfort didn't take up this CSDI "post" until 1973, after The Joy of Sex was published: 
In 1973, a few months later, Comfort married his mistress and muse, Jane, and the two moved to Santa Barbara so that Comfort could assume a post at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, a liberal think tank.
Perhaps he had some other involvement with the group starting in 1969, but I can't tell which is correct; perhaps another editor can help resolve this apparent contradiction. Rangergordon (talk) 05:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing of Dr. Alex Comfort's involvement 

message: " a member of the Board of Directors for the Center for Study of Democratic Institutions"
https://manafortdefense.org/a-lifetime-of-service/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.141.95 (talk) 01:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Manafort
Talk:Tamron Hall

message: No need to delete the article. The person who created the article did a cut a paste from MSNBC.com but that can be fixed with some basic copyediting. Wapondaponda (talk) 05:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. The article needs some minor rewriting to take care of any copyright issues, but that's certainly no reason to delete it. Ward3001 (talk) 05:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Hulu is mentioned without any explanation of who or what it/she/he is. Perhaps this is clear enough to US readers, but I doubt many of the rest of us will have any idea - I'd never heard of it. At first I assumed it had already been mentioned and that I'd overlooked it, but a search for the name revealed that it only appears this once. Also, since there's a Wikipedia article on Hulu, there should surely be a link to it (which would allow readers to find out what it is).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.212.50.177 (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hall and Hulu" 

message: Can anyone confirm where her name came from? Tamron the camera company was registered as a trademark in 1958, so it's possibly the inspiration. There is this snippet of information about it, that suggests that it was her mother that gave her the name: 
DavidFarmbrough (talk) 19:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:The Daily Northwestern

message: I'm not going to edit an article about a newspaper I helped staff, but a couple of thoughts:
*Its former staffers are leaders in the world of journalism. Well, some of us. Many of us are not.
*it is run entirely by undergraduates. I think there are some business functions that are not, or at least were not when I was there. Certainly all the news functions are.
Just some minor thoughts.--Mike Selinker (talk) 15:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: couple of comments

message: These statements need proper sourcing to back them up:
*"The Daily is widely considered one of the best college newspapers in the country"
*"Its former staffers are leaders in the world of journalism"
sergeymann (talk) 13:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 
Talk:The Rock (Northwestern University)

message: This article is in desperate need of a photograph. Spikebrennan 22:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about somebody finding a photograph where the Rock is painted purple.  Would make it seem more Northwestern-y. 129.105.19.151 (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: yes.--165.124.198.6 (talk) 22:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  exact coordinates with link to map would be useful!
Talk:Thomas A. DeFanti

message: I just undid the de-wikification of the article, see here by the new user:Tiffanyfox. The article has been carefully constructed according to wikipedia standards, and there seems little need to remove this all. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dewikification undone 

message: Material added after this point in the history contains egregious copyright violations. In addition, it contained insufficient sources to establish notability. Bacrito (talk) 00:15, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to older version. 

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 09:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 

message: Material added after this point in the history contains egregious copyright violations. In addition, it contained insufficient sources to establish notability. 
Keep it up man. 
You just repeated the theft of material from http://www.cs.uic.edu/~tom/
Bacrito (talk) 09:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to older version. 

message: "Your are right about that one example." 
Consider the implications of that sentence, in the light of everything that's been said to Mdd by admins on the copyright issue. He's wasting his time waiting for any of you to turn out to be "wrong" on this stuff. 
And then he says,  
"One way or an other last the July 7, 2009, see here, has to be checked for possible copyvio's, and these have to be solved." This page. 
He's talking about checking "possible copyvio's" in the history of a page on which the copyvio's have already been addressed, in the context of second-guessing the editing done to solve them. 
I'm serious, that is disturbing. Bacrito (talk) 02:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I rephrase "the one" with the specific "Thomas A. DeFanti" I mean. In no way I want or wanted to express it is just one example. See also my talkpage, see for here and on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Systems, see here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please someone, there needs to be a "Mercy rule" here
Talk:Welsh peers and baronets

message: :I oppose the deletion of the artical. The artical is valid because it lists those peers whose titles have a Welsh place-named origion (Anglesea, Dwyfor, Abergavenny for instance) or its territorial qualification is within Wales, such as Baron Champion, of Pontypridd in the County of Glamorgan. It currently states in the artical that Welsh Peers do not form a seperate peerage from the English, British, and UK peerages in and of itself, simply identifies those peers whose titles are of or in Wales. The holder may or may not be of Welsh ethnicity, but the title-holders ethnicity is not the point of the artical at all. There is a valid interest as to what peerage titles are in Wales, as opposed to elsewhere. Drachenfyre 03:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Per Proposed deletion policy: 
*If you disagree: Any editor who disagrees with a proposed deletion can simply remove the tag. Even after the page is deleted, any editor can have the page restored by any administrator simply by asking. In both cases the editor is encouraged to fix the perceived problem with the page. 
*Renominations: Once the proposed deletion of a page has been objected to by anyone, it may not be proposed for deletion again. If an editor still feels the page ought to be deleted, a deletion discussion should be used, as indicated below. Drachenfyre 05:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This subject matter is of interest and use. Drachenfyre 05:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Bizarre that this page was kept. There is no Welsh Peerage. It is just that simple. David Lauder 11:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the article itself makes that clear. It's no more or less accurate than an article on "Yorkshire peers", tho it probably should be more explicit that a peer is not obliged to have any connection with the place they choose as the territory of their peerage.  --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Artical discussion 

message: Seems to me that Wales is top-heavy with Earl titles. I am sure there are more viscounts and barons the we have listed. But I also am sure this is the most comprehensive list so far compiled as well. Ill keep my eye out for more titles, in the mean time good work Glamorgan for adding to it!Drachenfyre 04:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earl Top-heavy 

message: I noticed that this page doesn't include the Baron Kenyon of Gredington in the County of Fling (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Kenyon). Is there a reason for this? 86.24.170.165 (talk) 16:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord Kenyon
Talk:Twin Cities 400

message: The current picture of a "400 series" locomotive is incorrect.  The streamlined locomotive shown was not used on The 400.  This locomotive is really a 4000 Class locomotive used on different trains and the image is cropped such that the fourth digit does not appear.
The 400 started with rebuilt Class E-2a locomotives that were not streamlined.  They were replaced by diesel locomotives.
The original 400 was renamed the Twin Cities 400 as Chicago and North Western added additional 400 trains serving other routes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.139.233.0 (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is correct. I have lost the book I had about the 400 passenger trains, but I believe they might have been used on the Chicago-Omaha Kate Shelley 400, or the Chicago-Mankato Minnesota 400. Group29 (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the image with one of the actual train.  Kablammo (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead picture

message: There is a route-mile discrepancy between the text and the infobox template.  I started a discussion at Template_talk:Twin_Cities_400.  Kablammo (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks! See the discussion for more info on what happened. Group29 (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Distance

message: <
Each 400 train required two steam locomotives, which were swapped partway through the trip, primarily because some grease fittings on the train could not withstand the entire journey at high speed.
> 
Where did the swap take place?
2A00:23C7:D280:D301:7509:3088:8372:8A72 (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  inadequate grease fittings
Talk:List of University of Chicago Press journals

message: I think this page should probably be done as a category--there a a great many more journals, nd it would be easier to maintain. DGG 05:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear God, DGG, let's not get into an edit war over a *tag*! :)Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources. You provided not a source that verifies the content of this article, but a link to an article about a search engine. Pan Dan 12:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Of course not, lets not get in an edit war at all about anything. So, let's discuss it, just what content is it that you challenge? And then I'll source it for you. the general source for information that they publish these journals is the individual listings for each title in Ulrichs, as is the information about when they have published what format, and if you can think of a better way to put it, let me know.  I removed some rather spammy wording from the descriptive text. I added an expand tag, since there is more to say (there's a recent controversy about two of their journals, which needs to be discussed)
As for whether it should be a category, after looking at some other publishers I think the list should go as a category, & I'll do that sometime as well after I get some other opinions  DGG 04:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I think you're right, a category is a good idea here.Don't think of the tag as challenging any specific content, think of it as simply pointing out the need for sources. Pan Dan 13:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]
Talk:Walter Chyzowych

message: More information on Chyzowych’s career in Canada is needed. According to incomplete records, he played for Toronto Italia in 1961 and then Toronto City in 1962, 1963 and 1964. He then played in New York at some point before joining Hamilton Primo in July 1966.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.151.114.72 (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chyzowych in Canada
Talk:Weber Inc.

message: This article looks like it's been gone over by the Weber PR people.  Can it be toned down a bit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.206.146 (talk) 03:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astroturf 

message: If the factory was already producing buoys from half-spheres, why cut them in half? Can we assume that the half-spheres were used for the new barbecue grills before being welded together? Sloppy story-telling, possibly? 86.139.42.39 (talk) 12:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buoys cut in half? 

message: the article needs massive expansion. the lead is very brief. the section namely today is also stub section. thanks, Sushant gupta (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA failed

message: The article as it stands suggests the following timeline: invention > "neighbours" calling it Sputnik > commercialisation in 1952. No one could have made the reference to Sputnik 1 as it was yet to surprise everyone 5 years in the future. The reference provided is to Weber's own site, so should be taken with a hearty grain of salt. I suggest removing this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.230.20 (talk) 13:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Eight years late to fix this, but you're right. I've adjusted the sentence, it's location in the history, and added a source from the Smithsonian. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sputnik 
Talk:William A. Earle

message: Is there really no picture of him without a ridiculous hat on it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.101.118.228 (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually this style -- sometimes called the cossack hat -- was rather popular in winter in northern states and Canada back in the 60s and 70s. Had one myself. Bill Earle wore his all the time in the cold months (and, sure enough, he was wearing it when I took this picture). I always thought it looked good on him. But de gustibus non disputandum est. -- WikiPedant (talk) 19:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:William Kellogg (Illinois politician)

message: William Kellogg's entry in the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress contains a great deal of misinformation, and reference to this entry has been omitted from the revised Wikipedia entry for William Kellogg (Illinois).Kenrossalex (talk) 23:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification for deleting references to the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress
Talk:Guilty Men

message: The link to Frank Owen directs to a 'wrong' Frank Owen, namely an American baseball player. Norvo 04:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank Owen 

message: Peter Howard was unconventional, but hardly left wing. Norvo 04:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left Wing Journalists? 

message: This is a good article but it would be better if it included the list of "guilty men".  Unfortunately the Penguin reprint is already hard to get hold of so I'm unable to add the list myself. Marshall46 (talk) 10:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Marshall46 (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who were the guilty men? 

message: Any particular reason why The bomber will always get through is linked to this article? I mean it's kind of related, but there's a lot of other stuff about the build up to the Second World War that would be more relevant. -- Phil Barker 12:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  It is kind of related because the fear of aerial bombardment contributed to the pacifism and appeasement of the 'thirties, but, I agree, there are probably more relevant links.  Marshall46 (talk) 15:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: The article says that Guilty Men sold 200,000 copies in a few weeks.  I have the 34th impression, printed in 1941, which says on the dust jacket "178,000 COPIES!"  Marshall46 (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 

message: I cut this sentence:  "Some have queried its exclusive identification of appeasement with the Conservative Party, noting that the Labour Party's pacifist leader George Lansbury (1932–1935) had vehemently opposed re-armament or any use of military force, and that Labour continued to criticize arms spending until 1937."  The book includes a powerful attack on Lansbury (quoting Ernest Bevin's famous statement about him hawking his conscience around and asking to be told what to do with it) and criticises Labour pacifism pre-1935.  Marshall46 (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour Party 

message: The article says that Beaverbrook "made do with the royalties from Guilty Men" (no source). This is unclear because (a) he was not the author and (b) because we are told later that the authors' agent absconded with the royalties. How could Beaverbrook have got any material benefit from the book?  Pelarmian (talk) 09:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royalties 
Talk:Higher Love

message: Should mention the cover by James Vincent McMorrow  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.149.124.19 (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of Google hits for that name.  I thought at first he was lyricist.  Cover artist only?  rags (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered my own question.  He was not involved in writing the song.  Well worth a listen, though.  I have heard him sing his own music, now, and I am looking forward to hearing this cover, in particular, as I think his voice is well-fitted to the song.  rags (talk) 22:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: McMorrow