lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Coles

message: Thank you to all the contributors : this article has now been translated into FR. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated into FR  

message: Could someone please add a photo of Peter from the Sussex University website (a quick google search will take you there). I'm not experienced enough to know how to access images from online sources. Thanks in advance, TheGodOfHellfire (talk) 15:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Peter C. Aichelburg

message: It should be mentioned in the article, that he is already an emeritus. You can see it here (i.R. stands for "im Ruhestand" in german. "im Ruhestand" means retired). --80.109.39.94 (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks it is mentioned in between. --Axisstroke (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emeritus
Talk:George Duckett (Calne MP)

message: I have a question.  1717, Duckett does his book on the value of ecclesiastical lands at the time of the dissolution.  I follow others by saying that's apolitical, but I'm not at all sure that it is.  George I is on the throne, and he's low church.  Monasteries and religious houses still existed in the Anglican church.  More to the point, th church held a lot of land.  Would a thing like this have been bait to the king -- a promise of a man who is not afraid to tell the crown how much they could get by taking the lands of the church?  Could it have been a threat to the bishops?  It's quite a time to do a book like that, and, given how everything else Duckett did was Whig, I wonder if it is innocent.  Wondering isn't enough, of course, for including in the article.  Geogre (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any George I political experts who drop by.... 

message: The box on this article competed with the lede and said....  Well, it said that he was an MP and attorney, which is what the first sentence said.  It then had his descendants.  Well, genealogy is something Wikipedia is not.  A succession box for MP is fine, I suppose, if it's at the bottom of the article, where people wanting to know the history of a seat may find it.  There isn't anything about Duckett that really makes him boxable, and so it was noise, not signal.  Utgard Loki (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it wasn't so controversial after all.  Huh.  Utgard Loki (talk) 19:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unboxing Day
Talk:Per-Olov Löwdin

message: Adding all these publications is a noble effort, but do we really want a full list of his publications? Wikipedia is not a directory. There must be several places where his publications are listed that we can use as a reference. Only a few of his more important papers should be listed. --Bduke  (Discussion) 23:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of publications
Talk:George Durant

message: Some feel that the Bondurant family of fame in the Alabama area - as extreme, rich traders
in even earlier times (1600-1700) - is the same family as George Durant.
/s/ researcher 75.58.176.111 (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have any infomation on his burial site? Is there a visible grave marker now ? Engr105th (talk) 23:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial Site ? 

message: The article states this in the 5th paragraph: "By 1662 Durant was living on his property in Virginia on the Albemarle Sound, which became North Carolina in 1665."  But the Wiki article on North Carolina suggests the Carolina colony did not separate into North and South Carolina until 1729. So it wasn't 'North Carolina' in 1665, as I read it. If no one objects, I'll re-word this soon. (It won't materially change anything, but hopefully eliminate any potential ambiguity for researchers of the colonial era)...Engr105th (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed this to read Carolina colony. NC and SC divided later. Engr105th (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colony timeline
Talk:BMW N52

message: Hi, corrected some of the engine data (N52 is successor to the M54, not the M52, and added new versions of the 3-liter N52B30 and new cars that it wasn't listed for.
I'll tooth comb this and other BMW stuff when I have time.
Jussi 09/22/2006 3 am EST
Added a self-taken picture of my N52B30 (195kW/315Nm version, build date 06/11/06) and listed which of the models with the 3-liter N52B30 were exclusive to Europe.
I can be contacted at jkorkala@gmail.com if you are a BMW/NA/N52B30 fan like myself.
Jussi 09/22/2006 5 am EST
The 328i/xi outputs are not correct for the US.  Somehow it seems that the US engine isn't even listed.  Specs are here: http://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/3/328xicoupe/techdata.htm
How can this be the world's lightest 6-cyl? Surely there is a smaller-displacement engine somewhere that qualifies for the title? Plus, if the given weight of 354lbs is correct then it would be heavier than its own granddaddy the BMW M20.69.205.239.137 (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lincoln Henry Jelliff

message: There is an obituary available that was originally published in the Lethbridge Herald on 25 September 1948, however it is likely still under copyright so I have not uploaded it. Andrewbore (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obituary 
Talk:George E. Chamberlain

message: *Gaston Aboutmovies (talk) 07:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for expansion/citations

message: , I noticed your addition of a redlink to the Linn County Rifles. I suspect, but am not certain, that this is the same entity as the Oregon Rifles (or at least, a local group that was a sort of subsidiary to the Oregon group) -- so I made a redirect. Any idea if my assumption is accurate? -Pete (talk) 01:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I had never heard of the group before. The site the info is from, the Arlington National Cemetery site, seems to be a private website that had Chamberlain listed as "Junior" rather than "Senior" (I drew the mistake to the owner's attention yesterday), so I would take the precision of that name with a grain of salt. I'd even be tempted to change it to Oregon rifles editorially, in fact. Carrite (talk) 14:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, check that — the date doesn't work. The Oregon rifles came a decade or more ahead of the Bannock War. It's a good question... Carrite (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hmm. The Googles are not terribly forthcoming. What seems most likely to me is that OR existed as a general concept starting in the 1860s, and the more local LCR formed (perhaps later on) as sort of a local chapter (of murderous maniacs, or whatever we should call them). -Pete (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linn County Rifles = Oregon Rifles? 

message: Regarding the move of this page, George E. Chamberlain (59%), George Chamberlain (34%), and G. E. Chamberlain (6%) are the only iterations of Chamberlain's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in Oregon. Star Garnet (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Paul Neményi

message: Back when it was a substub, pretty much all this article said was that Nemenyi might be Bobby Fischer's father and that he worked on the Manhattan Project. This is pretty much all that Fischer's obituaries said. Now we have a much more detailed, sourced article, but the constantly repeated journalistic claim that he was on the Manhattan Project has vanished. There may well be a reason for the disappearance, but what is it? --Paularblaster (talk) 19:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manhattan Project 

message: People have spent a lot of time trying to understand Bobby Fischer's mind and bizarre behavior, given his singular dominance in chess. As such, this article would probably be very helpful if it included the well-traveled anecdotes about Nemenyi (obviously Fischer's father) wearing his pajamas under his suits and keeping soap in his pockets so he could wash his hands after touching doorknobs. (I put this BACK on the page because it's not a forum post, it's a mention of specific information that is likely relevant to the article and should be included) 72.79.76.198 (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should probably mention his personality quirks 

message: Something is probably off here. 72.79.76.198 (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In his 1964 exposition ... " Nemenyi died in 1952. 

message: The article originally stated, "in his 1964 exposition," Nemenyi was dead by this point, and according to sources the paper wasn't published in 1964, so I just removed the year completely from the sentence. Likewise, the end of the article mentions him being the father of Bobby Fischer right before the extra section discussion it. So I changed the end of the previous section to just say that Nemenyi was survived officially by one son, leaving the mention of his likely fatherhood of Bobby Fischer to be discussed completely in its own section. 72.79.76.198 (talk) 18:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed redundant reference to Bobby Fischer and also an unclear and possibly incorrect date reference
Talk:Paul Drude

message: Adding a note on the correct pronunciation of "Drude" would be great. An online science dictionary  suggests 'drüd' (the way I always said it), however some prominent scientists (in the US) pronounce it 'drüdə'. What is the correct pronunciation? Kaschev (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: Contrary to the claim in this article, his suicide is explained in a recent article in his journal: it was probably due to stress from overworking.
"He was overwhelmed. [...] Finding no honourable way out, and not communicating his desperation to colleagues at Berlin, Drude committed suicide."
- http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/116843695/abstract
Harald88 (talk) 09:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  not "inexplicable"
Talk:Harry Selby

message: Are people sure about the date of death given here?  I seem to vaguely remember him backing Scottish Militant Labour candidates in the 1990s. PatGallacher 00:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Peerage" site the date is taken from has been known to be wrong, but given his unending loyalty to the Labour Party, support for SML candidates sounds unlikely. Warofdreams talk 02:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George FitzRoy, Duke of Northumberland

message: Can't be the third and youngest illegitimate son of a man who had at least four (and more) illegitimate sons. If there are four and he's the youngest, he can't be third, he must be fourth. If there are four and he is third, he can't be the youngest (the fourth would be youngest). Please square this up. What would be more important would be to, as a matter of policy, vet stuff like this against your other articles and resolve inconsistencies BEFORE you publish. I am really quite convinced that such checks are NOT standard operating procedure at Wikipedia. Standard procedure seems to be publishing and then discovering disagreements vs. other articles only when someone like me complains on the talk pages, unable to make a correction for lack of knowing which of two irreconcilable Wikipedia articles is wrong.2604:2000:C682:2D00:4983:DD1:23A9:990 (talk) 06:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:George F. Hoar

message: Regarding the move of this page, George F. Hoar (55%), George Hoar (31%), George Frisbie Hoar (7%), and G. F. Hoar (6%) are the only iterations of Hoar's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Nima Arkani-Hamed

message: Can we resolve the edit war over Tabriz? I don't care, one way or the other. It seems to me to be a trivial issue, and if it can't be resolved, it is best left unsaid. But whatever resolution is arrived at, it is better than an edit war, that's for sure. TomS TDotO (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it quite interesting how you, while complaining about supposed “prejudices” against Azerbaijanis (which has nothing to do with Arkani-Hamed’s page on Wikipedia), began to use blatantly racist rhetoric against Armenians. The irony seems to be completely lost on you. 93.185.44.231 (talk) 15:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabriz 

message: If his parents were in Iran up to the revolution, why was he born in Houston in 1972 (if he was)?108.201.221.204 (talk) 06:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 
Talk:George Furey

message: As he is about to attain age 75, won't he be aging out of the Senate at the end of this session.  Doesn't this need to be mentioned in the article? 2600:1004:B180:D453:0:38:AA3C:4701 (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aging out
Talk:Nicola Cabibbo

message: Hello! Why is there an Asian text in this English Wikipedia article? I think someone who knows which language it is should move the text to the Wikipedia in the right language. Thanks. --193.196.36.22 (talk) 06:25, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asian text 
Talk:George Gavan Duffy

message: He shouldn't be described as "Duffy"; his surname was "Gavan Duffy".86.42.201.128 (talk) 09:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Snappy (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Duffy
Talk:Nathan Rosen

message: I added the 1935 original references to the text paragraph although they are already listed in the Selected publications. 
Astrojed (talk) 22:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  While Working With Einstein 

message: N. Rosen is well-known for being a proponent of the Copenhagen interpretation while having communist convictions (discussed in Freire, Jr., O. The Quantum Dissidents: Rebuilding the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1950--1990); Springer: Berlin, 2015). I think the article should address these with respect to his transition to the USSR. --129.118.34.92 (talk) 22:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political significance 

message: Looking at other people's infoboxes - the use of one or the other of these 2 fields is rather inconsistent. But using both is just wasting space isn't it?
MarmotteiNoZ 00:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox: nationality vs citizenship
Talk:List of mayors of Manchester

message: Between 1838-1892 Mayors did not have the title "Lord Mayor" in Manchester  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.158.20 (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it possible to include the date, or at least the month, when the office changes from one person to the next?  Thus, if one were trying to find out who the Lord Mayor was in (say) July 1998, you would get a clear answer.  The current table would leave you wondering whether it was the 1997-1998 Lord Mayor, or the 1998-1999. -Silhouettist (talk) 09:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of change
Talk:George Goschen, 1st Viscount Goschen

message: Lest other users are confused by my statement in the article history, the section I stated the alteration was made should have read Other Public Positions.Cloptonson (talk) 19:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification about paragraph alteration

message: I have added comment regarding his grandfather's biography, cited to Spinner and Goschen's work itself, about alleged Jewish origins.  I do recall an anecdote recounted retrospectively in George Riddell's publication, More Pages From My Diary, 1908-1914 (first published 1934) - although I hesitate to introduce it in the article because I sold the book some years ago and cannot cite page number, date of the diary entry, and any source Riddell gave for the anecdote.  Riddell recalled a Victorian practice of Chancellors of the Exchequer selling on their robes of office to successors, noting that Goschen refused the offer of Lord Randolph Churchill's robes, leading the latter to comment that he thought "he would have liked old clothes!"  The comment was immediately explained in parenthesis "(G[oschen]. was a Jew.)"  At the time of the diary entry both Churchill and Goschen were dead.  If any user is fortunate enough to have access to a copy they are welcome to provide me the details I would have put in.  I have found no mention of any Jewish ancestor on either side of his parentage in what reference books (eg Burke's Peerage, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography) I have consulted.Cloptonson (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged Jewish Origins

message: As President of the Poor Law Board, Goschen published the notorious "Goschen minute" in 1869. His criticism of the Reform Act 1832 led to the transfer of poor relief to the Local Government Boards in 1871. --Kolya (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goschen minute
Talk:Mike Morris (physicist)

message: Please abstain from nonsensical deletion of references to Usenet activities, verifiable with a personal inquiry with their author.
Larvatus 04:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks DGG. Just to clarify: In my opinion, there is no reason to question whether the person is notable enough or meets the criteria for inclusion --- based on his scholarly work, he obviously warrants an article. I am only concerned about the criteria for inclusion of information about such things as Usenet participation (or Wikipedia editing/Blogspot commentary/Yahoo discussion list entries) in biographies, unless there is a degree of verifiability. I turned to WikiProject Biography/Science and academia first, because if this person's participation in Usenet discussions is a well-known fact among his peers and colleagues, and if his authorship of the Usenet posts is undisputed, then I would not have a problem with the inclusion and would see no reason to take it to the BLP-noticeboard. However, following the links provided, I did not notice any posts where he actually claims to be the scientist of this article, but I may very well have missed it. The posts I encountered also seemed totally unrelated to issues in the field of physics. Actually, the only post connecting the two was the bad faith posting linked above. Concerning your question about the basis for my concern: as demonstrated by the mocking/sarcastic use of a similar moniker on Usenet (again, see link above), there is an element of anonymity (and maybe also bad faith) in the posting activity there, as in all other types of user driven online activity, and therefore it would seem there is no guarantee that people are who they say they are, or that a (very common) name is not used by someone else with that name. This worries me, especially when it comes to inclusion of such participation in biographies of living persons. However, I have only vague prior knowledge of this person's scholarly work and no familiarity at all with his online activity, which is why I asked for assistance. I ended up here only while randomly searching for instances of blogs etc used as sources or listed under external links. If you feel that there is no reason to doubt that the person behind the moniker is the same person as the subject of this article, then I would trust your judgment. However, I disagree with the implication that things published in online blogs/discussion boards/etc generally belong in biographies of living persons - especially if the posts linked to from the BLP article lack an official e-mail address that demonstrates the authenticity of its origin, such as for example a university e-mail address, in this case. Best, Afv2006 19:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Usenet
Talk:Mieczysław Wolfke

message: Dennis Gabor was awarded the Nobel prize in 1971 for the invention of optical holography in the early 1950s.  The statement here that Wolfke worked on optical holography in 1920 needs either to be deleted, or backed up by reliable reference sources Epzcaw (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who invented holography
Talk:Menas Kafatos

message: Per the discussion held here. Logos (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 
Talk:Max Abraham

message: heyy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.53.176.36 (talk) 15:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  5612 
Talk:George H. Tinkham

message: we had new-duplicate articles. I merged the small amout of non-dup info fromthe other article. Please check my work. -Arch dude 23:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged info from [[George Tinkham]] 

message: Will Lang, Jr.'s profile of Tinkham, already cited once in the article,  has 
more notable details about Tinkham that should be added.  22:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Life'' magazine reference
Talk:George Hamilton (city founder)

message: The article claims that he was a Canadian politician.  I am questioning this, because for the fact that when he was born in 1788, there was no country named Canada.  All of the area what is now southern Ontario and southern Quebec, was officially a British colony named Province of Quebec.  It wasn't until 1791 when the whole land was split into Upper and Lower Canada.  Canada itself, did nto become independent until 1867.  Norum 16:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Canadian''
Talk:George Hamilton, 1st Earl of Orkney

message: If anyone is confused as to the naming of the offspring of Anne Duchess of Hamilton, and William, Earl of Selkirk, I suggest visiting Lennoxlove House. There, on the main staircase, are contemporary portraits of all of the male offspring of that union, including "Lord George Douglas-Hamilton"  The frames, which were specifically made at the time for the paintings, all clearly bear the surname Douglas-Hamilton. If specific Douglas-Hamiltons chose to shorten their names for brevity's sake, or others chose to call them by one or other of the compound surname, that does not alter the fact that they were still Douglas-Hamiltons. The only true unadorned Hamiltons of this family were the oldest brothers, as Duke of Hamilton. Brendandh 11:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Douglas-Hamilton/Hamilton

message: One source () asserts that the Earl "was deeply involved in plans for a military uprising in support of James Stuart" and that "at least two of [his/his brother's] nephews were also involved". I would add this to the article, only the source does not elaborate nor provide a date when these plans were drawn up. —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind: Woodard muddled two George Hamiltons, according to another source (). —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 18:54, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A short biography of his Jacobite contemporary of the same name is available (). It states that his contemporary died decades earlier, in 1715. —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A contemporary of the same name
Talk:Theodoric Strabo

message: Which dynasty he belonged to? Isn't he Amaling too?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greutungen (talk • contribs) 12:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not entirely certain.  I seem to remember somewhere that he is a distant cousin of Theodoric the Great, but I am not entirely certain of the degree of relationship, or if the are "cousins" in the sense that they are both from the same Gothic branch (Ostrogoths)... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 15:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dynasty 
Talk:George Henderson (Manitoba politician)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 00:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 