lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Poa pratensis

message: The photo on this page does not show Smooth meadow Grass/Kentucky Blue grass19:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: According to the United States Dept. of Agriculture, Poa pratensis or Kentucky bluegrass is both native to the US and also introduced  [] .  Various subspecies are purely native:  P.p. subsp. alpigena, P.p. subsp. colpodea and P.p. subsp. pratensis.  P.p. subsp. irrigata is an introduced subspecies.  From this, it appears that either there are subspecies that developed in the US after the introduction of the Old World plant or the plant existed in North America as well as the Old World.  Since Poa pratensis is identified as both native and introduced, the latter conclusion does seem to be suggested.  In this case, the first paragraph of this article should be amended to indicate that P. pratensis is also native to North America.  In any case, Poa pratensis should be at least co-extensively identified as Kentucky bluegrass.  Does anyone have information about this?  NaySay 18:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native to North America 

message: Should there should be a section here about how bluegrass relates to house lawns, as it is one of the most common cultivars.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.48.6.139 (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawns 

message: For the life of me I cannot find a picture of the allegedly blue flower heads. Can someone please add a picture? 84.109.179.187 (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue 
Talk:Pilgrim Soul

message: I marked this as a stub, although I forgot to log in first. This is the rev.
The quote that is the great bulk of the article is from Feeder's site, which does not explicitly release its content under a GFDL-compatible license. Does this mean it needs to be removed? I'll go read the policies.
Aryaniae (talk) 11:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the quote from Feeder's site be removed? 
Talk:John Goodsall

message: Hi John, and thanks for the work on your own article.  
Information should be tied to a Reliable Source WP:RS, but certainly on musician articles this can be very hard to do.  You cannot prevent people from adding edits that they think are correct (and cannot prevent vandalism), but you can monitor the article regularly and correct incorrect information when it pops up.  Tying items to citations often prevents well-meaning editors from changing things based on less-reliable sources such as liner notes on CDs.
Thanks for your contribution to the wiki, and for the fine music you've been part of.   Ratagonia (talk) 16:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  (I have added more info about myself.How can I stop people adding incorrect info? Thanks <redacted>) 

message: Segment is pretty much unreadable.  And as informative as a grocery list. 208.125.68.34 (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance history
Talk:Process Safety Management (OSHA regulation)

message: Yes, there is the regulation as described in this article, and yes, the article is a fair description of the regulation, but the term "Process Safety Management" can also be applied to managemnt of chemical process risks other than the requirements in the referenced regulation.  
There is also a bit of nomenclature problems here, as Process Safety Management" is also referenced as "Chemical Process Safety Managment".  See[]
I'd suggest that 'Process Safety Management" be defined as BOTH the regulation and the technical and management systems as per outlined in by reference above....
----
I Agree with above - this entry only makes sense from a US perspective.  198.28.69.5 21:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have retitled the page and in parallel created Process safety management. That page is still a stub though. --JudeFawley (talk) 02:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete - Process Safety Management is more than the regulation quoted 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Guidelines_for_Risk_Based_Process_Safety/0PLDxXJ5RtUC?hl=en. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   – Isochrone (T) 13:04, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Marshall Savage

message: The quotation on this page needs formatting, if it is to remain.  Indeed, it may not be very relevant to the "Marshall Savage" entry, and might instead be included in the article on his books.
:The quote IS irrelevant to a discussion of the person behind the book.  Instead, maybe a quote from the book about why he wrote it would be more appropriate.  I'd also love to know whatever happened to him.  I can't find any trace of him online since maybe 2001 at best.Strumphs (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graduate Texts in Mathematics

message: Goodbye my friend. GTM, you were useful to me, but I guess your time has come. The experts of Encyclopedia-ism are demanding to see your papers of notability. Can such a thing exist, for you just a list of books. So farewell and I will remember you after your electrons have been flushed down into the nothingness of deleted wikipedia articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.157.50 (talk) 15:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This puzzling comment appears to have been in response to , causing the editor to think the article was in eminent danger of being deleted. Jason Quinn (talk) 04:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Farewell

message: Some titles are italicized and others are not. What is the criterion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acepectif (talk • contribs) 20:11, 12 October 2006
:Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles). Happy editing Btyner (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Italics

message: I think that entry number 38 is incorrect. This link says that book 38 is Geometric Methods and Applications by Gallier and Jean. Bender2k14 (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's book 38 in the Texts in Applied Mathematics series, not the Graduate Texts in Mathematics series. (And it's Jean Gallier, not Gallier and Jean.) --Zundark (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Book 38
Talk:Rotating-wave approximation

message: Please pick a link and add it...
In physics:
* Hamiltonian system
* Hamiltonian mechanics in classical mechanics
* Hamilton's Equations
* Hamilton's principle
* Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation
* Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)
* Molecular Hamiltonian
* Hamiltonian constraint
* Hamiltonian fluid mechanics
* Hamiltonian lattice gauge theory
* Hamiltonian vector field
Also, magnetic resonancve points to a disambig -- pick whichever one is correct. •Jim62sch• 12:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this the same as the secular approximation in open quantum systems? If so, it should be indicated somewhere. --MaoGo (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No they are different.  I have added this sentence and cited Mäkelä and Möttönen: "The rotating wave approximation is closely related to, but different from, the secular approximation." Jess_Riedel (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secular approximation
Talk:Nichinichi kore kōnichi

message: The aforementioned external link  links to not only a scroll with the phrase written, but is also a store which make the scroll available to purchase.  Shouldn't we find an image of the scroll not in the context of a scroll? The specific issue I have is that this in a way grants advertising arbitrarily since I don't think this is the only site where such a scroll is available. Prof. Pangloss 17:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we find another external link? 

message: Hi I'm new to this and added some details to the page. I also tried to add it to the Buddhism portal or the series but couldn't figure out how to do it.  Anybody thinks this would be useful? just for it not to be so isolated from the rest...--Moira perez (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhism portal / Series
Talk:Richard Brandt

message: A tag has been placed on :Richard Brandt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable.  If you can indicate why Richard Brandt is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Richard Brandt. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.
Richard Brant is an significant figure in the second main version of utilitarianism, Rule_Utilitarianism, referr to   Martin, M.W. & Schinzinger1996, Ethics in Engineering 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill USA. Page54 for his section of work. I havn't got the time at this moment to research into more details on him. NeoDeGenero 20:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:United States Court of Claims

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
* Neutral.  I proposed this move because JohnnE demonstrated that “United States Court of Claims” was the  official name of this court for some of its history, so there is a definite case to be made for the move.  There is also a definite case to be made against the move since it appears to have been more commonly known as simply the “Court of Claims”.  (For example, the Federal Judicial Center refers to it exclusively as the “Court of Claims”, and they refer to just about every other federal tribunal with the “United States” prefix.)  I would like to get feedback as to which name would be more appropriate. — DLJessup (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I just made a comment at United States Court of Federal Claims and wanted to copy it here to ensure all interested editors can see. 
This is not (yet) a formal merger proposal, but it seems to me that pretty much the entire History section of this article as it relates to anything before 1982 ought to be moved into the article for United States Court of Claims, to the extent it isn't there already. Then this article could briefly explain how this court descended from that court, and direct the reader to the other article for coverage of that period. It does not make a lot of sense to me to have the 1855-1982 history of this court both here and there, where inconsistencies can arise -- and, in fact, the articles are not identical, despite covering the exact same institution for the exact same period. 
Before I take the time to do it, though, I wanted to put a note here to see if there is any disagreement, or if someone else would like to make the edit, since I'm not sure when I would get to it. Thanks. --EightYearBreak (talk)  18:23, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merger of the History section from [[United States Court of Federal Claims]]
Talk:Russell & Bromley

message: Russell & Bromley LTD also bought out the Mondaine and F.Pinet (47/48 New Bond street) group. Anyone have any information on this to add to the article. I think it happend in the 60's or 70's.
SWM
--
Remove the opinion part in the children fitting section.
LA
---
In 1948 Russell & Bromley took over the English branch of the international firm of Lederer, famous for their leather handbags.
---  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.82.182 (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Erling Steinvegg

message: The link marked "iron test" in the text brings up "Trial by ordeal", but the iron test is not defined among the ordeals listed in that article.  There are several such references in articles on Kings of Norway during the civil war period (apparently it was a common test at that time and place) - perhaps a historian of the period can add the iron test to the Trial by Ordeal article...
:The ordeal in question is, in fact, in the article on trial by ordeal, but it is referred to as "ordeal by fire". The examples listed under ordeal by fire refer to, among other things, walking on red-hot ploughshares or carrying red-hot irons - exactly as they did in old Norse iron tests. --Barend 14:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kentucky Supreme Court

message: Terms end in January after November elections, so I changed the term end dates to reflect this.  Mary Noble was elected to complete the final two years of an unexpired term, and not to a full term in November, 2006, and thus she is up for election again in 2008. (76.21.211.219 15:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Drafts for the following missing articles for Kentucky Supreme Court justices have been initiated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices#Kentucky :
::Draft:Charles M. Leibson - Charles M. Leibson
::Draft:James B. Stephenson - James B. Stephenson
#Draft:John D. White (judge) - John D. White (judge)
#Draft:John Jay O'Hara - John Jay O'Hara
#Draft:Martin E. Johnstone - Martin E. Johnstone
:: Draft:Marvin J. Sternberg - Marvin J. Sternberg
Any help getting these articles finished and moved to mainspace would be appreciated. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Kentucky Supreme Court justices
Talk:Tropical Storm Peter (2003)

message: Nice work.Thanks for solving importance.I'll leave at Start-class for now.HurricaneCraze32 aka Mitchazenia 21:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's needed for B? Hurricanehink (talk) 02:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:Betdaq

message: Hello,
My name is Ruairi Fitzpatrick- online manager for BETDAQ.
The purpose of my user account on Wikipedia (Rooster866) is to update the article that is listed for our company (BETDAQ). I am clearing displaying my conflict of interest as I don't want this to be a stumbling block in progressing updates that are necessary for this page. My goal is only to help provide a more up to date and accurate description of the business. These changes are purposefully written to maintain a neutral point view and in no way are meant to be promotional. 
Please contact me to discuss (rfitzpatrick@betdaq.com) as I would prefer if a Wiki admin would get involved to help review the changes & make the physical updates to the page. This way we can also ensure that the updates are not biased. I have constructed an article in a Word document which I would be happy to share.
Thanks
--Rooster866 (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to BETDAQ listing 
Talk:Alan Jackson (EastEnders)

message: When was it mentione dthat he moved there?? Brianwazere 22:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to , Sonia said Alan lived in Forest Hill in Lewisham. I don't know when that might have been, but it's clear that he no longer lives with Carol, at least. However, Balham would be his last known home if we can't verify his move. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why no mention of his return for Billys funeral soon? 86.25.251.10 (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there have been no reports that this is going to happen. AnemoneProjectors 19:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And now there is one. AnemoneProjectors 23:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Home

message: for 2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.3.102 (talk) 23:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure it's worth replacing the picture for a minor guest appearance when he was in the show for four years in the 1990s. It would be pretty unrepresentitive. AnemoneProjectors 23:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I do, lol! But I will arrange it like Kat's/Bianca's? --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 19:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe add a new image, yeah. But which one should go in the infobox? I think the existing one as it's his main appearance in the show. AnemoneProjectors 20:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture? 

message: Everybody, please can you not change his status from regular to guest, as we don't downgrade status, Thanks! :) --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 19:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes boss lol AnemoneProjectors 20:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't mean to sound that way! lol --GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 20:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops I didn't mean to delete your apostrophe! lol and I know what you meant, I was joking :) AnemoneProjectors 20:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

text: You changed it to "previous" but he has two episodes left yet. We shouldn't change him to "guest" because it misrepresents his original run in the show. AnemoneProjectors 10:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Guest

message: Perhaps someone could explain why the latter is correct and the former is not, because all I see in the history is what seems to be an attempt to narrow the category and then unexplained reversions. Stephenb (Talk) 10:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Black English people vs Fictional Black British people
Talk:Angie Watts

message: Dobson on surviving life after soap   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gungadin (talk • contribs) 23:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This source is already in the article (ref name "glad") but I'm posting it here as there are some things about Dobson's actual resignation that I haven't added. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  source 
Talk:Berhale (woreda)

message: The Walta Information Center recently carried an announcement concerning Tiyarabora, listing 14 million birr of new construction in the town & stating that its population was about 5,000. However, the Central Statistical Agency has no information on their website about this town; population estimates in the article do not include the Walta information at this time. -- llywrch 20:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiyarabora 
Talk:August Wilhelm von Hofmann

message: I wonder if Hofmann named Formaldehydes after Pope Formosus. The mere thought makes burst into laughter and then I feel bad about it.
Korosuke (talk) 07:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No: the word "formaldehyde" was coined because this substance is the ALDEHYDE of FORMic acid.  "Aldehyde" was named by Liebig because it was created by taking ALcohol and DEHYDrating it.  So "aldehyde" in Liebig's and Hofmann's day meant what we now call acetaldehyde.  The lower homologue was formaldehyde.  "Formic" acid was named after the Latin word for "ant", because this acid was first obtained by destructive distillation of thousands of ants.Ajrocke (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formosus 

message: This relatively new section is incorrect in some ways.  There is an excellent treatment of the subject, with proper references and readily available on the web, at https://webspace.yale.edu/chem125/125/history99/6Stereochemistry/models/models.html  I will make the necessary changes to this section.Ajrocke (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molecular Models
Talk:Lin Hatfield Dodds

message: I know Lin Hatfield Dodds and her family on friendly terms, although she would not class me as a friend. Peter Ellis 20:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:My Scary Girl

message: I removed the prod tag. The movie has been presented in festivals . Also seems to meet WP:NOTFILM easily. Pascal.Tesson 20:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Arthur Fowler

message: This might be of use to this article. Brad 15:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And perhaps this has some additional information (though it might not!). anemone│projectors 20:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I had not noticed this in here before. Should this be in this article? It seems like it's just promotion of the band, it's not "a resurgence of the public campaign", it's just the name of the band. Possibly a popular culture section could be included, mentioning that the band use this name, and for what reason etc. But the cillit bang stuff is not relevant.Gungadin 15:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. anemone│projectors 18:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Public Appeal 

message: In episode 163 (9 September 1986, currently on UKTV Play as series 3 episode 47 if anyone wants to check in the next few days before it expires), Michelle mentions an Uncle Rob. Could we assume this is Arthur's brother? Or is there a reason not to? Has it ever been explicitly said that Arthur has no siblings? It can't be Pauline's brother because we know all of her brothers. I doubt it's someone just referred to as "uncle" like an older family friend because they were talking about Michelle's wedding and it being a family affair. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 12:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle Rob? 

message: Could there be a more flattering photo of Arthur that we can use? Poor Bill lol Susan1621 (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox picture