lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St. Thomas Evangelical Church of India

message: I am a witness to many of the happenings in the Mar Thoma Church between 1947 and 1961. I know personally many of the members who joined the St. Thomas Evangelical Church. Neduvelilmathew (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Witness

message: In Aug 2017, seven years of edits were removed and are not revertible under a "copyright claim."  How can so many years of independent edits be removed and decided thusly??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.27.229.237 (talk) 16:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Seven Years of Edits Removed??

message: Regarding the edit  on St. Thomas Evangelical Church, I still don't like it. Unfortunately, I can't read the Google Books reference; it seems once the site gets a few hits on an item, it rejects further ones with a message that some limit has been reached. I did reread the passage from Mark 7. I think it's the phrasing I don't like, "further reducing the church's human baggage (traditions) picked up along its journey through history". I find the phrase "human baggage" odd, though I understand what 'baggage' means in the sense that I've dated a few people who brought more to the relationship than could be stored in the overhead compartment. It still doesn't seem clear what is being said here. Also, "picked up along its journey through history" seems a bit flowery and verbose for an encyclopedia.
Normally, I would be on my way, and leave Wikipedia to work its magic, but this article has fewer than 30 watchers. So in the interest of WP:BRD, can I challenge you to find a clearer rewording? Cheers. Willondon (talk) 04:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree with you on the flowery and verbose part for encyclopedic purpose. I get that you understand the sentence and its reference. If you are willing to suggest a reworded sentence, it could be used. The baggage is related to the traditions and man made functions in churches that each reformation challenges and sought to diminish by following the bible in its traditional sense. At least that's what the church mentioned in this article attempted.174.4.26.61 (talk) 08:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. I understand "human baggage" better now in the sense of human vs divine. I'll try to come up with some better wording. Willondon (talk) 20:46, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits on ''St. Thomas Evangelical Church''
Talk:Half guard

message: I understand how the x-guard is related to half guard, but I would say that it is more closely related to butterfly guard (use of hooks, entries, sweeps, etc.), so I am moving its section to the open guard section of the guard article.
--Aesopian 15:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-guard 
Talk:Science fact

message: Why not recreate this page and make it redirect to science? --Gray Porpoise 15:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be bold and do so. If anyone objects, they can take the necessary actions. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 14:41, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreate
Talk:Klaus Pringsheim Sr.

message: He had not one, but three children, compare the details in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Pringsheim_senior referencing https://www.lexm.uni-hamburg.de/object/lexm_lexmperson_00002788 (as reliable source), also regarding his homosexuality, which became public only through the Autiobiographiy of his son.
That 'son' Klaus Pringsheim Jr. wasn't his biological son, either, born long after Sr. and his wife separated, compare https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Pringsheim_junior. 
According the autobiography of the son, Man of the World, ISBN 9780889625846, opera singer Hans Winckelmann was his father. 2A02:908:2810:8780:3927:8321:B08A:44CC (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Robin Ray

message: I think it is probably incorrect to say that Robin Ray got the job of presenting Call My Bluff after Face the Music finished. Memory (unchecked) tells me that he chaired the former in the 1960s but the latter ran well into the 1970s. Will research further if anyone thinks it is worthwhile. Tim riley 16:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're quite correct and it's worth double-checking and amending. Deb 11:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done. He was founder-chairman of Call my Bluff in 1965 (eheu fugaces!). Face the Music began the following year. Thank you, Deb, for your encouragement.Tim riley 21:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of counties of Croatia

message: See Talk:County (Croatia); as of this date, no one has tried to sort out which portions of that apply to County (Croatia) and which to List of counties of Croatia. --Jerzy•t 16:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: While "Counties of Croatia" is a reasonable title for a Category, as an article title it was radically at odds with WP naming conventions.  In terms of WP style, the former article combined two topics that, despite their close relationship, are capable of clear separation. That separation aids users in finding the info they want: 
* County (Croatia) gives the information that is true of each county in Croatia, and conforms with the near-prime directive that titles should be singular nouns.
* List of counties of Croatia conforms to the naming convention for the primary group of topics whose scope is inherantly plural in nature, the enumerations of the members of a group. 
--Jerzy•t 16:44 & 16:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title
Talk:Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

message: should make for a nice picture. JFW | T@lk 16:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: It seems that inhibiting PAI-1 decreases adipocyte differentiation. . What would happen if you infused PAI-1 into mice - would you get the same results? JFW | T@lk 20:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in adipogenesis 

message: The picture is unlcear and clouds the explanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.5.196 (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture showing fibrinolysis etc 

message: Br J Haematol - doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09074.x JFW | T@lk 19:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:Sanguinarine

message: I have made an archive of the unusual edit that replaced all sorts of correct information with waht looks like a WP:copyvio taken from a source that mentions Viadent™.  There were other forensics that lead this writer to believe a lack of WP:NPOV was intended to bias away from the toxicity of sanuinarine, and toward health applications.  For example, sanguinarine was once included in toothpastes.Heathhunnicutt 16:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored an older version, which seems better to me.  The article could use some expansion still though. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weird edit of 28 June from New York City area

message: The following list of references was appended to the end of the article, but they are apparently not being used to support any article content, so I'm moving them here in case anyone would like to use them to improve the article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:30, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional references 

message: Given the toxic nature of sanguinarine, perhaps a link to the cansema page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cansema) would be worth adding?  Black salve, or cansema, frequently contains unregulated concentrations and if we a re going to cite papers that talk about the potential benefits of sanguinarine re apoptosis and cancer cells perhaps it is fair warning to readers to also discuss the damage that can be done to perfectly healthy skin with products containing sanguinarine.  I must admit, at first reading of this page as it stands I was under the impression it suggests sanguinarine is safe to use.
--124.181.192.208 (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest link to cansema page

message: Next, a methyl group is added to form N-methylcoclaurine.
Actually, 2 methyls must be added (at the O at top left & at the N).
96.88.198.77 (talk) 22:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biosynthesis
Talk:Oleksandriia

message: As per Ukraininan National system of transliteration, the name should be Oleksandriia.  I will move this if there are no objections.—Ëzhiki (Igel Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The 08:01, 30 January 2018 edit added "(During World War II)" before "On 6 August 1941" in the first sentence of the last paragraph of #1 History which currently starts "(During World War II) on 6 August 1941". Are the round brackets an error for something else? Perhaps anyway the sentence should start "On 6 August 1941 during World War II". Mcljlm (talk) 10:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  6 August 1941
Talk:Morayshire Railway

message: This article is listed in the above category. I believe this is incorrect because the category states There were a number of British railways that were not grouped into the 'Big Four' in 1923 and continued their independent existence separate from the 'mainline' network. This includes the railway companies that went on to become part of the London Underground network. The Morayshire Railway was absorbed by the GNoSR, thus becoming part of the "Big Four", Mjroots (talk) 11:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. That is supported by Awdry - Encyclopaedia of British Railway Companies. It amalgamated with the GNoSR 1 Oct 1880.Pyrotec (talk) 21:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Minor British railway companies]]

message: This article, and certainly the introduction, seems to indicate that the Craigellachie Bridge was built for the railway. As far as I'm aware this is false, and the bridge's date of construction certainly seems to confirm this (1812-14). Can anyone clarify exactly which bridge the railway used to cross the Spey at Craigellachie, or whether it indeed did? If the railway followed the line of the current Spey Way, then, from memory, it would be some distance from the Craigellachie Bridge and the Spey at Craigellachie. Leithp 14:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Craigellachie Bridge 
Talk:SADARM

message: Removed the past tense references - if it was used in combat in OIF then evidently at least some were put into service.  Riddley 16:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really clear if it's in service or not. I think they just had a few dozen of the original rounds in warehouses, and they happened to get shipped. I think once they were gone, then that was it. Megapixie 22:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's something like that - see this link  - Quote: "Due to affordability issues, the SADARM is currently not produced. Production could begin immediately if necessary." Riddley 22:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to everyone's contributions on expanding the stub I created! :D --Terrancommander 09:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (First comments)

message: I removed the section on program "cancellation" because obviously no such thing occurred.  The rounds have been given an M- rather than XM- designation, have been used in combat and have been doctrinally adopted to the force - techniques for use have been published in field manuals and so on.  Whether they are currently in production is irrelevant because specialized antiarmor rounds are useless in the current conflict - if we expected a stand-up fight against armored forces we would procure as many as necessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.131.176 (talk) 04:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: (section deletion)

message: So, this system uses smart EFP munitions?  Are they similar to the ones used in the CBU102 cluster munition, then?  Just curious.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.41.40.21 (talk) 10:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  smart EFP submunitions?
Talk:Mandorla

message: I am seeking images of a mandorla. --Spesek 20:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See :Image:Virgen de guadalupe.jpg for a pretty good idea of what one looks like.--Rockero 21:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks! I was taught that a Mandorla looks like 2 crossing/interlocking rings. --Spesek 15:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedia 

message: I took a bit of content from :de:Mandorla, but I don't have the energy to do a complete translation right now. I'll probably come back later and complete it. --Slashme (talk) 14:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a solid start. Great work! Majoreditor (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: German article

message: The two pages are about exactly same shape. - Altenmann >talk 19:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge from [[vesica piscis]] 

message: The idea to merge the Vesica piscis and Mandorla articles does not make sense. One is dealing with a geometrical form as understood by science and mathematics, the other with a theological form as understood by Christianity. Merging the two risks creating confusion between two diametrically different concepts that just happen to share a similar physical form.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.216.88.114 (talk) 09:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad idea 

message: As 83.216.88.114 said, the articles cover different aspects, even if a mandorla, in the context of art, should prove to be an element from a vesica piscis construction. Not that I don't see the resemblance, I just don't know if it is an established fact. Although a mandorla resemble the vesica piscis section it is not given they are congruent. Holiness is historically associated with radiance, which is what the mandorla illustrates. Of cause I recognize the numerous historical representations of the vesica piscis constructions, but the vesica piscis section has signature proportions which must be matched in the relevant works of art in order to say they are related. Furthermore, the name vesica piscis does not refer to the almond shaped section, but to the whole construction of two overlapping circles, and for that reason alone, merging the articles is out of the question. The proposal should be taken down. Carystus (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Against a merge
Talk:The Formula (2002 film)

message: Chris Hanel now lives (having recently moved to) Orlando, Florida.HamillianActor 02:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Green Guardsman

message: What the heck is all this about the "unpublished Iron Lantern #2?"  This sounds like speculation to me. --Joe Sewell 16:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of the Amalgam Comics made reference to metafictional issues that never really existed, since the Amalgam Comics series were all one-shots. However, these one-shots developed a sort of sub-continuity and mentioned things like what were going to happen in upcoming issues and previous ones like a real comic would. Meweight 05:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unpublished Editions? 

message: The character's background, as well as the name of his metafic debut, suggest more that he is based on Guy Gardner's Green Lantern persona than on Kyle Rayner's... Kouban 04:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guy Gardner?
Talk:Erwin Pröll

message: I've translated this article from the german-speaking wikipedia. You can read it here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_Pr%C3%B6ll
I know that it has not the right form for an person article and I will fix that today. --DocBrown 16:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:2006 FIFA World Cup finalists

message: This template should be better named , and the current  should be moved here.  --Pkchan 16:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First part done.  Second part requires an admin's help; move request filed here for this purpose.  --Pkchan 17:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of template 

message: What exactly is the point of this template? Are Brazil to have one for 1930, 34, 38, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 70, 74, 78, 82, 86, 90, 94, 98, 2002 and 06? That is quite frankly a BIG waste of page space, and quite ugly. I see that it's only been implemented for 2006 (thankfully), so it won't be to much effort to remove. Please explain to me why I shouldn't list it for deletion. Perhaps you think it has been overused. If this is the case perhaps a template is not needed? cheers, aLii 19:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree entirely. Doesn't add any value. I'd say delete them all. --Jameboy (talk) 23:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible deletion?
Talk:Sounion

message: An example of article bloat.  There are photos that have nothing to do with Sounion or are redundant. (We don't need a picture of the same place at sunset, even if it's popular with the tourists.)  Likewise, the article doesn't need details of legends which have nothing to do with Sounion nor of Byron's exploits elsewhere.  Also, "Fig." numbered photos, with "See Fig so-and-so" in the text, are unnecessary when the "figures" are right beside the text. J M Rice (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reject much of your critique. (A) Pictures:
# The picture of the Temple of Hephaestus is relevant because it is a much more intact exemplar of the same temple type and style as Sounion, built in the same period and probably by the same architect. It is therefore useful in giving the reader an idea of what the Sounion temple actually looked like, which is not evident from the standing remains
# The bronze statue of Poseidon is relevant because the Sounion temple was dedicated to that god and the shipwreck statue may well have been modelled on that cult statue (it was contemporary)
# The picture of Byron in local garb dates from the period when he was in Greece and wrote his engraving
# I can see no reason at all why readers should be deprived of the view of the Sounion sunset simply because you (arbitrarily) decide it's unnecessary. The sunset is mentioned in the text as a key attraction of the site and the picture is therefore relevant. (By the way, many of the readers of this article will be prospective tourists).
 
As regards the text, I see no problem with providing some context to statements in the text. I therefore propose to revert your pointless and damaging intervention in its entirety. PS: However, I accept that you are right about the figure numbers and will remove those from figures and text EraNavigator (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many irrelevant photos and too much irrelevant text 

message: The article says 
"70 kilometres (43 mi) southeast of Athens. ... It is 59.6 km away from Athens."
Which is it?Jpg1954 (talk) 20:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance from Athens
Talk:Gordon Griffith

message: In doing research for this article, I could not find concrete proof of what the S. stand for it. However, from what I did find, I believe it is likely that it stood for Sutherland. His father's middle name was Sutherland, and both he and his brother Graham used S. as an initial occasionally. In the 1920 census, his sister is referred to as "Southerland." This information is speculation and does not belong in the article. However, since people who read the article will likely be interested in what the S. stands for, I thought I would post what I found on the talk page. -JCarriker 16:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the S. stand for? 

message: This article is short, but please consider that it is well over twice the length of any bio that has existed before. -JCarriker 13:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article length 

message: This article has been at WP:GA/R discussion is at WP:GA/R#Gordon_Griffith.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  00:19, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA/R

message: As per this article's GA/R discussion, in a unanimous 4 to 0 decision, this article has been delisted, for several reasons. The most obvious one is there's no lead, an article can't comply with WP:LEAD if it doesn't have one. There were several other problems identified though, it might be faster just to read about them in the GA/R, archived here: Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 28#Gordon Griffith. Homestarmy 15:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA/R Results
Talk:Rhodes Boyson

message: I think I saw the episode of Have I Got News For You? described, but in my recollection, the guest in question was Teddy Taylor MP, not Rhodes Boyson. Or did the same thing happen twice in the same series? --Euromutt (talk) 07:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Have I Got News For You]]'' appearance

message: In the text he was born in Haslingden; in the infobox he was born in Manchester. Which is right? Alarics (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found him in Who's Who. It's Haslingden, not Manchester. I've corrected the infobox. Alarics (talk) 11:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he born?
Talk:Ob (river)

message: I'm pretty sure that the Russian name for the river has a hard sign and not a soft sign.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.81.131.158 (talk • contribs) .
:Sorry to disappoint you, but the soft sign is correct.  There are no words in the Russian language that would end in a hard sign anymore.—Ëzhiki (Igel Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Which ocean does the Ob river flow into?
* The Arctic Ocean. - Sikon (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which ocean does the Ob river flow into? 

message: Please disregard last question....sorry.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.140.80.250 (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoops.... 

message: How can this river be both the fourth longest in Russia, and the fifth longest in the world?
The River article describes it as the fifth longest in the world, while this article describes it as the fourth longest in Russia. 216.195.199.146 (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing statements in articles 

message: It is a mess with a length of Ob in the article. In the text there is 5,410km for Ob-Irtysh system, which seems to be conventional. But what is 2,962km in the description?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hatifnatter (talk • contribs) 11:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  length 

message: That map appears to be wrong. The name Angara is placed on what appears to be actually the Nizhnyaya Tunguska (Lower Tunguska) River. 2601:441:4680:3230:5509:77C1:9891:16D9 (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2019 (UTC
:Yes, I'm certain that's really the Lower Tunguska. My Oxford Atlas of the World calls it Nizhnyaya Tunguska. Also the river labeled "Anui" on this map is really the Alei according to [journal article]. 2601:441:4680:3230:5509:77C1:9891:16D9 (talk) 15:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, just noticing this now - apologies for the error, and I'll fix it ASAP. Shannon [ Talk ] 04:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Has an Error 

message: The article proudly states the Gulf is the longest estuary in the World. 
The entire Thames estuary (as wide) is taken as part of its length. The Ob Gulf clearly is not as it is written.  So either we need to state the Gulf is not considered part of its length by Russian geographers who do not mirror the practice of some other rivers (more politely); or we need to omit the fact; or we need to rewrite the length bit. With the Gulf the Ob, itself, is about .- Adam37 Talk 08:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed I stand guilty like most of the public in scanning a tiny bit and reading. But it is now much better than the secondary phrase "while the Ob is only 2,538 km (1,577 mi) long" which is just unhelpful.  But still consider whether all consider the Gulf part of the Ob.- Adam37 Talk 08:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Hiliarious fact contradiction