lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Luna 9

message: Are the pictures & panoramas Luna-9 took available anywhere?
* The panorama photos can be found at http://mentallandscape.com/C_CatalogMoon.htm which is also listed at [] --ZweiMeterBratwurst (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: February 66 is given in the article, however I have seen JANUARY elsewhere. Comments anyone? --MacRusgail 20:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: moved by Gaff for clarity: "In response to the earlier comment on whether it was January or February: the launch was on January 31, 1966, the lunar landing was on February 3, 1966.  My source is the book "Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration" by Brian Harvey. NelsonLB 04:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan or Feb? 

message: The surface image has a NASA copyright.  Obviously, that is not right.  Mdrejhon 15:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From a quick Google image search, it looks like NASA re-distributed the pics, or at least put them on the internet.--DiogenesTheHobo 03:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surface image is not NASA 

message: Have any modern lunar imagers (eg, Clementine) been able to see this, on the lunar surface?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:E414:3A01:2C96:2D8F:C0DB:B506 (talk) 05:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has  it been seen since? 

message: Is there any information about the early development of this craft?  This seems to be from a time where the space race was in the public eye. DVAzfc (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   Early Development? 
Talk:Bill Swerski's Superfans

message: In one of the episodes linked at the bottom of the page (the one with Jordan), the sign in the window says "Every Sunday Bill Swernski's Super Fans on WCBM" Is there any other evidence that says that Swernski should be Swerski, other than that's what it sounds like they're saying? How would one go about changing the name of an article?
Mlaird1 01:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: normally culminating in a uniform toast to "Da Bearss" and "Da Bullss" (and on a few occasions "Da Sox" or "Da Cubs")
Despite baseball being arguably the most popular sport in Chicago the Chicago Cubs and Chicago White Sox were not mentioned on any of the episodes.
Uh, yes... they were. Remember the 1995 John Goodman episode with Dan Aykroyd and Brian Dennehy stepping in?
Well...which is it?--Mount Molehill (talk) 09:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cubs and White Sox 

message: I think this is a notable skit although the current article does not really demonstrate notability. This article needs to be sourced more properly with inline citations.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  23:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 

message: Removed "(In reality, the Giants won 31-3)", as, in reality, Mike Ditka never played against the entire NY Giants football team by himself, as these jokes invariably suggest. I expect this will not engender controversy.50.147.26.108 (talk) 03:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ditka vs the giants 

message: In the History section, I think the reference to Dan Aykroyd's character is mistaken.  I think the character's name is "Maimway", which is a pun, based on the facts that his company's productions were inherently dangerous to consumers.  For example, his Halloween costume line included "the Invisible Pedestrian", consisting of an all-black coverall, and "the Human Torch", a collection of oily rags with safety pins, and a cigarette lighter.
TheBaron0530 (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainway" or "Maimway"? 

message: Requesting a table listing all the SNL episodes in which the sketch appeared. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list
Talk:Record

message: 66.167.138.211 03:38, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 66.167.138.211 03:41, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone else have issues with the pruning I did for this article? 

message: This page has ballooned a bit like most DAB pages do over time.  I'm pruning it down in line with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):
*Removing many references to articles whose titles do contain the word Record but which are unlikely ever to be linked simply as Record in error
*Removing all information not needed for disambiguation
*Un-linking all words that do not disambiguate Record
If anyone disagrees with any of my edits, feel free to restore any item but please leave me a note here to let me know why. Cheers, ~ Veledan • Talk 21:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I seem to have been reverted but I trust that was an error and I have reverted back to my version.  Disambiguation pages should not contain any content (or links) more than is required to disambiguate the various meanings. They are not for general browsing. Please see the link I provided in my original edit summary, or in the above message, and bring it here for discussion before reverting again. Many thanks ~ Veledan • Talk 19:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation & tidying 

message: *I vote Merge: I don't see any reason why record (administrative) needs its own disambiguation page. There's room for those sub-listings as well. Oicumayberight 03:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I'm merging the audio entries into Gramophone record because, after all, an album is, in post-78 use, a long-playing phonograph record, which Wikipedia calls a Gramophone record, and in 78 RPM usage, a record is a single disk, not an album of disks. I don't believe the word "record" was used to mean reel-to-reel tape or an audio cassette. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging audio entries 

message: Nahian 103.140.234.246 (talk) 02:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiktok logo name Nahian
Talk:Analog Science Fiction and Fact

message: The November 1985 cover isn't free, and would need a FUR specifically for this article, which I'm not sure we could produce.  We do have several free images already; do we have to have one from the 80s?  Without a good justification  I think the picture will have to go. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 13:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging , who added the image. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 16:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Last I checked these things, every non-free image needs a rationale for each article in which it appears, so until/unless there's one for this image in this article, it has to go. Personally I'd quite like to see an '80s cover in the article, but not enough to spend the time writing a rationale -- that's really up to the person who wants to place it here. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 1985 cover 

message: The redirect Astounding has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Duckmather (talk) 20:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Astounding]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nina Wang

message: She was born in Shanghai in 1937 and in 1955 she married Teddy Wang, whom she had dated since 1948 (when she was 13).
Eh? If she was born in 1937, then she would have been 11 when they started dating. Which figure is wrong? -- Lucky13pjn 23:30, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
I fixed this, she was born in 1937.  - Vinny
did she own 100% of chinachem before her battle with her father in law?,, some magazines said she diversified her husband's share of chinachem....Snob 02:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't add up 

message: The Forbes Article says "The kidnappers disposed of the car and took Wang out to sea on a sampan, a small Chinese boat. They dumped him, gagged and bound, into the sea. His body has never been found. "
I think that would be of interest. It should be worked into the main article. --Cngodles 13:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbes Article 

message: I received an email today so typical of the infamous Nigerian scams, pointing directly to this article. Beware people! If you receive mail pointing this way, record the email details and send it off to Interpol for them to track.
Wildlife Hunter 23:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beware 

message: I hereby propose that Teddy Wang be merged into this article.  Essentially, Teddy is much less notable than Nina; any news article involving him revolves around her, which means he lacks the independent third-party mentions required to establish notability on his own.  A recent AfD on a similar article ended with this result. --jonny-mt(t)(c)Tell me what you think! 16:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Anthony Sampson

message: We need a disambiguation page for "Seven Sisters" -- the phrase and the book.  currently links to dungeons and dragons characters. --Pmeisel 00:02, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am trying to expand this article, mainly focusing on the differences between this book and other accounts (books and otherwise) of Mandela's life and South Africa throughout this period. Any comments or suggestions are appreciated on the peer review page: "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Mandela:_The_Authorised_Biography" BillMasen 17:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mandela: The Authorised Biography]]

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Pete Clifton

message: I'm wondering if this should be merged with BBC News Online, as other than the Directors-General he appears to be the only member of the BBC who isn't a presenter with their own article. I haven't put a merge tag on it because I'm open to other suggestions and opinions on this. Thryduulf 01:04, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FWIW, Pete Clifton writes that he himself wrote the initial article... Apus apus 16:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And we should be clear: Wikipedia discourages autobiographical edits, but there's no policy violated, here. Double-checking the text would make sense, of course. In fact this article could use quite a bit of love, as it's not up to Wikipedia's standards in its current state. -Harmil 17:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He did say he wrote the article.  He says thet Wikipedia had the wrong information about who had his current job - in other words there wasn't an entry for him but for his predecessor; as a result he write a "couple of paragraphs" about himself.  In other words, the article.  Regardless of whether or not he wrote it, I question whether this entry deserves to exist.  I know it has gone through a proposal for deletion before but, let's face it, who is he?  Is he notable enough for an entry?  I think not. 87.127.44.154 18:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article goes back to December 2004.  If he created it, he did so with, as he called it, "incorrect information" which needed to be corrected.  I can see correcting an article about yourself if it contains objectively incorrect data.  If he added text to the effect that we editors should all be in awe of him as a professional, okay then I might have an issue with him.  At this point, nah.  And he owned up to it.  Denimadept 19:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

text:  asking 'who is he?' is rather odd - he's the editor of one of the most important and heavily-used websites in the world, and that clearly makes him notable - indeed, for him not to have an entry would be odd. Billthom 19:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Yeah, so he did write the original article himself. There doesn't seem to be anything in the article that warrants those three tags, though. The article is factual and reasonably well-written. I suggest we remove all tags. Junes 19:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags useful? 

message: Apologies, I'm a novice at this but how does one remove "He seems to be a pretty nice kind of guy- recently quickly attoning for a daft error the BBC made re a story about internal edits to Wikipedia"? It's on the article but I can't see it in the edit page?
:It was removed.--FeralOink (talk) 04:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Adolescent Radioactive Black Belt Hamsters

message: I pulled this material from the article:
While the parodies following tended to play off specific plot incidents (generally from the more universally seen TV cartoon), ARBBH began with an introduction that was a loose play on the TMNT origin, after which it pretty much took its own path. 
It's probably good material but the comment  other parodies doesn't necessarily belong in this article.  The material I pulled needs some rewrite, but I can't figure out how to improve it.
:I disagree about it being good material. Namely, most of the TMNT parodies and knockoffs came (and went) before the TMNT cartoon hit the air. Geriatric Gerbils, Kung Fu Koalas, etc etc etc.99.149.164.211 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: The art and writing is described either as independent or hard to follow. 
I've never heard it described that way.  I was a big fan of the book at the time it was being published.  I could see how some people would say that, but I'm not sure it belongs here.
--Jczorkmid 11:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence doesn't really mean anything to me; what does it mean to describe art or writing as 'independent'?  I'm dropping it. ike9898 20:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this add anything? 
Talk:V6 PRV engine

message: "DeLorean" is spelled without a space. I've made this change in the article. Unimath (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DeLorean spelling

message: The Z-Type was just Renault's internal designation for the PRV. --Pc13 (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Renault Z-Type engine]]
Talk:Burton Folsom, Jr.

message: Anyone know how to move the history page to the new article Burton W. Folsom, Jr.?
:Well, if there weren't already something there, you could use the "Move this Page" feature; that would do the trick. Since there is something there now, you will need the assistance of an admininistrator. The easiest thing might be to revert the text back to this page, then put Burton W. Folsom, Jr. up for speedy deletion, then, after its deleted and thereofore empty, you can use "Move this Page". - Nat Krause 02:49, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Anastasio Somoza García

message: I thought the "son of a bitch" quote was in reference to Rafael Leónidas Trujillo. Anyone know for sure? Richard Cane 03:08, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote accuracy 

message: "Though the Somozas were ruthless and exploitative dictators..."
That may or may not be true, but it doesn't sound very neutral, IMHO. Josh 02:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Why has this section been deleted?  The info shoud be easily verifiable and I found it informative and helpful in understanding the person. J. Peterka 20:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the deletion. I find unless a wholesale change is explained it's best to just restore it. Snocrates 20:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Early political career

message: It has been stated that the body of Somoza is situated in a mausaleum in Florida, yet his son is interred with him in Nicaragua.
Sorry but I don't see the sense or the link in this.
Can someone please clarify?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.165.132 (talk) 09:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of body 

message: I've come back to read this article a couple times over the past few days, and noticed the assassination section has been changed...yet every time I've read it, there has been NO REFERENCE to Somoza's assassination - nothing about it in the article. Considering that he WAS assassinated, and that there was purportedly CIA involvement... perhaps there should be a mention? Or will that just be 'mysteriously deleted'?... MisplacedFate1313 (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's talk about ASSASSINATION... 

message: Does anyone know which religion (if any) Somoza adhered to? I know his sons were Catholic (Anastasio Somoza Debayle mentioned being a Catholic in his memoirs), but Bernard Diederich's Somoza and the Legacy of U.S. Involvement in Central America says that the elder Somoza had never been a practicing Catholic; complicating matters further, John Gunther's Inside Latin America, does not list a religion, but notes that Somoza was the only Central American president who was "not a Catholic." Josh (talk) 08:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Somoza's religion
File talk:Barlach Magdeburger Ehrenmal.jpg

message: Only loosely related to the above, but in order to show that also "outdoor" photographs of "buildings" can be copyright-infringing in (some) droit d'auteur countries.
The case is famous, it concerns the EU parliament building in Brussels: presently the architect of the building, advocating "droit d'auteur", prohibits any use of images of that building (photographs, logos based on it,...), e.g. by the EU administration on their letterheads.
This led to court proceedings, which until now have been won by the architect. And EU officials complaining themselves for having been insufficiently cauteous at time when they drew up the contract with the architect.
Nobody that hasn't been there really knows what the building looks like. Television (in Belgium at least), resorts to an areal photograph of a large part of Brussels, where the building is more or less visible in a corner. Sometimes interviews with EU politicians are taken so close to the mirror-glass facades of the building, that it could appear as any other modern building.
For explanation of "droit d'auteur", see e.g. Intellectual rights and Moral rights.
--Francis Schonken 14:16, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which building are you refferring to? The Buildings of the European Parliament article hosts photos from various images of various EU parliament buildings in Brussels, and there is a relevant category in wikicommons and all photos seem to be accepted as free (if they weren't wikicommons would have banished them). --Michalis Famelis (talk) 11:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An anecdote
Talk:Juan Manuel Álvarez (Glendale train crash)

message: Is it just me, or is the sentence speculating on Alvarez's ethnic identity unnecessary?  Aion 03:21, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Says in the article that he was convicted of murder and acquitted of "trainwrecking". So he was convicted of causing the deaths, but not wrecking the train. Actually, real life makes no sense, but the article should still reflect real life, or maybe I am missing a detail.Mcsew2k (talk) 15:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "convicted of causing" the train wreck accurate? 

message: The article said that police said "recent investigations" had shown that Alvarez may not have been intending suicide. First of all, the edit that added that sentence was made more than a year ago, so I changed the word "recent" to "following." Second, I had not heard this information and I did not see it sourced, so I posted a comment on the editor's talk page and also added a verify tag to the article. If anyone can verify that info, please remove the verify tag, post the source, and let me know on my talk page so I can copy the info to the Glendale train crash article (unless you want to copy it yourself). Thanks! cluth 02:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a little searching and found this blog post. Unfortunately, the two articles it links to (one from KCAL and the other from the L.A. Times) both result in 404 errors--probably because they are old links. The blog post seems to be a quote from the AP story, so I now can believe that this article is factually accurate. Since it could still benefit from additional sourcing, I'm going to leave the tag up. I will also search Google for some of the key words in the blog post and also check the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine... cluth 03:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I probably should do all this work before I post these comments. I just found what I was looking for here. I'll update the article accordingly. It could probably still use some updating to reflect any further developments in the case as of now... cluth 03:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Following investigations 

message: Yeah, you can call me lazy for not finding it out on my own, but... the article doesn't say if this guy was the engineer operating the train, or just someone who did some scheming and plotting to make the train crash. Would be a useful addition to the article. 69.65.232.61 00:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who? 

message: I have located a newspaper article that calls Alvarez a handyman.  I will include that job title in the article but leave I to others if they wish to modify the "laborer" title in the infobar. 173.75.117.35 (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What kind of laborer?

message: 1979 or 1976? The bio box says one and the article says the other. mdclxvi (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthyear?
Talk:Zombie Nation (musician)

message: My CD inlay mentions a guy called "Mooner", next to "Splank!". Who is this and why isn't he mentioned here in the article, not even as a former member of the team? 85.5.58.89 (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two producers?

message: The currently referenced link for Wake's first use of Kernkraft 400 is simply a recap of the game mentioned.  Here's a link that actually includes a firsthand account of the song being played at that game: http://www.playerhatersball.com/2007/07/skip-prossers-first-year-at-wake-forest.html  However, I'm guessing Wikipedia's policy on blogs would prevent the link being used as a reference.  Still, it would be good to have a better source than the current one. Theharmonyguy (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kernkraft 400 History

message: "The first Zombie Nation Record contained the song "Kernkraft 400", which is considered one of the most famous songs of electronic dance music." - The only thing Zombie Nation can be considered famous for is for stealing the original song from David Whittaker. And anyone who thinks this song is one of the most famous songs in the whole electronic dance music scene needs to get his head examined :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.73.40 (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There are NO sources for that. --The O o (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Popularity

message: Isn't Kernkraft 400 the techno song by Zombie Nation, instead of vice versa?
:I thought so :S, But I guess we are both wrong, check the link --x1987x 21:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name confusion

message: No one covers the fact that Zombie nation was taken to court over having plagiarized Kernkraft 400 24.23.236.186 (talk) 12:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plaigarism 
Talk:Isaac Fanous

message: `This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Isaac Fanous.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 03:54, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)