lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WildBrain

message: Yes, I believe DHX Media Vancouver should be merged into DHX Media under the section Studio B Productions. Typing with Wings (talk) 01:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging DHX Media and DHX Media Vancouver 

message: Late last year DHX merged the studios formerly known as Nerd Corps Entertainment and Studio B Productions into a single facility called DHX Studios Vancouver. As of this writing, the Nerd Corps page has been edited to follow the new name, but I don't think that's how it should be done. I suggest creating a separate page specifically for the post-merger studio and leaving the Nerd Corps and Studio B pages as defunct businesses. The two studio pages could be merged into one, but I wouldn't suggest that as they were two independent businesses with a sizeable history before the merger.Damnedfan1234 (talk) 22:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  DHX Studios Vancouver 

message: Change "Dana Landry" to "Michael Donovan" to CEO
Change "Steven DeNure" to "Josh Scherba" for President
Add "Aaron Ames" as COO instead of Steven Denure
Add "Douglas Lamb" for Chief Financial Officer
Add "Anne Loi" to Chief Commercial Officer Alfa225 (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you please provide a reliable source to support the changes? Much thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DannyS712 (talk) 23:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2019 

message: Please apply the changes in this diff:  5.104.90.107 (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done NiciVampireHeart 15:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2019 

message: 2600:1700:8BB0:51B0:7D3A:11B7:5BB6:B1DA (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2023 

message: 2601:46:37F:3840:D82A:C26B:5D76:9EBA (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rehsarb (talk) 12:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2024
Talk:Yazidi Black Book

message: The Black Book and the other so-called scriptures have been systematically debunked by scholars as being false; not only are they in modern Kurdish, but they are written in a dialect that is not spoken anywhere near Yazidi but was spoken natively by the seller of the books to antiquarians. I will write this up in a bit with cites in the article itself. em zilch (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Falsified
Talk:Administrative divisions of Canada

message: *Not Supported. It has been suggested that this article be merged with the Canada article.  When you see the Canada article, you may realize that it is already long and a bit unwieldy for general readers.  The idea then is, rather than merge articles like this one with the Canada article, this article ought to be expanded into as good an article about the administrative divisions of Canada as it can be.
:Also, there is an invisible comment at the top of the Canada page that goes like this... 
:That "List of basic Canada topics" Redirects to "Outline of Canada", and I have added a link to this article on that page in the following section: Government and politics of Canada. If anyone thinks there are better places for such links back to this article, then by all means correct my edit. 
:So in light of all this, the Merge template will be removed from these pages in a few days, unless there is strong opposition to it.  Thank you very much for your help to improve Wikipedia!
: —  .`^) Paine Ellsworthdiss`cuss (^`.  03:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Canada" article 

message: Merge into Provinces and territories of Canada, perhaps? Littledogboy (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Leave Provinces and territories of Canada as is. There is a forthcoming effort to create a List of municipalities in Canada (currently a redirect). Once created, I'd suggest making this a dab pointing to Provinces and territories of Canada and List of municipalities in Canada. If it can't wait, make this a dab and point to Municipal government in Canada in place of the forthcoming list. Hwy43 (talk) 08:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Why is are there a couple of Manitoba categories at the bottoms? They should probably be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackery01 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manitoba Categories?  

message: After 7 years of discussion and no new elemens coming from this, I propose to merge into Provinces and territories of Canada. Double Plus Ungood (talk) 04:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  interesting. Please provide a link for perusal. Hwy43 (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Brazilian Women's Articulation

message: Some better English title should be found for this article. --Wloveral (talk) 22:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  League of Brazilian Women? 
Talk:Starburst (magazine)

message: Opening paragraph states that the magazine launched in December 1977, the info panel states November 1st 1977...so, November or December?  It can't be both.  magnius (talk) 16:52, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch month? 

message: The article was saying the last print issue of the first run #365, came out in 2009. It carries an October 2008 cover date, so I corrected the year. It's possible that in 2009 they officially announced there would be no additional print issues. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of issue 365
Talk:Chicken walker

message: I am adding these guys to the article from the cult-classic game Deus Ex.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.218.190.237 (talk) 15:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deus Ex 

message: As far as I can remember (and see), Starscream is a regular humanoid form, not a chickenwalker. Reference to him should probably be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.142.170.12 (talk) 02:53, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a whole bunch of Googling and reached the same conclusion. Some of the robots in the list have multiple incarnations, but they all have one that has actual "chicken legs". (It's really silly to name to that when they are exactly unlike actual chicken legs, but whatever.) There is a version that has legs like that of an actual chicken (or a sheep, dog, horse, lots of animals), so no reverse "knees" (if you can call them that), so that doesn't count. I'll remove him from the list. Retodon8 (talk) 13:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starscream?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volcanoes/Assessment

message: I looked first, rather than change it, but do you really want to have an assessment scale for WikiProject Volcanoes that assesses plate tectonics as "High" rather than "Top" importance?  It's a bit strange, from a volcanologist's viewpoint..  --Blechnic (talk) 04:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is anyone active on this project?  --Blechnic (talk) 17:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong place to write...ResMar 18:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessments question 

message: Under "What if I don't agree with a rating?," the FAQ says, "You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it." However, there doesn't appear to be an assessment request section at all. Am I missing something? Thanks. Brycehughes (talk) 00:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment request section missing
Talk:Employment Relations Act 2000

message: A number of countries (including Britain) have passed "Employment Relations Act" s. The expression should not redirect to the New Zealand Act.Johncmullen1960 (talk) 12:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Deleted previous addition to Freeloading section 
"However, compulsory unionism is incompatible with the right of freedom of association (or non-association) which was one of the rights guaranteed under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990."
Reason: Compulsory unionism is not incompatible with NZ BOR as freedom of association only protects the right to come together with other individuals and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests. see:freedom of association. Freedom of association does not protect against enforced association as this would be incompatible with several other areas of common law such as imprisonment and the ability to gather taxes (as it could be argued that being forced to be a NZ citizen would be incompatible). --Adam (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compulsory Unionism
Talk:Combat Assault Vehicle

message: The referencing here is very poor. Ping User:Guinness323 and User:VickKiang for second opinion. Are you finding anything (I did not; generic name is hardly helping) or is it AfD time? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, there isn't much refs, I'm assuming this game is referring to this version on BGG, but there isn't many refs. So I support an AfD, but  could probably find some printed refs, IMHO. Thanks! VickKiang (talk) 11:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, let's wait for what they can find. It's not like we are in any hurry. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Autovajin

message: ...why is this categorized as a computing article? 74.78.98.109 (talk) 07:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Histopathology

message: These sources have great information that can add detail to the article...
Georgia Highlands University. (N.D.). Classification of Tissues. 
 
Mercer University School of Medicine. (N.D.). Histotechniques. The University of Utah Eccles Health Sciences Library. 
Rolls, Geoffrey. (N.D.). Process of Fixation and the Nature of Fixatives. Leica Bio systems.
Van den Tweel, Jan G., & Taylor, Clive R. (2010).  A brief history of pathology: Preface to a forthcoming series that highlights milestones in the evolution of pathology as a discipline. Virchows Archiv. 
Wong, K.T., Puthucheary, S.D., & Vadivelu, J. (2007). The histopathology of human melloidosis. Wiley Online Library. 
Goodell8 (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to consider using 

message: It seems odd that myocardial infarction has it's own heading in histopathology, as it is one pathology of (well, a whole bunch). I think this should be removed. Thoughts? Waughd (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In myocardial infarction"  section should it be removed?
Talk:Glass fusing

message: Tad Boniecki 28 April 2007. I have added an image of a glass tile to give people an idea of what can be done using glass fusing techniques. I made the tile itself as well as the photo. Should I cite myself as the author?
:The author attribution goes on the image's description page, as it is usually not part of the encyclopedic content. Femto 12:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article was moved from Stub to Start status because it has a significant amount of information and multiple references.  In addition, the main article has not had a Stub tag for some time. Araesmojo (talk) 20:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub to Start 

message: Where is glass designed for fusing manufactured today? What are the brands and points of difference? --Danimations (talk) 07:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glass manufacturers today?
Talk:Monique

message: The article stated with no reference that Monique was of French and Dutch origin.
I highly doubt it is from Dutch origin, as the "que" ending is typically French, and is not used in Dutch language as far as I know.
It's a French origin name, that is popular in Dutch language area and in America, that's another thing, but it doesn't change it's language of origin.
If I'm wrong, and that is also from Dutch language, please provide some references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:486:EE3:25B8:4237 (talk) 17:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monique = French or Dutch?
Talk:Comptometer

message: Article does not mention comptometr schools, which were an important, maybe even crucial part of the success of comptometer. Will try to dig up source later, but at it's height, more than 150 such schools operated around the world, providing "certified comptometer operators" to financial institutions such as insurance companies and banks, which employed them in droves, in room full of "human computers" looking very similar to the "typist pool" rooms in newspapers. Those schools were very important part, and can be credited for playing significant part in the success of the comptometr. קיפודנחש (aka kipod) (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comptometer schools
Talk:Calculating machine

message: * The "17th century Blaise Pascal calculating machines" museum display was already in Mechanical calculator, albeit a different image, so this one was redundant and not merged.
* The "19th and early 20th centuries calculating machines, Musée des Arts et Métiers" image was merged.
* Wikisource link was merged
* Burroughs patent is just one of many—not merged.  Find it in Burroughs' biography.
* Discussion of Babbage's difference engine (No. 2)—better coverage at the specific article, so copied from there.
* See also: George Brown (inventor) and Adding machine merged.
—Wbm1058 (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content merged to [[Mechanical calculator]]
Talk:Pascal's calculator

message: This entry is in response to the removal of this statement by 108.1.194.70
if you go to the All Elementary Mathematics - The Mathematical Web High School page titled:  Tangent plane of a ball, a cylinder and a cone, retrieved today, figure 96 shows the intersection of a cylinder and a plan which is one line in this case MN.
Now take another Cylinder intersecting another plan and their intersection M'N', position the cylinders perpendicularly and touch the planes, MN and M'N' cross in one point.  QED.Ezrdr (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The intersection of two perpendicular cylinders is one point 

message: Sterling Products' "Add-it" had some popularity in the mid 20th century. IBM even marketed a hexadecimal version for code checking. knoodelhed (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plastic versions 

message: The two paragraphs concerning 'talking heads' have nothing to do with mechanical calculators. In particular the bracketed statement "(binary arithmetic)" is entirely unsupported - limiting the head to yes/no answers is not binary arithmetic, and there is no other evidence of binary arithmetic being used in the sources given.
I have removed the bracketed statement, and I would further suggest the two paragraphs are removed from this article.Armulwp (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talking Heads 

message: Donald Knuth recommends placing the apostrophe after the 's' when referring to the diminished radix complement of base n+1 (e.g. nines' complement is the diminished radix complement in base 10), and placing the apostrophe before the 's' when referring to the radix complement of base n (e.g. ten's complement is the radix complement in base 10). See  Numeric complements. The Ones' complement and Two's complement articles also follow this convention.
However, as mentioned in Numeric complements, "Most writers use one's and nine's complement, and many style manuals leave out the apostrophe, recommending ones and nines complement."
--Ebichu63 (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nine's complement, nines' complement, or nines complement?
Talk:Stepped reckoner

message: The reference provided to support the claim that the machine was developed between 1676 and 1694 doesn't appear to explicitly give a completion date of 1694. It claims that Leibniz lived in Paris to work with a mechanic between 1676 and 1694, but it later goes on to say that there is in fact no proof that a working machine was ever completed. Does anyone know of another source that supports if and when the machine was completed?
Everybody knows this is nowhere (talk) 06:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Introduction]] 
Talk:Sector (instrument)

message: A sector is an instrument used in doing quick approximate calculations and is no longer made today.  A proportional compass is a draftsman's device still in modern use that aids in transferring plans and diagrams drawn at one scale to another image drawn at a second larger or smaller scale. 67.0.129.122 (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What you're describing is also called a reduction compass. The term "proportional compass" has been used for both of these devices. From "The Sector: its history, scales, and uses" by Michael R. Williams and Erwin Tomash, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 2003, volume 25, issue 1, pp. 34-47: "Known in English as a sector, most of the early European works refer to it as a proportional compass. This causes confusion with the slightly earlier, less useful, device of the same name." --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

text: I've just added a "redirect hatnote" to point readers toward the reduction compass article if that's what they're looking for. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 16:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A proportional compass is not a sector and should not redirect to this article. 

message: Most of the later works about the sector that I have found in trying to research are about Gunter's version (invented ~1606 with published explanations from ~1623), which was refined/developed compared to the versions by Galileo and Hood (independently invented ~1598). It would be helpful to have a clearer comparison between these variants, and a proper description of the scales included by Gunter, which from what I can tell set the standard for the following centuries. –jacobolus (t) 16:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  overemphasis on Galileo's version
Talk:Dr. Nim

message: Despite the name of the game, the machine does not play the game of Nim, and it's inappropriate to provide a link to the article about Nim without further explanation. I won't edit the article now, since that would seem to involve original research, but the article is certainly in need of editing. The game which the machine does play is better described as a "subtraction game." Note that this game is described in one of the later sections of the Wikipedia article on Nim, as follows: "In another game which is commonly known as Nim (but is better called the subtraction game)…" Ishboyfay (talk) 16:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is commonly known as Nim. The game here is called Dr.Nim, you see the substraction game mostly referred to as Nim. Sometimes "Single pile nim" So there is not a single reason to not call it Nim. Get over yourself ---2001:9E8:8D53:EF00:4DC5:304A:F5FB:60B0 (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the game is a misnomer 

message: Is there no image that can be uploaded for this article? Maineartists (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Rangekeeper

message: A very parochial article.
Naval gunnery was following the developments in coast artillery gunnery in the second half of the 19th century.  Development of AA gunnery starting in WW1 was also rapid and involved tachymetric instruments, with some significant French developments.Nfe (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: I like the technical details on how these machines worked, but I'm missing information on the companies involved. The Picture caption says "Ford Mk 1 Ballistic Computer" Is this Heny Ford's Automobile Company, or another Ford? Are there any other companies or government agencies involved in its development? --BjKa (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development and Manufacture 

message: I keep reading about "computing gunfire solutions", but how were the guns actually fired? I can see some pistol grips of the firing triggers in the FordMk1Rangekeeper.jpg. (I know them for what they are from my visit to USS New Jersey.) Was it usual for someone to hold a trigger in his hand or was it usual to have them "docked" at the console, as pictured, when actally firing? Did the machine fire the guns automatically at the correct moment? Or did the machine tell an operator when to pull the trigger? Or did an operator trigger a firing command and the machine then executed the command at a calculated moment? Or something totally different altogether? --BjKa (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firing 

message: This page, is pretty much just a history of US range keeping, with a few honourable mentions for the british and the japanese getting pastings, what about the sophisticatec rangekeeping the germans had? 
Needs a globalise template, like this:
:Agree, so reassessed B-2 criteria as "no". DPdH (talk) 13:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalise