Talk:Temple City, California

message: Would someone be so kind as to edit/put in links for the History section? I'm not really sure what to do with it...Inlumino 04:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added links to the History section. If anyone deems more links necessary, please add them --Mysteryperson956 10:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: We have a historical society? Anyway, I think Inlumino meant intra-wiki links. -- Poe Joe  (talk) 04:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section 

message: :Image:Seal temple city ca.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Seal temple city ca.png

message: Articles must be accompanied by citations when making major edits! DocOfSoc (talk) 03:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have incorporated many of your excellent ideas in the current edition. Make sure when you are rearranging sentences that you do not change the entire meaning of what is written. TY. DocOfSoc (talk) 04:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations are a must 

message: * Source article in the Whittier Daily News, dated May 4, 2011 said: "And now Wilson, 78, the rude ringleader who for years acted as if she owned the town and that it consequently owed her for what should be an essentially volunteer post, is the final thief of the public trust to fall." So she is 78 in 2011. Previously it was mentioned she was 76 in 2009. Ucla90024 (talk) 21:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cathe Wilson's age

message: Here is the original article claiming to have uncovered the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto: http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html
Here is the pseudonymous Satoshi (or someone posing as him) making his first public post since 2010. The poster refutes the article, saying "I am not Dorian Nakamoto": http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/forum/topics/bitcoin-open-source?commentId=2003008%3AComment%3A52186
Conversely, Dorian Nakamoto publically denies that he is Satoshi.
The Temple City page should not be modified to include Satoshi Nakamoto until the matter is settled.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.22.20.147 (talk) 04:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it should. It may be mentioned that it's a speculation; however, it's relevant, it's interesting, and it belongs to Wikipedia. Sources are there, people can draw their own conclusions. This thing definitely put Temple City on a map internet-wide. --Sigmundur (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

text: I restated the claim in a way that only states known facts and remains true even if Newsweek retracts their claim. Hopefully that's an acceptable compromise. 216.16.232.86 (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Satoshi Nakamoto