lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:University of Oxford

message: The template currently lists Archaeology and Archaeology of the History of Art as separate departments, but they were both merged into the School of Archaeology in 2000. The university's web page only recognises the School of Archaeology as a department,http://www.ox.ac.uk/about/divisions-and-departments and the other two institutes are now referred to as sub-departmental sites.https://www.arch.ox.ac.uk/rlaha.html I propose that these two links are replaced with one to the School of Archaeology page. Both institutes still have their own pages that can be accessed via the School of Archaeology one, and replacing these two links with one will also make the template smaller. Amys eye (talk) 09:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change 

message: Shoud we add a section for GLAM ? And should we treat GLAM as a pseudo-division (which in many ways it is) or give it an entirely separate section? Jonathan A Jones (talk) 11:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardens, Libraries and Museums 

message: The MPLS division of the University is merging its Department of Zoology and Department of Plant Sciences on Monday 1 August 2022. They should be removed and replaced with Department of Biology (aka just Biology in the template) which should link to this Wikipage:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Department_of_Biology,_University_of_Oxford BiologyCommsOxford1 (talk) 20:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As the draft was declined for being improperly sourced. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: These corrections now made. 48jkb35m (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 48jkb35m, I have updated the template. TSventon (talk) 15:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2022
Talk:Gothic aesthetics

message: Doesn't really seems to merit it's own article, but infromation would be useful in the main article Zazaban 18:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Goth Subculture. 

message: "gothic aesthetics involve the conjunction of several factors which function concurrently."
WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK?
67.176.25.230 (talk) 04:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would someone please delete this page. It is utterly pointless and very poorly written. Very Old School Goth (talk) 12:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't delete pages just because they're badly written. If there are improvements to be made, you can tag it with  or one of its specific versions, or you can be bold and fix it.  ... discospinster talk 15:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about how the page is completely pointless and unnoteworthy. "Aesthetics"? How do "Camp", "Sublime" or "Despair" have anything at all to do with Gothic aesthetics? Sublime? Sublime what? This looks like it was written by a ten year old who was trying to string together a bunch of five dollar words to sound intelligent and failed miserably. There is no point in merging this with any other article. It just needs to be deleted.Very Old School Goth (talk) 20:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  absolutely TERRIBLE writing 

message: This article is completely redundant on explainig the gothic aesthetics (using the word gothic to name the subculture that emerged on the 80's of course); The first two sections rather explain the aesthetics of the gothic arquitecture, when the point of the article should be to explain the aesthetics of the goth subculture and as a result describing to which point goth aesthetics are influenced with gothic aesthetics and other aesthetics. As for the futher three sections, their content doesn't explains anything at all. Nancy Kilpatrick's book "The Goth Bible" states that "Romance is at the heart of what it means to be goth". What sort of explanation it gives about how goth is related with romantisism? It's certainly valid to say that the elements gothic aesthetics are camp style, a sublime perspective, romanticism, dispair, and nostalgia, but the article doesn't explains how neither why. Fae-Baudelaire (talk) 01:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to be killed. Not rewritten. IMO. This page is pointless. Very Old School Goth (talk) 12:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  REWRITE please
Talk:Lord Derby's parakeet

message: The taxobox says this species is LC, yet the article says it's the rarest of mainland Asian Psittacidae.  Am I the only one who thinks this sounds inconsistent?  Tomertalk 14:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal inconsistency? 
Talk:Chiller Cabinet

message: This is the first wiki I've created, so it is very basic and could do with improvements.
Samuelih 00:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In order for this article to remain, the info in it must be sourced from an independent and reliable source please add them if they are available. --Daniel J. Leivick 17:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gerd-Liv Valla

message: In this edit the following unreferenced text was added:
:During the 70ties Valla was also active in the communist union of the university (Kommunistisk Universitetslag) which worked together with the Stalin-communistic organization Kommunstisk Arbeiderforbund. Valla was active in the organization until the 1980ties. At that point the organization debated whether to reject or keep Stalin as a hero. Valla voted on the side that was for Stalin.
I move this text here since it appears to infringe on WP:BLP. If this can be referenced properly I see no reason why it shouldn't be included in the article though. __meco (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalin-support edit moved here 
Talk:Gerd Honsik

message: I have removed all unsourced allegations of "terrorist" activities by Honsik - he is a living person so this sort of thing is very sensitive indeed. Lfh (talk) 12:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorism 
Talk:Gerda Hnatyshyn

message: According to an e-mail I received from Gerda Hnatyshyn's secretary (at The Hnatyshyn Foundation) on 7 May 2015, "both her parents and grandparents were Danish", which I read to say that she had no Norwegian ancestry. I contacted her in connection with my work as administrator of Slektshistoriewiki, the Norwegian Genealogy Wiki (as I originally thought she was of Norwegian descent). So the category "Canadian people of Norwegian descent" should perhaps be deleted from the article? Dag T. Hoelseth (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestry
Talk:Gerda Lerner

message: This page is somewhat inaccurate. I don't believe Gerda Lerner was a founder of the National Organization for Women. In fact, I don't think she was ever active in that organization. As far as I can tell she's not mentioned anywhere on the NOW website, and she's not listed as one of their founders.  In 1946 she was active in the Congress of American Women (CAW), helping to found the Los Angeles chapter. She was a local and national leader in the organization for a short period. See page 256 of her autobiography, Fireweed. 
I would ask that this information be taken down until it is corrected or someone can produce a reputable citation. 
Lknelson3 (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOW

message: She wasn't earlier than Mary Beard... -- AnonMoos (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Lerner was among the first to bring a consciously feminist lens to the study of history"
Talk:GMC Syclone

message: -No don't merge them, they're two completely different vehicles.  That would be like combining the F-150 and Ford Expedition page just because they use the same platform. --70.121.147.250 01:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

message: It says on the article that the Syclone does 0-60 in 4.3 seconds and 0-quarter mile in 13.6 at 93 mph. I need to see a link that refers to those times. Also, Car and Driver says 5.3 and 14.1 at 93. 76.254.19.111 (talk) 04:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly an original research? 

message: Hi to my fellow SyTySoGT enthusiasts -
The Syclone wiki page has for years been dormant with incomplete and somewhat inaccurate information regarding the GMC Syclone. Im working on doing a lot of editing to help make the page better by using both GM and PAS official documentation. I have been documenting these trucks for over 20 years and have a vast resource of information collected to be able to share. There is a bunch of misleading and inaccurate information on the trucks (production numbers, dates, colors, etc) that have been verified over the years and need to be corrected.
As these trucks gain more publicity and have reached "classic" status, id like to make sure that info posted is both accurate and historically correct. 
I appreciate everyone's help and contributions to the page!  Thanks!
SyTySoGT (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating page with historical information and tech data
Talk:Tashi Tsering (Australian Geshe)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
"Geshe" is a title. "Tashi" seems to be a personal name.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Tashi Tsering (Jamyang Buddhist Centre)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
"Geshe" is a title. "Tashi" seems to be a personal name.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Thupten Jinpa

message: The links to the Institute of Tibetan Classics in this post are incorrect but I don't know how to fix them - so I thought I'd mention it here in case someone can do it.   The correct link is http://www.tibetanclassics.org/ Ethicsandkids (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 

message: References 
[3] Thupten Jinpa 
This is linked to  Snowlionbookreviw, where the linked Page can't be found.
The search for Thupten, Jinpa and for Thupten Jinpa gives no result.
This reference shoul be deleted. Jothecat21 (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Ming dynasty painting

message: Corrected some minor grammatical mistakes and revised sentence structure in "Influences."
--Akiora (talk) 17:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Error / Readibility 
Talk:What About Bob? (Home Improvement)

message: This has been CSD'd - as the same user's created pages for every other episode, none of which have any more content than this, which have not been CSD'd, I think it's unfair to single this particular episode out.
If the intention is to delete all the episodes, I withdraw this , which is based purely on deleting one episode whilst keeping the others. -  Iridescent (talk to me!) 01:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right - although I have them as copyvios from www.tbs.com - I hadn't realised they were copyvios, I'll start the tagging run now. -  Iridescent (talk to me!) 01:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:David W. Allen

message: The statement "Allen animated the impressive creature that highlights the best sequences of the 1985 thriller, The Gate" is incorrect. David had nothing to do with that production. That "impressive creature" was designed, sculpted and animated by Randall William Cook, the Visual Effects Designer and Supervisor of "The Gate", who later went on to design and supervise the animation sequences for "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:RWC51 (talk • contribs).
Above statement is accurate. I visited with Randall Cook when he was working on "The Gate". David Allen was not involved. ````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daswotan (talk • contribs) 22:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Gate
Talk:Gheorghe Catrina

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Gia Farrell

message: My girlfriend was her understudy in this middle school production of Guys and Dolls where every student who auditioned was cast.
How do you define local production? This sounds like community theater to me.
--2604:2000:8087:DF00:39:5A62:C4D4:2D2B (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of local production
Talk:Giampiero Pinzi

message: This article about Giampiero Pinzi is grammatically rather poor. 94.142.239.2 (talk) 11:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen worse. :-) Could you either a) be bold and fix the issues yourself or b) point out specific issues? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor grammar
Talk:Gian Magdangal

message: I added these twin notable events in his life boy and award. Gian was chosen Most Promising Male Singer by the Guillermo Mendoza Memorial Scholarship Foundation at the 38th Box-Office Entertainment Awards held on May 13, 2008. Their child, Gian Hailey was born on May 7, 2008.  GMA NEWS.TV, Gian Magdangal talks about one-week-old son with Sheree --Florentino floro (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Boy
Talk:Gian Piero Reverberi

message: Admin user:Awiseman contends that writing "gifted" and "astonishing" are opinions. Probably they are. But look what the Italian Wikipedia has to say of this notable musician: 
:"Gian Piero Reverberi ...è uno dei personaggi più noti e qualificati del panorama musicale italiano. Fratello di Gian Franco Reverberi, anche lui famoso musicista e compositore."
:Translation: "Gian Piero Reverberi ..is one of the most remarkable and qualified characters of the Italian musical panorama. Brother of Gian Franco Reverberi, also a famous musician and composer." 
An Italian Admin could also consider such remarks as being biased, but that has not happened. I'll obligue and just say that he is prolific, which is not just my opinion, it's an undeniable fact. Regards, --AVM (talk) 23:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't use other wikipedias as sources for stuff like that. "Gifted" and "astonishing" can't be used without a reliable source using them. --AW (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV vs. NPOV contrasts, English vs. Italian Wikipedias 

message: How is it possible that there is an entry, '1997 – The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe (with Robert Mellin)', when Mr Mellin died some years earlier? Was it a re-release? The theme and incidental music referred to, a collaboration by Robert Mellin and Gian-Piero Reverberi, came out in the 1960s to accompany a Franco-London Films TV series, the programmes being released in the USA with quite different music. None of the entries in the list has a citation, I notice. Humboles (talk) 01:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography Query
Talk:Gianmarco Pozzecco

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Qaasim Middleton

message: Actually it seems to refer to a character in a television series The Naked Brothers Band (TV series), so technically a db-bio isn't appropriate. (Yes, I made that mistake already) Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 01:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because comments on YouTube are far from reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 01:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should not be given a db-bio 

message: We had relied on the date of birth from Middleton's IMDB profile. However, that's been challenged by a user, and IMDB is problematic as a source and typically only used in limited cases.
As a result, under a strict read of WP:BLP, I have removed the date of birth. If somebody can provide a source that is published in an independent reliable source, then we can add that date of birth to the article. Normally, I would say that if the subject's official website provided the info, we could use that also. Middleton has no official website listed, though, and any website that would be added now would need to be verified to make sure it is official and not a fan site. —C.Fred (talk) 14:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Gianni Paladini

message: A promising teenage footballer, he was forced to give up the game at the age of 18, before playing a single game for his home town club Napoli - although, between 1958 and 1967, Paladini claims he was on Napoli’s books wearing the No 10 shirt, and later played for Juventus and the Italian national team.
:How can he have been forced to give up the game at 18 and played for juventus and italy??
::that would make him a liar. Heaven forfend.86.134.33.161 17:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh??

message: What was his role in the recent investments in QPR, and what is his position now? Choalbaton (talk) 19:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update tag
Talk:Mascarene parrot

message: Hi, , in regard to the double image under description where you left a note, I considered the various options when I did it, and here are my thoughts. 1: the adjacent text talks specifically about Martinet's plate currently placed on the left (this was originally the only image there), so I thought it should be "first", and therefore left where it is now, facing towards the text. 2: The second image is also by Martinet, but isn't actually discussed in the source, but I put it there because it is still relevant to the point about different Martinet plates using different colours, but if I find a different version of the first plate with different colours (which would therefore also face left), I would use that instead. 3: I think it isn't so straightforward which is the "correct" way to make the subjects of the images face in a case like this where they face different ways. I'd argue that the current configuration, where the gallery is right aligned, and the left bird faces the text, but the other one away, is just as valid as one where the left bird faces away, but the right bird faces the text. In either case, one bird faces the text, but in the current version, at least the one closest to the text is the one facing it, (which I think would be closer to "correct"). But in the end, I think it is very subjective in cases like this, and I doubt those who wrote the MOS ever had it in mind. FunkMonk (talk) 21:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, not a concern ... I could see it was complicated ... thanks for the response anyway.  Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  21:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double image issue
Talk:Lesser vasa parrot

message: The image currently on the page does not appear to be of a parrot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jss367 (talk • contribs) 08:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: * looks like some old vandalism that was missed, have restored proper images. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 08:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image not of parrot
Talk:Gifford Nielsen

message: :The following was incorrectly placed at Talk:Gifford Nielsen/Comments, when i should have gone here, so moving here. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats

message: I had a problem with a category that was recently added to this article. The category that was added attempted to classify Nielsen as being among Latter Day Saint leaders born in the United States. This category, in my mind, is not relevant. Here's my reasoning, which I share for those who may not be familiar with the history. Latter Day Saints are classified as those who adhered to the religious movement founded by Joseph Smith. When Smith was killed in 1844, a succession crisis resulted, with several groups who traced their origins back to the religion started by Smith claiming that they are the rightful successors to that movement. The largest of these so-called splinter groups is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Many leaders in the LDS Church have been categorized as being part of the Latter Day Saint movement, but that particular categorization does not, in my mind, apply to any who were never involved in the original movement started by Smith. And since it has not been reliably proven which of all the splinter groups is rightfully the true successor to the movement started by Smith, those who belong to the LDS Church and never personally had any part in the original movement should be categorized as such. With that in mind, I wanted to get this verified by consensus and to see if we could, in any way, find a category that is more relevant to Nielsen. He does not belong in the general Latter Day Saint category because he was born well after the splinter group in which he is now a leader was separated from the others. At least, that's my opinion. Thoughts? --Jgstokes (talk) 03:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed a category that I felt didn't apply 

message: Hello again, everyone! As outlined here, there is a big difference between the updated MOS from the Church and Wikipedia's manual of style relating to articles about the Church. That said, both of those manuals of style are in agreement on one point: The full name of the Church should be used in the first reference thereunton in each article about Church-related topics. After that, abbreviations remain acceptable. Therefore, it is inappropriate for any Wikipedia user to try and incorporate the full name of the Church on every mention thereunto in every article about Church-related subjects. Post any questions on this on the talk page to which I linked above. Thank you. --Jgstokes (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Church MOS vs. Wikipedia LDS MOS
Talk:Once Upon a Forest/to do

message: Before the page sees featured candidacy, Wikipedia needs your help in these tasks:
*Red links: As of typing, many of them are clogging the article's readability. Create stubs or remove such links, especially those concerning the cast members.
*Copyediting is a possibililty, especially in the Production section.
*Screenshots of the characters—if you have the DVD and VLC media player, please get them and upload them to the site.
* More reliable sources might come in handy as the page gets longer, and could benefit the Reception details.
All of these have to be accomplished by Easter, when the article is ready for FAC. --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 01:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Norfolk kākā

message: Breath taking to see the images of existing specimens of this extinct parrot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.17.161 (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved   -- Calidum 20:13, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Norfolk kaka →  – Not an expert here, so thought I'd seek community input on this. Move to macron version as per move discussion at kākā (6 October) and Wikipedia's naming conventions for New Zealand. AFreshStart (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 October 2021