lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of awards named after people

message: These are the changes I am going to impose to bring this list to a higher standard apart from the addition of a table.
*Awards that have an article of its own is only included, no redirects.
*Awards that are named indirectly after a person, meaning awards directly named after a company or organisation that the person is named after is excluded unless a source is provided.
*As above but named after a sponsor is excluded.
*Sooner or later, I expect every one of these entries to be sourced.
*To make this list look better presented, entries will appear on a table like this below.
Award	Named after	Field            	Achievement (The purpose of the award)                                                              	Source
     	           	American football	Honors a player's contribution to volunteer and charity work, as well as his excellence on the field	http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gStAqMroLECmaecDvdFrtckF1eDAD9DNKMR00
Donnie Park (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:River Wandle

message: "Where does the river enter Lambeth? Doesn't it flow through Wandsworth?" - Summary  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.247.252 (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ermita

message: This article seem to have a POV problem. Bluemask 13:43, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I understand that Lim's recent return as Mayor of Manila has led to a new cleanup/morality drive in Ermita.  This is not yet reflected in the article.  Can someone with more detailed knowledge please revise it?  Rodparkes 01:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status of nightlife in Ermita
Talk:Slater determinant

message: It might be worth adding a comment about how Slater determinants and Hartree products have the same eigenfunctions with a one-electron hamiltonian (because SDs are linear combinations of HPs) - might make the use of SDs seem more reasonable. Also perhaps a note on how antisymmetry can be enforced in a different way using second quantization. Cdr Harris Fan Club 14:57, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: It states in the article's very first sentence that it satisfies one the requirements of anti symmetry- that "phi" = 0, but does not define "phi" at all. What is "phi"? Need to clean up the language here a bit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.94.84 (talk) 01:42, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is "phi"? 

message: Could someone please elaborate on how a Slater determinant is the wedge product (as defined in a more general mathematical setting).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.44.210 (talk) 18:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to guess, but since a wedge product can be written as a determinant, someone (maybe even the author of a textbook) thought it would be beneficial to note that the inverse is also true. Lpd-Lbr (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wedge Product 

message: Therefore the Hartree product does not satisfy the Pauli principle; that is to say: on the one hand, the interchange of fermions must give rise to negation of the wave function because fermions must have antisymmetric wavefunctions, yet on the other hand, they should still be indistinguishable, meaning the exchange of particles does not change the results of measurements performed on the system and thus two particles cannot be distinguished from each other.
Can somebody who knows what it's actually trying to say fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.156.211 (talk • contribs) 
:Does my edit help? --Bduke  (Discussion) 22:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for worst sentence ever: 

message: Can somebody please add more intuition to the Detailed example [7], many electron problem. It seems that if all ri go to r (constant) or all Ri go to R, the energy explodes which doesn't seem to make physical sense. Isn't it so that there are repulsive forces between the particles? Is there a sign mistake or something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.238.197.125 (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed example
Talk:SpaceShipOne

message: (Doradus) Recently, the phrase "which is powered by rubber and laughing gas" was deleted.  However, the phrase is correct.  Can the information be reworked into the article?
:It's probably more appropriate on the Tier One page, where it is mentioned, although they use the equivalent term nitrous oxide (in two different places) for laughing gas. Jwolfe 09:38, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Rubber and laughing gas

message: Is this right?
I've added NOx to the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.218.56 (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  relatively non-polluting ?
Talk:Donald Hamilton

message: The article says his output was all paperback originals, but very early on some of his work came out in hardcover runs.  For instance, I have a hardcover copy of Steel Mirror.  But I don't know enough about the publishing history to be sure the hardcover came first.
John Enright
:At least his first three novels were hardbacks -- I've put that into the article. Hayford Peirce 20:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hardcover? 

message: Can anyone verify the Carr quote about Cloud Cuckoo Land ? No one would characterize Matt Helm's world as "unrealistically idealistic state where everything is perfect". Nitpyck (talk) 04:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  check a quote
Talk:Whataburger

message: Website seems to be blocked here in Europe? 77.183.145.255 (talk) 21:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "The request is blocked"

message: The map showing counties with Whataburger locations claims to be from the Whataburger site, but is incorrect. I cannot locate anything on the site. There are more accurate maps circulating online, but no provenance is given.
Joewhite (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Map of US Counties with Whataburgers incorrect

message: The chain had one restaurant in Oxnard, California.  At some time it changed the name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.149.135.25 (talk) 19:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lot-a-burger

message: Hi editors, I'm Miranda and I work for Whataburger. I noticed that there are some things in the infobox that are out of date, for example the Key people line. Would someone be willing to update the "Key people" list based on this source?
I was thinking it would look something like this:
 
 
Please let me know what you think! I'm happy to answer any questions you may have. Because of my conflict of interest, I won't make any edits directly. Thanks in advance! Miranda at Whataburger (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  thank you so much! I did notice I made a small typo. Could you change Rich Sheffler to Rich Scheffler, with a "c"? I'd really appreciate it! Miranda at Whataburger (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for doing that AngusWOOF! Miranda at Whataburger (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key people update request 

message: Hi editors, Miranda here again with another request. I've got a handful of ideas for content updates and changes but I thought I'd keep these pretty small and bite sized. 
My next thought was to add the corporate leadership to the article body. It's my understanding that the infobox should reflect information in the article body, so I thought it would make sense to add the leadership to the Corporate affairs section as a new subheading. 
I also thought it might be a good idea to include some updated numbers as far as restaurants and revenue goes, so I included that as well. I thought this subsection might look a little something like this:
What do other editors think? I'm happy to discuss it if you have any questions.  would you be willing to take a look at this request as well? It's pretty similar to the last one, just in a different place. I'd really appreciate it! Miranda at Whataburger (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Corporate affairs update
Category talk:Legendary creatures

message: Maybe this category should be merged with :Category:Legendary species? --Conti 16:00, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Conti 11:50, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: I think a fictional creature is any creature that doesn't actually exist. Anything that exists (only) in fiction is fictional. However to be Legendary a creature must be part of a Legend - a story of particular power or significance. Thus the creatures of Greek myth are both legendary and fictional. Alien creatures from a TV show are just fictional. DJ Clayworth 13:29, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: When does a fictional creature become a legendary creature? For instance, I changed the categories of Goblin and Goblinoid because they had little info in the way of myths or legends. What exactly is a legend? Any story more than 50 years old? 100? ··gracefool |☺ 02:40, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: I don't think we are going to be able to pin this down exactly. Certainly it's necessary for a story to be fairly old before it is a legend. Something also needs to be 'well know' as a story, and preferably without a known author. I might make some exceptions there for tales that are old enough to be retold again and again, even if the author is known (possibly Cyclops is allowed as legendary here). My view is:
Anything with a known author is not legendary unless very old indeed. So no Orcs, no Puppeteers, no Gorns, no monsters from Doom. Cyclops, Pegasus, Centaur is OK; same with similar creatures from other mythologies. 
I think that's a pretty good first rule. If you can name the person or group who invented the creature, it's not legendary. DJ Clayworth 16:04, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I'm currently trying to move all the single-creature articles currently sitting in the general "legendary creatures" category into appropriate subcategories. If I put something in a subcategory that isn't appropriate, please put it where it belongs instead of just moving it back to the broader category. Thanks. Kotengu 小天狗 22:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up

message: - subcategories listing male (or overwhelmingly male), intersex/hermaphroditic/non binary or genderless legendary creatures.
Kind regards,
Croak!ichi (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are missing subcategories for creatures of the other (than female) sexes/genders -
Talk:Backlash (sociology)

message: The list in this article is totally haphazard. It should get a disambiguation page for some of it, and the rest should be canned, due to irrelevance or red links of arbitrary wording. Amber388 18:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 9 October 2006

message: To IP editor:   If you can provide reliable sources for your preferred version that will work better than what is there--WHICH HAS NO SOURCES AT ALL. Google scholar is an easy free way to find good sources:  . --David Tornheim (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Respectfully, I feel like you are making this a big deal when it is not.  The previous version did not have any citations, so the admonishment in this regard is also applicable to the original version (and the attempted reversion).  Second, this is not an edit "war;" if you believe that the previous version, written at a high school level, consisted of better grammar and sentence structure, please feel free to revert back. Similarly, please feel free to find your own scholarly sources and add your own contributions rather than trying to moderate a "war" that does not exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:249:8300:593C:748B:BF6D:BEDE:6E34 (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I already replied to you on your talk page:  User talk:2601:249:8300:593C:748B:BF6D:BEDE:6E34 --David Tornheim (talk) 13:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I was hoping you would add WP:RS.  I added numerous articles from Google Scholar--as I had suggested above.  I'm not sure they are what you want... If you think there is something better, please feel free to put it in instead.  --David Tornheim (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP editor desiring changes 

message: In the talk section immediately above, I had suggested adding WP:RS to this article to an editor who wanted changes.  Months have gone by and there was still no WP:RS.  I used Google Scholar to add items that came up for sociology and backlash.  I'm not sure they are the best.  I very much welcome better WP:RS.  I figured it would be better to have less than perfect RS than none at all.  
I changed the tags to reflect that there is now WP:RS, but that better WP:RS might be available. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Category talk:Lists of fictional animals

message: For a bit of discussion, see Wikipedia talk:Categorization, topic "More on category piping, alphabetic headers, page organization".  Elf | Talk 16:16, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * shouldn't this category be named "fictional animals" instead of "list of fictional animals"? After all, a category page is a list and so, therefore a category page named "list of.." is somewhat redundant. --Mecanismo 01:53, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  category naming 

message: Removed this from :Category:lists of fictional species because these are real species, but imaginary animals.  Added instead to :Category:lists of fictional characters. Matchups 03:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  supercategory 

message: In a number of these lists of fictional animals, mythological, legendary and folkloric animals have been added. For example, the List of fictional birds article and the List of fictional cats as well as others lists include animals from mythology, legend and folklore. This is currently the standard practice in these articles but I can see how this can be a problem for some people. Some cultures/religions believe and have believed that these animals are real so there may be a problem with calling them "fictional" because that implies they don't actually exist and this can be construed as expressing a particular POV. It would be possible to create lists of animals in mythology, legend and folklore but this would create new problems. For example, should animals mentioned in the Bible be categorized as fictional or mythological? The Bible can be regarded as literature and therefore animals like Noah's dove or the serpent in the Garden of Eden belong in the list of fictional animals. However, the Bible can also be regarded as religion and therefore these animals do not belong on this list. This is true in many cases when particular texts (Jewish, Christian, Hindu, pagan, etc.) can be regarded as either a work of literature (fiction) or as a religions text (nonfiction to believers). To get around this difficulty, I think that a different term than "fictional" should be used to describe these lists. This term should encompass both fictional (as in characters from literature, film, etc.) and mythological/legendary/folkloric animals. I'm not sure what term would work and any ideas would be appreciated. If this issue has been discussed before, please link to that page.-Schnurrbart (talk) 01:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with term "fictional"
Talk:Mary Magdalene

message: "According to John 20:1–10, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb alone when it was still dark and saw that the stone had already been rolled away."
John 20:1-10 does not say Mary Magdalen was alone, but only that she went to the tomb, there is no mention that she was specifically/explicitly alone, and whoever wrote this clearly had the intention of trying to make John's telling of the event contradictory to the synoptics.
Here is what John says: 
"Early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb and saw that the stone had been removed from the entrance. 2 So she came running to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one Jesus loved, and said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”
This type of editorializing should not be allowed. SimonBarJonah (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Error in Life Section
Talk:Baker Street tube station

message: Has anybody else noticed that the first photo in this news story is :File:BakerStreetOriginalPlatforms1863.jpg? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo re-use 

message: Bank station also has ten platforms even though one DLR platform is for setting down and the other for picking up.  AsparagusTips (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of platforms

message: This is all about the lines than run through the station.  Not enough about the station itself. What about the original entrance to Baker St which was demolished, etc. 2.121.172.239 (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough about the station
Talk:Thermoset

message: Is something that cures through chemistry really a Thermoset? From the name derivation it would appear unlikely. DJ Clayworth 17:31, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: should this page be combined with Thermosetting_plastic? or vice-versa. Pud 21:41, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  combine pages?
Talk:Pope Gregory XVI

message: There any proof of his strange will? As reported in this aincent SciAm? Thanx 69.142.2.68 02:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will? 

message: Leo XIII was the penultimately surviving cardinal appointed by Gregory XVI
Jackiespeel 19:12, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: "In March 1825 he was created Cardinal by Pope Leo XII (1823–29), and shortly afterwards was entrusted with an important mission to adjust a concordat regarding the interests of the Catholics of Walloon in the Protestant dominated Netherlands. ...... Gregory XVI was the last man (thus far) elected Pope who was not already a bishop."
Doesn't the fact that he was a cardinal - a higher rank than a bishop - imply that he must have been considered a bishop?  Doesn't the fact that he went straight from priest to cardinal mean that his bishopric was subsumed?  JackofOz 00:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not already a bishop?

message: Were there museums founded by Pope Gregory XVI?: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=http://mv.vatican.va/2_IT/pages/MGE/MGE_Main.html&ei=s1pKT6KAGqby0gG9yJiXDg&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3DMuseo%2BGregoriano%2BEtrusco%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1024%26bih%3D585%26prmd%3Dimvns
Twillisjr (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vatican Museums Founded by Pope Gregory XVI 

message: Currently the article states that Gregory XVI was born on 18 September 1765. However, the Catholic Encyclopedia gives the 8 September 1765 as his date of birth (as does his entry in Catholic hierarchy). I would like to have the current entry backed up by a robust source. Gugganij (talk) 10:56, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting birth dates - please provide source 

message: Why is there a long quote from a letter opposing slavery? It seems sufficient to summarize the contents. This pope issued nine encyclicals, but we don't quote even a word of any of them. This seems like far too much weight, absent any other discussion of its impact. 2603:8000:E4F0:87A0:1CAD:3815:A234:C088 (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I copied the intro of In supremo apostolatus which summarizes the document. The article have incompatible reference systems, though. Maybe a bot can fix it. 2603:8000:E4F0:87A0:81E2:8C65:F2EA:2410 (talk) 07:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Slavery quote
Talk:Ascanius

message: :Aeneas escaped...:
Probably it is meant that Ascanius escaped.... Andres 17:54, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason there is confusion on this is because the other principle source on the Alban line of kings, Dionysius of Halicarnassus in his Roman Antiquities, claimed that Ascanius was the half-brother of Silvius. Psychotic Spartan   18:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i had a draft Iulus which was discarded to somebody thinking Iulus was identical to King Ascanius which isn't nessecarily true in my opinion my reason is Ascanius mother may have been Lavinia rather than Creusa who motherd Iulus and in it states that in the article on Julia Gens as well, in my humble opinion they can be considerd seperate figures, but hey that's just me i'd like to see everyone else's two cent's on this issue. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 05:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: any comments on 's proposal that his draft should become a separate article on Lulus? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Iulus with a capital "I", in English it's "Julus" with a "J". In the Aeneid it's claimed that Iulus was the namesake of the Iulii, more commonly known as the Julii. Basic information is missing. Why would Lulus with an L be the progenitor of the Julii with a J? SpartaN (talk) 22:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that clearification, . Nuclear Dragon and I had a discussion about how to spell the name at User talk:Curb Safe Charmer#Why does my draft keep on getting declined? and it is good to be able to settle that issue. My knowledge of the subject is nil, so can you also clear up for me for the purposes of AfC whether Iulus should be the subject of a standalone article, or a redirect? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Actually Ascanius might’ve still been Lulus/Julus but also son of Lavinia if the name lulus was mentioned as (possibly) son of Lavinia Emmanuelbruh (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to have a talk 

message: Silly question; should it be consistent outside of quotes? Seems like it should, but there might be some style guide thing I’m missing. DalekCheese (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iulus vs Julus
Talk:Tartiflette

message: The vote seemed to be split on whether to keep the recipe or to move it to Wikibooks. I'll just move the delete discussion and let this take its course. Johnleemk | Talk 13:10, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding VfD

message: I don't think this article should be deleted, and it doesn't read enough like a recipe to be added to wikibooks. On another note, is the opening part of this article not just a copy from http://www.bonjourlafrance.com/french-food/french-recipes/french-dishes/tartiflette.htm ?? I don't think tartiflette is a recent recipe (circa 1980s) but I believe the name is. Tartiflette is simply a newer name for the older dish Pela.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Decrease789 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying? 

message: From the second paragraph: "The word tartiflette is probably derived from the Arpitan word for potato, tartiflâ."
From the fourth paragraph: "The name derives from the Savoyard word for potatoes, tartifles, a term also found in Provençal."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taotriad (talk • contribs) 18:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology