Talk:Danson House

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Danson House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225170850/http://homepage.ntlworld.com:80/welling.website/ to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/welling.website
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It occurred to me that maybe Danson Park and Danson House should be merged. I have just expanded Danson House with a much more detailed history of the site, there is a lot of crossover with the Danson Park article: history, geography, location, facilities etc. I think together they would make quite a nice article. Does anyone have an opinion on whether they should be merged? If so, should they be merged under the name Danson House or Danson Park? If not, what should the focus of the two articles be, given the large amount of crossover between the subjects? Jdcooper (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I would suggest Danson Park as the article title, as the park contains the house. Paul W (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts also. I'll leave it another 24 hours then if no-one objects I'll do the merge. Jdcooper (talk) 18:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

text: The problem is that more or less everything in the DH article also applies to DP. The history of the two are the same, the house and its grounds weren't even distinguished really until 1925. The DH article could switch to talking about the building after that point, but much of the interesting material about the house had already happened by that point (everything except the restoration). Similarly all the history of the estates could feasibly be included in the DP article.. Jdcooper (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

text: Funnily enough I am now swaying the other way! When I do the merge I will have a look to see if I can find more material about the park. Jdcooper (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

text: Ok, I'm happy with that rationale. I'll have a go at the Danson Park article now.. Jdcooper (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

text: My views haven't changed: I think we should keep them separate and not merge. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danson Park / Danson House 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Danson House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160201051747/http://www.bexley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10593 to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10593
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141225182301/http://www.bexley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10666 to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=10666
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://homepage.ntlworld.com/welling.website/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified