Talk:New River, Arizona

message: The "History" section of this article seems to have been written by someone with an agenda of opposing new development and the expansion of Phoenix and its planned suburbs. Several sentences are written with passive-agressive statements about "the future of the rural character" of New River and so on.
Wikipedia is not the place for this. Darkest tree (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality problems 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :New River, Arizona's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "gnis":
From Glendale, Arizona: 
From Wranglers Roost Stagecoach Stop: 
From Gavilan Peak (Arizona): 
From Salt River (Arizona): 
From Marinette, Arizona: 
From Tolleson, Arizona: 
From Theba, Arizona: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:New River, Arizona]] 

message: Some IPs (could be the same editor) is attempting to delete the section on incorporation (which is referenced) and is replacing with unreferenced information.  Attempts to get them to discuss on the Talk Page has failed.  Clearly, this is a controversial issue in the town.  I have requested page protection to prevent disruptive editing and force proper discussion on this section. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2019: Request Page Protection 

message: I noticed on passing an issue on the Website parameter of the infobox but I am at first glance far from convinced the associated website represents the settlement officially so I have left it broken but at some point it needs to be watched and sorted:
* Can someone confirm an official website non-controversial website for the settlement.  The infobox broken Website parameter claims nrdhca.org and I have qualms if this is full justified. (it might be)? Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Official website of settlement

message: Discussed previously I observe North Phoenix News (waybacked url shown) would seem to be a middlingly reliable source at first glance if someone wishes to update the article.  (I'm not).  Thanks.  Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . nice one. Britishfinance (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporation plan end 

message: This article is on my watchlist ... and I was concerned about a recent IP edit regarding as far as I can make out Epcor in the Government section.   I looked at this around 06:00 UTC and wondered if I should revert it or require a citation or otherwise template.  I have chosen to mark the problem statements as citation needed as the minimum needed however a different solution may be appropriate.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epcor in government section