Talk:Chile national football team

message: The image :Image:Chile football association.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      File:Chile football association.png
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Chile football association.gif

message: This section should list the squad (typically 18-25 men) called up for a match, not the starting 11.  I cannot believe that only 11 people, with no goalkeeper, were called up to train togther and make themselves available for the recent match against Ukraine.  This needs to be corrected. Kevin McE (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The user added the partial list that has been made available that only includes the foreign based players that were called up by Bielsa. The rest of the squad that is made up of local league players will be added to the list after the round of games this weekend. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 10:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For a match on 7 August?  That was two weeks ago.  Kevin McE (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The partial list of foreign based players was released around August 19 & it's for the upcoming friendly with Ukraine on September 7th. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 10:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current squad 

message: ===Current squad===
The following 20 international players were called up to participate in the Friendly Match against Uruguay on November 17, 2010.
Caps and goals updated as November 17, 2010.
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
===Recent call-ups===
The following players have been called up in 2010.
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
190.160.251.217 (talk) 05:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  Well, first of all this you even read what the Recent call-ups section says? In case you didn't see it here it is: "The following players have been called up in 2010" that means all of the players that were called up during 2010 appear in the section, not just that ones that you want, also removing the players that played in 2010 is against the consensus reached at WT:FOOTY, lastly this same edit is the reason as to why the article is currently protected. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see nothing in that thread that amounts to a strong consensus, but there is a tacit consensus across such articles that the Recent Call-ups list is based on going back either 6 or 12 months. Having it based on a calendar year does not seem a good idea: will it be blanked on 1st Jan, or will it continue growing indefinitely? Kevin McE (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that's what I tried to say when I meant consensus, plus most of the main national team articles have it. As far as the other part, I will be changing the "2010" part to "the last 12 months" just like it appears in other articles, if not as you stated the section would have to be blanked in a couple of weeks from now. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Done Kevin McE (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Players

message: The following players have been called up in 2010.
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
|-----
! colspan="9" bgcolor="#B0D3FB" align="left" |
|----- bgcolor="#DFEDFD"
190.160.251.217 (talk) 05:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  Well, first of all this you even read what the Recent call-ups section says? In case you didn't see it here it is: "The following players have been called up in 2010" that means all of the players that were called up during 2010 appear in the section, not just that ones that you want, also removing the players that played in 2010 is against the consensus reached at WT:FOOTY, lastly this same edit is the reason as to why the article is currently protected. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see nothing in that thread that amounts to a strong consensus, but there is a tacit consensus across such articles that the Recent Call-ups list is based on going back either 6 or 12 months. Having it based on a calendar year does not seem a good idea: will it be blanked on 1st Jan, or will it continue growing indefinitely? Kevin McE (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that's what I tried to say when I meant consensus, plus most of the main national team articles have it. As far as the other part, I will be changing the "2010" part to "the last 12 months" just like it appears in other articles, if not as you stated the section would have to be blanked in a couple of weeks from now. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent call-ups

message: I see no reason why squad lists are being updated on this talk page.  It is not what talk pages are for, and not what this discusion was about.  I propose reverting the opening of this thread to the proposal originally made in December, and "hatting" the table to reduce its visibility to discourage such abuse of a talk page, and will do so in 24 hours unless strong reason to the contrary is presented here.  Kevin McE (talk) 21:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Kevin McE (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Misuse of talk page

message: The collapsible box of results under the current manager is not replicated in any other NFT article.  Please provide valid reason for it here. Equally, on what basis is the reader meant to guess the colour coding on the recently re-formatted list of results? Kevin McE (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The color key has been added to the latest result section, also the "Results under manager" have being hidden so that a proper consensus could be reached about it. I personally believed that it doesn't make sense to add them, since it is almost like saying that the results of all the managers before didn't matter. I also think that those results are better fitted for the managers article than for the national team article--Bocafan76 (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No argument presented for restoring results under current manager, so removed. Kevin McE (talk) 08:19, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results under manager 

message: Just wanted to say that on the picture of the kits the collar is white not red, i can tell you that because i am wearing that shirt right now.
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.184.43 (talk) 22:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  uniform 

message: Never heard of  a Bolivian rivalry at all, (Im Chilean) on the other side, Peru is an important match, but not our classic......I suggest delete those entries....
.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.105.107.228 (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peru and Bolivia Rivalry??? 

message: The important matches of Chile are 2: Argentina and Peru, Uruguay is not an important match at all for us chileans....but none of them are our classic, in fact, Chile don´t have a "classic" in South America, please stop editing this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.105.107.228 (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chile Rivalries 

message: First of all, I'm Chilean, so don't ignore me or delete this, CHILE DON´T have a "rival" or "classic" in southamerica, peru isn´t, argentina neither, but are 2 important matches for us, but i repeat, none of them are our classic....stop puting peru on it...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.27.57.58 (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chilean Classic 

message: Chile is ranked #4 http://internationalsports.nfshost.com/index.php/home/load_sports/5/2017 --Abejones (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: add wealth and population adjusted Elo rating below FIFA and Elo rating 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chile national football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070910164430/http://revista.guachacas.cl/Epi_mundial30.html to http://revista.guachacas.cl/Epi_mundial30.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Hey 
You reverted a change without explanation therefore I thought I'd bring up the topic here to get your thoughts as to why.
1) Players in bold are still active, at least at club level.
2) Players in bold are still active with Chile.
The reason that I amended version 1 to 2 is that players such as Humberto Suazo have been inactive from the Chilean national team for eight years therefore shouldn't be considered relevant to the team anymore. This is also true for Gonzalo Jara as he retired internationally therefore will not gain another cap for Chile. Why do you feel that having players active at club level is relevant to the national team?
Thanks,
Felixsv7 (talk) 09:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Records section 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghanistan national football team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 15:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghanistan national football team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 14:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress