lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phthalocyanine

message: This article needs to be urgently rewritten - it is awful.
Donttellya (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Who made this article ?

message: REMOVED *Handbook of Porphyrin Science, link to a page to buy a book
Mark155.198.186.180 (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scrap area

message: I think the diagram and Smiles formula disagree.  To create the diagram shown, I need to use the following Smiles formula:
C1=CC=C8C(=C1)C9=NC3=C2C=CC=CC2=[C](=N3)N=C5C4=CC=CC=C4C(N5)N=C7C6=CC=CC=C6C(=N7)N=C8N9
However, I am uncertain if the diagram or Smiles formula are wrong in the original article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.72.125 (talk) 06:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES 
Talk:Carpinteria, California

message: I just removed a brief mention of the Carpas gang. I don't object to the gang being described in the article, but the description seemed pretty strongly subjective, and didn't refer to any sources. If the person who added it wants to bring it back, I'd like to see it include at least a link to some outside source. Thanks. -- John Callender 05:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no gang in Carpinteria anymore causing real crimes 2600:8802:531A:AC00:2487:FCDA:BAF6:660B (talk) 06:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carpas gang mention 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Some of the text removed has been specifically identified as problematic as far too close a paraphrase of the source at . Other text has been removed presumptively in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Category talk:Communication

message: Communications is a disambiguation page. Do we really want a disambiguation page to be in a category?AdamRetchless 16:57, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: :I agree. I removed it Frédérick Lacasse 22:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See Talk:Communication/Archive 1#Information. Brian Jason Drake 08:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Information, communication

message: Can anyone think of a succinct intro we could add to scope this category and distinguish it from :Category:Human communication and vice versa? -- Beland (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction with Category:Human communication
Talk:HVDC Kingsnorth

message: When was it shut-down? According http://www.ece.uidaho.edu/hvdcfacts/Projects/HVDCProjectsListingMay2008-existing.pdf it was in 1987.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.199.54 (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shut-down
Talk:Moontan

message: Why does this LP, except for the track Radar Love, sound so very much like early Alice Cooper? Is the title of track 5 a reference to Alice? I think they sound just like Vince Furnier.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.34.235 (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Influenced by Alice Cooper?

message: Can someone please explain why the track listing on one of the CD releases of this album is substantially different?  i.e. 
*1. Candy's Goin' Bad  
*2. Are You Receiving Me  
*3. Suzy Lunacy (Mental Rock)  
*4. Radar Love  
*5. Just Like Vince Taylor  
*6. Vanilla Queen  
Thegn 20:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, the US version was probably morphed into what it was thanks to a record company. I don't know about you but I never thought Radar Love was a great way to begin an album. Sure, it's an excellent song and made for an excellent single but it just isn't one of those songs you'd want to start off an album. Feel free to disagree with me but Candy's Going Bad sounds like it was meant to start the album off. Not only that but IMO, the song The Vanilla Queen makes for a much better ending than Are You Receiving Me. Another reason why I feel German edition is the version that wasn't messed with is because a shorter version of the song Big Tree, Blue Sea was already on self titled album. The record company probably just looked at the songs Suzy Lunacy (Mental Rock) and Just Like Vince Taylor, realized they were the weakest songs on the album, and decided they wanted Big Tree, Blue Sea to replace it. -W.A.C. (9/29/2008 2:23 PM PST)
My CD has the same track listing as above, maybe this is the order that should be on the page because it is the original listing. Jthm guitarist (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Different tracks on different CD releases of ''Moontan''

message: honestly, why is that paragraph there? It's totally irrelevant and not even cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.28.104 (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Black Sabbath info in intro 

message: Everybody knows it's "Well in simple English I'm" and "What's your name Honey?", but in between them there's a half-speed snippet of something that (speeded up to normal time) sounds a bit like "I'm so busy" (or is it "bluesy"? The word actually comes out sounding like "blizzy") that I can find no reference to anywhere on the net.
I've listened to that few seconds over and over and I can't find mention anywhere of what this comes from. I can't track it down. Anyone out there who can? --Matt Westwood 23:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monroe lyrics at end 

message: Why is it called Moontan?
In the lyrics?
Inspired by Tintarella di luna?
MBG02 (talk) 23:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title
Talk:Central Region, Singapore

message: See also Talk:Central Region.
Removed text:
1: Such a common name as Central Region must not be used for specific information. 
2: This article contains extremely little specific information. 
3: This article should be merged into Singapore geography and deleted.
This discussion belongs in the talk page, not the article. Andrewa 18:10, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Lapon (SSN-661)

message: * A history of Lapon is being requested in the main article from C. 1969 - C. 1992. May I suggest anyone interested in contributing to this or other U.S. submarine and naval articles, read the book 'Blind Man's Bluff: The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage'? I found it very enlightening. I would proceed to transcribe/attribute parts of it myself, but my Wikipedia editing skills are few to nonexistent.... Noble Korhedron 18:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Clement Mok

message: The text of this article is from .  It was added from an anonymous user with no indication of permissions.  I am making the assumption, based on the fact that the material is from Mok's website, that it was used with permission or was added by Mok himself or one of his employees.  If anyone can confirm that this text is not a copyvio, that would be helpful. Gsd97jks 18:28, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This edit  is copyvio from , added by a new editor, Newmodenetnews.  Even if permission was given to use the information, it's written by Mok or one of his employees as a bio for his presentation. --Ronz 16:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still on my time-table. --Peter Eisenburger 14:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More copyvio
Talk:KIF

message: i'll move this article from KIF to Knowledge Interchange Format, b/c KIF also refers to other stuff. --Flurios 21:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, i won't :) --Flurios
The two should be merged one way or another.  Tim 17:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  KIF -> Knowledge Interchange Format 

message: The article indicates "...It was intended as an interlingua, rather than a format for human authoring of knowledge...". However the term Interlingua is probably not correct here, since it refers to a specific constructed language, not a general concept. Perhaps the correct term is pivot language, but I'm not really familiar with this topic, so I'm not sure.
Also, this article ([[KIF]) should probably be merged with Knowledge Interchange Format. Both articles apparently refer to the same thing.
*Yes they do, please go ahead and merge :) highlunder 12:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error and Multiple pages
Talk:Adobe ImageReady

message: I'm a little unclear about the difference between ImageReady and Photoshop.  What tasks would one or the other be better for?  What capabilities does one have that the other doesn't? User:172.146.169.213
:I've rewritten and expanded the article a bit to answer this question. —Lowellian (reply) 05:24, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Photoshop has more features then Imageready, but imagreready has the ability to animate —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.202.168.66 (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Image generated by Adobe Photoshop Elements still writes its metadata as "Adobe ImageReady". Very likely it's a fork. 58.152.223.101 (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between ImageReady and Photoshop?

message: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=626&threadid=1226597
ImageReady's most popular features have been integrated into Photoshop CS3. As the two applications became more and more alike, there became less reason for them to be separate applications - in doing so there are many advantages to the user (and to remaining in one app.).
Bryan O'Neil Hughes
Adobe Systems —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.201.0.2 (talk) 22:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found that rather confusing too. --pred 18:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued 

message: This is merely a notification that I have changed the current release as it is now CS3 (I know, I have it).
webjockey 15:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Release
Category talk:Irish artists

message: Lets get rid of the seperate painter category and put all artists in the same category. Notjim 18:53, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I have done this, it makes it easier to organize while the irish artists articles are being expanded, we can recategorize later into primary media Notjim 01:18, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Priscilla Chan (singer)

message: Mark Zuckerberg's steady girlfriend is also named Priscilla Chan!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakFree (talk • contribs) 00:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Zuckerberg 

message: She look too old. 206.248.152.209 (talk) 09:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So she is Mark Zuckerberg's girlfriend? 

message: seriously? we are going to add content related to her being upset about the death of her cat? Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  awful content 

message: A review was requested by User:Will629 at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Requests. I have looked a the article and it seems to meet the criteria for the B-class; I'll update the assessment noticed accordingly. Interested editors may consider WP:GAN review next. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class
Talk:List of Quebec media

message: This article is poorly written because there is no description of the newspapers language. I am currently searching archival newspapers and google is NOT bilingual, the search is either in pure English or pure French. There are also no notes of when the newspaper started, which is critical when looking through archives. --Mark v1.0 (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: No language description, no year of creation and possible finish
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sprankton

message: Not sure what to do here.  The Sprankton page has been resurrected by an anon user, with more content but it is still basically nonsense.  I've added the subst:vfd tag to the page, but that just links here and we're not supposed to edit this page.  The instructions at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion#VfD_footer, don't account for this happening,  So now I don't know what to do. AlistairMcMillan 19:21, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Milice

message: As far as I know, the Milice was more of a paramilitary organization than a secret police. David.Monniaux 19:39, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: This page might be a candidate for semi-protection if it continues to be vandalized. It's come under heavy IP vandalism the last couple of days. CopaceticThought (talk) 07:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection 

message: Odd that the history section starts by saying that the resistance scored successes in murdering members of the Milice!  Neither balanced nor a logical starting point for a section on the history of the Milice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The start of this article in particular has been badly edited. I don't understand how to fix the issue of the picture covering the table at the start of the article - could someone else fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble Korhedron (talk • contribs) 13:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: The buttons should be in silver, otherwise the French rank system becomes upside down. The metal that is the same as the buttons is the higher than the other metal. In the chart its the other way around. The source shows the correct metal. Creuzbourg (talk) 12:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I was working out from the photo in the source which shows the buttons as gold. Are you saying the other source showing them as white/silver is more correct? Skjoldbro (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Littlehjon has silver. Creuzbourg (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank insignia
Talk:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

message: While the article paints this lovely picture of free speech rights today the Canadian conservative author Mark Steyn is having to defned himself against the Canadian Government over a book he wrote.  The book was a best seller, and excerpted in one of Canada's largest magazine.   Apparently neither popularity, truthfulness, or the importance of the political questions being discussed in the article and book provide any protection against the group-rights grievence process led by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. 
It would be nice to see both the controversy discussed in the article, and the lofty claims for the Charter being the equal of the US Bill of Rights "downsized" to reflect reality, rather than the preening.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.32.253.72 (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mark Steyn]] case

message: Today's story about the Thatcher Cabinet potentially having difficulty getting the Charter through the UK Parliament because of a lack of provincial support should be incorporated, but I don't have time right now to do it myself. -Rrius (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thatcher Cabinet discussions 

message: "Canada Act 1982"  and "Constitution Act, 1982" in need of merging into one article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Absolutely Certainly (talk • contribs) 23:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, why?  The Charter is a huge subject on its own, and is only part of the Constitution Act, 1982.  Singularity42 (talk) 23:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Canada Act 1982 is the British legislation, and the Constitution Act, 1982 is the Canadian legislation, so no. —Joeyconnick (talk) 23:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  They’re separate pieces of legislation and should have their own articles. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Canada Act 1982"  and "Constitution Act, 1982" in need of merging into one article. 
Talk:Timeline of Shakespeare criticism

message: I created this article today as a spin-off from Shakespeare's reputation, which is getting long. Please add to it, especially at both ends! It's fairly fat around the middle, but at this moment it only goes from 1668 to 1841. If possible, please also complement each addition with an e-text link.--Bishonen (talk) 19:52, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction by {{U|Bishonen}}

message: I think adding a couple of quotes from Harold Bloom would improve the article. Wouldn't you agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BombaMolotov (talk • contribs) 07:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harold Bloom 

message: I move to delete the Jean-Claude Carrière reference. Is he really going to stand in for the past decade of Shakespearean criticism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.225.242 (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean-Claude Carrière? 

message: for an article named CRITICISM, where exacly is the criticism? massive overhaul is needed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.225.101.102 (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, 109.225.101.102, there is no criticism. Maybe it should be renamed Timeline of views on Shakespeare.Fcbbminiestadi (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you may be misunderstanding the article's title: it refers to literary criticism, not "negative views of Shakespeare". --Xover (talk) 08:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the problem is that it's a collection of mostly positive quotes, without commentary or context. Pope, for instance, didn't just praise Shakespeare--he also rewrote many of Shakespeare's lines, because he didn't like them. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV, where is the criticism
Talk:Environmentalist wacko, Econazi and Ecoterrorist

message: Aside from the silly title (mixing singular and plural, if nothing else), this page is a borderline political rant. It doesn't have enough potential material to be an article, let alone in its current form. - DavidWBrooks 20:35, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I merged this into Eco-terrorism. Please make future comments @ Talk:Eco-terrorism. Sam Spade 17:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: merger
Talk:French International School

message: from VfD:
A school stub. From what I gathered from their webpage it's an international primary and secondary school with 1200 pupils. I don't think that it's notable enough but I have a bit of deletionism in me when it comes to schools. Jeltz 20:53, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)
*Delete, schools are notable, but this is a stub. Wiki's not a directory. Wyss 22:49, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Reggae genres

message: I think a mention of the fusion genre of Reggae and Hawaiian Folk music known as Jawaiian should be made in the article. Jawaiian Music is actually very popular in Hawaii - they even have a Jawaiian Music Festival on Oahu. Here's an article about it: http://hawaiireggaemusicproject.blogspot.com/2011/04/jawaiian-hawaiis-reggae-music.html --Saukkomies talk  16:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jawaiian Genre
Talk:Above & Beyond (band)

message: If anyone can please update the IDMA's section as Above & Beyond were nominated for four awards: Best Trance Track - Blue Sky Action feat. Alex Vargas, Best Trance DJ - Above & Beyond, Best Podcast or Radio Mixshow DJ - Group Therapy Radio, and Best Artist (Group) - Above & Beyond
I attempted to edit the table yesterday but failed in doing so, thank you! Arnold.kevin729 (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  IDMA Awards 

message: They have released a new album named "Flow State" AnkitMenon666 (talk) 03:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Album: Flow State
Talk:Communication protocol

message: I propose this article be renamed "Digital communication protocol" as there's nothing in it about analog communication protocols (human or other biological).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.119.15.14 (talk) 19:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume those topics fall under Communications. Is there another article that should be named Communication protocol? If not WP:COMMONNAME applies and article should not be moved. ~Kvng (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Digital 

message: — Assignment last updated by Samg2828 (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Media Culture
Talk:List of network protocols (OSI model)

message: There are many layers not in the OSI model. The most used protocol stack on earth does not conform to the OSI stack.
LTE and its many layers can actually carry the entire OSI stack on top of it. We should try not to me so "Internet Protocol-Centric"
The failed and obsolete "OSI" model could have its own page so this page could cover network protocols? imho Scottprovost (talk) 18:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  LAYERS 

message: IP_over_Avian_Carriers
Where does this fit in? Humourous or not, it is a data transfer protocol that has been implemented.(once)--Marhawkman (talk) 22:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it includes both the physical layer (birds and printed messages), so it could be added to :Category:Physical layer protocols, and the data link layer (with a trivial encapsulation, as there's no protocol type field - sorry, no IPX-over-carrier-pigeon), so it could also be added to :Category:Link protocols. Those categories are what the "more" links in the bottom two layers of the IP stack link to in the IP stack template. Guy Harris (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks. It's added now.--Marhawkman (talk) 12:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPoAC 

message: TCP/IP were the original Internet Protocols, independent of the rest of OSI. How come they are not mentioned as a set in their own right, but only as minor parts of something set of protocols?
Corrupt one (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCP/ IP 

message: This page says MIME is part of Layer 7. But on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model#Examples MIME is listed as being part of Layer 6. It seems to be part of Layer 6 to me. WikiMix (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIME 

message: Is XML itself its own layer, because Markup Languages (though Layer 7) but they can be use for traffic control. --75.154.186.241 (talk) 19:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: XML is not a protocol Teo8976 (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  XML 

message: Could someone please add SAP (Session Announcement Protocol) in the relevant layer. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.67.241 (talk) 15:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAP 

message: Aren't SIP and STUN Layer 5-Protocolls? --Fabiwanne (talk) 14:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SIP, STUN 7->5
Talk:Summer Sanders

message: A 1971 interview? lets find the real date of this interview, because as it states at he top of the page, she was not born until 1972!
Didn't she host some show on Nickelodeon in the 1990's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.33.127 (talk) 17:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While it maybe interesting to many of us, this is probably not the place to depict the details of her accidentally exposing her butt crack and underwear on a TV show. I will be deleting all mention of the incident soon if anyone objects or wants to discuss this.Racerx11 (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embarrassing moment