Talk:Casualties of the 7 July 2005 London bombings

message: I have now merged in the casualty details from the main article. Andy Mabbett 10:46, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from main article

message: The number of identified casualities listed in the chart should be updated, and will need to be updated continuously as more identifications are made.  The information in the chart doesn't reflect the information elsewhere in the article in this regard.  Moncrief 10:56, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
:It is a source of frustration that the dead are not being identified very quickly - the list of verified victims is up to date. the others are based on missing persons reported to the media. DavidP 04:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been looking hard for names, and we're still about 10 short of the "54" figure being bandied about, let alone the "74 families" with liaison/comfort officers. --Dhartung | Talk 00:27, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Identified in chart

message: Shouldn't the bombers be on this page, as identified bodies if nothing else? --Dtcdthingy 00:26, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The suspected bombers bodies havent been identified - that is why it is prudent to refer to them as 'alleged or suspected bombers'. some personal documents have been found on the scene for two of the suspects (but that doesnt mean they were carrying them at the time of the explosions). DavidP 04:22, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Putting them on this page is an invitation to vandalism or edit wars, I think. Also, since they are linked to their own articles, it encourages people to create articles for individual victims, which is contrary to "Wikipedia is not a memorial" guidelines. --Dhartung | Talk 00:25, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

text: I realise that, but OTOH, the 55 presumably includes them, so you'll be left with a gap when all other victims have been named --161.73.58.135 11:32, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That they're terrorists is an allegation; that they're bodies has been confirmed by the police. The only possible reason to omit them for now would be because they have not formally been ruled on by the coroner yet; but other names of this sort had already begun to creep into the list and I figure that official police statements are good enough. Certainly, even if we omit them now, they'll be in the list eventually. Doops |  talk 05:56, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombers? 

message: I have tried to improve page layout.  Previously the table and the template interacted to chop up the text nastily at the top of the page.  I am not wholly convinced that I have improved it much.  In particular, the table is now separated from the paragraph it relates to.  Perhaps somebody can do better? 195.157.197.108 09:55, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: The numbers in the intro, table, and list of casualties don't match. Andy Mabbett 21:34, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They still don't match (and the order of locations differs between the summary table and the detail list which is confusing). -- SGBailey 15:53, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: According to http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/050720/ids_photos_wl/r1227539137.jpg, one Turk was killed in the attacks, but not saying where. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 16:21, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably Gamze Gunoral, on the bus. -- Arwel 22:51, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I already added her. Gunoral's effects were found among the wreckage of the Piccadilly Line train. --Dhartung | Talk 03:17, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish dead 

message: Where can I find about the Colombian victim mentioned in the article? It is a victim or someone who just got injured?--ometzit<col> (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A complete list of those who were killed is presently available at 7 July 2005 London bombings#Victims. –Black Falcon (Talk) 17:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Colombian casualty/injured