lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Freiburg

message: Note: This page was created to put the infrastructure in place for a page currently worked on. This page will be completed as soon as possible by translating the respective German page.--Mmounties 15:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 

message: from  DPL bot (11:51,) 10 January 2013 (UTC):
:We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Freiburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wutach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
It is intended. For Deanship of Wutachtal, this valley of Wutach (Wutachtal) does refer both to the Wutach river and to the town of Wutach. --Schwab7000 (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: With a realignment of the deaneries, their number was reduced from 39 to 26. The regions remained unchanged. January 2008.
Thus, Deanship of Wutachtal does no longer exist. --Schwab7000 (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013, a ‹bot› 

message: in (German wiki): Erzbistum Freiburg, it says: Durch die Neuordnung der Dekanate reduzierte sich deren Zahl von 39 auf 26. Die Regionen blieben unverändert. (Dekanatsreform, 1. Januar 2008).
:With a realignment of the deaneries, their number was reduced from 39 to 26. The regions remained unchanged. January 2008.
Thus, Deanship of Wutachtal does no longer exist. --Schwab7000 (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEW
Talk:Glossary of psychiatry

message: The first entry on this page is a direct copy and paste of an abstract of an article listed in PubMed.  This entire article is possibly a copyright infringement and is at very least plagiarism.  Please attend to it. Kelly Martin (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright infringement?

message: The title of this article is inherently POV, assuming that everyone will be confused by the same terms, or even assuming anyone will be confused at all. I will retitle it soon. Suggestions? --Fire Star 21:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[NPOV]] the title... 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 16:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Recently 2600:1003:B03F:D8CE:FD7A:57BC:AB4D:19C2 (talk) 22:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone erased a term 

message: Had to do with denying the existence of your body parts. Not sure what it’s called 173.73.130.14 (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term that was erased…
Talk:List of Canadian organizations with royal patronage

message: What about Royal Opera Canada? Carolynparrishfan 15:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A quick survey finds "Honourary" at:
* Acadia university: 
* British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects: 
* Canadian Forces: 
* Rick Hansen website: 
* Athabasca University: 
etc., etc.
:It's a common misspelling, especially in Canada, but it's not common enough yet to be considered a correct spelling.  Check out the first few hits in this Google search, especially User:Humanbot#Faux "British" spellings. Although there is some debate there as to whether honourary should be acceptable, honorary is the least controversial spelling. Indefatigable 22:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, honour and honourable are the preferred Canadian and British spellings, but -our words sometimes lose their u's when suffixes are added.  The u stays when -able is added, but the suffix -ary is one that causes the u to disappear. Don't ask me why. Indefatigable 19:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honourary 
Talk:Rama Krishna Puram

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Lanark

message: What about Whuppity Scourie on March 1st? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.185.66 (talk • contribs) 
:Huh, that's exactly what I was just coming here to find out about (or Whuppity Scoorie). See  and .  Elf | Talk 20:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whuppity Scoorie

message: Is lanark in the south clydesdale ward of the south lanarkshire council?  Mrslippery 17:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: To me, this section seems to list too many people, and provides no references for the vast majority of those listed. There is nothing to suggest those mentioned are actually from Lanark or are actually notable. I suggest allowing a period (say two weeks) in which others can find references for those listed to suggest both notability and residency - I will help - and those who can't be referenced in that time can be removed. That will solve both the problem of the information being unreferenced and there being over coverage. --Adam Black talk • contribs • uploads • logs 00:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Lanarkians 
Talk:Andrew Grimwade

message: In the AfD vote, I promised to improve this article, and have done so.
I have researched and added the section "Conviction for fraud and conspiricy", deleted some material, and rewritten the rest. Herostratus 09:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes following AfD vote

message: I went a lot easier on this guy than he probably deserves. As far as I can see he is notable for two things: defrauding people and getting off by exploiting a weakness in the legal system, and giving some prime beachfront property to the nation. As to the latter, I don't know the circumstances, but it is entire likely that 1) he inherited the land, 2) wasn't using it, 3) got a nice tax break and some great positive publicity, and 4) might well have been practically forced to give up the land by the government who, I infer, might have owned the surrounding land and been able to cut off his overland access, certainly for construction equipment needed for meaningful development. So how great is that, anyway?
As for the rest, everything he's done is basically giving out bequests from trusts established by his forebears, and taking a seat on boards of various institutions grateful for and desirous of "his" money. Sure, he could have just played golf all day instead, but does deciding not to play golf all day rate very much praise. My dad, who was born into dire poverty, was hella more accomplished than this guy, and he's never gonna get an article. That frosts me, basically.
Plus this article was written by user "Grimwade", whose only contribution  (so far) is this article. 
I dunno. I might come back and make the felonies more prominant. I wonder... he was convicted, but it was overturned on appeal... so can I put him in the category "Australian criminals" I wonder. He was a criminal between the conviction and appeal ruling... Herostratus 09:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Snark
Talk:Steve King

message: This seems to be guilt by association, what 'far-right' policies does he espouse? As a far-right politician he wouldn't hide his far-right policies. Flexdream (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , you're right, he hasn't hd his far-right policies and rhetoric. A Timeline of Steve King's Racist Remarks and Divisive Actions, Rep. Steve King crossed the line on race by using a bullhorn, not a dog whistle, Anti-Defamation League condemns Rep. Steve King's meeting with far-right Austrian group, Rep. Steve King appeared on podcast frequented by white nationalists. "Guilt by association". Yeah, don't associate with Nazis and you won't be guilty of being a Nazi. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: " The president [Trump?] operates on the side of euphemism, just this side of euphemism". Well I'm convnced that https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/rep-steve-king-crossed-line-race-using-bullhorn-not-dog-n959161 seems a reliable source. Yeah definitely a Nazi. Thanks. Flexdream (talk) 16:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far-right?
Talk:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg

message: Both German and French Wiki show the German name as Hohkönigsburg, not Hochkönigsburg as this article had written it, so I changed it. "Hohkönigsburg" is also the form cited on p. 24 of the following:
Rudy Koshar: From Monuments to Traces: Artifacts of German Memory, 1870-1990; University of California Press, 2000; .
Sca (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Both versions would be adequate, more correct is Hoh-Koenigsburg / Hoh-Königsburg as it is the name used in this region. French "Haute" is derrived from the Frankish "Hoh/ Hoch" anyway. --178.10.209.64 (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoh — not "Hoch" — königsburg

message: Like Carcassone the architect has taken a ruin and rebuilt it the way he thought it was - or would like to have thought it was.
All the guns are fakes too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.35.207 (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Quite a lot of pastiche not to say fakery.

message: Dear All,
Further to a query regarding the correct name of the castle, we would like to hereby clarify that the actual spelling - like Koenigshoffen for the Strasbourg borough - is indeed as follows:
Haut-Koenigsbourg
(instead of Haut-Kœnigsbourg although the latter is sometimes used as well)
for this is the official one for the location as registered locally and how the Alsace European Collectivity defines it.
We are therefore handling the article’s title change process.
With best regards,
Tourism Destination Marketing & Translation Services (Alsace) (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Stand by,  Seasider53 (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

text: The official website https://www.haut-koenigsbourg.fr/fr is still prominently showing Haut-Kœnigsbourg, so you can understand the reason that editors are confused! The word of a unverified/random person on the internet is not reliable, but changing the website is something that will form part of the consideration. Best regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The said official website only reads « Haut-Kœnigsbourg » on the logo: otherwise, it reads « Haut-Koenigsbourg » everywhere (which is in accordance with the official map of France  and French official register ). The logo in question has been modified - it used to read « Haut-Koenigsbourg » too, on the previous version:  /   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cap Ferret (talk • contribs) 13:12, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual name: Haut-Koenigsbourg
Talk:Astrological transit

message: i cleaned up the glaring problems with this page.
janaka 23:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I must question this rather bizarre assumption that New York is the locale for the ushering in of the New Millennium.. but I suppose astrologers are at liberty to make up all sorts of things! Common sense would suggest that UT should be used instead of ET. Obviously this locale is americentric and would be better off removed? Samsbanned (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Millennium chart
Talk:Alpa

message: One update that should be done is to distinguish between the early small bayonet of the "standard" and the combined SLR\rangefinder bodies versus the later large bayonet. If I get time, I will provide photos.
Another might be to refer to Alpa in connection with Paillard, Kern and Alos since those are related Swiss companies (Paillard having some roots in common since Bogopolsky designed the "Bol", Kern delivering the optics and mounts of the Switars -except for the last ones , and Alos for using Alpa bodies in telephone counter cameras ). Again,if I get time for it I will provide some photos.
p.
Paul hofseth (talk) 20:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor updates 

message: I've seen some fantastic pictures taken with the new Alpas, like this one  - couldn't we add some better pictures to the articles, the current ones are pretty mediocre. Peter S. 14:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the first one is extremely blurry, especially motion blur, and the second one we can see the film grain, making it blurry as well. Congrats for getting them into magazines, getting these into a mag is one heck of a job! :-) Peter S. 23:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo examples?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/BD2412

message: Shit. This thing went by and I didn't even notice. I've been waiting for BD's admin nom ever since August, but he was so reluctant to be adminned that I thought it wouldn't happen for a long time. I just got to know about it today (okay, you can kick me now).--May the Force be with you!  Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 15:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think it was the most supported one ever.--Alhutch 18:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the RFA nomination records list. NoSeptember talk 19:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Maharaja Nandakumar

message: The page dates his lifeline to 1705+. The page also has a photo, there was no photography even in 1775 (predating the American Revolution even). The dates need correction and citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.175.91.17 (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dating

message: I think this page should be merged with Nuncomar--Dwaipayanc 15:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Here we have what is alleged to be the photograph of a man who lived and died in the 1700s. The image file does not have any source.  RaviMy Tea Kadai 16:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait of Nand Kumar 
Talk:Yale Daily News

message: Excuse me, but the Columbia Daily Spectator is an older paper than the YDN.  We were founded in 1877; they were founded in 1878. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.59.125.101 (talk • contribs)  11:41, 27 January 2006)
:Citations? Bbpen 15:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 comments 

message: The list requires references.SLY111 (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ALUMNI
Talk:Federation credit

message: When Kirk says "they're still using money" in The Voyage Home, he may be merely referencing the use of physical currency, rather than virtual currency.  After all, with the widespread use of debit and credit cards, the US, Canada, Europe and other places are seeing the decline of "cash" transactions.  The Federation "credit" would be a means of exchange.
In DS9, the Ferengi are still charging for things.  Is the Federation so primative as to have only a barter system?
I think the credit isn’t used quite like the dollar or the euro of today. But the Federation has to have some form of currency because there would still be tons of things that couldn’t be replicated. DS9 has the most proof of this from their interactions with Quark’s. I have a feeling that Quark doesn’t simply “seek to better himself”. Joe Cannibal 04:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I always thought that money wasn't used within the human race, but they used it with their encounters with other governments and races, while humans on earth still did things for nothing. It is a shame that in reality the writers of the show couldn't maintain some story arcs without using money. SGGH speak! 19:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voyage Home does not say there is no Federation Credit 

message: I redirected this content to the Federation article. Even the phrase "Federation credit" seems ORish -- it's never been referred to as such in the films or series. The content is entirely speculation and plot summary. There are no references to third-party sources. The "credit" seems a miniscule detail in the overall scheme of how Star Trek depicts the Federation's economy -- and that (notable) subject is better covered at the Federation article. --EEMIV (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:League of God's House

message: I am unsure of the translation "God's House". Gotteshaus means simply "church". dab (ᛏ) 15:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotteshaus is literally Gott = God, es possessive form of Gott meaning God's, and haus = house.  While you could call a church "God's House", God's House is a more literal translation of the name.  Additionally, literally church is die Kirche.Tobyc75 (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bone Valley

message: Phosphate mining and its processes are discussed in detail in this article about Bone Valley.  I think this section on phosphate mining should put into its own article, and a link to this article can be placed in this one about Bone Valley.--Beezer137 (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriateness of discussion of phosphate mining 

message: Topic: Geographic region; 
Map: None;
Shouldn't Wikipedia standards include that any/all articles on geographic regions come with maps?
Rtdrury (talk) 23:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  no map?
Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants: Lights, Camera, Pants!

message: There are cool extras on the Nintendo Gamecube version. 67.38.242.86 12:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GCN

message: I've made a mini-game section, but cannot remember the roles that are blank, please fill them in.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.202.17 (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mini-Games
Talk:Flemish Region

message: * Members of the flemish community parliament, who were elected in Brussels region, have no right to vote on Flemish regional affairs.
* In the infobox is listed that http://www.flanders.be is the offical website. That is not correct. That is http://www.vlaanderen.be  Flanders.be is a website for the international visitors and is not a lot more then a presentation of flanders.--Walter 00:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: als u op vlaanderen.be linksboven op 'EN' (van Engels) klinkt, komt u op flanders.be uit merkwaardig genoeg. Misschien best beide websites vermelden. --Keffertje08 (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

text: ik heb beide geprobeerd te plaatsen in dat kleine vakje (met de vermelding van de verschillende site-inhouden, maar esthetisch gezien werd het daar door veel minder aantrekkelijk. --Keffertje08 (talk) 22:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: --178.119.241.66 (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A logo is no coat of arms 

message: i agree with the person that commented before me.
That flag isn't the coat of the flemish arms at all.
It's the logo of the flemisch government.
--Belgiumrules (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  coat of arms
Talk:Robert Trebor

message: The link from the last movie in the listing, Gorp, takes you to an article about trail mix, not an article about the movie.--HarryFKaplan 15:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead & created an article for the movie Gorp, then fixed the wikilink in this article to point to it.  You should feel free in the future to be bold and make necessary corrections to practically any article you wish.--Ssbohio 03:07, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:For Nancy ('Cos It Already Is)

message: Not wishing to appear stupid, but how can this be a single and have a track listing? DJ Clayworth 15:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As it wasn’t sourced, I had to remove a story about the song’s writing. With that said, I found it interesting and so wanted to preserve it here, in case credible sources do eventually pop up: 
According to Yorn, the name of the song was inspired by a Les Paul Yorn bought at a second hand store.  After he got home from the store, he took a shower and had the guitar riff in his head.  After he got out, he grabbed his newly purchased guitar and started to play.  Unable to think of a name for the song, he glanced at the back of his pre-owned guitar and for the first time noticed the name "Nancy" scrawled into the back of it. (Anecdote retold by Yorn during a concert in 2003)
Cheers! — Historical-idealist (talk) 16:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  For posterity…
Talk:Mine Squadron 7

message: Landed here by accident. Should this page be deleted as it means nothing to me, it lacks any context and nothing links to it. 
Seems to be a complete copy of a private webpage. Is anyone able to improve it, or should it be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.12.179.77 (talk • contribs) 
:I agree with you completely--that it should be deleted as an unsalvageable mess, and have prodded it. --Fuhghettaboutit 01:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add a tag showing that you are editing it at this time.  Thx. --Mboverload 05:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks like you did that for me. I've made major changes, it looks much better now. Also much of the wording has been changed to prevent any copyvio complaints. ⇒ SWATJester  Ready  Aim  Fire! 05:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The opening paragraph states: "The word Commander in the unit's nomenclature refers both the entire unit, the headquarters section, and to the actual commanding officer." I've always believed that the COM part (as in ComMinPac, ComSubPac, ComPhibLant et.al.), refers solely to the Commanding Officer of any particular unit or formation. If so, should this article be renamed "Mine Squadron 7", and all references to COMINRON changed to MinRon, apart from the paragraph headed "Mission of Commander Mine Squadron Seven", which does seem to be about the person, rather than the unit.And does anyone know what a "danning ship" is?dawkeye (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs renaming? 
Talk:Tom Wappel

message: I would put the neutrality of this article under discussion [unsigned]
What specifically do you have a problem with?  I went out of my way to avoid bias when I wrote this article.  CJCurrie 17:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wonder whether the sentences these sentences really belong here: "The Liberal constitution was amended following Chrétien's victory, permitting the leader to appoint candidates in certain ridings. Chrétien defended the change as necessary to prevent "single-issue groups" from taking over the Liberal Party. It was generally understood that Liberals for Life was the primary target of this remark.[14]"  It strikes me that this more properly belongs in the Liberals for Life article, and that it is tangential to Wappel himself.   (I will not be offended if someone reverts me on this: perhaps a rewrite to make the connection more explicit is in order?) Bucketsofg 05:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK.  Bucketsofg 01:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Liberals for Life rule