Talk:Murder of Amy Mihaljevic

message: This "list os suspects" is so completely bogus.  Not only is it not a list, but there is NO ATTRIBUTION for it.  ALSO, Dean Runkle has NOT been named as a suspect.  Renner, your stuff is interesting, but ad hominem attacks are wrong and do a disservice to the investigation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClevelandBill (talk • contribs) 20:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: He's blocked to give him a chance to read our policies. --Golbez 17:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I noticed that when I went to leave a note at his talk page after my above comment.  Looks like Tony and you have that end covered. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 17:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of suspects

message: I Don't know if this is very important, but Amy turns 31 today...Her case has been unsolved for 20 years...I feel so bad for her and her family and friends...--Boy of The Waters (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsolved case 

message: Please see the James Renner talk page about his credibility and blogspot.com reliability. 12.180.133.18 (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: my edit removing BLP section where the only source is James Renner 

message: I don’t think it is acceptable or appropriate for this article (in regards to the section on Dean Runkle). I think it should be changed but it has been reverted back in the past. What does the community think?  Basilosauridae (talk) 15:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't say it's self-promotion. From what I've seen, he's just passionate about the subject.--GouramiWatcherTalk 03:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What would you call putting a picture of yourself in an article about a murdered child? If not self promotion, definitely inappropriate and misguided at the very least. Regardless, I have deleted the section on Dean Runkle today because it wasn't supported by acceptable citations. I would support it being reinstated if sources other than Renner's personal blog can be found. Basilosauridae (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found more appropriate citations (yes, from Renner, but published), and will be putting the section back up.Basilosauridae (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe Renner himself added the image. I checked and it seems Gourami Watcher added it. Melonkelon (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am the person who added the image. Other articles have had images of a subject described in an a section of the page. --GouramiWatcherTalk 22:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this speculation about a living person who has not been formally charged in the investigation is unacceptable and a violation of WP:BLP. The whole section about Dean Runkle must be removed. I will take this to WP:BLPN. Dr. K. 22:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the section as a blatant violation of BLP, in particular WP:BLPCRIME. No source is automatically reliable for everything they print. An op/ed piece from a newspaper is not a reliable source even if the actual news articles they print are reliable. This is clearly not a neutral source, but rather the former. Even if it was a genuine news story, it still violates BLP without a conviction in the courts. I have removed it per this and WP:BLPREMOVE until better sources and a conviction is upheld. Zaereth (talk) 01:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Excellent analysis Zaereth. Thank you again. Dr. K. 02:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi all, thank you for your help and feedback. I am a little new to Wikipedia; are there places that I could go to to request advice on things like this from more seasoned wikipedians? Thanks! Basilosauridae (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  You followed the right steps, Basilosauridae, by opening a discussion on this talkpage and alerting the editors who watch this article. The only additional step you could possibly add is to post a note at WP:BLPN, as I did. For more urgent cases, such as BLP violations followed by rapid edit-warring, you can file a report at WP:ANI. Dr. K. 21:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self promotion by Renner 

message: Please see the discussion at BLPN. Dr. K. 22:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at BLPN

message: The “See Also” section is one link to the article "List of people who disappeared mysteriously". This article is not about someone who 'disappeared mysteriously' as her ultimate whereabouts and the circumstances of her abduction are, in fact, known. 
I would like to remove the link replace with one to an article about unsolved murders. Matuko (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Amy Mihaljevic was, in fact, a "person who disappeared mysteriously" ... at least briefly ... for the period of three months between her disappearance (murder) and the discovery of her body.  So, the Wikipedia link is not all that tenuous.  I can see why it was added.  I don't think it's inappropriate.  Thanks.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  At this point, that link is no longer included in the "See also" section.  That's also fine, as I see it.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion