lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Augustus Pablo

message: I removed two categories from this article: Category:Rock musicians and Category:Vocalists. I have never heard Pablo sing and never playing rock music either. Teklund 4 July 2005 10:16 (UTC)
Pablo sang the lead track from "Earth's Rightful Ruler".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.180.190 (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: I (low_stress) requested that a citation be added regarding Pablo's supposed death from "Collapsed Lung."  This is a frequent criticism and attribution of Rastas, Reggae Artists, and Cannabis smokers.  But unless you have primary evidence to back up this claim, I see this as an attempt to create and/or further the confusion and negative rumors about RASTAFARI culture, REGGAE Culture, and cannabis culture.  Please provide direct evidence.  I will be checking out other reggae artists to verify if this is a negative trend!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Low stress (talk • contribs) 18:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a ref. Wwwhatsup (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He was clearly a sick man and there is no implication that his illness or early death was caused by cannabis use. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of death

message: I added an image of the cover art, but I'm sure a better image could be found. As I'm not too sure on the whole Fair Use thing this will have to do for now. Elliot2005 17:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a better image on the Italian wiki. #29 (talk) 07:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nice pic. But one has to wonder if that isn't a copyvio - there is no evident permission from Peter Simon. Wwwhatsup 05:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Should there not be some mention that it was Glen Adams that first recorded under the name Augustus Pablo? Wwwhatsup 05:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Glen Adams

message: Why is the 2008 release of a box set notable enough for inclusion, it actually reads like spam for Shanachie Records. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was a major retrospective, authorized including video. Notable in that respect. I also think there's no harm in mentioning the kids, but in less flowery terms. However I won't make an issue out of it. Wwwhatsup (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Huge amounts of his music available online. I fully agree about melodica and have moved to opening. I also added him to the Melodica article. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 18:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I maintain a major retrospective boxset, including video, is notable, but I leave it to others. I've taken out 'seminal' and "to wide acclaim' in the dub album descriptions. It does seem that a phrase remarking on the considerable influence of these albums on the contemporary dub genre should be included - it's a question of finding a good source. Wwwhatsup (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ipoh white coffee

message: What does this mean? what is locally?
 The term "white coffee" originates from the literal translation of its Chinese name, which was introduced in the 19th century by Chinese migrants who came to work in the local tin mines.[citation needed]
--202.6.153.16 (talk) 06:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Who came to work locally" 

message: Hi there!
The article on the second quotation, "Determination Of Coffee Content In Coffee Mixtures", says at the introduction:
"Almost all coffees produced in Malaysia are coffee
mixtures comprising of roasted coffee, sugar,
margerine and wheat."
So it's not about roasting coffee with other things, it's about the mixture sold to consumers! Coffee is roasted dark or light and then stuff is added later to create a mixture!
How about the white coffee? Is it a better mixture with coffee or is it coffee really roasted with some additive?
Márcio.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcio.mrfc (talk • contribs) 18:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roast with sugar and additives???
Talk:1979 Red River Valley tornado outbreak

message: Looking at the data from NOAA and the TornadoHistoryProject pages, the outbreak was spread over two days as shown here. The Mississippi Valley also had the outbreak on the 11th    --JForget 04:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Outbreak is over two days

message: I moved the article named "Red River Valley Tornado Outbreak" to "Red River Valley tornado outbreak" IAW Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 23:09, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: A substantial portion of the Wichita Falls section needs a re-write.  Appears to be taken from a book or some other source as a recounted memory of the tornado.  Some of the facts seem rather unlikely, especially the tornado width, which would tie or exceed the current record width, if true.  Perhaps usage of more objective sources, like the National Weather Service, would improve this section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slincoln (talk • contribs) 02:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wichita Falls section needs work

message: The links to the storm event information at the Norman forecast office were broken due to a change on their website.  They are fixed now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steppedleader (talk • contribs) 03:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference links 
Talk:Tempel 1

message: How do they know that Tempel 1's origin is the solar system? --Abdull 5 July 2005 14:59 (UTC)
:While not certain, the probablility that an interstellar rogue comet body would 1) pass thru the solar system and 2) be captured by the sun's gravity and go into orbit are very small. HammerFilmFan (talk) 22:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: The sidebar "infobox" states dimensions are 7.6×4.9 km, but in the paragraph just below the sidebar it states 9P/Tempel is "believed to be 14 by 4 kilometers".Mvsmith (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in dimensions 

message: What? This is a periodic Jupiter-family comet!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by УмныйПёс (talk • contribs) 11:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 40.7 hr Rotation period != 5.5 yr Orbital period -- Kheider (talk) 11:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotation period = 40.7 hours???
Talk:Rob Hirst

message: There have been numerous edits, all coming from very similar IP addresses, putting false and unreferenced information about Rob Hirt's personal life.  The current version is referenced with a recent article which confirms Rob's family situation.  The changes being made are extremely inappropriate.SnapMcCrackle (talk) 13:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life Changes 
Talk:Diehard tests

message: I've based this largely on the descriptions in Marsaglia's C code, which I don't understand too well. I would be obliged if some statistician would rewrite the descriptions more accurately. Tualha 4 July 2005 12:22 (UTC)
------
"Collectively they are considered one of the most stringent such tests known". This is sadly no longer true. They are good tests and still worth doing, but there are tougher ones available now. The main problem is that Diehard tests only about 11megabytes of data. As some modern applications use as much as several terabytes of random data, Diehard might not be able to detect large-scale patterns that are important to some people. Just off the top of my head, more stringent tests include NIST, SPRNG, L'Ecuyer, gjrand, and probably heaps of others. This is not supposed to belittle Marsaglia. Diehard is a big improvement on what was easily available before, and the newer tougher tests are all to some extent inspired by Diehard. 203.164.223.250 01:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Would if be beneficial to add a brief example of an expected or typical test result for a random number generation program for each test? Is such data available?
JackStonePGD (talk) 17:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In my view, no. The result of running the test will typically be "Pass", or something like "Fail on tests 2, 3, and 7". Maproom (talk) 06:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expected Results 

message: Diehard is a battery... of tests.  Is this an intentional pun referencing the Diehard brand of car batteries?  Either way, I think it's amusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.112.10 (talk) 21:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intentional pun? 

message: What is the distribution of occurrences that this vague and deliberately uninformative statement is made?
50.35.97.238 (talk) 20:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A certain distribution"
Talk:White Rabbit (disambiguation)

message: white rabbit is also the name of an emilianna torrini song —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.49.219 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Torrini

message: I don't appreciate your "Undid revision 173000971 by Weasel5i2 (talk)never heard of them - out it goes" edit of this article.  I believe that it goes against everything Wikipedia is about, which is the sharing of knowledge by MULTIPLE individuals.
Obviously, by your Undo action, you consider YOUR knowledge to be the de facto standard for everyone else's knowledge.  Did it ever even occur to you to check Google and verify the existence of the fact which I placed in the article? Apparently not. 
Incidentally, I've never heard of the indie rock band, "White Rabbits" from NYC. That doesn't mean I even remotely consider myself as having the authority to remove it from the article! You need to think twice before doing things.  I'm afraid to look at your contribs because I might find all sorts of other innocent bits of info which you indiscriminately removed because you "haven't heard of them"!
For starters, try this on for size. Note the first result returned: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22airplane+crashers%22
Weasel5i2 (talk) 09:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Marcus22 

message: Speedy close as move request from disruptive user (see contribution history). --RegentsPark (talk) 02:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move (September 2010) 

message: White Rabbit (disambiguation) →  — Relisting per Talk:White Rabbit (disambiguation)#Requested move (early December 2010). Procedural nomination only, I am neutral. Macr86 (talk) 20:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So what "procedure" makes you feel compelled to propose it again?--Kotniski (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed page move (late December 2010) 

message: See User_talk:Anthony_Appleyard#White Rabbit (disambiguation) requested move, where  on January 1st 2011 directly proposed to an administrator to perform this move request, even after being refused here twice! 
184.144.163.241 (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone seems to have developed something of an obsession with this page. I suggest we ignore them.--Kotniski (talk) 12:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it's time for a topic ban. This is ridiculous. --JaGatalk 19:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See User talk:AjaxSmack#White Rabbit (disambiguation) requested move, proposed to an administrator to perform this move request, even after being refused here twice! Macr86 (talk) 03:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsequious move requests by Macr86 (January 2011)
Talk:Crispin Sartwell

message: "His daughter, Emma Sartwell, is trying too hard to look like Lola from Run Lola Run and Lilu from The Fifth Element. Her website, www.crispinsartwell.com/emmahome.htm, features her writing and artwork. At the moment, she is sitting in a dormroom in Chicago with painter Jason Benson and his hairstylist Elizabeth Weiss, editing her father's Wikipedia page."
You may consider this page your own, but this kind of comment in an article really is inappropriate and unprofessional. I'm new on Wikipedia, so I won't just edit it out; but I do expect that to be done (or at least some good reason to be given in the discussion for why it should stay).
::You're right, so I've removed that bit. Kevin 13:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This isn't Myspace.com 

message: This is a vanity page. Wikipedia should have it removed (or at least heavily edited). Thanks. 64.9.57.5 16:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just want to say I agree, surprised this page has not been deleted.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  vanity 

message: I haven't read anything by this guy, but how does the quotation "But calling these people terrorists when no evidence has been or has to be produced is idiotic." measure up to the obvious consequences of removing justification from the concept of truth?
Also, I hope the person this page concerns hasn't seen it, because that list of quotations is positively masturbatory. - Teeks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.200.143.32 (talk) 00:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm. 

message: Not only do there not appear to be reliable sources, the subject is not notable.  I am surprised this article lasted so long.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's what I've found so far:, --Nowa (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Nowa.  Not sure if they really establish notability though, they seem like obscure sources.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Sorcerer

message: There's not enough difference between Sorcerer and Sorceress to warrant two distinct disamb. pages. There certainly aren't male/female pages for Magician (paranormal) or Magician (fantasy), which is where most people would end up clicking through to. Andareed (talk) 07:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with the merge if Sorcerer and Sorceress were articles, but they are not; they are disambiguation pages.  Someone searching for a topic with "Sorcerer" in the title is not likely to be interested in topics with "Sorceress" in the title; as such, a "See also" entry on each other's pages should be sufficient.  Powers T 19:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge would be a bad idea. See, "sorcerer" and "sorceress" may have similar meanings, but the terminology is a bit different. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see no reason why that difference could not be expounded on a merged disambiguation page. bd2412 T 04:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I am writing a thesis on the development of the role of the sorceress in Western Literature, and I was disappointed to find no specific page for "sorceress", and no list of those famous literary sorceresses, beginning with the so-called harlot in the Sumerian "Gilgamesh", Circe and Medeia of the Greeks, the Medieval Morgan le Fay, and culminating with 20th century characters such as Jadis of Charn, Irian of Earthsea, and perhaps even the Sorceress of the Scorpion King.  I do not agree therefore that "sorceress" should be subsumed into its male equivalent, when there is good evidence to show that the female literary, if not actual, occurrence of the type precedes and vastly outnumbers the male.Greatsorceress (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no specific male page either. The sorcerer page is a disambiguation page and most people will end up going to Magician (paranormal) or Magician (fiction). There's also no female specific actress page, although we can likely agree that there are a significant number of female actors. Andareed (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of sorceress into sorcerer
Talk:Cocksucking Cowboy

message: With so many uses for the term listed here, I think a disambiguation page is called for.
:See List of cocktails, which partially serves that purpose. Please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~. It really helps. Thanks! --Willscrlt 11:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation of Names

message: I'm sorry, I've never heard of a "Cocksucking Cowboy" but I've heard of a Buttery Nipple. I suggest titling this "Buttery Nipple" and having this page redirect to IT.
I second this. I have never heard of this Cowboy, and can't see it being very popular do to the offensive name. However, I _have_ heard of a buttery nipple.
:Contrary to the above opinion, I believe it's the controversial nature of the name that makes the drink popular. I imagine it is very amusing to bar patrons to hear someone blushingly ask for this drink by name. The choice of name appears to be a regional thing. In Australia (where it is apparently very popular) and places in the United States, it is known by the Cocksucking Cowboy name. Elsewhere, it appears to be known better as Buttery Nipple. The article asserts that the difference in names is related to a difference in proportions. Not having any personal experience with Cocksucking Cowboys or Buttery Nipples (that sounds so bad!) and given the lack of citations, I will probably opt to list both on the List of cocktails page, and link both to this article. Most of the talk I have seen concerning these drinks concerns the CS name, so I have a feeling it is the more common name where the drink is most popular. However, that is only anecdotal information. I'd love to see some citations. --Willscrlt 11:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most  pubs in Australia will know what a "Cocksucking Cowboy" is.  I have never heard of a "Buttery Nipple"  until reading this page.  I should also say in the Inner City of Sydney you can also call the drink a "Heath Ledger"Tancred 23:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually I've only ever known it as a "Cowboy cocksucker" 203.171.192.17 13:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Choice

message: Never heard it called a cocksucking cowboy until now. Wish I hadn't considering the buttery nipple is my drink of choice. Must be a new thing pushed by the rainbow community. Js... 98.159.29.139 (talk) 20:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buttery nipple
Talk:Mikalah Gordon

message: 1) Why is this person important enough to have a page here?  I don't see the "I like turtles" kid on Wiki...
2) "and the God warrior Marguerite Perrin..." is that her official title? 214.3.138.234 (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two things
Talk:Mohammed Abacha

message: Of course this page is impartial. I mean look at it. It's poorly written, and chances are, it was written by a sympathizer.
I agree!!!! The person that wrote this most likely profited during Abacha's regime from my parents' taxes and such. People are dumb... well a lot of them.
:I hope the current version looks neutral enough for you two. Picaroon (t) 01:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:9M17 Fleyta

message: As with the AT-1 Snapper - I can't seem to get a straight set of dates from my sources. Does anyone have a copy of Janes' who can verify the dates the various models entered service?
Megapixie 4 July 2005 13:36 (UTC)
----
Could this article's heading be changed to 9M17 Phalanga and have AT-2 Swatter redirect to it?
It is best to avoid using only NATO designations (both politically and practically).
----
AT-2 needs a disambiguity page - I came looking for the german AT-2 anti-vehicle landmine ([]) and came here instead. I'd do it myself, but I'm a noob and don't wanna mess it up.. MMad (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page header says "9M17 Fleyta". The first paragraph calls out the "3M11 Fleyta" and also mentions the "AT-2 Swatter" in connection with this. It is not clear that they are all referring to the same weapon. Later on, additional models are referred to as "Skorpions" and "Falangas", with similar confusion as in the first paragraphs about whether these are 3M11s or 9M17s. Also, section headings refer to "AT-2 Swatters", the NATO reporting name, which should be deprecated in favour of the Russian names. An experienced or knowledgable editor (I am neither) should sort this out. NelC (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Hostage (2005 film)

message: The DVD case where he hides the disc is labeled "Heaven can wait".
Ummm...thank you? Was that an answer to a question or trivia or some just a plain comment?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.195.222.211 (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The property value needs a citation or at least a date - I'd guess 2005 - when that valuation had some meaning.  Providing relevant dates and avoiding time assumptions in writing are essential in formal writing.  -- Horkana (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Property Value 

message: Maybe this is just me being biased. But I think it's an insult to refer to this movie as a complete bomb. It might not have been very popular when it was first released, but in more recent years I think it's definitely become a cult classic.
(161.29.246.205 (talk) 22:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Cult Classic
Talk:Nick Carter

message: Okay, can someone please tell me how was Nick's sister BJ and brother-in-law Mike Ashton even involved with the restraining orders? It was only Nick and Angel who filed against Aaron. I even found of it myself right here.
1. https://www.tmz.com/2019/11/20/aaron-carter-restraining-order-court-brother-nick-sister-angel/
2. https://people.com/music/aaron-carter-twin-sister-restraining-order-extended/
3. https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/8530283/nick-carter-restraining-order-against-aaron-carter
4. https://www.etonline.com/aaron-carters-brother-nick-granted-1-year-restraining-order-136773
5. https://www.eonline.com/news/1095408/nick-carter-granted-one-year-restraining-order-against-aaron-carter
See? There was no mention of BJ or Mike in any of the articles. 108.46.251.85 (talk) 17:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal Confusion 

message: Unproven allegations have been repeatedly added to, and removed from, this article. An IP editor has made a legal threat in relation to the material being included. I blocked the IP range under the policy on legal threats. However, I think there is a good case for keeping the material out of the article, and I ask that anyone thinking otherwise should seek consensus here before restoring the disputed material. For convenience I am posting here a copy of comments by  and myself posted at  WP:AN/I. JBW (talk) 09:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am largely inclined to agree, . In fact on reflection I wonder whether a friendly explanation and warning might have been better than an immediate block. I will look again at the disputed content, and if I find I am substantially in agreement with your view I shall remove it, and I suggest that if anyone thinks it should be restored they seek consensus before doing so. In dealing with negative statements about a living person we should err on the side of excluding material if in doubt. JBW (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contentious unproven allegations 

message: I have removed names and exact dates from non-notable family members that we do not need to include, per WP:BLPNAME and WP:BLPPRIVACY. Elizium23 (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Privacy
Talk:Karol Kozeluh

message: From WP:RfD:
* Karol Kozeluh → Karel Kozeluh - I'm listing this with a strong keep recommendation (don't ask me why I'm listing it at all, then - some sort of anal completeness compulsion, I guess), as although it's a mis-spelling, it's apparently a common one ("Many American sources spell his name Karol." - Hayford Peirce 04:46, 25 Jun 2005). Noel (talk) 23:03, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)