Talk:Bioremediation

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bioremediation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304130419/http://www.scitechnol.com/bioremediation-of-tannery-wastewater-using-immobilized-marine-microalga-tetraselmis-sp-experimental-studies-and-pseudosecond-order-kinetics-Sp6P.php?article_id=3505 to http://www.scitechnol.com/bioremediation-of-tannery-wastewater-using-immobilized-marine-microalga-tetraselmis-sp-experimental-studies-and-pseudosecond-order-kinetics-Sp6P.php?article_id=3505
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Few months ago Mycoremediation became a section of Bioremediation, since the content was little and lacked of references. I rewrote the article and added all the needed references so I place it back in its own page and deleted the section here.
I added link to mycoremediation in See also and at the beginning, together with phytoremediation and the others. Basically, I'm using the same pattern as with phytoremediation.
Hope that is ok with everyone. --Beleriandcrises (talk) 11:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was thinking of adding more details about mutualistic Mycorrhizal remediation to the Mycoremediation article under "Synergy with Phytoremediation" but I may have enough information to dedicate to a whole article on the topic. I have a rough outline in my Sandbox. Whatsit369 (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I went ahead and created a Mycorrhizal Bioremediation page, and will work on incorporating its links and info into other pages. Whatsit369 (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Mycoremediation section 

message: Hi, I am thinking of including a section on the disadvantages of bioremediation. The 3 sources that I will be using are:
Bioremediation. An overview* by M. Vidali
https://www.iupac.org/publications/pac/pdf/2001/pdf/7307x1163.pdf
A comprehensive overview of elements in bioremediation by Juwarkar, Asha A; Singh, Sanjeev K; Mudhoo, Ackmez
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-010-9215-6
Factors limiting bioremediation technologies by R. Boopathy
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852499001443?via%3Dihub
Lizhuang97 (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The first ref is 16 years old and the third is 17 years old; there is generally no good reason to use refs that are this old.  The 2nd ref is fine date-wise and in terms of the kind of source it is. Jytdog (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of a disadvantages section 

message: User:Vaselineeeeeeee, not sure what is going on.  this and the restoration here were unsourced.  The source added here talks about a place in Idaho and the various kinds of pollutants, but doesn't mention bioremediation nor the whey etc they are pumping in.  The file at the commons gives a bit of quotation from the image source, so i found that (it is here) - they say they are using bioremediation to remove TCE, not radioactive stuff. Jytdog (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at Bioremediation of radioactive waste. If the searching you've done shows it's not radioactive waste, then maybe something needs to be done on that page as well. The image is clearly showing a radioactive waste symbol on the apparatus. If you're about the sourcing and not about controlling this page as I've seen you've recently pushed other editors away, then consistency among articles is important. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption 

message: The information presented on this page is often vague and does not take the appropriate time to explain the complicated topics covered so that the general public would be able to understand what exactly is being expressed. Any word or phrase used on this page that is not common knowledge should be explained in a sentence or two following or preceding their use in writing.Dbanyaib (talk) 22:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Vague

message: There current sections on heavy metals (chromium, cadmium, lead,) have lots of background information on these metals that is not directly linked to bioremediation.  I proposed to combine these sections into a single section on metals. The section will discuss several different metals remediation approaches including biosorption (focus of current articles), redox changes to immobilize, and sulfide precipitation.   Rcborden2 (talk) 13:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metals Section 

message: While many of us wish and hope that bioremediation was widely employed and highly effective, I worry that it is neither.  So I really toned down this article so that innocent readers are not led to believe that these techniques are being used on a large scale.   These green topics attract a lot of hopeful editors who want promise to be reality, but readers are here to collect sober knowledge on the current situation. Stated more bluntly, bioremediation is largely inadvertent, and human induced processes such as biostimulation are rare.  I could find no large scale apps, e.g. oil spills, chemical disasters, etc that were solved by bioremediation.  Hopefully, I am wrong.--Smokefoot (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Slightly misleading

message: — Assignment last updated by Pacificflower22 (talk) 18:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Landscape Restoration

message: — Assignment last updated by BlakeDecker003 (talk) 23:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment