Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mining

message: I have nominated Uranium for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm  Talk 18:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for uranium 

message: Today, I added WP Mining to List of mines in Russia Talk page. While working on orphan articles, at Category:Orphaned articles from July 2013 I found many of those mines are in Russia. At the Talk page here, I posted a section with many Russia mines, and asking for help to add those mines into the list. JoeNMLC (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of mines in Russia 

message: Today, while de-orphaning Russia mines, I found:
*Gusevogorskoye mine  (Gusevogor skoye)
*Gusevogoroskoye mine (Gusevogor o skoye)
Wondering if these two Iron mines are same article? JoeNMLC (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *  - today I added "Distinguish" to both these mines, updated stubs, added 1 cite. Asking for expert help please. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible duplicate articles 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: I recently added a bunch of images to :Commons:Category:Shafer Museum, including quite a few that relate to mining. Not a topic I know much about, and no doubt someone knowledgeable could do a lot to improve descriptions and categorizations of these. - Jmabel | Talk 22:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help requested on Commons 

message: Please help review Draft:Electra Battery Materials, so this can be published. Sabih omar 20:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please review Draft:Electra Battery Materials 

message: Uranium mining in the Bancroft area needs probably one more source assessment at Featured Article Candidates. If anyone is willing to assess the article, it would be helpful.
Link: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Uranium mining in the Bancroft area/archive1 CT55555(talk) 14:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Uranium mining in the Bancroft area]]