lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of land vehicles of the United States Armed Forces

message: Shouldn't airplanes and helicopters and the like be included under the heading "vehicles"?
:Well that was not why I started the list.  So no.  If this is an issue in terms of language then I would recommend renaming the article to land vehicles of the US Armed Forces.  -- Thatguy96 00:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just saw that one of my favorite vehicles (the M42 Duster) was missing, so I added it.  Specifically, I added it under the Anti-aircraft self-propelled guns, as the Duster was, indeed, designed as a SPAAG.  However, it was most famously used for heavy ground-fire support in the Vietnam war.  This leads me to a question: Should vehicles be categorized under their designed use, or their operational use?
**I, for one, would not object to adding "land" to the title.  Yes, it's pendantic, but aircraft, boats, et al, are "vehicles."  (Though, I suspect no one would be confused about this.)  Reimelt 18:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to say designed use.  The operation use should be covered in the relevant article. I am also going to change the name. - Thatguy96 19:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to categorize: Operational Use vs. Designed Use 

message: is the stryker MGS considered a tank? QZX —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.244.229.225 (talk) 22:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From the Wikipedia article Tank "A tank is a tracked armoured combat vehicle designed to engage enemies head-on, using direct fire from a large-calibre gun and supporting fire from machine guns. Heavy armour as well as a high degree of mobility give it survivability, while the tracks allow it to cross even rough terrain at high speeds." As the Stryker is a wheeled vehicle without heavy armor, I would have to say no. It does meet the requirements for a mobile gun system, hence its nomenclature. Zharmad (talk) 17:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  stryker light tank? 

message: Is dragon fire a mortar or a vehicle? On the dragon fires article it says it can be towed by a HMMWV or mounted on a LAV which would make it sound like its not a vehicle.  If no one disagrees I'll remove it from the list. Sean0987 (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dragon fire 

message: This list is screwed up, many of the vehicles have been removed and the categories have been mixed, and when I tried to revert it back to it's previous form, someone accused me of vandalism, (I know I did poorly but I'm not good at this) Could someone who knows better fix this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.142.213 (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the list be reverted to this version? The current list sticks a whole bunch of light recon vehicles under the MBT category. --Edward Sandstig (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  something's wrong... 

message: list seems redundant, theres already an M-list, unless its purpose is to recatagorize the M-list into tanks, trucks, apc's, trailers, ect.Brian in denver (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: list purpose?
Talk:Bethabara, North Carolina

message: Old Town and Bethabara are one and the same place.  Just two names.  Bethabara was the original name, fell into disuse once the town began to dwindle, thus the name Old Town was adopted and the post office changed its name in 1835 from Bethabara to Old Town.  I think we should merge these two entries together and develop a fuller article on the one location.  Most locals refer to the neighborhood as Old Town so I suggest a consolidated article under the name Old Town that includes a great history section on the Bethabara days and mentions the current park and preserved buildings and all as well as being a currently "annexed place" in NC.  Thoughts?  -- Naytchrboy 17:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The two are not the same. What reliable source says this?⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 02:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if they can be considered the same; however, USGS topographic maps place "Old Town" in Historic Bethabara.  –Sparkgap (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a good map....and it is the other way around. Try this map and zoom in several times. Notice that red balloon is in Old Town. Bethabara is a small site in the much larger area of Old Town. When people say "Old Town" in the WS area, they mean the area around Hwy 67 (Reynolda Rd.) None mean Bethabara. To imply they are the same will get you funny looks. (Note:They have Giant shopping center (Loehman's Plaza) and Oldtown Shopping Center labeled in reverse...)⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with Old Town

message: I find myself somewhere I did not want to be, but these two articles need to at least acknowledge each other... dm (talk) 05:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support.  They are the same topic.  –Sparkgap (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

text: Support...and merged.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:11, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Bethbara Historic District
Talk:Nico Mastorakis

message: A totally biased article deprived of reference. Mastorakis is a great director who deserves something better. Referring to the Junta (coup d'etat) events, the editor here makes his own assumptions and this section is impregnated with prejudice, like the rest of the article. 84.205.241.2 (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased
Talk:Beulaville, North Carolina

message: Why were my edits reverted? They were all true to the source and were mainly just corrections. CodyHoward1285 (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted
Talk:John Hertz (fan)

message: :I based my edits on the bio that Mr Hertz provided for a recent convention. The older bio spoke only of his choreography, not to the whole body of works making Mr Hertz a little cross. His inclusion in an encyclopeda must be based on his contributions that are both notable and verifiable. His Hugo nomination and fan wrtiting are both notable and verifiable, and should be the crux of the article. 
:If you have more verifiable info regarding his work with regency dance, please add it! However his classification/disambiguation of Fan still stands for me. -Dr Haggis - Talk 22:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know what, if anything, Vanamonde means?  —Tamfang 08:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the name of a disembodied artificial intelligence featured in Arthur C Clarke's sf novel The City and the Stars. --DeafMan 15:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many thanks!  —Tamfang 04:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology 
Talk:Core temperature

message: I think this article could be made more useful by including information about how much (if at all) core body temperature in humans varies from time to time, or from individual to individual, and about how accurate the figure given is. -- Grgcox 16:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you'll find that information in Fever.  I believe that the answer is ±0.7 degrees C per day (temperature measured at the same time of day, every day, for many days), with about as much again during the day (lowest body temperature to highest body temperature if you checked every hour around the clock).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variation and accuracy 

message: "It's important to mention that core temperature is same for measuring in different ways."
What?? --24.68.50.92 (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hmm 

message: This page has been merged into Normal human body temperature. --Scray (talk) 04:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Biltmore Forest, North Carolina

message: just because  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.2.155.30 (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

message: Keith Schuler Wikipietime (talk) 07:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people section
Talk:Moscow School of painting, sculpture and architecture

message: Why exactly are "painting, sculpture and architecture" uncapitalized in the title?  Surely it should be "Painting, Sculpture and Architecture" Erudy 22:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - I'll rename it.--Mcginnly | Natter 00:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title
Talk:Black Mountain, North Carolina

message: I removed the "citation needed" in the section on One Second After.  The book itself is referenced as the citation, unless the comment was pointed towards the story being fictional, which the book itself would also seem to resolve. 72.86.42.38 (talk) 09:46, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Second After reference 
Talk:Black Mountains (North Carolina)

message: What is the etymology of name "Black Mountain"? they are green on pictures... What is possibility, that name is connected with Serbian settlers from European region, known as "Crna Gora-Montenegro-Black Mountain"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.140.149.198 (talk) 23:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of mountains 

message: Where exactly are the Black Mountains in this image?  Is that them on the left along the horizon?  Is this a view from one of the Blacks?  The Blacks have a fairly distinctive crest, and I don't see it in this image.  Bms4880 (talk) 20:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede image 

message: I'm not a specialist in this area so hopefully someone with some knowledge could add some references to support these environmental statements (similarly on the Mount Mitchell article) please?  For example the statement that "In some recent studies, individual Fraser fir trees which are resistant to the Adelgid have been found" should list those studies.  The Balsam woolly adelgid article doesn't mention these studies and I would be very interested in reading them. Sdenny123 (talk) 03:12, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Environmental threats
Talk:John D. Hannah

message: Keep the article! This man is a professor at a famous university. We need his information. (LonghornJohnny 23:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:American Civil War/Featured article

message: The following are all subject matter articles which have achieved FA status. In order to honor the hard work contributors and editors have made in each case, I intend to use each of these articles in the below order before any FA's created after the following date stamp unless the members of the ACW task force wish to endorse another candidate.
* Abraham Lincoln (Third quarter, 2006)
* Dred Scott v. Sandford (Fourth quarter, 2006)
* Battle of Hampton Roads (First quarter, 2007)
* Dixie (song) (Second quarter, 2007)
* William Tecumseh Sherman (Third quarter, 2007)
* Ku Klux Klan (Fourth quarter, 2007)
* Gettysburg Address (First quarter, 2008)
Unless otherwise stated, I'll copy the introduction from the article at the beginning of each quarter, and while we may copy edit this a bit, especially for context and wikifying, I'll ask users to help us maintain a relatively stable version for the quarter, asking users to make their changes on the article, not this pointer toward that article. BusterD 23:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: American Civil War portal Featured article page

message: Looks like ACW Task force has fair number of FAs now, and rate of new FA has increased enough where I feel pretty good about making this change. I'll be posting the rotation in the queue before year's end, and will make the change on 1/1/8. BusterD 00:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing portal "Featured article" to a monthly (instead of quarterly) rotation 

message: #Battle of Hampton Roads (January, 2008)
#Gettysburg Address (February, 2008)
#George B. McClellan (March, 2008)
#Ku Klux Klan (April, 2008)
#Ironclad warship (May, 2008)
#Battle of Shiloh (June, 2008)
#Lawrence Sullivan Ross (July, 2008)
#Confederate government of Kentucky (August, 2008)
#Winfield Scott Hancock (September, 2008)
#Uncle Tom's Cabin (October, 2008)
#Thomas C. Hindman (November, 2008)
#Harriet Tubman (December, 2008)
Tried to mix up north and south, bio and battle and background. If no one objects, I'll implement this for Jan 1. BusterD (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Here's my proposed FA Queue for 2008
Talk:Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.canuxploitation.com/review/ilsa.html, http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/ilsacollection.php. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NortyNort  (Holla) 13:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: "The credited editor, Kurt Schnit, was likely also a pseudonym" - I realise this verges on OR, but it seems a shame not to point out that the name is a rather good pun, confirming that it's certainly a pseudonym. Curt = short, Schnitt = German for cut. Edited by Short Cut. Geddit? --82.39.240.18 (talk) 08:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Likely pseudonymous" 

message: She's mentioned at 40m50s in "Slow Horses" s04e02 2A02:C7F:2D04:8600:C117:E014:7E99:A168 (talk) 21:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow Horses
Talk:Grid illusion

message: ugh, this is what we looked at in Adv.Geometry to today for about ten minutes.andrew 23:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gobbledegook

message: Does anyone else have the white version of the grid in this article "not work" for them?  The others do.  That's odd....  *Vendetta* (whois talk edits) 04:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  White grid 

message: Can somebody replace the Hermann grid image? It has been replaced with a scintillating grid and the original file deleted. Famousdog 13:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: removing entire sections due to rogue elements or additions is explicitly advised against. If someone's gallery is bad, then you strike IT, not 5 other sections unrelated to their mess.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.59.193 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 29 February 2008
:But if the other material is speculation and original research (see WP:NOR) then not only was it not WP:Cited, but you even confimed "unkown", so the material is not WP:Verified and so not appropriate to include. Removal therefore within policy and guidelines, I've added a welcome note to your talk page then sets out main policies and guidelines.David Ruben  Talk  02:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When correcting additions, do it correctly 

message: proportionately, the white grid's midtone is too light, average luminosity should be either 1/3 or 2/3 total optical luminosity... aka the grid should be dark on white, but slightly brighter than mid-range on black due to wider human sensitivity to light... also sunlight is much brighter than your monitor, lcd panels typically do not work with higher resolution illusions -- I'll tell the researchers about the inquiry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.59.193 (talk) 18:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  white grid errors, intensity
Talk:Brain Game (1997 game show)

message: The rules for Brain Game have changed this year.  There are a couple minor changes, the biggest one being that teams have to wait till the end of the question to buzz in.  Here is a link to the complete rules.
I may update the page at a later date if noone else does.
--JVandezande (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brain Game Rules 
Talk:Brevard, North Carolina

message: Vandalism Fixed! RylandTownsend (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

message: There was a lot of vandalism done to this page. Undid a bunch of edits  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omarcheeseboro (talk • contribs) 18:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Bright Leaves

message: The following film critics, notable enough to have wikipedia articles of their own, reviewed this film according to http://www.metacritic.com/movie/bright-leaves/critic-reviews  Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: rough work

message: I think the current wording is misleading.
The current wording implies that the original film parallels a genuine conflict between the Duke family and the McElwee family.  If you watch the film McElwee's documents his family tradition that the feature film parallels an historical conflict.  However, my recollection is that he seems to have found the family tradition was mistaken.
Yes, I know my interpretation doesn't belong in article space.  I am not suggesting it should.  I will suggest our article should not take the family tradition at face value, when McElwee himself did not.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:11, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for discussion
Talk:Broadway, North Carolina

message: The coordinates on this page appear to be too far south. I am not sure what the actual coordinates are, but Broadway is in Lee County, NC and not in Moore County, NC as the dot on the map suggests. Dm46607 07:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Exoletus

message: This term is comparable to the modern notion of "twink death": a young gay man's fear of losing physical characteristics deemed "feminine" in men to age. Gangweedersriseup (talk) 07:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twink death
Talk:Brown Mountain (North Carolina)

message: I just read a Wikipedia article on the mirage phenomenon known as Fata Morgana, and I believe that the Brown Mountain Lights of North Carolina might be good candidates for this type of illusion. Check it out, particularly you meteorologists...Cloudy McClain, where are you?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plotdot (talk • contribs) 22:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Legends Field (Kentucky)

message: looking for a job how do I go by putting a application in 2603:6010:3003:69EB:EDB3:B183:B964:49CB (talk) 19:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Job 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 00:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Counter Clocks Field →  – Ballpark renamed after 2024 rebrand. Ezaco (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Are there reliable sources to support this? -- Pemilligan (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.lexingtonlegends.com/pages/seating-map on the website. There is no news article supporting as yet and won't be until a new naming rights sponsor is acquired. Aside from that the team is no longer the Counter Clocks so the field is not Counter Clocks Field, at best it would now be Legends Field if they decide go different from The Ballpark moniker. Ezaco (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the lack of sources is a reason for making the move. Until there are sources, leave it be. -- Pemilligan (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no sources renaming it to Counter Clocks Field either... and the team is no longer called the Counter Clocks. They are now re-named to the Legends. Definitively the field is no longer Counter Clocks Field. Ezaco (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that there was no sources renaming it to Counter Clocks Field, and I don't propose that we repeat that mistake. -- Pemilligan (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 February 2024
Talk:Buxton, North Carolina

message: is it named after Buxton Derbyshire UK? Clean Arlene (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of name
Talk:Moulsecoomb

message: Because the descriptions of all the different parts of Moulsecoomb are a bit confusing, I might try to draw a diagram or map.  Perhaps "Before and After" might be particularly useful ... I'll see.  Knowing how long it took me to draw this puts me off slightly!  Hassocks5489 13:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Dudhope Castle

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.2.19.240 (talk) 11:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to add an image, you need to upload it to Wikipedia first. Go to Wikipedia:Upload for instructions. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck 14:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas More Stadium

message: I want to explain why I've reverted your changes. Per MOS:LEADSENTENCE,  Instead, the first thing you say about Y'alls Ballpark is its past name (and I don't know what you mean by ) followed by a vague definition of the what () and then the where. You then take two paragraphs to discuss naming rights history, with the fourth paragraph making the first mention of its use for baseball, something that should be (and was) at the top. Overall, this was not an improvement to the article. -- Pemilligan (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted lead changes 

message: Hello.
I added the image of Thomas More Stadium that currently resides at the top of this page. However, as I have never done this before, I may have done it incorrectly. If so, please go ahead and correct it and let me know how I messed up, as to not let me repeat my mistake. Much appreciated, DarthVadarLikesBananas (talk) 01:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it into the Infobox which has some paramaters meant for an image. Otherwise, it would go better after/below the Infobox than before/above it. All the gory details of what order to have things in the article can be found at MOS:SECTIONORDER. -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pemilligan Thank you kind sir. Have a wonderful rest of your day, or evening, or even night. DarthVadarLikesBananas (talk) 04:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added an image.
Talk:Calabash, North Carolina

message: Hillbilly? Really?? 206.74.67.146 (talk) 20:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hillbilly grease fried??
Talk:Camden County High School (Georgia)

message: A good set of information but needs wikifying. Some refs and pics would be useful. Victuallers 07:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome