lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light

message: I just tried to copy and translate from the German page. Please help by editing...
--Mknauer 21:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start 

message: --Remotelysensed (talk) 09:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: * I have taken the effort to rewrite most of the article, adjust the partially largely outdated content and solve the reference issues. Now all content is properly referenced. Therefore I would like to ask someone who can, to remove the ref improve request marker. Is that possible? --Akriesch (talk) 20:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten and solved reference issues 

message: I have redirected MPRG Erlangen Division 3 to this page, as there was no particular information of value there or reason for the page to exist independently. PianoDan (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

message: This article reads like an advertisement. 129.236.21.139 (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Sanasar

message: This reads like an advertisment without encyclopedic content.  Probobly a speedy delete, but I'll give you the benafit of the doubt. Dayleyj 21:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like this re-edit better, but I still question your motives Dayleyj 23:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Irish Red Cross Society

message: There has been ongoing attempts by at least 3 editors to remove the 'Controversies' section from the article: 
*  
*  
*  
are the editors involved. No edit summaries, no talk page comments, no attempt to justify their positions. The IP editor has been reverted at least 5 time since first editing the page in April 2011.
I have warned the editor aout wp:disruptive editing and wp:COI, and tried to  by requesting they use this page to discuss, since then they have again made  and been reverted. 
Please comment on this issue. Should the section be removed? Even though it is referenced, how relevant is it to the article? Is it placing undue weight on alledged mismanagement of donated funds? - 220.101 \ 19:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of uncomplimentary, referenced content
Talk:Michizō Tachihara

message: This entry about a poet (!) suffers from the same shortcomings which are typical for most of wikipedia's entries about men and women of lettres. The attempt to define Michizos poetry in the opening paragraph is not even acceptable to someone who is not trained in literary studies. I would like to see a category of criticism introduced on wikipedia discussion pages which addresses this kind of failure. It is quite absurd that in an entry which only exists because of someone's merits as a poet this person's literary production is presented in terms which are not appropriate at all. As I said before, to me this seems to be a bigger issue, something which is wrong with most of the literary biographies on wikipedia. (Owen Ogletree (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dublin City Council

message: The senior staff changed Monday 21st August 2023. I work in the council. Owen Keegan is out, replaced by Richard Shakespeare. Eileen Quinlivan took over Richards role as Deputy Chief Executive. Anthony Flynn is now the Assistant Chief Executive and Derek Kelly replaces Anthony as the Executive Manager. Bruce Philips will take Derek's old role of Acting Executive Manager. I'm not sure how to get that information approved by wikipedia so that the main page can be updated. It was covered in the Irish Times, a national newspaper. (https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/dublin/2023/09/04/owen-keegan-bows-out-after-10-years-as-dublin-city-council-chief-executive)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.191.238.49 (talk) 11:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to Executive Staff

message: "Brutalist" derives from "beton brut", the use of raw concrete, and not from brutality meaning cruelty. All the blocks at Wood Quay are Brutalist.86.42.198.104 (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Brutalist architecture

message: Are elected councillors "legislators" for the city? Do they make or pass any laws? Or do they just ensure that national law is implemented properly in the city? In what sense, if any, do they make laws? This article doesn't address the very important issue. 109.77.193.231 (talk) 15:26, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They don't pass statute law; they;re empowered - delegated - to pass By-laws. Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Legislators?
Talk:Charles Paget (conspirator)

message: Hi LadyMeg,
Yesterday you replaced Thomas Throckmorton with Francis Throckmorton in this sentence:
After this, Charles Paget, in conjunction with Morgan and other malcontents at home and abroad, continued their plans, which were well known to the English government, and in June 1584 Sir Edward Stafford, the English ambassador to the French court, made a formal demand, in the name of Queen Elizabeth, for the surrender of Thomas Paget, Charles Paget, Charles Arundel, Francis Throckmorton, and Thomas Morgan for having conspired against the life of the English Queen.
I didn't write the original sentence, which still requires a citation for verification, but the original editor must have been correct in stating that it was Thomas Throckmorton, as according to the National Archives (see ), Francis Throckmorton had been arrested in England for his part in the Babington plot in November 1583 and was executed in July 1584. It must thus have been Thomas Throckmorton whom the Queen wanted returned to England from France in June 1584. Accordingly, I've replaced Francis with Thomas in the article again. There was a disambiguation notice beside Thomas' name. He still needs to be differentiated from other Thomas Throckmortons. NinaGreen (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Throckmorton
Talk:Óengus mac Colmáin

message: My reading of the text of Baile Chuind, as published in translation on mayjones, is that the king following Suibhne Meann is Domnall mac Áedo, described as a "glorious Óengus". Marcas.oduinn (talk) 10:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: However, see Eoin O'Flynn, Clann Cholmáin c.550-916, p.44, note 7: "Murphy took 'Óengus' as an epithet of the following Domnall, i.e. 'Domnall shall be a glorious Óengus', but both the more recent edition and scholarship prefer to see a simple list with 'Óengus' representing a separate individual." Marcas.oduinn (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore, leave the text as is, and add Óengus to the list of kings in Baile Chuind (List of High Kings of Ireland#Kings in the Baile Chuind) Marcas.oduinn (talk) 23:49, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glorious Óengus
Talk:British Rail Class 93 (InterCity 250)

message: In my opinion it is valid to have this article, given that there are other articles concerning proposed but unbuilt rolling stock - two examples are Class 341 (proposed Crossrail stock) and Class 447 (proposed "Battersea Bullet" stock). Hammersfan 25/10/07, 22.33 BST
:Certainly I agree that it’s valid to cover this stock — it just seems that it would be more informative if the information on the InterCity 250 were concentrated in one place, rather than split over two articles. David Arthur (talk) 15:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:War Stories with Oliver North

message: Why does this article read like an advertisement for the program? (143.167.204.150 (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality?
Talk:Facebook

message: I tried to edit the Wikipedia article with the title "Facebook" and there seemed to be a malfunction when I pressed the preview button. The normal preview type page was not shown. Instead, I saw a page with the title "Facebook" but the content was only criticism and/or controversy of Facebook. Nothing I did would bring up the correct preview page. I then tried clicking publish, and also got a malfunction.
Here's a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook Polar Apposite (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As you can see, if you click the link, it takes you to a page about criticism of Facebook. Polar Apposite (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I guess it's a case of vandalism. Probably no need to talk of a virus or hacker. Polar Apposite (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be back to normal now. I think someone fixed it just now. Polar Apposite (talk) 20:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urgent. Has a virus or a hacker got into the Facebook article? 

message: No mention of 2018 Athena ISP satellite project, eg. Facebook is officially building an internet satellite: Athena. widely reported. - Rod57 (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 Athena ISP satellite project 

message: A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Facebook status box.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Facebook status box.jpg listed for discussion 

message: — Assignment last updated by MrLavoie (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cybersecurity Policy

message: I've not got reliable sources but the chatter and realtime experience is that Meta is down as of this datestamp. BusterD (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it’s been mentioned by Variety and USA Today. The Film Creator (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's see it's got any legs. Certainly have RS now. All about Super Tuesday outage. BusterD (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve also started a discussion at the talk page on Instagram as well. The Film Creator (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There’s also an outage on Messenger (software) per The Independent. The Film Creator (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obviously WP:OR, but despite all of the news stories I can log in without any problem to Facebook at the moment. This means that it is not an outage with the website down completely. This needs some time to ensure that it meets WP:10YT.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major outage today?
Talk:Witches of Warboys

message: Last year, I read a novel describing Agnes Samuel's apparent survival, and her attempt to sabotage the lives of the current Throckmortons as revenge. It was called "Weird Sister". I had no idea that it was based on true events, until now. But, there is no article on Wikipedia about this novel. Would someone like to help me write one? Or, I could simply add a section to this article stating that such a novel has been written, and say in a nutshell what it's about? And then someday, someone might write the article about it... What do people think? Should I add the section? NoriMori (talk) 16:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel based on Witches of Warboys

message: Hello, I am a student from SUNY New Paltz.. Over the next couple of weeks, I will be making significant changes to the page with the help of half a dozen reliable sources I have found in our library, including a more detailed outline of the trials, information of the accusers, defendants, and victims. I will also provide insight on how witchcraft and religion were related in England at this point in time.
Witchesofwarboys (talk) 17:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Revisions 

message: Robert Throckmorton and family were from the county of Esquire, though both families were of the same town.
:County of Esquire? I think not. Valetude (talk) 03:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:La Junta Subdivision

message: These items need to be fixed.  The UP crosses BNSF in Peabody, Kansas.  These say the UP crosses 2.2 miles east of Peabody, which is wrong.  I don't know the mile marker for the UP crossing, instead just wanted you to know it is wrong.
43.9 UP RR (crossing) 
46.1 Peabody 
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  03:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake
Talk:Silicon Image

message: FYI, the source code bug was worked out here with Electron and I think we reached a reasonable compromise based on the current text.  User:King4057 21:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Compromise
Talk:Tom Jeffords

message: Kudos to the authors of this article - but doesn't anyone know that both the movie and TV series Broken Arrow were derived from the novel Blood Brother by Elliott Arnold? Arnold's name was featured prominently in the credits for both the movie and the TV show - I'm amending the article to reflect this. Sensei48 (talk) 10:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Novel 

message: The article claimed that an Arizona mail delivery service became part of the Pony Express system. The well referenced PE article states that if ran in 1859 and 1860 between St. Louis and San Francisco. Not only is the factoid not referenced, it also contradicts the sources from the PE article. Ergo, the removal doesn't constitute original research. Tapered (talk) 07:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pony Express

message: The intro says "With the blessing of Cochise, Jeffords married an Indian girl named Morning Star. She was killed in a raid shortly after the marriage." but there is nothing about this in the body of the article and no reference. RJFJR (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage

message: "Between 1867 and 1869, Jeffords was the superintendent of a mail line from Tucson to Socorro. He apparently gave people to understand that he had met Cochise during this period and negotiated a peace for his mail riders. This is very unlikely as they were attacked as often, seldom, after he took charge as before." Cochise would not have requested Jeffords (and no other person) as an Indian agent if he had not come to know him before. Nobody knows if the mail riders were attacked by men from Cochise's band or others. And Jeffords did not make himself friends by revealing this treaty (but maybe he got some more mail rider candidates). - Bafibo (talk) 11:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meeting with Cochise
Talk:Richard Stuart Lake

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of this article. Cheers, CP 15:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Institution of Engineers of Ireland

message: All Chartered Engineers are entitled to use the Chartered Engineer userbox,  just copy the code from Edit this page and post to edit your User page.  As well as to this Article the logo's link to Portal: Engineering and Portal: Sustainable development. Jagra (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Userboxes
Talk:Tumbleweed Communications

message: There is a dead link returning 404 page in the main label section for company website.This needs to be corrected. 
Am not sure whether this is a right place to raise a flag on wrong link, Please correct me if am wrong. Thanks! 
- Karthik Sripal (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link
Category talk:Lists of World War I veterans

message: How come this is only about really old guys, and not other people who fought in WWI? -LtNOWIS 22:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a very good question. How is this not a duplicate of :Category:Military personnel of World War I? Who comes up with these distinctions, really? Dahn (talk) 23:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Government House (Saskatchewan)

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 15:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Stanford (disambiguation)

message: I propose to split this disambig page into two:  one for Stanford and one for Stamford. Each page will link to the other from a "See also" section. This is precisely as the Kington/Kingston example given in the Style Guild. Am I wrong?  I realize I may be proposing to undo a merge that had been previously agree to. That's why I'm bringing it here first.  But this current page just seems wrong.  Hult041956 22:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Btyner (talk) 16:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split Stanford and Stamford disamb pages

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 11:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Stanford (disambiguation) →  – I'm not convinced that the university is clearly the primary topic for the single work given the placenames and its usage as a name etc including the town its self in California. Although the surname holders are PTMs the university is also arguably one, the university has 85,042 views the place in California has 7,875 (though its common to treat the state as part of the name its still a full match for "Stanford" unlike the university) Stanford-le-Hope has 3,197 though again that's not a full match. Allen Stanford has 11,978, Jason Gray-Stanford has 11,218, Leland Stanford has 9,920, Aaron Stanford has 8,290 and Stanford White has 7,471. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 March 2021
Talk:Shadow Hand

message: Is there a "sinisterous" version?  Or are they all R?-- (James McNally)  (talkpage)  22:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: e-mail the company: contact@shadowrobot.com  -  Rocketmagnet 00:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Version?

message: Economist wrote about Shadow Hand last month: Robotics: Lend a hand | The Economist. I'll try to insert references to this article later this week (unless someone beats me to it) --Weronix (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Economist

message: I would like to see some info on how well this hand is replacing the human hand in terms of affordability.1archie99 (talk) 15:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costs Comment 

message: What is the history of the Shadow Hand? When was the first commercial version released? Georg Stillfried (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Songbird (disambiguation)

message: Songbird might be a program...
It is also a Foe on an upcoming game Bioshock infinite  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.193.198.126 (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songbird 

message: Songbird is also a Bee Gees song from their album Main Course in 1976 67.70.57.47 (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. —ShelfSkewed Talk 05:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Bee Gees
Talk:Barrage (artillery)

message: I am giving the article a B-class rating, but I am being generous here. The article meets the criteria on paper, but in reality still needs work. More refernces are required than are currently given, 
:Subsequently downgraded back to Start-class by another reviewer who left no comments here, but seems to be on grounds of lack of references.  Cyclopaedic (talk • contribs) 09:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many further references added, with more details from other sources. Cyclopaedic (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Done: restructured the article with sections on development of the creeping barrage, explanation of standing and box barrages, and the benefits and drawbacks of the barrage. Cyclopaedic 22:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More structure and history added from other sources Cyclopaedic (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class assessment

message: Fratricide was a very real consideration when barrages were used along with troop movement. One of the values of GPS is that it gives both precise time and position references that were not available in WWI. Start with Special reconnaissance#Offset GOLIS, and further content in that article, to see some of the methods where we still are trying to solve the fratricide problem. I think Special reconnaissance itself is relevant to the project
It might be of interest to look at  countermeasures to artillery, starting with WWI techniques. If anyone looks at any of the MASINT articles, I'd like opinions if they and other intelligence articles are related to MilHist -- possibly the science subproject. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some additional points to consider

message: The first picture is almost certainly not a barrage.  The assertion that a 'barrage' was used in FI is nonsence, probably misuse of the term by someone who doesn't know what a barrage is, and as explained in this article. UK doctrine abandoned barrages in the 1960s (and its doubtful that one was used in training for the decade before that), and the computing devices used in FI did not support barrages.  They may have used a linear with the observer ordering corrections to move it but this is complicated and slow and its more likely simple concentrations were used and moved. Nfe (talk) 07:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Points
Talk:Elliot Abravanel

message: This article read like a promotional flyer for "The Body Type Program". I removed wholesale a section on Body Type Characteristics it was completely unsourced and contained claims that would need support by WP:MEDRS. I added qualifiers to the claims in the second section and included the statement by Gittleman. Further editing is needed, at this point I am having difficulty finding any serious discussion of "The Body Type Program" or RS coverage of Abravanel. - - MrBill3 (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pared down, unsupported medical claims removed 

message: The wife got a flyer in the pennysaver talking about this stuff. My default assumption is something might be woo so I'll go online to research it. Mainly woo sites are talking about it so I'd like to find out a bit more. I'm assuming this is like alkaline water. But I don't want to dismiss out of hand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.132.104.241 (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get some science in here? 
Talk:Radio Proto

message: I'd have thought that the languages of a radio station's broadcasts were well worth mentioning especially in the case of Cyprus. Or can't they bring themselves to mention the other side?--SilasW (talk) 20:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages
Talk:Silversea Cruises

message: Sylvia m. Teachout.        MSHenson (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silversea
Talk:Aalberts

message: Should there be a list of brands owned? I believe "Apollo" valves are now made by Aalberts. 2600:8804:6600:45:55DB:FA1C:6EF7:8AF3 (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brands?