lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dennis Hwang

message: The link to the Korean news article is dead. -Jaardon 12:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Dead 

message: Before anyone considers sending this article to Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion, which might seem appropriate, it should be noted that Google is linking to (using?) it.  See for yourself Jason McHuff (talk) 05:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is dead (and Google linking to something doesn't make it automatically keepable, anyway). 86.164.23.31 (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Google's linking here

message: Not sure why Piet Mondrian's birthday is thought to be an unusual event. Most people have birthdays rгандон  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.73.104.143 (talk) 14:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual? 

message: The Google calibration team is always my favorite ..   Daisyswagg (talk) 01:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks again 

message: The_blackgamer auch the_blackgame360 genannt stinkt  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.34.70.247 (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The_blackgamer 
Category talk:Nikola Tesla

message: I don't see the point of having a separate category "Nikola Tesla". The sub-categories are now just a mish-mash of things, without any explanation. Also it seems out of place to have the "Nikola Tesla"-category solely as a sub-category inside the "perpetual motion"-category; like Tesla can be summarized like that. Appears as an attempt to marginalize or even defame his work.FrankRadioSpecial (talk) 12:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with main article on Tesla
Talk:Indirect effect

message: Indirect effect is not as rigid as the original author implies - it does not override domestive law, it simply places an burden upon domestic courts to interpret statutes in line with the directive.  Certainly, where there is a direct conflict between EC Law and domestic law, EC law is supreme - the supremacy principle - however this principle has its roots in direct effect.  Supremacy is only an issue when a measure is directly effective - this is because it is the claimant who will be relying on the EC law.  In the case of directives the claimant cannot rely on the directive being able to override domestic law since the claimant will not be able to resort to the directive to further their case.
Supremacy - which does override domestic law - is a consequence of direct effect.
Also - the seciton on IE and individuals should perhaps relate how IE is a solution to the problem faced by directives and HDE.  The text in the article would be better placed in the direct effect article.  --Heatley 18:45, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
I Edited the introduction to make it in line with what I belive to be the core of indirect effect. Will.S  20:23 11.03.06 2006
:I totally agree. This article has got indirect effect completely arse-ways. Ratti has nothing to do indirect effect. But why didn't either of you change the article when it was so obviously wrong?? — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 14:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Hamhung

message: The section on the city's economy does not read as neutral: 
"While prior to liberation of Korea Hamhung had an extremely backwards economy due to the destructive actions of the Japanese, the city was rapidly developed afterwards, with new industrial districts being built and being broken free of colonial acquisitions of material. Much of the heavy industrial equipment used in other cities are built in Hamhung, and its production contributes to the monumental construction of buildings under projects launched by the Workers' Party." Aliza250 (talk) 02:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy: Neutral tone?
Talk:Gyebaek

message: Кьебэк всегда заботился о своей жене и детьми и о своих друзей.Также он был милосердным и не убивал молодого война даже если он жестокий враг 178.90.224.234 (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Кьебэк был великим генералом древнего государства пэкче.Умер 660 года 21 августа при последней битве пэкче с силла и тан.У пэкче было более 55000 войнов.Но Кьебэк взял только 5000 войнов а остальных войнов отправил на битву с таном.К сожалению Кьебэк умер при этой битве.Он женился на слугу принцессы.При подготовки к войну Кьебэк убил свою жену и детей.Хотя это не помогло чтобы победить огромную армию силлы с 5000 войнамии
Talk:Extended Unix Code

message: which of the codes specified in ISO-2022-JP is byteshifted in EUC-JP? Plugwash 22:11, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with the move - it appears that it is capitalised in most references.  violet/riga (t) 19:31, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Which code

message: This is stated in the EUC-CN section, which seems quite wrong, though I'd like someone to confirm this - EUC-CN is a character encoding that encodes the GB18030 character set.  Unfortunately the character set link redirects to the character encoding, which may explain the confusion.  
Quite a few Wikipedia pages in this area appear to be confused (and confusing), although some of the Unicode pages are better on distinction between character set, character encoding and character repertoire.
Also, why is this page using the Korean template when it's not just about Korean encodings?
---
I agree - GB18030 is actually a Unicode Transformation Format (UTF), i.e. a Unicode encoding, and I've never heard of anyone using EUC-CN as an encoding of GB18030.  This may well happen in some cases, but it can't be correct to say this is common, so will make edit to state it is not so common.
Richard Donkin 06:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "EUC-CN is a form of GB18030" and character set vs. encoding confusion 

message: > KS X 1003 (formerly KS C 5636)/ISO 646:KR/US-ASCII.
The encoding KS X 1003 is indeed also known as ISO 646-KR, but this encoding is not US-ASCII. US-ASCII has a backslash character in it, whereas KS X 1003 has the won sign (₩) in its place.
Which encoding is it supposed to be? 58.173.133.147 (talk) 12:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous description of EUC-KR 

message: The link http://kikaku.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/2-4.htm tells me on 26 Nov that the web site is not available.
www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp is working and provides the link
https://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/itscj_english/iso-ir/ISO-IR.pdf
to a file named
ISO/IEC International Register of Coded Character Sets to be Used With Escape Sequences
Section 2.4. Multi byte graphic character sets  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.160.157 (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and now it's at https://itscj.ipsj.or.jp/english/vbcqpr00000004qn-att/ISO-IR.pdf.  Updated. Guy Harris (talk) 00:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Register of Coded Character Sets
Talk:Dojo

message: I added Aikikai Hombu to the small list of dojos, since I see the Aikikai Hombu as at least as significant as the Yoshinkan hombu - but really, I think either you don't need to mention specific hombus at all or we could mention Kodokan and Shotokan in the text rather than in a list, since these two really are famous dojos. // Habj 07:26, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of dojos 

message: Hi,
I replaced some text that was removed by an anonymous user without any explanation. --Slashme 06:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced text 

message: Is there a picture of the sasaran? Angie Y. (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pencak Silat ''sasaran''

message: Hello, I can't see any interwikis whereas wikidata seems OK . When I am looking :fr:Dojo all is ok (and English link present). Who can explain/fix that ? Thanks --Sisyph (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwikis 

message: The previously deleted alternative use of Dōjō as an environment for practising Zen Buddhism has been restored. This is a cited use, so please do not delete it again with discussing it here and reaching agreement. Davidjcmorris  Talk  02:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dōjō in Zen Buddhism
Talk:Carol Stream, Illinois

message: In 2006 some text was added. It was a copy paste from this site The original editor included a reference, which was inexplicably removed in 2008.
I've removed the text due to copyright considerations, but this leaves a gap in the history. An editor might wish to review the source, and add back some of the information in their own words.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal explanation 
Talk:Cheryl Jacques

message: Removed the following info because her old Mass Senate bio didn't list: 
Before that she was Assistant District Attorney in Middlesex County and Assistant Attorney General of the state.
If anyone can provide a source to confirm, then add back. Autiger 19:37, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned in her Human Rights Campaign biography.  --Gerald Farinas 17:33, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I missed it there; thanks. Autiger 19:04, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ch'oe Yŏng

message: I have changed Choi to Choe to match the title. Was that a good idea? Casper Mercer 21:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thank you.  -- Visviva 09:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Category talk:Units of measurement

message: I create a new entry Historical weights and measures (Roman System)
: I cannot see the value of this unless the entire Historical weights and measures is reorganized. Egil 12:32, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now split Historical weights and measures into Ancient weights and measures and Medieval weights and measures Ian Cairns 17:24, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  2004
Talk:Pink-headed duck

message: Birdlife which is the official red list authority for birds for IUCN has categorised it as CR per this link available in the article. Am reversing this edit hence. prashanthns (talk) 10:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IUCN category CR or EX?

message: which authority put this species into the genus Netta? Because both Sibley & Monroe and ITIS still regarded it as Rhodonessa? --Melly42 14:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I suggest that it goes back into Rhodonessa. The basis for putting it into Netta is Livezey (1998), but the methodology is not very good. Dysmorodrepanis 04:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Netta or Rhodonessa?
Talk:Bamboo curtain

message: I'm removing 90% of this article if no sources appear soon. I mean, wow. Even stuff on the talk page is just ridiculous without evidence (Majahadeen wearing Chinese sneakers?)--Mista-X (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsource

message: What is it supposed to show us? Alastairward (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: The article lead said that it was "a Cold War" euphemism, but failed to mention of what, only followed by "for the political demarcation between the Communist and non-communist states of East Asia". Because I'm not a native speaker of English, so I went to :wikt:euphemism and see what the big word exactly means: (1) The use of a word or phrase to replace another with one that is considered less offensive, blunt or vulgar than the word or phrase it replaces. (2) A word or phrase that is used to replace another in this way.
So, it replaces something offensive, blunt, or vulgar, but what does it replaced? "The border between communist and non-communist states"? "Communist"? Can we change the wording? Bennylin (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euphemism of what? 
Talk:Abyssin

message: Abyssin was listed on VfD on 22-AUG-2004. What follows is that discussion:
From the article, one would never know that it's from Star Wars. I think it's non-notable. Also would apply to Aqualish et al. Yelyos 20:13, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
*Comes from List of Star Wars races, wich is, unfortunately, just a list. Suggest an umbrella article be written: Minor races in Star Wars, and merge and redirect this, and all the other little one-paragraph stubs, into that article. Kevyn 21:09, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Anarchists (film)

message: , do you have any additional sourcing for this topic? If not, do you have a suggestion for a merge target, if you want to mention it as the first Korean–Chinese co-production? czar 03:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It looks like the film is primarily known as the first modern Korean–Chinese co-production, so I pulled a few sources and expanded at Cinema of South Korea#Current. If there is no other coverage of the film (e.g., reviews) or any other legacy/impact, I think it might be sufficiently covered in that section. czar 04:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already an English-language review from Variety cited in the article.  Reviews and other reports in Korean are very likely to exist but would require someone with facility in Korean language and sources. In my opinion the film meets the notability standards commonly used here for foreign language films. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
Talk:Michael Andrews (musician)

message: I'd like to disagree with you there.  Roland Orzabal did it.  At least my tracklist says so.  --TIB (talk) 21:25, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
: See the #2 on the track-listing of The Hurting, which is a Tears for Fears album. Cparker 16:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  WAY too much Mad World information.  Some of this should be moved to it's (Mad World's) article because a lot of the information is both, imo, a) fancruft and b) not appropriate to include in Andrews' article.  Also, as his website URL indicates, he's known to use the name "Elgin Parks" (as a stage-alias-- such as in the band Greyboy Allstars).  This should be mentioned.  I don't wikiedit much anymore, only wikicriticize (for neutrality and encyclopaedic formatting).  I didn't go ahead and make the edit because a) I know pretty much nothing about Andrews and b) I don't know much about Mad World's history either.  Mad World article contains a lot of this song chart information, and a bit about Andrews, so let's mention he helped spawn the cover, link to the T for F Mad World article, and move onto further fixes? ---- edit: so it's ~~~~, not ---- to sign... ^_^ 71.36.147.119 (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mad World
Talk:Pah-wraith

message: Brian Kendig wrote: the correct spelling is "Pagh", not "Pah" - the 'g' is silent; would someone please also swap this page with its redirect?
Joy wrote: actually, no, it isn't. Pagh is the term for that inner thing that the Bajorans can feel by touching their ears, whereas these Pah Wraiths are something different. source: startrek.com and memoryalpha
Actually, the correct spelling is "Pagh", according to Ron Moore: http://trekweb.com/RonDMoore/RonDMoore-9.14.98.html 98.213.54.68 (talk) 05:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pah vs. Pagh

message: Absent any citation or reference I'd say this is Original Research
Zero sharp 10:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Similarities to SG-1

message: This sentence in the article is inaccurate:
  "Winn, who had abandoned her faith in the Prophets, returns to them and undergoes a change of heart, sacrificing her life in an attempt to stop Dukat"
Winn does not return to her faith. Moments before her supposed "sacrifice", in an attempt to gain personal power by embracing the Pah-wraith (in hopes that they would choose her as their Emissary), she has poisoned & attempted to kill Dukat in order to sacrifice him to the Pah-wraith to bring them back to power Then, over his (supposedly dead) body, she announces to the Pah-wraiths that "I am yours, now and forever."  It is only after the Pah-wraiths ignore her pleas, blast her into a wall, and resurrect Dukat, and only after an angry, powerful Dukat ridicules her and announces that the Pah-wraith plan to set the entire universe on fire ("to burn for all eternity") that she realizes she is in big trouble. When Dukat seems to defeat Sisko, Winn attempts to stop Dukat with the same book she used to summon the Pah-wraith.  But that does not mark any return to her faith in the Prophets, merely an attempt at self-preservation. Dukat easily takes the book from her hands and burns her to death.  The character of Winn is always motivated by a quest for personal power and glory.  When she fails to get it from the Prophets, she switches sides to the Pa-wraith.  Her last ditch attempt to use the book to stop Dukat is merely another selfish attempt to stay alive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.69.110 (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Winn's end
Talk:Scottish Deerhound

message: Hi there. The source is available for full viewing on google books. The source describes the dog as being a "stag hound" (is there a difference?) of Scottish origin. The animal illustrated certainly does conform to the deerhound look. I'm not an expert on the matter though, as I came across it mostly for my project in re-writing the spotted hyena page.Mariomassone (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  deerhound 

message: The acclaimed photo that has lead this page for the last two years has been temporarily removed for copyright reasons. 
Permission to reproduce that photo is actively being pursued, please be patient.--Richard Hawkins (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main photo 

message: The height & weight of this breed need to be added to the article.
Gatorgirl7563 (talk) 11:53, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height & Weight are needed
Talk:List of controversial new religious movements

message: From WP:RfD:
* List of controversial new religious movements → List of groups referred to as cults by some media outlets -- POV - not relevant to article content --ZappaZ  04:55, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I have yet to see a movement that falls within the category of "New Religious Movement" that is not labelled by one or another as being either a cult or being controversial. I see both these distinctions the result of a failed attempt to cloack a negative POV within a dubious taxonomy. -- ≈ jossi ≈ 23:37, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
:Some NRMs are very controversial and some are not so controversial. E.g. ACIM of which Gary_D is an adherent is not very controversial but there is a group within ACIM that is controversial. Some of my friends became a member of that group. I have also written about NRMs without mentioning anything negative e.g. Swami Roberto because I couldn't find any substantial criticism, though I personally believe that he is either self deceived or a fraud. Andries 23:44, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: An irrelevant aside: Someone listed the ACIM article on Wikipedia:Cleanup#August 13 a while back, asking for inclusion of criticism; no action yet. In fact, there's really very little serious, pointed criticism floating around out there of ACIM itself (the Skeptic's Dictionary takes only a half-hearted swing at it, there's the usual Christian or two calling it demon inspired), probably because the book is too arcane and turgid for anyone to really bother with freaking out over it, LOL (in other words, going after this one is not very sexy). The group Andries is referring to, on the other hand, now there's sexy controversy! Andries, you should E-mail me sometime and tell me more of what happened to your friends. I know someone who achieved a sort of ACIM satori (see responsibility assumption) at the moment the leader of that group punched him in the nose! --Gary D 09:10, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Separation of mixtures

message: It is important to clarify that mixtures can be composed of elements and/or compounds. Therefore, when the definition says "separation of the elements of a mixture" it doesn´t really limit the separation to mixtures of only elements. -Anon
:You make a good point, I've clarified the wording. However if you note any other errors or omissions like this, you don't need to make a comment on the talk page, you can just edit the page yourself :-) This is a wiki. Theresa Knott 22:38, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Lavochkin

message: I changed "aircraft manufacturer" to "design bureau". I am not sure that there was no manufacturer (production plant) named after Lavochkin. But note that Soviet economic infrustructure was pretty different from the Western (namely market-type). A design bureau and a manufacturer usually were not a single unit or affiliated companies. Despite the hot competition between design teams (like those of Lavochkin, Mikoyan and so forth), the producers were not controlled by those teams, but by party bureaucracy. So I doubt that Lavochkin's bureau was also producing the planes.
I'm not entirely sure about the 100-series Lavochkin designations. Some sources indicate that these aircraft were not officially assigned La- monikers and were simply referred to as "fighter number ###" or "###". I've done my best to redirect prototypes to production version pages (e.g. La-130, La-132 to La-9). Emt147 08:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Most of "La-" (as well as all those "MiG-", "Su-", etc) prefixes were assigned at the moment of "entering service". Well, sometimes development numbers were retained (as Tu-95 for [ANT-]95). --jno 10:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: * Oppose. We keep bureaus and the founders of those bureaus separate in other cases. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 03:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge effort 

message: I have concerns about a conflict of interest with recent edits from . Comments like "the editing is officially approved by the management of Lavochkin Association"  show a lack of understanding that management at Lavochkin would be a primary source, and of considerably less value than secondary sources. That doesn't mean all changes are wrong. I've reinstated a few details from the edit, suspecting they might survive unsourced, but unchallenged. Much of the rest reads like an advertisement, and some sourced content is removed which may be more in the company's interest than Wikipedia's. Further edits should be done in small stages, and allow for input from all interested editors here on the talk page. Willondon (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI edits