lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of As the World Turns (1971–1975)

message: I was wracking my brain trying to remember why ATWT fans got so mad soon after Behr arrived as executive producer, because some of you had mentioned that there wasn't enough explanation as to why the show would be considered "bad" post-Marland. Well I finally remember. One of the big headaches was when she fired Allyson Rice Taylor and recast Connor with Susan Batten. I tried to explain that in the article. How do you think it looks? --JamesB3 04:33, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connor recast fiasco 

message: Please do not link individual years, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_formatting and WP:CONTEXT. The exception is if the year is from a different decade than the previous article, for example referencing something which happened in the previous or next decade. Then, the year should be piped to the appropriate article:
 1972
KillerChihuahua?!? 17:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Common linnet

message: Why does the article categorise the Linnet as a "species of reptile"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.88.217.55 (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reptile?

message: Removed the following cut&paste from very old materials at http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/1/3/3/11330/11330-h/11330-h.htm
;A linnet at sea
It has been often observed, that birds, in the course of their flight from one country to another, will frequently resort to the rigging of a ship, as a resting-place in their transit across the wide ocean. Mr. Gray, in his "Letters on Canada," gives the following instance:—Among the extraordinary things, he observes, one meets with at sea, it is not one of the least surprising to observe small land birds several hundred miles from land. I was sitting on deck, when, to my great surprise, my attention was arrested by the warbling of a bird. I looked up, and saw a linnet perched on the rigging, and whistling with as much ardour as if on a bush in a green meadow. It is not a little astonishing how these little birds should be able to continue on the wing so long as is necessary to fly several hundreds of miles, particularly when the usual shortness of their flight is considered. They continue sometimes with a vessel several days, and are frequently caught by the sailors; but it is remarked that they seldom live, though every care is taken to give them proper food. When the vessel rolls much, they find it difficult to retain their footing on the rigging, and you see them forced, as it were, to resume their flight in search of a better resting-place.
:Replaced it with a simple, "They are sometimes found several hundred miles at sea". Samw 04:03, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing

message: The term 'linnet' appears to be used in a wide variety of pre-1970 documents to refer to red finches in western North America, most commonly the house finch.  Do we want to mention this?  Smptq (talk) 23:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Archaic use of the name

message: The body of text refers to the Linnet as endangered, but the IUCN website classes it as 'Least Concern'. Should this section be removed then? 
--Owz182 (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: IUCN Confusion

message: I moved a reference in a poem by Burns from Conservation to Cultural References.  My finger twitched before I could post a comment. J S Ayer (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that why your a twitcher? Sorry. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *you're J S Ayer (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *owch. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncommented Edit
Category talk:Music by year

message: I just noticed that I was re-removing Category:Years in music from the year in music articles that have their own categories (eg, 1990 in music and :Category:1990 in music). I am doing this in accordance with Wikipedia:Categorization#General naming conventions, specifically:
:Articles should be placed in the most specific categories possible.
Since the X in music categories are direct subcategories of the Years in music category, putting the main X in music articles into those subcategories is IMO the best approach. I'll let this comment sit here for a while before I resume re-removing the overly general categories, to see what objections there might be. Bryan 04:17, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1) I'd like to rename this category "Music by year" (so that it looks nice in ).
2) I'd like to go ahead and do the decades, if no one objects.
--- CharlesGillingham (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two things
Talk:Keith Carradine

message: I think Keith Carradine should be a member of the most beautiful men of the 1970s club.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.44.83.207 (talk) 04:57, 26 December 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has anyone considered describing KC's involvement in writing the song for bornagainamerican.org?
Davedecot (talk) 10:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BornAgain credit

message: it seems as if he will be back in season 4 of dexter in some way, but can anyone confirm this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.244.181 (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dexter, season 4

message: In the wake of a major overhaul to David Carradine's bio. I thought I would take a peek at Keith page. It seems disorganized.  I think that a lot of things (like Nashville) could be expanded upon and some irrelevant stuff taken out however, I am about to leave for vacation and I may or may not get back to this.  I hope that what I have done has helped and not hurt the article.--Ishtar456 (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizing
Talk:Avella, Pennsylvania

message: The previous content of this article, while interesting, does not appear to be encylopedic. I ended up removing it all since I couldn't actually find any information about Avella in the article. I replaced it with some meager info (I had trouble finding more information on the web), and added the stub notice and such. — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 06:37, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of changes
Talk:Rito Revolto

message: Um, could we please have come context for this article? I haven't the faintest clue what this is about. --Edisk 05:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of New Zealand musicians

message: I really feel this "List of New Zealand musicians" is redundant.  The List-of page provides almost no additional information that couldn't be provided by correct categorization on :Category:New Zealand musical groups, :Category:New Zealand musicians, and :Category:New Zealand songwriters.  The redlinks (which is most of them!) could simply be moved to the Category pages' description to await creation.  Protest here..  Oliver Lineham 06:03, 2004 Dec 26 (UTC)
:Agreed Redundant PhatePunk 23:10, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the red links are gone, presumably they weren't referenced. What this list needs now is notes such as genre, years active and best known/highest charting song(s). Kappa 07:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy

message: Hey all. If you find this i have a backup on this page at User:PhatePunk/NZmus. I am going through the list to add correct catagorys. Any help appreciated PhatePunk 23:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Allison Durbin , Queen of Pop an artist who won awards isn't on the list nor is Mavis Rivers, a wonderful Jazz singer whom made it big in USA 27.252.82.231 (talk) 03:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Catagorising 

message: In case someone is inclined to "correct" these:
Libraries catalogue Che Fu under C - its a stage name. Dei Hamo is H, however. Also, the Maori name Te Whatever is listed under T. dramatic 10:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetization notes 

message: Article says "This is a list of music artists originating from New Zealand" but at least two of the bands (Crowded House and The Pleazers) originated in Australia, according to their articles. Should they be removed or should the introductory sentence be changed? Nurg (talk) 04:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some originated in Australia 

message: The two articles seem to be more-or-less duplicates. List of New Zealand musicians is the older article and its title is in line with those for many other countries - see :Category:Lists of musicians by nationality. Nurg (talk) 06:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of musical artists from New Zealand]] into this article 

message: This list is currently a shambles - acts alphabetised by first name, by surname, out of order within each letter. And given that the list simply duplicates what's in the category, is it really needed? Grutness...wha? 10:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  alphabetising 

message: Why is Rob Guest not on list? 211.26.91.87 (talk) 12:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rob Guest
Template talk:Anime-stub

message: Since the old image was removed to decrease load on the server, I'm wondering why it has now been replaced with a much bigger one? Shiroi Hane 02:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also wondering that. I nominate that it should be removed for that reason and also for the reason that it disrupts the formatting on some pages. - Squilibob 10:13, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, sorry about that.  I'd assumed the problem had been fixed (the previous one was removed almost a year ago), but Jamesday announced yesterday that this isn't the case, and that purely decorative images should be removed.  So no objections from me to taking it out.  (Incidentally, Jamesday also said that the size of the image doesn't really matter). —Kirill Lokshin 20:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a smaller image (2K instead of 80K), which will significantly reduce any server load. I think the stub looks nicer with the image than without. --日本穣 Nihonjoe 03:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I'd like to propose a new centralized format to change the current one used in this template, and was wondering what the other editors think:
	 This anime/manga-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia and WikiProject Anime and manga by [ expanding it].
Personally I'd prefer a more centralized, boxed format, so I've designed the above with that idea in mind, similar to the stub templates used in the JA Wikipedia (example). Please feel free to share your opinions. ~ Ganryuu  (talk) 11:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposition for new template format
Talk:Vice-Chancellor of Germany

message: There was no such position during Nazi period, after von Papen. Fantasy title, and logically not mentioned at Hermann Göring positions infobox. --213.172.123.242 (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vice-chancellor Göring ? 

message: Germany has no Vice Chancellor, just only a deputy of the Chancellor!
Why? A Vice- Chancellor is a permanent office and title but the German deputy of the chancellor acts only if the chancellor is absent; otherwise he or she is a normal Federal Minister only!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.189.255.72 (talk) 20:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong article
Talk:Eddie August Schneider

message: "This article is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. You can help by converting this article to prose". Only the timeline is a bulleted list, if it was in prose, it would be the article itself. Are timelines banned? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed the template to avoid confusion. Timelines are allowed for year, century, decade, etc articles; biographies are appropriately presented as prose. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What !Wikilaw are you citing ... chapter and verse please. Are you planning on tagging everyone of these: :Category:Personal_timelines --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:20, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at that category, all but one of the other articles listed is a standalone timeline/chronology rather than an actual biographical article. I've tagged the one other exception. Nikkimaria (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

text: *No one responded to your post at Wikipedia talk:Timeline, and at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#Timeline_section_of_a_biography the consensus was "in biographies editors prefer prose format over a timeline section" (and as another editor commented, "this sort of thing doesn't add any value to the Eddie Schneider article"). With regards to your other concern, the current documentation for  supports that they should be notable or particularly significant, which is not the case here; if/when this changes the issue can be revisited. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: * Again, the discussion at WT:BIO closed with consensus against your position. The discussion at Template talk:Infobox person has not yet closed, so it's premature to try to implement a change based on that; the current consensus, until that discussion is closed, is that reflected in the documentation at Template:Infobox person. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulleted timelines
Talk:V-Speeds

message: Until today there was two articles "V Speeds" and "V-Speeds" with similar content. A literature review finds both variants, and there is apparently no regulatory reference that would help us decide the proper punctuation. I believe the hyphen is illogical; there is no such thing as a "V-speed" but it does make sense for us to think of it as: "V" Speeds. David Brooks 08:12, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:National Medal of Science

message: The first paragraph states that the president awarded the medal for two years at the same ceremony. My understanding is that this is usually done annually. As it is written it is implied that the president did not award the medal in the previous year. Is that correct?
:I don't know if it was at the time of your comment, but it's referenced now and he did award the 2005 & 2006 medals in 2007. Why I don't know, and whether anything was awarded in 2006 I also don't know. Nil Einne (talk) 23:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: There are nine recipients of the medal in 2009 , but the official page only goes up to 2006. Do we add all those nine guys under the "Notable laureates" section? --Enric Naval (talk) 16:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 recipients? 

message: This is news to me. Kurt Godel (forgive the umlaut) was a mathematician of the purest kind: he was a logician working on the metamathematical foundations of mathematics. How can it be that he is a Nobel Laureate? He is listed under Nobel Laureates. There is no Nobel Prize category for mathematics and those mathematicians who have, received the price for the application their work in other fields (e.g. John Nash's game theory had application in economics). Is there a reliable source stating that Godel was a Nobel Laureate. Even the Godel page on wikipedia does not mention it if he was. Rlinfinity (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurt Godel Is a Nobel Laureate?!? 

message: I fixed one typo, which yields "pure and applied probability" (one link). A WP:redlink "pure" or "pure probability" makes no sense to me, and I see no good alternative except to link "applied" only. 
Compare "pure and applied mathematics", which is not linked at all, unless I missed it. Perhaps WP:Maths or Proby or Stats has discussed these terms regarding useful links. --P64 (talk) 15:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure and applied 

message: This article and the List of medalists both need to be clear about the meaning of the given "Year". A glance (needs confirmation) suggests to me that this medal has been consistent throughout its history, with an official Award Year (which is the year we list) and a factual presentation year that is one or two later.
This Award Year is an oddity, in my opinion, because it differs from the presentation without any truly annual meaning to the Medal. It's a lifetime recognition, essentially, and some of the medalists are deceased. If it's both official and consistent, however (needs confirmation), then we should use it; merely need to explain it clearly. 
As a note below this table I have nearly copied from the body of the article:
:"The first Medal was awarded February 18, 1963, for the year 1962 (see above)."
Perhaps that can be improved, but it is clear enough. --P64 (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award year
Talk:Standing Committee of the National People's Congress

message: The office of Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress is already the subject of another article; suggest removing the single sentence on this subject and putting the link to the existing article under "see also."  Also suggest removing the "previous members" section, which seems to serve no purpose anymore. Actually, even the list of "leading members" for the 12th NPC is questionable.  Just because you are a "vice chair" doesn't mean you actually do anything. Listing political nonentities like Yan Junqi, and omitting people like Li Fei 李飞, who is now chair of the SC's two commissions on Basic Laws of Hong Kong and Macau, and vice secretary of the SC, seems odd. Rgr09 (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standing committee chair 

message: In 2013, 2013 National People's Congress announced a new executive agency named "National Health and Family Planning Commission" created from the former Ministry of Health and National Population and Family Planning Commission. Li Bin is the first commissioners. So there's no longer "Ministry of Health" and Chen Zhu is no longer the Minister of Health. --User:BenjaminPML(Talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 01:26, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer "Minister of Health" 

message: It's not really made clear the role of the Secretary-General of the Standing Committee.  It sounds like a party position, but it also appears to be a state position?  I'm not sure I understand, and the position is not explained in any real detail on any page dealing with the National People's Congress.  Can someone clarify this? --Criticalthinker (talk) 07:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, not sure who is editing this, but every thing in the history section and more is about the Standing Committees recent relationship with Hong Kong. This information is more relevant and appropriate for Hong Kong-related pages, obviously. This is a page about the composition, function, and powers of the committee, not some kind of months/annual rundown of the happenings of the committees relationship with any one jurisdiction. --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chairman and Secretary-General
Talk:Lattice C

message: Who can send me Lattice C 3.10 compiler?
I think I still have the floppies for 3.10 Amiga version.  (Also have Aztec C.)
I also have Lattice C 2.12 for MSDOS.  The disks may not be readable anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.41.222.1 (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Compiler
Talk:Seven Sisters (Forgotten Realms)

message: We need a disambiguation here. The Seven Sisters is the name of an important book by Anthony Sampson discussing the international petroleum market, with the OPEC nations on one side of the bargaining table and "the sisters," seven interlocked Western corporations, on the other. It'll be a little disconcerting if someone, seeking more information on that book, ends up here.  --Christofurio 14:15, Dec 26, 2004 (UTC)
:I see your point - but it seems a bit ridiculous to have a disambiguation here as well as as Seven Sisters. Couldn't links to the Anthony Sampson book simply be changed to The Seven Sisters (book) via the "what links here" tool? -Erolos 20:25, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: As asked for, I have tried to flesh-out and improve the introduction to this article.  I'm not fully conversant with how to include footnotes and citations yet, so I haven't included any.  Hopefully someone will add them where needed.  I hope this edit is acceptable. RyokoMocha (talk) 21:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured it worked better as its own section, detailing their appearances from an out-of-game perspective; see Forgotten Realms#History for ideas on how to format such an idea. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 03:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Quinquagesima

message: The text said that Quinq. was 50 days before Good Friday - this is just plain wrong there are 47.  Saltmarsh 14:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction -Mar-2006 

message: Isn't Quinquagesima always the same as Last Epiphany in the Anglican calculations? --Aquatiki (talk) 23:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Epiphany
Talk:Pygmy mouse lemur

message: That distinction belongs to Madame Berthe's Mouse Lemur at 30.6 grams, whereas the Pygmy Mouse Lemur is 45.2–49 grams as stated here in the morphology section. The confusion is probably because when M. myoxinus was rediscovered in 1993 and making it's way to Guinness World Records, there were only two other species of Mouse Lemure recognized (M. murinus and M. rufus) at the time, and M. berthae was thought conspecific with M. myoxinus. Since then several more species have been recognized, and despite its name, the Pygmy Mouse Lemur is no longer the smallest. --Anshelm '77 (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been fixed. –Visionholder (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the smallest primate
Template talk:Latin alphabet sidebar

message: I changed it to look like my periodic table of letters.71.217.81.5 (talk) 01:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the original vowel-aligned version, and approve of your periodic table of the basic modern Latin alphabet. I like how the some of the columns line up, such as ve​lar and uvu​lar plosives in column 2 (except row 6). Thanks.Erudecorp ? * 17:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Periodic table of letters 

message: Doesn't display correctly on ISO basic Latin alphabet page itself... AnonMoos (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: problem
Talk:Gaius Julius Civilis

message: Was his name Gaius Julius Civilis or Tiberius Claudius Civilis?Kuralyov 19:58, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: His name probably was Claudius Civilis. Julius was misinterpreted (?) by some medieval scholar. Krastain 10:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current image (Nov 11, 2007) has Civilis looking left and is therefore a mirror image.  He's looking rightward in Rembrandt's original.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.225.187 (talk) 23:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirror image
Talk:Shoal bass

message: I'm not sure I understand the reason for removing the wikification of units of measure; all the Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes articles I've done use this (or should).  If there is a problem with it, let's discuss it on the project talk page so that articles may remain consistent. —Tkinias 20:08, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is "Shoal bass are now a species of special concern." a staatus?  because it isn't one of the options for the status field in the taxobox. Do we have a reference? RJFJR (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: status