lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert L. Carneiro

message: one of the most prominent cultural anthropologists of the present. Just type "Robert L. Carneiro" in Google Scholar to see this
Athkalani2000 (talk) 19:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert L. Carneiro is 

message: From CAWylie's talkpage:
: Your addition of the  tag with this article has me puzzled. Having revised the content, modifying style and adding biographical narrative, I now suspect that you will see an even greater need for citations than before. Also, I may have added too much in the narrative, given that it relies on only one new source (Chacon, #2). Would you please check the current revision and offer feedback? azwaldo (talk) 02:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually at the time of anyone's death, I change any BLP tags to a more neutral subject one and without checking to see if anything has changed (in his case 10 years). Nothing has, really, over that time, most likely due to there not being any verifiable ones. In his case, most sources here do not convey any information about him, which is also the reason for the tag. Wyliepedia @ 05:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I misunderstood yours to be the first edit to call for more citations. Digging deeper, found  and  tags; both new to me. Since being initially flagged as needing more sources by User:Maurreen (2 May 2010), several citations have been added to the article and a "stub" tag was removed; so, the persistence of the  tag has me wondering: As it relies on one source, should the bulk of the biographical narrative be removed? azwaldo (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More citations still needed? 
Talk:Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary

message: Please do not delete this page I am currently writing, because I am actually in the process of expanding it. Though this page is mainly chapter headings, I am in the process of elebarating on one of them in particular (Of refinement in the Arts) which is a text which is studied at university as one of Hume's key texts. By creating this page, I am creating an opportunity for people to expand on the other chapters I have not written on. In order to explain Hume's 'Of refinement in the arts', it would need to be included in the context of the larger work which it falls in. Thank you. -- Erudite (talk) 19:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  working... 

message: Even if Hume used capitals in his chapter headings, we don't want all that SHOUTING in Wikipedia. I don't actually think we need all the chapter headings unless you propse to write an article on each one. But in any case do not put them back until they have been de-capitalised. 
Also did you not think that a link to the article about Hume might have been a good idea? It might have prevented the no-context tag being applied. You could not even manage to link to him in your hangon note! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shh
Talk:National Institute on Retirement Security

message: This is to object to the deletion of my entry "National Institute on Retirement Security"
The National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS) is an important national research organization focused on one of the most pressing public policy issues of our time - retirement security.  The founding members of NIRS represent pension funds with combined assets of $7 trillion. This new organization and the principals who are a part of it have received significant interest and coverage by disinterested, respected trade publications who write about pension and retirement issues.  Wikipedia users like me who are interested in research on pensions and retirement have a high degree of interest in NIRS.
Thanks!
Knittingman (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed your tag after reviewing the sources you added; I agree that the sources constitute the assertion of notability that is required.  If anyone else thinks this should be deleted, please start a discussion at AfD. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:New York v. United States

message: Hello, and a good start to the page.  Here are my recommendations:
* Separate the opinion itself from the "Background" section.  In para. 2 of the background, the article starts discussing the opinion.  This paragraph should mention the three incentives, and which ones were challenged - if the rationale for the challenges is different from the rationale of the opinion and dissent, I would note that here (but it's probably not the case).
* Create an "Opinion of the Court" section.  Put the stuff taken out of Background here - tell us what the decision was and what the rationale was.  Make the Take Title Provision section a sub-section (three ='s) of this new section.  The last paragraph of this section probably stands on its own, however.
* Pinpoint cite the direct quotes from the case.
* I'm not positive on this, but I think that the See Also section shouldn't be links to lists/categories - it's more of relevant things to the subject of the article, e.g. in this case the WP article on the act - which doesn't exist.  I don't think that presence in the same volume of the U.S. reports really is relevant.Manumitany (talk) 00:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Review per [[Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases]] To-Do List
Talk:Cold gas thruster

message: Could we add compressed air, or an ~ 78% N2 / 21% O2 mix, to the Propellants and Efficiencies table?  Although a mixture, this is by far the most accessible compressed gas to the general populationWho doesn't know someone who owns an air compressor? and would be an excellent point of reference for those who are not quite as scientifically literate.
PZ (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Malay Ruler

message: I have removed a statement which was strongly biased.  If you have any objections please state them and if you have any sources to support the statement please edit the article. I will however, look for cites that display that POV later. I will remove the NPOV tag at a later date. Best Regards, Eley (talk) 05:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement was added by an anonymous user on 28 June 2008 without prior discussion, and I agreed that it is biased and should not be included. The content of the statement is already included in the article in the neutral and formal way to describe the situation: that the rulers are constitutional monarchs (in other words, mere figureheads). Since there is no such issue in the current version, I had removed the NPOV tag from the article. --Joshua Say "hi" to me!What I've done? 05:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:IceWM

message: sorry, but i've got to say this: i have never seen such an ugly collection of default themes. the environment is really nice, but you almost have to write your own theme, there aren't more than 3-4 usable ones that it comes with.
Such comments aren't useful for Wikipedia. Please take it elsewhere. 220.237.139.183 (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The icewm.org domain wasn't renewed by the original owner, and expired on 2018-08-15.  New domain ice-wm.org was created and is now owned by a current maintainer of the project, see https://github.com/bbidulock/icewm/issues/287
* Latest archive of old site:http://web.archive.org/web/20180525210706/http://www.icewm.org/
* Current archive of expired site: http://web.archive.org/web/20180830153658/http://www.icewm.org/  
— Preceding unsigned comment added by LaurenceDarby (talk • contribs) 11:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domain name change
Talk:FAAM Airborne Laboratory

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontested move request. No prejudice against future requested moves. (closed by non-admin page mover) Schierbecker (talk) 04:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements →  – Organisation renamed itself in 2016  Joe (talk) 16:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 August 2023
Talk:Flying Bedstead

message: That expression appears in the article, but it's a red link. Googling "wooden stick check" returns mirrors of this article, plus unrelated pages where "wooden stick" and "check are separated by punctuation (like "Either with your finger or a wooden stick, check the moisture level...")
So what does that even mean? Is it the result of vandalism?Devil Master (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's standard practice in aviation to confirm the amount of fuel in the tanks with a calibrated dipstick (like the one for the oil in your car) In this case the pilot failed to do so, ran out of fuel, and crashed. I've edited the page linking to dipstick. Johnnie Rico (talk) 23:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a wooden stick check?

message: I,ve never heard of the LLRV being called flying bedstead. Do you have references??? If not then the article should be amended.--Petebutt (talk) 07:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm convinced that the author has applied wishful thinking here. In the meantime I shall re-direct the article to the TMR and if references come up then a proper disambiguation page can be raised.--Petebutt (talk) 09:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: LLRV
Talk:Hemisphere Dancer

message: This article includes the line
The "Hemisphere Dancer" had been carrying Buffett, U2's Bono, and Island Records producer Chris Blackwell, but they were not onboard at the time.
Does "they" include Buffet, i.e. was he on board while being shot at?
In addition, the Jimmy Buffett article describes the same event, but says
On board the plane with Buffett were U2's Bono, and Island Records producer Chris Blackwell.
Several other sources on the Web say that all three were present.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtgriscom (talk • contribs) 12:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was on board during the Jamaica incident?
Talk:Isotta Fraschini Delta

message: "Although the air-cooling might be considered an anachronism even during the 1930s"
That sentence is simply not valid, air cooled engine has many advantages from engineering point of view, every successful radial engine during ww2 was air cooled, every modern jet engine is air-cooled.
The issue is that inline engines are very difficult to cool by air, so they had to use water cooling.
Air cooled inline engines were not anachronism during second part of '30, they were a culmination of efforts!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.148.84.70 (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Z Application Assist Processor

message: Is there a citation for the first Java workload processed on a zAAP?
We talk here about a zAAP differing in microcode terms. I'm not sure that's accurate. Though to verify it might require some Non-Public-Domain discussions. Possibly best to re-word. Martin Packer (talk) 10:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Martinsyde

message: As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes.  To make things easier to sort out there is a special :Category:British motorcycles  Please add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create.  It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing.  I've linked the Category to the Commons Motorcycles of Britain so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons. The people behind the bikes also bring it all to life - I've created the :Category:British motorcycle pioneers so please have a look and see if you can add or expand any?  Thanks  Thruxton (talk) 16:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles should be categorized as per Wikipedia:Categorization. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Category for British Motorcycles
Talk:Balance (ability)

message: I accidentally stumbled on this missing topic while writing the disambig page for center of balance. Probably everywhere confuses this topic with equilibrioception, which is not the same. Laudak (talk) 19:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: Reference #2 simply does not exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.169.2.106 (talk) 18:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's an article with that title (), and an article that matches the rest of the citation (). But obviously they are not the same article. I'm not sure which was intended as the reference. Looie496 (talk) 18:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, the editor who added it accidentally duplicated the title for refs 2 and 3.  I've fixed the problem.  Thanks for pointing it out. Looie496 (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake 

message: How is the image used for the "fatigue" section of this article relevant? it's a picture of a man in a balancing pose with a mollusk shell picture behind him, how is that "the effect of fatigue on balance"? 151.84.221.155 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatigue effect on balance image
Talk:Malaysian batik

message: ]]
Visit Us at Batik Sutera Terengganu Online.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.92.4.202 (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batik Sutera Terengganu Online
Talk:Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Science & Technology

message: The article presently links to James S. Hirsch.  I believe (but can not confirm) it should link to James V. Hirsch, though there is no article for him. AlanDewey (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: DST is composed is various Offices, current or historic. This page should list those. 171.66.55.145 (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should at least have some reference to an org chart
Talk:Post stall

message: I propose that this article be merged with Stall (fluid dynamics) (and Post stall be converted to a redirect.)
This article has been in existence for a dozen years but it has not matured or evolved. The information it contains is technically incorrect because it states that post stall behaviour is a function of airspeed whereas, in fact, post stall behaviour is a function of angle of attack. If anything can be salvaged from this article it can be inserted into Stall (fluid dynamics). Dolphin (t) 13:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal : Stall (fluid dynamics)
Talk:Rolls-Royce RZ.2

message: Really? what are they? Can think of 6 and 3 of them not much use in this situation.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Degrees angular, not degrees of freedom. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OBV brain fade. --Kitchen Knife (talk) 02:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 7DOF
Talk:Book of Discipline

message: I've removed a link to the EUB Book of Discipline - from the Evangelical United Brethren Church, as I think it may be covered in the article about Book of Discipline of the Evangelical Association (which doesn't exist at the time of writing this). I had a brief look at the different articles for the churches, and couldn't quite get my head round it. Feel free to add it back if it should be there!!! Thanks, Drum guy (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EUB Book of Discipline - removed
Talk:Roma (airship)

message: The article says the Roma was a USN ship, but the Langley Field Times, the New York Times pdf (which actually contrasts the Navy and Army airships) and the post-disaster Flight article all say Army. Is this an error, or did both services operate the ship at different times? Grover Snodd (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navy or Army? 

message: So, how did it get from Europe to America? did it fly under its own power, or was it transported by ship? --BjKa (talk) 12:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Major Thornell wanted to fly it to the states, but the request was denied permission. It took them eight weeks to pack the airship in wooden crates. It was transported by the USS_Mars_(AC-6) to Langley.C5mjohn (talk) 20:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlantic Crossing 

message: The "Design" section mentions Ansaldo motors, but the "Specifications" section speaks of Liberty motors. This should be explained. I guess there was a replacement at some point in time? --BjKa (talk) 12:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motors
Talk:Tidings of Comfort and Joy

message: The question du jour is: what is not notable enough about this article?  Is it the brevity, the subject matter, or the author's relative lack of fame?  I can fix number 1, can't fix number 2, and I won't fix number 3.  Of course I object to this article's deletion -- I wrote it.  So, how about some reasons?  --MARQUIS111 (talk) 19:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Zachary Pangelinan

message: This article clearly needs adding to Kevo-723 (talk) 19:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bishop of Salford

message: Word is there'll be an announcement today.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.191.234 (talk) 08:17, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: replacement

message: This is arch and obscure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.191.234 (talk) 10:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: and went on to take up the reins of part of

message: Until his installation, Arnold is not the bishop of Salford and should not be in the infobox or lists. Elizium23 (talk) 02:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arnold is not yet bishop of Salford
Talk:Jemput-jemput

message: The current article starts:
Cokodok (alternate spelling: Cekodok), also called Kuih Kodok or Cucur or Jemput-jemput, is a traditional Malaysian fritter snack that is made with flour and banana, and is fried. It is usually round in shape and tends to vary in size. There are many varieties of this snack, some substituting the banana with anchovies, prawns, onion or maize.
I offer the following (Original Research) for possible confirmation from some other source:  Whilst we were living in Malaysia in the seventies, our friends taught us to make a spicy onion (sometimes with other vegetables added, such as green chillies or bell-peppers) version of this fried snack, under the name, as then spelt, "Chochor Kodok" (the current spelling would be "Cucur Kodok". In my friends' pronunciations, it usually sounded like "Cocokedok", with first and last syllables accented.  We still make and enjoy "Cocokedok" with our family and friends.
yoyo (talk) 07:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names
Talk:Haveli Lakha

message: )
Italic text  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.64.179 (talk) 04:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

message: Haveli Lakha  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr usman Ahmad (talk • contribs) 08:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2023 (2) 

message: PAKISTAN QUMI GHREEB ITTHad leader 182.180.183.54 (talk) 12:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALTAF HUSSAIN HASHMI
Talk:Dodol

message: This article describes dodol as being "toffy-like." Since there's no word as "toffy" in the English language, I'm a bit confused as to what this is supposed to mean. "Taffy-like"? "Toffee-like"? Please fix this.
GnatsFriend (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toffy-like 

message: The article The Dodol Depok has several issues: the title should not include the word "The", the references need checking.  It offers little information. Instead of fixing the present article, I think it is better to merge it into Dodol Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[The Dodol Depok]] into [[Dodol]]
Talk:Load balancing (electrical power)

message: Load balancing is moving energy so that it meets any number of requirements, such as cost, safety, convenience, emergency situation. The contents of this article deal with only a very specific situation. Behind load balancing is a huge range of technology, considerable history, theory, any number of interesting applications.
Not one, but several experts need to write this article. Electrical engineers with practical design experience, for example. Professors. Patent writers. Specialists in industrial archeology.
24.130.14.173 (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Load Balancing Expert Attention

message: This is a strange article, addressing a very complex subject, to wit: grid scale electricity is an uncommon commodity in that it is necessarily generated on-demand, just-in-time and with (virtually) zero stock. It does so, however, in such a disjointed way that it is difficult to appraise, comment or amend.
Also seem quite redundant with the articles listed in the See also section, which itself could be expanded. Started with Electrical grid.
Noliscient (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A feral article in need of re-domestication ?
Talk:Pacific 231

message: Could we please flesh out the orchestration listing?  I know I can hover over the links to see what the abbreviations stand for, but it wouldn't be that much longer if it was spelled out.  I'd do it myself but I'm not sure what "[1.2]" means.  Thanks.DavidRF (talk) 14:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orchestration prose
Talk:Lock and Dam No. 5A

message: The following comment was left on the comments subpage created by an IP User:
Wonderful list of locks and dams on the Upper Mississippi. A small error tho - when a person clicks on a specific lock, say 5A the page that comes up has the info for lock 5A on the upper part of the page. The information for lock 6 (Trempealeau) lists on the right hand side of that page. (left by IP user 192.234.99.1)
Thanks, --Alinnisawest (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving From Comments Subpage... 

message: The following coordinate fixes are need for
you have lock and dam 5A located where 6 is by Trempleau, WI rather than near Winona, mn—98.143.228.207 (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Brooklyn Bushwicks

message: They are just the “Bushwicks.”  Not “Brooklyn.” I’m Max Rosner’s great grandson, will do some corrective editing when I have time. Marc Rosner 2600:1017:B83C:3B0B:3C08:D799:139C:9FD1 (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name
Talk:Document clustering

message: sorry if i'm doing anything wrong. I added a redirect to this page also from "text clustering" and modified the article adding that document clustering is also called 'text clustering', please correct if any of it is wrong --Foma84 (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  text clustering redirect 

message: I was unable to find clustering on the provided example link for usa.gov.  Maybe Yippy would be a better example?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.138.210.3 (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  FirstGov.gov example missing clustering? 

message: The factual accuracy of this article is quite low. First off, it discusses both ad hoc clustering (in search engines) and what might be called full-set clustering, without acknowledging the difference. Then, it makes a few unintelligible remarks like "Document clustering is generally considered to be a centralized process" (?) and finally it claims that k-means is "less accurate" than hierarchical clustering, as if accuracy on clustering can be measured. (Surely it can when ground truth labels are provided, but I've never seen a comparison that showed hierarchies to be more accurate.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Kue kochi

message: Hi, I have a question regarding the nomenclature used. Where is the "kuih" called "kuci kuciku"? "Kuci kuciku" is an expression people use to play with babies in KL, where I'm from.128.175.180.149 (talk) 19:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  kuci kuciku 