lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charlotte Knobloch

message: Why is she called a Holocaust survivor? She was never imprisoned in a Nazi concentration camp or anywhere near the death camps in the east. Ontologix (talk) 23:13, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holocaust Survivor? 

message: *her parents divorced in 1936. She was subsequently raised by her grandmother Albertine
*she recalled how, as a frightened six-year-old, she had clutched her father’s hand and run past burning Jewish shops in Munich on 9 November 1938. 
This is confusing. Why would she be with her dad in 38 if she was raised by grandma from 36 onward?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.231.168.131 (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  36 to 38
Talk:Charlotte Lewis

message: According to the Yahoo news source, that incident happened four years after the US one, "which would put the alleged assault date at 1982". But Yahoo News also put that other rape into 1977, and four year later is 1981! Lewis allegedly was born in 1967, so did this happen in 1981 at age 14, 1982 at age 15, 1983 at age 16, or are all these combinations wrong? And then, three or four years after that rape, she filmed "Pirates" with Polanski? So far, the story doesn't make much sense. Looks like the Media still has to get the dates, and the context, right.89.183.82.219 (talk) 22:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some statements don't compute 

message: He "abused" her? And she made movie with him 4 years later?
How about Playboy centrefold. I mean she really "suffered" her whole life.
71.99.87.208 (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So much for the abuse. 

message: "She said that the had paid sexual services since the age of 14, and that she wanted to be the mistress of Roman Polanski at the time." (17:27, 14 July 2010) Maybe "the" should have been "she", but I still do not understand the sentence enough to fix it (and I do not understand the French sources). 92.224.14.49 (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: Charlotte Lewis gave a long interview in Le Nouvel Observateur, stating that most of the "informations" in News of the World were wrong. I plan to complete these part like it was done on the French page. Danilodambre (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A long interview in a French journal 

message: The lemma says that Lewis 'accused' Polanski in May 2010, which is over 10 years ago. I think the lemma should mention the outcome of that 'accusation'. I hope to find it somewhere, but chances are that it died down out of the media's lights. Besides, I will change the title of a section to 'Accusation' (singular) since only one accusation is mentioned.Mcouzijn (talk) 09:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outcome?
Talk:British Rail 15107

message: British Railways rebranded itself as British Rail in the mid-1960s.
This loco was scrapped well before then. So it wasn't a British Rail loco.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.101.19 (talk) 13:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it is somewhat arbitrary to determine the names of articles based on whether or not BR had yet rebranded itself at the time that the last loco was withdrawn. So it's easiest to use "British Rail" consistently. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can it be "British Rail"?
Talk:Bungee cord

message: Does anyone have an etymology?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.117.164.28 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Origin of "bungee", "bungie" and "bungy" are uncertain.  I think there was a company that at one time actually used the name "bungee" to market the shock cord material, but a recent check on the 'net didn't turn anything up.  Best reference so far is an entry in the 1938 Oxford English Dictionary, but no indication of where or when the term appeared, or who coined it.—QuicksilverT @ 21:34, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A 1937 Flight article on the Armstrong Whitworth Whitley using the phrase "bunjee", here:  ... and a 1919 one using the spelling "bungy" and "bungies" here: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.55.68 (talk) 09:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology?

message: I have put a picture of a collection of bungee cords on the main page.  remove it if not what is wanted, otherwise  remove from the Requested Pictures page.  --jmb 17:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Elasticated rope/cord was used on Sopwith Camels and some other WW I aircraft to secure the axle to the undercarriage legs, the bungee cord providing a measure of springing/suspension. At the same time, it was used to provide a counteracting compensation to the weight of the gun in the Scarff ring aircraft gun mounting. If I remember correctly, the word 'bungee' (or 'bunjee') is of Indian origin, via the Raj, although I could be wrong. Ian Dunster (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a tantalising mention of a bungee assisted escape from an aircraft in 1910 on the ejector seat page. However, there are no references provided at present, and I am a little sceptical. I really want it to be true. It sounds like very good fun. Nick1961 (talk) 11:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First use?

message: How does Shock cord relate to Parachute cord? Anyone know?... Benryanau (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the elastic bungee cord was intended to reduce the shock to the wearer of the parachute opening, i.e., to absorb and reduce the sudden jerk.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.55.68 (talk) 09:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous?

message: Has anyone considered if it is worth mentioned the notable dangers of these devices? In NZ it is known as a danger to the eyes, especially when being used to fasten items to car roof racks. There have even been posters up in hospitals warning of the dangers. The hooks at the end can cause terrible injuries to eyes and other body parts. 46.233.112.165 (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree about the dangers of elastic-powered hooks. Bungee cords with carabiner clips are far more satisfactory and should be mandatory.46.233.112.165 (talk) 19:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangers
Talk:British Rail Class 01

message: This is clearly incorrect on the grounds that the unicycling lion was introduced in 1949, and the first 01s were not built until 1956.  I have accordingly removed this claim.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slaffter (talk • contribs) 22:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, but you also removed the statement that they were the last to carry that emblem, which is quite true. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim 'first to carry unicycling lion emblem' 

message: There is Oxford Publishing Company(OPC)postcard no. 98 which shows 01 002 in BR Green at Holyhead Quarry on 23/7/74. So the locomotive must have been repainted into black livery between 1974 and 1981 as a historic reversion; it did not retain original black livery for whole life. --Jayceemodels (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have that postcard somewhere. I seem to recall it being a black loco on that card though; I must dig it out. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it (evidence: last line of caption is "Quarry on 23.7.74. Photo: A. M. Clarke"). Loco is definitely black: are you sure that your card hasn't faded? --Redrose64 (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim " still carrying their original livery of British Railways black " 
Talk:British Rail Class 02

message: This article seems to have a lot Flickr references, which are generally unacceptable as per WP:USERGENERATED. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You could remove the whole section, as was done at British Rail Class 01. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flickr as a reference 

message: The table at British Rail Class 02#Operation is unsourced, and lacks context - in particular, what date this information applies to. Compare the table at British Rail Class 20#British Rail, which is clearly stated as being for March 1974, and is moreover sourced. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This page is poorly written in general, and the tables / lists are very repetitive. I've started trying to sort out the grammar / wording etc, but it needs a lot of work. For example, locomotives of this type aren't normally referred to as "units". To be honest, in comparison with other similar pages, it feels as though it needs a complete restructure, but I don't think I'm brave enough, or experienced enough as a WikiD editor, to attempt this. Mwsmith20 (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation
Talk:Charlotte Rae

message: Shorewood is a suburb of Milwaukee .
Car 54 Where Are You? was written and produced by Nat Hiken, a cousin of Charlotte Rae's who also wrote and produced Sargeant Bilko among other things. Another cousin of hersm Gerald Hiken, is a well-known character actor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.120.119 (talk) 00:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Charlotte Rae is mention in Will and Grace season 6, episode 16 as living in a retirement home for actors. The Facts of Life is referenced. For use in a potential "Popular culture" section.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 13:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will and Grace 

message: Change movef from Milwaukee to shorewood to Moved from the city of Milwaukee to Shorewood, a suburb and attended Shorewood High School 2601:248:0:8B2B:757B:C888:FE7F:9577 (talk) 02:43, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a reliable source for this. Fish+Karate 13:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2018
Talk:British Rail Class 03

message: Do we really have to have a purple 03 as the main image of this article? It's hardly representative, is it? Surely it should be a BR green or BR blue example, preferably while still in BR service. (The current second picture is much better in that respect!)
EdJogg (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - duly removed and replaced with better pic. from the Commons library. The Shildon photo is better, but not too keen on having the kid in the bottom left - if anyone else has a better shot of this original blue livery loco then please upload it. R-T-C (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 

message: The lead states that the 03s were the most sucessful BR 0-6-0 shunters, surely that accolade goes to the 08/09 classes? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 13:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most succesful?
Talk:British Rail Class 04

message: If class 04 locomotives were mechanically identical to class 03, why have two seperate classes? Barney Bruchstein (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The engines and transmissions were the same, but there were plenty of other differences. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identical to class 03 =
Talk:Charlotte Raven

message: I'm surprised she's considered noteworthy enough to have a page devoted to her anyway. I was actually a contemporary of hers at Manchester Uni but in all honesty her one claim to fame is being a former partner of Julie Burchill. --Archstanton 22:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of minor media personalities seem to have their own (often short, stub-like) WP articles. Apart from links to Raven's online Guardian, Observer and New Statesman columns and reviews, and a few relevant biographical data, this article consists mostly of uninteresting relationship-and-family stuff. (A long attack piece that depicted adverse reaction to one 2001 column by Raven as a major "controversy" consisted of editorialising and selective quoting, so I removed it.) – I'm not too familiar with WP:N and can't really say if a cultural commentator such as Raven merits a WP page. At any rate, it should contain more substantial information than it does now to be justified as a WP article. --Bwiki (talk) 02:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Kinabalu Park

message: Kinabalu Park is not a national park as stated in this article, but a State Park and the name should be Kinabalu Park (see: http://www.sabahparks.org.my/eng/kinabalu_park/default.asp). The malay name is also incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepilok2007 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the article title to the correct name. ќמшמφטтгמtorque 03:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Name for Kinabalu Park 
Talk:Charlotte Uhlenbroek

message: Uhlenbroek wasn't born on 4/1/1968 as per IMDb, but in 5/1967 as according to the birth index and the director check site. IMDb is a user-contributed work in progress and is no more reliable as a source in itself than WP. Crisso (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Charmaine Hooper

message: How come this article says Hooper has the record for national team goals with 71, when Christine Sinclair has scored at least 99 goals? And it seems this article was edited quite recently. 85.217.23.95 (talk) 12:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it says: Hooper has played a total of 131 times and scored 71 goals for Canada, both national records. However, Sinclair has now 168 caps and 120 goals, so Hooper is far behind. In Canada women's national soccer team#Top goalscorers Hooper is though clear second in goals, but in caps she is only fourth in that list. And note it is just top10 scorer list, so in caps she might even lower. 85.217.34.29 (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:British Rail Class 07

message: I think these locos were built with a very short wheelbase of 2.63m (as had the USA tank engines) to cope with the sharp curves in Southampton docks - they only seem to have worked there and otherwise an 09 could have done similar work? In contrast the 09 wheelbase is 3.51m.  Perhaps add this detail, however I can't find any refs for this - was this true???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.70.168 (talk) 18:47, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There were quite a few BR 0-6-0 Diesel shunters with a short wheelbase; in fact, apart from the large Diesel-electrics (the class 08/09/10 family), all had a wheelbase of  or less. These included classes  (),  (),  (),  (),  (),  (),  (),  (). Several of these were used on dock work. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Those seem to be diesel mechanical, lower power and slower (roughly half) of an '07 (but the 07 'failed' in service on the speed front due to hot axle boxes).  I believe the 07s were specified for the Southampton docks, which I have read had tighter radius curves compared to other extensively rail serviced dock areas, as no other loco had suitable characteristics (those with high enough power were too large, those with a short enough wheel base were not powerful enough).  I envisioned that the intro text could be changed from 'used in Southampton Docks' to 'designed for and used in Southampton Docks' and perhaps a reference to tight curves and heavy use requiring a new shunter design in the text somewhere.  I'll try to dig around for some references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.70.168 (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra detail
Talk:Oh My God (Kaiser Chiefs song)

message: In the Ronson/Allen version, the song sounds like there's a sample from a video game during the intro. I'm thinking a Nintendo Gameboy, any ideas? Tom Green (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample?
Talk:Charmian Carr

message: "The film was on the whole a very happy experience for her, however, during the filming of her dance scene with Rolf in the gazebo, the costumers had forgotten to put no-slip pads on her shoes, she slid through a window of the gazebo and she "had to complete the scene in agony".[4]"  
Really?  Right in the lede?  38.109.88.133 (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this belong in the lede?
Talk:British Rail Class 09

message: Should this be merged with the Class 08 article? They are, after all, essentially the same type of loco just with minor differences for operational reasons. 157.203.254.1 (talk) 09:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Class 08 Article? 

message: I am adding some tables to match the British Rail Class 08 article.  They may look untidy to begin with but please be patient. I will tidy up as soon as possible. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have finished adding the tables. The layout may not be ideal so suggestions for improvement are invited. Mock wurzel soup (talk) 23:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables
Talk:British Rail Class 10

message: 26/02/09 Class 10 D3476 has been collected from the Colne Valley Railway and is being transferred north by road to Thomson's, Stockton for scrap.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.226.149.189 (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: D3476 at Colne Valley Railway
Talk:Charnele Brown

message: And a bit of cleaning up.  What was she one of the first African-American in Sarafina to do?  First hired, first awarded, etc? The trivia section says she's married and the short article says she's single.  Did she ever start her own clothing business?--WPaulB 02:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certainly needs expansion 

message: Does Charnele still teach Acting? 2600:1700:87E0:5930:499F:FDA:4CAC:2270 (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting school
Talk:British Rail Class 11

message: Why? 59.148.180.109 (talk) 05:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the numbers were not in the TOPS scheme (which wasn't introduced until the early 1970s) but in the 1948 scheme, under which all diesels were numbered between 10000 snd 17999. The block 12000-12999 was allotted to ex-LMS diesel shunters, plus those of LMS design built after nationalisation. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 11, but numbers began with 12
Talk:British Rail Class 12

message: Suggest merging this article and British Rail Class D3/12
It seems that the two are effectively identical - the smaller batch could be mentioned in the introduction and in a sub setion.
I think it's quite normal to treate very similar models that differ only by a change of operator under the same article. (if they are operated in the same country)
Minor technical differences could be discused in the resultant article and I note that both articles are short.
I am not an expert on these machines so if this merge suggestion is substantially in error please ignore. Thanks.FengRail (talk) 05:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: There are a number of design and weight differences between the two classes which were produced by different designers more than a decade apart.--Das48 (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagree
Talk:Charytín Goyco

message: Using a variety of searches like this, all I find is Wikipedia mirrors. This should stay out unless someone can provide a reliable source to reference:
:On August 16, 2005, the day that Madonna suffered a horse riding accident, "Escándalo TV"'s castmates decided to play a hoax on their public, saying that Charytin, who had taken that day off, had suffered a fatal car accident and her husband was severely injured. Minutes later, Charytín, visibly surprised, arrived at the show to clarify the rumors. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.231.107.188 (talk) 02:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death hoax seems unverifiable

message: Seems a contrary edit by this editor who goes to other articles; signing them with link dates for user prefs summary edit tag while linking bare years. Ronbo76 05:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Every year de-linked.  Ronbo76 05:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And, it is very doubtful any of Charytin's years are linked except for her birthday. Ronbo76 05:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-links to years in this article 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Energy

message: Hi editors, I'm Daniel and I work for Florida Power & Light. I have an edit request to update the numbers in the article infobox I was hoping someone here might look at. I asked at WikiProject Companies as well but no one has responded. I'd really appreciate it! FPL Daniel (talk) 18:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida Power & Light  

message: An article which may be of interest to members of this project—2024 Lake Suviana explosion—has been proposed for merging with Lake Suviana. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. IgnatiusofLondon IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion for [[2024 Lake Suviana explosion]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 Lake Suviana explosion#Requested move 11 April 2024 (2) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:2024 Lake Suviana explosion#Requested move 11 April 2024 (2)]]
Talk:Ohne dich

message: There should be a distinction between the Rammstien Song, and The Eisbrecher Song of the same name.  Considering they are two different songs.  --Emevas (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Eisbrecher]] Song 

message: Claims about "Silent Spring" removed as unsupported.  What next, claims that it's a Christian song praising Jesus because there's a panoramic shot of a mountain peak topped with a cross?
:The interpretation as written is still rather inane. The birds going silent, the empty forest, counting hours, seconds not being worthwhile, breathing being hard, these are all allusions to modern trench warfare.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.12.60.210 (talk) 14:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Political" claims
Talk:Chase Blackburn

message: went to the same highschool as the crazed murderer of The Best Axe Man Ever Darrell Abbot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.46.49.98 (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:British Rail Class 14

message: Where did that ridiculous Great Bear/Teddy Bear story start?  We called them 'Teddy Bears' because of the 'sad eyes' expression of the cab windows when the loco was seen end-on.  The Great Bear was built 56 years before.  Nobody working at Swindon in 1964 would even remember it. 92.26.157.153 (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teddy Bears?
Talk:British Rail Class 15

message: See Talk:British Rail Class 16 for calculation. Biscuittin (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine displacement 

message: Should we call it a road switcher since it is designed for both mainline freight and yard switching duites?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.93.152.192 (talk) 22:53, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See the reply that I left at Talk:British Rail Class 14#Road Switcher? and also WP:MULTI. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Road Switcher?