Talk:Iñaki de Juana Chaos

message: Due to the sensitive nature of the article since the subject is still living, we must be very careful with WP:BLP. Please do not add unsourced information to the article. Find references from the Internet (I suggest looking at references at the es.wiki article on Iñaki de Juana Chaos) and appropriately add them here. Thanks, Nishkid64 01:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I removed reference to the December ETA attack here as there was no reference linking the ETA attack to the imprisonment of Iñaki de Juana Chaos. If ETA have stated or if commentators have suggested the strike was in retalition for holding Iñaki de Juana Chaos then we should mention this with references. If not, it's completely irrelevant Nil Einne 12:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Considering further, I remove the reference to the protests. This was also unreferenced and I question it's accuracy. Iñaki de Juana Chaos has been in prison for a long time, and is being force feed. I don't see why the Spanish government would negotiate with him. Perhaps they had promised to release him or something as part of their negotiations with ETA, I don't know. But we need a reference if we are going to claim the protests had anything to do with Iñaki de Juana Chaos and weren't just about ETA Nil Einne 12:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated at the top of this page, we must adhere to WP:BLP, which notes that any unsourced information that is potentially libellous is to be removed. gaillimhConas tá tú? 20:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The label "mass murderer" is indeed redundant, as it is already mentioned that he's been convicted of killing multiple people.  In addition, assigning him the label "mass murderer" skews the neutral point of view of the article (as some label him a terrorist, others a soldier) WP:BLP is very clear on the removal of biased and misleading information - see here. gaillimhConas tá tú? 22:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The article is to be written in a neutral point of view, which includes the elimination of any potential biased or misleading information, or labels, in this case.  It is mentioned in the article that he's been convicted of terrorism by the Spanish government already gaillimhConas tá tú? 23:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good!  Thanks a lot for taking the initiative! gaillimhConas tá tú? 23:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Third opinion
I will provide an anwer to just one point of difference as requested in third party opinion page, whether mass murderer is appropriate. First we need to find a WP:RS that calls him as such second it will fail WP:NPOV even if it is found. It is much more acceptable to call him as convicted of murdering number(give the correct number) of people. Then cite it properly. That will pass neutrality test.RaveenS 23:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP information

message: The La Haine source I have inserted is clearly not neutral but for the minimal use (names and dates) it gets should be enough.
It however mentions cases where the Spanish government has yielded before strikers.
If somebody can add a neutral source on those, they would be mention-worthy.
--Error 00:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: La Haine

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "Times" :
** Catan, Thomas.  Shackled and emaciated, Eta killer pleads for peace from his deathbed.  The Times.  5 February 2007.  Accessed online 7 February 2007.
** Prison staff deny manslaughter by neglect over suicide of inmate - Times Online
DumZiBoT (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: Several Wikipedia users have deleted all the information I have added. I have twice as many sources in my additions as they do in the original version they insist on restoring. As a matter of fact, they have deleted every pieces of information I have added since it presents substantial data about this person's biographical record that don't match the original article in which most of what he has done in his life was ignored.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genericcoop (talk • contribs) 21:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not one of the edits you have made satisfy WP:NPOV and some are infact violations of WP:BLP, also you have breached WP:3RR and I suggest you self revert to avoid a block. Mo ainm (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits 

message: Please remove the following text from the "Prison sentence" section - "(Gallizo http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id25.html and The Shield http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id23.html)". As you can see it's a self-published tripod hosted site, and the rest of the sentence is sourced by the Times reference at the end of the sentence. Thanks. 2 lines of K303 14:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ... it took a very minor rewording as well. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Much of the information in the introductory paragraph is repeated again in the main section and I would propose that the introduction should be shortened. It would make the text read better because it would be less repetitious. 
One man's freedom fighter (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Substituted at 19:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment