lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Devil in the White City

message: Shouldn't some mention of the 45 minute 2007 National Geographic special adapted from this book entitled "Madness In The White City" be mentioned under Film (and TV) Adaptations?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.212.141.160 (talk) 01:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, someone, specifically some editor who knows ... well, something beyond what this IP user has revealed, including a WP:RS, described adequately for users to access it for authentication in place of ‘Net rumor.--JerzyA (talk) 01:45, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Thank you for mentioning this; I added a line about it under Adaptations with an article from the Chicago Tribune as a source. Lathe Foundation (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madness In The White City 

message: Should the critiques about the historical accuracy of the text be mentioned? At least two history professors I have found noted some of the embellishments in the text shortly after it was published.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSU ENG PROF (talk • contribs) 21:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a good idea. I think it could warrant its own section depending on how much is written about it. Otherwise it could go in the Reception section, which could use some more structure anyway. If you have some reliable sources to share please do. Lathe Foundation (talk) 17:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention critiques about historical accuracy?

message: — Assignment last updated by Stormtrooper2187 (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: American Studies 101
Talk:Gulf (disambiguation)

message: are there any gulfs in europe 21:42, 6 September 2006‎ User:68.66.190.41
"A gulf or bay is a part of a lake or ocean that extends so that it is surrounded by land on three sides" -- not true for the Gulf of Maine, nor a number of other gulfs I can think of.
Also, gulfs in Europe:  Gulf of Cadiz, Gulf of Bothnia, Gulf of Finland.. etc.  (and BTW, the Gulf of Cadiz is not surrounded by land on three sides.  Just saying.) Pfly 21:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gulfs in Europe?

message: On the wiki page for Gulf of Mexico, it is claimed to be the ninth largest, but on this page it says the tenth. Evanturner (talk) 01:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulf of Mexico size
Talk:Asuran characters in Stargate

message: wouldnt oberoth have been born on atlantis? -Xornok 00:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the Ancient nanite experiment took place on Asuras. The entry in Atlantis' database mentioned a small research outpost on Asuras after all. Maartentje 07:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  birthplace 

message: shouldnt it be "is" and not "was"? -Xornok 02:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His status is unknown at the time, so we should maybe just leave it alone... However, he will be mentioned in the upcoming Atlantis ep The Return, Part 2, so maybe we should just wait til then... Maartentje 12:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well, he was very much alive at the end of progeny, he blinked, i believe... and since he doesnt need air to breathe, he may still be alive... -Xornok 19:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tense 

message: Why is it that no Asuran character appears in more than a few episodes? I would like to see a recurring villian rather than the race as a collective being the villains. I thought that Oberoth was going to come back because all their knowledge is merged/shared but I guess they don't do that in that way.
Also, why are Cetus and Talus considered "major characters" exactly? They hardly had any speaking parts and their names weren't even given onscreen. Can anyone explain that?
Also, is it just me or did the Asurans in "The Return, Pt. 2" look like Turtles with those weird uniforms. Are they some sort of battle uniforms or what?
Faris b 08:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do they all die? 
Talk:Edward John Carnell

message: The original author of this article has written that Carnell's "combinationalist" or "verificationist" apologetic methods had an influence on Francis Schaeffer. Subsequently in the Apologetics section of the Francis Schaeffer article Schaeffer is called a combinationalist or verificationist, when Schaeffer himself describes his apologetics as both presuppositionalist and evidentialist. Therefore a cite is requested for this statement of fact. Thank you :-) --Awinger48 21:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Apologetic Writings: Influence on Francis Schaeffer
Talk:House Party at Boothy's

message: Mentioning its debut is above Robbie Williams is not very constructive these days with the charts as they are - LMT's single was released on all formats, and Robbie Williams' single has charted on its initial downloads only - it will no doubt peak higher next week when the physical single is released. 21:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Likewise with Muse --M2Ys4U (talk) 22:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't own the CD single, but I know it has a map pointing to the location of Boothy's house. Should it be noted then that the address in the song (1B Lydgate Lane) doesn't actually exist, and although Boothy may live on that street it isn't at that address? It's been a while since I've walked up there but I'm fairly sure the numbers on Lydgate Lane start at 12, perhaps someone can back me up on this? --86.136.68.44 (talk) 18:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Address
Talk:Ranks and insignia of St John Ambulance (England)

message: removed all inaccurate information 144.98.76.45 (talk) 19:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate information

message: I'de like to see other SJA organizations add in their rank schemes; this should be a single page with all countries on it.  Joezasada 21:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Organisations

message: I wonder if anyone could correct the broken images that currently show. It looks like the & in the pictures is what is causing problems, if there is a way to change those & to the word AND it may correct the issue. However, I am not sure on how to correct that. Medic3348 17:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting Rank Pictures 

message: After playing around with the images a bit, I was able to isolate the issue (The Ampersand symbol "&") and re-uploaded images to files that work. Testing confirmed that it works Medic3348 18:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected 

message: The England structure is looking a bit worse for wear. I've corrected the grades as follows: 
- One pip = Grade 6
- Two pips = Grade 5
- Three pips = Grade 4
- One Crown = Grade 3
- One Crown, One pip = Grade 2
- One Crown, Two pips = Grade 1
However im unable to upload images as im a new user, and the grades 2 and 5 images are totally missing. Can someone correct this, as i dont know how! Jrooney (talk) 13:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank Slide Pictures, and England's Structure 

message: The line-up with the army ranks vs. English ranks isn't quite right. Deputy or Assistant Commissioner should be the same as Grade 1 = Colonel. Grade 2 = Lt Col. Grade 3 = Major. Grade 4 = Captain. Grade 5 = Lt. Grade 6 = 2nd Lt. You could go a lot higher and start looking above Commissioner grade; national officers such as Chief Officers and the like have equivalent grades. However, the comparisons drawn are arbitrary - how many Brigadiers does the army have compared to how many Commissioners SJA have?!Jungle expat (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alignment with army-equivalent ranks 

message: In the process of updating to reflect the new "simplified" rank structure; template changes to come later --SunsetTapestryBaboon (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Sunset - unfortunately you do need to cite a reliable source when you add information to Wikipedia, so we can verify it is true. As you didn't do this, I'm afraid I've had to revert your addition. Thanks for contributions, and if you have any questions please drop a note on my talk page. Thanks, Acather96 (click here to contact me) 16:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-edited with proper sources, also created a new template that can be switched to when the new system gets rolled out properly. --SunsetTapestryBaboon (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks great - thanks for your work. I'll try and work on this article too in a bit. :) Acather96 (click here to contact me) 22:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dec2013-Mar2014 rank structure changes
Talk:Blairism

message: It's entirely unacceptable that we're naming someone a "blairite" (or a brownite, a thatcherite, a scargilite, or a selenite) without multiple reliable sources. I don't doubt that such sources can be found for most of these people, but right now the list of people is an unsourced synthesis with no reliable sources or objective criteria for inclusion or exclusion. -- Finlay McWalter • Talk 21:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP and naming "blairites" without reliable sources

message: The list of Blairites is largely bunk. It contains several figures who definitely are not Blairites, along with dozens of names with no source to back up their inclusion. I see 'Blairism' as vaguely defined, therefore dubbing figures (especially post-2010 figures) as 'Blarities' is always going to be contentious. Perhaps incorporate several key figures into the main text instead. -- Hazhk (talk) 15:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be removed, it is a pretty meaningless and tendentious list, as users have noted. 'Blairite' is a pejorative anyway now, rightly or wrongly, so the list is likely to be the subject of unsourcable point scoring. Philip Cross (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing list 

message: Croydon CLP recently banned the term 'Blairite' source:https://insidecroydon.com/2016/08/03/croydon-labour-meeting-bans-the-use-of-the-word-blairite/ I was wondering whether this was relevant to the article at hand and whether it shows the term as being negative. Sata1991 (talk) 14:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croydon CLP banning the term 'Blairite' 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/New articles

message: So, how far back do we plan on keeping the list of new articles?  Its getting to be nearly 2 months long. Resolute 03:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This list is not only out of date but unnecessary, we may as well use this article for some other good use. XR228 (talk) 01:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date and unnecessary
Talk:Eynesbury, Cambridgeshire

message: ", after Ernulf, the Bishop of Rochester, Kent from 1115-1124"
I removed the above from the article. The reason it can't be true is that Eynesbury is already called 'Einuluesberie' at Domesday, so a twelfth-century bishop is right out of contention.
:Seems reasonable to me! 'Ernulf' is a Saxon name, not a Norman one, so the settlement would have been named before the conquest, any time between about 400 and 1066 AD. Can anyone find sources to support or reject this reasoning? (By the way, it's considered good manners to sign your contributions to talk. You can do that simply by putting four tildes '~' after a space at the end of your typing. The system replaces these with your name or IP address and the date and time. It helps later when reviewing a discussion. Thanks!) Chris Jefferies 22:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Art criticism

message: I added some references to the page yet no references are beeing shown on the page. How can it be remedied? Thank you. Protector 00:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By fixing the typo in the </ref> closing tag, as I just did. :-) ―Wmahan. 01:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I hope that the references will show on the page again. I understand that I am "encouraged to expand the content of articles rather than adding links." Yet if I quote I should give the reference of that quotation which makes it legitimate. I also realized that the page prematurely ends. Protector 18:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I am new to this site. When I realized what importance it might have I decided to contribute financially and add to it. I am discouraged because it seems that instead of recognizing knowledge and diligence this place may be for dilettantes!?!?Protector 20:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for showing the references again.Protector 22:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Intro says "Art criticism is the written discussion or evaluation of visual art."  I'm not sure it is appropriate to exclude oral (spoken) art, music, etc. RJFJR 15:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  visual? 

message: There is no doubt that bloggers have impacted art criticism. Notable art critic Jerry Saltz has made that clear. However, I'm not sure if some of the blogs mentioned are good examples. Paddy Johnson, Brian Sherwin, James Kalm, and a few others are very well known and have the press references and awards to show their importance. They are all known for art criticism. On the other hand Beauty Flow Magazine appears to be more about fasion than visual art and ArtId's Hispanic Art Scene has not been mentioned by any reliable sources. If an art blog has impacted art criticism it should be expected that the blogger or art blog has been mentioned on at least a few notable sources. I'm going to remove some of the blogs mentioned and add ones that focus on art criticism and have been mentioned on reliable sources.SunRiddled (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art blog section 

message: About any painting 103.7.77.89 (talk) 16:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1)Description.  2) analysis.  3) interpretation 4) suggestions
Talk:CUCC

message: I thought it was a bit silly of the cycling club to claim to be the only CUCC, so I fixed it. --Halidecyphon 22:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Question to those who have called for the deletion of this disambiguation page: what do you propose to do with the two pages it currently disambiguates??? If you want to delete this page, you'll have to delete one or both of them first... -Halidecyphon 16:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:WVKC

message: I made some revisions and partial reversions today (9/6/06) based on my personal recollections as general manager of the station and some research about station history that I conducted in the Knox College Archives in 1986-7. I would enjoy any discussion and clarification about these changes, particularly if my memory is faulty.
Stejjie 22:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Station History'''

message: I remember Al Perkins well from my days at Knox. Al resigned as chief engineer in early 1984, as I recall.  I have seen the pictures of the transmitter being installed.  The college decided to eliminate what I am told was an elevator shaft at the east end of George Davis Hall.
The frequency change was planned since 1980 but was not finished until 1990.  Stephan Bitter and James Rodd, the co-managers at the time, can confirm this, as Steve kept in touch with me regarding the change.  I am told that WVIK payed for all of the modifications and fees associated with the frequency change.
You are correct that the stereo exciter was purchased before 1984, but it was not installed until the 1984-85 school year.  My recollection is that it had to be modified for use by the station.  As an aside, it had a very nice, clean sound.  
One last by the way -- the Yard board was still being used (albeit infrequently) at least as late as 1987.  Al, who did a great job wiring the new studios, moved the Yard into a small news studio, and I remember doing some production work with it. Stejjie 18:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: =================================
Talk:E. K. Blessing

message: I am suggesting we merge this page with E. K. Blessing Band Instrument Company.  This page seems like a shorter duplicate of the other page (or vice versa), and it's likely someone created one page without realizing the other already existed.  Be sure to see the conversation on the other page.  Hopefully someone will see this tag and consider merging, I know this article isn't watched that much.71.113.44.237 (talk) 05:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I proposed this several months ago, and it seems these articles are rarely edited. Since no one has objected and since the two articles are about the exact same company with duplicates coming about by accident, per advice on H:M and WP:BOLD I will assume no controversy and attempt a merger. 71.231.76.242 (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

text: All right, done. Current article might need some clean-up, I tried a little but there might still be a bit too many redlinks and too wordy. 71.231.76.242 (talk) 07:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division (United States)

message: This should be re-directed to U.S._1st_Cavalry_Division, as is 4th Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division (I'd do it, but I don't know how to do a re-direct).  The entire article is simply a cut & paste of the official unit history, and really isn't that notable. Mike f 22:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. Under the modular unit structure since 2004, BCTs are the basic building block of the US Army. I'm working on creating articles for all the BCTs- eventually, I'll get the 4th BCT, 1st CAV created, too.82redleg (talk) 16:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

text: I served in 1ABCT, 1ID from 2011-2014. I know some of the unit history and lineage. I may be able to help with this article. I am currently working on updating some other unit history pages and will return to this one in the future. I look forward to collaborating with anyone interested in the history of the Ironhorse Bridage at Fort Hood, TX.Usfmicah (talk) 02:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elliott Smith discography

message: Hi. If anyone is interested, there is a nice article covering the "Basement II" demos on MTV's website (), proof of their notability if nothing else. - Phorque 22:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

message: from a basement on a hill and new moon are listed as Posthumous albums yet at the elliott smith box at the bottom of every page connected to him only new moon is listed as so i think that one or the outher needs to be changed and in my opinion. It should be the box  as "basement" was after his death, i was just wondering if anyone else thinks so?   i know that it says posthumous collections but i still think that from a basement on a hill should probably be included to it.
: It comes down to album vs. collection. Basement was not so much a collection as Smith intended to release at least a portion of it. I had moved Basement down to "Posthumous albums" in the box, but got reverted and now it says collection. –Pomte 02:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: from a basement on a hill placement in album section
Talk:Marleen Gorris

message: — Assignment last updated by Vicccshi (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women Filmmakers

message: — Assignment last updated by GreenBruchert8 (talk) 04:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Analyzing Cinema, Gender and Sexuality
Talk:Heathwood Hall Episcopal School

message: * Hey - somebody anonymously put a note on this page saying that it reads like an ad. He didn't, however, provide any reasoning for this on this talk page, and so I'm going to take the tag off. IF ANYONE still thinks it sounds like an ad, make a note here and put a tag back on and I'll correct it. Data8504 05:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Whoever said that Heathwood had drugs and alcohol hidden on campus was seriously misguided. Heathwood is an outstanding school, the best in the country by FAR. So please keep your lies to yourself!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.209.137.178 (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heathwood 

message: * Thanks to the unregistered users for expanding this article. Consider making an account to formally join the community! I'm a graduate of HHES, so I'm all pro-the-school, but I agree with Ezratrumpet that we need more citations and references. The previous two edits, though great, did not solve the problem, so I've put the cleanup tag back in.Data8504 08:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marked for cleanup 

message: I concur - B class seems right. Ezratrumpet 03:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class 

message: This article is not yet a B class. It needs tidying up, more content and have a few references to qualify for a B. Have a look at some of the other B class school articles to get an idea of what is required. Dahliarose 17:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I added the infobox using info gathered from the HHES website, particularly the "Fast Facts" PDF. 74.183.14.149 (talk) 03:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I started the list w/ 2 names. I can't think of any others... Thadmoore (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Alumni
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/MONGO/Proposed decision

message: Rootology admitted that the PrivateEditor account is also his, so I never asked for a checkuser verification.--MONGO 22:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Because SimonP became inactive after voting on this case, I believe the number of active arbitrators participating should be 8, with a majority of 5. (Doesn't affect the outcome, though). Thatcher131 15:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majority
Talk:The Day the Laughter Died

message: Dozens of pages on the internet say that this album "hit the Top 40 Album Chart and is cosidered the first ever comedy concept album" (sic). If this is a true and accurate transcription of this, the album at least hit number 56 in the US Billboard charts. How high did it go, and for how long? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart

message: I've heard this album. It is NOT funny, the audience is NOT responding well to Clay's jokes, Clay himself sounds high or drunk or both and is not at his best at all. I'd like to see a citation on the claim that this album was received as well as this page claims, because when I listened to this it sounded absolutely painful, like the last gasps of a comedian whose career is declining, and everyone around him knows it except for him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.91.27.50 (talk) 21:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Masterpiece?"