Talk:Ursula Andress

message: The Wikipedia article itself states that Ursula Andress is recognised as being "a major sex symbol of the 1960s". She should be remembered as such.
I propose that the Infobox photo, showing her to be a haggard old woman beaten by age, be deleted.
We should remember her as she was not as she is now.--87.243.196.167 10:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please point to where on the Help Desk anyone "gave you permission" to emove the image?  Wikipedia is not censored.  There seem to be few, if any, free images of Ms. Andress, and the image that was there is one that's available.  Your view of the image eing of someone who is "a haggard old woman beaten by age" is merely your own point of view, and somewhat ageist, at that.  I will be restoring the image until you come up with a reasonable argument as to why the image should not be there.  Corvus cornix 17:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Photo

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 06:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Ok. There is one huge problem here. The Filmography. It is verbatim to the filmography on the IMDB 
or at least the first 8 listings, but have a feeling the rest follows suit.
Beamer 20:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Neither of them included Five Against Capricorn, but Wikipedia does now!
Chris 03:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: You seen her now? She look like a zombie!
Can we include that?
Please?--Crestville 16:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Then & Now =

message: I thought I'd read at one time that the (younger) drummer from some rock group was married to her, like Bon Jovi or something.
66.68.159.105 (talk) 04:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like she was a hooker beeing with so many gays 2600:1700:D828:E080:1CDB:5A1A:EBF9:8E34 (talk) 00:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Marriage? 

message: I'm cutting this paragraph, because it strikes me as a very minor bit of trivia, and as written it took me several re-reads just to figure out what it was saying:
:Andress has the singular distinction among Bond girl actresses of having actually appeared in the narrative of a Fleming novel, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, written after Fleming was present during filming of Dr. No. She is pointed out to Bond by Irma Bunt while they are dining at Piz Gloria.
If it seems like it belongs somewhere, I would suggest putting it in one of the hated "Trivia" sections, and definitely re-writing it for neutrality, something like:
:Ursual Andress in mentioned by name in the text of the Ian Fleming novel On Her Majesty's Secret Service (Fleming had been present during filming of Dr. No):  She is pointed out to Bond by Irma Bunt while they are dining at Piz Gloria.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doom (talk • contribs) 01:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  trivia 

message: Wasn't UA the female lead in the cowboy movie "Red Sun" with Charles Bronson or just an extra?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.199.154 (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is listed as Soleil rouge, Englisht title Red Sun. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  an extra then? 

message: You've now twice reverted improvements to the citations of this article:  && . You've also reverted any other tidying-up I did. I view this as disruptive and regressive, and the recent ANI thread rather went against your position. Twice. Your resistance to improving the referencing is at odds with the improving Wikipedia aspect of IAR, and the notion of avoiding proper endashes and adding useless null- templates to support an obsolete browser used by a minuscule and only declining number of people is simply inappropriate. This is, of course, pretty much the same issue as with Halle Berry, Uma Thurman and Miranda Kerr. I know that some folks here know and respect you, but you're new to me and all I'm really seeing from you in this area is you raising these issue regarding my editing, and not any of the myriads of other users running WP:Reflinks. Merridew 01:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is the same issue, citation templates. Now, can you please cut the rhetoric? I'm not "resisting" your "improvements"; I disagree that cite templates are always and in all ways improvements. Enough other editors similarly disagree that this issue is even written into a guideline (WP:CITE), and I think you know that. I've tried to retain other tidying-up you do, but when you make an omnibus edit, it's possible I've missed something you consider important. If so, what is it? Gimmetoo (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seems to me you're the strident one. This has been to ANI, what?, four times? A few editors support what you're after, but most are raining on your approach and on your singling me out for your reverts. Your mantra of maintain the status quo is at odds with the nature of a wiki, which is that things change. Time for you to drop the stick, methinks. Merridew 03:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you want to talk about substance and attempt to achieve resolution, or do you want to continue with the rhetoric? Gimmetoo (talk) 03:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I expect you to stop dogging my edits and making inappropriate reverts, as many have advised you. Merridew 03:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's the rhetoric again, claiming I'm "dogging" your edits and the reverts are "inappropriate". At some point, that sort of repetition has to be dealt with. Objectively, your edit (which installed citation templates in this article) was not in accord with WP:CITE. Do you want to talk about that? Or would you like to discuss the table issue? (You might find we have some agreement there.) Gimmetoo (talk) 03:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:   It [templates] has been talked to death, and it's getting old. I've improved these articles; you've managed to regress some of them. People see this. There is not a significant table issue; just an obsolete browser issue. We should use the endash, and sort templates on the names, as needed. Safari v4 is down to 0.7% from 0.8%, as of a month ago. Merridew 04:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then what would you like to discuss? Ideas to avoid future conflicts? (If you identify that an article already has developed with cite templates [ie, has a lot of refs with nearly all using templates], then you're probably not going to get into any conflicts by adding a cite template for some urls a new editor just added.) We could also discuss the relative importance of various errors the scripts generate? Gimmetoo (talk) 04:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BRD 

message: I strongly suspect that Rolf was a Nazi. Has any one any details about his expulsion from Switzerland and alleged disappearance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.30.71.244 (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The source mentioned does not mention the vanishing directly, only the expulsion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.30.71.244 (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolf 

message: 'Sure it was with David Niven in the 1967 James Bond Casino Royale spoof - not Peter Sellers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.130.124.66 (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 15:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie - Casino Royale 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ursula Andress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216074258/http://www.srf.ch/player/tv/10vor10/video/happy-birthday-ursula-andress?id=6b52dc71-9c72-4489-80f7-21a0861f55de to http://www.srf.ch/player/tv/10vor10/video/happy-birthday-ursula-andress?id=6b52dc71-9c72-4489-80f7-21a0861f55de
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ursula Andress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713145625/http://www.goldenglobes.org/browse/member/30387 to http://www.goldenglobes.org/browse/member/30387
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is that photo of her disrobing really necessary? It seems inappropriate,to say the very least. 86.158.122.137 (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph