lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Concepcion, Romblon

message: Location in Google Earth is a mistake.  Concepcion municipality is pointing to Santa Maria, Romblon and not the municipality of Concepcion located at Maestro de Campo (or Sibale) Island.  Please correct the call-up button.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.100.241.111 (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Concepcion 
Talk:Calatrava, Romblon

message: I am very happy that someone else took the initiative to return the History of Calatrava, Romblon.  I do home that Mamaberry will not notice it and delete the article with her sharp scissors.  Kudos to the editor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.101.20.119 (talk) 06:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reposting of Calatrava History 

message: I've checked the law books and RA 38 was passed on October 1, 1946, not May 26, 1946 as given here. I'll change the text accordingly. --Ed558 (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re RA 38 
Talk:Obelism

message: I can't get Firefox or Internet Explorer to display the Unicode characters - no matter which encoding I choose. Anyone got any hints? Or is it not possible?
Jmrichardson 17:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends mostly on the font you use. I have Ubuntu/Firefox (default fonts) and half the unicode characters are displaying fine. → Aethralis 05:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to display the Unicode characters in a browser? 

message: What do the two, four, and five dot characters and the ancora mean? -- Beland (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 
Talk:Formula One video games

message: No include F1 Online: The Game. Eurohunter (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: No license titles should be removed because they are not F1 games. Eurohunter (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes no sense. Wikipedia is not a marketing exercise, illegally produced products exist and are covered on Wikipedia as well as legally licensed ones. -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 14:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No license titles
Talk:Whitesands Bay (Pembrokeshire)

message: There was one article Whitesand bay refering to two beaches one in Pembrokeshire and one in Cornwall.  It seems as if there has been some confusion. I have therefore split the articles. During the splitting process I copied the pages then edited them. In this process a bot picked up on the fact that two pages on wikipedia were the same this is why. --Benjaminevans82 17:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: split articles

message: Is the title of this article correct? I always thought it was Whitesands Bay and there are lots of references to it on the web by that name and very few that show it as Whitesand. Richerman (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitesand or Whitesands 

message: This article places Whitesands Bay in St Brides Bay. This is in conflict with the St Brides Bay article which says "...its northern limit is marked by Ramsey Island off St David's Head." This definition seems to  match the shape of the coast. I propose deleting "in St Brides Bay". Comments? Verbcatcher (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not quite that simple. Wikipedia is not a reliable source and the statement in the St Bride's Bay article is cited with a reference to the map - so someone has looked at the map and decided that St. Brides bay ends at Ramsey Island (which isn't " off St Davids Head" anyway). If you look  at the local website here it says "Whitesands Bay is a wide sandy stretch of beach in St Brides Bay, Pembrokeshire". However, I agree it doesn't appear to be in St Bride's Bay. Perhaps if we just say it's on the St David's Peninsula. Richerman   (talk) 10:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that Wikipedia is not a reliable source (that's why I posted on the talk page rather than editing the article). However, the website you cite isn't much more convincing (operated by croeso.net in Wrexham). I'm happy with the text as it is now. Thanks Verbcatcher (talk) 14:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: In St Brides Bay?
Talk:USS Yantic

message: Privateers are commissioned in times of war by a legitimate government to interrupt trade and commerce of their enemy and are thus not acting against any rules of war so long as they follow guidelines whilst seizing ships.  Pirates are not commissioned by any nation and are thus committing international crimes by interrupting commerce for no belligerents.  Labeling the Confederate ship a pirate could possible be seen as a bias.DaltonCastle (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pirate to Privateer
Talk:Zoom climb

message: During any climb (and not just zoom climb) potential energy is gained at the expense of kinetic energy. ~So, what is the point of this assertion ? JoJan 17:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong - in a steady climb thrust exceeds drag sufficiently to balance the longitudinal component of weight, such that the engines do work to increase the aircraft's potential energy.  In a zoom climb, the aircraft gains altitude while losing speed. --GCarty 13:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Alex Atala

message: This is a vanity page and should be deleted. Ashmoo 17:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What show does he host? RJFJR (talk) 01:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Host
Talk:List of aircraft used in China before 1937

message: By "used in China before 1937", are we referring to the period prior to start of the Second Sino-Japanese War on 7 July 1937? Just wondering because a fairly large number of aircraft types entered service in 1937 prior to the start of hostilities that should perhaps be listed here, if this is simply another way of saying pre-war with Japan. The challenge then is in finding when they were received as all I have are years, not months for many types. - NiD.29 (talk) 10:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1937
Talk:Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova

message: IS their official ideology really Marxism-Leninism? They are certainly not running a Leninist style of government. Is their ideological goal the attainment of a Marxist society, eventually?
:according to http://www.pcrm.md/md/program.php, yes. --Soman 10:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we shoul indeed add smth in addition to communism as ideology, i.e the political position (real). But what could it be? centre-left? 213.35.213.206 12:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As far as I see, this party claims to be a workers party, but it doesn’t act like one. This party is like the Dutch PvdA or the French Socialist Party, and others who clamed to be socialist but were in reality social democrats ( social liberals ). Moldova is not a socialist state, it is a capitalist state ruled by a communist party, like china but with a little more care for democracy. 
But even if they were communist what kind of communists are they ? Stalinists, Democratic Socialists, or Marxist Leninists ? I think they are social democrats altough they say there communists. They have betrayed socialism like all those Stalinists, Maoists, and Social Democrats. If a socialist / communist party rules a state with a capitalist system, than that party has betrayed the principals of socialism.--UDSS (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Social Democratic than Communist 

message: Can somebody please point me to the sentence(s) in the source given that say(s) the party describes itself as democratic socialist? The website describes the party as "democratic socialist", but there is no mention of the party claiming to uphold democratic socialism or describing itself as a democratic socialist party. CentreLeftRight ✉ 04:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Describes itself as democratic socialist"
Talk:Battle of the Diamond

message: Judging from the heated discussion on the guestbook of this site
^ From The formation of the Orange Order in The Orange Order from the Evangelical Truth website 
that is used as the only reference does it seem appropriate to use such a contested 'reference' #Dionysus99 17:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will reference the article before I remove the blog site. --Domer48 (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Your definitely right in your description of the article and no surprise going by who was the main editor until I rewrote the article, cutting out selectively chosen historical accounts from biased people and the obvious anti-Protestant bias in it. A lot of stuff in this article had no direct relevance to it and most of the rest is now covered in my re-written Peep o' Day Boys article, which I've linked to several times in this article. Mabuska (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I may also have more stuff to add to the article to give more details on bits and pieces. Mabuska (talk) 18:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange reference 
Talk:Sam Wyly

message: This is one of the worst articles I've ever seen on Wikipedia.  Extremely poor grammar, random capitalization, and an extraordinarily biased viewpoint.  This article was clearly written by a relative of Sam Wyly.
Update from Acb2019: after major edits on July 18th, 2019, this page still requires deeper research to remove the bias inherent in this page. I did basic edits to at least make it readable.   —Preceding undated comment added 17:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later and the article is still ridiculously hagiographic. Ashmoo (talk) 13:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Massive Edit

message: Wyly filed bankruptcy in October 2014: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-07/bankrupt-sam-wyly-sued-by-ex-wife-over-500-000-a-year-support.html. This is relevant to an article about a purportedly successful businessman. (Mr. Trump's bankruptcies are noted in his article.)
The link to the "official" web site of the brothers is now in Portuguese and appears to have no connection with them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:3BCD:D200:2D67:427E:F60F:BA38 (talk) 04:46, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the biography. Asav | Talk 14:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy 

message: On 31 May 2018 and 4 June 2018 user RNPRContent made 15 edits to the page, they had never edited before and have never edited since. As far as I can tell there are issues with all of those edits (some are unsourced anecdotes from the subjects life, others minimize any and all negative language in the article, some delete whole unfavorable paragraphs without explanation). Their first edit was flagged by ClueBot NG which (should have been a red flag) which has a very low false positive rate (I don’t believe this to be a false positive). The page’s neutral point of view appears to have been compromised. I’m relatively new to Wikipedia, whats to be done when an article has been vandalized this extensively? It seems like undoing all 15 edits would leave the page even more of a mess given the edits that have been made since. I really don’t have the time to pour over this piece by piece and restore it to a neutral position, but it seems a shame to let whatever happened here stand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horse Eye Jack (talk • contribs) 11:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did this page get vandalized?
Talk:Julian Waters

message: Please note that information contained in Wikipedia must not be original research, especial when the article is a biography of a living person. Therefore, please provide sources. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Please also see Wikipedia's guidelines concerning autobiographies and conflicts of interest. Thanks. --Evb-wiki 17:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not remove autobio & unref'ed tags without fixing the problem. Doing so is considered vandalism. Even after deleting most of the text, it leaves the article unreferenced, and the remaining text was still written by the subject himself. Adding sources would probably solved both issues. Thanks. --Evb-wiki 19:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Even autobiographies need to be sourced
Talk:Karagöz and Hacivat

message: I've taken this from a stub to a decent start on an article. If someone wants to expand this further, Emin Senyer's multilingual site http://www.karagoz.net looks like a very good source, which I've only very minimally exploited. - Jmabel | Talk 17:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potentially useful source

message: an Arab who knows no Turkish
:Ottoman or Turkish? Mallerd 13:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish 

message: The last link at the end of the page, the link to the movie page, is translated wrong. Turkish it's name is "Hacivat ve Karagöz Neden Öldürüldü?" which means "why were Hacivat and Karagöz killed?," not "who killed Hacivat and Karagöz".Not such a big thing, however.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.5 (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The translation fault 

message: I'm removing this. --Mttll (talk) 14:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far fetched paragraph with no source 

message: It can not be merge, because Karagöz is Turkish original, Karagiozis is the Greek version...
Buzancar (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Merge

message: * Support - the proposed merge seems to be common sense, since the names are the same and both articles cite that the character is not restricted to any one country. Ithinkicahn (talk) 07:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Big Brother 4 (Bulgarian season)

message: If the nominations will swap everyweek between genres, I think we might swap EXEMPT to NOT ELIGIBLE, as in Secret Story/Loft Story in France and Canada. --BigOz22 (talk) 00:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominations 

message: I am moving this article into the C-class section, as I regularly update most of the information there, and I think that it contents the most important things. --85.11.172.36 (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article doesn't qualify for C-class just yet. There are some formatting issues that are holding the article back from C-class. Please see Big Brother 10 (U.S.), Big Brother 2009 (UK) & Big Brother Australia 2008 as some examples. Also there shouldn't be numbers in the nominations table and a note about how the nomination process works in this series should be placed above the table. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 18:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a note above the table and removed the numbers. Worldofbb (talk) 19:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: C-class
Talk:Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum

message: I recently received an email from the museum saying they are changing their name to the Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum. I am currently trying to find a suitable source/reference to support making that change here; I suppose the museum's Facebook page or Twitter is not good enough...?  Invertzoo (talk) 00:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bailey-Matthews National Shell Museum
Talk:Fiction set in the Roman Empire

message: I thank the editors for preparing this article. patsw 17:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful article

message: There is very much of an overlap between thus page and Fiction set in ancient Rome, in my view they should be merged.There are some works which begin in the time of the Roman Republic and go on to the Empire. Two separate articles just make for a big confusion. Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Very much agree. Please merge them (into Fiction set in ancient Rome with this article becoming a mere redirect). --Fixuture (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge!
Talk:New Zealand Derby

message: The list here relates to the Great Northern Derby (race) prior to 1973. The New Zealand Derby was run in Riccarton prior to 1973. Wallie (talk) 19:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual List?

message: Was the New Zealand Derby really inferior to the Great Northern Derby? I think they were effectively the same level. Both attracted top horses. Wallie (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?
Talk:Huarizo

message: There is also a Misti, which is a hybrid of a male llama and a female alpaca.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:2D30:385C:95E4:1CAC:D3E0 (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other hybrid 

message: Are huarizos fertile? Or are they, like mules, unable to reproduce? -- 17:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We really need a citation for the University of Minnesota Rochester research that is referenced in nearly every huarizo piece across the internet--but nowhere to be found in scientific literature publicly accessible/available. There are several other cases of hybridization among animals that confer irreversible sterility onto male members and so it would be quite some news if there was evidence suggesting ways to get around this block. 2603:3015:1020:2100:25E3:BCC2:BCD4:FAEE (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fertility 

message: You sure they're not "bred for their skills in magic"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.245.164.72 (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweet skills.... 

message: The following comments made by User:Emhartain moved from the article: 
Personal information - From Douglas Vernon, Owner of aplacas and extensive researcher on Alpaca/Llama/Huarizo stock.  This article is incorrect in its assumption that Huarizo are sterile.  They are, in fact, a most amzazing breed, Alpacs, Llamas and Vicuna and Guanaco.  Male Alpaca that breed to female Llama usually result in a more desirable Huarizo.  However, breeding female alpaca to male Llama will sometimes lead to large offspring, causing birth defect, stillbirth and other birthing complications.
 	
Guanaco and Vicuna are the wild ancestors of Alpaca (assumed and partially proven) but all of them are also able to breed with the other; Llama, Vicuna, Guanaco and Alpaca, all successfully producing fertile young.  The Huarizo, offspring of a Llama/Alpaca mating, generally have more pleasant dispositions as well as longer, finer, softer hair.
Thanks, Steven Walling • talk  19:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article
Talk:Cogan syndrome

message: * Philippe Vinceneux: Cogan's syndrome Orphanet.
* Cogan's syndrome Aetna InteliHealth.
* David Glendenning Cogan 
* The Career of David G. Cogan, MD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristopheS (talk • contribs) 15:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other good sources 

message: ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate?), WBC (White blood cell?) and C-reactive protein  need an explanation or a wiki-link.  --ChristopheS (talk) 15:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of medical terminology 

message: Better references?
* M.H. Majoor, F.W. Albers, R. van der Gaag, F. Gmelig-Meyling, E.H. Huizing. Corneal autoimmunity in Cogan's syndrome? Report of two cases. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology (Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol). 1992 Aug;101(8):679-84.
* E.W. St Clair, R.M. MacCallum. Cogan's syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1999 Jan;11(1):47-52.
* C. Lunardi, C. Bason, M. Leandri, R. Navone, M. Lestani, E. Millo, et al. Autoantibodies to inner ear and endothelial antigens in Cogan’s syndrome. The Lancet,  Volume 360, Issue 9337, Pages 915 - 921, 21 September 2002. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11028-2.
* S. Benvenga , F. Trimarchi , A. Facchiano. Cogan's syndrome as an autoimmune disease. The Lancet, Volume 361, Issue 9356, Pages 530 - 53. (8 February 2003: Correspondence). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12478-6
--ChristopheS (talk) 16:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypothesis of autoimmune disease 
Talk:Copenhagen disease

message: Our goals for this article include:
* Enhance description of Copenhagen disease in the introductory paragraph
* Add images to this article
* Add Clinical Presentations section with Signs and Symptoms
* Add Diagnosis section
* Add Clinical Presentations section
* Add examples of case studies of patients with Copenhagen disease
* Add Treatment and Management section
Not many secondary sources are available at this time. Primary literature and other sources will be used. Future editors may improve this article with better sources as they become available. D. Doan (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations 2 2020, Group 11 Goals & Proposed Edits 

message: The groups' edits do substantially improve the article. The article consisted of only 2 sentences and 1 reference before. It now contains 6 sections and 11 references. 
Although they did not complete their goal of adding images, they did complete their other goals of adding in sections like clinical presentation, diagnosis, examples of case studies and more that they did not plan on originally adding like prognosis. 
The draft submission does reflect a neutral point of view. Most of the information written is from a factual and scientific point of view like the signs and symptoms, treatment, etc. The only section that can potentially be biased is the clinical studies section, but the authors state that there is not many secondary sources available due to the rarity of the disease. 
SMohebbi95 (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review by group 12
Talk:Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita

message: User:Tattycakes per you email have indicated ICD per --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: icd
Talk:Bahoz Erdal

message: Are there any pictures of this guy? Baristarim 23:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are quite a few that can be found on Google - but none of them are freely-licensed, and I'm not sure a military officer who acts as a spokesman would meet the criteria for being "irreplacable" enough for Fair Use. I won't dispute it if you do add an image (google around, you'll find them), but I'm not going to do so myself. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  01:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: It is written in the article that Bahoz was interviewed by Al Jazeera but the link given does not lead to Aljazeera so this is a false information. --2003:8B:8F70:58C6:A5DD:1201:EE7D:9563 (talk) 14:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information 