lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wright Model B

message: This article is related to the United States, so it would seem that U.S. spelling should apply, per WP:ENGVAR, even though historically some British spellings were used in the article. Edison (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that many words in the article - any in particular you dont like! MilborneOne (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

text: OK I see you have changed licence and organisation (Board was a typo well spotted) - dont think anybody will object. MilborneOne (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I note that Wikipedia has had the effect of loosening up my spelling perception. I see enough instances of "analyse, fulfil, mediaeval, arguement, or defence" that I scarcely notice it is not the spelling I learned in school, and even with "licence" I had to check a dictionary to confirm it was no the U.S. version. Edison (talk) 22:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. spelling

message: Hi. Should the Astra-Wright BB on display in the museum at Le Bourget (Paris, France) not mentioned with the survivors? Not sure if it really is a version of the Model B! --Antheii (talk) 18:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model BB 

message: The Range is indicated as 110 miles, but the Model B according to Ken Hyde at the
Wright Experience used the same fuel system as the 1909 Military Flyer.
The Military Flyer had a 12 Gallon tank carrying about 75 lbs of fuel.  the fuel consumption was
25 lbs/hr which gave a 3hr endurance, which is about 136 miles.
Foulois was using a 20 gallon tank in his texas flights.
I don't know how to correct this without conducting original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patbahn (talk • contribs) 18:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  range 
Talk:Ryan XV-8

message: The article has the maximum speed of 105 mph (160 km/h) the The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft has a maximum speed of 65 mph (105 km/h). Can any one check another reference please to confirm the maximum speed. Thanks. MilborneOne 18:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maximum Speed
Talk:Missy Hyatt

message: I removed the link to the website http://www.missyhyatt.net because it seems to have become a porn site. -- Skaraoke (talk) 01:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed link to website 

message: There are conflicting birth dates and years on this article. Can someone research this? --EndlessDan 15:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  age 

message: Hi Missy Hyatt it's Denise wenhold long time no see how are you? Are you still in Tallahassee? I was going to come to town in a few weeks love to see you 2603:9001:5A00:2029:39F6:37B1:20B1:AC3F (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old friends 

message: She had Francine pose on it and Daffney and a few others.
Not very accurate at all to not even mention it.
I thought public figures weren't supposed to have control over what truths are said about them.on here 2600:1000:B02A:12BA:0:63:F9C6:6601 (talk) 23:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is her adult website not mentioned ?
Talk:Helioscope (studio)

message: The studio has changed its name to Helioscope, and so the content should be updated to reflect this and the page move. I'm reluctant to do it myself, as I have a loose WP:COI (I collaborate at times with Helioscope member/co-founder Steve Lieber.)  Could someone please handle this? --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: *Oregon Live 
*podcast interview
* a Forever Geek
--Nat Gertler (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some sources that could be used toward restoring the article
Template talk:Infobox chemical analysis

message: Inspired by Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Instruments/Templates/Infobox instrument; Template is a modified version of Template:Infobox camera.
A list of articles that would get this infobox:  Analytical_chemistry#Specific_Technologies_and_Instrumentation.
Comments and suggestions appreciated, thanks. --Kkmurray 18:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Link to proposed infobox: Infobox chemical analysis   --Kkmurray 02:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An infobox for chemical analysis techniques

message: Looks good. I'm a little concerned about the manufacturers section being a problem with companies trying to be included.--Nick Y. 18:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a question of whether the utility outweighs the spam-magnet aspect. I haven't really found the section very useful and there is a chronic problem with external link spam in the instrumentation pages (even more in biomedical instruments), so it wouldn't be much of a loss and it would take away the linkspam opportunity. --Kkmurray 20:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Please sync with the new sandbox, which splits the documentation to a separate doc page and tidies the code up a bit to match the style which has prevailed since this template was last modified (in early 2008). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sync with sandbox
Talk:Cornelia li Britannia

message: Feel free to make it better. --Monstez 18:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of article

message: I've never seen any hint that she is actually alive. Only other from the fact that her Knight is waiting for her return. Is that enough?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiquidSnakeEater (talk • contribs) 08:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Cornelia really alive?
Talk:Murder of Suesan and Sheila Knorr

message: Both Suesan Knorr and Sheila Knorr were victims of their mother's abuse and died in her hands. Sheila should not be neglected to mention, by only having an article on Suesan. Please help improve this article by adding more information on Sheila.--Sugarcubez 18:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Snowball (disambiguation)

message: How come no one mentioned the Cartoon Cat? Rattner2 (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snowball - The Simpsons? 

message: There is a cake called a snowball which has dessicated coconut around a marshmallow-like filling  - this could go here. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 00:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cake called a snowball
Talk:Meteorology/Books

message: There is a large body of books on meteorology (general, dynamics, cloud physics). this kind of list would be more appropriate in articles about subdiscipline. For example in article about atmospheric thermodynamics one can discuss books on such topics. As such this list is mostly out of context. Pcirrus 19:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm pretty sure this subpage should be merged with main article under WP:SP Disallowed Uses (3). Deditos 12:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be merged too, but I do appreciate the argument against merging, which is that this practice would decouple reference lists from the parent article and so be able to be used in multiple places. Not sure other Wikipedians would appreciate that enterprise-architect-style of thinking though. Donama (talk) 01:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with main article
Talk:Chris Core

message: Aside from his early career, there doesn't appear to be a list of Chris's jobs.  I would like to put back the WDCW job ("Weekend News With Chris Core") but I don't know when that job ended.
Shamino (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadcast history
Talk:Brig "Mercury" Attacked by Two Turkish Ships

message: Where is this painting? Seems wrong to have an article about it without saying where it is (physically).
:It is on exhibit at the Aivazovsky Museum in his native town of Theodosia. A companion piece, depicting the meeting of the Mercury with the Russian fleet, is in the Russian Museum, St. Petersburg. --Ghirla-трёп- 19:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge

message: I've put several references in, but I don't think I got the format quite correct, e.g.
 [www.website.com/link-goes-here.html TITLE OF THE LINK GOES HERE] accessed 10 August 2007
Is that correct?
Also, what happens if a reference is repeated? If you go to the references section you'll see some references have been added more than once. Is that okay?<Br />
Rfwoolf 13:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank-you to Wizzy for helping me out on a lot of this. Rfwoolf 16:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References, but reference format probably incorrect 

message: *I'm working on getting a photograph. I know there is one on the Government Communication Service's website on her profile, but I've emailed them to ask on the copyright status of the photo, and, if they can release any other photos.
*Her history in government goes back several years, and her current profile doesn't actual represent much of it. For example she was almost fired 2-years ago. She was one of the first Ministers to publicly take an HIV/AIDS test, and she reportedly invited the president to do the same (I think that's what almost got her fired the first time round) -- this nonetheless earned her major kudos in South Africa because at the time the president and her boss had highly controversial views on HIV/AIDS, and the department lacked leadership in this regard, so she was lauded back then. She is one of very few (or the only) person(s) in cabinet to be in an inter-racial marriage (her husband is caucasian (read: white) and she is african (read: black)). She also claims to be studying philosophy.
Rfwoolf 16:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the whoswhosa site lists an email address for her (eek!!) - perhaps just mail here for a photo ?? Wizzy…☎ 16:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other issues
Talk:John Milton Brannan

message: Brannan’s wife was not murdered in Staten Island; she left Brannan and fled the country for Europe without notice in 1858, leading to the conclusion she had committed suicide or been killed. She later remarried (while still legally married to Brannan) Captain Powell T. Wyman of the US Army, ca. 1860, who was killed at Glendale in 1862. Brannan was made aware of this affair and successfully sued for divorce.
I will note and source this when I have time. Radar488 (talk) 04:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eliza Crane Brannan 

message: Good afternoon, 
I opened this thread because there seems to be disagreement on this page and I'm not interested in an edit war.
I have added contemporary sources related to Brannan's service history during the 1877 railroad strike, all of which indicate he was stationed briefly in Philadelphia, PA. Another editor of this page states that Brannan was not in Philadelphia, but in Scranton, PA. I do not know if Brannan was ever stationed in Scranton, PA, during this time, though I have not seen anything to indicate that he was. All my documentation, however, supports the conclusion that he was in Philadelphia.
Thanks. Radar488 (talk) 22:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the events of July/August 1877
Talk:Sphinginae

message: I created the page today and it took me about an hour. If you see any mistakes, please fix them. The common names of the species, if applicable, should be entered in parenthesis aside the binomial name. Feel free to create any pages for a genus or a certain species as Project Lepidoptera needs all the help they can get! Thanks for any help!!! Taxidermistjake 00:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Superman: Speeding Bullets

message: Is it my eyesight or is that Batman on the Superman cover ?  RASAM (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you take a closer look, you'll notice the bat symbol is in the shape of Superman's crest. Also, you'll notice Batman has a full mask on and he's flying. 64.241.230.3 (talk) 19:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hi-De-Ho (1947 film)

message: The movie is often spelled Hi-De-Ho since it looks that way on the cover but in the movie, the title is shown as Hi De Ho. panda 19:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The description currently lists both spellings.  Deanlaw (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie title
Category talk:Anti-pornography activists

message: At separate times, there's been disagreement over whether or not to include the higher-level categories :Category:Women's rights activists and :Category:Conservatism by issue. The category in question, :Category:Anti-pornography activists, is split between radical feminists and far-right conservatives, in a ratio of slightly more than 1 to 2.
I think that neither category is appropriate, certainly not "Women's rights activists" because they are not even half the category, but not "Conservatism by issue" either because anti-conservatives make up between one-third and one-half of category members. Other users believe that when some members belong in a higher-level category, that category can be added.
Should either category be included? If so, which?
Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: But are the members of anti-porn pertinent? Not really. Reliable sources consider the topic of anti-porn an issue for conservatives. And I think you'll agree anti-porn is a topic of interest to feminists. A reader browsing Conservatism-by issue would expect to find anti-porn, and likewise for women's-rights-activists. Inclusion in both parent cats is appropriate. Lionel (talk) 23:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Anti-porn would certainly work in a conservatism template, but as I said, there are too many anti-conservatives in the category for it to belong. When you add a higher-level category, you are adding the subcat's members to that higher-level cat. Why would the category members not be pertinent? See WP:SUBCAT: "When making one category a subcategory of another, ensure that the members of the first really can be expected (with possibly a few exceptions) to belong to the second also." There are far too many exceptions - as I said, more than a third of the category members aren't conservatives, and more than half aren't women's rights activists. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial categories
Talk:Quilters (musical)

message: I stage managed a production in Southern California a million years ago and was interested in whatever became of the show. Particularly, I was curious about the rental quilt that arrived for the production. I figured that there are more than one of course, but where did they come from, etc? We had a 99 seat theatre with full house for a 3 month run. It was a money-maker for us, but I thought the show dragged.
Blondesareeasy (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Just Two Cents
Talk:Cap-Chat

message: Since Eole in german Wikipedia is described inside the article: "Le Nordais", there has been some fight about the height of this VAWT and to the added reference to his (Eole maskulin goddes of winds, ancient history Greece) Data. The height problem is solved, some time ago someone did not want to accept, that the height of Eole meant the complete height including Machinehouse and wanted to introduce only the original 86m Rotor-Height. Now this person is insisting on keeping references to a polemic website containing superfluo comments about VAWT tecnique wich unfortunately contains very reliable data concerning "Eole" too. The article is plastered with references to this page on a very disgusting purpose. 
This problem is of course difficould to resolve: I don´t like to accept the reference to this webpage http://www.ifb.uni-stuttgart.de/~doerner/Darrieus.html because it mentions H-Darrieus-Rotortechnique as sort of out of time 
(Moderner Saurier der Windenergienutzung
Das H-Darrieus-Gerät - it means in english - modern saurier in application of windenergy, the H-Darrieus-Rotor)
All the content in this mentioned webpage was written by german scientist Doerner. In my opinion a scientist should well keep his comments reserved for scientific documentation, but sometimes scientistst obey to personal inclination to points of view not particularely connected with neutral observation. In any case I would be very pleased, if I could find a neutral reference to a complete technical datasheet for Eole. I tried with google but failed to get satisfactory contents. In case someone can be helpful in this question, please leave a notice here. Hoping my english will do, greetings, --Kalinco (talk) 06:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eole 
Talk:Restigouche-class destroyer

message: ===St. Laurent class destroyer and Restigouche class destroyer===
Thanks for helping with the St Laurent and Restigouche destroyer pages.  What is the source for your statement that the Restigouches were lengthened at IRE?
I know that  gives a length of 371 ft after IRE and 366 ft as built.  But as built the ships were 366 ft on the waterline, and 371 ft overall, so the most likely explanation of the statement in that website is that whoever wrote it, saw different lengths quoted and misunderstood.
But if you have a good source for their being lengthened, what is it?--Toddy1 20:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source on Information posted by [[User talk:216.83.2.194| User:216.83.2.194]]

message: Thanks for helping with the St Laurent and Restigouche destroyer pages.  What is the source for your statement that the Restigouches were lengthened at IRE?
I know that  gives a length of 371 ft after IRE and 366 ft as built.  But as built the ships were 366 ft on the waterline, and 371 ft overall, so the most likely explanation of the statement in that website is that whoever wrote it, saw different lengths quoted and misunderstood.
But if you have a good source for their being lengthened, what is it?--Toddy1 20:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[St. Laurent class destroyer]] and [[Restigouche class destroyer]]

message: The infobox needs managing into a smaller size, the multiple configurations of weapons gives it bulk and makes for hard reading.GraemeLeggett (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: The forward section of the deck is unusual.  There's a breakwater set halfway forward from the bridge superstructure, and before that there is little that is similar to other warships.
Is there any truth in what I heard a few years ago that ships of this class had this done to better enable some compartments to be deliberately flooded to put that part under water, presumably to facilitate a part of nuclear fallout control. 2602:304:AE27:A99:9984:91CA:7F9B:B966 (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forward deck
Talk:Roger C. Weightman

message: did jefferson actually spell control 'controul'? if do, a 'sic' is in order. or is it a typo here?Toyokuni3 (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jefferson's letter

message: I'm posting despite the third edit conflict notice within fifteen minutes. Though the library is closed, so I cannot confirm, I want to note that I believe he worked first with the Washington Bank then the Washington branch of the Second Bank of the United States, which was involved in a scandal, possibly before his involvement. He also was involved in a controversy with Thomas Swann (attorney) whose page I just put up despite minimal or conflicting biographies, in his case quite likely because of his son's involvement with the B&O Railroad.Jweaver28 (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More work needed
MediaWiki talk:Userjspreview

message: Please change the message to something like
You are testing your user JavaScript right on this page. Remember it has not yet been saved!
Reasons:
* There is no actual "previewing" on JS and CSS files anymore
* Currently it's not clear that the file is actually executed on preview
* Help:User style would explain the purpose of this page for new users
Same goes for MediaWiki:Usercsspreview
∴ Alex Smotrov 20:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm... agree, the current message isn't as clear as it could be. Any objections or proposed alternatives? – Luna Santin (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem too controversial.  I went ahead and made the slight wording change.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Testing, no previewing
Wikipedia talk:Many things to many people

message: This essay started out as part of the FA candidacy discussion for Introduction to general relativity, in which several participants had expressed strong objections-in-principle to a mere "Introduction to" article aspiring to Featured Article status.  Many thanks to those editors who encouraged me to turn the text into the essay it has now become.
While everyone is, of course, welcome to contribute, it would certainly be counterproductive to continue the discussion in the form of an edit-war over this essay; rather, if you feel that Wikipedia should instead have one fixed target audience and contain articles only at an appropriate level for that audience (so that "Introduction to" articles become superfluous), you should consider starting your own essay setting forth that point of view.  --Markus Poessel 06:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About this essay
Talk:Social effects of United States military forces based in the United Kingdom

message: I recommend this article be deleted and its content subsumed into United Kingdom. In anticipation of agreement to this "no brainer" I have pasted all the content to United Kingdom#American armed forces. If I can remember how to do the rfd, I will. Abtract 20:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed all the badly written and uncited opinion and comment. If this articel is worth keeping it need to be written in encyclopedic style with some good references etc. Abtract 22:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start again
Talk:Indian Council of Historical Research

message: Rather a piece of Hindu nationalist propaganda than an encyclopedia article. Marriex (talk) 07:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I see you are working on this, I found these but am not sure if they are all relevant to the Institute or personel or are all RS.  Doug Weller talk 17:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Likely very useful, thank you. I got a bit discouraged after seeing the page would essentially have to be build from scratch; there's essentially no well-sourced information in it. So I've contented myself to removing all the puffery for now, and may return to build the page in a little while. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Also{an OUP book) and maybe  Doug Weller talk 18:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are any of these useful?
Talk:American Aviation Historical Society

message: How does this fit this project?  --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:53, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museums 

message: *  The AAHS Journal is currently glossy, but has not always been.  It started out as a stapled set of individual pages, and took quite a while to become a glossy.
*  The Society was not in Huntingdon Beach for all its time prior to 2017.  It was originally headquartered in Ojai. 
*  What is the basis for articles being "peer reviewed", which is usually taken in the academic sense.  I know articles are subject to review after publication, but this usually is taken to mean review prior to publication.
: Not making changes, because I have no RS, but I have been a member since 1963 and have a long memory.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:Louis L. Redding

message: Potential sources to develop this content:
*http://www.aaregistry.com/african_american_history/2214/Louis_Redding_a_Delaware_legend
*http://www.hsd.org/DHE/DHE_who_redding.htm
*http://www.answers.com/topic/louis-l-redding
*http://siris-artinventories.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?uri=full=3100001~!320180!0&term=
*http://www.udel.edu/BlackHistory/diamonds.html
*http://www.udel.edu/PR/Messenger/99/2/louis.html
*http://www.udel.edu/reslife/explore_housing/eastcampus  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamuspsu (talk • contribs) 19:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled