lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cytec Industries

message: It's a tourist guide to Strasbourg:  "There are several ways to get to know Strasbourg..." Tonywalton  | Talk 16:07, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here is the translation that I got from Altavista's Babelfish:
:In order to explore Strasbourg, different possibilities offer themselves: With one city-stroll by the old part of town go past you at the most beautiful objects of interest. On the basis of the Ancienne Douane, to the old customs office to the Ill go you in few steps to the world-well-known cathedral. At the cathedral Muenster the Maison chamber cell, a reichverzierter framework construction is worth seeing (today restaurant). Cathedral following by the Rue Hellebardes over the Place good mountain to the former Gerberviertel Petite France with its old pictorial half timbered houses to the Ill up to the Ponts Couverts (covered bridges) and to Vauban resistance. From the observation deck one has a beautiful view over Strasbourg. Interesting also an inspection of the "European quarter" is in the proximity of the Orangerieparks on the bank of the Ill (Council of Europe, European parliament, palace of the human rights)
:Recommendable: commentated ship round travels on the Ill, those the old part of town encloses (landing place at the palace de Rohan) or a round travel with the mini course by the old part of town, duration: 45 minutes of the Place you Chateau out (at the south side of the Muenster). Strasbourg has in the meantime also an exemplary cycle track net. It is worthwhile itself in any case to become acquainted with Strasbourg with the wheel. Our tip: for a daily trip the car in Kehl park and drive by bicycle into the city center Strasbourgs.
The text sounds suspiciously like something out of a brochure and therefore is potentially a copyvio. If someone is able to look into this more, that'd be great. Nevertheless, this article is misnamed and should be moved. Solarusdude 20:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation / Possible Copywrite Violation
Talk:T-44

message: This article relies on some really weak sources (discussed elsewhere such as the T-55, ZSU-57-2 and BMP articles) that should be cleaned out. JED in particular is not reliable. I tagged the article. DMorpheus (talk) 06:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In addition, I've just found and marked references that are dead links or self published from forums. Between them they are used inline 44 times. Hohum (talk) 01:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak sources 

message: from this video it is made clear that in may 1994, bosnian soldiers captured 2 t44 from the serbs.
0:40:40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vBm02fbyuw&feature=related  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.27.60 (talk) 23:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  T44 in bosnia war? 

message: It is a medium tank, but it's quite far from "first generation". It's not a first generation MBT either.68.145.212.169 (talk) 23:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, removed "first generation". (Hohum @) 14:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The T-44 is a first-generation medium tank" 

message: I had a book about tanks, sorry I can't remember the title, but it referred to a Russian FT-17 clone from around 1920 that had a transverse engine. Sorry I can't provide any more information at this time.   68.69.149.18 (talk) 15:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first tank with transverse engine?
Talk:Doctor Arkeville

message: Hypno-Chip can't be it's own article, but Energo sword and Wash'n'Roll can? Dr Archeville 19:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypno-Chip as Article 
Talk:Digital theatre

message: * Replacing footonotes markup using  and 
* Adding some photos from commons
* Eliminate redline links by creating stubs
≈ jossi ≈ 16:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: Hello we are in our third year at uni and we have an assignment to create a digital performance wiki entry...so we would like to propose to have a section on your page under the title of Digital Performance as we have noted that there are some difference between digital theatre and digital performance such as the types of performances- through webcams, webcasts, installations and online environments. Also reading up on the history of digi perf it is also diff to your history section. --Rachelm301 (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Barbados national cricket team

message: Ooh, good stuff! Why Barbados rather than Barbadian, though? Not that it matters given the redirect; I'm just curious. Loganberry (Talk) 16:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I was kinda thinking about that myself. When I created the article, I modelled it on the clubs of England - i.e. Worcestershire County Cricket Club - but as these are administered by Associations I found it a bit odd to call the article the Barbados Cricket Association (or whatever it is, I can't remember at the mo). I see that a move is probably in order to get it within standards of all the other national cricket teams (although I pity the person who has to find the correct adjective for Trinidad & Tobago. Sam Vimes 16:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I'd have plain Trinidad and Tobago cricket team, since we have United States cricket team and New Zealand cricket team. And Barbados, though not usually a "cricketing nation" (I don't know if that's an official term, but you know what I mean) is representative of an independent country - even though the English team isn't! I think this should probably go at Barbadian cricket team, but it doesn't bother me enough that I feel it's an urgent move. Loganberry (Talk) 17:53, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Bah. I like consistency. There you are, it's moved Sam Vimes 19:43, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Consistency we can't have until someone invents a sensible adjective for the USA! (Or unless we go for England cricket team and so on.) Of course, there's also the point that some teams' names have changed: it was just Trinidad until 1962-63, in spite of political union with Tobago having happened in the 19th century! Loganberry (Talk) 23:10, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Lonesome Bob

message: It seems to me that it is now appropriate to remove the "needs-additional-citations" tag from the page.  (the article may be lacking, but I'd say what it has is sufficiently sourced).  I'm new here, so I'll hold off on doing it myself for now, and I'll wait to see if anyone disagrees. Bsammon (talk) 21:42, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Acwilson9 (talk) 03:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Bucket shop

message: OK guys.
There are 2 definitions of bucket shop.
Like many words or phrases, it can mean 2 different things.
Please don't delete one definition, but keep both.
:I've heard "bucket shop" used for a travel agency, without pejorative implication, in (I think) an episode of the English detective series Bulman.  — I've never heard the armorials called "buckets" before; tell me more?  —Tamfang 06:39, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 Definitions

message: The structure of this article is sloppy. It needs to be reorganized, and perhaps edited a bit, but I'm not familiar with the content. 68.14.76.151 18:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you ask just about anyone in the heraldic community what a bucket shop is, they will give you a response similar to this article. For most heraldic enthusiasts, it is the bain of their existence.--Eva bd 14:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Structure

message: I've seen heraldic preceded by both "a" and "an" in different places. Is there a Wikipedia policy on this issue? In this article, it has just been changed to "an," but I usually say "a" when I'm speaking. Is it a British/American usage thing?--dave-- 14:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "an heraldic" or "a heraldic"

message: The two concepts of "bucket shop" are distinct and require their own articles.  I am interested in improving Bucket shop (stock market).
patsw (talk) 13:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Discussion 

message: This article contains too much information for being a mere disambiguation page, so the associated templates should be removed. __meco (talk) 23:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a disambiguation page 
Talk:Juju (disambiguation)

message: Right now, the article for Juju, in the West African sense, reads more like a dictionary entry than an encyclopedic one. There's too much focus on all the meanings of "Juju", which are covered under Juju (disambiguation). The pop culture references to Juju are interesting and can be modified for an overhauled version, but there may have been a little too much zeal involved. I'm not a very experienced editor and I'd appreciate others' help/input on fixing this-- it's a little overwhelming. LindeeK 12:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant? 

message: I've added an image, but have to admit I'm a little worried about its accuracy - it's a Victorian English view of Ju-ju, and sounds a bit sensationalist. Adam Cuerden talk 21:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I still cant see anything just click the plus sign at the top of the page and then create a thingie i am doing!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.138.42 (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  juju!!
Talk:Lockheed WC-130

message: From the article:
"The WC-130 is flown exclusively from Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi"...
:I saw a TV report where the reporter, who flew along on a mission, said that they landed and ended the mission in the United States Virgin Islands.  Is it possible that depending on the location of the particular mission, that they may temporalily operate from other bases/fields? --Rogerd 16:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other bases 

message: >> Only two WC-130s have been lost during operational missions, H-model 65-0965, on 12 October 1974, and another H-model, 65-0968, on 2 May 2018. 
It should be clarified in the article that the second aircraft, 65-0968, was not an operational WC-130H but was employed by an Air Guard unit in the transport role.  It had not been a weather recon aircraft for a number of years.  After de-conversion some time after 1992, it was with the 105th AS of the Tennessee ANG, and then airlift with the Puerto Rico ANG.
Herefordnuthouse (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be clarified
Talk:Susan Stroman

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I'm making simple improvements through copyedits.  Here is a sentence that is slightly incoherent, that I excised from the article to await correction:
:Its success and record twelve Tony Awards proved a bittersweet triumph. 
Question:  What was bittersweet?  Did she not want to win awards?  Did her husband die (an unrelated fact)?
Zaslav (talk) 15:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing questions 
Talk:Sliver: The Best of the Box

message: For the record (no pun intended), it was Krist's idea to release the live album, it was Dave's idea to release the box set, and it was Courtney's idea to release the greatest hits album.  Granted, the greatest hits album is the worse album Nirvana has ever released, but so what?  It's only natural that a best-of-the-box would be released.  And the more unreleased material that gets released, the better.
Allixpeeke 02:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pfff. 

message: What exactly is a "boombox demo"? The boombox article only mentions the stereo.--Teiladnam 21:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it means "demo-tape recorded using a boombox stereo". --Maxxicum 06:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boombox 
Talk:Judique, Nova Scotia

message: Everyone in Judique at that time was refer to as "mac" (lastname)
This article reads like a tourist brochure, not an encyclopedia entry. It probably ought to be heavily rewritten. Donald Ian Rankin 23:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Downhaul

message: Please don't give me grief about the use of "downhaul" for Cunningham. It's quite common (e.g. in Bermuda, where I'm from, as well as in the US). Do a web search for "downhaul"+"mainsail" and you will see lots of uses for "downhaul" in that sense. Noel (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cunningham
Talk:Brad Fitzpatrick

message: Is there any other source besides a gossip blog? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Booticon (talk • contribs) 14:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you link to the entry? Booticon (talk) 02:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's one which I assume you consider gossip... And then there's photos of him at Google on Halloween... And here's a page discussing what he's doing while working at Google... But no, I couldn't find anything in his LiveJournal... I guess I've got nothing but circumstantial evidence. Oh well. —XSG 07:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: And here's one that nails it shut...  —  X  S  G  06:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go!  Lady Galaxy 13:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brad working for Google? 

message: I have reason to believe that Brad is at present interested in learning basic Russian (makes sense, considering the recent purchase of Live Journal by a Russian outfit). Since this doesn't qualify as "avid" in my book, I've removed the uncited statement that he's an avid student of Russian. Granted, my word is as much hearsay as the original statement, however Wikipiedia articles should err on the side of accuracy. —XSG 01:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''avid'' Russian language student 
Talk:Jim Breen

message: Yes, I'm still alive, not having died in either 2001 or 2003. JimBreen 01:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So reports of your death are exaggerated?   Exploding Boy 04:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears so. I missed them myself. Since I was living in Japan in 2001, it's not surprising. Must have given my students in 2002 and 2003 a fright being taught by someone dead.JimBreen 10:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Had a good laugh at this talk page; very glad to hear you're still alive Jim!  You are a legend to me for all your work in the Eng-Japanese computer dictionaries.  I would not have been able to learn Japanese without that work!  For me, you get your picture on my wall of fame in helping me understand Japan; it goes right next to Lafcadio Hearn!  Thank you Jim!  Mateo de Colón (talk) 17:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Still...alive!
Talk:Whiteboys

message: I added a tiny bit of information cited in Peter Way, Common Labor: Workers and the Digging of North American Canals 1780-1860. His original source was Michael Beame, Peasants and Power: the Whiteboy Movements and their Control in Pre-Famine Ireland. I assume this latter book would be a great place to start if anyone is really interested in expanding this stub. --Brian Z 17:24, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Source 

message: wouldn't you consider a paragraph on whiteboyism and poltics? I am not an expert on the issue, so I venture to humbly submit a few suggestions. First, I would think it worthwhile to note that Whiteboys was a purely apolitical and areligious phenomenon (e.g. raiding clergy of both religions). Second, maybe it makes sense to note that when whiteboyism spread to Ulster it evolved into sectarian organisations, later labelled Orangemen and Defenders.  Third, one might ponder upon a remark that some Irish nationalists and some historians (e.g. Tom Garvin) label Irish Republican Army "descendants of the Whiteboys" and see some modern conflicts, like the Orange vs Green contest or the Tan War distant echoes of whiteboyism. Dd1495 (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics

message: I think you need to consider the Black foot Irish which became shortened to Black Irish, this group began in the 1600's after the plantation.  The White Irish were catholics who supported their own and fought against the protestants, anyway they could,  in trying to drive them out.  The Black foot Irish were catholics who associated with the protestants.  This division in the catholic population resulted in ongoing trouble between the white and the black, which moved with them to North America.  The most notable encounter on North American soil is the Murder of the Donnelly's, from Tipperary, Ireland, who were murdered by the White Irish in Lucan, Ontario, Canada.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.204.215.124 (talk) 16:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black foot Irish
Talk:King's Cross Thameslink railway station

message: I've made "City Widened Lines" a wikilink, but it is red. Please clarify or redirect this item. Bhoeble 17:28, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I assume that a new building will be constructed on the site at some point. Does anyone have any information about any such proposal? Wimstead (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Future of the building

message: I understand that this is slightly different here as KCT is closed... but where the next station is listed as Kentish Town, should this not in fact be St Pancras International..?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.24.190 (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Next Station Box

message: Should King's Cross Thameslink railway station be in present tense or past tense? - 2A02:C7F:EDA0:6400:DDAF:C6B8:DF7F:6D91 (talk) 23:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should King's Cross Thameslink railway station be present tense (is) or past tense (was)?
Talk:Brachial plexus

message: This page seriously needs an illustration. --Dubbin 17:29, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Could someone please help fill in the empty boxes in the table at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachial_plexus#Specific_branches ? 173.225.249.190 (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific branches
Talk:Meadow brown

message: The picture accompanying this page shows a gatekeeper, (Pyronia tithonus), not a meadow brown. There are further picture inaccuracies when you look for more pictures - including a ringlet masquerading as a meadow brown.
: That comment refers to a previous photo. Hopefully the current one is OK.  Ghouston 10:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect picture 

message: Are phobias not abnormalities? The link to neophobia defines it as the persistent and abnormal fear of anything new. (Persistent _and_ not _or_.) Surely predators exercise normal caution when reacting to sudden displays, not abnormal morbid fears?
If not, please can the author cite a reference for the assertion that there are neophobic predators out there?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caligo (talk • contribs) 09:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neophobia
Talk:Milwaukee City Hall

message: This article doesn't make sense.  It surpassed the Manhattan Life building as being the tallest in the world, but was only the third tallest when it was completed?  How does that make sense? --216.207.86.82 18:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has to do with how skyscrapers are measured (topmost accessable floor, spires and flag poles, etc)... if I recall, by one metric, City Hall was the tallest inhabited structure when built, but the Washington Monument was taller. Sulfur 07:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Philadelphia City Hall was also taller.  mmathu 23 September 2011  —Preceding undated comment added 14:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm removing the reference, since the cited link has expired and by itself a minor fire in a public building doesn't seem that important (Will anybody remember or care in ten years?).  --Chancemichaels 14:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007 fire
Talk:Control system

message: As a control engineer myself, I think the Control engineering section covers most of what is covered here (and in fact most of the stuff I was thinking of adding to this page).
:Control engineering remains a separate article from Control theory and this article. ~Kvng (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE control engineering 

message: However, the fuzzy logic paradigm may provide scalability for large control systems where conventional methods become unwieldy or costly to derive: if it's more than the personal believing of the author, an authoritative reference would be nice. Engelec 20:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a  tag to this statement. ~Kvng (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuzzy logic 

message: Ggg 197.252.214.244 (talk) 11:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  similarities between power system and control system
Talk:Markus Kuhn (computer scientist)

message: This looks like a vanity entry, and should be deleted. An encyclopedia should contain only individuals who have achieved fame, for example by their achievements. Editing wikipedia is a nice thing to do, but it doesn't justify an wikipedia entry. 147.188.192.41 17:14, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone puts it to VfD, I'll vote to keep; Kuhn is a notable researcher in the field. Look at the work on Soft Tempest for example - incredible stuff.—ciphergoth 12:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity entry 

message: Following a recent call for references, here is the beginning of a list of some related media coverage that may or may not be of interest to editors of this article:
* 1996-11-18: Der Spiegel, 47/1996 (on tamper resistance and the DS5002FP attack)
* 1998-02-07: Washington Post, p H01 (on video eavesdropping)
* 1998-02-23: Der Spiegel, 9/1998 (on video eavesdropping)
* 1998-03-05: computing, p 1 (on video eavesdropping, also 1998-05-12)
* 1998-03-12: The Daily Telegraph, p 6 (on video eavesdropping)
* 2002-03-13: Times 2, p. 9 (on Audio CD DRM)
* 2002-03-16: New Scientist, p. 22–23 (on optical compromising emanations)
* 2002-03-23: New Scientist, p. 22 (on the NDS vs. Canal+ case, Chicago 1999 paper)
* 2002: FOCUS 12/2002, p. 159 (on optical CRT eavesdropping)
* 2002-05-28: Süddeutsche Zeitung, p. V2/11 (on optical CRT eavesdropping)
* 2002-06: Scientific American, pp. 18–19 (on the risks of Unicode domain names)
* 2003-11-22: New Scientist, pp. 30–33 (on leap seconds)
* ...
plus all the old VideoCrypt stuff.
Markus Kuhn 14:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Media coverage

message: Since "2006 or so", what's required to establish notability of an article's subject has become generally better understood.  Back then, we couldn't really put a finger on what was a just a gross queasy feeling about this article being an unjustified "vanity article".  But, now we can.  
Those entries (above) appear to be secondary sources that establish notability only of their subjects.  That is, a source doesn't establish notability of its author.  We need sources about our subject itself (Kuhn) to establish and prove notability.  That, we don't got.  Our subject might be notable enough, but if so, we haven't made it clear with adequate refs for that job.
This article has only one or two very weak secondary sources mentioning Kuhn.  Almost all it's sources are non-independent primary sources written by Kuhn himself, they contribute nothing toward establishing the notability required for continued inclusion of this article.
If the subject really is notable enough to have an article about him (he might be), significant and reliable sources that are actually about him (and definitely not by him) must be found and added in.
142.105.159.178 (talk) 00:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary non-independent sources don't establish notability