lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Helix Bridge

message: The bridge name is now open for feedback. See  or  - oahiyeel talk 16:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge name 

message: I removed the photo of the Helix Bridge, since it was a picture that was a "fair use" minimized photo, and instead placed a photo taken on 24 April, 2010, the date of the opening of the bridge at night. I also have some fantastic images I can upload to Wikimedia Commons as I did with this image, of the Marina and all the other attractions that are newly built, if anyone should wish to use them in any of the articles in Singapore. Just leave a note on my talk page. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Helix brige 84.54.76.97 (talk) 10:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helix bridge 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20141031074429/http://www.euro-inox.org/htm/p_209_EN.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 09:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Elgin Bridge (Singapore)

message: Under "History" we are informed that the iron bridge of 1862 in 1925 had to make way for a new concrete bridge. And then we read that Elgin Bridge is known as thih tiau kio in Hokkien, meaning "iron suspension bridge". Could someone please resolve/clarify this contradiction?  --Vsop.de (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  concrete or iron suspension bridge?
Talk:Esplanade Bridge

message: on the merlion side there is a lovely view of the water and bridge in addition to a starbucks and some other developments.  On the Esplanade side there is a rather ugly wall blocking the view and a number of good places for vagrants to sleep.  Does anyone know if that side is going to be seeing any upgrades? DaronDierkes (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  future developments
Talk:Reconciliation (United States Congress)

message: ::"...Senators could theoretically prevent passage of a reconciliation bill by offering an unending series of amendments in a process known as a "Vote-a-Rama,"[b] but, unlike the modern filibuster, senators introducing these amendments must stand up and verbally offer the amendments..."
I find this explanation confusing.   How is having to stand up and verbally offer the amendments a different (or implied, more difficult) process than a filibuster?  
Supernova87a (talk) 06:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote-a-rama?
Talk:Schizomida

message: Hello, I accidently found that there is a pseudoscorpion image in commons , which was made by Hans Henderickx. He said that his photo could be used in wikipedia if it's name is mentioned. Mayby it is possible to put at least on of the schizomida images from  which were made by him too or the use of them should be confirmed once more? --Vezhlys 22:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Handel Commemoration

message: All of the reputable material I have found states that the Commemoration took place in 1784, but I have found a couple of sites that mention 1791. --RichardVeryard 22:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Ignition device

message: Isn't this largely redundant with making fire? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 22:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  My mistake in creating it. --Smack (talk) 04:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is tehre enough independent content to keep this separate?
Talk:Martin Lawrence Live: Runteldat

message: What in the world is a "Runteldat?" How is that pronounced? What does it mean? This should be researched and explained. --71.205.219.29 (talk) 08:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibberish Word In The Title 
Talk:List of United States Senate election disputes

message: The 2008 Coleman-Franken election was settled as a matter of Minnesota law; most such disputes are settled at the state level before even coming before the Senate.  In every other cases in this list, the Senate itself became involved to settle the dispute.  Should this case even be on this page? Uberhill 18:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Franken Not Resolved by the Senate
Talk:Search engine prominence

message: from the writer of the article: I work as a professional search engine marketeer and in order to explain the difference between optimisation i.e. stuff they can control and prominence whicih is stuff they can't directly control  i came up with the term; search engine prominence. 
normally I wouldnt feel that strongly about this issue except that for me and my clients it all makes complete sense. After all how much sense does link bait make ? All i'm doing is defining something which is not well defined at the moment. other related terms are linkbait, in linking, backlinking etc, but none of these deal with the core concept of search engines seeing one site as more important/prominent than another and ranking keywords accordingly..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepguy (talk • contribs) 
:Please read WP:OR. Wikipedia is not for things you made up yourself. --- RockMFR 03:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: reason for re inclusion

message: "Search engine prominence" is not (yet) really standard terminology, so I wonder if an article is justified. A Google search on the phrase returns only 542 hits, compared with over 36 million for "search engine optimization" and over 23 million for "search engine marketing". Are there source references, or would this fall under (Wikipedia's policy against original research)? --IslandGyrl 22:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not standard terminology
Talk:Benson & Hedges Challenge

message: This page should be renamed "Benson and Hedges Challenge". The tournament was never known as the "Benson and Hedges Perth Challenge" and it does not share a name with any other sporting event that requires it to be differentiated.
Inxia 22:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: —Moondyne 06:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Misumenops asperatus

message: In arachnology, there is a current trend (especially in the west coast/midwest) to refer to genus Misumenops as Mecaphesa. Because many people who are likely searching the wiki for this animal, I have added Mecaphesa asperatus to the Synonym table. If you search bugguide.net, you will only find this animal ranked as Mecaphesa asperatus instead of Misumenops asperatus 134.50.156.119 (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mecaphesa?

message: I updated the page and added citations from Howell's 2004 overview, so can we remove the NO CITATION tage on the page? I also linked to some of the more important anatomy pages (e.g., trichobothria, as they are diagnosic of the species). I also added a picture of a sub-adult female. Will update with superior image when possible!  AlaskaDave (talk) 02:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First Citation/Remove NO CITATION error tag?
Talk:Lafayette-Lehigh rivalry

message: I think we should really consolidate both the Lehigh-Lafayette and Lafayette-Lehigh rivalry pages into one sing page titled "The Rivalry" and redirect to that page.  This way, both pages are not the exact same thing (save the first sentence) and both do not have to be updated.  What does everyone think about this issue? Plm209 22:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is the best option Bgold4 01:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the original Lehigh-Lafayette page and the  Lafayette-Lehigh one just redirects there so it is the same page.  I'd love to rename it "The Rivalry" if that hasn't been already taken. GCW50 14:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:Charles Heywood

message: About a year ago, an anon added the MOH to the article. I think that the editor in question saw the large medal in :File:Charles Heywood.jpg and assumed it was an old version of the MOH, which is reasonable, because it looks a great deal like some of the old army versions. Unfortunately, that anon was either mistaken or performing some vandalism. There has never been an iteration of the Medal of Honor that looks exactly like the medal shown in the portrait. In addition, Heywood's name does not appear on any list of MOH recipients, official or unofficial, and there is no indication whatsoever of when, where, and how he would have earned it. Neither the official biography nor any of the other references for Heywoon note that he is the recipient of the US's highest award (and that would certainly be a huge oversight if he ideed actually was awarded). I have removed any refernce to the MOH from the article. If anyone would like to disagree, then let me know. bahamut0013wordsdeeds  06:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding and correcting the error — which was obviously introduced without any evidence to support the claim.  Possible, as you noted, that it was a good faith edit.  Unfortunate that it remained in the article for so long. — ERcheck (talk) 14:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, good catch. The medal he is wearing is a GAR membership medal. — jwillbur 17:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: jwillbur — thanks for showing us the GAR membership medal.  Any idea on the other two that he is wearing?  — ERcheck (talk) 00:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The second one looks like a Loyal Legion medal. I would guess that the third is from another veterans' organization, but I can't place it. — jwillbur 02:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting... Seems that a lot of the military men of the 19th century tended to wear unauthorized devices quite frequently. For example, Littleton Waller drove me nuts with that little triangular medal till I actuall decided to sit and read the whole article. spǝǝpspɹoʍ3100ʇnɯɐɥɐq 17:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal of Honor
Talk:František Drtikol

message: 89.24.225.54 edited the page to indicate that the artist was really an esports player. I reverted this. Hope I did everything OK. 24.38.3.29 (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert vandalism 
Talk:Wildflowers of the Great Smoky Mountains

message: Using Wildflowers of the Canadian Rocy Mountains as a model.
only working on it for twenty minutes
New and Upcoming Edits:
Edited the table fixing minor capitalization problems and link problems. Added a few new flowers with both Latin and common names. Did not have enough time to find any non-copywrite pictures for those flowers. Plan to edit the threats section later and add new info and citations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weeklytree (talk • contribs) 17:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The table looks great! I know it's a little monotonous but it's really important for folks trying to link externally to more info! Rhizomesandranch (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Omnitrans

message: Placed a source tag under Ridership. Since when does public (bus) transportation ridership indicate the status of the general economy? --theSpectator talk 23:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ridership?

message: a few days ago, the press enterprise reported how omnitrans was trying to become a transit district, would that go in as controversy or future decisionsJaviern (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The only article that I could find on the PE site was this one, and I couldn't find any mention of a "transit district". What exactly do you mean by transit district? --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 04:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: if omnitrans becomes a transit district like la Metro, they have the ability to put on the ballot propositions where they can add a transit tax such as the tax to expand the la subway. in omnitrans case,it would be to provide more routes. it was not that article. it was a few days prior to that one. if can find it again, i will put a link here 75.16.40.24 (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  transit district 
Talk:Mark Divo

message: He has three times been awarded the city of Zurich's art prize Is this perhaps referring to another prize than the 50.000 SWF Kunstpreis der Stadt Zürich?  http://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/content/kultur/de/index/kultur_stadt_zuerich/auszeichnungen/kunstpreis0.html does not list Divo as a recipient. Michiel Duvekot 21:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zurich's art prize 
Talk:Hugh Welch Diamond

message: The original article on Hugh Welch Diamond in the Frenche WP (fr:Hugh Welch Diamond)was a translation of this article.The french article has been expanded and gives more details of the biography and medical career. It is perhaps useful to see if the english version should be like-wise expanded. William Ellison (talk) 09:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  H.W. Diamond in the french Wikipedia
Talk:Terry Deglau

message: This article is completely unsourced, and it has been around since 2005. I went to look for citations, but now I'm really confused. The article states that he did photography for the UN in 2000, however, I found this obituary online that says he died in 1999. Perhaps the bios of more than one Terry Deglau may have been conflated? Either way, I'm reluctant to add his birth and death dates, and I can't seem to verify the UN project. Netherzone (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources added. I checked the obit ye provided and it lists the date as 2019, which was confirmed by a Pittsburgh Tribune article (sourced in the article) CiphriusKane (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: But that does not explain how he could take a group photo in 2000 if he died in 1999. Netherzone (talk) 04:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Terry J. Deglau, 79, died Sept. 14, 2019 at Redstone Senior Care Center in Greensburg." That is from the obituary ye posted CiphriusKane (talk) 21:06, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Huge goof on my part, I'm not sure how I kept reading it as 1999! I'll revert my edit in the article unless you have already done so. Netherzone (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion about this photographer + lack of sourcing
Talk:Countrycide

message: Ianto says that his last kiss was with Lisa, but infact he doesn't realize it was with Jack. And also Jack thinks his last kiss was with the sex gas. But I seriously think that Jack was in a passionate kiss.
:Gwen uses the term 'snog', specifically, so I don't think the "Cyberwoman" Jack/Ianto 'kiss' counts all that particularly, at least on Ianto's part. Radagast 03:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone else think Jack may have meant the Doctor?  He might be counting that as his last "real" one. ~ CZeke 21:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Since he last saw the Doctor, Jack has travelled back in time and lived through the whole of the twentieth century — I would imagine he's kissed a few people in that time! Estelle from "Small Worlds" for one. Jellyman (talk) 00:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ianto's last kiss 

message: How do we know this episode was in the Brecon Beacons? I don't remember anyone naming a location for the village. U-Mos 16:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The location was stated in the BBC press releases for the episode — and you can sort of tell by the landscape, I think. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 16:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brecon Beacons? 

message: Would anyone familiar with the rock quarries in the old Doctor Who series recognize the one (at the first investigation site) as one of them?  It looks kind of familiar, but there were so many in the old series. blx 08:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Doctor Who Quarry? 

message: I added some references, but I couldn't figure out how to add them to the one existing reference so that they all form one cohesive list. Hopefully someone else can fix that? And hopefully then the article won't be in danger of being deleted/merged?
Because, the reason this article/episode is important is because it stands out from all other Torchwood episodes. It is the only one that doesn't have aliens as monsters - it has humans as monsters. And it is the scariest freakin' episode in the entire run of Torchwood. So it's making an important meta-point that we ourselves are the scariest monsters of all. I regularly refer to it in conversation for this reason. I think it is definitely notable enough to warrant its own page. 68.0.206.102 (talk) 02:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added some references and Why This Episode Matters
Talk:Tampa 2

message: I think an updated list of teams using this strategy would be very useful, as the user can then find video showcasing the defense, which is probably the easiest way to understand tampa 2 is to see it in action.  Also, can we discuss how tampa 2 kills offensive production of #1 receivers more in-depth?  Killing my fantasy production...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsjameson (talk • contribs) 17:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: This article is Plagiarized. The Technical Details section is copy-and-pasted from http://www.footballtimes.org/Article.asp?ID=167  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.71.88 (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: The introduction didn't really explain what the Tampa 2 defense is, so I added a sentence.  It could probably use additional improvement by someone more knowledgeable than me.  Billgordon1099 (talk) 19:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction could be improved
Talk:Myocardium

message: You forgot to mention the epicardium. the thin surface on the surface of the heart. the pericardium is not actualyy part of the heart but a bag that holds the heart.
*Performance of the myocardium is mediated by the [autonomic nervous system]. The sinoatrial node propagates electrical/sympathetic [systole]. The spinal ganglia and vagus nerve propagate electrical/parasympathetic [diastole]. --Lbeben (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

message: These two articles refer to the same thing. I think they should be put together. Kadellar (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Cardiac muscle for ongoing discussion ----Seans Potato Business 12:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myocardium and Cardiac muscle
Talk:Alexandra Zaretsky

message: In the article about her brother, the birth place is listed as Minsk, Soviet Union. In this article it is Minsk, Belarus. Shouldn't this be consistent? Is there a policy for these kind of questions? She is born 1987, so it is not a question about Belarus becoming independent between the birth of the siblings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.142.14 (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth place? 
Talk:Kevin Malone

message: This page should not be deleted. The roles of The Office supporting characters keep expanding. on the "List of The Office characters" page, the bios were taking up too much room and we need to start making seperate pages. More detailed info will be added later. This goes for all supporting characters. I see no reason at all why this should be deleted.Puppet125 23:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't delete

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: shouldn't it be mentioned that he takes rogaine? (drug testing)
:Huh? Dwight accuses Kevin of taking Rogaine, and Kevin denies it. I see no reason to mention a one-off joke. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- Raymondc0 22:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just speculation. -- Raymondc0 22:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rogaine 

message: I doubt it.  Both are overweight, socially-inept but musical accountants, but Keith is comatose compared with Kevin.  Kransky 12:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  based on Keith? 

message: Not sure why this contribution was reverted.  Maybe it sounds like vandalism, but in "Did I Stutter?" Kevin openly admits to Pam that he finds librarians sexually arousing.  I'm going to restore that information, at least until someone offers an adequate explanation of why it's incorrect. 75.3.141.227 (talk) 07:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fetish for librarians 

message: I don't know much about this deletion process so I don't really know what I'm supposed to do but I see no reason why this should be deleted. It is an article about a character from The Office, it is a lengthy page, and it does not look sloppy. Puppet125 (talk) 17:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But it lacks assertion of notability via secondary, reliable sources, as per WP:N. Therefor, the content should not be here (it should be in the list of characters, as the best). Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Do Not Delete

message: Since someone objects to outright deletion, I propose merging the content into the List of Characters. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This should definitely be merged. The is almost completely an in-universe plot summary. --TorsodogTalk 20:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge