lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/Sethie

message: I'm a new member of the AMA and do not feel that I'm ready to take on the full responcibility of a case by myself. However I would be intrested in coadvocating a case with a more experianced member of the AMA. If any advocates are willing to mentor me I'd be happy to work this case with them.--Gary123 Apply now, exciting opportunities available at Continental Op Detective Agency! 14:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will also advocate. Computerjoe's talk 18:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dr. Heidegger's Experiment

message: Will someone with more experience please expand this stub? Thanks
WiiWillieWiki 14:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please expand

message: I'm not 100% sure if this can be taken as fact, but my language arts teacher mentioned that Hawthorne's works such as Dr. Heidegger's Experiment can be interpreted figuratively to change the meaning. When we went over this story in class, she said that the story was actually about Dr. Heidegger giving his friends plain liquor and them believing it was working. I'm not sure if that's correct, though. Should I add it in? Hannah Kerela 02:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Figurative Language?

message: The article says this story "reflects the Nationalistic period, where the strange and picturesque were incorporated in many of the authors of the time." Which Nationalistic period does this refer to? I'm presuming it's something to do with America, but I'm sort of confused because nationalism implies something to do with politics. Kennard2 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalistic period?

message: I'm curious as to the validity of character descriptions. For example, the story never specifically says how Mr. Medbourne comes to lose his money, aside from that it was due to frantic speculation. Much less does the tale evolve a subplot of his gambling and denial thereof.
Metall pingwin (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters? 

message: The reliability of the page on a whole seems debatable. In the intro, it says something about the short being first published in "twice told stories," then, in the notes it claims it were published elsewhere. Also, grammar and spelling seem on the downside. I'm too lazy to change it...
KuroAi15 (talk) 02:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliability 
Talk:LGBT rights in the Bahamas

message: Hello, I fixed some spelling errors, a few grammatical errors, though the sections "Anti-LGBT Violence" and "Impact on LGBT culture" need a lot more editing. I also fixed some reference links that were messed up. I did standardize the LGBT acronym that was used throughout since there were a few variations and standardized the date structure. Jlakin (talk) 20:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: CE edits

message: I added the gay rights box. In the article, it states that the age of consent is 18. is that an equalized or non-equalized age of consent? Axel Löfving 11:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goombay

message: Can anybody verify that German band (The?) Goombay Dance Band "popularized the style" of Goombay music? 
Didn't they just take the name, but musically do other things? 2A02:3032:40C:ED1C:2:2:E738:17A2 (talk) 10:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  German band - real connection?
Talk:Blake Alphonso Higgs

message: This article states the Beach Boys' version of Sloop John B was based on Higgs' version, but the article about the song says it was based on the Kingston Trio's recording of the song.2601:644:1:B7CB:80A0:DA88:EECE:4F8F (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  John B
Talk:Ripsaw music

message: Nice article. Upon reading paragraph 3 " Though little is known for certain about ripsaw's genesis, two major theories include that the instrument was played to imitate the sound of the [guido], a Dominican and Haitian accordion..." it struck me as unfeasible that a percussive scraping saw could imitate any type of accordian, nor could I find an article on such a [guido], so I think it is far more likely that this should read "guiro" - which is not any type of accordian but is rather a scraping percussion instrument of South and Central America. On the other hand "guido" rather than "guiro" is the spelling used in the link but that reference does not say that a guido is a type of accordian. I suspect 'guido' may be a local spelling of 'guiro' but I will make no amendment given that I know nothing about any of this, (although I do have a guiro!) - for future editors.SeventhHell (talk) 05:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph 3 - 'guido' or 'guiro'?
Talk:Black Point, Bahamas

message: Accoding the map in the article, it seems that Black Point lies on a single Cay. Is the cay (or the island) also called Black Point? --Vnnen (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that the cay is called Great Guana Cay. --Vnnen (talk) 15:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Ill Suited

message: I noticed this paragraph on the article for this episode...
"From this episode on, Kim and Ron are boyfriend and girlfriend rather than just friends. Soap opera-style drama will be avoided, and their relationship will remain intact throughout the remainder of the series" (emphasis mine)
I saw that part (what is in bold) and my reaction is, "No soap-opera style, that's a relief". It started way too soapy/WB teen drama style for most of Season 3.
WAVY 10 14:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New episode

message: I have tagged this article with  as there is established policy regarding plot summaries: NOT#IINFO 7 Plot summaries. - Tiswas(t) 08:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:Spanish Wells

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
The Wiki article for Spanish Wells points to a location just off the island of Eleuthera, but the GeoHack coordinates point to a neighborhood in New Providence that is also named Spanish Wells. This leads to confusion for users attempting navigate to the location of the former from the Wiki article.
—Rscannix (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've emended the coordinates to correspond to the correct Spanish Wells. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Deor (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: A "centre for lobster fishing and tourism in the Bahamas"? The first one yes, the second one not, even though nature there is overwhelmingly beautiful. One cannot get wine or beer in a restaurant (they have none, and they sell none on the whole island just ike in Iran, and the restaurants have not a single option for low-fat dishes as everything (?) is deep-freid like in the southern U.S. Also, there is not a single pub in existence, and foreigners are given the clear feeling that they are not welcome there. No, no tourism at all there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:DF04:6500:F045:BA78:889E:B2CA (talk) 15:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism?
Talk:Walnut Hill School

message: Why were 21 people expelled from Walnut Hill?71.233.193.32 14:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Economy of the Bahamas

message: In at least two places, including the first sentence, the Bahamas is said to be in the Caribbean. But conventionally the Caribbean only includes places that are in or on the edge of the Caribbean Sea, and the area containing both the Caribbean islands and those in the Lucayan (Bahamas and Turks and Caicos) archipelago is called the West Indies. This convention is upheld in our article Caribbean (see second paragraph of the lead). While sometimes the convention is flouted to avoid wordiness at the expense of precision, I think we should stick to the conventional wording. Loraof (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caribbean? 

message: by user:Materialscientist. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economy_of_the_Bahamas&diff=1142182999&oldid=1142182951 An edit summary or explanation would be helpful. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:D465:4D6F:4EBE:845D (talk) 00:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No-explanation revert .. 

message: Its not when you have DR and PR with higher gdp numbers both in ppp and nominal, what am i missing ? Please help 186.6.142.37 (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richest in the caribbean? How?
Talk:List of companies of the Bahamas

message: 30px	I have cleaned this list of non-notable companies; this includes companies with no Wikipedia article and no satisfactory third party claim to notability. This is in line with the Manual of Style guidance for lists and notability guidelines. Remember that Wikipedia is not a directory - listing all companies is not necessarily useful. Before you add a new companies please ensure they meet the relevant notability guidelines, supported by reliable sources. In general it is best if the company has a Wikipedia page (on which notability is established) before it is added.
 --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 08:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List cleaned
Talk:Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas

message: Parnell, Tucker & Huckabee succeeded fully to the governorship, leaving the lieutenant governorship vacant. GoodDay (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections to article
Talk:Parasympathomimetic drug

message: Have you considered including Huperzine as a parasympathomimetic agent in this article?
Huperzine A, is a naturally occurring sesquiterpene alkaloid compound found in the herb Huperzia serrata.
Huperzine A is an Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. In the US Huperzine A is sold as a dietary supplement for memory support.
Drgao (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huperzine 

message: Is it acceptable to add these two YouTube links in this article? 
* Pharmacology - CHOLINERGIC DRUGS (MADE EASY)
* Pharmacology - ANTICHOLINERGIC & NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING AGENTS (MADE EASY)
As a lay person, I found them very helpful. Jd4x4 (talk) 16:46, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add YouTube links?
Talk:Beta2-adrenergic agonist

message: There are studies that show asthma drugs (not sure which) will enlarge the muscles in the heart resulting in increased risk for heart attacks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.170.143 (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Salbutamol is listed as albuterol. Both names are correct but albuterol is not really recognised outside of the USA. Salbutamol is the International Nonproprietary Name.
Moley.mole1 (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Salbutamol]] 

message: Should Ractopamine be added in this article? Badagnani 17:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ractopamine]] 

message: A single dose of beta2-agonist increases heart rate by 10 BPM. Salpeter et al meta-analysed the data and found more tachycardias and hypokalaemia - unsurprisingly but informatively.  JFW | T@lk 10:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cardiovascular complications 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ninaanastasio (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning

message: — Assignment last updated by JustinxLane (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2023
Talk:Bronchodilator

message: While short acting beta-2 agonists generally have considerably less cardiac manifestations than Beta-1 agonists, it is completely inaccurate to say that they do not have cardiac effects.  If you look for newer long acting bronchodilator safety studies on pubmed, there are studies where the newer drug increases heart rate 5-8 compared to salbutamol's 12-15 bpm increase.  Additionally there are Beta-2 receptors within the myocardium.  I am therefore find the article to not be trustworthy and in need of editing.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.40.99 (talk) 11:57, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I have read that Tetrahydrocannabinol (the active ingredient in cannabis) is a bronchodilator. I don't have a source, but if I find one this probably merits inclusion in this article, correct? Andre (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really like the idea of having Marijuana on a list of 'commonly used bronchodilators'. Just did a very quick google which showed a few links but none looked very reliable. Still, I'm not going to dispute it's action... just it being listed s a commonly used bronchodilator. For now I'll just move it to the bottom of the list I think.McPat (talk) 02:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  THC?
Talk:Tocolytic

message: I removed the designation "not effective" from MgSO4.  I did not read the article that was referenced after this statement so I don't know the quality of the study.  They may have very well found that Mag. sulfate is ineffective, or it may be that the study wasn't very good.  
Regardless, MgS04 is still used in most hospitals (often as first choice) for tocolysis.  Someone reading this article may be confused by the "ineffective" distinction, given what is going on in practice today without a lengthy discussion on its effectiveness.  I think it is best we leave this out of this page as this is not the place for a discussion of MgSO4's effectiveness.   Instead that discussion can be placed in the MgSO4 article.    I am not familiar with the use of the other "ineffective" drugs listed to warrant changing their descriptive status.  Someone who is may wish to make further alterations IthinkIwannaLeia (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  disagree with above. if hospitals are using a medication with demonstrated inefficacy for tocolysis, than practice not definition should change. magnesium has many useful adjuncts in pregnancy -- fetal neuroprotection and preeclampsia seizure prophylaxis. So there is a still a role for its use. If it has not shown to be effective, the practice of magnesium for tocolysis should stop.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westcoastmd (talk • contribs) 03:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After reviewing your groups final edits to the article, it looks like you guys did a great job accomplishing your goals. I found that you have substantially improved the article with the addition of "indications" section, "future directions" section, and the update of the table and other resources. In regards to the general tone of the article, it is neutral and unbiased. There is sensitivity to gender as some of the edits made referred to the pregnant person in gender neutral terms, however there was some inconsistency with the non-edited areas of the article that still referred to pregnant persons as mothers. Additionally, information was a presented in a clear and concise manner, understandable for individuals that are not medical experts.K.Alcera (talk) 21:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback From Group 16 to Group 31
Talk:Chicago White Sox all-time roster

message: I'm against merging List of Chicago White Sox people and Chicago White Sox all-time roster unless it is done uniformly for all teams. As the all-time rosters are already long, I would prefer to see the all-time rosters kept as separate pages, and have the players be a "See also" section in the lists of xxx team people. --Kathy A. 16:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know who proposed it, but it's a pretty stupid idea. The all-time rosters are too long to be thrown in the other articles. I'm gonna remove the merge suggestion.--Wizardman 15:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge
Talk:Chicago Cubs all-time roster

message: Note to other editors: The original list was taken from the Cubs official website, and includes players who were on the 40 man roster but never appeared in a game. As we find them, they should be removed, as this list is for players who appeared in at least one game. Thanks! Kathy A. 15:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original list

message: The 1871 team was close to winning the first league pennant when its home ballpark was lost to a fire ;-)
Three of the eleven players need only "1871" in their listings because they were present and in the same roles when the club returned to competition in 1874. 
*Mike Brannock
*Fred Treacey
*George Zettlein
Eight of them are not listed. Here are suggested listings as "Cubs".
*Ed Duffy, SS, 1871
*Tom Foley (outfielder), OF/C, 1871
*Charlie Hodes, C, 1871
*Marshall King, OF/C, 1871
*Bub McAtee, 1B, 1871
*Ed Pinkham, 3B/P, 1871
*Joe Simmons, OF, 1871
*Jimmy Wood, 2B, 1871
This suggested listing for Foley distinguishes him from Tom Foley (baseball). I have added him to the tomfoley disambiguation too. 
The links are now seven blue and four red. The blue are all in :Category:Chicago White Stockings players. P64 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: rearrange this report for clarity --P64 (talk) 00:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1871
Talk:Minnesota Twins all-time roster

message: MLB includes the Washington Senators (1901-1960) players in with their list of Twins all-time players, and most of the other all-time rosters on Wikipedia include players from former names/cities. Any particalar reason not to include them here? --Fabrictramp 18:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My thought is that I would prefer a separate Senators roster.  The MLB only added the Senators records to the Twins records a couple of years ago, and there really isn't much acknowledgment of those years for Twins fans; ie, Walter Johnson isn't in the Twins Hall of Fame.  I think with the Senators, it would be best to do like the Expos and Nationals and have each have separate rosters despite the MLB's inclusion in their records.  There's just not the same historical continuity there as with other teams because the Senators records were considered separate for so long. matt91486 19:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Senators players
Talk:List of Miami Marlins managers

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Colorado Rockies managers and owners which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 22:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Nathan

message: NO
D I E.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:ED8E:7B01:7820:E291:7BA7:BA14 (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

message: Do we really need two separate disambiguation pages for "Nathan"?  Why not one page? —Dfass 15:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The Manual of Style requires disambiguation pages only to contain people if they are known by that name alone.  I have therefore left Nathan (Prophet) and one other, and moved the rest of the people including the Biblical ones to Nathan (given name). - Fayenatic (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn, I think you're right!  Here are excerpts from MOS:DABNAME: "Persons who have the disambiguated term as surname or given name should not be mixed in with the other links unless they are very frequently referred to simply by the single name (e.g. Elvis, Shakespeare)." I'll fix that for you ASAP Hutcher (talk) 17:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Bang Kruai district

message: As my English is not so very good, can somebody clarify the History for me:
*"The district was created in 1904 and named Bang Yai."
We are talking here about Amphoe Bang Kruai, right?  
*"Due to its big size it was difficult to administer, and thus in 1917 the northern part was split off as minor district (King Amphoe) Bang Maenang. 1921 Bang Maenang became a full district."
But there is no full district (that's an Amphoe, isn't it?) Bang Maenang. (This sentence makes only sense, when you read the article about adjacent Amphoe Bang Yai.)
*"On October 19 1930 the district was renamed to Bang Kruai, after the geographic shape of district - Kruai is the Thai word for cone." 
Now that's my problem: when I look at the small map in the article, I cannot even with my best imagination see any cone? Can me somebody tell me please where to look? --hdamm 15:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Marshall James

message: What do you mean by clean-up? If you mean 'delete', don't. It's doing nobody any harm, and a world finalist NEEDS a page, damn it.
:No no no no!! I don't mean delete! I should have different sections, such as birth (include birth date, where he was born), darts (how he got into it) and proffessional career. I see you've wikified it which is good RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 15:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1965 South Australian state election

message: Does anyone know the reason for the slashing of the DLP vote at this election? It was before Whitlam became the federal ALP leader. Did Dunstan have a far greater "DLP-nulling" effect (as a state MP) than Whitlam did (as deputy to Calwell)? (as the vote was slashed before the ALP came to power here and not after federally) Timeshift 04:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DLP
Talk:Muscarinic agonist

message: Argh, why isn't there a page on Muscarinic receptor antagonists?? Why the redirect? Muscarinic antagonists are much more widespread (atropine, hyoscyamine, scopolamine), and they should have their own page. Fuzzform 22:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go: Muscarinic receptor antagonist. Now help it grow. --Arcadian 02:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of World Heritage Sites in Scotland

message: What is the point of this list when there is already a list of sites in the UK which clearly shows those situated in Scotland? 82.1.163.32 (talk) 22:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It allows for a lot more detail, and the public sector processes are different. Ben MacDui 16:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Already a list for the UK 
Talk:WBNS (AM)

message: Given that AM stations have no sufixxes, shouldn't the correct title of the article be WBNS (AM) instead of that page going to a redirect? Someone please change this, thanks. Scrabbleship 15:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the article, per this request being listed at WP:RM for five days without opposition.  Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:IWoz

message: I believe this article has mission creep. It should be a suscinct description of the book itself. The biographical material should be integrated into the article about Steve Wozniak and this book should be applied as the reference. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mission creep?  What's that?  So you think that the entire "Description" section should be nixed?  It's a detailed outline of what Wozniak discusses in the book.  What's wrong with that? Other books have much more detailed accounts of the book's contents. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, the article already uses the book as a reference for a great deal of its material.  I do think all the information from the book would help the Steve Wozniak article, but I don't really want to do it myself (right now).  If you want to go ahead and shove the stuff into the Wozniak article and take it out of here as you do so, that's fine with me.  But I don't think it should all be whacked in one go, unless it is added to the Wozniak article as well.  All the information is valid, and think it deserves a place on Wikipedia.  But I don't really care whether it appears here or another article. — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope creep