lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:5th Signal Command (United States)

message: The subject of this article edits under an IP address,  ~Kylu (u|t)  04:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User page for article subject 
Talk:Holden Commodore (VL)

message: I am concerned that some passages in this article look like they were directly copied from here. There probably are some copyright issues with this and is best if it was changed. VectorD 04:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: Noticing a large section on specs deleted, I restored them, and along with them other content as well. Possibly this was a mistake, especially if relevant information was integrated in the article in a different place. I do appreciate the sincere concern of the contributor who raised questions regarding my optical health. Thank you, JNW 15:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: Changed "RB30DET" in the text body to "RB30E" . Because, the RB30DET is an aftermarket concoction of engine parts and was never produced from any factory. Also the RB30E was the most common engine type, with the RB30ET being somewhat uncommon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.57.87 (talk) 10:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine 
Talk:Concord Resort Hotel

message: To the person who wrote about firefighter training: If there is now 42 rooms and the golf academy, are they still doing training there? Postcard Cathy 04:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Cite news-q

message: Explanation should make clear where the name of a magazine/newspaper belongs.  For an article in Time magazine, should "work" or "publisher" be "Time"?  "Publisher" could be the name of the company which owns Time magazine, so the usage is not obvious.  (SEWilco 04:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication name 

message: As the Template:cite news has now added the quotation option that was lacking, I'm going to remove dozen or so usages of this template in articles and convert them to the standard. --LeflymanTalk 20:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged standard News citation template
Talk:Ralph Horton flying saucer crash

message: It was unidentified at the time.  There is no indication of a hoax.  But for the time being, I think it is OK to put it in the UFO-related category.  Bubba73 (talk), 16:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *i would prefer it be in the ufo-related phenomena category b/c it has been identified (IFO) so i dont think it should be classified as a "UFO" crash and i was wrong about the hoax category (sorry bout that one) (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 17:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UFO? 
Talk:Bryan Stone

message: I noticed this, and a quick google showed a few of his books for sale at Amazon.  So, while perhaps not the best known of authors, to me that's enough significance that I see no reason to think this should be deleted.  Friday (talk) 04:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh good.  I'll browse Amazon for authors with a few books and start adding them. - CobaltBlueTony 04:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, I could be wrong.  But there's some decent looking scholarly credentials plus some books.  I'm not saying there's a slam drunk case for significance, but I think it'd at least deserve a shot at afd rather than a prod or a speedy.  Friday (talk) 04:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On notability 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Osama American in Bondage

message: Osama American in Bondage is an allegorical tragedy nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in Fiction.
:This discussion has been closed.  If you think the article was deleted unfairly, take a look at Wikipedia:Deletion review.  However, your Pulitzer claim is demonstrably false, so I wouldn't go that route. -Elmer Clark 05:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Katō Hiroyuki

message: Encyclopædia Britannica gives his dates as: "born Aug. 5, 1836, Izushi, Tajima province, Japan
died Feb. 9, 1916, Tokyo". What is the source of the information in this article?
--Rbraunwa 23:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: dates have been corrected. death date was a typo. birth date was based on lunar calendar in use before start of Meiji period, and needed to be converted to Gregorian calendar.--MChew 15:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and death dates
Talk:PathPing

message: === Explanation of output ===
I'd like to request an explanation of the output of this command.  I don't really understand how packets can be lost both at nodes and over links.  Also, is it so common for 100% of packets to be lost??203.37.151.11 05:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests 

message: I'd like to request an explanation of the output of this command.  I don't really understand how packets can be lost both at nodes and over links.  Also, is it so common for 100% of packets to be lost??203.37.151.11 05:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of output 

message: The scanario is like total ICMP is blocked in site to site vpn connection becouse of security (3des) encription, so whats next step to identify any packet loss in this situation  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.100.80 (talk) 19:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any other command to find packet loss 

message: I have Windows Vista Ultimate, options -P, -R and -T area missing. Why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.52.135.46 (talk) 10:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of parameters
Talk:Liferea

message: The image is a bit not up to date, isn't it? Especially does it not show the new icon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.94.129 (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: "There are many other news readers available, but some of these are not available for Linux or require extra libraries to be installed." 
That statement needs to be reworded, or possibly even removed. It does go with what should be expected in an encylopedia. --525252a 05:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording Needed 

message: "It supports a number of different feed formats including RSS/RDF, CDF, Atom, OCS, and OPML, many of which its contemporaries cannot."
That's a pretty bold statement to make, especially without any sources to back it up, and without explaining what is to be understood by "contemporaries". Feed readers? Browsers? Email programs? Software in general? Most dedicated feed readers do support RSS/RDF, Atom, and OPML. I can imagine support for CDF or OCS is somewhat limited, but that still does not justify the "many" in "many of which" here. MichielN (talk) 21:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with other software
Talk:Langley (unit)

message: I'm OK with cm squared but what is 1 cal ??? Saga City 05:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: About 4.184 joules. Eutactic (talk) 11:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks S a g a C i t y (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't it be calories 'per minute'? --Damorbel (talk) 12:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per minute? 

message: Can the need for additional citations be removed now that a source at NIST for the definition has been given? --Wilhelm-Conrad (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs additional citations for verification
Talk:Pavel Kolchin

message: Which is the source for the current  information that Kolchin's date of death was December 30, 2010? Eurosport.ru for example (at least according to Google Translate) tells that he died Wednesday, which was December 29. Also a site called baltinfo.ru  and Eesti Suusaliit  state that his date of death was December 29, 2010. ,,n (talk) 13:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:Anything (Third Eye Blind song)

message: I once thought about creating this article, but decided against it, fearing I couldn't scrounge enough content or sources up to keep it from being deleted or merged. Here's a few sources I had a ways back, in case they're helpful on expanding or saving the article. 
# https://www.mtv.com/news/516790/third-eye-blind-debut-new-song-at-blind-date-show/ (first reveal) 
# https://www.mtv.com/news/517658/third-eye-blind-singer-calls-upcoming-sophomore-album-earthy-haunted/ (Preview description)
# http://www.mtv.com/news/519467/free-music-third-eye-blind/ (Free release)
Sergecross73 msg me 13:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Açık Radyo

message: A good deal of copy editing for style and formatting issues is neccessary. -Emiellaiendiay 05:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing needed
Talk:Washingtonville High School

message: Is it practical/necessary to list all of the school closings and/or delays on this page?
74.73.244.85 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 02:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delays/Closings?

message: I have removed the list of notable alumni per the biographies of living persons policy. It was almost entirely unsourced, and the sources that were there did not support the claim that they are alumni of Washingtonville. Kafziel Complaint Department 20:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni
Talk:Merric Boyd

message: The 1920 photograph of Merric Boyd displaying a fine example of his work was not taken as previously put as in his studio. It was in the main living room where the front curtains can be seen. A fine photograph and excellent addition to the potter's story. Laurencebeck (talk) 07:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph Merric Boyd 1920.
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Besserwisser

message: It is remarkable that Wikipedians cannot accept that Wikipedia has an article on Besserwisser. This  reveals a certain important weakness and/or limitation of the Wikipedia concept. The deletion of the article on Besserwisser shows how far the decisions about Wikipedia's contents are decided by Besserwissers. Mikaelbook 06:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/ReyBrujo

message: Some may notice this page has been deleted twice. The first time, Jedi6 nominated me after we spent quite a lot of time reverting vandalism over the Wii article. Back then, I explained in his talk page that, due lack of time and administrator-task involvement like AFD and RFA, I would be rejecting his offer. The second time, Fastnaturedude nominated me. However, I had had an inconvenient with him, in which I did not realize I was editing a prior version of his talk page, which created a bad mood during which he nominated me for adminship claiming another had done so. Everything was solved after I apologized. See the details at User talk:Fastnaturedude. -- ReyBrujo 06:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prior nomination

message: User                           	ReyBrujo
Category talk                  	4
Category                       	159
Image talk                     	137
Image                          	1369
Mainspace                      	13038
Portal talk                    	11
Portal                         	5
Talk                           	2868
Template talk                  	108
Template                       	351
User talk                      	1718
User                           	411
Wikipedia talk                 	582
Wikipedia                      	1595
avg edits per article          	2.51
earliest                       	18:16, 12 May 2005
number of unique articles 	8904
total                          	22356
ReyBrujo's edit count see (cached, live) as of 15:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit count 

message: In case anyone is wondering why I don't usually participate in requests for adminship, it is my belief that simple numbers do not really express the quality of a user, and that not only a deep check in the user edit history is needed, but also some experience dealing with the user. That is why I only participate in requests from people to whom I have known prior to the nomination, either by contributing in similar articles, or while working in similar projects. An editor review is usually easier to handle, because you only point what you think about the editor contributions in a pretty neutral way. In a request for adminship, where the user is to be given tools that are not yet available for others, such a cold review cannot take into account something very important: the situation in which his reaction was based. -- ReyBrujo 16:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests for adminship participation
Talk:Pegative case

message: very interesting. thanks for the write-up & link to the paper. peace – ishwar  (speak) 06:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cool
Talk:Jeremiah Curtin

message: I personally find this article far too damning of Curtin's translations. I have read the whole of Henryk Sienkiewicz's The Trilogy as well as Knights of the Cross and think that he captures the essence of the novels and that his use of formal, sometimes archaic expressions is appropriate for the language of the time and helps to capture the correct historical atmosphere. Ivankinsman (talk) 09:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add sources that agree with you.  Nihil novi (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  An overly critical of Curtin's translations
Talk:Smale's problems

message: There should be a table created for this article similar to one created for Hilbert's problems. Sr13 06:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article appears to have been copied verbatim from MathWorld. 68.40.190.221 06:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're right, thanks for bringing this to our attention. Since the MathWorld article has been around since 2004 and our article was only created this year, it's clear that our article was copied from MathWorld. The article is duly deleted. For further reference, the URL from which the article was copied is http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SmalesProblems.html . -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I now rewrote the article afresh. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Table

message: The 14-th problem links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_system.  That is not a problem!  Nor is the solution, a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_arithmetic, actually a solution.  The person who wrote the entry probably knows what they are writing about, but an encyclopaedia should exist to inform those who don't. 86.166.161.114 (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  14-th problem 

message: What's the status of the 8th problem? It's not clear from the text that's there. Apocheir (talk) 03:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand it either. Dintre (talk) 08:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  8th problem
Talk:Smothered/Archive 01

message: Smothered (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) → Smothered — Per WP:TV-NC.  Smothered redirects to here.
===Support===
# Support.  Requestor, per nom. --Serge 01:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: # Support.  Requestor, per nom. --Serge 01:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: # Oppose, if for no other reason than that the term "Smothered" can reasonably be assumed to later be needed for some other article, so disambiguation is appropriate. I would also point out that discussion about the issue of disambiguation is ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:Naming conventions (television), so it is premature to be engaged in page moves at this time.  Please do not be disruptive. --Elonka 01:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: Note that Scared is the article about the punk rock album of that name and that it does not redirect to Fear.  --Serge 02:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This isn't even needed. Consensus was already reached on the TV-NC talk page that the guildline should stay as "disambiguate only when needed". Now the argument is only about TV series which have exceptions. A lot of TV series which don't follow the guildline have already been moved, or are in the process of being so - and so far no evidence of the disruption or confusion that you're making a fuss about. 
What Smothered needs is a speedy tag, under the category of deleting redirect pages so proper (not cut and paste) moves can be made. --`/aksha 03:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unneeded
Talk:Holy actions

message: I added this tag because this article seems to me to have been written from an explicitly pro-Christian viewpoint, which assumes that Holy actions are self-evidently a good thing and which would therefore violate NPOV. I'm not familiar with the details of the subject matter, so can't really edit it properly myself; hopefully someone else - if they agree with my POV concern - can. Loganberry (Talk) 06:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|POV}} tag
Talk:Society for the Advancement of Judaism

message: um, Hava nagilah was composed by Abraham Tzvi Idelsohn, wasn't it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.208.141 (talk) 20:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Huldra, there were two different "Society for the Advancement of Judaism" organizations; one founded in 1912 by Magnes' supporters to provide him with a salary (after he resigned from B'nai Jesuhrun) , and another founded by Kaplan in 1922. Jayjg (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

text: User:Jayjg Thanks! (Must confess I long since had forgetting that I asked this question!) Huldra (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured you probably had, but I came across the question while I was doing some other stuff here, so I thought I'd answer. :) Jayjg (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Talk:CBS News Roundup

message: at 2:29 AM EDT, Wednesday, March 18, Meg Oliver announced that this would be her last night hosting the program. Anyone have any info on who will be her replacement? Orpheus42 (talk) 06:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meg Oliver's departure 

message: CBS News Nightwatch was a longer-form program that originally aired live for four hours. The original anchors were Harold Dow, Felicia Jeter, Karen Stone and Christopher Glenn, in New York. Charlie Rose didn't join the show until it was moved to Washington and cut back to two hours live/two hours repeated. There should probably be a separate article for Nightwatch, though I don't have time to do the research necessary to create one. JTRH (talk) 12:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not the same program as "Nightwatch" 

message: Buried in the write-up of the CBS News 24/7 expansion, CBS revealed that a late-night program called "CBS News Roundup" will be airing on television in the same slot currently occupied by Overnight. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-24-7-streaming-channel/ Trstnandrw (talk) 01:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBS News Roundup (2024)
Talk:NBC News at Sunrise

message: Article currently says that "Sunrise" began on August 8, 1983.  This start date needs to be confirmed.  My recollection is that the premiere of "Sunrise" was on August 1, 1983.  "Sunrise" did a 10th anniversary segment in the summer of 1993 -- I believe that segment said that "Sunrise" began on August 1, 1983.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jab73 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Debut of "Sunrise"?
Talk:Good Morning America Weekend Edition

message: There's even less to distinguish this from the weekday GMA show than the weekend editions of Today has to distinguish it from its mothership, and having them all on one artile works fine there. Lambertman (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I revoke my request for a total merge; howver, some info on the weekend show should be added to the main article. I'll do it this weekend if noone else wants to. Lambertman (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:West 57th (TV program)

message: Half of the article in its current form is about the fact that Don Hewitt and Dan Rather didn't like it. There is very little about the substance of the show itself. I don't remember the details well enough to write it myself, but someone needs to. JTRH (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Full of questionable assertions
Talk:Morning Express with Robin Meade

message: I put the Rally Caparas paragraph in the article almost a year ago.  At the time it made sense to have it in there.  But with the numerous changes to much of the rest of the lineup since then, it doesn't really make sense to have special mention of him but not other more prominent former members such as Adriana Costa or Will Selva.  Anyway, I think I will delete or heavily edit that paragraph in a few days unless someone objects.
Mantisia (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete the Rally Caparas discussion? 

message: I use the media for many reasons. Television for educational more than entertainment. If Casey Anthony, with all due respect for whomever, were of less in visual looks, ugly, had she gotten the same verdict ? Not in my knowledge of we humans and or the wild animals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tspalready (talk • contribs) 06:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender gap/looks and verdict outcome of Casey Anthony 
Talk:G-spot vibrator

message: The top right-hand object in the image is a Feeldoe - a double dildo with an optional vibrator - and the only way it would be used as a "g-spot vibrator with clitoral teaser" is if you consider the bulb to be a "vibrator" and the ridges to be a "teaser". It is certainly not anything that would come to mind when thinking of "g-spot vibrators".
:Yes, thanks. Great spotted!!! Already removed. Siliconov 15:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Lots of claims about prostate=g-spot, no reliable sources. Let me stress; reliable. Abductive (talk) 17:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. - RoyBoy 17:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: The "G" in G-spot needs to be capitalized because it's named for a person, the German gynecologist Ernst Gräfenberg. Also, in English language research journals it is either referred to at the "Gräfenberg spot," "Gräfenberg zone," or more commonly as the "G-spot," with the "G" capitalized. Dcs002 (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  G-spot capitalization 

message: See merge discussion at Talk:Vibrator_(sex_toy)#Types_of_vibrators._Redundancy.3F.
I Oppose the idea of merging into article Vibrator (sex toy) -- as this topic has plenty of coverage in secondary sources to warrant expansion of this article, and not merging it into another article.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 