Talk:The Sight (Hunter novel)

message: I just noticed, why's the cover for The Sight have the kits with all amber eyes? On the copy I've got they're what their eye colors really are. I wonder why they've changed it...? (Nyctra 15:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are two different covers. One has the correct eye colors while one has a different one.Nightflower 22:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

text: If this is the first edition cover then you have to leave it as is. If you want to have the other cover you could add in a sentence or two about it, but it's really unecisary to have both the covers or to change them.  Bella Swan(Talk!) 17:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holly, Lion, Jaypaws eyes 

message: :Image:PowerofThreebook1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it. ~ Bella Swan 22:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PowerofThreebook1.jpg

message: ...And another question: why are there two story summaries in the article?? Extremely perplexing....  ♣ Bishop Tutu  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 00:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted. Shrewpelt (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary seems to be POV-ed 

message: The article is too long, and the plot summary looks like it's been taken directly from the inside cover of the book. 
I'll cut down when I get home...IceUnshattered (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WAY TOO LONG. 

message: Does anyone notice that Firestar was a bit lazy when deciding wether to make Graystripe deputy again or let Brambleclaw remain deputy? I mean, come on, Firestar said that he "owes Graystripe so much" and that he trusts him more than anyone, but the last thing the clan needs is more change so Brambleclaw remains deputy. He may as well have said "I think Graystripe is the rightful deputy, but i'm too lazy to go through the ritual again so Brambleclaw will remain the deputy". Does anyone else agree that they could have come up with a better reason to keep Brambleclaw as deputy?
--The Lord of the Allosaurs (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Brambleclaw knows the territory better than Graystripe. And a lot of warriors, like Dustpelt, Mousefur, Spiderleg, etc, are already questioning Firestar, with his constantly taking in outsiders, etc. Brambleclawx 20:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deputy 

message: So on Warriors: Power of Three#The Sight, I noticed that the plot summary for The Sight is almost a word-for-word copy of the plot summary here. Should the summary in Warriors: Power of Three be shortened? Let me know your thoughts. – Ben79487 (talk contribs) 01:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary copy