Talk:Jurassic Bark

message: It's episode number 58, not episode 61. Check episodes 51-60
:The episodes have two different possible orders, at this time they are listed by production order rather than broadcast order. Stardust8212 00:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: broadcast order is the only order that matters. episode could have been written 4 episodes in advance, but weren't aired or whatever reason. http://www.tv.com/futurama/jurassic-bark/episode/165480/summary.html This website also confirms that it is the 58th episode. So there's no reason to think otherwise. C. Pineda 07:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is it not worth making this distinction in the articles? I'm having difficulty pulling up examples (maybe The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya, but that's not really a fair comparison), but I've seen other Wikipedia articles that include both pieces of information. The currently listed season/episode number is completely useless for finding the episode online on any streaming service.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studentism (talk • contribs) 22:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

text: You find "Jurassic Bark" under episode 2 of season 5 now on Disney+. I think this article should reference the current order for people to find it. 2A02:3030:803:B059:5A86:166B:5985:8C29 (talk) 00:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We respect the wishes of the people who made the show, not how Disney chooses to list the episodes. See List of Futurama episodes for more information. DonIago (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Number 

message: Wandered back to Futurama after some years, and was trying to find Jurassic Bark. Realized the wiki has the production n not broadcast order of seasons/episodes.  Was wondering why that is? Usually articles use the functional option in these cases, IE an episode reference for people to use. Honestly, because so many other sites use wiki as their reference, makes it extremely difficult to find the episode you're looking for. As the broadcast version is equally accurate, is there any point to this other than snobbish refusal?
I plan to change it after this. Feel free to "correct" it if I'm wrong. Not doing every episode, just this one as it's the most searched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.7.53.82  (talk • contribs) 
:This would be better discussed at Talk:List of Futurama episodes, where I believe there are already existing threads regarding the rationale for using production order versus release order (I believe most particularly because production order is the creators' preferred order). Cheers. DonIago (talk) 17:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just curious 

message: , Okay, everybody knows that this is a common Internet meme. Knowyourmeme has an article about it, if you open Instagram even the Simpsons memes feature it, and so on. It's a well known fact, like the "shut up and take my money" meme that this is also a meme. Been around since 2002, check out Reddit and stuff. What sources do you require? --Whydoesitfeelsogood (talk) 03:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If everybody knows it, providing a reliable source should be quite easy to do, so why not provide one instead of disputing the need for one? DonIago (talk) 05:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fry hugging his dog 

message: In the "Reception" section, a number of sources list "Jurassic Bark" as either the best or one-of-the-best episodes of the series. It's rating on IMDB is the highest of any Futurama episode, and I imagine this is one of (if not the) most-searched episodes partly as a result of its notoriety. As such, it would make sense to populate that section in this manner with as many RS "rankings" as is reasonably possible. Right now the listing is in "prose" or "paragraph" form, however, when I attempted to research rankings to update the section, it turned out the episode was/is at the top of an absolute mountain of RS' lists, which would make inclusion in paragraph form a cumbersome read. Would anyone be interested in creating a more ergonomic listing (like a chart or simple spreadsheet) if I could provide a list of recent, RS links on the matter in addition to those already included? 24.151.103.37 (talk) 06:28, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: An accolades TABLE may be appropriate if the list is really that extensive. I'd check MOS:TV to see whether it offers any guidance on such before making any substantive changes though. DonIago (talk) 17:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Best of..." Lists