lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fugitive pigment

message: In Garth Lewis's book "2000 Color Combinations" an alternative definition is given for 'fugitive colors' as those which are non-primary mixed colors and more susceptible to simultaneous contrast than the more vibrant primary colors.  He mentions the phrase as being originated by Josef Albers (1888-1976).  Also described on page 224 of this book is the work by the French chemist Michel Chevreul working for a tapestry maker Gobelin and discovered that the appearance of fading of some colors in tapestries was in fact a powerful optical effect (simultaneous contrast) caused by juxtaposition of colors and founded much of the work by subsequent artists and designers. Tredigar (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A definitional consideration
Talk:Brainerd diarrhea

message: I responded to the "Orphan" tag (Feb 2009) by inserting links to other articles, but have hesitated to remove the tag myself; I thought only administrators can do that, right? If I'm wrong, in what circumstances is an I.P. Address User actually allowed to remove a tag that informs editors that there are issues on this article? Thanks if anyone does answer. Come to think of it, I might go ahead and ask that question at the Village Pump (or whatever it's called), since there might not be a significant amount of people accessing this talk page--but I'll check FAQ first. Regards, 24.10.181.254 (talk) 21:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked on one of the Help pages, and I was told that adding links to this article is not the way to solve the "orphan" problem. An orphan is an article that isn't linked to in very many pages. Under the Toolbox--> "What links here" for this article, only 6 or so pages link to this one. So please ignore my request to remove the "Orphan tag" from this page. I have added links to other pages on this one, but not vice-versa. So that still needs to be done. Sorry that I was mixed up. 24.10.181.254 (talk) 22:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feb 2009 "Orphan" tag
Talk:Budd–Chiari syndrome

message: According to a Pathoma lecture, but it's not mentioned here.
Avkrules (talk) 23:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lupus causes Budd-Chiari 

message: Occurs in Budd-Chiari, and AFP is a good marker.  JFW | T@lk 21:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hepatocellular carcinoma 

message: JFW | T@lk 12:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119421880/abstract - the DOI is broken. JFW | T@lk 05:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

text: http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/151/3/167 Large case series looking at risk factors and interventions. JFW | T@lk 05:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent review

message: hi this is dr naveed from karachi pakistan.
i came across a pt aged 20,with this deadly diseas,she is suffering from pharyngitis right now and i have perscribed her a erythromicin,a cough syrup and a anti pyretics.
can any body inform what precaution should i take while prescribing any medcine to her.
she is now controlled with no ascites.she had a history of heamatemesis for which gastric banding was performed.
waiting for the response.
regards.
dr,naveed
navidmahar_dowite@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.32.67 (talk) 07:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pharyngitis in budd-chiari syndrome pt.........??? 

message: British medicine rarely makes reference to "internists", that is an American term. He would be called a physician. --129.11.186.208 (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eponym
Talk:Campylobacteriosis

message: Why are there no references listed at the end of the page?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why

message: Questions should preferably be re-worded into statements -ZhongHan  (Email) 13:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of [[Campylobacteriosis#Treatment|Treatment section]]
Talk:Cholestasis

message: And the treatment is ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.143.244.34 (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Apart from the intro the article seems to be just about obstructive cholestasis ? - Rod57 (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No clear discussion of metabolic cholestasis 

message: The overall layout of the article could be improved by adding more images. For e.g., when discussing obstructive cholestasis, it would be helpful to have a diagram illustrating bile flow in the liver and highlighting where common blockages occur.--Nadees1 (talk) 03:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Suggestion 

message: We are a group of three students who will be editing this page over the next month as part of our course. We are intending to expand on the Signs and Symptoms, Causes, and Mechanisms sections using various quality secondary sources.Yangk59 (talk) 03:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team plan for improvement
Talk:Dubin–Johnson syndrome

message: "There is plenty of canalicular multi-drug resistant protein that causes bilirubin transfer to bile canaliculi."
-- Does this mean there are many different transporters involved or one is expressed at very high levels ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erkenntnis 2018 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear  

message: The citation for Epinephrine as the pigment generating substance is out-of-date / no longer accurate. The current 9th e. of Robbins does not contain mention of this. (UWorld claims this to be true as well, but I can't find this fact in a primary source)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samjwain (talk • contribs) 20:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pigment= Epinephrine Metabolites? 
Talk:Esophageal dilation

message: doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315414 JFW | T@lk 20:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK guidelines 

message: In American English, this is esophageal dilation, in British English it's oesophageal dilatation. This article title splits the difference which is pretty unique! I think probably we should pick one or the other? Mvolz (talk) 15:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I just moved it to the en-US name. Mvolz (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Should we pick one?!
Talk:Esophageal food bolus obstruction

message: The article states that giving Meat Tenderizer or Coca-Cola was often complicated by perforation of the esophagus.[12][13].
Article 12 is only about the use of meat tenderizers, and states that there is a slight increase in the rate of esophagitis.
Article 13 is about the use of Coca Cola, and in fact states clearly that the procedure is safe and with minimal likely adverse effects.
None of the articles mentioned above have any reference to an increase risk of Esophageal Rupture.
Therefore the Wikipedia article is (currently) incorrect to state that the risk of esophageal rupture is 'often' the result of these two interventions.
I think I will change the article to 'possible' rupture, but it may be more correct to state that esophageal rupture is a rare complication.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjwolfe (talk • contribs) 12:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Risk of Esophageal Rupture with Coca Cola or other Sparkling (fizzy) drinks. 

message: doi:10.1007/s00455-012-9434-9 shows some circumstantial evidence that glucagon may work in steakhouse syndrome. It may be less effective in eosinophilic oesophagitis, although this is a retrospective report and the numbers are small. JFW | T@lk 07:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: doi:10.1136/emermed-2014-204467.1 - bestBETs is negative on glucagon. JFW | T@lk 16:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't knock glucagon
Talk:Bezhin Meadow

message: I want to bring this article to FA status. I found it fascinating the more I read about it. 
I have started to compile sources at User:Lawrence Cohen/work/Bezhin Meadow. If possible, would anyone here be able to help me drum up more and post them to my page there (feel free to edit it)? I'd be willing to do the bulk of the heavy lifting, if needed. Thanks! Lawrence Cohen 20:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I want to help build this out

message: To build out the article further...
; Lead
Overview, of course. Its such a rich topic I'm waiting to build this out myself till the subsections are done even though its not proper in the interim.
; The original story, and Pavlik
More sourced information on the both the Turgenev original story, and the tale of Pavlik. The current section is basically material from the Pavlik article, which was not heavily sourced. 1-2 paragraphs, maybe 3?
; Background
More on what led to the film's creation, and why it was filmed. 1-2 paragraphs?
; Production section
Not one yet, possibly another paragraph. I want to pore through the collection of sources I already found for more technical information on the filming. The societal and general information is largely covered I think
; Film Plot
I think I may need to download the film from somewhere. Another full paragraph, most likely. It's not a long film.
; Legacy
Detailed information on it's legacy. What was it's impact on the Soviet Union? The rest of the world? How did it affect Soviet cinema and the arts? What about the rest of the world?
; Study or Analysis of Bezhin Meadow
There are an amazing number of books, essays, and materials on this film that was never finished, properly screened, or released. Could be a good section.
Any other suggestions? Lawrence Cohen 21:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needed sections and info

message: Failure? I recognize there's an issue of NPOV to be dealt with, & I frankly don't have a better word in mind, but calling a film that was suppressed by the Sov gov't a failure strikes me as NPOV in a pro-Sov direction...  TREKphiler hit me ♠  04:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, so do you think a film no one ever saw should be regarded as a success? The reasons for its failure are heavily discussed in the article, so I cannot see what your complaint is. --86.128.12.102 (talk) 13:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moscow, we have a problem

message: Since the film doesn't survive, is the running time of a reconstructed version (overestimated, by the way--it's 26:17 on the Criterion Alexander Nevsky DVD) even appropriate?  I do not believe it was intended to be a short film. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 03:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Running time

message: The infobox states the budget to be two million Russian ruble. but shouldn't it be Soviet ruble instead? TryKid [dubious – discuss] 19:14, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian ruble?
Talk:Delegate model of representation

message: The link to Burke's speech is dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.33.180 (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Is there any objection to moving this article to Delegate and trustee models of representation, then redirecting the trustee model to it? These two models are invariably discussed together. Neutralitytalk 00:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Pendlebury

message: There is a seperate article on Agecroft Hall which is just a stub at the moment. Shouldn't most of the text from the Agecroft Hall section of this article be moved to there with a link from this article? Richerman (talk) 00:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As there was no discussion I've moved a lot of the text now. Richerman (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agecroft Hall 

message: A source is needed for applying "Lumns" to Agecroft.  The nearby (and interconnected) Clifton Hall Colliery was just off Lumns Lane and was locally known as "Lumns", Lumms" or "Lumbs" according to testimony at the inquest.
 Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumns 

message: How van I Exchange a tenis that I receites feo You and are to big.
My info.
Luchogo2008@live.com 2603:9001:90C:6099:3197:B793:D81B:BF98 (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exchange
Talk:Margaret Kemble Gage

message: The article says there is no evidence that Margaret Gage was an informer for the rebels, and the claim comes from one book written two hundred thirty years after the events. Why is this claim in the article at all? The Gages had children together after they left America, so their marriage was evidently solid. The "popular culture" section here is even worse, being unsourced and making a further claim with no proof. Under the idea of WP:Bold, I will remove them and see what happens. But a revert should have some basis better than "Someone says it's true."Princetoniac (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to query the claim, too. As currently written, the section on whether or not she's a spy looks like it's fleshed out and well sourced, but that's because most of it is actually just detailing uncontroversial historical fact (the details of the Lexington and Concorde expedition) or trying to turn such fact into innuendo (that Gage sent his wife home after the siege of Boston began). It's not clear that there's really any citation to the claim itself that she might have been a Patriot spy. If one of the cited works does say "Margaret Gage was (or might have been) a Patriot spy", that should be made clearer in the article; if it doesn't, the section should probably be junked. IMHO. Binabik80 (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spy allegation
Talk:Gastric varices

message: The intro endoscope image is difficult for readers with no knowledge of the subject to interpret.  Where or what are the varices in this picture?  Can someone add an arrow or circle to the image to indicate the varices, and/or add more descriptive words to help?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.46.114.221 (talk) 18:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro image
Talk:Gastric volvulus

message: Hi,
A link were put in a <references> block: http://www.ectopic.org.uk/index.php/patients/symptoms-and-diagnosis/symptoms-diagnosis-faqs/
Could you see where it could be added?
;Tips
:You can use the  template to properly format your link citation.
:A reference is put inline in the text, protected by  tags.
:You need to add at the article bottom the following line to print the footnotes: 
:Help:Footnotes contains every needed explanation.
Thank you. --Dereckson (talk) 08:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Gastrointestinal bleeding

message: *
--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The ref use to justify giving iron in GI bleeds  is 1) a primary source 2) is about IBD and not GI bleeds. Please use secondary sources about the topic in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing

message: ... of PPI might be equivalent to infusions in high-risk bleeding ulcers doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4056 JFW | T@lk 11:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Boluses

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.14599 JFW | T@lk 13:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restarting anticoagulation
Talk:2002–03 San Antonio Spurs season

message: Needs a lot more sources. Could use more text, too. 24.29.56.240 (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Ileocecal valve

message: The first sentence: "The ileocecal valve, or ileocaecal valve, is a papillose structure with physiological sphincter muscle situated at the junction of the small intestine (ileum) and the large intestine, with recent evidence indicating an anatomical sphincter may also be present in humans" is quite confusing and I had to read it several times to (I think) understand what it means.  At first, I had understood it was not known in humans, but actually, I guess it means that it has also a sphincter function that was not known, though it contains a sphincter-like muscle.  Is that right? It should probably rephrased. Loqueelvientoajuarez (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: Clinical significance: When Auscultating for bowel sounds, start auscultating at the Ileocecal valve area because bowel sounds are normally always present in this locatation. Source: Jarvis Physical examination & health assessment 2nd edition. (page 559)
I have a PDF textbook to share if someone can help me edit the article as this is my first time editing wikipedia. QuadeJaworski (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi QuadeJaworski! I know it was a while since your offer to help with information on bowel auscultation, but I would be happy to help. If you edit the section titled "Clinical significance" by adding new content at the bottom, then that would be brilliant. When you click the edit button, a new screen will appear - make sure that you are using "Visual editing". I'm watching the page, so I can "clean up" any edits you make by adding wikilinks. Bibeyjj (talk) 11:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auscultation of Ileocecal valve 

message: The sources say it's the bowels, before and after the valve, that does the absorption. It's not the valve that does that. Statement removed.  --Hjordmån (talk) 10:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed sentence on absorption
Talk:Unity Resources Group

message: Please do not delete other peoples' work on this article without discussion or explanation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.9.148.25 (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on editing: 

message: I've made some changes:
* moved paragraphs from the introduction to the 'Background' and 'Services' sections. They seemed overly detailed for an introductory overview, and smacked somewhat of advertising.
* changed mention of company foundation from 1996 to 2000, as reference cited did not support 1996 date.
* changed the description of Unity in the intro, adding the words "private military and security consulting". Without some description of that sort, there's no way of quickly learning what the company actually does without looking at the infobox or reading further into the article.
* removed 'unknown parameters' from the infobox.
If I've got something factually wrong, or overdid the rewrite, please feel free to revert. I'm not an expert in the field.
(Thought I'd best detail my changes after seeing the 2011 comment above by 147.9.148.25). Meticulo (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite of May 2016 

message: I just tried to look at the homepage of the company and is was not available.
Does anybody have information about this?Raketenbohne (talk) 10:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homepage not available 

message: I need a capable man to accompany my associate to Columbia, it's an inheritance pick up , we all know what these things are and aren't. What's important is that the 2 of you leave the same day.secure her perimeter assess input and output and prossess the routine..guys it would be a pleasure and a privilege to work with you all. My contact no :- +61 423384186 / Steven James Flavell.. 49.195.91.214 (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employment..
Talk:The Monkees discography

message: There is an additional item for the discography.
An EP released is 1980 reached number 33 in the UK singles chart (in the top100 for 9 weeks).
Unfortunately I do not know the track listing. 
15/03/1980 The Monkees The Monkees EP 33 
81.77.47.152 21:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Possibly only released in Britain & rest of Europe - on amazon Us as an import cd. Copy I have is labelled 'limited edition' (don't remember if their ever was a single cd edition) 2cds 1st is a best of w/ hits etc + a bonus disc compilation of "the best and most bizarre of those off-cuts and out-takes" from the Missing Link sets. IIRC (from reviews/music press coverage) this was the first time Alternate/Alternative Title got released in Britain under it's original name of Randy Scouse Git. Booklet has notes by Peter Doggett. 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Definitive-Monkees/dp/tracks/B000059QC0/ref=dp_tracks_all_2#disc_2
http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Monkees/dp/tracks/B000059QC0/ref=dp_tracks_all_1#disc_1
109.224.137.121 (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another missing album - The Definitive Monkees WEA @2001 

message: Would it be okay if albums released in the United Kingdom only were added to this page? Since there is at least one album that was released in the UK that I wanted to add to the page. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 06:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Monkees UK albums to the discography 

message: I can't think of a valid justification for including their material on the Monkees discography.  They were not released as Monkees music and the material has never seen a release as Monkees music (unlike, say, "Christmas Is My Time of Year").  It should be removed and replaced with a "see also" to the D,J,B&H article. 2002:620D:3AF:0:3CD2:3107:318A:6533 (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dolenz, Jones, Boyce & Hart
Talk:William Deidrick

message: Ther seems to be some contention on whether the article's subject is spelled "Deidrick" or "Diedrick". I looked up his patent and found that he signed as "Deidrick". Unless we can find better secondary sources, I see no reason not to go with what Deidrick himself wrote. Huon (talk) 01:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Paneth cell

message: There's a duplication of a paragraph, that is found both in the introduction and a section called secretions. Where is the right place for that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mifam (talk • contribs) 09:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redundency 

message: The image of the Paneth cell thumb|250px|Paneth cells appears to be a copyright violation.  The same image appears in the Encyclopaedia Britannica website under Paneth cells http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/441200/Paneths-cell#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked&title=Paneth%E2%80%99s%20cell%20--%20Britannica%20Online%20Encyclopedia, yet the image data here suggests it is the creator's own photo.  However, the creator's talk page is dotted with small warnings about appropriate sourcing of images, use of tags etc. Can an admin look into this please?
:This message is also posted at the user's talk page and at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions
Mattopaedia (talk) 23:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The image at EB is credited to jpogi and per this, EB "claims no compilation copyright in images or materials that are subject to the GNU Free Documentation License or similar licenses" and "Photographs and illustrations are copyrighted by their respective owners, as noted in the credits." Presuming the two jpogi's are the same, jpogi has released the photo under GFDL. The wiki image has appropriate metadata and is much higher resolution than the EB image. I don't see a problem here. Franamax (talk) 06:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Fine then. I've uploaded the image to the Commons. --CopperKettle (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 

message: This page is embarrassing to WP. I will try but wow what a mess.--Akrasia25 (talk) 18:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Editing needed

message: I believe I have added enough research and medical sources. Is it OK to remove? Irena.Buskova (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  May the "medical citations needed" box be removed?