lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bradford Factor

message: To be exact, the information on wikipedia was an extract from the site bradfordfactorcalculator.com. The cut and paste job was from the site as a resource, at some point someone removed that URL as the reference.
The supporting information, absence management forms and other material are not published on wikipedia. Wikipedia summarises the topic, it does not provide free strategic and operational information and management forms and tools which support the effective implementation and use of the Bradford factor. I suggest you review the resource properly and do your homework before removing useful assets which add value for individuals looking to use the Bradford Index in a practical manner in their workplaces.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.57.159 (talk) 08:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Utter rubbish the Wikipedia article is sourced from citations the website is if anything just a poor crib as any person familiar with the subject can see. Move on please. Tmol42 (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref Edit 16 Oct 2014

message: I have again reverted an edit that has qualified that the BF only applies to uncertificated absenses and has also added a non encyclopaedic edit to this effect in brackets. This is incorrect as the formula to work it needs to measure all absences regardless of status. So far there has been no explanation offered so once again I have reverted and suggested editor comes her to discuss. Tmol42 (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The help message for the user in question which you have entered would be a good start for him to understand WP. As I personally feel he is not aware of the basic editing policies of WP. I had done a revert for the conversational kind of text he had put on the same page. Amit (talk) 01:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certification
Talk:P110α

message: Would it be better (or even possible in WP) to rename this P110α to p110α ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should article name start with lowercase p 

message: Google Scholar search for PIK3CA: 69k hits.
Google Scholar search for P110α: 14k hits.
Go for the common not the rare name.
— J.S.talk 20:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should use the standard name for this gene, i.e. PIK3CA not P110a (see Homologene)
Talk:Parathyroid chief cell

message: I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username: LTEMESV) at Clemson University (Clemson, SC, USA).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atarasidis (talk • contribs) 16:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clemson University BIOL H4610
Talk:Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians

message: I have changed the info which was not correct. PPPP is simply the elctoral name of the Pakistan Peoples Party. I think this article should be merged with the Pakistan Peoples Party page. HO  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haris Obaid (talk • contribs) 05:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed 
Talk:Pathogenicity island

message: I would dispute the comment:
"3. They are high in Guanine + Cytosine content, meaning more G+C base pairs than A+T."
I have lecture handouts written by a Professor of Molecualr Biology at Edinburgh University that explicitly show the G+C content of a pathogenicity island (PAI) at lower than 50%, although I have no Journal reference.  As an element that is frequently horizontally transferred, would it be better just to say that a feature of PAIs is that they have a different %G+C content?  Have I missed something  important (please tell me Iàve got an exam in a few days!LOL)  I would suggest that more research needs to be done.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.68.31 (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C+C content
Talk:Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan

message: the party JUP was not founded by allama shah ahmed noorani it was founded by hazrat khwaja qamar ud Din sialvi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.148.64.17 (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  some correction 
Talk:Phosphatidylinositol

message: The IUPAC name shown is for 20:4/18:0-PI, which is one of many that can exist.  Also the 20:4 is depicted in the omega-3 form, rather than the more common and abundant omega-6 form. 158.111.236.75 (talk) 19:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2000 United States House of Representatives elections

message: The map showing specific pickups is a mess. It's using districts that were created in 2001-2002  (based on the 2000 census) instead of the appropriate districts that existed in 2000 and apportioned based on the 1990 census.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.4.80.30 (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: North Carolina should be this:  http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/GALLERY/5422_19_06_13_2_03_31.png
Plus I would like it known that this map, and the outline for the previous map came from here: http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=137677.950.
I admit, I am not fully up to speed on the copy write laws, but I would like some credit if it is at all possible.  Thanks.
-Fuzzybf (aka Fuzzybigfoot of the Atlas Forum)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzybf (talk • contribs) 06:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Carolina map is wrong, plus it was mine
Talk:Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate

message: When written as PIP2, how is it usually pronounced?  Does it sound like "Pee Eye Pee Two" or "Pihp Two" or "Pipe Two" or what?  Thank you — 192.35.44.24 (talk) 12:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: r  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.216.73.17 (talk) 17:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  social studies
Talk:Photoreactivation

message: YO! When you say "our", I assume you are refering to humans... Well, humans, and most mammals for that matter don't have PRE -- this is dark repair and it is characteristic of bacteria. If I wasnt studying for a test right now, I would fix this blatant error.
Caddymob  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 06:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pin1

message: How could I insert an info box? Or is it done by automatically by a bot? Magnum1 (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box 

message: I think this page should be merged with PIN1 page (they are about the same protein).
Absolutely yes..they ARE the same protein  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacopopitaciu (talk • contribs) 21:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Solva

message: Also created a Solva Page Solva and linked Solfach maybe worth a merge GarethRees 22:39 16 Feb 2007 (GMT)
* done. Agathoclea 23:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Walter Jenkins

message: Al Weisel wrote an article about Jenkins and LBJ that incldues some interesting material but is often vague about sources. I intend to use some material that Weisel says comes from the FBI's interview with Jenkins. But some material is unsourced, so I hesitate to use the details. I wonder if anyone can confirm them from other sources that do not rely on Weisel. It reads like the sources are oral histories. Here are excerpts:
:[Joseph] Califano says, "I heard Johnson say often that when he left the White House there were two things he was going to do: He was going to start smoking again, and he was going to throw his arms around Walter Jenkins and hug him. And he did it. He started smoking on the plane on the way back, and he met Walter Jenkins at the airport in Texas." Until his death in 1973, just days before the Paris peace accords ended America's involvement in the Vietnam War, Johnson never again turned his back on his old friend. Jenkins was a frequent guest at the LBJ ranch, where the former president spent the last years of his life, presiding over meetings of ranch hands instead of cabinet officers.
:One day at the ranch, [Liz] Carpenter [press secretary to the First Lady] recalls, the retired president was relaxing with a group of friends, including Jenkins. Oddly, he had begun to look like the hippies whose protests against the war had driven him out of office, letting his white hair grow long until it curled down to his shoulders. The burdens of office lifted, he seemed momentarily at peace. "It's worth being out of office," Johnson remarked, "to have Walter back with us."
Source: LBJ's Gay Sex Scandal, Out, December 1999, 76-131
Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking sources
Talk:Piwi-interacting RNA

message: The top paragraph says the oligonucleotides are between 29-30 nucleotides, while the second section says they are 26-31 nucleotides. So which is correct?
----
It seems piRNA are also found in fruit flies, time to remove the "uniquely mammalian" phrase?
Address : <http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-10/yu-sdt102507.php>
Scientists discover tiny RNAs play a big role in controlling genes
In this study Lin and his Ph.D. student, Hang Yin, discovered more than 13,000 Piwi-associated piRNAs in fruit flies. One particular piRNA, they found, forms a complex with the protein known as Piwi, which then binds to chromatin, a strategic region in the genome that regulates the activity of the gene. Chromatin’s role is to package DNA so that it will fit into the cell, to strengthen the DNA to allow cell division, and to serve as a mechanism to control gene expression.
“This is important in maintaining self-renewal of stem cells,” Lin said. “These small RNAs might provide new tools to harness the behavior of stem cells and other biological processes related to diseases.”
“This finding revealed a surprisingly important role for piRNAs, as well as junk DNA, in stem cell division,” Lin said. “It calls upon biologists to look for answers beyond the one percent of the genome with protein coding capacity to the vast land of junk DNA, which constitutes 99 percent of the genome.”
Nature: Advance Online Publication doi:10.1038/nature06263
--Meika 21:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1986 United States House of Representatives elections

message: I went through the FEC results and verified that Chuck Norris is the Dem candidate's real name. Can anyone verify if this if he is related to the Chuck Norris who ran in the 1st district in 2016? Longestview (talk) 16:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chuck Norris in CO-6
Talk:Platelet-activating factor

message: NEJM JFW | T@lk 08:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in anaphylaxis 

message: between platelet dysfunction and "asthma"? 184.148.107.107 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  is there a connection
Talk:Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami

message: From what I can surmise, HUJI and HUJI-B are two separate, but related, groups.  This article does not seem to make the distinction.  The two groups may need their own respective articles. --RDavi404 (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HUJI vs HUJI-B
Talk:Irvington High School (New York)

message: I removed this from the article:
The editors of this page are two Irvington High School Students who have been assigned by the principal to administrate the page.  He has requested the 'bomb threats' section be removed.  We, as the editors, request that who is re-posting that section after we remove it to please stop.  Thank you.
The bomb threat material is of historical interest.  It can be rewritten to indicate that it's no longer curent, but it shouldn't be removed entirely.
Also, please note that your declaration indicates that you have a conflict of interest in regards to this page, since the interests of the principal of IHS, on whose behalf you are acting as agents, may not coincide with the interests of the encyclopedia. See WP:COI for more information on this.
I, personally, don't have a problem with students editing an article about the school they attent, but you should inform your principle that he has no more status here then any other editor, and no control over what appears on this page.  If you want to continue editing, I suggest you do so on your own behalf, and not under orders from someone else, but, given your declaration, your edits will presumably be under scrutiny (as indeed, almost all edits on Wikipedia are). 
I'll post this on your talk pages as well. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 02:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed material 

message: I have reworded the bomb threat material into something more neutral and historical, and also moved it down farther into the article.  I did this to deliberately reduce its promanence: bomb threats may be a historical fact that should not be deleted this near to when they occurred; but they are not the purpose of the school, and should not be given more than passing weight.
I would suggest the following additional steps should be taken:
# Check that my rewording is still factually accurate, and correct it if not.
# Add a statement about whether a bomb was ever found, or if the treats were all fakes.
# Find a reliable source for the bomb threats and cite it.  This was likely carried in the local paper or maybe local TV station.  There may be a web site with an article on it you can cite, or find an issue of the paper that carried the story and cite that.
Hope this helps. Loren.wilton (talk) 03:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reworded
Talk:Podocyte

message: So the article is about Podocytes, the figure title says 'Podocyte', but it's clearly a renal corpuscle.   Is there no better figure for a podocyte?  --98.70.62.167 (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure in article does not apply 

message: Small entry already referred to on podocyte page where it would be better presented Iztwoz (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Filtration slits]]
Talk:Polysome

message: Hi,good job regarding the edits you have made thus far.My only suggestion is that maybe you can add a diagram of polysomes.DEMO-E (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added few more information about the function of polysomes, how ribosomes contribute to the synthesis of polysome, also under the Structure subheading, I did add a small section about how structure of polysomes are elucidated from mouse brain, as well as how to distinguish the three different types of polysomes. I would like to make this article to be more details and visualizing, so my suggestions to make this article to be more perfect are to add one or more pictures of polysomes to visualize easily, and any other information about the detail structure of polysome when possible, as well as how polysomes are studied differently among species.Vannguyenn (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: I have undertaken preliminary work to improve the quality of the writing on this page to increase its legibility and comprehensibility. However, further work ought to be undertaken, preferably by a specialist in the field, to both expand and improve this page.
Stuart Black (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of Writing 

message: I copyedited the article and fixed small grammatical mistakes such as misplaced commas and agreements. There is only one in-text citaton in the text, but several references listed at the bottom of the page. The citations are not placed after their corresponding information, making it difficult to verify the sources. This will require a rewrite, being as that many of the sources listed are textbooks and not accessible online for the general public.
Gonzalezmg1 (talk) 02:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit and Reference Verification

message: The illustration seems to indicate that ribosomes bind to strands of DNA. They don't. There is no DNA in the cytoplasm (barring infection with a virus or something) and no ribosomes are present in the nucleus. In any case, ribosomes don't bind to DNA. What is this illustration meant to convey? It can't be relative size, because you can't see the ends of the DNA molecule. IAmNitpicking (talk) 12:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNA?
Talk:Chief of the Army Staff (Pakistan)

message: I have added an entry for Gen. Ziauddin, who was appointed by Nawaz Sharif to replace Pervez Musharraf, but could not take office because a military coup ensued.
--iFaqeer (talk) 01:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He never was officially appointed for this post. SMS  Talk 09:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gen. [[Ziauddin Butt]] 

message: I want to bring attention to the concerning issue of persistent vandalism and disruption. The page has been subjected to frequent instances of edits and disruptive behavior, compromising the integrity of the information presented.
 
Despite efforts to revert these edits and maintain the accuracy, the frequency and severity of vandalism have escalated, necessitating stronger measures to ensure its protection. As such, I request that the Wikipedia page be placed under protection lock to prevent further modifications. Atif ahmad8 (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for page protection.
Talk:Pre-replication complex

message: I moved the following sentence from the bottom of the article to the introductory paragraph: "The proteins involved in the pre-RC are essential for DNA replication."  I thought it fit better in the introductory paragraph rather than orphaned at the bottom of the article.  At the bottom of the article, it was technically in the section on eukaryotes, but it seemed to apply to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, so I thought moving it to the top was OK.  If in fact it doesn't apply to prokaryotes, please move it back to the section on eukaryotes.  Thanks! — WakingLili (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-RC proteins essential for DNA synthesis 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jellyfish829 (talk) 11:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics
Talk:Jehangir Karamat

message: It is a lesser known fact that Jehangir Karamat was a Punjabi originally, although there is no proof for him being a Pashtun.
In that case ask a native Pashtun what does the Kakazai tribe mean, they will reply it is not a Pashtun tribe.
I hope you guys understand.
NameIsShaheer (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jehangir Karamat was a Punjabi
Talk:Akhtar Abdur Rahman

message: There is a lot of information presented here to be found in only one source. More sources should be added to verify the large amount of content within. --RichardMills65 (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 
Talk:Gas leak

message: Maybe a section sould be added about how known gas leaks are fixed and homes made safe from explosions. --Ncusa367 21:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I'm curious whether anyone has an idea about what proportion of gas
is leaked from pipe networks all the way from the wellhead to the
customer's house. It would be very interesting to have some reliable
information about this. Thomas.Hedden (talk) 16:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Leakage rates

message: why helium tests instead of air?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.110.31.4 (talk) 01:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  helium deectors for underground natural gas leaks 

message: Hello fellow wikipedians,
I want to know if the section "leak grades" is necessary as it is only about the US standards, and may be different in many other countries. I believe it can be replaced by a single link to the source page, instead of a detailed section. The other sections such as "Massachusetts" also take the US views, which needs to be changed RandomBro (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this US-specific system is too long for an article that theoretically is meant to cover the entire world. It should either be shortened, or corresponding descriptions for other countries/regions should be added.IAmNitpicking (talk) 01:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leak grades
Talk:Random amplification of polymorphic DNA

message: Is RAPD-Marcus Gunn pupil more notable than the PCR technique? If so, perhaps that should be the land page for the abbreviation? Or perhaps this should just go to disambig?--Xris0 (talk) 15:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability vs. pupil defect?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 21:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: RAPD →  – For WP:NATURAL disambiguation from  (also known as ), which gets about twice as many page views and is currently the subject of another RM submitted by me. Also note that sometimes Wikipedia seems to prefer to use spelled-out terms rather than abbreviations even when there is no disambiguation issue, such as for  and . Also please note the similar comment on this Talk page from 2012. — BarrelProof (talk) 20:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 November 2020
Talk:RNA-induced silencing complex

message: It is a bit silly that this article on the RISC complex doesn't cite the Nobel Prize winners who discovered it...the seminal papers of Mello and Fire MUST be added here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesotho (talk • contribs) 13:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References need upgrading.... 
Talk:ROMK

message: Some more detail on how these receptors fit into renal physiology would be nice - including how the channel(s) located in the collecting tubes can be for secretion, when these channels are "inward rectifying"(?).  It seems to be a good article so far.  lifeform (talk) 08:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail

message: Whoever rated this article "low importance", would you agree to have all your ROMK's magically disappeared for the rest of your life?  lifeform (talk) 08:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Low importance"
Talk:Guam at the 1988 Winter Olympics

message: How do you vote to delete a page that isn't worth it?
:First, you must add the template CfD (surrounded by the usual double {{}}), then say why on the talk page (here). However, this page is worth it. If you want to get rid of it because it is a stub, then get to adding those templates, as there are a quite a few stubs on Wikipedia. Geo 21:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Receptor potential

message: Some of the additional sources that can be used for this article are Vander's Human Physiology, 14th ed., Biochemistry, A Short Course, 2nd ed., and Allosterism and Structure in Thermally Activated Transient Receptor Potential Channels--Cwelsh3 (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Restriction point

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Start point and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Start point until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Start point" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rhoptry

message: This should just be part of Apicomplexan cellular morphology.24.240.37.200 (talk) 23:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: — Assignment last updated by Ekrodge (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cell Biology Honors
Talk:Safranin

message: I think this article should be marked as a stub. Should I mark it?
Denny1213 (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't fit the criteria for a stub.  ChemNerd (talk) 13:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: It's mentioned here but not really defined. Equinox (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is phenosafranine?