lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Helpmate

message: Helpmate is also a robot which works in Hospitals. due to its popularity please make a disambigious page for Helpmate word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.98.166.86 (talk) 18:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be an article about the hospital device, so I don't think a disambig page would do much good.  Bubba73 (talk), 18:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig

message: In Article 6.9 (what happens if one player runs out of time) and Article 7.5 (how to proceed after two completed illegal moves) of the FIDE Laws of Chess the rules define the following draw: "However, the game is drawn if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player's king by any possible series of legal moves." This description is equivalent to a "Helpmate". This is not personal research only, I add two main arbiter case, where they reference Article 6.9 using the "Helpmate" term.. I find this relation of utmost importance. Helpmate as such should have two connections: First "Helpmate" as the idea of the other side cooperating in mate, as referenced by the FIDE arbiter's, and second "Helpmate problem" as intriguing problems with this approach. Now the article focus on the second aspect. I suggest to also add the first technical aspect. I made an attempt in this direction, that was a bit too much, and was reverted. So now, before changing something again, I am asking for your opinions first. Dlbbld (talk) 21:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In the two sources, the comparison between the FIDE rule and the stipulations of a helpmate problem is used as a way to explain or clarify the FIDE rule.  If you think it is helpful, you might add something like that, citing or quoting one of the sources, to the article Rules of Chess.  IMO the comparison would not be helpful in the article Helpmate, that is, it would be distracting, but tangential to the appreciation of chess problems.  Bruce leverett (talk) 03:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback. The FIDE Laws of Chess state "The game is drawn when a position has arisen in which neither player can checkmate the opponent's king with any series of legal moves." I find the formulation very complicated. A formulation like "The game is drawn when neither player has a helpmate." would be tempting, as shorter and avoid any misunderstanding. But as I understood, this is not correct. The relation between the helpmate and the FIDE rule is only in the idea of the helpmate. That is to check if there is a mate with the cooperation of the opponent. Maybe the meaning of helpmate will change over time, but that is purely speculative, and as such, the article is just fine. Dlbbld (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpmate and FIDE rules
Talk:Pawn storm

message: I don't think the article illustrates pawn storms at all well. In the first place, a pawn storm most often is directed against the enemy king. Examples are seen in many varations of the Sicilian (e.g., the Velimirovic Attack, the Yugoslav Attack against the Dragon (e.g. Fischer-Larsen), the English Attack against the Scheveningen) and King's Indian Defenses (the Saemisch, sometimes the Averbakh, and the main lines (...f5-f4, ...g5-g4, etc. - e.g., Taimanov-Najdorf)). Neither of the two examples given shows this. 
Secondly, neither of the two examples demonstrates a pawn storm at all. We are told that in Fischer-Petrosian Black rapidly advanced his pawns, forcing White's resignation, but the game continuation is not given, nor even a link to the game. The other position given does not, as yet, show a pawn storm at all. White has placed his pawns on d5, e4, and f4. That may become a pawn storm if White advances further, but as yet I would not call it a pawn storm at all. Now Mariotti-Gligoric - that was a pawn storm. Bisguier-Larsen is a good example of a consummated central pawn storm.
Krakatoa (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The Fischer-Petrosian example is example of a pawn roller (not storm). Ihardlythinkso (talk) 22:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then I think that pawn roller needs to be incorporated into this article or have its own article.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 23:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not even sure if yall are even on wikipedia anymore, but finally, after 10 years, I decided to add your suggestions. I created the pawn roller article as a redirect and added the information necessary onto this article. I also fixed the example's description as an example of a pawn roller, rather than an example of a pawn storm. SonOfYoutubers (talk) 05:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs work
Talk:Egypt Central

message: There is a discussion about whether or not to include Devour the Day in Template:Egypt Central at Template_talk:Egypt_Central#Should_Devour_the_Day_be_included_in_Template:Egypt_Central.3F. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about Template:Egypt_Central
Talk:Valmouth

message: Would someone who has actually read the book please delete and re-write the summary? The book is about eroticism and exoticism in a setting of quaint old British ladies at a spa. The current summary doesn't even mention that and is inaccurate to boot. Softlavender (talk) 01:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary is really bad and inaccurate
Talk:Fulton Road Bridge

message: The replacement bridge, which will also be called the Fulton Road Bridge, is scheduled to open soon.  I have begun updating the article to include that fact.THD3 (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose you could cross-reference the info for both new and old using line-breaks. I moved the images around a bit to sort of give a sense of linear continuity. I'm not sure if you'll like it. Mr. Florentine wasn't a fan of my designs...Ryecatcher773 (talk) 07:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Barring any more delays, the new bridge will be opening up soon.  Once that takes place, I will head over to the west side and take some pictures.  (I have a new camera with better resolution.)  I see this as being similar to articles on makes and models of cars: find the best picture you can and put that in the infobox. The current photo is not bad, but it's not high resolution.  Also, the old bridge was rather dilapidated at this point and about to be demolished.THD3 (talk) 12:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 bridges, 1 article
Talk:Irwin Edman

message: What caused his untimely death in 1954?Lestrade (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of death

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* Tables may be used to organise short stories, poems and/or book reviews. 
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Joseph Wood Krutch

message: what is currently given is ambiguous, presumably what is meant is for the vowel to be /u/ but I'm not certain. Someone who is familiar with this should fix it, I will try to find whoever added that transcription.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Telmac (talk • contribs) 21:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not familiar enough with the pronunciation notation to know if this is now correct.  I know from one of his relatives that Krutch used a Germanic pronunciation of his name, and that he very likely descended from Germans or Swiss who lived in Wartburg, Morgan County, TN, which was a German-speaking community in its early days.  The “u” in “Krutch” would rhyme with the “ew” in knew or slew, which in old notation (if memory serves) would be “oo” tied with the flat or ‘long’ ligature, as in “zoom” or “room”.  My German is almost forgotten, but the “u” in gesundheit would be an example; NEVER the Americanized “hutch” or “crutch”.  I hope someone familiar with the IPL or IPC, or whatever that notation is, will address this.  I will attempt to contact Telmac, but I fear he may be taking a long, if not permanent, wiki-sabbatical.  Ragity (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation of name 
Talk:KMJ (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the IATA code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the radio station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the IATA code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Category talk:Politics of Tennessee

message: THE  SHERIFFS AND  THE SENATORS AND THE  CONGRESSMEN  HAD  BETTER SHARPEN  UP AND  GET  ON TOP OF THE  LATEST  ISSUES  ABOUT  THE  ILLEGAL USURPING  ALIEN IN OUR  WHITE HOUSE.  THE  COURTS  HAD  BETTER  WAKE  UP AND  REALIZE  AS  WE THE  PEOPLE  HAVE  ALREADY  HAD  ENOUGH LIES - AND NON-ACTION  FROM  THE  VERY  PEOPLE  WHO HAVE  SWORN TO  UP-HOLD OUR  CONSTITUTION  AND  ALL THE  PEOPLE  SEE  IS  COWARDS  AND  PEOPLE  WHO ARE AFRAID  TO DO THE HONEST -RESPECTABLE- TRUTHFUL- RIGHT - HONORABLE -DECENT-  CONSTITUTIONALLY RIGHT-  FOR  THE  PEOPLE  WHO ELECTED  THEM  TO DO WHAT  IS  CONSTITUTIONALLY RIGHT  IN THE SIGHT OF GOD AND COUNTRY AND REPUBLIC AND  "WE THE PEOPLE"!!!!!   FOR SOME  REASON  THE NEXT  ELECTION  IS WHAT  COUNTS????  WELL, WAKE UP  AND  SMELL THE  REALITY  BECAUSE  YOU MAY NOT BE THERE BY THAT TIME!!!!!!    WE THE PEOPLE WILL TAKE DOING THE  RIGHT CONSTITUTIONAL  ACTIONS  IF  WE DO NOT  SEE  THE  COWARDS IN OFFICE DO TAKE A STAND  AND SUPPORT  REMOVING THE  USURPING ILLEGAL ALIEN IN OUR "WE  THE PEOPLES" WHITE  HOUSE. WAKE UP AND  LOOK AT  THE  ORIGINAL BIRTH CIRTIFICATE AND ILLEGAL SS# AND ALL THE LIES AND FRADULENT  PAPERS FLOATING  AROUND!!! WHAT  ARE YOU  ALL WAITING  FOR???????  REMOVE THIS  USURPING  ILLEGAL  ALIEN  NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
 THE  SHERIFFS AND  THE SENATORS AND THE  CONGRESSMEN  HAD  BETTER SHARPEN  UP AND  GET  ON TOP OF THE  LATEST  ISSUES  ABOUT  THE  ILLEGAL USURPING  ALIEN IN OUR  WHITE HOUSE.  THE  COURTS  HAD  BETTER  WAKE  UP AND  REALIZE  AS  WE THE  PEOPLE  HAVE  ALREADY  HAD  ENOUGH LIES - AND NON-ACTION  FROM  THE  VERY  PEOPLE  WHO HAVE  SWORN TO  UP-HOLD OUR  CONSTITUTION  AND  ALL THE  PEOPLE  SEE  IS  COWARDS  AND  PEOPLE  WHO ARE AFRAID  TO DO THE HONEST -RESPECTABLE- TRUTHFUL- RIGHT - HONORABLE -DECENT-  CONSTITUTIONALLY RIGHT-  FOR  THE  PEOPLE  WHO ELECTED  THEM  TO DO WHAT  IS  CONSTITUTIONALLY RIGHT  IN THE SIGHT OF GOD AND COUNTRY AND REPUBLIC AND  "WE THE PEOPLE"!!!!!   FOR SOME  REASON  THE NEXT  ELECTION  IS WHAT  COUNTS????  WELL, WAKE UP  AND  SMELL THE  REALITY  BECAUSE  YOU MAY NOT BE THERE BY THAT TIME!!!!!!    WE THE PEOPLE WILL TAKE DOING THE  RIGHT CONSTITUTIONAL  ACTIONS  IF  WE DO NOT  SEE  THE  COWARDS IN OFFICE DO TAKE A STAND  AND SUPPORT  REMOVING THE  USURPING ILLEGAL ALIEN IN OUR "WE  THE PEOPLES" WHITE  HOUSE. WAKE UP AND  LOOK AT  THE  ORIGINAL BIRTH CIRTIFICATE AND ILLEGAL SS# AND ALL THE LIES AND FRADULENT  PAPERS FLOATING  AROUND!!! WHAT  ARE YOU  ALL WAITING  FOR???????  REMOVE THIS  USURPING  ILLEGAL  ALIEN  NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.99.15 (talk) 04:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Category talk:Forts in Tennessee

message: Hey there, I am not sure if the parent cat :Category:Visitor attractions is fully appropriate for all the forts. At least two of them, Ft. Randolph and Ft. Prudhomme, are no longer in existance, the powder magazine remaining of Ft. Wright is on private property and not accessible to visitors without permission. But I guess it's not that important, I just wanted to mention the exceptions from the rule. The other forts are pretty nice visitor attractions, I have seeen a few of them myself even.
At this time, the List of forts (Tennessee) and the :Category:Forts in Tennessee have identical members, I have updated them both. Take care and happy editing, doxTxob \ talk 00:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visitor attractions
Talk:One Bayfront Plaza

message: Recently there has been a lot of edit warring going on in this article regarding the projected height of this building. I'll admit I was a part of it, and hope we can all come to an agreement so that this war can stop immediately. There seems to be confusion about whether the building is 1,049 ft (320 m) or 1,180 ft (360 m). I have found more relaible sources stating that the building will be the latter, these sources including the project's official website and the SkyscraperPage entry for the building (this site is regarded as very reliable). The pages seem to correspond with each other, especially since both show similar images of the building. The page which seems to not correspond is Emporis. Emporis shows a completely different image and different information. As Emporis has had errors in the past, and the entry directly contradicts the project's actual website, I am not sure it is reliable. I have cited both Skyscraperpage.com and the Project Page as references to show the building is planned at 1,180 ft. If another reliable source can be cited to go along with Emporis, then we may have a problem. But for now, I think we should stick to the info given on the building's website. Raime 05:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Height of the building

message: The building's projected completion date has jumped five years into the future; a reference is obviously needed to show this is not original research. 
In addition, the sentence One Bayfront Plaza has been approved, but with modifications which are still unknown at this time has been added to the article. This seems very speculative, and a reference is definitely needed. 
I will leave the information for now, but as both are possible examples of original research and/or unreliable information, sources are necessary, and need to be added soon. Otherwise, this information will be deleted. Raime 05:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On August 2, 2007, I removed the unverified pieces of information. Enough time has passed for the author of this information to reference it. Since this was not accomplished, I reverted back to the original completion date, and removed the claim that the building was approved. Please do not reinstate this information without a reliable source to back up the claim. Raime 02:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations Needed

message: This article now meets the criteria for Good Article status.  Good work! Argos'Dad 13:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And now it doesn't by far, it never really did. Another botched 2007 job. Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: GA

message: This will be the third time I've overhauled the article. To avoid this, it should be less detailed and just cover the basic key points. I tried to keep it detailed because it was supposed to be a Good Article, and I was trying to keep it up to par. B137 (talk) 19:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul
Talk:Uppity Cracker

message: The left rights was pretty much a joke side-project, I really would not consider it a band, therefore the last line is kind of unnecessary. -Corey
I agree, very unncessary. Jimmy has said they did it all in one night or a week or something. Its just them jacking around. So I'm removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.132.42 (talk) 23:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bredgar

message: Material from  was copied directly into the article.  As the source indicates this material is from a survey published in 1798, there isn't any issue of copyright.  However, it is inappropriate as the text has not been editted in any way for readability as an encyclopedia article, and its description of the parish while accurate for 1798, is likely not representative of it today.  The material from there may be useful for sourcing a history section for this article however. -- Whpq (talk) 17:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is what I have hopefully done ! DavidAnstiss (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted text dump
Talk:Paradelle

message: ----
This page needs some citations or links to the sources of information.
MuggleCast 01:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Card advantage

message: I think there should be a number of articles on the basic concepts of Magic theory. Card advantage and tempo definitely deserve articles. I don't think these should be hugely in depth, but they should talk about them at least somewhat. They're certainly notable, being the subject of numerous articles. Titanium Dragon 01:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic theory articles 

message: The way this article opens up, "Card advantage (often abbreviated CA) is a term used in collectible card game strategy," indicates that the article that follows is going to be about "collectible card game strategy" and not the more specific "Magic The Gatherings strategy."
I would like to see the article become more general about card games rather than specific to MTG.  Spots of specificity include:
*"The concept was first discovered early in the history of Magic: The Gathering strategy"
*"if a player casts Ancestral Recall, a spell that"
*"If a player plays Plague Wind, a card which destroys all enemy creatures in play"
*The entire "Forms of card advantage" section.
If we would like to have an article specifically on Card Advantage for Magic the Gatherings then the route taken by the Tempo article for MTG should be used.  The Tempo article for MTG adds (Magic: The Gathering) to the end.
Zell Faze (talk) 23:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MTG or General? 

message: I'm not sure if this is too in-depth or if would lead to the problem a previous editor had in the article being too MtG-specific but the article seems to focus on literal card drawing. I think adding to the first example in the "forms of card advantage" section in explain ways to have more cards to play without literally drawing cards would be useful (the best example of this I can think of is being able to play a card from your graveyard, meaning that while you have seven cards in hand and haven't drawn anymore, you effectively have eight cards you can play). SOAMMS (talk) 03:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Forms
Talk:Graveney

message: No mention of the Graveney Boat, the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, UK, used to have a mock up of it.2.98.124.144 (talk) 17:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have added section about it. DavidAnstiss (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Graveney boat
Talk:Hernhill

message: I have no problem with the suggested merging of the entries for Dargate and Waterham.  Would it be worth keeping notional pages for those two hamlets, with a redirect to the Hernhill page?   If so, it would presumably be best to do the same for the other hamlets in the civil parish.  Eebkent (talk) 11:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Kemsley

message: I have removed the paragraph on 'The Kemsley Arms'. The listing of the former pub as “asset of community value” appears to no longer apply – it is not mentioned in news reports in recent years. These reports confirm the building has been empty for the last ten years, with planning permission for flats not being granted. 
I don't regard a paragraph on a derelict building, now regarded as an eyesore, requires mention in this Wikipedia article. If you disagree, feel free to replace, suitably updated.
Hsq7278 (talk) 13:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Kemsley Arms
Talk:Kiss of Death

message: The origin of the term "kiss of death" is disputed.  At least one Italian source indicates that it is incorrect to call the Kiss of Judas the Kiss of death. Comunemente, ma a torto, l’espressione è usata nello stesso senso di bacio di Giuda.  --Bejnar (talk) 08:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In which case, yes, it's probably better to stay out of the business of declaring either usage as the origin of the term and just list them both without comment. --ShelfSkewed Talk 14:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin
Talk:Rodmersham Green

message: This small hamlet should really be merged with Rodmersham (the other part of the village less than 1 mile away) 
This place is not notable enough to have its own page.DavidAnstiss (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm about to do this - there is virtually nothing to merge across to be honest. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Selling, Kent

message: “ The tax of the manor of the Selling in 1130, was given to the Monastery of St. Augustine. In 1252, (after the Dissolution of the Monasteries), it passed to Sir Anthony St. Leger”
According to Wikipedia article on the Dissolution of the Monasteries:
“ The dissolution of the monasteries, occasionally referred to as the suppression of the monasteries, was the set of administrative and legal processes between 1536 and 1541 ” Stourestuary (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissolution of the monasteries
Talk:Colorado Rocky Mountain School

message: Just a friendly reminder:  This page belongs to Wikipedia, not the school it is about.  The administration (or the students) have no greater control over it than any other Wikipedia editor.  The top posting on this page indicates that the administration of the school feels otherwise.  Just to let you know, you are wrong.  This page reads like a press release, and that will end very soon.  If you want to participate in the process, you are welcome to chime in here about anything you wish to discuss regarding the article's content.  The school administration should not edit the article at all, as they have a conflict of interest, but you are welcome to start or participate in any discussion about this articles content. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:OWN]] 

message: "The school's location in western Colorado facilitated experimentation as well as necessitating practical adaptation of the ideas of its eastern U.S and European-based influences."  Huh?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fp cassini (talk • contribs) 01:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  sounds like ad copy