lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tokyo Metro Marunouchi Line

message: The right side template is too wide that it's cramping up the entire page. Apparently   tags are contributing to page widening as they're not being processed.—Tokek (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I put some line breaks  in the longest lines within the template (Ogikubo, Shinjuku, Kasumigaseki Stations) so that they're not so long. See if you like this better. Fg2 (talk) 06:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I think it looks better (viewing on an SXGA monitor). —Tokek (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, my change was undone by someone who knows the specifics of that template; the editor then fixed the template so it displays better. (I have no idea how it works.) Fg2 (talk) 21:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Too wide

message: Wouldn't Marunouchi line be the shortest name that is unambiguous?--117.120.17.227 (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marunouchi line
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Naradasupreme

message: First, I should point out I did not ask User:Naradasupreme to stop blanking; I just pointed out that this could be problematic , especially without an explanation.
I'm still not sure what the problem is here. Most likely Naradasupreme is the same as the IP user whose page s/he keeps blanking. There is still no consensus on removing warnings from talk pages, and therefore there is no "policy" against it. The possible socks also don't seem disruptive except in this very narrow area of removing warnings. In the absence of active, ongoing vandalism, I can't fault a user for removing warnings. 
I don't endorse this RfC. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 22:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate that you read it, however. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 22:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My comments
Talk:List of extreme points of Russia

message: Pevek is hardly the northernmost town.  Tiksi is at 71 38 N... I know there are towns even further north.... -Rolypolyman 22:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to our article, Tiksi is defined as a "settlement", not a "town".  I suspect that other more northerly places have not been awarded town status. Warofdreams talk 02:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is over than -1600m high.84.250.39.218 (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lake Baikal]] 

message: The westernmost and easternmost points should be anywhere along the 180th meridian in far east (and west) of Russia. It is more correct  for easternmost and westernmost points to be defined by the 180th meridian, not by the International Date Line. 83.131.14.122 (talk) 10:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *No, that's incorrect, and 83.131.14.122 is right. An "easternmost point" of any country which contains any point in the eastern hemisphere cannot possibly lie in the western hemisphere, by definition. Note this from the linked article Extreme points of Earth: "The westernmost and easternmost points of the World, based on the normal practice of using longitude, can be found anywhere along the 180th meridian in Siberian Russia [...]" --MCB (talk) 23:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

text: ** I restored the original article and added "according to the path of the International Date Line", now should be correct? Goudzovski (talk) 15:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

text: *** Was the Westernmost point of the empire not in Alaska? 89.101.188.42 (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Westernmost and easternmost points 

message: According to the article, Uelen is the easternmost settlement. I'm pretty sure there is a settlement on Big Diomede, isn't there? --RusPow (talk) 04:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there no permanent settlement on Big Diomede?
Talk:Sendagaya

message: Sendagaya (千駄ヶ谷) is an area (neighborhood, quarter) within Shibuya ward 渋谷区), one of Tokyo (東京都), Japan's (日本) special 23 wards.
Is it really necessary to write 日本 or 東京都, I think all readers know of only one Japan and one Tokyo.
128.123.242.201 (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Walking fish

message: I removed the following for lack of relevance:
*"Other notable walkers are handfish, who use their pectoral fins to walk about on the sea floor.  Their modified fins have the appearance of hands, hence their name."
*"Another animal with confusing name is flying gurnard, which does not actually fly, but can walk instead (although flying fish do exist)."
This article is supposed to be about fish that walk on land. I think 'handfish' could be a 'see also' item.
Furthermore, the alleged fact that "many" walking fish are invasive species is not supported within the article. I think the subject is interesting, but this article is in need of a re-write, starting with its organization. - IstvanWolf 23:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  article cleanup
Talk:Daimaru

message: I've redirected the one-liner about this company here. They are related, and I couldn't find sources suggesting Daimaru Matsuzakaya Department Stores is independently-notable (there are some press releases and news articles about minor scandals or events). It can be discussed here, until it growth to the length that would justify recreating 'Daimaru Matsuzakaya Department Stores' as a separate article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Daimaru Matsuzakaya Department Stores]] 
Talk:Koya Line

message: In what sense is the Shiomibashi-sen part of the Koya-sen? As it heads into Osaka to the west of the main line, while the Koya-sen goes to the southeast, it is closer to being a part of the honsen - but I wouldn't list it as part of either. Dekimasuよ! 14:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shiomibashi Line

message: The color of rapid express is the same to limited express, but it is actually similar to express rather than to limited express. For example, only LE requires additional fee unlike to Ex and RE. LE has two special names "Koya", which runs to Gokurakubashi and "Rinkan", to Hashimoto, both from Namba station.  I don't know how to change the colors in the Station section of the article. could someone edit it please? Yuryu (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I do understand what you want, but removed colours of the table. Colouring is not welcomed in ENWP. Maxima m (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Express, rapid express and limited express
Talk:It's Not Easy Being Green

message: I think he said "hair shirt and hemp knickers".
-- Ralph Corderoy 23:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strawbridge's quote

message: Someone who knows how, please improve the table to show this year's episodes, and to clearly show that they are from two series.  F W Nietzsche (talk) 12:00, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:Encyclopedia of American Biography

message: Most subjective lists are copyrighted by the publisher.  While we clearly could have an article about the encyclopedia if we wanted one, are we allowed to copy the contents in the manner that has been started here?  Does this qualify under the "fair use" exemption?  Rossami (talk) 23:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indexes are "fair use". Wjhonson 06:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:List of spaceports

message: Houston (Ellington afb) just got the go for a spaceport. --Kingkingkingkg (talk) 18:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New spaceports? 

message: Is this supposed to be a complete list? Njál 23:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Most likely it was to be and was a complete list when compiled. Just today I read that there is a new one on the Chinese island of Hainan, their fourth one. Will soon appear I guess. 101.166.68.175 (talk) 04:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete List? 

message: Should we incliude anyrting that launches something capable of reaching an altitude of X metres? Or anything that launches something capable of reaching orbit? Or escaping Earth-gravity? Should we have some criteria here? Rhialto 06:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: France should appear as green on the map. French Guiana, as an overseas department, is part of France as much as, say, Hawaii is part of the US. 
It would be nice if it said what they meant. Zazaban 18:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours on Map 

message: :Regarding the template  used on this page, please join the discussion at Template talk:Spaceport#Shorter names.
:(sdsds - talk) 23:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorter names in Spaceport template 

message: Why are the first three categories in tables and the rest just listed?  It should be consistent, and a table would make it a bit easier to read, in my opinion. --Matthew Desjardins 23:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I ran out of momentum when tabularizing them a few months ago. Feel free to finish what I started. Rhialto (talk) 10:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table? 

message: All the lists previously in this article have now been merged with the set of lists previously in Rocket launch site.  The result can be found in List of rocket launch sites.  In addition, two shorter tables have been constructed in Spaceport, one on spaceports for human launches and one on satellite launch sites. However, there is still quite a lot of remaining work to make the sets of merged lists homogeneous. /216Kleopatra (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved out 

message: The noun "gateway" is currently used in every one of the spaceports listed in the first section of the article.  Where did this come from?  I don't see any source that shows "gateway" is some sort of generic term for spaceport.  Am I missing something? N2e (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It was subsequently cleaned up.  No longer there.  N2e (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gateway?
Talk:1965 in music

message: Dear 60s and 70s music fans out there in wikiland (or is that wikispace?)
For want of an easier way of doing things, and following a question raised on another talk page, I am in the process of putting the albums released sections of the 60s and 70s in music pages into alphabetical order. 
Whilst I realise this may not be the best or most popular way of listing stuff, I reached the conclusion that other than going directly to an artist's article page, it was probably the most efficient/effective way to find that album that we want to check up on and compare it to its contemporaries. By way of example, if we were to put the following album in artist name order:
*Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5 - Jackson 5
we would [probably] have to include it twice on the same list: once under each of the named artists, whereas if we list it alphabetically there's no possible confusion(?). 
I'd appreciate some feedback on this, and in the hope that y'all agree with me (as you can imagine this is taking up quite a bit of my wikitime), I'm posting this note on all the relevant discussion pages. Please bear in mind I am only suggesting this for the albums released sections and NOT for any other kind of list. Thanx. 83.180.133.119 23:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  albums released - alphabetical order 

message: suggestion
do we have to post this?
I checked 5 in 1964 and found them all
what is reasoning? Tillywilly17 (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date unknown
Talk:Theories of New Imperialism

message: This article should be merged with Finance capitalism. Darth Sidious 23:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with Finance capitalism article

message: The links mentioning Kautsky's contributions, which preceded Hobson's book, are:
http://archive.workersliberty.org/publications/readings/2001/empire.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=hyC8AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=kautsky+marxist+imperialism+geary&source=bl&ots=vKNvaoZ_2y&sig=slzqGcZyYpiGm219D5CP92hKGu0&hl=en&ei=pWksS4TOLpSYsgPV5IHIBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CA0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=kautsky%20marxist%20imperialism%20geary&f=false (Dick Geary's bio of Kautsky)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjk2.1 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kautsky and imperialism
Talk:1962 in music

message: Dear 60s and 70s music fans out there in wikiland (or is that wikispace?)
For want of an easier way of doing things, and following a question raised on another talk page, I am in the process of putting the albums released sections of the 60s and 70s in music pages into alphabetical order. 
Whilst I realise this may not be the best or most popular way of listing stuff, I reached the conclusion that other than going directly to an artist's article page, it was probably the most efficient/effective way to find that album that we want to check up on and compare it to its contemporaries. By way of example, if we were to put the following album in artist name order:
*Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5 - Jackson 5
we would [probably] have to include it twice on the same list: once under each of the named artists, whereas if we list it alphabetically there's no possible confusion(?). 
I'd appreciate some feedback on this, and in the hope that y'all agree with me (as you can imagine this is taking up quite a bit of my wikitime), I'm posting this note on all the relevant discussion pages. Please bear in mind I am only suggesting this for the albums released sections and NOT for any other kind of list. Thanx. 83.180.133.119 23:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  albums released - alphabetical order 

message: The Beach Boys' Surfin' Safari seems to be missing from the album list. Released 1 Oct 1962 according to Wiki.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.169.241 (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surfin' Safari
Talk:1961 in music

message: Dear 60s and 70s music fans out there in wikiland (or is that wikispace?)
For want of an easier way of doing things, and following a question raised on another talk page, I am in the process of putting the albums released sections of the 60s and 70s in music pages into alphabetical order. 
Whilst I realise this may not be the best or most popular way of listing stuff, I reached the conclusion that other than going directly to an artist's article page, it was probably the most efficient/effective way to find that album that we want to check up on and compare it to its contemporaries. By way of example, if we were to put the following album in artist name order:
*Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5 - Jackson 5
we would [probably] have to include it twice on the same list: once under each of the named artists, whereas if we list it alphabetically there's no possible confusion(?). 
I'd appreciate some feedback on this, and in the hope that y'all agree with me (as you can imagine this is taking up quite a bit of my wikitime), I'm posting this note on all the relevant discussion pages. Please bear in mind I am only suggesting this for the albums released sections and NOT for any other kind of list. Thanx. 83.180.133.119 23:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  albums released - alphabetical order
Talk:Paint mine

message: This article's subject matter is too small to warrant its own article. I suggest merge it into Paintball equipment and create its own article later, if it grows to an appropriate size. ~ Maximilli, 23:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. I'll do it next time I have a few mins, unless someone wants to beat me to it. ~ Maximilli, 23:13, 15:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Former Hokkaidō Government Office

message: This needs a better title. For one thing, I'm sure there are many former government office buildings. This one just happens to be architecturally interesting and well-known. Is Akarenga viable? Should it just be located at the (long) official Japanese name? Dekimasu 15:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. 'Building' is redundant anyway. I will change this. --Kleinzach 02:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Sony Building (Tokyo)

message: Adding website history as ref, as well as location. Adding architect's site as a ref. Adding info about 1992 renovation. Removing statement that the original mural is still present. The facade was replaced in 1992, so unless this refers to something else, it is not true.
This was one of my favorite buildings in the Ginza when it was first opened. The lobby had a bamboo pipe organ (bamboo pipes instead of the big wood pipes). When I went downtown, I would try to get to the Ginza at times when they did their organ "recitals". Then I could head upstairs to the isolated listening room -- a quiet island in the midst of a noisy city. If anyone can find any information on this organ, it would make a great addition to the article. It was gone by the time I went back to Japan in 1976. Don Lammers (talk) 23:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding refs

message: What is the street address? ----Cowlinator (talk) 01:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the street address?
Talk:1971 in music

message: Dear 60s and 70s music fans out there in wikiland (or is that wikispace?)
For want of an easier way of doing things, and following a question raised on another talk page, I am in the process of putting the albums released sections of the 60s and 70s in music pages into alphabetical order. 
Whilst I realise this may not be the best or most popular way of listing stuff, I reached the conclusion that other than going directly to an artist's article page, it was probably the most efficient/effective way to find that album that we want to check up on and compare it to its contemporaries. By way of example, if we were to put the following album in artist name order:
*Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5 - Jackson 5
we would [probably] have to include it twice on the same list: once under each of the named artists, whereas if we list it alphabetically there's no possible confusion(?). 
I'd appreciate some feedback on this, and in the hope that y'all agree with me (as you can imagine this is taking up quite a bit of my wikitime), I'm posting this note on all the relevant discussion pages. Please bear in mind I am only suggesting this for the albums released sections and NOT for any other kind of list. Thanx. 83.180.133.119 23:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  albums released - alphabetical order 

message: It appears to me that every reference that I find for "Drowning In The Sea Of Love" by Joe Simon gives the release date as 1972, except for Wikipedia, which lists it as one of the "Biggest hit singles" of 1971. Unless someone can find documentation otherwise, I believe that this song was released in 1972, and was one of the biggest hit singles of 1972. Any comments from anyone? Yanq (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Drowning In The Sea Of Love" by Joe Simon
Talk:Succession to the Bhutanese throne

message: While the source states "male primogeniture", it appears more likely to me that it is indeed Salic law instead, as the list in the article seems to indicate... —Nightstallion (?) 23:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Samuel Hiestand

message: I submit that being only the ninth Bishop of the Church of the United Brethren in Christ makes clear the notability and historical importance of Samuel Heistand.  As more details about his life are added to this article, this notability and importance will become even more clear.  Pastorwayne 18:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed; the earlier problem was that the article understated the achievements and eminence of SH.  -- roundhouse 20:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Inokashira Park

message: I was curious as to the description of Benzaiten in this article.  In this article, it states that Benzaiten is "a vengeful goddess of love".  However, the article for the goddess, Benzaiten, on wikipedia states that "Her Sanskrit name is "Sarasvatî Devî", which means "flowing water", and so Benzaiten is the goddess of everything that flows: water, words (and knowledge, by extension), speech, eloquence, and music."
I believe, from what I've been taught from my parents, that the latter description is true.  I was lead to believe that Benzaiten is the goddess of knowledge, beauty, art (especially music).  However, because she is female, she is prone to jealously, and therefore it is forbidden for couples to visit temples that are dedicated to her, or the relationship is doomed. Shu ster (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: (untitled)

message: Blogger Ulara Nakagawa wrote this report about a female elephant received from Thailand as a gift to the Japanese people in 1949. The elephant, Hanako, has been kept on display at the zoo, alone in a concrete enclosure. The report, describing her health, behavioral, and possibly additional problems related to her immediate environment, has sparked action by people concerned for animal welfare. They aim to prompt the zoo to provide Hanako with more comfortable and stimulating surroundings. -- Deborahjay (talk) 13:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The elephant Hanako in the Inokashira Park zoo
Talk:November 2001 Atlantic Canada storm complex

message: Very good for such a difficult storm! CrazyC83 01:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) Hurricanehink (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Overall this is a very well-written article. It is also very well cited, although my only qualm with the article is that the lead section is not sourced. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 04:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA nomination passes

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:Born on the Wrong Planet

message: I doubt that Michael Kang really plays the violone (a baroque bass viol), the article about him doesn't tell anything like that. I guess it is a mistranslation from the French violon, which simply means the violin. Can anybody check the original album credits? --FordPrefect42 (talk) 11:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Violone]]?