Talk:Tiësto/Archive 1

message: Hello to any tiesto fans reading this page.  i've edited the page vigourously for grammar and information.  it lacked cohesion and i didn't think it really represented tiesto's quality as an artist, so as a huge fan and a good university writer i edited the page almost like it was new.  hopefully everyone likes it! --154.5.80.90 07:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Newly Edited Article

message: Could anyone tell me please who is the one that sings in Tiesto's melody A tear in the open? --Locke 23:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe he used a sample from some other source. I think it tells you where on the liner notes for the CD. If not there, I'll try to recall where. --Dragnilar 12:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who sings "A tear in the open"?

message: I removed Forbidden Paradise 1,2,8-11 from the discography. The reason being was that Tiesto did not take part in the early and later part of the FP series. Those compilations were done by different DJs. For verification, please see this website: Guardian Angel/Basic BeatDragnilar 10:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unofficial Releases/Changes 8.12.06

message: According to wikipedia naming convention, this article should be named Tiesto and not Tijs Verwest. Any thoughts? Themindset 04:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Centrx→talk • 18:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be "Tiësto" (pronounced Tea-S-Toe like Dragnilar suggests above) instead of "Tiesto" (which should sound like Tea-Stoe if pronounced by a Dutch person). Besides correct pronounciation, Tiësto's albums and merchandise also feature an ë in his name. Rafert 00:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right. I'll ask for a move on Wikipedia:Requested_moves. -- Sander 13:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I personally think that since the name has the umlat above the E it should be pronounced Tea esh to but what do i know —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.243.223.130 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: I think the picture shown on the right side of the page should be changed, because it has a dvd-video symbol in the bottom right hand side of it, so it must be a part of a dvd cover and it means that's a copyrighted material. My 2 cents. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.112.214.196 (talk) 23:03, August 10, 2006 (UTC)
:It is, but the image is tagged with the appropriate tag. Click on it ;) Rafert 00:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe the picture of Tijs is copyrighted

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 22:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per consensus below. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support correct name writes with "ë".--Húsönd 17:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I removed the accusation 'the rumors created by Henry Williams [citation needed]', it was added by  of which this is the only contribution. Tinus 23:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Death hoax

message: The commercial trance blurb in the beginning is strange...
What is it?
The Ronin 18:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Commercial trance is trance music that tends to have a large commercial following (E.G. Tiësto, Lasgo, Cascada, Oakenfold, etc.) 24.13.93.171 19:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is Commercial Trance?

message: The Career section looks a little haphazard IMO. It doesn't read very smoothly and it looks like people have just been tacking on information as it arises on his official site. I think it could be cleaned up so that it could read in a more conventional manner. Anyone agree? --Dragnilar 01:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Career Section Looks Messy? (Flagged for Revision)

message: Can someone fill me in on what the dispute is? (Cloud02 18:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think there are some notes about it in #Newly_Edited_Article, but as I can tell things pointed out there are no longer true so it seems to me that that  can be removed. --Drundia 04:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If noone has any problem with it, I'm going to remove the NPOV tag. Tev 16:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute ?