lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Division of Curtin

message: Julie Bishop being a minister under Morrison is only in the technical sense.
When there is a change of prime minister with the same party in power, the new prime minister in the immediate period decide which ministers to keep and which ministers are to go.
Also an opportunity for the ministers themselves if they like to stay or to decide to stand down on their own volition.
For Bishop she took that time to decide that she didn't want to continue as a minister.
Not every minister is able to decide instantaneously to quit when there is a new prime minister as in the case when Kevin Rudd made his comeback in 2013 and the new prime minister has to settle in the job before deciding who he or she wants in his or her ministry.
Bishop should not be noted as a Morrison minister as she wasn't one in a real sense and she certainly isn't listed in the Morrison Ministry.49.3.72.79 (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Good call. Frickeg (talk) 01:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop should not be noted as a Morrison minister
Talk:Division of Hasluck

message: Can this word be found in a written dictionary? Timeshift (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe notionally or the seat being made up by two or more distinctly safe Liberal or Labor areas by voting pasterns that by virtue or similar voter numbers cancel each other out thus making this a notionally marginal seat. Etc.petedavo (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish I could find the actual reference, but one of the analysts was talking about this subject in a radio interview (was actually relating to a Canadian election) and made the distinction between three types of marginal seat - definitionally marginal, true marginal and non-standard marginal. A non-standard marginal is often issues based, goes with the government of the day, and swings very heavily. Quite a few of these in Queensland. A true marginal is probably best characterised by Chisholm or Isaacs, where the seat is capable of swinging as a whole and the seat as a whole is not distinguishable easily into areas. A definitional marginal is not a real marginal in the sense that it is actually two opposing safe seats which almost cancel each other out, and so swings work differently in it. This in part explains why in every election since 1980 (with maybe one or two exceptions during the Hawke years) Swan has been at the closer end of things WA-wise, and actually doesn't swing much at all, as both ends are at capacity one way or another. A quick check of online dictionaries reveals "definitionally" simply means "by definition", and has 37,800 hits on Google as well as 47 hits on aph.gov.au's search facility. BTW there's some suggestion in today's newspaper that the Swan result may be nullified in the courts, because of some questions about literature distributed by post in Rivervale. Interesting, as that was a "blip" on my map. Orderinchaos 00:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW notionally would actually make it incorrect, as any seat at any time that happens to have a certain margin is considered "notionally marginal" for the purposes of the next election, which says nothing special about the characteristics of the seat. Orderinchaos 00:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

text: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22definitionally+marginal%22 - four results. Timeshift (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  definitionally 

message: Commendations to Orderinchaos for reorganising the intro and creating the geography split. It might look easy to a novice, but that sort of effort does chew into one's festive time and is always easier to get wrong than it is to get right.Petedavo talk contributions 03:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography

message: Note that the boundaries for Hasluck have changed since 2014.  Perhaps this page should be updated given there is an election in 2 weeks time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.229.90 (talk) 05:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundaries
Talk:Comanche Wars

message: I am planning on adding a section about the Red River War. I will be drawing from the secondary source "Empire of the Summer Moon" Citation below. 
Gwynne, S.C. (2010) Empire of the summer moon Quanah Parker and the rise and fall of the Comanches, the most powerful Indian Tribe in American history. Old Saybrook, CT: Tantor Audio.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by BBraeden (talk • contribs) 10:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does anyone kno a comanche info website?
I plan on adding information regarding the separate battles that took place during the Comanche Wars as well as information regarding prominent leaders/figures of the war Brkachursky (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Crum, Tom. «Camp Cooper, a Different Look». West Texas Historical Association Yearbook 68 (gennaio 1992): 62–75.
Cruse, J. Brett. «Archeological Investigations at the Battle of Red River Site: New Perspectives on the 1874 Indian Campaign in the Texas Panhandle». Southwestern Historical Quarterly 106, n. 2 (ottobre 2002): 168.
Pekka Hamalainen. The Comanche empire. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
S. C. Gwynne (Samuel C. ). Empire of the summer moon : Quanah Parker and the rise and fall of the Comanches, the most powerful Indian tribe in American history. 1st Scribner hardcover ed.. New York: Scribner, 2010.
William Y. Chalfant (William Young). Dangerous passage : the Santa Fe Trail and the Mexican War. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1994.
———. Without quarter : the Wichita expedition and the fight on Crooked Creek. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
Keefeju (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Norihito, Prince Takamado

message: i doubt seriously that heart failure is what is really meant here. (congestive) heart failure is a chronic illness that pretty much precludes playing squash racquets in the first place. he probably died of acute myocardial infarction, a fatal arrhythmia, etc.Toyokuni3 (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ventricular fibrillation per Japanese sources. --MChew (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heart failure
Talk:Riviera Maya

message: Agree with merge proposal. Older and more properly titled "Riviera Maya" should be the article location, and "Mayan Rivera" should be made into a redirect. -- Infrogmation 00:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completed the merge and redirect of Mayan Riviera into this article, leaving out the more overt tourist brochure puffery in that former article.--cjllw | TALK 02:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I added this link to a graphic road map which in turn has links to destination info and aerial images. gary walten 13:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riviera Maya - locogringo.com map link
Talk:Sacred Steel

message: Shouldn't this have it's own article with these categories:
*Definition of
*origins of
*popularization of
*Crossover into Secular music
*Artists identified with Sacred Steel (such as Robert Randolph)
I'm not qualified to write this but it should be done.Lisapollison 00:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sacred Steel as a music genre?
Talk:Division of Franklin

message: The article says Franklin "is the only non-contiguous federal electoral division in Australia", but it seems that the Division of Fenner is also non-contiguous, covering parts of the Australian Capital Territory and the Jervis Bay Territory that are separated by about 200 km of the divisions of Gilmore and Eden-Monaro. Rupert Clayton (talk) 07:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently it's not the only non-contiguous federal electoral division in Australia
Talk:Fushimi-no-miya

message: Thank you for this list of the succession of princes; it obviously took quite a bit of work. However, the prose paragraph content of this article is quite short, and I wonder if it can be expanded. Also, I had read that all of the secondary branches of the Imperial family were eliminated during the Occupation, which is part of why it would be next to impossible for a princess to marry inside the imperial family without marrying an especially close relative. Is the Fushimi-no-miya line still intact and considered to be "imperial"? LordAmeth 18:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Assessment

message: * Split Fushimi-no-miya into Fushimi-no-miya and Family tree of the extended Japanese line of succession.  If agreed, I {cannot} do the split.  
I want to split the sectionm Fushimi-no-miya#Family Tree into its own article. Cannot do it on my own.
I think this isn't exaclty fitting for the article but it is useful as its own article.  Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 04:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you think it would not be fitting here as is? It seems sensible to me to keep the family tree in the main article on the family, as long as the family article is otherwise so short. Felix QW (talk) 09:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split
Talk:Division of Fenner

message: I have removed 
: although demographic change and alleged voter dissatisfaction with the current member may produce a closer contest in the 2007 federal election.The Australian -  5 March 2007 
from the article.  The reference is insufficiently specific - a link to the article and proper citation should be provided for the reference to stand.  The assertion is speculation and unsubstantiated and in my view strongly breaches several aspects of WP:NOT - specifically 
*Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought
*Wikipedia is not a soapbox - see WP:SOAP for exapansion
*Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - speculation about [future events] must be well documented.
--Golden Wattle  talk 00:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  text removed
Talk:Arisugawa-no-miya

message: * Arisugawa-no-miya Memorial Park.<:ref> in Minato</ref> 
* Kyu-Shiba-rikyu Gardens.<:ref>Edo era garden</ref> 
* Shiba Detached Palace Garden.<:ref> Ōkuba clan garden in Edo, purchased by Imperial Household Agency in 1875</ref>
Maybe a sentence or two about this garden-related material could be/should be incorporated in this article? --Tenmei (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ōkubo gardens in Edo
Talk:Robert Randolph and the Family Band

message: I'd like to see someone qualified add in here a section about Randolph's introduction to the tradition of Sacred Steel Music (church music played on pedal steel) and it's influence on his music.  We do not yet have an article on Sacred Steel (musical tradition) but we should.
:That article appears to have been added in September 2006  Phytism (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sacred Steel tradition

message: Could somebody explain the use of "multicultural" multiple times in this article? It seems out-of-place when talking about a musical group. Are you looking for "eclectic"?
:I agree;  it doesn't make sense.  Unless the editor simply used the wrong word, I suppose its a reference to the demographic make-up of the band...but that hardly seems like something which needs to be noted in the opening sentence.  So I'm taking it out. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 04:34, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multicultural? 

message: I first heard about him on a christian music video show called VideoZone and they ONLY play christian artist so is he one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.136.222 (talk) 16:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian misician?

message: It appears that the article is only about Robert Randolph and not upon the band. The article is poorly written as a biographical piece and fails to cover the band itself, with only a couple of reliable references. Needs a review and probably a rewrite-- or else change the title to Robert Randolph and work on it from that point on.. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article focus is only on Randolph himself 
Talk:Division of Solomon

message: Are those islands to the north meant to be colored green? They're not on the AFC's map, and Google maps suggests they're uninhabited. 81.101.142.39 (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:Italian Air Force

message: Panavia Tornado made in italy ?? there is mistakes in the table , it needs a review i think Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 12:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Italian Tornados were assembled in Caselle, Italy. MilborneOne 20:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table 

message: I have changed "Royal Air Force" to "Regia Aeronautica", as for almost all English-speakers, Royal Air Force explicitly refers to the air force of the United Kingdom.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMarshall (talk • contribs) 10:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Air Force 

message: Italy does not have 74 Typhoons Italy has 39. The rest of the Typhoons have not be deliverd yetRademire (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian EuroFighter Typhoons

message: :Aeronautica Militare → Italian Air Force — Per WP:MILMOS#Units, formations, and bases: "Root pages for the armed forces of a state are named, if the official name is known, by the official name's English translation (for example, "Australian Defence Force"). If the native language name is most commonly used, this should be kept (for example, "Bundeswehr")." I do not believe Aeronautica Militare meets the standard of being "commonly used", and is piped to show the English name in most articles. Note that Italian Air Force already redirects to Aeronautica Militare, and that the army article is at Italian Army. - BilCat (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal

message: :File:RF-104G 3th Wing.jpg Is it well named? Should it be added to this article? Is there a source? --Diwas (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is clumsily named, but it definitely is a 3rd Wing aircraft. See here. Mayor of Yurp (talk) 22:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Should it be moved to :File:RF-104G 3rd Wing.jpg? --Diwas (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't disagree with doing that. Mayor of Yurp (talk) 00:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:RF-104G 3th Wing.jpg 

message: History skips from 1911 to 1923. Italian aviation was quite active in World War I, but you would never know it by this iteration of the article.
Georgejdorner (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what became of World War I? 

message: The AMX was just retired in the Italian Air Force as of today. This probably needs an update 82.10.186.58 (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to this page
Talk:Surrey Police

message: The list of stations is wrong.
In Elmbridge, there are two more stations: Walton-On-Thames and Molesey. Spelthorne also has one in Ashford and one in Sunbury.
---
Further to the above, I have updated the statistics to show up to the year 07/08, which is the latest year for which statistics are available (I'm sure it won't be too long before 08/09s become available).  You're Having A Giraffe 20:16 3 May 2009  —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year 2008 stations

message: There is an article on the BBC mentioning a debate between the PCC candidates if anyone's interested:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-20251689
Kookiethebird (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: PCC candidates
Talk:Carl Van Vechten

message: For many years, I have wondered why there are so many Carl Van Vechten photos on so many different articles on Wikipedia.  Does anybody have an explanation?  It's something you can't unsee once you notice it for the first time.  I'm not complaining, as the quality of his photography is great, I just figure there must have been other people taking photos of all these famous midcentury Americans.  24.62.181.69 (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so many Van Vechten photos? 

message: This page was originally titled "Carl van Vechten"; that should be Van; see, e.g. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/vanvechten/ and other references on the page itself. Macspaunday 01:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper-case V in Van 

message: Two essays by Van Vechten, "Duncan Concerts in New York" and "The New Isadora," are included in Isadora Duncan (Ed. Paul Magriel, New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1947). According to the acknowledgments section of this book, both articles were originally printed in the New York Times, and "The New Isadora" appeared in The Merry-Go Round, 1918. I see no mention of Magriel's book on Van Vechten's page.
Cmallea (talk) 17:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Essays on Isadora Duncan not listed in bibliography
Talk:Third Age

message: Shouldn't the game have it's own page?  I am sure it is a little more deserving than a single line is it not?  Tell you what, I will make said page and delete the line. - KaoBear(talk) 01:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOTR:  The Third Age RPG Game 

message: It might be worth a mention somewhere that in the movie, Elrond says to Gandalf (referring to the war where Sauron lost the ring) "I was there seven thousand years ago". Which is clearly in conflict with the book, where the third age took ~3000 years, not 7000. --Mithcoriel (talk) 11:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  He says 3000. You must have misheard him. It is confusing all those elves having aussie accents ;-) Carl Sixsmith (talk) 11:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie comment
Talk:ISOFT

message: iSOFT has 2 bidders.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.95.229.132 (talk) 09:52, August 22, 2007 (UTC) 
I've added the ADVERT template because this reads like a dump from the website.  I can't do any more because I'm employed by a company with a close association to iSoft and I don't want to create the appearance of a conflict of interest.  However, this is a relatively important company in its space and it really deserves something more for its Wikipedia page.  If anyone wants to take that and run with it, please do. Eric TF Bat (talk) 10:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ISOFT has to be one of the nominees for the most spectacular corporate failure in history.  New category required "spectacular corporate incompetent failure"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.71.24 (talk) 02:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for new web page "Huge Corporate Failures" 

message: ISoft is a criminal front organisation which perpetuated the hugest fraud in corporate history against the UK NHS.  4 Directors have been tried so far. The article requires expanding to address the great ISOFT fraud.  Maybe a link to article group 'corporate fraud'.
"Adrian Stevens, the UK managing director of NHS software supplier iSoft, says that people have been unrealistic about how long major IT programmes take to deliver.".  This man is lying -- these people are crooks.  It is only the ongoing mismanagement of the NPfIT which enables these criminals to continue getting away with it.  Re: "Should this IT project take longer to finish than Brunel's Great Western Railway?"  http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/the-tony-collins-blog/2010/11/isoft-has-pledged-to-invest/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.16.225 (talk) 10:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISOFT Fraud 

message: iSoft was included validly on the lists of corporate and accounting scandal. Someone without explanation reverted those edits.  Why the reverts? The iSoft fraud is greater (and more current) than many on the lists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_corporate_scandals
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Accounting_scandals —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.228.143 (talk) 10:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism of articles 

message: Perhaps we should create a section that lists all of iSoft products/software? 203.0.173.33 (talk) 08:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software section
Talk:Royal Portrush Golf Club

message: It says it is out of great britain, but northern ireland is part of great britain!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.33.99 (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2007
:Wrong. Northern Ireland is not part of Great Britain; it is part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Britain
Talk:Royal County Down Golf Club

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070610094941/http://www.top100golfcourses.co.uk/htmlsite/productdetails.asp?id=8 https://web.archive.org/web/20070416142323/http://www.golfclubatlas.com/rcd1.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ♠Vami_IV†♠ 00:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Category talk:Australian outlaws

message: Outlaw is a specific term.  Please don't categorise people who have not been declared as outlaws.  For example: Ben Hall, Charlie Gilbert and Johnny Dunn were the first in Australia’s history to be declared ‘outlaws’ by the government. This status was an extreme measure, which meant anyone in the community could shoot them dead. A week after the declaration, Ben Hall was betrayed by a friend who had his sights on the £2,000 reward.   
Only people declared in line with the Felons Apprehension Acts 1865- 1899 (NSW) or equivalent legislation in Victoria and Queensland should be included in this category - for more info see .--Golden Wattle  talk 01:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: guidelines
Talk:St Malachy's Church, Belfast

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
Zyrkon (talk) 01:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Deor (talk) 02:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I found a source attributing the foundation laying to Dr. Cornelius Denvir, Bishop of Down and Connor at the time.  How to resolve?  GreenMacaw (talk) 02:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: foundation stone laying