lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Denise Ho

message: *move remaining album info to album pages.
*pull aliases out of history (prior to my first edit)
*take useful info out of chinese trivia (currently commented out) and delete remainder (eg, watermelon)
*expand content
Nateji77 15:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: what's the name of the magazine? what issue (number or, better yet, date) of the magazine where this interview was published? Nateji77 13:10, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Singtao interview

message: To add to this article: at least a few words of explanation as to what exactly the "seditious materials" Ho has been accused of disseminating are. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:David Lindsay (novelist)

message: Your "disambiguation" page calls him Scottish.  Which is it?
--squadfifteen
I rewrote the article to make this clearer. Although Lindsay was not, of course, Scottish, his family was and he spent much of his childhood in Scotland. Moreover, his influences (Norse mythology, the "Scottish Calvinist" tradition of fantasy (George McDonald, Robert Louis Stevenson, "Confessions of a Justified Sinner") etc. were clearly Scottish. 
The main reason for considering him Scottish is that he has nothing to do with the rest of English Literature. He looks (slightly) less weird when considered to be Scottish.
I'm not entirely certain why the reference to Colin Wilson's "The Haunted Man" has been removed as spam - the book does exist. Agingjb (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This entry states that A Voyage to Arcturus greatly influenced C.S. Lewis. Using the dubious criteria outlined in an above comment, and employing the same logic, I guess Wikipedia should refer to Lewis as a Scottish author.74.215.219.209 (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Natural density

message: i added this line under examples.  i haven't figured out how to type math  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesusonfire (talk • contribs) 10:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The set of all square free integers has density (pi^2)/6. 

message: I have seen the term asymptotic density be used to refer to more than just the density of subsets of the natural numbers.  For example, see the text Number Theoretic Density and Logical Limit Laws by Stanley N. Burris. Adammanifold (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asymptotic Density 

message: Would it be possible to remove the "too technical" banner if a natural language explanation of the "definition" section were given, along side an overview of some of the set theory notation signs?Edaham (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Set theory notation 

message: Could the article define "upper density" and "lower density", instead of just give an example?  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind - they are defined as "upper asymptotic density", etc.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define? 

message: Hello!
I think these two definitions
 \underline{d_1}(A) = \liminf_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a(n)}{n} 
\underline{d_2}(A) = \liminf_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{n}{a_n}
are not equivalent.
Consider  as a union of two arithmetical progressions 
 A=\{3\cdot n\}\cup \{5\cdot n\}, n \in \mathbb{N}.
Then 
 \underline{d_1}(A) = \frac{1}{3}+ \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{15}=\frac{7}{15}
 \underline{d_2}(A) \le \frac{1}{5} 
 Pepka-prygni (talk) 08:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower asymptotic density
Talk:Past

message: Is the only difference between future and past is that we can remember past, but cannot remember future? 93.178.119.100 (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the difference between future and past?

message: Has a lot of bells and whistles, but still a Stub in terms of content.
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 19:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: The past is a mind category that we use and a thing that doesn't quite exist as a tangible thing but it exists nonetheless, it's just that humans are time constrained in the time continuum. And we don't change the past, we think we do, put what we change is our impression of the past. Not the past itself.
--Rodrigo Cornejo 01:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The past does exist 

message: Why don't we include the past-related things into their category?
:The past is the object of such fields as history, archaeology, archaeoastronomy, historical linguistics, geology (historical geology), paleontology, paleobotany, paleoethnobotany, palaeogeography, paleoclimatology, cosmology
– or rather, their categories should be included, if they exist.
Also: memory, retro, antiquarian, fossil, history.
Adam78 00:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Past]]? 

message: We have prepared a new "light cone" image. The intention was to imply the correct scale of space-time relative to the observer. Interstellar light-years vs years scales seemed appropriate. If you have any comments please post them at the Graphics Lab entry. Dhatfield (talk) 22:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New "light cone" image 

message: The memories of j.k.rowling is what she left and did not include her past but only memories i think she should have so we can remember her for rememberance also so we can change the better and have the better in projects about her  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.158.6.106 (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  memories 

message: The article says that the past is an important topic of study in fields such as..and then includes "memory" in the list. I was unaware memory is a field of study (the psychology of memory is). Vorbee (talk) 19:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Memory as a field of study
Category talk:Archaeological artefact types

message: I believe the new type Rhyton should be added.  It is a stub at the moment.  By adding it, maybe it will help the development of the Rhyton page.  Michael McAnnis,YumaAZ
:Hi Michael, to add an article to a category page, do the following: Edit the article you want to add. At the bottom of the article text add this: Category:Archaeological artefact types. Save the page, when you come back here you will see that it has been added to the list. adamsan 16:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of New Artefact
Talk:Shravasti district

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  JubalHarshaw 16:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:21 Club

message: :and 21's days of subverting the authorities are clearly over
Is this encyclopedic? --Dpr 15:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: This article reads like a press release written by the restaurant's publicist. It has almost nothing of interest to the reader that isn't marketing-driven. --K72ndst 15:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like subtle spam to me, the author has been putting dorothyparker.com links all over wikipedia (I'm currently cleaning them up).  I suggest AfD'ing this article. 67.117.130.181 03:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to delete it, the place is culturally significant or whatever but it does still read like a publicity handout for tourists, no historical or industry context is given. Gwen Gale 07:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does seem to be improving in quality with regards to WP:advert, and I definitely think it has a historical quality that makes it noteworthy.Bradfordschultze (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing? 

message: I was reading up about the speakeasy history of 21 Club; about the series of levers that disposed of the drink during raids, etc. Was this commonplace during the era? I know they had to develop various methods to avoid prosecution, but was 21 the only one to use mechanical methods? Siyavash 05:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about speakeasy history 

message: 'all painted to portray a uniformly Caucasian skin tone.' 
Is this really necessary to say? It's not really all that important.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.36.238.123 (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Further Question

message: The page mentions that George W. Bush dined at the 21 Club prior to becoming President...but also that he was dining there when he found out that he was picked as Reagan's running mate.  It was George H.W. Bush who was Reagan's running mate, so I'm not sure where the mixup is...but something in the article is necessarily incorrect about the Bushes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.21.3.1 (talk) 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Bush? 

message: The "Environment" section lists 35 jockeys; 33 outside and two more inside. The very bottom of the "History" section mentions a total of 37. Were two removed since? Are two of them somewhere else? If so, where? Is one just incorrect? SeafoamSpirit (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Jockeys
Talk:Ahilawati

message: Is Ahilawati another name for Maurvi? I've placed Maurvi as the wife of Ghatotkacha and the mother of Barbarika. Imc 16:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm just leaving this out here for the future reference of readers and editors: Ahilawati is not a character who is featured in the original Mahabharata as this article previously suggested; she, along with her son Barbarika, appear in western Indian folklore, and they were likely assimilated in retellings of the epic in the region and identified with Ghatotkacha, who is a bona fide Mahabharata character.  Chronikhiles (talk) 12:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Action of 12 October 1798

message: No ones been here for a very long time, but just as a courtesy I am leaving a notice that I am preparing a new, expanded and sourced version of this article in my Userspace and it should be up here in two/three weeks. If anyone has any comments then by all means drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:13 Going on 30

message: There's two DVD releases of this film. Both need to be added to the article. Tebor 19:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the source?21:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Needs DVD Section 

message: In the lede is a sentence which begins, "When she eventually does emerge, [...]" Emerge from what? A caccoon? A storm drain with a red balloon? There's nothing in the lede that gives any context here. As I have not seen the movie, I truly do not know what is being referenced here, so I can not fix this. Can someone please fix this? — al-Shimoni (talk) 17:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, anonymous IP editor 71.10.34.208 (00:28, 2021 June 16 UTC), for fixing this. I finally saw the movie, finishing it minutes ago, but I see you fixed this. — al-Shimoni (talk) 12:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emerge from what? 

message: This is from the Quad City Times: http://web.archive.org/web/20040531165110/http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1027525&l=1&t=Art,+Movies,+Theatre&c=4,1027525
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There are already reviews from several notable critics, is there something particularly special about this publication, or this critic, or does the review say something especially insightful you feel is missing? -- 109.76.135.9 (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film review
Talk:WQED-FM

message: From the WQED-TV talk page: Should we merge the WQED-FM and WQED-TV articles into one WQED article (like the WGBH article), or should we keep them seperate and change the WQED article from a redirect to the TV station to a disambiguation page? (WQEX can remain seperate, as it isn't quite a public television station these days...) 24.61.119.222 16:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or disambiguation? 

message: There is currently a disambiguation page titled WQED. Rather than having three articles (WQED, WQED-TV, WQED-FM), they could all be merged into WQED. The radio page is a stub, and the television page gives information about both. It would provide for easier navigation of the pages--Questions99 (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  One article vs. three 

message: Some history would be interesting.
I came here from KQED hoping to find some earlier history of public radio.
I have been very pleasantly surprised by how much has been written on Wikipedia about radio - thank you!
69.181.192.2 08:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: Re: "WQED-FM is a member station of National Public Radio and an affiliate of Public Radio International."WQED-FM has never been affiliated with NPR. (WESA (FM) is Pittsburgh's NPR station.) Re: PRI, it's more accurate to say that WQED-FM carries 16 hours of its daily programming from YourClassical, a service of American Public Media. Source: https://www.yourclassical.org/performance-today/stations and also compare https://www.yourclassical.org/playlist/classical-24 with https://www.wqed.org/fm/playlist. (6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. weekdays are hosted locally by Jim Cunningham, 2:00 to 6:00 p.m. weekdays are hosted locally by Anna Singer.) Thanks! PGHneighbor (talk) 03:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: *The claim of affiliation with NPR was deleted.
Regards,  Spintendo  21:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 29-SEP-2023
Talk:Satsvarupa dasa Goswami/Archive 3

message: * who is the Goswami in the infobox img, the left one or right? --Redtigerxyz (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the left of the image (other persons right). --Wikidās ॐ 16:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I have changed the Title in infobox to "Satsvarupa dasa Goswami", not "Sannyasi", but at the second look, it is the title of the Latest posting (ie in his case is Sannyasi). I do not have any other way to justify it being his name, ie it is not the title of the infobox, its the title of the posting in religious order. I have to work a bit more for  WP:LAYOUT comments above. In some cases one should note that Prabhupada is title used after 1968 not before. I agree that consistency matters more here, so will revise.Wikidās ॐ 09:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look into the rest of the changes shortly. I had combined sections at the end to make a continuous read. More to follow. Wikidās ॐ 13:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: "Post: ISKCON guru from July 1977" - This is wrong, right? I mean, he didn't start acting as Guru until after the departure of Srila Prabhupada. If this is in referral to the ritvik letter, of course, that refers to him taking the position of a priest, rather than guru. Chopper Dave (talk) 21:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I always took it that Prabhupada had selected number of gurus to act when he was getting ready to leave. At the time when Prabhupada was present the gurus he selected were acting as his ritviks in terms of initiation, but were clearly pointed out as gurus. Thus the date of posting starts from July 77 appointment. As per Prabhupada's earlier words: "When I order you become guru, he becomes regular guru." I run it by the quotation by Ron Rhodes: 2001 - "Before Prabhupada died in 1977, he selected senior devotees who would become gurus." Of course the topic was made controversial, and thus if any other date, rather then from July 1977, it needs a document to support it. It could be March 1978 (the date of first initiation in India), but I do not have any reliable source to this effect, the letter of appointment is a reliable source. Any suggestions? Wikidās ॐ 21:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect information

message: It reads like an advert "of special mention" - massive block quotes advertising his books etc etc. I have to go out for a couple of hours but will be turning the flamethrowers on it later.  --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It have been rewritten. Some statements were dropped because they made little sense or did not have any sources to back them up. Wikidās ॐ 13:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs a complete re-write
Talk:WQED

message: I've been asking on the talk pages for WQED-TV and FM: Should we merge those articles into the WQED page (of which this talk page is for) (like the WGBH article), or should we keep them seperate and change the WQED page from a redirect to the TV station to a disambiguation page? (WQEX can be left alone, as it isn't quite a public television station these days...) 24.61.119.222 16:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or disambiguation?
Talk:Latin Patriarchate of Alexandria

message: Wow, this is cool, I didn't realize there was a Latin Patriarch here too...was this one established during the Fourth Lateran Council? Did it have anything to do with the Fifth Crusade, which was also planned there, and was headed for Egypt? Adam Bishop 16:34, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:List of hospitals in Portland, Oregon

message: Either this list needs to be renamed to hospitals in Oregon, or everything not w/i Portland city limits needs to be moved to a List of hospitals in Oregon. I would go with the later since there are not enough hospitals in Portland for much of a list.
Then I think anything without licensed hospital beds should be removed, such as medical clinics. Thoughts? Aboutmovies 21:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up
Talk:Danny Schayes

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Blue and white pottery

message: The image used on this page is currently copyrighted and claimed under fair use. It ought to be relatively easy to make a replacement for it, one either in the public domain or under GFDL; any help would be appreciated. Shimgray 16:57, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are too many and repetitive images hoarded in this article. This is in violation of WP:IG. The article is not an image gallery, for that purpose Wikimedia Commons exist. If a specific item is described, it can have one image to illustrate it. Others can be referenced in-line. Request trimming down and streamlining this mess. Gryffindor (talk) 09:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is a visual subject, and your views, expressed here and elsewhere, are out of line with community views on how to illustrate articles on art. How many images do you think the article should have? And why? Have you looked at any FAs on art? There is nothing in WP:IG supporting "If a specific item is described, it can have one image to illustrate it. Others can be referenced in-line." Please don't make up policy. The article could of course be improved, andf the captions made more informative, but the selection is reasonable & the solution is to expand the text rather than reduce the number of images. Of course, if you are not interested in the subject, the images will appear "repetitive".  I respectively suggest you spend your time cleaning-up your new articles, such as Akogi ware - only 2 bare url refs, both to ebay!! Johnbod (talk) 10:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images 
Talk:Alligator Rivers

message: — JIP | Talk 16:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

message: The article states that the three rivers are called the East (West, South) Alligator Rivers then goes on to describe the East (West, South) Adelaide Rivers.  Some confusion here? Tonywalton  | Talk 14:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We've let the typos live for too long here! These three rivers are Alligator. The Adelaide River headwaters are nearby too. Thankyou for noticing, sorry nobody responded promptly. --Scott Davis Talk 11:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alligator or Adelaide? 

message: I have created redirects from the three individual rivers as they all had incoming links. I also linked to them from here as the one sentence here could become a summary to a full article on each river.--Scott Davis Talk 11:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirects 
Talk:Division ring

message: It is slightly misleading to say that French "corps" stands for English field. First "corps" is not necessarily commutative, second, French "champ" (which literally means field) is used by French speakers to indicate a "corps commutatif", i.e., a field.
cerniagigante (talk) 10:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am French, and professional mathematician since more tham 60 years. I never heard "champ" used for "commutative field". If "champ" has had this meaning, this was before the second world war. D.Lazard (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  French terminology
Talk:WBZB-FM

message: Does anyone know what current AM station held the WLOA call letters while it was running the same programming as WRRK during the WLOA-FM days? 24.61.119.222 17:14, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, WURP article says it was WRRK's former sister AM station, which makes it that mysterious WLOA (AM). 24.61.119.222 17:25, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  WLOA (AM) question
Talk:Kanpur Nagar district

message: The population given in the article is not supported by the citation given.  The figure shown in the 2011 District Census is 4,581,268.  The figure quoted in the article appears to be a combined figure for Kanpur Nagar and Kanpur Dehat, that is for the former district which was abolished in 1981.  Skinsmoke (talk) 10:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 
Talk:WJFA

message: Could someone move this article to WAVL, just like several other articles already have been? 24.61.119.222 17:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio Stations, the proper title format for an AM radio station is WXXX (AM). Bearcat 18:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:WMNY

message: Could someone move this article to WBGN, just like several other articles already have been? 24.61.119.222 17:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: I merged WKPA to this article, but have not done anything cleanup other than double-link check. meatclerk 07:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:WJJJ-FM

message: Could someone move this article to WJJJ, just like several other articles already have been? 24.61.119.222 17:56, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: Could someone move this article to WJJJ, just like several other articles already have been? 24.61.119.222 17:57, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: Could someone move this article to WJJJ, just like several other articles already have been? 24.61.119.222 17:58, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This apparently was done.  No, I don't know how three comments appeared. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?