lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2003 Kettering Borough Council election

message: Most of the articles on Kettering councillors have been nominated for deletion:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Anderson
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Bayes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Brace
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Civil
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Corazzo
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Freer
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Groome
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Lamb
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Parker (politician)
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Smith-Haynes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Titcombe
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Whyte
Timrollpickering 14:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Councillor articles for deletion
Talk:1999 Kettering Borough Council election

message: Most of the articles on Kettering councillors have been nominated for deletion:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Anderson
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Bayes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Brace
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Civil
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Corazzo
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Freer
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Groome
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Lamb
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Parker (politician)
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Smith-Haynes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Titcombe
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Whyte
Timrollpickering 14:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Councillor articles for deletion
Talk:Kettering Borough Council elections

message: Most of the articles on Kettering councillors have been nominated for deletion:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Anderson
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Bayes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Brace
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Civil
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Corazzo
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Freer
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Groome
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Lamb
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Parker (politician)
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Smith-Haynes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Titcombe
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Whyte
Timrollpickering 14:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Councillor articles for deletion
Talk:Community of place

message: *Context of interaction
*motivation for interaction
*Rates of interaction and location of members
*Face-to-face interaction, opposed to interaction through other mediums Variables effect the behavior and organizational outcomes of the community.
**The idea of community suggest many appealing features of a social relationship: Familiarity, safety, mutual concern, support and loyalties. Even the idea of being appreciated for efforts and contribution, rather than individual status or rank.
Gemeinschaft Revisited
Waffufi (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that you've got a good start here, but I would like to see sentences soon.  Also: please start posting on the mainspace for the article rather than just on the talk page.  Alfgarciamora (talk) 02:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variables of Community
Talk:78th Academy Awards nominees and winners

message: I am against thhe current format of putting the nominees in alphabetical order, and simply making the winners boldfaced. Like IMDb, I believe the winners should be above the other names, and then the other nominees should be listed below with Other nominees written above those. I think this format is easier on the eyes, and simply clearer. Supertigerman 17:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bishop's Stortford F.C.

message: Please add more external links if any are known. (Jaybrown27 09:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who are the club's main rivals? I feel this info should be included  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.178.250 (talk) 22:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rivals
Talk:Islamic Republic News Agency

message: --Earle Rheaume 15:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This article lacks any cited material, and is poorly constructed. Furthermore, it does not have a thorough discussion of the nature of the media presented by the IRNA. It should probably be noted that the IRNA has little integrity as a "News Agency", as they only publish pro-Iran stories. Anyone agree with this?
John.doe.cows (talk) 09:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs work
Talk:The A1 Steam Locomotive Trust

message: Duncharris:
Sorry, but why do you have changed the link to the article "LNER Peppercorn Class A1 60163 Tornado"? In this article is a link to "A1 Steam Locomotive Trust" which leads to itself because of this ...
Urmelbeauftragter 16:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The trust is only associated with the one engine.  If they build another one, then maybe they deserve their own article. — Dunc|☺ 15:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think they deserve their own article under WP:Corporation Notability. However, due to disagreement on the matter, i've added it all to the article it redirects to! HawkerTyphoon 16:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Communitas

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 
Talk:B-1 Nuclear Bomber

message: This was an Avalon Hill game and I remember seeing ads for it when it was released, so it's at least mildly notable: it's not something some guy knocked together in their basement and gave to a couple of mates. I'm not sure whether that's enough to justify inclusion, but I wouldn't delete it myself. Mark Grant 15:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Stainless Night

message: This article has been tagged for notability issues since 2008 with no improvements to sources. I've found no reviews or other significant coverage. I'm redirecting to List of titles by Pink Pineapple, which contains all information found in this article except for plot details and credits. Skeletor3000 (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:German monarchy

message: *"The Holy Roman Empire is not considered truly German, since it contained many different peoples and languages" Was the British empire not really british, because it included a whole lot more people than just Brits? In fact, at its height, the Britons quite probably where a minority, whereas the HRE was predominantly German. Totally aside from that, Bavarian monarchy and Prussian monarchy etc. are also German monarchies.  --OliverH 15:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:National Union of Students

message: There's been a bit of a debate over which entities to include, especially those from non-English speaking countries, with some deletions and additions.
A lot of the national students' unions are not terribly well known at all outside their native languages and variously three conventions seem to operate simultaneously - use the original language name, translate the name into English (some appear to have a standard English version of the name) or refer to them using the local national union's terminology (i.e. the "Such & Such National Union of Students" or "Such & Such National Students Association").
The third convention is obviously informal, but whichever of the other two is followed determines whether or not some of the entries should be on the disambig list. Note also that on National Unions of Students in Europe all the members are currently listed by English names, although many don't have articles at all.
Can I suggest that this page should list all entities whose name translates (or officially gives its name in English) as "National Union of Students" give or take adjective placeing? Timrollpickering 15:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which bodies to list
Talk:Jan-Olof Bengtsson

message: The page IDAG redirects here. Could someone explain why? Wiki-uk 12:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bengtsson wrote 3 articles in March 1990 in the iDAG newspaper. I've added a reference to them in the "Featured articles" section.Phase4 14:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IDAG redirect page
Talk:Commanding General of the United States Army

message: John Schofield was the Commanding General of the United States Army from 14 August 1888 – 29 September 1895.  This article lists him as a Lieutenant General.  But he wasn't promoted to Lieutenant General until February 1895.  I propose that this article should reflect the fact that he didn't have the same rank for the entire time he was the Commanding General of the United States Army (and similar notes about other Commanding Generals of the United States Army who didn't have the same rank the whole time). - Shaheenjim 21:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: such info could (and perhaps should) be added to the "note's" box for each, but the "name" section should list the highest rank during tenure, as is standard for such historic lists.  Gecko G (talk) 23:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Different ranks at different times

message: This article lists Nelson A. Miles (Commanding General from 5 October 1895 – 8 August 1903) as a Major General.  However, the wikipedia article on him and this website say he was promoted to Lieutenant General in 1900 or 1901. - Shaheenjim 15:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miles's rank
Talk:Saucer

message: Anyone know if its anything to do with sauce?--Light current 15:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of word 

message: Interesting anecdote, but apocryphal.  I doubt that a Canadian who published his memoirs in 1894 would have been privy to a conversation between Jefferson and Washington. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Senate quote]

message: Cooling tea/coffee.  My Momma used a colloquial term from the south denoting a heartfelt way a housewife.would pour coffee back and forth  to saucer. This was done so that the coffee would cool in time for the coffee to be cooled quickly when the husband would be late for work. Oldsouthadage (talk) 19:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1940's + term used to cool coffee perked on stove that was boiling hot.
Talk:Seaford, Delaware

message: Please feel free to add the city's seal and flag to the InfoBox.  I am having great difficulty finding an electronic version.  It would give the page a much better look, in my humble opinion. --levelhead 18:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seal and flag

message: Better photos are encouraged.  I took the current 'skyline' photo found in the InfoBox back in July 2004 just before I moved to Japan while I was driving down High Street toward Front Street.  Ideally, I think a photograph taken from the Nanticoke would be much better. --levelhead 18:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: The youth sports thing may have been officially adopted, but the Nylon Capital nickname was, and is, widely known.
Decafdyke 12:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname

message: In my opinion, the best restaurants in Seaford are Texas roadhouse and Bon Appapetit. Texas roadhouse is for people enjoy good food without going to a fancy restaurant to get it. There is usually a long wait there, though. Bon Appapetit is the classiest and most fancy restaurant in all of Seaford.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.192.182 (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  restaurants  

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.e50plus.com/public/1268print.cfm and http://www.seafordde.com/index.cfm?ref=21100. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Minimac (talk) 10:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lodi, New Jersey

message: Like Kearny, Lodi has an unusual pronounciation - sounds like "low-die". Can any IPA masters whip up a pronounciation guide?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.111.239.254 (talk) 07:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can Lodi be both a Township and a borough?  The article contradicts itself. Iamanadam (talk) 04:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: huh?

message: I think there should be mention of Lodi's volunteer fire department, but in which section would it belong?nycdi (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Volunteer Fire Department
Talk:Brittany (administrative region)

message: I would like the origins of the comic book asterix and obelix to be added somewhere in the history. It's a great book about the history of the area from a fun light hearted perspective and is a world known book translated into many languages. It talks about the romans fighting the Gaules or Gaulois because, like romans do, they wanted to take over France and the Gaules were the main force existing that would fight against them.
:See Armorica. Paul B (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Asterix

message: Ime puzzled by the phrase "the 26 regions of France". At  the foot of the page, I counted 22 regions. Are there 4 more or is there an error? ` Froggo Zijgeb 04:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regions of France

message: quick question here, but why is the seal of the region being shown and not the flag and the coat of arms like every other region in france
Scu ba (talk) 02:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - Good question. It might be because this is the article for the present-day administrative region, as opposed to the cultural region, which has a separate article (Brittany). But the other administrative region articles—except for the recently created regions—tend to have both a flag and a coat of arms in the infobox. So this may be something that wants attention in the interest of consistency. Eric talk 03:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag and coat of arms 

message: , I undid your insertion of that map graphic because it does not have any legend to explain what is being depicted (e.g. significance of colors used or line weight of boundaries). I went to the file on Commons and see that it could use some help there as well. (Note: fr actuel = en current; but we should use the year instead). Eric talk 13:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1789/2022 map of Brittany
Talk:Hit-and-run tactics

message: Hi
I was just thinking... since the term hit-and-run is a polysemy, I wonder which one we may need to rewrite, this article or its disambiguation page, so that the idea of hit-and-run as a tactic in multiple fields can be covered. Thanks.
:Actually, most of the examples given would be much more accurately described as feigned retreat. Looks like the author got a little carried away here... --Latebird (talk) 14:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalize? 

message: I appreciate that there may not be a enough material to create an individual article for each of these topic at this present moment, but this should really be a disambiguation and not on the same page. We can't put the military doctrine and economics in the same place.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.220.177 (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economics and Military?
Talk:Ballowall Barrow

message: Restored the text as below - statement is about something political concerning this site, but is not written in a pov or inflammatory way - mentioning a political fact concerning this site is not against wikipedia rules so long as neutrally written.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link).
*BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over  195.92.168.164 13:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site
Talk:Zhanmadao

message: There are several images available on the internet of zhanmadao, but I haven't uploaded one due to uncertainty about the copyright of the images.  http://forums.swordforum.com/ or http://www.sevenstarstrading.com/articles/ both have images or links to images. -- Medains 15:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Non-fiction books

message: I'm about to create a sub-cat of , , which would include reference works, history of film, Leonard Maltin, etc. Any thoughts? ♥ Her Pegship♥ 16:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable. -- Visviva 13:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

message: i realize that book publ, distrib, and sellers have traditionally categorized pol books as nonfic, but most ppl know they are (overall) fiction (at best, they consist mostly of opinion).
so, i ask rhetorically: why can't wiki-p represent more accurately? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.234.222.50 (talk) 06:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pol books don't belong in "non fiction'
Talk:Russ Diamond

message: I would suggest a section be added regarding Diamond potentially acting is a domestic bio-terrorist due to being knowingly COVID-19 positive, hiding this from his coworkers whom he was working closely with in the Senate and purposefully failing to inform them. MrEarlGray (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume you're the person adding all the ridiculous, slanderous misinformation to this article? Can you try to write as a neutral person instead of a left wing activist? Engineer-005 (talk) 02:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covid-19
Talk:Married Women's Property Act 1882

message: There was actually a whole series of married women's property acts in various legal jurisdictions -- and I think some preceded the British one... AnonMoos 16:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is to a certain extent misleading without references to the Married Women's Property Acts of 1870, 1893, and 1907. In particular some of the references to the previous situation were no longer true after 1870. The article should be re-written for greater accuracy and historical context.
Logical Analyst (talk) 10:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever general context we now have is mainly on article Coverture.  Anyway, probably there should be an overview article on Married Women's Property Acts in English-speaking countries in general, and this article could be coordinated with Married Women's Property Act 1870... AnonMoos (talk) 18:39, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving historical context 

message: In Belper Derbyshire at least there were moves from at least the beginning of the century  to resolve this. For instance in 1836 Sarah Statham inherited a copyhold property from her uncle. She surrendered a share to her husband and later made arrangements to sell it. The deeds to the property state ". . .she the said Sarah having been first examined by the said Steward in open Court in the absence of her said husband & having acknowledged that she was not thereto compelled by her said husband but of her own free will did consent to that Surrender" I am wondering if this was common practice at this time Chevin (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Prior to the Acts
Talk:Blogger.com

message: The following is an archive of the Blogger move and redirect discussion.
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was do not move.  Consensus is to move somewhere besides Blogger.  Since that would not require administrator assistance, I am simply closing this.  Feel free to continue the discussion as to the correct final location. —Wknight94 (talk) 23:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

message: * Blogger.com → Blogger … Rationale: All websites are referred to without the ".com" suffix, as is Xanga, MySpace, and Google. The company themselves refer to the company as "Blogger" and never as "Blogger.com". —–-  kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 09:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support Make article "Blogger" with a redirect from "Blogger.com" --mtz206 (talk) 11:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment If so, then Blogger should be a disambig for Blogger (person) and Blogger.com or something like that. --mtz206 (talk) 03:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Not as "Blogger.com", but maybe as Blogger (website)? ALso, please keep in mind that the current "Blogger" link directs to this article.–-  kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 05:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: So, are we arguing that Blogger should be an article about "one who blogs", with a  tag pointing to Blogger (website)? I'd support that. (Blogspot.com should be a redirect, if anything) --mtz206 (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Three points: (1) I am not sure we have anything encyclopedic (i.e., more than a dicdef) to say about "one who blogs," so I don't see that being a main article. Am I wrong? What would the content of Blogger-the-person be like? (2) Not all Blogger blogs are hosted on Blogspot. (3) I think it should be Blogger (web application) or Blogger (company). Some Blogger users never actually visit the website after they sign up--it's the service that is important, not the site. Let's try to sort this out before we do any moves. · rodii · 14:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Dudley & Nestor Do Nothing

message: From the Trivia section:
When Dudley says diamic move advantage Dudley and Nestor and does a secret handshake, that is from the show The Suite Life of Zack and Cody.
What's "diamic move advantage"?  Diamic isn't a word, is that actually what's said in the programme?  —JD[don't talk|email] 15:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dinamic isn't a word either.  Are you sure it's not dynamic, or is there something in the episode to suggest that it's meant to be spelt dinamic?  J Ditalk 02:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, well misspellings don't look too good, and as I haven't seen this programme, I didn't know if it was meant to be there.  J Ditalk 08:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain something for me