lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ray Gricar

message: "More likely, he walked away or committed suicide. The investigation is ongoing." 
Um, says who??128.172.27.181 (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conclusions 

message: I am removing the link to the "family site" for two reasons:
1.  It is a copy of the Wikipedia page, down to the photo.
2.  It is unclear if the family is still maintaining the site; their original contract ended in May or June of 2010.  The site had been down since late November 2009.  
If the family does claim the site again, it should be included.
J. J. in PA (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Site 

message: I took out the link to Brush Valley Township.  That is a small rural township in Indiana County, PA, about 70 miles southwest of Bellefonte.    It's on Route 56, north of Armagh.
The large valley north and east of of Centre Hall is known as Brush Valley; it is Centre County.  Route 192 runs through it.  As the police indicated on the television program Disappeared that a witness saw Mr. Gricar turning onto Route 192 at Centre Hall.  Rebersburg is located in the Brush Valley.  J. J. in PA (talk) 02:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brush Valley" is not Brush Valley Township 

message: I tried to add a reference to Gricar episode on the program Disappeared but I cannot get the tags to work.  The reference is here:  http://investigation.discovery.com/tv/disappeared/the-missing/ray-gricar.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by J. J. in PA (talk • contribs) 15:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disappeared

message: Gricar was an Assistant District Attorney in Centre County in 1981:  http://digitalnewspapers.libraries.psu.edu/Repository/getimage.dll?path=DCG/1981/04/28/14/Img/Pg014_120.png
Also the District Attorney prior to his election was Robert Mix:  http://digitalnewspapers.libraries.psu.edu/Default/Layout/Images/collegian/Elements/empty.gif
I'm correcting both.  J. J. in PA (talk) 05:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ADA

message: Should we place a mention in this wiki entry related to the Penn State sex abuse scandal given Gricar's involvement as Centre County DA at the time the initial investigation into sexual abuse allegations by former Penn State defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky. Gricar originally closed the case upon deciding that no criminal charges would be filed. This is all mentioned in the Grand Jury presentment of the Sandusky case, Gricar first mentioned on page 19.  (See Sandusky Grand Jury Presentment.)
: Yes ... but it looks like that information has already been added into the article.  Thanks.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal|Penn State sex abuse scandal]]
Talk:Reino Gikman

message: There are 14 references to Reino Gikman in the last 19 years in the Helsingin Sanomat archive. This search provides the list. Unhappily accessing the articles requires a subscription. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources: 14 references in Helsingin Sanomat 

message: While no source addresses this, I find it possible that the last name is a corruption of Hikman. There are existing cases where the G/H confusion can already be found (Helsingfors vs. Gelsingfors, Hatsina vs. Gattchina), so it does seem plausible. Of course I have no proof of this being the case. --Prospero One (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the name
Talk:Murder of Renee and Andrew MacRae

message: Why do the title and info box  both present only Renee as having disappeared? Surely they both disappeared equally. It seems very odd to only list Andrew as a relative of the victim in the info box of the article about his own disappearance. And it's strange to have both Andrew MacRae and Andrew Macrae redirect here but not even have him in the title. He can't be both important enough to override the names of other people's articles and not important enough to have (half) his own. Salopian (talk) 18:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Renee AND Andrew

message: The second paragraph under "Disappearance" touts this as "One of the most intensive searches ever mounted in Scotland" without any specific support for that claim (e.g. police manhours, acreage searched, etc).
Jaapstam33 (talk) 09:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support for "most intensive searches ever mounted"?
Talk:Choi Seung-hee

message: What does "rehabilitated" mean in the context of this article? Is this a mistranslation from Korean? Atkinson (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rehabilitated?" 

message: Not sure how to cite this source, since I read it through Google Translate, but the Hakone Maru was the ship she sailed on.http://www.whoim.kr/detail.php?number=66632&thread=58r02  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsilbe (talk • contribs) 13:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hakone Maaru" 

message: — Assignment last updated by Poppyprint (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Korean Visual Culture between Tradition and Contemporaneity
Talk:Thomas C. Latimore

message: I have added information regarding Capt. latimore's disappearance. My father, who was under Cdr. Latimore's command in 1941, told me that Capt. Tom's Naval Academy ring was later found on a dead Japanese soldier.  The assumption was that he had come upon a Japanese radio station in the mountains and was killed. -- User:Macbirch 04:04, 2 August 2009
:Removed your info as it is original research which is not allowed in Wikipedia.  But if your Dad's account is published in online somewhere or in print like a newspaper, magazine, etc then we can add it back in. -- Esemono (talk) 04:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: My daddy said
Talk:Gullah Jack

message: Was he an actual Gullah person? Badagnani (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heritage
Talk:Henry Bibb

message: Is this a misspelling? With either spelling, Google never heard of it. Any idea what it is called now?Paul, in Saudi (talk) 04:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cantalonia, Kentucky?

message: — Assignment last updated by Rivera.joel3 (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: African American Literature I
Talk:William Cutolo

message: Just removed the unverified (and most unlikely) claim that E&J Gallo was extorted by Cutolo. The info was added by a long disappeared editor with no user name in 2007. I also added important info about the Cutolo-Palermo-AG Siemens partnership in Russian cellphones, from the source cited. Tapered (talk) 05:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Information + Reconciliation
Talk:John Dunjee

message: Deleted the following link from the main article since that particular page is presently empty but am posting it here to easily save the information pending the Oklahoma website being updated in the future - http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/D/DU006.html Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture - Dunjee, John William. Shearonink (talk) 01:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sonny Osborne

message: On 17 January 2024,  repeatedly removed :Category:American patent holders and replaced it with :Category:American inventors, saying they were doing so .  I reverted them several times because replacing a subordinate and finer category with its broader next-level-up is the opposite of what Wikipedia:Categorization#Diffusing large categories says.  Many edits later, Smasongarrison explained that they were actually doing it IAW this discussion deprecating "patent holder" categories.  —  Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies for not realizing you'd reverted the change. I had assumed that it was one of the pages that didn't actually get moved after I got timed out for mass moving. I have hotcat set to link to WP:Diffuse, because that's typically what I'm doing with hotcat. I'm not sure what the purpose of your comment is, as I pretty quickly cleared up the issue once I realized what was actually happening. Mason (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  No worries!  I understand bots edit very quickly and can preclude catching the edit summary error until thousands of edits later.  I just left this summary here to explain to anyone looking at the history; our back-and-forth, with only summaries for explanation, might look like an edit war or an actual content disagreement, and I just wanted to clarify that wasn't the case.  —  Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: reversions explanation
Talk:Madison Hemings

message: As noted in the quote on the Monticello website, most historians do accept this - as shown in the content of the overwhelming majority of books published about Jefferson and that period in the last decade, and the awards, including the MacArthur Fellowship, given to Annette Gordon-Reed in 2010, for her work in changing Jeffersonian scholarship. This is not about individual editors' opinions, but following reliable sources (RS).Parkwells (talk) 17:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Most historians accept Jefferson's paternity
Talk:Nelson Hackett

message: The online biography of Sir Charles Bagot mentions that Bagot ordered Hacket extradited for his theft of goods beyond what was needed to escape to freedom, which legally exceeded what could be covered by the defense of necessity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.151.246.186 (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defense of Necessity and Extradition
Talk:Priscus (gladiator)

message: The first paragraph is good: a concise summary of Priscus's life that nails what seems to be the important points.
Beyond the first paragraph, well, all the other stuff shouldn't be here.  There are separate articles on Titus and gladiators for a reason; you do not need to summarize their importance here.  The article should focus solely on Priscus.  The rationale for context, importance of gladiators and Titus's dealings in his life should be interwoven into the text; the current set up is awkward and jarring to read
I suggest eliminating each of the sections, then expanding on the first paragraph to include (in abbreviated/summarized form) all of that removed information that directly relates to Priscus.  There's no real need for separate headings in this article, just go with a multiple paragraph format.  Finally, when your edits are done, get rid of the stub tag.
Also, cite with footnotes.  This is the preferred method of citation that Professor Strong wants us to use.  You can find a how-to guide here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes
199.74.101.136 02:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Rome Comments 

message: Good article, but many of the subjects discussed stray from the focus of the article, Priscus.  The first paragraph was good and focuses on Priscus.  I also liked the text of the poem included in the article, but is it possible to make a link to the text online?
I agree with sam that the sections about Titus and Gladiators are unecessary and should be removed, or somehow better integrated with the section about Priscus.  I understand that your only primary source is the poem which may be somewhat limited in information about Priscus, but when reading the article I found myself wondering what the article was really about, Priscus? or the poem itself?  Alot of this article seemed to be more like an analysis of the poem than a biography about Priscus.
You also dont need to mention, "The poem detailing Priscus and Verus' battle shows a few things." since it is already understood that the poem is your primary source of information.  I also agree that footnotes should be used here.  Other than that, good article.
Erikofferman 03:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More comments
Talk:Thomas Sims

message: Does anyone know if it is true or not that Sims, upon being returned to Georgia, was whipped until bleeding and then paraded through the streets of Savannah?Trucker11 (talk) 11:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ltz921, NoVAFanatic, and I will be working on this article/making changes from now until about the week before Thanksgiving.
Rippedjeans6 (talk) 13:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am finding in multiple sources that the arrest date is actually April 3, 1851 as opposed to April 4.
New England Quarterly - DOI: 10.2307/362803 page 197
The Journal of Negro History - DOI: 10.2307/2715559 page 44
Ltz921 (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrest Date

message: I have just added a chunk of new information I thought I had added beforehand, I must have forgotten to put it through earlier.  Most of the information just added pertains to the trial - I have gone over it before but assistance with proper Wikipedia sourcing/styling methods would be appreciated.
NoVAFanatic - Student at Northeastern! 14:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial information
Talk:The Homesteader

message: the way the plot is written out kind of doesnt make sense. Is it Agnes or Jean who doesnt know Agnes isnt white/ or doesnt know Jean isnt white? HUH!? and who is McCarthy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.162.118 (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Cooper Lee

message: please revert this to show the real Cooper Lee...   Fictional stuff is fictional
www.cooperlee.com
:Personally I'm not sure that subject of your link fulfills the notability guidelines for its own article on Wikipedia, which you should carefully study before writing an article about it. Regardless, if you want to create an article about a subject whose name already has an article, you should not blank the existing article, especially if it is more likely to be known than the new article. You should either move (using the move function not cut and paste) the existing article to a new location or, better, write the new article in a separate location and add a link to it in the existing article. However, I again stress that you should not write an article unless you are sure its subject is notable and this notability is shown by a number of independent sources. Will (aka Wimt) 00:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aaron Anderson (Medal of Honor)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV 05:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment

message: :This article does not qualify for B-class so I reassessed it to "C". It may have been bot promoted but fails the criteria of #1, 2, and 4. The content is largely supported by one source (Hanna, Charles W.) but other sources add confusion. Was the name a misspelling or an alias?  If the person continued to use the name and returned to Philadelphia it was an alias. Anderson is listed as the "true name" 
:The Freedom Foundation apparently still lists the name as "Sanderson", likely using the name from the MOH award. 
:The subject was buried in Lebanon Cemetery. Due to the closing of many area cemeteries (Lebanon in 1902), and the opening of Eden Cemetery in Collingdale, Pennsylvania, the subject was reinterred in Eden Cemetary in 1903. At least one site erroneously mentions "mass burials" (with a name misspelling) because these many reinterments took place around the same time. 
:The infobox has the place of birth in Rogers, Arkansas. The MOH lists the place of birth as North Carolina. The Congressional Medal of Honor Society also lists North Carolina. The content in the "Later life and death" section includes content (and source) that "Sanderson" was born in Virginia.  If Sanderson was a "misspelling" there should be records "somewhere" (Naval entrance etc...) to resolve the issue.
:There are some important facts that agree but I see enough confusion, contradiction, and surmising that this seems like a partial ancestry-search endeavor instead of a Wikipedia article let alone B-class. --  Otr500 (talk) 20:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues
Template talk:Yorkregionsecondaryschools

message: This template is not up-to-date for these reasons:
* First of all, there are 45 high schools in York Region who has a Wikipedia article, but some of these article links are NOT included in the template.
* Second of all, some high school links are deleted and/or moved (such as Emily Carr S.S.), leaving dead links behind, these dead links should be removed in order for the template to be up-to-date. 
Smcafirst (Talk) 00:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template is not up-to-dated
Talk:Allan Jackson

message: Allan Jackson bio at...
http://www.pugetsoundradio.com/forum/v-print/m-1209218144/
Correct spelling, as noted in this article, is "Allan" and not "Alan."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.47.2 (talk) 08:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alexander Aitkin

message: He died in about 1800. Ontario did not exist until 1867. We should not treat places as somehow inherent before thry exist. If we have no better Category he would probably best be placed directly in deaths from tuberculosis over a historically using a name for a place over 50 years before it existed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The location still existed, even if it goes by another name. Please understand that removing that category looses information, even if it doesn't match your overly narrowview of nationality. Mason (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Did not die in Ontario
Talk:Aaron E. Wasserman

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. —KGV 09:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Aatto Pietikäinen

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. —KGV 09:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Agustín Feced

message: I'd say there's a 90% chance he was dead by the end of 1989. There is no evidence of him being alive after 1988 in the article, except for the coffin lifts. I'd say his death date is most likely 1984-1989. 71.203.238.55 (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alan Gordon (songwriter)

message: There are attempts to turn this article into a memorial. Despite Alan Gordon's untimely recent demise, this is not the appropriate place for such edits. The present article sorely needs cited sources and  verifiablilty - not unsourced, grief ridden, POV entries;  however laudable they may be, and with all due respect to the departed. Please see What Wikipedia is not.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alvin J. Paris

message: I've been wondering for some time what happened to Paris and today I got the answer. This info isn't on a website to use as a source (other than Ancestry), but other editors should keep their eyes peeled for something. Paris was born in New York City, New York on 17th Oct 1918 as Alvin Jay Paris. He married a Norah Mae Gagnon King on 25th Apr 1950 in Orange County, California. She was born 4th Jul 1918 in Edmonton, Canada. Then they seemingly disappear... or not. Norah Gagnon PALEY died 8th Jan 1994 in San Joaquin, California and Alvin Jay PALEY died 11th Sep 2006, though his social security record doesn't state where. I guess the sensible thing to do after being involved in a very public scandal is to change your name and it seems they did just that. If anyone has an appropriate website on sports betting / American sport to host this information, we'd be able to put it on the page. Until then, Alvin Paris b. 1918 will be the extent of the bio details on the page. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 20:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris's fate
Talk:Dominion of Canada

message: This deserves its own separate page.
ArmchairVexillologistDon 00:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the redirect to Canada. The subject is better covered within the Canadian history pages, rather than by creating a potentially confusing "spin-off" article. --Ckatzchatspy 03:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Dominion of Canada

message: Commonwealth of Australia (1901)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia
Dominion of New Zealand (1907)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_of_New_Zealand
Dominion of Newfoundland (1907-1949)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_of_Newfoundland
Union of South Africa (1910-1961)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_of_South_Africa
Dominion of India (1947-1950)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_of_India
Dominion of Pakistan (1947-1956)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_of_Pakistan
ArmchairVexillologistDon 00:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Dominions within the British Empire-Commonwealth

message: Please assist I would like someone to add :Category:Unprintworthy redirects and :Category:Redirects from alternative names to this article. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . Also unprotected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit 

message: In my opinion, Dominion of Canada clearly should redirect to Canada, as the two terms are synonymous. User:Elevatorrailfan seems to feel that modern Canada is a successor state to the Dominion of Canada and that the transition happened in 1953. I do not believe that there is historical evidence for this. We have had this discussion before, and the consensus is that the country was never formally named "Dominion of Canada", nor was there ever a formal abolishment of the term dominion as a description of Canada; it has simply gradually gone out of use. Indefatigable (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where should this redirect? 

message: Since the Dominion of Canada redirects to Canada, I think this edit needs to be restored to this period. Canada became an independent state since 1982. The 1867-1982 period covered Canada which was still part of the United Kingdom. Wrestlingring (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC for Dominion of Canada 

message: *Strong oppose not even close to correct .--Moxy (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The proposing editor has retired so I think this can be closed. Flat Out (talk) 05:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Threaded discussion

message: Thought it might be good to make some mention of what happened to use of the term. Added this. --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention in [[History of Canada]]
Talk:Karl-Gustav Lagerfelt

message: KG Lagerfelt's title att that time,was Minister at the Swedish Legation in Tokyo. The title Minister, in this context, denotes the head of mission who is not a full Ambassador Plenipotentiary. Later the legation was upgraded to an embassy, and the emissary was titled Ambassador. It is possible however that he discharged certain consular functions as head of mission. The above facts are most readily checked in 'Statskalendern', the Swedish government's equivalent of "Whos's Who". --Johan Lagerfelt, son of Karl-Gustav. (194.14.166.249 (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the title
Talk:Bertil Carlsson (skier)

message: dates of birth and death added from sports-reference.com84.134.126.90 (talk) 21:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beverly St. John

message: Clergy???   Is Ms. St. John a member of the clergy? The Cumberland Presbyterian Church, as I understand it, has two classes of elders, "teaching elders" and "ruling elders."  Teaching elders (ministers) are clergy, but ruling elders (responsible for running the local church) are laymen.  A member of either class of elders can be elected Moderator of the General Assembly.  Can someone associated with this denomination clarify?  I don't want to edit if I am incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.241.73 (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled