lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Front National

message: Sorry, Mintguy, but they generally deny being extreme-right. They even sued newspapers for using the term.
He deny everything he sued everyone he says is not fascist not nazi not anti-semistic not extreme right wing not xenophobic.
He says he his "socialement de gauche, économiquement de droite, nationalement Français" sounds like "National Socialist" aka Nazi  no ? Ericd 00:09 Sep 8, 2002 (UTC)
----
Is "Front National" in English or French?  If it is in English, it's a bad translation and should be "National Front".  If it's in French, it should be in italics so the reader knows it's not in English. DanKeshet
It's French.  Proper names are not usually translated I think, and there's not
much point in adding (English: National Front).  Cf. Christen Democratisch Appèl
:Yeah, the translation is obvious, but I'm going to put the phrase in italics because "front" and "national" are both perfectly normal English words, so it's not obvious that the phrase itslef is not in poor English.  DanKeshet
----
Ah, that's a very balanced article indeed !!!
----
Apparently this page is a disambiguation page, I have found that another page exists called National Front which lists different parties with that name:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Front
Which one do you want to delete? The other article has interlanguage links to various wikipedias so it might be wiser to keep it.
--Clementminaudier (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Château de Loches

message: This is the only photo I have. If someone has a better one please substitute. Thanks....DW — Preceding unsigned comment added by  DW  (talk • contribs)  01:49, 8 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Removed section on WW2 since clearly applies to the Château de Chenonceaux - both the keep and the Chateau at Loches are nowhere near the river.  Reprinted below for completeness. - SW — Preceding unsigned comment added by  81.79.236.30  (talk • contribs)  19:23, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section
Talk:Tina Turner

message: If you ask me, I think Tina’s page needs to be locked just like everyone else’s. There’s no special treatment. 2601:346:4300:55B0:5964:3171:3440:748D (talk) 01:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. 2601:346:4300:55B0:7188:34B4:F4A3:B37F (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there is some vandalisim or sockpuppetry going on, pages are not locked. If you think you have a good reason, you may request protection at WP:RFPP. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 00:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tina’s Page Needs to be Locked 

message: I read a source that says that she did not attend her mother’s funeral because Ike was there, however her mother was cremated, and her ashes were scattered at sea, however find a grave is not reliable although it says she was buried. Source here:  Zelma’s biography on Family Search also mentioned her being buried.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk • contribs) 22:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother 

message: Her older half sister’s name may be Evelyn Juanita Lovelace, not Currie. Her father’s name is Percy Lovelace and according to her death certificate her real name is Lovelace. Turner's sister and cousins were killed in 1954. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, It was Vela Evans that survived the car crash. Margaret and Evelyn died. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 10:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister and cousins killed
Talk:Lord

message: Hi 94.198.176.217 (talk) 20:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Lord and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 6#The Lord until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Iskandar323 (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Lord" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Handicraft

message: The historical information contained in this article is limited to just one culture and geographical base.  Since handicrafts exist in almost all cultures and places, this section needs to be expanded to include far more cultures.  Also, to my mind what distinguishes an item or activity as handicraft is that it is intended for use within the home of the person who made it, rather than for sale or distribution. --Redcore4 (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's one solution; the other would be to develop the article to cover more areas. They're not mutually incompatible models, either; see WP:SUMMARY. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ  Contrib.  02:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrow, India-specific history section 

message: I added sources, as requested. Article still needs more. Kim9988 (talk) 18:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Is there any subject in common schools teaching handicrafts? Asking for the better interwikis on the topic.  GreenStork (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lessons on handicraft 

message: file::c:File:Handmade frame work.jpg Reason:Missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content. subpage:link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons 

message: Hello all,
I am editing DIY Ethic and I noticed that some of the information may be better suited on this page than the other. Here is the link to the sandbox with the information that I plan on removing from the original article. I think it has great potential to be used and don't want it to be lost. Lostxxjustina (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch! Since you're already working on it and you have a better understanding of what's getting removed from that article, perhaps you could be the one to add that content to this article? Ibadibam (talk) 04:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential New Information 

message: A hi is a bye 103.121.219.35 (talk) 10:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: Male 175.176.70.5 (talk) 01:54, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurement of Handicraft 

message: Handcrafted 49.205.229.67 (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social
Talk:Vinyl record

message: Shouldn't this page just be made a redirect to Gramophone record? (172.192.243.63)
: I agree. It should forward to gramophone record...the only difference is a gramophone record might not be made out of vinyl. :p I see no reason to provide them with a lesser page if a better one exists. They'll think this is it. - Brandon.irwin 00:32, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am bringing this suggestion up at Talk:Gramophone record; let's discuss it there. -- Infrogmation 20:33, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this page just be made a redirect 

message: I'm going to go ahead and do this. Contact me if you have problems; otherwise I'm compiling everything onto disc record and making 'gramophone record' and 'vinyl record' into redirects. I have chosen this over the other two names because 1 - not all records were vinyl, and 2 - both phonograph and gramophone are used for the same machine, which is confusing. Better just to make a wholley separate page, I think. -Litefantastic 00:41, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But "disc record" is a neologism that more people will be unfamiliar with. Not only that but the term on its own merits would also apply to a CD.  Better to use "gramophone record" as the main title.  And don't forget to put in the redirect from "phonograph record".  The first is British and the second is American. Or use "phonograph record" as the main article simply because the US population is 5X the British population so phonograph would theoretically reduce the server redirect activity.  --Blainster 06:02, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

text: No! Not that I think "disc record" is a bad title off hand, but having the main article at gramophone record was the result of CONSIDERABLE discussion and a vote where it was decided that "gramophone record" was all and all the least objectionable of the possible titles. Please see Talk:gramophone record before deciding to rehash this issue unilaterally. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 12:55, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litefantastic likes the title "Disc record" 
Talk:Hausdorff maximal principle

message: Why an equivalent form of the theorem is that in every partially ordered set there exists a maximal totally ordered subset is not obvious? Just start with a one element set, and extend it. Albmont 21:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After you get to infinity, then what? What if, as in general topology, your partially ordered set contains an uncountable infinity of elements? linas 01:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Obvious

message: In the article a formulation of the Hausdorff maximality principle is given, followed by an equivalent statement of it. What follows is a formal statement. To my surprise, this is a formal statement of the equivalent form of the principle. I myself find this a bit weird. Wouldn't it be better if the formal statement would correspond to the first statement of the principle?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HSNie (talk • contribs) 19:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reformulated it. However, I am unconvinced of the usefulness of the whole section. It's not as if the statement there is any more formal that the short one given in the lead, it's only slightly more explicit by expanding some of the definitions. — Emil J. 13:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Neither am I. It isn't a formal formulation at all. I just added the prove that the equivalent form is equivalent in a form that isn't complete yet. If someone feels like completing the details I just omitted, it'd be great. Hope you agree with adding it.HSNie 23:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of the article 

message: The statement in the first sentence that Hausdorff "proved" it in 1914 needs clarification: he can't really have proved the statement in an absolute sense as it doesn't follow from ZFC. I guess it means he proved it to be a consequence of the axiom of choice, or to be equivalent to the axiom of choice?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.0.182 (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Proof"? 

message: The two examples on this page are copied verbatim from Munkres, Chapter 1, Section 11.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.167.131 (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples from Munkres 

message: The Planetmath reference template seems to be broken. Here are the direct links.
* Hausdorff's maximum principle
* A proof of equivalence of Zorn's lemma, the well-ordering theorem, and Hausdorff's maximum principle
-- Lilalas (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Planetmath
Talk:Rock band

message: Following a move request (Talk:Rock Band (video game)#Requested move), the article about the video game Rock Band was moved to Rock Band (video game), with support in the discussion for redirecting all capitalizations of "Rock Band" to the video game. This was apparently done without checking the incoming links, where just over 2300 articles link to Rock band, mostly from articles about rock bands. Very few of the incoming links refer to the video game, so I've redirected the page back to Rock music, until either the links are fixed, or some other solution is determined. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where to redirect?

message: this should not be a redirect, it should be a disamb.
Rock band can refer to:
*Rock Band (video game)
*A band that performs Rock music
Kingturtle (talk) 14:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ^^agreed^^  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.34.246.7 (talk) 14:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the community discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 February 25 if you wish to comment on this. Thanks. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 17:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disamb
Talk:List of rock and roll artists

message: Redundancy with Rock band? - User:Olivier
Is the title OK ?
Is this Rock & Roll or simply Rock ?
Is this performers or singer/artists/bands ?
Ericd 11:43, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. List of popular music performers is the right place for those. I'll get on weeding out this list as well as I can and leave the ones I'm unfamiliar with. -- Djinn112 00:45, Mar 13, 2004 (UTC)
I translated Sexy Sadie from the Spanish Wikipedia.  It's currently an orphan and I'm trying to figure out where I should list them.  They're a pop rock band from Majorca.  Anybody got an opinion where they should go? Isomorphic 16:21, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsorted text

message: I had not seen this article before. It's been here for over 15 years and not one reference?! That stops now. Any added without a source will be reverted -- per pages such as WP:LISTPEOPLE. Musdan77 (talk) 19:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I will start getting on top of references for each performer after I tidy up the list itself. Pojo54 (talk) 16:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references 

message: The criteria for the performers included on this list need to be more clearly defined.  Rock itself is more of a central genre that branches out into many sub-genres or fuses well with other central genres like country, jazz, blues, etc.  I think a good guide to keeping this list true and orderly is by simply following the sub-genres and fusions that are included on the rock music page itself.  This is where I'd like some feedback as there may be debate towards genres like metal, punk, or new wave, which are indeed rock but have more or less evolved into categories of their own.  Personally, I think this rock list should be that massive blanketing index that encompasses all sub-genres within it, including those mentioned before.  I would even make the argument that funk groups like Funkadelic, Earth, Wind & Fire, or Sly & the Family Stone have a place as funk can be seen a the bridge between rock and R&B. However, I wouldn't object if the popular opinion opposed this view. Pojo54 (talk) 16:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performer Criteria 

message: Rockncanadafalls (aka banned user MariaJaydHicky) completly changed this list back in September 2015 by adding numerous rock artists to the list. The list was then incorrectly renamed "List of rock music performers" by Musdan77 in 2019. As the list is now a mess without any clear criteria, I'm therefore restoring a 2015 version of this list, when it was still known under the title "List of rock and roll performers", with rock and roll musicians. I'm also adding reliable sources explicitly calling all of them "rock and roll", and not just "rock". Synthwave.94 (talk) 23:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, not "incorrectly renamed" at the time, as my reason was correct: "more accurate". And obviously, I gave up on keeping this article clean a long time ago. Musdan77 (talk) 02:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back to a cleaner version
Talk:Analemma

message: Isn't there also a lunar analemma?  If so, why isn't it mentioned in the text of the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically yes, but it changes every month and is pretty much never used that I am aware of.  --Lasunncty (talk) 07:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lunar analemma

message: The "fat" side of the the actual analemma happens in November when the sun is heading south. The image presented here shows the "fat" side with the sun moving north. This image should not be on the page for the analemma. Any image on this page should show that the "fat" side of the analemma happens when the sun is moving south, roughly from July through November. Steven L Allen (talk) 23:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the issue is that the straight line drawn is not the meridian, but instead connects the two solstices and the crossover point.  Without this line it would be fine.  --Lasunncty (talk) 10:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The line from one solstice to another does not pass through the crossover point, so even that is misleading. The straight line must be removed to avoid severe confusion, but even so it is unclear why this image is deemed to be useful by comparison to the actual photos which have been taken of the analemma starting with Dennis di Cicco in 1978/1979. Steven L Allen (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would support either removing the image or replacing it with another one.  It contributes no information that is not already elsewhere in the article. -- Lasunncty (talk) 22:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The calculated analemma image from Germany is rendered backwards.
Talk:Louis Aragon

message: Which French region did he adopt as a pseudonym? - User:Olivier
: Spanish region of Aragon, where his father was ambassadeur. He did not adopt a pseudonym. He was officialy declared as "born from unknowed father" and his mother declared "to give birth under X", it mean whithout recognize, she assume the role of a legal mother. In such case in France, a fantasy name is choised by the mother or the man (father of the child or not) who make the declaration, meanwhile a adoption. Louis Andrieux made the declaration whitout saying he was the father but he said the father was unknowed and in the sametime the mother adopted the child. As she was'nt married, she could'nt give his name. A so complicated procedure was not so difficult for a high civil servant. The name Aragon is not a pseudonym. Louis Aragon is not "born Louis Andrieux" as said in the article. If he had child, these would be named Aragon. N.b. "build castels in Spain" mean "make adventurous project".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.171.84.83 (talk) 00:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Therefore, it is best to simply drop born… --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pseudonym

message: Aragon is a great poet and I think it would be fair to say more about his poetry than his personal life. -Mara
:there was a bit on the french wiki page but i didn't think it was that good, so i leave someone to create it new. Poppi12 19:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poetry

message: Lilya Brik, the sister of Elsa Triolet was not an official wife of Mayakovsky, therefore it is not correct to call Elsa "sister-in-law". 71.243.104.123 05:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Elsa Triolet-Mayakovsky

message: I've moved this here for discussion:
The central message of Manouchian's letter is clear: He is willing to forgive even the Germans, but not the Communist Party bosses who sold him and his comrades down the river (ceux qui nous ont vendus). In his poem, Aragon, following the French Communist Party line (adding only a few factual errors of his own), managed somehow to overlook Manouchian's message. Bosco (Bosco Boucault): Des terroristes à la retraite, (Terrorists in Retirement), 1983Debate preceding and following Mosco's documentary on the French TV channel Antenne 2 (1985)
The reason is simple: to say "the central message of Manouchian's letter is clear" without providing a full quote of the letter does not comply with WP:Verifiability. Furthermore, the allusion that Aragon would have added a few factual errors and followed the Communist Party's line is not given attribution. All of this may be very correct, but since it's sensitive matter full quotes should be provided. Tazmaniacs 15:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Poster poem 

message: I think it would be only respectful to Aragon if we were to allow vandalism on this page.  Any objections?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.230.144.239 (talk) 16:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What a knee-slapper! Guccisamsclub (talk) 21:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism
Talk:Orchestra

message: "In the Baroque era, the size and composition of an orchestra was not standardised. There were large differences in size, instrumentation and playing styles—and therefore in orchestral soundscapes and palettes — between the various European regions. The Baroque orchestra ranged from smaller orchestras (or ensembles) with one player per part, to larger scale orchestras with many players per part. Examples of the smaller variety were Bach's orchestras, for example in Koethen, where he had access to an ensemble of up to 18 players. Examples of large scale Baroque orchestras would include Corelli's orchestra in Rome which ranged between 35 and 80 players for day-to-day performances, being enlarged to 150 players for special occasions"
Problems:
* Reading this passage, one might imply that baroque orchestras ranged in size from about 18 to 150. That's absurd. 3 to 60 would be more accurate.
* A key point about the baroque orchestra is that music was rarely written specifically for a large group and there just was no clear divide between chamber music and orchestral music. Many works could be performed by 3 players (2 violins, bass) including Corelli's concerti grossi. Venetian polychoral style was influential and concerti could be played with ripieno or capella or without expanded forces. "non-grosso" Concerti for soloists and strings were frequently performed by groups of 6...10...13 people in courtly chamber settings. Massive orchestras were rare occurences throughout Europe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:598:92B7:E5A0:9023:1B3B:4707:E4A0 (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baroque orchestra