lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maximos V Hakim

message: "Another stock quotation down the years has been that, supposedly, of the Greek-Catholic Archbishop of Galilee. For example, Israel's Abba Eban told the U.N. Special Political Committee in 1957 that the Archbishop had "fully confirmed'." that the Arabs were urged to flee by their own leaders. 
I wrote to His Grace, asking for his evidence of such orders. I hold signed letters from him, with permission to publish, in which he has categorically denied ever alleging Arab evacuation orders; he states that no such orders were ever given. He says that his name has been abused for years; and that the Arabs fled through panic and forcible eviction by Jewish troops." - Childers 
What Eban actually said Hakim said was:
"The refugees had been confident that their absence from Palestine would not last long; that they would return within a few days [or] within a week or two; their leaders had promised them that the Arab armies would crush the 'Zionist gangs' very quickly and that there would be no need for panic or fear of a long exile." 
Eban does not say that Hakim says that there were orders, or that Hakim "fully confirmed" that there were orders.  In a way Childers is beating a straw man, which he actually acknowleges himself when he says, in his essay The Wordless Wish, (ref on article page): "It will be noted that this statement does not, in fact, allege that the Arab leaders ordered Palestine civilians to evacuate."
Still, I thought it important to include more of Childers' letter from the Archbishop, even though Childers is a highly biased source, because it throws more light on the Bishop's thoughts on the matter, and the article is, after all,  about the Bishop.  Snakeswithfeet (talk) 07:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Childers and orders
Talk:George Stickney House

message: Per the sign in front of the house, it dates to 1904.  the reference does not say Stickney built this particular house.  1836 looks to be way too early; the county was not even platted at that time and no way to get all the fancy materials in.  I will change this date to 1904 unless someone offers better evidence tomorrow.Skates61 (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of House is 1865 not 1836
Talk:D-DOPA

message: Is there any information about the pharmacology of this chemical?—Preceding unsigned comment added by  216.68.11.254 (talk • contribs) 
I vote to delete this page as it has no relevance. L-dopa is widely used and there is lots of information about it, but D-dopa is insignificant and has no therapeutic or research applications that i am aware of. 198.142.37.170 03:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information on pharmacology

message: D-Dopa isn't especially interesting as it hasn't been found to be useful in anything, so why not merge this with L-Dopa? 90.210.129.201 (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge With L-Dopa?
Talk:Eyal Golan

message: Re: HaMelech
Eyal Golan is known as "HaMelech" because he is viewed as the successor of the previous Mizrahi "Melech", Zohar Argov. 130.49.135.32 18:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i've heard him sing yemeni and moroccan folk songs; what are his ancestral roots?  128.208.35.52 01:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  origins 

message: In 2018 Golan was awarded by the head of the "Lobby for Israeli Songs" (member Nava Boker). This was objected by five other of the seven members of that lobby. That award is not a formal award by the Knesset, though the ceremony was in the Knesset. Tzafrir (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award in the Knesset 

message: That title may be wrong. Here is a short update.
In 2013 most of the talk was about allegations of statutory rape. A recent documentary by Orly Vilnai and Guy Maroz (Hebrew Video, potentially useful search for Hebrew results) reignited the public discussion. Specifically it seems that the main allegations (even those that were investigated by the police) focused mostly in allegations of pimping young groupies of Golan.
Golan sued Vilnai and Maoz in the past (before the documentary was published. They settled out of court, and there seem to be mixed reports of both sides as for the terms of that settlement. Meanwhile it is reported that three of the former groupies are now launching their own civil damages suite against Golan. Tzafrir (talk) 05:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statutory rape: less of an issue
Talk:Zahid Al-Sheikh

message: The nominator offered two reasons why they thought this article should be deleted.
#They think "Being accused of being a terrorist is not grounds for notability."
#They felt the article did not comply with the wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.
Tackling these justifications in reverse order -- WP:DEL has a table listing different kinds of concerns a wikipedia contributor might have, and how they should address those concerns.  According to that table a perceived POV is not ground to nominate an article for deletion. -- If a perceived POV is not grounds for {afd} then surely it is not grounds for a {prod}.
With regard to the nominator's first concern, well
#Zahid Al-Sheikh was not simply accused of being a terrorist.  Zahid Al-Sheikh's alleged association with terrorism is being used as a justification for the indefinite detention, without charge, of other individuals.
#Zahid Al-Sheikh is alleged to be the director of an organization listed as a terrorist organization on Executive Order 13224.  
I have been doing a lot of work on the articles about individual Guantanamo captives, and the articles related to them.  I have started possibly a dozen, or two dozen articles about significant individuals who were mentioned in captives Combatant Status Review Tribunals or Administrative Review Board hearings.  They start small.  But sometimes I determine that the  American intelligence analysts used an idiosyncratic spelling of the individual's name, and I can merge the info into a previously existing article.  Sometimes other captive's proceedings add to  what is known about the individual, and I can start to flesh it out.  In a number of cases I have come across other DoD documents to flesh out the articles.
The relative brevity of this article is not necessarily indicative of its importance.
Cheers!  --  Geo Swan 18:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I am removing the {prod} tag

message: Need Arabic script for name. Badagnani (talk) 00:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Arabic
Talk:Theophilus of Antioch

message: I propose this section be deleted entirely, or completely rewritten so as to make this clear that this is the conjecture of conditionalists, and not an established objective fact. NeonShadows (talk) 01:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Conditional immortality and resurrection"

message: 'Alternatively!' The terms 'Logos & Sophia' relate directly to Gnosticism as they are explicitly referred to as Aeons of the Pleroma, especially in Valentinianism. The terms do not feature as a pair of beings in Greek Philosophy although they may be ultimately derived from Platonism. Valentinius is credited as believing in God as 'Three hypostases'. If Theophilus was indeed the first to used the term Trinity to refer to the Father, Logos & Sophia, then his precedent is Gnostic.
"Alternatively, the references to the Logos and Sophia (wisdom) may be ideas taken from Greek philosophy or Hellenistic Judaism. The concept of intermediate divine beings was common to Platonism and heretical Jewish sects. In Proverbs 8 Wisdom (as feminine consort) is described as God's Counsellor and Workmistress, who dwelt beside Him before the creation of the world."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.197 (talk) 14:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Logos & Sophia

message: The article seems footnoted in a scholarly fashion. However, these may not have all translated. Some are "ibid" which is great if no one has inserted anything between! Others are "ii" and "iii" which I am guessing refers to his own "Divinarum Institutionum". May need to be inserted if true.Student7 (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes
Talk:The Shipping News (film)

message: The overview talks largely about changes from the book - shouldn't it really talk about the film in its own right, and then have a section about the changes ? -- Beardo (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview
Talk:Wycliffe

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support as nom. -Patstuarttalk|edits 18:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support as nom. -Patstuarttalk|edits 18:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: # Oppose. A quick check of some of the links presently linking to this disambig page showed one to the proposed primary meaning, one to the Bible translators, two to the TV show and one to the TV character. It is far easier to check and fix broken links to dab pages than broken links to primary topics. My survey shows it should remain a dab page. --Scott Davis Talk 12:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Collaboration of the month/current

message: Please add the following bot code to this page:

--.:Alex:. 18:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this page even perhaps be semiprotected, so that us regulars can edit it without requiring an admin? It's not really a high-traffic template, at least not any more than, say WT:VG/TD. Gary King (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I agree. It hardly constitutes "high-risk." --.:Alex:. 19:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unprotected (well, reduced to semi-protection).  The page is transcluded on less than 100 pages.  Feel free to make your edit. - Rjd0060 (talk) 22:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I pasted in the code. Someone tell me if I did it incorrectly :) Gary King (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New code 

message: * 53357 transclusions, I am protecting. Rich Farmbrough, 22:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection?
Talk:William Robert Ware

message: This article notes that he was born into a family of Unitarian clergy…  Does that include his predecessor, William Ware, who studied to be a Unitarian minister at Harvard?  I couldn’t find any sources on the subject. — crism (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to William Ware? 
Talk:Gregorios of Parumala

message: The title of the article is very long. Why cant it just be Mor Gregorios of Parumala or even just Gregorios of Parumala. Those are simpler and easier to understand.
ܠܝܛܘ  Liju  ലിജു לג"ו (talk) 16:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With apologies for coming in four years later, I agree with the above. WP:COMMONNAME applies and it seems likely that Gregorios of Parumala is the correct title. Please note that official names do not trump common names here. - Sitush (talk) 07:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Gregorios of Parumala is a definitely a good option. But we need to consider the fact that he is commonly known as Parumala Thirumeni. Varkeymanavalan (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 

message: At present, we only have one source and I'm not convinced of its reliability. For example, it names Peter III as the Antioch in 1876, which I have over-ridden in the article because it is clearly wrong. It also says that Gregorios died on 12 November but the photo of his tomb clearly states 2 November. Since the article already said the latter, I've left it as such for now.
We really need reliable academic books for articles such as this, not dodgy websites. - Sitush (talk) 11:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: It has been claimed by an IP user that the Syriac Orthodox Church does not have a canonization process, and so has cast doubt on the declarations in this article. I have removed some of the claims pending verification by WP:RS. Elizium23 (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canonization
Talk:Joseph Ward (1838–1889)

message: I put a 'citation-needed' warning in the bottom of the post. If I happen to be wrong, or if it's in the wrong place, feel free to contact me and correct my mistake. --Umalee 18:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Alan Chin (photographer)

message: See Alan Chin for the full edit history for this page. CiaranG 18:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 18:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:April Lee Hernández

message: Why cast a 27 year old as a high school student ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freedom Writers 
Talk:Charles H. Willey

message: :Charles H. Willey refers to "the hurricane that wrecked USS Memphis." 
:USS Tennessee (ACR-10) says, "Memphis was driven ashore by an unexpected tsunami and totally wrecked."
:DANFS says, "On the afternoon of 29 August, while at anchor in the harbor of San Domingo, a series of very close tsunami-like waves inundated the harbor, almost wrecking gunboat Castine and driving Memphis ashore. The waves were so steep they flowed over the armored cruiser, including the bridge and even the stacks, and repeatedly battered the warship into the harbor bottom."
:Willey's Medal of Honor citation says, "For extraordinary heroism in the line of his profession while serving on board the U.S.S. Memphis, at a time when that vessel was suffering total destruction from a hurricane while anchored off Santo Domingo City, 29 August 1916."
So was it a hurricane, or a tsunami? Or maybe tsunami-like waves caused by a hurricane?
—wwoods 18:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of ''Memphis''' shipwreck?
Talk:USS Tennessee (ACR-10)

message: :Charles H. Willey refers to "the hurricane that wrecked USS Memphis." 
:USS Tennessee (ACR-10) says, "Memphis was driven ashore by an unexpected tsunami and totally wrecked."
:DANFS says, "On the afternoon of 29 August, while at anchor in the harbor of San Domingo, a series of very close tsunami-like waves inundated the harbor, almost wrecking gunboat Castine and driving Memphis ashore. The waves were so steep they flowed over the armored cruiser, including the bridge and even the stacks, and repeatedly battered the warship into the harbor bottom."
:Willey's Medal of Honor citation says, "For extraordinary heroism in the line of his profession while serving on board the U.S.S. Memphis, at a time when that vessel was suffering total destruction from a hurricane while anchored off Santo Domingo City, 29 August 1916."
So was it a hurricane, or a tsunami? Or maybe tsunami-like waves caused by a hurricane?
—wwoods 18:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of ''Memphis''' shipwreck?
Talk:Nobuhiro Tajima

message: Article speaks in future tense about Suzuki World Rally Team debuting in 2008, however this is now clearly in the past. Someone who knows about the current state of the team and what happened should update this section.
TwistedKestrel (talk) 20:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update tag
Talk:Right to counsel

message: At least one source suggests that the right to council is only guaranteed in a criminal case if your liberty, not your property, is in jeopardy. So in at least certain criminal cases if the only thing that's in jeopardy is your property you may not be entitled to a right to council.
Ladar Levison from Lavabit writes
"With such short notice, my first attorney was unable to appear alongside me in court. Because the whole case was under seal, I couldn't even admit to anyone who wasn't an attorney that I needed a lawyer, let alone why. In the days before my appearance, I would spend hours repeating the facts of the case to a dozen attorneys, as I sought someone else that was qualified to represent me. I also discovered that as a third party in a federal criminal indictment, I had no right to counsel. After all, only my property was in jeopardy – not my liberty. Finally, I was forced to choose between appearing alone or facing a bench warrant for my arrest. "
[emphasis added]
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140520/06343727291/ladar-levison-explains-how-us-legal-system-was-stacked-against-lavabit.shtml
A more reliable source might be needed for now but if this is true it is probably worth mentioning in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.185.88.189 (talk) 03:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible constraints or exceptions

message: If I read this right, in the United Kingdom, at present, a criminal defendant can be tried and convicted without representation by counsel and none will be provided if they cannot afford representation. An appeal on the grounds of inadequate representation would produce what result? Would there be any part of European law which would apply with respect to these questions? Fred Bauder 16:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: United Kingdom

message: This article is based on the premise that the only laws regarding a right to counsel have to do with the right to counsel in a criminal case.  There is a right to counsel in some non-criminal (i.e. civil) cases in many countries.  This article doesn't address those at all.  If it's only talking about the right to counsel in the context of criminal law, then the name of the article needs to be changed!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.77.26 (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate premise
Talk:San Jacinto Mall

message: I've cleaned up the history section some, and added an infobox, but the article still needs some research to get it out of the pure "trivia" category which, at this point, almost borders on POV. This would be a lot easier if The Baytown Sun's website didn't delete articles after a couple months. I'm finding links to articles about the mall on their site that, unfortunantly, no longer exist. Heh. --DMAJohnson 19:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Crow Rate

message: I think this article as is has a grain farmer's and left wind slant.  An importaint chapter is missing and that is the Crow Offest Subsidy introduced by the Alberta governemtn.  This subsidy was paid to feedlot, and industiral grain users (possably Alberta flour mills) to offset the Crow wich was seen as hurting the Alberta ecconomy.  Saskatchewan was lobbied by her cattlemen to have a crow offset subsidy, Ablerta responded by increasing it subsidy and Ontairio cattlemetn were to be givine a Crom Offset Subsidy subsidy, which is why the Chretchien governemnt scraped the crow.  I'm not sure all of the details but this is an importaint and I think would be the biggest contribtuion to theis article. BKnoss 16:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't have a lot of time just now, but to re-count my edit comment, the absence of any information/discussion on this hated policy (in the West) and how it was deliberatley designed to pevent hte growht of manufacturing industries (and concomitant populations) in the WEst that would threaten those in Ontario and Quebec is such a glaring absence that while it's clearly an oversight it's a higyly POV-driven oversight; a lot of WEstern history is "Ontario-washed" and this is one clear case where "all that is known/remembered is the way Toronto/Montreal wants it".  Similarly any mention on the Kenora page of the Rat Portage dispute and how the loss of that region prevented the growht of heavy industry in fledgling Manitoba.  A lot of "national" history articles avoid this kind of thing, presumably because it's POV to talk about; but POVs are part of the universe, and this particular one was such a hot button issue in Western Canada for decades upon decades it's amaazing that any "reliable" source makes no mention of it.  I'll be back later but I'm always disapopinted to find such half-written articles on importtant topics, politically-charged or not....Skookum1 (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issues
Talk:Stonewall Inn

message: There is a question here which also is relevant to this article. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Manager at the time & Florida continuation

message: I'm using this NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission report as a source for Stonewall's background and architecture. Although the LPC report generally cites what we would consider to be WP:RS, the last paragraph of page 11 (which is about the history of this bar after 1990) cites this revision of the article. In general, the pre-1990 information in the LPC report is cited to books, reports, and internal documents. The various changes of ownership were not even mentioned in the previous version of the article. However, the report should be avoided for any post-1990 information, as it cites this article directly. Epicgenius (talk) 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note about the LPC source
Talk:Glucono delta-lactone

message: Since glucono delta-lactone is naturally occurring, does it have a common name? --Iustinus 19:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Common name

message: I have seen 1 or 2 supplement companies promote this preservative as a probiotic... But I haven't seen much on this, other than the promotional pages. Can anyone provide insight on this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.79.123.245 (talk) 05:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDL as a probiotic? 

message: * http://www.google.cn/search?hl=zh-CN&newwindow=1&q=%E8%91%A1%E8%90%84%E7%B3%96-%CE%B4-%E5%86%85%E8%84%82+gov.cn&btnG=Google+%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&aq=f&oq=
* http://product.cheminfo.gov.cn/K0115/K01150901.htm
--222.64.215.26 (talk) 09:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chinese translation of the chemical are based on the following.... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&newwindow=1&q=glucono%20delta-lactone%20acceptable%20daily%20intake&aql=&oq=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws
--222.64.215.26 (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about the ADI.... 

message: To add to article: what is it made from/how is it made? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: To add to this article (in order to make it properly encyclopedic):  this compound's effects on human health. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Health
Talk:Suleiman Frangieh (politician, born 1965)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to "Suleiman Frangieh (politician, born 1965)"  (t · c) buidhe 03:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Suleiman Frangieh Jr. →  – Better fitting name Maudslayer (talk) 13:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 October 2020
Talk:Tatuada en tus besos

message: The article No Vendrá has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:Singles generally do not meet WP:V and WP:N, no mention of notability no references.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[No Vendrá]]