Talk:Regulatory economics

message: Anyone up for creating an article on history of American government intervention in the economy? I think it would serve well to dispell the myth, that seems to be going around, that the U.S. economy used to be a laissez-faire sytem. RJII 19:27, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also, why does this article have a longer criticism portion than the actual article.RVRLaw (talk) 12:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added "Regulatory Capture" to the Lead for context because for one reason, "regulation" seems to be defined here with no context, in a vacuum as if say, the properties of "regulation" were undiluted, or fixed in stone or even omnipotent. Regulatory Capture is one way to put it back in the context of the real world and suggest another way that regulatory agencies and regulations may effect the actual population.  --69.110.90.54 (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added "Regulatory Capture" for context 

message: Dr. Cebula has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Cebula has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Cebula, Richard & Clark, Jeff, 2014. "Economic Freedom, Regulatory Quality, Taxation, and Living Standards," MPRA Paper 58108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 00:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Cebula's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Calzolari has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Calzolari has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Carlo Scarpa & Giacomo Calzolari, 2009. "On Regulation and Competition: Pros and Cons of a Diversified Monopolist," Working Papers 2009.55, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Calzolari's comment on this article 

message: The article is generally well written and I found no spelling or grammar problems. What should possibly be worked on is an expansion of certain key areas and concepts within the article. The idea of information asymmetry is not thoroughly explained and could do with an expansion. Likewise the section involving regulatory capture should highlight that another typical issue with regulation is that many of the regulators often come from the industry they are regulating and so have prexisting ties. There were also a few statements which did not appear to be directly cited and should have their citations added. Other than that the article looks well conceived and formatted. JarrodE (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the detailed feedback! It gives us a lot to focus on. Bcambri95 (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POL 150C Peer Review 

message: I noticed some sections were missing citations, maybe you could find something in this paper or its sources? https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1013661106129
Maybe you could list some examples of regulatory capture?
This one might help with the deregulation section: https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/114/4/1437/1934050/What-Drives-Deregulation-Economics-and-Politics-of
I don't know if this is neutral enough, but perhaps you could mention democratic and republican views in the proponents and opponents section, since there tends to be a split along those lines.
Otherwise looks pretty good! Martin niemiec (talk) 07:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for providing resources with your recommendations! This should help us make the information stronger. Bcambri95 (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Bit of Peer Review

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Regulatory economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720083041/http://www.iceaustralia.com/apsacc2011/pdf/papers07/day1_24oct07/StreamA2/RegulatoryCaptureManagingTheRisks_JohnBoyd.pdf to http://www.iceaustralia.com/apsacc2011/pdf/papers07/day1_24oct07/StreamA2/RegulatoryCaptureManagingTheRisks_JohnBoyd.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408193105/http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi2007/pdf/booklet_decade_of_measuring_governance.pdf to http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi2007/pdf/booklet_decade_of_measuring_governance.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050908161704/http://www.sprott.com/pdf/pressrelease/TheVisibleHand.pdf to http://www.sprott.com/pdf/pressrelease/TheVisibleHand.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified