lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diogo Cão

message: I want to add an external link to <http://www.namibia-1on1.com/Namibia-Coastal/Diogo-Cao.html> Are there any objections or suggestions?
Keith Irwin 06:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: "...one of the most remarkable navigators..."
This one definitely needs fixing. I'd suggest using "notable" instead. Ruodyssey (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV phrase in lede

message: The article says: "the Cape Cross padrão is now at Kiel". Actually, it is in Berlin, in the Deutsches Historisches Museum. It can be seen on-line at:
 http://www.dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?seite=5&fld_0=RB000067
Ventim (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nowadays location of the Cape Cross padrão 
Talk:Battle of Raichur

message: I doubt that bahmanids can take Raichur in 1323 because this dinasty don't started until 1347. --79.159.174.25 (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1323

message: Somehow this article does not look like a battle article. It starts with saying that Raichur is a small town in Karnataka. Moreover it does not have an infobox. I am making changes such as adding infobox and citing references. Further, I will also try and make this article sound like a battle rather than a story. Please do not make abrupt changes without posting on talk page.
Amit20081980 13:03, 16 Jan 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Missing

message: I am taking up this article for re-drafting to tackle any possible copyright issues. I will re-publish once done.
User:Amit20081980 talk 10:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Taking up for revision

message: , I am copying your new passage about Pemmasani Ramalinga Nayudu for discussion:
* I don't see which source names him as the "Chief-Commander".
* Which source says that he led the Vijayanagara charge at the Battle of Raichur?
* I also don't see how any of the citations for the last sentence are supposed to be about the Battle of Raichur.
Please explain. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Kautilya3 I have included new citations since you felt the previous ones were not sufficient. One of my previous citations clearly mentioned that Pemmasani led his troops at the Battle of Raichur (""Ramalingatiayudu, who succeeded his father, was one of the most redoubtable warriors- in the court of Krishnadgvarlya. ... Rachuru (Raichur) and other strong places with his [Pemmasani Ramalinga] own men") - Journal of Andhra Historical Society. In regards to the the last three citations, they were to show Krishandevaraya's appreciation of his bravery and historians perspective on it. Since he was the Chief-Commander, he likely led the assault at Raichur since he was there, as well. Again, if you feel further improvements can be made, please let me know. As always, feel free to check my citations as I am a newer editors. Thank you. Timmarasu (talk) 02:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pemmasani Ramalinga Nayudu
Talk:Likoma Island

message: What currency is used here? Malawian kwacha or Mozambican metical? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (This is unreferenced as it is my personal experience on the island) Malawian kwacha is used, as Likoma is, in all respects, Malawi. BTW, as people speak english and not portuguese, I think the people in Likoma has actually few relationships with the Mozambicans. Moongateclimber (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currency 
Talk:Dhaka Nawab dynasty

message: The following names may be added back when their notability is clarified. Otherwise this article would become infested with hundreds of thousands of members of the family, ranging from beggars to bank robbers.
*Khwaja Mohammed Kaiser (Diplomat)
*Ali Kaiser Hasan Morshed (Diplomat)
*Syed Khwaja Alqama (Political Scientist)
*Khwaja Mohammed Kaiser (Diplomat)
*Ali Kaiser Hasan Morshed (Diplomat)
*Syed Khwaja Belal Hassan (International Civil Servant)
*Khwaja Anas (Accountant) 
*Khwaja Arshad (Accountant)
*K.M. Manzoor (Doctor)
*K.M. Moiz (Doctor)
*Talha Raziuddin (Doctor)
*Ovais Zubair (Doctor)
*Syed Ali Madani (Doctor)
Please, do not add names indiscriminately. Not all doctors and diplomats and civil servants have a claim to notability. There are millions of them around the world right at this moment (and, we haven't even got to counting the dead ones). Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of people
Talk:Anti-Dühring

message: Regarding the use of "Herr": Herr could be translated into Lord or Sir, giving Lord Eugene Dühring, giving it more meaning to it in English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PMAverageMe (talk • contribs) 10:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As a native German speaker and professional translator, I say you are completely mistaken. Herr in this context means Mister and nothing else. With similar reasoning you might translate Eugen into Well-born and Dühring into Thuringian. Also, a lordship is something specifically British, and Dühring was a commoner. Keeping Herr untranslated (but uninflected) in the title is defensible but by no means necessary.--2.200.163.53 (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "Herr"
Talk:Apocalypse of Paul

message: This might be the actual text?
https://books.google.com/books?id=zmpgCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA84&ots=greUD76-lr&pg=PA85#v=onepage&q=part%20vi&f=false  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.54.8 (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Appendix Vergiliana

message: I removed the stub notice because the article has been fleshed out some. Hope you enjoy!Jdf8 (talk) 04:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worked on this article 

message: This doesn't appear to be Biography related, so I have removed that project banner.  Rpyle731talk 07:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPBIO? 

message: You're having a laugh! In the poem the phrase is "color est e pluribus unus"
There's an "a pluribus unum" in Cicero. But it sounds like a commonplace to me, and most likely came from Heraclitus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_pluribus_unum 
I see they mention that. The point is, the French guy who supplied the Latin may well have known his moretum and used the Latin as a springboard, but no more than that!
Vince Calegon 14:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the claim in the article was unsourced -- or at least did not have an inline citation -- I have removed it. MPS1992 (talk) 21:37, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

text: just to mention, I also agree with your reasoning that this unsourced claim was also highly implausible. For what it's worth, it seems to have been added by an unregistered editor nearly two years ago. The IP address used seems to belong to a hospital, although this may not be accurate. MPS1992 (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  e pluribus unum 

message: Can anyone explain why the article does not cover other poems included in the Oxford Classical Text such as the Priapeum 'Quid hoc novi est?' and 'De est et non' etc.? Is it still under construction or is there a reason for the omission? If the former, could a stub at least be left at the bottom mentioning the poems still to be covered? Kanjuzi (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing poems
Talk:Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography

message: "Unrated" indeed! I have emended and expanded this article, which is the subject of current somewhat clumsy and unexplained undertakings by Wikipedia Administrators, that seem to be stripping all references to the untrustworthy Appleton's Cyclopedia from Wikipedia. The details, with some quite unimaginable further modern twists and turns inserted in on-line "versions" of Appleton's, can be followed:
*Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/famousamericans.net 
*Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2007, Nov 13
*Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, under the heading "Virtualology and Stanley L. Klos -- boon to our historical articles or just a bain of spam?' Starting 8 December 2007 and following days (This thread will soon be archived).
--Wetman (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the blanket statements about Appletons' being "unreliable" certainly pop up.  Having worked with it for a year, I think it is a reliable source for United States and North American subjects, as Chandler states, and there is much that is difficult to obtain elsewhere.  The only qualification I have seen from a close student of Appletons' is by Chandler, and she states that articles on Latin American subjects should be corroborated, and that otherwise it is a reliable source.  Even for Latin American subjects, there is much of value to be found. I did see a general statement, "Beware of Appleton's [sic]" by G.S., but this is very vague, and his mispunctuating of the title leads me to suspect he doesn't have much direct experience with the work. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Effacing Appleton's

message: Why are we deleting all the references to Appleton's? If you don't like the links to Klos, remove the links ... and replace with the Google books version, but don't delete the references ... that's just, well stupid ... Why is it ok, to link to the New York Times archive, and not link to Klos's scanned version? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting

message: I don't understand why there shouldn't be at least links to online copies in the article.
One copy is published by well-renowned Archive.org, scanned with support from MSN: . I think linking it is a Good Thing. --Alvestrand (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online copy 

message: In addition to the seventh volume supplement issued in 1901, the other six volumes were periodically updated with a final release in 1900.  I state this just from inspection, and will keep an eye out for a verifiable ref on this matter until which time this note will suffice. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:Arban method

message: I removed the "Editions" section from the article because it only mentions the four editions by Carl Fischer, and leaves out the original edition (published 1864), the edition pictured at the top of the article (1879), and countless others. The section is incomplete, USA-centric, and borders on an advertisement for the Carl Fischer "Platinum Edition". --dbolton (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arcades Project

message: Just for the record, this isn't related to sociology.  If anything it would be classified as literary theory, perhaps philosophy. 72.8.95.34 07:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To add to the above, I've just seen an interview led by Alexander Kluge with a literary critic  where they're both saying that had it been completed, it woulda been one of 20th century's most fundamental works of philosophy, historical, sociological, and political analyses, and that Benjamin's basic thesis in it is that the reason why the 20th century is going down the drain between 1910 and 1940 (world wars, the failure of the 1918 German revolution, rise of fascism) is because we haven't properly understood the 19th century, its dreams, aims, and ambition yet, or in short the "dream" that it was, both in the meaning of the utopias that it brought forth but also its fundamental delusions and its lack of understanding of itself (both in how the conscious Ego cannot be aware of its unconscious Id impulses, and in how eras can only be understood in hindsight, in a historian's perspective), in a socio-political and socio-psychological context and with strong overtones of Marxist analysis and Freudian mass psychology. In short, because people hadn't learned the lessons of the 19th century yet and were still in an unconscious, pre-Enlightened collective "dream" state, the 20th century was going down the drain, and Benjamin's ambition with the Arcades Project was to unearth the unconscious collective lessons of the 19th century "dream". Each chapter was to be devoted to a historical French figure as the archetype of a certain socio-political and socio-economic milieu and a corresponding age or era within the 19th century. All that combined into an original, materialist theory of history, which Tiedemann in his preface defines as that according to Benjamin, we can never understand any historical event while it is in progress, only in hindsight when we know its outcome, its consequences for our present time, that we must analyze the differences between the past's original promises, how it came to fail in delivering upon these promises, and that we must learn from these mistakes, as all prior attempts at revolution failed from still being too conformist (which already in the 1930s appears to include the October Revolution). --79.242.222.168 (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Arctic Adventure

message: Can anyone expand on the plot summary to explain why Zeb wanted to kill the two main characters? Being mean doesn't really explain it. RCTodd (talk) 21:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot clarification
Category talk:Wii-only games

message: Due to the lack of concensus in the discussion here: , and several users feeling that all-inclusion would be preferable, and indeed in line with WP:SUBCAT ("When an article is put into a subcategory based on an attribute that is not the first thing most people would think of to categorise it, it should be left in the parent category as well"), I will begin including all games in this sub-category in the parent category too, and also add any relevant titles I notice along the way to this sub-cat also. If anyone has any reason for objecting, please note here or on my talk page. Thanks, Miremare 18:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: proposed merge with parent category 

message: "The House Of The Dead 2&3 Return" is in the H column where as "The House Of The Dead: Overkill" is in the T column. Somebody should fix that.Zabbethx (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm... 

message: Would someone who has access be willing to fix the way the hyperlinks are formatted? Obviously all the items in this category are Wii video games, so it seems silly to have "video game" (or something similar) listed after some of the links where there is more than one entry in wikipedia. Changes would be very easy to make following Wikilinks.
[ [a|b] ] gives b (link to a, labeled b)
(Skoot13 (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlinks
Talk:Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family

message: I think this article should be renamed to the original Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family. ArdClose (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. "Arthur Jermyn" is probably what most people will type in the search bar, because it's shorter, but it can be a redirect; we should use the correct title. Vultur (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: All other Lovecraft articles seem to have a link to the source, but nere it is missing.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Facts_Concerning_the_Late_Arthur_Jermyn_and_His_Family
Is there a reason for this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.163.244.190 (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Wikisource
Talk:As a Man Thinketh

message: This article quickly goes off on a tangent giving its author's opinion on a verse of the Bible.  I can't understand what this has to do with the book this article is about.  Are you trying to make the point that the author was wrong to use that title?  I think that is well beyond the scope of this article and, worse, no one cares about your opinion on it.
Then the article goes on to quote some song lyrics loosely based on the book.  Is this article about "As a Man Thinketh" or things people have written loosely about "As a Man Thinketh"?
Do you think we can get more content in this article about the book's content?
75.20.191.3 (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible Passage Tangent 

message: , do you think you could help establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest I think it is notable judging by how much I've heard of it, but it really doesn't show in the article as it currently is. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag

message: It says they're from the essay itself. Is that not a citation? Or do we just need someone to text search and make sure those quotes are all actually in it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.250.114 (talk) 12:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed?
Talk:Karen Kong

message: Article sounds too like a fan-based webpage and fan-based description. Many words rewritten to improve encyclopaedic tone and NPOV, Friendster listings inappropriate --Momolee 12:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gerald C. Meyers

message: The following text has been moved from being a hidden text within the article (See: revision as of 15:27, April 8, 2008 by Writegeist) 
:I can only find résumé-type citations for this, i.e. among qualifications and awards listed for Mr. Meyers on websites of academic institutions where he holds/held positions. These references all share exactly the same wording as in this article. They may originate from Mr. Meyers himself?  I have been unable to obtain corroboration from the French Embassy, the French national archives or the American Society of the French Legion of Honor. This alone is no reason to doubt the accuracy of the statement as it appears in the article. Nevertheless, any verifiable independent citation would be welcome.
Other contributors can now read this request and add the information. Thanks! — CZmarlin (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years is more than long enough. I've removed the cite tag. Writegeist (talk) 03:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: An independent reference is now provided. The original photograph of Mr. Meyers receiving the award that was published by a respected industry publication should be positive proof of authenticity. CZmarlin (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross of the French Legion of Honor 
Talk:Mirrool

message: Reference 4 refers to an article originally published in The Age. The link is no longer valid.Pauken (talk) 08:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks for making us aware. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

message: The sign on this page, File:MirroolSiloKickSign.JPG, states that the Silos won in 2004. The page indicates the winner was Rob Harper? Which is correct? Pauken (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Asimov's Guide to the Bible

message: 'His "Guides to the Old and New Testament" include both biblical verse, footnotes, references and subject indexes.' - the word both in that sentence is meaningless, but I'm not sure what the intended sense is (should it be "both include"?)  "Guides to the Old and New Testament" probably shouldn't be in quotes if it's not a title of an actual book. --Maltelauridsbrigge (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: minor grammatical points

message: Forgive me for this is my first try in editing anything, i wish to expand upon this page and well hereby seek permission to do so. I have the book  in hand and have read it ( although not completely ) Any opinions anyone? AhazAlas (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:Be bold :) -- Quiddity (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Adoption of this article

message: This article is very small for such a massive and interesting work by an in other fields so prolific author. I would very much personally like to know if this is any sort of accepted historical anthology or if it's been critized. It's content would certainly seem somewhat controversial... Anyone who would care help me expand on it? -- CarlJohanSveningsson (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: hear, hear ( Martin |  talk • contribs  18:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability/Critique?
Talk:Laurelia, Texas

message: It seems a little odd to be working on an article about a ghost town. Isn't the very definition of a ghost town a town that nobody cares about anymore. Note that futility doesn't stop my from adding my own few senteces though.123Mike456Winston789 (talk) 22:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You Marylanders will never understand us Texicans.  We have 500+ ghost towns [], which far outstrips other States, and proud of it.  But, of course, everything is bigger in Texas. -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Atlas Maior

message: Considering that Joan Blaeu's exceptional Atlas Maior was completed in 1665, it should be considered in the public domain.
Does that mean that we can freely scan and publish the maps published by Taschen? Or are the reproductions protected by copyright?
77.248.219.162 (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Taschen books aren't just reproductions, nor true facsimiles of the Atlas Maior; the texts are new, so there's definitely copyright on the books. Whether there's any copyright on the individual maps as published in the Taschen series, I can't say. You should contact the author (Peter van der Krogt), the publisher (Taschen Verlag) and the current owner of the original atlas (Austrian National Library in Vienna) for more information. Michael! (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright question

message: Although the "History" section isn't annotated, everything I wrote there can be easily verifiedPeter van der Krogt (2000) Koeman's Atlantes Neerlandici II: The Folio Atlases Published by Willem Jansz. Blaeu and Joan Blaeu, Houten: Hes & De Graaf publishers BV, . Michael! (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Geographica Blaviana and Cosmographia Blaviana should also redirect to this page, just like Atlas Blaeu. Michael! (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirections

message: Is "the largest and most expensive book published in the seventeenth century" or "the largest and most expansive book published in the seventeenth century" ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.115.213.38 (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello shittypedia 