lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Appraisal theory

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.
===Discussion===    	
===Discussion===
things I noticed: the citations are primarily to Scherer et al.; the citations are to a 2001 work, rather than primary work; although M. Arnold and R. Lazarus are cited as important to the establishment of this approach, their footnotes (#13 and #17) are to Scherer et al., not to their own work; and I didn't find an explanation of "process models" as opposed to "structural models," plus there's a reference to two structural models, which isn't explained (at least not nearby)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.120.168.61 (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: |}</div>
things I noticed: the citations are primarily to Scherer et al.; the citations are to a 2001 work, rather than primary work; although M. Arnold and R. Lazarus are cited as important to the establishment of this approach, their footnotes (#13 and #17) are to Scherer et al., not to their own work; and I didn't find an explanation of "process models" as opposed to "structural models," plus there's a reference to two structural models, which isn't explained (at least not nearby)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.120.168.61 (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-12-11/GNAA

message: Ding dong, the GNAA is dead, the wicked GNAA is dead. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 18:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this have implications for any of the... 100s of less notable sites and people who "ha[ve] no legitimate sources, not even close" as Jimmy Wales says?  I mean, we just had this debate over Faith Freedom International... which I think is less well known than GNAA.  It seems really odd (and bad) to have one but not the other. gren グレン 04:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: At last
Talk:Passive component

message: The article was getting slightly nonsensical and, well, idiotic. The definition was slightly wrong. There were a bunch of elementary school sentences. There were no counterexamples. About half of the sentences were irrelevant ("Ideal capacitors and inductors do not exist"). I rewrote it to be correct (this is a big one), properly referenced, and better (although not yet good). It's unfortunately unformatted (I'm not a normal Wikipedia contributor, so I don't know all the Wiki tags), and not properly wikified. 
It needs some copyediting, although not as badly as the old one (which had shit like: "So they don't change the energy of the signal. Ideal capacitors and inductors however, do not exist. Real capacitors and inductors have resistance. But they are still passive components as they don't add energy to their input."). It could also use some good old fashioned dumbing down. It'd also be nice to copy the formulas from Wyatt's paper (referenced in the article) into the article (equation 3-1 and definition 11) to give a formal definition of passive and active. Lots of other definitions exist that try to say the same thing, incorrectly. This one is the most general. I don't know how to put math into the wiki. 128.30.16.209 22:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with article 

message: Will the passive component definition still be correct if it is expanded to include certain optical devices?  In particular, a beam splitter, as used on a passive optical network, acts on a signal without increasing its power and without requiring the use of an outside power source in order to operate.  This sounds just like other passive optical devices, only it uses light rather than electricity.   However, I do not know for certain whether or not passive components necessarily must be electrical.  If you happen to have seen the term "passive component" used in conjunction with optical components, or if you are an expert in this area, please join the discussion! Riick 20:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand to include optical devices?
Talk:Dzierżoniów

message: :In 1790 representatives from Austria, Prussia, Holland, and Poland met at Reichenbach to discuss the Great Turkish War.
1790? That doesn't sound right. Appleseed (Talk) 20:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned here. Olessi 22:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That link doesn't say anything about the Great Turkish War. Appleseed (Talk) 18:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

text: You're right, it should simply be part of the Ottoman wars in Europe. I'll fix it in the article. Olessi 18:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1790 
Talk:Cathays

message: * Disagree. Cathays Park and Cathays are distinct areas of the city of Cardiff. Cathays is a residential, inner-city suburb whilst Cathays Park is Cardiff's civic centre. Would recommend removing information about Cathays Park from this article and making only a cursory mention of it here, with link. Possibly expand Cathays Park article. Benbristol 12/12/06.
:Thanks for your info.  I'm trying to introduce some information about the political map of cardiff.  I've added some info about the Cathays electoral ward, but this article was originally about the suburb.  Hopefully, not to cause confusion, I think it might be appropriate for the ward to have its own article.  Do you agree with this?  Do you know what geographical areas are located in the ward?  Should it include references to Cardiff city centre, Cathays and Cathays Park?(Sloman 19:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I've rewrote the history section of this.... should sound better! --SunStar Nettalk 23:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Template talk:Regional NSW public transport

message: This makes it clearer. Thanks, JROBBO. Joestella 07:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries - for some reason 80% type looks clearer than 90%. I'll change the other ones to that format too if you'd like. JROBBO 13:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead. Joestella 13:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: *I disagree on the design issue. The upward link being on the right helps to separate it from the box contents.
*This box uses terminology relevant to the public transport system, even where it links to pages with different titles, for example the Port Hacking link.
*Metropolitan NSW is a term used by government to include the three major cities and their environs. All other built-up areas are "rural and regional". The scope of these pages is properly the whole metro area, given that the network is integrated that way. 13:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough for point 2, but can you show me where "South Coast to Southern Highlands Line" is actually used (apart from something I previously made up for Wikipedia for an explanation on the CityRail page)? All of the sites on the web list it as Unanderra-Moss Vale line or Wollongong to Bundanoon, which would need to be distinguished from the rail line which doesn't run that way. All the names of the old main south between Picton and Bowral also have the words Loop Line in them too.  JROBBO 13:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The CityRail network map legend tells of a "South Coast to Southern Highlands" and a "Bowral to Picton (Loop Line)" under "bus services". So what do you think? Leave them as lines, call them bus services, or move them into the bus section? I think they're non-notable unless attached to the old railway articles - the Bowral line is just six buses each way, weekdays only. Joestella 13:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with template 

message: Shouldn't it be named "Intercity/Regional rail" rather than just regional? According to the CityRail network map only the Hunter Line is classified as "Regional" lines, other are named "Intercity" lines. Pikablu0530 04:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is based on Wikipedia's Regional rail nomenclature and was designed to save space. I have no strong feelings about it. Joestella 08:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intercity/Regional? 

message: It looks much better now--Ad@m.J.W.C. 02:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better

message: With the recent rebrand of the Kinetic Group’s subsidiaries such as Surfside Buslines, it should be changed to its current branding Kinetic. Fork99 (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surfside Buslines
Talk:Marcellin Marbot

message: I changed the last two sentences from:
"He belongs to a family that has distinguished itself particularly in the career of arms, giving three generals to France in less than 50 years. His elder brother, Antoine Adolphe Marcelin Marbot, was also a military man of some note."
to:
"He belongs to a family that has distinguished itself particularly in the career of arms, giving three generals to France in less than 50 years, including his elder brother, Antoine Adolphe Marcelin Marbot."
His brother was one of those two other generals from his family, but the last sentence makes it sound like he wasn't. Cornelius (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro
Talk:Atlas (anatomy)

message: I have met 2 persons who had a Atlas to Occiput FUSION after serious accidents, and both claim their lives are now/since normal. The doctor I went to see said it was "a horrible compromise",and Now I'm very confused. I must get a series of "diagnostic shots" before even knowing if c1-Occ fusion or c1-c2 fusion is needed for my "miserably" unstable spine. Arm & hand pain are common, both to fusionees as well as me [no surgery yet].   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brennanmoriarty (talk • contribs) 00:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: Hello to all! I am proposing a merge from the following articles into this article:
* Lateral mass of atlas
* Posterior arch of atlas
* Anterior arch of atlas
This is for the following reasons:
* The main article would benefit significantly from having all this information in one place.
* These articles are very short in length (1-2 sentences) and have not been edited significantly in 3-4 years.
* These topics, if presented together, would enhance the quality of this page and its readership.
* This knowledge shouldn't be obscured from readers of this article by virtue of being isolated in an obscure article of 1-2 lines.
* These topics may receive more attention by being mentioned in the main article.
* The articles, if needs be, could be re-expanded at a later date.
Kind Regards, LT910001 (talk) 06:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It's not really sensible to have this split up among so many articles. WiiWillieWiki 21:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Hello,
I would like to see a section on proximal structures that pass through and around the atlas. Such as, on the outer surfaces - nerves, vessels, and muscles not necessarily attached to atlas but that are within a reasonably small distance, perhaps 1cm or 0.5cm circumferentially, as well as above and below. On the inner surfaces - the connective tissues such as ligaments, bone (already included), meninges (including the dentate ligament), and spinal cord, as well as what passes through the transverse foramen. Having looked over the article I assumed all of the attached structures are included, like ligaments and muscles, but I realized that the dentate ligament, which has a hard attachment to atlas, was not included.
Thank you,
seVEMes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.208.193.4 (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proximal Structrures
Talk:Augustus S. F. X. Van Dusen

message: Could somebody give an idea as to when the stories were published?  Corvus cornix 23:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Late 19th, early 20th centuries; Futrelle died aboard the Titanic in 1912. 138.162.128.52 (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Time frame?
Talk:Pocono 500 (IndyCar)

message: I was at the first 1971 Champ Car race, the Schaefer 500; and I extensively edited section 3.1.1 to reflect the monster traffic jam on PA-115 between the track and the I-80 Blakeslee exit, a problem which exists to this very day, even though the State Police now reverse the northbound lanes before the race.
Interest was very high in the Delaware Valley, as local car dealer and team owner Roger Penske entered local hero Mark Donahue from Marcus Hook in the race. The grandstands were packed mostly with Delaware Valley fans, as USAC Champ Car racing was strong in the area, with the local ovals at Langhorne Speedway and Trenton Speedway drawing strong crowds; and our family sat in the top row at the S/F line for the race. [For what it's worth, I was also at the last Champ Car race at Langhorne in 1970, and last two at Trenton in 1979, before those tracks closed; and my ex-father-in law the late Jack Friedman was a mechanic on Rufus' '63 Indy 500-winning team, and has photos from Bobby Marvin's fatal crash at Puke Hollow in October of that year.]
In over a half-century of attending USAC Champ Car, CART, and IRL/IndyCar (as well as NASCAR and other series') races beginning with the `67 Indy 500, the last few laps after the late caution flag were among the most exciting I've ever seen. Joe Leonard shot past Donahue on the restart; and everybody was standing as Donahue hunted Leonard down. Since the infield was devoid of any real structures, we could clearly see the Tunnel Turn, when, on the last lap, Donahue retook the lead. To say that the crowd went wild would be quite the understatement.
Post race damn near had a disaster on pit lane: As the 6,000 gallon tractor-trailer tanker collecting the unused methanol was stopping at one of the pits, the tank overflowed and fuel sloshed forward onto the tractor. The driver hit the emergency brake and jumped out while it was still slowly rolling and dove over the pit wall, fearing a massive explosion. Even though it occurred several hundred yards from where we were sitting as we were packing up to leave, my late father reached over and  pushed me over, fearing a massive explosion. 
Little did I know at the time it was The Captain's first Champ Car/CART/IRL/IndyCar win, a feat he would repeat on the 50th anniversary when Josef Newgarden took the checkered flag at Mid-Ohio.  Discpad (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 1971 edits
Talk:Aviation Mall

message: The content of this article is as good as, and often better, than almost all similar Mall articles in the category Shopping malls in New York, and only a few of those articles are similarly tagged as being of questionable notability. As a part of the WikiProject Shopping Centers project, this mall is considered notable. Therefore, I am removing the  tag. Truthanado 23:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag

message: The list of tenants at the opening of the mall seems to be bouncing back and forth. When the mall opened in 1975, it had one large anchor, JCPenney and a smaller anchor within the original mall footprint, which was Denby's. Penney's original store was located on the extreme west end of the mall. Shortly after the opening of the mall a addition was constructed to the east end of the mall and this is where the Sears store was added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.152.21.253 (talk) 01:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mall Tenants 

message: Closures should be removed as they become increasingly more irrelevant quickly what do you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Incredible93 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closures
Talk:Grassy Key

message: I plan on adding to the history of Grassy Key, whether it is a major contributor to the development of the Keys, or the start of a major business. I also plan on adding to their economy information. There is a ton of information about Grassy Key's past history with bootlegging, pirates, and establishing a community. 
 
     Wilkinson, Jerry. "History of Grassy Key." Keys Historyhttp://www.keyshistory.org/GK-Grassy-Key-1.html. 29 Mar. 2017
 
     Bertelli, Brad. "Pirates’ History in the Keys is up for Debate." FlKeysNews http://www.flkeysnews.com/living/article79615392.html. 
          29 Mar. 2017
 
     Berg, Daniel. "Florida Shipwrecks" Aqua Explorers, Incorporated 1992.
 
     Turner, Gregg. A Short History of Florida Railroads.Arcadia Publishing 2003.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpfalz (talk • contribs) 12:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding information
Talk:Aymara Lupaca Reserved Zone

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.
===Discussion===
1. It isn't even a protected area any more.
2. The cleaning is done, though I only came here to sort out a clarification tag.
3. Thanks for all the fish! Chaosdruid (talk) 13:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: 1. It isn't even a protected area any more.
2. The cleaning is done, though I only came here to sort out a clarification tag.
3. Thanks for all the fish! Chaosdruid (talk) 13:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Ameloblastoma

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. Calmer Waters 17:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: In general, this article lacks any good references.  I'm working on changing that. --InsufficientData (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: A big messload of references are available at User:InsufficientData/Notes/Ameloblastoma.  I'm going to try working them into the article over time.  Bear with me (or assist! :)). --InsufficientData (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible References for this Article

message: In the article, in revision 148561533, the following reference was added:
 Zahid,Arsalan from Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Search as I did, I could not find any books named Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology written by Arsalan Zahid.  I'm guessing that the user erroneously included their own name (user making the edit was in fact named User:Arsalon Zahid and only made contributions to this article Special:Contributions/Arsalan_Zahid).  
Is this the book that's referred to?  
 Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
I'm not sure that this weird reference adds much to the article and is a source of confusion.  It also isn't scoped to any particular part of the article.  So I propose removing it.  This change also needs to be made to Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor and Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor.  
Any objections? --InsufficientData (talk) 20:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing Reference

message: I noticed the change you made to my user page notes (which will eventually get added to the main article - I'm still researching) in revision 260266251 and moved it over to the main article here. --InsufficientData (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yahoo Discussion Support Group for Ameloblastoma patients and caregivers link title
Talk:Marathon, Florida

message: Reverted section on Marathon library. It referenced positive information but was not a promo. There is no other mention of the library.
:I have added the section back, per WP:USCITIES, without the promotional content.  A photo would be nice.  Magnolia677 (talk) 15:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Trash (video game)

message: *https://archive.org/details/PC_Zone_163_January_2006/page/n87/mode/2up
*https://archive.org/details/Game_Land_2005-09-186/page/n65/mode/2up?q=%22inhuman+games%22
*https://archive.org/details/GameWorldNavigator_2005-02-093/page/n49/mode/2up?q=%22inhuman+games%22
*https://archive.org/details/PC_Zone_165_March_2006/page/n85/mode/2up?q=%22inhuman+games%22
*https://archive.org/details/PC_Zone_119_September_2002/page/n17/mode/2up?q=%22inhuman+games%22
*
JimmyBlackwing (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Teleki Library

message: I commented out the parts of the article that pertain more to Sámuel Teleki than the library itself. If there's useful information there, it can be merged into his biography article. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 19:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commented out

message: Super,
I hope you noticed the Romanian category is about present-day Romania, in which the library could not have been established, the Hungarian category has the same problem, hence I removed.(KIENGIR (talk) 07:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If we take that perspective, there are thousands of articles with these types of categories that should be deleted for historical accuracy. I prefer to interpret that the categories have a broader meaning. When the library was established, it was in Hungary, so the Hungarian establishments category does not need to be deleted. However, that library is now in Romania, so we also need a similar category for Romania. If the library for some reason became part of, let's say, Serbia, we would remove the Romanian category and add a Serbian one. I think the current version is fine and needs no changes. Super Ψ Dro 11:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your approach, however the categories are ill construed, even they have been done once by good faith, but our platform there are a plenty of errors done once by good faith, so just because thousands of categories are made possibly by mistake, it should not prevent us from repairing them.(KIENGIR (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really understand what do you mean here. I don't see the creation of those categories as mistakes, I think that kind of categories are useful. Super Ψ Dro 23:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not speak about the creation, I meant their erroneous definition.(KIENGIR (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories