Talk:Le Monde

message: I did a bit of reorganization and added a few bits, including the section on editorial structure. I hope someone who knows more than I will expand it. glasperlenspiel 05:44, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone please detail editorial structure. 

message: "Writers of lead reporting articles are not hesitant to venture interpretations and predictions in a manner which might surprise readers accustomed to American-style reporting, with its emphasis on 
objectivity, "just the facts", and leaving judgements up to the reader."
What does the surprise of readers accustomed to American-style reporting have to do with Le Monde? The sentence also implies that American newspapers are impartial. It is both Americo-centric, and bias. Misodoctakleidist 01:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Especially since the news reporting of major US newspapers such as the New York Times is full of sneaky opinion (i.e. opinion presented in the guise of objective reporting). David.Monniaux 06:34, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

text: profess neutrality in their straight reporting Yes, they pretend to do so. Let's not confuse what people claim they do and what they do in reality. David.Monniaux 10:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American-style reporting 

message: I would like to see a mention of the Clearstream Affair added, but I don't know enought about it to do so.
Can you provide a link or reference or simply illustrate the importance of including such topic within this article?--Balthazarduju 07:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearstream Affair? 

message: "with a circulation in 2004 of 371,803"; I don't understand this phrase. Please clarify and also update it. --Octra Bond (talk) 02:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  phrase 

message: :Category:Newspapers published in Paris is itself a category within :Category:Newspapers published in France. — Robert Greer (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Newspapers published in France]] ''vs.'' [[:Category:Newspapers published in Paris]] 

message: There ought to be a footnote somewhere explaining why Mr. Alain Bauer played such a prominent role in the direction of Le Monde a few years past. He is, of course, a constitutional lawyer, but it would nevertheless seem unusual to a faraway observer to have a Masonic master either leading or helping a major French newspaper, as well as being a powerful figure in the recent Sarkozy government. ADM (talk) 10:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Le Monde and Alain Bauer

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Le Monde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130916145335/http://www.ojd.com/dyn/_files/books/181-Book-20082009-Presse-Payante-GP.pdf to http://www.ojd.com/dyn/_files/books/181-Book-20082009-Presse-Payante-GP.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The English version of this page contains en entry for the Russian paper Pravda. This is obviously not correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:1600:A672:313C:122B:61E1:1C28 (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English version describes "Pravda" 

message: Here's a strange couple of sentences: "Le Monde has been found guilty of defamation for saying that Spanish football club FC Barcelona was connected to a doctor involved in steroid use. The Spanish court fined the newspaper nearly $450,000"
Firstly, since the fine must have been in euros, why is it converted into US dollars? Fine for an exclusively American encyclopedia, I suppose, but not really acceptable in an international one.
Secondly, why is there no date and this rather odd use of the present perfect rather than the past simple, as if to say that Le Monde has been found guilty just now, or that it has been found guilty at some point during its existence, rather than pinning it down to an identifiable event?
82.28.107.46 (talk) 23:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  FC Barcelona case 

message: I am surprised to see Valeurs Actuelles qualified as right-wing or far right, and not see a similarly dismissive adjective applied to Le Monde, which is as much militant as Valeurs Actuelles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plm203 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Le Monde not qualified as "centrist", "far centrist", or "left-wing"? 

message: Photos of France 89.240.150.226 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi my name is Brian. In my late father’s scrapbook. 📔 there is about 30 pictures of the beaches during the Second World War.some of the beaches during the fighting. On the beaches with damaged tanks.and boats. And unfortunately there are some bodies on the beaches. Plus some of the victory pictures of General de Gaule. Going under the ark de triumph. In a ww2 tank . Plus kissing the French flag 🇫🇷. Didn’t know if you might like to see them. Not sure how to send them to you. Thanks Brian. Uk 🇬🇧