Talk:Abu Bakker Qassim

message: Recent revisions changed where Qassim was being held from Camp Iguana to Camp Tango.
A Google search for "Camp Tango" Abu Bakker Qassim produces just one hit, to a blog site.  That blog site, in my mozilla firefox, is rendered with black text on a black background.  I had to cut and past the text to read it.  I see no mention of a "Camp Tango".  Presumably some large camps, with lots of sub-camps, will all share the use of Camps, Able, Baker, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot, through Tango.
Can anyone come up with a verifiable source for the existence, purpose, history of a Camp Tango at Guantanamo?  --  Geo Swan 01:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was purely an error on my part.  I corrected the reference to Tango, it is now Iguana. --Assawyer 02:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Camp Tango?

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 04:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]].

message: The Combatant Status Review section had a subsection "Transcript" i have removed most of the information there for the following reasons: 1) I do not see the information is rightly placed under CSRT subsection "Transcript". 2) The introduction (hidden in the template) does not make clear the real source for the text. 3) It is based on a questionable redacted primary source. 4) The introduction text presents this information as "brief biography" what i do not see as given. 5) The text includes allegation that needs multiply sources for verification. 6) The introduction text states that the source asserted: (all Uighur) "they where all caught at an "ETIM training camp". I do not see that a given in this reference. It may be the interpretation of the WP editor. I have strong concerns to present this in the way it has been done here. Please discuss before re-adding the controversial material that violates BLP policies in his current form. IQinn (talk) 23:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Believing a section needs changes invokes WP:SOFIXIT, not deletion. Fix the problems you see; and be careful, you are continuing to either misunderstand or misrepresent WP policies. Multiple sources are not needed to verify a primary source (or similar)'s claim if we are reporting what the primary(~) source says. For example, to say "The Guardian newspaper reported..." we do not need a NYT reference, we just need the Guardian reference. The same applies here. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  21:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are the one who misunderstand or misrepresent policies and you are edit warring again. Please do not do this! You have been blocked for edit warring in the past and you will be blocked again. Please do change the information and address the points that i have listed here. You are welcome to fix the problems but that should be happen before reverting the material back into the article in case of BLP concerns. The information that i have removed is represented in a misleading way. You have added this material together with user Geo Swan. Stupidest re-inserting into the article without fixing it is vandalism and damages the reputation of Wikipedia. There is not "consensus" we all know that you have build up the Guantanamo section together with user Geo Swan with a strong POV that borders propaganda and that you routinely comes out to revert for him whenever he can mot make his points in discussions and he did not address the points that i have listed here as well as you have not addressed the points that i have listed here. Please do. IQinn (talk) 22:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: removal of questionable information (2)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Abu Bakker Qassim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050401094851/http://breakingnews.nypost.com:80/dynamic/stories/G/GUANTANAMO_DETAINEES?SITE=NYNYP&SECTION=SPORTS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT to http://breakingnews.nypost.com/dynamic/stories/G/GUANTANAMO_DETAINEES?SITE=NYNYP&SECTION=SPORTS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
*Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.mcclatchyinteractive.com%2Fdetainees%3Fpage%3D2&date=2008-06-18 with https://web.archive.org/web/20080620093342/http://services.mcclatchyinteractive.com/detainees?page=2 on http://services.mcclatchyinteractive.com/detainees?page=2
*Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdetainees.mcclatchydc.com%2Fdetainees%2F24&date=2008-08-01 with https://web.archive.org/web/20080626183755/http://detainees.mcclatchydc.com/detainees/24 on http://detainees.mcclatchydc.com/detainees/24
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Abu Bakker Qassim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071203004301/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/index_CSRT_detainees_testimony.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/index_CSRT_detainees_testimony.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507052607/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000300-000399.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000300-000399.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092703076_pf.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified