Talk:Polo (confectionery)

message: In the "Media & Entertainment" section, "The Mighty Boosh" got listed twice. Never having seen it (or a Polo!) before, I thought I'd let someone else fix it. anon 07:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the Boosh reference has been scrapped altogether. I'm hip to the desire to limit trivia, but Noel Fielding's graphics work for the show is packed with Polo mints. PurpleChez (talk) 14:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mighty Boosh. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Polo (mints). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071104161646/http://www.nestle.co.uk:80/OurBrands/AboutOurBrands/ConfectioneryAndCakes/History+of+Rowntree.htm to http://www.nestle.co.uk/OurBrands/AboutOurBrands/ConfectioneryAndCakes/History+of+Rowntree.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Polo (confectionery). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130514135345/http://thebhc.org/publications/BEHprint/v018/p0045-p0058.pdf to http://www.thebhc.org/publications/BEHprint/v018/p0045-p0058.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nestle.co.uk/OurBrands/AboutOurBrands/ConfectioneryAndCakes/History+of+Rowntree.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615043306/http://www.rowntrees.co.uk/nestle/ to http://www.rowntrees.co.uk/nestle/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the article it is stated that the name ‘polo’n as on ‘polo mints’ is reflective of the cool taste of the mints and is derived from the word ‘polar’. This is incorrect. Fruit flavoured polos do not have the sane ‘cool’ taste, therefore the ‘polar’ analogy would not apply, however, they are still referred to as ‘polos’. The name actually derives from the similarity in appearance between the polo mint and the rubber grommets around the holes in a polo helmet. The sport of polo has been influential in the naming of numerous things including the polo shirt, the polo necked sweater and the chukka boot. 2A01:4C8:461:FF1D:2DC1:FFBA:B619:C71F (talk) 09:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The mint flavour came first, obviously. You will need to cite a source that refers to the polo helmet origin for the name. --Hazhk (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polo mints, what are they named after? 

message: Was rationing just after the war any influence on there being a hole?
Middle More Rider (talk) 14:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW2 and the hole? 

message: The "History" section claims that Polo mints' introduction was delayed by World War 2, but it also says that they weren't developed until after Rowntree had manufactured Life Savers under license during the war.
The reference Rowntree and Market Strategy says that they were developed in 1939 and supports the claim that the war delayed their introduction. But the reference Why We Love Things in Mint Condition quotes "confectionery expert Dr William Edwards," whom it describes as having worked for a decade at Rowntree, as saying that rather than being a pre-war development, Polos were developed in response to the post-war cancellation of the licensing agreement.
Whichever of these versions of history is accurate, our article ought to pick one or the other and stick with it. As it is, the article simultaneously asserts both. PaulTanenbaum (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The description of the history contradicts itself