lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joint Base Anacostia–Bolling

message: For all of those interested, I am new to Wikipedia (In the sense of editing), but I now that the Bolling AFB page is severely out of date because of the recent changes enacted from Base Realignment and Closure 2005.  It is now Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, and the primary controlling organization is the United States Department of the Navy.  
I am going to begin tackling this article for updating to relect the current status of Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling.  Any help is greatly welcomed.
Leviathan1137 (talk) 21:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update of Bolling AFB Page to reflect changes from BRAC 2005

message: Hello, i am new to wikipedia, but i would like to point somthing out here about this article... Bolling AFB is located entirely in southwest washington dc. i am going to edit the article to reflect this error. If you look at a map of the District, the base is west of south capitol street, which is one of the quadrant dividers in the district, therefore the base is located in southwest. have a nice day!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.25.97 (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's historically been considered southeast. Will change with reference. Student7 (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Southeast/Southwest Washington DC

message: Right now we have separate articles for Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, Bolling Field, and Naval Support Facility Anacostia.  The latter two are historical entities that were merged into the Joint Base, so it seems like it's redundant to have three articles, especially given their short lengths.  Is there a reason not to merge the three articles into a single article? Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is continuity between the bases (I think there is), and the articles are relatively short, they probably should be merged under "history" in the Joint Base article. Student7 (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling is currently a verbatim copy of the first few paragraphs of Bolling Field, so I'll have the latter article moved over the former one. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 06:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles?
Talk:Charon (browser)

message: Help me here, kids - I'm no engineer, so I can't say anything authoritative about Charon...but I like it, it is useful as a browser under Microsoft and *Nix platforms simply because of its obscurity...surely a little reference to its simplicity, standards observance and resulting security are in order here.
Proposing to redirect this page to Charon (web browser) for naming consistency with other "Blah (web browser)" articles. -- Csant 07:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable. --Lost Goblin 10:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Support. Benn Newman 13:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ballistic Missile Defense Organization

message: "That same year, the Secretary of the Army announced that all ballistic missile defense efforts would be realigned under one organization and, on 20 May 1974, the SAFEGUARD System Organization was redesignated the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO)."*
      
*  Chapter III, p. 86
Bob K31416 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BMDO began in 1974 
Talk:Employee of the Month (2004 film)

message: Everything mentioned in the wiki article is great, but they forget the part that makes this movie horrible. They also have a random horrible horrible horrible ending added. Its (spoiler) a setup, and it turns out he just wanted to become rich. And then they all kill each other, making you hate the character. Ahhhh! I hate the ending, how dare they add this baloney and destroy a movie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.249.55 (talk) 07:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Please add this category because Sara and Wendy are lesbian couple. Moreover the film says that dentist Eric is gay. Add it to "Plot". 2A00:1370:8111:BE06:13C3:857A:43D:799C (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category LGBT
Talk:Fort Shafter

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions

message: The "Notes" section absolutely reeks of copyvio. I am at work, and have to get back to what I'm getting paid for, but I think it would be good if someone could research it.
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 16:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 
Talk:Fade to Black (2004 film)

message: I've removed entries from the cast list that are not confirmed by reliable sources. Actually, what I've done is comment them out so the info isn't lost, with some guidance. If other citations are added, then entries can be restored. I've removed the set-list completely because it appears to have come directly from a different wiki site (and added that as an external link),  I've done this because: a) User contributed content on other sites is not considered a reliable source; and b) Wiki sites are, by nature, dynamic content, so an external link is more appropriate. Nzd (talk) 13:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unreferenced content
Talk:Black money scam

message: None of these terms are defined with (supposed) meanings. Can we get an expert in on this? 85.159.97.4 (talk) 10:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 
Talk:The New Terrance and Phillip Movie Trailer

message: It says the theme to the Fightin' Round the World is the Lumberjack Song but it sounds nothing like it. Deletion? Or does anyone else think they sound similar?
:It's vaguely similar in structure, and chord progression, but only because both songs are fairly generic musically and are creative through their lyrics.  I don't think it's verifiable or noteworthy, even though Matt and Trey are known Monty Python fans.  I'm all for deleting it. Professor Chaos 03:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Russell Crowe is not from Australia where wallabies come from he is from New Zealand. A Correction is needed here. Amzon 04:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wally B.
Talk:Forza (disambiguation)

message: One entry on the Forza page says it is an Italian word for power. I have two questions:
#Should the reference be to Wikipedia rather than a disambiguation page on power?
#Does the Italian word apply to all or most meanings of the English word "power", or only one or two meanings. If so, perhaps the links shoud be to the appropriate article. Gerry Ashton 04:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the link to point to Wikitionary instead of Wikipedia. Gerry Ashton 14:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fulton surface-to-air recovery system

message: Someone noticed back in 2006 that large blocks are verbatim copies from the cia.gov source. I'll have some time in a few days to help, but if anyone has time sooner, please feel free. Cheers, Older and ... well older (talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost a decade later... 

message: Per WP:MILPOP, you need a number of references that prove that this game's usage of this tech is notable. Elisfkc (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker 

message: I think the picture in the "development" section is the most illustrative picture. The article would be much more interesting with that picture at the top of the page. The current header photos are misleading, because they don't tell you anything about picking up people! I assumed the article was about catching the film from spy satellites because of the lede photos!
The problem is I can't figure out a way to do that without majorly changing the look, does anybody have any suggestions? Ninjalectual (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture in "Development" should be the lede 

message: John Masters, in his second autobiographical book, The Road Past Mandalay, describes the pickup system that they, as chindits, relied on to return gliders and evacuate wounded. It could be a source for filling in some of the earlier history. There is not too much more to say, except that it was an essential component of the plan to operate behind Japanese lines. From what he said, it worked well until they were ordered to hold a fixed position, which allowed time for the Japanese forces to position large anti-aircraft guns, which made the aerial supply system untenable. --AJim (talk) 00:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII use 

message: What's the difference between the Fulton system, STARS and Skyhook? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: When he invented and patented this pick-up system Mr. Robert Fulton gave it the catchy name "Skyhook." The US military tends to use a nomenclature (name) that also describes what the described object does, hence: "Surface-to-Air-Recovery system", or STARS. So, the STARS was usually called the "Fulton" by the guys in the operating squadrons, "Skyhook" for the public, and Surface-to-Air Recovery System in our official technical manuals. I was trained to operate the Skyhook system 1980-86 173.79.128.49 (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Skyhook
Talk:Four Shades of Brown

message: According to most sources (including the IMDB), the film is just over three hours. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.252.175.189 (talk) 21:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four one-hour parts? 

message: I moved this back to the official English title, as stated at the Swedish Film Institute's website: . Keeping the original title is only for films that don't have an official English title, and in this case it's extra unfortunate since the title is a reference to an English language song title - track four on James Brown's 1969 Say It Loud - I'm Black and I'm Proud. Smetanahue (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Going the Distance (2004 film)

message: The original release title of this film was Going the Distance. The longer title, National Lampoon's Going the Distance was only added for the later American release. As Wiki policy says to use the title of original release I have moved the article to Going the Distance. If further proof of the film's original title is needed, note the film poster used to illustrate the article, plus the number of articles linking to the original title far outnumbered the much rarer US release version. 23skidoo (talk) 23:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed tltle
Talk:Hijacking Catastrophe

message: I came here looking for a discussion of the POV tag on the article and found none.  Therefore, I'm removing the tag from the article.  If you feel that the tag does, indeed, belong... then make your arguments for it here on the talk page as stated in the wikipedia guidelines. I don't see a POV problem within the article, if you do... please explain why and where on this talk page so we can work on it within a reasonable agreement.  Just slapping a POV tag on an article without discussion is unacceptable. Cowicide 21:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agreed with its initial inclusion, I have significantly tweaked it and I believe it no longer is applicable. That's isn't to say it can't be improved. - RoyBoy 800 16:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:In Search of Santa

message: Should the 90s animated one that never came out be mentioned? 98.14.15.12 (talk) 02:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The original one.. 
Talk:Fletch (film)

message: Until this stuff can be moved to another section I'm going to archive it here. --J.D. 13:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section

message: I think that it is worth mentioning the 2022 Fletch movie, "Confess, Fletch" due to come out soon.  I just don't know the best way to do it, with regards to Wikipedia style guidelines.  Is it best to just add "In 2022, a new movie based on McDonald's book Confess, Fletch, and with the same title, was released.", including a link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confess%2C_Fletch ?  Or should a disambiguation page/section be created, for these movies and the books?
I leave it to someone else to make the best decision and hopefully update the actual page. 24.56.77.201 (talk) 07:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 Fletch movie, "Confess, Fletch"
Talk:SOPHIA (vehicle)

message: The owner of the small animated SOPHIA images is Marc Radon - http://www.radon-arts.com/
--
Does he really have copyright on something that someone else made and he just ripped...? (I'm assuming he wasn't the one designing SOPHIA in the games, but even if he was, the company would own those sprites.) 
Swiiman (talk) 05:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright on animated SOPHIA images
Talk:A Kiss on the Nose

message: The list of awards that the film won is unnecessary. Instead, you should create a section for "Reception" and include a brief description of the most important accolades. If you have any questions about how to go about this, feel free to visit my talk page and send me a message.--nblschool (talk) 22:56, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A brief Note from Wikiproject Films Assessor(2009)
Talk:Koma (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: I was expecting to find info on KOMA the Oklahoma City radio station, and the search function only finds this page as a result. Is there a page for the radio station? If so, shouldn't this page have a disambiguation? If not, how can the KOMA radio station be found?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.95.144.79 (talk) 08:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation? 

message: The plot summary is much too informal for Wikipedia.  I quote:
::The movie begins with a young woman,who was caught giving a blowjob to a guy, who attended a wedding party held in a hotel and became drunk, waking up in one of the hotel rooms; only to realize in horror that her kidney has been surgically removed. 
Can someone take the time to fix this?  Phrases like "giving a blowjob to a guy" need to be replaced. Phiwum (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desparate need of attention!
Talk:Diego Boneta

message: He is going by his 2nd/maternal surname "Boneta" now this comes to his U.S deput/cross-over. So can somebody change it please as I am unable to.--Anen87 (talk) 02:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide any reliable link or something which could support your claim. Bill william comptonTalk   03:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: His star/hollywood/stage name seems to be Diego Boneta now he is using his mother's surname like Javier Bardem see official website, offical youtube channel, IMDB,  E! Online, EW and other big media news outlet.--Anen87 (talk) 03:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'll do it but it will take little time as there is already a redirect to this article from "Diego Boneta". I've applied for its deletion, as soon as any admin deletes it, I'll rename the article as you suggested. Bill william comptonTalk   04:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks so much.--Anen87 (talk) 16:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article change Name to Boneta
Talk:Gamera vs. Jiger

message: The section on the home video release claims that a scene depicting an elephant's trunk having larvae removed from it is often "mistaken" for real stock footage, but none of the citations given support the claim that this is a "mistaken" belief. They are all just reviews calling it real stock footage. A cursory google search turns up no information describing the footage being created with effects, only references to it being "real stock footage."   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.152.189 (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Obscure stuff like this is always hard to source. But do we really need a source to say that an obviously simulated special effect is simulated, not reality? In a giant monster movie, no less. I'm not saying I was there when they were filming, or that I'm an expert of special effects, but it's clearly fake. Entertaining the idea that it could be real is misleading, as it adds undue weight to the article per WP:UNDUE. It is, however, noteworthy. I can't find a single reliable source for describing that scene (saying that there is a "debate" or "controversy" or "speculation" isn't true, because no one noteworthy is talking about it), and honestly, the sources cited aren't reliable for anything either. So I'll be removing those. If you've found any sources worth using I'd invite you to share them. Friginator (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Elephant Scene Claims not Supported

message: Well of course they should be merged-- They're the same movie, just different transliterations from the Japanese. Redirect one to the other. I think the "Jiger" spelling is more appropriate than "Jaiga" here, as an English-language source, but either is fine. -- Rizzleboffin 05:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Madhouse (2004 film)

message: I'm the one that's expanded the story section from just a mere paragraph, but I've never got around to writing the ending - I've lost the DVD. Someone needs to finish off the plot section, otherwise it looks like the movie ends when Drake is caught, which it doesn't. If I find the DVD, I'll finish it off proper - but if YOU have the DVD, you might wanna finish it ASAP. Anyhow, sorry I forgot to post this sooner; I'm just very forgetful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.72.207 (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the meantime, somebody shortened the plot in such a way that it makes no sense whatsoever anymore. — PDD 18:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete Story
Talk:Meenaxi: A Tale of Three Cities

message: Proposal to merge the article Meenaxi (soundtrack) into this article Meenaxi: A Tale of Three Cities. The content together is better for reading. Also the destination page size can accommodate merger. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  17:17, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal  
Talk:Rachael Sage

message: Please see her statements in her biography on her official website that is listed under External links at the bottom of this article.  Thank you CyntWorkStuff 05:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  as per Ms. Sage's bio she is an american musician of jewish heritige  

message: have put back the correct link for 2006 interview w/Ms. Sage published in biMagazine, asume that it had been removed because it was pointing to wrong place, if it had been removed for some other reason please discuss CyntWorkStuff 19:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed link to 2006 Interview 

message: one, this is written like a record label bio-- to sell cds, or something. i also don't get why there's no mention of sexuality or anything in the article but it still is part of a series of articles on bisexuality? how does that make any sense? Lequis (talk) 15:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ms. Sage is a well know bisexual artist, but that is not to say she doesn't have great x-over apeal from what I understand.  Sorry you don't like the tone, perhaps you might think of doing a rewite?CyntWorkStuff (talk) 20:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  two things 

message: The publicist has put on a new photo, but has not provided any information that it is freely distributable. K8 fan (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new photo 

message: I propose we take the next logical step and include Sage's birth name as it appears in sources.
I have not yet seen a WP:SECONDARY source that gives Sage's birth name in the form of first name / middle name / surname. There are several sources saying Karen Weitzman, and one saying Rachael Weitzman. The trademark registration of "Rachael Sage Productions" was filed by Karen R. Weitzman in 1995, shown in a few public filings online which we cannot use as a source per WP:DOB because it is a primary source document. However, this stuff was compiled in books and published as a reference. The tome titled Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, volume 1262, number 4, shows on page 947 that Karen Weitzman is the owner of the "MPress Records" and "Rachael Sage" trademarks. And the reference book series Brands and Their Companies by Gale Cengage (Edition 29, 2007, page 1531. ) shows "Weitzman, Karen Rachael" as the holder of the trademark "Rachael Sage". Binksternet (talk) 08:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Binksternet. Per WP:BLPPRIMARY "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source ..." It looks like there is enough to support "born Karen Rachael Weitzman", and it is now largely a question of choosing the highest quality secondary AND primary sources whilst avoiding citation overkill. Edwardx (talk) 10:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Include birth name?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-05-29/Semi-protection

message: "Semi-protection tweaks prompt debate over ideals" is the kind of title about which jokes are made. Read it like so:
* (Semi-protection tweaks) prompt (debate over ideals)
* (Semi-protection) tweaks (prompt debate over ideals)
Why is the debate so prompt? How did semi-protection tweak the debate? Headlines like this are notably difficult for non-native English speakers to read. The thoroughly confused might try to parse it with debate as the verb, and wonder who the semi-protection tweaks are who are prompt(ly) debating. Or is the debate over?
A better headline would be:
* Semi-protection modifications lead to debate about principles
* Semi-protection changed, leading to debate over ideals
These would be somewhat more readable without reparsing. --FOo 05:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Call me odd, but it parses fine for me.  Ral315 (talk) 06:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:CANSLIM

message: This article is feeling more and more like a promotional piece.  For example, in the list of external references, all but one are from the same website, investors.com .  In order to remain on Wikipedia, this article needs to include more information from third-party sources, which verify the notability of the subject.  Please refer to Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Spam, and Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines. --Elonka 05:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too promotional 

message: I only did this because of the lack of sources initially. I'll try to find some more third-party sources. Thanks
--Mr. Business 02:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article still badly needs third-party sources which prove that the subject is notable, per WP:CORP.  If sources cannot be provided, this info should probably be merged into William O'Neill's article. --Elonka 19:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Both the article and pages that come up on a Google search are inconsistent between "CANSLIM" and "CAN SLIM" -- which one is it? --EEMeltonIV 00:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One or two words? 

message: William J. O'Neil consistently refers to it as CAN SLIM or Can Slim, in How to Make Money In Stocks 3rd Edition. Mr Business 15:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAN SLIM name? 

message: Does anyone know of some long-term historical performance data that someone may have accumulated by following this system? I know there's a lot of leeway in the strategy, but a couple good examples of historical returns and risk measurements (beta or standard deviation) would be a good addition to any discussion about a trading strategy. Scott Teresi (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 03:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any objective historical data? 

message: Check Talk:CAN SLIM#Merge duplicates. —jisok 06:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge