lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lugarno, New South Wales

message: I knew that the name derived from the cities of Lugano and Locarno in Italian Switzerland. Does anybody could check it?
it was actually from Lugano, also it wasn't ash wednesday fires that happend in 1983 and in Victoria/SA not Lugarno.--203.166.254.24 07:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lugarno was green-belt residential until 1966 or 67. Many houses along Forest Rd were built after ww2 and provided to returned service men using low interest loans. Most blocks along Forest Rd were 5ac; double width and ran from the top of the ridge to the bottoms of the gullies. The Hurstville Council changed the zoning to residential about mid-67. For a year or two before then, councillors (many seemed to be real eastate agents) were wise to the future re-zoning, and harangued many residents to sell their land to them cheaply.220.240.228.205 (talk) 05:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land released 1960? 
Template talk:Guns N' Roses

message: http://web.gunsnroses.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081123&content_id=a1&vkey=news&fext=.jsp <-- From official website. Guess that cleared that up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.6.141 (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin and Brain OFFICIALLY Out 

message: Brain's emailed people from his official website saying that he's in GN'R and they'll be touring this summer.
http://www.heretodaygonetohell.com/board/index.php?topic=55898.0
Sadistik (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't be too sure about Mantia.

message: No other band links all articles that involve members of G N' R. Even The Beatles don't link in the template to Ringo's All Star Band! I removed all but side-projects and supergroups, and even those shouldn't be linked. Bsd987 14:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related Articles 

message: I added both Del James and West Arkeen to the related articles since both of them are definitely Guns related. If this is out of line, sorry in advance. Fullmetaljacuzzi 21:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Del James/West Arkeen 

message: I added a new feature to the template: typing  will not place the page that the template is trancluded on, into :Category:Guns N' Roses. Typing just  will add the page to the category. –sebi 03:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optional category
Talk:SooperDooperLooper

message: , can you please provide the sources which you know to exist which indicate notability for this topic? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the first looping coaster on the U.S. East Coast and only the second ever in the US. Its construction and its opening were both reported by non-local papers. The Philadelphia Inquirer also reported on the coaster one year after it opened. These were literally just the first few results I found on newspapers.com. The Baltimore Sun later reported on how the coaster was used to teach local students. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the message was meant to convey that the article itself does not have enough information to make it notable. If you have sources, then they need to be incorporated into the wiki page. Also, despite what the park claimed and sources have subsequently repeated, the whole "first looping coaster on the east coast" claim is highly debatable. Riverside and Kings Dominion both opened looping coasters in 1977, and both are farther east than Hersheypark. Granted, they were shuttle loops, but looping coasters nonetheless. Furthermore, it was not the second looper to open in the U.S., that record goes to Cedar Point's Corkscrew which opened on May 15, 1976, just one week after Magic Mountain's Revolution and a full year before SDL. I also have a hard time thinking of Hersheypark as being associated with the east coast when it is more than 160 miles to the nearest coastline and you have to enter another state. No portion of Pennsylvania touches the Atlantic ocean.—JlACEer (talk) 20:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good point. I was planning to add these sources to the article later, but I was basically responding to Horse Eye's Back's message, which seems to have been prompted by this edit of mine. I see what you mean regarding the looping coaster record - I forgot that Corkscrew also had a loop and, in fact, I actually forgot about all the other looping coasters. If we're really being precise, the first looping coaster on the East Coast is Flip Flap Railway, which opened all the way back in 1895. Even if SDL was on the East Coast, it wasn't anywhere near the first. Honestly, I listed these sources primarily to prove that SDL was, in fact, mentioned in multiple secondary sources. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Late Night Tales

message: Is the April 24th release date correct? No sign of the album's release...
::I e-mailed Azuli records and got a reply today - they haven't got a definite date for it, but said it looked like being around the end of June 06. Will edit articles to reflect this. Gram 14:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: E-mailed Azuli again - they said it's now due for release on 11 Sept. I asked if it was due to clearance issues, but they didn't say. Also asked if any further Late Night Tales albums are due, and they said they have people in mind, but no definites yet. Will edit the article to reflect updated date. Gram 17:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: The fair use rationale for the main image in this article was disputed, so I have clarified the rationale.
As for the gallery, the article does not discuss the specific albums in sufficient detail to warrant the individual album cover images here. The article is about Late Night Tales as a series, not about the specific albums, so those images will be restricted to their own specific articles. I will therefore replace the gallery with a wiki-table format, so we can still link to the specific albums, without displaying the images. Gram123 15:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: *:Image:LateNightTales Lindstrom.jpg
*:Image:LateNightTales DavidShrigley.jpg
These two images have been orphaned as the gallery has now been removed and this was the only place they appeared. To stop them from being deleted, album articles for them both. Alternatively, if no one can be bothered to create the articles (e.g. me, for the time being), then we can let the pics get deleted and upload again if and when required. Gram123 14:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned images

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Mine: Adam Freeland
Basically, the state of the entire series of Back to Mine, DJ-Kicks, and Late Night Tales is such that if these articles were deleted, all those would be as well.  The discussion here may not set any precedent but if these articles are deleted, those will probably be next.  Feel free to express your opinion. - McCart42 (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of compilation series
Talk:Salutary neglect

message: I think we need some citation or supporting evidence for the 'three periods of salutary neglect' paragraph.  First, England began restricting trade in navigation acts in 1651 with further consolidation after the restoration in 1660.  Perhaps it's wise to just delete this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.210.85 (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three periods? 

message: WP:V
There seems to be debate here about what terms are correct and the applicability of them.  My concern is that with all this discussion there are no cited sources.  Technically an editor could fly through these articles and delete the content.  Please see the above regarding the verifiability of facts on wikipedia.  Alan.ca 18:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing facts 

message: Salutary Neglect is a specific term that retrospectively came to be applied to the American policy. That is worthy of a separate article. If a general Benign Neglect article wants wo wikilink to this one as a specific example, it can go right ahead. If any more references are needed beside the Burke speech itself, there are hundreds of American history books to choose from.Hughespj 13:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Salutory Neglect into Salutary Neglect

message: -I agree with all who say not to merge.  they are different things.  salutary neglect is part of benign neglect so you can put this in that but not that in this, if you know what i mean "if it aint broke don't fixit"  i aint broke~`~ opps!! it aint broke!!!
I have to agree with the guy two below me. It doesn't seem logical to merge them. ~
-Disagree, don't merge.
Yeah, don't merge
do NOT merge them. they are not the same thing.
Samz0r 05:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do NOT Merge

message: "Salutary (benign) neglect was an undocumented, though long-standing, British policy of avoiding strict enforcement of parliamentary laws meant to keep the American colonies obedient to Great Britain."  This sentence can be better punctuated so that its meaning were clearer.
September 25, 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiz0floyd (talk • contribs) 21:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing Sentence

message: I've always understood salutary neglect to incorporate other related concepts such as a car driving up to an intersection with no other traffic but stop signs and coming to a "rolling stop" and going through. Unless I'm wrong I think this deserves some investigation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.181.250.232 (talk) 07:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded Definitions 

message: I've decided to remove the small paragraph towards the end of the page that was a grammatical mess, didn't make any sense, and was rather irrelevant.  I think what was trying to be said there was adequately explained in the second paragraph and much better.  Feel free to add it back in if you disagree Greepish (talk) 08:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Took out the confusing paragraph.
Talk:List of street punk bands

message: A user has been edit-warring for deleting this entry:
* Gabba (musician), a guitarist in the 1980s streetpunk band Chaos UK, now in the 2006 band ASBO Youth
(whose code also embedded a reference links to http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:iif1zfaheh6k~T1 for source and notability) from the disambiguation page Gabba, arguing that it's not notable enough to ever have a Wikipedia article, and thus to be listed as a redlink on a dab page. You can provide opinion and information (positive or negative) about it at the discussion page Talk:Gabba so as to help sort it out.
Thanks,
-- 62.147.112.36 14:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability of Chaos UK and guitarist Gabba? 

message: I changed the name to List of streetpunk bands, because that's the proper spelling.Spylab 13:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Streetpunk]], not Street Punk

message: Anti-Flag's earlier stuff can maybe be considered Streetpunk, but Agnostic Front is definitely just Hardcore/Crossover Thrash. At least Agnostic Front should definitely be taken off.
Wall Screamer (talk) 16:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agnostic Front and Anti-Flag? 

message: There are a few bands listed without articles, meaning they aren't reliably sourced yet.--Lexein (talk) 14:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we keeping only bands/entities with articles?
Talk:Ecophagy

message: The reason is the following excerpt from ecophagy article:
"However, the word "ecophagy" is now applied more generally in reference to any event—nuclear war, the spread of monoculture, massive species extinctions—that might fundamentally alter the planet." Because of that quote, you can't merge the articles. You could edit this article to focus on the now more general reference, but not merge with the specific goo article. Beam 16:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  REMOVAL OF MERGE TAG 

message: However, ecophagy is highly inprobable because bacteria and viruses are the perfect example of self-replicating organisms. They have been on Earth since the beginning of life on the planet, but still haven't managed to destroy it.
On another note, the idea of "grey goo" was one of these ideas that was mentioned off-hand by someone (not even anyone professionally related to the field) and the media grabbed it and ran with it. The general consensus in the nano-science now is that a "grey goo" phenomena is almost entirely gobble-dee-gook and it not a plausible possibility, even should such nano scale engineering become a reality. You will be hard-pressed to find a reputable scientist that will support the concept.
I would support the removal of any mention of "grey-goo" from any serious article about nanoscience.178.15.151.163 (talk) 11:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably original research - moved from article 
Category talk:British Anglicans

message: Am I the only one who thinks this whole category is ridiculous? Especially English Anglicans? Rather like having a list of Israeli Jews or Roman Catholic residents of Vatican City.
:Well Not all Anglicans are English nor are all English people Anglicans. Dwscomet (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Silly
Talk:Karam Shah al-Azhari

message: This article needs to be cleaned up drastically and shortened. Stifle (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hints do not count for sources. Zionlove2 (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they do not, but you don't need sources to avoid an A7 speedy or indeed proof of notability, the article just needs to assert why it may be notable (in this case being a justice of the supreme court of Pakistan clearly meets this requirement) and this does not need to be sourced.  I've left a fuller reply on your talk page. Dpmuk (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

text: You can provide the following reference
 http://www.ljcp.gov.pk/Menu%20Items/Publications/Reports%20of%20the%20LJCP/reports/FederalShariatCourt2003.pdf
His name is listed seven in the list of justices of Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan. This is an official report of Federal Shariat Court and is very much verifiable and acceptable.--Tahaferozee (talk) 19:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A7 Tagging
Talk:Railways in Guyana

message: What were gauge(s)?    Tabletop (talk) 01:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed, what were they? Peter Horn User talk 01:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauge 
Talk:Saskatoon Police Service

message: It should be noted that the David Milgaard Inquiry has not yet released it's findings and no member of the police service, past or present has been found guilty of any wrong doing.
* Fair enough.  Go nuts!  Sven Erixon 08:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article has been mentioned in a CBC News story: 
:Added  template for this at the top. --Drm310 (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the news 

message: Due to the recent news items and some of the user names in the article's edit history, it seems reasonable to warn editors here about our rules on paid editing and Conflict of Interest editing.
If you are being paid by the Saskatoon Police Service or its agents, according to our terms of service you must declare that you are a paid editor.  See WP:Paid
If you have another conflict of interest on this article you should also declare that status.  See WP:COI.  Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Added  above to reinforce this point. --Drm310 (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice on Paid and COI editing

message: The content below has no source. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we are striving for it to be a reliable one. For Wikipedia to be reliable, claims need a WP:Reliable source.OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 01:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced content relocated here

message: The table is not formatted correctly in the structure section of the article. I can't seem to find the problem. Can you please take a look into it. Thanks! Daylen (talk) 03:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a mix of div-column templates (eg. ) and regular column templates (e.g. ) being used, which made a bit of a mess. I think it should now look the way you want it to. Yunshui 雲水 07:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table formatting issue
Talk:Ticlio

message: In the table "Highest train stations", the elevation of Ticlio is given as 4,829 m (15,843 ft). 
In the article "Ticlio", the elevation is given as 4,758 m (15,610 ft). The latter is probably true, 
because the highest spot of the FCCA main line, inside Galera tunnel, is 4784 m high, 
and the stations Galera and Ticlio at the entrances of Galera tunnel are lower than this. - 
According to Brian Fawcett, "Railways of the Andes", first published 1963, the elevation of Ticlio is 15,608 ft; the highest railway station "La Cima" on the Morococha branch line is at 15,806 ft; Morococha itself is at 14,888 ft; and a mine siding from La Cima reaches 15,845 ft. - 
I suggest to make a correction in the table "Highest train stations", leaving the elevation figures as they are, and replacing "Ticlio, on the rail line Lima-Huancayo" by "La Cima, on the rail line Ticlio-Morococha". Unfortunately, the Morococha branch line, albeit still existing, is interrupted by landslides and out of use. - Riggenbach (talk) 15:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation of Ticlio
Talk:Open Heart Zoo

message: Is this album really meant to have an initial ‘Ø’? Does anyone have any official sources? Doremítzwr 14:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After waiting almost a month for citations, I have reverted Foxé’s vandalism — the only sites that used ‘Ø’ for the initial ‘O’ (according to Google) were two Wikipedia pages, and two Answers.com pages (the latter stating that it had copied Wikipedia). Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 00:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Human Fly (character)

message: Parts of this article list 'compound eyes' as a power - for those of us unfamiliar with the character, what actual beneficial effect does this have?  Thanks. --Irrevenant [ talk ] 01:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is 'compound eyes' a power? 
Talk:Gaussian minimum-shift keying

message: hai friends i want know why the AM waves are able to travel for a long distance rathe than the FM waves MY E-MAIL ID IS siva_marvel@yahoo.co.in
::This issue is talked about here.  AM uses lower frequencies meaning that the waves travel further, but have less "penetration" through obstacles.  FM has greater penetration (meaning that it is less affected by a concrete wall for instance).  AM radio is also capable of skipping.  Cacophony 00:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another thing to keep in mind is that the sun ionizes the ionosphere in the upper atmosphere, causing it to be a electromagnetic "mirror".  As AM waves travel upward, and due to their lower frequency, they bounce off this mirror and allow the waves to travel further.  See here and here for examples. 12.166.203.254 14:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: No.  Those are seperate topics which should have seperate articles.  No merging needed. Falkonry 14:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Rollout photography

message: This article has been tagged  WikiProject Mesoamerica and yet it is about a photographic technique for which the term 'slit-scan' is more usually used. It is perhaps a bid to claim authorship or invention of a technique covered in the article Slit-scan photography, which itself could do with some of the information included here. A merge of the two articles is appropriate and a redirect from 'Rollout photography' will take searches there. Do you agree? Jamesmcardle(talk) 03:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, as both the mechanisms and the purpose seem quite different to me, so I think that readers would be better served by having them on separate pages. Klbrain (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 10:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merge with Slit-scan photography
Talk:Basque Country

message: I have tried to turn this into a POV-free page explaining three different Basque Countries (=Pais Vasco=Pays Basque). The talk pages of all these pages are still confused after a series of coarse moves and redirects. Mtiedemann 15:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pardon, je ne parle pas très bien anglais. Je crois qu'on ne doit pas écrire Euskal Herría, parce que c'est le nom avec qui appelle les nationalistes basques au Pay Basque Franças, Espagnol et Navarra
:This is a good point, why does this article refer to the Basque regions as being part of Euskal Herria, the individual country that Basque nationalists hope to establish? Gtpod (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they are parts of Euskal Herria, the historical Basque Country. Húsönd 19:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Euskal Herria is a historical self-given popular toponym that means Basque Country. It pre-dates Basque nationalism. You may refer to the neologism Euskadi possibly. The term Euskal Herria was even used by Francoists (at least that's what some of them have told me) - of course they used it only as a pretext to denigrate the aranism Euzkadi (modernly spelled Euskadi but still a neologism), that has no such deeply ingrained historical basis. --Sugaar (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Euskal Herria 

message: I thought it was fair to add Navarre to the list, since much of the Basque diaspora of the USA have their roots there.
—- Biscay 11:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added 'Navarre' because of the Basque diaspora original from there. 

message: Otsoa, I assume this is just some misunderstanding. A dab page does not make any claims about the currentness or antiquity of a name but it serves to direct people to the right content page. G/B/A were historically the Vascongadas, hence their inclusion in the list. It does not claim in any shape or form that that's the current name. The Euskadi may have been intented as all sorts of things by Arana, but the point is that in practice, Euskadi primarily refers to the EAE, not the EAE+N+Ipar. Akerbeltz (talk) 14:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  constituent parts