lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Universal Music Distribution

message: This article seems a bit extraneous.  I say that a section for it should simply be noted on the Universal Music Group article.  —The Real One Returns 18:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's enough reason for the UMD article to remain outside the UMG article. The business operates pretty much autonomously of the main UMG company; there's also scope for the article to be expanded to discuss its corporate history and subsequent amalgamations or mergers. I vote to keep as is. Christopher (talk) 18:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Fitch

message: merge John Fitch here, as separately there are people each disambig page may miss. Chris 22:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge discussion

message: merge, same rationale. Chris 04:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Fitch merge

message: I moved the talkpage because "Chris the speller" was too lazy to when he crudely and clumsily split the article. Chris 07:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Chris the speller]]

message: I propose to merge the two articles, which were unnecessarily split from each other without discussion. Chris (クリス) (talk) 02:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:Acid Loops

message: The article is not clear about which programs can create new ACID loops, and which ones only use them. Could someone who knows more about this than I do add this information? --macrakis (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Creating and Using Acid Loops

message: I just merged this page into another one as suggested. Zakawer (talk) 19:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Capella (notation program)

message: I have expanded the article substantially. My sources have been: the German language article on Capella, the Capella website, the programming manual, and -- re the protestand hymnal -- the forum of the MFchi software which is used for navigation on the "Evangelisches Gesangbuch" CD. And some others. References in the form of <ref>-statements will come, but not today. Other editors should not by shy to provide such references themselves, before I can do it. BTW, I am a Capalla user myself. I am not happy with the formulation "win market-share", but can't produce a bether one, for the moment. I also do not have hard figures representing the market for music notation software. Cheers, L.Willms (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and references
Talk:Guitar Rig

message: Hi Everyone. Quick explanation: The reason companies typically don't publish lists of the hardware they emulate in software is that they would have to strike a deal with every copyright holder in order to be able to use the original brand name and model name in their software or its documentation. Listing the names of said brands and models on a Wikipedia page however is not conflicting with copyright in any way.
This also explains why there is no "official" source to back up the information given in the list - however, there are plenty of clues in the component naming and the sound characteristics of the modeled devices to safely deduct what guitarists and producers need to know. This is certainly "verifiable" information, the verification just requires the right set of musical background knowledge, and some time. You probably won't find this published in print anywhere, which is precisely why this article used to be so valuable.
I would strongly vote for restoring the list as I don't see any benefit in removing helpful information that contributors have collaboratively collected here over the different versions of Guitar Rig. And I would like to see a much more constructive approach by other editors if there are reasonable doubts about the content. Just removing it all is certainly not the way to go. --FlixFlux (talk) 21:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You probably won't find this published in print anywhere. Really??  Aside from it not being WP:VERIFIABLE and violating WP:OR and WP:NOTMANUAL what could be wrong with including it - if it's not a copyvio?  Toddst1 (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Component List Situation

message: I know I'm not the only person who was using this page for the list of components, since this little exchange occured, so here it is:
:This list doesn't violate any copyrights, one user merely suggested that maybe that's the reason Native Instruments never officially published the list. 
:"Share material: The talk page can be used to "park" material removed from the article due to verification or other concerns, while references are sought or concerns discussed. New material can be prepared on the talk page until it is ready to be put into the article; this is an especially good idea if the new material (or topic as a whole) is controversial." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#How_to_use_article_talk_pages). 
:According to this, this is a perfectly reasonable place for the list, no? I've gone ahead and reformatted it so it doesn't destroy the talk page. Darkwiz787 (talk) 23:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: [[probably copyright violation removed by The Dissident Aggressor 00:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, probable copyright violations can't be put on the talk page either.  See above.  The Dissident Aggressor 00:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Components
Talk:(Hey You) The Rock Steady Crew

message: Note to self interview from 2017 https://youtu .be/lR1RziH_6WM —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: interview with baby love
Talk:Targhee sheep

message: A better photo of this breed of sheep is requested. Zell Faze (talk) 04:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: The link on "domestic sheep" in the 1st sentence redirects to the article on sheep. I still don't know what "domestic sheep" are. I am assuming that it's a given name rather than a description since "domestic" translates into something different in each country. I request that someone who knows what "domestic sheep" are either clarifies in this article or (preferably) writes a new article to replace the redirect. Please? --Madame (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domestic sheep
Talk:IHOS Music Theatre and Opera

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://ihosopera.com/about_history.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 11:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Charleston (1923 song)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: The rhythm shown in the infobox is misleading. A dotted quarter by itself as shown might belong to any of a number of rhythms and doesn't convey the characteristic syncopation of The Charleston. The correct rhythm is shown in the infobox for the article Charleston (dance). It consists of a dotted quarter followed by another dotted quarter (or an eighth tied to a quarter) which should be accented, then a final quarter note or rest; alternatively, a dotted quarter + a quarter + an eighth + a quarter, which gives the characteristic swung feel to the piece. I have checked this against a piano-roll recording of the composer playing the piece:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AXVHeOj8cc. A RS would be preferable of course to trusting my ear ;-), but perhaps the sample in Charleston (dance) could just be cloned here. Additionally, if the YouTube performance cited above (or a similar one) could be put into Commons and linked here, it would improve the article; the original performance is certainly public domain, but I don't know whether the YT video is, there is no obvious notice. I don't have the technical facility to do these things, so I hope someone else can! --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 09:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhythm
Talk:Shropshire sheep

message: The article states that Samuel Sutton brought a flock to Maryland in 1860. According to his article the linked Samuel Sutton died back in 1832.
So: Either one of the two dates is false, or these are two different Samuel Suttons?! // Martin Kraft (talk) 12:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The wrong [[Samuel Sutton]]?
Talk:Coulter's Candy

message: The final verse has a variant ending, well-attested in the East End of Glasgow, which reiterates the falderol from the opening of the song, and returns to the meta-subject of being the pace-setter in a ball-tossing game.
If ye jump, ye're sure tae fa',
Ally bally, ally bally, who's got the ba'?
Nuttyskin (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Ending
Talk:Dashing Away with the Smoothing Iron

message: The song is not about "a housewife carrying out her linen chores"! It is about the narrator's sweetheart - not wife. As a song about the narrator watching his sweetheart, it is a love song.203.184.41.226 (talk) 08:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. And she's probably a maidservant. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject 
Talk:Wooley v. Maynard

message: Thought it was a good idea to prosecute in the first place?  Rich Farmbrough, 10:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Who

message: Could someone with the requisite resources, time, and ambition please add discussion of White' "in part" assent and dissent?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.43.60.50 (talk) 21:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: In Part
Talk:Altered State (band)

message: I came to this page expecting it to be about Altered States, the 1980s UK post-punk band:  http://www.terrorizer.com/dominion/dead-souls/band-of-the-week-altered-states/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.18.242 (talk) 14:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

message: Taylor was also the drummer for the band in 1992-3. 2600:6C44:6E00:178B:5135:656C:77D3:4DDE (talk) 08:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taylor Hawkins
Talk:Fourth Time Around

message: this article is a repeat; there is already an article for the song titled "4th Time Around", and this article needs to be deleted. Glassbreaker5791 (talk) 04:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Redirected to 4th Time Around.     Weasel Fetlocks (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  repeat!
Talk:Fuck the Pain Away

message: Was it an intentional or unintentional lyric error with the IUD/SIS bit in the song? She says SIS/IUD in the first line (which breaks the rhyme) but says IUD/SIS the next time which matches the rhyme ("SIS" and "best"). 
Did anyone ever read anything about this? Just curious. If there's something out there it should be part of the article. 50.129.12.139 (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: On purpose, of course.  Expect the unexpected from Peaches! 104.152.241.181 (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyric question
Talk:Citrus medica var. dulcis

message: I chose to clean up some of your grammar, punctuation, bolding, italics, etc. Makes it flow better.
Daniel Musto 07:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to the Author

message: I am changing this to a redirect.  This page has nothing on it that enables the citrus in question to be unambiguously identified, and much of the text is either a direct translation of the scientific name, or a reference to generic sweet lemons, with a hint that it might be a Med. limetta, based on an ambiguous source that probably isn't reliable anyhow (it looks like just a guess of the page compiler).  The formal name is universally attributed to Risso and Poiteau, Histoire naturelle des oranger (1818-1822), who predate the placement into Citrus medica, but do list a variety (p. 119) they call Malus limonia minor dulcis (the only appearance of dulcis in the book), for which they give the common name Limettier a Petit Fruit (als. Citrus Limetta Parva, Limetta a Frutto Picollo), all of which translate roughy as small or small-fruited limetta. They provide an illustration of a round fruit (so not Limia).  Based on there being other Limettier listed, this would be one of several varieties of limetta, but there is so little about this specific variety out there that a redirect to limetta is the way to go. Agricolae (talk) 18:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Heaven (Talking Heads song)

message: There's a stripped down female vocalist soul version of this song in an episode of Miami Vice - anyone know the artist?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.224.46 (talk) 17:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked into it, a more famous (and apparently only cover) is by Voxtrot. listen here. The voice is male though, so you might've been hearing a remix of it vs. cindi lauper. there's a page with that track, and other talking heads covers by notable artists here. I will also add a "covers" section to the article, listing Voxtrot, if you find out the female one, go ahead and add it. Nnnudibranch 03:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  covers 

message: It's been covered so many times and put onto so many best of albums that i don't get why it was deleted... it's not even a stub...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.134.226 (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep this aritcle up
Talk:Connor Temple

message: Why is it that there is only Series 2 character history? Can someone please add Series 1? ----- Cuddly Panda (talk · contribs) review me! |my chatroom] 01:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Series 1 history?
Talk:Holiday in Spain (song)

message: That's supposed to be a song page, yet, there's no author mentioned of the song itself!!  PLEASE, this is really sloppy, leaving no author- if it's a traditional song or the author is contested it should say so as well.  [shaking my head] --leahtwosaints (talk) 14:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote the song? 

message: The first sentence is somewhat misleading, as it claims ""Holiday in Spain" is a song performed by Counting Crows, together with Dutch pop-group Bløf." This is not true. The song was originally only recorded by Counting Crows, and it will probably still be known to many as a Counting Crows song, not a duet. I personally only found out about the duet after looking for the song on YouTube. I'll make a few alterations. Alan16 (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs re wording.
Talk:Conrad N. Hilton Foundation

message: I feel as if the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation is deserving of its own article, either with the Foundation's prize as a section of the Foundation article or with the Foundation's prize retaining this article while a new article is created for the Foundation.  Any thoughts? bluegreen 20:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Full disclosure--I work for the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation.  We're aware and respectful of Wikipedia's editing policies.  We do not want to self-promote our organization, but we would prefer for the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation and Conrad N. Hilton Humanitarian Prize to appear on separate, but linked pages, as bluegreen is proposing. We would greatly appreciate any feedback or advice from independent Wikipedia editors on how to proceed. Thanks. Cnhf (talk) 18:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split Foundation from Foundation's Prize Article
Talk:Just a Closer Walk with Thee

message: This section begins with the statement: 
The precise author of "A Closer Walk" was unknown until recently.
But it goes on to discuss origins without ever actually identifying this so-called "recently known" author. Could someone who has stewardship of this page please edit as necessary to correct this lack of closure?
Ed8r (talk) 14:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: In 1925, Bessie Smith recorded a song called "Careless Love." W.C. Handy was credited as the author. The tune is exactly the same as "Just a Closer Walk." When I was growing up in the 40s and 50s near New Orleans, "Careless Love" was called the theme song of Mardi Gras. Later, in the 60s, I heard that "Just a Closer Walk" had become the theme song of Mardi Gras. Since "Closer Walk" was not recorded until 1941, I have to wonder if there is some connection. The lyrics of "Careless Love" are somewhat risqué  as were a lot of the early blues songs. Thus, it is no surprise that"Closer Walk" got to be the theme rather than "Careless Love." 136.53.32.78 (talk) 00:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "Just A Closer Walk With Thee"
Talk:KS Lublinianka

message: *Wojskowy Klub Sportowy Lublin is not a defunct one. In 1923 it was renamed KS Lublinianka and as such it exists to the present day. You can find some info about it in the Polish Wikipedia: Lublinianka. You can thus merge this article with a... ummm... with a non-existent article about KS Lublinianka.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.87.63 (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Californians Against Waste

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...Californians Against Waste is an active environmental advocacy organization in California, and I am an employee there, and I am trying to edit this its wikipedia page. --Briano88 (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Corneille Ewango

message: Should a link to his TED talk be added to this page? --Opspin (talk) 14:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TED talk 
Talk:Non nobis

message: Could the status of this article now be reassessed in the light of fact that I have now completely rewritten it and added a number of references?
David Humphreys  —Preceding unsigned comment added by D Humphreys (talk • contribs) 11:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

message: is there an additonal Link / ref page that explains all the various counts of the Psalms and when the counting was done historically that can be added as information to the page? 
--Sternenfarben (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref Psalm 113 / 115 

message: In this section, an extract is quoted from the sixteenth-century typeset of Hall's 'Chronicle'.  Long-S is transposed into a modern for s, but for some reason some of the angular sixteenth-century vowel-V (the modern letter U) characters, and some of the curving sixteenth-century consonant-V (the modern letter V) characters, are transposed into modern-font V and modern-font U respectively.  If retaining the sixteenth-century spelling, using modern fonts, the text should surely read:
When the kyng had passed through the felde & saw neither resistence nor apparaunce of any Frenchmen savyng the dead corsses [corpses], he caused the retrayte to be blowen and brought al his armie together about, iiij [4]. of the clocke at after noone. And fyrst to geve thankes to almightie God gever & tributor of this glorious victory, he caused his prelates & chapelaines fyrst to sing this psalme In exitu Israel de Egipto, commaundyng every man to knele doune on the ground at this verse. Non nobis domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam, whiche is to say in Englishe, Not to us lord, not to us, but to thy name let the glory be geven: whiche done he caused Te deum with certeine anthemes to be song gevyng laudes and praisyngcs to God, and not boastyng nor braggyng of him selfe nor his humane power.
This version has been copied and pasted into the article (D Humphreys)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by D Humphreys (talk • contribs) 17:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later history
Talk:Now Thank We All Our God

message: The section Melody should be disclaimed as follows: "Below is the melody as it is attributed to Johann Crüger." The link that is provided not only is misleading, but false. The melody provided does not appear as such in the harmonization of Bach -- which is in a different clef all together -- for both vocal and instrumental setting. At the very least it is a transposition of the melody set by Bach; which would further confuse the reader. The melody that is provided within the article can be found in any and all hymnals both past and present (although in the key of F) -- plain and simple. The "harmonization" that Bach later set has nothing to do with the actual melody composed by Crüger; which is later explained in the section: Musical setting. Maineartists (talk) 02:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the three extant chorale harmonizations by Bach. Do you realize that a melody is still the same melody, even transposed, written in a different meter, and with little rhythmic variations? "Has nothing to do" seems plain wrong. I recognize it well in all three settings. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melody 

message: Now Thank We All Our God is the present article title. The lead begins "Now thank we all our God". I suggest to use none of these but move to "Nun danket alle Gott". The history of the writing of the hymn, the Leuthen story, and all settings with the exception of Rutter's depend on the German original. Most German hymns have German article titles in the English Wikipedia, see . Thoughts? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name? 

message: Is there a source about the hymns use for German national celebrations. I am German and never heard that, - but now I also don't take part much. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  German national celebrations
Talk:Churni River

message: The line drawing, :File:Very simlpe line drawing of the evolution of River Churni.jpg appears to have been copied from an article the International Journal of Current Research, here. I have removed the image and flagged it for general removal from Wikipedia. Please discuss if you think the image is not a copyvio. Finetooth (talk) 02:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Over (Portishead song)

message: I added the notability tag to the article. Two lines and no mention of the "many" actual movies it is alleged to have been in. But, I'll admit I'm ignorant of the song and defer to people who know more about it, which is why I didn't just delete... Tjvanwyk (talk) 02:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Rural Radio Network

message: http://www.fybush.com/site-020116.html 74.37.239.33 (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: good source