lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Birkebeiner

message: The article uses a mixture of spellings, probably reflecting the differing spelling in the Nordic languages.  Which is the one normally used in English?  I wouldn't want to assume that the skiing events' spelling of -er is necessarily the right one. --JBellis 19:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Birkebeiner is Norwegian bokmål and Birkebeinar is Norwegian nynorsk. What is most common in English? Good question. I've seen birchlegs and birchshanks as well.--Barend 14:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birkebeiner or Birkebeinar? 

message: Hello, Not sure of the process but can you please add the Canadian Birkebeiner Society website as a link in this page?
Under the Birkebeiner Run heading:
...sister cross country skiing events... in Edmonton (Canada) (The Canadian Birkebeiner) with the link of:
www.canadianbirkie.com
75.155.20.106 (talk) 19:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. It seems like there is already a link to that website, because it has been cited as a reference (#8). Therefore, it doesn't seem necessary to add another link in the body paragraph. Altamel (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: COI edit request on September 3

message: Suggestion for some editor(s) who know(s) far more about these topics than I do:  
All three articles need work and overlap each other extensively. While cleaning them up, merge into it the two articles Birkebeiner and Bagler, cleaning up the lacks of citations and resolving any contradictions between the three articles.  (E.g., were or were not the Baglers peasants?) Then, delete the Birkebeiner and Bagler articles. Acwilson9 (talk) Acwilson9 (talk) 04:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Birkebeiner]] and [[Bagler]] articles into [[Civil war era in Norway]] article
Talk:40.6 cm SK C/34 gun

message: In the norwegian article is states that the guns at Trondenes were last fired in 1956, her it says 1957.................  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.10.131 (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states both 2 min/shell and 2 shell/min firing rates. OOZ662 (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of Fire?
Talk:Knut Haukelid

message: Twins are born the same day!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.97.183.185 (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly speaking, this is too trivial to bother with, but I'll do it anyway: Twins may actually be born in different years, if they are born each side of a specific midnight... Autokefal Dialytiker (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he born the day before his twin sister? 
Talk:Study of Traditionalism

message: I've made this as factual as possible as I don't want to start a row. But since my critics have been posting links to a review that is frankly libellous, I thought a one sentence defense would not be out of order. Hope you all agree. Mark Sedgwick 12:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy and Sedgwick's defense
Talk:Ahlcon Public School

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 05:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:Al Jamea tus Saifiyah

message: WHAT does "Tus" MEAN?
128.164.157.184 (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tus 

message: The correct spelling for this institution is Aljamea-tus-Saifiyah. Hence, I've created a page with that spelling and redirect to that.Muffizainu (talk) 14:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: TITLE & REDIRECT
Talk:Peter Gallagher

message: can anyone supply a better photo of this (rather gorgeous) man? riana 12:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Gallagher specializes in character parts which are, to varying degrees, either good or bad guys" 
- Thats a really strange thing to say. It's just stating that he's an actor. You could say the same about any actor who's played good and bad guys - and thats a lot.
Tommyhaych 15:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get this.. 

message: If they ever make a movie about Peter Gallagher, Johnathon Schaech is the doppleganger. Chris (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lookalikes
Talk:East Java

message: please correct 40,000,000 pepole
:(Referring to a missing zero in the population.) Done. Wmahan. 03:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states that 18% of the population of some 34 millions is Madurese. Yet it also says that 15 millions of the total population are Madurese. Meursault2004 (talk) 13:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies re Madurese 
Talk:Attenborough Building

message: It's not anywhere near the tallest: although its top might have the highest altitude, given the hill.  It's 50 something metres compared to the 80 something metres of Cardinal Telephone Exchange and St George's Tower.  Much of the rest was obviously nonsense and that which wasn't was unreliable considering lack of sourcing and that the same person who added the nonsense added it.  So nuked it all.  Morwen - Talk 12:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have a reference for it being the tallest in the UK? What about the one in Sheffield? I've removed it for the moment. JRawle (Talk) 23:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paternoster height
Talk:Grant Nicholas

message: Colaberations does anyone know anything about his version of "you dont see the signs" with mark b and blade? Swedishdave 13:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ned Sherrin

message: "Ned Sherrin is notably mentioned in Douglas Adams' fifth novel of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, namely Mostly Harmless. In chapter four it says that Tricia McMillan wishes to "gradually fall asleep to the sound of Ned Sherrin being terribly clever about something"."
Just saying that something is notable doesn't make it so.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.157.239.6 (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article doesn't state that he is openly gay - why is he in this category listing?
: Because he is. --62.255.236.92 03:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay?
Talk:Dhirubhai Ambani International School

message: I have recreated and expanded the article. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreated 

message: Hi Nicolas. I made minor edits. I am from DAIS.
Parmeet.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 221.134.196.202 (talk) 16:28, August 22, 2007 (UTC) 
hahaha brilliant last edit....
hello ...it is ridiculous to claim that sachin tendulkar, SRK and others were students in this school!!! please get the facts right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.71.12.137 (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits
Talk:Faculty of Management Studies – University of Delhi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 08:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: As per convention and WP:NLIST Notable Alumni Sections only list those with actual articles and with reliable sources confirming attendance. Mtking (edits)  21:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni Section
Talk:Battle of Hjörungavágr

message: I found a bunch of such images here. A minor point: It might be a bit confusing when the text uses both meanings of the word legendary. It states that the battle is "semi-legendary" meaning that the descriptions of it are at least partially fictous, but it also mentions the "legendary Jomsvikings" not in the sense that they are totally made up i hope :). That could benefit from a slight rewording, or am I way off here? Inge 12:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it's a tricky word and I've used it carelessly. Both the Jomsvikings and the battle have some historical basis - please reword to make that clear :) Haukur 12:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to fabled, but I'm not completely satisfied with that word either. Inge 12:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image and more 

message: See e.g. here: https://skaldic.org/db.php?id=1500&if=default&table=text
There is no ö in Old Norse, that's just a 'second-best' rendition of ǫ in some print editions due to technical restrictions, and it's ambiguous, because it could also stand for ON ø. And it wasn't an ø in this word - the environment clearly shows that the vowel is the product of u-umlaut and not i-umlaut. The Mainland Scandinavian fronting of ǫ after /j/ is a later process, and the later Icelandic general fronting of ǫ is not part of normalised ON either, of course. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 11:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be renamed to Hjǫrungavágr
Talk:Prillar-Guri

message: Title of article is spelled "Prillar..."  Instrument is descrbed as a "prillar," yet in the rest of the article and the lead, the spelling is "Pillar."  So is she "PrillarGuri" or PillarGuri?"  Sir Rhosis (talk) 03:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Prillar or Pillar
Talk:Mike Dillon (musician)

message: I created the page because someone created pasted this artist over the page from NASCAR driver Mike Dillon (a disambiguous conflict). I am unfamilar with this artist. I checked for notability with a google search, and the top link was  this link that shows he is currently doing a national tour of the United States, which meets the notability criteria for musicians. Royalbroil 13:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Mae Nak Phra Khanong

message: This article needs a summary of the story in question. -- P199 13:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand article
Talk:County constituency

message: Confused....
So all registered candidates can claim that cash, whenever there is a general (or by-) election due ?  Even candidates of no-hoper parties ?  And who monitors that these government handouts are actually spent on the purpose for which the money is intended (which, I wonder, is precisely what....I doubt if the "spending rules" here - if there are any - are tightly drawn as to be anything but meaningless).
: No, these are the spending rules - the candidates don't receive the money from the government. The money comes from the political parties etc. in the usual way.
: James F. (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Navy Children School, Delhi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:HNoMS Start

message: What is the source for this being a KNM (HNoMS)? The same source that has the first flight at 31 May and Dons as a secondløytnant? Paaln (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 
Talk:Brad McQuaid

message: Where's Brad from anyway?
Energist 15:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Animation software

message: Should we split this into an "open source" and "proprietary" secion? i.e Remove this page and create an "Open Source Animation Software" and "Proprietary Animation Software", and to save the hassle of editing alot of redirects turning this page into "There are several types of Animation software:" Then do a list of the types, pointing to relevant catagory pages. And then say, "Or for a complete list of all animation software".
What do you guys think? Help plz 13:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a problem with creating the two new categories mentioned. There is no need to remove this category. Just make the new categories subcategories of this category. When creating new categories remember to pay attention to the capitalization: they should be named "Open source animation software" and "Proprietary animation software". The animation software article itself would also benefit from expansion. JonHarder 13:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Split?
Talk:Royal Doulton

message: This article sounds like an advertisement.
:I have given it a substantial rewrite and hope the result still includes the important information without all the hype. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 22:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can the tag be removed now? Snowman 22:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to say yes but now someone has put back some of the advert sludge. I will revert if no one else does so first, or if there's no sensible discussion on this page about what should go in and what should come out. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 16:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I was not trying to put more advertising sludge in the article but to put something in the lead that shows how this company relates to other companies in the field and to the industry of pottery/porcelain in England. I think it is a great article and does not sound like advertising at all. I would say to remove the advertising tag. --Tinned Elk 19:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

text: In retrospect I think I over-reacted. Sorry! I'll remove the tag now. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 21:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: no problem. --Tinned Elk 00:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: I feel not enough emphasis is placed on Royal Albert and there is very little about this on the web. Is there a reason for this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.209.97.34 (talk) 11:15, 16:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Albert 

message: Would a section on Royal Doulton Flambe ware be appropriate. I own a couple of pieces of this, but do not know how importnat it is in the overall story of Royal Doulton. HairyWombat (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flambe ware 
Talk:HNoMS Draug (1908)

message: I took the liberty of moving the subsection on towing MTBs to follow that on mothering the same. I did it for stylistic reasons, but I think it also improves the chronology. PKKloeppel (talk) 01:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the move, but when did you do it? I don't see any move having been made. Manxruler (talk) 02:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go do it then. Manxruler (talk) 02:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reordering
Talk:HNoMS Eidsvold

message: An inconsistency is apparent. In the title and opening paragraph, the ship is named HNoMS Eidsvold, but thereafter is called KNM Eidsvold. I would presume that the latter is correct, but am not sure. Is the former then a false construction, made for the benefit of English readers, of the sort that is deprecated by Wikipedia (style manual)? (The same question can be raised concerning articles on other Norwegian ships with prefix HNoMS.) PKKloeppel (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: HNoMS is the correct English language prefix for Royal Norwegian Navy ships. KNM is simply the Norwegian language version (literal meaning: Kongelig Norsk Marine → Royal Norwegian Navy). Some early editors on these articles used the two terms in a rather confused manner. It should be HNoMS. I'll go fix it here right away. Manxruler (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: However, the Norwegian Navy only introduced the prefix KNM in 1946, long after the Eidsvold had gone down. The use of the prefix, Norwegian or English, is therefore inappropriate. Indeed, the Norwegian Wiki therefore does not use any prefix for the ship. --Cosal (talk) 07:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: HNoMS vs KNM
Talk:HNoMS Fridtjof Nansen (1930)

message: It has long been my understanding that an encyclopedia presents facts, rather than viewpoints or assertions or informal "agreements" among a few individual contributors. Why then are Norwegian navy ships that were not in active service in 1946 or thereafter persistently shown here with the prefix HNoMS? Firstly, this is an incorrect translation of the Norwegian KNM which stands for Kongelige Norske Marine or Royal Norwegian Navy. Secondly, and more importantly, this prefix was, as is my understanding, introduced only in 1946, see for example the statement on the Norwegian Wiki-page https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_over_den_Kongelige_Norske_Marines_skip. If this matter was discussed somewhere in the Wiki-framework, where? And if it was, why did it apparently result in an obviously faulty outcome. --Cosal (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Well. Yes. Your understanding is correct to a certain point, although WP:Consensus is the main principle here. Consensus, or "agreement" as you seem to call it. Furthermore: (1.) HNoMS is not a "translation" of KNM. It is the English prefix for Norwegian naval ships, which (2.) was first used during the war, and is tied to KNM mostly in that a Norwegian version was created in 1946. Also, what other wikis do, is irrelevant. Cheers. Manxruler (talk) 22:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And is what the Norwegian navy does also irrelevant? because a Wiki-consensus overrides it? If that is so it is a sad commentary on the reliability of Wiki a serious source of information. --Cosal (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really understand what you mean by "what the Norwegian navy does". In English-language contexts the Royal Norwegian Navy uses HNoMS. I have done some research over at Google Books, and the results clearly show that "His Norwegian Majesty's Ship" (HNoMS or HNMS) has been in use in English-language texts since at least 1896/1899, as well as during the Second World War (1942, 1944, 1944, 1945 and 1945). The last of those links is by the Royal Norwegian Government Information Office, so the Norwegians used HNoMS in English-language contexts too, pre-1946. This clearly demonstrates the pre-1946 (even pre-1900) use of His Norwegian Majesty's Ship for vessels of the Royal Norwegian Navy in English-language sources. Manxruler (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship name prefix
Talk:Nerva

message: It is written that he played a vital part in exposing the Pisonian conspiracy of 65. Tacitus, Annales, Book XV,48 says consul Silius Nerva. Nerva was no consul in 65, it was A. Licinius Nerva Silianus (January–June) together with Marcus Julius Vestinus Atticus (see List of Roman consuls). Is it possible that there is confusion ? (Peluba (talk) 09:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pisonian conspiracy 

message: The lede and the infobox say 27 January, but the text says 28 January with 2 sources.  Which is correct? --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 00:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:Nami (One Piece)

message: Could someone please change the picture into the very first appearance of the character, which is at the cover of the first volume?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.80.247.35 (talk) 15:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request. 
Talk:Praskovia Kovalyova-Zhemchugova

message: Sorry, I took this off, because it is not relevant at this place:
"At the end of the 1780s the actors of the troupe Medox (a female section of Sheremetev's troupe supervised by M.S. Sinyavskaya) began to teach the serf actors." 
(Meladina 13:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honeyz

message: This article isn't encyclopedic at all!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.110.197 (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was going to do a sweep across the article to see what was sourced. Turns out none of it was apart from chart positions in the Discography. Can we start again with this article? If you want to write it, then please make some effort. An article is worthless without some verfiable information.Thank you.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Célena Cherry

message: The accent indicates the bio subject presumably wants her name pronounced SAY-lena, rather than Se-LAY-na. Perhaps someone can confirm this and add an IPA pronuciation box to the lead to show how the name is pronounced? In ictu oculi (talk) 01:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be a vanity stylization. It would be better to have some evidence that the name is pronounced as you suspect. --BDD (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:HNoMY Norge

message: Please take a look at this link 1. Is this the same Philante? Inge 10:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A private page containing an image of Norge during WWII. Inge 11:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's the same one. I have expanded the text to include her war service.  Alansplodge (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII history 
Talk:Pallikoodam (school)

message: hmmmm.... haven't gone through all the edits, but how does a page about a school turn into a page about a film? 
i would propose a revert, and the creation of a new article Pallikoodam(film), or something on those lines. joseph 17:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this concern has been addressed by now. Please check Pallikoodam (disambiguation) for the different subjects with same/similar name. Sahrudayan (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  where did the school go? 
Talk:Argentine beef

message: Argentina has the world's highest consumption rate of beef, at 58,8 kg a year per capita.[hhttp://www.sudesteagropecuario.com.ar/2011/02/23/en-2010-el-consumo-local-de-carne-vacuna-fue-el-mas-bajo-desde-2002/ 58,8 kg a year per capita]. Someone wrote that Uruguay consume more meat than Argentina... but Uruguay consumes 58,2 kg a year per capita, and Argentina consume 58,8 kg a year per capita. 
--El rrienseolava (talk) 00:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest consumption rate of beef 
Talk:HNoMS Pol III

message: Was Leif Weldin-Olsen really the first casualty in the war between Norway and Germany? I believe some German sailors died on April 8th 1940 as their troop transport ships (i think one was named M/S Seattle) sank.. Correct me if I'm wrong
:Well, technicaly M/S Seattle wasn't sunk by military action from the Norwegians, so a state of war between Norway and Germany didn't exist. However, to make everything clearer, I've spesified that capt Olsen was the first Norwegian casualty. WegianWarrior 04:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Raisina Bengali Senior Secondary School

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 08:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Schienenzeppelin

message: The two articles should be merged.  I suggest the name 'rail blimp', which conveys the same idea but is more descriptive for the English-speaking world. A cross reference to the Bennie Railplane would also be in order. Gordon Vigurs 13:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks a pretty good job.  Thanks. Gordon Vigurs 01:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It's the Same Thing
Talk:HNoMS Thor (1872)

message: Somebody who knows more about the nuances of table setup needs to fix the table so that the lines separating sections do not extend through the infobox.  It can be done; if you can fix it, I'll try to remember how to do it next time.  Gene Nygaard 15:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All ship infoboxes have that on the first part of the table.  The flag on the right and the "Career" heading on the left.  I took out the word "Norway" to make it look a bit better.  Compare with HMAS Sydney, USS Monitor, RMS Titanic or CSS Virginia. Wikipeterproject 11:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix infobox