lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:RFA Pearleaf (A77)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.historicalrfa.org/the-adventures-of-a-conway-lad-on-rfa-pearleaf-1977-78. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  16:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Michael Getler

message: Not sure exactly the criteria used, but shouldn't Michael Getler be identified as an American of Jewish ancestry?  I was in his bar mitzvah class at Hebrew school.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.146.74.192 (talk) 03:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: religious affiliation

message: I didn't write it, but checking out the link provided it does appear this individual is notable, even if this is a very (very) short stub. I will leave a note on the first author's talk to ask for expansion; in the meantime I'll try to expand this out to at least a second sentence. Cmprince 04:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hangon
Talk:Cowboy diplomacy

message: I'm wondering why this article seems to be mostly focused on George W. Bush, to the point that it is even in the category:George W. Bush. Maybe I'm and old guy, but "cowboy diplomacy" was the buzzword of the Reagan administration. Here's a Google news archive search if someone wants to do some research. I'm going to remove the Bush cat, as it makes this article POV. - Crockspot 04:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Reagan? 
Talk:UNLV Runnin' Rebels basketball

message: I'm going to take off the line that states "the turmoil was highly controversial and remains a hot button issue in las vegas to this day." I've lived in las vegas for almost ten years and nobody really cares, nor have i heard mention of this since i moved here. literraly nobody i know knows the name is jerry tarkanian court.
68.224.52.252 04:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Perth/3

message: slight issue, but everyone will be either arriving slightly early or slightly late. I'm happy to split a cab (or maxitaxi) depending on numbers from the City or Maylands with any other PT users. Thewinchester (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the route 43 timetables now that TP has taken the warning of interruptions and changes down. The Bus will either get you there for 12:00 or 2:30. Please indicate if you need assistance getting to the venue. I'll be able pick a couple people up on way there. Gnangarra 08:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If i attend, i will be able to take some passengers....if youre willing to put your life in the hands of a P-plater :) Just send me an email closer to the date Twenty Years 09:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transport

message: I know we all had a massive discussion about this before, but I might attend (unsure atm), and am underage (at that time i will be 17.5), if this causes problems for people i am more than willing not to attend, but i am just flagging my intention to attend here, and that if people are going to have an issue with that, to please leave a message here. Thanks all. Twenty Years 13:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to attend.  —Moondyne 07:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minors 

message: I'd be interested in attending. Powderbark2 03:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next meetup/Perth/4
Talk:Soling

message: I know what hiking is, having crewed on a 420, but what is 'droop-hiking' as mentioned in the lede? MinorProphet (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Droop hiking is when your knees are on the edge of the deck, your upper part of your legs are against the hull and your back horizontally. in dinghies like the 420 you use the trapeze or you do not hick that deep.Dragon Genoa (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation. I missed the pic further down which demonstrates the technique. So, some people just enjoy getting their ass wet. If I had a WP:Sock, it would be . My dad, who never managed to explain satisfactorily to me how the wind acted on a sail ended up with a 30-footer and quite how he managed not to drown himself and the rest of his unhappy crew is entirely beyond me. The RNLI have a tale or two to tell. MinorProphet (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiking
Talk:SS Curtiss

message: Yes the ship was built in 1968. Who was the true owner operator of the ship from 1968 to 1986. What is the role of United States Maritime Administration (MARAD)?  I do not really know the answer, but I feel certain that from 1968 to 1986 the ship's owner was not any portion of the U.S. Government. The ship might have been under contract for and provided services during this period to either the US DoD (Deparatment of Defense) or more specifically the US Navy MSC (Military Services Command). The ship probably had a mortgage on it, and the mortgage was insured back by a program of MARAD. (and that program stipulated a first offer/sale at a certain ship age to MARAD or DOD or MSC). 
Wfoj2 (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Quality/ Confusion
Talk:The Tooth of Crime

message: I can't help but feel that this misses the whole point. Hoss is not a musician in the slightest. This references one battle with Crow set to music, but being a Marker is not about music. I'd appreciate if someone who's a bit better at writing articles and is a Shepard fan cleans this up. 66.41.245.122 (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:XMPP Standards Foundation

message: Yet another time when I wish that MediaWiki was not so insistent that the only protocol in the world is HTTP.  Just *try* to fix the xmpp: link to jdev.
hildjj 04:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard operating procedure is making the link into something like Dave Smith, which will make it a redlink, or simply to delete the linkage. For a wonder, all links except Dave Smith seem correct - Dave Smith is a dabpage, I doubt the correct destination is Dave Smith (engineer), but there's not enough info here to tell. --Alvestrand (talk) 06:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:German submarine U-156 (1941)

message: KaptLt's Hartenstein's actions after the sinking of the Laconia would have a major effect on the course of submarine warfare for the rest of the war and should be mentioned at least in passing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.152.62.58 (talk) 22:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the "Laconia Incident"? 

message: The article says "Only one crewman was lost due to action with the enemy." The whole crew died when she was sunk by depthcharge. Was that encounter with a flying boat not "action with the enemy"? Moriori (talk) 02:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous

message: Amongst other copyedits, I've added 'or tampion' after 'plug' as that is another name for it (the plug) and changed the rather clumsy 'under the command of Werner Hartgenstein' to 'Werner Hartgenstein's command'. I'm still not happy with the intro as there is a lot of repeated info there (No. of ships sunk etc). What do other editors think?
RASAM (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Various
Talk:Celio (retailer)

message: This is what I do not get about wikipedia. It is all about how anyone can create articles if they are valid and sighted and this article is valid and sighted. And yet, for some reason, it only seems that people trust admins to do all of the editing. And i see sooooooooooooooo much uncited material which is just common sense, I mean you can;t sight every word, sometimes you just know things which is common general. But, I mean I do not see the reason for a speedy deletion tag. You know, every single edit seems to get reverted if it is not done by an admin. You know, evin if you are an admin, you don't know everything about everything and yet you feel like you have the right to delete this article. I saw that a Celio article was missing and Celio is a fairly big European chain. I do not see the logic. --Lollypoplollypopohlollylollylolly 04:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your article is cited with some sources, yes, but not any secondary sources.  Wikipedia has strict policies about notability, especially for companies.  In my opinion, for good reason.  Review those, and if the article can meet the criteria, then of course it deserves to stay.  Regards, Iknowyourider (t c) 05:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You asked me about secondary sources on my talk page -- please read the article I linked to (secondary sources).  If you're willing to spend a few minutes reading, then things will make a lot more sense.  Regards, Iknowyourider (t c) 18:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of people from Fort Lauderdale, Florida

message: Okay, since this got tagged with uncited about 25 minutes after its creation, I spent several hours finding references to 33 of the 36 people on this list. I have found sources for the other three but they are either not reliable (Daisy Berkowitz), not clear if they are actually live in Fort Lauderdale (The Rock) or not suitable for family viewing (Mary Carey). If anyone can come up with some appropriate cites for these three people, have at it. Horologium t-c 04:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Horologium, I will look and see what I can find. The one that bothers me is Chris Evert. She lives in Boca Raton which of course is not Lauderdale. I think she should be removed from this list. If you even look at her Wikipedia page it references her in Boca. Something to think about. Junebug52 11:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I scanned the article and see she was actually born in Lauderdale. Well I am trying to whittle this thing down LOL. I know for a fact that The Rock is not a Lauderdale resident. He owns a home in a surrounding area but actually makes his home in California. He was recently divirced and left Florida. I could not find a clear cite source that could place him in the area either. Junebug52 11:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted over at the Fort Lauderdale, Florida talk page, everything is now cited, and another name was removed. Between Junebug52's initial scrubbing before the information was moved to the new page, my reference research last night, and the deeper digging done by Legionarius, we have something that is both accurate and sourced. I'm not sure how comprehensive it is; however, the list is not hermetically sealed, and additions are relatively easy to make. Horologium t-c 14:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cited, need three more
Talk:Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.

message: This article should not be deleted. This company is a major player in its industries. Bell motorcycle, race car and bicycle helmets; Riddell football helmets; and Easton hockey sticks are all familiar brands, and therefore noteworthy. The Motorcycle category includes accessory manufacturers.
Not blatant advertising. No hyperbole. Yeah, it's just a stub; yeah, it needs work; no, I am not going to do the work. But it isn't spam and should not be deleted. 
I would not object to the links being deleted.Ronstew 05:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Which Witch

message: Shouldn't this article cover some of drama that occured around the time when the production flopped brutally in London?  --Bjs5005 (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely agree, the article is ridiculously positive and portrays the musical as a huge artistic and commercial success, while here in the UK at least it is a byword for an ill-conceived and disastrous production. Much of the English in the article has a certain 'Scandinavian' phrasing to it and I can't help suspecting that the original producers or their associates have something to do with it. --80.176.142.11 (talk) 17:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbalanced Article

message: I came to this page looking for info on the 1970s kids' board game. Could be worth a disambiguation page, at least.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.71.240.116 (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be a disambig, with links to Which Witch? (play) and Which Witch (game).  They should NOT both be lumped in the same article. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Not objective at all. What about all the fight between Adrian and Bjørnov and the financial trouble, the bankrupcy? Edit or delete. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not objective
Talk:Northeast Counter-Japanese United Army

message: Removed this from text:
" This army many many heroic events, more than any part of China during the Sino-Japanese war. One of the examples is a woman called Zhao Yiman, who is still revered by many Chinese now. "
Has not been supported now for a long time now with a bio of Zhao Yiman or any one else. It also sounds like some propaganda pronouncement, not a fit with an attempt at an objective article on the subject.Asiaticus (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is written from POV of mainland China. If sources outside of mainland China doesn't mention Northeast Anti-Japanese United Army, it could be that it's not significant in WWII, and is mostly promoted by CCP for propaganda, thus seems out of proportion in China. I'd like to see citation of reliable source outside China that would refute this hypothesis.
For one thing, I've not heard of Northeast Anti-Japanese United Army when I was in Taiwan, though I graduated from the best school in Taiwan. A Google search on .tw domain would show that books about it are published by mainland China, and not by Taiwan. Thus I remove the reference about Taiwan. --Happyseeu (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issue
Talk:Bidwill, New South Wales/APR

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?]
*Please convert tables from HTML syntax to Help:Table wiki-markup.
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) There is and it is in use ("suburb infobox" used in this article is not a template as such)
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?]
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
**it has been
**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] 
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Garrie 05:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Entertainment One Films US

message: Why include a link to the Koch official site? The text here is already a direct lift from it. PacificBoy 05:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:St. Michael's Tower, Glastonbury

message: St. Michael's Tower is worthy of more thorough discussion at Wikipedia, but encyclopedic coverage suggests  that it would not help the reader to divorce the Tower from its setting, as would be the case in two dictionary entries. "Dictionary thinking" divides every subject into the smallest possible pieces. Contextual information is lost thereby.--Wetman 05:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Republic of Vietnam Marine Division

message: As anyone read this book that can footnote some history and information of the Republic of Vietnam Marine Corps.
* History of the Vietnamese Marine Corps, Army of the Republic of Viet Nam (ISBN: 0-646-31188-3) by Colonel Mr. Chung Van Pham.
Bnguyen 05:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the Vietnamese Marine Corps, Army of the Republic of Viet Nam
Talk:Family Classics

message: When did Family Classics ever show The Magnificent Seven?  It was always a late (usually Friday) night thingFoofbun (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Magnificent Seven
Talk:Day-fine

message: The article discusses the issue almost as if it only existed in Finland; it just mentions that a similar system is in use in at least three other countries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.70.16 (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only in Finland 

message: In France, the jour-amende is not proportional to the income. It's a fixed amount, decided by the judge, and cannot exceed 1000 euros by day, along with other limitations. Having it mentioned in this page is misleading.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teocali (talk • contribs) 08:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not proportional to income in France 

message: See these reliable sites for use by native English speakers: , , 
Google Scholar results:
181 for "day fine system
64 for "unit fine system
use on UK and US university sites:
17 hits for "day fine" scandinavia site:edu
7 for "unit fine" scandinavia site:edu
3 from ac.uk for "day fine" scandinavia
0 from ac.uk for "unit fine" scandinavia --Espoo (talk) 20:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I favor a merge and though I am not a native speaker I favor day-fine over unit-fine.  Steinberger (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that "Day-fine" is most straightforward and popular nomenclature for the merge.  MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 04:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Yuanyang County, Yunnan

message: While it can be said that the county is beautiful, phrases such as “-overwhelming scenic beauty of its landscape and colourful local minorities” come off as too targeted and not neutral. Your real son (talk) 06:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased language
Talk:Vol. II (Hurt album)

message: User TheJazzDalek has removed album reviews claiming that they are non-pro reviews per WP:ALBUMS. "Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs)."
*Ultimate-Guitar reviews are classified as Non-professional reviews under the guidelines.
*Tunelab Music reviews appear to qualify for inclusion because they are an online publication with a writing staff and appear to be independent of the artists, record companies, etc.
*Type 3 Media reviews appear to qualify for inclusion because they are an online publication with a writing staff and appear to be independent of the artists, record companies, etc.
Need consensus on the above before they should be re-added to the page. Zclone (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Reviews
Talk:Ferdinand J. Chesarek

message: I would be glad to see his years of promotion somewhere in the article. "In November 1943, GENERAL Chesarek went to the European Theater of Operations to become Commanding Officer of the 28th Field Artillery Battalion." He was certainly not a general when he commanded a battalion! In 1943, five years after he had become 2nd Lieutenant, his rank was probably not higher than that of a captain. LukGasz (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranks?
Talk:Jeff Greenfield

message: I'd like to see more information on Greenfield's work as a journalist. I added information on criticism he received due to his coverage on healthcare in relation to Michael Moore's documentary, 'Sicko,' as well as quotes from Greenfield's response to that criticism. I hope others find this helpful and that more people will contribute information regarding Greenfield's work. 
Here is a copy of what exactly I added:
"He has also received criticism from progressive groups such as FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) for his coverage of healthcare in the United States. While discussing Michael Moore's documentary "Sicko," on a June 22, 2007, edition of CBS Evening News, Greenfield criticized Moore's proposals for healthcare reform, saying that "no one [presidential candidates], Democrat or Republican, has come close to advocating the kind of government-run national health system Michael Moore proposes," because "Americans are just different" and do not want that type of system. FAIR countered that Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D.-Ohio), a presidential candidate, endorsed that particular option for healthcare, as did other members of Congress supporting HR 676. They also cited recent polls that found widespread support from Americans, inclduing a CNN poll conducted May 4 - 6, 2007, in which 64% of those asked agreed that "government should provide a national health insurance program for all Americans, even if this would require higher taxes."[2] Greenfield responded to the criticism in a post on the CBS website. He wrote that Moore's proposal is not for a single-payer system, but a "government run system in which doctors work for the government," and that FAIR was "comparing apples and oranges; actually, apples and bowling balls is more like it."[3][4]"
Langtry (talk) 16:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information on Greenfield's work 

message: Every time I see a one of his reports (usually on the PBS News Hour), it is ALWAYS from Santa Barbara. If not his primary home, it's certainly a seasonal home.   Ed (talk) 05:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  His home
Talk:Milton (cartoon)

message: Are these shorts available anywhere?
70.88.213.74 (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can get shorts at Old Navy. 2600:1700:6EB0:80E0:4D01:C87E:9D27:BF1E (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled