lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tashard Choice

message: This section just mentions his coaching career. That makes the title of this section, if not it's very existence, incorrect, no?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C6:CE80:1630:D966:C54D:25B0:E328 (talk) 09:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 
Talk:Waynesboro, Pennsylvania

message: An IP has removed the notable resident entry for Lil Skies ten times (over almost six months), initially with no summary , and more recently with the summaries "Person isn’t notable and not someone the town wants to be connected with"  and "He is not famous. Our town does not associate with him" . He is clearly notable and his connection with the town is sourced in his article. It does not matter if the editor likes him or his connection to the town. This is edit warring to remove appropriate content (and in the unlikely case that the editor really is speaking for the town this is a conflict of interest). Meters (talk) 04:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: IP blocked from this article for two years after repeating deletion. Meters (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lil Skies
Talk:Driscoll Catholic High School

message: While I personally hope that this school is saved, I should point out to read about what wikipedia cannot be used for.  Specifically, look at wikipedia not being used for advertising, nor as a soapbox, no matter how genuinely good the cause may be.  Please be sure to adhere to the policies on verifiability and reliable sourcing, which requires sourcing from neutral, third party sources.  No matter the outcome of efforts to save this school, please consider expanding this article. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes on closing
Talk:Birds Do It

message: Some moron keeps putting "Soon to be Birds Do it 2" on the page, which is highly unlikely die to Soupy's advanced age.   Loser.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.63.207.50 (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam
Talk:What Did You Do in the War, Daddy?

message: Can we have some material about the original, world war one, recruiting poster ( of, IIRC, a small girl looking up at her middle-class papa sitting comfortably in an arm chair?). Linuxlad (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: origins

message: "including the undisciplined but clever GIs"
What are GIs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.205.134 (talk) 10:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GIs
Talk:The Quiller Memorandum

message: Is Quiller British or American in the film ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: Perhaps based on having read the book, previous writers have tagged the neo-Nazi organization as Phoenix and the British group as SIS. There are also assumptions about who felt what. 
I just finished watching the movie, and I don't agree that SIS or Phoenix are clearly enough mentioned in the movie to justify the constant references. Perhaps an article on the book should have such details, but not the film. --Uncle Ed (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assumptions

message: Having also just watched the film (and having seen it several times before) I agree with the above point about Phoenix and SIS being overstressed. The plot summary also has some rather loose language in parts, eg. "Quiller refuses to answer Oktober's questions about the SIS operation". Firstly, "refuse" is wrong - he answers willingly but feigns having no knowledge of (nor any interest in) the names and events put to him. Secondly, the plot summary mentions "the SIS" here with no previous reference, leaving one wondering what SIS means? Plus there is no specific "operation" discussed - the questions are about operations generally ("Who is your contact? Where is your HQ?" etc). The summary continues later, "Quiller is horrified to see that Inge has been brought there too." No no no, he is not horrified at all - he remains self-controlled, his face and voice expressing no concern or emotion, and he pretends to remain disinterested in her fate (a pretence echoed in the film's closing scene in the school). The plot summary should also include Quiller's near-final remark, '"We caught them all, by the way... Well, perhaps not all of them..." - the film's clear inference that he now knows Inge was involved with Oktober's organisation, and wishes her to understand that he knows. This is the plot summary's downfall - it describes every little action in the film, but doesn't describe what's really going on at all. It rather omits the big picture entirely. Some element of interpretation is needed in the article too. Compare how Quiller departs at the close, tired and disappointed but not angry like Deighton's Harry Palmer, and not self-fulfilled like Fleming's James Bond. Just quietly walking away, tired and disappointed that Inge remains unchanged in her beliefs. Maybe some explanation of Quiller's character and attitudes could be cited via new sections on "Quiller's character" or "Production and contrast with other spy franchises", similar to sections in The Ipcress File (film). Something like that. Sorry to post at length, but the film is far better than the overall article suggests. Pete Hobbs (talk) 07:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs tighter Plot Summary and maybe section on Character
Talk:King Rat (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Changi has always been located on the island of Singapore.  It's misleading or confusing to say that during WW2 it was in "Malaya", because it had been administered as part of the Straits Settlements since 1867 and was more accurately a part of "British Malaya" (which was geographically fragmented across the Malay peninsula and included much more than Singapore). To make it easier to understand I have edited the article to reflect its location as Singapore. 2600:1700:EA01:1090:CDA2:EDAD:5DE8:8693 (talk) 16:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Changi
Talk:The Earth Dies Screaming

message: Several seconds from the end of the film, as the plane takes off, you see a black car moving in the distance.(83.39.37.40 (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Car

message: It was an odd title for the film as almost everyone in the world silently dropped dead from the almost instant effects of the unknown gas. But no doubt it sold the film to movie goers.(83.45.204.48 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Vinyl (1965 film)

message: Imdb says its runtime is 70 minutes which is hardly short.  If anyone has seen it, please adjust the page accordingly. Gillian416 21:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a short film?

message: Is there any link or archive of this film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.50.184.196 (talk) 03:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where Can this be downloaded of view?
Talk:European conger

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 18:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Crack in the World

message: I think the idea was that seawater poured into the crack and turned into super-heated steam at very high pressure, which was supposed to send the chunk (about 20,000 square miles surface area) hurtling skywards.(Cyberia3 (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The chunk

message: I've removed the following text from the lead:
: While noted for its attempts at scientific accuracy, its premise—a crack in the solid crust of the Earth threatening life on it—was disproved by the conclusive proof of plate tectonics, announced in 1965.
Well the thing is it's science fiction. There is no information here supporting the statement on attempts at scientific accuracy, which I've removed. We don't even see who the science advisor was, if there was such a person. Nor do we see who the writer or writers were. Was it a rare venture into fiction by a great scientist? We don't know from this material. So until we've got some good reason to say this is something worth saying (and not just some puffery intended to sell tickets) we don't say it. --TS 20:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Science fiction
Talk:List of waltzes by Chopin

message: I'm going to AfD or Move this page to something else. It's entirely redundant and enlightens nothing more than the primary article. Perhaps an article providing a brief explication of each one, like Preludes (Chopin), is best. ALTON .ıl 01:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment, the article is an exact duplicate of List of compositions by Frédéric Chopin#Waltz.  A simple redirect would be easy to do.  An overview article like the one for Etudes wouldn't be a bad idea either.  DavidRF 02:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Herbert Pagani

message: I just tagged this article as unclear due a number of sentences which are hard to understand and don't make sense. Here is one example, "In order to represent the congestion and collapse of the Energy Systems as described by this Italian futurologist, Pagani proceeded to clone on thousands of images of our civilization using the first two Rank Xerox colour duplicators installed in France and in Italy." It would be helpful if someone who has knowledge about the subject and a good grasp of English could edit these sentences so that they make sense. Maestroso simplo (talk) 01:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear Sections
Talk:York, Maine

message: I am not sure that I am comfortable with the way Native Americans are depicted in this post.  No kidding they "attacked" York many times.  We need to be careful about the way history is told here.  The European settlers took over Native American land.  Every instance of Native aggression cannot be considered a massacre.  We need to be honest about the fact that the settlers ruined the lives of the natives too...72.226.201.192 York born social studies educator
The article states that the town was "named for York, England, site of the defeat of Oliver Cromwell." Of course this is an error since Cromwell, though occasionally unsuccessful in achieving a military objective, was never defeated, in York or anywhere else. It was the parliamentary-royalist struggle to control York that led in 1644 to the Battle of Marston Moor,the biggest battle of the civil wars. It was a decisive victory for parliamentary/Scottish forces and Cromwell played a leading role in the victory. Though I use Wikipedia a lot, I am unfamiliar with the editing procedures. Perhaps someone who is will make the necessary change.67.197.194.12 (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

message: York has it's own zoo/amusement park  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.78.128.118 (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  zoo 
Talk:Bob Conners

message: Is it me or is the "other information" section POV??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.96.237 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 7 April 2007‎
:This comment is very stale and there is not a section called "Other information" at this time. Dwpaul Talk    15:16, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Latent variable model

message: I don't think that Latent variable model and Latent variable should be merged - they're different concepts, and neither is obviously a subcategory of the other. The articles currently contain quite different information, so this isn't a case where there is duplication of effort happening. I believe (thought it is not my field of mathematics) that the use of the term latent variable is much wider than its article implies, and includes situations quite unrelated to latent variable models.  Chrisjohnson 01:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The articles says "Therefore there may be a psychometrical latent variable, but not a psychological psychometric variable". Is there an example to make this clearer? 92.0.230.198 (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in psychology
Talk:Santa Cristina Gherdëina

message: There seems to be no end to that discussion--Moroderen (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be no discussion anymore: all recent documents by the commune of S.Cristina use the version with "i" lately. Official letter-head was switched in 2007 from "S.Crestina" to "S.Cristina".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajoch (talk • contribs) 09:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Crestina or Santa Cristina ?
Talk:Shaun Ellis (wolf researcher)

message: You may want to consider moving the page to Shuan Ellis (wolf); grammar's especially important in page titles. ~thesublime514 • talk 01:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just going to post here suggesting the same thing. Turlo Lomon 01:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got that done, and now to start working! Nescio sed Scio 21:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text:  Yeah I moved the page, you may have found it already... Nescio sed Scio 04:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move the Page?
Template talk:Armenians

message: I think we should reinstate the "Language" item in this template, and remove the "Alphabet."  (I think the Alphabet is part of the Language and Literature sections, and doesn't need an explicit section.) Serouj 02:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No notice was placed here that this image has been nominated for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Other images used on this page may also have been nominated -- please check them all by clicking on them to see if there is a deletion notification on the image page.  If there is, use the link that takes you to "this image's entry" to comment on the nomination for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image nominated for deletion

message: Several source images of :File:Armenian people.JPG have been deleted and the compilation has been tagged for deletion. It requires someone to remove the images from the compilation or it will be deleted soon. --Denniss (talk) 01:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image up for deletion
Talk:New Zealand Ministry of Education

message: What were the six separate agencies, the DoE was split into? Brian | (Talk) 01:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from MoE, there was NZQA and the Education Review Office. I don't know what the others were.-gadfium 06:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I believe the article title New Zealand Ministry of Education is not correct as it does not follow the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (government departments and ministers). I believe better, and naming convention compliant, article title would be Ministry of Education (New Zealand). -- Cameron Dewe 11:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Veesicle

message: Category talk:	2
Category:	5
Image talk:	1
Image:	6
Mainspace	715
Talk:	469
Template talk:	3
Template:	14
User talk:	124
User:	96
Wikipedia talk:	15
Wikipedia:	208
avg edits per page	1.54
earliest	12:43, 7 October 2005
number of unique pages	1079
total	1658
2005/10 	1 	
2005/11 	0 	
2005/12 	0 	
2006/1 	0 	
2006/2 	0 	
2006/3 	0 	
2006/4 	0 	
2006/5 	0 	
2006/6 	0 	
2006/7 	0 	
2006/8 	10 	
2006/9 	6 	
2006/10 	0 	
2006/11 	25 	
2006/12 	25 	
2007/1 	300 	
2007/2 	265 	
2007/3 	911 	
2007/4 	115 
—Anas talk? 01:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Tarnished Angels

message: This feature lists its cast in both the opening credits and in the end credits, with the same 16 names listed in the same order. In the opening credits, the first four top-tier stars (Rock Hudson, Robert Stack, Dorothy Malone, Jack Carson) along with their character names, are shown and billed before the title and the fifth-billed co-star (Robert Middleton) is shown and billed, alongside his character name, immediately after the title. The remaining 11 names are listed without depicting either the actors or their character names.
The end credits, under header "THE PLAYERS", list the 16-name cast in two sections of eight names — using the form "BURKE DEVLIN……..ROCK HUDSON" for all 16 entries. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 03:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening credits and closing credits
Talk:Tommy Torres

message: me gustaria hablar con usted sobre un grupo musical, cantan merengue y son reconocidas por su nombre antiguo
Beatriz Roque
407-459-2967  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.233.63 (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  contrato musical 

message: Is the stress of Tomas on the first syllable or the second one? I thought you didn't see it so I deleted the talk then...  LoveVanPersie (talk) 17:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably the first syllable. Mr KEBAB (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the pronunciation
Talk:Monodactylus argenteus

message: "Silver moony" is not the correct name for this article. The article should be moved to "Monodactylus argenteus". Looking at Wikiproject Fishes' criteria for article names:
Use the common name for any species that satisfies at least one of the following criteria:
    1(i) The species has a single common name that is widely used and never used for any other species. While the species in question may have additional common names, those names are rarely used. Example: Greenland halibut.
    1(ii) The species has a widely recognised common name that is so rarely applied to other species that confusion as to the subject of the article is unlikely to arise. Example: Guppy.
    1(iii) Within the area where the species is endemic and/or of commercial importance, only a single common name is used by the relevant legal, conservation, fisheries or local institutions, even though other common names may exist. Example: Atlantic salmon.
    1(iv) The species has a common name that is normally separated from similar common names by use of geographical, descriptive, or other modifications to those names. Once differentiated, these names satisfy criteria i, ii, or iii above. Examples: Shovelnose sturgeon, Little shovelnose sturgeon, False shovelnose sturgeon.
Use the Latin name for any species that fails to satisfy criteria 1(i) to 1(iv), including such situations as the following:
    2(i) The same common name is regularly applied to multiple species. Example: Green spotted puffer.
    2(ii) There is no single common name used for the species. Example: Black widow tetra (a.k.a. Black tetra, Petticoat tetra).
    2(iii) The species has different common names in different English-speaking countries. Example: Plec (UK), pleco (US).
    2(iv) The species simply has no widely used common name. Example: Dermogenys sumatrana.
Criteria 1(i) is not satisfied. This fish does not have a single common name. Most commonly among aquarists it is called a mono, or sometimes a silver mono (with M. sebae being called an African mono to distinguish it), but it is also called a malay fingerfish, a silver batfish, a diamondfish, a butterfish, and many other names depending on country. Therefore criteria 1(ii) is not satisfied as the common name "silver moony" is not widely recognized. Since M. argenteus is widely distributed across the Indo-Pacific and has different names in the different countries where it is native, and has no one "most common" name throughout its range, criteria 1(iii) is not satisfied. I'll grant that criteria 1(iv) may be satisfied, but since this fish is of worldwide importance in the aquarium industry and mono or silver mono, not silver moony is the most common name in the aquarium industry, common sense should disqualify criteria 1(iv). Criteria 2(ii) applies as there is no single common name for the species (mono, moonfish, moony, batfish, diamondfish, fingerfish, etc). Criteria 2(iii) applies as the species has different common names in different English speaking countries (see above). Mmyers1976 (talk) 15:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name
Talk:Communist Party of Italy

message: Dear Ghepeu, you wrote "most of the pages linking here refers to the Communist Party esisting during and after the WWII". So you redirect "communist Party of Italy" to "Italian Communist Party". Then if you are right, you have to edit the "errors" in the pages where someone wrote "communist Party of Italy" but thought(!) to "Italian Communist Party". If we are making something with a sense, and Wikipedia is something with a sense, if some page has a link with the name "Communist Party of Italy" then it has to be linked to "Communist Party of Italy" and not to "Bugs Bunny".--Tompint 01:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 

message: The last couple paragraphs are hard to copy-edit because it is impossible to divine the meaning of the writer.
Specifically:
The program
A new concept of party
The Coming of “Bolshevization”
StNicksRocks (talk) 04:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard to decipher intent of the author 

message: This article seems to be talking about the same party as Italian Communist Party under different names. I suggest a merger. Ltwin (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Italian Communist Party? 

message: The English here does not really make sense. But it's not possible to correct it, as the author's intent is not clear, as a previous commenter pointed out. I think --- think --- that the author wants to justify, by anticipating, the PCI's turn to 'Eurocommunism' many decades later. But that's not entirely obvious. It really needs a re-write.Doug1943 15:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs to be rewritten by someone who understands the political issues involved, and whose native language is English
Talk:Oregon Historical Society Museum

message: One section mentions a 10,000 year old sandal, another mentions a 9,000 year old sandal. Are these possibly the same? -Pete (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Party popper

message: Can someone get a better pic.. best i could take
sorry
" An explosive engineer that loved to party" I laughed my ass off  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.22.136 (talk) 11:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does this article actually need an emoji section? It doesn't seem relevant.
DreamingAzzy (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emoji section