lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Friday the 13th Part III

message: Who played Mrs. Voorhees, the ghost or whatever you call it?ChuckDizzle 19:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who played Mrs. Voorhees?

message: Due to the trivia of death scenes being cut, in my opinion, the plot summaries should be extended.
Explain to me why camp crystal lake can add links to his film page. Or interviews he's done yet our site isn't allowed to.
I only put the page link to our section on the movie. I don't care if it raises search engine listings. I assumed if camp crystal lake online can show their film page I could to. Or is there some sort of first come first serve BS?
Same with the interviews. I assumed a fan of Su Charno would like to read an interview with him. How sharing info can be considered spam.
:First, you pose a conflict of interest, because it appears you are the owner of the site and you are promoting it on Wikipedia. Second, did you conduct the interview, or is it an interview conducted by somone else that you have on your site? Was it an official interview or did you happen to meet them at an horror convention and just started talking tot them? Bignole 20:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you might want to try and ask the people over at Wikipedia talk:External links, because there are guidelines about external links. Bignole 22:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Plot Summaries! 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose - On the grounds that the ACTUAL FILM uses the roman numerals. Given that the film uses that title, it should be that title. Just because the poster uses a numerical "3" doesn't mean that should be how the title should be listed. The poster for The Texas Chain Saw Massacre actually says, "Chainsaw", yet the film itself puts a space between the words.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 16:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Friday the 13th (franchise)

message: The redirect Friday the 13th (2011 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ★Trekker (talk) 05:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Friday the 13th (2011 film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Friday the 13th Part 2 (2010) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ★Trekker (talk) 05:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Friday the 13th Part 2 (2010)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Friday the 13th (2015 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ★Trekker (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Friday the 13th (2015 film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Friday the 13th (2016 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ★Trekker (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Friday the 13th (2016 film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Friday the 13th (2017 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ★Trekker (talk) 05:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Friday the 13th (2017 film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ralph Randolph Gurley

message: User:Wetman: Thank you for creating this article. Could you please add more in-line references? In terms of tone, is it possible to recontextualize his "worldview" with more recent historiography please? Maybe Emma Lapsansky-Werner?Zigzig20s (talk) 22:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Parkwells: Are you familiar with Emma Lapsansky-Werner's work on Gurley please? I think this article needs to be recontextualized.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

text: Lapansky-Werner is an African-American historian at Haverford College. See this for example.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Have only had a chance to glance at this work, and Gurley is mentioned briefly in footnotes. I've incorporated a few facts but don't have time to pursue this now.Parkwells (talk) 17:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and tone
Talk:Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood

message: In one version of the F vs. J screenplay, the Manhattan murders were dismissed as the work of a copcat by the authorities. 
23:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: If it helps 

message: What ecactly happened to Tommy Jarvis after the end? Have one of the writers commented on it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackass2009 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened? 

message: I wonder why the sleeping bag scene in all its glory (the full 6 hits) was included in the theatrical version but not on any DVD.  Did the MPAA go back and force another cut before the home version?  -Deadman 12/17/09
It wasn't included in all theatrical prints. I saw the film in theaters and there was only one blow. -RiddlerJ 8/18/2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.140.233.17 (talk) 16:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the other 5 hits in the sleeping bag death? 

message: "David is stabbed with a kitchen knife, throws Robin out of the window, and decapitates Eddie with a machete."  Why does David Kill Robin and Eddie?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.90.196 (talk) 22:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained deaths 
Talk:Cornerback

message: The latter portion of this article sounds as if someone plagiarized it from a "How To... Guide" or "SI for Kids" magazine. Additionally, there are some second person slips and confusing terminology. This article also lacks resources, someone could have easily made it all up through original research or BS Shenanigans. 
* See WP:not, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, and WP:V --ShadowJester07 21:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: I added on a little bit of background.  Hope it helps.--Steve (talk) 02:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: The factual accuracy does not seem to be disputed. No one is protesting to making any changes to the article. If you think something is wrong, by all means, change it! 64.131.243.107 (talk) 00:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although, I have to say, this article DEFINITELY needs work. Ugh. 64.131.243.107 (talk) 00:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Accuracy 

message: Given the purpose of Wikipedia articles is generally to communicate knowledge to people who don't know anything (or a lot) about a particular subject, I think this article is a bit heavy on technical football terms that many people won't understand. There are also some odd pieces of writing - e.g. using capital letters for emphasis "they can cover ANY offensive receiver so effectively" - that aren't really encyclopedic. Overall it needs a cleanup from someone who really understands the subject (which rules me out as I know almost nothing about the sport). Lewdswap (talk) 11:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: This section of the article seems kind of duplicative of the man-to-man defense article. Should we merge the two? --MZMcBride (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Single/man-to-man coverage" section duplicative of [[man-to-man defense]] article?
Talk:Jacques Pépin

message: Can anyone confirm whether Pepin is Jewish, and whether this has influenced his cooking (or, perhaps more pertinently, his early life in Lyon during WWII?) --70.48.207.117 17:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: I think the recipe should go to wikicookbooks w/ a link. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.124.29.130 (talk) 08:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe? 

message: The article says: He eventually served as a personal chef for Charles de Gaulle and two other French premiers. Upon immigration to the United States in 1959, Pépin turned down a job offer at...
OK, He was born 1935, and immigrated in 1959 at age 24. So he cooked for THREE French premiers by age 24? Where are the references? Proxy User (talk) 05:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: not as prestigious as it sounds maybe
he mentions it in this interview and it is related to why he turned down the white house job in favor of Howard Johnson's
http://blogs.kqed.org/essentialpepin/jacques-pepin-bio/a-conversation-with-jacques-pepin-nyc-wine-food-festival/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.170.233 (talk) 05:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates and History

message: While I'm sure that Jacques was honored to cook for Obama's fund-raiser, it is not an honor.  That should either be moved someplace more appropriate or removed altogether - which is my vote, he's cooked thousands of meals and many for famous people.  What is the important point that's being conveyed here?
209.222.202.123 (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards and Honors 

message: Curious as to why Today's Gourmet (KQED, 1991-1993) isn't listed under his television work. 173.25.185.10 (talk) 03:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today's Gourmet (1991-1993)
Talk:Jared Sparks

message: Parents were Joseph Sparks and Eleanor Orcutt. His wife Crowninshield is of long New England pedigree and researched his family after his death. jmswtlk (talk) 00:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: Add, to the inset at least, "Spouse: None (or number)" and "Children: None (or names)."
Jimlue (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Spouse, children?
Talk:Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers

message: Trivia sections are utter pathetic rubbish, and have no place on wikipedia. Would you find them in an encyclopaedia? No! Exactly my point. So stop adding them. LuciferMorgan 20:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Relax, every page has a trivia section. Even movie encyclopedias have trivia sections. McDanger 08:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Trivia sections go against Wikipedia policy. Lots42 (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Sections - Stop Adding them Please!

message: Why is there an image of Myers from the 2007 Zombie remake? McDanger 08:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Image

message: I noticed that there was a lot of unresearched points in the Trivia section. I added the "" tag myself.
But unless someone finds a source and backs up these claims, I will have no hesitation in deleting them. Gay15boy 00:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unresearched 

message: "The Screen goes black when Jamie saying no while looking at the cell that Michael was in" Good English that....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.197.236 (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Poor
Talk:Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers

message: The 'Fan Reaction' section of this article mentions that the character of Dr Wynn returns from the first film. However, the first mention of Dr Wynn that I can see is in the 'Trivia' section of this article. He's not even mentioned in the plot synopsis!  I've never seenany of the films, but if anyone who has could amend the relevant articles, they'd all make a lot more sense. 145.8.174.134 10:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing references to previous films

message: I would suggest a hide/show option for the latter part of the article that tends to ramble on about the various cuts, edits, versions, etc that the casual wiki reader most likely gets lost in. I fully agree with the suggestions to merge those latter sections into one. 174.228.3.228 (talk) 07:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: In the trivia section, it says that you can only see Michael's eyes in one scene, however, in at least one other scene it seems you can see his eyes (when he kills Barry Simms). Has anybody else noticed this, because I don't want to delete that bit without other people to back this up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.174.50 (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael's Eyes 

message: I disagree with the assertion that the audience is never told who the father of Jamie's baby is. I've watched this film several times now, and I've always thought it made it pretty apparent that Michael himself was the father, not only at the time of her forced impregnation ("Don't hurt me, Michael"), but later in the film when confronted by Michael, someone, though I can't remember who at the moment (I'll have to re-watch the film as its been a while since I've seen it), makes a comment to the effect of "It's your baby, isn't it, Michael?"
      Now granted the version I've seen is the Director's Cut and not the theatrical release, so I'm unsure if those two scenes are in both versions (not an easy film to find, let alone twice), but it is still certainly noteworthy in my opinion.
      I'll comment further when I've had a chance to re-watch the movie (the next day or two). -HamatoKameko (talk) 20:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Father 
Talk:Halloween: Resurrection

message: it has alot of spelling and grammatical errors... what happened?Tim Tebow ROCKS!!!!!! (talk) 00:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  who wrote the summary 
Talk:Material witness

message: Perhaps this page should more properly be called "Material Witness Statute." If so, it could have a comprehensive history of the statute, including an account of the controversial post-9/11 uses of the statute. Then, "material witness" could just be a subheading.
Just updating stuff. I'll keep on adding as I have more time.
Aaa36 14:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material witness statute 

message: In every phrase defining a material witness, the word "material" is used without explaining what that word means in this context. That makes this entry pretty lame, IMHO. 71.255.167.169 (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "material"? 

message: Mr. al-Kidd, for all the horrible treatment he received, was confined for 16 days, and not 13 months, as the article says. In fact, he was released subject to certain conditions, and lived under these conditions for 13 months. However, his confinement last just over two weeks. I've made the change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.110.150 (talk) 05:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abdullah al-Kidd 

message: What limits on conditions and locations are there on the police when it comes to a material witness?  Such as - where can and can't the police hold a material witness?  Is (s)he kept as a prisoner and not allowed phone calls, visits, to do business, etc?  Are they kept in chains, "the hole," prison uniform, etc? --Bmoshier (talk) 12:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limits on Location of and Conditions for keeping a Material Witness
Talk:Ocado

message: Does anyone have any details as to the coverage offered by this service? They don't have a map on the website, but I've tried putting in various postcodes and the coverage seems quite limited, even in areas that I know have a Waitrose nearby. (Nothing in Durham, for example, which definitely has one.) 82.113.178.1 08:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article still lacks coverage information, but I don't know where we could get any from. A recent (November 2020) Guardian article () says "it doesn’t stretch farther north than Sunderland". But how extensive is the coverage south of Sunderland? --Zundark (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coverage 

message: Ocado Retail Limited was incorporated as PCO 225 LIMITED, a private company limited by shares, on 11 November 1999. On 31 January 2000, the company name changed to L.M. SOLUTIONS (UK) LIMITED. On 14 June 2014, the company name changed to OCADO RETAIL LIMITED. All the preceding obtained from Companies House. Humanity Dick (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is not a repository for information. If you think that changes should be made to the article, you should say what.16:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors

message: I'm holding a discussion at Talk:A Nightmare on Elm Street (franchise)#Cast in regards to the cast list for the film series as a whole (and the comics if need be).   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 02:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about cast 

message: I am just curious, was this an actual cameo? I couldn't tell if Zsa Zsa was in on the whole thing, of it was just a prerecorded interview and then when Freddy shows up to kill her if they just switched the normal Zsa Zsa interview for a stand-in . . . anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.46.14.198 (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zsa Zsa Gabor's Cameo?
Talk:A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master

message: I'm holding a discussion at Talk:A Nightmare on Elm Street (franchise)#Cast in regards to the cast list for the film series as a whole (and the comics if need be).   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 02:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about cast 

message: Why not have a section on the production like with the other film articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.164.37.128 (talk) 12:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the late reply, but we could add a production section if we find reliable sources. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: "Alice releases the tortured souls that Freddy imprisoned into the gates of good dreams (...)" -- Good dreams? Shouldn't it be called "afterlife" instead? -- Orthographicus (talk) 18:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Good dreams?
Talk:The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2

message: I really think this article could be expanded significantly and become much more comprehensive and interesting. If you go through Google to translate the Turkish version of this article, there is a lot of text to work with. I would do it myself, but have other articles to work on, however, if someone took the time to go through with a full translation, the article could become much better as there is a lot of information on the original Turkish article's page. David Rush (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the article 

message: The production section is too short, (it doesn't tell why the director decided to make a sequel. That should be added in there.--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Production expansion

message: This article is way too short with several sections underdeveloped (production and reception). These sections should have more information added to them. The reception section could use notable individuals reviews on the film.--Paleface Jack (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning

message: some or most of the plot is wrong.It fails to mention how officer hoyt got his uniform it seems to skip the first15minutes of the film.--Chaos2501 (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot 

message: This article is missing information on the film's production. This should be added to the article in order to capture the complete scope of the film.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is missing Production section 

message: Since I have been too busy lately working on different things at the moment I was wondering if someone with the exception of NinjaRobotPirate would be willing to give this article a long overdue rewrite and expand it. If anyone is willing to do that please let me know. Personally I'm tired of having to expand all articles that are in this type of condition by myself and most likely NinjaRobotPirate feels the same way.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There's this site, which credits production notes to "New Line Cinema", but I'm not sure if it's a reliable source. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 10:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite and Expansion
Talk:Bošnjani

message: Note what De Administrando Imperio, a work gathered in the middle of the 10th century by a Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Emperor says. It doesn't refer to who ruled there, but who inhabited. It states Bosnia (what is now Bosnia proper) as inhabited by Serbs in the first half of the 7th century. 
Additionally, the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja from the 1170s-1196 (12th century) written by a Roman Catholic Christian Archbishop of Bar, Serbia and Montenegro and Primate of Serbia writes that Bosnia is one of the two constituent entities (the other being Rascia) of Serbia. Although this is not an ethnic explaination like DAI and it only refers to rulership, it is noted that Bosnia is a root Serbian territory. 
Now, please note that Tvrtko, Dabiša, Ostoja, Ostojić, Tvrtko II, Tomaš, Tomašević or Jelena Gruba. All Kings of Serbs or Queens of Serbs; and they noted that in the first place. There were all examples of Bosnian monarchs to the end. Stepan II Kotromanić was proud of his Serbian mother Princess, as he noted in his charter. King Stefan Tomaš claimed when he implaced his son as Despot of Serbia on 1 April 1456 in Smederevo that he conducted that with the will of all Serbs from both Bosnia and Serbia. 
But the actual key event is Ban Matej Ninoslav (13th century) that openly refered to his people being none other than Serbs. 
Now Damir, how can you claim after this that the people of Medieval Bosnia didn't have at least a small Serbian feeling? --HolyRomanEmperor 15:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damir 

message: They called themselves Bosnjani because at that time they were under Bosnian kingdom. Before that they were Croats and Serbs, but afterwards they became Bosnjani because of different ruler, also they were most likely Bogomils, as most of historians agree. Being Serb, Bosniak or Croat in Middle Age is completely different than nowadays. People considered themselves as part of kingdom which ruled over them at that time. Most of them were Slavs anyway, the same people just different rulers and ideology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.239.19.94 (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bosnjani's were actually ethnic group at that time 

message: The Serb ethnonym was used for Bosnia in Early medieval sources; in the 10th-century De Administrando Imperio, and presumably in the 9th-century Royal Frankish Annals. It should be noted that in the Middle Ages the term Bošnjani was primarily a demonym. Matej Ninoslav indeed used the Serb ethnonym. Although Stjepan II used Bošnjani, he called the language Serbian, and the Serbian emperor "Rascian", as Stjepan II too ruled over Serbs, stressing that he was not subordinate Serbia.--Zoupan 19:59, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serb ethnonym