Talk:Claudine Barretto

message: I added the latest news on barretto's involvement in the Francswiss scam.
--Florentino floro 08:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: I'm sorry, but you guys are spelling her last name wrong, it's Barreto, with only one t. Ask her yourself, that's how she spells it, my cousin works for ABS-CBN and is her friend so I'm sure of it. But it's ok because even the people at ABS-CBN misspell it, but it should be only one t.
:1)There is no proof  of what you say. 2) 'She' may prefer one t but that doesn't change here real name. 3) Her name is all over the internet and so easy to check. 4) Her sisters are equally famous and  thus easy to reference for her name.--Jondel (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling of her last name 

message: Is there any reason why she shouldn't be categorized under the Barretto family?--Jondel (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Barretto family

message: Please don't include http://goodtimesmanila.com/2009/03/06/official-titles-of-piolo-juday-claudine-marian-dingdong-etc-released/ as one of her awards since the site is a joke blog. Anything in the blog in not true as confessed by the blog owner him/herself. The blog has a disclaimer at the side of the page. Don't be confused.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.204.83 (talk) 16:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Entertainment Awards

message: Please delete "She dubbed as "The Optimum Teleserye Queen"" in Claudine Barretto's page since it has been superseeded by the title given to Judy Ann Santos which is Face of Soap Opera & Queen of Teleserye. Said title was given to Barretto by Star Magic-a homebased training and management program of their mother station, ABS-CBN who is now proclaiming Santos as the Face of Soap Opera and the only Queen of Teleserye.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.204.83 (talk) 13:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libellious Case in Claudine Barretto's page 

message: Claudine Barretto's page is always being edited by her fans as viewed in the history contributor "Claudinians" is always inserting poorly sourced and sometimes libelous info/tags in the page. Some of the parts of the page are also redundancy of the other parts. Plus the description: Claudine Margaret Castelo Barretto-Santiago (born July 20, 1979), popularly known as Claudine Barretto is an award winning and multi-nominated film and television actress and product endorser in the Philippines; is just patterened to Judy Ann Santos's page. Please do necessary actions on this.  
125.60.204.83 (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malicious Page-Claudine Barretto' page 

message: It looks like that the Notes & Awards indicated in the aforementioned part are already mentioned in the earlier part of the page under "Film & Television Career. It's already not necessary to include that part (Notes & Awards) or may just delete the first part. It seems that it was just included to have it appeared enormously embellished. But apparently, that is a big superfluous. Have this cleaned-up coz it looks like a fan page.
125.60.204.82 (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claudine Barretto's Filmography 

message: It was previously reported that this page is being edited biasedly by her fans w/ username "Claudinians" making the page a fansite rather that an encyclopedic entry. Please do appropriate action/s since such contributor is persistently bulking up the page by adding unofficial/libellous tags/infomation.125.60.204.84 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  @ Claudinian, I don't understand your way of editing. You have been told time, and time again that you cannot simply revert massive amounts of info, and delete sentences, without giving any reasoning towards doing so. It's getting to the point of extreme irritability. You are showcasing signs of WP:DE. You were given a notice on the WP:ANI, and you still did not change your ways. You refuse to discuss anything with anyone, and instead continue doing your own editing, with exact knowledge that it may jeopardize this article. Unless you begin to change the way you edit, and enagage in open discussions with users, I will be forced to contact an administrator, once again, and see if they can help with this situation. Wiki pseud 08:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Claudinian" 

message: In "Film and Television Career" it is stated that the first film of Claudine Barretto from Seiko Film are Kumusta Ka, Aking Mahal?, Taong Gubat, Pulis Patola and Kung Sakali Man but these movies are not indicated in Claudine Barretto's Filmography that's why I included the movies in her filmography.
Barreto's first three films under Seiko were Kumusta Ka, Aking Mahal?, Taong Gubat and Pulis Patola. She was paired with newcomer Emil Benedicto. She also did Kung Sakali Man. Although an exclusive Seiko contract star before, she was still allowed to accept two assignments with Star Cinema, Home Along Da Riles (The Movie) and May Minamahal.
Thnks..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudinian (talk • contribs) 02:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claudine Barretto's Filmography 

message: In "Film and Television Career" it is stated that the first film of Claudine Barretto from Seiko Film are Kumusta Ka, Aking Mahal?, Taong Gubat, Pulis Patola and Kung Sakali Man but these movies are not indicated in Claudine Barretto's Filmography that's why I included the movies in her filmography.
Barreto's first three films under Seiko were Kumusta Ka, Aking Mahal?, Taong Gubat and Pulis Patola. She was paired with newcomer Emil Benedicto. She also did Kung Sakali Man. Although an exclusive Seiko contract star before, she was still allowed to accept two assignments with Star Cinema, Home Along Da Riles (The Movie) and May Minamahal.
Thnks..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudinian (talk • contribs) 17:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claudine Barretto's Filmography 

message: Based on the Philippine Television, Claudine Barretto is hailed as the Optimum Star, how come it is not indicated in her article? 
--Claudinian (talk) 17:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  She was never hailed as such. And no distinction whatsoever has been laid out indicating that she is a so called Optimum Star. This is just a fan-based titular provision and not acclaimed by any media of any sort (unlike titles such as Superstar, Star of All Seasons, Diamond Star, Megastar, Young Superstar). Repeated changes made will merit you automatic and permanent ban. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claudine Barretto's title: "Optimum Star" 

message: The next TV production of Claudine barretto is "Claudine: Alzhiemer episode" that's why I included it to her article.
Thanks
--Claudinian (talk) 17:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Again until you place a reference or citation indicating the confirm title of such, this will remain as is. Please provide appropriate article citing the title and relevant details. But until then, do not revert or alter anything. This article is not a fan article, this is encyclopedic. You are writing on a fan's POV which is loosely based on opinions and idolatry. We need to set a neutral tone on this article, and what you are doing does not clearly help at all. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hey, you can't use wiki to promote anything. However, if it is encyclopedic and has press references then it is alright but you would need to cite those references.Wiki is an encyclopedia at heart.--Jondel (talk) 02:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claudine's Anthology 2010 

message: How come the twitter account of claudine indicated in her article is not working (www.twitter.com/claudinbarretto)? The real twitter account of Claudine Barretto is www.twitter.com/dineybarretto not claudinbarretto. 
 
--Claudinian (talk) 17:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  This has been corrected in the infobox. Wiki pseud (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claudine Barretto's Twitter account 

message: The article needs more citations, particularly regarding the various awards she has won. --Diannaa TALK 22:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your additions to the article.  I have edited out the un-encyclopedic content such as flowery praise and descriptions of her roles.  These are not acceptable as per WP:MOS.  Another great resource can be found at wp:ACTOR#Filmography tables. Diannaa TALK 18:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Claudine Barretto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140202174249/http://www.pep.ph/news/25334/--The--YES!--List-ranks-the-Movie to http://www.pep.ph/news/25334/--The--YES!--List-ranks-the-Movie
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101206011408/http://ikuwaderno.com/yes-magazine%e2%80%99s-100-most-beautiful-stars-of-2010.html to http://ikuwaderno.com/yes-magazine%E2%80%99s-100-most-beautiful-stars-of-2010.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110412000456/http://www.zoomartis.net:80/2011/04/ziana-zain-top-10-hot-asian-moms.html to http://www.zoomartis.net/2011/04/ziana-zain-top-10-hot-asian-moms.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article as it stands has been plagued and vandalized with unsourced and fancruft edits with alarming concerns as outlined:
*The tone and style does not in any way reflect WP:MOS
*The neutrality of this article is disputed
*Attempts, or lack thereof, for a cleanup have been futile
It is suggested that this be nominated for speedy deletion Itssheenabautista (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I put it back to a PROD notice. None of what you have wrote above has any relation to a valid WP:CSD criteria. No comment on PROD. !dave 18:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , it seems that from my review the article falls under:
* G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes;
* G5. Creations by banned or blocked users
I am considering nominating it if you don't have any opposition on the above criteria? Itssheenabautista (talk) 18:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Um...no, it's neither. The page creator is not blocked, and pure vandalism is creating a page that says something along the lines of 'I like poop egyEQYWGRGREGA'#####'. Please, remove the tag. !dave 19:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion for [[Claudine Barretto]] 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion