Talk:One-night stand

message: I think that maybe someone should discuss the prevelence of Alcohol fuelled one night stands. The article doesn't even mention it, whereas I'd guess that the majority of one night stands, at least in the UK, are alcohol related...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.36.199 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 21 April 2007
Can you get sources or research to back up this statement? --Saab 1989 (talk) 19:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Drink

message: Anonymous sex redirects here.  Links in the "see-also" of this page and on the casual sex page seem to suggest that there once was a separate page, but I see no discussion of it here.  I think that anonymous sex is not the same as a one-night stand: anonymous sex is necessarily with a stranger, and is necessarily a one-night stand, but one-night stands might not necessarily be with a stranger and thus might not be anonymous sex.  Am I making any sense?  Cazort 02:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous Sex Redirect

message: Does a one night stand imply that sex has occurred between the two parties? Or would heavy petting suffice to call it a one night stand?--Secretss (talk) 09:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It usually means sex has taken place. Flyer22 (talk) 07:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you people implying heavy petting isn't? Konaya (talk) 20:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is sex implied? 

message: The article seems well presented, without POVs or original research, yet it has been tagged with "The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject." Moreover, there is no substantiation of this tagging here in the Talk Page. I suggest that the tag should be removed. -The Gnome (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Flyer22 (talk) 07:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Worldwide view" tag

message: I find it amusing how the Risks try to hide by using a small section heading. Maybe its because I cannot find anything on "preticyrine". I really hope this is due to a mistake, inventing a disease to scare people is under no circumstances acceptable. Also "it is mainly recommended to refrain from having sex with unknown partners" by whom? I suggest any form of veiled moralisation should be removed. --88.72.234.207 (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Risks

message: Is a link to a list of sexual positions relevant with one-night stands? I'd've thought it'd be relevant regardless of the type of encounter, thus not needing to be specifically linked? 94.192.52.244 (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''See also...'' 

message: WTF was this listed for deletion? Handschuh-talk to me 11:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL! Read the AfD discussion tagged at the top. I also disagree with it being nominated for deletion, and so did others apparently. It just needs fixing up. Flyer22 (talk) 04:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 

message: Seem's a bit biased to me, and without any reference or evidence.   Seems like a mutual relationship to me, despite the aftermath.    This discussion is opinion and not factual.  If its not rape, then it takes two to tango. --71.245.164.83 (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woman's views of One Night Stands 

message: : A one-time sexual encounter is not necessarily a one-night stand (i.e a one time sexual encounter within a relationship), the defining of a one-night stand is the absence of expectation or intention that the relationship will be extended beyond the initial sexual encounter.
The parenthesis seems to define "one-night stand" as "a one time sexual encounter within a relationship".  Is that intended? —Tamfang (talk) 22:56, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article was a mess overcomplicating the simple concept of a one-night stand being a single sexual encounter with another person. Cleaned up. --Xagg (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  remedial grammar 

message: The given examples of participants are not backed by any source and seem to be based on personal opinion or maybe personal experience. Hula Hup (talk) 05:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased examples

message: I'm surprised the studies showing the elementary fact that women have it much easier to get one-night stands as opposed to men have not been mentioned. Being lazy, I'm not gonna invest my time into looking into this but I'd appreciate if anyone could rectify this lacuna. Of course, it's an elementary biological fact that anyone not blind knows, but still I'd like to see it highlighted in the article. Regards, Miacek  (talk) 15:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some lacunae 

message: This article is utter trash: almost a third consists of quotes from trashy relationship paperbacks written by "relationship therapists" and the structure, bizarrely consisting of a definition and the sections "Further relationships" and "Views", would be a joke even for something written by a middle school student. This should be limited to a Wiktionary entry and expanded with etymology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C6:3F0E:BA8D:A0E6:E6C6:6083:398E (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominate for deletion