Talk:Orange, New South Wales

message: Nice to see a clear and consise article about an Australian town. I wonder how long it will be until local business and busybodies add their rubbish and turn it into an embarrassing ramble. Oh dear, I seem to be the first............ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.13.206 (talk) 13:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Meteorological data from Orange Post Office have not been collected since 1968, so I have reverted to the previous version of the article. But is there more up-to-date data than the data from Orange PO that is more representative than the airport data? Ondewelle (talk) 11:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Climate

message: I am going to change the population as it is wrong orange has 57 544 people not 31 544 people get itright also orange is not a town it is a large city if you are not from orange please don't comment on this page thankyou  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.32.140 (talk) 07:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed it back. The population given in the article is supported by a reliable source. Your version is not. Please do not change it again. -- Mattinbgn\talk 07:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The population of Orange is not 57,544 people, however the population in this article is wrong. The correct population of Orange is 38,000 as the official website says here: http://www.orange-nsw.com/History.html. I'm not sure if you've been to Orange, but even as you enter the city there is a sign with the population of Orange listed as 38,000. Since there is a reliable source (the official website) we should change the population to 38,000. Cityscape4 (talk) 8:07, 12 March 2011
Recent abs statistics on estimated populations are published here http://profile.id.com.au/Default.aspx?id=262&pg=210 - I altered the article because I would argue that 2006 census statistics whilst accurate are grossly out of date, and an interim set of statistics from the abs are more appropriate in the article (at least until the next census).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.189.158 (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

text: .id consulting have been contracted by the Council to prepare those figures and thus they are not an independent source. Census figures are independent and consistent. Unless there has been massive demographic change, which there has not been in Orange, they are not grossly out of date and are more than suitable for use here. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: .id are using ABS statistics. The site also states 'However the Census count is not the official population of an area. To provide a more accurate population figure which is updated more frequently than every 5 years, the Australian Bureau of Statistics also produces "Estimated Resident Population" (ERP) numbers.' These ABS statistics can be located here http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3218.02008-09, they record 38,685. The availability of such information should be considered preferential to any outdated information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.189.158 (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Just to add to this, 38,685 is accepted here as well http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Australia_by_population  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.189.158 (talk) 09:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is LGA population not Urban population. the 38,000 figure belongs in the City of Orange article not this one. 124.183.163.127 (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair cop, I see my mistake now. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.189.158 (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://genealogy.wikicities.com/wiki/John_Blackman_(1795-1867)
*:Triggered by \bwikicities\.com\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the not-at-all-useful external link with a more useful reference. James Blackman (not John Blackman as he was being called) probably deserves a WP article; he's mentioned in a number of articles in relation to that part of NSW and he has a biography on the Australian Dictionary of Biography, so I redlinked him in anticipation.Kerry (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: There were two sections headed "climate", with different (though not conflicting) text and a weather box from different meteorological stations. I have attempted to combine the text and included both weather boxes in the one section. The second weather box, with the less complete data, might be better as collapsible/expandable. Ondewelle (talk) 14:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicated "climate" section

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Orange, New South Wales's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "census":
From Australian Capital Territory: 
From Mackay, Queensland: 
From Cowra: 
From Lismore, New South Wales: 
From Victor Harbor, South Australia: 
From Tamworth, New South Wales: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Orange, New South Wales]]