lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rathkeale

message: This article contains excessive and ridiculous links that merely serve to confuse the reader. Links should be made only to Wikipedia pages that are of particular relevance to Rathkeale.
Agreed, but this particular reader doesn't have much computer accumen so I can't figure out how to edit the superfluous links.  Anyone else?
I removed some of the links, wouldn't mind totally removing the bit on 'the park in Croagh' as the link links to no information on the park and dont really see what it has to do with Rathkeale.
The park in Croagh has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Rathkeale, I lived in Croagh and went to school in Rathkeale. I also feel that the section entitled "Welcoming" section is debatable and highly questionable. Not that I'm, questioning whether or not it is a friendly town, but I really do not think that "Rathkeale people are noted for their kind and friendly personalities and their sense of welcoming to the many visitors to the town" is necessary because unless this is a destinguishable feature unique to Rathkeale (which it isn't), I really have to strongly  question the inclusion of the Welcoming section. Its biased, and not factual enough that it should be placed in an encyclopedia summary of the town. So to be honest I feel it is best to remove it (which I will), 140.203.12.241 15:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really must object to the vandalising of this site by what appears to be Limerick County Council officials.  Much information posted here has been by members of the Rathkeale & District Historical Society and accurately reflects the history of the community.  It should be restored as a matter of urgency.  Whoever has added the note about the Church being built in 1831 might wish to identify which Church? This information is plainly incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.76.47.217 (talk) 14:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing unreferenced content is not vandalism. I'm sure the deleted content could be returned, minus its speculation and commentary parts, if sources were found for it. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Old posts
Talk:Digital Revolution/Archive 1

message: "For those living in the present" ?
That seems a little awkward.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.164.81.214 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Living in the present

message: I removed the "in the present" line from the "Concerns" section and threw together a somewhat meatier first paragraph to that section. I'll look at it again later to see if this section can be improved/expanded when I have more time.
Beingzoe 21:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised "Concerns" per suggestion 

message: Why the heck does Digital Revolution redirect to the 1990s and Digital revolution redirect to the 1950s??? 24.111.234.4 (talk) 04:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uhh
Wikipedia talk:Don't panic

message: Chairboy, I added a section.  I hope you won't mind since this is under your user page.  I'm unsure of the etiquette in this situation. --TreyHarris 08:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, great addition! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 08:25, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I second cesarb's opinion. Thryduulf 13:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I third it. Babajobu 16:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Good point, I agree.  Thanks! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Good guideline, with a good edit by Deco.  TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Excellent.  We needed a page like this.  Now I'm just wondering if there's any way to sneak in a nonintrusive reference to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy...  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree this is a good guideline, although describing it as humor or essay might also be useful.  In any case, I think we are probably fine with removing the proposed tag at this point... (And I see that the subtle reference to HHG has been added...) JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

message: You can't tell me, "Don't panic" if I don't have a towel!  User:Zoe|(talk) 17:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: whew, thanks!  User:Zoe|(talk) 19:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I already have a sonic towel, so this guideline applies to me too. Kim Bruning 09:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a patent for this method of moisture removal from the skin using sonic waves, Miss Bruning? Lemon Demon (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's my towel?

message: I really thought this page, or something very like it, already existed prior to the pedo-debacle. I'd been searching all morning for that project-space page (you'd be amazed how useless the search keys "dire", "emergency", and "action" are), and finally came across this sheerly by chance. Well done! -- nae'blis (talk) 23:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Already existed 

message: Is the shortcut WP:DON'T really necessary? I wouldn't say that it accurately tells you about the page (it is easy to guess that it is 'what not to do'), and WP:PANIC describes it much better. But it doesn't do any harm. Daniel (☎) 21:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:DON'T? 

message: Is it a policy, guideline, essay, etc? --24.20.69.240 09:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this page?
Talk:Bobby Carpenter (ice hockey)

message: I corrected two errors in the first paragraph. Carpenter was not the first American high-school player chosen in the NHL draft. That distinction belongs to Jay North who was drafted out of Bloomington Jefferson H.S. in Minnesota in the third round of the 1980 draft by the Buffalo Sabres. In fact, there were seven American high-school players chosen in the 1980 draft; five from Minnesota and two from Massachusetts, although none of those players would ever play in the NHL. However, it should be noted that the NHL was not permitted to draft high-school players until 1979. 
Carpenter was the first American high-school player drafted in the first round, as well as the first American player to go directly from high school to the NHL (i.e., with no time playing for a junior, college, or minor-league team in between).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelogan (talk • contribs) 18:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected Errors
Talk:Ram Naik

message: I found more info on this guy here -> http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/08/06/stories/2002080604300100.htm --24.131.32.78 08:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jerry Tuite

message: as far as changing his outlook...
i don't know exactly what it was, but i do know that he had a drug problem. before starting up a professional wrestling career, he worked at Monmouth park horse track with my dad in the stable area. he was a close family friend. again, i can't exactly say what and i didn't put that in, so i can't confirm anything, but i do believe he had a drug problem that he overcame.--141.153.131.207 03:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The paragraph about his death states that "his history of drug use is thought to have been a contributing factor in his death". However, the reference provided for this statement only says that he had a history of drug use (which can mean a lot of things) and not that this had contributed to his death.
IchiGhost (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug use contributing to death 
Talk:Basanta Kumar Biswas

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:List of universities and colleges in Beijing

message: The notation is not consistent. Only three are marked with the notation, while there are at least 10-12 national key universities in the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bayernjuven (talk • contribs) 21:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed the notation for national key universities

message: First of all, this is not ranking which is usually controversial. Second, by alphabet, the list is neutral. I think everyone agrees with me. Refer to List of universities in Tokyo.--Tricia Takanawa (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The list of universities shall be by alphabet. 

message: what about unis further out of beijing like:
Shahe University Park Station?
just coz they dont get article they dont get listed
wtf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.90.46.184 (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Unis 

message: At least the first link is no longer up to date. Noticed it in the course of an assignment research. --Seiken3 (talk) 14:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:David Wirrpanda

message: Just wondering if anyone knew why David's foundation spells it "Wirrpunda" if it's meant to be "Wirrpanda"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willo kenobi (talk • contribs) 07:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The foundation was named before he alerted everyone to the correct spelling of his name. The foundation will be meeting to discuss the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.154.74.114 (talk) 03:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: foundation spelling

message: 06:57, 25 October 2006, 59.100.172.123 added this to the article:
:Sharon Hayden is the Manager of this foundation David has said that she is wounder ful to work with and hopeing to make schools and more communities feel compfterble being indiganous.
I moved it to the Talk page.
As at 6 May 2006, the David Wirrpanda Foundation is spelled just that way, and moreover, Ms Hayden is the foundation's General Manager. --Shirt58 13:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving 59.100.172.123's comments to the Talk page 

message: I don't think anyone unfamiliar with the game itself or Aussie Rules' weird circuitous language is going to have the slightest idea what "Wirrpanda was met solidly by Geelong's Gary Ablett" means.
Any thoughts on a more universal phrasing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MuJoCh (talk • contribs) 15:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology
Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog Pocket Adventure

message: I've added some extra information to the article, such as the zone list and multi player info. (Galvy 14:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More information

message: i'm trying to look for information on this, and its very difficult, can't find any mainstream reviews from this. not even from famitsu...i'll try to look for more, see if i can find more. hopefully this game gets ported or remade.Lucia Black (talk) 04:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: tough article to save...
Talk:Erik De Vlaeminck

message: What is this all about the first name? In the title it sais 'Eric' and in the first line it says 'Erik' (also in the french Wiki. A look at google shows that both are apparently used with a one to eight preference for 'Eric'. Do there exist some official references for both names?Tommy from Belgium 09:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First name

message: Restored stub label on main page. In my opinion, it is almost up to a start class. Capitalistroadster (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored stub label on main page
Talk:David Prager

message: You cannot say that digg.com or Revision3 are not notable. Diggnation I believe has more than 20,000 downloads per episode. Please correct my numbers if I am wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.186.170 (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i am not saying digg.com or revision3 are not notable. i did not prod them. i prodded david prager. what i am saying is that they are not notable enough to justify multiple ancillary articles on otherwise minor people. Misterdiscreet 04:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 
Talk:Robot competition

message: I've made a first pass at rewriting this article to remove the "advertising" aspects and wiki-normalize it. More work is required: to clean it up; incorporate anything new from Robot about competitions, preparatory to slimming down the content in the Robot article itself; and to incorporate treatment of the various television shows, which are equally significant in this field. Comments and help are appreciated.
I have also formed the idea, as noted above, that this listing is best organized in master sections: open competitions, broadcast competitions, university competitions, high-school/children's competitions; and secondarily by format, i.e. ground, aerial, underwater; and then alphabetically. Almost all of the individual entries can be so categorized. Again, comments on this treatment and ways to handle the more comprehensive entries spanning categories are welcomed. Franamax (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite / Reorganize 

message: This was the Competitions and exhibitions section from Robot, which is at WP:GAR and needs cleaning up.  There are multiple problems here, and I see this Robot competition article already has a "written like an advertisement" tag, so let's get to work on this soon.  The first ref is a hacked page, the second ref is an undergraduate curriculum, etc.  I personally admire the Society of Robots competition, but it's not widely attended and there's already a link for them at Robot. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 12:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material moved from ''Robot'' 

message: The British TV show Robot Wars, in which machines built by amateur hobbyists battle to destroy one another, ran from 1997 to 2003. The machines, however, were radio controlled and had little autonomy.
- Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 12:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous and future competitions and exhibitions 

message: * Article has no sources and is not notable on its own merits Rogermx (talk) 20:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * Puck collecting is common enough as a competition task. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then start a page on types of robot competition. There are enough of them. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Puck Collect]]
Talk:Matthew Cooke Manuscript

message: I'll work on wikisourcing this - that's an excellent point, it does belong there. It'll for sure take me a couple days. Grye 10:52, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisourcing Text

message: I took the text straight off of the website. However, that text is a reprint of a 1923 article for which the copyright has long expired. Are we OK? Avi 20:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyviolation?
Talk:Ahmad Abu Laban

message: Tarek Fatah said on the CBC that Abu Laban supported the boycotts on Al-Arabiya.  Currently only Al Jazeera is listed.  --JGGardiner 16:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Should´n it be noted that Abu Laban commenting on a murder case in Denmark between two muslim families, proposed that the murders family paid the family of the murdered 200.000 kroner, because that was the equivalent of 200 camels. --Rasmus81 14:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Information on Abu Laban 
Talk:Alan Wilder

message: I may be beating a proverbial "dead horse" in saying this as the page has already had a notice posted regarding it not adhering to Wikipedia standards, but there are definitely parts of this article that lack NPOV and seem a bit biased and in some ways sounds like there were bits and pieces taken directly off a review site or magazine article somewhere (the Recoil section, in particular).  On a semi-related note, how is the background information on Joe Richardson relevant to a page on Alan Wilder?  Again, it sounds like it was directly taken from an article somewhere.  Regardless of what someone's views may be on the man or his music, the view presented should remain neutral and I'm not seeing that in some sections of this page. - Tuxenstein (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your view that some sections are biased is solely your own POV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.138.162.6 (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of View 

message: As a general rule, nationality should be cited as the statutory entitlement (British) rather than a sub-national identity (e.g. English). The exception is where an individual has publicly laid claim to a local or regional identity, as can happen with Scottish, Welsh and even Cornish identities maybe even English too, occasionally, but I'm not aware of any evidence that Alan Wilder has described himself thus. Has anyone else? I'm proposing to alter the lede accordingly unless there is a clear case to the contrary.HuginAndNotMunin (talk) 10:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Lance Armstrong/Archive 1

message: # Weave in information on the "livestrong" foundation. Yes, it's not just about the irritating bands.
# I read some wear that lance is an athiest, would that be worth including in the artical?--Zath42 09:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  CelebAtheists has him listed, with some sources (his biography and interviews etc): . Vclaw 16:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Based on this, his beliefs (or lack of them) don't seem to be easily pinned down. Saying anything categorically about it in the article would seem to be speculation. Cmprince 17:15, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests 

message: I think this paragraph should be mostly moved down to an "awards" section. The reason is that most of these listed are corporate (American corporate) "awards" rather than meaningful neutral awards. It represents a particularly American corporate POV to highlight the successes of their own prized and invested athletes, and likewise it seems like its advertising here. -SV|t 18:05, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph 2 

message: "competing in seniors' competitions from the age of 16"—from what age did he compete in juniors' competitions?  JHCC (talk) 19:22, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Early career
Talk:Seychelles Scout Association

message: As these appear to be the same for every scouting group in the world, I've removed them, but feel free to add them in again. Orthogonal1 (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Scout promise and law are not the same everywhere, cf. Scout Promise and Scout Law. --jergen (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Scout Promise/Law
Talk:Sepp Blatter

message: Talk:Sepp Blatter/Archive 1 Mobile mundo (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive for mobile 

message: The opening paragraph says Blatter is banned until 2027, but the infobox says until 2028. Which is it? Kornatice (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ban time
Talk:Handley Page Hastings

message: 7 May or 23 May 1946? Both dates are given. Drutt (talk) 00:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 7th May was the first flight - the 23rd May flight was a 2 hour handling and demonstration flight.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First Flight
Talk:Trøndelag

message: The article says (concerning the Swedish rule):
:This is known by some local Trøndelag historians as the genocide against the Trønders.
Since Jämtland (where I come from) and Härjedalen became Swedish before Trøndelag and still are parts of Sweden, one may wonder how much worse the "genocide" there was. I know that Jämtland and Härjedalen suffered a lot being handed over between Norway-Denmark and Sweden more than a dozen times in the 16th and 17th centuries, but not the suffering was not more severe than that there still are people living in the area. Since the Swedish impact on Trøndelag naturally must have much weaker, how can one speak about a "genocide"? If Trøndelag suffered a genocide, then Jämtland-Härjedalen must have suffered a complete extinction (which it didn't), right? I simply want to see some references for the claim that the event is denoted "genocide". Hunef 21:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hunted down the original source to the quote wich seems to be: A. Dybdahl og I. Bull (2005) Trøndelags historie; bind 2. 1350 —1850 Trondhem, Tapir Akademisk Forlag. I haven't validated the citation I won't put it into the wiki. On the topic of the "Genocide" I would not beleive it to be untrue. It is in line with the common Swedish policy at that time. Another example is the annexation of Scania at the same time, however the genocide in that area took part at a later date (1680). Wernty 05:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Genocide" 

message: I have to say that I find this section ridiculous. This is not even close to the quality standard Wikipedia should strive for. -- Nidator 13:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture 

message: As this source () shows the official English term is Central Norway, not Middle Norway. I will change the article accordingly. -- Nidator 15:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is room for three articles here, Trøndelag, Central Norway (redirect from Midt-Norge and Midt-Noreg) and Centre of Norway (which has been calcualted to be in Steinkjer municipality ()). -- Nidator 15:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made the necessary changes. -- Nidator 16:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central Norway vs. Middle Norway 

message: Jämtland and Härjedalen never was part of Trøndelag. "Øst-Trøndelag" and "Trøndeland" are simply jokes. Remvoed. Jon kare (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Härjedalen was most certainly an integrated part of Trøndelag, and so was Frostviken in Jämtland prior to it becoming Swedish in the 18th century as a part of a border treaty. The phrasing was perhaps a bit odd but after the Nordic seven years war in the 16th century the three provinces were administratively united in one entity. I think it's still worth a mentioning, and it does have it's own article (Øst-Trøndelag), I do agree on "Trøndeland" though. //Heimvennar - divider 14:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Øst-Trøndelag / Trøndeland
Talk:Southern Norway

message: In Norwegian "Southern Norway" is something else. We use that term as a blanket term for the combined regions of the west, east and south countries. "South country" is a better translation for the name of this region. --Tokle (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree with the above: Southern Norway is the East Country, West Country and South Country. But this article thinks Southern Norway = the South Country.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.19.208 (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, Southern Norway is used as opposed to what is Northern Norway, that is all counties from Trøndelag in the north to Agder in the south. Oddeivind (talk) 07:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Norway v. South Country