Talk:Crane family

message: I agree that NBC's website is frequently unreliable, but, unless we've got an actual screencap or something of LaToya's name being spelled sans-intercapitalization, NBC is the only thing that we really have to go on.  (I was also under the impression that NBC's closing credits were in all caps.) — Spanish lullaby (talk) 06:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LaToya

message: So, I just discovered Template:Infobox Family and before I add these to all of the Passions family pages I thought I'd check to make sure that it won't be judged unnecessary and reverted.  Thoughts?  — Spanish lullaby (talk) 07:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I'm not sure how useful that would be at least for the Crane family, although there's probably no reason not to use it. Perhaps it would be better with other soap families who do have family crests, etc. -- Dougie WII (talk) 10:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox family

message: Removed the link to the real Crane family site again. It has nothing to do with the article. And I don't forsee a reason why someone would think to search for the real Cranes personal website on wikipedia. Maybe Myspace would be better. User:ksofen666
Just out of curiousity, why does it bother anyone that this real family link is up there?  Relax.
I could understand if it was a link to a commercial/for profit page or somehow against policy, but believe it or not people do search for Crane family relatives and info at Crane family within Wikipedia.  Silly huh?
Bottom line is, if you don't like the link, don't follow it.  But seriously, deleting (again and again) a link that maybe helpful to someone on Wikipedia - settle down.
Esstmaeb 02:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the link to the real-life Crane family webpage does not belong in this article.  If the Passions Crane family were based in some way on that family, the link might be relevant, but the only connection the two families have is their surname.  If this real-life Crane family is so important that others might want to see their webpage, then they need their own, separate article. Charity 20:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

text: There's a good reason to not have the link there, Esstmaeb: see WP:EL, Links normally to be avoided number 11 and 13. It's not your wikipedia either. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 16:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Real-life Crane family link

message: * Support sounds like a good idea to me. -- Dougie WII (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Crane Industries

message: Usually when an article is proposed for deletion, isn't there a link to the discussion and a summary by the closing admin? As this page clearly was, in fact, deleted as a result of of the proposal, could somebody please dig up that discussion and link it in the usual way? Rnickel (talk) 20:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , there is no discussion and the page wasn't deleted. I proposed it for deletion via WP:PROD, which does not involve discussion. Before the seven days were up,  unilaterally redirected it. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it, thank you, I was not familiar with WP:PROD before and got it mixed up with WP:AFD. I appreciate the clarifying explanation. Rnickel (talk) 21:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion, then deleted, but where's the discussion?