lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nag champa

message: Nag Champa or Nag champa? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Nag Champa, just like Dairy Milk and Mini Eggs. —SpacemanSpiff 03:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Strange examples! But, yes, in "Nag Champa", "Champa" is part of the name, and so should be capitalised. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 07:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Capital "C" it is then. thanks, SpacemanSpiff and Kautilya3. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Dairy Milk and Mini Eggs are trademarks owned by a single company. Isn't nag champa a generic fragrance made by multiple companies, in which case it would be all lowercase? Ibadibam (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In light of one year without further comments, I am moving this page to treat is as a common name, per MOS:CAPS. Ibadibam (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: Why is there no mention of Halmaddi resin, which is also often part of the ingredient list, sometimes instead of plumeria, sometimes alongside it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.238.39.119 (talk) 08:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is no longer used in the famous blue box recipe. Despite the Indian government introducing laws to protect halmaddi from being over-harvested, blackmarket thieves continued to pirate the resin without a licence, resulting in the unfortunate devastation of most of the trees. So the inventor Satyam Setty (of Shrinivas Sugandhalaya company) stopped using it and modified the recipe. Samsbetter (talk) 02:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halmaddi
Talk:Oogle

message: There is a website called "Dr. Oogle", so I don't think 'Oogle' searches should necessarily be redirected to 'Google'.
:Unless you're going to write a page on it, don't blank it. FCYTravis 12:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

message: How silly, an Oogle is a punk genre specific word for poseur. Many punk flyers often include the phrase "No Oogles!" or "No Nazis, No Oogles!" etc. xdevilockex (talk) 00:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Oogle isn't Google
Talk:Bamboo Among the Oaks

message: I removed what amounted to basically the table of contents. This does not fit in style with other articles about poetry anthologies nor does it really help to explain why this book matters. If someone feels like the names of the authors really need to be added - then something similar like the small list found on the Conductors_of_Chaos:_A_Poetry_Anthology article might be placed here. Please avoid promotional language and cite sources. Nposs 06:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing extra material

message: I think this anthology is notable because it was reviewed in the Journal of Asian Studies. These   say that the anthology was important in Hmong-American literature. There are also some Google Books hits . Bláthnaid 20:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing [[WP:PROD|PROD]]
Talk:Everything Playing

message: Sources vary as to whether this album was released in 1967 or 1968. It first appeared on the Billboard album charts the week of January 20, 1968, but an ad on the front page of Billboard's January 6, 1968 issue implied that it was available at the time of publication, indicating a possible December, 1967 release date. In other words, the September, 1967 release date is wrong, but I don't know what the correct date should be if I can't even pin down the correct year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hank236 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: Can anybody post the unit sales of the 1968 album, as compared with the unit sales of the 2003 version? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.177.27.19 (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit sales question
Talk:Pecuniary externality

message: This stub might be expanded by contrasting pecuniary externalities with technological externalities, a point made by some authors (e.g., Margolis & Liebowitz 1994) when critically discussing network externalities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.3.185 (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrast with technological externalities?
Talk:Dazu Huike

message: This article could use some Chinese characters for names, etc.
Thinman10 06:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Chinese characters 

message: Does anyone know what happened to the Marrow Cleansing Principle? Daily Rubbings 15:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost book 

message: WOMEN IN ZEN BUDDHISM: Chinese Bhiksunis in the Ch'an Tradition by Bhikshuni Heng Ch'ih
:"The first `bhiksuni` mentioned in the Ch'an literature was a disciple of the First Patriarch of of Chinese Ch'an Bodhidharma, known as Tsung-chih. The Ching-te chuan-teng lu tells us that before returning to India after many years of teaching in China, Bodhidharma asked his disciples to relate their realization of the Dharma.
    Tao-fu said, "I perceive that the Buddhist path is transcending language and words and yet not separating from language and words." Bodhidharma said, "You have attained my skin."
    The Bhiksuni Tsung-chih said, "What I comprehend is like joyfully seeing the `Aksobya's` Buddha-land." After seeing it once, you never see it again.
    "You have attained my flesh," said Bodhidharma. Tao-yu said, "The four elements are originally empty and the five aggregates are non-existent. Not even one thing of what I comprehend is attainable."
    "You have attained my bone," said Bodhidharma. Finally Hui-k'o made a bow to the teacher and stood aside in silence.
    Bodhidharma said, "You have attained my marrow."12
This is the story of how the Dharma was transmitted to the Second Patriarch Hui-k'o. Bhiksuni Tsung-chih was one of Bodhidharma's most advanced students. Although she was not the top disciple, the mere fact that she played a role in the scene of the Dharma-transmission is itself very significant. We might say this makes a good beginning for `bhiksunis` in the Ch'an tradition.
Can we insert it into the text of the mainpage somehow?
:Austerlitz -- 88.72.20.158 (talk) 14:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.72.20.158 (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some information 

message: I've reverted the story of Huike cutting off his arm to the earlier version to reflect more accurately Ferguson's story (as this is the citation). I must confess I've never read that Huike "screamed" when he cut off his arm. Also I find it difficult that someone would "realize" that he had cut his arm off. I think that if you cut off your arm, no "realization" is necessary! 
Anyway, that's why I've reverted to the previous edit. After all, this really is a legend. Let's not layer it with details. Thinman10 (talk) 06:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huike Cuts Off His Arm
Talk:Icons, Abstract Thee

message: This page is mostly fan speculation which doesn't conform to Wikipedia standards.  I would cut the original research out myself but that would leave the page empty and I think that would be worse. 70.187.190.211 (talk) 04:49, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed
Talk:Spessartine

message: As is the Mandarin garnet page does not contain much information different from the Spessartine page.  Also m. g. does not have any references other then those in the infobox.  I think the speculation should be removed the rest sourced and the entire page merged here.--Kevmin (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Don't need a separate article on a color variety. Vsmith (talk) 02:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mandarin garnet merge
Talk:The Power of One (TV series)

message: This article feels more like an ad for the show than informational.  What's with the exclamation points?  70.191.89.111 05:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

message: If anyone has any info that I have missed for this article please add it to this discussion page.
  RoSiN   06:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra Info 

message: I was just wondering after watching the show a few times I was wondering if it was all mocked up for the show? I just asked because I thought it was a well known fact that you cant make someone do something they don't want to do even under hypnosis. --MattyC3350 21:34, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, i think u r right. u cant make some1 do something they dont want even uder hipnosis (saw it on mythbusters lol). Maybe the people that were hipnotised were told to agreed to the suggestion. idk -.- its wierd, i dont believe it tho XNos 09:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it real?
Talk:LGBT marketing

message: I'm thinking of updating the sub-section of pink-washing, mainly just add the etymology of the term and the specific pink-washing practices. Any suggestions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nawaralshamsi (talk • contribs) 06:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi, guys! 

message: I'm planning to add examples of exploitation of LGBT consumers, such as targeting by alcohol companies. WritingCardinal (talk) 13:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Changes
Talk:Bobby pin

message: "and are quite appropriate for handling the still smokable remains of marijuana cigarettes"
I removed this comment as I felt it inappropriate for an encyclopedia.  Roaming27 07:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By what logic? — Omegatron 04:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bobby pins and marijuana

message: Perhaps it would be good to create a Kirby Grip article that redirected to Bobby Pin? Perhaps somebody will want to know what a Kirby Grip is, and will not think to look at the Bobby Pin in the search results. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.92.106.163 (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kirby grip? 

message: This article needs to be merged into Hairpin (fashion). 18:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Needed! 

message: The idea that the "bobby pin" was created by someone with the name "Robert Pinney" ("Bobby" short for "Robert", "Pin" short for "Pinney") seemed too much of a coincidence to believe.  I checked the sole reference on the page, and it led to a Facebook page - not necessarily a trustworthy source.  This particular one was created at right about the same time that the reference was added to the Wikipedia page.  On it, Robert Pinney posts little messages about his daily activities, and about bobby pins - quite a feat, since according to his biographical information he's been dead for over 90 years. Pinney is not shy about this, and discusses his afterlife in some detail.  Statements made by people long dead are of course commonly accepted on Wikipedia - but not, I think, those which are made posthumously.  Therefore, I am removing the Robert Pinney text.
However this does not mean that we can completely rule out Robert Pinney as a possible founder of the bobby pin; just that further research into his existence needs to be conducted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.141.207.57 (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Dlabtot (talk) 04:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Pinney?  

message: I am planning to add more on the history section. I have found this document that seems sufficient to supply with good information about a bobby pin. I also plan to expand the definition about a bobby pin, rather than the simple definition of it being "a type of hair pin".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicoleL-NJITWILL (talk • contribs) 20:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revising Bobby pin page
Talk:Third party (politics)

message: I added "innumerate" to the opening paragraph a few days ago.  It helps.    They not only compete against the duopoly, they are trying to abolish the anti-democratic 2-party system.  A small party NOT trying to abolish the 2-party system (if there are any that foolish) would still be a "non-duopoly party".  In most cases, however, no such categorization according to size is helpful.  It is added merely to gratuitously ridicule small parties.  "My daddy is bigger than your daddy!  Nyah, nyah, nyah!"  There is no democratic reason to ignore or discriminate against a party because it is small.  Let the voters choose instead according to quality.  Korky Day 07:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sad to report that it took until 11:43, 30 May 2008 for a colleague to remove "(innumerate)" from the article, correctly identifying it as an "editorial" on KD's part.--Jerzy•t 02:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party is discriminatory term 

message: *Person or entity not party to an agreement but with an interest in the agreement. 
* someone other than the principals who are involved in a transaction
* a political party organized in opposition to the major parties in a two-party system 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.7.55 (talk) 08:17, :18, & :20, 28 March 2009‎
:   Those links are to http://www.carabinshaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1230612.html and http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn respectively.   Third party is a dab page that may or not deal adequately with the two other meanings above, but this was not in any case the place to discuss it at any time in 2009, nor probably anytime since.--Jerzy•t 01:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party has been described as: 

message: Heard of Thrid party US called Lazziz faire(Cant say if I spelled it right!) Lets us be Like a Libertarian Party mores however!CraddockKin (talk) 03:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lazziz faire third party? 

message: In the lead section's 2nd 'graph (which concerns the UK specifically) i removed the third sent, which read
:  So it would follow that in different countries within the UK there are many different third parties.
   What appears after "that" may or not be true, but it does not follow from the two preceding sentences -- nor even from any collection of assertions in the article. Nor can i see any point in keeping track which major parties are 3rd parties in some jurisdiction (be it a country, or some much smaller constituency). If you think that 'graph deserves another sentence, please ask
# Is it likely that someone cares?
# If so, would an exhaustive table be more useful than a prose account?
--Jerzy•t 01:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tories as third party
Talk:The Lions of Al-Rassan

message: I changed the tentative release date from 2007 to 2008, since the imdb page for tLoaR now lists the upcoming date as 2008.  eveningscribe 07:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm eveningscribe, who are you?  First of all, assume good faith.  Second of all, there's no need at *all* to take that tone with anyone.  Sheesh.  Evening Scribe (talk) 04:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who am I?  Who are you?
Talk:La Blanquilla Island

message: I don't know spanish, but there's some info on this island in spanish Wikipedia... so if anybody could translate that (or part of it), it would be great :). I created an article about it but merely added its location... there's an airport there (SVLB - La Blanquilla Airport ), and it's part of Venezuela, that's all I know. Kindly expand this. --Unsound 07:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No info about this island... 

message: Why is it uninhabited? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uninhabited.
Talk:Rouyn-Noranda

message: move. 
Rename: Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec → Rouyn-Noranda
Per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE, this is a strictly unique name with no meaning unrelated to the city. Rouyn-Noranda already exists as a redirect to this article. As such, geographic disambiguation is unnecessary here. Note that this does not apply to the separate names "Rouyn" and "Noranda" ("Rouyn" is currently a redirect to this article, but should probably be reviewed, whereas "Noranda" is already a disambiguation page), but the combination of the two as a single hyphenated place name pertains uniquely to this city. Bearcat (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a valid reason to oppose a page move per Wikipedia's disambiguation policy. If the combined name isn't ambiguous in its own right, then it's not an ambiguous name whether the component parts would be ambiguous in separation or not. You'd do well to start applying WP:PRIMARYUSAGE as written instead of making up your own tendentious additions to it. Bearcat (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

text: It's not clear how the alleged ambiguity of the component parts of the town's name is relevant.  Nothing at WP:DAB suggests that we break titles into parts and assess the ambiguity of each component.  There would be absurd results if we did so (for example, we would need to disambiguate Toronto Maple Leafs, because the hockey team might not be the primary usage of terms relating to Canada's largest city, a type of tree and a part of the tree used for photosynthesis).  Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

text: This is in direct contradiction with WP:CANSTYLE. - DigitalC (talk) 23:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

text: That's never been true, as the largest cities were always at undisambiguated titles. And even to the extent that it was true, there was never any policy or convention that required it. Canadian geographical articles never had any actual naming convention at all until the consensus of WP:CWNB users adopted the current "undisambiguated whenever possible" convention — prior to that, there was only an untested assumption that our naming convention would match the US one word for word. Bearcat (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename page

message: Could anyone add the correct pronunciation of Rouyn-Noranda?--Joseph 11:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Holberg, British Columbia

message: If anyone has pictures of the area, it would be great. --Enigma (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The seventh (7) footnote leads to a suspicious website. I am not sure if I can just remove the footnote as it would leave the text unreferenced. Someone with knowledge about the correct workflow should remove the link. Cheers!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.90.84.136 (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unserious Footnotes
Talk:Anderton Boat Lift

message: I removed the following section from the main article, because it is unsourced and POV:
----
An interesting diversion is to consider how the appearance of the Anderton Lift relates to the concept of engineering elegance.
There is a way of thinking, probably misguided, that if something looks well, it probably is well.  However, the Anderton Lift has to look like one of the most inellegant engineered structures that one might ever encounter. The photographs cannot begin to suggest just how ugly an engineered structure this is; it becomes fully apparent only on first-hand observation. Its ugliness is an aspect of the structure that makes it even more remarkable.
This is not a detraction from its worth, nor a slur.  Indeed, it is something that may make the Anderton lift even more remarkable as a piece of mechanical and civil engineering.  It shows that it need not look well to work well!
----
If a third-party discussion of the appearance of the boat lift can be found, then a summary of the contents of this source, with citation, could be included. Without this, this is a statement of the contributor's point of view, and so is unencyclopaedic. Incidentally, the original boat lift, before the addition of the A-frames when it was converted to electric operation, looked much more elegant than it does today. Gandalf61 07:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An Engineering Icon?

message: The bulk of the article is ready to go forward as a GAC, but we need much more on the restoration. Mayalld 06:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: What year did the restoration start?  I notice that the article is internally inconsistent: 2000 and 2001 Springnuts (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What year did the restoration start?
Talk:Morning Musume discography

message: I started wondering about this when Bokura ga Ikiru MY ASIA came out. On the official artist list, Otome/Sakuragumi are being treated as separate artist groups. Should we be putting the Sakuragumi and Otomegumi releases in a separate table instead? On the other hand though, the 10th anniversary unit is still considered as Morning Musume, so I don't think we have to worry about that. --Tydus Arandor 08:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think moving those singles down into another table isn't a bad idea since they aren't really considered as Morning Musume singles and their single numbers are different. Bokura ga Ikiru MY ASIA can stay where it is since it's still in normal Morning Musume. --Chuckleberry 12:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I just moved them into a new table. I didn't separate the Single V and Concert DVD releases since there are only three (so far). This is the only way I can think of doing it right now, but if anyone has a better way of organizing it please do so. I also  --Tydus Arandor 00:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate tables for Otomegumi/Sakuragumi releases? 

message: How exactly was Rika the center in Joshi Kashimashi Monogatari? I don't think there was an actual center in that; each of the girls had their own verse.--Vikitty 19:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was probably a mistake by the person who added it, since this PV clearly had no center or main. It's hard to keep track of what's correct and what's not with this fairly long list! I'll go ahead and remove it for you now (unless, of course, if someone objects to this). -- Tydus Arandor 22:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rika JKM 

message: I have removed all or a majority of the fair use images on this page as their use was not in line with our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy (likely in that the use is not minimal (3.a.) and it is in a list or a gallery (8.)) or our Wikipedia:Non-free content guideline that states that cover images may only be used for critical commentary on the cover itself, not just identification. Please do not re-add them without discussion. Kotepho 09:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use image removal 

message: I miss album "Hawaiian de Kiku" with Takagi Boo. This isn´t official?
Wikiplk (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing article
Talk:Cutibacterium acnes

message: Mainly on its role in biofilms doi:10.1128/CMR.00092-13 JFW | T@lk 21:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  CMR review 

message: The article is incorrect. Propionibacterium is outdated nomenclature, the correct is Cutibacterium.
http://ijs.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001367
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5317161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=1912216
Kasros (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer part of genus Propionibacterium 

message: — Assignment last updated by Arianangue (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Applied Microbiology

message: — Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life

message: Made some additions to the page, please help to critique and help improve my additions. Sm2753 (talk) 01:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with edits