Talk:1st Infantry Division (United States)

message: Under the Vietnam War summary, it might be more readable to rewrite it, including a listing of the various operations (which avoid linking to the Rolling Stones). That listing would provide useful additions to the Vietnam War category of lists of operations.--Buckboard 10:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Both brigades have a history that preceeds that of the 1st Infantry Division. SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 05:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st and 2nd Infantry Brigades 

message: It seems to me that the attached supporting units, like the two tank batalions, should be added given the role they played in the divisional plan --Mrg3105 11:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OOB for Omaha 

message: With the modularization of the Army, the current structures and unit affiliations are no longer correct. For instance, 1st Sqdn, 4th Cavalry, now belongs to a Brigade at Ft. Riley, it is not a Separate. I can correct some of the incorrect information, but most of it will be difficult, since even published Army campaign plans for modularization are not going into effect as they had been planned. I guess that is the beauty of transforming and fighting a war simultaneously.—Andrew 17:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units? 

message: Why is there a separate section for the motto in the article when the exact same information is already conveyed in the unit infobox? Quite repetative, wouldn't you agree? --ScreaminEagle 17:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm. Still seems awfully silly to me. If there were some history put in there about the motto or some other information besides just the motto itself, I could certainly understand its inclusion. But as an exact copy of something almost next to it, definitely superfluous. --ScreaminEagle 23:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto section 

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 4, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?:  Article contains many red links and should be in a written format instead of trivial lists.
:2. Factually accurate?:  Artilce only cites one source, the rest of the article needs references.
:3. Broad in coverage?:  Article discusses many key points in its coverage.
:4. Neutral point of view?:  No WP:NPOV problems.
:5. Article stability?  Article has been stable.
:6. Images?:  Article contains images.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far.
— JA10 T · C 22:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: Are you kidding? The invasion occurred in 2003, there was no new invasion in 2006, it's occupation, if anything. C'mon, let's get truly NPOV.--Vidkun 01:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 invasion of Iraq 

message: http://www.2bct.1id.army.mil/Primary%20Sites/headlines/New%20Unit%20Designations.ppt This presentation outlines the changes in unit designations for the 2 "Dagger" Brigade. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesusmoose (talk • contribs) 21:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformation PowerPoint Slides 

message: In Vietnam narrative there's an interlink to the Battle of An Lộc. Narrative states battle occurred during the first half of 1969 and then claims 1st I.D. left Vietnam in 1970, but article about the Battle of An Lộc says the battle was fought in 1972.
Was there another battle named An Lộc fought in 1969 or what? --Ukas (talk) 13:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep.Intothatdarkness (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time-travelling Division? 

message: I have read several times that in WWI that had Plan 1919 been carried out that the US 1st Infantry Division was going to be turned in the US 1st Parachute Division and dropped on the city of Metz to capture the bridges when the Allied forces approached the city.Graham1973 (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st Parachute Division

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.riley.army.mil/Units/4IBCT1ID/2BN16IN.asp
** In 16th Infantry Regiment (United States) on 2011-05-25 01:55:00, 404 Not Found
** In 1st Infantry Division (United States) on 2011-05-25 06:53:04, 404 Not Found
** In 16th Infantry Regiment (United States) on 2011-06-01 19:22:18, 404 Not Found
** In 1st Infantry Division (United States) on 2011-06-10 03:56:02, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.army.mil/CMH/matrix/1ID/1ID-Cdrs.htm
** In 1st Infantry Division (United States) on 2011-05-25 06:53:04, 404 Not Found
** In 1st Infantry Division (United States) on 2011-06-10 03:56:27, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 03:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.1id.army.mil/documents/1BCTDocuments/100317145232.pdf
** In 1st Infantry Division (United States) on 2011-05-25 06:53:04, 404 Not Found
** In 1st Infantry Division (United States) on 2011-06-10 03:56:51, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 03:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: What is the Wikipedia policy regarding external links whose only purpose seemingly is to draw business to a commercial website, in this case www.combatreels.com? I've no doubt that the DVDs are interesting to many people, but there is no information on that site that isn't carried in the Wikipedia article itself. Seems kind of inappropriate to me. Is it?--172.190.116.12 (talk) 02:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. If they were actually footage of the division, they might be permissible, but it seems the links are only there to sell merchandise. Wikipedia is not here for that. I've removed them. —Ed!(talk) 20:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercialism 

message: The reference link for the Big Red One patch is now out of date. It should be http://www.1stid.org/patch.php. If there are any other questions about the Society's website I can help, as I am the webmaster. Jpflyers929 (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up. I've fixed it. —Ed!(talk) 20:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead reference link 

message: How can the second possibilty of the origin be a gray piece of cloth when the patch has always been on green?  There was an Army prior to the disaster called the ACU. Never saw a gray 1st ID patch prior to that ever, and I collected shoulder sleave insignia for 30 years.  Should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radar2102 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSI 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 1st Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080617065216/http://64.78.33.72:80/history/index.cfm to http://64.78.33.72/history/index.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130313031237/http://www.riley.army.mil/NewsViewer.aspx?id=6952 to http://www.riley.army.mil/NewsViewer.aspx?id=6952
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090512004009/http://www.riley.army.mil:80/bigredone/divisionsong.aspx to http://www.riley.army.mil/bigredone/divisionsong.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 1st Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055745/http://www.1id.army.mil/documents/1BCTDocuments/100317145232.pdf to http://www.1id.army.mil/documents/1BCTDocuments/100317145232.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 1st Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100609010022/http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/spdes-123-ra_ar.html to http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/spdes-123-ra_ar.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riley.army.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/469340/bro-cases-colors-prepares-for-afghanistan/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070711175148/http://www3.sdstate.edu/Academics/CollegeOfArtsAndScience/MilitaryScience/Alumni/DistinguishedAlumni/DePuy/ to http://www3.sdstate.edu/Academics/CollegeOfArtsAndScience/MilitaryScience/Alumni/DistinguishedAlumni/DePuy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 1st Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riley.army.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/469340/bro-cases-colors-prepares-for-afghanistan/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070807110748/http://www.riley.army.mil/Units/4IBCT1ID/2BN16IN.asp to http://www.riley.army.mil/Units/4IBCT1ID/2BN16IN.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140115102438/http://www.1id.army.mil/bigredone/divisionsong.aspx to http://www.1id.army.mil/bigredone/divisionsong.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722180523/http://www.1id.army.mil/bigredone/magazines/ to http://www.1id.army.mil/bigredone/magazines
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130602011224/http://firstdivisionmuseum.org/ to http://www.firstdivisionmuseum.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1st Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riley.army.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/469340/bro-cases-colors-prepares-for-afghanistan/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140507054033/http://www.riley.army.mil/AboutUs/History.aspx to http://www.riley.army.mil/AboutUs/History.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is the 1st ID SSI listed as being obsolete (ceased being used in 2015) and replaced by the golden bordered CSIB, when the current website for the 1stID , still uses it? Was there an official change sometime in 2015 that I didn't realize? SamSennett (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st ID SSI 

message: The article says "The original table of organization and equipment (TO&E) included two organic infantry brigades of two infantry regiments each, one engineer battalion; [...]".
The link to "organic" says that organic units are permanent sub-units of a larger unit, and are generally specialized. Well, these are infantry brigades; those are about as unspecialized as they come. And note that the adjective "organic" is attached to the infantry brigades, not to the specialized battallions listed after. So it looks like we mean simply "permanent".
"Organic" appears to be a term of art, otherwise it wouldn't need a wikilink. So can we just replace it with "permanent", since that's evidently what we mean? That would make it easier for a layman to understand, without detracting in any way from the present meaning.
MrDemeanour (talk) 19:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition of organic is apparently outdated. Organic has been used in the US military to describe units that are part of a larger unit's structure in a semi-permanent sense for some time (at least since before the Vietnam War). Permanent doesn't really work well, as those units can be shifted (or even disappear depending on the organization idea of the month). Intothatdarkness 19:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organic