Talk:Hare coursing

message: The "procedure" only refers to "open coursing".Legal coursing does not award points for turns etc. the winner is the first one to turn the hare or if no hare is turned then it is decided on the first dog to reach the top of the field.Please get this part of the article right.Maybe use the definition of coursing in Ireland which is on the original article.It is more up to date and if worded properly shall make the article.HECTOR 21:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense. The blokes that mostly go out at night use lurchers and also do a bit of buglary while they are out. The majority of dog men actually do hunt, there just not the kind of people hunters want to admit make up the majority of there cadre.--Son of Paddy's Ego 22:30, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Good idea. WHy not add it? MikeHobday 21:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Most peopke to be honest if you ask them what's "coursing" or "hare coursing' wont have a clue what it is.Its a unique and exciting sport that goes back generations and generations(one of the worlds oldest sports) .However the article on this site is wrong as in coursing the dog(always a GREYHOUND never a lurcher,lurchers are only used for hunting by some people(i.e.Travellers/Itenerants or as they are known in the UK "Gypsies") wears a mussle and the aim is to turn the hare on a field approximately 200 yards, the hare then goes in to the escape(a field surrounded by high fences) where to be honest it (they) are free from harm as no dog or fox can get in and no hunter with a gun can shoot them,in the escape the hare is fed with apples,sally trees,oats and given water every day.So to be honest they are well kept and the people involved in this sport do not set out to kill the hares.After the coursing the hares are let off into the wild and won't be disturbed until the following year. Open coursing(very rare these days) is different where the dogs don't wear mussles and there isn't a set field(i.e. the hunt goes on until the hare escapes,this is probally what sets people off. The protesters should mind their own business and get their facts right (most dont even know what coursing is let alone know what a Greyhound looks like!!).As for the rubbish about "hunters burgaling at night time" you are only telling lies as the people involved in this sport are the ones that break their backs for their communities,are involved local sports,go to mass on saturdays/sundays etc.,some have land and go to the pubs(i.e just plain and simple normal people.), we dont use lurchers thats probally some race that i have already stated in line 5, some of them people also try to rob the hares that coursing clubs have caught, some of them kill the hares so why dont you all bother them instead of the innocent people.Some people shoot the hares but not us.WE DONT INTENTIONALLY TRY TO KILL THEM, very rarely do they die(DEFINITELY NOT ON PURPOSE),they are well fed and looked after.So if you want to ban a blood sport ban Boxing or something thats actually a blood sport(although you wouldnt have a chance).Theres more violence on tv nowadays than in real life and what about the out of control celebs??Or the Scum Drug dealers and terrorists than are ruining our society?They are the ones who are doing something "ILLEGAL" Annoy them cant ye?Coursing is an offical sport like it or not its perfectly legal.
:The problem with this country is bigoted scum like yourself. If you want a more constructive debate I suggest you stop hidding behind an IP address. The article has a reference to a pro hunt person who disagrees with you in virtually every detail.--84.9.211.79 19:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the Name Davy is an ID. This article is about coursing as it happens not just the people you consider real coursers.--84.9.192.10 19:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Then you should add your stuff under a sub topic like Mussled Coursing, the variety of modern coursing needs to be covered good and bad, legal and not. The nearest pub was the local  doggers pub, being conviently situated on the edge of the coutryside. I'd watch them slope of into the night. My own point of view is. If you eat what you kill and your method is not unduly cruel, then it's fine. I disagree with a lot of fisher men and fox hunters on the not eating point. I foxes are such a pest then a more efficent method than the hunt is needed.--84.9.210.127 20:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Too bad they didn't succeed...it's a sickening bloodsport.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.69.214 (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hare coursing is a sport 

message: [Why is this 'bastardized', it is under rules, National Coursing Club rules, only greyhounds participate, not lurchers. Dont see how this is relevant.]
*If the orignal purpose was meat for the pot, then by removing that as the purpose, it becomes illegitmate, hence bastardised?--IanDavies 16:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You wrote the last batch . Perhaps things are different in Limerick.--IanDavies 23:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I know history and I'm not dumb enough to beleive that just because me old da told me something it must be true. You clearly don't understand the history of hunting with dogs or what the word "coursing" means huting with dogs. Not you belief that it is only greyhound. You ignorance is sickening as is you arrogance. You don't even have the courage to identify yourself. --IanDavies 12:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

text: At the moment there is not enough information to justify spliting the article, so it will have to cope with both historic and current practice. The travelers you refer to and the dog men, I'm more familar with, see themselves as Hare courser. The article has to be more like the Football article.--IanDavies 22:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree with IanDavies - the various aspects of hare coursing can and in my opinion should be contained within a single article. Like it or not, the activity as practiced outside of official NCC rules is still hare coursing. The proper approach, I would suggest, would be to include it in the article, but point out the fact that it is an unofficial form of the same general activity. We can't just omit it because some of us don't like it or wish to distance ourselves from it in order to support the official form. That would be against the purpose of Wikipedia in general, as well as its NPOV policy specifically. --Hux 12:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move comment

message: I tried to clean up the grammar in the article and get it closer to a NPOV. One question though: the article says, "On average, 9 out of every 10 hares coursed escapes unharmed." Can anyone back this up with a citation? Without substantiation this claim could easily be read as an politicised attempt to limit the assertion that it is a "bloodsport."
Ya well done on cleaning it up,look coursing up in google and you get many useful articles on todays coursing.Ya 9/10 hares escape unharmed but from my experiences if you caught 80 only 3 might die and they often die by colliding with other hares in the escape.So even 9/10 is wrong its more so 9.9/10.DaveIan Davies Friend 14:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified claim? 

message: DON'T MERGE Hare coursing and "coursing" should be separate articles SirIsaacBrock 22:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MERGE

message: Cipergoth please take note that the information you provided is untrue and unfair.Im a courser and let me tell you 1/5 hares dying etc. is untrue.In clonmel this year there was no kills and in fact since the mussles were brought in hare kills have gone down enourmously.Its unfair the way the 15 or 20 so protesters get all the publicity just for turning up at the end of the coursing and roaring abuse for 10-15 minutes and the way they dont take into account the other 100 or son clean and excellent courses while they wait for the one where the hare is tossed etc.Dont mind the surveys anti bloodsports people carry out because they never ask more than 50 people,the majority of which dont know or care about coursing.Ever realise they never ask coursers?There are a plentyful supply of hares but it is threatened by a small brainless minority who trade and sell the hares to other clubs,people etc.Im totally against that and also the informal hare coursing which you have excellently pointed out in paragraph one.Well done but i find your figures wrong and untrue.To me coursing is not really a bloddsport compared to shooting and illegal badger baiting etc. which the majority of coursers would not be involved.
Again well done on the editing of the topic and try to coincide it with my and previous peoples edit.Ian Davies Friend 00:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues

message: I wonder if it is time to remove the reference to this page being a stub? MikeHobday 07:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A stub is a technical wikipedia phrase - see link at the bottom of the article. MikeHobday 08:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a stub?

message: The following was taken off the site www.indymedia.ie.
ALF Ireland attack hare coursing venue
The Association of Hunt Saboteurs last night received a telephone call from a spokesperson representing the Animal Liberation Front in Ireland. 
The Animal Liberation Front is a direct action animal rights group.
The spokesperson was informing us that an Animal Liberation Front unit has attacked the hare-coursing venue, Powerstown Park Racecourse, Clonmel Co.Tipperary on Saturday night - 8/01/05.
In a two-hour operation, ALF members spread nails and tacks on the hare-coursing field of the racecourse and at the entrance to the venue. A number of incendiary devices were also placed around the racecourse.
The ALF spokesperson said the further attacks were planned on this venue in the run up to the National Hare Coursing Finals to be held in late January early February 2005. 
The spokesperson said that war had been declared on animal abusers in Ireland.
I dont think that is right,that is terrorism,what about the dogs and hares that could have got hurt?Cruelty to animals is what that was end of story and also terrorismIan Davies Friend 17:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This would of course have been deplorable had it happened. However, according to http://www.scanna-msc.com/news_janfeb2005.htm#cells, the story was a hoax. MikeHobday 08:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attacks on coursing

message: Ian - could I suggest you do edits in "bulk" - doing 20 separate consecutive ones fills up the "history" page and makes it a little harder to follow the changes to the page? MikeHobday 08:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editting

message: I have removed the reference to 'Attacks and Threats on Coursing venues' from the main article because there is no evidence that an attack of the sort mentionned ever happened. I have kept in the link to a threat to Mr McManus. MikeHobday 07:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 rewrite

message: When the NPOV tag was added to the article, it was five lines long . Clearly, the article is a completely different one now. Perhaps the tag should be removed? MikeHobday 18:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag no longer?

message: Does anyone speak Czech?  MikeHobday 07:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: International coursing

message: Both images in this article were uploaded by the League Against Cruel Sports.  Is the flier really needed?  It seems like advertising. Klosterdev 04:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the peson who inserted the photo, I would prefer a different image of muzzled coursing, but I could find no free images except this one. Unfortunately, the coursing clubs themselves do not permit photography. If you can find a good free photo, please insert it! MikeHobday 08:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  League Against Cruel Sport 

message: :Image:NI coursing leaflet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NI coursing leaflet.jpg

message: Help sought at ,  and . MikeHobday (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coursing in other countries

message: I'm thinking of nominating this article for a Good Article candidacy review, so would particularly welcome any thoughts about potential improvements to the article - or indeed any improvements directly! Thanks. MikeHobday (talk) 10:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible good article nomination 

message: I am reviewing the article for GA and will let you have comments shortly. Brianboulton (talk) 22:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: I've put the article on hold, in the hope that we can resolve various issues within the next seven days. Aside from the matters raised here, there are some minor points - typos, MoS conventions etc, which I won't bother you with - I'll fix them myself. 
First, I think you have done well to produce a balanced article, with no obvious POV problems, on such a contentious topic.  A glance at the article's talk page indicates what you have been up against. However, I do have some fairly important issues to raise. They are listed here in article order, not in order of importance.
*Lead: As written, it does not cover the whole scope of the article, and is not adequate as an introduction to what you have written.
:Tried to cover this. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Hard to cite this, but have tried to show it is common. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Tried to do this. MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Not sure I completely agree. The issue is whether there is an "incentive" for a kill to take place despite that not being the overall intention of the activity. What do you think? MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Tried to do this. MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Tried to do this. MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: See what I have done, This includes removing Ireland completely. MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Any suggestions where, it does seem self-contained. MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I now have had a run-through to pick up stray punctuation, ndashes, nbsp requirements.etc., & await your response to the main points above. Brianboulton (talk) 18:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with you, but am not sure what the difference is. Could you advise? Thanks. MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done per . MikeHobday (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Clarified as colour of collar. MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Can't see where you have done that. MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: (Not sure because the Scotland and England/Wales "attempts" were successful, and the NI "attempt" did stop coursing. MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed it was inconsistent. Have amended to distinguish between Irish coursing (North and South) and specific references which are now to the Republic or to NI. MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Tried by moving to description section, with added info, what do you think? MikeHobday (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review comments

message: I trust we've got Ireland properly sorted now - if you're happy so am I. The reason you couldn't find the words I said I'd inserted was because I hadn't. I have now - but somehow the words in front of it look wrong: "but this rule was said to have been deleted shortly by early 2003" - doesn't seem right. Can you clarify? Brianboulton (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason to suppose that the claim that the rule had been deleted (between 2000 and 2003) was untrue, so have rewritten accordingly. Hope this works. MikeHobday (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It works if you get rid of shortly. Anyway, that's it now, I'll do the GA honours. Well done on what must have been a very long haul. Brianboulton (talk) 16:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!! MikeHobday (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Final GA comment

message: This article is a comprehensive account of the activity of hare coursing, and it achieves the difficult task of presenting a balanced picture. There are no obvious MoS violations. Various issues that were raised with the main editor during the review have been resolved satisfactory. I haven't been able to check all the on-line links and references - there are about 80 of them - but a sample check indicated everything in order. The images are good.
In short, the article passes all GA criteria. It is well-written and informative, fully referenced, covers the entire subject, is neutral, stable and well illustrated.
Brianboulton (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: I don't know if you would like to include this, but since it doesn't seem to be mentioned on the talk page I'll throw the idea out. Hare coursing is featured in a long sequence in Snatch, a film by Guy Ritchie. The scene uses hare coursing as a metaphor and may be fairly interesting to include. (The hare escapes.) --Gimme danger (talk) 22:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would tend not to include it, mainly because its was in the article, but its deletion was recommended in the good article review process. MikeHobday (talk) 07:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How does it "trivialise the article" and why does it need to be removed for the GA ? ☭   
мдснєтє тдлкЅТЦФФ 09:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the GA reviewer was thinking of this policy. MikeHobday (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: Thanks to Richard for his series of improvements. One query: "true form of hunting" seems a subjective term to me, and I wonder if it could be rephrased or explained. MikeHobday (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike, please see article re coursing versus hunting.--Richard Hawkins (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not trying to be unhelpful, but you're still using "true form of hunting", and I'm not sure what is meant by "appropriation." MikeHobday (talk) 21:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Hawkin's improvements to the article 

message: The article and certainly the comments seem influenced by some sort of ethical accusation, but can someone explain this in context?  Why is this occasional killing of a hare by a dog subject to so much criticism, when it is routine practice to keep cats that are free to roam and terrorize small creatures of the countryside, or for owners to feed live mice to snakes?  (My own feeling is to view "animal welfare" as an organized crime that prefers the weak and the wealthy victim, but someone should find better-sourced commentary...) Wnt (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theory of cruelty? 

message: I've simplified "UK and Europe" to "Europe" because, of course, the UK is in Europe. Maybe the intention was to emphasise the UK - if so, then perhaps "UK and elsewhere in Europe" might be more appropriate.--94.197.140.141 (talk) 06:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "UK and Europe"

message: On a similar note, can someone change the Eurasia reference? That's probably one of international geography's vaguest terms, especially since the article's already mentioned a few European countries. Brutannica (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eurasia

message: Perhaps we should leave the French for "hare coursing" to those whose mother tongue French is - but only those who truly understand French hunting terminology! 
Off the top of my head, apology for not using accents - chasse a courre is the pursuit by hounds = in classic English "hunting"(scent hounds). 
Chasse a tir is "shooting", (gun dogs of course). 
Chasse a vue is a classic for 'sight hunt' (usually sighthounds). 
Chasse a lievre is any hunt by any hound on any hare: it is not typically coursing.
In the 19th century the French called coursing le coursing - see Alfred de Sauveniere, 1899, "Les Courses de Levriers etc". 
However, in the last thirty years or so, the French call "lure coursing" Poursuite a vue sur leurre, which to me confirms the justification of calling hare coursing chasse a vue sur lievre - a sport which has been prohibited on open land in France since the 4th of May 1844 - the political triumph of chasse a tir --Richard Hawkins (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no doubt you're right. But what can we do except link to the article on the french wikipedia, even if badly named? Of course, someone could go into the french site and change it! MikeHobday (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chasse, chasse, and more chasse ... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hare coursing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407134928/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/sorghoundcoursing.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/sorghoundcoursing.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090308021458/http://www.irishcoursingclub.ie:80/fixtures.html to http://www.irishcoursingclub.ie/fixtures.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407134946/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/research/macdonald/macdonaldfinal.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/research/macdonald/macdonaldfinal.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hare coursing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407134917/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/deerhounds2.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/deerhounds2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081201081206/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/natwhippetcoursing.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/natwhippetcoursing.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407134911/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/deerhounds1.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/deerhounds1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407134901/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/coursingclub1.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/coursingclub1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407134933/http://www.defra.gov.uk:80/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/ufaw.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/ufaw.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081203004548/http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/committeedetails/aboutus.htm to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/committeedetails/aboutus.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Hare coursing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080615211712/http://www.sindhwildlife.com.pk/aboutus/ordinance.htm to http://www.sindhwildlife.com.pk/aboutus/ordinance.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225134646/http://www.fci.be/uploaded_files/285A2002_en.doc to http://www.fci.be/uploaded_files/285A2002_en.doc
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090407091253/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2002_April_29/ai_85178227/ to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2002_April_29/ai_85178227/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420175945/http://www.coursing.nl/alg_info.htm to http://www.coursing.nl/alg_info.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080726060434/http://history.sa.gov.au/chu/programs/history_conference/History%20Conf%2007/Coursing%20South%20Australia%20-%20Peter%20Donovan.pdf to http://www.history.sa.gov.au/chu/programs/history_conference/History%20Conf%2007/Coursing%20South%20Australia%20-%20Peter%20Donovan.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212171132/http://www.league.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=1716 to http://www.league.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=1716
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080129131615/http://www.ukbap.org.uk/ukplans.aspx?ID=410 to http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=410
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226201730/http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/pdfs/hunting/1_session_b.pdf to http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/pdfs/hunting/1_session_b.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090407004821/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040037_en_1.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040037_en_1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070111144208/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/sr/sr2006/20060114.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/sr/sr2006/20060114.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722100730/http://www.league.org.uk/news_detail.aspx?ID=467&q=republic&RegionID=&ResultList=1 to http://www.league.org.uk/news_detail.aspx?ID=467&q=republic&RegionID=&ResultList=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160110100225/http://www.suffolk.police.uk/newsandevents/newsstories/2015/february/vehicleseizedharecoursing.aspx to http://www.suffolk.police.uk/newsandevents/newsstories/2015/february/vehicleseizedharecoursing.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090407050628/http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_2101-2150/ab_2110_cfa_20060509_162901_asm_comm.html to http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_2101-2150/ab_2110_cfa_20060509_162901_asm_comm.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hare coursing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.league.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_318.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509133526/http://www.nwlacs.co.uk/archive/waterloo_cup_2005.htm to http://www.nwlacs.co.uk/archive/waterloo_cup_2005.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011111422/http://www.northernireland.gov.uk/news/news-doe/news-de-051007-protection-for-irish.htm to http://www.northernireland.gov.uk/news/news-doe/news-de-051007-protection-for-irish.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.ni-environment.gov.uk/other-index/news.htm?act=d&id=36912
*Added  tag to http://www.league.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_394.doc
*Added  tag to http://www.league.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_436.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hare coursing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111161508/http://heliosgreyhounds.com/coursing.html to http://www.heliosgreyhounds.com/coursing.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090407095335/http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=News&tBrand=edponline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED09%20Dec%202008%2018%3A59%3A59%3A007 to http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=News&tBrand=edponline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED09%20Dec%202008%2018%3A59%3A59%3A007
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Please leave this reference standing. It is the ultimate source. It has nothing to do with spam!--Richard Hawkins (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Reading "The Greyhound & the Hare 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :1st runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 22#1st runner-up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   talk 22:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1st runner-up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :1st runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#1st runner up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1st runner up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :First runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#First runner-up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First runner-up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :First runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#First runner up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First runner up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Second runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Second runner-up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Second runner-up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Second runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Second runner up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Second runner up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :2nd runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#2nd runner up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "2nd runner up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :2nd runner-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#2nd runner-up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "2nd runner-up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runner up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runner up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runner up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Second place in a competition. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Second place in a competition until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Second place in a competition" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Second prize. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Second prize until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Second prize" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runner's Up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runner's Up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runner's Up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runners Up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runners Up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runners Up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runners-Up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runners-Up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runners-Up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runner-Up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runner-Up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runner-Up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runners up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runners up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runners up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Runners-up. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 23#Runners-up until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 04:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runners-up" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]