lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Great Cold Distance

message: * http://www.blistering.com/fastpage/fpengine.php/templateid/17680/menuid/3/tempidx/5/link/1 Sergecross73 msg me 16:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The band keeps referring to songs that didn't make the proper album. Keeping a list here, as it'd be great for a Background/Writing/Recording type section.
#Dissolving Bonds http://www.blistering.com/fastpage/fpengine.php/templateid/17680/menuid/3/tempidx/5/catid/4/restemp/N%3B/fPpagesel/2
#Displaced http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/katatonia-to-release-new-single-in-march/
#Unfurl http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/katatonia-to-release-new-single-in-march/
#Code Against the Codehttp://www.blabbermouth.net/news/katatonia-new-single-to-feature-exclusive-bonus-material/
Feel free to add to, with a source if possible. Sergecross73 msg me 16:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-sides 

message: Right now, the article is July (EP), but it's actually a single from the album. Will someone move the page in July (Katatonia song)? --78.12.240.121 (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 

message: I don't think the source used can be considered reliable. It's too easy to use an archive (which even doesn't say that litteraly, it just says that, in the album, they're still the same "hard-rocking-but-metal-to-the-core" band from their beginnings, but it's nothing concrete) from 15 years. Katatonia have never been a "hard rock" (straightforward I mean) act.
:Wikipedia writes according to what reliable sources say. This is doubly so with subjective things like genre. We go by what sources say, not our personal theories (which violate WP:OR/WP:SYNTH.) Feel free to remove unsourced genre, but any additions of unsourced genre, or your removal of genre from reliable sources, are going to be continued to be undone. (See WP:RSMUSIC and WP:NOTRSMUSIC for a list of commonly acceptable or unacceptable sources. Sergecross73 msg me 16:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hard rock" and "shoegaze metal"? Come on!
Talk:Peasants, Pigs & Astronauts

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Chain e-mail

message: __TOC__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move for consistency reasons. Feel free to open a WP:RM at Talk:E-mail, though. —Nightstallion (?) 12:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I have removed the versions of the article that contained the copyright stuff. Note that this article also has some revisions of the previous article that was in this location before the move. For the record, in case this operation has to be performed again, here is the list of removed revisions:
 # 13:34, 24 February 2006 . . Pearle (Changing  to )
 # 04:14, 24 February 2006 . . 82.46.76.125
 # 04:13, 24 February 2006 . . 82.46.76.125
 # 19:28, 22 February 2006 . . Barefootguru (Email  E-Mail per page name (and dictionary))
 # 12:17, 20 February 2006 . . Nightstallion (moved Chain email to Chain e-mail: WP:RM)
 # 08:37, 15 February 2006 . . 218.188.225.186 (Research of Internet rumour yet to be conducted)
 # 08:35, 15 February 2006 . . 218.188.225.186
 # 14:02, 17 May 2005 . . Timwi (fix double-redirect)
 # 00:57, 9 February 2005 . . Carrp (redirect to Electronic mail)
 # 00:56, 9 February 2005 . . Carrp (redirect to e-mail not Chainmail)
 # 00:55, 9 February 2005 . . Neutrality (#REDIRECT Chain letter)
 # 00:55, 9 February 2005 . . Nadavspi (redirect Chainmail)
 # 00:54, 9 February 2005 . . Nadavspi ()
 # 00:54, 9 February 2005 . . 68.71.218.118
- Liberatore(T) 19:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove of copyrighted material

message: Proposing a merger into chain letter because, as the first line of the article states, a chain e-mail is really just the Internet incarnation of a chain letter.
*As the one proposing this merger, obviously I support it.  --Stratadrake 12:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:High Anxiety (Therapy? album)

message: If the title was influenced by the Mell Brooks film of the same name, you may want to add that. --68.81.70.65 (talk) 12:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Anxiety 
Talk:List of breweries in Colorado

message: * Tivoli Brewery - Denver - Tivoli and Denver beers
* Zangs Brewery - Denver -
* Walter Brewery - Pueblo - Sheridan Beer
*
: I'm sure there are more. Need some refs so we can add a formal section in the main article. LanceBarber (talk) 06:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct breweries 

message: For most lists like this, the inclusion criteria for entries is having their own Wikipedia article. See WP:WTAF
Minimally, each entry has to be verifiable. To avoid WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and WP:NPOV problems, each entry without it's own article should be verified by independent, reliable sources. --Ronz (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think you're right about each brewery having its own Wikipedia article; however - there are some HUGE gaps here and not all have done the work to become uniquely notable aside from the fact that they exist. So, you either end up with a incomplete list of 6 breweries which have articles or we spend a bit trying to get as many of them articles as possible. As an aside, the Poudre River Public Library is hosting a Wikipedia Day in November to tackle exactly this kind of thing. I'll bring up the idea of tackling the brewery articles one by one. - NickInFoCo (talk) 02:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! --Ronz (talk) 15:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria?
Talk:Rabbeinu Tam

message: There isn't an RM yet. And if there is POV shouldn't be an issue, instead WP:COMMONNAME should be the issue. If the personal accusation made by IZAK against the poster back in Oct 2009 is correct, or not, then IZAK needs to say that to the 2009 user on the 2009 user's home page. Note also that the incorrect information that The New Jewish Encyclopedia has the colloquial name isn't correct:
 
In ictu oculi (talk) 11:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, I don't think you've read the comment about the NJE very carefully, but the quote you provide makes the COMMONNAME point beautifully. --Dweller (talk) 11:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Dweller. No, I misread it in the jumble. How did you arrive at the Google Books result that shows more results for Rabbeinu Tam than Jacob ben Meir? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[New Jewish Encyclopedia]], 1976

message: Newer scientific works have clarified, that the Sefer HaYashar "of" Rabbeinu Tam and the Sefer HaYashar of Zerahiah the Greek is one work and the author is Zerahiah the Greek.Jewish Ethics and Jewish Mysticism in Sefer Ha-Yashar, Shimon Shokek, Edwin Mellen Press, 1991 I would say the information how stated on the chapter about his works dealing with the authorship of the Sefer HaYashar is incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Informationskampagne (talk • contribs) 19:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "Dubious" template, because it seemed to relate to something else completely. You can add a paragraph or subsection about the issue, if you want to. Debresser (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works - Authorship of the Sefer HaYashar
Talk:Amy Sherman-Palladino

message: Isn't it a bit obvious (Amy Sherman-Pallidino wearing a top hat)? Emily 21:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Caption for the Picture

message: At 03:42, on 19 May 2006, 67.80.164.248 found it necessary to add the one word 'Jewish' to the entry.  Why is that relevant?
because people like to split people up? I don't find it at all important, but hey leave it, why change it?--Jessnotdean 13:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this addition? 

message: The Plot line for her new show was restated and I was wondering if anyone else felt it to be redundent?--Jessnotdean 13:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. That's why I deleted it. NickBurns 02:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: * :File:BlondevenusFR.jpeg
*:File:Alex Borstein by Gage Skidmore 4.jpg
64.175.40.37 (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Blonde Venus" + "Alex Borstein" 

message: Where did she go to school? 71.127.198.142 (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:Mission: Impossible (1990 video game)

message: Huh? This is a review, not an article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.231.180.181 (talk • contribs) .
:Seems so. I played this game, and is considered one of the hardest games ever made, not without reason. Not even that fact is mentioned. -- ReyBrujo 00:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: Mission: Impossible was not developed by Nintendo nor by its 1st or 2nd party developers. MuZemike (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Part of WikiProject Nintendo
Talk:The Graveyard (album)

message: This is the most underrated King Diamond Albums ever, I do not understand Why the critic has talked so bad from this album. hear it by yourself and judge.--Judas 23:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Eye (King Diamond album)

message: I'd like to add there is significant controversy over whether the drums are a machine, or if Shaw played them.  Band leaders in the past have been less-than-truthful about using a drum machine due to the stigma in the metal genre over using one.  There are comments searchable on the internet who claim Shaw actually programmed the drums and sent them to King Diamond.  Others say Shaw played on some tracks and not others.  Ultimately, it's guesswork at this point.  But the statement in this article is a definitive one, and that's simply not true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soul schizm (talk • contribs) 22:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drum Controversy 

message: His past three concept albums have been told from the perspective of the protagonists with this one being told from the view of a narrator.
Isn't Abigail also told from the viewpoint of a narrator, while Them and Conspiracy are from the viewpoint of King? --203.27.154.42 12:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrator/protagonist 

message: The inquisitor on which the Eye is based is Nicholas Rémy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_R%C3%A9my
This wiki has an error. 2A02:1388:209D:6D10:0:0:2C26:A23A (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake
Talk:34.788%...Complete

message: I don't think that woman is talking in Japanese (well, reversed Japanese). It seems that it's some kind of African language. 89.236.213.250 (talk) 10:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Japanese.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.240.66 (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Whore, The Cook and The Mother
Talk:House of God (album)

message: It is only suggested in the album that the mummified body found in the sarcophagus is Jesus. I put christ in quotations to emphasize this in the article.--Hndsmepete 05:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fatal Portrait

message: What does the title "The Jonah" mean? The lyrics have nothing to do with the prophet called Jonah. Neither is this name mentioned in King Diamond's lyrics to the song. In "The Candle" he sings "The Word "Jonah" Is Her Mark, She's Branded...". Still I don't understanding its meaning. Any help?--80.133.208.199 (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Jonah"
Talk:The Angel and the Dark River

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.waterytimes.com/PDF/waterytimes_4_rev.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: *   "a doom epic"      . Musicaindustrial (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Talk:Mindfields

message: The AllMusic review of this album, included on the Wikipedia page, vastly underrates the recording. Kimball’s lead vocals soar, Luke’s riff are an reflect  his influence and friendship w EVH, and overall this is a remarkable release. 6 stars! 40.135.47.66 (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that your opinion? Or do you have a notable reviewer writing this?PrisonerB (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The return of Bobby Kimball
Talk:History of the Dallas Mavericks

message: This article really should be merged with Dallas Mavericks. If someone could spend the time doing this, that would be great. --Schadenfreude52 19:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lipoxygenase

message: Oh drat, I just realized that there's another page called Lipoxygenases.  There shouldn't have been (against naming conventions) but I should have checked before I started this one.  Guess I've got to do a merge.  eh?   What kind of a warning do I put up in the meantime?  I'll fake it.  David.Throop 21:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, I've got the merge notices in right, now.  David.Throop 21:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Lipoxygenase

message: Th paragraph on active site contains the phrase "This region contains two of the three zinc-ligands". Those zinc ligands are not mentioned elsewhere in the article. What is their function?T.vanschaik (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zinc presence 

message: Term nNot used in article. 81.159.93.150 (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "lipoxidase" redirect here? 

message: 62.235.175.116 (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ipa?
Talk:List of rulers of Saxony

message: The page says that from 1539-1541, Henry IV, Duke of Saxony was duke of Saxony. However, looking at the German pages, that seems to be :de:Heinrich V. (Sachsen) as the ruler between George, Duke of Saxony and Maurice, Elector of Saxony. Which one is correct? Kusma (討論) 21:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of rulers of Saxony

message: I can not see any reason, why the Coat of arms of Munster, Lower Saxony are show in the article - nor do I understand what kind of connection there could be between Munster and a List of rulers of Saxony. This must be a mistake...--Zarbi1 (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms of Munster (?) 

message: this is messy and hard to read. Further more complicated that the area called Saxony kept on changing. This article has a bias towards anything called just "Saxony" This give the idea that Old Saxony and the Free State of Saxony is the same entity. Really this is more about the title "Duke of Saxony"  Tinynanorobots (talk) 23:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  organization 

message: I removed the pretender section since there is no need for such a section and it doesn't seem like it is a rule that all list of rulers/monarchs should have one. And the whole dynastic dispute would just be too messy to deal with later on.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 23:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it should be moved somewhere else, because it should be somewhere. Tinynanorobots (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretender section 

message: This article shouldn’t place the kingdom as the ultimate head of the dynasty because it co-existed with the grand duchy and duchies, which were all genealogically senior to the royal line. The head of the house of Wettin is the titular grand duke of Saxony, not either of the royal pretenders, one of which is not a Wettin at all. 2607:FEA8:C260:D0:7444:7A34:ED0A:5C8D (talk) 14:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head of the House of Wettin, etc
Talk:60s

message: I right 2600:1004:B0CC:5F8A:7583:7CAB:6537:2239 (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What zero is aw on the phone 

message: The year 69 AD saw the music festival Woodstockius take place, in what is now northern Italy. Bands featured included Jeffersonius Chariot, James Hendricus, and The Whomst. The event was advertised as "tribus diebus pacis et musicae." It is estimated that as many as 5 million people attended the festival. MightyArms (talk) 22:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodstockius
Category talk:Jews and Judaism in the Roman Empire

message: It is well known to the Christian church history that Hadrian changed the name of Israel and Jerusalem to Palestine because the jews were monothiostic and did not want to submit to Roman gods. I do not know the compelet history but only a little as I menssioned above. Why this information is not menssioned in your articles?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.167.65 (talk • contribs)  
*See:
#Hadrian#Second Roman-Jewish War
#Bar Kokhba revolt#Outcome of the war
#Syria Palaestina#History
#Palestine#Roman rule (63 BC)
#Timeline of the name Palestine#Roman Aelia Capitolina period
Hope this helps. IZAK (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Professor Ivo

message: Is it is possible he was named after Dr Ivo Robotnik from the sonic games, they both created cyborgs and robots  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.147.126.235 (talk) 22:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name inspiration?
Talk:Simmons Bank Liberty Stadium

message: I'm game.  Why does it need cleanup?  One can aruge that there is something of a pro-Memphis bias, I suppose, but why not do some editing to fix it if this is what you think, rather than just tagging it, which anyone can do and does little to improve anything.
Rlquall 21:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The entire "Legacy" section is opinion, and much of the "Future" section that precedes it is speculation. Violates NPOV. --Zpb52 (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Has anybody ever said in a reputable article that the Liberty Bowl is a very late example of Streamline Moderne architecture?  To me, its very appearance indicates this to be the case, but obviously that is mere opinion on my part, even though the design motifs make it a very accurate opinion, at least to my conceits.  If anyone has something like this and could link to it, then it would make a very nice contribution to the quality of the article, but of course, in the absence of reliable sourcing, it would not be.  2600:1004:B14B:B650:795B:88B5:6C9F:7418 (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Streamline Moderne? 
Talk:Operation Northwind (1944)

message: Call me Mr. Overbearing, but I think the article needs improvement. I may well translate the German Aticle into English, subsituting this one.Antisyntagmatarchos (talk) 20:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Superficial article

message: At the moment number of US casualties is claimed to be 29,000. Source "Riviera to the Rhine" says 14,000 in page 527, which is cited here. In footnote there are several figures, like "Seventh Army hospitals processing about 9,000 wounded and 17,000 "sick and injured"" but also speculations about many of them returning to their units after treatment, which doesn't really make them casualties. Also, there is only one number given concerning killed US soldiers, and it's 773, not 3,000 as claimed here. The same problem is in German article too. Where does this 3000 come from? Riviera to the Rhine, chapter 28 Ukas (talk) 00:26, 7 February  (edit: fixed link)
:Casualty figures were revised to reflect the above cited reference "Riviera to the Rhine" published by the U.S. Army Center of Military History. NotaBene 鹰百利  Talk 18:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict between text & reference

message: Is this simply the German name for the Battle of the Bulge? It seems to be. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the BoB? 

message: Maybe the article should be renamed to Operation Northwind (1944) like the one for the 1941 operation. Any opinions? Ентусиастъ (talk) 11:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper name
Talk:Second Republic (South Africa)

message: I have redirected this article to History of South Africa in the apartheid era because:
* the terminology "first/second/third republic" is not in general use regarding South Africa, suggesting these are "original research" pages, or pushing a personal agenda
* there is no information that is not also in the main article
The original author has been banned from Wikipedia.
Zaian 21:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Template talk:User Nepal Maoists

message: Its highly unlikely that the Maoists themsleves would use the monarchic flag though. --Soman 21:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I'll do that. --Horses In The Sky 13:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, that image wouldn't look very good, I'll find a better one. --Horses In The Sky 13:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Done, I wonder why this template hasn't been deleted yet? --Horses In The Sky 13:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The new image is not of CPN(M) but of SJM. --Soman 14:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cultural heritage

message: Loss of Loboc's cultural heritage site impact and support system,bibliographic entry 112.198.66.97 (talk) 03:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ENGLISH 

message: What  are the besic features of heritage 2409:4060:2E92:6AB8:0:0:B44B:6B02 (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: hindi 2402:8100:2045:512D:0:0:11F0:879F (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi uttrakhand 12th bord 

message: hindi 2402:8100:2045:512D:0:0:11F0:879F (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi uttrakhand 12th bord 

message: hindi12th uttrakhand
Madal pepar 2402:8100:2045:512D:0:0:11F0:879F (talk) 16:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi uttrakhand 12th bord
Talk:Trashman (video game)

message: The 2nd link I have just added is probably worth a trivia section or an equivalent. If and when we summarize it properly, we need to upgrade it to a  and move it over to the References section. --BACbKA 22:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to have fun 

message: I played it on a Amstrad CPC... does anybody know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.230.114.64 (talk) 07:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another 8 bit versions 

message: Transhman, a Pac-Man clone, was the title of a video for VIC-20 . --Herbol (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trashman (VIC20)
Talk:Sibling Rivalry (Family Guy)

message: Is the serial killer scene a reference to Hit Man?  Does anyone know if the DVD commentary is exhaustive in it's listing of cultural references? Melink14 (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural References? 

message: Is the Gavin Dunne credited here the same Gavin Dunne that is the mind behind the Escapists' Miracle of Sound? Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 01:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gavin Dunne 