lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edmund Tudor, 1st Earl of Richmond

message: As I asked in Jasper Tudor, if Tudor's father's arms were as shown in Owen Tudor how did Owen's sons use "the arms of the kingdom..."? Avalon (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Arms

message: I don't quite get this line-why would Edmund and Jasper Tudor need to be brought to Henry VI's notice considering that they were Henry's half brothers? Its not like Henry would not have known his mother had other kids.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.77.127.106 (talk) 19:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "brought them to Henry VI's notice" 

message: Where does Edmund's precise date of birth come from? The ODNB only gives "c.1430". – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 10:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to know the answer to this as well.  History Lunatic (talk) 09:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: Edmun had the wardship of nine-year-old Margaret Beaufort. Thus the annullment of her Beaufort marriage "enable[d] her to be [married] to Edmund" not remarried.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.110.36 (talk) 15:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "remarried to Edmund" 

message: After doing some research on the interesting background of his birth, would other users be happy to include the following paragraph that I drafted? Thanks
"After the death of Henry V, Queen dowager Catherine of Valois had an affair in 1427 with Edmund Beaufort. This led to a parliamentary statute to regulate the remarriage of queens of England. Catherine then secretly married Owen Tudor to avoid breaking the statutes of 1227/8. Her relationship with Beaufort thus came to an end, although it is possible that Edmund Tudor was the biological son of Beaufort. The exact dates of Edmund Tudor's birth and marriage of Catherine and Owen are not known. Some historians have suggested that Edmund Tudor was named after Edmund Beaufort and historian John Ashton-Hill states that the coat of arms later used by Edmund and Jasper Tudor were in fact derived from that of Edmund Beaufort."
References
Titus Gold (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth background paragraph
Talk:Mammalian embryogenesis

message: From where does the term "stem cell" actually derive?
::Not sure about that. It's a good question though! Can anyone provide an answer? Just a little note to the questioner, it's customary for users to sign their posts on the discussion page. This makes it easier to read the flow of the discussion.--Nicholas 15:00, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  stem cell question 

message: The article suddenly stops at the formation of the amniotic and yolk sacs it would seem... is there a reason for this or has no one gotten around to writing about the trilaminar embryo, folding and preliminary organogenesis? I have just started writing the trilaminar embry page and realized there is no article (that I can find) which explains how an embryo comes to be three-layered. I also noticed there is no Human Embryogenesis article, which would make a perfect resting place for this sort of information. Anyone interested in helping with such an article should head over to the page for discussion, cheers -- Serephine / talk - 08:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond the cavity formation 

message: Is "invade" the verb used in technical scientific discussions? Thank you. --Dpr 00:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question: "Invading" the endometrium

message: Mammalian embryogenesis is already well covered in Embryogenesis - this page adds nothing and its inclusion is unnecessary Shall merge Iztwoz (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Prem Rawat/Archive 11

message: German editors found our articles "Prem Rawat" and "Kritik an Prem Rawat" so obscure that they categorized it under , which means, they suspect the whole construct to be done as a catalyst for linkspamming. The critics-article will get deleted because they see it's mere existence as POV. And the main article is already completely shortened. None of those editors have read the originals or are even interested in it. So much to Wikipedia - Germany.Thomas h 18:28, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is with German editors and article splitting? Articles split when there is a need. Space is not an issue. This is not Encarta.  Let it be. --Zappaz 06:14, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: According to Thomas' remarks, the Rawar articles are splitted because you have not been able to integrate critics into the main article. This means: the main article is POV, and the critics article is POV. WP ist not usenet, articles are not discussion forums. You should work on this problem and not try to insert it into the german WP. I state that both articles should be integrated. I proposed an integrated german version  MBq --213.6.132.254 13:18, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is incorrect. This article integrates the criticism of a small (but certainly vociferous) group of ex-followers. That is more than enough. --≈ jossi ≈ 15:47, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
Obviously, Jossi. "More than enough". Together with Criticism of Prem Rawat, it integrates critics, anti-critics and anti-anti-critics. - Encyclopedia articles should display facts, not their editors' discussions. It is possible to state the fact Ex-supporters strongly criticise DLM's commercial behavior and Rawat's lack of integrity in ONE sentence. No need to add a sentence that Rawat's supporters object to this critics. No need to add that the ex-premies object to the supporters response. And so on... Please have a look on Britannica's or Encarta's entries concerning "Divine Light Movement" for examples. Greetings from germany, MBq --217.185.22.138 13:14, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry but German Translation got completly crippled
Talk:Geometrodynamics

message: Gosh, I tried to add a comment here an hour so so ago, but apparently it didn't take.
I was trying to say that I just added to the article some citations to print books which I think rather decisively show that the article as it stands mischaracterizes the state of geometrodynamics.  First, in two books  coauthored by Wheeler and published in 1973, 1995 respectively, he uses Einstein geometrodynamics as a synonym for general relativity, which has certainly never become anabandoned domain of physics!  Second, one article in the book edited by Butterfield is on quantum geometrodynamics, which is very much alive.
So I think this article needs to be thoroughly rewritten.  If no-one objects (is anyone but me "watching" this page?), I'd like to do that in the next week or so.
:I'm watching now, :) --MarSch 13:24, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: General Relativity has proven to be satisfactory for most purposes. The exception occurs in cases of high energy and short distances where Quantum Mechanics cannot be ignored. Quite a lot has been published by research groups attempting to join GR with QM. Examples are causal set theory, loop quantum gravity, twistor theory, noncommutative geometry, and string theory. Robert J. Low of Coventry University remarked in a recent discussion on Research Gate "Everybody who knows enough about it to understand the question expects GR to break down at very high energies." Topological Geometrodynamics or TGD
has been developed by a theoretical physicist in Finland Matti Pitkänen for about 40 years as one of the many attempts to modify GR for high energy. TGD has become associated with Scale Relativity of Laurent Nottale, and Squeezed Coherentstates in the high energy range. Astrojed (talk) 19:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why General Relativity Needs To Be Modified

message: Before the International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science in 1960 Wheeler began by quoting William Kingdon Clifford's "Space theory of Matter" of 1870.
Can we get links in the references to those two?
Crasshopper (talk) 07:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clifford link 

message: You philosophically and unmathematically claimed: completely in terms of geometry. (and not in terms of entropic geometry - and then we have to create the missing page)
Emotional words are wrongly put in science.
Usually geometry is static/non-evolving.
In geometrodynamics geometry is entropic; everchanging and evolving (series of calculations that do not stop).
Fix your vague mistake.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4104:B0C1:41A3:E72B:1F52:909C (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  You have a MAJOR mistake (vaguness is a mistake in encyclopedias; a '''complete''' reality I never elaborated; but I used the poetic word)
Talk:Miss E... So Addictive

message: So what does the man say in the opening seconds of Get Ur Freak On? Sounds like Japanese, though I could easily be mistaken. - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I can't back this up, and I doubt anyone cares at this point, but parts of the album, and "Get Ur Freak On" in particular are known to be heavily influenced by Mindless Self Indulgence. Rumor has it, that the head of Electra, who at that time signed both acts, gave Missy copies of Tight and FGWSSS, and told her to base at least one single off of them. This incident ultimately led to Mindless Self Indulgence leaving the label. Jimmy Urine of Mindless Self Indulgence has said that he had to listen to "Get Ur Freak On" over 50 times before he could be convinced it was a song he himself didn't write. JEMdev (talk) 06:58, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration 
Talk:Edd Kalehoff

message: On May 19, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Edd Kalehoff for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:25, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: While it is knowingly difficult to find reliable sources related to composers of television theme music, I want to reiterate that this article is in desperate need of some third-party documentation, as it gets very fuzzy to attribute all of the various mentioned themes to Kalehoff, when he may have been in the employ of Score, and thus sharing credit with other team collaborators. - AppleBsTime (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources
Talk:Albury Gold Cup

message: The first sentence of the article is
The Albury Gold Cup is a horse race in the North-East of Victoria and Southern New South Wales.
Which bridge(s) does it cross? The race can't be in both states without crossing a bridge. People who write tiny stubs containing a fraction of the interesting knowledge they obviously have on a subject annoy me. Alternatively, people who write patent nonsense in an encyclopaedia annoy me too. --ScottDavis 01:28, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate your point.  However, Albury is in southern New South Wales but considers itself part of the north east Victoria region.  I therefore understand what the writer (who is new to Wikipedia) was trying to say.--AYArktos 01:56, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the Albury (NSW) Gold Cup is held at a track in Victoria? I also notice that it was you who deleted this author's reference to the Gold Cup from Albury, New South Wales. --ScottDavis 02:32, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted reference to Gold Cup as it was in same para as Golden Throw which was nonsense.  I have now resinserted ref back in Albury article and redirected this stub there. --AYArktos 01:33, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better. Thanks. --ScottDavis 02:56, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Estella Marie Thompson

message: This woman is female but referred to using male pronouns.  Should be fixed.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.106.208.130 (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender

message: On May 19, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Divine Brown for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:28, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: I've tagged the mugshots as replaceable.  Please leave the tags on display in the article so that others will be aware that the pictures are to be deleted soon. --Tony Sidaway 06:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaceable

message: I removed the story about Divine Brown suing Hugh Grant for support of their illegitimate child "Tyrone Grant". I found no reference of this, so it looks like bullshit. As far as I know, Ms Brown's only intercourse with Hugh Grant consisted of oral sex, so unless she is some kind of mutant, I find it very unlikely that she became pregnant with his child. Wedineinheck (talk) 19:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegitimate child 

message: I added a couple of missing TV appearances.  --Levontaun (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional TV Appearances
Talk:Another Day on Earth

message: I just noticed that the album info-box says "LP". Has it really been released on vinyl? --BNutzer 15:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see that it says "LP" anywhere on the main page.  However, it's not unusual even now for albums to be released in a vinyl version Here's an amazon link for a limited-edition vinyl version of My Life in the Bush of Ghosts.  I haven't heard of a vinyl versions of ADoE, but that doesn't mean it's not out there...  --Register allocation 22:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LP by Brian Eno? 

message: How does the version of "Under" on this album relate to the version released on the Vocal box set (link)?  Is it the same song, a complete re-recording, or something inbetween?  --Register allocation 22:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Under" 
Talk:Of Human Bondage

message: Dave59’s points all seem valid to me. It might also help people to know two key bits of autobiography. One is that Maugham was plagued by a stammer, which he transfers to Philip as a clubfoot. The other is that his sexual orientation was homosexual, then illegal in the UK, so we can read a lot into Philip’s relationships with women and with other men.
The Lawless One (talk) 10:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I reverted this removal because I couldn't see the problem with the summary.  If there's a specific problem, I'd recommend explaining what it is and removing only the problematic sentences, rather than removing the section wholesale.  Thanks, delldot talk 16:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Being bold is no excuse for unexplained removal. "didn't think it was good enough" doesn't come close to being an explanation. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 17:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Wow, excellent explanation.  I'm in a bit of a bind since I haven't read the book at all.  I went through and changed wording to try and deal with your concerns, but I wasn't able to address everything.  We should find someone who's read the book recently and who's willing to vet it.  Or at least a good summary.  Thanks for catching this!  delldot talk 21:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I stuck a  tag under plot summary, so hopefully that will bring folks' attention to the issue.  It'll include the article in :Category:Accuracy disputes, so hopefully that will help.  delldot talk 21:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting

message: If it's truly a cover of the first edition, which was published in 1915, then Template:PD-US would apply (pre-1923 publication) at a minimum, if not Template:PD-text.  However, it's not just a flat scan of the cover, but a photograph of the book at an angle, which means that the photograph is of a 3-D object and is itself independently copyrightable.  I don't see a claim to using someone else's photograph of the book, which would count as replaceable under WP:NFCC.  The image should be replaced with a flat scan of the cover (or dust jacket preferably, if there was one) or a user-created photograph of the book if you want to show the spine as well as the front cover.  postdlf (talk) 01:10, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover image
Talk:Goods and Services Tax (New Zealand)

message: The government in 1989 was the fourth Labour government not a National Party government 125.237.195.251 (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect government referred to regarding GST increase to 12.5%
Talk:A Global Threat

message: I am unable to access live internet (excluding Wikipedia)... I think there should be at least one band picture up. If someone could do that, it would be greatly appreciated by me, as well as others.
Thanks,
ForcedInduction 17:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I noticed some vandalism on the page 
thanks Catalytic chrisT 03:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please watch page
Talk:Alcubierre drive/Archive 2

message: I don't know very much about relativity, special or general; I'm only looking at this page as a result of my interests in science fiction.  I must say, though, that this is an impressively heated intellectual discussion, and I have read through nearly all of it and am still very confused about what you all are actually arguing about.
KED's position, as best I can tell, is more or less: "In theory, the Alcubierre Metric would allow an object to travel faster than the speed of light without violating Einstein's Theory of Relativity. But everybody knows that Einstein's Theory of Relativity shows that it is impossible to travel faster than the speed of light; Therefore the Alcubierre Metric violates Einstein's Theory of Relativity, and so a disclaimer must be put into this article to the effect that the Alcubierre Metric is self-contradictory and false."
Everybody else's position seems to be, more or less: "KED, would you please actually read what you just wrote?"
Am I interpreting all this correctly? Or am I misunderstanding something? 
--Robin Moshe 22:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Layman Comments:
Talk:Consumer eugenics

message: On May 19, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Consumer eugenics for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:46, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: This topic gets a few unique google hits (~300), but it covers so little ground that it needs to be merged into Eugenics. Magdela 15:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:This Is Not a Test!

message: Any objections to moving it to This Is Not a Test! (album)?? When I saw this article in RC, I thought it was a newbie working with a test page wanting people to think it's not a test. Georgia guy 17:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page 

message: I can't seem to find the booklet of the album and I'm having trouble finding the producers for the songs. If anyone could add them, it would be helpful. DiverseMentality 04:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producers
Talk:Bubs

message: He sounds totally black.
So.
So maybe that should be added to the article. None of the other characters sound black.
Maybe it shouldn't be added to the article. —BazookaJoe 00:39, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds Black 

message: I don't know about the sounding black discussion but the dialect, the chicken references, the obesity and being a character shown to "break dance," I'm just lead to the belief that this is the case. 24.187.77.211 04:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist caricature
Talk:Oblasts of Russia

message: Many if not all of the numbers on the map seem to not match the ones on the list. Workster (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  A bit late but stating that map has been fixed since June 2017 -glove- (talk) 02:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers on map are incorrect 

message: I'm just asking why Donetsk People's Republic and Lugansk People's Republic aren't included. Patriciogetsongettingridofhiswiki (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Kherson and Zaporizzhia remain oblasts. They are mentioned in the text, so I added them to the number in the infobox as 'claimed'. Regardless of politics, people looking at the number in the infobox are going to want to know whether it includes the occupied territories or not. — kwami (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newly annexed territories 

message: Am I the only one who thinks numbering the oblasts  is entirely unhelpful? It makes one jump between each side of the map for no real reason. wound theology◈ 06:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering on map
Talk:K'Vort class starship

message: It is accepted policy to merge stuff like this.  Please see the following links. 
* Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Hokule%27a_class_starship
* Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Klingon_ship_classes
Also please see the List of Star Trek races page which was formed from a number of stub pages which were merged. AlistairMcMillan 03:41, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Wikipedia:Fiction. AlistairMcMillan 03:58, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Portable hole

message: Portable holes in all D&D campaigns I've been in took objects with them when folded up, as opposed to leaving them buried in the ground. This was one of the main points of usefulness of the hole (carrying vast amounts of equipment or treasure around with zero encumberance). This is explicitly described in some editions of the DMG (mentioning, among other things, a telescoping tower as an example of field equipment stored). Any references for the "leaving buried" mode of operation? --Christopher Thomas 03:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Portable holes in D&D

message: I know the Portable Hole didn't originate in D&D, as I remember a Looney Tunes/Merrie Melodies cartoon about a scientist whose invention was stolen by a thief. In the cartoon, the Portable Hole was a black substance that could be pumped out onto a surface, where it begame a hole.  The hole could then be picked up and placed as needed. In the end, the scientist makes one last hole, which he tosses on the ground in the path of his nagging wife.  Unfortunately, the hole was too deep, as the Devil comes up and dumps her back on the floor, saying that it's "bad enough down there without her!"
Unfortunately, I forgot the name of the cartoon. SAMAS 21:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the Hole 

message: Does anyone thing it would be worth linking Portal (video game) to this article?
Elaverick 23:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal - VG 

message: morph (the brown plasticine guy (he might have been in smart)) has a portable hole which he uses to dispose of a radio81.108.233.59 (talk) 08:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  morph 

message: I have heard a stick on tab with a hole in it, used in retail to make items that do not have a hole for placing on a peg peg-able, called a "portable hole." Should this usage be mentioned in this article? Wikipedia seems a little geek-heavy sometimes (although I understand why) and a little light on retail.
IsaacSapphire (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: oops. It was a typo in the patent digest book. The full patent uses "portable pole" Staszek Lem (talk) 16:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other use of the term 

message: I think it's clear that this is a notable topic.  There's no doubt the article is a mess, and a magnet for unsourced trivia.  But, WP:AfD is not for cleanup, and neither is WP:PROD.  -- RoySmith (talk) 02:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed PROD
Talk:St Edward's School, Oxford

message: In the "Alumni (OSE)" section, consider adding 'David Case, audio books reader'  Mr. Case's WIKI page is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Frederick_Case 2604:B200:4:71:D5AF:AB51:698E:9255 (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thank you for this suggestion. MPS1992 (talk) 21:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2018 