lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jane Irwin Harrison

message: Where is she buried?  I think if we found this out it would be a great addition to the article. --Coingeek (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial 
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler

message: I've just finished reading this article. Nice work.  Since you are putting this up for GA, I'd like to offer some suggestions for you:
*Panic of 1837 - might add a word to note that it was financial, as there are other types of mass panics - food shortages, health pandemic, etc.
*"allowed her to open an account in every store in Williamsburg". How many stores could that be?  Even now, the entire population is only 15,425.
*"which Priscilla Tyler hoped would bring independence for her and her husband" - how so?
*"she expressed shock at her fortune in presiding - Mrs. Tyler was too ill"  Maybe "fortune" sounds a little heartless about Mrs. Tyler.
*"brought about 3,000 people to the White House while Tyler was seven months pregnant."  How about moving the pregnancy earlier in the sentence, "In March 1842, Tyler was seven months pregnant and responsible for .."
*"Letitia Tyler-Semple saw to White House social affairs until the wedding" First place this name shows up.  How about "President Tyler's daughter Letitia Tyler-Semple saw to White House social affairs ... "
That's about it.  — Maile  (talk) 02:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes for suggestions
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler

message: The article currently seems to create a misleading impression about the dates involved.  Julia Gardiner's father was killed on February 28, 1844, which was obviously well after Tyler proposed in 1843.  The article currently implies that she consented because he "comforted her in her grief," but the dates suggest they had already been secretly engaged for more than a year before her father's death.  This should be rewritten. john k (talk) 00:29, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading Impression
Talk:Margaret Taylor

message: Immediately to the right of where the article says "[a]lthough no portrait of her survives,..." sits what purports ot be a portrait of her. Is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvd Avins (talk • contribs) 01:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have previously removed the statement in question from the article because it was obviously inaccurate. --TommyBoy (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait 

message: Mentioned in the article of one of her children, her children were raised alternately at their plantation in Louisville and various forts.  This would seem to confirm her residency in Louisville.  Can anyone pin down the periods she (presumably along with her children) lived in Louisville? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residency in Louisville
Talk:Cloo

message: What does this mean? "It ... is the fourth latest addition to their line up of digital cable TV channels, after The Weather Channel, Oxygen and Chiller." NBCU has 26 cable channels, and some of these seem older than Cloo. Pdxuser (talk) 04:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Fourth latest addition' 

message: I propose that Trio (TV network) be merged into this article, it is the same exact channel and all the information can be merged into one article. JE98 (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Harriet Lane

message: "The widow Lane who had also outlived two of her sons lived in the capital"...awkward and meaning unclear. 2600:8805:5800:F500:9C9D:6AB3:CBF8:A317 (talk) 14:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this mean?

message: The article on Harriet_Lane says there were "eleven women who have served as First Lady but were not married to the President".
The article First_Lady_of_the_United_States#Non-spouses_in_the_role says "Several women (at least thirteen) who were not presidents' wives have served as first lady".
Don't know which is right; please fix the other.
47.139.46.80 (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy as to number of First Ladies who weren't married to Presidents
Talk:Lynn Hershman Leeson

message: Lynn Hershman Leeson is a well-known figure in the art world and has directed high profile art films, one of which has a Wikipedia entry and stars Tilda Swinton.  Her entry should not be deleted. --Scottandrewhutchins 14:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion is absurd

message: I removed this notice as I removed references to Hershman Leeson's CV or resume in the Awards and Honors section. I will also be working on the other sections of the page in the future, but thought this may have been the section that was referencing the most primary materials, e.g. the artist's CV. Vaparedes (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed BLP primary sources 

message: Lynn Hershman Leeson's work wasn't always accepted by the art world, specifically in her early career. This needs to be developed and added to this article for the sake of context. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing details
Talk:Lucretia Garfield

message: Don't think so, but I don't know how to edit it, and I don't know what it said before.  I would say European American is safe.  Probably of English descent via Puritans of New England.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.65.26 (talk) 02:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Lucretia Garfield Hispanic and Italian and etc.? 

message: They weren't recognized as a separate church until 1906 until then it was the churches of christ also James was not Disciples of Christ he belong to a church of christ   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twicks696 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disciples of Christ?

message: The section "Later life and death" contains the sentence "She went to events Theodore Roosevelt held in support of him."  What is the antecedent of "him"?  It's unclear, as there has a been no reference to a singular male for a few sentences.  Cyrus W. Field?  James Garfield?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riordanmr (talk • contribs) 03:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  She went to events Theodore Roosevelt held in support of him 

message: Born in Garrettsville, Ohio, Garfield first met her husband in 1849 at Geauga Seminary.[1] After a long courtship, they married in 1858. They would eventually have seven children together, five of whom lived to adulthood. Highly educated and intellectually curious, Lucretia Garfield was well attuned to the internal machinations of the Republican Party, which proved to be of great aid to her husband's political career. She was well regarded during her brief period in the White House, but after only a few months contracted malaria and went to Long Branch, New Jersey, to recuperate.
In July 1881, James Garfield was shot and mortally wounded by Charles Guiteau. He lingered for two and a half months before dying, during which his wife stayed at his bedside and received much public sympathy. Lucretia Garfield returned to her former residence in Ohio after being widowed, living in what is now the James A. Garfield National Historic Site. She spent much of the rest of her life preserving her husband's papers and other materials, establishing what was effectively the first presidential library. 72.252.32.10 (talk) 19:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  assassination
Talk:Mary Arthur McElroy

message: Was she born in Vermont or New York? From reading the page it says both, in different parts of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldScottishPerson (talk • contribs) 16:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out. It looks like I accidentally copied her mother's location of birth at one point when writing the article. I've fixed it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth? 

message: Is she buried in Albany, New York, her place of death? --Coingeek (talk) 19:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial? 

message: The article says that she "... later married insurance salesman John McElroy (in 1851)"  Really?  At the age of 10??  Bayowolf (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage.
Talk:Ida Saxton McKinley

message: The section "murder of George Saxton" the way it is written has little to do with Ida McKinley's life. (I will admit that I haven't gotten that far into McKinley's life, so perhaps there's more relevance than I think.) However, I don't know if I've found enough material to create an article for the Saxton family. Any advice from talk page stalkers would be most appreciated! ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant section?
Talk:Helen Herron Taft

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 02:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Under the section Early Years it states "In 1879, she met William Howard Taft at a bobsledding party in Cincinnati; he was 22 years old, she was 18. He asked her out for the first time in February 1880, but they did not date regularly until 1882."  However, on the Wikipedia article for William, under the subsection Ohio Lawyer and Judge, this article states "It is not clear when Taft met Helen Herron (often called Nellie), but it was no later than 1880, when she mentioned in her diary receiving an invitation to a party from him."  No source is provided for either sentence.  So, anyone know which is accurate?  The two articles should align.  CPAScott (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Courtship to William H. Taft
Talk:Ellen Axson Wilson

message: Okay, I might not be fully awake or something, but...
"Thomas Woodrow Wilson first saw her when he was about six and she only a baby."
Okay, so the age difference is about six years.  But then...
"Wilson, aged 28, married Ellen, aged 25, on June 24, 1885..."
What?  Could someone explain and fix if necessary?  Or am I the one who needs fixing? 75.18.228.225 (talk) 23:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age discrepancy? 

message: She was the third First Lady, and most recent, to die in office.
:May sound like nit-picking. But First Lady isn't actually an office. We might re-word as 'to die during her tenancy'. Valetude (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Grace Coolidge

message: The text of this article was copied directly the White House web site. This may be a copyright violation. If it is not, it is certainly written in a tone which is not neutral in tone, does not adhere to the guidelines of for neutral point of view in biographies. --Crunch (talk) 23:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied Directly from White House Web Site 

message: 'In 1921, as wife of the Vice President, Grace Coolidge went from her housewife's routine into Washington society and quickly became the most popular woman in the capital.' Needs some qualification, to put it mildly.
 
'...she planned the new administration's social life as her husband wanted it: pretentious and undignified.' Most unlikely, in the case of the quiet and reserved Calvin Coolidge. Are you sure you don't mean 'dignified and unpretentious'? 86.148.132.69 (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Re the first one, the preceding sentence reads: Grace did not maintain much of a public profile. This conflicts directly with the next statement about her image as Second Lady. Valetude (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing needed 
Talk:STS-45

message: Some of this article has been copied from the NASA website. Is this is the public domain? 0L1 14:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: YES see above template.LanceBarber (talk) 02:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicholas Van Dyke (politician, born 1738)

message: @User:Randy Kryn: Nicholas Van Dyke is considered a Founding Father by whom? Since you didn't add a citation, we have no way of telling. So please apply one so we can determine whether reliable sources consider him a founder. This page is one 50 or so where you added this title without providing a citation. According to WP:VER, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." Thank you. Allreet (talk) 01:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputing unsourced Founding Father title
Talk:Sara Roosevelt

message: Needs fleshing-out with some account of her marriage, and a lot more detail about her strained relationship with Eleanor. Valetude (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It does need work, though feel free to add information yourself. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a bit, but perhaps we need a fellow aristocratic socialite to chip in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far too brief 

message: Is that story based on a movie from the 90's? Really? No other source? 2A01:799:1361:4100:FCC9:D7EB:5981:3CFE (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 12
Talk:Doepfer

message: if it was founded in 1992, why are their products as old as 1979? --HL-SDK 14:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The company was founded in 1992, but Dieter Doepfer has made electronical music gear since the 1970ies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.133.219.59 (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Doepfer
Talk:Hamburg Finkenwerder Airport

message: Even as a German speaker, I'm having a hard time understanding what the paragraph headed Design is supposed to mean. If anyone has a clue, please help re-word it. -chdte- (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section because it was indeed hard to understand and also solely based on a primary source (the mentioned company's website & press release). BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Design'' heading
Talk:Benedict Wong

message: I saw Benedict as Laertes to Michael Sheen's Hamlet this year.
Is there any where to find references to his theatre work?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.25.248 (talk) 22:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theatre 

message: Anyone else find it amusing that Benedict Wong plays the mononymous Wong?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.209.144.202 (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 2A00:23C4:601B:DF01:15AE:E9F7:B89B:C74 (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wong is Wong 
Talk:Fantunes

message: I made a few tweaks the the FANTUNES page. In part just to try out how to edit stuff. I hope to contribute to the contract bridge wiki in the future. --Bboinquiry 21:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tweaks

message: I would like to see a bit more here about how they handle the second round of bidding when responder could have no values and opener is unlimited. From what I have seen, they do not have a formally negative response. Bids that in standard systems could be as weak as five or six points, in Fantunes could be as few as zero. Can opener make a game-forcing bid, forcing on responder even if responder has nothing, essentially showing a hand that others would open with 2C? If so, must opener refrain from making very strong bids with hands that could force to game opposite a normal response? 65.79.173.135 (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Second round bidding
Talk:Middleton, Milton Keynes

message: This article could use some pictures of the village (and the road signs!). --Concrete Cowboy 15:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures needed

message: This seems uncontroversial to me, but others may disagree.  I would like to rename this articles to become Middleton (Milton Keynes Village). The present title of the article doesn't reflect properly that Middleton (a) contains the village at its heart (b) the Parish is still Milton Keynes (c) the area has been called Milton Keynes for centuries [before which it was Middleton Cahaignes and (maybe) before that was just Middleton]. Any comments before I do it? --John Maynard Friedman 17:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As there are no objections, I'll go ahead.  --John Maynard Friedman 17:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a subsequent objection, though without bothering to discuss it here. After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Place name disambiguation, England, the relevant interpretation of WP:UKPLACE for this article is that the town/city is the more appropriate disambiguation.  The article should be at Middleton, Milton Keynes. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to change name of article to Middleton (Milton Keynes Village) 

message: I suggest that we split the article into (a) Middleton [the district] and (b) Milton Keynes (civil parish) (currently a redirect) at the same time as Broughton and MK joint CP divides.  I don't believe that this is currently on the cards but I suspect it won't be more than a couple of years or so. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the article 
Talk:405 (film)

message: Most of the things I added were from a presentation at a Independent Filmmakers Coalition of Kansas City meeting. I'm not sure how to cite that. --Gbleem 15:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anybody know if these guys were influenced by the Buckaroo Banzai: Ancient Secrets and New Mysteries short that Foundation Imaging did for a possible TV series? The sequence with the space shuttle landing on the jet car is almost shot-for-shot identical to the plane landing in 405.
MFNickster (talk) 03:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Buckaroo Banzai TV series

message: Shouldn't the two traffic tickets be listed under "Citations" as well? 😸 Ch'marr (talk) 02:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:The London Paper

message: I would argue this newspaper is notable - it is the first newspaper to directly compete with the Evening Standard and Associated Press's monopoly on the London evening newspaper industry since 1980. Hence this brings competition to the evening paper market in London for the first time in two decades. I shall edit the article to make this point. EAi 15:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable

message: Adding to this section, as the BBC reports that the paper is to have its last print-run today.
* BBC News
Beck13 (talk) 09:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support.  The BBC, our only reliable source for the article, use the version of the name with conventional spelling and capitalization. Tevildo (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Letters to Malcolm

message: I took out the statement that these letters were addressed to Malcolm Muggeridge. I've never seen that claim. The back cover of the Harvest Books edition says the book is "in the form of warm, relaxed letters to a close friend". Nothing about Malcolm Muggeridge. And on page 3 of this article, Eric Seddon wrote that Lewis "[invented] his own, less intelligent sparring partner, named Malcolm, as his foil." The article on Malcolm Muggeridge says that Muggeridge married Katherine Dobbs, also called Kathleen or Kitty. The book refers to "Malcolm"'s wife as "Betty". Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 14:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malcolm Muggeridge
Template talk:Governor's Schools (Virginia)

message: Isn't "Appomattox" a geographic description?  I think it's worthwhile to keep the template as short as possible: this is why I initially only put in parenthetical geographic descriptions for the schools whose names didn't suggest a region.  I don't think "Petersburg" needs to be included as a parenthetical for that school. Jkatzen 15:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On closer evaluation, I realize that Appomattox County/Courthouse is something like 60 miles west of Petersburg, so I'm adding the geographic descriptor back in.  Why on earth was the school named Appomattox? Jkatzen 15:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appomatox / Petersburg
Talk:Constantijn Huygens

message: We have him in the category Recipients of Honorary British Knighthoods, yet we call him "Sir Constantijn".  These don't go together.  Honorary knights may use whatever postnominal letters might be appropriate, but do not get the style "Sir".  We need to find out the exact status of his honour.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 01:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 21:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Knighthood
Talk:Stari Grad, Novi Sad

message: Spens is not part of old town, that picture should be removed, also I think Old town is a better translation of "stari grad" then old city --87.116.141.69 15:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you live in Novi Sad, you should go to some bookshop or library and see this book: Jovan Mirosavljević, Brevijar ulica Novog Sada 1745-2001, Novi Sad, 2002. On the last pages of this book you have detailed maps of city quarters that show Spens as part of Stari Grad (southern border of Stari Grad is Bulevar cara Lazara). And whether correct English translation is "old city" or "old town", maybe you should see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_City (about old city in Jerusalem). However, if you think that name "old town" is better, you can change this by yourself. PANONIAN (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Herbert William Garratt

message: We come upon the question of Garratt in Australia again. My understanding was that Garratt was a consultant for the NSWG Railways in the UK, inspecting locomotives being built by British builders prior to shipment, and in fact he was never in Australia. My source for that was, I think, "The Origins of the Garratt Locomotive". But when I went to check it last night, do you think I could find the book? Never mind, it will turn up soon.
However the references quoted with this rewrite are certainly impressive. And to top it off last night I found another book which stated Garratt spent time in Australia. The problem of course is that they could all be relying on one incorrect source, as indeed my original source could be. I think this is a question of some importance, and needs to be resolved.
The reference to the rail-mounted artillery is also of interest, and makes sense in that if he was already consulting to one arm of the NSW government, another would also use him on matters relating to railways. The only question here is that the NSW army, or indeed the suceeding Australian army, never had rail mounted artillery. I had previously read it as he observed some conventional gun carrages, but will have to go back to my source and re-read it in light of this infomation. --Michael Johnson 23:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garratt & Australia
Talk:Electronic data interchange personal identifier

message: I'm strongly considering merging this with CAC as there's just not enough to say about it by itself, and most people have never heard of the EDIPI in either the long form or the acronym.  They just know about it as "the CAC number" and if they're searching for more information, they'll be reading through CAC, not here.  Mugaliens 15:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)