Talk:Din-i Ilahi

message: Why is it sad that this cult had no followers?  Is that an encyclopedic term?
:I agree , I think "sadly should be removed".:
::I agree, too. Do you think we should get some kind of discussion forum going to see how we can actually go about editing the article?
:::It seems someone has opened a new article Din-e-Ilahi. i am new here, so hat should we do about naming, which one is correct? the other article is better written in my opinion.18.252.6.149 03:02, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sadly

message: First it says this school does not recognise gods. Then it talks about God. --Againme (talk) 23:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Britannica confirms the God mention. I fixed the contradiction by deleting the "no gods" claim.--Againme (talk) 03:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Does anyone know whether the Central Asian ancestor mentioned in the quote ("...like his Central Asian ancestor, he believed in astronomy and astrology...") refers to Timur or Ulugh Beg? I am going to change it to clarify that it is Timur, as that seems likeliest, but it could really be either, since Ulugh Beg was very famous for his work in astronomy.  EllipsisElegy (talk) 18:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Central Asian ancestor" 

message: * 1. The article says "Dīn-i Ilāhī appears to have survived Akbar according to the Dabestān-e Mazāheb of Mohsin Fani. However, the movement was suppressed by penalty and force after his death and was totally eradicated by Aurangzeb, a task made easier by the fact that the religion never had more than 19 adherents.[8][4]" - In the source number 8 there is no about the destruction of the sect by Aurangazeb, the source number 4 is without pages and its volume is too large to view.
* 2. The article card says "Defunct Likely 1606", but the article says "In the 17th century, an attempt to re-establish the Dīn-i-Ilāhī was made by Shah Jahan's eldest son, Dara Shikoh,[9] but any prospects of an official revival were halted by his brother, Aurangzeb, who executed him[10]", Judging by the article Dara Shikoh he was executed in 1659, but source 10 has no pages to check.
* 3. In source 8 it is written that there were no more than 19 people in the sect, and in the preamble of the article "Members 21; also there were several influenced followers".
Vyacheslav84 (talk) 19:21, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Din-i Ilahi →  – It's written that way many times throughout the page itself, also cf. Sirr-i-Akbar or Kitáb-i-Aqdas etc. MagnusRegnumAntichristiAdvenit (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 16 September 2023

message: Din-i Ilahi means religion of god. Din-i Allahi means religion of the God. Are not these different? Akbar believed in the oneness of God, but was tolerant of polytheism. literal translations should be done. 117.213.57.75 (talk) 07:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Din-i Ilahi is not Din-i Allahi