Talk:Jackass Number Two

message: I thought that Raab himself was never one of the starring cast members anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.21.231 (talk • contribs) 
: Did you watch the first one? He was in it for a great deal of the movie. --Liface 23:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Starring

message: *Bam gets branded by Ryan Dunn, while Johnny Knoxville holds him still.
*Bam's crew jump on Rake Yohn’s head while not looking.
*Bam sets Rake Yohn's hair on fire
*Chris Pontius drinks horse semen.
*Don Vito gets his tooth pulled out by Bam's Lamborghini.
*Knoxville and Bam try out a “hornet's nest grenade”.
*Knoxville gets rammed by a yak, blindfolded.
*Knoxville rides a rocket, Wile E. Coyote style.
*Ryan Dunn is locked in a car with a bee's nest.
*Steve-O gets a leech put on his eyeball.
*Wee Man and Preston do the "Human Bungee"
*Cobra Kid "David Weathers" releases a cobra on Bam Margera and makes him cry.
*A big dance intro.
*Giving two random girls tattoos about signs they saw on the way to the tattoo parlor.
::Please cite sources for these. Iolakana•T 20:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Known stunts/skits

message: I added  to the part about the second trailer, as I have been unable to locate it.  Cite a link for it if it is indeed out. - seinman 02:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Second trailer

message: i am removing the 'yak' links [they're pranks] and wikifying the words. 
Unless someone objects.
Steamrunner 09:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  yak 

message: I understand that some of the scenes (such as the intro) needed CG in order to really be done, however I got the feeling the editing room wanted to 'sex it up' to much.  I think that the cg detracted from the movie, its supposed to be chaos after all.  I'm not an expert in the field, but I can see when the lighting is just off.  
Scenes that I noticed CG in:
Begining bull stampede
Firehose Rodeo
Bull Teeter-totter (the end where Knoxville is the last one and is running out, watch the legs
Bungee Jump (the bungie pulling weeman into the water after Preston has fallen)
Swamp Parachute Stunt
Thats all I can remember off my head.
If it's significant, like it really affected some of the skits or something, you should add it to the article.  Just remember to find a source.  SuperDT 18:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Computer Generation

message: Rake is not in this movie!!!Toasty! 01:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rake Yohn 

message: In the list describing the various stunts in the movie, should we include the name of every stunt? Or could that be a possible copyright violation? --Pixelface 19:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stunt names

message: No offense to most of you, but some of you have extremely crappy formal English writing skills. I fixed around 30 or so typos that were caused from 3-5 users in the summary section alone!  A rule of thumb:  if it doesn't make sense to you,it probably won't make sense to other people. 
Second, please refrain from using slang such as "ass," "piss," "poo," etc., unless it is from a quote, or ABSOLUTELY necessary.  
Third, please stop using words like don't, can't, it's, etc. and instead use do not, cannot, it is, etc.
I'm sorry if I sound mean, but it makes me so mad and disturbed that some people can barely understand formal writing skills.  That is all.  SuperDT 05:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About: Grammar, punctuation, and all that good stuff

message: It's not proper to edit a talk page and remove someone's post because you don't agree with it or it annoys you.  What SuperDT said was accurate and necessary.  The article needs gramaticall cleanup so that it doesn't appear to be written by a 10 year old.  I realize that 10 year olds are drawn to this article, but come on, we're writing for an encyclopedia here. -seinman 23:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page ettiquite

message: I think it should be revelant to notate how Don Vito's scene's were pulled from the movie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.41.14.138 (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Vito was pulled from the film becuase of his Arrest for Sexual Assault, you can read about it and see a picture of his mugshot on his page (Vincent Margera). ClayteX 19:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Vito 

message: I'm asking this question because the first time I was watched it, I felt the bouncing of the tires going down hill was a bit strange, un-natural, does anyone also see what I am talking about or have an explaination? - RVDDP2501 00:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Their body weights and masses are necessarily spread unevenly through the tire, creating an "elliptical orbit" effect. If you were in the tire, when do you think you would bounce higher - when the part of the tire braced by your spine hit the ground, or when the part of the tire which had the least body against it and therefore more flex in the rubber did.. the exact piece of dirt the tire bounces off and the undulating nature of the slope also affect it. <FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">z</FONT> talk 12:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the "Big Tire Race" faked? 

message: :Image:Jn2soundtrackcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Jn2soundtrackcover.jpg

message: Why does the opening paragraph cite Rake Yohn did not return for this installment? He did in fact film stunts with the crew but they just didn't make the final cut. While it's ok to say he didn't show up in the movie, I think it's fair to at least mention he did return with the other supporting crew. He mentions all this on his official Myspace as well if it needs verification. 
Navex 00:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rake Yohn

message: ::By one calculation, Jackass Number Two is the sixth-highest grossing documentary in the U.S.
As I wrote the source in question, per WP:COI, I suggest it on the talk page for editors to decide what to do with rather than adding it myself. The Village Voice review listed above is also notable. THF 23:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with the addition, I just know others have voiced concerns.. <FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">z</FONT> talk 00:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Is this in the right place? <FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">z</FONT> talk 03:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes, if you click on the link that Ted supplied above.  Or, here it is again:  http://www.american.com/archive/2007/august-0807/more-fudged-michael-moore-numbers--David Shankbone 03:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed addition 

message: Based on arguments over this list on Talk:Sicko, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, the consensus is that this list should in no way be used.  --David Shankbone 15:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Consensus: Not to use Ted Frank's list

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I seem to have been hearing conflicting reports, is Jackass 2.5 going to be Jackass 2 with new footage, or is it supposed to be a movie made entirely of footage not in 2? -Joltman (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now it looks like new footage that was cut out of the original movie, like what would normally be included in special features. They are releasing it online, so they probably won't be including the original movie. — OcatecirT 16:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I got Jackass 2.5 yesterday, and it's an entirely new movie.  It is not just an extended version of Jackass Number 2, it is entirely new footage.  2.5 deserves it's own seperate page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.2.70.143 (talk) 01:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Jackass 2.5'' 

message: The reception section is overly positive, there are no negative reviews mentioned. --Mika1h (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: I removed the "written by" section on the infobox becuase:
*1. The movie was written by the entire cast and some crew, not just Cliver and Preston
*2. The source says "Screenplay, Sean Cliver, Preston Lacy." which is inaccurate since there was no screenplay for Jackass Number Two.
I don't since there should be a "written by" section in the infobox because its not very suitable for this type of movie. You would have to list every single cast member and also the director, producers and everyone else who came up with ideas. -- Coasttocoast (talk) 00:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you have a source that proves this source inaccurate and not just your own personal opinion, I will take the word of variety over some anonymous wikipedia editor. Don't remove sourced material unless you can prove that it is incorrect. — OcatecirT 01:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I have to say I'm inclined to agree with the removal.. it's disputed, and seems empirically clear that Lacy and Cliver didn't exactly "write" the film, certainly not on their own, and not the way this would usually be understood. I appreciate it's sourced, but I think it's fine to leave it out. <FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">z</FONT> talk 01:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Written by

message: On Preston Lacy's official Myspace (Link found on jackassworld.com)He wrote down that he is one of the writers for the jackass franchise, and he goes on to state, Jackass the show, The Movie, Number Two, Jackass 2.5, and Jackass 3. Wait he said Jackass 3, is that credible evidence?Onepiece226 (talk) 17:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Preston's Myspace

message: Correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’ the stunts and pranks listen in the wrong order?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.67.148 (talk) 21:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong order