Talk:Cover (philately)

message: I disagree with downgrading this from a start-class to a stub. A stub is a short article of a few sentences or maybe one or two paragraphs, while this is significantly better than that with quite a bit of information already. Stamp tongs is a stub but this is not. ww2censor (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve done an edit of the article and now placed project to start. StampOnIt (talk) 08:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment reduction

message: Since this article is about collecting, it would benefit from an additional section briefly summarizing the history of cover collecting. At the moment it only defines the subject without giving much idea about how the field developed. Also, I think a gallery of the different types of covers that are popularly collected would be a good idea; I'd be happy to scan and add some from my own collection.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tulliux (talk • contribs) 16:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of cover collecting 

message: A philatelic cover is an envelope but certainly not a postcard (A postcard made for philately is a philatelic postcard). See also pages and their distinct definition: Postcard and Cover (philately).Arno-nl (talk) 19:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A philatelic cover is an envelope or post card - wrong definition 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cover (philately). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723080537/http://www.stamps.net/posthist.htm to http://www.stamps.net/posthist.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Because of all the fanfare surrounding the Zeppelins most of mail carried aboard were Zeppelin first flight covers.Much of the funding for the Zeppelin delivery system was generated by collectors and other enthusiasts of the period. Because of the fast mail delivery service there was a lot of commercial mail aboard these vessels." Now what? --Anvilaquarius (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've no idea what you are trying to say but this article is not about Zeppelin mail but about covers in general. Are you suggesting a specific edit for the appropriate article or what? ww2censor (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. Most mail on the Zeppelin where first flight covers. 2. A lot of commercial mail was on these vessels. Now what? Was Zeppelin mail about collectors or about being quick and hence commercially viable? --Anvilaquarius (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  So what has your unsupported unverified statement got to do with this article? ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory 

message: Have a look at where this talk page is redirected? Talk:Philatelic cover 2A02:AA1:1615:BCF4:B55F:F825:4AE9:BA0F (talk) 22:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You could actually have fixed this! ww2censor (talk) 23:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirection?