Talk:Blood donation in England

message: a third of newly diagnosed individuals with HIV in the UK were MSM’s. The greatest numbers recorded since the start of the epidemic. MSM also account for 46% of all diagnoses since 1981.
So a third of newly diagnosed cases in men was the highest ever.  Which means that the maximum diagnosed in any year is a third.  So in all the years since 1981 the maxmum total is one third.  But the article says it is 46%.  Something is either wrong with the maths or the statement.  I suppose it means that a greater number of people overall were diagnosed, and thus the third of them that were 'MSM' were a greater actual number than before, rather than a greater proportion than before, but the phrasing is dubious.JiMternet 09:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you had bothered to quote all of the first sentance, rather than just the second part of it, it would have been clear: "According to the latest statistics (2005) from the Health Protection Agency a third of newly diagnosed individuals with HIV in the UK were MSM." In other words, a third of the single year of 2005's diagnoses, as opposed to 46% of the years 1981-2005's. Nick Cooper (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HIV Infection Rates

message: The pre-donation section talks about people who 'identify as homosexual' being ineligible to give blood. The issue isn't one of sexuality, more of past sexual acts -- there isn't a strict correlation (or implication in either direction). The subsequent talk of 'the gay scare' strikes me as emotive, particularly with no supporting reference. I'm putting a POV-section on this for the moment until I or someone else can come up with a better way of approaching the MSM issue (if indeed this is the right section to do it in). Alexsdutton (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As said above, the rules do not say anything about being homosexual only "Men who have had anal or oral sex with another man, with or without a condom or other forms of protection". --Selbs101 (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-donation: "identify as homosexual" -- NPOV? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Blood donation in England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901040814/http://www.ipsofactoj.com:80/international/2001/Part03/int2001(3)-009.htm to http://www.ipsofactoj.com/international/2001/Part03/int2001%283%29-009.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Blood donation in England. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150206033717/http://www.blood.co.uk/giving-blood/faqs/index.asp to http://www.blood.co.uk/giving-blood/faqs/index.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ipsofactoj.com/international/2001/Part03/int2001%283%29-009.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808140155/http://www.amicustheunion.org/default.aspx?page=1340 to http://www.amicustheunion.org/Default.aspx?page=1340
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified