lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:River Forth

message: Created first version (source was mostly the relevant Ordnance Survey map).  I guess someone's going to get upset, saying "meanders through Stirling" isn't encyclopedic language, but it's true in the technical sense - there really are several tight loops in the river (meanders) so I'm really not being flowery, honest. -- Finlay McWalter 21:01, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Where does the unusual name "Forth" come from? -- Beland 04:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article says that it is from the Gaelic.Pyrotec
I thought there was an alternative theory, and the "Forth" comes from fjordur -- i.e. "the Forth" means "the Fjord", referring to the fact that it's navigable all the way up to Stirling (you can't get past the bridges as there's a slight cataract under them that would have been just about fordable at low tide.
Prof Wrong (talk) 19:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origin 

message: how many m3/s does it have on average?
seems quite a lot.  typically 1-2m/s and it is wide. isn't it? Wikistallion (talk) 20:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  And it's MQ? 

message: I’d love to edit this section, but I’ve never done it, and worry about formatting. There are more than 7 bridges between Stirling and Queensferry. Close by, and just downstream from the Old Bridge is the Stirling New Bridge (also known as the William IV Bridge), designed by Robert Stevenson, and which replaced the Old Bridge for wheeled traffic in 1833.  This was the lowest road crossing until the Kincardine bridge in 1936. Adjacent to the east (downstream) stands the mid-19th C Stirling Forth Viaduct, built for the Stirling and Dunfermiline Railway some time prior to 1863 (when it is visible in an Ordnance Survey map). Finally, an unnamed bridge of 1985, known locally as the Taylorton Bridge, carries the A91 over the river to the northeast of Springkerse, as part of a bypass of the City of Stirling. Which totals, I believe, ten bridges. Giesabrek (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridges
Talk:Cybercrime

message: — Assignment last updated by Dmaccartney (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Crime and Media

message: — Assignment last updated by Ayjayym (talk) 12:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cybersecurity Policy

message: Pleasehe help me 2409:4073:2106:2CA:0:0:19E4:48B1 (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a place to get help with your Facebook account getting hacked. I would suggest changing your password, though. - Master of Hedgehogs (converse) (hate that hedgehog!) 15:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facebook hacked
Talk:Vertebrate

message: The "Phylogenetic relationships" section of this article, while looking very well made, has some outdated taxonomy in it regarding Acanthodii and Placodermi groups. The biggest problem are the Acanthodians, which here are shown as being a spread across chondrichthyes and osteichthyes while more recent taxonomy has them all as stem-chondrichthyans. The Placoderms look alright, but they should mention "maxillate" placoderms like Entelognathus. I believe they should take the place of Diplacanthus on the diagram.
I would do it myself, but I'm unfamiliar with editing clade diagrams. Jvirus2 (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Phylogenetic relationships" Outdated Taxonomy 

message: Looks like there may be a problem with the layout of the list of classes in the main article body. For example, Tetrapoda appear to be listed as a sub-class of Sarcopterygii. 104.142.119.254 (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetrapoda are listed as a sub-class of Sarcopterygii in the main article body 

message: The redirect Ossea has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ossea]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Anatomy of vertebrates has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Anatomy of vertebrates]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Forth

message: I added a (brief) page on River Forth, which I figure necessitates changing this page from an automatic redirect to Forth programming language to a proper disambiguation page.  I think I've changed all the links here, other than user and talk pages (where fixing things would be confusing, I think). -- Finlay McWalter 22:43, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Process music

message: Systems music seems to have a separate definition as a British type of minimalist music. (However, I have only heard the term once myself, and was told it just meant 'minimalism'.) It seems two or three of these articles should be combined. Ben Finn 17:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ben Finn, you have a point.  There's nothing in the Systems music article that would preclude its all falling under the rubric of "Process music", even if the composers themselves never applied that term. yoyo (talk) 13:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systems music

message: I notice that Hyacinth has added a "Refimprove" banner to the section "Notable works". Heaven knows this section could be improved, but I'm uncertain whether this call is meant to ask for a reference to be added to each entry and, if so, whether the matter at issue is the notability of the examples, or whether and by which definition they qualify as "process music".—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Refimprove?

message: *"doesn't actually explain what the process is or how it is made audible"
I removed the above since there isn't only one process and only one way of making processes audible.
However, why, what, and how does the introduction to this article provide insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject and what should be done about it? Hyacinth (talk) 20:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Even written as, "doesn't actually explain what the processes are or how they are made audible," this explanation would belong in the body of the article and not in the introduction. Hyacinth (talk) 20:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree absolutely. I've made a start. Perhaps once the body of the article has got better definitions in it, the lede can be expanded a bit, too.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 00:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: Why and where does this article lack sufficient context? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth (talk) 06:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've made some progress in this direction since this question was last raised nearly a year ago. I'm not sure whether this yet provides sufficient context, and would like to hear specific criticisms and suggestions for further improvement along these lines.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Insufficient context
Talk:78 (number)

message: removed text:
<Drat. This is what Ian Stewart claimed and diagrammed in Another Fine Math You've Got Me Into; but Dahlke's page has a different diagram w/76…that makes 78 much less interesting.>
(this is in reference to the *ino thing) Huh?  Paullusmagnus 23:39, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The 78 RPM record can be in one of two formats.  It can be an Edison Disc format, or it can be a Victrola format.  Both Discs are about the same size and both have the same size hole in the middle.  Edison Discs do not play well with a Victrola reproducer, and Victrola Discs do not play well with an Edison reproducer.  This is because the modulation within the groove is perpendicular to that of the other system.  The Victrola system uses a side to side modulation or wiggle, and the Edison system uses depth modulation.
This is somewhat wrong in several ways, beginning in that Edison Records discs rotate at 80 rpm, not 78, as do many pre-mid 1920s lateral discs; Edisons are often not considered "78s" by collectors, and if one uses "78" as a catch-all for all pre-WWII systems of discs, there are certainly more than two formats (Pathe Records being the most prominent neither-of-the-aboves). I might try to sort this out in more detail later, but if so it might better belong in the gramophone record article. -- Infrogmation 05:24, 2 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: Since the number of heptominos is a geometrical property (therefore mathematical) rather than a cultural association (the kind of thing the '78 is also' section is used for) I thunk it appropriate to move the heptominos paragraph up and out of the '78 is also' section. -- Anonymous User
----
Wouldn't there be 364 gifts total in the 12 days of Christmas?  (1 on the first day, 3 on the 2nd, 6 on the third...78 on the 12th)?
/9*→→→== Prostitutes ==
During the 1970s and 1980s some prostitutes took to describing clients who ejaculated quickly as 78s, reflecting the fact those records spin more quickly than others. The slang is now reported to have fallen into disuse.
Does this really belong he/re? It reads like some sort of bad joke cribbed out of the Urban Dictionary... 217.155.20.163 15:03, 5 jnfgvhfdjfvhfdyfy6tjuyr4jNovember 2006 (UTC)
puoyhkjhljmyhig,prutr,iyytluhto ktukkltktkbm5685874154/85r7g77jknhgtfgbe87745457649575hmkv jgvbm967457487] 15:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heptominos moved up 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bingo names -

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg for a centralized discusion as to whether Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg should be included in these pages. Certes (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg
Talk:University of Stirling

message: The lead is currently a wall of text, this needs paragraphs. Ideally the structure should be a summary of the sections of the article. Aloneinthewild (talk) 23:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 
Talk:Lane–Emden equation

message: I don't understand the word "also" in the first sentence. Michael Hardy 02:04, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)

message: I'm currently working on substantially overhauling this article. My work so far is contained in my Userspace at this page: User:Warrickball/Lane–Emden_equation. It's not perfect, and will hopefully improve as others edit it over time. I've tried to add a derivation of the equation and a new figure with the computed solutions. I still intend to add a section about the homology relations and the transformed equation, as well as the isothermal version of the equation. I hope to ultimately merge polytropes. It doesn't make sense to me to discuss the equation and its solutions in separate articles.
Warrickball (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul 

message: How can n = 0? n is defined at the top in "The index n is the polytropic index that appears in the polytropic equation of state, P = K \rho^{1 + \frac{1}{n}}\,. So if n = 0, then what equation of state would that be? P = K \rho^{\infty}\,? --24.130.146.226 (talk) 07:25, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  n = 0 case 

message: The section on the n=5 case *seems* to be presenting how to solve the equation, but the steps make no sense. There's no way to get from the first line (the equation for n=5) to the second line (an expression for the derivative of the solution) without already having solved the equation. The author appears to be demonstrating that the solution works, but not very clearly. Do we need this at all?
The actual solution method was given by Chandrasekhar in a 1967 book; see https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Lane-EmdenDifferentialEquation.html Beanyk (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  n=5 "derivation" makes no sense
Talk:5 BC

message: Loradrmarno - King of Stavutskhomur
... was placed under 'Events' by 65.218.60.6. Neither name turns up -any- results on Google. Removed until verified. -- Jake 02:15, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? The link works fine for me. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 12:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is 404 for me.  Here is the old webpage.  I think we need a better source.  Chronology of Jesus doesnt mention 29 September. --John Vandenberg (chat) 06:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Bernoulli's principle

message: Hi everyone,
I think that I noticed an error in reference [15] about the use of incompressible flow bernouilli's equation. It gives the reference to page 602 of the book but it rather seems to be at page 610 as you can see here.
This is the first time I suggest something on wikipedia so I don't know if I have to modify it by myself or signal it first.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.208.16.31 (talk) 19:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference 15 quotes p.602 in the 6th edition of White’s book. Are you quoting from the 6th, or some other, edition? I haven’t been able to download the .pdf file you supplied. Dolphin (t) 03:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems they linked the 7th edition so I think we can put this to rest. 35drake (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in reference [15] 

message: Currently the second paragraph speaks about some fairly high-level concepts such as isentropic flows, irreversible processes, non-adiabatic processes, incompressible flows and compressible flows. In contrast, the third paragraph is confined to simpler concepts such as conservation of energy, kinetic energy, potential energy and internal energy. In the interests of WP:Make technical articles understandable, I feel these two paragraphs should be reversed - the third should become the second, and the second should become the third. I will make the change. Dolphin (t) 12:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears this suggested edit has already been done.  I would go further and move the current third paragraph (isentropic flows, irreversible processes, non-adiabatic processes, incompressible flows and compressible flows) to the end of the lead, moving current paragraphs four and five up to three and four. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 01:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I have no objection to the change you are proposing for the third paragraph. Dolphin (t) 07:50, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjustment to the lead
Talk:Tim Burton

message: Would someone please remove Elfman from the table?  He is techically not an actor, and he's listed for his scores. - Cartoon Boy (talk) -  2:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Elfman on table 

message: This link is a bit confusing with the comment that they "never married", a common-law marriage is still a legal marriage, should the link really be used or should this be reworded somewhat? ★Trekker (talk) 22:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common-law marriage?
Talk:Hiroshi Teshigahara

message: Arghghg, I swear -- it's petty and stupid -- but the ordering of Japanese names family_name given_name is probably going to end up driving me from Wikipedia (yeah, no big loss probably, but anyway...).  Teshigahara clearly wrote his name given_name family_name in English (1) and given that he was a consumate artist in everything he did, this ordering was clearly deliberate.  Hiroshi Teshigahara is not known as Teshigahara Hiroshi in English, and nor is this how he would have referred to himself.  -- Tlotoxl 04:00, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: The name game

message: I would like to add the fact that during Akira Kurosawa's 5 year hiatus from filmmaking before the movie Kagemusha (1980), Kurosawa watched a lot of televison and was deeply influenced by the final episode of Zatouichi - Journey of Dreams (新座頭市「夢の旅) (1978) directed by Teshigahara Hiroshi. This influence includes the original casting of Shintaro Katsu in the lead roles of Lord Takeda Shingen and Kagemusha, the thief and the extended artistic dream sequences. Nmollo (talk) 11:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teshigahara Hiroshi influence on Akira Kurosawa 
Talk:Sample

message: As it says on WP:DAB, "Disambiguation pages serve a single purpose: To let the reader choose between different pages that might reside under the same title." On that basis, I will continue to delete dab page material that doesn't serve that purpose. I'm pretty tired of arguing what should be a simple issue. ----Isaac R 06:11, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-dab stuff on dab page 

message: it took me a while to realize the link to sampling (music) is the sound link
Microsofkid (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a more visible link to Sampling (disambiguation). -- œ™ 02:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More obvious music sample link
Talk:Mascarpone

message: Where does Spanish fit into the geography here? User:Wetman
Lombardy was under Spanish domination when mascarpone was first produced (16th-17th century) Plch 12:49, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It was stated that the cheese is produced by fermentation with rennet.  This is incorrect, fermentation is a very specific metabolic process that occurs under anaerobic conditions.  A more suitable term is denaturation, which refers to a (often destructive) change in molecular structure due to environmental conditions.  Just wanted to clear that up.  --Halogenated 04:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fermentation 

message: Previous vandalism of the article was posted on Reddit, there is a chance some readers would edit the article and vandalize it in the same form.
Perhaps it should be protected temporarily.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.81.16 (talk) 07:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I doubt the Italians use a pint as a measure in their recipes. Even if they did, it's ambiguous (US/av.? ). Might be better to use an international standard measure. eg half a litre. 111.220.44.54 (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pint?
Talk:Forbidden City/Archive 1

message: How come there is no explanation of why it is called the forbidden city? 
--Cchipman 01:16, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I too would like to know this. It seems a pretty obvious question. - furrykef (Talk at me) 06:54, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is it called that

message: The Forbidden City was started by the Mongol Yuan dynasty, but this article perpetuates the incorrect notion that the Ming started
it. Supposedly, the palace was forbidden to Han Chinese as it was set up as a steppe environment so that the Mongol rulers could live as if they were still in the desert. These facts are from the book Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World by Jack Weatherford . Dyl 18:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fact? Yes the first palace on this site was built in the Yuan dynasty. However, the entire complex was burnt to the ground at the end of the Yuan, and a new palace was not built there until the Ming capital was moved to Beijing several decades later. The new palace is situated to the south of the Yuan palace (with a part overlapping). However, all surviving layout, buildings, and structures are from the Ming era or later. --Sumple (Talk) 06:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clearing that up. Shouldn't these facts be mentioned on the article? Dyl 23:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I'll see if I can dig up some references. --Sumple (Talk) 02:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Started under Yuan dynasty

message: There is a left parenthesis in the first paragraph of layout, with no matching right parenthesis. I'm not afraid to add one - but I can't really figure out where it should go. ClairSamoht 22:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: done. --Sumple (Talk) 22:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unmatched parens

message: The current Chinese wiki link points to the page for the "Palace Museum" (the institution) not the "Forbidden City" (the site). Do we need two separate pages on the English wikipedia? If not, which of those pages should the link point to? Discuss. 10 marks. --Sumple (Talk) 06:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palace Museum vs Forbidden City 

message: Can anyone verify that statement? I can't imagine where they'd chuck the starbucks. --Sumple (Talk) 00:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, I saw it there. It's not in the actual palace section; it's more like the courtyard. Heimstern Läufer 21:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Meridian Gate square? It would be good if we could find an exact location to ascertain whether it is in the actualy [[Forbidden City[[. --Sumple (Talk) 04:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The funny thing is that the Starbucks building is a symmetric counterpart of the old Grand Council chancellery on the west side of the gate to the Palace of Heavenly Purity. Just think about it, a Grand Concillour sneaking out for a coffee break, just before he has an appointment with his Boss.--Niohe 00:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starbucks in the Fobidden City?
Talk:Drum and bass

message: In the past year or so I have been noticing a steady upwards trend for this genre, in particular in its more 'poppy' form, as multiple songs that are at least inspired by it seem to be more and more popular and many have achieved what one could call mainstream popularity. At the same time, it does appear that djs are more likely to play sets that include this genre, particularly in the US, as more and more people seem to be interested in 'UK rave' music in general. I do not know if this is worth some mention in the 'History' subsection, considering what I have been writing about really might be anecdotal evidence, but there are multiple articles online talking about this phenomenon, and one can at least see from play and view counts that some tracks that are somewhat related to dnb have in fact become quite popular. Since I don't really know how to proceed, nor really how these kinds of editing processes work here, I would like to know your opinion on the matter, but at least it looks weird to me that the history described in the article really stops at the 'EDM' era so to speak, which is a looong time ago... Retermist (talk) 00:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some remarks of a possible resurgence, or at least popularity peak 

message: Check / validity of rephrasing of .
For reference, the sources in previous version of the sub-section / list item Drill 'n' bass are  and . 
Thanks and happy editing, Shazback (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit phrasing check 

message: This is probably the first paragraphs or sections having the maintenance template tag ‘more citations needed’. For a well-known EDM genre like this, even though there are citations for ~80 references, some citation bots will probably help us out on this, and generally speaking, I like this music genre myself. Sir Hypredereux (talk) 16:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More citations needed