Talk:List of crossovers in video games

message: Some of the games seem to be placed in the wrong category. Please fix them up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightmare77 (talk • contribs) 06:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems wrong 

message: His appearence in Art of Fighting 2 doesn't make the game a Crossover Game because, according to his history, he is also an Art of Fighting character.200.255.166.196 (talk) 10:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Geese Howard

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fictional crossover which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Lists are now organized as tables for easier reading, managing, and understanding EchoBlu (talk) 00:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists are now organized as tables 

message: Can someone add Gears 5 which includes characters from Terminator: Dark Fate and Halo: Reach? If I try to do it myself, I'll probably mess up the table. --49.192.81.85 (talk) 06:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gears 5 

message: Smite should be noted on this page as a Religion/Mythology Crossover game. Bringing lore and stories to characters and having them battle and teamup. Doremon764 (talk) 04:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smite 

message: The article should also mention that a Samus Aran skin was originally planned for Fortnite under the condition it was exclusive for Nintendo Switch, to which Epic Games disagreed. I think this was one of the facts brought to light during a lawsuit. Article on skin here; court-related reveal here. ElMeroEse (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metroid In Fortnite 

message: Since you brought up this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of guest characters in video games, I was looking at it and I'm not so sure what to do. On one hand, it is kind of similar, but also I was thinking it might just be a scope issue. I think if the scope were redefined to games that are inherently crossovers by their nature (e.g. Marvel vs. Capcom, Sega Superstars) then it could work. The article could be retitled to "Crossover video game". I think the problem is that currently, there are a lot of games listed that just include references to other games in the form of cameos or skins. TarkusABtalk/contrib 19:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, some of these are just terrible examples. It's up to you guys if you want to AFD or create inclusion criteria for cleaning it up. Honestly, a simple one like "1-2 reliable sources directly calling it a crossover" may cut out a lot of the junk. I know that's helped a lot in similar articles I've cleaned up in the past. Sergecross73 msg me 20:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Expanding Crossover (fiction)#Games is probably sufficient for now in terms of the prose side of things. This list is something else entirely. I think that the idea of a crossover in games may simply be too broad and fall under WP:OLIST - over extensive lists, especially since we aren't actually writing articles about the crossovers themselves. The problem with moving it to List of crossover video games is - is that even a notable topic that passes WP:NLIST?  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it could be.  I think we just need to figure out how to refocus it on actual crossovers (Smash Bros, Dissidia) and less of this trivial cameo and bad example stuff. (I've never heard anyone call the original Animal Crossing game a crossover just because you can play some old NES roms in it.) Sergecross73 msg me 21:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Another one that commonly trims out weaker examples are requiring every game to have their own article. And in this situation, it could be good to have some sort of "no fan made entries" so we don't end up including every rando on the internet who has created a Sonic/Mario/Zelda/etc crossover game too. Sergecross73 msg me 17:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I've decided I'd like to try to take this on. If you could, I'd like to request that everyone holds off on merge/AFD discussions until I'm done. But if you can't wait, so be it. But I think with proper inclusion criteria and better documentation and maintenance, there's hope for this one. Sergecross73 msg me 18:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: Currently, the lack of inclusion criteria has lead to all sorts of poor/unlikely examples, and an WP:INDISCRIMINATE scope. Here's what I wish to start applying to the article:
# Each entry requires at least one reliable source directly calling it a crossover. Multiple if its contested as a WP:FRINGE viewpoint.
# Following a common WP:CSC, each entry must have its own Wikipedia article.
# No fan games, unofficial games, hacks, etc. Part of the noteworthy aspect of crossovers are the work put into overcoming the barriers keeping these things from happening - money, legal rights, philosophical beliefs of companies and creators, etc. The fact that Smash Bros. got the right to use so many different franchises is amazing. The fact that some random guy hacked Mario into Doom is far less so.
# No minor cameo stuff. It should be full "major characters interacting with one another". None of this "There was a Mario sprite in the background" or "A character worse a shirt with Mario's face" on it.
I think this would largely be enforceable, and situations that don't can simply be hashed out through talk page discussions. Sergecross73 msg me 18:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed inclusion criteria 

message: Once the article is trimmed up, my plan is to merge them all into one list, rather than these separate ones. I'm also debating what to do with the cancelled ones. They're currently all unsourced, and many of them seem "unlikely" or "speculative" in my experience. May remove them all, but it does seem like there may be some legit ones in there worth documenting too. (ie Tekken X Street Fighter). Sergecross73 msg me 17:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the cancelled ones are considered common knowledge in some cases, but if you want only ones that are properly sourced, which sites would you prefer in order for this entry to be eligible? In my Metroid In Fortnite entry, I sourced Sports Skeeda and Game Informer. Would you want IGN, Polygon, newspaper sites like L.A. Times, or directly from the video game publisher itself? This will help us determine if a cancelled section is necessary. ElMeroEse (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:VG/S is a good guide for sources to use and not use. IGN, Polygon and Game Informer are good sources. Sports Skeeda is not. Sergecross73 msg me 12:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization