Talk:Crotale (missile)

message: Where did the Chinese fish the plans for the Crotale? David.Monniaux 09:08, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRC HQ7 version 

message: of finland, with the pictures of the CROTALE NG should be removed from this article as these both the system and the missile are totally different. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.248.159.240 (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every mention 

message: I'd like to propose we separate the R440 and Crotale NG into 2 wikipedia entries. -- Adeptitus 17:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crotale NG and Multi-Shield 100 

message: Perhaps some mention should be made of the Liberty SAM which was developed for the United States FAAD program before losing out to ADATS? The Crotale NG with it's VT-1 missile is largely based of the technology developed during the FAAD program.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.80.127.242 (talk) 02:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberty missile: 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/projects/crotale/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Why do the missile tubes in the top photograph appear to be much more slender and/or longer than the other images? They look like they are half the thickness of the other tubes in the other photos. They look like they are sized to fit a missile the shape of a Sidewinder missile, but the other tubes are far thicker and/or shorter. Why is that? Are those like quad-launch tubes, with four missiles in each tube, or what?
Also, I'm really questioning the claim that the launcher on shown at the bottom is a "stealth" launcher. There is nothing stealthy about that launcher; look at all those bare steel fittings and parts, round tubes with exposed brackets. All of those would be very visible to radar. A single small cowling that looks vaguely "Stealthy-shaped" does not make it a "stealth" launcher, even if it is in fact made out of the right material. I would like to see a strong reference for that claim before I believed it. Just because it looks like it's stealthy doesn't mean that it actually is. That's like saying putting a faceted "stealth" nose-cone on a B-52 is going to make it s "stealthy" aircraft. Not bloody likely. It might reduce the total average  signature by a percent or two, but it is by no means going to make it "stealthy"..45Colt 22:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos and captions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Crotale (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727064411/http://www.marineweek.org/sea_port/exhibiting/exhibitors_view.php?index=&row_no=110&where=&what=&sort=a.company&order=ASC&eid=121 to http://www.marineweek.org/sea_port/exhibiting/exhibitors_view.php?index=&row_no=110&where=&what=&sort=a.company&order=ASC&eid=121
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017181104/http://jdw.janes.com/public/adlink/ads/1156765.pdf to http://jdw.janes.com/public/adlink/ads/1156765.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Ecartometry doesn't seem to be an English word. Triangulation or trigonometry would seem to be closer. I suspect the system is close to an Automatic command to line-of-sight system.
https://www.linguee.com/french-english/translation/%C3%A9cartom%C3%A9trie.html --Kitchen Knife (talk) 14:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: écartométrie / Ecartometry