Talk:Mathomatic

message: Should be made more accessible to newbies. I recommend StuRat and 11 for the job. 
                                                  My IP is not permanent. 202.79.62.14 01:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It took for me roughly 15 seconds to learn.  Audriusa 09:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would be nice if these are replaced by full terminology with appropriate links. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laplace, and Taylor 

message: The unreferenced tag was removed - let me explain why it was added - all articles need references to avoid Original Research and this article is no different.Thge lack of reference or sources leaves me wondering why the article is on wikipedia - it does not seem to be suitable notable. Reference to external sites would solve this problem but, as I don't know much about the subject, I am not the suitable person to add them. Perhaps someone else could? michael<span
 style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);"></span><span
 style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 102, 0);">Curtis </span><small
 style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> talk+ contributions</small> 15:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As this issue seems to be more about the notability of the software I have added the notability tag. Gesslein - possibly you could see to this and add some sources and references per WP:NOTE michael<span
 style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);"></span><span
 style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 102, 0);">Curtis </span><small
 style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> talk+ contributions</small> 15:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added many external links showing Mathomatic is included with many operating systems and has been ported several times by people other than me. Could you please remove the notability tag? -Gesslein 10:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding References

message: I am not sure that this software is remarkable or well-known enough to motivate an article. It appears to be a quite very simplistic and primitive software (OK, I admit that a CAS is not easy to make, but still...), developed by a single person. To be honest, I think that even my own software AlgoSim II is more relevant for an own article. --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, the application is so primitive that it can hardly be used at all: it does not support functions such as sin, arcsin, ln, sqrt, etc., and this is a extremely severe limitation, indeed. In fact, it appears only to be able to work with rational functions, compute sums of these and solve first and second order equations, more or less. This is not a usable CAS. I will add some tag to the page. --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 13:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, the article is written by the developer of the software... --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

text: I say let it be. The article is well-written and informative and is about a program available in many repos. Third party references are quite biased against highly technical topics so I'm willing to loosen normal notability under a common sense clause. Jason Quinn (talk) 02:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needed? 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (
1) the program is useful and free
2) the Wikipedia page is educational
3) the author has exceptional insights into algebraic computation.) --Kaday moik (talk) 03:59, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. I tried the program a few years ago, and at least then it was extremely primitive. If *this* software has its own Wikipedia article, then surely my own AlgoSim (www.algosim.se) should as well! --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Andreas, I have developed new insights and advanced algorithms for algebraic manipulation since then and Mathomatic has greatly improved over the recent years.  Try it again, you will be impressed.  The documentation is much better, too.  Won't you please try it again? -- George Gesslein II (talk) 12:36, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is not a directory of open source software. --Macrakis (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should not be speedy deleted because...  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mathomatic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140114032120/https://blenheimears.com/mathomatic/ to https://blenheimears.com/mathomatic/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)