lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of tanks of the United Kingdom

message: Someone should add the Vickers light tanks to this article. GMRE (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Found them at: Light tanks of the United Kingdom. I'll add that link. GMRE (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added them at A4 and A5 based on one internet source, but just found another that says different, so not certain that I'm right.  Lkchild (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Light tanks

message: I figure this page either needs British WW1 tanks added (heavies & mediums) or updated to say post-1918/1924 tanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whyme943 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  World war 1 tanks
File talk:Cyberstorm command screen.png

message: As this is the first wiki page I've ever added a picture to, I've had a little difficulty with the fair use rationale. I understand the need to prevent breech of copyright. What I don't understand so well is why this image has been picked up twice and yet the other image on the article MissionForce:_CyberStorm was not.
It would appear that the two deletion attempts were by an automated process. I would request that if a human is reading this page, think again before deleting the image.
*Would the game's creators have added a "Print Screen" feature if they didn't want you to use it?
*Would the game's publishers object to an image of the game appearing in a fairly positive article on the internet?
*Is the image in any way reducing the publisher's ability to make revenue from the game?
*Is it ironic that Internet bots created by Humans to patrol Wikipedia are interfering with an article about a game where Humans are fighting for survival against Robots created by Humans to serve as their minions but that ultimately revolt and attempt to destroy their creators?
That last question is rhetorical. Of course, if proved correct, I'll be hunted down and killed by a wayward wikibot.
Anyway, I'd better go. My computer is making scarey noises....GordonTG 23:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair Use Rationale
Talk:Archibald Boyd

message: Original author was George C. Boase, who died before 1900 according to DNB Vol. LXIII. Copyright expired no later than 1970. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DNB content is PD because
Talk:Frigate navy

message: Googling "Frigate Navy" returns lots of links to Marines In The Frigate Navy, a book about the US navy of the early 1800s, and essentially nothing else. Except for Wikipedia mirrors. Ditto Google Books, which suggests that it's just a simple slang term for the US navy of those times. In my opinion this article should be condensed down into half a sentence ("the US Navy was occasionally known as a frigate navy, as its largest units were frigates"(source)), inserted into United States Navy, and then deleted. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Arnold Shaw (writer)

message: It is abundantly clear from reliable secondary sources and from all official records (birth records, census, marriage records, etc.) that his name at birth was Arnold Shukotoff.  However, the Arnold Shaw Center here gives his birth surname as Sokolof.  This is quite odd - they have his papers, so you would expect them to know his name.  Or, is there another explanation?  Can anyone resolve this mystery?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sokolof
Talk:343d Wing

message: Toward the end of the History, the crashes of two C-135s are mentioned as notable events.  These aircraft did not belong to the 343d, but to another wing at Eielson.  I would proposed deleting mention of them here, and adding them to the Eielson AFB and 6th Air Refueling Wing articles if they are not already mentioned there.--Lineagegeek (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-135 Accidents 

message: G'day, as per the request on WP:MHA, I have reassessed this article. Overall, I believe it meets the B class criteria. One thing I noticed, though, is that the lead is five paragraphs. Per WP:LEAD, I believe that the maximum is four. If possible, I suggest merging a couple. Anyway, thanks for your efforts. Good luck with taking the article further. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I usually run into the opposite problem, since I usually expand articles whose original author had a one sentence lead.  Never noticed the max befor, I think we can make this four easily.  Thanks for the advice --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead
Talk:Maldonado (surname)

message: *Lorenzo Ferrer de Maldonado - adding the link here for future reference; Maldonado was a Portugese explorer who claimed to have discovered the Northwest Passage; see "Apocryphal Voyages" chapter here.Skookum1 (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: redlink

message: The idea that 'Maldonado' is the Spanish form of MacDonald is ridiculous on the face of it. The name is a compound of Spanish 'mal' meaning badly, and 'donado', meaning given. Thus 'maldonado' is usually translated as 'ill-favored', although 'misbegotten' might be a better translation.  Honestly, the Spanish form of MacDonald! Is there a Scottish form of Mendoza?But I don't want to get involved in an edit war with people named Maldonado. I'll leave this for someone braver than I to correct.--Tex (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Maldonado
Talk:Post Office Packet Service

message: I hope that the other articles in Category:Packet (Sea Transport) can be rationalised, so that this one provdes the historical background. --Vernon White . . . Talk  23:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  As suggested, everything that was in Category:Packet (Sea Transport) is now in :Category:Packet (sea transport). --Vernon White . . . Talk  10:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article development
Talk:Salterhebble

message: Was curious about it (boring evening, wanting to see if there were any amusing incidents on it, etc) and can't find anything on the wider net save for it being referred to as an (unofficial?) address and waypoint within directions... and one tangential reference that seems to point to the 'difficulty' being because of it's narrowness and unintelligent engineering rather than the hill proper. Got any pictures, descriptions, links, etc?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.180.56 (talk) 03:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  references re: steep road hill? 

message: Still with chapel? Or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.11.224.173 (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Chapel Lane
Talk:Disappearing London

message: This edit seems to be about series 2, not series 1. I've reverted it for now, but it could be used to add some more detail to series 2 if it is correct. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 1 details 
Talk:Sir William Beauchamp-Proctor, 3rd Baronet

message: The article states that he "gained the rank of Lieutenant in 1843, and was promoted to Vice Admiral of the Red on 2 September 1850." and implies that he was a captain in 1807.
Something is wrong with the "Lieutenant in 1843" date.  I strongly doubt he was promoted from lieutenant to vice admiral in seven years, or that he became a lieutenant 36 years after being a captain.
Anklefear 23:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tabletop role-playing games in Japan

message: Poorly worded, organized, and sourced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkrocks (talk • contribs) 07:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I object to nearly all of this article

message: The lede immediately jumps into a year of release and minutae. Can anyone knowledgeable on this subject explain in the lede what makes a JRPG distinct? What its core traits are? --EEMIV (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, what is the difference? I have a feeling, the distinction arose among video games, where the styles of play are very different. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 11:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

text: An RPG made in Japan, presumably Baudshaw (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: So, what actually IS a JRPG?

message: I'm not that knowledgeable about Ultima's history but a brief check indicates that it is not a Japanese RPG, yet this is stated in the History section. Can someone clarify? 81.102.142.194 (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultima? 

message: Casually, Japanese role-playing game almost always refers to a Japanese roleplaying video game. That may not be ideal, but I think that is the most widely accepted usage. Pawsplay (talk) 05:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. This article should be retitled Tabletop role-playing games in Japan. The current title is universally used for video games, not tabletop. I'm moving it now. oknazevad (talk) 22:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm pretty sure the name of this article is terrible
Talk:2006 Pine Middle School shooting

message: This qoute "he did not want to be up close when blood came out of any of the victims." needs to be cited.  Somehow I don't think it's very pertinent either.Anthonzi 23:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the quote and cited it in my new expanded version.  Thanks. --Banime (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite this qoute 

message: This article is going to be nominated for deletion. This article does meet the notability of a crime event. {Tim C} 06:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: Because of the recent Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pine_Middle_School_shooting, we should probably have a discussion of whether it should be merged with school shootings or list of school attacks.  If you have any comments or feel one way or another, talk about it here. --Banime (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion
Talk:Anna Easter Brown

message: There isn't any need to have multiple citations for the same fact, especially since all the sources are essentially from the sorority. I would settle on the book, and then use the others only when you have to. If they were covering different material, or conflicted with each other, then there would be a reason to use more than one. It's confusing this way.--Parkwells (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Military computers

message: Regarding the previous copyright tag; I check some of the text and did not find it anywhere else. Chassisplans 23:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

message: There needs to be a reference to the following standard for protection against EMP
http://www.tscm.com/MIL-STD-464.pdf
This is because my first job as an electronics engineer in 1985 was in military avionics, and every piece of electronics had a crowbar circuit to protect against it.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlashJackFromGundagai (talk • contribs) 15:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing reference to Electromagnetic Pulse Protection

message: Still reads like a Chassis Plans subtle ad. YMMV 212.188.108.178 (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a subtle advertising page 

message: "The progress of small-scale computer technology in military applications was initially slow due to concerns about security and the ability to survive rugged environments and enemy weaponry. PC-based technology in the 20th century was not robust enough to withstand combat conditions and severe environments."
Not to mention that until the late 80's, soldiers had the option to be a grunt, a CO, or a civilian.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.83.96 (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow Adoption Rate 
Talk:Bengal Mumbai FC

message: want imformation&form of selection of under 19  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.119.39 (talk) 10:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  selection
Talk:Earl of Snowdon

message: Eh? It's a mountain in Wales then what? It would be nice to see how this title relates to geography. Kortoso  (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Snowdon? 

message: I would like to raise an issue with regard to the coronet used in the arms for the 2nd Earl of Snowdon. The coronet depicted is not that of an Earl, rather the Type 5 Princely coronet reserved for those grandchildren of the Sovereign through the female line. I am not saying that the 2nd Earl of Snowdon is not entitled to such a coronet, it's just a specific warrant must be issued by the Sovereign for such an entitlement to be in effect. Is anyone aware that such a warrant from the present Sovereign has been issued to substantiate the use of this coronet?Ds1994 (talk) 14:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the arms image was corrected by an editor on 5 April 2017, so the coronet depicted is now that of an earl. -- Blairall (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms - coronet 

message: Regarding the arms of David Armstrong-Jones, a discussion is taking place here. -- Blairall (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms - sources
Talk:Al-Khader

message: The way I understand the rule is that the article al- is lower case within a sentence, but upper case at the beginning of a sentence - and as a title as well, or not? The "move" function doesn't work, the title is already marked as Al- with capital A, but seemingly there's an overriding programming issue, with al- showing up in lower case, as if it were a common noun. Arminden (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Very mysterious.  I tried a few things unsuccessfully. This talk page shows as "Al-Khader". Zerotalk 02:19, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Al-Khader contains a  template. If you remove that, the article title will show up with upper case 'Al-' rather than 'al-'. EdJohnston (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title: Al-Khader, not al-Khader
Talk:Nashashibi family

message: I was surprised to see that one of the Nashishibi's most important contributions to society was completely ignored in the article. The family is well-known for selling thousands of acres of land to Jews in the 19th & 20th centuries. Much of this land was comprised of swamps that were later drained as well as Farmland. After 1948 Jordan & Egypt stole some of this land to illegally occupy it for 19 years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.153.140 (talk) 10:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  they sold land to Jews, but it's ignored in this article 

message: Why isn't there a single paragraph about their real estate deals in the 1800's-1900's.  The family sold land at $1000 per acre to Jewish families.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1013:B028:F81D:B216:F2B0:D625:F5CD (talk) 18:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nashashibis sold land to Jewish pioneers. 

message: It avoids mentioning that when there were disputes which had some kind of resolution during the British Mandate period, then most of the time the Nashashibis lost (starting with the appointment of a Husseini as mufti of Jerusalem). AnonMoos (talk) 21:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nashashibi-Husseini rivalry
Talk:Munib al-Masri

message: Is he the same as This guy?--T. Anthony 08:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Link is now dead --NSH001 (talk) 23:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Noticed this useful source in today's Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/king-of-the-west-bank-854336.html
--NSH001 (talk) 23:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munib al-Masri "Richest man in Palestine" 
Talk:Beit Ur al-Tahta

message: The coordinates match  Bayt Ur as-Sufla, HA 117. Zerotalk 12:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Added, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 11:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older name? 
Talk:Deir Dibwan

message: Deir Dibwan () is a Palestinian city in the Ramallah and al-Bireh Governorate in the central West Bank east of Ramallah. It is also the capital of the Eastern District with Dr. Mansour F Mansour the mayor. According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics the town had a population of approximately 5,252 inhabitants in mid-year 2006.2007 PCBS Census . Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. p.114. There were 5,016 people from Deir Dibwan living abroad. Deir Dibwan was built close to the ruins of Et-Tell.
: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 December 2020 

message: The word "Deir" means monastery and the word "dibwan" came from the name of the "divan", or Council. It has also been called Deir Dubwan, where "Dubwan" is a proper name. 50.203.67.226 (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Ein Yabrud

message: Finkelstein et al, 1997, p. 563 writes:
Yaqut (IV. 1005) described the village as divided into two waqfs, one bought by the sultan al-Mu'azzam (LeStrange 1890:550; Marmardji 1951:207). 
….but  LeStrange 1890:550 doesn’t say that, at all! (link in the article). What Marmardji 1951:207 say, I don't know, as I don't have that ref., Huldra (talk) 20:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed re LeStrange.  I can look at Marmardji in a day or two.  Zerotalk 02:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

text: The information and more is in Marmardji's book. It seems very useful; pity it is in French. A scan will fly your way soon. Zerotalk 08:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:    still waiting for it...   Huldra (talk) 23:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Visiting your mailbox about 5 minutes from now could be productive. Zerotalk 01:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finkelstein 

message: I'm missing the 'Ein Yabrud limestone where fossils from the Cretaceous have been found. --Melly42 (talk) 10:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fossil site
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Ohsunnysgod

message: It is possible that  is a further sockpuppet of Ohsunnysgod, based on this edit to Cinema of Slovakia, relating to Arvin Brdárevic. --Mathew5000 00:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiderek 

message: See .
Oli Filth(talk) 15:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Snowpod]]
Talk:Fort Morgan, Alabama

message: Hi,
Recently I removed the stub status on this article after creating paragraphs and expanding on existing ones. Is the article large enough and of high enough quality for the stub tag to be removed? If not, please re-add it. Thank you.
Redditaddict69 (talk) 08:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing stub status
Talk:Confederates in the Attic

message: Rather than just a bullet-list, there should be some discussion of the book itself, with follow-up.  What happened in the lawsuit?  Did Shelby Foote say anything of note?
Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't found out the results of the lawsuit.  Also, given how anal some are about cites, anything more than a brief sentence on each chapter would invite ref tags.--Bedford 15:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Hut 7

message: :* Eric Nave, Royal Australian Navy, translator at Melbourne   -- Denham indicates he was a senior translator in the section on Kilindini, but no mention found (yet) of him at BP/K/A and Smith indicates he was too ill to return to Singapore and stayed in Melbourne.  -- DGamey 01:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: :* Capt. Kennedy - may be Malcolm Kennedy (from Smith) -- DGamey 19:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: :* I probably have too many people in the list as it stands and should trim it.  I won't do this right away as I want to review Smith again.  Anyone who gets removed should be place above under 'Removed'
::* Keep anyone who has Wikipage, reference authors, has a significant reference
::* 'Remove' anyone who doesn't get at least a second mention in a reference should be moved to 'Removed'
::* 'Remove' anyone if they can't be tied to BP/K/A
::* Where unclear, continue to track people under 'Others', in case something is missed they can be easily brought back
:DGamey 19:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming the list

message: : Note: Bletchly Park maintains an [honour roll ]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGamey (talk • contribs) 22:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bletchly Park Honour Roll 

message: * Material taked to date is from Denham, Loewe, and Scott.  
* To do - review Smith
* Linguists probably should be changed to translators.  It seems initially that everyone went through the long language course.  Cryptanalysts received additional training.  By the Time Scott joined that had changed.  Also it may be that roles changed.
* Scott refered to a gate house interview at BP (an FO man named Yoxall no first name - it would make sense that this was Leslie Yoxall as he had moved to Hut 7 in '42 about the time Scott arrived). - updated article  -- Hadn't previously heard of this interview, not sure of purpose (to confirm identity?? subselect??) 
* Not sure of Melbourne's relation with BP at this point.  I have a recollection it was different from K & A.
DGamey 11:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Notes
Talk:Wendy Darling

message: Peter Pan was first published in 1894, before the advent of the Edwardian period. Why is Wendy an "Edwardian schoolgirl"? 24.250.140.36 00:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps because the play didn't actually debut until 1904, and the book wasn't published until 1911. :) - JasonAQuest (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fremont Unified School District

message: Korean (docs from state):
*http://www.fremont.k12.ca.us/cms/lib/CA01000848/Centricity/Domain/189/CA_DMV_handbook_korean.pdf
*http://www.fremont.k12.ca.us/cms/lib/CA01000848/Centricity/Domain/189/Poison_Preparedness_Korean.ppsx
Vietnamese (docs from state):
*http://www.fremont.k12.ca.us/cms/lib/CA01000848/Centricity/Domain/189/CA_dmv_handbook_vietnamese.pdf
*http://www.fremont.k12.ca.us/cms/lib/CA01000848/Centricity/Domain/189/Poison_Preparedness_Vietnamese.ppsx
WhisperToMe (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Documents
Talk:Lycoming T53

message: Am I the only one who thinks it would be nice to know what they run on? Toyokuni3 (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuel
Talk:Interlagos

message: tis article is wrong !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Interlagos is not a City !!!!!!!!!! Interlagos is a place inside São Paulo City !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
------
There is already an entry for Autódromo José Carlos Pace, which is even linked from within this one. Therefore, this article should concern itself mainly with the city district, not the circuit. Any information related to auto racing should be moved to the other article. MCBastos (talk) 22:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)