Talk:Warriors (novel series)

message: I got an email from Harper Collins letting me know that a Warriors app for Iphone, Ipad, and Ipod Touch has been released. I don't know if this is something that should be in the article,but I thought I should let people know. If you think it would fit in the article feel free to add it.--Nyswimmer (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm... looks legit. Problem is going to be sourcing it. I will do my best... maybe Thursday? Brambleclawx 15:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warriors App 

message: The articles on all of the books in this series need to mention that they are children's fiction in their leads and infoboxes. Very few of them do.  The fact that they are about semi-anthropomorphized animals isn't necessarily indicative of this fact at all. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 11:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea what your link has to do with your point. But I'll go fix that. Brambleclawx 17:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Felt like a bot for the last 20 minutes... Brambleclawx 17:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chlidren's fiction 

message: Various IPs (and users) have been changing back and forth in the Dawn of the Clans section whether that series will: a) continue the storyline of Omen of the Stars, or b) go back to the early days of the clans. My understanding is that the authors said that it would be b), but I don't want to get in an edit war over this. I'd like to establish consensus on what the new series will be about, so that we can keep the correct version in the article. David1217 (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the only source was on Kate Cary's blog (the post was subsequently removed, however, but I believe I had a reference to her blog with a quote. So either go with b, find a source for a, or the best idea would be to leave out the section until a real source appears. Brambleclawx 04:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Dawn of the Clans'' 

message: Okay, so in the Clan terminology section sometimes people try to add "blackcough" as a deadly chest infection, and it always gets reverted. Blackcough is just greencough left untreated, but the cats refer to it as blackcough, so is it separate enough from greencough? Brambleberry of RiverClanmeow 20:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackcough 

message: Seriously this section does not exist and it is probably the biggest part of the books.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackstar167 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While it seems that at times the general personality of a Clan is a certain way, e.g. ThunderClan being brave and loyal, ShadowClan being sneaky and vile, every cat is an individual. Tigerstar was a ThunderClan cat at one time, and he certainly wasn't loyal to his leader. Tawnypelt is a ShadowClan warrior who is rather sweet. Not to mention, Blackstar is trying to right the Clan and give them a positive image. The most information that we could put in describing the Clans individually would be what type of land they enjoy (ThunderClan deciduous forests, ShadowClan coniferous forests, WindClan moor, and RiverClan marsh), which would fall under "Setting and characters". That section also includes what all Clans have in common. öBrambleberry_ meow _ watch me in action 22:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, we're trying too avoid too much in universe stuff. There's already a section describing how Clans function, and as Brambleberry says, there really is no difference between the Clans besides where they live and minor adaptations to this; for example, we can't say ShadowClan is the evil Clan, because the whole series is written ThunderClan's perspective, so of course ThunderClan will seem to be the best. Brambleclawx 04:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Clan section describing the clans 

message: The Warriors Wiki has confirmed that the title of the seventh Super Edition is going to be Bramblestar's Storm, but the only two links are Victoria Holmes' Facebook page. Would that be reliable enough for time being until there is more confirmation? öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Bramblestar's Storm'' 

message: I think it would be great if the omnibus field guide could be merged with Field Guides even though it's made of two field guides. It would make the article more short and simple. 50.43.166.233 (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  Brambleclawx 02:23, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Tigerclaw's Fury is not a super edition; this has been fixed. Bramblestar's Storm doesn't currently have any reliable source, so it is not yet included due to the lack of a source. Brambleclawx 16:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Omnibus Field Guide?

message: Leafpool's WIsh has been released. 173.56.75.215 (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We are aware, thanks. Brambleclawx 14:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Oh, ok. Awesome! I noticed, thank you so much. Brambleclawx 14:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

text: That's great! Wikipedia is always looking for more people to help out! Brambleclawx 14:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leafpool's Wish 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Warriors (novel series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080709065338/http://www.ala.org/ala/booklist/speciallists/speciallistsandfeatures1/top10fantasybooks.cfm to http://www.ala.org/ala/booklist/speciallists/speciallistsandfeatures1/top10fantasybooks.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I was just wondering if anyone has started to make a part in the article for the new book, Thunder and Shadow. I know it was just released this month, so I'm not expecting an answer to this yet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PitbullAJWarriorsSurvivorsLover (talk • contribs) 20:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thunder and Shadow 

message: I temporarily removed good article from the page because it currently has lots of issues, a good article can't have issues. Also, there is a chunk of unreferenced stuff.117.232.108.17 (talk) 18:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I havw added a Good article reassesment request for this article, there are 2 sections which doesn't have even a single reference. Hopefully the problems can be fixed. King Prithviraj II (talk) 14:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Responding to the request. The article is massive and lacking in many references. I feel it is a long way from GA status. Will ping  the editor that brought it to Good Article status first before opening a formal assessment. AIRcorn (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: The biggest issue plaguing this page right now is that entire books are being explained in great detail in their sections on this page. I'm not sure how to shorten them all effectively but i'm pretty sure we shouldn't have entire, spoilerific entries on here. If anyone with a little more knowledge on what's an appropriate amount of info for a Wikipedia article would like to make these changes, please do! I have already shortened a few sections for some of the mini-stories as I can only assume what was there before was essentially the whole book (since they were short books anyway). This article looks good at a glance but is actually a mess of TOO MUCH INFORMATION! DrAaronStein (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions/Synopsis needs to be shortened 

message: I see the same series of books, in English, with both the "Warriors" and the "Warrior Cats" series title. (Do a Google image search for "Forest of Secrets" to see what I mean.) Is this an old vs new series name, or maybe British vs American? The Wikipedia article doesn't mention "Warrior Cats" at all, but the official website is listed as warriorcats.com. I would love to see this clarified in the Wikipedia article. --Peter (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, "Warrior Cats" is the original, U.K. title and "Warriors" is the U.S. title. Oornery (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: From my understanding having read the books since around 2006, I think that the term "Warrior Cats" has mainly been used to distinguish the series from other properties such as  The Warriors (1979) film or book and various sports teams that use the name "Warriors". The only books I've seen listed as "Warrior Cats" were translations and the only ones showing the text untranslated were the German versions for some reason. DrAaronStein (talk) 05:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Warriors" or "Warrior Cats"? 

message: The book The Darkness Within was released on November 10th 2020, and today is November 14th. When will it be updated? If soon, I might be able to give a basic-ish synopsis.
lighstreame (talk) 17:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to be bold and make this edit yourself! Brambleclawx 01:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New Books?

message: We need to put the Warrior Code in somewhere. I'd do it myself, but I'm not entirely sure how it goes. Pinging  and .
Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Rosefeather; I don't think we actually need to put the warrior code into the article. That level of in-universe detail is generally considered excessive for a Wikipedia article (the perspective being, if someone didn't know anything about Warriors came to read about this article, they would be interested in learning about things like a general idea of what the plots are about, who the authors are and what inspired them, associated media, etc., but unless they were an actual reader of the series, they generally wouldn't be interested in, or even really understand, what the warrior code is, if we just presented it as a list within the article). That's my opinion, anyway. Brambleclawx 03:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrior Code 

message: Does someone want to add the map images? I don't know the image addresses and my browser is blocked (long story about how I get onto WP), or I'd do it myself.
Thanks, Rosefeather of WindClan (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The map images are under copyright by HarperCollins, and I don't think it meets criteria for "fair-use". It's also too in-universe to be meaningful to most readers, and I'm not aware of the map having been discussed by a major third-party source in a way that would make a discussion of the map notable in the article. Brambleclawx 20:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps 

message: Hello! I'm putting this here because it's an issue across multiple Warriors articles on Wikipedia. Some articles are written with the date format Americans use (example: February 4, 2008), and some are written with the format British people use (example: 1 June 2004). I know it was stated that this specific article uses the British format in order to mirror the original British publication of the Warriors series, but if that is the case, should all Warriors articles undergo this change as well, in order to remain consistent? Blubewwy (talk) 17:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies in the way dates are written 

message: The content said Coolabi Production signed a deal with 'Tencent Pictures' even though in the 2 citation articles, it was 'Tencent Video'. Was it an error from the citation article or was it an error by the wiki content? Since the two company were indeed under the same umbrella, Tencent, but were separate. Tencent Video is a streaming service (similar to Netflix) while Tencent Pictures is a production and distributor. I'll change it for now to follow the citation, if there's anything, feel free to clarify here. BlueHelvetical (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was just a mistake on the end of whoever first mentioned the deal in the article. Thanks for fixing it. Blubewwy (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the new animation deal