lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Buccaneer 18

message: As it was before I edited it, the article reads more like a marketing effort than an encyclopedia entry.  
* No need to say planing in it is exhilarating
* 500 lbs is not particularly light for two man dinghy.  For comparison, the Fireball less than half as heavy, capable of being transported on a car roof rack and launched on a dolly.
* "self-rescuing" is not really a feature of note in a dinghy.  I'm not aware of any dinghy that can't be righted by the crew after capsizing.
* I'm not sure that this is the place to give Portsmouth Yardstick comparisons, but I left the section for now.  This section needs to be put in a better format if it is kept.Paulgush 22:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your comments here, made more than 14 years ago. The article was written a "breathless fanboi" tone, with no refs and full of spammy, promotional language. I have re-written it from scratch to address all these issues, retaining just the images, which, by the way have all been renamed and reorganized on Commons.  - Ahunt (talk) 18:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of Article

message: For a boat being talked about as a day-sailer, the Portsmouth Yardstick numbers are really a pretty technical racing aspect.  If it is going to be kept in the page, a link should be made to the wiki page for the Yardstick explanation. AdmiralKit 12:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portsmouth Comparisons 
Talk:Rings (2005 film)

message: If somehow they played the tape on national TV or something, would not it be like a mass murder? --Bukhrin 19:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's one of the DVD extras on the unrated version of "The Ring Two"  -- EmiOfBrie 07:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a thought

message: A covershot would be nice. 76.66.193.90 (talk) 09:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD cover
Talk:The Ring Virus

message: "Both videotapes feature a message at the beginning along the lines of "Watch until the end, you will be eaten by the lost..."" - I read the book and as I remember, this line wasn't in the video.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.5.15.95 (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug? 

message: Does any one think we should put in a plot?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitual aelita (talk • contribs) 09:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Ju-On: The Grudge

message: Can anyone expand this article? Maybe with a poster/dvd cover for a start, and maybe some more indepth writings of the storyline, characters and time line of the film (as it jumps around a fair bit). I think if the american remake has such an indepth page, this should too.
I've only seen it once, so it'd be cool if someone could do it. Beast Love
**I guess I'll do it then when I've got the time and have watched it again. And when I read up on image usage for the poster Beast Love 19:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  expansion 

message: I think Rotten Tomatoes has mixed the pages of Ju-On: The Curse () and Ju-On: The Grudge (). It doesn't make sense that a direct-to-video movie gets more reviews than a theatrically released movie, and if you look at the review dates and actually read some of the reviews (), it's clear that there's been a mistake. --Mika1h (talk) 20:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotten Tomatoes
Talk:Ju-On: The Grudge 2

message: Should someone mention the Ju-On: The Grudge 2 manga in this article? The Ju-On: The Curse article mentions a manga adaptation and I personally have both, so I think it should be mentioned, but I won't do anything unless someone else thinks it's alright.--Sherwood-Nightshade 21:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga? 

message: These maps displayed militarily vital topics, including the white 2601:207:100:7FF0:21AE:67EC:C784:369A (talk) 05:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the 

message: two homogeneous and antagonistic groups, "the pure people" 2601:207:100:7FF0:21AE:67EC:C784:369A (talk) 05:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  nationalism, preferring instead the term "nativism": a xenophobic
Talk:Causation (law)

message: causation in common sense
Should proximate cause be merged with this? Or at least more explicitly linked? Amcfreely 19:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was just reading this and found a few American references. I'm just wondering if this article is primarily for English (UK) law or is it American? Shamess 14:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just English law? 

message: Same systems of law and they are similar enough... Foofighter20x (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the presumption that both pages will expand and each country needs its own treatment, I'm taking the merger tag down. We need country specific pages and this as a comparative page. Wikidea 00:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: This rather opaque and difficult-to-follow article reminds me of one of the major problems with English law, which is that it failed to follow American law into the Plain English movement of the 1970s.  Most well-trained American practitioners today are drilled ruthlessly in law school in the principles of clear legal writing developed by famous scholars such as David Mellinkoff and Bryan Garner, and this is reflected in the clear style seen in the latest decisions from famous appellate courts like the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States.  It also helps that the U.S. has had many gifted, brilliant writers for judges like Roger Traynor and Benjamin Cardozo.  
Of course, it's true that causation by definition is an extremely abstract and difficult-to-explain concept, but wandering in and out of very abstract hypotheticals (which should be generally avoided in articles targeted for laypeople) doesn't help.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Blah. Read some Lord Denning judgments. Wikidea 00:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have.  A few were good, most were not.  I always thought Denning was overrated.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 02:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather opaque, what a mess 

message: See Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2016 June 4 -- PBS (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable Copyright violations in this text
Talk:Kvinesdal

message: The locations of adjacent municipalities can't be right. I'll have to come sort it out later.  Williamborg 03:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

message: corrections made Williamborg 03:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  corrections made  
Talk:Aaron of Lincoln

message: :The house of Aaron of Lincoln still stands, and is probably the oldest private stone dwelling in England the date of which can be fixed with precision (before 1186). It is on the right-hand side of the Steep Hill of Lincoln, on the way up toward the cathedral, and is figured in Jacobs, l.c., opposite p. 91, and in Tr. Jew. Hist. Soc. Eng., iii., opposite p. 181 (where accurate details are given). Originally the house had no windows on the ground floor—an omission probably intended to increase the facilities for protection or defense.
This was true in 1906, but is it still true today? Does the house still exist? --FeanorStar7 03:23, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, see Norman House.  Cool, huh? --Goodoldpolonius2 03:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: House
Talk:Rolla, Missouri

message: There's a serious problem here with the demographics.  There's no way in hell there's 89% asian people in Rolla.  I live here, and it's closer to 89% white.  Somebody goofed on the statistics.
4.6% Asian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.120.136.42 (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Neither of the Hockey Hall of Fame references for Wayne or Gary Dillon establish how they are associated with Rolla. I don't find either of them on the List of Missouri University of Science and Technology alumni at all. Does anyone have a better reference? Or is this an error? --papageno (talk) 03:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can’t find anything either, and since nobody hasn spoke up I’ve removed them. Grey Wanderer (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people - Dillon brothers - references don't establish connection to Rolla 

message: I hear the old Phelps County Jail was a favorite hang out for "The Man in the Iron Mask".  Cozy.Ealtram (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun places 

message: No mention of this place not the grocery store that was across the street. Was a piece of history in rolla. I actually spread material for the factory to make lingerie and ship somewhere. Just curious? Maybe it was called something else? I’m sure the factory and grocery store is tore down by now. 71.223.78.179 (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barad factory
Talk:Koumbi Saleh

message: What should at least be explained is if the city still exists today. --Asdirk (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It already says in the article that the city was abandoned, then rediscovered as an archaeological site. Warofdreams talk 12:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Today? 

message: I've reverted the addition of this sentence : "It was once thought that Koumbi Saleh had strong influence from the Maghreb, however archaeologists  have determined and now agree that it was in fact a product of the Mandé peoples, more specifically the Soninke branch who had constructed the site." No citation was given.  Which archaeologists?  Since when have they agreed?  How do we know this given that there is no surviving written information? Aa77zz (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do archaeologists agree? 
Talk:Disorganized offender

message: Is this the same as the "disorganized" offender first described by Roy Hazelwood?  Joyous | Talk 03:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this article mainly focused on the book "The Evil That Men Do" and that author's perspective and less of an overview of the offender type? -- Bellamila13 (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Ste. Rose (electoral district)

message: Does this page need to be moved to Ste. Rose (electoral division) or Sainte Rose (electoral division) or either with some other qualification?  :Category:Manitoba provincial electoral divisions shows a wide variety of forms.  -Acjelen 03:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to "what links here", there are no unrelated articles connecting to this page.  I'm not certain that a qualification or disambiguation would be necessary under the circumstances.  CJCurrie 19:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article there is a Ste. Rose, Manitoba in the riding, different from the similar Sainte Rose du Lac, Manitoba.  Links Winnipeg and Flin Flon are redirects to Winnipeg, Manitoba and Flin Flon, Manitoba respectively.  In my opinion Ste. Rose should redirect to Saint Rose or more likely Saint Rose (disambiguation), a needed disambiguation page for Saint Rose of Viterbo, Rose of Lima, College of Saint Rose, Sainte Rose du Lac, Manitoba, etc. -Acjelen 19:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Char Siu Bao

message: hahaha to be continued... wow... so where are those pics... if u dont I will, just came back from the market in Orlando, Florida and I have tons of sweet buns (I might eat them before I post picture though), merge this into Cha_Siu_Baau - it has more info. --x1987x 03:55, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Category talk:Amateur radio people

message: This category will soon be deprecated. Please see talk Category talk:Amateur Radio Operator —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kd4ttc (talk • contribs) .
:Probably not.  Further discussion at the above page came to an understanding that separate categories are used for grouping Wikipedians and Articles.  This category is being used for the later.  To this date, I still don't like the name of the category but I haven't heard anything better. --StuffOfInterest 18:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deprecated

message: I've noticed that in several articles about hams, their callsigns are not given. Is there a reason for this, or is this just an oversight? N0YKG 17:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the reasons that some wanted the category deleted was because it was not sourced or not verifiable.  If a callsign is included then it usually can be verified.  --jmb 09:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are callsigns not listed? 

message: I'm curious as to why this is named "Amateur radio people", which suggests it might include (if there are such things) performers on amateur radio as well as...um...do they still call them radio hams? Deb 17:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By the defininition (or more precisely regulation) of Amateur radio, anyone "performing" on it will likely loose their license.  The category is for those people who are involved in Amateur radio in some way.  I've never liked the name for this category but it does correctly represent its purpose at this time. --StuffOfInterest 17:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that! Deb 19:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: People?

message: Why is Steve Wozniak a subcategory?  It looks as if someone might have edited a page incorrectly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jmb (talk • contribs) .
:Good catch!  I've moved the reference from the category to the article. --StuffOfInterest 16:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry thought I had signed it!   --jmb 21:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve Wozniak

message: Why isn't Joe Taylor on the list? I'd add him but I can't see the code. I'd say a Nobel winner was important enough to be listed. - VK4TU  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.27.157 (talk) 03:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: K1JT
Talk:Kutsinhira Cultural Arts Center

message: We need to find a bigger logo image.  It would look better. --Roosmacfan 04:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 
Talk:Cathy Rigby

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Cypria

message: Deleted the link **Proklos' summary of the Epic Cycle translated by Gregory Nagy
Could not retrieve it from internet archives
:Corrected and reinstated on 28 September, but I forgot to mention that here at that time. Oops. Petrouchka 02:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as nom 22:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The change in the assessment of Cypria, exhibited in Aristotle and then influenced by Aristotle's example, was a Hellenistic downgrading. I can't enter this in the article because it will be challenged as "original research" and I have no standard history of Greek literature here. Anyone interested in this point?  The present passive of non-attribution makes no distinctions and contains little information. --Wetman 19:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Cypria was considered to be a lesser work"

message: The newly expanded article reads very well to me. I just want to raise one minor problem: the detail in footnote 1 actually doesn't support any dating of the fixed text of Cypria as known in classical times -- because (as the article goes on to say, and as I would agree) the main stories were in all likelihood fixed (part of a Faktkanon maybe) earlier than the text. Thus the Judgement of Paris could quite well have been painted before the text as known in classical times was fixed. Andrew Dalby 16:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions of 8/2/2007

message: Note 1 is used to support the statement of the date the composition of Cypria is placed at. The link in this note is now broken. As it is a fairly important point, and also considering the fact that this note is repeated as a reference in the Literature section of Cyprus, could someone please update the link with a working one or replace the note with a proper literature citation? AstarothCY (talk) 10:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chigi vase reference

message: I added the following caveat: "What follows embeds reports of known content of the Cypria in a retelling of the known events leading up to the anger of Achilles.".
A better approach would be to report the episodes that are actually known to have been in the Cypria. The fully-detailed lead-up to the Trojan War is reported elsewhere.--Wetman (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:Bandai Museum

message: Formatting and wording may be needed to make the entry sound more encyclopedic. If someone can go over this, it would be appreciated. -- Akosygin 04:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording and Formatting Clean-Up
Template talk:Self-reference cleanup

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Template:Self-reference. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#Template:Self-reference until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Self-reference" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Zingerman's

message: This article reads like an advertisement  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.238.212 (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: heh, naughty naughty. I won't do your work for you =p. but yeah, it's a good restaurant. __earth (Talk) 12:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Appearance in food review pages is not, in itself, conferring of natability. Regarding anonymous comment that "Zingerman's in my opinion is the best Deli in the world...." Unfortuanetly, this is an encyclopaedia and your opinion is worthless, at least until you have visited every deli in the world, and even then.... Emeraude (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:RAAF Base Edinburgh

message: I removed the plug for WikiProject Adelaide - it is more important that it is standardised with other RAAF articles than Adelaide articles. Justinbrett 02:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:ADEL has a legitimate interest in improving this article.--cj | talk 19:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Adelaide

message: There was no reference and the Unit has since relocated anyway AJAussie (talk) 05:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 102 Coral Bty from occupants
Talk:Auto-Tune

message: : I assume you have a subscription to oxfordmusiconline? Can you please provide here a quote from the section that talks about Quavo? GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  oxfordmusiconline 

message: : I don't use that. Nitesh Surya Vanapalli (talk) 13:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bolches yarboclos atte PAOK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:1016:6:5110:ACB0:DAF0:714F:92EA (talk) 23:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to /* oxfordmusiconline */  

message: There are a few points in this article that I think need to be changed. First, the article claims that Mirwais Ahmadzai created the first song to utilize auto-tune on the complete vocals, but the sources listed do not support this claim, and I was unable to find any other sources that supported this claim (except for the artist himself). I am going to remove this line and the sources cited. Here are the sources in case they can be used in any other ways: "Interview with Mirwais". www.geocities.ws. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304061705/http://www.geocities.ws/madonnamax/interviews/mirwais.html Retrieved 8 August 2017.
 "Comment Auto-Tune a tué les fausses notes". 3 September 2011. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017.  https://web.archive.org/web/20170620030011/http://next.liberation.fr/musique/2011/09/03/comment-auto-tune-a-tue-les-fausses-notes_757750 Retrieved 8 August 2017.
--Fgorm1 (talk) 23:39, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naive Song Claims 

message: I noticed that there is one instance of opinionated language in the article in the positive reception section. The line calls auto-tune a "crutch for poor vocals" and then states that that was the intended use of auto-tune. I am re-wording the line to be less opinionated.
--Fgorm1 (talk) 23:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Opinionated Language 

message: It seems the year of invention for Auto-Tune has been cited incorrectly as 1957, which is about 40 years off... Hildebrand only invented it in 1997. I've now corrected the errors by replacing them with the correct years.
Beldarius (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Year
Talk:Fort de Chartres

message: I nominated it as a good article, but I was wondering if this would better be called Fort de Chartres State Historical Site or Fort de Chartres, Illinois. Also might fix the first sentence to be better in context. —Rob (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I prefer the current name. Because the fort is not a town, adding "Illinois" doesn't seem exactly right. As for "state historical site," that is the current identification, but the fort, of course, wasn't that for most of its history. The name as it is seems to be the most common identifier, so it seems appropriate. -- DavidH 14:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move? 

message: I do not believe this article satisfies the good article criteria and will be delisting it if the concerns are not addressed in a timely manner.
Specifically:
Criteria 2b: "the citation of its sources is essential, and while the use of inline citations is not mandatory, it is highly desirable, in particular for longer articles. Unambiguous citations of reliable sources are necessary for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged.[1] Articles whose topics fall under the guideline on scientific citations should adhere to the guideline."
*I do not believe the the website of the 42nd Royal Highlanders, Inc., of Lafayette, Indiana qualifies as a reliablie source simply by being in possesion of the fort hundreds of years ago. *Added note: Another source is a dead link as well.A mcmurray 04:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisting

message: moved it to intext, I found the site to be reliable and consistent with other sources, as well as having information of a unique character (That of the British sent to occupy the fort). All of the "more scholarly" information I would have access to is from the perspective of the later settlers there and the French. PreciousRoi (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 42nd Royal Highlanders

message: I think this is a little better than a "start"-class at the present time, and have recategorized it under WikiProject Illinois. I also enlarged a couple of the pictures...which look fine at 1200x1600, but if they look goofy under lower-res 4:3 change them back.PreciousRoi (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class