lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Kenneally

message: I've just blanked two obituaries as copyright violations. The first had this attached
<TD ALIGN="RIGHT" VALIGN="TOP"> <BR>Thu 28 September 2000 <BR>Reproduced with permission </TD>
but I reckeon that was from the origional html page, and therefore not aplicable to the wikipedia. If you know otherwise, feel free to bring the obituary from the page history. SeventyThree(Talk) 18:17, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio obituaties 

message: The following is stated in MOSQUOTE:
:"Unless there is a good reason to do so, Wikipedia avoids linking from within quotes, which may clutter the quotation, violate the principle of leaving quotations unchanged, and mislead or confuse the reader." 
Most English-speaking people know what the Commonwealth is and where the British Isles are so there is not much point in linking to them. The links to Lieutenant-Commander Esmonde and Captain Fegen don't violate the Wiki-principle and are a more elegant way of linking to their pages than the additional sentence at the end. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 11:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS policy wonk checking in here.  Do the links to the others mentioned to the quote add any thing?  I would state that if they don't warrant any additional mention in the article (did they work with the subject of this article, or are they somehow related?) then they don't warrant linking.  On a seperate, but related topic, the bolding of the subject's name in the quote is inappropriate.  Per WP:BOLD italics should be used to indicate emphasis, and if you are italicizing within a quote (which is generally frowned upon, but I think is warranted in this situation), you should add "(emphasis added)" after the quote.  Livitup (talk) 13:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The justification for reversing my fix, as supplied by Unknown Unknowns, appears to be a misinterpretation of policy. I have since asked for clarification (see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Links in quotations), and the expert view is that it was correct to remove all links from within the quotation. I have therefore reinstated the fix I did. I suggest that this should not be reverted again, but that if there is a need, the matter should be discussed further in the section of the MoS I have just given.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great to this outsider's eyes!  Livitup (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links in quotation
Talk:Valerie Huttle

message: Why is this here?
:Where should it be? Alansohn 18:44, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Valerie Huttle is known to some, if not to most; this isn't a vanity page. She is an Assemblywoman in the New Jersey State Assembly, and there was enough information available for an article to be written about her. That's plenty enough reason, I think. - Cuivienen 21:16, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arnold Cipher

message: Could someone please link this page to 'Ottendorf Cipher' so that if anyone searches Ottendorf Cipher they get redirected to here?
I don't suppose you could provide a source that it really was called the "Ottendorf Cipher"? I've heard that name mentioned in the film National Treasure, and I'm slightly concerned we might be mixing fact with fiction here (see also Dan Brown's confused "Caesar Box"). — Matt Crypto 20:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Talk:Churcher's College

message: refs required Victuallers 23:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The School's motto is the Latin 'Credita Caelo', anyone know the meaning? Grunners 13:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Motto

message: Anonymous users keep adding this to external links, however it seems irrelevant. The 'about' page on their site is blank so I can't ascertain whether there are any links to the school. Even if it were run by students, but independently of the school, does it merit inclusion? Grunners (talk) 13:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RiderBack Radio

message: The page is currently incorrect, the previous edition was correct and people keep changing it back because they believe the article to be vandalised for some odd reason, I even included a reference, which can be found at: http://www.churcherscollege.com/the-college/?Fees-Bursaries-and-Scholarships
Please DO NOT REVERT CHANGES.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.11.93.44 (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: Have removed some people who cannot be linked within Wikipedia through either their own name or the organisation associated with them. Others could be removed, but I think they're probably significant enough to stay. Don't feel THAT strongly about it so happy to go with the flow. Tony Holkham (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people 

message: This article has only 3 citations, and one of those (the fees) seems to be defunct. I'll see if I can find some. Tony Holkham (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links (not) 

message: I reverted some considerable good faith edits; sources are already needed for existing information, let alone new information. The user who made the edits may be an employee of the College; if so, they need to declare it per WP:COI. Tony Holkham (Talk) 14:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  User LizLong84
Talk:Bill Campbell (business executive)

message: I'm not sure that "(CEO") is the right thing to add to the end of this article title: In :Category:Apple_employees, Bill comes up as "Bill Campbell (CEO)", which is kinda strange, since he has never been the CEO of Apple Compuer. Any ideas how to solve this? Peter S. 18:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't his common name Bill Campbell? DFlhb (talk) 10:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:Cassander

message: Where do we get the assertion that Nicanor is Cassander's brother? 
And WHICH Nicanor? (The disambiguation page is pretty ambiguous.) A Google search provides no support for the notion that Nicanor and Cassander are related, so I'm removing the assertion.
Though if any later editor finds evidence to the contrary, please feel free to disagree!
----
Uh, we're told within the space of a few lines that Cassander was Antipater's eldest brother, and then it's implied that he was A's son. (Which, IIRC, he was) Some confusion, I suspect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.206.225.35 (talk • contribs).
----
Diodoros calls him Κάσανδρος (with two sigma total, rather than three). Any idea why? 130.195.124.56 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Ancient Greece

message: Fellow Wikipedians,
I have added a decent amount of material or edited for clarity every section of the article. The new material is focused on supplying more information about Cassander's rule of Macedon with regard to his building policies and assumption of power, with mention of his attempted expansion into Illyria and how his legacy may have been shaped by his rivalries with other Diodochi, as well as more explicit references to which ancient and classical sources provided information on Cassander's motives. My edit was automatically flagged for using Wikipedia as a source, which I am rather certain I did not do (I linked to other pages in Wikipedia, but did not source the sentences containing the links from those pages), but if someone finds that I am in error about this, I would love to know. Revengemin Button (talk) 01:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions as part of the Wiki Education Assignment
Talk:William Falconer (poet)

message: The French Wikipedia is looking for some piece of information about another Scottish poet who died in the Indian Ocean and was called William Falconer. He was Auguste Lacaussade's friend. He died in 1852 and is buried in Salazie, on Réunion island. Please react here. Thierry Caro 18:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hans Werner Henze

message: Added some particulars about his political beliefs. Also explained why his librettist was arrested at the Hamburg premiere of the Che Guevara requiem. The article still needs some fleshing out. The reference at the end is a good source for additional information. Dtaw2001 18:42, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Added

message: Shouldn't the introduction talk more about his music then his political beliefs? - 72.9.27.26 (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. While Henze has been extremely political, including effectively inciting a riot at one of his performances in Germany, he has spent his adult life totally immersed in music. His amazing output is possibly unequalled in sheer volume by any other 20th C. composer. The list of political tidbits in the intro to this article make the article sound tendentious. Having just read the impressive Hindemith, Hartmann and Henze by Guy Richards (Phaedon Press, 1995, ) and this interesting and moving interview with the living composer, I hope to find time to do some editing on the uneven quality of Henze's Wikipedia entry. JacquesDelaguerre (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did a little work on the intro. Hope it helps. JacquesDelaguerre (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a pretty nice article; it has a few problems that I describe in my review on the comments page.  Questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Freedom Charter

message: Quote: Arguably, when the ANC came to power in May 1994, the new Constitution of South Africa was based on this document...
Arguably is the first weasel word I spotted, but would ... be included too? Also there appears to be a bit of spam on the talk page Talk User:Fissionfox 10:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Where does it say that in the article anyway? --196.2.126.175 (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel Words 

message: Is the original source of the Freedom Charter a free document to be translated? Or does translating it constitute copyright violation? Albmont (talk) 12:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Freedom Charter free to translate? 

message: The South African Police entry appears twice - the template is "protected" so cannot be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.191.175 (talk) 10:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dup entry
Talk:CGMS-A

message: CGMS-D is functionally identical to CGMS-A, and maintained by the same organization.  Conformance to them is required by DTCP ("5C") (which was recently accepted by cablelabs as a recognized interchange standard.  So even if broadcast flags aren't recognized, no one will be able to buy a CE box that doesn't obey CGMS-D flags, because otherwise they would loose their DTCP status and DTCP devices would stop talking to them.
Anyway, CGMS is not on the way out due to the digital transition- it is like the monster in the B-Movie that jumps up again with a new life as CGMS-D.
Anyway- maybe the article needs to be generalized to CGMS and sections be put in for analog versus digital.  -Mak 18:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a CGMS-D
Talk:Spaewife

message: From Talk:Spey-wife:
This page has been previously nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Spae Wife for the result.
JYolkowski // talk 21:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I think that this entry should be merged into an entry on Spae. This even could be merged into the closely related and over-lapping Seid, renaming the entry Seid and spae... - WeniWidiWiki 20:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As spae (to look into the future) is simply an aspect of seid, I think spae should be redirected to the seid article and the practice treated there, while spaewife is merged into Völva.--Berig 22:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Sounds good to me, too. Spae-wife isn't an Old Norse term, by the way, but a Scots equivalent. (Not sure if the word "spae" is in common use in Scots, it still is in Scandinavian.) 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 19:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spae
Talk:Pennacook

message: This so called group of indians were once a Nation of New Hampshire and took a big part in New Hampshire, but you people haven't the decentsie to put them down as a tribe of New Hampshire and I'm standing up for my tribe. My name is Kunnaway and I'm a Pennacook and live in NH. 65.175.170.6 18:20, November 3, 2005 (UTC)
Would this article be an appropriate place to include a list of places named after the Pennacook?  I know of two places in Maine that have adopted the name including a school and an art gallery http://mainearts.maine.gov/news/newsletter/2004-3/rumford.shtml  This is my first Wikipedia editing experience and I thought I'd start with something local.  --Jbailey8 23:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The map and the article don't seem to match.  The Pennacook being down along the Merrimack in Massachusetts (for example, the Pawtucket Falls in Lowell) is discussed but not shown.  Why is this?  Thanks, CSZero (talk) 22:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Any idea? I still believe that the maps should color the Merrimack Valley in Massachusetts as well. Looking at the map on the Massachusett page, this area is currently a no-man's land. CSZero (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration 

message: My name is Adam Swift, and I am writing a school report, and to tell the truth, this article could have tons more information, such as details of Pennacook involvement in King Philip's War, and where exactly they fled afterwards. I would be most obliged if the author of this article could expand upon the subject.--199.180.165.38 (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Information! 

message: They're not the same tribe, it makes no sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.195.159 (talk) 21:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question! There's no article for them yet. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to see that the article for the Pawtucket tribe was created on 12 October 2021. Ken Gallager (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does the Pawtucket Tribe Redirect Here?
Talk:Ex-Haredim

message: "the ones who leaves their religion"
I think that if they are plural ("ones") they should "leave" and not "leaves".
But I'm not sure.--132.68.1.29 14:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct in English? 

message: I'm not familiar with the expression, but isn't an anachronism to use a modern Israeli term to describe a Talmudic rabbi, a 17th century philosopher, and two giants of Yiddish literature who both died before the British Mandate of Palestine? Are there no famous contemporary Jews who are referred to as yotz'im bish'ela? — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 05:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed the title of this article is inappropriate, not being English nor a well-known phrase used in English. Can someone please come up with an English title for this aricle? --Redaktor (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous ''yotz'im bish'ela'' 

message: I propose that this page be merged with the article called off the derech. Yetzia bish'eila is the Hebrew term, while off the derech is more commonly used in English to refer to the same issue.
All the content can be preserved, but moved into the other article. 
Openedknowledge (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: AgreeCaseeart (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

text: Agree as well OTDQueen   —Preceding undated comment added 21:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

text: I agree with this, it looks like the same phenomenon is being referred to here.--Pharos (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Off the derech article
Talk:Enteroctopus

message: I thought I would make a brief note on why I limited the listed species to the ones that I did.  First off, I excluded E. membranaceus because in order for the genus Enteroctopus to be valid, E. membranaceus must be , and is held as the junior synonym to E. megalocyathus as explained in the artcile. Additionally, while I am not sure about wikipedia standards on the subject, it doesn't seem that it is appropriate to make a page for invalid names.  I also did not include E. juttingi.  The taxonomic authority is cited as Robson, 1929 in CephBase, and as Hochberg was using this reference as a major source when ressurecting the genus, and did not feel it fit to include E. juttingi in the genus at that time, it seems that is behooved me not to include it either.  I know that E. juttingi is listed in the Current Classification of Recent Cephalopoda (2001), but this is not a detailed review of status in itself. Additionally, Norman and Hochberg (2005) in their review of octopus taxonomy still did not include E. juttingi in their schema of Enteroctopus.  Until such time that the species is review and placed into the genus, I feel it should not be included in the article.  Taollan82 (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Species 

message: So how large is a "giant octopus"? Are we talking a length of several feet? Great weight? Or are the dimensions all relative? -- llywrch (talk) 19:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size?
Talk:Forwarder

message: The last sentence reads, "In North American style full tree operations are the equivalent tasks done by skidders." It's hard to make sense out of this sentence. The easiest way to make the sentence work would be to move the word "are" and add an en dash, a hyphen, and a comma. Here's what I mean:
:In North American–style full-tree operations, the equivalent tasks are done by skidders.
This sentence makes more sense, but I'm not certain that it means what the author intended. I'll wait a little while and see if someone else (who knows this subject) weighs in. If not, I'll go ahead and make the change. CKA3KA (Skazka) 19:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Giant cuttlefish

message: Content may be considered relevant to this page: http://www.whyallanewsonline.com.au/story/3672688/whyalla-close-to-the-heart-of-cuttlefish-country/?cs=1550 --Danimations (talk) 04:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary film about Sepia apama
Talk:Middlesex County Automobile Club

message: Hi. Yesterday I created a Wikipedia page under the title 'Middlesex County Automobile Club'.  However, the article has been deleted and I have received a message reffering to possible infingement of copyright with the webpage http://www.mcac.co.uk/history.
I appreciate your concerns and can confirm that the article is certainly a copy of the webpage that you have referred to.  However, as a Director and Webmaster of Middlesex County Automobile Club Ltd I can (and do) authorise use of the text on the Wikipedia page.  
I do appreciate that I may have gone about this the wrong way but I would like to get the page reinstated as soon as possible.  Your advice would be appreciated.
Many thanks
Joroma
Malc Farmer
malcf@mcac.co.uk
Middlesex County Automobile Club Ltd
Revised version of page uploaded Joroma 20:15, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted
Talk:List of free file formats

message: *Does PNG fit here?
*Does DjVu fit here?
*Does Musepack (MPC) fit here?
*Does CSV fit here?
*Does Rich Text Format (RTF) developed by Microsoft, fit here?
*Does XPM fit here?
*Does MD3 fit here?
*Does MD5 fit here?
*Does BSP fit here?
*Does PAK fit here?
*Does OBJ fit here?
*Does ODT fit here?
*Does XLS fit here?
*Does DDS fit here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.89.228 (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other free file formats? 

message: PDF says it is proprietary. 24.210.73.62 21:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am confused, the article says that it is a "proprietary file format" and then it says "PDF is also an open standard in the sense that anyone may create applications that read and write PDF files without having to pay royalties to Adobe Systems." hmm.. -- Frap 08:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PDF

message: Patents for GIF are now expired. Can we treat it as 'free format'? JRS.pl 08:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GIF

message: Besides a Comparison_of_audio_codecs, the same should be done aswell for the archiving formats, compression formats, video formats, ... and this all for their own category (lossless; lossy, ...). Please make the appropriate articles.
Thanks,
13:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparisation of ...-formats articles 

message: Mostly missing reliable references.--Kozuch (talk) 11:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.  The reference to the LINFO page doesn't qualify as a reliable reference either - LINFO is a project of the Bellevue Linux Users Group, not an independent and widely recognized standards body or news source.  I haven't seen any widely acceptable definition for this sort of thing and I've been involved for decades.   The analogy with software doesn't fly.  And RTF is not free or open in any reasonable sense that I know of - it is a Microsoft publication copyrighted with "all rights reserved" and says that they may have patents etc.  --NealMcB (talk) 03:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: Open format is no longer an original research (the article contains three authoritative definitions which include the more clearly defined open standard definitions), while these article lacks sources. I think that we can now merge the articles. --Nemo 06:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open formats merge
Talk:Conspiracy theory/Archive 6

message: the article says the following about Watergate, is this accurate: " but which only existed as a series of initially-unbelieveable allegations in newspaper reports for several years".  When it first came out I didn't find it "unbelievable".  It was reported by many of the major news organizations.  It wasn't unbelievable in the way the moon landing conspiracy theory is unbelievable.  I don't ever remember Watergate   being called a conspiracy theory.  Bubba73 (talk) 01:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watergate
Talk:Mike Jerrick

message: Changed and combined first and second paragraphs to indicate current assignment.  Previous information was out of date.  Could use help with the wording so that it matches other articles stylistically; I'm new at this.  solargroovy 19:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: reference for the above edit was from:  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,64563,00.html  solargroovy 19:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled