lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:French Gothic architecture

message: For this article, there should be a description of the four periods of French Gothic architecture: Early Gothic, High Gothic, Rayonnant, and Flamboyant (also Late Gothic).  It should explain the differences between the styles as well as note what concepts were unchanged.
= Since stubs for Rayonnant and Flamboyant already exist, I will expand those into proper articles rather than trying to squeeze everything in here. Quite apart from the size issue, I feel it would be wrong to include those two 'styles' under a specifically French regional heading because although they originated there, they both became important architectural styles outside France too (particularly in the Holy Roman Empire).
StuartLondon (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Rayonnant and Flamboyant can hold articles on their own. MathKnight Gothic Israeli Jew 15:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

message: :I suggest that the material pasted below be incorporated into this article, as it appears to contain some information not in the article already. 
:It properly belongs here and is much too singly focussed upon the architectutre of France to occupy the major space in the article Gothic architecture from which it has been removed.  
:Amandajm (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion from generic article  

message: I'm afraid that the recent additions to the lead , describing the four periods of the style,  are too technical for the lead,  and seem written for architecture graduate students. not the broader Wikipedia audience. I respectfully suggest that this part of the lead should be shortened and made clearer, without the technical terms, so it can be understood by non-specialists. The technical terms can be explained in the sections on the different periods. 
Also, it's not entirely clear how High Gothic fits into this. It's the most commonly-used term ins the sources that I've seen. Shouldn't it be explained?  
Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making the lead more readable
Talk:Community leader

message: I doubt this neologism is really notable enough outside academic sociology. VanTucky Talk 04:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: When a newspaper says "community leaders" did this-and-that, who is being referred to? The clergy? Freemasons? Businessmen? I've seen this in American news stories as well as British ones. 184.57.129.13 (talk) 11:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  So who exactly are these "community leaders"? 

message: Jaja 2800:98:10C3:C227:A947:4AC9:16C1:FC10 (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaja
Talk:Vesperian Sorrow

message: a family of four  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.64.97.6 (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh...?? FireCrystal (talk) 00:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  andres triana  
Talk:Dwarf Athletic Association of America

message: Hello, I created this Article today and feedback would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks in advance!  Josborne2382 04:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation
Talk:Sphincter urethrae

message: "Human males have much stronger sphincter muscles than females, meaning that they can retain a large amount of urine for twice as long, as much as 800mL"
This statement is far too simplistic.  Bladder capacities vary enormously in both males and females.  Women have very strong pelvic floor muscles (because they are needed for childbirth) and some women can hold over a litre of urine. Biscuittin 14:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality disputed
Talk:Deep Fathom

message: Plz DO NOT edit this page yet. Voshvoshka 05:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Progress

message: Can someone get a picture plz whenever i do it the wikibastards blok it Voshvoshka 03:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: This is the funniest plot summary ever. Can the novel really be this insane? 70.90.143.153 (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hilarious
Talk:Yu Yu Hakusho season 1

message: I've nominated this article for featured list status. Please improve it in any fashion possible or comment in the nomination above. Regards, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 05:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Lao Song

message: I just noticed this page, which aside from not citing any sources, seems to be a duplicate of :Tai Dam people. The Thai language page of Tai Dam people :th:ชาวไทดำ mentions "Lao Song" under the section Tai Dam people in Thailand. Should this page be turned into a redirect to :Tai Dam people? --Glennznl (talk) 10:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like they speak related but distinct languages. I added links, but this is not anything I'm familiar with. — kwami (talk) 13:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible duplicate page
Talk:Nipple Ring-Ring Goes to Foster Care

message: I removed the part that stated "Foxxy assumes her tormenter is Daffy Duck." After watching the episode, I can see how someone could have made that mistake. Foxxy does not say "Daffy!" She says "Dat's it," as in a way that African-Americans sometimes pronounce "That's it." The two do sound similar, but in this case she's not accusing Daffy. If a Daffy reference is noted (and later in the entry you can find one) it should be made only in the sense that Daffy went through what Foxxy went through and that the entire scene is almost sight-for-sight, word-for-word a parody of that scene from Duck Amuck. --Iwriteu 05:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is fine, but taking that out without rewording the sentence meant that the pronoun "she" no longer has an antecedent.Raymondluxuryacht 05:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just FYI
Talk:Star Wraith

message: Most websites mentioning the games use arabic instead of roman numerals to designate sequels. Also, StarWraith is typically spelled Star Wraith. SharkD (talk) 01:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed some of this. I can't believe nobody created redirects for the articles! That was one of the first things I thought of when I created the Star Wraith II and Star Wraith III articles.75.45.202.137 (talk) 03:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: I think that Star Wraith (Star Wraith 1) should have an article. I think I will create one. Jaychant (talk) 02:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wraith article (the first Star Wraith) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 02:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 December 2021
Talk:Trial of Penenden Heath

message: The lead quotes Ireland in settling for "about 1072" but there are a few issues with this.
* The Wikipedia article on Odo gives 1076 for the trial, quoting Ireland.
* This article states that Arnost was there as bishop of Rochester.  Siward died in 1075 and was suceeded by Arnost who died within a year.  Reference is again Ireland.
* The Wiki article on Arnost, quoting Fryde, gives the date of Arnot's consecration as 1076 with his death later in the year.
* Hasted in The History and Topographical Survey of Kent, Volume IV, p86 gives the date as 1076.
* The Cooper article (reference on main page) states: "A certain terminus a quo is offered by the inclusion of Arnost as bishop of Rochester among the witnesses, which pushes the creation of AB at least as late as 1075".
I have therefore ammended the lead to 1076, but have left the original referencfe in place in case this is proved to be more reliable.  Please feel free to revert, but add your reasoning here. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this. I wrote the original article over 4 years ago now and can't recall why I chose 1072, so am happy to cede to an editor who has made more recent analysis of the dates. Thanks Dick G (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 
Talk:Liberty Bay

message: Why is the title of this article "Liberty Bay," and not "Dogfish Bay?"  I understand that the name Liberty Bay is common usage, but that the official name is Dogfish Bay.  If this is correct then I think this page should be moved to "Dogfish Bay" with a redirect for the colloquial name.  After all, we wouldn't want the article for Bummertown and it's residents, the Bremelow, to be titled by the common usage.Michael J Swassing 06:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Air travel

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: 'The difference between Economy and First Class when travelling by rail is often not as much...'
In my opinion, this does not refect a global viewpoint, for example here in the UK what on here is described as 'Economy' is generally referred to as 'Standard' or 'Standard Class' - I'm unsure as to how it is known in the US or Asia, however. Would like opinions on a possible change. --79.66.61.40 (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:BOLD. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Viewpoints? 

message: Both this article and Commercial aviation cover much of the same material if any future Wikipedians are interested. DHHornfeldt (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Commercial aviation 

message: Just a heads-up that as part of an editathon I'm leading on June 17, new editors might be making some edits to this article. I'll be following up shortly afterwards to check for copyright compliance and other quality issues and will clean up stuff if needed. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 23:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editathon June 17
Talk:George Leonard

message: One book about George's life is "Esalen:  America and the Religion of No Religion." I suggest including it as a "book about" the subject.
MWS (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Template talk:British Isles thumbnail map

message: Hi Ras52, is there any way you can add an image that highlights Cornwall?  All of the UK-based portals use flags for the navigation to related portals (e.g. see Portal:Wales/Related portals), and I would like to use these images instead.  Thanks, Andrwsc 06:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: .  Do you think it could benefit from a circle to highlight its location, much as the Channel Islands and Isle of Man have one?  — ras52 11:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Yeah, looking at the finished result, the amount of red does appear to be a bit small.  I think the red highlight circle would help.  Thanks again, Andrwsc 16:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested addition
Talk:Wind power in China

message: The line that reads "The National People's Congress permanent committee passed a law that requires the Chinese energy companies to purchase all the electricity produced by the renewable energy sector.[11]" cannot be verified as the citation has nothing to do with the NPC or any laws passed. (April 11, 2013)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.68.6.172 (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: *To Conquer Wind Power, China Writes the Rules by Keith Bradsher published December 14, 2010.  99.190.87.151 (talk) 00:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[NYT]] resource from 2010? 

message: Add link to List of wind turbine manufacturers.  99.35.12.74 (talk) 06:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add link to [[List of wind turbine manufacturers]]? 

message: Hello, I believe that citation number 28 seems incorrect. After clicking on the link, I found that the site did not specify if the goal was reached. The closest thing I could find was a sentence saying "Wind power capacity reached 105 gigawatts by the end of June this year." This article was published on Oct 17, 2015. FangedZebra (talk) 02:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I removed the citation since it's not necessary. The source for the 100GW in 2014 is given right after. (also moved the discussion to a new section) --Ita140188 (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:X10 accelerated floppy drive

message: It is difficult to find information on the internet for items 1996 and older. If a Google search does not turn up any info on something I feel it is time to post some information about it. Yes, a groups search on a specific term did get few results. 
This X-10 drive is something I feel should be remembered. That is my inspiration and reason for creating this article. It hit the market when a replacement or improvement to the floppy was long overdue. CDR's and Zip drives were addressing this. 10 years later the floppy is still around and still slower than it has to be!  
I would like to see the others that worked on this project credited for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Holidaypepsi (talk • contribs) 
:Nice article, but it needs to be cleaned up a bit, especially exclamation marks and "happy" remarks. EpiVictor 14:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the drive was just too late: 1996 Hard Disks and CD-ROMs where used much more often than floppy drives and prbably most people just didn't want to spend 100$ or 150$ just to replaye their normal floppy drive with a faster one, because they didn't use the drives often enough anymore. Btw, the X10 Ffloppy also used the X speed notation of CD-ROM dives. --MrBurns (talk) 13:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About This Article 
Talk:Balance (accounting)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: * Anyone who has ever owed a bill or a debt will know that the balance in accounting is very notable and needs to be described. 9 articles and an ordinary talk page link to thia article, so some sort of page is needed here. We earlier had this sort of controversy with article Vial. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?
Talk:Gamers: The Movie

message: I have also found this Chris Folino, which is created by the same wiki author and have tagged it.
All I can find on the movie itself is this http://digg.com/movies/_Gamers:_The_Movie_Teaser_Trailer, which is not much. Nzv8fan 07:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

message: What does 'maxing out' mean? Can this be put in standard English please? Alpheus (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maxing out

message: Concerns about a possible conflict of interest regarding this article and its creator and most frequent contributor have been raised at WP:COIN. —Whoville (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest
Talk:Kronoberg Regiment

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Fraser (surname)

message: Recently the file :File:Alexander Fraser, 16th Baron Saltoun by William Salter.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to one of the not-yet-created articles linked from here. If you create the article on this guy, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 21:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Alexander Fraser, 16th Baron Saltoun by William Salter.jpg]] 

message: Steve Fraser, 
- The Age of Acquiescence, 
- The Limousine Liberal: How an Incendiary Image United the Right and Fractured America  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.37.137 (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Fraser, Author 

message: How come, the name is often pronounced as "frasure"? KhlavKhalash (talk) 18:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Bog standard

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: As the linked article shows, there are many ideas about the source of this phrase, please reference any other cites Alastairward (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please cite your sources 

message: This page is a mere dictionary definition (something which Wikipedia is [[WP:WINAD|not). It explains the meaning of a phrase and has a minor (and uncertain) usage note.  Options to fix it include: 
# Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical. 
# Redirect the page to a more general discussion of the appropriate sub-genre of slang. 
# Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the  template). 
Pending a better answer, I'm implementing option 3 for now. Rossami (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or redirect
Talk:Joey Arias

message: Joey Arias was born October 3, 1949 according to his IMDb page. Let's stop removing it. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0034700/a
96.246.162.192 (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to this NYT article: "He has lived even more lives than these. He was born in North Carolina 50-plus years ago. (Though fond of exaggeration, Mr. Arias adheres to the show-biz tradition of tastefully understating one’s age. “I’m a time traveler,” he added helpfully.)"  Jooojay (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: It's not Z chromosome but Z CHROMOZOME with a Z.
It's a short film project written & directed by Manfred T. MUGLER (aka Thierry MUGLER, starring Joey ARIAS. Produced by Unreel Productions Paris. to be released for the premiere at the gay film festival "Cheries-Cheris" in Paris the 5 of October 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.128.239.199 (talk) 09:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I've moved this text here from the article:
Google searches indicate that "Z chromosomes" do not occur in humans, though you may know better - if so, a citation is required for this one! If true, we can't have "rare unique" - it can't be both, which is it? Also, one "n" in "persona" - come to that, the whole item needs re-writing. Nortonius (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Z chromosome?! 
Talk:Miscellaneous solo piano compositions (Rachmaninoff)

message: A clear article that does a nice job of bringing together a disparate set of works. However, I think a few expansions are necessary:
*The lead needs to summarize the article in more depth per WP:LEAD and the sentences need to have parallel structure - they are grammatically incorrect right now.
*In the autumn of 1885, Rachmaninoff, at the age of 12, entered the home of Nikolai Zverev to receive private piano instruction, and while residing with his teacher, he was subject to his training regimen and rigorous practice schedule. - The pronouns start to become confusing here.
*No. 3 in C minor took more than a month to compose, dated from December 3 to January 12, and is highly Robert Schumann-esque, with a chordal texture spread over the entire keyboard. - break into two sentences
*Do we know why he had to write the fugue/canon?
*More musical information on the Canon in D, the Prelude in F, the Morceau de Fantaisie, and the Fughetta would greatly enhance the article, as the reader doesn't learn much about them. 
I am placing this article on hold for a week so that the editors can address these issues. I look forward to re-reviewing it. Awadewit | talk 02:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead is giving me trouble, because no collective statements have been made about this group as a whole. I'm not sure what else to say for it. In my references nothing more is said about the Prelude in F, and since IMSLP is shut down I can't have a look at the score, if it would be up there. But from what I have, the other pieces have more information now. Thanks for taking a look and editing some yourself, I appreciate it. ALTON .ıl 05:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead doesn't necessary have to be a comprehensive statement about all of the pieces, but perhaps it could give a better idea of just what the pieces are by naming some of their styles and titles, for example? Awadewit | talk 09:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *The slower andante is a gentle section, influenced by Pyotr Tchaikovsky - which of the two andante sections? Awadewit | talk 09:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: *I did some more copy editing - feel free to change any of it back. Awadewit | talk 09:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I've added a mention about some pieces. The editing you've done was nothing but an improvement. ALTON .ıl 00:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better - passing now. Awadewit | talk 01:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Awadewit. What a quality article you've made it. ALTON .ıl 01:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA hold

message: The first paragraph of the article states incorrectly that the Oriental Sketch was written late in Rachmaninoff's life. In fact, Rachmaninoff himself gave the first public performance, at Juilliard, in November, 1931. The piece was written long before that, in 1917. See for example http://imslp.org/wiki/Oriental_Sketch_%28Rachmaninoff,_Sergei%29. 
DonaldMWright (talk) 09:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Oriental Sketch
Talk:Africa Hinterland

message: This article appears to have been created from a dramatised movie.  Consequently, some of the facts are dubious, and there's a complete lack of references.
Actually is not from a dramatised movie, but a documentary which interviewed many of the participants. It has been shown a number of times on SABC TV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozinsky (talk • contribs) 19:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with previous comments.  It was not a movie.  There was some re-enactment, but it was mostly narrated and had interviews with previous workers and passengers.--Dmol (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The OP is most likely referring being used like "brave young man"....--41.151.106.111 (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

text: The article currently has a references needed tag on it, and these are all relevant references to add to support the content Extua (talk) 09:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "Facts"