Talk:Clitoris/Archive 2

message: Cantus, will you please answer the questions about the source of your :Image:Vagina Clitoris.jpg and the legal status thereof?
I have already asked you about it here and I have asked on your talk page where you have already posted your comments directly above as well as directly below my questions, so I assume that you must have read them.
This is important because if it turns out that we cannot legally use the image you have uploaded it would make the reverting war resulting in article protection as well as the entire discussion with the Image Poll below a completely pointless waste of time.
Please answer. Thank you. Rafał Pocztarski 06:29, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Image:Vagina Clitoris.jpg has been added to Wikipedia:Copyright problems#September 5. Rafał Pocztarski 04:22, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions for Cantus

message: Most of the pronunciation stuff is square boxes - is there a reason for this? It looks odd. 195.158.9.78 10:40, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That is odd. I've commented it out for now. I tried to revert to the existing, older version, but no joy. See wikipedia:bug reports, I guess. Martin 21:37, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

text: I re-uploaded the image, which seems to have fixed it for now. Martin 11:46, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation (again)

message: The link in the "See also" section:
http://en.wikipedia.org/upload/1/19/Clitoris.jpg
brings up a page that says,
Not Found
The requested URL was not found on this server.
Please try our main page.
and then redirects to the main page.
: Yes, it seems to be broken. I'm going to try again one more time...  well it's lasted a bit longer. Martin 22:58, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Clitoris on the main page?

message: # inadequate pornographic image lifted from the web —Cantus
#:Unsupported statement - give source to back your assertion that it's "lifted from the web" - David Gerard 19:43, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cons

message: This is the original photo which the above photo was made from.
====Pros====
# ...
====Cons====
# Too much detail compared to the version above. Marnanel 19:37, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Original photo

message: # Too much detail compared to the version above. Marnanel 19:37, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cons

message: #Cantus 07:47, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
====Pros====
# adept and respectful encyclopedic diagram —Cantus
# doesn't show clitoris, but shows clitoris —Rrjanbiah
# I agree with Cantus here--198 00:23, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: This drawing

message: # adept and respectful encyclopedic diagram —Cantus
# doesn't show clitoris, but shows clitoris —Rrjanbiah
# I agree with Cantus here--198 00:23, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Pros

message: # childish cartoon —Rrjanbiah
# greatly inferior to an actual photo, being substituted out of squeamishness - David Gerard 19:50, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cons

message: Unknown, uploaded on August 30 by Cantus.
Have you drawn it yourself? Please add a copyright notice and a license please. Also, if you still have the original, please upload it as PNG instead of JPEG. Please see: Wikipedia:Uploading images. Rafał Pocztarski 15:48, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal status

message: ====How should it look like====
Encyclopaedic
====How it should not look like====
Bomis-like :O)  - unless we build a Bomipedia. Happy serene editing :O) - irismeister 15:34, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
::Iris miester - what is the copyright status of the drawing above? Theresa Knott  (The torn steak) 18:25, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Other photo

message: Bomis-like :O)  - unless we build a Bomipedia. Happy serene editing :O) - irismeister 15:34, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
::Iris miester - what is the copyright status of the drawing above? Theresa Knott  (The torn steak) 18:25, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: How it should not look like