lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Racer (Kennywood)

message: Any chance we can get a better layout diagram?  This one is just awful.  It looks like someone with tremor drew it hurriedly with a broken marker while riding an old bus with a bad suspension on a gravel pavement, and then scanned it into MS Paint without cleaning up the lines.  I'd redraw it myself, but I honestly can't tell from the current diagram what the layout should really look like.  The best I could do would be a stylized version like the London Underground map.  A search of the web only produces photos of sections of track, not enough to reconstruct the layout.  Canonblack 12:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can describe how it works to you. BTW, I drew the diagram, and I did it in Paint Shop Pro, not MS Paint. I just had a crappy mouse that wouldn't stay in one place. Anyways, here is the description:
One train is on the right side of the station and the other train is on the left. They go out of the station in a curve in opposite directions, meet up on the ground, and go up a long chain lift. The trains then go through a curved drop to the left, level out about 30 feet off the ground (this is a guess), go over the station (but under later track), do a banked turn until over the front of the station, do a right turn (over the level track), and go back to the station. Right before the station, the trains go into a straight tunnel. In the true layout, near the end, one train goes into the tunnel while the other crosses above the tunnel and does a drop afterwards (at least, this is how it was described to me). Sorry that the drawing's so bad. Wikifan42 19:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout diagram

message: The picture with the layout of the Racer is needs some fixing. I am not sure of the accuracy of this diagram.
Yeah its sad! i could do better in my sleep.
:I drew this, and it was only meant to help explain the way that the trains switch sides, not to be accurate. I don't know the entire layout of the coaster, and, in fact, I don't think anybody who hasn't been on it dozens of times and/or works for Kennywood knows the layout.  Oh, and I used a really cheap graphics tablet, so the lines are kind of wobbly. Wikifan42 13:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout Picture
Talk:Kumba (roller coaster)

message: Sweet!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.58.101 (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry for pinging you so much but I think this issue needs some immediate addressing. I've been talking with Duane (RCDB) today and he has informed that (to quote him), "On Wikipedia, delete any mention that B&M had anything to do with the Drachen Fire.  Geez, that is the oldest and falsest urban legend about roller coasters I think exists." I then asked him if the first paragraph in the history section of this article is also false and he responded, "It is false. I suggest removing it completely and when someone adds it back in (which they will) require them to site a reference." Now, you did include a reference to examiner.com but I have to now question how accurate that reference is after what Daune has said. It seems like it was written by some random person; plus isn't examiner.com blocked on Wikipedia?--Dom497 (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be happy to pull it. The information was in the article before I started the OpB&M improvement, so I hunted to find a reference for it. Themeparkgc  Talk  23:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

text: by the way, I love the pinging/notification system so keep doing it if you need to grab my attention. Themeparkgc  Talk  23:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Information 

message: Why did you remove the closing info? It was a legitimate article that confirmed the ride's closure date. Also the vandalism of the reception was not my doing. Marth The Hero King (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing Info 

message: I'm an employee at BGTB and have done work into finding facts to say to guest on the train. Things ive learned is how Kumba's roar is created from hollow tracks with no dampening sand in it, the fact its roar is about 100 decibels, and that it is B&M's first ever sitdown roller coaster. Can these edits be added to the page?  97.79.27.195 (talk) 03:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You are free to add information that is verifiable, meaning it can be located in a published sources that are considered reliable. See Verifiability and Reliable Sources. Another policy to be aware of is the No original research policy, which goes along with the other two. Editors cannot introduce facts, allegations, or ideas that are based on personal experience or personal research. Hope that helps. Consider visiting The Teahouse if you need additional help or have other questions. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am a park employee that works on the Serengetti Express and want to add info to the page.
Talk:Rougarou (roller coaster)

message: "Cedar Point renamed the coaster Mantis (but the sound the coaster makes as the cars roll, originally intended to sound like a wailing banshee, remains)."
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the second part of that sentence is completely unsourced. From what I've read of B&M coasters, several (including Kumba and Raptor) make a loud roaring-type noise due to the way the track is constructed. Kendall 03:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just as a note to everyone: I don't think we should move the page to "Rougarou (roller coaster" until Mantis closes in October.--Dom497 (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. FirstDrop87 (talk) 00:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We're just going to treat this the same as any of the Six Flags revamps of their wooden coasters, right? But with a name change of course. Hooky-i-vanisher (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rougarou 

message: Any reason we want to favor older Mantis photos over newer Rougarou photos? Seems like all the Mantis photos are now less informative as they no longer represent the ride in its current form. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 20:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, you're right. I overlooked the fact that the previous photo was of Mantis. I reverted it back. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mantis photos instead of Rougarou photos?
Talk:Matterhorn Bobsleds

message: (From "1990s–present" section:)
:The mountain–climber performers also returned after the refurbishment.
But they aren't mentioned till now. Will someone who knows more about them—when they began and formerly ended, what their performance entailed, etc.—please add something about them? – AndyFielding (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What climbers? 

message: The "Timeline" section is largely a repeat of the "History" section preceding it. The only real differences are the accounts of the two deaths that occurred on the attraction. I won't presume to make such a major change myself—but I suggest the death details be moved to their own section (as morose as that may seem—but this is being organized, guys) and "Timeline" be removed. – AndyFielding (talk) 13:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Timeline" redundancy
Talk:Music from the Penguin Cafe

message: I agree that from the sleeve notes "Zopf" seems much more likely to be a subgroup of PCO rather than the name of a suite or composition. But the eccentric layout of the back sleeve makes this still a bit ambiguous. Is there another source that confirms that Zopf is in fact a group?
Yes, the layout is indeed eccentric and ambiguous. But we can be sure that Zopf and Penguin Cafe Quartet are both groups as their members are listed on the sleeve.  Hence we can be almost sure that the tracks under heading “Zopf” are the ones performed by Zopf. Slightly less sure is the deduction (by elimination) that the *other* tracks are performed by PCQ. I agree that another source for any of this would be welcome.  DGMDGM (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zopf
Talk:Penguin Cafe Orchestra (album)

message: I note that a piece of music of this title is mentioned in the 1921 Yevgeny Zamyatin novel We. Is this where Jeffes et al got the title for their track? Grutness...wha? 15:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pythagoras's Trousers
Talk:Pyeong

message: Since the M-R spelling is p'yŏng, which is commonly written as "pyong," shouldn't both "pyong" and "p'yŏng" (and I supposed pyŏng) redirect to "pyeong"? Kushibo (talk) 07:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. — LlywelynII 02:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't there be a redirect for "pyong"?
Talk:Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge

message: I'd like to suggest that Fort Niobrara Wilderness be merged into this article.  The Wilderness is entirely contained within the NWR, so it should be discussed to some extent in this article anyhow.  At present, the Wilderness article consists of two paragraphs: one on the Ft. N. Wilderness specifically, and one of boilerplate on Wilderness Areas generally.  The entirety of the first paragraph could be incorporated into this article; the second could be dropped altogether, in favor of a Wikilink to National Wilderness Preservation System.  The combined article wouldn't exceed Start-length; the article histories suggest that both have expanded very slowly, and wouldn't be likely to reach excessive length in the foreseeable future.  Ammodramus (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me....I think I started both articles.--MONGO 19:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

text: I changed my mind...they are under different acts...NWR acts and Wilderness Acts so better to keep them as stand alone articles with links.--MONGO 21:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Thom Robb

message: The article still needs some work.
It would be nice to include the pg number for the Woody Allen reference.
His hatred of the word still needs a source and if not provided needs to be deleted.
Please leave the references section in the article, there may be other books about the subject that other editors may add later.
TheRingess 08:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: I don't have the book I read it in Barns and Noble Yesterday.
132.241.245.49 08:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry
Talk:Charles-Michel de l'Épée

message: I know this won't exactly help with the article, but I just have to say, I love when google features a person with a wikipedia page. It opens the page up to more edits, and makes it more detailed. Thanks google! Alex of Canada (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: yes!  It brought me here.  It says he died at the beginning of the French Revolution.  Is this relevant, or a purely temporal marker?  Was his death somehow related to the fact of the FR? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 23:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love when google features a person
Talk:The Autumn Effect

message: I found :Image:10 Years - The Autumn Effect.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:10 Years - The Autumn Effect.jpg]]

message: :Image:10 Years - The Autumn Effect.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been taken care of now.  Added source, artist etc.Shatterzer0 04:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:10 Years - The Autumn Effect.jpg
Talk:Psyclone (roller coaster)

message: There are multiple sources that state Six Flags announced the permanent closure of Psyclone in late January 2007, and this Wikipedia article states it continued to operate until the end of the month. However, RCDB lists 2006 as the last year of operation. Came across the following forum thread:
:Theme Park Review's main SFMM thread
When searching for Psyclone within that discussion, page 59 (and a couple other pages) have posts that state December was the last time the ride operated:
:Page 59 of the search I mentioned
We can't use the forum as a reliable source, but I think it's fair to say that RCDB is likely correct. I'll be rephrasing this in the article. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing date 
Talk:Raging Bull (roller coaster)

message: Someone needs to define "hyper-twister".  A quick google search didn't lead to a definition...  --Rehcsif 03:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyper-twister?

message: Who are these roller coaster experts who say the best ride is in back?  There's no citation, and all I've ever heard one way or another seems to be rationalizing without any real scientific explanation behind it.  Anyone got a link for these experts saying the back seat is best, or, even better, a reason why the back seat is best based on some well-grounded physics explanation? Stever Augustus (talk) 18:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back row?
Talk:Network Against Prohibition

message: The top half seems to have been writen by a supporter, and the bottom half by a critic, neither sticking to NPOV. Agree?  Eivind 08:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The see also and external links sections need to be pruned.  RJFJR (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Did extensive cleanup, chopped it down to a stub, though still needs refs. MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Further cleanup
Talk:Rita (roller coaster)

message: What's the mention of stealth and Thorpe Park all about?
I have no idea what that is about, so I removed it as it seemed totally unrelated. --Vulk 20:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The introduction says that the ride accelerates to a speed of 61.1 mph in a time of 2.5 seconds. The next section says that it accelerates to 62 mph in 2.5 seconds. The table on the right gives 62 mph in 2.3 seconds. Which is it?! — Fly by Night (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions
Talk:Son of Beast

message: Google search or bing search Son of Beast 2012 and every article about the SOB being closed this season has been deleted and the source on here that is cited does not say anything about it either which could mean one of two things: the SOB will open this season or its fate has been decided and it is most likely to be demolished. Keep an eye out for one of the two.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.82.68.32 (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The website that was cited did say the future has not yet been determined. You now have to pay to read the article but it does say that they're still evaluating options.--Astros4477 (talk) 10:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 season 

message: At the very end I would add a link about information about SOB's former coaster, The Beast.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.129.100 (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: --Astros4477 (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Jasrotia

message: ----
--203.134.207.231 08:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I am Hitender Singh Jasrotia,resident of Chamba town,Distt Chamba,Himachal Pradesh.Any one belongs to jasrotia family may please Email : jasrotiahsingh@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.248.192.176 (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am Hitender Singh Jasrotia 

message: is a dubious source. The writer is offering various theories about origin of an artist and cites H. A. Rose for the point that we use in our article. The problem is that Rose is no longer considered reliable, although back in 1966, when Goswamy was writing, the British Raj era writers were still often thought to be ok. - Sitush (talk) 02:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. What about this one published by Daily Excelsior? Anup [Talk] 02:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing wrong with that. Doesn't add much but it's fine - the issue is actually covered in books also. - Sitush (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goswamy source
Talk:Faisal bin Abdullah Al Saud (born 1978)

message: Same person? This one served as Chief Scout, Saudi Arabia Scout Association--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure, but this is Faisal bin Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Googled him, brought me to Faisal bin Abdullah bin Mohammed Al Saud, somehow Wikipedia didn't catch that...--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not your fault. Even major news sources get Saudi people mixed up with similarly named people, but sometimes they are in fact that the same person which is why I'm not sure. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faisal Bin Abdullah Bin Muhammad Al Saud? 

message: Sir I am helpless boy , sir can you help me???? I have no future  so plese help me , my A/C no--- 11719797010, IFSC code SBIN0005914, name TASLIM WARIF SARKAR Warif sarkar (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir I am helpless boy , sir can you help me???? I have no future  so plese help me , my A/C no--- 11719797010, IFSC code SBIN0005914, name TASLIM WARIF SARKAR
Talk:Thunderbolt (Kennywood)

message: This article claims that Pippin was redesigned into the Thunderbolt. The article The Pippin (Kennywood) claims that most of it was torn down, and the Thunderbold was a new ride. This has obvious implications for the future of the articles - one article or two? Info, anyone? --Alvestrand 21:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pippin and Thunderbolt: One ride or two? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.kennywood.com/experiences/attractions/thunderbolt https://www.themeparktourist.com/features/20181103/36308/wildest-wooden-roller-coasters-earth. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Epicgenius (talk) 16:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Timber Wolf (roller coaster)

message: Considerably fleshed out article (like, you know, added where it is) and removed stub and content listing. If anyone wants to add more, feel free to do so. It's been a while since I rode the Timber Wolf and all I remember about it is that I absolutely hated the damn thing. 204.69.40.7 17:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know of any other rides at Worlds of Fun that have caused a death. To my knowledge the rest have just been minor injuries.--Moonraker0022 22:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For consistency and ease of finding the info on amusement park ride accident stories in Wikipedia, the info is consolidated onto the various Incidents at... pages.  That way, if more (or accurate) info is found on the story, we don't have to go all over the place updating it.  Cheers!  SpikeJones 23:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, it does hurt to have the info in 2 places, as the info will only be updated on the Incidents page as necessary.  (see any number of inconsistent pieces of information on other topics due to being scattered across pages; if you need specific examples of info not being updated correctly, let me know) This is consistent with how we've been handling all ride accident sections across the board. SpikeJones 13:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accidents on the Tiber Wolf or WOF

message: If this roller coaster had its logo updated since the 2018 refurbishment, why isn't the modernized logo in this article yet and still using the outdated logo? FrancineFan3883 (talk) 01:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo needs to be updated
Talk:Genericon

message: what the hell is this about? T boyd 09:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, someone dumped a ton of info in from Genericon Conbooks (see here). This was very unencyclopedic (Lots of POV problems, informal tone). I trimmed it down to the essentials. Danski14(talk) 22:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Doctor in the House (film)

message: Just saw that the beginning of this movie, the entrance is actually the main entrance to University College London, should we add this in a trivia section? cncplyr (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See WP:Trivia sections. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UCL