lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peroni Brewery

message: The following information is being presented in the form that was handed down to me by parents. My father, Jamar Tarr, is a direct descendant of Francesco Peroni.  My name is Justin Tarr and I am the great, great grandson of Francesco Peroni.    
The original founder of Peroni Beer was Francesco Peroni.  Francesco Peroni owned an orchard as well at the famous brewery. Francesco had a daughter named Luisa.  She angered her father when she met and fell in love with one of her father's orchard laborers name Luigi Delle Torre.  Luigi and Luisa moved to the United States and Luisa never saw her father again.  At some point in time, Luigi and Luisa had changed their last name to "Tarr".  More information on Francesco Peroni to follow.
V. Joe 17:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redacted information/ OR moved

message: Peroni began as an Italian beer, but the article fails to mention the current producer, South African Breweries.    Also, the tone of the article strikes me more as an advertisement than an encyclopedic article, with many invariably positive adjectives that add no real content.  I wouldn't be surprised to find this was written by someone connected with SAB or the Peroni brand.
71.60.109.149 (talk) 07:57, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns About Bias and Internal Consistency

message: A wholly duplicative template has been removed which adds nothing to the main SABMiller template. There is an ongoing discussion on the talk page of that template and the secondary template was therefore added improperly. Rangoon11 (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SABMiller template
Talk:Radio electronics

message: I suggest renaming this article "Radio frequency electronics". Ga2re2t 15:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: For most people working in the field, there is a lot of crossover between radio frequency and microwave frequency electronics. Most text books treat both subjects. The basic equations are usually identical for both areas, it is just the scale that changes. Ga2re2t 15:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microwave frequency electronics 

message: I think this article should be merged with RF engineering Isheden (talk) 12:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposed
Talk:Takumar

message: Any info about Thorium & Lanthanum used in the coating of the lens elements?109.167.192.232 (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe radioactive elements were using in the coating, but were actually part of the glass. http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/consumer%20products/cameralens.htm Icd (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radioactive coating 

message: Since when were Leica lenses made by Zeiss? If no-one can come up with evidence for this, I'll correct this line.....
Plingsby (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Zeiss?
Talk:ITF World Champions

message: For 1990
The DOT ratings calculation, which are a statistical measure of performance independant from human interference or opinion, give the following as the best 5 players at the end of 1990.
1. Ivan Lendl 2722
2. Stefan Edberg 2700
3. Boris Becker 2684
4. Mats Wilander 2649
5. Andre Agassi 2625
It's interesting to note that Edberg had very bad luck with the draws: he had to face Sergi Brugera in the 1st round of the Roland Garros and Alexander Volkov in the 1st of the US Open, a very dangerous player on that surface. On the down side, he couldn't even win a set in those matches. Finally, he lost both Roland Garros and US Open in 1st round.
116.49.69.244 (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ITF use the same "grand-slam consistency" logic in 1989 and 1990
Talk:Swell Maps

message: Apologies, but I don't seem to be able to begin a new topic/section. I know nothing about the band, having only just heard them for the first time on Last.fm this morning. 
Having said that, one thing immediately struck me as odd having read the biography, and noting the ages of some of the members when they died; if they were active between 1972 and 1980, and Epic Soundtracks was 37 when he died (his own entry gives his age at his death as 38, but that's largely irrelevant), then they formed when he was 12 or 13, and he was only 20 or 21 when they split! 
Now I've only heard them once, but my first impression was NOT of a bunch of lads who'd barely hit puberty, so I'm flagging up the dates as erroneous, possibly out by a decade or so. 
Could someone with better knowledge please confirm the dates as correct and, if they're not (as I STRONGLY suspect) please alter them accordingly…?
Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Margolotta (talk • contribs) 11:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Lists of tennis records and statistics/Archive 2

message: A proposal has been put forward to replace Tennis statistics with User:Fyunck(click)/SandboxTennisStats and name it List of non-Grand Slam tennis statistics and records. Thoughts, comments and/or votes are encouraged. SilkTork *YES! 08:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is unfortunately what has happened to the article that split away from this one at List of Grand Slam related tennis records. There are now charts like "least first round losses" and "career runner-ups." Very odd charts. The section User:Fyunck(click)/SandboxTennisStats#Open_era_records_.28non-Major.29 was there before the split as it is in List of Grand Slam related tennis records. I simply removed the records having to do with the Majors so as not to duplicate. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no real problem leaving it where it is now as a list of links that was created by SilkTork. At least we can find the articles. What I have now done is created my sandbox page and added it to that list so it compliments the one Francium12 created last year. However perhaps Tennis Statistics should be renamed as "List of tennis statistics"? or "List of tennis statistical articles"? Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 

message: I would like to add this page *Major professional tennis tournaments before the Open Era on List of lists of tennis records and statistics. 
How ? Thank you 
Fred30 13 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added added it per your request. Thanks for the suggestion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks you very much ! Fred30 13 (talk) http://fredtennis.blogspot.com/  —Preceding undated comment added 16:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Male tennis players with most singles major championship wins

message: Please comment about the proposed merger either here or at the tennis statistics talk page.  I am proposing that the merger occur on or after December 20, 2006.  Thanks.  Tennis expert 17:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think having 2 pages with the same data on them is stupid. The "tennis statistics" page is insanely long (81 Kbytes of tables), but the community around here needs to either break it apart totally or merge this page into it. Either-or. --Alvestrand (talk) 02:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of this article into the Tennis statistics article
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-06 Cat ownership

message: Some people say there is a group of Wikipedians called the Mediation Cabal...some say that they were purged by jealous admins...some people even say that they sent someone here to resolve this dispute...some people might even say I was sent by the cabal...I don't know. I see a heated argument and come running. I have read the debate above, and find it amusing. I love Wikipedia because it is the only place where one can find debates like this one. Now, I'm here to end this discussion. This debate is strictly over semantics and that is where I excel. I myself have interesting viewpoints on the usage of the word "owner" when talking about cats. I have several cats and I wouldn't say I "own" any of them; however, I also recognize the overwhelmingly common usage of the word "owner" and believe in an understandable vernacularized Wikipedia. Both parties in the debate above have probably exhausted themselves arguing their respective points. My own opinion lies somewhere in the middle, but unfortunately the English language has yet to come up with a word that truly describes the realationship between cats and those who adopt them as pets ('caregiver' is a little too mushy for my tates). However, English is a living language, if humans can overcome their specious superiority complex, perhaps someday there will be such a word. Until then, this page is the official authority on that subject. If any of the quarreling parties are willing to take this debate into a more controlled environment with someone who is truly trying to bring an amicable end to this debate, go here. If not, I will vanish into the shadows as quickly as I came. If you wish to talk to me in a more private setting, use my talk page. I hope you will take me up on my offer...Thanks!Antimatter---talk--- 17:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Reflex receiver

message: Where's the image gone? Any ideas? --Romanski 19:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image from Commons added. Peter-five (talk) 14:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The image is a "reflectional receiver" together with an audion. Both receiver ideas are mixed. Another image would be better. AndreAdrian (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 

message: The article refers to:
One example on the web gives drives a speaker with enough volume level for comfortable listening with ONE transistor. The experimenter does well to try such a circuit, which is very under represented in modern experimental electronics literature
I think we should link that example... if we can find it. And also add some technical references to back the contents of the article. Electronics is not my field,however... so my resources are few. Pablo Dotro - The Mage of the Many Shadows 17:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: To an experienced electronics person, this is an embarrassing piece. Firstly the term "Reflectional" is never used. The device is simply known as a "Reflex Receiver". 
Secondly, much fuss is made of the difficulty in building a Reflex, but this is misleading. Certainly the circuit must be correctly designed and constructed, but this is true with any circuit. A well designed Reflex will be well behaved, and is no more difficult to get working than any other complex set (a Superhet for instance).
The article would be much improved without the author's pretentious waffle regarding his difficulties in getting his set working.
Further, of the two reference schematics (FADA model 160, and GE model F40) radio, neither are Reflex sets, so why are they included?
Gutta Percha (talk) 05:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with all of these criticisms.  I think the article should be moved to Reflex receiver as this is the WP:COMMONNAME and as Gutta Percha says, "reflectional receiver" is never used. --ChetvornoTALK 21:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clumsy Article 

message: I propose the article be moved to Reflex receiver, with Reflectional receiver as a redirect.  "Reflex receiver" is the WP:COMMONNAME, here are some examples of usage: , , , ,  , . --ChetvornoTALK 08:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --ChetvornoTALK 22:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change article name to [[Reflex receiver]]?
Talk:Lords of Baux

message: I tried to make the names agree better with Wikipedia policy, and with redlinks elsewhere, and with one or two existing articles. I also revised the earlier genealogy (doubtfully) in line with the details given on the MedLands site (see external links): this makes the three lines descend from Bertrand I, not Bertrand II. If there is evidence against this, my apologies for creating confusion ... Andrew Dalby 17:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of 13 December 

message: I was tweaking some dates and noticed that "Line 1" made no sense: it ducked off through a female line in Sybille des Baux and disappeared into Valentinois, Clermont-Viennois, etc. I have replaced this part of Line 1 with the Counts of Avellino, who went extinct in male line in 1375. The last count's sister, Alice or Alix, inherited the county and died in 1426, according to FMG, which agrees better with the original author's "declared extinct in 1426" than the descent he himself posted. The genealogies at FMG, genealogy.euweb.cz, and sardimpex.com for this part of the family all agree. Furthermore, we can confidently assert that they were, in fact, Lords of Baux as well as Counts of Avellino, because in 1355, Robert of Durazzo seized Les Baux from Raymond III and caused quite a bit of trouble in Provence before being ejected again. Choess 01:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further changes
Talk:Tuned radio frequency receiver

message: The article says, Inside, [...] will be a series of large coils. These will sometimes be tilted slightly to reduce interaction between their magnetic fields.  But, the picture that follows shows three coils, at right angles to each other (which makes sense).  Perhaps the wording, sometimes be tilted slightly is too timid?  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tilted coils? 

message: Why is a CMOS book the reference for neutralization in vacuum tubes?  I don't have the book, but I would suspect that there should be more historical references around.  Gah4 (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  CMOS
Talk:Staple remover

message: Where I come from, we call them destaplers. 12.217.252.158 17:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a serious encyclopedia.  Please treat it that way.  What you did is vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Those names either need some cites, or they need to be removed.  I have lived in the United States my entire life, and never once have I heard anyone refer to a staple remover as a "staple serial killer". 144.211.101.118 (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staple Remover Names
Talk:Variable-width

message: It makes NO SENSE to have this as a link and then redirect it to typeface. 
   
Who thought that would be a good idea?
:Typeface is the article which has information on variable-width. As such, it makes perfect sense to edirect there. if you wish to write an article on variable-width, then fine, it will go here instread of a redirect. But there's no point in leaving a blank page here when anyone searching using the string "variable-width" will find information on the subject if it's a redirect instead. Grutness...wha? 01:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Red Terror (Ethiopia)

message: Are you kidding me with this article. This is a load of one-sided anti-communist propaganda. The famine that occured during Ethiopia's revolutionary period is some how a part of a "genocide," but the much worse famine that occured under Haile Selassie a few years earlier wasn't?? 
Killing people that take up arms against a government is "genocide"? Oh yeah? Why aren't the apartheid South African government or the Israeli government blamed for "genocide"? Why isn't the U.S. blamed for "genocide" for wiping out the Black Panthers??
Genocide is defined as 'the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group'. That doesn't apply here at all. Just because a kangaroo court in Addis Abba (under the new regime) says it, doesn't make it so. Redflagflying 17:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Democide was certainly committed, though the charge of genocide is less supported. Those killed during the 1984 famine are not included in the million-some total, however, while they usually are for other dictators (see e.g. Stalin). — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 07:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?? 

message: This article needs serious work.  It's not even close to representing an impartial point of view of what admittedly appears to be a dark period of Ethiopian history.  As an example, but far from being the only example, includes statements such as "Mengistu designed the relocation project that caused one of the worst humanitarian crises of the decade. From 1975–1978, Mengistu was responsible for the seventh worst genocide in world history.[citation needed]".   I don't care if you dig up a citation to "support" that statement, Wikipedia can't say that Mengistu was responsible for the seventh worst genocide in world history. Period.  Wikipedia can say that "Time magazine called the results of Mengistu's (in)actions the seventh worst example of genocide in world history." or something like that (please note that my example is a purely made up statement).  In its current form, this article is a very good example of an article that needs serious work.  98.208.96.56 (talk) 06:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-tagged NPOV

message: see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mengistu_Haile_Mariam#Amnesty_international.27s_.22estimate.22_of_terror_victims. for details. -Gucci81.88.116.27 (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Amnesty International Estimate" of 500K is likely to be apocryphal 

message: Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimes against humanity category removal
Talk:Tuanku Imam Bonjol

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Is Tuanku a royal title? In any case, I am sorting this fellow by the name of the state he helped found.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonetheless, he is one of those rewarded with the title National Hero of Indonesia. Rigadoun  (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is considered a national hero simply because he fought the Dutch, the despised colonialists. (Caniago 00:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Westwood One (1976–2011)

message: Anyone know ehere this name came from? 76.19.147.79 01:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 

message: The current one is now being used, but how about showing the original one used at the time of the takeover of the remnants of the Mutual Broadcasting System(where the "M" is atop the "W", as in "Mutual Broadcasting System/Westwood One Radio Networks")...Michaela92399 02:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Westwood One logo 

message: The separation agreement is available in WON's SEC filings .  121a0012 (talk) 21:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation from CBS 

message: How was it legal for Westwood to acquire NBC when they already owned Mutual given that NBC were once told they couldnt operate two radio networks ? 86.45.192.230 (talk) 19:48, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Antitrust concerns
Talk:Dewar benzene

message: *G.J. Städeler, J. Prakt. Chem. 102 (1868) 105.
*H. Wichelhaus, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 2 (1869) 197.
coined the name dewar benzene.--Stone 17:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The synthesis route of van Tamelen is correctly described as starting from photolysis of the cis-1,2-dihydro derivative of phthalic anhydride. However the diagram shows photolysis of phthalic anhydride itself, with an extra two hydrogens mysteriously appearing during the photolysis. I have checked the cited 1963 paper by van Tamelen and Pappas - our article text is correct but the diagram shows the wrong starting material. Can someone redraw the diagram? Dirac66 (talk) 03:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done V8rik (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good now. Thanks. Dirac66 (talk) 00:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect starting material in diagram
Talk:Microbroadcasting

message: the additional references to meme-builders looks like linkbait and vanity publishing, it does not explain the term.
maybe someone who agrees can delete the second part. 
reference to tetsuo kogawa added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.178.56.28 (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I'll go further than that: it looks like simply co-opting and misusing a word ("microbroadcasting") to pretend they invented something that already exists (works for small audiences/target markets).  Both small and large radio/TV production shops have been doing this stuff since the beginning of radio; some small shops have lasted decades producing this kind of work.  I'm deleting that whole section and its attendant spamlinks.  Meme-contriving WP:NEO.  I removed the section, the nonspecific spam links to companies, and their attendant inter-referential blogs that don't meet WP:EL. --Closeapple (talk) 00:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:CAM-D

message: I believe there is a bias supporting HD radio in the issues section and some of the information seems a bit fishy, especially that HD radio transmitters are cheaper than CAM-D, which is unreferenced and bias. Milonica (talk) 08:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding to the point that this article has an extreme bias supporting HD, this sentence bothers me: All planned production is for HD AM and FM receivers.. I added the fact tag to this because how can we possibly be certain that ALL radios in production will be for HD AM and FM. I am still able to buy analog radios at almost any electronics stores. I highly doubt anyone is ONLY producing HD radios. I may not support HD radio, but please don't add nonsense to an article that doesn't deal with HD. Milonica (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]