lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KStars

message: A printed one is Astronomy Hacks that features a review/manual of KStars among other programs.--Daggerstab (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Title search

message: The "Multiple issues" warning has been up since November 2008. How long does this go on until the issues are addressed? Didn't the authors of the articles have references at hand when they wrote the article or was it written from off the top of their heads? It doesn't appear to be a very trustworthy article bereft of citations as it is. Thanks, Wordreader (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations - article in limbo
Talk:Vis major

message: According to me, it should be a natural force, not man-made. Hence, this example will not hold good.
"Its nature and power absolutely uncontrollable, for example, the inroads of a hostile army or forcible robberies, may relieve from liability from contract." This example will be covered under Force Majeure, which includes acts of man / men.
--Ruzbehraja (talk) 03:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural or man-made

message: It seems these three terms are at least partially overlapping in meaning.  And in practice, as here at Investopedia they are represented as being the same.  Clear contrasting between the terms is needed, can anyone who is knowledgeable about this area help please? --Doncram (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In Roman Law only Vis major and Casus existed, latter being man made. 178.148.72.108 (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: contrast '[[vis major]]' vs. '[[force majeure]]' vs. '[[act of god]]'
Talk:Swamp Ghost

message: The photo is of a twin-tail two engine B-25 Mitchel bomber. 2602:304:B3E1:3910:F17B:A0F9:9EF5:85FA (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Which photo??? BilCat (talk) 22:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swamp Ghost #22 

message: Why was the "[by whom?]" tag on "it was intercepted" added?  Said tag isn't necessary -- it's obvious that it would have been none other than the Japanese. Shawn D. (talk) 12:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interception
Talk:Essex Boys

message: It might be useful if there was a passing reference in this article to the wikpedia OPERATION CENTURY article which has a direct bearing on the ESSEX BOYS story. I can't recall if the tactics deployed during OPERATION CENTURY had any mention in the ESSEX BOYS film. --TheGuntz (talk) 19:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Operation Century]]

message: I see that the links (blue words) for Larry Lamb and Bill Murray connect to the (now deceased) ex-editor of The Sun newspaper and the Hollywood actor - surely not correct. RASAM (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:United States securities regulation

message: How does securities regulation in the US get to be low-importance, given that the lack of any effective US securities regulation seems to be a major part of what devastated the entire world economy over the past couple years?  And does the SEC actually legislate, or does it only rubber-stamp legislation passed by SROs such as FINRA? --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks like this article hasn't really changed much since my last substantive improvements. I was reading Marc Steinberg's Understanding Securities Law (2014) this morning - it would be a good source for the basics such as the Howey test as well as the details .... II | (t - c) 15:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understanding Securities Law 

message: In case it's of interest to the editors of this page, I'm the author of an article on securities regulation by the states, a topic that is not often covered but remains a very active area on the ground. States, for example, bring more securities enforcement actions than the SEC does. The article, State Securities Enforcement is forthcoming in the BYU Law Review and is available here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3790750.
--171.66.13.22 (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New scholarly article on state securities regulation
Talk:Myer Centre, Adelaide

message: Is the word "colossal" appropriate for the description of the Myer store in the Myer Centre? It seems either very exaggerating OR fishing-story. Would "including a large Myer store over five levels" suffice? Sem boy (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "colossal" Myer store??? 

message: I query the claim that the Myer Centre was completed & opened to the public in 1991. You're a couple years off.
I know it's incorrect because I got my very first job at 15, in the Myer Centre food court McDonald's. 
The building wasn't finished yet so we had to do our training in the (now long gone) McDs in Rundle Mall, directly opposite. (The boss Geoff Ollie owned both McDs at the time).
Our training finished up just a few days before the Myer Centre & food court were opened to the public.
It was most definitely 1993. 193.115.120.44 (talk) 13:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of opening - Correction
Talk:Martha Minow

message: This url:  http://www.law.harvard.edu/about/dean/dean-bio.html
is used as ref five times, but appears to be a redirect to a general page. Not quite a dead link, but effectively so.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Bancroft Literary Association and Carrollton-Wight Literary Society

message: It is not the case that the Bancroft Literary Association and Carrollton-Wight Literary Society is the oldest such organization at a public school in the United States. The Jefferson Literary and Debating Society was founded at the University of Virginia in 1825, more than 50 years prior to the date cited for the formation of the Bancroft Literary Association and Carrollton-Wight Literary Society. I have removed the incorrect claim. PubliusVarrus
:I understand you concern about the claim of this being the oldest literary scoiety at a public school, and reveals the need to clarify the claim.
:Baltimore City College is a high not a college, despite the implication of its name.  School was being used to refer to a non-collegiate institution.  I will restore the claim to the page, but make a note that it is not referring to colleges. Golem88991 22:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: No one, past or present calls it the Bancroft Literary Association and Carrollton-Wight Literary Society. Not one kid on the team I've ever met has called it that, and it makes no sense for...
#To have this long ass name.
#To have this article referenced in a way that only City grads would know about.
#In competitive tournaments, no one cals them that name.
I'm moving the page to Baltimore City College Speech and Debate take it up with an admin if you have a problem.Thx2005 18:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move the article...come on
File talk:Pecans.jpg

message: I like the image but the fact that this is considered the cream of images is amusing :)
75.74.26.181 04:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a better picture, feel free to freely license it and upload it to the Commons.  ShadowHalo 05:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's quite nice. Go, shelled pecans, go! Wunderbear 10:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wtf, eh?
Talk:Ballston Spa High School

message: We Need A source for them changing the name to a terrier i go to the school and never heard of that
Yboord028 04:47, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The edit was unnecessary, factually dubious, and directly violated wikipedia's NPoV policy.  Yes, I agree with *some* of the sentiments expressed, but wikipedia is simply not the place for such obviously opinionated nonsense.<BR>
SnetskyCM (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit involving New Schedule controversy 

message: I literally updated who the new principal is and the correct link to the high school webpage, and it got marked as a hoax.
Fdsafdsa132 (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax?
Talk:Ages 3 & Up

message: I plan on elaborating on this entry later...it's rather bare as of now, but if anyone can add anything, please do. Skibz777 05:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Please comment at Talk:Supernova (American band). Boleyn (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Wrought iron furniture

message: Links to related wikipedia article have been added to remove dead-end-article status.  I couldn't find an "etager" article in wikipedia, but I left the reference there for now - the article still needs expanding and tidying up, and possibly the external links looked at.  And a photo would be nice. Jodievdw 05:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found out what an etager(e) was and added wikipedia link, and rewrote a few bits of text to make it flow better and be less advertisment-like.  Had a look around but couldn't find any usable references, so there's stuff there that probably needs references cited, but doesn't have them.  Right, I've done my best, someone else can have a go at it now. Jodievdw 11:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bio Raptor

message: As with the Bio-Zoids article, this page does not cite references. Please refer to the talk in Talk:Bio-Zoids for further discussion. Unless accurate sources can be identified in regards of various grading of bio armour, I will be removing it from these articles.Sylvanelite (talk) 10:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: grading of bio armour?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru/Outreach

message: I'm looking forward to change ' name to Peru TaskBox, where only  will be transcluded. (something similar they do at ), all this since IMO a signpost would be less agressive outreach for many (looking also to create a monthly signpost as they do at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Iceland/Outreach) What doyou think? --Andersmusician VOTE 05:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it simplifies maintenance work. Besides  looks pretty good now with its new icons. --Victor12 15:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree also, i had some doubts when i received my first Iceland newsletter, so considering this and the fact that it keeps maintenance (much more) simple, make it so. ErickAgain 22:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi, I've borrowed WP:ICELAND newsletter style, I suppose our next and first one to be sent will be on August 1st 2007, feel free add entries on it until that date then. You might also want to check the Spamlist. (See also the [tree])--Andersmusician VOTE 04:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are we sure we want a newsletter? It seems to me the current taskbox is more than enough to keep up to date on the to-do list of the wikiproject. Besides it looks nice and has the advantage of not cluttering user talk pages. --Victor12 17:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at it as a way to contact old mebers in a not so forceful way rather than using a box. --Andersmusician VOTE 23:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, that's a good idea. At least it will draw their attention back to the project. Now we need to make it look good. --Victor12 01:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newsletter ready
Talk:Tom & Thomas

message: I removed:
The film is very meticulous in its details. Esmé hasn't left anything up to chance. When you watch the movie several times you'll notice how well everything fits; up to certain details for instance, that Thomas' bike is still at his school. It's a joy watching the two boys both played by Aaron Johnson in such a convincing way.
This movie is truly a hidden gem.
-- Beardo (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic text
Talk:Chernichevo, Kardzhali Province

message: In the History part there is one-sided expression which is unsuitable for Wikipedia. Moreover, is it aproppriate to use the word probably when it is unknown; this is not a historiy, it is a medium.
I gave some references in order to satisfy Wikipedia standards. I don't have any idea how to make the article better, since there aren't other known views on the history. Which is the one-sided expression you mentioned? --Georgi stankov (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Joe Bolton (television personality)

message: Pretty sure I'm not imagining this --- I remember, as kid in the NYC area in the 60s, actually getting to go on the "Officer Joe Bolton Show," I remember sitting with a bunch of other kids on a kind of bleacher set-up. I also of course remember trying --- as was my wont, ask any of my teachers -- a one-liner in the middle of one of "Officer" Joe's (he wasn't really a cop, of course...) set-ups for "Skippy the Bush Kangaroo." I got a nasty look from Joe, a kind of "I'll take care of the jokes, smart boy!" stare....so, anyone else remember going on the show?
-bob, NYC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.234.2 (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone else remember going on the TV show as a kid? 

message: Was, St. Nicholas and protector in one 99.44.132.105 (talk) 09:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Officer Joe Bolton as I first ever saw himknew him was
Talk:Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery

message: In law school, I was up for Socratic questioning on this case. I still remember the facts. I think serving successfully as counsel at the Fed Circuit on a case that is in patent law case books (Westlaw) is significant enough to leave the article up. I also agree that this may be notable at least for its Chicago business history connection.
The founding section is weak and should have more citations. I would leave the self-published sources flag up but remove it from the Articles for deletion list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.30.99 (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kaohsiung American School

message: Large sections of this article appear to be cut directly from the schools website.  Please rework it or it may be nominated for deletion.Balloonman (talk) 06:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had three different people email me and one anonymous person post on my talk page asking about this page.  Currently the page is a copy-vio, to fix that somebody can take the same material and simply rewrite it.  You don't necessarily need more information, you just need to rewrite it in your own words.  You also need to assert why KAS is special/notable. I think that argument can be made, but somebody needs to make it.  In its current form, this article is a prime candidate for deletion, but I don't want to nominate it quite yet.  I want to give those of you who care about it a chance.  And to answer the person who asked me, no I'm not going to rewrite it... I have other articles/activities that I'm more interested in pursuing.Balloonman (talk) 07:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Take a look at wp:school it is only a proposed template, but it might give you some ideas.  Also WP:SCH might be able to help you with the article itself.  An international school/HS can be established as notable.Balloonman (talk) 08:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy vio?
Talk:Rose Hill Drive

message: This article, like many artist articles written by fans, is riddled with bias.  It needs to be edited to fit NPOV.  Fopkins | Talk 05:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The band also played the whole second album by Led Zeppelin (Led Zeppelin II) live, e.g. on Dec 31, 2007 at Boulder Theater. --Saemikneu (talk) 22:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  playing Led Zeppelin 
Talk:Nihon Bussan

message: This article is complete nonsense.  Did this come from machine translation or something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namcokid47 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: (signed and sectioned this while I'm on it) For what it's worth, I sort of cleaned the history section on sight. FMecha (to talk|to see log) 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 16:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nihon Bussan →  – WP:COMMONNAME, at least in English-speaking media/gaming circles. FMecha (to talk|to see log) 22:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 January 2021
Template talk:Infobox Wikipedia bot

message: Please feel free to choose a better example - I chose the bot that I just recently created. Perhaps an approved bot would be better. Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is very nice! I have some more examples at User:Polbot, and I'll try to keep them up-to-date with the latest syntax. – Quadell (talk) (random) 00:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example used 

message: This template puts bots that say "yes" to the exclusion complaint field in :Category:Exclusion compliant bots, but it doesn't sort them. Is there any way that this could be put in? Simply using  doesn't work, but perhaps I did it wrong. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk So sue me!  (You'll lose) 03:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusion Compliant category isn't sorting 

message: I propose that we add parameters source_repository and config_repository, which link to a source control browser for the bot's source and configuration.  This will make bot operation more transparent, by giving us a chance to review the code.  It should also improve collaboration. Adamw (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source and configuration repo links
Talk:Colleen McCrory

message: This article is a stub. It can be expanded through looking at McCrory's early life and environmental career in greater depth. Capitalistroadster 06:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:No Money (novel)

message: It's not "Kanou", it's Kanō. I changed this throughout the article. And Ishii to Ishī. The rest looks a bit too fannish. The grammar was also very strange in places, so I patched it up. 90.180.30.210 (talk) 19:29, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have no account no active card no money cannot pay going to street in days 2600:1010:B144:776D:B8B7:401B:D257:407B (talk) 23:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No account no cards
Talk:Function (biology)

message: Perhaps this could be about both form and function? It would widen the scope a little. Since the two are equally important though perhaps we should move it to the name linked above? Richard001 06:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding scope

message: I agree. Function is a very important topic in biology. It perhaps says a lot about the dominance of population genetics in the modern theory of evolution (that all but ignores function) that function has received such a small amount of attention. 
For example: the definition of function in biology is very much an open question. It is not resolved. This article reads like the problem is solved. It doesn't even mention Millikan's etiological concept of function, or Cummins Causal role functions, arguably the two leading theories on biological function definition. 
Again, part of the problem is perhaps that, like life, or biological complexity, function is one of those concepts that is very difficult to pin down, even though we have an innate understanding of it. As such, discussion of biological function is still very much at the stage of philosophy rather than hard science.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.193.5 (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding further sources

message: this page states that it would be difficult to determine the "function" of an enzyme from its structure.  I'd like to see a citation for this.  This statement is, in fact, probably wrong.  The biological community is actually rather good at inferring the function of an enzyme from its structure. Dopeytaylor (talk) 18:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Function and Structure

message: The "reads like an essay" status of this page needs to be addressed (i.e. remedied).Dopeytaylor (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of page
Talk:Armenian genocide recognition

message: Please add Mexico to the map. The Mexican Senate officially recognized the Armenian Genocide a few days ago. Thank you!
Please remove Denmark from the map. Denmark hasn't recognized the Armenian Genocide. Thank you!
: According to the source Denmark recognized the “deportations, massacres and other atrocities” that had been committed against the Armenian population Anatolia in 1915-1923, but they did not recognize the term "genocide".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.23.239.207 (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging , the map's creator. Are you still interested in keeping this updated? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added Mexico. The image description already has a source for Denmark. (t · c) buidhe 07:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the source, Denmark does not recognize the term "genocide". They recognize “deportations, massacres and other atrocities”, but it is not correct that Denmark has recognized the Armenian Genocide. 89.23.239.207 (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenian Genocide recognition map 

message: For the record, I agree with the edits  is making, and I suspect  does too. I think that's sufficient WP:CONSENSUS to override 's objections. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been waiting 5 months for a reply from to you. Care to respond above? Maybe you can provide (in detail) what this "consensus" entails? Archives908 (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got consensus entirely backwards. The content needs consensus to keep it. Not every act of recognition is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia and of those that are, not all are wp:due for this article. It needs to be dramatically cut and rewritten based on scholarship.  (t · c) buidhe 17:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing edits 

message: I've just reverted an IP who  from a description of the genocide (in #Japan: ). As I mentioned in the edit summary, killing 1.5 million people is pretty gruesome, but I'm not sure it does fit the neutral point of view even though most people would probably agree that the Armenian genocide was in fact gruesome. I've self-reverted for now as a result and opened this talk page discussion because I'm not the most knowledgeable on the subject. IMO, it sounds like something that should be said, but in wikivoice. Thoughts? LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 17:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I don't know how this word is adding to reader understanding. And while most people would agree that mass murder is gruesome, there is no need to pick words that may compromise Wikipedia:IMPARTIAL tone. (t · c) buidhe 01:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gruesome?
File talk:Average Joe copy.jpg

message: -- Marital not maritial status.
-- Also it is better if you changed 'median income' to 'income'; we are talking about one individual 'average joe'
:Thanks for pointing out that typo. As for median income, ypu're right it is kind of uneeded as we are talking about the average joe, but I like to keep it anyways just in case - some people might find that description helpful. Thanks for your suggestions! Regards, Signaturebrendel 07:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Husnabad

message: I'm a business man.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradippk (talk • contribs) 06:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pradip Kumar Mahata 
Talk:2006 Australian Saloon Car Championship

message: Refer to the V8Supercar pages for the set-up of a championship season --Falcadore 07:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the page need a bit of help, i can improve the dead end and other small problems. CallMeAndrew (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)