lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inflorescence

message: I will be glad if someone can identify the species of this inflorescence :Image:Inflorescence 1.jpg and put it. thanks. --vineeth 17:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like Euphorbia pulcherrima (Poinsettia) - Marshman 18:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is, when i saw the picture of the bush , :Image:Poinsettia_bush_belize.jpg i could identify it. I am not a biologist but very sure that the appearance of bush is same :) --vineeth 18:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo identity 

message: This article is very inaccurate.
*Determinate/indeterminate: Explain better
*Raceme: Should come before corymb
*Cyme: Explain types
*Head: It can also be determinate. Other inflorescences, like the cyathium (not mentoned!) are pseudanthia.
*Spadex: Is a kind of spike
*Ament and catkin are the same thing
*Solitary: is not an inflorescence
*The poinsettia has a corymb of cyathia, not florets
*Many, many other things
Please, improve this article. Aelwyn 08:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate article 

message: Hi! I have some questions. This article has been completely re-written recently.
* Don't you think articles like panicle, raceme, umbel, pedicel are now unuseful?
* Do you think that cone doesn't belong here?
* Should spadix ad catkin be listed in the 'Other' section and have their own for a more in-depth description, just like cyathium?
* Is there a name in english for the spike-like inflorescence of Mentha longifolia (italian: spicastro, german: Scheinähre)
* Do you think that the thyrse comes conceptually before the panicle?
* Another name for Other section? Maybe 'Specialised inflorescences'?
* Assessment? Still at Start level?
Aelwyn 12:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some questions 

message: This page refers to "definite" inflorescences. Should that read "determinate"?
Nadiatalent (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. I've asked for review much time ago, but it didn't help. I'm no native English speaker, so my only answer is 'possibly'. Sorry Aelwyn (talk) 19:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Word not used in article. 86.139.166.113 (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "anthocarp" redirect here? 

message: Hi! For a class project, I am going to try to improve and expand this article (likely focusing on current research regarding inflorescences). This are some potential sources I may use, and I would appreciate it if anyone had any insight or comments regarding them. Thanks! Parisornthep (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography for Potential Edits 

message: Many facts do not seem to be linked to a certain source Colgateplants (talk) 19:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Paradise (Morrison novel)

message: This article's plot summary, aside from only describing the first three chapters, exhibits an incredibly poor quality of writing. While I understand that Paradise is a very difficult novel to summarize, the section's incompleteness and stylistic sloppiness is not particularly helpful to readers. If no one objects, I would like to remove the section altogether and replace it with a brief summary that gives an overview of the entire novel. 
Thurn&Taxis (talk) 22:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess nobody objects. --Pa2chant.bis (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Plot" Section?
Talk:Field Artillery Branch (United States)

message: This is a good article on the US Army Field Artillery.  I think that it should be included as a heading under Artillery.  As Wikipedia is not a dictionary, dividing up the information only makes it harder to find.--Counsel 17:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I think that there is certainly room for a detailed article on the US Army's artillery, or perhaps artillery in the United States in general (including the USMC).  I think that the distinction between Field Artillery and field artillery (with caps and without) is too subtle a distinction.  How about moving the article on the US artillery to something like "United States Field Artillery".  In doing so, I think a heading on the main Artillery page with a short entry about US artillery with a link to the longer article would serve.--Counsel 17:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I found this tidbit from the Center for Military History at http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/ohpam.html.  Since there's no separate article for the 5th Field Artillery, I thought someone might find a way to mention the unit in this article. Mingusboodle (talk) 03:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st Battalion, 5th Field Artillery

message: WOW didnt reilize there was a CW club that was to good to link to the official histories. Brian in denver (talk) 00:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cival war club
Talk:Universal Decimal Classification

message: Much of the text of this article seems to be taken directly from the UDC Consortium's web page, which is not to my knowledge public domain text. I am not an expert on UDC, so I don't feel competent to rewrite the entire article.  Perhaps some helpful librarian will come along and repair?
--Scrapironjaw 17:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not public domain? 

message: External link seems to have moved to http://aleria.net/  
— DIV (128.250.204.118 07:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: System seems to have been used for cataloguing articles in Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas.  
— DIV (128.250.204.118 07:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recueil 

message: According to http://www.udcc.org/ec22_2000.htm, I am altering the Theology/Religion section on the main table. There were other tables revised under E&C 22, if anyone cares to change them, they should.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olegkagan (talk • contribs) 01:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  E&C 22 

message: From the UDC homepage:
Conditions of Use
UDC Summary is the intellectual property of the UDC Consortium and was released by the UDC Consortium in October 2009 under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license. With this licence you may copy and reuse the UDC Summary on condition that you attribute the work to the UDC Consortium. Any redistribution should be under the same licence. 
I'll make this clear on the main page.--Red Deathy (talk) 09:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Melus of Bari

message: Is "freedon-fighter" an unnecessarily jarring anachronism? --Wetman 04:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I used it on purpose because I believe I read him called that somewhere. It did sound anachronistic. I have never read that he had an ambition to carve his own principality though. Srnec 04:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the article, it is stated 'In 1010, they took Ascoli and Troina' with links to Ascoli Picento and Troina, Sicily.
John Julius NorwichNorwich, John Julius The Normans in the South, 1016-1130 (2010). Faber Finds.  p14.  states that they took 'Ascoli and Trani'. Trani seems far more likely than Troina, which is 614km away from Bari in what was Saracen occupied Sicily at the time. Trani is 45km up the coast; Trani is a far more likely option.
Ascoli Picento is 403km away from Bari. It is most unlikely that this would have been a target for Melus given the distance involved and the fact that it would have been part of the Duchy of Spoleto at the time and therefore outside the area that the Byzantine Empire controlled. Ascoli Satriano is 135km away but would have been held by the Byzantines and is thus a more obvious target.
This choice coincides with a map in the early pages of Before The Normans by Barbara M. KreutzKreutz, Barbara M. Before The Normans, Southern Italy in the Ninth & Tenth Centuries (1991). University of Pennsylvania Press.  map. 3 that shows Ascoli to be what is now known as Ascoli Satriano.
Martinjhawkins (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are links to places correct? 
Talk:Medway Valley line

message: Does it go beyond Paddock Wood to Tonbridge ? The line stops at Paddock Wood but do services continue to Tonbridge ? Pickle 17:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pickle, There doesn't seem to be any through service - the journey from Strood to Tonbridge via Paddock Wood seems to take just under an hour, with about a ten minute wait for a connection at Paddock Wood. Hope that helps!  Lynbarn 09:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In general the service operates as a shuttle between Strood and Paddock Wood. It works reliably, and is not affected by delays/problems on other routes.  In the peak, there is an odd through train to London Bridge, but in general you do need to change at Paddock Wood. Canterberry 20:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, at the time (i think!) i was wondering about the obscure services that end up at Horsham via Gatwick and where they originate from, etc. Pickle 14:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Paddock Wood to Tonbridge is part of the South Eastern Main Line. The diagram needs altering to show the junction to Tovil Goods above Tovil Station as trains on the goods line did not pass through the passenger station. Mjroots 19:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Line

message: Hi, Are Class 465 / 466 still used on this line?, Having looked on Flickr it seems only Classes 375/6/7/8/9 is used but having not been on a train in 4-5 years I could be wrong and it may well be used ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 465 / 466
Template talk:User England

message: Please post suggestions for revision on this page for review before messing around with the template. -- Scjessey 18:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a discussion and proposal regarding the changing of content and wording in United Kingdom location/nationality userbox templates located at Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Location/United Kingdom. - Hayter 20:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content Change

message: I would think there are similar issues here as with concerns I expressed regarding recent changes to Scotland related userboxes (now reverted) but I thought I'd leave it to those for whom it was closer to home to consider. Mutt Lunker (talk) 15:27, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Arms
Template talk:Campaignbox Operations in North Alabama

message: One battle does not constitute a campaign.  Either more battles should be incorporated into this campaignbox, or this campaignbox should be deleted or absorbed by another campaignbox. Roy Al Blue 18:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A little history on the origins of these Campaign templates is in order.  They originally all came from following this list from the Civil War Sites Advisory Committee at the National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program, and as you can see, there are many on the list that have only one battle. It may be counter-intuitive, but a campaignbox with just one battle in it actually imparts value. It's important to understand what a Military campaign is and is not. It is not merely a list of battles. To over simplify, a campaign is strategic while a battle is tactical. A campaign can cover thousands of miles with zero, one, or few battles fought. It could be argued that the most successful campaign would achieve its goals with not a single battle fought and zero casualties on either side – but with the strategic aims of its planner fulfilled.  See Tudor Vladimirescu#Uprising. His campaign started in January 1821 and in May 1821 it was over with no battles fought, just an advance on, and occupation of Bucharest in March and two months rule. Then the retreat of Tudor's army in May, as the Ottomans occupied Bucharest without meeting resistance. That's still a campaign. These campaign lists were developed as they were for a reason, by professional historians, and changing them to be grouped, for example, geographically with other battles that are part of a different campaign, loses context and conflates campaigns which may have been carried out in different years and planned by different commanders. And having a campaignbox, even one with only one battle, also gives a  consistent appearance on every battle article that is part of the WP:MILHIST project. I believe that's part of the WP:MILHIST style guide, but I'm not 100% certain. A campaignbox with one battle still imparts information of the CWSAC campaign name (for example Template:Campaignbox Jackson's Operations Against the B&O Railroad) and also gives a starting point for an article on the campaign itself as in Streight's Raid and for adding minor battles and skirmishes not rated by the CWSAC such as Template:Campaignbox Mine Run Campaign where the minor engagement Battle of Charlestown was added at some point by an editor to join the CWSAC rated Battle of Mine Run. Mojoworker (talk) 06:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: One Battle Campaign?
Talk:Shades of Death Road

message: Are any of the photographs online?  I would like to see them. --jeffrey elliot 13:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MYSTERIOUS POLAROIDS 

message: I have found two things in common with each photograph I have seen from http://www.abandonedbutnotforgotten.com/Polaroid%20Trail%20.htm: They are each of Mila Kunis or a person that looks like her, and they are each of her on a television set. User:BobManPerson 19:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polaroids 

message: "Ghost Lake (officially nameless)..."  
What "officially" are we using here?  The NJ forest service signs in the area all identify the lake with this name, and it appears on the NJDEP park maps for Jenny Jump State Forest.  It's possible that some specific regulatory bodies like the USGS don't name the lake, but that isn't necessarily what "officially nameless" implies.  Any objection to dropping the phrase?Elmo iscariot (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The lake is indeed unnamed on USGS maps, which does mean that as far as the federal government is concerned it doesn't have a name (you can always petition the US Board of Geographic Names to have it named that officially). I'll change the wording. Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Splendid.  Thankee.  Elmo iscariot (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Lake 

message: There is a ravine known as "Shades of Death" on the eastern side of Jenny Jump Mountain in early times. Schrabisch reports this in Archaeology of Warren and Hunterdon County while talking about a sizeable ancient indian burial ground site. --ColonelHenry (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name origins

message: Read clearly and loudly 2600:1002:B01A:A852:A063:8142:BFD3:6BAF (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shades of death rd
Talk:Action Park

message: This article feels like it's trying to prove a point. Many sections read like this: this is the ride, and this is how it's dangerous. 65.96.125.113 (talk) 12:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since that is a part of the sourced coverage, it's relevant and encyclopedic ... after all, four people died in different accidents on these rides, and lots more were injured. The mere juxtaposition of two reliably sourced facts is not POV. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV concerns?

message: I noticed the page notice was created by  in 2010 and I can only imagine the need back then with trying to maintain reliable sources on here due to the article's unique history. However, we have better tools in place such as requesting page protection to maintain articles if there are disputes. Should the page notice be removed? I think a lot of urban legends have been toned down now especially with the Class Action Park documentary. Thoughts? – The Grid (talk)  21:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I don't think the notice is needed anymore. There isn't really any adding to the page that requires it and everything else and even what the notice is advising is covered in Wikipedia policies and Manual of Styles. NZFC(talk)(cont) 21:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine if we want to do that. At the time a lot more unsourced stuff was likely to be added. I mean, protection was available then, too, but we just didn't use it (and TBH the way things have gone since then have actually suggested I was maybe worrying too much). Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember reading this article a while back. I can't remember if it was from digg back in the day or reddit. I think the Page Notice was sufficient back then as it seemed a lot of people wanted to share their experience on here. I don't think it was worrying too much. – The Grid (talk)  14:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Page Notice has been removed. – The Grid (talk)  18:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Notice 

message: Action Park opened on , it closed on , however it reopened on .
Park                    	Opened	Closed 	Length operating
Original Action Park    	      	       	
Mountain Creek Waterpark	      	       	
Revived Action Park     	      	Present	
--2603:6011:E02:E4D4:4D80:38F2:4182:669E (talk) 20:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopened in 2014 

message: "Landing at the end of a waterslide"?  What does this supposedly show, and why is it important?  38.73.253.217 (talk) 06:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone apparently thought the article needed a whole bunch of their old family photos, which I wouldn't disagree with given the paucity of images it had beforehand. We could probably lose that one, though. Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah.  I'm gonna 86 it.  Thanks. 38.73.253.217 (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  pic
Talk:White Manna

message: I removed the little anecdote about the reason there's only one "n" in the name, mainly because it doesn't make any sense: both n's are obviously still there. Just take a look at the website: two n's. Maybe there was a time when it only had one "n" (must be before my time, because I've been going there for many years) but at present it most definitely has two. Kafziel Talk 20:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: I suggest the importance of this article is raised.  A visit to either of these restaurants is a life-changing event.  Going to White Manna is more important then getting married, attending your high-school or college graduation, or attending the same for your children. -TehZorroness 00:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Zianon Pazniak

message: "In 1996 Zianon Pazniak had to leave the country to escape a potential arrest or even liquidation by the forces of the Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenka. He was granted political asylum in the United States."
This is pure speculation, and hardly neutral, impartial or even informative. Opinion isn't really what an encyclopedia is for (online or otherwise).
You could as easily speculate that Pazniak left to try and get US support to put him in power and have Lukashenko arrested. I suggest that the article sticks to the facts!
Can someone with knowledge on the subject correct the verb absolvated?  There is no such word and so the meaning is abmiguous.
The article means to say that Zianon Pazniak graduated from university (I've looked this up in the Belarusian and Russian Wikis for verification.) This has now been cleaned up along with some other instances of grammatical ungainliness.
- 63.215.27.199 20:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shirky's Law

message: In response to the prod "made up law", please review the Adage#List of some modern adages. They were all coined at some point, and their survival depends on their pithiness and utility. Hugh MacLeod mentioned this one in a blog post and I looked it up in Wikipedia before checking his archives. You may argue that this one isn't widespread enough to deserve an entry yet (merge with Clay Shirky?), but I hadn't heard all the ones in adage, either, so how are they less "made up"? Vagary 18:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:USS LSM(R)-189

message: On April 12, 1945 S1c Theodore Hall and F2c Fred Goodwin were knocked overboard by the impact of the crashed Kamikaze but later rescued.Olwillard (talk) 15:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

message: My uncle, Chief Diesel Mechanic, Alex Barthel,served on LSMR 189 Olwillard (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: LSM(R) 189

message: My father, Charles Asimus was a signalman on the 189, and has shared many stories regarding the Okinawa Operation on March 29 and April 12, 1945.  Most importantly, The President of the United States presented the LSM(R)189 with the Navy Unit Commendation for this operation.  The Citation reads as follows:
"For outstanding heroism in action against enemy Japanese aircraft and suicide boats.  While on an aggressive patrol off Okinawa, she engaged and destroyed three enemy suicide boats and assisted other vessels in repelling a determined air attack. Later, while on a radar picket station engaged in a task far exceeding her designed employment, while in company with a destroyer and another LSM(R), without air coverage, she successfully brought down three of eight attacking planes.  When the accompanying destroyer was violently attacked and sunk within two minutes, the LSM(R) 189 proceeded at full speed to pick up survivors.  While courageously fighting off further attacks during which she herself was hit by a suicide plane, she courageously rescued one hundred and fifty men of the destroyer's crew.  Her courageous determination and effort were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolhallbauer (talk • contribs) 16:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LSM(R) 189
Talk:Lululemon Athletica

message: Unsure if this is just my perception, but the phrasing in the Marketing section of this article sounds like it's advertising lululemon. I'd edit it to be more objective, but I'm unsure if that is necessary Sparechair (talk) 04:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it did have that feeling. I've edited it for neutrality. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing of "Marketing" section 

message: It’s time to boycott Lululemon 173.80.249.17 (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boycott Lululemon 

message: Where does this quote in the 2nd paragraph of the article come from? The citation linking to a Business Insider piece does not actually have it anywhere.
It is clear based on several articles that the founder stated, "It's funny to watch them try and say it," referring to the Japanese and the name Lululemon, but I am not seeing the follow-up "it was the only reason behind the name" anywhere. Is this simply made up?
XenocideTalk|Contributions 18:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added here by an anonymous user. I suspect it was straight-forward vandalism. --Yamla (talk) 18:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "it was the only reason behind the name" 

message: This paragraph under 'Env Impact' reads as corporate mission statement advert. No citation; no apparent reason for inclusion. 2600:8804:7600:12:F800:322B:5A02:531E (talk) 08:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be Well propaganda
Talk:Specific name (zoology)

message: It seems like a number of formal references use "species epithet" - is there a source for this being informal and "specific name" being the preferred term ? Shyamal (talk) 13:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Species epithet" is indeed another correct way of referring to the specific name. I have included it in the first intro sentence. Invertzoo (talk) 16:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal name 

message: I do needs back my privacy 💯 105.112.61.237 (talk) 10:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put an end to all my stressed