lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Klaipėda Central Stadium

message: The info is absoluely false. It's Klaipėda city central stadium--86.100.205.18 (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lehigh Acres, Florida

message: Lehigh is fo da newly wed and da nearly dead  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.41.184.116 (talk) 03:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I stumbled upon this place on Google Earth (ironically searching for the abandonned neighbourhood of Love Canal, NY) and noticed that there are miles and miles (and miles) of roads with few (if any) houses, including entirely empty neighbourhoods. What's the deal?? -M.Nelson (talk) 16:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The (nearby) Buckingham Field article states that "The street grid built over the location of the former runways remained undeveloped for some period of time, before eventually being partially filled in with houses, it remains, however, about 90% unoccupied." Perhaps this should be put into this article? -M.Nelson (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Houses? 

message: When LeHigh Acres popped up on the search bar, it stated "Municipality in Florida", I Tried changing the Description but it won't let me. Can someone change this? AndrewSan12 (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it. It does seem to be a unique entity in Florida. Thank you for pointing this out. Donald Albury 01:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. AndrewSan12 (talk) 01:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  LeHigh Acres a Municipality?
Talk:Manas-vijnana

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&safe=active&q=manasvij%C3%B1%C4%81na&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws
--124.78.213.158 (talk) 08:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  scholar info about the topic
Talk:Killinghall

message: This article is in need of tidying up. The census information is supposed to be in tables, but whoever did it did not get it right and has not corrected it. If i get a chance i will do it, but help may be needed form the community, please.Rimmer1993 (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Removed this from the page because it's lengthy and not really germaine, so I've taken it and am pasting it here if you want to take anything from it, it has no place on the main page, but data from it could be used (not sure how reliable it is, but that's up to you).  Mtaylor848 (talk) 02:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: It's here if you want it
Talk:Pool of Twilight

message: I've just put in basic information concerning the book's relation to the rest of the "Heroes of Phlan" series, the books ISBN number and other very basic information. Included is the blurb from the back of the book, which the CorenSearchBot has noted appearing elsewhere. Sothwyr 21:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely.  It's a copyright violation.  Removing. -- But|seriously|folks  06:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic Information
Talk:Patriotism (1966 film)

message: Source does not state Toho as the production company, but as the company that distributed the film much after its premiere. What is the source stating otherwise? Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Toho

message: Laibach used a clip from this film in a music video. That should be worth mentioning.--Mr. 123453334 (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laibach? 

message: Patriotism or the Rite of Love and Death is the actual name of the film. The page should be retitled thus.--Mr. 123453334 (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page retitle?
Talk:Harlene Anderson

message: I deleted material which had no citation to support it mainly because it seemed incoherent and run-on.  (PeacePeace (talk) 23:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed some garbled [not garboled - LOL] material 

message: I deleted material which had no citation to support it mainly because it seemed incoherent and run-on.  Someone may be able to make it coherent and add a source.(PeacePeace (talk) 23:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed some garbled [not garboled - LOL] material 

message: I edited the lead section, added sections on her education, research, career, published books, and representative journal articles, and added in new references. Squid31 (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added new sections and information
Talk:Paramartha

message: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=paramartha+%E7%9C%9F%E8%AB%A6&hl=zh-TW&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E5%B0%8B&lr=
--222.67.205.65 (talk) 10:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese translation of the term is based on the following....
Talk:Sakadagami

message: This part of the four steps to enlightenment needs more information. tumaru 13:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more info 

message: I'm not sure why this page is called "Sakadagami". The stem form, which is the usual way of citing both Pāḷi and Saṃskṛta words, is P. sakadāgāmin or Skt sakṛdāgāmin. In Pāḷi sakadāgāmī is the masculine nominative singular. However we often speak of once-returners in the plural sakadāgāmino. I presume there is some convention amongst editors of the Buddhist sections on whether technical terms should be cited in Pāḷi or Saṃskṛta or Chinese or whatever. Jayarava (talk) 08:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the article
Talk:Saṃbhogakāya

message: Slightly odd. Lead entirely about Tibetan Buddhism. Body entirely about Chan. Peter jackson (talk) 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrangement
Talk:M. Shayne Bell

message: I was surprised to find no page yet for this writer. The article had nine previously red links to it on creation - a good sign it was needed. - Reaverdrop (talk/nl) 21:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No page yet for M. Shayne Bell?!

message: Just came across some info re:Drew and need to get in contact with Shayne....if anyone can pass this message on, that would be great!  Thanks.  
202.63.41.23 (talk) 09:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact needed

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned things up a bit and expanded the content. There are still things missing (especially in the poetry section), but it's much more complete than it was before. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Samvriti

message: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=zh-TW&q=Samvrti+%E4%BF%97%E8%AB%A6
--222.67.205.65 (talk) 11:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A chinese translation of the term is based on the following.....
Talk:Seven Factors of Awakening

message: I'm impressed by the article as it stands today, April 23, 2015.  It's much better than start class, and on a body of understanding important within Buddhism.   
Ocdcntx (talk) 23:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better than start class, and important
Talk:Threefold Training

message: In the first section, 'higher mind' has 'mind' hyperlinked to wikipedia page for samadhi. While the explanation of adhicitta-sikkhā is certainly connected to samadhi, 'mind' refers to 'citta' - so why hyperlink 'mind' to samadhi? Perhaps link it instead to 'citta' or to nothing at all? --Puthujjana (talk) 21:45, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'higher mind' link
Talk:Trailokya

message: The key concepts section is too large. I'm going to go through it and pick out some of the terms which only apply to specific sects (i.e. satori and kensho in Zen, Bardo in Tibetan Buddhism, etc..). ☯  Zenwhat (talk) 02:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Out of curiosity, might you be referring to the :Template:Buddhism topics transcluded at the bottom of the page? Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 02:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, yeah. Oops. I accidentally added this comment on the wrong talkpage. See my comments here: Template talk:Buddhism topics ☯  Zenwhat (talk) 02:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I agree with your assessment and applaud your effort.  Best, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Key concepts" is too large
Talk:Harriet Klausner

message: Thanks for you who worked on this page. It should be a model for articles on minor persons. It gives the facts people are looking for without wasting their time with a lot of controversy and trivia. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice article

message: According to WP's standards a person, or other topic, becomes notable when it is covered in depth by secondary sources. To me, Ms Klausner seems to pass this test.  Notability is not decided by how worthwhile a person's activities, or "claim to fame" is. Steve Dufour (talk) 01:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I happen to agree with you. I think she is especially notable because of her extraordinary claims (which have not, to my knowledge, ever been verified) and the controversy which surrounds them. --SandChigger (talk) 07:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

text: But is she continuously notable? She did have a few articles about her, but there haven't been that many recently. I did a search & only found one article in the past few years. She's interesting to me, but not really all that notable, to be honest. If she's worthy of an article, then why not many of the other people who have acquired their 15 minutes of fame & gotten noticed?  Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: Has there been anything in the news recently about Harriet having suffered a major cerebrovascular event and currently experiencing linguistic deficits as a result? Her "reviews" certainly don't seem to be written by a native speaker of American English. --SandChigger (talk) 06:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a native speaker of American English 

message: Why no mention of The Harriet Klausner Appreciation Society and its investigation of HK? That is why she is really notable. Read http://harriet-rules.blogspot.com/2012/10/she-works-hard-for-money.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.128.187 (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harriet Klausner Appreciation Society investigation 
Talk:Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society

message: I linked The White Paper into Emergency Medical Services.Yelruh 21:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In most of the world, White Paper has a generic meaning. The possible confusion should be addressed. Avalon (talk) 08:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: White Paper

message: Historical documents are almost always of low importance for the WPMED project as a whole.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: okay thanks, was unsure about this, as the White Paper is one of the most important one to come out of the government as related to emergency medicine and EMS, Cheers -- Medicellis (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem.  You can always ask at the assessment page if you are particularly uncertain.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Harry Graf Kessler

message: The last two paragraphs of "Later years" are a lightly edited Google translation of the corresponding portion of the German Wikipedia page. Fatidiot1234 (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: There is some leftover/broken syntax in the second paragraph. And a missing full-stop. And why "curiously"? Everything is c.
Nicely chosen picture. But why not explain? Seems not to be covered by biographical text. Don't be brilliant.
Is there need for signature? These hints should come from anybody; first, from the author of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.77.85.123 (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Family" Section; the picture
Talk:Niagara Amusement Park & Splash World

message: The park is now named "Niagara Amusement Park and Splash World". The page should be renamed to reflect. Unfortunately I am unable to make this change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrencp22 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs to be renamed 

message: Guessing at the number of rides a park has doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Hopefully someone can get a source to reference on here that indicates precisely how many rides it has? --JBC3 (talk) 19:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total number of rides 

message: The town of grand island has buyers to submit proposals. Please stop changing the title. 
We are fully aware of the vandalism here Funisback (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no vandalism going on here, this is a content dispute and the other editor is an experienced editor. You may want to read WP:COI, if you have better sources to point to then you can cite them. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop reverting the page please 

message: The header needs to be more than one sentence, as it is too short and gives little to no information. It should not tell all of the information that's in the article, but it needs to be more than one sentence. For examples of well-written headers that give readers a preview of the article's information, refer to Cedar Point and Kentucky Kingdom, both are classified as good articles by Wikipedia. BlueShirtz (talk) 3:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the header
Talk:Movie Park Germany

message: I'm deleting the phrase "with real movie studios" from the introduction, because there are no references for that major fact anywhere in the article, and I was unable to find any reference anywhere online, to the park having "real movie studios" in it or as part of the complex.
As a Los Angeles-based filmmaking professional with 15 years of experience, I can interpret "real movie studios" in these ways: Either the park houses film production companies' offices on-premises, or professional movie sound stages where productions for public release are shot, as , or, at the narrowest interpretation, sound stages that could' be used for professional filmmaking. I haven't found evidence of any of that.
I suppose any street-corner shop that makes birthday movies and has a room with a camera could say they are a "real movie studio", but I don't think that definition would be the bar for a Wikipedia article.
Binba (talk) 21:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Real movie studios?"

message: These 2 sections repeat the same information. Should these sections be combined, or should one of them be removed? SMT153 (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Areas" and "Attractions" sections
Talk:Harry Pollitt (engineer)

message: I've manufactured a date of birth for Harry. All the online sources give a date a year earlier, as do Hughes & Jackson, but that doesn't reconcile to the registration of the birth (under the name Henry and with his mother shown in Find My Past correctly as Crompton) in the first quarter of 1866 in Ashton, which is however quite compatible with a birth in late 1865 so he was born on Boxing day and registered the following year. That is quite consistent with his ages shown in the  censuses from 1871 to 1891 and his application to join the Institute of Mechanical Engineers shown in Hughes and Jackson. In the 1901 census he appears to have lost a year, but he was about to marry a much younger woman so that is hardly surprising.
If I am mistaken, the family omitted to register his birth for a year and under reported his age in the census returns for the next twenty years. Optymystic (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Now confirmed correct date of birth as 26th December 1865 by purchasing a birth record from the General Register Office. I have attached this to a tree on Ancestry.com Optymystic (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Talk:Kettlewell

message: There are conflicting sources regarding the age of the church, here it says 1885 , while here it says 1820 .  Any ideas?  I want to write an article regarding the church, but I won't start until I've a good basis for facts. Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The first link says "a Georgian church in 1820, which, saving the tower, was demolished in 1883 to make way for the present church." so the later date is for the present church that replaced the earlier one. Keith D (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting sources
Talk:Pure Theory of Law

message: This page should link to this page in German: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reine_Rechtslehre.
The page in German, "Reine Rechtslehre", links to the English page on "basic norm," which is an error.
: Problem solved --Ingramhk (talk) 12:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have completely rewritten this article, which had contained many errors, and have extended the list of references.  I have included in that list an article of my own, 'The Critical Legal Science of Hans Kelsen', not (I hope) out of hubris but because it is the only nearly up-to-date survey of the Pure Theory of Law that is available in English - or, to the best of my necessarily limited knowledge, at article length in any language.  This article covers every vital source except the English translation of Allgemeine Theorie der Normen, now published as General Theory of Norms.  If anybody wants to make a substantive change to my Wikipedia article, let us discuss first.  I fully agree with the administrators' request (as to the previous version) for fuller referencing, but - as I think can be seen from my earlier article - Kelsen's output even as to the Pure Theory was very substantial and the secondary literature is vast.  I have therefore allowed summary to take precedence.--Wikiain (talk) 05:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record: this editor has a conflict of interest (see connected contributor statement above). The original rewrite by Wikiain added 12 kb in rev. 335417594 of 06:53, 2 January 2010, which was the first of , followed subsequently by 16 small edits from 2010 through 2017. On 2 Feb 2010 after Wikiain's first 9 edits, the article was 20,956 bytes; after their last edit on 18 Nov 2017 it was 28,366 bytes, with almost all of the increase coming from indeffed editor 's 19:53, 6 August 2013 edit (diff). Mathglot (talk) 21:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 rewrite 

message: It is somewhat strange that František Weyr is not mentioned even once.
http://books.google.com/books?id=mP2eHYz0xngC&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202
http://www.muni.cz/people/63444/management_history  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.100.182.13 (talk) 05:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right, though the omission was benignly intentioned.  The importance of the Brno School should certainly be recognised.  The trouble is that very little about them is available in English and the source you cite is rather encyclopedic.  There is a source in German, Band 5 of the series published by the Hans Kelsen-Institut <http://www.univie.ac.at/staatsrecht-kelsen/schriftenreihe.php>.  I look forward to getting a chance to read it.  Bde 30 and 32 may also contribute.  But I have to buy these volumes myself!  --Wikiain (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Kelsen and Weyr were also publishing Revue Internationale de la Théorie du Droit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.100.182.13 (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  František Weyr
Talk:Al-Hurr ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Thaqafi

message: We're all perfectly aware that al ("the") in al-Hurr ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Thaqafi is not capitalized, but not to capitalize it at the beginning of an English sentence is no more than an affectation. --Wetman 09:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An affectation 
Talk:Harry Wong

message: Education Icon Harry K. Wong Passes Away (effectiveteaching.com) https://www.effectiveteaching.com/userfiles/uploads/Guides/HarryWong.pdf 
Harry Wong
October 15, 1952 — April 22, 2023
Harry Wong, 70, born on October 15, 1952, in Los Angeles, passed away on April 22, 2023.   The family is deeply saddened and shocked by his sudden death.
Harry was predeceased by his parents, Nam and Lee Dick Jeow, his brother Henry and sister Kim. He is survived by his two brothers, Harvey and Hubert, his two children, Matthew (Kaylee) and Nicole (Russell), and his four grandchildren Ava and Evelynn and Elizabeth and Samuel.
Arrangements are under the care of Forest Lawn, Glendale, CA. Slimstar007 (talk) 22:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Wong passed away February 22, 2024
Talk:Babar Ahmed (terrorist suspect)

message: This needs tidying up and better citation than "www.freebabarahmed.com". For example, the allegation that he was tortured while in the custody of the British police. 222.152.12.200 22:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, please feel free to help! Robert C Prenic 22:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the relevant cleanup tags, and will try and tidy up the article over the next few days. Scholarcs 23:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

message: *Changed "British Citizen and Muslim" to "British Muslim".
*Removed "'alleged'". He is not 'alleged' to be a suspect - he is a suspect. 
*Removed "without trial or charge", as he was charged with terror crimes two months later by a US court. 
:I have stated that British authorities has not charged him or given him trial althogh still hold him in custody. It came later that the US wanted him so they are keeping him arrested in US charges not British. It needs to remain "without trial or charge" from the British police and only LATER did the US charge him. Robert C Prenic 07:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Human Rights groups hold rallies and everything for him, check their websites in the UK and also BBC News for sources. I will add later. Robert C Prenic 07:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If we want to include such information, it should include who sees it as a violation of his human rights - ie "his supporters and *relevant Human Rights group (reference)* see this as a violation of his human rights". "Many" is too ambiguous and does not tell the reader who holds this opinion. Scholarcs 11:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I have revamped this part including the alleged photographic evidence, BBC reportings on this assault, the IPCC reference and the BBC article where it was rejected. I hope this covers it. Robert C Prenic 07:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleared up some spelling and grammar here, and also rewritten it so it doesn't include "photographic evidence" - as this term implies it provides definitive proof of the alleged torture. Scholarcs 11:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Put this alleged incident into its own area. See above Robert C Prenic 07:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of edits
Talk:Vaishali (ancient city)

message: It has been discovered that this book:
*Gupta, Om. Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Gyan Publishing House, 2006. , 9788182053892. 
Contains significant amounts of material plagiarized from Wikipedia articles. (Some other books from the same publisher also have this problem). There is no practical way of determining which material came from Wikipedia, and which came from other sources. Further, widespread plagiarism is an indication of poor scholarship. For those reasons, and according to Wikipedia policy, WP:CIRCULAR, I will deleting all citations to the book. However I will not delete the material that cites it, as there's no indication that the material is inaccurate. For more background, see WP:RSN#Circular references: Gyan Publishing and ISHA Books, or the archive after it goes there.   Will Beback  talk   23:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh