lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vaalbara

message: Is there a connection with the Acasta Gneiss of the Slave craton? Vsmith 22:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Acasta Gneiss

message: How about a map John D. Croft 03:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement

message: This article is contradicted by Ur (continent) as being the first supercontinent. 76.66.202.139 (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I put a short sentence in the Ur article about the theory of Vaalbara being the first supercontinent. Bettymnz4 (talk) 21:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

text: It seems that neither Ur nor Vaalbara is 100% confirmed, so either or neither might have actually existed. 2601:441:467F:9E00:F907:6112:FCDE:50 (talk) 19:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  age 

message: Based on comments for my article "Rove region", to be moved to "Rove Formation", I need to do more work with citations especially.
I see in the comments for the special page intro, that a diagram of some sort is desired. I haven't found anything. Would a map of current-day South African Kaapvaal craton and/or of Western Australian Pilbara craton work? Bettymnz4 (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need to do more work on this. 

message: I will apply a for peer review. Bettymnz4 (talk) 20:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am finished. 

message: I removed the following off-topic content from the article. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supercontinent [in]formation 

message: Is it possible that Vaalbara looked like this?  
http://i.imgur.com/yGdP6rV.png  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4000:7A80:B544:171A:1107:8AE9 (talk) 22:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it possible? 

message: Why is Vaalbara called a supercontinent? It was smaller than Australia. 2601:441:467F:9E00:F907:6112:FCDE:50 (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @2601:441:467F:9E00:F907:6112:FCDE:50 A supercontinent is a landmass consisting of almost all the land on the world. There wasn't any other land on the world during that time, so it is a supercontinent. Wikifan153 (talk) 12:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Supercontinent"?
Talk:Control volume

message: *Moved here from Talk:Control Volume
I'm one of the authors of an article. But I'm not sure why it has to make "merge"?  And if any problem,tell me.^^--HydrogenSu 12:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Editing 

message: Of course, there should be a merge between Control Volume and  Control volume. CyrilleDunant 17:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; I'll do a quick merge.--Sadi Carnot 22:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The article looks at Control Volumes only from the perspective of Fluid Mechanics. What do you think about introducing the article with the general concept of "control volumes" and then exploring the different areas that use them, such as Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer (both conduction and convection), and even Circuits (e.g. Kirchoff's circuit law). Chrike 03:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than just for Fluid Mechanics 
Talk:Upper Thracian Plain

message: Upper Lowlands? That's quite the oxymoron. Surely Upper Thracian Plain(s) would be a better name? QuartierLatin1968  22:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Upper Lowlands is the most popular term used. It's not an oxymoron, it sounds exactly the same way in Bulgarian (the "low" meaning of "lowlands" is still there in "nizina", and gorno is exactly Upper). It's upper in the sense of being north of the Eastern and Western Thracian Lowlands, though it's not usually called the Northern Lowlands. But Northern Thrace is quite common. Todor→Bozhinov 20:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Err, actually, the "Upper Thracian Plain" thing looks more popular in Google. I'm moving the page. Todor→Bozhinov 20:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Trafalgar Castle School

message: Any list of alumnae must either link to an article about the person., and it's even better if a reference can be provided that documents that the person went to the school.  The list that was in this article was completely unlinked and unreferenced, therefore I removed it.  If the list was a work in the progress of being linked properly, then please refer back and re-add the names - but only if they are being listed according to Wikipedia notability standards.  PKT(alk) 22:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Famous alumnae"

message: I've reset this article's class rating to "start", because it needs significantly more referencing before it would qualify for a C-class rating.  PKT(alk) 20:11, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Liphistiidae

message: This version of the article was about the broad circumscription of the family, which then included Heptathelidae as the subfamily Heptathelinae. The World Spider Catalog now accepts two separate families, so I have attempted to rewrite the article accordingly, i.e. discussing only the narrow circumscription, equivalent to subfamily Liphistiinae in the broad circumscription.
One issue is that the family is then monogeneric, the sole genus being Liphistius. This would normally mean that the genus and family would be dealt with in the same article, as per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. However, because the broad circumscription is found in quite a bit of the literature, and was used by the World Spider Catalog until a few years ago, I think it's better to keep two articles, so that the taxonomy of the family can be discussed more fully – it's not relevant to the genus.
But I'm open to alternative views. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of Liphistiidae and Heptathelidae
Talk:Dwarf tarantula

message: Are the terms dwarf tarantula and family Mecicobothriidae synonymous? The current first sentence appears to indicate that only some of the genera or species in the family are properly dwarf tarantulas, but no further mention is made and Mecicobothriidae redirects here. If all members of the family are covered by this article, perhaps the first sentence could be changed to "Dwarf tarantulas, also known as sheet funnel-web spiders, are a type of spider comprising the family Mecicobothriidae." - Eldereft (cont.) 08:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:Nemesiidae

message: I know nothing about spider classification and so am not about to correct this seemingly bad link on a disambiguation page that I reached about a totally different matter. I wondered whether this Nemesiidae family is newly created, for the same page with the broken link Chaco (spider) has a valid link to a tarantula species Grammostola pulchripes, said to be commonly known as the Chaco golden knee, formerly known as Grammostola aureostriata and of the same suborder Mygalomorphae as this new Nemesiidae family. Chaco is a near desert region in South America, so I wouldn't be surprised if it had several types of unique spiders, but IMHO if Chaco (spider) isn't the golden-kneed tarantula shown, it needs to have a second word in its common name to distinguish them. And if they are the same, the Chaco golden knee page needs to be changed to address the new family or controversy.Jweaver28 (talk) 12:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  new spider family or incorrect link 
Talk:Expresso

message: "Expresso" is not correct in English or Italian and never has been.
I once asked a Barista what an Esspresso was, and she said "do you mean expresso?". Facepalm....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.49.110 (talk) 02:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Yworo" keeps incorrectly referring to "expresso" as a "misspelling" -- when it IS in fact how it is spelt in French! lol 193.109.199.35 (talk) 20:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We have consensus not to promote this misspelling (see Talk:Espresso). And you've been vandalizing both articles in exactly this way for several days. You aren't fooling anyone. Yworo (talk) 20:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't touched, much less "vandalized", any article. Ever. Who is "we", and what "consensus" are you talking about? Read the comments above. I just read the talk page at Talk:Espresso and see you've done the exactly the same thing there to Wikipedia. Promoting a falsehood for no apparent reason. Congrats. And please stop harassing me and accusing me of being a "sockpuppet" and a "vandal". Leave me alone. 193.109.199.35 (talk) 20:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, you pass the duck test. Give it up. Yworo (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes you think that I care about anything you have to say about ducks or expressos or socks or anything else? Leave me alone. 193.109.199.35 (talk) 20:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure thing. Just go away and quit your disruptive editing and personal attacks. Yworo (talk) 20:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Barychelidae

message: The article lede calls them brushed trapdoor spiders and the taxobox calls them brushed-footed trapdoor spiders. Although brushed trapdoor spider is used in some places, the most common name seems to be brush-footed trapdoor spiders.   Jts1882 | talk  14:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, my searches confirm this. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Actinopodidae

message: In the second sentence: "It includes the Australian genus Missulena, known as the mouse spiders, which are quite venomous."  
Saying they are "quite venomous" is not informative, since all spiders have venom and are therefore "venomous".  It would be more accurate to say this "This family includes the Australian genus Missulena, known as mouse spiders. Bites of Missulena spiders, though rare, are considered medically significant and potentially dangerous."   I also removed "the" before "mouse spiders" as it is unnecessary.  
I am new to Wiki Editing and do not yet feel comfortable editing the original article, so I'm just offering my suggestions this way for now. --The Spider Chick (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: please go ahead and make these sensible edits! Don't forget to put "Missulena" in italics by typing Missulena. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you so much for the feedback and encouragement to go ahead and complete the edit.  I know it was just one sentence, but it was a bit nerve-wracking nevertheless.  Many thanks. --The Spider Chick (talk) 06:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  the phrase "quite venomous" is not informative in this context 
Talk:Spitting spider

message: While the silk this spider "spits" evolved from venom glands, technically venom has to be injected to be called venom. Contact poison is poison, not venom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.209.12.155 (talk) 07:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Consolidated Edison

message: Why is there no mention under "Major accidents and incidents" of the destruction of the ConEd power substation underneath 7 World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. I mean this WAS a major incident in the company's history costing Billions of dollars to rebuild. YborCityJohn (talk) 04:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destruction of 7 World Trade Center Substation on 9/11/2001
Talk:Tree trunk spider

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 18, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-05-18. Any improvements or maintenance to this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If there are any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{#Invoke:String|replace|{{#Invoke:String|replace|Hersilia-2016-06-19-002.jpg|^%s*[Ff][Ii][Ll][Ee]%s*:%s*||plain=false}}|^%s*[Ii][Mm][Aa][Gg][Ee]%s*:%s*||plain=false}}]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Archaeidae

message: Some of the wording in this article seems to be from other articles on the web (in particular Nat Geo).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.194.152 (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "if you’re another spider, that is"
Talk:Jake Owen

message: I came back and added some more after the deletion tag, as I had planned to. The guy just released his first cd after having pretty good success with his first single. I heard it plenty of times on both my local country stations. Seems like he's one of the upcoming stars for country music.
* I removed the deletion tag as I am not the author of the article. It is stated at WP:Music that an artist can be considered significant if they have charted in a medium or large country. Jake Owen has done so. Mallanox 23:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Winged Victory (disambiguation)

message: I've removed reference to the sculpture in 30th Street Station (Philadelphia) because it's not victory; it's the archangel Michael. Mangoe 23:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pennsylvania Railroad War Memorial

message: thumb|Arch of Trajan (Benevento), with a pair
 Should we just make Winged Victory a disambiguation page? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we don't seem to have an article directly covering the main meaning, which has been common in art for over 2,000 years, and is not properly covered by a single misnamed statue, however famous. The best I can see so far is Victoria_(mythology)#Iconography) - btw Winged victories redirects there. Johnbod (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

text: That's a move of the disambiguation page to the base name, with either a regular or technical move request. There's currently a "main meaning" (primary topic), the particular statue. You can't retarget the base name here (WP:MALPLACED), and disambiguation pages aren't encyclopedic articles, so you can't put content like "In classical mythology the goddesses and personifications of victory were winged females, Victoria to the Romans and Nike to the Greeks. These are frequently depicted in art, often in pairs." -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't use a technical move request per previous consensus on the primary topic Talk:Winged Victory (novel)#Requested move. It'll need to be a regular move request. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentheses needed? 

message: * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Winged_Victory_(disambiguation)&diff=897361231&oldid=897345738 "NEVER called by the plain term - no OR please JHunter" 
* https://www.thelantern.com/2013/03/winged-victory-replica-statue-placed-in-thompson-library-100-year-history-with-ohio-state/ for it called by the plain term (i.e., not "NEVER")
* Winged Victory -- for the current primary topic, not OR, just used the redirect since you kept removing the primary topic from the lede contrary to the disambiguation guidelines
* WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL for general collaboration advice 
-- JHunterJ (talk) 15:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done finding some people in Ohio talking about a different statue! It was OR using a name that our article does not. Johnbod (talk) 15:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It was easy since it was a reference in the WP article. It was not OR using a redirect that our encyclopedia uses. It was inappropriate for you to keep adding article content to a disambiguation page while taking the primary topic out of the lede. -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistaken accusations of OR
Talk:Glutamate decarboxylase

message: I added content about the involvement of GAD67 in schizophrenia. Specifically, I added an explanation that may account for why GAD67 levels are lower in schizophrenics and how this molecular alteration may contribute to the working memory impairments often observed in patients.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgalvin2015 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Interesting theme, could be investigated and some info added in the article. (, ; also some media articles). CopperKettle 12:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAD transfer gene therapy for Parkinson's 

message: Added information about the regulation and synthesis of GAD65 and GAD67 to help show the differences between these two proteins and how differences in their regulation can highlight differences in their function.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbavley (talk • contribs) 19:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: GAD Regulation
Talk:Deinopidae

message: I thought it should say anterior eyes and not posterior, so I changed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.91.190 (talk) 21:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liquitex

message: Virtually all  this article has just been copied and pasted without permission from the liquitex website. 
: I made a brief summary of the history of Liquitex including the ownership. --Anneyh (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: The list of artist would need to be enlarged and confirmed by independent sources. As a start, I took the four out of five articles claimed by Liquitex and that already had a wiki page.
:An attempt was made to add an artist to your list, but sadly it was removed by another editor. I think if you look at your receipts for the past 20 years you will confirm that artist T.M. Ananny was a very good customer!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gladbot (talk • contribs) 22:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: For anyone interested, this editor is a sock for User:Ananny, a notorious spammer and self-promoter, long-banned by Wikipedia. She has wasted the time of dozens of editors and the whole sorry story can be read here: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ananny. freshacconci talk to me 00:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artists 
Talk:Chiroptera (anime)

message: This is CountessMorgana from the WRex and RandomCuriosity discussion boards. If nobody minds, I'd like to put in information about the Chiroptera from the OVA and subsequent works (pre-anime). The history given there has a superficial resemblance to the anime, but in the end the two are vastly different. -- 74.12.127.207 23:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great wealth of info but I'm a bit concenred that its a bit too technical for an encyclopedic entry. Separate articles might be needed down the road but I'm not gonna do any splits until somebody else raises this concern. I'm also going to add a spoiler tag. --Chicbicyclist 04:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I knew I was forgetting to add something, couldn't remember what... If there need to be edits to tone it down I'll be happy to work on that! Thank you Chicbicyclist! - 74.12.126.129 14:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Nope, Looky here --Lesserextent (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh okay, thanks for letting me know. --Eruhildo (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blood:TLV mythos

message: I'm not sure that it is made clear what exactly the difference is. Are they the same thing? Does the anime ever tell?74.140.118.84 05:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chiroptera/Chevalier 

message: Shouldn't the name of this article be "Chiroptera (Blood+)" since it is about something only found in Blood+? --Eruhildo 17:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Isn't the plural of chevalier just chevalier? I don't know French so I can't be certain, but I thought it is. --Eruhildo 00:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, Looky here --Lesserextent (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh okay, thanks for letting me know. --Eruhildo (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chevaliers spelling
Talk:Pape station

message: :"Pape station does not as yet have elevator service from the subway level to the surface, though there is a plan to complete the necessary work by the end of 2005."
Has there been any progress in this regard? Any update to this part of the article would clearly be an improvement. Radagast 23:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevator service?
Talk:Glenn Murray

message: Glenn Murray is out of contract and has rejected the last contract offer from Brighton so is currently a free agent.
77.103.162.9 (talk) 13:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Kinaro(talk) (contribs) 21:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 77.103.162.9, 21 May 2011 

message: Glenn Murray has signed for Crystal Palace FC on 22/05/2011
Wakodon999 (talk) 10:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Wakodon999, 22 May 2011 

message: Under external links - the current team is still listed as Brighton and Hove Albion FC. This should be changed to Crystal Palace FC.
Biscuit66 (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Biscuit66, 24 May 2011 

message: According to crystal palaces website, the league appearances have one more than soccerbase. As crystal palace are going to be more reliable, when editing and using soccerbase as the source, add 1. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soccerbase 
Talk:Dean (Christianity)

message: Very much agree with the merger - it's basically the same thing, except there are a few other religious uses of the term covered in Dean (religion). bd2412 T 23:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done. bd2412 T 23:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some material on this page was derived from the merger between Dean (religion) and Dean (church); the edit history of this material can be seen in the edit history of the latter article. bd2412 T 23:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: See Talk:Deanery#Proposed merge. for discussion. bd2412 T 20:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge. 

message: "Christianity" seems like an odd disambiguator.  The position is not part of Christianity, the religion - it's an office in various Christian churches or denominations.  I'm not sure what would be better, but the current title is kind of awkward. john k (talk) 18:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was previously at Dean (religion), although I do not know offhand of any other religion that uses this title for an office. bd2412 T 18:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I like Dean (religion) better, but it's still a bit off.  Basically, my problem with the current format is that while dean is an office that exists in Christian churches, it really has nothing to do with Christianity.  Most Christian groups do not have deans - it is mostly an Anglican thing, with a somewhat less prominent usage by Catholics.  Dean (ecclesiastical office) might be better, but strikes me as awkward.  john k (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Between Dean (religion) and Dean (ecclesiastical office), which do you think is better? bd2412 T 23:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a slight preference for the latter, but I'd like to gauge other opinions. john k (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll post a link here at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion. bd2412 T 17:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I cannot see what possible relevance this photograph has to the Article. A deacon is not a dean. And the Reformed Church in the Netherlands is not one of the churches which is mentioned in the article a having deans. Unless anyone can justify its presence, it should be removed. Ntmr (talk) 18:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Jacobus Johannes Graaf