lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Single-vehicle crash

message: I'm not sure the image portrays a single-vehicle accident, it looks like the car has been T-boned to the curb by another, unseen vehicle. --Hooperbloob (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Photo removed.--Triskele Jim 16:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad photo

message: Most single-vehicle crashes are run-offs. I suggest moving the content of that article here.--Triskele Jim (talk) 17:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Given that the article includes suicides as a type of incident, it seems odd that the article title includes the word "accident". Thoughts? Vectro (talk) 15:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I made this change today. Vectro (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Single-vehicle collision or Single-vehicle crash 

message: Quoting from the article: Crashes with only one motor-vehicle where bystanders (such as pedestrians or bicyclists) are injured are not typically called "single-vehicle," although technically the term does apply. So what term is preferred?
Our best article on the topic currently seems to be Pedestrian safety through vehicle design (which is not the most concise title possible). --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crashes involving bystanders
Talk:Hydrolock

message: The external link is broken  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.168.6.143 (talk) 21:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link

message: The article is as clear as daylight, it needs no real verification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.249 (talk) 13:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: No need for verification

message: This article may lead the uninformed reader to believe that hydrostatic lock is an undesirable phenomenon.  Hydrostatic lock is useful in machine design and should be so noted.
:38.69.12.5 (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading article
Talk:Fishtailing

message: "The instinctive response (to steer right if the rear swings left or vice versa) will worsen the spin." Now, I'll admit that I haven't tried, but could any sane person really respond as the article says? "Hmm.. I want to go right *there*, but the car is pointing too far too the right... How do I fix this?!? I know, let's turn RIGHT!!" ????? I mean, OK, I haven't looked into any research on the subject, but seriously?!? Even three-year-olds know how to work a steering wheel, I can't see how an adult with a drivers license could possibly "instinctively" respond by trying to make the skid worse... Gah, this is just becoming a rant, but, dayum it seems stupid. 94.191.144.28 (talk) 18:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hah, that's the same reason I clicked the discussion page, it seems weird to me too. I instinctively turn the correct way when it happens, and I don't understand why you would do it the other way either. Raduberinde (talk) 00:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Instinctive response??

message: "This was illustrated in the landmark NSW case of R v Harmon (2014) in the High Court of Australia before a full bench."
Not even google returns anything about this "landmark" case - is there a typo or something? --144.132.168.61 (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  nonexistent court case?
Talk:International Car of the Year

message: I wonder by curiosity why ICOTY could have a conflict of interest?  And for reference, since well knowns car blogs like Edmunds and Autoblog mention them, I think they could be a reference. Sd-100 (talk • contribs) 19:31, November 28 2007 EST  —Preceding comment was added at 00:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Green Car of the Year

message: An A6 and a 3 series BMW among the 2014 finalists! Both spell "Waste fuel for fun now"! That's going to cost most of the credibility of the award, unless there have been no more applicants than those finalists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.0.26.125 (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Cars Among Finalists?! 
Talk:High wheeler

message: Should the phrase "High Wheeler" really be capitalized? If so, why? If not, how about we move the article to the title "high wheeler"? -- Infrogmation 17:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it is a proper name or trademark, it should not be capitalized. (The first letter of article titles are capitalized automatically by Wikipedia software.) -- Infrogmation 02:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How does one link High wheeler to :de:Highwheeler? Peter Horn User talk 21:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I managed to have done that, it took a while to take effect. Peter Horn User talk 21:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it did not work yet. Peter Horn User talk 21:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever you did seems to be working now - I can see a 'Deutsch' link in the left sidebar and it takes me to the correct German page.  Stepho  talk  15:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does one link High wheeler
Talk:Close-coupled sedan

message: I propose that Close-coupled sedan be merged into sedan, as per some other types of sedans that are covered there. The reasons for the merger are that the content is more likely to be improved when it is part of the main sedan article, and it helps prevent WP:FORK. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 11:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Mini sport utility vehicle

message: I have rated this article as "start" quality and "mid" importance.
I have rated it as "start" quality for the following reasons:
*References  There aren't any.  Detailed specifications of the mini SUV class are put forward apparently out of thin air, as are references to the history of the mini SUV.  References to the sources of these, especially of the specifications, are needed.
*Neutral point of view  The article appears to condemn modern mini SUVs as being fashion statements with no real off-road value.  While this may be a valid opinion, it is still an opinion and creates a biased tone in the article.  Valid, reliable, and documented facts are likely to be available to show the capabilities of both older and newer mini SUVs.  
*Grammar  Some work is needed on the grammar of the article.  The most glaring (and probably most easily fixed) grammatical error is the incorrect verb usage in this line: "They have substitute off-road cosmetic features..."
*Content  A more comprehensive history of the mini SUV might be in order.  This would probably include the Willys MB from World War II, the Citroën Méhari, the Mini Moke, and other historic vehicles that would fit the category.
I have rated it as "mid" importance because, although there may be a significant market in the West for the type, I am not sure how significant the market is, nor how significant it is worldwide.  I may have been conservative in that rating.  If anyone can make a  case for a "high" rating please state the case and make the appropriate changes.
I look forward to seeing the development of this article.
I would like to know who was the "smart" guy who invented this categories! You just mixed different kinds of cars in this so called "suv types"!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.189.224.249 (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the rating 

message: This article has long neglected, and doesn't even cite any sources.  If someone wants to reinstate the article, bring some, more than 1, reliable and reputable source with it.  Bookster451 (talk) 02:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added 1 ref, but the term Mini SUV is far from well recognised. It really should be merged with Compact SUV, and Mini SUV mentioned there as a potential sub-set of the classification. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 11:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the term is not well recognised (most of the examples are listed as subcompact crossovers), and that the article should be merged with Compact SUV. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect, April 2012
Talk:Leisure activity vehicle

message: "Van" isn't used to mean a passenger vehicle in British English. I'm not sure what to use here, since as mentioned "mini MPV" is something different. 86.132.138.84 04:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van? 

message: Given that a Leisure Activity Vehicle is a type of minivan, I propose to move it into the minivan article. The reason is to give the reader more context and hopefully improve the referencing of this (currently unsourced) article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 06:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: This article was merged to minvan - but then that entire section from Minivan was later deleted now the redirect makes no sense as the anchor title no longer exists and no details about this type of vehicle are on that page. OrlandoCityFan (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I point out that the statement made in the history by user Onel5969 - that I didn't address the issues raised is not correct. I added to the talk page above, explained that the merged text had been removed from the main article without justification and that the structure for this article is similar to the other sub-types of mini-vans which have their own article. It was Onel5969 that didn't address my reasons for restoring the article. OrlandoCityFan (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring article
Talk:Crew cab

message: The 'Crew Cab' section is practically the same as Pickup truck#Crew cab and the 'Sport utility truck' is practically the same as Pickup truck#Sport utility truck. I would like to make this article into a simple redirect to Pickup truck#Crew cab and remove the links in Pickup truck#Crew cab and Pickup truck#Sport utility truck that point to here.  Stepho  (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: merge to Pickup truck
Talk:Mark of Excellence

message: My parents had a 1972 Chevrolet Caprice Wagon, and we never had the crack as described in the article, but this Olsonite Mfg. Co. manufactured crash-pad did seem to crack everywhere else, at both ends, at the speaker openings and adjacent to the speedo opening ...  I originally looked for this page, after it occurred to me that I had not seen those words "Mark of Excellence" since I was a teen ... and wondered when GM actually gave up on the idea of excellence...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobber100 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Payless Car Rental

message: The article, especially the "vehicles" section, read like they were written by a dissatisfied customer who decided to use Wikipedia to air their dispute ... I think there's some value in including material about the types of cars that Payless rents, but it needs to be done in a more neutral manner. V35322 (talk) 19:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Flat tire

message: Why on Earth does this article begin with the expression "in a motor vehicle"? Flats are profoundly more common on bicycles, which frequently use very thin-walled tyres.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmsg (talk • contribs) 16:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motor vehicle? 

message: What happens if a cyclist keeps on cycling with a flat tire?
Most sources simply recommend stopping and pushing - some suggest this would "destroy the tire and rims", but how? and why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.34.94 (talk) 12:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When the tyre is flat the rim will likely be pressing down on the sidewall of the deflated tyre, which will damage it if done for too long.  Alternatively the rim may be in direct contact with the road, which is widely held to be a Bad Thing.  Other hazards include reduced control over the bike's direction (front flat), the tyre coming off completely and jamming against the frame or fork, and falling off.  I did once manage the last 8 km of a winter 200 with a flat, but it's not an experience I'd care to repeat.  Also, bicycle punctures are actually caused by She Who Must Not Be Named, a.k.a. The P*nct*r* Fairy. Mr Larrington (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cycling with flat tires 

message: This article seems to have a large slant to an American point of view. While it is factually correct, informing me, a Briton, or indeed any other nationality that the American Automobile Association will change my tyres for me, is not really that relevant. Maybe the page could be reworked a bit, so that recovery services are in their own section, 'Many companies around the world offer recovery or tyre changes to their members *list examples by country*'
80.6.34.57 (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  American slant 

message: This article is written in how-to style.--Anon423 (talk) 23:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: One highly important preventative measure in avoiding a flat is to ensure your spare tire is properly inflated and in good, undamaged condition. How does one avoid a flat tyre by having a proper spare? It's like saying you won't get shot if you bring a proper first aid kit Llanorant (talk) 07:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: False

message: About this section:
Thin-walled tires, especially those used in road racing bicycles are particularly susceptible to puncture by road debris, such as thorns, and small pieces of glass that would not affect tires with more substantial tread.
I must say that is not true, even very false. Mountainbikers change their tire much more faster than road biker. Tubular, half tubulars are so well made, they dont puncture so easy, and i am sure citation from the text wasnt made by cycler. See Pariz-Roubaix race, check with flat tires. --PetarM (talk) 07:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrongness of Bicycle section

message: This article has been marked as how-to for over 10 years.  Is there anything to preserve or should it be sent to AFD? RJFJR (talk) 04:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marked as How-To for a decade
Talk:Service taxi

message: This does not describe service taxis as they work in Egypt. Service in Egypt follow fixed routes usually collecting all the passengers in one place and dropping them off together at the final destination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.72.94.163 (talk) 10:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The content of this article has now been merged into Share taxi as per the discussion on talk:Share taxi. PeterEastern (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Dry steering

message: I've been trying to look up actual facts and experiments on the effects dry steering has on a car. However, the entire internet is just full of people repeating hearsay and stuff they learned from their driving lessons. At least from Wikipedia, I would have expected actual facts or at the very least reputable sources.
I'm not knowledgeable enough about cars to write anything about the subject, but could someone please give exact sources for each of these (very diverse) supposed negative effects of dry steering? I.e., something different from hearsay or theoretical considerations?195.169.221.42 (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  All this information is unsupported by sources 

message: I'm just going to cn bomb this, every assertion needs an RS, the one in the article is apparently a collection of old wives tales if it is the source of this travesty. Greglocock (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody else could be bothered to sort it out i did. Enjoy. Greglocock (talk) 05:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rarely have i read so much drivel in one short article.
Talk:Caresto

message: This page needs citations and converting from a series of unconnected statements to a full article.
For instance I can find no evidence that Leif Tufvesson was in any way involved in the production of the Koenigsegg.
213.143.17.58 (talk) 13:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section on the "Hot Rod Jakob" is suspiciously similar to an article in a Volvo commercial insert in the Swedish evening paper Aftonbladet: http://www.aftonbladet.se/kampanj/volvo/article5140458.ab . Can't say which way the possible (probable, even?) plagiarism goes, though: Did Volvo/Aftonbladet copy the WP article, or is the WP article copied from the Volvo/Aftonbladet commercial? There is of course also the third possibility, that it isn't plagiarism because the Volvo/Aftonbladet copywriter is the one who put up his own text here too (with appropriate permissions from the probable copyright owners, his employers). But then that would be a violation of WP impartiality policies, wouldn't it?--CRConrad (talk) 18:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed all of it just to be safe, however it likely was copypasted straight from the web without permission. All the promotional language and tone was inappropriate for Wikipedia anyway. I see this kind of plagiarism all the time. -- œ™ 04:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible plagiarism - but which way? Or is it an impartiality-policy violation?
Talk:Wheelspin

message: Hello all,
I am reaching out to this talk page to ask for help on some revision ideas I have regarding the article. I am wanting to add some citations for some of the material and I want to organize the page by adding subheadings to break up the article into specific parts (I was thinking technical description, use in motorsports, systems that induce it, etc.). I also plan on adding more information and sources for any readers to use to do more research on the topic.
Are there any thoughts or ideas for me on where to start? Also I would appreciate it if some of you could review any revisions I make and help me to edit this article.
Thanks! BardAtTheRoundTable (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New revision ideas to the article. 

message: Hello,
I just wanted to let you guys know that I added more information to the definition and I changed a little bit of spelling in the first sentence. If you have any advice or questions then let me know.
Thanks! BardAtTheRoundTable (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed definition 

message: Hello,
In this edit I have made big changes, namely I added headings and sub-headings to organize the article. I also added new information about oversteer and how wheelspin causes it. I rearranged some existing information to flow better and be organized in the article. I added a new citation for the oversteer information so that more research can be done if the reader chooses to do so. Finally, I have added a prevention section but I have not added information to it yet, I have information to put in there but I am going to play around with it to see how I want to write it in the article. If you have any suggestions or ideas then feel free to let me know and I will respond as quickly as I can.
Thanks! BardAtTheRoundTable (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Sections and New Information 

message: Hello,
In this edit I have added the information I was talking about in the prevention section about traction control and driving techniques. I also added information about understeer and more citations for the information that I have provided in this new edit. If you have any suggestions or questions then feel free to ask.
Thanks! BardAtTheRoundTable (talk) 01:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Information to Prevention
Talk:Pre-production car

message: A car that is commited to be produced, how can one call it ?.(i.e. Cadillac Converj).   --Sennaciulo (talk) 14:35, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You start with a styling buck, and then you have engineering mules or engineering prototypes, usually based on a current car, then you have integration or verification prototypes which are the correct shape and have the new systems fitted, then you have confirmation prototypes or pre production prototypes and then you have accelerated build and then J1 (production) cars. Roughly speaking. The terminology is different for each car company, where i work we have about 8 phases of prototype build. Greglocock (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-production car
Talk:Full-size van

message: I propose that Full-size van be merged into van. The topic fits nicely within the scope of the van article, and the merger will help prevent WP:FORK. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Full-size Ford

message: I think there needs to be more made about how the line of full-size Ford and the full-size flagship Mercury have a shared past right from the beginning from 1938-1939, as the first Mercury began life as a re-branded full-size Ford.  Through the years, they have shared a common platform and engineering, and today, with the removal of Crown Victorias from retail sales, the Grand Marquis is, for all intents and purposes, the last of the full-size Fords (if defined by body on frame construction, RWD, and V8 engine).  Even since 1980, the Panther platform for full-size Fords has unified Lincolns with Fords and Mercurys; no longer does the Town Car (formerly Continental or Mark VII) have its own platform or separate engineering.  --SteveCof00 (talk) 22:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of Mercury
Talk:Forecar

message: thumb|upright=1.1|FMR Mokuli, a typical "Lästenroller" or utility motorcycle
In the '50s, the Germans had vehicles called "Lästenrollern" (the "n" at the end indicating plural).  The photo in this section is an example.  Would these be considered "forecars"? Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 18:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would a Lästenroller be a forecar?
Talk:Points of View (TV programme)

message: Is this jut a spelling error or typo?
"Discrete" means "separate" (grossly simple definition). "Discreet" means "subtle".
Perhaps discretely is intended but there is no discrete section of the prog or anything is there?
Possibly easiest just to cut the word entirely. SimonTrew (talk) 08:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  discretely -> discreetly 

message: The article is a bit too jokey and informal and it doesn't seem to have any references at all. Paul S (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Given the uncontroversial statement that it was dropped for eight years, would it not be more sensible for the sidebar to say "1961-71, 1979-present"? Harfarhs (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of run
Talk:Production leveling

message: See Heijunka. Jayen466 22:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Come on guys. i've tried hard to filter in muri and mura into these lean pages and you just put muda back up there as the aim of Lean/TPS. levelling surely by definition reduces unevenness - and sure that then reduces muda as a consequence. I propose the opening "muda" becomes "mura". Facius (talk) 23:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Jayen466 23:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  muda is not all 

message: Is businessknowledgesource.com a reliable reference? --Wilhkar (talk) 17:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 1 

message: somebody should put this into proper english? it´s barely readable  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.113.86.94 (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A123 Hymotion

message: Hymotion page now gone. Cannot find reference to hymotion at all on A123systems site. Ariakalea (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I found some archived copies of their old website and also added that the current website is no longer available.  Stepho  talk  11:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Takahiro Arai

message: This should probably have some disambiguation as the Hanshin Tigers baseball player points to this article. 
Also, all edits up until the end of 2009 were about the baseball player but were then overwritten for a completely different person.
Why was a perfectly okay article deleted? The other language links and categories belong to the baseball player and the Mangaka. --Hydenobuyuki (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga Artist vs. Baseball Player