lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nanny Ogg's Cookbook

message: The article shown mention if there are any recepies in the book (other than "bread and water"). Also are they any good - i.e., can you follow them in real life? thanks 109.65.199.169 (talk) 20:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are and yes you can. I've made most of them. Except the mint humbugs, which are that lovely green colour because there's arsenic in them.--Fahrenheit666 (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  recepies
Talk:Kidnapping of Peggy Ann Bradnick

message: I propose that this article should be moved/renamed "Kidnapping of Peggy Ann Bradnick" along the lines of Jaycee Dugard. This format follows Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Crime_victims_and_perpetrators. And besides, the article is mostly about the kidnapping anyway.  Any thoughts?  —Gccwang (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. See also .--Auric  talk 22:08, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I did it. Everyone still good? —Gccwang (talk) 22:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Just looked over the article, made some edits, and feel comfortable removing the copy-edit template. Mary Gaulke (talk) 18:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing copy-edit template 

message: What the heck is a "cheek-filler"? ('Kidnapping' subsection, third paragraph, second sentence: "He then took out a cheek-filler made from two wooden discs wired together. Peggy Ann, startled, said, "I think I know who you are...").  Rusty Lugnuts (talk) 05:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheek-filler 
Talk:The Science of Discworld II: The Globe

message: This is a call to arms to make the Terry Pratchett article a Featured Article. It will greatly help the cause if all the side articles that link from it are of a reasonable standard. Terry Pratchett has around 40 side articles (ie the ones relating to his work) - I don't think they are all expected to be GA (Good Article) standard for TP to become featured, but certain basic elements will be looked at for sure. 
A full list of the sub articles is here on the TP talk page: I'm posting this comment on the talk pages of each article on the list. Editors reading may also like to help with the TP article too? 
The main issue, especially with smaller articles, is often a finding reasonable amount of citations, and prose can sometimes be a little  POV too. Coverage of the topic is probably less important, but of course it needs to be reasonably good. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making [[Terry Pratchett]] a Featured Article 

message: I am not seeing any reviews... that's can't be right? ISFDb. @Cunard? (PS. I found one academic review) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cunard Thank you. I intend to incorporate those into the article shortly. I plan on reviewing other books by Pratchett over the coming days, particularly ones outside the main novels as many seem to have dubious notability (at least, on the surface, based on some quick checks I did); any reviews you'd post to their talk pages would be welcomed and I'd work them into the main body of articles over time. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, , for adding the sources to the article! I can check for reviews for the other books. Please ping me with any books that you need help finding sources for, and I'd be happy to help. Cunard (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Dark Horse Entertainment

message: This article includes lists that are problematic. For one, it has lists of such things as films based on Dark Horse Comics that includes Dr. Giggles, which was not based on a comic (although Dark Horse did issue a comic based on the film.) For another, these lists include projects such as Sin City, which while a film based on a Dark Horse publication, was not a Dark Horse Entertainment movie and should not be listed on a page that is ostensibly about DHE. I don't have time to clean this up at the moment, but much more reasonable list would be DHE TV projects and DHE comics projects, with asterisks indicating ones that were based on a DHC publication. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with lists 

message: An editor is insisting on including lists of productions that are not by Dark Horse Entertainment, without giving any reason why such lists belong in an article that's about Dark Horse Entertainment. Those are clearly off-topic for this article. I am (re)adding "off-topic" tags; those  should not be removed unless the sections are removed, or some consensus is reached here that they are somehow on-topic. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Movies for which Dark Horse at some point published a related comic book. Things like Sin City are not produced or distributed by Dark Horse Entertainment, Dark Horse Comics just has the comics license. These things have a place... in List of films based on Dark Horse Comics. They make no sense here in an article specifically about DHE. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off topic
Talk:The Unseen University Cut Out Book

message: "The book is definitely not for children: it is a challenging and entertaining project for adults, especially those with an interest in Discworld and the novels of Terry Pratchett."
I wouldn't doubt this, but I would say: according to WP-Standards this claim ("challenging and entertaining") needs a source. Sounds a lot like PR to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.170 (talk) 22:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Challenging and entertaining 

message: Effectively unreferenced, no reviews listed at ISFDb nor can I find any reliable. Ping @Cunard - I intend to AfD this in a little while. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cunard Thanks. A capsule review, a mention in passing and another very short capsule review in a series of such reviews. Pretty borderline, but perhaps asking for more input at AfD would be good (merge or keep, certainly not delete)? I think what we hav here is a bit too little for keeping this as a stand-alone entry, so I'd lean towards merge. @Daranios, @Jclemens - what do you think? Merge or AfD to gauge consensus? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is borderline as the sources are all on the short side in providing 96 words (), 123 words (), and 59 words () about the book. I agree that deletion would not be the right approach but am fine with a merge. Cunard (talk) 05:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Merging this into the UU article itself would actually give that article more evidence of real world notability. Jclemens (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I am fine with either keeping or merging the article. For the real-world-notability of Unseen University itself, the search for the Cut Out Book led me to this academic paper, which should go a long way towards establishing notability there (next to the sources mentioned in past deletion discussions), though the current state of that article isn't great. For the Cut Out Book, I came upone one more small bit of commentary in Discworld and the Disciplines, p. 69: "an amazingly detailed card-board model needing assembly, along the lines of the well-known paper model of the Globe Theatre." Daranios (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Golden Week (China)

message: It says in the article that "The "Labour Day Golden Week" began on May 1st (May Day) until 2008."This obviously doesn't make sense. Can someone amend it please?
203.118.53.209 (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Labour Day Golden Week

message: Looks like the interest in the search term died down over time. Also, is it newer than Japan's Golden Week? --Makkachin (talk) 12:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I was in China (Beijng, and Guilin area) in October 2023 and can confirm that it exists. Kurinurm (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the golden week still exist? 

message: The article previously had an unsourced statement claiming that the 2020 "Golden week" holiday was exceptionally extended to limit the spread of the Covid-19 virus.
1. If they extended it officially for the first time, that be big news yet I cannot find any media claiming that.
2. Instead I found many news articles saying that instead of forcing strict lockdowns. China reported that more than 600 million people freely travelled all over China during that week. (None of them mentioned an extension)https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/09/china-attractions-630-million-people-travel-during-golden-week.html
I edited it to remove the unsourced and likely incorrect statement. And instead added in that 2020 was a holiday where they allowed people to travel in vast levels during an ongoing pandemic. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1047519273 Nvtuil (talk) 07:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Golden Week
Talk:2008 Boston Red Sox season

message: I think a mention should be made about the Red Sox possibly setting an MLB record for consecutive sellouts on September 3 (See ) Tklalmighty (talk) 01:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me, not sure where we could implement it though.   jj137 (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I say the following places work best: as a separate section on this page, an addendum to the opening section on this page, or the 2008 section  on the main Sox page. Additionally, another place where it may be reasonable to note is  here. Tklalmighty (talk) 06:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The first one probably -- we should probably add a new section(s) in "Regular season" which covers details of the entire season, kind of like this one does.   jj137 (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it has already been done  on the Boston Red Sox page. Tklalmighty (talk) 22:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even so, it wouldn't hurt to add it to this page, considering there is barely any *content* (not including game logs, schedules, etc.).   jj137 (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add it immediately at the end of the intro paragraph in the top section.  It is noteworthy to the 2008 season.FrumpyTheClown (talk) 06:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sellout Streak 

message: Why is there no mention of the pre-season exhibition games against the Japanese teams? I would think that would be notable enough.173.76.109.232 (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan 
Talk:Farmington, ME (04938)

message: This page is different than the other Farmington, ME pages because the information is based on the zip code, but is accurate.
:We do not name article about cities by their zip code. This article duplicates the real Farmington (town), Maine article and should be deleted. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:2008 Chicago Cubs season

message: Since the schedule for the team is still tentative (though listed in full on their website), should either a) the existing games be removed, or b) the remaining schedule entries be filled in? Aeternitas827 (talk) 06:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fill it in with the tentative schedule. If, later, there are changes, we can just go and change them.   jj137 ♠ Talk 20:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schedule? 

message: I substituted the game log because it is only used in the one article. Every other season article for this year has them straight in the articles. It doesn't save any space putting it in a template, it simply makes it look like it does, it still takes the same amount of time to load the page. A template is used when an item is put on more than one page. —Borgardetalk 04:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game log 
Talk:Red Legs Greaves

message: "His nickname was based on a commonly used term for reddened legs often seen among the Scottish and Irish who took to wearing kilts in almost any kind of weather" This sounds speculative - a Barbadian born sailor, probably of lowland descent (surname is not Highland) is highly unlikely to be kilt-wearing. Also in almost any kind of weather is a redundant remark; kilts would have been the standard mode of dress in highland Scotland all year round, not just some summer fashion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kilt-wearing?
Talk:Diego Marín Aguilera

message: Every single reference for this article is broken/dead or doesn't lead to the correct pages (which don't seem to exist). Finding good references (books, journals, academic websites), at least in English, have proven very difficult. I am going to replace all the broken/dead in-line citations with a few questionable (but working) links at the end.-Godot13 (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced with inline citations.-Godot13 (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Cold Food Festival

message: This festival was definitly dead for hundreds year.--刻意(Kèyì) 17:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cold Food Festival is celebrated by Vietnamese people in the northern part of the country on the third day of the third lunar month This is actually Shangsi Festival.--刻意(Kèyì) 22:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misplaced section

message: Some more official sourcing on festival traditions here:
* . 
* .
* Also
* And this, although a snake entwined with a rabbit symbolizing a loving mother seems a bit much
* Vietnamese celebration
 — LlywelynII 09:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: The redirect Hansik has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  :3 F4U (they/it) 20:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Hansik]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Helsingin Suomalainen Yhteiskoulu

message: An important school. Please tell us more. Pics? References? Dahliarose 22:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: SYK is not even nearly oldest Finnish speaking school in Finland. At least Jyväskylän Lyseon Lukio (1858),Joensuun Lyseon Lukio (approximately 1860)and Oulun Lyseon Lukio(1874) are older and probably also many others. SYK may be the oldest Finnish speaking school in HELSINKI, but frankly I am not even sure of that. Therefore I deleted the sentence about SYK being oldest Finnish speaking school in Finland. 128.214.145.20 (talk) 11:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest Finnish speaking school?
Talk:Ridha Jawad Taqi

message: Google test for name:
*Ridha Jawad Taqi = 2340
*Ridha Jawad al-Taqi = 76
*Redha Jawad Taqi = 453
*Rida Jawad Taqi = 127
Based on this, propose move to Ridha Jawad Taqi AndrewRT(Talk) 22:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Normal Lyceum of Helsinki

message: An important school. Please tell us more. Pics? Refs? Ask at WP Schools for help. Dahliarose 22:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken at least one picture of this school but I don't know if it's good enough. JIP | Talk 18:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure your pictures will be fine. Let me know if you want any help. Dahliarose 19:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Qlimax

message: we should name some djs that play regularly in qlimax.
Gcancelado 22:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I couldn't help but notice there is no anthem for 2020, but I honestly feel like Sub Zero Project's Enter The Realm is this years anthem, no?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.64.23.196 (talk) 00:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qlimax 2020 anthem?
Talk:Baron Glentoran

message: This page (and the one it's linked to) says the peerage was created in July 1939, but List of United Kingdom by-elections (1931–1950) says that the resulting by-election didn't happen until February 1940 - is the date of the peerage creation correct? Timrollpickering 22:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Times for 15 July 1939 reports that the name, style and title of Baron Glentoran of Ballyalloly in the County of Down was conferred on Captain Herbert Dixon on 8 July. The London Gazette archive confirms it, and also that the return of Henry Peirson Harland in room of Lord Glentoran occurred on 10 February 1940. I would guess that either the Unionists expected a dissolution would overtake the byelection, or that the outbreak of war led to a delay. Sam Blacketer 23:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of creation
Talk:Mike Kelley (quarterback)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — MaterialWorks 17:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike Kelley (American football) →  – avoid confusion with Mike Kelley (offensive lineman); per WP:NCSP Joeykai (talk) 16:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 November 2023
Talk:List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas

message: :Discussion started to follow up from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas (2nd nomination)
Note this list-article currently starts with "This is a List of free-standing wedding chapels located in the Las Vegas Valley."  What should be said, if different, and which chapels should be included?
===About geographical locations===
*In my opinion, it is definitely best to include chapels in the Las Vegas Valley, a continuous area including part or all of Paradise, Nevada as well as the city of Las Vegas, Nevada.  Although the title of article should include simply "Las Vegas" meaning it broadly, not "Las Vegas Valley" because that is not a widely-understood term. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Which chapels to include

message: *In my opinion, it is definitely best to include chapels in the Las Vegas Valley, a continuous area including part or all of Paradise, Nevada as well as the city of Las Vegas, Nevada.  Although the title of article should include simply "Las Vegas" meaning it broadly, not "Las Vegas Valley" because that is not a widely-understood term. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: About geographical locations

message: *In my opinion, I do think that regular churches which occasionally have weddings, but which are not commercial in nature, should not be included.  Restricting membership here to "standalone wedding chapels" only would seem to eliminate those.  However, what to do about commercial wedding chapels such as the Sci-Fi Wedding Chapel, which is a commercial, cheesy thing like other wedding chapels in Las Vegas, but which is located within Bally's Casino complex?  It seems to me that this should be included, although it is not "standalone". --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: About standalone or not

message: *Many list-articles such as the huge system of lists of the 90,000 plus National Register of Historic Places in the U.S. include redlink items, suggesting that an article is wanted/needed.  Usual practice in list-articles is to include a redlink item where editors agree that an article is wanted/needed, and where there are supporting inline citations establishing that the item is the type of thing that should be included in the list and also that it appears to be Wikipedia-notable as a standalone article topic.  In this case, I think that redlinks should be allowed on that basis. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 20:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: About redlinks or not

message: *I think these should be allowed, partly for completeness' sake, i.e. so that we are not selectively endorsing, in effect, just some of the wedding chapels in Las Vegas.  And partly to head off creation of separate articles about marginal places, which can be covered well enough merely as list-items here. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 20:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: About unlinked items or not
Talk:Twmbarlwm

message: Have stated as low importance as part of WikiProject Wales. A few more facts or referenced lines would raise it to a mid level. The middle two paragraphs have much mid status comments, but all are probably, supposedly or believed to be. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2009

message: I think the 'pimple' term is a Newport one, as my parents and grand parents always referred to it in this way, looking over from the top of Ridgeway, hence the Raymond Glendenning reference added today. Franco1873 (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sept 2009

message: This site does not seem to function. Whoever included the link to it should investigate and repair. Thanks. CampKohler (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't find that site anywhere. Have replaced with a link to a page at caerphilly.gov.uk. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link rot: http://www.cwmbran.info/ 
Talk:Merton Abbey, London

message: I really don't see the need for this article. The area defined as being "Merton Abbey" is about a ¼ mile east-west and a ½ mile north-south and contains only about 15 to 20 roads most of which are short cul-de-sacs. Nearly half the area is taken up by commercial premises. This are is not really large enough to be described as a district of Merton nor a suburb, and I think most people who know the area would consider it to be Colliers Wood although they might say they were going to Merton Abbey if they were visiting the market.
Much of the information here is is taken from the Merton (historic parish) article and does not need repeating here. Some of the additional information - the remains of the Abbey in gardens in Liberty Road, the note about the Pickle Ditch and the old LIB dialling code might be worth adding to either the general Merton article or the Merton Priory article.
Incidentally, it is the Deen City Farm not the Dean City Farm - see http://www.deencityfarm.co.uk/.
--DavidCane 23:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question as to need
Talk:Aeritalia F-104S Starfighter

message: In this edit the primary units were switched to metric without discussion. It is a Lockheed (American) design, the F-104S flight manual dimensions and performance figures are all feet, inches, knots and miles. This change should be reverted, taking the opportunity to remove the myriad unsourced details in the specs section. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's a licensed production, I've no issue with using metric here. I think that's standard practice in most such articles, but I haven't surveyed it to be certain. I wholeheartedly support removing the myriad unsourced spec details. BilCat (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that most of the cn tags were added by the editor who added the data in question, in the same edit...Nigel Ish (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now cleaned up.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary units?