Talk:X264

message: Can someone please explain how the GPL is "incompatible with the MPEG-LA patent licenses in jurisdictions that recognize software patents"?  If there is an incompatibility (what is that incompatibility?), shouldn't it be referenced on the GPL page? --MyOwnLittlWorld 02:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some patent issue with x264. That's why Debian removed it from their repositories. More than that, I don't know. --CCFreak2K (talk) 04:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The text is no longer there, and properly so.  Distribution issues can be affected by more things than than licence incompatibilities.  --NealMcB (talk) 17:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "may be incompatible with... patent licenses"

message: No...
x264 is a free software library for encoding video streams into the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format.
OR
x264 is a free software library for DEcoding H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video streams —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 157.193.48.16 (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the original proposed change. --NealMcB (talk) 17:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's both. --CCFreak2K (talk) 07:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both what? x264 is only an encoder, not a decoder.—J. M. (talk) 16:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "x264 is a free software library for encoding H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video streams" 

message: I think the capabilities section of the article is very confusing and needs a redesign. I created one here using a table. Please tell me what you think about it so I can improve it and include it in the article. M@RIX 19:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanx for the feedback. I fixed those mistakes and updated the article. There seems to a problem: "--partitions all" includes "--partitions i8x8" which is a Hight Profile feature. Should we move it to the other features section? M@RIX 07:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capabilities section redesign 

message: Wouldn't it be enough to just mention what Profile features it supports? and then append any extra features onto that...also listing all the CLI options is overkill (see WP:NOTMANUAL) - Xedaf (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I removed the table for now , though any x264-specific features should be added. - Xedaf (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  As far as capabilities go 

message: I'm having a hard time seeing why it was disputed. I only see facts... there isn't even anything that could be misconstrued as opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.83.201 (talk) 20:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality dispute 

message: I removed the tag
because I thought it wasn't needed any more. If anyone thinks it's still needed, feel free to put it back. Thebombzen (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional citations for verification 

message: As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the "X" in the "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X264" URL to be capitalized, since the name of the software is "x264". I would correct it myself, but am not sure how; and I thought that I might end up feeling the wrath of the Wikipedia editors if I did.
Damienivan (talk) 20:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a limitation of the MediaWiki software. -- Ned Scott 01:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is URL Capitalized? 

message: Please expand the history section: When was the first release? When did it start supporting the High Profiles? Things like that would be an interesting read.--146.52.211.177 (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First  release? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on X264. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727011550/http://handbrake.fr/details.php to http://handbrake.fr/details.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128061519/http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/589 to http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/589
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified