lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cuts Like a Knife

message: I'm curious if it's worth noting that the cover photograph was taken by Jim O'Mara - http://www.jamesomara.com/portfolio/music/music12.html - and if so where it should be noted on the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.93.133 (talk) 05:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Photo 
Talk:Emile

message: This page should probably be turned into a disambiguation page, with different entries for each of the Emiles.
--FashionNugget 04:29, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: For anyone still following this page, please see Talk:Emile, or On Education#Requested move czar ♔ 23:01, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion
Talk:Lawrence Miles

message: Has there been any backlash aside from the flap on OG? Just wondering if this really is notable. --khaosworks 05:16, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unquiet dead controversy

message: Dunno if this counts as independent verification, but I happen to know that it's true — I met his fiancée at the Gallifrey convention.  (I think anyone who frequents OG's Forum knows her as well.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 16:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it used to be. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 14:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miles' engagement 

message: Does anyone recall what site the "farewell interview" used to be on?  I can't find it on Google, which makes me suspect that the site has gone down — but I can't check archive.org without knowing what site it was on.  —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 10:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it and added the link (though I forgot to log in at the time). Doloras 21:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miles' "farewell interview" 

message: Do reliable sources exist for this article or does it need the flamerthrowers turning on it? --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is long on puff, short on reliable sources 

message: Sorry MikeWazowski, but you can't hide the truth by calling it an "unreliable link." Scuttlest (talk) 03:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quit trying to cover it up 

message: I have removed the 'controversy' section from this article: it listed a couple of 'controversies', but was pretty poorly sourced, and did not make it at all clear that either was sufficiently 'infamous' to be worth mentioning in an encyclopaedic biography. Robofish (talk) 00:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section removed
Talk:Morgan Stanley

message: I tried to retrieve the reference #25: "Morgan Stanley Case Study" (PDF). FEMA. Retrieved April 27, 2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_Stanley#cite_ref-25. But the landing page for the link turned out to be a 404 "not found" page.
I tried to search using the search feature on the site and ultimately found the (supposed) content at https://www.ready.gov/business/business-testimonials which features a section that matched the context for the reference quite well and also provides a link to a PDF containing the specific section only.
Hopefully some more experienced editors/moderators would be able to review and verify the above and update the said reference or ask me to it.
Manish Jhawar (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned FEMA reference to Morgan Stanley case study (#25) 

message: My brother told me that our grandmother was a vice president or Morgan Stanley and I haven't been able to prove or disprove it since I haven't been able to find out who the former vice presidents were. 2601:197:4500:5BF0:6CCF:9D44:9E2D:ED7B (talk) 03:51, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are the former vice presidents? 

message: This is a laundry list of very specific and (relative to the overall history of the company) minor events and violates WP:SUMMARYSTYLE. Any suggestions on how to cut it down? 129.67.116.23 (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuits section
Talk:Eightfold way (physics)

message: I've got some nice diagrams made up for this page of the baryon octet etc. that I just need to finalize and upload, but it probably won't happen until after the semester's over.  --Laura Scudder | Talk 05:33, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice diagrams 

message: I've changed the article back to it's original state - plus a mention of quark model in first paragraph and nice images I'd forgotten about to come in a few minutes - because it predates the quark model and has enough relavent information to be said on it that doesn't fit there as it is fundamentally phenomenological.  It is an outdated, pure categorization scheme for particles that we now understand better, but discussion is warranted before becoming only a redirect.--Laura Scudder | Talk 05:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: The Delta ( (uuu)) has the spin of all three quarks aligned.  What is the particle formed when one of the quarks is anti-parallel to the others?  It should have spin 1/2, yet doesn't appear in the octet.  Why is that? --Michael C. Price talk 10:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: uuu in anti-parrallel configuration is forbidden by Pauli. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't get that.  They have different colours, so Pauli exclusion can't apply. --Michael C. Price talk 21:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delta spin

message: Chi particle on bottom-right should feature ZERO charge, not PLUS (see 'File:Baryon decuplet.png')  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.3.126.106 (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake found in SuperMultiplet pic (see 'File:Baryon Supermultiplet using four-quark models and half spin.png')
Talk:Uses and gratifications theory

message: This article is definitely pretty developed. The content seems to all be there, and the organization makes sense. There are ample references as well. One thing missing right off the bat, however, are any sort of visuals. I don't know if any visuals exist that could be included on the page, but that could help visitors better understand the concept. The lead paragraph is great, but it's a bit long compared to other articles. I don't think it necessarily needs to be changed but if you do change it, maybe make it more concise. The tone is neutral and nothing seems particularly biased. I noticed that the most recent additions came from several months ago, including added references. I know that references for this article is going to be hard since there are already so many, so I would suggest knocking out a couple of those sources by adding visuals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atw58 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review  

message: Explain in details 197.187.104.3 (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a process gratification? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Natalie750 (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Communication Theory

message: — Assignment last updated by Xinyue Hu (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160B

message: — Assignment last updated by Emm075 (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communication Theory
Talk:Schuyler

message: To who included "Schuyler Anderson": establish who this is before including him on this disambiguation page. --DanielNuyu 05:43, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a book by E.L. Konigsburg titled The Outcasts of 19 Schuyler Place. Mention? --Glimmer721 talk 00:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Book
Talk:Liancourt Rocks/Archive 2

message: Did you revert the Dokdo page? I was correcting it. Liancourt rocks is a vougous name. It is by western 'discovery'. If I call Netherlands as 'Jong's flat land', the people in Netherlands won't like it. The same applies to Dokdo. It is an official and proper name (regardless of any dispute) for the moment. So, we should keep Dokdo as the prime name for Liancourt's rocks. --Jong 12:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverts
Talk:James Gobbo

message: This page needs much expansion. Where was he educated before university? Details about his time at Oxford (degree, college, etc.)? Why was he knighted? Rsie through the legal ranks? His time as governor?
--Harro5 06:04, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
:I agree, it's a little patchy for such a notable person. Rogerthat Talk 03:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Cumbey

message: Constance's threat that "And neither does the statement that "There is one thing that SqueakBox published that is utter defamatory and it is a promise, not a threat that (Constance) will take legal action UNLESS IT IS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED" certainly is against Wikipedian rules, y'know.  — Rickyrab | Talk 06:12, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Germany/Archive 3

message: Germany is ranked as the 13th largest nation in terms of population. However, according to List_of_countries_by_population it's ranked 14th.
:Those figures are a projection for July 2005, however. Saintswithin 12:10, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small error 

message: For some reason my corrections with respect to the populations which were murdered in WOII were undone *after* the page was protected. Notably the homosexuals were removed and the Sinti tribe, which is together with the Roma tribe part of the Roma people, was reentered. Also the link to the Porajmos, the Roma people's equivalent of the Holocaust, is to my opinion very important. I assume the undoing of my edits was a mistake and look forward to these facts being fixed once more. I believe that these populations deserve to be included in a correct manner. There is no reason that errors should be added to the contents of a page, after it is protected. gidonb 22:12, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The unprotection of this article was a mistake, so the article was reverted back to its originally protected version. The page was not supposed to be unprotected as the dispute had not been successfully resolved and would have turned into another edit way. These edits will be restored once the page is unprotected again. However, this will not happen until Heimdal either chooses to discuss the dispute or is banned. When either of these events happen, then a request can be made at wikipedia:requests for protection. --Jiang 02:10, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is the way admins must handle the situation by protocol, no problem. I am all in favor of applying the rules with respect to Heimdal. As long as my comments will be considered at one stage or another. gidonb 07:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Can I suggest you poll opinion between the two versions?  If there's a consensus in favour of one version or the other (or any point in between) it should be possible to unprotect the page on that basis, regardless of the participation of any particular individual.  Long-term protection is not a good option (or an especially likely one, I'd imagine).  Alai 10:51, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes after the protection
Talk:Drug court

message: 2606:1C00:2802:27:0:0:0:17A3 (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

message: Hi there- brand new member, though I've come to wikipedia for info, actually how I ended up here today. I can update your references I think rather easily. A lot has come out in drug court literature during the 2000s. The cite you mention to Roman et al's study should be added (2003), and Belenko is a central author in drug court research. I could supplement and develop a number of areas. I think this is a good start, but there are topics and conditions of treatment you describe here that may be specific to certain jurisdictions' areas that were covered in the lit you cite. And, the approach to treatment is so-called "therapeutic jurisprudence" (my POV on "so-called"), involving a system of sanctions and rewards to change behavior. This needs fleshed out. I could help with this if you are open to these changes. Best, Valerie
:Please feel free to update the article. Wikipedia is all about many users updating articles, so no need to ask my permission. :) -Jonamerica (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  references, and some clean up recommended 

message: Wow, this article is brimming with biased language; and I personally support drug courts:
>Drug court are often touted as the single most successful intervention in US history for leading people struggling with serious addiction out of the justice system and into lives of health and long-term recovery  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:1C00:2802:27:0:0:0:17A3 (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs to be cleaned up
Talk:Parlement

message: Why is Savoy listed here?  It was not part of ancien régime France.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Kenney (talk • contribs) 18:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savoy? 

message: The term "Parliament of Paris" appears twice, and "parliament" and "parliamentary" also appear.  Should these actually say "parlement"?    Randall Bart    Talk   16:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  parliament 

message: "In 1789 there were 13 parlements, ... Each was composed of a dozen or more appellate judges, or about 1,100 nationwide."
But 13 * 12 = 156, not 1,100. To get 1,100 each court would have to have 84 judges, which is 7 dozen; nothing like "a dozen or more" which in English means something considerably under 24. I hope someone who knows more about this, can correct the phrase to "several dozen" or verify my math. Thanks, Nick Beeson (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would guess that in this case "dozen or more" means "from 12 to infinity"... But we need a source anyway. Thus I'll undo your change and add the tags... --Martynas Patasius (talk) 23:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math error 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sovereign Court of Lorraine and Barrois. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sovereign Court of Lorraine and Barrois" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Hello all- I am renaming the article to the singular term, which is how entry terms are listed in reference works. See WP:SINGULAR. Eric talk 18:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to singular term
Talk:Moisés Alou

message: Could someone (preferably a speaker of Spanish) add the IPA for his name?  I've heard "moy-ses" and I've heard "moy-say".  Which one is correct? →Vik Reykja 07:06, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA

message: Can someone explain why his last name is listed as Beltre?
Must have been a mistake. I fixed it. NickBall 12:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No is not a mistake. According to this, this, this, and this that's his real name, and the story behind it. Osplace 11:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Beltre?

message: I have added two images of Alou to the article that were previously on here. Even though they show him in a Giants uniform, I feel that having images for this article, especially of his unusual batting stance, is important until they can be replaced with fair use images from his current team. - NickBall 06:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Giants Images

message: Please stop replacing the free use pic of him with a copyvio one Em0. Also explain how the free use photo of him is "disgusting" like you put in one of you edit summaries. Quadzilla99 17:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *The account adding the non-free use pic has been blocked indefinitely.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks, that was both lame and ridiculous. Quadzilla99 20:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moises Alou pic

message: The picture date was incorrect because it read that he was with the Gaints in March 2006, the picture was taken at Busch Stadium II in St. Louis, at that time Busch Stadium II had been demolished and Busch Stadium III was on the site  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.200.253.182 (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Date Incorrect  
Talk:Khoisan languages/to do

message: To be added to the article:
#References/Bibliography (made a start)
#Internal classification (this is at List of Khoisan languages and perhaps should be merged --kwami 20:54, 2005 August 31 (UTC))
#*Hadza (isolate)
#*Sandawe (isolate)
#*South African Khoisan [not known to be a valid genetic node]
#**Northern (Ju) [essentially an isolate]
#**Central (Khoe)
#**Southern (!Ui-Taa)
#**Isolate (=Hõã) [unclassified, not an isolate]
#**Undetermined (probably Central) (Kwadi) 
#Khoisan research
#A map of the actual situation would be cool, as well as a map of their distribution in early colonial times (similar to the one in Güldemann & Vossen 2000) - look here, but they are all in Russian. 
#*If you like some of them I'll try to find time to translate it.Koryakov Yuri 13:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cyperus esculentus

message: Why is this article in :Category:Valencia (autonomous community)?--Rockero 21:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article: "Presently, they are mainly cultivated - at least for extended and common commercial purposes - in Spain, where they were introduced by Arabs, almost exclusively in the Valencia region." Laogooli 22:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: The article states:
 This tuber is rich in energy content (starch, fat, sugar, and protein), minerals (mainly phosphorus and potassium), and vitamins E and C thus making  this tuber also suitable for diabetics
This needs some additional evidence because I don't see how this makes C. esculentus more suitable for diabetics than potatoes.
http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/food/what-can-i-eat/making-healthy-food-choices/grains-and-starchy-vegetables.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by N-double-u (talk • contribs) 09:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suitable for diabetics? 

message: It should be noted: 
Cyperus (Cyperus esculentus L.) is an edible perennial grass-like plant, which propagates exclusively with underground tubers. Its tubers are rich in starch (20-30%), fat (25-35%), sugar (10-20%), protein (10-15%) and dietary fiber (8-9%). In addition, the tubers also contain alkaloids, organic acids, vitamins (C and E), steroids, terpenoids and other active components. The contents of oleic acid and linoleic acid in Cyperus oil are very high, which have important medicinal value and health-promoting properties. Most of the extracts from the tubers, stems and leaves of Cyperus have allelopathic potential and antibacterial, antioxidant and insecticidal activities. In recent years, the planting area of Cyperus has increased significantly all over the world, especially in China and some other countries. This paper presents the current status of Cyperus and the recent trend in research in this area. Published reports on its nutritional contents, active ingredients, medicinal efficacy, antibacterial activity and allelopathic potential were also reviewed.
Zhang S, Li P, Wei Z, Cheng Y, Liu J, Yang Y, Wang Y, Mu Z. Cyperus (Cyperus esculentus L.): A Review of Its Compositions, Medical Efficacy, Antibacterial Activity and Allelopathic Potentials. Plants (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;11(9):1127. doi: 10.3390/plants11091127. PMID: 35567128; PMCID: PMC9102041. 146.168.153.135 (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medicinal Super Food
Talk:Shad Thames

message: I see that my reference to Jacob's Island has been removed. The following website claims that Jacob's Island was part of, or another name for, Shad Thames:
http://www.thames.org.uk/pages/guide2.htm
Does anyone have any reason to cast doubt on it?
Ogg 08:02, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No references. Please read WP:GA? --SeizureDog 15:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: I've restored the list of films shot in Shad Thames - it seems harmless to me and of some interest, e.g. to people who have seen one or more of the films and who are visiting the area. Ben Finn 18:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of films

message: I have removed the end of the introductory paragraph, that read " itself because the Knights Templar of the Order of St John owned land locally;The Swiftstone Trust web site if so..."
The Knights Templar had nothing to do with St. John. I believe the author was confusing them with the Knights Hospitaller. However, as I cannot say whether the Hospitallers ever owned land at Shad Thames it would be inappropriate to simply change the wording. 
OTOH, if anybody can make an etymological link between "Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon" and "Shad Thames" I will buy them a Mars Bar.
The reference for the orignial statement was also no longer functioning, which itself hardly adds weight to the original wording.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.105.207 (talk) 11:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knights Templar removed 

message: I've cut this as the lyrics don't mention Shad Thames - they mention Thames Street:
The pop punk band All Time Low from Baltimore refer to the location in their 2007 single "Six Feet Under The Stars" in a line in which the singer says "Meet me on Thames Street"
Ben Finn (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: All Time Low

message: Can we find a reliable source for the etymology of the name "Shad Thames"? It's already in evidence on William Morgan's 1682 map of London, so the article's supposition that it has something to do with the 18th century Church of St John is not plausible (moreover, the idea that "St John at Thames" could somehow transform into "Shad Thames" stretches credulity). The second supposition made in the article, that the name means something like "stretch of the Thames abounding in shads", is not out of the realm of possibility, but this would be a very unusual name for a street. I've consulted A. D. Mills' Dictionary of London Place-Names, but Shad Thames is skipped over unfortunately. Zacwill (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name