lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:3 Hits from Hell

message: This may not be the best place to discuss it, but should the song "Who Killed Marilyn?" be included in the Misfits discography links? It's a Danzig solo release, to the best of my knowledge... Someone who knows how should fix that.... Krys Nyteshade 19:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only is it a Danzig solo release, but it's also a single... I corrected the chronology as part of my last edit. Slicing 02:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Who Killed Marilyn?
Talk:Final Descent (album)

message: Final Descent is also a TV-movie released in 1997 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0127557/) 84.175.113.33 (talk) 19:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also a Film
Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29

message: Although the "MiG" designation has been retained over the years, the proper designer name for the MiG-29 (and later MiG aircraft) is "Mikoyan", not "Mikoyan-Gurevich". Please DO NOT move the article text from Mikoyan MiG-29 to this redirect site. Askari Mark | Talk 18:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mikoyan" vs. "Mikoyan-Gurevich"
Talk:Indestructible (Rancid album)

message: In the Red Hot Moon video, is the blonde girl at the table Kelly Osbourne? Just wondering... The appearances in the video may be notable. Kickasskat 00:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the Trivia/Notes section because it appeared to be a direct copy of the album's liner notes. This is not allowed under Wikipedia's copyright policy. Sorry. Mike Dillon 02:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia/Notes section removed 

message: Any sources?--Revilal90 (talk) 17:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dance Punk? 
Talk:Rancid (2000 album)

message: Is there any proof the album was recorded in one take? I have never read that anywhere except here
I remember Lars Frederiksen saying that most of the songs on the album were recorded in one take in an interview about the album. --Blaguymonkey (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recorded in one session 

message: Could someone please put who all the songs are written by?KChuck27 22:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Wrote The Song 
Talk:Alexandre de Marenches

message: I just can't find his dates of birth and death!!! David.Monniaux 21:29, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Kurt Hirsch

message: There is a bio at http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Hirsch.html if anyone wants to take a shot at adapting it. Stormie 21:44, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
:To my ear this article is plagiarized from the MacTutor article cited above. The article does not even cite that source. And even if it did, would such a clear rephrasing of a copyrighted article be acceptable by Wikipedia standards? Compare Wikipedia:Plagiarism Typometer (talk) 16:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wikified the article a bit before noticing the plagiarism problem.  Fixing the plagiarism is probably easy: just cut out more of the flavor text, and stick to the simple facts (which I tried to wikify).  It is probably also reasonable to split out his mathematical work from his bio; the non-math bio could be 2 or 3 paragraphs (schooling, journalistic work, family life).  The MR link has a list of many of his papers.  Doing a search for Hirsch in the title is also reasonable, as the Hirsch length and Hirsch-Plotkin radical are pretty well studied. JackSchmidt (talk) 07:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MacTutor
Talk:Argentina

message: No Gardel in the music block? Fretta2437 (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardel? 

message: Media: welsh language newspaper ‘Y Drafod’ published since 1891, Trelew. 2A02:C7C:2FAB:1700:A8A6:5507:3C5D:1127 (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your point? Roger 8 Roger (talk) 01:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh in Chubut
Talk:S.O.B. (film)

message: Query: does the phrase or the abbreviation occur in the film? I seem to recall that it doesn't, but I have not seen it in 12 years so I can't speak with any authority on that issue. 209.149.235.254 22:48, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Or
Talk:Bona Drag

message: The paragraph currently reads, "After releasing Viva Hate in March 1988, Morrissey modified his method of releasing music. Instead of choosing to produce an immediate follow-up album, he decided to release a string of independent singles in the hopes of achieving success in that market."   In actuality, the process of releasing independent singles between albums dated back to The Smiths. That's why Louder Than Bombs and The World Won't Listen were viable compilations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alainsane (talk • contribs) 02:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the album 

message: In The National's song "Pink Rabbits" it has the verse,  "Everybody was gone / I was staring down the street / 'cause I was trying not to crack up / Bona Drag was still on / now I only think about Los Angeles when the sound kicks out". 50.52.104.122 (talk) 02:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference in popular culture
Talk:Vauxhall and I

message: There was only the mention of the Q ranking previously. Seemed like not a lot of info, and seeing as this album is usually ranked among his best, I thought I'd add a bit more detail in this section. 2A02:C7C:5EC4:6B00:9D86:9276:BFC2:E5D8 (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception
Talk:Talking Heads: 77

message: Can someone check these. I've made an attempt to correct the Personnel section, which seemed to have been directly copied from another Talking Heads album.
habiloid (talk) 07:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording Personnel

message: Is this guy for real?  With comparisons to Yes, and statements like "the irony is that he's not being ironic" or "every self-help homily [is] contextualized dramatically", it's too bizarro to be taken seriously, and too lacking in humor to be taken as a joke.  --Register allocation 01:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Christgau's review 

message: I haven't figured out how to include the format of the album title into the article without having it be all original research, and I can't find a source for it.  But in 1977 the title format was obviously based on the naming format for computer programs at the time; like for example: FORTRAN 77.  The album title is similarly printed in all capital letters, followed by the two digit year of release (pre-y2k, naming conventions).  This was then, and may yet be, either so obvious to those familiar with computers at the time, or so esoteric to everyone else, as to go without explanation.  In the same way that referring to anything as 1.0 or 2.0, etc. would presently go without explanation; with the notable difference that a much smaller percentage of the public was then familiar with any aspect of computer code. However, as time passes, the cultural reference may be lost. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On further consideration of the significance of the title format, I would like to recommend changing the article title from "Talking Heads: 77" to "TALKING HEADS: 77" - Michael J Swassing (talk) 01:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would feel more comfortable if we had a reliable source that supported the use of capital letters. Neither the band's quasi-official website nor David Byrne's website use capitals. — Malik Shabazz  02:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree that a reliable source is needed to make the connection in any way, and I do not recall ever reading anything of the nature.  Nothing urgent in the suggestion, just something to look into when somebody finds the time. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 02:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Album title format: computer code release

message: I inserted new reviews, from sites of this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Review_sites
It's open to changes, if someone wants to choose the reviewers.
CrimsonGust (talk) 03:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New reviews

message: After all these years (34 in fact), still no information on other musicians - e.g. sax and marimba on First Week, Last Week? Startling. Dr.O.Farr-Kinnel (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other musicians?
Talk:Eastern Germany (disambiguation)

message: I added this point because there has to be a term referencing the eastern part of what is now Germany. Though, I'm not sure whether this is the common usage in the English language. Toscho 19:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Territory of GDR 

message: The usage of the terms East Germany and Eastern Germany respectively their German translations differs strongly in both languages. Because also Germans want to read the English Wikipedia and might be confused from this use, I added the German explanations.Toscho 19:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German explanations 

message: the use of the term seems controversial at best. It would be like calling California "Northern Mexico"...--Nero the second (talk) 15:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former eastern territories of Germany = Eastern Germany?
Talk:Green's theorem

message: Not that it really matters, but I usually see (American mathematics texts) Green's thm stated with functions named P and Q, rather than L and M.  In fact, the last section of this article employs these letters.  Does anyone object to me going through and switching to P and Q? Chip McShoulder (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a textbook, thus it's not our job to teach it. Wolfram Mathworld also isn't the best resource for learning either - it's more a reference or "handbook" like Wikipedia is.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation Question 

message: I changed the integral code to use the {{intorient | symbol = ointctr template.  But I don't know if there's a specific template for the double-integral, so I can't embed the double integral notation for the right side of the equation (as is shown on the template documentation example).  So it's shown on two lines - is there a way to get this on a single line? Jimw338 (talk) 07:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation for counter-clockwise integral symbol 

message: I don't know what these are and I don't know why there's no links about them. I would expect a hyperlink to another wikipage 132.204.27.207 (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type I vs Type II
Talk:The Party's Over (Talk Talk album)

message: There should be a disambiguation page for the song(s), album, and book. --Rajah 07:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation

message: The first sentence says that the album was "known simply as Talk Talk in the U.S." But that's not a shortening: it's a different title altogether. Can anyone provide confirmation of this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by  Zenohockey (talk • contribs)  04:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US title 

message: I bought the American 33-1/3 RPM vinyl on eBay and found out that its tracklist is slightly different: All the tracks stay in same positions, but "Today" (A3) and "Hate" (B1) had switched each other in American vinyl.  (See http://www.discogs.com/Talk-Talk-The-Partys-Over/release/325766)  Also, the American tape cassette is different as well; the only tracks that stayed their own positions were "Talk Talk" (A1), "Have You Heard the News?" (B2), and "Mirror Man" (B3).  (See http://www.discogs.com/Talk-Talk-The-Partys-Over/release/1003369) --Gh87 (talk) 04:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different tracklist in U.S. vinyl and cassette 
Talk:Quantum mind

message: I categorized quantum mind as a fringe theory, this is because there is still insufficient evidence to change the consensus of the scientific community.
The experiment done by Gregory D. Scholes and Aarat Kalra of Princeton University is amazing, but the scientific community has not changed the consensus yet. You may read the following article for that:
https://www.miragenews.com/consciousness-and-quantum-physics-quantum-mind-1036383/
below is the excerpt from the article:
 36.224.213.25 (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: I plan to move the neurological/philosophical content from quantum cognition into this article. Please see:
Talk:Quantum_cognition#Proposal_to_focus_on_"quantum_cognition"_based_on_Pothos_and_Busemeyer_review Johnjbarton (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move some content from [[quantum cognition]] into this article.
Talk:Council of Nicea

message: This is page is a result of a mispelling of Nicaea,  We have an article on this Ecumenical council at First Council of Nicaea, so this page should become a redirect to Council of Nicaea, which is a disambig page. 
However, the text in question that Angela has objected to is copyright 1911, and should be in the public domain.  Based on other articles I've read at this site, they didn't update the text when they posted it on the web, so calling this version a derivitive work seems suspect to me. Gentgeen 01:46, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Francis Stewart, 1st Earl of Bothwell

message: The two articles definitely should be merged. And, for ease of reference, I would suggest that 
"Francis Stewart, 5th Earl Bothwell" is the most accurate description. Technically, the 1577 belting of him as earl may have been a new creation, but his subsequent adoption of the Hepburn family crest within his own coat of arms and his own view of his continuity from his uncle (not to mention the sheer simplicity of refering to the last of the Earls Bothwell as 5th rather than 1st) would make this way of referencing seem preferable [sandmonster]
My information indicates that he was actually Francis Stewart, 1st Earl of Bothwell (second creation).
*Hereditary Titles.com
*thePeerage.com
The earldom seems to have been forfeited in 1567, and recreated for Francis.
Mackensen 01:58, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spirit of Eden

message: Though this album and its follow-up Laughing Stock defies categorization and is all about sound and texture, experimentation and genre-bending, it simply can't be labeled as post-rock, since the genre didn't exist back then, even though they were highly influential to the genre. It's just like naming an artist from the 70s 'alternative rock'. This album and laughing stock is, if anything, art rock, through and through.Revan ltrl (talk) 00:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should actually be considered Ambient music.  There's nothing art rock at all about this or Laughing Stock. It's too minimalist.--Degree9 (talk) 15:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ambient? Have you ever tried putting this on as background music? I've been woken up by the loud bits on more than one occasion! --Andybak (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-rock 
Talk:Kent, Washington

message: Is it really important to mention Kent station and all the restuarants located there. It sounds like a promotion and doesn't seem like something that should be included in an Encyclopedia. FastFoodKnight 23:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent Station 

message: Deleted text from this talk page as it appeared someone was using it as their personal scratch pad. That's what the sandbox is for. KuyaBriBriTalk 14:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted text

message: A note on the comment about Kentwood residents.
Vast majority of Kentwood's existence a "Covington" never existed, that's why the school was placed there in the first place. The area was considered an unincorporated part of Kent. Furthermore majority of the students that attend Kentwood live within the Kent city limits as of the early 90's when far-east hill was annexed. Majority of Covington residents attend Kentlake high along with some Black Diamond and southeast Kent residents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SouthernResidentOrca (talk • contribs) 04:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Kentwood High Note

message: The link below is a more recent source for the city's largest employers. See page 21. I do not know how to properly edit the main page, however. Someone else can do it if they would like.
https://www.kentwa.gov/home/showdocument?id=2758  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dima110 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , please make sure to properly format your citations (e.g. including the full publisher information and access-dates for web links). It's not a good look for B-Class articles to have bare URLs in citations. SounderBruce 01:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I use the Refill tool for managing my links. Let me know if that is not preferred. Happy to change :) Kaisertalk (talk) 01:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More recent information 

message: Why is “Justin aka nothinbutlag Day” considered vandalism? An official proclamation was drafted and signed by Mayor Dana Ralph in the city of Kent, WA deeming August 29th, 2020 to be the day in question. Lythwynn (talk) 08:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Holiday 

message: + 2019 Demographic Estimates for City of Kent, compared to State and Nation. ImogenCaroline (talk) 04:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 17 February 2021
Talk:Passchendaele

message: Can anyone provide any evidence that there was a Battle of Passchendaele on October 10-29, 1918 or that any of the 1918 battles in Flanders were known by any side as the Battle of Passchendaele?  British accounts say that Plumer's Second Army was in possession of Passchendaele Ridge by 29 September during a phase known as the "Battle of Ypres 1918" (28 September to 2 October).  The next offensive didn't start until 14 October (Courtai Offensive).  If there is no evidence of another battle with this name, I think this page should just redirect to Passchendaele seeing as that is where the community has decided the main article should be, and that is what most of the things linking to this page should be linking to. Geoff/Gsl 03:19, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle
Talk:Tatar (word)

message: This page was recently moved from Tatar which now re-directs to Tatars.  It seems that previously Tatars was named Tatar and was moved with the latter becoming a DAB page.  However in the course of fixing links that went directly to the DAB page I found that:
#Only around 8-9% of links to the DAB page were not intended directly for Tatars and of those most were cases of editor error (linking Crimean Tatars instead of Crimean Tatars, or a small number of links that should have been to the language.
#Of the 91% of links that should have been pointing to Tatars about half the original editor had displayed the correct article name Tatars and intentionally linked to Tatar think it was the correct article.
Given all of this I posed the question as to moving the DAB page here and redirecting Tatar to Tatars.  I put the question up at Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation_pages_with_links#Tatar_vs._Tatars and Talk:Tatars#Tatar_vs._Tatars and then waited several weeks.  At the time that I posed the question I went ahead and went through all of the links going to Tatar and fixed any that were not meant to go to Tatars (but left those).  Now that I have changed the redirects etc I will do another pass through links to Tatar just to be sure. Dalf | Talk 21:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This DAB page 

message: To bring this into line with normal practice, this page should be merged with the main Tatar article, except for those meanings which are totally unrelated, which should appear on a dab page at Tatar (disambiguation). Any objections?--Kotniski (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed restructuring
Talk:The Pratchett Portfolio

message: Um, I think the title is wrong here. There is a book called The Pratchett Portfolio with art by Paul Kidby, which this article seems to be about. The only "Discworld Portfolio" I could find was The Josh Kirby Discworld Portfolio, which is by, um, Josh Kirby. Not Paul Kidby. Stormie 03:14, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)
:This seems to have been sorted. violet/riga (t) 01:14, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Colonialism

message: The article is much beyond the 100k guideline for a split, and creating a separate list article, or several, would make the most sense. Some such lists already exist, such as List of French possessions and colonies. However, splitting may run into the problem that plagues the article as a whole, clear definition of the term, which determines what the list(s) should contain. There are ancient (pre-modern) empires, and those within the period of Western colonization, which should perhaps be different topics with their own articles. There are also entities such as the Protectorate of Peru which existed only a year.  WriterArtistDC (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nsae Comp (talk) 20:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be a single page that discusses the term "colonialism" and how it is used as a concept, then separate articles about actual instances of 'colonialism' by region/time. DenverCoder9 (talk) 02:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 

message: As noted, this article is much too long. Removed material that focuses on specific instances more appropriate for region/chronology based pages. DenverCoder9 (talk) 02:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentricism 

message: What is the purpose of Impact > End of empire? If anything, end of empires is an effect of decolonization? I propose to delete. Marxistpoodle (talk) 21:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of Empire 

message: Question 2A02:3037:205:98A0:DC0C:2EBF:ADDC:52D0 (talk) 09:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they are not yet a reality. The Banner talk 10:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are colonies on uninhabited or previously uninhabitable lands not mentioned? With possible Moon-, Mars-, or deep-sea-colonies popping up in media all the time the topic should be part of the article, shouldn't it?
Talk:Croft

message: 'croft' is used as a name for the houses of the farmers in a translation of the book 'independent people' by halldor laxness. but the farmers are in iceland, not scotland.
It has a hole in the roof which is to let any smoke out of it because they had no windows back in the olden days.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bethx270700 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:SUNY Brockport

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to SUNY Brockport. Per consensus, the suggested alternative title seems to be the COMMONNAME. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 13:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The College at Brockport, State University of New York →  – Official name change, which can be expected to be reflected in sources going forward. https://www.rochesterfirst.com/brockport/suny-brockport-officially-recognized-as-university/ Powers T 21:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Supported, this is the official name of the school and should be reflected in the title 137.21.138.67 (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 December 2022