Talk:Restoration (Spain)

message: :Copied from Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2007 September 11 for processing. --Ghirla-трёп- 20:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The consequences of 1898 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  — Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 16:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Restoration (Spain) →  – Per WP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION and WP:CONSISTENT for consistency with the article title Bourbon Restoration in France. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It may well be known more as "the Restoration", just like the Stuart Restoration is also more commonly known as the "Restoration", but that article was moved 2 days ago for natural disambiguation reasons. The standard title formatting for monarch restoration articles is now House Restoration, and there's no reason why his article title should not be made WP:CONSISTENT with all the others.  Rreagan007 (talk) 03:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What article are you talking about? We are assessing the common name for this article (and if it is concise and precise enough vis-à-vis the compromise between WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and the potential existence of alternative possible targets for "Restoration (Spain)", and, let me assure you, the Stuart Restoration is not one of them). Period. Nobody should be interested on your insight on the historiographical coverage of the Stuart Restoration, as it means nothing here. Nothing. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Renaming articles of historical periods from disparate locations (each one with its own historiographical context, treatment and corpus of sources) to mimic each other just for the sake of a greater "cosmic balance" or whatnot is just like the worst idea ever, and if that's the sole intention behind this request it should be speedily closed on a procedural basis. This dubious proposal also seems to be funnelling the misguided idea that the primary scope of this article concerns a punctual act of restoration, which does not (that was the coup d'etat of Sagunto), and not a regime or a historical period of a given country, as in "let's rename all the articles about a monarch returning to throne that have Restoration in the title the same way", oblivious to the fact that the articles' scope may span to far-wider reaches and have its "own life". The proposed changes bring no further delimitation of the topic and go against WP:CONCISE. If the topic isn't deemed the target par excellence of any (Bourbon) Restoration in Spain (I think it is indeed the target par excellence of any "Restoration (Spain)" as per coverage of sources using the term, as neither the Bourbon restoration of 1813 neither the Bourbon restoration of 1975 are framed on such basis to the same order of magnitude in historiography, and that's the case I am making here: the current setup is concise and fine) a name such as "Restoration (Spain, 1874–1931)" or something like that may be discussed.--Asqueladd (talk) 10:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 February 2021 

message: Was there a absolute monarchy between 1923-1930? There is no source on the article and nothing in the article says that the constitution was changed to grant the King absolute power instead it says “Primo de Rivera proceeded to suspend the Constitution and assume absolute powers as a dictator.” ImperatorPanda 17:19, 2 June 2021, (UTC)
:I was just confused by exactly this, at no point in time did Alfonso XIII rule as an absolute monarch. It seems like on 16 March Oliver de Rodriguez changed it from "Autocratic monarchy" (also inaccurate) to "Absolute monarchy" without explanation. I also have no idea where JTDG2005 got any of the information that they added to the infobox in June, also without explanation, as it is not only largely inaccurate but has turned the "government" section of the infobox into word salad. Adding "authoritarian" next to "military dictatorship" seems pretty redundant, as does adding "Catholic" into the form of government when Roman Catholicism is already listed as the state religion. I went ahead and reverted a bunch of the changes and altered it to reflect a more accurate and comprehensible reading of the history, but I'm more than happy to discuss this further if there are any objections--Grnrchst (talk) 18:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolute monarchy? 

message: The Restoration section of Contemporary history of Spain is longer and more in-depth than this article. That article is also tagged with WP:SIZE issues. I propose splitting some of the content from that section into this article, though I don't know where to start -- I first came here just to copy edit.
~ Malvoliox (talk) 16:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add content from Contemporary history of Spain article?