Talk:History of Brazil

message: Like some other Brazil-related articles, this one has repeated references to "miscegenation." Currently this term is considered offensive, according to Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.143.146.234 (talk) 04:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Miscegenation" offensive?

message: It is a mistake to call them "stone age" as this is a term applying to a chronological period, and its use here is Social Darwinian.  Whilst Tupi-Guarani language emerged later as the major family, the decimation of Indian populations leaves us ignorant as to which was originally numerically preponderant. John D. Croft (talk) 21:09, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: The low social indicators and the huge national debt are by no means a result of the Fernando Henrique administration. The national debt was acquired during the dictatorship, and has been a growing problem ever since, and the social indicators actually rose quite a bit between 1995-2001. I've corrected this. --Paraiba 04:52, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you looked at the figures? The national debt at the end of the dictatorship was about US$ 100 billion, and decreased under the following governments -- until FHC's.  It skyrocketed again under FHC (to over US$ 450 billion), because of his economic policies which aimed at fighting inflation at all costs.  In particular, he borrowed massive amounts of money at extremely high interest rates in order to sustain the 1R$ = 1US$ illusion.  It was FHC, not his predecessors, who created the present "unpayable" debt -- and that was only one of his many disastrous "achievements".  Let's give credit (or rather debt 8-) where credit is due. Jorge Stolfi 05:42, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be fooled by statistics. The federal administration assumed the state's debts and broken regional banks as a measure to contain inflation and improve national accountability. Check the "Fiscal Responsability Law".   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.19.222.161 (talk) 03:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: National debt

message: Brasil was not the only country of the New World to effectively establish a monarchic state; Mexico did it twice; though the first one was short-lived, the second one re-arragned the country adminsitratively and politically. --J.Alonso 18:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, and one of its Monarchs was actualy a cousin of D. Pedro II of Brazil. Daniel
yes and Pedro died in a killing he lifed 1825-1891 also Genarl Manuel D. da. Fresca was or put himself in a place of honor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessekisser23 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not true. For starters, Canada, Jamaica, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vicent and the Grenadines are all "New World" countries that happen to be monarchies. 187.34.78.211 (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Empire of Brasil

message: The view of seminomadic hunters and tribes living off the wilderness of the the Amazon jungle has been challenged since the 1990ies. I am not an expert on that and refer to the article  "1491" in "Atlantic Monthly | March 2002" (http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200203/mann). Author Charles C. Mann refers to recent research by archeologist Anna C. Roosevelt of the Chicago Field Museum of Natural History and several botanologists and geographers. They indicate that the indigenous population before 1491 had created the rain forest ecosystem by systematically planting trees and shrubs and  ameliorating the soils. The Amazon Rain Forest -if this hypothesis stands- is not a wilderness but the result of human activity. 
I think this idea should be mentioned. --Kipala 11:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Precolonial culture

message: I was on the main page and I started reading and on the 5th paragraph, the first line, some of the text is blocked and I can't read it.  I'm relatively new to Wikipedia so could somebody else please move the picture slightly so it is readable.  This is a realatively minor problem
Thanks
Nelson
: I'm not sure what generic solution there is for this, but if you make your browser window bigger, it should solve it. Mlewan 17:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or make the words smaller. Aran|heru|nar 04:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Wiki Formatters 

message: That wasn't Jango, that was Quadros, a completely different guy. So, only as a precaution, I'll add a "citation needed" thing to the rest of the paragraph. Also, would you mind reading a book about the subject before writing it on the wikipedia? I don't go around writing that Lincoln wrote the declaration of independence of the United States. --200.222.30.9 20:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right. Unfortunately, there are only 4 or 5 active editors in Brazilian topics right now and we're all busy going after a GA status on Brazil. I guess this is a good place to have the next WikiProject Brazil collaboration.--Dali-Llama 21:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to hear that. Only on my second read I noticed that problem, so I fear there might be other crazy stuff around there, and a less prepared reader could take them as truth. I'm specially concerned that the thing on military dictatorship mentions little of the US role on the events apart from the Escola Superior (not even a mention of operation Brother Sam, for instance). Ignoring that is like ignoring the role of the British Empire on the war of Paraguay, or North-American role for the end of Vargas dictatorship. History is too important a thing to be forgotten. But anyways, best of luck. --200.222.30.9 22:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decorated Che Guevara

message: I've moved the Infobox up to the "abstract" (introductory) section. It still needs some better-ification from someone who's familiar with Template Editing... cheers201.27.222.29 23:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Brazil -- BOX 

message: Added a POV to that section, as it really lacks a NPOV, more like a newspaper article then an encyclopedia entry. 200.196.123.49 (talk) 04:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like a style rather than content issue. Please specify biased statements. - RoyBoy 20:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Dictatorship (1964–85) 

message: This section says that Goulart was in favor of the Bay of Pigs; yet another unreferenced Wiki article says the opposite. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Brazil  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.115.111 (talk) 20:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knocking on the barracks door 

message: I think, this article has almost no information on the dictatorship in 80s and transition to direct elections of presidents. It would be great if some one can fill in this gap. I'm unable to do this.
178.0.1.141 (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  From dictatorship to redemocratization 

message: I've deleted this phrase, because without explanation, it's implausable that indians crossing the Bering strait in Alaska walked (?) all the way to Brasil. We need at least a few paragraphs to cover what happened there.  Why not also cover geologic history, before humans arrived (i.e. the separation of South America from western Gondwana, the spread of rainforests and the rise of the Andes mountains?)  This article is really about Portuguese/European history of Brasil, and starts with what little we discovered about Brasilian indians when Europeans got there.Sbalfour (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indians crossing bering strait 

message: Indigenous monarchy is not an adequate term for the Brazilian monarchy, considering that the monarchs descended from two of the most traditional European royal houses. And the country itself saw itself as a continuation of the Portuguese monarchy in the Americas. 200.250.25.114 (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous monarchy 

message: Brazilian speak brasilianease 43.231.29.148 (talk) 09:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazil