Talk:Environmentally friendly

message: This article is titled "environmentally friently".  All regulators and standards organizations recommend NOT using this vague term.  It is only used (and abused) in advertising.  Should this article be deleted? Rlsheehan (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If we are to keep this article, it should be limited to the first sections that discuss the limitations of the term "ennvironmentally friendly".  The Methods section tries to add validity to a term already invalidated. I have thus removed Methods. Rlsheehan (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very interesting point you bring up here, Rlsheehan. Do you have a source for this info that it is not recommended to use? I am trying to improve the quality of the eco-friendly dentistry page. It is very hard to write about it in a neutral point of view, and I would like to establish context for the term. --Asktheboh96 (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Environmentally friendly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212115647/http://ec.europa.eu:80/environment/ecolabel/pdf/meetings/draftmin0905.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/pdf/meetings/draftmin0905.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701234814/http://www.energyrating.gov.au:80/man1.html to http://www.energyrating.gov.au/man1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070713095412/http://www.energyrating.gov.au:80/star.html to http://www.energyrating.gov.au/star.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070713103618/http://www.energyrating.gov.au:80/con3.html to http://www.energyrating.gov.au/con3.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Environmentally friendly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705195538/http://epn.dk/privatokonomi/investering/article1374993.ece to http://epn.dk/privatokonomi/investering/article1374993.ece
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/pdf/meetings/draftmin0905.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.energyrating.gov.au/man1.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.energyrating.gov.au/star.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.energyrating.gov.au/con3.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703110036/http://www.energystar.gov.au/ to http://www.energystar.gov.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jialeijiang (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 15

message: The information is pretty outdated an bare and there are now more articles on the topic, so it should be easy to add some additional information. The current sections consists of only two sentence and is backed up with four sources. Halfrated (talk) 15:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oceania Addtion 

message: Question to the assignees: What do you personally think you added in terms of "environmental friendliness"? I'll tell you my impression: Almost nothing at all. Simply listing the environmental problems in the global regions and repeating words doesn't cut it. The overall result is, frankly, not good. Wonder what your supervisor had to say about this. -- Kku (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: What?