lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Galindian language

message: These two languages are unrelated to each other and should not be grouped into one article. I propose that this article be split into two articles, "West Galindian language" and "East Galindian language". The same goes for this article's sister article, "Galindians", see its split discussion here. – Treetoes023 (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - West Galindians were of the West Baltic language group and the East Galindians were of the East Baltic language group, so their languages, which belonged to different language groups, merit separate articles. Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal
Talk:Catherine of Aragon

message: Relatively recently an edit was made in her title to suggest her actual historical name was Catharina and the source provided is from 1691. While I won't edit it out, there are several sources from the late 1400s and early 1500s that invariably refer to her and women of the same name as either Catalina or Cathalina, not Catharina. Many of the original manuscripts can be found in this archive: https://pares.mcu.es/ParesBusquedas20/catalogo/find?nm=&texto=catalina+de+aragon Reicastell (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her name in historical Spanish which was supposedly Catharina 

message: Please add the category :Category:Mothers of monarchs. 2601:249:9301:D570:9012:4870:54CD:5F95 (talk) 23:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Liu1126 (talk) 01:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Talk:Moral core

message: I suspect that this article is written by someone who thinks that, because he or she has a theory about something called a "moral core," therefore Wikipedia should have an article with that title, introducing his theory.
I think we should probably get rid of this article.  Discussion? --Larry Sanger
: I would first give the author a chance to name and describe which theories (and developed by who) rely on this notion, and also name who exactly "presumes" that the moral core is epigenetic (and why they simply presume it and do not support the claim with arguments).  If the wuthor can do this it might be a valid article -- otherwise, I would agree with you, Slrubenstein
::There is no such thing as moral fiber or moral instinct?  Do we not protect our fellows, our children?  That seems foolish, of course such a thing exists.  Change it's title, and remove the claim of some biological or genetic basis, that is reasonable.  But ignore the innate nature of morality?  Hasty indeed. EntmootsOfTrolls
----
Is this page still in dispute? Now it seems NPOV... (I'd like to remove boilerplate) Przepla 22:33, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody's objected in the past five months, I'm going to follow through on that. Removing NPOV dispute header. Bryan 01:48, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: http://www.naswnyc.org/d23.html
This link gives at least a decent explanation of one perspective on what is meant by this unusual term. --Michael Snow 21:06, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  A source
Talk:Valence, Drôme

message: Is there any thing else which needs merging? Jezhotwells (talk) 13:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of Libélo 

message: I think my head’s spinning. ELSchissel (talk) 13:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this page redirect to itself?
Talk:Orion

message: *Project Orion (disambiguation) should be listed in the see also -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 23:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: UPS is using a computer platform called Orion ...
: Headline-1: At UPS, the Algorithm Is the Driver
* http://www.wsj.com/articles/at-ups-the-algorithm-is-the-driver-1424136536?mod=WSJ_hp_RightTopStories
QUOTE: "UPS is using a computer platform called Orion—which is 10 years and hundreds of millions of dollars in the making—to help sort through an almost infinite number of options to make delivery routes more efficient." -- AstroU (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the headline should say, "...the Algorithm Includes the Driver" -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:    Yes, it's a headline (and a silly, ambiguous one). I for one am assuming you-all mean "We're amused", and hoping your critique is there as comic relief from editing -- i.e., without any request for either elucidation nor replacement. (If not, let us know!)--Jerzy•t 18:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New NEWS today, for future editing 

message: Topics like Project Orion and Orion of Thebes generally are mentioned as "Orion" only after they have already been mentioned with whichever full phrase distinguishes them from each other and the "plainer" Orions, so this Dab page is used primarily when the user knows that such longer names haven't been invoked. The longer names thus become relevant to the disambiguation process primarily when a subsequent reference has been quoted without inclusion of the first mention -- probably because "Orion" is far from central to the matter our user has seen.   Thus the main body of the Dab page is for references to the various meanings of "Orion", but the "See also" section is available to cover the rarer situations where the user knows Orion is invoked but doesn't actually know that "Project" or "of Thebes" is normally part of the information that would definitively disambiguate. Putting the "Project"- and "of Thebes"-style topics in the "See also" section means that the topics easily recognized using the subject area or other available contextual info get found above "See also", without the user having to plow thru any of the phrases-mentioning-"Orion" topics, and only the users who've already ruled out all the senses that would properly be identified by a longer phrase need plow into the phrases that are longer than the ambiguous term. It is thus that Project Orion (a separate Dab), Orion of Thebes (a bio), and their ilk belong in the "See also" section, and thus that i am moving such entries there from their current positions higher on the page.--Jerzy•t 08:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things not reasonably called "Orion" at first use 

message: There seems to be no information on this book in any article,  nor any article that links (or rather, red-links) to it, thus per wp:Dab, i've removed the Dab entry for the topic.--Jerzy•t 08:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[The Clock of God in Orion]]''
Talk:British nationality law

message: Does the following sentence belong in the introduction of the article?
*
Cordless Larry (talk) 10:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * The Bill of Rights 1689 seems quite constitutional.  The fact that it can be amended or overturned is no big deal because that is the case for most constitutions. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *The term constitution can mean one of two things: the entirety of the laws or just those that can only be changed through a special process other than a vote in parliament. Hence one can speak of the constitution of the UK and also say it has no written constitution. The constitutions of Canada, Australia and New Zealand distinguish between imperial laws that were received into their legal systems and those that were incorporated into their constitutions. The first can be changed by statute, while the second cannot. In R. v Montague 2010 for example, the Ontario Court of Appeal decided that the Bill of Rights 1689 had not been incorporated into the constitution of Canada. TFD (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

text:  Indeed see Dimitry Kochenov (2019) Citizenship ISBN 9780262537797 Kaihsu (talk) 06:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment (RfC; since closed)
Talk:Engineering Research Associates

message: I've added a reference/link to an archive.org edition of the High-speed Computing Devices book, but I notice a couple of issues here:
* The reference I added went into Notes; there's a separate reference in References without the link to the full text. I'm not certain off-hand how to fix this; someone more familair with doing references properly should probably merge the two.
* In the section High-speed Computing Devices there are facts directly referencing the pages of the book that should probably use a proper reference.
Cjs (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''High-speed Computing Devices'' references need cleanup 

message: I don't Wikipedia much lately but I was at the ceremony today to install a new plaque (there was one years ago but it disappeared). Lot of old timers there including Seymour Cray's CFO (I think). I think this is notable and appropriate. Assistance on formatting etc. appreciated. Charles T. Betz (talk) 23:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Equal Rights Amendment

message: A few months ago, the West Virginia Legislature revoked its ERA ratification: 1,2 The article and the map should be updated. I could do the former, time permitting, though someone else will need to do the latter. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that the resolution only passed the Senate. Thus, the article is accurate as it stands right now. My apologies for the mistake. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update: West Virginia Revocation
Talk:Gender neutrality in languages with gendered third-person pronouns

message: There is another option for non-binary people who prefer gender-neutral pronouns in Polish language aside from "onu". It's quite similar - it's "ono" which is also used for kids of unknown gender. It's conjugation is: Ono, onego, onemu, ono, onym, onym.
I just thought I'd add this info because I use this set of pronouns myself and I know many people who also do. I.M.BatCat (talk) 23:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second option for gender-neutral pronouns in Polish 

message: I deleted the sentence about "onu" gaining popularity. Zaimki.pl is a website that propagates using pronouns like "onu" so it's biased, therefore lacks NPOV. 
"Onu" and zaimki.pl also lacks notability, for example, there is no articles about "onu" or zaimki.pl (or even "dukaizmy") in Polish Wikipedia, which is telling something by itself. In English Wikipedia, in article about "onu", you can also find a template telling reader that it is not meeting Wikipedia's general notability guideline.
It is also worth mentioning, that Krytyka Polityczna (other source) is a far-left magazine and web of institutions/activists of such political option. 2A02:A313:4348:D580:E9BE:5EF0:A3B1:153A (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Polish onu gaining popularity" 

message: First- and second-person English pronouns developed organically, hence, they're properly described as "unmarked for gender", not by the recent prescriptionist phrase, "gender-neutral". "Gender neutral" is clearly not taxonomic/descriptive, otherwise, the pronoun, "you" would be described as "case neutral". Also, the generic "he", when the referent or antecedent is a mixed-sex group, though it's identical to its masculine use is properly taxonomised as "common gender", not "masculine", similar to how the German articles "der" and "dem" can be masculine or feminine/masculine or neuter respectively, depending on the case. 
Looking further through the page, any entry for any usage that was current before 1960, before which the prescriptionist "gender neutrality" was not a thing, e. g., "one" as a generic pronoun, should be deleted or at the least "gender neutral" replaced with "common gender" or "unmarked for gender". 185.205.225.132 (talk) 13:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  description of English first- and second-person pronouns as "gender-neutral" 

message: This article is veering all over the place between at least three inconsistent date formats, and needs to be normalized to one, per MOS:DATEVAR. I'm of a mind to impose DMY, since this subject has nothing to do with the US in particular so doesn't seem to have any cause to use MDY.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date format
Talk:Neologism

message: The following recently deleted link is moved here:
* Langmaker.com, a regularly updated directory of over 1,100 invented languages and neographies.
According to the root link, http://www.langmaker.com, the Langmaker website has been "temporarily" disabled.  It is moved here so that it may be checked from time to time to see if it has been re-enabled.  Then it may be added back to the article. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 19:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently deleted link 

message: neological (adjective)
# Of or pertaining to neology
# Of or pertaining to neologicism (modern logicism which accepts the difference between proof, substantiality and experimental axiomatic systems).
2A02:2149:8B83:6500:7813:142C:413A:4290 (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  create page: [[neologicism]] 

message: The current page states "is any newly formed word, term, or phrase that nevertheless has achieved popular or institutional recognition and is becoming accepted into mainstream language". Nevertheless what? It isn't clear even in the initial edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neologism&oldid=1158732740
It's a bit odd that an article around linguistics has held a semantically meaningless summary for a year. I have no formal background in the field and hesitate to correct the grammar as I'm quite certain I'll fall foul of the classic trope. Youse lot generally think ussins need to wise the bap, so I'll houl me wisht.
BeardedChimp (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nevertheless
Talk:Glasgow City Chambers

message: Looks a bit similar to http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A668487 but don't know if this is necessarily a copyright issue - could of course be the  same author - and they might own the copyright anyway - but some guidance/info would help ... Nevilley
Definitely looks like a copyright issue as page has "copyright BBC" (don't know the symbol for "copyright") but seems to be a chat site Tiles 08:17 May 8, 2003 (UTC)
I wrote the h2g2 version, and also added it to Wikipedia - copyright should be okay. User:Berek June 29, 2003
::Is it not noteworthy that it is the largest brick building in Scotland?2.221.73.136 (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flannery O'Connor

message: To revive an old topic, I did a survey of real live Catholics on social media and found that Flannery O'Connor is quite popular amongst American Catholics. Anyone who attends a Catholic university will have been exposed to her in English lit. courses. She is more popular than Greene or Chesterton and neither of those two are as popular as Evelyn Waugh and Walker Percy. Now, when we're talking about popularity, we're talking about popularity within the subset of the population who read literary fiction. The type of Catholic who simps for Trump or whines on social media about the LGPT "agenda" isn't going to know who she is. Pascalulu88 (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity among Catholics 

message: I'm questioning the validity of the information contained within the Career section.  This sounds like an individual's assessment, so I'm wondering whether it's the independent work of the Wikipedia poster or if it can be attributed to a reputable source.  I've asked for a citation on the information. Ghost writer's cat (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four five-year periods of career?
Talk:Great Game

message: The Article comes to Redirect for The Russian Tournament of Shadows, which is the a different Term for the same conflict, however the article fails to mention the term, however It in Fact used to is there any reason for the Term to be Removed? Sir James H. Westwood (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, we are required under to use Use Common Recognizable Names WP:UCRN, of which The Russian Tournament of Shadows is not. Additionally, there is no  source Russian historical document that uses the term Tournament of Shadows. The redirect should be deleted, however that is a difficult process, which I will now embark on. Regards,  William Harris |talk  19:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That redirect no longer exists. Regards,  William Harris |talk  19:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournament of Shadows? 

message: Is the map of modern Central Asia really that instructive? The article also includes information about Persia. Wouldn't it be more useful to use a map from the time with borders representing the period mentioned? Claíomh Solais (talk) 22:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Rotifer

message: I just created the stub article Digononta to fill a gap, but the article Bdelloid references a difference classification than the one I used, and Seison uses a third scheme. Before I start mucking around with these articles, I thought I would see if smoeone who knows more than I do about this could opine on how to bring some consistency to the subject. -- Donald Albury 11:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization of rotifers

message: *History & Taxonomy
**Current taxonomy
**Why Cuvier is listed as the authority for the phyllum
**Some sources list Harris, others list Leewenhoek as the initial discovery, clarify.
**Evolutionary history and phylogeny
**Add cladogram
Neil916 (Talk) 17:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion still to do

message: How is the plural of Rotifer spelled? I see it spelled in the text as rotifers, rotifaers, and rotifiers. I just thought maybe there was a specific single spelling that is correct. Zibem (talk) 22:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct spelling is "rotifers"; the article is now correct in this respect. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural Spelling? 

message: I have updated the taxonomy (via the automatic taxonomy templates "Template:Taxonomy/taxon") to that in , p. 98. This is the last Linnaean classification I can find. The more recent classifications are cladistic, placing Rotifera (reduced to 2 classes), Acanthocephala and Seisonida into one clade, Syndermata, but without consistent Linnaean ranks. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy

message: Talk:Rotifer “The most distinctive feature of rotifers is the presence of a ciliated structure, called the corona, on the head. In the more primitive species, this forms a simple ring of cilia around the mouth from which an additional band of cilia stretches over the back of the head. In the great majority of rotifers, however, this has evolved into a more complex structure.”
This is incorrect. In the rotifer genus Cupelopagis, the corona is NOT ciliated. Males of most rotifers have reduced corona. The most significant feature of rotifers is the presence of mastax in females.
Therefore, I suggest to modify the above lines as: “The two most distinctive features of rotifers (in females of all species) are the presence of corona on the head, a structure generally ciliated and presence of mastax. In the more primitive species, corona forms a simple ring of cilia around the mouth from which an additional band of cilia stretches over the back of the head.”
S.S.S. Sarma (talk) 02:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Distinctive Features

message: Link leads to NYT !
Original link should be to:
Lyubov Shmakova, Stas Malavin, Nataliia Iakovenko, Tatiana Vishnivetskaya, Daniel Shain: A living bdelloid rotifer from 24,000-year-old Arctic permafrost. In: Current Biology. Band 31, Nr. 11, Juni 2021, ISSN 0960-9822, S. R712–R713, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.077.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:6020:B016:7001:A0FC:8A06:A1CB:25F7 (talk) 13:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link "frozen for 24,000 years in the Siberian permafrost.[7]"
Talk:House of Guise

message: It seems to be incorrect to talk about "the Cardinal of Lorraine" or "the Cardinal of Guise". See Talk:Cardinal (Catholicism).
S.
Well in this case Lorraine or Guise is the family name, so I think it's correct, though perhaps Cardinal de Lorraine and Cardinal de Guise would be better.
____
Looks like this was written by a Hugonote from the XVI c. (: I just took out an 'Immensely ambitious' ...   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.87.75.99 (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A Good Map of the Area they controlled or where from, should be included in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.248.117 (talk) 06:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP Needed.
Talk:I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony)

message: This song was first sung for Pepsi, and a year later Coke bought out the rights to the song and stopped playing it.  I remember the song as a child sitting in front of the TV in 1970 or '71.  I'll never forget this great commercial.  It started with one or two nice teenage girls singing the song, and the camera slowly panned out, showing over a hundred teenagers standing on a hilltop, singing.  It was for Pepsi, not Coke, and it ended with the announcer saying, "Join the Pepsi Generation."  What we're watching today on the internet ...if you search for the song on Youtube... is lowlife stuff I don't remember being aired.  However, Coke did make one song, the "Hilltop Song", which was a knockoff of the Pepsi Song.  The real song blew everyone away, it disappeared, and Coke replaced it with their horrible knockoff: The Hilltop Song.  Do you remember?    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Milner  (talk • contribs) 21:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are mistaken. It was a coke commercial, not pepsi. Steve Lowther (talk) 18:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Things go better with Coke" (OG Coke add @ Youtube)  - FlightTime (open channel) 18:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The Pepsi Song

message: This is missing the 1977 Christmas edition and the 1980 Christmas edition of the jingle and TV commercial in the US -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 06:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas editions
Wikipedia talk:Unusual articles

message: In Nova Scotia, there is a place with the street names of "This street","That street",and "the other street", I recommend an article on this to be put here. SpinoAce (talk) 13:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be pushed to WP:Unusual place names. ! Quwoting2 {converse}  13:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: An article already exists on the place, see Porters Lake, Nova Scotia. Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 11:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2024 (2) 

message: Under the subsection for “Society, Economy, and Law” is the name “Varg Vikernes”. The text next to his name reads: “A Norwegian musician that is famous for being the first big stars of the Black Metal music scene in the country, and a guy that had many problems with the law. Both in Norway and later France, the later of wich it was for apperently saying positive things about Nazism.” Please change the text to say: “A Norwegian musician that is famous for being the first big stars of the Black Metal music scene in the country, and a guy that has had many problems with the law, both in Norway and later France, the latter of which was apparently for saying positive things about Nazism.” 2601:1C0:4D7F:87B0:0:0:0:D293 (talk) 04:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: I don't see the name listed on the page, what am I missing? NotAGenious (talk) 08:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2024