Talk:Looking for Alibrandi (film)

message: I'm going to bulk this up. A lot. I have an assesment task on 'Looking For Alibrandi', and writing a wikipedia article is good practice. Scalene 07:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest Update 

message: Can I propose that the article be split up into two separate articles, one concerning the book, and the other concerning the film? It seems that the article, while it begins to talk about the book, seems to switch confusingly between the two. --JB Adder | Talk 05:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. You are amazing. I just read it quickly, but I didn't notice those details. Feel free to correct. Scalene 08:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: God know why people think the movie is so good. I read the book in class, it was ok, then we watched the movie which really disappointed me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil Ian Manning (talk • contribs) 04:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose a split 

message: The second paragraph needs some cleaning up to make it encyclopaedic. El T 01:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopaedic 

message: Quote from the article:
"And she discovers the horrible secret about her family's past."
Yea, but what secret would that be? Please, I am not a native speaker of English and did not get it from the movie. 
So what is the "secret of the Alibrandis"?
:Easy. Her mother is also a love child - her Grandma had an affair. Scalene 08:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a native English speaker and it took me a few minutes to get it :P, I think a fluent Italian would be better... -Deon555talkReview 01:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What IS the the "Alibrandi's secret"? 

message: The plot synopsis is one of the book not the movie. I cant remember the movie that well so could someone fix it up. Evildoctorcow 03:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not True - Actually, it is a synopsis of the movie. They are similar, but there are some differences. Scalene 10:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The plot synopsis 

message: :Image:Looking For Alibrandi Film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Looking For Alibrandi Film.jpg

message: The box office earnings seem to be incorrect. For the film to have grossed $8,280,888,345 (this would be 8x as much as Titanic) every person in Australia (population approx 23,000,000) would have had to have spent $300 on the film. Additionally, the link that this figure uses as its source does not load on my computer.
110.175.83.233 (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Office