lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oulu

message: Oulu is now 5th biggest city of Finland by population droping Turku into rank 6. I tried to update https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Finnish_municipality/population_count_sequence and the page text, but to no avail. Someone with more ability with Wikipedia tech may be of help here. Puuska (talk) 15:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Population rank

message: I recalled a talltale of the possible connection of "Oulu" with the namesake of New York City, in part York may be a corruption of Oulu. After doing some of my research (provided by the Wikipedia articles themselves), New "York" was named for the Duke of York in York, England and the terminology "York" is from the Norsemen (Vikings) when they lived in the North Sea coasts of England in 850 AD. Whether or not there was a partial Finnish origin of "York" into the Scandinavian languages commonly spoken in the Bothnian coastline of Finland, the spelling Oulu may been misspelled "Yolle" in the Swedish Norse language of the middle ages. Indeed, Oulu stands for "flood water" in Finnish, but New York City sits on three islands and a peninsula (the Bronx). In the late 18th to early 20th centuries, New York city had a larger Swedish population than anywhere in the world outside Sweden and in the 1880's, the US census includes a large Finnish ethnic section in South Harlem, also known as "Yorkville" known to have many Swedish-Americans and German-Americans. Until the talltale is backed up with reliable sources available on the internet, I will not add it to the article even though it boosts a general interesting story on Oulu, Finland. +  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.2.206 (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to correct a statement you made, Oulu doesn't mean flood water in Finnish; actually, Oulu doesn't mean anything in Finnish. It is only speculated that the name might come from a Sami word meaning flood water. Otherwise, interesting claim.Ä Vinnis Persön (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oulu and New "York" connection? 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UN/LOCODE:FIOLU. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Kq-hit (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "UN/LOCODE:FIOLU" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Oulo. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 22#Oulo until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Jay (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Oulo" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: ...as European Capital of Culture for 2026 https://minedu.fi/en/capitalofculture2026 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.34.4.152 (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It has been just designed...
Talk:Harlequinade

message: We're missing an explanation of this character.  Isn't he part of a harlequinade, too? 78.148.108.201 (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been added.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pierrot 

message: The links for reference are all broken because the website was dismantled sometime after 2008.  Are there any more good places to add as references for more information?
98.125.59.121 (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gah!  The loss of the PeoplePlay site is a bad blow to many articles about 19th Century theatre.  I'll look for new links.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:18, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rummaged in the web and found some suitable stuff. Tim riley (talk) 12:49, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely done, Tim!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links for references 

message: Most of the adaptations etc listed in the article were nothing to do with the English harlequinade, but related to the original Commedia dell'arte characters. I have redrawn accordingly. Tim riley (talk) 12:49, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, good.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Adaptations
Talk:Harriet Tubman

message: After her injury, Tubman began experiencing visions and vivid dreams, which she interpreted as revelations from God.
Tubman experienced visions and vivid dreams, which she interpreted as revelations from God. 2605:A601:ADB6:A00:5C36:3147:E79A:63D3 (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't come across anyone doubting that Tubman's visions/dreams start after the injury. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure that is factual. But the poor wording implies something other than the actual subject of the article believed - that the visions were a result of the injury. The author is inserted personal opinion over the opinion of Tubman's own interpretation. Personal opinion of this type is unacceptable. 2605:A601:ADB6:A00:7DA3:EF7C:5A9A:8902 (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: First, we are not required to represent historical subjects according to their own self-perceptions, and generally we don't. Second, the sentence states a temporal relationship, not a causal one. Finally, the relating of these two things occurs in multiple published biographies of Tubman; the sentence is a representation of those sources, not something that has been inserted as the personal opinion of a Wikipedia editor. --RL0919 (talk) 07:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "After....began" implies visions were from head injury rather than her interpretation of it 

message: her timeline and her accompilshment 2600:8801:186:AC00:CCAB:D8EF:C01D:6405 (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harriet Tubman timeline 

message: She was a really good person because she helped slaves escape to freedom. She let them escape through the Underground Railroad and helped them escape without getting caught AT ALL!! She was called a abolisinest and heped people see slavery bas evil. 2601:283:4B01:EC60:4D16:367A:7B27:98BC (talk) 00:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How she was a really good person.
Talk:Jon Crosby

message: Birchtree, what is your reference for Michelle having been Crosby's girlfriend? The pages I've found just say she was a girl he wanted to impress, which doesn't quite amount to the same thing. I've reworded it, but if you have a reference for the allegation, please feel free to put it back in. (Hmm. Why aren't I doing something useful instead of talking about such random things?) -- Oliver P. 16:24 Mar 16, 2003 (UTC)
This article needs some pictures of Jon. Most of his music videos feature him as a slim young man, and I was suprised when I went to his recent Chicago show and found him more portly and sporting a beard. Both ages should probably have pictures. Bchabala2 04:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The tone of this article is way too informal. I've replaced all references to "Jon" (per the Manual of Style) but it remains unsourced and too informal sounding for an encyclopedia. — Lincolnite (talk) 08:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Jon's produced a lot of new material lately: the five Generica albums, and this new Bang Band SiXXX thing. Those should be added to the article. Tredanse (talk) 12:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New stuff
Talk:James Petrillo

message: I don't know if Petrillo coined the slogan,
"Help keep music alive––insist on live musicians,"
but it's a phrase that entered my consciousness when he
was in office.  And it's still relevant.
See, for example, www.buglesacrossamerica.org for what
motivates that organization. 
Jjanzenphd (talk) 22:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... – insist on live musicians." 

message: If someone could add it.
I would be most grateful.
As far as I know the picture is public domain and no one owns the rights to it. 
https://i.imgur.com/ZuY2UOy.png  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BC77:4CC0:BDBB:7D2A:F28E:CD8F (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... – I have a picture of Mr Petrillo." 

message: This article says that Petrillo was ousted from the union for opposing integration. That may be so, but it should be followed up with the information that in 1966 he was back working for the union, and his job was to promote integration of various locals around the country, according to the NYT, April 23, 1966. https://www.nytimes.com/1966/04/23/archives/petrillo-quietly-battles-musicians-segregation.html Corrado1940 (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petrillo and Segregation
Talk:Heligoland

message: I don't see any mountains and a long hike would seem to involve several laps around the island.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.220.82.210 (talk) 05:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please reread the paragraph.--Quisqualis (talk) 10:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   "He and Bohr went for long hikes in the mountains" 

message: Pinneberg is a typical half sub metropolitain / half rural tree farming area . can' t tell they actually have any kind of stand out culture to speak of other than typicsl general northern sticks and suburban closer to HH.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.186.168.137 (talk) 22:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding culture

message: Cunliffe 2002 :148-149 adds several other ancient names for the Island:
Xenophon called it Balcia, but Basilia by Pytheas and Timeaeus, and Basileia by Diodorus. And possibly Baunonia.  The Greek adjective basileia means "royal."  But why?
The Celtic speakers may have called the Island Abalus, which Pytheas wrote as Abalum.  Celtic aball  = 'apple'.  But that is just a guess.
Cunliffe called the Island the Amber Island. He thought that this was the trading port where amber was brought from the Jutland Peninsula by local amber hunters to sell to traders from the south, either Carthaginians or Greeks, or both.
Ref: Barry Cunliffe "The Extraordinary Voyage of Pytheas the Greek, Penguin Books, 2002: 148-149 Ordnørd (talk) 02:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-History of the Island(s) 

message: Just noting that there is coverage of the etymology in the Name section, but then again - and slightly different - in the History section. Can someone more qualified than me fix this? Davidships (talk) 02:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: This is a picture of the youth hostel I took in July 1975. If anyone wants to add it to the article, that would be fine with me: . Gah4 (talk) 08:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hostel
Talk:UseModWiki

message: The domain usemod.com appears to be squatted, very recently -- I was browsing the site last week, but today it loads park.js from sedoparking.com.  Is the project dead or did the owner just fumble a domain renewal? TTK (talk) 20:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I accidentally found that it has been moved to usemod.org in September 2023 without any notice. I am not sure about if it happened purposely, or the site owner suddenly lost the original domain.  🐱💬 08:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  usemod.com 

message: In this article, CVWiki is denoted as CvWiki, but official name should be CVWiki whose V is capitalized. AkiGoto (talk) 02:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. AkiGoto (talk) 00:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CVWiki 

message: WP:NOTCHANGELOG says the following:
The sources in the version history of this article were neither reliable nor third-party. All of them were self-published/official. This is insufficient to persist them here. That is why they were removed and should not be reinstated until such sources can be identified. Izno (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version histories
Talk:Spectra (poetry collection)

message: There's a suspiciously similar review on Amazon for The Spectra Hoax, dating from 2001 (where as this text dates from 2003). However User:Ihcoyc, who wrote the bulk of text, says on his user page that he is Steve Gustafson, and the Amazon review is written by S. Gustafson.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC
::True, this article is a replica of the Amazon review. Perhaps an attempt at a metahoax, but to be a killjoy, I will make some revisions and citations to reputable sources. —Zujine|talk 00:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon review 

message: I've updated the article, removed all the Amazon content, and added in multiple sources. I think the edits were sufficient to remove the tags at the top of the article.
—Zujine|talk 01:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated with sources 
Talk:Condom

message: The male condom is rolled onto an erect penis before intercourse and works by forming a physical barrier which blocks semen from entering the body of a sexual partner. Male condoms are typically made from latex and, less commonly, from polyurethane, polyisoprene, or lamb intestine. Male condoms have the advantages of ease of use, ease of access, and few side effects. Individuals with a latex allergy should use condoms made from a material other than latex, such as polyurethane. 2001:8003:2352:1300:C79:E317:9969:F8F8 (talk) 11:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 17:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2022 

message: Hi all, I would like to propose that this page be renamed to "Condom (External)" to make it clear which type of condom this article focuses on.  I am making a similar suggestion that the page currently titled "Female condom" be renamed to "Internal Condom".  These terms (internal and external) are more medically accurate than male and female, since these devices can be utilized by all genders and sexes.  In conjunction with this, I would plan to adjust wording within this article to predominantly use the terms internal and external.  I am happy to explain this point further if there are any questions.  Willmskinner (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternately, we could leave the title as is, and increase the size and scope of the Internal Condom section...  Willmskinner (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming to Condom (External)
Talk:Adversary system

message: I read the article again and it seems in dire need of a reorganization... David.Monniaux 17:23, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: It is questionable that the results would be different if cases were conducted under the differing approaches; in fact no statistics exist that can show that these systems do not come to the same result. 
Seems like a strange use of a double negative. Are there any statistics/anecdotes which compare the systems in any fashion, concluding any of same, different or uncomparible results? I would imagine that there are few cases which are tried once each in both systems to base such a comparison on, and even then, any differences in law would likely be the deciding factor, rather than advasarial/inquisitory differences.
no statistics exist that can show that these systems do not come to the same result
to me means the same thing as
no statistics exist that can show that these systems come to the same result
and thus is probably meaningless. 128.104.114.136 21:57, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal System Comparisons
Talk:Howard Hughes

message: I have removed the "status" that this was a failed GAC, as there does not appear to have ever been a GA review.  Sock edit.1. — Maile  (talk) 14:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA 

message: When I posted my recent edits, I forgot to specify that they contain self-authored text copied from version 1104716775 of Hughes D-2 and version 1104243699 of Hughes XF-11. Carguychris (talk) 19:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent edits to the D-2 and XF-11 sections 

message: Paragraph 9 mentions “F-11” which I believe should read “XF-11” 2600:1700:120:A630:71E2:FB2A:2A8A:5E6F (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should, and I've corrected it. F-11 properly refers to the intended production version, none of which were built. Carguychris (talk) 04:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Life section 

message: How is there nothing in this article about the 1947 hearings with the Senate Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program? 72.78.149.143 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congressional Hearings 

message: There is a sentence in the article that alleges that Hughes had 'brain trauma' from neurosyphilis diagnosed in 1932, which is indeed something that was reported on in their source, but autopsy showed that Hughes had never suffered from syphilis and with his history of medical treatment, he would have been cured of syphilis by the nature of the treatment. It is lazy to report that Hughes had syphilis-induced brain damage when there is no evidence to indicate as such 2A02:C7C:4698:F800:39E3:8C19:2B33:D76C (talk) 11:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source for your claim? DuncanHill (talk) 12:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - the source is already cited on the page c[61] vs. c[161]. It is fine to report that Brown and Broeske's 1996 biography reports that he was diagnosed with neurosyphilis in 1932, but it is not fine to say that his actions were a result of brain trauma caused by neurosyphilis. Brown and Boeske's book is a non-medical biography and Tennant's (2007) article is specifically pre-occupied with reviewing the medical evidence, presents a medical history post-penicillin that would have cured him of syphilis and brain autopsy results that show no evidence of syphilitic lesions. 2A02:C7C:4698:F800:39E3:8C19:2B33:D76C (talk) 12:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neurosyphilis
Talk:East Turkestan

message: The whole article seems like it was written by a non-native speaker and it tilts heavily toward Beijing's interests. Jsensiba (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the things written in the article are supported by sources so there's no problem unless there is other information that isn't present AAAAA143222 (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased Heavily Toward Beijing 

message: The topic of East Turkestan discusses the use of this term within its Current status section, and I don't think that we have enough here to warrant two separate articles. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Uyghuristan]] into [[East Turkestan]] 

message: A document found in 1969 Astana, Turfan, which later named as Documents on the Sogdian Slave Trade during the Gochang period of the Koji clan (Japanese: 麹氏高昌国時代ソグド文女奴隷売買文書)[12][13] shows that in 639, the name Turkistan was used as this name of this land in the Sogdian word "twrkstn"[14][1]
the Wikipedia of "Turkestan" has same passage, and the modern term "East Turkestan" is not exactly equivalent to the medieval "Turkestan", this is a very controversial topic, the the Turkestan here apparently referring to the Mongolian Plateau or the Transoxiana, not the modern Tarim Basin, an area where the main ethnic groups are Eastern Iranian-speaking groups rather than Turkic-speaking groups at that time.some Chinese scholars even believe that this term isn’t word “Turkestan”. 王丁.粟特语高昌延相买婢契补考[J].国学学刊,2022,No.55(03):109-114+141.
It is unreasonable and misleading to directly state such a highly controversial topic as "the name Turkistan was used as this name of this land in the Sogdian word "twrkstn"",. 浅薄的 (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree AAAAA143222 (talk) 00:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the cited sources, which do not refer specifically here and actually explicitly refer to other areas (e.g.  from p.15 of this cited document). I have removed the contested part unless better well-referenced evidence can be provided. — MarkH21talk 17:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Etymology part is clearly wrong
Talk:Case role

message: I suspect that "natural language processing" means something done with computers.  If so, the article should say so, so that people like me won't have to suspect.  I have seen the words "agent" and "patient" used in linguistics as it developed long before computers existed, and of course everone has heard of "nominative case", "accusative case", etc., when they studied grammar.  So I suspect that this is yet another case of software experts thinking something that existed 200 or 2000 years before computers existed was invented by software experts.  I've seen this in regard to, for example, mathematical induction (a standard part of high-school math long before computers were around), lattice theory (introduced in the 19th century), and even Euclid's algorithm.  I will be pleased if I am wrong in this suspicion.  Michael Hardy 23:00 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC)
Patient is about the medical use of the word.  Is there a linguistic meaning beyond a dictionary definition?  If so, disambiguation is necessary. Tuf-Kat
: IEEE SUMO describes it as follows... is this text free of copyright restrictions? 
:: SUMO property patient: instance of CaseRole; ( patient ?PROCESS ?ENTITY ) means that ?ENTITY is a participant in ?PROCESS that may be moved, said, experienced, etc. For example, the direct objects in the sentences 'The cat swallowed the canary' and 'Billy likes the beer' would be examples of patients. Note that the patient of a Process may or may not undergo structural change as a result of the Process. The CaseRole of patient is used when one wants to specify as broadly as possible the object of a Process.
: the ontology is merged from a set of more specialized ontologies, the owners of which have filed copyright disclaimers for the respective components; if IEEE were to make claims, wouldn't this defeat the purpose of SUMO?
These are very distinct. Suggest use of Patient (linguistic semantics) or Patient (knowledge represenation)
----
I still suspect that this is not a well-written article as it stands.  Why does it say "in English", to the exclusion of other languages?  Is something particularly different about English?  German, Russian, and Greek make explicit case distinctions in forms of nouns; English does not.  What does "spatially distinguished" mean?  I think of nominative, accusative, dative, etc. as syntactic roles; how are they "spatially distinguished"?  Michael Hardy 01:17 Mar 19, 2003 (UTC)
: 'in english' has no business being there. and case role's are not about syntax, they provide hooks into the semantics. the wording spatially distinguished comes from SUMO.
: "spatially distinguished" means they're not in the same space.. they are apart from each other, although they may touch one another. 216.130.212.63 00:19, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Vi.gomez (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related References