lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Manuel Piar

message: A good effort/first pass. It just needs some grammar correction, as the original writer is clearly not a native english speaker.
Pazouzou 13:27, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The article needs alternate references because, thus far, it reads like yet another ‘black legend’... this time denouncing the tragedy of a mulatto against a Mantuan elite headed by a megalomaniac (i.e. Simon Bolivar), who ended up martyrizing him.
Current scholarship has debunked this interpretation and proven, after copious research, that Piar was not the victim of a white elite conspiracy. Modern academic sources have, in fact, found sufficient basis to determine that Piar began an uprising, a rebellion, that risked sparking a civil war between republicans.
I recommend removing this article until the author consults alternate sources so we can be presented with a more balanced interpretation.
Among the extensive bibliography available I recommend the following references to get him or her started:
Yolimar Gil Amundarain. The decline of a Liberator: Historical aspects around the figure of Manuel Piar.  Mario Briceño Iragorry Historical Research Center No. 68, Vol XXXV.  July-December, 2017 pp.  89-110.
J. de la Villa, "Manuel Carlos Piar", in G. Bleiberg (dir.), Dictionary of the History of Spain, Madrid, Editorial Alliance, 1981.
Antonio Octavio Tour, Biography of General Manuel Carlos Piar, 1777-1817.  Publisher, Editorial Venevasco. 1985. Original from, the University of Virginia.
W. M. Jackson, “Manuel Carlos Piar“, in Hispanic-American Encyclopedic Dictionary of Literature, Science, Arts, t.  XVI, London.
 Etc. Helares (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another ‘Black Leyend’
Talk:Royal Regina Rifles

message: Anyone know which of the orders of precedence is right?
Lanark & Renfrew are no longer an Infantry unit - ftp://hr.ottawa-hull.mil.ca/Downloads/Dhh/CFPs/cfp200.pdf (Honours Flags & Heritage structure of the canadian forces) refers.Bridesmill 16:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia in webcomics

message: A Wikirant by Ozy and Millie. I'm hesitant to list it, though, as "the Webcomics Choice Awards Award Ceremony 2007" isn't really a "webcomic." ... OR IS IT? --210.49.99.248 16:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... where "Ozy and Millie" is redefined as "characters from Dandy and Company".  —Tamfang 04:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this count?

message: I decided to read all of these, and it was actually rather hard to find which bit to click on to get to read the actual comic.  I standardized the rows as DATE, Name of Webcomic(link),Comic Strip Title(link),Summary.  I really think this should be in straight tabular columns, but if anyone has better ideas great.  It wouldn't be hard to put in month anchors again if people really want them, now that the date is in the first column, but I thought they were annoying.  Having the text here clearly summarize the specific Wikipedia issue explored is helpful for a number of reasons, but in particular it helps as a double-check of whether we should bother mentioning the comic in this particular list. Metaeducation 13:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table format 

message: I want to add a citation for a strip from the webcomic Unspeakable Vault (of Doom), but can't tell the date of it.
This is the cite: 
--Auric (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So we add an Undated section.  Why the nowiki?  —Tamfang (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I contribute using a dial-up connection and a slow computer. I did this so someone who wanted to copy the cite could do so without clicking on [edit] and having to wait. This usually takes me 3-5 minutes (more if the browser freezes). --Auric (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  date needed 

message: Is there, or was there ever, a good reason for the dates to be "linked"? —Tamfang (talk) 13:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  permanent red ink 

message: wikipedia vs youtube.©Geni (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: one we missed

message: The page is currently in the Wikipedia namespace which is for Wikipedia administration pages.  However, the page is also in a category that's for articles (encyclopedic content). It could be moved into article namspace (e.g. like Wikipedia in culture) or it could have the article category removed (e.g. like Wikipedia:Wikipedia in video games).  Thoughts ? DexDor (talk) 10:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this admin or content ?
Talk:Simeon the Just

message: A google search of machon mamre  for simoen haZadik is a good resource for sources.  Jon513 13:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: This thing reads like it's coming from a Rabbi, it needs to stop being from the perspective of a Jew and instead be from the perspective of an encyclopedia.  65.94.97.111 02:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actualy from the Jewish Encyclopedia. Can you be more specific about what you dont like in the article? --Shlomke 04:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: A hebrew version of this article was recently created, it it very long and well source.  It would be worthwhile to copy as much as possible from it, as this article suffers horible for "Jewish Encyclopedia syndrome".  Jon513 14:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but if you can read Hebrew, how come you didn't notuce that you have a picture of the wrong burial cave? Daniel Tzvi 19:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hebrew article 

message: * Simeon the Righteous = 15,300 GB.hits 
* Simeon the Just = 3,700 GB.hits
In ictu oculi (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:COMMONNAME]]

message: The article asserts: After Simeon's death men ceased to utter the Tetragrammaton aloud (Yoma 30b; Tosef. Soṭah, xiii).
I reviewed Yoma 30a and 30b carefully and found no such statement. Therefore I removed the page reference, but it would still be great if someone could find the actual correct page. MosheEmes (talk) 13:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of the Name 

message: How could he meet Alexander in 323bc if he wasn't born until 310?  Disacorns (talk) 07:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:History of the Michigan Marching Band

message: Terryfoster 13:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: I see that this topic has been marked with the wikify and cleanup tags.  Towards that end, I'm attempting to put together an m:EasyTimeline for the MMB history.  It's on my user page, if anyone is interested. Parkerdr 01:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The timeline is now on the page, in the first section.  Parkerdr 03:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify, Wikify
Talk:Roger Williams (British politician)

message: A lot of the current page (2006-04-03) is directly lifted from www.rogerwilliams.org.uk - which does not provide any indication that the information can be considered in the public domain. There are also images used in a similar vein.
Some of it might also be considered POV. Unless the copyright information is shown to be distributable under GFDL - considerable editing/reversion might be necessary. Nogwa 13:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Google Compute

message: Hello. I wrote an article about a related topic, Google Groups. As a new Wikipedia writer, I would appreciate any feedback on my article. Please help me by posting your feedback at the Wikipedia:Article Feedback Desk. If you wrote an article and are seeking feedback on it, please post your article at the Article Feedback Desk as well. If you could suggest better ways for me to seek feedback on my article, do leave a note at my talk page.  --J.L.W.S. The Special One 13:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking feedback on [[Google Groups]] article
Talk:Google Suggest

message: Hello. I wrote an article about a related topic, Google Groups. As a new Wikipedia writer, I would appreciate any feedback on my article. Please help me by posting your feedback at the Wikipedia:Article Feedback Desk. If you wrote an article and are seeking feedback on it, please post your article at the Article Feedback Desk as well. If you could suggest better ways for me to seek feedback on my article, do leave a note at my talk page.  --J.L.W.S. The Special One 13:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking feedback on [[Google Groups]] article
File talk:Soverign's Entrance.JPG

message: I think this image was already losslessly rotated, but the rotation effect wasn't working because the metadata was seperated from the file. I unlosslessly rotated the image. If this was not correct for me to do, please contact me about it. Jecowa 13:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me rephrase that. There was a request to losslessly rotate this image. However, this image was already losslessly rotated, but Wikipedia is not compatible with losslessly rotated images. Wikipedia will display losslessly rotated images, but only in the unrotated form. Jecowa 01:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:James Crotty (economist)

message: I have edited the article to remove POV descriptions like "valuable and original" and "recognized as one of the world's leading..."  If those descriptions are accurate AND verifiable, they have to be adequately sourced to be included.  Mangojuice 13:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Today, 7 Dec 2022, I was very happy to find a Wiki bio of James Crotty; as I was reading the London Review of Books article on his recent book "Keynes Against Capitalism" and thought that this James Crotty may be the same professor I knew at SUNY Buffalo whilst I got my BA, MA, PHD there !964-73.  He was there awarded as the best teacher, as rated by students, and was known as a Marxist.  SUNYAB being strictly Neoclassical refused him tenure, I believe, and so he went on to U Mass Amherst as I recall.  In any event, bios of such persons on Wiki are an extremely important resource for persons such as myself who are looking up people from fifty years ago.  At SUNYAB Crotty was an important counterpoint and thought policeman to temper the "party line" of the neo-classical group which fed into the neoliberalism that has been so damaging to the USA economy and society.  Sincerely, Anthony Lawrence, 163 John Brown Road Lake Placid, NY 12946 67.249.168.180 (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rohini (satellite)

message: This article requires an image of Rohini space satellite thanks. SamuraiJack 13:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Tyuccurcufrcuufcigfu 110.227.227.15 (talk) 10:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rohini RS -1
Talk:Satellite Launch Vehicle

message: *Image
This article requires an image of SLV at present it has an image of GSLV. SamuraiJack 14:00, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed a portion of article suggesting SLV-3 first stage was modified to be used on RLV-TD HEX01 citing this report calling HS9 booster as "merely the" first stage of SLV-3. HS9 is derived from S9 to have slower burn rate and thrust profile and has thinner casing than PSOM (aka S9) and S9 in closely related to S1 but has different binder (HTPB) from it (PBAN).  Ohsin  10:28, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  HS9 vs S1. 

message: India satellite launching vehicles 42.108.127.34 (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  India's satellite launching vehicle
Talk:Michael Marissen

message: Does this clean it up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.1.86 (talk) 14:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the notablity tag; being head of Swarthmore's music department and having guest-taught at Oberlin and Princeton do not establish notability, nor do a listing of published books; see WP:Notability for criteria for inclusion, which could be, for example, three citations in mainstream media or other reliable sources of significant nature.  Otherwise the subject of this article is only notable for being a member of the immediate family of Liberal Party activist Mark Marissen, and that's not enough.Skookum1 (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Augmented Satellite Launch Vehicle

message: This article requires an image of ASLV. SamuraiJack 14:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Politics of Azerbaijan

message: Can somebody please get the names of the cabinet, ministries and parliament in some sort of a colum, I couldnt get it done right. Baku87 14:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azerbaijan 

message: How can Azerbaijan be classified as a presidential republic if the head of state and head of government are not vested on the same person, with the latter titles being attributed, respectively, to the President and the Prime Minister of Azerbaijan? --B.Lameira (talk) 15:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It does not make sense
Category talk:Neighbourhoods of Istanbul

message: It seems useful to have an overview of pages dealing with neighbo(ur)hoods of Istanbul.
At this moment many such pages have been categorized as Category:Districts of Istanbul.
However, the notion of district is well defined, an exhaustive list is given in Template:Districts of Istanbul, and many pages currently categorized as an Istanbul district describe some lesser entity.
It might be possible to identify "neighbourhood" with the official notion of mahalle, but personally I don't care; anything notable that is being thought of as a neighbourhood by a reasonable number of people should qualify, for all I care. But, of course, anyone with strong feelings about the issue is welcome to re-categorize, or sub-categorize, or whatever. LambiamTalk 14:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this category 

message: Should 'neighbourhood' be written with its British or American spelling? I don't want to change it (or perhaps not change it) if I'm not supposed to. 2601:40C:4002:6A70:5D48:EC79:56:6EB0 (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Neighbourhood' spelling
Talk:Biograph Company

message: Well, it's 2010 now, no filming on the Moon. Time to get rid of all that crap?172.191.4.177 (talk) 03:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Not) To The Moon! 
Talk:Thomas Dolby

message: So, where was he actually born? The article first claims in Cairo, but then under Trivia says that this isn't so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  62.79.44.136  (talk)  14:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first issue has been taken care of, it seems, but I agree with your second statement. The beginning of the article has a "Teen Magazine" tone that makes it seem more like an editorial than an encyclopedia entry.  I really don't need to read dispelled myths about Thomas Dolby at the beginning of what should be a fact-based article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.226.142 (talk) 21:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the entire article reads like it was written by a publicity agent.  Was it?2601:602:9301:F95A:2081:3E62:D0B5:89C4 (talk) 08:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  General complaints 

message: So, is there any evidence in source that he promotes the idea of a flat earth, or is it just some kind of publicity gimmick? — SMcCandlish    Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 17:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always assumed that the Flat Earth Society was simply named to correspond with the title of Dolby's 2nd album. synthfiend (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to this  he's a charter member. Kortoso  (talk) 18:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flat Earth Society 
Talk:Double wishbone suspension

message: very important: two key articles are missing from the suspension part: pushrod and pullrod suspension systems, and maybe even a third more important one, electronically controlled suspension (made by bose). this would complete a quite short secttion of wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.73.18.79 (talk • contribs) 
: The latter is somewhat covered here.  --Interiot 17:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added brief section on push/pull rods, though this is my first proper edit, so feel free to edit further etc. or give recommendations for the future! This new section could also use a diagram of some kind. thanks, ARDawson (talk) 12:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned the article up a bit, and also clarified the purpose of the pushrod and pullrod in the racing car. Feel free to add a diagram or animation if you can find one. Bdc101 (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I like your edit, reads considerably better, much clearer! ARDawson (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been tagged as being too technical for most readers to understand since May iof 2008, but it does not seem too techical to me.  Unless someone objects, I am going to wait seven days and then remove the tag. (posted 11:10, 1 March 2011) Guymacon (talk)
:Removed tag. Guy Macon (talk) 19:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical for most readers to understand? 

message: I, VX1NG propose that Short long arms suspension be merged with this article. Regards, VX1NG (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Namshub

message: Since this is an encyclopedia the real world meaning of this word has got to trump the made up meaning from a Neal Stephanson novel. I love the novel but it already has a giant page dedicated to it. This should be merged back into Asurlado (again!). I have changed the article so that the line between fact and fiction is obvious. If you have any references for the Neal Stephanson version being based on real archeology then please give them, it will make the article more interesting, otherwise we have to go with what we know. --Darkfred Talk to me 14:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact vrs. Fantasy
Talk:Eight Deer Jaguar Claw

message: Year of death in text inconsistent with year of death in category.  Gene Nygaard 14:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose a renaming of this article to " Lord 8 Deer 'Jaguar Claw' ", as this is the form most used by academics.Mhmrodrigues (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Chemical industry

message: I have taken a business history approach and added an introduction about the current state of the industry, some history from Chandler, and a short bibliography. Rjensen 20:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding industrial overview

message: This section is woefully inadequate.  It ought to go into the industrial revolution that started with Priestley and went through the Victorian period.
108.45.122.74 (talk) 13:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: It's 151.236.189.210 (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical industry
Talk:Ch'oe Mu-sŏn

message: Please propose edits in this section and gain consensus before making edits.  Thanks.melonbarmonster 22:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I put it to the version that has been stable for weeks while we discuss any you'd like to make. --Cheers, Komdori 22:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit proposal

message: Ok, since we're supposed to discuss what we're changing in here, perhaps those folks who seem to be bound and determined to change what was a good, informative NPOV article into a Korean one could please explain why they feel they need to add in a few paragraphs about Japanese pirates (When there was a very serviceable link to that before hand) and change the wording to remove the fact that Choe got gunpowder from a Chinese merchant.--Jusenkyoguide (talk) 09:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Edit war
Talk:Spike (The Land Before Time)

message: I think Spike is an ankylosaur, not a stegosaur. Land Before Time could have been set in the Late Cretaceous period, and the stegosaur species would have been extinct by then.
:No, he's not.  Ankylosauruss are called club-tails in the movies.  He is called a spike-tail (thus the name Spike)
:The Official LBT site has him as a Stegosaur, so that's what I'm going with.Clawandfang (talk) 14:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Debate about species

message: Sorry about that. I had fixed a few things, but then realised that I was simply manually undoing someone else's edit. So I had to undo mine first.Clawandfang (talk) 14:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass Undos
Talk:Reliance of the Traveller

message: A user recently rewrote this entire article without first conferring with others here on the talk page.  I reversed all the edits not because I took issue with the specific changes but because it isn't right to simply trash one version of an article and write an entirely new one without checking here on the talk page.  In the future please do not make sweeping edits without first talking it over. MezzoMezzo 20:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing without seeking a consensus first

message: I don't consider me entitled to edit the article-page (first because I'm not even a native english speaking person myself, and second because of the consensus remark above (9 May 2007)), but I read in the article : "Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources".  Well, the source I have to offer, is the work in question itself. It is to be found at http://www.shafiifiqh.com/maktabah/relianceoftraveller.pdf . Maybe, if consensus is reached, someone likes to add it as an external link. Fri 16 sept 2011  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.96.51.15 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Shouldn't there be a section that involves criticisms of this particular thing? Quite frankly, it seems like the sort of thing that should be broadly condemned by Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
It's a pretty basic idea, really. There are Criticism sections in thousands of other Wikipedia articles. And Reliance of the Traveller pretty well invites criticism, doesn't it? We are talking about 14th century Islam here.
And just to be clear- yes this is Islam, it's really Islam, it's not some false version of Islam, it is well and truly Islam. And it's truly awful, isn't it? It's just crammed full of terrible ideas that should be disputed, rejected, and left in the past- actually, so many of these ideas should have never been ideated in the first place. They absolutely should not be defended or even partially dragged into the modern day, just in the interest of saving face. That is yet another terrible idea.
12.119.36.46 (talk) 02:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms
Talk:Eileen Brennan

message: There's a bit of confusion as to whether Miss Brennan was bon in 1935 or 1938. I'd always seen 1935 in refrence books and various other sources and then a couple of years ago I saw 1938 on the IMDB (a source I know can not be relied on 100%). Is there anyone out there who may have a bit of inside knowledge on  Eileen (perhaps the person who changed the date on here from '38 to '35) that can confirm one or the other? Crisso 15:04, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From the little experience I've had of Yahoo Movies, they seem a pretty authorititive source. If she'd studied at the American Academy of Dramatic Art from 1955-1956 then we can pretty much rule out 1938. Crisso 14:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, 1932. --Fallout boy 01:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Thankyou Fallout boy for finally settling this matter. I thought Imdb was wrong. Crisso 22:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Year?

message: "In November 2010, she joined the Broadway company of Wicked in the role of Madame Morrible."
This isn't verifiable anywhere.  Kathy Fitzgerald is presently Madame Morrible.  And there is no commentary of her ever being in the cast.
http://www.broadway.com/shows/wicked/  12.162.122.5 (talk)   23:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems unlikely. I'll remove it pending a reliable source.   Will Beback  talk   23:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's too bad. She probably wanted the role but was too sick to perform. God Bless her. Quis separabit? 19:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wicked