Talk:My Sassy Girl

message: It seems these are the posts by the author, in korean:
http://blue.utb.edu/tyi/Korean/yubgi/yubgi01.htm
Should it be put in the links section?
And someone put a translation of some chapters here:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293715/board/nest/55549493—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.66.219.58 (talk • contribs).
:Unless there are reliable sources which state that, no. --Crossmr 06:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia no longer carries spoiler warnings.--Atlantima (talk) 01:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original story

message: This article, while very complete, is written like a forum post and should be rewritten. --Victor 3 July 2005 12:45 (UTC)
:I've done some cleaning up, but it could benefit from the attention of someone who has actually seen the movie. -- Visviva 08:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like a forum post

message: Is there still going to be an American remake of this film? I've heard that there won't be ... SyFyMichael 03:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there might be a remake of this movie. It might be a bad remake though.  --Snkcube 04:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly hate remakes of anything, but to tell you the truth, dubs and remakes are getting better abd better over the years, IMO, especially with anime dubs.  The voices aren't as good as the seiyu yet but they're getting there... sort of. --Kiriyama 20:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Roy Lee is the guy (or one of the guys) behind all of these remakes. It doesn't stop at the few you mentioned, just look at his IMDb page. He lacks any respect for the history of film, which is ultimately proven by the Ikiru remake that will soon be a reality. Robixsmash 19:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  American movie? 

message: The interesting facts section needs some major cleanup. A lot of it is opinion and conjecture and none of it is sourced. It also needs to be renamed "Trivia" or something similar because interesting facts expressed an opinion about the facts, see WP:NPOV.--Crossmr 18:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has already overhauled it, but from what I understand, a lot of the "interesting facts" come off of the director's commentary on the r3k DVD. Robixsmash 07:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: There is no indication that this was based on a non-fiction novel, and I have removed the category.  If someone wants to provide rationale for that, they can add it back in.  Leaptad (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Films Based on Non-Fiction Novels 

message: Gyeon-woo says he likes "that George Winston song" and then hums some of the melody but this is not sufficient for attributing the album's track to him. The piece by Winston is called "Variations on the Kanon by Johann Pachelbel" which is not credited on the soundtrack listing, Winston is not credited as composer on the album or in the film credits and many people have composed variations on the centuries old original and this is just one more which is why it doesn't sound like Winston's. Waerloeg (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canon variations composer