lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ogre Battle Gaiden: Prince of Zenobia

message: Previously the line was...
"With the exception of new areas, Ogre Battle: Legend of the Zenobia Prince is almost identical to March of the Black Queen in appearance and game play."
But then it was changed to... 
"With the exception of some added new areas..."
I think the latter implies that the original game's areas are played through again in this game, and that a few new areas are just scattered within. Is this the case? I haven't noticed it if so, but to handle this properly, screen-shot comparisons can be found on the following sites:
Ogre Battle
Ogre Battle Gaiden
The closest I've noticed are that scenes 4 and 9 from the latter sort of resemble The Kalbian Peninsula ("Snow Fields") and Antalia ("Imprisonment") from Ogre Battle. Is there something that can prove that these -- or any other levels in Gaiden -- are the same maps as the ones from the first game? (I realize that they could be).
Unless there is, I think the statement should be either the original, or the current version:
"With the exception of the new areas..." --4.249.81.56 15:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Areas 

message: ^ Would I be right in assuming this is the original Japanese title and its English translation? If so, if the game was never released in English as the article states, where does the "Legend of the Zenobia Prince" title come from? (I wouldn't know if this is some accepted fan thing; I hadn't even heard of the series until about ten minutes ago) Bonkywop (talk) 04:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: i just came across this... that's really strange. i have no idea where this title could possibly come from, maybe an old announcement of a planned localization? 75.177.119.25 (talk) 03:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

text: I suggest renaming the page since the current title has no source and was never officially localized. "Ogre Battle Gaiden: Prince of Zenobia" should suffice since it's a correct translation of the actual title of the game, falls in line with the existing localizations, and gaiden is already a well known gaming term.--LordVanya (talk) 04:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(伝説のオウガバトル外伝 ゼノビアの皇子 Densetsu no Ōga Batoru Gaiden Zenobia no Ōji,? Another Tale of the Legendary Ogre Battle: The Prince of Zenobia)"
Talk:Power Office Girls

message: This page lacks a spoiler warning, yet gives away the end of the series. :-( Toru-chan 13:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: I noticed asianwiki.com/Power_Office_Girls_4 mentions that there was a 2013 season. Anyone have information about that? Also I could not find the manga covered on animeNewsNetwork. If it has an entry that would make a good addition to the external links. Ranze (talk) 22:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 4
Talk:Lost literary work

message: This article should either be moved to lost literary works or cover lost films and lost artworks as well. The latter two clearly count as works, so there's no reason for an article at this title to be written as if that were not the case. Glades12 (talk) 14:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: Since the article includes Diodorus Siculus and Livy, it should also include Tacitushttps://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=4199 https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/tacitus-book-4/ https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/historians-ancient-biographies/tacitus https://lost-works.fandom.com/wiki/Annals_(Tacitus). Mcljlm (talk) 02:30, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical world: Tacitus? 

message: This article lists the destruction of Terry Pratchett's unfinished works as a 20th century incident. It may be time for somebody to start a new 21st century section in this article, because the Terry Pratchett incident occurred in the 2010s after Pratchett died from complications due to Alzheimer's. His unfinished works were destroyed by request on 25 August 2017, in a well-documented event involving a steamroller, of all things. In any case, this did not happen in the 20th century. PetSematary182 (talk) 04:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Terry Pratchett incident 

message: In the ‘Lost works in popular culture’ section, it states:
“H. P. Lovecraft wrote that all the original Arabic copies of The Necronomicon (Al Azif) have been destroyed, as well as the Arabic to Greek translations. Only five Greek to Latin translations are held by libraries, though copies may exist in private collections.”
However, the wiki page for The Necronomicon states that The Necronomicon is a fictional work.
Am I misunderstanding or is there a mistake here?
Thanks,
DK DKing1908 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lovecraft’s The Necronomicon 

message: This page has become difficult to navigate due to the long length of the Lost Works section. I would like to recommend restructuring the Lost Works by section in order to make it more readable, this would comprise of separating the list into 4 distinct sections: Antiquity, Middle Ages, Modern Age & Literary Collections/Libraries, I think this would help make the page a bit more manageable in terms of navigation as it’s simply too difficult to find specific titles in the page’s current state. Any thoughts would be much appreciated. InternetEnigma (talk) 09:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult to navigate 

message: “Many Inca Quipus (an ancient device used for record keeping and communication) were burned by Spanish priests in 1583 on the orders of the Third Council of Lima.Frank L. Salomon, 2004: The Cord Keepers. Khipus and Cultural Life in a Peruvian Village; Duke University Press;  Only 751 quipus are known to have survived to the present.”
This, as appears in the article, is directly contradicted by the Wikipedia page on the Third Council of Lima. How should this be handled? Ed is the standard text editor (talk) 04:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information
Talk:Lakmé

message: Expanded header a bit and rewording to include flower duet and bell songteinesaVaii (talk) 05:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  header 

message: Would it be possible to add a reception section? I have a hard time finding material to add; however I would like to include this.
~~~~ 207.5.38.44 (talk) 00:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception?
Talk:The "What Time Is Love?" Story

message: Now we've split this out into an article I wonder why we ever doubted it in the first place :-) It's a cracking good start and a pleasant read. --Do not edit this comment on Wednesdays between 1 and 3 pm - The Mgmt 21:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Splendido. Good call. Hopefully Doctorin' The Tardis will make similar good sense. --Vinoir 21:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm listening to K.L.F.S. now. Sounds like a KLF remix to me. --kingboyk 22:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great job 

message: This article just doesn't seem to justify being a good article at all. It's too small, not broad enough, confusing to new readers (especially those who haven't read the What Time Is Love? article), and just doesn't match the standard of Good Articles. Please use other Good Articles as models. Also, if you haven't already, please see the Failed GA rationale on Talk:Justified and Ancient since it mostly applies here too.
:I think it should be taken as a prerequisite that anyone who reads this will click on the WTIL? and read about the song first. However, I think in this case you're probably right. It is rather short. We should provide some commentary on the versions, and a brief overview of the song so that it stands alone better. Thanks very much again for your feedback. --kingboyk 01:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed Good Article 

message: The "Land of Oz" version is... well, that classic riff in it's most primitive form, Chill Out/Orb era samples (Dr Alex Joins The JAMs I suppose), crowd noise, quite a satisfying beat. Rather psychedelic overall. I think an audio sample would be a good addition to this article. --kingboyk 22:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aceed
Talk:Libyan Desert

message: I'm fascinated by this statement, but there are no cross-references or references on this point. Can someone elaborate?
CarmenAutre (talk) 01:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monsoon Season a result of Saharan aridity?? 

message: The title to a section is listed as world war two, and lists two plane crashes. One of which occured during world war two. And the other occured during 1935. Unless I'm grossly misinformed WWII did not start until 1939-41, as a twenty year armstice was in place during 1935. So maybe changing the header to "Plane Crashes" or "Early 18th Century Exploration" would work better. I would but a revert bot would probably get it. 18:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, not to mention that this desert's involvement in WWII deserves an article of its own merit. loads of things happened here. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've (sort of) resolved the 1935 crash anomaly, as it didn't occur in the Libyan Desert at all, but in the Nile Delta. So I have deleted it from here and merged it into the Wadi Natrun page, which is where it occurred. Moonraker12 (talk) 22:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1935 French Plane Crash/WWII 

message: Needs a modern map to outline where this actually is! Fig (talk) 14:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. I just wanted to know roughly where the Western Desert is, relative to modern country boundaries. This website may not be reliable, but has a nice map. It contradicts the definitions here, showing the Western Desert as distinct part the Libyan Desert, rather than their being synonyms. The text of the website contradicts the map, as the map shows it stops at the Egyptian/Libyan border, while a quote suggests it extends into Libya. This tourism website says "Since the second world war the north-eastern part of the Libyan desert, lying in Egypt, is usually referred to as the Western Desert (that is, lying to the west of the Nile)." If the meaning was revised only after WWII, that would explain the contradiction with the Wikipedia article, which cites only a 1939 source, and may explain the contradictory quote on the website with the map. Agyle (talk) 19:20, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done... I've added an explanation for this anomaly in a re-write (see below); the names have changed their meaning during he 20th century. And we have an article on the Western Desert of Egypt now. Also, I've put in a map which shows the Libyan Sahara. I hope that is useful... Moonraker12 (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: This page could do with a re-write: For a start it needs sections on geography and climate, seeing as it's a geographical subject. Also, it says nothing about the desert in Libya itself (which the title would suggest) and the definition is a little out of date. So I am re-writing it; I trust that is OK with everyone. Moonraker12 (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Surplice

message: In Cambridge and Oxford colleges the surplice is worn by congregation members just over their regular clothes, when attending evensong. Do we think this comment ought to be added. It is certainly not the case that the surplice is 'always' worn over a cassock.
:It would be wrong to say that the surplice is always worn over a cassock — although that is by far the more usual manner in which it is worn. I would imagine that the tradition of wearing surplice without cassock in Oxbridge (does this refer to the majority of colleges?) is a faulty rubric that assumed that the congregation would normally wear cassock as their 'ordinary clothes'. Religious who wear the surplice often wear it over their habit. — Gareth Hughes 13:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't the comment about the surplice being worn over a cassock appear in the RC section only?  The practice described refers to the Anglican Colleges at Oxford and Cambridge and the cassock has never been legally required in the C of E (the canons of 1604 allow a "coat" as an alternative for wearing in public)--Jpacobb (talk) 23:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surplus being worn alone 

message: It should rightly be mentioned as an older word for the surplice. 
Sigh.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.210.155 (talk) 05:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is "overslop" forbidden?
Talk:Pierre Marteau

message: Hi Olaf,
I have a question. How important was Marteau in terms of output and sales, compared to other publishers? I have read The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France (1995) by Robert Darnton and I can't remember coming across Marteau.
BTW, great article, were you the first to touch upon Marteau in your book? And regarding your book, is an English version in the works?
P.S. there is an error in the rendering of the code in this fragment: "A second branch". The 'A' is not rendered although it's there in the source code.
--Jahsonic 17:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You touch the most stupid mistake of my life: not to write this book in English. Yet 714 pages would have killed me. The mistake is greater since I wrote half of that book on the English market. You find a translator and I'll be happy. Karl Klaus Walther did work on Marteau before. My own book is rather about the European market of books - primarily novels - on the European market, than on Marteau. The output of the German Marteau is well known, that of the French will be the mystery at the moment, yet I assume he was more productive than any of his rivals after 1650 (due to the fact that he was many). --Olaf Simons 20:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this. This is obviously a late 19tn, ealy 20th century pront. May be the content is older. But it needs to be clarified what this is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olaf Simons (talk • contribs) 09:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Image
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Robotrippin

message: I'm unsure of whether or not I'm supposed to add to the page, since there's already been a deletion discussion in the past, but I've done it anyway. If I wasn't supposed to, please delete it and put the article up for deletion properly. Thanks! --Muugokszhiion 18:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Mobile and Ohio Railroad

message: Is there a definitive list of the former Class I railroads? If so, was the M&O one? Was it a Class II? LeRoi 15:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen one yet; in fact, the closest that I've seen is the list in .  I suspect that M&O may have at one time been classified as Class I, but I don't have an appropriate reference handy. Slambo (Speak) 17:42, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Former Class I?

message: Expanded from a two-line stub with source.  Altairisfartalk 00:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded
Talk:Tollygunge

message: As part of the disambiguation link repair project (You can help!), please could someone with a greater knowledge on the subject than myself change the East India Company link to the relevant company (the different companies are listed here). Thank you, mattbr30 18:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which East India Company? 

message: India  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.168.254 (talk) 22:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking For Friends
Talk:Michael Des Barres

message: From where does the Des Barres title of marquis originate? If it's a British title, shouldn't the title be Marquess rather than Marquis? LordVetinari (talk) 04:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Hello my name is kano 222.153.89.2 (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports
Talk:Stephan Dweck

message: This is accurate information, taken from Amazon.com.  Stephan Dweck is a published author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flashyphil (talk • contribs) 
:frighteningly enough, the author is correct.  The page could use a little cleanup (way too many redlinks), but it is correct. --Bachrach44 18:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is he also related to jewelry? 'Cause I get a bunch of hits related to that when I use google...:O Cheers. Imperat§ r(Talk) 00:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: See my talk page --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he dead?
Talk:Tony Oliva

message: I've seen 1938 (baseball-reference.com), 1940 (here and baseballlibrary.com) and 1941 (baseball cube).
Which is it?  66.63.144.242 18:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be 1938 - which this page reflects.  The issue is that he used his brother's name when he first came up (who was younger) and that confused the issue. Not unlike what other recent Latino players have done - you hide your age which makes you look like more of a prospect and therefore worth more dough, ray, me. Ckruschke (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: Tony Oliva's name (here, in BBref and Baseball-Almanac) are Antonio Oliva Lopez Hernandes Javique. There is no reference to the name Javique anywhere, and both his SabrBio  and his biography by Henninger  refer to him having been born Pedro Jr. after his father, and only got the name Antonio after getting a passport with his brothers (Antonio) birth certificate.
I feel fairly confident that his birth name is Pedro Oliva López Hernández Oliva, but am hesitant to change it due to the visibility of his name and that lots of places has his name as Antonio. There's also different stories of Oliva using his brothers passport  not his birth certificate (to get a passport).
I just want a second opinion before making any of those changes. Do I trust his biography and Sabr bio?
Hamma085 (talk) 19:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name discrepancies
Talk:Bobby Ray Inman

message: This isn't the news conference, but it cites the whole debate and gives it a time frame.
 Drinkard, Jim. “Inman: Dole Plotted With Columnist to Hurt Nomination”. National Public Radio, Jan 18, 1994.
The fact, as the wiki page states, that Inman said "conspiracy" during a press conference, is just sensationalism. This refers to the charges and counter charges. there are other articles, etc.
I have never made a citation, and don't want to mess up the wiki page. Thanks.
Nuclear1 (talk) 02:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here is the missing "citation needed" <--- can someone fix this, please? 

message: In 1982 Inman was the founding CEO of MCC in Austin Texas and served there for 5 years. I just put the former fact on the MCC page. He then joined a venture capital holding company whose name I forget, which I believe did not last as long as MCC. He also reportedly won one of the game shows as a boy or young man, $64,000 question perhaps, and was known to have an incredibly good memory. I'm not planning to research and edit this.
Jgrudin (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gap in Inman's biography 
Talk:Skirdustan

message: Material is generally accepted as being in Community Ownership (Aberlour Community Association). Originally a talk given by the Doctor in the village (now deceased) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Norlaggan (talk • contribs) 
:It's against Wikipedia policy to simply copy content from elsewhere, even if it is in the public domain. Frame it as a quotation, perhaps, and please use standard Wikipedia formatting. Sorry for assuming it was a copyright violation - I see that this is a good faith attempt to create a useful article; good luck! :) — flamingspinach | (talk) 18:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Emma Kirkby

message: Born February 26 1949. According to this site, she was born in "Canbridge"
http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Kirkby-Emma.htm
According to this site she was born in Camberley
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0456581/
According to this site she was born in Cambridge
http://www.avroklassiek.nl/luisterkamer/klassiekkalender/050226.asp
Fusspot 18:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth

message: According to Wikipedia, the Taverner Consort and Players was founded in 1978. According to the Taverner.org website, the 30th anniversary took place in 2003. So how could Ms Kirkby have joined the choir in 1971? --RichardVeryard 12:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taverner Choir
Talk:Downtown 81

message: This article needs to mention more of the important music in the film besides DNA. JohnRussell 18:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FYI there is a soundtrack out now. Benjiboi 02:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack released 
Template talk:Ruswelcome

message: Please do not forget to subst: this template instead of including it.  Use:
 
Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 18:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does that matter? --Irpen 18:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a Wikipedia guideline.  See Wikipedia:Template substitution for more details.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 18:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Missouri Coteau

message: In Canadian schools I was taught "the Missouri Couteau", and its meaning as I recall it was not the higher prairie west of it, but the strip of descending land between the higher lands west of it and those lower ones to the east.  A couteau is a knife-cut in French, a slice, something cut; it's not something flat.  It's interesting that, as it seems, on the use side the full French-form name is used ("du Couteau") but in Canadian English it's usually just the Missouri Couteau.  And it doesn't refer to the plateau above it, but to that plateau's edge.  From what I recall anyway, can't provide an immediate source, just happened to notice this.  Alberta and maybe Saskatchewan Wikiprojects, if any, should probably also be added, and the opening line adjusted for the different meaning/usage I've provided, which should be common enough in any standard Canadian geography textbook.Skookum1 21:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Coteau is a small hill or a hillside or a hilly upland including the divide between two valleys; a divide or the side of a valley. . One researcher also defines coteau as a high prairie. There are also several definitions of Coteau du Missouri. One is the plateau (the most popular) and the other the hills edging the (eastern edge) plateau as you described. ......Kayoty 08:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The ''Coteau du Missouri'', or Missouri Plateau