Talk:Rishi

message: The spelling varies wildly between "rishi" and "Rishi" throughout. Unify! Wegesrand (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalized? 

message: The following addition has been reverted for the fourth time in row (3 times by me, 1 time by Vandamonde:
:"Rishis are a seeker of enlightenment, who try to connect with the supreme being through meditation. Rishis are elevated humans who may sometimes ultimately connect with the supreme being through enlightenment. They may also receive direct guidance from God. Post-Vedic tradition regards the Rishis as "sages" or saints, constituting a peculiar class of human beings who have received enlightenment direct from God, in some cases rishis may also refer to Abrahamic prophets as mentioned in the earliest Vedas"
There are several problems with this "info":
* The lead is supposed to summarize the article; this "info" is not in the article. 
* It's not about the historical rishis, but about a contemporary understanding or interpretation of "rishis". As such, it needs references.
** "Rishis are a seeker of enlightenment" - rishis were poets who invoked the gods. The term "enlightenment" is a modern, western term, not a Vedic term;
** "who try to connect with the supreme being through meditation" - meditation was most likely not part of the Vedic rituals;
** "who may sometimes ultimately connect" - this is unintelligent; what does this sentence mean?
** "connect with the supreme being through enlightenment" - this is a specific understanding of what "enlightenment means;
** "They may also receive direct guidance from God" - like the Jewish profets?
** "in some cases rishis may also refer to Abrahamic prophets as mentioned in the earliest Vedas" - I'm looking forward to the sources which establish this kind of connection between the Abrahamic profets and the Vedas.
All of this needs to be sourced. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Such arguements should be avoided, see this and that. Also, if we take tyhis arguement into consideration, but this is not proper reason. Please don't start edit war, for the reasons which seems totally improper and the edits seems to be POV pushing. Please you were the one who changed the sequence, you should please provide the reason. It was already also Neutrality. Also some comments like What if Gautama Buddha........  seems too inappropriate. Is it like, here you are not for religion, no one is of speific religion, as of me. Are you here for religion. Do you really do it for proving your religious ideology superior. Edit Wikipedia neutrally,pleease. You can surely have interest in specific topic, but such being the representative of religious ideology and repreasenting it seems too improper? Your such comments look like you are here categorising other editors into religious categories. No edit should be done for religion. It should be your interest not your religion here. JaMongKut (talk) 10:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
Closure requested 19:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per nom. The prime minister is not the primary topic, neither is the Sanskrit term. The former arguably has a stronger case than the latter, but neither is clearly a ptopic. These are the situations where it's best to dabify. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Support - no primary topic, so disambiguation is preferred over hatnote. Couruu (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Support but I'd use (title) instead of the proposed format. Term makes it sound like something that's hard to describe, like a religious concept but it's clearly a title of sorts. Killuminator (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 July 2023 

message: https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Rishi indicates that in September '23, there was a total incoming traffic of 10.2k, total outgoing 1.7k, and in there there were 78 identified clickstreams of Rishi Sunak at #5, and 61 of Rishi (disambiguation) at #9. In total that's about 8% of outgoing clickstreams and about 1.35% of the total views. --Joy (talk) 19:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  followup to previous move discussion