Talk:Indian Union Muslim League

message: *Comment. This has been listed on WP:RM since 15 September. Does anyone have an opinion? –Hajor 01:38, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to Indian Union Muslim League

message: Page moved. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 01:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discision

message: To hide the hand of IUML in communal violence a guy named Salih is deleting references and text from the wikipedia. His act of unwarranted censorship be noted by wiki admins and suitable action taken.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Salih  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.193.161 (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear IP, it's true that few IUML local leaders are allegedly involved in the Marad incident. This can be mentioned in the article Marad massacre, if it's not already included. But, mentioning such things in the article about the political party is undue. I request you to be civil while discussing with fellow wikipedians. Thanks Salih (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

text: I believe you and striking out the word allegedly. But still it is not appropriate to include this section as per my previous comment. Salih (talk) 07:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Accusing me of communal attitude... what can I say, only laugh:) Salih (talk) 07:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism by User Salih 

message: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2006-09-28/thiruvananthapuram/27830289_1_iuml-cbi-inquiry-ig-mahesh-kumar-singla
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/62-get-life-term-for-marad-killings/411268/ 62 get life term for Marad killings
http://www.hindu.com/2003/05/31/stories/2003053100621000.htm
http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Kerala_tables_Marad_massacre_report-nid-33289-cid-TNI.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.193.161 (talk) 05:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof of IUML's involvement in communal riots

message: Added reference from outside, adding mg radhakrishnan and India today reticle on position of different communities and parties, would like to remove the one source tag and original research as iuml reference is spread across different media, But feels that more reference can be added, like interviews of mr.Thangal or other office bearers. (Alex.mathews (talk) 13:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding more neutral references 

message: While the artcle is voluminous, citations are numbered. Not only does this render the authenticity of the article very poor, it has literally made Wikipedia a Propoganda mouthpiece. I request the admins and editors to revamp this article and make it more neutral.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.172.135 (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations but a lot of information. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Union Muslim League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721162429/http://www.indianunionmuslimleague.in/ to http://www.indianunionmuslimleague.in/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is clear bias and the section looks like manifesto of Indian Union Muslim League. Ideology section shouldn't include laudatory quotes from online magazines Factpineapple (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme and clear bias in Ideology section