Talk:Lego minifigure

message: The article fails to mention any physical sizes in millimeters (especially height) and respective approximate scale factors. 2A01:C22:BC7B:6F00:4921:37C4:1D5E:E7B3 (talk) 05:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual sizes 

message: It seems as though this page ought to mention the all-LEGO spinoff short film adaptation of the Camelot musical sequence from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. It can be found on the special edition DVD along with the Python film. -- EncycloPetey 05:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, could be. The makers of the film explicitly stated their pride in that they didn't make any custom pieces for the movie, but chose between old heads and pieces that most sufficiently fit the characterts, etc. 85.226.122.227 02:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking the Grail

message: There apparently exists another minifig article. Could someone merge and redirect? 85.226.122.227 02:22, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Lego characters" now redirects to the "Minifigure" article. I have incorporated the image gallery into this article as well. Comme le Lapin 23:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minifig article

message: The picture that was there, while it only had a few classic minifigs, was better quality-wise than the one that replaced it.  So I put it back.  Is it better to show classic themes or recent ones?  I don't know.  Discuss.  --Alynna 20:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the first picture 

message: the hair peices for the technic figures can be removed with a strong long fingure nail by jamming it under the back of it, this will make it pop out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.14.33.214 (talk) 03:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technic Figure Hair Removal 

message: Will soon take/upload pictures of separate minifig pieces. andrewrox424 Bleep 11:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I wonder whether all of those figs in the image gallery really are necessary. I think the pirate (although I miss his hook hand), the astronaut and the aquanaut should stay, but that semi-custom and either Draco or redcoat should be removed. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Gallery

message: :Image:Lego Star Wars GBA - cutscene.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lego Star Wars GBA - cutscene.png

message: This line:
Pre-1974 Lego sets included much larger figures where only the heads and hair were special pieces [1], which is why the usual figures are "mini".
Is not correct: the large figures were introduced in 1974, so only one year before the proto-minifigs without moving arms. Sets containing these large figures were sold until 1982.
Source: Bricklink http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catString=85
80.79.40.9 (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The arms, hands and the block the arms connected to were also special pieces. The sections of the arms can be separated and connected together to make extra long arms. (I used them for robot/manipulator arms.) The hands had a ball which plugged into the end sections of the arms. The top and bottom of the hands fit the base and studs of other LEGO pieces. (I used the hands for control levers, lights and weapon emitters on spaceships, in addition to robot arm grippers.) The special block the arms connected to was made of four pieces. Top, bottom and two rotating shoulder joints. The top and bottom could be separated with extreme difficulty, but without damage so they'd go back together OK. Bizzybody (talk) 09:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-1974 is not correct. 

message: Lego used to have a strict criteria in its' specialised model sets: Emphasising every-day community activity and positive social roles, the Minifigures in the sets featured policemen, firemen, ambulance drivers, family figures etc. Spacemen modelled on the Apollo moon-landings were the most exotic theme available. Figures were always smiling, wore uniforms or ordinary clothes, were never threatening or aggressive, and no weapons were ever shown. Some time in the 80s (I think) all this changed, and more 'savage' themes came in, together with film tie-ins. Does anyone know the background to the companys' change of philosophy? I think it's worth mentioning in the article. Centrepull (talk) 11:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Larger appeal to boys and adult fans? I think the first specialised heads were made for the pirate sets. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 00:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this is nitpicky, but Lego Castle featured heaps of weapons already in the 80's. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 07:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lego company - change in philosophy 

message: Duplo and Technic have minifigures (with less and more degrees of freedom respectively than mainstream Lego minfigs), and they aren't mentioned - either to include or exclude, or even as an aside - in this article.  Josh Parris 05:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Duplo and Technic? 

message: I thought the first minifigure to feature custom molded parts was the ghost from "Black Monarch's Ghost", and certainly, if we're going on figures that have custom bodies, the Skeleton predates the Martians? Mister Blisterfists (talk) 14:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Life on Mars?

message: I object to the image of the "cannibal minifigure" at the top of the page: It's not an official minifig for starters, and what's more, it can't be assembled without modifying parts, as the minifig head cannot have a spear stuck through it as is shown. I'd suggest a real fig go there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.30.14.50 (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Head image

message: Hi sorry, i'm not a member of wikipedia but i run customminifig.co.uk, i can appreciate the non-commercial nature and link building implications for wikipedia, but i felt that customminifig.co.uk,being the largest site and having run for 3 years would be a good candidate to be included? especially given that Minifig Customization Network is no longer updated and minifigures.co.uk is an affiliate site thats younger and smaller? I appreciate your (wikipedian's) decision regardless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.70.113 (talk) 16:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: This article needs some pictures of modern minifigures. It only has a picture of now antique minifigs, and that is the only picture in the article. It especially needs pictures in the "Variations" section.JoshE3 (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures needed 

message: An image used in this article, File:Lego-UFO-Red-Alien.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status as of 26 May 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lego-UFO-Red-Alien.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lego-UFO-Red-Alien.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: What would be good would be a photo of an individual minifigure, in an assembled state, and then in a disassembled state, showing all its parts. Can anyone do this? DS (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Representative photo 

message: Is it a coincidence that the original minifig head closely resembled the original smiley? jnestorius(talk) 13:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the minifig was designed in an attempt to be internationally and ethnically neutral, and if you'd like to make an iconic face, the necessary reduction of personal features would naturally lead to similar results. Considering the yellow skin color and the smile, I think that was likely chosen since it looked nicer than a white face with a straight mouthline. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smiley 

message: The article claims that there were seven different minifigures released in 1978, but there appears to be a lot more than that, judging by lists on Brickset and Bricklink. ,  惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Seven different minifigures in 1978

message: In the Collecting section it uses the acronym AFOL to explain that adults and children collect Lego minifigures. I don't see anywhere else in the artical that this is explained (unless I overlooked it). Wouldn't just 'adults' be better? 199.244.214.104 (talk) 19:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AFOL?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lego minifigure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060520185326/http://www1.lego.com/info/pdf/LEGO_company_profile_UK.pdf to http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/LEGO_company_profile_UK.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should the larger figures ("Lego family")   get a mention in the history section, in the sense that they were Lego's first "people" pieces, so were a precursor. Adpete (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  larger figures 1974-82 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion