lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sealaska Corporation

message: I just found this book review on the Sealaska Heritage Institute's Celebration (Alaska festival) and wonder if it should be in the subsidiaries table here; but it's not a company, but a cultural institute; whatever, I don't know enough about it to write an article; sounds like the Celebration event needs one too, but again I don't know enough to write the article.Skookum1 (talk) 03:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Sealaska Heritage Institute]]
Talk:Vinod Kambli

message: Dear Wikipedia Editor,
      Could it be possible to add some more history like Personal Data of an indivisual or like a persons childhood and the present life more detailed career life
Thanks & Regards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.187.141.11 (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dear Wikipedia 

message: Something looks a bit odd around this edit. The formatting of that schooldays etc section as it is now makes it look like a copy/paste from somewhere and, of course, the citation method is bizarre. I realise that this is likely to be the product of someone new to Wikipedia but I am unsure how to proceed because the wording is scattered all over the web, sometimes in obvious mirrors of Wikipedia and sometimes not. I don't have the time to see if this is a copy/paste from the article history (ie: reinstating something that was in the article previously). It needs to be sorted out, though. - Sitush (talk) 12:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/paste? 

message: I have removed the recently added content which has been removed by others frequently. There are no sources to confirm the caste of Vinod Kambli, and per WP:BLPCAT the caste has to be admitted by himself. I have tried to find better sources for this but whatever I have found shows that Kambli is not actually a Dalit, but a fisherman caste. "Kambli, it appears, is from a fisherman caste and technically not Scheduled Caste", says this book. Capitals00 (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Caste
Talk:Garage kit

message: Would anyone like to take on the task of getting the article up to wiki standards of quality?
I currently don't have any pictures other then what could be found on the web, and i'm not sure what the copyright issues would be in this regard. Tani unit 02:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the link; the links on how to buy each kit made the link more like a store.  As such, it doesn't pass WP:EL - the external link guidelines.  The site looks nice, hopefully search engines rank it appropriately. --GargoyleMT 22:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikifying 

message: I added a link to http://www.garagekits.us and it was taken down.  This is a great site that not only expands on what garage kits are but, offers tutorials and more info on what is out there as far as kits go, and what the garage kit community is like...Ashley76 20:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the link; the links on how to buy each kit made the link more like a store.  As such, it doesn't pass WP:EL - the external link guidelines.  The site looks nice, hopefully search engines rank it appropriately. --GargoyleMT 22:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ashley76

message: The Japan section starts with a statement that is highly prejudiced and misleadingly worded (18+ works at Wonder Festival count for maybe 10% of the entire event). It then rambles into "but it also has this, and some of this, and sometimes this" which is all vague. The statement on "dominant scales" is pure nonsense, as is "preferably with an airbrush". There is no mention of extremely important topics such as how copyright regarding fan works of existing properties is handled in the country. The section is in dire need of a rewrite which would involve removing a huge swath of what is already there. 2404:2D00:5000:701:B9D2:5B05:FC57:BA04 (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan section is a mess
Talk:Frederick Pabst

message: * New International Encyclopedia claims that Pabst Brewing Company arose in 1874, not 1889, ergo, I have erased the year 1889.  Superslum 15:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Philip Best (about whom no one seems to have written an article yet . . .) started the Best Brewing Company in 1874. After his death, Pabst (who had married Philip's daughter, Maria) took on the co-management of the company. When his partner died in 1889, he changed the name to Pabst Brewing Company. --Michael K. Smith 17:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sources vary on how many children Pabst had. I included quotes in the citations for the three sources used, one of which says 10 children (the Pabst Mansion); one 11 (Chicago Tribune), and one 12 (The Successful American). Since there is really no basis for asserting that one source is more reliable than another, the text must reflect their differences. 32.218.43.54 (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of children 

message: This was on the page with no citation: "The beer never actually won a blue ribbon. During some festivals (i.e. World's Fair in Chicago), Pabst placed a blue ribbon around his Best beer (named after founder Phillip Best) so it would stand out among the others. People would start identifying the beer as the Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. Instead of correcting the public, Pabst just wisely renamed it."
The German Historical Institute's biography of Pabst cites Thomas Cochran, The Pabst Brewing Company. The History of an American Business (New York: New York University Press, 1948), p.  137, 177, 217, 425, stating that it was the employees who originally tied a blue silk ribbon around the bottles. The Pabst Blue Ribbon Wikipedia page says it's not really clear when this started, but that it was definitely Captain Pabst who did this, citing a Smithsonian article that claims that Pabst won a blue ribbon at the Columbian Exhibition. Thoughts, anyone?
Thellomerca (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Ribbon myth
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Brossow

message: Against my better judgment but in the interest of providing a level playing field, I have removed two early votes apparently cast by recently registered friends or acquaintances despite my specific request that this NOT happen. I wanted to leave them in place but fear that their appearance on the page was unduly prejudicial against me.  I hope people can now vote based on my record and not on the actions of others. ⇒ BRossow T/C 22:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes,that's why I voted (note that this is not a vote) support now. --Latinus 22:35, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prejudicial early votes 

message: Just food for thought: in practical terms, what is the difference in experience between someone with 2800+ edits over a couple months' time and someone with the same number of edits spread over, say, six months or a year?  The time spent working on Wikipedia would be about the same either way.  The commitment to improving and helping would, if anything, be better demonstrated by the person who has spent several hours a day in many cases than by the person who makes far fewer edits here and there.  Many people have had successful RFAs with far fewer edits and, in terms of actual time spent working at Wikipedia, far less practical experience. Again, just something to think about. It's mostly a rhetorical question, though if someone has an answer I'd genuinely appreciate the feedback, because I'm not at all sure I understand some of the opposition here. --BRossow 14:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experience
Talk:Francisco de Carondelet

message: The slightly longer material from the other page should be merged into this page, of course. I've refrained from adding it by hand because we're not supposed to! Bill 21:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be happy to assist in a proper page move if you request and no one else offers a good reason to object. However in the mean time I don't think we should have seperate forking articles. See also: Talk:Francisco Luis Hector for discussion. -- Infrogmation 22:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from the other (misnamed) article
Talk:Tibetan tangka

message: * 10 Shokay = 1 Srang
* 1 1/2 Shokang = 1 Tangka Böri (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currency in the past 
Talk:Department of the Pacific

message: For the changes made today, refer to Category_talk:Campaigns_of_the_Pacific_Coast_Theater_of_the_American_Civil_War. evrik 21:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Changes 

message: I'm working on setting up a Department of the West.  My understanding is that is responsiblity stretched past the Rockies to the border of California.  Department of the West was responsible for the Utah War and various Indian conflicts that were west of the Rockies.  Americasroof 14:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: West of the Rockies?

message: Was it not reborn before the Civil War?--172.190.221.236 (talk) 00:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebirth
Talk:History of molecular biology

message: I will gather some info on early 60s work of Jacques Fresco at Princeton Anlace 17:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Messenger RNA work

message: I added the "Molecular Genetics" section to the Linus Pauling entry - the first association of a protein difference with an inherited disease. This is, it seems to me, a basic item in the history of molecular biology. --Dumarest 14:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A gene and a protein and a disease

message: This article appears to cover a great deal of material also covered at Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid.  Why do we have two articles? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:18, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content forking 

message: In the article History_of_molecular_biology#Discovery of the structure of DNA, This set of questionable additions occurred on 3 December 2015. --Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 10:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable addition to Discovery of the structure of DNA
Talk:Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Silk Stocking

message: Having just watched this, I was struck by how influenced it was by more modern detective stories. The killer's psyche is analysed, and his 'modus operandi' deduced. The killer himself has a foot fetish, and one of the characters lends Sherlock a book on sexual deviances, in the act mentioning many things that would never appear in a Conan Doyle book.
However, my favourite aspect has to be Watson; Ian Hart portrays him as a much more intelligent and insightful character than the bumbling foil that he is normally depicted as. (TimTim 21:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think it's been a few years since he was regularly depicted as a bumbler. The performances of David Burke and Edward Hardwicke in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, certainly, seem to have helped redeem the character greatly in this respect. Angmering 22:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: [Spoiler] I removed the assertion that Holmes' character is different from other interpretations because the only evidence given was that he has a "ruthless edge" manifested by his shooting of the villain. He shot the villain in the leg, clearly in self-defense, not in cold blood or ruthlessly. Without that one example, the assertion is unsupported. Also, the interpretation of the shooting as ruthless seems contentious at best. dweinberger (talk) 02:34, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holmes' character 
Talk:State of Alert

message: I know there's always been a debate on what the official name of the band is, but I believe the proper name is S.O.A. and not State of Alert. First, on the No Policy EP cover it says "S.O.A." Also, in all the interviews and memoirs I have seen or read by people from the scene at the time (Henry Rollins, Jeff Nelson, Ian MacKaye, etc.) they have always referred to the band as "S.O.A." As such, I propose that the title of this article is changed to S.O.A.
Wall Screamer (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Talk:FeedSync

message: heya,
have added an attention tag to this page as feel it does not seem encyclopaedic, but rather feels like random notes written down by someone while browsing introductions to this technology. not enough info on why this arose, who is involved, what technical differences it has with existing standards, etc. don't know enough personally to be able to improve it but am hoping someone out there does. --Black Butterfly 22:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Isn't the name of the extensions Simple List Extensions, and not Simple Sharing extensions as proclaimed by the article? --Soumyasch 04:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Castle Cove, New South Wales

message: Hi there readers and editors. An anonymous user has been adding the term “upscale” to the lede to summarise the suburbs article. This has been reverted countless times by many editors to only have the term be added into the lede again and again. Just to give clarity on why the term is irrelevant and being removed; it does not summarise the article of the Sydney suburb; the term is far too subjective and is more of a personally opinionated term to describe a place; there are no resources provided to support the claim that the suburb is so called “upscale”; the term simply does not belong in the lede of the article. Should the term “upscale” be placed in an article to describe a place, it should be in the body of the article with resourced citation to support the description of the suburb, which should also elaborate how the suburb is “upscale”. Cheers HornsbyBbSyd (talk) 11:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And it's still going on. I'm requesting another article protection. Meters (talk) 07:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous editor: “upscale”
Talk:Vazov Point

message: "Non-notable point with a rock on it in Antarctica, supplied by the 'Antarctic Place-names Commission of Bulgaria'. Also unreferenced."
(1)  The article IS referenced.  Sources given: (a) the SCAR Composite Antarctic Gazetteer; and (b) Antarctic Place-names Commission of Bulgaria.  A Google search would provide links to the respective websites corroborating the article's substance;
(2)  This article has been tagged for wikification.  It belongs to a group of articles presently being wikified by Kcordina; in the process, reference links to both (a) and (b) are appended, as well as the link to a third source (c), the electronic version of a published map showing this particular feature;
(3)  Antarctic geographical features that have official names can hardly be regarded as 'non-notable'.  Place naming policies for Antarctica are fairly conservative,  names are given to features ranked as if "of national significance" and correspondingly formally approved by ministers of inferior, inter-ministerial bodies or other similar authorities (in the case of Bulgaria it's the President of the Republic). Apcbg 22:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: SCAR site has moved here, maybe Vazov Point and Vazov Rock are good candidates for external links. Doncho Nicolaev Gunchev 23:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you are right, the SCAR Gazetteer is now hosted by the Australian Antarctic Division, and it would be nice to have that updated everywhere.  Furthermore, it would be even better if links to the individual gazetteer entries were given as you suggest for these two particular features. Apcbg (talk) 10:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SCAR Antarctic Gazetteer references
Talk:Vazov Rock

message: "Non-notable hill in Antarctica, supplied by the 'Antarctic Place-names Commission of Bulgaria'. Also unreferenced."
(1)  The article IS referenced.  Sources given: (a) the SCAR Composite Antarctic Gazetteer; and (b) Antarctic Place-names Commission of Bulgaria.  A Google search would provide links to the respective websites corroborating the article's substance;
(2)  This article has been tagged for wikification.  It belongs to a group of articles presently being wikified by Kcordina.  In the process, reference links to both (a) and (b) are appended, as well as the link to a third source (c), the electronic version of a published map showing this particular feature;
(3)  Antarctic geographical features that have official names can hardly be regarded as 'non-notable'.  Place naming policies for Antarctica are fairly conservative,  names are given to features ranked as if "of national significance" and correspondingly formally approved by ministers of inferior, inter-ministerial bodies or other similar authorities (in the case of Bulgaria it's the President of the Republic). Apcbg 22:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Dunbar

message: Hi, I have restored the request for a citation on survival of James. You say in your edit-description there is a reference to the Regent Albany in one of Dunbar's poems and I'm grateful for that, but please can you supply this in the article as a reference (which poem and what line(s) and why it works as a reference). 
I have similarly added a request for citation that he was in the "post" of laureate. Again it may be my ignorance, but I am not aware that there was a "post" of laureate as such in James's court, or who the "official" holders were, if any. (Dunbar was not the only poet in the court.) Again I am not doubting, it is simply a request. 
Please supply the citations rather than remove the requests. Would be grateful. Thank-you. Stitchill (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for citations

message: "The praise, though it has been at times exaggerated, is on the whole just, certainly in respect of variety of work and mastery of form."
I am rather annoyed by the number of Wiki biographies that presume to pass judgement on the merit of so-and-so's work.  Some, like Scott, clearly exalt Dunbar.  Others may think he's rubbish.  But may I suggest confining one's opinions on the literary merit of a poet('s works) to the pages of a thesis or an article in a journal rather than Wiki entries.
I am taking the liberty to delete that excerpt: if anyone disagrees, feel free to raise why. Gaylegoh (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjectivity

message: The Douglas who died in 1522 is perhaps Gavin Douglas? --FinnWiki 01:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And "...Scott's eulogy...", perhaps this Scott is Walter Scott? --FinnWiki 09:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bothwell's mission... Bothwell who? --FinnWiki 12:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification
Talk:Robert B. Meyner

message: I take it I was wrong about the standard being to link every year, the first time that year comes up. But why insert Hoffman's middle initial in the displayed text? (I'm not the one who edited that section; I'm not complaining about you editing my work.) Unlike some politicians, Hoffman was rarely referred to with his middle initial. Often enough, perhaps, to justify the initial's inclusion in the title of his own page, but not, IMO, in a this sort of reference on another page. Dvd Avins 22:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been working on this page in the conext of Wikiproject New Jersey, which is aimed at filling in the holes and expanding details regarding all things New Jersey. You are invited to contribute in any way to this effort. In general, per the Manual of Style, years should only be linked where it adds to the article. The article for Harold G. Hoffman may have been named out of ignorance, and should refer to the person as most people would use the name. We could do a move, if appropriate, to rename the page. Though it can help distinguish this Harold Hoffman from others with the same name. Let me know if I can help with anything else. Alansohn 05:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting issues 
Talk:1949 NASCAR Strictly Stock Series

message: Start-class as there is info on all the races. High importance since this was the first season of what became the Grand National/Winston Cup/Nextel Cup Series. --Coredesat talk. o_O 21:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Relative computability

message: Arithmetical hierarchy links to co-A-recursive sets, which redirects here, but this article doesn't define co-A-recursive sets.--Bcrowell 22:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment, only the redlink above links to co-A-recursive sets, which is good because a set is co-A-recursive if and only if it is A-recursive. CMummert 22:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: co-A-recursive sets
Talk:Uqba ibn Nafi

message: Why you Remove Arab Byzantine Wars And Battle of Heliopolis in Battle of Uqba ibn Nafi 119.152.49.89 (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I already explained why in my edit summary, which says "removed what's unsourced and not mentioned in either the article's body or the linked articles". The question you should be asking yourself is: why are you adding unsourced content? M.Bitton (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uqba ibn Nafi 

message: Is amr bin aas the nephew or the half brother of uqba 2A02:C7C:AEFF:5500:1D1:DA74:71C8:DB62 (talk) 02:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uqba bin nafi
Talk:Raid on Los Baños

message: I am seeking someone who has a family history related to this raid. My family was interned there and was rescued. Please visit my talk page. -- Fyslee/talk 13:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more details 

message: The first section reads "The 250 Japanese in the garrison were killed." However later we read about the guards who escaped. Therefore it does not seem likely that all 250 in the garrison were killed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.137.1.28 (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualty numbers of Japanese guards