Talk:Mite

message: Is there a way to keep mites off of you? I stuck my hand in a Starling's nest, and I got a bunch of mites...
thanks,
--e. 01:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there??

message: Does the number 45 000 refer to the number of identified species, or the total number of species anticipated to exist (out of which we seems to have found 5 %)? \Mike(z) 10:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please, this needs clarification! --345Kai 23:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done; 45,000 refers to the number of named species, there are many many more undescribed. IronChris  |  (talk) 00:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  45 000 

message: Any experts out there? This article is close to a stub.
Why do there have to be pictures? Ugh, I have those things in me right now, thank you very much!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.89.42 (talk) 04:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, I know.  It's very easy to get skeeved out by these things. KenFehling (talk) 07:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More 

message: Anyone care to add information on birdmites? There is some scary information on birdmites.org and not sure how much of it is true, as it is commercially backed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.77.54 (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  birdmites 

message: I've just tried to add a link from this page to de:Milben. But I can't, because Milben is already linked from Acari. I don't have time to figure out the details of yet another wikisomething. Does somebody want to figure out how to make this work? GyroMagician (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language links 

message: *Before starting to expand this article, I put it through the Earwig copyvio detector and got worrying results, so I sought advice from the Copyright problems noticeboard. I asked "How can I tell whether the article is copying the websites concerned or vice-versa?" Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *Re: the Flickr match, our article text appears to predate the Flickr upload, so we're good there. Re: the .gr match, the site looks dodgy which immediately set off alarm bells for a likely backwards copy.  If you look in the history of the article, you can see that the en.wiki text evolved to the text of that website -- this diff and the subsequent diff (and possibly other diffs as well).  So we're good there. The PRweb match is just a spam link at the bottom of the article (which I just removed) so we're good there too. In short, you can go ahead and expand the article without worrying about the potential copyright violations identified by the Earwig copyvio detector. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issues (resolved)

message: This is one of the most popular pages in Wikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicine's scope.  Very few editors watch WT:VET's pages, which means that questions may not be answered in a timely manner.  If you are an active editor and interested in animals or veterinary medicine, please put WT:VET on your watchlist.  Thank you,  WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:VET 

message: Greetings, today I asked for Arthropods expert help at Apalotacarus article - Check taxon, de-orphan article. Posted here hoping to find someone with knowledge about this subject. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article [[Apalotacarus]]