lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mandalorian

message: If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a new section below, do not inturrupt my comments here.
=== Raw count analysis ===
* Delete
** All
# EEMIV <nominator> (12 edits)
# Judgesurreal777	(2 edits)
# Funper	(2 edits)
# Gavin.collins	
# Doctorfluffy
# Jay32183
** Except Mandalorian
# Cryo921
# Sin Harvest
* Keep
** All
# Kizor	(4 edits)
# Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles	(7 edits)
# Colonel Warden	(2 edits)
** Mandalorian only
# Sin Harvest
 
* Merge
** All as Mandalorian
# RogueNinja
# DGG
# Dorftrottel
* Non-participatory
# DumbBOT - completing the listing process
# SineBot (edits=2) - doing that whole sinebot thing
# Jerry - relisting
# Gladys j cortez - comment with no discernable recommendation
# Dorftrottel (5 edits) - assumed to be sarcasm (or possibly drunk?)
* Single-purpose accounts and/or suspected sockpuppets
none
=== Valid Delete Arguments ===
* Fails WP:PLOT
* Fails WP:RS
* No assertion of real-world notability
* Only primary sources
* Fails WP:N
* Fails WP:Fiction
* Fails WP:V
=== Discounted delete arguments === 
* Better suited for Wookieepedia
=== Valid keep arguments ===
* Primary sources are mentioned in the articles that verfify the content
* 13 sources added during the afd
* Google Scholar has references
=== Discounted keep arguments ===
* Recognizable aspect of fictional universe
* High level of reader interest
* Probably covered in science fiction magazines
=== Summary ===
This was alot to sort through.  Some bad faith and sarcasm made it a little difficult to grab as a snapshot.  In the end there are certainly more people calling for deletion of most of these articles, and their arguments are more sound than the keepers.  DGG's explanation sums it up best, methinks, the main article should not have been bundled here.  As a standalone AFD, it would have probably been snowed... bundling it does not help matters... it makes for a messy afd like this one.  My decision is Merge all into Mandalorian.  Since this requires keeping the articles and redirecting them, and since I will not be the one doing the merging, this will result in a keep closure for all with instruction to editors to merge them accordingly. JERRY talk contribs 02:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrator's closing rationale 

message: This was alot to sort through.  Some bad faith and sarcasm made it a little difficult to grab as a snapshot.  In the end there are certainly more people calling for deletion of most of these articles, and their arguments are more sound than the keepers.  DGG's explanation sums it up best, methinks, the main article should not have been bundled here.  As a standalone AFD, it would have probably been snowed... bundling it does not help matters... it makes for a messy afd like this one.  My decision is Merge all into Mandalorian.  Since this requires keeping the articles and redirecting them, and since I will not be the one doing the merging, this will result in a keep closure for all with instruction to editors to merge them accordingly. JERRY talk contribs 02:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:Old Economy

message: Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos may be available for this site.
*Some of NRHP photos linked in article may be public domain.
*New photos would be helpful.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Doncram (talk) 02:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I just added a picture of the Rapp House in Old Economy Village to this page as an example of Harmony Society architecture that one can see in Old Economy.  Hope this helps. Geneisner (talk) 13:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Should this article be merged in with the article about Old Economy Village, since "Old Economy", "Economy Historic District" and "Old Economy Historic District" are basically the same thing as Old Economy Village?  Just wondering. Geneisner (talk) 13:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - I think these articles should be merged.  Jllm06 (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, should the Old Economy, Pennsylvania article be merged in with the article about Old Economy Village, since it's basically the same thing too?  I also wonder if the Harmony Historic District article should be merged in with the Harmony, Pennsylvania article, or not?  Are there parts of Harmony, PA, that aren't in the Harmony Historic District?  I don't know.  I've been there, but don't know for sure on that one. Geneisner (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When I was at Harmony in Butler County, it was obvious that some parts of the borough were not part of the district.  Nyttend (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Regina von Habsburg

message: She was in effect only the titular Crown Princess of Austria, Hungary and Bohemia, since the titles of nobility were abolished in these countries and law forbids their usage.
: So, if the law forbids the use of these titles, what are we doing according her such a title?   --  202.142.129.66 (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Is Wikipedia bound by the laws of Austria? Of course it is not bound by any law. Otherwise, Wikipedia would not be able to mention any criticism of (for example) the King or Queen of Thailand, thanks to lèse majesté, nor any criticism of Ali Khamenei, thanks to the Blasphemy law in Iran. Anyway, I believe the article should now be moved to Princess Regina of Saxe-Meiningen in order to be consistent with articles about other princesses but there is nothing wrong with referring to her as Archduchess Regina because that's how English language sources refer to her. Surtsicna (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe that the laws of Austria forbid other people from calling Regina "Crown Princess of Austria". I think it is more in terms of the person's own legal identity IN Austria. By the way, photos from Regina lying in state show a photograph off to the side with the caption Erzherzogin Regina. I think the article now should be titled Princess Regina of Saxe-Meiningen as well. Seven Letters 00:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A move to Princess Regina of Saxe-Meiningen would now be best. Ruby2010 (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why are we breaking the law?
Talk:Southeastern Community College (North Carolina)

message: While I'm not the author of this page, I don't know that it qualifies as advertising. I do think that in its current state it is likely a copyright violation of http://www.sccnc.edu/presidentmessage.htm
I do think that this page could be taken down to a stub without the copyright issues with requests for expansion - see Chattanooga State Technical Community College among other community colleges (that was just the first one I knew off off the top of my head -I'm sure there are more).  Lcarscad (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is not advertizing, then any paragraph that begins with the words We are deeply committed should be deleted and no attempt should be made to rephrase anything in said paragraph. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 02:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: The article looks satisfactory now. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 02:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Litter (zoology)

message: This article needs some info on rejection of animals in a litter. -Rolypolyman (talk) 02:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rejection
Talk:Desert Financial Credit Union

message: --Pearrari (talk) 02:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rauvolfia serpentina

message: Can someone show where this plant normally grow?  I'm interested in the history, and I have indication that this plant was also grown in the middle east, possibly in Asia Minor as well.
98.247.77.63 (talk) 02:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They grow in moist forests and shady places near rain-forests in Indian subcontinent and in China. Difficult to cultivate; but possible. Jee 13:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the native range of this plant?

message: The best example of bioprospecting today...using traditional knowledge is reserpine, the anti-hypertensive alkaloid from Rauwolfia serpentina."  I just took out the garbage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.52.118 (talk) 04:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This anti hypertensive herbal medicine is being vandalized, slandered, and misrepresented.
Talk:Curricle

message: Why was this moved here? -- œ™ 06:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:1st Tony Awards

message: article notes "nominees not shown."  not shown because they were never disclosed (or construct of nominees didn't even exist)?  not easily retrievable?  space contraints?
my guess is they were never disclosed in the early years.  either way, this article (and other early years (i.e, 2nd tony awards, etc. through out tony award project until nominees appear]] should probably explain why --71.183.238.134 (talk) 08:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that they simply were not announced in the early years; until, I think, the 1956 awards. But, I just can not find any WP:RS to support that, other than the rather obvious lack of a list of nominees until 1956. A puzzelment as to how to convey this...Flami72 (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  nominees 
Talk:Arresting, Germany

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 21:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Arresting →  – No clear primary topic, Arrest has 4,281 views, Arresting gear has 3,654 compared with only 23[] for the village. Google, Images and Books only return the generic meanings. Arresting (village) is another possibility if the country qualifier is ambiguous with the generic meaning happening in Germany. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 September 2022
Talk:Bavarian State Police

message: "The police force is well-known for coordinated, brutal, and consistent actions against even minor crimes"
Reference missing? Seems biased. Relevance for introduction statement also questionable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.217.55.78 (talk) 12:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially questionable/biased content
Talk:East Franconian German

message: Shouldn't it rather be East Frankish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.132.24.228 (talk) 08:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

message: "The scope of East Franconian is disputed, mainly in its extent in Nuremberg, the second-largest city of Bavaria. Within one of the definitions the border of East Franconian is to include Erlangen and to exclude neighboring Nuremberg as a part of the Northern Austro-Bavarian language area." 
Languages change during centuries and so did East Franconian German. Nuremberg´s franconian   was more or less influenced by people from Upper Palatinate esp. in 19th when industrialization made Nuremberg growing.
But today Nuremberg´s language is obviously East Franconian. There are some local differencies to Wuerzburg or Bamberg, even to Fuerth. Native speakers are able to find out if s.o. is from Unterfranken, Oberfranken, Westmittelfranken ( Ansbach/Feuchtwangen), Ostmittelfranken (Fuerth, Erlangen, Nuremberg), Hohenlohe etc. But these are all subgroups of one dialect. The map in the article is right.Kleeblatt (talk) 13:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuremberg 

message: Sorry, the map on the right side (Oberdeutsch 1945) in JorisvS version of 30 June is wrong. Here´s a correct one from german wikipedia:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Verbreitungsgebiet_der_oberdeutschen_Mundarten.PNG
I don´t know how to change it. 
The map on the left side is correct (East Franconian). Nuremberg and it´s surroundings speak east franconian, but east franconian ends near Suhl, in Eisenach they speak Thuringian. Kleeblatt (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong map!

message: East Franconian is researched by "Fränkisches Wörterbuch" in Fürth. It is a project of Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften and Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg. For decades questionaires were collected and evaluated. There are an oline dictionary and a blog.
https://wbf.badw.de/das-projekt.html
http://www.wbf.badw.de/wbf-digital.html
https://fraenkisch.hypotheses.org/author/fraenkisch  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManfredV (talk • contribs) 12:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fränkisches Wörterbuch
Talk:Landshut Wedding

message: I don't see a schedule - I think the next one is in 2021, but I don't really speak German  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.193.204 (talk) 00:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In the very beginning it was once a year, then every third year. Since the 1980s, the established schedule is every fouth year, due to the increased size and also conveniently avoiding occurrences with World and Euro football championships and the Olympic Games. So, it was in 2005, 2009, 2013, 2017 and would have been scheduled for 2021. The "time in between" has been exceptionally increased to six years due to Covid for this once, so the next is in 2023, followed by 2027, 2031, etc., in case God wills it and we're yet alive.--138.245.1.1 (talk) 15:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Befreiungshalle

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Befreiungshalle Hall of Liberation Kelheim.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 14, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-11-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Befreiungshalle Hall of Liberation Kelheim.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Befreiungshalle Kelheim BS.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 9, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-06-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Befreiungshalle Kelheim BS.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Brennhausen

message: In the discussion of the name, the article says, "immediately next to the settlement a stream springs forth which flows into the river Saale."  I suspect this is supposed to be the Franconian Saale, which is different from the Saale usually meant when the name "Saale" is used by itself.  But since the article is referring to the source of the river, I'm not entirely sure; the Fanconian Saale and the other Saale arise just a few miles apart.  I checked the German Wikipedia article, but it doesn't refer to the Saale at all.  Maybe someone who knows of a clear reference for this could clarify the statement.  140.147.236.195 (talk) 13:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Franconian Saale is the Saale referenced.  It is a good question as locally, The Franconian Saale is simply referred to as the Saale. --CSvBibra (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Saale
Talk:Schloss Johannisburg

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Aschaffenburger Schloss, edit.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 17, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-07-17. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Aschaffenburger Schloss, edit.jpg]]
Talk:Linderhof Palace

message: Is it just me, or was this article better in 2013? The pictures no longer match up with the sections which discuss them. Captions no longer match some pictures. Some of the new photos are not described in the text.
Is this stuff worth fixing? Or should we just let the article deteriorate? 98.81.167.67 (talk) 21:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest moving the untalked about images to a gallery. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better last year? 
Talk:USS Tulsa (PG-22)

message: Someone has confused USS Asheville (PGM-84) for USS Asheville (PG-21) as the lead ship of the class that USS Tulsa (PG-22) belongs. In other words, the link to USS Asheville at the beginning of the introduction is wrong. jmdeur 13:30 3 May 2008 (UTC)
:Corrected link to PG-21. Bruin2 (talk) 20:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is an important topic demonstrating the international history of Oklahoma.  More citations are needed.  Thank you to the author for starting this article.--Tintle (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2
Talk:Rottenbuch Radio Tower

message: Hi  Regarding your removal of the refimprove tag, when I placed that tag there was only one reference shown, and it was cited only once (in the second sentence of the article text); most of the article was unreferenced. Also, the source in question appears to be a conference paper of some sort, written by a single author, so it's debatable whether it counts as RS. The other external links may or may not support the article contents, but as they are not properly cited this is difficult to verify. Therefore, I don't think the refimprove tag was unjustified, but now that you've removed it I certainly don't intend to go to edit war over this. :) Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The information was contained in the "External links". Now, I changed these to "references" included at the appropriate places (dropping one which was redundant). I hope that this is more clear now. -- Karl432 (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Basilica of the Fourteen Holy Helpers

message: I know it has already been done but I think it was worthy of discussion as to whether to change names from German to English.  Outside of Wikipedia is the name "Basilica of the Fourteen Holy Helpers"  used other than a translation of the name?  Los Angeles is a spanish name and people refer to her as "the city of angels" but an article on Los Angeles would not be primarily listed as "City of Angels".  A redirect from "City of Angels" to Los Angeles would be appropriate not the other way around.--CSvBibra (talk) 17:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change to Basilica of the Fourteen Holy Helpers
Talk:47th Tony Awards

message: What was the source for this information?  I have a distinct memory of seeing one of the songs from 'Anna Karenina' being sung, but I don't remember which song or who was the actress.  It had to have been during this awards show I would have thought since Anna was nominated for some of the awards during the 47th awards show.  Too bad I didn't tape the performance.
Duane1024 (talk) 02:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Communist Party (Marxist–Leninist) (United States)

message: Is this the same organization as the one described in Communist Party USA (Marxist-Leninist)?  They sound very similar: American, "Marxist-Leninist", and Maoist, but the dates don't quite match. --Saforrest (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Communist Party USA (Marxist–Leninist)

message: Is this the same organization as the one described in Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) (USA)?  They sound very similar: American, "Marxist-Leninist", and Maoist, but the dates don't quite match. --Saforrest (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Party Name Similarity

message: I really don’t see the justification for removing mention of her article.  The name of the party is right there in the title!  It’s about laski in his capacity as leader of the cpusa(ml).  A significant piece of the party’s history, almost the only thing that makes them notable actually.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laski22 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: didion’s article
Talk:Addison Road (band)

message: --- I reverted the "In the bathroom edit" per the Addison Road interview on 104.1 KFIS, 12-04-09  Guerberj (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please tell me that this embarrassing vandalism didn't make it on the radio! I must have missed it. Thanks for cleaning it up. Royalbroil 13:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I've added references for the band's goodbye, expanding references. User:Dolphx  —Preceding comment added 17:16, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Goodbye
Category talk:Airport infrastructure

message: Providing listing here of contents of :Category:Unusual runways, in case category is deleted. 
1996 Air Africa crash
Courchevel Airport
Gibraltar Airport
Gilgit Airport
Goma International Airport
Juancho E. Yrausquin Airport
Kai Tak Airport
Madeira Airport
Princess Juliana International Airport
Tenzing-Hillary Airport
1996 Air Africa crash
Courchevel Airport
Gibraltar Airport
Gilgit Airport
Goma International Airport
Juancho E. Yrausquin Airport
Kai Tak Airport
Madeira Airport
Princess Juliana International Airport
Tenzing-Hillary Airport
--Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unusual airport runways
Talk:Escape to Chimp Eden

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080201162901/https://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/01/chimps_find_eden_on_animal_pla.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hans Baumann (writer)

message: Having made the bibliography, I heard there was another Hans Baumann who wrote children's books, so I cut it down to the ones I know for now. However, I see that all the books are listed on the German Wikipedia article, so does anyone know if this Hans Baumann did write the other books? Robina Fox (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 