lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kuroi Jukai

message: Why did I dreated this page? I just dislike the "dead links". 
Actually, all I could type in that article is already in the 
[];
it is much less than in the Japanese version...
May be, it is easier to remove the doubled rectangle brackets from around the words Kuroi Jukai ?
Then, we do not need the article  Kuroi Jukai... 
What paer of his (her) body did the creator of Aokigahara use when he (or she)
put the double square parenthesis arounf words  Kuroi Jukai?
The same I would say about  Ki no Umi and Takimoto Tomoyuki.
Now these links are absent...
Hey, Japanese patriots, Japanese literators, or anybody fluent in the Japanese literature!
Will you fill the  Kuroi Jukai with short description of the novel and teh movie mentioned,
or delete all links to this  Kuroi Jukai from Wiki?
Couls you help to create/recover articles these links?
ドそ　　てつだい！
Помогите, пожалуйста!
Aun una version en espanol pudria ser util...
dima 13:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana

message: I propose that Aquí comiença un vocabulario en la lengua castellana y mexicana be merged into Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana. I think that the content in the "Aquí comiença..." article can easily be explained in the context of "Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana", and the "Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana" article is of a reasonable size that the merging of "Aquí comiença.." will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Also, "Aquí comiença.." book is in reality the earliest edition of the "Vocabulario". Diana rz (talk) 23:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: It looks like UCM changed their base url to https://www.ucm.es/, and the library to https://biblioteca.ucm.es/. I eventually found the digitized book online at the biblioteca by signing in through my account at my own university but it took several steps. I am reluctant to change the link on the wiki page because it does require credentialing and some extra steps that cannot be provided easily in one link. However, the copy at the Archive/Wayback Machine downloads perfectly well though it is not searchable. (I was able to use OCR software to remedy that but a working knowledge of 16th century Spanish orthography is essential to successful searching within the text.)Amaling (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside link to the Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Talk:USS S-44

message: The list of sailors killed on USS S-44 has been removed.  Does anyone object to restoring the list?  Jason M. Smith 21:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NOTAMEMORIAL, "Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such requirements" (that being GNG). So no, the list doesn't belong in my opinion. Otherwise we'd create a system where every incident that results in death would have a list of those who died on it. Llammakey (talk) 12:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That's talking about "Subjects of encyclopedia articles" so I don't think it applies here. Kendall-K1 (talk) 13:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bad idea, unless you want a list of everyone who died aboard Titanic or Arizona, too. There are memorial sites online; link to one.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 05:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree – it doesn't belong here. Mojoworker (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure what Wiki's policy is...
I recently learned that at least one officer while serving on the S-44 was awarded a Silver Star   ... is this sort of information appropriate to be considered for inclusion, or not?  -hh (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be, if he has a page, where it belongs. Otherwise, it's too trivial for the boat page.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 22:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individuals Who Served
Talk:Semi-rigid molecule

message: The article is a stub. I would like to add in the future ammonia and its "umbrella" motion and methyl rotation in ethane as examples of floppy motions. Also a reference to, plus article on, Wilson's FG method would be nice. --P.wormer 13:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2007 comment 

message: I see that you rated over 200 spectroscopy related articles in one day. My question is: did you actually read those articles? If not, how did you establish quality and importance? Same question if you did read them.--P.wormer 16:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question to Kkmurray 

message: As far as I can understand, this article is about normal chemical species (ions, molecules) that do not exists as other conformers or isomers.  This is the default case for chemical compounds.  The case is so default that we dont talk about them. Now maybe I am missing something.  So my recommendation is that the article be converted to a redirect to fluxional molecule (which also includes ions).
One key aspect leading to this recommendation is that the article fails to cite a source of the term or concept of "semi-rigid molecule".
--Smokefoot (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge given that the concept of semi-rigid molecule only exists because of the existence of fluxional molecule. They are therefore antonyms and could be discussed together, leaving a Template:R from antonym on the semi-rigid molecule page. I suggest a separate section for semi-rigid molecule. Klbrain (talk) 03:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Udo Lindenberg

message: Tried to change de:Udo Lindenberg. Damn W/P won't let it change. So here you have the correct link. Ozdaren 13:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I've begun translating from the German W/P site. Feel free to add more chapters. I'll update as I find time. Ozdaren 13:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[de:Udo Lindenberg]]
Talk:Lincoln Continental Mark V

message: Clearly I have a strong affinity for these vehicles and felt it necessary to expand the informational text of this article. Previously, I have added the "Collector's Series" information, the "Diamond Jubilee Edition" information, and, more recently, the "Miles-To-Empty" feature information. These were absolutely beautiful cars.MJEH (talk) 01:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lincoln Continental Mark V Designer Editions sections 

message: Seems to me the weight of the car compared to the mk iv is not really a significant part of the article. Maybe something stemming from a forum argument somewhere. The section should probably be incorporated into the article body, as a table, and without the information on the mk iv weight. I'm not sure most people who come to this page do so because they want an in-depth analysis of the year-to-year weight fluctuations of an old Lincoln.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.17.140 (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I can agree with that reasoning entirely; while it doesn't need to be relegated to a footnote, it shouldn't be half the lead section of the article (as it sits now).  That's just one of the things that needs to be fixed in the article, starting from the ground up. --SteveCof00  (talk) 07:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight 

message: When looking at this article with a neutral point of view, it is one that is overtaken by one thing: the explanation of the (numerous?) special editions of this car that were offered.  It's not that that is necessarily disagreeable, but not only 3/4 of the article dedicated towards this subject, but what is written about them reads almost like a dealer brochure.  A little balance would be desirable, with perhaps a greater amount of information about the Lincoln Continental Mark V itself (its development, specifications, and production?).  Again, let's just try to balance things out here.  --SteveCof00 (talk)  11:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Changing the page  While it may look like a lot of information is gone, it's still here.  It's just a lot better formatted and can show things side by side without having to scroll endlessly.  For now, this clears out a LOT of room to make this an article about the car itself, about its development, mechanical layout, etc.  In other words, it can now be like a good car article on here. --SteveCof00 (talk)  10:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the article/explaining the tags
Talk:Iowa House of Representatives

message: Just wanted to add that most of the ranking members in the committee leadership section is not up to date. A lot of the people listed where voted out and have been replaced with other minority representatives. 2604:2D80:5311:2300:B595:7323:2389:2558 (talk) 04:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking members not up to date
Talk:List of ships named USS Arizona

message: Anyone else think this article should redirect to USS Arizona (BB-39) the one sank during Pearl Harbor?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasha Callahan (talk • contribs) 02:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because this is a disambiguation page to direct people to all the ships named Arizona in the US Navy.-MBK004 21:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: Rewrote the opening paragraph which previously said that all three were named for the State of Arizona then proceeded to explain that Arizona was not a state when the first two were commissioned.Irish Melkite (talk) 22:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Has the Navy said anything about CVN-79 being named Arizona? La Maupin (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CVN-79 

message: Resurrecting an old idea, but what does anyone think about moving this to USS Arizona (disambiguation) and moving USS Arizona (BB-39) to this title, given the latter's significance? Shereth 18:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Sisson Documents

message: Does anyone seriously contend that these were not forgeries? If so, they need to be cited. If not, we can add the categories for "Political forgery" and "False documents". Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling them "truthful" because "they were based on real occurrences" makes no sense. If I forged a note by Lee Harvey Oswald to the effect that tomorrow he is going to assassinate JFK and that no one else but him was involved in this decision, it would still be a fictitious document whether one supports that he was a lone gunman or not, simply because he never wrote that note. Similarly, if there never was a January 8, 1918 payment of 50,000,000 gold roubles to the Soviet government by a representative of the Imperial Bank named G. von Schanz (to give just one example of the Sisson Documents), then the only logical conclusion is that such a document is fake. It remains as fake now as it did over 100 years ago. --Ismail (talk) 14:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgeries? 

message: While these articles were a forgery in a technical sense, Trotsky and Lenin were not German agents, Germany did play a very real role in the Bolshevik Revolution... not least helping Lenin get back from Switzerland; see Alexander Parvus, Yakov Ganetsky, Karl Radek and Arthur Zimmermann. We need to put more context the purpose of Sisson's Documents and Kennan's statements. Both of these were US government sources and at the time Sisson exaggerating the German role would have been useful propaganda for the Americans/British... but by the time of Keenan this was no longer useful because of the Cold War, Marshall Plan and use of West Germany as an Anglo-American proxy. The way the article is currently written you don't get this context, that it was essentially American propaganda, based on a kernel of truth, which later became surplus to requirements. Claíomh Solais (talk) 16:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keenan
Talk:The Musings of Miles

message: The Miles Davis Chronology is messed up. I'm trying to figure out which is his debut album, and while clicking on what appears to be his earliest album, it shows an earlier album in the Chronology. If you click on that and all coming "previous" albums, I find that it takes me forward in time, thus not previous in the Chronology, and then I also noticed, that it becomes a loop of maybe a dozen albums. It's strange, to say the least.24.12.72.50 (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Songs of Time

message: Ive uploaded the album cover art to wikipedia. The filename is "songsoftimecover.jpg" .
However, im a pretty big wiki noob and I dont know how to make the infobox and put the picture in it.
:Note - infobox & picture included... thank you for the upload! SkierRMH 03:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rajnath Singh

message: Some links aired dead  links, more reference should be added (Alex.mathews (talk) 13:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WP:GAN#POL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puinjab (talk • contribs) 08:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: removing recently placed  template for the October 12 GA nomination, since no review was ever opened and nominator Puinjab was blocked as a sockpuppet. What should normally happen in such situations, provided that a reviewer has not already opened a review page, is that the  template, added by the sock, be removed. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renomination of article of [[Rajnath Singh]] as [[WP:GA|Good Article]]. 

message: Dreamy Jazz I noticed your hardwork in the article of Rajnath Singh and want to tell you that in the Commons category of Sister Project link, there is an error in Wikimedia Commons link. It should be Rajnath Singh, but it is written Category:Rajnath Singh and due to this the users (specially new beginners) won't get his Commons page.TunakTunak (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy Jazz]] talk to me | my contributions 14:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rajnath Singh correction in Sister's Project 
Talk:1989 United States Grand Prix

message: The "summary" section is dotted with block quotes, but there's no indication where the quotes come from. Are they from the Rob Walker book listed in the references section, or somewhere else, or are they not supposed to be blockquotes at all? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: Under the 1989 and 1990 us grand prix articles, the track map displayed is wrong. It is missing several turns at the start, where, rather than a chicane, it was a 90 degree right hander followed by two left handers and a tight right back onto Jefferson St.  The obsolete map also shows the 1991 layout, with the correct '89/'90 layout faded in grey. I'm unsure of how to fix this using the same map displayed.(Dj vicious (talk) 02:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  track map for 1989/1990/obsolete versions wrong
Talk:Wroughton

message: So that's coming out, along with the restaurants. That's just silly. Rob Burbidge 13:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't believe the chip shop is worth mentioning ...

message: For anyone who wants to research this a bit further, you could start here. http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1730215. I don't have the compentency to decide if this content is useful or not.
Surely on a page as small as this any extra knowlege is if not needed then understandable?(Downforthecount182 18:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Ellendune
Template talk:Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets football coach navbox

message: The information for several years regarding early Georgia Tech coaches is inaccurate. I think the reason is that the info is pulled from online databases (such as the College Football Warehouse), which takes its facts from the Georgia Tech's media guide.  However, the media guide has been found to be inaccurate in many cases regarding early coaches and is contradicted by contemporary newspaper articles in the Atlanta Journal Constitution as well as alumni letters. I frankly trust the newspaper much more than the media guide that was written 90-100 years later. A brief summary:
Year	Current        	Correct           	Notes                                                                         	Source
1892	Ernest West    	Ernest West       	No discrepancy found                                                          	Griffin (1934)
1893	Spain & Wood   	Leonard Wood      	Spain only raised money for team                                              	Mealor (1933)
1894	Spain & Wood   	No coach          	No record Wood on team;Spain resigned as prof before season to become an actor	Griffin (1934); AJC September 19, 1894
1895	No team        	No team           	No discrepancy found                                                          	--
1896	No coach       	J. B. Wood        	Professor at Tech                                                             	AJC September 26, 1896
1897	No coach       	J. B. Wood        	Professor at Georgia Tech                                                     	AJC October 11, 1897; Griffin (1934); Ferris (1971)
1898	Rufus Nalley   	No coach          	No record of Nalley until 1899                                                	--
1899	H. T. Collier  	Rufus "Cow" Nalley	Collier is Tulane coach in 1899                                               	Griffin (1934), AJC September 18, 1899
1900	No coach       	Harris Collier    	Sometimes "Mr. Collier" or "H. T. Collier"                                    	AJC September 19, 1900
1901	Cyrus Strickler	John McKee        	No record Strickler ever involved with program                                	AJC November 25, 1901
1902	John McKee     	George Andree     	AJC has picture and long bio                                                  	AJC September 27 and October 7, 1902
1903	No coach       	Oliver Huie       	Former Tech player                                                            	AJC October 4, 1903
PJLazy (talk) 08:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for this PJ. I try to research old southern football and was dumbfounded by the discrepancy between the media guide and the wiki. Andree and Collier are some big names for them to miss. Cake (talk) 11:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Coaches 

message: If Mac McWhorter is included in the template, even though he only coached for one game, then shouldn't Jon Tenuta also be included in the navbox? Tenuta was the interim coach for last year's bowl game in Boise, which is precisely what McWhorter did for the Seattle Bowl. _-Z-_ (talk) 18:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jon Tenuta
Talk:History of 19th-century congressional redistricting in Ohio

message: I have become aware of some possible errors:
* For 1880-1882, Clermont and Ross counties are not listed.
* For 1886-1890, Allen county is missing, possibly in 4th?
* For 1890-1892, Lorain, Summit, Portage, and Mahoning counties may be listed twice.
You may contact me or User talk:Bearian. Bearian'sBooties 03:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible errors 

message: Would there be any objection to moving this article to History of 19th-century congressional redistricting in Ohio? Since 19th and century are working together as a compound adjective before the noun redistricting, it should be hyphenated. History of 19th century congressional redistricting in Ohio would remain as a redirect to the new title. If there's a consensus, or at least no objection, I'll make the move in about a week. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''19th century'' to ''19th-century''
Talk:Thripidae

message: Anyone know who the Stevens is? Shyamal (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone already set it to James Francis Stephens. If that was you, thank you! I can see that you've been busy cleaning up taxonomic authorities all over. I personally find that very helpful - and rather interesting to learn a little more about the taxonomists of yore. Aderksen (talk) 05:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author
Talk:Series acceleration

message: There's a method (or rather, a collection of methods), due to Cohen, Rodriguez Villegas and Zagier, which beats the Euler-type methods by quite a way. I don't have the reference to hand, but can find it without too much difficulty. It's worth a mention, for its use with alternating series! Hair Commodore 13:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Villegas and Zagier are number theorists; is this a paper on series acceleration for special functions/hypergeometric series, or is it a numerical methods paper? linas 16:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cohen, Rodriguez Villegas and Zagier method 

message: I am merging to sequence transformations. That is a more substantial article, and series acceleration is a special case. Loisel 06:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging to sequence transformations 

message: In my opinion, it is misleading to redirect "Acceleration of convergence" to "Series acceleration". The reason is that there are many convergence acceleration issues that have nothing to do with series. Think of iteration sequences, of Romberg integration and, more generally, slowly converging sequences. Also, thinking not only of sequence numbers but of other objects like sequence of vectors, of matrices, of operators makes sense in the "Acceleration of convergence" context that is valid for objects living in spaces where you can talk about convergence.
Therefore, I propose to replace the redirection by a separate page for "Acceleration of convergence" and include links the present page. I remark that the latter was in large parts copied from an old version of "sequence transformation".
DerHannes (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous redirection of "Acceleration of convergence" to "Series acceleration"
Talk:Minkey

message: Trying to decide whether to refocus this article slightly.  Mini hockey in England still uses a half-size pitch, but may be used for children up to 13, and uses full-sized goals and retains the D and penalty corner of normal hockey.  David Underdown 14:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mini hockey in South Africa still uses a half-size pitchhttps://sashoc.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/SA%20Hockey%20Fundamental%20Coaching%20framework.pdf Axxter99 Axxter99 (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: refocus this article