lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trudy Monk

message: What was Trudys job? I though she was a Journalist, but I cant remember which episode its mentioned in.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.212.30 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Job? 

message: On this page, it says "She graduated from Stanford University, and met her future husband Adrian while he was working as a detective". I have not seen the episode revealing that information. However, according to the just-aired "Mr. Monk and the Class Reunion", it seems Trudy attended Berkeley with Adrian Monk where she first met him. Is this a continuity error or what? -Chinju 13:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berkeley or Stanford? When did she meet Adrian Monk? 

message: In the other synopsis of the episode where Monk chases the woman through the streets, it says she recieved a corneal transplant, but this page says and iris transplant....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PublixDani0324 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transplant patient
Talk:Discursive psychology

message: There are no criticisms of discursive psychology, see for example Ian Parker's work. This article draws heavily on earlier work in discursive psychology and does not meet recent trends and development, as a result of those critiques.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.231.129.49 (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: Er...........do we actually need QUITE so many entries in the further reading section?
:Six is too many from which to choose? -DoctorW 16:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The reading list seems sound and helpful to me.  Which ones are you proposing should be deleted and why?  Too many, seems to me to be a very weak justification for deletion.  Would you criticise a library for having to much to read for instance?  It is not as if space is a limit here.  What are you hoping to achieve through your comment here?  14:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading section

message: I would like to see the paragraph which consists only of the sentence; "It is philosophically opposed to more traditional cognitivist approaches to language." become a whole section that spells out what the differences are, comparing and contrasting. -DoctorW 16:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be helpful if you would expand on your wishes,  for instance providing some information on those matters from the research you have carried out yourslf into the matter. Perhaps then an editor could pull them together here for you.  84.250.130.175 (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contrast with cognitivist approaches
Talk:Conquests of the Longbow: The Legend of Robin Hood

message: Is anyone opposed to restoring the stub tag? I want to do this because many larger articles are still stubs and contain incomplete information (ex. The Legend of Kyrandia); surely more can be said about CotL than what's here. Cromag 19:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternatively, you could write the prose on a separate subpage of your user page and someone with a better understanding of Wiki encoding can integrate it into the article. Cromag 05:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liss, Hampshire

message: PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR BIAS AND UNFOUNDED BELIEF THAT EAST LISS IS A BADLY DESIGNED AREA. ESPECIALLY THE GREENFIELDS ESTATE THAT I FEEL HAS MATURED WELL OVER TIME.
I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT WIKIPEDIA IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA AND THEREFORE A PLACE OF FACT NOT FOR BIZARRE PERSONAL BIAS OPINION WHOEVER YOU ARE Mr.80.229.218.245 
PLEASE GRIND YOUR PERSONAL AXE ELSEWHERE
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearboy28 (talk • contribs) 
:CAPS LOCK. Hmmm angry heh?81.132.7.122 (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (User:Bearboy28 please sign your posts...)
The above is nearly as POV as the text complained about. I have removed the blatant POV of the original. The article needs a lot more work as to its sources. Djnjwd 00:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: --Alanmort (talk) 15:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Era 
Talk:Cable & Deadpool

message: I think any further descriptions of the events of issue 31 should wait until Civil War 4 is released. I mean, any sufficiently motivated fan can find out (and probably already knows), but for those who are just getting into it, I don't think they should be penalized for Marvel's delays. Substatic 18:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDP 31 

message: Can someone put the image of the cover of C&DP 39 near the latest storyline? I don't know how to put images into pages on Wikipedia. Here's a copy of the image: http://bp3.blogger.com/_B0Npgpriy3E/Rc6xTG9bUXI/AAAAAAAAADM/7rW8eDAU9iQ/s1600-h/blog_CABDPL039c_COV.jpg
--D'Argent 22:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Image 

message: This section needs some major decrufting. If no one summarizes properly it I'll replace it with a list of arcs and one-liner descriptions meanwhile. Sazielt c 20:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story Arcs 

message: some on needs to tell what issue dear deadpool stoped at because i just read my C&D comics and no dear deapool
*It'd help if you dated your comment and mentioned just which issues don't have Dear Deadpool. I assure you, they haven't cancelled the letters page. As of at least ish 40, Dear Deadpool is still going strong. Occasionally, they may skip a few issues, but it's not gone. Wilhelm Screamer 11:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  end of dear deadpool 

message: The story arcs description only goes to about issue 39. Can anyone update it? Andraxx 14:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 

message: In light of the above comment, I've suggested merging information from Fictional history of Deadpool since it is up to date and the two articles are currently overlapping.  It's not a simple cut and paste merge since the info in both articles is too long and detailed and needs to be condensed.~ Dusk Knight 05:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge info from [[Fictional history of Deadpool]] 

message: Was the series canceled, or did it simply conclude it's run. It seems unlikely that it was canceled seeing as both characters have gotten their own ongoing series. Cable began in March with Deadpool beginning this fall. Rau's Speak Page 02:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canceled 

message: I have removed the cleanup which requested trimming of story arc section, and instead generated sub sections to fit wiki style and to aid in article organization. Information offered was pertinent and consistent with other similar articles. There are however a few subsections that could use trimming because they themselves are individually a bit too long.NietzscheSpeaks (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Tag
Talk:Linguine

message: Does linguine have different ingredients, then say perciatelli? (unsigned comment)
:No, all dry pasta consists of wheat + water.  Some kinds also have eggs and perhaps vegetables (spinach etc.) mostly for color. --Macrakis 19:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ingredients

message: took was stated to have "his legs look like linguini."' This doesn't make any sense to me.  What is a beatdown? What does it mean to take a beatdown? How can a beatdown be stated to have his legs look like something?  Could someone render this into intelligible standard English? --Macrakis 19:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture section

message: The Italian version of this article says that linguine is originally from Genova and not Campania: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguine.The source for this article is to be found online but I assume that the Italians know better about pasta even if they don't provide a source so I still believe linguine comes from Genova (unless otherwise proven). Some U.S. chefs don't know what they are talking about. In fact, there is a great tendency in the U.S. to link lots of Italian things to either Campania and Sicilia (which make only 1/10 of of regions of Italy). Chef Flay should probably point out the source of his information: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/05/earlyshow/contributors/bobbyflay/main2065103.shtml
ICE77 (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For heavens sake...its a noodle!Logjam42 (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is it from??? I've found sources saying Campania or Liguria. I changed it so it just says Italy as no sources agree. Flalf (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct origins 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ksuong2001 (talk) 06:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Online Communities
Talk:New Bradwell

message: Does anybody have it?  --Concrete Cowboy 20:22, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Bradwell Blitz

message: The text speculates that the Bradwell Blitz bombing might have been an attempt to hit Wolverton Railway Works. This I very much doubt as attacks on large industrial sites required multiple aircraft to be effective. More likely the railway line was seen and and attacked. Even with targeting flares involved, it is probable that some aircraft failed to find their primary target in the Midlands and chose the railway line as a secondary target on the way home. 82.9.70.201 (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of Bradwell Blitz
Talk:Anchored cross

message: This page is way off.  The "cross moline" is so called in French sometimes, but in English heraldry is never called an "anchored cross" and at any rate it is not a religious symbol but (unlike every other cross, which is) is supposed to represent a millstone.  --Daniel C. Boyer 14:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is considered one of the earliest Christian symbols, and this can be seen in excavations from the Catacomb of Priscilla and the Catacomb of Callixtus in Rome. See this link for more info. Viriditas (talk) 11:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross moline
Talk:Peterborough Lift Lock

message: *How long does it take for the lock to cycle?
*Dimensions?  --  Geo Swan 20:27, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: How long?

message: I've removed the reference to the larger of the two displacement figures.  Given the dimensions of the lock, the 1542 ton displacement figure is not possible. To wit:
 140 ft    •    33 ft    •    9.83 ft        = 45430 ft³ of volume in the lock
  
 45430 ft³ of water • 0.03123 short tons/ft³ =  1418 short tons
                                                1266 long tons
                                                1286 metric tons
                                             2836588 pounds
Naturally, the actual tonnage of water will be somewhat less, as the lock doesn't fill completely.  Nonetheless, the math works out in such a way as to make a 1542 ton displacement impossible.  However, any structure that moves 2.8 million pounds of anything is pretty impressive.  --Ssbohio 18:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Displacement

message: This bit sounds really confusing:
The dual lifts are the highest hydraulic boat lifts in the world...It is not the highest boat lift of any type in the world today  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.154.66.58 (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro Wording
Talk:Anns v Merton LBC

message: In what jurisdiction did this apply (before it was overruled in the cited case)?
===============================================================================
Anns v Merton LBC [1978] AC 728
http://www.legalabbrevs.cardiff.ac.uk/searchabbreviation/
cardiff says: England & Wales
Anns suggested a two stage test in determining whether a duty of care was owed:
(1)	If the defendant knew or ought to have know that its conduct might cause harm to the plaintiff, and
(2)	If there is no policy reason for negating that duty, then there is a duty.
This approach can also be contrasted with the three-stage test used in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
(1)	The damage was reasonably foreseeable.
(2)	A relationship of  “proximity” existed
(3)	In the circumstances, it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty.
Nev 03:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to add

message: Anns v Merton LBC [1978] AC 728
http://www.legalabbrevs.cardiff.ac.uk/searchabbreviation/
cardiff says: England & Wales
Anns suggested a two stage test in determining whether a duty of care was owed:
(1)	If the defendant knew or ought to have know that its conduct might cause harm to the plaintiff, and
(2)	If there is no policy reason for negating that duty, then there is a duty.
This approach can also be contrasted with the three-stage test used in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
(1)	The damage was reasonably foreseeable.
(2)	A relationship of  “proximity” existed
(3)	In the circumstances, it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty.
Nev 03:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ===================================================================
Talk:Aura (paranormal)

message: A full rewrite was suggested, I cleaned up the article a bit but more work is definitely needed.  — PaleoNeonate — 01:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to Karlpoppery for rewriting substantial parts of the article. — PaleoNeonate — 15:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Opening this discussion.  Comments welcome, thanks — PaleoNeonate — 16:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also want to request that the I.P. address making these changes would start leaving edit summaries to explain what they are doing. Thank you for your work, but it's confusing at times. Also, please consider creating an account. KarlPoppery (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

text: My changes were reverted again, without communication.  This seems to be disruptive.  I'm now reading on what should be done...  — PaleoNeonate — 20:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

text: Semi-protection requested, will see...  — PaleoNeonate — 21:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

text: Thank you for your input, as well as your cleanup, I agree with your recent changes.  —PaleoNeonate - 13:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  rp vs sfn 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 20:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 March 2022 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Human energy field and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 16#Human energy field until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 15:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Human energy field" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Adaptive Communication Environment

message: License information is missing from the article.  --81.84.152.156 (talk) 03:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  License information 
Talk:Being There (Wilco album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 20:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: "Tweedy felt that Wilco was incomplete without a second guitarist in addition to John Stirratt."
Except for a few occasions, Mr. Stirratt is the bass player. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.86.75.37 (talk) 05:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhh what? 

message: Easy one this time, I made a couple of WP:MOS changes (en-dashes mainly for page ranges in the references) but other than that, it's good to go to WP:GA.
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
 
Good work.  The Rambling Man 14:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review
Talk:Ricicles

message: Pack picture has two problems; (a) It's too big, and probably wants an annotated box, and (b) it's a special promo pack, so not really representative... I don't know how to do these yet. If someone else doesn't fix them, I might eventually.
BTW, I remember *years* ago, before Captain Rik, there was another Ricicles mascot that I believe may have been a junior version of Tony the Tiger. Any info?
Fourohfour 20:59, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

message: it says distributed by Nestlé, but i'm a bit confused. surely its just Kellogg's, no relation to nestle? 86.135.70.225 (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nestlé?
Talk:Microsoft RPC

message: yep.  i'm definitely biased :)  i'm annoyed, because ms implemented a _great_ system in nt domains and they then messed up part of the details, and because ms have such a bad reputation people believe that the baby should be thrown out with the bathwater.  i'm annoyed at the free software community or more specifically its sponsors for doing e.g. stupid things like creating "dbus" which has taken what five man-years to develop, at the expense of IGNORING freedce and fixing the threading and not adding a plugin transport that would then make dbus look like the toy that it is.
so yes i'm thoroughly biased but i've been researching this area for over seven years finding out different computing technologies, information on them etc.  it's very very convoluted and complex, as one might expect the history of inter-related projects spanning quite literally man-centuries to be.
anyway, the info i first dropped in here is a place-holder to get my head round a few other issues, cleaning up the netbios stuff, the netbeui stuff, smb, cifs, msrpc, dcerpc, dcethreads, dce, nt domains, the whole 9 yards _and_ its dog, as people tend to go "hi i want a windows please" and then think it's just one protocol... well it ain't!!
:I remember reading up into DCE several years ago, I found a lot of accusations on the web that Microsoft "hijacked" a of code from  DCE/RPC in "MSRPC" 
 MSRPC is derived from the DCE 1.1 reference implementation, but has been copyrighted by Microsoft.  None of the UNIX vendors at the time wanted to implement DCE/RPC it at the time.
Later on, DCOM would be 'donated' by  MicroSoft to the Open Group as a marketing stunt. The "D" to COM was due to extensive use of DCE/RPC – more specifically Microsoft's "enhanced" version,  MSRPC.  However, DCOM is pretty worthless without a bunch of application-level class libraries, such as ODBC, OLE DB, ADO, and ASP to run on top of it. Microsoft never released these specifications to the public, so these technologies have never been available for Unix.   Ugly bit of history that no one seem to have commented upon in Wikipedia Cuvtixo 19:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gurston Down Motorsport Hillclimb

message: If you do a Google search for "Gurston Down", the resulting text includes the phrase "Official site of the Gurston Down Motorsport Hillclimb" - so in spite of the fact that the official site largely ignores the word "Motorsport", I've put it in as it seems to be the proper full name. There are redirects from Gurston Down hillclimb etc so it shouldn't matter too much. Loganberry (Talk) 21:26, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: It's true that Gurston is the only hill which has a downhill start, but it's not the only one with a downhill section, as Loton Park has one. Loganberry (Talk) 14:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downhill section 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the start line at Wiscombe Hill, near Branscombe in Devon, is also downhill.  The marshalls used to use a wooden block to stop the cars rolling forward through the timing beam, as I remember. 
Spjspencer (talk) 20:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: Downhill section
Talk:High-definition television in the United States

message: The table at the List of current American high-definition channels section is a readability and accessibility nightmare, and needs to be completely reformatted, IMO.
First thing – get rid of the 'Letterbox/Pillarbox' column which is 1) entirely unsourced, and is 2) mostly extraneous info anyway (if this is at all relevant, it can be mentioned in prose, sourced to something). Second, why is 'Broadcast' 'colspanned' across two columns, but not cable?! – the broadcast nets should have a 'Category' as well: call it either 'General' or 'Entertainment'.
Third, my strong advice would be to split this info into two tables – one for networks that broadcast in 720p (e.g. ABC) and one for 1080i (which is most TV networks). This would eliminate another column from the table, and would eliminate a lot (though not all) of the horrible use of rowspan in the table which is a readability/accessibility nightmare. 
Finally the 'First launched HD service' date either need to be sourced to something or that column too should be removed from the table.
But the current table is a mess, and seriously needs to be cleaned up. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of current American high-definition channels Table Needs To Be Reformatted
Talk:Libuše

message: I've read a "hypothesis" that Libuše's father, Krok, was identical with Krak, the legendary founder of Kraków. In that case, Libuše would have been Wanda's sister. Does it make any sense to the Czech people? – Kpalion (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rope stretcher

message: This title is too general for a specific Wikipedia article. It also contains much information irrelevant to Rope stretchers. Originally tagged by User:Gene Nygaard. Ian Cairns 21:55, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I've reverted the edit tonight that had Edit summary 'added image' since it was clearly an irrelevant image and was an excuse for dumping more of the same irrelevant material that has been inserted into Myle, Mille Passus, etc, etc, etc. This idea is to keep articles within the subject matter and relevant. Ian Cairns 23:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: In what country and what era?  Detroit in the 1950s?  14th-century France?  Ancient China? Michael Hardy 00:06, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: WHEN and WHERE????

message: Who wrote that ridiculous article on "rope stretchers" ?
They were NOT the surveyors of ancient Egypt! Threy were merely the assistants to the Scribe Surveyor! I am not aware as to how the Scorpion Macehead refers to any surveying at all, but the piece may be incorrectly citing that artefact instead of the Palermo Stone (c. 2350 BC) which DEFINITELY has surveying references on it!
It would be advisable to Wikipedia, as a protection for some credibility, to not post articles by dunces who DO NOT PROPERLY CHECK THEIR SOURCES AND INFORMATION !?!
Signed: John F. Brock, Australia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.164.130 (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am with you on some of the ancient Egyptian history articles. Feel free to correct them. I have some questions here that you may be able to help with: Talk:Seshat. --Timeshifter (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally wrong information