lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Nose (Gogol short story)

message: 1.	I believe that the sources currently being used for the article are reliable. These sources either come from reputable news sites, such as the BBC, or peer-reviewed academic journals. One issue with the sources is that there are only five of them. Considering how long The Nose has been in print, there should be more literature available to be used as sources. 
2.	The topic is not sufficiently covered. The introduction needs to have additional information about the background of the work. There should be a section about the creation of the work as well covering things like the inspiration and writing process behind the story. The plot summary should be expanded with more details. There should be a section on the characters, and a short analysis of each. The structure of the story needs to have a section as well. There needs to be an entire section on the symbolism found in the story and a brief analysis of what each of the symbols means. Another section that should be added is themes. Major theme sin the story should be added here. The “Critical Assessment” portion of the article needs to be expanded to discuss the reception of the work. There also needs to be a section listing adaptations of this story into other mediums such as film. 
3.	3. I believe that the topic is covered objectively because most of the information on the page is a summary on the plot of the story. The analysis portions of the article are very fair and balanced as well. 
4.	I believe that the article is well organized in structure, but needs a lot of additional information to fill in missing gaps in information. There also needs to be additional analysis done. 
5.	The grammar and style of the article are in line with other articles found on Wikipedia. 
6.	There are not any accompany images, and several should be added to demonstrate the different interpretations of the story.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathan.lin.18 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "His behavior reflects the influence of vision-oriented Western culture that emphasizes deodorization and hygiene"
Deodorization doesn't really pair well with being influenced by a vision-oriented culture, like it's basically saying the opposite..?
2600:6C54:7900:D4D:E9AC:2A0:2DA4:3096 (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sentence doesnt make sense
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Beachwear

message: People are objecting to this page because "it's an essay"(paraphrasing); I don't understand this objection totally.  I guess it's explained at Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#What_Wikipedia_entries_are_not #9, i.e. Wikipedia:No_original_research.  But the facts in a personal essay should be saved from the opinions, assuming the topic is encyclopedic.  Simply because an article currently contains only a personal essay is not a reason to delete or keep it.  Is there somewhere else I should put these concerns? JesseW 02:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Essays

message: Um, it seemed on first glance to be.  It's something someone can have a career designing, modeling, manufacturing or marketing, so should it not have an article?  Why would an article on operawear be obviously wrong?  Please tell me if I'm missing something. JesseW 02:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Beachwear encyclopedic?

message: I think a better analogy would be that having an article on beachwear is as valid as having an article on formalwear, black tie, or on business attire, or mess dress.  I think beachwear, businesswear, etc., are broader and of more general interest than specific activity wear like operawear.  Beachwear spans a broad range of activities from swimming, to sunbathing, to playing various sports like beach volleyball, to use in urban beach settings, and other situations that are beachlike.  Operawear seems much more narrow in scope. Glogger 02:46, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Beachwear versus operawear
Talk:Harkness Tower

message: Does anyone know how to fix the image so that it shows up inside its frame? -SaxTeacher 19:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:David Green

message: David Green was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP AS CHANGED.  5 votes to keep, 2 votes to delete (all prior to edit by User:Anthony DiPierro).  Postdlf 02:24, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Common name hard to google, but the first book title gets zero hits, and the second, when combined with his name, finds nothing relevant. Likely prank related to The Many Camels of Je-Hash Kabib (see prior nomination). Niteowlneils 03:00, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[David Green]]
Talk:USS Vincennes (1826)

message: lots of good detail on Vincennes here: http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/v3/vincennes-i.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfman (talk • contribs) 03:24, 19 October 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed - DANFS text is PD, so we usually just suck the whole thing in verbatim, makes a good base for further improvement. Stan 05:11, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail

message: USS Vincennes (1826-1867) and this article are about the same vessel.  I suggest that the material on that article be incorporated into this one since this article is using the guidelines for ship's naming conventions Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships). I'll consider doing it myself, if I get time to. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 06:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge It's the same ship.  Darkspots 14:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, merge. --Dumarest 11:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge No reason not to.Cromdog 00:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: Replaced old blue infobox with newer type light blue infobox and added additional data into the new infobox. Made minor edits throughout, including headers, links, spelling, etc., and added See Also, cats, and more references. Compared data with DANFS and other sources, added refs, and removed tag.Wikited (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgraded page

message: While the WWII cruisers were undoubtedly named after the town (the Tico class one was named after the battle), suspect that this Vincennes was named after the Revolutionary War battle(s). Unfortunately, the DANFS article collects all ships of the same name under the same heading so can't really differentiate much between them in terms of name origin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.168.113 (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Named for town?

message: I was going through the international cemetery list here: http://www.interment.net/data/japan/international_cemetery.htm
In that list I saw this entry: Miller, John, d. Nov 18, 1854, "Capt AFT G US Navy USS Vincennes"
The Vincennes did not travel through the Ryūkyū island chain until March the next year (1855). So, does that mean Capt John Miller died in Nov of 1854 and they held onto this body for four months before they buried him in Naha, Okinawa?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.135.6.211 (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2012

message: The infobox states 18 guns (supported by DANFS) while the ship's momument states 24 guns (supported by image of same). Wonder why the discrepancy...? - wolf 23:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of guns
Talk:Hiram Paulding

message: a photo of paulding is available in this montage http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h53000/h53377c.htm if someone has software to separate out his image, it would go nicely on this page. Wolfman 03:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. Thanks for the pointer.  Jinian 11:10, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Regional notice boards

message: Would anyone object if I change the name of the notice boards from "XXXX Wikipedians' notice board" to "XXXX topics notice board" or "XXXX-related topics notice board"?  -spencer195 03:38, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would, so I'm glad this didn't happen. I thought I'd objected long ago. Ambi 08:56, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: No, but i think the board is useful in coordination.. look at the history etc.. 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 09:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name issue

message: I set up a Malta RWNB and I've put notices on major Talk pages, user Talk pages of interested users, and on the main page of the malta-geo-stub page. This seems to be getting things going, but I wondered long term what the usual way to find these things are. Srl 01:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but i think the board is useful in coordination.. look at the history etc.. 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 09:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to promote RWNBs? 

message: The notice boards are now named almost haphazardly, with many of them implying that they are only for people from a particular country, and not for all wikipedians who are interested in and/or knowledgeable about that country. Some of the noticeboards even state this explicitly. I propose that we adopt a standardized naming scheme which should avoid such an impression, and keep the page names short. For e.g. Ireland, it could be any of:
*Wikipedia:Noticeboard Ireland
*Wikipedia:Noticeboard for Ireland
*Wikipedia:Ireland noticeboard
*Wikipedia:Noticeboard for Irish topics
Any other ideas? Zocky | picture popups 00:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A uniform naming scheme 

message: I'm curious why not all are listed here. Maurreen 17:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not all listed

message: It's a bit strange that while this page is called Wikipedia talk:Regional notice boards, only a single page is listed, and that's under a section called Non-regional noticeboards. Hum.  --MichaelMaggs 20:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're all listed in the template that displays on the right hand side of the page. --bainer (talk) 04:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of project page doesn't seem sensible 

message: Hmm, I sense extreme deadness in this discussion page (last edit was 4(!) years ago). Not sure how many are watching, but I just wanted to promote a new template I created, Template:Regional Wikipedian notice boards. It was requested at Template talk:RWNBs before. For those interested in using it, have at it. --Bxj (talk) 00:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Great job ;) I added it to WP:Dashboard. -- œ™ 13:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New template
Talk:Hierarchical INTegration

message: Is there a database somewhere of results from running this benchmark on a variety of computers?
-96.237.1.85 (talk) 13:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article now has links to references that show the results from running this benchmark on a dozen or so very different computers. If you find a database of results, please add a link to it into the article. Thank you. --DavidCary (talk) 06:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: results database?
Talk:I Bificus

message: This platform is Duh. Elisabeth you're fading. You need lyrics and mgmt 
Regards,
Nicholas William Hlady 2605:8D80:464:4960:3980:1C36:A1EA:C423 (talk) 10:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balloons; you're fired; you forgot to get your paycheck. 

message: I still think of you  I remember the kiss on the cheek on Granville St., before I got on the bus to go to the Chiropractor 2605:8D80:464:4960:3980:1C36:A1EA:C423 (talk) 10:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakup
Talk:Black (surname)

message: add/convert Gaelic, Italian, Latin, Russian, Greek, etc. lysdexia 11:40, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: like Don Black (disambiguation), Bud Black (disambiguation) --Schwab7000 (talk) 11:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  some disambiguation-links
Talk:Purge (Bif Naked album)

message: I grew up with this album, and before today had never noticed the 13th track "Religion" but upon repurchasing the cd and playing, it appeared and there it was on the back. Before today I had never heard this song and it's not a track on Spotify. Was there a release of the cd that excluded this track? Or am I simply going mad? 173.240.9.14 (talk) 00:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spotify Track Listings
Talk:Rigid designator

message: Perhaps what he meant was that terms like "the holy roman empire" (with "the" at the beginning) could count as proper names, and not as descriptions (see the 1st lecture of naming and necessity)
:that works for your example because 'the holy roman empire' is a name, but not for 'the 1st Chancellor of the German Empire', which is clearly a description. Nortexoid 23:02, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another interpretation 

message: They're useful for reference fixing and initial baptisms -- e.g. "This baby boy who I am pointing at who is the son of so and so is named John". Nortexoid 02:47, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions 

message: The article seems to do a good job at presenting Kripke's positive views.  However, like anything else, his views have been criticized.  Philopshers of science have argued for example the Water is NOT necessarily H20 is all possible worlds.  Followers of Wittgenstein, I get the impression, do not accept Kripke's views.  I think both Ayer and Quine are anti-essentialists too.  Perhaps the article can provide criticism of Kripk'e views.
Some of the classical criticism should also be mentioned. Like Quine's accusation that the notion of rigidity is circular, the suggestion that our intuitions about the way names affect truth value can be accounted for as a scope phenomenon, and Gareth Evans' refusal to distinguish between rigid designation and reference.
David Miller also criticised Kripke's distinction between rigid and non-rigid designators in "What's in a Numeral", he claimed that the distinction between rigid and non-rigid designators is either circular or question begging. 155.192.180.10 (talk) 14:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present criticisms 

message: Mostly because I wanted to know more about it, I created a page of the term vivid designator. I am hoping for some help with it, or some additional information on it. Since the terms are so closely related, I thought I'd mention it here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan Singh Long (talk • contribs) 09:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vivid designator
Talk:Superliner (passenger ship)

message: I can't see this ever being much more than a dictionary definition, and it would benefit from the context of being merged into ocean liner. 82.3.242.144 (talk) 16:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While we're at it, we might as well merge it into cruise ship, given that the newer ships are bigger. 204.52.215.107 (talk) 01:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The 10,000 grt definition, although accurate, may well be archaic now.  If the article is to be merged, it likely should be merged into Ocean liner.  But the merger discussion should be centralized in one place; a section should be started there (this section would do); and the templates should all link directly to that one section, rather than to each individual page.  I have removed the merge templates as they are old; if they are readded please link them to one talk page only.  Kablammo (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Wikipedia talk:U.S. cities without articles

message: I am interested in writing articles about the towns in Oregon, many of which are former logging towns and the like that have a bit of history to them. If anyone can direct me to some guidelines about what makes for an appropriate new article, let me know. I would hate to see some of these places fade from memory, but do not wish to annoy the wiki community.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Katr67 (talk • contribs) 22:26, May 23, 2006
:See Wikipedia:Your first article and maybe follow some links there.  Note that you'll need to create a user account to make a new article.  Ensure that your additions are cited to a reputable source, and are stated neutrally. Tuf-Kat 00:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Katr67 17:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advice
Talk:Apostolic Assemblies of Christ

message: This doesn't make sense to me. Please clarify it before re-adding it. 
:"The viewpoint is in sharp contrast to the most pentecostal churches."
This is the veiw point of the spirit of the living God,because all scripture is inspired by God. {2 timothy 3:16-17}  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.217.235 (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Relativistic jet

message: :Image:Galaxies_AGN_Inner-Structure-of.jpg
Does not have permission of authors of original scientific article to be published here.
Please delete.
Mr Brak 19:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You originally uploaded this image and as creator released it (licensed it) under the GFDL.  Are you now wishing to retract this? -- Curps 04:31, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright infringement 

message: I replaced the unsolved problems in physics paragraph regarding relativistic jets with Williams' recognized applications of Penrose's black hole energy-momentum extraction mechanism. Tcisco 03:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsolved jet problem demystified 

message: The article writes about jets, that they "have long been known to be electrically neutral". What is this inferring?
*Is it suggesting that because they contain equal numbers of proton and electrons, they are electrically neutral overall?
*Or is it saying that although plasmas are quasi-neutral, jets are actually completely neutral?
*That there are no electric fields or electric currents present... even though a current flowing through a wire is electrically neutral?
*That there is no charge separation, even though equal charge separation would still imply electrical neutrality overall? --211.178.81.118 16:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Electrical neutrality

message: Relativistic jets are commonly observed in radio-loud systems.Now my question is that how do you know the origin of emission of relativistic jet is lying at the centre of the system?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.45.64 (talk) 04:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Jet 

message: The article doesn't explain the name "relativistic jet", or what "relativistic" means. I think relativistic means "moving at a significant fraction of the speed of light" and therefore a relativistic jet is a jet of material moving at relativistic speeds. Is that right? If so could someone who actually knows about these things add a sentence to that effect to the article? Captain Chaos (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: According to this, a "Lorentz factor of ~100" would be faster than the speed of light. Should this article say "Lorentz factors of ~22.366" or something else, such as "speeds of ~.99995c" (and then I'd love to see a citation for that)? 72.164.134.11 (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorentz factor 

message: A relativistic jet is just a very big, very fast polar jet. I can't see any rationale at all for them having separate articles. Someone has even put "Not to be confused with relativistic jet, a polar jet emitted at relativistic speed" at the start of the polar jet article. On the contrary, they should be potentially confusable (as long as you realise that all relativistic jets are polar but not all polar jets are relativistic). You could even make a case for merging with bipolar outflow, though that has other differences (non-ionised gas rather than plasma, non-collimated etc). Silent Key (talk) 04:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be merged with Polar Jet
Talk:BC United

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 21:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: British Columbia United →  – The party officially changed its name today. The official name registered with Elections BC is "BC United". The article should be moved to reflect this change.-- Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Well, I thought we should go with the official name but, in fairness for the previous name (British Columbia Liberal Party), we used the full "British Columbia" despite the official name (and one used on ballots) being "BC Liberal Party".  Also for the "BC NDP", we use the longer British Columbia New Democratic Party despite "BC NDP" being the official and ballot name. So maybe we should stick with "British Columbia United" or change it to the longer "British Columbia United Party". I don't have a strong opinion either way.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The political party is titled “BC United”, not “British Columbia United Party”. “BC United” is fine, or “BC United (political party)” if a need for disambiguation arises. Although, being honest, we should consider creating a separate article on BC United and leaving the article intact for the now-historical BC Liberal party.)— Autospark (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

text: I am tentatively leaning towards BC United as the page name. That's how they're registered and how they're branding themselves, so it makes sense to follow suit rather than 'unpack' their name for them. Yes, we do that for British Columbia New Democratic Party (registered as "BC NDP"), but the footnote says it's because the party and other sources regularly use the unabbreviated form of the name (and also probably for consistency with other NDP branches). But if nobody uses the long form, then I don't think we should be pioneering it. Of course, it's still early days, so who knows how their branding will evolve, which is why I'm only tentatively supporting it. It might be better to just wait. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 April 2023 

message: Further to the closed move discussion above, and 's comment there about "how their branding will evolve", it is worth noting that BC United appears to have registered BC United Party and United BC Party as other names with Elections BC. I am not eager to change the name at this time, but this might be one thing to consider if we look at this again in the future, when more reporting has occurred and the branding has developed through elections etc.-- Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 23:53, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name: BC United, BC United Party, United BC Party...
Talk:Orthonectida

message: This article is a copy of Science Fair Projects - Orthonectida. I wonder if there is permission to copy it to Wikipedia. I'm a contributor to the Portuguese version of Wikipedia, named Rui Silva.
:Science Fair Projects has copied from WP actually - see Wikipedia:Copies of Wikipedia content (medium degree of compliance). Stan 14:25, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How do we change the infobox from showing Mesozoa to Spiralia? Bondegezou (talk) 10:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox