Talk:Hoysala architecture

message: There are a few minor issues with naming consistencies in the article. Probably all are valid transliterations, but perhaps some or all of the following spellings should be standardized within the article when not directly quoting a source or reference. If so, here's my list.
*Reference Premakumar, B.P.. Architectural marvel is also spelled Premkumar, and the source link to check is dead.
DK  linked back.Dineshkannambadi 18:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look into these issues this weekend.thanks for bringing it up.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 12:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I have fixed the broken links and made the consistancy changes to temple names. Having done this, it must be known that temples in India can often be called by slightly different pronounciations, even by historians. Thus, Kesava-Keshava and Hoysaleswara-Hoysalesvara-Hoysaleshwara are all the same. So in such cases, the best identification is the location (town/city). Even the spelling variation of Amrithapura-Amruthapura is a commonly found.thanksDineshkannambadi 18:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent work, as usual. You do raise up an interesting point which affects a number of India-based articles, as well as other article categories which frequently use transliterated text. I know that there are multiple valid spellings for many proper nouns and, further, that some spellings must vary due to direct title references, quotes, and the like. But, in your opinion is it otherwise desirable to make the spellings consistent within the article for the reader's benefit? I am not qualified to make a decision on the preferred spelling for such articles, but is consistency there worth worrying about? If not, I can ignore a lot of current FAs (and obviously a huge number of less than FA-level articles) with these type of spelling variations. But if it does matter, then consistency spelling issues are common, e.g. found even within your own list of FA articles. Michael Devore 20:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: If you find spelling inconsistancies in my FA's, please feel free to point it out on my user page and I shall rectify it. But the problem is when someone else comes along, finds my way of spelling, though consistant in the article, unacceptable and makes a few quick changes by spot checking. Then both our efforts are wasted. However, we can only do what we can do. Currently, even with spelling consistancy in the FA article, the image files may have a slightly different spelling for the temple/monument name. So long as the summary in the image file gives full details of the location etc, then it should be ok. If the image file name spelling it very different, then I will reload the file with correct spelling of the temple/monument/sculpture and delete the older version.thanksDineshkannambadi 21:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming issues

message: Does this policy, Avoid sandwiching text between two images facing each other, still applies? If so, what does the page means? Why were the two images in Temple deities section were put in such a way that the text are sandwiched? --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs)  05:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken care of this issue.thanks.Dineshkannambadi 06:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I thought its not applicable anymore. --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs)  06:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MoS issues 

message: Reminds me of Angkor Wat. Indian architecture says "Indian style Hindu and Buddhist temples were constructed abroad in ancient times, with especially noteworthy uses of this style in Cambodia's Angkor Wat, and Java's Prambanan." WAS 4.250 10:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angkor Wat 

message: I removed "distinctive" from the lead sentence since this doesn't really add much to the article and the lead should be as susinct(sp) as possible. Thanks, --Tom 18:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit lead sentence

message: It looks like there are many duplicate wiki links to the same articles? I will try to delink these. Any reason this was over looked? Anyways, congrats on feature/front page, Cheers! --Tom 18:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate links

message: How did this get featured when it's littered with POV statements like "Hoysala temples offer an excellent opportunity for pilgrims", "beautifully sculptured figures adorn the top", "a virtuoso carving style", "parapets all richly decorated". There's also a lot of unsourced "may be" and "could be considered", and "perhaps the most"s. What gives? Yeanold Viskersenn 20:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see any where "could be considred" is mentioned. It would be better if you mention which claim needs to be sourced. The article is well sourced from various reliable sources and scholars. I agree, the statements that look like POV, although well-cited, may do well with a minor copyedit. - KNM  Talk 20:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not asking for citations, I'm wondering why such POV is in the article in the first place. "excellent opportunity" and "beautiful" are not objective facts by any stretch of the imagination. Yeanold Viskersenn 20:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeanold is right. Beautiful? I see Weasel Words creeping in. "Is considered by some leading authorities on architecture to be beautiful" would be better. Cited, of course. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 18:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Dk Reply Ok. I will give this a light copy edit to remove weasel words and 
too many adjectives. Please give me a week or so to take care of this issue.ThanksDineshkannambadi 18:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality of this article

message: Transcluding  is plain daft and makes the article more difficult to edit than is necessary. Please can we convert this into a list. Then remove all the non-notable examples.
Please note that in due course I am also going to be proposing a merge of :Lesser known temples of the Hoysala Empire because the titling is entirely subjective. - Sitush (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous temples template 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hoysala architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ourkarnataka.com/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Hoysala architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ourkarnataka.com/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hoysala architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625060519/http://asibengalurucircle.org/monuments.html to http://asibengalurucircle.org/monuments.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hoysala architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060614044346/http://chitralakshana.com/articles/UB%20githa/hoysala.htm to http://www.chitralakshana.com/articles/UB%20githa/hoysala.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hoysala architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://asibengalurucircle.org/hassan-8.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029212127/http://asibengalurucircle.org/shimoga-17.html to http://asibengalurucircle.org/shimoga-17.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150502190310/http://asibengalurucircle.org/mandya-3.html to http://asibengalurucircle.org/mandya-3.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hoysala architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007194352/http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/aug92005/spectrum92548200588.asp to http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/aug92005/spectrum92548200588.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141214010904/http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/jan252005/spt7.asp to http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/jan252005/spt7.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007194352/http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/aug92005/spectrum92548200588.asp to http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/aug92005/spectrum92548200588.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120611035817/http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/jan202004/spt6.asp to http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/jan202004/spt6.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified