lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carl Jung

message: This is related to an edit I asked for in the article about Sabina Spielrein. 
These articles discuss the events between Jung and Spielrein as if it were ethical, normal and consensual. 
She describes having been very mistreated by Jung, who had intimate relations with this teenage mental patient while he was married. I have heard that she even assaulted him with a letter knife and he had to resign from his clinic in shame. 
He responds to Freud to discredit her, and none of this is mentioned in this article. The article, and many others that describe their knowledge of one another, are subjective and openly sympathetic to Jung. This is NOT a fan site. This is an objective information repository. 
A section should be added discussing these very serious allegations. 2600:6C40:6100:C500:FCD8:6F26:C2F3:3F6F (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rape/S.A.? 

message: He influenced Christopher Booker 193.1.86.99 (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Add to Infobox if you can support it. Errantius (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences 

message: The Christopher Booker citation has been added to the main text. It should be in the references. 93.107.174.31 (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit was not the correct way to cite a source. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources and examine some existing Wikipedia articles to see how other editors have cited sources.—Anita5192 (talk) 01:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Christopher Booker]] 

message: Given that there is reference to his grandfather Karl and this guy is Carl, it is strange that in the righthand bio his name is
birth_name        = Karl Gustav Jung
So is he Carl or Karl?  (I suspect Carl based on a quick Google search, but that's not authoritative enough for me to just change it. 47.186.47.121 (talk) 12:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Name 

message: There have been numerous biographies of Jung, quite apart from his autobiography Memories, Dreams, Reflections. It would be good if the "Further Reading" section had 
a sub-section which listed some of these biographies. YTKJ (talk) 21:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Biographies

message: Paglia has mentioned Jung many times in her work and declared herself a subscriber to his theory of synchronicity in her work Sexual Personae (1990). Wouldn't it be worth mentioning her in the Jung template as a follower or inspiration? Ashton 29 (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Camille Paglia]] as a follower? 

message: C G Jung is credited with developing the psychological theory that what one does to others, is also what one does (unknowingly) to oneself. This may be extended and understood in all areas of human behaviour.JohnEC Jr (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behaviour, Ethics and Reciprocity 

message: Is more than something to be said about his sons and daughters and their lives, mission and legacy?JohnEC Jr (talk) 21:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:Pulsed inductive thruster

message: "Unlike other electromagnetic drives, PIT requires no electrodes (which are susceptible to erosion)..."
At least some ion drives use electrodes which are not "susceptible" to erosion in that that eroding them is just precisely how the reaction mass is supplied, with new mass feeding in. Technically, yes, they are eroding - but the equipment isn't wearing away. Example: a drop of liquid metal at the end of a hollow feeder needle is drawn out into a point by an electrostatic field, then ions emerge from that point. PML.
The current propellant of choice for PIT operation is actually ammonia (NH3). This is due to its high efficiency. However, many gases can and have been used in PIT operation (like Ar) although at lower efficiency than ammonia. -D. Allison
Argon is 1.6% of Mars' atmosphere.  Spacecraft whose pulsed inductive thrusters can use Argon could be refuel for say the return journey whilst orbiting Mars.
[]
Andrew Swallow 00:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:King of Romania

message: King of the Romanians?
:I think the Kings themselves used both versions of their title: "of Romania" and "of the Romanians". Lil' mouse 2 (talk) 07:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't this be called

message: If the article reads, from the begining:
King of the Romanians (Romanian: Regele Românilor)rather than King of Romania (Romanian: Regele României) was the official title of the ruler of the Kingdom of Romania from 1881 until 1947 when Romania was proclaimed a republic.
why is the article still named "King of Romania"? 
Please note that I do realize the... conflict: on all the coins, all the Kings where titled "of the Romanians", but as a royal house they are titled "of Romania".
--ES Vic (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: There are 2 Wikipedia articles about the Kingdom of Romania:
* Kingdom of Romania
* King of the Romanians (same subject)
It makes sense to merge the pages.
See also:
* Romanian royal family
* Hohenzollern#Kings of the Romanians
A  history merging will be necessary. --Mr. Boston (talk) 00:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Requests_for_history_merge#Rejected_requests_September_2017--Mr. Boston (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Wikipedia pages on the same subject (Rejected request)

message: Article name should be moved to Monarchy of Romania. GoodDay (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Anonimu (talk) 20:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that's the standard name for most of the other monarchy pages - Monarchy of country. GoodDay (talk) 02:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page. (non-admin closure)  — YoungForever(talk)  14:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: King of the Romanians →  – Clearly the common name: . Half a million ghits for "King of Romania", 64 for "King of the Romanians" DrKay (talk) 07:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 July 2020
Talk:Inductor

message: I had hopped to save some bandwidth but if I must:
First, it is wrong. Stanley didn’t invent the first practical induction coil as stated. Inductions coils had been around for fifty years before that and Ruhmkorff was building excellent ones in 1850. What Stanley’s patent did cover was a version of an AC transformer that proved to be practical and similar to modern transformers. Since patents require titles and there was not yet a word for the device, he used whatever words were handy. The patent was titled “Induction Coil”.  Mr. Stanley’s contribution is covered in transformer where it belongs. It has nothing to do with the Inductor article. This history section was left over here as a remnant of some confusion in terminology from a year ago. Let us recreate a history section only when we have something applicable to put into it. Meggar 05:58, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
:Thank you for that explanation.
:Atlant 11:47, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of old history section 

message: I need 2mh 20ampere copper wire 16number double wire winding 121.91.39.48 (talk) 16:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inducter
Talk:List of monarchs who lost their thrones in the 20th century

message: Why is Faisal II on here?  He reigned as king until his death.  He ought to be removed, I think. john k 06:40, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faisal II? 

message: I removed all of the pictures from the article. I did this mainly because the pictures made the page look very disorganized. Plus, the pictures all also appear on the separate pages for each monarch that the pictures belonged to, so it was pointless. The page looks much nicer without them. --Woohookitty 01:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the pictures 

message: Can we find a shorter name for "Kehalarat Deelat Nyang Meuha Meulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Berdaulat Zilulahil Filalam Alaudin Muhammad Daud Shah"? Colipon+(T) 05:05, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  That long name 

message: If one "abdicates",one loses his throne,as if he were deposed.
New Babylon 13:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason of move 

message: Should look at adding in also "and 21st" to include the very few so far in this century. No point at this time to make a separate article yet, so having a called "List of monarchs who lost their thrones in the 20th and 21st century" would be the best option now. If no reasonable objections are said before this month's end, then it should be done & those few added within afterwards. That-Vela-Fella (talk) 22:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit article title

message: Shouldn't he be included because he abdicated in the 21st century?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killuminator (talk • contribs) 11:39, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope Benedict XVI
Talk:Percentage solution

message: This page seems redundent. Percentage solution is a measurement of concentration and is properly explained on the Concentration page. I suggest we redirect Percentage Solution to the Concentration page.
Grayob (talk) 16:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. If you delve deep into it, percentage concentration is more complex than it appears on the surface. There have been discussions, or usages, in the literature that include all combinations: weight/volume, weight/weight, volume/volume, volume/weight, weight/volume. The basic idea is from the factor that water's density is 1 gram per milliliter. Therefore the it appears, at least to some, the weight denominator is possible. Percentage solution deserves a separate entry. Otherwise it will mess up the co-merged entry.--Achian (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A page with the meanings of the percentages should be created , as proposed elsewhere. The section on solution preparation could be inserted in solution article and is not really necessary here.--86.125.191.129 (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This information also on Concentration page

message: Anyone reading this page should also consult the page "Percent sign".
In the International System of units (S.I.)  % is a well defined symbol that can be replaced by "x 0.01" (multiply by 0.01) or equivalently "÷ 100" (divide by 100). In S.I. any quantity  expressed as   x %  where x is a number must itself be a number. Ratios of volumes or ratios of masses are just numbers and thus these can be expressed using the % symbol.  It is common at least in the biological literature to refer to the concentration of a solution containing 1 g of solute per 100 mL of solution as 1 %w/v. In light of the above it would be much better to state the concentration in terms of units for mass and volume, e.g. 10 g/L or 10 mg/mL. A careful statement of these matters can be found in section 7.10.2 of the publication "The NIST Guide for the use of the International System of Units" by A Thompson and B.N.Taylor, which can be consulted or downloaded at http://www.nist.gov/pml/pubs/sp811/index.cfm.
SteveElemMaths (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. But, this article discusses a common usage and terminology and we're not here to correct the biologist's terminology - just to report and try to explain what they mean. Vsmith (talk) 16:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using % to express concentrations.
Talk:Alphaeus Philemon Cole

message: A picture of Mr Cole can be found on www.grg.org/calment.html-Longevitymonger
An image search got me the following.. Also a link to the above site is here--T. Anthony 04:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tikrit

message: Calling Saddam Hussein either the legitimate or former President of Iraq suggests a non-NPOV.  It is not the universal opinion of Iraqis that he is no longer the legal President (IIRC, a survey last month said 45% of Iraqis recognize him) Aminaa
:Yoy must recognise the difference between what is and what you may believe should be. Saddam is currently not the president of Iraq. He is on trial and in the custody of a different government than his own. TewfikTalk 01:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, one can make a distinction between de facto and de jure.  But in any case it doesn't matter now -- he can't be the president because he's dead. --Saforrest 12:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling Saddam 'former President' is a POV 

message: I know Saladin and, of course, Saddam Hussein were born here, but I think I need more to start a notable people column. Any others? Imperius iv 19:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable citizens? 

message: It's not really fair to say Saddam "banished the use of surnames": there is no easy parallel between Arabic names and the Western system.  As I understand, the idea of his name reforms were to drop the nisba (i.e. the al-Tikriti part) and turn the second name, originally a patronymic, into a Western-style surname.
This is why his sons were "Uday Hussein" and "Qusay Hussein" as opposed to "Uday Saddam" and "Qusay Saddam": Hussein had now become his and their surname, even though it was initially his father's given name.
That eliminating that nisba had the effect of concealing all the al-Tikritis is indisputable, and I'm sure that's part of why he did it.  I'd like to see some more references before we claim outright that this is why he did it, though. --Saforrest 12:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abolishing use of surnames 

message: I have been looking at mainstream media websites, such as TIME, BBC, and CNN and so on, and cannot find confirmation that Iraqi security forces have retaken Tikrit. I am not disputing that one source says it happened, and other sources says it 85% happened, but equally there are sources saying the opposite such as a number of towns have been retaken from the rebels, but they still control the key cities of Tikrit and Mosul. Anyway, I'll rephrase the sentence to say there was an attempt to regain the city which resulted in heavy fighting. PhilKnight (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current control of Tikrit 

message: This edit established the usage of the page as American English. Kindly maintain it consistently pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 06:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:ENGVAR]]
Talk:Tycho Brahe

message: It seems like the pronunciation of the leading syllable of Tycho should be changed from "tie" to "tea". This is a more accurate pronunciation which matches the spoken pronunciation from footnote "a" which has a recording of the pronunciation. Another possible pronunciation of this syllable could be the "ti" from "tick". Technochocolate (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update pronuncation guide 

message: There is much discussion about Tycho Brahe's nose, but why did he have half his head shaved, as in the picture to this article? That looks almost like something out of punk rock, or Mad Max movies.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portr%C3%A4tt_av_Tycho_Brahe_-_Skoklosters_slott_-_90153.tif 46.195.197.157 (talk) 23:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did he have half his head shaved? 

message: — Assignment last updated by LEIGH1203 (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton
Talk:John Dee

message: :Dee often traveled throughout Europe as an agent of William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley, Elizabeth's principal secretary. Dee's reports were signed "007", and is the origin James Bond's designation.
I'm moving this to talk, because there's no evidence for it. The idea of Dee as a spy came from a book written  by Richard Deacon in the late '60s, but his argument is highly speculative and not really taken seriously. Dee did have contact with Cecil and (more to the point) Walsingham at different times of his life, but to say he was Cecil's agent would be extremely misleading. I've never seen any evidence for the 007 part: Dee sometimes signed with a delta. Of course, if this can be backed up, it should go back in the article. PRiis 07:12, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a heavily referenced piece on the issue explaining how it came about with examples. (Emperor 04:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

text: You are correct, it does not belong in the biographical section and I've removed it. Yworo (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that could go in the "popular culture" section but not in the biography section. I'm going to later today take a stab at putting it there.--WickerGuy (talk) 16:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: As a general observation, "Popular culture" sections invariably attract WP:TRIVIA and WP:UNDUE contributions. A good rule of thumb: if is too insignificant or irrelevant to go anywhere but a Popular Culture section then it is too insignificant or irrelevant to go anywhere. Full stop. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that he spied is already in the article. The claim that he signed 007 is not well enough supported to put anywhere, even the popular culture section. It's also extremely unlikely: Dee is much more likely to have signed with a Greek delta, and also would have known that that letter's value is 004, not 007. Skyerise (talk) 18:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: a few days ago I put scholarly rebuttals to the claim that he signed his letters 007 in the "popular culture" section. WickerGuy (talk) 20:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've trimmed it. The original is too much per WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASP. DeCausa (talk) 22:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I should note that I pulled both the references I cited from a book that I felt did not fit Wikipedia's definition of a [WP:RELIABLE] source, a book on the astrology of James Bond. However, the two sources cited by the author, actually do  fit Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. WickerGuy (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  007 

message: If you have, would you check this citation please?
  
Which "two dates" does he mean? (Four hundred years ago today could have been written as 7 January 1620/21 or 7 January 1621 (26 December 1620). Thank you if you can help. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has anybody got Wolley's ''The Queen's Conjurer: The science and magic of Dr. John Dee, adviser to Queen Elizabeth I''?
Talk:Seymour Lubetzky

message: His death date has been listed as both April 5th and (according to the nonagenarians & centenarians site at www.tech.org/~cleary/NNC/nncmain.html) April 12th as well. This was probably due to the fact that the New York Times stated that Lubetzky died "last Saturday." Coming across this today (Sunday April 13) I assumed that meant the 12th. I therefore presume that the article and the author of this Wikipedia entry to be correct and I subsequently wish that the New York Times' website would actually state the date of death rather than saying just the day of the week so that a number and specific time can be attached to them. -- Katagelophobia
I think the following paragraph is wrong. Should anyone correct it?
"Lubetzky's theory of cataloging went far beyond the Dewey Decimal System. He divised a colorful yet tactful way of identifying but ordering books where even the most simple person could find it."
cat wizard --220.234.84.172 14:31, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says, "Lubetzky's theory of cataloging went far beyond the Dewey Decimal System". That confuses things (in this case, books etc.) so they can be identified and distinguished. Classification deals with arranging materials in some coherent order. Dewey Decimal System is an example of classification, not cataloging. 
E.g., classification in libraries deals with subjects, cataloging deals with authors' names (as author that is, not as subject of e.g., a biography).
Cy Silver
UCLA School of Library Service 1964, and proud to have been a student of Seymour Lubetzy
:I agree, and I removed that sentence. LaMona (talk) 04:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  inapproprirate content 

message: The article says, "Lubetzky's theory of cataloging went far beyond the Dewey Decimal System". That confuses things (in this case, books etc.) so they can be identified and distinguished. Classification deals with arranging materials in some coherent order. Dewey Decimal System is an example of classification, not cataloging. 
E.g., classification in libraries deals with subjects, cataloging deals with authors' names (as author that is, not as subject of e.g., a biography).
Cy Silver
UCLA School of Library Service 1964, and proud to have been a student of Seymour Lubetzy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.86.229 (talk) 23:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  inapproprirate content
Talk:King James Version

message: I was born in 2001 and was raised an atheist. I don't know how many people reading this come from non-Western countries, but certainly in the West there are teens and young adults who don't know what this document says. The KJV is the most important work in the English language and it NEEDS a synopsis! 2603:7000:D03A:5895:F507:553F:D386:B485 (talk) 23:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the core argument against a KJV specific synopsis is that any synopsis of the Bible is inherently a synopsis of, well, the BIBLE. The only things truly necessary to spell out separate from the synopsis that appears on the page for the Bible as a work in and of itself would be the places where the KJV differs from prior translations, or errors made in the translation that further scholarship can verify. The KJV on its own doesn't warrant a separate synopsis, it's just not all that terribly distinct or unique from other Bibles. 63.149.209.2 (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs a synopsis section 

message: Who was king James? 154.117.139.26 (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading the first 3 lines of the article is too hard? Johnbod (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  King James  

message: Here's the link: https://webchannel.purebiblesearch.com/
It has audio bibles, and the pure text of the KJV.
I'd also like to recommend https://thekjvstore.com/ as a place for buying KJV bibles, if the person of their own freewill so desires. The links are fine and everything is ok. It's just a suggestion. 190.141.81.136 (talk) 04:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to get Community Consensus to add a link to an online copy of the King James Version