Talk:FC Progresul București

message: :Image:National Bucuresti.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:National Bucuresti.png

message: A user has requested that the article FC Steaua Bucureşti be moved to FC Steaua Bucharest. The outcome of that discussion may affect the naming of this article. If you wish to join the discussion, you can do so at Talk:FC Steaua Bucureşti#Requested move. AecisBrievenbus 12:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FC Steaua Bucureşti move request 

message: It's probably a good idea for the article to have some more sources show that it has received the significant coverage it needs for a stand-alone Wikipedia article. Right now, there are no and inline citations and only two primary sources provided as external links. Primary sources, such as official pages, etc., cannot be used to show notability per :WP:ORG, so something independent is needed. Anything which satisfies :WP:RS, such a newspaper articles, books, magazines, websites, etc. would help, but it cannot be trivial mentions such as the examples given in :WP:ORGDEPTH.  Personally, I think the club probably satisfies :WP:FOOTYN#Club notability, but try and remember that that is a only WikiProject guideline and WikiProject guidelines do not supercede community wide guidelines per :WP:CONLEVEL, so there's no guarantee that someone someday will not nominate the article for deletion via :WP:AfD if the article's sourcing remains as is. 
FWIW, I tried Googling for sources and was able to find , but all of the articles are in Romanian which I am unable to read them. I tried searching "FC Progresul București" on the website of :Gazeta Sporturilor and some of the other papers listed in :List of newspapers in Romania, but again all the articles are in Romanian. Non-English sources are perfectly acceptable per :WP:NOENG as long as they are reliable sources, so if any sources which can be used to established the club's notability and support the article text should be added. It might be a good idea to use the  parameter as explained in :Template:Cite web#Quote for non-English sources are used to make verification easier. Finally, I took a look at the the Romanian Wikipedia article :ro:AFC Progresul Bucureşti# Bibliografie and there seems to be a book Fotbal în Parcul cu Platani written by Valentin Căltuţ which might be useful, but not sure. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing