lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sick Building Syndrome

message: "Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) is a medical phenomenon whereby the occupants of a building develop acute health" -- is this correct?  Aren't conditions more likely to be chronic than acute? Or is "acute" being used in its colloquial sense of "serious" - probably not suited to a medical article? Notinasnaid 10:01, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: Sick Building Syndrome – Sick building syndrome
To be consistent with the use of lowercase letters in titles
*Support. violet/riga (t) 19:52, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. violet/riga (t) 20:42, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Draft (nautical)

message: I believe this is one of those 'drafts' that is normally spelt 'draught' in British English. Shouldn't this be indicated?
I have re-worked the Hull (watercraft) article to cover off and collect a number of hullform related stubs.
Jmvolc 19:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

message: :This article keeps getting put up for speedy deletion as there are no links coming in to it, which is patently false as there are plenty of links in *other* wikipedias coming to this Draft (nautical). Please fix those iw links. -Yupik 15:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki links to this page
Talk:International Bank Account Number

message: How do I make a payment on someone else’s account and I have all the information 162.213.23.97 (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I make a payment on someone else’s account I have all the information 

message: S 103.7.79.54 (talk) 01:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urdu English 

message: wrong France calculation:
Each of them is then multiplied by the proper multiplier (87, 15, 3) respectively.
Should be:
Each of them is then multiplied by the proper multiplier (89, 15, 3) respectively.
(take any frenck account number given in the web and the typo is obvious).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:A2A7:D800:D68:2DC8:FED:E652 (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  National check digits 

message: Under Adoption there is a world map. On that map, Portugal is depicted in a weird way. Does anyone know the reason or can someone fix that? Lagustus (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Map (Portugal) 

message: Falkland  Islands (the), FKnn aann nnnn nnnn nn
Mongolia,MNnn nnnn nnnn nnnn nnnn
Nicaragua, NInn aaaa nnnn nnnn nnnn nnnn nnnn nnnn (Nicaragua was on aspirational list)
Oman, OMnn nnnc cccc cccc cccc ccc
Somalia, SOnn nnnn nnnn nnnn nnnn nnn
Source: International Bank Account Number (IBAN) | Swift; IBAN Registry Hbeslija (talk) 08:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing from the list
Talk:Refectory

message: This page can certainly be made encyclopedic, but I am not qualified to do it. I have categorised it to Architecture.Philip 11:13, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does the External links section link to pages for actual refectories at various institutions? These don't add any information; they seem to be there just to prove that there really are refectories out there! MFNickster 17:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable external links 

message: Why is the picture on its side? 80.98.146.68 (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture on its side 

message: The term refectory is currently used by many British Universities for their student cafeterias. This article should note that. Bleaney (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refectory as a university cafeteria 
Talk:Pit fired pottery

message: Hi everyone. I have some doubts abot this "Other traditional pottery processes which have been revived or modified by modern potters include the Asian technique of raku, the use of containers known as saggars in gas and wood fired kilns, and the use of salt as a glaze raw material." The reaons:
*Why include it as the article is not about saggar firing, raku or salt firing.
*It suggests that saggar firing had stopped, and has been reinstated.
ThanxTheriac 08:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it puts this firing method in a family of pottery techniques that have been revived or modified as visual art techniques during the late 20th century.  Please note the or.  Saggars have continued in their traditional use, but have recently been modified or adapted for use in the visual arts.  But...... we could simply put links in "See also" if you think that would be better.  WBardwin 22:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saggar

message: :"horse hair pit" or "horsehair pit" zero results.
:"horse hair raku" or "horsehair raku" about 729 results
I think this is as close to definitive as these things get. Please remove Horse Hair from the Pit Fired Pottery pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.108.188.134 (talk) 23:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A quick Google search for References 

message: I have recently added some references for both pit firing and horse hair: these were needed. Nevertheless I note that the section on horse hair should either be transferred to the raku article or spun off to its own dedicated article. I would also note major reservation about the claim  re. the Pueblo tribes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.238.178 (talk) 02:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Any comments about transferring the horse hair section to raku? This seems a more appropriate place, and clearly the are others who concur.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.238.178 (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse hair 

message: The Horse hair raku article is now fleshed out and vetted. I've removed that content from this article and added a See Also in case the original content's creator objects.    We can remove the See All if we have a consensus. Agmiller (talk) 21:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved/Removed [[Horse hair raku]] content 

message: I also have a problem with WB's re-removing content about bisqued ware in Pit Fired Pottery.  If there is to be a section on modern Pit Fired Pottery, it should be noted that most modern artists pre-bisque their ware before Pit Firing it, greatly reducing pit firing failures with raw ware.
:I concur and think we'll probably need to separate the Traditional and Modern Usage descriptions to avoid confusion. Traditional usage would not include metal salts and oxides. It should also probably be noted that modern "pits" are often above ground bonfires, wind breaks, or even barrels. Usage of dung as a primary combustible should also be noted. Agmiller (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bisqued Ware
Talk:Saggar

message: Hi WBardwin, everyone. The article would benefit from a reword of the following "The revival and alteration of saggar firing methods by modern artists" as revival suggests that saggar firing had stopped. But given the paragraph above it I suggest the last sentence of the article be removed, and maybe replaced by "See also" with appopraite internal links. ThanxTheriac 18:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-word

message: To end the anonymous slow edit war, I'm semiprotecting the article. It is no longer possible to edit the article anonymously. If you create an account and edit as one person, 217.44.222.235 etc, etc, you will be able to edit the article after 4 days. bishzilla ROARR!! 09:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semiprotecting

message: Ok, there have been some external sources wondering why saggar fired pottery needs protection... I'm not quite sure myself what makes this topic so highly controversial, just thought I'd give a heads up. Lampman (talk) 23:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridicule 

message: Ahem... perhaps infinite semi-protection was a bit steep. The protection was performed by my pet monster, User:Bishzilla, who does get a little ... over-enthusiastic sometimes. To general relief, she's not an administrator any more, and I am herewith unprotecting the pottery. Let me know if there are any further dynamic IP problems, and my cabal will take care of them. Bishonen | talk 13:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotecting

message: Here:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casette  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.192.34.23 (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs to be linked to the french version of this article
Talk:United Nations resolution

message: GA resolutions are definitely nonbinding. Perhaps your article could include a discussion of the binding triad, though. Thc420 07:19, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: GA resolutions

message: Could anyone please clarify the copyright status of United Nations resolutions for use in Wikipedia or Wikisource? I hope to know it better before adding more UN resolution documents. Thanks.--Jusjih 06:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction, a major discovery at s:Wikisource:Possible_copyright_violations#Draft_United_Nations_Guiding_principles_on_Human_Rights_and_Extreme_Poverty has found that paragraph 2 of ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 leaves United Nations resolutions in the public domain, so we may add them to Wikisource, but Wikipedia should be used to write about them instead of just copying their contents. Very sorry about the major turmoil at English Wikisource for months.--Jusjih 17:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status of United Nations resolutions 

message: Hey,  
We're starting a small wiki dedicated to Foreign Policy and UN Research.  We're pretty new at the whole wiki thing, but you seem to have made some solid foreign policy posts.  We'd love your expertise if you've got the time to possibly answer some questions and contribute.  Interested?  Email Admin.MUNFO@gmail.com and check out http://www.munfo.com (very early in development ;)) Fj winit
:Please see Wikipedia:Spam. Thank you. Skinnyweed 22:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One 

message: is there any expiration date for a resolution? As I know the UN has passed many resolution for anti-blasphemy or to "against religious defamation", if there is no expiration date, then why does OIC want to raise it every year? http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/263450/anti-blasphemy-measure-laid-rest-nina-shea Jackzhp (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: effective term

message: There is a split discussion in progress on Talk:List of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine, which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  GreyShark (dibra) 19:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Split discussion in progress
Talk:Atreidae

message: I made this from a myth stub to a disambig. Not entirely sure if Atreidae can be associated with House Atreides however. Feel free to revert me. Inter 13:40, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: Since all this information exists on Atreus already, I'm going to merge this article into it, making this article a redirect to Atreus. Any objections? -kotra (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, looking through the edit history now I see that it used to be a redirect, and an anonymous editor had expanded it into a stub. Instead of going through the merge process, I have just reverted their edits. -kotra (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 27, 2005

message: As I pointed out on the Talk:Robert Walpole page, Walpole was not a member of the Whig Party. There was no Whig Party. Walpole was a Whig, which means he shared his political views with other Whigs, but there was no party structure, there was no party leader, there was no party whip, there was no party office, there was no party workers, there was no party. Can someone please change this. Jooler 13:45, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Daihatsu Rocky (F300)

message: 1984: Rugger goes on sale! in Europe as "Rocky" named
1990: "Rocky" goes on sale ! in europe as Feroza.
look:http://www.daihatsu.com/company/outline/history/1980s.html
--84.139.87.33 (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  not 1984 !!! =

message: As I seem to recall, Daihatu's advertising for their vehicles in the United States was very Japanese market oriented, and then translated into English.  The result was something that didn't entice anyone, it instead sounded very much like a warning label on a product.  The tagline was something like "The Rocky, by DIAHATSU; the most respected name in Japanese automobiles for (insert number of years)."  Considering that most Americans had never heard of Diahatsu, I think they found the claim a bit hard to swallow. user: stude62 user talk:stude62 13:59, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Daihatsu Rocky

message: I read somewhere (Believe it was a UK source) that this was an alternate model name. Was I misled? --Jnelson09 21:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourtrak? 

message: The car depicted as a first generation Rocky is actually a second generation one. First generation daihatsu rockys looked like the first mitsubishi pajeros, only smaller. Southwestsoul (talk) 16:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First generation? 

message: The reusage of nameplates had been common in the automotive industry lately. Most cars would just split it from the old one if it's different enough, for example Chevrolet Trailblazer (crossover), MG ZS (crossover) or Suzuki Baleno (2015). As the first-gen and the second-gen Rocky are very different, should we split this one? Andra Febrian (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be the same case as Honda Mobilio, which the differing generations are very different to each other, while maintaining the same article. 182.30.137.85 (talk) 03:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to split until the article becomes too large to handle. IP, I see your edits a lot (I think, it's hard to tell) and I invite you to create a username as it will make conversation easier, and it will lend more credence to your edits. Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  09:16, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's too small to slice it up. It would need a summary page, plus a page for each generation. Each would only be 1 or 2 paragraph's, making them not worth the hassle.  Stepho  talk  18:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the first and second generation?
Talk:Daihatsu Charade

message: I remember seeing some early proposed marketing material for the car when Diahatsu was coming to North America and they used the tagline "Its just not a car, its a Charade the best car ever made in the intire universe!".  They dropped the line, but insisted on the name.  user: stude62 user talk:stude62 14:03, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Its just not a car, its a Charade!

message: The information on this article is incomplete/inaccurate. The charade sold here in Chile between approx. 1977-1984 was called G20 (not G10), the first generation had round headlights, the second (1981-1984) had square headlights, both powered by an 843cc 3-cylinder engine. There also was the Runabout version, which had 3 doors and two round windows in the back. jvidal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.45.130.95 (talk) 14:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: G20 (Chile)

message: Was looking for information on whether these were front or rear wheel drive cars220.233.43.173 (talk) 06:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article doesn't say and I'm not 100% positive, but it is almost definitely front engined and front wheel drive, like almost every other small hatch back since the mid 70s.  The first generation is the only one I'm not positive about, later generations are definitely FWD. --Leivick (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: FWD?

message: The article also misses the fact that some hatches in AUS were 1.5l - I own a 1997 1.5L Hatchback - G203 Engine/badge on the car Benjsc (talk) 04:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the 1.5 is mentioned (not just Aussie, either): Daihatsu_Charade#G200  Mr.choppers | ✎  08:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing 1.5?
Talk:International Astronomical Youth Camp

message: Changed a bit to make it more clear what the IAYCs really are about. Hope this doesn't sound to much 'advertising', but... since I'm not one of the organizers, this should be unsuspicious:-). 
Can somebody find out more accurate numbers (how many different locations, how many participants in total...)? The statistics on the iayc.org side seem to be gone... --CWitte 14:27, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: about
Talk:Gyula

message: I've just read a part of Realm of St.Stephen: History of Medieval Hungary, 895-1526 which is a recent work written by a Hungarian historian for the English-speaking market (it hasn't even been published in Hungarian). This has further clarified things and in some cases confirmed what I had already read elsewhere. 
I'm going to change this from a disambiguation page, as the revised article will focus on the title/personal name Gyula. Scott Moore 16:06, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further clarification of Gyula
Talk:Gunnera

message: As you can see from the picture in the article, the unusual leaves of this plant are shaped remarkably like a man with a blue shirt, with his arm forming the stem.
:Very amusing. I am that man. I do not normally carry a gigantic ruler to show the scale of things so I used myself instead. OK?  Sorry about the silly grin, I blame my wife for taking the picture at the wrong moment - Adrian Pingstone 18:11, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, yes it's ok. I just couldn't resist the joke. It's really nice. --DanielCD 13:35, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The botanical standard is to use one's hat, while for geologists it's the rock hammer, or ice axe if at higher altitudes. Some entomologists use a shoe bottom. :-) Stan 18:02, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't wear a hat! (and no hat was available from those around me) - Adrian Pingstone 21:50, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Millennium Dome

message: Obviously nothing happend at the Dome/O2 since 2008 except the Olympics? Or nobody cares? This discussion page is 90% about renamimg, merging, splitting and moving, which is of absolutely no interest to readers, but key information is just missing. A typical case of the WP community navel-gazing - discussing unnecessary things instead of working on an encyclopedia?  47.71.2.160 (talk) 08:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the Dome as was (or should we call it "the white elephant"?). Recent events should be covered in The O2 Arena. --kingboyk (talk) 04:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article abandoned? 

message: I was hoping to 'borrow' a few citations for another article and have discovered that the referencing here is pretty awful - some poor sources, some references poorly formatted, and important parts of the story on the background and the political debate about whether it should be built and who should pay for it are missing, or present but not referenced at all. --kingboyk (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing and references are terrible
Talk:Renaissance philosophy

message: Someone tried do some mischief to the page, editing its content.
Please, don't do it here. That's a encyclopedia for all humankind.
Yes, the nasty fat hobbitses did it. Fat hobbitses, doesn't trust Gollum. Aagh! Bad Dobby, bad Dobby!
:Are you sure? Narssarssuaq (talk) 01:14, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some mischief 

message: ...is pretty sad considering its importance and the fact that it's on a navigational template. Seems like most of what it says is about defining the Renaissance and not about philosophy at all. Someday I would like to work on this article. Is there anyone who's attached to the text as it is? Maestlin 18:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article
Talk:Light pollution

message: Here's a list of possible things that the article might benefit from, in no particular order:
1. Remove the liberal bias from the article. Oh wait, you wouldn't have an article without that...
:Reality has a liberal bias. Not necessarily for things that only affect relations between humans (whether kookoo anarchists should let legal heroin stores open in front of schools or not, is Hamas evil..) but definitely for environmental things. The conservative track record is very bad on that. And don't say liberal is tree hugging people that want no wood to be used ever and think the tree's spirit speaks to them, the average liberal's nothing like that.
Feel welcome to edit the list, of course.  Izogi 23:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To-do list

message: What light pollution causes
 
 pollution causes 103.203.230.25 (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: — Assignment last updated by Tshaible (talk) 18:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Urban Pollution and Remediation
Talk:Jared Taylor

message: Remove white supremacist from the inlead and elsewhere in the writing. To suggest this is to state clearly that Wikipedia is biased against someone that writes and forestands European Worths and Folk's, not someone that thinks whitefolk are racially above everyone else and should govern as such! 95.129.31.2 (talk) 07:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: see above Cannolis (talk) 07:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 September 2023 

message: in the antisemitism section david duke is identified as 'an antisemitic conspiracy theorist' but he's far better known as the former grand wizard of the KKK. surely that should be what he's referred to as? Minty420 (talk) 13:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see how they are not synonymous. Slatersteven (talk) 13:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I kind of agree. I think of David Duke and I think of two things: former KKK guy and his run for governor in Louisiana (in '92 IIRC). Of course, one of the challenges of editing here is saying for sure what a guy/gal is best known for (unless there is RS specifically saying it).Rja13ww33 (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Duke reference
Talk:List of subcamps of Auschwitz

message: what are the religons of the subcamps of Auschwitz? 
what is each one backround infomation?
::What? Why would a concentration camp have a religion...? Anyways, why not visit the individual pages to find that out? This is a list, not an encyclopedia page in itself.--173.73.137.33 (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Someone does not dare to ask straight out. Auschwitz is known for the Holocaust, so the question if the subcamps were full of Jews is probably justified. I do not think so because the need for workers was serious. I met a formerly Latvian woman in Australia who was adamant that many volunteered because there were no jobs in the Baltic countries. I confronted her several times, because in Germany where I grew up nobody ever mentioned that. Maybe she was the only one? The German wikipedia mentions that there existed a subcamp in the German town of Plauen where I happened to be born. My late father managed the factory where they were working. I think that the German mentioning, i.e. that the facility in Plauen was attached to Auschwitz, would not be right as distance and terrain do not suggest connection.  2001:8003:A02F:F400:9013:77C0:56A8:94A9 (talk) 23:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: The USHMM encyclopedia gives the location of Budy as Bór. Any thoughts? Seraphim System (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budy 

message: Hi , would you move this back, please, to List of subcamps of Auschwitz? If it won't allow a revert because a page needs to be deleted, you can request the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Technical requests. This is a list article and should follow Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists, including WP:LISTNAME. A page move would need an WP:RM. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and requested the move back to the list name. SarahSV (talk) 01:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move