Talk:Roman Egypt

message: I think this can be included in the article. http://www.hinduonnet.com/2007/11/21/stories/2007112158412400.htm Maybe someone can get more information on the subject. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tamil pottery

message: Israel has writhdraw from sinai pannesula since 1982.84.228.92.54 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  how is it today part of israel? 

message: Please Help with restoring original title of the section "Christian Egypt" --ROO BOOKAROO (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring previous paragraph title 

message: Text currently says : "oppressive taxation led to a revolt in 139, of the native Egyptians, which was suppressed only after several years of fighting. This Bucolic War, led by one Isidorus, caused great damage to the economy"
This reads to me as if the Bucolic War began in 139AD. 
However the entry for Isidorus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isidorus  says that he was *born* in 139AD  and the Bucolic War occurred in 172-173.
I haven't yet been able to find any details of a tax revolt in Egypt in 139, but there seems to be something that ins't right in this entry. I don't know emough about it to be able to correct it, so I am just flagging this up for clarification. 
 82.71.104.222 (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bucolic War 

message: And if we wanted to be technically correct (the best kind of correct), what would be our alternatives?  The only one I see is to move this to Aegyptus and demote the article already there to Aegyptus (mythology)  Laura Scudder | talk 22:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The preferred nomenclature would, I believe, be 'prefecture' following the title of the governor of the territory. Wagrid (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is province in the title if it wasn't a province? 

message: Actually,a little part of the Provincia Aegypti is probably a part of Libya now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.16.162.231 (talk) 04:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libya 

message: This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. Help me please --👀Gremista.32 (talk) 22:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Egypt (Roman province) →  – :This page has been through a number of moves, all in the 2000s. They were:
*Aegyptus Province → Aegyptus (Roman province) @ 15:13, 6 April 2006‎ by Panairjdde~enwiki
*Aegyptus (Roman province) → Ægyptus @ 00:42, 8 April 2007‎ by Whytecypress
*Ægyptus → History of Roman Egypt @ 06:44, 19 September 2007‎‎ by Anthony Appleyard
*History of Roman Egypt → Egypt (Roman province) @ 11:55, 19 April 2009‎ by EraNavigator
"Egypt (Roman province)" has obtained ever since 2009. However, none of these moves resulted in what is probably the best two options, though the original name, "Aegyptus Province" came close. "Aegyptus" is possibly the best place for the article, but that would have to displace the current Aegyptus to Aegyptus (mythology). The other best candidate is "Roman Egypt" and in my view this article should just move there and avoid the brackets, like Roman Gaul, Roman Britain, Roman Syria, etc. Roman Egypt is presently a redirect though, so I can't do it myself. GPinkerton (talk) 07:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 December 2020 

message: The lead has gotten too long. We do not need to mention, e.g., Scythae Iustiniani. Srnec (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , probably true, though at present I have much more planned for the article; there are whole topics that go unmentioned that will need some coverage in the lead, which I tried to hint at using the information in the brief dictionary entries I used for finding a suitably terse but complete academic treatment to work out a summary from. I am in medias res with this article, and in the fulness of time all things will be made well ... GPinkerton (talk) 01:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: in 153, a riot in Alexandria killed the praefectus Aegypti.. As I check the List of governors of Roman Egypt, there is no mention of that event (Peluba (talk) 12:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , I also checked that list, and either that list is incorrect, or there is some dispute as to whether it happened that year or the next. Lucius Munatius Felix is the relevant prefect, but his article too fails to mention this. I'm fairly sure it happened though, and probably in 153. GPinkerton (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  153 riot in  Alexandria