lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brown Girl, Brownstones

message: exceptionally famous book, actually proposed for deletion in 2007!!DGG 01:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be famous - but little in the article establishes that as a fact. More analysis and referencing of this would help. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:String Quartet (Ravel)

message: Has anyone noticed how the second movement seems to have the same theme as the Sanyo cell phone ring tone "Tone 7"?
Kmill 01:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1 link removed- concert footage - No indication from clip infromation of uploader profile that they have rights to the footage concerned.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Tube link removal 

message: What about sources on this page? Discovered some facts in The New Grove Dictionary of Music that seems to divert from this text. They say Ravel participated in the Prix de Rome competition but not in 1904 and never with his string quartet! I am just curious if there is another source where theese facts come from! All the best. Mikael Olofsson (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I deleted the info-box added a while ago, feeling it was unhelpful duplication, as i-bs often are, but I think this may be a borderline case, and I wonder if other interested editors think it will or won't help our readers. Comments earnestly invited... Tim riley talk 19:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, it does look very basic and superfluous, though I would retain the image next to the lead (without the infobox, of course). Toccata quarta (talk) 20:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's helpful, as it selects some tidbits about the subject but does not really give a balanced, meaningful "at-a-glance" understanding of the piece. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info-box 

message: Hi. Four hands by Maurice Delage does exist. It can be found e.g. at this entry at BnF or at this IMSLP entry. Also a y2009 CD can be found here. I'm not sure what are good citations for music articles, so I leave it to someone.
My last edit mentioned it as a 2-piano 4-hand, but it's probably a "normal" 4-hand, i.e. for a single piano. Anyway since all sources simply mention it simply as "4 hands", we should simply write so. (The sheet music looks consistent, too.)
FYI: What's confusing is that the above mentioned CD was titled "Debussy/Ravel: Transcriptions For Two Pianos". Its jacket also reads "String Quartet in F major (transcription originally for four hands by M. Delage)". I guess the arragement by Delage is actually for one piano, but that CD was recorded using two pianos.--Teika kazura (talk) 07:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. The BnF citation will do admirably - and now added. Thank you. Tim riley talk 10:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources of piano 4 hands
Talk:Prototype This!

message: Discovery seems to have removed it from their line-up as of January 2009, which random other shows filling the Wednesday at 10 PM slot here in the US. Has the show been canceled?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.20.68 (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canceled 

message: I changed the aired dates for episodes 11-13. The source given for E11 is a broken link. Based on what I read above, in the Canceled section, it is likely that Discovery has set air dates for this show in some locations but not others. Based on a google search I am unable to find the correct air dates from any source. http://tv.nytimes.com/show/198827/Prototype-This-/overview says "Most Recent Episode - Virtual Sea Adventure" but this could just be an out of date page. The closet I can find to proving the old dates is by http://video.tvguide.com/Results.aspx?primary=Search&searchvalue=Prototype%20This!&display_mode=details&length=fullepisode witch has posted dates a few days after the page said the shows aired, however this does not say exactly that the shows aired on these dates. In an earlier search I discovered a torrent for E11-13 in Russian, but I can not find the English versions. This could mean that some locations in the world have aired the show but not others.R00m c (talk) 06:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates to unaired
Talk:Eric Theodore Andres

message: The article I think was quite rightly tagged as a candidate for speedy deletion because it was not only orphaned, but no significance to this individual was provided.
This gentleman was the namesake of the USS Andres (DE-45), which I have now specified not only in this article but in the ship's article as well.
I'm fully aware that this article is still pretty short on detail, but I feel like being the namesake for a commissioned US Navy ship certainly provides the necessary significance and notability for this article to remain on Wikipedia.
I'm certainly glad to discuss this further.  I'm positive there are several other similar biographical vignettes found in the DANFS, so I think it would be valuable to consider the deletion or retention of this article within the larger context of its related articles.
Honestly, I'm not too riled up about this article, but it's perfectly worthwhile, seemingly accurate information that seems a shame to toss in the trash as long as it serves some purpose.
--Quintote (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To delete, or not to delete...
Talk:Ohr Somayach, Monsey

message: This article reads like an advertisement.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Talmudscholar (talk • contribs) 
*Please sign all your comments with the four ~~~~ tildes. Thank you, IZAK 10:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: First off, I'm impressed that this article does not read like an ad.  Now it need sources.  Anyone?  Anyone?  Bueller?  Joe407 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Phosphaalkyne

message: Phosphaalkyne should redirect to tert-Butylphosphaacetylene, which is a phosphaalkyne.  If we do that, then this article should be shifted to cyaphide, which is the main subject of this article. --Smokefoot (talk) 21:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That is probably the easiest way of straightening this page out out. However, it would leave no top-level article on the phosphaalkyne functional group. There have been several reviews on its chemistry (, , ). Sadly I can't access any of them - so I can't make any useful contributions beyond pointing this out.--Project Osprey (talk) 09:26, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I will write a short overview on phosphaalkynes, solving the problem. I will chem the reviews that you cite and maybe some others. --Smokefoot (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed renaming

message: I currently working on a more comprehensive page detailing the phosphaalkyne functional group, so much of the content currently on the page can probably be moved to the tert-Butylphosphaacetylene page.--BASkeel (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing to keep in mind is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a specialist journal.  As an encyclopedia, articles are expected to rely on references to reviews and books (see WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY). --Smokefoot (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reworking the page
Talk:Toronto Ontarios

message: I would like to know your source before I edit the description of the Shamrocks sweater. 
According to Holzman/Nieforth's Deceptions and Doublecross book (probably the best source ever for NHA's history), on page 71, it says that Livingstone abandoned the Ontarios' orange sweaters in favour of green ones. Citing an article from Charlie Good entitled "Ontarios Are Now The Shamrocks And Will Be Wearin' Of The Green" from the Toronto Daily News, 18 January 1915 p.1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannyduke (talk • contribs) 18:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toronto Shamrocks uniform
Talk:Philbert

message: I misspelled Philbert and got this when I was looking for Filburt from Rocko's Modern Life. I just added my change because I think people are going to do the same.
Toolofthesystem 06:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted to what seems to be the last sensible version of the page... Thparkth (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Esek Hopkins

message: Whether right or wrong, a number of people have interpreted this name as "Ezek" or "Ezekiel" or "Ezekial" Hopkins. Student7 (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: Reporting his immediate family may be of some use. Reporting who they married, what kids they had, etc. etc. seems rather beside the point IMO. If the in-laws were truly famous, it would be another matter, I suppose. Student7 (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: Among some, he's most famous for the portrait (now in the U.S. Naval Academy Museum) which shows him standing in front of a version of the "First Navy Jack" (rattlesnake flag).  Maybe an image of the original portrait could be included... AnonMoos (talk) 02:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag Portrait

message: You may be interested in these Possible problems with early US whistleblower coverage.  The articles I've been looking at relate to the last two paragraphs of "Revolutionary War Service" in this article.TuxLibNit (talk) 22:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Possible problems with early US whistleblower coverage  

message: If Professor Allison Stanger's book and articles are to be believe this bio of Hopkins is extraordinarily charitable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.213.194.59 (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias? 

message: The minutes of Congress are a source for what was resolved in Congress, but not for Hopkins's subsequent institution of criminal libel proceedings against Marven and Shaw is single-handedly responsiblefor the resolution of Congress. That is an unsubstantiated inference by the editor. Creuzbourg (talk) 22:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minutes of Congress. Reliable source?
File talk:Exposé - Seasons Change (sample).ogg

message: This media is 30.5 sec, a bit longer than recommended by Wikipedia:Music samples; total song length is 4 min 17 sec, so should be 25.7 sec, but a lot of bits are already chopped out of this sample and I'd struggle to make it shorter without making it less useful. Deco 02:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length note
Talk:List of Record of Lodoss War episodes

message: There is a lack of the Chronicles of the Heroic Knights descriptions.  This is the fault of myself, of course.  I have the boxed set of the series, but I haven't had the time to sit down and watch the episodes (because let's face it, it's 27 episodes -- not something to cover all at once).
Because of the nature of Welcome to Lodoss Island, however, I'll also create episode descriptions for those episodes as well. -Emhilradim 02:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, I know I said I'd add in the descriptions 4 months ago, but, I haven't gotten around to it.  I might not be getting to it for a while, so if anyone else would like to help, you're more than welcome.  Like I said before, it's 27 episodes...  That's a lot of time.  Each episode is approximately 21 minutes long that's 9 1/2 hours. -Emhilradim 10:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Chronicles Descriptions at this time 

message: There I finally added all the episode synopses for both the OVA and the TV series and enjoyed watching them to do so. I have also watched the Legend of Crystania movie and OVA but I cannot bear to sit through them again just to fill out a synopsis so if someone can be kind enough to do that for me, I would be very grateful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.231.110.229 (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode synopses for OVA and TV series completed 
Talk:SAINT (institute)

message: The external link says that World Scientific Publishing is the publisher.  The dean is the editor-in-chief, but this fact is only relevant to his biographical page, not this one. YooChung 02:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journal publisher 

message: There is not enough content nor is there anything indicating that the institute itself is notable, so the subject does not seem to need its own page. YooChung 02:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Sungkyunkwan University]]
Talk:Tan beret

message: Is there any good reason for a color of beret to have it's own page? Burzmali 02:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to be rude, but what article?  All this page has is a collection of where tan berets are used.  Who do you envision looking for an article on tan berets that wouldn't be satisfied by looking at Beret or the page for the military involved.  Burzmali 13:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your question was "Is there any good reason for a color of beret to have it's own page"? The answer is yes.   Ng.j 20:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Bernardo Berro

message: As currently listed is probably wrong. Have read that Flores was assassinated and that Berro - despite apparently not being involved - was found on the street with a firearm and was executed by the police. Don't have an authoritative source for that yet, though. -116.232.136.154 (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Seraphimblade 2

message: – riana_dzasta 02:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Can you provide diffs of misleading and/or unhelpful comments?  Friday (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really interested, the talk pages tell the story.  For the record, however, it has nothing to do with the candidate's positions on the matters as much as the candidate's way of handling it. --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about badlydrawnjeff's oppose
Talk:Vistula Spit

message: Could use some review, as it makes some questionable claims (calling them an "Old Prussian tribe" — it's possible there's a connection, but it's not currently supported in either article). Also, I would appreciate a source for the statement that their geographic range extended as far as the Vistula Spit and Gdańsk, as the article Kursenieki makes no mention of it, except in an image. 70.172.194.25 (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kursenieki section
Talk:Gdańsk Pomerania

message: This used to be a proper (albeit somewhat short (though not really, almost DYK sized)) article about the historical and geographic region  before it was changed into a redirect, effectively deleting the existing article without a proper AfD discussion,  - in fact there was no discussion about this anywhere what so ever.
Currently the article redirects to Pomeranian Voivodeship, which is a modern political entity. However, the previous article was about a historical term, which is still often used. In fact, in the previous article, which was effectively deleted without an AfD, the text clearly stated that it is a "a geographical region in northern Poland covering eastern part of Pomeranian Voivodeship" - hence, Gdańsk Pomerania is part of, but not equivalent to the modern voivodeship. We don't redirect Silesia to Lower Silesian Voivodeship so I'm not sure why we would want to do this here. If anything I guess "Gdańsk Pomerania" could redirect to Pomeralia (or possibly, vice versa) and it is true that in some contexts those terms are used interchangeably. Strangely enough, inter wiki links to that article were also removed, right prior to the redirecting . Additionally a 'merge' template had been previously removed by User Olessi  for the very excellent reason that the proposed merger was never discussed or brought up on talk. In fact, the only comments made in edit summaries very clearly opposed that proposed merger (for example here).
There's also the article Eastern Pomerania but merging these two articles was also opposed, as evidence by the creation of this one . Additionally the term "Eastern Pomerania" is not very much in use, compared to "Gdańsk Pomerania" - it's sort of like referring to Wales as "Western UK"; makes sense geographically but not very common.
Anyway, bottom line is that the previously existing article was erased/deleted without - and in fact in opposition to the apparent - consensus and the present redirect doesn't make sense.
So I think that we should either restore the old version of the article or redirect it to something other than a modern day political entity.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is rather obvious case. The term exists, as does the location. There is no need for redirect.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 12:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

text: I concur, not seeing any reason for redirecting. If there is no consensus for redirecting, which is a form of deletion, the article should be restored, and if anybody disagrees, nominated for deletion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:President of Senegal

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to List of presidents of Senegal. (non-admin closure)  — YoungForever(talk)  23:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: List of President of Senegal →  – I expect this move is uncontroversial, but since this page has an incredibly messy move history going back many years, I figured we should have a clear WP:CONSENSUS on where it should stay. "List of President of Senegal" is an incoherent title. It is both grammatical nonsense and factually misleading, since there is more than one item in the list. There are also hundreds of "List of presidents of" and "List of prime ministers of" pages on Wikipedia, and this is the only one that is of the form "List of president of". I know that consistency between different countries' pages is a touchy subject, but the consensus on how this type of title should be written seems settled. Astrophobe (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this is currently a list, and so it should still be titled "List of" and everything else can redirect here until someone decides that they want to write a separate article about the office itself. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2020
Talk:Pan Mei-chen

message: I have added the Bio-Dispute tag as this article seems favourable and offers no references -- V. berus 02:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bio-Dispute

message: Is "...many fine CDs..." a neutral statement? -- V. berus 02:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Some structure required: Introduction, Awards, References, Links, etc. -- V. berus 02:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure
Talk:Sztutowo

message: There is an image of the flag of Sztutowo located here, which purports to have been taken from the official website  in 2000, but which is no longer found there.  If this flag is still current, it could be added to the template.  Many versions of the COA found on the WWW have the ship body in yellow and the sea & sky in cyan, corresponding to the colors of this flag, rather than the brownish and blue tints of the COA on the current Sztutowo website.  Is there an official specification?  (Polish governmental symbols are not subject to copyright.)  --Ziusudra 12:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag and coat of arms
Talk:George Britton Halford

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Poetry in Motion (film)

message: It's not clear at all that the film has any reference to the song. Moreover, the film gets all the top google hits, so I put the film back as the first hit. I left Poetry in Motion as a redirect page so it can be discussed/changed without much problem. If anyone can give a more specific reason that the song should be the primary page please discuss. Whisperednumber (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: move

message: There are a few songs with the same title as this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.140.218.179 (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So? Not an issue until there are articles on them, then we can disambig.Whisperednumber 16:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Er, there are songs with the same title. 

message: When I was in college and we showed this film, Mann himself came down from Toronto to talk about it afterwards (we also showed, the next day, Imagine the Sound). I recall one line of his which brought down the house, such as it was:
Somehow I think Bukowski would have liked that. Apparently he had some great unedited footage from the whole conversation ... he joked about releasing it as My Dinner With Bukowski. He also describes Bukowski as the film's "anti-narrator" in that he's really not celebrating the poetry you're seeing read.
Obviously we can't use this in the article as is, but I wonder if Mann might have said something similar elsewhere in a reliable source that we can use. It might make a good addition to the article. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something Mann said in an appearance ... has he said it elsewhere?
Talk:Mr. Jones (Mike Jones song)

message: CUrrent?--64.121.37.179 21:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cidadania

message: Many news sites in Brazil, mainly blogs, are not reliable sources. Many sites exists only because political party and government funding only to slander political opponents. I'm talking it because PPS was classified as a right-wing political party in a recent edition by a user who used a widely-known biased pro-Workers Party blog (Brasil247) which had even received funds of corruption schemes to slander political opponents as a source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:D41:2110:C900:47B:ABC9:4202:515B (talk) 02:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caution with brazilian sources 

message: PPS ceased to exist in 2019 and was refounded as CIDADANIA (Citizenship). It would be good to change the name of the page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.17.76.224 (talk) 03:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change page name
Talk:List of gurdwaras in Canada

message: Vancouver Island is not a part of Vancouver, also it's "New Westminster" not "New West Minister" :) gorffy 02:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: These should be sourced and added here eventually.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from List of gurdwaras
Talk:John Charles Bowring

message: Wikipedia Assessment Drive Yamara 02:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Not worthy of comment in main article, but perhaps of interest to passing researchers, and perhaps not the same person, might be an auction, by Messrs. Christie Manson & Woods, on 26 November 1903, “The Property of J. C. Bowring, Esq., deceased, late of Forest Farm, Windsor Forest”. I was interested in the Dow 1887. (My pictures #20702/3.) But ten years after decease: different person? Error in article? I know not. JDAWiseman (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wine auction 