lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Independent Subway System

message: I was just wondering if there's a particular reason why the 63rd Street Tunnel isn't included under "East River Crossings." I understand the 63rd Street Line is included elsewhere, but I'd think the tunnel itself belongs with the crossings. I would have just changed it, but I wanted to see first if there was a reason I just wasn't thinking of.Mjj237 16:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you mean. The 63rd Street Tunnel article clearly shows that it is an East River crossing, and it is categorized as such. Marc Shepherd 16:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  63 Street Tunnel 

message: These numbers were used during construction. --NE2 19:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Route numbers
Talk:Acts of the Kings of Israel

message: Article contains no sources or verification.  Furthermore, the contention that this is a "lost book of the Old Testament" would denote that at one point this book was part of the Old Testament or Talmud.  
This is not supported by any scholarly or archaeological evidence.--Isotope23 17:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 
Talk:New York and Ottawa Railway

message: I am in the process this week to change the entry for the New York & Ottawa Ry (week of July 16th, 2006).  I have researched this particular rail line for years, had family members that worked on it and I have partnered up with a couple of fellows whom also study this line.  With our combined research, the proper history and stats will be inserted. --Bonfire00 10:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Andre Lucas

message: I created this article because the lack of it was causing a dreaded red link in another article I created. Crockspot 17:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just figuring out how to add categories, but JennyRad beat me to it. Thank you Jenny, you are Rad. Crockspot 18:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Chronicles of the Kings of Media and Persia

message: Article contains no sources or verification.  Furthermore, the contention that this is a "lost book of the Old Testament" would denote that at one point this book was part of the Old Testament or Talmud.  
This is not supported by any scholarly or archaeological evidence.--Isotope23 17:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Symphonaire Infernus et Spera Empyrium

message: Does anyone know what the translation of the Latin title is? I think it might be "Infernal symphony and the spheres of heaven" but my Latin isn't that good.
It means "On the lower side and Hopes:"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallenShadow01 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title?
Talk:Chi Coltrane

message: I believe that she is NOT related to legendary jazz trumpeter John Coltrane. This should be mentioned if someone can verify it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.238.244 (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I have seen sources (all European) list her birth year as 1942. Any idea if this is correct?2601:241:8D81:BBF0:BD10:F389:4F6B:488E (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Year
Talk:Rutland Railway

message: There's an slight edge to the tone of some of the text here.  Are phrases such as, "The strike was brought on by the employees' unwillingness..." and, "If the Rutland local unions had been more flexible they would saved their jobs and their employer's business" appropriate?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.43.201 (talk) 22:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your removal. This is certainly something to write about, but not in the way that Alco83 did. --NE2 04:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Problem? 

message: I might not have the books right in-front of me but i somehow dough this was ever a Class I railroad, anyone else agree? 
If so the category should be removed. --Alex at kms (talk) 05:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Class I railroads]]?
Talk:Chronicles of King Ahasuerus

message: Article contains no sources or verification.  Furthermore, the contention that this is a "lost book of the Old Testament" would denote that at one point this book was part of the Old Testament or Talmud.  
This is not supported by any scholarly or archaeological evidence.--Isotope23 17:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that JChap2007 changed the article in such a way that my accuracy tag is no longer necessary.  Sourcing still needs to be provided.--Isotope23 18:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Defence Housing Authority, Karachi

message: Done..  -RJFerret 04:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: Rules 39.44.207.10 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar system
Talk:Saratoga, Mount McGregor and Lake George Railroad

message: Sources identify the railroad as narrow-gauge and the Ampere as standard-gauge.  They also say the test was 1.5 miles out of the 12 mile line.  I can only conclude that this was a test stretch of track purpose-built for the Ampere, but no one explicitly says this.  I gloss over the conflict in the article. Peter Flass (talk) 21:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that also.  Street and Electric Railways identifies the railroad as narrow gauge, but doesn't call out the Ampere as standard gauge. It does say that a central rail was used for power distribution. Perhaps that was only built for 1.5 miles? RussNelson (talk) 02:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources seem pretty clear that the road was and remained 3ft gauge; Bianculli is something of an outlier. Mackensen (talk) 00:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ampere
Talk:Toronto, Hamilton and Buffalo Railway

message: According to the Forgotten Buffalo Retro Rewind, Buffalo Central Terminal 1964 & 1970 video slideshow of photos taken in 1964 and 1970 by Robert Long and posted to youtube last summer, the TH&B served Buffalo Central Terminal when the terminal was operating as a New York Central Railroad station.  The TH&B name appears on departures signs still posted within the terminal.  According to "records" uncovered at Buffalo Central Terminal (BCT) in 1990 both the TH&B and the Lehigh Valley Railroad operated out of BCT.  According to Garnet R. Cousins writing in the October 1985 issue of Trains the TH&B was already using the Exchange Street Station in Buffalo, New York when the grand opening of the BCT was held on 22 June 1929. Cousins went on to mention that a newly rebuilt Exchange Street Station in downtown Buffalo "was opened August 2, 1952, when Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo train 372 arrived from Toronto at 12:59 p.m., with 10 cars in charge of an almost-new Canadian Pacific 4-6-2."  Cousins also wrote that TH&B service to BCT was made and historically "An era passed on March 23, 1954, with the departure of the last regularly scheduled steam passenger train at the Terminal, Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo train 377 behind 4-6-4 No.501."  While it may be accurate to state that as an independent company the Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo might not have managed to reach either Buffalo, New York or Toronto, Ontario; it is probably more helpful to point out that, at least as a New York Central subsidiary (which it was from 1895 onward), the TH&B did provide service to both the cities of Buffalo and Toronto. 69.115.42.244 (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: OK this statement is buried well into the first section: "It never built into Toronto or Buffalo, but used its parent companies' trackage to reach the two cities."  Perhaps the lead should be reworded. 69.115.42.244 (talk) 16:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lead reads: "It never reached the other two cities in its name" which is not true and contradicted within the article.  It reached both Toronto and Buffalo, at least when it was a subsidiary of CPR and NYC.  Perhaps: "It never built lines into the other two cities in its own name while an independent company but later, as a subsidiary of other companies, it did provide service to both other cities for several decades in the 20th century." instead. 69.115.42.244 (talk) 17:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service to Buffalo Central Terminal 

message: No, it is not built in the international style.  The entire station building inside and out is a wonderful example of art deco design.  I have photos i took myself of the interior.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alp46a (talk • contribs) 09:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TH&B hamilton station building international style?
Talk:Troy and Greenfield Railroad

message: I have a bare-bones station list hidden in the article;
===Station list===
*Troy, New York
*Melrose, New York
*Valley Falls, New York
*Johnsonville, New York
*Buskirk, New York
*Eagle Bridge, New York A picture of it can be found here
*Hoosick Junction, New York
*Hoosick Falls, New York
*Hoosick, New York
*Petersburg Junction, New York
*Pownal, Vermont
*Williamstwon, Massachusetts
*North Adams, Massachusetts
*Hoosac Tunnel
*Hoosac Tunnel Station
*Charlemont, Massachusetts
*Buckland, Massachusetts
*Shelburne Falls, Massachusetts
*Greenfield, Massachusetts
Anybody have a clue of what I did right or wrong? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential station list 

message: *Troy, New York
*Melrose, New York
*Valley Falls, New York
*Johnsonville, New York
*Buskirk, New York
*Eagle Bridge, New York A picture of it can be found here
*Hoosick Junction, New York
*Hoosick Falls, New York
*Hoosick, New York
*Petersburg Junction, New York
*Pownal, Vermont
*Williamstwon, Massachusetts
*North Adams, Massachusetts
*Hoosac Tunnel
*Hoosac Tunnel Station
*Charlemont, Massachusetts
*Buckland, Massachusetts
*Shelburne Falls, Massachusetts
*Greenfield, Massachusetts
Anybody have a clue of what I did right or wrong? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Station list
Talk:Ula

message: I believe the tribe should be moved back to this name as there is no real need for disambig page. Renata 17:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure, some people may be unaware of diacritics and would have problem finding the river. --Lysytalk 18:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a bunch of  exactly for that reason. I strongly prefer having articles at their most natural name. Renata 18:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there wasn't the the article on the tribe, we'd have a redirect from Ula to Ūla. I think whether we use disamb or otheruses is probably a matter of personal preferences. Feel free to use  if you consider it to be better. --Lysytalk 20:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. I just did a google search of wiki and found a load more of different ulas... So disambg is really needed. Renata 20:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hesperidium

message: Okay, I just expanded this article a little, and managed to cite a source to verify some of the information. In terms of expanding it further, it would be interesting to see some information about the evolution of this form of berry, as well as the particular anatomy. I have been told that the soft white stringy part down the core of an orane is known as the placenta.         ...of course most of this is of no interest to most people, I'm just a plant nerd... Parables 01:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am interested:-)--Juan de Vojníkov 18:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Harry Del Rios

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust The Homunculus 13:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Harry Del Rios →  – His most notable stint came under that name. It's hands down the name he is best known by. GeicoHen (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
is this guy related to alberto del rio or something.if not fix and help this article thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.62.75.104 (talk) 03:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:St. John's Episcopal Church (Richmond, Virginia)

message: I don't think the current photo depicts the church in which Patrick Henry delivered his famous speech -- the one accross from Virginia's capitol. It must be the other Saint John's Church mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.115.38.97 (talk • contribs) 
: Actually, it is, it's just a wierd angle. see reference MPS 18:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article includes a good deal of historical matter not directly relevant to St. John's Episcopal Church.  Even though much of it is unsourced, I have resisted the temptation to delete it wholesale, as parts of it are pretty interesting, even if not appropriate for this article.  I'm hoping that somebody knowledgeable about the church will pare down the article, or, where possible, strengthen the connections between the church and the historical anecdotes.  If nobody does that within a reasonable time I may come back and start cutting.
A note about my recent copy-editing:  in most English-speaking Christian traditions, "Reverend" is an adjective applied to members of the clergy, not their title.  (Cf. Honorable for judges and mayors.)  So one shouldn't refer to "Reverend Sarah Johnson" or "Rev. Johnson", any more than one would call a judge, "Honorable Smith".  Rather, one should call her "the Reverend Sarah Johnson"; and, once she's been identified, "the Rev. Ms. Johnson", or simply, "Ms. Johnson", or, in an encyclopedia article, plain "Johnson".  J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 20:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant History; "Reverend"
Talk:Classified magazine

message: I'm sure some classified magazines are using SMS as a revenue stream (e.g. text this number for more info on an ad), but I can't think of an actual example offhand. Can anyone confirm I'm not imagining this? Barnabypage 18:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMS as a revenue stream? 

message: Contact magazine has been around for almost a decade, and doesn't appear to have expanded very much.  I dream of horses    @  05:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Contact magazine]] 
Talk:Hot desking

message: I am planning to use this page as a disambiguation. It would point to both Hot desking and Harold Hotelling. User:Bruguiea 18:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotelling 

message: While it's obvious hot desking saves floorspace, there's no mention on the productivity impact of acquiring a workspace every day.  Has any research or writing been done on the subject; does it counter-intuitively raise productivity? Josh Parris 00:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficiency vs productivity 

message: This article looks like it is written by a company that sells hot desking systems/services.
Nowhere does it mention that it is a common subject of ridicule.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.220.214.6 (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article bias 

message: I have been working on this article to address a flag for citations that was placed back in 2013, and generally to improve the article's coverage of the topic. I work in the industry (for AgilQuest). My intent is to improve the article according to Wikipedia's neutrality standards, not to advance my company's interests in particular. -Dlucy67 (talk) 17:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing long-standing issues 

message: From the lede:
:Research has demonstrated that while there may be cost savings in office space hot desking has significant negative impacts on both productivity and staff morale.https://www.victoria.ac.nz/som/clew/publications/modern_office_design.pdf
From the "Usage" section:
:However, it is seen that hot desking can increase productivity and communication in a business. 
So, which is it? 198.176.82.33 (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article contradicts itself 

message: The article uses three different forms of the word: hot-desking, hot desking and hotdesking. It should be standardised in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.14.187.10 (talk) 13:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:Yadis

message: What is this, "Yet Another Dynamic ID System" or some such? is there a source for the acronym? -- Metahacker 17:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym? 

message: It seems that no update has been made to Yadis since the first specs in 2006. Should this article be turned to the past tense?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabienpe (talk • contribs) 09:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct technology?
Talk:Wrestling singlet

message: Is it allowed to use images from (sports)clothes to illustrate an article? I've found some images from wrestling singlets in an online store, but i'm not sure if I can use them for this article, looking at copyright issues. Can anyone clarify that for me? And if I can use them, what license do these images have? --Jort227 18:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the benefit of anyone reading, no. It would be very easy to take a picture of someone in a wrestling singlet and release it under GFDL or something like that, meaning what you propose is replaceable fair use. Daniel Case 14:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

text: And indeed, someone did exactly that. Daniel Case 14:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of images
Talk:Namokar Mantra

message: ::Digamber use only first five line of Namokar Mantra where as swetamber use in full.  There is also difference in order from Hathi Guffa caves of Orissa and present order of lines.
:::vkvora 18:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that it is really confusing that the title of the article is "Namokar Mantra" but the first sentence begins with "Navakar Mantra" in bold. Either the title or the first sentence should be changed to match each other. I am no expert on this, so I don't know which is better, but I am changing the article temporarily to begin with "Namokar Mantra."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.185.141 (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title and the first sentence 

message: मंगलाणं च सव्वेसिं, पडमम हवई मंगलं
There is an error in the word padamama.
It should be paDHAmama. correctly shown in the transliteration.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.31.216 (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from the article 
Talk:Faith-sufferer

message: The neutrality of this entry is suspect.  The tone within the entire piece is antagonistic towards religion in general.
I agree. Worse still, this article, as it stands, claims that many people who are psychotic suffer from a psychosis yet that few people who suffer from a psychosis are psychotic. Psychotic is merely the adjectival form of the noun psychosis. I suspect the word the editor was searching for representing the popular use of the word psychotic as "meaning violent and out of control" is psychopathic although being "out of control" is not a sign of psychopathic personality.--24.217.183.224 10:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not follow from Dawkins' notability, or that of his essay, that every "nonce word" or extraordianry coinage that he makes is also notable.  In fact, wikipedia policy specifically denounces wikipedia's use as a dictionary of neologisms.209.30.90.117 05:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I assume this is proper protocol.  The guide to deletion page states "Anyone can make a nomination, including anonymous users .... Anonymous users cannot complete the process, as they are technically prohibited from creating new pages." 209.30.90.117 01:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the Articles for deletion page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Faith-sufferer Jbhood 07:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I see no relationship between the concept of Faith-sufferer as explained in the article and the text bellow, so I’m moving it here for discussion. Is there a reason to mention physiology of religious experience in the article? How is it related with the concept of Faith-sufferer, since the section mentions neither mental health nor mental illness? --Leinad ¬  »saudações! 13:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text moved from the article
Talk:Pewamo, Michigan

message: The external link at the bottom of the page prompts you to put in a username and password.  It needs to be fixed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.62.73.67 (talk) 20:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's gone.  I removed it (and the external links section). --Elliskev 21:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a problem with the external link
Talk:7 World Trade Center/Archive 4

message: Since it is going to have to happen eventually:--DCAnderson 23:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I know for a fact that Guinnog is capable of excellent work in Wikipedia, so I will tone this down, especially for him. The poll was solicited by a conspiracy theory group that specified the wording of questions to be asked. The answers to those questions indicate that a large number of respondants feel the government needed to do a better job investigating what happened...from what I gathered, that is all and I don't think this is noteworthy, especially for this article..maybe elsewhere, but not here.--MONGO 07:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: In reading over the link Guinnog provided above, Zogby claims they wrote the questions and they were approved...but the results only indicate that 48% of respondants feel the government isn't covering anything up, while 42% feel the opposite, 47% feel the WTC disaster was investigated well enough and 45% would like to see a reinvestigation, 43% know nothing about the WTC7 collapse and 38% know about it and think the 9/11 commission should have investigated it....14% said the feds were fine in just investigating the main towers. I simply don't understand why the poll is interesting to anyone...they don't indicate much of anything to me.--MONGO 08:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Lastly, why doesn't Zogby show us the results of the entire poll? I see only the questions and their reports of what the respondants stated for questions 23-27. Where is the rest of the poll?--MONGO 08:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Personally, I don't care about the poll. The numbers are completely meaningless becuase of the intentionally misleading nature of the questions. It's like reading one of the dihydrogen monoxide scams. Image the question, "Dihydrogen monoxide is one of the leading causes of death in children under the age of 10, yet the federal government refuses to investigate the usage of this chemical. Do you think the FDA should be required to investigate the use of this chemical?". The Zogby poll isn't any different. It's worthless, except maybe for its humor value. But, that doesn't matter. Reality; we'll keep spinning this over and over and over again, restating the same arguments a zillion times and we're still going to disagree. --Durin 12:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC