Talk:ACT Policing

message: To whom it may concern.
There have been a number of edits to this talk page complaining about the behaviour of the Australian Federal Police.
This page is for discussion about the content of the article, and is not an effective or appropriate place to try to address issues about the police force itself.  This is an encyclopedia and it is not able to assist in resolving issues, real or perceived, with the police force itself.
If you have issues with the police force itself, and-or its members, you need to report them via the AFP website, specifically, Feedback and Complaints.
Or you can contact the Commonwealth Law Enforcement Ombudsman.
Or you can contact the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity.
Aoziwe (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate forum for behaviour of police 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on ACT Policing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110422160608/http://www.police.act.gov.au/~/media/act/pdf/2010-2011-purchase-agreement.ashx to http://www.police.act.gov.au/~/media/act/pdf/2010-2011-purchase-agreement.ashx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427054042/http://www.afp.gov.au:80/media_releases/national/2007/act_chief_police_officer_found_deceased to http://www.afp.gov.au/media_releases/national/2007/act_chief_police_officer_found_deceased
*Added  tag to http://www.nswhwpp.fotopic.net/c1534772.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the .ashx file is actually a .pdf Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Content found on the page is to create a fake organisation which does not exist in reality.
There are NO facts to be obtained via a court system where the police settle sexual abuse cases made against the police through the use of any non-pubic-court-process and under condition of keeping the case a secret  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.119.121 (talk) 14:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide some sources such a newspaper stories, or journal articles that talk about this.  Then someone can write about it in the article.  But we don't include information that one person has discovered by themselves, as that is WP:original research. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

text: Please try and understand that Wikipedia articles are only intended to reflect information which can be verified in independent reliable sources. Editors are asked to summarize the information they find in such sources in their own words and in a neutral manner. Negative content about the ACT can be added to the article, but it has to be worded in a neutral manner and it has to reflect coverage received in reliable sources. Wikipedia's role is not to to take a stand or to try and right some great wrong. Moreover, "reliable source" has a specific meaning when it comes to Wikipedia and typically only sources which are considered to have an established and strong reputation of editorial control are generally considered appropriate. Blogs, personal websites, social media accounts, etc. are considered to be user generated content and are generally not considered reliable for Wikipedia. So, if you are able to find stories about issues related to the ACT which have been covered by major newspapers, magazines, etc., it may be possible to add such content to the article as long as doing so is in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If your purpose, however, is simply to try and make the ACT look bad (even if they really have done bad things) by adding content to promote that particular viewpoint, then Wikipedia is not really the place for you. You probably should take a look at :Wikipedia:Advocacy and :Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not to make sure understand what Wikipedia's intended role is. You should also understand that article content decisions are primarily based upon a consensus achieved through discussion and anything you add can be removed if other editors feel it does not belong in the article per relevant policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

text: This article does not mention any of what you are talking about, so there is nothing to correct on that topic. Wikipedia is unlikely to report on a tw-year bond, unless it was for a famous person. It would not be suitable to mention one case like that in the article about the police that may have arrested a person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs to be reviewed as it promotes an image of an organisation that is false 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on ACT Policing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205211945/http://www.afp.gov.au/media-centre/publications/platypus/previous-editions/1999/october-1999/murder.aspx to http://www.afp.gov.au/media-centre/publications/platypus/previous-editions/1999/october-1999/murder.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110221152127/http://www.police.act.gov.au/~/media/act/PDF/act-policing-annual-report-2008-09.ashx to http://www.police.act.gov.au/~/media/act/pdf/act-policing-annual-report-2008-09.ashx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afp.gov.au/media_releases/national/2007/act_chief_police_officer_found_deceased
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified