Talk:North Carolina Tar Heels

message: The Dwight Jones link is the wrong Dwight Jones.
THIS MAY NOT BE TRUE
:Image:Interlocking NC Blue.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dwight Jones 

message: It seems to me that Hansbrough's number shouldn't appear in the retired jersey list as it hasn't actually been retired yet. His winning of the Sporting News Player of the Year Award means he's eligible to have his jersey retired. But it won't actually happen until the season after he leaves the university. I think the mention of his eligibility to have his jersey retired in the article is appropriate enough for now. Ncjon (talk) 01:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hansbrough's "retired" jersey 

message: THIS MAY NOT BE TRUE!! Ha ha, just kidding, I just wanted to fit in with the rest of this page. Anyway, there's nothing on men's soccer on the main page, and since the team went to the NCAA semifinals this year, they should probably get a section, right? If a college's team went to the basketball semifinals they'd get a section, maybe even its own page? Maybe basketball is more important than soccer but is that for Wikipedia to decide?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.252.47 (talk) 05:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Men's soccer 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on North Carolina Tar Heels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312151817/http://blogs.newsobserver.com/sportsmedia/hbos-duke-unc-documentary to http://blogs.newsobserver.com/sportsmedia/hbos-duke-unc-documentary
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Their official website refers to them as for "womxn", but that site doesn't seem to have been updated since 2020: . Their regularly updated Instagram and Twitter accounts say "women". WP:Secondary source coverage in this and this source uses "women". As our article on womxn notes, the term has been controversial. Crossroads -talk- 03:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleiades Ultimate Frisbee team, womxn vs. women