lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A.C.M.

message: This page is a redirect to ACM but that page is now a redirect to Association for Computing Machinery.  Please bypass the double-redirect.  --Russ (talk) 14:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and thank you. GDonato (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 7 July 2007 

message: This page should be redirected to ACM, as it is now a disambiguation page and not a redirect. snigbrook (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: - thanks!Skier Dude (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 16 August 2009 

message: Could the following text:
Category:Protected redirects
...please be replaced with the following text:
...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 06:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 19 September 2014
Talk:Proposed NHS Redress (Wales) Measure 2008

message: Once this has become law, the article should be moved to a new location called "NHS Redress (Wales) Measure 2007" and should be added to the List of Measures of the National Assembly for Wales article. Amlder20 14:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I read this before joining and there are two pages, they shall be joined soon. Enter2010 (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:2007 UEFA Super Cup

message: For many artciles theres always that same picture with the soccer field, and the players with their coloured jerseys with name below, showing the club formation, i was wondering if anyone is making one for this article because i dont know how  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.211.49.20 (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Match line-ups 
Talk:Saera Khan

message: "She was the only member of the Storting of immigrant background..."
Isn't it somewhat imprecise to speak of her having an immigrant background if she was born in Oslo? Akhtar Chaudhry is an actual immigrant. Moravice (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As "Saera" is first name, but not the last name. Hence this should be Khan Saera, as she appears in her publications as "Sa. Khan" but not "Saera K." For proper recognition can be added redirection "Saera Khan" -> "Khan Saera" for every case, but seems this is improper entitled article due to quite rare for English language female name of Saera. Consider please moving page as described above. Ocexyz (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move this article to "Khan Saera"
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jaranda (reconfirmation)

message: For this edit. I was trying to make my !vote but I'd forgotten I was editing a previous version in the history. I think I have figured out how it happened too. The weird thing is I definitely didn't get the usual warning you get when you edit a previous version. Oh well. Sorry. Thanks to Majorly for reverting it and to Gaillimh for pointing out my finger trouble. --John 03:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Weird edit I made; any ideas how this happened? as it seems this is far from being an unknown issue. --John 01:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My apologies
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Boise Regions

message: With the deletion of the Diocese of Boise St Augustines Catholic Center article, I unlinked St. Augustine's Catholic Center Parish on the this article. I added an intro to this article as well. I have some ideas for adding info to the list for specific parishes. Unfortunately, I don't know what was in the deleted article. I suggest something like the following:
* Moscow - St. Mary's Parish
* Moscow - St. Augustine's Catholic Center Parish
This parish church (chapel, etc.) is located adjacent to the University of Idaho campus in Moscow, Idaho. The chapel was built in ???? and serves as the Catholic Student Center on campus. The building has a round design and contains ???? special features.
Subsequent paragraph info
* Orofino - St. Therese's Of The Little Flower Parish
I am making up all this info about St. Auggies, but I do think it is a round church. (I drive past it 5 days a week, so I should actually know this.) At some point, I hope to do an article on Churches in Moscow and this info could be moved there and wikilinked. In the meantime, this might be a good way to convey the info without a specific article. --Robbie Giles 16:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put in skeleton info and reformatted the ref section. --Robbie Giles 00:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, that would probably be the best way to do it. I guess that most of the churches would have stubs at best. --Maiios 18:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I went ahead and created the Moscow, Idaho Churches article. Take a look at it and play with it. I will add some information later if I can --Maiios 20:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: North Central Deanery
Talk:R108 road (Ireland)

message: Route seems to be incorrect as it terminates at the junction with the N81 at Christchurch.Deitel55 (talk) 20:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right - I've fixed it. Sarah777 (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:N81 road (Ireland)

message: This needs updating, along with very many roads articles written between 2004 to 2010. Sarah777 (talk) 22:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have revised this article using the new route definition from the 2012 legislation. I have no idea how many other routes were amended by the legislation but it may be a large task to identify route changes in 2012 and to implement the revisions in Wikipedia. Two Statutory Instruments are relevant: Statutory Instrument 53 of 2012 redefines the national routes while Statutory Instrument 54 redefines the regional routes. — O'Dea (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision required
Talk:R136 road (Ireland)

message: Note the width of this road; the land-take was originally intended to facilitate a dual-carriageway with a jersey barrier in the centre and two lanes plus hard shoulder in each direction. After the brain-dead suggestion by the anti-roads lobby that the first phase be composed of a bus lane running outside that hard shoulder was subject to ridicule and had to be abandoned, this section was redesigned to ensure there was only room for a bus lane plus single traffic lane. However the blithering idiots (can I say that?) didn't realise that the route had little bus potential (no access to populated areas for half its route) - but they decided to plonk barricades in the bus-lanes - just in case they might be used. This road cost over  €40 million to acquire the land and build. Doubtless when this situation comes to public notice CIE will be commissioned to run empty buses up and down the lanes - at more cost to the taxpayer. Sarah777 (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Off-article observations
Talk:Khmer Issarak

message: The footnotes, which appear extensive, need to be correctly added to the entry. 
teneriff (talk) 20:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that these were added by the IP 203.113.233.49. They're strongly indicative of text lifted from a copyright source, and while I can't find anything online, I hope that an expert we can find will be able to trace it and initiate a full rewrite. The source is unlikely to be any of Ben Kiernan's works, as he is cited. Itsmejudith (talk) 22:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten a lot of the original text and got rid of some errors (in particular, the author seemed to think Achar Mean and Son Ngoc Minh were two different people). I'll get some inline refs in presently.Svejk74 (talk) 08:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2007 comment 

message: Two years are given as the founding year: 1940 and 1945. Which one is it?--Nedergard (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding: 1940 or 1945 

message: This organization used a different flag. This flag would later be used by the pro-Vietnamese movement and government, People’s Republic of Kampuchea.
•Source: https://cne.wtf/2021/10/03/splits-alliances-history-of-the-khmer-issarak-part-two/ .——Daeva Trạc (talk) 13:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Khmer People's National Liberation Front

message: The use of all these acronyms is confusing, for the right wing rebel groups can we designate the term royalist and nationalist before the acronym to designate the faction the body is part of.  --J intela (talk) 08:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disorienting Acronyms 
Talk:R509 road (Ireland)

message: This really needs an info box giving the route as the Childers Road and 509 only overlap in a section. See R112 as an example. Also a photo is needed - is there a law against taking pictures in Limerick?! Sarah777 (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This was very out-of-date. I imagine that applies to many R roads. Sarah777 (talk) 13:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating
Talk:R639 road (Ireland)

message: I've done a quick rewrite of all sections. I've brought it up to date, touched up its appearance, and improved the flow of the text. I've also added a brief 'landmarks' section, as I thought this was relevent and links this page with numerous other Tipperary-related articles. Feel free to add more information. (Furet).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asteroid (talk • contribs) 12:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up and addition of new section

message: I've added a new section to reflect the construction history of the route and supplied academic and historical references, too.Seighean (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of History section

message: Is it time to reassess this article's rating? It's certainly one of the best Irish road articles. Seighean (talk) 02:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know what the standard required here might be. Perhaps ask Wwcensor2? Sarah777 (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article?
Talk:Harriet (name)

message: *Methinks the title of this article disambiguates pre-emptively. The word Harriet on its own currently redirects to Harriet (name). However, since the main article subject is the name, we should namespace the article at Harriet and then either change or just delete the redirect. Unless anyone objects, i'll probably flag it for  after a few days. Cheers, tomasz. 20:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Namespace at "Harriet"?

message: I am not a contributor to Wikipedia but I will edit the Portuguese translation of the Harriet name as America is obviously wrong. The correct is Henriqueta, the feminine of Henrique.(189.56.35.98 (talk) 16:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Portuguese version is wrong
Talk:Haruka

message: An edit was summarized
: It shouldn't be moved to given name page. Given name Haruka can have various meanings. But generally haruka means 'distant' or 'long ago' so it should stay here.
and restored the text
:  is a Japanese word meaning .  
Dabs do not provide information, nor distinguish meanings of words that we have no articles for. The multiple meanings of haruka may, or not, add to the value of various articles that the accompanying Dab page links to, but the information about a meaning or multiple meanings belongs in articles only, and may not appear on this Dab. See Dab and MoSDab as needed.--Jerzy•t 17:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Dabs do
Talk:Canadian motion picture rating system

message: I've found indications that an "F" rating was used at one time in Canada in the 1970s, but it isn't listed in the article, perhaps because it has been superseded or dropped.  Perhaps someone more familiar with the history of the ratings system could add early ratings such as this with a word of explanation of when and why they were changed or dropped. — QuicksilverT @ 22:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superseded ratings 

message: Twice now,  has removed a citation to the British Columbia Film Classification Office, and replaced it with sub-standard references. On the first occasion it was replaced with a citation to IMDB which despite not being a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB didn't even corroborate the claim in the article. On the second occasion the citation was replaced by a source of dubious quality. Neither of these are of comparable quality to the BC Film Classification Office and I do not really understand why the editor is pursuing this. We have a high quality source in place and there is no reason to replace it. These edits are the only edits made by the editor and seem motivated by the determination to remove a link to the BCFCO rather than improving the article in any discernible way. Betty Logan (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPA removing a citation to British Columbia's Film Classification office
Talk:Koh Sotin district

message: *http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=29&art_id=qw1100421541987B251
*http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2004/11/15/2003211164
*http://www.phnompenhpost.com/index.php/2009011223590/National-news/Bomb-plot-mastermind-faces-court-today-police.html
Paxse (talk) 18:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for expansion... 
Talk:Kaoh Thum District

message: ធំ is Thom, not Thum. The district should be Kaoh Thom or Koh Thom. --Mrfly911 (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should change page name to Koh Thom 
Talk:Kong River

message: What is the Vietnamese name? Badagnani (talk) 03:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sekong River or sông Sekong (sông Xê Kông), I guess. Sekong is the unique river that origins in Vietnam and flows through Southern Laos and Cambodia.--Bình Giang (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnamese name?
Talk:Dina Araz

message: This article is nothing but a plot summary with no discussion of Araz herself and she has limited importance at best in the wider 24 universe. Merge. asyndeton 13:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Stroudwater Navigation

message: * Suitably referenced, with inline citations
* Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
* Defined structure, with adequate lead
* Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
* Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
* Appropriately understandable
I have assessed this article against these criteria, and am rating it B. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The Cotswold Canals website(s) all appear to say that stage 1a of the restoration is from The Ocean, at Stonehouse to Brimscombe Port. Wikipedia says from "Stonebridge", a mystery. The Ocean seems to be a pond, to the east of the railway bridge, called "Ocean Railway bridge" in at least one place, and not made of stone. The first bridge within stage 1a is called "Ocean bridge", and is a metal swing bridge -- if it is currently fixed, it might be concrete. There is no name "Stonebridge" on the OS map, and all references to it on the web look as though they may have been copied from a single source. So I suggest it should be removed, and changed to "The Ocean", Stonehouse.
Imaginatorium (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this "Stonebridge"?

message: Saul junction is mentioned several times in the article, but is not shown on the route map. (Indeed, it is quite difficult following some of the prose about the route and restoration against the map, as the locations are not always obvious.)
Could someone adjust the route map please? (I don't feel qualified to do so myself.)
EdJogg (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I added "Saul Junction" in parenthesis. If this is not the Absolutely Best Preferred format, someone will adjust it later. A quick search suggests that in many cases the junction name is written on the opposite side from the crossing waterway name, but this map has everything on the right. Imaginatorium (talk) 14:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I wasn't sure what to do for this one. (Someone else will certainly fix it if it's wrong.) I have tweaked the template for the Thames and Severn Canal slightly, as that was within my previous experience with these things. And my accompanying text changes are now making another reference to Saul Junction, so your edit is timely! -- EdJogg (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saul Junction?
Talk:Vanguard Automotive Group

message: The actual company name (as incorporated) is Vanguard Car Rental, Inc. Vanguard Car Rental, Inc. IN fact if you go to the web-site http://www.vanguardcar.com it still is Vanguard Car Rental Inc. 
The Vanguard Fleet (National/Alamo) (About 400,000 vehicles at the time it was purchased by Enterprise Car Rental) was made up primarily of leased GM Vehicles (about 60% or more) with leased Chrysler vehicles accounting for about 15% and leased Ford vehicles about 5% with other manufacturers leased and purchased (RISK) accounting for the remainder of the fleet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.189.78.249 (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is filled with errors and inaccuracies.
Talk:Mr. Monk, Private Eye

message: I'm going to attempt to Wikify this article using the same format as in the other episodes (with the episode template and the same divisions of information, exc.), so this page will be undergoing some major changes. Kochdude388 16:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, the major editing's done (it was actually done a while ago - I got caught up in something and couldn't post here), so if you have any problems feel free to leave one on my Talk Page. Kochdude388 18:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check/Opentasks

message: Hi folks - we recently failed a FAN for this article, and one of the main complaints was that it apparently needs a good review of citations. If you could spare some time to go over the article for us and give us the OK, it'd be much appreciated! Colds7ream (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Assistance with [[International Space Station]] 

message: Checking the English traduction of ITEM it should be important to take account in English the sense of this word in Spanish. We in Spanish speak about TOPIC as an item of a discussion or retorics generally about there is not any fiable empirical or dialectic probatory so to include this item in the discussion generally inducts to limit the depth or fiability of the discussion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.248.43.71 (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  topic 

message: I have a question about the pyramids I'm hoping someone can help answer. Obviousley there are different theories on how they were construsted, one involving the cutting of giant stones using brass tools and then dregging the stones across the land, up ramps on rollers with cattle like animals... I think it could be much more simple, could they have made the bricks/stone and set them up there as it would have been much easier to get all of the materials to where they needed, opposed to carting huge stones. Similar to the greeks and chinese.. Please let me know if this can be disproven  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.18.134 (talk) 04:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyramids 

message: Here there is a section talking about somthing that hasn't happened yet as it is scheduled for about 2 weeks time. Can someone sort this out? TF { Contribs }  19:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Foresight or incorrect date
Talk:Fred Hiltz

message: I would think that the point of having to have a source is so that we wouldn't have to keep saying "reportedly".  The source itself does not have the word "reportedly".  In fact the quotation, which should be citing his exact words, says "My initial reaction was one of dismay".  So I think we can remove the word "reportedly". --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "reportedly dismayed" 
Talk:Sandy Archibald

message: Data received at OTRS2013090310010513 - from relative. Scans of documents showing the correct dates and place of birth and death. Who ever found the original dates mistook another Alexander Archibald born in September 1897 in Aberdour.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and Death dates and places.
Talk:Heraldic flag

message: I have added a medieval English standard.  We could use images of the other heraldic flags. - PKM 21:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: The article currently is very Scottish orientated - which is quite understandable because the use of heraldic flags in Scotland is well documented.  In English heraldry the only regulation as such applies to the Banner – all armigers are automatically entitles to one – and the Standard – only those armigers granted a Badge by the College of Arms may use one.  Should this difference of approach/regulation be included in existing paragraphs or under a separate sub-heading?  I favour the latter. --Heraldic (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English Heraldic Flags

message: A heraldic flag may have the form of a "standard". But a "standard" may or may not be a flag. "standards" are not a flag sub-category. For example see Osprey "roman standards" 2012. Therefore the confusion should be removed. Both in the definition and the chapter "standard". Also, Vexilloid "standard" should not link to heraldic flags.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkis0 (talk • contribs) 10:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Standards

message: Standards had an important role in the iconography of Uruk and Egypt. When did they arise, how did they evolve? 2A04:4540:AA00:EB00:A90C:3414:9E6F:7326 (talk) 11:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing history section 

message: Redirecting from "Standard (emblem)" to heraldic flag is inappropriate, since standards are different kinds of carried or stationary symbols 2A04:4540:AA00:EB00:A90C:3414:9E6F:7326 (talk) 11:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate redirect 

message: Flag 2A00:F41:1C22:AFA3:997A:73E:613D:AB01 (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  British
Talk:Valentin Pikul

message: What is the point of all those links for books that will never have their own entries?  I hate to delete them, because somebody put a lot of work into them, but... Languagehat (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links 

message: I'd like to stress that an article about a writer should point out his writing skills, not ideology he followed. While many things here are true, there's simply no room for author's creativity. Every soviet writer had to follow the ideologic standards or else face oblivion or even prosecution. Yet Valentin Pikul is renowned for his distinct 'living history' style portraying personalities in light and picturesque manner. While being a pseudo-history in fact, it gives him a good background to work with. You won't blame other writers for their alternative history touch or little inaccuracies while portraying real people. This is fiction after all, a solid, high quality fiction.
Also 2/3 of the article are about the WW2-setting book. This is not representative as Pikul has been deeply exploring various eras.
P.S.: I hate soviet misinterpratations of historical events, yet I love well-written books - and that's where it counts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.255.141.240 (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emphasize
Talk:2007 Wimbledon Championships – Mixed doubles

message: Pavel Vizner and Kveta Peschke are in bold — meaning, apparently, that they are still in the competition — but their names are nowhere to be found on the rest of the page. How come? Scolaire 16:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now. Thanks AISept8. Scolaire 07:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pavel Vizner / Kveta Peschke
Talk:Crime After Crime

message: Actually, I wrote the whole thing as I remember it. --Gert7 16:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)