Talk:Bollocks

message: It's seems likely that bollocks in the sense of talking rubbish or nonsense derives from or is related to the term Hyperbole, Hyperbolics, Hyperbolical which means to make a point by gross exaggeration. You can easily replace the word bollocks with hyperbolics in any phrase or sentence without loosing it's meaning. I haven't found a reference yet but so won't amend the article but will keep looking until I find a reliable source, unless I'm talking bollox?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.186.46 (talk) 17:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperbole

message: So what does "Never mind the bollocks" mean? Thanks, I'm italian. Marco 15 Feb 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.40.128.238 (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered here (first pars). Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex Pistols

message: Move to Wiktionary.org, or is there even enough here? Jwrosenzweig 19:34, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary?

message: I do distinctly remember "bollocks" being shouted by a small group of people at Isle of Wight 69 and by practically everyone at IOW 70, at one point or another. I saw this the other day but now it's been deleted - why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.127.155 (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Earliest usage as festival meme

message: There is so much inaccuracy in the bollocks page. A lot of the sample phrases read like hooray henries trying to put on working class speech and failing.
I have two points regarding this:
A) that is Wikipedia for you, it's very nature is the pedantic bourgeois, not the working man, and thus those editing this article will be out of touch with genuine use
B) does the posh boy rebels getting it wrong not add to the allure of this article? It is very much correct that the majority of this article is, as titled bollocks and unencyclopædic, however don't fix what ain't broke. It is rather entertaining watching a red old man desperately try to look rebellious and fail miserably Mr anonymous username (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracy

message: Regarding the "Alternative Spelling" paragraph it is bollocks to assume that people who use the word "bollix" are bollixes who do not understand the meaning of bollocks. Finally, a term of Irish origin is "me bollix" as said by Brad Pitt's character "Mickey", the gypo, in the movie "Snatch". It is used when some bollix states something that you think is total bollocks. To this statement you reply "Ah me bollix!!!"    Squawk1er 20:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about "Yer ballax", as in "You're talking shite".Jonathan3 22:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative spellings

message: This entry really is the canines gonads. It is such a relief to read this after dealing with wiki inventions such as 'disambiguificationisation page'
when this page gets relegated elsewhere by some stiff necked US neocon then I will know that wiki has finaly got its pedia stuck up its jacksy.
Hear, hear. It is informative and funny, and all the more brilliant for being unexpectedly so. TobyJ 15:21, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  lovely page 

message: Perhaps this page is intended to be more of a humorous thing than a serious article, but shouldn't sentences like "An excellent ska band from Atlanta, Georgia uses the Dog's Bollocks as a name for their band" be revised [or, in the case of this particular sentence, perhaps completely removed] to be more objective? --PryItOpen 22:47, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  objectivity? 

message: According to QI this term came about from "Box Deluxe", with "Box Standard" converting to "Bog Standard".  violet/riga (t) 11:04, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If I may, that sounds like bollocks. -- ALoan (Talk) 20:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: QI is hardly an authoritative source. To quote from the QI article: "Most of the questions are extremely obscure, making it unlikely that the correct answer will be given. To compensate, points are awarded not only for right answers, but also for interesting ones, regardless of whether they are right or even relate to the original question."  Anyhow I had a whole series of Meccano sets all the way through to No.9 in the 1950's, and never came across any such thing as Box Standard or Box Deluxe.96.54.53.165 (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog's Bollox 

message: I see this article has been tagged as needing a cleanup. I think it is one of the best I have found on Wikipedia and am at a loss to see what needs cleaning up. Bluewave 18:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just removed the cleanup tag. The article has had a lot of work done on it since the tag was added (Oct 05). Any objections? Bluewave 08:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup? Surely not!

message: I offer the following critique of the euphemisms section. I am tempted to delete large parts of it but wanted to get other opinions first:
Balderdash: I don't think it belongs here. It is a great word in its own right, but it is not a euphemism for bollocks. It has no anatomical connotations; it can only be substituted for one very specific use of bollocks; when someone says "balderdash" it doesn't sound like they really meant "bollocks".
Horlicks: This is genuinely a euphemism and certainly deserves a place in the article. I have also heard words like "Hollyhocks" but can't cite an exact source (Ronnie Barker possibly?)
Nadgers: Another great word and it does have anatomical connotations but, again, its not really a euphemism for bollocks: it's just an alternative, milder, word for testicles. Also I'm not sure how widely it is used, apart from Rambling Syd.
:Perhaps not strictly a euphemism but I think it deserves a mention if only for the phrase 'the badger's nadgers', which is clearly based on 'the dog's bollocks'. Bombot 00:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Badger's nadgers" is certainly a well-known bollocks euphemism, might it be worth adding "mutt's nuts" or "poodle's plums" aswell? as for "B6s", I've never heard that and my gut feel is that it's made up. There's always a temptation on a page called bollocks to fill it with the same.
B6s is certainly used in internal emails in the (German) company I work for, obviously mainly by the British ex-pats.--Xollob 21:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Euphemisms

message: Am I alone in remembering this? Ben-w 12:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bollocks: They Make a Lovely Stew

message: As a descriptive synonym for a "lesser of two evils" type situation, as in "It beats a boot up the bollocks." -- to which phrase may be added: "--although not by much." I heard a "clean" variant on this one the other day: "It beats a toe in the ovals."  --Grundlepod 18:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another usage:  

message: Somewhere in the archives of the Wikipedia:Reference Desk there is a discussion about the use of the word by Wilma and John Wayne. It appears that a form of the word (sounding more like "Bollixed") was in use in the USA at some point, meaning messed-up, havn't been able to dig this out. Jooler 18:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wilma Flintstone]] and [[John Wayne]]

message: The article doesn't make sense to me . . . "bollock" used as an adjective to mean both good quality and poor quality?  It's not logically possible.  Chailai 14:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The distinction is really very clear. Let's say, for example, you go to the theatre and afterwards a friend asks you what the play was like. "It was bollocks" indicates that you didn't like it. "It was the bollocks" shows that you enjoyed it very much. The key is the insertion of the definite article, "the". It's fair to say that you hear the former construction more than the latter in the UK, but both are common.Bedesboy 18:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone please rewrite this 

message: This article includes a wealth of nuances of meaning - even to the point that some people don't believe that it is true (see above). I think it would make it more encyclopedic if we could find references that included actual usage, rather than some of the sometimes contrived examples in the text. I'll certainly look out for sightings of bollock usage in books etc. Bluewave 17:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References/citations

message: This is quite the most brilliant entry on Wikipedia!! To have achieved what so many try and fail.... and that is to get an amusing, informative and slightly tongue in cheek article in under the radar of the faceless Wikipedia Gestapo - seemingly most based in the US - who seem to think "Encyclopedic" means little more than Pedantic, Self-serving and Humourless is very refreshing indeed. Peterkirchem 17:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brilliant

message: how about: "putting one's bollocks on the anvil" to denote taking a big gamble on a forthcoming event: "I know I'm putting my bollocks on the anvil here..." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.156.187.113 (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  could we have another entry? 

message: You know... the one about never letting them dangle in the dust? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Poglad (talk • contribs) 13:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Lobster song? 

message: Someone has added a few phrases to the introduction, referring to "bullshit" and "the shit", apparently to help "Americans trying to figure out what it means". A few problems with this: firstly "the shit" is a redlink so is probably less helpful than simply reading the "bollocks" article. Secondly, the sentence implies that "bullshit", like "bollocks", can be used in a number of ways including to mean "top quality" or "perfection" (which I don't think is true). Thirdly, it does not do justice to the perceived severity of "bollocks" (number 8 in the survey referred to in the article) compared with "shit" (number 17 in the same survey). The article already references "bullshit" when decribing the negative uses of "bollocks" so I suggest we don't need it in the intro. Bluewave 09:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Similarity to bullshit

message: We should push the envelope of this paradigm and include Management bollocks. There's even a Little Book of Management Bollocks. Totnesmartin 22:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Management bollocks 

message: This is well written and nicely captures British/Irish/Australian/etc humour. Let's not be too serious. --Kjb 23:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing the point? 

message: You have to laugh at most of the above discussions about "bollcocks".  If you all have not noticed I don't think this page is too serious and does not require in-depth discussions about the word, if it should be here, usage....... yawn Linux is god (talk) 13:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a serious page 

message: Would the word bollocks be censored on American television?  --Son (talk) 02:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Censorship 

message: A template has been added suggesting that the tone of the article is inappropriate. Although there are certainly improvements that could be made to the article, and sections that could probably be deleted (what have nadgers got to do with bollocks, for instance?), I can't immediately see what's wrong with the tone. Any suggestions for the kind of thing that needs re-toning? Bluewave (talk) 14:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The tone of most of the article is too informal. And it seems to consist largely of examples of speech. Lurker (said · done) 18:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a lot of examples of speech but I think that is reasonable. The word has many shades of meaning (some contradictory) and I think that examples from literature and the media are the best way of providing citations for those meanings. I, for one, have certainly provided quite a few of those citable quotations, with the belief that these were making the article more encyclopaedic. Bluewave (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm right with you, Bluewave. I regularly cite this article to sceptical academic colleagues as evidence that Wikipedia has real value. They are invariably impressed, and at least one crusty old English professor of my acquaintance has described it as "outstandingly good". Lurker, if by "informal" you mean "readable and witty" you should get over yourself. The humour doesn't get in the way of any of the scrupulously referenced information. If only more of WP were this good. Bedesboy (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good on you, Bedesboy, you big bollocks. If he doesn't like it, Lurker can stick it up his bollocks. Besides, anyone who highlights their name immediately arouses my suspicions. --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 18:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone?

message: I have removed the following short paragraph from the opening:
:examples of its usage in this context can be found on the website [hhtp://www.bollocks.com.au bollocks.com.au]. Here, phrases such as "Whaling For Research? Bollocks" express the global belief that the 'scientific' reasoning given by Japanese whalers in defence of their whaling activities is, in fact, nonsense. Similarly, the phrase "Scientology? Bollocks" illustrates the commonly-held view of this pseudo-religion.
I'm not sure what other people think but it just seem too much like a neologistic form of usage. BpEps - t@lk 06:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bollocks.com.au 

message: The intro suggests that "bollocks" can mean "top quality" or "perfection". Can it? How? The word "bollocks" either refers to testicles or means a mess, botch, muddle, nonsense, etc. All negative. The only exception I'm aware of is "the dog's bollocks" (an idiomatic extension of the literal "testicles" meaning), and possibly one or two very specific elliptic uses of the same (e.g., "wow, that's the bollocks, that is!"). Apart from "the dog's bollocks", and possibly "the bollocks", how else can this word mean "top quality" or "perfection"? Mooncow (talk) 03:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and "top bollock", as described in section 5. However, "the dog's bollocks", "the bollocks" and "top bollock" are very specific usages with very specific meanings. To indicate in the introduction that "bollocks" might mean "top quality" or "perfection" seems to me to be quite misleading, no? Mooncow (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello, Mooncow. Your talk page indicates that you hail from Yorkshire. In order to establish the frequency of the particular locution you mention in common discourse, I suggest that you conduct an experiment. The next time you're back in God's Own Country, take yourself to a pub and buy a pint. When someone asks you if it's OK, reply thus: "bai 'eck, lad/lass, tha' Old Peculier is the best any bugger'll get this side o' Pontefract. It's top bollock, or my name's not Eli Heptonthwaite!" Your interlocutor will understand you perfectly.Bedesboy (talk) 19:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're more likely to get a punch in the gob if you try that. However, the use of top bollock you describe is perfectly correct, and I did not object to this. My point is that it is only *very specific idioms* containing 'bollock' or 'bollocks' that mean goodness, and to suggest that 'bollocks' in general can mean goodness is misleading. I adjusted the intro to make this clear, and am quite content with it now. Ta. Mooncow (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  And splendidly done, too - that reads very well now. By the way, I'm from Lincolnshire, and I'm trying to remember the last time a Yorkshireman punched a Yellowbelly in the gob and got away with it. Sometime during the Pilgrimage of Grace, I expect. Or the first siege of Hull, at the latest.Bedesboy (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfection? 

message: An anonymous user has added a cleanup-rewrite tag to this page, apparently without any additional comments here on the discussion page explaining what is wrong with the page. What needs rewriting and why? What is thought to be below standard about this article? Mooncow (talk) 16:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up? 

message: till I read this article I always assumed that "bollocks" was used to mean "oh shit!" (or a swearing version of "oh well"), instead of as an equivalent of "bullshit!", was I wrong all this time or this is another meaning? and I can't remember who, but there was a famous character that commonly said "balls" in this same sense,  so balls can also means "oh crap!", or is it only a replacement for "bullshit"? --TiagoTiago (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bullshit!" instead or besides "oh shit!" ? 

message: In 1976, AC/DC recorded and released a song called "big balls", in which the band chants: "bollocks, knackers".  The song was released on their "dirty deeds done dirt cheap" album, which sold many more copies than anything the sex pistols ever released.  In fact, thats the only reason I looked up this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Livewire1012 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your welcome to add one if you think it is notable and verifiable.  I doubt it sold more than Anarchy in the UK or God Save the Queen, mind, as I've never heard of it.  Jubilee♫clipman 01:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is there no reference to AC/DC? 

message: The information contained in the "As an obscenity" section is relevant to the article: however, the title of the section is inaccurate. Although the word is essentially course slang, it was actually ruled by the court in the Virgin / Sex Pistols / John Mortimer case not to be obscene.
Whether something is obscene or not is often subjective. For example, a billionaire may spend £20m a yacht: he may see this as the fulfillment of some kind of ambition, but others may see this kind of spending as "obscene". A trainee surgeon may have to encounter photos of a naked corpse as part of some kind of medical training: the same photos may be considered "obscene" if broadcast on the nightly news. If it was unclear at the time of the case whether the word "bollocks" was obscene or not, this clearly illustrates that 
the word is what one would consider to be mild (but still course) slang, or a mild "swear-word". It is not a vulgar word, according to the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. So sometimes when there is a word that is on the apparent cusp between being "officially" (by the Police / Obscene Publications Acts) classed or considered vulgar or obscene, it requires a test case in the courts to decide this. Well there was a case (the one mentioned above with John Mortimer as defence counsel), and the court ruled that the word was not obscene. Therefore the section could perhaps be alternatively titled
"Obscenity" court ruling. And the sentence that reads:
Testimony in a resulting prosecution over the "obscene" term demonstrated that in Old English, the word referred to a priest, and could also be used to mean "nonsense" 
could be changed (by removing the word "obscene") to: 
Testimony in a resulting prosecution over the term demonstrated that in Old English, the word referred to a priest, and could also be used to mean "nonsense". The court ruled that the word was not obscene.
In regard to the Leicestershire trader Tony Wright, he should have challenged the fine, as there's obviously been a test case, and legal precedent has been set. Perhaps he did, but this is irrelevant: the fact is the word is not obscene. In an encyclopedia article on a word like this, this should be made clear. Subsequently have made some small changes to the section.
86.177.176.12 (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit the article then! But I think you mean 'coarse'.   pablohablo. 01:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said in conclusion, I have done. However, I stand corrected on my spelling. Lucky it's just the talk page, eh? 86.177.176.12 (talk) 02:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can argue that, because of the court case, it's "officially" not an obscenity. However, it is still quite an offensive word to many people. In terms of severity, it was ranked (10 years ago) between "prick" and "arsehole" and considered unsuitable for broadcasting before the watershed, so I think the evidence is rather against your assertion that it is "mild". Arguably, the Tony Wright case has also set a legal precedent, also. Bluewave (talk) 16:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no real court case with Tony Wright, so no legal precedent or "recorded case". Offensive to many people - yes, but not an obscenity. That survey 10 years ago sounds hilarious - would love to see it....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.188.163 (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, personally, I find any "serious" discussion of obscenities and offensive words to be hilarious...but then I've probably got a very childish sense of humour. The link to the report doesn't seem to work any more but I think this cached version  still works at the moment. Bluewave (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Read it and loved "perceived severity" graph and "top three" swear words chart (down two places this week etc.) . Also have childish sense of humour. 86.180.43.233 (talk) 23:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "As an obscenity" section 

message: According to this article, "ballbag" was popularised by Russell Brand? That's definitely bollocks. Search Youtube for Chewin' The Fat (a brilliant Scottish comedy which was around well before Brand started on Big Brother) and you'll find loads of clips (particularly of "The Big Man") that involve one person calling another person a "bawbag". --81.154.108.47 (talk) 07:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Concise Scots Dictionary dates ba'/baw/bawcod to the 15th/16th centuries. "Bawbag" was already in use in some programmes on Scottish radio and television before Chewin the Fat. Perhaps a student of modern Scottish literature or films might be able to begin a backward trail of usage ?
--MBRZ48 (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russell Brand? 

message: Somebody (unregistered) added a deletion template with no explanation beyond stating that the article is unencyclopedic. I have similarly deleted the template on the basis that the article is encyclopaedic. I suggest that any further proposals for deletion should involve some debate. Bluewave (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion template

message: The article recently survived a nomination for deletion. There was a general view that it needs improving. My suggestions are as follows:
*Over time, the article has suffered a sort of "content creep", where people have added their own favourite usages, in the wrong place, and without noticing that their usage already has a section describing it.
*Some of the etymology looks a bit dubious and needs checking, and referencing.
*There's a lot of stuff such as alternative words for testicles and other interesting expletives that has nothing to do with the article and really should be removed. Examples are ball-bag and balderdash, neither of which are directly relevant.
*Usages should be illustrated with examples taken from printed sources, not ones made up by editors (currently there are some of each).
*Perhaps it's worth grouping together the stuff about perceived severity with the court cases and give more of a historical perspective on how the perceived severity has changed over time.
*In the AfD discussion, Eebahgum talked about some sociological aspects of the word and the way it "establishes a kind of informal freemasonry or subculture of the heartier types across all classes". This would certainly be worth expanding if we can find any sources.
Well, the above is a start. Do people agreee, or have other views? Bluewave (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst looking around for sources, I came upon a book called President George W. Bush's Greatest Achievements by someone supposedly called Seymour Bollocks. It was published by eReads.com, 2009 (, 9780759244696). It actually consists of 144 pages which are completely blank. I dunno if it's worth a mention. Bluewave (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: When someone is hammering above you’re bedroom at 12am you tell them it all the noise it doesn’t sink in.
They reply it does sink in.
BOLLOCKS DOES IT! STOP HAMMERING ABOVE MY BEDROOM AT 12am!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JBListening (talk • contribs) 18:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOLLOCKS DOES IT!  

message: LOL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JBListening (talk • contribs) 18:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IT’S THE CATS BOLLOOCKS!  

message: Reference for bollocks in the Domesday Book, 1086:
Humphrey Golden Bollocks: Tenant-in-chief,
Plesingho, Dunmow, Essex.
http://domesdaymap.co.uk/name/299750/humphrey-goldenbollocks/
alternatively:
http://www.domesdaybook.co.uk/essex4.html
Just saying. 
Jazzlord  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.147.204 (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bollocks in the Domesday Book 

message: I don't think it is necessary to suggest that "rollock" might refer to some kind of sliding knife. It is more likely an alternative spelling of "rowlock," the part of a boat in which an oar is locked so that it hinges when you are rowing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.163.124 (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowlock, Rollock 

message: The term Dropping a Bollock can also refer to getting a Scrotal Hernia. Brian.L.Myers (talk) 23:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to which reliable source? Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dropping a Bollock / Hernia 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bollocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100314131854/http://www.asa.org.uk:80/Resource-Centre/Reports-and-surveys.aspx to http://www.asa.org.uk/Resource-Centre/Reports-and-surveys.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What happened to mi records after they swindled the sex pistols 118.149.75.55 (talk) 06:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emi record swindled the sex pistols what happened