Talk:Tomorrow series

message: could we do something about young adult invasion novel?, that sounds like underage erotica to me. 207.161.179.80 (talk) 02:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First line 

message: i'm fairly sure the entire plot summaries section is plagiarised from 'the tomorrow series web companion'. i haven't got a link to the site right now, and i won't tag it for copyvio because it's very possible the owner of this information put it up. did whoever put it up have permission. if not can someone obtain it or else rewrite the summaries. i may or may not draft a rewrite of the summaries: otherwise they should be deleted.Flage 07:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote all the plot summaries from my own memory (I may not have been logged in at the time, though; can't remember.) I don't think I used the "web companion", though. In fact I'm not sure I've even heard of it. Battle Ape 12:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright infringement

message: Could I suggest to all editors and people commenting on this article to keep in mind that it is fiction and, as such, the author was quite entitled to make their own decisions about what was or was not possible and what the reactions of others may or many not have been. Please be civil to other users but also refrain from posting edits unrelated to improving the article. Thankyou! --AlisonW 16:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Our criticism doesn't matter anyway, as content should only be added if it's notable. No way am I adding to any criticism section that '[User's name] of Wikipedia [link to this talk page] stated that [insert alleged plot hole here] reduced his experience of the book'. By all means, include in the article what the reviewers thought, but realize that this isn't a book club - our opinions matter zilch. --Safe-Keeper 01:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby, Pram, etc. 

message: Any ideas?Flage 03:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hard not to include some form of spoiler material once you've read the entire series. It's a good idea but somewhat unrealistic. The books tend to merge together in your mind ~Sushi 10:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More spoiler-free material

message: Shouldn't something be said about the novel's similarities with the film, Red Dawn? McDanger 09:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Dawn

message: There are no spoiler warnings and hardly any spoiler free info? Death.by.maggots 00:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers

message: :Image:Tommorowwhenwarbegan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 10:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Tommorowwhenwarbegan.jpg

message: The discussion page should not be used to discuss whether the book is good or bad or if there are parts of the storyline which may not seem 'logical' or if the story is possible or likely. The fact is that the book has become an extremely popular piece of literature and is widley popular, especially in Australia.  --124.180.159.96 (talk) 07:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion topics 

message: Hi all, just thought I'd point this out. There seems to be an error in the section regarding Corrie's character description. It seems someone has edited this section and made it completely false, stating that Corrie gets shot in the leg and Kevin "thrusts his [combat knife] into all their hearts" Heres  what has been edited into the article:
Corrie was thinking about the show grounds. Robyn and Corrie waited for the others. At the thought of the showgrounds, Corrie got a sick feeling in her stomach and a hard lump at the back of her throat. The more Corrie thought about her friends’ location, the more Corrie was upset. It could have been fate that we had been in Hell on the exact day of the invasion of the town. At least for a few seconds everything was dead quiet. The invaders only fired one more shot, one bullet was all they needed. The bullet hit Corrie’s leg and she hit the ground. She lyed there reviewing the time she had spent with us’, how’d she wished her family would be safe. Kevin fired another shot towards the invaders. As he sprinted into the enemy lines he drew out his combat knife from his belt. He thrusts his blade into all their hearts. Kevin butchered all of them. The others and I rushed over to aid her. Robyn held her hand to assure Corrie would be fine. We all knew that this wasn’t the case. It became harder and harder for her to breath. Each breath was more painful than the last.
It is obvious that this is NOT coherent with the storyline, as Kevin never had a "Combat Knife" at any point in the story. Could someone please fix this problem, otherwise remove the section entirely. I would do it myself, but i am not too familiar with the editing system in Wikipedia.
Also, i noticed that under the Fiona Maxwell character description it states "...knows virtually nothing about camping or living in the bush, but she always has her period on time." If this could also be fixed, much thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.212.81 (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Error/Vandalism 

message: I'd like to suggest that the Ellie Chronicles section at the bottom be split off into its own page. The Tomorrow series and the Ellie Chronicles are two separate series, and as such each should its own page. It would only make sense to have the Ellie Chronicle on this page if the page title were something that covered them both - but I don't think any overall title for both exist. --JoelBarnes (talk) 15:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to say that I agree with this --Sauronjim (talk) 13:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Nick carson (talk) 13:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spliting off the Ellie Chronicles section

message: Why is the second book in the series missing from this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.3.65.1 (talk) 02:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead of Night 

message: Everyone please stop arguing about the logistics of the book... write to John Marsden or something.
It's just a book.
And anyway you're ruining the entertainment value.Htimsleinahtan (talk) 12:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is a bit silly. I wonder if those same people complain about the lack of credibility in Alice in Wonderland? Anyway, this Discussion page is for discussing improvements to the article, not whinging about a book. HiLo48 (talk) 12:12, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a book. It doesn't need to be logical. 

message: I noticed this in the plot of the first book:
"Ellie, Kevin, and Corrie are chased by soldiers from the showground after seeing a man get shot for attacking a soldier..."
I just read the book last week. Nobody got shot or attacked a soldier. They only witnessed someone asking the soldier permission to go to the toilet. -Htimsleinahtan (talk) 12:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to change the article to reflect what the book actually says. (You seem to be quite familiar with it.) HiLo48 (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This didn't happen. 

message: Putting an article about the proposed (and delayed) start of work on the second film in the series here for future use.
*http://if.com.au/2011/02/26/article/GWBYJZSZBV.html
-- saberwyn 09:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Film sequel

message: hi all. just a question to see if people who know aussie farming may know better. in book 4 darkness be my friend on either page 88 or 91 based on your book version is a line with Ellie passing a "crop of rape" ready for harvesting in a month or 2. what is  a crop of rape? ive never heard that tearm before. i would assume its ment to be crop of grapes but considerign how often this book has been published over the years and mine is atleast a 2008 copy based on publish details on front i find it hard to believe a typo like this would last so long. can someone clarrify what it means?152.91.9.153 (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this a typo or a type of sheep 

message: There are spoilers in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Main Editor Of The Internet (talk • contribs) 22:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPOILER ALERT 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tomorrow series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090619081417/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/film/news/e3iecfa450e38f03b772d4e458e999c8f5c to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3iecfa450e38f03b772d4e458e999c8f5c
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This book series is not about politics, it is about surviving while hiding and while normal infastructure is not available (no supermarkets, no school, no parents), and, eventually, is about rescuing their parents and neighbors and themselves from capture.  While this does help lead to the end of the war, and a radical change for both sides, it is just not what this book series is about.   Thus, a third of the synopsis should not be focused on it.
The "invading force" is purposefully never named, and is not important to the story, and its speculation serves no purpose in the story.   
The reason the forces invaded (lack of space and resources in their own land) is mentioned, but is in no way primary to the story.
The cited refugee problem is never mentioned nor explored, and is not part of the story in any way.
The story and the characters would be the same, no matter who or why their homeland was invaded.  
   Knowing this background adds nothing to the story.
The South Pacific's eventual resolution is past the end of this story and plays no part in it.
Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.138.107 (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of current events should be removed from the synopsis.