lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Emperor's Club

message: The Plot section completely misses a solid third of the movie. It does not talk about what happens after Bell grows up and there is a rematch of the Emperor's Club competition. It also does not talk about Hundert's resignation  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.95.243 (talk) 00:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey all, 
I'm wondering whether we should make a disambig page for Emperor's Club.  It seems slightly awkward to have a hat link to an escort service at the top of an article that covers a popular movie.....
Would anyone second a motion to create a disambig page?  NickCT (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is only one link, so a disambiguation page would be excessive. There is no need to have the reader click twice to get to the VIP article. We have two options: keep it as it is, or remove it entirely. Emperors Club is a disambiguation page listing both articles, and Emperor's Club VIP redirects to the VIP article. I think it is fine to keep the hatnote; it is part of what makes Wikipedia interesting. :) Erik (talk | contribs) 23:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatlink to escort service? 

message: Kevin Kline's character is based on a real teacher, Bob Nowe, that the author had at Town School. The irony of a history teacher being named"Nowe", pronounced now has not been lost on anybody.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.162.152.22 (talk) 00:18, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The real teacher 

message: Just so everyone knows- the summary of the plot misses out on a very important part, where the teacher is invited to do a competetion between the three adults who previously participated in it as pupils. Bell is by then a senator. What happens in that conversation is a monumentally important part of the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.173.57.191 (talk) 00:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate Summary
Talk:Steve Bays

message: Like the troll above, I think Hot Hot Heat are pretty good, but are they really big enough for each of the band members to have his own page? This article is just copied and pasted from the main Hot Hot Heat article. The photo has no attribution (and a useless title) and the text is very sloppy - it wasn't even touched up after being copied from the other article. For instance, who is the "Hawley" mentioned in this article? You would have to read the original article to find out, because he's never introduced here.
I'm not going to bother fixing this because I think it should be combined with the main article, unless someone has a lot of new information to add here. Anyone have any thoughts on this before I enter it for deletion? Kafziel 16:30, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Article?
Talk:Paper mill (essays)

message: Yes.  The content is basically the same, and the terms are synonyms. Novalis 01:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =Should be merged with Essay Mill?

message: Hello, I own the copyright to this article, and it is posted on presss releases also.
The page is on Paper Mills - therefore it should contain links to the same.
Degree Essays UK is the largest UK one and there are many others, I suggest that they are all added.
^^^May I delete this stuff? Expo377 03:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not a link farm, nor is it a legitimate forum for you to promote your website. This article should not have any links to specific paper mills, at all, even as "examples". That would imply that we endorse certain sites. Rhobite 20:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately many teachers don't have the time or the motivation to scrutinize papers, so I'm sure custom-written papers do go unnoticed from time to time. Turnitin sounds like it works well for detecting bonehead plagiarism, such as cutting and pasting from web sites or submitting friends' papers. Rhobite 19:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  older stuff
Talk:Son of the Pink Panther

message: Is there a plot? does anyone know of or watched this movie?Cupy 52040 (talk) 07:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot?

message: I suggest that the article's remain separated.
-Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge 

message: Both articles are of very little importance and of very little size, and the goals of the 'Jacques Gambrelli' article - which are really just to say 'he's the son of Clouseau' - can easily be attained in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.107.24.213 (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Son of the Pink Panther is the eighth or the ninth in the series? Newone (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: The last sentence of the production paragraph seems to make no sense - can someone interpret an fix it?
"Before Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Animation established in the same year, the opening Pink Panther sequence is made by Desert Music Pictures."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.122.151.251 (talk) 20:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hale

message: ... are there in England? The one referred to in the New Forest (district) article does not seem to be mentioned here, so it's hard for me to go on disambiguating "Hale" in the articles which are linked to this page. <KF> 11:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many places called '''Hale''' ... 

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of the Hawaiian house type called Hale? --87.150.7.58 (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Honolulu Hale is an entry at See also, and the Hawaiian language definition is listed at the wiktionary link. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hawaiian Hale
Talk:Divers hands

message: Got to remove the first-person usage.
BTW, 'divers hands' was often used in 1970s comics when teams of inkers worked on the same pencilled story. 62.23.241.25 09:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That horrible first person section was in the article for over a year? Holy crap. EvilCouch 17:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Microsoft Certified Application Developer

message: I would have thought that someone would have written an entry for this.  Perhaps since this is empty I should write something to get this topic started.  Then allow others to improve it later.
Here's what I'm thinking about for an overview:
1. Abstract (brief description of the acronym and how it fits within Microsoft's certification library)
2. Requirements (if the MS page showing a nice table of the certification requirements has not been copywrited, I'll just copy and paste it.
3. Links (provide links to further documentation and sites that cover information about the cert)
As I am currently studying for this cert, I might later come back and write in other helpful information.
:Someone did create an entry for this, but it was a copy/paste from another web site and was deleted for copyright infringment. -- Cyrius|✎ 21:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm...Why is this empty?
Category talk:Gay politicians

message: This page should redirect to :Category:LGBT politicians Exploding Boy 20:44, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
: This was created to separate LGBT politicians into distinct categories for gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans politicians in much the same way as already existed within :Category:LGBT writers. I'm not going to agree or disagree as to whether it's better to do that or have them all filed in a single category, but that's why it was done. Bearcat 23:48, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: gay is not lgbt? this is queer, I thought LGBT is a collective term which stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender sexual and gender identities. but you always learn surfing wikipedia. Sebastian scha. (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone just added Roy Cohn to this category. To the best of my knowledge, he was "in the closet" his entire life. While he may have been gay, and he may have been a politician, he wasn't really a "gay politician" which implies the public knew he was gay. Perhaps there should be a subcategory for "closeted gay politicians".  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 07:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria
Talk:1998 WW31

message: Wikipedia doesn't really need two stubs, when there can be one unified article. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 23:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I just revised 1998 WW31, and, as a consequence, redirected the former stand-alone satellite article to its section "Satellite", see S/2000 (1998 WW31) 1 -- Rfassbind – talk 13:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[S/2000 (1998 WW31) 1]]
Talk:Middle-earth Collectible Card Game

message: I don't know enough about this game, but I found Middle-earth: The Wizards Collectible Card Game and it looks like an duplicate overview of the Middle-earth Collectible Card Game (perhaps only on the first base set?).  I suggest merging information that page to here as this is the much more common name.  -- Netoholic @ 20:56, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. Needs editing to fit the article though. - Snagari 13:30, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate articles 

message: I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, so I don't want to change this myself, but the last link seems a little bit suspect to me:  
 Tradecardsonline.com For a Complete Card List, Manage your card inventory (have/want,etc) Online, 
 Play Online, Cards reviews, Card Decks, Card of the week, Card decks of the week, and much more. 
 681,000 cards offered for trade! More than 5400 active users, Information about more than 100,000 
 different cards, Trading offered for 43 games and over 700 expansion sets.
This feels like pretty blatant advertising--is this allowed?  --BonnySwan 20:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "referrer_name=patrick" Sigh. Cleaned it up. -- Snagari 09:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement Text 

message: In response to the note placed over the top: in what way can / should sources be added to info like this? It is mainly a list of card sets & books, the accuracy of each piece of this info can be verified by looking at these products themselves. They don't seize to exist simply because there is no official published catalog of them. How does wikipedia want to deal with such a situation? Should they simply be labeled "source" in some way?
(Note that the chances of an official catalog emerging are zero. As the piece says, the manufacturer has lost the license. Therefore they have nothing to gain and are not even allowed to promote these products anymore.) -- 18:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added citation from Collectible Card Games Checklist & Price Guide (2003 edition), a catalog of all the collectible card games published in the US, plus some other source. If there are no objection I will remove the Unreferenced template.--Moroboshi (talk) 12:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Horicon, Wisconsin

message: added some information to link this article with that on the Horicon Public Library ShannonCB (talk) 23:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

message: I had been removing the section about Horicon on Unsolved Mysteries concerning a haunted house in Horicon, Wisconsin. There has been no citations and the section is not encyclopedic. I hope the anon editor(s) will respond on the article's talk page instead of putting uncited materials in the Horicon, Wisconsin article. Thank you-RFD (talk) 10:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for your comment. Unless the Horicon haunted house is open for tours-I do not think there should be any mention of it in the article. USN1977 was right in bringing up the privacy and publicity issues. There are better things that Horicon is known for like the Horicon Marsh. Thank you-RFD (talk) 00:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horicon on Unsolved Mysteries 

message: I restored a deletion of most of the information about notable Horicon native, Fran Ulmer. She successively became the mayor of Alaska's third largest city, a state rep, the state's only female Lt. Governor, an educator, and then the chancellor of its largest university campus before retiring. Reducing her description solely to "politician" seems unnecessarily minimalist, in particular compared to descriptions of other notable Horicon natives.
:In particular, compared to other notable Horicon natives, her extensive description is effusive. Why? The "Notables" list is just a list, nothing more. Anyone who wants to know more about someone in the list can click on the link. That's what wikilinks are for. 32.218.47.31 (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fran Ulmer edit
Talk:Hudson, Wisconsin

message: Seriously, whomever keeps entering random characters or cute greetings in random locations needs to stop.meccaneer 04:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: All the lists of facts, dates, and statistics in this article are quite informative. But there are little or no descriptions about what it's like to live in Hudson. The article on Northfield, Minnesota is a great example of providing local color; the way the sights, sounds, and even the smells (Malt-O-Meal)are described give of rich picture of life in that community. However, there is nothing like that in this article.
I've visited the city of Hudson many times, and I have a general (though not completely accurate) view of the town. I could try to provide some local color in this article; however, I probably would not be able to give as accurate description as would someone who has lived in Hudson all their life. One question though: if some statements (exempla gratia "Much of First Street runs along the beautiful St. Croix riverfront.") are ascertained through personal observation, how am I supposed to cite references to comply with Wikipedia's policy on references?-RalphRedFox 21:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You aren't supposed to add unverifiable information to Wikipedia at all. See WP:V for more details. That sort of information would be great in a personal essay about the town, but not in an encyclopedia. Feel free to leave a comment on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers.  --Gimme danger 12:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Color 
Talk:Utricularia

message: You asked about what to do with the long list: making a separate long-list page is one idea, though maybe another is to use a two- or three-column table, which would significantly condense the whole section... not something that has a lot of visible formatting, just something like: "Post-punk bands (2000s era)" or the band list for post-hardcore. That way you wouldn't have to split up the article, and it would probably still be very presentable. I made a quick example list for Ultricularia: User:Tarnas/listexample... though again this may not be what you're looking for, just a suggestion. —Tarnas 23:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *No problem, I'm glad you like the idea.    In this case though your List of Utricularia species is probably best, it's much easier to retain the images that way. —Tarnas 02:18, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long list 

message: At the moment this article has 2 different types of inline citations, a large number of footnotes and 3 following the more conventional method - it would be good to have all of them in the same format. Thoughts? I'm happy to make the changes once a solution is agreed upon. Cheers, Kotare 21:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, footnotes were rarely used in the early days of Wikipedia, so many older articles simply list references. However, that reference information is still useful and will of course need to stay. The footnotes should all be converted over to the newer footnote style using the FullReference tags. Thanks for offering to do that! --NoahElhardt 00:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing issues 

message: The exclusion of West Africa is not justified. See e.g. records in local floras
Lisowski, 2009, Flore de la Republique de Guinee, 
Akoegninou et al., 2006, Flore Analytique du Bénin,
Lebrun et al., 1991, Catalogue des plantes vasculaires du Burkina Faso,
or in GBIF
http://data.gbif.org/species/3172398/
Parts of North America should also be added to the genus'distribution.
--Marco Schmidt (talk) 14:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution map
Talk:Possible Peru

message: I don't understand why this article is listed under the english name of the party. I believe it should be titled Perú Posible. Kmorrow 20:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is the English wikipedia. --Descendall 23:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I now believe that this page should be called Perú Posible. --Descendall 03:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I checked it over and it looks fine now. Kmorrow 20:05, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed copyedit notice 

message: I'm new around. I don't know if this is irrelevant, but I think "Possible Peru" is a more accurate translation of Perú Posible. I didn't want to change it before asking around, (also, I don't know how). Please tell me what you think. 201.230.243.168 21:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title: Possible Peru?
Category talk:Mythology

message: :Category:Mythology's full description is 
:Mythology is the study of myths: stories of a particular culture that it believes to be true and which feature a specific religious or belief system.
::For more information, see the article about Mythology.
and the essential elements of that have been in place over a year -- since about 2 weeks after the Cat system took off.  The language derives from our article Mythology, where it dates in essence from almost 3 years ago.
Noah's Ark has recently been removed from this Cat, with the only reason given being an edit summary reading 
: rv; pick a less offensive term
I am pointing out at Talk:Noah's Ark that here, and not in main-namespace articles that meet the criteria of the description, is where any such problem could be addressed. --Jerzy·t 21:15, 2005 August 2 (UTC)
Codex Sinaiticus said on Talk:Noah's Ark that what they want is a case of removing 
: an inappropriate or offensive category; this happens all the time on wikipedia.  Try leaving it to the reader to decide whether or not he feels this is mythology, instead of trying to make his mind up for him, which usually isn't going to be effective anyway.  Stick with verifiable, referenced assertions and above all, the principle of neutrality (this always wins on wikipedia with any pov that is controversial); throwing a "mythology" tag up is just a backhanded form of pov pushing in this case, especially as a great number of people disagree.  The definition at the article mythology makes it quite clear that this is a term only used for stories that could not have any truth to them, and is a way of implying this; therefore it is pov and should be removed in the paramount interest of maintaining NPOV without provoking cries of 'vandalism'...
Copied to Category talk:Mythology, since it is appropriate to pursue it here, but not there. --Jerzy·t 19:53, 2005 August 3 (UTC)
According to the definition, and to the dictionary.comm definition and existing examples, placeing Noah's Ark in the category is 100% legitimate. FestivalOfSouls 20:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I'm sorry, but is it necessary to sport this in-your-face warning template? It appears to be directed at morons. As a reader, I don't like being treated as a moron. Also, whatever we do, can we transclude it rather than copy-pasting it everywhere? That would make stylistic changes ever so much easier. dab (ᛏ) 09:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTE

message: :Category:Mythography is in :Category:Mythology; :Category:Mythology is in :Category:Mythography; this is recursive and probably wrong! Which is a subcategory of the other? Robert Greer (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cross-posted from Category:Mythography
Talk:ABC1 (British and Irish TV channel)

message: From the 8th of February ABC TV Australia will be renamed ABC1 as the channel which this article is written on is now dissolved it is now not as important so could this article be renamed ABC1 (UK) so that the ABC TV Australia Can be renamed ABC1. Samualm (talk) 03:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with that --AJFurnell (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree, let ABC TV to move here, as now that ABC1 in defunct. --AxG @ ►talk 17:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I have now moved the article appropriately. I have also redirected the 'ABC1' page to 'ABC TV', until the channel is officially renamed to 'ABC1' next month. Stickeylabel (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only just seen this move.  Whilst a move is perhaps appropriate, I dont think the new name of the UK article as in the UK ABC1 also refers to social groupings. Perhaps ABC1 (UK television channel) is more appropriate? Pit-yacker (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming of article 

message: I did the timetable of shows on the article but I'm not 100% sure about the programming. Sorry if there is, I will try and sort it out if I find anySamaster1991 22:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timetable 

message: Can someone please enter the company who makes In Justice, as I am unsure and the article looks messy and incomplete without it. I am refereing to the section about what shows ABC1 currently airs.
Tomm123messenger 14:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Justice

message: Dominic carey- ABC1 is to be axed on all platforms. Re-read the Broadcast article. It states: 'Walt Disney Television is to axe US entertainment channel abc1, which has a valuable Freeview slot'. Cheers,
TopGearDog 11:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure