Talk:List of wine-producing countries

message: Can someone update that now, it's mid-2006? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.116.97 (talk • contribs) 
  
: Also the FAO source is out of date... Klepas 05:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  list is THREE years old! 

message: Even though California is not its own country, it would be nice to see it appear on the list to compare with other major wine-making regions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.3.146 (talk • contribs) 
: I understand the feeling, being from California myself, but that isn't an inclusion criteria here. The California wine article does exist. An unsourced statement there states:
:: "California would be the fourth largest producer of wine in the world if it were an independent nation."
: That's probably true, and is in harmony with its huge production of fruit and vegetables. IIRC, it is number five in the world. -- Fyslee/talk 18:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  California 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Please change both, introduction (speaking of 2005, although data of 2007 is presented) and data (refers to Unted Nations statistics, but does not match them; probably production of grapes and wine have been mixed up). The data is definitely wrong (at least in parts) and misleading. Also a broader coverage of more countries would be desireable; an article page for a mere top 20 countries does not seem justified. Thank you!
Nico78 (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Nico78, 6 May 2010 

message: Figures in the two tables are identical! I don't think that's possible.--Gspinoza (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the only difference is that the older table has also places 21-70. Vandalism or some kind of mistake? 82.141.95.168 (talk) 09:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

text: And the previous sections' answer to the 'request' is also weird, unless it was made sometime when the tables (or the top20) were not the same. 82.141.95.168 (talk) 09:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identical figures in tables 

message: After all, the vandalism was over a year ago. 82.153.198.135 (talk) 19:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unprotected. Rmhermen (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this still need to be protected?

message: I updated to the 2008 data from the FAO but I also had to remove the 2007 and 2005 data which is completely different from the 2007 and 2005 data currently displayed on their website. Either we were badly vandalised or were reporting preliminary data or they recomputed or changed their definitions or ... At any rate our old data is not supported by the current data. Is there a need to report older data and how would we redesign the page layout to do that? (Also note that Belgium, Libya and Vietnam do not report wine production data.) Rmhermen (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update and old data purge

message: The data is outdated and hard to access, furthermore, I'm not sure that a link to a website's searchpage is a valid reference, and this PDF tells a different story. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 10:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: According to the Slovenian statistic department Slovenia produced 850,000 hectoliters of wine in season 2011/2012, thats about 85,000 metric tonnes of wine, so I don't know where FAO gets its data . User:Martinson90 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to investigate a similar case: FAO says Croatia produced 44,191 tons in 2012, yet the Croatian Bureau of Statistics says 1,293,000 hectoliters, which is roughly three times as much. In the Croatian case, there is a huge difference in FAO figures between 2004 and 2005 (197,900 vs 77,300 tons), which I suspect is a consequence of a change in methodology (rather than a real-life drop), so I suppose the way these figures are derived are different. The Croatian Bureau of Statistics says that "the industrial production and the production at private family farms are included". I wouldn't expect FAO to ignore private family farms, but maybe this would explain the difference. GregorB (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovenia 

message: Does anyone else see a problem with the fact that the article says the list is a top 40 list, but the list has 72 entries?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnapps17 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Entries