lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Corfu incident

message: Should be info somewhere on the seperate Corfu Channel incident -- see  United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_22 for a reference... AnonMoos 15:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We'll never know who killed Tellini, but many sources say it was Greek nationalist. I brought one of them. Ruches says it was Albanians, but I can't see the page. I entered "verify" there, but Ruches is everywhere in Wikipedia telling us how bad Albanians were, so I would say he's not that reliable anyways.--sulmues (talk)  14:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't see Ruches' page 

message: Tellini, Major Luigi Corti, Lieutenant Mario Bonacini, Albanian interpreter Thanas Gheziri and the chauffeur Remigio Farnetti 84.68.104.194 (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties should include the victims of the assassination
Talk:Damien Perquis

message: A person born in France as a French citizen, having French parents, speaking French and living only in French culture and not speaking Polish is not Polish, but French. So the category "Polish footballer" gives a false idea, but the definition "French footballer who after receiving the Polish citizenship plays for Poland's national team" is absolutely correct and therefor to be preferred. X-Darg (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 
Talk:Cormus domestica

message: "The Romans called the drink cerevisia from which the name 'Service' is derived (as well as the Spanish word cerveza, beer)."
:I could't find any source for that!--85.25.106.238
::That's because it's not true, as far as I can tell. Here's the real etymology. Thanks for spotting that. —Keenan Pepper 14:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology (title added) 

message: Can we add the IUCN status for S.domestica to the taxobox, i'm assuming its Least Concern? 84.9.33.255 03:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  status 

message: According to The Plant List, the correct of this species should be Cormus domestica. MKwek (talk) 06:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name

message: Should some mention be made of this tree as the source of wood used for tool making? See the catalogue here:  https://dneis.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/auxminesdesuede1929.pdf where various planes for instance are shown as being made from 'cormier' which is the wood of this tree. I have two of these planes (photos available if desired) and can testify to the density and hardness of the wood. Given the pricing in the catalogue, where cormier planes are shown as 50% more expensive than hornbeam equivalents, it must have been greatly valued, and this use would evidently have been of commercial importance.
UnNovel (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other uses
Talk:Constantine I of Greece

message: Can we assume that his birth date "2 August 1868" was a date in the then-applying Julian calendar, and that the appropriate Gregorian date is 14 August 1868?  --  JackofOz (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification.  --  JackofOz (talk) 12:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Julian Calendar?

message: At present, the section starts by telling us that the claim that he was a German sympathiser was Alled and Venizelist propaganda. Later the article tells us he was a German sympathiser. Neither claim is properly sourced. Wikipedia has procedures for dealing with such conflicting views (something like indicate there is a controversy and which view is supported by the majority of reliable sources, and document the views roughly in proportion to their relative support among the reliable sources) which should be applied here but have not been. I have neither the time nor the interest to try to fix the matter myself, but somebody who is interested should try to do so. I may or may not put in a couple of citation requests to try to encourage the process to get started. Tlhslobus (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW I section currently contradicts itself on whether he was a german sympathiser  
Talk:Incident at Petrich

message: Except this source: "The History of Greece", by Elaine Thomopoulos, p.110 (http://books.google.gr/books?id=a9qZdkXqoPMC&printsec=frontcover&hl=el#v=onepage&q&f=false), is there any other source which say that this incident was called "War of the Stray Dog"?
Because i can't find anything else.
In addition the book is written at 2011 which is after the creation of this wiki article and i am afraid that, maybe, the author is influenced by the wiki article because she doesn't mention any of her sources. Gre regiment (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: War of the Stray Dog

message: The article in the paragraph: "International intervention", say that: "Bulgaria ordered its troops to provide only token resistance, trusting the League of Nations to settle the dispute. Otherwise some chetas of Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (IMRO), together with the sentries, organised defence lines against the Greeks near Petrich, which prevented the Greeks from entering the town.", but in this article of that time in the Australian Newspaper "The Barrier Miner" says that: "The town of Petrich is officially reported captured by the Greeks." (http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/45913264?searchTerm=Incident%20at%20Petrich&searchLimits=) (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2013(UTC)
If I see, no. Jingiby (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Petrich captured?

message: Please use only reliable sources. Check especially  reliable sources in history. Old newspapers are not. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 14:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources

message: Where's the Bulgarian version of events?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jotaro97 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems kind of biased 

message: The incident arose at Demir Kapia, a small pass on the border high in the maintain. Ano Poroia has nothing to do with it. This village is on the footsteps of Belasitsa on Greek territory, not at the place of the incident. Keep in mind also, that Greek Army entered Bulgaria, not Bulgarian Army Greece. X. Basileiadis is for now just fictional name. Provide sources for that name and discuss on talk the role Ano Poroia played in that conflict, please Jingiby (talk) 16:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ano Poroia 

message: I would like to change the "result" section above the belligerence, as the conflict was won militarily by Greece but politically by Bulgaria, who appealed to the league of nations. Master14GMD (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2022
Talk:Cynthia Cooper (accountant)

message: I believe parts of this article are lifted from this source:
http://www.pcaw.co.uk/about/whistleblowers.html
I don't want to rewrite this article until someone confirms what I have found. Pgrote (talk) 20:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the plagiarized material. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. Kaldari (talk) 21:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: The actions for which Mrs. Cooper is famous do not seem to meet the definition of activism, and this category should be removed from the article.  It was not "intentional action to bring about social or political change."  She was, in her own words, doing her job.
Any discusssion?
--AndersW (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an activist 
Talk:George II of Greece

message: Using what little Greek I know, I think the Greek WP article says, in the text of the article, that he was born 7 July (Old Style) = 19 July (New Style) 1890.  That makes sense, because there was a 12-day gap between the calendars in the 19th century.  But their infobox says 20 July.  That doesn't hang together.  I'm trying to establish exactly when he was born in the Old Style calendar then prevailing, but the Greek article turned out to be not much help.  Does anyone know for sure?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect this has arisen because he was born on 7 July 1890 OS and Greece shifted calendars in 1923, so that year the anniversary of his birth was shifted to 20 July NS (7 + 13 days), whereas he was actually born on the day that was 7/19 July 1890. DrKay (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: In the section "Second exile" (third paragraph) it is written that the king and Ms. Walch met in India in 1934. According to historian Marlene Eilers Koenig (also a source here) he met her two years prior in London. Maybe this should be clarified? Glamourqueen (talk) 14:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joyce Wallach
Talk:Jack Ass

message: The article is very focused on the topic it writes about, the person, Jack Ass. I'm not sure why it wouldn't be considered that way. If someone ran across the name Jack Ass, which there's a good chance they might, there's a good chance they would come to Wikipedia for more information like I did. Above all, it's funny.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs92 (talk • contribs) 
*This would probably be better off as part of the main Jackass (TV series) article, rather than on its own.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 00:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jan Tęczyński

message: ----
The article looked like this when I started cleaning it up:
***
:This page contains titles in Polish that are explained at Offices in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Jan Tęczyński can refer to several members of the Tęczyński family of Topór Coat of Arms:
* Jan Tęczyński (d. 1405), castellan of Wojnice and Kraków, starost of Kraków and Sieradz and steward at the court of King Jadwiga of Poland. He married his first wife, Anna, sometime after 1400 and the second one sometime prior to 1404.
* Jan Tęczyński (?-1470), chamberlain of Kraków in 1415, castellan and starost of Biecz in 1434, castellan of Wojnice in 1435, voivode of Sandomierz in 1438, of Kraków in 1438, castellan of Kraków in 1458; married to Barbara (Dabrowska?).
* Jan Tęczyński (?-1498/1499) z Rabsztyna, kasztelan zawichostarosta 1479, kasztelan wislicki (1483-90), starosta sandomierski; m. Barbara z Koninskiej Woli (+after 1507)
* Jan Tęczyński (?-1505) also Jan Rabsztynski, marszalek nadworny koronny 1502, starosta sandomierski i plocki, m. Barbara ze Sprowy (z Sienna?) (+after 1507)
* Jan Tęczyński (1485-1553), married to Dobrochna Sapiezanka/Dobrochna Sapieha in 1512, podkomorzy sandomierski 1515, kasztelan lubelski 1518, marszalek nadworny 1522, kasztelan wojnicki 1535, wojewoda sandomierski 1543, starosta lubelski, lelowski, belski, trembowelski, *ca 1485, +1553; 
* Jan Tęczyński (1492-1541), miecznik krakowski i podkomorzy chelmski 1515, kasztelan chelmski 1525, wojewoda belski 1528, wojewoda podolski 1533, wojewoda ruski 1536, wojewoda sandomierski 1537, starosta belski, chelmski, krasnostawski, ratnenski,, married to Katarzyna Łaska in 1521
* Jan Tęczyński (?-1593) podkomorzy krakowski, podkomorzy wielki koronny, kasztelan wojnicki 1571, starosta lubelski, rohatynski, parczowski, +1593, father of Jan Tęczyński (1581-1637)
* Jan Tęczyński (1581-1637), wojewoda krakowski (1620-1637), czesnik koronny 1618, starosta plocki, m.1606 Dorota Minska
***
I am unsure of the word zawichostarosta and have marked my translation with a question mark. Please correct and delete as necessary. -Yupik 23:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Students Islamic Organisation of India

message: 2 different citation styles are being used in this article which leads the same foot-note number being used for unrelated footnotes.  Please use a single citation style.  --BostonMA 23:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation styles 

message: What is the use of this kind of over tagging. According to WP:OVERTAG, Placing too many tags on an article is "tag-bombing", disruptive, or may be a violation of Do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. So keep maximum two tags in the article, which is most appropriate.--Irshadpp (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was astonished to see these much tags on the article, tags like notability and GNG are completely WP:Attack. I have just checked the article and updated it with two relevant tags. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over tagged
Talk:John Mirak

message: Does this person merit a page?
:I think not.He is not notable, a car seller only. We can find millions of people like this.Must.T  C  04:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makalp this is not the place for you thoughts, there is a rule for that and its called No Original Research, as for his notability his was a successful businesses owner, Armenian genocide survivor and a prominent Armenian-American. VartanM 14:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Infrared cleaning

message: Do not merge. these are different topics, Antennaman 23:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know enough about the topics in depth, but could you clarify? Girolamo Savonarola 22:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well, infrared cleaning is a good article name for the generic process.  the trademarked info from ICE could be merged into infrared cleaning.  but digital image enhancement is a much broader technology involving all sorts of photo-alteration and enhancement and needs a separate article: perhaps that article should just be called image enhancement. Antennaman 05:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: It would make sense to add a reference link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_ICE And this post. Both articles overlap widely, including (mostly defunct) external links. 109.42.115.129 (talk) 10:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Daniel Braid

message: Please provide a source for this hyperbolic statement:
"Braid has been known for his vast charity work, often jetting overseas to help poor orphans within Uganda. World Vision advocate Tim Costello has praised such work, even suggesting Braid be nominated for Australian of the Year." 
I've also removed some other dubious statements and doubtful changes. Please provide sources for any alterations or additions, or discuss here. wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 02:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charity work (source?)
Talk:Daniel Dolan

message: "Traditional" is subjective. The term seems to be used in sedevacantist circles in preference, for some reason, to "traditionalist." Either way, they are subjective adjectives and this is not an in-house biog for members of the church. There could be an argument to replace it with "Sedevacantist Catholic Bishop" or "Sedevacantist Bishop." Apollinari (talk) 16:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Traditional Catholic Bishop" Change
Talk:Daniel M. Petrocelli

message: This editor keeps trying to delete the substance of the N.Y. Times article in which one of Harvey Weinstein's victims recounts a horrifying experience with Mr. Petrocelli. 
First attempt: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_M._Petrocelli&type=revision&diff=938185522&oldid=938184510
Second attempt: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_M._Petrocelli&type=revision&diff=941956864&oldid=940471956
Please stop trying to delete information that is critical of Mr. Petrocelli. Wikipedia is not a publicity website. The information was in the N.Y. Times, which is as authoritative a periodical as there is. The editor claims it's "WP:LIBEL" but that's for courts to decide, not you, and Mr. Petrocelli has never filed a lawsuit against the N.Y.Times over the story. His response to their reporter was, "no comment."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beyondabove14 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Beyondabove14  , you need to familiarize yourself with WP:LIBEL, it's when an accusation is made and accusations are not for Wikipedia. WP:COPYVIO means it is a cut and paste job and when you look at the source it is taken verbatim from the article. Not sure why the bots didn't pick up on that. MattyMetalFan (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone keeps trying to delete what the New York Times reported re Weinstein 

message: This article cites a number of sources in which the information conveyed in the article does not match the information presented in the original source, instead it adds embellishments that cause the article to read similar to a resume. I have marked a couple of these. Further verification efforts are hindered by a number of broken links, these too need updated and verified. 
On tracing the edit history I found a number of major contributors who have been banned due to sock-puppetry and suspected ties to paid-edit work. I'm not suggesting that this is the case for the entire, or even majority of content, but I think it signals the need for a review, verification of sources and updates that present a broader view of the subject. 
As another editor pointed out, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not intended for publicity or promotion. I hope other editors might join in and check whether the sources match the articles claims. Sadke4 (talk) 11:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns - Publicity, Promotion, Source Verification.
Talk:Daniel N. Robinson

message: Everyone has their own definition to love.  Everyone is wrong. There is only one definition to love but it is different for everyone in the world. Nobody knows what love is until you fall in love. What you fall in love with is a person. The person is the reason you fall in love. You wouldn't know what I love is without this person.  So this person that you fall in love with in the reason you fall in love, is the reason you know what love is, so this person you are in love with is no longer John or Jane but Love. The person has become love and that person that has become love is the definition to love to you.  The definition to love is the person you fall in love with and everyone falls in love with someone different. 2600:6C58:4D3F:4E8C:2035:6AD0:6C78:3B44 (talk) 08:50, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The definition to Love.  (In Love)
Talk:Chrysler LH engine

message: The 2.7 was built in AMC's home town of Kenosha? That's interesting. Any chance it was built in the old AMC plant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infinitrium (talk • contribs) Revision as of 19:22, 10 September 2006
Shouldn't this be in with the 3.5, 3.3, and 3.2 engines? They're all the same family.Davert (talk) 23:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Built in Kenosha?

message: I respectfully disagree with the recent edits to this & other related model pages that have removed all mention of the 2.7L V6 oil sludge defect. The issue has received widespread news coverage; there has been testimony about Chrysler oil sludge in front of Congress; there are five class action lawsuits pending.
Also regarding the most recent edit that resulted in:
> Earlier models of these engines have known problems with the timing chain tensioner, which Chrysler revised in 2002.[3][4][5]
.. the three footnotes referenced do not support the preceding statement.
Jmathis555 (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oil Sludge 

message: Are these engines related ?  The Hyundai and Chrysler engines have the same bore and capacity which seems a bit coincidental.
The Rover KV6 was used in the Kia Carnival, and then a 2.7L V6 was installed which seems very similar in design.  And Chrysler just happened to produce a similar engine at the same time.
They even have the same problems ; oil sludge accumulation.203.26.122.12 (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrysler LH, Hyundai Delta engine and Rover KV6 
Talk:Far West, Missouri

message: I added a  to the claim of Far West being where Cain killed Abel. I looked and looked but found nothing to support it. If nobody adds a citation soon, I will delete it. Pahoran513 23:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Centaurea cineraria

message: Wild Flowers of the Mediterranean by Marjorie Blamey and Christopher Grey-Wilson (2nd ed., Bloomsbury, London, 2004) states that the flowers are purple. The Royal Horticultural Society Plant Finder also gives purple as the colour (see https://www.rhs.org.uk/Plants/75483/Centaurea-cineraria-subsp-cineraria/Details). The picture on the Encyclopedia of Life page that's cited in the article (https://eol.org/pages/467765) seems to be Jacobaea maritima (older name Senecio cineraria). However, the picture at https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/centaurea-cineraria/ definitely looks like a yellow Centaurea.14:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Follow-up
Talk:Danielle Dax

message: My friend Gillian Gaar (who wrote the book She's a Rebel: The History of Women in Rock & Roll, among other things) says there are quite a few errors in this article. I don't know enough about Dax to feel comfortable editing, and not all of this is thoroughly cited (do note, though, that the dates are, if a big vaguely), but I'd be mildly amazed if any of this is wrong: she knows her stuff.
What follows is paraphrased from Gillian. The passages in quotations are from the current article.
“Dax then left The Lemon Kittens and embarked on a solo career, recording and producing the albums Pop-Eyes (1982), Jesus Egg That Wept (1984), and Inky Bloaters (1987) on her own label, Awesome Records. In 1988 she signed with Sire Records, which released her double album Dark Adapted Eye, containing material from her previous recordings, such as the well-known song "Big Hollow Man", and included the new and un-released recordings "Cat-House", "White Knuckle Ride", "When I Was Young", "House Cat", "Whistling for His Love", and "Touch Piggy's Eyes".”
*Dark Adapted Eye is not a double album. It is a single album with 12 tracks. My source — the actual vinyl album. The CD and cassette do have 19 songs however and on vinyl that would be a double album. Perhaps that explains the error (whoever wrote this having the CD and assuming the same tracks appeared on the vinyl version).
“new and un-released recordings "Cat-House", "White Knuckle Ride", "When I Was Young", "House Cat", "Whistling for His Love", and "Touch Piggy's Eyes".”
*Most of these songs were already released in the UK and thus are not “new and unreleased.”
*Cat House was first released in the UK as a single in April 1988.
*When I Was Young was first released in the UK on the 12 inch single of Where The Flies Are in October 1986.
*House Cat was first released in the UK on the 12 inch single of Cat House in April 1988.
*Touch Piggy’s Eyes was first released in the UK on the 7 and 12 inch single of Cat House in April 1988.
*It was the first appearance of these versions of White Knuckle Ride and Whistling For His Love though. These two songs were not released in the UK until April 1989. An earlier version of Whistling does appear on the 1987 Japanese EP The Chemical Wedding, however.
All the dates were taken from an article on Danielle in the UK mag Record Collector, November 1989, by Mark Paytress.
- 06:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from Gillian Gaar: Errors in Danielle Dax entry
Talk:Danijel Pranjić

message: I removed "Pranjić will sign for Liverpool FC upon the opening of the summer transfer window." This is unsourced transfer speculation and Wikipedia isnt the place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Footix2 (talk • contribs) 08:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liverpool 