lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CHILL

message: Separated the discussion of CHILL language, CHILL compiler and CHILL standard.  Corrected some English. Rhmccullough (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

message: is that some kind of (bad) joke? --Lasse Hillerøe Petersen (talk) 12:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influenced by COBOL?
Talk:Pyotr Valuyev

message: Should this article be moved to Pyotr Valuyev, according to Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian?  Valuyevsky Ukaz should also be consistent with this spelling (see talk:Valuyevsky Ukaz regarding naming) —Michael Z. 2006-11-19 17:14 Z
:I think you have a point. --Ghirla -трёп- 10:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Singapore Chinese Orchestra

message: Sadly, this is start class, although it deserves nothing more. - SpLoT (*T* C+u+g+v) 15:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Please merge relevant content, if any, from [ Singapore Youth Chinese Orchestra] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Youth Chinese Orchestra.   (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.)  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 09:05Z
By the way, I have to note that Mr Yeo Puay Hian, our former conductor for Raffles Institution Chinese Orchestra died of cancer last year.  I'm removing his name.  YseraOfDreams (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Singapore Youth Chinese Orchestra]] 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sco.com.sg/files/zip/Season_brochure_CONTENTS.pdf http://sco.com.sg/english/orchestra/3012.html http://sco.com.sg/english/orchestra/3013.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I have made substantial edits to this page in order to remove advertisement-like text, and to make a more neutral point of view. 
I have also removed lists of non-notable musicians, committee members and teachers, as this is non-notable content for an orchestra’s page. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Also part of my last edit was to remove unsourced biographies of three musicians, which had zero sources. If anyone wishes to rescue this content with sources, it might be better as a separate artist page, but I can’t find any secondary sources to indicate notability. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial edits
Talk:Reading program

message: I don't see the point of this page. Do people actually search on "Reading program"? That seems like a search that would learn nowhere because of the lack of specificity. Why do we even need this page? – Chris53516 (Talk) 16:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are looking for a reading computer program then both 'reading program' and 'reading software' are plausible search terms. Howver, I agree that rationalisation is needed. I have therefore merged the s/w into List of educational software and the Time program is now linked from Reading (activity). BlueValour 18:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Don't look at me, I didn't start it as a dab page - Reading Program was a redirect I put on RfD, after the debacle of someone renaming the Accelerated Reader article, it got changed to a dab page.... I moved the page for proper capitalization, tried to build it up a little bit more, but if you want to nominate it on AfD, feel free. I agree that the search terms seem way too vague to be helpful. --JohnDBuell 18:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, I'll go with this - I probably would have left well enough alone had I correctly seen BlueValour's comments, which for some reason didn't get displayed, and in fact got clobbered. Hopefully that was just a little database hiccup - I should have seen an Edit Conflict message. Sorry about all that. --JohnDBuell 19:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of page
Talk:José Chávez y Chávez

message: I have noticed that user FiddleStix1217 added an "enhanced" picture to this and many other biographies (see e.g. the contributions of this IP and those of the user in general). While technically stunning, I doubt these picture make sense for Wikipedia: it was probably enhanced starting from the corresponding file on Wikimedia Commons, which is based on his mugshot (here seen complete in an external link). 
I found another picture of him on Facebook, and if you compare the three of them, you can see that the beard shown in the enhanced picture is either non recognizable (in the original mugshot that was also on Commons) or darker and different from the one on the FB picture (assuming that it was even shot at the same moment, since the coat looks considerably darker - maybe it's just a different camera?).
In general, photo-enhancing techniques based on neural networks create good-looking pictures but can insert details that, while overall likely, are not present in the original picture (due to the original media resolution not capturing them, but also not present in the original subject at all). I suspect these pictures are either out of place for Wikipedia and more suited for a Netflix documentary or a popular science magazine, or should come with a big warning that the wonderful details are interpretation of an AI (for some context on the implications of this, see for example this article).
--2A02:58:14F:CB00:5532:5D33:BF8C:8C02 (talk) 12:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enhanced photo
Talk:Boat Quay

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books/about/Singapore_s_100_Historical_Places.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Meme hack

message: You gotta article on Adbusters and all that. AtG has a posse/OBEY Giant. Reality hacking and yippies. The Merry whateverthey'recalled. Schwa.
This is notable on the same grounds... --207.216.10.77 17:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Unless someone cares to supply examples of 'meme hacks' used outside the realm of advertising and corporate identity, it is suggested that this be merged into a subsection on subvertising, and the relevant categories and stub tags be copied over. dr.ef.tymac 17:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable, but proposed merge 

message: The article doesn't cite external sources, & the alleged examples are just puzzling.  There is no explanation of what makes Social Darwinism, Christian vegetarianism or the Muhammad cartoons a "meme hack".  To stand as examples, these need reference to an external source identifying them as meme hacks.  Otherwise they're just unsubstantiated OR.   21:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No reply after two weeks, so I've removed these confusing, unsourced, interpretive examples.   19:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 
Talk:Singapore Cruise Centre

message: In my opinion, Singapore Cruise Centre should be referring to the management company that managing the 3 cruise centre, while the title for this article should be Singapore Cruise Centre@HarbourFront? Although most people will be more familiar with the name Singapore Cruise Centre as Singapore Cruise Centre@HarbourFront. Any comments?
Zuff (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Singapore Flyer

message: Does this article really need two almost identical photos (:Image:SingaporeFlyerNDP 2007Preview.JPG and :Image:Singapore Flyer NDP2007.JPG? And do the originals have to be that big (1.42MB and 1.28MB)? Michael Bednarek 07:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two almost identical photos? 

message: The first image in the article has about 28 capsules while in the second image in the article has about only 8 capsules?
:Second image -- probably before the flyer was completed. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Different structures? 
Talk:Yield surface

message: I'm not skilled at writing articles. I'm sure that the pictures and their captions can be placed better, I just don't know how to do it better than it currently is. Please make it better if you can :)
Janek Kozicki 17:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I couldn't find in the literature if the formula for Bresler - Pister yield surface is correct. But using this formula, I was able to plot the surfaces, and I added the images of this surface. Someone please verify this if you can. Janek Kozicki (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Hi, I believe there is a mistake in the equation for the Drucker-Prager yield surface. At present the equation contains the following:
(m-1)/2 and (m+1)/2 
Based on the definitions given on the main page for the Drucker Prager yield criterion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drucker%E2%80%93Prager_yield_criterion), I believe the coefficients should be
(m-1)/2m and (m+1)/2m.
Can somebody please check and confirm.
Enenen10 (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential mistake in Drucker Prager equation
Talk:Fossil Fuel: The XTC Singles 1977–92

message: My preference is for chronologies to include compilations, especially in the case of XTC, whose album output contained less than they actually recorded at the time.
I would also included the The Dukes of Stratosphear album(s) as a chronology 2.
--Fantailfan 17:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography Chronology - comments 
Talk:South Bridge Road

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Toponymics – A Study of Singapore Street Names. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 12:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Naval Facility Bermuda

message: As someone who has been in this building and had to be relocated in 1992 to NAS Bermuda because of the closing, I know it wasn't called USN Tudor Hill and it wasn't closed in 1995.  I have linked NAVFAC Bermuda's own webpage to the article as evidence. I think all the military of bermuda articles should be titled to reflect the names of the bases how they were. --JAYMEDINC 17:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please take to WP:RM and go through proper procedure. -Patstuarttalk|edits 00:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 15:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: JAYMEDINC was correct. Naval Facility Bermuda was an operational SOSUS shore terminus and its mission was classified until 1991. The Tudor Hill Laboratory was entirely separate as far as command, management and function (research, particularly acoustic) but was associated in that it was the only Navy laboratory on the Atlantic with access to an operational SOSUS system. It's mission was not as tightly held, there were visiting scientists and publicized projects. It appears that it worked fairly well as a cover locally for the more secretive Naval Facility and that appears to be the case in local articles still on line. There is enough open literature to possibly make a Tudor Hill Laboratory article. 71.178.17.34 (talk) 16:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name cleanup
Talk:South Coast derby

message: --
I made a major overhaul to this article, as before my update the article included various grammatical errors as well as error in diction and syntax. It also had an issue with point of view, which I have since worked to rectify. I'll try and take the time to cite sources and continue to work to clarify portions of the article when I have the time Riskbreaker2987 06:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Recently, someone claimed that Southampton fans refer to Portsmouth fans as 'scummers', just as Pompey fans call Saints fans, and changed the article to that effect. As a Southampton man myself, I've never heard of this - we call them 'Skates', they call us 'Scummers'. I've reverted the change - can people confirm that I'm correct to do so, or is there something about the South Coast Rivalry that I've completely misunderstood? Chris Larkin 17:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scummers

message: Can anyone verify the thing about scum on the water? Seems like another retcon to me... Dan Kerins 11:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nicknames

message: The article currently says "Some ascribe the growing rivalry since then to the cities' diverging economic fortunes, which included the transfer to Portsmouth of cross-Channel ferry services once based in Southampton." which makes it sound like Portsmouth is economically more successful than Southampton.  The latest Gross Value added figures has Southampton producing £4.2 billion per year (£18,400 per person), Portsmouth producing £3.4 billion (£17,800).  Granted this gap is less than in the early 90s but wouldn't that be converging economic fortunes? DM Andy 08:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Slow reaction from me, but you've made a good point. Anyone else have any other thoughts? As other bits of this article, this seems to be based upon rumour rather than fact. Dan K (talk) 22:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm In practice its uncleaer if there is any reason for the rivalry other than lack of alternatives.©Geni (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Economy

message: I notice nothing here about Portsmouth parading the FA Cup round the Dell in 1939.  So no rivalary then.  Also during WW2 The Dell was bombed, and 'Home' games played at Fratton Park.  Maybe worth a mention?.  As regards scummers, and skates. I refer you the the song that starts 'When I was a little boy.......  this song refers to Pompey Scum.  I remember it being sung at The Dell in the late 60's.  Not sure if this helps?Bettybutt (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  South coast rivals.
Talk:Chubby Hubby

message: I'd like to make a Chinese translation to create a page on Chinese Wikipedia. Anyone care to help? Leave a msg on my talk page. Thanks!--达伟 (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Wikipedia 

message: How is the note of digital manipulation relevant in this biographical article? Is the same digital manipulation (re-touching, color enhancement etc) mentioned when discussing news websites?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.75.52.174 (talk) 01:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of information 
Category talk:French composers

message: There are way too many composers on this page. If someone has the time, they should seperate the composers into two categories: well known and less well known composers. If you click on some of these composers, they are completely secondary, they have no works you can find recordings (much less scores) of, and really are of no interest or use. Some one who wants to listen to French composers would find this page more frustrating than helpful.
This suggestion seems reasonable on first reading - but: might one not ask well-known or less well-known to whom? Getting agreement on which is which would probably result in non-stop arguments!
So - may I suggest an alternative: why not divide up French composers according to date of birth (or - indeed of death)? In that way, there can at least be a minimum of quibbling! Hair Commodore (talk) 12:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Heter iska

message: I am planning in the next few day on creating a new article Usury in Jewish Law and merging this article in to the new one.  I think that this topic is hard to present alone and needs greater context.  The hebrew wikipedia seems to lump all of the laws for ריבית in he:היתר עסקה which I don't think is a good idea.  Any objections? Jon513 17:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please reconsider. The reason why it would be good to keep this article under its present title would be to generate traffic from google. Heter Iska was searched for 80 times in Yahoo last month, so it would probebly be a few hundred times (google dont disclose). I would love to contrbte to the new article, but it need not me merged. Chavatshimshon 00:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generating more traffic is not a factor in naming articles.  In any event I don't think that it would matter since heter iska would redirect to the new article.  Jon513 11:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actualy not, the article will not feature high in the search ranking if the title does not include the searched term. It can depend on incoming links actualy, but its doubtful we will recieve as many links for the new article as the term 'heter iska'. By the way it is a factor somewhat. But we'll see as we progress. Chavatshimshon 18:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Usury in Jewish Law
Talk:Congregation of Holy Cross

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :CatholicMom.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7#CatholicMom.com until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "CatholicMom.com" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Change of meaning in the introduction? 2603:8001:2600:E50A:602E:EC6B:FB2D:E0DF (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely sure what you mean by your question, but "pontifical right" is correct in the intro. "Right" refers to the kind of independence and oversight the organization has rather than to the form of religious ceremonies they use, "rites". Jahaza (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ..."rites" instead of "rights"?
Talk:USS Knox (FF-1052)

message: Scuttlebutt around the fleet in the mid 1970s was that  the USS Knox had a problem with her hull seams splitting and leaking due to having been used in a test for the ability of a surface ship to adequately survive the close-by shock of a nuclear depth charge. Supposedly, the blast "loosened her seams" leading to small leaks when the ship ran into rough seas such as those occuring during a storm. Perhaps someone who served aboard the Knox can verify this.Obbop 17:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2006 

message: I served aboard Knox. I've been in nearly all spaces accessible. I've been above and below her. I've seen her hull stripped of all paint. I saw no evidence of the rumor. Knox has survived typhoons that were strong enough to tear fire plugs from the deck. No leaks. She did suffer from a thin hull from spending more time at sea than any of the other 1052's.Ajabber64 (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaky Knox Denied 

message: We have two mentions about Nuclear weapons -on this relatively short page- and each directly mentions a specific service menber providing the mention. It it public knowledge that ASROC was a nuclear capable weapon. Specific mention of such was not authorized in the Cold War - all were told to provide the generic unclassified statement of "I can neither confirm nor deny the presence of Nuclear Weapons aboard the USS X" - This information is not relevant to the article, and should be removed. Wfoj3 (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear Weapons  

message: On this page and the USS MONTGOMERY page there is a reference to a 76mm/3" that was removed in the 1970s. I can find no other reference to this gun and it is not visible in any pictures I've seen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5C5:C100:F78:B8EA:21E0:C44C:1AA9 (talk) 02:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  76MM 

message: These ships (the Knox-class as a whole) spent more than half their service lives designated as Frigates, not destroyer escorts. Why are they labeled destroyers? That seems confusing to me as when I opened the article I expected to see them labeled as frigates. Should this be changed? Ian.vanharper (talk) 18:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I will even add, it's designation on the page is listed as FF-1052. I feel it should be changed, but I will wait 14 days for a response before I take to editing to heading. Ian.vanharper (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a destroyer?