Talk:Goo Goo Dolls

message: I have been asked to state why I keep reverting the user who keeps insisting that ""NBC holiday album" should be listed instead of simply "single".  The reason for this is that there is no reason to believe that this song was written for this NBC album.  Also because it was released as a single and if anything it will be included on their next album "Let Love In" and should be listed under that instead. Hope this helps --T-rex 03:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. That's all I needed to know. --† Ðy§ep§ion † 03:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My reverts

message: Just came across this site which talks about an MTV video with the Goo Goo Dolls done with the Alaska Railroad. Worth adding to the article? Feel free too... cluth 08:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alaska

message: I fixed the addition that said stay w/ u was number 7 on the billboard 100 b/c it was 7 on adult top 40 not billboard 100. --70.246.16.184 08:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stay With You

message: I corrected the album sales status, based on http://www.thebulletin.com/archives/2006/september/betterdays.htm , and the chart numbers to reflect the numbers available from the All Music Guide and Billboard online.  I also took the liberty of correcting the order of the singles to reflect their dates of release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.18.131  (talk • contribs) 21:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart Numbers and Album Sales

message: Does anyone have more information about the UK singles chart numbers for the Goo Goo Dolls?
There is very litte information present in the article, and it hasn't been updated in ages.
If someone could post revised numbers and cite the information source, it would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.18.131  (talk • contribs) 18:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the table of singles to reflect the UK Singles Chart. I used everyhit.com. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Singles Chart Numbers

message: AVRIL LAVIGNE ROCKS!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.185.82.242  (talk • contribs) 20:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, it already got deleted. Did you include copyright details? Chubbles 20:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of the band

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls What I Learned About Ego, Opinion, Art & Commerce.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls What I Learned About Ego, Opinion, Art & Commerce.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Superstar Car Wash.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Superstar Car Wash.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Live In Buffalo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Live In Buffalo.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Jed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Jed.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Hold Me Up.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Hold Me Up.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Gutterflower.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Gutterflower.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Dizzy up the Girl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Dizzy up the Girl.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls Black Balloon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls Black Balloon.jpg

message: :Image:Goo Goo Dolls - Let Love In.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Goo Goo Dolls - Let Love In.jpg

message: The rationale for not speedy deleting this article is that it is a very notable band, deleting the article as a whole would harm Wikipedia. The wording is largely the same as it was a year ago. Other sites with similar wordings could well have copied from Wikipedia, none that I found looked like the definitive source of the information. If there is doubt about whether this is a copyvio, re-write the article. Mallanox 23:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: I am beginning to cleanup the article, adding references as appropriate, and deleting any incorrect information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.136.82 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 22 July 2007
:Who are you then? TheGamerDude 05:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive Cleanup

message: Someone (70.49.139.165) insists that "Just the Way You Are" and "Fallin' Down" should not be included in the discography because they were not "radio singles" despite their physical existence as promotional singles.  I question this assertion--where were these singles sent if not to radio?--but more to the point, I assert that this is no basis for exclusion.  A true DISCography is a list of releases.  Whether such releases were intended for airplay does not matter.  If these actual, physical singles are to be excluded, the section should be renamed "Airplay chart" or something.  At the very least, these additional singles should be mentioned in a footnote to the chart.  Or they should be listed in the discography with a footnote stating that they were not intended for airplay.
Scratchtasia 21:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles Discography disputes

message: String of Lies was released in Superstar Car Wash, which was released before A Boy Named Goo.
If Takac ever screamed "Where's our fucking money?", it would have been in a live concert ad-lib
I also can't find any sources that back this anecdote up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.119.156 (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: String of Lies Anecdote

message: Notice how their logo never capitalizes the "t" in "the", it's because the name is just "Goo Goo Dolls". "the" merely appears to make the name more natural in certain sentences. But even then, you still see it absent a lot. Like no one goes to a "the Goo Goo Dolls" concert, you go to a "Goo Goo Dolls" concert, right? Newbliss (talk) 22:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been prior discussions about this. As such I moved it back, and think it should stay at Goo Goo Dolls short of a formal request for renaming. --T-rex 20:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if you noticed on their covers Newbliss (starting from "Dizzy up the Girl" in 1998 onward), they all list them as "The Goo Goo Dolls" (stylized, of course) on it.  The only exceptions since then have been on the covers of the compilation albums "Ego, Opinion, Art and Commerce" and "Greatest Hits Vol. 2", which both feature largely older pre-"Dizzy up the Girl" recorded material.  Without knowing for certain, it would appear they changed to using "The Goo Goo Dolls" on their album covers since the beginning of their mainstream success.  However, without a verifiable source, it is probably better to leave this article at "Goo Goo Dolls". 65.93.172.103 (talk) 18:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not THE Goo Goo Dolls

message: Why would Buffalo proclaim two days to be Goo Goo Dolls day? And why pick independence day as one of them? This seems unlikely. Not cited anyway...
--24.18.62.22 (talk) 06:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the Goo Goo Dolls gave a large free concert in Buffalo on independence day. --T-rex 20:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, there are 2 Goo Goo Dolls days in Buffalo. I believe the first one was chosen after they came home after ABNG (and Name) became a big hit and they were welcomed back home again at a concert in Buffalo. I think it was explained on the GGD's episode of VH1's Behind the Music, so check that for references. Splendor (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Goo Goo Dolls Day?

message: There's a line in the current version about the song "Iris" whose meaning isn't clear; I can rewrite it to clarify if someone can tell me which way.  "He wrote this song while breaking several's years of writer's block and sobriety."  Does that mean that he broke several years worth of sobriety, meaning he fell off the wagon, or does it mean that he achieved sobriety at the same point as breaking the several years of writer's block? Critterkeeper (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Sobriety' question

message: I belive the goo goo dolls are grunge because of they're lyrics and raspy vocals and musical style and they look grunge.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.46.91 (talk) 18:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: grunge rock

message: *This band is ALTERNATIVE ROCK and HARD ROCK.
*post grunge i s pearl jam,and bush.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.248.44.147 (talk) 06:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT POST GRUNGE 

message: Goos arent Post-Grunge and Grunge especially, and never was before! their style always been (1993-present) a pop-rock music with classic sound and guitar riffs, as Alice Cooper, Bon Jovi, etc. but now their music just a little has become a modern rock, you know...
Post-Grunge is Creed, Fuel, Staind, Seether, Default, Shinedown, Submersed, Breaking Benjamin and more like this...
Post-Grunge is not Goo Goo Dolls, Lifehouse, Live, REM, Powderfinger...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelirock (talk • contribs) 01:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  music style 

message: In 90's they played post-grunge, of course their music was more polished than Bush's or Silverchair's, who played in best grunge traditions, but more radio-friendly.
Post-Grunge bands first of all are STP, Bush, Live, Candlebox, Foo Fighters, Silverchair, Collective Soul and so on. Live is definitely post-grunge!
P.S.
It's ridiculous to compair Goos With Alice Cooper!)...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:SV (User talk:S.V. • contribs) 01:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POST GRUNGE 

message: Just a point, but in the lede it is claimed the had a hit single with "Dizzy Up the Girl" which was an album. The single was "Dizzy"119.15.65.1 (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles 

message: I added in the single Home's realease date seeing as it had yet to be added here but was already included in "Something For The Rest of Us"'s article, and on top of that, already accorded it's own article. We need to keep these articles in sync! lol :P  Bliss 182 (talk) 08:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Single Released June 8, 2010 

message: I've changed the genres in the infobox to reflect the only one mentioned in the article with a reference (Ref 20). That's Pop rock, although I've reinstated the more general Rock as an obvious parent genre, too. If anybody wants other genres, they'll need to come up with references for them, as is the Wikipedia way. Opinions about grunge, post-grunge, or country-jazz-Thai fusion don't matter. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 00:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Referenced genres (the only kind that count)

message: This article reads like a 7th grade book report. Someone with a sense of the English language needs to rework every section. I've started making changes, but it's maddening. Welcome to Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.158.123.179 (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly written

message: What kinda source want you to confirm that Goo Goo Dolls are some kind of post-grunge ?
I'm going to give some source:
*AllMusic
And check the definition here for Post-Grunge, they are one of the top artist on that genre, even on the albums and some songs with post-grunge feels are showed on that article. Check it!
*Post-Grunge
Other websites
*Post-Grunge Clasic
*Top Post-Grunge songs ---> Goo Goo Dolls is there!
*Post-Grunge Music Tabs
*Worst Post-Grunge Bands
*All the GGD's albums reviewed in Ultimate-Guitar have all the Post-Grunge genre (check one by one if you have some doubts)
 
Do you need something else to confirm that?
--200.8.18.229 (talk) 06:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-Grunge

message: The page for Grammy Award song of the year says "Iris" was nominated in 1999. This page says it was 1998  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.216.53 (talk) 08:36, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmy Nomination Year 

message: I removed this line from the page because, after viewing the list and counting, it is incorrect.  Katy Perry, The Black Eyed Peas, and Nickelback also have three songs on the list, while Maroon 5 and Kelly Clarkson have four, so the Goo Goo Dolls don't even have the most on the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.226.114.43 (talk) 18:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Goo Goo Dolls are the only musicians to have three songs chart on the list." 

message: The article states the band was "formed on Memorial Day 1986". It looks odd (to me), as 
a) other group's pages aren't so specific about what day they were formed on and 
b) Memorial Day is only a holiday in the US, and even the link to the Memorial Day page on Wikipedia doesn't tell me what that date was in 1986.
Would it be reasonable to ask that someone with more knowledge about US holidays either changes it to read an actual date, or remove reference to a date/holiday in 1986 so that it matches other group's pages please?
Many thanks
MarpoHarks (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In older interviews from ~1988 the bands often mentions they had their first gig on Memorial Day 1986 so that's why I added it to this page. I guess you're right it's not in line with other bands pages so I'll fix the date back to 1986 (someone changed that) and remove the Memorial Day part. --Splendor (talk) 06:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Splendor MarpoHarks (talk) 10:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Formed on Memorial Day 1986" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Goo Goo Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061120175649/http://arts.enotes.com/contemporary-musicians/goo-goo-dolls-biography to http://arts.enotes.com/contemporary-musicians/goo-goo-dolls-biography
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070706001112/http://www.ultimate-guitar.com:80/news/video_news/goo_goo_dolls_transforming_experience.html to http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/news/video_news/goo_goo_dolls_transforming_experience.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080715043514/http://www.indianapolismotorspeedway.com:80/news/11152/The_Goo_Goo_Dolls_To_Play_At_IMS_During_Allstate_400_At_The_Brickyard to http://www.indianapolismotorspeedway.com/news/11152/The_Goo_Goo_Dolls_To_Play_At_IMS_During_Allstate_400_At_The_Brickyard
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100715214658/http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/entertainment/music/Goo_Goo_Dolls_John_Rzeznik_on_GDLA_20090918 to http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/entertainment/music/Goo_Goo_Dolls_John_Rzeznik_on_GDLA_20090918
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Goo Goo Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071012194335/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/artists/googoodolls/articles/story/5927020/goo_goo_dolls_want_label_to_forget_their_name to http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/googoodolls/articles/story/5927020/goo_goo_dolls_want_label_to_forget_their_name
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071002062226/http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/googoodolls/articles/story/5929327/goo_goo_dolls_lawsuit_coming_to_a_head to http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/googoodolls/articles/story/5929327/goo_goo_dolls_lawsuit_coming_to_a_head
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100121202625/http://twitter.com:80/Johnrzeznik1 to http://twitter.com/johnrzeznik1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Goo Goo Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090919032451/http://www.daveschulzmusic.com:80/about/index.asp to http://www.daveschulzmusic.com/about/index.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Goo Goo Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160220172932/http://echoorganization.org/index.php to http://www.echoorganization.org/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: External links modified

message: i think it youwld be funny to say that they were called the good good dolls because there a good band. i dont think there a very good band but it would be a preetty good joke. i know theres not suppose to be jokes on wikipedia though so im not putting it in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Handbabyy  (talk • contribs) 11:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: what if they were called the good good dolls

message: Hello everyone!
I have selected this article to work on for a technical editing class that I am currently in right now. My plan is to read through the article and focus on adding sources/making sure all of the information is correct since this article is about people who are still alive. I welcome any help/advice/correction to my editing process!
Thank you!
Malfoymanners (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Edits 

message: Just went through this article and made bold edits, including removing unsourced text, removing unreliably sourced text, & removing unnecessary detail. 74.67.6.88 (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits