lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Archbald Pothole State Park

message: In UK English usage, a pothole is not a hole worn by flowing water (as stated in the article) but a vertical shaft extending from a cave formed by chemical erosion (e.g. Gaping Ghyll, many of whose surface entrances have the suffix "Pot" signifying "Pothole"). Fluvial erosional features of this magnitude are not found in the UK as there were no large ice-dammed lakes in the UK during the last glaciation; I assume (from the description in the text)that this feature arose during the draining of one of the lakes dammed by the Laurentide glaciers. I presume that the article reflects common US usage, but it may be as well to have the distinction made. --APRCooper 21:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of term "Pothole" 

message: I added more information on the 1997 and 2002 renovations, as well as the ongoing litter and "men seeking sex" problems. I found another source (the NY Times), incoroporated much more information from the AP article that appeared in the Amarillo TX  newspaper, but dropped the Electric City "best place to catch an STD" award as a) it seemed to me to be questionable as a WP:RS and b) it did not actually say the men were looking for homosexual sex (which seemed to be what it was being used for as a ref). Given the POV possibilities here, it is probably best to discuss changes here before making them in the article itself. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 16:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is much more encyclopedic now, nice work.  VerruckteDan (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History update
Talk:Don (2007 film)

message: Can we add a note and link:
Not to be confused with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_(2006_Hindi_film)
The Hindi film was much, much bigger with international release, etc. 51.148.133.36 (talk) 11:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . Politrukki (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar movie
Talk:Old Khottabych

message: The name Starik Khottabych, Old Man Khottabych and Old Hottabych (as on DVD cover) are of the same meaning and does not probably matter. At least USA name is The Flying Carpet. End of story. --Yuriy Lapitskiy 09:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name issue 

message: Given that the book is over half a century older than Harry Potter, that statement looks weird at least.  -- Paul Pogonyshev (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and where did you see anti-capitalist elements in the novel, please indicate them better Цйфыву (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: but I didn't see them there Цйфыву (talk) 09:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  kind of modern Harry Potter novel for Soviet kids 

message: Name is derived from Arabic Khattab with Russian -ych diminutive suffix.
In fact, the suffix -ych is not diminutive. It is used here to form a patronymic name. Volka called the genie this way because his father's name was Khattab and because in Russia you may informally address older people by patronymic name alone (while formally you would use both first and patronymic name). 85.237.41.146 (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffix -ych
Talk:Fool & Final

message: Shouldn't the title be Fool N Final, as that is how it is in the movie?
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Fred Claus

message: Call me a cynic, but I'm inclined to believe the snippet in the Trivia section about the bicycles is nothing more than an advertisement added by the owners of that shop. As such I'm going to remove it. If you feel it has merit please discuss here. - Throw 09:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising?

message: Will Fred Claus be in IMAX? -Oscar22 07:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fred Claus in IMAX?

message: This article needs to be updated. The movie's already out. --Gp75motorsports 14:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: *Fred Claus: Putting Christmas in Jeopardy With VFX —Erik (talk • contrib) - 05:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual effects 

message: The budget needs to be removed. When Variety first announced this project, it was reported that Vaughn would receive $20 million. No way is that $30 million budget figure accurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.65.201 (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: I rewrote this article after looking into quite a bit of vandalism lately.  Since even the recent reverts had missed some parts, it was easier to start from scratch.  All info should at this point be correct, but there will need to be review to make sure nothing important was left out. Chills42 (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Ok, 1) inarguably, the plot summary is too long. My only problem is, it's probably (hopefully) an enthusiastic kid who wrote it. Im hesitant to delete the whole thing because it clearly took a lot of work. I dont know much about how Wikipedia works. If you erase it, is it gone forever? As much as it is overlong, Im not thrilled to see that happen. 2) Can someone report on how it did in Box Office standings in the US the first weekend? It has the amount of money made, but not if it won the weekend or came close. Between listing the UK DVD release date and the UK opening weekend finish, this article has an innappropriate Brit tilt to it-SF
:I second the criticism of the novel-length treatment in the plot summary section. I have seen the movie and would be more than happy to hazard a summary, but I don't want to step on any toes without going through the proper channels. Chalkieperfect (talk) 04:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Questions 

message: I've seen the new Warner Bros. logo in Fred Claus! --ItsWBShield (talk) 07:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Warner Bros. Logo 

message: In an article that was mostly about Wedding Crashers the director David Dobkin expressed his disappointment saying: "Instead, I made Fred Claus [starring Vaughn], which was a PG-13 movie originally and turned into a PG film. That’s not my gig, man. We got caught in all kinds of poor decisions, and that movie didn’t come out the way I wanted it to." I guess maybe that could go in the Critical response section but I'm not sure. -- 109.76.149.139 (talk) 03:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment from the director
Talk:Largest-scale trends in evolution/Archive 1

message: Regarding http://cogprints.org/1799/ -- I am the author of this. --Pdturney 14:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: This essay falls under WP:OR as the statement by the author above indicates. If it survives, the content should be merged with Evolutionary progress (which also has the same OR problem) and the combined content merged into the Evolution article. Vsmith 14:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement by the author above does not indicate that there is any original research in this essay. I believe that there is no original research in this essay. Please point to specific claims that you believe are original research. --Pdturney 14:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a kid with a website at geocities.  It's not original research because it's based on published sources: the ones listed and Turney (2000).  Turney (2000) definitely needs to be cited where appropriate.  The article at present tends to state its arguments as if they are universally accepted and I suspect there may be some who would argue agains them (such as Gould).  The best approach would be to add qualifiers along the lines of "Turney (2000) argues that..."  --Aranae 17:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the vote of confidence. I don't think anything I've said would offend Gould (if he were still alive). I'm trying to be neutral about whether there are large-scale trends. So far, nothing I've written here is based on any original claims in Turney (2000). Please tell me specifically which claims require citations. --Pdturney 18:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR & merge
Talk:Haijby scandal

message: The Haijby affair did not really involve the king himself. The affair was about how the authorities treated Haijby.83.248.25.135 16:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I realise I'm replying to a 13 year old comment, but I have moved the article because I think the word "affär" does not translate fully to "affair" in English. It has a much more political meaning in Swedish, whereas the English word is mostly about extramarital affairs. EditorInTheRye (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any evidence that "most Gestapo prisoners" were tortured? This sounds like anti-German propagandaRoyalcourtier (talk) 01:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gestapo torture 
Talk:Spinal lock

message: How does ligament damage result in stroke??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.121.70 (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of stroke 

message: all these careful wording and still most people cant really picture the move in their heads, why dont we add a picture to each paragraph?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.103.97.25 (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Founder

message: I was unsure whether the reason for the clean-up tag was for the minor changes I've made or something bgger. I've removed the tag, but if anyone feels it needs more, please edit it or re-tag it and put the reasons on here. Thanks, Boleyn2 (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Tag removal) 

message: I added the abbrev. (Fod.) and I changed the order of definitions to elevate 'Founding Fathers' to third. - Brad Watson, Miami (talk) 14:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder (Fod.) & 3rd def. 'Founding Fathers' 

message: Md Ataur Rahman is a Bangladeshi entrepreneur and computer programmer who founded University Road, Admission Portal, ICDI.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Safiy80 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Md Ataur Rahman
Talk:IRT Ninth Avenue Line

message: :It seems notable that this "elevated" went through a tunnel (due to the topology) and had subway-like partly-underground stations. As for the opening of this section,  says "and was extended to meet the Jerome Ave. IRT in 1918"Jason McHuff 23:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The first 1868 version was a cable hauled railways between two stations - a railways line, elevated but like many others and not a metro. It became the world's second urban metro in 1972, after the 1863 Metropolitan Railway in London, when more stations were added to the two station line. Metros do not have to be underground.  94.3.125.209 (talk) 10:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: A metro only from 1872

message: What was the original track gauge? Peter Horn User talk 17:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original track gauge 

message: The phrase "changed the wheel widths on the rolling stock" makes no sense and should read ""changed the wheel spacing on the axles of the rolling stock". However the problem is that one can not change the spacing of the train wheels on an axle or on the wheel set. The wheels are mounted with a press fit at perhaps . So, as for moving the wheels on the axle, good luck. One changes the wheel sets or even the trucks. Peter Horn User talk 01:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure nonsense 

message: The text body states that the line opened on July 3rd, but the sidebar indicates it opened on July 1st.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elead1 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening day discrepancy
Talk:Dunedin cable tramway system

message: I've made what seem at first to be odd changes to some links, pointing them to redirects. The reason is simple - I am currently in the process of making a series of separate articles for Dunedin suburbs. The redirected links now point to the titles that these new articles will soon be at. Please leave them! Grutness...wha? 12:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to links 

message: What was the track gauge?? Peter Horn User talk 17:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 3' 6" Cape gauge. — Matthew25187 (talk) 06:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track gauge 

message: I think the steepest in the world statement, under Mornington, actually applies to the Maryhill Extension, so should be moved to that section. Also put Stuart St after Mornington as the last main route to open. And apply name Kaikorai to the Stuart St section. Nankai (talk) 04:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steepest
Talk:Best of the Best (1989 film)

message: Was this movie shown in theaters?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.163.205 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Direct to video, or no?

message: Seems kind of odd to omit which martial arts the tournament is concerned with. Since it is Korea, I'm guessing it is Tae Kwon Do, but guessing isn't a good thing to do with articles. --Gwern  (contribs) 16:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which art?

message: Having watched the film, and personally practicing Taekwonko, the writer of the original article seems largely correct in his comments that the sport/art is in fact, Taekwondo.
I'm not sure what sources or references would be applicable to suport this. A lot of the information given - for example, the use of Huogu (body protectors) being a relatively unique trait of WTF Taekwondo - is anecdotal, but accurate nonetheless (verifyable through virtually any credible observation of the sport). It's also worth noting that in the US, Taekwondo is often referred to as 'Korean Karate' and that the descriptions/labelling of the sport in the film may have been altered for convenience; i.e. for easier understanding/consumption by the target audience. There's also a scene in the final setting of the film where an American sports commentator at the ringside explains that the styles employed in the tournament involve a mix of Karate, Judo, Kickboxing and Taekwondo (IIRC), which would support the ambiguity observed in the original article that certain techniques [such as grappling, throws, punches to the face, and kicks to the legs] are in fact prohibited in WTF Taekwondo. 
Furthermore, with the 'events' portrayed in the film taking place circa 20 years ago, it's also worth noting that the sport (particularly in the competitive arena) practiced in the late eighties was very different to the sport practiced today.
One other thing - the article omits to mention Philip Rhee as a starring actor; only Eric Roberts and James Earl Jones are mentioned. I'm not making any changes to the article at this time as this is purely an observation; but in watching the film, Philip Rhee is certainly more than a supporting actor - as the cast is 'whittled down' in the subsequent sequels, his character (Tommy) is also the only one left...
Mike.Harrison 22:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Which art? 

message: I changed the plot description sentence from the original "The plot revolves around a team of American taekwondoin facing a team of Koreans in a taekwondo tournament.".  Since the American teamn were not all Tae Kwon Do practitioners, it would be better to state it that way. I also changed the description of the South Korean team.. While it could very well be assumed that all of the members of the South Korean team are TKD practitioners, it's just cleaner and consistent with the description of the American team, in general.
RayGhost
Use way as no way; Use limitation as no limitation (talk) 07:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified description of plot =
Talk:Galtymore

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
This mountain appears on Ordnance Survey Ireland maps as Galtymore Mountain. A Google search yields about 11,100 results for Galtymore and about 1,200 results for Galteemore. Timeineurope 12:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And about 259 for "Galtymore Mountain", the proposed title. This is clearly not the most common name. Irish mountains are notoriously variable in their spellings, and in a case like this where the OSi is so clearly outnumbered, I don't think the move would be wise. There is room for discussion between "Galtymore" and "Galteemore", but "Galtymore Mountain" can be ruled out. --Stemonitis 16:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well just as reference. Briticana uses the "Galtymore Mountain" spelling. I personally think we should use that spelling. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 19:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

text: If that's correct, then a move to Galtymore rather than "Galtymore Mountain" seems reasonable. The latter seems a rather artificial construction. zoney  ♣ talk 14:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 13:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2007 Requested move

message: Overhauled this article (as per MacGillycuddy's Reeks, Purple Mountain and Brandon Mountain articles).  Have merged the Galtee Mountains article with Galtymore.  Most of the topics, geology, naming, hill walking etc. are the same for both.  Ensure that we have at least one substantive article on the Galtees that has a better chance of being maintained in the future (the individual articles were more like stubs). Gave a full list of the 24 peaks with key details. Britishfinance (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhauled
Talk:Great Orme Tramway

message: It may well have been described as that, but it would seem to ignore the one and only fatal accident (not mentioned in this article) in 1932. Information here. Loganberry (Talk) 13:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that you add details of that accident to the article, and remove the bit about the 2000 accident being the most serious. Thryduulf (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the [2000] accident, described as the most serious since the opening in 1902" 

message: RAIB report has been published. Mjroots (talk) 11:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 accident

message: About this being «one of only three surviving in the world[citation needed].» Well, needed indeed! In Lisbon there are three independent street funiculars, albeit small and operated by the same company — the text mistakenly links to Trams in Lisbon instead of to Elevador da Glória, Elevador da Bica, and :pt:Elevador do Lavra. And there’s yet another street funicular system in Portugal: :pt:Funicular de Viseu, built already in the 21st century — I’m sure there must be many more worldwide. I suggest changing to «one of the few», which is undoubtly true, as 100 years ago there were many more of theses than today, recent ones notwithstanding. Tuvalkin (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of three? 

message: Does anyone know the details of the operation of this system? Does it operate seasonally, or year-round? Does it operate seven-days a week? What hours of the day does it run? And how often does it run during the day? Thanks in advance. --IJBall (talk) 03:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation?
Talk:Errigal

message: My father-in-law (a Donegal native) is quite adamant that there no "Mount" preceding the name and that it is simply "Errigal". Any comments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noonand  (talk • contribs) 10:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Moving the article from Mount Errigal to Errigal sounds good to me. If we do, it might be worth including a sentence to say that the variant "Mount Errigal" exists but is not used by locals (or officially?). Q·L·1968 ☿ 20:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

text: Hello Padraig1968, I personally agree that this article should be moved to simply Errigal. However, this Talk page may not be on many watchlists. Therefore, I suggest you ask the question at WikiProject Ireland, just to ensure a broader consensus. If agreed, the move itself would be easily done. Declangi (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  To "mount" or not? 

message: Created a redirect page from the Irish language name "An Earagail" to the Errigal article.
Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 21:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I removed this section as it looked like a copyright violation of this archived webpage. From what I can tell, the text was added with this edit in 2011. Interestingly, the same text occurs in  this press release from Donegal County Council (10th paragraph, Charles Sweeney quote) dating from July 2015. Declangi (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Hill walking section
Talk:Colonial High School

message: I deleted the following unsourced statement, " There has also been an increase of interest in the chorus and drama departments as well, with the CHS drama department earning recognition for their 2006 production of Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire.", because a citation had been requested for more than 3 months with no response. Per the verifiability policy, do not add the statement back into the article until it has been cited with reliable sources. -- Donald Albury 04:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced statement deleted

message: Should the athletics section mention their cross country team? They won the FHSAA 4A state championship this year over three-time defending champion Miami Columbus.
http://fl.milesplit.com/meets/101107/results/183160  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.100.120 (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross country?
Talk:Mullaghanish

message: Which mast is 152.4 metres tall? The old one or the new one? Is it planned to dismantle the old mast when the new mast took the service?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.139.117.61 (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height of masts - why two masts 

message: According to http://www.iaa.ie/safe_reg/iaip/Published%20Files/AIP%20Files/ENR/EI_ENR_5_4_EN.pdf the mast at Mullaghanish is still 500 ft ( 152.4 metres) high. Please give an official source of the new mast mention its height to 220 metres.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.180.161 (talk) 12:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height source for new mast 

message: According to RTENL's television frequences document here the ERP of the analogue TV channels on UHF are 375kW. Marno2121 (talk) 01:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  UHF analogue television ERP