Talk:The Cremaster Cycle

message: I've added a few screenshots to the article. They are all taken from the Cremaster 3 DVD. I am aware that the 'copyrighted screenshot category' specifies that there only be one of these images per article, but I believe that since there are 5 movies discussed within this article, it is still fair use to have more than displayed. Worst case, we can split up the cycle article into the different sections, keep the images and it would become an incentive to add information to the various sections of the cycle. -- Blahm 15:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These films were released in a 'random', non-sequential order. I imagine that it would be prudent to list them in the initial release order rather than the current sequential order. --Thaddius 05:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Where on earth did the money come from to produce this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.157.89 (talk) 00:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lingering question 

message: Why is this a part of the Latter-Day Saints project? What's the connection? 66.207.206.210 (talk) 19:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently Cremaster 2 (1999) mentions the Mormons.  I don't know if that means it needs to be in that project or not.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Acutally I don't think it dose, so I'm removing it.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 20:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mormons? 

message: The explanations of each film in the series are directly copied from , the official page for the Cremaster series. I will be deleting them shortly... normally i would fix as opposed to just deleting, but this is alot an did I not have time to re-write 5 sections. --Found5dollar (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violations 

message: I've removed the following paragraph:
:Beside other Artists Matthew Barney pays references to Johnny de Brest's dark Photo-Novel "Vladracul" (1991–1996). The Washington City Paper noted: Some of the man-monster creatures recall the films of Matthew Barney, and the lurid local-color details—Mina Harker gets gang-raped at Marlene Dietrich’s grave—suggest a concept album that David Bowie never got around to making during his Berlin phase. (A soundtrack of late-’70s Bowie, Iggy, and Eno would be apt.)The Washington City Paper (Mark Jenkins): Vladracul.
The initial sentence implies that Matthew Barney references "Vladracul". However, the quote (in context) merely states that "Vladracul" reminded the reviewer of Barney's work; the subsequent references to Mina, Marlene, Bowie, et al all refer to "Vladracul" and not to Cremaster, so are gratuitous in this article. This certainly does not demonstrate influence on Barney, and does not seem to demonstrate Barney's influence on de Brest either. Phil wink (talk) 23:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed confused reference 

message: The whole explication of the work is unreferenced. Shouldn’t it be? Otherwise is it original research? Eicatss (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs references?