Talk:Bellwether

message: Is there a quote / source for JP Morgan being mentioned as a bellwether stock?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.146.191.222 (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  JP Morgan? 

message: On 05 July 2017, Fred Carstensen, added "This is an inversion of the original meaning as the bellwether, because of his emasculated conditioned, always stuck close to the flock; his bell alerted the shepherd to its location."  He also changed "leading his flock to "following his flock."  I could find no support for these changes in any resource, but I certainly was not able to find any examples of usage from the 14th Century, so "following" may indeed be correct.  In fact, the best reference I found was on dictionary.com: "Figurative sense of 'chief, leader' is from mid-14c."  In order to stimulate discussion, I have undone Fred's change. BAlfson (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: In 2000, Delaware did vote for the candidate who received the most votes from voters, so in that sense it was an accurate bellwether for total votes in the country. A bellwether can be for which candidate receives the most actual votes from voters, not just which candidate received the most electoral votes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nightkey (talk • contribs) 22:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But the popular vote doesn't actually mean anything in such systems. And this is particular crucial as in most elections decided on a constituency basis bellweather seats/states are heavily targetted precisely because of their marginality, and thus are where the winner is made or lost. Timrollpickering (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I disagree that it doesn't mean anything. A bellwhether accurately reflects the votes of the larger group. So, New Mexico slightly going for Gore in 2000 was a much more accurate reflection of the votes of the nation (which went for Gore) than Utah overwhelmingly going for Bush, even though Bush was the electoral college winner and thus the winner. Nightkey (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Considering the quagmire that was the 2000 election, the disputed result of that election (should it be counted as a win for Bush, as forced by the SCUSA, or as a win for Gore, as independent audits seem to indicate a full recount would have been?), and continuing questions about voting practices in the state, I do not believe including it as a bellwether would be a good idea, since it would simply open up a can of worms.  When people start talking about Florida as a bellwether, perhaps then, but that hasn't happened as of yet. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 02:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bellwethers in 2000 

message: This is a copy and paste job from Encyclopedia.com
:I think you may have it backwards, and Encyclopedia.com took its entry from here.  I know that some parts of the article are original, since I wrote them myself, from scratch.  Can you identify which parts of this article you think may be a copyright violation? Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 22:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: * Delaware used to be a bellwether state, but it's failed two in a row, so it's no longer a bellwether  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.140.37 (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Delaware 

message: I would love to see more countries added but of course it comes down to "as information becomes available". I am sure we can find some more bellwethers if we scan at least the Anglosphere, starting with big ones like India, Ireland, Kenya, New Zealand, Nigeria, and South Africa. BTW, I plan to WP:BB and move the UK to fit the rest of the alphabetical order. :)--Thecurran (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country Order 

message: Bexar county has been won by the winning presidential candidate since 1972. I cannot understand why it is not on that list of top 50 bellwether counties in the country. In 72 it went for Nixon, 76 to Carter, 80 and 84 to Regan, 88 to Bush, 92 and 96 to Clinton, 00 and 04 to Bush and 08 to Obama.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supun47 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bexar County

message: I have re-written it. Missouri, Delaware and the not-there-before I added it Illinois are former bellwether states. The part about states winning "most" is super-meaningless  because it necessarily favors older states, so I've eliminated it.
This is an honest, non-politically motivated question: What does the statement "Donald Trump won Missouri in 2016 by as many as 19 points, which suggests it will likely be less of a bellwether state in future elections." on the page mean? If Trump won Missouri and the nationwide election, then how does that suggest that Missouri will be "less of a bellwether"? Unless I've completely missed the point of the term, 2016 continues to add to Missouri's tendency to match the eventual outcome.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.160.226.96 (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it was 22% more Republican than the national average.
Bomberswarm2 (talk) 02:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States section 

message: This article is full of original research.
If a certain state is considered to be a bellwether state - well, who says so, and where's the source? It's not sufficient to just list the numbers and demonstrate that it is. That is precisely what they call "original research".
Half the sources given don't prove their point either. They may support the numbers, but using the numbers and connecting them to the concept of the "bellwether" which was never even used in the source is original research just the same. --93.212.247.60 (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: "New Jersey is the only state that wasn't in the 1988 Dukakis strategy to give all of its electoral votes to the Democrats in every election since 1988."
What does this mean? Bush won a dozen states that Dukakis didn't that haven't voted Republican since.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bomberswarm2 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illogical 

message: Colorado might be considered a bellweather in recent years. Only 2 misses since 1980https://www.270towin.com/states/Colorado, and 3 misses since 1964https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elections_in_Colorado. Not only that, but Colorado seems to lead the way for trends: For example, Colorado was one of few Western/Southwestern states to go for Obama in 2008, but subsequently Arizona went blue in 2020, and Democrats have been performing better in Texas. Colorado was also the first state to legalize recreational marijuana in 2012, which is now a policy sweeping over other states across the country.
Some references to sources suggesting Colorado is a bellweather:
"BIDLACK | Colorado is the nation's new political bellwether," Colorado Politics, 2018 - https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/bidlack-colorado-is-the-nations-new-political-bellwether/article_6b75d936-e8e4-580d-af89-ffa2cfc2b538.html
"Colorado Bellweather," Washington Examiner, 2014 - https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/colorado-bellwether
"If You Want A Bellwether In Trump’s America And Blue Colorado, Look No Further Than Pueblo," CPR News, 2020 - https://www.cpr.org/2020/02/28/if-you-want-a-bellwether-in-trumps-america-and-blue-colorado-look-no-further-than-pueblo/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.128.36.228 (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Bellweathers for Modern Era 

message: I've just tagged this article with multiple issues. The core is that this article seems to be a parking ground for a ton of original research on which counties/areas/states/etc are bellwethers - and very very little of this article is sourced to reliable secondary sources which discuss the "bellwetherness" of the jurisdiction. I don't have the time or energy to clean this up this very second, but within the next few days I intend to go through and remove any information that is not directly sourced to a reliable source. Unfortunately, this will result in the removal of some sections altogether. While I feel comfortable and confident that I'll be able to easily find and include information about the USA, and likely about some other countries, I do not feel confident in my own ability to find sources for and "fix" some of the other sections - and I suspect that many of them may require foreign language sources to assist in the cleanup. I invite anyone able to assist with sourcing to do so, and I'll try to leave any information in sections that I can find sources for when I find the time to clean this up. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 09:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of article 

message: I'm chasing down the meaning and etymology here in response to a recent Heather Cox Richardson essay. She refers to a "bellwether" as "fitted with a bell to indicate where the flock was going". This article, to my surprise, agrees with that definition: "A shepherd could then note the movements of the animals by hearing the bell, even when the flock was not in sight." But it then sources that to merriam-webster -- which contradicts this definition. "Long ago, it was common practice for shepherds to hang a bell around the neck of one sheep in their flock, thereby designating it the lead sheep."https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bellwether So at the very least we have a sourcing problem here in this article; and we also have an interesting case of the meaning of a word being essentially reversed, from "leader" to "follower" as "bellwether" is used in the metaphorical sense. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indicator? Or leader?