Talk:Pearl necklace (sexual act)/Archive 2

message: I have again removed unsourced items from the Trivia section. These items had been tagged as needing citations in early January. I accordingly removed the items after no attempt had been made for a full month to provide citations. Per Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden of evidence, these items may not be re-added to the article until and unless they are cited from reliable sources. -- Donald Albury 12:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced trivia 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Linkimage}} 

message: (Moving this discussion here, as it was in a less-than-useful place. Mangojuicetalk 17:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you both mad?  What we really need is a raytraced CG image with bitmapped textures and lens flares. Rob T Firefly 01:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: It may not be a wonderful example but until someone uploads a better example, it gives people some idea of what is meant by 'pearl necklace': more illustrative than text alone.  --Interesdom 08:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

text: WikiProjects are not policies or guidelines, and anyone can possibly add what they want to these pages. This article is also not part of that project (see top of this talk page), so you probably confused WikiProject Pornography with WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. There is, however, a related policy proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality/WIP-image-guidelines, but it has failed to achieve consensus and seems to be currently pretty inactive. Maybe you are interested in reviving the discussion. Prolog 21:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, this article is also not part of that project.    — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Is there any way to fix the link so that it doesn't cause page stretching (as it does on my 1280x1024 display)? Also note that I personally think that it should be an embedded image, but I'm not going to change it without consensus. --Darksun 12:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: While compromise would be nice, using linkimage is not it. The long discussion above is not about removing or keeping the image, but keeping the image inline or using the linkimage template. I don't see how something that most editors disagree with could be called a compromise. Although the template survived the Tfd, the use of it is still often controversial and the common opinion in the deletion discussion was to seek consensus on case-by-case basis. There apparently is such consensus on a few articles, but I don't see it here. Prolog 12:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I don't see consensus to use linkimage here.    — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The ethnicity of the recipient is irrelevant to understanding the subject of the article. Joie de Vivre 14:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I was able to understand the topic with the depiction at the current size. Joie de Vivre 14:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion from [[Image talk:Sexuality pearl necklace small.png]]

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Structure "Pictures should not include the person covered in any bodily fluids, including semen"  Joie de Vivre 17:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WikiProjects are not policies or guidelines, and anyone can possibly add what they want to these pages. This article is also not part of that project (see top of this talk page), so you probably confused WikiProject Pornography with WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. There is, however, a related policy proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality/WIP-image-guidelines, but it has failed to achieve consensus and seems to be currently pretty inactive. Maybe you are interested in reviving the discussion. Prolog 21:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, this article is also not part of that project.    — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Is there any way to fix the link so that it doesn't cause page stretching (as it does on my 1280x1024 display)? Also note that I personally think that it should be an embedded image, but I'm not going to change it without consensus. --Darksun 12:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: While compromise would be nice, using linkimage is not it. The long discussion above is not about removing or keeping the image, but keeping the image inline or using the linkimage template. I don't see how something that most editors disagree with could be called a compromise. Although the template survived the Tfd, the use of it is still often controversial and the common opinion in the deletion discussion was to seek consensus on case-by-case basis. There apparently is such consensus on a few articles, but I don't see it here. Prolog 12:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I don't see consensus to use linkimage here.    — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The ethnicity of the recipient is irrelevant to understanding the subject of the article. Joie de Vivre 14:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I was able to understand the topic with the depiction at the current size. Joie de Vivre 14:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted image