Talk:Development of the New Testament canon

message: Before edits by user 174.28.120.116 today, there were three uses of CE and two of AD in dates in the body of this article.  The IP user changed two of the CEs to ADs, so now it's 4 ADs and one CE.  I really have little opinion on which way this should go, but it would be best to be consistent.  I was bold and changed the last CE to AD.  Rwessel (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I support AD since this is based on the New Testament only. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

text: This article was created using . It probably came from somewhere else, but in any case I'm for using  as terser, less pointy, and the common English format. — LlywelynII 15:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE vs AD 

message: This article may have started from a crib of the EB 11 article, which was a gutting of the much more thorough EB 9 article:
* .
* .
There's obviously more modern scholarship, but there might be lines that were simply copied that should be attributed and the EB 9 article is a good source for the traditional views in the 19th century, based on the surviving textual resources. See also the EB 11's article on the Bible, which has detailed sections on the canon:
* .
 — LlywelynII 14:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for future article expansion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Development of the New Testament canon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080322080915/http://www.wels.net/sab/qa/luther-03.html to http://www.wels.net/sab/qa/luther-03.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419071230/http://www.bibelcenter.de/bibel/lu1545/ to http://www.bibelcenter.de/bibel/lu1545/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  02:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: In the lead, Polycarp's name appears between two full-stops without any further explanation. That makes little sense. Unless someone can clarify why the name is mentioned, it should be deleted. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no-one has reacted, I have boldly removed the word. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polycarp