Talk:Mulyanka

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of December 26, 2006, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: no, writing is not as good as it can be. not wikipedia's best work by far.
:2. Factually accurate?: cited, but incredibly short.
:3. Broad in coverage?: not enough information about a river in a historic part of the world. not enough info on industry, history, no map, no discussion of cities or progress of development along its course, cultural life upon the river, wildlife, pollution, river's use in local agriculture, etc..
:4. Neutral point of view?: yes not a controversial topic to raise POV problems...unless controversial issues have been omitted.
:5. Article stability? seemingly so.
:6. Images?: tables seem too large given the text interpreting and extrapolating the data, needs a map before it should be re-nominated for GA.  Images are not arranged per guidelines on images per word count (too many image, not enough text), and other usage issues.  Placement within article is aesthetically unpleasant, crowded and unbalanced.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  Thanks for your work so far. 
For a river article that has been a GA and may soon be a Featured Article, see Paulins Kill, or a current FA, Larrys Creek and White Deer Hole Creek. --ExplorerCDT 06:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: In the section Research by young ecologists, there is a link in the text. This should probably be moved down to external links or made into a citation somehow. I do not know russian so I am leaving a note here. --Banana04131 18:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed external link to contest results to reference. Thank you for noticing this inconsistency. — D V S [?!], 19:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A suggestion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mulyanka River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928020001/http://ibiw.ru/win/conference/river.pdf to http://ibiw.ru/win/conference/river.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050204170003/http://kamensky.perm.ru/proj/rayon/3.htm to http://kamensky.perm.ru/proj/rayon/3.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070602114618/http://www.ejournalnet.com/Contents/Issue_3/1/1_2003.htm to http://www.ejournalnet.com/Contents/Issue_3/1/1_2003.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100112042305/http://www.permecology.ru/report2004/r11.htm to http://www.permecology.ru/report2004/r11.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310140417/http://www.pspu.ru/sci_ecolog_suverev.shtml to http://www.pspu.ru/sci_ecolog_suverev.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)