lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leslie Harvey

message: According to The 27s: The Greatest Myth of Rock & Roll author Eric Segalstad, Leslie Harvey was not a 27.
Segalstad acquired a copy of his death certificate, and according to the date of birth on it he was actually 26.
EzraZebra (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If the birth and death dates in this article are accurate, he was 27. If they are inaccurate, they should be corrected. Who's got a source? Dcs002 (talk) 02:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: I have removed the excessive detail on the final paragraph. The quotation from Dr John's book is a borderline copyright violation and could easily be trimmed down, the detail is excessive for a neutral and balanced biography, and the specific cause of death contradicts the NME source, which reports he was electrocuted while announcing a number, not playing a song. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death 
Talk:Administrative divisions of Penza Oblast

message: As far as I understand, Spassk was renamed Bednodemyanovsk in 1925 . Conscious 19:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and back to Spassk in 2000.  Ain't I an annoying know-it-all? :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's a wiki :P I wonder why they have it wrong at the 2002 census site :( Conscious 20:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Now I see that it was renamed back in 2005 . Conscious 20:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about the confusion; I hit the wrong digit.  2005 it is.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 21:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spassk
Talk:Azhagiya Tamil Magan

message: Work starting now... If you have any requests please leave it on my userpage.~~ AVTN T CVPS 19:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up & citing article. 

message: ...a disaster. The title is one thing, the infobox title says another, and the image (apart from having, from what I can tell of Tamil Nadu, only two words) is unsourced. Add the image to the title issues and we have a big annoyance. If nothing else, can someone post the exact name of the article, as transliterated (and as translated, if possible) from Tamil to English? It would be a start... Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 20:45, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is... 

message: From the "About us" page: http://www.earthtimes.org/disclaimer.php
"The news and opinions published on this site, www.earthtimes.org are written, submitted and posted by autonomous, independent reporters" .."The author listed for each article is solely responsible for the content of items submitted. The directors, officers, managers, editors or any staff member of the Earth Times and Earthtimes.org organization assume no responsibility nor accept liability for the content of any article" - ie - no editorial oversite -  there is no indication the site has a reputation for fact checking and accuracy; in essence just a blog. MM209.86.226.56 (talk) 17:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earthtimes.org is not a [[WP:RS]] 
Talk:Balle Balle

message: The article claims to be about a song from Bride and Prejudice. However the term "Balle Balle" has more to it than being just lyrics of a song. The term is quite popular in Punjabi and that aspect is not seen in the article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  11:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Dicrocoelium dendriticum

message: Zebadiahjones (talk) 23:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *That's a legitimate objection. I'm trying to find some sources to substantiate it. Heck, some sources for ANYTHING. This whole article is on a well-documented organism, but inexplicably sourceless. I'd freely encourage you or anyone else to feel free to axe that section if nobody (including me) succeeds at sourcing it. Might be OR. - Vianello (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecological Role

message: ...is gone from the web. I cannot find this anywhere. Just reporting. Vinne2 (talk) 08:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  5th ref (to CUP) 

message: This article needs to be expanded to include brain worm in the wild and its effect on wildlife (like moose). Here are some sources I ran across while briefly looking into the parasite:
* http://www.pgc.pa.gov/Wildlife/Wildlife-RelatedDiseases/Pages/BrainWorm.aspx
* https://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/72211.html
* http://www.wildlife.state.nh.us/wildlife/moose/index.html
* https://extension.unh.edu/resources/files/Resource003858_Rep5484.pdf
* http://nrri.d.umn.edu/moose/information/brainworm.html
* https://www.mprnews.org/story/2018/02/16/mystery-of-minnesota-disappearing-moose-closer-to-being-solved
* http://www.wtip.org/researcher-finds-public-support-study-brainworm-transmission-moose
* https://wolfwatcher.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Moose-Brain-worm.pdf
— Molly-in-md (talk) 19:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand with wildlife
Talk:Roll of arms

message: I do not believe the above demerger should have taken place and that it should now be reverted to re-consolidate the article Roll of arms. The article Roll of arms was only a very short article and there was no need for a demerger. It has been shorn of its relevant detail and the new article is turning into a parallel article, developing a longer and longer intro, whilst the original article is developing its own list of rolls. A mess. Comments please. (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I viewed both articles, and consider the separation of the topic and list to be beneficial. To expand the article Roll of arms further, I expect it will become less British Isles centered probably through cross connection with similarly titled articles in other languages. There seems to be a continuity threads that have not been developed regarding military use, class-defining function, the natural fade in relevance in most republics, etc. In sum the article Roll of arms is start class because it is so sparse. I have great respect for Lobsterthermidor as I encounter his excellent work and improvements from time to time; remerging may make less work by allowing edits to be within one article rather than between articles. Yet removing the bulky List of rolls of arms may allow natural growth in the article Roll of arms by keeping External links and other elements. So my suggestion is to "wait and see" for a few years, while moving content from List of roll of arms to Roll of arms when appropriate68.32.154.213 (talk) 16:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I fear that what will happen is that we will have parallel expansion in both, with the "list" article's intro growing, and the original article's list growing. This will therefore require solving by a merger later down the line. The section "Known historical examples", is surely a list, why wasn't this  split-off into the new "list article"? It's a bit of a mess. Your point re "British Isles centered" is a good one and suggests to me that it is now time to create a new article on English rolls so that the topic can be developed more freely. This might encourage those with a primary interest in non-English rolls to develop those areas too. On my to do list.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert demerger to [[List of rolls of arms]]
Talk:Brihaddeshi

message: Prem Lata Sharma actually edited 2 volumes of Brhaddesi; you list the first one only.  The second one was published in 1994, and is much harder to get ahold of. I think the 2nd vol is pretty cool, because Matanga put sample Sargam notation in for lots of the bhasas. Anyway, someone should add more info. Emilysue Reichardt 96.81.218.61 (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Sharma's edition
Talk:C. Ramchandra

message: This article's list is improperly formatted, it feels like it was written by a fan with peacock language being used throughout, and also has very few citations. This article needs to be cleaned up or rewritten.
Seabass715 (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Kipps

message: As this is the English language version of Wikipedia, perhaps the person who contributed "حيوان" to this talk page from a UAE address could offer a translation from the Arabic? The Google translator offers "animal" or "become acquainted", neither of which is very enlightening. --Mabzilla (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "حيوان"? 

message: Is it Walshingham or Walsingham? Snugglepuss (talk) 15:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Battle of Cerro Corá

message: Everyone involved in this page should feel ashamed. It's unintelligible. Too many names and not nearly enough background!!
Taken from the page telling about Francisco Solano Lopez:. "López was at last driven with a mere handful of troops to the northern frontier of Paraguay, where, in the Battle of Cerro Corá on 1 March 1870, he was surprised by a Brazilian force and killed by a grenadier as he tried to escape by swimming the river Aquidaban."
I believe this page contains 
I am removing the last part since it contains Revisionst lies.  88.113.150.181 00:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Chatrapathi (2005 film)

message: This article is almost class start. If reception (box office) gets a bit more developed, please reassess to start. Hoverfish Talk 08:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.idlebrain.com/movie/postmortem/chatrapati.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dpmuk (talk) 00:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Chittoor Subramaniam Pillai

message: This article has 7 days to improve before I start the deletion process. The Kinslayer 14:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 
Talk:Content negotiation

message: * I am not the original submitter of the content in question.
* I haven't even checked whether the material does copy from Apache's documentation.
However - Apache's license is explicit in stating that content may be redistributed, modified, etc. (similar to GFDL), so long as we mention that some content may come from Apache's original documentation.  I'm wondering how this can be a copyright infringement on a clearly open, uncopyrighted document with a generally GFDL/GPL compatible license.  Administrators: Please consider this, or remove the CopyVio tag.  Thanks, Nimur 20:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the key is this: "so long as we mention that some content may come from Apache's original documentation." The original submitter didn't bother to do that. It *is* a copyvio if it doesn't comply with the license. I actually don't see any copyright or licensing information at all on the page from which the content was copied. I guess what we need is this: (1) If the page from which the content was copied is under the Apache license, we need someone to find where it says that. (2) We then need to comply with the license, which we aren't currently doing. --24.52.254.62 00:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like these issues have been addressed; therefore I'm removing the strikethrough. Verisimilus T 19:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Status 

message: >> One classical use of this mechanism is to serve an image in GIF or PNG format, so that a browser that cannot display PNG images (e.g. MS Internet Explorer 4) will be served the GIF version.
What are we, in 1997? These days SVGs are are used instead of PNGs for IE8+  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.80.1.253 (talk) 20:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 15-year old info
Template talk:Ranma ½

message: After considering a sugestion made by an anon, I suggest a Major Adversaries section to be added. Since Saffron, Ryu Kumon and Herb don't fit in other categories, that new section which would allow those characters to be in the template.Facer 20:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also should consider Tsubasa in here somewhere. Derekloffin 20:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Lol, you beat me to adding the major adversaries section to the template (I was waiting for the 4 weeks period mentioned in the wikirules), but it's all cool. By the way, Mariko is a major adversary, but I'll add a comment on that here later tonight (I'm at the office right now). Good job anyway.Facer 20:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding new category to template

message: Going by the manga, I believe a character should be considered a major adversary if he/she:
*Appears only once.
*Helps to move the overall story forward.
*Has an entire story-arc devoted to him/her.
*Is more powerful than the members of the regular cast or those involved in the story.
I think it’s obvious why Pantyhose Taro belongs here, even if he appeared more than once in the manga.
Herb and Saffron are also obvious.
Mariko is not only the strongest female opponent Ranma has to defeat using only his girl form, and her story-arc helped move the overall story a little, by accidentally forcing Ranma to declare her love for Akane in front of the whole school (in the anime, this was also the story-arc where Ranma’s curse is revealed to all the school.)
I really don’t think that Ryu Kumon is really more powerful than Ranma, Ryoga and Mousse (but I admit he’s a cool character), however, his fighting style gives him a great advantage, and his story-arc helped bring Ranma closer to Nodoka, so he qualifies as a major adversary.
Rouge should be here as well, she has a full story-arc devoted to herself and her cursed form is more powerful than the regular cast.Facer 03:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major adversaries
Talk:Spooks Run Wild

message: It may be noted that the cast list, along with character names, is depicted in the film's opening credits. For the record, below is a reproduction of the form in which the cast is listed:
MONOGRAM        M        PC PICTURES
MONOGRAM PICTURES CORPORATION                     PRESENTS               BELA LUGOSI                    in            Spooks Run Wild                       WITH   LEO GORCEY and BOBBY JORDAN                       FEATURING                      HUNTZ HALLCOPYRIGHT MCMXLI by MONOGRAM PICTURES CORPORATION
                       Associate Producer                      PETE MAYEROriginal Story and Screenplay by CARL FOREMAN                                             CHARLES R. MARIONAdditional Dialogue . . . . . . JACK HENLEYAssistant Director . . . . . . ART HAMMONDProduction Manager . . . . . . . . ED W. ROTEPhotography . . . . MARCEL LE PICARD, A.S.C.Film Editor . . . . . . . . ROBERT GOLDEN (film editor)Settings . . . . . . . . . . FRED PREBLERecording . . . . . . . . . GLEN GLENN (sound engineer)                    Musical Directors         LANGE & PORTER, A.S.C.A.P.
                     CastNardo . . . . . . . . . . BELA LUGOSIMuggs . . . . . . . . . . . LEO GORCEYDanny . . . . . . . . . . BOBBY JORDANGlimpy . . . . . . . . . . . HUNTZ HALLScruno . . . SUNSHINE SAMMY MORRISONJeff Dixon . . . . . . . . DAVID O'BRIEN (actor, born 1912)Linda Mason . . . . . . DOROTHY SHORTPeewee . . . . . . . . . . DAVID GORCEYSkinny . . . . . . . . . DONALD HAINESDr. Von Grosch . . . . . . DENNIS MOORE (actor)Lem Harvey . . . . . . . . . P.J. KELLEYLuigi . . . . . . . . . ANGELO ROSSITTOConstable . . . . . . . . GUY WILKERSON
                                                                                                               Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Character names are indicated in the opening credits
Talk:Homebrewing beer

message: The "Full Mash" section contains an error in the description of mash temp & pH for α-amylase vs. β-amylase.   The paragraph says that β-amylase produces fermentable sugars and prefers higher temperature and higher (more alkaline) pH, and that α-amylase produces non-fermentable dextrins and prefers lower temp & pH; but then it goes on to say "the hotter and more alkaline the mash, the drier and more alcoholic the final beer; the cooler and more acidic the mash, the sweeter and thicker".
This is contradictory because "drier and more alcoholic" implies the wort had more fermentable sugars and less dextrins, which the preceeding text says is produced by α-amylase, which (it says) prefers cooler and more acidic conditions.
I suspect the mistake is that β-amylase is the main producer of fermentable sugars, not α-amylase, and β is denatured at a LOWER temp than α-amylase (65°C for β vs. 70+°C for α).  Therefore a cooler and more alkaline mash should produce drier and more alcoholic beer, and usually the temperature is all that matters (both α and β tolerate pH 5.0-6.0).
Will some expert chime in and/or fix the text?   It is clearly inconsistent, but I don't have enough personal experience to warrant changing the text myself.   The information I provided above is based on John Palmer's "How to Brew" book (Ch. 14 "How Mashing Works").  The online version is at http://www.howtobrew.com .
Here is a quote from Palmer:
A lower mash temperature, less than or equal to 150°F [65°C], yields a thinner bodied, drier beer. A higher mash temperature, greater than or equal to 156°F [69°C], yields a less fermentable, sweeter beer. 
Thanks.  Jimavera (talk) 23:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Full Mash section's rule of thumb re. temp & pH 
Talk:Dholak

message: Discussion Do you have any strong opinions about the factuality or implications of the material presented in this wiki article? If so, please contribute. One contributor here would like to start a thread of conversation about the possibility of the phrases/terms 'being on the dole' and/or a person or the weather 'being in the doldrums' having their origin somehow connected with the dholak. What do you think? Is there any such basis in historical evidence and/or rhetorical etymology? How would you say has Indian and/or British society inculcated these terms with subjective qualities, either negative or condescending in their implications toward Indian folkloric drummers (e.g. did the expression "to dole out" [money] have a related origin)? Has such terminology either in literature or widespread casual-usage (vernacular) conversation contributed to strong negative social stereotypes (especially in relation to folkloric musicians and dancers) that persist? Can you cite written evidence?
--dr.alf (talk) 22:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from main article page:
Talk:Mabel Taliaferro

message: * (Theatre Magazine, June 1908).--Milowent • talkblp-r 16:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit late this, but I've restored the section deleted in 2017, with editing and an additional cite. The original single cite from 2017 was misformatted, which was possibly why the section was removed.Saratoga Sam (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source with additional pictures.
Talk:Sun Valley Serenade

message: Sun Valley Serenade was broadcast many times on AMC in the 1990s, guys.  Do your research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.26.8 (talk) 03:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMC 

message: This would need sourcing before it could be added, but watching the Chatanooga Choo Choo segment, it's pretty clear the portion featuring Dandridge and the Nicholas Brothers was designed so as to be easily cut out if required in locales where the footage would be disallowed (there is no indication of the train set piece in the first part of the number, for example). Does anyone know if this was indeed the case? I recall Lena Horne in That's Entertainment III saying something to the effect that her MGM numbers were usually formatted in such a way that they could be excised from the films. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 06:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dandridge/Nicholas section of Choo Choo
Talk:Doreswamy Iyengar

message: Does the V. in his name stands for Veena ??? --Pascal Boulerie (talk) 10:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pascal Boulerie, V in his name stands for Venkatesha. Reference: Link. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 12:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  V. ? (issue solved - V. standing for Venkatesha) 
Talk:Ektara

message: Let's develop this article. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No taker!!! Aditya(talk • contribs) 12:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's develop 
Talk:Faiyaz Khan

message: Ustad faiyaz Khan has a adopted child in Baroda,Gujrat. Name: Bakar Hussain khan. I'm the grandson of ustad faiyaz Khan. 2409:4041:CEB7:8620:EDB7:73B:A040:6D5C (talk) 20:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ustad faiyaz Khan has a adopted child in Baroda,Gujrat. Name: Bakar Hussain khan.
Talk:Stick bass

message: Man, what is it about bass instruments?  There's this issue, the "bass guitar vs. electric bass" argument, and even students of the double bass argue about whether it's a violin or a viol.  Are we bottom-feeders cursed or something? 64.171.68.130 19:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We are certainly baser animals than any other musicians. 8-)--Light current 22:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The pun is the lowest form of humor? :P 64.171.68.130 23:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. Its my favorite. Must be cos Im a bass player!--Light current 23:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bass nomenclature inherently controversial?