Talk:Southern California Crosstown Cup

message: The article is pretty descriptive. It is a prize awarded in two college sports rivalries. The main articles would be UCLA-USC rivalry and Cal-Stanford rivalry, which would cover the sports competition. The external link covers the specifics, and I am not sure how much could be lifted without copyright issues. Group29 19:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for expansion tag

message: It appears that the Cal/Stanford Lexus Gauntlet competition has gone dormant. The web site no longer shows a Cal/Stanford north link, and the old link only shows results from the end of the 2006-2007 school year. Group29 (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cal/Stanford discontinued

message: Program ended when Lexus terminated sponsor ship. Cal after losing also ended the program. Only alum Pedro Moura and USC counting the results. There is no participation from UCLA Athletics. Ucla90024 (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not what the cited reliable sources say...if you can find a source that says "there is no participation from UCLA Athletics" that would be worth discussing. — Scientizzle 14:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Continuing to remove content without engaging here is not constructive. If you don't think the sources cited count as reliable, go to WP:RS/N. If you want a broader discussion, use WP:RFC or at least Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Find a source that states that UCLA no longer participates formally or informally and cite it, please. — Scientizzle 15:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seeing as the user Ucla90024 continues to remove content that merits inclusion, I've returned it to the article and included two more sources.  USC reporting that it won: http://www.usctrojans.com/genrel/043012aaa.html and a Bruin fan site reporting that it lost: http://www.bruinsnation.com/2012/5/1/2991099/UCLA-USC-Gauntlet-Trophy-Fire-Dan-Guerrero-Gene-Block  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.60.63.30 (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  And since this was an issue for some reason, I'll include another link, which is UCLA officially mentioning it themselves when they won: https://twitter.com/UCLAAthletics/status/330107951366930432  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Embowaf (talk • contribs) 03:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Program ended

message: I'm in the process of rewriting this article to fit with the new sponsor.
I think it's time to look at the cal/stanford section and debate what should be done with it. With the new sponsor, it's becoming increasingly out of place...
Embowaf (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sponsor 

message: * Standing means the standing at this time, not the past or the future. Just like a win that was vacated is not a win and never will. Ucla90024 (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Standing

message: Since you obviously need to be explain things out in more space that a comment can provide, I'll do so here.
The scoring structure has not changed. Both schools still compete in 19 sports against each other. Neither school cancelled Sand Volleyball. A match was possible, prior to the NCAA selection.  It makes NO sense to change the scoring structure without some sort of official announcement that sand volleyball won't be included in the future. At the end of this season, we can make a footnote or something. But next season, it's likely they will play each other in all 19 sports. Or not. Who knows. But there's no justification for changing that. ESPECIALLY when you don't know for sure that there WON'T be sand volleyball points. It's possible that the Pac-12 invitational, which USC won, will count as a conference tournament. The rules are somewhat ambiguous.
IN ADDITION, you once again reverted a legitimate score update for no reason. USC finished ahead of ucla in men's golf. That happened. Therefore, USC get's 10 more points. It's clear the official site is frequently slow at updating. That doesn't change the universe.
You need to stop continuously putting your non-objective slant on this page, which you have been doing for years now.
Embowaf (talk) 06:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring Structure 

message: *The total points to win is 95 points per the official site , which now reads "NEXT EVENT: NO MORE EVENTS". The total points is 85+95=180 points. Ucla90024 (talk) 03:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Total Points

message: Since the SoCal BMW sponsorship of this Crosstown Cup ended after the 2015-2016 season (and it is now 2021), the title of the article should be changed to simply "Southern California Crosstown Cup". The article discusses the sponsorship of the competition starting with Lexus in 2001-2009 and BMW in 2014-2016, but also the periods of no sponsorship, such as currently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricSobel (talk • contribs) 21:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title to Southern California Crosstown Cup 

message: https://uclabruins.com/news/2024/5/16/bruin-athletics-ucla-wins-crosstown-cup-over-usc-in-record-fashion
UCLA reports the score as 120-70, but that's incorrect. They're showing a 1-0 UCLA lead in women's golf which is missing this head to head:
https://uclabruins.com/news/2024/2/5/womens-golf-no-4-womens-golf-concludes-therese-hession-regional-challenge
The correct score is 115-75. Embowaf (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023-2024 Score