Talk:Men's health

message: Health should not be capitalized for this article, the article is about men's health in general, not about a magazine of that name.  See also: Women's health, with "health" not capitalized.  This move currently can't be done manually and requires the assistance of an administrator. Kurieeto 14:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Per above request on WP:RM which was unlikely to be controversial, I moved this page from Men's Health (upper case) to Men's health (lower case). Jonathunder 23:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization in article title

message: Looks like at least some of the article is copied directly from this page with no attribution.
http://coxclassroom.blogspot.com/2010/02/man-up-now-is-time-to-take-control-of.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elliotjordan (talk • contribs) 16:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This was done by the European Commission's Directorate General for Health & Consumers (DG-SANCO), it just came out two months ago and may be the best and most comprehensive study on this subject sofar:
*The State of Men’s Health in Europe (News Entry)
*The State of Men’s Health in Europe (The report itself)
— 139.18.182.30 (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major new source to incorporate into the article: Comprehensive EU study on Men's Health done by the European Commission's DG-SANCO 

message: The feminism part stated the following:
"A greater understanding of women's health issues had been one of the successes of the feminist movement, a development that drew attention to the fact that while men had dominated most societies in most fields, this did not extend to health and to life expectancy. By 2008, it was still the case that in the vast majority of countries, rich and poor, women could expect to outlive men."
I'm not quite sure who put this here but this section is irrelevant to the physiology and anatomy of male health and the social issues surrounding this should be put in another section. Additionally, I did some research into this topic and I have yet to find a single shred of evidence that feminists used this as part of their counterculture social movement in the 1900's (and I suspect that it never did draw attention due to the fact that it draws no parallel to any socially dominant issues whatsoever in both the 20th century and today). For this reason I've removed it as it's largely irrelevant and untrue; if someone feels the need to add it back, I suggest this be put into one of the feminism articles on Wikipedia and not here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.53.91.76 (talk) 03:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the feminism part 

message: The usage and topic of Men's Health is under discussion, see Talk:Men's Health (magazine) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Men's Health"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Men's health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160707120526/http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html to http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: There are a few students from McMaster University who are taking a course designed to improve the quality of health articles. We have chosen to improve this article, so there may be some significant changes occurring in the next few weeks. Cheers! #macbhsc2019F — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickBHSc21 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some significant updates to this article. 

message: Hi all, 
My group is proposing the removal of the template message regarding the article's global applicability. We have updated the introduction and the organizations sections to be more universal. Additionally we have added a life expectancy section which includes widely applicable facts and even a global visual. Additionally, we have added a conditions section which also is globally relevant. In the next week, we will also be adding a mental health section, including topics such as suicide, stress, and addiction in men. We strive in all our writing to remain inclusive and relevant to as many nations as possible.Khordeht (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing template message 

message: The diseases listed in the paragraph "Common conditions" is "conditions/diseases that have a high prevalence in men (relative to women)". Postpartum depression is also listed in this paragraph. 
The claim that Postpartum depression have a high prevalence in men is not mentioned in the reference data. Postpartum depression does not mentioned it. I am not sure it is true.
--Wolfch (talk) 14:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About "Postpartum depression" in the paragraph "Common conditions" 

message: The sentence "Men are difficult to recruit to health promotion interventions" is not a conclusion of the cited paper - it is only cited in there from a different paper that also does not come up with that conclusion. Londondare (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Men are difficult to recruit to health promotion interventions" not supported by the cited source