lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:William B. Allison

message: This section is hardly written from a Neutral Point of View:
"It was just as well. No Republican senator was so well fitted for the duties of irresponsible statesmanship, or positioned so well to assist the banking and railroad interests in their exploitation of average Americans."
Someone who knows more about Allison should edit this to be less biased.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathaniel Greene (talk • contribs) 21:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPV
Talk:SSE4

message: I removed the redirect to the SSSE3 talk page. SSE4 is different from SSSE3.
SSE4 talk at IDF Beijing 2007 revealed everything; I'm filling in the tables now Fivemack 15:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: > Intel is using the marketing term HD Boost to refer to SSE4.
link is dead/redirects to home page. google shows no reference. Seems this statement is invalid now. guessing intel changed everything wrt it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.84.235.22 (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HD Boost SSSE4 

message: This article does not says how long are the registers. Probably 128 bits. 181.118.72.35 (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  register length in bits 

message: The article says that Windows 11 24H2 requires the CPU to support POPCNT and LZCNT, but I couldn't find any mention of LZCNT in the sources mentioned. I think it might be a factual error. 2A02:2F0E:A14:B900:C88A:D5DC:B2EC:9722 (talk) 23:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Windows 11 24H2
Talk:Xiph.Org Foundation

message: Xiphophorus hellerii is not a spelling mistake. Please see Green swordtail for an explanation. --Kjoonlee 08:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: It does not seem appropriate to have a standalone page for Tarkin when it is an apparently non-influential codec that is on hold or discontinued.  It may be better to merge it into this page as a defunct project of historical interest. Saligron 07:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess we could create a Discontinued Xiph.Org Foundation Projects page, or something in that regard.  Ogg Squish, Tarkin and iceshare could be thrown there.--Saoshyant talk / contribs (please join WP:Portugal or WP:SPOKEN) 13:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Tarkin]] 

message: It would seem that the current organization of the projects list is a little lacking, with discontinued projects being given a small addendum instead of a separate section. Would it be worth it to separate these two into different sections under one project header? Calmbit (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move "discontinued" projects to separate sub-section 

message: Please update the logo to SVG format: https://wiki.xiph.org/File:Xiph-Logo.svg O1o1o2 (talk) 12:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: .--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! 95.25.248.0 (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 4

message: Note: Voting will be done purely on this talk page as with any other straw poll, the email thingy didn't work.--Nilfanion (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. I would vote for Ioke, but it's still active. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Support as well. Just had too big of an impact not to vote for. bob rulz 22:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Seconded. Titoxd(?!?) 07:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominations for next edition

message: Nominations open
*Typhoon Saomai (2006) - has already an article, and made a large impact in China. RaNdOm26 16:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. I would vote for Ioke, but it's still active. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Support as well. Just had too big of an impact not to vote for. bob rulz 22:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: SotM

message: If needed, voting will begin September 1
*User:Nilfanion- No explanation needed :P Hurricanehink (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. Titoxd(?!?) 07:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MotM
Talk:Ford Galaxy

message: Why no Automatic gearbox for the new model? 
Whats the point of not offering one? 
Tals pages relate only to the article, and not the Product/Subject. 1B6 09:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Someone just changed the heading for the life of the first version of the (European MPV called) Ford Galaxy to 1995 - 2006 (formerly ... - 2005) because, as s/he pointed out, the thing was available for sale for more than half of 2006.   And YET, we think the last one rolled off the Portuguese production line in 2005 (after which MPVs from that plant were all badged as VWs or Seats).   To judge by the give away prices on first generation Ford Galaxys during the first half of 2006, Ford had a bit of a struggle to empty their parking lots of the first version (rhd UK versions anyhow) ahead of the launch to the market place of the second.   But in fact it is a common situation during the period when demand drops off for run-out models while plants are tooling up for new / replacement versions.   A whole lot of 'new' old shape Toyota Previas were sold in Europe in 2006 though I'm pretty sure than by 2006 the only 'Previa' in producation in Japan was the 'new' new shape currently not offered in Europe.
Is anyone aware of any general wiki-rule concerning whether a car's model life ends when (1) the last car of that type comes off the line or (2) the manufacture stops offering 'new' cars of the type for sale?   Or (3) something else? Charles01 07:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defining Model Life

message: In my educated opinion this wiki has the clasification for the 1st and 2nd generation of Galaxy wrong. As owner of the Ford Galaxy Owners Club, we have always referred to the Galaxy as MK1 (1995-2000), MK2 (2000-2006) and MK3 (2006-)
Ford's definition of the differing faces of the Galaxy have been Galaxy (1995-2000) Galaxy Facelift (2000-2006) and All New Galaxy (2006-) which concurs with our marking of the Galaxies as being in 3 clear time periods and generations. The Ford Escort Europe Wiki concurs with this method of defining the generations and marking of the model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Escort_%28Europe%29) where the MKIV was just a facelift of the MKIII.
If you need any help in adding any detailed information and splitting the current marking of this wiki then please just ask and I'll be glad to help out. HairyPlateEater 23:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect generation definition 

message: I undid the recent edit by an unregistered user as the US Galaxie and European Galaxy are plainly two different vehicles from different eras.  Both articles contain reciprocal links to the other and I would think this is sufficient to avoid confusion.  juux ☠ 09:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ford Galaxy / Ford Galaxie 

message: The 1965 Jean-Luc Godard film Alphaville (Alphaville, Une Etrange Aventure de Lemmy Caution) contains a reference to a 'Ford Galaxy'. Did this have anything to do with the naming of the Galaxy or is it just a coincidence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.66.76 (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphaville
Category talk:International relations scholars

message: We have to define this well--does Kissinger count?  Strictly academic or do policy makers (M.A. types) count? gren グレン 08:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a very good question. I do not think that PhD is a good criterion, but I understand how you meant it. In my opinion, people who have been active in the academia (universities, research institutes) and significantly contributed to the field (i.e. published at least one book or a frequently cited academic article) should be included. I would add Rice to the list, but I am not that sure about Kissinger. Any other opinions here? Tankred 22:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Citation needed/Archive 1

message: Attention 90% of people
Template:Fact is what you're looking for
That is all. ⁪frotht 21:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Rather than showing a "deleted" message for this page, why not redirect to the appropriate Wikipedia help page which tells how users can insert a "citation needed" tag?  This is the page of interest Wikipedia:Citing sources, and the fact tag (the word fact enclosed by double curly braces) is the one they're looking for.  Robert K S 08:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As of today, it's finally happened.  However, I believe the re-direct (to Citation) is still unhelpful.  As mentioned above, users who enter "citation needed" into Wikipedia are really looking for Wikipedia:Citing sources.  If I am able, I will be bold and make the change myself. Robert K S 22:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The real question is why hasn't this been done yet! But I'm also curious as to who thought it was a good idea to protect the redirect in the first place. -- Randall00 Talk 22:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: This subsection relates to a RfC posted on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Style issues for comments re restoring this redirect. Created 12:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment: Reinstate redirect

message: Could this page be directed to Template:Fact as that template is very hard to find from the citation page or any of the citation pages it links to. A few times I've wanted to add a  but have had to search pages which use the template due to the complete lack of (visible) information on the citation pages. - Diceman 19:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would make sense. Finding the correct way to type "citation needed" in an article is currently a real pain in the backside if you're not a sufficiently frequent editor to have committed the correct combination of brackets to memory 172.201.125.172 21:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Template:Fact]] 

message: I searched for the phrase "citation needed" not because I was looking for something else (as suggested by the talk above) but because I was looking for something about the spread of the phrase itself. Something like this in fact: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/citation-needed   Jacob (talk) 12:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a draft at User:Andrew Gray/Citation needed. --John Vandenberg (chat) 16:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? Why not an actual page
Talk:Maneckji Limji Hataria

message: This article does not relate to India. At least not directly. It relates to Zoroastrianism and their history in Iran. Therefor I have removed the classification of India related stub. Shabdiz 07:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: fine. I think the tag was automatically placed for all articles in the 'Indian activists' category, presumably under the impression that "activists" implied anti-British activists. -- Fullstop 08:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Dollart

message: This article seems a little short on information. I would suggest adding the 'stub' tag to it. 24.251.168.56 08:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: *Wasn't there a plan last century to dry it and make a polder ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hektor (talk • contribs) 22:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Polder

message: I've added two maps and therefore replace the Map Request template. Note that I didn't find a current map, though. Classical geographer (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps added
Talk:Mark Zieman

message: I've tagged this page...seems to be very anti-Zieman, not the NPOV that it should be. --Tim4christ17 08:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no action, I'm going to clean it up myself. --Tim4christ17 talk 20:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed most of the bias - I still don't like the quote thrown in there without appropriate context, but am leaving it.  I also deleted some unsourced information - if I accidentally deleted something important, feel free to re-add it, just remember to source it.  --Tim4christ17 talk 21:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Category talk:Religious studies journals

message: The American Muslim is listed as a journal... but it seems to be a magazine (not peer reviewed, etc.)  I just want a second opinion as to whether or not it should be here. gren グレン 08:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about journal

message: These seem mostly like religious studies journals, the study of what is already known, not theological investigations. Merging back theology seems a shame since some of those are in a higher category. Like mixing 5th grade math books with advanced mathematical journals with PhD theses summarized. The 5th grade books should be by themselves IMO. Student7 (talk) 00:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Not sure merger is the way to go
Talk:JSP model 2 architecture

message: I don't think that a merger is appropriate. "Model 2" describes a design philosophy for WebApps. It is not necessarily linked to a certain view technology (JSP). You can (in theory) create a model 2 application while using another technology like Velocity as well (there are many very good MVC / Model 2 frameworks, so I wouldn't call this approach pratical). AnimalFriend 09:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should not be merged. (Model 1) is not really used any more, the name (Model 1) and (Model 2) has only historical significance.  May be the page title could be changed to 'Model 2 Request Handling(Web)'. Ervinn 14:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This page is misleading. MVC model 2 is a pattern. This page makes it sound like its specific to Java at best or JSP at worst. I suggest this page is removed and model1 and model2 explained briefly under model-view-controller NickHollingsworth (talk) 16:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is misleading 

message: I'd like to add a "criticism" section for completeness, but I need help.
A common criticism of Model 2 is that even in an MVC context, it does not truly achieve the MVC paradigm. The reason commonly stated is that eventing is missing in Model 2. i.e. If the model is updated, there is no event generated to let the page know to re-render. The software must wait for the user to refresh the page, thus polling the model for updates. 
While I have heard this criticism many times, I cannot find a suitable reference for the article. Does anyone have at least a blog entry or a published article that makes this criticism? Please keep in mind that forum posts are a non-starter. 
If you know of any other supportable criticisms, please add them to the article.
Thanks in advance! Jbanes (talk) 05:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 
Talk:Dimitrie Gusti

message: About his party membership: I had been guessing that he was a member of one or each of the two parties, but could not find relevant info up to now. Hitchins, in Romania. 1866-1944 mentions him among the intellectuals in the Peasants' Party (Humanitas, 1998; p.387), and he remained with the PNT given that he served as minister under Vaida and Maniu. Dahn 09:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Institute of Statistics and Census of Argentina

message: The correct plural for "census" is "censuses". I think, then, it might be useful to correct it.
Past of "hold" is "held".
Index should also be written in plural because there are more than one, hence there should be "indexes on prices to consumers or customers", rather than a literal translation. Unless, of course, the rules of Wikipedia establish that way of writing.
Friendly,--Mbertoni 09:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Censuses

message: We should add a bit on the 2007 clash between the K government and Indec officials, on the preasures for a change on the INDEC's methodology. --Mariano(t/c) 12:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 incidents

message: Why does somebody keep on removing relevant, sourced, neutral content from this article? bobrayner (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added two more sources. If anybody still disagrees, I can provide a lot more sources and build more content based on these sources... bobrayner (talk) 00:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It keeps on happening. No discussion, just blanking of sourced content. This is frustrating. Please stop. bobrayner (talk) 12:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Kahastok talk 13:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

text:  I agree as well. The Economist is a trusted and reliable source. -  Cwobeel (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV problem 
Talk:Charles L. Kelly

message: removed tags for {more footnotes|date=April 2014}} and .  I'll leave  for now, but I'll get to that soon
Some of the stuff about what he did in his hometown after the war may seem trivial (class president, American Legion, Junior Chamber of Commerce), but I think it speaks to Character.
Don.H.40 (talk) 06:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: I've been heavily editing
Talk:International Longshore and Warehouse Union

message: The quotation from the San Francisco Chronicle in the lede – "the aristocrat of the working class; a top member can earn over well over $100,000 a year with excellent benefits" – strikes me as incoherent. "Over well over" is not really a meaningful English construction and strikes me as a probable editing error (on the part of the Chronicle's editors, if it employs editors). Should we really be giving such prominence to quotations that fail certain basic standards of coherence and readability? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed this trivial typo per MOS:PMC. Feel free to take your concerns about the San Francisco Chronicle to WP:RSN, but such nitpicking is not usually considered a hallmark of a truly NPOV approach to editing. Regards, HaeB (talk) 00:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Francisco Chronicle quote 

message: in section "Survival outside CIO and return to AFL–CIO", it states: "Expulsion had no real effect...". But there is no statement that the union was expelled, or expelled from what. The article needs to say what it was expelled from and what the reasons were (according to both sides). 
The CIO said the union was Communist dominated. https://depts.washington.edu/dock/Harry_Bridges_intro.shtml 
The union says it was for "alleged Communist influence" https://www.ilwu.org/history/the-ilwu-story/ . 
I plan to add these facts to the article. Ttulinsky (talk) 19:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explusion? What expulsion?
Talk:Tom Miller (politician)

message: Recently, during an interview of Tom Miller which aired on Iowa public radio on August 27, 2009, Tom Miller stated that he was chairman of Ted Kennedy's 1980 Iowa Caucus campaign while Tom Miller was living in Panora (Lake Panorama), Iowa.
Can anyone else provide some support for this?  Any references?  Do any Des Moines Register, Des Moines Tribune, or Cedar Rapids Gazette articles provide support for this, too?
Thanks.
66.43.253.135 (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ted Kennedy's chairman for the 1980 Iowa Caucus

message: What issues has he been sponsoring and developing and managing during his several terms in office? MaynardClark (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: Text and references copied from Frank J. Kelley to Tom Miller (politician),  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: Tom Miller is not the longest-serving state AG. Doug La Follette of neighboring Wisconsin has continuously served since 1983, and also served from '75 to '79.-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.199.190.66 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracy
Talk:William S. Kenyon (Iowa politician)

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/William Squire Kenyon was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 20:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Knute Nelson

message: So, did Knute Nelson die in Alexandria, Minnesota, as it says in the text?  Or did he die in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as it says in the infobox?
Or neither?  The Minnesota Historical Society's death certificate index says a Knute Nelson died in Polk County, Minnesota (perhaps Crookston, Minnesota) on 26 Jun 1923, but that differs from the 28 April dod given here; Alexandria is in Douglas County and may well have been his place of last residence. Maybe the Alexandria place of death came from confusion with a different Knute Nelson who died near there also in 1923? Or perhaps the 28 April date came from a different Knute Nelson who died in Pennsylvania?  Gene Nygaard 09:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the biography Norwegian Yankee, he died on the train en route from Washington, DC to Alexandria, right after they passed through the Timonium railroad station. (It says they passed through Timonium a little after 8 pm, and he died at 8:15 pm). From what I can tell, the train simply continued to his home town and his burial. --Leifern 20:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death?

message: This is a bit of a long-term project for me, and I obviously welcome other participants. Most of the material so far is drawn from the biography Norwegian Yankee, but I am trying to cross-reference and supplement from other sources, notably the New York Times and other sources I can find in sources.google.com.  What needs to be done to complete this article and bring it to at least GA status is:
# Finish the chronology of his Senate years to his death
# A bit more on his personal life - nothing the least bit scandalous here, but through a series of unfortunate events, he left no successors
# More on his legacy - Norwegian Yankee has one point of view, but we obviously shouldn't uncritically accept it. Nelson's career spanned several political eras and touched on several important political issues that he either formed or that formed him. This will take time to work out but will probably form a good contribution to the political account in WP of the time he was active. --Leifern (talk) 02:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality assessment 
Talk:Classical reenactment

message: I would like to see this article expanded. I added: "The Roman Army did not remain static and, whilst sometimes demonstrating these changes in displays of the evolving equipment and appearance of the legionary, most groups also focus on a particular time period. The most popular period is probably the 1st-2nd century, with legionaries wearing the characteristic segmented armour illustrated on Trajan's Column. However, some groups portray the Late Roman legion, after the army reforms of Diocletian."
I would welcome something on Greek & 'Celtic' re-enactment, if you're out there.  Salvianus 09:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I propose that this article be renamed to Classical antiquity reenactment, Classical period reenactment or Classical reenactment since that's what it actually deals with. "Ancient" in this context is so vague as to be meaningless. Compare Classical antiquity (dealing with the period of Greek and Roman dominance of their area) with Ancient history (everything from the first recorded history circa 3300 BC to the early Middle Ages). Thoughts? Cmadler (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming
Talk:First Allied Airborne Army

message: Neither INFATUATE nor COMET were First Allied Airborne Army operations.
INFATUATE was requested with an outline by 21st Army Group and was rejected.
COMET was a 21st Army Group plan in full with the required airborne units attached. Enderwigginau (talk) 08:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-FAAA operations