Talk:Wikipedian

message: I feel it's more fitting to redirect it to that than to the Wikipedia article, since the redirected to-page doesn't have much on Wikipedians.--GCFreak2 04:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect this redirect to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians]] 

message: A Wikipedian is a very different entity from Wikipedia, and the Wikipedia page doesn't even have a heading or sub-heading on Wikipedians. I wonder how many people each day are frustrated by the existing unhelpful redirect.Robert Pollard (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree completely 

message: On further reflection, this should probably be a disambiguation page, between:
* Wikipedian, noun: Someone who is a participant in/contributor to Wikipedia. Wikipedians
* Wikipedian, adjective: Of or about Wikipedia
Robert Pollard (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Should we make a list of Wikipedians who contribute media content (e.g. photos) if they are williing to share their real names? -- Fplay 20:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to give credit for photos, etc. 

message: Some people like being able to user "what links here" to track their content.  How to handle this?  The article should not piont back to their home (or a subpage) in User:  -- Fplay 20:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to track 

message: Wikipedian was recently changed from a redirect to Wikipedia:Wikipedian into an article.  It should not have been a redirect across namespaces, but it also doesn't really merit an article unto itself--it serves no function except to explain Wikipedia policies and processes.  I suggest that it would best be merged and redirected to Wikipedia.  Chick Bowen 06:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We need both pages.  "Wikipedia:Wikipedian" is about "let us have a fun Wikipedia community where both experts and amateurs feel welcome and are motivated to contribute".  "Wikipedian" is about "let us make sure that the Wikipedia encyclopdia has good quality". -- Fplay 17:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

text: In discussions about this, please take into account that there appear to be highly used templates that link here in reference to "Wikipedia editor".  Take a look at "what links here."  Whatever we do should make sense with that link (or we need to change the template(s)).  (John User:Jwy talk) 00:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: 
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 16@r (talk • contribs).
:Change made as new target actually discusses the term. -- JLaTondre 22:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Wikipedia community" is now a redirect to Wikipedia, so this entry should also be a redirect to "Wikipedia". 16@r 13:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 17:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry should redirect to [[Wikipedia community]] 

message: It's a double redirect now. Jeffrey.Kleykamp 18:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double redirect 

message: This should redirect to Wikipedia:Wikipedians. Kingturtle (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cross-namespace redirects aren't popular here, though that page is certainly more relevant if we ignore the Wikipedia: prefix. I really think there should be an article about the Wikipedia community that it could redirect to, and it's probably just a matter of people finding the sources and doing the work to get such an article back up and running, and safe from deletion. Richard001 (talk) 21:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Wikipedians 

message: Needs to be retargeted to Community of Wikipedia. Marcus Qwertyus  11:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit protected 

message: Is this considered slang?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TillianBarnso (talk • contribs) 20:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Slang