Talk:Roger Rogerson

message: Category was recently changed from :Category:Australian criminals to :Category:Australian drug traffickers. Has Rogerson been verified as a drug trafficker? The article notes a 1985 conviction for conspiring to supply heroin, but also notes that this was overturned on appeal; none of the other convictions mentioned are for drug trafficking. Unless he has a standing conviction for something in this line, I'm inclined to change back to the broader category. --Calair 02:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Drug trafficker category?

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Roger Rogerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110526125557/http://www.sundaytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,9353,18274297-28778,00.html to http://www.sundaytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,9353,18274297-28778,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Roger Rogerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110323161012/http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/01%2F375+Roger+Rogerson+convicted+on+ASIC+charges?opendocument to http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/01%2F375+Roger+Rogerson+convicted+on+ASIC+charges?opendocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Roger Rogerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130922062418/http://lorikeet.and.com.au/t2/t2.htm to http://lorikeet.and.com.au/t2/t2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There have been some back-and-forth reverts in the past week or so about whether to use the adjective "disgraced" in the introduction. It's probably time to open a discussion here in an effort to reach some sort of consensus and prevent accusations of edit warring. (For my own part, I was initially opposed to the use of "disgraced" as I thought it was redundant, given that Rogerson's murder conviction was mentioned in the same sentence. However, I've since changed my mind - he could fairly be described as disgraced even prior to the murder, due to having already been found guilty of perverting the course of justice.) Alerting fellow contributors ,  and . Thanks, Meticulo (talk) 10:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: "Disgraced"?

message: What was the outcome of his 2020 appeal? I was unable to find a source online. Meticulo (talk) 02:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeal outcome