Talk:Harry V. Jaffa

message: POV of somewhat cranky conservative critic of Jaffa.  What is needed instead is a competent summary of Jaffa's work, with attention to his disputes with the leading lights of the American historical profession, and a paragraph (at most) on his disputes with fellow conservatives.  The web links are a bad joke.
:I see in the current version a paragraph on disputes with other scholars and a paragraph about disputes with conservatives. Also, what makes the weblinks a bad joke? Thanks, -Willmcw 21:09, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
::I concur. There are paragraphs on some of Jaffa's disputes, but I don't see anything that's a POV violation. Since the poster who placed this here has not returned or specified any changes he thinks are needed, the tag should be removed shortly. Rangerdude 02:30, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: reference to birthdate
::and how about some material on his personal background, where was he born and where did he grow up etc.?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.172.225 (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm actually looking for that type of information, but have not come across it yet. Scholar999 (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate

message: This article is in need of a facelift.  I'm thinking about completely reorganizing the intro, excluding everything but the most basic information.  For example, Jaffa's work with Barry Goldwater could be a new section, and his connection to West Coast Straussians should be too.  As far as the text, we need a comprehensive list of his works, essays, and any speeches, like the Goldwater one, to include.  We also need to highlight his work on Abraham Lincoln (Crisis of the House Divided, and A New Birth of Freedom) along with the debates he's had with Thomas DiLorenzo (Von Mises follower?) and the others already listed in the article.  PLEASE give me some feedback!
JeanValJean redux (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey JeanValJean, well I am happy to have stumbled upon this page. After having read some of his books, I definitely agree that the page in its current format is a bit inadequate, so a facelift would be much appreciated. It seems like a daunting task though. I think what we could use a scholarship section (or perhaps multiple to highlight the different topics he highlights), his participation in politics (working with Goldwater being an example), a section on debates he has had, and last, but not least, a background section would be a bit helpful as well. Scholar999 (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp 

message: I'm compiling a list of his writings.  There are some listed on claremont.org and amazon.com.  Any help compiling that list would be appreciated.  Tommyboy1215 (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm slowly getting a list together as well. I figure I'll start posting his works in its own section for now, but it will likely be incomplete considering his vast body of work and my lack of time. Scholar999 (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I noticed that some of his writings have been moved.  The current link to the Intelligent Design one is here: www.claremont.org/basicPageArticles/jaffa-on-intelligent-design/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.148.235.6 (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of publications 

message: This book appears to have the best summary of Jaffa's work along with his disputes with other scholars. JeanValJean redux (talk) 14:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Truth About Leo Strauss" 

message: In this section, Jaffa's "most noted book" is mentioned, but is not really expanded upon. Considering the fact that is his most noted book, should we consider placing a few of the most prominent points briefly within this section?Scholar999 (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lincoln Studied" Section 

message: I am really liking the layout of the page, I went ahead and moved some of the information that did not fit in the "Jaffa-DiLorenzo Debate" would to the "Lincoln debated" section. I only moved the information that does not deal with that debate itself. Scholar999 (talk) 01:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaffa-DiLorenzo Debate 

message: If the details of the debates are going to be presented, then the counter points should be presented. Otherwise the section is simply a soapbox for Jaffa's views.  – S. Rich (talk) 18:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debates -- Balance 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Harry V. Jaffa. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/16/henry-jaffa-lincoln-douglas-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson_print.html
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.aei.org/article/politics-and-public-opinion/whats-wrong-with-conservatism-speech/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Harry V. Jaffa. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/396163/harry-jaffa-rip-yuval-levin
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Harry V. Jaffa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110808051435/http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1130/article_detail.asp to http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1130/article_detail.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Harry V. Jaffa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110808082333/http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.484/pub_detail.asp to http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.484/pub_detail.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Jaffa courted controversy, particularly on gay issues, at least according to The Nation. No mention in the article...? Cleopatran Apocalypse (talk) 19:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No controversies 

message: Although Jaffa is deceased, large portions of the article are written in present tense.
Island Pelican (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Past Tense

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion