Talk:Sparkster: Rocket Knight Adventures 2

message: The airship stage is not the only one with autoscrolling. The part of the first stage where the player walks on a train has autoscrolling too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.10.129.46 (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Autoscrolling

message: At the moment, typing in Sparkster: Rocket Knight Adventures 2 is the only way to bring up the article, if a few redirect's could be added that would be great. InfernoSonic 03 October 2007 19:05
:I think it would be better just to merge all the content Sparkster (SNES) into this article and then move all the info to Sparkster. Even if they're totally different games, the SNES version's article is totally devoid of content. Jonny2x4 (talk) 04:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need for a merge, it's a perfectly legit stub.--Nydas(Talk) 10:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then expand the article! Either way, I don't see the need for two separate articles, considering both games came around the same time and are both titled Sparkster. I mean all three versions of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tournament Fighters are covered in the same article, why not this? Jonny2x4 (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, the articles should not be merged. They are entirely separate games, with different storylines, gameplay mechanics, stages, and enemies, and the title isn't a problem because one has the subtitle "Rocket Knight Adventures 2" and the other doesn't. They're at least as different as, say, Mega Man 2 and Mega Man 3 (or, for that matter, Mega Man II (Game Boy)). Cosmetor (talk) 20:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose; they're different games, and both articles have enough content. No reason to merge. 65.94.106.173 (talk) 23:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, sorry, that was me. I forgot to sign in. Esn (talk) 23:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sparkster: RKA2 page started

message: Citing the "Possible copyright infringement" tag:
The previous content of this page appears to infringe on the copyright of the text from the source(s) below and is now listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems: identify non-web source here
This sure is a perfectly accurate identification of the source where the pressumed copyrighted content was taken from.(Mr Wesker (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's easy enough to find that information in edit summary. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Story section

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed