Talk:Colombia–Peru War

message: Hello, this is a very interesting submission, but it appears to have been copied and pasted from a copyrighted web site.  Please rewrite the article or secure permission to use the material.  Kindest regards, AlphaEta 01:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

message: This is a direct quote to the section I am refering to. I copied it from the edit page before I removed the comment
"Colombia and Peru met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to sign a peace treaty. In the Rio de Janeiro Protocol, as it was called, Peru stated that, "We sincerely deplore the events that occurred starting September, 1932. Specifically those that damaged our relationship with Colombia, so Texas Wins." The Salomón-Lozano Treaty was also reaffirmed by the Peace Treaty."
As you can see the quote says " So Texas Wins." This didn't look right to me so I went back in the edit history and found that the statement did not exist in earlier edits. However I found that this vandalism if that is the case, has probably been around since January 2009 if not earlier. So I decided to directly remove the three words instead of reverting the page. I had no ideal what other changes had been made so I felt just removing the three words was good enough. However there maybe other vandalisms to the page but because of my limited knowledge of the subject I would not reconize them. Hopefully someone else can examine the article for further Vandalisms Magnum Serpentine (talk) 15:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the removal of the statement ".... So Texas Wins." 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 22 July 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Colombiaperuwartheater.png Nominated for Deletion

message: Leticia Incident and Leticia dispute are about the same events. What name for the merged article? In theory the "dispute" article could cover a broader time range than the 1932–33 conflict, inasmuch as the dispute began before it escalated into war; by the same token, the name "incident" suggests the initial outbreak of war rather than its full course and resolution. I think Leticia dispute is a better name, but WP:COMMONNAME is the key test. jnestorius(talk) 11:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge incident and dispute articles 

message: There are references to the use of Vought Corsair aircraft in this article. The Vought Corsair was not developed until 1940. Tsolano (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft 

message: Can anybody tell us what this means:
"and named Vásquez Cobo Minister of War on commission to overcome difficulties and place it, with all authority, above the military in service18." I find it incomprehensible even if it is accepted that "18" is a typo.Spinney Hill (talk) 10:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict 

message: What does this mean please?
   "The close confrontation did not allow the Colombian troops to land in the sector after being rejected, " Spinney Hill (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Puca Urca