Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian football

message: this is the begining of a great wikiproject that will improve everything pertaining to the cfl Burnqq 04:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It begins

message: There is now a proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#North American football players for a group which would work specifically on articles relating to biographies of individual players, coaches, and other related individuals. Any parties interested in working with such a group are encouraged to add their names there, so we can see if there is enough interest to start the group in earnest. Thank you. John Carter 13:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed football player biography work group 

message: :Category:Canadian Football League templates should prove quite useful to this project. heqs ·:. 16:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: See related discussion on categories here and here. heqs ·:. 17:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFD notice 

message: I have categorized all of the previously unranked Canadian football articles as of 23 November 2007, but some of them are lists and templates.  While the WPCFL template recognizes them as proper rankings, the existing categories containing the articles do not and thus keep all articles ranked Template or List in Category:Unassessed Canadian football articles.  I think we could benefit greatly from two new categories, Category:Template-class Canadian football articles and Category:List-class Canadian football articles.  I would be more than willing to create them myself if someone could teach me how to do it.
TFCforever (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 20:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template and List rankings for articles 

message: How does Wayne Gretzky fit into this project? -Royalguard11(T·R!) 19:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Former owner of Toronto Argonauts. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you learn something new everyday on Wikipedia. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 19:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gretzky? 

message: I don't understand the Esk's "community ownership"!  What does it mean?  I'm in the community?  Do I own them? Kevlar67 (talk) 19:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered by own question.  See the new Ownership section on Edmonton Eskimos.Kevlar67 (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community ownership 

message: I have developed a suggested WikiProject Canadian football/Player pages format page to help improve and standardise player articles. It is drawn largely from WikiProject Ice Hockey/Player pages format, Template:Biography, and some of the recognised good Canadian football, American football, and sport biography articles.
Comments, suggestions, and editing welcome. Once agreed on, we can suggest following it on the WikiProject Canadian football page. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player pages format 

message: *:Safety (American football) → :Safety (football position) — I believe the disambiguation (American football) is rather unclear as it could also mean the Safety (football score) and the same position is also in Canadian football. I suggest (football position). Please add your thoughts at Talk:Safety (American football)#Requested move. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  move Safety (American football) → Safety (football position) 

message: Hello, this article, which falls under the scoope of your project, is currently listed as a Featured Article. I felt that there is sufficient reason to revisit this assessment, so I have listed it for a Featured Article Review. My preference is to see the concerns addressed and have the article remain at its current level, but some work its needed. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Wayne Gretzky. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wayne Gretzky]] Featured Article Review 

message: CFL currently redirects to Canadian Football League. There is a proposal to change CFL into a dab page. Please discuss at Talk:CFL (disambiguation) . DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFL (disambiguation) 

message: The Wikipedia:WikiProject College football project is having a discussion of college football player notability in reference to professional football leagues.  All members of your project are invited to join in on the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Players notability expansion?.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability discussion invitation 

message: This CFL player for the SK Roughrides has had a speedy deletion tag.  It was created by a new user to wikipedia.  Can anyone help with the article.  Some citations have been added.  Kind Regards.  SriMesh | talk 05:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Anton McKenzie]]

message: There is a discussion going on at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2008/June#Cat:Canadian football biography stubs regarding redistributing the Canadian football-bio-stubs category. DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub sorting proposal 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: You are hereby invited to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability for discussion of notability of college football players.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An invitation 

message: Currently, 878 articles are assigned to this project, of which 94, or 10.7%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of .) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place the following template on your project page:
:{{}}
If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles flagged for cleanup 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Canadian football 

message: There are (at present count) 58 pages up for deleletion in AfD Discussions at the College Football Project.  Since your project is listed as a related project, your project members may wish to participate.  This large volume is really more than we can handle in such a short period of time and the project asks for your input.  Please review Articles & Pages being considered for deletion immediately.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Large number of AfD's in progress

message: Hi everyone!
SriMesh and I have taken over running Portal:Canada, as it was being woefully neglected. With the Grey Cup coming up, I'd love to have a series of Cup-related articles featured on the Portal from Nov 16-23, with the actual Grey Cup article on the 23. I don't know a lot about football, but some suggestions:
*Articles on the teams playing
*Biographies on notable players
*The Canadian football article, and/or Canadian Football League
*Vanier Cup (already in rotation on the portal, but will be scheduled for the day)
*Featured Images related to the game (or at least really good pictures)
*DYK hooks related to Canadian Football 
;Helping out is really easy! Just follow the links below.
Nominate new content       		       		
I want to nominate a new...		       		
{|cellpadding="5" style="color:black;text-align:center;"		       		
Image                      		Article		DYK
Biography                  		       		
I know we list GA-class as a requirement for articles, and I'd really love it if all the articles nominated could be at least that level, but I understand that time is a factor. If you have any questions, please post at the Portal Talk page.  
Thanks!!
[ roux ] [x] 16:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Canada needs YOU! 

message: I have created an infobox for active American football players, that is inclusive of all the major football leagues. It includes entry and debut information on af2, Arena Football League, National Football League, oh, and the Canadian Football League. As well, it contains draft information for the NFL and CFL. It also includes a place to list the players high school, which then has a place for awards, and highlights. Then the college section is the same as before, except it has it's own highlights and awards section. As does the professional section (originally the default section). It also includes six stat labels for the AFL, NFL, CFL and af2, in alphabetical order. As well as, an expanded external stats link section, to decrease the number of links in the external section. Not to mention the external links section is placed in alphabetical order, for the most part, not to mention a neatly organized hour glass shape, which was mostly by luck. Crash Underride 18:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's laudable but one already exists at Template:Infobox gridiron football person and it is also able to include coaches and administrators and those who move on from one position to another. I suppose (by looking at your contributions since you kept the name a secret) that you speak of Template:Infobox American football active in which case I have one minor and one other major concern. The minor concern is that this project is unconcerned with American football but rather Canadian football so it is a rather unfortunate name if it's to include players of Canadian football. Secondly, and more importantly, I presume that this is another two-infobox schemes(1/2) where you have to completely change the infobox to Infobox retired when they're no longer active then switch back again to active when they decide to return to playing. That is a preposterous idea, in my opinion, and I cannot support such a system. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, a) I didn't keep it a secret, I forgot to put it in that's all (it's Template:Infobox American football active), and b) American football and Canadian football are basically the same thing. You have players going from the NFL to the CFL all the time. Don't make me bring up Ricky Williams, John Avery, or Warren Moon. Also, I hadn't thought about a retired one. I have one at Template:Infobox Arenaretired that has places for their positions as a player as well as a coach, so in the grand scheme it doesn't have too be changed. Crash Underride 19:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling it a secret was my lame attempt at being humorous. While it's true that players move between the leagues and that the sports have many similarities, it's not the same and you cannot call Canadian football American football. It's only a minor problem since the name can be easily changed or a redirect made. My big concern is not about making a retired infobox, it is about having different infoboxes at all for active and retired. The infobox should not have to replaced when the player retires or moves on to coaching. What is wrong with Template:Infobox gridiron football person? No offence, but it seems superior to both NFLactive and American football active to me as a generic football infobox for players, coaches, and admins in any of the leagues. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As you said, that's your opinion. And mine is, personally, it's bland and doesn't look good at all. Oh, on a side note, could people please take a look at players from West Virginia University that play in the CFL, such as Lance Frazier? People write as the University of West Virginia, which is not the name of the school. Crash Underride 23:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for correcting that. I will try to remember to watch for that. I corrected one passing reference at 2008 Hamilton Tiger-Cats season but I don't see any more. DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I had to correct ALOT for the Lance Frazier article, it had like three or four that were wrong. lol Yeah the University of West Virginia is different from West Virginia University. The UWV was a board of education or something like that and WVU is the acutal school. Crash Underride 15:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  All inclusive infobox 

message: ATTENTION WP:ATHLETE is being re-written.  There is a very big discussion here.  The re-writing is focusing mainly on amateur athletes.  You may well wish to participate.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Notability Discussion 

message: :Category:Players with NFL and CFL careers is being considered for deletion. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Players with NFL and CFL careers

message: Please check out and comment on the newly proposed WP:Naming conventions (sportspeople). DoubleBlue (talk) 02:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions (sportspeople) 

message: CFL attendance has been nominated for deletion via WP:PROD by someone. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CFL attendance

message: This needs to be updated more often that last updates came in 2007, I mean just updated it, but can't guarerntee I'll update it every week.--Giants27 TC 18:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Canadian football]] 

message: Please stop by and voice your opinion in the ongoing discussion on the use of team colors in sports infoboxes.--2008Olympianchitchat 06:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on use of team colors in sports infoboxes

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Hi all. I'm going through and updating importance levels for Canadian articles. This article needs a lot of work... it's largely unreferenced and reads as a play-by-play on TV. Is that normal for football articles? Anyway, I've assessed its importance as Medium; I think it needs a fair bit of attention, but could easily hit GA/A status pretty easily.  Cheers! //roux   22:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention needed at [[93rd Grey Cup]] 

message: Anyone know a reliable source for CFL statistics from the mid 1990s? I couldn't immediately find anything online. Thanks, Zagalejo^^^ 07:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately there is no one fantastic site. There's stuff from cfl.ca saved by the Internet Archive at http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.cfl.ca/CFLStats/home.html but only from 1996 on. http://www.cflapedia.com/ is quite good but organised by player, incomplete, and, though I find it reliable, its ranking on the Reliable sources scale would not necessarily be high. There are, of course, the CFL's Facts, Figures, and Records books but, depending on your precise need, you may need to find one from that era. Actually one of my next steps was to start a resource page (Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian football/Playbook) that would have tips like this but I've real life tasks that I've decided I must tackle first. DoubleBlue (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, thanks for the reply. I was hoping there'd be something like pro-football-reference.com. Oh, well... :) Zagalejo^^^ 21:29, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFL statistics 

message: I have nominated  for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. DoubleBlue (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of [[:Category:Canadian Football League free agents]] 

message: As you may know, we currently have 400 good article nominations, with a large number of them being in the sports and recreation section. As such, the waiting time for this is especially long, much longer than it should be. As a result of this, I am asking each sports-related WikiProject to review two or three of these nominations. If this is abided by, then the backlog should be cleared quite quickly. Some projects nominate a lot but don't review, or vice-versa, and following this should help to provide a balance and make the waiting time much smaller so that our articles can actually get reviewed! Wizardman 23:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been wanting to do something like this maybe, but haven't gotten around to it. I'll check it out eventually.--Giants27 (c|s) 00:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAN backlog reduction - Sports and recreation 

message: has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. DoubleBlue (talk) 19:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of [[:Category:African American players of Canadian football]] 

message: I have propose renaming :Category:British Columbia Lions to :Category:BC Lions and similarly the subcats :Category:British Columbia Lions coaches and :Category:British Columbia Lions players. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. DoubleBlue (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking about suggesting this a few days ago, but forgot all about it. I'd say it makes a lot of sense considering the main article is located at BC Lions and not British Columbia. Plus it's the WP:COMMONNAME.--Giants27(c|s) 19:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming of British Columbia Lions categories 

message: FYI, there is a rather neglected redirect page for Oskee wee wee to the target page The Oski Yell. I've categorized the redirect and added to the target page a bit to try and get some CFL visibility and context. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oskee wee wee

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: There is discussion ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:BIO#RFC:_WP:Athlete_Professional_Clause_Needs_Improvement debating possible changes to the WP:ATHLETE notability guideline.  As a result, some have suggested using WP:NSPORT as an eventual replacement for WP:ATHLETE.  Editing has begun at WP:NSPORT, please participate to help refine the notability guideline for the sports covered by this wikiproject. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Notability 

message: Hello.  I recently opened an RfC on sorting out the titles of the "Safety" articles, both for the position and the scoring play.  Since no one has yet responded, I am notifying potentially interested WikiProjects and inviting comment in order to build consensus. Please go here: Talk:Safety_(American_football)#RfC:_.22Safety.22_article_titles to comment. –Grondemar 21:03, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on "Safety" article titles 

message: The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope.  There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 32,665 as of May 16.  A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both :Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.
Your Project's list can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian football/Unreferenced BLPs.  As of May 17 you have approximately 172 articles to be referenced. The list of all other WikiProject UBLPs can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects. 
Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated.  If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page.  Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons 

message: Hello, i'm looking for input from the Wikiprojects on all the Football codes so we can get a standardized wording for each brand of the sport. Doc Quintana (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC On Differing Football Nomenclature

message: For what it's worth, I just created the stubiest of stubs for the Canadian Football League Players' Association. I see there's no field that would allow me to include it in the current CFL template, however. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did find a way to add it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: CFLPA

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Canadian football articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian football articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatchewan Roughriders all time records and statistics. Your comments would be welcome.  Eastmain (talk • contribs)  20:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatchewan Roughriders all time records and statistics 

message: The question being ask is Should football be WP:DAB'd for all codes when the code is first mentioned in the intro?  Gnevin (talk) 09:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC [[Talk:Football#RFC:_Association_football]]

message: Unless there are any objections, it is probably time to add a "current" parameter to , providing a link to the current season article, similar to what is used on , , . I ask because a bot was recently starting to enforce strict rules per WP:CET on the use of  and the other Temporal templates. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a "current" parameter to [[Template:CFL team]] 

message: at Football in the United States it was noted that we are missing an article about Canadian football in the United States. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian football in the United States 

message: Is the Sherwood Schwarz linked from Template:TorontoArgosOwner in fact Sherwood Schwartz?   I just can't figure it out. - TB (talk) 10:56, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed:  Toronto Argonauts owners 

message: Per the note I left on the article talk page, this article's author claims to be its subject. I'd be grateful if you experts could take a look at its notability and any POV issues stemming from the COI. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Treamelle Taylor]] 

message: How can I find out Aaron Lockett (gridiron football)'s CFL career stats and teams?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. this article suggests that Lockett should be on .--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why isn't he listed here.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is that he predates the newest version of the CFL's website, though I've never heard of him before. That list is nowhere nearly extensive, as the CFL in its current form has been going since 1954, thus it should have thousands of players on that list to be totally correct. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 03:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Aaron Lockett (gridiron football)]] 

message: I've nominated the ten CFL team seasons navboxes for deletion, because all they do is duplicate a section of the team navbox. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 20#CFL team seasons navboxes. 117Avenue (talk) 03:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFL team seasons navboxes 

message: I have created the page Comparison of Canadian football and rugby union, but unfortunately it contains too many references to American football. I was hoping that some people from this project could help improve it. I'm not really au fait with the precise differences between CF and AF, other than pitch size... Many thanks --MacRusgail (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be good to have such a comparison with Australian football as well. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 22:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Comparison of Canadian football and rugby union]] 

message: I notice there's no article for gridiron football stadium, since Canadian Football and American Football have specialized football stadia, this might be a useful article to have. As Canadian and American football stadiums have very similar design concerns, a unified article for both codes would be better than separate articles for each (ie. Canadian football stadium & American football stadium ) though such redirects should exist. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 22:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Football stadium]]

message: Hey guys, I'm not sure how many of you are aware, but for the past couple of years there have been attempts to get the result of the Grey Cup on the front page of Wikipedia in the "In the News" section, but each time it has been rejected due to the article not being up to snuff. Things like playoff game summaries or a lack of prose have been major reasons why the game has been rejected.
I figured this year it would be a good idea to bring this up ahead of the game in case there are any football experts who would be capable of expanding the 100th Grey Cup article to a standard which would be acceptible for the front page. Hopefully this year we can finally get the Cup on the front page. --PlasmaTwa2 08:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  100th Grey Cup and ITN 

message: An RfC discussion about the MOS:FLAG restriction on the use of flag icons for sportspeople has been opened at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. We invite all interested participants to provide their opinion here. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:47, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on the use of flag icons for sportspeople

message: American football protective equipment has been proposed to expand to cover Canadian football, see talk:American football protective equipment -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: American football protective equipment

message: This is a courtesy message to inform the members of this project that I have nominated Portal:Sports for featured portal status. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Sports. The featured portal criteria are at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria. Please feel free to weigh in. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Sports is up for featured portal consideration 

message: I'm collaborating on an attempt to improve the Quarterback article. There seem to be a wealth of sources out there on the history of American football, but I'm finding it slightly more difficult to get some good sourcing on the history of the position in Canadian football. If anyone has some pointers or knows good sources, please let us know – or just add them into the article. --Batard0 (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for good history sources 

message: This notice is to advise interested editors that a Contributor copyright investigation has been opened which may impact this project. Such investigations are launched when contributors have been found to have placed copyrighted content on Wikipedia on multiple occasions. It may result in the deletion of images or text and possibly articles in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. The specific investigation which may impact this project is located here.
All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to CCI clean up.  There are instructions for participating on that page. Additional information may be requested from the user who placed this notice, at the process board talkpage, or from an active CCI clerk. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns related to your project

message: Hello everyone. After a massive revamp and expansion over the last month, the Toronto Argonauts article is just about ready for promotion to FA. I've actually already sent it to GA. I'm hoping a couple of outside editors might look it over and offer any suggestions. Please do stop by. Dontreadalone (talk) 00:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toronto Argonauts FA push 

message: Like from here, 1952 in Canadian football. I can't find any All Star listings. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know whether you could find them online. Either newspapers from that time or books describing that period might include them. CRwikiCA talk 22:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to find all time All Stars 

message: Hi there. I just wanted to let you all know that I created Antoine Pruneau a couple of days ago; he's a Redblacks player, so the article is within the scope of the project. I was hoping to create more articles for CFL players who are currently redlinked, so if anyone has any suggestions for how I can improve, I would welcome them. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article 

message: Hi. Just seeking the input of informed editors as Template_talk:Infobox_NFL_player#Human_height_and_the_metric_system. Thanks.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 23:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Human height]] and the [[metric system]] 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hi, there is currently a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#VG comments subpages regarding whether it would be acceptable to permanently shift all comments subpages associated with WP:VG articles into talk. This shift would follow the recommended approach given at WP:DCS. The WikiProject Canadian Football articles that would be affected by this action are these:
*Maximum-Football
If you have objections related specifically to WikiProject Canadian Football's use of these subpages, please make this clear at the discussion so that other unrelated talk pages can be cleaned up where appropriate. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:VG comments subpages cleanup 

message: Head's up, CFL editors: It has been proposed that the infobox for current and retired CFL players (i.e. Template:Infobox gridiron football person) be merged with the infobox for current American college football players (i.e. Template:Infobox college football player).  Please express your opinion here: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 14.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD: proposed merge of Template:Infobox gridiron football person 

message: Template:LVPosseRoster - Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 23. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion notice 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello again football experts.  Here's an old draft that was never submitted for review at AfC.  I'm sure that the CFL is a notable league, but I don't know how to tell if this player was actually on the field.  Should the draft be kept and improved?—Anne Delong (talk) 11:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quinn Magnuson (Canadian Football / National Track and Field)]] 

message: Template:Infobox CFL team is up for deletion here. In addition, the delete notice broke the infobox, so it has been replaced with Template:Infobox American football team. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 03:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion notice 

message: Persondata has been deprecated and the template and input data are subject to removal from all bio articles in the near future.  For those editors who have entered accurate data into the persondata templates of NFL players and other bio subjects, you are advised to manually transfer that data to Wikidata before the impending mass deletion occurs.  Here are two examples of Wikidata for football players: Dan Marino and Tim Tebow.  If you have any more questions about the persondata removal, Wikidata, etc., please ping me.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOTICE: Persondata has been officially deprecated 

message: I've been creating some bio articles on CFL players, and I had a question regarding whether one can be considered a Grey Cup champion without having played in the game itself. For more information and to provide your opinion/knowledge on this topic, please head over to Talk:Charlie Power (Canadian football). Thanks! ~ RobTalk 05:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re:Grey Cup champions 

message: There is currently a requested move discussion at Talk:Reception (American football) that is attempting to build a consensus on what disambiguation phrase should be used when necessary for gridiron football articles. This has a relatively broad scope and may involve many articles that fall under the interest of this WikiProject. Please feel free to add your input on what disambiguation phrase should be used. ~ RobTalk 16:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move discussion on naming of football articles 

message: There has recently been a discussion at the talk page of the WikiProject on Accessibility regarding Template:Infobox gridiron football person. In the past, the template only had a single set of parameters for playing_years and playing_teams. This caused editors to create lists using . This violates Wikipedia's policies regarding accessibility (see WP:VLIST). To correct this issue, the template has been edited to include numbered parameters playing_years1/playing_team1 through playing_years20/playing_year20 (and similar for coaching, administrating, etc). Eventually, the parameters playing_years and playing_teams will likely be removed from the template and all articles will need to use the new parameters, in order to prevent future issues with accessibility. This template should generally not be in use in articles primarily related to this project, but in practice, many articles that this project will be interested in use it. Meant to remove this; this template is of major interest to most articles in this project.
There is further discussion ongoing about whether these changes should be done manually or with a bot. You can read and contribute to the discussion at the talk page. ~ RobTalk 21:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility of [[Template:Infobox gridiron football person]] 

message: I've started a discussion here that involves this project heavily. Please make a trip over there to see and/or contribute to the discussion. Crash Underride 01:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: It appears that the CFL website has outsourced all of it's pages with stats for players to a site run by STATS, Inc.. This move has broken all of the external links for CFL players using the  infobox. Unfortunately the change appears to be more than just a simple URL change (which could be fixed easily in the template), but rather it appears that the IDs associated with each player have changed as well. As such, the fix for this is going to require someone update the ID associated with the cfl parameter on every single article which includes this parameter.
Before that effort is undertaken, it might make sense to discuss whether this external link is actually valuable enough to justify that effort. Also, how confident are we that such a change will not be repeated? Does anyone have a guess as to how "permanent" this CFL site change is? Would it make more sense to link to some third-party site like CFLdb Statistics? Some discussion about the use of these types of external links in Infoboxes is going on over here, which some of you might be interested in chiming in on as well. Thanks! — DeeJayK (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: I've removed (commented out) the external links to cfl.ca in  until this issue can be addressed. I've also added a tracking category to see how many pages are currently using this parameter: . If anyone comes up with a plan for addressing this issue and is up for taking on the task of fixing (which I believe will mean manually touching every page in ) feel free to reach out to me and I'll be happy to assist with the template changes. — DeeJayK (talk) 22:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken CFL.ca links in articles using Template:Infobox NFL player 

message: Hey, Canadian sports fans.  WP:NFL is in the process of merging, replacing and deleting the last 350 or so remaining uses of :Template:Infobox NFL coach.  All bio articles for NFL players, coaches, executives and administrators will soon be using an improved version of Template:Infobox NFL player, :Template:Infobox NFL biography.  In reviewing the list of coaches that use the template, I discovered a number of CFL coaches -- including three current CFL head coaches -- that are using the soon-to-be-former infobox for NFL coaches:
# Rick Campbell
# Chris Jones (Canadian football coach)
# Hamp Pool
# Jeff Tedford
# Bob Wylie
As I understand it, all CFL personnel are supposed to use :Template:Infobox gridiron football person, not NFL-specific templates.  The conversion process for Infobox NFL coach should be complete in the next 30 days or so.  After that, the template will be deleted and redirected, and all support for it withdrawn.  If you guys want to convert these six infoboxes to their proper CFL template, now is the time to do it.  If you have any questions, please ping me.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 10:19, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Infobox NFL coach is being merged, replaced and deleted 

message: I recently acquired a major source for player data from the CFL. A book called "The Canadian Pro Football Encyclopedia: Every Player, Coach and Game, 1946-2012" is basically exactly what the title says. It's conceivable that the information in this book could be used to create an article on literally every single player that's played in the post-World War II professional era. Most of the articles that don't already exist would likely be stubs. I've also found cases where the information in this source improved existing articles. If any CFL editors are interested in making use of this source, please let me know. If you're interested in a specific player, I could provide a scan of that player's page in the book, which generally includes biographical information, all programs they've played for, and a table of statistics. If you're interested in article creation, I could provide a scan of 5 or so pages in the book. Each page contains information on roughly 15 players in alphabetical order. Let me know if this source would be helpful to you! ~ RobTalk 04:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for CFL stubs 

message: I'd like to automatically tag articles for our project within the categories of :Category:Players of Canadian football by position. This seems pretty common sense; all Canadian football players should obviously be tagged for this project. Any objections to that? ~ RobTalk 22:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  You mean no objections, right? (as opposed to no tagging). Heading off the inevitable question about this at the BRFA.  ~ RobTalk 22:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think they should all be tagged. One word answers lol. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatic tagging 

message: Every single link to the CFL player stats in  is broken, following a change in how the URLs are structured on the CFL website. Any ideas on how to fix this? The new URLs don't seem to follow a pattern based on the old from what I'm seeing, so this might require manual review. ~ RobTalk 02:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFL links in infoboxes broken 

message: Would anyone be opposed to setting up importance ratings for this project? WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm okay with it if and only if we set up guidelines for importance similar to Wikipedia:WikiProject_National_Football_League/Assessment#Importance_scale. I would oppose importance ratings if they were left to be subjective. ~ Rob13Talk 04:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a mock-up at User:WikiOriginal-9/Canadian football for anyone who's interested. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That all looks good to me. The cutoff points will always be somewhat arbitrary, but I think as long as we have some type of objective cutoff, the importance categories can be useful. How do we want to treat the CIS? It's hard to rank them against the CFL, but CIS coaches/players fall under this project's scope as well. I'd say head coaches with 3+ Vanier Cups should be High, 1–2 Vanier Cups should be Mid, and all other coaches should be Low. All CIS players should be Low, except Hec Crighton Trophy winners, who should be Mid. For non-biographies, highest level should be High for things like the Vanier Cup. Football-specific articles of current teams and specific Vanier Cup games would be Mid. Everything else, pretty much, would be Low. Thoughts? ~ Rob13Talk 23:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable. I already had the Vanier Cup listed as high and the individual Cups listed as mid. Also, are we sure that all of the Hec Crighton Trophy winners are notable. If we're gonna make winners of that award mid-importance, they should probably all be able to have their own articles, right? Same thing for the Vanier Cup winning coaches. They should probably all be notable too if we're gonna make them higher than low importance. I'm not stating an opinion on either one of their notabilities (is that a word). I'm just saying we should probably make sure before implementing this. Also, do you think CIS football should be ranked as high or top importance. Additionally, what do you think the individual CIS seasons should be ranked as. At least WP:CFB and WP:NFL are separate so they don't have to try and fit in both college and pro on their importance scales lol. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I did a little research. If you go to CIS football and go to the team section, you can see that a lot of current CIS head football coaches have their own articles. Of course, there may be a possibility that they just went unnoticed and someone created them all in one day. However, 3-time Vanier Cup winning coach Blake Nill seems to pass GNG (he played in the CFL regardless but still). Also, Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability#Coaches says that all Division I, I FCS, II, III and NAIA head coaches are notable. So if they're all notable, then Vanier Cup winning head coaches probably are too. And for the sake of this discussion, we're just talking about the CIS coaches that won something. The rest may be notable as well. The II, III and NAIA coaches don't even have to have won anything to be notable. Also, the Hec Crighton is like Canada's Heisman so they're probably notable as well. Looks like Mel Smith, Al Charuk and Larry Mohr played in the CFL if you wanna stub them out. So, overall, your criteria for 3+ Vanier Cups, 1–2 Vanier Cups and Hec Crighton Trophy winners sounds good. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

text: I started a discussion at WP:NFL if you wanna weigh in. Might as well do that before implementing the CFL scale. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 12:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delayed response; been swamped. All head coaches tend to be notable. It isn't a "default" thing in a notability guideline, I don't believe, but the reality is that a coach that wins a Vanier Cup is virtually guaranteed to meet WP:GNG based on the Vanier Cup-related coverage alone, not to mention the coverage head coaches of good teams get throughout the season. Hec Crighton Trophy winners would meet WP:NCOLLATH #1, in my opinion. It's the highest level national award a Canadian football player can win in college. ~ Rob13Talk 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that all sounds fair. I rated the individual Vanier Cup and CIS seasons as mid because the individual Grey Cup and CFL seasons are high. I also ranked individual CIS teams as mid and the CIS overall as high. I kept the junior football teams as low. If anyone ever wants to change something, feel free to suggest it. The only thing left up for debate is the seven seasons thing. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

text:  Did you move that importance guide somewhere? ~ Rob13Talk 15:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian football/Assessment. Also, in the unknown importance category, there are a lot of easy ones like seasons and Cups that could be quickly assessed semiautomatically if you're interested. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: More likely automatic based on category. I did something similar for WP:NFL. I'll take a look at that in a couple weeks; I have multiple high-edit bot tasks pending at the moment, so I've got to let those run their course before taking more stuff on. ~ Rob13Talk 19:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:Bobby Harris (gridiron football)#Requested move 11 October 2016, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks,   Paine  u/c 22:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move of "Bobby Harris (gridiron football)" 

message: I was looking for the  article alerts section on the page for this wikiproject. Is there one? If there isn't I'd be happy to add one. Ottawahitech (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article alerts? 

message: See discussion at Template talk:Infobox gridiron football person#Requested move 17 December 2016. Lizard (talk) 04:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move Infobox gridiron football person → Infobox CFL biography 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Navigation boxes in coaching articles (again), which involves articles in your WikiProject, regarding the issue of whether or not the navboxes in coaching articles should be collapsed or stay as is. Please comment there and not here. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 06:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  You're invited... 

message: An RFC has recently been started regarding a potential change to the notability guidelines for sportspeople. Please join in the conversation. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 23:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on sports notability

message: Could some of our content creators consider reviewing the GA nominations listed here as time permits? It's ideal for editors knowledgeable about Canadian football to review the GAs within this topic area, and the GA review process as a whole is quite backlogged lately. ~ Rob13Talk 23:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA noms 

message: A discussion which affects this community has started at Talk:Commonwealth Stadium (Edmonton)#Brick Field Logo. 117Avenue (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brick Field 

message: Forgive me if this is posted elsewhere, but I just updated Jeremy Lewis (gridiron football) to reflect the recent report by Herb Zurkowsky in the Gazette that Lewis has joined the Als' practice squad. Does that mean we add him to :Category:Montreal Alouettes players? Yes, right? It's the other league, but I see for example Duron Carter is categorized as an Indy Colt, even though he never got off the squad, so that must be the approach? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is the approach for gridiron football players. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Practice squad means they are entered into team player categories?

message: I don't have time to do much else now but I have created a stub for the impressive Brandon Zylstra. It needs some TLC but it has some of the basics. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Brandon Zylstra

message: Hello all. In an effort to finally resolve the never-ending and annoying GNG v SSG issue, I've proposed a revision of the NSPORTS introduction. You are all invited to take part in the discussion. Thank you. Jack | talk page 06:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at NSPORTS 

message: A move proposal affecting this project has been made at Talk:Gridiron football#Requested move 4 October 2017. The requested new title is North American football. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 09:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed page move of Gridiron football 

message: See discussion. Thanks. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion regarding the birth date and birth place parameters of Infobox CFL biography 

message: Canadian football players aren't always Canadian. Per MOS:BLPLEAD, opening a lead on a player by saying "X is a Canadian football player" when they are not of Canadian nationality is wrong. We need to say something like "X is an American gridiron football player", such as I did here. From a quick glance, I see there are other pages where the lead sentence makes an American CFL player appear to be Canadian by birth. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentences 

message: Hi WP:CFL members. I'm not sure if this would fall under your WikiProject's scope, but was wondering if someone might mind taking a look at :User:Lion1407/sandbox/Harrison Stewart (Football Player). I stumbled across the draft while checking on some recent image uploads. I'm not sure how undrafted/unsigned former college football players are assessed for notability, but :WP:NGRIDIRON doesn't seem to apply here. Anyway, if Stewart's notable for getting a tryout with a CFL team, the draft creator could probably use some help with the formatting, etc. to bring it inline with relevant policies and guidelines. Someone might be able to help out with the images as well. I also have a slight suspicion based upon :User talk:Diannaa#Harrison Stewart Photos that there might be some connection between the creator and Stewart. This is not such a big deal as long as the draft is submitted for review through AfC, but could be an issue later on if the draft becomes an article and the creator continues to try and edit it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Lion1407/sandbox/Harrison Stewart (Football Player) 

message: An RfC has been opened that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC:_Specifying_the_code_of_football_at_first_reference_in_team_articles --Trovatore (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Specifying_the_code_of_football_at_first_reference_in_team_articles.  Apparently it's "not an RFC"; I haven't followed up the link to find out why it's not. --Trovatore (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hello,Please note that History of American football positions, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: Hello. I was wondering if anyone would like to help create articles for the missing inductees in the Canadian Football Hall of Fame. I would definitely like if all of the missing builders were made first as they are important. Thanks :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks on Canadian Football Hall of Fame 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Canadian football is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Canadian football until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 00:34, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Canadian football]] for deletion 

message: WikiProject Women in Red is devoting the next two months (July and August) to a virtual editathon on Women in Sports. Please take this opportunity to write more articles about women footballers who lag far behind men on Wikipedia.--Ipigott (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Two month virtual editathon on Women in Sports

message: Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages...--Moxy 🍁 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject American football#Meaning of "field goal attempt". -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject American football#Meaning of "field goal attempt"]]

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: The Infobox in the 2017 CFL season, isn't matching the infoboxes in the others CFL season articles. GoodDay (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2017 CFL season 

message: Hey all, I hope everyone is safe and healthy. My name is HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I'm a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey. I was wondering if there was any interest in starting a WikiProject Sports channel on Discord? There's quite a few of us who are interested in sports, and I think it would be a good idea to help the WikiProject recruit more members. You guys can join us through here.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discord 

message: Hey all!
I am planning on having a WikiConference North America sports panel December 12 3:00 EST. This is something that has never been done before and there are many sports which are "native" to North America and part of the America identity. What it seems to be is that we (you, me, and other members of WikiSports) will be in a Zoom (or other video conferencing app) to discuss our experiences in editing sports on Wikipedia. These can range from combating vandalism to how to best get permission to use sports photos. The organizers of WikiConference North America (WCNA) created an Etherpad surrounding planning which I will link here. if you Command F "sports" you will find the section. This will be the very first panel WCNA has ever had on sports so not much to go off of here. 
Please ping me if you have questions as this page is not on my watchlist. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiConference North America 

message: I have made a proposal for a WikiProject, American Football Minor Leagues. It will improve football minor-league articles. Put your name in the "support" section of the article if you would like to join. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Football Minor Leagues WikiProject Proposal 

message: I have proposed Canada men's national football team be moved to Canada men's national gridiron football team. The current title is not sufficiently specific for it to be useful to a reader. The discussion is here. – PeeJay 11:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Canada men's national football team]] 

message: Hello. I was wondering if any of these sources are considered reliable for stats: Stats Crew/Just Sports Stats, Pro Football Archives, or CFLapedia. If not, I was wondering where I could find stats for retired CFL players from the 1980s-2000s that aren't on CFL.ca. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources for stats 

message: There is an open CfD that the members of this project may be interested in; please see here. Thanks, Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: CfD: [[:Category:Grey Cup champions]]

message: Hello, I have a few questions for the CFL and NFL project users
1. For the CFL, WP:NGRIDIRON states that Canadian football players are presumed notable if they played in the Canadian Football League, my question is, are the pre-CFL players notable too, because the league was founded as a merger between the IRFU and WIFU, so it was the same teams and players, just a different name of the league. I was wondering because I created a few Canadian football coach articles and wanted to make sure they would not be deleted (the current ones I have created I have made sure have received a lot of coverage (as some articles pass GNG with for say, 3 or 4 articles with SIGCOV, I made sure they received more than that, see Rev. Father Stanton)) And also, if they are notable, how far back would the notability go? 
2. For the NFL, in 1920, some of the NFL teams played against non league opponents, and they were counted as official games (in fact, I've created articles for some of those teams, see Lansing Oldsmobile, Kewanee Walworths, Zanesville Mark Grays, Gary Elks, Columbus Wagner Pirates, Chicago Boosters, Moline Universal Tractors, and those are some of the weirdest team names I've ever seen) this was only in the first season, though. Should the players and head coaches from the non league teams have articles too? As NGRIDIRON says that players in the NFL are notable. However, the only sources for the players would most likely just be a short newspaper article listing the rosters, which is not significant coverage. In addition, these players do not have NFL.com, Pro-Football-Reference.com, or profootballarchives pages. I don't think these players should have articles since there is probably barely anything on them, as even some NFL players from the 20s don't have much on them.
3. Also for the NFL, should the Syracuse Pros players have articles? As they do not have Pro Football Reference pages and the Pros are a debated NFL team.
4. Again NFL, but this is more minor league, I was going to create an article for Dutch Slagle (I already did make an article for him, but it was changed to a redirect because "minor league coaches don't pass notability criteria", but that was good at the time because I barely had any sources), coach of the Wilmington Clippers in 1937, but I'm not sure if he is also George Slagle who played in the NFL in 1926. I think this because it says here that he spent time with Louisville, where George Slagle played. (and he does meet GNG based on my newspaper clippings, see        plus more) 
Ref                   	Name                     	BDate      	DDate     	Played                                                     	Coached
PFR                   	George Slagle            	June23,1899	?         	1 game (1926)                                              	DNC
PFArchives            	George E. Slagle         	Sept25,1900	Nov14,1946	1 game (1926)                                              	DNC
PFArchives (Dutch)    	Geoffry B. "Dutch" Slagle	1904       	?         	DNP                                                        	1937 (Clippers)
My Newspaper Clippings	George B. Slagle         	?          	?         	Atlantic City, Canton, NYG, Louisville, Chicago, Wilmington	Wilmington (1937), Scranton Miners (1938 or 39), Pottstown High (1940)
                      	                         	           	          	                                                           	
Thanks BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions for NFL, CFL projects 

message: There is a discussion you may wish to contribute to at Talk:Clarke Stadium#Elks at Clarke Stadium. Indefatigable (talk) 16:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elks at Clarke Stadium 

message: There seems to be confusion as to the totals or types of division titles for teams at West Division (CFL) & East Division (CFL). Trying figure which should go into each of the team articles. Regular seasons titles or playoff titles. GoodDay (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team playoff or regular season division titles 

message: Hope the Project Team might have answered this in the past, have a quick answer to point to.
If 1955 in Canadian football is the first season that the playoff competition for the Grey Cup was between professional teams only, why does the 1954 in Canadian football article state "1954 is generally recognized as the start of the modern era of Canadian football"? Is it because of the NBC contract for eastern (Interprovincial Rugby Football Union) teams? Is it because of some specific rule change? Is it because of the one, passing, mention in the referenced Jim Mullin article, saying "In 1954 – generally recognized as the start of the modern era of Canadian football –", though giving no explanation?  Is it because 1954 is when the professional clubs finally got fed up with having to play the amateur clubs (which would mean the start of "preparing" for the modern era, rather than the actual start itself, which happens in 1955)?
Is there something in one of the three books shown in Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian football#Resources that gives a specific reason for the statement? If so, that would be a terrific reference and detail to add in support of the statement that 1954, which appears to be no different from 1953, is somehow the start of "modern", rather than 1955, when a very specific and meaningful changedropping the amateur clubs from competition for the Grey Cupoccurred. Look forward to the details on this. Thanks. Jmg38 (talk) 09:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understood it, 1954 was the first season that the Ontario Rugby Football Union stopped competing for the Grey Cup. From the 1954 season onward, the Grey Cup was competed for only by what would eventually become the West Division & East Division of the CFL. GoodDay (talk) 20:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why count from 1954? 

message: Your input, one way or the other, on several pending proposals to alter NSPORTS would be welcomed. These proposals are as follows:
:* Subproposal 1: Requires "all athlete biographies must demonstrate GNG when notability is challenged at AfD" and that "SIGCOV in multiple secondary, independent reliable sources would have to be produced during the course of an AfD". Also potential limitations/exceptions.
:* Subproposal 3: "Remove all simple or mere 'participation' criteria in NSPORT, outside of ones related to Olympics and equivalent events."
:* Subproposal 4: "Modify all provisions of NSPORTS that provide that participation in 'one' game/match such that the minimum participation level is increased to 'three' games/matches. This raises the threshold for the presumption of notability to kick in."
:* Subproposal 5: "Implement a requirement that all sports biographies and sports season/team articles must, from inception, include at least one example of actual WP:SIGCOV from a reliable, independent source. Mere database entries would be insufficient for creation of a new biography article."
:* Subproposal 6: "Conditional on Subproposal 6 passing, should a prod-variant be created, applicable to the articles covered by Subproposal 5, that would require the addition of one reference containing significant coverage to challenge the notice."
:* Subproposal 8: "Rewrite the introduction to clearly state that GNG is the applicable guideline, and articles may not be created or kept unless they meet GNG." Further: "Replace all instances of 'presumed to be notable' with 'significant coverage is likely to exist.'
:* Subproposal 9: Strike, as allegedly confusing and/or at odds with other parts of NSPORTS, the following sentence from the lead: "The article should provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline or the sport specific criteria set forth below."
:* Subproposal 10:  "Require each project that has inclusion criteria based on participation in a league ... within the next 30 days to justify the inclusion of each league. Such justification must include actual 'random' (truly random) sampling showing that 90%-plus of the players in each league receive sufficient SIGCOV to pass GNG. At the end of 30 days, any league as to which the data has not been provided must be stricken from NSPORTS." Cbl62 (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Further proposals

message: See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League#RIP NGRIDIRON regarding its repeal. Cbl62 (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIP NGRIDIRON 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Do we 'really' need team location maps, in the CFL season pages? GoodDay (talk) 06:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps recently added to CFL season pages 

message: I wanted to call attention here to Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level/5#Add_Warren_Moon_and_if_necessary_remove_Doug_Flutie.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital article discussion of relevance 

message: See this thread. Frietjes (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion involving coloring of NFL templates 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at  to reach consensus on football at Canadian universities.—Bagumba (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  U Sports football 

message: Wikipedia guidelines were changed early last year to require that all sports biographies have at least one piece of WP:SIGCOV (not counting database entries). In recent months, there have been efforts to draftify en masse sport substubs that do not comply with this requirement. Accordingly, we have begun a campaign to improve gridiron football biographies that could be targeted in a similar RfC. See full list of most vulnerable Canadian football articles here. The list is not intended as criticism of anyone, as such stubs were permitted prior to the change in policy. Instead, the purpose is to encourage each of us to clean up these stubs so as to avoid draftification or deletion. I am hoping that all Canadian football project members will revisit some of these articles to add the required SIGCOV. Thanks, Cbl62 (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian football stubs 

message: Discussion here. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Edmonton Elks]] has been proposed for renaming 

message: Hello, an RFC is being held, which may effect the CFL & other Canadian football related pages. GoodDay (talk) 17:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC of interest 

message: You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current CFL team rosters. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD of interest 

message: FWIW - Heads up on a recently closed RFC, which may effect the future naming of CFL Draft & related pages. GoodDay (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It should have no bearing on the capitalization of the CFL Draft, except to signal that a discussion could end up happening soon. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  A few people are drafted by both the NFL and CFL. It's going to look weird having "NFL draft" and "CFL Draft" at, for example, Sidy Sow once someone updates the NFL infobox. I don't really mind either way. I understand both sides of the capitalization issue. It used to be at lowercase for awhile so I'm used to it anyways. Also, I'm not sure if you're watching this page or not so what's why I pinged you. Thanks, ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

text: (copied from my other comment for visibility) As the RfC closer, I can confirm that the close applies only to pages related to the NFL draft and has no impact on other leagues or sports. There was some discussion of them at the RfC, but was unrelated to the RfC question or the consensus reached. Anyone trying to use it to bypass discussion on other articles is not interpreting the close correctly. The WordsmithTalk to me 17:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential page moves 

message: A multi-RM has been opened, concerning the CFL Draft & related pages. GoodDay (talk) 22:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM for CFL Draft & related pages