lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Agusan del Norte

message: Why is the population of Butuan City included? In the Butuan City article is says that Butuan is a highly urbanized city. Magalhães (talk) 09:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  population 

message: What city is the provincial capital for this province? Butuan city or Cabadbaran city?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.38.46.6 (talk) 13:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  capital 

message: According to info box the land area of this province is: 2,730.24 km2. But when i look it up in the source that is given it states: 354,686 hectares. I tried to correct it. But apparently widata is used here? Not sure how to correct it. Either the source or the number should be changed. Magalhães (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On wikidata I see now that the area of Butuan City is subtracted from the total.. I guess that explains the difference. Magalhães (talk) 10:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  land area
Talk:Dim sum

message: A few times that I've gone for Dim Sum, I've been able to snag a dessert item, that is about 3/4" thick, sliced in triangular chunks about 2"x3". These are white, a bit rubbery,  taste like rice and honey, are flat on the top, but have a not-quite-honeycomb lattice on the bottom. (And are delicious!!) I've asked what the name is, and I've forgotten the chinese name, but I was told the english translation is "Rice Cake" or "White Rice Cake". I came to this article to try to learn more about it (re-learn what its name is, so I can ask for it properly, or try to look for recipes....), but it's not here. :( Does anyone know what this dish is, and what it's (properly) called? And can it please get added to this article? It doesn't taste like coconut, so it's not coconut jelly. Thanks!  173.206.137.186 (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  White rice cake? 

message: The wonderful Sesame Ball is shown as Jin Deui here, but the link is to the article on Jian Dui! Not so much as a disambig! Is one of those the proper (transliterated) name... or maybe both? I think there are two fillings: red bean paste and lotus paste. Do the pastries have different names depending on the filling? Tzf (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jin deui or Jian dui? 

message: Another Xin Nian dish, with the center of jin deui (red bean paste usually) but the chewy dough is uncooked, sweet, and wrapped in a leaf like Lo Mai Gai. What is the correct name for this? Tzf (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Lo Mai Ban? (Sticky Jin Deui)

message: https://redhousespice.com/mango-pancake/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.44.56 (talk) 04:14, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Mango pancakes doesn't appear to be an existing article. It probably should be created before it is linked to on this page. Sakura CarteletTalk 04:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  please add the following topics 

message: While the article does use some of the images to identity the food as well as some of the tea commonly used, much of the food in the article mentioned does not have an image to reference to. Jennil12988 (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the article include images that enhance understanding the topic?  

message: Submitted a request to the Guild of Copy Editors for Copy Editing in preparation for a Good Article Nomination.  Hope people can help out on the feedback and move this towards a good article.  Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Copy editing was completed on August 4, 2020.  --Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 02:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

text: I will be copy editing this article. Edipio (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you very much.  Renewableandalternativeenergy (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Editing
Talk:Auschwitz (disambiguation)

message: I wonder if this should be a disambiguation page. Martin 00:18, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguate?

message: and , can you explain why you keep removing links? Even if you want to remove the links to Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II (both subsections), Auschwitz III and List of subcamps of Auschwitz are stand-alone articles. Why can't they be included? SarahSV (talk) 03:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is a disambiguation page that helps readers to navigate articles. If a reader is interested in Auschwitz the concentration camp, s/he can navigate to the main article, which, in its lead paragraph and the body of the article, signposts well the other related articles that are available. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , thanks for the response. Why do you prefer that readers click on another article to find the one they might be looking for here? If there's a guideline to that effect, please link to it. There's a lot of confusion and ignorance about Auschwitz, so it would be helpful if this page could be comprehensive and precise. SarahSV (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello  It's because a disambiguation page "Foo (disambiguation)" has a primary topic "Foo" (at the top) and lists other uses of the term "Foo", e.g. a film, a book, and a place. If a reader types "Foo" into the search box (or navigates directly to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/foo) they'll end up at the "Foo" primary topic article. If that's not what they want (say they want the film), a hatnote might take them to the disambiguation page, which helps them navigate to the page they want. The disambiguation page is not the place to clear up confusion and ignorance about the primary topic: the primary topic article is.  In this case there's a primary topic redirect (WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT) from Auschwitz to Auschwitz concentration camp.  It's highly likely that a searcher looking for information about Auschwitz is going to start at the primary topic article, and not the disambiguation page. There's guidance on disambiguation generally at WP:DAB, and style at MOS:DAB. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

text: The question could be reversed: can you explain why you put article content on a non-article navigation page. Disambiguation pages are for resolving ambiguity in article titles, a workaround to the technical problem where two articles on Wikipedia can't have the same title. Article content is for imparting information (such as resolving confusion and ignorance). -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of links
Talk:Separation of church and state

message: with Baptists in Early America? It clearly had ancient and Medieval origins, as briefly discussed in this article. This article also seems to present a caricature of Medieval Europe as a theocracy, an erroneous view that Medievalists have worked hard to correct. Here's some research discussing the European origins of this idea which was inspired primarily by the Bible . Jonathan f1 (talk) 01:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The concept "originated"
Talk:Nurse uniform

message: My addition "However, student nurses are more likely to wear practical and durable "scrubs", eschewing the old-fashioned cap and ruffles these days" was deleted. 
Not sure who did it, or why.  Explanations, theories?
:I don't know; look in the article history. If you reinforce your addition with a reference, it most likely will resist deletion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rintrah (talk • contribs) 17:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This whole wiki page needs updating - it's so out dated. Mwnt888 (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

text: In Woking Hospital.Andering J. REDDSON (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

text: It is useful to know how the whites developed historically.Andering J. REDDSON (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Although the traditional nursing whites is rarely, if ever, worn outside of "dress enviroments" (most of questionable medical nessesity), it is useful to know how the whites developed historically. For example, the militry's Female Combination Cover devloped from the nurse's cap, linking current ladies in uniform to the nun's of old- Even if the lady in question is, say, an inftantryman in Iraq, or a bomber pilot over Afghanistan.Andering J. REDDSON (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I have added the pics now, however it would be better if they were side-by-side, ratehr one on top of the other as they are now; I don't know how to do it correctly. It would be more respectful to show them side-by-side.Andering J. REDDSON (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

message: As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to low per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale.  I have also added start class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 04:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NURSE]] priority review

message: I've never heard it called a "nurse uniform"—nor have I ever heard "doctor scrubs" or "soldier helmet." That's just now how such things are typically expressed. "Nurse's uniform" is the usual term (as it appears in one of the subheadings). That locution should be used in the title and throughout the article. Would the author care to make the changes? KC 09:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nurse uniform"
Talk:Word puzzle

message: This article was nominated for deletion. The result was no consensus, but some merging/redirecting might be in order. For details, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer. -- BD2412 talk 00:40, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
It was nominated immediately again, discussion in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/MoreKarlScherer. The result this time was merge and redirect to word game. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD results
Talk:Lava Beds National Monument

message: Under the History, Archeological Site section, in the sentence:
  "The region is the of the Modoc people."
there appears to be an omitted word.  I would guess "homeland", as in 
  "The region is the homeland of the Modoc people."
but I am no expert on the area.
Can anyone confirm and edit?  Thanks.
Freemanme (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History, Archeological Site - typo?
Talk:Killings and massacres during the 1948 Palestine war

message: Change  'Kfar Etzion massacre where around 120-150 defenders' to 'Kfar Etzion massacre where around 120-150 residents,' the specifics are debated but multiple sources have confirmed people who were hiding weaponless or had surrendered were murdered. 68.34.29.140 (talk) 20:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. L293D (☎ • ✎) 22:02, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 April 2018 

message: In his book, Morris says the Palestinians suffered "slightly higher, or much higher," than the Israeli losses. The current text leaves out the last three words. Mcdruid (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morris estimation of casualties 

message: In the line about how many Arabs died, Benny Morris is stated as claiming "The number of victims on the Arab side is unclear, but according to Benny Morris, it might have been slightly higher." In the actual book, Morris says: "Palestinian losses, in civilians and armed irregulars, are unclear: they may have been slightly higher, or much higher, than the Israeli losses. (Morris 2008, pg. 528). Total Arab losses is higher: he goes on to mention "Egyptian losses, according to an official Egyptian announcement made in June 1950, amounted to some fourteen hundred dead and 3,731 "permanently invalided."27 The Jordanian, Iraqi, and Syrian armies each suffered several hundred dead, and the Lebanese suffered several dozen killed." Mcdruid (talk) 09:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the source and you are correct so I added the extra words. Zerotalk 12:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 April 2020
Talk:Execution (disambiguation)

message: I think it's also realisation/sale of an asset in UK law.90.190.225.121 (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Wikipedia:Disambiguation says:
:Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving conflicts that arise when a potential article title is ambiguous, most often because it refers to more than one subject covered by Wikipedia, either as the main topic of an article, or as a subtopic covered by an article in addition to the article's main topic. For example, the word "Mercury" can refer to a chemical element, a planet, a Roman god, and many other things.
:There are three important aspects to disambiguation:
:Naming articles in such a way that each has a unique title. For example, three of the articles dealing with topics ordinarily called "Mercury" are titled Mercury (element), Mercury (planet) and Mercury (mythology).
:Making the links for ambiguous terms point to the correct article title. For example, an editor of an astronomy article may have created a link to Mercury, and this should be corrected to point to Mercury (planet).
:Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be. For example, the page Mercury is a disambiguation page—a non-article page which lists various meanings of "Mercury" and which links to the articles that cover them. (As discussed below, however, ambiguous terms do not always require a disambiguation page.)
Execution means much more than simply a judicial killing.  This disambiguation page does not correctly reflect that when it doesn't say so in the lede. 69.5.112.154 (talk) 04:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article execution is the WP:primary topic. When there is a primary topic, it is placed in the opening line of the disambiguation page. A dictionary definition is generally not included. older ≠ wiser 09:37, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article Execution is a redirect to Capital punishment.  But the disambiguation page refers to other articles having that word that is not about capital punishment or the death penalty.  Namely Execution (computing).  The lede to the disambiguation page is misleading if the primary definition of the word "execution" is not spelled out. 69.5.112.154 (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely. Execution redirects to capital punishment because that is the primary topic for the term. If you don't feel that is correct, you may want to consider starting another move discussion. As it is, there is a primary topic and the formatting is described at MOS:DABPRIMARY. And guidance at WP:DABDIC is clear that dictionary definitions should not be included.older ≠ wiser 11:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent revert
Talk:Hamm's Bear

message: I am new to discussing things on Wikipedia, so please forgive any potential faux pas....
I was just at the Detroit Zoo, and there is a black bear on display there who had been rescued. According to the Detroit Zoo, "Hamms the bear" had at one time been a mascot for Hamms Beer.  When he was two, he was sold to a private individual in Iowa.  For twenty years, he was kept in a small cage in the backyard and had been tormented by trespassing vandals.  Hamms had even been stabbed in the nose by a pitchfork.  The bear bit the owner and was to be destroyed, but an animal welfare organization; along with the Detroit Zoo stepped in and pleaded for his release.  He is now learning to do basic bear activities at the zoo, alongside a couple of female bears.
Is this something that should be noted on this page?  Thanks!Gretchen1111 20:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamm's Bear at the Detroit Zoo? 
Talk:Claude Piron

message: In this edit: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Claude_Piron&oldid=925676824
a condemnation of bonlingvism as counter-fundamental is given, sourced to "Standard Esperantology."  The actual citation of the passage is from here:
https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlina_Komentario_pri_la_Fundamento_de_Esperanto
- it's from a commentary about the Fundamento called the "Berlin Commentary."
I don't know if that particular commentary has any authoritative weight, but I have no reason to believe it's anything more than one Esperantist's opinions.  
It isn't named "Standard Esperantology" and I can't find any references to a work called "Standard Esperantology" anywhere but on this wikipedia page.
Bonlingvism -- which is an intra-Esperanto movement which bases its ideas on Claude Piron, but was not created by Claude Piron, and which picked up steam only after his death -- is a controversial topic; however it is not part of Claude Piron's life and work.  This edit makes serious charges against Bonlingvism -- essentially, that it is not really Esperanto.  Whatever the merit of these charges, it has no particular relevance on a page about the man himself, and seems to be mere expression of animus against a particular group.  
Given that, and the fact that it is accompanied by a citation ostensibly to "Standard Esperantology" and yet in the footnote *actually* links to nothing whatsoever called "Standard Esperantology" I don't think this edit is appropriate for this page. Edheil (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What in the world is "Standard Esperantology"
Talk:Latin phonology and orthography

message: If you read the article "On the Evolution of Short High Vowels of Latin into Romance" by Andrea Calabrese, you'll see that he contests Allen's Classical Latin vowel system as [iː ɪ eː ɛ ä(ː) ɔ oː ʊ uː]. According to Calabrese, Classical Latin had a vowel system with five different qualities, i.e. [i(ː) ɛ(ː) ä(ː) ɔ(ː) u(ː)], with no quality distinction between long and short vowels, at least until the 1st century AD. YanisBourgeois (talk) 00:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this has been discussed before (see archives). Calabrese's view, unfortunately popularized by some youtuber, runs counter to the overwhelming scholarly majority in favour of Allen's. It is mentioned in footnote #4 already. Nicodene (talk) 13:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet I haven't seen a counterargument against Calabrese's vowel system other than the argument of majority. It has been discarded as a minority view, but not debunked (or maybe I'm wrong, please tell me if I am). Thanks for your response YanisBourgeois (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I'm saying that Calabrese hasn't been debunked is that nobody as far as I know has justified Allen's vowel system for Classical Latin while taking into account Calabrese's objection to Allen. All the sources that justify Allen's vowel system accept as a premise that Classical Latin is the most recent "common ancestor" to the Western Romance Languages (French, Spanish, Portuguese, etc.) which is incorrect. Those languages, used to justify Allen's system, are actually descended from Vulgar Latin. So Allen may very well have described Vulgar Latin while believing to describe Classical Latin. The Romance languages that actually descend from Classical Latin as opposed to Vulgar Latin (e.g. Sardinian) tend to indicate Calabrese's vowel system. YanisBourgeois (talk) 09:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOTFORUM and WP:FRINGE. We can discuss this on my private talk page or yours, if you like, but such a discussion will have no impact on this article. Nicodene (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality contrast between long and short vowels
Talk:South Platte River

message: A separate article has been created to cover fly fishing -- possibly it should be incorporated here... Regards, Ariconte (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[South Platte Fly Fishing]] ?? 

message: "Jesús María" or "Jesús y María"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.8.98.118 (talk) 11:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish 18th-century name? 

message: Quite surprised to find that this article is completely missing any mention of the catastrophic regional flood, and record Denver flood, from 1965.  I'll try to get back here and drop some sources.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 21:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is missing the catastrophic 1965 Platte River flood 

message: I would be good to see some source supporting the claim that Chatfield Reservoir is a major source of Denver Water. By Denver Water's info 80% of Denver Waters' supply is diverted above Chatfield Reservoir, by a diversion from Strontia Springs Dam to the Foothills Water Treatment Plant (near Roxborough) and an in-stream diversion to the Marston Treatment Plant, both above Chatfield. Based on this info I am changing "a major source of drinking water" to "a flood control basin"
Elrey (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chatfield a Denver Water source? Not likely
Talk:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: The Original Radio Scripts

message: I have therecent reprint (25th anniversary edition) - I just checked and no dialogue is missing for Fit the 12th, nor any other thant I noticed. I've removed the comment about it. GRAHAMUK 10:16 15 Jul 2003 (UTC)
:Which edition is the dialogue meant to be missing from? I've compared Fit the Twelfth from the first US edition (1985) to the 2003 anniversary edition and I don't notice any difference either. --JohnDBuell 02:25, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the American first and 10th anniversary editions and both versions of Fit The 12th are identical. Is it only the UK first edition that is incorrect? Ttenchantr (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For those Wikipedians with this book, would someone please post an ISBN Link in this page?
:Done. --JohnDBuell 17:34, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN? 
Talk:Bastille Day

message: Under the header Bastille Day celebrations in other countries, I reformatted the section from a bullet-point list to sub-header sections. This change was made to make it easier to see which countries celebrate Bastille Day outside of France. I added more detailed information about each countries' celebration, to give a more cohesive understanding of how Bastille Day is celebrated around the world. I also added a section about the celebration of the holiday in Tahiti. Under the United States section, I edited the format so that the information about each states' celebration was in paragraph form under a sub-header of their location within the United States. These edits were made to make the section easier to read and add more information about the different celebrations themselves.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcadieux22 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Information and Edits made to the Celebrations in other countries section 

message: Can someone fix this please? Not true: Homme with an uppercase h meaning "human", while homme with a lowercase h means "man"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:C700:6650:C492:9872:DA20:5358 (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding of French 