Talk:Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant

message: Can someone write about the great amounts of criticism; drunken staff (that was not allowed into the plant however) et.c, that has surfaced the latest weeks (in Sweden, at least). The full internal (confidential, before it leaked to the press) report from the power plant is available from Sveriges Television here (in Swedish). It shows quite a different picture than previous official statements did. This one is full of self-criticism, for example (freely translated) "any immediate improvements can not be seen directly after the transient [incident], even though that should have been the natural course of action". Kricke 22:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree some expansion on the topic is desirable. However, it should be an objectivised viewpoint. I am not sure the report would be referred to as confidential, but rather restricted (though, this is a question of semantics). Noticing that the ISO definition of confidentiality could really be applied to any document ("ensuring that information is accessible only to those authorized to have access"); by this definition we need to define "who is authorised to have access". In this case, the report is sent to SKI (SSM) which is a government authority and thus governed by the Freedom of information legislation act, so would be publicly available, and anyone should be considered authorised. So, bear in mind, the document is stamped as internal (to the company), generally indicating it shouldn't be available to Contractors, rather than making it secret. The incident with drunk staff is ambiguos, as firstly, the influenced people were obviously denied access to the plant, indicating the access control was working rather than the contrary, and secondly, the people in question were Contractors and not employees. Personally, I would be rather disappointed to see any immediate improvements after the event, as this would be a classical ad-hoc solution mitigating the effects instead of investigating root causes. Nonetheless, it is certain that the reasons for shortcomings should be under scrutiny and mitigated. The report does show the process was started, I'd be rather interested to see how it has been followed up! :ExScientiaVera (talk) 22:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critisism after the "July 2006 incident" 

message: The lede currently says "forcing the Soviet government to publicly acknowledge it after almost a day of hiding it from the world" - 
This seems to me a very contemporary cold-war black-and-white view of the matter. 
The way I've heard it in the documentations for the 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident, was, that the communication between locals and the state government was flawed, and that the Kremlin was not in the slightest aware of the size of the accident.
Maybe it would be more correct to say "forcing the Soviet government to investigate the happenings at Chernobyl" --BjKa (talk) 13:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviets NPOV 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312035543/http://www.sr.se/cgi-bin/International/nyhetssidor/artikel.asp?ProgramID=2054&Nyheter=&artikel=906598 to http://www.sr.se/cgi-bin/International/nyhetssidor/artikel.asp?ProgramID=2054&Nyheter=&artikel=906598
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100818003244/http://www.analys.se/lankar/Bakgrunder/2007/Bkg%201-07%20Forsmark%20Eng.pdf to http://www.analys.se/lankar/Bakgrunder/2007/Bkg%201-07%20Forsmark%20Eng.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220011550/http://www.svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=22620&a=631325 to http://svt.se/svt/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=22620&a=631325
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927111253/http://www.vattenfall.se/sv/file/teknisk-data_11336832.pdf to http://www.vattenfall.se/sv/file/Teknisk-data_11336832.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified