lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ruger Mini-14

message: The link for citation 2 is dead Marthfox6040 (talk) 10:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure which ref you meant, as #2 didn't actually have a hyperlink, but it was also one of multiple refs citing the same book, so I have combined them (which does include a link now). I hope this is what you were suggesting. - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He was referring to the first of two refs I removed in this edit (on account of being self-published web forums), so I guess we don't need to worry about it being a dead link anymore. Loafiewa (talk) 20:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 2 

message: I was in Belfast in 1999 and observed two RUC officers with Mini-14GBs.  I am quite familiar with the Mini-14, and was close enough that there was absolutely no doubt that these were Mini-14s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.166.51 (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's great to hear, but unfortunately, your word is not exactly a reliable source. You wouldn't happen to have any newspaper articles, etc. to back this up? - Adolphus79 (talk) 01:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RUC was still using at least some of these rifles post-1995 

message: Requesting citation here due to COI.
Last sentence under Ruger_Mini-14#AC-556, suggesting this citation as proof that the AC-556 is still circulating on the civilian NFA market (item #20 on source's list):
"By that time, some models became available for private civilian purchase in the NFA market." LoVeloDogs (talk) 22:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested reference for AC-556 as NFA on civilian market
Category talk:Family Guy characters

message: This category has been tagged for clean-up.  It seems that the regular and fictional characters on Family Guy have been outnumbered by links to the articles for celebrities that the show parodies.  I think that this category can be cleaned-up by removing those celebrities that may have had a small cameo on Family Guy, but no actual regular recurring character.  In the alternative, a new category could be created, along the lines of "Celebrities parodied in Family Guy."  I appreciate any insight, advice, perspecitives, or alternatives anyone else could provide.danntm 23:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up the category
Talk:Sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome

message: I thought this was nonsense, but quick check of PubMed does show use of expession "sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome". So:
* this redirection is misnamed ?
* is this just not another way of expressing Sleep apnea ?
* should it not redirect to sleep apnea rather than apnea ?
David Ruben  Talk  23:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think PubMed is not the only scientific reference. You can see other places :
* http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10893080&dopt=Abstract (this is a goverment public health place):
* http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11587974&dopt=abstract (hey, this is a PubMed) !!!!!!!!!!!!
* and a lot of other links --Mac 06:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be an alternative name for OSAS. A redirect to sleep apnea is the best solution. JFW | T@lk 07:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong spelling !
Talk:Asterids

message: So, uh, what are the actual key cladogram-type characteristics that make the asterids different from the rosids? Stan 00:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Isn't it essentially the same with Hutchinson's metachlamydae? Should we mention that?--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metachlamydae 

message: The sentence beginning "common examples" has plants noted as food crops, ornamentals, and teak. But it didn't appear to include *anything* from the huge family Asteraceae, which is a major portion of the Asterales. So I wondered about a good example of a plant in Asteraceae. I picked the common sunflower, which is grown as a crop. The text would read more smoothly if I just said "sunflowers"; however, some plants called "sunflowers" aren't in Asteraceae. Therefore, my wording is a little awkward. I thought about daisy, but while many notable daisies are in Asteraceae, there are a few flowers that aren't. Maybe someone can think of a better example -- a plant that's widely known, where all of the common names are plants within Asteraceae; or at least all of the common names which are important enough to include in Wikipedia. Oaklandguy (talk) 05:35, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thistle and lettuce are names applied outside of Asteraceae as well. You could go for the type genus (Michaelmas daisy). There's also dandelion, groundsel, goldenrod, hawkweed and so on. Lavateraguy (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common examples: There should be one from Asteraceae -- here's what I added & why
Talk:Railroad worm

message: The difficult to find railroad worm is named for the green bioluminescent pattern on the underside of the caterpillar.  There is some variation, but the rail & tie pattern is produced by abdominal transverse inter-segment stripes, lateral segment stripes, and leg ('knee') dots.  The railroad worm in the Appalachian mountains lights a rich blue-green, somewhat darker than the pale yellow-green of the Appalachian fire-fly.
<BR>Wikidity (talk) 19:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are they worldwide? Semitones (talk) 04:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  where do they live?
Category talk:Buddhist mythology

message: What does "Buddhist mythology" mean in this context? If we assume that "mythology" is meant to be value-neutral (rather than derisive, which is also a common sense), then it seems to me that all religious ideas are basically mythological. That being the case "Buddhist mythology" would be redundant. I suggest that this category should, instead, be used for various cultural ideas that have accreted to Buddhism but that don't have particular religious significance by themselves, such as Naree Pons or Sanzu River. I don't think that Buddha or bodhisattva should be included in this category. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 00:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mythology"
Talk:Duke Droese

message: On here it says he was born in October, but here it says he was born in August 1969--Mjs1991 (talk) 07:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: It appears saying this was 1992 is incorrect. The actual Top 500 for 1992 doesn't list Duke at #500 - it lists a named Morgus the Maniac. The list for 1993 does list a "Garbage Man" as #500 though. 68.107.237.34 (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PWI 500 
Talk:Narón

message: I feel this is a more accurate version of Narón as opposed to Naron, as this is the correct Spanish spelling. The Naron page will need re-reading and checking and would expand the Narón article excellently. 
Istabo 00:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section on fiestas leaves me wanting more. Does anybody know anything about them? What do the people do, how do they celebrate, what are the purposes of the days? --Sean Lotz 01:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on fiestas 

message: Narón gps position is wrong. The correct answer is:
Coordinates: 43 ° 30'3 .54 "N 8 ° 11'32 .33" W  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.165.244.213 (talk) 23:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  gps position
Talk:Blue World Order

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: The Spinoffs and parodies section of the New World Order (professional wrestling) article goes into very deep detail on bWo, yet the bWo article skips all sorts of these important notes.  I'm going to condense the details in the nWo article and do a straight copy & paste of the original content for anyone that wants to preserve anything else by adding into this article. Here's the original content:
Stevie Richards', Nova's and The Blue Meanie's answer to the nWo in ECW, the group was a parody of the nWo, and its primary colors were blue and white. Stevie was "Big Stevie Cool" (a parody of Nash's nickname "Big Daddy Cool"), Meanie was "Da Blue Guy" (a parody of Hall's nickname "Da Bad Guy"), and Nova was "Hollywood Nova" (a parody of Hogan's new nickname, "Hollywood Hogan"). Members of the Japanese faction Kaientai-DX (Dick Togo, Men's Teioh and TAKA Michinoku) were briefly associated with the group. (Note; When the bWo, along with the rest of ECW, made a guest appearance on Monday Night Raw, Vince McMahon was reluctant to say what the bWo was a parody of, claiming on air that the nWo was a "clothing line".) On July 7th, 2005, the bWo reunited once again this time to confront JBL. The bWo's last appearance was on July 24, 2005, in the undercard of the WWE's Great American Bash PPV in a match against The Mexicools (Juventud Guerrera, Super Crazy, and Psicosis). Cale 03:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Many Details in nWo and Too Little in bWo 

message: The part about the bWo in TNA Wrestling seems suspicious to me as it was added by an anonymous IP and is not sourced.  Can anyone find any credible source that reflects that section of the article?  --Molotovnight (talk) 03:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNA Wrestling? 

message: chikara have had trailers, saying that the band is coming, alot of people think that this may be bWo, as they are a spoof and Chik's a comedy wrestling company, this seems to be backed by the fact that Kevin Nash was in the rumble, wut do? -- 94.10.122.25 (talk) 20:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chikara
Talk:Golden line

message: This term is ambiguous. Do you mean "American Latin classrooms," "English and American Latin classrooms", or what?  --Thanks Iggle 00:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think more academic researches are needed to construct the topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GivemeAnamePlz (talk • contribs) 05:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglo-American

message: Is the quotation from Burles correctly quoted? The quotation says the first adjective agrees with the first noun, and the second adjective agrees with the second noun. The two Latin examples that follow actually show the first adjective agreeing with the second noun and the second adjective agreeing with the first noun – which is the usual understanding of what a golden line is. EEye (talk) 10:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't seem right. In both Burles' examples, the first adjective agrees with the first noun, as he says. Kanjuzi (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Category talk:Music from the Niagara Region

message: The Niagara Region hardly qualifies as an important enough centre of Canadian music to warrant its own dedicated "music from Niagara" category; there isn't even a special "Music from Toronto" category, and the Toronto scene is a vastly larger percentage of the Canadian music industry than Niagara is. Bearcat 00:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This category is an anomaly, therefore is being split into :Category:Niagara Region musical groups (for bands) and :Category:Niagara Region musicians (for people), which is more consistent with the existing general category patterns. Dl2000 (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting
Talk:Minyas (mythology)

message: Shouldn't the two different Minyas be two different articles BauerPower 00:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. I might start one today (also Epigoni (epic)). Unless you do them first ... Andrew Dalby 09:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:3rd Maryland Regiment

message: FWIW, there's a new article on the 3rd Maryland flag.  Even though the story connecting the design to the 3rd Maryland Regt is no longer believed, the flag still bears the name.
Mingusboodle (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd Maryland Flag
Talk:Trapt (video game)

message: I have finished a copyedit and removed the tag.  I think this article needs more content from somebody that has actually played the game.  Also I think that a section on the games reception in the gaming community would be a good addition with references to its scores in reveiws.
Noosentaal (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 

message: I removed the "Reception" section, because only X-Play's review was listed, in less than five words, literally. I watched the X-Play review and it was extremely biased and untruthful (adding sound effects that aren't actually in the game to make it seem less serious, showing the only two times in the game where enemy dialogue was incoherently translated and referencing it as being the norm, and saying the plot is impossible to follow when detailed plot descriptions are given during every loading screen which are well-written enough that my five-year-old nephew was able to keep up with the storyline, among other things). If someone wants to add a "Reception" section, add more than one score. X-Play does not represent the entire gaming community's reception to a game, and thus the section was totally inaccurate as it was, not taking into account the ridiculous slant they put on the game. 74.79.5.19 (talk) 03:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Congratulations Trapt editors, we've made this article "Start Class".  Keep up the good work! -Noosentaal·talk· 09:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations
Talk:Alaa Mubarak

message: Are there any health crises that lead to death that aren't "severe"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.73.186 (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "severe health crisis" 

message: Interesting that he doesn't use his full first name, probably because it's traditionally transliterated into English as "Aladdin".76.255.29.99 (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's his magic lamp?
Talk:Most common nouns in English

message: This list doesnt seem right. How can 'war' be on the list, and not something like 'food'.
And 'cell' at 112? Yeah that's a word I use all the time. IN THE FUTURE, when food comes in cells and batteries are a matter of life and death.
Please show sources.
----
I agree with the above... "colony", "continent", and "slave" are all on the list, while things like "food", "bread", and "box" are not; sources definitely need to be cited.
Gzabers 01:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tum Yeto

message: I don't really know what inspired me to make this page, other than that "Tum Yeto" is a funny name and that it is a well-known skateboard distributor.  I'll add more stuff once I find more information about it.  As with all Wikipedia sites, feel free to make any changes or additions that you feel fit; I would love to see more information added to this site! --Nichenbach 00:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Tum Yeto" is definitely one of the long-term, well-established and notable brands in world skateboarding. I think it is definitely appropriate to remove the Notability template—I will wait a week or so and see what others think.--Soulparadox (talk) 04:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lyle Neff

message: Ironically, wikified by an American (who likes Candadians). Stepp-Wulf 00:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glutamate transporter

message: Use the ref-tag! Example: author, paper, year etc.
Would someone adjust the table to show alternate names for the EAATs?  
EAAT1=GLAST (Glutamate aspartate transporter)<P>
EAAT2=GLT1 (glutamate transporter 1)<P>
EAAT3=EAAC1 (neuronal versus astrocyte transporter)<P>
*cite: <P>
:(I'm just adding the names, and the above citation) I haven't read enough of the article to know where that citation might fit into the article though. Jimw338 (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Unigned comments

message: I went through all the entries in this NCBI gene search and found that there's 2 transporters (technically, only 1 notable transporter) that's not covered in the lead at the moment. xCT (SLC7A11) is a transporter which is primarily involved in the transport of cysteine anions and glutamate (NCBI gene entry for xCT). Sialin (SLC17A5) is a transporter that is primarily involved in the transport of sialic acids which appears to also transport glutamate and aspartate into synaptic vesicles in the hippocampus ( - NCBI gene entry for sialin). 
I have 3 questions for you:
#I think xCT should be added to the table of proteins and be covered in the lead. However, since it's a member of SLC7, it belongs to a different solute carrier subfamily than EAATs (SLC1) and VGLUTs (SLC17), so should I state that this protein belongs to a 3rd subclass of glutamate transporters?
#Should sialin be mentioned in this article?  It doesn't really seem that notable since glutamate/aspartate transport isn't covered in much detail in the NCBI gene entry, but it does perform the same function as VGLUTs and belongs to the same solute carrier subfamily as them (SLC17).
#Unrelated question: should we move the Glutamate transporter#VGluT3 section to VGLUT3? It seems more appropriate there. 
Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 23:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  xCT ([[SLC7A11]]) and sialin ([[SLC17A5]])
Talk:Castle Rock (Kansas)

message: I think Castle Rock, Kansas should be merged here (primarily because this article's name is more appropriate) --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and done. Feel free to fix it up further.  Nationalparks 01:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:John Sherman (disambiguation)

message: ----
In evaluating the relative notability of the politician, it would be an error to be swayed by the roughly 175 lks to the politician.  It must be noted that his name appears in 3 very widely used templates.--Jerzy•t 01:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it'd be nice if you fixed those three templates rather than just noting it here (and that's not to mention all the several dozen other links that are not related to the templates). older ≠ wiser 01:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Err, I didn't say the templates were "bad"--only that you broke them when you moved the page and did not fix the templates to link to the correct person. That is just common courtesy when moving a page and has nothing to do with one's level of interest in a topic. older ≠ wiser 13:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmmm. I had thought you were a fairly reasonable contributor. However, it appears you may have tipped over to the dark side. You are quite correct that linking through a single redirect is not a problem. However, that is not what I was complaining about. The links to this page are NOT to a redirect, they are to a disambiguation page. Perhaps this difference is not obvious to you. A redirect occurs automatically. By merely moving this page and not fixing the links still pointing to it, you demonstrate a lack of consideration for the readers. Sorry, but that's the way it is. Period. older ≠ wiser 19:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

message: It seems to be that one of these Shermans, the Senator, is far more well-known than the others.  I think "John Sherman" ought to direct to his article, with this one being moved to "John Sherman (disambiguation)".  Anyone have any thoughts on this idea?  --Coemgenus (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig
Talk:United States Southern Command

message: Is the head of Southern Command given or is the government in the process of deciding on a new one? I ask because I can't find a link to the general or admiral in charge. Monksbane 4:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: USNORTHCOM
"Significant changes made by UCP 2008 include:
- Realigning the USNORTHCOM and U.S. Southern Command areas of responsibility (AOR) by placing the Bahamas, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the Turks and Caicos Islands in the USNORTHCOM AOR.
"
CaribDigita (talk) 21:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ths USA = moving more nations from south to Northcommand? 

message: I've slapped an NPOV template onto this page, because it's very imbalanced and biased towards SOUTHCOM/the US military. Most of the (few) sources are in fact affiliated with the US military, and I find it strange that, one the one hand, there's a rather long and praising section called "Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief" while on the other hand, in the History section, the entire period 1963-1996 is missing (!). Qwertyus (talk) 10:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV, history missing 

message: "USSOUTHCOM is a joint command[1] of more than 1,200 military and civilian personnel representing the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and several other federal agencies." This seems a bit low? Mcsteez (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed, but not for any of these reasons. The center is under the NDU and not SOUTHCOM, as was erroneously stated.Garuda28 (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel numbers 

message: This sentence from the intro seems unjustified: "As explained below, USSOUTHCOM has been under scrutiny due to several human rights and rule of law controversies in which it has been embroiled for nearly a decade." The only mention of rule-of-law and human-rights violations were not about USSOUTHCOM. The only controversy I could find was about the soldiers who got prostitutes. I recommend removal. Jess_Riedel (talk) 03:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and done. - wolf 07:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversies"?
Talk:Freerunning

message: It says Freerunning "is a discipline that was create to be a more inclusive form of parkour" and then it says "freerunning is a type of parkour that includes tricking". These don't sound like the same thing. If we are talking about the same word being applied to two different things, it needs to specify: "freerunning can refer to a discipline created to be a more inclusive form of parkour, or it can refer to a style of parkour including elements of tricking". If they aren't two different things, it shoudl be rephrased, because it's not obvious what is being said to a reader who doens't know much about about any of it...which is exactly the person these articles ought to be written for.70.109.132.119 (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: There should be a section on differences between those two. To a casual reader, like myself, those two seem like the same thing. Like parkour is freerunnig but with a copyright name to make money of off already existing thing. 213.149.62.88 (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freerunning vs. Parkour 

message: The introduction currently says that freerunning was invented by Rory Allen, but the history section tells a completely different story. I myself know nothing about it, but it would be great if someone who does could reconcile the differences. 95.90.232.49 (talk) 09:35, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins 

message: Xyxyzyz (talk) 02:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injuries and Deaths  

message: * In August 2019 a person had been jumping across consecutive roof edges when they came across the path of a wire blocking the way and began balancing on top of it over the side of a 25 story building. A second person came over and pulled them back onto the ledge. They received minor burns from the electrical wire.
Xyxyzyz (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2019