Talk:Runaway (dependent)

message: I have to doubt the number of runaways in the United States:
"It is estimated that each year there are between 1.3 and 1.5 million runaway and homeless youth in the United States (Coco & Courtney, 1998; Cauce et al., 1994)."
There are about 74 million people under the age of 18 in the US .  The stat above says that 1.5 million of them will run away every year, which is 2.02%.  Now imagine a cohort of children (a group of kids the same age).  In the 18 years it takes for our cohort to become adults, 36.5% of them will run away?  Perhaps the same kids will run away several times, but that still seems like a huge number. 32.97.110.142 19:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm doubting that one too. I live in LA -- and while you do see a lot of homeless people and mentally ill (it's inevitable!) -- I rarely, if ever, have seen a runaway kid. ― LADY GALAXY ★彡  Refill/lol 18:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree that the 1.5 million stat is a bit dubious, I think you're misreading it a little.  It claims that every year there will be 1.5 million runaways, not that there will be 1.5 million new runaways.  I think the "each year" bit is there to illustrate the ongoing nature of the problem. --Ddawn23 09:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: More importantly, you can't just say 36.5% will run away.  Certain types of kids in certain situations are likely to runaway.  As for why you don't see them, you probably do.  Unlike the mentally ill or elderly homeless people (especially men), they often still care about what others think of them and take great pains to at least appear semi-clean.  How can you tell that the teenager you saw wondering around the mall wasn't shopping but was actually killing time until enough people clear out of the bus depot that he or she can sleep there?  A good way to prevent your children running is to keep a good relashinship with them and to know what is hapening in there lives. - 67.166.139.181 07:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fishy Stats

message: have citations, or external links to prove that the citations there are real.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.195.167 (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of the statistics 

message: means to love some one and to love forever 
means to not runaway or nothing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.248.185 (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  love 

message: it is stated that it is a midemenor and called "harboring a runaway". yet in a recent case (http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3455835) it was called 'kidnapping', and the person in question faces 25 years in prison. obviouly a felony. a serious one. 
it is also important to note that nothing sexual is mentioned here. and equally important, with their ages (15 and 18) sex would be permissable  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.135.219 (talk) 03:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: crime for helping a runnaway

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Runaway (dependent). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050226125952/http://ndaa.org/pdf/parental_kidnapping.pdf to http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/parental_kidnapping.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article claims this and cites this page, but I just read it and don't see that fact anywhere. The only similar quote is "Also noted in the congressional report, females are more likely than males to run away,". Should the statistic be removed or a new citation found? --Aabicus (talk) 10:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I'm going to rephrase it as I think the statistic is wrong as stated. The article cites this congressional report, which in turn cites this 2010 report which lists a mere 2% difference between male and female runaway percentages. --Aabicus (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "75% of runaways are female"