Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/John254 2

message: User:John254
    run at Sat Jan 19 20:18:34 2008 GMT
Category talk:         5
Category:              41
Help:                  1
Image talk:            3
Image:                 60
Mainspace              10656
Portal:                24
Talk:                  880
Template talk:         24
Template:              2154
User talk:             9553
User:                  380
Wikipedia talk:        464
Wikipedia:             3900
avg edits per page     1.36
earliest               18:34, 20 May 2006
number of unique pages 20728
total                  28145
2006/5   224
2006/6   880
2006/7   1489
2006/8   1153
2006/9   2674
2006/10  1756
2006/11  1458
2006/12  1606
2007/1   1636
2007/2   1061
2007/3   1203
2007/4   1365
2007/5   1815
2007/6   432
2007/7   1004
2007/8   570
2007/9   736
2007/10  1294
2007/11  1170
2007/12  2143
2008/1   2476
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
                       Mainspace
31 Masturbation
17 Use of biotechnology in pharmaceutical manufacturing
16 Great Depression
16 Genetically modified food
15 Sex-positive
14 Angeles City
13 Pornography
13 Grover Norquist
13 Fraud
11 Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
10 Non-Euclidean geometry
9  Vince McMahon
9  David Pogue
9  Rainforest
8  Viacom
                   Talk:
20 Masturbation
10 Pornography/Archive 2
7  Vulva
5  Ejaculation
5  Snoop Dogg/Archive1
4  Scientific theories regarding acupuncture
4  Palms Elementary School
4  Human feces
4  Gay
4  Rachel Marsden
3  Turnover
3  Non-nude photography
3  Jeff Gerstmann
3  Grover Norquist
3  Emory Folmar
                 Category talk:
2 Articles with unsourced statements
2 Wikipedia Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
             Category:
2 1840 deaths
2 Articles with unsourced statements
                  Image:
2 X-33628.jpg
2 NHG Subscription.jpg
2 Fractional distillation lab apparatus.png
2 Ugavi.jpg
2 Kristen Alderson.jpg
    Portal:
7 Society/Intro
4 Biography
           Template:
18 Cent
15 Proposed
7  Unreferenced
6  Policyalteration
5  Ethics-stub
4  WikipediaVandalism
4  Notcensored2
4  TestTemplates
4  Vandalism information
4  Band-stub
3  Blp0-n
3  Sprotected
3  RuneScape
3  Notcensored
3  New England Patriots roster
    Template talk:
11 Proposed
5  WikipediaVandalism
2  Sprotected
2  RuneScape
                 User:
57 John254/monobook.js
25 John254
12 AmiDaniel/Wr
6  Clem23
6  GamePlayer623
5  John254/Revert/monobook.js
4  BrOnXbOmBr21/Destructoid
4  Colipon
4  Agius
4  Propol
3  User At Work/Pols under investigation
3  LegitimateAndEvenCompelling
3  Truth in Comedy
3  Rimmers
3  Habbit
       User talk:
311 John254
8   Centrx
8   Ultranet
7   203.131.181.122
7   John254/Archive 2
7   74.12.83.176
6   John254/Archive 1
6   82.27.201.221
5   87.228.165.252
5   210.15.254.36
5   68.14.16.252
5   Dmcdevit
5   Politician818
5   Jeffrey O. Gustafson
5   70.121.7.89
                                  Wikipedia:
1070 Administrator intervention against vandalism
162  Requests for page protection
120  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
65   Requests for arbitration
58   Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
43   Counter-Vandalism Unit
43   Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit
     (third nomination)
41   Vandalism
41   Administrators' noticeboard
36   Deletion review/Log/2008 January 7
32   Deletion review/Log/2007 December 30
27   Deletion review/Log/2008 January 12
27   Requests for arbitration/John Buscema/Workshop
25   Removing warnings poll
20   Requests for arbitration/IRC/Workshop
                  Wikipedia talk:
103 Semi-protecting policy pages
73  Vandalism
60  Counter-Vandalism Unit
49  Polling is not a substitute for discussion
28  Biographies of living persons
25  Centralized discussion/Removing warnings
14  Speedy deletion criterion for unsourced articles
10  What Wikipedia is not
9   Criteria for speedy deletion
7   Removing warnings
6   Canvassing
6   Semi-protection policy
6   Protecting children's privacy
4   WikiProject Health
4   Edit war
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 20:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for John254

message: #:I know this is going to be jolly bad form, and for that I apologise in advance, but as the issue I wish to raise is important and this RfA might well have closed before I would normally be able to raise the concerns, I feel I have no option but to raise the issues now. John, as a relatively uninvolved party, made several comments on a pending Request for Arbitration relating to the conduct of myself and another administrator, JoshuaZ over edits and page protection relating to Rachel Marsden. I would normally wait for such a case to either be accepted by the Committee or rejected before raising comment, but I feel the concerns I have are important and should be raised here. Firstly, and most importantly, these concerns were raised firstly (and only) with the Arbitration Committee, neither myself (nor Joshua, it would seem) has received any messages on our talk pages from John relating to his concerns. This single issue shows a complete lack of the necessary communication skills vital for this position. Secondly, the statements made by John to the committee are woefully inaccurate and portray events in a matter which is completely contrary to the actual history of the article. There are vast omissions of vitally important information relating to edits made to the article. I have no reason to believe this is in bad faith however but it is a significant worry and suggests that John may inadvertently be unfair and biased when dealing with any similar situations in future. Finally, I'm rather concerned by John's understanding of the BLP policy, his concerns relating to a protection I performed on the Marsden article and content contributed by Joshua would tend to suggest he would remove unflattering material even if such material is presented in a neutral, balanced, fair, and unbiased manner. There's always going to be a little bit of give and take with BLP, one person might think something is a little too negative and vice versa, so discussion to find a compromise is essential. Again, John has entered into no discussions with me over the content of the article other than a response to my comments on the Arbitration Case. Again, I find both his lack of understanding over the policy and complete lack of discussion prior to commenting before the Arbitration Committee to be undesirable traits in a potential administrator. Nick (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lengthy discussion mainly re [[WP:BLP]] moved from [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/John254 2]]