Talk:Columbine High School massacre/Archive 1

message: I disagree with the third paragraph of this article. It states that the Columbine High School massacre was the subject of the film Bowling for Columbine, and I think this implies that it was the main topic of it when it fact the film was about US violence in general. The school shooting was just a starting point for the film which was occasionally returned to; this is even the opinion of the Bowling for Columbine article itself, but I don't want to change this paragragh since this seems to be a bit of a PoV issue. -- 212.229.115.84
I agree that people who watched the 'Documentry', came out thinking americans were complete dumbasses, im an engish studant and watched the film in a drama lesson. Most of my class were horrified by the things that were shown,ie: the brother of an Oklahoma bomber holding a gun to his head, is the ownership of guns in america treated in such a light-hearted way? Even when the saftys off?
:I agree with "212.229.115.84" about the fact that the film exploited the Columbine killers as a jumping-off point for Moore's theories on violence in the USA. I also strongly disagree with calling that film a "documentary" since it was filled with many falsehoods and deceptive editing. Every main-stream published review of that film I have read contains many verifyably false statements and remarkably, these reviewers all seemed to have come up with the same false beliefs from seeing the film. Everyone I know personally who saw the film (who had not already been warned of the deceptions in the film) came away with exactly the same false impressions. Moore systematically tricked the media and the public by various deceptive methods, not to mention the outright lies he told to the various people he used in the film. Libdemplus
I think the paragraph is accurate. The film used the issue of the massacre to highlight the broader issue of gun availability in the US. (But then we Europeans do think the US approach to guns is nuts. A Californian friend on a visit to Ireland could not believe that the police are unarmed, nobody he met had even seen a gun, women regularly walked home through the city alone. And that a city the size of Dublin had less shootings in a year than his neighbourhood had in 9 days. So no wonder Europeans think American gun laws nutty.) ÉÍREman 07:34 Apr 20, 2003 (UTC) PS that Californian got his first gun aged 11!
----
Added second paragraph correcting the Cassie Bernall story.  Feel free to move both paragraphs to their own page if you want to add more.  I think there is already too much to be located on the page about Columbine, I don't want it to overshadow the other content by picking apart a tiny incident.
----
How could the gunman have been inspired by the film The Matrix when it hadn't even come out yet? I think the editor who add that details was confusing the Columbine massacre with another slaying by a teenager called "The Matrix murders" Shall I delete this part? Kricxjo 07:57, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bowling for Columbine Reference 

message: The aricle states Harris and Klebold, as well as a few other friends had formed a small club known as the "Trenchcoat Mafia", but as far as I know they may have been called that, but they neither founded, nor was they members of the Trenchcoat Mafia. The actual members of the Trenchcoat Mafia had actually left the school years earlier. // Liftarn
----
Obvious why 'provoked' gets quotes, as they may not have been provoked at all. Far from clear why 'done' gets a quote. DJ Clayworth 15:29, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trenchcoat Mafia? 

message: Shouldn't she get her own article? I think that the Bernall stuff should be moved. WhisperToMe 09:25, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassie Bernall 

message: Should links to the "impact" be added as well ? (I distinctly remember reading Voices from the Hellmouth and the continuations thereof in the aftermath, and think they are relevant in relation to the moral panic mentioned in the article. Any objections ? Eike 04:58, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC)
----
It seems to me that the material in the recent Slate article is important and someone with interest in the subject should go through it.  Don't miss the sidebar linked from the third paragraph. --Zero 03:35, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: # To which 16 minutes do this section heading refer?  I don't see an obvious span of time that corresponds.
# In two different places in this section there are references to there being 900 and 448 students in the cafeteria.  Which is correct?  (Perhaps one is an estimate by the shooters, the other an actual count?)
Can someone who knows more about this incident correct and/or clarify? AHM 04:51, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions re. "16 minutes of terror" 

message: In addition to musicians Marilyn Manson and Rammstein, the German-industrial band KMFDM and the rap group Insane Clown Posse received quite a bit of criticism.  Especially KMFDM--the shooters had lyrics to KMFDM songs on the website and the shooting coincidentally occurred on the release date of the album Adios.  KMFDM's frontman released a statement to the press the day following the massacre, expressing his own grief at the shooting, while emphasising that his band does not support violence or Nazism.  See the KMFDM article for more info.  I'd incorporate this info into the article myself, but I figure I should leave that to the more "pro" editors. :) --68.13.248.151 18:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. buck 22:45, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Musicians as "Scapegoats" 

message: The opening paragraph should be snappy and high-impact, but instead this one was cluttered with incidental information. The massacre is correctly associated with Littleton, Colorado. If it's precise location is in an unicorporated segment of Jefferson County, equidistant from Littleton and Denver, that's fine: but that's too clunky and boring to stick in the opening para. Put it in later in the article. Same goes with the parenthetical clause about it being the second worse attack on a school in U.S. history. Again, that's fine and important, but the fact that it is considered the worst school shooting in U.S. history is more pertinent in the opening paragraph, and the "oomph" of the information is mitigated by interrupting the sentence to add the other info. I know, of course, that people have worked hard on the article (and it definitely shows, it's fascinating reading), so I won't be at all offended if you totally disagree with me and revert my changes. But if not, then there are some other changes I'd like to make, too. I'll wait for some feedback first. Babajobu 22:40, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening paragraph

message: Hi guys, I've just been copy editing this extremely informative article. It's obvious that a lot of work went into it. I'm just doing clean up work, if you will; in the course of this I've placed some embedded questions and such—I don't mean to be terse or anything, it's just a convenient way of asking questions right next to the area of concern. Thanks, and congrats!—encephalonὲγκέφαλον  11:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: Columbine High School is grammatically correct as it is a proper noun; it is named for Columbine High School, not a Columbine high school. Why should "massacre" be capitalised? 24ip | lolol 01:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Case

message: I detect a slight pro-christian bias to this article, particularly the part about the "martyrdom". I believe since this is unsubstantiated, it should be removed. Of course, I could be wrong. -- Dantecubed 02:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-christian bias? 

message: The three sections after Victims need to be copy edited, especially Aftershock. Anyone up for it?—encephalonέγκέφαλον 03:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: The bush/cheney thing was pretty creative.
lol71.98.16.172 08:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Okay, the page is getting repeatedly vandalized by the same idiot with the same picture. Can some admin please just delete the picture he keeps linking to?
:Okay, now there's two of them, with two different (both inappropriate) pictures. PLEASE, SOMEONE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS. --Matt Yeager 05:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't protect the main page featured articles. See user:Raul654/protection →Raul654 08:11, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Everyone's going to hate me for writing this about such a sensitive topic, but...
Why did the boys time the attack for April 20, which was Adolf Hitler's birthday? Wouldn't April 30, Hitler's day of death, been more appropriate? — JIP | Talk 18:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the theory has something to do with them being delayed in building the propane bombs and getting ready, it wasn't that they had other plans, more that their plan couldn't be fulfilled on cet date. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 22:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of the massacre 

message: I find the accusation based on Till Lindemann's rolling Teutonic R's preposterous. He's German, right? That's how he talks. Should we condemn the whole population of Germany, the whole population of Austria, and a significant part of the population of Switzerland while we're at it? — JIP | Talk 18:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Such claims are a common fixture of the Religious Right. [User:Ceejayoz|ceejayoz]] 22:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

text: —Please remember NPOV-such details are not only offensive to or "used" by the religious right.-Music2006
Talking like that has nothing to do with being German. Believe it or not, Till Lindemann doesn't talk like he sings. Neither do any other Germans talk that way, and neither did Hitler (off stage). Till obviously has a very clear artistic purpose in doing so.
I don't think the paragraph is POV, though. The very comment about "Teutonic Rs" is of course absolutely ridiculous and shows very well that this was an overreaction from extremist religious groups that have no idea what they're talking about. That's not POV, that's simply stating the obvious. If anybody from these religious groups gets offended by the paragraph as it stands now, it's like George Bush being offended by someone pointing out to him that he's a Republican. If anyone should be offended, it's the artists who were wrongfully accused. --dllu 11:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Till Lindemann 

message: We are told that Harris had a messianic-level superiority complex in the Aftermath etc section. Is this a techical term for or not, and if not, it should probably be replaced with something more appropriate. Perhaps a reference to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Hydraton31 00:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Term? 

message: This artice doesn't really delve into the question of why they did it. It just brings up video games and movies and such (which, by the way, are approved to be released by government regulations).
One statement on this article said that Harris and Kelibold were not loners, and had many friends. The statement had a notation. But if this were true, why haven't their many friends disclosed some insight into why they did this? In addition, it just doesn't make sense that people with many friends will be so angry with the world that they'd start murdering people and then commit suicide. Instead, they'd be more postive people because they'd be happy with the good times and companionship shared with their friends.
It's strange how no one (outside of Micheal Moore, assumptive idiots who aren't educated in psychology/sociology, and religious crusaders) have seriously and throughly attempted to pinpoint the underlying problematic sociological factors that have helped cause this event. Apparently there's something wrong in the United States when youth, who should be  fundamentally optimistic, decide to start murdering many people and then subsequently kill themselves. -Usernamefortonyd
::Nobody knows exactly why...It'll never be known because the only two people who can explain why they did it are dead.  It may not make sense to you, but the fact of the matter is that it happened...Having friends doesn't make everybody happy, and the fact that they had friends and did what they did is proof of that...Maybe that's why they did it, because they were misunderstood by people with thinking such as your's. Rzrscm 03:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: off topic, but can you beleive there is a columbine video game... super columbine rpg -- {{Subst:unsigned|67.149.119.110 )
Why not Stay on Topic, instead. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 03:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  off topic 

message: 12. PSYCHIATRIC DRUG CORRELATION
This and many other episodes of violence seen in American society are almost ALWAYS seen to have links with psychiatric drugs. Either the individuals and perpetrators are on them or WERE on them. This has been proven time and again through investigation.
There needs to be more written on the immense implication of the link between drugging children and young adults and the connection that American and other western and biochemical-psychiatry-influenced people have with violence and behaviour. 
Not just in the anecdotal sense, but in the broad ontological sense, these things portend an enormous issue to individuals and the global society.
:Back up your claims. — ceejayoz ★ 22:50, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the Columbine massacre, not about the correalation between psychiatrict drugs and the massacre.  This topic deserves mention, and it is mentioned, as well as linked to a webpage dealing with that topic in detail, but the article doesn't need anymore than a paragraph or so on the topic since it's about the actual event of the massacre.  If you want to start a page on links between school shooters and psychiatric drugs, you can do that and then add a link to that new page onto this article, but adding a whole elaborate section on that topic to this article would be wrong.  If we were to do that, we should just add the entire Cassie Bernall article which was removed and given its own page for the same reason.  BTW, there's no need to be hostile.  PRueda29 22:29, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Having been prescribed anti-depresants before, and then having to go through withdrawl, I agree with you.  I don't believe pills help anyone when it comes to psychology, but this is only my opinion; others might disagree.  If you'd like, add a bit more information to the portion about Eric Harris and Luvox, but try not to make it anymore than two or three paragraphs; also, give it its own category by puting ===Title=== as its title underneath the portion about journals and videos.  Try not to deviate from Columbine and Eric Harris as it is the central topic unless you're comparing it to other massacres, such as the one in Springfield, Oregon or Red Lake, Minnesota.  I'm not going to trim down or delete what you wrote since its part of a discussion and doing that would preven others from inputting their opinions, but if you'd like you can trim it down a bit yourself.  PRueda29 04:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One more thing: create an account, it's free! PRueda29 04:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmaceutical discussion 

message: People often talk about the Trenchcoat Mafia, the nick name for the Columbine High School Audio Visual club if memory serves me, when they talk about the Columbine Tragedy.
What they don't understand is the truth.
They see the news, they react, they panic, they fear, they question those who do not fit the mold, and ostricise that which they do not understand.  These people are part of the "Kneejerk Mafia".  That group of modern day villagers with tourches and pitchforks looking for monsters to chase out of town, witches to burn, and abominations to be used as effigies for their hatred.
While I agree 100% that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold had planed how they would end their lifes and the lives of fifteen other people at school, they did not plan for the possible outcomes of what would happen durring the aftermath of the chaos that they caused.
I would like share my story of what happened to myself because of the actions by two boys of my age, of my interest of mathematics, science, movies, industrial music, and computer programming and taking the same medications at the time.
The following day, April 21, 1999, I was attending my biology class where we discussed about the events that occured less than twenty-four hours ago.  We were also watching students at the high school that I knew nothing about, not even where it was or the type of people who lived in the city of which the incident occured.
I asked a question that I still remember to this day, because I was shocked by the outcome of what people had though of me.  I asked my science teacher "What kind of person would do something so horrible, so evil, so condisending that they would resort to this violence." My teacher replied "[girl's name] said that you would do such a thing."
I found the response to be quite offensive.  I was shocked.  I had friends.  Even though I am a fan of Rammstien, and went at the Papal Youth Gathering that occured in my home town of St. Louis earilier that year.  So basically, I knew for certain my preference of music and my faith had nothing to do with why that personl said thouse things.  Even without the anti-depressants, I never once contemplated suicide and did not have any interest whatsoever of doing so.  To me the idea of taking your own life sounded pretty rediculous.  I only took anti-depressents because of the panic attacks that I had durring middle school for things that did not relate to peer pressure, self esteem, or any of that other "after school special" nonsense that they preach about in school.
As far as goth culture, which I could say from experience having a high school crush on one girl who was a goth and teasing another girl who was a goth, I can state that goths had nothing to do with Columbine.  Heck, the small group of goths I knew spent lunch hour everyday playing hacky-sack until they lost their hacky-sack to the ledge on the second floor of the school, in which they had to wait until someone got a new hacky-sack the next day.  They weren't in a corner reading poetry or plotting to something violent involving Satan as mainstream media had pidgeon holed them.  So goths are an OK group of people.  I could understand their feelings about having to go to school assemblies where the school parades the cheerleaders and jocks around like we should really care about "the big game this weekend".  They never seem to have assemblies for the math club or debate team.
However, aside from being the school's pracing ponies, the athletes and the cheerleaders at the school, or as the media calls them "the jocks", were also another group of friendly people.  They didn't pick on people.  They didn't single out non-jocks, and they often did alot of things involving academics, because the coaches were pretty strick about athletes keeping their grades up.  Hence the feeling of "school first, sports last".
So what did happen the rest of the day, after I was told I could be a possible threat to the rest of the school?  Basically, it was an average day.  I shrugged it off.  I told my parents, a couple of friends I knew I could trust, and one of the vice principals about it.  All of it privately.  The vice principal I talked to about it thought it was rather stupid and made certain that he would talk to the girl who started this potentially damaging rummor.
What soon followed was nothing short of a conspiracy.  I was singled out by the school district.  There was a meeting with the school principal, two of the vice principals, my advisor, the teacher who brought told me about the rumor, my parents, the guidance councelor, a teacher from the special education department, and someone from school district headquarters.  The meeting concluded where I went to school as ususal, except there was a woman there who looked like she was trying to impersonate a high school student who acted as a shadow and followed me around all day.  When the day was over, I heard her talk to one of the vice principals saying that my life was "boring".  To which I joined in the conversation stating "No, really, you think?!"  Yeah, my life is rather subtile but it didn't stop the school from attempting to embarrass my parents.
Normally, when you get suspened, someone from school calls your parents.  However, the people who were so eager to see that I go away sent A FAX MESSAGE to my father, stating I was to be susspended for ten days, then seven days, then until futher notice.  Reguardless, my parents an I were furious!  Another meeting with someone from the school district proved fruitless.  Shortly there after, we hired a lawyer with money that would have put me though college.  I still went to college, just not the one I was hoping to go to thanks to the witchhunt at school.  
Durring my time of susspension, the school principal sent police to search my home for guns.  I don't like guns.  I would never use a gun to hurt anyone, ever.  The officers were from the city that my school was in.  These officers never came to my home when I was assaulted on school grounds because the city boundary defined one side of the highway to be part of the adjacent community.  I had to call the cops in my community to report what happened.  However, when ever there is a student who is dangerously intellegent, they can waltz in and search my home WITHOUT A WARRENT! My home was outside city limits.  They found nothing.  My mom also wanted me to hide my computer.  The school had searched my computer usage at school and found nothing but alot about history, most of it on math and science.  I barely had access to the school computers because the IT department constantly locked the door and one time when I had injured myself, I was denied access to assistive technology and the stuff they gave me was very slipshod.  I was even bumped off the computer by the schools program for typing a paper for one of my classes.  Thus, my access to technology was very terse unlike the kids I ratted out at the school library who were printing images of Victoria Secret models.
When it was all over, things were never the same.  It would later turn out that the school principal and one of the vice principals (not the one that I had spoken too before this conspiracy against me occured) had started the rumor.  The primary goal was to just get rid of me.  No reason what so ever.  Just to kick me out of school.  Ironically, the stereotypical people you would think would be kicked out of school after an incident like this were not kicked out, in fact some of them didn't even want to be my friends anymore.  The goth chick who I did like didn't want to be friends with me anymore because she though I might shoot up the school.  Other girls were afraid to go out with me.  My sister went on a date with someone who asked if I was going to kill people.  My brother was in an altercation against another student at his school defending my honor.  He was susspened for three days for fighting.  I was also called "The Unibomber" because one of the rummors was that I would blow up the school.  I would certainly not, considering that I kept some of my academic work at school and would have felt terrible about loosing it.  The ostriziation did not stop there.  Even before high school, they school district wanted me to see a theripist.  I didn't need therapy! I needed someone who could see that I wasn't a threat to anyone or myself!  Angry with how the school treated me, my parents enrolled my siblings into private school.  I refused to join them because I still wanted to prove the school wrong.
I gradated high school.  Durring the graduation speech I nearly fell out of my chair laughing when the superintendent stated "[school district's name] is the best school district in the world."
My story has everything to do with this article.  It is because of Columbine, the school decided to used this unfortunate tragedy to their advantage.  They had no respect for me.  They had no respect for what happened to those people.  They only wanted me gone.
In retrospect, I question still have questions about why it happened.  Just because I had the same interest as those two boys, I am nothing like what they were and would never want to be who they were.  But to blame everyone and everything for this incident is alot like trying to kill a fly with a shotgun instead of a flyswatter.
Was it paranoia?  Was it hate?  Was there greed involved?
I lost everything I loved in high school because of fear except for my academic status. No one I know came went to college with me. I assumed they all went to comunity college or got blue collar jobs. In alot of ways the ostricization kept me as a 16 year old teenager. I'm 22 now.  Sometimes I wonder if I matured. Sometimes I wonder if I should mature.  I question what is to become of myself. I have changed, but the world has stayed the same.
I want to share something with the Wikipedia community that was created this summer on Newgrounds.com by a person named AloneInTheDark.  It is a movie about a school shooting, similar to the Columbine shooting.  When you see it, you will probably have mixed feelings about why what happened happened.
Autumn Tree
--Bushido Hacks 02:17, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kneejerk Mafia 

message: Hello guys: 
I just wanted to find out if the investigation ever proved there being a third shooter?  I am doing a report on this tragedy, and would like to know if there is anything that would be of use in my work.  
Bold text
:There was no third shooter. The janitor was hiding on the roof, and the police thought it might have been a third suspect since he wasn't evacuating like the rest of the student body. --Hurricane Angel 10:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devastation 

message: "It is considered to be the deadliest school shooting, and the second deadliest attack on a school in US History."
Out of curiosity, what was the first? Fantom 19:06, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second deadliest 

message: Is it still up somewhere? I'd like to know. Worldmaster0
This site has some of Eric's webpages archived, but many of the links give 404 errors. -- PRueda29 Ptalk29 18:27, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric's site 

message: Alright I'm not sure if this is true...but I heard that because of massacre that most schools in the suburbs can't go off campus for lunch, yo is true?
No, even in colorado schools in jefferson county were allowing thier kids to go off campus. As much as I can remember this is a non issue.  Wardenusa 05:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No off compus due to te masacre? 

message: I have semi-protected this article to allow only established users and admins (meaning no anons or new users) to edit it due to the fact this page is constantly vandalised, usually through blanking or changing of the victims/perps names to someone else's.  It has come to mine, and another user's attention that new users and anons make very few useful contributions and contribute to all of the vandalism.  If you have any objections with this decision, please discuss it here first.  If you are an admin who disagrees, you may unprotect the page at your discretion but please discuss your reasons here either before or after unprotecting.  New users/anons who want to add a constructive edit may suggest it here also.  New users will be allowed to automatically edit the article freely by achieving a certain number of good edits. PRueda29 / Ptalk29 / Pcontribs29 07:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protection 

message: Hi there. I've noticed that some of the paragraphs could use a little touching up, and wanted to know if it's OK for me to edit these parts? For instance, deadliest massacre is a bit of a strange combination of words; a massacre is "The act or an instance of killing a large number of humans indiscriminately and cruelly", so it's not really a good way of describing something.
Cheers anyway
Mr Spum 13:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Able to edit this page? 

message: I'm recording this article for Spoken Wikipedia and have run across several technical variations in the article. Basically, the article sounds kind of odd read aloud. If we could just "pick one" in each of the following and apply them throughout the article, it would make it even better. Ckamaeleon 00:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a neat, fun way to find such inconsistencies, which obviously have gone unnoticed otherwise. :) --Golbez 11:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Will add any others I find. But yeah, I realized that it's an unintended benefit of Spoken Wikipedia. 
Ckamaeleon 22:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency issues-- Perhaps worth discussion/assigning for cleanup? 

message: Hi there. I added the wearing of trench coats as one of the things covered by the moral panic, but it was deleted without explanation. There was a strong perceived link between the killers' imaginary subculture and trench coats in the mind of the public after the massacre, so there was alot of suspicion toward teenagers who wore them. Many school districts even banned them.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.109.169.67 (talk • contribs) .
This is generally perceived as being included in the goth culture moral panic outlash.  Plus, I think there are already too many things on that list, we don't have to specify every detail of what was outlashed against.  Though, I can't be sure if I want to exclude trenchcoats being such a big part of this.  I don't know, I guess you can add it back then.  Sorry. -- PRueda29 / Ptalk29 / Pcontribs29 16:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trench coats 

message: The "Cultural Impact" section was surprisingly and pleasingly lean, focusing on fairly major ripples; I just noticed a comparitively non-noteable (and pretty darn exploitative, based on some initial poking around) book, so I pulled it. Wrong of me? Hope not. --MattShepherd 21:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing major, pulled a book ref 

message: Please add the hebrew article to the languages box. The link:
he:הטבח בתיכון קולומביין
--88.152.142.237 18:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hebrew article

message: WHO THE Hxxx??
:OMG NO ONE DID !!!! it was temporarily blanked, and was fixed within seconds. --Golbez 22:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHO DELETED THIS ARTICLE?? 

message: This article is really good, but could use citations in the April 20, 1999 section.  The references state that there are thousands of pages of information describing what happened, and if I was to write a report on this, I wouldn't want to have to comb through that just to verify the information in this article. —Spangineer[es] (háblame) 15:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of what's written in that section comes from the official CNN investigation page, backed up by the 11,000 page report.  CNN sumarizes all the events into about 45 pages (citation 14, I believe), which includes diagrams and such.  I actually read about 6,000 pages of the 11,000 page report (most of it was bureacratic nonsense, so it was about 3,000 really... and no, I'm not insane) in three weeks or so and was able to pretty much confirm most of what was stated in the CNN report (to make sure there wasn't a huge bias).  Using the diagrams on CNN I was able to piece together what happened on that day with most of the specifics of events taken from the 11,000 page report.  Still, if we were to cite everything in that section, what exactly should we cite?  Events?  Injures?  Major Occurances?  Deaths? I believe most of the quotes in the article are already cited with the exception of the time they entered the library which is backed up by the 911 recording.  The times stated all come from the CNN report with the exception of the time they leave the library which varies depending on where you read (11:37 to 11:47, I put it in the middle, at 11:42, to be fair).  If it's just general occurances, a link citation to each individual CNN page could work better than having to link to a .pdf webpage that has about 50-100 pages in it where a person would have to read almost every single one of those pages to actually find the citation refered to (the 11,000 page report is just 11,000 scanned pages, placed in .pdf format, 100 per individual link, so we couldn't actually cite any of that directly.  We could only add a link to the one webpage containing 100 pages in which the event is cited).  Also, I have a feeling that adding 45 extra links to that section might clutter up the page, but if you have an idea on how to make that simpler, I'd be up for it. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 17:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't need actual links to the data so much as simply telling readers where to find it. Thus, I'd recommend that for every paragraph have one citation at the end which mentions the page numbers (or just gives the raw links, like this: ) of the CNN report that were used for that specific paragraph. It doesn't sound like citing the page numbers of the .pdf files would be realistic, unless in some places only one or two 100 page files was used for a paragraph (it's ok to say "see pages 3-56 of document number 23 and pages 23-34 document number 34"; that's much better than "see the 11,000 page report"). The library time discrepancy could probably use a separate note describing the issue (who says what), and it might be easier to switch this article over to the new <references> system (described at Wikipedia:Footnotes).  That way you can add references to the text itself without having to hop back and forth between the prose and the references section, and without having to worry about keeping the numbers straight. I can help out with the conversion process if you'd like.  —Spangineer[es] (háblame) 20:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I added the references to the citations you asked for earlier.  The one for "500 students" is covered under reference #9.  As for the reference concerning Bernall, I'm not too sure if the one I found is exactly what you were asking for so please check it.  The other two (for brooks brown and the dave sanders library bit) have been covered pretty well in my opinion.  If the new reference styling is better, then yes go ahead and switch to it, especially if it can cover double citations (such as the case with reference #9) without having to list them twice at the bottom.  Concerning the timing, what happens is that most offical sources place a timeframe rather than an exact time of when they left the library (such as "between 11:39 and 11:42"), and some news sources who mention that go anywhere between 11:37 and 11:47.  To me, 11:37 sounds too short of a time (7 minutes) to have done all that in, but it's possible.  A good way to solve that would be to find out the time when students began to leave the library, which happened immediately after the shooters left (maybe video from the helicopters or something).  As for the 11,000 page report,  it would take some time to find exactly what is needed from each of those pages, and that I'm a little lazy about reading through 11,000 pages (I admit it).  Most of the report is full of such bureacratic language that for example it takes three sentences to describe that someone sneezed.  The report also has several different accounts of how things occured, most of the beginning is eyewitness accounts, then there are two separate reconstructions of events (by two different police departments investigating), autopsy reports, police reports, minute by minute accounts of police reactions and evacuations, a lot of information about the killers, and none of it is in a specific order, nor is there a glossary or table of contents that directs you towards it the correct information.  We'd have to literally skim through all 11,000 pages to find the correct source in the reports.  Also, the documents aren't listed as "document #34" rather they're listed as: Pages 1-199, Pages 200-299, 300-399, and so on until it reaches 11,000, so the reference would be more like "see pages 36-54", or "see pages 10,456-10,499", not really appealing to have to turn to page 10,456! LOL.  Well, I'll see what can be done.  If you want, contact me on my talkpage and we can figure it out. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 20:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I added this template to advertise WikiProject Disaster Management.  My hope is that, by adding the template to this article, we can coordinate our efforts at the Disaster Management project, using this article as an example of what we should strive for in other articles of the same subject matter.  Is anyone opposed to me adding this template here (perhaps based on the grounds that these templates should only be added to articles that need to be expanded or significantly improved)? -- backburner001 17:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About the <nowiki>{{Disaster management}}</nowiki> template

message: What did the shooters do that morning before they arrived at the school at 11:00 a.m.?  I heard they attended a bowling class.  Is that true?  Also, how did the bombs get on the roof of the school and into other locations on the school campus?  The article doesn't say.  Furthermore, who did the BMW belong to that had the car bomb in it?  The article isn't clear.  I think it's a good article except for those inconsistencies. Cla68 17:16, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Before the shooting started

message: I've decided that due to the large amount of vandalism surrounding this article ever since April 19 (most likely because of its 7th anniversary), I am semi-protecting this article for a few days until the hype dies down.  All the vandalism in the last 8 days has been done by anons and new users and semi-protecting the article will help discourage this constant vandalism (has been 5 - 10 times per day since April 19, while it was only a few times  per week before then).  I ask any persons who diagree to please discuss the matter here before unprotecting, protection will only be for a few days. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 02:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protection on April 27/28 

message: Hi, i wanted to add something to the page. there is an underground rap artist named ILL BILL. ILL BILL is part of PSYCHO + LOGICAL records (NECRO, ILL BILL, GORETEX, MR.HYDE, SABAC RED). On ILL BILL's debut album, What's Wrong With Bill? he has a song titled, The Anatomy Of A School Shooting (track 3). The song is the story of the Columbine shooting from Eric Harris's point of view. its a great song and it isn't just a gruesome story of how he killed people, it is a story of what lead up to the shooting, how it was instigated, and what people could have done or not done that could have changed the outcome of such a horrible moment in our contry's short history.
I bought my cd from a best buy but it is availble for purchase on www.psychologicalrecords.com THANKS Mattdevil
What about the song "Stole" by Kelly Rowland? that would be the perfect song. Sad, though. Funfair15
Done, but this still needs better verification, so it may be removed again... just thought I'd warn you. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 18:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music inspired by Columbine Shooting 

message: Does anyone know what grades were the shooters in? Judging by their ages, I'd say that they were either juniors or seniors. However, the article makes no mention. --Ixfd64 00:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  what grades were the shooters in? 

message: Link to the Cannabis Culture 420 or coincidence? --Kvasir 06:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 420

message: I recently made some big changes in the Firearms section, but some people seem to change my information, like Klebolds shotgun - it was a 12 gauge, not 24 gauge. Im not even sure if there is such thing as a 24 gauge shotgun, but someone did change it. Here's official proof of the accuracy of what I put in the Firearms section. 
Thanks for reading, REN 02:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Firearms

message: someone has put a fake movie in the article, it is from the movie columbine zero day. They describe this video as if it were the real shooting.  This video is very disturbing considering the lie  of it being true.  That video is not real. I am not familar with wiki editing but  deleted it.  Sorry if i did not follow proper wiki rules or something, but a distrubing fake video, did not belong there.  Sorry for spelling, not feeling very good right now.
it was probably a misunderstanding...71.98.16.172 08:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: There was a Fake Movie in Link

message: Speculated to be about?  When its already released and clearly talks about Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold?
"Underground rap artist Ill Bill released an album which includes the song "Anatomy of a school shooting", is speculated to be about the Columbine massacre."
he refers to them by name in the song
heres the lyrics
[Verse 1]
The anatomy of a school shooting, shotgun under my trenchcoat
Columbiners did it, dead spoke - bloodred soaked
My mind consume the doom as I walk through the school
15 people killed and over 14 wounded
My name is Eric Harris, I was forever harrased, an outcast
You fuck with us and now me and Dylan is pulling out gats
I've been wantin to murder people
Suicide is played out, if you gonna die, take people with you
We've been planning this before the kids from Jonesboro did it
And I wanted the world to know when people died why we did it
I even killed myself but don't feel sorry for me
Feel sorry for your seads as we spread the diesease
Another bloodbath coming soon to a school near you
Smalltown killing-spree that's organized by the youth
Fuck the media, them fags be disguising the truth
Dragging my name through the mud when televizing the news
A bunch of ticking timebombs y'all, is more like me
Overflowin with hate, bullied to get raw like me
They constantly get picked on and shitted on like me
You'd probably get your head blown off by a kid like me
I put my mind to it and what I accomplish's frightening
The right thing, no matter what you idiots might think
Check it, I did that shit so idiots might think
This ain't a game, the nerds that you be fuckin with might flip
[Chorus: repeat 2X]
It's like this, what's more fun than slice wrist?
Kill that teacher that you hate, spray 25 kids
You'd be famous just like me if you did what I did
This is the anatomy of a school shooting
[Verse 2]
I see dead people, it isn't my fault that they were evil
Fuck a favorite I hate everybody equal
Bitch I warned y'all, didn't I?
Now everybody wanna talk shit and cry asking why
- Two geeks picked up guns and turned murderous
All of y'all under beneath me you don't deserve to live
Two nerdy kids is that a crime?
why I've gotta be one of the cool kids just to walk by
- without being tripped, thrown down on the ground and kicked
Insulting me for no reason, I was treated like shit
The teachers let it happen
I've even seen some of them teachers laughing
That's why I had a smile on my face when I started blastin
I wasn't crazy - all of y'all were sick
I was the nicest person in the world - y'all were dicks
Don't even try to analyze me now you have no chance, back then
- maybe you could've been my friend
[Chorus]
thank you for listening^_^71.98.16.172 08:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ill Bill

message: Is it possible that Harris and Klebold decided the date to be on April 20 because KMFDM's album "Adios" was to be released that day?
Eric Harris said at the bottom of one of his journal pages (98) that:
"Get this. KMFDM's new album is entitled "Adios" and it's release date is in April. How fuckin appropriate, a subliminal final "Adios" to Reb and Vodka, thanks KMFDM...I ripped the hell outta the system."
Anybody know anything about this?Mimbster 03:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: KMFDM

message: "The massacre inspired Finnish symphonic metal group Nightwish to write "The Kinslayer", for their Wishmaster album (1999)."
- Sounds like speculation to me. Anyone got a source? I assumed it was about the Wheel of Time books myself, though the song mentions a gun I'd hardly say it linked to the massacre directly... 
Edit-Just done some more research on this myself, and it's looking more likely now, being a Nightwish fan and someone with a strong interest in Columbine I'm surprised I never caught on, but the 'good wombs hath borne bad sons' quote seems to indicate it's true! Interesting... Xzamuel 02:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, unless an outside quote can be found saying so, it's original research. --Golbez 03:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Kinslayer? 

message: The article contains the statement "The shotgun was the primary weapon used by Harris and was fired a total of 25 times" which is very misleading.  Harris fired his rifle 96 times, which would make it the primary weapon as far as shots fired.  I assume by "primary weapon" the article is referring to the number of injuries or deaths resulting from the weapon (I have no source for that, I'm purely speculating).  If so, the article should be reworded accordingly.  If not, then it should state that the rifle was his primary weapon.  The citation I provided does state that the shotgun was Harris's weapon of choice inside the library, however the article does not make that clear.  --Dan East 03:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firearm use misleading 

message: Schnurr's name appears wrongly at one point as "Schurr". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.62.19 (talk • contribs) 
:Fixed.  Thank You -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 22:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Added an NPOV tag, as there's alot of stories in the context which could be argued, and if you look at the edit history, alot of information has been changed to say completley different things, who knows which is right?  Matt 17:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What specifically are you talking about, the entire article is backed up by several sources, and the stuff that has been changed tends to be because it was unsourced before and now it's sourced correctly to the actual event.  Either way, tell us what in specifics you're speaking about because if you do not then there's no way we can fix the NPOV conflict you see. Also, please sign your statements on talk pages by using ~~~~. Thank You -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 15:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever, keep it off then, I don't give a rat's ass, it's not my article. Matt 17:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, man, i'm not insulting you or anything, if you really think there's an NPOV problem with the article then it's something to be addressed, it's just you didn't say what was wrong with the article, your description was very vague, if you can point what you feel is wrong with it specfically, then the few editors who normally watch this article can go around fixing it.  It's just it seems like you are comparing the current version to the older now obsolete versions.  The thing about these old versions is that they were mostly written by authors who had heard the events here and there, just like anyone else but had no sources to back them.  Later, several editors came by and added references to the events, basically saying... "this is not what happened, this is what happened and I can prove it here", giving us a credible link to back that up, then the article was changed to address correct events based on the link given.  Also, most of the article is written based off of the official jefferson county sheriff office's publically released investigation paperwork, and it doesn't get much more credible than that.  Basically, most of what was written before that was later changed was wrong in some way, and someone came by and changed it using a credible link to back it up.  You can check these links throughout the article; they are little numbers inside of brackets that look sort of like this [1], if you click theose links, they will send you to the actual outside source backing up the statements in this article which proves that as of right now, a credible source has agreed these were the events that occured.  Still, there may be areas in the article which are considered non-NPOV by some users, and if any user feels this way they can certainly put up an NPOV tag and then tell us on the talk page what they feely is not NPOV about the article, but if we're not told what it is, then we can't just leave the tag on there because there hasn't been any indiciation to exactly what is NPOV about it, and so the tag becomes pointless.  So, if you do see something wrong with the article, then specify to us what it is so we can all work together and change it, your concerns were very vague, but that doesn't mean they don't exist, but if you no longer feel like address it, I can't force you, sitll, I encourage you to because now I want to know what it is to fix it, lol.  Sorry if I sounded rude or demeaning, I don't mean to. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 17:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fine, I'm sorry for being rude. Anyway, I have no sources or anything, I'm just saying if you look through the history, alot of the stories are changed quite dramatically, and it's not possible for both things to be true. I can't give an example, but frequent reading has shown this article changes alot, and I didn't know which side was true, so I NPOV tagged a few days later and thought I'd leave it to someone with sources/experiences to clean up. Matt 18:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Anyone know why the bombs failed to explode? 70.104.16.146 09:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because they were homemade by two teenagers who weren't experts in making explosives. Rzrscm 03:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: failed pipe bombs

message: There where 2 people that where shot because they said they believed in God. One was Rachel Scott, the other was in the library, her name was Cassie Bernall. I dont know why is said in the text that 3 people confirmed this exchange did not occur. It is proven it was happened. Cassie's best friend heard it. There has even been a documentary about this, so i dont know why it stands like this in the article. I would like to know any sources for that the conversation between shooter and the Christian wasn't true, else, ill change it did happened. SidewinderXP2 Talk to me!
The source is the official investigation done by the Jefferson County Sherrif's department and FBI; it's linked throughout the article.  The only persons who were in position to witness either exchange said they never happened, the only one confirmed that occured is the one with Val Schnurr, which might've been confused for Cassie Bernall in the aftermath, and the one with Rachel Scott was debunked almost right away after the shooting; there are several other sources throughout the article supporting this.  Thus, don't change anything because we're following the most official accounts there could possibly be here, regardless of what is circling around in documentaries (whether for or against the notions), even if you feel they are true we can't use them because it contradicts official statements and those are the ones we go by.  Also, you can't really rely on what independent documentaries say when it comes to this, in that case, we should also go by what Michael Moore says, which was full of errors to begin with.  So, we only use mostly official media and investigation reports for proof.  You can read them yourself, the main one is the 11,000 page report link towards the bottom and there's also the CNN investigation page which are major throughout the article.  While mentioning the possibility these exchanges occured and the fact people still insist they did is fine and encouraged, you can't word these additions as if they were confirmed when there is no official proof of them and when the official investigation contradicts it. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 14:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rachel Scott, about christians 

message: I changed the repeated references to the murderers as "shooters" to say "murderers," because that is an accurate description of what they did that day that made them and this event notorious, and represented a non-NPOV.  I was disappointed to see someone switched it back, claiming NPOV.  I disagree.
Calling murderers "shooters" is a coded message to blame the weapons for the acts of their users.  It has entered common parlance, as has calling them "gunmen."  When someone goes on a knifing rampage, he is not called a "knife-wielder" or "stabber" or "slasher."
This is because firearms are controversial, whereas knives are not.  Many people believe there is no morally-just reason for anyone to own a firearm, while many believe that firearms, used properly, can be a force for good.
Some time ago, news reporters starting the practice of calling murderers who use firearms merely "shooters."  The purpose was to tease the perceptions of those who hold firearms themselves at least partially responsible for the acts of their users, by highlighting the firearm's role in the event, and minimizing what would be perceived as an opposing moral judgment on the murderer by calling him so.  Pressing a hot-button issue sells papers.  Murder itself gets old; murder conducted by an inanimate object that some readers want to outlaw is more exciting.  Honestly, I doubt most reporters or editors today have given this much thought; it's such common parlance that people now write this way just because.
But the idea of blaming an object for what a human being chooses to do with it is a ludicrous thought process to begin with, contrived for political purposes.  Carrying this on through these code words, even if it is so common we barely notice it any more, does not comport with the NPOV concept.
The police who responded were also "shooters."  Using the same word to describe the murderers and the police would imply they had the same intent, when they clearly did not.  So we call them "police" in the article, because they were there to police the situation, and that involved shooting.  We should similarly call the murderers what they are, since that was what they were there for, and it involved shooting, as well as attempts to set fires.
Jeff 80.255.39.45 19:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording has nothing to do with political views or statements, the word murderer provoks an emotional response from readers which is something we're not going for when we are describing detailed events of an incident we are not involved in.  The wording and vocabulary here is used to allow the reader to go through the events without ever having to feel emotionally attached to them, and the word shooter is a word that does not produce an emotional response.  It is also not attempting to blame the guns, or blame anything, it's just telling the reader who the subject of the sentence is, the shooter being whomever is shooting.  As you can see, we also use the word "perpetrators" throughout the article, because neither of these words produce an emotional response from a reader like using the word murderer or killer would, depsite these words also being accurate descriptions.  The word police does not produce an emotional response, so it can be used in this contenxt.  This method is often found in detailed description of events which are meant to showcase the incident to the public in a neutral tone.  Our goal is to simply describe the events related to the shooting, not tell a the readers a story.  Thank you for your concerns, though, and feel free to voice anymore you see. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 01:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More NPOV