lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Local 33–UNITE HERE

message: In the paragraph discussing the vote in april 2003, it is clear from both articles cited, NYT reference "Grad Students Reject Union In Yale Vote," and YDN reference "Graduate Students Vote Down Unionization," that this vote was controversial. Neither one of these pieces is an opinion article, both were written by reporters. I agree that the word 'highly' can be removed. Acerjan 17:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins and history

message: Two of the references lead to dead links. Acerjan 17:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Actions

message: The use of college papers as the main sources throughout this article is a big problem. The recent revert is sourced to an opinion piece in a college paper—not known to be reliable for statements of fact. The college papers need to be scrapped for reliable sources—national and local papers, even self-published "official" sources, not college opinion pieces. – czar 18:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In general I agree, but I'm not sure what is different about an opinion article in a college paper versus an opinion article in a local newspaper. Around a year ago I went looking for references that met this criteria, and was only able to find a single short article from the NYT that supported any of the 2003-2005 history of GESO, which I then included in the references (currently Ref. 12), but it only discusses the events of 2003. In the absence of using an opinion piece from the college newspaper, there is no reference to prove that the vote in 2005 occurred. However, if the 2005 vote is mentioned here, I do not think it is appropriate to omit the suspect circumstances of that vote contained within the same reference. Acerjan 19:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is better to make no claim or to say nothing about it unless we can find a reliable source or official self-published source to say it. The YDN's publishing criteria pale in comparison to the NYT's. – czar 19:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources 
Talk:Paul Doumer

message: The dates in the article are 1902 - 1905, but at the side, the dates are 1905 - 1906.    69.76.177.72 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  President of Chamber of Deputies 

message: The current version says he died on May 7 and (in this recent uncited change) his term ended on May 6 (the day he was shot), which would be unusual. French Wikipedia puts both on May 7. Latest Britannica article has May 6 for his death. I don't know where to go for a definitive cite. David Brooks (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death and term end
Talk:Batá drum

message: There is something strange about this article that I can't quite put my finger on, a feel of POV that might be clarified by reference to its sources perhaps. Andrewa (talk) 18:16, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Style and sources

message: There is a redirect for "Amele" to this page. This page does not mention "Amele". There is a language Amele language, the term "Amele" should allow a reader to go to that page, not this one. Brunswicknic (talk) 02:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor redirection
Talk:KFJX

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:KFTA-TV

message: The former Ft. Smith studio on Kelly ave. is now a field office for the Department of Homeland Security. However, I do believe KFTA has a new office for FS in neighboring Van Buren. Can anyone confirm?Bjoh249 (talk) 23:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer any office for station in Ft. Smith
Talk:Yale Kamisar

message: Note, there is an error on the bio on Yale Kamisar.
 
The first paragraph in the personal life of Yale Kamisar should read:
   Kamisar was married to Joan Russell until  his death. Yale had three sons David, Gordon and Jonathan with his first wife Dr. Esther Englander Kamisar who is still living.  Yale also has 4 grandchildren Ben, Mia, Jennifer and Nicholas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.40.56 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a citation to support this addition? I support the addition of this information, but only if we have a source to support what is being suggested. Jurisdicta (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Jurisdicta: The Biography section / landing page of reference 5 of the article (Yale Kamisar papers: 1955-2010) seems to be a valid source for the disambiguation about his marriages & children; it doesn't mention his grandchildren, however. sherpajack (talk ) 20:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you sherpajack, I made the edit per your suggestion and cited to the source you provided. Jurisdicta (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected Yale Kamisar Info in personal life
Talk:KFYR-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:Paul MacEwan

message: I have removed the following paragraph from the text, as it is clearly polemical (I make no claim in regards to its accuracy, but it is clearly not NPOV):
Concerning the claims of the Wikipedia article on the Cape Breton Labor Party, stating that the party's main purpose was to seek provincial status for Cape Breton Island, MacEwan states on February 15, 2007, that this is not correct. "It was frequently claimed by the new leader of the NDP, Alexa McDonough, that we were some kind of separatists, but in reviewing the news clippings of 1984, the only election the Labor Party ever partcipated in, I find no mention of this at all," MacEwan states. "The reason the Labor Party was founded was to fight for free speech, and to stand for the values formerly supported by the NDP in Nova Scotia prior to McDonough's ascendancy. After the Labor Party was wound down, I was admitted to the Nova Scotia Liberal Party and served as a Liberal MLA for thirteen years. I doubt this would have been possible had I been viewed as some kind of an irreconcilable separatist."SteveMtl 15:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abukuma Express Line

message: There is an error in the article.
It states: "The line was operated as an alternate route by Japanese National Railways until 1986".
The line was for sure intended to be an alternate route, but was never finished. JNR built only the section Tsukinoki - Marumori.
The remaining part, Marumori - Fukushima, was completed by AbukumaExpress in 1988. Hence, it can never has been used as an alternate route during the JNR period.
However, the history section in the article AbukumaExpress (about the company) is correct.
In most cases, when a Japanese railway company runs only one line, there is only one joint Wikipedia article in English, as much of the information is overlapping.
Should the two articles be merged or shall this one be updated?
Kitayama (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for highlighting the error. I have expanded the history details of both this and the Abukuma Express article with a reference to clarify the opening dates of the various sections. I don't see any need to merge the line article with the operator article, though. --DAJF (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article error
Talk:Taurus PT92

message: Just a note: Self-sourcing, subjective comments regarding the performance or quality of a product should be avoided. If this opinion is shared by a significant number of people, if this were documented, and if it were important enough, it could be mentioned. MaxBrains 21:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I used to live just two kilometers from the Taurus factory when I studied. I have some photos (self taken by me) of this. I can scan and upload, for donate via the public domain license, if anyone wants for this article.  Pernambuco 13:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Is there any way to add a picture without it being removed my some overzealous user? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CipherZero (talk • contribs) 04:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of the PT-92 

message: is it really a good idea that this site is included? it offers no original content, they don't own the right to the photos on there, they were "found", and it's just packed with ads. if it wasn't for the one paragraph on the front page it'd just be a spam site.
: after looking into other changes by the same IP, there were more than a few sites that were accessory sales and spam that are now removed. Fugi187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 

message: Is it made in Miami, USA or Brazil?
It's imported to Taurus in Miami from Brazil.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.96.104.211 (talk) 06:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does the PT92 have Miami, FL writen on it's right side? 

message: No mention o fthe fact that Pt92s have a frame mounted safety? It's one of the easiest ways to tell them from the original berettas..... Kerdajan (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety location 

message: I just wanted to flag that while the PIRA would probably argue that they represent the Irish state this way of linking gives a very misleading representation of the relationship here. While the “users” links on other weapons pages do tend to direct to the state page of the country where the weapon is used by an official military/law enforcement agency I don’t think it’s appropriate in this case. A direction to the PIRA’s page would be more appropriate and lead to fewer misunderstandings. 
I didn’t want to just go ahead and make the change if there is a fixed convention I’m just not aware of but if there isn’t I feel this should be addressed. 2A02:C7C:6E39:3D00:346C:EBE2:2524:3548 (talk) 15:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Users” link to the Provisional IRA links to the page for the county or Ireland, not the organisation
Talk:KIEM-TV

message: A user has, several times, asserted that this station is broadcasting in HD. Please provide a citation to verify this fact. I would recommend that the references to HD be removed unless the user can provide verification of this assertion. There is a difference between broadcasting a digital signal and broadcasting a high definition picture on said digital signal. Please do not confuse the two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmking (talk • contribs) 20:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about whether this station is truly broadcasting HD content

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 15:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:Sara Payne: A Mother's Story

message: This is not an enclyclopaedic style article.  It is full of narrative and reads like a school essay or a book report.  The narrative style could even have been copied from elsewhere.
Please can someone pick this up and wikify and clean it up.  Fiddle Faddle 21:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have attempted to do some cleanup work on this. It needs to be pared down drastically, but I've never read the book so I don't feel comfortable editing anything out or writing a new synopsis. I added categories and the novel infobox and did a bit of organizational edting, but it still needs loads of work. --Lendorien 21:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality 

message: I don't really see this book as deserving of its own article, although the murder and the author are notable, the article doesn't' explain the significance of this book in itself. We already have an article about the murder of Sarah Payne, not to mention an article about the author and the Sarah's Law article. Perhaps there's missing content about notability not yet included in the article, but as it stands surely any material of value can be merged into the three articles above?--Shakehandsman (talk) 18:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Yechezkel Levenstein

message: :Category:Ponevezh yeshiva is probably inappropriate. That yeshiva seems to be one of several headed by Levenstein, and the article gives no indication of a special connection (actually it doesn't even mention it). If all of the yeshivas led by him had categories, adding them all would probably be overcategorization, and the current state looks arbitrary. Due to his close connection to the Mir yeshiva, :Category:Mir yeshiva might be appropriate if it existed, but I doubt any others are. Thoughts? --Huon (talk) 14:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Hastings, Nebraska

message: I remember no news articles that would inplicate the "farmers in the area" If such an inflamitory statement is to be made a citation is certainly required
How about a mention of the famous automotive products made here (oil filters, oil additives, and the like)? Does someone have a good reference? It's hard to cite the side of an oil filter box!! Rlquall 21:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Judge Rader notable? JDAWiseman (talk) 14:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He is.  And there's a good reference for him here -> .  Do you know how to add him to the notable people list?  Cheers.  Richard Apple (talk) 14:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People 
Talk:Paul Xuereb

message: His time as Acting President was admittedly brief, but he did something.  Also need to know why country needed an  acting  President -- gov't crisis, maybe?  What did he do after his time as President was up, but before he died and was immortalised with a statue?  75.216.55.150 (talk) 22:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidential & post-presidential career? 

message: Hi, I think you should only use the "status" string for officeholders who are currently in the position. For a normal officeholder who is currently is office it is the "Incumbent". He has not been Acting President for years and by the way it does not look good in the article either. It just feels out of place. So in short, only use the "status" string for officeholder who are "currently" in the office. 188.149.157.0 (talk) 09:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I do not thing you should use the "status" string here
Talk:Paull Shin

message: The unsourced claim that Mr. Shin is a neighbor of Bill Gates seems improbable.  Mr. Shin represents and therefore presumably lives in the 21st District of Washington which is entirely in Snohomish County and west of Lake Washington, while Mr. Gates famously built his home on the east shore of Lake Washington in King County.  Some clarification is needed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Temistopol (talk • contribs) 00:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KMOT

message: The article originally said that KUMV was carried in Saskatchewan via cable beginning in the late 1960s. This is incorrect; cable programming in Saskatchewan did not begin until 1977-78 (gradual roll out) at which point KUMV was included in the package. 68.146.81.123 (talk) 15:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected error
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Master Chief 117

message: Total edits	33
Main:	0
Talk:	0
User:	30
User talk:	3
Wikipedia:	0
Wikipedia talk:	0
Image:	0
Image talk:	0
Mediawiki:	0
Mediawiki talk:	0
Template:	0
Template talk:	0
Help:	0
Help talk:	0
Category:	0
Category talk:	0
Portal:	0
Portal talk:	0
--Danny Phantom [ Phantom...] 21:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:KOAM-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 02:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Are independence usd446 closed today due to the weather  LauraWalsh (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weather related school closings in southeast ks
Talk:KOBI (TV)

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Now that we're two years post digital transition, I am curious as to how VHF-lo stations such as KOBI are doing reception wise. I've heard that VHF-lo stations are generally harder to pick up, and with only ~6kw of power, I am wondering how easy/difficult it is to receive this station in the general advertised area?
Just curious. --ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 02:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception question 

message: This section seems to be out of date as I cannot find any instance of this program in current listings. Can someone who knows about its status please update the section? 1980fast (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Challenge quiz bowl section 