Talk:Subrata Roy

message: This page should not be speedy deleted because it is very helpful and reliable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.82.71 (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: In the section Controversies there are two different allegations 1. 2G Spectrum Scam and Contempt of Court & 2. Securities and Exchange Board of India Ban
Both cases are still under judiciary and nothing has been proved yet. 
In contempt of the court case Senior Advocate K K Venugopal said on behalf of the CBI that: “Evidence found till now is insufficient” Reference: http://post.jagran.com/2g-case-cbi-examines-radia-others-in-allegation-against-sahara-1310403191 .
In case of SEBI ban, Supreme Court of india on 15th July 2011 granted a stay on market regulator SEBI’s order of June 23, 2011 that ordered Sahara Group companies to return the money raised through optionally fully convertible debentures (OFCD). Reference: http://profit.ndtv.com/news/show/sc-directs-sahara-to-approach-sat-against-sebi-order-on-ofcds-164375
So according to me it is unfair to write about these Allegations/Controversies on a biography when nothing has been proved yet. I would like to request all contributors to put your views forward on this issue.--Mukulsaurabh (talk) 04:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it right to add such Allegations/Controversies on a biography when nothing has been proved yet.  

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: copyvio sources were listed as references. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —SpacemanSpiff 13:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: In the page it says he started his journey with Sahara in 1978 ie he was only 30yrs old at that time. Further the same section comments that at that point he had an experience of 32yrs in Business Development. To me it seems like a typo, can someone correct that?115.254.25.18 (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experience 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Mother with Subrata Roy Sahara.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Qshop-logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I've now protected this article. I've also rolled back the most recent edit. This is NOT to say that the version that I've put it on is an 'approved' version, but the last edit, though containing some sources, was more likely to breach WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. You need to find a balance between not reporting it at all, and completely overloading the article. GedUK  12:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Let me know if there's anything I missed. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection 

message: Hello, I'm Anup and I've boldly deleted the controversy section. The controversy section included these texts,
*I'm not sure, how the first line could be declared a controversy, anybody explain? "The wedding of his sons Seemanto Roy and Sushanto Roy, held during February, 10-14, 2004 in Sahara,  Lucknow, is said to have cost $128 million, one of the most expensive ever." It is absolutely an original research to be a controversy (Check references above). Hence removed.
*The later part is deleted for WP:BLPCRIME cause. Discuss it here if anybody feels the contents removed by me, should be re-instated (Please review WP:BLPCRIME & WP:STRUCTURE first). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. As the person who frequently restored the controversy section I thought I should comment. Thank you Anup for pointing out those things and taking action. Now I am aware of the crime policy etc. I would like to agree with the removal you have made. Thanks again, BethNaught (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: Subrata Roy is currently imprisoned in India <Br> http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/04/india-sahara-chief-subrata-roy-supreme-c-idINDEEA2303F20140304 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sahara-boss-Subrata-Roy-to-sleep-on-floor-in-Tihar-eat-jail-food/articleshow/31418180.cms
63.247.160.139 (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2014 imprisonment 

message: Subrata Roy is often referred to as a billionaire in the gossip and news media but is not listed by Forbes as one of India's billionaires and is not on Forbes list of billionaires (India).  http://profit.ndtv.com/news/cheat-sheet/article-who-is-subrata-roy-10-point-cheat-sheet-382110 <Br>
http://www.forbes.com/india-billionaires/
63.247.160.139 (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a billionaire

message: Subroto Roy arrested by police on the order of Supreme Court of India and was sent to Tihar jail . As on date 07 March 2014 he is still in jail and his bail plea is refused by Supreme Court. He is arrested for evading the SC appearance and failing to return the money to investors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.87.116.215 (talk) 08:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrest Details===

message: requesting straight-forward changes like grammar, spelling, formatting
122.170.1.238 (talk) 06:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --ElHef (Meep?) 13:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2014 

message: The Sahara Group has thanked the Supreme Court for lifting the freeze on its moveable and immovable assets so that it can raise the Rs 10,000 crore for part payment of dues, but also said it had repaid the bulk of money owed to investors.http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/sahara-group-thanks-apex-court-for-asset-de-freeze/1/206942.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.184.2.10 (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sahara Good deeds

message: The summary contains the text:
  In 2014, Sahara was briefly jailed and then released on bail for contempt of court in a case involving alleged money laundering by the Sahara Group.
I assume that was meant to read "In 2014, Roy was briefly jailed..." or "In 2014, Subrata Roy was briefly jailed...". Could someone else who's more sure fix it?
superman (talk) 08:39, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in summary 

message: Hello Wiki,
Hope you are going good. I have just seen this page online and was shocked to see that Wiki is showing the Biography of a Living person that Wiki should never do at all as per its policies. This is an ongoing case and by posting such things online about a Living person seems to be threatening. Also the sources I found over here are news articles and the stories written in it gives the detail about this case but I don't think that it gives any output to the users. Seriously, saying its a confusing case because sometimes court says that we have kept subrata roy in jail so that he can give the money and here on Wikipedia you say that Sahara India Pariwar if Fraud. I have confusion, actually the allegations have been imposed on Sahara Real Estates and Sahara Life Insurance then whats the use of Sahara India Pariwar in it. As per my knowledge this page must get remove. Do reply me what so ever will be your decision.
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.96.248.251 (talk) 11:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst an usefulness Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Subrata Roy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006030252/http://www.indiantelevisionacademy.com/site/awards_hhita_details_new.php?year=2007 to http://www.indiantelevisionacademy.com/site/awards_hhita_details_new.php?year=2007
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified