Talk:Indoor tanning lotion

message: I dont know about the facts of this article, but it seems to be written very subjectively. My salespitch sense is tingling.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.54.202.102 (talk) 13:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjectivity 

message: In the first sentence somebody wrote "like tanning oil, indoor tanning lotion is..." The problem is that indoor tanning lotion IS tanning oil in some circumstances, so it seems unnecessary to state it. Yes? No? --Coching (talk) 09:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needlessness of comment? 

message: Wouldn't make sense to merge with Sunless tanning since they are two completely different things.  Indoor tanning lotion is designed to be used with an ultraviolet device (sun, tanning bed/booth/other device), sunless tanning products are designed specifically to avoid all ultraviolet, from either devices or the natural sun.  People who use one, do not use the other.  (ie: either they avoid all UV, or they embrace it)  They are as different as a fish and a bicycle.  Dennis Brown (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sunless is not the same as UV-free, and both this article and Sunless tanning discuss lotions for use with UV and lotions for use without UV, making this article redundant. Also, how can an indoor tanning lotion be designed for use with the sun? -- 202.124.72.74 (talk) 02:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no sources that talk about this subject. It should either be merged or deleted. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Against merge or delete

message: An image used in this article, File:Indoortanninglotion.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Indoortanninglotion.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Indoor tanning lotion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150402194621/http://www.lookingfit.com/articles/1998/07/without-tanning-ultraviolet-radiation.aspx to http://www.lookingfit.com/articles/1998/07/without-tanning-ultraviolet-radiation.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150302041459/http://www.atbeauty.net:80/best-indoor-tanning-lotions to http://www.atbeauty.net/best-indoor-tanning-lotions/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Indoor tanning lotion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111018113819/http://www.lookingfit.com:80/articles/2000/03/a-maturing-industry.aspx to http://www.lookingfit.com/articles/2000/03/a-maturing-industry.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Tanning lotion redirects here, but clearly indoor tanning lotion is a subset of tanning lotion, and quite probably a derivative of the original outdoor tanning lotion (which does not appear to have an article). This doesn't make sense. It would be like if the Sun tanning article were just a redirect to Indoor tanning. --Jtle515 (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Jtle515, you got a valid point. -AlHamdi786 (talk) 07:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does only indoor tanning lotion get an article?