Talk:Derringer

message: I removed the following:
"Obviously, a higher caliber derringer will have a disadvantage in width, compared to a .32 or even a .380 ACP automatic like the Kel-Tec. It is possible that customers prefer the concealment properties of a slimmer pocket automatic."
This is demonstrably false.  A derringer requires just the width of the barrel, while an automatic must be as wide as the barrel plus slide thickness.  If you put thinner grip panels on the American Derringer Model 1 in .45 Colt, you can get it down to .9" thick (the frame thickness), which is as thick as the Kel-Tec PF-9 (.88").  They don't list the frame thickness on the DA-38, but it's probably less than the Model 1 since the width with grips is .1" less (and .40 S&W is the largest caliber it's chambered in).  The .45 Colt is going to produce far better ballistics in the short barrel than the 9mm, and the .40 S&W will probably beat out the 9mm even with the shorter barrel.  scot 01:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

message: IMO a disambiguation page is needed to distinguish this derringer from "Derringer" as a name. Xinophiliac (talk) 04:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Shouldn't this be merged with the deringer article...?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.248.89 (talk) 20:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derringer 

message: Good stuff--Zubedar (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muff pistols 

message: Both spellings occur in the article. Which one is correct?
24.255.155.226 (talk) 13:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deringer versus Derringer 

message: For either myself in the future or someone else: there should be info about the High Standard derringers made in the '60s, '70s, and early '80s. They represent an advancement in that they were double-action only (DAO) and had internal strikers versus an external, exposed hammer that is more dangerous if dropped, and requires cocking for each shot. 
Some resources: 
http://www.histandard.info/models/derringers.html 
http://jamesazacharyjr.blogspot.com/2009/09/high-standard-derringer.html
They were offered in .22 LR and .22 magnum, in blue, nickel, and electroless nickel.
American Derrigner is offering copies of the original and larger framed version for larger calibers.
Phantom in ca (talk) 00:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add info re. High Standard DAO derringers 

message: I've removed several entries from the pop culture section that I felt didn't meet WP:GUNS standards. It isn't Wikipedia's job to mention every single piece of media a firearm appears in unless discussed in reliable secondary sources. Grimwol (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture 

message: This article would benefit from adding an entry (ideally with a photo) about the Christian Sharps 4-barreled pepperbox derringer. Phantom in ca (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Sharps 4-barrel Pepperbox Derringer 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Overcoat pistol. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overcoat pistol listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Old models (Deringer Piladelphia, Remington-, Colt-, and other old Deringers are Deringers, not Derringers (The Book of old Colt Firearms 1971 by Sutherland & Wilson), (Flaydermans Guide). Modern guns = Derringer -- hmaag (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Derringer is a misspelling please change it to Deringer, Deringers made by Henry Deringer are not Derringers (Photo of my DERINGER / PHILADELA), Thanks,  -- hmaag (talk) 08:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deringer, Derringer 

message: The article doesn't say what a Derringer is, in fact the entire first paragraph is dedicated to what it is not, and then only vague phrasings are used. I can't find any definition.
Mikachu42 (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it?