lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Young Avengers

message: The previous contents of this Talk Page have been archived. Any earlier discussion can now be found here. - IndigoSeptimus (talk) 02:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived Discussion 

message: I've depended on this page a lot for context/clarification over the last few months in my reading of the entire YA series (such a good read) and while I'm really grateful for the quality of the page, I feel like it could be even better with some tweaks and development. Areas for development that I plan to try and work on (help/other recommendations/ideas how to achieve this would be appreciated!): 
- Update the infobox to reflect Volume 2 issues/talent/collected editions/etc.
- Work on refining the intro and general tone/content of the page in relation to similar pages such as the Runaways/Teen Titans? (Where would be best to compare on Wikipedia?)
- Really refine the prose within the synopsis sections, potentially root around and improve linking articles that all share the exact same prose as this one
- Majorly cover Volume 2 as that hasn't been mentioned beyond one sentence and it's ten issues in
- Expand "supporting characters" (look for precedent of this on Wiki) 
- Introduce section on cultural impact/critical response. I'm planning to do some academic writing on the series so I'll be sure to build any good sources I find into this section, think the series really has a meaningful connection to culture in terms of youth culture/social networking/queer and adolescent identity so it'd be great to reflect that.
I'll probably reach out to the WikiProjects connected to this page to ask for their advice assistance too but I thought it'd be worth laying this all out here in case anyone watches this page and wanted to get involved? - IndigoSeptimus (talk) 02:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Development
Talk:History of warfare

message: We need an article about a period of warfare that would fit inbetween Early and Modern warfare.  EMW only covers up to the 18th century and Modern warfare seems to only cover the 20th century.  This leaves the 19th century unrepresented, which is odd, considering that was the century that gave way to the development of the repeating rifle, revolvers, gatling guns, etc.--Kross | Talk 23:58, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We could also expand the modern war article to cover much of the nineteenth century. The American Civil War and the Franco-Prussian war are both quite modern, early modern should cover everything up to the end of the Napoleonic Wars. - SimonP 00:16, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

text: While everyone figures out how to do this, I created a stopgap period called Industrial Warfare (A working title, which we can easily change) to cover the Nineteenth Century and Twentieth Century (Prior to 1980s).  BTW, my votes are for Gunpowder warfare (1500-1800), Industrial warfare (1800-1980), Modern warfare (1980-).  The major cutoffs between the first and second period are massive conscript armies, rifling, and total war.  Between the second and third, the Revolution in Military Affairs which saw the return to small professional militaries and the widespread use of computers.  I'll expand on this more if anyone's interested. Palm_Dogg 09:35, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need more distinctions, warfare has generally kept pace or led technology, and has thus changed just as rapidly.  I would personally suggest we follow the military equipment categories and go with Industrial warfare, World War I warfare, World War II warfare, Cold War warfare and then Modern warfare.  Perhaps even an article on what speculations there are on Future warfare as well. Oberiko 01:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  new period of warfare needed? 

message: The section by people seems somewhat awkward to me, should these entries perhaps rather be organized chronologically? (or be more specific). As it now stands, for example Arab warfare is a difficult concept, should this involve asymmetrical warfare in the Israel-Palestine conflict of today  or Iraqi usage of Scuds in 1991 vs. warfare during the crusades. Should a British warfare omit the Royal Navy during WWII or Falklands war to allow for an entry regarding the Spanish Armada? I'd suggest other categories be expanded, or specific timeframes should be added (such as the entries Roman warfare and ancient Greek warfare). Ideas, comments? Scoo 15:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warfare sorted by "people"

message: this article says very very little about the history of warfare! Kingturtle 07:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It needs a lot of work. It also needs to be clearer that we do indeed have a detailed series of articles, which do have a fair amount of content. - SimonP 14:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  history?
Talk:Terfenol-D

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Terfenol. The final result was Redirect to Terfenol-D. --Deathphoenix 04:30, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This video at a point 34 or 35 minutes into the presentation states that Terfenol-D is extremely expensive, can be used for perturbing the strengths of a magnetic field by having it painted in a pattern onto a disk which is then rotated in front of a magnet in proximity to a pickup coil.  The coil will receive a varying strength magnetic flux from the nearby magnet, and in doing so induces AC electromotive force (Voltage) into the pickup coil. Presumably virtually no forces are exerted upon the disk so rotating the disk requires little effort, yet the modulation induced in the magnetic field going into the coil is huge, producing good energy output from the coil. The disk could be rotated by wind via rotor, or whatever sized small motor required to spin the light weight disk.
* Is there some source of info about how much this stuff costs?
* Where it is manufactured?
* Is it patented?
* Are there consumer applications in use that employ these methods?
* Does a RS that talk about these applications that could be mentioned in the article? Oldspammer (talk) 07:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: At a point 49m:00s into the video, an energy generation device prototype is shown that spins a Terfenol-D painted 33.3 RPM vinyl disk with holes cut in it that modulates the magnetic field going into a set of coils mounted statically on the top layer. The person narrating the image gives the size of the small motor that rotates the disk that is in the few milliwatts range. The device presumably generates a few kilowatts. The Terfenol-D paint required supposedly costs more than $3,000 (possibly per coil with 8 coils) mentioned somewhere earlier in the video. (If $3k per coil, that is $24k for the prototype device just for the Terfenol-D paint alone?) Oldspammer (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video that refers to the substance 
Talk:StarForce

message: windows 7 blocks the star force drivers after their installation.(at least the star force drivers in heroes of annihilated empires.) gangland`s drivers wont install in vista. that is all i know.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more likely that the version of StarForce included in those games uses drivers that are not compatible with those operating systems, rather than Microsoft specifically blacklisting them. You'll probably find that updated versions of StarForce won't have the problem you described. -XJDHDR (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  rejection from microsoft? 

message: I've gone through the product list, simplifying it and removing the obvious marketing-speak throughout.  This has also made it less than half as long!  If anybody thinks I cut too much, please add back in what you think is needed, rather than doing a full revert.  Thanks Cosmogoblin (talk) 15:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product list
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Dr Zen/Evidence

message: It appears Zen has gone on another hiatus. See his user page. His last four edits are telling as well. See  (articles: fuck off cunt bye). TIMBO (T A L K) 01:55, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Zen farewell 

message: :LOL. Anyone would think that "consensus" meant "raging dispute"! (User:203.103.62.24)
Cool Hand Luke 06:15, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment removed from Tony's evidence
Talk:Jubal Harshaw

message: I'm not disputing the necessity of adding Jubal's (Heinlein's) quotes to Wikiquote, but I think they should be left in this article as well because they add to the understanding of the character. I had intended on doing something similar for the majority of Heinlein's characters listed (as well as others that I will probably add, and characters I am familiar with by other authors.) ... I note that it is common occurence to allow one quotation on author pages, etc. I'd like to at least do the same on character pages as well, if consensus agrees. JubalHarshaw 05:14, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations

message: It seems like something very easily googleable, and is mostly just quotes. Also, the first review is missing a closing quotation mark and I'm not sure where it should be placed because the that is linked as a reference is no longer available. Zpicey (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reception sessions are normal, so changed header. Otherwise,  well sourced, should stay. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the reviews section necessary?
Category talk:Climate history

message: The proposal on WP:CFD to rename from "Category:History of climate" to something else was not accepted.
Shouldn't this be "history of the climate" or "climatic history" - SimonP 04:05, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
* I vote Keep as is.  Climatic history sounds like what a novel has somewhere in the middle.  I don't see how adding an article helps the title much. --ssd 00:11, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And come to think of it, this is at the crux of my problem with the climate articles (in terms of naming conventions and structure). Rhetorically, "climate change" is a perfect category for documented events. The "little ice age" was "a climate change." The "Medieval warm period" is a "climate change." But then again, "Snowball earth" is a theory of "climate change," not an actual climate change (right?). The problem is, you can't say "Climate Change is the current change in climate." Nor can you say "Global Warming is the study of the warming of the globe." The nomenclature in climatology is very messed up. —Ben 11:36, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived renaming discussion

message: * Set up merge. Reasons: categories are essentially redundent, but "History of climate" is more inclusive. :Category:Paleoclimatologists should be retained and point here. :Category:Climate change should be disentangled; either both should be valid categories in :Category:Climatology and the present cat also in :Category:Historical geology, or present cat should go into Climate change (as this is more likely to be a first-stop category) in addition to Historical geology categories. Dysmorodrepanis 03:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[:Category:Paleoclimatology]] here?
Talk:Asia (Roman province)

message: ==Untitled==
In general hello I think that the article is good and informative, but I do have a couple of suggestions.  In the first paragraph, you might want to add "211 BC" so we are clear from the start what time period is being referrenced.  Also, I would suggest maybe moving the geography section up, or at least painting a better picture of where the province is up front, again to establish context from the start.  I think providing more wiki-links would also be really helpful.  Providing wiki links for people (Mithridates VI, Attalus III) will allow you to reference them w/o spending a lot of time describing who they were and what they did.  This could also be helpful for places and sub-regions as well.  ALl in all, a very solid article though.65.185.189.131 15:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: In general hello I think that the article is good and informative, but I do have a couple of suggestions.  In the first paragraph, you might want to add "211 BC" so we are clear from the start what time period is being referrenced.  Also, I would suggest maybe moving the geography section up, or at least painting a better picture of where the province is up front, again to establish context from the start.  I think providing more wiki-links would also be really helpful.  Providing wiki links for people (Mithridates VI, Attalus III) will allow you to reference them w/o spending a lot of time describing who they were and what they did.  This could also be helpful for places and sub-regions as well.  ALl in all, a very solid article though.65.185.189.131 15:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be helpful if the Geography section mentioned a single line relating the Roman province to current nations and national boundaries. EaswarH 02:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:New Taiwan dollar

message: Now in this article the country of Taiwan is written as its formal name, but this country is commonly called Taiwan, and because both the island and the castle are located in the same place as the country of Taiwan, we have a discussion about calling it Taiwan rather than its formal name. Mamiamauwy (talk) 15:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In this article, @LHD, a user who changed the country of Taiwan to its official name, is asked to participate in the discussion. Mamiamauwy (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Taiwan may refer to "island, "province", or "alternative name of R.O.C. for foreigners", and the three are different ranges. It is NATIONAL CURRENCY of R.O.C. NOW, and was LOCAL CURRENCY of PROVINCE BEFORE. For disambiguation, using formal national name in the article & Infobox at the first time is appropriate. --LHD (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

text:  BTW, I changed X) I recover it to the old revision before 2023-08-10, which used the "Republic of China (Taiwan)" for a long time. Since 2023-08-10, a vandal's sockpuppet Marcslab removed "Republic of China" frequently, and was blocked finally. And  I notice that Mamiamauwy is blocked in Korean Wikipedia now. --LHD (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: new 1000 yuan taiwan history 124.104.52.97 (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1000 yuan taiwan history
Talk:John Wayne Gacy

message: This article list Norwood Park Township as “close” to Chicago. It was actually incorporated into Chicago in 1893, so it is a Chicago neighborhood, not a suburb and is “in” Chicago, not near it. 2607:FB91:2236:C8E3:181C:E48D:9906:7F6E (talk) 22:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwood Park Township 

message: I could be wrong, but I think Gacy stuffed his victim's throats to muffle their screams, not necessarily to kill them. Shouldn't this be mentioned? Do the sources clarify this? Not saying that they didn't die by asphyxiation, but it could have been an accident. LittleJerry (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally he did, yes. Those wads of cloth/clothing were wound and lodged deep in the rear of the mouths and blocking the upper trachea and esophagus of the victims, however. Cahill's book states Stein ruled the cause of death of these victims as asphyxiation. If memory serves me correct, Stein ruled that twelve victims found in the property - plus Piest - died of asphyxiation. Landingin was found with his own underwear in his throat; he asphyxiated on his own vomit (reflux lodged back into his bronchi) as a result of the body's response to the gag.--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't the defense attorneys claim that almost all of the victims (including Piest and Landingin) were killed by the "rope trick", and clothing in their throats was just padding added postmortum to block fluids from draining out of their mouths? Randomuser335S (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death by asphyxiation 

message: Kyle Sullivan said in the "Quiet on Set" documentary that All That dialogue coach/sex offender Brian Peck and John Wayne Gacy were pen pals. Should that be mentioned in the article? Thebirdlover (talk) 22:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that should be included here. In my opinion, it's just an extremely trivial bit of information that has no relevance to Gacy's case. Due to his pseudo-celebrity status, scores of people correspond with him on death row, and Peck is far from unique in that regard. Randomuser335S (talk) 16:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian Peck 

message: Please add in the section Films and media
* The track "Pogo" by the Italian band Gray Hat, released in 2024, focuses on the figure of John Wayne Gacy, drawing a parallel between the killer and the arrogance of powerful individuals in the world. 
Sources: Spotify Link, Explanation of the song made by the band (in Italian)
: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Spotify and Instagram are not reliable sources, and in this case not secondary either. For the song to be considered notable enough to be added to the page, you would need to prove said notability with sources. Irltoad (talk) 08:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2024
Talk:Key server (cryptographic)

message: This section is really confusing in my opinion. It looks like PGP is somehow less secure than the whole PKI? There's no difference between publishing certificates/keys which are public. This sounds like a typical security by obscurity, and it's sounds weird. Every  security system can be broken and PGP is not an exception. If the attacker cannot obtain your public key, means nobody can means there's no way for the people in the Net to tell who you are, means PGP/PKI is useless - anonymous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.41.16.26 (talk) 09:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weaken security

message: This section seems to say that "PGP Global Directory" (which I admit I have never heard of)
solves the problem of not proving ownership of the keys (and indirectly that this is
a problem).  Is this a widely shared view?  People who use PGP typically require a photo ID
to prove ownership — that's significantly stronger than having control over an e-mail account
for a few minutes.
JöG (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with "Problems with keyservers" 

message: I'm having a hard time telling what the relationship is between the original thesis and the patent assigned to Network Associates. Are these for the same thing? (It seems like yes.) In that case, was one of them prior art that the other stole? Were they independent developments? Was Horowitz himself involved with Network Associates? What's the timing?
Thanks for any clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thousandlegs (talk • contribs) 16:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent timeline confuses me
Talk:El Santo

message: I am removing JCVH from the list of movies, as the Santo in the film was not the original Santo. 24.163.66.210 19:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus Christ Vampire Hunter 

message: Well, it´s about El Santo´s funeral.
I´ve heard it was the biggest funeral of ALL Mexico. Can someone confirm me and give me some facts about that?
Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.142.144.131 (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: uewusgjwheghiurghwuirutiaghuijkajwehqwwwwrjqfnewj qyeugf7qyehwr gfwqeyatsgfwya7ru9       eyutyq3wueyrqi3wuetsyiwiusytuyewursth27358245i72839fewityhurwtguehrufhyergduyteurhtvuye5hrrgnesriuyw4ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhurg7w48eytuiwyurk3wyeut43yewt 2601:58B:1400:D800:5001:51BE:86C8:D4C1 (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a question 

message: I created an infobox. If anyone has information I couldn't find for the template, please add it. -- Kevin Browning 08:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox. 

message: this website has a buch of crap!!! If your doing a project dont use this website cause you can even change the page yourselves!! So I would advise you not to use this website so you wont get a bad grade for getting the wrong answer because trust me you will! I already have!!!
                            Sincerely,
                              Someone Trying To Help  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.16.37.91 (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: THat's what you get for using WIkipedia instead of the sources listed on the page - Wikipedia can be changed, not the sources. ANd what's wrong with the El Santo article?  MPJ -DK  06:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  a bunch of crap is wat this website has for some of their words(crappy definition section) 

message: In the introduction, Guzmán is referred to as a "luchador enmascarado", which is then translated as "professional wrestler" in English. However, "to mask" in Spanish is "enmascarar", and therefore "enmascarado" would be more along the lines of "masked". He should then be a masked wrestler rather than a professional wrestler. Should this be changed, or is this some kind of wrestling slang where someone that is masked is a professional?
Obergen (talk) 01:20, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish mistranslation? 

message: the intro has been set up In the correct format for someone as beloved as El Santo was. please STOP changing it to match your liking w1n5t0n (talk) 21:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not to my liking, it's to policy. See WP:PW/BIO. If you don't like it, get a consensus. JTP (talk • contribs) 22:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  the intro  
Talk:Five Cs of Singapore

message: Cute. Not an encyclopedia topic though. --Wetman 06:41, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didnt expect this to appear either, but hey, it does say alot on Singaporean materialism. ;) In fact, there was a major feature in the local paper on this issue, so hopefully there will be someone willing to fully develop on this. :D --Huaiwei 17:50, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it a current joke? When was its popularity peak? Samnikal 01:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been around at least 16-18 years (when credit cards and country clubs started appearing) and the phase is still widely used today. It is used not only in jokes, but also to refer to the competitiveness in society, personal ambitions, etc. --Vsion 04:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled