Talk:Myanmar Air Force

message: :Image:Airforce-flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Airforce-flag.jpg

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Myanmar g-4 super galeb.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Myanmar Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091228111709/http://mizzima.com/news/world/3200-russia-burma-sign-arms-deal.html to http://www.mizzima.com/news/world/3200-russia-burma-sign-arms-deal.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.elevenmyanmar.com/politics/12819
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.janes.com/article/76520/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Should we add the JF-17 fighter jet in, I am pretty sure a few were delivered to the Air Force before Pakistan suspended the order. Oscarm18 (talk) 02:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK, MAF had signed a deal for 16 JF-17 Block II, but no source indicated that JF 17 has been delivered to MAF yet. I have no objection if you can provide a citation that directly supports that JF 17 has been delivered. Phyo WP (message)  04:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Thanks we can check but you have not provided a reliable source for us to look at. MilborneOne (talk) 14:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  JF-17 

message: Myanmar Shenyang J-6 is out of service. It should be removed from the list. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source that says this?Nigel Ish (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shenyang J-6 

message: Is the  a verifiable published reference? Also please provide evidence relating to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, specifically what variables need to be entered to verify the claims? FDW777 (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that while SIPRI is verifiable (type in recipient, weapon type and a date range and that will give you a list) - it records deliveries and not actual holdings - i.e. it cannot be used to track how many of an item are still in service (and have not been lost, used or scrapped), or whether a weapons system has been withdrawn from use.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Your second point is probably in need of a wider discussion somewhere, since maintaining accurate information on articles with content such as this (of which there are many) seems to be next to impossible. FDW777 (talk) 11:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

text: I repeat the question that has yet to be answered, is the  a verifiable published reference? FDW777 (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Still waiting for an answer to the question. Unless evidence is provided, I will be removing it from all articles using it as a reference. FDW777 (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Very little information on the web to prove or disprove the reliability of the "Defence Services Historical Museum and Research Institute" but the fact that only the name of the institute is give with no further information on publication or source I would remove it. MilborneOne (talk) 16:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverifiable claims 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Myanmar Air Force's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "sipri1":
From Chilean Air Force: Trade Registers. Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 2015-02-18.
From Royal Australian Air Force: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 23 December 2017.
From Republic of Singapore Air Force: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 2015-02-18.
From Bangladesh Air Force: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved 23 December 2017
From Royal Thai Air Force: Trade Registers Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 2015-05-18.
From Cyprus Air Forces: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 14 December 2017.
From Mongolian Air Force: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 2012-12-18.
From Republic of China Air Force: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 2015-04-10
From Ecuadorian Air Force: 
From Korean People's Army Air and Anti-Air Force: Trade Registers. Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved on 29 May 2015
From Azerbaijani Air Forces: Trade Registers . Armstrade.sipri.org. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Myanmar Air Force]] 

message: Navigator. 4,3,2,1,Master
Signaler. 4,3,2,1,Master
Air Gunner. 4,3,2,1,Master
They are list over all NCO of MAF
They are dress uniform with WO1 rank but it is not star,with what and attach half wing on chest.
They are list between CO and NCO ,They are called Aviator 2001:44C8:4185:E68C:1:2:F78F:E166 (talk) 06:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Rank in Myanmar Airforcr