Talk:Miri Regev

message: There was some highly controversial material just added, and while it's sourced to a reliable source, the source is behind a paywall which I cannot access. Can anyone please verify that the statements are supported by the sources? —Ynhockey (Talk) 00:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Apparently Haaretz very recently implemented a payable archive. When I was checking the sources they were still freely available. I do confirm the content of the sources. I do understand your reservations to unqualified en.WP users (good to see someone is checking contents here), but I am a well established editor in de.WP with several thousand edits, including article concerning the Middle East and Israel, if that's enough credit for you. Unfortunately I don't have any available contents of the Haaretz articles though. Regards, --Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

text: I've re-added the claim whose source is now freely available and which I can therefore confirm. (According to WP:PAYWALL, paywall articles should not be automatically rejected either, though I'd indeed appreciate a screenshot for the incredible "fascist" claim.) --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New statements and sources added 

message: Israel, Mired in Ideological Battles, Fights on Cultural Fronts - ctrl-f "The previous round".
AllThatJazz2012 (talk) 00:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her "Loyalty in Culture" initiative should be on the page. 

message: Someone explain to me how the opinion of a haartz journalist is considered relevant or fact to be included in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.107.210 (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not considered a fact, the article explicitly says so. While I would like more context for this paragraph myself, simply removing it is unjustified. Do you take issue with the actual paragraph? —Ynhockey (Talk) 15:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion is not fact 

message: This is a strange mention in her biography, particularly with no source. Possible vandalism? Mcsteez (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaginismus? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miri Regev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080531061637/http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/Announcements/2007/08/0702.htm to http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/Announcements/2007/08/0702.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Miri Regev Posts Video Surrounded By Genocidal Chants 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMmJVC93_dc  
Miri Regev with Beitar fans, January 22, 2018 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS_ALvW40yI
10:10 
Beitar Jerusalem fans: 'Here we are, we're the most racist football team in the country' 
The Guardian 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJOV_cN-JP8
--Über-Blick (talk) 07:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miri Regev and the fans of  [[Beitar Jerusalem]] 

message: Template:Infobox member of the Knesset has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox officeholder. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for merging of Template:"Infobox member of the Knesset"