Talk:Personal luxury car

message: This article in its entirity, is on thin ice.  Essentially the term is a marketing term, and has no outside agreed on definition.  Why build a reference article around complete supposition?  842U (talk) 16:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has merit in explaining the term, which is rather often used in Wikipedia. It, however, makes the mistake of trying to focus on the ephemeric concept of personal luxury car rather than the term. A good example of would be the article supermini car, which contains some elaboration beyond the definition, but it is mostly focused on where the term came from and what was it applied to. I believe this article could be similarly salvaged. Kind, PrinceGloria (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What exactly is a Personal Luxury Vehicle

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Personal luxury car's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "allpar":
From Dodge Phoenix: The Phoenix Retrieved from allpar.com on 12 September 2008
From Chrysler Neon: 
From Chrysler Cirrus: 
From History of Chrysler: 
From Dodge Super Bee: 
From Chrysler 300M: 
From Imperial (automobile): 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Personal luxury car]] 

message: There is no justification to include an image of a specialty car made by a minor custom car maker, especially in the lead section. The "Revival" Stutz was a heavily modified GM-based car that priced at over $100,000. This model did not represent the market segment described in this article and it was not a mass-produced personal luxury car. Thanks, CZmarlin (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead images 

message: :Article contains two errors - it fails to explain how/why cars like the MBZ SL (300K units) ate the top of the PLC market beginning in the late 1960's. During the import boom, Americans can and did trade in their Lincolns and Cadillacs on functionally equivalent MBZ's, Jaguars, and BMW's (which were certainly not 'sports cars'). These consumers did not abandon 'Personal Luxury' as a concept. Also, article assumes that PLC market classification is synonymous with American built vehicle. American made PLC's were largely uncompetitive overseas, but PLC is still just a market classification. That does not prove that a car sold into the personal luxury car market, but built in Europe or Japan, is somehow not a PLC. PLawrence99cx (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Pickup truck article is good at dealing with the American-centric nature of the market class, without the claim that the vehicle grouping is unique to one location and place of manufacture.PLawrence99cx (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Market classification - not location of factory

message: This article says the personal luxury car began in 1958.  However, the Packard Caribbean article calls that car a personal luxury car, and its production ended in 1956.  I don't know which is right, but I can't see how they could both be right.  49.198.51.54 (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for identifying the discrepancy in the description of the Packard Caribbean. The classification of "personal luxury car" had not come to use at the time of the Caribbean's production. The article has been updated with citations as to the positioning of the Caribbean in the marketplace at that time. Cheers! CZmarlin (talk) 03:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory 

message: I need kit for right and left back window assembly don't raise up and right front door assembly electric power windows need the electric motors also probably damaged I want all new parts if you have them 2603:8080:8202:FBE5:57:BCBC:EF64:986 (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1993 Lebanon convertible 3.1 engine