Talk:Team Role Inventories

message: Hi, new reader here. Been checking the entry for my work and have to say the way things are described are very much on the positive and euphemistic side.
"There was a game that included all factors, very scientific, blabla" ... is not the way to explain it. Same with lots of the sentences in the validity part.
Not sure how, but if I knew I would add the "objective?" box to the top of this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.69.224.161 (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. A few of the users associated with creation of this article have usernames which include Belbin. As such, this article has been tagged to indicate that the content may have been provided by someone with close connections to the material. Further, there are a large number of team role inventories which are utilized in schools and workplaces per my understanding, so it seems inappropriate that this wiki focuses entirely on Belbin's product. ---MW--- (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of writing - written by Belgin (Infomercial?) 

message: If it's factually untrue, does even the published opinion of the primary researcher (Belbin, in this case) belong in an encyclopedia uncountered (argued against - I can almost remember the relevant word for this idea, but can't quite)? Formerly the IP-Address 24.22.227.53 24.16.160.93 07:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia policy - What I wrote above 

message: The test includes 360-degree feedback from observers as well as the individual's own assessment of their behaviour, and contrasts how they see their behaviour versus how their colleagues do.
I'm curious whether the observer's own Belbin roles are factored into this analysis (ala "inter-type relations").  If anyone has access to this knowledge I'd greatly appreciate having it entered into the main page. --Formerly the IP-Address 24.22.227.53 02:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  360-degree feedback 

message: Oh come on, whatever you think of this stuff (and I think it is a load of tendentious nonsense at best, it is certainly notable, 40000+ hits on Google for Belbin personality Hpengwyn 21:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag

message: I removed the external links again per WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK. --Ronz 04:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linkspam

message: Maybe we should merge this one with  article on Belbin himself?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.128.166 (talk) 19:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Belbin?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Team Role Inventories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120919133846/http://www.tmsdi.com/profiles/an-integrated-approach/ to http://www.tmsdi.com/profiles/an-integrated-approach/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426010443/http://unofficial.capital.edu/faculty/scroft/grproles.htm to http://unofficial.capital.edu/faculty/scroft/grproles.htm
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified