Talk:Face of the Screaming Werewolf

message: So does Face of the Screaming Werewolf actually state its release date in the book? Or just a year? Looking at the filmography page of the book, it only states a year. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I namely ask, as this book states its original release date as being in November 1963 in on page 379. (source). Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

text: How do you know its a typo? The date is quite specific. its not like pressing the wrong number on the keyboard. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, where's your source to when Warren was editing the film? It does not seem to add up as its not in the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

text: First of all, do not claim things "Warren created the 2 hybrid films (Face of the Screaming Werewolf and Curse of the Stone Hand) in late 1964 (that's when he did the actual editing, etc.)" if you can not back this up. Its edits like these despite being done in good faith, are not really acceptable. Don't assume film history if you have nothing to back it up with. Secondly, I've looked at that page in the Werewolf filmography and am not really finding this release date. If you want me to look at things, You can link it to show me. Its not really clear what the situation is here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

text: I saw that page. There is no indication in that book what those years stand for, so we can't assume its a release date because the book doesn't state this. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

text: "becoming" another film does not mean it was released then. Like, he may be mixing it up, but how do you know for sure? Your other sources are less specific, so I'm somewhat troubled by it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

text: What are these sources? You've shown me a few books with little proof outside a year. I'll ask you again. I won't question your competency if you can answer it. Have you read, and understood MOS:FILM when it comes to films release dates? Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

text: I'm also not disagreeing that it was released as a double feature. Many films of the past were released as double bills, but there is nothing suggesting that 1963 year is wrong. It could have first been shown in that year, then shown years later as a double feature. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

text: Anyone is free to edit wikipedia. This includes removing edits that do not fall under out guidelines. I'm glad you (finally?) read MOS:FILM. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

text: As there has been no follow-up on this, I'm removing the year of release as it is not clear. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: By adding other sources here its not really making it clear what the release date is. You've listed several years above, but just tossing on additional sources is not a real way to clarify. What makes one source more valid than another ? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no follow-up on this, I'm removing the year of release as it is not clear. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Follow-up