Talk:Women of the Ku Klux Klan

message: Added section on criticism of Blees research methodology and removed unrelated paragraph citing study by Patai which bears no relevance and does not mention WKKK
Gamete 14:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Disputed 

message: Again I must protest at inclusion of Patai link - there is no ref to WKKK in Patais work. Again loneranger4justice assumes Im a) female and b) have a feminist agenda. Both wrong. (see feminazi discussion page) As Ive said before he appears to be using Wikipedia as his personal mens rights agenda using techniques such as bold formatting on mens rights issues and moving mens rights links and references to the front on domestic violence (please see my notes on this on the domestic violence discussion page) and other pages (see any of his previous contributions) His inability to distinguish any opposing view as a genuinely neutral view, rather than a "feminist" one is a severe failing and prejudicial on his part. As Ive said on other discussions Ive no axe to grind with him but would rather see neutrality restored where its obviously been eroded.
Gamete 13:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patai Link  

message: From the first para:
:Their work was largely promulgated through networks in the Protestant Church, the Y.W.C.A., and a variety of "vice squad organizations".
There is no organization called the "Protestant Church" in the U.S.; there are rather many separate Protestant denominations. What exactly is meant here? Is there some specific church group that's being erroneously named? Or is it meant to say that the WKKK found support in various Protestant churches? --FOo 06:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protestant Church? 

message: Wikipedia should immediately remove the content of this page and replace it with something closer to an actual history of the WKKK for interested researchers. the content is a dangerous mix of bias and inaccuracy regarding the movement itself and Blee's book. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.206.33.29 (talk) 01:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page in need of complete revision 

message: I have removed several sections from this article, since they seemed to relate to the larger topic of gender relations and the Klan.  This article is about the WKKK as an organization, not about gender relations, how the Klan viewed gender, or the larger scope of gender politics; only things that relate very directly to the actual WKKK organization should be included.  I do not think that there is enough on this to cover an article.  Is Bree's book even specifically about the WKKK, or about the larger relationship between the Klan and gender issues?  The one quote that was included did not mention the WKKK at all (and hence, I have removed it.) Given the scarcity of useful information worth putting here, and the apparent lack of reliable secondary sources, I recommend redirecting to KKK auxiliaries.  --Aquillion 08:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: A lot of the information in this article was taken from unverifiable and biased sources.  I'm removing dubious claims which have been unreferenced for quite some time, and am also adding more accurate membership figures, verifiable references and removing text which was copied directly from another website in violation of copyright.  Moving book cover image to Kathleen M. Blee where it is more appropriate and to prevent undue weight from being given to her prespectives.  These edits should take care of the neutrality and original research concerns.  Regards, AlphaEta 22:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More cleanup 

message: out of date  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.24.156.175 (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ewomen 

message: I am looking to input information under the Second Wave section as well as Recruitment, and Conflicts Among Klan Members following the current citation format. Allisonchef (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Allisonchef Hope it worked out for you!  If you still need help ask at my talk page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional information

message: this says 1 million, but does not seem as reliable a source as the cite for 500,000.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Membership

message: — Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-02

message: — Assignment last updated by Catalina0222 (talk) 23:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01