lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ryūkyū proper

message: I've renamed this article from Ryukyu proper to Ryūkyū proper in accordance with the guidelines in the Manual of Style for Japanese articles. Bobo12345 12:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article renamed 

message: I've added the  tag because the article doesn't give sources that mention ther term "Ryukyu proper". Googling for "Ryūkyū proper" or "Ryukyu proper" revealed no sources other than Wikipedia mirrors.  Without a source, the term cannot be accurately defined. —Tokek 08:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also have not come across this term in any of my reading (I've been writing a series of papers on Ryukyu this year, and have read fairly extensively around the subject). However, as it does refer to a distinctly separate concept from Ryukyu Islands, Okinawa Prefecture, or Nansei Islands, what else are we to call them? LordAmeth 14:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "them"? Do you mean Ryūkyū Shotō? —Tokek 12:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. That works. LordAmeth 12:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's worth having an article of its own, I think either Ryūkyū Shotō or Geography of Okinawa Prefecture works. If it's not worth an independent article, I think it could redirect to Okinawa Prefecture#Geography. —Tokek 00:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
==== Support ====
# Support - NC on the AFD, so, while this article exists, we should name it properly.  Neier 07:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support - NC on the AFD, so, while this article exists, we should name it properly.  Neier 07:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support 

message: #Oppose per discussion below. I will fully support "Ryūkyū Islands", though. Bendono 14:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose
Talk:Temple Cloud

message: dialing code is incorrect - should be 01761 - this unsigned comment was left by 62.189.235.220 on 13th Oct 2006
Thanks - I've changed it but you could always edit the aarticle yourself. — Rod talk 12:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article has "The church is also the meeting place for the local St John Ambulance division, Clutton & Timsbury Combined Division."
Although I have found plenty of information about the SJA activities in the area, and the support given to the organization by the Parish Council,  I haven't been able to locate a source to support that claim so I have removed it. Of course, if somebody has a good source it should be added with the information.  Twistlethrop (talk) 10:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I can confirm that the church hall is the venue for a weekly meeting of St John Cadets (I have to drive my daughter there for the event - but not RS), but the only source I can find is These parish council minutes. I don't think it is significant enough to worry about its inclusion.— Rod talk 18:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info, Rod.Twistlethrop (talk) 21:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  St John's Ambulance using the church?
Talk:List of cities and towns in Trinidad and Tobago

message: We need a reliable source!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.213.15.154 (talk) 02:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is this information comming from? 

message: More than nine years ago, when I reformatted this page, I thought it might be nice to add name origins. The problem was it was unsourced at the time, and the problem has only gotten worse. While there are sources for some names, most of it is unverifiable. This should have been done years ago, but better late than never. Guettarda (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origins
Talk:Cuneiform (Unicode block)

message: I am trying to do this concordance in order to be able to generate Unicode fonts from legacy fonts that are organized by Borger number. However, the concordance as derived from Anderson's sign list seems to be wrong (unless Borger has completely overthrown his scheme in the 2003 edition): B001=ASH is ok. B002 = HAL = ASH.ASH is ok. But B003 = HAL seems mistaken, since already B002 = HAL, and B003 = MUG. B005 = BA, not BAL. BAL is actually B009, and encoded at 12044, not 12045. For this reason, the concordance should be considered broken, and should probably be redone manually (or maybe updated once cuneiformsigns.org is updated?) dab (ᛏ) 12:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: table now at list of cuneiform signs dab (ᛏ) 17:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concordance

message: it may be that some "missing signs" may still be mapped to unmatched codepoints.  Some unicode character names remain enigmatic. I have no idea what "121B6   CUNEIFORM SIGN KWU318" is supposed to be. Also, what are "12356   CUNEIFORM SIGN USHX", "12358   CUNEIFORM SIGN USHUMX", "12361   CUNEIFORM SIGN ZAMX"? dab (ᛏ) 16:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: table completed, to be cleaned up

message: (see external links)
Nidaba lead as it renders for me with the font installed
dab (𒁳) 15:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: uploaded Hittite font

message: I noticed the cuneiform fonts on this table won't display in my firefox 3.0 browser, however when the table entry is changed from unicode|xxxxxx to cuneiform|xxxxxx it displays fine.  I changed the entry for the first sign, if no one else has objections I suggest they all be changed.--Gurdjieff (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  more font headaches 

message: What has a user to do to see something else than a rectangle for each cuneiform in the long table? Sae1962 (talk) 08:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A sure way is clicking the external link (in the top of the table) to the Unicode chart (pdf). Regarding installing fonts &tc I don't know enough. -DePiep (talk) 19:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visibility of forms 

message: My Cuneiform BI x12049 looks much simpler Two lines lying one above another with different triangles on both sides, like the left half of AB. BI seems compound here. 
More like x1202b 𒀫 .--Room 608 (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BI 𒁉 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TKD

message: Username	TKD
Total edits	7271
Distinct pages edited	2564
Average edits/page	2.836
First edit	14:09, December 5, 2005
	
(main)	3432
Talk	875
User	164
User talk	940
Image	171
Image talk	7
Template	344
Template talk	67
Category	148
Category talk	17
Wikipedia	865
Wikipedia talk	223
Portal	18
TKD's edit count using Interiot's tool2 Glen 12:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats
Talk:EON FM

message: Who put the request up? It seems a bit sus to put it up with no explaination.
I've created a new complete article on Triple M Melbourne, and suggest merging this article into that. Please post your opinion within the next week, otherwise I will then change it to a Request to Merge.
Stu 12:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree entirely on the request being suspicious, particularly as this has already been done, and I have already put in a comment stressing this was not a small (e.g. university) station. I would personally just remove the delete tag without discussion, since no reasons have been provided for putting it up. I don't think it should be merged -- it was a separate station of notability. I would be interested to know whether there are smaller U.S. stations for which articles exist. EON is a very significant part of Melbourne's (and Australia's) history of radio. I would have thought bring more of the great material from the Melb Triple M artcile over to this one. I'm open to other views though. Holon 13:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I've removed the AfD tag. There was not even an AfD entry for the article, let alone specified reasons as per guidelines. Only one edit for the user. Cannot be taken seriously. Holon 00:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Deletion
Talk:Key of Solomon

message: This article was mangled on Aug 25 by edits from IP 69.231.162.179. The only edits from this IP address have been to remove sections from the article. Nothing has been added to this (or any other) article by edits from that IP.
Versions of this article prior Aug 25 contain good information on the contents of the Key. I've  reverted this article to re-include all the details; but copy over the addition made on Aug 29 by Fuzzypeg and the link to the Portugese version added on 20 October. Dr algorythm 21:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion on 21 Oct 2006 

message: I've reverted some large additions made to the article. Two sections had been added. The first, regarding Pseudo-Solomon, claimed that Solomon was probably a name adopted by a later magician in imitation of the biblical Solomon. No references were given for this theory, and it sounds unlikely to me. A simpler explanation would have been that whoever compiled these texts attributed them to Solomon to give the documents greater authority. Either way, such theories need to be attributed to a reputable author to appear in the article, otherwise they are considered original research.
The second paragraph was a very lengthy quote regarding the document's mythical history, taken from the introduction of the Key, which I have replaced with a much briefer summary of the story. Rather than include such lengthy quotes we should provide references to sources which our readers can follow if they're interested. Fuzzypeg★ 03:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reverted edits 

message: I am remvoing this section per WP:TRIVIA, WP:CRYSTAL (in the case of Dan Brown's upcoming book), WP:NOT, WP:FRINGE and a host of other policies and guidelines.  Blueboar (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "In polular culture" 

message: Spam and vandalism will be reverted hastily.  Please don't.Simonm223 (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please no Spamming 

message: I actually own this book, so I could pick out a few pages to reference through Google books if that would help in the "contents" section where more sources seem to be needed, I'm just not certain what is expected. Also, would a redirect from "King Solomon's Clavicle" to this page be out of order? Hit up my talk page if this sounds acceptable. Spetheric (talk) 07:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Sources? 

message: I'm sorry, I have a small problem with the use of "incorrectly attributed" without citation.  Incorrect is a quite definitive word thus the need for citation.  I'm not exactly arguing, but could anyone suggest a better way of stating that, or at least provide a citation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm008 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Falsely?"  There is no way a book that traces to the late middle ages was written by a bronze age king. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly attributed?
Talk:The Way the World Is

message: The text "short volume which was written in response to the surprise of a number of working scientists when Polkinghorne quit academic research" seems a little incongruous, since Polkinghorne started his theological training in 1979, yet the book was not published until 1992.  That's 13 years later - could be difficult to reconcile with "written in response".   Or have I missed something here? -- MightyWarrior 12:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found out the reason: 1992 is the date of the second edition; the first edition was published in 1983.  Corrected the article! -- MightyWarrior 13:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of writing
Talk:Naihati

message: Dear Mr. Sourav Bhattacharyya. Please refrain from adding your name to the bottom of the stubbed article even if you are the creator. I have not seen bylines in articles on wikipedia and even if there were bylines, I doubt they would be necessary for an article that is 4 lines long right now and can be expanded by other editors. While I appreciate your cotributions, I request that you make more of them instead of trying to splash your name across the article. Thanks. --Antorjal 13:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Someone edited the demographics section with false informations. It showed that the literacy rate as 98% in Naihati. I have reverted it back to the true value of 74.5% and have also tagged the reference that was already in the article. I have added this article to my watch list. I would request others also to remain vigilant. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaonghosh (talk • contribs) 05:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Naihati is very famous for the worship of Boro maa, A very large idol of Goddess kali. It is believed that it is one of the most holiest idols in West bengal. 
during the immersion of the tall idol, Thousands of People gather to push the idol to the ghat. The Boro maa puja committee is also known for its humanitarian work. They distribute food, fruits, blankets, cloths and other Essential commodities to the poor.
I think a the worship of Boro maa must be included in the Article Rayaanpogo21 (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boro maa
Talk:Going Hollywood

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Vinyl banner

message: My writing was vandalized by a self promoting site:  http://www.magic vinyl printing.com/  spaces included to avoid giving them the back link they were trying to steal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  68.226.107.160 (talk • contribs) 
:Linking to a commercial website is not appropriate as Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. A better approach would be to find a published source for the information, perhaps in an industry website such as the two that remain in the article, and link to it instead. Accurizer 14:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am the original author....
Talk:Triton Light

message: I moved the infoboxneeded tag here from the main article page.  I've also added the lighthouse infobox to the article, but had most of it is still empty, so I'm leaving the tag here in hopes of attracting a lighthouse keeper or two. ➥the Epopt 13:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah.  I see that the gods of tags insist on defacing the articles themselves.  Removed infoboxneeded tag.  We have an infobox and don't need a hideous tag. ➥the Epopt 00:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Samlaut Multiple Use Area

message: I have recently seen references to a "Samlaut National Park" and a "Samlaut Protected Area."  I presume these refer to this article "Samlaut Multiple Use Area."  There are a few possibilities:
#Other writers simply got the name wrong, and Samlaut is really called a "Multiple Use Area."
#Cambodia has changed the designation.
#One or both are really different properties.
I went ahead and created redirects here for now.  If someone finds out that #2 is correct, please rename the article if you are so motivated.  If #3 is correct, please feel free to change my redirects to stubs. — Eoghanacht talk 14:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked on the IUCN database, and found that it is listed there as a "Multiple Use Management Area."  Until I see some better data, I am hesitant to move the article to a new name, but I will add one more redirect. — Eoghanacht talk 16:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you've got the right name already. Technically it's a protected area (similar to a national park) but some kinds of development are allowed - I believe multiple use area is a designation with some handy technical loopholes for resource exploitation. That's what I believe (a couple of these multiple use areas have been designated recently) but I'd have to check the legislation to be positive. Cheers, Paxse 10:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate names
Talk:Florida Theatre

message: * what are the other 4 surviving theatres?  can we have list and or links? --Mdukas (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions and Comments

message: "Elvis Presley played two shows at the Florida Theatre to the dislikes of Jacksonville's city leadership" - Elvis talks about this in the movie Elvis on Tour. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elvis 
Talk:Strathclyde Country Park

message: I have removed the sentence on drug dealing.  If someone can provide a reference then feel free to put it back up.
Graemec2 13:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Drug Dealing
Talk:The Willows, Salford

message: According to the wigan.rlfans.com website, the 1912-1913 Lancashire Cup Final was played at Weaste, Salford, would this be the same ground as The Willows, Salford?. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Weaste]], [[Salford]] = [[The Willows, Salford]]?
Talk:PENIS

message: I believe this page could be useful as a redirect to Penis.  Keep it locked, though.  Peter O. (Talk) 13:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--WinHunter (talk) 14:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, just keep it zipped! Sinep gib groot (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Proton-enhanced nuclear induction spectroscopy ? Trotskyist (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's already dealt with by the "PENIS redirects here" hatnote. I tend to think that most people who type it in all-caps probably just have the Caps Lock key on, and aren't actually looking for the spectroscopy article, but I don't have any strong opinions about it. – RobinHood70 talk 22:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 18#PENIS.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:16, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 18#PENIS]]
Talk:Lincoln Burrows

message: Due to Fox's terms of use and source information, the previous promotional picture has been replaced by a cropped television screenshot. If you seek to replace it with a promotional image, please specify its original source and copyright information. -- Ladida 14:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image

message: Someone should write a brief summary of the episode that ended about 18 minutes ago, as it involves Lincoln being re-captured. 24.222.118.139 02:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Captured

message: In Season 1 he's got some tatoos on the sholders. In Season 4 his tatoos are different and later that season his tatoos are altered for a second time. This should be included in the article. --Batman tas (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tatoos
Talk:L. G. Havanur

message: How old was he when he died? Havanur.com mentions that he was born in 1925, where as The Hindu mentions that he was born in 1927. Supposing that information coming from professional journalists of The Hindu is more reliable than information coming from what seems to be more or less a fan site created by an anonymous admirer, I've edited the L.G. Havanur page to reflect the information given by The Hindu as Mr. Havanur's year of birth and age at the time of death. -- Vishruth
* I think we should take the Hindu DOB, as u said it will be in most cases reliable.--Ganesha1 17:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Abruzzi

message: Due to Fox's terms of use and source information, the previous promotional picture has been replaced by a cropped television screenshot. If you seek to replace it with a promotional image, please specify its original source and copyright information. -- Ladida 14:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem with that, but can we find one from Season 2 with shorter hair?--CyberGhostface 21:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we can make one from a later episode of Season 1. I am not opposing against an image from season 2 but I think screenshots from the Season 1 DVD are much sharper and nicer. Regards, Ladida 09:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image

message: Are you sure? "Abruzzi has also been known to have attempted to stop T-bag from having a sexual and violent interest in Scofield and Burrows." --62.147.192.175 19:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's removed. -- Ladida 23:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  season 1
Talk:German corvette Hiddensee

message: Hiddensee is not the world's only exhibited example of a Soviet-built missile corvette. There is a sister ship of the Hiddensee exhibited in Peenemünde's Maritime Museum in Germany.
:ACK, I visited it yesterday. Unfortunately, only the main deck is accessible, and not the upper deck including the bridge, or even the engines. -- 790 10:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is incredibly disappointing that this blatant copyright violation survived for 3 and a half years without it being redacted. I have removed all of the copyrighted text and replaced it with a basic sentence. Anyone can feel free to work on the article with any sources they might have. Parsecboy (talk) 21:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page would seem to be a nearly exact copy of the Battleship Cove page on the Hiddensee, located at http://www.battleshipcove.org/hiddensee-history.htm.  Is someone perhaps willing to re-write this page with original text, or alternately obtain the rights to use this material? Rwzehner 20:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is incredibly disappointing that this blatant copyright violation survived for 3 and a half years without it being redacted. I have removed all of the copyrighted text and replaced it with a basic sentence. Anyone can feel free to work on the article with any sources they might have. Parsecboy (talk) 21:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for German corvette Hiddensee. Latitude should be 41.7062, not 41.6062
—Eileenjeff (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that 41.6062 plops you down in the Weetamoo Woods, I suppose you're right ;) Parsecboy (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Taurus Sykes

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 14:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Haven't heard of him, google don't show up any major fights. Not holding any recognized titles and not a main contender of any of them. Should this guy even have a Wikipedia article? --Eqdoktor 18:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How notable is this guy?