lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Three Comrades (1938 film)

message: According to this article (http://news.yahoo.com/4-ways-hollywood-helped-nazis-193400658.html) the movie was changed to make it more palatable to Nazi officials (who otherwise wouldn't let it be released in Germany).Historian932 (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie was edited to please Nazi censors
Talk:Sex Madness

message: A Pornography wiki project template has been added to this talk page, but having seen the exploitation film (which is available on the Internet Archive via the link in the article), I am not sure if Sex Madness can be classified as pornography except in the loosest definition, especially since real pornographic films existed when this film was made. Just a comment. Deanlaw (talk) 19:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pornography?
Talk:Darklighter

message: * Yes, these two articles should be merged as they are about exactly the same thing Gnj 18:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Question: Does anyone know in which episode Tracker Darklighters were first shown? Artemisboy 18:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracker Darklighters 

message: Who is the Darklighter Leader?  He is one of Significant Darklighters.  I want to know more about this guy because he the the leader and a Significant Darklighter.
* He was only shown once, and it was in the episode The Day the Magic Died. He doesn't say much but appears next to the Wizard when the Charmed Ones meet to discuss why magic has disappeared from the world. He has dirty blonde hair and is wearing black. I believe I have a screen capture of him. I'll try to upload it on the Darklighter page for future reference. Artemisboy 21:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darklighter Leader
Talk:Polans (western)

message: The actual Polans are first mentioned at the turn of the 10. to 11. centuryPolans, Polani  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:C800:DAD8:21D6:6088:D7A9:2D50 (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polans first mentioned in 10. to 11. Century
Talk:Harvard Divinity School

message: Henry David Thoreau is listed as an alumnus of Harvard Divinity School. Can anyone confirm this? I thought he only graduated from the college, and I'm having trouble finding any references to his study at the Divinity School.
:I don't know if Thoreau ever attended HDS.  But one thing to watch out for is that HDS didn't grant degrees at that time.  See, for example, the entries for Jared Sparks, James Walker, and Thomas Hill here: . - Eb.hoop 20:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Alumni

message: Is Harvard Divinity School still a predominantly Protestant institution ? There appears to be Protestants of every kind and comparatively few Catholics or Orthodox Christians in the institution. It does however exhibit interest in other non-Christian religions, such as Hinduism, Judaism and Islam. I saw it had recently named a priest as its leader, but it is only a first.  ADM (talk) 05:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Protestant ?

message: Quote from article: "(Princeton Theological Seminary, having been founded as a Presbyterian institution in 1812 and Andover Theological Seminary, the oldest graduate school of theology in the United States)"
So, what about them? The sentence seems incomplete. Please fix this if you know what is meant. -- 77.7.174.28 (talk) 11:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete sentence 

message: Recent new content re HDS history moved from Unitarian as overweight there, contributor notified. Suspect those editing this HDS page will wish to make further changes. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 03:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History section

message: could not find this source anywhere including search of university library: Tarango, Angela PhD. "Unitarians."Trinity University. San Antonio. 16 Feb. 2011.   Seems fake.   Deleted it and content based on it that I would not find other sources for.  At same time removed off topic stuff, like paragraph on Channing and Unitarianism that has nothing to do with HDS per se. Jytdog (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  taranga source
Talk:Mark McClellan

message: I've added a section on Dr. McClellan's role in the Plan B controversy, with quotes from sworn statements by both FDA staff and Dr. McClellan. This is one of the 2 most important and controversial things to happen during his tenure (the other being the Medicare prescription plan, which should probably be added as well), so it seemed to warrant inclusion. Comments? MastCell 17:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan B section
Talk:Joel Stein

message: IP editors keep returning to the "Controversial columns" section of the article a paragraph about a column Stein wrote in December 2008 entitled "How Jewish is Hollywood?". There is, however, no indication that the column is even notable in any way, much less "controversial". If someone wants to make a case that this specific column is notable, using reliable secondary sources, please do so here.
I've been monitoring this article for two and a half years, and it's quite apparent that a number of people really haven't liked some of Stein's columns. These people apparently feel the need to respond by coming to this article, and inserting negative information about Stein, or the columns in question. I know nothing about Stein, and do not read his writing. I do, however, know that this article is a Biography of a Living Person, and all material in it must comply with the WP:BLP policy (which I have indeed read). Before making any further edits, I strongly recommend all editors here review Wikipedia:BLP#Writing style and Wikipedia:BLP#Semi-protection, protection, and blocking, as I will continue to strictly enforce them, as I have been doing. Jayjg (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "How Jewish is Hollywood" column, "controversy", and [[WP:BLP]] 

message: This article is really unbalanced and basically reads like a hate letter to Stein.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.36.92 (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bais 

message: Why is there no bibliography? Does Joel Stein not update his Wikipedia page? If he doesn't care, who will?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.169.184 (talk) 13:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books
Talk:Tanita Tikaram

message: I remember reading a few years back that she doesn't speak to her brother, the actor Ramon. Just wondering if anyone who knows more than I do about Tanita Tikaram wanted to add some sourced info on it? I know it's not a major thing, but it's a point of interest; quite a big thing is made on Joan Fontaine and Olivia de Havilland's pages of their feud. Smurfmeister (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship with Ramon

message: There is no biographical info at http://www.tanita-tikaram.com/, but I note that her Facebook page quotes directly from version of this article saying: "Tanita Tikaram (born 12 August 1969) is a German-born British pop/folk singer-songwriter." This source  describes here as "Britsh". Martinevans123 (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: User:95.147.54.130 is now at 5RR at this article. Some discussion might be more productive? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

text: Pramod Tikaram, father of both Takita and her brother Ramon Tikaram, was a British Army soldier. Is there a Nationality rule for children of British Army born in other countries?  Roamon is described in his article as "British", so I think this may be more appropriate for Tanita also. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality?
Talk:Secondary xylem

message: I don't have really strong feelings about this addition, although I would prefer my version. Do note that the use of names such as Gnetophyta and Cycadophyta is a notable PoV, which in a number of cases could be avoided by going to the lowest rank (like Ginkgo biloba, which is universally accepted, unlike the PoV Ginkgophyta). Brya 18:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You will find that I usually try to use botanical terminology and nomenclature very precisely. Use of the terms "Ginkgophyta", "Gnetophyta", and "Cycadophyta" for their respective groups is consistent with the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.  Phylocode notwithstanding, I think it's safe to say that most systematic botanists still follow the ICBN when it comes to formal botanical nomenclature.  I did not use a lower rank because both Gnetophyta and Cycadophyta have several extant genera and I like my lists to be consistent, and I am not aware of any other valid names for these taxa at the rank of division. MrDarwin 20:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I think I see what you mean, in which case point taken: under some classifications these groups may rank no higher than order (Ginkgoales, Cycadales, Gnetales) and another group may represent the division (phylum), e.g., Tracheophyta. MrDarwin 20:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. Lots of different classifications have existed, and some will still be held. All in all, only a few genera are involved. Brya 21:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: PS. It is not a matter of being consistent, but on what one is consistent in. Abstracting to the level of division may go over well in some quarters. However, it is much more informative to be as specific as possible, at least in dealing with cases (and especially with exceptions). When I am speaking about Ginkgo biloba I know exactly what I am dealing with, but Ginkgophyta are something else entirely. Surely this will include fossil Ginkgo species, but also any families, orders and subclasses of fossil plants that any palaeobotanist ever included there or may include there in the future. I would be quite uncomfortable about making a precise statement on the characters of a division. Brya 12:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:University of Nottingham Malaysia

message: I have semi-protected this article for a period of 3 months, owing to ongoing, extensive vandalism from unregistered users, and in response to OTRS ticket #2008041010002475. - Mark 06:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection 

message: This article is far from perfect or anything remotely good but I think it would do if were to get peer reviewed. Get fresh input aye?MetalDimples338 (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the article 
Category talk:The CW original programming

message: Even though The CW was just announced that should not mean that we should all add all our favorite WB and UPN shows to this category, at the announcement viewers were actually given a list of shows that will most likely appear on the Network. (although I don't believe any of these have been confirmed)
America's Next Top Model 
Beauty and the Geek 
Smallville 
Gilmore Girls 
Supernatural 
Veronica Mars 
Everybody Hates Chris 
Girlfriends 
Reba 
WWE Smackdown 
I think these should be the only ones metioned in the category untill more info is avalable.
Oh and thanks to User:David Bix for the list Deathawk 19:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shows
Talk:Ecclesiastical jurisdiction

message: The original article in the 1911 Britannica contained much that was unnecessary--I utilized only a portion in the creation of the article. At the same time, I acknowledge and look forward to further additions (if only I had the time myself).--eleuthero 19:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Thank you so much for breaking down the various categories!  As you saw, I wanted to link to this article from Joan of Arc, but saw there was no explicit heading.  You've not only divided it, but made it clear.  I feel like a motivated reader can now get a sense of what an ecclesiastical ordinary judge is, and IMO this change, along with your addition of the link, strengthens the Joan of Arc article. Wtfiv (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordinary Judge
Talk:Ab Initio Software

message: The warning that the article "reads like an ad" is probably based on the use of 2 or 3 superlatives that probably should be removed, but should not be used as an argument for deleting the article. The company exists and the information in the article is accurate (and I am not connected with the company).
Agree. The article is not very good, but it's not a press release either. Needs some cleaning before that tag gets removed though. Saladpope 16:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: I moved the page from Ab Initio to the current heading Ab initio (Company). I made re-directs earlier that were leading to this page because of the upper case in one letter, I moved the page so there wouldn't be any mistakes because of the case its written in. The new title is hopefully more descriptive and less misleading.--Theo10011 (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I have made a few small changes to improve what is in this article. I am happy to make further improvements, if specific problems can be identified with this page. However, that will likely be limited to correcting the limited information that is present as opposed to adding much more as I am under a NDA, as are all that work the the product. --Paul Thompson (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well there are all sorts of issues. The best would be to be written in normal English for example with nouns and verbs in each sentence, not bullets and buzzwords. All technical terms should be wiki-linked and spelled out in full at first use. All claims need to be verifiable via inline citations (at least one per paragraph). Otherwise need to be removed. I tried to guess what the company did, but their web site seems to totally obfuscate their products, and just takes several minutes to load a flash ad that gives some vague possible use cases. My guess is they seem to do software, and are located near Boston, but hard to find anything more, after 18 years in operation? W Nowicki (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions?
Talk:Eco-anarchism

message: Eco anarchism, Green Anarchism, and to some extent, Primitive Anarchism all can be grouped together. There are some people who feel they need to emphasize an aspect of anarchism, relate it to the focus of their efforts and ideals they strive for, and perhaps to help other people understand them too, since "anarchism" by itself has strong connotations of chaos, violence and general negativity in  mainstream culture. Other common descriptive labels used are Social Anarchism and Feminist Anarchism.
:Primitivist anarchism is significantly different to have an article of its own (although it's actually a branch of green/eco). I don't think anyone disputes that this and green anarchism are effectively the same thing. The question is, which name should we use? I tend to prefer "green", although eco has a slight edge in Google results. Sarge Baldy 21:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: is the kibutz in Israel a good example of eco-anarchism?
either way you should list some examples on this page so people know of some eco-anarchism in action sort of thing!!!!!!!!
:I was about to mention it. Not to mention that the kibbutzes actually work, they're not some luddite fantasy. Joffeloff 17:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  ummm... only a handful (or less) of very unusual kibbutzim in Israel even ;lean in the direction of either anarchism of sustainable permaculture. There is a small and growing move in that direction, but i imagine some of the eco-village efforts in europe must be closer to a working model. Jethrobrice 15:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a real life example 

message: Anarchists input would be appreciated at Talk:End_of_civilization. There seems to be some disagreement what the end of civilization actually means. nirvana2013 17:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on [[end of civilization]]
Talk:Coat of arms of Western Sahara

message: I've got a nice SVG remake of this image just about done, but I need the Arabic to copy & paste into it.  Anybody got it handy? :) ¦ Reisio 19:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Coat of arms of Western Sahara.png]] Arabic text? 

message: I don't get the pluralization.  There's only one CoA, AFAIK, regardless of whether you refer to it as that of the SADR or WS. ¦ Reisio 03:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat...s? 

message: Compromise How about we avoid the entire political scenario about who-controls-what-and-where and we just discuss the coat of arms itself in its own article? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 02:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Asides
Talk:A Marriage Proposal

message: * Stepan Stepanovitch Tschubukov, but 
* Ivan Vassiliyitch Lomov?
Why the full version for Stepanovitch but the short version for Vassiliyitch?  The full patronymic of Vassily is Vassilievich, although it gets shortened in speech to "Vassiliyich".  Just as Stepanovich gets shortened to "Stepanich". 
I'm going to correct them, as well as fixing the spellings: eg. -itch > ich, etc.   --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  00:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Patronymics

message: There are obvious errors on this page.
I have no interest in pointing them out or making edits. 
You figure them out.
\\ 104.157.227.172 (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors
Talk:Soleidae

message: I don't believe all species of Sole have both eyes on one side and swim with the blind side facing downward. --DelftUser 19:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I invite you to take it up with fishbase], where they say "Both eyes on the right side of the head" with no qualifiers like "most". Stan 21:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Indeed any taxonomist will tell you that one of the diagnostic characters of all flatfishes, not just sole spp., is having both eyes on one side of the head. The book to look at is the recent flatfish book by R. Gibson (Flatfishes: Biology and Exploitation, published by Blackwell).Celticbattlepants 21:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Facedown Records

message: To my knowledge JLJ was never in Point Of Recognition.  He was, however, in Through It All.  A christian band that was (arguably) an obvious ploy to cash in on the money christian hardcore was raking in.  Besides, this is an article about Facedown, why does there need to be a stab on JLJ? Since you don't name any member of any other band mentioned it makes it even more out of place to bring him up--66.240.89.45 19:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Lockjaw 

message: what the heck does this in the Facedown Fest section mean??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.236.118.21 (talk) 01:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "including David Baugh with his bed with a hole in the middle of it" 

message: Hey would someone help me find all the albums released under Facedown, Strike First, and Dreamt? --Metalworker14 (Yo) 19:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facedown Discography
Template talk:User freebsd

message: This is the older of the two templates and they are pretty much the same thing.  I think it makes sense to merge the newer into the older.  Janizary 19:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since noone voiced any objections, I went ahead and did the merger.  Janizary 08:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger
Template talk:Cerebral cortex

message: A few critisms for this template:
Firstly, most text would agree that the 4 lobes of the brain are frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital lobe.
Secondly, the limbic lobe (a term that is rarely used nowadays) might be better renamed the limbic system and be brought lower down the list together with the basal ganglia and insula which are also collections of deep cortical nuclei.
Thirdly, the most glaring error, the amygdala is not part of the basal ganglia and should be classified under the limbic system.
Lastly, the hippocampal formation is also part of the limbic system.
--129.78.64.106 03:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Amygdala belongs to Limbic System

message: I believe Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex should be added to this template, but I'm not sure about the appropriate organization. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
Talk:Captain Shreve High School

message: bit long? first step is less topic headings, more refs and pics...welcome Victuallers 16:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess
Category talk:English cuisine

message: The title of this category is pure humour in itself... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.240.135 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 25 January 2006
: Meh, it won us the Olympics ;) --El Zilcho 14:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't see people getting food poisoning from roast beef... Dev920 23:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  English cuisine? 

message: The following need inclusion on this page:
*Christmas pudding
*Crumble
*Bakewell tart
*Oxtail soup
*Cock-a-leekie soup
*Brown Windsor soup
*Yorkshire pudding
*Toad in the hole
*British cheeses
*Mince pies
*Cowheel pie
*Chorley cake
*Banbury cake
*Sunday roast
*Mint sauce
*Mushy peas
*Spotted dick
*Pork pie
*Gala pie
*Bubble and squeak
*Poor knights
*Devils on horseback
*Shepherd's pie
*Cottage pie
*Stargazer pie
*Kippers
*Cream tea
*Sussex smokies
*Pickled onions
*Piccallili
*Pancakes
*Gravy
*White sauce
*Sage and onion stuffing
*Chutney
*Black pudding
*Jam roly-poly
Starting to dribble now.
Garrick92 16:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just looked at cock-a-leekie soup, and looked up some refs to it online; like here. Which seem to indicate it is more considered a Scottish Soup, the catagory it is under now.121.74.7.9 (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  For inclusion
Talk:Judge (sumo)

message: Isn't the standard transliteration shinpan? --Auximines 19:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Before a "p" the "n" sound is pronounced (and written in roman characters) as an "m" so shimpan is generally regarded as correct.  May be worth making a redirect page for though -- I leave it up to you... Nashikawa 20:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not true that the "n" sound is written as "m" before a "p", this is pretty much obsolete, see the Manual of Style. "m" is only preferred in well-known names such as Asahi Shimbun. A google on 'sumo shimpan' returns about the same number of hits as 'sumo shinpan', so I'm not sure which is preferable. What do you think? --Auximines 09:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinpan or shimpan? 

message: As far as I know, the term shimpan is not specific to sumo, but can be applied to almost every other gendai budo that has competitions. Think kendo, atarashii naginata, judo, karate, iaido... I think this page should be rewritten to reflect that. --Tinctorius 09:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Further than that, the term really just means umpire or referee, so it is also used in baseball, soccer, basketball, etc. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a sumo specific term
Talk:Pant

message: I have cleaned up this article, removing material which is also covered in the article on pants and restructuring it as a disambiguation page.  I also merged the material from the otherwise unreferenced page pant (disambiguation) which can now be deleted.  –Shoaler (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a disambiguation page, and to reach wikipedia norms, it needs to be cleaned up. Internal links should be removed, and any material that should be in an article should be moved to the appropriate article. I think that the "See also" section should be removed too. For proper layout, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). I'll look into it when I have time if no one else does. IronChris  |  (talk) 03:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and merge