lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Holly Meowy

message: Holly King was born on August 20, 1977 not 1981 as referenced on California public records here Someone keeps changing it to 1981 Mystery6666 (talk) 07:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:OR doesn't allow you to use Primary sources in that way.Geni 20:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Does that mean that you can't use factual public records, but if someone were to write a subjective blog about it, then you could quote that? I'm curious.Mystery6666 (talk) 07:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Blogs tend to fail WP:RS.Geni 21:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But the link that you're using to justify Holly's incorrect age is a blog. How do you justify showing her age incorrectly even though you've seen proof that she's 31. I have a hard time believing that Wikipedia's rules were intended to discredit factual information in support of providing false information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mystery6666 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you have no idea if Holly King is actualy her birth name you don't have proof.Geni 11:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate Discrepancy 

message: Over half the article is an unreferenced summary of her appearance on MTV's Fear. WP:ENTERTAINER states "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions." I don't believe that requirement is met here. She has had no significant roles in any production outside of reality TV. So then it becomes a question of whether or not two == multiple. لennavecia 14:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight and questionable notability 

message: That can't be her actual surname. No, it has to have been a nickname, or something she arbitrarily added. At least her parents have to have arbitrarily named her that. Is it really true that she was "born" as Holly Michelle Meowy? I have my doubts. PseudoSkull (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meowy as an ACTUAL surname? 

message: I can see that there was previous discussion about Holly’s year of birth, but it cannot possibly be 1987. She was a contestant on Big Brother 5, which premiered in July 6, 2004. If she was truely born August 20, 1987 she would have only been 16 years old! This would be against the Big Brother casting rules here. Furthermore her IMDBPro page lists her birth year as 1977 here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.233.163.106 (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year
Talk:Weekend at Bernie's II

message: "While that at U.S. Virgin Islands two flunkies are forced by Mobu to leave vacation, go back home, get Bernie, and bring him back to life and take him to the U.S. Virgin Islands. Then at a restaurant Larry..." The whole thing is like that. Was it copied from some non-english google translation site? Someone needs to re-write it.207.237.208.153 (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing of the plot section is atrocious 
Talk:Igor Kipnis

message: Greetings -
Igor Kipnis is certainly one of the greatest names in harpsichordy. His dedication to both the instrument and the music of the harpsichord can be appreciated from the perspective of a lion taimer.
"The harpsichord is not unlike a wild cat, fornicating on a tin roof." - Igor Kipnis (1977)
While colourful, the reference is entirely correct, as most poeple find the modern piano to be a much more easthetic instrument and easier to handel sound!
The history of the harpsichord is fraught by many technical and artistic constraints.
MORE to FollOW!!! - unsigned.
Well, he certainly was one of the best known harpsichoridist of the 20th century, and did much to popularize the instrument, picking up where Wanda Landowska left off. But it looks like his article is a cut-and-paste-job from his obituary; we need an encyclopedia article, so it'll need some rather severe adjustment! - Nunh-huh 05:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fairly routine to include sons- and daughters-in-law as survivors in obituaries — see  — but this, of course, is not an obituary and I don't think we necessarily want to list "survivors" as such anyway. In a biographical article one might want to know that the subject had a son, and has living descendants, but I think you're right in saying there's a better way to do this. - Nunh-huh 11:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " He was survived by his son, film, record producer, and Kipnis Studio Standard creator Jeremy R. Kipnis, and his wife Carolina R. Kipnis" - Carolina is the son's wife, I presume - does one say that one is survived by one's daughter-in-law ? If she is not his child, should perhaps not mention this ...
195.59.147.60 (talk) 10:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fairly routine to include sons- and daughters-in-law as survivors in obituaries — see  — but this, of course, is not an obituary and I don't think we necessarily want to list "survivors" as such anyway. In a biographical article one might want to know that the subject had a son, and has living descendants, but I think you're right in saying there's a better way to do this. - Nunh-huh 11:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography - clarity and grammar
Talk:The Hamilton Spectator

message: dont' worry i'm from hamilton too, westdale in fact
went to dalewood with creator of this page (Joel)...he prob doesn't remember...gifty :P
zeChinaman 05:38, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not remember you? I remember everyone I meet! Except for those people I forget...but I don't remember them, so I don't know that I've forgotten them...wait a second...JoJaysius 21:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:6 Underground (song)

message: The article claims it has a Piano in the background - but I'm listening to the song right now, and the only thing that sounds like a piano has a very "plucked" sound, more akin to a Harp - or, perhaps someone directly plucking a Piano's strings? - but nothing that I would directly describe as a relying on a "Piano."  I hear guitars, bass and synth - but no piano. Traegorn 05:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is some kind of string instrument, probably a harp. Also, the Goldfinger soundtrack sample is of a harp, not a backbeat. (Specifically, it's from the scene where Bond discovers Goldfinger's first victim - you can hear the harp sample, although at a much slower tempo than in the Sneaker Pimps song). I've made the correction. Voodoo4936 00:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  I no longer feel like I'm going nuts. :P Traegorn 06:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Piano?

message: "...All though i belive it was mostly used in the trailer..."
What the? Oh no way..this has to go NOW!
Wickedxjade 01:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Opnions you dingbats!
Talk:The Namesake (film)

message: The article lists three languages for the film. What language was it FILMED in and would it not be prudent to list only that language (Dubs devalue the film, no film should ever be dubbed imo). 
It is distracting and of no research value to list dub languages releasers have butchered the film with for the uneducated people (who can't read) of that local. If it MUST be included it should be in a separate section titled localized DVD release and not in the information box which is about the PROPER release specifications. This article fails to inform people about such proper release information. Lostinlodos (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks; So many of the foreign film listings on Wikipedia include dubbed languages which the film was not filmed in; it creates confusion and dilutes the educational process when seeking information on films in order to purchase correct and proper versions (those in the original language). Lostinlodos (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Language? 

message: Is there a wikipedia position on spoilers?  In this case it isn't a huge distraction but the death of the father is one of the plot turning points.  --Kcrossle (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler?
Talk:Federal Reserve Police

message: Where is it determined that Federal Reserve Police are specifically authorized to fly while armed?  Under federal law it appears that ALL feds are authorized to fly while armed as they are authorized to "carry firearms."  For Federal Reserve Police it would seem that they must be on duty to do so?  66.30.56.50 (talk) 10:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm confused: It says it was formed in 2001, yet the only officer to die in the line of duty died in 1922. Was there some precursor to the FRP?
76.214.28.172 (talk) 21:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Like it says in the article, officers were sworn in on a state-by-state basis prior to 2001. The agency as a whole was only created then, but it existed in constituent parts before that date. ninety:one   21:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding Date 

message: According to forum threads such as , only the Federal Reserve Board Police is a federal LEA. Apokrif (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Federal Reserve Police a federal law enforcement agency?
Talk:Achintya Bheda-Abheda

message: The title of this article is incorrect.  The philosophy is called Achintya Bheda Abheda.  Bheda means different.  When an 'A' is added to the front, it becomes the opposite, or in the case the meaning is 'the same' or 'oneness'.  The term Achintya Bheda Bheda just means inconceivably different AND different...that isn't the philosophy this is discussing...Vidyapati dasa 05:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title error
Talk:Kin, Okinawa

message: Any Marines or Naval personnel stationed at Camp Hansen should contribute to this page.  It has been years since I was in Oki and I did what I could for this but quite frankly memory goes away.  Please add to this if you have been there, otherwise people will not know about the experience we have had there.  Thanks.
:Yeah, well, there's not really much to say about it, and even less that is verfiable through anything than the editor's memory... I've never sene any sort of article or website about this town. Bahamut0013 01:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For those at Camp Hansen 

message: I was stationed at Camp Hansen from September 1982 - September 1983 and again November 1984 - November 1985. I worked at Disbursing managing the pay for rotating Battalions along with 3rd Recon, Ammo Co, and 7th Comm. I loved Oki. I bought a car for $80.00 and drove it all over the island every weekend. Great Times!  17:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cam Hansen Disbo 
Talk:The Wood

message: Who was Lisa Ray Talking about 2601:155:3:4930:2420:2E63:618D:5773 (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thelma and Louise
Talk:Scottish National Liberation Army

message: The bulk of this article has no sources nor any way of verification. GeorgeLouis 06:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2090-2351365,00.html - To add to article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Weggie (talk • contribs) 12:43, 15 September 2006  (UTC)
Cleaned up the first sentance a bit. The rest of the page still reads like a PR piece though, and maybe this article and other articles pertaining to small terror groups should be folded into another article. -SteveG  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.12.100.241 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 15 September 2006  (UTC)
I liked this bit "which nearly blew up in one of her assistant's faces".
How many faces did her assistants have?
84.135.215.37 18:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The information on SSG should be expanded on and made into a separate article seeing as it is a separate organisation from SNLA - 92.23.145.129 (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make SSG a separate article
Talk:PM Magazine

message: This article is great....brings back many memories. Would it be okay if the hosts of the localized PM Magazine segments be listed with their respective stations/cities? --Bdj95 06:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hosts 

message: I was once on an episode of this show around 1984-6, and I would love to find it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eportress (talk • contribs) 02:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How  to find episodes? 

message: Who owns tapes of the shows? Local stations? Are clips or segments available for licensing or to researchers? Could it be that most local stations have erased their tapes and it's all been lost? What a shame if true. One way to look up a specific local show and time period or host would be, I suppose, to find an old issue of TV Guide, or pay somebody who has a TV Guide collection to do some research. 5Q5 (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clips from shows?
Talk:Train set

message: Trainset and Consist are rail transport nomenclatures referring to railroad trains pulled (0r pushed) by a locomotive (or multiples) and having any combination of or any quantity of rail cars; while the use of the caboose (other names) has been terminated, it remains the trailing image of the trainset.  Greetings, Paptilian (talk) 15:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trainsets 

message: Train sets are model railroad hobby packages usually including track, locomotive, one or more rail cars, and generally commemorate some aspect of rail transport. Greetings, Paptilian (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Train set
Talk:The Yes Men Fix the World

message: This page has the information about the 2003/2004 movie but is also the apparent page for the 2009 movie that follows a similar description made by the same people. All information (release, tagline, etc) was about the 2003 movie but with some the header saying The yes Men Fix the World so I removed the "Fix the World". If this is incorrect (if the 2009 movie is actually a re-release of the 2003 movie? It doesn't appear that it is) please reverse the changes right away 67.87.245.205 (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion between the two different Yes Men movies

message: This looks like the work of these folks. Anyone know for sure? (→Netscott) 00:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed! Oh man! (→Netscott) 00:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: haha. yes, definitely. That should be included int eh article. Alex Stacey (talk) 00:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: HUD impostor?

message: I'd be very interested to know who financed the film. Alex Stacey (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HBO funded or did they buy it after it was made? 

message: I think this should be added to the article, but I'm not sure if it's true or just another prank.--Ancient Anomaly (talk) 22:33, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  P2P release
Talk:You, Me and Dupree

message: This section obviously has no value. Delete? VarunRajendran (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration section

message: The reaction section is highly biased, especially considering it only quotes one positive review. The response otherwise was overwhelmingly negative, and the film acheived a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Thoughts?
I was going to bring up the lack of Rotten Tomatoes. Micheal Medved's reviews usually aren't taken too seriously amoung moviegoers.
How so?  I'm not a Medved fan, but I would assume conservative audience-goers would appreciate his "moralistic" approach to what movies to go see.--70.179.177.142 22:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction 

message: Wow, check out that letter. As if I need another reason to hate Steely Dan.  What a couple of douches.
I agree. The only "travesty" in this affair is the letter itself. A 10 year old could rip it to pieces.
:As opposed to any other piece of paper, which would take the strength of an eleven year old? While I agree that the song and the film have nothing in common, with the exception of the first few lines, there's no need to delve into insults. Oh, and be sure to sign your posts, which I'm sure a ten year old could do. --Agent Aquamarine 13:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steely Dan 

message: The Audrey Hepburn movie that appears in You, Me and Dupree is Roman Holiday. I was interested and so found out, and thought I would share. --Eleazar 22:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audrey Hepburn 

message: What is the criteria for linking? People (not sure if it's more than one) are continully coming in and linking the "naughty words" in this article, why? Is that what Wikipedia is all about, to snigger and snort like little kids, "Oh, look, I linked the word masturbation, hee hee!".
Pretty juvenile, perhaps that section should be locked?
65.120.75.6 16:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking 

message: Does anyone know the name of the song in the movie when Carl and Molly make up? I think it was also in a preview for "United 93."
4.156.48.248 22:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack Questions
Talk:False Dmitry II

message: Please see the discussion on the Talk:False Dmitriy I page.
Rejected not correctly formatted see Talk:False Dmitriy I for a fuller explanation. --Philip Baird Shearer 19:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move June 15

message: Does the phrase "false Dmitri" actually reflect Russian usage,  and if so,   what it is ?Eregli bob (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian usage
Talk:False Dmitry III

message: Please see the discussion on the Talk:False Dmitriy I page.
Rejected not correctly formatted see Talk:False Dmitriy I for a fuller explanation. --Philip Baird Shearer 19:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move June 15

message: — Assignment last updated by Soviethistorian (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History
Talk:Felix Laband

message: Sorry I butchered the article.  I tried to tone it down to NPOV but there is still more work to be done and more content to add.
06:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Larceny, Inc.

message: I got the information about Robinsons' role and the connection to Small Time Crooks from Robert Osborne's bookend segments on the Turner Classic Movies showing of this film, on the date mentioned. I consider this a reliable source, my only qualm was with how to format it. If anyone thinks my approach was less than ideal, feel free to change it, of course.--SB | T 06:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made it more clear what is being referenced. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert Osborne
Talk:Effigy

message: Some smart people decided to hang up effigy of Palin and Obama. Yeah. Someone might want to add that to the article. 74.140.222.56 (talk) 01:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

message: "An effigy is a representation of a specific person..."
Not in archaeology, where an effigy is considered (I think) to be any 3-D representation of a person, animal or plant (eg squash).  Usually these are ceramic, for examples see Nazca culture. This is the New World usage, at least, and it would be good if a professional chimed in. I'm pretty knowledgeable but hardly professional! 
We probably need a new article, as this one deals almost exclusively with Old World historical funerary effigies. Comments? TIA, --Pete Tillman (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt you are right there. Dictionaries? Johnbod (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede definition problem. New article needed for archaeological effigies?
Talk:Heartbrand

message: Can anyone explain WHY all the Heartbrand brand names differ? It's something I've often wondered, seeing the different names in Europe, Asia and Australia.
Please add this to the page if you know why.
:Brand loyalty. People recognise the names, as most of them are from old companies that Unilever purchased over the years. --Kiand 16:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Different Brands

message: What is the reason for this article, when it is fully included inside the Unilever article? Can't it be safely deleted? (Note to the user from IP 195.93.21.131 who deleted this entry: please answer instead of deleting other people's entries - that could be considered rude). --maf 16:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant?

message: The subject definitely justifies its own article. The Heartbrand design is one of the biggest candy brands in the world and the List article should more just merely list the names of different brands. There is no reason for omitting this topic from an article. @IAmChaos  15:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objections to a new draft. It looks like I never had anything to do with the article, so go right ahead. . Happy Editing--IAmChaos 16:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I mentioned you by accident. sorry for disturbing you. (kind of embarassing). UnkreativeFrog (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Dont be embarrassed, I havent been around much so I'm happy to have an excuse to look into something. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 21:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resplitting
Talk:Invoicing bureau

message: Someone set this page as a redirect to "invoice" - this page has nothing to do with an invoice.  If textual description is inappropriate, then it should probably be redirected to "accounts receivable".  But this is a term that is not used in any context other than by a single American mass-media publisher.  Its use as a proper noun is appropriate and should stand on its own.
Reswobslc 07:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is precisely that it is used by just a single company. Since no one else uses this name, the name isn't notable, and so people on wikipedia won't go searching for it (unless they happen to work for Hearst and can't find the information there through the usual channels). A redirect seems appropriate (if not deletion). Do you have a different argument?--Chaser T 07:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, the company itself is obviously notable, but a non-unique bureau within the company is not. Lots of company's have departments that handle invoicing.--Chaser T 07:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: No, you're beginning to persuade me. But we do have standards for this sort of thing. Has anybody wroten this up in a newspaper or other reputable source? If not it might qualify as original research, which means that it's just your thoughts about it being a scam.--Chaser T 07:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, you seem to have signed off. I'll change it to a redirect for now. Just leave a message here if you want. I have the page on my watchlist and will see if you leave a message here.--Chaser T 07:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I really doubt it. I'd suggest you read some of our policies, particularly on verifiability and original research. I just don't see how this can ever be an encyclopedia article unless someone has written about this phenomenon somewhere that the reader can verify it. Sorry.--Chaser T 08:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)