Talk:Beauty and the Beast

message: Is there any reference that clear states or refers The Pig King is a variant or adaption of Beauty and the Beast? Or I will move it into "See also" section. --TX55<SUP>TALK</SUP> 18:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pig King 

message: Does anyone know why the title would be "Beauty and the Beast" rather than "The Beauty and the Beast"?  The original French has the definite article, and dropping it in English would seem to defy grammatical convention. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 00:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no definite article in "Beauty"? 

message: The only thing found to the support the Super Mario universe idea is this theory.
[]
The story also certainly draws from the Hades and Persephone myth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.203.140.218 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Cupid and Psyche some similarities (but not really the same lessons at all) but Persephone ? That's more than far-fetched. Do you even know the story of Persephone ? 116.231.73.114 (talk) 06:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern uses and adaptations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beauty and the Beast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140726163822/http://www.endicott-studio.com/articleslist/beauty-and-the-beast-old-and-new-by-terri-windling.html to http://www.endicott-studio.com/articleslist/beauty-and-the-beast-old-and-new-by-terri-windling.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I wasn't sure of the best way to edit this, so maybe someone with more experience can help. But I accidentally clicked on the original link for reference 1 instead of the archive, and the original link now sends you to a page with a pornographic image at the top. Is there a good way to remove the original link?
:Fixed. Thanks for catching this. MarnetteD|Talk 18:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pornographic Link 

message: "like in Beaumont's version, it is not mentioned that the protagonist's sisters are punished at the end. " Nothing in the section on Beaumont mentions any punishment. 84.71.45.82 (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe, France section 

message: Hello
The Villeneuve's plot section is false, perhaps a movie adaptation plot, or Vandalism. Last good Villeneuve's plot is 14 July 2020‎ , heavily altered by User:Harry Vallet : [see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beauty_and_the_Beast&type=revision&diff=970115033&oldid=967697656 ].
You can read real Villeneuve plot at de.wiki or it.wiki 
Regards --2A02:8428:EAC:DC01:206B:E500:6BBA:4237 (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Villeneuve plot