lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ember

message: :What edit do you want to make? --ais523 15:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Defending AGAINST the "ember attack" is part of a bushfire defense strategy.  Also note that it is not defending bushfires, but defending AGAINST bushfires. Roidroid --- (talk) 11:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

message: It seems like a disambiguation page should be created, as the "see other" section at the top is quite a bit longer than it needs to be. It might be better replaced with just "For other uses, see Ember (disambiguation)" or something to that effect. Ideas? —烏Γ (kaw at me), 06:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: This article covers the same phenomenon as the Smouldering page. I don't see the value of having separate, less complete articles on the same thing. GBMorris (talk) 11:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, they are not the same thing (an ember is a material object, while smouldering is a process, and either can exist independent of other); therefore, if the two articles contain largely the same amount of material, then the articles need to be improved, not merged. Firejuggler86 (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Smouldering? 

message: Should the clarification that sparks are airborne embers occur earlier in the article? The image of a bushfire with "embers" flying off seems confusing without this context.
YellowBlack (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. (I've reworded the caption; it was improper usage anyway: sparks are not called embers. It would be like having a picture of a snow storm that's captioned "ice cubes falling from the sky").  ;) Firejuggler86 (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on "Sparks"
Talk:Microsphaera penicillata

message: Can't identify the mildew in the photograph (obviously) but the host doesn't look much like a sycamore to me. 69.232.155.240 (talk) 08:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect image? 
Talk:Shooting Star Children's Hospices

message: UK Children's hospices Claire House, Shooting Star, plus Martin House hospice all have pages in Wikipedia, so 'importance' should not be a reason for deletion. I would counter this notion by saying that palliative care for children with life-limiting conditions, and the hospice movement, are very important subjects to many people.
I intend to fix any formatting problems and properly reference any links (external or internal) if the page is allowed to stay!
thanks
:I agree. Not a deletable article. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 16:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hang on 

message: I've made some drastic changes to bring into line with our guidelines, policies and manual of style.  The article read much like a brochure and appeared to have been pretty much copy and pasted from bits of CHASE's own literature. As an encyclopedia we need to present a more measured neutral article to our readers and we may not use copyrighted material that does not conform to the GFDL in this manner. I also removed listings of things the charity does/has done and of its patrons that were not themselves particularly encyclopedic.  Again they read more like press release claims than an encyclopedia article.
The article as it currently stand also lacks any real indication of how the world sees it - no reliable third party reports that have taken a critical look at the institution.  This would be invaluable for fleshing it out and indicating its notability. -- SiobhanHansa 13:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bringing into line with our guidelines and style
Talk:Harlingen High School

message: The infobox has a blank for rivals. Someone put some info in it. I have confirmed it to be true. I support this edit.
rivals = San Benito High School
<ref>https://www.maxpreps.com/high-schools/harlingen-cardinals-(harlingen,tx)/football/rival.htm
NOTE: "The oldest rivalry in the Rio Grande Valley.... with Harlingen
High leading the series, 58-22-5 (2 play-off wins as well) but, San Benito"
Vanny089 (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rival school
Talk:Taylor Hall (ice hockey, born 1964)

message: Since the title is unambiguous, readers won't reach here by accident, and the hatnote is unneeded. See WP:NAMB. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I see the Other Taylor Hall has been moved, it used to be under Taylor Hall (ice hockey b. 1991), which should still be easy to keep the two straight but I figured it wouldn't hurt to have the hatnote at the top in case someone saw the words ice hockey in parentheses in the drop down of the search box and clicked on it bringing them here. If you think that it is unnecessary feel free to remove it and I will not replace it anymore.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnotes not needed
Template talk:Soyuz

message: Should we change the title to reflect the title of the main article - Soyuz programme? --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 15:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes we should. I've done so. Rillian (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 19:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Program" or "Programme"
Talk:Dayspring Bank

message: I see, 1st State Bank and First State Bank were both created today as duplicates.  I'll set up a redirect from 1st State Bank.  Never mind about the merge.Toddstreat1 15:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate

message: I've been adding information to this page and hope to find more to place on it. --Carl Spackler 18:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: How is the part stating references are needed taken off? Carl Spackler (talk) 21:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: https://fremonttribune.com/news/first-state-bank-trust-changes-name-to-rvr-bank/article_9ad046fc-00cf-11ee-8194-eb1fde04516a.html
Maybe we should update the article WiinterU (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bank changes name
Talk:Tex Terry

message: This page should be moved to Tex Terry since that is the name he is notable as, and how sources listed in the article list him as.Leofric1 (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Tex Terry

message: I am in the process of converting the filmography section to a wikitable. It appears to be an exhaustive list of his roles, and someone might consider pruning it a bit, removing the less notable roles. Leofric1 (talk) 18:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 
Talk:Structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain

message: I commented out a part of the proofs section because I felt a) it contained misleading statements and errors b) it was unclear.  I say unclear because I think it used terminology that is not readily found in Wikipedia.  Misleading statements include:
* "Hence, torsion free modules over PIDs are projective." (This is not true, you can find in Lam's Lectures on Modules and Rings that for any nonfield integral domain, the field of fractions is torsion free and nonprojective.)
* "If M is projective, so is a direct summand of a free module F = M + N." (The author does not seem to use this, and it is nonsensical.  Every summand of a free module is projective.)
* "If M is torsion, it is the quotient of a free module." (Every module is a quotient of a free module, it has nothing to do with torsion.)
What is commented out needs heavy editing if it is to be useful, or else be replaced altogether.  Rschwieb (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Proofs" section 

message: The example module is not free, so it has no basis. I think that what you are triying to say is that the module is the direct sum of the cyclic submodules generated by these elements. Tama moana (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Uniqueness" section 

message: I decided I'd try to finally learn a proof of this theorem, and was happy to find a proof section here. After following the link in the proof section to Smith normal form, I now understand why the decomposition exists. However, the proof section doesn't seem to concern itself with the uniqueness part, and the uniqueness section contains no proof. --Ørjan (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofs missing uniqueness
Talk:Spanish practices

message: I thought that "mañana" referred to lateness, or a lack of timekeeping. See this BBC article for more about what I mean.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 20:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timekeeping? 

message: Please Wikipedia, try not participate on spreading xenophobic or racist generic affirmation. We know all countries (but not all people) have expressions, bad thinkings, complexes,  grudges and prejudices about their neighbours.
So please try to spread knowledge and peace, no faked, grudges and misunderstandings between people. Be active on this as you can see the Ignorance is bold and seems to be more effective on been replicated than love and good understanding.
Spreading prejudices without a scientific basis is spreading hoaxes. Having references that others also suffered the same damage does not provide an ounce of truth, it only demonstrates the collection effort to reinforce the not good intention 2.139.95.168 (talk) 07:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenophobic when trying not to be racist
Talk:Alex Finlayson

message: Please do not remove the  tag until this page has been Wikified! Removing the tag takes it out of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikify action list and it is possible that no editor will be aware that improvement is still possible. Tasks still to be done are listed below. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 15:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Precisionist (horse)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support per nom -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:VAZ-2101

message: How can an automobile be any more or less important than another ?
History: Can any one add something to the history ? The Soviets bought the entire production line from FIAT but the tooling was shot and the Soviets ended up not paying FIAT for the deal as a result.
Any one got any thing on special Ladas ? The police cars ?
Lada trivia ? Plenty of Ladas in contemporary film and TV
What about all the Ladas which ended up at the bottom of the North Sea because Soviet merchant seamen would buy tow or three dud Ladas in foreign ports, then assemble one good one out of the parts on the way home, and dump the other two shells overboard. Fishermen used to hate them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Proph-Six (talk • contribs) 06:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is said that VAZ-21016 has 1,452 cc (89 cu in) engine from VAZ-21011 but VAZ-21011 has 1,294 cc (79 cu in) engine. VAZ-21016 info has been cited to book: Cars of the Soviet Union by Andy Thompson. --tapi0 (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Made correction to information after borrowing the book. --tapi0 (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information mismatch 

message: The main article is not clear why 2101 model was nicknamed kopeyka. The reason was that kopeyka essentially means 1 kopeck. When further models of the car were produced, they were nicknamed "dvoyka" or "number 2" (2102), "troyka" or "number three" (2103) up to "shesterka" (2106). Now, the corresponding name for number one would be "yedinitsa" but for the reasons which are not so easy to explain, a nickname "yedinitsa" would be really awkward for a car. So instead Russians called it "kopeyka" because kopeyka is "one kopeck" or another way to say "one".
Note that as far as I know, "kopeyka" is not used in any other case to mean "number one" except in this case.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.72.221.76 (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the nickname Kopeyka
Talk:Daylesford Secondary College

message: "Piercings, blemishes, acne and freckles have been airbrushed out of school portraits at a regional high school, outraging students and parents. 
Some students at Daylesford Secondary College have even reported their noses being changed and monobrows removed. "
http://www.smh.com.au/victoria/piercings-acne-monobrows-airbrushed-out-of-school-photos-in-daylesford-20150322-1m5att.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.185.245 (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  In The News
Talk:Frank Palumbo

message: Since Palumbo is dead, it seems a fairly simple matter to find a usable photo of him. Since I'm not really up on photo requirements, can someone please take a look at these and others for inclusion?  Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo request 

message: He appears to have owned the Ford car dealership in Darby, Pennsylvania. Anyone find something about that? Or is it someone else? I found an article that he gave a new car to Frank Sinatra. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car dealership 
Talk:President Gerald R. Ford Field Service Council

message: I re-merged the content for Nacha Tindey Lodge. Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Local Scouting articles (BSA) is the editing convention that supports this idea. Since there are no sources given for the content of Nacha Tindey Lodge, we can not presume that this topic has notability. With out notability an article can not stand on its own.R00m c (talk) 06:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-merged

message: Camp Gerber has been split from this article and should be remerged, as otherwise it is a non-notable standalone.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The COI poster () who revived this as a standalone article asserts that it is now part of Michigan Crossroads Council instead of President Gerald R. Ford Field Service Council. If anything we should target that page instead. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed, but it would be severely WP:UNDUE WEIGHT there, where it is only one of two dozen camps. This is where it was calved from and where it makes most sense geographically and historically.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Gerber Scout Reservation existed first during the Timber Trails council, then the West Michigan Shores Council, Gerald R Ford Council, then for one year the President Ford Field Service Council, then was Transferred to the Michigan Crossroads Council. The history of the camp should not be tied to one council as it served scouts not a particular council. Also the idea that it is not notable enough is without grounds. I give the example of Owasippe right next door that has its own article that is stand alone and has had time to develop. This article just needs more time to develop before being merged or deleted. Wikiedit2388 (talk) 05:41, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Due to concerns over undue weight, because Gerber Scout Reservation is sourced enough to stand alone, and lack of participation, I'm going to boldly close the merge discussion, leaving Gerber Scout Reservation where it is as a stand alone article. Feel free to revert and revive the discussion if you disagree. Tiggerjay (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Eti Maden

message: == What about the Mine? ==
The article "Boric Acid" links here for information about mining boric acid.  Somebody should add some information about the actual mine.  Paulburnett (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The article "Boric Acid" links here for information about mining boric acid.  Somebody should add some information about the actual mine.  Paulburnett (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the Mine?
Talk:Antarctic Floristic Kingdom

message: I see no reason why this article should not be merged with Antarctic flora. Your thoughts? Interlaker (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge I just stumbled across this, but I support the merge. Parts of the two articles appear (virtually) identical, and would benefit from being combined. - Metheglyn (talk) 01:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal Antarcic flora
Template talk:Leamington Spa former branch lines RDT

message: I have changed the diagram to show where the trains carrying cement products from Southam to the Rugby plant of Rugby cement ran. This is significant as the line stayed open for much longer than the rest. Because the direct line had been lifted the trains had to reverse at the site of Marton Junction to traverse the route. This  site has information on the practice. Britmax 16:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Great Central Railway line crossed the Weedon to Leamington line between Braunston and Flecknoe not where shown see: 1954 OS map of crossing. I've tried to alter the Template but can't get it right. Anyone want to have a go?
Rsloch (talk) 11:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Central Railway crossing 

message: On closer examination of this template, there is no connectional line shown from Weedon station to Daventry station, yet there was indeed such a connection that carried services on the Weedon to Marton Junction line. May I ask you to view this particular matter and to amend the template in order to show the connection.
Paul Sidorczuk (talk) 07:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template : Leamington Spa former branch lines
Talk:FK Viagem Ústí nad Labem

message: de. says that in this season the team had no management so couldn't compete, and for this reason they merged with FK Všebořice, then reentered at krajský přebor level. There are no citations but a couple of listed sources. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 23:16, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1998/99 "unknown" season
Template talk:Post–Cold War tanks/Archive 1

message: If "modern tanks" why is T-80 on the list but Challenger 1 not? GraemeLeggett 16:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern tanks

message: * Why do we need to include Merkava 3 as well?? It quite irritating to go directly to Merkava 4, when a single link to the Merkava would be good. By that logic.. the Challenger 1, Leopard 2A4, 2A5 & 2A6 should also be included.
* Secondly, the Arjun is in Limited service with the Indian Army (the Mk.1 version at least). Of course, it doesn't matter. Sam is the case with the MBT-2000. The black Eagle tank is a rumored prototype, and until someone actually sees the prototype, I suggest that we leave it out. No one has seen it, except for a hazy, very obscured view of a prototype camoflaged tank at some show. Plus, its still on the drawing board.
* I suggest that we only include tanks for which a prototype has been built, shown and tested, as well as those that have entered service in the past 10 yrs or will enter service in the next 3-4 years at most. That should remove the Type-88 from contention. Its too old and not the latest tank in service.
* I suggest a navbar on the template. I'm trying to add it, but I'm too good at the syntax. Could someone who's an expert add the navbar???
Waiting for ur opinions.
Cheers. Sniperz11 12:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi... a few suggestions 

message: Either we should split the template and separate between later developments of old tanks and modern tanks, or concentrate on the most modern tanks and prototypes. Flayer 11:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now [[Type 74]] added? This is ridiculous... 

message: It looks like I caused a small problem when I added the Type 74, so sorry about that. However, as an infrequent editor on this template, it's not clear to me what exactly constitutes a "modern tank" for the template. I read above where Sniperz11 had listed some thoughts on what the requirements should be, but those should be more formalized or listed somewhere. So going forward, it would be helpful to have either a definition of modern based on a strict date, such as any tank developed past 1980 or certain criteria which a tank must meet to fit on the template. Publicus 14:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a "Modern Tank"?
Talk:Chinese financial system

message: There appears to be a great deal of local debt in China, much of which is apparently not being paid back, see "More Stimulus May Not Be an Option for China". I'm not sure how it would fit in this article as I don't fully understand the entrepreneural activities of local governments in China. There is other interesting analysis in this article, particularly with respect to external and internal demand. User:Fred Bauder Talk 21:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Local debt

message: This article contains three references, so I have inserted the necessary templates. The writing itself seems decent, so if inline citations could be applied, then the article would be vastly improved. I will do my best finding online references to insert.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations urgently needed 
Talk:Diairesis

message: Yes, the Stoic content should reside on this page, and Dihairesis should be a redirect to here.  (Googling jstor.org shows 58 articles without h vs. 6 with.)  Wareh 16:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'll just redirect the page, can I leave it to you to take whatever content is useable and integrate it here? Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Here's the link to the old content, if you want to transfer anything: . Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it's still a mess, but I've combined the articles.  Wareh 16:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal