Talk:Cocoa bean

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Cocoa bean. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111013152355/http://www.worldcocoafoundation.org/learn-about-cocoa/documents/CocoaMarketUpdateasof5.18.10.pdf to http://www.worldcocoafoundation.org/learn-about-cocoa/documents/CocoaMarketUpdateasof5.18.10.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319080151/http://childlabor-payson.org/Final%20Fourth%20Annual%20Report.pdf to http://childlabor-payson.org/Final%20Fourth%20Annual%20Report.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.khaleejtimes.com/Displayarticle09.asp?section=diversions&xfile=data%2Fdiversions%2F2012%2FFebruary%2Fdiversions_February12.xml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120412194832/http://childlabor-payson.org/Tulane%20Final%20Report.pdf to http://www.childlabor-payson.org/Tulane%20Final%20Report.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foodproductdesign.com/articles/cocoa-chocolate-cacao%2Cp2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cocoa bean. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100730065051/http://www.cadbury.com/ourresponsibilities/fairtrade/Pages/fairtrade.aspx to http://www.cadbury.com/ourresponsibilities/fairtrade/Pages/fairtrade.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.iccfo.ngo/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: hello guys i had a question about the cocoa bean. it's for a school project. does man have a piece for me?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.238.107.170 (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello 

message: Results: One third of the men did not use cocoa at baseline. The median cocoa intake among users was 2.11 g/d. After adjustment, the mean systolic blood pressure in the highest tertile of cocoa intake was 3.7 mm Hg lower (95% confidence interval [CI], −7.1 to −0.3 mm Hg; P = .03 for trend) and the mean diastolic blood pressure was 2.1 mm Hg lower (95% CI, −4.0 to −0.2 mm Hg; P = .03 for trend) compared with the lowest tertile. During follow-up, 314 men died, 152 of cardiovascular diseases. Compared with the lowest tertile of cocoa intake, the adjusted relative risk for men in the highest tertile was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.32-0.78; P = .004 for trend) for cardiovascular mortality and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39-0.72; P < .001) for all-cause mortality.
Because the study was removed from the article, want to preserve it here. Bod (talk) 21:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for doing so :). By chance, are you able to make sense of it? Because I sure as hell can't..a brief summary in layman's terms of its conclusions left here along with it in the record would be a good thing to have, I think. 2600:1702:4960:1DE0:E188:AB34:F849:5200 (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're replying to a three-and-one-half-year-old post, by an editor who has been blocked almost that long. I wouldn't expect any further response from Bod. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 13:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studies 

message: I had added fully-cited content from Fortune (magazine) about the fact that harvesting of cocoa in West Africa is being done by child/slave labour.
That has been deleted without any reason being given.
I cannot do another Revert because that would be edit warring. But I do object to the tactic being used and hope that other editors will agree that the content is valid. See below:
Peter K Burian (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: With unformatted text and source template, you are making a mess of the section and the reference format; Please slow down and see this edit from the Chocolate article, and go from there. --Zefr (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, Zefr; as per your suggestion, I have added a short version of the text, with correct formatting of the citation.(Child Slavery - Attempt at Reform section). Hopefully, this will resolve the issue. 
Peter K Burian (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the content about child/slave labour being deleted? 

message: In the section on "Cocoa trading", there is mention of pyrenoids, presumably as insecticides. This appears to be a typo and needs to be corrected. I do know what the original writer had in mind, but I propose either pyrethrum, which is mentioned in the reference by Finkelman et al. at the end of the same sentence or pyrethroids which sounds more similar to pyrenoids. kupirijo (talk) 11:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  pyrenoids? Or [[pyrethrum]] or [[pyrethroids]]?