Talk:Dark River (Warriors)

message: The cover has appeared so could someone post the picture here? I posted the link. 76.27.108.99 21:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cover! 

message: :Image:DarkRiver.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DarkRiver.png

message: I saw the AfD notice and when it said to click on Dark Rivers' entry, it led to the Fire And Ice AfD entry instead.Iceberg2229 (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect AfD Link 

message: Can someone with an understanding of the book and fixing grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors and just rewrite the entire thing? It needs to look like The Sight's page.Wolfhorse (talk) 00:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Someone added to the Other section that Heatherpaw was on the cover. I also noticed that someone reverted it. The cover information is in the Sunset (Warriors) and The Sight (Warriors) articles, and I'm pretty sure it belongs in this one. Does anyone have any objections? If not, I'm going to put it back into the article. Epass (talk) 19:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has also been suggested that Fallen Leaves is on the cover. If someone could find a notable website saying who is on the cover, please post the link here. It would give this article another reference and all the other Warriors articles already have who is on the cover, so Dark River would match. Epass (talk) 11:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Cover 

message: I've removed the plot section which was way too specific and cluttered the article.  Please talk here about what should and should not be added to an future plot sections in this article.  Thanks, Metros (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the plot still is in need of trimming. Try to reduce it to the essentials. Shrewpelt (talk) 02:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Who deleted the opening paragraph? The little bit that is left looks unsightingly short, and it gives no backround knowledge of the Warriors series. If someone has a good reason though, it's okay. Epass (talk) 11:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody responds I'll put it back in. Epass (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Going once, going twice. If nobody responds soon it is going back in. Epass (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it's going back in. (I'm not very patient, am I?) Epass (talk) 15:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  first paragraph 

message: I, personally, don't really like the Secrets section on the article, it's all really part of the plot. Does anyone have anything to say about this? For now, I'll leave it, but it annoys me. IceUnshattered (talk) 14:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sight's article has a talents section, and it's just like the secrets'. It may be mentioned earlier in the article, but it is convenient to the readers to have all the info in one place. So, the way I see it, if it helps someone, and it hurts no one, it should be left in. But feel free to disagree. Epass (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Secrets' section? 

message: I have gotten proof that Heatherpaw is on the Cover of the book. Go to http://www.warriorcats.com and watch the video. When you get to WindClan, the cat on the cover of Dark River appears! So that means it  is Heatherpaw, because she is in WindClan. Epass (talk) 12:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not really proof per Wikipedia's standards.  That qualifies as original research.  What you're saying is "because the video shows this, and this one character does this, then, it's this we think".  What we need is a source that says "X is Y" without any necessary conclusions being drawn.  Also, is Heatherpaw the only cat in WindClan?  How can we conclude it's Heatherpaw and not Bobfoot or Jasonhead or Razorsharp?  Metros (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you are right, although Heatherpaw is the only WindClan cat with any importance in the story. Anyone could see that it is Heatherpaw, but I guess that to Wikipedia, it's OR, even if it is not original research and Common Sense instead. Epass (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Yeah, well, that's not significant proof. You need an author or the website to specifically announce that it is them on the cover. ~ Bella Swan? 00:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof