Talk:Neutron activation analysis

message: I have removed some copyrighted mater which someone has wrongly pasted into wikipedia. Check  if you want to see the original.Cadmium
The only information that was Copyright was the images used, some taken from the source Pollard & Heron, others from the source you mention. The majority of the text (excluding some of the original Wikipedia article, and text added later by others) was written by me. If this information can be found elsewhere on the Internet it will have been cut & paste from this Wikipedia source. Alchemy pete  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 09:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

message: PGNAA is being strongly adopted by cement producers for the purpose of quickly and efficiently filtering raw materials which need to be mixed in precise ratios.  This industrial application is having a large impact and probably deserves mention, but it is not clear to me how to integrate this information into this article. -- M0llusk 15:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PGNAA in cement production 

message: if possible  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.242.166 (talk) 06:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add a content of instrument qualification or method validation... 

message: I am removing the suggested merge to neutron activation. There has been no discussion about this for a while (ever?) and I think they are pretty clearly separate articles. That article is about the physical process, this article is about an application of the phenomenon. -Cwenger (talk) 18:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing suggested merge 

message: . A 2006 version of the Wikipedia article had the words "found that samples containing certain rare earth elements became highly radioactive after exposure to a source of neutrons" which is also present in the external article. The first version of the external articles appear on web.archieve.org in 2008. A comparison of the 2006 Wikipedia version with the 2008 version of the external article has a lower score than today (60.5% vs. 63.8)( versus ). But the text was introduced with this edit (no wiki style at all) by User_talk:Alchemy_pete which had copyright problems related to images (see the talk page). Christian75 (talk) 13:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The University of Missouri page content goes back to at least 2000 . Comparison of 2006 Wikipedia with 2000 U Missouri is 67.4% . --Kkmurray (talk) 23:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, looks like a copyright violation. What is the next step? Christian75 (talk) 10:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright notice 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Neutron activation analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050406230741/http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk:80/science/text/techniques/sr-tech-naa-t.html to http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/science/text/techniques/sr-tech-naa-t.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Californium is in this place put it in it is used for neutron activation metal detectors. Porygon-Z 20:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cf