lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ʽAbd al-Qadir Badayuni

message: I have created a stub.  I stopped because taking it all from Britannica won't necessarily create the best article and is paraphrasing too much from one source. gren グレン 04:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV 06:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I'm not good with Wikipedia, but I feel the need to bring this to someones attention. The uncited claim for the rivalry with Fazi has support on page 571 of this book:
http://books.google.com/books?id=ycgNAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA571&lpg=PA571&dq=mullah+shabri&source=bl&ots=B3a23cuhp-
And 255-256 of this book
http://books.google.com/books?id=qVA-AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA251&dq=razmnama&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kSoYUbDSD5S60QGlwYGgDw&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=razmnama&f=false
He basically talks a lot of trash about Fazi. In the intro to his chapter in the second source the editor talks about how he was super religious and strongly resented Akbar and his ministers including Fazi.
This doesn't indicate that Fazi felt likewise, but it certainly indicates that Badauni had strong animosity towards him for religious reasons.
Perhaps a more able editor than myself can use this information to improve the article?
Best wishes
Nightpotato (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for rivalry with Fazi claim 

message: The major biographical dates were taken, according to reference provided, from Enceclopedia Britanica but don't match the information there. Date and place of birth and date and place of death, at least, might need to be more thoroughly checked/sourced?!
In office since 2019?! Looks a bit like this page was subject to subtle vandalism.
Michtrich (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradicting information?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to any particular title at this time, per the discussion below; no evidence of the proposed title being the common name was presented. Please feel free to repropose the alternative suggestion if necessary.  Dekimasuよ! 04:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ʽAbd al-Qadir Badayuni →  – WP:COMMONNAME This is the common English name. SKAG123 (talk) 01:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 December 2023
Talk:Tribunal

message: In some jurisdictions during civil trials a jury can return a verdict even if they are not unaminous.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.42.86.27 (talk • contribs) 
: Quite, and "tribunal" can refer to any judicial body before which one appears, including a single member. I appear in front of tribunals with only one member frequently. So, pretty unhelpful a definition and wrong on almost every count. What's right? Francis Davey 11:03, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited the article to try to give an accurate picture of what a tribunal is. I've deleted all the material about unanimity. Many courts also have more than one member sitting on them. I really don't see why any discussion of a rule of majority should appear here. Francis Davey 15:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  the issue is that the entire article is of poor quality. The concept of tribunal exists independantly of the specific instances mentioned in this article, and essentialy represents trial by a panel of judges, without a jury component. For instance, all international courts are and have been "tribunals" to the best of my knowledge. occasionaly they may be a single judge, but this is more properly "trial by judge". . . Tribunals have been used in ancient rome, israel, and in modern times by militaries all over the globe, as well as in international usage. 74.138.206.229 (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tribunals are to public-affairs Activists what Parliament is to public-elected Politicians. Both are equally important. 110.225.238.185 (talk) 19:44, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republic Tribunals supplement and complement Democratic parliament
Talk:Pythian Home of Missouri

message: Removed content that was advertising rather than informing: "This architectural wonder is once again entertaining the citizens of Springfield!" This is an encyclopedia, not an advertisement. From one Springfieldean to another (I'm assuming), please don't make us look like hicks who are new to the Internet. 50.83.171.4 (talk) 08:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedia vs. advertisement 

message: : Not verified tag, re: "The castle is certified as haunted"  Please cite a source for this verification.  Xaosflux 05:01, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: The addition of the conflict between the castle's owner and the city are current events and should be included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.160.240.251 (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Events 
Talk:Boozefighters

message: I do not know if anyone else is currently monitoring/editing this article, please advise if you are. 
The "History" that is currently shown here, is disappointing to say the least. It is my goal to correct this.
I am currently creating  what I believe to be a more appropriate article in my sandbox. Please have a look.Hoke35 (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of intent to make this article more accurate and referenced. 

message: The following sources may be useful to expand and improve the article:
* Here is an entire 288-page book about the Boozefighters, published by Motorbooks, which is an imprint of The Quarto Group
* Here are five pages that covers the organization here and there, along with conveying information about other clubs, in Biker Gangs and Organized Crime, published by Elsevier Science
* As These search results indicate, the Boozefighters have received coverage in a lot of different books.
*Per these search results at Google News Archive, the organization has received a fair amount of press coverage through the years
It would take some time to go through each book and news source from these search results to discern the level of coverage in each one, and whether or not it is significant or below the threshold of significant coverage. This is due in part to preview availability being inconsistent at times. North America1000 19:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: lol, I thought maybe "booze fighters" meant they were trying to stay sober 76.158.183.93 (talk) 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of name
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Neil Cicierega

message: So, what's the right thing to do with my comments being reclassed as sockpuppetry when I have a history of actual editing & contribution to Wikipedia?  I don't want to reedit & start a round of pointless back & forth, but neither do I want to be lumped in with the straw votes.  What to do, what to do... Ssbohio 05:07, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI (well, for anyones information, really): I responded on your talk page. --Locke Cole (talk) (e-mail) 13:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cthulhu Mythos arcane literature/to do

message: *Book of Azathoth
*Book of Dzyan (no merge, but section describing its relation to Cthulhu mythos would be useful)
*Book of Iod
*Cthäat Aquadingen
*Cultes des Goules
*Dhol Chants
*Dwellers in the Depths
*The Ford Translation of the Voynich Manuscript
*G'harne Fragments
*Ghorl Nigral - created by Willis Conover and vignetted by HPL
*The King in Yellow (probably no merge, but description of incorporation into mythos)
*Massa Di Requiem per Shuggay - an opera, thus not relevant (disputed)
*The Necronomicon - One of the main books (if not, the most) - Sir Winston Strangeways (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Books to add
Talk:Odd Job Jack

message: Are there plans for a fourth season?
--68.150.69.36 08:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth season? 

message: I just wrote a notes and a references section and they don't appear on the page even though they appear in the source. Kc4 19:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: problems

message: This article seems to have the same problem I often come accross when talking about OJJ, or seeing publicity.  It's inconsistent as to whether the first 13 episodes are 2 seasons (of 6 and 7 episodes), or one continuous season.  They broadcast separately, and in reruns they loop separately through the episodes, but the the season following them was frequently billed as season 2.  Which side of the fence Wikipedia adopts is a minor issue, but the article should be internally consistent.  Thoughts? Asasa64 04:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has confused me too but the offical OJJ take is that each season has 13 episodes.  So the first 13 are season one, the next 13, season 2, etc. Kc4 18:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: season discrepancy
Talk:Battle of Cremona (200 BC)

message: There is nothing in the text of this entry that mentions the city of Cremona.  Is it intended to discuss the sack of Cremona in CE 69 (described by Tacitus), or some other battle that is better known by another name?
Refer also to Timeline of Cremona, which does not mention this battle. 124.171.97.22 (talk) 08:06, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right heading, wrong story?
Talk:Greenock Blitz

message: I added a citation requirement for the claim that Greenock was the busiest port in the world (during WW2 I presume). The term 'busiest' needs to be defined- Highest numbers of ships visiting? Largest amount of cargo tonnage? Most passengers? Londonclanger (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "Busiest port in the world" claim
Talk:Battle of Nicaea

message: Wha about when the Ottomans conquered Nicaea? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.6.230.65 (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don kno mate! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.6.230.65 (talk) 02:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is another battle
Talk:Battle of Heartbreak Ridge

message: It seems like much of this article is not NPOV, and sounds a lot like a story and not so much an encyclopedia article.  If I'm right, much of what's on the page would need to be chopped up and rewritten much more concisely.  I can't, however, do this without coming to some sort of consensus with others on the problem areas.  I don't want to edit what I consider to be very interesting and good without at least being given the OK by someone who agrees that the language used is very much like a narrative. (Mythos721 17:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: npov

message: I wanted to point out that a lot of Chinese sources often use the name Battle of Heartbreak Ridge to label Battle of Triangle Hill. I saw this mistake often enough that a lot of Chinese actually believe Battle of Heartbreak Ridge is Battle of Triangle Hill. I added a note in the intro.
Jim101 (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese confusion about the name "Battle of Heartbreak Ridge" 

message: This is an unsourced. There are no citations. It could well be genuine, it also maybe a work of imagination. But was is clear is that it does not add anything to the battle's historiography..! And it made the section a little stupid when it contains the MoH citation.
.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.2.194 (talk) 14:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Frank Carr 

message: The section states:
Although the character in the film is a Marine, the real battle was fought by US Army troops. 
I quote from the movie:
"We were with the 23rd Infantry ... we joined The Corps later."
So the movie in fact makes it clear that the Heartbreak Ridge action was US Army, and not Marines.
Someone more comfortable with editing might want to correct that section if deemed necessary. 180.150.36.203 (talk) 07:39, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible correction to In Popular Culture
Talk:Siege of Cyzicus

message: I've changed the dates according to the source given, haven't changed the article name; verify please and either change the article name or add other sources.--Felis domestica (talk) 09:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty safe to say, given the war didn't start til 73. — LlywelynII 15:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:Battle of Bathys Ryax

message: The article states: "At the ensuing engagement, [Chrysocheir] was mortally wounded by Poulades, a Byzantine soldier who had been formerly a captive of the Paulicians. He was then captured and beheaded."  Hunh?  One is mortally wounded if one later dies of that wound, but here, he (apparently) died of the beheading.  Was the first wound only serious, not mortal?  Would it have been mortal had he been allowed to live a little longer?  Did he die of the first wound, and then the Byzantines beheaded the corpse?  This needs clarification.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he was wounded in the armpits, and thrown from his horse. From what I can make out from the original sources, he is described as "dying". Anyhow, I will rephrase this. Nice catch! Constantine   ✍  13:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortally wounded? 
Talk:Jason Collier

message: Where's the source of the proposal to retire Jason Collier's number?  I may be wrong, but I didn't find anything that would suggest that.  It would be a nice gesture, but I'm kinda surprised they would do that. --Tubutler 05:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source?
Talk:Battle of Nahavand

message: The entire Persian army was 50,000 to 150,000 and they took the entire army to a battle? That seems very strange to me!  82.70.40.190
It may seem strange to you but this was in effect a Persian last stand so taking their full force in order to quell the Arabian threat seems a fair assumption to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.112.146 (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The name should be Battle of Nahavand, without the macron, which is how it's normally referred to in English.  The transcription with the macron (Nahāvand) should be inserted after the Arabic to clarify it, but it is not normally used in English. Languagehat (talk) 22:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:Battle of Erzincan

message: Per  A Global Chronology of Conflict, Volume Four, ed. Spencer C. Tucker, (ABC-CLIO, 2010), 1625;
*"On July 2 Russian general Nikolai Yudenich counterattacks and splits the Turkish Third Army at the communications center of Erzingjan(Erzincan), forcing the Turks to retreat. In this fighting the Turks sustain 34,000 casualties, about half of them prisoners."
Therefore, the other half of the casualties must have been 17,000 killed and wounded. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok understood, thanks. Beshogur (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties
Talk:Tornado outbreak of November 15, 2005

message: I was going to move this to Mid-November 2005 tornado outbreak, but the whole title sounds rather clumsy.  At the very least, the "mid-" is not necessary unless there's some other November 2005 tornado outbreak with an article.  There ought to be a place indicator somewhere in the title, I think.  Any suggestions? Tuf-Kat 05:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Two other November 05 outbreaks: Evansville Tornado of November 2005 and Iowa Tornado Outbreak of November 2005. NSLE (讨论+extra) 05:59, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Something denoting the effected places would be good, though narrowing that down will be somewhat imprecise. Perhaps Ohio-Tennessee Valley <Region?> Tornado Outbreak of November 2005? Evolauxia 08:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a pretty broad area affected; I created this page while the outbreak was in its early stages (there were 6 tornadoes when the page was created, now there are at least 33). It's difficult to narrow it down. I called it the "Mid-November" outbreak as it was on November 15th and it was thought that it could continue to the 16th (it didn't). CrazyC83 04:28, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All tornado infoboxes should have maximum windspeed removed; it is pseudoscientific and unencyclopedic. Evolauxia 23:13, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windspeed in infobox 

message: SPC reports are not confirmed tornadoes, those are preliminary reports. They shouldn't be under such a heading, and early in the article in the "news" phase when SPC reports are listed the preliminary nature should be noted. Evolauxia 03:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Confirmed" tornadoes 

message: I moved "Mid-November 2005 Tornado Outbreak" to "Mid-November 2005 tornado outbreak" to comply with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 23:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Guy Ropartz

message: Apparently there are six symphonies, not including the petite symphonie () Schissel-nonLop! 05:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Six Symphonies

message: This composer was known as « Guy Ropartz », which anyone may confirm by looking at fr.Wikipédia or websites that sell recordings of his music. It is extremely odd that this article is entitled by his baptismal name, which is not consistent with other articles on en.Wikipedia. Please change it to « Guy Ropartz », and make this a re-dirct to it. Merci! Thank you! Charvex (talk) 02:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change title of this article

message: The list of works did not mention his FIVE symphonies, so I have added this. 208.87.248.162 (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Symphonies
Talk:Itanic

message: Yeah, merge sounds good to me. The term 'Itanic' clearly gained widespread notoriety in the industry.  And let us not forget, this was supposed to be Intel's next big thing. They lavished billions on it. has to go down as one of the biggest screw ups in chip history. Timharwoodx 13:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - merge
Talk:Sandra Yeung Racco

message: I've wikified this article and removed a bunch of PoV stuff. pm_shef 06:12, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken even more out of the article.  This person does not warrant this kind of background information. 70.29.239.249 05:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

message: *As per agreement, this page and all other Vaughan Councillor pages have been redirected to Vaughan City Council -- pm_shef 00:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Samuel Andrews (chemist)

message: What was his background were did his family come from? Country, Ethnic group, Social Group, Profession, Wealth, Religion?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.168.243.40 (talk) 16:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Schwede66 18:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Samuel Andrews → Samuel Andrews (chemist) — There are already three articles about persons called Samuel Andrews on WP, and I'm about to add a fourth one to the list (a New Zealand politician). The subject of this article does not strike me as the primary topic (I might be wrong, but I don't get the impression from the start class article), and I thus propose that this page name be used for a disambiguation page, as per WP:DABNAME. Schwede66 06:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
And just before anybody gets confused, I proposed the move and later closed the move, but it wasn't me who moved the page itself without discussion. I've tidied up the incoming links, though, after it got moved. Schwede66 19:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Something that would be important would be to translate the article into Spanish, into Italian, to German (if it does not exist) and other languages in general. Thank you to the user reading this for taking the time to read this matter. Tonio01dec (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish translation
Talk:Ilesa

message: We need a separate article on the city, on the historical state, on the rulers collectively (this is where the list can go, or it can be given a separate page) and on each of the rulers individually. Gallador (talk) 10:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Articles Required

message: Ilesa/Ijesa /Ilesha ?
They seem to be used interchangably and inconsistantly.  Can we standardize? RJFJR 18:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of consistency
Talk:Soy protein

message: This once was a core 'vegetarian' topic, but the informed discussion seems to have moved soy protein out of the center of most vegetarian nutritional discussions (among relevantly-informed persons) - to the periphery, since it is no longer the key ingredient in plantmilks or plant-based meats.  I wonder how the 'importance' tag should be set on the WikiProject vegan and vegetarian where 'cultural morphing' is evidence in food choices that are formally vegan but no longer reliant upon the same plant sources as they once seemed to be. MaynardClark (talk) 13:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Your question identifies a topic we don't have in the article - market size and commercial comparisons with other sources of plant protein. This is partially covered in the article on plant milks where the different plant sources for beverages are compared in the graphs on greenhouse gas emissions, water footprint, and land use where - when taken together - such indices are favorable for soy as a nutritious, relatively inexpensive, widely planted crop, and universally favored source of protein worldwide. From a cursory Google search, this 2019 market analysis indicates that soy production and uses in manufactured foods are growing, and likely to remain a nutritionally important source of plant protein with commercial relevance for many years to come. Zefr (talk) 14:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Traditional values

message: Several of the articles that linked to this I think are actually better served by this then the redirect to Family values. The best example being the Red Lake Indian Reservation link. Other examples are that Chopin's novel was written before the buzzword "family values" and William A Donohue likely does mean this. In cases where Family values was more appropriate I've fixed it where the articles use of "traditional values" links to the "Family Values" article directly.--T. Anthony 06:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The "Usage" section contains a statement that amounts to saying that aesthetic values are inherently subjective, which sounds like POV (as there is sound argument to the contary, whilst the idea of not questioning another's taste is a perculialy modern and western Individualist notion). CoyoteUK (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage 

message: Is reproductive success of logic-ignoring humans logical or illogical? Do logicians or even wikipedians set rules for cultural systems or parents?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.25.162.202 (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  fallacy of logic