Template talk:Expand article

message: I created this template because:
*The  template is a great tool, but it needs the help! It's currently overused, and :Category:Articles to be expanded is massively backlogged. One reason for the mess: a request is easy to make but can be hard to act upon. Even if the request is for specific information, there is no guarantee that a reliable source can be found with that information. The new  template, on the other hand, has narrow criteria for use, makes the avenue of improvement obvious, and is crystal-clear about when it should be naturally removed.
*I've learned that I'm better at researching than writing. Probably I'm not alone, and probably there are also editors with the reverse talents. This template should aid both groups by giving us an easy outlet for all the sources we find and them ready-made lists of useful material.
*If the template is widely used, then that means that lots of people are finding new sources. Therefore it promotes a culture of curiosity and awareness of all the pieces of human knowledge we still have the opportunity to add. Whenever you read something interesting that isn't reflected in the relevant Wikipedia article, here's a mechanism by which you can suggest it to everyone else. I hope people get in the habit of doing just that!
Thoughts, anyone? Melchoir 08:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I don't know how much I'd use the template, it is a very intriguing idea.  --  Zanimum 14:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this template could be useful

message: I like the idea, but isn't this overlapping with the ) template and to-do lists? —Gennaro Prota•Talk 15:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it does overlap a bit, but I hope this template is simpler to use. After all,  can be used for just about anything. This template, much like , will make it easier to target and fix up articles with a specific need. It also has the distinction of being more visible in the article itself; whether that's a benefit or not is less clear... Melchoir 18:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this different from ? Might this not be better covered by addnig a parameter to that? (Radiant) 11:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  But&hellip; 

message: There's a proposal at the new WP:Further reading that would make this template pointless. Tijfo098 (talk) 04:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads-up 

message: As the  template has been deprecated, it may be fortuitous to enhance this template to make it possible for people to include specific suggestions within it. This would add more options and increase its utility.
In the template's current documentation, there's a segment that reads, ..."However a bunch of people who did not understand the hereinbefore purpose !voted to merge the template "Incomplete" here. Therefore if you don't want to explicitly point to the "Further reading" section, you will need to set "further = no"." This may be confusing to editors.
It's already possible for users to include specific suggestions, but this is currently not included in the Expand further template's documentation. Also, users have to begin their sentence with the text "article." and omit a period at the sentence's end for the text to render properly. Here's example text of including suggestions:
:
Which creates:
Just some ideas for consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps update this template 

message: I just noticed a stub page that uses "expand article" too. are we repeating the mistakes of "expand"? What is exactly the difference of "expand" tag and this one? -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, we are repeating the same mistakes again. Don't know why this one wasn't deleted. There is barely a difference between "expand" and this one. Garion96 (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand article and stubs 

message: Include Category:Expand Article so tht every article including the template will be out into that category for people with more information  on that topic to expand the article 109.151.163.1 (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We already have two categories, Category:Articles to be expanded with sources and Category:Articles to be expanded, as stated in the documentation. Debresser (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Couldn't we create another template with the title template:expand  template and another template called template:expand page and bring back template:expand article 90.211.52.178 (talk) 12:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Why?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:expand article