lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/ArmchairVexillologistDon/Proposed decision

message: [Re. the 2nd proposed injunction, moved from main page]
*If I may intervene, rather than suffer under a temporary injunction effecting my ability to edit any Canadian articles (which is the bulk of my activity on wikipedia) or political articles (which is the remainder of my activity) I will voluntarily withdraw from the three articles Don has been editing and associated talk pages and all other pages on vexillology and I will not engage in any debates or edit wars with Don on any other articles or talk pages he chooses to edit until the matter is resolved. If the ArbComm insists on the extremely broad injunction proposed above I prefer to withdraw my request for arbitration altogether. User:Homey 01:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: ArmchairVexillologistDon 16:42, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I came back August 6, 2005 ... Please reopen Arbitartion

message: User:Homey ([name removed]) wrote this back on Dec 17, 2004, 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/ArmchairVexillologistDon/Proposed_decision
:[Re. the 2nd proposed injunction, moved from main page]
:*If I may intervene, rather than suffer under a temporary injunction effecting my ability to edit any Canadian articles (which is the bulk of my activity on wikipedia) or political articles (which is the remainder of my activity) I will voluntarily withdraw from the three articles Don has been editing and associated talk pages and all other pages on vexillology and I will not engage in any debates or edit wars with Don on any other articles or talk pages he chooses to edit until the matter is resolved. If the ArbComm insists on the extremely broad injunction proposed above I prefer to withdraw my request for arbitration altogether. User:Homey  01:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone notice this?

message: I think it might make more sense to treat this as a new RFA rather than a reopened one as a) the complainants/impacted parties are different b) the body of evidence is different (or at least involve a significant addition) c) the issues   (ie using talk pages as chat rooms, personal attacks, original research) are not exactly the same as before, for instance the question of violating privacy or harassing users by posting their "real names" or other personal information is not an issue here where it was previously.
Certainly the issues overlap and evidence from the previous RFA is relevant but this really is a different RFA as far as I'm concerned (and I'm not interested in assuming the "complainant" role here).User:Homey 21:56, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopened RFA: questions
Talk:Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

message: There's a Text section that says "as proposed by", but it doesn't say this is the actual text.  I *assume* it is, but…
Then there's the following section that says "His draft language that later became the Fifth Amendment" which first makes one think it is the text but then says it was edited. --jae (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual text?  Hard to make heads or tails of this mess. 

message: Unless I am reading this incorrectly, the introductory statements seem to include a contradiction regarding the application of Due Process. The third sentence of the first paragraph reads, "The Fifth Amendment applies to every level of the government, including the federal, state, and local levels, in regard to a US citizen or resident of the US."
However, the second sentence of the third paragraph reads, "The Fifth Amendment's due process clause applies to the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies to state governments."
Reading these two statements together, I am unsure whether the Fifth Amendment's due process applies only to the federal government, or also to state and local governments. If there are two separate provisions within the Fifth Amendment, one of which applies to all levels and another which applies only to federal, I feel that this should be explicitly stated to avoid confusion. Otherwise, the description of the Amendment's application should be adjusted.
Adamcallis (talk) 03:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 14th Amendment is just reiteration of the Constitution. It's an act of saying State can not bar what's established in the US Constitution. States get their authority from the US Constitution and therefore must also follow the US Constitution, even if they draw up their own State Constitution. 73.225.182.47 (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification regarding the application of Due Process 

message: The first sentence currently reads:
„The Fifth Amendment (Amendment V) to as part of the Bill of Rights.“
„to as part of“ doesn’t seem to make sense, but I’m not a native English speaker, so I might just not know this strange language construction. 217.251.251.109 (talk) 06:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was vandalized twice recently; a small deletion in September much bigger deletion two days ago.  Unfortunately, active WP editors are spread way too thin right now, especially on legal articles, because the Wikimedia Foundation's incompetent management drives away so many editors.  I just fixed that.  Thanks for catching that. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct English language?
Talk:Lotte Giants

message: The surnames of the players SHOULD NOT BE IN UPPER CASE. Would whoever introduced this style disaster please waste a few minutes of their own time to return the names to lower case. Deiz talk 10:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, found the revision. Sorry if it interferes with any intermediate edits.. PC can you sort out the cats again? Deiz talk 10:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO NO NO 
Talk:Rosemont, Illinois

message: This article needs a section called history. The opening section just does not do this. I would like to know the older stuff of course like was it farm land in the 1800's but what I really mean is the development from a home owners association to a village. It really is a very interesting story. Many might view as negative but others might think it is grass roots democracy in action. The Stephens family and their hold on Rosemont might just be an example of good grass roots. I am impressed taking a home owner assoc to a village is a very big acomplishment also I think very unique. I can't write it, I hope someone else can.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.178.152.84 (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History

message: What is the difference between the two Rosemonts mentioned here?
Rosemont is home to the headquarters of Rosemont.
--Pqdave 15:36, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicolas Sarkozy

message: Please include it in the article. I apologize for not using additional sources at first.2601:447:4000:220:5EB:69E8:5A8B:EAF7 (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarkozy and 13 co-defendants have been convicted for the Bygmalion scandal
Talk:Chandigarh

message: I think there are far too many citations that refer to archive.org as their source. (The original pages apparently have gone away.) Isn't it preferable to have information found in pages that are live now rather leaning so heavily on archive.org to rescue the information? Sesquiannual (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense. Having both the live data and the archive.org together is the best of both worlds. It also lets you see when the information on the live site has changed. Thanks for your effort! Sesquiannual (talk) 00:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Too) many citations here are data rescued by archive.org 

message: The  used on this page is going to be replaced with  as per the Proposal and consensus of RFC. Any questions/suggestions? Discuss Here. 
You can also contribute by replacing Infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory on other pages , or by improving this one. Tojoroy20 (talk) 17:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced —  Tojoroy20 (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Replacement
Talk:Buddy Bolden

message: I would like to see a citation as to who says Buddy Bolden originated or invented the "Big Four." Aside Wynton Marsalis, in the Ken Burns documentary Jazz, I've never heard this. Certainly those who spoke on the famous Library of Congress recordings in the late 30s never credited him with this, and they knew him and remembered hearing him play. It's also odd that this was "invented" by a trumpeter and not a drummer. Not impossible, certainly, but odd. Marsalis has been accused of saying as "fact" some things in the Ken Burns documentary that as far as anyone knows have no basis in history, but since then claims that Bolden was behind the "Big Four" are uncontested. Hopefully we are not washing away the romanticism and mythology of jazz's origins with more romanticism and mythology. If we can't find a Marsalis-independent citation for this, I strongly feel it should be cut, or at the very least attributed solely to him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:8101:6A37:CD29:D91F:25D:E2D2 (talk) 02:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Big Four" 
Talk:Helmholtz Coils

message: ----
As stated by User:Michael_Hardy the page Helmholtz coil should be merged with Helmholtz Coils.
I create the page Helmholtz Coil following a link from requested page.
I do not know now what is the correct name to use.
Helmholtz Coils is not correct that the second word is uppercase.
The rules state that singular is to be preferred unless the word is generally plural in English (like scissors).
Now in English the word coil exist in singular but only one coil in a Helmholtz coil is not enouth to make the system, so there no exit a Helmoltz coil in singular. A way of giving out of this problem would be to named the article Helmholtz coils system. But I do not like this solution. This name is never used in Physics.
For the moment I will merge Helmholtz Coils into Helmholtz coil and I will create a redirect from Helmholtz Coils to Helmholtz coil and another from Helmholtz coils to Helmholtz coil AnyFile 16:56, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Installation 04

message: 129.15.138.194 recently took out a lot of information about the LaGrange points being incorrectly represented in the game. I can understand his reasoning, but one could also argue that it was valuable information, or, at least, moderately interesting. It should have been summarized or shortened, not taken out, I think. LockeShocke 17:20, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
:Well I just put it back. --pile0nadestalk | contribs 09:36, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Inverurie

message: This article is probably around 50% about the religious state of the town.  This seems a little inappropriate, and has potential implications for the neutrality of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.139.124 (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was me that included that info- isnt there some kind of presbyterian kirk (UP?) between the 'Bank of Ury' pub and the 'Tastie Bite' chipper on Inverurie High Street? --Fergie 07:13, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: This article contains a claim that Inverurie is the fastest growing town in Great Britain.
What is the source of this, it appears to have no source.
Tektim (talk) 18:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest growing town in GB 
Talk:University of Connecticut

message: This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 June 2019 and 12 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Apexrock45.
:The edits from 2019 that indicate something "will" happen in 2020 need to be updated for currency. 75.115.130.145 (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: Dude @ElKevbo stop reversing my edits. There are dozens of major institutions with more images in their alumni gallery. I added just like 6 additional, extremely relevant people (including a Nobel laureate and heads of state). If you are going to just reverse my edits, come up with better reasoning instead of just saying it's bloated. What is even the barometer for something being bloated. Better yet, contribute and discuss why some people should be included or not-- don't just blanket reverse. Edardfox (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Three different editors have reverted your edits: Drmies, GuardianH, and myself. Stop edit-warring, revert your edits, and develop a consensus here in Talk. ElKevbo (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni gallery
Talk:Wireless device radiation and health

message: Title! Desync-o-tron (talk) 01:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The link to the FDA studies on link 7 is broken. 

message: In response a few recent edit/revert cycles — involving me and user Plmoknqwerty (talk) — regarding the use of "misinformation" or "information" in the 5G subsection, I bring the matter to Talk. Should we keep "misinformation" or change the word to "information"? --papageno (talk) 03:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus of all the sources cited here is there is sufficient knowledge about radio waves, communications technology and viruses that the hypothesis that 5G affects the coronavirus is misinformation. That we do not have perfect knowledge of 5G — frankly we never have perfect knowledge about anything — does not stop us at WP from noting what the present consensus scientific view about a topic is. To make your point, you would need to find multiple reputable sources that say that 5G affects the coronvirus. Such sources do not exist, and hence your claim fails. If such sources became available, it would be reasonable to bring the matter back here to talk and make another case. --papageno (talk) 20:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Misinformation" or "information"? 

message: Footnotes 48 and 49 do not lead to valid links
 48 - "Wright v. Motorola, Inc. et al., No95-L-04929".
49 Christopher Newman, et al. v Motorola, Inc., et al. (United States District Court for the District of Maryland) ("Because no sufficiently reliable and relevant scientific evidence in support of either general or specific causation has been proffered by the plaintiffs, as explained below, the defendants’ motion will be granted and the plaintiffs’ motion will be denied."). Text
The Newman case appears to be referring to 218 F.Supp.2d 769 (2002). The Wright case is not findable and the link is bad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyberks (talk • contribs) 00:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court links no good 

message: Alexbrn, as I said in the edit summary, there are statements in that paragraph which are directly contradicted by later statements. It's not fine to have them there. Faulty (talk) 09:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory statements in the Cancer section

message: I would like to know why scientific studies were reverted from the Glucose metabolism chapter. Petenka (talk) 19:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glucose metabolism
Talk:New York Central Hudson

message: Since I wrote this, I now believe that the European 4-6-4 tanks were first (thus Baltic), but I don't have a cite either way. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 07:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which was first? 

message: There is no documentation in this article indicating that the engine --the subject of the article-- carried the Commodore Vanderbilt train. Therefore, the redirect from Commodore Vanderbilt (train) to this article needs to be struck.Dogru144 (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not struck, but changed target for "Commodore Vanderbilt (train)" to the specific section, and refined the reasons, as per the correct statement by Dogru144 that it was an engine rather than a named train set/service. Jmg38 (talk) 06:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Commodore Vanderbilt train redirect is in error

message: The Railfanning2022 (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2022
Talk:Pauly Shore

message: The name of his new reality show is "Minding the Store," not the Shore...a reference to his mother's comedy club, "The Comedy Store." Pacian 14:26, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Minding The Store / Shore

message: I feel like his work with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iconix_Entertainment Iconix's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pororo_the_Little_Penguin Pororo series deserves more emphasis.  Pororo is loved by children all over the world and this represents a new audience for Pauly Shore as well as a potential new direction for his later career.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:B000:2EB0:FD1A:67DE:983B:88F9 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2020 

message: Early Life states his mother founded The Comedy Store, but the article for his mother states that his father founded it, and his mother acquired it in the divorce. 71.182.160.129 (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother 

message: Filmography Section: 
Entourage: 2005-2007. Starring as himself. 67.87.248.243 (talk) 01:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be very apreciatable if you could give us a reliable source for this. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2022
Talk:Beth midrash

message: I have made some corrections, but this article clearly needs a refreshed focus: this article could potentially give a reader information about the architecture and use of study halls
1)the words structure, insitution, serves are used improperly
2)is a "characteristic" BM supposed to be a typical one? Most BMs have far more books than that
3)the comment about the probable location of study in the time of the Mishna is conjecture
4)this is a dictionary entry? the part about yeshiva is unnecessary. The reference to BMs changing roles is an anachronism, at least in the US. That is more reflective of the situation in pre-WW2 Europe.
5)should Jewish laws about the study hall be included?
Econapl 19:13, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -Andrew c [talk] 15:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: L'fi WP:COMMONNAME the page should be Beis Medrash, There were at least 200,000 more google hits for Beis Medrash than for the closest runner up. --Shuliavrumi (talk) 15:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beis/Beth midrash
Talk:Earthquake Management

message: Much of this material is in other articles already.
The first paragraph contains some new information that could be added to Earthquake prediction.
The second paragraph's content should be checked against Earthquake construction.
The third paragraph could be merged into Earthquake preparedness.
I don't know whether this article should be kept as a redirect or what.
----
The term is not in common use, and this article should be removed.
--Zeizmic 14:21, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of automotive fuel retailers

message: I find that under     * ENI - Italian petrol company (which directs to Escuela Nacional de Inteligencia)
:          IP - which isn't listed as a fuel brand.
:This isn't cool. Josh Parris 05:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous/wrong links 

message: This is a popular gas station here in Alaska. According to their website, they cover the Pacific Northwest and the northern Midwest. I don't know if they produce their own gas, so I didn't want to add them to this article yet. Info on their petroleum, which doesn't mention that it's bought from another company: . Should it be added? cluth 20:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holiday Stationstores 

message: Well known gasoline & petrol station brands from the Filling station article should be merged into this article and the other section eliminated.  There is no reason to try and maintain this data in two places.  Vegaswikian 00:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge 

message: Imperial Oil (Esso) is owned by Exxon Mobil. It operates under that name in Canada and uses the brand Esso, which is Exxon's international brand. It should be listed under Exxon Mobil because that is the parent company.
If it were to be left alone, then separate Shell Canada from Royal Dutch Shell as it has the same relationship Imperial Oil has to Exxon Mobil. Gunis del 03:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperial Oil 

message: How about Purple Martin, Blarney Castle, and Lassus? The first two had outlets in Michigan, and the third in Indiana. Zephyrad (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More brands 
Talk:Isola di San Michele

message: please correct the spelling of "michele" throughout the article.  the word has only one, not two, "l"s.
The article infers that the section "now closed" contains the graves of notable figures such as Pound, Stravinsky, etc.  However, in October 2008 there were no barriers to our viewing those sites.  138.88.183.89 (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Glenn

message: Why is the paragraph about Jeffrey Epstein included here? I get that it's sourced, but it boils down to "Glenn flew on one of his airplanes once." Its inclusion seems like an effort to imply something that isn't supported by sources. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That paragraph insignificant and should be completely removed. However, John Glenn is such an important subject that I feel hesitant to make anything other than minor edits to his page myself. SilverCobweb (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah...the fact that Glenn one time flew on an Epstein plane...this biographical article is incredibly long and editors have discretion and rely on editorial consensus as to what should/should not or what can possibly be included in articles. We can't stuff every factoid about Glenn into this article. I agree, this mention about him at the trial is not notable enough to include in the Personal life section. I've removed the content, if anyone disagrees, let's discuss. Shearonink (talk) 17:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epstein paragraph 

message: Glenn is more notable for his NASA career than his political career; and I think the picture in the infobox should reflect that. I'd suggest replacing it with his NASA portrait, File:John Glenn.jpg Saltywalrusprkl (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Glenn's notability when he was an astronaut and when he was a US Senator...I think his official Senate photo is fine in the infobox, his life didn't end when he was an astronaut.Shearonink (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the infobox picture be from the 1960s rather than his Senate portrait? 

message: The lead states that Glenn was an engineer - but his undergraduate degree was in chemistry, and he spent most of his adut life as an pilot, astronaut, or politician. He has an honorary doctorate in engineering, but an honorary degree does not make one an engineer. 71.11.5.2 (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry if I'm not understanding, but where in the lead does it say that Glenn was an engineer? GoldRomean (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. You saw it before I could note it here. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Thanks. GoldRomean (talk) 23:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engineer?