lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bhangarh

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: I would like to mention that these are not merely stories or myths. Allegedly there have been many a deaths due to paranormal activities.--Shivamagg2008 18:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Fake 

message: With https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhangarh_Fort  ??? Irish Melkite (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Apart from myths and rumors I've heard of Bhangarh, I finally decided to visit and experience things by myself before getting into some conclusion. So I traveled along the way from Jaipur to Bhangarh on my Car. Later visiting that place, first thing I've observed that the rooms which was built around year 1600-1631 were made up of Cement. Yup strange but true, people asked how could it be possible that It was built with cement whereas according to WIKI cement was invented by Joseph Aspdin Joseph Aspdin took out a patent in 1824 for "Portland Cement," a material he produced by firing finely-ground clay and limestone until the limestone was calcined. He called it Portland Cement because the concrete made from it looked like Portland stone, a widely-used building stone in England. 
But after observing deeply I came to a conclusion that it was build with Cement. There were many rooms which was not allowed to visit, in other words, visitors were afraid to visit there. I visited with my camera and decided to look what was in there, if there is a ghost they'll hunt me, nothing else will happen. So i did. I went inside and yup as soon i went inside rooms and rooms deep inside, There were some kind of screaming, I mean it was very heavy weighted sound, like someone is coming to me from back and trying to tell me not to go inside, when i looked at it, it was a Monkey. Nothing else. But I felt somewhat unconsciousness, and Paranormal activities maybe affected me but other was store of heavy methane gas, which might kill someone if he/she stays there for more than 10 minutes. 
Unluckily I captured video with MUTE mode, so i can not make you guys see that scream of something. But yes sure something was there followed me till I get out of the room. I was very very energetic at the time I went inside rooms but after coming around 10-15 minuts later I was very damn weak, very weak even I felt unconsciousness at that time. I don't know whether it is for some paranormal or some storing of heavy methane gas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miltonbiswascod (talk • contribs) 17:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The story is quite interesting.
Talk:That Darn Cat!

message: This reads a lot like a review. --DrBat 17:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thatdarncat.html --DrBat 18:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's no mention about the fact the J. Edgar Hoover had the FBI investigate the film, production and all. Sarujo (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FBI inverstigation
Talk:The Second Supper

message: Reads like an advertisement. Do we need to know where the owner works?
Also, half the citations are from the organization's own website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.180.1 (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ad Copy / Prune 

message: Request that the subject be given a rating of "Low" on the WikiProject Wisconsin Importance scale; subject matter is a local paper with printed circulation below 3000 (thus making the 300,000 readers-reached comment not only improbable, but possibly misleading) out of a town of less than 60,000 people in rural Wisconsin.
If the subject is to remain on Wikipedia at all (though one could argue it does not satisfy satisfactorily the notability criteria), let us at least designate it at its due level of relative obscurity.
207.230.220.110 13:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rated the article as requested. --Gimme danger 21:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance? 

message: Just how notable is this? The site is down now.17:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Banatsko Veliko Selo

message: I am moving this text that appeared at that page here.  It seems to be in Serbian.  There may be information here that might be profitably added here, by someone who understands the language.  Smerdis of Tlön 18:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text from [[Banatsko veliko selo]]
Talk:55 Cancri b

message: After review, I've determined that this article meets the qualifications for GA status. It is well written, well referenced, and comprehensive. I'm "Mass Passing" this article along with 9 others. The entire list is below. If new developments arise that would effect the references or comprehensiveness of this article, it may affect the others as well.
* 55 Cancri b
* 55 Cancri c
* 55 Cancri d
* 55 Cancri e
* 16 Cygni
* 16 Cygni Bb
* Upsilon Andromedae 
* Upsilon Andromedae b
* Upsilon Andromedae c
* Upsilon Andromedae d
Keep up the good work. These articles are ideal "good articles". They can't be FA, because there is no way for them to get long enough, but they are as comprehensive and complete as possible, and represent a good effort on the part of the editors. Feel free to message me if you have any questions about my rationale. Phidauex 18:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:55 Cancri c

message: After review, I've determined that this article meets the qualifications for GA status. It is well written, well referenced, and comprehensive. I'm "Mass Passing" this article along with 9 others. The entire list is below. If new developments arise that would effect the references or comprehensiveness of this article, it may affect the others as well.
* 55 Cancri b
* 55 Cancri c
* 55 Cancri d
* 55 Cancri e
* 16 Cygni
* 16 Cygni Bb
* Upsilon Andromedae 
* Upsilon Andromedae b
* Upsilon Andromedae c
* Upsilon Andromedae d
Keep up the good work. These articles are ideal "good articles". They can't be FA, because there is no way for them to get long enough, but they are as comprehensive and complete as possible, and represent a good effort on the part of the editors. Feel free to message me if you have any questions about my rationale. Phidauex 18:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:55 Cancri d

message: After review, I've determined that this article meets the qualifications for GA status. It is well written, well referenced, and comprehensive. I'm "Mass Passing" this article along with 9 others. The entire list is below. If new developments arise that would effect the references or comprehensiveness of this article, it may affect the others as well.
* 55 Cancri b
* 55 Cancri c
* 55 Cancri d
* 55 Cancri e
* 16 Cygni
* 16 Cygni Bb
* Upsilon Andromedae 
* Upsilon Andromedae b
* Upsilon Andromedae c
* Upsilon Andromedae d
Keep up the good work. These articles are ideal "good articles". They can't be FA, because there is no way for them to get long enough, but they are as comprehensive and complete as possible, and represent a good effort on the part of the editors. Feel free to message me if you have any questions about my rationale. Phidauex 18:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]

message: I've tried to merge Fischer 2008 m sin i with McArthur 2004 i. Deleted the radius because that information can't be had. --Zimriel (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alterations

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:Per Brahe the Younger

message: 1 Brahehus is not a castle on visingsö, its a castle on the Gränna montain, the castle on visingsö is named "Visingsborgs castle"
2 Per Brahe the younger dident die there, he died att Bogesunds castle in Uppland
Im from the Gränna/Visingsö and know the history.
werry best Henrik — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.209.226.110 (talk) 18:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Object Modeling in Color

message: What does this sentence mean? The user of the system and the sub-sections of the system they visit are all PPTs.  Please define what "system" is, what visit is and what PPTs (Power Points?). Should we use a table that has a column for example?
--Dan 18:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PPT Questions

message: The main text of the article mentions Pink as the color for moment-interval, yet the example diagram uses purple? The UML template  uses purple too, so which is it? --Dex1337 01:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pink or Purple?

message: Not sure about the title of this page. While UML is probably the most natural way currently to represent object models built using Peter Coad's color-coded class archetypes, the technique does not mandate UML. The technique was first used with Peter Coad's own notation in 1997. We switched to UML on that project in 1998 and it was included in the title of Coad et al's book on the subject in 1999. 'Object Modeling in Color' would probably be a better title with UML described as currently the most approporiate graphical notation for it.--86.142.8.96 (talk) 10:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with changing the title of this page, for the reason given above plus the tacit implication (although untrue) that the UML standard incorporates this particular color scheme, which it does not.Jlhollin (talk) 16:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: UML Required?
Talk:Jiajing Emperor

message: Would it not be appropriate to describe his specific genealogy?  Was his father a younger son of the Chenghua Emperor, or was his connection more distant?  john k (talk) 16:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to "The Ritual Formation of Confucian Orthodoxy and the Descendants of the Sage", p569, the Jiajing emperor "insisted on bestowing the title of emperor on his natal father and grandfather (who never actually served as rulers)", so it must be a more remote connection. I'll have a dig and see what I can find out. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

text: His father, Chu Yu-yüan (1476-1519), the Prince of Hsing, was the fourth son of the Ch'eng-hua emperor (r. 1465-1487) and the eldest son of three sons born to the emperor's concubine, Lady Shao. That's taken from The Cambridge History of China (1988), edited by Mote and Twitchett, Volume 7 Part 1, Chapter 7 (which chapter is written by James Geiss) Page 440
--Quywompka (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Genealogy

message: The Jiajing Emperor died in December 1566 or January 1567? Both dates appear in the article. Please clarify. 37.223.167.218 (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: For the editor who makes the lead edit, please follow MOS:LEADLENGTH Danial Bass (talk) 11:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead is too long
Talk:Gwilym Jones

message: Could the Haydon please be removed from the title as it is only the middle name. --Dovea 18:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We should be cautious of identifying people as freemasons because of opposition to freemasonry and conspiracy theories about it. The cited source lists "W.Bro. Gwilym H. Jones", but it could be another man of the same name. However this page has a picture that appears to be the same person as these pictures of our subject. I think this is sufficient, and I will cite the additional source. This source indicates OStJ, which presumably refers to membership of the Venerable Order of Saint John. We should add this if we can find a good source. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freemasonry
Talk:Nigel Forman

message: As he is known as Nigel Forman, could the Francis please be removed from the title? --Dovea 18:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any information on his mother?  He was born in India, and in photos he looks  quite Indian. Was his mother from Simla?  There is nothing about her in the article that I can see. 78.144.93.62 (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother
Template talk:Premier League

message: I just created this:
Template:FA Premier League Matches 2006-07
I have been bold and added it, if you don't like it then tell me why rather than just removing it without a word. - MTC 18:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't have an opinion one way or the other, but just be warned that FAPL fixtures are copyrighted, and the FA charges a fee for their use (results are public domain and don't apply). If anyone at the FA notices them, it could cause problems (at least for the Wikipedia legal team). So basically my advice is proceed at your own risk, as the fixtures might be removed anyway. - Pal 18:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't imagine the FA would have a problem with putting them here for informative purposes, also I wasn't the one who created those fixture pages, I just find them helpful and I thought putting them in a template for easy navigation would be a good idea. - MTC 19:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this template is far too long - some pages like Arsenal F.C. have over a screen's length of navboxes at the bottom now. As this template is generally being included in clubs' and seasons' pages I propose removing the "Football in England" and "Women's Football in England" sections from this template, as they are not directly relevant to clubs or seasons. Qwghlm 12:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wholeheartedly concur. Part of the motivation in standardising these navboxes was to make it easier to drop some of the clutter out. Individual boxes can be transcluded on a case by case basis. ⁂veila# 12:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I've done it (having forgotten to do it some weeks ago!) Qwghlm 22:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too long? 

message: I really don't think this needs to be included in the "Statistics and awards" section of the template, as it is neither. It is simply piped to the Arsenal F.C. season 2003–04 article, which seems to be just another way of adding an Arsenal article to the template.
Then a similar case could be made for adding the Manchester United Treble winning season, or other records achieved by individual clubs. This stuff should not be in the Premier League template in my opinion. What do other people think? Feudonym (talk) 03:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a stand-out Premier League record, it is clearly a notable PL statistic. Another team doing the Treble while losing some games, doesn't change that. MickMacNee (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Arsenal undefeated season"
Talk:Glibenclamide

message: Glyburide, "Glybenclamide" and glibenclamide are one and the same; glyburide is simply the USAN, while glibenclamide is the INN. I am therefore proposing that Glyburide be merged into Glibenclamide, in conformity with Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs/General/Naming of drug pages.
If anyone opposes this merge (or in the event I am completely wrong and these drugs are in fact not the same), please leave a message here or on my talk page.
If there is no opposition, I will perform the merge myself in 24 hours, that is, on July 14, 2006.
Fvasconcellos 18:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. Based on this -->  <-- they are the same. Nephron  T|C 20:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: More information about dosage would be helpful.  Also, what happens if a person starts and stops the medication?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.108.5 (talk) 02:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: GENERAL dosage and administration would be in line with other articles on drugs, though cessation of the drug typically isn't covered, save if there are significant effects from it. From memory, I don't recall any rebound effect ever noted, only diabetic issues will begin again.Wzrd1 (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  more information 

message: — Assignment last updated by JustinxLane (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2023
Talk:Nicholas Scott

message: Please remove Paul from the title - it's a middle name. --Dovea 18:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The introduction refers to him as Sir Nicholas Paul Scott PC JP - no reference in the main body is given for when he became a justice of the peace.
The infobox calls him The Right Honourable Nicholas Scott PC JP - omitting his knighthood and including a redundant post-nominal for his privy council membership.
The titles and styles section gives him an unnecessary Kt for his knighthood but still does not mention JP.
I will do my best to bring harmony to this.
Robin S. Taylor (talk) 16:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles and Styles
Talk:Operation Overlord

message: When I hover the link to this article from another page, the preview text comes up "Operation Spongebob was the codename for the Eugene..."
Why this shows up in the preview but not the article or how to fix it I have no idea, so I thought I'd flag it here for someone who does. Orthostasis (talk) 09:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem was fixed on Match 24. As some pages are cached, it might take a while for the vandalism to disappear completely.  — Diannaa (talk) 11:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preview text vandalism? 

message: When I hover over the link "Battle of Normandy" in Tiger II, it says "Operation Spongebob was the codename for Eugene, the Allied operation that launched..." and yet when I click on it it says "Operation Overlord" and "Battle of Normandy". Someone tell me how to fix it or fix it for me? KingAviationKid (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just give it a few minutes, there was some vandalism that's already been reverted and the cache needs to catch up. Sario528 (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism, of a sort. 

message: user:Bonthefox3 has placed seven templates on the article suggesting that we expand this article using content from the Ukrainian, German, Danish, Portuguese, French, Dutch, and Vietnamese articles. Our English-language article does not need expansion in my opinion, and covers all the major points. It was the subject of a successful Good Article review in 2014. (The Ukranian article you particularly suggest to use is over 33,000 words, which is triple the suggested size for our wiki, and contains a lot of off-topic content, the sort of thing that we could not include if we wish this article to retain its Good Article status.) Bonthefox3, if you think there's content that is missing from this article, it makes more sense in my opinion for you to make specific suggestions here on the talk page as to what you think is missing rather than tagging the article with vague requests for expansion.  — Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand using foreign language articles? 

message: I have changed the map of the break-out in July-August, from this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Normandybreakout.jpg
-to this one:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Normandy_Breakout_Map,_operations_25_July_to_15_August_1944.svg
This map is based on the first, but in better resolution, in .svg and also with a slightly longer time period (start with the break-out on 25 July), it also has explanations for most used symbols. I want to add that is is made on my request, paid for me, by a contributor that has helped me with various maps before. If anyone feel that they would prefer to keep the old map, they may revert my change. Ulflarsen (talk) 18:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed map of break-out
Talk:PopClips

message: I was able to make a few changes based on the source indicated (i.e. the host, correct spelling of the director's name, its appearance on Nickelodeon, and the MTV relationship.) Other information or statements included still need verification. Also, the name of the show may have been Popclips, but without a visual of the official logo, I can't be certain so I've left the entry as is.
--JWMcCalvin 18:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The New Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock and Roll ("Popclips") and MTV article ("PopClips") both spell it that way (without the space), however I believe the title screen was all in capitals so the two words using lower case would be "PopClips", however I see that other articles use "Pop Clips" but I haven't seen any of the actual title screens, if anyone has a screenshot it'd be helpful and could be used as a article header. As for now 'PopClips' seems like it is a combination of the two most used versions and all links point to this one article, if changing the title please make sure you have the redirects still pointing to the new name. So far the 'Rolling Stone Encyclopedia' seems to be the only reference source for the name, while others mention the show being spelled differently and don't list any references. (Floppydog66 (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article's name
Talk:Black nobility

message: Evaluate the following sources for historical inaccuracy and refute with additional sources if possible: [][][][][][]— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.8.78.218 (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources