lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tim Draper

message: This article needs to be rewritten in a content neutral fashion. As it was written, it read as if it was written by a marketing firm, and includes NUMEROUS unnecessary multiple links. Wikipedia should be a about fact, not as a tool to promote the subjects career. Sjkoblentz (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You were dead right; it was copied from the company's website in 2006 (see below). That stuff has been removed. Now it just needs someone to write some encyclopaedic content about this not uninteresting person. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a complete rewrite 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20060325052047/http://www.dfj.com/team/tim_bio.shtml. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Paul Lynde Show

message: "Chemistry between the main characters was somewhat lacking and many episodes had the misfortune of ending with the predictable crescendo of someone falling into Paul's pool, an event somehow funnier the first five times they used it."
This comment should probably be reworked or deleted to eliminate the point of view that's obviously in it. 4.243.206.159 21:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Point of view?
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages/archive1

message: I've merged the articles. I apologize, Dwaipayan, your comment had not been written when I started working on the merge and I just noticed it. I do think that the article is better merged. One could argue that each Pokemon game is self-contained, but we have several articles that each cover a pair, and rightfully so. Pagrashtak 06:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From the 2007 FAC nomination page
Talk:Tom Bawcock

message: A cynic might suggest that the legend only dates from the 1950's. But Morton Nance's 1927 article is not the only earlier reference to Tom Bawcock. There are earlier works, and of course the memory of old folk of the town.Royalcourtier (talk) 20:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Legend?
Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2008

message: The map showing participating countries that is in all other years' pages is missing. Can it be re-instated? Vauxhall1964 (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure? The maps appear to be present in the Eurovision Song Contest#Format section. All existing maps can be found in commons:Category:Eurovision 2008 on Wikimedia Commons. CT Cooper · talk 15:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing map 

message: i could fix it myself but i dont want any more threats.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 (talk) 
: I don't think any one will make "threats" over simple grammar issues. CT Cooper · talk 18:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  there is some grammar problems 

message: As I do not cope with Wikipedia's new editor, I cannot switch Poland to Portugal (See commentators' section, Poland is twice)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.130.58.181 (talk) 22:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland ≠ Portugal 

message: when i click on the button that sort it according på place it shows 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2 20 21 22 23 24 25 instead of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.84.208.77.64 (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added  to the table, so should now order correctly. --  axg // ✉  16:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the scoreboard of the final is glitched
Talk:Emil Jørgensen

message: Emil Ludvig Peter Jørgensen (born February 17, 1882)
+ Below
External links
Danish national team profile 
Fødselsdag: 7. februar 1882 
Poulsen  -  What date of birth the most exact 17.02 or 07.02
Gavrilov Sergey 21:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tom Clark (journalist)

message: Tom was simply the best news anchor. Very well spoken, not opinionated like others today and just delivered the news professionally and respectfully. I know many that attest to feeling the same way. CTV made a big mistake way back and there’s been no other like him. Hands down the very best. 2607:FEA8:3B20:9300:296E:C276:E48D:C9D0 (talk) 06:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Clark
Talk:Tom Doherty

message: Tom Doherty is my boss, so I'm not going to edit the article. And furthermore, the only bio I can find of him online that gives the correct date is one written by me, at http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/04/more-than-thirty-years-later-tom-doherty-is-still-curating-new-worlds.
Tom has frequently remarked on the fact that Wikipedia trimmed a year off his age and that, as a result, most other reference sources now also give him as having been born in 1936.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnh (talk • contribs) 10:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Too funny! If by "Wikipedia" you mean "me, myself and I", then I suppose that is the case. You added his DOB as April 23, 1936 in this edit in 2006. (Given that, please feel free to correct it in the article's current incarnation.) Woodshed (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That _is_ pretty funny. I have no memory of this, but evidently you're entirely correct. Clearly what we have here is an intersection of the curves of (1) failing middle-aged memory and (2) improved understanding of good Wikipedia hygiene. Thanks for the heads-up; I'll fix the entry myself. Pnh (talk) 10:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: But... but... look at the lost opportunity to join the chorus of people whining about those damned Wikipedians and how we never get anything about SF rifht! --Orange Mike | Talk 18:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Doherty was born April 23, 1935, not 1936
Talk:Tom Evslin

message: The proposed deletion of this article was contested with comment: "CEOs of major companies are notable." While that might be true for the CEO of IBM or Wal Mart, I'm not quite sure whether ITXC was really that "major" that its CEOs are automatically covered in numerous secondary sources. I'll add the notability tag again; maybe someone can find such sources. --B. Wolterding 11:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Tom Gibney

message: About halfway through Sidney Lumet's film Network, is that Tom Gibney as the TV announcer introducing "The Howard Beale Show"? He isn't credited in the film (nobody is credited for that role), but it's well known that the studio sequences in the film were shot in Scarborough at CFTO-TV. And it looks a lot like him. On the DVD (special edition), the clip appears at time 1:02:24, chapter 17. A second clip is at time 1:57:19, chapter 31. --Mathew5000 09:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a reference and put it in the article. --Mathew5000 09:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he have a cameo in the film ''Network''?
Talk:Tom McAlpin

message: in addition, Tom is in the process of brokering a deal for two new ships for Disney, names to be decided —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.233.100.134 (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks, Tom.  But referring to yourself in the third person is a bad habit, and please don't wipe out the contents of this talk page when you add a comment to it. —SlamDiego←T 16:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 

message: Indeed a majority voted to keep the article, but the articles still does not meet the notability guidelines.  The few “reliable sources” that it cites mention McAlpin in passing, and do not treat him as notable.
Thomprod's removal of the Notability tag is quite inconsistent with his suggestion of 19:18 17 January that the article be kept but tagged.  The latter suggestion is coherent exactly because the decision that the article should be kept does not imply that the article is presently up-to-snuff. —SlamDiego←T 17:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Keep” v. meeting notability guidelines
Talk:Tom Utley

message: This subsection does not represent the neutral point of view that Wikipedia is supposed to have. The Davenport-Hines "criticism" is dated 1998 and the "apology" is 2005 (the Hari criticism, dated 2004, is a dead link), so only tenuously connected. I propose deleting the subsection, but will leave for a while in case there are any comments. If the subsection is to stay, it should be written in a more balanced way. Tony Holkham (Talk) 11:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleting sourced material does not seem the way to go. I am probably being dim, but could you please spell out in which direction you think the lack of neutrality lies? SovalValtos (talk) 17:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Being accused of something (in this case homophobia, but that's by the way) and then being contrite about it some years later is not encyclopaedic, in my view. Utley writes about almost everything under the sun, and for this instance to be highlighted doesn't seem particularly balanced in the context of the whole article. I have noticed a tendency throughout WP to add a "Criticism" section to BLPs; to do so without some other information about the person makes it look as though WP is being used as a soapbox. I have no problem with the section being left as it is, as I do not take a position on the criticism, but just because it is sourced it doesn't mean it should be there. Hope that makes sense! Tony Holkham (Talk) 17:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Your explanation makes sense. I am removing the section. SovalValtos (talk) 11:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: So is Mr Utgley reliable for information about himself if published in the DM (to be more precise is the DM an RS for what Mr Utley says?)?Slatersteven (talk) 16:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Daily Mail
Talk:Tom Van Sant

message: Tom Van Sant created this image known as "The Earth from Space", as can be verified here in this link to the image.
However - the copyright filters on wikipedia won't let you add his images to his page - because as a contributor to wikipedia, I don't own the rights to the image.  But it is the artist's own work.
How to fix this? 
RedPema (talk) 05:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding images of the artist's own artwork
Talk:Tom West

message: How does one create a disambiguation page? Highlyinoffensive (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Achari (surname)

message: This should not be under Tamil Brahmins.
They are grouped separately Vishwakarmas
Not that it matters in real life. But it affects the credibility of Wikipedia.
--Sankarrukku 13:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely :-). I've just removed category 'Tamil Brahmins' -Ravichandar84 03:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ravichandar84 ji, you mean Adi Shankarachari was not a Tamil Brahmin and an Achari? In southern India is Adi Shankaracharya not called Adi Shankarachari? (Google's Search result for Adi Shankarachari, Entries in Google Books for Shankarachari). Also can you kindly explain what is "Achari" in Adi Shankarachari's name?Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tamil Brahmins]]
Talk:Slight Return

message: German wikipedia and google have quite a lot of more ideas to associate with 'slight return'.  The most prominent of which is of course Jimi Hendrix' Voodoo Chile (Slight Return).  But where does the term originate?
greybeard 20:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's all coming to your mind on 'slight return'?
Talk:Manitoba Provincial Road 280

message: I'd like someone else to review this because I am not exactly sure of the factuality of the Canadian road system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laxplayer630 (talk • contribs) 
:I've failed the article.  Issues include:
*Lead is too short - doesn't really summarise article fully.
*A mass of redlinks, not a pretty sight.
*Refs need  usage.
*Generally not thorough - I'm sure there's plenty more info in all the areas, which could/should be discussed.
:Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: 
Just a few little things. Interesting article! —Rob (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A few things you've mentioned have been my quest for over a year. History prior to 2001 (you misread the york landing thing) and getting shields in the article will be impossible due to crown copyright. Thanks, I didn't notice some stuff. Mitch32contribs 19:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops. Even then - what route to Giliam existed before Route 280? Or was Giliam one of those cities you flew into or sailed into, with no real road access? —Rob (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gillam's closest airport is in Thompson, 291 kilometres away, and I'm not sure there was any possible way to get to Gillam before 280, whenever it was commissioned.Mitch32contribs 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. I don't know if it would exist or not, or if it can be found. There are some  templates needed where distances are measured in miles, too. Somehow I missed that. —Rob (talk) 19:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With thanks to Seddon69, that has been fixed.Mitch32contribs 20:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  All right... I guess the only outstanding issues are whether or not it's totally a gravel road for its entire length, and what the mode of transportation was prior to the road's commissioning. Even if that particular bit of information doesn't exist, a bit of searched revealed some early history and at least one railroad, so at least that's something. :-) —Rob (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Added, and yes, the article is gravel its whole length until Road 290, where it becomes paved, according to the Manitoba map.Mitch32contribs 20:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. I'd like a little more content in the history section, but it might be difficult to find, so I've passed the article. —Rob (talk) 02:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review #2
Talk:Irish Republicanism in Northern Ireland

message: This article needs reliable neutral sources otherwise i'm going to propose it for deletion. Mabuska (talk) 11:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact as the article has NO sources seeing as the link provided is dead this article is virtually personal research and i am proposing it for deletion as no effort has been made to clean it up. Mabuska (talk) 12:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Unfortunately i've had to propose this article for deletion on various grounds such as no citations, sources, poor prose, bad grammer and layout, potential POV and subversive wording. There is even no need for this article as most of the topics have their own articles. Mabuska (talk) 12:37, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is pretty obviously not an uncontroversial candidate for deletion, as required for the WP:PROD process, so if you think this should be deleted please start a discussion at WP:AFD so that a consensus can be reached. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, and the main editors i can find in the history have been informed such as Superfopp and Exiledone etc. Mabuska (talk) 12:27, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article proposed for deletion 

message: Today Her Majesty's Government has published the fact the threat level to Great Britain from Irish related terrorism has risen from moderate to substantial. This is clearly related to Irish republicanism in Northern Ireland. Should the article make note of this? BritishWatcher (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:Recentism. Let's wait a while and see whether publication of the fact has any long-term significance.  Scolaire (talk) 23:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 

message: The lead needs to be improved as the opening sentencces are very choppy and staccato. I found a few typos (which have been corrected) as well in the first section, so the entire article should be double-checked for possibly more.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead is too choppy

message: Why is republicanism capitalised in the title? Irish republicanism uses a small r. Gob Lofa (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation
Talk:Tommaso Portinari

message: Hello, there seems to be some difficulty with the dates. I see that in the page in Nederlandish, Tommaso was born in 1432, this makes it even more difficult for the father to die so early. Do you have any idea ?
--ManiacParisien (talk) 05:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in 1424, father died in 1421 ? 

message: As described in the article I've added as further reading, Margaret Koster discovered primary sources in Florence's Archivio di Stato that contradict the account of Portinari's life given by Raymond de Roover in his 1963 book (currently cited in our article). De Roover claims, for instance, that Portinari died in poverty and that his son, Francesco, refused to accept his father's inheritance for fear that the assets would be unable to pay off the accompanying debts. However, according to an addendum to Portinari's will discovered by Koster, Francesco did in fact accept the terms of his father's will shortly after he died (Koster pp. 164–65). Koster does not fully describe the points at which de Roover's information is incomplete or inaccurate, so I'm not sure to what extent our article is misinformed. Any editors with access to de Roover's book may be interested in making a more extensive comparison with Koster's article. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, why don't you update the article? Johnbod (talk) 14:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory sources
Talk:Mugalivakkam

message: Emergency contact numbers and address not available in this place so,kindly add 2A02:CB80:401F:F21C:343A:47F5:96F9:A148 (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a directory. Please see WP:NOTDIR and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Rasnaboy (talk) 08:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police,Passport office  &Fire station details need
Talk:English local history

message: I moved this from Local history, as the article was all about English local history while many of the incoming links were actually about the local history of completely different places. This article was already too large to be converted to some kind of globally relevant article on the topic. As an article limited to English local history, this can still probably be substantially expanded, but one could write equally long articles on local history of Germany, France, Holland etc. 
The interwiki links have been moved to the new local history page which is now a very short stub waiting to be expanded with content on the topic of local history in general.
I re-linked the incoming links to link to this location from some articles when the context was clearly concerned specifically with the local history of England or places in England. The process was complicated by a large number of incoming links from userboxes. Pharamond 12:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead still reads like this is about local history in general.  The entire article needs more work, but I think you were right to spin this off. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The move from [[Local history]] to [[English local history]]
Talk:Overlapping generations model

message: Can we have a list of models with OLG feature? such as Peter Diamond (1965), "Government Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model". Ben Bernanke & Mark Gertler (1989), "Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations".Jackzhp (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: models with OLG feature

message: Dr. Bhattacharya has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Bhattacharya has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Andersen, Torben M & Bhattacharya, Joydeep, 2012. "A Dynamic Efficiency Rationale for Public Investment in the Health of the Young," Staff General Research Papers 35503, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Bhattacharya's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Davila has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Davila has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference 1: Implementing Steady State Efficiency in Overlapping Generations Economies with Environmental Externalities (with Th. Dao) Journal of Public Economic Theory 16(4), 620-649 (2014)
*Reference 2: Davila, Julio. Output externalities on total factor productivity. No. 2014037. Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), 2014.
*Reference 3: Dávila, Julio, and Marie-Louise Leroux. "Efficiency in overlapping generations economies with longevity choices and fair annuities." Journal of Macroeconomics 45 (2015): 363-383.
*Reference 4: Dávila, Julio. "The taxation of capital returns in overlapping generations economies without financial assets." (2008).
*Reference 5: Dávila, Julio. "The taxation of savings in overlapping generations economies with unbacked risky assets." (2009).
*Reference 6: Dávila, Julio, Piero Gottardi, and Atsushi Kajii. "Local sunspot equilibria reconsidered." Economic Theory 31.3 (2007): 401-425.
*Reference 7: Dávila, Julio. "Sunspot cycles." Economic Theory 22.1 (2003): 169-192.
*Reference 8: Dávila, Julio. "Time and uncertainty in overlapping generations economies." Journal of Economic Theory 100.2 (2001): 356-386.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Davila's comment on this article