lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-11-17 Werner Erhard

message: indicated he/she would like to participate in the mediation. Arcana imperii Ascendo tuum (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure,  can either add emself here or, if you provide a diff for when ey said so, you can do so. However, please see my new mediator note above. — Sebastian 18:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New party 

message: Both David and I have tried for four days to move both parties towards a productive solution of the issue. I have privately communicated with each side, and I must sadly conclude that I failed. If my comediator agrees, I therefore motion to close this case. Both parties have the right to go to ArbCom, but I will not be able to attest goodwill for either party. — Sebastian 17:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where are the other parties anyway? I'm not considering myself as an actual involved party here, but Ftord and Saladdas (I think I spelled those wrong) don't seem to be active here? ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 21:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My thinking is that they're not participating, and a decision can be reached by default. Maybe Seb is referring to you. I have no idea. I hope you've gotten by e-mail, btw. You can respond in any manner you wish if you want to. E-mail or talk is fine, just wanted to see where you were at with what I sent. Arcana imperii Ascendo tuum (talk) 22:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mediation does require two parties with a difference of opinion. As the person who caused the dispute to occur through his OTRS duties, it would be logical that Swatjester takes the form of the "other party" to present the "conflicting view". Of course, mediation is voluntary, so if one main party doesn't wish to participate then mediation fails. Daniel 22:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess anyone reading this can understand how confused and nervous I am with this process. All I know is Seb wants out, and he let me know via this page and an e-mail sent. I have no other information. Don't know how this process works in this situation, still unsure. Please advise. Arcana imperii Ascendo tuum (talk) 22:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  See reply below. — Sebastian 01:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text:  Re: Where are the other parties anyway? I'm not considering myself as an actual involved party here...: Of course you are involved – see Daniel’s reply above. It doesn’t matter who the requestor puts in the form, but who is needed for an agreement. There is no point in bringing anybody else to the table as long as you are not willing to cooperate. I am not just saying that, but it is evidenced by your above statement, which everybody can read. What people can not see is that both Daniel and I implored you to let us know anything about the case, but you refused to give me any information other than what is publically available, and Daniel assured me that your "briefing" did not contain any specifics that would have allowed mediation. — Sebastian 01:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to close this case
Talk:Billy Wingrove

message: When I was reading the article, I noticed that it seemed to be written like an ad for Wingrove's skills. I'm not sure which tag to add, so I decided to add Wikify. My question is two-fold: was this the right template to add, and who/what can be done to fix this article? Elenseel (talk) 06:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: Wikimedia received an email from someone close to the subject stating that his birthdate is 7/12/87. (Presumably 12 December 1987). However, such an email does not constitute a Reliable Source. I did a cursory Google search and found two dates, neither of which match the email, and none of which qualified as Reliable Sources. Accordingly, I am removing the date, and request that it not be restored, or another date included unless accompanied by a Reliable Source.  --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 
Talk:Sandy Douglass

message: Would it be possible to include the following links?:
http://www.intcanoe.org/iclife/hist/gordon_douglas_ix.html
http://www.intcanoe.org/iclife/hist/gordon_douglas_x_xi.html
Dnewnham (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sixteen of the 18 citations are from Douglass's autobiography. Let's find some more diverse sources. HopsonRoad (talk) 03:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more diverse sources
Talk:Saint Endelienta

message: This has been adjudged potentially unreliable and if possible other sources should be found for the relevant statements. --Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Early British Kingdoms

message: The present spelling is Trentinney cf. http://www.trentinney.co.uk/ContactUs.aspx but perhaps the other spelling should be in the narrative.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 17:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I found both versions when I was working on this article, so either is probably ok. Also I notice Trentinney doesn't currently have an article. Perhaps someone who is familiar with the area could write one? TheRetroGuy (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trentinney
Talk:HMS Mars (1848)

message: I wonder if it is worth mentioning in the article that "the "Mars" boys" [sic], i.e. the trainees on the ship, were mentioned in the poem An Address to the New Tay Bridge by famous (or notorious) Dundee poet William McGonagall? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.200.135.95 (talk) 20:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference in Poetry
Talk:7th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 7th Infantry Regiment (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Inf/07th
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Operation Last Chance

message: The claim that Heim lived there with the help of ODESSA can't be verified because the existence of ODESSA during that time period is not proven.  The sentence needs to be rephrased or eliminated.
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new  request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.
 Hopefully this article has been updated to conform to the guidelines:
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. (May 2011)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2011)Gmw112252 (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A "Help me" template is only supposed to be used on the user's own talk page (per Template:Help me). Shearonink (talk) 23:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International Wine and Spirit Competition

message: Is the number of participants in each category, and the number of each class of award given out in each category told anywhere? That would be essential knowledge to be able to judge what an award actually means... Without such information, it just seems like a "pay the entry fee, and send the judges a couple of bottles for free, and if they manage to drink it, you will very likely be given a nice award you can use in marketing" kind of thing.
:Good point. I have added a second paragraph to the lead which summarises the possible awards. There is no limit to how many golds - it's not the Olympics! Edwardx (talk) 09:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many participants in each category, how many awards 

message: Hello,
I have noticed that there is a lot of information on this page that needs updating - it has an old logo, the judging process information isn't correct (e.g. there is no technical analysis anymore) and the 2020 president (Tamara Roberts from Ridgeview Wine Esate) is missing.
All the updated info can be found on the IWSC website:
https://www.iwsc.net/
https://www.iwsc.net/entry-zone/how-to-enter
https://www.iwsc.net/judges/judging-process
https://www.iwsc.net/about-us
Thanks,
Rachelswatman1993 (talk) 10:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information on page
Talk:Quantum Jump

message: What's the source for saying the song "Lone Ranger" was banned?  It was played on Top Of The Pops, and was a quite substantial hit, reaching number 5 - hardly a victim of BBC politics. In Vitrio (talk) 23:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it was put on the "restricted" list in 1976 when originally released. It was played on BBC when it was re-released in 1979 (presumably because the BBCs attitude to gay references/drugs had shifted, or they felt they couldn't ignore something that sold enough to get to No. 5, or no. 3 if you believe this link: http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=2174 !) Slothie (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: “The term "quantum jump" (later to be commonly referred to as "atomic electron transition") was coined by the Cambridge team. I preferred "jump"” - this quote surely only makes any sense if the first statement is that the term coined in Cambridge was “quantum leap”; however as  there is no link/ source it’s not possible to check if what was said was nonsense, or if the error has crept in in the transcription of it here. Jock123 (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This page - https://quantum-jump.band-findr.com/bandinfo - ha " ... The term quantum "jump" (later to be commonly referred to as "leap") was coined by the Cambridge team. I preferred "jump", as it had more of a "soul / funk" music connotation"." - which was how our page read until - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quantum_Jump&diff=587425064&oldid=586232491 - I will pipe the link back to the original wording. -- Beardo (talk) 23:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum Leap…? 

message: I doubt that the connection between Atomic electron transition and de:Elektronischer Übergang is all correct. Certainly de:Quantensprung which used to be the scientific term is nowerdays only used metaphoricaly and thus not equivalent to Quantum Jump which it is connected with. Still the latter is also used figuratively as explained in paradigm shift. This obviously has a broader meaning because it is connected to de:Paradigmenwechsel. This topic is posted on the talk pages of all linked articles. I recommended to discuss in one place: [[de:Diskussion:Quantensprung#Falsche Verbindung Deutsch><English wrong connection]]Ich zweifle, dass die Verbindung zwischen Atomic electron transition und de:Elektronischer Übergang ganz korrekt ist. Jedenfalls wird der ehemalige entsprechende Fachbegriff de:Quantensprung nur noch im übertragenen Sinne gebraucht und ist damit beim wissenschaftlichen Fachbegriff en:Quantum Jump falsch. Die Nutzung im übertragenen Sinn gibt es im English auch unter paradigm shift. Das hat wohl einen weiteren Bedeutungsraum und führt daher zum deutschen de:Paradigmenwechsel. Dieses Thema wird in den Diskussionen zu allen genannten Artikeln veröffentlicht. Ich empfehle die Beratung an einem Ort zu konzentrieren. [[de:Diskussion:Quantensprung#Falsche Verbindung Deutsch><English wrong connection]] Oeconormal (talk) 15:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   wrong connection English><Deutsch Falsche Verbindung
Talk:Environment in Australia

message: This hsould be merged with Environment of Australia, which I think is the better title.  We certainly don't need two articles on the same topic.--Grahamec (talk) 01:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been done.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Pathécolor

message: Wild in the Streets is 1968, done in Pathécolor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.4.83.207 (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Pathé+color+1968=Eastmancolor film processed by the Pathé film lab, not the old French Pathécolor stencil process. AVarchaeologist (talk) 16:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Terrell

message: Can we get a status update? Is he still alive? Working?173.58.53.212 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Google is your friend: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-terrell-2441a17?authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=-bgF 71.71.57.15 (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current info? 

message: Paul Terrell's association with the Apple I is well documented, but the "first personal computer retailer shop"? Terrell founded Byte Shop on December 8, 1975 as a dealer of the Altair 8800, defined here at Wikipedia as the first true "personal computer", but Dick Heiser's "The Computer Store" predated that by almost 5 months by opening on July 15, 1975.
:— Pippinitis (talk) 13:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the "first personal computer retailer shop"
Talk:Tumut Pond Dam

message: Article currently reads Water from the reservoir flows through the Tumut 1 and Tumut 2 power stations, and returns to the Tumut River further downstream. In fact there are four dams and four main power stations in sequence on the Tumut River:
* Tumut Pond Reservior delivers water to Tumut 1 Power Station, and receives it from both the river and the Snowy-Tumut Diversion.
* Tumut 2 Pondage delivers water to Tumut 2 Power Station.
* Talbingo Dam delivers water to Tumut 3 Power Station.
* Blowering Dam delivers water to Blowering Power Station.
All of this is documented elsewhere in our articles and/or at the SMA website:
* http://www.snowyhydro.com.au/levelTwo.asp?pageID=66&parentID=4 and its subpages.
In older publicity material, maps and schematics of the scheme show a Tumut 4 Power Station, fed by Tumut 4 Pondage, both of them logically enough between Tumut 3 and Blowering, and Tumut 3 is fed by "Tumut 3 Pondage", not Talbingo, which does not appear. Exactly how this corresponds to what was built I have never been able to find out.
Part of the problem is there is no overview of the scheme with a schematic anywhere in Wikipedia or elsewhere on the Web that I can find. Perhaps the money for publicity ran out and accurate representations of what was built simply do not exist, although there is still an active education program run by the SMA (now Snowy Hydro Limited). We should take steps to acquire or create some. Andrewa (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I made some tweaks and I think the text is good now. There is a good overview map here.--NortyNort  (Holla) 15:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading
Talk:Ronald L. Haeberle

message: The monetary pay-off ($20,000) has no reference.  I believe it may be mistakenly referring to the amount given to Lt. Calley for an interview with Esquire Magazine (Columbia Journalism Review, "Checkbook Journalism Revisited," Jan/Feb 2008 Essay).  If anyone can back up the amount given to Haeberle for his photographs, add the source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:There is no doubt he sold the pictures in 1969, for how much is another question. Green Cardamom (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: money

message: Haeberle had two cameras, a color personal camera, and a B&W military camera. The color photos he sold in 1969 to Life magazine. These pictures apparently did not belong to the US military ie. he took them on his own with his own camera and did not turn them over to the military. It's unclear if the color pictures are public domain, further supported by the fact Haeberle sold the pictures to Life magazine. Yet, we treat them as government property on Wikipedia. I suspect only the B&W images are free, the color images are probably copyright. Green Cardamom (talk) 04:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Guitar controller compatibility

message: Wow, Z-Man is watching this page like a hawk!  Twenty seconds after voting I have been deemed to not count and my vote removed...  Removing dissenting opinions from your own vote... this is why I love Wikipedia!  All rules are completely arbitrary based on who deems their own agendas need enforcing.  68.186.60.2 (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I would like to have this page reinstated. You could move the guitar incompatibility section of the rockband page here. It's factual information condensed in a nice table and there is obviously a big demand for this page. The voting outcome was 5/18 in favour of keeping the page, yet it was deleted!--Beau (talk) 14:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I say keep.  It should not have been deleted.  --207.135.146.151 (talk) 06:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  undo delete
Talk:Carleton Free Press

message: The writer of this entry was not partial to all the facts.
This article should be thoroughly reviewed or removed, as it illustrates an extremely one-sided argument and is vehemently anti-Irving Corporation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.198.71 (talk) 00:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Washington Christian Academy

message: Since this is a school page, some thought should possibly be put into protecting it because many students have and will come on here and vandalize it just for fun.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Um.nate (talk • contribs) 00:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection of this Page 

message: I would not say that the information removed is Irrelevant, it was about a close proximity school, and I would propose putting it back in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Um.nate (talk • contribs) 23:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant Information
Talk:Undifferenced arms

message: I think this article should be merged with Cadency; if undifference is defined more clearly on the Cadency article, this article could be deleted. Are there any admins or experienced wikipedians who can advise me on this?  Nomenphile (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I can't advise you as I'm not familiar with the subject, but putting  on the top of the article page (and placing a rationale on the article's talkpage) will draw attention to your proposal. Remember that silence equals consensus. NF24(radio me!Editor review) 02:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Superman vol. 2

message: The article states "Writer Jeph Loeb's run on the series introduced audiences to the post-Crisis incarnations of Bizarro and Krypto..."  This isn't true.  John Byrne's Man of Steel mini-series introduced the post-crisis Bizarro and the first post-crisis Krypto was Bibbo's dog he saved during the reign of the supermen which later went on to be Superboy's (Kon-El) dog in Hawaii in Superboy volume 3.129.139.1.68 (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I made the corresponding changes saying that this Bizarro incarnation was created by the Joker and removed Krypto completely.  I also removed the reference to Superman #164 which says Luthor became president (along with Lex 2000 #1) because we don't know he won until Lex 2000 (it's too close to call in #164) and Luthor announces his candidacy in Adventures #581 which was not written by Loeb so it's safe to say he helped with the storyline but he didn't introduced as the article previously stated. Bhall87Four Scoreand Seven 22:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not True
Talk:Siltcoos Lake

message: I'm going to track down the right Oregon-oriented group and see if I can get them to adopt this article, and hope it doesn't get deleted in the meantime.  Accounting4Taste:talk 01:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be fine--geographic features are almost always considered notable. I can see why the content-free initial offering was speedied, but its a fine stub now. And the WP:ORE tag and some other tools we use ensure that several people will be aware of its existence. Cheers! Katr67 (talk) 04:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
File talk:East-Hem 200bc.jpg

message: I created this map using sources found in Wikipedia, through Google searches, etc. Most of the sources I used are listed on the actual image page. I don't claim perfection regarding this map due to conflicting or missing source information. Any possible errors can be corrected. If you see a possible error, please email me at talessman@yis.us with your concerns. However, you MUST provide your source information or proof that the map is wrong! Just saying that the map is wrong, or that some borders are wrong, doesn't help correct the map. If you have concerns, list them on this page WITH your source information AND let me know EXACTLY how I can correct the possible error (which includes listing correct names for any spelling errors, and showing me a map with correct borders for any possible border errors). Without that information, there's nothing I can do to satisfy your concerns. Respectfully, Thomas Lessman (talk) 14:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map issues?

message: 200 BC Slavs have not existed. So word Venedae representing either autochtone nation of Central Europe or band of different autochtone clans.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:5991:2D00:B047:7010:3071:CEE0 (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venedae - misunderstanding the issue
Talk:Davis School District

message: They are watching us 2600:1700:2AA2:C230:D1FC:77FD:3EA9:5AF5 (talk) 00:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese government
Talk:City status in the United Kingdom

message: Why is this not a cathedral town? Turkeyphant 16:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Arundel Cathedral is Roman Catholic affiliated, not Church of England. The Equalizer (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arundel  

message: A discussion has begun on developing a writing guideline for how and when to record award of city status. You may wish to contribute at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements#What makes a city?. Contributions welcome. --08:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notification of discussion: how and when to record award of city status
Talk:Saharet

message: Here is a photo with no copyright restrictions if anyone wants to take the trouble to add it: Saharet (LOC) Rees11 (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Liang (realm)

message: The set of actual kings of Liang is equal to the set of kings listed at Wei's article (and thus should just redirect there). We could park this page at Price of Liang, but the title includes the kings; we could part it at Liangwang, but no one calls them that.
Mho, the best compromise is to return to the original idea for this page: treating the realm of Liang itself, with subsections on the various titles through the ages. — LlywelynII 10:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Chinese wikisource has the Shanhaijing. There's a passage that mentions a "Yinliang" being born to a lineage of Di Jun's but it's hard to make sense of since it's Literary Chinese. Anyone know if the rest of the story is an etiology for the province names? — LlywelynII 13:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mountain Dew Classic