lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Analytics

message: It may be useful to add another section, Health Analytics, to the Analytics#Applications section.
This could include an expansion of the following: 
: Health analytics is the process of translating biomedical data and healthcare information obtained in medical, biological, clinical, public health, and laboratory settings to relevant clinical decision-support information that can be used to diagnose disease, decide on medical treatments, and prognosticate health-related outcomes . All health analytical systems rely on informatics, computer science, applied mathematics, computational statistics, model-based and model-free artificial intelligence, and machine learning techniques.
: See also Health_care_analytics. 141.213.169.143 (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggesting adding "Health Analytics" section

message: I added sources to some paragraphs, but there are still several points of information for which I could not find a reliable source. I am also not sure about the reliability of several sources. I added new tags for these issues. Tommyren (talk) 16:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:He Thinks He's Ray Stevens

message: The proper title of this song <S>(and album)</S> is "The Mississippi Squirrel Revival". --Closeapple 07:06, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The song "The Mississippi Squirrel Revival" appears to have been released in 1984 on 2 similar albums: He Thinks He's Ray Stevens (LP and cassette) and also Mississippi Squirrel Revival (cassette only), which has 8 of the 10 songs from He Thinks He's Ray Stevens.  The album Mississippi Squirrel Revival was then rereleased in 1992 (CD only).  See the Ray Stevens album discography.  Confused yet?  It was also released on 2 or 3 of his multitude of "greatest hits" albums.  --Closeapple 07:06, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: "The Mississippi Squirrel Revival" was released in 1984, but the rather similar "Three German Police Dogs And An Ol' Yellow Cat at the Ebenezer Freewill Baptist Church All Day Singing And Dinner On the Ground Homecoming" was released by Wendy Bagwell in 1983.  Could one have inspired the other, or is it just coincidence? Captain Packrat (talk) 04:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration for the song
Talk:Discrete group

message: Hi;
I'm trying desperately to understand many of these advanced principals of mathematics, such as discrete groups, but no matter how many times I review the material, it doesn't sink in. Could someone please provide examples, problems to solve (with their solutions) and/or ways to visualize this?
beno 26 Jan 2006
Would it be reasonable to say that a discrete group is one with a cardinality not greater than aleph-null?
:No. A discrete group can have any cardinality. Charles Matthews 07:57, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New To Advanced Math

message: "...underlying groups. Hence, there is an isomorphism between the category of groups and the category of discrete groups..."
:Is the isomorphism to the category of discrete groups a functor and is it adjoint to the inverse isomorphism? Woud the inverse isomorphism be a forgetful functor?76.218.104.120 (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this isomorphism a functor? 
Talk:Rhythmic contemporary

message: "played at clubs and school dances" and "though not too many" are completely unfounded statements until cited, as well as very colloquial without statistical evidence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackoutalterego (talk • contribs) 07:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too colloquial and improperly cited 

message: sometimes i think 'urban' is a stupid term. then i remember this chart. W guice 17:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupidest ever chart name? 

message: I've genuinely never seen such a broad generalization and absolutely outlandish un-cited "core demographic." What's "not too many"? 10? 15? A million?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.114.173 (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm..
Talk:Henry Pogorzelski

message: If anyone actually has any familiarity with Pogorzelski's attempted proof of the Goldbach conjecture (or knows what exactly is meant by "the consistency hypothesis" and/or "the extended Wittgenstein thesis"), I would be very interested in hearing about it, and seeing it incorporated into this article. -Chinju 07:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Original Kings of Comedy

message: Quotes moved to Wikiquote. --FuriousFreddy 08:38, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know why they were called "The Original Kings of Comedy"? D.L. Hughley looks like he was born some time in the 1960's. And I would venture to guess that Steve Harvey is the oldest and looks to be in his early to mid 50's. There were numerous comedy titans before these gentlemen. I'm not saying they are not funny. I'm just saying why are they called "The Original Kings of Comedy"? Swatson1978 02:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You forget, it's a Spike Lee film. They clearly MUST be the Original Kings. Rockhound 02:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Another insulting creation from a very good director/social commentator. i'm sure he knows his entertainment history.. but calling THESE young men The ORIGINAL Kings..? yes there was a King of Comedy, during the Golden Age of TV (not the 30's) the 1950's. See also My Favorite Year. thx 2600:1700:A760:C10:419C:F325:E7C4:74FE (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The Title

message: In Cedric's performance, he does a disco-style breakdance as a sign of fighting between two rival gangs. What was the song called? Rockhound 02:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disco Song

message: Some of this article was plagiarized from Elvis Mitchell's NY Times review, without credit. I have added credit in the Bernie Mac section of this article (and I will try to correct any plagiarism I find), but whoever maintains this page should check into it as well. Clockster (talk) 08:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Attributions
Talk:Samkon Gado

message: Can anyone provide a source on the fact he wears number 35 because of Christian Okoye?--Alhutch 07:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see that he probably does wear the number 35 because of Okoye, but a google search turns up no mention of the nickname "God". I'm removing it until someone can provide a verifiable source.--Alhutch 07:40, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Check the official packers.com bio of Gado - confirms he wears the number to honor Okoye. Kybard 07:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Okoye 

message: Did Samkon suffer a season-ending injury last night on the MNF game against the Ravens? --Teenwriter 21:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  GADO HURT? 
Talk:Sovereign's Orb

message: "It was created for the coronation of King Charles II in 1661 at a cost of £1,150."
- Does anyone know if the £1,150 cost is in 1661 pounds or adjusted for 2005 pounds?
:1661. In 2005 pounds that wouldnt even pay for the design work. --Stbalbach 15:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I used http://eh.net/hmit/ppowerbp/ to get an estimate of that figure in modern terms. Edit as necessary. Cat Parade 15:00, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

message: does anyone have a picture? i think it would add a lot to the article.Gimlifangirl (talk) 02:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture?
Talk:Tooker Gomberg

message: lost his chutzpah?  yeah, that's professional.  even if that was his term (which i doubt), put it in quotes.  Wencer 07:47, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since there were no other comments on the POV issue, i deleted the disputed line (NPOV for ONE LINE? Deleting it yourself seems a bit more appropriate) and removed the POV tag.  
--Chalyres 09:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed POV comments and NPOV tag 

message: The article says his wife... but also mentions a partner. So, which is it? See tag in article. Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: wife vs partner
Talk:Ivory Coast

message: The redirect Côte d'Ivoire, has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Côte d'Ivoire,]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: My reasoning: I disagree that "Ivorian" NOT having a link somehow makes the article better. Before I added more, several African & South American country articles linked the demonym to the article with its exact name. Around half the time, it was a redirect to the people (e.g. Peruvian redirects to Peruvians). For countries that don't have an article for the people, the demonym redirects to "Demographics of [country]". (This is before I copied that format for the rest of the African countries.) The Ivorian article has multiple links, letting the reader choose, rather than me dictating by linking to "Demographics of Ivory Coast".   — TARDIS builder✉     •       05:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for "Ivorian"
Talk:Nothing Gold Can Stay (album)

message: The article indicates there are two different versions of the album (one containing samplings from The Outsiders, one without). It seems likely that these two versions would have different track lengths. Is this the case, and if so, does the track listing in the article refer to the version without samplings? 24.184.97.102 (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Hit or Miss" is 3:15 only when the samples are not included, so one can assume these track listings are for the re-release (I am not sure about the others as I don't know if there were samples used in any other track but "Hit or Miss") - 67.187.245.98 (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing 
Talk:Spring Woods High School

message: Just me, perhaps, but I think it's a bit much to have it down to neighborhoods - especially as there are several different meanings of the term, including the official city one and the one established already for Houston neighborhoods on wikipedia (see Memorial Park for an example). I very much doubt that the ones linked will ever be anything more than redlinks as they aren't exactly the largest entities in existence. However, it's not something I'm going to fight anyone over, either - I rather like the idea, but I think it's a bit too specific. Thoughts? Souperman 08:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neighborhoods

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "multiple" :
** Spring Branch Independent School District - Houston
** Feeder schools at SBISD.com
DumZiBoT (talk) 09:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references !
Talk:Former capitals of Chinese provinces

message: Here we are recognizing only Chiang Kai-shek's government over Hu Hanmin's government or Wang Jingwei's government. Is this appropriate? It looks like a case of victors writing the history pov to me. --Jiang 08:41, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but if we listed all of the regimes that have ever existed in the past 600+ years, the situation would quickly become unmanageable here... -- ran (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The other Nationalist Governments

message: I know it's a sensitive topic, but at least the two entries of Tibet should be put in the same row for consistency?? Many parts of China have proclaimed themselves or been proclaimed as independent then or later, but I don't see any of those separate states having their own row in the table. --Sumple 04:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tibet (Dalai Lama's realm??)
Talk:George Washington and Jefferson National Forests

message: I was unable to locate the creation date of this forest.--MONGO 09:55, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are two national forests, each with its own details, covered by one article? I'm not seeing why this makes more sense than Brooklyn and Queens or Navajo Nation and Hopi Reservation or Laos and Cambodia. Largoplazo (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: probably because they are now administered as a single entity.--WilderAddict (talk) 13:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see: https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/gwj/about-forest. The subject of the article is not so much the forests as the single entity now comprising the two of themthe name of which continues to characterize them as forestS, hence my confusion. Thanks. Largoplazo (talk) 15:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

text: I've made an edit in the lead that I believe will add clarity and precision. Even if they're being administered together, though, it seems to me that the two forests ought to have their own articles, as does any large forest, and most of the content in this article is already segregated into material covering one or the other. It would make sense to push all that content into freestanding articles and then let this article link to them while retaining all the content that applies to the administrative unit as a whole. I'm considering drafting the new articles and a reduced version of this one. Largoplazo (talk) 15:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

text: The forest service conducts separate reviews for the two forests, so separating the two forests would make some sense.  Combining the two forests under one supervisor was probably a result of reducing administrative expenses.--WilderAddict (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this a single article?
Talk:Jordan Staal

message: Awards: First teen to play in a Stanley Cup in history.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.141.51 (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marc Staal

message: I guess it would be noteworthy if I put in the fact that Marc led the Sudbury wolves to their first OHL finals in 30 years. -- Zblewski|talk  01:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolves
Talk:Joe Kocur

message: When was this guy born?  The only reference cited states September 21, 1964, but it has been listed as December as well.  Rejectwater (talk) 12:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Eddie Bernice Johnson

message: THe map appears to be from a US Federal Government source. That usually means that it is in the pubic domaiin (although the trademarks may not be). You should double check this, but if it is, you should upload it,or a modified versioin of it, to WIkipedia, as internal content is always preferable to external links. --David Woolley 10:16, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Map may be embeddable

message: I removed the "Controversy" section per WP:BLP. There were no sources cited at all. First, to have a section named "Controversy", you need reliable sources characterizing something as controversial. We can't just say something is a controversy. There has to be notable opinion that it is controversial. The comment she made also needs to be reliably sourced, as well as the claims about her critics. So that's probably three (maybe only two) reliable sources that are required before that section can go back in. Crockspot 01:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy section removed

message: We had a blanking incident again today - this one stemming from the Washington D.C. area. I've restored the affected section. Keep in mind that this could be whitewashing - or it could be someone trying to make the subject look guilty of whitewashing. We could investigate further, but in the overall scheme of things, this is both trivial and easy to fix. Rklawton (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't kid yourself, it was obviously one of Johnson's minions from her congressional office.  They're doing all they can to keep this crime out of the news, and they're going to delete it from wikipedia over and over again.  The page probably should be locked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.69.3.2 (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In the world of dirty political tricks, it could just as easily be someone on the other side trying to make it look that way. Rklawton (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Blanking

message: Is her name Johnson, Eddie Bernice or Johnson Bernice, Eddie? V. Joe (talk) 20:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: =Name
Category talk:Billionaires

message: This category is quite similar to :Category:Forbes World's Richest People. Shawnc 10:39, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: What's with the focus on USD/EU/UKP? Either stick to one currency (I'd say USD as it *is* the most significant worldwide) or the list means nothing much. And USD/EU/UKP aren't that comparable to each other, especially since a UK pound is almost 2 USD. If that is the case, then a currency at around 1/2 USD should also be in there, making the list even more...worthless. Shrumster 06:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currency 

message: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_31#Category:Millionaires reflects a consensus that having over 1 million dollars would be to cluttered and that it's not notable enough anymore.
The jump to billionaires is a pretty big one though.
Two intermediate terms exist which are worth noting:
"decamillionaire" would be someone with at least 10 million. That MIGHT be worth noting but I'm not 100% sure there. Even if it is now, eventually it might not be due to inflation.
*not to be confused with "decimillionaire" which would be someone with only 100k, "deca" is 10x while "deci" is 1/10
"hectomillionaire" would refer to someone with at least 100 million which seems like the best new category to use. WakandaQT (talk) 06:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: related wealth categories
Talk:Royal Antediluvian Order of Buffaloes

message: The only link to "Buffs" seems to come in a context that suggests that they are using it as a synonym for "aficionado."  Maybe we could fix this redirect to something like "Buffs(order)" so there's no confusion and that article has a proper red link (since that article references an etymological origin and thus can't be satisfied by changing the link to "enthusiast" or "aficionado" even if those were encyclopedic rather than dictionary topics).
71.37.61.147 10:54, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Buffs?

message: My father - a publican - hosted an RAOB lodge, he told me it  meant "Ragged arsed old buggers"
:Yes my grandfather was a buff and he used that quote often too.  I don't think it's an official title though! -- 86.132.156.213 22:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It couldn't be...we're not all old :-) 160.84.253.241 13:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other meaning of RAOB 

message: The external links section seems to be turning into a mini-directory. Much as though I would not wish to remove these good natured lodges and people from our encyclopedia, its getting a bit long/big. Could we trim it, or create a separate list article? Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should be trimmed … done. Alexbrn 15:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: External liks: turning into a directory

message: I had only heard of this as an abbreviation for Radiosonde observation.  I was going to put a hatnote in, but our Radiosonde article never uses the abbreviation "raob" itself so it might be an old fashioned term from the days when computers were ruled by 8 character file names.—Soap— 16:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radisonde 

message: The article seems to imply that the RAOB claims its origins from ancient times (before the flood) - this is incorrect. In the initiation ceremony it is explained that our principles of brotherly love, good fellowship & benevolence date from ancient times, not the Order itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.104.221.28 (talk) 08:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion. Section 'Name changes' updated. --Wire723 (talk) 15:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antediluvian 

message: By way of small fines, donations and fees, money would be raised to assist an indignant member who was in need.
Did the author mean "indigent"? 82.43.85.27 (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indignant?
Talk:Caretaker manager

message: I have added the following:
*John McGlynn (Hearts) 
*Sammy McIlroy (Morecambe) 
*Neil Redfearn (Scarborough) 
I also added a  tag, although maybe  would be more appropriate.
- N (talk) 11:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  Iffy★Chat -- 17:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Caretaker manager →  – While natural disambiguation is preferred to parenthetical, the term "caretaker manager" does not appear in this article even one single time.  is already a redirect to interim management, which should be retained per WP:PTOPIC. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 15:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 August 2021
Talk:Deverill Hall

message: Well done for adding this - always good to have the sum of available Wodehouse knowledge added to! I've added links and fixed a couple of typos. Also, I'm pretty sure that Wodehouse himself forms the possessive of "Jeeves" simply by adding an apostrophe, rather than apostrophe-'s'. I've changed this and I'll check it. I ninety percent sure I'm right; if I'm wrong I'll change it back. Bedesboy 11:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeeves's or Jeeves'