Talk:Politics of Poland

message: Re: political parties
5% seems to be a much more natural choice, since (as you know) it is the minimal support needed to enter parliament. In fact the 3% threshold seems somewhat artificial and specially chosen for unia wolnosci, which currently enjoys the support of 3% + \epsilon of the population. I do think it is accurate to consider this party political plancton, as it doesn't even get mentioned by the mass media when voter preferences are disscused.
:P.S. ditto for SKL N.N. 04:49 8 mar. 2004 (UTC)
::No problem. The point is that just last Monday I saw Frasyniuk on TV in Forum program. But you for sure made me reconsider my point. Will fix it right now. BTW. Why don't you create an account?. It gives you more privacy. Przepla 16:16, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that we have clueless vandal here. User:Annygirl or User:Anna2004 apparently does not like the suffrage section and is inserting gibberish. One wonders when this user get bored with that. In the meantime, please be vigilant about this page.Przepla 15:27, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I've updated and reorganised the article so that it's a better read. I think that the current ordering of information is the most useful to a new reader, who is likely to be most interested in 1) what's been happening recently, and 2) what is the general political structure. The rewrite of what went on during 2000-2005 is largely from my own memory (while trying to keep what was written already). I suppose that what can still be remembered several years on should correlate with what was important... Deuar 22:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit 

message: "National Security" doesn't seem to fit in with this article... If we have that, we might as well add "social security", "foreign affairs", "internal affairs", "economics", etc. etc. 
It should rather be in an article devoted to foreign affairs rather than politics, IMHO. Deuar 22:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Security 

message: I'm not sure if Krzysztof Kononowicz should be in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Polish_politicians --84.234.60.154 (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kononowicz 

message: what happens if the president dies. is a new one elected or does the prime minister become president until teh next round of elections? also it says that the president appoints the prime minister yet donald tusk is of the opposing party and everywhere else it says that the party with the most votes gets to choose the prime minister. which way is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.223.62 (talk) 01:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leader 

message: I come from Poland, you don't know anything about the President of Poland! He has many competitions in the foreign politics! He is not only a representative person. It's not Germany.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.76.37.180 (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course the President of Poland is not merely ceremonial, a political veto can only be overridden a by 3/5 majority, this is a lie spread on Wikipedia by people with an English-centric view, who considered if the President is not both the head of state and head of government, and the Prime Minister appointment requires investiture unlike the French case, then is parliamentary, this also happened with Portugal. So I have got news for you, it's not. The same thing goes for Lithuania, Romania and Ukraine. — B.Lameira (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  President of Poland 

message: According to this Constitution, Poland is parliamentary state but not semi-presidential.--5.172.232.243 (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitution 

message: They are controversial because the consitution says it is a parliamentary republic but in fact it is a semi presidential republic.2404:8000:1027:85F6:109A:5AA:7E5E:48DA (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government system?