lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rocky DeSantos

message: Rocky didn't appear in Forever Red because he had the same powers as Jason. Presumably when he injured his back, he gave Jason his old morpher, which was used in the same way as Adam's was in Power Rangers In Space. This explanation would still mean Jason couldn't morph during the Turbo movie. Digifiend 13:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: If DeSantos is not canon, shouldn't this be at Rocky (Power Rangers)?  What would Ryulong do? Hbdragon88 08:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: The trivia section has two different explanations of why Rocky was not in Forever Red. I quote verbatim: 
*Rocky was the only Red Ranger to not be included in the Power Rangers: Wild Force episode Forever Red. Steve Cardenas was asked to be the Red Ninja Ranger that he portrayed in the third season of Power Rangers but declined due to being up to personal business in Philadelphia. 
*Rocky did not appear in the Red Ranger special Forever Red  in Power Rangers: Wild Force , and was the only Red Ranger not to do so.  Cardenas, who has moved on from acting, was unable to be reached for the episode.  Another holdout, Danny Slavin, was eventually convinced to return as a personal favor, and was added digitally to the episode.
Can someone who knows more than I do please fix this? SpectrumDT 23:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just remove it.  Other people have said that he woudln't have fit, as Jason was there and Jason transferred his powers to Rocky, and that they had the same outfit. Hbdragon88 04:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the real reason Rocky was not in Forever Red? 

message: He opened a dojo after quitting the ranger team - but Adam is running one in Once a Ranger - either they're competing or he took it over from Rocky! Digifiend (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dojo
Talk:Complete 'B' Sides

message: I'm bogged down in my attempts to confirm an extract from "Make Believe," a song on this Album.  Google came up empty when I attempted to locate the Publisher for this song—a major peeve I have concerning the limited online data about composers and publishers of many songs on the pop, rock, metal and alternative markets.  Who published the various songs on "The Complete 'B' Sides"? - B.C.Schmerker 00:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal information
Talk:Plethysmograph

message: Plethysmograph is a song by Disciples of Annihilation on Scream of the Waking Neighbors cd.  It was recorded with Jello Biafra.--McDogm 04:28, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Song

message: Someone should register the page "Pleth" and have it redirect to this one. Took me some looking on google to figure out that pleth was this.70.225.160.44 17:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. ssepp(talk) 18:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect pleth 

message: I know air displacement plethysmography is at the heart of the BodPod, used to assess %bodyfat by outfits like the NFL and the Clinical Nutrition Research Center ...--Billymac00 (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body Composition 

message: I can't understand why these are separate pages.  Optoelectronic plethysmography is barely a stub.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: What is the pressure change in PSI/KPa or altitude/depth?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.231.231 (talk) 02:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: It should be pointed out that plethysmographs need to be calibrated for the volume of the individual inside them, often using a calibration syringe to change the volume of the apparatus by a known quantity with the person inside, and then use the detected pressure change to calculated the starting volume.
I'm struggling to find a citation for this - I will leave that for more practiced individuals - but it's obvious if you think about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.242.185 (talk) 13:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calibration
Talk:Pierre Gringore

message: * Nuttall lists dates as (1476-1544), but Nuttall isn't that reliable of a source, so... Womble 19:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth/Death dates

message: Is this person called Gringore or Gringoire, and are they alternative names, and who uses each?Zargulon (talk) 18:59, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:General Instrument

message: The name of the company was "General Instrument" (singular).  121a0012 04:45, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company name 

message: Please do not state that a merger or acquisition is a fact unless it is final.  The Arris deal may complete by the end of Q2-2013. Bobsd (talk) 23:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergers 
Talk:Stibine

message: Under toxicology the word haemoglobin is used indtead of hemeoglobin.  Is that an error, or some British spelling?  I think it should be changed.
*
*
*
-some references--Stone 16:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no such word as "hemeoglobin". The spelling used, is indeed the non-American version. Plasmic Physics (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: haemoglobin
Talk:Freak Magnet

message: I have no idea what is meant by "original track listing." If someone doesn't explain, I will remove it. -Freekee 14:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original track listing 

message: Not in the original bargain, right? The whole crucifix steeped in the blood of the virgin American feminist warrior thing. The whole I feel my pain and everyone else's suffering for Our Lord's sake and the sake of art with a capital A. Day to day it gets hard to bare. Like pushing somebody's wheelchair all day while listening to their endless jabberwocky stream of consciousness philosophical free association bullshit. Tiresome is what it is. You wonder why you signed up for it originally and you can't think back why. Hell, you can't think. You just want to sleep. And how many years are left -- how many are left of this? Is this the way to spend it, nurse-maiding a freak magnet? 69.165.54.95 (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not in the bargain
Talk:Moors (race)

message: This is one sloppy, and slightly misinformed, article, I must say.
I know it is tricky dealing is race and color, and I think where this article may go wrong is in thinking of races as discrete, originally unrelated populations, when genetics shows more of a gradient in the frequency of genetic markers.  If one is to discuss Moors as Berbers, yet say that most are "mulatto," one really is discussing Berbers.  Berbers may be defined linguistically, in which case a wide variety of skin tones exist, with the lighter skin tones existing farther north and darker ones farther south.  One should, of course, discuss the genetic contribution of 'black' slaves to Berber populations.
69.111.165.246 05:08, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Moors (race?) If Moor is about the people, then why is there a "Moors (race)" article? That's self-contradictory. The latter is a stub anyway, so merge the content. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 20:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Caffeinism

message: Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I don't see a problem with this article, in terms of POV or lack of evidence/external support. Except, it is my understanding that Caffeinism is a slang term refering to caffeine addiction. If I am correct, then should this page not simply re-direct to Caffeine or Drug addiction? Since caffeine addiction in itself is not important enough to warrant its own page (unlike alcoholism). Moreover, there is no information on this page that isn't contained on both of the previously mentioned pages. So, unless someone disagrees, I will put in a motion to merge with Caffeine. --User:carbonrodney 01:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll back -anything- to stop there being a page at this name. Redirection to the addiction section of the caffeine article would probably be the best idea - like what caffeine addiction does right now. --Kiand 01:30, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a case of un-Wikipedia-like format? 

message: See subject ^
:I'd support deletion (again, I nominated it in the first place), wiktionary or not. --Kiand 22:56, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Under a purely neologistic title, at that. Caffeine intoxication, maybe Caffeine poisoning.... --Kiand 23:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support a move to a better title.  Which one is most appropriate? - Tεxτurε 23:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote for caffeine posioning, ideally without a redirect from this title, but I doubt that bit'll be accepted... --Kiand 00:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Caffeine poisoning does seem to be the preferred term these days. --Viriditas 03:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Any opposed? - Tεxτurε 15:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I would not agree with a transwiki. There is such a thing as caffeine poisoning, but this can be merged with caffeine#Toxicity without all the pseudoscientific waffle about it causing all ills of mankind. JFW | T@lk 16:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you'd like to try the merge we can make this a redirect. - Tεxτurε 16:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I support a redirect, only because I don't think this article can be expanded in any useful way. --Viriditas 04:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Last time I suggested that I got shot down, but I'd also back it being done. This article is pseudoscience, a neologism, and only got past VfD because the same neologism was used to refer to something else and 99.5% of VfD voters don't go past a google test. --Kiand 16:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text: It can be merged with caffeine#toxicity. JFW | T@lk 23:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move some of article to Wiktionary, then delete?
Talk:List of heritage-listed buildings in Melbourne

message: Great to see this list, however I think the title could be improved. On the Victorian Heritage List are many places which are not buildings. You have included other structures in the list to include bridges, but this also does not go far enough. There are a number of Wurundjeri aboriginal sites on the heritage list, as well as many of the historic public parks contained in :Category: Melbourne parks and gardens, just to give two broad categories. I suggest this article is redirected to Heritage sites in Melbourne, which would be much more accurate.--Takver 05:42, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NiNa

message: Note: I find the only mirror of this page located at nina.biography.ms/ - biography lifted from Wikipedia and has not complied with the terms of our GFDL.  Please don't confuse them for the original creators. Lotsofissues 06:09, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mirro

message: I think a disambiguation page is needed for "nina" - currently it redirects here. Should also contain a list of people named "Nina". Is there any topic named "Nina" that is very closely connected with it, or should "Nina" directly show the disambiguation page? Peter S. 22:42, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No moving is needed, just fix the redirect. This band is called NiNa with a second capital 'N' and since wiki is case sensative, you could disambig 'nina' or 'Nina' once the redirect is removed. -- NatsukiGirl\talk 22:55, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: there's nothing connected to 'Nina' very closely that I know of... a disambig would be great, there are lots of things that could go there. This band, famous women named Nina, the spanish word nina, and ship called Nina... etc -- NatsukiGirl\talk 22:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, I'll do it. (btw: fast response :-D) Peter S. 23:02, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, done. Enjoy :-) Peter S. 23:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Beautiful. :D -- NatsukiGirl\talk 00:37, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page for "Nina" needed, any topic most fitting?
Template talk:JargonFile

message: Whether all versions of the Jargon File are in the public domains depends on what you definition of "version of the Jargon File" is. Someone did turn it into a book, and the book version is copyrighted. Other forks of the jargon file might also be non-public domain. Noel (talk) 06:18, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So if one grabbed a copy of AIWORD.RF[UP,DOC] from SAIL before the shutdown, are you implying by omission that it is PD?  18.26.0.18 23:09, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Line drawing algorithm

message: Moved from article text:
:(Todo: describe naïve algorithm, i.e. dx/dy * t ...)
Someone should translate the German article. It's much much better.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.91.117.9 (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

message: I made some small changes. Might do more in the future. Wqwt (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated from German version
Talk:Don Siegel

message: I am writing an essay about McCarthyism and wanted to analyse Siegel's "Invasion of the body snatchers" in this context.
Generally talked about as a polemic against McCarthyism, Siegel's later career seems to suggest that he was quite a right-wing director and would have supported efforts against communism.
Any comments on this ? Help would be greatly appreciated. I can also be reached at mikelogan@despammed.com
M.L.
:The film page quotes Kevin McCarthy as saying no allegory was intended. It may be that like his protege Eastwood, Siegel did not intend political commentary. -- Beardo 07:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Essay
Talk:List of aircraft of the Irish Air Corps

message: I think you may need to update your list - many of the aircraft listed have not been used by the Irish air corps since the 1960's! (comment added on 2005-05-11 06:51:27 by User:203.11.225.5).
:hmm, although it's reassuring that a squadron of Spitfires has kept us safe from Marshall Stalin for fifty years. --die Baumfabrik 17:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't seem anyone has been maintaining this recently. In any case, I've performed a major update and cleanup. Askari Mark | Talk 00:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 edits

message: Recent changes (on this page and elsewhere) were made to remove the listing for the Gulfstream IV aircraft. While I had noted and reverted the change on the basis that it wasn't supported by cite, I subsequently did (after a fashion) found at least one very recent source. While we might like to see at least one other verifiable source on this (and ideally an official one - if such a thing is possible), do we think this is sufficient to warrant updating the list here? To add the Gulstream to the "retired" category - and remove it from the template. Guliolopez (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That source seems satisfactory - FOX 52 (talk) 22:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

text: Link to the Gulfstream on the Air Corps has been removed: www.military.ie/air-corps/fleet/gulfstream-iv/ - Finestat (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulfstream retirement
Talk:George Osborne

message: Consider linking grandfather in Early life to the person in question - Sir George Francis Osborne, 16th Baronet (I don't think this is linked before)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.59.143 (talk) 21:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link? 

message: I propose that section George Osborne#Chancellor of the Exchequer (2010–2016) be split into a separate page called George Osborne's tenure as Chancellor of the Exchequer. The section is currently 50,190 bytes which is over the recommended amount. Similar articles exist (see :Category:Tenures in political office by individual) for long tenures such as Jeremy Hunt's tenure as Health Secretary, Iain Duncan Smith's tenure as Work and Pensions Secretary and Theresa May's tenure as Home Secretary (which were all also 6 years). If split, the article could go into more depth and would not take up as much space on his page. Sahaib (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging some editors (per WP:Splitting#Step 1: Create a discussion), , , , , , , . Sahaib (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sahaib Thanks for this. Seems like a good idea to me. When I split the Hunt and Duncan Smith articles, those splits were in response to a couple of long-standing templates but this idea for Osborne seems prudent given the overwhelming length of the section. Alex (talk) 14:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with this. JLo-Watson (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal 

message: Could you add the anchor "Confettigate" before "In April 2021" please? 90.202.89.123 (talk) 22:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2023 

message: Change the wording on of the opening paragraph from "is a British former politician" to "is a former British politician" to improve readability 94.175.92.46 (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2023
Talk:Semiotic democracy

message: Better reference?
"Semiotic democracy and its broader relation, cultural democracy, are values that respect an audience’s (or a citizenry’s) rights and abilities to manipulate, comment on, criticize, and play with the signs that their culture makes available (Fiske 1987, Gans 1999, Doss
1995)." in Vaidyanathan, Siva. (2006). “Afterword—Critical Information Studies: A Bibliographic Manifesto” Cultural Studies 20(2/3) in "The Politics of Intellectual Properties" edited by Ted Striphas & Kembrew McLeod.
--  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geph (talk • contribs) 06:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

message: Article cites no sources Bobkeyes (talk) 23:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations?
Talk:Tzimtzum

message: Hi IZAK,  Nice edits to the article. Just one thing: The phrase "in the Kabbalah of Judaism" appears to be meaningless - which other religion has a Kabbalah? Therefore I intend to revert to earlier opening phrase. 
Fintor 07:50, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He probably meant to exclude all the junk which is flying around the web these days. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 15:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am all in favour - because, after all, what else could "tzimtzum" be refering to? Fintor 16:01, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Probably it is done so to conform the NPOV policy, but there is a wording inconsistency in the article: I the first part, "God" is written out in full, while in the second part, it is abbreviated as "G-d". It might be a good idea to make the wording consistent, but we must make sure, that it neiter breaks the NPOV policy nor is unsuitable for the religious people. I suggest revising the wording to be "Lord", an acceptable alternative that doesn't result in an iconsistent wording across the article. --NetRolller 3D 13:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be inaccurate.  When dealing with translations of Hebrew religious texts, "Lord" is a translation either of the four-letter name or a word that actually means lord, such as "baal".  Further, when the word "God" (big 'g') is used, it is a translation of one of the many Hebrew words that refer specifically to the Israelite deity.  Further, the alternative "Lord" is generally modified to "L-rd" by pious Jews for the same reason "God" is modified to "G-d".  Essentially, the reasoning is to prevent the desecration of any of His names.  My understanding is that if a pious Jew were to edit this page using the version "God", and another person were to print it out and the print-out were destroyed, whether intentionally or accidentally, the Jew would be partially responsible for desecration of the divine name.  Whether this is or is not something that should be considered when editing a Wikipedia article is beyond my knowledge of Wikipedia. Josterhage (talk) 05:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

text: The first section and any other sections that show favor for religious standards of teaching over free knowledge need to go. This is Wikipedia, non-religious, non-partisan, non-biased. Among other things, all the uses in this article of "G-d" need to be replace with "God" (the use of "G-d" is a religious preference, and has no place here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.214.176 (talk) 20:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording inconsistency 

message: Shorten per WP:SDSHORT. Editor2020 (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description
Talk:Generalized System of Preferences

message: what about the EU GSP regime? Also there are GSP+, etc... Alinor 07:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GSP from the EU prespective 
Wikipedia talk:Category deletion

message: This is really a documentation page on the fairly uncontroversial process of category deletions; there is no need to have this as a policy or even as a guideline. It's already dependent on the deletion policy, speedy deletion policy, which covers all policy aspects, and on the deletion process guideline. Actually, the content is largely redundant and could be merged in the Wikipedia:Categories for discussion page and its Admin instructions subpage. We don't have a files for deletion policy or similar for other namespaces, and I don't see the need for categories. Cenarium (talk) 11:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If someone were to do this seriously, like an offical Help:Merge#Selective_paste_merger, copying or otherwise implementing there what is usefull or well formulated here, then that would be fine with me. Debresser (talk) 07:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

text: If all the important information has been moved over to there, then certainly, it makes sense to turn this redundant page into a redirect.--Kotniski (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll be more explicit. I see a lot of crap here. Things that are nowhere to be found in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion and that I for one would not want to be found there. Debresser (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Two days? It was about three weeks.--Kotniski (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

text: The policy exists elsewhere, so removing the tag isn't a substantive policy change. If you take the time to consider the proposal, and come up with an objection (for example, finding something in this page that is not already described elsewhere), then bring it up and we can restore the tag.    M   22:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move to [[Wikipedia:Category deletion]] and demote from policy status or merge altogether
Talk:James Elphinston

message: The Robert Charles Dallas who wrote the obit in the Gentleman's Magazine was probably the writer who lived from 1754 to 1824. Thanks for pointing it out - it looks from the ODNB entry that he might have been the brother of Alexander Dallas the US Treasury secretary, and this is confirmed by the entry on Alexander Robert Charles Dallas. --Matthew Kilburn 08:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note there were two Alexander James Dallases--the Treas. Sec., and his son. Waterguy 01:34, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Schizophrenia (Sepultura album)

message: Sepultura's vast improvement from Morbid Visions to Schizophrenia also reflected a trend in the late-1980s extreme metal scene: it's musicians improved in technical profficiency and songwriting, and their home labels invested more in better production values. Musicaindustrial (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Ideas
Talk:Galton and Simpson

message: Interesting that the reference to Hancock's move to ITV has been removed as the cause of his split with G&S. Was this not the case? Lots of extra new information in this article - good work! Rayray 08:38, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Talk:Alan K. Simpson In ictu oculi (talk) 07:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Related move discussion