Talk:Kadokawa Daiei Studio

message: During the time period in which the now Kadokawa Pictures was owned by Tokuma Shoten, multiple OVA were created and attributed to a Daiei Co., Ltd. such as Lesson XX and La Blue Girl.  Some research has led me to believe that this was the work of Kadokawa Pictures at the time.  If others agree with this inference, then I would like to link the articles' studios to this page and add to this article concerning these.
Also, this link has a list of other OVAs produced by this Daiei Co. Ltd.:
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/company.php?id=77  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mister Fredrick (talk • contribs) 06:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: OVA Attribution

message: :Image:DaieiCompany.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DaieiCompany.jpg

message: :Image:Gamera 1965.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gamera 1965.jpg

message: As it stands, links for Daiei all end up on this page, even though Daiei had a long and rich history that was completely separate from Kadokawa for decades. To put the history of Daiei under that of the company that eventually bought it up is like trying to put all the companies that made up General Motors on one page. The Japanese Wikipedia puts Daiei on a separate page, and so should the English Wikipedia.--Michitaro (talk) 09:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-proposed splitting the articles on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Japanese cinema task force talk page. Michitaro (talk) 14:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting article 

message: This article seems to have confused two topics: (1) the history of Kadokawa's various motion picture divisions, which executive produce and distribute movies, and (2) the Kadokawa Daiei Studio, which is the name of a physical movie studio complex and the production company which runs it.
The Japanese article this English one is is linked to is only about the the Kadokawa Daiei Studio. But the English one is in all but name about Kadokawa's motion picture ventures. The Japanese article about Kadokawa-branded motion picture companies in general is https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%A7%92%E5%B7%9D%E6%98%A0%E7%94%BB and there is another specifically about the now defunct "KADOKAWA PICTURES" company at https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%A7%92%E5%B7%9D%E6%98%A0%E7%94%BB_(%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD)
Considering that there almost nothing about the Kadokawa Daiei Studio in this English article, I think it should be moved to a more appropriate name and linked to https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%A7%92%E5%B7%9D%E6%98%A0%E7%94%BB
A different article that actually is about the Kadokawa Daiei Studio could then be created and linked to https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%A7%92%E5%B7%9D%E5%A4%A7%E6%98%A0%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%82%B8%E3%82%AA --Tempjrds (talk) 12:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article has confused two different topics