Talk:Turion 64

message: I have removed this from the page:
*Turion is the name of a firegod as well.
Can anyone provide any more information, such as which mythology this is from? I can't find any source for this.  — PhilHibbs | talk 10:53, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because K8L = Turion, K9 = first generation dual-core , K10 = next generation AMD64 CPU with native Quadcore --Denniss 22:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Once more information is available reguarding the Turion X2, should there be a seperate article for it?  just as how there is a seperate article for the Athlon 64 X2 for the Athlon 64s, imo, there should be a seperate Turion 64 X2 article for the Turion 64.praetor_alpha 00:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this suggestion. -- ßίζ·קּ‼ (talk | contribs) 05:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I think not.  Turion is a brand name, not a technology.  If we treat it as a technology, we will be surprised by AMD's next use of the name.  Think, for example, how the names "Pentium" and "Celeron" have been used.  Surely "Turion X2" is an instance of "Turion". DHR 05:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, AMD wanted Turion to be analogous to Centrino, and that article is one article for the whole kit and kaboodle, including Centrino Duo. However, Turion also refers to a CPU, confusingly.  As such, I would think that the Turion X2, as a separate processor, deserves its own article. —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 15:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

text: How about we have a page, "Turion platform" and the good old "list of turion microprocessors". There is a lot of duplicate information. Futhermore, there are some mobile athlons and mobile semprons in the turion microprocessor list. 203.91.84.7 (talk) 02:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turion X2 Article? 

message: Please stop linking to amdboard.com.
* It does not display properly on Firefox 1.5. It was possibly only verified with and/or designed for Internet Explorer. In particular, a lot of text appears on top of other text in many places.
* The HTML is horribly malformed. The body tag isn't closed before a second body tag starts. And a second head section is found near the bottom.
Basically, this site is not well designed and many people could have trouble using it. It doesn't appear to be very informative either. Please try to find a better source of information. If you keep replacing the links to amdboard.com I will have to report you for vandalism. Imroy 17:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMDboard.com 

message: Thanks to the IP user who removed the automated WP:PLANTS banner. Just wanted to leave a note and let you know why it was placed on the page. Apparently, Talk:Turion was still a redirect. Turion is a botanical term and was intended to be tagged with the WikiProject banner, but when my bot, BotanyBot, encounters a redirect, it skips to that redirected page and places the banner there. Hence why this page got tagged. Sorry about that. I'll also place a note at the top of the Turion article to lead users to this page if they were intended to get here instead of the turion article. Cheers, --Rkitko (talk) 07:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:PLANTS]] banner mistake