lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National Assessment of Educational Progress

message: "it became increasingly more appeal" should be "it became increasingly more appealing"
re: History - Add your source as a link at the bottom.  Use additional sources. Caity57 (talk) 00:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy

message: The History section is a (somewhat garbled) paraphrase from the paper it cites, an acacemic history of the NAEP commissioned by the NAGB.  It can and should be improved.  But it puzzles me that a history of why there is an NAEP should be struck from the NAEP article. M.boli (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanking History Section 

message: The unsourced "darts" quote I just reverted came from this blog post at the Washington Post:
* 
The author was disagreeing with how NAEP sets the benchmarks, the threshold numbers used for declaring "proficient." Conceivably there is room in this article for a section on critiques. But from its placement, its lack of explanation, and its lack of context, this edit seems to be merely an attempt to insert an unflattering-sounding quote. M.boli (talk) 08:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced "darts" quote 

message: I just made a small edit, removing the phrase "is a trusted resource" from the line "NAEP is a trusted resource and has been providing valid and reliable data on student performance since 1969." The terms 'valid' and 'reliable' have technical definitions when applied to data that makes them more than simply matters of opinion, and I assume this statement is more than just a matter of opinion, however, calling NAEP 'trusted' without saying trusted by whom for what purpose makes the whole line sound more like a PR blurb than an informative statement. The simplest solution is to delete the phrase. It leaves open the question, however, of the objectivity of the rest of the line and the rest of the article. I don't have the time or inclination to edit the whole page for POV, but someone who cares about this page ought to review it. Baon (talk) 12:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV problem 

message: NAEP has undergone significant changes since this article was last up dated. Hopefully someone can bring it up to date from roughly 2012 to 2024. As a parent, you can decline to have your child take place in NAEP, but most school administrations will try to deny that option exists. Seki1949 (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is outdated
Talk:History of Eswatini

message: The recent history has been added to. However these are activities that occured in the 1980s and 1990s ( post Sobhuza era ). More still needs to be added such as the constitutional review commission and other events. A new section on the 2000s needs to be created as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludvonga (talk • contribs) 23:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent History
Talk:Ivan Briukhovetsky

message: Subtelny,'Ukraine',2005, page 147, would have Doroshenko invade the left bank and depose Briukhovetsky. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: deposition
Talk:Hypatia (journal)

message: Hypatia accepted one of the hoax papers for publication: "When the Joke Is on You: A Feminist Perspective on How Positionality Influences Satire". This argued that "academic hoaxes or other forms of satirical or ironic critique of social justice scholarship are unethical, characterized by ignorance and rooted in a desire to preserve privilege" ().
A second paper submitted to Hypatia, "The Progressive Stack: An Intersectional Feminist Approach to Pedagogy", was not accepted. It received three "revise and resubmit" reviews (). The Wall Street Journal described the second paper thus ():
According to the Wall Street Journal, Ann Garry, Hypatias interim editor, said she was "deeply disappointed". She continued: "Referees put in a great deal of time and effort to write meaningful reviews, and the idea that individuals would submit fraudulent academic material violates many ethical and academic norms. It is equally upsetting that the anonymous reviewer comments from that effort were shared with third parties, violating the confidentiality of the peer-review process" ().
SarahSV (talk) 01:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd add that Leiter was critical of Hypatia, but that Weinberg was exonerative, with quotes. In the full article, both had criticism of the hoaxers in some way, 'grievance studies' being an inflammatory/unhelpful framing (Leiter), and that the premise of the hoax papers not necessarily showing what they set out to show, although they could show issues with the standards for acceptance in those journals (Weinberg). Although those aren't the only criticism/praise of the hoaxers's efforts.Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, good idea. SarahSV (talk) 03:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax papers
Talk:American Journal of Bioethics

message: I propose that we eliminate, or at the very least consolidate and qualify, the currently substantial portion of the AJOB entry devoted to impact factors. I will highlight briefly three reasons.
1. Other journals with exponentially greater size and reach do not devote nearly this much copy to impact factors. Nature: 30 words, Science: 12 words, AJOB: 68 words.
2. The value of impact factors is hotly debated.
3. The impetus for including so much on impact factors in this article may be self-promotional; this language was added by User:Bioethicsgeek, who has only edited the AJOB page and the page of editor Glenn McGee, whose own bio page has a history with conflicts of interest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.229.208.196 (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact Factor Language 
Talk:Rangayana

message: It'd be helpful if the article explained the connection between "Kalamandira" and "Rangayana" - when asking directions using English, most people seem to refer to this place as "Kalamandira" or "Kalamandir" and not as "Rangayana" (which apparently is its official name?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.172.190.183 (talk) 04:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:
File talk:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg

message: What is meant by "This photo also shows the undisturbed patch of ground before he placed his boot there"? It clearly shows a disturbed patch of ground post-boot-placing. Robert K S 02:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just about to ask that as well, perhaps there's something we aren't seeing? Jihiro 03:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Something makes me think there was a pair of photos and the caption text was inadvertantly copied between them. I'm going to delete the questionable text pending explanation. Robert K S 03:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, no I won't, not while it's protected as a featured image. Robert K S 03:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Me too, what does that mean???--SGT Tex16:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno, but it's been in the Commons description since 2006 January 10. howcheng {chat} 16:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: It means that the photo shows Aldrin's bootprint and it also shows the how the ground looked like naturally (I.E. the area where Aldrin didn't step on) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.243.42 (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear text

message: Why is Buzz Aldrin showing up in red. Can't edit page at the moment to fix it :( User A1 08:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's linking to commons:Buzz Aldrin, which doesn't exist. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 11:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: From my perspective it is a little bit confusing, why link to commons at all? Commons is as far as i can see (which may not be all that far) simply a media repository, which is not why we have wikilinks, wikilinks should be for linking encyclopaedic information, IMHO. User A1 23:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What you were seeing was the Commons description page, not the en-WP one. howcheng {chat} 16:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldrin's link 

message: AFAIK the photographs taken on the Moon were full-colour photographs. Even if there was not much colour visible on the Moon, I think the colour-information (in this case the colour of the Moon-surface) should be preserved. 93.216.204.251 (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has this picture been converted to greyscale?
Talk:Moses Macdonald

message: This article was started using public domain information from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. LarryQ 02:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert F. Dorr

message: The name of the writer should be Robert F. Dorr in the title as well as the body so that you can transfer his name from a cover of a book directly to the Wikipedia search engine.  The Wikipedia search engine searches successfully for Robert Dorr, but not Robert F. Dorr Exarctly 04:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I interview Mr. Dorr, is it then admissable to add the information?  I thought this qualified as original research. Mark Sublette (talk) 00:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rugby union in Georgia

message: The sections "Rising to the world cup challenge" and "Georgia record first RWC win" read more like a fansite/newspaper report (eg "Georgian gladiators") than an encyclopedia article; someone with good knowledge of Georgian rugby should reword them. The report of the first win seems too long, as well; we don't need to know every little detail, and the last line is out of date. 86.149.2.192 (talk) 01:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone needs to be more encyclopedic
Talk:Smooth 91.5

message: Given That the information on both Vega 91.5 and Vega 95.3 is also found on the Vega (radio network) article, i strongly suggest we merge these two articles i have pointed out into one article it seems pointless given there is little info on the individual pages.
Thankyou
Gross. Advertize (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I object to the move. We should move the details from Vega (radio network) here, not merge. Each radio station is notable on its own. Guy0307 (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge With Vega Radio Network Article
Talk:Rectangle method

message: Is this not the same as the Riemann sum article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.97.112 (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; it is the same as the Riemann sum. There is a stale merge proosal (open for 4 years) suggesting a merge to Riemann integral; however, the merge to Riemann sum suggestion is better; I'll change the tag and hopefully that will stimulate some discussion. Klbrain (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nectar robbing

message: The plant is robbed of its nectar. The nectar is stolen. "Nectar robbing" is less than fully literate: Nectar stealing is the literate title of this article. And recently it's been on Wikipedia's main page.--Wetman (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although both "nectar robbing" and "nectar stealing" are found in the scientific literature (e.g. scholar.google.com search) or the web (e.g. google.com search), the former is far more common. Kingdon (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, doesn't that say something. And it says something about Wikipedia, that where the scientific literature is divided, Wikipedia comes down firmly on the less-literate side. Nectar robber would be perfectly correct. wny would there be any objections to that title?--Wetman (talk) 01:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:COMMONNAME. As for objections to Nectar robber, I think it's preferable that the title reflects the focus of the article, and this is the phenomenon itself, not specifically one participant in the phenomenon. Ypna (talk) 21:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Death of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky

message: I am not going to make any changes myself, but "Final Days" needs editing. T. should not be referred to by his first name; the paragraph sounds like an eye-witness report of one of T.'s contemporaries. According journalistic standards and as a form of due respect, T. should always be mentioned by use of his last name or full name, respectively. Experience maker (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of first name 

message: Surely, the main reason for having this as a separate article on that on Tchaikovsky is that there  has been so much controversy over whether it was death through suicide? I have read that entire doctoral theses have been devoted to this subject. I heard on the BBC Radio 4 arts programme Front Row tonight (July 17 2009) a man argue that Tchaikovsky did not commit suicide. I am sure the same man was on theProms, stating that a jovial piece he composed at about the same time as the Pathetitque goes against the suicide theory. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over whether it was suicide or not

message: Just repairing the fact that someone changed his nephew's name to Bob - amusing but innacurate.--ayyem (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, "Bob" is highly accurate, according to Brown, Holden, Poznansky and Warrack, to name four biographers of Tchaikovsky. Vladimir Davydov was referred to as "Bob" by the Davydov family and by the composer— see p. 333 of Poznansky's Tchaikovsky: The Quest for the Innner Man, for one source, which has now been cited in the section called to question. Jonyungk (talk) 20:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short name fix 

message: The last paragraph of the section notes that the Trombone plays a quotation from the "Russian Orthodox Mass for the Dead." This is critical evidence that should be referenced / better cited.
Upon listening and viewing the score, I can state that there is definitely a brief chorale setting here, but, not knowing the Russian Orthodox Mass for the Dead, I cannot confirm its musical or textual source. Can anyone else? Since the rest of the article is well-cited, I'm guessing the information comes from some of the previous sources, but which of those are unclear.
I created an "External Links" section and added a link to the IMSLP page for both the score and recording. This is not intended to suffice as a citation, but will enable others to easily find the passage discussed. This would probably be better suited as a "Note" within that particular paragraph instead, but I do not know the proper criteria or syntax for creating notes. Please feel free to adjust.
108.222.223.224 (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathetique as a Requiem - Musical Evidence
Talk:Rocky Point (Massachusetts)

message: Is there some reason a Jehovah's Witness "Kingdom Hall" is mentioned in this article? Does it have some historical interest, or is it just one of hundreds of such meeting places all over America, analogous to run-of-the-mill churches or synagogues?
Not sure why it's being mentioned.Chillowack (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Jehovah's Witness meeting hall mentioned?
Talk:We TV

message: AT&T U-verse is about to say goodbye to AMC, Independent Film Channel and WE tv in less than two days unless it makes a deal with Rainbow Media...which is not going to be very easy!! AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodbye, AMC; Goodbye, IFC; Goodbye, WEtv 

message: AT&T U-verse still carries AMC, Independent Film Channel and WE tv, despite the ongoing dispute between AT&T and Rainbow Media. AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AT&T U-verse still carries AMC, Independent Film Channel and WE tv, despite the ongoing dispute between AT&T and Rainbow Media. 

message: I'm happy to report that AT&T and Rainbow Media have reached an agreement to keep AMC, Independent Film Channel and WE tv on AT&T U-verse. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So AT&T and Rainbow Media have finally reached an agreement.  Hooray!! 

message: Why was the old WE logo deleted? As far as I'm aware, we're not in the practice of deleting old logos. Fry1989 (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old logo 

message: Sir/mam I am from India, i completed my masters in engeneering, currently I have my electric vehicle showroom, apart that I am interested in other countries drama..like me there are many peoples are interested in Asian , European dramas in India. But they can't watch it because it's not dubbed, there are many dramas which has subtitles but they don't get it wether they should watch or read ...i personally prefer subtitles because all country dramas are not dubbed..if you want hindi dilogue of any drama ..then plesae contact me..I will be thankful  if I get this work 103.77.22.235 (talk) 09:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Want to work with you 

message: Stop financing this woman. I cannot stand looking at her or watching her.She is destroying Pumpkin and Josh's marriage. Ella is the star now. Quit enabling this monster, please. Russ 2601:601:C97F:A830:ED79:3660:D733:3C52 (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mama june 

message: I always have problems with this app the show goes dark well still play show been doing it for years that’s why I want pay for it rip off always click of while watching tv too many problems 2600:1700:3496:0:10DD:454E:E407:E996 (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  App problems
Talk:Ilaria Spada

message: Ilaria Spada has ITALIAN father (not Welsh) and TUNISIAN mother (not italian from veneto), and her surname SPADA isn't a pseudonym, it's her REAL anagraphical name (that in any case means SWORD in english).
I don't know why of this false statement about the surname "SWORD", but i am italian and the same age and city of Ilaria Spada, and knowed her at school.
In any case please check italian wiki or any other mean to confirm these facts! (f. ex. check on google for Ilaria Spada = Hillary Sword and won't obtain nothing (except for what copied from wikipedia old versions).
Hi All
--79.3.219.76 03:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Chicken Roaster

message: Sorry; I didn't notice that a no trivia tag was already on the page
It's best we ignore the no trivia tags anyway, as those sections are always the most interesting parts of articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.182.124.254 (talk) 15:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting  

message: The article mentions the hat was George's in one section and then says it was Elane's in the next? Whose hat was it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.20.228 (talk) 01:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whose hat?
Talk:Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp.

message: In SCO v. Novell, the court ruling (found here) states:
Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp., 383 F.3d 965, 967-68 (reversing district court’s holding that plaintiff could not bring a breach of contract claim when copyright infringement claim was dismissed)
on lines 5-7 of page 70.  I'm not sure if this will impact this article or not. Dpbjinc 03:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of Case Overturned?
Talk:If I Can't Dance

message: The song WAS NOT released as a single ANYWHERE. It was going to be the 4th single but ultimately cancelled, It wasn't released anywhere even as a digital single. The cover isn't even real, it's a fan made. The picture is from one of the early magazines that Sophie did promoting the album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jexim77 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Addington Railway Workshops

message: The intro said "...were previously in Carlyle Street...", but I'm pretty sure this is not the case, and there's nothing in the body, nor any reference given. So I've chopped it out. - Snori (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: nix Carlyle Street
Talk:Paul Dayton Bailey

message: I think based on the number of books and publications, that this author deserves a biography, and seems to meet the criteria necessary for noteriety classification.  I agree that it relies on a single souce, but that appears to be an autobiography and thus should be accurate. Bobweenig  — Preceding undated comment added 19:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have placed a POV tag on the article. It sounds like it was written as a family history, or copied from a family history. Definitely needs some cleaning up. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I think based on the number of books and publications, that this author deserves a biography, and seems to meet the criteria necessary for noteriety classification.  I agree that it relies on a single souce, but that appears to be an autobiography and thus should be accurate. Hot Dog (talk) 19:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography and Notoriety
Talk:Role-playing game creation software

message: Someone's flagged this with "This article or section is written like an advertisement". Wouldn't that be more an appropriate concern for a page that was about say, one company's product or products, rather than a generic class of product? If it literally is just something being said about RPG Makers collectively, I can't really see what, nor why anybody should care. If it was something about one of the specific products, I can't see anything egregious there either, sorry. If I had to criticise the page, it'd be that it could do with more interesting content, such as describing what most of them involve and what variations there are. --195.92.168.163 04:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What advertising? 

message: States that it is a "Great Project, very powerful".  "Easy to install..." "For more information please see the link in 'external links' section".  I feel this is too biased and feels like and ad.  Fixed and link set up similar to ReelFeelengine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.170.105 (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias for RPGds 

message: I removed this section for lack of notability, at least no more than any other program on this list. Was written as an advertisement and offers no more functionality than others. All claims based on opinion. Also adding it to the links. ---JamesWill (talk) 06:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Eclipse 

message: remove it? find new version?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.112.175 (talk) 06:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  last link is dead 

message: This article lists a large number of very obscure programs and packages. I recently reverted the addition of an engine called DragonSource, based on a link which only included a forum with one post and a list of downloads with no documentation. While this is unusually flimsy, I'm sure this isn't the only weak entry here. This list doesn't necessarily have to be limited to software with existing articles, but there does need to be some criteria beyond just having a website, otherwise this becomes a source of spam or worse. I don't think DragonSource is malevolent, but it's hard to say with total confidence, and it would be far too easy for spam or malware to slip through the cracks on a list like this. Grayfell (talk) 03:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links