lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ethel & Ernest

message: The film seciton is unclear (does it refer to one, two or three versions?) and is out-of-date. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film versions 

message: I wanted to check before editing the title of the page but I think it is "Ethel & Ernest" not "Ethel and Ernest". My first clue was the title of the animated movie but it might've changed when crossing media. The cover of the book used in the picture on the Wiki page and the listing for the book on Amazon.co.uk both show it as using the ampersand rather than the word. It's not a huge difference but I thought we should maybe change the page to reflect the correct title? ≈ Seraph 00:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  And or &
Talk:Louis Legrand

message: This page is an almost verbatim copy of --Jahsonic (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Arwas, Victor. Belle Époque, New York, 1978.. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 16:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:It's Immaterial

message: The page on It's Immaterial should never have been nominated for deletion. I've worked on the page but I would ask anyone else with an interest in British indie-pop of the 80s to help improve the page. Yozzer66 (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One of the (now removed) blog references cited another (non-blog) source. The blog was only used because the original source has now removed the desired quotation. The non-blog source is now referenced but is not dated or linked. Yozzer66 (talk) 11:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blog Reference in Article
Talk:Tiana Lemnitz

message: This article was written by Dalia Geffen, president of the Boston Wagner Society and is used here by permission. Paul 01:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This goes against WP:OWN. -- kosboot (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No it does not; but if any of the original text from 2007 remains (see ), then the permission must be verified; via WP:OTRS Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the Metropolitan Opera Data Base, Tiana Lemnitz never appeared there. 
208.87.248.162 (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged MET Appearance
Talk:Roman Opałka

message: I was just looking at one of Roman Opalka's counting paintings and my eyes fell on a number written TWICE! How common is that?  Tewner (talk) 11:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, your observation counts as original research, unless someone else has written that they have observed a duplicate number. Im surprised that no one else has observed this (if it wasnt a hallucination from poring over one of his canvases). I am also wondering if anyone has connected his paintings to asemic writing. Interesting that there are artistic movements which parallel psychiatric conditions.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.135.151 (talk) 22:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate Number
Talk:Europe: A History

message: I hesitated to include Appelbaum's, because she has her own misconceptions. For example, she writes "since independence, the Ukrainian state has behaved in an exemplary fashion toward its minorities", which is plain false, both at the time of the writing, and especially today, and some other less egregious utterances. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anne Applebaum
Talk:Section d'Or

message: This article has just undergone an entire restructuring. Texts and references have been added, along with images of works shown at the Salon de la Section d'Or in 1912, and an image of a publication that accompanied the exhibition. Coldcreation (talk) 08:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire article revised 
Talk:William Sansom

message: William Sansom also illustrated "Who's Zoo" a work of light verse by Michael Braude
82.46.29.180 01:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Published 1963, not 1953. I named that section of the works William Sansom#As illustrator and corrected/expanded the one listing. The Library of Congress also reports a 1965 US edition, . --P64 (talk) 00:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled [As illustrator]
Talk:Evening's Empire

message: I’m almost certain this title is a reference to a Mr. Tambourine Man lyric. Can anyone find a source? ⤺ms.⁴⁵ 01:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Ever Since Darwin

message: This page reads like an ad for the book. --V2Blast (talk) 02:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way too masturbatory
Talk:Édouard Pingret

message: I removed the following text:
Some auction results:
*October 2000 Sotheby's, "Rebecca, from Walter Scott's 'Ivanhoe'" - $14,000
*November 1997 Sotheby's, "Escribanos en Los Portales de la Plaza de Santo Domingo" - $52,500
*His painting "Cocina poblans, " 1870, 22⅞ × 16½ inches was sold at Sotheby's New York, May 17, 1994 for $150,000.
This type of information should have better citations. Rococo1700 (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Bright-line rule

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 01:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: This article seems to focus almost exclusively on the US. I'm tagging it with . If anybody has any experience with bright-line rules as they are implemented outside of the US, please add to the article. DD4235 (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-centric POV?
Talk:Everything That Rises Must Converge

message: This book was featured on the Season 5 finale of the television show LOST.  Should this be included in the section?
- Ccchhhrrriiisss 14 May 2009 10:31
Ugh, this is terrible. The Summary section is a mishmash of florid, ungrammatical, run-on sentences. A particularly odious example: "O'Connor, while writing of the violence humans inflict upon one another, mainly referencing the concept of antimaterialism, integrating notions of indifference, grace, faith, and morality, as that was a central concern of all of the short stories in this collection." I can't help; I came here looking for information. Here's hoping some O'Connor fan comes to this article's rescue. 24.128.188.152 (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Evidence (short story)

message: I don't have access to the original, but  in the abbreviated version in I, Robot put out be Oxford University Press, but in that version, Dr. Calvin is telling the story and at the end already says that Byerley became the first World Governor. (This is different from what our text now says.)
Also, at one point, Byerley addresses his "teacher" as "John."  This is not for public consumption, since they are speaking while alone.  This exchange can be used to argue that Byerley is not a robot (android) since Quinn had argued that the teacher was in fact (named) Byerley, but it can be argued that it indicates Byerley is in fact a robot, since creating a second robot is what "John" was probably doing. 211.225.33.104 (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative sequence; robot or not
Talk:Jean-Baptiste Huet

message: Does Huet paintings have wedges in back?I have a painting appears to be signed JB Huet of herd of sheep gathered around shepherd being fed.Could be his lost ‘Adoration of the Shepards’1875 award winner in Paris.It has wedges but might have been worked on late 1800s. 2603:6010:2F01:769:6D76:6D9E:D922:CC07 (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean-Baptiste Huet
Talk:Evolving the Alien

message: Are they going to make a movie/documentary series about this? I'd love to watch it.--Sonjaaa 22:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there is this series called The Future Is Wild which comes pretty close, although I haven't read the book. The series is absolutely amazing. --MarSch 12:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bill Yosses

message: This page has been requested for speedy deletion due to the fact that the person in question has not had sufficient notability established. Mr Yosses is indeed the White House pastry chef, so I cannnot understand the reason for the speedy deletion request. I feel that deletion of this page should at least be voted on, rather than summarily eliminated. Also, I changed the external link from a New York Times article to a White House press release.Mikemoto, 00:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A large number of potentially useful sources were brought up at this article's AfD discussion. Those continuing with the article might find them useful in writing it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potentially useful sources
Talk:Experimental Researches

message: I've turned this page into a brief discussion of the book, hopefully with "hooks" to let others expand it. It shows how the book fits into the series, briefly discusses its contents, and contains links to detailed online abstracts of every chapter, and to the book's entry in the catalog of Princeton University Press. In my experience, it isn't easy to find this material on one's own. I'm planning to do this with other books in the series, and would appreciate comments about that project. With luck, I might be able to do one book per day. Lou Sander (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a redirect 
Template talk:NASCAR

message: This should probably be in the box, alongside Buschwakers, since both are words used for the sports to describe a group of drivers. Casey14 01:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Road Course Ringers

message: It is huge and ugly and has links to things that are unimportant and links that are under the wrong names and it isn't formatted right. Am I alone on this? Recury 19:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I hate it

message: I have replaced the NASCAR on NBC link with the NASCAR on TNT. I did this because NBC doesn't show NASCAR for now and I felt that the template doesn't need past television links and needs to be kept current. Hence why I replaced it with NASCAR on TNT which is current. Sawblade05 07:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NASCAR on NBC

message: Ok, I dug through the history and found out when the large blank space on the right side of the template.  It was right here.  But I can't quite figure out exactly what part of that edit did it, or what needs to be done to eliminate it.  Or just rewriting all that nasty table hardcode with  would solve things too. :)  — MrDolomite • Talk 07:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blank space on right 

message: Does anyone have a list of all the series NASCAR has had over the years?  I know that it once had a midget series, a dirt late-model series in the Midwest, and I think it also had a drag racing series.
Pja1981 (talk) 23:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where in this would the former Australian NASCAR series go? Presently represented by the Australian Stock Car Auto Racing article, although that really needs to be split into three articles for the sanctioning body and the two major classes, Australian NASCAR and AUSCAR. --Falcadore (talk) 02:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former NASCAR series 

message: Please change Nationwide Series to Xfinity Series
2602:306:C448:ECD9:91CA:9D60:76A8:2A15 (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - It seems they change there name every 3/4 years ... Wouldn't it be a better to just stick to the articles name ? ...  –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2014 

message: I was de-orphaning and saw that article, so I put that page in the template... Yamont (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former teams 

message: Since this navbox is about NASCAR the company as much as any other aspect, would it make sense to add a list of the tracks that are outright owned by NASCAR? Just a thought I had. oknazevad (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested addition
Talk:Exposition of the Creed

message: The article in its present condition isn't much of an article--and with this long, long quote, I doubt it can stand: it looks like something for Wikiquote. However, I have no doubt that a Google Books search should quickly deliver something worthwhile; find the sources and you'll find the interest and the material. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of the article
Talk:Extremism in America: A Reader

message: This book contains a copyrighted article that was used without the permission or knowledge of the authors. The authors would never have given permission for the article [Government is Women's Enemy"} to be used in a book with the title "Extremism in America" nor in any book along with the scurrilous groups like the Ku Klux Klan.  The authors, who just learned about this infringement, will be consulting a lawyer and contacting NYU Press.
The original pamphlet version of this article was copyright 1979 and was reprinted by permission in 1982 in a book that is also copyrighted. Only two places Lyman Sargent (author of this book) could have found it. If you want to know the authors of the article, contact me. I am protecting them from the effects of being associated with the revolting groups in this book.
Giveupfaith (talk) 01:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Infringment
Talk:Valentin de Boulogne

message: A lot of the information in this article seems to be taken directly from other sources (Grove Art?). Also, the description of the Fortune Teller Soldiers is completely wrong for an encyclopedia. Too personal of a voice. Honestly, I think this article needs to be rewritten from scratch. --Stomme 08:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it seems this is copied directly (with minor shuffling) from: http://mehallowk.bravehost.com/fortuneteller.html --Stomme 09:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I've added a few facts gleaned from a magazine article (referenced) and may do more later, though this is a pretty terrible article, and really could do with complete rewriting as suggested above. Peas&you (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Valentin de Boulogne - Soldiers Playing Cards and Dice (The Cheats).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 1, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-08-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Valentin de Boulogne - Soldiers Playing Cards and Dice (The Cheats).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Faceless Killers

message: A chance to ask questions to improve this article! Henning Mankell will be talking about Faceless Killers on the BBC radio programme World Book Club. You can submit a question or ask to be part of the audience by emailing worldbookclub@bbc.co.uk or by using the form on the World Book Club homepage. You can also leave a question on the World Book Club Facebook page. Recording is on Saturday 28th May 2011, at 13.00 in the Woodstock Bookshop, Woodstock, Oxfordshire. EdQuine (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henninng Mankell on the BBC's World Book Club
Talk:Bucky bit

message: I was at Stanford when the term Bucky Bit was invented.  It originally referred to the two extra modifier keys on the Philco display terminals on the PDP-1, referred to individually as “left Bucky” and “right Bucky”.  The two modifier keys controled the high two bits transmitted from the keyboard to the CPU.  Professor Wirth's nickname was "Bucky Beaver".  Unfortunately, I do not have authoratitive refreences for these statements—they are based only on my memory. John Sauter (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:The Gershwins' Porgy and Bess

message: Some of the details on the infobox may need refined. Information was somewhat sketchy. Asphalt Buffet 03:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:False Colours

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata
Talk:Roger de Piles

message: Hello, 
The entry gives the impression that the table of painters' scores is complete, but in fact it is not. Notably, Poussin is missing: https://archive.org/details/depeintureparpri00pile/page/n512/mode/1up
Maybe the entry could be altered to clarify that the table only gives the names of some painters and not all (or the missing painters added)?
Many thanks in advance.
195.213.40.170 (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table from Cours de peinture par principes avec un balance de peintres (1708)
Talk:Fanfare (magazine)

message: I just referred to this article to check a date, but noted this unsupported statement: "The magazine's business model includes the editor directly contacting artists unsolicited, guaranteeing a review if they advertise in the magazine." I wrote for Fanfare for over nine years, and while there are aspects of the publisher's business model with which I take issue, this statement is not an accurate description of what is offered. Artists for whom positive reviews have already been submitted by a critic are contacted with an offer for a feature article, usually an interview, with the agreement to advertise in the magazine. Some artists have a longer-term relationship in which they initiate an arrangement for advertising and a feature article themselves. Occasionally, an artist will be approached on the basis of a recommendation from a critic on staff. Reviews are published in the magazine, on the website, and often on Amazon's listing for the recording, regardless of the response from the artist. The vast majority of reviews have no associated advertising/interview associated with them.
Where this policy becomes problematic is when the disc is then sent to reviewers after such an agreement is made. They are sent with a request that they only be reviewed if the critical response is positive. No critic to my knowledge is ever pressured to be anything but candid, but this possibility then leads to multiple copies being distributed so a reviewer or reviewers who like(s) the release can be found. If no positive review can be secured, a rare but not unheard-of occurrence, the advertising agreement is withdrawn.
More recently, the publisher has also added greater visibility on the Fanfare website for those who pay to be included in the "Not to be Missed" section. Reviews for inclusion here are handled in the same way.
The statement, as it stands, suggests a direct quid-pro-quo arrangement to obtain a review. Again, this is not the situation and would clearly be unethical if it was. The actual "model," while I do not personally care for it, is much more nuanced than the Fanfare article, as written, would suggest. 
I would be happy to edit this statement in line with the above, but this might run afoul of "primary research" restrictions. The publisher has written an article on this, describing the process in its most positive light, but it is accurate as far as it goes. (http://fanfarearchive.com/ntbm/articles/flegler-wonderm.html) Might this be used as a source? Rgrames (talk) 21:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on Fanfare's business model
Talk:Arabian (video game)

message: This maximum score is rather bogus. Since I personally back in 84 played (in Finland) several times over 220000 points (entering to the 3rd round) and at least one other person did so too. It's so long ago I dont remember how many people total exceeded 219750, could have been as many as 4. My final record until the game was taken away (local supermarket) was either 232000ish or 252000ish. I was close beating the third round dying for the last time at the 4th level of 3rd. Yes, ghosts threw 3 balls, and the game significantly went extremely sluggish while the balls flew.
Naturally this long after there's nothing more than memories of those involved to prove that. So I will only put this into the talk page.
I wish I'd get a playable version of this game, one where the blue mother bird also appears. Xmame's version lacks her for some reason and she's important in scoring huge.
-- mika
210.55.198.32 01:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harold Frumpkin

message: Simple: character with not that big importance in the series, no outside notability. Article with no reliable secondary sources. The proposal is to merge this into both character lists. --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this article should be merged into List of All Grown Up! characters, List of Rugrats characters and Angelica and Susie's Pre-School Daze. His biggest part was in All Grown Up! (in which he even had main storylines based around him), so I suggest redirecting this page to [[List of All Grown Up! characters once the merge is complete. JS (chat) 11:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Constantin Xenakis

message: Removed all but museum and public art centre solo shows to here. This is an encyclopedia article not a resume.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Exhibitions

message: Removing resume-like lists of grants, committee work and teaching posts to here.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Grants and committee work
Talk:Reptar

message: reptar is so cool and he has a video gane  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reptar95 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That section is extremely confusing, as it just mentions random events and references characters without any context.  I'm not a big Rugrats fan, so I have no idea what the actual story is.  If someone who has seen the films could expand that section with more detail, it would help. <B>Torchiest</B> (talk | contribs) 13:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rugrats Film section
Talk:Raphaël Collin

message: I can't find any reliable evidence that Collin either taught or studied at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, so I'm removing references to it.  --Lockley (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beaux-Arts "membership" 