lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Google Checkout

message: This really isn't a rival to a lot of Paypal's services. It's a checkout system/process (as is kinda implied) and nothing else. Zetetic Apparatchik 16:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Trending topic that Google checkout is now known as google wallet Proposed redirect to that page. Mypagesarecool (talk) 03:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Redirection 

message: I have proposed Google EPayments for deletion, because it is completely redundant, with the presence of this Checkout article. I have also taken away the merge templates from both the source and destination pages for now. --Mambo Jambo 17:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google EPayments - Proposed for Deletion 

message: The comparison with Paypal makes this read more like a press release. It needs to deleted.
:I actually found it quite useful Mordecai-Mark Mac Low 20:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement Not Information  

message: Hi - I work for Google and saw that there is a factually incorrect statement in the article about Google Checkout not offering email support. Google Checkout supports customers through multiple channels such as the Help Center, Help Forum, and email support. Google Checkout buyers can request email support from the Google Checkout Buyer Help Center (https://support.google.com/wallet/bin/request.py?contact_type=contact_policy&policy=wallet&) and merchants can request email support from the Google Checkout Merchant Help Center (https://support.google.com/checkout/sell/bin/request.py?). Jsmallz1 (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Checkout Support 
Talk:Stone pine

message: The name "Stone Pine" is ambiguous. I have also seen it refer collectively to white pines (subgenus Strobus) in subsection Cembrae (Whitebark Pine, Swiss Pine, Korean Pine, and Siberian Pine). Maybe this page should be moved to Pinus pinea and "Stone Pine" be made into a disambiguation page, following WikiProject Plants's suggested guideline: "If a common name can refer to more than one plant, it should be a disambiguation page." SCHZMO ✍ 16:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stone Pine" 

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Stone.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: I was wondering if it would be worth it to add the following info to this article. It is about stone-pine cones found in a tomb in Britain.
"The mourners' unusual choice of stone-pine cones as incense added further credence to the team's theory. The stone pine was not native to Britain. It was, however, indigenous to Italy, where Roman citizens frequently planted it around local amphitheaters: The tree's fragrant cones are thought to have helped cloak the nauseating stench inside. The fragrant perfume of the stone pine would have made a fan's fitting farewell to a popular female star of the arena." 
http://discovermagazine.com/2001/dec/featglad
Stone-pines are not native from Britain, and it would appear Romans planted them around amphiteaters not only in Italy, but also elsewhere, thus widening the range of the species. More on the matter of its expansion:
http://www.conifers.org/pi/Pinus_pinea.php  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leirus (talk • contribs) 16:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stone Pines in Roman times.
Talk:Thorkell the Tall

message: Is this the same person as Thorkill-Hake referenced in Moby Dick?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.3.222.7 (talk) 07:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Thorkill-Hake

message: Wouldn't a better translation be "the Tall"? One might get the impression he a bit too fond of berserking on 'shrooms ;) Havard 22:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Havard 10:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I understand that he had to leave. The Scandinavian legal code, and maybe the Anglo-Saxon too, equated one's level of honour with one's level of trustworthiness. If you were challenged to mortal combat (holmgang) and turned it down, you did not only loose your honour, but also your credibility in a court of law. If Thorkell's wife admitted to the murder, Thorkell would have lost all his honour and be publicly disgraced.--Berig 19:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hávi = the High?
Talk:Hugo

message: I removed "Highly unusual geophysical operations". It did not have any WP-link and googling the term does not give any google hits save for a "the free dictionary" abbreviation list. More importantly this term give no google scholar hits at all. If the term actually is in use, it does not seem to hold enough significance. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Kreativt (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Highly unusual geophysical operations"?

message: I deleted the info that Hugo is the number one name in Sweden, as that is purely faulty. I believe that all those claims should be backed up by quotes. If not, they should probably be deleted./Carl Bjork
i read that it is #5 in sweden in 2007...?   -leigh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.147.244 (talk) 03:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hugo's popularity

message: There's one more Hugo out there. He's a TV character. From lost
:Hugo "Hurley" Reyes was listed on this page at the time of your comment.  People named Hugo (including fictional characters) have since been forked over to Hugo (name), which appears on this dab.  Reyes is still listed there.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  One more 

message: I've removed the clean-up tag that had been on for a couple of months. I'm unsure why it was tagged; a couple of minor edits have been made and the article seems fine. If anyone feels it needs further work, please edit it or re-tag and put the reasons on here. Thanks, Boleyn2 (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up tag

message: hugojack14 95.151.164.30 (talk) 21:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hugo
Talk:Sundanese people

message: There is a clan of people in India called Sunda (clan). Is there any connection of Sundanese people with this Sunda (clan)? burdak 16:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is no connection or relation between Sunda (clan) with Sundanese. — Indon (reply) — 09:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Sundanese

message: Seemingly there is a significant number of commentators which support the general removal of infobox collages. I think there is a great opportunity to get a general agreement on this matter. It is clear that it has to be a broad consensus, which must involve as many editors as possible, otherwise there is a big risk for this decision to be challenged in the near future. I opened a Request for comment process, hoping that more people will adhere to this proposal. Please comment here. Hahun (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for the deletion of all the galleries of personalities from the articles about ethnic groups 
Talk:Germantown High School (Tennessee)

message: Whoever keeps deleting my edits, please stop. They are additions to the history of the school.
thanks---  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.201.243 (talk) 05:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Road map

message: This page formerly was a redirect to Roadmap, a computer program.  I changed it to redirect to Map, because it seems like any person searching for "road map" should expect to get information on road maps in general, not a computer program.  Also, from the "what links here" page it is apparent that every article that contains the phrase "road map" wikified is referring to road maps, not the computer program.  Foxmulder 16:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NetFlow

message: I've put back the section about NetFlow probes. I am not sure about that the NetFlow was designed to eliminate probes. Maybe it is true, but using probes is sometimes necessary as cisco devices are not designed for purpose of exporting NetFlow, it is only side effect. I am working as an network security consultant and did dozens of measurements for billing or security purposes and many times I face problems connecting with NetFlow generation done on the Cisco devices. On saturated networks, it is often impossible to enable it as the device utilizition jump to 100% (and netflow data are HARDLY sampled). Try to activate such feature on vital router in bank or ISP network. The system admin will shoot you:)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.102.12.150 (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Directories of software in articles of this nature is outside WP:EL guidelines.  I've removed the list and suggest that if anyone feels there is a burning need for an external link to a specific piece of software, raise it in this talk page first to allow others to comment, else you may be reverted. -- Moondyne 13:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software directory 

message: In section Netflow Record, it is said that the record contains L3 headers and a list of the items contained in that header is given:
# Layer 3 headers:
    * Source & destination IP addresses
    * Source and destination port numbers
    * IP protocol
    * Type of Service (ToS) value
src and dst ports are NOT part of l3 header but l4 header. this brings to the paragraph which is just above which says :In the case of NetFlow, Cisco uses the common 5-tuple definition, where a flow is defined as a unidirectional sequence of packets all sharing all of the following 5 values:
   1. Source IP address
   2. Destination IP address
   3. Source TCP port
   4. Destination TCP port
   5. IP protocol
I'm not very familiar with netflow but if src and dst ports are part of what defines a flow, does this mean that netflow supports only ip protocols 6 and 17 (tcp and udp) because the other ones (ex. gre, esp,ip-in-ip etc) DO NOT have port numbers and thus do not qualify to form a tuple.Strangeusername 08:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect terminology 

message: I wish to dispute this claim. The section very succinctly answered my question of "Which version of Netflow supports IPv6"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.239.45.4 (talk) 22:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This section contains information which may be of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article's subject matter. 

message: I noticed someone went through and edited all occurences of "NetFlow" and changed them to "Netflow." The proper spelling of the term does in fact use a capital "F" (http://www.cisco.com/web/go/netflow) and these should be changed back. Lahnfeear (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Kawasaki Heavy Industries

message: Financial Digests of Kawasaki Heavy Industries has been issueed by the accounting department at Kobe.(See Financial Digests )
So it is better to write "Kobe and Tokyo",not "Tokyo and Kobe" as headquarters of Kawasaki Heavy Industries .
galuboo 10:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters 

message: I have questions about my kawasaki 2-stroke 85. I need to know if you guys will answer them? Ilovebirtbikes 22:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What??? 

message: How did the company get to be where it is today? and similar questions ought to be answered. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No history section 

message: What is that?  Is that bottom ash disposal? I picked this up on a Disambiguation link repair job. --Knulclunk (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ash handling systems 

message: Pioneer-United Artists Communications is a Company. A Company Named Bandai has returned to A Company Named Tecmo.--2600:1702:4B28:F760:85B5:5AF2:6286:B70F (talk) 03:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pioneer-United Artists Communications 

message: Formal request has been received to merge Kawasaki motorcycles into Kawasaki Heavy Industries; dated: October 12, 2021. Proposer's rationale: The Kawasaki Heavy Industries article has little info as it already is and having a separate article for its motorcycles (which also has little info) is redundant. Pinging proposer  I would note that there is also an article for Kawasaki Heavy Industries Motorcycle & Engine, which may be a better merge target. Richard3120 (talk) 13:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose I think the Kawasaki Heavy Industries looks quite long as it is, if a merger of this page is really needed, I'd agree with Richard3120 that Kawasaki Heavy Industries Motorcycle & Engine might be a better target. However, I believe that the page can be considerably expanded, particularly with sections on Kawasaki their motorcycle models, particularly including the popular Ninja sports motorcycle and Kawasaki W series lines. Mugimeshi (talk) 07:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Biocosm

message: AfD closure comment: this should either be reduced to a stub or merged with Anthropic principle. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is just a touch outside the anthropic priciple -- it belongs more in sci-fi. •Jim62sch• 21:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

message: This concept is no longer defined in the article this redirect point to; it is briefly touched on, but can scarcely be said to be explained, in fact the term is never used. It is confusing and less than useless to maintain a page (that is linked to, both in Wikipedia, and without) that only serves to catch traffic and point it towards a page that does not explain the term at all. We should purge the few remaining links to this page and erase it, if we are not going to devote any effort towards explaining the term. If it is not notable, it's not notable-if it is worth of inclusion, it should be explained wherever we send readers, or left blank until such time as an article is written or the term is explained within another article.71.235.31.212 (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless and Missleading Redirect
Talk:John Moschitta Jr.

message: Hidey ho. :)
I must say I was made aware of John's holding the Guinness record as of 1990, but that Steve Woodmore took the title after that. Has John absconded it back? Is there a way to verify this at the Guinness book? Neither their online edition nor the most recent printed copy I have lists their record standings for speed talking. I mean, I know they keep the record they just like to play hard to get with some of them that are less scintilating from time to time. ;) Jesset77 23:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guinness Record 

message: User 216.73.194.28: Firstly, please do not delete sections of this article without giving reasons for their removal and secondly, if you do remove something as relevant as the new record holders details from the section it was listed, be sure that it is still noted somewhere relevant in the article. Otherwise your changes come across as vandalism. Robvanvee (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: User 216.73.194.28: I see your vandalism persists! If I didn't know any better I would have to assume you are John Moschitta or some one close to him! Robvanvee (talk) 12:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Someone should really insert a citation for the disputed sentence. Formerip (talk) 19:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: The link to "TV Acres Advertising Mascots", dating back to September 18, 2008, seems very scammy to me (persistent "winner" popups, etc.). Can it not be deleted?
Muleiolenimi (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Al Sapienza

message: Al Sapienza used to come to my house when I was a little girl, not that he was so old, but he was old enough to drive a car back then and it was in my eyes at the time much older then me! 
He was friends with a large group of gals and guys in Rockland County NY. I remember even back then his talking about how he wanted to be an Actor.  Sure, we all have hopes and dreams of what we want to be when we grow up, but how many of us really follow that rainbow?  And how many of us hang in there work hard to have all our hopes and dreams come true till we suceed?
Al,(Mr. Sapienza) that is,  you did it and we are all so proud of you! I heard you made it back to the Ramapo Renuion with Robin, Beth and so many others. It was nice to hear that over the years (and there have been several since growing up and becoming who we are today) that Al has remained the same humble funny person he always was.  It's nice to see that fame no matter what level it is has not gone to ones head.
Much continued sucess to you, we all look forward to seeing you on the big screen and or the TV.
*Wow that amazing.  You knew him? X06 20:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I readded this category because the 2nd source is an interview with him clearly stating that he is from Italian descent. --190.157.238.103 (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian descent cat 

message: I've been binge watching White Collar on Netflix over the past week, and in Season 3, Ep. 4, "Dentist of Detroit," I noticed that the chief mob boss of the episode - Frank DeLuca, Jr. - bore a striking resemblance to Mikey Palmice. I checked IMDb; it's confirmed to be him, so I threw it into the filmography section and, while I was in there, took the liberty of working up the grammar under the "notes" header. In the episode they refer to Sapienza's character as "Frank DeLuca, Jr.," though as his father is deceased, I would assume he should just be "Frank DeLuca" - I went ahead and named him a Junior just on the pretense that the Special Agents in the earlier parts of the episode refer to him as such. Oh, and Sapienza's gotten very rotund and very old since I last saw him in anything (1999, to be exact). 64.253.217.55 (talk) 04:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Collar, some cleaning up 
Talk:Waseelah

message: This article needs attention. The honorifics after the names of the various people need to be removed in conformance with wikipedia policy. Also, it sounds more like an excerpt from a pamphlet than an encyclopaedia article. I also think that since its discussing the same subject as the Tawassul article, they need to be merged.--Nkv 17:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes/merge needed 

message: There is no need to merge it with Waseelah as the information represented at Tawassul is contradictory to the information under Waseelah.
: Well then obviously only one of them is correct. There is a need to discuss which one is and then merge the two articles. Anyone searching for information on Tawassul/Waseelah will get completely different information depending on the term he searches for which is not the way an encyclopaedia should be. I'm putting the merge request again. Please don't remove it unless you can clearly state why two articles that discuss the same subject (although from seemingly opposing viewpoints) should remain separate rather than be merged into one that presents either side of the issue. (PS. It helps dicussion if you inline your comments with mine rather than create new sections for every response). Peace. --Nkv 10:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of the content in the Waseelah article is original research. They draw on quotes directly from the Quran and then there is an interpretation by the author of the article followed by a conclusion. That's not how an encyclopaedia article should be. It should just present facts. Something like Defintion (with reference), Statements from the Quran and other texts describing it (if needed), viewpoints about Tawassul by different groups (either many of them or none. Not just the Deobandis). References. Right now, it looks like a fatwa on what Tawassul is and it's permissibility rather than a secular encyclopaedia detailing the facts. --Nkv 10:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Need 

message: Give me a direct link to the Wikipedia rule of Honorifics.
: Here you go. --Nkv 10:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorifics
Talk:Susan Richardson

message: Perhaps articles related to confirmed North Korean kidnappings should be included under a See Also heading, e.g. North_Korean_abductions_of_Japanese?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.176.4.96 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In Sally Jessy Raphael - TV Stars of the '70s (1991) at the 25:00 minute mark she states that she was duped into going to South Korea and had difficulty leaving the country. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOdr0haUTT0 CarlSerafino (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Alevtina Kolchina

message: ++Lar: t/c 17:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Word processing

message: Seems as if one article, word processor or word processing, is enough. I prefer the word processor article to this one, having used the MT/ST and Lexitron back in the day.
Bharshaw 17:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

message: In my opinion this article should be tagged for deletion.  It's simply a very verbose definition of a verb based on the "Word processor" article cited above.  Also, none of the author's statements of fact are substantiated by references. K. Kellogg-Smith 03:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be tagged for deletion. 

message: There are even these templates with the software examples:
* Template:Word processors
* Template:Desktop publishing software
IMO word processors are for simple things, like reports with less than 100 pages. Desktop publishing is for big projects (more than 100 pages and/or more than 10 MB). LyX, based on the philosophy of TeX/LaTeX is in this case a desktop publishing software and not a word processor (one can make books with LyX). Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 08:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the difference between [[Desktop publishing]], [[Document processor]], and [[Word processor]]? 

message: *Someone suggests for this article to merge with Word Processor. I agree. Time to merge. Let's merge motherf****rs --Yodamgod (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Ok, Let's do merge'''
Talk:A Ferry Boat That Has No Owner

message: Hi,
see MOS:TITLE for relevant guidelines, especially the "translation" section.
Based on some quick searches, it seems like the most common English title for the film in academic lit is "A Ferry Boat That Has No Owner". This differs from both the article's current title "Imjaeomneun nareutbae" and the translation used in the article ("The Ownerless Ferry Boat").
I'd also argue the current title is not preferred because it's non-English. A possible exception would be if it's widely used, but it's not. I'm going to change the title and translation to "A Ferry Boat That Has No Owner"; please discuss here and possibly undo if disagree toobigtokale (talk) 00:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article and translated title