Talk:Henri Arnaut de Zwolle

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 00:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Neither Zwolle nor Deventer or Kampen were ever part of the Burgundian Netherlands. Apart from the fact that Burgundy gained posession of Holland and Brabant only well after 1400, Zwolle had been a city in the bishopric of Utrecht. --Proofreader (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burgundian Netherlands 

message: For the phrase "... Zwolle, at that time with the other towns on the IJssel (Deventer and Kampen) the cultural centre of the Burgundian Netherlands" is no underpinning. Moreover, the assertion is incorrect.
Hans Plantinga (talk) 22:41, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Towns on the IJssel not a cultural centre in the Burgundian Netherlands. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henri Arnaut de Zwolle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070227195418/http://www2.siba.fi/klavikordiseura/kuvalinkit/arnaut-korhonen_eng.html to http://www2.siba.fi/klavikordiseura/kuvalinkit/arnaut-korhonen_eng.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is an interesting ambiguity in the current article, which I have perpetuated. The article says that Henri Arnaut's writings contain a copy, in his handwriting, of Jacob de Liège's Speculum musicae. The article then goes on to discuss "his treatise" without making it clear whether the treatise is Jacob's or Henri's. This is perplexing me, because I've just added some material from a slightly older source (1980) which writes as though Henri Arnaut wrote the whole caboodle, with no mention of Jacob. I'm guessing that my source's author thought the writing was by Henri Arnaut and someone has since found he just copied it from an earlier author? But as this is my guess, I'm not writing it. Instead I've conveniently continued to write 'his' on the grounds that what I've written thus matches my source, but also doesn't conflict with the material being originally Jacob's. I feel I've weasled rather. Does anyone know a source that makes this more clear? Regardless of who wrote it, clearly Henri deserves some credit as a major source by which the text has come to us, and it is part of the work for which he is known, so I feel it has a place in this article whether Henri was the copyist or the author. Elemimele (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who did the writing?