Talk:Congress of the Confederation

message: First line of the Second Paragraph: "The Congress of the Confederation opened in the midst of the American Revolution."  American Revolution links to the wikipedia article on the American Revolution.  However there is also an article: American War of Independence.  The former article discusses the political and philosphical angle of the American Revolution, while the latter focuses on the course of the war and the battles themselves.  I suggest the link should instead be to the American War of Independence article.  Mainly, because it appears it main point of the sentence is to emphasize that the Congress of the Confederation began during wartime. Any thoughts?  --Chops79 00:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: “American Revolution” v. “American War of Independence”

message: Originally just called congress,  the colonies had passed 12 different resolutions naming the Philadelphia gathering and its membership in various different forms:
New Hampshire … General Congress; Massachusetts … meeting of Committees from the several Colonies; Rhode Island … general congress of representatives; Connecticut … Congress of commissioners; New York … Congress at Philadelphia; New Jersey … general Congress of deputies; Pennsylvania … Colony Committees; Maryland … General Congress of deputies from the Colonies; Virginia … General Congress; South Carolina … deputies to a general Congress; Delaware … general continental congress;  North Carolina … general Congress. 
It was Delaware’s term “Continental Congress” that was officially adopted on October 20, 1774 as the name primarily to distinguish this congress from the many congresses being held throughout the Colonies at that time. On that date the assembling colonies passed the Articles of Association that acknowledged the formation of a Continental Congress of September 5, 1774.  This Association would ultimately declare its Independence from Great Britain on July 2, 1776.  The Articles of Association began:
“We, his majesty's most loyal subjects, the delegates of the several colonies of New-Hampshire, Massachusetts-Bay, Rhode-Island, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, the three lower counties of Newcastle, Kent and Sussex on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North-Carolina, and South-Carolina, deputed to represent them in a continental Congress, held in the city of Philadelphia, on the 5th day of September, 1774” 
This term was used until March 2, 1781, the day after the Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress with Maryland, the 13th State's ratification the new constitutional body adopted the name ,United States in Congress Assembled,  and it was placed at the head of new Journals (http://www.roi.us/Exhibit%20C.JPG ). On that day the Continental Congress ceased to exist.  No where could this author find an entry in the new Journals of the United States in Congress Assembled that the body referred to itself as the Continental Congress.  The first US Constitution itself clearly names the governing body in Article II:
:" Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled." 
The documentation on this matter is summed up best in "STANLEY KLOS, Plaintiff, Appellant v. HENRY M. PAULSON, JR., in his capacity as Secretary of the Treasury,  Defendant, Appellee" which can be found here - http://www.roi.us/complaint.htm . The "Congress of the Confederation" is not the name of the first US Constitutional Government and it should be immediately replaced with the proper name.  — Preceding NatsSolk comment added by NatsSolk (talk • contribs) 02:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: At the beginning of the given source it is apparent that Klos is a WP:Fringe opinion not supported by consensus TEDickey (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Congress of the Confederation" versus "United States in Congress Assembled"

message: Why is the Continental Congress template in this article? It confuses and, therefore, reduces the quality of this article. That's why I'm removing it.
--TMH (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It gives the user the context in which it lies (though one might consider improving the template, if there's some additional emphasis needed for this topic) Tedickey (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is the Continental Congress template in this article?

message: The chart lists the Walter Livingston House in New York City as the meeting place of the Congress during the latter part of the eighth Congress in 1788 and the sole meeting place of the ninth Congress ending in 1789 (although this was the session which ended with one member present), yet there is no Wikipedia article for the house and no mention of this in the Walter Livingston article. Livingston built a large home in 1774, but it is not in New York city and its article has no mention of the Continental Congress. Any further information or clarity would be useful. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. this interesting site and page has more material. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Walter Livingston House

message: The image identified as Old City Hall is incorrect. The image is Federal Hall. As Wikipedia's own article on Federal Hall notes, the Old City Hall was renovated according to a L'Enfant design during the fall of 1788 and winter of 1789. The renovation, done for the First Session of the Congress under the newly ratified U.S. Constitution, resulted in a radical change in appearance and a new name: Federal Hall. L'Enfant gave the building an entirely new facade and a new cupola. For side-by-side depictions illustrating the difference see this site. For discussion of the renovation by L'Enfant, see Bowling, The Creation of Washington, D.C., pp. 97-98. The link mentioned above under the Walter Livingston House entry further explains that the Confederation Congress had to meet elsewhere once the renovation began in October 1788. The image of Federal Hall should be replaced with an image of Old City Hall before the renovations. The Confederation Congress never met in the renovated building. Jstephenclark (talk) 08:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point and research. Can someone please image load an image of the Old City Hall as described above? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Old City Hall is incorrect