lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deaths of philosophers

message: In the article "Sophists" by Harry A. Ide (p. 863) in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, he mentions these late reports of the death of Protagoras.  Further specifics aren't mentioned. KSchutte 01:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Attribution Needed

message: This is a wierd idea for an article! I guess it has novelty and interest value though. Anarchia 04:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is rich secondary bibliography on the matter. See WP:IDONTLIKEIT. --Omnipaedista (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

text: I like it. Only for philosophers, though. Anybody else's would be meaningless. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: You have go to be kidding!
Talk:Târnăveni

message: Up until the early twentieth century, this town was part of either independent Transylvania (administered in Hungarian/German), Hungary, or the Austro-Hungarian Empire. "Târnava Mică" county did not yet exist, and Blaj and Cetatea de Baltă were officially called by their Hungarian names. Now, if we're going to insist on calling 98%-Hungarian villages like Csíkszentdomokos by their Romanian names on Wikipedia (in this case Sândominic) simply because they currently exist within Romania (I actually like this policy), isn't it consistent to call places like Blaj and Cetatea de Baltă and (most glaringly) "Târnava Mică county" by their Hungarian names when we talk about a period in history when they were ruled by Hungarians as part of Hungarian states?
Calling Kis-Küküllő by some Romanian translation of its name is exactly the same as calling judeţul Mureş "Maros megye." "Maros megye" is a useful phrase and should be included here on Wikipedia, but to put it as the first variant is a little strange and somewhat politically suspect.
Can we all agree that we should give first references to places in the official language of the administration at the time? (i.e. by all means call it Blaj [Balázsfalva] after the Unirea, but before it, stick to Balázsfalva [Blaj]) ?
If someone disagrees with me, please leave a comment! Hubacelgrand 01:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "For a few centuries until the half of the XX century, the city proved to be of great importance within Transylvania as the capital of Hungary's Kis-Küküllő county". This is incorrect since in recent history, Transylvania became part of Hungary only in 1866. I suggest removing "Hungary's" which is out of place. Icar 07:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another contradiction
Talk:Center Grove High School

message: This article, while semi-well written, needs to be reworded to sound less like it was written by a student.  There are too many detailed sections (sports games) that aren't needed.  The "Typical school day" section (now "School Format") is also a bit odd-sounding, with information that a reader probably doesn't need to know?  Either way - Made a few little edits for consistency, removed the "affluent district" line (self-praise, anyone? You source it, then go right ahead), and added a "citation needed" for the "Greatest game in IHSAA history" comment. Also, may look into bringing some of the figures and stats up to date? Gpia7r (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalization 

message: Today, I removed a ton of junk from this article and updated the stats. Removed everything on the school district. It should have its own article, and none of it was referenced. Removed all the self-laudatory junk on athletics. Will replace with a neutral athletics section, listing the sports offered and the state championships won. It will not inlude marching band, because that is not a sport. If a reference is available, anyone is welcome to re-add the BOA championship in the music section. It will also not include ultimate frisbee, as that is not an IHSAA sanctioned sport. If a reference is available for all those supposed state championships, feel free to add them under clubs. Keep in mind that there are several things we do not discuss in school articles. Individual students and staff are never mentioned (except the principal) unless they are notable. We don't discuss mundane things like class schedules. We only discuss achievements when they are the highest obtainable achievement (usually state champ) and we do not discuss individual achievements at all. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 12/1/2015 

message: This school has had many controversy that should be added 208.38.250.6 (talk) 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some one needs to add the many controversy
Talk:Adi Da/Archive 4

message: It is correct to say that Ken Wilber has spoken both positively and negatively about Adi Da (and Adidam). It is also correct that since the mid-1990s, he has publically differentiated between the teacher (Adi Da) as "problematic" and the written teaching. He has also specifically requested that "This is why, as a blanket statement, I can no longer—and do no longer—recommend Da’s community for the typical spiritual aspirant, and I have asked his community to cease using my name in this regard." Those editors wanting to expand beyond the basic statement that Ken Wilber has spoken both positively and negatively about Adi Da and Adidam should accurately convey the true balance and context of those statements, be fair, and try and maintain a NPOV. Otherwise, the original statement can stand.Dseer 22:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Ken Wilber's Statements 

message: Popular author Ken Wilber has offered both positive and negative opinions about Adi Da, and has concluded that "the teaching is one thing, the teacher, quite another." However, he has consistently described Adi Da's spiritual teachings as the most profound and important of our time.[10][11]
I have changed this to New Age author Ken Wilber has offered both positive and negative opinions about Adi Da, and has concluded that "the teaching is one thing, the teacher, quite another."[10] However, he has consistently described Adi Da's spiritual teachings as the most profound and important of our time. [citation needed]
Removing the Peacock term 'popular', and requesting a citation that wasn't in either of the sources provided. 
Sfacets 14:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sfacets, a fresh look here is fine. All known public statements by Wilber regarding Adi Da are listed here: . Ken Wilber has not publically retracted his effusive praise of Adi Da's teachings, though one can draw conclusions from the inconsistencies between his statements, his more recent endorsements of other gurus critical of Adi Da, and his public silence on Adi Da since 1998. If you want to wordsmith the language after reading the link, go ahead and give it a shot. The critical statements that Adi Da has been praised by a number of popular authors (Watts and Wilber being the most famous) is best sourced here, athough what is left out is useful background and context behind these statements, since the older endorsements were made before Adi Da's Avataric assertions and behavioral issues were widely known: . The linked works of Trunk, Lowe, Fuerstein and Wilber statements above all differentiate between the value of the teaching and the behavior of the teacher himself. Again, if you want to make this clearer based on the sourcing, make a proposal. I just think its better fleshed out here first --Dseer 07:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ken Wilber
Talk:Silvestre Dangond

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.silvestredangond.com/biografia.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Saskatchewan Huskies

message: To add: Notable alumni who played in top leagues or tours (NHL, NFL, CFL, NBA, MLB, PGA etc.)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shootmaster 44 (talk • contribs) 01:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The football program at the University of Saskatchewan is one of the more successful programs." Is this comparing the football program at the University of Saskatchewan to 1) other sports programs at the University of Saskatchewan, 2) other football programs at Canadian colleges and universities, or 3) all sports programs at Canadian colleges and universities? --Khajidha (talk) 14:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please clarify
Talk:List of infections of the central nervous system

message: I plan to move this page to list of central nervous system infections, change formatting somewhat, and make the list of diseases more specific.(example;I will remove the page encephalitis, from the list, as this is to vague, and replace it with more specific types of encephalitis, such as west nile encephalitis, herpes simplex encephalitis, and so on) Immunize (talk) 20:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article should be moved to "....infections". But I am concerned that red links are being created because of simple spelling mistakes, (see History). Graham Colm (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In looking at the history of this article and the List of central nervous system infections article, I'm not sure what has happened, but it seems to me like this page should reside at List of central nervous system infections (plural). Should we  it to make way for this article, or am I missing something? PDCook (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't fathom what Immunize has done this time, but the article should be plural and reside at List of central nervous system infections, or better still List of infections of the central nervous system (a red link I know). If you have the time to sort this mess out, I would be grateful. Graham Colm (talk) 18:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go ahead and move it to List of infections of the central nervous system; that will avoid the necessity of a CSDG6. PDCook (talk) 18:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes
Talk:Henry Quinteros

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Blackwell channel

message: This really is math! From the title, I thought I'd be reading about Blackwell's channel, the one on cable TV where only the worst-dressed women are featured!  ;^>  DavidCBryant 01:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm surprised

message: This article asserts that Sergiu Gel'fand found the capacity formula for the Blackwell channel. Another article, Israel Gelfand, says that his father derived the formula. I'm not sure which is right, but this contradiction ought to be resolved.  DavidCBryant 12:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The contradiction was my error. The paper is definitely by "S.I. Gel'fand" but whether that is Sergui Gel'fand, I can't actually say. It seems right, as I replied on my talk page to your comment. - grubber 16:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Gel'fand?
Talk:Animal-Vegetable-Mineral Man

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Miss (snooker rule)

message: What does "require snookers" / "snookers being required" mean?  It's the word "require[d]" that's confusing me. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]   ‹(-¿-)› 19:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Require snookers"

message: The "better to concede many points but leave a safe position" passage needs elucidation; it is the first mention of points in the article, and many incoming readers will be completely new to the game. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]   ‹(-¿-)› 19:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Points

message: "Professional foul" needs to be added to the Glossary of cue sports terms. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]   ‹(-¿-)› 19:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. West Brom 4ever 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Term

message: Does this rule hold in informal/amateur games without a referee? I.e., if you're playing at a pub or in a regional league, can you call a "miss" on your opponent?  Article doesn't address this. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]   ‹(-¿-)› 19:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well.. i did call it while playing for fun in a pub and i was quite right, however, nobody was used to it so i just started my break with difficult red. West Brom 4ever 01:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In informal games
Talk:Aequiprobabilism

message: It seems that aequiprobabilism has had at least some kind of influence in modern philosophy and theology, for instance in the debates surrounding the encyclical Humanae Vitae and other discussions on the morality of war in Vietnam and Japan. There is a very jesuitic element in both those debates which involves some kind of lesser evil and an accompanied intervention of an influential political or ecclesiastic authority. ADM (talk) 00:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern debates
Talk:Aqueduct (band)

message: Seeing as how the link to Aqueduct's 2005 album clearly cites major music review sites shows that Aqueduct is of concern of enough people and notable by Wikipedia's standards. They also released a new album a week ago, so their popularity should fluctuate because of this. They are also signed to Barsuk records which is a notable music entity. Both of these are criterion clearly stated in the music notability section. Because of those 2 reasons I'm removing the tag at the top of the article. I encourage anybody with concerns to voice them on the talk page. --CountCrazy007 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern of subject of article 
Talk:Túpac Huallpa

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Fredrika Bremer

message: There is a town and county in Iowa named after Frederika Bremer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.250.139.207 (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Just lost several hours of expansion thanks to Chrome's cut-and-paste crash bug. I can't contemplate redoing it all, but Agneta Pleijel's essay here has many details and turns of phrase that would improve the article if someone would like to take up the cross. — LlywelynII 17:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ugh
Talk:List of Swedish royal consorts

message: This list now includes several people living before the year 1000, all of which are of debated historicity at best (see Semi-legendary kings of Sweden). Should we keep them while acknowledging this, or wipe them out altogether? -- Jao (talk) 21:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best way would be your first alternative. In the introduction, it could be inserted, that the queens uptil 1000 are not confirmed. To wipe them out altogether would be a little brutal. We do not know if they excisted; they might have, and if they didn't, it is still information - about legends or not. --85.226.235.206 (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  When it comes to lists about king's, the semi-legendary kings are often included. It should be the same with queens. I have added Yrsa. --85.226.235.208 (talk) 11:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest queens 

message: The title of this article on Swedish wiki have been changed to (In English): List of Swedish queens and regent consorts. I have mowed this page accordingly. --Aciram (talk) 13:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Just included these.
# 1066-1067 : (Name unknown), wife of Eric VII Stenkilsson (Erik Stenkilsson)
# 1066-1067 : (Name unknown), (first time), wife of Eric VIII the Pagan
# 1067-1070 : (Name unknown), wife of Halsten of Sweden
# 1070-1075 : (Name unknown), wife of Anund Gårdske
# 1075-1079 : (Name unknown), (second time) wife of Håkan, widow of Eric VIII.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.42.61 (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I included this one: * 970-975 : Ingeborg Thrandsdotter, wife of Olof (II) Björnsson.--85.226.44.201 (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: So umm, someone want to tell me what "ascession" means? ;) -- œ™ 22:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice spelling in the tables guys
Talk:Randy Post

message: The article does not read well and probably has too much detail. Shorter and cleaner would make it read more easily. --Stormbay (talk) 17:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like a lot of it was copied from somewhere. I did what I could with the source I had, but a lot of it probably does still need to be rewritten and sourced. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 03:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean up/rewrite
Talk:Conrad of Thuringia

message: I would agree that Conrad of Thuringia is an acceptable title for the article, as the phrasing has been  used in English books old and new. Olessi 02:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Was Konrad von Thüringen not involved with defenses during the Mongol invasion of Hungary? 163.202.48.126 (talk) 12:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongol Invasion
Talk:Minor characters from the Inheritance Trilogy

message: Roran and Nasuada are two of the three main point of views in the Eldest. If you ask me they should have their own articles like several other story have for characters.
Morzan was a main character in Eragon and a antagonist in Eldest showing he should have his own seperate one aswell.
And Elva is a really important character aswell for her events.
I can understand for people like Angela and Solebum who make somewhat of a minor appearance but these four are really important in atleast one of the two books so far.--Animasage 01:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As if often the case with "epic fantasy" novels there is a huge cast of characters, many of which are important to the storyline in some way. WP:FICT, the guidline for article writing on fiction, lays out the rules for central characters. In light of the fact that there are many important characters in this genre of literature, unlike standard fiction which often has only one or two central protagonists and/or antagonists, the job of defining who gets their own articles is alot harder. The best way to do this is to ask "Is this character known outside of the universe to non-fans?" In the case of say Han Solo, a non primary protagonist known outside of the Stars Wars universe, a seperate article would be appropriate. The characters you name and fundementally important supporting characters to the cental protagosnist, the character that drives the storyline, in this case Eragon. I don't feel that they are notable enough on their own to warrant their own article nor do I think that they support that much additional notable material outside of what is mentioned of them here, enough to "fill" their own article. Having "one's own article" is not a status or trophy but a editorial decision, one that doesn't make sense here. NeoFreak 13:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roran, Morzan, Elva and Nasuada included? 

message: In the article there is a statement that Paolini has said the Angela in the book is nothing like his sister. Can anyone find a citation for this? I can't find it anywhere. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pyreforge (talk • contribs) 22:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Angela

message: Brom is most definitely NOT a minor character. I think he deserves his own page. Also, seconded on Elva, Nasuada, and Roran updates. Quadrius 18:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brom?!
Talk:Guest House (TV series)

message: Are there any parallels between this show and Fawlty Towers?  Geo Swan (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  question... 

message: where is Sarwat Ateeque now, Is she alive ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.63.25 (talk) 11:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarwat Ateeque ???
Talk:Conduit (character)

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  13:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Semi-classical music

message: In conducting a few web searches, I've found that, while the term semi-classical music does function as it is used in this article, it also has a number of other contexts that relate to musical movements in such countries as India and the United States. I'm thinking it might help to differentiate between these, or even to include (Pakistan) after the title so as to be clear. As always, let me know if you think differently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred.Pendleton (talk • contribs) 23:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation?
Talk:Tuffi

message: This storry is 100% true and not a storry Sneaker 79
The German article says it was a 10 meter jump and the elephant was 4 years old. 
don't know whats correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.116.222.24 (talk) 23:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tuffi was born 1946 in India --Saviour1981 (talk) 08:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)