lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bristol Pegasus

message: I removed £oœ as the name of the PZL P.23.  It doesn't look like it's rendering right, at least in an US-English browser.  I suspect that someone was using a different character set when they entered that; someone should re-encode it in Unicode and put it right.
(it renders as 'pound-sign o oe-ligature' on my browser, which doesn't look like correct). —Morven 22:55, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal

message: PeterGrecian 14:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Peter, I just used the top one for the infobox (2 1/2 years later!) . Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 17:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  new image 

message: While researching for an aircraft article Short Scylla I came across several different thrust values given for the Pegasus XC e.g.
: 920 hp / 686 kW
: 919 hp
: 910 hp / 680 kW
: 900 hp
: 660 hp / 492 kW
In the end I chose the last value because it came from the Imperial Airways site and I decided that the operator would know!
What look like a competent source ( www.oldengine.org) gives 
:HP(max)=790 hp and 
:HP(take off)=910 hp.
Can anyone help sort this one out? Many thanks! TraceyR 18:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added a new reference to the specs section and altered the figures to match, should be straight now. Lumsden gives the following hp ratings for the Pegasus X: 960 for takeoff, 810/850 continuous climb, 875/915 max power (5 minutes)  Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pegasus XC thrust?
Talk:List of Pittsburgh neighborhoods

message: What's the yellow bit north of Carrick? Nathanian 22:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's Mount Oliver the borough, not to be confused with the neighborhood - Tomdobb 16:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gap ????

message: i attempted a quick clean-up.  if we could de-merge the merged articles and get every official neighborhood a page, that would be great.  and to satisfy everyone who wants un-official neighborhoods on here, we could list them with the real neighborhood like is already done for a few on here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.54.17 (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean-up 

message: Uh…it's repeatedly claimed (here and in the main Pittsburgh article) that 90 neighborhoods are recognized, but then there are 91 neighborhoods listed. Just thought I'd point that out. —Notyourbroom (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  90 or 91? 

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Catskul (talk • contribs) 00:03, 18 April 2010
:I agree that this is an improvement. —Notyourbroom (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Though one thing I don't understand is why on the info pages (1, 2), the fonts look very different, whereas in the 1000px renders (1, 2) they look the same. —Notyourbroom (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Damn, that's a sexy image map. TheOneSean [ U | T | C ]  20:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  propose new image version 

message: The article (especially the table) was tidied up by me. Also added was the section titles Areas; this is a list of the places in pittsburgh which are often referred to as "neighborhoods" by the people who live there; for lack of a better name it is called this, it could use a better title and also addition of a description explaining the list contents. I hope my edits are acceptable. :-) --Hhm8 (talk) 09:34, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidied up the article a bit 

message: Since this is a list of neighborhoods, shouldn't Bluff be called Uptown, and Brunot Island be considered part of Marshall-Shadeland? --Scuzzy Beta 18:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map inaccuracies
Talk:U.S. Army officer rank insignia

message: Why was this merged into the U.S. Army article when U.S._Army_enlisted_rank_insignia was not?  I think this page was valuable as a quick reference and a nice printable list of officer ranks.  Perhaps it can be linked somehow to the chart in the main army article or otherwise reverted?  Thanks. - 64.247.236.234 23:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I've always had an issue with adding abbreviations, even before putting content on wikipedia.  I've never found an official source for any abbreviations for any branch.  Adding them is dooming you to endless edit revisions as personal opinions creep in.  I used to host my own military rank pages and got endless "corrections" all contradicting each other. - Wguynes 07:52, May 15, 2004 (UTC)
: Hi, Wguynes.  Below are official sources (i.e., the Department of Defense).  These use the military's standard, which may deviate from civilian style guides.  Also note that different branches have different abbreviations and that capitalization counts.
: * http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/insignias/officers.html
: * http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/insignias/enlisted.html
----
does the rank of General of the Armies, belong here as well? Xtra 02:53, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviations
Talk:Cornus (disambiguation)

message: Have tried to reconcile most of the differences between this page and Dogwood, but some still to do. The two pages should really be merged, as they effectively include the same content. - MPF 00:49, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done at last . . . only a year later! - MPF 23:39, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dogwood
Talk:Wicket-keeper

message: Why isn't the amount of runs cxvbcvbcvb each wicket keeper displayed as these days wicket keepers are selected on the grounds of keeping and batting
Why was a hyphen inserted into Wicketkeeper? Goalkeeper indicates wiki style to not use the hyphen. Moved a page a few days ago and got bollocked because the edit history was reputedly lost.. Now this page has been edited again, how do I move it back to the Wicketkeeper page? Moriori 01:21, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC)
The hyphen is correct - take a look at the Lord's page http://www.lords.org/cricket/lw_0000000066.asp
Bob Palin 03:05, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Considering that this is a high importance topic under the WP:CRIC banner, the article is in a very poor state and is particularly afflicted by "recentism".  Have flagged it for attention in the assessment template above.  ---BlackJack | talk page 08:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: Self evidently wicketkeepers initially squat as shown by the image before standing up as the ball is bowled.--Penbat (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self evidently wicketkeepers initially squat
Talk:Planescape: Torment

message: While digging through the online print archive, I located the following print preview material for this game:
*Computer Games Magazine Feature
*Computer Games Magazine News Story
*Computer Games Magazine Feature 2
*Computer Games Magazine Preview
*PC Gamer UK Preview
One or more print reviews for this game may also be found in the archive. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 15:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow great, thanks! :) 108.69.80.49 (talk) 16:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Jimmy, thank you very much for this, and your continued work on RPG-related games. :) I added a little bit to the article from each of the archive links you posted above (not from the online print archive though), even the ones you posted (gulp) 7 years ago... better late than never. :) BOZ (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey BOZ! Thank you for adding it to the article. I've got plans to expand the reception sections for several more RPG pages in the near future—there's a lot of material out there, luckily. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sweeeet. :) BOZ (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 

message: Says "Nameless One, is an immortal man who forgets everything if killed."  I would recommend changing it to something more like: "occasionally forgets everything when temporarily killed."  Clearly there are long stretches in the Nameless Ones history -- including the portion of his life covered by the game sequence itself -- where his memory is contiguous across multiple deaths.  It is only the occasional temporary death that seems to result in amnesia and thus usually the start of a whole new chapter of his life, such as the start of the game itself.  Additionally it is worth pointing out that these are temporary deaths.  As the game reveals his immortality can be absolved after which he can die completely and permanently; the deaths being referenced are just the temporary ones that punctuate his current state and occasionally result in amnesia.162.220.42.222 (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Intro
Talk:John Hinckley Jr.

message: I think calling Hinckley an "American singer-songwriter" in the lead sentence should be avoided, in favor of simply calling him an "American man". Two reasons: (1) it is anachronistic to the assassination, and can be interpreted to mean he was a musician at the time (he wasn't, let alone a famous one), and (2) it is undue weight (comparable to listing "artist" in the first sentence of George W. Bush's article alongside politician and businessman; it is true [see George W. Bush#Art], but not an aspect important enough to include in the lead sentence). — Goszei (talk)  02:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "American singer-songwriter" in the lead sentence 

message: Hello all,
There is no source cited at the end of paragraph 1 under the Treatment heading. The paragraph makes some very serious allegations that should not be published without credible sourcing. I have added a request for a reference at the end of the paragraph, however a review by a more experienced Wikipedia editor would be greatly appreciated. Dinopt (talk) 20:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment 

message: I am strongly opposed to the use of a photo of Jody Foster in this article. She is a living person whose name has been abused extremely severely by this man who never met her. It's obvious to me that her face does not belong here. I will remove the image again, unless someone can come up with a good reason to offend Foster with her photo in this article. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It is very messed up that that picture is on this article. I tried removing it also, and user FMSky keeps putting it back. Shevvvv (talk) 04:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

text: ?? what exactly is even the problem? why is it inappropriate to have this photo here? --FMSky (talk) 04:09, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is that it is distasteful and somewhat creepy to include a picture of the person a stalker is obsessed with on their article. Especially a "cute" photo like that one. It is as if the article is attempting to justify why the stalker might have stalked them. Shevvvv (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about dispute resolution on Wikipedia but I thought I would try it out since we keep disagreeing, so I posted it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#John_Hinckley%20Jr Shevvvv (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo of Foster

message: John Hinckley graduated from Highland Park High School in Dallas in 1973, not 1974.  I corrected it.   His high school activities included Spanish Club (2), Students in Gov. (3), and Rodeo Club (4).  Source is from his senior yearbook, Highlander, and reproduced on the Classmates.com website.--SN 29 July 2023  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.13.145.108 (talk) 04:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of HS Graduation
Talk:Jay Chou

message: — Assignment last updated by SheilaSh11 (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: — Assignment last updated by JasperL0 (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ESL Workshop
Talk:United States House of Representatives

message: Change the number of total representatives present in the house to 435, and number of democrats to 213 please (Suozzi was inaugurated today). Tyrant15 (talk) 00:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the number of democrats to 213 and reduced vacancies to 3. I'm not sure where you're seeing fewer than 435 representatives. Jamedeus (talk) 01:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 February 2024 

message: The change needed is the number of vacant House Seats which should be three instead of four. The bubbles showing the house vacant seats is correct with three and the number of Republican seats is 219 and not 218. 219 + 213 + 3 = 435. 2600:1014:B138:E9D1:0:E:5A5:9401 (talk) 10:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Ken Buck has made his resignation effective today (22 March). Personally, I'd rather wait for a source to confirm the resignation, but given that a sudden change is unlikely, I think it's unnecessary to revert over this. Presumably someone will also move the mention of him at List of current members of the United States House of Representatives#Vacancies out of the comment later today. Liu1126 (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: He doesn't actually leave until April. Bjoh249 (talk) 21:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2024 

message: House numbers need to be updated to Republican:217, Democratic:212, Vacant:6. I've tried, but couldn't do it. GoodDay (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The current tally is set correctly, per House member data. Accoroding to the official House casualty list, Mike Gallagher is set to resign only on April 26th. JohnNatalis (talk) 23:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates required 

message: Presuming that Mike Gallagher's resignation has taken effect is footnote [A] still needed? (Sorry if this is a silly question) Hamadi31 (talk) 23:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed seems like someone removed it. Hamadi31 (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about footnote 

message: Fill in one of the vacancies dots with red because a new republican got sworn in yesterday 73.22.56.65 (talk) 17:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 21:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2024
Talk:Battle of Five Forks

message: The Battle of Five Forks is a decisive victory for the Union as, said in the introduction paragraphs in the beginning of the article: " Pickett's loss at Five Forks triggered Lee's decision to abandon his entrenchments around Petersburg and begin the retreat that led to his surrender at Appomattox Court House on April 9."--Red Wiki 14:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We are using the result cited by the NPS. Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Forks a Decisive Victory 

message: A map might be useful. Valetude (talk) 03:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map? 

message: The article refers to Sheridan's command as a "task force," which is the proper term by current standards.  However, I don't think that the term was in use at the time.  If not, wouldn't it be better simply to call it V Corp, as that appears to be what it was.  JDZeff (talk) 20:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Task force? 

message: The old lede was longer and more detailed than any lede ought to be. It may have been roughly in proportion to the length of the article, but I feel that the article itself was far too long, bringing in many events before and after, which were not strictly on-topic. Valetude (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New shortened lede 16/8/18 

message: The redirect Petersburg and Five Forks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mdewman6 (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Petersburg and Five Forks]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hugh Williamson

message: This Biography does not have the date or year of death for Williamson.
Wikipedian64 23:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Enough Info

message: Is this a photo of Williamson's real grave?  Find-A-Grave lists him as being in the Althorp family vault, and has a photo of the vault.  Would Williamson have a separate headstone?  The only name I can make out in this photo is "Andrew" (possibly "Andrews" - a last name?)  Even Trinity Church's website has him in the Althorp vault.  Elsquared (talk) 06:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I work for a company that places GPS locations on headstones and have done extensive research in Trinity Church.  You are correct. This IS NOT the correct photo for the grave of Hugh Williamson.  I look at headstones in my line of work frequently.  This stone says: Here lyes the body of ____ Daniel Son of ______Andrew.  It would only make sense that Hugh Williamson is buried in the vault of his father-in-law. Annajyoung (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This grave has the Gautier name on it.  According to Trinity records there is an Andrew Gautier buried in this cemetery. Annajyoung (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct photo of grave? 

message: It seems notable since Williamson is otherwise today a fairly obscure figure for the layperson and the street is prominent in Madison and has a number of festivals and businesses which are named for it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.220.5.228 (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of Madison, WI's main streets is named for him--should this be mentioned? 

message: This page should be edited to be simpler and easier to read. Phrases like "His erudition" and "His experiences in that preeminent event of his generation transformed the genial scholar into an adroit politician and a determined leader in the campaign for effective national government." are far too lofty. Additionally, the page should be written from a more neutral perspective (seems like a lot of the article is dedicated to flattering the guy). Similar language issues are present throughout the article. Haydenb247 (talk) 15:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  language is too advanced?
Talk:William Samuel Johnson

message: The inclusion of the term "equity" in the Constitution's phrase "law and equity" does not, I think, mean "that the inflexibility of the law had to be tempered by fairness."  (The assertion that it does is copied verbatim from the "Soldier-Statesmen" article listed in the references to this article.)
"Equity" was, I'm pretty sure, being used in the Constitution as a technical legal term, not in its colloquial sense of "fairness."  Courts of Equity were a separate system from Courts of Law in English and American practice at the time; the two types of courts heard different types of cases.  
I have not changed the text but I'm pretty sure it's incorrect as it stands. Bruce Tindall 20:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Equity as well as law"
Talk:Bunny Berigan

message: I have found numerous websites that list his birthplace to be Hilbert, Wisconsin. There are also numerous to to list Fox Lake, Wisconsin as his birthplace. All agree that his hometown was Fox Lake. I wonder if writers took his hometown as his birthplace. Hilbert had a jazz festival to honor Berigan earlier this month. I would not protest if someone edited the article to list both as his potential birthplace. --Royalbroil 22:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: http://www.bunnyberiganmrtrumpet.com/
Mikezeee (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks to me like a retail sales site promoting a new book about Berigan. It does not look like an encyclopedic bit of information that helps to augment the article with otherwise non-free media or too-detailed information. Binksternet (talk) 23:49, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Not done: I second that. Rejected per the guideline on external links. Rivertorch (talk) 08:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 27 September 2012
Talk:Elena Filatova

message: Please do not delete this page, unless a link is provided to the redirect destination. Reason: Elena's name is synonymous to many people with post-disaster Chernobyl because of her explorations of the area around Chernobyl by bike, ref - http://www.kiddofspeed.com/ which I have linked to via one of my domains since Kid Of Speed was published. Myself and others are interested in and follow her work.
(Elena Filatova: Good to see this activity, I hope you are well -Saparonia)Saparonia (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Usa, Ōita

message: Today "Made in Japan" connotes high quality, technologically advanced manufacturing but during Japan's recovery from World War II it was synonymous with cheap shoddy products. Some exports were marked "MADE IN USA".
I removed this; see Snopes on the subject. --♥ «Charles A. L.» 05:32, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC)
:I inserted this anecdote about "Made in Usa". Thanks for supplying more info. I did not claim that a town was renamed "Usa" for a devious purpose. I do however have a dim memory of a childhood toy car, made from recycled Japanese tin cans (Japanese printing on the inside of the car), marked "MADE IN USA". 24.64.166.191 05:27, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how these urban legends are; there are always slightly different versions around. The version I heard was not that a town had been renamed Usa, but rather that goods intended for export were intentionally manufactured in the town that had always been called Usa, so that they could be labeled MADE IN USA. —Angr 13:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard this myth from my sixth grade teacher and was checking this page to see if there was any truth to it. Should the same information be placed on the [Usa, Kōchi] and [Usa District, Ōita] pages? 198.6.46.11 19:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's documented in one of the Big Secrets books by William Poundstone. I can look it up if you want. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The way this could be fairly easily cleaned up is if someone could post the actual background for the name choice.  As is, the Snopes article is disappointingly short of information and large on assumptions.  Given the formation period, it seems it would be a reasonable conjecture until proven otherwise.  JeopardyTempest (talk) 20:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

text: I'm an early boomer, and heard this urban myth from my father in the 1950s.  Also, I'm currently reading a book about the Battle of Leyte and it mentions aircraft production in Usa in 1944, showing that the town was there,and with that name before anybody would have had a reason to take advantage of its name.  Also, if anybody knows the town's history, expanding that section of the article would be appreciated.  JDZeff (talk)
There is no substantiation for the towns being renamed in 1967.  This seems to indicate it was known as Usa for much longer https://books.google.com/books?id=ELqbCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT107&dq=when+was+Usa,+%C5%8Cita+named&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj5pIvfnpLjAhXHzVQKHfNBBb8Q6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Usa&f=false
22:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Fallen (1998 film)

message: Why has so much of this page been removed? 202.169.180.120 (talk) 08:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: at the time, the plot summary was shortened. that particular trimming was restored.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass Removal 

message: Some of the reviews don't show a score at all which might explain it. Lmstearn (talk) 10:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's for a 2016 film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tomatometer now 7%