lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Violet (Peanuts)

message: *Should this article be moved to Violet Gray? Her surname is only given once, but it is considered canonical.Rockhopper10r 17:08, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: Were any of the Peanuts kids (other than Charlie Brown, Sally, Lucy, Linus & Rerun) ever given canonical last names?  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Peppermint Patty's surname is given as Reichardt at least once. Also, 5's last name is 95472, though he is a minor character. A few one-off characters like Tapioca Pudding, Joe Agate and Crybaby Boobie have surnames, but they're mostly part of the joke. Rockhopper10r (talk) 16:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gray?

message: From Appearance, "'violet' is French for 'purple'" -- actually the French for "purple" is pourpre.
'Violet' in French referes to a shade of purple, but 'violet' in English refers to the same thing.  There is nothing to suggest that the name of this character came from French.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 00:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purple
Talk:Dara Barrois/Dixon

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Dara Barrois/Dixon. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dara Wier →  – name change, see sources in article. Dustayo (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 October 2022
Talk:Symphony X (album)

message: To say that "Rod Tyler" is a poor singer is a complete subjective and uneutral statement (although I agree) --Pinnecco 17:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Banking regulation and supervision

message: A lot of the comments here are accurate and this page is in need of serious revision to remove off-topic items, poorly sourced or unsourced items, a US-centric view and a focus on the recent banking crisis.  I will try and draft a revision in the next couple of weeks but it would be good to hear what others watching this page think.Editengine (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: In need of extensive revision

message: The accuracy of this article comes into question, as banking is classified as a "self-regulated" industry in the United States.
This aspect of banking needs to be discussed in Wikipedia to maintain an objective viewpoint.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.162.28 (talk) 22:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-Regulated Industry

message: There could be a requirement that the there must be no asset-liability maturity mismatch as this would prevent bank runs, or at least a disclosure requirement for the banks to display the extent of the mismatch so the market will be able to do correct valuation of the risks of the bank. In the table How the example bank manages its liquidity positions are sorted into maturity buckets which gives approximately this information (the bucket "Beyond 5 years" is not very exact), but as a complement and more precise and compact measurement would be the duration gap. By requiring the duration gap to be zero the bank would be immunized. Najro (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Asset-liability maturity match requirement?

message: There are several ISO links - it woudl be good to put a short description as a list of numbers is meaningless and it takes time to go to the page, and then see what they actually mean.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.246.66.223 (talk) 08:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO numbers what do they mean? ?

message: Some serious bias in this article. For example, claiming Basel II has forced European banking systems to be run by a private banking cartel. I assume they are talking about VAR models or the capital requirements. Even if this is true (it isn't), it is a contraversial enough claim that it shouldn't be on what is supposedly a factual article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.208.255 (talk) 12:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are some serious problems with this article 

message: Dr. Wall has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Wall has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : David G. Mayes & Maria J. Nieto & Larry Wall, 2008. "Multiple safety net regulators and agency problems in the EU: Is Prompt Corrective Action partly the solution?," Banco de Espaa Working Papers 0819, Banco de Espaa.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Wall's comment on this article
Talk:Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005

message: Don't delete this article, but: the subject is the Romanian selection for the ESC 2005, not the ESC 2005 itself!!
Mijzelf
:This article is about everything that has to do with Romania's participation in 2005, from its background in the contest, to the song selection, to it's performance at the contest. Grk1011 (talk) 15:20, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Btw, this is the first time I'm expanding such a page. Do you think the expansion is well-done? Is there anything regarding the style I need to change?? Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is along the lines that I'd expect. Great job! Grk1011 (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:ECW on TNN

message: (My Generation theme song) 
Wasn't "My Generation" by Limp Bizkit the TNN theme song. Because on the Armpit.net they have it listed as the theme. Someone respond ASAP on this page or my talk page.TG 50 16:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is very pro-Heyman and very anti-TNN. Otto4711 (talk) 19:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-sided
Talk:Nkp (trigraph)

message: Is there any obvious reason why this article is at Nkp (letter) instead of simply Nkp? The same applies to Ngb (letter). --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\talk 17:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Coz its not a word.218.102.71.125 05:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ngb (trigraph)

message: Is there any obvious reason why this article is at Ngb (letter) instead of simply Ngb? The same applies to Nkp (letter). --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\talk 17:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Coz its not a word. 218.102.71.125 05:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What makes it a letter as opposed to just a consonant cluster?  Is there some single symbol used to represent Ngb that's just not covered by Unicode? PubliusFL 08:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: /ⁿɡ͡b/ is not a consonant cluster. --moyogo 18:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A phoneme, then?  Whatever you call it, it wouldn't seem to be a letter of the Latin alphabet unless there's a single character used to represent it in the Latin alphabet.  Is there? PubliusFL 19:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I changed the "letter" to "trigraph". Is that what you were talking about? --moyogo 20:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steven Lamy

message: Drat, I swore he was born in Canada (him having mentioned so during my time as a student in SIR), but I can't find hide nor hair of proof online.  Why is there no mention of his undergraduate work anywhere online? --Bobak 17:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hah... "Enigma" is definitely an accurate way of putting it (in the best way possible, of course).  I know he used to talk about watching the broadcasts of USC SIR's own (old) Research Institute on Communist Strategy and Propaganda on mornings after cartoons.  Anyway, I've updated his bio to note he is now a past Director of SIR.  As I recall, the Directorship is for a set period of years, I know Lamy became director after I graduated so it's been about 5-6 years.  --Bobak 15:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well apparently the mystery is starting to unravel; A websearch for images of "Steven Lamy" revealed this  picture; it is posted on Siena College's website and states he graduated in 1973.  I'll fit this when I have time, if someone doesnt beat me to it. Trojan traveler 01:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice detective work there!  I admit my only familiarity with Siena is the NCAA B-Ball tournament's play-in game, but now I know they can churn out smarts. --Bobak 14:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Devil Hunter Yohko

message: Having just watched Devil Hunter Yohko and the director's commentary from the DVD, I went ahead and changed three statements I found in this article that contradicted or were contrary to uncited information in this article.
In the original article, the introductory paragraph stated: "ADV co-founder, Matt Greenfield, said the reason Yohko was chosen as the first release was because he and those involved thought it would be a "solid seller" because of how racy the show was." In the DVD commentary Greenfield states that he "couldn't exactly say that wasn't one of the reasons," for licensing the show, and goes on to make a case that it was more about establishing general credibility with older viewers. If someone has a citation for the quote I think it would be worth keeping here, but without any citation it seems a little sensationalistic and not in-line with his comments on the DVD.
The original introductory paragraph also stated, "The fact Toho had an American licensing branch was another major reason that Yohko was the first anime to be released by ADV." This seems to contradict what Greenfield said on the DVD, which is that the show's production origins were relatively easy to trace, but that "They never really anticipated there would be any kind of market for this sort of thing outside of Japan" and that "Eventually we managed to convince them that A) They did own the rights to it and B) That we really were serious about it." His statements on this topic are rambling and not 100% concise, but it doesn't sound indicative of working with an established "American licensing branch"?
Lastly, I replaced a statement made at the end of the summary of Episode 1 that, "This episode was clearly made for mature audiences (due to the pop scene and the frequent fan service). Subsequent volumes were toned down and aimed at a broader audience." Again the statement is uncited and in this case, "clearly" is a common weasel word. On the DVD Greenfield states that the original edits to Japanese episode 1 were made because the director wanted it to be "darker" (not necessarily "for mature audiences") and that in the end episodes 1 & 5 stand out as the dark episodes while episodes 2, 3, 4 (music video compliation) and 6 are much more light-hearted in nature.
Those are my observations. I'm curious to see what information previously and currently in the article are citable and if any of it is garbage. I'd like to see the article get tightened up and include some of these neat tidbits. --75.162.51.180 (talk) 01:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like sound editing to me.  Although the interview on the DVD is a primary source, it's better than no source for some of the statements you've removed/changed.  Good job!  ~PescoSo say•we all 03:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial Licensing And North American Release
Talk:Lemniscate of Bernoulli

message: #How can I use the Lemniscate equation (x^2 + y^2)^2 = a^2 (x^2 - y^2) to come up with a graph?
#Is there a mathematical connection to the similar looking Lissajous figures? --Abdull 18:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article gives the rectangular formula as (x^2 + y^2)^2 = 2a^2 (x^2 - y^2). Meanwhile, Schaum's (ISBN 0070382034) says (x^2 + y^2)^2 = a^2 (x^2 - y^2) -- note the factor of 2 is missing from the right-hand member. Either formula generates a lemniscate. Also, MathWorld says (x^2 + y^2)^2 = 2c^2 (x^2 - y^2) Later, MW gives two polar formulas:  r^2 = 2c^2\cos(2\theta) and r^2 = a^2\cos(2\theta), noting that 2c^2 = a^2. We can make this Wikipedia article more consistent with other mathematical literature by changing (x^2 + y^2)^2 = 2a^2 (x^2 - y^2) to (x^2 + y^2)^2 = a^2 (x^2 - y^2), and noting that some authorities write (x^2 + y^2)^2 = 2c^2 (x^2 - y^2). Xovimat 16:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equation, relation to Lissajous figures 

message: It's unclear what is meant by 'unbounded' in the formulas for the first and second derivates of y (respectively x) when thought of as a function of x (respectively y).  Could someone please clarify what that is supposed to mean?Jrdodge (talk) 20:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivative formulas 

message: I did the algebra and, assuming that "bipolar coordinates" refers to two-center bipolar coordinates, I'm pretty sure the formula there is wrong; it should be rr' = a², not rr' = a²/2 .  This would be consistent with the definition of the lemniscate as given in the opening paragraph. I'm changing the formula; if I'm wrong, I'll be happy to learn why. --Jay (Histrion) (talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other formulas: mistake? 

message: User:Xovimat added some derivatives and curvature formulas on 8 Sept. and 6 Oct. 2007, including the edit summary "Xovimat added the derivatives section, from his own calculations".  This is self-admitted OR, and as far as I can see at least the first derivatives are wrong. (Both seem to be missing a minus sign, and one has extraneous 2's, etc.)
So I'm removing his calculations. 208.50.124.65 (talk) 20:10, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: These derivatives aren’t the most important feature to include in this article which is missing many relevant features of the Lemniscate, a discussion of its history, etc., and it seems okay to leave them out on the basis that they don’t fit in the current article’s narrative flow, or on the basis that they are incorrect. But mathematical calculations are not at all the same kind of “original research” as original work in other fields (they are either correct or they aren‘t, and anyone can easily verify them), and I don’t think it’s appropriate to remove them on that basis alone (not to mention the curvature of such a common curve is undoubtedly published in various other sources). –jacobolus (t) 19:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing OR
Talk:Code amber alert

message: I found this article by looking for more informations about something I found on the web, http://codeamber.org (about child abduction) and to find out if there is something similar in countries other than the USA, too. However, this article only talks about ONE meaning of Code Amber. Could someone who knows about these things please add some informations about the other meanings? Thanks in advance! -- Madeleine 18:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. This is now a disambiguation page. The London Underground alert article has been moved to Code amber alert (London Underground). Kevyn 08:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of disambiguation page
Talk:DJ mix

message: Due to the digital nature of the recording process, crowd noise does not need to be edited out.  Neither of which is true about turntables.  Cartriges pick up crowd noise quite well if the said crowd is shouting on the top if its lungs near the booth. Removing the phrase. Rootless 13:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Have altered this section. Confusion here between presentation of information relating to what a DJ mix is, and presenting what are essentially examples of commercial mix albums. Irrespective of this distinction, there is nothing here to validate notability. If it can be shown, in accordance with WP:VER that someones mix has been documented as notable then it would appear to have relevance.Semitransgenic (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable examples
Talk:The Door (novel)

message: I suspect the current version's "plot summary" is lifted verbatim from a book blurb – which is against wiki rules? Does it (in that case) need to be given with a "the following is the text provided by ..." note? Slavatrudu (talk) 08:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a novel by Mary Roberts Rinehart with the identical title, The Door. It does not have a page (& is probably not notable enough for one, although it is credited with the cliché "The butler did it"); it's listed in the author's article. Suggest a hatnote here but I'm not sure of format. Will leave the suggestion for others, or a rainy day.... --D Anthony Patriarche, BSc (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rinehart novel
Talk:Adam and Eve and Pinch Me (Rendell novel)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  02:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:A Sight for Sore Eyes (novel)

message: Looks like this was adapted to film in 2004.  Lisatwo (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: film adaptation
Talk:The Crocodile Bird

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  02:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:The Bridesmaid

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  02:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:The Veiled One

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  02:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:An Unkindness of Ravens

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  13:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:The Killing Doll

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  03:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:A Demon in My View

message: I feel obliged to mention that the last line of Poe's poem "Alone" is [Or] "a demon in my view"; is this coincidence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.154.183.50 (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edgar Allan Poe and Ruth Rendell