Talk:ORB survey of Iraq War casualties

message: Thanks for starting this wikipedia article, SDas.
There is more wikified ORB survey info (with references) here:
*Template:Summary of casualties of the Iraq War
*Casualties of the Iraq War
*Iraq War#Casualties --Timeshifter 07:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some other sources of wiki material 

message: I was bold and changed the name of this article from ORB survey of casualties after the invasion of Iraq to ORB survey of casualties of the Iraq War. I hope this is OK. It maintains consistency of naming concerning the Iraq War. It also allows me to start wikilinking to this article right away. --Timeshifter 07:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great job! The article looks so good now. SDas 11:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: There are 1613 days between March 20, 2003, and August 19, 2007.  That makes the supposed average deaths per day in Iraq to be nearly 620, per week to be almost 4,340 and per month (4 weeks) to be almost 17,359.  Apparently all these deaths are taking place in areas well away from the sight of the numerous international reporters in the country... 67.135.49.211 (talk) 05:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't that obvious that reporters would only report a small fraction of all excess deaths? How many Darfur deaths or Rwanda deaths got reported? Not only is (or was) Iraq a developing nation, with this many deaths, it does not make a nice report to cover each one. SDas (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe Darfur or Rwanda have embedded reporters. Not many, anyway. 67.135.49.211 (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is why IBC exists. But embedded reporters are attached to the invading forces in Iraq, ergo severe restrictions in what they can access, and what they can report. And they came under criticism for being too biased. Anyway this issue is not related to the main article. SDas (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems this poll is a fraud: http://w4.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/viewArticle/2373  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.192.8 (talk) 11:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths per day 

message: http://dailysketcher.blogspot.com/2006/11/professors-michael-spagat-neil.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.218.48 (talk) 03:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest in criticism of the Lancet report. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on ORB survey of Iraq War casualties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090219212651/http://www.opinion.co.uk:80/Documents/Revised%20Casulaty%20Data%20-%20Press%20release.doc to http://www.opinion.co.uk/Documents/Revised%20Casulaty%20Data%20-%20Press%20release.doc
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110719105821/http://w4.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/viewArticle/2373 to http://w4.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/viewArticle/2373
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121130212139/http://medialens.org/alerts/07/070918_the_media_ignore.php to http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/070918_the_media_ignore.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified