Talk:Hindu Forum of Britain

message: I am concerned the phrase "It has been accused of links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, an extremist Indian organisation" may be libelous.  While the above argument by Relata refero is correct in its conclusion the reference to RSS can be applied to label it "extremist", there is no reference cited linking HFoB to RSS.  This could (falsely?) lead the reader to associate the two in a way that has not been established.  
As the statement is sure to be challenged, it must cite a reference.  I have left it for now, but if one is not provided, that statement will need to be removed under WP:Libel until the statement can be sourced.  --BizMgr (talk) 05:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its in the lead, so it shouldn't cite a reference if it merely summarizes a statement referenced elsewhere in the article; some of the relevant references are here. Relata refero (talk) 09:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libel  

message: The two (fairly outdated) discussion sections above talk about neutrality issues in the article. I think most of the POV has been removed. For example, the claims both for and against HFB have been put in more context. If there are any more queries, please say so. GizzaDiscuss © 09:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good move on your part, Gizza. This will definitely move the page away from being a lightning rod for edit wars.Pectoretalk 13:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV/Criticism 

message: My 2 edits 
:(cur | prev) 21:23, 28 February 2014‎ Clapkidaq (talk | contribs)‎ . . (11,102 bytes) (+4,957)‎ . . (add text deleted withouth explanations , see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.wikipedia/u4dJIwvCQc4) (undo)
:(cur | prev) 21:20, 28 February 2014‎ Clapkidaq (talk | contribs)‎ . . (6,145 bytes) (-30)‎ . . (rm pov introduced by pov warrior, see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.wikipedia/u4dJIwvCQc4) (undo)
were reverted because the source is not good.
But these should not be so diffult to source. I suggest to editors of theis page to look at the website of the HFB for sources on this. THANKS>--Clapkidaq (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the text 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hindu Forum of Britain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930055334/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=db942155-5814-4b10-bce7-659b75d7e21a&MatchID1=4488&TeamID1=8&TeamID2=10&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1120&PrimaryID=4488&Headline=Hindu%20Forum%20of%20Britain%20condemns%20report to http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=db942155-5814-4b10-bce7-659b75d7e21a&MatchID1=4488&TeamID1=8&TeamID2=10&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1120&PrimaryID=4488&Headline=Hindu+Forum+of+Britain+condemns+report
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930041239/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=18f83799-43c0-45fc-a1ea-119e9958823b&ParentID=db942155-5814-4b10-bce7-659b75d7e21a&MatchID1=4488&TeamID1=8&TeamID2=10&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1120&PrimaryID=4488&Headline=British%20Indian%20official%20linked%20to%20VHP to http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=18f83799-43c0-45fc-a1ea-119e9958823b&ParentID=db942155-5814-4b10-bce7-659b75d7e21a&MatchID1=4488&TeamID1=8&TeamID2=10&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1120&PrimaryID=4488&Headline=British+Indian+official+linked+to+VHP
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified