Template talk:Aqidah

message: There is no such thing as "salaffiyah" as a school of divinity, salafis are Athari in their school of Aqeedah. Sakimonk  talk 00:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you for the addition of the schools of divinity but I've corrected it 

message: The list is not accurate, Mu'tazili is the main shia school but historically it was heavily adopted by those sunni in fiqh (like hanafi mutazilis). So it should be an OTHER school. Moreover, Murjia are definately NOT extinct, some scholars argue that a HUGE proportion of Muslims are influence by murjia philsophy hence why so many muslims you come across don't pray salah! I've named it Other schools because they are alive and kicking sadly lol. Sakimonk  talk 17:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay but they aren't shia exclusively Sakimonk  talk 17:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just put the schools listed under shia as other, except bataniyah, that's all im asking. because many who follow them weren't shia. Only in modern times it is mostly shia thanks to the dawah of the Sunni leaders following the crusades and Imam Ghazali etc. most Sunnis gave up these deviant ideas but shias kept them. Sakimonk  talk 17:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also can you fix the bracket under sunni Islam, it looks so ugly! Sakimonk  talk 17:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murjiah and using "extinct" 

message: your recent edits have been causing much disruption in this template. Please discuss your edits here before going through. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You have already been reverted by one other user. Yet you continue to include your text , which is completely POV and not supported by any source. To post something in a template this extensive and exclusive at least make sure the guy is notable enough to have an article. Abu al-Mu'in al-Nasafi Abu al-Barakat al-Nasafi Muhammad al-Nasafi al-Makhuli Abu al-Qasim al-Hakim al-Samarqandi Abu al-Yusr al-Bazdawi Al-Kamal ibn al-Hammam Kamal al-Din Ahmad al-Bayadi all have red links, so I will remove them. If you think something should be in the template, make an article then include. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 04:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've undone the edits by TheDestroyer10 again. Per WP:BRD this needs to be discussed here. And it's certainly not a minor edit to restore a contested change to the template. Meters (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And again. Meters (talk) 05:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why did you suddenly change your mind & deleted all my edits Here? I will bring several sources for the names you have mentioned soon.--TheDestroyer10 (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I restored the template to its pre-war version when none of our were in play. Perhaps you can discuss your edits as to why they are needed. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Start by reading WP:TEMPLATE. This is a template. Any changes to it are immediately included in dozens of articles, so it's particularly important that any changes to it be agreed to by other editors. Adding redlinked articles to the template is definitely not a good idea. Once the articles are written the advisability of including them in the template can be discussed. Meters (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Here are the sources:
* Al-Maturidi and the Development of Sunni Theology in Samarqand by Ulrich Rudolph.
* Roots of Synthetic Theology in Islam: A Study of the Theology of Abu Mansur Al-Maturidi by Mustafa Ceric.
* The Canonization of al-Bukhr and Muslim by Jonathan Brown.
* Western Muslims and the Future of Islam - Page 45. 
* Istihsan: The Doctrine of Juristic Preference in Islamic Law by Saim Kayadibi.
* Theology and Creed in Sunni Islam by Jeffry R. Halverson.
* A study on Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and his controversies in Transoxiana by Fathalla Kholeif.
And you can also see this link (in Arabic)
--TheDestroyer10 (talk) 06:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  and what exactly does this show? What part of your contributions comes from which source? And just why should we include redlinks? Any rationale accroding to policy? FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Destroyer blocked as a sock. Meters (talk) 21:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent disruption 

message: the list contains too many irrelevant people like Muhammad al-Fatih (the conqueror of Constantinople) and Ali Ünal. In addition many names are on the Sufism template listed here.. They should be deleted68.100.166.209 (talk) 08:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhammad al-Fatih (the conqueror of Constantinople) 

message: Many of the names listed here, see * Notable early  * Notable modern should not be repeated on this Template:Aqidah. This is not the purpose of the template. Even these names are not listed explicitly on Template:Sufism but links are given like * Notable early  * Notable modern 68.100.166.209 (talk) 08:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  see [[Template:Sufism]]