lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Serial polygamy

message: I think this page should be deleted. There is no such thing as serial polygamy.—Red Baron 02:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have strong feelings either way, but here's my take on things.  Both serial monogamy and serial polygamy are valid ideas that extremely difficult to source and do not appear to have widespread popular or scientific cachet.  Both terms should realistically be rolled into a single page since they are talking about the same thing (marriage to more than one partner though never simultaneously) and the difference is one of semantics rather than research, definition or use.  Of the two terms, serial monogamy appears to have more sources, though none are particularly reliable or valid.  Rather, they are just enough to avoid the page getting deleted.  Since both terms mean the same thing and differ only in the intent or pejorative sense of the last word, I'd say leave in the re-direct, and if a source can be found, put a statement in how they are the same thing but differ in tone.  If you are serious about getting the page deleted (which I think is overkill considering it's just a redirect), you should go to WP:DEL and read up on the deletion policy.  It would probably fit under WP:NOT, but I would be voting for keep and might spend a bit of time seeing if I can find some sources to support the redirect.  WLU 17:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Rajgamar

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Rakasganda

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 05:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Page views
Talk:Ramanujganj

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Neil Blackmore

message: Changed to say 'British' novelist, rather than 'English', as the author was born and brought up in south Wales, and considers himself to be Welsh/British.
155.136.80.162 12:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Saraipali

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Sarangarh

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Shivrinarayan

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Added coord for Seorinarayan, which seems to be alternative name of this place. Link for this coord: []. However, not sure about the assumption. Please remove it if it turns out to be wrong. --GDibyendu (talk) 09:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  coord
Talk:Simga

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:List of neighbourhoods in Pune

message: Guys this page is created bringing all localities of pune at one place. Links here are red which means that corresponding pages are not created OR they are there but links are need to be corrected to point them. Please create pages that do not exist and/or help rectifying links.
[Annon]
As a international users I have a vague idea where this city is located, however you give no geographical reference here.  Please make it clear where this is at or put a reference to an article that gives a full description. From the name of the town it would seem to be in Australia or some place in Pakistan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.165.11.103 (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes there are some discrepancies in list. I am not sure about Dhankawdi, Katraj areas, I have not visited those areas, so you can change the those at your will. Also I agree that sinhgadh road should not come in kothrud, but then where does it go? Bawdhan is (maybe) wrongly mentioned in Aundh area, I think we can shift it in kothrud. About 8 sections, well If you feel they should be renamed, then come up with list here, and we can publish it once all interested users agree to it. spacejuncky 11:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is my first attempt
* City (old city) consists of peths like Shaniwar Peth, Sadashiv Peth, Kasba Peth, Narayan Peth, Ganesh Peth, Shukrawar Peth, Raviwar Peth, Budhwar Peth, Mangalwar Peth, Somwar Peth, Bhawani Peth, Guruwar Peth, Nana Peth, Navi Peth, 
* Deccan consists of sub localities like Shivaji Nagar, F.C Road, J.M. Road, Senapati Bapat Road, Bhandarkar Road, Prabhat Road, Corporation, University Road and vicinity.
* Camp stretches from Dhole Patil Road and vicinity on the ----  Koregaon Park, Ghorpuri, Shankarshet road and salisbury Park on the ----, M.G.Road and vicinity being the central shopping area.
* Aundh consists of Aundh, Baner, Khadki, Pashan.
* Kalyani Nagar consists of Kalyani Nagar, Viman Nagar, Bund Garden, Yerawda and Vishrantwadi
* Kothrud consists of Kothrud, Karve Nagar, Paud Road ending at the outskirts of the city and the newly developed area of Bavdhan.
* Kondhwa consists of Kondhwa, Hadapsar, Fatima Nagar, Lulla Nagar, Wanowarie.
* Dhankawadi consists of Dhankawadi, Katraj, Bibwewadi and the areas around the Pune-Satara Road (starting from Swargate) including marketyard the wholesale vegetable, fruit and grain market. 
I was thinking of more geographically based names for example Northeast, southwest, north of river or something like that rather than Dhankawadi, Aundh etc. It is misleading as Aundh is just Aundh and not Aundh Baner, Pashan. I have to think a bit more about it though and look closely at the map.  --Kaveri 17:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Good work, list seems more refined. Your last point of geographically dividing pune is also ponderous. Go ahead and put everything you think here. I will chip in whenever I get time.
Cheers! spacejuncky 04:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:Sirgiti

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Takhatpur

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Tamor Pingla Wildlife Sanctuary

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Happy model school kurahuan is a very famous school and is added into the top 10 list of Varanasi. Happy model school consists of more than 1000 of students and hundred of teachers. There are more than 500 of servants maids and incharges who severe. It is very from class nursery to class 12. The best student of Happy model school is of class 7th b. Astha Kumari Singh , avani Pandey and Raunak verma are few topper students. 103.214.61.138 (talk) 13:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happy model school kurahuan
Talk:Bhatgaon, Surajpur

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Rachel Cox (actress)

message: she was in the show when she was 0-2 years old. she was more of a prop. didn't play anyone just got convinced not to cry during a take  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Planetstasiak (talk • contribs) 08:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agre and this page should probably be deleted as well. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, all these babies' pages that have been created for EE babies should be redirected to the character articles or deleted. Majority have not acted again.GunGagdinMoan 12:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  not really an actor is she?
Talk:Ratanpur, Chhattisgarh

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Rachel DeWoskin

message: PROD concern stated as "No indication of notability. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG". A search of Newspapers.com shows that there are profiles of her and reviews of her books, certainly sufficient to meet WP:NAUTHOR. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD removal
Talk:Tilda Newra

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Urla, Raipur

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Rachel Ehrenfeld

message: Removed the sentence "In countries where personal rights are more valued, such public accusations need to be backed up by solid fact before being published," for a non-neutral point of view. It can be argued that greater protection from libel lawsuits protects the rights of the person being sued. Both statements are opinions, and neither are neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.231.58.16 (talk) 20:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This biography is categorized in "American Israel Public Affairs Committee", but I don't see any references to AIPAC in the article and couldn't find anything with a cursory search on the web. Is there a source that establishes or clarifies this connection? --189.209.114.69 (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AIPAC connection?
Talk:Rhynchophorus ferrugineus

message: This single critter appears to share a lot of common names with a lot of other similar critters within the same genus. I wish there was a way to be sure that we are all speaking to the same organism. They are all "red palm weevils", but this one is ferrugineus.Aderksen (talk) 22:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there is a name confusion because this Rhynchophorus_bilineatus is also called Sago weevil. Ebson (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common names? 

message: I'm not sure that this weevil is the one being used as a food source by the indigenous peoples of Ecuador, given that it is only recently adventive to the area. I suspect that another editor has confused this weevil with the Palmetto Weevil, or the Sago Palm Weevil, who are also native to the area. Yet another confusion over common names and species names... Aderksen (talk) 22:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there is a name confusion because this Rhynchophorus_bilineatus is also called Sago weevil. Ebson (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: food source?

message: I note that "capricorn beetle" redirects to this page, but I suspect that this is the common name of a cerambycid beetle, and does not refer to this  curculionid from tribe rhynchophorini. This redirect should really be broken. Aderksen (talk)
:Glad to see that someone fixed this. Thanks! Aderksen (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capricorn redirect?

message: Hello  Thank you for fixing these  errors . However I also notice you've removed the  s with the edit summary . These are not typos. Why? Invasive Spices (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: CE is copyediting in general, and it's very non-standard to include publishers in journal citations. It's certainly not done in any major citation style out there. That PLOS ONE is published by PLOS is ... not really relevant.  Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

text: *Ok well if you want to object to the existence of  you can do that at Template talk:Cite journal. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite journal publisher removal
Talk:Rachel G. Fox

message: I've reworded the remarks about Fox on Stocks, to make it clear that her success as a stock trader is not yet verifiable by reference to a reliable source.
I wish to make three points. First, what is verifiable is not that she is a successful stock trader, only that this website describes her that way. Second, I don't think we actually know to what extent the blog is her own work--it is interesting that the contact information refers us to a media firm. And, third, of course a blog isn't a reliable source for anything other than its own content. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Successful" stock trader; reliable source issues

message: For the past six or so hours, numerous IP editors and one newly-registered editor have been editing this article to add Fox's death, none citing sources of any kind.
I've been deleting them, and the page is now semi-protected to prevent them from being re-added. There are no reliable sources reporting the death. In the the past hour, there are a number of non-RSs making the claim, such as celebritiesdeaths.com and belarus.tenzica.com (purportedly a Belarus outlet; why someone in Belarus would have a scoop on this is a mystery to me).
Some of the reports identifies the individual as "Rachel Fox" (without the middle initial "G") or as "Rachel Heather Fox"; and as a 47-year-old. IMDB (I know, itself not a RS) reports Fox's DOB as July 23, 1996, which would make her 24 years old today; regardless of IMDB's veracity, Fox was clearly not thirty-two years old during her appearances on Desperate Housewives. So even if published reports are true, it could be a completely different person of the same name. Nothing in the reports appears to connect the decedent with an acting career, and the "connection" appears to be nothing more than similarity of non-identical names.
Please, let's not be in a rush to add information that might be wrong. Wikipedia is not a news organization and there's no need to "scoop" the actual news sources on which we rely. If Fox has actually died, we can add that information once it's reliably reported. TJRC (talk) 22:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purported death
Talk:Rachel Hadas

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Rachel Leskovac

message: I've added a reference to the article that confirms she's expecting a baby, though I can't find any more articles in relation to the info already placed in the article. There's no references or citations (other than the one I added) and furthermore, the external link to the 'Agency's CV' is not working. I'll remove this until it's updated/another source is found (http://www.pfd.co.uk/clients/leskovar/a-act.html) . Also I'd appreciate it if any experienced users could look over the article edits to see if I've done it okay, took me ages to work out how to add the citations bit! Londonsista (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of References
Talk:Rachel Nabors

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Rachel Podger

message: can't you find more sources that discuss her?
I'm not sure of notability for en wiki but one bbc interview?
Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 19:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She passes WP:Notability (music) on the recordings alone, plus the one-hour BBC radio show. Suessmayr, your personal opinions about the article's subject are inappropriate for a talk page, and especially one for a living person. Please do not continue in this vein. Voceditenore (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  only one interview enough for notability?
Talk:Rachel Portman

message: The last paragraph of the introduction section states: "Her acute career choices complement her compositional gifts..."
I think the word 'acute' should probably be 'astute' and may be a transcription error from the source: a book called 'Women's Music for the Screen'. Please can someone check it who has access to the book. JeremyDClark (talk) 12:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in transcribed quote
Talk:Henry Cecil, 1st Marquess of Exeter

message: It would be interesting to know the thinking behind making a new rank of peerage - new to Britain, that is - with the initiation of the new peerage of the UK of B & I.  Is it documented anywhere?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.246.115.4 (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marquessate
Talk:Radi Nedelchev

message: The Serbian and German versions of this article say he died in 2007, but they don't cite a reference, and I can't find one. --Delirium (talk) 15:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  death? 
Talk:Lúnasa (album)

message: Who keeps deleting the fact that track 12 is a bonus track on 2001 copies only? They delete the fact that it's a bonus track and count it as part of the main album. It is slightly annoying and i want to know why it keeps getting reverted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.83.125.225 (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing it on the grounds that it's trivia, and that violates Wiki's policy on trivia. It's unnecessary information. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 'bonus tracks' written on almost every album. Bonus tracks from iTunes, bonus tracks from Japan, so i don't believe bonus tracks apply to wiki trivia policy.  --77.99.231.37 (talk) 15:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Settle down, and stop being disruptive with your edits. I've added a line about the twelfth track. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2001 Bonus track
Talk:Tommy Kane

message: I don't know much about this guy, but I am pretty sure he was never a high school president, and I KNOW that is not  the main descriptor for him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:D500:3D00:C4B7:AA4B:9B3C:345E (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  former high school president
Talk:San Pedro High School

message: I go here, and I'm extremely doubting that someone's name is Elvis Presley.
adamson ☮ 02:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Rocket Team president 
Talk:Open-question argument

message: While I think my changes (better organization, extra rebuttals, citations etc.) improve from where it was before, I'll let the "clean up" box remain for now; I cited from only one book, after all.  If anybody else thinks the box isn't needed though, feel free to remove it.  I didn't remove it partly because, to me, it neared a conflict of interest (am I the the most unbiased judge to tell my changes were good enough?).
--Wade A. Tisthammer (talk) 03:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Why does open question argument divert to naturalistic fallacy but open question diverts to this page and the title reads 'Open Question Argument'? Naturalistic fallacy appears to be better sourced and talks about the same thing. -Bottlecapninja 12:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous

message: I think the article makes a mistake by identifying externalism with the Humean Theory of Motivation. See http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-motivation/ for definitions and distinctions. --86.26.20.225 (talk) 08:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internalism, Externalism, and the Humean Theory of Motivation 

message: Seems biased, unclear and poorly sourced (one personal  blog).
1Z (talk) 11:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sense and Reference

message: — Assignment last updated by RudyCarnap (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHIL 390 Contemporary Philosophy

message: This article mixes UK and US punctuation styles. Please choose one and stick with it. 2001:268:922D:863D:89:183F:B65C:3F11 (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please use consistent styles