Talk:PoxNora

message: Consider removing the rune lists to a separate page: "List of Runes (PoxNora)" or something.  Mylakovich 01:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  List of PoxNora Runes. Adam Weeden 12:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Sweet.  A list, separated by faction, would be sweet.  We could make some pretty big tables...should we separate by expansion? Mrobviousjosh (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've redirected List of PoxNora Runes here and in fact deleted that list per Wikipedia is not a game guide. Pascal.Tesson 21:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IF Wikipedia is not a game guide, why does Magic The Gathering have a page on Wikipedia entirely devoted to rules? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic:_The_Gathering_rules Mrobviousjosh (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: You're right, I don't know who put that there. :/  Surprised I didn't catch it last night- maybe it's new. Mrobviousjosh (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of PoxNora Runes

message: Does anyone know how to edit out those old ones and add in new ones? I am working on getting permissions from SOE-T at the moment to do so.
--Maponiak (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 

message: I want to use the faction symbols (found here: http://www.poxnora.com/index.do) for each faction in the factions section, but am still learning all the proper Wikipedia photo uploading/usage standards.  If anyone could help, I think that would be a great addition to the section for increased clarity and website reinforcement. Mrobviousjosh (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Site Images 

message: I'm going to ask PoxFan to please stop placing redundant information on the page. I'm willing to compromise and allow links to sites, as fan sites, however the lighthouse doesn't need its own little section.
One guild within a game does not belong on the wiki page. The wiki page is there to provide accurate, useful information regarding the game, not stroke the ego of certain players. If you want to harass us on the forums with that garbage, fine. But don't bring it here.
Gridlok87 (talk) 16:51, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Information 

message: Why not have a separate section talking about guilds in general?  This section could discuss how guilds exist within the game and their benefits.  And also let anyone add a tiny discussion about their guild in the "Guilds section".
I agree that there should not be a separate section for a single guild, otherwise many guilds will clutter this page with their entries.
Also there does not need to be any mention of any guild outside the separate guilds section of the poxnora wiki page.
Zumguy (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guilds Section 

message: I'm making this comment so that people think to go ahead and register their PoxNora username on Wikipedia, even if they have a different wikipedia page, so that they're not impersonated like Jimmie1982 just had happen to him.  That's all. Mrobviousj (talk) 00:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Usernames 

message: Any section on a specific guild from a game or a list of guilds is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Using multiple accounts to edit war is not allowed. Consider this a final warning, any account that reinserts the section without consensus will be blocked. BJTalk 19:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning 

message: I feel that this section is wrong and could be clarified.  I propose a change to:
*Faction - Example Themes
*Foglar Swamp - Water, Poison, Psychic
*Forsaken Wastes - Undead, Death Benefits
*Ironfist Stronghold - Earth, Equipment
*Shattered Peaks - Beasts, "Bats"
*Sundered Lands - Dragons, Sand
*Underdepths - Fire, Demons
The table format will stay the same I am just proposing a change to the contents.
Zumguy (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your thoughts BUT realize what you're asking- FS, FW, and IS for example don't have any subraces.  SP, SL, and UD include some.  I don't like that.  Adding equipment to IS is cool- I thought I added sand to SL already... Mrobviousjosh (talk) 21:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: It will be difficult to base the themes off of game tactics as there are so many different tactics that can be used.  Such themes will also not be readily apparent to a person just looking at the game and runes before they decide to buy into the game.  If we base the "themes" off of races, abilities, or other runes it will be easier for the potential player to notice them while browsing the game site.  For example it will be easy for the potential player to notice the "Tree theme" when looking at the Kthir Forest faction page and the kthir forest single rune store.  It might be difficult for them to notice a "Grimlic's Mirror Deck Theme" or a "Rush Theme" when looking at Kthir Forest on the website. -- Zumguy (talk) 22:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: We'd be quoting an awful lot instead of writing an article...*shrugs* Mrobviousjosh (talk) 01:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faction, Element Theme Table 

message: Since avatars, like shrines, are integral, unavoidable portions of the game, it makes sense they're in the game.  I'm wondering though if heroes, which represent the epitome of each faction, should be included.  I think it may open up a slippery slope though because people could then start lists about titans and whatever other big things come out.  Just looking for some feedback before I added that info.  Thanks. Mrobviousjosh (talk) 22:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heroes 

message: I was wondering if we should continue using the "Octopi, Inc. released" before certain expansions or not.  Since the game was created by Octopi up at the top and the change to SOE has been noted, I think this is unnecessary.  Also on the subject of Octopi, Inc., I was thinking of starting a page about the company but between trying to figure out the licensing of their actual logo and information about the company, with the small like 2-3 lines I found on the Pox website, I wasn't quite sure there was enough information to warrant a page about the company.  Perhaps some of the Octopi staff members would help??? Mrobviousjosh (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octopi, Inc.