lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Port Moody

message: These statistics tables have really got to go. They could be reincorporated as paragraph sized blurbs or something similar, but as of now they're an eyesore. I'd also say they're outside the scope of an encyclopedia article but I'll wait for some consensus before changing that much of this article.
I agree. Maybe make that section collapsable? I've seen this on other pages. Greg Salter 16:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll put it on the lengthy to-do list, but anyone else is free to rid the page of them, too--Keefer4 09:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These are facts, so unless it is cited, the information should be completely removed per WP:V anyways. Billscottbob (talk) 04:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  stats tables 

message: With respect to the contributors, I don't think an article on Port Moody should be dominated by a rather peripheral discussion of submarine activity in the area. The story of Port Moody's early existence is obviously the railway, and that gets a short para at the bottom.
The stuff itself is interesting, but this isn't the right article. Maybe dump the "BC Submarine Navy" into the article on the premier of the time, and so forth.
If there's consensus on this, I'll try to de-submarinize the article at some point in the near future. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rcousine (talk • contribs) 01:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submarines...what? 

message: There's a link in the article to CN Rail. Isn't the only rail line in Port Moody CP Rail, or am I wrong?  Greg Salter (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CN Rail? 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was move.
Proposed rename: Port Moody, British Columbia → Port Moody
Port Moody currently redirects to Port Moody, British Columbia. There is no Port Moody (disambiguation) page; other uses of Port Moody in page names are either secondary to the community or used in composite names. As the place name is evidently unique and primary, it is proposed to simplify the page name per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. Dl2000 (talk) 03:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Oppose; Port Moody is too small for stand-alone status and has no name recognition outside of British Columbia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.35.112 (talk) 06:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't matter, it happened 2 years ago. And it was the right decision.  Greg Salter (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to rename page
Talk:Nick Peros

message: Notability of this composer should be checked. The page is written as advertisement material by User:Michellebryan whose only activity  here was spamming articles with references to Nick Peros. Because of this I consider the whole text as suspicious and needing check. Pavel Vozenilek 19:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Michellebryan seems to have good intentions, and i have checked her numerous sources, which back up the subject's notability per WP:MUSIC (a record he produced went platinum in Canada, and he's been covered in multiple non-trivial verifiable sources, including the Toronto Star). I'm gonna go ahead and remove the tag. Pavel, please try not to bite the newcomers.--Alhutch 16:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carlo Carrà

message: I agree to the cat sorting as is, but you'll find that wiki has a robot that automatically sorts them by alphabet. I had moved them originally in order to anticipate the change. Dahn 19:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graham Swift

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- BirgitteSB 00:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: That's debatable.
Graham Swift (born May 4, 1949) is a British author is more appropriate. Skinnyweed 19:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well-known? 

message: Is he related to Jonathan Swift?--Oxonian2006 00:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jonathan Swift]] 
Talk:33⅓

message: Um, the numbers given for some of the books are all out of whack.  35 is Bob Dylan's Highway 61 Revisited, not London Calling.  The Who Sell Out is number 37, not 40.  Stevie Wonder's Songs In The Key of Life is 42, and 69 Love Songs by the Magnetic Fields is number 69.  There's A Riot Going On is 32, not 36.  Doolittle is 31, not 32.  It goes on like this.  My guess is that someone put up a speculative series of numbers before they came out.
 (69.134.166.43 01:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed. I'm not in the business of deleting things for the sake of it, so if there's a story to tell let's hear it :) --kingboyk 19:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

text: If it's kept you ought to think about having a disambiguation page. You already have 2 alternative uses, and there's at least one album by that name plus it's the speed at which a vinyl LP spins. You could point to one disambig page at the top instead of multiple links to other 33 1/3 pages.
I marked it book-stub.  It's mainly a long list of titles in a series.  What is the significance of these books?  How do they tie together? RJFJR 16:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I think if you read all the Wikipedia articles on these albums, at least some of the information on them may well have come from these books. They detail a lot of the personal and musical background that led to the making of these significant (in many cases revolutionary) albums. Fan1967 04:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Link to old AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/33 1/3 --A. B. 05:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Witch's milk

message: I'm voting to move this to neonatal milk and instead have Witch's milk redirect there. I believe the scientific term should take precidence. Objections? Please vote. Tyciol 19:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection, although the word is "precedence" ;-)  When/if it gets moved, switch the order of the names in the article lead.  Tomertalk 05:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote to move

message: Since there hasn't been any discussion on this since 2006, and especially no votes against merging, I have gone ahead and merged this article into Galactorrhea.  I called the sub-section "Neonatal Milk", rather than "Witch's Milk" - the only opposition to this was a lack of evidence that "neonatal milk" was the correct term, but I've found this article: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1538139/ titled "Milk protein concentrations in neonatal milk (witch's milk)." which seems to suggest that the term is correct. Dracunculus (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: I am sorry to say it but this babymilk-thing must be fake! Can anyone provide any scientific evidence for this phenomenon actually existing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.167.154.135 (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Witches' milk#References *rolls eyes* ~九尾の氷狐~ (「Sumimasen!」 「Dochira samaka?」) 12:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fake!

message: Witch's milk is not a disease or anything that should prompt concerns hence I think it is a bad idea to have it as a subsection of a condition that is frequently indicative of serious conditions. Richiez (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing merge with [[galactorrhea]] 

message: Shouldn't the title be "Neonatal Milk?" Folksy terms like "witch's milk" are typically mentioned as an aside so as not to overly validate them. In this case it’s a huge focus od the article for some reason I am possibly not aware of.
Don't get me wrong, I love the term, but it is quite bizarre. 2603:7081:1603:A300:BC83:BC4:8C21:63F1 (talk) 13:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title is weird
Talk:Charles Follen

message: There is a second article "Karl Follen"! --134.93.192.167 20:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:StabiliTrak

message: Is StabiliTrak more than just the trademark?  Or is there a functional difference.  Should this be a redirect?
I agree, GM's StabiliTrak technology is the same as ESC. StabiliTrak is just a marketing name and most companies use a different name, for example, our Honda has Vehicle Stability Assist (VSA). ZacJ71 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sorginak

message: AFAIK, the Spanish Inquisition very rarely attacked witches.
It dealt with Conversos and Protestants.
The Logroño process was the apex of it.
(By the way, the Spanish film Aquelarre covers it.
The article makes it appear as an everyday thing.
--Error 01:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logroño
Talk:Fiannamail ua Dúnchado

message: His death is not in doubt, nor the fact that he was grandson of Dúnchad. IIRC, Bannerman presumes him to have been king of Irish Dál Riada. If he is the son of Conall Cael mac Dúnchada whose death in Kintyre is reported in A.U. s.a. 681, he may equally have been a Cenél nGabráin king. C.f. Dunchád Becc of Kintyre, and in A.U., s.a. 701: A skirmish in Scí in which Conaing son of Dúnchad and Cuanna's son fell. The text of gloss to the Internet Medieval Sourcebook version of the Cáin Adomnáin makes him a king in Ireland. Thoughts anyone ? Angus McLellan 20:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As IP states, they may be 'a' king of Dal Riata. The way Gaelic kingdoms work there is obviously an overking, or king of kings, of Dal Riata, who as their title suggests rules over other kings, in this case most likely petty kings of the tuaths that formed Dal Riata. This figure may simply be one of these lower rank kings. He may be the overking himself. Heck we don't know and medieval doctoring and propaganda in the annals makes it hard to know which. All we can do is provide what the sources state and attribute it to the historians and sources who make the claims. Mabuska (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity, king of which Dál Riata ?
Talk:Genetic World

message: The result was: Merge as proposed. --B. Wolterding 09:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Breathe and Genetic World 
Talk:Theodore A. Parker III

message: Great effort, but reads a bit like a memorial - should be easy to fix. SP-KP 20:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I did another edit, but I probably made it more like a memorial.  What are you objecting to?  Is there information that's excessive, or is the problem the tone?  Or, as I don't need to tell you, feel free to edit it yourself.  —JerryFriedman 21:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I think this article is much improved. It is certainly much better than many others on WP. I am removing the tag. -- cmh 00:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  (Including for checking back.)  I must say, though, that reading Daniel Janzen gave me more of an appreciation for what you and SP-KP waswere objecting to, so I may revisit this article at some point with raised consciousness.  —JerryFriedman 00:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improved
Talk:Capac, Michigan

message: Where does the name Capac come from?
-
Capac comes from some indian chief that the founders admired. Not sure of the name, they taught us this in elementry school
-MichiganHottay14  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.229.102.73 (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Echoing Green

message: "At the end of the poem it becomes quite sinister and could be swaying towards that it must all come to the end anyway."
Poorly written, surely
Surely, indeed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.39.80 (talk) 04:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: I move to move this page to "The Ecchoing Green" since that is the proper spelling. Curious to hear what everyone else thinks...--Abie the Fish Peddler (talk) 08:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and wish I had seen this earlier. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Echoing or Ecchoing?

message: This article desperately needs a citation for the poem itself. Where it is not an infringement of copyright law to post the poem it is, however, silly to not have source to validate that this is in fact the correct poem. 
Also, as with most books, novels, poems articles I've read on wiki, this poem is badly in need of some interpretation.
Aramilalpha (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations & Interpretation

message: This article could also be well improved with information about the scansion and the structure of the poem. In otherwords, ryhme schemes, syllables per line, etc etc... Aramilalpha (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT Lithoderm 18:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scansion & Structure 

message: U 2405:204:3112:689:8523:894B:E868:B6F9 (talk) 07:09, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  B
Talk:Unhalfbricking

message: Can anyone tell me where this photo was taken please?Bill lenny (talk) 14:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have sourced & added this to the article: Arthur Road, Wimbledon SE19. The church in the background is at 51 25'43.03N, 0 12'37.67W. --Rodhullandemu 14:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover pic 

message: Matthew Greenwald wrote at Allmusic that "Genesis Hall" is an "exquisite adaptation of an old, Elizabethan folk-based melody with a modernist approach". The review has later been replaced.
Would anybody here happen to know if this is true and which melody it is based on? – Hattrem (talk) 12:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Genesis Hall

message: Track times, as given on the back of the UK Island IMCD 293 (Island Re-Masters series) CD, can seen here. Was the original vinyl any different? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track times
Talk:Liege & Lief

message: I don't understand the prominence given to US reviews such as by Rolling Stone. FC were always a very British band and it's hardly surprising that American reviewers accustomed to The Byrds had trouble understanding this album initially. The whole UK electric folk movement of the 70s initiated by this album was largely ignored in America. British critics didn't like the Grateful Dead or Blue Oyster Cult, should their views dominate WP articles on albums by these acts? --Ef80 (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Tend to agree. Some American reviews at least indicate the band's reach, even at that time? But by all means feel free to balance by adding UK ones. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  FC was and is hugely influential in the UK, but not in the US; don't know about Canada.  Although American, I myself especially loved this album when it first appeared (on Boston's WBCN), and still love it, because I grew up listening to British folk records that my British father and grandfather brought to our household.  Acwilson9 (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for sharing that Acwilson. I guess that was the FM one, not the one in North Carolina. Producer Joe Boyd was American of course. That external link, from 2014, is worth a look. Thompson convinced him with one guitar solo when they opened for Pink Floyd at the UFO Club (... and that gig is not even currently mentioned in the main FC article!)  Martinevans123 (talk) 20:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I adjusted the "reception" section a year or three back, forgot to note it here, giving perspectives from UK reviewers in the main. Hoping it is better now :) Cheers Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 22:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  US perspective
Talk:Cromlech

message: Sorry, I'm french and very interested by all kinds of megalith. And there is a big difference between a cromlech and a dolmen. A dolmen is supposed to be closed. In fact, it's the name given to the stones building (burial) you find under the mound of dirt of a tumulus.
As far as the cromlech is concerned, it's all about a circle made out of erected stones separated from each other. It seems to have been a place for religious celebrations. <unsigned comment by 62.212.119.130>
:That's what we are saying - dolmens are chamber tombs and cromlechs are stone circles in France. The term cromlech is also used in Welsh for a 'dolmen' though. That is why this is a disambiguation page. adamsan 20:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is obviously a disambig page but the last editor removed the "disambig" tag. 69.86.6.150 (talk) 17:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is not a proper disambiguation page per WP:DAB and WP:MOSDAB. This at present looks to be like some sort of stubby overview. older ≠ wiser 17:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I'll tidy it up to be a real disambig page. It isn't really a stub article as there is no topic, just a word. 69.86.6.150 (talk) 21:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: What does "altar-tomb" mean?  Dolmens are described as such here, but the Dolmen article doesn't use the term. Iapetus (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Altar-tomb"
Talk:Hokey Pokey (album)

message: What sort of fleshing out of this (or similar) article would be appropriate?
I'm willing to help and expand where I can, but it seems to me that there's a danger of editorialising. I could opine that this album presents a particularly bleak outlook on the part of Thompson, or muse over the placing of Mike Waterson's "mole in a hole" at the end of the album, but is that appropriate for Wikipedia?
So what IS required/recommended/suggested please?
Bob Dubery 09:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  When you're dealing with an aural artform it is hard to be encyclopedic - I know what you mean.  What I like is what a couple of contributors have done with the 1970s Hawkwind albums like Doremi Fasol Latido with the Side 1/2 breaks, Band Quotes, Release History etc.  Also add references like biographies & interviews & refer to them taking short, relevant & not too gushing quotes. The Hawkwind stuff walks the line really well in my opinion.  You need to know what it sounds like but you aren't the one to write that as it's original research.  Anyway, contribute!  Help out & the rest of us will polish what you've done & hopefully it'll turn out better than any one of us could do Megamanic 02:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pour Down Like Silver

message: This article reads more like a review, with lots of value judgements. There's a lot of good info in their too, so it shouldn't all go. Any RT experts who know enough referenced material to give it a go? Ed zeppelin (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 
Talk:Shoot Out the Lights

message: This has three chronologies - but shouldn't the RT one include Strict Tempo ! ? -- Beardo (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, Strict Tempo! was released in 1981, after 1979's Sunnyvista, but it's treated as a "Fan club and boutique label release"? Martinevans123 (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: The new box set includes this from the Rafferty sessions in a 1996 remix. Was that previously released ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm a Dreamer 

message: The article notes Bootleg releases of the Rafferty tapes, but not the release of a handful of those tracks on the Watching the Dark anthology on Ryko. 157.131.152.222 (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the Watching the Dark article mentions the three, but fails to identify them. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Rafferty tracks did get official release
Talk:André le Breton

message: I've scrounged up whatever information I could about le Breton, but there's obviously more that needs to be written. In particular:
* DOB/death
* A more detailed account of how he became involved with the Encyclopedie
* Involvement in later lawsuits over the Encyclopedie
The references I included seem to have some more information relating to the above. --Dantheox 20:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Acme (album)

message: let me know if anyone out there finds an image of the album cover. Eyeball kid 20:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Butterfly (Hollies album)

message: This page has details of the US version, but there is also Dear Eloise / King Midas in Reverse. I don't think we want both, do we ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  US version
Talk:Bill Schonely

message: This article seems to be a near copy-paste of this NBA release... If someone has a second to tag accordingly or rewrite, that'd be great. --Gregoe86 20:35, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. One thing to add would be how Schonely became persona-non-grata to the Blazers during the Jail Blazers era, and was welcomed by the Beavers. Won't find much about that in Blazers PR, I'd bet, but the Portland Tribune's archives oughtta have something. -Pete 03:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Carly Wicks

message: Hmm? --Sweetie Petie 20:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: God (or Kate Harwood as she is sometimes known) only knows! Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 23:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't she called Carly Pappas? 

message: who fancies carly wickes..  wish i could find a tomboy as gorgeous as her!
:Probably. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Am I the only bloke? 

message: It says her occupation is assistan mechanic, yet she now works for her father selling cars and no longer in the garage full time.
:Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 09:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation? 

message: Here's a source that I can't be bothered to add.  –anemoneprojectors– 13:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Bradlees

message: Since this store went bankrupt, do I still have to repay the credit card??
:Who issued it? 84.51.131.252 (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  debt 

message: To whoever wrote the "debt" chapter:
You should have written "since this CHAIN went bankrupt", not "since this STORE went bankrupt". Bradlees was not a store but a chain of stores.
 * Scheinwerfermann vandalized the edits of dozens of other editors.  Njbob (talk) 21:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: debt
Talk:Gabriel Lalemant

message: I have had difficulty putting the picture into the infobox.  When I attempted, the picture was displayed full-size.  Could anyone fix this?  Thanks --Merkurix 10:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I figured it out.  Thanks! --Merkurix 09:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox pic