Talk:Nuclear decommissioning

message: There is a confusingly similar article called "Decommissioning nuclear facilities". 217.41.240.15 12:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the problem was fixed. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 16:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No mention of the Experience of Trojan, Connectict Yankee and Maine Yankee? Simesa (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Experience

message: I propose to merge Nuclear entombment into this article as one option of decommissioning. Beagel (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem to have attracted any attention. Should also merge in SAFSTOR - these are 2 K or 3K long each, and wouldn't make this article unmanageably long.  Or is it useful to separate the "nuts and bolts" of different decommissioning methods from a general discussion of decommissioning issues?  It was previously tagged for 2 years with no merge, so it's not a hot issue with editors.  --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Untagged, no-one has talked about this for a while. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The "Windscale" entry in the Nuclear decommissioning in Western Europe table seems to confuse two different reactors, the Winscale Advanced Gas Reactor (WAGR), a prototype Advanced gas-cooled reactor and the Windscale pile no. 1 which burned in the Windscale fire. HughesJohn (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windscale 

message: This page appears to be where links go to die. HughesJohn (talk) 09:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead liinks 

message: This is not a very complete list. What reactors are missing? There is a much much longer list of reactors decommissioned then this.... Where are all the early research reactors? Daini is not decommissioned or slated for decommissioning. 
EBR-1 
Fermi 1 
Zeep, Astra, NRX, WR-1 
SuperPhénix 
Phénix 
Ottawakismet (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Reactors 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.power-technology.com/projects/maine
*:Triggered by \bpower-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Why there are 2 separate lists for Japanese decommisioned reactors? All other countries are grouped into macroregions. I think Japanese tables should be merged into the Asia table. Moreover, I would prefer a unified table listing all reactors, sortable by country, type, year etc. This would greatly help in the reading. --Ita140188 (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the continent is just based on the country, in this case Russia. However I agree that the division by continent is not very helpful and I still think the article would look better if merged in one list. --Ita140188 (talk) 04:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate list for Japanese reactors? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nuclear decommissioning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081007221244/http://www.ukaea.co.uk/casestudies/decommissioning/windscale_advanced_gascooled_reactor/index.asp to http://www.ukaea.co.uk/casestudies/decommissioning/windscale_advanced_gascooled_reactor/index.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The costs of decommissioning are shown in various currencies and time periods - annual, total, weekly, etc. Would it not make sense to standardize this? Netherzone (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  It would be good, but not easy to do, specially because many currencies tend to fluctuate a lot!87.12.202.62 (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Standardizing costs 

message: The article doesn't make it clear whether or not "nuclear decommissioning" includes arms reduction. NeonMerlin 09:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this include disarming weapons? 

message: I don't see any links to the duration of nuclear decommission, how long will it take.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.29.7 (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Long Will It take to decommission of the various proccess? 

message: Your list of decommissioning of nuclear reactors does not include Windscale 1 and 2, in Britain. On 10 October 1957
Windscale #1 caught fire. The core used graphite bricks and the graphite caught fire sending clouds of radioactive smoke across the north of England and Scandinavia. I suggest this event is included in your list and marked as a red. Many people died of cancer and it was as dangerous as 3-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale_fire
I was 13 years old and living nearby. 2001:44B8:2182:FC00:9572:35A0:D855:E883 (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear Decommissioning: There is an error in your list-table of decommissioning of nuclear reactors.