Talk:Stanisław Koniecpolski

message: Sorry, zapomnialem go wstawic nizej.--Emax 13:27, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: To any English native speaker, to proofread the article and improve the language. Tnx. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:21, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done this. Hope this helps! Also, I've resubmitted to peer review. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:31, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am submitting it to FAC now. Tnx for your input. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:38, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: *The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
*Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article.  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.
*Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
*Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.
*You may wish to convert your form of references to the cite.php footnote system that WP:WIAFA 2(c) highly recommends.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. 
*You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas. 
*Thanks, Andy t 21:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: A few weeks ago I put in a citation request here for "and on 8 June the Treaty of Kurukove was reinstated." It was answered by this book ref . Radek, I believe you inserted that ref to support the clause, could you clarify how the book ref supports the citation request. I don't see June 8 mentioned in this context or Serhii Plokhy describing it as a reinstatement of the earlier treaty. Novickas (talk) 00:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you put in a citation request for that? The history here indicates that the citation was there (I can't remember if I'm the one who added it) before you became active on the article. Anyway, I'll look into it.radek (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Yup. Checking the history, , what you actually made a citation request for was the next sentence in the same paragraph.radek (talk) 00:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Right, I probably meant to reference the first sentence and first part of second (siege, could not break its walls, Cossacks lacking suppliesetc.) I think it's fine now. I've noticed the discrepancy with the other sources in how the outcome is described. Will look into it in more detail shortly.radek (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Carification requests

message: As per a request on WP:MHA I have completed the checklist on the mil hist banner. I have rated it as a Start class article (please note the project banner does not support C class). The reason for this is the large number of citation needed tags means that it cannot pass criterion B1 (referencing). Also there are a number clarification tags (e.g. Which? and Who? etc.) hence I don't feel that I can pass it for criterion B2 (Coverage and Accuracy). The start class assessment is unfortunate, as I believe that the article is generally of a good standard and as such I ask contributors to not take the rating too personally. Once these issues have been address, you might like to consider requesting another mil hist assessment. This can be done by going to WP:MHA and adding the article to the list. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As I mentioned in the FARC discussion, I don't think I'll have time (and sources) to work on this till XMAS. At that point I should be able to add the missing refs and clarify the remaining issues. Do note that anybody with access to Podhorodecki's book could do this. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  19:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mil hist project assessment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stanisław Koniecpolski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.muzeum-polskie.org/muzeum/beauplan-eng.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118080040/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Stanislaus_Koniecpolski to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Stanislaus_Koniecpolski
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified