Talk:Orson Scott Card bibliography

message: * Sarah (2000) 
* Rebekah (2001) 
* Rachel and Leah (2004) 
* The Wives of Israel (forthcoming)
--> Are you sure it is "Womens"? And shouldn't, for uniformity's sake, the titles be something like Rebekah? I've just copied those red links to Heroines in literature but they do not look right to me. <KF> 03:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed per your suggestions. This was an easy fix since none of the articles for these books exist yet. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know exactly what the books are titled, but "Womens" is incorrect grammar. "Women" is plural. ---J.S  (T/C) 16:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, heres a source for the names: Amazon.com calls it "Sarah: Women of Genesis" "Rachel and Leah: Women of Genesis" and "Rebekah (Women of Genesis)" - Thanks a lot for the consistent naming Card:) ---J.S  (T/C) 16:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Womens" is funnier.  I say make it say that and leave it.  Just kidding, of course. Professor Chaos 01:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The "Women of Genesis" series

message: Wyrms is both a novel and a graphic novel.  There are two listings.  They should both point to different pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmcalduff (talk • contribs) 12:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are the same story, they can be covered on the same page.  Or do you mean that the graphic novel has the same name, but is not by Card?  Any more information on the graphic novel? I can't find it on Amazon.com. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 16:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They could be but there are already two pages.  There is one for the novel and one for the comic book series.  I didn't create either page.  I was just saying that since there are separate pages for both of them there should be a link to both of them on this page since it is a listing of cards works. Pmcalduff (talk) 01:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Okay, it is already in the list (under "Other works").  It might've just gotten added; I don't know.  But it's there. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 15:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry for the confusion.  When I made the comment that started this discussion it was because someone had deleted one of the two links to Wyrms thinking it was redundant.  After I put the second link back in "Other works" myself, I made that note in hopes that it would prevent someone else from doing the same thing.Pmcalduff (talk) 01:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wyrms 

message: thumb|this one
Cropped, out of context and obviously blown up and grainy as it is, in my opinion that picture of Card is laughably bad.  He looks great in it, and I'm sure the full picture wouldn't be jarring - but this is jarring because he's leaning on an unseen someone's shoulder - whose?  Probably the fellow who cropped and uploaded the picture.  Isn't there anything out there that could be used instead under fair use?  Or at least give us the full picture: hey look, this is me with Scott Card :) --Narfnarfsillywilly (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, anything's better than the bottom photo of him, which makes him look all wonky due to poor lighting.  As for your other comments, I don't know if I agree.  We want a photo of Card, not some anon fan.  I agree it's poor because of the cropping, but the bottom photo, apparently an attempt to fix the issue of the top photograph—by getting a photo of Card alone—resulted in a worse photo.  But if you still think we need the full photo, you'll have to contact the user who uploaded it in the first place. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 12:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 

message: I hold now in my hands one of the original Family Entertainment Network Video cassettes which claims an Orson Scott Card as it's storyboarder; is it this one :|  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.5.29 (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated New Testament 

message: "This is a list of the works of Orson Scott Card. (This list does not include criticisms, reviews, or things of the related written by him). "    - - -  What does 'things of the related' mean ?   - - -    
jg (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the top 

message: Should the Formic Wars books be separted from or left in the Ender's saga? - Dracuns (talk) 14:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Formic Wars series 

message: : first of multiple new sections
The Science Fiction Awards Database (sfadb.com) is nearly a year old, successor to the Locus Index to SF Awards. Perhaps it can replace Worlds Without End, providing greater reliability, better background linkage (what is this award?), or less repetition in references. I haven't examined it yet. --P64 (talk) 19:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SF awards source 

message: : last of two new sections posted at once
I think detailed coverage of Pseudonyms belongs here rather than in the biography, Orson Scott Card#Pseudonyms, where we identify seven of them. 
Two of those seven pseud. are in ISFDB for Card with one short fiction each; namely, the last of many items we list for Byron Walley (should be 1981) and the one item we list for Noam D. Pellume. ISFDB also lists one essay by Brother Orson, pseud. #8 if all do pass muster. 
We identify five more in the biography, used once each if i understand correctly --Frederick Bliss and P.Q. Gump for literary criticism or history, Brian Green for a play, Dinah Kirkham for a short story, Scott Richards for a novel. 
None of the pseudonymous works is listed here. Two evidently belong in the current set of tables, the play by Green and the novel by Richards.
I don't know whether short fiction and essays should or will be listed here. My general section is that known pseudonyms of Orson Scott Card should be covered here in prose before the beginning of the list. --P64 (talk) 19:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pseudonyms

message: How Tolkein Means by Orson Scott Card is an essay which appeared in Meditations on Middle-Earth, edited by karen hater, published by St. Martin's Press, New York, 2001.  His contribution here seems to me similar to his contribution to The Great Snape Debate which is listed in "other projects." -ErinHowarth (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Tolkein Means 

message: Card contributed to a sort of cook book.  Contributors told stories about recipes and then shared the recipe.  Saints Well Seasoned, Musings on How Food Nourishes Us: Body, Heart and Soul, edited by Linda Hoffman Kimball, 1998. -ErinHowarth (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feijoada (American Style) 

message: I've been removing information about Card's pseudonyms from his main page since it is overly detailed. Would it be appropriate to have a section for it here? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on pseudonyms? 

message: "Lost and Found" and Duplex are a series. Davidkasdan (talk) 00:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks. Dan Bloch (talk) 00:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micropowers series