lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karl Mayer

message: Hmm... has it been stated that he's jewish? Pjär80 23:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I propose to merge Karl Mayer into the list of characters because the character has not managed to establish clear notability. Apart from the fact that within the series he is not a major character (only the Season 2 appearances, the rest are cameos and minor interventions), in the real world there is a lack of deep coverage by a vast amount of reliable secondary sources on Karl, and there is no impact in popular culture. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A week has passed and there was not opposition at all. The article is then merged into the list. --LoЯd ۞pεth 05:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I din't know about this. Look, Karl was a regular back in season two, credited as a "star", and it has been established for a very long time that stars get pages here on DH wiki. And the fact that he keeps coming back every season for cameo appearances marks him as a notable character from the past who the fans yearn to see so much he is brought back every year. He appeared in two episodes already this season. Karl deserves to have his own page. Why do people insist on deleting character pages? Leave DH alone, there are a lot of shows with dozens of pages for characters that don't were in only two or three episodes, go merge or delete those. - Renaboss (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Renaboss, first of all you have to watch your tone. You have no right to tell people what to do or not. Merging is not deleting, it is, according to Wikipedia:Merge, "a normal editing action, something any editor can do, and as such does not need to be proposed and processed." However, I asked other contributors by placing a tag during a week. Second, you seriously need to read the wiki policies and guidelines on Notability and Fiction. Almost none of the articles on DH characters have managed to prove notability, instead focus entirely on large and in-universe plot sections, and that's why DH has no any good article or featured article at all. Surely there's information out there to prove notability on really important characters like Susan, Lynette, Mike, etc. However, I think that secondary characters (like Karl, John, Felicia) have less chances to meet notability. A bebo page is not notability, it is merely an external link, and cameo appearances in later seasons have nothing to do with notability.. If you add reception sections with deep analysis and large coverage by reliable secondary sources, and facts that prove impact in popular culture, then all those articles you are defending might deserve their own article. For instance, Wikipedia:Trivia sections must be avoided. --LoЯd ۞pεth 19:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Gayathri (1977 film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Ran for 22 days, with 1 support. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Gaayathri →  – Though the censor certificate says "Gaayathri", it does not look like the common spelling. Kailash29792 (talk)  18:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 October 2022
Talk:Bairavi

message: Has an infobox, but needs expanding badly so am leaving the tag in place
RWardy 20:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Aame Katha

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: There is a link to the imdb which should suffice as a reference. ~~ Sintaku Talk 16:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is notable.
Talk:Danger Island (TV series)

message: Looking for source of Oh O Jongo - and danger island cropped up. Never heard of or watched Danger Island - so I've not got Oh O Jongo from there. I suspect it's from children's TV though (early 1970s) - and was said when one was in trouble. Anyone shed light on that ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.225.1.130 (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh O Jongo
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Shakespeare

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: Your view is welcome at Talk:William_Shakespeare#Lead_image. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feel like discussing the [[WP:LEADIMAGE]] at [[William Shakespeare]]? 

message: More eyes welcome. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:The_Merchant_of_Venice#Plot_summary]]
Talk:Sam Lantinga

message: His former web site, http://www.devolution.com/~slouken, now redirects to "AOL Advertising / Project Devil."  How strange!  Does anyone know why that is, or whether Sam has a new web site?   This is important to the Mac gaming community, because his web site is the only place people can download Maelstrom for OS X. 71.219.173.1 (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sam's web site

message: I'm shocked that nothing has been written about his software: splitvt! --Deep Alexander (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  splitvt 
Talk:The ABC Saturday Superstar Movie

message: Was November 17, 1973, the final telecast or the final first-run episode? It was not unusual for Saturday morning cartoons of this era to air the final first-run episode in November and show reruns for the rest of the season. Can anyone confirm this?Rockhopper10r 19:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Final telecast
Talk:The Appletree Theatre

message: I was impressed to see an article about this amazing album. A true classic from that era. It is a shame that the rumours of a second album proved false. HOWEVER,today I recieved an email and the first album has at long last been released as a CD! I hope Wikipedia does not mind me mentioning this, I know that there are a number of other fans who heard the rumour a few years back and will be anxious to find the CD. Go to Terry Bolan's home page and follow the link. If you have never heard of Appletree Theatre I have no idea if you would like the CD. It is unique. I don't know if I would like it that much if I had not heard it when I did and have so many memories around it. Anyone for an Appletree Reunion? Drhowell7 23:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info - I will add a reference to the reissue.  Ghmyrtle 10:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Timothy McVeigh

message: I changed the type of terrorist in the lede from domestic to Christian, and added a reliable source supporting the assertion that the OKC bombing was an act of Christian terrorism due to the perpetrators' ties (possibly indirect and circumstantial, granted, but ties nonetheless) to Christian Identity. Those changes were reverted and I disagree with that decision. Groupthink (talk) 02:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Given this is a topic that is spanning several talk pages it might make sense to raise this at NPOVN where we could discuss this in one place.  Otherwise I'm sure we will end up repeating our selves. Springee (talk) 11:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

text: You need to show the connection as relgious, not political, motivation.  As noted elsewhere (and duly noting Springee's comment), there is no specific religious tie to CI.  The only tie to it is coordination with one CI group based on political, not religious, motivations.  And there is no reliable source that I have seen that ever drew such a conclusion.  It's purely WP:SYNTH. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I looked up the author, Ackerman, and searched about for corroborating details. The "link" to CI is weak, and fringe. The only other claims that McVeigh and his actions were religious terrorism come from unreliable sources. We don't put fringe theories into the encyclopedia, and we particularly don't 'rebrand' someone as a religious extremist when their actions were (per reliable sources) politically driven (even if there are religious undertones). Fails NPOV. Meets WP:FRINGE. There's also a sense of WP:RGW when a drive to relabel several other articles is taking place at the same time. Vastly better sources (emphasis on plural) are required to completely restate the motives of these people. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian terrorist 

message: may we please add in addition to 'is a domestic terrorist', is a 'white supremacist' or a 'neo-Nazi', b/c McVeigh was a 'white supremacist'. Monkeylady999 (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: He is primarily notable for being a domestic terrorist, and his motivation for his actions was anti-government extremism. The lede is a summary of the article. His white supremacist and neo-Nazi tendencies are noted in the body, but they are secondary to the actions he is notable for.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: k, thanx for clearing that up. Monkeylady999 (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  description 

message: In the intro, change "the deadliest domestic act of terror" to "one of the deadliest". 
In truth, the bombing was not even the deadliest act of terror in the history of Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Race Riots killed more people. 184.145.139.223 (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: the cited source describes it as such and so does the FBI. M.Bitton (talk) 16:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 May 2024
Talk:List of birds of Cuba

message: The source from Avibase or whatever says that only 25 are endemic... Please explain. —ÅñôñÿMôús Dîššíd3nt 07:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: This revision converts the article to the taxonomy of the American Ornithological Society's Check-list of North and Middle American Birds for consistency with other western hemisphere lists for entities north of South America. In addition it brings the list itself up to date. The specific changes, which follow AOS unless noted otherwise, are:
*Revise the sequence of families.
*Revise the Orders of families Apodidae (swifts) and Trochilidae (hummingbirds).
*Revise three genera and the sequence of species in family Columbidae (pigeons and doves).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Trochilidae (hummingbirds).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Rallidae (rails, gallinules, and coots)
*Revise the sequence of species in family Charadriidae (plovers and lapwings).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Scolopacidae (sandpipers and allies).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Procellariidae (shearwaters and petrels).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Phalacrocoracidae (cormorants and shags).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Accipitridae (hawks, eagles, and kites).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Picidae (woodpeckers).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Psittacidae (New World and African parrots).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Tyrannidae (tyrant flycatchers).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Hirundinidae (swallows).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Passerellidae (New World sparrows).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Thraupidae (tanagers and allies).
*Revise the text, counts, and references to reflect the above.
Craigthebirder (talk) 13:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 17, 2020 revision
Talk:University of Nigeria

message: Please contact us through the following email addresses:
Professor Benjamin Chukwuma Ozumba, 
Vice Chancellor - 
benjamin.ozumba@unn.edu.ng
Professor P.E. Chigbu, 
Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic) - 
polycarp.chigbu@unn.edu.ng
Professor Igbokwe, Edwin Mbadiwe, 
Deputy Vice Chancellor (Administration) - 
edwin.igbokwe@unn.edu.ng
Anthony I. Okonta, 
Registrar - 
anthony.okonta@unn.edu.ng
Dr. Mrs. Chinwe Nwogo Ezeani, 
University Librarian - 
chinwe.ezeani@unn.edu.ng
Mrs. C.E. Obi, 
Bursar - 
chineze.obi@unn.edu.ng
==========================
Dr. Olisa Okeke, 
Director, ICT - 
olisa.okeke@unn.edu.ng
Talk to the ICT Team Leads - 
ict.teamleads@unn.edu.ng
For all training issues - 
ict.training@unn.edu.ng
For SERVICOM issues - 
servicom@unn.edu.ng
For Webometric issues - 
webometrics@unn.edu.ng
For all Payment/Portal/Website/Email usage issues - 
issues@unn.edu.ng
Regards,
Somadina Akam.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.146.0.43 (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Nigeria Contact Information 

message: Dr. Olisa Okeke, 
Director, ICT - 
olisa.okeke@unn.edu.ng
Talk to the ICT Team Leads - 
ict.teamleads@unn.edu.ng
For all training issues - 
ict.training@unn.edu.ng
For SERVICOM issues - 
servicom@unn.edu.ng
For Webometric issues - 
webometrics@unn.edu.ng
For all Payment/Portal/Website/Email usage issues - 
issues@unn.edu.ng
Regards,
Somadina Akam.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.146.0.43 (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ==============
Talk:Opportuna of Montreuil

message: I have made some revisions. When onme changes one's sources in order to make them believable, the result is neither good history nor intewllectual honesty. Very naughty... and thoroughly Christian, might I add? --Wetman 04:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, and so I'm rather confused. I wasn't really going for historical revisionism so much as trying to reconcile some very different sources. I tried to go more for ommission of details than introducing incongruities. Anyway, thanks for the insight, especially in regards to the Siege of Paris (since I would have had no idea that's what her vitae were referring to). I'm going to clean them up a bit by adding them into the "Notes" section. Alekjds talk 04:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't work my notes into your format: I shall sit down now and stop rocking the boat, so you can edit. It's a general rule that the more extreme miracles and tortures in hagiographies are gracefully elided in all the versions available on the web. I haven't seen the Vita, but I'd bet the king is simply Carolus without "Bald" or "Fat". The tacit understanding is that Opportuna and her family were Carolingian nobles, as all bishops of Gaul were: should that be mentioned? --Wetman 05:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Perhaps, but it seems to me an implicit assumption with saints of this age, as I've seen that most "poor" or "common" saints are usually mentioned as being such. By the way, I had actually worked all your notes into the Notes format, but it was lost in the edit conflict. I suppose I'll just rework them  as before. Alekjds talk 20:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions
Talk:Sabrina's Secret Life

message: Are you sure that LaMarche voiced Salem ? because here is nothing on Salem's article Matthew Cantrell (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Maurice LaMarche]] ? 

message: Cartoon Network never aired the series not in the U.S. at least but outside the U.S.it aired on Cartoon Netowrk at least in the U.K. Matthew Cantrell (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartoon Network?
Talk:Anthony Harrison

message: I'm just curious as to whether we know anything about Harrison's life after his 1989 graduation. I know that each Wikipedia article subject has a different amount of source material to work with, but it seems like we have significant gaps here for a GA. In addition to the 35 years after his graduation, we have nothing for the years between his birth and his high school graduation. Since he is only 58, that means we have only covered a tiny portion of the man's life. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update?
Wikipedia talk:Shortcut index/Project shortcuts

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial Arts Please add to list. Tkjazzer 00:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this redirects to Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts and is a miscapitalization, not a shortcut. Sorry it took so long to respond; however, this page is seldom watched by editors. Actually, never mind because I just saw the page move in July 2007 about three months after your request. I just added  to the list.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  21:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add

message: Please look at this discussion about what to do with a messy shortcut problem: Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Shortcut WP:BLP1E should not link here Editors should know this to avoid confusion, and I suspect a lot of miscommunication has been caused by it. Three months ago (Dec. 11), the WP:BLP1E link was changed from a section of WP:BLP to WP:BIO. Editors who have thought about WP shortcuts could probably contribute something valuable to the discussion, so please take a look. Noroton (talk) 00:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with WP:BLP1E shortcut
Talk:Alberta Highway 759

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Alberta provincial highway 759 → Alberta secondary highway 759 — It is a secondary highway, not a primary/provincial highway.  Why was it moved incorrectly before? Windrider6 00:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
#Support - Is a secondary highway not a primary highway.  Renaming it would conform to other secondary highway articles already in wikipedia Kc4 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 08:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
#Support - Is a secondary highway not a primary highway.  Renaming it would conform to other secondary highway articles already in wikipedia Kc4 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 08:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Executive Assistant District Attorney

message: This really needs to be merged into a broader article about the operations of a prosecutorial office, since the exact job duties, titles, and hierarchy varies with each office. I know that my former office had all three titles, and each one had a different job. The Chief Assistants (note the plural) were in charge of their respective divisions (appeals, screening, trials, juvenile, etc...) and supervision of their subordinates, while the Executive Assistant was more like the accounting department. The First Assistant just made sure that she got her shopping, nails, and massages done on time...
:There is no reason at all to merge this with any other article.  If you want to write an article about the operations of a prosecutor's office, do so.  Don't merge this with it, though.  That would be like merging the article on the Vice President of the United States with an article on White House operations, or merging the article explaining what a Lieutenant Governor is with a general article on state government, or merging the article explaining what a Colonel is with the article about the United States Army.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.111.176 (talk) 01:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Difference between this article and one about the Vice President of the United States is that there is only one Vice President; while there are quite possibly hundreds of Executive/First/Chief Assistant District Attorneys in the United States alone. Each individual position is likely to be unique to that specific office. While one can quite easily write an article that encompasses the duties and responsibilities of an office that is only held by one person at a time, it is quite another to write one article that covers a generic title that applies to hundreds of different situations in hundreds of different offices. Besides, discussing this particular job position is getting down into the weeds. This all should be wrapped up into a general article on prosecutorial office operations; or even into the general articles on District Attorneys or Prosecutors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.82.171.153 (talk) 03:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Chañaral

message: I added the template:peacock to the article. The lead section reads like something from a tourist brochure. Unencyclopaedic. Because it's in the lead section, I consider tagging the whole article appropriate. Because I don't really know Chilean geography or Chañaral, I consider I cannot edit this for the better. I'll just add the tagging. Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland (talk) 06:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Peacock, March 2014
Talk:Araucanía Region

message: By "lupine", do they mean Lupinus albus, known in Spanish as "altramuz"? Jonur (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  lupine 
Talk:The Valet (2006 film)

message: The link to the wiki article on Richard Berry is a completley different person. The actor who played the lawyer is indeed named richard berry, but he is not an african american singer who died 10 years before the films release. I cant find an article on the correct richard berry so i have removed the link until someone makes one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.4.74.65 (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Berry- incorrect link 

message: Should something be said about the Lille strike? --Error (talk) 22:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lille 

message: Is Maître his name or a title for lawyers? --Error (talk) 22:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maître Foix