lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coba

message: I see that the information I added about the cost of admission was deleted. Don't you think that information about the site as it is today is as relevant as the other information in the article? Cablemonkey 604 (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't revert your edit, but I can kind of understand the reasoning behind it. Most of the time you'll find info about specific prices and rates included in Wikitravel articles, but not in Wikipedia articles. Ken Thomas (talk) 23:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted info

message: We just got back from Coba and I believe the picture entitled "Coba Group pyramid" is actually near the Nohoch Mul Group.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.142.20 (talk • contribs) 17 November 2008
:Thanks, but I'd reckon the two images here labelled "Coba Group Pyramid" are both of the structure generally known as "La Iglesia", the main structure in Group B (or Coba Group). It's identifiable by the stela (Stela 11 I think) protected with a small thatch and positioned near a tree out the front, its greater state of disrepair compared with Nohoch Mul and the (hard to discern in the pics) nine levels or tiers.--cjllw ʘ TALK 06:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image identification

message: If the subject of the article is "a large ruined city," why do we need to include figures (in two different sections, no less) on the current population? If modern Cobá is significant enough to merit a Wikipedia article, shouldn't it be separate from the one about the ruins? 850 C (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of article 
Talk:Kohunlich

message: Removal of material
I revised the description to fit what I saw at the site last Friday.  I removed "South of the main plaza lies the sunken Plaza Mervin, on the west side of the site...." because it is two directions at once.132.238.22.115 (talk) 19:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Miguel de la Madrid

message: I agree with the 'untitled' comment below. There are other widely accepted points of view about Mexico's economic policies from WWII through the 1980s. Possible remedies: some description of the positive impacts of import substitution, a sentence about the "Mexican Miracle," some mention of the relative failure of export oriented industrialization, and maybe just a pinch of that gigantic list that composes the negative effects of neoliberal market reform on Mexican society.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.236.133 (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:Chalcatzingo

message: Have noticed a basic error in naming the bas-relief or petroglyphs, as Monuments, have corrected this on the spanish version, plus added some interesting descriptions found on the German article, plus photos. All has been added in spanish. My dilemma is if I should update the english version accordingly.--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dilemma
Talk:Silviu Brucan

message: What sources do you have? --Brasoveanul 12:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a known thing. For example it's mentioned in Theft of a Nation: Romania Since Communism by Tom Gallagher, page 287, in the chapter about Corneliu Vadim Tudor and PRM... bogdan 08:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish ancestry

message: The idea that FSN/PSDR/PSD is a leftist party is greatly exaggerated. According to Florin Poenaru, "the movement led by Ion Iliescu was from the very beginning the party of local capitalists and not of the industrial proletariat" (p. 36).  Andrei Pleșu once stated that main post-'89 Romanian political parties do not act on the basis of ideology/doctrine.  Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leftist party
Talk:San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán

message: Is this the same Tenochtitlan as the Aztecs? --AW 22:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, though this site is more commonly known as just San Lorenzo. -- Oaxaca dan 22:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, someone should make that clear then if we can find a source, it could be confusing --AW 23:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as Aztec? 
Talk:Xochicalco

message: How is the name pronounced? Can someone please add pronunciation guide? SpectrumDT 17:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone added the IPA pronounciation '[ʃot͡ʃiˈkaɬko]', which should render the above comment answered. I would however be interested in sources for this pronounciation. This is also relevant in the article Xochimilco, which originally also had the unsourced [ʃ] pronounciation for the first character, but the actual pronounciation among Mexicans seems to be [s]. If someone encounters a source for this, please, add it to both articles or message me with it. I would be most grateful, thanks. --Methossant (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 
Talk:Tzintzuntzan (Mesoamerican site)

message: The section on "Religion in the Land" is very awkward and I question why it's included at all. In particular, the sentence that reads "It's religions like these that have made a market of the land and its people to bring in more money to strengthen the churches in Tzintzuntzan" is very unclear. I suggest deleting the entire section, since it has nothing to do with the archaeological site. 850 C (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Religion in the Land" 
Category talk:WWE teams and stables

message: Where is it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.130.187 (talk) 09:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WERE"S PRICELESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

message: Were's Kane and Big Show  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwe.fana (talk • contribs) 20:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kane and the Big Show

message: Why is Finlay and Hornswoggle called User:Phoenix917/Sandbox?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwe.fana (talk • contribs) 20:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Phoenix917/Sandbox? 

message: I created an article for the new NXT Tag Team Champions The Lucha Dragons (Sin Cara and Kalisto). Any chance they can be added onto the list under "L"?
:Yes. Include this  Lucha --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lucha Dragons 

message: I remember that they were a tag team  Walkjord807 (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Heath Slater and Rhyno
Talk:San José Mogote

message: Curiously, two different anon ips on successive days added the bulk of the material here in block edits, unable to ascertain if the text has origins elsewhere or not. In any event, while there's some quite good material here the article has not been stitched together properly- made a start at reorganising and standardising the citations, but needs a fair amount of work.--cjllw | TALK 08:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:El Tajín

message: In December 2022 there appears to have been an attempt to destroy painted murals in Tajin Chico--a plastic covering was set on fire, with debris from the plastic falling on the murals. The scope of the damage isn't certain: early reports claimed the paintings were totally destroyed, but later INAH says the damage may be reversible.
I couldn't find any information on whether these murals have been photographed/digitized, although the article claims "The damaged mural had been intervened by archaeologists in 1984"
https://www.lavozdemichoacan.com.mx/cultura/perdida-total-queman-murales-de-zona-arqueologica-de-el-tajin-en-veracruz/
https://www.diariodexalapa.com.mx/local/incendio-en-el-tajin-afecto-pinturas-historia-y-dictamen-del-inah-9371746.html
https://www.infobae.com/america/mexico/2022/12/23/inah-descarto-danos-irreversibles-en-murales-de-el-tajin-tras-ser-quemados/
https://cambiodemichoacan.com.mx/2022/12/30/siniestro-en-el-tajin-es-reversible-senala-el-inah-para-restauradores-no/ Kaciiniʔ (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 fire/arson
Talk:Zaculeu

message: includes dozens of different languages. Which is it that spells the place Saqulew? -LlywelynII (talk) 22:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Maya

message: The etimology for both Mam and Q'anjob'al maya was not accurate. 
In Mam language, "Earth" is twitz tx'otx' and "Soil" is tx'otx'. In Q'anjob'al language is Yib'an q'inal and tx'otx'ej, respectively. I made such distinction, since in Mayan languages the words for Earth and soil aren't interchangeable, as opposed to Indoeuropean counterparts.
*Maya' Choltzij: Vocabulario comparativo, Oxlajuuj Keej Maya' Ajtz'iib', Cholsamaj, 2003 
Big-latigo (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've undone the change for now, since the information is cited. I'm sure there is more than one way of saying these things, but I will go back to my sources to check this... Simon Burchell (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology and location
Talk:Chandler Woodcock

message: Where are these results coming from?  The votes haven't been completely tallied yet it appears.  I can't find a source that says anything beyond 85-88% of the precincts reporting.  It shows Woodcock as leading, but not necessarily securing the bid yet.  
  
Metros232 12:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results 
Talk:Maaza

message: Where is the reference for the statistic that 90% of fruit juice market in India is mango dominated? --Clark.kent 12:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i wnat to import maaza mango to angola 102.214.36.17 (talk) 10:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  how can i import maaza to angola
Talk:Seibal

message: I added some approximate coordinates. These coordinates should be refined to give the exact location, preferably the center of the main temple (temple 1 if I remember right), at the site. grr (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 
Talk:Mixco Viejo

message: Instead of having a section heading for each group and describing where they are, draw a map in paint and post it.  This will be much clearer and will avoid having extra text where it is not needed.--RichardMills65 (talk) 16:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the process of writing up each group - the sections will be expanded in due course. Simon Burchell (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groups 
Talk:Kaminaljuyu

message: Need coordinates (preferably with altitude) grr (talk) 04:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: The article uses the language “distinctly unimpressive” to describe the site at least twice. Unless this is an archaeological term of art it seems like not exactly a NPOV. Looks impressive to me! 69.242.219.235 (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Distinctly unimpressive”
Talk:Joya de Cerén

message: White road found by accident report here, and here. EdwardLane (talk) 17:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Mayan Road 
Talk:John Bowker (theologian)

message: A references tag has been on this page since June 2006.  None of the material in the opening paragraph is cited, and per discussion in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Bowker, there is no listing for him in either NCSU or UPenn.  If you're in the process of updating the article, add citations for all the information in the first paragraph.  Removal of the unsourced information is long overdue. *Spark* 00:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn/Archive 2

message: We need articles on Florence Farr and Pamela Coleman Smith! Farr was a renowned actress in her day, the partner of Yeats on many projects, and Smith is of course the artist who created the most famous Tarot deck of all time. They certainly deserve their own articles. If only I had the time... - JMax555 22:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known Members 

message: Esoteric770: I'd like to know why you are removing, and rearranging links that are there for a reason. Please discuss before you make another revert. Zos 19:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted you again. All of the links to other factions of the golden dawn are there for a reason. Please provide evidence that they are not golden dawn factions. Thank you. Zos 19:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to the administration for semi-protecting this article. The "Sodalitas Rosae Crucis et Solis Alati" is a licensee of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Inc. and, according to their website, teaches the Golden Dawn curriculum as required by that license, so they belong in the list. This is just another edit-war being perpetrated by what seems to be a single person from a single contentious faction operating under multiple sock-puppets. This person seems determined to drive every article about the Golden Dawn on Wikipedia into an edit war, even when the other person sympathetic to his organization (Kephera975) managed to work out a concensus with other editors. - JMax555 21:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cant believe this. Frater FiatLux went to the admin and asked for protection of the article. He then removed the protected tag. I've left a message on the admin's page stating this. Zos 22:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like an accident to me (the removal of the tag, that is). Kephera975 01:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Orders
Talk:Hadji Girl video

message: I hope others can help expand this. It's not the best quality, but I feel I've done a decent job. I'm a bit too busy and a bit too worked up about this that I probably won't be able to do much more. Nil Einne 13:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I somehow missed the already created article so I've removed this one and redirected it Nil Einne 13:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Poland

message: Someone have to update this page from polish wiki => :pl:Wieżowce w Polsce --193.24.220.55 13:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As of 2015-02-11 this list uses height to roof, which is nonstandard. All other lists in the world use "architectural height" which includes spires that are an integral part of the building but excludes antennas and similar communications equipment. --Tweenk (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonstandard height measurement 
Talk:Quark (disambiguation)

message: Quark is also the geographic name of a thin stretch of water in the Gulf of Bothnia between two bodies of land- Finland and Sweden. This had been missing, so I've added it. Jcc (Jace1 (talk) 22:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like a good idea.  Any votes against? - Robert Rapplean 17:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: against.  I think such things only belong in the articles themselves, here in disam, it will just clog things up and make arguments.  One comes to disam to sort out where things are, knowing the etym in this case probably won't help any.  However, it IS a good idea to put it into articles where this is known.
IceDragon64 (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

message: And the main problem is that it does not lead to the most important meaning of quark: the particle!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.184.175.118 (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page has problems...
Talk:List of lycanthropic Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter characters

message: Silverthorn, thanks for your edits.  My inclination would be to put the "main characters" (probably just Richard and Micah) at the tops of their categories and alphabatize everyone else, but I'm curious what other people think.  TheronJ 13:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetical

message: I edited Vivian a little bit to try to get away from the "in universe" style of description.  (A lot of this is my fault - when I started the whole spin-out of the Anita Blake universe, I hadn't read the style guide for Wikipedia articles about fiction, but the guide is clear that we should try to write from an "Out of universe" perspective when it's not awkward.)  TheronJ 18:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry if that came off the wrong way, I thought your edit was great, and you've been doing great work in general - I just edited it so that we can say "In <novel>, <character> explains that interspecies relationships . . ." instead of just "interspecies relationships."  I'll try to look it up tonight.  All of your edits have been great, and that one is no exception. TheronJ 18:47, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for saying those kind words, I was curious how I was being perceived.  With the topic in question, I was just expanding from Richard saying three sentences about "cross-species" dating, in chapter 10 (page 95, hard cover) of Narcissus In Chains.  I'm not sure if "cross-species" is better or the same as "interspecies" or if I could even use Richard as a reference, would he not be "in universe"? Is using "Richard says..." somehow better than "Anita feels..."? Bekkie 19:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I see someone else used Gwen as a reference, so Richard then should work. It's hard though, because the world is only seen through Anita's eyes, but I'll try to be better at staying out of the universe. (A fun challenge since I've only been reading the series lately.) Bekkie 20:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vivian 

message: Maybe this should be moved to "List of lycanthrope characters in the Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter series"?  Man, that's long.  I was also going to suggest "List of lycanthropic characters in the Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter series", but that's one more character... -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List? 

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Ikuma Dan

message: I am disappointed to see that this article has been moved/Americanized from Dan Ikuma to Ikuma Dan. Can someone explain why this was done? - Kleinzach 13:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It hasn't been moved or Americanized. The opening sentence has been altered to be in accordance with the Manual of Style for Japanese articles (See WP:MOS-JA#Names) and with the article title. The standard Wikipedia format for modern Japanese names is given name + family name; the Kanji and transliteration show the Japanese order of family name + given name. Dan Ikuma also automatically redirects to this page, so both versions are covered. Seann 15:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well in that case, the style is an American one which I certainly deplore. I am surprised because WP does not usually support American usage against British. This must be an exception. (Are Chinese and Korean names also treated in this way?) Obviously I can't object to the naming of this particular page, and I take your point about the redirects, of course. Thanks for the information, I will see if I can lodge a protest! - Kleinzach 16:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a question of American versus British -- it's about what is considered standard usage for an encyclopedia. For what it's worth, the decisions about this sort of thing tend to go through a very, very exhaustive process of debate before becoming part of the Manual of Style -- just have a look (on the talk page) at the macron/non-macron debate (still ongoing), or Hepburn transliteration versus Wapuro, Kana spelling etc. etc. But you're more than welcome to contribute on the talk page. BTW, Chinese and Korean names have their own guidelines. Seann 16:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now left a note on WP:MOS-JA#Names. - Kleinzach 16:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps I am too late to ask, however what about his grandfather's article Dan Takuma, should that be changed into Takuma Dan? and is the article name of Ikuma's uncle fine? (Katsuma Dan) | Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming Dan Ikuma as Ikuma Dan
Talk:Stand-up roller coaster

message: This page states that the first stand-up roller coaster was the The Extremeroller (EXT) which opened in 1983, but the Kings Island page says that the King Cobra, which opened in 1984, was. Can we confirm these dates and update one or the other page? LabSpecimen 13:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The First stand-up roller coaster was Extremeroller, in 1983.  King Cobra opened one year later, according to Roller Coaster Database.  Evilgenius638 22:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Or just add another column onto the current table for year closed.   Also a manufacturer column would be nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.18.129.128 (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First stand-up roller coaster 

message: What does this mean? It appeared in the "Status" Bar. JIMfoamy1 (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Late reply here, but it means Standing But Not Operating. — GoneIn60 (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SBNO
Talk:Japheth the elder

message: This is not a separate issue, but a discussion of one aspect of Japheth's appearance in Genesis.Mangoe 13:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It also looks like original research. --Fang Aili  talk 14:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I suspect you're right. I'm going to request deletion.Mangoe 14:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge into Japheth
Talk:Leopold Koželuch

message: Agh. I just finished Leopold Koželuh, didn't look for this article in the last day or so (when was this article written? Well, mine's mostly a translation of m:de:Leopold Koželuh anyway.) Propose merge?) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Jan Antonín Koželuh the same person? :-) --mj41 10:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. They were related, and Leopold was born with the same name- which he changed. Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: "The composer Jan Antonín Koželuh was his cousin and for awhile his teacher." Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Sources seem to differ whether they were cousins, uncle/nephew, ...? I may have to look into this after all. Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: No they were brothers 1.42.166.9 (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jan Antonín Koželuh]] 

message: The detailed list of works is inappropriate and a little ridiculous to boot.--80.121.83.89 (talk) 10:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In case anybody is tempted to remove the detailed list, please don't -- if it's not in Wikipedia, where on earth would one find it?David Couch (talk) 18:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: One should find the list in the literature. If it has not been published in print, it shouldn't be put into this article anyway. Simple rules, simple logic.--Suessmayr~enwiki (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

text:  It currently has an air of original research. Where was this list sourced from? Karst (talk) 11:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work list