lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Minister of Foreign Affairs (Denmark)

message: In establishing a wiki link to the Danish wiki, we have two possibilities:
Udenrigsministeriet
and Udenrigsminister
It seems that the closer translation is udenrigsminister, but in the Danish wiki, the udenrigsministeriet article is better and more relevant. What do you think?Peregrine981 02:30, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
::da:Udenrigsministeriet corresponds to Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and :da:udenrigsminister corresponds to Foreign Minister. The Danish wikipedia simply doesn't have an article about the Danish Foreign Minister post, so we shouldn't add any interwiki link untill the Danish wikipedia gets an article. Thue | talk 19:20, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:H.O.R.D.E. Festival

message: Shouldn't there be a period after the last E? Fire Star 02:38, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't seem likely to be controversial. Why not be bold and go ahead and hit the move button. If that doesn't work, or you need help, let us know. Jonathunder 20:34, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)
----
I can't vouch for much of the info on this page, but wanted to clean it all up at bit.  Can anyone more fluent in 'jam' bands weigh in here?  Cabiria 15:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Candle demonstration in Bratislava

message: It was first mass demonstration since certain time? Since 1980s? Pavel Vozenilek 02:41, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was first demonstration of late 80', not in whole history in communist Czechoslovakia (there were many, many more before). Pavel Vozenilek 18:29, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First demonstration?

message: those interesting in helping, have a look at User:MikeGogulski/Sandbox/cd, where i've begun. — Mike Gogulski ↗C•@•T↗ 01:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  translating from SK wiki article
Talk:Blobject

message: I've never encountered this term except in recent philosophical writing, where it refers to the universe as a whole.  (I believe it was coined by Ted Sider.)  Obviously a very different sense of the word; maybe there should be a disambiguation?  I don't really have the time or the know-how to add one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WadeMcR (talk • contribs) 20:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, I think it was in "Austere realism: contextual semantics meets minimal ontology" by Terry Horgan, Matjaž Potrč. Be that as it may, I too was surprised (appalled, horrified) to find this given as the primary meaning of the term. At least a disambiguation page is needed, once there's an article (or we can locate a section of a relevant article) discussing the (to my mind correct, but that's my POV) meaning of the term. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metaphysical term 
Talk:Alexander Dubček

message: A clarification of how he died: there are conspiracy theories (probably for the same reasons that they are applied to any other political figure who dies violently/in an unexplained manner).
His autobiography should be mentioned. Jackiespeel 14:58, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. TomyDuby (talk) 09:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed?

message: The section about strontium poisoning needs more refrerences with clickable links. dima 12:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strontium 

message: New finds are readily accepted; be bold!   Aar  ►  02:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Better" Image 

message: He "passively supported the union between Czechs and Slovaks..."  What does "passively supported" purport to mean?  He either supported union or he didn't.  Clarification requested.  72.229.55.38 (talk) 05:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passively supported?? 
Talk:Thelxinoe (moon)

message: Segmental pronunciation is almost certainly thel-zi-noh-ee, but the placement of the stress is unknown: Either thel-zin'-oh-ee or thel'-zi-noh'-ee. --kwami 03:04, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on Arsinoë (Αρσινόη) ar-sin'-oh-ee, Theonoë (Θεονόη) thee-on'-oh-ee, etc., I'd expect Thelxinoë (Θελξινόη) to also have the stress on the antepenult: thel-zin'-oh-ee. --kwami 01:27, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm taking the question mark out. The pronunciation has not been confirmed, but standard stress rules would place the stress on the antepenult, and I expect this name is too rare to be irregular. --kwami 01:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I get pronouncing the x as a z, but isn't the h also silent?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.10.7.131 (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a /z/ but a /ks/ in English, as the x is not initial. (I see the article is correct now.) A silent h would produce the aspirated /th/ that was the ancient pronunciation of theta, but the common English pronunciation of words borrowed from Greek would use /θ/ as we have. Double sharp (talk) 04:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation
Talk:Maelstrom (comics)

message: OK, so what, to you, "SoM," classifies as significant?  MAYBE I can see removing Maely's mom and mate, since we never actually see either, but his father was the whole reason he got into villaining in the first place; and his son was the reason he was absent from the villain scene from 1998 to 2005.
Again--while I disagree with removing the supervillains he gave genetic info to, I can grudgingly accept it.  But the Weird Sisters and his minions are fairly important, in my view. (Thanos6)
:In view of the dad, Sisters and minions, my test for putting them into the sidebox is "can they merit their own article which is more than a regurgitation of the facts in the article at hand". It's  designed for quick intrawiki links and the briefest summaries possible rather than an exhaustive list. Otherwise, they can go in the text, where relevant, but not the SHB. - SoM 00:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant events? 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  15:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Book of Counted Sorrows

message: The Book of Counted Sorrows is refered to by Terry Goodkind in his "Truth of the Sword" series.  The first book, "Wizard's First Rule", Terry Goodkind (the author) has the main character memorizing the Book of Counted Sorrows.  It is refered to often in the series.  One would wonder which Book of Counted Sorrows came first, King's or Goodkind's - or where either of them got the idea.
Sorry, but the book the character has to memorize in Goodkind's series is "The Book of Counted Shadows", not "Sorrows".
Msauers 21:20, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

message: What is the consenus on moving this article into The Book of Counted Sorrows? ant_ie 18:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to do it right now. Banana04131 18:00, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Defecation

message: But do not add the old one we need a new one. We also could add a video of a female and a video of a male.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Frost gamer 75 (talk • contribs) 
: You can record video of male and female defecating and upload it to Wikimedia Commons yourself. 36.72.217.40 (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes, a video of human defecation should be added 

message: There is a spelling mistake in the Physiology section of the Description (Table of Contents > Description > Physiology > Sentence 4):
"If the urge is not acted upon, the material in the rectum is often returned to the colon by reverse peristalsis, where more water is absorbed and the faeces is stored until the next mass peristaltic movement of the transverse and descending colon."
This misspelled word needs to be corrected to "feces". Seventeenyearoldchemist (talk) 05:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: not quite a typo, it's an difference between US and UK english. Don't see an established preference on this article so have swapped it - also that was the only occurrence of faeces and feces is used multiple times Cannolis (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: why is a video of a cow defecating on this page? 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:7D5A:649E:973D:8D66 (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2022 

message: Well, I started to do some cleanup and copy editing, but then realized this entire article is filled with poor writing. There's a lot of phrasing that's not only awkward and overly wordy, but sometimes just weird. This sentence, for example, left me confounded:
The onset rate keeps updating each year with dramatically increased number and the pathogen of the bowel disease are also complicated due to the complexity of the bowel organs, bowel diseases are diverse in terms of the small and big bowel.
I gave up trying to parse it. After realizing I couldn't figure out how it could possibly be reworked, I finally just deleted it. And with that, I've given up doing any further work on this article. Maybe I'll come back to it later when I'm not so tired. :) I encourage anyone contributing and/or watching to have a go. Yesthatbruce (talk) 03:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious cleanup needed 

message: To release all poop in the bowels 2600:1011:B33F:4423:E468:2AB:16BF:AA50 (talk) 03:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emma daily digestive supplement
Talk:Right-in/right-out

message: I'm going to be moving this article back to low-budget freeway, and writing an article specific to RIRO expressways.  Bear with me, I'm working on it!  Snickerdo 03:42, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'dd love to know the origins of the term. Presumably it stands for something? Do professionals say it as an acronym or abbreviation. Etc... Samaritan 19:29, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins? 

message: Whoever created the low-budget freeway article is a roadgeek who has a sophisticated nomenclature POV about the term freeway.  Sometimes, people will consider some divided highway with at-grade intersections a freeway just because it has no traffic lights and a speed of 65mph or more.  Sometimes, the features of the highway will use less concrete hence the "low-budger" therefore is not a neologism. --SuperDude 00:57, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, you created it (since moved here). And it is a neologism. --SPUI (talk) 05:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply to [[User:SPUI|SPUI]] 

message: Do we really need that many examples? 203.218.141.99 06:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I like to think I'm as roadgeeky as the next, but I must agree with the anon.  There are countless RIROs throughout the world: it's a slippery slope to provide them all.  I know I have numerous photos of RIROs at work -- I'll see about uploading them to get some photos, with which I will concurrently remove all the RIRO examples (unless anyone can provide some reason why a specific RIRO is notable over any other). --Thisisbossi 03:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the examples are not encyclopedic, so I have deleted them. --Una Smith (talk) 07:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: This needs a better title - there's no reason for choosing right-in/right-out rather than left-in/left-out as the article name, ideally neither should be used but rather some simple alternative.
zoney  ♣ talk 08:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a better title 

message: *  Is the last image in that link considered a right-in/right-out configuration. That looks to be a bit different then the Highway 35/115 exemple. --JForget  18:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not too familiar with this location specifically, so perhaps this particular location is an exception: but generally I wouldn't say that any type of interchange ramp is RIRO in the context of this article.  You could argue that pretty much all interchange ramps are, technically, RIRO (apart from LILO & a couple odd-balls); but that's certainly not what is intended by the term. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 01:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quebec Route 134

message: I've just added images of Ontario Highway 11 to illustrate RIRO expressways. Would it make more sense to pull some of that text out to the body of the article, and possibly create a new "RIRO expressways" section? --Chaswmsday (talk) 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIRO expressway images
Talk:Strela computer

message: I'm tempted to fix the spelling and grammar mistakes in this page, but am afraid that this will diminish the authenticity and authority of the article.  linas 03:46, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly are you tempted to do? Mikkalai 16:02, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix 

message: IMHO, Strela is not a mainframe, it is a supercomputer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 418ImATeapot (talk • contribs) 10:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMHO
Talk:New Christian

message: *  the reasons for move copied from WP:RM 
::*Support - The (proposed) New Christian (Jewish) and New Christian (Swedenborgian) are "equal" ambiguities: neither use of the term "New Christian" is particularly dominant, yet each use is quite distinct. Mac 04:00, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)   
::*Oppose now that New Christian (Swedenborgian) was moved to Swedenborgianism. violet/riga (t) 20:03, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After the move, the New Christian entry ought to be a disambiguation page pointing to both New Christian (Jewish) and New Christian (Swedenborgian).
===Decision===
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. New Christian (Swedenborgian) was moved to Swedenborgianism and the disambiguation is therefore no longer necessary. violet/riga (t) 20:03, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. New Christian (Swedenborgian) was moved to Swedenborgianism and the disambiguation is therefore no longer necessary. violet/riga (t) 20:03, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Decision

message: Unlike the merge sugested above, in this case the subject of these two articles is the same, it's simply a matter of having two terms for the same thing. Also note that in both w:pt and w:es there is only one article under the title "New Christian", and "Converso" is just a redirect to "New Christian". EuTugamsg 00:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Converso]] 

message: In Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_24#Category:New_Christians there is a proposal for merging :Category:New Christians with :Category:Conversos. Feel free to join the discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge categories?
Talk:Fruitafossor

message: "it may have been the earliest known relative to the evolutionary line leading to Theria." - What does this mean? Isn't, say, Dimetrodon also a "relative to the evolutionary line leading to Theria" - and even earlier than fruitafossor? ErikHaugen (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Earliest Relative

message: Fruitafossa is apparently known from a single specimen.  If so, the 155.7-150.8 Ma is an indication of uncertainty and not a duration of existence. The lead sentence should be changed.
Dan Milton (casual reader)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.211.72 (talk) 04:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: The article says that Fruitafossor weighed 6 g, but wouldn't it rather be 60 g? Because if I type in "Fruitafossor" on google, all the pages say "15 cm long" and "chipmunk sized"... Karli999 (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight
Talk:Paul Sorvino

message: No mention of Goodfellas? Anti-establishment 20:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Forgetting something?

message: I've never gotten a satisfactory answer for this question. I know George Dzundza left due to a dispute with the show's producers, but I have no idea why Paul was suddenly wiped off the show mid-season. The only good thing about that is that paved the way for Jerry Orbach (but Paul was great too).206.21.157.252 21:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why did he leave L&O?

message: Here I find a messy, embarrassing little rant with no pretensions of subjectivity. If it still looks like that in a couple of days, I plan to take a broom through it.
SelectSplat (talk) 06:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy Section

message: I was wondering if anyone would object to my cleaning up the filmography section, organizing it into tables by type of filmography appeared in.  It seems awfully messy the way the section is currently laid out.Satanhhh (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Filmography Cleanup

message: Ssffilms (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2022 

message: he was a proud veteran. Why no mention? Colbfi (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army service
Talk:2002 Überlingen mid-air collision

message: Recently I came across the phenomenon of hindsight bias and I wondered whether this bias might also be present in this Wikipedia article...
According to the hindsight bias, in retrospect it is overestimated how likely, predictable and/or inevitable an event was, and obviously a study has even found it in Wikipedia articles on accidents/catastrophes: doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0865-7
So I wondered whether that could be the case with this article, too, – and whether the disaster is presented as more predictable and inevitable than it actually was before. Maybe we should search again for information that would have spoken against its occurrence?
Apparently, the hindsight bias occurs because of a retrospective focus on information that spoke FOR the event while ignoring (or not taking seriously) information that would have argued for another outcome, which then, of course, leads to the impression of inevitability and foreseeability... This is why I wondered whether this article might 
also be affected by hindsight bias and should thus be checked again for this? --2A02:810D:1300:38E5:1DE1:57D:1732:FF2D (talk) 20:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindsight bias in this article? 

message: User:100.38.84.234 has been reverting my edits on the picture of the BAL Tu-154. The correct image of the aircraft would be the one with the white tail as in the wreckage of the Tu-154, the aircraft had a white post-lease tail, not the pre-lease blue tail seen on most BAL aircraft. The animations got it all wrong. 223.229.228.97 (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of BAL Tupolev Tu-154 

message: In this section the sentence "They traveled on an overnight train to Moscow and arrived on 29 June, then headed to the wrong airport so that they missed their original flight when their bus driver accidentally mistook them, and remained until 1 July to find the arranged charter flight." can we get some clarification on what this means and should read as?
"Headed to the wrong airport" which airport did they end up at? Did they choose to go to the wrong airport? I mean, I know they didn't, but this entire sentence could be a bit more concise about the mix-up.
"When the bus driver mistook them" Did the driver "mistook" them for different people, or did the driver drive them to the wrong airport? What exactly was the mistake made?
"Remained until 1 July to find the arranged charter flight" Did they remain at the wrong airport, or did they travel to the correct one? Previous archived discussion indicates the charter was a hasty arrangement, as well.
I mostly ask this because the cited source is behind a paywall, and I cannot check the source for context, in order to improve this sentence. King keudo (talk) 18:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detail Clarification
Talk:Daniel D. Tompkins

message: On what basis is there period after the "D"?  john k 05:03, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a separate stub article about Daniel Tompkins's wife Hannah, but, given the level of development of that article and the fact that Hannah Tompkins seems to have had little historical significance outside being the Veep's wife, I propose that the information in the Hannah Tompkins article be merged into a "Family" section in this article and [[Hannah Tompkins be redirected here.  Thoughts?  --Dynaflow babble 15:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, merge! Kraxler (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As the Wife of the Vice President of the United States perhaps she should have her own page.-Emargie (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Women are people too! With reference made to her "office" as "Second Lady" of the United States it seems appropriate to me that she has her own small page. Gevan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.209.77 (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think this is one case where WP:NOTINHERITED need not apply. I think the US Second Ladies are notable by default, and that a merger is not appropriate.  PKT(alk) 11:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Problem solved because the artist's article title was changed to Hannah Tompkins (artist). PKT(alk) 11:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

text: The Wife of the Vice President of the United States page mentioned above has a list of all of the "Second Ladies", with links to articles; none are currently "red", so elsewhere in WP, the standard is being set that the "office of Second Lady" merits an article, albeit of stub length, if that's all the content that is available.  Lini (talk) 11:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: It has been suggested that this page be merged. The merge discussion seems to have strayed from this article but some content may need to be added here from the other article as a section or smaller mention and merger proposal be closed.--Amadscientist (talk) 14:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Walter Benn Michaels

message: This page links to the wrong Knapp... his name is Steven, not Stephen.  And the link takes one to a completely different person.  Evidence of error: http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/1547.ctl
Steve MacIntyreSteveMacIntyre 02:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Knapp
Talk:Video coding

message: The page seems redundant with (and inferior to) the video codec page. Cat5nap 05:40, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With some editing, this page could give a good description of video coding. The page you mention is a mix of coding and compression with a heavy bias on computer software. Kegon (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this page useful?

message: I removed most of the irrelevant details and added some relevant ones. Some topics need more expansion but I've left that for a later date. Kegon (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started to Tidy up 

message: There was a section on compression. It was generic and had no specific relevance; there is already a wiki page on video compression. Kegon (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compression 

message: I removed the details about audio. This page is about video; audio is not part of video! Kegon (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio 

message: There should be at least another meaning for "video coding", used in the field of conveyors and process belts, as in the following sentence: mail sorting machines (OCR and video coding)  --Termofused (talk) 21:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed?