lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard B. Fisher

message: This person's life doesn't seem all that worthy of note in an encyclopedia... - Brian Kendig 21:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was able to find some coverage on newspapers.com from the Philadelphia Inquirer that, combined with the high profile of Morgan Stanley, makes me think that the subject is likely notable. I don't think it establishes GNG on its own, but I think it's likely that additional newspaper coverage exists. That having been said, a good amount of the text currently in the article is not supported by its sole citation, hence the OR tag. Pinging , who readded this to the NPP queue. signed, Rosguill talk 01:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  Thanks for looking at that. I have reduced it.  scope_creepTalk 10:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New" article review and OR tag
Talk:The Man Without a Face

message: Just want to mention the interpretation of the sexual scenes in the book is wrong.  The sexual activity is an embrace between the two that overwhelms Chuck to the point of his achieving orgasm.  It is Chuck who takes it in that direction, and McLeod seems to have no interest whatever, either before or after, which bothers Chuck.  Sexual abuse doesn't figure into it, except in the minds of the freaked out mob that writes for Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.242.249.59 (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

message: In several interviews I saw with Gibson he claimed to have had a disfigured face that was corrected with plastic surgery prior to his becoming an actor. It should be mentioned in the article, and whether it's true. 
98.164.75.37 (talk) 07:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibson claimed to be the real man without a face.
Talk:Alias Jesse James

message: Many of the minor characters are included in the cast-listings. But they don't say who acted Miss Raskin, the secretary in the insurance company in the opening scenes. 86.148.131.107 (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who acted Miss Raskin? 

message: First, should Scatman Crothers be included as a "cameo"?  IMDB lists "Alias Jesse James" as his ninth role, but uncredited.  And his only possible Western role was an episode of "The Adventures of Jim Bowie" in 1957.  This was obviously just a regular film role for Crothers, NOT a cameo.  And second, should the cameo appearances be listed in order of their appearance, which would be O'Brian, Bond, Arness, Rogers, Parker, Davis, Cooper, Silverheels, and Crosby?  Elsquared (talk) 04:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion re: cameo appearances
Talk:The Valley of Decision

message: The hatnote says "For the Edith Wharton short story, see The Valley of Decision" but "The Valley of Decision" is in red. I do not know what is to be done, but the hatnote is useless. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote without a valid link
Talk:Pork Chop Hill (film)

message: The 7th Division fought two battles for Pork Chop Hill in 1953. The first was in April and is the battle depicted in the film. The second was a much larger and costlier battle in July. I made a minor correction in this article to reflect that.  131.238.92.62 12:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In 1959 it seems quite racist to show only one black man who happens to be the only coward.
I dont know if this is based on the book, or whether it was true at all. However I would be surprised to hear that in Korea there where lone black men fighting alonside whites.
At worst it is quite racist and at best it shows lack of tact and political correctness.Cgonzalezdelhoyo 06:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist??

message: If I remember correctly there were two black men in the movie. 
 At one point the one assigned to watch the frightened Franklin 
says to him
"I have a lot of intrest in what you do." meaning that his behavior on
the battlefield reflects on all blacks serving in the recently integrated armed forces. 70.230.246.159 (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Black Men

message: At the onset of the Korean War, integration of the armed forces had really only just begun.  An all-black regiment, the 24th Infantry, had been placed into combat and performed terribly, breaking and running at almost the first shot.   This is now commonly attributed to their poor training, equipment, support and leadership along with segregationist attitudes still prevalent,   Consequentially, the regiment was disbanded and their members scattered among other, mostly all-white units.  This is Private Franklin's position.  Once given real leadership and equal treatment, black soldiers went on to distinguish themselves as they do to this day.  ---- Dick Bulova  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.221.203 (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact of the Times 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pork Chop Hill →  – Suggest that the primary topic here is the event the film is about rather than the film, therefore I propose moving to the disambiguated title so the current title can be redirected to Battle of Pork Chop Hill as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 October 2022
Talk:Captain Newman, M.D.

message: great movie.. very funny.. Curtis and Scotti. 
though the film is based on somewhat true-life experiences, i always felt it actually alluded to Camp Lockett..located bout 50 miles east of San Diego, CA (San Diego County, Calif, USA). You even have a link/article re: same; did i do the link correctly??
It (the Camp) has quite a history.. Buffalo Soliders, and of course the WWII Convalescent hospital and Prisoner of War camp, both established in 1944. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a fantastic movie... a long-time favorite. Just yesterday TCM ran an original trailer, which promoted it as comedy laugh-riot, but so much of it is also very dark. Imagine taking the kids, thinking that it was gonna be something like "McHale's Navy." Anyhow... the film deserves a more comprehensive article. In my copious free time I'll try to assemble some noteworthy info.PurpleChez (talk) 13:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  somewhat LOCAL trivia
Talk:Mackenna's Gold

message: "J. Lee Thompson's ambitious variation on Erich von Stroheim's Greed" Clarityfiend 18:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source needed

message: I moved David M. Burns' Jan. 15, 2007 comments here:
As I have pointed out before, the date assigned to this film by Wikipedia (and numerous other sites)---1969---is doubtful at best.  How do I know this?  One, on a TV interview, Adam West commented that Julie Newmar was unavailable to play the role of Catwoman in the 1966 film Batman because she was committed to acting in Mackenna's Gold, which was filming at the same time.  Two, this site---http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=4122---confirms this.  I find it hard to believe that a film made in 1966 would either still be shooting three years later or had its release held up until that time.  
While this is not ironclad proof of 1966 as release date, it throws a great deal of doubt on 1969 as release date.
:No, there is not.  None at all.  I saw this when it came out.  Anyway, West is mistaken - he's confusing another season of the television show with the movie.  They had to replace Newmar with Kitt. HammerFilmFan (talk) 08:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: I vote to merge 6-18-67 into a new section on this article. 74.13.109.25 (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote no, as these are two separate and unique films that are notable on their own terms. No merge is necessary. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It is mentioned in the text to great length that Tiomkin was hired as the composer, but did he do anything or was every composition Quincy Jones? --Clibenfoart (talk) 10:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiomkin
Talk:Other People's Money

message: Nowhere in this article does it say whether this is a good date flick. Opinions from those who have seen it? 180.159.121.247 (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see IMDB mentioned specifically at WP:RS. Wikipedia articles about movies generally won't tell you about what is and isn't a good date flick. That's not really what wikipedia is for. (Unless lots of reliable sources are for some reason writing about whether or not it's a date flick.) Staecker (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Generally won't"?  You probably mean, our articles should NEVER use language like that.  What is or is not a "good" film is and always has been and always will be totally subjective and hence completely unencyclopedic.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 18:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Articles are supposed to reflect critical reviews. Relying on early reviews from a single source (rottentomatos) for a film that has obviously aged well is just plain bad editing. 114.84.141.82 (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's obviously aged well then feel free to add in some sourced commentary to that effect. Staecker (talk) 01:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good date flick?? oh that's funny.. that so subjective, personal.. ie, eg; speaking of Peck.. My date and i viewed Cape Fear, Silence of the Lambs, and Prince of Tides all w/in a year. 1991?? '92? Quite upsetting, but for us.. great acting. 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:2C0B:CE09:357C:5903 (talk) 00:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is what's wrong with wikipedia today
Talk:The Big Trail

message: The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) restored the 70mm version and tends to run it at least once a year. If given the opportunity, please do not miss this breath-taking masterpiece. The Big Trail is still recovering from a lifetime of disparagement by John Ford since Ford always wanted to take credit for John Wayne's career. You can find clips on youtube of Ford claiming that he discovered Wayne working as a prop boy in 1939 and cast him in Stagecoach when actually Walsh had done so a decade earlier wirh The Big Trail, arguably a much better movie in every way, as you'll realize as you behold it. Oddly enough, an actor's first major film surprisingly often can feature his or her best performance, probably having much to do with the excitement and electricity generated by doing it for the first time, and a strong case could be made that this is precisely what happens with John Wayne in this film.  Under the great Walsh's deft direction while shooting in North America's most beautiful locations, Wayne is as charismatic as any actor ever recorded on film.  The ensemble supporting characters always ballyhooed when regarding Stagecoach is largely already present and accounted for a decade earlier, and exceeded by a wide margin, in The Big Trail. The gambler portrayed by John Carradine in Stagecoach is more fully realized in The Big Trail in the person of a vicious gambler blithely competing with Wayne for the extremely beauteous Marguerite Churchill. Tyrone Power Sr., the great actor who fathered our Tyrone "The Mark of Zorro" Power, gives us one of the cinema's most amazing villains, the bearded "bull-whacker" Red Flack, whose look and voice were so strikingly intense that his whole persona was quickly co-opted and converted into Bluto, Popeye's pugnacious enemy in the Fleischer cartoons. Tyrone Power Sr. was anything but a cartoon, however; the uniquely realistic ground-in filth of his garb and nuanced performance as a creature from hell adds up to a believability that startles, grabbing the modern viewer by the throat. Trocadero Thunder (talk) 13:51, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Big Trail'' at the [[Museum of Modern Art]] 

message: ... and he has him play a part in one of his first talkies: SALUTE, as early as 1929. One glance at Wikipedia would have told you that. Not that Ford wasn't a liar of the first rate, but he really did discover John Wayne.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.181.81.208 (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Ford did discover Wayne
Talk:Four Tank-Men and a Dog

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Czterej pancerni i pies. —Nightstallion (?) 09:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support it if you wanted to list it on WP:RM. --Qviri (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support as well and have put it on WP:RM. Misza13 T C E 12:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To Czterej pancerni i pies - perhaps. To Czterej Pancerni i Pies or Czterej Pancerni I Pies - never. Take note of the correct capitalization. Halibutt 12:55, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Are you sure it was rerun only until 1989? I know for a fact I watched it as a child in Poland and I was born in that year. So the question is how sure are you that they only reran it until 1989?Gunter viezenz 10:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I was born in 1990 and I remember watching the series when I was 4/5.. so the rerun date is definitely wrong. However, I'm not editing due to the fact that, put simply, I have no idea. We probably need someone older who can remember when it stopped airing, or something. Ikki the Fox Breeder 05:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Million Dollar Hotel

message: This film was not written by Bono, but written by another person after a concept.  Watch the credits on the film if you think otherwise. 86.17.247.135 02:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written by Bono? 

message: heard a few interviews with Wim / Bono on the subject of this film... in early days they always talk about this being a sci-fi film, original title "the billion dollar hotel" there's an interview on KCRW pertaining to the project  any other info on this theme?
User:callumalden  —Preceding undated comment added 18:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  a Sci-Fi Film
Talk:The Three Musketeers (1993 film)

message: I added the fact that this film could qualify as an uchronia, as it wildly alters French History, to the point of being unintentionally hilarious to french audiences. (Richelieu trying to assassinate Louis XIII ? Come on !) Dumas took many liberties with History, but this is pure fiction. Wedineinheck 10:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the expression "For Christ's sake", you feel the need to "bleep" the word sake?!? The commandment is about not taking the Lord's name in vain, you know; "sake" is really very rarely considered "bleep"-worthy. HTH! -- CRConrad (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Uchronia

message: "The Three Musketeers was mostly shot in Perchtoldsdorf, Austria, where De Mornay attended high school and college."
I see this has been in the article since August 2008 (!), but that can't possibly be true? Of course now it's all over the Internet, copied from here I guess (or it was copied here from IMDb maybe) Adam Bishop (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perchtoldsdorf
Talk:Lethal Weapon 4

message: where was this filmed? 217.207.97.66 (talk) 09:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location filmed
Talk:The Lawless Frontier

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  01:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Hell Town (TV series)

message: I have deleted all references to a film entitled HELLTOWN, as it has nothing to do with the tv series under discussion on this page.  In addition, the film HELLTOWN is a secondary title for a film properly known as BORN TO THE WEST, and the majority of information previously listed here regarding the film was wildly inaccurate, including a wrong year of release, wrong director credit, and lack of reference to the actual title.  Monkeyzpop 06:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:'Neath the Arizona Skies

message: Currently, the infobox lists only John Wayne & Sheila Terry; while the pictured poster shows only John Wayne & George Hayes. Shouldn't the infobox show either Wayne & Hayes or the whole cast? I believe the Wiki guidelines for movie infoboxes prefer listing the names on the poster. 
Interestingly, this infobox already uses "plainlist" for the list of stars.  
I doubt this noteworthy enough for inclusion in the article, but John Wayne appears twice in the opening credits -- first, in the title credit: "John Wayne in 'Neath the Arizona Skies"; and again in the cast list: 
:John Wayne
::Sheila Terry
:::Shirley Jane Rickert
::::Jack Rockwell
:::::Yakima Canutt
::::::Weston Edwards
:::::::Buffalo Bill Jr.
::::::::Phil Keefer
I also doubt that the cast list indenting, which I have tried to reproduce, and no character information are noteworthy either. I believe this format of the credits, although unusual today, was normal for the time period.  -- 99.120.130.167 (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting credits & infobox
Talk:Reap the Wild Wind

message: I was slightly annoyed to read in the article that John Wayne dies in the film. It's a significant spoiler and anyone who hasn't seen the film before will be deprived of the surprise. Mayorstreet (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

message: "Rumors circulate and prices of the cargo of the Southern Cross go up and down wildly, leaving Steve to suspect a wreck is planned."
I never understood that part. How could anyone know about this in advance, except for the pirates themselves?--80.141.201.229 (talk) 16:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were there any prophets involved?
Talk:Angel and the Badman

message: If I have read the plot information correctly it says that Angel and the Badman was filmed in Monument Valley. that is not correct. The movie was filmed in Sedona, Arizona as is evidenced by the unique rock formation in most of the scenes. Specifically, Coffee Pot Rock in the background of the town, Bell Rock in the background of many scenes looking from the Worth's house, and others. I have been to Sedona many times and can supply pictures of these rock formations if necessary.
Frederick G. Schieffer
24 October 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgschieffer (talk • contribs) 03:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shooting Location
Talk:3 Godfathers

message: the train scenes.. the railway, etc were shot in Owens Valley... those snow-capped peaks in distance are the Sierras. No, the line wasnt built for the movie, it had been there quite awhile. You folks even have page re: same.. the Carson and Colorado Railway.. did i do that link correctly?? 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:93A:A276:7DA4:A225 (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  the carson-colorady line.. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 3 Godfathers (1948 film) →  – WP:MISPLACED JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 December 2023
Talk:Sands of Iwo Jima

message: Mention why there are no black people in the movie. Jidanni 16:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, this isn't different from most war films from that era. Second, according to Desegregation#Desegregation in the military, army units didn't become integrated until the Korean War. Clarityfiend 22:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black people 

message: Just my opinion- the death of Wayne's character at the end of the film was an essential event  that highlighted the fact good men died at Iwo Jima, not just the extras or minor characters of life, for there were none there of that type.
71.114.163.55  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 05:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death of Wayne's Character

message: I want to change the last bit regarding Stryker's letter, the letter was left incomplete and Stryker only managed to tell his some some of the things he wanted to, the original transcript seems to indicate the he had wrote everything that he wanted to say.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.95.170.99 (talk) 07:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letter  

message: Is this the only movie in which John Wayne (e.g. his character) get shot and dies?
:Not hardly pilgrim. This gives a list of his screen deaths (from all causes). He gets fatally shot in The Shootist, The Cowboys, and The Fighting Seabees. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  only movie with death of Wayne's character? 

message: I haven't found a good source yet, but it would not be impossible, given Wayne's fame and the participation of the three remaining flag raisers, that this was the actual flag. In the movie, these three actually raise the flag. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE  23:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag authenticity

message: In the movie, one of the marines who landed at Iwo Jima like to read. He got killed early in the battle. As he falls down, the camera zooms in on one of the books he held in his pocket: "Our Hearts Were Young and Gay". I guess that in 1949, when the movie was released, the book was still popular and well known in the general public. Today, besides by reading the wikipedia article about the book, it's harder to guess what the film maker wanted to show with that scene. AugustinMa (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Hearts Were Young and Gay