Talk:Pokémon: Lucario and the Mystery of Mew

message: This article's plot section is in desperate need of a review. It has poor formatting, spelling errors and general poor quality of work in trying to explain the movie's plot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.238.124.151 (talk) 20:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. I'll get around to it eventually; hopefully soon. Oh, and remember to sign your talk page posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Cheers. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 01:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

text: WP:SPOILER. Melicans (talk, contributions) 04:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He isn't saying it is a spoiler. He is saying that it goes way too much into detail, which is not what plot sections should do. Blake (Talk·Edits) 15:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I was originally going to comment on some information (which I couldn't even find on Movie Tome) in the first paragraph, but thankfully an anonymous user with the IP adress 65.103.2.224 deleted it, and hopefully it'll stay deleted.
The same Movie Tome page mentioned above does not mention any rating except for a single "Y7 FV(PG)", so the ratings that User:Ryanasaurus0077 posted had to come from somewhere else. And since Movie Tome relies on user contributions, I even have doubts about the accuracy of that Y7/PG rating.
In fact, isn't a Japanese PG-12 rating (or for that matter, Canadian 14A or British 12A rating) an equivalent to an American PG-13 rating? That would suggest that this movie has about the same level of violence as, for example, the most recent Star Wars or Harry Potter movie, which it clearly doesn't. It IS targeted mainly to young children, after all...
Another question: why would the Japanese version need ratings in America, the UK, Canada, Australia, etc., when it's only available in Japan? Same goes for the dub getting a rating in  Japan, as dub versions were only available there as extras for the first three movie DVDs.
In short, due to a lack on concrete evidence of these ratings, and the fact that this movie is entirely too tame for the equivalent of a PG-13 rating, I have removed them from the article. Wonk619 05:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Ratings

message: I do not believe I need to comment, but we've got numerous anonymous IPs coming in and making all the relevant edits to above? --Anthony Jake La (Tetsuya-san; talk : contribs) 05:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True, I personally suspect that those IPs are actually Ryanasaurus' sock puppets. Wonk619 16:02, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: None of which I go under as of now. --Ryanasaurus0077 18:28, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Ratings, revisited

message: To the editor(s) continuously adding the "sequel" category, please cease such action. It is requested that you stop this as Pokémon movies are considerably NOT sequels. --Anthony Jake La (Tetsuya-san; talk : contribs) 13:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel category

message: Technically, this would be the ninth Pokemon movie instead of the eighth as reported, as there are already 8 current movies under the name of Pokemon, being The First Movie, Pokemon 2000, Pokemon 3, Mewtwo Returns, Pokemon 4ever, Pokemon Heroes, Jirachi Wish Maker and Destiny Deoxys.
: Mewtwo Returns is, among others, considered a Pokémon special, made for television. See for more info Pokémon movies and Pokémon specials/OAVS. -- Face 11:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of movies

message: I was excited to see about the Mew download event at Toys-R-Us on September 30, 2006 and immediately went to the company's site to ask where in my area that I could take my son to have Mew downloaded.  Here is their response:
Thank you for contacting the "R" Us Family.  I apologize, but we do not have
information on the announcement you are asking about.  Please contact the
webpage in question for details.  If there is anything else we can assist you
with, please call 1-800-toysrus or email again.
Sincerely, 
Toys "R" Us Guest Relations Team
And this is with sending them a link to the original article.  If someone could please let me know if/when there will be a Mew download 'event', I would appreciate it.  If there is no event, please remove the misleading information from the article.
Thank youAlpha48185 15:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toys-R-Us event 

message: Greetings Trainers,
I apologize.  Today I received an email from Nintendo which also mentioned the Mew download.  I will now need to access the Nintendo site for further details.  
Sorry for offending anyone.
Alpha48185 15:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toys-R-Us event - an apology 

message: In the trivia section, it says the following:
"This is the only movie so far to have scenes from the anime (Pikachu saving Ash from the flock of Spearow in episode one)."
I believe that this is incorrect, and that there's a similar flashback in the introduction to the fifth Pokemon movie, Pokemon Heroes. I'm deleting that comment from the trivia section, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
- May 2nd, 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.59.57 (talk • contribs) 
:No, you're right about that. In the first movie, they showed a scene from The Battle of the Badge with Gary battling Giovanni with his Nidoking and Arcanine. --PAK Man + 04:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think in that case it's just the same scene but with new, different footage.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 05:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia mistake 

message: who redirected the Arron (Pokemon) article and why?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir aaron sama girl (talk • contribs) 
:Sign your posts. Because a such a one-shot character is ultimately and utterly nonnotable.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 03:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's a Pokémon-centric encyclopedia. -Sukecchi 14:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I edited May's quote, as she said "Hey, Pikachu!", not "Hey you, Pikachu!". I believe now that is correct it doesn't belong in the article because it isn't very noteworthy. But I'm not sure, so feel free to delete it if you think it shouldn't be here. Deoxys911 20:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already removed it...the entire trivia section should be removed anyway, as it's a good idea to avoid trivia sections. -Sukecchi 20:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Someone recently edited this page, taking out the part about Lucario's death being subject to debate, and added a ton of grammar and spelling errors. I reverted as much back as I could with my limited wikipedia knowledge, but it still needs fixing; if you think it's bad now, you should have seen how sloppy the last person made it... There is debate on if Lucario and Aaron are dead, or simply were teleported. Their bodies were not shown (as Aaron's was originally), but instead disappeared in blue spheres similar to Mew's teleport attack in the first movie. It's very odd that Lucario did not simply freeze as Aaron did when he first used his aura to save the tree, and odder still that Aaron and Lucario are seen eating chocolate on Earth, in the exact same spot they met. It couldn't have been a flashback, as Lucario had not eaten chocolate until Max gave it to him in the movie.
If this is too long of a rant for you, just, please, realize that you shouldn't edit something into Wikipedia unless you know it's 100% fact. If you insist on doing so, at least try to make your wording a lot less awkward. Wikipedia is not AIM.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.248.165.242 (talk) 18:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: FUNimation didn't dub this it was the last film 4Kids Entertainment did I'm changing it back !!!!!!! Matthew Cantrell (talk) 20:59, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  VANDALISM