lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Doane Rock

message: What do these have to do with Doane Rock. Before the 'lush vegetation" the area was at the foot of a retreating glacier. The barrenness and run off must have be stunning.  The gratuitous remark about the Pilgrim's farming practices indicates a disdainful point of view (Pilgrims BAD, nature GOOD). The farming practices that the writer may refer to cannot be laid at the feet of the Pilgrims.  I will delete the last 2 sentences in a few weeks if no good reason pops up. Peace. ~Calixte  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calixte (talk • contribs) 17:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the last 2 sentences
Talk:List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 90

message: I am a lawyer and legal historian, and am updating this list in a table format with case name, Bluebook citation, link to the opinion at www.courtlistener.com; also opinions, lower court, and disposition of the case. I am also adding portraits and information about the justices who were members of the Supreme Court at the time. Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 19:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this article
Talk:Hoxnian Stage

message: shows that, if it was between 200-300 kyr ago, it was the-one-before-the-eemian at about 240 kyr. Which presumably has a "real" name, or at least an isotopic stage name William M. Connolley (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which was it? 

message: Dudley Miles, could you please explain why you removed the two sentences I added to the end of the History section? The first I can guess was because of the big quote. I didn't notice anything about the other.TLHami26 (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sentence was jargon which will mean nothing to non-expert readers. The second is wrong. You refer to a "glacian", which is not a word in English but presumably a typo for glaciation. More importantly, you are not correct that the Hoxnian correlates with the Elsterian glaciation, MIS 12. It was an interglacial and correlates with the Holstein interglacial, MIS 11, as the source you cite states. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the feedback. I will be more mindful while reading the source material and posting information.TLHami26 (talk) 22:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of contribution
Talk:Huronian glaciation

message: Was Huronian glaciation caused by the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed into plants? --Artman40 (talk) 11:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plants were not present at that time, see: Evolutionary history of plants. However photosynthesizing cyanobacteria could have played a role in the onset of the galciation. Wenkbrauwalbatros (talk) 13:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

text: And it is strange indeed that this short, stubby "article" chooses not to mention the cyanobacteria in its  paragraph on the causes of the glaciation.--97.120.35.87 (talk) 22:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Glaciation cause

message: Is there a known derivation for this term? Jim.henderson (talk) 00:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to a locale in South Africa.--97.120.35.87 (talk) 23:13, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makganyene 

message: This article claims this ice age is the oldest one, but then the accompanying chart shows the Pongola glaciation which occurs earlier. 198.91.146.14 (talk) 12:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It might still be true if the Pongolan is considered to be a local glaciation rather than a global temperature drop. If Vaalbaara was in a polar latitude at the time, it could have been entirely local. 2601:441:467F:9E00:F907:6112:FCDE:50 (talk) 19:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was worldwide. See ref 5. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest or not? 

message: Lo normalmente, la glaciación es uno de los periodo más frios de la historia. A causa de la glaciación Huroniana era desde 2400, la primera glaciación de el mundo, y esa glaciación es la más larga qué ha pasado. A cargo de aproximadamente 300 millones de años.
Desde hace 2400 años hasta hace 2100 años. 2806:1016:F:CC0:D0CF:A324:1690:5685 (talk) 02:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  La glaciación
Talk:Wicked Cyclone

message: The Cyclone is not the only wooden coaster with a restriction of 54".  The Colossos at Heide-Park has a restriction of 140 cm which is approximentally 55 inches.
The sentence, "More intense than Thunderbolt (Six Flags New England), it shakes and rattles much more, giving riders a more thrilling experience"  violates POV, I believe, and should be substantiated with a reference or removed from this article. robertjohnsonrj 20:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It rattles all right. I wouldn't call it "thrilling", per se. More like "ow." Timetrial3141592 01:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've located and linked to a 2008 review of the coaster, but I've been able to locate little about it after that date.Graham1973 (talk) 02:31, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if it ever shook/rattled more than Thunderbolt because I never went on Thunderbolt till last week; but I have a long history with the Cyclone, and I can say that it doesn't rattle nearly as much as it used to now that it has the steel track. However, I noticed that the paragraph that talks about the steel track is written in future tense. The steel track is in place now and the ride has been open for a few months. It appears to be very popular, giving an extremely smooth ride. (I realize all of this is "original research" but only wanted to point out that the intense/rattling statement, which was dubious before, is now outdated anyway.) 24.91.245.200 (talk) 15:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies
File talk:P-51 Busselton.jpg

message: This link shows an e-mail between User:Nick Dowling and the Australian War Memorial User:Nick Dowling/Australian War Memorial Email. The email sights that the AWM has no problem with the use of its images oon Wikipedia aslong as the AWM watermark is not removes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xoloz (talk • contribs) 15:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Parda Hai Parda (song)

message: Fair use claimed as it depicts Rishi Kapoor in his role as Akbar in Amar Akbar Anthony in Qawwali singer attire singing this song -- Samir   धर्म 13:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image in article
Talk:Demographics of Luxembourg

message: So why is this specified here and what would the reader get from this specification? Like what countries are not Luxembourg, in the EU or outside the EU? 
There is no country that isn´t either part of or not part of the EU.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDestroyer3 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  From other EU member states and from non-EU countries.
Talk:New York State Route 7B

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 15:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template
Talk:Chamber of Deputies (Luxembourg)

message: The total party vote numbers are completely wrong, not even 1 million in Luxembourg.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.195.82 (talk) 23:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote numbers
Talk:Ted Darling

message: Surely he wasn't born in 1984?60.44.255.146 11:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he wasn't. It appears to be vandalism and I removed it. JMyrleFuller 13:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: He can't be born in 1984! According to the article, Darling started calling the Sabres' games in 1970, so he wouldn't have been born back then had he been born in 1984.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbrainkt (talk • contribs) 04:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Talk:Cantons of Luxembourg

message: What is the purpose of Luxembourg having cantons if town and villages either work on the communal level or on the district level? Is there a historical reason to this? And is the concept of cantons taken from the Swiss cantons?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.143.96.47 (talk) 08:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't particularly well explained in the article.  For the most part, they are historical, although they still have legal meaning (legislation refers to 'the cantons of Diekirch and Vianden', etc to specify a particular geographic extent).  They're not based on Switzerland - where cantons are sovereign - but on Belgium and France, where cantons are constructs of central government and serve far fewer roles (in terms of role, they're almost identical to French cantons). Bastin 09:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference on this? It would be nice to integrate all this information in the article. I've quickly checked http://www.legilux.public.lu and you're right: when "canton(s)" is used in recent law texts (2011), it only refers to wide geographic areas i.e. areas that would consists of more than one commune (Gemeng).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.143.96.47 (talk) 11:28, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:Transport in Luxembourg

message: There is no mention of the bus network here. This article here says there is one. It and the trams are part of the bug mobility experiment the grand duchy began in 2020 with free fares on mist transit, hoping for a 50% increase in ridership. There is congestion on the roads, and it is hoped that the mobility experiment can shift people to walk more, bicycle more and ride bus and rail more. - - Prairieplant (talk) 18:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bus network
Talk:Avi Pazner

message: I believe the article should have time to expand since it's just a stub I made, but if an admin strongly disagrees with me you may delete it. Hello32020 13:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub status

message: hebrew speakers may find this page useful (assuming this is the same person). 14:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  additional info. 

message: This version is a copyright violation of . --ElComandanteChe (talk) 19:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 
Talk:Risë Stevens

message: It seems to me that the title of this article should be Risë Stevens (with the umlaut) and that the redirect should be from Rise Stevens (without the unlaut). ForDorothy 13:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umlaut 

message: I've read a story that during a broadcast performance of Carmen from the Met in the 1950s, Mario del Monaco (José) held her arm so tightly that she could be heard saying under her breath "You're breaking my arm".  And he did.  Apparently, the bone could be heard snapping in the broadcast.  Is this true?  --  JackofOz (talk) 06:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was Giuseppe di Stefano who broke her arm. It was a Met broadcast of Carmen on January 21, 1956. Her cry of "Put my arm down!" can clearly be heard on the tape of the broadcast.NewYork1956 (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, wrong guy.  But did he actually, literally, break her arm, or was that a bit of hyperbole?  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What happened is that Stevens had sprained her arm while playing tennis and then during the third act of the performance Di Stefano twisted the arm just enough that it (yes, literally) broke.NewYork1956 (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  --  JackofOz (talk) 19:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Julian rocks del Monaco anecdote

message: Can't tell if the pronunciation was supposed to be "REE-sa" or "RISS-a". — kwami (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always heard it said as if it were (more or less) "REE-za", with the emphasis on the first syllable. Ondewelle (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My parents named me for her and they always pronounced it REE-sa, as do I. Most opera buffs recognize this as her name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.133.217 (talk) 02:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:HMAS Fantome

message: Perhaps rather without discussion I've moved the article to HMS Fantome (1901).  It now meets the naming guidelines of Wikiships, since she was firstly, and for most of her life, an RN vessel.  The article has now also got an infobox, rather more detail and proper references. Happy to discuss.  Shem (talk) 16:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to HMS Fantome (1901)
Talk:Gëlle Fra

message: Wasn't this memorial destroyed during the occupation of Luxembourg by Nazi Germany? Or was it rebuilt after the war? Or am I being confused with another monument?
:The Gëlle Fra was indeed destroyed during the Nazi occupation (on 20 October 1940), but was reconstructed afterwards, being unveiled for a second time on 23 June 1985. Bastin 16:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Destroyed

message: Is the statue currently really at the International Exhibition in Shanghai?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.67.18.5 (talk) 13:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shanghai 
Talk:New York State Route 9N

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Congrats! —Rob (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK placing terms that redirect to the article in boldface is acceptable; if it isn't, it should be brought up on WT:USRD as this practice is in place on many state projects. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review
Talk:7th Academy Awards

message: It is suggested that the associated page 7th Academy Awards nominees and winners be merged into this one combining all information about the awards for this year on one page. Thanks for your comments. Markhh (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:The Popular Kids (The Fairly OddParents)

message: Where does it say Trixie is a saiyan, and who is Xezeyer?  And what does the first sentence in the last paragraph has to do with the second sentence?63.3.11.130 22:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Trixie? 
Talk:8th Academy Awards

message: It is suggested that the associated page 8th Academy Awards nominees and winners be merged into this one combining all information about the awards for this year on one page. Thanks for your comments. Markhh (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:RTL Group

message: Possible negative POV pushing at RTL Television and here.  Haven't reverted as I don't know the subject.--QuantumEngineer 13:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the inserted text. To be frank to me it seemed to be baseless rambling. RoToRa 11:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible NPOV violations-please check 

message: "Europe's largest TV, radio and production company" - really? Bigger than the BBC? I'd like to see sources for that. Andrew Oakley (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Largest is something which is capable of objective measurement, once you define what "largest" means (and I don't see that here). However, "leading" isn't. "Leading" in this context is a weasel word, and the whole article smells like an advert. --62.189.73.197 (talk) 11:32, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've slightly reworded (I'd be happy to see it re-described as #1 in Europe if there is a source for that), and removed the "advert" tag which IMO was a major exaggeration.  This is a large successful company and must have done many things well.  The article is a refreshing change from the typical niggly-to-hostile company article - see Johnson & Johnson for an egregious example Chrismorey (talk) 04:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe's largest TV, radio and production company? 

message: A product line that is non notable outside of its association with the parent company. content should be merged here. WP:PRODUCT -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: SpotX has several independent references, suggesting independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 14:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge SpotXchange 

message: I object to seeing banners such as "Parts of the article is an indiscriminate contents. (September 2015)". I don't know what it's trying to say, but it's not saying it in English. 
Start with "Parts of the article are" or "Part of the article is". Look up the verb 'to be' with google (not wikipedia, that's what got you into trouble in the first place). Once you've got that far, (Take your time, no rush), you would then need an adjective, such as 'red', 'slow', or indeed, "indiscriminate". There's no place here for a noun, such as 'contents'. Nor would 'batman' be useful, or 'London Bridge'.
Please could someone, who understands what the O/P meant, take it away and do something useful with it?
Same applies to the comment above. What is 'non notable'? 
(It appears that non notable is a Wikipedia expression. Its still lousy English. Try insignificant or maybe 'not noteworthy' instead). 82.134.197.202 (talk) 10:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Indiscriminate' was meant in the sense of the relevant Wikipedia policy: WP:INDISCRIMINATE. It seems that your concerns regarding grammar in the 'cleanup' template have been, at least in part,  Klbrain (talk) 22:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an English Site
Talk:4th Academy Awards

message: It is suggested that the associated page 4th Academy Awards nominees and winners be merged into this one combining all information about the awards for this year on one page as in most of the articles about other Academy Award years. Thanks for your comments. Markhh (talk) 20:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The article states:  Cimarron was the first Western to win Best Picture, and would remain the only one to do so for 59 years (until Dances with Wolves won in 1990). It received a then-record seven nominations, and was the first film to win more than two awards.  What does the section in bold mean?  Other films before this have won two awards, as far as I recall.  So, perhaps I am not understanding what this statement is trying to say?  Does anyone have any idea?  Thanks.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this statement mean?
Talk:Lewisham East (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The article on James Cleverly has been nominated for deletion. Timrollpickering 13:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note of article for deletion 
Talk:Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Luxembourgeois

message: In section "External links", link "Collection of Google Earth locations of CFL stations" does not allow anymore to get it for public person - ACESS DENIED even with valid login. silpol (talk) 15:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HMAS Flinders (GS 312)

message: A couple of not-so-reliable sources about what happened to Flinders after she was sold, apparently becoming the luxury yacht Plan B. (namely refit, civilian owner, refit 2, civilian owner 2). If anything more suitable can be found (or alternately, if any of the below count as reliable sources), should it be added to the article? -- saberwyn 05:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilian ownership
Talk:3rd Academy Awards

message: It is suggested that the associated page 3rd Academy Awards nominees and winners be merged into this one combining all information about the awards for this year on one page as in most of the articles about other Academy Award years. Thanks for your comments. Markhh (talk) 20:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:2nd Academy Awards

message: It is suggested that the associated page 2nd Academy Awards nominees and winners be merged into this one combining all information about the awards for this year on one page as in most of the articles about other Academy Award years. Thanks for your comments. Markhh (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The image top-rightmost is from The Jazz Singer (1927), and I believe it is not related to the 2nd Academy Awards. The Jazz Singer won an honorary award at the previous awards. Please confirm, and if correct, replace with a more appropriate image.
regards, MB  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.100.30.231 (talk) 03:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image is wrong
Talk:Arcelor Mittal

message: There is no "-" in the company name. See:
*Official website
*NYSE
*Euronext
*Google finance
*BBC News
*Financial Times
*Forbes
*MartinHagberg|MartinHagberg]] 15:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now moved the page from Arcelor-Mittal to Arcelor Mittal. / MartinHagberg 15:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move from "Arcelor-Mittal" to "Arcelor Mittal"  

message: When Arcelor Mittal launched their new brand identity, they started to write the company's name with CamelCase: ArcelorMittal. Should this article be moved to ArcelorMittal? MartinHagberg 12:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. There should be no space in the title. Languagehat (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move again? 

message: I think not - they are both equals, it's not as if one giant company absorbed a small one.  So you can't easily pull two full histories into 1 article.  82.211.87.61 10:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Let Arcelor and Mittal Steel Company on its place with its history. --Jklamo 17:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Same here. If we do this we might as well merge all companies that merge.Nejee16 02:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Disagree with merger I also agree. There is a tendency to merge all companies together; Arcelor and Arcelor Mittal have different histories. The articles should be linked, not merged together.--Scotchorama 12:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Absolutely not, as per above comments. Choalbaton (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

text: No to merge - overall effect is to create a current events page, with loss of historical information. (removing tags - clearly not going to happen_>83.100.251.196 (talk) 00:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Archelor and Mittal with ArchelorMittal