Talk:Port Phillip Channel Deepening Project

message: Any ideas on how we should organise the information in this article? Here's a start: some background on the issue (the project planning dates back to 2004); a clear timeline of events associated with the dredging; a separate controversies section....
Davido321 (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What would be really good to have is a map showing how Phillip is being dredged...Davido321 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 23:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. A map would be a great idea. How about some community involvement too, some truthfulness and accountability also perhaps? Or consideration for lifeforms other than human? Nick carson (talk) 03:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: From the lead With a budget of $AU969 million, $AU150 million of this cost taxpayer funded[1], the dredging project is currently being carried by Dutch company Royal Boskalis Westminster for the Port of Melbourne Corporation (PoMC), a statutory body established by the Victorian Government responsible for the running of the port, at a cost of $AU500 million and is expected to be completed before December 31, 2009....   The highleghted part is it necessary to explain who/what PoMC is in the lead, the current sentence is hard to read initial thought is what does the cost of PoMC and that its to be completed by 2009 have to do with the dredging. Gnangarra 01:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarify 

message: The image :Image:Port of melbourne logo.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a resident of Melbourne, I think port of melbourne waived their right to copyright when they ignored our right to uncontaminated coastal waters. Nick carson (talk) 03:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Port of melbourne logo.gif

message: A Map of the main Shipping Channel (and also the Geelong Channel) would be very useful in the context of this article and also for the Port Phillip article.  It could highlight the areas being deepened.  --Biatch (talk) 07:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. If I had time I would compile the various versions and make one myself. Nick carson (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of the main Shipping Channel 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Port Phillip Channel Deepening Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070831195511/http://www.channelproject.com.au/global/docs/MR_050805_InjunctionDecision.pdf to http://www.channelproject.com.au/global/docs/MR_050805_InjunctionDecision.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified