lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2005 FIBA Americas Championship

message: I can not figure out why FIBA Americas has Panama with a 2-7 record and is missing wins for almost all of the countries.  I cannot understand why a 5-3 Panama team was bypassed for a 4-4 United States team for the knockout round.  I cannot figure out why that 4-4 United States team would be seeded above either the 5-3 Brazil or 5-3 Venezuela team.  If someone can explain this (I left above the standings the obvious problems), I'd be greatly appreciative.  Pat Maher 02:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Standings

message: The 2005 title was the third one to the brazilians. Brazil won the 1988 championship. FIBA archive, for some unknown reason, just changed the winner and runner up places on the final match. I've already sent various e-mails to FIBA-Americas to correct that and got no response. On the talk pages of the championship in both english and portuguese wikipedia links to various reliable sources as brazilian basketball federation, puerto rican basketball federation, El Nuevo Herald (biggest american spanic newspaper), The San Juan Star (biggest puerto rican newspaper) and argentine newspapers confirms that FIBA archive is wrong. I'll not rewrite or copy and paste it here. I'll just post here the links to the english and portuguese wikipedia articles talk pages. 
I corrected the article and erased the links to the FIBA archive site with wrong information. 189.19.115.171 (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third brazilian title
Talk:Fort Stotsenburg

message: I was stationed there in 60s, and remember it as "Stotsenberg," but memory is a fragile thing. The hits on internet searches find "Stotsenburg" mostly in Wikipedia. Others such as this one (http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/pam/2007/02/11/bus/hotel.stotsenberg.opens.in.clark.economic.zone.html) or this one (http://www.pacificwrecks.com/airfields/philippines/clark/index.html) among a number of others use the spelling "Stotsenberg." One of the sites devoted to former AB also has it as "Stotsenberg": http://www.clarkab.org/history/index.htm. I suppose the only definitive answer would be in military archives, although the name of the soldier, identified in that web site as "Col. John M. Stotsenberg" might have some confirmatory value. Another site devoted to the former AB also lists it as "Stotsenberg": http://zcap.freeyellow.com/pix3.htm. -- MaxwellPerkins 07:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Arlington National Cemetery website records the name on his tombstone as "John M. Stotsenburg". See this link: http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jmstots.htm — • Kurt Guirnela • ‡ Feedback 02:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stotsenberg instead of Stotsenburg? 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Confederation of Revolutionary Trade Unions of Turkey

message: Translating "devrimci" as "progressive" is not correct. In some cases the word can be translated as "reformist", but "revolutionary" is the generally correct way of translating it, and surely is what was intended by the founders. One needs only to take a look at the same article in german and french, where it has been correctly translated as "Revolutionären" and "révolutionnaires" respectively. The same word can also be seen in the following articles, where it has been translated correctly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devrimci_Yol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devrimci_Sol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devrimci_Sosyalist_%C4%B0%C5%9F%C3%A7i_Partisi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devrimci_Kom%C3%BCnist_Partisi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.251.245.252 (talk) 01:44, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that must be changed. Its indeed "revolutionary", not "progressive". --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Devrimci" = "Revolutionary", not "progressive". 

message: DİSK means "Devrimci İşçi Sendikaları Federasyonu", which translates for "Confederation of Revolutionary Trade Unions of Turkey". "Devrimci" literally means "revolutionary", not "progressive" by any means. The title shall be changed in that manner to "Confederation of Revolutionary Trade Unions of Turkey". --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of DİSK
Talk:Arizona woodpecker

message: Can someone please cite the original research on which the split is based? Thanks. Dysmorodrepanis 02:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. According to the AOU's 42nd supplement, it involved LIGON, J. D. 1968. Observations on Strickland’s Woodpecker, Dendrocopos stricklandi. Condor 70: 83–84. They also cite JOHNSON, R. R., L. T. HAIGHT, AND J. D. LIGON. 1999. Strickland’s Woodpecker (Picoides stricklandi). In The birds of North America, no. 474 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D. C.  If you have access to that.  Hm, Ligon both times—maybe the 1968 paper is the original research.  —JerryFriedman 22:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: The image on the page is currently up for deletion.  This image is currently available only under an un-free license.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (Contr.) 21:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image on page up for deletion 
Talk:Camp Claiborne

message: Need to know all the Divisions that did training at this camp. 
I have created units serving and added what I could find. 
--Sattmaster (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division Serving 

message: Camp Claiborne today is mostly full of trails an mud and stuff like that. 72.155.251.126 (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today 
Talk:Camp Upton

message: I'm looking for information on Camp Upton that I simply cannot seem to find. My grandfather was stationed there as WW2 wound down and was placed in charge of rehabituating returning soldiers. I'm looking for information on where that level of information can be found. If info on Camp Upton based GI's can be found - such as a list of people who were stationed there during which years - would it be appropriate to include it? 192.155.59.254 (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A list of names wouldn't be quite appropriate, but a link to such a resource would be good. As you probably know, Camp Upton is now Brookhaven National Laboratory. You might try their Visitor Center at (631) 344-3333 or their General Info Hotline (631) 344-4636 (dial 9 for BNL information). – ClockworkSoul 23:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query 

message: the following Internet Archive links  represent linked material that has 404'd
https://web.archive.org/web/20120208151735/http://www.longwood.k12.ny.us/history/upton/uptonhome.htm [Fev 8, 2012] 
https://web.archive.org/web/20071001003923/http://www.newsday.com/community/guide/lihistory/ny-history-hs709a,0,7616454.story?coll=ny-lihistory-navigationFrom
but that latter appears to be a copy of this wikipedia page ? 
Bill in Boston aka N1VUX (not a registered user) 
72.93.39.69 (talk) 21:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Until I removed them, the article had several (good) sources describing the camp’s  use as an internment center which described the national makeup of the internees - mostly european citizens, and all enemy aliens. I removed them because they were being used to make a claim which they did not support: that the camp’s full capacity was used to intern American citizens of Japanese ancestry.  One remaining paywalled source from the New York Daily News is now remaining to support the claim. Could someone with better visibility to it take a look? Qwirkle (talk) 14:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed, no mention of Camp Upton occupancy in Daily News article. Dan Bloch (talk) 20:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was finally able to open another NYDN cite; the caption to photo 15 in the gallery stated that it had held interned Japanese citizens.So, the article had at least four, count ‘em, four anticites. Jayzus. Qwirkle (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy.
Talk:List of Tales of Legendia NPCs and locations

message: Is this a board game? A computer game?  A MUD or MMORPG?  Who's the vendor?  Who are the developers?  What's the premise of the game?  Needs an introductory sentence or two to provide context. --Bookgrrl 02:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, much much better :) --Bookgrrl 17:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

message: It's Soul Fighter. Thanks for helping me with the article's minor glitches and the renaming of the page. I'ts been a pleasure to work with you and help Wikipedia expand it's articles at least, in my specialty. I'm curently playing the game so all information is straight from the source and derived from the game. Soul Fighter 12:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the new name.  Sometimes it's a few hours before redirects "take" everywhere, I'm not sure why but I've run into it before. Where's the link that doesn't work?  I can check it out.  --Bookgrrl 12:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix stuff 

message: Forget it Bookgrrl I fixed it. I took the codification by accessing the edit this page of Grune's article page. It's all cool now thanks for your concern fellow Wikipedian.Soul Fighter 12:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixed 

message: At the end of this article it states that Grune transforms into "a thousand white feathers"....  I don't quite recall the game ever stating it was exactly 1000, and if someone counted them I doubt it would come out as such a nice number...  So, if anyone besides me wants to edit that, they can.  Or not.  Whatever.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.243.126.208 (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A thousand feathers?
Talk:Camp Merritt, California

message: So I'm cleaning up the article to make it more consistent with Camp Merriam, California and I notice what appear to be some factual problems in the section "Commissioning."  First of all, General Otis (who was actually a Major General) succeeded Merritt.  Merritt actually went to the Philippines with the Eighth and served a commanding role there for a short time.  -- but this is a minor problem.
The other problem is, according to my research, the order cited (General Order 7 of the U.S. Expeditionary Forces) is incorrect.  That order, from what I can tell, was given in 1972 by the Commander in Chief of the Philippine Army (not the U.S. Army), and was issued by President FERDINAND E. MARCOS of the Republic of the Philippines and Commander in Chief of the Philippine Army.  This is a rather embarrassing error and needs to be corrected ASAP.
In the meantime, I am flagging the section as disputed.
Any help with this would be welcomed.  If nobody volunteers in a reasonable time and the issue still hasn't been resolved (if indeed there is one), I will delete the questionable material.  Thank you, --John (Johnnie Bob (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with "Commissioning" section
Talk:Griffin Book

message: Added background information concerning a successful lawsuit due to information in the Griffin Book.  I think this is relavant because there may be a perception that the Griffin Book contains cheaters.  The book is (or was in some peoples opinions) another tool used by Casinos to manage their profit - and as private institutions I don't see any problem with this, but I also think its fair to point out that the black lists contain not just those that break the law and cheat, but also those that a Casino thinks may be breaking the law, or they simply suspect of being "too good" and just don't want to do business with.  So this addedd text is not to paint the list in a negative or positive light, just to make it clear that the list contains information thats more like a "bad customer" or a "you dont want this guy in your casino, he wins too much" list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.24.219 (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment
Talk:Camp Kilmer

message: This camp is accally a school now,(I go there so I decided to look it up) it is a prvite school K-12 called Timothy Christian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salveevery1 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Found some cool pictures of camp kilmer in old Livingston college yearbooks
example: https://archive.org/details/rockvolumeii00rutg/page/12/mode/2up
here's the list of yearbooks
http://livingstonalumni.org/lc-yearbooks
Chriscush765 (talk) 14:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting photos
Talk:Fort Wingate

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Caserma Ederle

message: What exactly does "dependent" mean in "A soldier assigned to a tour of duty at Caserma Ederle is normally permitted to bring dependents for the Permanent Change of Station."? The link redirects to a disambiguation page. Why is it in the introduction of the article? It seems to be a detail to me. Cleanup and explanation needed. Thanks. --Edcolins 22:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The person that wrote that means dependent (law) - in this case, a spouse, children under 21 or 23 (23 only if a full-time student) or permanently disabled, parents if permanently disabled - the problem is, that's a red link right now. — CJewell (talk to me) 14:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I added the link. Even if red, it is better than to have a link leading to the disambiguation page, IMHO. A stub could be created with the matter already in the disambiguation page (three lines, not that bad...) --Edcolins 20:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical and cleanup-restructure 

message: Family members is now the common usage recognized within the DoD community. The term military dependent is somewhat dated (i.e. Pre-1990). 
v/r
Peter Rimar—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chitrapa (talk • contribs) 03:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Members 

message: This is taken from the article page:
The 509th Infantry Regiment (Airborne Brigade Combat Team - ABCT) was previously placed under the command of SETAF in 1973 and later deactivated in the mid-1980s; it was replaced by the 4/325th Infantry Regiment (82nd Airborne Division). The 4/325th ABCT was composed of three line companies (including a COHORT company - Angry Alpha), a headquarters company, a combat-support company, and a 105mm artillery battery.
I believe the original author may be mixing unit designations from different time periods.  If 509th Inf Rgt was a "combat team," it would have been a "regimental combat team" or "RCT."  Also, 4/325th Inf Rgt would be more correctly written as 4-325 as it is a regiment's battalion as opposed to a brigade's battalion which would be written 4/325.  Also, 4-325 would better be referred to as a battalion task force as opposed to a brigade combat team considering it was a battalion sized unit with additional attachments.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.196.186 (talk) 06:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature for units
Talk:SAGEM

message: SAGEM Sigma 30 is a product made by SAGEM, and I'm not sure if it should have its own article.  Should it be merged here?  Is it sufficiently notable that it should have its own article?  Google produces 64 hits, first of which is wikipedia.  WLU (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from SAGEM Sigma 30 
Talk:Letterkenny Army Depot

message: Letterkenny Army Depot is on the list of the EPA's superfund sites I think this should be included on the main page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomguydoingresearch (talk • contribs) 07:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  superfund 

message: a small town used be where the depot is now im not sure what the name of it was but if anyone could find out that would make for an interesting note on the main page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomguydoingresearch (talk • contribs) 07:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  people relocated  
Talk:Anniston Army Depot

message: "the only depot 'not' capable of performing maintenance on heavy-tracked combat vehicles and their components"?
That's an odd claim to make for the US Army's heavy-track combat vehicle maintenance center...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.5.105.137 (talk) 09:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hawthorne Army Depot

message: Makes for a crazy road layout visible on OpenStreetMap: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.485845&lon=-118.581619&zoom=12
We could put this map on the article.
-- Harry Wood (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is cool looking(even cooler when seen from the 95). But I don't think it's quite right for the article. Also some of that is actually train tracks. Sumsum2010·T·C·Review me! 04:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crazy road layout 
Talk:Zun

message: This is one of seven bronze vessels our Early Chinese Art class will be working on this semester. Amjomartin (talk) 15:39, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Fort Jackson, Louisiana

message: I was under the impression that it was Fort St. Phillip (not Fort Jackson) which Leander Perez threatened to make into a prison for civil rights protestors.  Does anyone have source information either way?  Or both?  Thanks.
JustABystander (talk) 21:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil Rights Prison? 

message: It would be very helpful to have the current status of the fort listed here - whether the interior can be visited an at what times.  128.46.220.172 (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Status of the fort 
Talk:Persistent truncus arteriosus

message: References would be nice for the clinical apsects.GetAgrippa 19:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References Needed

message: My younger sister was diagnosed with this defect. There is no mention of the fact that there are multiple types of Truncus. I know there is at least four, but I am not knowledgeable in the differences between them. 24.213.101.206 04:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a section on the classification. --Arcadian 05:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Types I-IV

message: There is some controversy over the naming of this condition. It is also known as "Common Arterial Trunk", as the truncus arteriosus is an embryologic structure.
See: Morphogenetic considerations on congenital malformations of the outflow tract. Part 1: common arterial trunk and tetralogy of Fallot. MM Bartelings, Adriana C. Gittenberger-de Groot 
I'll be adding a redirect page here from Common Arterial Trunk, and including hte alternat title in the first sentence.--FunkyDuffy (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Moshe Kotlarsky

message: Recently, some major changes were made to this article, shortening it significantly. I am not happy with the longer version, but also don't like the wording of the the shorter version in some places. Perhaps we can all try to make some compromise version that should have the best of both. Debresser (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Toronto International Film Festival

message: Due to the fact that I have a vested interested in the links section (i.e. the "TheGATE.ca" link is to my website) I feel someone else should deal with this down the road, but I've noticed a number of IPs logging in and adding links to useless sites or else reordering the list of links for no good reason. 
In my opinion there are lots of links that would be helpful for this article, but I'm thinking there are a lot popping up right now just to take advantage of the next festival. Please watch for this if you can folks. --The GATEKeeper 02:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Please, help create a complete list of TIFF awarded films (or TIFF awards in general). Hoverfish 07:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of TIFF awarded films 

message: The Lead section was far too long for an article of this kind, so I have relocated content and created new sub-sections.--Soulparadox (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Lead section 

message: The ownership of TIFF (Toronto International Film Festival) has no been revealed on this page.
Who is the owner and/or the organization responsible for TIFF?
Is TIFF an agency of the Ontario Government?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.60.181 (talk) 18:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not an agency of the Ontario government. It's a charity, incorporated without share capital under the laws of Ontario under the corporate name "Toronto International Film Festival, Inc."  You can get further information by doing an Ontario corporation name search or Government of Canada charities listings search (registration number 119304541RR0001). Some further information including links to annual reports, and a list of the board of directors, is at www.tiff.net/about/. Mathew5000 (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   Good find. Perhaps you can incorporate those information into the article? OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner of TIFF 

message: I'm not sure how to update this but the logo looks like it's out of date, link to new logo below: https://storage.googleapis.com/ff-storage-p01/festivals/logos/000/003/069/large/TIFF_logo_CMYK.jpg?1491418405
 17:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect logo 

message: There is no mention of Indigenous filmmakers at the festival. In the context of this festival's location in Canada, a colonial state on Indigenous land, this is a large gap in knowledge of the types of films this festival screens. It assumes the imagined community of Canada as homogenous, whereas this is a contested point in the country. Furthermore, Indigenous filmmakers' in Canada are making and have made notable achievements in filmmaking that have been recognized at this festival. It would be nice to see this highlighted.SilverScreen'sSilverLining (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous Contributions