lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Purvanchal

message: We don’t need to divide state.  It is not being done for the good for the state, but for good of few in the west who are taking advantage of one –sided president power to reduce and disturb east for their own good.  If splitting had any advantage then Haryana and Punjab would have also been divided.  Why just split state rather split entire nation into two or four halves each having their own president and center so that they manage development instead of inefficient and dictator like parliament in the hand of few bureaucrat. 
Showmeusername (talk) 01:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  We don't need new states  

message: FRP नहीं हुआ हैँ तीन दिन हो गये नम्बर चालू हुये  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:A688:BA81:4933:2B85:2B53:982D (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FRP not success  

message: Recent edits dubiously conflate this region with the Bhojpuri region while the latter is specific to the language, this is used in the context of Indian state politics. The references obviously do not support it (the only mention being predominance of speakers which I have incorporated into the body), the edits being WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. Just because regions overlap should not mean they be conflated with each other. Gotitbro (talk) 07:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhojpuri region 

message: Varanasi
Prayagraj
Ayodhya
Gorakhpur
Jaunpur
Mirzapur
Azamgarh Ashutoshchaubeyabc (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous Cities

message: Bhaiya mere pass me paisa ka koi kami nhi hai Lekin baat hai ki mere upar gardin. Hahi bhaiya ek baat baan ke aawo aap please aur hai AAP jab vi aaiya Nepal mere bhabi ko Leke aaiya gaa 36.252.221.73 (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hii
Talk:3C 75

message: Distance from Earth? Discovery date? Discoverer (person, team, equipment)? Steve8394 (talk) 20:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 
Talk:3C 58

message: What's a synchrotron nebula as referred to in this article's introduction? I was looking it up here on Wikipedia but it had no article for it. And synchrotron alone just lead to a scientific device? Would be nice if a guide of some sort (explanation or article for it) could be added to Wikipedia. -- Northgrove 02:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 3C58 is the name of the remnant, not the pulsar. 82.239.117.104 15:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Synchrotron

message: There should probably be some indication that the theory that this may be a quark star is due to the early mentioned thing about it being cooler than it should be, rather than placed with an intervening comment between them and with no mention that the two are related.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.148.183.20 (talk) 06:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it and merged it into early paragraph, which also eliminated having a paragraph that consisted of only one sentence.  RJFJR (talk) 03:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  poor placement of "quark star" mention
Talk:Pratapgarh, Rajasthan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 08:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: in pratapgarh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.2.101 (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  new temple 

message: Ecoturism section : this section was added by me if you removed the creators contact remove the whole section.
this shows your attitude that you are ready for the profits but dont want to pay the price.
Shailendrakm (talk) 12:04, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Shailendrakm, 23 June 2010 

message: Kherot is a village situated 6 miles away from pratapgarh in south direction.
In this Village the Ravan Dahan is done by Guns  only. It is the only village which has this type of culture.Bold text  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhiranjan K Vyas (talk • contribs) 18:36, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kherot
Talk:Thompson language

message: I just created a stub article for Petlushkwohap Mountain, which is near Lytton and is the second-highest in the Lillooet Ranges.  BC Names has nothing on its name-origin....I've wondered if it might be in the local variety of Chinook Jargon, as "kwohap" may be the same as a word I recall as "thlwop" meaning a hole, "tlush" seems to be kloshe/kloosh, often rendered tloosh, meaning "good", and "pe" I know is a local word, including in St'at'imcets, not sure about Nlakapamuctsin, meaning "and", or as an emphatic.  Why it would mean "a really good hole" maybe a reference to it being surrounding by precipitous valleys, or some unknown feature......or it could be from Nlakapamuctsin, so thought I'd ask here....if anyone has a reference guide to Nlaka'pamux geographic names and can provide the answer, please add it to that article.Skookum1 (talk) 11:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaning of "Petlushkwohap"?
Talk:41 Arietis

message: The references listed do not seem to support the contents attributed to.  While containing interesting and worthwhile information, they seem not to function as indicated.  The information presented in the article does seem accurate, from other, more easily understood and relevant sources. In most cases what is obtained, going on line, is an abstract telling of some research conducted with further information either for a fee or membership in some organization. There are good websites however that do corroborate the information presented, such as Jim Kaler's astronomy website at .
Hipparcos stars at Astrostudio  and others that can be obtained by direct internet query. Pending good reason not to in the next few days, I plan on replacing the references given with more directly supportive and placing those given in simpler form in "See also" J.H.McDonnell 
(talk) 21:33, 14 November 2012 (UTC
:This is an article on a scientific topic and therefore scientific journal articles are preferred. Additional supporting references, particularly where they improve accessibility, are of course welcome. But there is no reason to remove the existing references, which readers might find useful for more in-depth research (this is one of the most useful aspects of Wikipedia). The See also section is not for external links or references but for internal links to other Wikipedia articles. mgiganteus1 (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References not supportive

message: In references that is. Bibcodes, dois, and other such indicators seem unnecesary extras that simply take up space, especially when standard url addresses reach the intended page. Moreover even when any of these methods is used, the url address still shows at the top of the page.  
When clicking on some inline reference simply sent the reader to "References" at the bottom, extras probably didn't matter all that much. But with on page pop-ups it seems that references should be as succinct as reasonably possible
J.H.McDonnell (talk) 21:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. They cause no harm, and alternative lookups are useful in cases where web sites are unavailable at the time. Praemonitus (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Superfluous information
Talk:Romanized Popular Alphabet

message: Around my area (Marysville, CA) White Hmong pronounce the vowel <o> unrounded, that is, as  not as .
I went to Sacramento and the Hmong I talked to said it  as well. Where do Hmong say ? Asia? The Eastern US? Or is it just individual variation and I haven't met a speaker who used the rounded vowel?
Bryce 21:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The pronunciation is based on Golston and Yang (2000).  I imagine they got data from Minnesota and/or as parts of the San Joaquin Valley where sizeable populations of Hmong speakers live.  It's possible that you've met some speakers who pronounce it unrounded but be wary of using only your ears to determine vowel qualities (although roundedness isn't as subjective as height and backness).  The best way is to record these speakers and do spectrograph analysis.  Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 00:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

text: FWIW, three of the major figures in Hmong linguistics (Heimbach, Ratliff, and Smalley) all give  in their various books. When I studied Hmong language at SEASSI, we also used . Nposs 03:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vowel spelled <o> 

message: I came here from Hmong language, which gives the pronunciation of "Hmong" as "Hmoob" and of "Mong" as "Moob" (both in RSA, which is strange on its own because it feels like IPA should be used instead), to find that this article does not mention 〈b〉 as a grapheme used in RSA at all. So what gives? One of these two articles is either wrong, not up to date, or missing important information. For the time being, I'm assuming any time a 〈b〉 is used, it's the same as when a 〈p〉 iss uset in the zame gondegzd, pud with the 〈p〉 zount foizet. (in the same context, but with the 〈p〉 sound voiced). Hppavilion1 (talk) 21:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *UPDATE*: Apparently, 〈b〉 is a tone. ...Sure? I guess that works. Disregard. Hppavilion1 (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  〈b〉 sound
Talk:Arthur Friedheim

message: Could someone please edit/correct the Wikipedia page for Arthur Friedheim?  He was a (legendary) PIANIST (one of Liszt's foremost students), not a "composer".  He might have composed a few trivial things here and there, once in a while, but so did most of the major pianists of their time.   There's a lot more that could be added but I don't have the time.   I tried editing (correcting) the page myself but wasn't sure whether I was supposed to actually delete the word "composer" or leave it as is and add the word "pianist" afterwards, in a different color, or....????
Thanks,
Paul Miller (forlino@ca.rr.com)
:I made the change. You can add things directly to the article if you like. There is much more information available about him in the external links. Rigadoun  (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friedheim 
Talk:Vasily Safonov

message: "Vasily Safonov, or Safonoff as he was known in the West during his lifetime,"
What is the West and where it is located? His name would be spelled as Safonow in Germany or Austria or (to a 50% likelihood) in France, so what is then the West?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.71.117.32 (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:44 Boötis

message: I have excised the below section from the article as it gives undue weight to a single conference poster  that has never subsequently been referred to in the literature (ADS shows 0 citations ). Especially given the apparent instability of the orbit which casts doubt on the reality of the object, this claim is neither notable nor plausible. 77.57.25.250 (talk) 10:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably for the best. Praemonitus (talk) 05:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excised section about possible companion
Talk:Coral Browne

message: That information is on principle acceptable in the article, but per WP:BLP reliable sources must be found for it. I don't think the source that was provided can be considered reliable, and furthermore, the URL that was provided does not point to any information mentioning Coral Browne or the other individuals listed at all. Quatloo 04:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And yes, even though this is not a living person, despite the name BLP does apply to dead individuals, per Jimbo Wales . Quatloo 04:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

text: waste of time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88888 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual orientation, affairs
Talk:Lancea (weapon)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: As a javelin is defined as a "light spear", the definition here make no sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 23:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:David Waters

message: This article started out about the Australian actor, and then got hijacked for an autobiography several times.  I've changed it into a disambiguation page, since notability is roughly equivalent for all three. MuffledThud (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Danielle Catanzariti

message: Sorry guys, I just don't believe this article was worthy of its Good Article Nomination, for the following reasons:
- the birth dates of Catanzariti are conflicting. One birth date assures me that Catanzariti had her birthday in February, yet another birth date on the same page tells me that her birthday is in April.
- there are spelling errors on the page.
If these errors are fixed promptly, I'm sure this page will be worthy of a GAN in the future.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tilly C (talk • contribs) 03:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review
Talk:Verutum

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 
Talk:Circle, Montana

message: Will be expanding article in the near future to include more detailed and encyclopedic content.
Ltvine 02:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Who is Justus Morlock esq.???? CheepnisAroma (talk) 16:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Justus Morlock esq.
Talk:List of Beyond the Break episodes

message: Why is this article seperate from Beyond the Break article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.130.37.150 (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this a separate article? 
Talk:Macropædia

message: Hi, 
I have before me the list of Macropædia articles from 1989 and 2007.  There are many articles in 1989 that have no counterpart in 2007, and vice versa, such as Adhesives (1989) and Electronic games (2007).  Some articles do have an analogous counterpart; for example, they have been split (e.g., "Information processing and Informations systems", 1 article in 1989, 2 articles in 2007), renamed (Leningrad vs. St. Petersburg) and/or revamped.  Clearly, we should discuss those separately and differently, I agree.  
But according to the lists before me, several articles have indeed been deleted.  If you disagree with those listings, please point out, with references, where the 1989 text (or an equivalent passage) can be found in a 2007 Macropædia article for the 1989 articles that I have listed as deleted.  If that is not possible, I hope that we can agree that the material has indeed been deleted.  Alternatively, if you're patient with me, I will go to the 2007 EB index on Monday and check whether "Adhesives", etc. is covered in the 2007 Macropedia.  Willow 02:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Question on this method, from someone not familiar with EB editorial policy: even if an individual article has been deleted in the current revision, does that mean that the material has been deleted, or could it have been merged into one or more different articles? Just saying the word 'deleted' might be too strong if the same material has been repurposed elsewhere in the EB. Opabinia regalis 05:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the articles have been merged. Willow, it's up to you to reference your claims. You can't make wild assumptions and then ask others to disprove them. I'm not going to look where each of the articles you describe as deleted has been merged to. The example of those Eastern European countries, which you fancily speculated have been removed because of "changing tastes", and which in fact have simply been grouped under "Balkan States", should suffice. Bramlet Abercrombie 12:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The old "Balkans" article will have been much shorter, not dealing in detail with the individual countries. You can't tell what in substance has been added or removed simply by looking at the lists of articles. Bramlet Abercrombie 12:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Do you really want to analyze this for all 700 articles? It could be interesting, but it might go into original research territory. Bramlet Abercrombie 15:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

text: "Change in coverage" is OK, but describing the "Adhesives" development alone would be useless in the article. You'd first need to have some more representative data about what kind of things have been reduced or extended in coverage. Bramlet Abercrombie 18:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions and Insertions
Talk:Lydia Yeamans Titus

message: Lydia just looked older than she was. IMDb, always accused of being wrong, is quite frequently correct as in this case with Lydia's birthdate of 1866. Lydia had an older sister named Jennie born in 1862 who actually was more famous than Lydia. Jennie died early of tuberculosis in 1906 at 44 and never appeared in motion pictures. Their mother Mrs Annie Yeamans was born in 1835/or 36 and maybe it's her birth year being confused with her daughter. There's a Broadway picture of Lydia & Jennie taken in the 1870s when they were children. I'll include it in the External Links of Lydias bio. Koplimek (talk) 16:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lydia Yeamans Titus, Question of Age
Talk:47 Tucanae

message: I've reverted the copy edit swap between 47 Tuc and NGC 104 to preserve the page history and requested User_talk:Bay_Flam to follow the proceedure at WP:RM if they wish to propose such a change so that if adopted we maintain the page history. WilliamKF 23:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 47 Tuc vs NGC 104

message: DO NOT, put this in the NGC objects category, the redirect is already in it and it will cause a double link.  thanks.Chris H 01:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NGC category

message: 47 Tucanae is not a Flamsteed designation; Flamsteed never catalogued objects this far south. It also isn't the Gould designation: 47 Tucanae was Bode's designation for this "star", which of course we now know isn't even a star.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.222.83.194 (talk) 13:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is wrong 

message: I doubt it very much, but perhaps I'm misunderstanding what the editor is trying to say.  --Yaush (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they are saying it wrong, or I dunno. Anyway, reverted. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "extragalactic"

message: Is it considered "one of the most massive globular clusters in the Galaxy" or a cluster in the proximity of the Milky Way galaxy and to its bulge, a cluster that occasionally passed through the galactic plane but is not a proper "part" of the Galaxy? For example, would the number of its stars be included when counting those of the Milky Way ?Meerwind7 (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 47 Tuc is definitely part of the Milky Way, and relatively close to the center as globular clusters go. -- Elphion (talk) 20:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of our Galaxy ?
Talk:Eva Dahlgren

message: Is there a reason she's in :Category:Swedish anti-communists? I mean maybe she is, but I didn't see anything notable on that.--T. Anthony (talk) 08:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is largely unreferenced, and has been for many years. I've just done a search and found tons of sources (mostly in Swedish, but still) and will be adding those shortly once I've had a chance to plough through them. Bear with me... --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:486 Cremona

message: ==Untitled==
that's it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.224.84.127 (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: asteroid or planet?

message: that's it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.224.84.127 (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Libertas

message: Since the subject of this article is specifically the Roman goddess, personification, concept Libertas, shouldn't it be illustrated with one of the numerous Roman coins depicting Liberty? Cynwolfe (talk) 01:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not Roman coin? 

message: What does "Roman robe is the main feature that invokes Libertas and the symbol of Liberty from which the Statue derives its name" mean?Royalcourtier (talk) 22:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification of the New York statue with Libertas 
Talk:Frieda Belinfante

message: Yesterday I corrected the date of death on the german wiki page of Frieda. The date of April 26, 1995 was also given there. This date is wrong. The correct date is March 5th, 1995. As can be seen from this article, which was published on March 7th, 1995: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-03-07-me-39790-story.html   --Zartesbitter (talk) 22:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of dead

message: Hi Folks!  This article lacks relevant information on the artistic accomplishments and cultural impact of the subject, who was my first piano teacher and a long-time personal friend.  I have done some research for sources and will be adding information over the next few weeks.  Please bear with my mistakes, as I've never edited a page in Wikipedia before. Laguna greg (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enlarging the article 

message: I removed the sentence "Belinfante's Orange County Philharmonic Orchestra was only the second orchestra ensemble in the world to be managed or conducted by a woman on a continuing basis." for lack of reliable sourcing. It seems to be an unsupported, and an unlikely claim, given this article in the journal College Music Symposium: . The journal article does not mention Belinfante but notes several orchestras founded, directed and conducted by women which predate the OCPO.  — CactusWriter (talk) 16:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported claim 
Talk:Quasar (motorcycle)

message: Before you think this isn't notable, please have a look at this list and do a google search on Feet Forwards Motorcycle or Quasar Motorcycle and look at the results. You'll find the Quasar is quite well known about, and even mentioned in wikipedia's own Feet forwards motorcycle page -- febtalk  02:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Crown (tooth)

message: I tried adding a JP:歯冠 interwiki link but got an error message. Could somebody with a better understanding of the interwiki links try and re-add it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:240:2409:D0C1:C101:A261:F9E:3773 (talk) 08:57, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki
Talk:Data control language

message: information provided by wikipedia is not correct, look at : http://orafaq.com/faq/what_are_the_difference_between_ddl_dml_and_dcl_commands
i.e. update cannot be dcl command, because whole idea of atomicity would be wrong then
I don't think the article is suggesting that UPDATE is a DCL command, rather the DCL commands GRANT and REVOKE, decides whether the user can use such commands as UPDATE and others.~~kenmacleod~~http://www.sqa.org.uk/e-learning/SoftDevRDS04CD/page_94.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KenMacleod2013 (talk • contribs) 10:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Dustin Clare

message: enslave romans 85.110.156.138 (talk) 13:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  gannicus make a new movie
Talk:GEH statistic

message: I notice that the GEH formula got changed incorrectly (the 2 in the numerator was changed to 0.5) and then corrected (the 0.5 was then moved to the denominator,) however 2 in the numerator is more simple and elegant than 0.5 in the denominator, so I've changed it back to that form. 58.168.241.42 02:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GEH Formula