Talk:Bad Girls (TV series)

message: Why has it been removed from the page?
: In looking at the history, it seems that it was removed because someone vandalized the page, specifically that section.  Who knows if it's necessary for cancellation to be its own section, given that the show's cancellation is mentioned in the introduction. Jtattenbaum 17:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancellation?

message: I have heard a review on Radio 4 for "Bad Girls: The Musical" running in the West End and based on the TV series.
Shouldn't that get a mention in the article somewhere? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.225.147.82 (talk • contribs).
:Perhaps, unfortunately I jnow nothing about this interview --Oliver Davison 19:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: I got rid of most of the series 8 summary. If people want an episode by episode sumamary, they can go to the Bad Girls official website! I also added a section about the cancellation. I would also consider getting rid of, or at least massively rewriting, the recurring elements section... it's really badly written and probably not even necessary. --Pellet 23:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is in need of lots of work.. presently I'm re-watching episodes as its been so long since I last saw them and doing the LOE, hopefully we can get this page up to a good standard. Matthew Fenton (talk) 23:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think the Series plot summaries are far too waffly and verbose. We really don't need to know every plotline in the series here. The series 8 summary in particular has once again become a slab of useless fan-babble --Pellet 11:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Who wants to edit it?  It should be the same length as the other plot summaries.  No reason that the shortest (and worst) series should have the longest write-up! Jtattenbaum 22:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited all of the Series summaries into what should be a more readable style and a better base to work from. The ones that were up there were practically unreadable and yes, S8 was far too long compared to the others. Let me know what you think. Unlikelyheroine 23:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited S8 again, which had been expanded with dozens of spelling errors by yet another unregistered user who appears to be a fan of this series and wants to relate everything that happens. It's now longer than it was - I don't think it needs to have more than this. Unlikelyheroine 17:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article was way too long 

message: I personally think it is pointless having the cast broken up into past and final series, as the series is now defunct. If you're going to do that for the final series, why not every series. What do others think? Jay Firestorm 19:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast list 

message: Does anyone know why ITV3 have seemingly skipped the final episode of series 2? 
I've turned in tonight to find that it is the first episode of series three. I've scoured the schedules and am certain that I haven't missed one - I definately watched it last Monday. Now one of the key episodes plot-development wise has been jumped, making this week's a bit hard to follow. 
I wonder what's going on. Copyright complications? Legal problems due to plotline? ITV3 just being stupid (wouldn't be the first time!)?? Who knows. Jay Firestorm 23:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Replying to myself, I e-mailed ITV3 about this, and got this reply:
"In response to your previous email.
 
I can confirm episode 13 of series to will now be transmitted on Monday 26/2/07. Thank you for bringing the error to our attention.
 
Regards
DUTY OFFICER - PR"
So, rather worrying that a leading channel don't seem to know what they're doing or don't spot mistakes, but positive in that the episode will be broadcast. =) Jay Firestorm 20:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ITV3 skipped episode (?)

message: "Also for the first time, series one to three has been released in their original widescreen format, and they contain subtitles, as does series four, which were previously not included."
The complete series one ( Acorn Media 2011)have no subtitle and the aspect ratio is 4:3 (like Contender's DVD) not widescreen format.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.239.167.252 (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD series 1 released in 2001 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bad Girls (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111175121/http://www.badgirls.co.uk/ to http://www.badgirls.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified