lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:First City Hall (Ottawa)

message: If I understand correctly, the building was constructed as West Ward Market Building (Ottawa) and then converted into First City Hall (Ottawa), then demolished. It's the same structure and should have one article, IMO. I'd suggesting merging and redirecting the market article to this one. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source confirming they are the same building? --Padraic 19:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles themselves.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ...which have no sources, except for a broken link. --Padraic 20:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. We have two unsourced articles, both apparently about the same building, one for its market phase and another for its town hall phase (apparently not uncommon, Bonsecours Market has played the same dual role). It would seem strange to me to preserve this duplication on the lack of sources, since that in itself is a basis for deleting, not retaining, an article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I would merge the two articles, and then slap the merged article with an unreferenced tag.  Padraic is absolutely correct in being cautious, given the lack of sources, but upon reflection, my opinion is that keeping two unsourced stubs is less desirable than the merge.  The articles state that it was the same building.  If after the merge it turns out that they were separate buildings, or perhaps there is a more complicated explanation that would perhaps warrant two separate articles, then we can split them.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Estrada Courts

message: This is a stub. Please feel free to add photos of the Estrada Court Murals.  Joaquin Murietta 23:26, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos needed

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* I agree with the move - Since this is a public housing project, it should not take the name format used by neighborhoods. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Nicholas Street Gaol

message: There seems to be some dispute over content here. Whilst I think both sides have some valid points some sort of compromise needs to be reached. Please discuss changes here rather than continually reverting each other's edits. Just my initial thoughts, these categories are not necessary:  
* Backpacking   
* Adventure travel 
these categories relate to more generic articles than specific hostels. thanks Michellecrisp (talk) 03:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: oops just noticed there was some discussion on your user talk pages.Michellecrisp (talk) 03:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was just thinking how disjointed the conversation would appear to anyone who was reading only one of our 2 pages. Maybe we should copy it over to here.--JeffJ (talk) 14:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, certainly it would be easier to get consensus on article changes. Michellecrisp (talk) 03:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Content Dispute
Talk:Ashley Revell

message: I watched the video clip, was it poorly edited? Because it clearly shows chips being put on "1st 12" which is not a 50:50 chance of him doubling up (which "Red" would have given him), but rather a 33:66 chance of tripling up. Anyone know the source from which the claim of betting on "red" comes from? 75.158.104.172 (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  his bet -- was it on "red" or on "1st 12"? 

message: If he lived in London, where they have legal casino gambling, why did he go all the way to Las Vegas to place his bet?  He would have had a better chance at winning on his local British roulette wheels, anyway, since London casinos only have a single 0, while the wheels in Las Vegas have both 0 and 00.  74.131.58.249 (talk) 23:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  So ...
Talk:Terrasses de la Chaudière

message: The "Sick building syndrome" affected this building; because of sealed windows to save energy, the recirculated air bothered people and made some people sick, particularly with the toxic gases given off by synthetics in carpeting and from photocopiers.
As a result, the building's name was mocked as the "Franglais" expression "Les Terrasses de la Shoddy Air". GBC (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building name slammed 

message: Robert Campeau built and owned it in 1978, then later he went bankrupt, and in 2017 he died. So who owns the building now?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.138.201.227 (talk) 08:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the Treasury Board website, the facility is crown owned: https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/dfrp-rbif/pn-nb/07608-eng.aspx Lusciousmangoes (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership?
Talk:Randy Disher

message: Hey, in one episode, Mr. Monk Gets Cabin Fever, Randy says he DOES NOT have an uncle...
But then he gets one in Mr. Monk Visits a Farm
Should this be mentioned in the article??? TwistedGuitars (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle?!? 

message: It lists his first appearance as "Mr. Monk and the Candidate", but it that episode the characters name was never menchend except in the credits as "Deacon". What do you think?
Caleb (talk) 03:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance 

message: In the personality section, there are observations about Disher that may be missing. It seems that when Disher takes over for Captain Stottlemeyer in leading the Division, he actually performs an excellent job at it. This leads to believe that he, unconsciously or not, is limiting his own intelligence and increasing his apparent incompetence and bafoonery. The most obvious support for this position comes from "Mr. Monk and the Miracle", when Stottlemeyer temporarily quits the force and enters a monastery, but also shows up in bits and pieces throughout the series when Stottlemeyer is temporarily away from homicide.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.139.35 (talk) 17:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Homicide Division Leader without Stottlemeyer?
Talk:Single European Act

message: European Single Market should not redirect here.
:I agree and was about to post the same thing. The Single Market should have its own page, it is not reducible to the SEA in any way. Blankfrackis (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text says that the object of the Act was to create a Common Market.  Is this true?  Why not a Single Market? --Red King (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the body of the article says "Single Market", I assume that "Common Market" was vandalism and so I have changed it.  --Red King (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Market or Single Market? 

message: Does this section really add anything to this article ? In particular, the four lines about "Vote Leave" seem quite out of place.
Noliscient (talk) 12:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK interpretation and UK withdrawal
Wikipedia talk:Snapshots

message: Has the Wikipedia considered selling a set of CDs, like once a year, in order to fund the hypothetical non-profit organization?  If it were contracted out for a few thousand sets of 10-100? CDs, prices could be kept fairly reasonable.
~ender 2003-04-15 04:01 MST
Consider the fact that anyone can sell wikipedia on cds, books and etc and has no obligation in contributing any fee to the wikipedia. So wikipedia is not in any privileged position to sell it's database, a press industry would make books quicker, and a cd seller would make cd-roms faster (and maybe cheaper) than wikimedia foundation hiring someone. The best is that anyone who ever made money from wikipedia content be nice and donate part of it's profit to the wikimedia.
--Alexandre Van de Sande 11:10, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Database on CD? 

message: For those of you interested in publishing an offline Wikipedia snapshot, validating articles or moving towards Wikipedia-1.0, I have documented the quite successful efforts of the German team at German Wikipedia. AxelBoldt 01:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offline publication efforts of German Wikipedia documented 

message: Are snapshot versions of Wikipedia still a concern? Sorry that I've got to cut this so short, Geekdiva (talk) 03:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep [[Template:Update]] or change it to [[Template:Historical]]?
Talk:Tom Freda

message: I'm not certain, but I think that's something Wikipedia frowns on. Tom Freda is a public person & removing material simply because he wants it moved is tricky stuff. But again, I'm not certain of this. GoodDay (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't check the policy either but CCR, which has been very helpful in providing information so far (with many more entries to come), sent me this in an email: "Due to recent news regarding identity theft and to safeguard the privacy of his family, Tom has requested the following be deleted from his Wikipedia entry ...." I see the request as perfectly reasonable so I didn't question it. - McRuf2 (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about the person and unless his spouse and children become more noteworthy in his story it seems fine to pull that information. That said anyone can re-add it again so just note as subject's stated privacy concerns if it needs to be removed again. Banjeboi 21:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing material at subject's request
Talk:Shigin

message: This is my first article.  Apologies for any mistakes - very grateful for any comments or improvements.  Thanks! -  Hongshi 09:10, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Apologies

message: This article was passed well before the current review process for GA's and currently this article is lacking what GAs should be expected to have today, including in-line references and a better structure to the article.  I've put this article up on WP:GA/R for review. --Masem 23:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have decided to enact WP:SNOWBALL and boldy delist this article as it was passed before criteria was put in place. This article clearly fails to meet that criteria, however, should the article be brought up to standards, it may be nominated at WP:GAC. Regards, Lara♥Love 03:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: My opinion may not offer much to the discussion, but as a practicioner of shigin in Japan I find this article to be highly accurate and informative.  I could not see any places to add or correct any relavant information.Obakedake (talk) 03:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:GA/R|GA Re-review]]

message: I have issues with the translation of the Chinese poem on the page, as the translation is not faithful. Who translated it? I propose to replace it. Denihilonihil (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it seems to be a quite literal translation of the poem, which ignores the layers of meaning often found in gin.  I have a few translations I've written myself of various gin, but I don't think any of them are up to the standards of posting here.  If you have any recommended translations please post them here.Obakedake (talk) 03:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of the poem

message: There is no link to a Chinese article, but only a Chinese example.
G. Robert Shiplett 18:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Japanese example?
Talk:Swedish welfare

message: This article has nothing to do with the Scandinavian movement (a movement promoting cultural pan-scandinavism and political union between Denmark, Sweden and Norway). The article is really about the Scandinavian welfare model.
::Ppl and their national pride, I am a Swede... Even if you call something like... the Stockholm syndrome it doesn't mean that it don't occur in other cities. The Scandinavian countries are very similar in traditions and culture so yes its kind of an Scandinavian model. The Norweigian way is the most lucrative... But the model is called Svenska modellen. I point out that the model is not what it was but still...
--213.114.119.244 (talk) 01:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  WTF I am a Dane, and the problem i see here, is that this artical, is describing the scandinavian universal model, as if it was a swedish invention. 
Svenska Modellen, hmm... it is not called svenska modellen in Norway or Denmark.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.255.48.83 (talk) 04:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Headline

message: It would appear that the person or persons selecting the external links had an agenda... - 81.232.2.123 22:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does not seem balanced, yes. Perhaps someone could add reliable sources more supportive of Sweden's welfare? --Childhood's End 14:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced ext-links 

message: the links are not neutral as far as i can tell, any thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.93.191.147 (talk) 23:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  links are not neutral 

message: I believe the article at this point is fairly balanced, but the links should be more than simply "critical" ones (at least the person with the agenda had the decency to label it as such).  The critical links should not be removed, as they are of good quality, but they should be offset by an equally competent defense of the system.  Should the reader want more in depth coverage of the issue and the debate that surrounds it, the links need to provide a varied opinion on the matter.72.92.16.193 05:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To me the article still sounds too laudatory or apologetic.  It also lacks any references for several of its arguments, which do not help this impression.  The Jade Knight (talk) 11:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 

message: Should this article be merged with Social security (Sweden) and Folkhemmet. They all discuss the same topic just from different angles. 85.235.250.110 (talk) 14:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging articles?
Talk:Adolphe Willette

message: Well, I just merged these two pages. They are, after all, the same person. But there has been some nice effort to write both articles and I'm reluctant to just wade in and mash the two together. I hope someone with some knowledge keeps an eye on this page and wants to work on it. --Bookandcoffee 19:12, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: The article doesn't seem to have any continuity between his artistic life and his political life.  Are we even sure the "anti-semite" candidate is the same person?--Pharos 23:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissonance 
Talk:Congressional Record

message: A considerable amount of material is produced by agencies to answer congressional queries resulting in production of documents called "statements for the record". I am editing some articles such as the GAO article that produce such statements and want to add material into this article for that purpose to allow the reader to understand more of the detail. 
Also added citation needed to "From a legal standpoint, most materials in the Congressional Record are classified as secondary authority." ..this is a significant claim to make.. I have no interest in its content (NPOV) but it still needs to be supported by a cite... Thanks
Risk Engineer (talk) 13:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "statement for the record" reference  
Talk:Red sonja

message: 2 days ago, I created an article about 1985 sword and sorcery motion picture Red Sonja and placed it to Red Sonja (check article Red Sonja history). I also moved the comic book character article to his correct place Red Sonya. But an user Kchishol1970 wiped my work and moved article to an unsuitable place “Red Sonja (movie)”. Therefore, I moved the article to a more suitable place Red sonja. But he again moved it a to third place “Red sonja (movie)” without a good reason. I believe Red Sonja is exactly place for this article since the character's article already exists Red Sonya but preventing my self in wiping war I choosed this place as a second choice, so please don’t move the article to any third place like “Red Sonja (movie)” since its hard to find or search for a new user. However, we can still make decisions for its correct place Red Sonja. Place your opinions here
spmeka 01:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, we are not supposed to move an already existing article without a good reason. The comic book character's name is Red Sonja, as we can see on its cover picture, therefore it shouldn't be moved. I don't see any problem with the article name Red Sonja (movie). It is quite common practice here to disambiguate articles about subjects of same name by attaching "(movie)", "(film)" etc. If you are concerned with the user search I suggest to make a disambiguation page to list both Red Sonja articles, the movie and the cartoon, to let the user know where to go. --BorgQueen 01:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Alexis Stewart

message: This page was a redirect to Martha Stewart, apparently because of vandalism.  Let's see if this sticks.  71.195.206.168 01:21, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Completed the page

message: I noticed that her birthday has been changed from 9/27 to 26 1965, a quick search to imdb and other places shows 9/27/65. Does anyone know what the correct day is? Danger bird (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the version of the article before a cat-and-mouse series of vandal changes and reversions started. The vandal is using a series of sockpuppet accounts to avoid a block. It shows the correct day. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Birthday?
Talk:Dword (Computer)

message: Last time that I checked, a dword is a 32-bit Unsigned Integer which can also contain non-Null Terminated Strings. This is true right?
:No, that's definately not true. The only thing I can think of that's even close is that in PalmOS, 32-bit values are occaisionally treated as 4 character strings for database identifiers. This article probably should be deleted unless it's expanded to have some useful information. Timbatron 20:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsigned Integer
Talk:Gumball machine

message: Interesting addition on the Wayne Thiebaud painting, but wouldn't it be more appropriate on the Wayne Thiebaud article than under gumball machines?  Maybe reduce the paragraph to a sentence or so.  Anyway, I'll leave it as it is for now until we decide what to do with it. Deatonjr 11:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: History of the Bluebird gumball machine 2605:A601:AC62:E500:DCD9:38A9:8B31:DD82 (talk) 04:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bluebird gumball machine, history? 

message: Smithsonian Institute, published 1991, 1994?... Reference guide 2605:A601:AC62:E500:DCD9:38A9:8B31:DD82 (talk) 04:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silent Salesmen, Volume I, Volume II, plus price guideBill Enes
Talk:Native copper

message: *No. This article is about a unique and important mineral species with a significant role in the history of mining and humanity quite separate from the element copper. It is in need of expansion, but not merging. Vsmith 01:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Micha Josef Berdyczewski

message: Nice work! I recommend the following resources for improving this and similar articles.
* Library of Congress authorities files for finding documented forms of people's names
* Articles such as "Micha Josef Berdyczewski" at Institute for Translation of Hebrew Literature
* Aleph library catalog at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, which has exceptionally extensive holdings in Judaica
* Library catalog at the Jewish National and University Library, the official depository library of Israel
--Hoziron 02:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources for improvement 
Talk:Millions More Movement

message: Given the controversy/debate that ensued following the Million Man March, I think it would be beneficial to include the estimated/official crowd sizes (when each becomes available). - Refugee621 02:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Crowd size?

message: This page, and Louis Farrakhan, are in major need of updating. freestylefrappe 23:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating

message: I deleted this section. Whether or not the crowd exceeded 1 million is the subject of some controversy. A research study cited in the 'Million Man March' article states that one million people was within the error estimate, and the people who organised the march estimated much higher. In contrast the police estimated much lower. Given that, it is erroneous for us to state with certainty the number who attended either march. --Davril2020 06:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: But at the moment there is absolutely nothing in the article to indicate how much impact this event made. Carina22 20:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-trivia
Talk:Consumption

message: What is the relationship between this article and the article for TB?  This one has POV problems. "That should have been the end of the story"!...--Zachbe (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Consumption is a disambiguation page that should only give redirects to articles.  So I've removed the TB text that was added by 59.92.164.141 from Consumption.  Since none of the text was cited, it didn't make sense to merge the text into the tuberculosis article.  (Cross-posted to Talk:Tuberculosis)  –panda (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integration with TB?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia as a source

message: Does it make a differnce if Wikipedia actually serves as a source reference by the various organizations here or if Wikipedia is merely a recommened link.  I ask because the Government of Canada does link to Wikipedia's article on Same-Sex marriage but it did not use it as a source when drafting the legislation.  Martin-C 02:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2005
Talk:Grenadian Creole

message: This article needs to be expanded. Gringo300 02:47, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more

message: This article covers two topics, and so seems to me should be split per WP:CONSPLIT into one article on the English Creole and one on the French Creole. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two topics