lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Economic effects of Hurricane Katrina

message: Material on this page was taken from the Hurricane Katrina article, where the edit history has ben preserved. -- BD2412 talk 14:38, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: Are links really needed for each one of the casinos? Professor water 15:07, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Given their closeness in time and location, it strikes me that it will soon become difficult to separate the respective economic, political, and social effects of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. How would my fellow editors feel about moving the articles covering these aspects to Economic effects of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, Political effects of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, and Social effects of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season? -- BD2412 talk 00:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of effects. 

message: Fix inaccuracies, add some pictures, add sources. Jdorje 02:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo 

message: The article has been cleaned up, a few dead links have been removed, and I paraphrased the section on economic effects in the main Hurricane Katrina article as well. Dr. Cash 23:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the article is now in much better shape. Great job! Titoxd(?!? - help us) 21:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:County Route G2 (California)

message: I am a native of Santa Clara County, and I use Lawrence Expressway every day, but the section about the I-280/Stevens Creek interchange seems a little confusing to me. Maybe we could provide a map?...ςפקιДИτς 14:40, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
:here's a link to a map.  Gentgeen 02:04, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stevens Creek/I-280

message: I heard a Rumor of this being an old creek, which was turned into an expressway. Is this true?
:Doubtful. It is parallel to Saratoga Creek, but it's too close to it to have been a former creek itself. Gateman1997 04:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumor of this being a creek? 

message: the original fry's electronics was located near oakmead parkway and lakeside drive. it was only moved to arques later on  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.76.109.12 (talk) 11:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).   Gentgeen (talk) 11:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  fry's
Talk:Sakthan Thampuran

message: --Kjrajesh 14:44, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

message: it says here that he crushed feudal lords....were these feudal lords Nairs?
58.104.101.99 07:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've just finished with some copy-editing.--Kojozone (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-editing 

message: The file :File:Shakthan-Thampran.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Shakthan-Thampran.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 18:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Shakthan-Thampran.jpg]]
Talk:Al-Aimmah Bridge

message: AFP: Al-Aaimmah bridge or al-Aaimmah bridge
Reuters: the A'imma bridge
The New York Times: the Aimma Bridge
AP: the al-Aima Bridge
BGN: [the?] Jisr al A’immah
:google maps Aa'mah bridge.  It is nonsensical for the English article to begin  "The Al-Aaimmah bridge..." which unnecessarily stutters "the the ..." GregKaye 20:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Transliterations

message: Leo1pard (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views
Talk:HMS Macedonian

message: POV
The comparison of the broadside weights of metal is done in such a way to imply  that the victory of the United States over the Macedonian was soley due to the disparity in cannon size. Both ships were classed as frigates. British ships of the period habitually took on larger opponents and won.  Decatur used his ship's advantages tactically and beat Carden - this was the true cause for the taking of the Macedonian.  While USS United States had heavier guns, that by no means assured victory.  Please reference HMS Speedy vs El Gamo for what may be the most famous example of a much smaller warship taking on a larger opponant and winning handily.
I added one sentence to the article 'She was also ably commanded by Stephen Decatur.'  I believe this corrects the potential POV issue.  There is an article here on Decatur.  Could someone more computer able then I link to the name?
:Probably the most judicious way to phrase is to mention both broadside weight and tactical skill, but not to draw a firm conclusion either way, at most quoting naval historians that have ventured an opinion (Mackay says Macedonian "never had a chance" based on weights alone, for instance). We don't need another Decatur link, got one a couple paragraphs above due to their meeting at dinner. Stan 21:27, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of sports clichés

message: *It's just happy to be here. Wahkeenah 12:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This may not be something you care about, but  and  once again show plenty of examples of sources that should be used to fix this article.  FrozenPurpleCube 14:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod removal 

message: I replaced all the cliches, and replaced them with referenced cliches.  A bunch of the ones I removed were good ones.  Here's a link to old cliches.  Please find refs for them and readd them.  Thanks. - Peregrine Fisher 19:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement of all cliches 
Talk:Pierre Louÿs

message: The page formerly at Pierre Louÿs which was used as a source for this article has been moved to Pierre Louÿs/history. --cesarb 15:57, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge source

message: The picture on this page is also described on other sites and google images as being a photograph of English poet Lionel Johnson... Who is it?
It's not Lionel Johnson. P0mbal (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I'm not enough of an expert to contribute the necessary paragraph myself, but shouldn't there be something about his photography?Mikeindex (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photography 

message: How did he die ? -- Beardo (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Template talk:Battle of Normandy

message: Why does Pointe du Hoc get its own entry as a 'landing point' and not some of the other small landings? Would it not be simpler to restrict the landing points to the five main beaches? DJ Clayworth 16:06, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: could someone link The Battle of Normandy leaders into the template, if they think it belongs there? I'm too chicken to do it myself.... --Alvestrand 21:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Normandy leaders? 

message: it lacks all fights of the french resistance... what about the famous Maquis des Glières, :fr:Maquis du Vercors? and french resistance vs german battles like the :fr:Bataille du Mont Gargan (Battle of Mont Gargan) involving the 2nd SS Division Das Reich. Paris By Night 14:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it is likely due to Americans editing this template.  I am sure that it is not biased by design.  Please feel free to add to this template the battles you are referring to.  I would expect that the users would appreciate such an addition. Odcdtd45 14:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! I am the original designer and this template still looks pretty much the same as when I created it. Regarding the us-uk bias I must state that this was certainly not my intention. I am from Sweden, and we were neutral..:) So, I also suggest that people who want to include resistance stuff are bold and do so, in reasonable proportion. My regards, --Dna-Dennis talk - contribs 01:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: this is an awfully us-uk biaised view

message: I have updated the template to link to a few more operations, which were missed including a few UK and Candians ones as well as the only German one that i know of.
I have removed some of the towns as well as they are covered in some of the other articles i.e. Caen
--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Can someone please convert this to collabsible form?  I'd do it myself, but I really don't have sufficient knowledge of navbox construction, and I'm afraid I'd screw it up. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert to collapsible
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sean Wright

message: Considering YOU - Connor Wolf - began the Sean Wright page on Wikipedia, I find your argument rather hollow and confused. As can be seen from the list of edits and discussions, this article has developed in the spirit of neutrality. Sean Wright
Right, once and for all you blithering idiot, I did not begin the Sean Wright page on Wikipedia. The page was created by an anonymous user; I don't know who. I simply maintained the page, restoring it to its original form because I thought it better than your (vastly) illerate attempt at patting your own back. I admit I read the reviews and found them to be bloody hilarious. Anyway, even while it's obvious you can't write, I never would have thought that you can't read either. I've repeatedly said that I did not create this article. I'm honest, in that respect. More honesty in my little finger than you could claim. I'm not Dan Briggs or the other guy, John, I think his name was, and they have no affiliation with Connor Wolf. I only know you through the British Fantasy Society website, specifically its thread on whether your publishing company was legitimate or not. I'm quite capable of doing my own investigation without your paranoias running riot. Connor Wolf 15:39, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Vampire watermelon/Archive

message: Thanks to User:Auric The Rad who first perpetrated this juvenile imposition. Thanks to the editors who voted to keep it, when Jwrosenzweig attempted to delete it. Thanks to irresponsible editors like ke4roh, who have succeeded in keeping some doubt alive in the minds of the naive. Thanks to the ongoing sententious claptrap of Eequor, who tried to make editors feel guilty at doubting Islamic Romanies who believed in Christmas, etc. In Wikipedia's transparency, everone's genuine nature shines forth. Wetman 21:55, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks to...

message: Now I know I have just discovered this article today and lots of angst has already happened over it, but it seems to me that the title is a little inaccurate.  It's about melons and pumpkins, not exclusively watermelons.  The title "vampire watermelon" also sounds extra silly and probably adds to the ridicule surrounding the article.  Why not Vampire vegetables, or Vampire fruit?  (I know, those are silly too, but perhaps not quite as silly).  I don't know enough to say if I think these sources are credible or not, but I do think the page should be moved to a more accurate title.  Fishal 04:07, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: If we want to be absolutely correct, this article should probably be merged with Vampire. It's part of a body of hard-to-stomach vampire beliefs that should go all together. (Coincidentally, someone just added a mention of the vampire agricultural tools, which are supported by my source, but the wording could be a bit less sensational.) For historical reasons, however, I believe the title should stand. - mako 11:37, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Duralumin

message: "Its composition and heat treatment were a wartime secret. "
Which war ?   This sentence comes after the story about the Hindenburg.   But it says the product use spread through the aircraft industry in 1930's.    Was it a secret in WW1 or 2 ?Eregli bob (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither. It was a commercial secret before WW1 (which implied treatment as a state military secret), but it had already become known outside Germany before the outbreak of WW1. The alloy can be determined by inspection and the heat treatment is pretty simple - age-hardening behaviour (unlike Hiduminium) is just something that will happen automatically, once you happen across the right alloy. Yet during WW1 it was little used by the Allies. Again, it was handed over as part of post-WW1 reparations, along with some airships, and yet it was still little used by the Allies. The odd part isn't that Duralumin was unknown or unused, but that aluminium alloys just weren't used (outside airships) for the sort of rolled strip applications for which Duralumin was useful. When it was eventually used like this, Duralumin was known and used. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A search of early Flight articles featuring Duralumin here:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.215.105 (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  which war ? 

message: Purchased a "Stronglight Dural 5083 9/10 Speed Chainring" AUG 2020 - they're using "Dural" to refer to products in their line made with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5083_aluminium_alloy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.26.182 (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current use 

message: it was also used in the wing spars of the a6m zero 2600:1700:6CC1:2A70:107F:8083:A806:C0B1 (talk) 17:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mitsubishi A6M Zero says most of the Zero was made of a new Extra Super Duralumin alloy (now 7075 aluminium alloy). - Rod57 (talk) 17:26, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese use in WWII Zero fighter 

message: Although there might be reason to consider Dürener the origin of the prefix Dur i always thought it came from Dur like hard in latin. So it would be a "hard" alumin. 95.33.171.105 (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dur
Talk:Middle school

message: American grade systems ( and any other that you find) should be explained for what age they contain to remove ambiguity for non-americans like me. Aquataris (talk) 06:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole U.S. section is a mess to read, in my opinion. I propose rewriting it to make it clearer  Ottoump (talk) 07:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Yes, they should...one of the reasons, though, that sections about schooling in the US is there is no national standard - education is almost entirely left up to the individual states. and while there are rough similarities nationwide (and to a lesser extent with Canada as well), there can also be some fairly marked variations between what one state does and what another state does. (and then there's also what is done in places like Amish country, where German (but called Dutch) is the language and 1648 would apppear to be the year) Firejuggler86 (talk) 02:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Grades
Talk:Mu'allaqat

message: The entire article is problematic and almost entirely without sources, but lines such as "This cautious scholar is unquestionably right in rejecting a story so utterly unauthenticated." are particularly egregious.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.244.191 (talk) 05:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: This article is written like a Wikipedia source rather than a Wikipedia article. Moaz786 (talk) 03:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Essay-like
Talk:Thomas Palaiologos

message: The start text (2 September 2005) of this article came from article Demetrius Palaeologus which at that time was Thomas and Demetrius Palaeologus Arrigo 16:43, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The discussion for this move request is undergoing, as well as other similar requests, in Talk:List of Byzantine Emperors. Please go there to discuss the move request.--Panairjdde 22:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The debate on the move is now completed; the result was no consensus. Mangojuicetalk 20:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Michigan

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Trinity Health (Livonia, Michigan)#Requested move 10 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 02:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Trinity Health (Livonia, Michigan)#Requested move 10 March 2024]] 

message: Hello all, the General Motors EV1 page is up for a good article nomination if anybody would like to initiate the review. Best,  750h+ | Talk  03:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination for [[General Motors EV1]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chaldean Mafia#Requested move 13 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 06:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Chaldean Mafia#Requested move 13 April 2024]] 

message: You are invited to comment on the featured article candidacy for Blackrocks Brewery at this link. Ed [talk] [OMT] 05:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC for Blackrocks Brewery
Talk:Al Campanis

message: There does not seem to be any problem with this article's style. Could someone explain why it is up for copy editing?
I submitted the article for editing. If you check the history, you'll see the great majority of it was written very casually -- it read a lot like a high-school social-studies assignment. That content appears to have been removed, but I'll leave the notice up, because there was some interesting detail in there that maybe someone would like to add back in a more appropriate format. --Masterofzen 06:52, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: I have added the word "allegedly" in front of "racist remarks" near the beginning of the article.  It is possible to give Campanis' remarks a non-racist meaning.  Some people may have the ability to be good players but not manager or front-office material, and this is true whether they are white, black, or green.  As for the "buoyancy" remark, a person is either buoyant or not, and pointing that out is not necessarily racist. John Paul Parks (talk) 03:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Racist Remark" is POV 

message: Upon researching some history of Kos, I have some concerns that Campanis is listed as being born in Greece. Campanis was born in 1916 in Kos, when the Dodecanese were under Italian rule. Prior to 1912, the islands were under Ottoman rule. The islands were not formally united with Greece until 1947. I believe the birthplace should be corrected to reflect history. Flibirigit (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Campanis really born in Greece?
Talk:Organizational ecology

message: shouldn't this be at Organizational ecology, as per the naming convention?  Guettarda 17:03, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Several of the links lead to other people, such as Freeman, Hannan, Wade and Henderson. 89.131.19.138 (talk) 22:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  links not correct 

message: Given the title of this page it must include the works of Trist and Emery on their development of the 'organizational ecology'-concept. E.g. E.L. Trist, A Concept of Organizational Ecology, Australian Journal of Management 2 (2) (1977) 161-175.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.48.50.238 (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing reference to Tavistock
Talk:Bruce Lehman

message: I have no higher regard for Mr. Lehman's actions than the authors of this piece (as it stands today), but the lead paragraph is quite obviously very far from a neutral point of view.Bryan 22:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Cayden Boyd

message: In the circumstances I'm convinced that the result would have been keep, so I am not going to relist, but if someone else disagrees then please do relist it yourself, citing this inconclusive discussion. --Tony SidawayTalk 17:11, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Queen's Journal

message: The Queen's Journal began publication in 1875 -- but the Dalhousie Gazette began publication in 1868, making it Canada's oldest student newspaper, and one of the oldest in North America -- not the Queen's paper.
:Theres a lot of confusion here, the varsity wiki says it is the second oldest, which does not agree with what you say either, no references... PretentiousSnot (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Mobile Bay

message: What is the justification for the use of the words apocryphal and allegedly regarding the "Damn the torpedoes" quote?  As far as I can tell from my brief research, most sources indicate that those were his orders.  198.112.236.6 17:22, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He said "Go on, Drayton.  Damn the torpedoes, go on!"  This was later changed to the near-legendary "Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead!"  Carajou 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The most thorough and comprehensive study of the battle concluded that Farragut never uttered the famous words or their equivalent; they first appeared in an account some ten years after the battle, and thereafter appeared in various forms.  See Friend, Jack, West Wind, Flood Tide : the Battle of Mobile Bay (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press 2004), .   4.249.96.86 (talk) 14:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Damn the torpedoes

message: The previous pic, a Currier and Ives lithograph, showed the battle between CSS Tennessee and five monitors.  There were four monitors total in this operation, and one of them, USS Tecumseh, was sunk by a torpedo before all of the vessels involved exchanged fire.  Carajou 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic change

message: Edited the section about the story of Farragut being lashed to the mast to take out some editorial commentary suggesting that people would tend to interpret that as him vowing to go down with the ship when actually he was tied there because he was up to view the battle and otherwise could have fallen and died.
Maybe if there was some cite to someone having the mistaken view?  I personally don't find the idea of a commanding Admiral being tied to the mast to command a battle where they famously ran dangerous minefields to be in any way "prosaic" as the comment said.  Took out commentary either way about the level of romance of the motivation. 63.209.178.11 (talk) 01:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lashing to mast
Talk:Calalzo di Cadore

message: Hi!
Do not delete! I am the author of the Italian edition of this page (compare the IP). I authorize for the translation. Thank you!
:It is en Wikpedia policy to not allow untranslated cut-pastes from other Wikipedias. See WP:CSD. I don't know what the article is about, as I don't read Italian, but I am sure it would be welcome if it was translated. Thue | talk 18:23, 2 September 2005 (UTC)