Talk:Addai of Edessa

message: Same person 10:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Thaddeus is in Eusebius' account, while Addai is in the Syriac. Other accounts have Thomas as the protagonist. There is a better way of handling this. — Gareth Hughes 20:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thaddeus and Addai are the same cognate word in different languages for the same person "of Edessa" (so too is Addeus).  You cannot just delete merge tags - you can disagree with a proposed merger, but removing the tags shows bad faith.  15:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The names are not cognates: there's absolutely no evidence for that. Merging the articles would be a bad idea, because you would be merging features from different manuscript traditions. Both articles need to be rewritten to include better scholarship. Both articles and Doctrine of Addai are in a terrible state. Now, I could see a state where mention of the Thaddeus character could be made in a section of the Addai article, including the expanded history in later Greek literature. However, merging the articles as they are would create the impression that the two characters are the same. This would be a whitewash of the manuscript tradition. — Gareth Hughes 15:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But the two characters are the same.  Claimed to be one of the 70/72, sent by Thomas to Abgar in Edessa.  says Addai is simply the Syriac for the [Latinised Greek] Thaddeus.  The fact that the Syriac "Doctrine" and Eusebius use different stories for the reply of Jesus to Abgar is enough to justify recording both, but in the same article; one or other may be correct, or both may be wrong, but they are talking about the same person and so should be in one article.  18:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the 1907 Catholic Encyclopedia is wrong. There is no evidence that the two names are the same. The Syriac Doctrina Addaei has Addai as its protagonist, while Eusebius has Thaddeus. Two sources (including Egeria) tell the same story with Thomas as the protagonist. The different manuscript traditions are quite different in their telling of the tale. Some people have perceived that Addai and Thaddeus are same name because they are both used as names of the protagonist and they have a few letters in common. However, Eusebius seems to be making connexions with Levantine traditions of Thaddeus, while Doctrina Addaei draws on Mesopotamian material (possibly from Adiabene). Any statement of complete identity between the two would be misleading. As I have said, it might be appropriate to have the articles merged, but I believe that merging the articles now would create the kind of misunderstanding that comes from a passing knowledge of the tale, like that in the Catholic Encyclopedia. — Gareth Hughes 18:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Thaddeus of Edessa]] and [[Addai]]

message: An editor has suggested that this article may benefit from an appropriate infobox, or the current infobox could be updated. The template to use is .
===Eusebius of Caesarea===
I have reverted this page to the previous version to remove the irrelevant comments about Eusebius of Caesarea.  --Sophroniscus 16:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now merged. werldwayd (talk) 03:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussions in Addai

message: I have reverted this page to the previous version to remove the irrelevant comments about Eusebius of Caesarea.  --Sophroniscus 16:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eusebius of Caesarea

message: Of course this should be merged with Thaddeus of Edessa -- they are the same person.  What would be the contrary argument? Languagehat (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now merged. werldwayd (talk) 03:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: I think undue importance is being given to the healing tale and the Doctrine of  Addai within article of Thaddeus of Edessa. I think it would be preferable to give a resume of the tale and forward all the rest of the controversial material the historical veracity of which is challenged by many to the separate  Doctrine of  Addai page werldwayd (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Healing of King Abgar and Doctrine of Addai

message: I think if the approximate date and place of birth and death would elevate a lot of the confusion between  the Apsotle and the Disciple. werldwayd (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Approximate birth and death date of Thaddeus of Edessa

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thaddeus of Edessa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609044215/http://www.saintpatrickdc.org/ss/0805.htm to http://www.saintpatrickdc.org/ss/0805.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why all documents of the apostles of Jesus Christ didn't recorded? Other scrolls are hidden why? 41.216.87.40 (talk) 09:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you trying to say? Str1977 (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Twelve disciples of Christ