Talk:Budweiser Gardens

message: Pending the response from Mr. Fraser at the Ontario Heritage Foundation/ Trust, I propose the disputed paragraph to read as follows:
: "No charges were ever laid against the City of London under the Ontario Heritage Act for the demolition. The Talbot Inn remained a designated heritage property for approximately 17 months after it was demolished."
The response from the OHF that I received in 2001 ("first in Ontario's history and possibly Canada's") may well have been referring to the improper use of a "heritage alteration permit" to outright demolish a designated heritage property. Barry Wells 20:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine to me. I will still post e-mail reply from OHF when I receive it. Barry Wells 00:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

text: That would be great! Does Skeezix1000 have any other contributions? Flibirigit 03:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The new language looks great!  Skeezix1000 13:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talbot Inn demolition

message: I'd still like to retain a portion of it being a first in Ontario/Canada history. How about this for the section? (changed areas in bold) Flibirigit 21:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine to me. I will still post e-mail reply from OHF when I receive it. Barry Wells 00:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

text: That would be great! Does Skeezix1000 have any other contributions? Flibirigit 03:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The new language looks great!  Skeezix1000 13:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Wording

message: If I can add a little bit to the other discussions, please remember that this article is about the John Labatt Centre - not the Ontario Heritage Act, not the Talbot Inn, and not anything else that comprises the history of the area or the city, or any laws or regulations that may have been broken.
It's great that the Talbot Inn incident was incuded in the article, and it's even better that it's being discussed by people who are passionate about what did or did not happen.  I just think the discussion and the many edits might possibly warrant the creation of a new article, specific to the Talbot Inn.
Beebolini 16:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Article Discussion 

message: :Image:Londonflag.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Londonflag.PNG

message: :Image:Londonflag.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Londonflag.PNG

message: :Image:Londonflag.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Londonflag.PNG

message: Would it be appropriate to make mention of some of the noteworthy events that have take place at the JLC? Examples might include the opening concert with Cher, the staging of Cirque du Soleil's first arena show (Saltimbanco), the videorecording of Meat Loaf's "Seize the Night" DVD... for instance. Also, the JLC has received an industry award for "best managed venue" from someone, but I would have to look that up. Just wondering if that type of content belongs in this type of article? 
Lyn (talk) 19:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venue uses & stature 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:John Labatt Centre - Talbot Inn corner.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I am concerned with the article's biased tone and that it has been hijacked by a member of the media for and editorial purpose. Flibirigit (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article written with excessive bias