lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gridiron Club

message: Citing RS from April 9 and April 10, the article says:
The 2022 dinner on April 2 became a COVID superspreader event when at least 72 people tested positive, including Attorney General Merrick Garland, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.
Based on an April 8 article,  twice added to the article "No cases of serious illness resulted from the dinner."
IMO, that phrasing overstates the source cited, which quotes one attendee saying "so far" no serious cases were reported:
So far, there are no reports of any symptoms more serious than a sore throat or mild fever, said Tom DeFrank, a contributing editor for National Journal and president of the Gridiron Club.
One would need a later source, and a stronger statement to support B007's phrasing. Per BRD, I removed that claim and ask for consensus before restoring it. HouseOfChange (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you seriously making the argument that an encyclopedia (which is supposed to report truth) should choose what to include or not include based on potential social consequences?  Bueller 007 (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Glad to see B007 accepted the change to "as of April 8." HouseOfChange (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:BRD "No cases of serious illness resulted from the dinner."
Talk:Grigoris Arnaoutoglou

message: eimai  θαυμαστρια σου να περνασ καλα καλο καλοκαιρι . ΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΙΑ ΠΟΛΑΤΟΥ  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.119.74 (talk) 15:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   ANASTASIA
Talk:Walk It Out (Unk song)

message: I'm sorry, but the dance that is listed on the Walk It Out article doesn't seem notable. It's from MTV yes, but it seems like a private website that is not supposed to be on wikipedia. By private I mean it's not encyclopedic to include it here. ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the dance?
Talk:Kim Komando/Archive 1

message: The content in this edit and this edit need to be merged. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 04:42, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 04:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Since Kim doesn't trust Wikipedia, I find it hard to trust her.  She seems like an advertising arm of Microsoft and associated products. Her show deals almost exclusively with Windows users.  Her advice is dubious.  She tends promote consumerism, rather than sustainability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.67.12.44 (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please keep the discussion on-topic.  This talk page is here to discuss the article and not the subject of the article. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 22:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim Komando -- I don't trust her 

message: IRelayer added an advert tag as a "minor" edit on Janaury 30, 2007.  I have removed it.  First of all, adding an article tag is never minor.  The editor should explain the reason for the addition of this tag to this article.  This article is accurate and sourced and, in my opinion, every generally positive article is not advertising.  I spent a few minutes looking for material on the Web that might add something to the article and couldn't find any. patsw 18:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert tag 

message: If you are going to bring up the subject, isn't Komando's reason(s) arguing the proposed Sirius/XM merger would be bad for consumers part of the story as well as Stern's speculations on her motivations for doing so? patsw 02:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellite radio controversy 

message: Should a disclaimer be put on the page with something like the following statement?
Kim Komando has said negative things about Wikipedia on her nationally syndicated radio show. She has suggested not participating in Wikipedia. We at Wikipedia will endeavor to remain non point of view regarding her activities.
Billnotgatez 22:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no policy for such as disclaimer and I would expect it to be deleted on sight.  Komando has every right to say "negative things" about the Wikipedia.  The question is whether her opinion has any significance to be included in her biographical article in this encyclopedia.  By the way, there is no "we at the Wikipedia."  Each editor speaks for himself or herself. patsw 02:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimer 

message: Thanks for in the info, but where's its verifiability?  Who are the critics?  Who are the "noters" of the critics?  Is undue weight being given here to her opinions on open source?  I tried but couldn't find a primary source (i.e. Komando herself being critical of open source), or a secondary source critical of Komando being critical of open source.
She has called Wikipedia a "failure" 'Nuff said. Telepheedian 19:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who "noted" whose criticism of Kommando?
Talk:Gulam Noon, Baron Noon

message: This article was classified as a stub in 2012. The article has since been upgraded so that in my view it meets a start classification. Capitalistroadster (talk) 00:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Gungunum

message: So for the list of rulers under Larsa in the Kings of Isin-Larsa template at the bottom of this article, currently it shows:
*Naplanum
*Emisum
*Samium
*Zabaia
*Gungunum
*Abisare
Gungunum's reign is given as 1932 to 1906 BC (middle chronology acc. to the footnote). His predecessor in the list (Zabaia) ruled from 1877 to 1868 BC (short chronology) and the successor (Abisare) ruled from 1841 to 1830 BC (short chronology).
If we subtract 64 from both dates for Gungunum (following the pattern of the formula given on the short chronology WP page), we get 1868 and 1842, which would be short chronology dates and would but him properly in between Zabaia and Abisare; so it looks like he is correctly placed, but I wanted to ask if it's appropriate to add short chronology dates into the article for Gungunum itself; this would add clarity and help align with other articles that use both chronologies. Suggestions welcome--FeanorStar7 (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Another problem, however, is that if we keep the middle chronology dates in the Gungunum article, it appears he is a 20th century BC ruler and not a 19th century one as his predecessor and successor are, according to the short chronology... is it better to leave things as they are or align the others to the middle chronology, which is more academically accepted?
I have also put this section in the talk page of the template
--FeanorStar7 (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronological sorting issue
Talk:Watts Bar Nuclear Plant

message: The article refers to a core damage frequency as estimated in the agency study, and gives [14] and [15] as the source. Can somebody show me in the study cited where that number comes from?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.101.124.26 (talk) 19:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It comes from the NBC News source: "24. Watts Bar 1, Spring City, Tenn.: 1 in 27,778 chance each year. Old estimate: 1 in 178,571. Change in risk: 543 percent." I assume this is based on the SCDF tables in appendix D of the report, but I don't really think NBC is a reliable source for interpreting this data. Their number obviously has false precision for example. Kendall-K1 (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: estimate of core damage frequency
Talk:Michael Andrews (artist)

message: This is really just a stub. It tells me virtually nothing outside of external references.
Dirk 00:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gurju Khatun

message: I know we have a coin, but a portrait would be preferable. Asarelah (talk) 15:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Narrowly a Start class.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 05:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Guy D'Artois

message: This was a highly distinguished couple. Mrs. d'Artois was herself a commissioned, parachute-trained and decorated veteran of special operations! There is already an article on Mrs. d'Artois (ASO Butt, MBE), but unlike the real people, the articles have yet to be married up.
Protozoon (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Memphis Storm

message: FORWARDS 
*Shawn Allen, Christian Brothers University
*Neil Brunetz, Rhodes College
*Michael Gaither, University of Virginia
*Scott Grant, Memphis State
*Dustin Hornsby, Germantown Fury soccer club
*Bernard Licari, Memphis State
*John Mulrooney, Christian Brothers High
*Alejandro Pereira, Christian Brothers University. 
DEFENDERS 
*Brian Briske, Christian Brothers University
*Tony Carbognani, New York Cosmos, Memphis Rogues , Memphis Storm
*Brent Jordan, Memphis State
*Ricki Morris, Memphis State
*Brady Whitworth, Memphis Rogues, Memphis Storm
*Butch Whitworth, Memphis State
*Scott Spencer, Memphis State. 
MIDFIELDERS 
*Clint Browne, Memphis State
*Alper Cetingok, Rhodes College
*Russell Church, Memphis State
*Daniel De Vall, Bartlett Rangers soccer club
*Jimmy Hink, Memphis State
*John Norris, Memphis State
*Keith Stirrup, Sheffield (England) Wednesday club
*Juan Yepez, Memphis Rogues, Memphis Storm. 
GOALKEEPERS 
* Daniel Gonzalez (coach), Canton Invaders, Fort Lauderdale Strikers, LaSalle College (Argentina)
* Brandon Sartain, Germantown Fury soccer club
* Jon Walker, Christian Brothers High.
Mohrflies (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1994 roster
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Nashville

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision

message: * Specific text to be added or removed: 
remove 75 priests and add 103 priests
remove 70 deacons and add 91 deacons
remove 34 seminarians and add 20 seminarians
remove 53 parishes and add 59 churches
* Reason for the change: those were the 2016 numbers, these are the 2021 numbers.
* References supporting change: https://www.nashvocations.org/who-we-are/the-next-generation https://dioceseofnashville.com/find-a-church/ Bill.staley998 (talk) 20:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your request, it will be reviewed in due course. Please see your user talk page for information on required formal disclosures you must make. 331dot (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Partly done:  I changed the count of churches and the number of seminarians with the links you gave. I did not see the priest and deacon counts in my few quick minutes of searching Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Partly done:  I misspoke last night, I did not actually change the seminarians number, but using your source I count 24 not 20, so that is what I have changed it to for now, please feel free to let me know if I did that wrong (Tag @) Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Numbers
Talk:WYCZ

message: I'm going to dispute the assertion that this station is a "clear channel" radio station.  Clear Channel stations (like WBZ in Boston on this frequency) are class A stations that typically are licensed at 50 kW and do not reduce power at night (although they may switch to a directional antenna)...  Also the station ownership is out of date.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 19:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

message: There doesn't seem to be any evidence that the AM side (1030 AM) is still in operation.  Does anyone have verifiable information regarding this? 2600:1004:B172:33CD:0:5:8113:401 (talk) 14:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  AM now dark?
Talk:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

message: This article has been flagged (by @HapHaxion I believe) for containing content that is written like an advertisement. I work for the Lincoln Institute and will therefore not edit the page directly, but I would suggest tweaking the introductory section so that it doesn't as closely resemble the organization's website. The Lincoln Institute is a nonprofit think tank based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, that works on issues related to land use, land based financing, and land conservation. There are plenty of external sources to cite in relation to various aspects of the institute's work. The following are just a few examples. I'd be happy to answer questions.
https://www.governing.com/finance/controversial-tool-helping-fund-chicagos-long-awaited-rail-extension
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/23/business/next-30-days-could-help-decide-future-development-near-public-transit-massachusetts/
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/18/realestate/home-buyer-risks-bad-credit-savings.html
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/12/upshot/cities-grew-safer-police-budgets-kept-growing.html
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/12/upshot/cities-grew-safer-police-budgets-kept-growing.html
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/3/22/cambridge-forum-danielle-allen/ Cornerstone2898 (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested edits so this article doesn't read like an advertisement
Talk:WildBlue

message: There is some minor bias in this article. It needs more NPOV. 138.88.6.132 16:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a note, bias has been mostly fixed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Sympathetic string

message: Content merged in from resonant strings April 29, 2007. Interwiki links are to both resonant strings and sympathetic string. -- phoebe/(talk)  01:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

message: "Many people have said to me that this [the ten-string guitar] is the same principle as that used for the viola d'amore . . . . But there was a problem with that instrument: the tuning - of both the bowed strings above and the sympathetic strings below was [centred on the tones of D, A, and F] and the F was either sharp or natural, depending on whether the key of the piece was D major or D minor. Thus, when you played a D, you had not only the sound of that one string, but also the sound of all the other Ds on the instrument, so you had a very big D! But, when you played G, for example, you had absolutely nothing in the way of resonance. My idea of the 10-string guitar is exactly the contrary - to provide sympathetic vibration for the notes that do not have this kind of reinforcement on a normal 6-string guitar." (Yepes 1978: 46)
Yepes, Narciso. 1978. "The 10-String Guitar: Overcoming the Limitations of Six Strings". Interview by Larry Snitzler. Guitar Player 12(3): pp. 26, 42, 46, 48, 52.
Viktor van Niekerk (talk) 03:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That being the case, how about if we omit mention of the viola d'amore in this context, and simply say that Yepes' instrument was designed to use sympathetics to balance the instrument across its compass, or something like that? +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, which is exactly why I removed the reference to viola d'amore. Problem solved? Viktor van Niekerk (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Narciso Yepes on the viola d'amore

message: The string resonance article currently only describes the specific process of "sympathetic string resonance" (strings indirectly vibrating due to other vibrating strings), and not the more general "string resonance" (the underlying mechanism of all string instruments). This is probably because the terms "resonance" and "sympathetic resonance" are often conflated in casual musical contexts, even though resonance describes a much broader phenomenon. Concretely, all strings undergo resonance to produce sound, and the pitch of the sound is the resonant frequency. In certain instances this may cause sympathetic resonance, but not always. Also, the section "Overtones due to string resonance on the koto" should probably be omitted from the merge as it's too specific for either topic and would probably fit better in string harmonics (if anywhere) 30103db (talk) 20:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge: [[String resonance]] → Sympathetic string
Talk:Zain al-Din al-'Iraqi

message: This entry is poorly written. It seems the author is attempting to say that Iraqi authored an original takhreej to Ihyaa and then abridged it. The word takhreej needs an explanation not a simple attempt at translation. There are many other notable works by Iraqi that could have been mentioned in addition, for example his thousand word poem expaining hadith terminology. I am deleting the statement regarding the absence of 'false' hadith in Ihyaa as this is simply untrue. The exact statement I just removed from the text of the article is: [proving that there not a single false hadith in Ghazali’s work.] I picked up my copy of Ihyaa and, flipping through a few pages, happened upon a number of weak, daif hadith, one munkar hadith and another with a liar, kathaab, in its chain of narration - a strong indication that the hadith is fabricated and just before that a hadith Iraqi classified as La Asla lahu - no basis for it - meaning it is not a hadith at all having no source to qualify it as such. (This was found on page 325 of the first volume of the Dar al-Hadith printing from Cairo.) The word false could reasonably apply to a number of hadith classifications - Each of the above mentioned classiafications from daif to munkar could conceivably qualify for being 'false', maudu', fabricated and 'no basis' certainly so. Supertouch (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Richard Diebenkorn

message: Perhaps we only need one Ocean Park painting? --Knulclunk 01:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flight of the Red Balloon

message: The movie is nowhere to be found on the reference next to the TSPDT statement. 84.194.175.102 (talk) 07:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference 
Talk:South American Plate

message: The article on Laterite soils refers to the abundance of laterites on the South American Shield, but various articles (eg, Guiana Shield, Río de la Plata) list a variety of important cratons on the South American Plate. Perhaps a future edit could list distinctly, the shield areas currently recognised in the region? Aboctok (talk) 12:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cratons in South America 

message: I reverted your addition because it sounds like it might be a quote from the study you cited, which would be a copyright violation (even though it's a translation). I saved the content you added here.
The South American Plate in its northern part, subducted below the Caribbean Plate in its eastern boundary, this colliding plates created the Caribbean Island Arc. In the southern boundary of the Caribbean Plate has a dextral lateral transcurrent boundary mainly. By comparing the relative displacement with the Caribbean Plate, we found that the South American Plate moves westwards 21 mm/year faster. Deiros D (2000) Determination of Displacement Between Caribbean and South American plates in Venezuela using Global Positioning System (GPS) data. Geological Code of Venezuela. 
It's that "we" that is problematic. — Gorthian (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure of copyright status 
Talk:Yedidia Shofet

message: Hello. I am moving this unreferenced quotation to this talkpage, until a reference is found:
:"Replacing Hacham Yedidia is impossible. The closest we can come to him is his very able son, Rav David Shofet, who has dedicated his life to Iranian Jewry like his father did," said Andy Abrishami, a Nessah board member and the elder Shofet's son-in-law. "It's hard to be a rabbi under any circumstances, especially when you're a rabbi for Iranian Jews, because their expectations are much higher, but he [David Shofet], with his humility and dedication, has captured the Iranian Jews' favor."
Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced quotation 

message: I am moving this unreferenced quotation until a reference can be found:
:"We had many rabbis, teachers and hachamim in Iran, but he was the most open minded and most beloved of them all," Yahid said. "He was even respected by the most fanatic Islamic clerics in Iran who did not have friendships with Jews—all because of his gentleness and humility," said Ebrahim Yahid, a close colleague of Shofet."
Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another unreferenced quotation 

message: Again, I am moving this here until we can find a reference...
:"At his funeral, Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel, Ovadiah Yosef, referred to Hakham Shofet as the "Prince of Torah.""
Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third unreferenced quotation
Talk:Arabian Plate

message: The boundary line between the Arabian and African plates on the given maps on both pages is so wide that it completely covers (Israel/Palestine), which is to say that you can't actually see on which plate(s) (Israel/Palestine) sits. Why is that? Hmm... 2607:FEA8:BFA0:BD0:957E:F3AC:DE60:4574 (talk) 03:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity for ambiguity's sake? 

message: Al GPS trackers shown on the NASA site show a NE movement, very much in synch with the African plate. Most are in Israël, but the one near Bagdad is also showing this direction. So only a small difference with the Eurasian plate remains (that one is slightly more easterly). This does make me wonder what is forcing the Anatolian plate to the west? 
So there must be something more going on in northern Iraq and Syria, where no such data excist. If that area is really moving north, would that not mean there is a another microplate on the move over there (say roughly the area to the northeast of Homs)? Or can a part of a microplate move independently? Is there somebody who has hard data about this poorly understood area?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codiv (talk • contribs) 13:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPS data shows only NE movement
Talk:George Adam Scott/to do

message: *Needs sidebar or infobox.
* 1 Biography
         o 1.1 Early life
         o 1.2 Marriage and children
         o 1.3 Occupation section expanded description
         o 1.4 Political life expanded description
* 2 Philosophical and/or political views
* 3 Notes
* 4 Works
         o 4.1 Published works
         o 4.2 Letters
* 5 Awards
Needs external links and picture.SriMesh | talk 01:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections
Talk:Baltimore Bullets (1944–1954)

message: The Hoopedia web site claims to have the logo of the original Bullets franchise here. -- Pemilligan (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the previously displayed image in this article (up until a few hours ago) was of the logo from 1963-1969 for the current Wizards organization (then the Baltimore Bullets).  This article did once display the correct logo, but the underlying image was speedily deleted due to unclear copyright status and the link to the image was removed back in September of 2007:  — Myasuda (talk) 00:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: We identify Baltimore as 1945 finalist (defeated by Philadelphia), 1946 champion (beat Philadelphia), and 1947 finalist in the American Basketball League (1925–55). And we say of 1947 champion Toronto "Won forfeit, Baltimore Bullets could not play finals".
--P64 (talk) 20:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1945, 1946, 1947
Talk:Nazca Plate

message: I added a bit about the so-called "Darwin Gap" based on a Feb 7 article in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/science/08quake.html). I'm not sure I put it in the best section of the article.
Bloody Viking (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin Gap