lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Malaysian ringgit

message: There is a problem. If you scroll down, you will see a some black boxes in the tables
. What has happened here? 49.178.123.9 (talk) 01:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Same problem at version 992003726 which was a year ago, so it's not some editing mistake. Sorry, I'm not good enough to trouble shoot, someone will find it.  - FlightTime (open channel) 01:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also cannot figure it out.49.178.123.20 (talk) 03:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been customary to make the background of image cells black or white to give better contrast to the images.  However, since this article's tables have no images (some have external links to images), it doesn't make much sense to have that sort of contrast.  I've removed the coloring for now, but we can always re-add it if images are added. - ZLEA T\C 17:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you.  - FlightTime (open channel) 17:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

text:  I'm amazed that no one has taken photos of ringgit notes.49.178.123.20 (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all banknotes can be legally scanned.  According to c:COM:CUR Malaysia, "You are not allowed to reproduce the Malaysian currency. It is also illegal for you to use any photograph, drawing or design of any note, coin or any part of the note or coin, of any size, scale or colour, in any advertising or on any merchandise or products, which are manufactured, sold, circulated or distributed except with the permission of BNM". - ZLEA T\C 15:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem 

message: There is a note for verification needed of an unreliable source that appears to have been present a long time:
All coins have the initials GC on the reverse, below the Parliament House. It stands for Geoffrey Colley, Malaysia first coin series' designer.  
I can't find any support besides the unverifiable blog post, and even the blog post does not fully support the statement here without qualifiers. I would like to remove it.
Nurtam85 (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: request to remove line, currency designer

message: Hxtxfzbnz. Vxvzbzvzv bznbzbzbsnsmmxnzgnsmouuufvfdgxbxn..
 2603:6080:9405:3E6:853F:801B:21BE:C401 (talk) 23:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:    S.  B bzgZvgsgshd can bx xmxniacn x xnxhxh
Talk:10NES

message: "Camerica succcessfully reverse engineereed the code to produce unlicensed games."
Really? I thought Camerica (which published Codemasters games in the US) used the same Macronix -5 volt spike method that Color Dreams games used. --Damian Yerrick 05:18, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camerica 

message: Thankyou To Whoever Formatted The Picture, I Forgot How As I Usually Only Cruise Wiki Occaisonally.
Offensiveandconfusing 20:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Lots of info about the CIC chip, Tengen's Rabbit clone, and reverse engineering them both here:  67.64.66.99 03:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse engineering 

message: Nearly all instances of the Citation Needed tag are for information mentionned in the references at the end of the article.  Should they be removed, or should the references be turned into footnotes? --Dandin1 (talk) 13:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed 

message: So, how would this actually work, with respect to the CIC chip? By the sounds of the article, it sounds like it would damage the NES. Any games that are known to do this? Would anybody more in the know like to add some info about that? 81.225.91.19 (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voltage Spike 

message: The courts made a ruling on liability in the Tengen case, they did not however make a ruling nor full and accurate report on what actually happened (nor did anybody involve seek for them to do so). Engineers working for Tengen successfully reverse-engineered the 10NES and got their rabbit chip running 100% perfectly but at the wrong speed. So someone outside the team (apparently) lied to get the patent info and handed the information to someone else in the company to do some testing. Before they could spread the word that thee rabbit was running fine but at the wrong speed, the original engineers had already solved their problem. Later the engineers found out what other people in the company had done and were pissed. All their hard work was rendered meaningless. They would have to live with labels of incompetence and trademark violators for the rest of their carriers despite being completely successful and innocent in doing their jobs. Nintendo would not have wanted these facts known anyhow. Their statements in court all but said dumb lazy Americans were incapable of reverse engineering what Japanese engineers had created.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.33.117 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabbit Chip 

message: CIC (Nintendo) and this article contain many redundant paragraphs. I am unable to find out where they should stay and where they should be replaced by a link. 78.53.207.73 (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a merge would be appropriate, I don't know which way makes more sense.  Other languages appear to use 10NES.  The WikiData interlanguage links will need repairing after this is decided. --j⚛e deckertalk 06:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with CIC (Nintendo)
Talk:List of American Football League players

message: What was the name of the club-footed kicker back during the late sixties or early seventies that set a pro football record for the longest field goal(63 yds)? He either played for the Saints or the Raiders.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.116.195 (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be called "List of American Football People" if it is going to remain like this. Men like Harry Wismer, an early owner, and Lou Saban, a coach, never played a single down in the league, even though they were certainly crucial to its development.  There should either be a separate list for such people, or this one should be retitled to reflect this fact.  2600:1004:B16F:EB9:C9B6:DD41:5D67:A617 (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed the non-players. How would we determine the inclusion criteria for the non-players anyway? There are probably more contributors than the ones listed here. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:46, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That is one of the things that could become one of the infamous "Incomplete lists", I suppose.  Anyone who is cited in a reliable source as an AFL contributor would potentially belong.  Founding owners like Ralph Wilson, Bud Adams, Lamar Hunt, and of course Harry Wismer definitely belong, as do the people who were also owners later on like Sonny Werblin, who signed Namath, early coaches and the like also, and yes, it's far less definite and objective than who demonstrably was on a team roster or who actually appeared in a game unless it is limited to people like coaching staff members, officials, known owners, and broadcasters for whom there are definitive published records providing their identities to link them to the league.  Anyone can SAY that they, their father, their uncle, whoever, was a part-owner of a team, worked in the front office or as a scout, etc., but unless there is reliable published proof, they, needless to say, shouldn't be included at all.  2600:1004:B16F:EB9:C9B6:DD41:5D67:A617 (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also :Category:American Football League contributors. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better name
Template talk:BSD

message: Note that "all rights reserved" is a mandatory part of a valid copyright notice in several countries. It does not limit use any more than c in a circle. All copyright notices which don't want the work to be PD in those countries should include it. Jamesday 05:27, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: The current wording of the template has the advertising clause, i.e. is 4-clause BSD. Shouldn't this be changed to 3-clause and an 4-clause-BSD template be created?--Oneiros (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  4-clause BSD vs. 3-clause BSD
Talk:Mark Lombardi

message: So did he die in 1999 or 2000 (or some other year)? --142.68.242.196 05:52, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: NY Time obituary. 2000. Definitely 2000. --Maru  (talk) Contribs 06:11, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date 

message: Add a picture of Mark and one of his artworks. 129.21.183.31 21:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do 

message: Should we add a section for Films?
* Mark Lombardi: Death-defying Acts of Art and Conspiracy - English --87.170.199.98 (talk) 01:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It already has a paragraph in the posthumous exhibits section. Why do you think it needs its own section? —David Eppstein (talk) 05:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  doc
Talk:Bandura

message: Is the following a better presentation? Bobanni (talk) 06:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Presentation of photos?
Talk:List of Bronx neighborhoods

message: Could someone tell me if my neighborhood groupings are correct? I believe they are but it if anyone here is from the Bronx could you help me confirm? (example Westchester Square is part of Castle Hill?)
Soundview is in the South Bronx? I always thought of that as the East Bronx.
I think something better could be chosen for the neighborhood listing then a baseball field. Its kind of misleading as to what its actually supposed to represent.
:Perhaps you can find a better image, free of any copyright issues. --Zimbabweed 18:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: In case anyone hadn't noticed, Wikipedia:Communities strawpoll is voting on a uniform naming convention for all neighborhoods of U.S. cities. The proposition currently leading by a wide margin would apparently entail renaming most New York City neighborhood articles to something like neighborhood, New York, New York. older ≠ wiser 19:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood naming convention 

message: This is just stupid.  United States does not have "aristocracy", so this writer is wrong.
Affluence is the better term.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.20.89.211 (talk) 14:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Riverdale known for its aristocracy" 

message: I suggest removing Pelham Bay Park, and Orchard Beach, as they are parks, not neighborhoods. 
I would also like to point out that Rikers Island, is both an island and a populated location, so it may also count as a neighborhood.
Since Marble Hill is not a part of the Bronx, perhaps it should be listed under its own section?
HugoHelp (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parks, Prison, & Marble Hill 

message: Does anybody know if Olinville is another name for, or a subsection of, Williamsbridge? Or is it regards as a completely different neighborhood? HugoHelp (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Williamsbridge vs Olinville Comment 

message: Great reference only half complete. Fordham, Zarega, Hunts Point among just a few not mentioned and where is Arthur Ave. There is a North Bronx and a very important South Bronx Mosholu Pkwy 
Prospect Ave Washington Hieghts Kingsbridge Section. Many neighborhoods left out of this article. Still very good reference and accurate. Bronx Native 2603:8001:6CF0:85C0:6D04:910:326D:B62C (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many Neighborhoods Not included
Talk:Youth International Party

message: Can someone explain why this page has been made part of the series on Socialism in America? Nowhere in the content of this article is socialism, or even communism, substantively mentioned. And for good reason. It's an excellent article, in my view, that shows what the Yippies were--not ideological at all, in fact quite outspokenly anti-ideological. It seems ignorant, if not tendentious, to label the Yippies in this way. If someone can't provide logical justification for this inclusion, I would like to have the article removed from that series, on grounds of historical and intellectual accuracy. Gregapan (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification for including this page as part of Socialism in America 

message: I don't think the Yippies were really post-left. The concept didn't exist until later in the 70s, and Hoffman's background in Critical Theory makes me skeptical that he would have ever considered himself that way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4041:3A5:B500:6118:EC74:C250:2E00 (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Left?
Talk:List of presidents of Romania

message: Wasn't Sadoveanu Chairman of Parliament in 1945? Mikkalai 07:19, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Should this be named Presidents of Romania, and the template Presidents of Romania?
: No, the Wikipedia manual of style says that lists must be named List of... Bogdan | Talk 10:59, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, no. I was asking if the list should be named List of Presidents, considering the fact that they weren't all presidents. --gcbirzantalk 22:07, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now there are only presidents and interim presidents. --ES Vic (talk) 09:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Unpledged elector

message: I think this page could use a little more explanation of what exactly an unpledged elector is, and why they aren't pledged to a certain candidate. This is particularly important for non-Americans who aren't familiar with the Electoral College. -R. fiend 07:30, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In presidential elections in the United States, the electoral vote is cast by people chosen as Presidential Electors. Before the "general election," each party files a slate of Electors in each state. Occasionally, a group of Electors will run which is not pledged to any candidate. If these "unpledged Electors" win a state, they have an opportunity to assess the political situation and then decide how to cast their electoral votes. In most cases historically, unpledged Electors have been a ballot option when a group of voters feels that no candidate is addressing the most serious issues of the time. 
Chronicler3 13:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Introductory Paragraph

message: Saw the cleanup needed notice and was bold and did a complete rewrite.  Comments welcome.  I elminated the material on the 1948 election because there were no unpledged electors in that election -- the "States Rights Democrats" were in fact pledged to Thurmond in advance.  --Jfruh (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Total rewrite.  Whaddya think?
Talk:G.I. Joe/Archive 1

message: User:Lee Daniel Crocker (who appears to have gone inactive more than a year ago) moved this here from G.I. Joe in May 2003.  I can't fathom why (since G.I. is not initials but a quasi acronym), and there is no explanation here.  I'm inclined to move it back, but I thought I'd post here to see if any of the page's normal contributors can justify keeping the space in G.I. —Tkinias 07:46, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Geography of Tonga

message: Isn't most of this just lifted from the CIA World Factbook? If so, is that appropriate to Wiki? 211.30.47.220
:The material is OK; see CIA_World_Factbook#Copyright.  FYI, you can find Wikipedia's copyright policy here. Dave6 08:39, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - but even though there is no copyright issue, is it suitable to just copy-paste large slabs of information from external sources? This is probably in a Wikipedia policy document somewhere, I'll look it up. 211.30.47.220 04:07, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I hardly think that just taking everything off CIA is a very good thing to do even if legal...
I edited citing resources from the cia book. I am also adding more information about the climate.
<<Camdo2>> (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Is OK? 
Talk:List of Japanese-language television channels

message: Should this list also include television stations that broadcast some Japanese language programming, but also programming in other languages, such as KSCI in Los Angeles, California? gK ¿? 08:32, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I fail to understand why the list with just 11 Japanese regions (out of 55) is "Much better and more useful!" than the complete table precisely covers all the terrestrial stations in Japan. But then again, maybe zero English speakers have interest in living in those 44 unrepresented regions in Japan. Oh well.Kzaral 15:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 222.148.38.44's edit (00:43, 4 October 2006)
Talk:Snares Islands / Tini Heke

message: The islands aren't called "Snares Islands". They are officially "The Snares". [[User:Grutness|Grutness talk ] 08:44, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Yoo Young-chul

message: I took out everything except the introduction.  There were no sources verifying the stories, and weren't written in a style appropriate for an encyclopedia.  If anyone would like to add stories, check out the link at the bottom of the page.  It offers background stories to some of his murders, and with a little digging one could better profile his actions and his victims.  SolitaryThrush (talk) 12:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:Variable speed of light

message: Now that the Einstein digital papers are online, it's possible to search various papers to determine Einstein's opinion about the speed of light. For example you can find this where in the second paragraph Einstein says this:
"Second, this consequence shows that the law of the constancy of the speed of light no longer holds, according to the general theory of relativity, in spaces that have gravitational fields".
That wasn't written in 1911. It was written in 1920. I'm afraid it's a popscience myth, or a rewriting of history, to claim that Einstein abandoned the variable speed of light in 1911. You can find other examples yourself. Note that in some of the translations you see the word "velocity" instead of "speed". Some will tell you that this is the vector quantity velocity. It isn't, it's the common usage, as per high-velocity bullet. Have a read of this Baez article written by Don Koks for another example. See the general relativity section. JohnDuffield (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Einstein's view 

message: If c_0 is the speed of light absent of gravity, should not c --- the speed of light in presence of gravity --- be smaller? The formula then should rather have a minus sign as in 1-2GM/rc^2, converging nicely to 0 as r approaches the Schwarzschild radius r_s=2GM/c^2 from above?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.92.251.76 (talk) 08:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In Alexander Unzicker and Jan Preuss, "A Machian Version of Einstein's Variable Speed of Light Theory", the same formula is given as c_0/c whereas this page gives it as c/c_0. I believe the former is correct as the speed of light is deemed to be lower in the vicinity of mass.TonyP (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Einstein referenced it first in his notes from 1907 as the "spatial variability of c" when referencing the effects of mass on the speed of light, but he was also equally referencing variability over time. Dicke was expanding that idea to cosmological Redshift; I think c_0/c would imply exclusivity of mass in affect toward c. I'm not sure, though. -- Sleyece (talk) 01:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sign error in Dicke's refraction formula?
Talk:Higher Preparatory Examination (HF)

message: Is there any particular reason that wikification was reverted? I don't really care, but I fail to see what difference it makes that there has been minor wikification done. Peregrine981 10:50, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
Mostly because it goes against Wikipedia's style guide to link to Wikis in the bold type that seperates different subejcts, although what I'll do is go through and take the other edits you made and incorporate them. Páll 20:22, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:AIDS Kills Fags Dead

message: Will we ever be able to end this pointless discussion? I am sorry, but I just don't understand why anyone would want a redirect to be deleted. Could someone please explain that to me?
Secondly, CheeseDreams has just redirected the page to Nazi, claiming that this is "appropriate". What are you people doing here? <KF> 11:17, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
:All I did was revert CheeseDreams' edit. I tend to agree that there's usually no reason to delete a redirect. Some cases do need to be deleted, such as redirecting insults to people's user pages. It's pretty clear to me that this redirect should stay and point to Anti-gay slogan. Rhobite 22:52, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
----
This topic has been discussed to death at Talk:AKFD and subpages, particularly Talk:AKFD/redirect. The end-result (with votes) on a whole raft of similar redirects seemed to be a community decision to keep only this one, and Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead'.
(I personally would concur in this particular case, because of the need to prevent the creation of a new article if this is deleted, but that's purely a practical concern, and not an overwhelmingly strong one. With the increasing number of new editors here, that's a real issue. I suppose we could have agreed to blank it, and leave it protected in that state, which would accomplish much the same thing, but the practical difference between the two solutions is minimal.) 
I have no dog in this hunt (i.e. I don't give a hoot one way or the other what is done with this, other than the purely practical concern above), I'm simply the admin who wound up dealing with this after it was brought to WP:RfD. All I am doing is implementing that prior carefully considered community decision. All of which is a long-winded way of saying that if anyone does mess with it, I will revert and protect it in the blink of an eye. If you don't like the current state, get a community consensus to do it, and it will cheerfully be changed. Noel (talk) 00:47, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:TCN

message: I thought Packer now owned QTQ-9 in Brisbane?  That's what I meant to imply in that paragraph - I didn't mean it to sound like QTQ and NWS were now both owned by Packer/PBL. -- Chuq 11:21, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: sounds in one paragraph like packer never owned brisbane and perth stations, then in the later paragraph it says he bought them from alan bond! They both can't be right!
Packers eventually owned all Nines in capital cities by the late 60s, although TCN-9 in Sydney was the only one they started from scratch in 1956. Murdoch bought Ten (Illawarra) in 1964 and illegally pointed the antenna at Sydney (I remember the shit reception and programs). He had to sell it when the x-ownership laws came into force. The Nine network syndication started in 1964. Kerry sold selected stations to Bond, including Bris, Adelaide, and Perth. They were the ones losing money. The buy back figure as I remember was $165M, not $200M as stated in the article. Bond Media was a public cpy, and most of the shareholders were small private retirement funds. They lost out since they were not secured.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.229.8 (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  owning stations 

message: A number of titles listed (past and present) even though have aired on TCN, were not produced at TCN studios, eg. The Sullivans (GTV-9), Here's Humphrey (NWS-9) and Hey Hey It's Saturday while it had some special editions from TCN-9, it was primarily produced out of GTV-9 Melbourne.
-- I agree. Sorry to say to people who put it in this article.. but Hey Hey it's Saturday was produced in Melbourne. And also some This Is Your Life episodes were produced in Melbourne. It depends where the people they were dedicating live. My family have attended many episodes of This is Your Life in Melbourne. :)
HHIS was produced in Melb even when 0-Ten did it for one year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.229.8 (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Productions at TCN-9 