lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roland Weisselberg

message: It says he was around at the time of 1505, however the death says 2006. How is this possible? Has he been living for over 500 years then? 
Here's the section, I think a 73 year old living at the time of 1505 and died at 2006 and still at age 73 is surely a mistake.
" The 73 year old Roland Weißelberg poured petrol over himself and set fire to himself in the Erfurt monastery, where Martin Luther took his monastic vows in 1505. Despite robust efforts by many on the scene who rushed to extinguish the flames, Mr. Weißelberg later died of his injuries."LostNecromancer 20:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (The 73 year old Roland Weißelberg poured petrol over himself and set fire to himself in the Erfurt monastery), where (Martin Luther took his monastic vows in 1505). 129.31.72.52 23:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Incorrect Info? 
Talk:Eastney

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 20:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bitterne Park

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Published in the 19th century mind:
https://www.hantsfieldclub.org.uk/publications/hampshirestudies/digital/1885-99/Vol_3/Darwin.pdf
©Geni (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Full paper on the Cobden Bridge hoard
Talk:Hello Kitty murder case

message: I have added a "Background", "torture", "Kidnapping", "Murder" heading (I separated the "Torture and Murder because I thought the two would be better off as individuals). I also added more references and sources to this Wiki Page. Ashleyglim (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating Article from Sandbox

message: Well, it is good spirits The ghost will be away, but there may be a chance that it will be somewhere in the city 58.153.185.250 (talk) 06:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The building being demolished
Talk:Hilsea

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 20:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The article says "The north east of Hilsea is protected from the sea by Stamshaw Esplanade which was built between 1936 and 1938.[2][13] The Esplanade also serves to connect site of Hilsea lido with Alexandra Park [13]"
I can't find Stamshaw Esplanade on the map, but wouldn't it be to the west of Hilsea, rather than the north-east? - David Biddulph (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stamshaw Esplanade 

message: This edit added text about the "world famous Brad Stares", but the only references I can find are this page (and translations). Was this added by Brad Stares themselves? --Deanna Earley (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Brad Stares?
Talk:Townhill Park

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 22:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The inclusion of a couple of low level violent crimes (from almost 10 years ago) adds nothing to this page and should be removed unless anyone has any objections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.185.161.132 (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection from me. WaggersTALK 15:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime 

message: Has reached planning stages. Need to keep an eye on.©Geni (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Townhill Green
Talk:Landport

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 20:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: A couple of the sources already attached to the article have suggestions, and I think I've seen at least one more.  The (current) southern extremity is considered Winston Churchill Avenue(citable), though overlay with Somerstown is tricky.  The eastern extremity is the A2030 road (not citable but pragmatically obvious).  At the North its currently around all Saints Church but may include the Charles Dicken Old commercial road.  At the west the border with Portsea is a tad tricky especially getting down to Landport Gate!  ITs actually likely the border has moved with time. Just to say I'm trying to reconcile it out.  Thankyou. 07:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  District boundary
Talk:Portswood

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:North End, Hampshire

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 20:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Noth end before it merged into portsmouth:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/farmer-kents-farm-north-end-24415
Slightly later but copyright status unclear:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/the-green-post-and-boundary-stone-at-north-end-25051
©Geni 03:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible pic
Talk:Somerstown, Hampshire

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-40384747
©Geni (talk) 23:42, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for cladding issues with tower blocks
Talk:Lantern

message: Should Khoom Fay fire lanterns be discussed in this article, or do they deserve their own article? They are not exactly your everyday lanterns, and definitely do not serve nearly the same purpose. Perhaps they should be in the balloon article?
how about we have a section for specialisst  lanterns in the main article,  with  links  to full articles on specialist lanterns pages?--Dr noire 20:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire lanterns

message: Sometime there'll need to be a separate articel on them. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is so much that could be said about Kerosene lanterns (Like the railroad one) 

message: tintin is the name of a smart boy in Vietnam, his name is actually Thinh Bui and he is a expert of Vietnam Travel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinhbui (talk • contribs) 18:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  tintin 

message: There's is that picture that surely is Orthodox procession but not Russian.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.75.103.246 (talk) 21:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I'm the same person who added (while I was an ip user some minutes ago) a link (to carbide lantern) to the caption of an image that obliquely mentions refers to a wonderful means of converting a solid fuel intoflammable gas by (I kid you not!), "every little once in a while" adding some water into the fuel tank. Perhaps more detailed prose in lantern, mining, and chemistry articles, discussing, at least in passing, both the chemical reaction and a range of time scales re what cavers may still, and miners used to, employ in their respective pursuits.--Jerzy•t 03:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carbide lanterns
Talk:Bassett Green

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Cosham

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm not sure the sentence regarding the pronunciation of Cosham can be justified without citing current sources (the source used is from 1971 reflecting 1960s practices).
Although a case can be made that /ˈkɒsəm/ was once its pronunication, as a resident I have very seldomly heard it used. /ˈkɒʃəm/ is almost universal as the current pronunciation. This makes neither pronunciation correct, but rather an evolution of the town's pronunciation over time. That said - I'm not sure how we would find a reliable external source to confirm this beyond residents' personal experiences!
Any thoughts? MathPlex (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: From personal experience I agree that  is the usual pronunciation, but unfortunately we're not reliable sources. Hairy Dude (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found a reference via Google Books: The Portsmouth Book of Days (2012) by John Sadden. I don't know if it would qualify as reliable, but it cites a letter from the News of 20 February 1948, which could be reliable if it could be verified. Perhaps there's a copy in a library somewhere. Hairy Dude (talk) 11:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

text: I was born Chichester, educated post primary Pompey, and my father was from Fareham originally. Nearly everyone I know will use cosh-ham, as the correct pronunciation, including most from the place itself.  And most locals know that Cosham is pronounced Cosh-ham whereas Bosham is pronounced Bozzum.  And what would include at least one of the nostalgia writers on the news.  HOWEVER: I know of two in my life who have insisted the earlier pronunciation (cozzum) is correct.  One was a teacher originally from the Isle of Wight, who if still alive would be over 100; the other is a friend of mine B., in his 80s, often seen around Havant, of was born and bred in Cosham, and he insists 'cozzum' is the correct pronunciation.  I've not tried to use /ˈkɒsəm/ and /ˈkɒʃəm/ in this as I'm not good at that sort of thing and will mess is up.  However I am not a reliable source.  If I am down near Pompey central library at some point I may try and verify that article.
Djm-leighpark (talk) 01:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

text: my Gosport relatives in their 80s have been saying Cosh'm and Boz'm all their lives. If Cossa is the origin, I'd be surprised if Coz'm was right, but the Domesday entries read Cosseham and Coseham. So it looks like an S got lost early and Coz'm became the pronunciation until the Cosh'm crowd came along. The mystery is why so few people say Bosh'm - it seems unlikely that Cosh'm comes from any knowledge of Cossa. Fuficius Fango (talk) 16:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of Cosham
Talk:Northam, Southampton

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone explain why the articles about the city suburbs have the suffix Hampshire rather than Southampton? e.g. Shirley, Hampshire rather than Shirley, Southampton (which is now a re-direct). As a Shirley resident, I don't consider that I live in Hampshire but rather in the City of Southampton, and I'm proud of it.  On looking at the edit history, most of the articles were re-named in November 2006, with the edit summary "correct form of disambiguation". Where is this policy set out? Can you imagine renaming say, Edge Hill, Liverpool to Edge Hill, Lancashire simply because it falls within the boundaries of the old county of Lancashire? Daemonic Kangaroo 10:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of articles about city suburbs 

message: Chapel and Northam -Oral History of Southampton's Dockland Communities 1900-1945
Need to check when the libraries reopen.©Geni (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The changing scene at Northam is not for loan but would be a worthwhile source for millbank tower.©Geni (talk) 10:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source

message: Was a 2013 project lead by Chris Chalkley. Need to find a source that isn't the daily mail though.©Geni (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Painted shop shutters
Talk:Millbrook, Southampton

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone explain why the articles about the city suburbs have the suffix Hampshire rather than Southampton? e.g. Shirley, Hampshire rather than Shirley, Southampton (which is now a re-direct). As a Shirley resident, I don't consider that I live in Hampshire but rather in the City of Southampton, and I'm proud of it.  On looking at the edit history, most of the articles were re-named in November 2006, with the edit summary "correct form of disambiguation". Where is this policy set out? Can you imagine renaming say, Edge Hill, Liverpool to Edge Hill, Lancashire simply because it falls within the boundaries of the old county of Lancashire? Daemonic Kangaroo 10:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of articles about city suburbs
Talk:Coxford, Southampton

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone explain why the articles about the city suburbs have the suffix Hampshire rather than Southampton? e.g. Shirley, Hampshire rather than Shirley, Southampton (which is now a re-direct). As a Shirley resident, I don't consider that I live in Hampshire but rather in the City of Southampton, and I'm proud of it.  On looking at the edit history, most of the articles were re-named in November 2006, with the edit summary "correct form of disambiguation". Where is this policy set out? Can you imagine renaming say, Edge Hill, Liverpool to Edge Hill, Lancashire simply because it falls within the boundaries of the old county of Lancashire? Daemonic Kangaroo 10:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of articles about city suburbs
Talk:Freemantle

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Harefield, Southampton

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone explain why the articles about the city suburbs have the suffix Hampshire rather than Southampton? e.g. Shirley, Hampshire rather than Shirley, Southampton (which is now a re-direct). As a Shirley resident, I don't consider that I live in Hampshire but rather in the City of Southampton, and I'm proud of it.  On looking at the edit history, most of the articles were re-named in November 2006, with the edit summary "correct form of disambiguation". Where is this policy set out? Can you imagine renaming say, Edge Hill, Liverpool to Edge Hill, Lancashire simply because it falls within the boundaries of the old county of Lancashire? Daemonic Kangaroo 10:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of articles about city suburbs
Talk:Entertainment robot

message: Ludobot redirects here, which doesn't discuss Ludobots per se, and also appears under See also.  I don't know enough about Ludobots to disentangle this. (I came here trying to find out what they are.) --Eliyahu S Talk 09:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ludobot loop
Talk:Phoenix serial killers

message: Should it be noted that Dieteman's friend helped to catch him? If I read it correctly, Horton was very important in the case. --81.233.196.49 (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ron Horton 

message: I'm not sure if the serial rapist would belong in here.  He's attacked four women, killing two of them. ONEder Boy (talk) 16:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Serial rapist 

message: It seems likely that this page was created during the time that the two serial killers in Phoenix were active. Now that suspects have been caught and tried, individual pages for each have been created, Baseline Killer and Serial Shooter. Each of these pages contains much more thorough and up to date information and are more likely to be maintained should circumstances change. I could possibly see keeping this page if Phoenix had more serial killers but at the present I will be bold and redirect this page to Arizona serial killer which in turn should point people to the specific article they are looking for. - Killian441 (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting the article
Talk:George Darling (Peter Pan)

message: I believe that the article should be expanded and that a picture should be included. Angie Y. (talk) 18:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You could do that yourself, if you want to. ;-) Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 15:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion and image
Talk:List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters

message: Hazel dies, aged 32, Is her age true ? 
In the German Version you can't get this information. --AndreaMimi (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazels Death 

message: I have removed the  links for characters such as; Rose, Emily, Edward and Mrs. Bridges. They were all redlinks except for Rose Buck and her main page was only one sentence long and contained less information that her entry on this page does. I have made redirect back to here for all of them. It is unlikely that these would have been expanded or created, and if they are, they can be readded. fr33kman -simpleWP- 14:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed redlink to characters 

message: How would it be known when people died if those times were far in the future of the respective series? What is this information based on? It sounds made up to me, so I removed the suspect dates. Unless a reference is provided it should not be replaced. If some canonical source says otherwise, I apologize, but please provide the relevant reference.72.76.226.140 (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Death Dates

message: ... do the numbers under "first season" and "last season" mean??? There is no explanation whatsoever. Is it their shoe size? Number of deductions on their W-2? I'm glad if it's obvious to some people, but not to everyone. Whatever those numbers are, it needs to be stated, or they need to be deleted.72.76.226.140 (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I think I have it. The series in which they first appeared and last appeared. Very poor headings. I'll alter it. 72.76.226.140 (talk) 13:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What on earth.... ?!?! 

message: I removed the comments below. Maybe someone can make use of them. Josh Milburn (talk) 00:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from article 

message: The composition (grammar, syntax, phrasing, word choice, punctuation, and so on) of this entire article needs a very great deal of work. No, I am not going to do the work myself, so do not suggest it. I learned long ago not to mess with amateur editors on Wikipedia (I am a professional book editor). I am simply pointing out that the text of the article needs a considerable amount of work to lift it above the level of a high school essay attempt. DesertSkies120 (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs editing work
Talk:Alfred Heinz Reumayr

message: This article is out of date.  Apparently he has been extradited but there is nothing on trial or anything.  What happened in the last 2 years or so? RJFJR 21:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of date

message: I only get 676 googles on Reumayr.  nothing on NPR.org or BBC.co.uk (but I have trouble with their internal search engines). We need more and better references. RJFJR 21:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: This article was confusing to read and certainly wasn't neutral. Revised to comply with WP:NPOV. Blue Apocalypse 17:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hardly Neutral

message: This is about tag cleanup.  As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, they will be removed.  This is not a judgement of content.  If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made.  This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:Electrobel

message: The article is currently decent. I fixed it up a bit, formalized the tone etc. But I think it needs attention by a related Wikiproject. I'll check into wikiproject music. Nateland 21:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Added a disambig note for the historic company in Belgium, part of an industrial tradition (Category:History of Belgium). Thanks. Wakari07 (talk) 18:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig