lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Session (computer science)

message: This article has been proposed for merging with Session (computer science) for about 3 years. I agree with this merger. Any thoughts? --KarlB (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Seeing no objection, I merged all of session management into session (computer science). --DavidCary (talk) 03:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Here is one link - this one to Oracle - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15051_01/wls/docs103/webapp/sessions.html
G. Robert Shiplett 21:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please merge session id article as well - as a section in the parent 

message: Perhaps it should have been a reference to the book.
USA has http://books.google.com/books?id=zEWvS-sTiNUC
and Canada has a preview at http://books.google.ca/books?id=zEWvS-sTiNUC
G. Robert Shiplett 21:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link broken 

message: I think saying CGI Programs use CGISESSID as an identifier für cookies is misleading, because it depends on the actual implementation which ID for cookies is used. CGI only discribes an interface between webserver and web-application, not the protocol between server and client. --85.16.71.3 (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CGI Session ID 

message: Isn't there a mathematical dimension to stateful sessions?
For example, "What is the minimum number of communications required for two computers to be assured within constraints X,Y, and Z, that they are aware of one another and ready to communicate with one another?"
I believe I have seen in my lifetime, formalisms of connections.
Yet, this article is entirely about, "Here's how sessions work in technology X."
I think that for the wikipedia article here to be encyclopedic, it needs to include the abstract formalism.  But I don't know what it's called.
LionKimbro (talk) 23:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communications Theory? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Jsessionid. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 15#Jsessionid until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jsessionid" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Jacob Davis (inventor)

message: Instead of the awkward "Jewish Hating" wouldnt "antisemitic" be better? Or, I think, the best way to go would be to eliminate this tag altogether.  If his upbringing had anything at all to do with his historical significance, I could see it, but as is, it is simply an out-of-place unwarranted and unnecessary detail.  Just my two cents.  Kjdamrau 04:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the link to thongs, because it goes to a disambiguation page that doesn't list any type of thong this article could be referring to. Itsmeiam (talk) 04:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed "thongs" to "rivets" as I think thats what it is supposed to be, and the person who changed it did not state a reason why. Itsmeiam (talk) 04:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copper Thongs

message: The Levi Co. biography does not mention harnesses, but instead says Davis used the rivets on saddle blankets. 
Why would a tailor make harnesses? Aren't harnesses made of leather? Ileanadu (talk) 04:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harnesses? 

message: What does this mean:
:He also held his business for about 3-4 years before losing his position.
Is this a reference to the tailoring in Reno? Ileanadu (talk) 03:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably work to go to the referenced site. Does that help?Bosredsox24 (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Sentence re his business - confusing 

message: Jacob Davis (inventor) and Jacob Youphes (Jacob W, Davis) --Centovalli (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this motion. Bosredsox24 (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Komańcza Republic

message: Languages:  please keep referrences to both Ukrainian and Lemko, I added internal links.  I think this article explains some reasons people consider Lemko to be a language, and others consider it to be a dialect.  I don't think that there is any definite way to say when a dialect becomes a language, so this point could be argued indefinitely.Pustelnik 13:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Net (substance)

message: The beginning of this entry says it's Cu-Sb, but further on and Nova's episode on Newton's alchemy say it is Cu-Fe. Which is it? On a related note, if Cu-Fe, how does it relate to bornite? --Belg4mit 21:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula 

message: I have found quite a few sources talking about "the net" substance in the context of Newton's chemical and alchemical work, so I think it's pretty clearly notable. Vultur (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would tend to agree. I wonder if the information couldn't be moved to a subsection of the article for whatever substance the Net would be in modern chemistry. The Formula comment makes me wonder if there's more than one copper compound that can go by this name, though. In that case, I guess "the Net" might refer more to the pattern than the substance (from the stance of modern chemistry) and maybe it should keep its own article. Lusanaherandraton (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Re notability
Talk:Thomas G. Jones

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Thomas Goode Jones was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Hello, there is an article here, http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1463, that might be useful. 
Thanks, 
Justin --Duboiju (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link
Talk:Thalerhof internment camp

message: I admit that Talerhof has never been part of Poland, however defined, but its prisoners came from an area that later became part of Poland, and it was an influence on post WW I Polish history.  Feel free to add any discussion.Pustelnik 21:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is not clear to me what his role is is Talerhof.  Did he actively fight for its closure, or did he just ignore it, and it was closed during his short reign?  Unless he put in an effort to close it, I don't see how he deserves the title "Blessed". Pustelnik (talk) 12:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles I

message: I am confused in situation, when modern Russians trying to show Thalerhof as a part of "Russian" (not Ruthenian, Ukrainian or Rusyns/Lemkos) history. Not only Russian, but also Orthodox, in time, when a lot (maybe even biggest part) of victims were Greek-Catholics. Now this history more and more stopping to have connections with Lemkos tragedy, but helps Russians in theirs against-West propaganda, and in theirs thesis about "permanent presence" of Russians (not Ruthenians!) in Galicia. I am full of sorrow... Gerea-en (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the article is misleading, as it states uncertain data as a fact. The Ukrainian page states the facts that Talerhof had 85% of Ukrainians, which contradicts the statement that "Captives who identified themselves as Ukrainians were freed from the camp." --Internetyev (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmmm

message: Let's name the article after the correct name of the place: Thalerhof – not Talerhof. And make appropriate corrections in the text.
46.211.97.110 (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to WP:COMMONNAME, both versions are supported (fairly much on par). If anything, the inclination has risen towards Talerhof again more recently (per Google ngram) in relation its function as an interment camp. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name
Talk:Jorma Valtonen

message: Was there any with him. He must be on pins and needles, and in a bad mental state after such an accident. He may be wanting to stay away from media. 
Best wishes to him and his future team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.3.250 (talk) 02:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interviews?
Talk:Gauntlet (newspaper)

message: I suggest the removal of the current masthead section. It seems too prone to change and not notable to a broader audience. iames 21:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Masthead section 

message: Staff change annually and are not notable outside of campus. This is just a vanity listing, and it covers over half of the page. --96.52.132.224 (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Staff listings

message: Reviewed the blog, and spoke with members of The Gauntlet. It is a legitamate student news source. However, part of the original document was edited.KFC.FED (talk) 23:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gontlit
Talk:Cold Sweat

message: As a member in good standing of the R&B and Soul Music WikiProject I have upgraded the class to a B, as it meets the criteria, in my view. As for the importance being 'high', the article makes the case quite well for the song and single having massive impact on the field of R&B. Jusdafax   04:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class and importance upgrades
Talk:Feelings (Morris Albert song)

message: I removed the See Also: Worst songs, etc, becuase it seemed like vandalism. No mention anywhere else on the page of it being anything but successful. Kalak5 23:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In a skit one player is begins singing the song to the dismay of the coach (presumably due to a schmaltzy inappropriate selection). The coach sends another player in, presumably to stop the song mid performance. The replacement player instead is a substitute and continues with the chorus after tapping the "starting" performer. Looking for a youtube of this now for "in other media"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.176.4 (talk) 03:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNL NFL players parody 

message: ===Last Feelings===
I'm fairly sure the song was on the soundtrack, for the English dubbed version at least, of Last Feelings.
Seems I'm not the only one to recall this https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061204103846AAr1VHK
Alls0rts (talk) 09:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Film References

message: I'm fairly sure the song was on the soundtrack, for the English dubbed version at least, of Last Feelings.
Seems I'm not the only one to recall this https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061204103846AAr1VHK
Alls0rts (talk) 09:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Feelings
Talk:The Grunt

message: Can we please adjust the bit that essentially suggests the song features stolen material?  It either needs to again have "citation needed" (as it did shortly after MOng added it), have a source, etc.  Unless we can back up the assertion that the song wasn't independently developed, we should revise wording.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.48.10 (talk) 16:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

message: Unidentified maracas!? The maracas is the single most important sound in giving this record its incredible, groovy, hypnotic power. The performer's identity ought to be found, ASAP! Yeanold Viskersenn (talk) 04:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maracas
Talk:Martin van Maële

message: I might be alone here, but I think the article could use some mention of Maele's blatant paedophilia. Because I just read "erotica," went to the commons to check it out, and found little children having sex. I understand that this can't be deleted (I wanted to, but it's already been denied) but most people, myself included, don't want to see that and little warning would be nice. 50.125.163.124 (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow I was curious about his artwork, and then I see there's straight up cp made by that guy. What a sick vile person 66.38.5.92 (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A heads up, please? 

message: :
According to the body, his father's surname was Martin and his mother's was van Maële, so where did van Miële come from? —Tamfang (talk) 04:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  a maze of surnames
Talk:Mother Popcorn

message: I just bought this song off iTunes, who credits it to "James Brown & Astrud Gilberto".  What?!?!  That's an odd combination if I've ever heard one.  What does Gilberto have to do with this song, or any James Brown song for that matter? 159.26.240.128 (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like some sort of typo or error, presumably made in some electronic database and then mirrored on innumerable sites. All Music Guide as well as every printed discography I've seen say she had nothing whatsoever to do with this song, and her music is completely different anyways. InnocuousPseudonym (talk) 20:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Say When!!

message: Hey folks, not sure if there is any coverage where we could cite this in the article. The episode aired on Buzzr as part of the Lost and Found marathon was the run-through described in the article featuring two $750 matches culminating in a championship match worth $2,000. The sentence describing this run-through itself has a citation needed tag, and all I've got is WP:OR, can't find anything, so maybe someday. The episode is on the Buzzr Youtube channel for only a limited amount of time. talkingbirds 23:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Buzzr Lost and Found
Talk:WNNH

message: The station is back to airing music 24/7 (last night had a "Blue Suede Shoes" marathon constantly playing, now it seems to be regular programming).  If NH1 has given up on it, then this must be a permanent change.  Nothing online yet about this, though (at least from what I've seen).
GVO8891 (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back to Music
Talk:Feast of the Baptism of the Lord

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with "Baptism of Jesus" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.130.7 (talk) 17:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: old

message: I will be revising this:
"In fact, the Tridentine Calendar has no feast of the Baptism of the Lord. It was almost four centuries later that the feast was instituted, ...."
"almost four centuries later" is out of context, and I will change the wording.
Carlm0404 (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the context
Talk:Pipe fitting

message: this page should be merged with pipefitter, pipefitting and pipefitter is the same topic, one is the action of fitting the pipe the other is the person doing the fitting. Since this is located within the trade workers category it is my impression the latter is the intent Granite07 17:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: We're told in the lead of the article that pipe fitting is an occupation; however, instead of describing the occupation, the remainder of the article (save for the Occupational hazards section) describes types of pipe and tubing materials. The topic of pipe/tubing materials is, or should be, covered other articles: see Water pipe, Plastic pressure pipe systems, etc. To resolve this, I think the material-related content can be transferred to these existing or new articles as appropriate. SixSix (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article content does not correlate with article topic 

message: This article should be merged with the article on Pipefitter. One is the trade and the other is the work done by that trade.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crozz131 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be merged 

message: PEX piping is becoming more and more popular. It probably should be mentioned.70.79.55.114 (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: PEX Pipe Material

message: Like Shark Bite - maybe I'm missing where they are mentioned on Wikipedia - but could have a passing mention in "Copper Pipe" section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.190.112.56 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Push Fittings
Talk:Get Up (I Feel Like Being a) Sex Machine

message: Since this is on Songs written by James Brown I assume it is. It really should state that preferably with a source. It currently only states it was recorded by him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB04:76C:9100:2C59:43AC:740B:F6B0 (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written by? 

message: what movie was the video from? CFLeon (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Video

message: You can see on the picture that the title on the disc was "GET UP I Feel Like Being Like A SEX MACHINE".
It's different than the title given in this article (notice there is "Like" after "Being"). So which one is wrong?
Ceredir (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Get Up (I Feel Like Being a) Sex Machine" is the wording used in the official singles discography included in Star Time, as well as references such as Allmusic, etc., so it is the one to go with. I am noting the variant wording in the caption under the picture of the single. InnocuousPseudonym (talk) 04:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: the song is used during the dancing sequences in GTA San Andreas, should be mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.225.143 (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GTA
Talk:Thanh Hóa

message: What is the chu nom for Thanh Hoa? Is it 清化 or 淸化? If so, this information should be added. LordAmeth (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanh Hóa

message: Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cần Thơ which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The city is given as Thanh Hoa by Britannica and  VOV Online. Kauffner (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoring deleted RM bot note

message: According to history this page has again been moved counter RM result: In ictu oculi (talk) 05:54, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Per suggestion I've moved the article back to its previous location per the most recent recent requested move here. As there has already been a move discussion, the article should not be moved without another one.--Cúchullain t/c 14:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd undiscussed move counter RM result
Talk:List of municipalities in British Columbia

message: Article says BC is the 2nd largest in land area in the intro and links to List of Canadian provinces and territories by area. This link contradicts the claim and states that BC is the 4th largest.
:As Nunavut and the Northwest Territories are territories and not provinces, BC is second to only Quebec among the 10 provinces. Hwy43 (talk) 06:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is BC actually the 2nd largest province? 

message: I am shutting down for the night, but I recall from a past FL nomination for another province/territory that all instances within must be wikilinked. Wikilinking to city, town, and village would undeniably be WP:EASTER as they are commonly understood terms, so that is why they were wikilinked to the list articles associated with the status within the province/territory. No action on this at moment as I will return to check if my memory is correct or out to lunch and report back. In the meantime, the two population columns and the change columns have been right-justified. The two columns that follow are center-justified and all equivalent columns across remaining provinces and territories in Canada are also center-justified IIRC. It would be appreciated if they can be returned to center justification in the meantime for consistency. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 06:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:EASTER]] in Status column
Talk:Temple of Literature, Hanoi

message: Someone from IP addresses 118.71.37.85 and 118.71.34.88 (possibly the same person) has changed "Temple of Literature" to "Temple of 
Confucian Learning". Could the person making the changes back up this English translation of the name? It is not found anywhere on the Internet, unlike "Temple of Literature". Moreover, it is not a literal translation of the name "Van Mieu". Unless the name "Temple of Confucian Learning" has actually been adopted by Van Mieu itself, there do not seem to be any grounds for changing the English-language name. If "Temple of Confucian Learning" has been officially adopted, "Temple of Literature" should be shown as an alternative, literal, or former name and should not be deleted. This is especially the case as Van Mieu (文廟) is translated as "Temple of Literature" or "Temple of Culture" in many other contexts.
Bathrobe (talk) 04:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Temple of Literature" is a very odd translation, but it seems to be in general usage. The meaning of "Van" is more close to "Civil" as opposed to "Military".118.71.49.118 (talk) 10:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Temple of Confucian Learning?

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Khuê Văn Các.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: Move to Văn Miếu or Van Mieu, redirect the ill-translated name "Temple of Literature" to Temple of Confucius.134.76.63.237 (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody went ahead and did that. But let's see some sources. Reverted. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Van Mieu does not mean Temple of Literature. This is a false cognate. Please revert move. Sgnpkd (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal

message: Temple of Literature is a mistranslation. 文廟 Văn miếu is short for 文宣王廟 Văn tuyên vương miếu (Temple of Prince Wénxuān). Prince Wénxuān is the posthumous name of Confucius, given to him by Emperor Xuanzong of Tang. And if you visit the temple, you'll see it actually does not worship any literature, but Confucius, Duke of Zhou and other important figures in Confucianism. --KomradeRice (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple of Literature is a common name for this temple in English, but incorrect.
Talk:Chocolate City (song)

message: One of Washington DC's nicknames is the Chocolate City, was wondering why this would not be in the description of the song, esp since the song refers to a hypothesized president and cabinet. - 209.248.175.82 21:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington DC? 

message: It says Revrend Ike was secretary of Treausury, but the lyrics clearly say "Secretary of the Treasure". This should be changed. Atari2 (talk) 19:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secretary of the Treasury