Talk:Blue, Green, and Waterfront Lines (Cleveland)

message: It doesn't make any sense to me to use this title if that's not the current name of the lines.  I can see the logic of combining both into a single article, I suppose, though perhaps  it would make more sense to either put all the RTA light rail into one article (i.e. integrate the Waterfront Line material here) or separate the blue and green lines into different articles. --Jfruh 03:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, I'm thinking that I'm going to do what I've said above, since nobody seems to object.  My proposal is to merge together this page and material on the Waterfront Line page into a signle page called "Blue and Green Lines (Cleveland)".  I'll do this sometime next week if nobody objects. --Jfruh (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, the only problem with that is that it wouldn't be in parrallel with the naming of the Red Line (Cleveland) page.  NYC  railfans tend to make a distinction between services (which are the named routes that trains take) and lines (which are physical pieces of trains infrastructure).  Thus, the Blue and Green Lines in Cleveland are services, part of whose route covers the Waterfront Line, which is a line, if that makes sense.  Obviously the Waterfront Line should be given prominent attention and named as such in any combined article, but it makes sense to me name them by their services.  Either that or rename the Red Line page "Heavy Rail, Cleveland" or some such. --Jfruh (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, the term Shaker Heights Rapid Transit denotes the archaic name of the line pre-GCRTA taking it over. This should be renamed into an article for the Blue, Green, and Waterfront Line just to clarify it for people who were not around during the time of pre-GCRTA. Cwmtos 12:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody seems to object, I'm going to make this move. --Jfruh (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title?

message: The image :Image:GCRTA.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:GCRTA.svg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Blue and Green Lines (Cleveland). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.riderta.com/newsroom/releases/?listingid=1651
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Blue and Green Lines (Cleveland). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916114140/http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/Research/ord0316.pdf to http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/research/ord0316.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090712063234/http://www.newsnet5.com:80/news/20010126/detail.html to http://www.newsnet5.com/news/20010126/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified