Talk:Lola Cars

message: Like any entry on cars, this one screams for photos. If anyone could contribute, it would be appreciated! --Navstar 04:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need images 

message: Is there any reason that Lola Racing Cars is located at "Lola"? There are bunch of other equally-notable "Lolas," maybe this should be the disambig page instead of Lola (disambiguation). - AKeen 00:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most significant Lola? 

message: I fully agree that the "lola" page should be a disambig page, but this page is not named correctly. The company name is and always has been "Lola Cars". Either as the stand-alone "Lola Cars Ltd." pre-Birrane, or the "Lola Cars" division of "Lola Group". Please be careful when renaming pages that you do it correctly, as a second rename creates many double-redirects that have to be manually corrected! Pyrope 07:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: I've bumped importance up a notch (low to mid) for F1 on the basis that the Lola-derived Honda RA300 won the 1967 Italian Grand Prix, Surtees took a couple of seconds at the 1962 British Grand Prix and the 1963 German Grand Prix and Aguri Suzuki finished third at the  1990 Japanese Grand Prix. That's three Lola podiums and a win for a sort of Lola. Reasonable? 4u1e (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While I'm here, I'd grade this as 'B' quality: fairly complete, but a bit listy and no refs whatsover. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 16:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well nearly eight years later the standards have changed. I'm going to demote this to Start-Class given it's lack of citations and such. Of course, that does not mean it does not have B-Class potential and beyond, but it does need quite a bit of work. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: I changed a pic on the article to show Lola's first ever car - I think the paragraph should be updated to reflect this but I don't know enough of the history of the company to do this. Parrot of Doom (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lola's first car 

message: Did I miss it? Why was the company named "Lola"?
:The August 2010 issue of Classic Cars magazine and grandprix.com suggest that the company was named after the song "Whatever Lola Wants (Lola Gets)". DH85868993 (talk) 10:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin of the name

message: "Lola resisted making a 'works' Formula One entry for many years, being content to construct cars on behalf of other entrants. Lola's first works entry ..."
I'm not sure what this means? A 'works' car would be one they build themselves and run themselves? they would hire their own drivers, mechanics and so forth?
Feldercarb (talk) 00:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's right. DH85868993 (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  can we explain 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lola Cars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140116105328/http://wsrp.ic.cz/tablemesport.html to http://wsrp.ic.cz/tablemesport.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lola-group.com/newsstory.asp?NewsId=37
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lola Cars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011184932/http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/article/industry-lola-ceases-operations/ to http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/article/industry-lola-ceases-operations/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018211223/http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/article/industry-lola-set-to-continue-under-new-ownership to http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/article/industry-lola-set-to-continue-under-new-ownership/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: > Graham Hill had won the 1966 Indianapolis 500 in a Lola, and Jackie Stewart raced a four-wheel drive Lola there. 
Jackie Stewart NEVER raced one of the 4WD Lolas (i.e. Lola T150/152/153), but he raced the 2WD Lola T90 in 1966 an the T92 in 1967.
Reference:
http://oldracingcars.info/usnc/res.php?s=0&ch=0&d=1042  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.147.165.134 (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lola vs. Indy 500 

message: What does the T stand for? Since the mid 1960s, all models numbers begin with T like Type or Tauranac, or whatever. Matthead (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find any definitive evidence, but my guess is that it's an abbreviation for "Type". DH85868993 (talk) 22:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  T? 

message: Under the heading "Sports cars: 1970s" the second sentence states "...many motorsport fans do not consider the single-seater Formula 5000-based cars..." (emphasis added) This use of weasel-words prompted me to insert a "Who?" template. Can someone please either add some substance to that assertion? Otherwise it should be removed. Thanks. Bricology (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...many motorsports fans..." 

message: Most modern single seaters, barring F1 cars, are not notable on their own. Being of a spec series make it less so. WP:SIGCOV are always thin for those cars, as is WP:N. SpacedFarmer (talk) 17:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - different cars, plenty of ink spilled on them as evidenced by their referencing.  Mr.choppers | ✎  01:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: How are they significantly different? SpacedFarmer (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion