lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pierre Eugene du Simitiere

message: In accordance with Wikipedia policy, once copyright has been found the article should not be modified. You can restart the article at Pierre Eugene du Simitiere/temp, which I have done for you. You can add further text there. Sorry for this inconvenience, but we need to erase the copyright from the history as well as the current version. Please feel free to keep editing. DJ Clayworth 19:08, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I disambiguated patriot to patriotism, but I'm not sure if it would more properly be disambiguated to Patriot (American Revolution), since the article is so short.  If he was a British colonist who rebelled, rather than a patriotic American after the revolution, someone who knows more about him should change it. -- Anaraug 05:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Eye of Providence

message: I tweaked the beginning of the article... The Eye of Providence (or the All-Seeing Eye of God) is a symbol that depicts an eye, often enclosed in a triangle and surrounded by rays of light or glory, meant to represent divine providence and the Sun, whereby the eye of God watches over humanity. 2603:3020:BE7:A000:34F0:3D04:1A72:1E79 (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eye of Providence - God and the Sun
Talk:Primordial black hole

message: This article measures mass in both g and kg. We should pick one unit and adjust the others to match. I suggest kg, since I've never seen grams used to measure a mass greater than a few kg. (Similar to how the distance from New York to Chicago is measured in kilometers or miles, never meters or yards.) Piojo (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grams? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jvega1314 (talk) 04:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Astroparticle Physics

message: In case there's ever an "in fiction" section, I'll mention two stories by Larry Niven: "The Borderland of Sol" (1976) and "The Hole Man" (1975). —Tamfang (talk) 05:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In "Borderland", iirc, someone guessed that the Tunguska event was the passage of a black hole, traced its likely trajectory, found it and made use of it. —Tamfang (talk) 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  in fiction 

message: I'm on the fence as to whether including this would be WP:UNDUE weight: https://phys.org/news/2020-08-planet-primordial-black-hole.html I'll leave it here for a while asking for guidance. Sandizer (talk) 00:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planet 9 

message: What it says on the tin; just putting these here to remember to check in on later:
* Oncins (2022) "Constraints on PBH as dark matter from observations: a review", comes with a video
* Bernard Carr et al. (2023) "Observational Evidence for Primordial Black Holes: A Positivist Perspective"
* Su, Li, and Feng (2023) "An inflation model for massive primordial black holes to interpret the JWST observations"
* Depta et al. (2023) "Do pulsar timing arrays observe merging primordial black holes?" 
All four are pretty juicy, which is why I'm a bit reluctant to add until they pass review. Sandizer (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Carr et al. (2024) made it into Physics Reports: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157323003976 -- very ambitious with 68 pages and 451 references! It sort of calls itself a review in the first sentence of the Abstract, and I don't see how anyone could argue. Sandizer (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preprints to add after peer review
Talk:Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922)

message: I need to make a grammar error on the Belligerents page where it said 2500 armenian joind the Greek Army Windy62776 (talk) 07:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello, moderators 

message: The estimate of 264,000 Greek deaths was fictitiously estimated on paper by R. J. Rummel, who used this estimate for a wide range from 1912 to 1922, so the number 264,000 cannot be used as the result of a war that began in 1919. 176.237.245.159 (talk) 00:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  distortion of civilian casualties 

message: hello, can you guys put the turkish civilian causalties between 1918-1922?
İt is estimated that 640.000 civilians.
Source:
Justin McCarthy,Death and Exile:Ethnic Cleasing of the Ottoman Muslims.
@Aybeg 88.236.184.51 (talk) 19:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish civilian causalties
Talk:Orthocentric system

message: If four points form an orthocentric system, then each of the four points is the orthocenter of the other three. These four possible triangles will all have the same nine point circle. 
Can you provide a simple way to prove this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.49.127 (talk) 11:46, 5 March 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: sure. Fix 3 points and draw the triangle. The nine point circle will pass through the height feet (they're three out of the 9 points). Now, choose any other three, the lines are the same, so the height feet for the new triangle will be the same, thus the new ninepoint will pass throught the same 3 points (the height feet) and will be therefore the same. --  ( drini's page ☎ ) 22:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof of a common nine point circle
Talk:Ulrika Jonsson

message: Ulrika - 284,000
 Ulrikaka - 12
 Ulrikakaka - 28
 Ulrikakakaka - 39
 Ulrikakakakaka - 16
 Ulrikakakakakaka - 12
 Ulrikakakakakakaka - 9
 Ulrikakakakakakakaka - 4
 Ulrikakakakakakakakaka - 13 (!)
 Ulrikakakakakakakakakaka - 1
 Ulrikakakakakakakakakaka etc - 0
:What is this about?? — Sverdrup 14:29, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "Discussion"

message: Where is the section and information about her parents?  Why she came to England?  How she aquired British nationality.  Where she went to school (UK or Sweden), University? and on and on.  So much is missing.  It not even clear why she has a page at all being just a TV presenter. ~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaddyBasher (talk • contribs) 18:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Life, nationality, parents and much else is missing 

message: As can be seen in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kisC5f5XVkU at 6:20
I don't see how this fact is more or less "encylopedic" than excessive detail about Ulrika's personal life and relationships. 
Surely if the Horlicks feat is unencylopedic, so is the above, which should also be removed and the page should strictly detail her professional work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:87FF:9B00:88EC:28F0:B818:10B (talk) 09:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ulrika can drink a pint of Horlicks in six seconds
Talk:Fairey Barracuda

message: Why exactlly is the plane infamous for the way its wings are folded? This should be exapnded upon i should think.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 20:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC
Dificult to explain clearly, I'm afraid. Each wing was in two sections: the inboard trailing edge and flap was folded spanwise so that it lay on top of the main section of the wing, which then folded back. A picture would explain much better.TheLongTone (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The line drawing in the specifications section shows a folded Barracuda - and shows just how messy it liiks - not sure I would call it "infamous" though.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infamous folding wings 

message: Comparable aircraft: Could this also refer to Douglas Dauntless & Vultee Vengeance? Both 2-seater dive bombers of that era.Dean1954 (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparable aircraft
Talk:Greenwashing

message: Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
Add missing citation to this sentence in the article (second paragraph of the article): "Many corporate structures use greenwashing as a way to repair public perception of their brand."
Cf2022 (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done   RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  02:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Proposed Changes 

message: There was a POV tag in this section which referred to the article; I changed it to a section POV, which is presumably what was intended. No comment from me. However, guidelines discourage "drive-by" tagging and say that there should be a discussion. Go ahead ... Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Examples of greenwashing" section tagged as NPOV 

message: This article focuses largely on western developed, democratic nations (with the exception of a section on Thailand). This presents the suggestion that greenwashing either does not occur elsewhere in the world, or that it is wholly a western problem/phenomenon. PetSematary182 (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western focus: should this article have a broader scope? 

message: is omnipresent and more dangerous - but missing in Wikipedia :(
Got save the Queen / King  ;) 85.216.197.77 (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democracywashing 

message: — Assignment last updated by 1namesake1 (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WRIT 340 for Engineers - Fall 2022 - 66816

message: — Assignment last updated by Taurus428 (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIEA 140 REMOTE China since 1978
Talk:Ralph Vaughan Williams

message: If there are several books in addition to Saylor's, then why don't you add them to "Further readings" instead of getting rid of Saylor's? We editors should be assisting Wikipedia users, not worrying so much about enforcing our rules. But, as I said, I am through with this. It's not important enough to me. Maurice Magnus (talk) 17:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: we have tried to explain to this editor that Further reading sections are admirable for books that have "additional and more detailed coverage of the subject", and asked him/her to explain what new or specialist material the suggested title contains, but it seems s/he doesn't know and so far there is no reason to suppose that it needs mention any more than the other numerous books about RVW not cited in the article. We are not a library catalogue. I see the book is published by the OUP, which is always a good sign, but even so, there is no evidence that it would be helpful to the reader to single it out for a Further reading section here. Tim riley talk 19:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the OUP site which quotes one review "Eric Saylor's new biography of Vaughan Williams...is the first to take full account of research published in the last twenty years, of the hitherto unfamiliar early works of the composer published for the first time in the last 25 years, and of the online corpus of some 5000 letters written by him only recently made accessible." https://global.oup.com/academic/product/vaughan-williams-9780190918569?cc=us&lang=en&#  I would say one needs a review not on the publisher's (even if the OUP) web page. I don't currently have access to the Wall Street Journal or the Literary Review which both have reviews of the work. It does seem a substantial work.  --Erp (talk) 01:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If it contains anything new and important we should add that to the article where appropriate, and not merely relegate the book to "Further reading". I'll order the book at the British Library and see what, if anything, we ought to draw from it for our WP article. Tim riley talk 11:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading 

message: RE: "Joining the Royal Army Medical Corps as a private, he drove ambulance wagons in France and later in Greece."
Per Stephen Connock's book, The Edge of Beyond (Albion Music 2021), page 58, VW was a wagon orderly, not a driver. Drivers came from the Army Service Corp. I would change this, but I was asked to suggest changes here first. Rgrames (talk) 03:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: VW spelled the term "waggon orderly", but that was his job title, certainly. (See Ursula, p. 120) Tim riley talk 07:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  VW assignment in the Royal Army Medical Corps
Talk:Presumptive nominee

message: There is interesting banter going on over at Talk:2012_Republican_National_Convention and this article could use some Ron Paul info at the end. Ron Paul recognized Mitt Romney as the presumptive Nominee, assured of the nomination, but his supporters and some of his delegates have a different mindset.  Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 15:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2012 Republican 'presumtive' Nominee, Mitt Romney ( in current Wikipedia discussion) 

message: All the references and discussion are US-related. Intro should thus be "In US politics ..." unless the term is actually used in any other country - David Gerard (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence this term is in use outside US? 

message: This article should be deleted because it is no more than a dictionary definition. The word presumptive adds no value other than the definition. Similarly, the term "blue car" means a car that is blue, that's it. A presumptive nominee is just a nominee that is presumed.
Dharahara (talk) 21:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be deleted 

message: There is too much original research in this article. This is illegal according to Wikipedia rules that I just read.
Ronald Reagan was never a presumptive nominee according to reliable sources, only according to Wikipedia people who made it up years or decades after the fact. No source from 1984 says so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dharahara (talk • contribs) 23:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research is prohibited 

message: FreeRangeFrog recommended discussion about merging it with candidate. That would keep the idea but not have a dictionary definition article. Dharahara (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  candidate article
Talk:CI protein

message: what the heck is this page?  I have no idea what topic this page is on.  moink 21:42, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what´s the subject (stupid homework) but i was gonna suggest merge this one into the whole Lambda phage article, there is no need for a article for the protein who repress the system--ometzit<col> 23:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harri Porten

message: Not famous.  moink 21:06, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I might bring it up for deletion sometime soon.  It doesn't seem to have been improved at all since the last deletion nomination.  So, if you're keen on keeping Harri around, start talking about him!Ravenmasterq 23:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For anyone watching this page...

message: He wrote KJS, a JavaScript interpreter, as free software, which was then used by a very large company (Apple) and has been forked several times since then (Google). Almost every web browser today is using some descendant of KJS and KHTML. Kind of crazy when you think about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.144.209.8 (talk) 23:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why important 
Talk:Bobos in Paradise

message: I toed the line of POV, and hope I didn't cross it. If anyone can phrase the content I've added in a more neutral manner, I won't object. Mike Church 21:52, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This book is basically a giant conservative-friendly, bad faith ad hominem argument by a genocide sympathizer that tries to pigeonhole young middle class folks looking for legitimate alternative in a world of rampant consumerism. There are many great historical books not featured on Wikipedia. Why this cheap article for this cheap book? 2600:1700:8FD0:E30:DD13:8E26:D2FA:37E3 (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

message: I'd appreciate help with writing a much expanded version of this.  See Cdamama/bobo.  Thanks, CDaMama 19:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: afaik is "bobo" simply the term used in french and german speaking countries for hipster. the word bobo is more common there than the word hipster. -- 46.220.102.113 (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  bobo
Talk:Pancreas

message: Why ever does this article refer to "Type One diabetes" (a widely used term), but then go on to refer to "secondary diabetes" (which is not a widely used term at all)? Surely the term which should have been used here was the more commonly used term of "Type Two diabetes"? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More common names for diabetes

message: There is no reason for this article to be separate; the short size and nature of the Pancreas article bears witness to this; this article would be of better quality and more utility to readers if it was provided with the context that the pancreas article bestows LT910001 (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed this merge. --LT910001 (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Exocrine component of pancreas]] 

message: There is no way the pancreas is "5.75–9.5 cm long"! The German Wikipedia says 16-20 cm and I think this is more realistic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.202.184.53 (talk) 12:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out, IP editor. I'd encourage you to create an account and contribute further to the encyclopedia! --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomy: size error! 

message: I downloaded the ebook, same edition (19th),  the reference points to pages  pp. 2437–8, but those pages are about lipoproteins and the liver.
So if I try to fix this reference, the pancreas is mentioned in "Part 14: Disorders of the gastrointestinal System", "Section 3: Disorders of the Pancreas", those are pages 2086−2102.
I don't think I'm wrong in this, so I will fix the reference, but if I am, feel free to let me know and explain. Thanks :) —Arthurfragoso (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harrison's book, wrong page reference
Talk:John Sweeney (labor leader)

message: I'd argue for a High-Level importance rating. Sweeney is the current leader of the largest labor movement in the United States. If he dies or retires, I'd argue it would be Mid-Level. But he's one of two primary voices for organized labor in the U.S. I think that ranks as High-Level. Tim1965 03:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: LabourProject Importance
Talk:Square triangular number

message: Mathematica seems to prefer the term "square triangular number" to "triangular square number". Maybe tri.sq. should be a redirect to sq.tri., but I don't want to move articles unless I'm absolutly sure its the right thing to do. Numerao 22:14, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: So do I, but Google makes it pretty even  and  at about 50 hits each.  --Henrygb 14:11, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Actually most TSNs seem to come from wikipedia copies, so moved --Henrygb 15:03, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

text: square beats triangular: e.g. in the range ]1...1000] there are 43 triangulars but only 30 squares. So the right name must be square triangular number.46.115.1.200 (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Square triangular number

message: I added a new section to Pell numbers. I might suggest redirecting this page to that section. Comments? --Gentlemath (talk) 00:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is in great need of improvement, but it is on a different topic than Pell numbers (although they are obviously closely related) and should I think remain a separate article. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pell Numbers

message: What's about an enlargement into another dimensions, e.g. "Cube tetrahedral number" (can't find any in the range <1,000,000,000) 46.115.1.200 (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is known  that the only binomial coefficient \binom{n}{k} with k\ge 3 (and n\ge 2k) that is also a power of an integer is the case \binom{50}{3}=140^2; apparently this is a result of Erdös. Since tetrahedral numbers are binomial coefficients, this means that no tetrahedral number other than one is a perfect cube, and only 1, 4, and 19600 are perfect squares. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  higher dimensions
Talk:Unionism in Ireland

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Unionism in Northern Ireland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Unionism in Northern Ireland until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Heanor (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unionism in Northern Ireland" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Unionism (Northern Ireland) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Unionism (Northern Ireland) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Heanor (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unionism (Northern Ireland)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I propose to split this article into separate pages called Ulster unionism and Irish unionism. Ulster unionism (effectivly unionism in the post-1922 Northern Ireland, it also existed before the partition of the country as the form of Unionism specific to the province of Ulster) is distinct enough to merit a separate article from unionism throughout Ireland, especially in Dublin. Ibuman (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's long, but given it is split up into subject-headed sections is that really a problem?~~~ ManfredHugh (talk) 15:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:TOOBIG - if  size > 100 kB . Ibuman (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

text: WP:TOOBIG is a guideline. Splitting the article would essentially remove most of the "Irish Unionism 1800–1904" section, removing context for the rest of the article. There's nothing of much substance that could then be added to the split-off 'Irish unionism' article, post 1922. Leave as is. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 18:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal 

message: What are people's views on having a section for unionism or loyalism in the Republic of Ireland? There's obviously not a whole lot there, certainly not nearly enough for its own page, but probably sufficient for a short section? Ceaceacea (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unionism in the Republic of Ireland