Talk:Life Underground

message: GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
1:
*Article does not contain a lead section (or, conversely, has too large a lead section) or the Wikipedia-standard hierarchical structure.  Article needs to be organized into appropriately titled sections.  See WP:LAYOUT and content suggestions below.
*Infobox should contain an image,
*Peacock and weasel words, e.g. “whimsical”, “some of the individual pieces”, etc.
*In-line citations should come after closest succeeding punctuation mark.
*Grammar issues including, among others, inappropriate use of commas, e.g. “in various situations, and additional abstract”, incomplete sentences, not starting a sentence with a capital letter, not using commas to offset certain clauses, etc.
3:
*At a minimum, background should be provided on the Arts for Transit Program, 14th Street–Eighth Avenue New York City Subway station and Tom Otterness.
* Article content is largely symbolism and media reaction; expansion is needed in other areas present.  Additionally, at a minimum, article should discuss how Otterness was chosen (we aren’t even told the year of its commission), his inspiration for the work as a whole (inspiration for money bags is discussed), creation process, reaction of general public and phase-out (if existent).  (The quote “one of the most popular artworks in the subway system” is not sufficient public sentiment; we do not know about “competing” subway artwork; it would easily be the most popular if the only other art is advertisements.)
*Superfluous information, e.g. NYT “2003 account” contributes nothing to the article.
4:
*Article does not adequately discuss criticism.  Description of the work as "too cute" seems to be a backhanded compliment.  Is anyone bothered that funding was diverted for this?  Does anyone think it’s ugly or intrusive (article implies ca. 100 pieces are present in one station)?
*Article’s treatment of the subject is approbatory.  A neutral tone/quote selection is required.
General:
*Article content is minimal, disorganized and of questionable neutrality.  Significant work is required.  Please let me know if elaboration or assistance is needed. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 01:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA assessment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Life Underground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061231192635/http://www.steelcase.com:80/Files/bf4b22923c544b70813e8338a80ba0f1(2).pdf to http://www.steelcase.com/Files/bf4b22923c544b70813e8338a80ba0f1(2).pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Life Underground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080821220008/http://chelseanow.com/cn_55/marlborrough.html to http://www.chelseanow.com/cn_55/marlborrough.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Life Underground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.steelcase.com/Files/bf4b22923c544b70813e8338a80ba0f1%282%29.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724110831/http://tomotterness.net/pdf/news_artinfo_200610.pdf to http://tomotterness.net/pdf/news_artinfo_200610.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified