Talk:Nick Jr. (British and Irish TV channel)

message: :Image:Nickjr logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nickjr logo.jpg

message: Nick Jr. UK
86.44.202.58 (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense request - nothing to do. Bonusballs (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 23 September 2012 

message: Nick Jr. uk
86.41.32.210 (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Continued nonsense from this IP address range. Not done. Bonusballs (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 4 October 2012 

message: Do you think someone should protect this article? TDFan2006 (talk) 12:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: An edit has blanked and re-directed this page 3 time in the last week. So does it have enough notability in its own right? Murry1975 (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd suggest that it clearly does. If you check Finealt's edit history you can see he has blanked and deleted material from hundreds of kids'  tv articles in a very short space of time. There's no reason why this channel is any less notable than any other channel in this country or anywhere else. If there are problems with the content of the article then by all means discuss them, but deleting the article by the back door - i.e. replacing it with a redirect - so as to avoid a proper deletion discussion is clearly an abuse of process.  Bonusballs (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-direct 

message: It has been unsourced for years, but I believe information backing the section up is available in WebArchive. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we get rid of the History section? 

message: The file :File:Old Nick Jr logo.png is being considered for deletion for as a violation of WP:NFCCP #8: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."]]
Discussion of this deletion proposal can be found on the talk page of image itself. — trlkly 20:18, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use dispute over image Old Nick Jr logo.png 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:MTV (British and Irish TV channel) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 12:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress