Talk:Constitution of the People's Republic of China

message: Read the article before editing. I mentioned private property at the end already. Discussion of amendments go at the end. The title of the article goes first, not a mention of how the subject is ignored. --Jiang
----
Put in some (hopefully NPOV) information about the relation between the Constitution and the Party.  Roadrunner 20:44, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This line confuses me: "The current revision was adopted by the National People's Congress on December 4, 1982 with further revisions in 1988, 1993, 1999, and 2004."
Does the current revision date to 1982 or 2004?   --Polynova 06:07, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
:"Revision" should be changed to "version". They promulgated an entirely new constitution in 1982. They amended this specific constitution in 1988, 1993, 1999, and 2004. --Jiang 07:13, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current revision 

message: This article, or at least the paragraph regarding the 2004 revisions, is extreamly biased and needs to be rewritten
: Agreed, in order to draw attention to it I have stuck up a NPOV sticker, hopefully someone more knowledgeable about the subject will correct it. Sjerickson07 02:23, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles Biased 

message: Tweaked the paragraphs.  The NPCSC isn't a rubber stamp as was illustrated by Sun Zhigang.  Also, PRC courts do not have the general power to invalidate a legislative statute (neither do most French courts) but they can reverse individual decisions under that Administrative Procedures Act.  Also, I'm not sure about the statement that PRC courts cannot reference the constitution in their decisions.  It is true that violation of constitutional rights is not an independent basis of action in the PRC, but I don't know of any decision or order of the Supreme People's Court that forbids referencing the Constitution.
Roadrunner 19:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitutional Enforcement 

message: ::But with all candidates for these important positions shall be first submitted and granted by CPC, and financing for all these organs coming from CPC, it is impossible to keep the independence of these organs.
There isn't a formal requirement that candidates be approved by the CCP.  Also financing doesn't come from the CCP.
Roadrunner 19:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 

message: ::Also, because the Communist Party has much control over the judicial system, they can ensure that Constitution rights cannot be used to protect people who are challenged by the State.
This needs to be expanded.  There are cases in which the judicial system *has* been used to challenge the state (i.e. land seizures and migrant rights).
Roadrunner 16:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move here 

message: ::However, China has still not yet ratified the United Nations Agreements on Human Rights, leading to questions over how honest an attempt China is making towards protecting human rights.
This is factually incorrect.  The PRC ratified the ICESCR in 1997 and the ICCPR in 1998.
:: Especially with recent years' booming economy, local governments are zealous in requisition of lands and houses by using force and without fair compensation, which raise great tension. 
This needs to be connected with the main article better.
:: Also, according to the New York Times, "The constitutional changes of March, 2004 were unlikely to have any direct influence on the outcomes of court cases, said Chinese legal experts, because the courts here usually do not test laws and government decisions for fidelity to the Constitution." 
There needs to be a larger discussion of the mechanism of constitutional enforcement in the PRC.
Roadrunner 16:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact problem 

message: ::The only exception was in 2001, in the Supreme People's Court's official reply given to Shandong Higher People's Court on the case of Qi Yuling, it first quoted the articles of constitution on education rights as base for judgement. 
This was not an exception to the lack of judicial review, since the case did not attempt to strike down a statute.
Roadrunner 16:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need rewrite 

message: I've started a re-write of this page at User:PalaceGuard008/Constitution of the People's Republic of China. As part of that project. I've created Constitutional history of the People's Republic of China. As yet unsourced, but I don't believe any of the statements should be too controversial. I will, of course, reference all contestable statement before the end. Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
Basically, I will follow roughly the scheme I used on Constitution of Australia, which itself is adapted from the scheme used on Constitution of the United States of America. I will endeavour to incorporate all relevant information currently in the article, but strive for a more comprehensive coverage of the subject, especially with a systematic overview of the actual Constitution itself. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 22:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 

message: The OCI resumed operations in 2010 after (all?) charges were dropped.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.243.117 (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections on the OCI 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Constitution of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150717131404/http://www.cqwb.com.cn/cqwb/html/2010-03/15/content_201910.htm to http://www.cqwb.com.cn/cqwb/html/2010-03/15/content_201910.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130726154413/http://english.gov.cn/2005-08/05/content_20813.htm to http://english.gov.cn/2005-08/05/content_20813.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can people here please add a link to store selling the paper version of this Constitution?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.219.181.199 (talk) 16:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper Constitution 

message: It is obviously different from the Constitution of China, and it has a separate page on Wikipedia--妖怪兽 (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed contents about CPC Constitution