Talk:Antonio Gramsci

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antonio Gramsci. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926224337/http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?s=contents&issue=114 to http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?s=contents&issue=114
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: During the presentation of the first international catalogue of stamps, Archbishop Luigi De Magistris, prefect emeritus of the Apostolic Penitentiary, revealed this week that the founder of the Italian Communist Party, Antonio Gramsci, returned to the Catholic faith of his childhood and received the sacraments before dying in April of 1937. 2804:14D:78D3:4AD8:F881:4FB5:1696:D03A (talk) 17:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is disputed, and it's well known his last wish to be buried in the acatholic cemetery.--191.19.39.233 (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion to Christianity 

message: The passage cited for the sentence that claims Gramsci was a Left Communist reads as follows:
"It is likely that, had his true
views been known (particularly his growing hostility to Stalin), he would
have been expelled from the Party. Granted ‘provisional freedom’ on the
grounds of ill health, Gramsci was moved to a supervised clinic in Rome in
1935 where he died of a stroke in 1937. He is buried in the Protestant
Cemetery in Rome.
Gramsci’s prison sentence was effectively a death penalty. More and more
illnesses swarmed around his body, a situation made worse by the prison
authorities’ indifference. Compounding this agony, Gramsci’s contact with
his wife and children was irregular, not least because Giulia was susceptible
to long bouts of mental illness and proved unwilling to return to Italy. He
would never see his second son, Giuliano. A letter to Tatiana notes that being
cut off from his family ‘added a second prison to my life’. ‘I was prepared
for the blows of my adversaries’, he writes, ‘but not for the blows that would
also be dealt me from completely unsuspected corners’ (1979: 175). Yet
despite this, Gramsci’s brain did not cease functioning in 1928. It is a mark
of the contingent, developing nature of Italian fascism that unlike millions
of subsequent victims of totalitarianism, Gramsci was imprisoned, not
murdered. With the help of the Cambridge economist Piero Sraffa, he was
able to receive books and journals, and his sister-in-law Tatiana campaigned
ceaselessly for his release and for improvements in his condition, eventually
smuggling Gramsci’s writings from his room at the clinic. These took the
form of 33 notebooks, a total of nearly 3,000 pages of tiny, meticulous
handwriting.
These Prison Notebooks are a fragmentary, incomplete record of Gramsci’s
mental efforts over a decade, written under the watchful eye of the prison
censor, and reassembled years later by editors and translators. Yet despite the
conditions of their production and publication, what makes the Notebooks
among the most important and moving documents of the twentieth century
is precisely their immediacy, their sense of not being disinterested but
of transcending the confines of prison, of reaching beyond the failure of
socialism and the triumph of fascism, to understand a contemporary situation
and to remake it. Thus, the very different scraps of synthesis and analysis
in the Notebooks – about intellectuals, language and linguistics, about literature
and folklore, the Southern Question and the Risorgimento, about
‘Americanism’, ‘Fordism’ and most insistently hegemony – build towards a
major understanding of power and meaning in the countries of advanced
capitalism." (25, Jones, 2006)
So again, there is no citation provided for Gramsci being a left communist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.82.80.182 (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gramsci and Left Communism 

message: I am just now learning about Gramsci and would find it extremely helpful to have references in the Philosophy section to guide me in locating primary and, especially, secondary sources that support those entries. Jojalozzo (talk) 23:11, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in Philosophy section 

message: While Gramsci's writings cover a wide range of topics, I do not believe the description of him above is accurate. He could be accurately described as a "linguist", "historian", "philosopher", etc. if he had specialized in one of these fields, but occasionally writing on certain topics isn't enough to be classed with a specialist title like this. Hanshans23 (talk) 15:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: "philosopher, political theorist, linguist, sociologist, historian, writer, literary critic, journalist"

message: Why is this notable? Although Ben-Haim may be notable enough to have a Wikipedia article in Hebrew, I see nothing at that article - translated - to suggest Gramsci's influence on him is important to the reader of Gramsci's article. In fact, the supposed influence looks doubtful. I am deleting it. Taquito1 (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Avishai Benhaim