Talk:Park Chung Hee

message: The current intro appears to be too long at 7 long paragraphs. The info there is good; can it be condensed? Holidayruin (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I gave my shot at it, let me know what you think! LaunchOctopus (talk) 23:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I made some minor changes but I think that was good work! I moved a lot of the content that used to be in the Introduction to the "Legacy" section, which also needs work. Holidayruin (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro too long? 

message: The lead section is too long, but more importantly the encyclopaedic tone is not right. Information in the lead section about Park’s presidency, the assasisantion and its aftermath, and the later ‘democrisation’ of SK should be elsewhere 2407:7000:9F9D:5100:780A:3823:DFC5:5288 (talk) 09:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section needing rewrite 

message: The redirect Po Zhengxi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  747pilot (talk) 23:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Po Zhengxi]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks (contribs) 19:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Park Chung-hee →  – Suggesting this move under WP:COMMONNAME. "Park Chung Hee" is the most common name per Google ngram. Its also the name used by Encyclopaedia Britannica and academic sources (For example, see this search on jstor of Park Chung-hee). :3 F4U (they/it) 03:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Korea has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 April 2023 

message: I'm not certain how to rephrase it, but the first few lines of the intro need to be changed to be clearer to the reader that Park was a dictator. I'm aware it comes up later, but simply stating that he was the President without context, provides an inaccurate perspective. :3 F4U (they/it) 01:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First lines of intro 

message: At time of writing, the date format is currently DMY, but the page started off as MDY. It looks like someone changed it possibly around the mid 2010s (theres so many versions of the page and I don't really want to look for the exact one). Looks like no post was made on the talk page.
I'm going to revert it back to MDY because that's what it originally was. There's no real standard for date format for Korea-related articles, we just stick to established standard. The same applies for the Assassination of Park Chung Hee page; I will change that back too. toobigtokale (talk) 10:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date format 

message: Hi, question. Is Arikawa's given name (圭一) read as "Keiichi" or "Kazuichi"?
Chong-Sik Lee writes Kazuichi, but I'm seeing Keiichi on other websites (게이이치), and searching name dictionaries shows only Keiichi or Kiyokazu as possible readings. Lee's book has some minor transliteration/romanization mistakes that I've spotted so far, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's incorrect here. toobigtokale (talk) 08:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arikawa's name 

message: The lead photo doesn't have a date attached to it. The page on Park's assassination states that it was taken in 1973, but it is uncited. Does anyone know when this photo was taken? Dantus21 (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyright on it in general is I think sus. I've been eyeing it as something to fix in the future, but list of things to do on this article is already long. I'm easily distracted so have been working on other things since, but this is still very much on my radar. toobigtokale (talk) 22:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this portrait below from this chart on Wikimedia Commons. The chart would probably be considered a derivative work in most cases, but since it was uploaded by the Korean government themselves under a CC license (note it has a ticket too), I think it safe to use the portrait from it. I’ll go ahead and add it to the article but if you’re still worried about it feel free to revert.  Dantus21 (talk) 01:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

text: As a sidenote, my original question was concerning when the photo was taken, not its licensing status, although I'm glad you brought that up anyway, as I had no idea about it initially. Dantus21 (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please go ahead and add the pic, I may investigate more thoroughly in a few months but it's probably safe for use. Sorry I switched topics a bit; not sure when the other photo was taken, wanted to emphasize that it probably shouldn't be there anyway 😅 Fortunately this pic is in color so it's better regardless. toobigtokale (talk) 01:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating of lead photo