Talk:Lalande 21185

message: Can someone edit, please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 07:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Horrible English

message: In this revision, material copied from the copyrighted website SolStation (specifically this page) was added to the article. Per WP:CP I reverted the article to the version before the copyrighted material was added. Icalanise (talk) 21:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had to revert the article again because more material copied from SolStation was added in this revision. There are several instances where the text added in the revision was the same as SolStation's, with a couple of substituted words. Icalanise (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problems 

message: I've removed the planetary system section. I don't think this should be restored until it comes with some legitimate references (at least one paper in a refereed journal, and an entry in a notable database, like the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia.   — Aldaron • T/C   17:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed planetary system section 

message: I have removed the statements and category identifying this star as a flare star from the article as this is not supported by the primary references. SIMBAD and VizieR list this star as a flare star but this does not seem to be consistent with their two primary references. One reference lists this star in a table as an example of a quiet star of this variable type and the other reference does not mention this star specifically at all. My guess is the information is automatically harvested from the articles and is not carefully reviewed. This is a rather important factor considering the effect flaring events would have on any planets that may be in the habitable zone of this nearby star.  Aldebaran66 (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flare star evidence 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Lalande 21185. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090721084438/http://www.thomaspynchon.com/mason-dixon/extra/lalande.html to http://www.thomaspynchon.com/mason-dixon/extra/lalande.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The red circle in the infobox map locates the star into the Leo Minor constellation (not Ursa Major). A mistake? --Vachovec1 (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! I've attempted to rectify the chart. Praemonitus (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mistake in the map? 

message: We need pictures of this planet. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.222.165.93 (talk) 05:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: The distance to earth is listed on the article as 2.5461 ± 0.0002 pc. However, Cal Tech's IPAC (listing the star as GJ 411) has the distance listed as 5.767 ± 0.006 pc, as accessed on 29 Jan 2022.
Link: https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/overview/GJ%20411%20b#star_GJ-411_collapsible
67.214.227.2 (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance to Earth 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion