lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chevrolet van

message: The picture of the 64-70 van is actually an 80's van.````
What about Chevrolet step vans (P series-P10, P20, P30), which were "UPS" style vans built on 1/2, 3/4, or 1 ton truck chassis from the 1960's to the 1980's?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.78.96.58 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I vote no because the Express van is simply the evolution of the same vehicles which has had many names over the years.X570 14:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also vote that this article should be split into two different articles. Eric Wester 16:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split this article? 

message: Why is the Beauville not mentioned? It was not just a 1950s Chevy Station Wagon it was also a popular Chevy Van option.76.16.78.28 03:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the Beauville not mentioned 

message: I think that the references to the GMC Vandura should be modified to "G-Series", simply because Vandura was a name given the vehicle that was based on body style and trim line. GMC G-Series passenger vans were called "Rally Wagon" instead, in most cases.
Calling the GMC G-Series Van a "Vandura" would be like calling all C/K pickups before 1999 "Silverado" or "Sierra". That kind of retroactive anachronistic naming isn't true to history because in each case, the Sierra, Silverado, Vandura, and Rally Wagon names were used on specific models in specific trim lines within their series. Thoughts? Rhettro76 18:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  G-Series v. Vandura 

message: Technical manuals etc. refer to Beauville etc as "G-20" but it's not mentioned here!? Is G-20 a "G-Series", by the way? --Treekids (talk) 06:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the G-20 is the 3/4 ton version of the G-Series. I just renamed that article today, and it really needs plenty of other work. Better yet, perahps it should be merged into this one. ----DanTD (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of G20? 

message: It says that the diesel engine was introduced during 1986, but I have to say this engine appeared along with the new sheetmetal for 1983. Correct?
WikiPro1981X (talk) 21:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diesel Engine Introduced in 1983 - Correct? 

message: I own a 1985 Chevy G20 RV van and would like to share a photo and any other information. I have the original books that came with it and a large repair manual that repair shops used to repair the Chevy Trucks and vans... Michele Greenbrier (talk) 05:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1985 Chevy G20 Greenbrier RV van
Talk:Hypsizygus tessulatus

message: Isn't the correct name Hypsizygus tessulatus? --Episcophagus (talk) 10:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  tessellatus? 

message: MycoBank doesn't treat Hypsizygus tessulatus and Hypsizygus marmoreus as synonymous. Are there any reliable sources that treat them as such? — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 00:27, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonymy with Hypsizygus marmoreus
Talk:18th Panzer Division (Wehrmacht)

message: "...the first time in World War II submersible tanks were used in combat."  Does this mean that they had been used in combat in other wars previously? If not, could we not say "...the first time ever, submersible tanks were used in combat."  Even more impressive! GrahamBould 08:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder the same thing, I have never heard of submersible tanks being used in combat before 22 June 1941. So I believe it was the first time ever, but I can't find a source to back it up.--Bryson 03:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First?
Talk:The Return (The Office)

message: I propose moving all of the Quotes to Wikiquote. There is already a significant quote collection there which overlaps the list here, and Wikiquote is probably the correct place for them anyway. -- Raymondc0 00:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Unethical' seems a bizarre choice of wording. The point is, the quotes not only overlap with Wikiquote, but offer nothing in terms of plot because of the Synopsis section. They are relevant to the episode, but not necessary or needed in any way, so a link to Wikiquote will suffice. -- Viewdrix 19:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving quotes to Wikiquote
Talk:Surry Hills

message: Whoever is going through the Sydney suburbs pages and doing up the galleries with "Wikitable" formatting, good on yer!! Didn't know this feature existed and I am applying the code to some of the galleries I have put on other pages. It converts the thumbnails into a quite adequate-looking photo for viewers who don't want the full version but who are just browsing .Thanks indeed. MichaelGG May 4 2007
"Due to its location, Surry Hills has become one of the most expensive suburbs in Sydney." - Really? As a Sydneysider, I find this hard to believe. The Slurry is hardly a Vaucluse. It's full of pubs and little flats and therefore packed with young people/singles. This line makes it out to be Beverley Hills.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.51.44 (talk) 12:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi All, 
I've just placed an external link to the Dictionary of Sydney's article about surry hills (the article, info-page, and also the demographics). The diff is here. Now, I must point out that until recently I worked at the Dictionary so there's a fairly major CoI declaration, but I'm also sure that on balance our article on WP is well served by having a link out to the official encyclopedia of Sydney as a pointer for our readers. Tell me what you think.
Best, Witty Lama 15:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to DoS 

message: I have removed the image [The Clock Hotel, Crown Street] as this is already in the infobox. This image was placed in the article thrice so I had to remove it twice. Also the image of Rose Terrace is not in Surry Hills. I have checked its location in the street directory and it is of another suburb. I have seen this place whilst driving past and know that this is not Surry Hills. It also makes me wonder if some of the other images in this article are correctly placed. ***Adam*** 02:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate images and wrongly placed images

message: Do any etymological historians want to add a section on why it is spelled "Surry" instead of "Surrey" like the ones it was named after? 122.109.64.112 (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Warrawee, New South Wales

message: Knox Grammer School senior campus does not lie within the suburb of Warrawee.  The boundary is the road alignment on Boorambil St to the SE of the campus.  KGS does own several residental properties within the suburb, some of which serve as administraion buildings, some are used for senior staff member accomodation (e.g. the Headmasters house on the SE side of Boorambil). The only KGS property of educational note is Kelso(oops wrong school) sports field on the northern side of Bangalla St which is used by both the  Senior and Junior Schools (and the Old Boy's Society) as sports fields.  The only school campus entirely within the suburb is Warrawee Public.
Warrawee is the location of examples of residental architecture by several of Australia's significant architects, Gilling, Hunt, Venables Vernon (the son of the State Architect) and Wilkinson to name a few.  Vernon's daughter, now well into her late 80's remains a Warrawee resident in the house Vernon designed and built for his mother on Warrawee Ave. (Literature ref's are available - I will attempt to provide).
Due to Warrawee's location on the Hornsby escarpment and the local geography, residents of the suburb east of the railway line claim that it is the wettest suburb in Sydney.  As a resident, I have some faith in that but no proof - other than "if it rains anywhere in Sydney it rains in Warrawee".
Much of the suburb east of the railway was rural until the 1920's.
AFAIK the only commercial entity within the suburb is the Bowling Club on the Pacific Highway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.101.95.102 (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrawee - corrections and additions
Talk:Whale Beach, New South Wales

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Trikekus (:3) 01:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Eriogonum parvifolium

message: importance is based upon value of host plant for many insects (including  a semi-exlusive use by some california endemic endangered species) and mammals, and also its broad use as a landscape plant. it is also endemic to a fairly narrow coastal range of california- Anlace 01:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Importance is for the Wikiproject organizing all articles on the State of California, across all disciplines. of course the endangered species of the state are important, but they are not as important as encyclopedic subjects as other mid importance articles. this may be speciesist, but this is not the Plant kingdom Wikipedia (ie written by plants for plant speaking species)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: importance
Talk:1989 Formula One World Championship

message: I'm wondering how Senna could have won the championship at Adelaide. He had 60 points. With a win at Adelaide this would have been 69 - 7 less than Prost. Can anybody please explain? 194.138.127.36 16:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: McLaren had appealed against Senna's disqualification from the Japanese GP. If his Japanese GP victory had been reinstated and he'd won in Adelaide, he would have taken the Championship. DH85868993 05:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia article for Adelaide says the appeal was already rejected. There's a Youtube clip from Adelaide that year where Murray Walker says the same thing. I'm going to correct this in this article. ColinClark (talk) 08:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon checking (last time I was working from memory), that's correct. However McLaren were planning a civil challenge to Senna's disqualification from the Japanese GP in the French courts (source: Roebuck & Townsend's Grand Prix 1989). But when he failed to win in Adelaide, it became a moot point, so they didn't bother. DH85868993 (talk) 13:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Senna

message: How many scores counted for the 1989 Constructors' Championship? Apparently the 1990 FIA Yearbook says that only the best 11 scores counted (as for the Drivers' Championship), giving McLaren a score of 129, but formula1.com, ChicaneF1 and FORIX (subscription site) all give McLaren a score of 141 points, implying that all results counted (which, incidentally, is also what it says at List of Formula One World Championship points scoring systems). So which is correct? DH85868993 (talk) 02:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just about every source besides that FIA Yearbook gives McLaren 141 points and Williams 77 - plus I haven't seen any source that gives McLaren less than 199 points in 1988, or less than 121 (and Ferrari less than 110) in 1990. So might the Yearbook be wrong? Bluebird207 (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1990 FIA Yearbook (ie the "yellow book") shows McLaren's 1989 total points as 141 and its retained points as 129. The 1991 FIA Yearbook shows McLaren's 1990 total points as 121 and its retained points as 110. Unfortuneatly I don't have access to the 1989 FIA Yearbook. GTHO (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constructors Championship 
Talk:Upper Canada College houses

message: I've uploaded a bunch of images depicting the house colours as they appear on school ties. I'm going by ten year old memory here, so I hope I got them right.  However, Bremner's and McHugh's colours still evade me.  Hopefully someone can remind me, and I'll make up the last two. --G2bambino 01:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Now all that's missing is McHugh's. --G2bambino 16:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  House colours
Talk:Pinellas Park High School

message: The school mascot is the Patriot? Is that a bird, an animal? From a quick look at the school's website I'm thinking it's a reference to "people who exhibit pride in, and loyalty to, their country", as a consequence of the school being founded in the year 1976. But I'm just guessing, and as a reader am somewhat confused. I've not before come across a 'mascot' being a character trait explicitly, rather than an animal/bird etc that is held to exhibit a particular character trait. CaughtLBW 09:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding what a patriot is, at the time of your question, the Patriot link in the infobox had been disambiguated to Patriot (American Revolution). Regarding a patriot as a mascot, I'd refer you to the American football team New England Patriots. Wodup 22:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Having played against them I can tell you, their emblem was identical to the old New England Patriots helmet emblem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.101.92.56 (talk) 23:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Patriot
Talk:Tsing Yi Town

message: I've heard Tsing Yi Town Centre (青衣市中心) and Tsing Yi Hui (青衣墟), never heard of Tsing Yi Town (青衣市), could anyone have any source from the government that they have named Tsing Yi as a town?
In the urban planning of Hong Kong, there are new towns (新市鎮), but the "towns" are for planning, not a administrative unit. There is NO Town Government in our "new towns".
And even more ridiculous, even if you want to argue the "new towns" in Hong Kong are "towns", Tsing Yi is not a new town itself, Tsing Yi is a part of Tsuen Wan New Town (荃灣新市鎮). Tsing Yi Town Centre is one of the Town Centres in Tsuen Wan New Town. --方潤 (talk) 03:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any source for the name Tsing Yi Town?
Talk:Villa Esplanada

message: Oppose. The time span of stub is not a reason for deletion. Some articles like Katal had been stubs since 2001.  There are lot of solution to improve articles rather than deletion.  Please notes that notability is not subjective.  It requires research and consensus.  Unlike other places in the world, a housing estate is a community which could reach several ten or hundred thousands residents, probably more than a county or town in some countries.  As the reason involving the criteria of housing articles in Hong Kong, it would be better discussing the topic in Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board and Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong and formulate a consensus.  
— HenryLi (Talk) 02:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About deletion
Talk:Steven Waddington

message: Well, I can't access entertainment websites from my job so I can't look this up myself, but Steven Waddington has a helluva lot more credits than this.  Can someone with access expand? Magichands 01:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure but wasnt he Ivanhoe in... Ivanhoe? like early 90's. Anyone know? the only source i have is my dad lol so any others pleasse  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.4.81 (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ivanhoe?

message: He also played Bartholomew Columbus, the brother of Christopher Columbus in 1492: Conquest of Paradise. --Oddeivind (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1492

message: Rv almost empty infobox as per WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia’s reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.” Also, serious discrepancy in date of birth: 28 November 1968 v 30 December 1967. Quis separabit? 16:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Lockheed CL-1200 Lancer

message: Considering the X-27 never actually existed, I can see no reason to include it in the title here. It's confusing and reads poorly. Since X-27 already redirs here (or tries to), it seems there's more than enough ways to find this article either way. Maury 16:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but it's an X-plane designation none the less, and I was trying to account for that. I was trying to take to existing stubs, and make a better page. THe title was a sticcky point tho, and I'm not totally satisified with it either. If there's a consensus to move it to CL-1200 Lancer (by an admin, as page already exists), I won't oppose it. - BillCJ 16:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be happy with either Lockheed CL-1200 or CL-1200 Lancer personally. Maury 16:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Moved to Lockheed CL-1200. - BillCJ 17:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Saved me the effort :-) Maury 18:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Please do, book references are IMHO better than WebLinks. --Colputt 23:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, bad name 

message: Have added an infobox and my reference which confirms the specifications so removed the 'aerospecs' tag. There is a fair chunk on costings in my book which I might summarise.
Lots of emphasis on commonality with the F-104 as well as a sales pitch, need to paragraph that.
The image has come out a bit large in the infobox and the resolution is not so good, if someone could make it a bit smaller please (until I work ut how to do it myself!), Cheers Nimbus227 19:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some progress
Talk:Fairy godmother

message: Crusttitle==
I think this article would be better titled "Magical helpers" as fairy godmothers are not really noteworthy as a distinct group, as opposed to all the other magical givers of assistance in fairy tales.  Goldfritha 01:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I want to know to see how old the fairy grams REALLY are 2601:602:77F:E9E0:6D59:182E:7EDE:2BE0 (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When are the first recordings of fairy grandmothers?
Talk:Jeffrey Frederick

message: I have completely rewritten the article in a formal, encyclopedic style, although the subject itself (himself?) requires references to be made that are not of a typical scholarly nature, such as some of the quotations. Sources are cited and acknowledged. I am a widely published social scientist, author of numerous journal articles and books, and remain puzzled that new tags have been added as of this month.
Roger A. Straus, Ph.D. DeHypnotist 01:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article still tagged? 

message: Date of death? Given as 1996 in the intro but 1997 in the article. Which is correct? I made both dates 1997.
Date of marriage? Given as 2003 - clearly wrong, but what is the correct date? I changed it to 1983 because it fit the chronology. Zariane (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology??
Talk:List of weapons used in WWII

message: This page is has not been completed. Will remove notice immediately after completion. Going to be long article, but it will take ages to finish, so please wait. Thankyou.
This page is redundant with existing pages under List of World War II weapons, please merge it with those. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jonathan Sigalet

message: I'll be working on a bit of a re-write of this article.  If you'd like to take a look as I work on it, it will be in my User Sandbox. Tstreet (talk) 04:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Triboro Coach

message: Anyone see my sandbox for the replacement of the current bus routes list? What am I missing? Because nobody has answered me on these issues so far. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  02:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatting the bus routes 

message: I just added some information on this route. This was technically operated via a subsidiary of Triboro Coach, which I read in a newspaper article somewhere.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  QT LaGuardia Express
Talk:Dorgon

message: Because of edit-warring, I have protected the page for 3 days. This should give all editors ample time to have a discussion here over what the problem is, and to work out a consensus. Reverting one another's edits (and, particularly, reverting edits without giving any explanation for why, as Andres has done twice) is not an appropriate way to resolve disputes.
Per WP:BRD, I restored the article to its last version before the dispute began. This does not mean I favor either version over another; it's just standard procedure that, if a new change is contested, it be undone until a consensus is reached. rʨanaɢ (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Rjanag. Appreciate the protection. I will advance my case and let Andres discuss his point of view. It seems to me the issue at hand is whether or not we consider Dorgon and Emperor, but more importantly whether we should present it as such in the article. The facts are quite straightforward - Dorgon was regent to the Shunzhi Emperor, and he was posthumously declared to be Emperor. These facts are discussed adequately in the article. Pushing for Wikipedia to define Dorgon as an Emperor is a whole other story. In no history books is he recorded as being an Emperor in the conventional sense - they describe his posthumous ascendancy to be relevant only in terms of rank - some consider it the work of Empress Dowager Xiaozhuang, with whom he was rumoured to have a relationship. Whatever the reason may have been, he is not considered an Emperor in all major works of Chinese historiography. This article puts it the most succinctly: Dorgon was "An Emperor who was not Emperor". The article should be treated accordingly - mention the fact that he was posthumously declared Emperor, but do not define him as one. Colipon+(Talk) 23:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Shunzhi was the de facto emperor throughout 1644-1661 - the calendar usage then was based on "Shunzhi", not whatever era names of Dorgon. NoNews! 01:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 
Talk:Victor Shepherd

message: Full professors  who have received honorary degrees have had their notability demonstrated by those in their profession.
Needs sources, of course, but that is no reason to prod. 
Books asserted, but of course citations are needed. DGG 02:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abatai

message: I didn't see a citation for Trevor Dupuy's "Harper Encyclopedia of Military Biography."
The portion of the introduction that states "Although an inconsistent and dissolute malcontent, he nevertheless showed considerable ability as a military leader and administrator." is taken directly from the first page of this book.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:901:4300:8422:EC00:C7F3:E06:C36B (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yo this is straight up plagiarism