Talk:Moskva (river)

message: 'Moskva River' is more accurate to the Russian name, but I suggest removing the redirect from 'Moscow River' as it is commonly used in English and therefore should be corrected to meet Wikipedia's guidelines for place names Wikipedia:Proper_names#Place_names. Maiya 15:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the point of removing the redirect?.. We don't want to have a duplicate article. Or did you mean to have 'Moskva River' redirect to 'Moscow River'? Why? I don't see how "Moskva River" does not meet the guideline you're referring to, both names are commonly used in English Azov 17:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moskva River v Moscow River

message: The map is not correct: the Moskva flows into the Oka above Ryazan, not below it. Please fix the problem. --Ghirla -трёп- 05:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get to it soon, looking at an Atlas it's pretty clear - I've never had the USGS data be that spectacularly wrong before Kmusser 17:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Fixed. Kmusser 14:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: "Moskva and Moscow are two different renderings of the same Russian word Москва. The city is named after the river." - it's rather not true - The river name was Moskъva(> rus. Moskva) and the city name was Moskъvъ [gordъ] (> rus. Moskov [grad or gorod]) which is adjective form from the river name ("the stronghold, city near Moskva river"). In later times both names were unifided but in OldRussian text city was called Moskov and the river Moskva...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.244.139.49 (talk) 12:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I'm not an expert in English, however, I tend to think that the correct name should be "River Moscow" (like River Thames etc). Both "Moskva River" and "Moscow River" seem to be some sort of rendering of the widespread dialectism "Москва-река" while the official name is "река Москва", the latter literally meaning "River Moscow". 178.177.21.234 (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The wrong name 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bereschkowskaja.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Moskva River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726082812/http://www.gudok.ru/transport/vodniy/news.php?ID=332409 to http://www.gudok.ru/transport/vodniy/news.php?ID=332409
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: the links in the "see also" section seem totally random???
188.123.245.159 (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: They certainly do, I'll blow that away, other editors feel free to re-create with links that actually have some connection.  Kmusser (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  see also