lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Donald Trefusis

message: I know this is only a stub, but can someone please reference the "gay" bit.  I do not recall this charecter ever discussing his sexuality one way or the other (though it has been a while since I have seen the stuff).  82.19.66.37 19:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I was surprised to see it, and then saw your comment here. I've removed the 'gay' ref. --DudeGalea 17:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I seem to recall that the Trefusis character is based on a real person. Does anyone know who it was ? Far Canal (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Person ?
Talk:QTFairUse

message: Does anyone know if the process QTFairUse uses is lossless?
If you were to compare the bit for bit output between an encrypted file, and one after being stripped of DRM, is there any difference?
:The process is lossless, yes. The application works by grabbing the decrypted AAC-audio bytes from memory after/as iTunes decrypts the tracks. If you were to compare the files bit-by-bit they would be different as you're going from encrypted data to decrypted data and we've got to put that decrypted data into a new AAC container. --68.58.16.36 21:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was asking if the output (raw PCM sound) would be bit-by-bit identical. 201.212.44.26 (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lossless?

message: Just to let you know. The purpose of selecting an article is both to point readers to the article and to highlight it to potential contributors. It will remain on the portal for a week or so. The previous selected article was Open Source Tripwire, an intrusion detection system.
For other interesting free software articles, you can take a look at the archive of PFs selectees. --Gronky 19:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Time goes by and the new selectee is Cygnus Solutions.  Later bought by Red Hat, Cygnus was probably the first big free software development company. --Gronky 21:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Free software]]: QTFairUse now the selected article 

message: "intercepts the unencrypted AAC data stream as it is sent to the sound card"? So the sound card is decompressing the stream? I would have expected iTunes to send already decompressed audio to the card... 201.212.44.26 (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "So the sound card is decompressing the stream? I would have expected iTunes to send already decompressed audio to the card..."  Of course the sound card is the one decompressing it, otherwise there would be no point in having a sound card as the cpu would be doing all the transitioning. 204.185.81.1 (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Last time I checked, PC sound cards (or onboard audio) were just DACs, with some MIDI stuff thrown in. QTFairUse works by grabbing the AAC frames out of memory, after they've been decrypted but before being decoded to PCM data and sent to the sound card. See this comment -- Steved424 (talk) 22:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound card?
Talk:Puffadder shyshark

message: This article contradicts the article on the natal shyshark.  The article on the natal shyshark makes it clear that the natal shyshark is a distinct species.  The natal shyshark article is (as of now) more recently updated, so I think it's probably more accurate. This article leaves the issue undetermined.  If anyone knows for sure, can you please update this article accordingly?--Beezer137 19:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, Beezer137.  Now fixed. GrahamBould 19:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare with natal shyshark article 

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Metalaxyl

message: Can't find a reference for when Irish potato farmers sued the company. Learnt about it in class...didn't even write down name of company!(a Mentally Efficient Loonies And Nice Insane Elephants creation 19:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Dear Author(s),
I am interested in adding an External Link for this product that directs users to its product information page on the Crop Protection Database (CPD). The CPD is a fact-based, neutral listing of technical information for crop protection products. The CPD listing for this product expands upon the information listed on Wikipedia and would be a valuable addition to the page. This includes experimental code numbers, mode of action, outside U.S. registration information, environmental guidelines, handling/storage information, and a comprehensive list of suppliers, brand names, premix partners, and discontinued products. 
Please strongly consider approving my request. For more information, visit: http://www.farmchemicalsinternational.com/cropprotection/cpd/
Regards,
Judygt (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding New External Link 
Talk:Wildlife tourism

message: .... and kindly contribute to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.
See Wildlife of India for reference.
Thanks
Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Please create more "[[Wildlife of .....]]" articles for all countries.'''

message: If you are interested in Environment, Wildlife, Conservation and Nature etc. please join in to contribute, even starting off with making new stub class articles will be a great contribution.
Sincerely
Atulsnischal 16:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We need senior administrators or people who are long in Wikipedia to help us with the templates and for other further helps. Details can be seen in its talk page. IT's urgent. We want this wkiproject to be added to the exsisting WP:IND banner. Amartyabag  TALK2ME 05:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Invitation for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas of India]] & Conservation'''

message: The page currently defines wildlife tourism very narrowly, and ignores the presence of tourism geared towards direct interaction with animals including (but not limited to) hunting/cull participation. It is my understanding that tourists participating in culls/hunts are still wildlife tourists, even though their actions are not always to the benefit of the wildlife.
I'm proposing that we include in the definition of "wildlife tourism" not just "watching wild animals in their natural habitat" but "interacting with..." including both invasive and noninvasive interaction. I don't have a set phrasing for use down yet, but I believe we would be remiss if we exclude these other contexts.
If this edit is appropriate, there are further edits to the page I would like to offer, including a discussion of the benefits and detriments of wildlife tourism in the specific context of culls (both their impact on local life and impact on perception of tourism practices).
Some sources for consideration include
Reynolds, Paul C., and Dick Braithwaite. "Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism." Tourism management 22.1 (2001): 31-42.
Côté, Isabelle M., Stephanie J. Green, and Mark A. Hixon. "Predatory fish invaders: insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean." Biological Conservation 164 (2013): 50-61.
Johnston, Matthew W., and Sam J. Purkis. "A coordinated and sustained international strategy is required to turn the tide on the Atlantic lionfish invasion." Marine Ecology Progress Series 533 (2015): 219-235.
Infield, Mark. "Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa." Biological Conservation 45.1 (1988): 21-46.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JM LaV (talk • contribs) 16:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed addition of less savory context 

message: @payal thakur 2409:4056:E4C:1F53:0:0:E708:A008 (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism
Talk:1999 Jiji earthquake

message: Hello!  I have a photograph that might be appropriate to post on this wikipedia page.  I took the photo inside the Taroko Gorge a few days after the quake.  It shows a massive bridge tumbled in ruins, with heavy construction equipment clearing away the wreckage.  I'm totally wikipedia-ignorant, so I don't know how to post this photo myself, nor do I want to take the time to learn how to do it!  But if you'd be interested in looking at the photo, and using it on this wiki page or anywhere else (I have no copyright interests), please let me know and I'd be happy to email it to you.  My email:  china.teacher@yahoo.com      Regards,  Dan Kuehner  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.7.168.207 (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think that "921 earthquake" is a more common name. Although most earthquake articles are named in the "YEAR PLACE earthquake" format, I don't think there is a naming policy on that.--Jerrch 20:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't there a Wiki policy that says we use the common English name for things, presumably including earthquakes? Readin (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, WP:UCN.--Jerrch 21:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know how to rename stuff?  I don't.Readin (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the move, FOARP. Readin (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: The first picture, :File:Earthquake- road crack.jpg, looks like just some road maintenance. Jidanni (talk) 04:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The image of road repair in Taichung just looks like road repair. Seems like a tighter-cropped image of the Wuchang Temple would be both a better illustration of the damage, and a more iconic image from the disaster. (Many people in Taiwan think of the temple when they think of the 9/21 earthquake; almost no one thinks of this particular stretch of road.) 2401:E180:8820:12AD:6B32:C4D8:890C:94A (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It does look like road maintenance, doesn't it? I've removed it. Dawnseeker2000 15:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first picture looks like the quake was no big deal
Talk:Castlecomer

message: Article reads that it is a coal-mining town, but coal-mining is not mentioned in employment details. 76.102.1.193 (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coal mining town? 

message: The current entry could probably do with a slight tweak as the railway was initially set up by the British around 1919-1921 owned by it's own Company until absorbed by the GSR in 1925 though the GSWR.  I currently don't want to make significant changes as I am focused elsewhere. I have just noticed this article does not link to the Deerpark Mines article and will do minimal linking/improvement in this respect.  I may also create a redirect article for the Castecombe Railway/Castlecombe Colliery Railway.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castlecomer Railway 

message: I've visited this article with a focus on the railway, but believe the dealings of the Wandesford/Wandesforde family and Brennan clan have not been developed as much as might be possible.  I've tweaked the history section slightly, but there is likely more that can be done, though exactly what can be done without undue article disruption is beyond me.Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wandesforde Family
Talk:Bolesław V the Chaste

message: I hope nobody objects; I've changed the default sort order in the categories.  It had been set to sort as Chaste, Bolesław the.  At least in :Category:House of Piast it makes more sense--and is more consistent with the bulk of the other entries--to have it sort as Bolesław.  If anybody feels that it should be the other way in some other category, perhaps they could change it for that particular category, rather than across the board.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 16:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed categories sort orders 

message: It's said in the article about Casimir that Casimir followed Boleslaw's lead when Boleslaw in 1264 granted privelages to Jews in Poland. Casimir granted protection to Jews to encourage them to settle in Poland. But this article does not say what Boleslaw's relation to the Jewish community was or what he did for them, or what Casimir would necessarily follow. Does anyone know?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.105.146 (talk) 07:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Jews 
Talk:Mieszko IV Tanglefoot

message: I hope nobody objects; I've changed the default sort order in the categories. It had been set to sort as Tanglefoot, Mieszko I. At least in Category:House of Piast it makes more sense--and is more consistent with the bulk of the other entries--to have it sort as Mieszko. If anybody feels that it should be the other way in some other category, perhaps they could change it for that particular category, rather than across the board.  71.126.140.136 (talk) 19:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change categories' sort orders
Talk:Bengoetxea

message: It is a variation of Ongaitz, Dongaitz, Engaitz, (gamonal or cacique). As no one knows of its origin and because there are so many different houses. 
I took that part out of the "Meaning" section because I don't know what it means, and I'm not sure how to reformulate it into standard English... Dreamyshade 05:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Bolesław IV the Curly

message: I hope nobody objects; I've changed the default sort order in the categories.  It had been set to sort as Curly, Bolesław the.  At least in :Category:House of Piast it makes more sense--and is more consistent with the bulk of the other entries--to have it sort as Bolesław.  If anybody feels that it should be the other way in some other category, perhaps they could change it for that particular category, rather than across the board.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed categories sort orders 

message: Basic information to add to this article, in order to make it properly encyclopedic: what "the Curly" refers to. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Zbigniew of Poland

message: It needs to be clarified what was the period of his reign: 1102–1106 or –1107. The article says that his reign ended in 1106, although Piast dynasty and List of Polish monarchs says it was in 1107. Visor (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reign period

message: During B-class review for WP:POLAND I determined that the article fails in criterion b1 (Referencing & citations). Once the requested citations are added, please reclassify this to B-class. Any GA review before that is, sadly, a waste of time (as obviously the citation requests will need to be addressed for GA, too). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  21:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was interested in reviewing this for GA today but saw the many referencing issues and decided to leave it alone. Since this issue was already identified by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus almost three weeks ago without action being taken, I am removing this article from the GA nomination list since it would have failed. Once the citations have been added, the article can be renominated. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class failed, GA thoughts
Talk:Wokingham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/10/00/546F3565-4A72-4D80-B2D1-3F986CEAF3A6/Get%20Help.webarchive 2402:7500:4E4:D356:6D25:47A1:6F05:B29A (talk) 14:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team
Talk:Bezprym

message: --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

message: Failed for WPPOLAND due to insufficient inline cites. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class

message: First Due to tradition and the impossibility of determining the correct version of the name, Bezprym remains the form used, although, according to K. Jasiński, it probably requires modifications., then The name meant "stubborn", "self-confident, not willing to retreat". How on earth can we know the latter if we cannot establish the former? It's not an Etruscan or Pelasgian name, where any educated guess might perhaps be included in the article in order to avoid stopping at "no one knows". Slavic languages are, overall, decently attested. If there's no sensible etymology in spite of it, there's no reason to include potentially spurious fillers. 89.64.27.1 (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Prime Minister of Poland

message: To be quick: total lack of inline citations = fail. Also, poor section structure (overview+lists). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  22:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review: failed

message: You must add PM of Second Republic, Government on exile and all not some from the ending of communist period Boniek1988 (talk) 02:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all prime ministers... 

message: President of Poland Andrzej Duda not designated her to Prime minister. She is PiS candidate already.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.120.127.252 (talk) 17:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Beata Szydło

message: Prime minoster of poland can pay a visit to someone's country as seen in parliamentary republics.2404:8000:1027:85F6:98F2:6219:643F:DEC2 (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: 204.116.208.187 (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 December 2023
Talk:National Assembly (Poland)

message: According to Polish Constitution, the National Assembly is the name of both houses of Polish parliament - the Sejm and the Senate - ONLY when they are in joint session. It should not be used as a synonym to the term "Polish parliament". Unfortunately, many Wikipedia articles mentioning the Polish parliament link to this page. Also, the redirection from the term "Polish parliament" to this page should be deleted. Maybe it would be a good idea to create the page "Parliament of the Republic of Poland" with explanation of term "the National Assembly" only as part of it? 
89.231.199.203 (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm. The article does make it clear that NA refers to the sitting of both chambers. Polish Wikipedia does not have a page on "parlament polski" or such. I don't think we need an article on the subject, but perhaps a disambig would be more appropriate? PS. Please consider creating an account. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 00:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that separate articles about the parliament, the National Assembly and each of the two houses would be an overkill. But how about creating a new article, Parliament of Poland, with "National Assembly" as one of its sections? National Assembly could then redirect to that section. This would be in line with articles about other countries' parliaments (one article each for a bicameral parliament and both houses) and at the same time reduce the confusion whether "National Assembly" is the correct name for the Polish parliament. — Kpalion(talk) 20:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I do think that NA is notable enough to remain as it is. No objection to attempting to write a PoP article, of course. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Well, is it? It only gathers for about an hour once in five years. Looking at the article as it is now, it seems there's not much to say about the Assembly (only the prose is actually about the Assembly; everything else, like the infobox, doesn't really belong here, but would belong in an article about the parliament). I'm not saying we should never have a separate article about the Assembly. But how about making it a section of Parliament of Poland for a start and splitting it out once it grows big enough for a standalone article? — Kpalion(talk) 22:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish Parliament and The National Assembly ARE NOT synonyms!
Talk:Senate of Poland

message: If the senate is elected by plurality block vote, I would expect every major party to nominate as many candidates as there are seats in that constituency, as many as the voters in that constituency have votes. (Assuming that a voter has as many votes as there are seats in his constituency - is this correct?)
But this is not the case: http://wybory2007.pkw.gov.pl/SNT/EN/KOMITETY/dsk.htm 
Example: PiS and PO have candidates in every constituency (40), but they nominate only 87 and 85 candidates; they do not nominate in every constituency as many candiates as there are seats (100).--Bancki 15:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: On Actualités du bicameralisme  is stated:
Decembre 2009: Le Premier ministre polonais annonce une réforme de la Constitution prévoyant l'élection des sénateurs au scrutin uninominal  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.179.127.246 (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Elections in Poland

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1998 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#1998 Polish local elections until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Andrei (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1998 Polish local elections" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1994 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#1994 Polish local elections until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Andrei (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1994 Polish local elections" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1990 Polish local elections. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#1990 Polish local elections until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Andrei (talk) 14:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1990 Polish local elections" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bealls (Texas-based department store)

message: This is a great store, that ALWAYS has wonderful sales! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.43.79.28 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV