lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chisanbop

message: "Chisenbop" appears to be a misspelling. "Chisanbop" is a more accurate romanization of 지산법. It is also used in books such as The Complete Book of Chisanbop by Hang Young Pai. I suggest making Chisanbop the main article and having a redirect from Chisenbop to Chisanbop. Davidimai 09:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of chisanbop 

message: According to The Complete Book of Chisanbop by Hang Young Pai, chisanbop was created in the 1940s in Korea by Sung Jin Pai and revised by his son Hang Young Pai. It was brought to the U.S. around 1977 by Hang Young Pai. "Chisanbop" was registered as a U.S. trademark in 1980 but the trademark expired in 1987. I find no support for the statement "It is said to be of ancient Korean origin." Davidimai 09:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of chisanbop 

message: One of the reasons this counting method may be easy to remember is that it is analogous to many common currency systems.  For example, US currency has coin denominations of 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 cents, as well as bills of 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 dollars.  (There's a discrepancy between 10 and 50 in this case, as the coin is 25 cents and the bill is 20 dollars, and the 50+ cent and 50+ dollar denominations are less commonly used, but the concept is there.)  And most other nations have similar systems for their currency (sometimes varying by order of magnitude), stressing the 1's and 5's in each of the significant places.  So we are already used to counting in this way whenever we handle money.  (This makes it unlike binary finger counting, because most people outside of the computer industry are not used to counting in binary.)  Should this be mentioned in the article?  Lurlock (talk) 02:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also rather like the numbers that each distinct letter represents in roman numerals — and probably several other number systems.  I guess it's just a convenient compromise between simplicity and conciseness.  —DIV (1.145.51.120 (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to money
Talk:Electronuclear force

message: This is not what the word "electronuclear" means. An electronuclear effect is one that involves a nucleus and an electron, such as electron-nucleon scattering. The term appears to have been used once in a 1983 paper in the sense suggested by this article, but one usage hardly makes an encyclopedic term. This article should be deleted or redirected to the standard terminology "grand unified theory". For now, I'll adopt the latter. -- Xerxes 19:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:ARB

message: Are any of these worthy of encyclopedia articles?  If so, please write the article and restore the entry to the page.
* Accident Report Book (United Kingdom)
* Adaptive rate-based (congestion control)
* Africa Research Bulletin
* Air Resources Board (California)
* American Research Bureau
* Appraisal review board
* Architecture Review Board (OpenGL and others)
* Armored rifle battalion
* Army Resources Board (United States)
* Arth-Rigi-Bahn, a Swiss mountain railway
* Assessment review board (several)
* Asset Recovery Business (Dell, Inc.)
Tedernst | talk 19:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: redlinks

message: I changed the entry for Administrative Review Board — the old wording calling it a "Tribunal".  This is an error, and confusing, becuause the Board is a followon to the Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which were, of course, Tribunals.  --  Geo Swan 17:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor formatting
Talk:Fracture toughness

message: ould somebody cite sources for the table?  Granted, most of the materials listed are not exact alloys, but the values are very different from values I have seen in a different source. Hithisishal (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Suppose I have a sheet of material of known fracture toughness. The dimensions of the sheet are known. Presumably I can predict now how much load the sheet can bear before it cracks, and how thick the sheet should be to allow it to bear a given load. But the article gives no relationship between KIc and the force at which fracture occurs. (This should be related to the question for an accurate test above, but is more general.)  --Lambiam 04:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Operational meaning is missing
Talk:Fundació Joan Miró

message: This photograph may be better suited to the Mercury Fountain article. --Dystopos 20:08, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's not really ideal for the Fundació, but unfortunately the other photos I took that day are even worse.  I'll certainly put it on that article, and I'll leave it to your judgement as to whether it's worthwhile having the image here. Either way I think the Fundació article should link to Mercury Fountain. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: photo
Talk:The South End/Talk 2004

message: I've done some editing and moved the text below from the article to bring it closer to NPOV:
:The quality of the issues of the issues fluctuates between near professional grade comparable to a suburban city newspaper at times, and high school paper amateurishness most of the time. Signs of these amateurishness include: scattered mispellings, inexplicable paragraph breaks, mislabeled jumps, incorrectly structured articles, pixelated photographs obviously taken from websites, pointless filler, and random, unreliable distribution. The website sometimes lags behind the print issues, with some print issues never making it online; the reverse also happens occasionally.
Hopefully the article won't be deleted now. BCorr|Брайен 11:26, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As a wsu student, I can tell you that alot of what that paragraph you cut says is tru. "scattered mispellings," well, I can't talk. "inexplicable paragraph breaks," happen alot in the inner pages, like the article wasn't long enough so they just put in random breaks to make it fit. "mislabeled jumps, incorrectly structured articles," that's going into journalism jargon, so I can't talk their ether. "pixelated photographs obviously taken from websites," tru that. "random, unreliable distribution." very tru that, they have the stands for it all over campus, but its like the delivery people toss a coin and go like, today we'll deliver to the student center but not to science hall. I almost get the feeling they don't want me to read there paper. 141.217.173.178 22:13, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As another WSU student, I can also tell you that the bad distribution is a fact, not a POV. Someone told me the other day that they did an article on Eminem in last Monday's issue. I never saw that issue in print, though it is on the website. The other items listed, such as bad spelling, are also facts. But I would at least like the opportunity to criticize those things on a regular basis. Robert Happelberg 20:51, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Category talk:Mining disasters

message: Should this cat now be renamed Mining accidents and disasters
:that was my comment, I forgot to sign. Youngamerican 19:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename? 

message: since there is already a mining disasters in the united states category, it would be tidier to link that here and move all US mining disasters into it. So I did.--Jackyd101 09:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: organise
Talk:Mexican Mint

message: Cómo llega mi crédito personal 149.19.169.221 (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Margarito A. R
Talk:The South End/Talk 2005

message: :Detroit having three new casinos led to the discontinuation of the horoscope.
An interesting hypothesis, except: why would the casinos care what the horoscope of a student paper said? The Student Council objecting would be a more credible hypothesis. Robert Happelberg 22:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrior Spirit Horoscope 

message: Theirs a lot of truth to the south end and the black panthers. They was in league in the 70s. just for starters, Look over these links:
* Revolutionary struggles of Black workers in the 1960s
* LRBW Activist dies in Detroit
* A movement has to control its own voice
* Lynn Marcus. . .Panthers, Angela Davis,Cops and common sense
:I will review those links, and also look at archived South Ends from the applicable period. Robert Happelberg 20:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Black Panthers 

message: man, the south end really sucks these days! looks like crap
An opinion removed from the article:
Some believe that the 2002-2003 school year was the pinnacle of The South End's journalistic credibility and overall excellence. The coverage of the War in Iraq, the first anniversary of 9/11, national championships for the Warriors' teams as well as coverage of statewide elections helped make The South End respectable.
Sur, whatever.
How bout 2005? Teh moron-in-cheif of the south end, Adam Steinberg, wants to be called "Adam Aurr" now. What a dumass! You can call me Mike Alwaysright while your at it.
:Today Adam Steinberg put a note in the paper admitting he couldn't use the pen name "Adam Aurr" anymore because just now he realizes it's against the bylaws of the paper. I had heard lots of good things about Adam Steinberg (all of them from the time before he was Editor-In-Chief). But this one act of utter stupidity completely vacates any good impression I may have had of him. Robert Happelberg 20:13, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  these days 

message: An anonymous user with IP address 69.246.43.19 added the following to the error log:
:December 10. Adam Steinberg was sacked on Friday after a three meeting. The Pub-board went into a secret closed session and then announced their decision. It was the last act of outgoing student chair. The new student chair has been fired twice by Steinberg for failing to turn in articles on time. He claims there is no conflict of interest. At the time of the decision the board had four empty seats. The board went on record saying it refused to cite specific reason. It also went on record that they believed that did not have announce the exact vote. The ramifications of decisions are striking. The pub board has now set a precedent of being able to sack any editor-in-chief at any time for no specific reason.
This is very interesting, but not the point of the error log. Also, one line describing the Oracle as "pseudo-humorous" was amended by 69.246.43.19 to read just "humorous". I agree with neither assessment. I think "non-humorous" would be more appropriate, but that's just my opinion. Robert Happelberg 14:55, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim about Publication Board
Talk:Wiz-War

message: The "victory conditions" section seems redundant with the "winning" section of cards & rules, no? MGaladrielC 04:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This section needs to be generally cleaned up and organized. cpro 16:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winning 

message: A history of Wiz-War section would be useful. It could go through the various editions and changes. cpro 17:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I separated some material out into the start of a history section. I'll see what I can dig up on a timeline, but if anyone else has concrete facts, feel free to chip in. Be bold, as they say. Rossumcapek 06:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: There's an interesting discussion about whether gameplay strategies belong on the page describing the game in Talk:Settlers of Catan/game guide versus encyclopedia entry. Okay, maybe not so interesting when it seems that these game guides do not exist, but I think they're an interesting idea. See the example for Chess. Podkayne 15:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strategy

message: It seems that the game's gameplay section is waaay to detailed to be left like this. Game rules should serve to illustrate why the subject is of interest, and not be included simply for its own sake. I'll try to find some time and trim the article considerably. JudgeGregg (talk) 19:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite Gameplay as per [[WP:GAMEGUIDE]] 

message: "Accumulating a total of four treasures in their home base."
This is incorrect. You win if you have a total of 2 treasures that belong to other wizards on your home base. Dmpunks (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victory Conditions
Talk:National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial

message: Does anybody know if fire police officers are eligible for inclusion in this memorial? Search4Lancer 06:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire police?
Talk:Multiagency Coordination Systems

message: This is clearly copied, but is widespread on the internet. It appears to be from "the Incident Command System (ICS) National Traininng Curriculum documentation, October, 1994." I am unsure if this is under a free liscense or not, but I (or the reader) might look into it to be sure.--Esprit15d 20:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: copyright
Talk:Florence MacCarthy

message: There's mention of a £10,000 bond entered by Donal MacCarthy - is that correct?--shtove 20:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I had a good session on this one - hope I haven't distorted anything.--Shtove 23:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  War in Munster 

message: Just done a few tweaks on this - is it best to refer to him as Florence throughout, given so many references to other MacCarthys?--Shtove 23:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florence 

message: Where was the consensus for a name change from Florence McCarthy? Where was opinion even sought? Most sources in English refer to Florence. This is the English wiki, not the Gaelic wiki. Please  explain the change. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless I get a reply soon from  I'm going to revert the change. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: None. No. His name was anglicised as Florence, it wasn't his name. The text is not as Gaeilge, it is still almost entirely in English and respects sources in that language - save that it has given primacy to his actual name. The article generally refers to him by his surname to ease matters for Gallgeoirí. Apologies for the delay in reply. Fergananim (talk) 15:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we change it back? He is Florence McCarthy in most English language history books, including those printed in Ireland. Even Finghin is usually given as Finian. Otherwise Catherine the Great will have to be renamed Yekaterina Alekseyevna Romanova.78.17.33.95 (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: MOVED. Also,  was added to resulting redirect. --Hadal (talk) 17:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fínghin mac Donncha Mac Carthaig →  – This is the English-language wiki. The common name in the English language should take precedence over the Gaelic name. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 March 2023 

message: *Comment. Is there evidence that the English spelling is indeed more common than the Gaelic one per WP:COMMONNAME? 〜Festucalex • talk • contribs 16:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: If this move goes ahead the resulting redirect should be tagged with  noting that ga is the redirect language code for the Irish language. Andrewa (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Jeunesses Patriotes

message: Is this Pierre Tattinger the same guy who was the war-time Mayor of Paris, who is credited with saving Paris by convincing the Germans to leave? A recent book contends that this Taittinger (the one who was Mayor) also was a grand supporter of the French Resistance, allowing his winery's cellars to be used by them. --Habap 20:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that it is. --Habap 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pierre Charles Tattinger
Talk:Religious education in Romania

message: Although education was an area where churches registered success in the early stages of post-communist transition, religious education has remained understudied. 
<this last phrase is utterly confusing. What does it mean for religious education to be "understudied"? Not enough students in such classes? Or the problem has been insufficiently looked at (and, if so, by whose standards)?> quote Jmabel
:I meant to say not researched, not much taken until now in consideration for study, research, etc.  Bonaparte  talk 20:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Understudied refers to the fact that turnout for these classes is quite low - that is, in comparison to, say, commerce or law or engineering, theology is studied by quite a small number of students.  Ronline ✉ 09:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: As far as I know, the current structure is that religion is an optional, ungraded subject in both primary and secondary school. Students can opt out of studying religion - those that do study non-religious Ethics curricula, so it's not compulsory in primary schools (this would violate both freedom of religion provisions and Romanian secular legislation, since Romania has no national church). Religion is offered in all of the 15 denominations depending on demand.  Ronline ✉ 09:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current situation

message: This writing is wholly biased towards religion. Its nowhere near neutral, even claiming that a religion fully saved a country without proof. It is written as if manna was literally raining down on the country now, and seems to refuse any acknowledgement that there could have been other contributing factors. If someone with knowledge can fix it, that would be preferred; as it is now, it reads like an advertisement or a sermon. 74.128.56.194 (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolutely Non-Neutral POV
Talk:Daryll Cullinan

message: I won't revert a second time, though the article is woefully short as it stands. However, I will attempt to start discussion on the paragraph that has now been removed twice:
:The Herald Sun claimed he was the "batting bunny" of Shane Warne, and Cullinan has been dismissed four times by Warne, for a batting average of 2.75 whenever he was out to Warne. During one Test, Warne is said to have remarked that he'd been waiting two years for another chance to humilate Cullinan. Cullinan replied "Looks like you've spent it eating.".
I don't understand what is wrong with this; it's all verifiable (the second bit is, admittedly, an anecdote, as shown by a Letter to the Observer), but it is nevertheless true. If you feel the article focuses too much on Cullinan's failures against Warne, by all means write more on his career - but it is true, verifiable, and notable (Cricinfo mentions it in the second sentence of his short biography, for example).
If no reasonable argument for removing it has been provided within the next 24 hours, I'll put the content back. Sam Vimes 20:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See? Adding stuff works better than removing it. Now I'm perfectly happy (after adding some wikilinks, and the reference to the Herald Sun again - you might think it a nuisance, but unfortunately Wikipedia requires all opinion (such as "he was the bunny of Warne") to be cited with a source. Oh, and by the way, if you're the same guy as Dude X you might like to read Wikipedia:Sockpuppets - not accusing you of misusing accounts, but people will if you start voting for the same thing twice, for example, so just bear that in mind. If you're not, then just disregard the advice. Sam Vimes 10:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:German tanker Altmark

message: In the novel Men at Arms, by Evelyn Waugh, on page 155 in my edition, the Altmark is "... now dubbed 'the Hell Ship'. There were long accounts of the indignities and discomforts of the prisoners, officially designed to rouse indignation among a public quite indifferent to those trains of locked vans still rolling East and West from Poland and the Baltic."
Does anyone know if the imprisoned sailors were particularly badly treated (or was it just propaganda). Should this be mentioned in the article? Seminumerical 20:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page german-navy.de gives completely different specs (length 178,25 m), builder (Howaldtswerke AG Kiel) and slightly different fate after 1940 (departure for Japan on 09.09.1942, so it could not be able to use help of Soviet ice-breakers). Also the page  gives length of 582 ft (some 177 m) and 20,850 tons and confirms, that by March 1941 she was busy with Sharnhorst twins.  Pibwl �?« 23:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubts

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Geneva Frequency Plan of 1975

message: The Final Acts of the Regional Administrative LF/MF Broadcasting Conference (Regions 1 and 3) Geneva, 1975 (GE75) is the official (albeit longwinded) title of the document. It is often shortened to "GE75" or sinply "the Geneva Plan"
Would any of these not be a more suitable title for this article ?
:"The Geneva Plan" certainly seems more appropriate. When I first saw "Wave Plan of Geneva" I thought 'what on earth is that?'... By the way I moved your edits out of the deletion template.  Dsergeant 18:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have moved the article to Geneva Frequency Plan of 1975 – this is (apart from the "GE75" already mentioned) the "short" name by which the agreements are officially referred to by the European Broadcasting Union.  -- Picapica (talk) 14:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of Article
Talk:Robert Libman

message: Please add sources for the following statements:
"He opposed the Montreal merger, but then also opposed the demerger. Many Côte Saint-Luc residents attribute his opposition to the demerger to his newfound status within the Montreal City Council's Executive Committee and accused him of promoting his own self interest over the city's. On June 20, 2004 over 87% of Cote Saint-Luc ballots were cast for demerger, rejecting Libman's position. For more than a year after the demergers he declared he would run against Borough Councillor and demerger leader Anthony Housefather for Mayor of the new City of Cote Saint-Luc but when it became clear he would not win, he pulled out of the race and announced he was opening a consultant business."
--YUL89YYZ 21:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add sources for the following statements 

message: Which Montreal political party was he with?  Was it Union Montreal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.167.175 (talk) 14:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which municipal political party?
Talk:Golden West Financial

message: The entire "Business Model" section of this article appears to be original research.  See WP:OR for more info about what qualifies as original research.
I propose:
#that the "Business Model" section be deleted.
#that the remainder of the article be merged into Wachovia#Golden West Financial with citations.
I will proceed with these changes within two weeks, depending on any feedback or the addition of verifiable references.--JKeene 01:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed.--JKeene 00:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: Reopened the article due to current focus on Golden West Financial, and it's portfolio of 122$ billion worth of Adjustable Rate Mortgage as one of the reasons contributing to the 2008 US financial crisis and the collapse of Wachovia Bank. Hobartimus (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reopened 