lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Fremantle, 4th Baron Cottesloe

message: Should there be a link to the 'BetsyGate'<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betsygate - the political scandal involving the wife of present Conservative Minister Ian Duncan Smith during the 1980s?  Referenced Daily Mail article here demonstrates she is his descendant http://edinburgheye.wordpress.com/2012/01/22/challenge-iain-duncan-smith/ 79.70.234.144 (talk) 23:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to 'BetsyGate' ?
Talk:Uma Blasini

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# As nom -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 12:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # As nom -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 12:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: :Note that comments here are welcome, but contributors may also wish to add their "vote" to one of the sections above for clarity and ease of closing administrator. --After Midnight 0001 16:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Support of the move 

message: I just noticed that XLR8TION has filed a mediation request on this subject at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation#Wilma Blasini Perez.  I just want to say that I think that this is ridiculous at the present time with the move request in process and editorial consensus 3-1 in favour of the move.  
Further the editor contends that "Aliases for beauty queens such as one stated for Marisol Malaret and Barbara Palacios have never affected the article's titling, therefore same should be applied to this article as well." This actually supports the contention that the article should be renamed "Uma Blasini".  Palacios's real name is "Barbara Pérez Hernández" but the article is titled "Bárbara Palacios" because that is the name she most commonly goes by.  Similiarly in this case, although Perez' first name is "Wilmadilis Blasini Pérez", she most is most commonly known as "Uma Blasini" and thus that is what the article should be titled. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 00:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation Request 

message: *Google news archive search for "Wilma Blasini" - 4 hits
*Search for "Uma Blasini" - 29 main hits and many, many more subhits.
I think this fairly conclusively supports the move request. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 00:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google News Archive search looks pretty conclusive:
Talk:Johannes Bogerman

message: This page was moved a few times from Johann to Johan and back. However, it is very, very clear from other sources that he is almost always called Johannes, so I have moved it to Johannes Bogerman. See e.g. all books, books in Dutch only or books in German only, compared to Johann or Johan. Please stick with the name usually used by reliable sources when discussing a person. Fram (talk) 08:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:John Sinclair, 1st Baron Pentland

message: There's something weird about the picture. Is it legit? ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Baldwin III of Jerusalem

message: Some sources say 1162, others 1163. Dougweller (talk) 09:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We should make a list here...I thought it was pretty well established that he died in 1163. To give one relevant recent work, Malcolm Barber's The Crusader States gives February 10, 1163. Adam Bishop (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

text: All the best recent sources in English (Barber, Riley-Smith, Hamilton, etc), French (Richard), and German (Mayer) seem to give February 10, 1163 as the date. Actually all the good French sources going back to the 19th century agree on 1163, Mas Latrie for example. There are some sources that give 1162, but they are all rather old (Runciman, Stevenson, etc). I'm sure the discrepancy comes from William of Tyre. It's possible that he is using a calendar that starts in March (or later), so February 1163 is still 1162 for him, but from what I know of William and his system of dating, that is not the case at all, it is simply that he was astoundingly bad at giving correct dates even for events he witnessed personally. The date is certainly 1163. Adam Bishop (talk) 09:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of death uncertain
Talk:Gershchenkron effect

message: This is a misspelling of Alexander Gerschenkron. There is an existing article on the Gerschenkron effect. --SueHay 01:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Humblemost apology, begging your pardon but, you are mistaken. Spelled in this manner, Gersh-chen-kron is, in fact, correct. 
Your page entitled Gerschenkron effect is an abomination. Either page on this topic, they are not entitled "Alexander Gershchenkron," per say. Are they? They're entitled, the Gershchenkron effect. Aren't they? To wit, content on these pages should be devoid biographical content with respect to Economist "Alexander Gershchenkron," instead focused, upon the effect. 
Wouldn't you agree? - A. Samuel Joseph III, Geospatial Econometric Analyst 19:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not agree. You are mistaken. Please see http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/GERCON.html. --SueHay 01:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not a misspelling, of Alexander Gershchenkron 

message: ~ Okay... fine. You're right. I'm wrong. Fair enough? Again, humblemost apologies for everything. You are quite right: the existing page is far more appropriate. Feel free to delete this page, and/or shoehorn a link, to yours. I'll buzz off, now. Okay? A. Samuel Joseph III, Geospatial Econometric Analyst 01:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We all make mistakes, and you certainly didn't make an irrepairable mistake by putting your contributions to Wikipedia here in this article. There'd be nobody editing Wikipedia if we all dropped out the first time we made a spelling error! Be patient. Look at some of the other articles, and read some of the other discussions.  Nobody owns any articles in Wikipedia. --SueHay 03:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A misspelling of Alexander Gershchenkron 

message: ~ No more for me... Have a nice life :) A. Samuel Joseph III, Geospatial Econometric Analyst 04:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations! YOU WIN!
Talk:John Weld-Forester, 2nd Baron Forester

message: The 2nd Baron Forester did marry, but had no children.  Cited details of the marriage to follow.Cloptonson (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They have been added, cited to Complete Peerage.  His wife was daughter of a Prussian Count and widow of the 3rd and last Viscount Melbourne but marriage childless.Cloptonson (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have since discovered two references that the couple had a son who died in infancy.  It was referred to in a Shropshire newspaper obituary in 1874, and recounted by Henry T. Weyman in 1902 in a chronological, biographical, article on MPs for Wenlock.  Neither Burke's Peerage, Debrett's nor The Complete Peerage mention this. I am citing both Weyman's and the newspaper account, neither of which named the child.  I have not found copies of the parish registers for Willey during the period available in public archives.Cloptonson (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage
Talk:Naim Kryeziu

message: First "official" international match of Albania is 1945, how come he made is debut before 1939? Matthew_hk tc 04:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National debut 
Talk:Charlotte Winters

message: The 1900 census lists Charlotte Berry as born Nov 1897.
Source Citation: Year: 1900; Census Place: Washington, Washington, District of Columbia; Roll: T623 163; Page: 4A; Enumeration District: 117. 
Ryoung122 16:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So she didn't exaggerate, luckily for us. Extremely sexy 22:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age confirmation
Talk:Najmieh Batmanglij

message: Is Najmieh Jewish? She is referenced on many jewish websites, she has made commentries on Persian Jewish cuisine.http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/dining/24passover.html And she fled Iran before the 1979 Iranian revolution as many Persian Jews did. 94.8.127.106 (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: Not questioning the many awards and achievements, but there really should be citations for them, if only to follow Wikipedia guidelines.  But, also, those sources are usually places where interested readers can find more information.  Zlama (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations? 

message: Pahlavi Iran would be more accurate for her place of birth given it was 1947. Why is this being removed? Joojay (talk) 03:26, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth; [[Pahlavi Iran]] or Imperial Iran vs. [[Iran]]
Talk:Joseph Watson, 1st Baron Manton

message: I would suggest that there is a series of spelling errors in the section headed Armourials 
The word should be Armorials as is shown in the reference to Burke's Armorial
Alan Longbottom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Historydb (talk • contribs) 06:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Morača River

message: The image text describes the image as depicting a "canyon".  I think anyone whose vernacular includes the word "canyon" would readily agree that what is found in this picture is a ravine (an article that, itself, is in serious need of assistance), not a canyon.  Any objections to changing the caption and the associated text in the article?  Tomertalk 01:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text in image caption
Talk:Nana (rapper)

message: In the German Wikipedia it says that he moved to Hamburg at the age of twelve, not ten. Which is correct?--Mycomp (talk) 14:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: With no reliable sources, it doesn't matter. The article may as well say she moved to Indonesia at the age of 65. --Muhandes (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Germany
Talk:Lionel Sackville-West, 2nd Baron Sackville

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Was he not thrown into the Potomac? Or is that just an exaggerated version of the tale of the Murchison letter?Paulturtle (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potomac
Talk:Nancy Baym

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 06:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Class parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment

message: I'm removing the prod tag, as the author seems to have written a notable book . I'll try to do some more fixing up later. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: This person may very well be a significant educator in the field of media, but you wouldn't know it from this apparently self-submitted entry. I actually came here to learn about her, but I'm outie. Perhaps her university has a legitimate bio, or its alumni magazine. Anything but this, although I'm thrillllllled to learn that she has uploaded photos to her "flickr" page. That's Wikitastic!
Dstlascaux (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entirely unacceptable self-promotion 

message: Considering her level of influence, it would be helpful to include a section detailing her early life. 
--Duckori (talk) 05:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Life 

message: A number of references in the section about her Personal life are missing references, and/or contain broken links, which need to be replaced. It would also help the credibility of the article to use more sources outside of her own website, publications, etc. 
--Duckori (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Lionel Tennyson, 3rd Baron Tennyson

message: Question: Would it be appropriate for the article to have a link to the just-released Kindle ebook of From Verse to Worse?
(http://amzn.com/B00X6EDKQ8)
If so, would it be more appropriate to linkify the string "From Verse to Worse" in the body of the article or add it as an External Reference?
Bdenckla (talk) 23:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to Kindle 1933 autobio? 

message: Here and in about a million other cricket articles Cricket Archive is cited as a reference. It's not very useful when it's subscriber-only. Captain Pedant (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cricket Archive
Talk:Nancy Etchemendy

message: Should "Unarctica" be mentioned on this page somewhere? It's a blog about a trip to Antarctica that Etchemendy wrote from the perspective of the main character of The Power of UN, and is described as a sequel to the book. Here's a link: http://www.etchemendy.com/ublog/ Alphius (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unarctica? 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 00:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Nancy Friday

message: This article does a good job detailing what Nancy Friday has done in her life, but not really what she is about.  It really should explain what a "Nancy Friday Fantasy" is!  Maikel 16:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nancy Friday Fantasy" 

message: The latest book - Beyond my Control from 2009 is missing from the Bibliography.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.220.34.230 (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added details. HairyWombat 00:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond my Control 

message: Nancy's homepage is a dead link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.161.144 (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added . HairyWombat 00:57, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homepage dead 

message: Someone wants to move Wikipedia's page about Nancy's Friday's Women on Top book from Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women's Sexual Fantasies to just "Women on Top". Thought readers of this talk page should know. More info at Women on Top. --EarthFurst (talk) 00:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move for article about Nancy's WOT book 

message: "As of 2005, Friday is currently working on her first novel."
"Lulu : a novella" was published 2012.
153.110.203.232 (talk) 12:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ms. Friday's novel 

message: nancyfriday.com no longer works :( 71.176.128.182 (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link
Talk:Cupid's Chokehold

message: I just noticed that the single cover art has a Parental Advisory label on it.  The song has NO language in it whatsoever.  What gives? Liscobeck 02:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If a single is included on an album with a PA sticker on the cover, then all songs are labeled EXPLICIT (clean or truly explicit) on iTunes. Get it now? It's the same concept. JustN5:12 18:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Photo 

message: this song should be classified as alternative hip hop. PrincessOfHearts 19:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone classified it as 'emo hip-hop', and I removed it. It is an example of alternative hip hop, and I think the only reason someone added 'emo' was because Patrick Stump features, and some might consider Fall Out Boy 'emo' (Although, I certainly don't...). Anyway, I changed it.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: I'm recommending that the article's introduction be re-written, because it contains some trivial information, and has some very misplaced bullet points there. Elenseel 06:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: The section on the most commonly shown music video (the second music video) sounds like it was written by a highschooler. It needs a more professional tone to meet quality standards. First off, phrases like "ghetto batman suit" and "making out extensively"...or, at least link to their relevant articles. --69.92.19.76 05:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a rewrite badly 

message: I've noticed that alot of stores Amazon and iTunes have listed this as "Cupid's Chokehold/Breakfast In America" instead of just "Cupid's Chokehold". I don't understand this, as "Cupid's Chokehold" only samples certain key parts of "Breakfast In America". Sarujo (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've noticed that, too.  My assumption is that it was a demand by Supertramp's record label to add it in.  But, I guess, it's possible that a lot of people wanted to know what the song was because people knew they've heard it but couldn't place it. --Wolfer68 (talk) 00:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find a source to explain it. Would love to know why it happened, maybe they used the chorus without permission. --Dignitee (talk) 11:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Title
Talk:Matthew Arthur, 1st Baron Glenarthur

message: This 4-cylinder 4-4-0 locomotive No. 11 of James Manson was built at the G&SWR's Kilmarnock Works in 1897. In 1922 R. H. Whitelegg rebuilt it with a larger boiler with the number 394 and the name "Lord Glenarthur." It was named after Sir Matthew Arthur, First Baron Glenarthur (1852-1928), Chairman of the G&SWR. Should we write a paragraph or an article about this? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locomotive 

message: Please provide a link to Thornhill in Renfrewshire, or double-check this location. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:Gebhard Truchsess von Waldburg

message: So, was he a calvinist?  If he was Lutheran instead, change WPCalvinism above to WPLutheranism
:yes, a Calvinist.  If he had been a Lutheran, the princes probably would have supported him.  But Calvinism was a heresy then, not an approved form in the Augsburg Peace 1555.Auntieruth55 (talk) 02:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calvinist 

message: added template because his notability rests in large part upon his triggering the Cologne War.Auntieruth55 (talk) 02:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military History 

message: :This review is transcluded from Talk:Gebhard Truchsess von Waldburg/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged.:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#::  -- Jack1755 (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jack, no very little on his personal life.  I might uncover some later when I do an article on the House of Waldburg, but so far, very little. Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 
Talk:Nancy Larraine Hoffmann

message: This has serious NPOV issues. Obviously Ms. Hoffmann is a former officeholder and the voters in her district must have had reasons to make her one, but the article lacks any positive accomplishments credited to a 22 year office holder. She must have done something right to win in the first place, eh? One sided hit pieces aren;t very useful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.84.60 (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Layton, 2nd Baron Layton

message: I'm not sure what it is exactly that makes this subject notable, other than the fact he managed to inherit some land by virtue of being born in the right place at the right time and has had a rather dull career in management. Oh, and he supports the conservative party.
Erm.... just strikes me that there are many, many more notable people who don't even get a mention on here. Is it just because this man is a British peer? Because that's little more than an archaic and irrelevant title these days and many, many people (even British people) will never have heard of him.
I'd like to put this forward for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure what the general consensus is so I'll leave it up for debate. What do you guys reckon?
82.109.186.194 (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Michael Morris, 3rd Baron Killanin

message: This section is unclear:
"Seen from IOC's point of interest, worse decisions were taken." Which decisions? Worse than what? Citation?
"The cities of Lake Placid, New York and Los Angeles were 'chosen' for 1980 winter and 1984 summer games without any competing cities, resulting in a demanding position of the IOC - instead of a claiming one" What does this mean?
122.107.58.27 (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: IOC presidency

message: In 1972, Michael Morris elected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallandSpringOlympics (talk • contribs) 16:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 25, 1972