lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Language Acquisition (journal)

message: I have taken the liberty of adding a brief article on the journal Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics. Within the field of generative linguistics, this is the principal academic journal on language acquisition by children, adults, and special populations. I admit to a vested interest in seeing this article included in Wikipedia: Since 2003 I have served as a co-editor of the journal. William.snyder 21:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:American International Rattlesnake Museum

message: Four sentences is not "more than three paragraphs," regardless of how it is presented. This may be a "Good Stub," but it's not start-class yet. I will come back eventually to fix this if nobody else has, but I'm going through and updating and adding Colorado zoo articles first (sorry, home state first, then other places we love), which will take a bit of time. Donlammers (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Albuquerque Museum of Art and History

message: The entryway was modified in the late 1990's or early 2000's; does anyone know if Predock was the architect for that too?  The picture is of the new entryway. --BlueNight (talk) 04:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent renovation 
Talk:Albuquerque Biological Park

message: This article is essentially a "fat list", as it points to the other three facility articles. Unless we decide to merge the zoo, aquarium, and botanic garden articles, it is never going to get much larger - and it has four paragraphs. Another option would be to make it more like a list, but I would hate to do that as I think the way it is now, it provides a good summary of the overall facility. Don Lammers (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessing as Start
Talk:Gathering of Nations

message: The result was Merge, bz silent consensus. --B. Wolterding 08:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposed (Electric 49) 
Talk:Warkworth Institution

message: Information on a study by these researchers from the University of Toronto were removed from the article for the following reasons:
* There were citations to page numbers, but no reference to the article as a whole.  I found some possible citations (Journal of Interpersonal Violence 20.9 (Sept 2005): p1115(17) seemed most likely), but this was a follow-up to an earlier study.  These authors have written at least three in this field.
* The study itself took place at this institution, but was intended to be a study of sexual offenders in general.  Other than the fact that it was the site of study, there appeared to be nothing specific to Warkworth.
Info on this study would be better suited in an article about recidivism, treatment for sexual offenders or a related article.  Blotto adrift 21:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Seto and Barbaree study
Talk:Cuyamungue, New Mexico

message: How is Cuyamungue pronounced? Keith Galveston (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Arizona statistical areas

message: Move delayed.   Buaidh  21:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates 
Talk:Eldorado at Santa Fe, New Mexico

message: I removed this claim, as I could find no support for it, and our List of settlements in New Mexico by population has several CDPs with larger populations. If someone has a RS to support this common assertion, please add it. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest unincorporated community?

message: * 285 Corridor
— Arlo James Barnes 05:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed move
Talk:Lamy, New Mexico

message: Rode through on Amtrak. Is there any hippie or counter-culture history? Looks like maybe some type of intentional community thing was or is going on there. Ghostofnemo (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true. I myself have become quite uncultured due to how hard I counter it. Arlo James Barnes 04:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counter culture? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Wikiforschoolhomework (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies
Talk:Los Cerrillos, New Mexico

message: This article was recently moved from "Los Cerrillos, New Mexico" to just "Los Cerrillos". That doesn't conform to standard Wikipedia naming conventions. Only large, well known cities, such as Los Angeles and Boston, do not include the state name in the article title. Even the article for Albuquerque is titled "Albuquerque, New Mexico". If a user types in "Albuquerque" they are redirected to the "Albuquerque, New Mexico" page. By moving the article, user Unreal7 has deviated from the standard naming conventions. I suggest that it should be moved back, and an automatic redirect created if someone enters "Los Cerrillos". Martylunsford (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Martylunsford. This was an incorrect move, and I've reverted to "Los Cerrillos, New Mexico" . --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: I used to live there, and "Los Cerrillos" just sounds so wrong.  The state's signs on the highway don't call it "LOS" Cerrillos.  Who does, really?  But the real points of this section are, for one, my having heard that Cerrillos was once on the short list for location of the territorial capitol, and secondly, that the town was incorporated at one time.  There was a vote (around 1902?) to disincorporate, and it passed 6 to 2.  I don't have any materials to corroborate this, but if somebody can verify it, it would be a great addition to the article.  Happy New Year.  ;Bear (talk) 05:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More History and critique on the supposed name.
Talk:Enon Valley, Pennsylvania

message: The racial makeup of the borough was 98.71% White, 0.52% African American, 0.52% Asian, and 0.26% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.78% of the population.
Who gives a flying? You americans are weird. Why don't you put it more honestly. I.E. Only 0.52% are decendants of slaves and less than 2% are of other races (that we feel we should mention because we call our once-were-slaves a race even though most of the population are not descendant of slaves regardless of this race thing...blah. blah, blah. You need just two categories, Once-were-slave-owners (99%) and descendant of slaves (1%). Then you'll be able to get over it, finally.--Meika (talk) 23:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Everett, Pennsylvania

message: Maybe someone should reference http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/10/pennsylvania-teen-charged-under-obscure-1972-law-for-simulated-acts-with-jesus-statue/ ? Or some other site's link to the issue? It is a reference to the town, even amidst the criticism.
Cottagecheesedischarge (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Talk:New College Worcester

message: This article has several issues. Apart from  not  having  received any significant  attention for a very  long  time (2007), it has been constantly subjected to  vandalism. It needs:
* Updating to take into account the changes that  were to take place in  2007.
* Restructuring 
* Rewriting into  encyclopedic tone.
* Article and talk page protection.--Kudpung (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Update and Cleanup

message: I'm  restoring  this page as best  I  can from  its creation:
*Cleanup?
I can understand fully that perhaps the article was a tad rambly. However, as Worcester was once the premier, elite of its kind in the UK, surely it deserves to have a far longer article? Especially considering that its a boarding school - surely some of the accomdoation should be discussed?
*further info on seperation?
I think it might be useful to elucidate further on why exactly NCW split from RNIB, as this is a key moment in NCWs' history, and as the article notes, was somewhat drawn out and controversial. It would give the reader further insight knowing exactly why this is so, as currently it only briefly mentions what is a relatively important point.Wheelzsc (talk | contribs) [welcome]
*I have attempted to add some information on NCW's split from the RNIB - but really need information to do this --Blindtimelord 17:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk Page vandalism

message: *further info on seperation?
I think it might be useful to elucidate further on why exactly NCW split from RNIB, as this is a key moment in NCWs' history, and as the article notes, was somewhat drawn out and controversial. It would give the reader further insight knowing exactly why this is so, as currently it only briefly mentions what is a relatively important point.
	▪	I have attempted to add some information on NCW's split from the RNIB - but really need information to do this --Blindtimelord 17:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Blindtimemelord deleted section  of talk  here):
Talk:List of presidents of the United States by age

message: I don't think it makes sense to have a post-presidency timespan and lifespan for those who are living. For it to remain accurate, the page would require daily updates. I propose removing the dates for those who are still living and replacing it with "(living)" similar to the death dates. Jaredjjj (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking closer, I see that those times are actually automatically generated, but I still don't think they should be there. Having a time for the age in the lifespan column (for example) implies that they died at that age. I think it should be changed to "(living)" until they pass. Jaredjjj (talk) 05:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Having a timespan in the post-presidency and lifespan columns shows how much time has passed from "then" until  "now"  for those who are living. Drdpw (talk) 04:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing post-presidency timespan and lifespan for those who are living 

message: Item (d) under "Notes" reads:
"Cleveland was president for two non-consecutive terms; this is his post-presidential retirement, after his second term (1897–1908)." 
The Presidents in those years were William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. Cleveland's second term ran from 1893 to 1897. 192.34.130.214 (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 1897-1908 is the set of years of his post-presidential retirement, not his second term. 217.211.43.202 (talk) 09:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have modified the note to alleviate the confusion. Drdpw (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errant "Notes" 

message: Hi, I'm not American, & I don't mean to offend anyone, but all former presidents are referred to as presidents, without 'former' being noted. Not all presidents can be the incumbent. Would it be prudent to note all former presidents as such? It means quite a few changes in this article though. This is entirely up to you guys. I have to add I have no issue for this article to stay as is. Thanks 120.16.58.126 (talk) 00:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Former' presidents  

message: Is it ok to reformulate some sentences to make them appear more of a lingual and grammatical unity?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.13.197 (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  December edit request 

message: Washington is in a different place than he should be on the list Powerofegg (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It was actually the sorting of John Adams's entry that was incorrect, causing Washington's entry to appear as such. I used an "addkey" parameter with the Adams entry, rather than leaving a deprecated "hidden sort key" template, which seems to have corrected the problem. Thanks —ADavidB 14:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lifespan died list is not sorted correctly
Talk:Schreiber Foods

message: Company History
This section is written kind of weirdly. It has repeated mentions of plant closures and how many people were employed at the closed plant. I think if these claims are substantiated with citations, they should potentially go in a separate section. As is, taking up so much space in the Company History, it makes it sound like the company is on the decline.
--74.62.98.178 (talk) 15:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:New Paris, Pennsylvania

message: I removed the following text in the Gravity Hill section as it is utter nonsense and I can't find any source, nevermind a verifiable one, that anyone has measured the hill: "There are claims that nobody knows for sure what the cause is, or that it could be a gravity warp in the earth. The theory that it is an optical illusion created by the surrounding landscape has been disproved with GPS units with elevation capability.  Balls, cars and water really do roll from a lower point in elevation to a higher point of elevation on the road." 137.99.236.218 (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Simon Sinek

message: Where is the critical analysis of this goofball?  Surely there exists some somewhere?  He's wrong about everything, just like deepak chopra, a charlatan.   His books rely on pseudoscience and now there's video of him smearing Gen Y, while erroneously calling them millenial, going through facebook, without proof to back up his claims.  He talks like a creationist, except for business bad advice.  Ace Frahm (talk) 04:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can suggest some reliable sources I'd be happy to add notable criticism to the article.-- — Keithbob • Talk •  21:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

text: Agreed. I've added a source and confirmed which degree he completed, and from where. Subvisser5 (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: *  BN TV Nov 1, 2017
*  Director - Jan 6, 2017
* Financial Review Jan 10, 2017
*  DNA India Jan 11, 2017
* The New Statesman Jan 11, 2017
* The Blaze Jan 9, 2017
* Bandt Jan 10, 2017
* Entrepreneur Dec 8, 2016
* Forbes Sep 13, 2016
* Forbes Dec 26, 2016
* Fox News Oct 14, 2016
* -- — Keithbob • Talk •  18:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I've added the most relevant info from the sources in this list.-- — Keithbob • Talk •  23:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Sources

message: Let's add a line about the Optimism Company, which Simon opened. It might read something like this:
Simon Sinek founded The Optimism Company, which offers live online classes, on-demand courses, and experiences for companies and individuals.
Note: I'm an employee of Simon Sinek who hasn't done much on Wikipedia before but would like to add this information.
Sources here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/simon-sinek-opens-up-his-business-built-optimism-foundr and 
https://simonsinek.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Simon-Sinek-Bio.pdf ZachfromSimonSinek (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Optimism Company
Talk:Green Bay Area Public School District

message: https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/education/2017/07/11/former-green-bay-teacher-demands-action-school-safety/461218001/
https://jerrybaderlive.com/the-person-i-left-out-of-the-washington-middle-school-podcast-last-week-kerstin-westcott/
https://www.wearegreenbay.com/news/local-news/former-washington-middle-school-students-speak-out-about-rough-days-there/753398944
https://fox11online.com/news/back-to-school/olson-ready-to-lead-turnaround-at-washington-middle-school
87.247.53.24 (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violence at Washington
Talk:Forest City, Pennsylvania

message: The article states: At its height, Forest City, Pennsylvania was in the Guinness Book of World Records as "the town with the most churches in a town. This is very doubtful as the Guinness Book of World Records did not even begin publishing until 1951, many years after Forrest city was at it economic or population peak.  Wkharrisjr (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious claim
Talk:Hop Bottom, Pennsylvania

message: I've corrected a few bits of grammar and re- phrased the odd sentences to make the article more readable and appear more encyclopaedic, though, knowing nothing about Hop Bottom, I have not changed the substance of the article. May I suggest that in- line citations be put into the section I tagged in particular, though further citations to reliable sources would not go amiss.
Regards, HJ Mitchell (talk) 03:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Issues

message: The article incorrectly states:
Hop Bottom has lived in the shadow of the Nicholson Bridge for 97 years. Locals know how inspiring it has been to live amongst the great architectural achievement that the world knows as the thirteenth wonder of the world.
The Nicholson Bridge is in Nicholson, PA which is 12 miles south of Hop Bottom. There is NO connection between Hop Bottom and the Nicholson Bridge.
74.212.59.56 (talk) 10:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error in Hop Bottom, Pennsylvania article 
Talk:Washington Railway and Electric Company

message: This will have an article soon; please don't delete it. I'm taking notes here for the article. --NE2 22:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, you probably already know, but just wanted to make sure you were looking for articles on the current streets. I would guess that most of the old street names (C Street North etc) don't have articles, but the current names (C Street or C Street NW) might. I haven't found any doing some quick checks, but you never know. --AW 14:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Streets
Talk:Montrose, Pennsylvania

message: There is mention twice of con 
artists in the history section, the parenthesis are never closed. There is no link to the people mentioned. 
Several townsfolk and local historians (brainwashed by the con artists Sherman and Tom Wooden claim that Montrose played a significant role in the Northern Trail of the Underground Railroad, and that several escaped slaves families were housed temporarily in town.47.132.46.5 (talk) 01:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Con artists?
Talk:Nicholas Orme

message: Amazon suggest the publication date will be in November 2007. === Vernon White (talk) 22:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Victoria History of the County of Cornwall: Religious History to 1559
Talk:Frank Sinatra Has a Cold

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps
Talk:Totalism

message: I attended a lecture by Ned Rothenberg a few years ago in which he described the rhythmic processes of Samm Bennett, specifically as regards his group Semantics, and they greatly resemble what is described here. Thus, I believe Bennett's work with Semantics might be included. Also, Rothenberg's work with his Double Band. Badagnani 22:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Semantics

message: Hi - perhaps slightly self-promotional, but hopefully not offensively so, I've added some references to totalist compositions of my own. I am a performed and known composer, so hopefully you would consider the addition marginally better than the myspace link of some spamming fool. At the very least, I believe it shows that totalist compositions are being written outside of the core scene in New York and that the subgenre as a whole is growing in size. If you object, please let me know and I will remove accordingly. I do not feel however, that I am notable enough for a Wikipedia page of my own, so that will remain 'red' for the forseeable future. Unless you deem otherwise, of course! Leftblank (talk) 10:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New addition
Template talk:Schools

message: I'd like to suggest two edits to this template, but I'm not being bold! Rixs (talk) 09:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sda030 (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Early Years Education

message: free school is miscategorized. The term does not refer to the funding model of the school but rather the pedagogical model. Free schools can be based upon any funding model including public, private, charter, etc.
Free School should be moved from "By Funding" to "By Style of Education"
Sumguy90 (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Free School Error

message: I just changed to a standard navbox format and redid many of the sections.  This navbox almost seems without direction.  It really needs some work to clean it up.  I'm only comfortable with the three generic types of schools. Beyond that I wonder what this template should contain. Vegaswikian 22:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Why is 'University' in the Tertiary section?  So far as I am aware it is classed as 'Higher Education' throughout much of the world. 87.194.150.80 (talk) 00:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sda030 (talk) 11:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  University 

message: I have created a stub for All-through school. It needs adding to the nav box. But where? Ideally straddling primary and secondary in the By Educational stage section, wouldn't you think? Patient12 (talk) 22:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sda030 (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: All-through school

message: primary school eliminate
186.81.27.24 (talk) 03:35, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 11:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2014 

message: * Added: Middle school, Adult education, Bible college, Religious school, Inclusive education.
* "By style / method": Removed "method" as the school types listed do not restrict themselves to a particular teaching method. Added "purpose" as it better captures the gist. I also grouped the many religious school types into one group, and progressive schools into a group.
* Took out some that are purely an issue of location into "By location".
* Moved Folk high school to Progressive education, as the principles are very similar.
* Grouped Sudbury school and Anarchistic free school under the umbrella Democratic school.
* Proposal #1: I propose that the template is renamed to "Types of educational institutions" as it covers universities, institutes of technology, home-schooling, kindergarten, etc. which in English are rarely defined as schools.
* Proposal #2: Move Specialist school to By style / purpose as it has little to do with funding or eligibility but rather the contents of the curriculum. As such it fits better with Music school, Magnet school, etc.
Sda030 (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes. Added several school types