Talk:Boeing C-40 Clipper

message: - BillCJ (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. I am closing the discussion, and will merge shortly. I don't know how I missed this one, but it shouldn't have been created in the first place. Was done in apparent good faith tho. - BillCJ (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060825213451/http://boeing.com:80/defense-space/military/c40/news/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/c40/news/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked. (a bit late) Redalert2fan (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: wondering why bilcat takes it upon himself to revert properly formatted and referenced unit listings, there is no stated format specifying only squadrons; there are numerous aircraft articles on wiki that include parent units and home bases.  Yet another example of how some editors misuse their power.Bob80q (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit listings 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150218011454/http://www.boeing.com:80/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160507224503/http://www.scott.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123218288 to http://www.scott.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123218288
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150218011454/http://www.boeing.com:80/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223012245/http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c-40b/index.page to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c-40b/index.page
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330113319/http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.display&key=56247B5B-1D67-4350-8DBE-4E02F17EFA2D to http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.display&key=56247B5B-1D67-4350-8DBE-4E02F17EFA2D
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207090535/http://history.navy.mil:80/planes/c-40.html to http://www.history.navy.mil/planes/c-40.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023025242/http://boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html to http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060605a_nr.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217141936/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=10514 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=10514
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160508000250/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9705 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=9705
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-space/military/c40/index.page
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://history.navy.mil/planes/c-40.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boeing C-40 Clipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160508003639/http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=12085 to http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=12085
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: updated the section on "Operators" to include better references and addition of USMC unit but someone continues to revert it.  Any explanation?2601:149:8100:B951:9963:681A:552A:73A3 (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Bob80q, you aren't allowed to edit Wikipedia, as you've been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts and IPs, just like you're doing right now. - BilCat (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

text: don't know who that person is, editing and writing without logging in is allowed per wiki rules. Lame excuse for reverting an appropriate edit of course you have a long history of doing so and your reversion of appropriate posts and additions constitutes edit warring.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:149:8100:B951:9963:681A:552A:73A3 (talk) 20:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please Bob, you're not fooling anyone. You edit the same types of articles as you did before you were blocked, with the same styles, among other things. Reverting socks is clearly not vandalism. - BilCat (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit Listings