lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flagstaff, Maine

message: Isn't that Wilhelm Reich's estate in Rangeley?  I'm curious as to why this is used as a reference point.  Why not just Rangeley?  If I see no objections (or a valid explanation why this is the case), I'll probably just go ahead and change it to Rangeley. Ripogenus77 21:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orgonon? 
Talk:Bhati Gate

message: i have added some images of bhati gate
The Bhati Gate Lahore area is very famous for its connection to many famous people and its long history, and we can menttion many famous names of people such as Rudyard Kipling, Iqbal the Pakistani poet, Hakim Ahmad Shuja another prominent writer, Agha Hashr the playwright and a dozen more affiliated with or writing about this locality. However, this article does not seem to do justice to it at all. Apart from writing a lot of political promotive stuff about some Pakistani politicians, which bears little or no connection to the topic, the articles writing itself seems to have been picked up in sizable chunks from a well known English translation of Hakim Ahmad Shuja's famous Urdu book of memoirs, Lahore ka Chelsea. And no references are made/given at all i this context, and indeed, there are no references at all. I believe that this article about an important place could be properly developed in time, and should be essentially re-written. 
AsadUK200 (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Richard Oswald

message: Is this the best place to report broken links on Wiki?
https://web.archive.org/web/20160409093406/http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/filmography.html?p_id=105257 It just says the page is not available 
when you click on Biography in the external links section you also get a missing page.
This link:
http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/filmography.html?p_id=105257
2601:1C0:CA00:A1D0:88DE:54C3:C00F:1B5A (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Template talk:Infobox radio station/Infobox radio archive

message: I based this infobox on the Template:Infobox Broadcast originally written by User:Boisemedia for television stations.  Obviously, some categories had to be tweaked for radio stations.  There is currently no project associated with this template; could somebody assist me in starting one?  (Alternatively, help me in associating this with an appropriate existing project.)  SwissCelt 20:58, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 October 16. --Ligulem 21:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect deleted
Talk:Dodge Hornet (concept car)

message: Dodge Hornet is what I'm good at! So I will keep this page up! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Online now (talk • contribs) 21:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm working on it! 

message: Text for this article was taken directly from at least the two following web sites.
*http://www.allpar.com/cars/concepts/dodge/hornet.html
*http://www.conceptcarsnews.com/
-- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article has copyright issues

message: I had never visited the websites listed in the above comment on this talkpage Mufka. I do not know who edited by taking from those sites. If I was the one to bring this mess up, or bring the attention to you about this article, please do not bring it all down on me, because I merely made small adjustments, rather than giant edits. Please, reguarding this, I would like to hear more from you on my talk page. Thank you. Online now 03:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My response is here -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 15:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Copyright Issues 

message: This article has now been rewritten, organized, and expanded. It is not "stub" class. With 18 references for a singular concept car, it seems worthy of a "B" rank. Please modify and add as appropriate to further improve its coverage. Thanks! CZmarlin (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten and organized

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Will go with a DAB page at the base name for now, which can be expanded into a set index later. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dodge Hornet →  – Not a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC due to the release of the production version Dodge Hornet for the 2023 model year.https://www.carscoops.com/2022/08/2023-dodge-hornet-has-italian-looks-and-two-powertrain-options/ The Dodge Hornet article should either be a WP:SIA with links to Dodge Hornet (concept car) and Alfa Romeo Tonale (where the article covers the 2023 Hornet), or as a redirect to Alfa Romeo Tonale if the 2023 Hornet became a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - something that should be discussed further here. Andra Febrian (talk) 09:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Automobiles has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 10:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 August 2022
Talk:Gwilym Lloyd George

message: According to this article in the Journal of Liberal History, http://www.liberalhistory.org.uk/uploads/25_jones_a_breach_in_the_family.pdf , Gwilym used the spelling "Lloyd-George" not "Lloyd George" - "In his new post Lloyd-George (his use of the hyphen was significant)." Should the article be moved to include it? Timrollpickering (talk) 18:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gwilym took to hyphenating his name (unlike his father), although I haven't tracked down when he began to do so.Paulturtle (talk) 03:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ODNB says he began to hyphenate after World War II. Which leads me to wonder: should the article be renamed accordingly? Atchom (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname 
Talk:Digital sundial

message: What, exactly, does this have to do with fractals or fractal geometry? Melchoir 21:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The theorem. Well, can you imagine the set F described there? Normally, it's a fractal. It could be made precise in the article. --Beaumont (@) 21:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not everything complicated is a fractal. Are there sources for the mathematics? What do they say? Melchoir 01:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a classical theorem in the fractal geometry...  See Falconer "Fractal Geometry" cited in the fractal article. I shall copy it here, so thanks for your question. BTW, the current definition of what "fractal" is was inserted there on the basis of this monograph and I guess this is (one of) the best source(s). --Beaumont (@) 08:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, that seems in order. I know this article is a translation, but the redundant "See also" link and the nonexistent category seem a little too breathlessly excited on the fractal issue. I'll fix those up... Melchoir 08:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to fractals 

message: Shouldn't this be merged with Sundial? 124.82.2.241 18:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? This seems quite well separated topic (theoretical basis, technical means) and, eventually, might get expanded here.--Beaumont (@) 20:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Also, a seperate page probably has better marketing potential. 153.2.246.31 23:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Sundial]] 

message: One bit of math looks wrong to me, but I'm out of my field.  Specifically, immediately under the "Theorem" subhead, where it says [0,pi) - this looks like mismatched brackets to me.
"Sockets of optical waveguides" doesn't mean much to me; is "sockets" correct here?
Peter Delmonte 00:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: [0,pi) means the set of numbers between 0 and pi, but the [ indicates that 0 is included in the set, but the ) indicates that pi is not (ie everything from 0 up to but not including pi). – AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 01:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with Math and Text? 

message: There is something to print on https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1068443 .  (although, I not sure it is useful to print the inside)  -- Xofc (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A 3D Printed digital sundial on [[Thingiverse]]
Talk:KARMEN

message: This article is extremely outdated
-KARMEN has stopped operation on July 20th, 2001
-nobody takes the time anomaly seriously anymore (probably neutron background)
-KARMEN's most important results are the exclusion of oscillations in the nu_mu_bar -> nu_e_bar channel within its area of sensitivity. It is thus in conflict with the LSND results, which have now been refuted by the MiniBoone experiment.
So i.m.h.o. this article should either be thoroughly revised or just removed completely.
GenghisDon 07:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oudated

message: What's the role of the Karlsruhe Reseach Center in this? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe]]
Talk:Gyula Andrássy

message: Article states that daughter Ilona (b.1859) married Count Batthyany. The link says that Batthyany was executed Oct 6 1849.````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidney Bung (talk • contribs) 20:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage of Daughter 

message: The village Oláhpatak as place of birth is mentioned insted of Kosice only in very few books. Otberg (talk) 23:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right but the "birthplace" problem is not decided. His other possible birthplace is said to be Oláhpatak, present-day Vlachovo. Fakirbakir (talk) 23:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: But the acticle mentions just Oláhpatak. --Otberg (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:Tortoiseshell

message: Feel free to fix the section up if you find that it needs it. --LifeEnemy 21:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to at some point. I generally find that tagging things is better than just sticking them on my watchlist, it means that it's flagged for everyone then. Chris Cunningham 13:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV section
Talk:Abushiri

message: http://www.ntz.info/gen/n00954.html
http://www.savageandsoldier.com/articles/africa/GermanWars.html
http://www.bagamoyo.com/famous_sights.html
http://www.bagamoyo.com/history_bagamoyo+M5bb747ce2ec.html
http://www.omanisilver.com/contents/en-us/d240.html
http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001/acref-9780195382075-e-0400
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/walter.sauer/Publikationen-Dateien/Colonial_Exploration_and_East_African_Resistance.pdf
http://books.google.com/books?id=_eJ6AAAAQBAJ&pg=PT227&dq=bushiri+ibn+salim&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VYl4Uq_-I9TKsQSetIGwAg&ved=0CFUQ6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=bushiri%20ibn%20salim&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=yF5KZPlooGIC&pg=PA203&dq=bushiri+ibn+salim&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4d4UvyiFfTfsATG04DYAQ&ved=0CC8Q6wEwAA#v=onepage&q=bushiri%20ibn%20salim&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=R44VRnNCzAYC&pg=PA113&dq=bushiri+ibn+salim&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VYl4Uq_-I9TKsQSetIGwAg&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q=bushiri%20ibn%20salim&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=H2qmAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA17&dq=bushiri+ibn+salim&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4d4UvyiFfTfsATG04DYAQ&ved=0CFkQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=bushiri%20ibn%20salim&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=kMHmx89a-2wC&pg=PA18&dq=bushiri+ibn+salim&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k4d4UvyiFfTfsATG04DYAQ&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=bushiri%20ibn%20salim&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=k1YYAAAAIAAJ&q=bushiri+ibn+salim&dq=bushiri+ibn+salim&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VYl4Uq_-I9TKsQSetIGwAg&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBTgK
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Milktaco (talk • contribs)  20:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Hank Scott

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Heidijane 11:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:KEKB (accelerator)

message: I'm no expert, but it seems that this high ammount of particle production is connected to the high lumminosity attained by this accelerator. In fact, it even looks like this was the first accelerator in history to attain a certain important level of lumminosity (10^32/cm.s ?).  Does anybody know more about that subject? It should be mentioned, if this is really a "first"  from KEKB. -- NIC1138 23:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumminosity
Talk:H. Clay Van Voorhis

message: best guess is we need the prefix van as he used it as part of his name during his life, removal of the prefix was once quite common and has had a very real tendancy to cause confusion when it's lack occurs in documents, especially of historical figures, I don't know of any of his family (during modern times) who didn't use the prefix, so I think we really ought to keep it attachedJohn5Russell3Finley 03:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lazarus effect

message: The german link is incorrect. It links to Lazarus taxon rather than Lazarus effect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.112.134.32 (talk) 02:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

message: In reading about the tragic child, Jahi McMath, who was recently declared brain dead, she seems to be having some type of clonic jerking that the family interprets as continued life while 'Net commentators say it's the Lazarus effect and a very ominous sign. Since I know better than to rely on "Netxperts", I came here (at least to peer-policed Netxperts), but this article doesn't mention how the LE relates to human bodies. Am I missing something? Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ha! The 'Net posters made a slight mistake - it's Lazarus syndrome, not Lazarus effect, though from the article, it was a welcome event by the families involved, not ominous. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing in the hands of 'Net posters. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lazarus Effect on human bodies?
Talk:Meteos: Disney Magic

message: This page needs a major update! The game has already been released, unfortunately, I don't own the game. But hopefully someone with more knowledge can have it updated.
: I don't own the game (frankly because I'm a Meteos purist), but I added a couple of reviews.Leemorrison 18:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Left–right symmetry

message: I think this article should really be merged into Parity (physics) - I believe they are talking about the same concepts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Braddodson (talk • contribs) 03:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No to merge.  This is merely one aspect of parity. --Michael C. Price talk 21:36, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I've added a rider that the Z boson already couples to right handed fermions.  I presume the Z' boson couples to left-handed fermions?  Someone had better check.  -- cheers, Michael C. Price talk 04:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Z and Z'
Talk:Leptoquark

message: How about merging Leptoquarks and X and Y bosons just like in german Wikipedia?--Ernsts (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  X and Y bosons 

message: In the definition/description "given a generation" in "that carry information between quarks and leptons given a generation and allowing quarks and leptons to interact" is unclear. Perhaps it should be "of a given generation"? PJTraill (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition/description unclear 

message: Several kinds of leptoquarks, depending on their electric charge, can be considered:
*Q=5/3: Such a LQ decays into up-type quarks (u2/3, c2/3, t2/3) and charged leptons (e−, μ−, τ−).
*Q=2/3: LQ decays into up-type quarks and neutrinos (or antineutrinos), and/or to down-type quarks (d−1/3, s−1/3, b−1/3) and charged leptons.
*Q=−1/3: LQ decays into down-type quarks and (anti)neutrinos, and/or to up-type quark and a charged antilepton.
*Q=−4/3: LQ decays into down-type quarks and charged antileptons.
Am I missing something, or is this reversing leptons and antileptons? An up-type quark + a charged lepton would be  + -1 = -, while an up-type quark plus a charged antilepton would be  + 1 = . I'm going to edit this section XinaNicole (talk) 04:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typology
Talk:LHCb experiment

message: Is it 'b-hadron' or 'B hadron'?  Both spellings are used. RJFJR (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty sure it's b-hadron. b-hadron is short for "bottom quark containing hadron" (so-named after the symbol of the bottom quark, b). "B hadron" is confusing at best, as many would think "do you mean a B meson?" since mesons are hadrons. It's possible that some use "B hadron" for "bottomness/beauty-containing hadron" (B or B′ being the symbol for bottomness), but that's just awful and confusing. Either way, b-hadron is better. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: b vs B
Talk:Amiexpress

message: As to why Joseph Hodge gave up on AmiExpress/Millenium probably because of the amount of rogue copies that were available back in the day. Maybe it was a dislike for the communications area that /X existed in - it was extremely popular within the warez scene. If your board wasn't running AmiExpress or clone - you weren't taken seriously. Coderman 21:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the end of AmiExpress
Talk:Hadacol

message: The sentence 'One of the tonic's unusual ingredients, "Diluted Acid Hydrochloric", is what is known as a "hydrochloric wash": a heavily diluted form of the acid that opens the arteries and allows the body's quicker absorption of the other ingredients, including the 12 percent alcohol "preservative".' should be removed, stated as an advertising claim if that is what it was, or referenced if there is as factual basis.Drienstra (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I can find no reliable source - whether objective or as promotional claim - for the existence of this "hydrochloric wash". Gordonofcartoon (talk) 18:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hydrochloric wash

message: Dudley Leblanc was a contestant on "You Bet Your Life", broadcast on February 28, 1951.  The episode is available on DVD, in "Groucho Marx, You Bet Your Life.  The Lost Episodes." (Disc 1).  Leblanc extolls the virtue of campaigning in French, tells a joke in French-Louisiana dialect. In response to Groucho's question "What is Hadacol good for", Leblanc answers, "Last year it was good for 5 million dollars".TriangleShirtwaist 15:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch Leblanc on Groucho Marx television program 

message: The reference to "Hadacol Bounce" being put out or written by Professor Longhair is incorrect. Bill Nettles, wrote and recorded Hadacol Boogie and also wrote and recorded "Hadacol Bounce". However, Professor Longhair did perform and record this song, but Bill Nettles is the Composer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.170.223.117 (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Hadacol Bounce

message: According to Bob Cox's version: Legend has it that when asked why he called it Hadacol, LeBlanc responded, "Well, I hadda call it something."  In other words, Bob Cox's account doesn't parenthesize the word 'hadacol' in the middle of the quoted sentence. So I think our version would be more clear without the parenthesis. EdJohnston (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Hadacol got its name 

message: What indications are there that Hadacol's alcohol content would be of more interest to Southerners than any other part of the country?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papabill1945 (talk • contribs) 06:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional assumptions, anyone? 

message: It would be nice to see a few dates in here, so we can place the Hadacol phenomenon in context: when it was developed, when it was first marketed, when it reached its peak, and so on. 2604:2000:EFC0:105:3C00:C9B0:8E77:C421 (talk) 14:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: The brief section does nothing to explain what Hadacol Caravan was, and the links otherwise in wikipedia (like Hank Williams page) lead only here. Can somebody expand on that? 2A01:4B00:D307:A400:8070:4BCA:7125:B6CF (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What WAS a Hadacol Caravan?
Talk:Benedetta Carlini

message: Let's get this straight. At 30, she became abbess; then the church discovered she and another nun were lovers, and she was kept under guard for the next 50 years. 30+50=80. But she lived 1591-1661. So she was 70 years old when she died. Can't be. According to the publisher's weekly review of the book Immodest Acts which you can read on the Amazon page for the book (http://www.amazon.com/Immodest-Acts-Renaissance-History-Sexuality/dp/0195042255
) "Carlini lost her position and was imprisoned for 35 years."
- Gripdamage 22:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in timeline 

message: The internal link towards Nominalism has no explanation of the relevance of Nominalism to theology.
Maybe the Carlini article should better explain how Nominalism played a role here?41.219.31.19 (talk) 06:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominalism 

message: Given Sister Bartolomea's testimony was given under threat of imprisonment, how can it be considered in any way trustworthy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.173.128.34 (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: All testimony has the threat of imprisonment behind it, what are you talking about?Crun31 (talk) 09:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sexual Abuse"

message: Needs heavy redaction and edit 2600:1700:A610:1000:E460:37FE:6803:BD71 (talk) 04:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not up to snuff. 

message: There is no evidence that the black dog article linked has anything to do with Benedetta's experience. The article is about an English legend. A Wikilink here is not appropriate as there is no apparent tie in. Maybe it should be referenced in a footnote.Dr. Grampinator (talk) 06:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My point was that this article did not explain the relevance of that particular instance. I'll put it back, but you should consider fixing either the Benedetta explanation or the black dog article.Dr. Grampinator (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, on both counts. Thanks for working with me on this. Kevin Hallward's Ghost (Let's talk) 20:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Dog
Talk:Pontefract (UK Parliament constituency)

message: As well as adding a list of post-1885 MPs, I have just amended the creation dates for the constituency, because Rayment does not record the constituency as having been abolished in 1918 and recreated in 1950 (see diff: he records it as having uninterrupted existence in that period. Rayment is not infallible, so if anyone has another source, please cite! --BrownHairedGirl (talk)  • (contribs) 22:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  creation dates 