lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Direct Client-to-Client

message: Since the reply to a PRIVMSG should not be another PRIVMSG, a CTCP reply is implemented with a NOTICE. But is the DCC ACCEPT reply, which is a reply to a reply, a CTCP message or a CTCP reply? I guess that it should be a reply, and implemented with NOTICE, but it would be nice to have this confirmed.
:The IRC part of the DCC handshake is done entirely as CTCP non-replies (i.e. PRIVMSG).  Thus, the ACCEPT and RESUME messages disobey the RFC-1459 guidelines about automatic responses (intended to prevent runaway loops between robots).  Automatic responses (of any kind) to NOTICE are also forbidden (which is why IRC servers don't complain if you send a NOTICE to a non-existant target).  So dialogues between robots are limited to a single exchange.  One of the basic stupidities of DCC is that it does too much via IRC, rather than getting to its direct connection ASAP, and finishing its handshaking there. —StationaryTraveller 14:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CTCP vs. CTCP reply 

message: The only specification I could find for XMIT was an old working draft, which expired long ago. Was XMIT never accepted as a standard?
:"DCC standard" is an oxymoron ;) —StationaryTraveller 14:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  XMIT 

message: The DCC Send Exploit is less than helpful to me, as I'm supposedly affected after being notified by IRC ops. In particular, this part, "Replacing [character argument] with a string of 14 or more characters ..." doesn't mean a thing; where is this [character argument] supposed to exist?
I feel the description here is ok except for that unexplained part, but a link with more details would be really helpful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcooncat (talk • contribs) 09:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DCC Send Exploit
Talk:Let's Get to It

message: Well at 200,000 copies sold it can't be that rare. It's hardly the holy grail of rarities. Just had a look at Amazon - selling 6 copies from £9.99. And on ebay for 99p.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 06:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rare? 

message: What a mess of a fan article this is. First in the text it says it was recorded during the summer of 1991, but in the box it says recorded 1990-1991. So which one is it?
And the it starts with saying it was well received by critics (lacking sources), going on in the next paragraphs saying it received RAVE reviews from the top UK critics (again lacking sources). And to top it all off, the only review with a source is a 2,5 stars out of 5 from allmusic. Now what's FAR from well received.Dollvalley (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs quotes and sources for reviews

message: The track listing format used in this article is out of date. I'm too much of a lazy-ass myself, so will someone else fix it, please? Thank you in advance...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.98.218.120 (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider it done! --SuperHotWiki (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date formatting 
Talk:Coconut oil

message: What is coconut "wick?"  Mentioned in first sentence. 2601:645:C201:5890:1033:31A6:757F:E829 (talk) 03:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, thanks. Likely a deliberate error. That word was added over a year ago in this edit without any explanation. Because the lead section is supposed to summarize the body of the article, I changed it back to "kernels", which are mentioned in the article body, while "wick" is not. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  coconut wick?
Talk:American Thighs

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 15:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Theodore of Mopsuestia

message: There is no mention here of Theodore's commentary on John. An English translation of fairly substantial Greek fragments was published early in 2004. It is interesting for two reasons: (1) it seems clearly orthodox; (2) the contrast with the Syriac version is fairly serious: it suggests that the attacks on him may have been at least partly due to using inaccurate translations. I believe the article on the Three Chapters needs at least a reference to the continuing concerns about the accuracy of the summaries used as the basis for Theodore's condemnation. This recent publication seems to cast even more doubt on the condemnation.
--hedrick@rutgers.edu
There is a problem with having material from sources almost a hundred years old, as much work has been done on Syriac texts involving Theodore,e. g. the Tonneau and Devreese edition of his baptismal catecheses in 1949.The presence of older material fills a gap, but poses problems of style for those wishing to complement it. These remarks hold a fortiori for the extensive use of Philip Schall in other patristic contributions.
Recent research (Nina Garsoian and others) points to an influence of Theodore in early Christian Armenia,creating the circumstances which led to Proclus' Tome to the Armenians-
---Clive Sweeting
:Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your contributions. Wikipedia is a wiki, and anyone- including you! - can edit nearly any article, at any time, by clicking the Edit This Page link at the bottom of the article. You don't even need to login, although there are several reasons why you might want to. So, feel free to make this correction yourself! If you are unsure about how to edit a page, try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. - Fennec 02:55, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This guy's considered a saint isn't he? At least in the west? Where is his saint-box, his feast day, etc? Rwflammang (talk) 01:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint?

message: Does the Assyrian Church consider Theodore a saint?
No Church which accepted the Council of Ephesus does as far as I'm aware.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.135.254 (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint? 

message: There is basically no citation or references or any sources to prove he is venerated in syro Malabar Catholic church there it must be removed unless someone provide sources 69.94.81.165 (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is He venerated in syro Malabar church
Talk:Estée Lauder (businesswoman)

message: Removed the note about Lee Israel's later forgeries (confusing) as it does not appear to be relevant here; also, cited article does not mention that. Those interested in Israel can read her own Wikipedia article.11 Arlington (talk) 06:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Biographer

message: Lauder's birthdate is in question. She was apparently born on July 1 of some year.   The year was probably either 1906 or 1908 because the news stories of her death say either "She was believed to be 95" (AP report) (CTV), or "she was 97" (Independent), or "her family said she was 97"  (NYT).  I'm going with 97. If that and my math is right, she was born in 1906. -- Ke4roh 03:02, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Her New York birth record (here) lists 1908. Also, according to census records, all of her grandparents were born in Hungary. The story of Lauder's maternal grandmother being French might have been something that was reported just to give her a French flair. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 05:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Dachau concentration camp

message: In the subdivision of the section "Liberation" called "Killing of camp guards", I want where it says "American troops killed some of the camp guards after they surrendered" to be changed to "American troops summarily executed some of the camp guards after they surrendered". 95.151.194.20 (talk) 12:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if you go on the Wikipedia article, Dachau liberation reprisals, it says the attack type were summary executions. 95.151.194.20 (talk) 20:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:WINRS. Iseult Δx parlez moi 03:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But I think the Dachau liberation reprisals fits the definition of summary executions. 95.151.194.20 (talk) 19:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 June 2023 

message: Corpses are not cremated in Crematorium ovens. They are cremated in cremation muffles 92.22.144.213 (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cremation  

message: "At least 25,613 prisoners are believed to have been murdered in the camp and almost another 10,000 in its subcamps,[20] primarily from disease, malnutrition and suicide." Are you sure that they were murdered by suicide? 2401:7000:C227:201:9DF4:7BB3:E099:4942 (talk) 07:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 09:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording of article
Talk:Eurasian Plate

message: I think that whoever wrote this needs to do a better job on explaining because this is not clear at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your contributions. Wikipedia is a wiki, and anyone- including you! - can edit nearly any article, at any time, by clicking the Edit This Page link at the bottom of the article. You don't even need to login, although there are several reasons why you might want to. So, feel free to be bold and make this correction yourself! If you are unsure about how to edit a page, try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. - Fennec 03:17, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of religious leaders in 2003

message: #REDIRECT Talk:List of 21st-century religious leaders
Note that all of the Catholic Churches do have leaders, I just haven't been able to find out who that leader is for some of the smaller ones. -- Jonel 03:36, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: This is just a list of religious leaders. It is not intended to describe the relations between churches, their opinion about each other, etc. If you think otherwise than all points of view should be presented here, which would make this article anything but a "List of religious leaders". 
If only POV of only one group of churches is presented, this should be marked with the POV tag.--AndriyK 10:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Canonicity
Talk:Abstract class

message: I want to delete
Contrast with abstract classes (last line) .
Is this OK?
Whowever placed this, correct or delete.
----
Since the entry "concrete class" is redirected to this "abstract class" entry, I moved the definition of concrete class to a place where it can be found more easily by the reader. --Alexandre 02:01, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the 'contrast with abstract class' but pls feel free to edit as appropriate. Yes it is OK.--Jondel 01:21, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:SoBe

message: There's some controversy because the drinks aren't technically vegetarian.  The contain cochineal bugs for the red or orange color. -kslays (talk • contribs) 18:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cochineal Bugs 

message: I don't get it, why doesn't this article even mention the fact that SoBe drinks have had messages on the bottoms of their caps for who-knows-how-long? I'd heard they stopped doing that, so I went on Wikipedia to see if they had any info on it, but it turns out, they don't mention it at all! What gives?
If anyone could find out about it and maybe edit the article, that would be nice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.139.145.243 (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bottlecap Messages 

message: I saw a taster stall in England yesterday.  I think a section should be added Sweetie candykim (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is it sold? 

message: SoBe Mr. Green → SoBe
I am proposing to merge the article SoBe Mr. Green into this one. It is a minor flavor that ahs since been discontinued and could easily be included here. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 23:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Disagree. I think this beverage is notable in its own right.  To merge all of the information from SoBe Mr. Green into the SoBe article would result in Mr. Green, a historical item, suddenly dominating a company article which is mostly full of trivial tidbits, and sparing in detail or sources about its present and long-term (and very similar) products to begin with.  Mr. Green sits handily aside from any other SoBe product, being the only carbonated offering ever available.  Mr. Green's article is heavily validated by sources which give further credence for it to stand on its own.  In full disclosure, I am the creator of the Mr. Green article, but no other input has been placed here as neither of these articles is very heavily visited, so I mostly wanted to state my reasons for disagreeing with merging the article so such an action won't take place without at least a dissenting opinion being voiced. --CrunchySkies (talk) 21:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: For a short time, SoBe drinks were originally marketed under the name "South Beach". As I worked at the Staten Island-based South Beach Psychiatric Center, I took note when an iced tea line named South Beach hit the stores many years back. This photo is of a few of those early bottles, which have a bas-relief lizard in the glass. They disappeared for a time and came back as SoBe. I always assumed they'd lost a copyright battle for the name, but I don't actually know that. There's no reference to the original "South Beach" name in the Wikipedia entry for SoBe. Yet here are some bottles, which I bought in stores and saved all these years. 
TonyParkSlope (talk) 23:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early bottles
Talk:Ancien régime/Old talk

message: The history for the content that this archive refers to can now be found at Talk:Ancien Régime/Old history. Graham87 09:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Rather than scatter merge discussion over the place, let's centralize it at Talk:Estates of the realm#Proposed merge -- Jmabel | Talk 08:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Badshahi Masjid

message: I believe that the Faisal Mosque in Islamabad is larger than the Badshahi Masjid.  I have been to the Badshahi Masjid too, and I believe it can hold a lot more than 5,000 people.  DigiBullet 05:16, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: In this and several other Pakistan-related articles, there is considerable discrepancy between the purported translations of names and the actual meaning. In this case, 'Badshahi Masjid' does not mean 'Royal Mosque' but 'King's Mosque'. You may quibble the difference, but it is important to have correct meanings and not just vague translations.
:I changed the choti he in 'bādśāhī' from هى- to ەى- and forgot to say so in my edit summary (that's all I edited). I also agree the literal translation is important. Khiradtalk 22:52, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The meaning of the name
Talk:Hell Freezes Over

message: I ain't no expert on this album, the Eagles, pop-culture metaphors, or Hell, but the last sentence in the introduction seems to be a might bit facetious for encyclopedic standards. Apart from that, extreme cold being better than extreme heat seems more an issue of personal preference than actual fact. Should the colon after "apt" be a semi-colon? 66.133.180.69 05:20, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Americium

message: i think that NASA is planning to use Am²⁴² for spacecraft 2402:4000:2200:57F3:3D0E:41F3:6098:2587 (talk) 05:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, they would use the isomer Am-242m, because the ground state half-life is too short to be useful. If you'd like to add this to the article, though, be sure to include a reliable source. Complex/Rational 21:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Uses 

message: Atomic mass unit is measured by one sixth of its weight I think. We should be able to calcule that and yet its still Predicted. Why is that? UB Blacephalon (talk) 03:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why don't we have a proper atomic mass for macroscopic elements? 

message: The description of americium trifluoride solubility in this page states that it's poorly soluble, whereas the main article on americium trifluoride states that it is "a water soluble solid". Pygos (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solubility of americium trifluoride
Talk:Sutra Pitaka

message: I would argue for the latter.  The Sutta Pitaka article is currently exclusively the Pāli Canon, whereas there are a whole lot of sutras that could be placed in the Sutra Pitaka other than just the Pali ones. - Nat Krause 05:59, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, kinda.  "Sutta Pitaka" is just a way of saying "Sutra Pitaka" in Pāli.  But Buddhist wonks don't normally use Pāli unless they are talking specifically about Theravada and the Pāli Canon.  There are a lot of other collections of sutras, containing, for instance, Mahayana or Vajrayana sutras, but they are normally referred to in Sanskrit, hence "Sutra Pitaka" (and even that isn't very common from what I've seen).  So, I would say that technically "Sutta Pitaka" and "Sutra Pitaka" should refer to the same thing, and it should include any sutra collection.  However, since no one ever uses the Pāli unless they are Theravadins or talking about Theravadins, I think it's close enough to assume that Sutta Pitaka refers specifically to the Pāli Canon. - Nat Krause 14:56, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: Yeah, that's a lot better. - Nat Krause 15:25, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this redirect to [[Sutta Pitaka]] or to [[Buddhist texts]]?

message: In trying to fix incoming links to this page as part of the project WP:Disambiguation pages with links, I found so many circular links that it made me dizzy. I can see from the other entries on this talk page that others have also been confused. Should this page really be a DAB page, or would it be better as an article (perhaps short) explaining the term more fully? This DAB page does not seem to help in navigating the subject matter. - Gorthian (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this really be a DAB page?
Talk:Mitch Kapor

message: As a person who only infrequently edits in Wikipedia, I hesitate to make a change to this article. However,  if Wikipedia articles are assumed to be read in a linear fashion, It seems to me as though the first reference in the current version of the article to Mitch Kapor's wife requires her full name instead of just referring to her as Klein. Thank you for your consideration. 2600:1014:B136:3DE9:9D4C:C55F:106B:6758 (talk) 02:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I also wonder why SMASH, Freada Kapor's non-profit IT-education organization, doesn't have a WP article—it seems to deserve one. (The SMASH link should point there, IMHO, rather than to SMASH's site, and the latter should be in External Links.) I'd start it myself if I had the time and know-how. – AndyFielding (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  May Need A Small Edit
Talk:Operation Mockingbird

message: It makes no sense to have the opinions of "q-anon" supporters, a small fringe minority, summarized here- especially in such a brief article. Not only is it irrelevant to the historical program that this article is about, but its random inclusion here at the end of the article (using opinion language) seems designed to discredit the actual subject of the article by associating it with this modern day fringe group's opinion on "fake news". The relevancy to "operation mockingbird" is basically zero, and its inclusion in such a brief article implies not only that it's relevant, but that it's an important piece of information relative to "operation mockingbird"- a program alleged to have taken place in the 60s and 70s. How can this sentence possibly be viewed as relevant to this topic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stistrash (talk • contribs) 14:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Qanon is a notable fringe minority and cited sources are explicit regarding its relevance to the topic. - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure the sources cited do make it obvious that QAnon is relevant to the article, as the sources are mainly about QAnon; it would be better to find a source that is mainly about "Operation Mockingbird" that mentions QAnon and not the other way around. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove reference to "Q-anon" 

message: They are associated by name only? Politically motivated inclusion? 72.53.215.109 (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is only mentioned because they get conflated. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre inclusion of project mockingbird
Talk:New Rome

message: What is the first sentence of this article trying to say? ... Someone should copyedit this. — Timwi 08:34, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have linked to a Mussolini speech since its relevant to the section.
However I had to use the Internet Archive (thanks) since the site seems sequestered by an Asti or Pordenone court.
I hope it's not a problem.
--Error 01:26, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fascist link

message: Isn't Washington D.C. worth mentioning? i'm making this suggestion in light of all those buildings in the D.C. Area that were based on roman architecture.   Oren neu dag 22:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any reputable references that call WDC New Rome? `'Miikka 03:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually there is a belief amongn the european left and christian patriot groups that since england was ruled by the Normans in the 11th century and were also claimants to the throne of france, than by a continuation of the rule of charlemagne (from the translatio imperii), the english (and later the british) are succesors to the roman empire, and after the decline of the british empire in the post WW2 era the Americans (who lead the free world at the time) became the succesors of the british and by that also the succesors of the roman empire. (more about that in Translatio_imperii#Miscellaneous). Oren neu dag 12:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The abovementioned "Miscellaneous" are deleted as unreferenced dubious speculations. `'Míkka 18:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would mention Washington DC as well. It's no coincidence that the U.S. system was partly based on the Roman republic and that is why there is so much roman architecture in DC (Capitol, named after the hill in Rome, etc.) Gryffindor 11:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Granted, my source isn't a scholarly reference (which is why I don't change the article myself) but in The Lost Symbol, Dan Brown argues that the founding fathers originally called DC "New Rome." Does anyone if there's any truth to this? David Youngberg (talk) 02:00, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: what about [[Washington, D.C.]]?

message: I have just added a  to each of the unreferenced claims in this article. All these claims require references if they are to remain in the article. – ukexpat (talk) 13:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorely lacking references
Talk:West York Island

message: I posted the last article; sorry I infringed Wikipedia's copyright policy, although, at the time, I thought I was within my right to post the text, bearing in mind that the original page (from which I copied it) has no copyright notices. My mistake. I've now written and posted a new page, which does not infringe anybodys copyright. --Xanatos 2097 09:01, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled