Talk:Zaid Shakir

message: Text document with red question mark.svg
	This article uses bare URLs for citations. Please consider adding full citations so that the article remains verifiable in the future. Several templates and the Reflinks tool are available to assist in formatting. (October 2011)
EARLY LIFE (quote) -
Zaid Shakir participates as a speaker at Islamic Society of North America annual conferences.{{Cite news| date = 2011-01-01 | title = Speakers Information | url = http://www.isna.net/programs/pages/speakers-services.aspx#65|accessdate=January 2011}
YEARS ABROAD (quote) -
......and writing and speaking frequently on a host of issues.
The above 2 citations have been corrected with references no. 1 and no. 2 above: Imzaid 05:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imzaid 

message: This paragraph "Imam Shakir has expressed a hope that the people of the United States submit to Islam, "Every Muslim who is honest would say, I would like to see America become a Muslim country. I think it would help people, and if I didn't believe that, I wouldn't be a Muslim. Because Islam helped me as a person, and it's helped a lot of people in my community""U.S. Muslim Clerics Seek a Modern Middle Ground" On page 4 of an article by Laurie Goodstein in The New York Times June 18, 2006
Stands on its own and has a reliable source. Let the reader decide what to think about it. Fred Talk 14:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the recent change. Looks good. Plot Spoiler (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hope for conversion

message: The name of the subject's wife doesn't need heavy duty reliable published sourcing. This edit is based on a misunderstanding of our policy. People know their own name and it is not subject to challenge by third parties in the absence of some issue. User:Fred Bauder Talk 19:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife's name

message: Per WP:BLP NPOV is especially important. Critique sections have long been phased out of Wikipedia, hence the tag. The tag is a notice to all editors to integrate the material if they feel it important, delete it if not. per this page, (opinion) the contents in that section are of no significance to merit inclusion in the bio period. Tags rational is self-explanatory in this case. --Inayity (talk) 21:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrate or delete notice 

message: In the "recent work in America" section (I'm not fond of that name either), there is an excessive amount of quoting at the bottom. These should be rewritten in narrative form though at the moment I don't have the energy for such rewrites myself. Perhaps someone could take the time to do so. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive quoting 

message: What is the justification for the category :Category:Muslim apologists? Where is the evidence that the subject has defended Islam against criticism? Tanbircdq (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hostility is unbecoming. I intend to un-follow this page. I intend not to respond further. Let's just leave things as they are. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete the cat it is so stupid it is beyond debate.--Inayity (talk) 09:04, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category