Talk:David Sklansky

message: Watch out, there are some 2+2 patrons who are upset with Sklansky's musings in the twoplustwo.com Science page and are trying to insert disparaging and personally insulting comments  in his Wikipedia entry.
Can someone track down a more recent picture of Sklansky than the almost 30 year old one on this page?
:I think the entire point to a Wiki is that if you see something that should be changed, you can come in and change it. (Rather than coming in and asking someone else to change it.) In other words, feel free to update the picture. Rray 04:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: I have removed the "claims" section.  Neither claim is cited and so must be removed from biographies of living people, as per wikipedia policy.  Even if cited, however, I'm not sure they are all that relevant.  If we had a longer article and discussed the details of Sklansky's contributions in more detail this might be appropriate.  Merely suggesting that he is vain without any discussion of the source of that supposed vanity is overly biased, in my opinion.  --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 22:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good move - I agree. Rray 23:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims section 

message: I just read that Sklansky had offered a wager that there would be no fundamentalist Christian able to best him at GRE or SAT.  Anyone know anything about that?
The bet is in 2 parts;
(1) The person has to pass a lie detector test in which they claim they are 95% Confident of the resurrection of Christ & also they are 95% confident that only those who believe in the resurrection will go to heaven
(2) They must sit those tests & do better than Sklansky. $50k if they beat him $2k if they tie
His theory is that Fundamentalist Christians are less likely to be brilliant scientists than Asians, Jews or Atheists. Presumably because of the seeming irrationality of their core beliefs?
sorry, i think david skansky is not an author ... he writed a lot of book on poker but he is a mathematic (i don't know very well english but you understood ;) --82.91.173.242 12:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? Sklansky being an author isn't a matter of opinion; it's a fact. People who write books that are then published are, by definitions, authors. Rray 02:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bet against Christian Fundamentalists 

message: this certainly deserves a section.
(links removed, --Enric Naval (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an encyclopedia, not a gossip magazine. If information about his sexual relationships is notable and covered in reliable sources, they can be included. But a large number of gossipy Google results does not necessarily merit inclusion. Rray (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't link to gossip, even if it's a google search. It's clear now that this stuff is not going to make it into the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Sklansky odd sexual relationships 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on David Sklansky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100520034230/http://lepoker.tv:80/poker-videos-300-Conversation-avec-David-Sklansky to http://lepoker.tv/poker-videos-300-Conversation-avec-David-Sklansky
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Page is archived, but dysfunctional, video does not play / not available WurmWoodeT 13:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified