lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Unprotections

message: It's interesting that this suggestion manages to sit in a niche between the other pages related to (un)protection: WP:RFPP, WP:PP, WP:AN/I etc. As an experiment, it is perhaps worth trying out more-or-less as a de facto, 'bold' approach; there's not a great deal here that would require the hunting of the Consensus.
Presumably an article could be simply removed from this list once things have quietened down to whatever the 'normal' level of noise on that article is; it would stop being useful if it served merely as a surrogate watchlist for all the popular pages. Equally, there'd be no need to list every, nor even very many unprotections here, since that'd a)add a not-usually-useful box-to-tick and b)rapidly overwhelm the usefulness of human intervention from here, basically resulting in an instantaneous backlog. We'd also get cries of "the admin surreptitiously unprotected 'my' page and didn't list it on WP:UN to try to hide that fact from me".
In the hypothetical case of wide-spread use, I think it'd need to be understood that listing a page wouldn't be an invite to re-protect as soon as a low-grade edit is made, but a heads-up that a busy article is open again and may benefit from particular attention, up to and including re-protection if things turn out to still be really bad. A brief comment on the raison-d'etre of this suggestion: articles in a confluence of pressure-points resulting in elevated vandalism are generally so widely watched/patrolled at that time that an additional listing of them somewhere probably won't appreciably increase the vigilance ratio for the article. But for other articles it could provide a handy collective pair of eyes.
It's worth considering that it also permits an additional technical measure if bot owners can teach their offspring about this page and its changes at some reasonable refresh-rate. -Splash - tk 01:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial thoughts
Talk:Nadere Reformatie

message: Merging Nadere Reformatie with Dutch Second Reformation (as well as Further Reformation) would be acceptable.  Nadere Reformatie is the technical term of this period in church history and "Dutch Second Reformation" and "Further Reformation" are the two most common English translations recognized by the scholarship.  I am new to Wikipedia, so I am not familiar with the logistics of merging articles--any assistance would be appreciated!
- Seeing as this is the more exhaustive article, I suggest we keep this one and purge the other. Anyone doing research on this topic will be familiar with the Dutch term 'nadere reformatie'.
Seems reasonable. Sometimes the expression "Dutch reformed pietism" is also used. To my knowledge Nadere Reformatie is the most common name, but I am Dutch. The other expressions can be turned into re-directs (look at the help page for instructions).Guusb 10:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pope Urban VI

message: I have expanded this article, keeping strictly to the published opinions of Ludwig Pastor, the most sympathetic of papal histirians. I don't suppose the picture that emerges will please the ultra-Catholics. Perhaps some further historians should be brought into the picture, the better to balance it, rather than taking a red pencil to delete what is disapproved and applying a POV bumpersticker, as is usual practice. --Wetman 09:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Should include pic.  --Daniel C. Boyer 15:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arms

message: I placed in headers so that it would be easier to read. Bearian (talk) 19:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headers
Talk:Anjuman Muzareen Punjab

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 01:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: merge with Tenants Association of Punjab ? Paki.tv (talk) 10:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:Anjuman-i Taraqqi-i Urdu

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 01:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: This is a literary organization established in Pre-Independent India. Currently there are two organizations in India and Pakistan with the same name. In India Anjuman-i Taraqui-i Urdu Hind is functioning. Hence, there should be a separate page for Anjuman-i-Taraqui-Urdu Hind. Ahmed Nisar (talk) 14:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre Independence Institution
Talk:Anjuman-i-Himayat-i-Islam

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 01:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: sounds like a fine idea to merge the two; I don't have the expertise to suggest which should be the title, but merging to the article which you've tidied up seems sensible. Klbrain (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the lack of expert volunteers,  Klbrain (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for merger
Talk:Consumer Rights Commission of Pakistan

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 01:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade
Talk:The Giaour

message: I don't see how Byron's brief metaphorical use of the figure of the vampire makes 'The Giaour' a vampire story. Also, vampires were well known in England long before Byron (from the early 18th century in fact - King George II is indeed on record as saying that he believed in them) and even appeared in English poetry before Byron (see for instance Southey's 'Thalaba the Destroyer'). 
Polidori's 'Vampyre', as far as I can see, owes nothing to 'The Giaour'. Polidori created a new myth about an aristocratic globe-trotting bloodsucker, not the traditional folkloric vampire who drains the blood of its nearest kin, referred to by Lord Byron in his poem. Colin4C 01:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Vampire Story? 
Talk:Apocalypse Zero

message: The statement that this is 'regarded as the most violent anime ever released' is a pretty outlandish claim to make without any kind of citation.  Unless a citation is made I'll remove it.80.7.59.211 (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Most violent?

message: Harara is Kakugo's older brother.  When Harara merged with the Kasumi armor, he was "reformatted" into a woman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.64.182 (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Harara is male
Talk:Sardar Amir Azam Memorial Society

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 02:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: I doubt that this article can be more substantially expanded.  Its content seems suited for a small sub-section in the biography. NinetyNineFennelSeeds (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose to Merge into [[Sardar Amir Azam Khan]]
Talk:JI Youth

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 02:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: Aslaam o Alaikam 
     Dear Sir/ friends my name is sardar Faheem younis from AJK present in lahore ,first of All I have been making sure my talk my my is not wrong or just time waste every single word INSHA ALLAH is true,I m also member of shabab milli since 2005 from Rawalakot District poonch sardar Qayyum Afsar sahib is my senior ,in last 3 month I have been lost so many things such as my amount, my family ,my time and also my self respect,the only reason is that I have invested in hotels, the shalimar,Alrehman, And F&F but unfortunately there is a big mafia in this field unfortunately if I have contacted shabab e milli in same time the output will b different but I m v late ,only I think I have not allowed illegal &bad things in my hotels but I don't know there is Mafia who haven't stopped for these things 
My appeal is that please look at me,I don't want that mafia  created same situation for others
Thanks Regards 
Sardar Faheem Younis 
03025161355 119.160.98.20 (talk) 08:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frustrating and harrasing from Qabza Mafia
Talk:Lubricated Goat

message: Err... a formative part of grunge? Don't you like, have to be heard to be influential?
I just expanded the article and added Infobox/Discography.  Still need someone to determine if Plays The Devil’s Music was an EP or a full-length, since the sources I've read from vary on it.  Also need info on the years of the 7"s, and when/if the band broke up immediately following the 1994 album. Thanks Chris77xyz 20:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The performance has since made it to YouTube, which is where I and most other people will have seen it. The YouTube version has large CENSORED signs over the band's bad parts; were these CENSORED signs present in the original broadcast, or where they added later on? The world must know. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cocks
Talk:USS Yancey

message: Just noticed this, there is not a source listed for :File:USSYancey.jpg. While I do not doubt that it is PD-US Navy, there still needs to be a link to the source of the image. -MBK004 03:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the information for the photo and adjusted the contrast on it at the same time. By the way, there's a beautiful color photo of the ship on Flickr licensed as "©All rights reserved"; I e-mailed the photographer and he would be fine with it's use on Wikipedia but doesn't want to allow commercial use, which, regrettably, won't work with WP licensing :(  — Bellhalla (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you add a link to the image in the external links section? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 02:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's one of the photos that's displayed in the Navsource gallery (the first external link listed). After the e-mail exchange I had with the photographer (which was very pleasant), I'm a little reluctant to link directly to his photo. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-GA review issue
Talk:Sociological paradigm

message: I believe this page should be merged into Sociological perspective.  While I feel that both articles definately need work, the perspectives article is better organized.
:Duplicate material from sociological perspective has now been removed, and the articles are completely diffierent. There is no need to merge the articles any more. JenLouise 05:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing a notice that has been at WP:PM. Bearian 21:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Glenavon F.C.

message: Why no mention of Robbie Dennison under notable former players? I think he was there in 84-85? Or am I wrong? Jatrius (talk) 08:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Joncas

message: I am proposing that the material on this page that regards the "music wars" in general be moved to a new page.
For details on this proposal, please see A Concrete Proposal at Talk:Contemporary Catholic hymnody.  If you agree, disagree, or have comments, please comment on that page! - Lawrence King 02:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move some of this information to another page 

message: I have moved all the controversy material to Contemporary Catholic liturgical music.  Please don't add more to this page, unless it really is specific to Marty Haugen alone. - Lawrence King 06:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Done!
Talk:Tropical climate

message: it seems that this page is in conflict with the page tropics.  Factsofphotos (talk) 23:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is some useful stuff from there that should maybe come here William M. Connolley (talk) 10:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just going to post that this article needs to differentiate between the tropics as defined by geography and tropical climates as defined by temperature, precip, misc. other-stuff. -Atmoz (talk) 19:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tropics v. tropical climate
Talk:St. Louis Jesuits

message: I am proposing that the material on this page that regards the "music wars" in general be moved to a new page.
For details on this proposal, please see A Concrete Proposal at Talk:Contemporary Catholic hymnody.  If you agree, disagree, or have comments, please comment on that page! - Lawrence King 02:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move some of this information to another page 

message: I have moved all the controversy material to Contemporary Catholic liturgical music.  Please don't add more to this page, unless it really is specific to Marty Haugen alone. - Lawrence King 06:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Done! 

message: That's the question!  I wrote most of the "History" section of this page with information from this article  in America.  But it doesn't say whether Tim Manion was ever a Jesuit, although it mentions "Tim Manion's wife" in 1980. - Lawrence King 22:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Tim Manion a Jesuit? 

message: In the name of fairness, should this article mention the strong opposition to this musical movement by many within the Catholic Church? JNF Tveit (talk) 02:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already a section in the article Contemporary Catholic liturgical music that addresses the opposition that some have to modern liturgical music.  At one time there was a section in this article (which was reproduced almost exactly in the articles about several other liturgical songwriters), but the consensus we seem to have reached was to remove it from those and keep it in Contemporary Catholic liturgical music.  --Mwalimu59 (talk) 04:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposition
Talk:Aridity

message: I just did a minor tweak to the wording, as I found it pretty confusing.  Does anyone know if I took out anything technical and important?  If so, when it's added back, it might be better if written at a layman's level 'cause it looked so overly technical at first I thought it was vandalism.  Just a thought...  WLU 03:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: The previous stub has been replaced by a much longer and informative article. The stub marker has been provisionally removed. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Michel M Verstraete 23:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I left comments on your talk page, I think one improvement that could be made still would be one or more pictures.  WLU 23:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New version of article

message: Studying interwiki found Desert climate. 
How to begin merging procces? ·Carn !? 11:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article for Merge into 

message: This belongs at aridity, the noun not the adjective. 83.151.229.56 (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to aridity 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that the proposed title is preferable under WP:NOUN. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Arid →  – The IP from four years ago is right (), per WP:NOUN. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 September 2023
Talk:Air Vigilance Service

message: Since there isn't actually an air force, perhaps this should be moved to Air Surveillance Service or similar. --OGoncho 02:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Assegai

message: -John Bowser- Discovered the Information on Southern Africa in the Big Book of Battles and a Book by Grayham Worseley, Rorkes Drift ... Removed from article Htaccess (talk) 05:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No title 

message: Article is called Assegai... section called Assegai?
More like Assegais in native African culture?
75.156.69.71 (talk) 04:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing headers 

message: The intro states that the assegai is a pole weapon comparable to the roman "hasta" (and other members of the spear family) used for throwing. However, the article on the "hasta" specifically (and correctly) states that the hasta was NOT used for throwing. Anyone interested in clearing this up? Otherwise I would simply delete the hasta from the list. Koo Kee (talk) 15:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have consulted a number of dictionaries (OED, Oxford Dictionaries, Merriam Webster, American Heritage dictionary re citation in article, Wiktionary, and the Dutch language Van Dale) and I believe the link to the Latin 'hasta' may be an error on the source's part (maybe a false cognate?) I will therefore remove it entirely. Francoisdjvr (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Yara-ma-yha-who

message: My references (Vampires, Werewolves, and Demons (1979) by Lynn Myring, published by Usborne Publishing, Ltd.; article by Dr. Suzanne Hand, excerpting Australian Natural History, March 1985; Dr. Hand also refers to The Demon Book by V. Hyatt and J. W. Charles) say this creature is about three feet tall, covered in scaly red and green skin, with suckers for hands (rather than having suckers for fingers.) These references also call the creature Yara-ma or Yarama. I am not an expert, nor am I Aboriginal. Wocky 02:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red or Green?

message: A couple of years ago I put this article up for deletion, the only article I have ever put up for deletion. As penance, I have added 15 books, assuring this article will never be deleted again. 
* p. 142
* p. 26
* p. 344
* p. 305
* p. 62
* p. 13
* p. 151
* p. 99
* p. 24
* p. 254
* p. 93
* p. 94
* p. 7
* p. 160
*
* p. 404
travb (talk) 08:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol.Smallman12q (talk) 02:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unclear how these books were used to create this article. We shouldn't just have a list of every book that mentions this legend.ZayZayEM (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Penance
Talk:Robert Aldrich

message: I have removed Category:American Jews from his entry.  I will replace it if anyone can offer any documentation as to why he should be listed as such.  He came from a very prominent, well-documented family.  Even if he were of Jewish descent, which is unlikely, I could find no evidence that he practiced Judaism or converted to Judaism.
EricWR (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Jewish

message: Note: Citation and Classification maintenance review 
:Greetings, the article is listed in the category "Articles needing additional references from August 2019. That is a nice category title since the "Personal life" section sports a This section does not cite any sources tag.
:The B-class criteria #1 states; , and #4, 
:If someone would take a look at this it would be appreciated.  --  Otr500 (talk) 12:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: After a closer examination the article was reassessed to C-class. There are issues aside from those listed above. There are unsourced sentences, paragraphs, and sections (Second assistant director) that need attention.  --  Otr500 (talk) 13:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues and classification 

message: :After a closer examination the article was reassessed to C-class. There are issues aside from those listed above. There are unsourced sentences, paragraphs, and sections (Second assistant director) that need attention.  --  Otr500 (talk) 13:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification

message: Hi, one unfinished project is named "Tryanny"; could that be a typo for "Tyranny"? MVH, T 84.208.65.62 (talk) 02:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Talk:South Coast railway line, New South Wales

message: I've always wondered where the line was supposed to go before it was interrupted by the Shoalhaven River. Joestella 08:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was it going? 

message: Could somebody with the proper geographical knowledge please add a line diagramm (like here)? I was making an effort but cannot get it straight, the text is much too confusing and if at least the enumeration of the stations was in the right order. There also seem to be contradictions between the text and the enumeration. Thank you very much for your help! MichaelXXLF 10:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * There has been some consternation regarding line maps on CityRail pages- I have done a lot of the NSW country line ones and am reluctant to put time into one here for fear it will be deleted. The Fulch 12:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What kind of consternation are you referring to? MichaelXXLF 18:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: * Some users don't think they belong on CityRail pages, and have wanted them removed. An opinion I don't agree with, I must say. I'll need some consensus before I put any time into it, meaning that if no-one raises any objesctions here, I might give it a go. The Fulch 01:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This one is both a CityRail line and the name of the line as well - so there's no problem with  a diagram, so long as it isn't at the top of the page. I'm happy to do it myself. JRG 05:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Gee, thanks! :-) MichaelXXLF 10:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add a Line diagram! 
Talk:K (cider)

message: "bittersweet"?  It's less sweet than some, and not at all bitter (at least in the American version).  —Tamfang 02:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.. this isn't a great description of the flavor.  It'd be nice to have a collection of quotes by established beverage critics. 00:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  flavor 

message: BevMo stopped carrying it. Does anyone watching this happen to know of a store near San José or Berkeley (California) that sells K?  —Tamfang (talk) 06:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  boo hoo!