Talk:Juniper Networks

message: the list of acqusitions is already in this article. Sandman888 (talk) 08:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: Does anyone else think this reads too much like a marketing pitch? I work for Cisco, so it's not appropriate for me to edit it, but it reads somewhat like competitive collateral...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.103.25.233 (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the whole article has this problem and I have marked it. --Kvng (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Most of this section is written about products that are no longer commercially available. Hence complaint on advertising is not verifiable <removing label>. Please contribute to article if some content is not high quality (currently rated B-class)  Ckt2packet (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some effort towards identifying specific issues with the article and fixing them where the solution was obvious. The article needs a lot of work to ensure that is is neutral, though. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 02:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core Wars Section 

message: Proposing a removal of this section following flags raised by from other editors.
This should take care of some buzzwords and ad-like content.
Ckt2packet (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partnership programs 

message: Greetings, I've been looking at this article, and see some missing links (like the LN Series http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information-products/pathway-pages/ln1000-series/) and some broken links (the link to "UNOS" rather than "JUNOS" ). From the instructions about editing, it seems that I should request these changes, rather than make them as I have a COI. Suggestions?
Glasssculpture (talk) 23:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the UNOS --> Junos issue. Disavian (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Thx! Glasssculpture (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction of bad links and missing links? 

message: :Giving it all she can take!
2602:252:D6A:B2C0:A8A6:DF42:3C8F:7CFA (talk) 13:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Enterprise Space"

message: I have a financial connection with Juniper Networks. 
The current article looks basically on track to me, but contains a large volume of primary sources and is about ten years out-of-date. It includes trivial promotions of the sales staff, but not more significant recent corporate issues. It contains a dedicated Criticisms and Controversy section, which I feel is equally as non-neutral as the dedicated Awards section, especially since it relies on primary sources and does not meet the criteria at WP:ORGAWARDS. 
I've prepared what I feel is a GAN-ready draft at user:CorporateM/Juniper Networks that I was hoping a disinterested editor may consider as a replacement for the current. I realize the impossibility of someone reviewing a 100+ cite article on a $4 billion+ organization with almost 20 years of history. I'll be poking around a bit to see if I can find someone with enough knowledge on the topic to be able to tell whether it's neutral. CorporateM (Talk) 19:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For the sake of transparency and future record-keeping, I'm providing links to where this draft has been discussed here and here. CorporateM (Talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft 

message: FYI - I've posted a suggestion that we re-purpose the well-sourced summary of Juniper's acquisition history from this article to the sub-article, as suggested by WP:Summary style for sub-articles. CorporateM (Talk) 20:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks]] 

message: I read the article and I have a few comments.
1. Most of the references to Juniper Networks and Cisco Systems only use the first part of the name of the companies. I fixed the introduction and the next two paragraphs but then I stopped because the amount of fixing is rather large.
2. Internet is a proper word and needs to be capitalized. I see many instances of it that are not capitalized and need to be fixed. I fixed a few but, again, more need to be fixed.
3. Some information about the crash of the company stock after 2000 should be included in the article.
4. "Juniper promoted its products as stable enough to make IT staff bored and Cisco announced lab tests from Light Reading proved its products were superior to Juniper, whereas the publication itself reached the opposite conclusion." I don't understand this sentence. It seems contradictory and illogical.
ICE77 (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on the article 

message: To understand the Juniper Networks system architecture in principle, 
Would it be ok to write the Juniper Device is based on O/S Linux based system? Goodtiming8871 (talk) 11:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   O/S Linux based system