lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Post-acute-withdrawal syndrome

message: I don't see opiates being mentioned as one of the drugs that can cause PAWS? I'm not really versed on this subject, however I am currently being treated with suboxone for opiate addiction and my doctor took like 20 minutes to explain PAWS to me. From that, it was my understanding that opiate addicts can suffer from PAWS. (On the other hand, I'm being treated with a partial agonist opiate, so I don't really understand how it would affect me like he said, since I still have opiates in my body, lighting up my receptors.) 70.118.245.110 (talk) 19:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opiates 

message: Most of the articles cited are for the long term effects of alcohol, little show much in regards to PAWS and other drugs.  My contributions to this page's references and research collection add a few lines regarding overwhelming normalization of neurophysiology and cognition in the post-acute withdrawal phase.  I believe this wiki should be cleaned up to separate out the drugs. Miyog (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcohol versus the rest 

message: With the exception of benzodiazepines, there is little to no support in medical literature for the existence of PAWS. Yet – save for a brief mention in the intro – this article reads as if the existence of PAWS is settled fact. Anecdotal recollections of 12-step group participants should NOT be used in place of medical evidence to manufacture a "syndrome" out of thin air. I propose that this article be re-written to focus on PAWS as it relates to benzos, with a section that states that former abusers of other drugs have also reported experiencing PAWS, but that its existence is not supported by medical research. Viciouslies (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I hope other editors read this critique offered by Viciouslies, and keep it in mind when editing this article. Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 20:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grossly inaccurate 

message: I don't see opiates being mentioned as one of the drugs that can cause PAWS? I'm not really versed on this subject, however I am currently being treated with suboxone for opiate addiction and my doctor took like 20 minutes to explain PAWS to me. From that, it was my understanding that opiate addicts can suffer from PAWS. (On the other hand, I'm being treated with a partial agonist opiate, so I don't really understand how it would affect me like he said, since I still have opiates in my body, lighting up my receptors.) 70.118.245.110 (talk) 19:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opiates 

message: Most of the articles cited are for the long term effects of alcohol, little show much in regards to PAWS and other drugs.  My contributions to this page's references and research collection add a few lines regarding overwhelming normalization of neurophysiology and cognition in the post-acute withdrawal phase.  I believe this wiki should be cleaned up to separate out the drugs. Miyog (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcohol versus the rest
Template talk:Provinces of Cuba

message: The reason for collapsible templates is that it reduces the space these templates normally take up. Look at Havana for example and see how much the four templates take up. It is easier all round to have a default collapsed state rather than having to include the state in the article code. It doesn't bother me if you want to keep it open, but I just felt for a reader it would be better to have it collapsed and not be overwhelmed by four fully open templates. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  state=collapse
Talk:African Monetary Union

message: So basically it's going to be really important not to sit down and ask your hairdresser to spot you some cash ("Yo, gimme an afro") Sarsaparilla (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They should call it the african dollar instead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Travisvanvelzen (talk • contribs) 18:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where is reliable information that shows that the planned single African currency is going to be called "Afro"? The Abuja Treaty says nothing about the name of the currency.
I suggest this article to be moved to Single African Currency or African Monetary Union. That's how the Abuja Treaty refers to it. --filip (talk) 13:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur - the BBC News website mentions the topic a couple of times without use of the term 'Afro'. --Neo (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Three references have been added to the claim. The first two actually quote Wikipedia, thus not useful. The third one is an opinion piece calling for an "afro currency" in quotation marks - that doesn't exactly establish notability. This is really becoming an instance of Wikiality - the whole thing is spreading to other language versions of Wikipedia and to external sites as well, which are then used as references to back up the article. Absurd. This article should really be deleted or moved. --filip (talk) 00:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Cape Verde isn't so far out - the currency is already index linked to the Euro (by virtue of a former relationship with the Escudo), and it apparently has considered it. I can't find a reliable English lanugage source, but this non-reliable source links to Portuguese language sources: EuroBillTracker:Cape Verde to join the euro? --Neil (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Article 
Talk:Mick Walker (footballer, born 1940)

message: The Boston United link has been added - is this the same guy as the Notts County manager? sparkl!sm  hey! 16:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boston? 
Talk:Battle of Rozgony

message: Battle of Rozgony is a more widely used name in English according to Google Books hits: hits for Rozgony, hits for Rozhanovce. Google Scholar: 5 English hits for Rozgony, 0 for Rozhanovce. Squash Racket (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Template talk:Criminology and penology

message: Hi -- The template included as a "noinclude" :Category:Criminology.  I removed that, because a template should not be categorized in mainspace with articles. --Lquilter (talk) 17:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Why does this template exist in addition to :Template:Criminology? Jarble (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are two sidebars needed?
Talk:Matica slovenská

message: The only external link cited is the organization's official website, and that really isn't going to provide neutral content. Can somebody find other actual sources and information for this? I did a quick search for information but most of the results I got are the official website. Vdbhi (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this right?
Talk:Shoshana Zuboff

message: Though Zuboff critisizes Google broadly and substantially in her big book with good and elaborated reasons, she transmit personal data of every visitor to Google by using Google Fonts Online in the background of her webpage shoshanazuboff.com by - invisible for normal surfers - linking to fonts.googleapis.com.
Has she been taken hostage, is somebody forcing her to do that just to have nice fonts? 
She could download the same fonts legally into her webspace and use them the same way.
So, why is she informing Google of every visitor and sending personal data of him to Google? (IP and more!).
Status of at least like 12 months and until today.
You can check yourself e.g. using uBlock origin (App for Firefox) and in many other ways.
Judith Herfern
-2001:9E8:8A66:8600:C4DE:A12D:A064:1A64 (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taken as a hostage, against her will ?
Talk:Diversification (marketing strategy)

message: The Ansoff Matrix is a good visual tool to use when considering to develop a company’s market. This tool allows teams to exam the existing product, proposed new products and the market development. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ansoff

message: The Ansoff Matrix, or Ansoff Product/Market Grid is an industry standard in business strategy and marketing. Ideally it should have its own article. It is an incredibly useful tool with many books featuring it as a central theme. It is used everyday in business. I have created a user page for it which I will submit for publishing if the Ansoff Grid has not been elaborated upon, and/or given its own page within a few months. Although it will not have much of anything there just yet, you may give me your suggestions or add to it here: User:W3bj3d1/Ansoff Product-Market Grid 
Webjedi (talk) 00:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Vote for Ansoff Explanation
Talk:St Mary's Church, Cheadle

message: I've checked the links used to cite St Mary's being downgraded to a Grade I building and they seem to conflict. Images of England says that it's a Grade I building but SMBC says that it's Grade II - which is right? —PolishName 15:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Images of England is only correct up to 2001, the church has been downgraded since then. Stockport MBC are right. Nev1 (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks —PolishName 17:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The church is still listed Grade I, see here, (page 2).  The document is dated July 8th 2008. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grade I or II?
Talk:Smolenice

message: I don't understand why the terms "village" and "municipality" in the first sentence of the article are linked to descriptions of the terms.  First, these are commonly understood terms; and second, too much blue text -- signifying links -- interrupts the flow of the text. The rest of the article seems fine. It's not broken up by excessive links. --03:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary links
Talk:German submarine U-183

message: Minor item, but the article on Addu City notes the the SS British Loyalty was not a total loss. While not repaired to a seaworthy state, she was used as a floating oil storage vessel in the Maldives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.150.151 (talk) 00:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SS British Loyalty
Talk:Stephen Whitney (ship)

message: Obvious question is who the ship was named for. I did find a Stephen Whitney (1776–1860) as a likely candidate. New York merchant who made a fortune shipping cotton after the War of 1812 etc. See whitney website page but would prefer an independent source. W Nowicki (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake of?
Talk:Casualty notification

message: Should this article really be a separate one from Death notification? --Ggonnell (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I wish to bring this article's quality into question!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.39.128.47 (talk) 20:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality
Talk:The Eagle's Eye (serial)

message: #REDIRECT Talk:The Eagle's Eye
This is a notable school newspaper and should not be deleted. It has one dozens of state and national level awards. Also of note is the fact that it is created by students at Akins High School which is a majority economically disadvantaged, majority minority school. Most of the other newspapers in Texas that receive the honors that The Eagle's Eye receives are from affluent schools.
:Please stop removing the prod tag from your own article. If you do it again, this may end up in an WP:AfD. 
:Okay, now to the article. The article may not meet the notability guidelines. I do see it has awards, but I am not sure these awards are notable, and make the subject notable. This is why I put a prod on it. -Carados (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of historic aircraft of the Hellenic Air Force

message: Very few of the images are Hellenic Air Force aircraft; should the others be removed and the few Greek aircraft moved into a gallery ? MilborneOne (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Balamand declaration

message: What is the copyright status of the full text reproduced here? Barrylb (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The text of the declaration itself is not copyrighted at all.  The information was retreived from an orthodox wiki project, and afterwards edited, in order to be able to use it in WP. Stijn Calle (talk) 18:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vio?
Talk:Battle of Sanhe

message: Corrected poor English and removed excess links. Will tentatively remove quality tag.1812ahill (talk) 14:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Break the Bank (1976 game show)

message: I may be wrong about this, but I always thought that, on the ABC version, if somebody got three matching money amounts, they didn't win the total in cash plus another prize, but instead won just a prize worth $300, $600, or $900 accordingly.  - That Don Guy (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prize for winning
Talk:Wisconsin Cheeseman

message: As an employee of the new parent company of The Wisconsin Cheeseman, I fully acknowledge potential COI in wanting to update entry for the company. However, my goal here is simply to update factual information about the company, and streamline superfluous information. I am confident new information will not contain any promotional slant or self-serving purpose. 
In review of the goals/objectives of Wikipedia concerning complete neutrality, I must first question why the statement “… the company's assets were auctioned off by Rabin Worldwide” has presence here. With no ill will intended here to Rabin Worldwide, I nonetheless believe that to  name a specific auction house here has no bearing on the inherent definition or nature of The Wisconsin Cheeseman. I believe this statement only serves Rabin Worldwide promotionally. In fact, the link associated with their name is very conceivably "the gratuitious addition of a link to its site" and "an advertisement masquerading as part of an article." In defense of this, witness that its removal from this entry (or replacement with "the company's assets were auctioned off") will in no way change the core essence, history, or nature of The WIsconsin Cheeseman company provided in this entry.
This is the first point I would like to raise. Thank you.   :0) Eliassonwriter (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wisconsin Cheeseman Update Requested 
Talk:Prismacolor

message: It should be clearly noted that the term "lightfast" refers to dye colors lasting up to but not always beyond 100 years. Many dye colors are labeled with pigment names to confuse them with permanent colors that have no known lifespan when exposed to light.
:I would have to disagree with that.  Yetmotega (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

message: The Prismacolor article is written as if it was an essay to convince readers to buy from Prismacolor and not a neutral point of view. There is also parts that don't talk about the company, but are just tips for artists. A wikitable would be better suited for a listing of products instead of a review like this article has. Examples of this with other art brands like Winsor & Newton, Liquitex, Sakura, and Pentel. PlumPear (talk) (talk) 13:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire product section should be redone
Talk:Alfréd Schaffer

message: Hello,
Alfréd Schaffer was born in Bratislava, not in Budapest.
Regards
:I'm not so sure:   --necronudist (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nycteris

message: In text, there is mention of the possibility of 16 species and there 16 species listed. That's ok. But in the infobox, 17 species are listed. Is this normal ? Gimly24 (talk) 16:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh wait, nevermind. Found why ! the Species N. vinsoni is present twice in the infobox. I will change this. Gimly24 (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed ! Gimly24 (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oddity ?
Talk:Agricultural history of the United States

message: There are a lot of blank spots in this, like under: "Federal Era: 1914-1960", it has a few things under it, but they each need something and under "GATT, NAFTA and Global Trade 1960 - Present" it doesnt have anything what so ever under it, will that ever get fixed? I mean, I would try and fix it myself, but I  don't know much, I came on to figure out for a school assignment, and somebody with Wiki should probably handle it....
I added some stuff in one section.  Other people should try to fill in these wierd blanks. 71.123.66.105 (talk) 03:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wtf?
Talk:List of Chinese dishes

message: I am deleting all interwiki and adding one, since only that one relates to a List of dishes. All the others were simply links to articles about Chinese cuisine. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki

message: Chinese cuisine names was merged to List of Chinese dishes. – Wbm1058 (talk) 23:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? They're identical, two articles with the same information... --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 05:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Hui doesn't stand for Anhui (which is a common misconception), but for Huizhou...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.31.75.33 (talk) 22:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hui cuisine
Talk:Bing wan

message: Cannot find any RSs about this, and I've searched the term inside and out. English translations for "ice fruit" "iced fruits" and many other variations just bring up stuff like iced fruit-tea or other false positives. Playing around with the pinyin doesn't bring up anything. I'm thinking it's basically baobing with a few less ingredients? Cheers, Estheim (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  <strike>Merge to [[Baobing]]</strike> 

message: Per discussion on Talk:Baobing, I've struck the possibility of a merge, but in my desperate search for anything about this dessert, I finally found it as a near copy (per the Earwig tool) on a page for Beijing tourism. It's copyrighted 2002, but the text says published 2012. This article was created in 2007, and via Wayback Machine, I could not confirm if this text was on any page of the Beijing Tourism site after some hours of pouring over historical pages. 
Based on the obvious similarity, either 
# The material was copied from WP without attribution by the Beijing tourism site.
# This page copied from a Beijing tourism site page that is not in the Wayback collection.
# OR both WP and the Beijing Tourism site copied without attribution from another source.
My gut says it's more likely WP copied from the tourism site based on the fact that there is absolutely no information elsewhere talking about "Bing Guo" (and it's likely a tourism site would find any arbitrary cultural object to promote) and the English used matches the tone and topic over the whole website. The article was also created back when the WP view toward copying was vastly different from today, and I could see a good-faith assumption that an official/government-backed tourism website is not copy-right protected. The user also added a lot of similar, unsourced dishes that give me a feeling of being copied from a collection of recipes. 
I will follow up on some other boards to see if copy-vio is grounds for deletion in this case, but I wanted to explain the issue here. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peculiar Copyright Issue
Talk:Breaks, Virginia

message: Suggesting a photo of the "break" in Pine Mountain, as referenced in the article as the namesake of the community be added. Since the namesake is in reference to (and part of) the area, I think it would add value to readers on the origins of the community. Not sure a photo exists, so requesting consensus on adding a "requested photo" tag for this talk page. Respectfully, --Engineerchange (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for photo
Talk:American Family Radio

message: It has been proposed that all station specific articles for AFR stations be merged into American Family Radio. Stations which provide no local programming or other content and carry nothing but network provided programming lack sufficient notability to warrant an article. However, any station that does provide sufficient local programming or has a history (such as ownership changes) which warrants coverage, should not be merged. See WP:WPRS for more information. Any opinions or suggestions would be appreciated.--Rtphokie (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no problems in doing this. A lot of other similar stations are merged in this fashion. I don't believe any of the AFR affiliates carry sufficient local programming, but I could be wrong. Any other thoughts would help. --Milonica (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree. The radio networks all broadcast on local stations. Each station takes up precious FM or AM bandwidth, and each station is a fixture on its town or region's radio spectrum. No radio network broadcasts from a single, monolithic "source"; in order to be a network, it must have multiple local stations on board. And, under American broadcasting law, radio stations are supposed to serve local needs, so each local station (if it's not a translator) is not just an outlet pipe for a network but an entity established for the public good, even if it carries only network programming. Articles on USA radio stations should reflect that, because that's part of the nature of American radio broadcasting. Michael Patrick (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal 
Talk:Sciousness

message: The article is getting much better from all the work yesterday. I really like the additional citations, especially third party references. The citations from James are important but if he is the main source the article lacks third party commentary and neutrality. I edited one paragraph briefly to make the tone more neutral. I'd suggest adding some structure now that the page is longer, just for readability. My first-thought suggestions might be 'Critiques' to discuss other philosophers and how they commented on it, 'Conviction' to discuss how James himself may have been circumvent about proposing it or even believing it himself. Something like that. I'd really hope the article could also be expanded to include a comparison with radical empiricism in more detail, to place the ideas in relation to the philosophy he is better known for. That seems really important. Thank you for contributing to the wikipedia. - Owlmonkey (talk) 19:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements
Talk:Airside (company)

message: Why is there a Wikipedia article on a company which is noted for.... exactly nothing?
It's possible that Airside have their own paid insider to protect their page. I know that pornsites do this but......... ho hum.
If every single company had their own wikipedia page, there's never be room for anything else!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.11.98 (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any article about companies should state its significance. The present content fails to do so and it falls now under WP:CSD #11 or better known as WP:SPAM. --Efe (talk) 13:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, well nominations for BAFTAs and being featured by Apple works for me. I'll remove the template. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

message: Question on this part as this has been done. I am not sure how to respond or understand. Need Admin help.DGG Light2021 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Keep Question.
Talk:Tsinandali

message: From the article 'Crimean War', 'Caucasus theatre' section:
:"This was Prince Ellico Orbeliani whose wife was later kidnapped by Imam Shamil at Tsinandali."
Does anyone have any knowledge of this?  Should something perhaps be included here?    Heavenlyblue (talk) 03:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whose wife was later kidnapped by Imam Shamil
Talk:Guy Savoy

message: Infobox and text name two different people. Spicemix (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wife