Talk:Invisible College

message: Is there any upublished comment (ie, not original research) about the College Invisible and new tech - blogs, wikis and so on? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paul Murray (talk • contribs) 05:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Tech 

message: "The idea of an invisible college became influential in seventeenth century Europe, in particular, in the form of a network of savants or intellectuals exchanging ideas (by post, as it would have been understood at the time)." What does "by post, as it would have been understood at the time" mean. Does "it" refer to the post and, if so, is it meant to mean that there wasn't a postal service as we understand it today? Richerman (talk) 13:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one has answered this question and the paragraph goes on to say "One of the most common methods used to communicate was through marginalia, annotations written in personal copies of books that were loaned, given, or sold" I've removed the offending phrase. Richerman (talk) 23:48, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence 

message: Perhaps these are usable..
*"What is an Invisible College? An Invisible College is a group of peers, typically from different disciplines and with different viewpoints, who band together round a shared interest. So far, so echo chamberish?
The term was probably first used by Robert Boyle c. 1644. When his father died, Boyle inherited a bundle of land in Ireland and an estate in Dorset, and he was consequently sufficiently well-off to give up his to study and scientific research."
*"In 1660, within a few months of the restoration of Charles II, a group of twelve men, including Robert Boyle and Christopher Wren, met in London to set up a society to study the mechanisms of nature. At a time when superstition and magic governed reason, the repressive dogma of Christian belief silenced many, and were post-war loyalties ruined careers, these men forbade the discussion of religion and politics at their meetings. The Royal Society was born and with it modern, experimental science."
*"After noting that Robert Boyle coined the term Invisible College [p. 63.] and conceding that "It is unlikely that Boyle himself was ever a Freemason" he then posits the unsupported rhetorical question: "Was Boyle's Invisible College really an early lodge of Freemasons?" [p. 66.]"
*Invisible College Press
*Invsibile College at everything2
 
Thanks.  Eclipsed (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some quotations 

message: I have attempted to unpick the muddle on this topic by giving detailed references. Christopher Hill calls the various groups involved "interlocking", and clarity should be sought. There are indeed counter-arguments, to the effect that the early history of the Royal Society had the "pansophic" elements deliberately written out. But it looks as if historians no longer believe that the 1646-7 group Boyle mentioned is a major scientific one. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting

message: As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Royal Society a special photo session in the Royal Society Library in London has resulted in Commons:Category:Royal Society Library, with over 50 photos of their treasures, mostly 17th century manuscripts, including several of one of the early minute books, Boyle's notebooks etc, the manuscript fair copy of Newton's Principia etc. Please add these as appropriate. Thanks! Wiki at Royal Society John (talk) 22:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photos on Commons from the Royal Society Library 

message: The short description currently reads A precursor group to the Royal Society of London, consisting of a number of natural philosophers around Robert Boyle. This is at odds with the current article scope. Andrewa (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description