lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A Hunger Artist

message: This article says that Kafka got himself an office job he hated in order to support his family. That's absolutely wrong - Kafka's father was a prosperous merchant, and Kafka himself was never married, nor did he have any children so he only needed to support himself, if even that.
: Yes, it's unsupported drivel from some essay or exam cheat site. --Tony Sidaway 20:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy?

message: I've created an analysis section using this source. The information appears to be copyrighted, but it falls under "fair-use", right? Sofeil 15:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  I've removed a lot of hack work that was copied wholesale from some crappy essay website.  In general, analysis should refer to recognised scholars in reliable published works. The copied material was, needless to say, an infringement of copyright. --Tony Sidaway 20:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?

message: The article claims that "The protagonist is an archetypical creation of Kafka, an individual marginalised and victimised by society at large."  I disagree - I think it is fairly clear from the story that the hunger artist separated himself from society.  He says "I couldn’t find a food which I enjoyed.  If I had found that, believe me, I would not have made a spectacle of myself and would have eaten to my heart’s content, like you and everyone else.” [emphasis mine]  I'm no great writer so I hesitate to change the article myself but I think someone else maybe should.  I believe it is generally a misreading of Kafka to think of his characters as loners and outcasts but that is perhaps more open to argument generally than it is in this particular case.  
Cyclopsface 05:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Victimized and Marginalized by Society?
Talk:George Walton

message: Part of the text is garbled and needs to be corrected. Please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.34.245 (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: It is my understanding that are no living descendants of George Walton, the Signer.  This is documented in many sources.  Where did you get your verification of living descendants?  Many claim kin, but are not. Pertpriest (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendants of George Walton, Signer of the Declaration of Independence
Talk:He (surname)

message: i cleaned this article up with info from the us census on chinese family names in the US, and the "He" names that referred to "Ho". i feel okay about the mandarin, but know no cantonese--if someone who does could tke a look, that'd be appreciated. Nateji77 06:05, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Canto seems legit Renart.fox (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Expedition (book)

message: Somebody thinks they're being cute by having the publication date as 2358, but what's the real publication?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.85.151.96 (talk) 07:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2358? 
Talk:Evergreen, Colorado

message: John Hinckley, Jr. lived in Evergreen's Hiwan Hills development for several years. Not sure if this merits mention. See http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/hinckley/HBIO.HTM for one reference.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Spizzwink (talk • contribs) 06:23, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hinckley
Talk:Sooke

message: Is Sooke considered a part of Greater Victoria?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.66.110 (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi all, 
I was told to post here about re-instating a deleted link to my blog, 642Blog.ca. It's been linked in the external links for months, but today somebody informed me that I have a conflict of interest and deleted it. The blog is a community and real estate blog, but I do not use it for advertising - it is strictly informational and would be of value for those seeking information on Sooke and about what is going on currently in town. I urge you to take a look, and allow me to add it back in. 
Many thanks. Tim.
TDot1980 (talk) 06:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a look at that blog, and that is exactly what it is. Sources are suposed to be from reliable, third part publications. While the info on your blog might be 100% accurate, it is still just a blog. Masterhatch (talk) 18:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to 642Blog.ca
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 6, 2005

message: Possibly, :Image:Nirvana around 1992.jpg could be used as a replacement image here (the previous one was removed as non-free). Carcharoth 13:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible replacement image
Talk:Giorgi Arveladze

message: The guy's last name should probably be capitalized.
:That's what the move button is for.  Done. Ceejayoz 17:17, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Why do you write "Giorgi Arveladze has returend to private business"? He was never working in the private sector before. Actually, he was working in the public sector since 2000 when he finished his studies and started working for the Georgian Parliament. 85.178.209.97 (talk) 13:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arveladze didn't "return" to private business
Talk:Ileo-anal pouch

message: Kangaroo links here, due to the link to pouch. Is this intentional? --romanm (talk) 06:57, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. I have transformed pouch into a disambiguation page to solve the problem. Schutz 14:40, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Kangaroo links here, due to the link to pouch

message: I've added a substantial amount of information about the surgical procedure and pouch behaviour... I plan to add more, and some illustrations. I have a pouch myself, and know a lot about the medical procedure from both the extensive literature available from the Red Lion group, directly from medics and surgeons at St. Mark's hospital, and from personal experience. All the information I upload can be found on St. Mark's website. --Jeeves (talk) 17:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: added a substantial amount of information

message: Crohn's Disease should be removed from the "reasons for pouch construction" bulleted list.  It is general practice in the medical community to not perform this procedure on patients with Crohn's Disease.  Crohn's patients are sometimes misdiagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis due to similarities in the diseases.  The procedure is performed as a result of the misdiagnosis and not as a treatment option for Crohn's Disease. Gibbs3 (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. This important correction has been ignored for seven years so far. Aren't there any medically-trained editors around? David Spector (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Crohn's Disease should be removed from the "reasons for pouch construction"

message: Entering the search term "IPAA", yields the page: The Intellectual Property Attache Act which is abbreviated IPAA.
The problem is that there is another page with the same abbreviation (IPAA) that is more popular, Ileo-anal_pouch. The abbreviation itself is widely used - a Google search of "ipaa surgery" yields 92,000 results.
Granted, there is a link provided on The Intellectual Property Attache Act page: "IPAA" redirects here. For surgery, see Ileo-anal pouch. But consider that The Intellectual Property Attache Act page gets about 2 hits a day while Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis gets about 250 per day.
Could the redirect page for IPAA be corrected to give priority to the more popular page? McortNGHH (talk) 10:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the redirect to a DAB page. See talk over at IPAA. Little pob (talk) 13:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better handling of IPAA redirect possible?
Talk:Ros na Rún

message: ros2, m. (gs. & npl. ~a, gpl. ~). 1. (a') Wood. (b) Wooded headland. 2. Headland, promontory.
rún, m. (gs. & npl. rúin, gpl. ~). 1. Mystery. 2. Secret. 3. (a) Intention, purpose. (b) Secret disposition; (evil) design. 4. (Formal) resolution. 5. (a) Love, affection. (b) Loved one; dear one, friend.
Foclóir Gaeilge-Béarla, Niall Ó Dónaill, 1977
Ros, g. rois, ruis, -a, pl. id., and -anna, m., a wood or copse (r. f oḋḃaiḋe id., Sup.), oft. the site of an old cemetery ; a point, promontory, bluff or isthmus (r. uisce, id., Sup.) ; a level tract of arable land.
Rún, -úin, pl. id. and -na, m., a secret, a mystery, a riddle, secrecy ; secret or mystic meaning (= sians, P.H.) ; secret plan or resolution, hence a resolution in general, intention, inclination, disposition (good or bad) ; a resolution or decision (rec.) ; a sweetheart or beloved person ; love, esteem.
Foclóir Gaeḋilge agus Béarla, Rev. Patrick S. Dinneen, 1934
—Moilleadóir 07:06, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions 

message: Recently a significant amount of this content was suddenly removed for cleanup per WP:PLOT. While I agree that much of this effort aligns with WP:PLOT about indiscriminate collection of information (such as trivia), I disagree with removing all the hard effort behind summaries as this provides important back context / history that impact the work today. More importantly, WP:PLOT reads as discouraging summary-only articles without encyclopedic content, not the inclusion of summaries itself. ("Wikipedia treats creative works in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works.)
If summaries be arbitrarily removed here, that throws numerous articles on works of fiction - many containing series / seasonal summaries - into dispute. If the length of the article is in question, rather than removal, alternatives is further refinement of the text (per MOS:PLOT) or placing seasonal information on it's own page (as characters were). I am open to starting the latter effort to help refine this main page, but at this time I question if the amount of information warrants it's own entry until more details are able to be gathered on back seasons.
--Ends of the World (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of season summaries
Talk:Dollard-Des Ormeaux–Roxboro

message: The situation with regard to this toponym is completely confused. As far as I can tell, the borough spells it Dollard-des-Ormeaux (which is how the former city spelled it as well), the Commission de Toponymie spells it Dollard-Des Ormeaux (from the rules on dealing with nobility particles in names, such as that of Adam Dollard, sieur des Ormeaux), and the city of Montreal can't make up its mind between Des-Ormeaux and Des Ormeaux.
Until these people get their wits together, I'm going to leave this puppy right where it is. The borough won't exist five months from now, anyway, and we can use whatever spelling the new municipality prefers. - Montréalais 07:48, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Federalism in Australia

message: This article state that "Australia is the fifth oldest federation in the world after the United States (1789), Switzerland (1848), Canada (1867) and the German Empire (1871)". However, Mexico was officially declared as a Federation in the 1824 Constitution. Also Brazil is a Federation since 1891 Constitution, before Australian federalism. That line should be removed or modified...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.168.248.251 (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifth oldest federation?
Template talk:User pt

message: Something's wrong when this template (with the new markup) is embedded in the Babel box, see my user page (pt took the entire width of the box). I don't know wiki markup enough to fix it properly (except for a full revert to the old one). - Fbergo 08:45, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what I did.  I reverted back to the old code, and now the template is looking normal again.  I haven't the slightest idea of why this happened, especially since a similar change was made to other Babel templates I have on my user page and none of them was deformed, just this one.  Unless (or until) someone can figure out what the problem was and fix it, I'd recommend keeping the old code, at least for the time being.  Regards, Redux 02:51, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kōjien

message: I think that it is proper to include the macron in the title and in the opening sentence. This article needs historical background: when did Kôjien first appear, and how many editions has it gone through? What is the evidence that “many Japanese” consider it to be the standard? The article states that “not all electronic dictionaries include it,” but in fact the overwhelming majority do. The only maker that does not include it as the standard kokugo jiten appears to be Canon. No mention is made of the fact that it includes many proper names, so it is as much an encyclopedia as a language dictionary. The article is still labeled a stub. Is it? If not, it should be filled out enough to be a proper article, and the stub category should be deleted. Jb05-Hds2 03:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fully in favour of your proposed changes, please do what you like. This article was originally a joke article due to be deleted, and I added a little info to make it make sense, but I'm sure people from your group can do much better. DannyWilde 05:06, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed changes

message: The article states that the Koujien only lists dead people. This is not true. Making some obvious checks, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, and Reagan (it was compiled in 1998) are all listed.
Echnin 18:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead People
Talk:Kapa haka

message: :Do feel free to improve it. Mona-Lynn 00:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done some work on this, and left the following message --Hello there 222.153.2.249. You were right that Kapa haka was all wrong, I have done my best to fix it but it could do with further input. Can you help?-- on the page of the user who wrote "This is all wrong" above. Hopefully we can find a photo somewhere.  Moriori 02:54, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
What is all wrong is that kapa means GROUP, not "kind of performance". The kapa haka is the people, not what they do. --Hugh7 01:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I have edited it to make that clear, while allowing it to have both meanings where I could.--Hugh7 08:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please include more references and this article may move to C-class. Adabow (talk)  19:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Korea Aerospace Research Institute

message: wish list:
*more comprehensive list of projects
*history of changes in name and administrative status
*Source for budget?
*sharper linking to IAE (which one?) --marsian 11:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wish list 
Talk:Pinoy Pop Superstar

message: Replace 'under construction...' with a TV-stub.  It is more appropiate. --Jojit fb 09:47, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The subject should be in present tense because the program is still on-air. --Jojit fb 10:28, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK — the article didn't mention that there was another season.  It needs more copy-editing then.  I'll do that now. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 14:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Present tense

message: It is best to put it into past tense. The show is currently defunct. --J.J. Nario ilyk2learn 10:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Past tense
Talk:Rangoon bombing

message: I found this article which has a number of important photos which I think should be added to this article. 1983.10.9 미얀마 아웅산 폭파사건 -- 71.141.121.26 (talk) 06:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos and more info 
Talk:Robert Holmes (Royal Navy officer)

message: I don't think the use of evidence from Pepys is quite right here.
In the Diary at 22 Dec 1661 Pepys is not "complaining about his magnificent lifestyle", but objecting to his presence in Pepys' church because of Holmes' unwelcome interest in Pepys' (very attractive) wife.  Pepys' mention of Holmes' "gold laced coat" is a sneer to be sure, but hardly a complaint about his magnificent lifestyle.
What is your source for this comment?
Thruston 09:55, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There is no mention of a duel between Buckingham and Shrewsbury (who died) and also John Talbot and Jenkins (who died).  And Holmes.  Although dueling was far too common at the time, it was still remarkable that two Peers fought in such a manner, and that two deaths resulted. According to Pepys, all who fought (the seconds fought, as well as the main combatants) were injured.  So it does appear that Holmes fought in the duel, was hurt, but survived.  Unless my reading is careless, I do not recall having noticed this incident in "Man of War" (of which I have a copy).  It is reported, naturally, in Pepys's diary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.103.91 (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of a duel?
Talk:Korea Greens

message: wish list:
*names of leaders
*are they an official party, or just a political group?
As far as I know they are not active as a political party, not participating in any elections nationally. They do are active as a group in the current anti-US beef protests in South-Korea.
Enni84 (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Irish Republican Army

message: I've just set up a new category entitled Sinn Féin but am thinking whether it would be a better idea to combine it with this category as much of the same personalities and organisations are bound to end up on the two (e.g. Ruairí Ó Brádaigh, Gerry Adams etc). The problem is how to best name this category. Irish republicanism is too broad a category. How about "Physical Force Irish Republicanism" or is that too long winded?--Damac 10:06, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of title?

message: I've seen the arguments on the edit history page, but I think adding this Irish Republican Army page to the terrorism through the decades lists is acceptable. Whether or not the IRA is considered a 'terrorist' organisation, a significant number of items on the list are indisputably terrorist acts: attacks on the civilian population designed to cause terror, such as the La Mon Restaurant Bombing, the Milltown Massacre, the Birmingham pub bombings or the Remembrance Day Bombing, or attacks against security forces which caused large civilian casualties too, such as the M62 Coach Bombing or the Guildford pub bombing. These actions were demonstrably terrorist, whatever the overall nature of the organisation. In addition, terrorism is listed as a category on the main Provisional Irish Republican Army, and all the events listed above are listed on the pages I linked too. I think that if people have a real problem with these categories, there should at least be a discussion before it is reverted.--Jackyd101 02:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorism

message: For the benefit of anyone wondering why the INLA cat is now a subcat of this one. The INLA split from the Official IRA, therefore if the PIRA splinter groups such as CIRA (and their splinter groups) and RIRA are in there, the INLA should be as well. One Night In Hackney303 21:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: INLA

message: I have removed this category from :Category:Irish revolutionaries, which is a category for people, not for organisations or events, and it was causing all sorts of articles such as 1987 in the Irish Republican Army to be placed inappropriately under the :Category:Irish people tree.  However, I have added  to :Category:Irish revolutionaries. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parent categories
Talk:Ksar el-Kebir

message: I wonder if there is evidence of his death. In my old school history classes, we learned about it was never clear wether the king of Portugal was killed, captured, scaped or whatever happened to him.
::There were no outspoken witnesses of his death, which led to the wildest speculations. But he almost certainly fell in battle. Probably the remains buried in the Jeronimos Monastery at Lisbon are his own. Besides, the Moors would have been very interested in capturing him alive, allowing them to demand one of the nicest ransoms in history. Besides bucket-loads of gold they could have demanded every single Portuguese fortress in Morocco in exchange for the king, and the Portuguese would be in no position to refuse it. If he'd survived, we'd have heard about it. Thucydidian (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Sebastião 

message: There's an unsourced gay marriage entry. I'm deleting it. Boshiaki (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fouada? 

message: The locator map shows Ksar-el-Kebir very near Tetouan. It is not there!154.5.186.97 (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locator map in error 

message: Please source for: "It was occupied by the Portuguese during Afonso V's reign in 1458. It was difficult to access the stronghold by sea and it had a relatively minor strategic importance. Because of that and also because of the economic crisis, John III decided to abandon the stronghold in 1550". According the Encyclopaedia of Islam, the city never was occupated by portuguese, and their atack in 1503 was rejected--88.16.141.234 (talk) 09:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ahhh, I see, seems that  there's a confussion with al-Ksar al-Seghir, that really was occupated 1458 and evacuated 1549. Please correct it.--88.16.141.234 (talk) 10:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese ocuppation 

message: Watch the dashes and the articles, the name of this article currently is Ksar el-Kebir. In the sidebar the name is written El-Ksar-el-Kebir, category on commons is Ksar-el-Kebir, in the text we can find El-Ksar el Kebir and  el-Ksar el-Kebir... Palosirkka (talk) 14:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration fun: the name of this article
Talk:Korean arguments on Yamato period

message: Use of the title "Tennou" (Emperor) started after Japan imported Chinese convention in line of (Koutei) (Japanese pronounciation of Chinese word Emperor). So describing the head of state of Yamato  as "King" is not a mistake. FWBOarticle
: Hello FWBOarticle -- My change of Tortfeasor's edit to "King" was based on the actual page names for Emperor Ojin and Emperor Kimmei.  If you'd like to take issue with those titles, feel free to do so on those respective Talk pages.  If your goal here is simply to be as accurate as possible, that's fine too.  If you (or anyone else) decide to change the links here on the Korean arguments on Yamato period page, please use the piped link style.  Thank you, Eiríkr Útlendi 19:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles
Talk:Joon Gon Kim

message: *date and place of birth?
*what was he doing between 1957 and 2004?
*cite sources and reasons for his death
*mention his personal life and family?
*mention causes for his death, where he died, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shazbots (talk • contribs) 16:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wish list