lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Collateral source rule

message: I'm removing the "global perspective" tag, because this rule, due to its common law nature is only relevant to legal systems descended from the English common law: England and her colonies.  Thus a non-English perspective is just down right pointless. Caelarch (talk) 06:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, are you sure that this is a common law principle that also applies in former British colonies? I ask because, although IANAL, I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply in Australia. In fact to the contrary, where the plaintiff is eligible for statutory compensation, that sum must be considered in claims for damages. I don't know if that's a recent change but I believe it to be have been the case for at least ten years if not much longer. -- 202.63.39.58 (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, according to our own Tort reform article, the collateral source rule is US case law dating only to 1854. This article also describes it as one of "the oddities of American accident law." This still doesn't mean the  tag is required, but I've removed the claims that it's Common Law. -- 202.63.39.58 (talk) 12:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article reads like an argument for the collateral source rule.  The last paragraph starts with "however," as if to rebut the previous paragraph.  I don't know enough about the rule to edit it myself, but as it stands it certainly doesn't read as objective. Nickmleonardi (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-objective
Talk:2009 Sundance Film Festival

message: I might be jumping the gun a little bit on this one what with the dust just settling from this year's festival; but I was checking the Press section of their website and noticed that they had announced dates for their 2009 festival. I figured that this was as good of a reason as any to start up the article. In case the content of the page changes, the relevant sentence is "The 2009 Sundance Film Festival will be held January 15 through January 25 in Park City, Salt Lake City, Ogden and Sundance, Utah." as it appeared on this page on this date. —A 07:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:27th Sundance Film Festival which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 01:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Salmon River (Washington)

message: The waterflow report for the Samon River, Olympic National Forest, Washington State, is not located on the USGS website.  Can anyone tell me where I might find it ppkeà⅘ 2601:601:C800:8090:812B:8F37:9820:92DB (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salmon River Waterflow Reports
Talk:Magic (software)

message: The link is not reachable on Feb.07.2008.
 http://research.compaq.com/wrl/projects/magic/magic.html
If that is a constant fact, please remove it. 
regards
eb
: Ok, I replaced with a page that I maintain that includes a set of links. Cxbrx (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deadlink

message: The interesting bit of the license reads "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted [...]". Now, this leaves me with 2 questions
*Is distribution of modified versions allowed?
*Is commercial distribution allowed?
Palosirkka (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licensing
Talk:Aira Yūki

message: Is there a reason that her name is romanized as Yuhki instead of the much more common Yuuki?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edasaki (talk • contribs) 01:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like that was an older romanized version of her name. Lantis doesn't use it, so I changed it back to the standard Yūki.--十八 04:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Template talk:National Rugby League top try scorers

message: I am fairly certain that this list is 100% complete and does not miss any person who equalled the top of the try-scoring list for a certain year. There could be a case where I did not remember to read the person listed second in the table found at the following link  - http://203.166.101.37/NRL07/index.html (then go to competition-->stats leaders). But I can't be absolutely certain because unlike the points scoring list, I did not go over this twice to check. By default I put the person at the top of the table in the navbox and also anybody listed afterwards with the same amount of tries when I saw this was the case. If someone has the time and could verify that this list is in fact finished, then that would be great. Just leave a note here to notify the rest of us that you have done so. Cheers, mdmanser (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Super League's top try scorer was left out.--Jeff79 (talk) 10:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: NRL's supplier of statistics, www.nrlstats.com (then click the "detailed statistics" link at the bottom), combines the two 1997 competitions and lists them under one "season". I had a think about providing separate player names for both competitions but decided to stick with what Sportsdata shows, given they are the statistics source for all media outlets and the NRL. What do you reckon? mdmanser (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like it. It's inconsistent with what's been done here on wikipedia. Nowhere else on wikipedia has data been incorporated into one 1997 season. There are two separate articles with two separate top try/point-scorers. I struggle to see the logic in counting them as one season. I don't think anyone else does. Different teams playing a different number of games. There's no parity. I don't think we'd be being silly or rebelling too much by going our own way on this and having two for 1997.--Jeff79 (talk) 03:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I think we should. The NRL Stats website shows it that way. MDM (talk) 10:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification

message: The external links in the 2010 section (above) are now (unsurprisingly) dead, so I'm trying to recover them using 'web.archive.org/web' and 'archive.is', but apparently to no avail DynamoDegsy (talk) 09:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead links
Talk:List of political parties in Slovakia

message: Hi, Strana Ochrany Prav Romov is a stub, and probably belongs on this page somewhere, but I have no idea where. Cheers, Mostlyharmless (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strana Ochrany Prav Romov

message: On the mobile version of the article, Direction is missing in the list. Does anyone have any idea why?Ondrusj (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malfunction of the mobile version 
Talk:Nelson W. Winbush

message: The new location for the Elizabeth Wright article is now at http://shnv.blogspot.com/2007/10/beating-up-on-confederacy.html. GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Elizabeth Wright article
File talk:Awn logo.png

message: The license on this image, according to the original SVG, was CC BY-SA (2.0).  Recently (2008-02-01), the author agreed to relicense the image to CC BY-SA (3.0 Unported).  See bzr revision 166 of Awn's trunk branch for details.  Therefore, the license of this image should change to one of those licenses. malept (talk) 08:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Andrew Spencer

message: DGG politely points out that my description of Ulrich's is wrong (applying less to Ulrich's than to OCLC WorldCat). My bad. However, for academic journals published in the major anglophone nations in the second half of the twentieth century, in practice Ulrich's is about as good as a Union Catalogue: were an "American Journal of Philosophy" to exist, it would be listed in Ulrich's; it isn't listed. -- Hoary (talk) 08:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ulrich's
Talk:Holographic display

message: There is no independent page for "holographic display" currently. Instead I have added a redirect to CGH. I know this is a pain in the ass, but CGH and holographic display technology are very closely interwoven subjects and as long as there is so little independent content on the technology, I do not like the idea of distributing it piecemeal over several articles.
Should this be a disambiguation page?
DarkArcher25 (talk) 17:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2010 comment 

message: Now that some references have been added, it would be useful if an explanation could be given as to what "electroholography" actually is.  If it is the same as Computer-generated holography then there is an existing article on this topic.  If there is anything new, it should be included in this.  If not, then a new article entitled Electroholography might be appropriate.
I would suggest that a "Holographic Display" page is not required -  the Holography article already discusses display holograms. Epzcaw (talk) 20:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electro-holography 

message: I found some of the info below on the Lenticular printing page and adapted it, since it seems to be about a holographic display rather than a lenticular one. Because I don't understand the holographic display technique very well, I could not figure out where it should go on this page (or possibly on a different page if it turns out to be a different technique after all).
The Looking Glass is a holographic display that shows 45 different angles. It was introduced with a very successful 2018 Kickstarter campaign, mainly aimed at 3D creators.
Joortje1 (talk) 06:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The Looking Glass

message: Isn't this just talking about volumetric displays? I assumed this was talking about displays that used holography, but it lists a bunch that clearly don't, like laser plasma. — DanielLC 04:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volumetric display 

message: The 3DS has a holographic screen.  It could be mentioned in a short list of the most common 3 Dimensional displays on the market that work without special glasses.  I think it's relevant since over 75 million 3DS have sold, making it the best sold Holographic display to date.
2600:1700:8830:8DF0:188E:1EF4:DC28:5C6D (talk) 04:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 3DS screen
Talk:Bischofshofen

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Government of Indianapolis

message: ^^^I wasn't sure whether to make it high or top, so I went with the low side. :) --L. Pistachio (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Citizens energy is "regulated as a municipal utility" according to the 3/9/2010 MOU between the City/Mayor Ballard and the "Department of Public Utilities of the City of Indianapolis, as Trustee of a Public Charitable Trust, D/B/A Citizens Energy Group" when Ballard transferred water & wastewater utilities to them. "Regulated as" - I need to ask the IURC if it is one. GXIndiana (talk) 03:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Citizens had to file its gas rates with the IURC for approval long before it took over the water and wastewater systems. I believe that in most cases in Indiana, a municipally-owned utility does not have to file with the IURC, the theory being that the city or town council has to approve the rates and therefore are answerable to the users of the utility via the voting booth. Citizens' board of directors appoints its successors when a vacancy occurs on the board, without any input from the public or the city administration because it is a public charitable trust. Therefore, the IURC approval is required as a check and balance. Indyguy (talk) 03:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizens Energy
Talk:SP&S Class A2

message: Well, that's sort of what I want to see for the SP&S Locomotive class pages.  A basic history of the locomotive, and a breakdown of previous/later numbers.  However, my sources disagreed on this particular unit.  If another Wikipedian has a suggestion/better way to handle the differences, let me know (or just correct me)
LarryLeach (talk) 09:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article outline
Talk:List of airlines of the Philippines

message: I think the airlines with logos available should be placed on the list of airlines. Itsquietuptown (Just talk to me here) 10:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Logo be placed on the chart 

message: This is the proposal to change the wikipedia page to List of Airlines in the Philippines and the following sections: Scheduled, Charter, Cargo, and See More as of all other list of Airlines (in other pages). Hope y'all agree. Corner2002 (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 
Talk:Dodge Diplomat

message: Per edit log.... "Dragkiller", the Diplomat is certainly not a Pony Car, please stop adding that link to the Diplomat's class.  From the Pony Car page's first paragraph, this is obvious.  It was not "launched and inspired by the (1964) Ford Mustang", the Diplomat was based on the Dodge Aspen (from 1977) which was based on the Plymouth Valiant (from 1960, before the Mustang).  It was certainly not a "highly styled car", nor did it have a "sporty or performance-oriented image".  Thanks. Fjbfour (talk) 19:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pony Car
Talk:Elan Valley

message: Removed the comment that the valley is famous for "its use as an SAS training area". No way that one can stand up without a citation. Leushenko (talk) 02:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAS 

message: Anyone fancy plotting the route of the Elan Aqueduct as a series of PoIs? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 15:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elan Aqueduct route 

message: Shouldn’t we promote the traditional Welsh name of Cwm Elan as the title name with Elan Valley listed as an alternative?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DuskyDunes (talk • contribs) 17:34, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not WP's role as an encyclopaedia to 'promote' but rather to describe, based on references.  I see that Cwm Elan is noted as the Welsh name for the valley but 'Elan Valley' is overwhelmingly used in English to describe the area and WP 'common name' guidance applies. As an aside, EV is probably used a great deal to refer not just to Cwm Elan but also to encompass the Claerwen valley too, the Claerwen being a tributary which is also dammed and the resultant reservoir loosely lumped in with the Elan Valley Reservoirs. cheers Geopersona (talk) 12:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Nant-y-Ffrith

message: The article intro focus is unclear as it refers both to a river and woods. What is the primary focus of this article, it should be one "thing or concept" for clarity and if another thing or concept shared the name it would help in scoping of content if made a separate article for classification, search and expansion. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  focus of the article
Talk:Rossendale Valley

message: This page really needs sources. Nothing is backed up in this article. Tong22 (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, could someone find a source to verify that Ramsbottom forms part of the Rossendale Valley? Rosssendale's tourist website and Bury MBC's information page on the town make no mention of the valley. Tong22 (talk) 19:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of sources

message: A merger has been proposed, of the stub Rossendale Forest (actually a hilly, open area of moors), to this article. It should probably be a section there with some more info on this area.  The discussion was opened on the merge-from page by accident, but I don't think anyone will care.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  17:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Rossendale Forest]]

message: there seems to be some confusion here. Are you aware that in attempting to restore a not particularly relevant See also yesterday, you deleted about half the article including over 60% of the references? Today, while apparently trying to remove the Trivia section (judging from subsequent edits), you again deleted the same content as yesterday. Apologies for the snarky edit summary, it seemed that you felt that half of the article was trivial. FWIW I don't actually have a problem with removing the Trivia section.Trappedinburnley (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  January reverts 

message: I changed this to a dab as was intended at the move discussion MB 19:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  dab conversion
Talk:Western Australian National Party

message: This is not a suggestion for any change, rather I'm just pointing out the link in the info box - Agrarianism - which is defined as: "a social and political philosophy which stresses the viewpoint that the cultivation of plants, or farming leads to a fuller and happier life". Nothing wrong with this of course, and I make no comment on the ideology itself (which probably holds true for many millions of people) and I know next to nothing about political philosophy so can't comment on whether this is a fair explanation of agrarianism.  Just seemed quaint and even amusing - especially in the context of 21st century in WA where an 'agrarian' party looks like holding the balance of power.GlenDillon 10:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. :) Yeah they are an agrarian party, but it's furthering agricultural interests rather than trying to sell the joys of agricultural life that they advocate. May have to look for a better choice :) Orderinchaos 10:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there's probably no need to get rid of "agrarianism". Seems appropriate for the Nationals - plenty of decent sources that describe them as an agrarian party. The issue, if there is one, lies with the definition in the Agrarianism article. Noticed that the federal Nats article has both Conservatism and Agrarianism. Maybe that's the way to go here? Also - Fed Nats article shows 'Centre-Right' for political position, which I would have thought was appropriate. When I see the term 'Centre', I think of modern UK Labour but that's just me. I don't know enough about the subject to say which of WA Nats/Fed Nats has the more accurate info box, and its an issue of very low importance anyway. Just pointing out the difference.GlenDillon 10:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the word is OK but the definition in the WP article may need some work.   There's another term I've seen 'Agrarian capitalism' which might also be a better fit.  Moondyne 10:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think you're both right, on reflection. Re conservatism - the WA Nats are generally speaking not conservative unlike their Federal counterparts, so that makes that one a bit difficult. The WA Nats have some stances (eg supportive of gay rights and equality of women) which would be abhorrent to some of the east coast branches, but which they've settled on with very little controversy. Orderinchaos 11:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agrarianism
Talk:Borrowdale

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Eskdale, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article as citations because the information has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take several years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Garsdale

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: - removal of historical county stuff, no problem with, but why remove the WP:SHORTDESC, dmy, and adding bad parameters into the sources (coauthors). Could you revisit this, please?  I don't want to blanket reverse as the historical county bit is not contentious. Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad. I was tidying up after an  editor who'd made multiple historical county changes, and messed this one up. Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ta, but you don't have revert all of it. The original intent was fine. The joy of all things (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 27 March 2021 edit
Talk:Longsleddale

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: The IPA spelling should be used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2hpkszcbjg (talk • contribs) 11:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The "s" might be voiced or not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2hpkszcbjg (talk • contribs) 11:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 
Talk:Mardale

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Wasdale

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link