lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Siobhán McCarthy

message: :This is a BLP that was created in 2007. Regardless of what was "allowed" then, current broad community consensus is that an unsourced BLP does not warrant a stand alone article. I moved an IMDb link (that was placed inline) to an "External links" section. IMDb is supposedly acceptable for limited use as a source. After examining the site I will object to any use as it is still user generated with limited vetting oversight. However, the current policies and guidelines do not have a gray area that a single source (primary or not) gives a pass for inclusion. If no other acceptable sources exist then the subject is not notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.  Otr500 (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Added some refs, could use more. Originating major roles in notable West End productions (Mamma Mia!, Chess, Evita) meets criteria for :WP:NACTOR. Removed the IMDB and notability tags, replaced with a ref improve.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Eadwine of Sussex

message: The article needs a list of sources (in Notes or References section) instead of just the numbered hyperlinks sprinkled through the text. --Meyer 04:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Surely this individual was an ealdorman and not a king. The Kingdom of Sussex ceased to exist in the mid-ninth century. "Dux", after all means ealdorman in tenth-century charters. I can't see any source for naming him as "king", or am I missing something? Retroplum (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ealdorman not king?
Talk:Siphiwe Tshabalala

message: Not in the style of wikipedia but made me smile nonetheless. Should be changed eventually.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.144.240 (talk) 15:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Cup 2010 Goal Update 

message: How is pronounced family name:  or ? Kikos (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: This article has been subject to some heavy vandalism, I have attempted to revert the most recent cases but since I am not an expert on such articles I'm not sure if the current article is accurate. Feel free to revert to an earlier version of the page if some of the information is still innaccurate. Polyamorph (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I've removed "He is arguably one of the most legendary left wingers in the world." as there was no source and it seems very exaggerated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.208.244.61 (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  one of the most legendary left wingers in the world
Talk:Michael Lyons (BBC chairman)

message: If Sir Michael's performance at the BBC is on a par with his performance as Chief Executive of Birmingham City Council and as effective as his review of Local Government reform it will not be too long before we say goodbye to the BBC as we know it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.163.200 (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: What is Sir Michael Lyons' religion? 
Does anyone know if he is affiliated to any secret societies such as the Freemasons?--Wool Bridge (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion and core beliefs 
Talk:Set-theoretic topology

message: Whats the point of this article.... the title is "set theoretic topology" and the entire article just says "This is the study of set theory and topology" ???? why bother making this lol.... so redundant and pointless
24.13.184.155 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a stub.  It's waiting for someone to come along who can give a serious overview of set-theoretic topology, which is a genuine field and certainly not just the intersection of set theory and topology. --Trovatore (talk) 19:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point
Template talk:Sussex monarchs

message: Based on Template:Kings of Wessex using information from Kings of Sussex. --Meyer 05:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: I suggest that OE letters be changed to modern equivalents in this template.  I think "Æ" and "æ" can be preserved, since they are still in use in modern English orthography, but "þ" has not been in use for centuries.
The relevant guideline, Naming conventions, makes it clear there's debate on similar issues, so I thought I'd post here before making any changes.  If I hear no objections I'll make the edits in a few days. Mike Christie (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old English letters
Talk:Sirivannavari

message: 223.205.9.49 (talk) 02:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Sakura Cartelet Talk 02:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2017 
Talk:Shannon–Weaver model

message: Communication theory expects the model to effectively establish the discipline in a structured, scientific way. There are nonetheless missing interpretations of this model on the basis of language, for instance: the model is clear on the level of entropy effective communication requires (that is, 50%) and, for instance, message intensity related to distortion levels in the message, acknowledging an increase in information channeled implies an increase in distortion associated with the message. These are interesting interpretation, including them should help practitioners.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.240.181.18 (talk) 18:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution to Communication Theory 

message: The article has:
:while essentially inventing what became known as the dominant form of "information theory."
I'm not sure what is meant here, but suspect it should rather be this:
:while essentially inventing the dominant form of what became known as "information theory."
--Nø (talk) 13:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Pauline Engel

message: "In 1957, the long held dream of the Sisters of Mercy to establish a Catholic girls' school on the North Shore was realised. Carmel College is the Mercy Charism which is still at the heart or centre of the school.": saying the school consists of Charism breaches neutrality. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutrality
Talk:Slaid Cleaves

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this new interview with Slaid Cleaves. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the interview and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section. In the interview, he discusses his recent work, his influences, and political songwriting, among other things. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! Mike harkin (talk) 22:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up, I plan to work on this article soon and will take a look at incorporating the info.  Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 23:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link suggestion: New interview with Slaid Cleaves
Talk:Kwakʼwala

message: The phonology of Kwakw'ala is very similar to Abkhaz phonology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abkhaz_phonology
The consonant inventory and article text disagree on the orthography for glottalized sonorants. We have ˀm etc. in the inventory chart, and mˀ etc. in the text. As far as I know, both preglottalized and postglottalized allomorphs of all of these consonants are attested, so I think either representation is plausible. To make things consistent, I'm going to change the inventory chart to bring it in line with the article text. Jiashudiwanjin (talk) 17:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding the request for further citations or verification which has been added to this article -- should that really be understood as a request for more information? There are plenty of gaps in this article, and it would be great to get those filled in. However, the amount of cited works seems quite appropriate, with predominant use of the seminal linguistic work on the language (Boas' grammar) supported by other books and articles where relevant. I am curious as to whether people really feel that there are not enough references used in this article, and if so, which other sources should be relied on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiashudiwanjin (talk • contribs) 04:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It may just be a request for more inline citations.  If nobody minds, I can go through the article and add  to unsourced statements.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 08:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds good! Jiashudiwanjin (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for citations or for more information?
Talk:Blue Moon Rendering Tools

message: With all due respect to the "Pixie" renderer, is it appropriate that it's singled out as an alternative here on the BMRT page? ERobson 05:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They should bever have quit teaching sentence diagramming ...
"sued" is the fifth word in the sentence. Pixar sued Exluna and Gritz. To be more correct, Pixar brought suit in a court of law claiming damages. Exluna and Gritz were the defendants. (Yes, in civil court there aren't 'defendants' but I forget the correct term at the moment.) 
Pixar sued for "patent, trade secret, and copyright issues" which is not exactly correct. They sued for damages and based their claim on patent, trade secret and copyright regulations. But you get the idea .. or maybe not :)
Gritz and Exluna "flatly denied" the claims (i.e., damages based on patent, trade secret and copyright regulations.) 
Yes, the sentence is not written in the best journalistic style but it is understandable. Maybe I'll go change "flatly" to "categorically" ...  210.22.142.82 (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

message: How so? Could someone possibly elaborate on the statement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.130.6.148 (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "precursor to Gelato"??? 
Talk:Sobit Valikhonovich

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 03:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]].
Talk:Sofka Zinovieff

message: I did not understand what you mean with "(reverting unsourced and potentially libellous additions made by MangoTreeTop - see OTRS email 2010081010004327 and do not revert without adding reliable sources". What did you think was potentially libellous and what does the email and long number refer to? I'll wait for your explanation before I continue editing the article since you seem to know what you are doing. Mangotreetop (talk) 20:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The email refers to an emails which Wikipedia received complaining about recent additions to the article. The long number is a 'reference number' to the email in our secure system. The problem is that statements such as "Sofka has published pro-PASOK government articles but without declaring her association. " need a source to back them up - a reliable source (see WP:RS). You also state that her grandfather was a homosexual - again, we can't say that without a solid source backing it up. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP Issues
Talk:Soichiro Fukutake

message: I have tried to remove some of the more obvious sections with unencyclopedic, non-neutral tone. Still the article needs more work to present its facts in a neutral, uninvolved 3-person view. Currently it spends too much text to present the topic's visions and good work. Those accomplishments should be described as neutral facts (without subjective judgement), and sourced by uninvolved, reliable sources. Speaking of sources: the article only has 1 source, which is not nearly enough to source the amount of included detail information. Editors possibly connected with the article topic should read WP:COI and WP:NPOV. GermanJoe (talk) 07:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Issues have been adressed (thanks). When re-adding any content, please make sure that it's neutrally worded and sourced. GermanJoe (talk) 04:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV-issues, promotional tone
Talk:Solange Wilvert

message: This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
*:meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. (talk •  contribs)  03:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: modelsobserver.com links
Talk:Great Comet of 1577

message: This tiny tidbit in the article makes me cry out for more detail -- how did Brahe work out that the comet travelled above the atmosphere? What about his observations led him to that conclusion? Collabi 09:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. Sorry. I'll try to work on that one. ♣ ÅñôñÿMôús  Dîššíd3nt 10:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travelled above the atmosphere 

message: Is it possible to detect the comet at its current distance of 317 AU? We know where the comet is. Could the Hubbell telescope or successor to the Hubbell telescope see something? How bright is the comet? Mschribr (talk) 09:45, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Very Large Telescope had a hard enough time detecting Halley's Comet in 2003, when Halley was only 28AU from the Sun. At 300AU comets are pathetically faint.-- Kheider (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detect the comet at distance of 317 AU 

message: There is a reference to the comet in a Scottish chronicle.
"1577. The fyrst d. of Nowember thair rais a come in the sowt-sowth-vest wt a gret beme rysand up asclent fra it, passand a gret space in the firmament."
(1577. The first d[ay] of November there rose a comet in the south-south-west, with a great beam rising up aslant from it, passing [through] a great space in the [dome of the] sky.)
The Julian calendar was in effect at the time, 1577 -- a difference of 13 days from the calendar of the 21st century -- so the date given is accurate.
This is published in a volume called Extracta E Variis Cronici Scotiae: From the ancient Manuscripts in the Advocates Library in Edinburgh published by the Abbotsford Club in 1893.
The 1577 comet entry comes directly after a 1575 entry about a deformed calf born locally, and is very likely to have been written in 1577; it is part of some marginalia & addendums in the handwriting of the 16th century, added to a much older chronicle. These are known as the "Rosslin" additions, as the chronicle was in the possession of the Sinclair family of Rosslin from about 1550.  E Kane109.144.143.2 (talk) 12:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary References 
Talk:Cesar Picton

message: In the beginning it says he died in 1836 where as the "Tradesman to gentleman" section says he died in 1831. Which is correct ? Jay 09:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1836 - corrected. Johnbod 09:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date?

message: Hi, I boldly made a number of changes to this article all of which have been reverted on the grounds of change of citation style. I'm not clear which change is seen as controversial, the more consistent use of templates or changing "notes" and "references"? Happy to discuss and at least make the less contentious changes in the meantime --KenBailey (talk) 05:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Point taken and my apologies for overdoing it. --KenBailey (talk) 16:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I don't know what to do about dead-links used as unique sources. I'm inclined to leave them in case someone is keen enough to search Wayback etc, or find the page at a new address. Johnbod (talk) 17:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I had already done precisely that using the cite web template, and, to digress, I looked for, but couldn't find, archive copies of the two dead links in External links so they should come out altogether per WP:LR. I still hold that citation templates would improve this article. I'd like to know what other editors think. --KenBailey (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation style
Talk:Sondra Prill

message: Listed for PROD with the reason "Appears not to meet general notability guideline. Only two sources, but they both share the same last name and may be related. Cursory scan of Web search results turns up mostly blogs." Williams is a very common surname; no reason to think they are related. I have found and added a review from 1992. As coverage ranges from 1992-2007 (and videos of her have been uploaded to Youtube from 2007-2018), this should at least go to AfD. Obviously not in the same league as Florence Foster Jenkins, but in the same mould. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD removal
Talk:Sonia Isabelle

message: Who's your Bagh-daddy? LOL  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.62.162 (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sonny Silooy

message: Silooy has not played any game with Ajax during 1994-95 season, cf.
http://www.rsssf.com/players/ec1winningsquads.html, 
http://www.rsssf.com/miscellaneous/player-trivia-ecups.html & 
http://www.beijen.net/frank/cvs/silooy-s.htm
Also, in 2004, UEFA has made a list of footballers to have won all three UEFA competitions and the only Dutch in list were, in chronological order, Arnold Muhren and Danny Blind.--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sono Osato

message: *From 1935 to 1941, her parents were the caretakers of the Phoenix Pavilion and its Japanese garden, both of which had been built for World's Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1893.
::Not sure if this is relevant for this article as it's about her parents, not her. MurielMary (talk) 08:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this relevant?
Talk:Sooraj Barjatya

message: In these edits I removed fluffy content from the lead. "Cult classic" is an overused fluffy term. Virtually everything has a cult following because everything is liked by somebody. There were also repetitive and subjective statements about "hit" and "trend setting" that only serve the promote the subject.  The statement that critics and the subject considered Hum Aapke Hain Koun..! as his best work to date, might be true, but it's unsourced. 
Then here I had to get rid of more of the fluffy garbage from the article. Does someone really think that "huge box office hit" is appropriate tone for a neutrally-worded, objective encyclopedia? Or that we should be describing films as "blockbusters", a subjective term that has no specific academic value? C'mon. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Looks like that last nonsense was added years ago in 2007. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluff alert
Talk:Sophia Williams-De Bruyn

message: So those women marched against equal treatment with men in the number of 20.000 to the Union buildings (fenced off today). Aren't we frequently told that South Africa prior to 1994 was some kind of "racial dictatorship". --154.69.21.159 (talk) 22:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astonishing 

message: bibliography of Sophia Williams in an essay format 105.245.175.58 (talk) 11:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography of Sophia Williams in an essay format
Talk:Doctor Doctor (American TV series)

message: One secondary character doesn't really make the show LGBT-related... Is he all that important to the show? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess winning GLAAD awards counts :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT?
Talk:Sophie Cabot Black

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* Tables may be used to organise short stories, poems and/or book reviews. 
* While I would prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, the Wikipedia Manual of Style at WP:MOS requires "title case".
* ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference.
* Links to potentially unreliable digitised copies may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 01:41, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Soren Thompson

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Sparkle Moore

message: I've just reverted a major rewrite of the article by User:Sparkfriend.  In the rewrite's edit summary, the version to which I'm reverting was described as "inaccurate and incomplete".  Unfortunately, the new version was excessively promotional and used a non-encyclopedic tone, and fixing it would have been a major project.
I'd like to suggest that User:Sparkfriend try again, but only after reading WP:NOTPROMOTION, Wikipedia:Encyclopedic_style#Information_style_and_tone, and WP:NRVE.  The version I reverted failed all of those: it read like something that'd been put out by Moore's press agent; it was not written in an encyclopedic tone (among other things, numerous uses of "rockin'" and the insertion of a slogan in all-caps); and it relied heavily or exclusively on Moore's own website, with no use of reliable third-party sources.
--Ammodramus (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Major reversion
Talk:Spencer Kayden

message: She entered Northwestern University as "Spencer Shapiro," under which name she presumably graduated.  Her birth name is "Deborah Shapiro."  Her freshman year at Northwestern began in September 1986, and she graduated from the then School of Speech in June 1990.  The first incidence of her stage name, "Spencer Kayden," is cited in the references to her participation in the Neo-Futurist's original production of "Too Much Light Makes the Baby Go Blind."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:987:4100:77ED:DD76:14A9:D274:21F7 (talk) 00:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your contributions, please provide sources. JesseRafe (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced details