Talk:Bilawal Bhutto Zardari

message: Please I want to put in your kind notice that Bilawal Zardari is his real name. He is not belong to Bhuto. His mother only was Bhuto but his father is Asif Ali Zardari. He is just taking political favor to use another family name.
So please update his real name Bilawal Zardari  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mazharaziz786 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Bilawal kutti is a notable person, he is the elder son of Benzair Bhutto, and a heir to Randi political dynasty, his name is frequently mentioned in the Pakistani media   as a future player in Pakistani politics.--JamesDS (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has he done anything outside of being Ms. Bhutto's son to make him independently notable? Keilana 01:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bilawal kutti Zardari kutta is the political head of Pakistan harami party. Pakistan harami Party is second biggest political party in Pakistan. This Party has won three federal elections in Pakistan. Currently Bilawal kutti Zardari kutta is the chairmain of this party who has a vote bank of around 500 million people.Rawfey (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

text: It's at the least an assertion of some sort of notability. I suggest we let this play for a week or so and so if anyone can build up the article.DGG (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The media are calling him a possible contender in the upcoming Pakistamni elections, and he's expected to take "center stage". --JamesDS (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact is that he isn't notable for being related to a famous person, but for being related to 3+ famous people.  I'd say give it a few days for now, but if anyone takes it to AfD we would get a more definitive answer. Joshdboz (talk) 12:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: It looks like he might just become a bit more notable tomorrow  Joshdboz (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Strong Keep Time magazine is reporting that Bilawal Zardari "will likely be named as her political heir and the new party leader on Sunday." Joshdboz (talk) 21:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Strong Keep See Above 66.82.9.74 (talk) 08:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: As the editors above have indicated, I think we should at least wait and see what comes out of the statement due later today before further action on redirection. WWGB (talk) 09:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should not. If the statement that comes out later indicates that he has indeed been tapped for the leadership of the PPP, no harm done; the content is still in the history and is trivial to restore. For now the subject is not notable and should be redirected. And you ought to apologize to me for the "rvv" edit summary. --Trovatore (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do regret the rvv, and acknowledge that your edit was good faith. WWGB (talk) 09:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Trovatore (talk) 09:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bilawal Zardari" gest 6480 hits on Google search and 70 on Google news including widespread reporting that he will play some major role in PPP politics.  I think that, mixed with his very famous family, is notability enough for now.  But if after today you still think this should be a redirect, feel free to bring to AfD to gather more opinions. Joshdboz (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Just appointed chairman PPP.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshdboz (talk • contribs) 13:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that makes him "notable". WWGB (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: One could say so. Joshdboz (talk) 13:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. Off topic though, it's pathetic. You don't turn over the hope for secular democracy in the world's sixth largest country to a teenager; I don't care who his mommy is, or even how damn smart he might be (which I have no idea). I hope the PPP reconsiders. --Trovatore (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I boldly redirected the article to Bhutto family; User:WWGB reverted; that's fine, it's the bold-revert-discuss pattern. Here I am to discuss. However I was fairly offended by the edit summary "rvv" -- I didn't vandalize anything; I redirected the name where it should go, because the subject is not notable. He may be notable in the future, even the near future, but that's irrelevant.
Right now his only notability is that he's in a famous family and there's speculation that he'll be called upon to take the reins of the Pakistan People's Party. Speculation isn't good enough, and WP is not a newspaper. Right now this title should be redirected to Bhutto family, and perhaps a few words said there about the subject would be OK. --Trovatore (talk) 09:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the editors above have indicated, I think we should at least wait and see what comes out of the statement due later today before further action on redirection. WWGB (talk) 09:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should not. If the statement that comes out later indicates that he has indeed been tapped for the leadership of the PPP, no harm done; the content is still in the history and is trivial to restore. For now the subject is not notable and should be redirected. And you ought to apologize to me for the "rvv" edit summary. --Trovatore (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do regret the rvv, and acknowledge that your edit was good faith. WWGB (talk) 09:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Trovatore (talk) 09:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bilawal Zardari" gest 6480 hits on Google search and 70 on Google news including widespread reporting that he will play some major role in PPP politics.  I think that, mixed with his very famous family, is notability enough for now.  But if after today you still think this should be a redirect, feel free to bring to AfD to gather more opinions. Joshdboz (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Just appointed chairman PPP.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshdboz (talk • contribs) 13:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that makes him "notable". WWGB (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: One could say so. Joshdboz (talk) 13:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. Off topic though, it's pathetic. You don't turn over the hope for secular democracy in the world's sixth largest country to a teenager; I don't care who his mommy is, or even how damn smart he might be (which I have no idea). I hope the PPP reconsiders. --Trovatore (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  not notable; redirect 

message: Shouldn't it be Bilawal Zardari instead of Bilawal Bhutto? Lordricha (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He can not be called 'Bilawal Zardari' because with an agreed consensus he has changed his family name by adding the family name of his mother Benazir Bhutto . According to Islam a person will be called by the name of Mother in the time of resurrection. So what is harm if he adds his mother's family name too? Rawfey (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

text: He is known as Bilawal Zardari . The title of the article has been changed to reflect that. WWGB (talk) 12:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I think the title should be Bilawal Bhutto Zardari.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garg (talk • contribs) 00:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just been watching the PPP news conference on TV, and it's been announced that henceforth he'll be known as Bilawal Bhutto, but hang on for proper confirmation before moving the article. -- Arwel (talk) 14:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Asif Zardari said that his full name will now be Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. 59.93.12.201 (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: That's ok by me, but you moved the page cut and paste, which messes up the GFDL, you should move the page not cut and paste it.--Alf melmac 15:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, the pages involved are now moved so as to keep their respective histories, excepting the edit Tanzanite made to this page before moving the old named talk page over here, sorry about that Tanzanite. I have also seen to all the redirects and double redirects. For further information on moving pages so as to abide by the GFDL please see Help:Moving a page.--Alf melmac 16:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhutto or Zardari? 

message: CNN is reporting that Bilawal will not be chair officially until he graduates, until then an interim chair will be in place... 70.55.88.113 (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chairman 

message: Does anybody know what subject he studies at Oxford? According to THE TIMES it's history, whereas german media claims that he studies law. --80.141.80.41 (talk) 20:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen history several times but I don't have a source right now. Joshdboz (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Meanwhile the BBC on Radio4 were just describing him as 'Oxford Graduate' - surely, the BBC cannot ever be incorrect?! But so far as I am aware he has not yet completed his degree course. --Ndaisley (talk) 06:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Course read 

message: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7165052.stm this image seems nice but is under copyright, anyone got a FREE picture? --Kanonkas, Take Contact (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This image is likely to be deleted under Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Unacceptable_images. I know how annoying this is as I've had experience with uploading images in the past. It sounds very difficult and annoying but the only way we can get an acceptable image of Bilawal Bhutto is if someone takes a picture of him and uploads it on Wikipedia. The other alternative is to search Flickr.com for an image of him that allows for a Creative Commons 2.0 licence. I've already checked and there aren't any such images right now. Thus, we may have to wait until either an image with a CC-licence is released, or if someone uploads an image they've taken themselves. Ekantik talk 23:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there is another option too! if someone could ask Bilawal Bhutto Zardari himself on facebook to give his picture for using in this article. --SMS  Talk 13:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free image 

message: Editor can use this TIME.com article to data-mine information about Bilawal's reaction to Benazir's assassination on his FaceBook page. Ekantik talk 23:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article states "There is no evidence that Bilawal drunk alcohol" so what's your point? WWGB (talk) 23:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Facebook reaction

message: <Oxford pedantry> The BBC incorrectly titles Christ Church as "Christ Church college" and someone followed their suit, linking the three words to the article about the place. This is incorrect, it is either to be called "Christ Church" or "The House" - in The Oxford University Calendar (published by Oxford University Press - with editorial control at the University Offices in Wellington Square) gives it's title as "Christ Church" and states
"THIS foundation, traditionally known as 'The House',...". Likewise one does not call his mother's alma mater, Lady Margaret Hall, "Lady Margaret Hall College". </Oxford pedantry>--Alf melmac 07:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Christ Church is a constituent college of University of Oxford. Since this article is FOR GENERAL AUDIENCES AND NOT JUST OXBRDIGE ALUMNI, it should state that Oxford is a university, and that Christ Church is a college from Oxford University. 70.55.86.232 (talk) 05:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Those facts are now reflected there, though Oxford isn't a university, it's a city and local government district. We should use correct titling, this isn't the Simple English Wikipedia, we should bother to write to be both readable by the general public and be correct.--Alf melmac 10:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Christ Church

message: How do we know that he is a Shia Muslim. Can someone verify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.93.92 (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The info box heading states Religion. Bilawal's religion is Islam; Shi'a is a denomination, not a religion. Please indicate why it is important to make such a distinction beyond stating Islam. WWGB (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

text: My mother and father are both dead. That does not make me dead. WWGB (talk) 11:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please consult Biographies of living people about adding religion. It is against WP policy to add information just because you think it's the truth. (Drumz0rz (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Impeccable logic; Bilawal's father is a self-professed Shi'a and his mother herself is a Shi'a. Rather you need to provide sources how he is not a Shi'a or whether he even changed his sect. Since no such source exists to clarify, I would prefer to abide by what Pakistani television tells me. Mar4d (talk) 12:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of the funniest things I have read on Wikipedia ("you need to provide sources how he is not ... "). Since when did the onus of proof turn to proving something is false? Please see WP:SOURCES: "Sources should directly support the material as it is presented in an article". WWGB (talk) 12:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly; what sources or information do you have for that matter where he is anything but Shi'a? I for one find it funny that his whole family being Shi'a, there is a doubt being cast on what denomination he himself belongs to. Please clarify on what lines you are thinking here Mar4d (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:BLPCAT, categories regarding religious beliefs should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question; and the subject's beliefs are relevant to his notable activities or public life, according to reliable published sources. Since there appear to be no reliable published sources, then what I am thinking here is that Wikipedia remains silent on Bilawal's Muslim denomination. WWGB (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shia Islam 

message: An editor keeps inserting that Bilawal is a Shi'ite, accompanied by a "reference" . I have personally checked this source and it says NOTHING about Bilawal. I have therefore removed the claim as it is unsubstantiated. WWGB (talk) 22:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please consult Biographies of living people about adding religion. It is against WP policy to add information just because you think it's the truth. (Drumz0rz (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Impeccable logic; Bilawal's father is a self-professed Shi'a and his mother herself is a Shi'a. Rather you need to provide sources how he is not a Shi'a or whether he even changed his sect. Since no such source exists to clarify, I would prefer to abide by what Pakistani television tells me. Mar4d (talk) 12:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of the funniest things I have read on Wikipedia ("you need to provide sources how he is not ... "). Since when did the onus of proof turn to proving something is false? Please see WP:SOURCES: "Sources should directly support the material as it is presented in an article". WWGB (talk) 12:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly; what sources or information do you have for that matter where he is anything but Shi'a? I for one find it funny that his whole family being Shi'a, there is a doubt being cast on what denomination he himself belongs to. Please clarify on what lines you are thinking here Mar4d (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:BLPCAT, categories regarding religious beliefs should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question; and the subject's beliefs are relevant to his notable activities or public life, according to reliable published sources. Since there appear to be no reliable published sources, then what I am thinking here is that Wikipedia remains silent on Bilawal's Muslim denomination. WWGB (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: The Wikipedia article lists the Bilawal Bhutto website at www.bilawalbhutto.pk/. I have some reservations about the authenticity of this website, especially as the home page is a direct lift from an earlier version of the Wikipedia article. Thoughts? WWGB (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It does not look professional.  Also, I believe the inclusion of a Google adverstisement is a major sign of its unauthenticity.  Funds would come directly from the PPP (maybe) and definitely not from ads.  Also, in a recent press conference, he said that he wants the media to respect his privacy.  The creation of a website by Bilawal seems very unlikely.  I think it should be removed.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 00:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  The only reference to it that I could find is a Jane's article which credits it for an image.  I think we should wait to see if this is ever confirmed as official (or if he buys the domain ; ). Joshdboz (talk) 01:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicious website? 

message: Okay, an anonymous user has been pretty adamant that this article should be included. After having been deleted from the article a number of times by myself and others, User:WWGB has made an attempt to "include it without sensationalism". I still personally think that this has no place in this article, especially its constant wording that it is written by one Glen Owen, which frankly doesn't seem important at all. I also have problems with the article itself: its main source seems to be Facebook, and it's speculative of attitudes towards his student life. --AdamSommerton (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have absolutely no problem if the Daily Mail material was removed. I was just trying to bring some respite to the reverts involving Adam and the anon editor. If other interested editors express opinions here, it may resolve the issue one way or another. WWGB (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Remove - the article is excessively trivial tabloid material with no allegations that would disgrace any 19-year old in Britain. It's not so much damaging as silly, and not notable - a good deal less so, for instance, than Kevin Rudd's strip club visit, which has been taken out of his article though he is a sitting Prime Minister (well actually now I've checked, it is now back in, but it was excised during the Oz election)Jaguarjaguar (talk) 01:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that the piece is by Glen "Anything that suggests that extremism is taking hold. It doesn't matter what form it takes, just as long as it gives any indication of extremism" Owen, who has already outraged various members of the student body (amongst others) I don't think it even deserves a mention. There is not one ounce of proof he provides that Bilawal acutally knows that said girls are 'self-considered lesbians', regardless that some accounts on Facebook, which may or not actually relate to real human beings, say that they are. I applaud the re-write though, it adequately makes it clear that of the words that were said, his assumed intake of alcohol with respect to the accepted religious caveats is questionable at the very least and in all likelyhood a total load of bunk. If it is kept in, leave Mr Glen Owen's name in - the top google link that appeared for me is the one I quoted which adequately shows his methodology in creating such 'journalism'.163.1.147.29 (talk) 08:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention the man's hypocrisy in trying to elicit Muslim extremist views, but coming across as a member of the Taleban himself in his judgement of Bilawal...I think the whole thing should be removed without further ado and will do it myself in a bit if no objections come up Jaguarjaguar (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Mail article 

message: whats his dan rank.68.160.241.122 (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  black belt 

message: This article has substantial bias in favor of Bilawal. It omits major information about his scandals. There is no mention of his mishandling of the August 2010 flood crisis and how he and his dad tried to start his political career in Britain with a maiden political speech. There is no mention of his smoking scandal. No mention of his sex scandal. His name is improperly stated as Bilawal Zardari Bhutto while his common name is Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. LIke SERIOUSLY, Wikipedia's integrity is at stake here. This page might as well be his political campaign page! Phantomenace (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A strong opinion from someone who apparently joined Wikipedia 31 minutes earlier!  WWGB (talk) 02:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, I am Phantomenace. My user page explains why I have a new account - User:Phantomenace2 I would like you to explain why you have been deleting sourced information such as about his first term. Phantomenace2 (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, you are not Phantomenace, you are Phantomenace2. Now you are even confusing yourself! WWGB (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Are you ridiculous. I am Phantomenace and Phantomenace 2. It explaines it in my user page.Phantomenace2 (talk) 15:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: see Good ARticle for Zardari page. Its mentioned in the lead for the Zardari history of jail time. Phantomenace2 (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Zardari and residence hall

message: According to the Guardian article linked in the biography, his correct name is "Bilawal Bhutto Zardari" and not "Bilawal Zardari Bhutto" – . Please comment. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 20:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. His name is usually written as Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. His short name is Bilawal, not Bhutto or Zardari. WWGB (talk) 00:54, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page to its appropriate name.  We do not use first names on Wikipedia because that is not encyclopedic in style.  Please review WP:MOSBIO (WP:SURNAME). The reason why the media refers to him as "Bilawal" on numerous occasions is because he is often mentioned alongside his family members in those publications. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 14:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name 

message: Bilawal Bhutto Zardari does not have any nick name. Billo Rani or Baji are not his official nicknames. Billo Rani is actually an Indian song which has nothing to do with Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. These names are given by his political opponents to defame his character. We believe that according to the rules of wikipedia, it can not allow such editions which does character assasination of a political leader whose party Pakistan Peoples Party made three governments in Pakistan with the support of millions of people of Pakistan. We request the administrator to either remove these names or provide proofs Rawfey (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicknames have been removed. --NeilN talk to me 17:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

text: And this has been removed - standard political gamesmanship. --NeilN talk to me 17:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nick Name Bias

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "dawn.com":
From Pakistani general election, 2013: 
From Pakistan Peoples Party: http://www.dawn.com/news/1136635
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Bilawal Bhutto Zardari]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.pakmission-uk.gov.pk/News/NewsItem470.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1298715,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080102011903/http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jyLlVu7eOZvgLqAyvCg1uo4rkSaw to http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jyLlVu7eOZvgLqAyvCg1uo4rkSaw
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120529123209/http://www.geo.tv:80/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=50847 to http://www.geo.tv/GeoDetail.aspx?ID=50847
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 185.233.18.84 (talk) 19:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. lomrjyo(talk•contrib) 16:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  they wish to have the #Controversies section below added. Since the request is almost certainly from  who is topic banned from BLPs (and indefinitely blocked for ignoring that ban) the answer to the request is "not done". FDW777 (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Actually I see this request languished for days. Sockpuppet or not, it's still a request to restore Popsmokes38's version of the article despite the repeated objections made to it on BLP grounds. So still . FDW777 (talk) 17:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2021 

message: I have found a little issue on the name. Please correct
Bilawal Zardari is the correct name in Pakistan. We use Our Fathers cast Not mothers.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari 202.47.36.245 (talk) 07:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2022 

message: I'd like to make an edit to the early life paragraph. Kingf888 (talk) 04:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.--*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page  04:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2022 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: 125.209.88.58 (talk) 05:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2022 

message: In this article, the first line states "Bilawal Bhutto Zardari (born 21 September 1988) is a Pakistani politician & murderer[1]". This is false that he is a murderer. The source inserted nowhere states that he committed the murder and there is no valid source stating that he is a murderer. So, please remove the murderer statement from his wikipedia page. Truthful mechanism (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Peaceray (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2022 

message: There should be a "Controversies" section for this Wikipedia article. 
1. Nepotism:  Bilawal's grandfather, mother, and father have all served in positions of power in Pakistan, including in the roles of Prime Minister and President of Pakistan. Bilawal is currently the chairman of Pakistan People's Party. The party chairperson role has been held by a member of the Bhutto family for most of the party's history since its inception in the 1970s. This has led to criticism for the role that nepotism and dynastic politics is playing in Pakistan's power structures. Sources:  https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/14/bilawal-defends-pakistani-dynastic-politics-during-cnn-interview/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asif_Ali_Zardari, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zulfikar_Ali_Bhutto, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_People%27s_Party 
2. Election Transparency:  Bilawal does not support electronic voting machines (EVM) and the government under which he currently serves as a Foreign Minister has passed a bill to stop the use of EVMs in polls. Pakistan suffers from election rigging and attempts to introduce EVMs to bring greater transparency to the electoral process have been halted. 
Sources:  https://www.thedailystar.net/news/asia/south-asia/news/pak-parliament-bill-passed-stop-use-evm-polls-3033476, https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/603482-how-elections-are-rigged
3. Brutal repression:  Bilawal continues to be part of a coalition government that has brutally repressed people's right to freedom of speech and protest and has been involved in raiding homes without a warrant and custodial torture of political opponents. 
Sources:  https://www.voanews.com/a/pakistani-politician-alleges-torture-in-police-custody-/6714854.html, https://www.globalvillagespace.com/sindh-police-under-fire-for-raiding-haleem-adil-sheikhs-house-without-warrants/, https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-police-fire-teargas-baton-charge-supporters-ousted-pm-khan-2022-05-25/ Skullsplitter0816 (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. In this case, this would be both a substantial and likely controversial addition. Please ensure that you establish consensus before making or requesting such an edit. If no objections are raised within a reasonable timeframe, feel free to re-open this request and ping me. Meanwhile, I would suggest you rewrite part 3 to be in compliance with WP:NPOV; use of illustrative words such as "brutally" in this context is discouraged. You can of course state that this is how the relevant sources report on the matter. Actualcpscm (talk) 15:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2023 

message: Request to add new heading " General Elections 2024 "; and to include the text under the heading that: In preparation for the General Elections of 2024, Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari declared a significant shift in the party's strategy by announcing the decision to part ways with its allies, citing a lack of commitment to addressing crucial issues such as inflation and terrorism. Speaking at the commemoration of the 16th death anniversary of Benazir Bhutto, Bilawal outlined a 10-point agenda for the party's stance, including promises to double salaries within five years, provide free solar energy for the poor, ensure education for all, and offer free health services across Pakistan.
With the source: https://headline.pk/bilawal-fuels-election-campaign-with-10-point-manifesto/ Izaanz (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Too spammy sounding, please read WP:PEACOCK Seawolf35 T--C 05:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2023