lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:San Miguel Foundation for the Performing Arts

message: Not sure about why both the Master Chorale and the Philharmonic Orchestra have to be combined under the SMFPA article with minimal details about these two groups. At any rate, I'm planning to add more information about these two groups sometime this week --Tito Pao 13:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Panzergrenadier Division Großdeutschland

message: "In November 1944, while the division and several attached units were redesignated as Panzerkorps Großdeutschland." - sentence is grammatically incorrect! The "while" is possibly not needed? 91.14.35.170 (talk) 15:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ready-to-assemble furniture

message: I have removed Main brands in the U.S. as it is a potential spam magnet and it is U.S.-centric (POV), perhaps some one in the future may want to recreate a similar type of list that is not just U.S.-focused. --blue520 13:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Brands in the USA 

message: I have removed two commercial links to the discussion page because I question the value they add.
*Although IKEA is mentioned in the article, a simple link to the business's  homepage may not be useful. * IKEA
*The 2nd link provides information on hiring an assembler - not the focus of the article. Fantastic Furniture Assembly  —Preceding 21:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial links

message: I was hoping to find that information in this article, but I have no idea where to find out.  Does anyone know? Mander (talk) 12:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The features can be found at Hex key. Its simple about production costs related to benefits/feature. But, such information better fits into the Hex key article. --Kslotte (talk) 08:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does flat pack furniture use hex screws?
Template talk:Big Brother Australia

message: Why was this template moved without consensus or discussion? -- 9cds(talk) 13:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why's it been moved back?  --JD[don't talk|email] 02:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there was no reason given to move it, and no discussion. -- 9cds(talk) 09:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template move 
Talk:Sony Connect

message: Curious to know Sony's positioning of Connect to BurnLounge since they are a major player in the new platform. Anyone have information on this? --Fuzzytek 13:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Sony Japan has announced a total revision of the player software, now known simply as "Connect Player." It is expected to debut in the United States sometime in quarter one of 2006."
It's quarter four 2006. Scepia 06:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  quarter one 2006 

message: Is an EULA copyrighted?  Are we violating copyright by including the EULA in the article? RJFJR (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: EULA
Talk:Tusshar Kapoor

message: Sir apse face to face Milne ka man h please sir Umed yadav manesar (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  For meeting
Talk:1986 Indianapolis 500

message: I believe that the results on this page are incorrect.  For example, I believe that Bettenhausen finished 11th, not Parsons.  I have not changed the article as I don't believe that I have all the necessary data at this time. --Brian G 14:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: This results page is quite inaccurate. Not just Parsons, but I spot several others off the top of my head. Here is a link listing proper results. I would fix it, but I am short on time right now.
http://www.geocities.com/johnsonindy500/indy500/500boxscores/500box86.html
Doctorindy 17:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 
Talk:Genrikh Altshuller

message: This article uses three different romanizations of Altshuller's first name: Genrich, Genrikh, Genrih. Shouldn't we standardize on one? ABehrens 01:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization of Russian names 

message: Along with bringing TRIZ up to scratch, I've reorganised this page, and will add sources forthwith.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 15:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and adding citations
Talk:Spalding High School, Lincolnshire

message: What has ...who is also a member of the Conservative party ...  to do with an article on a school? Surely there must be more things to say about the curriculum, the site, its history etc etc. In addition the present article is very one-sided: the most recent OFSTED report :here shows some shortcomings, notably in Mathematics, ICT and the use of analysis to identify pupils who might be having difficulties or to make efficient planning Peter Shearan 14:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs to be revised.  As it stands it's just a bunch of lists. Data needs to be worked into regular text. --Lendorien 19:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CLEANUP
Portal talk:Formula One/suggestions for selected article

message: Archived on 2 July 2006 by 4u1e 14:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

message: How about Giancarlo Fisichella for the next one? Topical and in fair condition. 4u1e 06:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done 4u1e 17:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. 4u1e 16:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I like Vegasrebel29's suggestion, but would also add notable previous races at a track also be included in the pool.  F1 has a 50+ year history and some epic battles.  And that history also includes constructors and drivers that are no longer around, but are definitely worth a look.  Perhaps Team Lotus would be a good start.  Scottanon 03:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Featuring articles of past circuits, drivers and constructors would be ideal in my mind, as it would push F1's roots to the people, and they could learn where the sport has come from. This would all be down to the quality of articles covering the historical areas of F1. I will have a browse and see if I can find any articles that are up to scratch. Raider2044 Bio • Talk • Contribs 04:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: If you're looking for former drivers, how about Masten Gregory? Not very well known but by all accounts very talented racer (got a podium on debut!)... I expanded this article a while ago, it could probably do with a cleanup but I think the basis is there. Also a few WDC articles could be fixed up to "selected article" status – Emerson Fittipaldi, James Hunt, Ayrton Senna, Alain Prost... AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 04:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The "next event" section features the details on the next track. There is nothing to stop editors adding a summary of the event. This would leave the selected article box free for historic tracks etc. Mark83 11:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree-Damon Hill is a suitable article, however, I think it needs cleaning up first. Flymeoutofhere 07:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Been done already. Mark83 11:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The Gilles Villeneuve article is a pretty good one - how about it for featured article? Bretonbanquet 21:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a strong candidate for featured article status. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Selected article
Talk:Lincoln Minster School

message: references required "state of the art" who said that and when? A start grade is close. A history and infobox? Victuallers 16:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Lincoln Minster School is also renowned in the local area for its line in cheese, of the cheddar variety.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.50.126 (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheese 
Talk:The Statesman's Yearbook

message: I think I fixed the tone of the first sentence to be more neutral.  I think there is a little more work to be done on the current edition section to make it NPOV and get the statements sourced. Dpv 15:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see where you're coming from.  I thought the comments about what will happen in the 2007 edition would have come from a source other than the 2006 edition, but I could be wrong. Dpv 18:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity 

message: Worldcat lists 2 co-editors during the tenure of J.S. Keltie (1883-1926) - I.P.A. Renwick 1895-1910 and M. Epstein 1913-1926, who then took over as editor in 1927.  Should Mr. Renwick also be listed and Mortimer Epstein's dates expanded?  Also S.H. Steinberg and John Paxton shared editorial responsibility for the 1968/1969 and 1969/1970 editions as well. NightBear (talk) 13:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-editors 

message: The text listed under the subheading "Current Edition" refers to the 149th edition printed in 2012. This is no longer correct - and the first sentence should read: The 154th edition of The Statesman's Yearbook was published in October 2017. The citation [1] for this sentence should also be updated to: The Statesman's Yearbook 2018, Palgrave Macmillan UK. The reference should be hyperlinked to: https://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9781137508522.
202.55.67.202 (talk) 06:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Regards, Spintendo      16:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some proposed changes 

message: # Additions made:
## The current edition has been added to the article.
## An infobox was added to the article.
## The Unreferenced template was added to the article.
# Deletions made:
## Unreferenced material was removed from the article.
## The More footnotes template was removed from the article.
# Unchanged items:
## List of editors
:Regards, Spintendo      16:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 24-FEB-2018
Talk:Liberty's Kids

message: i'm not sure but i turned it on and there was a man i think was Edward Rutledge  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeschoolrulez (talk • contribs) 19:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Could someone please make not that Liberty's Kids has been airing on the History Channel as well? That is where I first founded out about it, however I don't know why I discover these things this late. I am beginning to think where the hell I was in 2002 to 2004. Anyways the series is awesome.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.189.20.8 (talk) 01:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Channel 

message: This article is obviously being vandalized.  Someone needs to restore a previous edit on it.  SirThom 14:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As per request, I have reverted the article to a june 16th version, which I am very sure is the appropriate version.--Kenn Caesius 18:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Does anyone have information regarding the accuracy of this series - beyond the obvious? Brendanmccabe (talk) 20:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: One episode keeps nagging at me. This episode on the Mum Bett case. If there is such an episode, why doesn't this article mention Theodore Sedgwick, the attorney in the case?
71.164.209.66 (talk) 03:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: I imagine that this must be a very hotly debated topic, but if James is fourteen by the beginning of the series, wouldn't he be twenty, twenty-one by the end of it? And Henri, being eight would be fifteen.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:4100:1840:808:1848:808:0:7977 (talk • contribs) 23:17, April 23, 2014‎
:...and Charlie Brown is receiving Social Security benefits.
:You are assuming that: 1) One season of the show = one year. 2) The show exists in the real world. How many years has that insufferable Caillou been telling us, "I'm just a kid who's four..."?
:Fiction -- especially kid's fiction -- doesn't work that way. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Kids ages

message: I'm going to correct the title of episode 39, which should be "The Man Who Wouldn’t Be King".   Elsquared (talk) 03:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct title
Talk:The Emerald Forest

message: "who, in his opinion, are destroying the world with their constructions, and abducts the child. Bill Markham pursues them, but his son is gone."
Didn't he call them hte termite people ?or reffer t them a bit diffrntly. this movie is used in psychology classes it would be nice if it was beter documented.
:The Invisible People refer to the loggers as termite people, as they consume all the vegatation and leave devastation behind.  It's been years since I read the novelisation but I believe Tommé also compares the Termite towers to the blocks of flats in the city.  --Davoloid (talk) 10:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

message: There is a novelisation  of the film by Robert Holdstock which had a few differences from the film.  The main one I recall was a poignant moment when Tommé comes to visit his family, he performs a small ritual on his mother, releasing her "sad spirit" by sucking her breast, and releasing a butterfly out onto the balcony.  She then accepts his return to the jungle.
There is also a Diary  
by John Boorman of the making of the film.
(want to check these work and seems relevant before I add to the article.)
--Davoloid (talk) 10:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novelisation and Making of books 

message: It was his son's plan that eventually caused a surge of water to wreck the dam.  The dynamite never went off as I recall.  The text of the story is wrong to say that Markham succeeded in demolishing the dam.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gomez2002 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Markham's Dynamite Did Not Detonate 

message: Does this movie have any connection to the book The Fierce People by Napoleon Chagnon? DancesWithGrues (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chagnon
Talk:Yabba

message: See also Talk:Stephen Gascoigne
A photo of Yabba's statue would be great. Any Sydneysiders going to the SCG, please bring a camera. :-)--Phil Wardle (talk) 07:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A mere three years later, your request has been met. I emailed ABC radio during the 2012 Sydney-India test, and a member of their team (Patrick Foulkes) took some photos and emailed them to me (with appropriate PD release). Many thanks to Patrick. Manning (talk) 02:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sydneysiders
Talk:Air Transport Auxiliary

message: Might be useful to include the number of members of the ATA killed during WWII.  I have seen some war graves of members (including a husband and wife) so know there were losses.  --jmb (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Using Geoff's Search Engine, the Commonwealth War Graves Commission database uncludes 159 names of ATA personnel with war graves or commemorations. Nick Cooper (talk) 09:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Casualties
Talk:Chartered Institute of Taxation

message: It's not normally WP convention for articles to start with "The".   I will move to "Chartered Institute of Taxation" in a week or so unless there are objections.   Psnae 15:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Datsu-A Ron

message: Clean-up indeed. That abstract is bizarre. I can't really tell what's a quotation and what's not -- is the part that calls the Confucian teachings "hypocritical  and shameless" actually the editor's comment?
I agree with the previous poster, this article is messy. A full re-write is needed. Filippo Argenti 01:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel like this ought to be renamed "Leaving Asia", the common English title. What does everyone think? Patrick Schwemmer 06:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: Hi everyone, I am the creator of this article in 2005. Thank you for editing in these years.
The author of Datsu-A Ron did regard Confucianism as "hypocritical and shameless". Please refer to this part of the original text:
この文明日新の活劇場に教育の事を論ずれば儒教主義と云い、学校の教旨は仁義礼智と称し、一より十に至るまで外見の虚飾のみを事として、その実際に於ては真理原則の知見なきのみか、道徳さえ地を払うて残刻(ざんこく)不廉恥(ふれんち)を極め、なお傲然(ごうぜん)として自省の念なき者の如(ごと)し。
I agree that this article should be renamed "Leaving Asia".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pourfemme (talk • contribs) 10:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply from the creator of this article
Talk:Sigfrid of Sweden

message: I have just been told there are 'cite errors' in the latest version of my rewriting of this article (June 2018) I cannot immediately find them. Help, please.Dr Janet Fairweather (talk) 12:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

message: This article is all over the place;-
*Two dead images
*Bad 'attributes' formatting
*Three stub templates (?!?)
*Overall disorganisation
Please give the article a complete rewrite if you know enough about the subject.
thanks - User:Skaterblo aka 86.12.230.89 15:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:London Institute of Banking & Finance

message: Why was this redirected from "Chartered Institute of Bankers", which is the proper legal name?   Psnae 15:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comment

message: Could the title of this article be altered to 'ifs University College' to reflect the institution being awarded 'university college' status in 2013.
This is no longer necessary as the name has changed once more. Gmseow (talk) 10:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|request edit}} Page title 

message: This article contains extremely close paraphrasing, so close that it looks like cut-and-paste with minor structural changes, of material on the subjects website, such as About us, Our heritage and ifs Student Investor Challenge, as a quick sample. NebY (talk) 12:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close paraphrasing 

message: Could the title of this article be altered to 'The London Institute of Banking & Finance' to reflect the institution rename as of 15 September 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marketingifs (talk • contribs) 13:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update page title
Talk:HMS Valiant (1914)

message: This article claims repairs after a frogman attack were made in South Africa, the article on "Human Torpedos" claims the repairs were made in Norfolk, VA --- this is not congruous and needs to be corrected.
:You seem to have misread the Human Torpedo article.  It states that HMS Queen Elizabeth was sent to Norfolk for repairs, which it was and doesn't specify where Valiant was repaired.  --Harlsbottom 11:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repairs 

message: Is it interesting to note that the then Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark, later Prince Philip the Duke of Endinburgh served onboard HMS Valiant as a midshipsman?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.230.46.130 (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Philip 

message: It is unclear what books are meant by the references to:
# Sutherland
# Beevor (probably Antony Beevor but book unclear)
# Jones
Gusfriend (talk) 06:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear references
Talk:Who Is It (Michael Jackson song)

message: Can anyone create/upload an audio sample of the song? Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 09:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 14:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio sample? 

message: its been confirmed that Michael Jackson had involvement in Sonic 3, and when you speed up "Who Is It," it sounds like Ice Cap Zone. This should be talked about. Numerous videos on YouTube with comparisons confirm this.Tallicfan20 (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually "Who Is It?" is one of the more tenuous links. The Jam link is more obvious and the Stranger in Moscow link is confirmed by someone who worked with MJ on both Sonic 3 and Stranger in Moscow. Point being, I don't know if this is the article to mention it. Also, there may be legal repercussions of attaching MJ's credit to something either he or Sega clearly didn't want him creditted on. 96.236.112.210 (talk) 22:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic 3 

message: This Song was planned with Give In To Me,In The Closet,Dangerous,Dirty Diana and Remember The Time for the Dangerous World Tour.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.50.33.93 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangerous Tour 

message: The single was released in the summer of 1992 in Europe. Perhaps June but certainly by early July. It entered the Netherlands chart four weeks prior to August 1, 1992, which was July 4. In the UK, it entered the charts two weeks prior to July 26.
It was released in the USA around March 1993. It entered the US charts shortly thereafter. Binksternet (talk) 05:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date?
Talk:Bedhaya

message: ++Lar: t/c 15:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This portion here from the Interpretation section includes the following, which looks like  quote that refers to a video or series of photographs not present here. Consider removing this section. 
:Judith Becker provides a tantric interpretation. The first position shows desire plus the body; the second shows opposition between desire and the chakras (there is some evidence that the legs were considered a fifth chakra), and in the final section, interaction between the head and desire. Afterwards, desire is absorbed into the body, and then the dancers are arranged in the same arrangement as offerings in the Majapahit palace. Three is a number rich in Hindu symbolism, like the three pramanas, the Trilokya or the Trimurti, so a threefold set of three symbolizes completion and perfection.[15]
Digitalblister 12:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The passage in question refers to the positions given in the dance section and corresponds with the descriptions there. It would be better with photos or diagrams, but I think it still makes sense on its own. Rigadoun 17:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I thought Felicia Hughes Freeland and Clara Brakel had done something on this as well? User:SatuSuro 10:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation
Talk:Eat Bulaga!

message: I have closed the discussion but someone more experienced with the article should complete the merge itself (copying the relevant text from E.A.T. article before redirecting it). Tagging RMXY who started this discussion. Soni (talk)  01:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to be sure, we're merging the 2 articles about the TV5 show starting from July 2023 into one article, at the very least. Is that right? Howard the Duck (talk) 19:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. Assuming you mean E.A.T. (TV program) and Eat Bulaga! (and not something else I completely missed somehow) Soni (talk)  19:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that's right. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completing the merge 

message: I firmly believe that my revision dated 26th of January 2024 was of much better quality than the succeeding revisions. Why was it reverted so much? Image2012 (talk) 06:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: Whoever removed the merge template in the article DID NOT read the WP:MERGE properly. Please put it back until the discussion is closed, and whether or not it will be merged. 107.185.128.255 (talk) 04:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Merge Suggestion Template Without Final Consensus 

message: Can we move the portion about "Lenten Drama Special" in this article? Currently, the portion can be found in TAPE Inc.'s wiki article entitled "Eat Bulaga! Lenten Drama Specials". EJA9398 (talk) 06:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you'll need to changed as "Special Episodes" not your planning to change to header to "Eat Bulaga! Lenten Drama Specials", because the show aired a drama anthology for holy week special. Matthew24kyle (talk) 00:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "Lenten Drama Special" portion