lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cricket test

message: :Fourteen years later the problem, if there was one, is thought to have disappeared. According to the Office for National Statistics in January 2004, "Four out of every five people from the black Caribbean community living in Britain described their national identity as British, English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish. Three-quarters of the Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities identified them selves in the same way."
Whatever one thinks of the 'cricket test', this last paragraph simply isn't true. The loyalties of immigrants and their descendents have been big news in the United Kingdom recently. I would like to remove it. Oswax 20:57, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 'Tebbit has made a number of other controversial public statements that seem to leave no doubt on his overall uncompromising attitude to those of differing ethnic and religious backgrounds'
Sounds a bit POV  to me  Francium12  23:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I'm giving it a make-over accordingly. This is not the place to argue about multiculturalism. The article should restrict itself to the expression and its impact not argue whether Tebbit was right or label him a racist (whether he is or not).GordyB (talk) 21:42, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Brooks Laich

message: — JIP | Talk 21:04, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Just wanted to let people know that I'm going to take the time to actually rewrite and clean up this article.  I know that people from the Official Washington Capitals Message board think it is funny to list the a bunch of the "Brooks Laich Facts" on the wiki page, but I think it takes away from what wiki is all about.  Please feel free to add anything you wish to the article, but let's keep it professional. -- Quaternions (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Clean Up

message: What's up with this "rhymes with" explanation after the IPA pronunciation?  There is absolutely no reason for this to be here.  69.244.64.30 (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation
Talk:Cotton Mouth

message: Umm shouldn't this article be merged with Xerostomia? It seems completely illogical to have two articles that talk about the exact same thing.
:Yes. And it is done. As there is a candy called cotton mouth I will also add a disambiguation page. Though, "cotton mouth" will first directly link to Xerostomia since that is likely what people would want. Superclear 22:24, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Regeneration (biology)

message: The table of contents reveals a heavy emphasis on regeneration in humans, obviously for medical reasons rather than the biological interest in the rest of the article. Given the different levels of treatment and emphasis, I propose to replace the human section with a short summary in keeping with the sections on other animals, and to create a new article on Regeneration in humans from the material here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Given the lack of response and what seems a clear enough case, I have boldly made the split. Help welcomed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue coverage of humans: propose split
Talk:Procurement

message: — Assignment last updated by PeaceProsperityDemocracy (talk) 13:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

message: Does the "selection in planning" process really exist? I have never heard of it, it is labelled as original research in this article and there are no citations in the article on this topic. Discuss at the "Selection in planning" talk page. BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selection in planning
Talk:Ethyl acetoacetate

message: Wimvandorst, you've made me laugh.  ^_^  ‣ᓛᖁ[ ᑐ] 22:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentences 
Talk:Charles Kingsmill

message: I'm not sure about this one.  This isn't the same Grindstone Island that already has an article but I'm not sure about having an external link in the main body of the article.  Also the link in question seems like a bit of an ad.  Any thoughts?  Cjrother 21:45, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grindstone Island 

message: The article mentions "Kingsmill House", but it currently doesn't say where that is or any further info about it.  The "Legacy" section could use these details as well as a citation or two.  Regards, PKT(alk) 13:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingsmill House
Talk:Bokosuka Wars

message: sorry I dont realy know how to put an image up, could someone tell Me how to?
:The picture tutorial is probably the best way learn how. -- Heptite 16:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Jersey

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Seton Hall reports#Requested move 28 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Seton Hall reports#Requested move 28 March 2024]] 

message: I just created an article for the Riverton development- a major real estate project on the mouth of the Raritan River. Any help with sourcing would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Riverton development
Talk:Utrecht University

message: According to http://www.uu.nl/uupublish/homeuu/faculteiten/188main.html, the departments of Theology, Arts and Philosophy are not called faculties.  It's a recent change though, so it hasn't been corrected on the deparment homepages yet (see e.g. the homepages uf the departments of Pharmacology or physics, which are also still called "facInsert non-formatted text hereulteit", even though they are definitely deparmtents now).  This article from the Ublad explains more: http://www.ublad.uu.nl/WebObjects/UOL.woa/3/wa/Nieuws/archief?id=1021917.  So, it should be the "department" of Theology, Arts and Philosophy, but "schools" would also be allowed. ....Baszoetekouw 22:06, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe Mark Overmars and his program Game Maker (www.gamemaker.nl) should be mentioned on this page? Just a thought. --Anonymous, 8/18/2006
: I don't think he should be. As far as I can tell, he's one of this university's many scholars, and looking through his article we have about him, I don't think he stands out as much as many of the others on this list. He has obviously achieved a lot, and being head of a centre like he is isn't to be ignored, but in terms of being a notable and distinguished scholar, like Nobel prize laureates in that list?  --JoanneB 20:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Maker 

message: department of lettuce? really?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.151.168.68 (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  lettuce 

message: According to the coordinates on the top of this page, Utrecht University has just moved from Rome (this revision) to Rotterdam (this revision). Both addresses are (obviously :-) ) incorrect. Utrecht University is located in Uithof, a campus immediately to the east of the city Utrecht. I don't know how to correct the coordinates myself, though. The correct address is Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS in Utrecht. Please help. Thanks. Mark in wiki (talk) 06:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates incorrect 

message: I removed the undergraduate count. The cited source does not list the number of undergraduates, only the number of first-year bachelor students, and this was incorrectly interpreted as the number of undergraduates. If someone can find the correct number they should add it to the template. Joopie99 (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undergraduate Count 

message: The motto seems to differ from the Infobox and the introduction. The University's Website from 2016 (and at time of writing) states it as May the Sun of Righteousness Enlighten Us. Spijker546 (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto
Talk:Neolamprologus brichardi

message: In the article it says that the fish are "extremely territorial" and "other adults remain outside the breeding area". Later on it says they "school in large numbers". These can't both be right. My assumption must be that wild fish are schooling animals except when spawning, but in the confines of the aquarium they are territorial and aggressive the rest of the time as well. If this is so, there needs to be a clear demarcation here between normal behaviour and aquarium behaviour. These are not always identical! Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 12:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed all the unreferenced claims and replaced the article with a referenced stub. MidgleyDJ 13:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  In both the aquarium and in the wild family groups (spawning pair plus many juviniles) are territorial.  In the wild the many families can have territories very close together, forming something like a school, but each family still guards its own small territory.Rlendog (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

text: For those who are also confused by the dichotomy of a territorial schooling fish, these animals have varying behaviours depending on whether at the nesting site or foraging. When away from the nest, these animals inhabit open water areas in sociable groups, searching for food. When they return to their individual breeding or nest sites, the individuals will exhibit strong territorial behaviour over a relatively small radius around the nest site. This permits multiple pairs to nest within a modest area without territories overlapping, and still allows for groups of individuals to associate peacefully outside of their immediate localised territorial ranges. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:31CF:B7FD:C84E:BEF7 (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social behaviour 

message: I believe the statement made by the author regarding the "territorial" nature of this species, is in regard to its behavior towards other species. That is why they can school (with each other), but also be very aggressive (towards others). From what I know of this species this is their nature in the wild, as well as in the home aquarium. I cannot at the time prove my theory, but I will attempt to do so. I plan on contacting the author of an article regarding brichardi (noted below) to clarify some of his statements, assuming I get a response I will update you.
The original reason I commented was because there is a "citation needed" on the page, and I think the original source was an article written on Cichlid-forum.com. I just started contributing, so I am not sure if I should just add the citation, or if I need to do anything to verify that the author IS indeed the original source. Here is the citation in MLA format... that is what I am familiar with. Harrington, Brett. "Neolamprologus Brichardi." Cichlid-Forum.com. Aquaworks Web Solutions, LLC, n.d. Web. 15 May 2014. <http://www.cichlid-forum.com/articles/n_brichardi.php>.
--DTVillanova (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In response to the above
Talk:Russell Mael

message: Does anyone know his date of birth? Read some where that he was 18 when Kimono My House was recorded
:Full birth details are now included on the article page.
:Derek R Bullamore 13:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The "1948" date seems dubious, if Ron is his older brother... Since if the birth date listed for Ron (Aug. 12, 1948) is correct, it must have been quite unpleasant for their mother. I don't think she carried both children for up to 7 months, then gave birth to Ron while still pregnant with Russell for two more months. (Although that situation would make an interesting Sparks lyric.) 2fs (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does that mean ?  -- Beardo 03:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic in their influential style and artistic vision
Talk:Gerald L'Ecuyer

message: IMDB has the e in Gerald accent-aigued, but either that's wrong or I guess he's dropped the diacritic, at least in English? Anyway, I've created Gérald L'Ecuyer as a redirect (and moved the pre-disambig I'd added to Gerard Lecuyer, which is where Gerald Lecuyer redirects. (CJCurrie created this relationship, so it must be sensible...) Samaritan 22:30, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: C'est moi, Gérald

message: I have removed the date of birth as unsourced trivia of no obvious value but some potential harm, due to privacy concerns. Please do not reinsert it. The year remains, that is fine. Guy (Help!) 13:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: This article doesn't have an infobox.  
I recently encountered a handful of contributors who very aggressively claimed that placing an infobox on a BLP article required talk page consensus.  If no one responds, after a reasonable period of time, I will place one here.  Geo Swan (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I object. And please note that the ArbCom sanctions (about which you were warned three weeks ago) states that insults and personal attacks, soapboxing and casting aspersions are ... unacceptable. You post, bearing examples of that (as well as being untruthful), breaches those restrictions. – SchroCat (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox
Talk:Kenneth Thomson, 2nd Baron Thomson of Fleet

message: Do we really need to have the business history in paragraph 4? I don't see how that's really relevant to Ken Thomson, even if the acts were done while he was running the business. It should be merged into Thomson Corporation, and the remainder of the paragraph merged into the rest of this article. --coldacid 22:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ken Thomson vs [[Thomson Corporation]]

message: The article says:
:In order to ensure that at least some of the work of important Canadian artists remained in his native country, in 2002 he paid the highest price ever for a painting by a Canadian artist when he purchased Paul Kane's "Scene from the Northwest: Portrait of John Henry Lefroy."
This needs a citation. I have meanwhile found a confirmation that the painting was indeed bought by Ken Thomson, but the reason given strikes me as completely fabricated. Both the National Gallery of Canada and the Royal Ontario Museum have substantial holdings of Kane paintings, both oil canvases and field sketches. BTW, Thomson paid C$5,062,500 for that painting (see Paul Kane). Lupo 11:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  That Paul Kane painting 

message: Is he a Canadian citizen? Or did he renounced his Canadian citizenship, like Black, to become a Lord?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.254.171.194 (talk) 17:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: Roy was born in Toronto, however...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.146.176 (talk) 19:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The family moved from the United Kingdom to Canada when Roy Thomson was young." 

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Ken Thomson (footballer) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ken Thomson"
Talk:It's Me...Gerald

message: Fwiw, I would have looked for this at typing out each dot in the ellipsis, and/or with a space before Gerald, or at It's Me Gerald if I'd seen it that way in one of several other credible sources (IMDB, Director's Guild, Globe and Mail), or It's Me, Gerald if I was just out to make everything more complicated than it needs to be. *looks from side to side* ...I'll gladly do all the redirects, but is this definitely the canon form? Samaritan 22:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I went with what I saw on the Showcase "coming up at 9" promo. Mayhap not a reliable gauge given that I didn't stick around for the actual opening credits, I admit. Bearcat 10:33, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm just the Gerald L'Ecuyer pedant today
Talk:Travis Carter Enterprises

message: In case this team closes up in 2008 as it is rumored, what should we do with the name of the article? Keep it as is? Change to Haas-Carter or Travis Carter Motorsports? Other? --D-Day (talk) 21:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An IP editor has taken it upon his/herself to change the name within the article. Whether or not the name should be changed is up for discussion, but it is my opinion (and I do believe this is covered under WP:MOS) that the contents should be changed only if/when the article is moved to that name. A third opinion is welcome. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 04:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Third opinion on offer.  It doesn't look like there's much discussion here at all!  I'd encourage you to handle it however you see fit and see if there are any objections.  Cheers, Blippy (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi again - just in case I haven't been very clear with my previous comment, I think it would be quite reasonable for you to adjust the page to what you think is correct (revert the name change?).  If the other editor responds then perhaps you can discuss it further.  On the other hand, if you were seeking an opinion on whether the WP:MOS applies here, then perhaps you could chase up an admin active in that area for comment.  Cheers, Blippy (talk) 06:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:The Girl Who Slept Too Little

message: This article survived an afd on the 12th September 2005 see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girl Who Slept Too Little--Doc (?) 22:52, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the scene where officer Wiggum is listening to music naked in the cemetary, I could swear there wasn't fog covering his butt up on the original FOX airings. Also, when he's naked in the tree at the end, wasn't part of his butt-crack showing? Buzda (talk) 22:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship in the syndicated airings? 

message: According to the Simpsons official website this episode is called The girl who knew too little.
I think that is more likely as it sounds like a pun on the fith season episode, The boy who knew too much.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tk420 (talk • contribs) 09:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of episode? 

message: It doesn’t have that 204.111.113.40 (talk) 13:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor will it have that unless/until sources are provided to establish that that meme is considered in any way significant. DonIago (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There was a start of a meme in this episode it was Graggle Simpson
Talk:Otitis externa

message: re: alcohol + vinegar solution...
would white wine vinegar be ok to use?  i tried it and it worked great, but i don't know about using it long term without having a second opinion!
Tim.mac 13:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solutions 

message: Is it possible to quantify the disease as mild, moderate or severe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.211.255.70 (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mild, moderate or severe. 

message: This page contain a LOT of dry information.  Could someone add a picture or something?  Make it easier to read the whole page.  Yongke 18:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures? 

message: This article is getting clumpsy, would anyone clean it up a bit? --Esthaleida (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Damn right about the pain, this thing is killing me!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.229 (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pain

message: I think I got this because I bought a pair of rubber in-ear earphones, which fit very closely to the opening of the ear-canal. Would any one agree these are a risk factor? Should something about them be added? Malick78 (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I got it from wearing earbuds as well. 24.255.33.88 (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Earphones?

message: can some one tell how to differentiate between ( fungal and Bacterial ) infection ?? (with pictures if applicable).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.52.173.30 (talk) 03:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bacterial VS fungal 

message: Can I not look up a single medical condition on Wikipedia without being treated to a horrendous, atypical, worst-case-scenario picture at the top of the page? --Buddy13 (talk) 02:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? Really?! 
Talk:Flood (music producer)

message: Just a nitpick, but...shouldn't it be Mark Ellis (music producer)? The medium that music is on is continually changing (from records, to CDs, and now mp3s), so music producer would be more accurate and inclusive. Bennie Noakes 03:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Record/Music Producer?

message: Mark Ellis (record producer) → Flood (producer) — Commonly goes by the nickname "Flood"—not by his birth name. Article should be moved as per WP:NCP#Nick names, pen names, stage names, cognomens. "Producer" is a specific enough attribution, and "record producer" is unnecessary. —Dream out loud 00:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Flood is listed in the "Grammy award winners" category.  Someone should mention his award(s) in the article.  I'd do it but I don't know what he's won! 70.189.71.32 05:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammy winner

message: The comment about Flood working together with Sigur Rós needs to be updated. Sigur Rós' myspace page speaks of them coming together in New York, I believe this month.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JurgenBM (talk • contribs) 23:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sigur Rós

message: Both external links appear to be broken currently. Should they be removed?
--Hendrikxix (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I removed a paragraph for pseudonnym section because it said he was a "gentleman, and was not a quote. The paragraph also lacked sources. The rest of the section eeds to be looked at also.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.57.205 (talk) 01:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudonym section 

message: The reference to Mark being vocalist for Seven Hertz is incorrect.  Seven Hertz was a band formed while he was still in secondary school, and he was the rhythm guitarist.  I was at school with him and Dick Jones, who was the drummer, and Dick tells me the lead vocalist was Dave Rimmer.  Of course Dick's and my memories can't be cited as a source, but as it stands this is unsourced. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 08:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven Hertz
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Spangel

message: KEEP - Spangel is a legitimate term used to name a specific relationship between two ficional characters within a popular fandom. There are numerous web sites and lj's dedicated to the fan fiction written exclusively about the intimate relationship between vampires Spike and Angel. This relationship has been referenced by the creator of the characters, Joss Whedon, in both print interviews and "Angel" season 5 DVD commentaries, as well as writers and co-producers of the show. It was made 'cannon' in the episode "Power Play". Anindoorkitty 23:30, 21 September 2005 (UTC)