lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of Gdańsk

message: "With the German defeat the planned genocide of the Polish population, who were deemed by the German authorities to be "subhuman," was averted and Poles returned to Gdańsk."   1.)  This is wrong.There was no significant pre-war Polish population in Danzig, so there were not many Poles to "return". It was settled new by Poles from main Poland.  2.) The sentence is awkward and clearly political. Nazi view  on Poles do not imply that Poles had a reason to deport Germans from their homes.  Please correct!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.2.105 (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: of course that`s good reason to kick people who hate you from territory of your country 83.21.252.24 (talk) 07:00, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Charlotte, Queen of Cyprus

message: There were two Louises of Savoy: the father (b.1413-d.1465) and the son (b.1436-d.1482). Louis the son married a Charlotte of Lusignan. Would these Charlottes be the same person because Lusignan was the name of the castle at Kingdom of Cyprus. Ktsquare (talk) 21:45, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given her date of birth, is she daughter of Amadea Palaeologina of Montferrat? Or is her year of birth incorrect?
: It may be the year. This page, which I think derives from Europaeische Stammtafeln, gives her birth year as 1442/3. This govt. publication also calls her the daughter of Helena. I'm going to change the birthdate. Choess 20:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth/Identity of mother

message: Where is that picture from? Of her holding the book. If there's no source, it has to be deleted. Nivakmessi124 (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her photo
Talk:Mikado

message: I've added the following caveat paragraph from a 1903 scholarly source, but I'm uncertain about its utility in this specific context.  
:"We purposely avoid, in spite of its wide usage in foreign literature, the misleading term Mikado.  If it be not for the natural curiosity of the races, which always seeks something novel and loves to call foreign things by foreign names, it is hard to understand why this obsolete and ambiguous word should so sedulously be retained.  It originally meant not only the Sovereign, but also his house, the court, and even the State, and its use in historical writings causes many difficulties which it is unnecessary to discuss here in detail.  The native Japanese employ the term neither in speech nor in writing.  It might as well be dismissed with great advantage from sober literature as it has been for the official documents." -- Asakawa, Kan'ichi. (1903). The Early Institutional Life of Japan,  Tokyo: Shueisha [New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp., 1963], p. 25 n.1.
I wonder ...?  This obviously becomes an invitation for comment ...? --Ooperhoofd 14:25 & :30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
:First, the 2nd most rigid thing in the main ("article") namespace is a Dab page, since (to paraphrase Lenin) "the purpose of a disambiguation page is to disambiguate". Complete sentences on Dab pages are very rare, and the paragraph cannot stay on the accompanying one.
: That being said, the paragraph is extremely valuable on this talk page, and it may be important to paraphrase it in at least one article. If we can confirm its basic point (which i think is likely), with sources lacking its "voice crying in the wilderness" tone (which raises the slight possibility that this scholar is the only one concerned about this usage issue), we probably need several entries at least vaguely like
:* Mikado, ancient term for Emperor of Japan
:* Mikado, ancient term for Empire of Japan
: --Jerzy•t 17:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding information in disambiguation context

message: I find in Google tests:
: about 5,910,000 for Mikado
: about 722,000 for Mikado -titipu -gilbert -Sullivan -savoy
I was about to conclude that about 88% of Web uses are for the Savoy opera, subtitled "or, The Town of Titipu",  by W.S. Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan. I was about to move the accompanying Dab page to Mikado (disambiguation), to make room for Mikado to be a Rdr to The Mikado. For good or ill, i then found
: about 671,000 for "The Mikado"
: about 2,170,000 for Mikado -"The Mikado" -titipu -gilbert -Sullivan -savoy
I don't understand those results, so i leave the matter for further discussion. --Jerzy•t 17:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Final Fantasy VII

message: Hey Final Fantasy keepers, Panini here. I would like to direct your attention to the second paragraph of the Paper Mario series' development section. It talks about what Nintendo did after Final Fantasy VII was taken to Playstation; long story short, Paper Mario came to be because of it. Is it worth mentioning here somewhere? Panini!🥪 11:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, looks like Nintendo were already planning for Paper Mario's development--Square just turned down their offer to develop it because of work on FF7. A sentence or two could be illuminating and provide extra context. 2601:346:C281:79F0:1D1E:4707:EBAD:4C5F (talk) 05:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More FF7 Legacy? 

message: Inducted in 2018:  --Mika1h (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[World Video Game Hall of Fame]] 

message: * https://www.vg247.com/final-fantasy-7-26-anniversary-kitase-interview Sergecross73 msg me 16:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New interview
Category talk:Penguins

message: I understand that some users are very strongly against the existence of this category. For what it's worth I consider it to be harmless. Secretlondon 22:30, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catagory's existence 

message: 
I created an userbox for those who love penguins and support the catagory.  Just put around--Bedford 23:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox
Talk:International HapMap Project

message: This is seemingly a Work of the United States Government and so not copyrighted. --Rikurzhen 23:16, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
:Copyrights are not the only issue here. Per WP:WWIN, Wikipedia is not a mirror. -AED 07:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Does anyone else feel this reads more like a FAQ or a press release rather than an encyclopedia? 203.34.41.43 05:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The first version of the page was directly copied from a work of the U.S. gov't which is thus public domain. --Rikurzhen 19:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lots of the stuff now needs rewording to be less in the future tense, given the progress since the first version was written. Pseudomonas 11:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylistic problems 

message: It looks like this group continues the work of the "SNP Consortium", which is also a funding member.  That previous consortium should probably also be explained.  It would also be interesting to have a list of notable scientific discoveries made as a result of this project. -- Beland (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion request 

message: To a reader who is not familiar with the details, the characteristics of the HapMap Project sound very similar to those of the Human Variome Project. What are the differences? Please mention those in the intro. -Pgan002 (talk) 06:11, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference from Human Variome Project? 
Talk:Hawaiian honeycreeper

message: Names of species capitalized on Wikipedia; warrants move of this page to new page titled Hawaiian Honeycreeper instead of Hawaiian honeycreeper (lowercase h) --James Easton 00:00, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hawaiian honeycreepers are a group of birds, not a species, so no caps -  as in, for example woodpeckers, the group, but Great Spotted Woodpecker, a species. jimfbleak 05:03, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Title capitalization

message: Cannot remember the reference, but there is something interesting said about the smell of these birds that even persists in old skins. Shyamal (talk) 04:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smell 

message: I think this article should go back to the family status, as even HBW 15 (which will be released in 2010) will use the family drepanididae (see http://ibc.lynxeds.com/family/hawaiian-honeycreepers-drepanididae) --Melly42 (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family status 

message: This article does not explain the status of the honeycreepers at all. Why is it that they have had their status changed recently? And why is it in dispute? I can tell it is not just an issue of how big each taxonomic rank should be. I remember reading somewhere that all the honeycreepers may be descended from the Common Rosefinch, but I haven't found areference for this yet. If I do I will add it to her, but can anybody try improving this and removing the confusing parts of the text. Innotata 23:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to form a natural group, so I wonder why they aren't just kept in the tribe Drepaninini, as proposed already in 1982. FunkMonk (talk) 06:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of taxonomic status 

message: This article says the Hawaiian honecreepers' closest relatives are the Asian rosefinches. —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 00:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosefinches
Talk:Anahita/Archive 1

message: User:Bacchiad, on the ball, moves fast! Wetman 00:12, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: correct. Persian *Anahiti's "mother" attribute is not derived from her Babylonian-Akkadian analogue. -- Fullstop 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: This is true of the context of the rushing river (which is what Aredvi Sura Anahita cosmological role is, cf. Lommel's Saraswati-Anahita). Nonetheless, the "immaculate" meaning, as it appears in Western Iranian languages, could justifiable also apply to "pure" water and healing, but presumably not with wisdom. :) -- Fullstop 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To Khoikhoi and others:
:how do you all feel about a merge with Aredvi Sura Anahita?
:-- Fullstop 10:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge II

message: The Greek form is Anaitis, right? AnonMoos 17:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes (among other Greek "translations") -- Fullstop 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek
Talk:Hawaiian hibiscus

message: has it that species names on Wikipedia are to be capitalized; warrants a move of this page to Hawaiian Hibiscus as opposed to Hawaiian hibiscus (lowercase h) --James Easton 00:20, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Have no problem myself with that suggestion; however Hibiscus (a genus) and hibiscus (a common name for plants in Hibiscus and perhaps related genera with similar flowers) are really different words and this article is intended to cover the latter. - Marshman 00:33, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: ARRGGHH!!!  Common names of birds are capitalized, because the Audubon Society decided to do so and maintains a list of "official common names", to avoid the problem of changes in scientific names.  Sometimes common names of other vertebrates are capitalized, but usually not.  Names of plants and other animals should NEVER, EVER be capitalized (unless it includes a proper name, like "Hawaiian", obviously).  KarlM 09:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This. — LlywelynII 02:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps

message: should of course be used in writing Hawaiian text, which should be wrapped in haw  tags. It (of course) should never be used for the common English placenames Hawaii, Oahu, &c. in English-language text. If you have a "colonial oppression" issue with that, kindly take it to Talk:Hawaii, Talk:Oahu, &c. and get those pages moved first. They weren't very interested last time around, but it's been a few years. — LlywelynII 02:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Okina

message: Shouldn't each scientific name have its own article? Propose to break this article up and move each section to its own article titled with the scientific name. Wasp32 (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do the scientific names redirect here?
Wikipedia talk:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance

message: Just noticed an entry on Wikipedia showing the title of the first Harry Potter movie as "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone". The  actual title is "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone". Thought you should know. Erarbon (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to Wikipedia entry 

message: this page is helpful. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 22:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  note
Talk:Massachusetts Route 1A

message: I presume the split suggested is for the various pieces of Route 1A.  I would oppose such a move.
The reasoning is, fundamentally, that the split would imply that there are four highways named Route 1A in Massachusetts.  This isn't true: there's only one Route 1A, and it runs 94 miles from Attleboro to Salisbury.  As the EOT GIS data show, Route 1A in Boston continues from milepost 48, picking up from Route 1A in Dedham (milepost 27) after being hidden by higher order highways for 20 miles.  In fact, the example given for higher order highways hiding mileposts of lower order highways is the Southeast Expressway, which is I-93, US 1, Route 3, Route 1A and Route 3A.  Sam8 20:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to eliminate this tag since it's been 3 months with no support for a split. JohnnyBGood  t c VIVA! 01:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Go go

message: This page is an accident (needs to be deleted; trailing underscore after "Go_go" links incorrectly).  Correct term to link is "Go go" without the trailing space.
False. Suffixes in parentheses must have a space before them. For example, I originally created Sweetheart(company) but then someone renamed it Sweetheart (company). 66.245.23.108 01:07, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: There's a series called Gogo Loves Englishhttp://www.gogolovesenglish.com/ published by Longman Asia. I don't think it's WP:notable though. 
Gogo is a sort of alien. There is a boy and a girl, and three smaller aliens. m.e. (talk) 09:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gogo Loves English
Talk:Elisha Collier

message: Why is this person "Living"?
We need a category fix  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.75.32.41 (talk) 07:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Paul A (talk) 02:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:Emperor of America

message: Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 13 to Jul 23 2004, consensus was to keep and list on cleanup.  Discussion:
Appears to be a book blurb from a magazine -possibly copyvio. Mostly undecipherable. --Rmhermen 04:24, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
* Hmm... keep if it's a well-known book, but shouldn't this redirect to Emperor Norton? ;) - Mustafaa 05:32, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Jewellery

message: Any clue as to why I am unable to edit this page? Is there a special trick to category pages? Brassratgirl 04:35, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this category Jewellery instead of Jewelry? Is there any particular justification for using British English over American for this category? It seems to me that since more than 2/3 of native English speakers are American, we should use American spelling unless there's a good reason not to (ie. the page for kilometre or any pages connected to a British English using nation). Does such a reason exist in this case? Is San Fransisco's diamond district not as cool as London's or something? -Carl 01:57, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no Wikipedia standard, so we try to be accepting of all English spellings, with emphasis simply on consistency within articles. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English NickelShoe 23:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Why does there need to be justification for Commonwealth spelling? Is there any justification for American spelling? McLerristarr | Mclay1 06:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Jewelry redirects here. People should just take care not to categorise pages into redirect categories. McLerristarr | Mclay1 06:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commonwealth spelling?
Talk:Schreck Ensemble

message: Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 13 to Jul 23 2004, consensus was not reached.  Discussion:
From Cleanup: Schreck ensemble notable? has had a VFD tag since May but hasn't been listed (moved from Cleanup by SimonP)
*Keep, seems to be a real band; ~700 Google hits. -Sean Curtin 07:39, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sodium percarbonate

message: Compounds containing sodium percarbonate have been associated with pet bird deaths. Some manufacturers acknowledge this and warn against using the compounds where there are birds.
Mixing sodium percarbonate cleaners with other cleaners has reportedly resulted in adverse reactions and illness in humans. Mixing cleaners should never be done.
:This entry should have a safety section. Nicmart (talk) 01:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pet safety and human safety 

message: I'm new to this so I'm not really sure what the copyright rules are but this page appears to be copied pretty much word for word from this website:
http://www.norkem.com/productDetail.asp?productID=135&groupID=20§ionID=1
Is that allowed and if so should it be referenced? Katkatkatrina 11:06, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, wholesale copying is not allowed and in such a case referencing alone is not sufficient. I've reduced it for the moment to a so-called stub leaving in only the most obvious facts and adding two neutral links. --Tikiwont 12:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright issue 

message: The IUPAC name lists tetrasodium but the structure shows one sodium...and that sodium is uncharged!--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 13:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, I don't even think this is a molecular compound. Perhaps a crystal structure would be more accurate. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name, structure, and chemistry 

message: Sodium percarbonate has a DANGER sign on the jar because it is oxygen and should not be used by an open flame. 
I pulled this sentence out of the uses section because it's both unsourced and awful grammar.  If anybody wants to revise it and reinsert, go ahead but this sentence as it stands is embarrassing. Wasp32 (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danger 

message: I believe it would be useful to list the other, less common, chemical names by which this chemical is known.
* sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate
* sodium carbonate peroxide
* carbonic acid disodium salt compound with hydrogen peroxide
From https://3.imimg.com/data3/RA/LM/MY-119854/sodium-percarbonate.pdf
Also, this chemical is used in "Easy Clean" from LD Carlson.
https://storefront.ldcarlson.com/storefrontCommerce/itemDetail.do?item-id=2882
SDCrayon (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request information be added
Talk:Art Nouveau Jewellery

message: Material in this entry is at Art Nouveau. Wetman 06:10, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Right -- I just split it out from the Jewellery entry without checking to see if it was duplicated. I've given a redirect back to Art Nouveau but left link on jewellery page in case this page ever expands beyond what's on the Art Nouveau page. Brassratgirl 19:52, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:The Client (novel)

message: How exactly is this reflected in the movie? The kid acts like a VCR, and basically lives his live as seen on TV, but I still think stating something like "the movie reflects negative influences of TV on children" in the opening paragraph is way too POV. 213.172.234.112 22:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. He's threatened by the mob (in the elevator) like he'd seen in movies. He reflects often to movies, but it also happens in the story. Quote: "The mob never forgets", he heard it from TV, but it has also happened to him. I remove the phrase. Kassie 14:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Negative influences of television on children?

message: It says that it's suggested the article gets split into separate entries but I don't think there's really enough information FOR two articles. --User.lain 15:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto. AirOdyssey 20:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree. Removing tag after three months. Original nominator did not provide any explanation, and it does not have enough info for two (or three, as there's a book, a movie and a series) articles. BalthCat 21:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article splitting

message: Is this about the movie or about the book? The stories differs somewhat. The article starts about the novel, but there's also a movie box on the right side. Which is a bit confusing. Though, the article could refer to both. Kassie 14:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie or book? 

message: Is it really necessary, it just takes up some space that isn't needed. It could be added to a different section of the article...— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.64.146 (talk • contribs) 23:24, May 21, 2007‎ (UTC)
:Fix'd, it wast not needed anyway. Marlith T/C 00:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagline 

message: I changed the shock link from "shock (medical)" to "shock (psychological"; the original link led to a disambiguation page, but there's nothing ambiguous about what kind of shock a child would go into after seeing someone stick a gun in their mouth and pull the trigger. Misterdoe (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ricky's condition is best described as "catatonic", without having to go into extensive medical detail. — QuicksilverT @ 07:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Shock" link 

message: I think the film is mentioned too much in the article. for example, Susan Sarandon is mentioned 3 times. The film has its own article and should not be in focus here. Agreed? Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 06:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film adaptation information
Talk:New York Post

message: Should political = Conservative be removed from the infobox of New York Post? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Yes, per u:Peter Gulutzan. Alaexis¿question? 08:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Close requested here. I'm aware of the advice in Closing the discussion but the matter under discussion is contentious, as evidenced by the back-and-forth removals and re-insertions and the earlier thread. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on political alignment in infobox
Talk:Diving mammals

message: Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 13 to Jul 23 2004, consensus was to merge and redirect.  Discussion:
Article was listed for cleanup, but in researching the topic I found that the material is alread covered (and better) in the article Mammalian diving reflex. Furthermore, it seems unlikely to me that a user looking for this information would search for this title. A redirect from Diving reflex may be in order as well. I apologize for not listing this properly, but the instructions for adding VfD pages have disappeared (!) and I don't remember how to do it. Jeeves 07:46, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)