lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thelesperma filifolium

message: I see UtherSRG removed the interwiki links between the Wikispecies and Wikipedia pages. Would you care to explain why? Wikispecies is a more appropriate place for the technical aspects of each species, Wikipedia for the general aspects. A user interested in knowing what Greenthread is or where it grows would likely see the Wikipedia article, while a hobbyist or expert may be more interested in the taxonomy in the Wikispecies article. It's important that a user be able to find this information if he's looking for it, which is the reason for the disambiguation-like interwiki link I added at the top. I see no reason to remove it. // Pathoschild 16:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't remove them, I made them correct. Links from the en: 'pedia to species: are done using a template . Links from species: to the en: 'pedia are done via a "bald" interwiki link: en:"name of en: article". - UtherSRG (talk) 12:44, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I noticed that later. >_> // Pathoschild 13:12, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki links

message: I've integrated the article with Wikispecies and copyedited the remainder for Wikipedia. However, I didn't add any of the information originally linked to (though not included). The information is now categorised rather arbitrarily into what I consider logical headings, though they may need to be added to or changed. // Pathoschild 23:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting

message: The photograph in this article about greenthread, Thelesperma filifolium, appears to show instead either Coreopsis tinctoria or Coreopsis basalis. 
Compare the photographs of greenthread on the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center's page at
https://www.wildflower.org/gallery/species.php?id_plant=THFI
with those of Coreopsis tinctoria at
https://www.wildflower.org/gallery/species.php?id_plant=COTI3
and those of Coreopsis basalis at
https://www.wildflower.org/gallery/species.php?id_plant=COBA2.
VisualDelights (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seemingly misidentified photograph of a greenthread flower head
Talk:Defense (military)

message: Not sure what has gone on here, but this is pretty piss poor for an encyclopAEdia (yes you've also spelt this incorrectly.)
Don't give me any bullcrap about american/british differences. English is called English because it is the language of England; our spellings are correct!
Oh shut up.
:Blimey, I unanimously agree with you, mate :-)
:However, the policy thinks otherwise (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English), and we must respect it here... --Alexander Ivashkin 20:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really spelt wrong, just there are two ways. defense(US Spelling) or defence(International Spelling). If the article makes it clear then there is some understanding on why such articles appear spelt 'wrong' to many. ChessCreator (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should point out that as defence is the worldwide spelling of the word then that should be used, since the entire world uses said spelling. Defense refers solely to the US, and is therefore unrepresentitive of the rest of the world. --J.StuartClarke (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an International/worldwide spelling? Who says? --64.149.41.29 (talk) 21:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Er, why have you spelt defense wrong? 

message: Why is it referred to as "defence"? I say we should change it to American spellings, as is the title.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.250.51 (talk) 02:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  If the title is "Defense"...
Talk:Manual command to line of sight

message: I'm not sure that I agree with the first generation comment - surely Inertial Navigation (gyroscope and stopwatch) was the first generation of guidance for missiles ? Some random IP made the changes (also to SACLOS and Fire and Forget. Before I revert does anyone have any comments ?
Megapixie 00:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First generation ?
Talk:Coffee roasting

message: In the section "Flavors", the percentages (1.37, 1.31, and 1.31) given for caffeine content in different coffee roasts should have a unit (mg/g) or at least a qualification as to whether the measurement is being done by volume or weight (or some other method). Clemep8 (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualifier/Units needed when percentages given 

message: The coffee roaster audio sample sounds very similar to a Nine Inch Nails song. However, luckily the resemblance is not to the extent of a copyright violation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason P Jackson (talk • contribs) 04:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Coffee Roaster Audio Sample 

message: The second paragraph of this section introduces the proper name "Burns" without citing a source. Who is Burns? NateDies (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:The Daily Toreador

message: Will be working on updating this page with new stats and information regarding old awards received. Etc. 75.110.211.16 (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Growth

message: If anyone has or can obtain the newspaper's logo, please feel free to add it. Thanks! Maltmomma (chat)  00:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the logo and the newspaper infobox. --Myles Long/cDc 16:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: I agree that the article needs to be bulked up. However, if it is determined that The Daily Toreador is not notable, then all articles for all college student newspapers need to be deleted as well. It's not fair or equitable to say that such-and-such college's student newspaper is notable but the one for Texas Tech is not. --Wordbuilder 00:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at a random sampling of 15 Wikipedia articles for other student newspapers and none of them contained a tag regarding notability. Some of the articles contained more information than the one for The Daily Toreador. Some contained less. Others, about the same. Currently there are 188 articles in the Category:Student newspapers published in the United States. Therefore, if no one presents a reasonable objection, I will remove the notability tag from the article associate with this discussion page. --Wordbuilder 15:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:The Battalion

message: If anyone has or can obtain the newspaper's logo, please feel free to add it. Thanks! Maltmomma (chat)  00:22, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added — BQZip01 — talk 21:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:Methadone clinic

message: Group 28 (Carolina, Justin, Andy, Sanam): We plan to update the federal requirements for having methadone clinics, improving citations, and adding additional detail on evidence of a pharmacist being involved. CarolinaRyklansky 8:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have edited the first two paragraphs of this page. I am surprised that the fact that this article has NO sources hasn't attracted any attention up to this point.  For now, I just corrected and added some stuff in, I will cite sources and edit the rest at a later time.  Lisamarie 14:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing article, April 2007 

message: Group 2
• Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…
  - In my opinion the edits made by the group are most certainly neutral. They stick to the facts and have done a good job at sticking to the facts outlining why methadone utilized and how it needs to be administered to comply with federal regulations. The info is presented in a manner that only offers information but no recommendation which keeps it neutral. Ranaran35 (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: - Yes, the group looked for citations that are easily accessible by the public. I think more citations after claims such as distinction between public vs private clinics and a citation for the 2004 study under "Effectiveness" would help people find the source of information more easily. Chellefsh (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCSF CP133 Pharmacy Student Peer Reviews
Talk:List of Fox Broadcasting Company affiliates (by U.S. state)

message: Why is KDFW described in the list as the "flagship station"? Wouldn't that be WNYW in New York?--Matthew Humphreys 00:28, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As the has been no response to this I have removed the "flagship station" notation. the WNYW-TV article clearly indicates that it (WNYW) is the network flagship. If anyone knows different, please revert my edit and explain here. - Matthew Humphreys 10:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Missing FOX affiliates on this page.
WXIX Channel 19 in Cincinnnati, Ohio.
Casino17 19:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's there - it's licensed to a community in Kentucky. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 21:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing affiliates 

message: Technically and legally speaking XETV Channel 6 is not a U.S. television station because it is licensed by the Secretary of Communications and Transportation of Mexico and not the Federal Communications Commission, also their transmitter is located atop Monte San Antonio in Tijuana. As clarification just because the station maintains its offices and studios in San Diego does not make them a San Diego television station even though that's the target market they are hitting. Therefore may I suggest that it be moved to the following section in the article, 3 Fox channels outside the United States - 3.1 Mexico. Thank you for your time. 96.243.189.48 (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  XETV location in this list
Talk:Top 10: The Forty-Niners

message: Nice job tidying this page up, whoever was responsible! Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker 00:30, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice job

message: I think more emphasis should be placed on the disturbing revelations of Betty Doesgood. She was forcibly removed from her home and taken to Neopolis simply because she was clever. Brr. What a way to start a city
Lots42 04:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betty Doesgood
Talk:Unimog

message: The article claims without citing any reference that "The Mercedes-Benz G-Class shares some features of the Unimog..." The Steyr-designed G-Wagen has none of the configuration or component features of any generation or size of Unimog. What was intended here, and where is the justification?
Brian_abp  —Preceding undated comment added 01:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  G-Wagen similarity? 

message: The Suzuki Jimny#High altitude world record article includes:
: On December 13th, 2019, Jeschke reclaimed the record with a Mercedes Benz Unimog.https://mbs.mercedes-benz.com/en/special-trucks/allterrain-mobile-homes/a-performance-that-breaks-records.html
I believe to add this to the article we'd need independent verification via WP:RS. --Marc Kupper|talk 05:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be part of the Unimog 437.4 article. Actually, only few Unimogs could operate normally under "mountain conditions": Most Unimogs are fitted with naturally aspirated engines, which means that they lose power at high altitudes. Under the conditions as described in the source, an Unimog 435's engine would possibly have like 40 kW of power, which I believe is insufficient for driving off-road in an Unimog 435. Placing the "altitude record information" into this article would possibly make the reader believe that any Unimog model could drive up mountains that high, while actually only few Unimog models can. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altitude record 

message: :Something like 53 images far surpasses what is needed in the article. A point of jumping off the proverbial cliff into a large collection of images that strays from "encyclopedic context" seems self-evident. --  Otr500 (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Kappa Alpha Order

message: Last paragraph of section text as of 11/4/19 reads as follows:
"In 2019, the fraternity suspended three members of its University of Mississippi chapter after they posted a photo on an Instagram account showing them posing with guns next to a bullet-riddled sign memorializing Emmett Till, a 14-year-old African-American lynched in Mississippi in 1955.[27] The local U.S. Attorney said that the matter had been referred for further investigation to the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice.[27] The students withdraw from the university, but they are not charged with a hate crime.[28]"
Fn 28 links to the following: "White Supremacists Caught at Emmett Till Memorial Making Propaganda Film Jackson Free Press, Nov 2, 2019; retrieved Nov 3, 2019."
Comments: 
1. Last sentence of paragraph is ungrammatical; presumably the verb should be "withdrew."
2. The article linked by fn 28 says nothing about either factual claim in the final sentence of the paragraph, the claim that (a) the students withdrew from Ole Miss or the one that (b) they have not been, seemingly implying that they will not be, charged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.103.115.62 (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  KA order > Accusations of racism
Talk:Armed Forces of Armenia

message: It seems as if somebody has copied and pasted most of the tables with slight adjustments onto the Armenian Armed Forces article, along with organizing it according to the branches. I like this idea, as Air Defense is a separate branch and its equipment chart has no place on the Army's article.
However, I do believe it is necessary to solve the issue of having duplicate tables on two pages regarding the exact same thing. Would an equipment article be needed, or shall we just delete the tables on one of the pages? - This has also been posted on the Army article's talk page. Retaurn (talk) 07:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the general article of the Armenian Armed Forces. The article of the Armenian Army contains only the land forces branch of the Armenian Armed Forces. If you think the tables shouldn't be in two articles at the same time(it can by the way) you can remove them from the army's page. Not from this one. --AOnline (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables and a new wiki article 

message: The second paragraph of the lead says the Prime Minister is the Commander-in-Chief, while the infobox says its the President. They can't both be, does anyone know for sure? Archives908 (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commander-in-Chief
Talk:Arndt Pekurinen

message: "Pekurinen refused to wear a uniform or carry arms, and was therefore executed in Suomussalmi, becoming the last person to be sentenced to death in Finland."
Is this true? It can't be true if he really was executed in 1941, because there had to be executions after that as Finland was in war until 1945. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.222.50.237 (talk • contribs).
*It is the version of the story I've heard, but I am unsure if it is true or not, now that you mention it. --Agamemnon2 05:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Executions

message: I added a pretty unimpressive link at the bottom of this page so at least it has a source. I just hope the link didn't just get its information off of here. --KobaVanDerLubbe 00:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The site you linked to is a Wikipedia mirror, evident at the bottom of the page. I've removed the link. ›mysid (☎∆) 09:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: I think that the name of the park in  Helsinki should be "Pekurinen" not "Pekurisen" as typed. I haven't changed it as I know nothing about the Finnish language. I did change one line (about his orders to wear a uniform and carry a weapon)that looked as though it had been translated from another language, to make the English style flow better--AssegaiAli 03:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pekurisen is correct, as the word undergoes consonant mutation when declined in genitive ("Arndt Pekurinen's Park"). Thanks for the corrections! ›mysid (☎∆) 04:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Park
Talk:François Furet

message: *Could someone confirm the tennis ball story. Seems odd to me. Hektor 01:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Circumstances of death

message: *the overview of his analysis also seems a little lacking. i've read furet, and i'll try to look into the french article and flesh this one out more, but i'm certainly not an expert. anyone studied furet more closely? also, need to add more on his break from Les Annales (for which there is apparently no page on the english wikipedia) --ponyboy 05:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Overview of his analysis

message: * Is there a photo of M. Francois Furet that could be inserted into the article? Also is there a photo of his wife, Debroah? for it was she who made the English translation of his book "The passing of an illusion" (1999). Tonyob 11:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Kagami mochi

message: I've just looked at the diff for the recent edits. First, what evidence is there that "daidai" are scarce? It's not a scarce fruit at all as far as I know since lots of people grow them in their gardens. There is one daidai tree near my house. Second, the name "daidai" does indeed mean "generations": I put that on the daidai page, if you'd care to look, and the Japanese wikipedia page will confirm it. The name comes from the fact that the tree stays on the fruit for several years if left to itself. The kanji is just ateji. And anyway, as I've been saying since this discussion started, there is not really any convincing evidence of more than two mochi except "I've seen them", so that edit should not have been made either. --DannyWilde 10:03, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerned again about edits

message: I have made a request on Japanese wikipedia for clarification. See . --DannyWilde 10:33, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested on Japanese page

message: I was wondering if anyone knew of a tradition of eating oshiruko on the day of kagami biraki.  Every year, I ask my parents why I can't substitute my ozoni with oshiruko (as the latter is sweeter and one of my favorite things to eat), and every year, I am told that oshiruko is to be eaten on the day of the kagami biraki and not on New Year's Day.  I've read that oshiruko is eaten on New Year's Day in Kagawa Prefecture, so maybe it's a regional thing?  My parents are both from Saitama Prefecture, by the way. Shu ster (talk) 23:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kagami Biraki & Oshiruko

message: It is traditionally broken and eaten in a Shinto ritual called kagami biraki (mirror opening) on the second Saturday or Sunday of January. In Okinawa NO! This year it's January 31st (same as in Vietnam) and hence the ritual won't happen before February. So the explanation is not valid for the whole Japanese territory. Just saying. :) -andy 77.7.124.51 (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Okinawa (et. al.), it's different!
Talk:John de Menteith

message: The article says John was refered to as "Fause Menteith" and then explains it in two different paragraphs as meaning False Mentieth or Menteith the treacherous.  Does anyone know which is correct?69.141.37.100 (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fause mulitple meanings?
Talk:List of nicknames used in cricket

message: Please provide citations for your entries, otherwise they go. BLP, and all that. In addition, I have removed Toshack for Doctrove as the citation points to Toshack being another NAME - it says it is an "also known as" not a nickname. WillE (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 69.165.248.80

message: Come on people. Looks like every entry since I last cleaned this page up is un-cited. It is not hard - either cite it or do not enter it. WillE (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Title says it all. WillE (talk) 22:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another in the semi-regular series of "Don't make an entry if you can't be bothered to add a citation." 

message: Why All Alphabatically classification of Cricketers is Mismatched??? Utsav kapadiya (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is a poorly maintained article where editors come and add nicknames used once or that they have made up themselves for their favourite players and don't care if they leave the article in a mess. There are plenty of bogus / fake nicknames on here and anyone who has tried maintaining it has got fed up and left it to rot (I count myself amongst this number). Spike 'em (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rearranged each section into alphabetical order using their Defaultsort names. This is generally their LAST name, although due to different naming conventions around the word, some people such as Shakib Al Hasan, may appear to be incorrectly ordered, even though they are correct. - Arjayay (talk) 16:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering
Talk:U Make Me Wanna (Blue song)

message: This is a Jadakiss song featuring Mariah Carey as a guest, but the article is written as if it were Mariah's own song. Also, the article fails to establish notablility other than the fact that song was a Top 30 hit. --FuriousFreddy 02:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a Jadakiss single, so it seems very odd to mention Mariah Carey first. Anyway, I've tidied it up a little and removed some of the POV. Extraordinary Machine 22:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The infobox should mention both artists, so Ive fixed that up. Agreed with EM and Fred. This is a Jadakiss single first, a Mariah single second. Ive add more Jadakiss info and done some tidying too. I think the POV should be gone nowOmegaWikipedia 23:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Cberlet and Nobs01/Workshop

message: This recent dispute has somewhat sidetracked me; I was hoping to write articles on the historical method and other aspects of historiography, but perhaps they may be spun off from this attack upon the integrity of valid primary source documents.  Please see Using documents in historical research, some easy pointers, but it is putting the cart before the horse because some understanding of the method and process of identifying a valid historical document should be known before attempting to use it in research.  I welcome any assistance in collaboration.  Thank you.  nobs 02:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn, I see somebody else created the historical method article 5 weeks ago; I've been meaning to do it for months. Perhaps we can draw upon it.  nobs 02:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Valid historical documents