Talk:Femtocell

message: The Interference section has a marvelously long and dreadfully disorganised second paragraph, with many "for examples" tangled amongst themselves, and a "primarily the only way to . . ." thrown in for syntactical diversion.  Would someone like to decode and translate at least the paragraph, if not the whole section?  Jim.henderson (talk) 05:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interference, for example 

message: The definition of Femtocell is very confusing here.  I found this definition to be clearer: http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid103_gci1284717,00.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmicdreams (talk • contribs) 18:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Term 

message: With the standardisation of femtocell system architecture published by 3GPP in April 2009, the different architectures described in this article are now irrelevant and out of date. They just add confusion to the (first time reader) and so I think should be removed. In its place, I'd expect to see a short summary of the 3GPP Iuh interface and SIP/IMS defined for 3G CDMA femtocells.
Mobilesense (talk) 12:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of alternative femtocell system architectures now out of date 

message: It seems to me the section on Interference is far too long and unbalanced with the rest of the article - surely references to the various studies/papers from a shortened section would be more appropriate instead.
Mobilesense (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interference section seems to be too long 

message: Reuters just reported a vulnerability in Verizon's femtocells: Researchers hack Verizon device, turn it into mobile spy station -- ScratchMonkey (talk) 21:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerabilities 

message: As an IT person who works for K-12 public schools in rural areas of the USA with fringe coverage, for a long time I have been trying to find options for how to improve cellular coverage inside the buildings. 
How do end-users like me obtain access to this equipment to install in the building? Is it something that I would be legally permitted to buy and install myself, hanging it off our existing Internet service, or does it instead need to be owned by a cell carrier in order to be properly licensed, checked against interference, and tied into the cellular call routing network?
Would I necessarily even need to pay for the equipment? Since it enables cell carriers to bill customers using equipment we are requesting be installed in our facilities, it appears we would be enabling their access to customer revenue otherwise unavailable to them, and as such we might manage to get paid for having the hardware installed to enable their revenue stream, or maybe just "a femtocell provider will install it and maintain it, but no cost to us".
I am aware of #NOTFORUM but these are all questions that probably should be discussed directly in the article anyway.
-- DMahalko (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple as that. Asked your carrier. Case closed. MrCellular (talk) 16:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your response is insufficiently concise. Who's "our" carrier? -- DMahalko (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

text:  what kind of question is that?! Good luck in getting better response... MrCellular (talk) 18:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do end-users obtain this hardware? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Femtocell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090804082632/http://www.femtoforum.org/femto/index.php?id=69 to http://www.femtoforum.org/femto/index.php?id=69
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090804082632/http://www.femtoforum.org/femto/index.php?id=69 to http://www.femtoforum.org/femto/index.php?id=69
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017165211/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/062409-vodafone-to-launch-3g-femtocell.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/062409-vodafone-to-launch-3g-femtocell.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified