lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:67 (number)

message: I removed this item
*The team number for the Heroes of Tomorrow (H.O.T.) Team in the FIRST Robotics Competition.
because it's ephemeral. See WP:NUM#Numbers in sports. Plus, if you follow the link to the FIRST wiki, you'll see that the article on Team 67 is currently undergoing a neutrality dispute. Anton Mravcek 15:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Team 67 item removal 

message: Are these questions are TRUE or FALSE
 1. 71 the 16th prime number.
  A TRUE 
  B False
 2. 9 is a prime number.
  A TRUE
  B FALSE
 3. There is 67 counteis in Florida.
 A TRUE
 B FALSE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.168.5 (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lilly's Questions of the day!! 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bingo names -
Talk:68 (number)

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bingo names -
Talk:76 (number)

message: 17
The number of years that Pluto was recognized as a planet?
-- Mik 17:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bingo names -

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg for a centralized discusion as to whether Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg should be included in these pages. Certes (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg
Talk:93 (number)

message: i living in Kabul Afghanistan 154.59.43.237 (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  My century is Afghanistan
Talk:94 (number)

message: Is this really necessary? "the only number, greater than 1, that equals the sum of the squares of the digits of their own square in base 11. [citation needed]" Qwerfjkl talk 21:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  I've removed it. Certes (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important?
Talk:95 (number)

message: EVERYTINE I WANT TO EDIT, THE AUTOMATED FILTER APPEARS AND PREVENTS MY EDIT TO BE SAVED! 2800:E2:407F:FEA2:A8B5:D3D8:2455:53C1 (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT THE HELL IS HAPPENING IN TYIS PAGE 

message: I want to edit but a automated filter interrupts me! Juanecio0907 (talk) 10:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The filter aims to stop vandals from removing or changing the lead sentence of number articles.  Unfortunately, the text you were trying to remove happens to contain a phrase which often appears in the lead, causing a false positive.  I have removed the film trivia, as it is already duplicated later in the section.  Thank you for trying to do this yourself.  This filter only applies to new editors, so I hope it won't trouble you again.  Certes (talk) 12:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the "other fields" section? 

message: lighting McQueen uses 95 as his number ChaseTOM4YT (talk) 23:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kachow
Talk:97 (number)

message: It seems to me that 97 is the 11th term of the the Mian–Chowla sequence, not the 10th.
--Roberto.zanasi 08:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mian–Chowla sequence. 

message: This page seems to show a US-centric bias  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:DC08:9000:EDB5:B669:920:5B19 (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly you're right.  The N (number) pages have attracted a lot of trivia, and in this case it comes from editors with a U.S. interest.  I've removed some number factoids from similar articles.  I hope that one day we will get around to refining the inclusion criteria and have a general prune of items that don't belong. Certes (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States Bias
Talk:99 (number)

message: Sorry, sir, but I have only (limited) library time because of issues you cannot fully perceive.  If you would put any discussion addressing the issues with this article here, that is my preference, but we have two other natural obvious choices and others.  Your call.Julzes (talk) 00:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no credible reason for including your addition.  This is not an admin action, merely removing extreme trivia.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 07:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That appears overly assertive.  So, will undo.  Other opinions, please.Julzes (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if you can come up with a reason for inclusion, per WP:BRD, it should remain out until consensus for inclusion is established.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

text: I wish to comment.  Another admin and I have been brought into heightened conflict by this decision on your part in my opinion, this being somebody who has been of great assistance to me (but with whom a conflict was already brewing, apparently).  I don't know.  So sue me.  I think you have a more personal issue, Professor.  I will post here a best 3-hour editing effort tomorrow, if possible.  But I am already in dubious territory time-wise on various fronts.Julzes (talk) 00:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits have been dubious for some time.  Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Please look at WP:WikiProject Numbers to see the guidelines on what should be included in number articles.  The last 21 digits of 9999 having a lot of "9"s seems not to be the requirements.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 01:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

text: If you want to submit it to ko.wikipedia, you're welcome to.  Their standards may be different than ours.  But, even if the result is published, it still would be trivial.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admin revert undone
Talk:103 (number)

message: How come Arthur Rubin was given free rein to remove content which he does not understand taking into consideration that such material lies outside the fields of comprehension and expertise of his persona? MagnetElectro (talk) 10:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) Arthur Rubin offered a flawed reasoning in the description for his editing gymnastics here! So I reverted his editing.  MagnetElectro (talk) 10:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

text: (2) Arthur Rubin interfered with the category of Religion under the pretense that the reasoning behind my entry escapes his comprehension of the significance thereof! He should obviously stick to the fields of his expertise (i.e. Science & Math) and leave the other categories (i.e. Religion) to his colleagues rather than his own subjective irrelevant attitude! MagnetElectro (talk) 10:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim ibrahim. Ibrahim's books are fringe and self-published, one of the names of the "publishers" is MagnetElectro. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why removing content?
Talk:105 (number)

message: 105 has 3 prime factorization 5,7,and3.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.13.252 (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prime factorization {{resize|60%|({{Abbr|Posted without title|Title added by User:Askarion on December 13, 2023}})}}

message: It appears that 105 is a new GB-wide telephone number for calls about (electrical) power cuts; if so, it should be added to Wikipedia. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  GB Telephone 105
Talk:107 (number)

message: There is a song by Björk titled "107 Steps" and a book by Polish author Liliana Fabisińska titled "107 sekund". Is that something that would fit into this article? Daashu (talk) 10:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As this page is about the number 107, those topics may be more suitable for the disambiguation page 107 instead.  However, they would need to have a mention in Wikipedia, and we exclude partial title matches unless the topics are normally called simply "107". Certes (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media and culture
Talk:109 (number)

message: The lede says that 109 has a prime subscript, since it is the 29th prime number.  Apparently this is because 29 is itself a prime number.  Is this really a thing?  I can't find any definitions for the phrase prime subscripts that use the term in this context. It actually took me a few minutes to figure out what they meant by prime subscript.  Anyone have any ideas for how to make the verbiage easier to follow?  Would it harm the article to completely remove the reference to 109 being a prime subscript - is it something that anyone would even need to know? Does it give it any unique mathematical properties that would be used for computation?TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing math verbiage in the lede
Talk:112 (number)

message: If you have a look at this Facebook page advocating republicanism in Thailand, you'll see that, at the time of writing at least, very many of its 'fans' have a crossed out 112 on their profile pictures. What might 112 mean in this Thai political context? Beorhtwulf (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This question has since been answered at Talk:Monarchy of Thailand. Beorhtwulf (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Thailand
Talk:113 (number)

message: In the Four fours article, it says that 113 is difficult, not that it is impossible  under the standard rules.  Certainly, it doesn't say it's the smallest number unattainable under the standard rules.  Even if it did, it would need a source both there and here. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: http://paulbourke.net/fun/4444/ gives 5 ways to make 113 using nonstandard ​functions (nonstandard for the purposes of the four fours game, not for math in general), but nothing using only standard ​functions. HotdogPi 11:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  It doesn't say there isn't a standard representation, and may not be a reliable source.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends on what the "standard rules" are. Doesn't it? "Solutions from 0 to 116, not including 113 which is probably not findable by the rules given." http://www.wheels.org/math/44s.html  Ileanadu (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Four fours]]
Talk:115 (number)

message: I removed the following line:
* There are 115 keys on a standard computer keyboard.
A quick count of my Dell keyboard gave me 95. The computer keyboard article says "The number of keys on a keyboard varies from the original standard of 101 keys to the 104-key windows keyboards and all the way up to 130 keys or more."
So anyone wanting to put 115 keys back in the article had better give a brand and model. Anton Mravcek 19:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of keys on a computer keyboard
Talk:Tai Le

message: I think there is a confusion here. "Dai Le" (Chinese: Dǎilèyǔ 傣仂语) is Xishuangbanna Dai, known outside China as as Tai Lue or Tai Lü. The people call themselves tai51 lɯ11. "Not to be confused", indeed! The images in this article are Dehong Dai (Dai Nue). Babelfisch 05:13, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tai Le, Tai Lue ... 

message: I'm proposing to merge this article with Tai Lü. "Tai Le" is just another name for Tai Lü:
*Own name in IPA: [tâi lɯ̏]
*Chinese names: Xīshuāngbǎnnà Dǎiyǔ 西双版纳傣语, Dǎilèyǔ 傣仂语 (Wade-Gilese: Tai-le-yü)
*English names: Tai/Dai Lu/Lü/Lue/Ly/Le, Xishuangbanna/Sipsongpanna Dai, (Shui-)Pai-I
There was some confusion because there are two writing systems for this language, but I think that has been made clear. In the Article on Tai Lü, both alphabets should be described.
Another problem is that "Tai Le" seems to be used sometimes for Dehong Dai (Tai Nüa), which has also the following names in English: Dai/Tai Nuea/Nue/Nü/Na, Dehong Dai, Tai Mao, Chinese/Yunnanese Shan, Yunnan Shantou.
Before merging, the images have to be checked. I'm not quite sure which alphabet they show. The transcription is not very useful - it's neither IPA nor any official transcription system.
Any objections? — Babelfisch 03:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was confused by the change by Caiqian (20:01, 7 April 2005), who added the Chinese name "Dǎilèyǔ 傣仂语" - it should be "Dǎinǎyǔ 傣哪语". The title of the article suggests that it is about Tai Lü, and the addition of the Chinese name Dǎilè made the confusion perfect. I was further confused by Pratyeka in this discussion. Both Tai Lü (Xishuangbanna Dai) and Tai Nüa (Dehong Dai) have undergone reforms, but Tai Nüa is not an older form of Tai Lü. The images in this article are definitely New Tai Nüa (New Dehong Dai). I finally suggest that the information in this article be merged with Tai Nüa, which seems to be the most common name for this language. — Babelfisch 08:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Tai Lü
Talk:Workers' Party (France, 1991–2008)

message: I rewrote many of the facts that I presented in the original version of the article. Would you be so kind as NOT to overwrite them with some automated translation of some PT presentation? David.Monniaux 13:34, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a socialist, and I don't think this is really an attack. The Lambertists have generally been known for their creation of political intrigue (including sending members covertly into the Parti Socialiste). I think perhaps it could be reworded slightly and expanded, but it's for the most part accurate. --metzerly 18:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Support. The title "Workers' Party" is less awkward than "Party of the Workers", and the French Parti des Travailleurs can be accurately translated as "Workers' Party". Further, its Algerian counterpart is listed on Wikipedia under Workers' Party (Algeria). --metzerly 18:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no objections, the move has been done. I plan to also expand the article in the near future if no one else does so. --metzerly 23:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Tea for the Tillerman

message: I don't see the rationale here.  Wild World is a mega-hit and has countless cover versions, certainly a song that deserves its own article.  The article just needs to be expanded, but I really don't think it should be merged into this album's article, considering the song itself is much more famous than the album and Jimmy Cliff's version is more famous than that of Cat Stevens. - Unsigned comment by 70.58.209.143 22:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NP, sure, but get the single info, release date, charts, etc. I am not the strictest when it comes to merging so I'm trying to head off the strict constructionists. I was only ten (by one day!) when it came out and didn't get the album until the 80s, so someone who is more a Stevens devotee should do it. If you don't want to, let me know. --Fantailfan 00:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There is no real need to merge the articles, and so I am removing the merge tag. A cleanup might be more appropriate...? --anskas 21:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild World merge 

message: What even IS a tillerman? Does anyone know? I've never thought about before,but I have no idea what one is.
- I believe its a man who mans a tiller. Also, this song is the main theme for Extras 75.153.109.167 (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guys... 

message: not sure how to fix it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daverd2 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken infobox 

message: I'm curious about the dates posted here for Deluxe Edition: Disc 2.
#5 here is listed as 1974 and as "Japan."  #s 5 thru 7 are listed in the Liner Notes as "1976."  #s 6 & 7 are listed as "Majicat Earth Tour" - here as "Virginia."
#11 is listed here as "November 1971."  On the liner notes its listed as "Recorded 1979." "First transmitted June 22, 1970," which must be wrong, but i'm curious where the Editor found these Wiki dates?
There is one Citation for the "Cat Stevens – Tour Dates at Majicat" that conflicts with the Liner Notes, but that's it for citations.
albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally  Known as Al Gordon 21:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deluxe Edition: Disc 2
Talk:QED (text editor)

message: Does anyone know the expansion of QED and how QED is pronounced ? Jay 14:04, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I have no reference but I know that FRED and UNIX QED were "grown" for many years and became quite powerful tools.  Very different from EMACS, perhaps more like the Bourne Shell plus Perl.  They were powerful scripting platforms.
Because the command language was designed for interactive editing, it is extremely terse and hence scripts can be hard to read.
I think that the scripting was sufficiently different that one would not contemplate moving a script between implementations.  I know FRED's idea of quoting was very different from UNIX QED's.  (Example: to quote a character to prevent it being evaluated during n interpretation passes took 2^n -1 backslashes in FRED but one backslash plus n-1 "c" characters on UNIX QED.  \\\\\\\f vs \ccf)  DHR (talk) 21:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power of QED 

message: The link "An incomplete history of the QED text editor" is broken at the moment. The google cache however has an archived version: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Rvh1IEHF2KcJ:cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/qed.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=en
Hermel (talk) 11:19, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: The link is fixed and works again: http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/qed.html Hermel (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Broken again. An anonymous user just posted a version that goes to bell-labs.co, which I found too fishy to leave on the Wikipedia. Archive.org doesn't have the cm.bell-labs.com pages, unfortunately. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of QED
Talk:Abeokuta

message: The material from the 1911 encyclopedia is interesting, but it is also highly innacurate in parts, with a strongly propagandistic and condescending cast. Hopefully I'll soon be able to carry out a major overhaul of the text, though I wouldn't mind if someone else managed to get around to doing so before I did. 
Abiola Lapite 14:05, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: comments on EB1911
Talk:Corruption scandals in the Paris region

message: I'd be happy if somebody else helped me complete this! David.Monniaux 14:31, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: After reading this article it seems to me that anything in it not already in the article Jacques Chirac could be moved to that article and this article reduced to a link to that article.  Everything else in it seems too trivial and out of date to be of encyclopedic interest.  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainly about Chirac?
Talk:Don't Fight It (album)

message: I wanted to add a page about the song "Don't Fight It" written by Kenny Loggins
and performed by Loggins and Steve Perry (of Journey) in 1982.  The main article
of information (reference article) is here: http://www.aorblog.com/2009/05/kenny-loggins-steve-perry-dont-fight-it/
Addendum: more information on wikipedia:  "Don't Fight It" (US #17), which was co-written by Journey frontman Steve Perry, who also performs on the track and Neil Giraldo, Pat Benatar's husband and guitarist is featured on guitars.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Adventure
Thanks 75.152.99.48 (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't know how to add a different song/disambiguation page May 2011 
Talk:As Far as Siam

message: The article says that the song "Lunatic Fringe" is about John Lennon. Actually, I thought it was inspired by the life of Raoul Wallenberg. Note the use of guitar-generated Nazi sirens in the song's outro.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.205.139.7 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 4 August 2006  (UTC)
:You are indeed correct, the song was inspired by a book about Wallenberg, and was about the rise of antisemitism. I changed the text and added a cite from tomcochrane.com. --SigPig 04:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd note, however, that there is an extremely common belief that it's about Lennon. Bearcat (talk) 08:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Lunatic Fringe  
Talk:Voice of the Faithful

message: }}
The external links give plenty more information if anyone feels like expanding the article.Barbara Shack 15:41, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: I would question the objectivity of this page a bit.  It reads like it is a VOTF brochure.  There are many questions about the groups real goals and the veracity of its membership claims.
:I agree.  This page has major POV issues that need to be addressed, including the questions of genuineness and membership  numbers that you pointed out.-Onward ND 08:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Issues

message: While I did not understand User:Tucard's reversions to versions with poorer wording, that issue has been made irrelevant by some good reworking and content additions by User:Mgradel.  I have chipped in as well, mostly for organization, minor POV tempering, and wording style.  
There is one issue that hounds this page now though.  Many of the sources are from the New York Times, and after a week or so they become subscription only.  Per external links policy, those are not good links to use.  Let's make an effort to replace them with ones which will stand the test of time.  Otherwise, a lot of this material becomes unsourced.  Baccyak4H (Yak!) 02:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good news: those NYT articles can be resourced, as they have discontinued their subscription only web access.  Now we have to figure out what the new links ore to those articles... Baccyak4H (Yak!) 18:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing issues 

message: The article should maybe explain what was the initial reaction of Voice of the Faithful when the Vatican announced a ban on gay seminarians (see Instruction Concerning the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocations with regard to Persons with Homosexual Tendencies in view of their Admission to the Seminary and to Holy Orders). As I seem to recall, Voice of the Faithful was not entirely satisfied, and some in Rome were apparently criticizing Voice of the Faithful for hypocrisy, for wanting on one hand an end to clerical pedophilia, and on the other for being slightly opposed to a ban on gay seminarians. ADM (talk) 21:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't heard of their interest in such matters, but if you have good sources, give it a go.  Baccyak4H (Yak!) 04:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Views on ban of homosexual seminarians

message: The article's factual content may be correct, but the wording is very subjective and unencyclopedic for instance "shocking revelations" or "the moral, governance, and pastoral failures of Catholic bishops". Hence the POV-tag. --— Erik Jr. 00:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV