lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nappa (Dragon Ball)

message: Nappa is a tertiary character. Lots of secondary and tertiary characters have already nonsensically been merged, so there's no logical reason that this even lesser character who appears in 11 episodes total and has one movie appearance to have his own page.
:11 episodes? Are you taking into consideration the uncut episodes? Also, each episode is around 20 minutes, plus the 45 minute movie, puts him at least 4.5 hours of film. Lets not forget his manga appearances, and also that it's still read by millions of fans in dozens of countries. Oh yeah, his multiple appearances in the video game series, and face on merchandise, I bet fans want to learn more about him, and what better way to do that then read an article on him, instead of a couple sentences in a long list of "less-important" characters. I think he's pretty important. I say no to the merge because there are already tons of tertiary characters in the list, and he is way more important then most of them, giving himself his own article. Hucz 10:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance - Merging 

message: If Nappa were to become SS would his moustache become gold? Or would he just have an aura? Just wonderin'.--suit-n-tie 10:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, an age old question. Similar to what if Radditz went Super Saiyan 3? :P The answer is, no one really knows. Tsukento 01:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Saiyan Nappa 

message: how strong is nappa compared to other saiyan elites he says he was the Lieutenant of the saiyan army but bardock was recorded to have a high power level than nappa. User:Kami-Sama
:Uh, says who? Burdock wasn't even mentioned until he appeared in the TV special. And even then, Bardock wasn't even a part of the Elite Saiyans. Burdock was part of the Lower Class Saiyans that destroyed the relatively weak planets. Tsukento 01:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  nappa the elite 

message: is nappa actually bald because in the bardock speacial he is seen with hair and vegeta said a saiyans hair never changes from birth
:Possibly a flub on Toei's part as they have a terrible time being consistant with things Toriyama writes into the manga. Another hair example would be Vegeta changing his hairstyle in GT. Tsukento 01:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember GT is NOT canon. In DB continuity, Vegeta never cut his hair.--suit-n-tie 22:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dose nappa cut his hair ? 

message: A couple of logged-out editors have reverted to undo this merge in the past couple of weeks. I'm not totally against that but I'd prefer to see the merits discussed. I've reverted to the merged version for now. --Tony Sidaway 11:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Undoing merge?
Talk:Rob Thomas (writer)

message: The redirect Rob Thomas(writer) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Rob Thomas(writer)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dum Dum Dugan

message: I assume that he is nicknamed after the ammunition (not because he's an idiot) but I have no proof of this. Does anyone know for sure? --GentlemanGhost 07:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: I think this article has enough information not to be a stub anymore. I realize the article is not that long, but he really is just a supporting cast member for the bigger character of Nick Fury, there's not a lot to report. Bradtcordeiro 01:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Status 

message: How about a section for alternate versions, aside from Ultimate? There's the out of continuity 'Fury' series, where Dugan retires, marries a girl and goes to AA. Then the Mutant X one where he is a horrific, mutant-killing racist, as is most of SHIELD.
Lots42 05:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Versions?  

message: What age is he supposed to be?   He was active with Nick Fury during World War II and active in the present.  Nick Fury's vitality has been explained by the Infinity Formula.  However, Dugan has not been given any explanation why he continues to not have aged appreciably since the end of World War II and remains as physically active and vital as he was during the early to mid-1940s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.79.214.150 (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Sumitomo Group

message: Dainippon Sumitomo Seiyaku Gaisha (大日本住友製薬会社） isn't listed on this page, although I am unsure whether it is a subsidiary of Sumitomo Chemical Corporation or not.  It certainly appears to operate as a separate entity rather than a branch or division of the Chemical corporation (which I've never heard of).
shinmaywa  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.177.54.54 (talk) 11:14, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

message: Our article is titled "Sumitomo Group", while the lede opens with "Sumitomo Clan". The latter appears to be the historical family name of the founder. The company's English website  calls it the "Sumitomo Group", so I'm thinking that should be the opening of the lede also. --Pete Tillman (talk) 23:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group or Clan? 

message: Sumitomo Forestry America has just acquired Crescent Communities of Charlotte, NC, which owns multiple real estate holdings in Charlotte as well as newly acquired sections of other states such as Arizona (Phoenix) and middle Tennessee (source below). They have also acquired a large new expansion project in west Charlotte along the Catawba River called River District--not yet built--which is projected to be larger than any current Charlotte area of development (even the largest area called Ballantyne). The Sumitomo Forestry America Corporation is retaining the current name of the company, 'CRESCENT COMMUNITIES' so the acquisition will not accurately reflect the addition to the SUMITOMO GROUP you have listed in Wikipedia currently as the American name is retained. How many other corporations have they purchased already, listed under other names?    LisaRudisill (talk) 13:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUMITOMO FORESTRY AMERICA
Talk:Frisco RoughRiders

message: This is my first step into the world of Wikipedia, so far I'm liking what I'm seeing.  Anyway, I didn't have time to finish out this article (2005 season and beyond, stadium info & citations), so I will try to finish that later, or perhaps someone new can take over.  I am positive there are numerous gramatical and spelling errors in this article as well, I apologize for not having enough time to check that either.  Is this the right direction this article should be headed in?--Kevin 07:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editting

message: I went ahead and added this to wikiproject baseball.  Should help out this site.--Kevin 18:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Baseball
Talk:Williamston, Michigan

message: I have started and will continue to update this article in hopes of improvement.  It seems like throughout its history people have added various facts and information, and although a lot of it is good data, the article no longer has a real flow.  Also, as has been stated, it needs a neutral POV. --Desheffer 07:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:British people of South Asian descent

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#British_.22ethnic.22_categories_again
I disagree strongly with this effort that's being made to wipe out a valid category. If you have opinions on the matter, please make your voice heard. --Peripatetic 07:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Farrow Maxwell

message: Going by his stated birth year of 1900, Maxwell is currently 107 years young. Is that correct? If so, the article should make mention of the fact that he's a centenarian. - IstvanWolf 17:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He died in 1985. Reference has been provided and it is also confirmed in the SSDI. Cheers, CP 17:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he still alive? 

message: *I was able to find coverage here (Philly Inquirer obit), here (detailed Counrier-Journal article), here (NYT obit), and here (detailed NYT article) on Maxwell. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources
Talk:Marine Society & Sea Cadets

message: I propose that Marine Society and Sea Cadets be merged into Marine Society & Sea Cadets. I think that the content in the Marine Society and Sea Cadets article is an unnecessary duplicate, and that this should be the preferred article name, as the use of "&" in the organisation's name is preferred in brand guidelines. The Marine Society & Sea Cadets article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Marine Society and Sea Cadets will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. ReductiveSet72 (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Whose Body?

message: Without wishing to be over-protective, I have reverted these two edits to my original version.  The architect's name is Thipps, not Phipps - I have checked against a printed copy of the text before reverting, and Thipps is correct.  And the article is written in UK English, not US, and therefore "enquiry" is acceptable, rather than "inquiry".  --Karenjc 23:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted Phipps back to Thipps, and inquiry to enquiry 

message: I do not know why there seemed to be a fight over circumcision. There's no reason to leave indignant comments about it - it's obvious from the text that Parker is alluding to the fact that the deceased can't be Sir Reuben because Sir Reuben was born to observant Jews and the corpse wasn't circumcised. --NellieBly (talk) 02:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circumcision 

message: The section on Literary significance is excellent, pulling together several sources about Sayers and this first novel. I did not write that section; I have read it and one of the sources as well, and learned a lot. - - Prairieplant (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than start class 

message: Might this here be a source for an earlier first edition cover? The one used is 1936, 13 years later, and is UK when US was first publisher. - - Prairieplant (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier cover image
Talk:Because I Can (Mice album)

message: Wow!  Talk about obscure.  Just going through my old CDs from the mid nineties, and followed up on it here.  I can't believe there's an entire article on this record!  Well done, though.  I guess you must be a fan.  I think the record is a bit of an overlooked classic.
--Labcoat 23:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Catwalk

message: Needs to conform to a more professional standard in my opinion.
: In June 2006 at the time of the above comment the page consisted of a very long plot summary, so that was something of an understatement. 
: Fifteen years later it could still do with a lot of work. -- 109.76.132.146 (talk) 03:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

message: The wavefront is moving at a velocity of at least Warp 6 (astonishing for a natural phenomenon or a natural result of an artificial activity), yet it takes 8 days to pass by the ship, and can be seen before it reaches the Enterprise! (it would be moving at least 216 times faster than light, so it would overtake the light shining from it) GBC 22:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logic errors
Talk:Stewart v. Abend

message: I noticed this was copied from this page but there is no copyright sign on this page exept the "Copyright-UNT" in the title. Does that mean that page was copyrighed?
Michaelas10 08:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?

message: That site is copyrighed.
Michaelas10 14:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: Supreme Court decisions are not copyrighted. They're in the public domain. The referenced webpage may assert copyright, but that is irrelevant. Just because a website slaps a copyright notice on uncopyrightable material does not mean they have a resulting copyright.
I could post The Bible on my website, slap a copyright notice on it, but that wouldn't make it copyrighted. The content is the test, not the inclusion of a copyright notice. If it's public domain material, as it is in this case, the copyright notice is irrelevant and void.
With that said, just slapping up the entire decision isn't an encyclopedia article. It's pointless. The article should summarize the case and point readers to the decision itself, which can be found on many websites.207.69.137.41 07:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is NOT a copyright violation

message: The article prievously stated, "Stewart v. Abend was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the copyright owner's right to permit the creation of a derivative work passes to the heirs of the author of the work, who are not bound by the original author's agreement to permit such use."
This is not a correct statement of the case. The importance of this case has nothing to do with heirs. It has to do with the right of the copyright holder to control creation of and/or exploitation of derivative works. I have accordingly revised the summation of the case.207.69.138.10 22:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect summation of case

message: This article never explains who or what "Abend" was.  A company?  A person?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.71.69.2 (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Abend? 

message: Can someone please explain what this case is about? How did it relate to the long-term inability to publish Woolrich stories, if it did, and the fact that Rear Window was not shown for years? I believe it is related, but that just is not clear in any specific way. I hope someone out there is still monitoring this article.--Stetsonharry (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear
Talk:Golden Gate (train)

message: I'm putting this here because it doesn't really fit in with the article text as it is now.
In January 1916 there were strong floods that stranded Governor Hiram Johnson and his party aboard the Saint between two washouts near Corona.  A newspaper account of the time suggested that it may be several days before they could be rescued. Slambo (Speak) 18:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting footnote
Talk:Nankana massacre

message: I think this page should be placed in the :Category:Sikh places. That would be a more appropriate place. Thanks Rajatjghai 08:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Gandhi's​ visit to nankana is not a fact, because nankana is a backward area located in central Punjab and an area with most of population as Muslims and Gandhi never visited any area of sub-continent with muslim population as majority(which is now in Pakistan), moreover according to history of nankana massacre, Gandhi's visit to nankana conflicts with the existing record... Ali khan dhudi (talk) 01:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gandhi's visit to nankana  
Talk:Heryshaf

message: User:Markh started this page by adding the following template:
ع	This article is about a person, place, or concept whose name is originally rendered in the Arabic script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Arabic script.
For more information, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Arabic).
:Heryshaf was not "originally rendered in the Arabic script." Egyptian ≠ Egyptian Arabic. Given that Modern Egypt uses Arabic, an Arabic transliteration might not be uncalled for, but it's certainly not necessary. --Iustinus 13:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What I mean is that Ihnasiyyah al-Madinah needs to be transliterated into Arabic script. Markh 15:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: oooooh, ok. That's definitely worth getting. The template text seemed to refer to the title. --Iustinus 18:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually reading the template, you are right. We should be able to flag the phrase that needs to be transliterated. Markh 19:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arabic Translation
Talk:Begin (The Millennium album)

message: Being a big fan of The Millennium, I really appreciate the rewrite of this page. 
The original page had a lot of "editorial" without references. Once again, kudos to the author!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.182.120.217 (talk) 01:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad you dig it! I just purchased the album this year and was like "yikes! where have you been all my life?!" One thing lead to another, and now I got a bit crazy about it! Glad to hear someone is reading these things. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page revamp
Talk:The Picts and the Martyrs

message: This book might well be in the Public Domain in the United States. It was published first in 1943, both in England and in the United States. As far as I can tell the US copyright wasn't renewed.--Alfredie (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: probably it is still in copyright, see the highlighted Note on this site   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabbler (talk • contribs) 21:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: My paperback copy of the book, bought in England in 1979, gives the first publication date and copyright date as 1942. Perhaps a mistake, or perhaps it was published in the UK in 1942 and then in the USA in 1943. Torve (talk) 06:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Domain Status
Category talk:The Dark Tower (series)

message: Suggestions for "Category" inclusion:
Because part of the structure of The Dark Tower is to gradually draw links between every single Stephen King work either directly, tangentially, or twice-removed, theoretically every single King-related article could be placed in the Category: Dark Tower listing.  I fail to see why that makes the existence of such an index useful.
Though it is understood that books like Insomnia and 'Salem's Lot are important to Tower mythos, the relevant books are repeatedly noted in relevant articles, and we already have exhaustive listings of this stuff in Category: Stephen King, Category: Novels by Stephen King, etc, etc, ad nauseum.
Thus I am deleting the Category: Dark Tower listings for articles that aren't about DT novels.  Please discuss if re-adding the category.  Chris Stangl 09:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:I (disambiguation)

message: I edited the article and removed "i, the imaginary unit equal to one of the square roots of −1". For more information, see the article about that subject.
Good to see all this extra content. However, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):
* "Each bulleted entry should, in almost every case, have exactly one navigable (blue) link. Including more than one link can confuse the reader; including no links at all makes the entry useless for further navigation."
* "Try to link to the disambiguated page with the first word in the line."
* "Unlike a regular article page, don't wikilink any other words in the line, unless they may be essential to help the reader determine where they might find the information."
* "The description associated with a link should be kept to a minimum, just sufficient to allow the reader to find the correct link."
* "Longer Lists: The list may be broken up by subject area."
* "Adding links to articles not yet written should be done with care."
I'll try and tidy this page up. -- DeLarge 09:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi User:Edokter. Re these edits using the maths template . My understanding is we try to minimise/eliminate the use of templates on dabs. For example using piped links rather than ship name templates (as we would in an article). I'm guessing the same should apply to maths templates such as . It's not in WP:MOSDAB though, but it's all about keeping dabs simple, and it may need clarifying at MOSDAB or the project. What is certain is that we prefer links at the start of the entry, so I'm undoing this edit for that, and we can discuss here. Regards Widefox; talk 17:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary reason to use these templates is to make these terms legible and distinguishable. It has nothing to do with linking, the placement of links or any ohter DAB-related MOS issue. Wihtout it, the capital "i" (I) is indistinguishable from the lower-case l. So I have restored the proper formatting of the mathematical related terms. -- User:Edokter  20:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maths templates 

message: The EP also contains a song called "I" (the only song) but I'm not sure whether it is necessary to list it again--Awesomewiki64 (talk) 17:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be redundant, especially since there is no separate article. -- User:Edokter  17:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Meshuggah's I also be listed under songs
Talk:Zentralstadion

message: Is it just me, or does this look like a mini version of Telstra Stadium? --bacco007 09:35, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, let's see, it's oval, has a football field in the middle and the audience sits in rows around the field. It's either a very strong case of plagiarism or it might be because all stadia basically look pretty much the same 
. BigBen212 16:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mixed pickle

message: *Proposal: Merge Mixed pickle into Indian pickle (keeping redirect).  Badagnani 09:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oh, I didn't reallize there's Indian pickle too. I see you merged achar in which is good, but this article has a meaning for mixed pickle that's not the Indian pickle, so it can't be a straight redirect. You might as well merge all the material on Indian pickle into that article though and leave this article with a link to it and the description of other meanins. - Taxman Talk 14:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I just noticed the description of Western "mixed pickle" with carrots, onions, etc.  I don't know if that's correct info.--Badagnani 14:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A google search for mixed pickle, though dominated by the Indian variety, did come up with a few recipes that confirmed my suspicion that western mixed pickle is made very similar to pickled cucumbers, in vinegar, not oil. I added a cite for that type, though that may be better merged into other articles on pickling and pickles, and make this mixed pickle article a disambiguation. In either case, go ahead and merge the rest of the material into Indian pickle. - Taxman Talk 15:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I just noticed pickle is kind of a mess, it redirects to a disambig which is bad practice. I'll move the disambig to pickle and try to clean it up. So far it doesn't link to Indian pickle, but does link to Lime pickle which is yet another redundant article in need of cleanup. - Taxman Talk 15:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I have prepared an article on the western style mixed pickle, ie vegetables pickled in vinegar unlike the asian oil style, but I am unable to put it up or merge into the current 'mixed pickle' due to the current article being tied to asian cuisine. How about renaming the current article 'mixed pickle, asian' and I can put up my notes as 'mixed pickle, western' or something along those lines to fall into the correct conventions. The appropriate links can be put in each article pointing to the various articles on asian or western cuisines. -  Geotek 18:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed pickle - western