Talk:Jeffrey Peterson

message: Should we consider adding a bio infobox to this article? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 11:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio infobox 

message: This article doesn't read as an encyclopedic article. Looks like the guy wrote it himself in a self-promotional manner. Besides, I'm a hispanic myself, I've been on the Internet since 1994 and I've never heard of quepasa.com in my entire life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Retinoblastoma (talk • contribs) 21:20, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic format 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Jeffrey Peterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113101908/http://www.thestreet.com/_tscs/markets/dumbestgm/10162761_3.html to http://www.thestreet.com/_tscs/markets/dumbestgm/10162761_3.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717044852/http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/2000/5/26/1999_media_markets_report_clicking_online.htm to http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/2000/5/26/1999_media_markets_report_clicking_online.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130115171525/http://phoenix.gov/budget/2006bonds/index.html to http://phoenix.gov/budget/2006bonds/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100511050152/http://www.maricopa.gov/assessor/ParcelApplication/Default.aspx to http://www.maricopa.gov/Assessor/ParcelApplication/Default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717044915/http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/2005/9/21/jlo_by_jennifer_lopez_and_quepasa.htm to http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/2005/9/21/jlo_by_jennifer_lopez_and_quepasa.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jeffrey Peterson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615085533/http://www.re.state.az.us/flashpage.html to http://www.re.state.az.us/flashpage.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110621064206/http://www.quepasa.com/ to http://www.quepasa.com/
*Added  tag to http://www.aboutsmartmoney.net/stockwatch/index.cfm?story=199903303
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050410204801/http://www.baquia.com/com/legacy/10195.html to http://www.baquia.com/com/legacy/10195.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927224204/http://www.aol.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=11081 to http://www.aol.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=11081
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Research is leading to signs of significant notability in this article. The article has seen increased attention and possible attacks in recent weeks. Someone is trying to shame this entrepreneur. The aggressively worded paragraph that has been pasted two or three times into different parts of the article distracts from the readability of what is clearly a notable article. The entrepreneur appears to have tens or possibly hundreds of lawsuits either for or against him in his history. If the information that has recently been pasted in the heading about one litigation matter is partially or completely correct, it needs to be fact checked, placed under an appropriate heading as is seen with entrepreneur biographies on Wikipedia and reworded in a neutral fashion in Wiki-voice:
*WP:WikiVoice at WP:NPOV: "Avoid stating opinions as facts. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in Wikipedia's voice. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IlseBecker7 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  July, 2018 edits and reverts; notability 

message: A Page Protection Request has been submitted to Wikipedia admins. An update, fact check and recent information edit was done to this Wikipedia page for Jeffrey Peterson after we heard a lengthy biographical segment and news story about this entrepreneur on Sirius XM Radio in July. The subject personality is a significant figure in the history of technology companies and is possibly the creator of the first social network to trade on a Stock Exchange in the USA (See: Quepasa). I have been following developments in this story since then. The entrepreneur is involved in contentious defamation of character litigation against an influential political group consisting of past business partners. Since learning about it, I have have noticed the Wikipedia page being attacked and reverted numerous times over a span of the past few months. Attacks and vandalism have been from IP addresses and unregistered users. I previously commented on this talk page to bring attention to the attacks. Someone or some group of what appear to be highly charged adversaries of the entrepreneur have been trying to paste the disputed newspaper article itself in to the Jeffrey Peterson Wikipedia article at periodic intervals in an aggressive way (see the edits on the article for examples). As with many Wikipedia articles, Jeffrey Peterson appears as one of the first results in Google searches on the entrepreneur's full name so it might be a good idea to exercise caution in this case. The material being repeatedly pasted in to the article in an aggressive way and the existence of a dispute between business partners involving claims of libel and defamation does seem to fit Wikipedia's cautions regarding contentious material about living persons. Consider this a good faith 'heads up' about a situation that might pose a problem. A semi protected status is probably justified, given what seems to be a potentially volatile legal situation relating to the newspaper article published about this entrepreneur in December of 2017 the entrepreneur is now claiming is libelous; that article is apparently the source of the same information being repeatedly pasted in to this article. There are stories out there in the press right now about some of this if you Google his name. Thank you. IlseBecker7 (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but we don't protect pages preemptively. Damage to the article must actually be occurring, and that's not happening right now. The article is on my watch-list. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  October, 2018 Page Protection Request resulting from more attempted attacks