lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Use of webcams

message: Hello experts of Wikipedia. It seems the first article I submitted on,use of webcams, titled Webcam Revolution was a disaster by all accounts in editors minds. I will attempt to edit it and keep trying to improve it. Thanks for the tough reality check on what Wikipedia is all about! Hopefully I will be able to get your expert advice on placing it in an appropriate Category and making the changes that were suggested rather then have it deleted. --Cartman21 05:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Wtf is this article, it has some kind of "feel-good" mood in it. I'm currently in the process of merging it with the Webcam article. --62.251.21.22 (talk) 16:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feel good-style?
Talk:The Contractor (2007 film)

message: It said 6 August, but IMDB says 10 July. -- Beardo 05:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: This article needs major cleanup, it reads like a review out of a website, except with lots of points missing. Cleanup impending. --Flashflash; 07:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I've only seen fragments of this film on free-view television; but it's striking to me that the fact a significant part of the film is set in Romania forms no part of plot or other descriptions of the film.  Might be filmed in Bulgaria, I don't know, but the setting is definitely Bucharest in part; evidenced by language, police uniforms, wall signs and car registration plates.
Much of the plot section appears to plagiarise IMDB.
I'm a regular visitor to Romania (but not Romanian).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.120.231.151 (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgaria/Romania 

message: "Please change "Richard Harrington as Terry Mitchell" to "Richard Harrington as Terry Winchell" and email me with a notification that you have corrected it to candygunsall@yahoo.com. Thank you! :)" Candy Gunsallero (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2022
Talk:Indian Idol (season 3)

message: The following users may have potentially vandalised this article,
this is a preliminary list subject to further investigation
* [[Special:Contributions/60.243.63.202|60.243.63.202
* 59.92.242.118
* 216.80.84.123
* 58.178.23.43
* 59.93.204.93
* 74.130.26.89
* 203.175.64.10
Realdan 18:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:List of American films of 1985

message: Hey, Blofeld, I created this page so that I didn't fill up the history with my edits. You can make edits there, just tell me that you're going to on it's talk page. When I finish filling in the stuff and removing the non-American ones I'll combine it with this page. I'll be careful not to undo anything. Just thought I ought to say something.--Song 20:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Work page
Talk:Big Bad Wolf (2006 film)

message: David Naughton appearing as the sheriff in this movie may have been a purposeful  Easter egg or Cameo. David Naughton played the lead in the John Landis Academy Award winning {Best Makeup) movie An American Werewolf in London in 1981. Naughton played David Kessler, the young American backpacker who turns into a werewolf almost totally on-screen. The transformation effects of Kessler turning into a werewolf were groundbreaking for their realism at the time. Naughton was probably cast as the sheriff in this movie precisely because of his role 25 years earlier as the young man who becomes a werewolf. 2601:14A:503:64C0:353E:2324:3DD1:4428 (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easter Egg - cameo?
Talk:Tulsa Philharmonic

message: If anyone knows where I can find more information on the history of the orchestra please let me know. There is surprisingly very little information available on the web. You would think that an orchestra that exsisted for 54 years wouldn't dissapear so easily.Nrswanson 05:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Information
Talk:Lurking Fear (film)

message: Anyone know where I can get this film?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArdClose (talk • contribs) 15:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No title
Category talk:Youth wings of political parties in Canada

message: I would like several opinions about whether see also lists on the above pages should list other Youth organizations when it duplicates the purpose of this catagory list.  As it stands the see also lists on the pages are not applied uniformly, and thus corupts the neutrality of wikipedia.  
My suggestion is to either apply the five pages to the see also lists, or remove the 4-5 pages from the see also lists and let this catagory page do its intended job.
J. D. Pfaff 06:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding redundancy of see also lists
Talk:Lauren Chapin

message: This article is about a living person and includes allegations of drug abuse, sexual abuse, and prostitution, yet there are no citations.
:Good point! I found sources for some citations and added them, but more support is needed. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

message: I just wanted to let Lauren know that I am watching reruns of Father Knows Best and thought she looked so cute in the series 2601:582:C000:9330:FC39:8655:542A:B358 (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father Knows Best
Talk:Erica Larson

message: Ummm, I suggest moving this page to include at least a middle initial. I know an Erica Larson from high school...this is definitely not her...--Ioshus (talk) 12:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there's a WP article about the girl you knew in high school which is causing confusion, there's no need to add a middle initial. --DeLarge 18:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  middle name
Talk:Tilly Losch

message: Among prominent choreographers who made roles for Losch were Frederick Ashton, George Balanchine, Leonide Massine and Anthony Tudor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:8102:FEB0:C0C5:7D27:4885:E8A5 (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: (London production of The Miracle) Losch's part was rewritten to provide her with the only spoken dialogue in the production...
:I thought it was only the Madonna who was silent until the end, when she would recite the Lord's Prayer. You make it sound like a mainly silent production. Is this what it was? Valetude (talk) 20:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only spoken dialogue?
Talk:Just You and Me, Kid

message: As suggested by the Problem Banner, I edited the Plot article -- making it much more concise.  However, I am unable to remove the (no longer necessary) Problem Banner because I cannot find its link.  Can someone either delete the Banner directly or tell me how to do it.  Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samson3000 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost 5 years later, I finally removed tag. :) Msw1002 (talk) 22:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unable to remove Problem Banner
Talk:The Church (1989 film)

message: The production section is in dire need of edits, some are grammatical, but others require the sources, to which I don't have access. A sentence ends "where the passengers", and a sentence I know refers to the previous Demons movies (wherein Soavi calls them "pizza schlock") is now just floating at the end with no antecedent. There are other odd bits and pieces here, but they need someone with access to the cited sources.
FangsFirst (talk) 03:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Production section
Talk:History of Laos (1945–present)

message: This article badly needs some citations.Mattun0211 (talk) 08:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Three and a half years later, and there are no inline citations. Some-one should put a notice on the page itself.211.225.33.104 (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations needed 

message: Opium farming and labs producing morphine and heroin were a major industry in Laos. This book has a very well researched history of this. Chapter 7 has a wealth of information about it.
*  (The link is to the complete text of the book.) 
Ubh (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is absolutely no mention of  the massive amount of opium produced in Laos 

message: The article states that the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu was not that a great a military loss. I beg to differ. They lost half the Foreign Legion there; total French Union Forces lost amounted to about ten percent of all French Union troops in the war. That's minor?
Georgejdorner (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dien Bien Phu a minor defeat?
Talk:Toyota AZ engine

message: Added a small edit to the 2AZ-FE section, stating that only the 2008 Scion xB's receive the 2AZ engine. Whitecastlechris 06:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  xB in 2AZ-FE model listing 

message: Which toyota motor uses 2az engine 102.90.43.61 (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toyota 2az Engine
Talk:Vampire Secrets

message: "Susan Walsh" links to wrong Susan Walsh, link should be removed192.128.167.68 (talk) 16:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, 
I took the liberty to remove the Notab tag you had inserted in May. I agree the page had (has?) something annoyingly promotional about it (remains of older versions, I assume) but I found quite many mentions of this docudrama in independent books and brief (negative) reviews. If you think it’s still not enough, maybe take it to Afd? Thank you, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Vang Tao Incident

message: Southern Thailand near the Malaysian border is the area for Muslim insurrectionists.  The Hmong in Northern Thailand are at the opposite end of the country and live straddling the Lao/Thai boundary. This simple geographic fact renders Hmong involvement nonsensical.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe southern here refers to southern Laos (same for the rebellion). The opening referring to the event as "an episode broadcast on television" is confusing and should be rewritten, though. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmong in southern Thailand?
Talk:Space Chimps

message: This change is mine. I removed the statement about the writer's strike because the attached reference did not mention anything about the original release date. A quick Google search did not yield any other sources that could confirm this fact, so I deleted the statement and moved the reference to the statement of the current release date. --Beefyt (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement about writer's strike 

message: Why can't we put the quotes??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.88.195 (talk) 21:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Three reasons: A. It's stupid. B. It's unencyclopedic. C. That's exactly what "Wikiquote" was created for. -- Jasonbres (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: The trivia section only has one item and has been removed once. I reverted but with a note that the section should be expanded and not presented as a list. --FilmFan69 (talk) 01:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: * The film's opening features the iconic piece Also Sprach Zarathustra as Ham's noble ancestry is being described.
* When the inhabitants of the planet Malgor (as mentioned in the film) do not know of Earth, Ham states one of its key achievements as iTunes.
* On a "Simon" style intelligence test, Ham plays "Axel F".
* While the crew members are being transported through the wormhole, Ham witnesses a portrayed "Star Gate" similar to the one in 2001: A Space Oddysey.
* During a rant, Stanley Tucci's character mentions Buck Rogers, following with the statement "I love Buck Rogers!" by one of the NASA scientists.
* On the alien planet where Zartog has taken control, he orders the construction of a structure resembling a Las Vegas casino he has seen on a video prepared by NASA.
* Near the film's end, Titan asks Ham multiple questions including "Are you David Bowie?" in trying to convince him that he is an astronaut.
Triva moved from article. --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 15:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to Popular Culture 

message: the film was the worst one i saw!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.213.6 (talk) 23:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion
Talk:Marxian economics/Archive 3

message: I will summarize recent posts and comment on where I think we are right now. 
We began to talk about the hoax tag. I suggested what I (naively) thought might be something we could get an early consensus on — eliminating the link and the hoax tag. No consensus. So we are going to have to work on this. While this was happening several process issues cropped up: Discussion about the nature of consensus; issues relating to personal attacks; consideration of a revert that was made for which there was no consensus. I have moved all these process issues to a section entitled "Further process issues" (above). I suggest that we maintain this section for process questions as we go along and focus the discussion below on content. 
It has not been an easy day, but I appreciate the cooperation that editors have (for the most part) shown. Sunray 06:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reject your "suggestion" regarding the page - which you implemented without even attempting to achive consensus. Watchdog07 17:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary May 25, 2007

message: I believe that we have consensus on this:
* The links to the forthcoming journal, COPE, will be removed for now, as will the  tag.
Have I got this right? Anyone wishing to comment further, please do so by 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT), 2007-05-28. Assuming the consensus holds, the decision will then be implemented. Sunray 01:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, you don'ty have it right. Watchdog07 16:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Consensus achieved. Changes made. Sunray 16:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Consensus was not achieved, but it is a moot question since there is no reference to COPE in the article now. Watchdog07 16:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are entitled to your opinion, However the policy on consensus was applied. Sunray 02:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I was away this weekend, and couldn't comment, but I'm glad to see the hoax tag issue has been resolved. --Extra Fine Point 03:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your positive comment. Care to sign on in the section above? Sunray 05:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Consensus on hoax tag issue
Talk:Philip Giaccone

message: This article should be deleted for a number of reasons.  Two of those reasons are put forth below:
(1) It is an article about a person who is not particularly significant in any way.  
(2) It is libelous and puts forth numerous untrue statements - which are clearly not supported by any of the citations provided in the article, nor by any other published materials.
Pwilliams128 (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason I would argue Giaccone deserves an article is that he was the man who was supposed to be murdered by Donnie Brasco in order for Brasco (really Joe Pistone) to become made. The article could be improved to focus a bit more on that aspect. Secondly, you can't commit libel regarding a dead man. If the article libels another, living person, that's a different story altogether.--Gloriamarie (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anna Gutto

message: The article says that she worked on or produced something.  Then in the next section, it says that she brought the relevant playright to American notice.  The next section says that she may have directed it.  Another section says that she may have appeared in it.  Yet another section says that she adapted it.  Even another section says that she wrote an essay about her work on it.  Can someone please try to condense all this to talk about all the things she did concerning each work that she directed/co-wrote/adapted/produced/appeared in? -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Editors have done some helpful rewriting. Thanks. The theatre section should be streamlined more (some of it is really not encyclopedically WP:NOTEWORTHY), more dates need to be added everywhere, and it should be made clear that her film career is more noteworthy than her rather WP:MILL theatre work. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved now. Cielquiparle (talk) 22:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Extreme repetition
Talk:Jill Bennett (American actress)

message: Can this be semi-protected or something? There's been a lot of pretty weird vandalism lately. 130.243.171.193 (talk) 11:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: She was not in Michelle Paradise's Exes and Ohs, the movie she was in is called X's & Oh's (director Kedar Corde). It's not the logo series.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.68.209.33 (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  filmographie 

message: There is a discussion concerning this page at Talk:Jill Bennett (British actress). Please contribute there and not here. Station1 (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Truth in Lending Act

message: These are all false statments and this act is a bunch of BS 
This article is even more clear: And some economists said usury caps were a waste of time because the Truth in Lending Act guaranteed that issuers would disclose rates, Farley said. They believed the required disclosures would direct consumers away from high charges. As a result, there is no federal cap on rates. "The federal government only requires that whatever rates, fees or terms are set by issuers be disclosed to the consumer in accordance with the Truth in Lending Act," said Farley." Carol Moore 02:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So why was this act created? Why was it put into place? What caused lawmakers to decide to put this into effect? There was probably some big controversy or problem that led to the creation of this act. Some history would be helpful. DMahalko (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A history of why it was enacted?

message: Existing: 
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) of 1968 is a United States federal law designed to promote the informed use of consumer credit, by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost to standardize the manner in which costs associated with borrowing are calculated and disclosed.
Proposed:
The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) of 1968 is a United States federal law designed to promote the informed use of consumer credit. It aims to standardize the calculation and disclosure of costs associated with borrowing.
Existing duplication: 
With the exception of certain high-cost mortgage loans, TILA does not regulate the charges that may be imposed for consumer credit. Rather, it requires uniform or standardized disclosure of costs and charges so that consumers can shop.
 
I started to ponder the awkward use of "its" in the first quote, and this is where I landed. 
— MaxEnt 15:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplified opening para
Talk:Private foundation

message: Detailed content moved from USA subheading to separate page dedicated to private foundations in the USA.  It's called Private foundation (USA).EECavazos 02:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content move, USA

message: Brilliant addition of Sweden!  The civil law sections needed filling in, actually as does the common law section with Australia and Canada.  Where are some Aussie and Canucks when you need them?EECavazos 23:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why in the world would Canada be listed under the civil law section?  It is most assuredly a common law jurisdiction.  2600:1004:B152:7609:A592:C778:907C:634 (talk) 01:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: civil law

message: Do we need to merge Offshore foundation into this article? nirvana2013 (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed. nirvana2013 (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merger? 

message: People helping 203.135.47.56 (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  People helping
Talk:John Wayne filmography (1926–1940)

message: Was Wayne really in this film?  I know the text in the table states he only had a bit part, and the scenes were deleted, but I can't find any source to say he was in this film.  He's not listed on IMDB as being in this film, which I find odd as other earlier films do include Wayne in the credits, even if he was uncredited at the time.  I'm happy to make an article for the film and cite Wayne as being in it, once a reliable source for this has been found. Lugnuts 12:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently he was.  There is a book in print called The John Wayne Filmography which lists the film and also has a photo from it.  In the photo we can see Wayne sporting a mustache, something he only did in three other films: She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, Rio Grande, and The Shootist; and they came much later in his career.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.129.146 (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sweetheart of Sigma Chi
Talk:John Wayne filmography (1941–1960)

message: I added the name Genghis Khan in parentheses under the name Temüjin for The Conqueror - I had come to the article looking for the name of the film in which Wayne played Genghis Khan but didn't see him listed under the Genghis Khan name, as a result I went through all his filmography articles looking for the name until it occured to me to try Temüjin. 47of74 (talk) 06:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temüjin / Genghis Khan
Talk:Barry Creyton

message: Barry wrote this? Not Tommy Tycho? Tycho has so little to say in his autobiog about Mavis Bramston that it makes one wonder...--2001:44B8:3102:BB00:EDC5:2988:6CA0:5819 (talk) 06:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Togetherness?
Talk:Black Community Services Center

message: I cannot begin to imagine why the source includes material about how to create an article. Please explain. Anonymous Dissident Utter 07:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation
Talk:Curculio nucum

message: Last sentence of text says the weevil has three developmental stages. However, I believe the larvae that emerge from acorns pupate underground, so that this insect has four stages, including the pupa. I don't know of a reference to cite for this information.
Cognita (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete metamorphosis?