Talk:Google Workspace

message: Would it be beneficial ting Google Apps internally? --Kushalt 15:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would a wonderful addition. GJ (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Either the heading of this section was meant to be poetic or it's vandalism! Qwertyfish11 (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Dog eat dog 59.164.104.147 (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither, it's a common expression in the English-speaking I.T. industry, deriving from "Dogfooding", meaning that a Tech Company is using their own produced software and/or hardware solutions for own internal use to prove and show that the company believes in their own products to be used internally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.79.168.158 (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eating dog food 

message: Lately I've noticed that Google Apps Standard Edition has changed wording to resemble that it is not for any kind of businesses anymore. E.g Standard edition page speaks of only groups and families, which is rather vague. It used to include "small businesses" but not anymore, I've been wondering is it anymore legal to register standard edition for "small businesses", like hair salong etc. Also this page says explicitely in standard edition link that "Not a business? Explore Standard Edition", I'd definitely like to know if Standard Edition is not anymore allowed for (small) businesses. Ciantic (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard Edition excludes businesses? (License changes) 

message: Google Wave development has been discontinued. It will disappear as it is integrated into other Google technologies.
Citation: http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2010/08/google-wave-to-be-discontinued.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.208.80 (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Wave 

message: Is it me or has this edition been discontinued?Jasper Deng (talk) 02:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Edition 

message: :::... except for this paragraph! (13 August 2013): The first list has vague and incomplete correspondence to some of the previous editions that were discontinued in 2011 and 2012. The two lists should be approximately the other way round (see following subsection for details).
The following are [were] real Google Apps editions [prior to December 2012]:
*Google Apps Standard Edition
*Google Apps ISP Edition  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.160.240.90 (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This section was incorrect and is now out-of-date 

message: http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/features.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.161.240.201 (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought that too, but it is free if you look a little further, apparently there's something like "google apps classin/non-evil", "google apps for education", and the $5/user month thing. The first two are still free. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 02:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No free plans 

message: Until I set this up, I was unclear exactly what it was. I thought it might be some kind of app framework like Android, competitive with something like SharePoint, but it's basically nothing more than their apps like docs, gmail and calender bundled with their core line of biz, rip on DNS . This and that it is a competitor to Exchange and what kind of market segment is likely to buy into it should be able to be properly phrased, sourced. The comparison article in the See Also does this for those who go there and appraise but some sort of summary statement ought to be in the lede here. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The big picture 

message: "In the UK, it is not possible to obtain information relating to Google and RIPA requests[38] but we know"
Who is we? Please use first person, plural or otherwise only in a quote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.177.37 (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  We? 

message: I think the References section needs an overhaul.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.240.172.87 (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cade Metz seems to have written a lot of articles, according to the References section. 

message: * from the Spanish WP, but Cfr.: Here? Which is the info'bout? I don't find it! 
The subject is about two:
#. dec'12 (XII'12) Google kills off free Google Apps offering
#. june 2013: version for one user: discontinued by Google (es:). At the end of the Spanish section (at those dates), history (historia).
* 7 de diciembre de 2012 - Google discontinúa la versión gratuita de Google Apps.38 Aún está disponible una versión gratuita de un solo usuario para los desarrolladores de Google App Engine a través de un proceso de inscripción especial.39
* Junio de 2013 - Google discontinúa la versión de Google Apps para un solo usuario.[cita requerida]
=== 38 & 39: ref.: ===
* ↑ «Google kills off free Google Apps offering». ZDNet. 7 de diciembre de 2012.
* ↑ «Use Google App Engine to Get Google Apps for Your Domain for Free». 11 de diciembre de 2012. Consultado el 23 de febrero de 2013.
=== May be a help (above) ===
* #What's an edition, and what's not
** #This section was incorrect and is now out-of-date
** #These are the available editions on 13 August 2013
=== conclusion (my question) ===
Although many words, above. I say that I am not an expert about products & Google's sw. But I saw (es:) that the product I was looking for was discontinues & previously dissapered the freeware (free sw). Then I came here lokking for the same info. It's the reason I'm writing here. Thanks. 
<BR>--PLA y Grande Covián (talk) 07:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm looking for this info, here. & I don't found it either 

message: Although many words, above. I say that I am not an expert about products & Google's sw. But I saw (es:) that the product I was looking for was discontinues & previously dissapered the freeware (free sw). Then I came here lokking for the same info. It's the reason I'm writing here. Thanks. 
<BR>--PLA y Grande Covián (talk) 07:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  conclusion (my question) 

message: Hello. I was going to expand Google for Work with third-party references, but I keep finding references about Google Apps for Work instead. Is Google Apps for Work a product of Google for Work? If that is the case, shouldn't this article be merged with the "parent" Google for Work article?Zigzig20s (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between [[Google for Work]] and Google Apps for Work? 

message: Hi everybody! This is a note to say that I have copied some information from this article into Google Drive. This is a post for proper attribution. Have a nice day! :) LocalNet (talk) 17:36, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying within Wikipedia 

message: I think something should be said about the limitations of GSuite, including that it is not fully compatible with Google Assistant features, and also the fact that legacy Google Apps for Your Domain users (and other previously available free tiers) are often excluded from new features and services such as Google One. zzyss (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy support (or lack of support) 

message: Hi, in the past few months Google has started enforcing parts of its Workspace Enterprise terms that have technically always limited all Workspace Business and Enterprise plans to 5 TB of storage per paid user added to the account. You can see the updated overview of plans here which only distinguishes Business Plus and Enterprise by adding that Enterprise have the "ability to request more" storage. I don't believe there's a support article clarifying exactly how the new storage limitations work. Many support representatives still seem confused, but after speaking with a few over the past few weeks it's clear that unlimited storage is no longer available and once the specifics are certain that information should be updated.
From my talks with support reps here's what I've been told.
* Enterprise accounts now require 5 users per before you can request more storage.
* Extra space is provided in 25 TB allotments. It may go higher with more users on the account, but I'm not sure and didn't think to ask.
* You can only request more storage every 90 days, but requests are not guaranteed, and if denied it still triggers the 90 day cool down.
* If the account drops below 5 users, you of course lose 5 TB per use removed, but also all of the extra storage requested. Thus starting the process of requesting more space every 90 days over again.
I suppose it could still be argued that with enough time and enough requests for more data while maintaining 5 users on the Workspace account, you could get a seemingly unlimited amount of storage. But before these changes, when apps asked the API how much storage you had left, it actually returned "unlimited". Now it returns a value relative to the users you pay for and the requests approved. Ramma314 (talk) 08:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlimited storage no longer available