lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Rumble (1993)

message: Ric Flair was long gone by the time that Mr. Perfect was eliminated. It was Lawler who helped eliminate Perfect from the outside. Damien Demento and I.R.S. did not get into the ring while the GIant Gonzalez was still there. Lawler was long gone by the time Gonzales made his appearance.
Bob Backlund was lying on the outside after being struck by the Berzerker with a chair and being bodyslammed on the concrete during the whole Gonzalez incident.
I suppose that the Earthquake going after Typhoon was upon the instructions of someone backstage just to liven up the crowd (the crowd was pretty dead by that point in the match) 70.73.26.231 00:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answers 

message: Hogan may very well hold the record. Is there a reliable source for him exceeding Yokozuna's number of eliminations? Thesportster isn't a reliable source. You posted a link to a Royal Rumble (a legitimate link, as it is from the official WWE account), but it appears to be from 1992, and you are stating that Hogan's record is from 1989. Can you offer a source to prove your statement? I don't claim that Yokozuna holds the record, but that statement should stay (because it is cited to a reliable source) until a reliable source states otherwise. As for the redundancy comment, I was referring to the "singles match" statement being repeated in the results table--it is included multiple times to ensure that it will be in the top result regardless of how the table is sorted. GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yokozuna vs. Hogan - who holds the record?
Talk:Steve Sesnick

message: Title. Anybody know? I can't find anything about it on Google. The article says "was", but that's fairly ambiguous. Klayman55 (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK he's still on the right side of the ground. He was in 2012 for sure. Herostratus (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he deceased? 

message: I expanded and rewrote the article. I tried hard to remove material that implied that Sesnick was any kind of villain. I gather that some people think so, but it's the music business and everybody has an ego and everyone is going to make enemies. And the Velvets and that whole scene seem especially catty. 
 
I did leave in a direct quote from Lou Reed where he blames Sesnick for something. I think that's pretty much it. And that's just Reed's opinion. I actually kind of cherry-picked Doug Yule's interview for neutral-sounding material. You could make Yule sound more negative, but its a BLP so we want to err on the side of being kind, and the source for Yule's interview is a little sketchy, and I wouldn't want to use it support any negative info.  
A number of the refs are pretty sketchy for a BLP... I personally have reasonable confidence in them, but according WP:RS rule they don't make it. Since I was careful to not ref anything negative to them, my hair is not on fire about. But if someone wants to remove the material, enh, go ahead I guess. 
BUT there are better sources for this material in books I think. I'm kind of done with this article for now, but if you're unhappy with the refs, rather than deleting the material it'd better go pawing thru google books and digging up refs there.
(May I remind people that you can't go around saying "I heard this guy was a _____" without a ref. This applies to talk pages as well as articles, if its vilification. No no no no. I had to redact some material (technically should be oversighted), and don't do that. It's OK to say "Smith called Jones an embezzler (here's the ref)" but not "I read somewhere that Smith called Jones an embezzler". If it's negative, and you can't be troubled to dig up and lay down the ref --even for a talk page -- maybe don't say it, or at any rate use circumspect and vague language. Herostratus (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Major rewrite
Talk:USS The Sullivans (DDG-68)

message: USS The Sullivan's meets anti-war protest in Irish port...(copy and pasted article removed) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.94.235.2 (talk • contribs) 11:07, July 10, 2006
Is this an encyclopedia entry or the ship's log? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.8.115 (talk • contribs) 16:19, August 15, 2006
:Another copy paste from this article was removed from the article. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of the remaining article seems to have been cut and pasted from this archived article:  http://web.archive.org/web/20050206165024/www.sullivans.navy.mil/ddg68.html  I won't delete it, because there'd be nothing left.  I'm just saying it could definitely use some editing to make it not word-for-word.  Mentor397 (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvios

message: USS Sullivans directs here. What abouit the first USS Sullivans mentioned in the first paragraph of this article?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.64.201.157 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 15 January 2007
: Hmm? USS Sullivans redirects to USS The Sullivans.
:—wwoods 00:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS ''Sullivans'' 

message: Does USS The Sullivans carry SM-3? Not according to this Wikipedia article, however this article says that it DOES carry SM-3: https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/ballistic-missile-defence-and-the-type-45-destroyer/
Is Wikipedia wrong or is the UKDJ article wrong?
And what about SM-6? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.53.74 (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does USS The Sullivans carry SM-3? Or SM-6?
Talk:Omission bias

message: Its worth pointing out that it's a disputed issue in philosophy as to whether this "bias" is in fact rational.  The article should be changed to reflect this. --gregorya--
This has a lot to do with Utilitarian and Kantian ethics, so maybe it should include a link to these articles. 67.37.231.80
What seems biased may not be so biased. I have read the article and it seems only not supported. Used to living in backward countryside will explain a lot of this. Jimmycyang1 13:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These seem heavily biased to me:
"What people often do not realize is that not acting is also a choice and thus actions and inactions should be judged equally. If an omission causes as much harm as an action, then both choices are equally bad."
"the parent is clearly making the erroneous decision"
Did the author of these passages even consider NPOV?
:It's not biased the author was arguing from the point of view of expected utility theory which is the normative theory that suggests these actions are biased
> I agree with the above. The article should merely explain the bias, not pass judgment on it. Many people can reasonably argue with what it currently presumes. Mushroom Pi 03:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: 209.197.190.240 13:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe?
Talk:São Bernardo do Campo

message: It's not located at São Bernado, instead is located at São Caetano do Sul.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.174.20.114 (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia " 
Talk:Elliot Easton

message: "Modern version" of Creedence?  I think that's a stretch.  The only true version of Creedence was from 1967 to '72.  Revisited is a tribute act. That demands a change. 68Kustom (talk) 23:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creedence mention 

message: Some sources indicate Elliot Easton's birth name was Steinberg while others say Shapiro. Does anyone know of any reason for the conflicting information? In a Boston Globe article "The Cars on road to success" dated January 12, 1978 (before the first album was recorded) he is identified as Elliot Shapiro. That doesn't necessarily mean that was his birth name but he was at least going by that name at that point. Piriczki (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a reference to a 1988 Creem article where Elliot himself supposedly said "Steinberg, not Shapiro".  -- HLachman (talk) 02:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name 
Talk:Ultimate Masters of Formula 3

message: Nowadays it's the BP Ultimate Masters of Formula 3. A better titel would be Masters or Masters of FOmrula 3 (to prevent a lot of redirects) 13.16.137.10 11:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

message: It was integrated as a championship round of the Euroseries from 2004 onwards.
: I think it's wrong. Each year, there is a F3 Euroseries meeting at Zandvoort, but this is not the "Masters of Formula 3". Woodcote 14:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: F3 Euro
Talk:Ipswich Museum

message: Can anyone provide information about the beetle tax, if there is or was such a tax. Snowman 11:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Beetle tax

message: About 30 or more years ago the museum was much more interesting and entertaining than currently due to being a Victorian museum that had been preserved in aspic unchanged until that time, with lots of stuffed animals etc. So it was a museum of a museum. Unfortunately the well-intended partial modernisation has lost the charm and curio value of the original. It was like someone deciding to modernise the Sir John Soane's Museum for educational purposes. Perhaps one day it will be put back how it was. 2.97.221.246 (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was once a perfectly preserved Victorian museum 
Talk:Michael Schenker

message: I was reading this article.
- According to the sleeve notes for the recently remastered UFO CD 'Phenomenon' Bernie Marsden did not lose his passport but used this as an excuse to not go on the tour as he was looking to leave the band. Also it was Bernie Marsden who saw Michael playing with the Scorpions on a previous German Tour and took the rest of UFO along to see the guitarist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.45.180.146 (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs some more elaboration 

message: The discography lists 5 when the text says three albums. -- Beardo 03:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  McAuley Schenker Group 

message: why does the album link for "Be Aware of Scorpions" redirect back to this page?DragonsDream (talk) 08:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: rediredt

message: According to the German Wikipedia he was born in Hildesheim. What`s correct???--Tobias1983 Mail Me 23:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Birth 

message: The link to Fly To The Rainbow (1974) does not work. Besides, Michael Schenker does not appear in the list of musicians for Fly To The Rainbow (1974). Please fix this incongruencies.
ICE77 (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He co-wrote a couple songs on the album though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.15.137 (talk) 16:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Need a RS to prove that claim.50.111.25.27 (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fly To The Rainbow (1974) 

message: I've moved the album Temple of Rock over to his solo discography because the album cover only says Michael Schenker and not Michael Schenker Group.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.140.226 (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple of Rock 

message: Speaking of this distinction, isn't the phrase "solo band", in the first paragraph, an oxymoron?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.191.203 (talk) 00:14, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Schenker vs. Michael Schenker Group 

message: Several interviews are around where Schenker said his No.1 reason for quitting UFO was "Phil Moog" and his drinking problems were a result of that strained relationship - these should be incorporated in the article. 50.111.25.27 (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflicts with Phil Moog
Talk:4th Massachusetts Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th Massachusetts Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052735/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Simla Agreement

message: Uhhh, if I'm not wrong, isn't it "Shimla" instead of "Simla"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulveriser (talk • contribs) 
:Shimla is the new name of the town. When the treaty was signed, the town was called Simla. Shimla is infact as recent as the 1980s, if I am not wrong -- Lost 15:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says that 34,000 of those held by India as prisoners of war were military, while Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 says that 79,676 were uniformed (and over 50,000 were Army personel).  Which number is right? Molinari 02:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Troops helds as prisoners of war?

message: The text of the agreement should be moved onto wikisource --PBS (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikisource 

message: There is another article (Simla agreement)about the same subject and having same title but different case. As Simla Agreement is a proper noun, this title follows the WP:TITLE guideline and therefore I propose merger of Simla agreement into this page. --SMS  Talk 15:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Most of the internal links listed under 'Indo-Pakistani War of 1971' are the war fraught between Mukti Bahini and West Pakistan army. Moreover these are happen before 3 December 1971, when India took part on war officially. I think it should changed to Bangladesh Liberation War.--Freemesm (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Indo-Pakistani War' or 'Bangladesh Liberation War'
Category talk:Limited-access roads

message: There is no single definition of limited-access road. Defining the category to be based on that is misleading, confusing and stupid. --SPUI (T - C) 20:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of my reversion

message: "High speed roadways" isn't appropriate as per the 11 July deletion discussion (some rural roads in Texas have higher speed limits than interstates). How about "High-throughput roadways"? It captures the essential feature of these structures and is not biased to particular countries like "Freeways and motorways". --Oldak Quill 21:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New naming suggestion
Talk:Beretta 8000 Models

message: All the pages for Beretta 8000 (Cougar) series variants have been removed (redirected), so this page no longer serves any purpose. The various specifications are on the single page for the series Beretta 8000, because they are all the same weapon only slightl variants like caliber etc.  Deon Steyn 12:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Beretta 8040 Mini Cougar F

message: This should absolutely not have been a separate page and nither should any of the other more than 10 variants. They are only different models (variants) of the Beretta 8000 and almost all the information is duplicated.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines:
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.  Deon Steyn 12:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Beretta 8045 Mini Cougar F

message: This should absolutely not have been a separate page and nither should any of the other more than 10 variants. They are only different models (variants) of the Beretta 8000 and almost all the information is duplicated.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines:
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.  Deon Steyn 12:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Beretta 8045 Mini cougar F

message: This should absolutely not have been a separate page and nither should any of the other more than 10 variants. They are only different models (variants) of the Beretta 8000 and almost all the information is duplicated.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines:
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.  Deon Steyn 12:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Beretta 8000 Mini Cougar F

message: This should absolutely not have been a separate page and nither should any of the other more than 10 variants. They are only different models (variants) of the Beretta 8000 and almost all the information is duplicated.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines:
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.  Deon Steyn 12:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Philadelphia Toboggan Coasters

message: When was this PTC carousel at Shoreline Village in Long Beach, California? It looks like the Santa Monica Pier to me. 173.67.106.134 (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoreline Village PTC carousel 

message: Please do not add Mighty Canadian Minebuster and Wildebeast. These coasters were not built by PTC despite plaques at the operator's booth and several published reports that claim they were. PTC stopped building coasters in 1979. This was determined by several well-known PTC researchers, and has been published in both RollerCoaster! magazine and First Drop.—JlACEer (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coasters at Canada's Wonderland
Talk:7th Massachusetts Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 7th Massachusetts Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052735/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Wellcome Trust

message: This so-called "controversy" is spurious. It given undue weight here, since the Trust funds thousands and thousands of research projects that get picked up by the press but only this one is mentioned. It seems to boil down to a mistake by someone in the Indian Government who, presumably, mistook the Trust for a pharmaceutical company. The section is now turning into a coatrack for examination of the links between pharma funding of research. That may be appropriate on pages about the pharaceutical company or the individuals involved. But hardly appropriate for a charitable trust that has been incorrectly identified. I propose the entire section is removed as non-notable fluff. And, to delcare my own COI: I - like many other researchers - receive research funding from the Wellcome Trust, but not by any pharmaceutical companies. Rockpocket 10:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superbug controversy 

message: In this edit I removed a large amount of material taken from the Wellcome Trust website. I've subsequently discovered that this material is actually licensed under a CC-BY license (see here). If we want to use this material, we still need to provide attribution to the Wellcome Trust, which has not been done so far. Any ideas on what the best way to do this is? NotFromUtrecht (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One solution is to add an OTRS ticket template to the top of this talk page saying that some of the text has been taking from their website and giving the recommended attribution. If you email, say, infowikimedia.org.uk pointing to the relevant source page and where it is used in the article, I can arrange it this way and the ticket remains as verifiable evidence on file even if the article changes radically later on. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material from Wellcome Trust website 
Talk:Peter Manley

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.petermanley.co.uk/about/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:8th Massachusetts Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 8th Massachusetts Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052735/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Skylon Tower

message: I may remove the "Skylon Revolving Dining Room" link. It just goes to one of many hundreds of restaurant portals that have an entry on the tower. I don't see why it needs to be linked here. --Avwhite 12:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Am9unts this facility has changed hands for need to be noted as being in either Canadian or US dollars.  Either would be reasonable, but giving the growing discrepancy in valuation in recent decades, valuable to know.  2600:1004:B104:AAB1:0:39:D428:1701 (talk) 15:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prices