lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Polhode

message: Lots of the article text is identical to the introduction here: http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_polhode_story.html
I don't know which came first, but we should probably either cite it or remove it.
74.139.79.62 07:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, changing it by eliminating "of symmetry". Kbk (talk)
It depends on what variable one means. The Center of Mass is a point determined by symmetries about three orthogonal axes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.130.60 (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:White Magic (band)

message: ==Untitled==
Just folk? I think psychedelia is def. an influence here and should be noted. Bleedingcherub 07:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Just folk? I think psychedelia is def. an influence here and should be noted. Bleedingcherub 07:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article definiteley needs work. Wwwhatsup (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work
Talk:I Wanna Be a NY Ranger

message: Not sure quite where to mention it, but shouldn't the full length 1:38/We Are 138 reference be mentioned somewhere?JanderVK (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Song Length
Talk:Flying to My Home

message: I added some info from the Madinger/Easter book, including more on what Hamish Stuart did on the track and the presence of Chris Whitten. Madinger and Easter don't mention Kreiger and Slitzky at all. It would be really nice to have a source on them. Brettalan (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Krieger and Slitzky?
Talk:The Bard of Armagh

message: This is my first 'talk' about a subject, please excuse me if I'm not doing this right.
I recently found three letters sent ot my late father concerning the historical source of the his song that I feel may offer some clarity from a reputable source. My father wrote to Donal O'Sullivan (Director of Studies in Irish Folk Music at University College, Dublin) around 1962 asking for clarification on the song's history. He received a very detailed response where O'Sullivan cites page/verse numerous books/references that detail the song's early history. I'll have a scan of this letter available in a few weeks. 
I didn't want to just add this letter to the page before annoucning it here as it may contain conflciting information than is in this article. Should I just make a copy available for contributors to digest first and the. you guys amend the article if it needs it. Ponyegg (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song's history (by Donal O'Sullivan)
Talk:366th Division

message: The units listed are not part of the 366th DIV. but of the 143rd DIV.
Also, the division belongs to the northern command as stated at the top of the page
and not the southern command as stated in the categories. This is for clarification for
the changes I will make. Jakednb (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:Euroregion

message: Shouldn't it say (and link to), in the intro, the "European Union", rather than "Europe" ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Europe" 

message: What's going on with the British/French regions now? 67.231.66.125 (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Brexit
Talk:Mongolia–North Korea relations

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Mike Mangini

message: I'm not too sure if it's Terry or Dale Bozzio who was the one who worked with Mike for this one. Any headsup? - User:sehsuan 22 Aug 2007
I think we need a new photo. The current one is seven years old and the guy is still alive and perhaps more famous than ever so a newer picture would serve its purpose better. Oh Frustration (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, If you want to discuss an article it's better to the here on the talk page. Cheers,  Mlpearc (open channel) 18:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced changes
Talk:International A-class catamaran

message: Should the pronoun "this" be changed to a noun either because the antecedent is unclear or too far removed from the pronoun?  (AltheaCase (talk) 02:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should pronoun "this" be changed to a noun? 

message: The C-Class article says "during the 1960s" while this article says "during the 1950s".  
One of them is incorrect. 
Can we narrow it down to a specific year? ZeroXero (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What year did the IYRU define the classes?
Talk:Acid Tests

message: Acid Test poster with Allen Ginsberg" in the present article is a known fake
According to the section "Posters & Ads" on the Ken Kesey & the Merry Pranksters website <http://www.lysergia.com/MerryPranksters/MerryPranksters_main.htm>, the poster with caption "Acid Test poster with Allen Ginsberg", reproduced in this article (Acid Tests) is a fake.
The above referred to page (KEN KESEY & THE MERRY PRANKSTERS) states the following regarding the poster: "This poster with Allen Ginsberg, supposedly promoting day 2 (the Acid Test) of the Trips Festival, is fake and recently manufactured."
Perhaps the poster could be replaced with a reproduction of an original. In any case, the present poster ought to be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadan (talk • contribs) 13:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Acid Test poster with Allen Ginsberg" reproduced in the present article is a known fake 

message: I was just reading in the book "Rolling Stone Interviews", on Page 189 Jerry Garcia and his wife both insist that the 2nd Acid Test was at the Big Beat Club in Palo Alto. This is different from the timeline given in this article (and other places as well). I think that Jerry Garcia of all people would know the correct order. More research is needed. Jfkinyon (talk) 04:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acid Tests Timeline 
Talk:Functional reactive programming

message: This doesn't sound right at all. From what I can gather, the guy behind FRP intended it primarily as a way of modelling things continuously. So a sine wave could be an input and some reactive thingamajig would react to that input to yield a noisy phased wave for example, and some other reactive thingamajig would power the UI. As I understood the whole point was using some nifty math to allow a continuous reactive pipeline. This idea that it somehow evolved on two axes, continuous and discrete, looks to me like someone is trying to conflate FRP with Reactive Programming, which is where the whole debate lies at the moment. Of course I could be completely wrong.
178.255.168.77 (talk) 14:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erm?

message: This article heavily overlaps reactive programming. 75.57.243.88 (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge? 

message: Wan, Zhanyong; Taha, Walid; Hudak, Paul (Feb 2011), "Real-Time FRP", ICFP (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-28, retrieved 2013-09-23.
I'm new, so maybe someone consider to check and remove it. It's not like original site will resurrect soon. 37.252.88.53 (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 8 to "original (PDF)" leads to porno site
Talk:Cleves, Ohio

message: I rewrote the end of the introduction to take out the loaded language, as " the council decided to put its citizens lives at risk" is a very opinionated statement to make, especially considering the size of the village and its proximity of other police and fire outposts. Mtndrums (talk) 14:29, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Linux Security Modules

message: The repeated reverting of a single line between me and Tango is annoying.
Yes, an external citation for this factoid would be very nice. I have looked hard for such a citation, but can't find one. Probably because at the time Linus shipped Linux 2.6.0, he did not consider LSM to be worth noting.
None the less, it is manifestly true that LSM shipped with Linux 2.6.0 because it was there in 2.6.0, and was not there before in 2.4.
To take this line out, you have to conjecture that some other reeally strange thing happened, such that LSM was sneakily inserted into the Linux kernel at some other time, because it is definitely there now.
Crispincowan 07:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The repeated reverting

message: "LSM avoids the approach of system call interposition as used in Systrace because it does not scale to multiprocessor kernels and is subject to TOCTTOU (race) attacks."
I think the term "to scale" is used incorrectly here. Multiprocessor systems require special treatment to prevent attacks using race-conditions but this has very little to do with scalability. Also I don't see a big difference between system-call interposition and the upcalls used by LSM. It's not the same but I really don't see how this is a different concept solving problems of the other. Likewise, the time-of-check-time-of-use issues in Systrace or similar solutions strike me rather as implementation problems than design flaws. I doubt that LSM is by design immune against TOCTTOU bugs. Also it seems that the author of systrace has already fixed the concurrency issues, if I understand correctly:
http://systrace.org/index.php?/archives/14-Evading-System-Sandbox-Containment.html --217.87.127.4 (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable sentence 
Talk:Trendle Ring

message: This is a well known site and could do with a better entry. I see from the article history there have been some false starts in improving it.
IMHO what is needed is a brief discussion of the possible different origins and interpretations (Hill fort? cattle enclosure? settlement?) with ref to most recent surveys, along with an emphasis on the location and visibility of the monument. A good photo would help.
Timbow001 (talk) 11:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Naval Network Warfare Command

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Navy Information Operations Command and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#Navy Information Operations Command until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Navy Information Operations Command" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Marcella of Rome

message: I believe that this article looks more like a start than a stub class article. Does anyone know how I would go about requesting a review? Thanks! Alexandrathom (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Start class?

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.com/books?id=Z4ymP1rqsbkC&pg=PA83. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Handley Page HP.115

message: -----------------------------
This is a really clumsy sentence if it means what I think it does:
 it was estimated that a powered version would achieve 200% more flying time at 95% less cost per hour. 
change to:
 it was estimated that a powered version would achieve 200% more flying time at 95% of the cost per hour. 
--I get the "twice as much flying time" precision, but the "one-twentieth cost per hour" sounds unreasonably optimistic.
--How about just replacing "less" with "of the"
--I'd do it myself but it's possible some report in the mid 1950's actually had the rosier estimate, and I don't have anything to the contrary to use as a citation.
-----------------------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReedScarce (talk • contribs) 19:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please post them on this page, it's always useful to have original photographs complement an article. FWIW Bzuk 12:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

message: All of the images in the article show the aircraft from the side, and due to optical effects, make the wing look quite wide. In contrast, the HP.115 was very narrow, and these photographs are not doing that justice. Here's an example of the sort of shot we need! Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  REALLY need an overhead shot!
Talk:Jūmonji Tomokazu

message: I see this page has been moved from Jumonji Matsutaro to Jumonji Masayasu. But according to Sumo Reference, his shikona has never been either of those. It was Jumonji Tomokazu (ie his exact birth name), and now its Jumonji Akinori! I'm very confused. Pawnkingthree 08:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question, it appears that this name change has only happened just now with the release of the new banzuke and Sumo Reference just hasn't updated yet. Jumonji seems to be a rikishi who is fond of changing his shikona (or part of it anyway). Pawnkingthree 20:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Lindalino

message: The current version of the etymology of Lindalino at the top of the article is just as much rubbish as the previous version - "dubh linn" is not a Viking name, but Celtic for "black pool" (see Dublin#History), and Lindalino is not an anagram of either "dubh linn" or "black pool".  It is in fact a pun on Dublin: "double lin" with extra letters thrown in for euphony's sake (see Gulliver's Travels#"Lindalino") DES 08:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name
Talk:PS

message: What about the english language? I mean I've always know this abbreviation to say something personal, and I'm not exactly sure of the words that this abbreviates. But I think it migh stand for Personal Sidenote. TeePee-20.7 08:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In a letter, PS stands for post scriptum, from which we get postscript. As you suggest, it's used for adding an afterthought, sometimes of a more personal nature.  It originated in letter writing, where one wouldn't be able to physically alter what had gone before to accommodate new ideas, changes of opinion or new events. --Tony Sidaway 15:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:    We have articles on the late 1950s songs P.S. I Love You, and (a little off-topic) Sealed with a Kiss.--Jerzy•t 09:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Language 

message: why isnt this on the page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.236.218.68 (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to me this has been appropriately responded to by now.--Jerzy•t 09:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Script - PS 

message: I've removed quite a lot of stuff that just happened to contain, or start with, the letters "P" and "S".  That isn't what this page is for.  I've retained all entries for which I can obtain independent verification that "PS" (upper or lower case) is a widely used abbreviation, or one used in the professional field with which it is associated.  I've removed the rest.  --Tony Sidaway 15:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]]
Talk:1908 in aviation

message: I have located the following relevant to this year:
1. Henri Farman flew a woman passenger, [Mlle P. Van Pottelsberghe] in Ghent Belgium, in late May 1908, as reported in Le Patriote Illustre, 7 June 1908. 
2. During Leon Delagrange's tour of Italy in 1908 Mme. Therese Peltier made a solo flight at the Military Square in Turin, Italy, during which she flew 200 meters at a height of about 2 1/2 meters.
Both the above from http://www.earlyaviators.com/epeltier.htm
and;
3. The flight regarded as the first offically with a woman passenger may not have been fully controlled. In which case the first fully controlled flight with a woman passenger would be WIlbur Wright with Mrs. Harriet O. Berg in October 1908.  
From: http://www.earlyaviators.com/edelagra.htm
Are there any objections to these being added? DerbyCountyinNZ 08:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the ad:1 to the dutch wikipedia, and will add the others too after reading the links. I think it had something to do with French chauvinism during that time, that they wanted the first women to be French over French territory. So be my guest Brbbl 06:34, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Masca

message: 22-AUG-2007: With reference to the article on the village of Masca in Tenerife, having just returned from the island and been on Tenerife during the recent wildfires, I can assure anyone who is concerned, that Masca has NOT been "laid to ashes" as stated in the article. I visited the area after the fires had been extinguished and around half a dozen houses have been damaged and a substantial amount of damage to the surrounding forest/valley is evident, but to suggest the village has been completely destroyed is very far from true.
24-SEP-07: OK, I'll try this again. The original author of this page has stated that Masca was "laid to ashes" in the recent fires on Tenerife. I, having been there at the time and having seen the village after the fire had finished, dared to suggest that this was not strictly true. The author has seen fit to remove my direction to this page and subsequent rebuttal of their statement. I can't be bothered to argue the point, so I have not re-instated my directive, but instead will direct ayone who is interested enough to come to this discussion, to the following article 
http://www.secret-tenerife.com/2007/08/tenerife-fire-news-from-masca.shtml 
which clearly agrees with me, that the destruction of 6 houses - although devastating to the owners and clearly 6 houses too many in such a small village - hardly constitutes the village being "laid to ashes". I do wish people would get their facts right.........  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.236.250.250 (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Harold Augenbraum

message: I am Judge Florentino V. Floro here in the Philippines. I just found this in the breaking news of our GMA-7 internet site, and the translation and publication due to this author is a great contribution to our Filipino culture, politics and history. Rizal had not been in australia but his book translated by this great author Augenbraum plus the bust and statues there, we are proud of this.
--Florentino floro 08:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc. countries 

message: This says he's a writer, but says very little about what he wrote. Maurreen (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What did he write?
Talk:California Film Institute

message: I'm new to anything other than being a read-only Wikipedian, but I noticed that this article needs an edit. In the opening summary section, self-referential language (ie. "our organization") rather than 3rd-person. The implication is that the article was written by the subject themselves, calling into question the objectivity of the article. Not that it's a particularly controversial subject or anything, just language choice could be better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.104.67.90 (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.facebook.com/cfieducation/about/ https://www.doclands.com/about/ https://www.facebook.com/pg/SmithRafaelFilmCenter1/about/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Signor–Lipps effect

message: I've removed the "stub" tag. There isn't much more to say about the S-L effect per se, and the article contains the prime citation.Philcha 09:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub tag

message: It's nice that we have a diagram, but it would be better if it were to contain some actual species. Of course, that poses the problem that we don't know when the actual extinction date was for many, but maybe the dinosaur example from the article could be used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 18:52, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram
Talk:Tiburon Peninsula

message: Was there a legitimate reason for putting Haiti's largest peninsula under a California Wikiproject?Historian (talk) 19:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: California?

message: Anyone has a good image? Historian (talk) 19:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?

message: The California peninsula (which had the main article), is about a small landmass that holds less than 20,000 people. The Haiti peninsula has at least 2,218,403 people, and is regularly affected by tropical cyclones. I boldly moved the article, since I believe the Haitian peninsula should get the main article. Hope that's not an issue. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent move