Talk:Dune II

message: The Amiga port was also known as Battle for Arrakis at least in Europe. I don't know about Merka. — JIP | Talk 09:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle for Arrakis

message: I have no idea why, but the image :Image:Dune2intro.png in the intro doesn't render properly in firefox, although it is fine with opera and ie. Anyone got any ideas regarding a solution to this? Jacoplane 07:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, seems to work now. Jacoplane 17:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm actually it's not displaying in Firefox for me any longer. Does anyone else have issues with this image? jacoplane 20:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

text: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ad/Dune2intro.png works... jacoplane 20:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

text: It's not displaying for me either - and I use Maxthon. Do you have any idea why this is happening? --Zoz (t) 18:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have this problem occassionalyl on wikipedia. I use firefox/ It doesnt really make sense. I even tried reuploading these images and to no avail. This is a much larger issue than just this specific case. --larsinio (poke)(prod) 20:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's much larger than a specific case. E.g. about half of the Transylvania gallery isn't displaying for me either. Maybe we should report this as a bug, then? But I'm not sure where to complain. --Zoz (t) 10:38, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image rendering in Firefox 

message: Isn't it a copyvio to quote whole paragraphs from the game manual? --Zoz (t) 10:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the game manual? 

message: I added a bit about the deviator "cheat", although this really isn't a cheat per-se, because it's more of a bug. I didn't want to add a whole bug section. --GTPoompt 15:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deviator Cheat 

message: In the past my favourite was the long-term 'starvation' tactic, that is, letting the AI costantly send units into my wall of rocket turrets. Once the stream of units stopped, that meant that the AI has spent everything and so couldn't put up a defense (or repair buildings) when I attacked. So the 'infinite credits' accusation is false.
I replayed it this week, going for a fast, perfectionist strategy that consisted of quickly deploying 4+ harvesters and then carryalls to speed it up even more. Yet after each mission, statistics said that the opponent was able to match my spice income pretty well. Which is kinda surprising because every time there was only one refinery with a single harvester in the opponent's base. Thus it appears that the AI receives more credits for harvested spice than the player does.
It also seems that the AI begins with an already built base, so it doesn't need to invest credits into base construction.  --theultramage 11:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite credits? 

message: I havent played the game for other platforms, but i know that there are some biult in cheats for the genesis version
You just enter in one of the special cheats into the password box (which is normally used to load games)
They include chaets for infinite credits, invincible vehicles and a completely uncovered map Mr toasty 06:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sega Genesis cheats 

message: I think it should be added that both the Atreides and Harkonnen special units can be constructed from a captured Sardaukar heavy factory.
Also, though I don't know if this breaks the original research rule, I know from experience that the Ordos Deviator turns any unit it hits to ORDOS side, instead of the side of the unit that hit it. This makes capturing Ordos weapons factory to construct the Deviator uttterly useless.
(apparently the WW team knew this, as the unit can't be built when capturing the Sardaukar factory)
I don't know if a similar tech mix applies to a captured Sardaukar Light factory, which theoretically could allow the player to build the Ordos-specific Raider Trike.
Nyerguds 19:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sardaukar captured tech 

message: Since the units are consider gamecruft I moved them to a gaming wiki so they can be preserved.  You can now find the information here --Cs california 08:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @ 2400:AC40:709:83E:41B9:1553:C2AA:670B (talk) 23:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Units

message: :Image:Duneiib.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Duneiib.jpg

message: :Image:DuneII.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DuneII.jpg

message: A few days ago, I added the following line to chapter on AI:
* If you put a deviated unit in a repair facility, the deviated effect never wears off, so the unit stays yours.
However, now I notice this is not so much an AI bug as a bug in the game itself. If anyone knows a better place where to put this, please let me know or fix it yourself.
Van der Hoorn 03:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deviated unit in repair facility 

message: It doesn't seem unfair at all to any of you that Dune 2 pretty much pioneered RTS games as they are today and is a 15 year old game with no proper predecessor. The criticisms are so ridiculously stupid, I don't remember anyone criticising it at the time for much of the crap that's mentioned in the article at all. Anyone?
niko (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and as the section is unsourced I will remove it. ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 02:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfair Criticism 

message: The article currently reads that you could not group units.  This is untrue.  To group units, you would pick one to be the lead unit, and then tell your other units to move to the lead unit.  From that point forth, whenever the lead unit moved, the other units would follow.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.30.34.229 (talk) 07:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interface (Grouping Units) 

message: The article currently says that Dune II:
: "was the first to use the mouse to move units, allowing players to fluidly interact with their troops"
I've played The Ancient Art of War at Sea (1987, or 5 years older than Dune II, according to their respective Wikipedia articles), and it definitely allowed using the mouse to move units.
I have not read Bob Bates' "Game Developer's Market Guide", which is cited as the source for the current sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.16.40.113 (talk) 08:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First? 

message: What about Super Dune 2? Do you think this mod should find it's way into this article? I think at least there should be some mention about the mercenary faction, existent just in the game files but non-existent in the original game scenario.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.97.144.56 (talk) 23:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan Mods - Super Dune 2 and Super Dune 2 Classic 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dune II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://archive.gamespy.com/legacy/halloffame/dune2.shtm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://techland.time.com/2012/11/15/all-time-100-video-games/slide/all/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080329002219/http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=183584 to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=183584
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: @Zxcvbnm: I know we're at odds over the slightly dubious entry that is "Temujin", but Dune II was awesome eh? Iskandar323 (talk) 05:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Praise where praise is due