Talk:Philip Sidney

message: I unfortunately removed a vast amount of data that was added by an anon editor.  It seemed to be from an academic paper, with multiple footnotes, and I noticed that it contained citations from the 1980s.  I did not look for the text to determine if it was available online or not.  I reverted this to a page prior to the addition of this material and added the copyvio notice.  If the anon editor is in fact the author, this can be undone, but this needs to be made with explicit permission (and  you probably should have a login ID as well.)  Thanks --- Smerdis of Tlön 13:46, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: For gods' sakes, it's mentioned in the Defense of Poesy, whereas Austria and all that jazz are not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.67.160 (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added the Kingdom of Hungary 

message: Wouldn't this article look much nicer if the references in the sentences were moved to footnotes. 128.250.217.20 06:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in the sentences 

message: the present comments on "defense of poesy" is clearly a revenge of prose against Philip Sidney's radical position against philosophy and history. None of the assertions can stand a quotation of Sidney's own words. Above all the reduction of this extremely deep text to "neo-platonism" is an illustration of Sidney's allegoric image of prosaic insinuations out of poets eggs immediatly cannibalize its genitors.
A huguenot metrician —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.123.53.163 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 8 June 2006
I think that the final three sections (Influence, Significance, and On Method) should be formed into a new page and simply linked to this Sidney page. I'd do it right away, but I'm not sure which references go to which section. Tell me what you think on my page, please. Scoutersig 16:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defence of Posey 

message: It happens to be a fact that Philip Sidney is one of the main characters (if not the main character) in The Armor of Light by Melissa Scott and Lisa A. Barnett. I am quite not up to speed on what the correct way to mention that in the article would be, but surely it deserves a nod of some sort or another. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 11:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main character in a work of fiction 

message: No mention of the python sketch featuring michael palin as sir philip sidney.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.40.206.42 (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  monty python 

message: http://wiki.umd.edu/psidney/index.php?title=Main_Page
It is not clear if this is one of the most magnificent funeral processions of the time or merely one of the best documented.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fotoguzzi (talk • contribs) 18:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidney's funeral 

message: B-class??? As it stands, this "article" has almost nothing to to with poetry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.174.211 (talk) 22:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Quality 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Philip Sidney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516000249/http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/defence.html to http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/defence.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218180925/http://www.arts.gla.ac.uk/SESLL/EngLit/ugrad/hons/theory/CultMaterialism.htm to http://www.arts.gla.ac.uk/SESLL/EngLit/ugrad/hons/theory/CultMaterialism.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified