lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mile End, Montreal

message: Hello. I certainly like Dieu du Ciel and think it's a great bar, but it's not the only micro-brewery with local names given to beers (Helm's on Bernard does the same for example). Mentioning only this bar and saying that it's "a Montreal's favourite" (which might be true, but hey there's other websites for peer recommendation on buisness) results in this section sounding like auto-promo. I would either add other bars to balance this free advertisement or (preferably) suppress this section. Seeris (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion! I agree. I've changed that bit to refer to Dieu du Ciel more as an example of entrepreneurship that honours the neighbourhood. Jurjenb (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Free advertisement
Talk:Red Eye (talk show)

message: It's hard to believe if no source could be found that mentions their regular New York Times correspondent who was practically a fourth co-host. 
Rainier Blue (talk) 15:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: No Pinch
Talk:Pasillo

message: The article translates "Pasillo (English: corridor)". However, following the discussion here http://www.delcamp.us/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=52468 it seems to be more sensible to use the translation "Pasillo (English: little steps)". 84.141.150.96 (talk) 07:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Can someone review the following sentence:  "As it spread during the Gran Chaco period,"? Gran Chaco is a region of South America (Paraguay & Bolivia) and as far as I know pasillo music is not popular in these countries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.194 (talk) 20:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gran Chaco period?
Talk:Interstate 24 in Tennessee

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was Support merger. One of the opposes is from a blocked account, and the majority support the merge. --Rschen7754 20:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

message: * I saw that Interstate 24 in Georgia has been tagged for merger here. I'm inclined to keep the articles separate. It would be confusing to a reader going to the link for a Georgia highway to be redirected into the Tennessee article. I also don't think that the dip into GA is significant to be highlighted in the TN article; conversely, the fact that it is a dip from TN and one of the shorter spans of interstate in a state is significant from the standpoint of the GA article. —C.Fred (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger? 

message: When traveling westbound on I-24 and re-entering Tennessee, aren't you in Hamilton county for about 100 ft before entering Marion county? Should this be added to the table as a county it enters with no exit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.252.212 (talk) 12:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hamilton County

message: What further needs cleanup on this article? RJFJR (talk) 16:12, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The route description and history are incomplete; they're basically just random anecdotes about the road. --Rschen7754 20:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article needs some special header given that its title is not "Interstate 24 in Tennessee and Georgia". Georgia guy (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excuse me... 

message: I put a header; I wanted it to include only the fact that although the article's title says Tennessee only, it's about both Tennessee and Georgia. But I also got a "for other uses" sentence that I didn't want. Is there a special template that this article (and also any other article with a title that is mostly right but 2% or so wrong) can have?? Georgia guy (talk) 19:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than improving me, User:Imzadi1979 simply reverted me, as if the totality (as opposed to 98%) of the segment of the highway this article is about were in Tennessee. Georgia guy (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be an agreement amongst multiple editors that the Georgia segment is negligible (not unimportant; see this discussion and this page history). Equating it with the Tennessee segment could give undue weight. Bneu2013 (talk) 20:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header
Talk:Interstate 29 in Iowa

message: Since this was posted verbatim on both talk pages, let's only have one discussion. –Fredddie™ 23:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 6 overlap in Council Bluffs 
Talk:Interstate 29 in Missouri

message: Exit 3B says "I-635 exits 12A-B; tri-stack interchange."  "Tri-stack interchange" links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interchange_(road)#T_and_Y_interchanges which does not include "tri-stack interchange" anywhere on the page.  A page should never have a link where the linked term is not found on the destination. EvanJ35 (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit 38B Tri-Stack Interchange Link
Talk:Interstate 35 in Texas

message: Wow... there is so much construction to change the locations of the slip ramps and strange configurations of said ramps near Austin. --NE2 21:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recently came accross references to "IH-35", instead of the normal "I-35" abbreviation, and I see it's mentioned once in this article. Is this a Texas thing? Is it common? Why do they even do this... what's wrong with plain "I-35"? --Bigpeteb (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "IH" instead of just "I"? 

message: The article says that exit 292B is signed as I-60. There are no plans for an I-60 and no interstate currently numbered 60. Jdcomix (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 60...????? 
Talk:Interstate 44 in Oklahoma

message: Interstate 440 (Oklahoma) redirects to this article, but there is no mention of it in the article. --Zeruelx (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-440 

message: Where can I read information on Interstate 440 that used to exist in Oklahoma?  I am doing personal research on all Interstate/U.S. Highways in the U.S., however, I don't see anything about I-440, just like the person above.
Allen 21:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Best place to find info about old roads in Oklahoma is from old ODOT maps.  I-440 existed in the 1970s as a connector to I-35 to I-40 along the present I-44 route on OKC's northside. In the late 70s, it was renamed I-240 when it was extend to encircle most of the city. When it was decided to extend I-44 to Lawton in the early 80s, the portion that had been I-440 became I-44 and I-240 trimmed back to its present length. --Crimsonedge34 (talk) 08:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 440 

message: The article notes the Interstate was extended to the southeast of Oklahoma City.  I'd expect before the extension, mile 0 would be in the OKC area rathar than at the Texas border.  If so, some of the exit numbers may have changed. Will (Talk - contribs) 19:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the mile markers/exit numbers change?
Talk:Interstate 70 in Indiana

message: I have assessed this article as Stub-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* Expand the lead per WP:LEAD
* The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion
* The article needs references
master sonT - C 05:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments
Talk:Interstate 8 in Arizona

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
Another Arizona article hit the decks of GA. Congrats again, Holderca1.<FONT FACE="Anderson Supercar" SIZE="-1" COLOR="red">Mitch32contribs</FONT> 15:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review 

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking through the archive and did not find such a discussion. What do you mean? --PCB 20:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
Talk:David Madden

message: The following request to move a page has been added to Wikipedia:Requested moves as an uncontroversial move, but this has been contested by one or more people. Any discussion on the issue should continue here. If a full request is not lodged within five days of this request being contested, the request will be removed from WP:RM.  —Stemonitis 09:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Determining primary usage of a term is almost never "uncontroversial", so a full move request (as per WP:RM) will be required to assess such a proposal. --Stemonitis 09:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested move request

message: added link to (but no page for) David Madden, mayor of Ashland, KY. and author of book (pseudonamed emerson a essex) ISBN# 1403363811  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.255.15.9 (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: new david
Talk:John Mosquera

message: I need a source for he is currently on loan to FC Carl Zeiss Jena but injured. Matthew_hk tc 06:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current club
Talk:1964 FA Cup final

message: Amended West Ham's 3rd goal from Hurst to BoyceStatto74 13:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sojat Road

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Adventureland (United Arab Emirates)

message: The reason given for rejecting the copyvio does not seem to be quite on point, IMHO.  The stated rationale was:  "Declining speedy deletion. It appears that the article was copied by the other website rather than the other way around, based on the revision history and the copyright date of the website." The article as of 2007 looked like this.  But 1) the copyright date on the site goes back to 2008; and 2) copyright dates on websites (as distinct from books and magazines) are typically updated, even if text within it is not.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio rejection rationale 
Talk:Stepney Green tube station

message: The intro and the history repeat each other (and station history is not presently one of my topics). Jackiespeel (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The introduction is supposed to summarise that part of the article which follows the table of contents, see MOS:LEAD. As such, there is bound to be some duplication. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Drawing the attention of 'the proverbial stations-articles-developing-someone' to transform the repetition into a summary. :) Jackiespeel (talk) 23:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro
Talk:Surrey Quays railway station

message: The page should move to :Surrey Quays railway station (currently a redirect. This will conform with other stations on the :London Overground system. Kbthompson (talk) 23:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: The 'Surrey Quays within greater London' map is completely wrong - it shows Surrey Quays as being completely outside London, when it is in fact close to the river Thames. Ukch (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Swiss Cottage tube station

message: I'd assume a 'valid station' is one that http://www.tfl.gov.uk uses in it's travel directions. Maybe that's how we should clarify it?
Aapter (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: By "valid station", I believe that you mean "valid connection". See http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/67647/response/172834/attach/3/OSI%20Report%20May2011FR%20V2%2017012011.xls where neither Swiss Cottage nor South Hampstead are listed; compare Finchley Road, which on row 27 is listed as a 20-minute interchange with . Unfortunately that document can't be used as a reference, because it doesn't explicitly state that Swiss Cottage does not interchange with South Hampstead (a list of positives does not imply that omissions from that list are necessarily negatives). --Redrose64 (talk) 09:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Valid

message: I suggest that Swiss Cottage (Metropolitan line) tube station is merged with this article.
My reasoning is that when the Bakerloo station was built in the 1930s as an extension of this one; an map on page 53 of Simpson (2003) shows a subway under Finchley Road connecting the Met ticket office with a larger ticket office over the Bakerloo tube platforms; the article iself says that The new station initially operated as part of a combined station with the Metropolitan Line's adjacent sub-surface Swiss Cottage station (platforms 1 and 2 were Metropolitan Line and 3 and 4 were Bakerloo Line). Edgepedia (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The two stations were open simultaneously for just nine months - 20 Nov 1939-17 Aug 1940. The Bakerloo station was always intended as a replacement for, not a supplement to, the Met station. Besides, as I stated at Talk:Metropolitan Railway#Met-Vick Locomotive Rating, I don't trust Simpson to be a reliable source. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Simpson's reproducing a map from the Railway gazette (undated unfortunately) - it's not one he's drawn himself. The map labels two booking offices as the existing Met Station and the Bakerloo Station, but it's one complex; you can get enter the old Met station ticket office and via some steps and a subway get to the Bakerloo station without exiting (or passing any exits - the subway wasn't public). This looks to me like when Westminster got the Jubliee line station. Edgepedia (talk) 06:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Swiss Cottage (Metropolitan line) tube station
Talk:Temple tube station

message: Suggesting "Temple Underground Station" as it's not on the Tube; it's on the "cut-and-cover" sub-surface part of the network. Picky, I know. --Old Moonraker (talk) 05:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The have been previous attempts to re-name all the LU station names along these lines, but they're always rebuffed. Nick Cooper (talk) 07:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: Suggesting that references to the station's (approximate) appearance in a youtube video of a game be deleted. (It's not that I don't appreciate the Yogpod, but the general significance of this is doubtful.
Loren ipsum (talk) 23:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: May I comment without actually having seen the game? If the building has the approximate appearance of Temple station, isn't it original research to include it here? Support the deletion. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to be included, it should be reported in reliable independent sources such as The Railway Magazine or similar, and explicitly named as Temple in the report. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to minecraft video
Talk:West Kensington tube station

message: Actually I'm not sure what it's doing here. Access to the depot is not only at West Ken but also from Ken Olympia. Simply south (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the material doesn't belong in this article. However, the material is unsourced, and is of questionable notability by itself, so is not appropriate for a standalone article, and would likely simply get deleted. I have moved the material from the article to here until someone can decide what to do with it. There are three other depot stubs - :Category:London Underground depots. It might be possible to merge them all into one article - London Underground depots - if reliable sources can be found. SilkTork *Tea time 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lillie Bridge depot
Talk:Warren Street tube station

message: Quote from Victoria Line paragraph
"Along with other Victoria line stations, the new complex was originally decorated with tiles showing an illustration relating to the station's name – in this case, a rabbit warren."
The illustration is maze not a rabbit warren. I'm aware that the usage of 'warren' meaning a maze is derived from rabbit warren and that it is not standard. But the tile is a simplified drawing (more a diagram) of a wall maze. It is not diagram of tunnels. I cannot read the cited reference. OrewaTel (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a transcription error from the source, which says, verbatim, " Doesn't mean that it should link to the rabbit variety. Anyway, fixed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabbit Warren
Talk:Wapping railway station

message: We really need a better source than a blog for the re-opening date. TfL seem to be silent on the matter. According to this site, 15 April is "strongly rumoured", but that's not hard fact. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-opening 

message: What can be seen of the original entrance shaft?-96.237.79.6 (talk) 03:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  original entrance shaft 
Talk:Northern Daily Leader

message: is the "The" missing ? Dave Rave (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  why ...
Talk:Kwantlen Student Association

message: It was a mistake to merge this with the Kwantlen page. Both are separate, independent organizations. There are hundreds of other student union pages here on wikipedia, yet no move to merge those pages with the pages of their institutions.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.70.232.172 (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Deletion

message: This is a new article started on August 15, 2007. I am basing the structure of this page on the structure of the Simon Fraser Student Society page as it is a good page. I also hope to examine the pages for other student unions in the near future, to help make this a solid resource and history of the KSA. I hope to put in at least 5 hours per week over the next month toward developing this page.
My background with the KSA: I have been involved in the KSA in a number of capacities since 2001. I was first a volunteer, and then a staff person holding the position of Events & Programs Coordinator. In 2003, I quit the staff position and in 2004 I ran for a seat on Council. I continued to hold that seat into 2005. I was then forced out of the KSA due to a number of questionable activities that went on in 2005 and 2006. I worked with other students to take the KSA to the Supreme Court of BC where a Court Ordered election was called for fall 2006 - I then ran for and won the position of Director of Finance, which I currently hold.
Currently, the KSA is working to compile an online archive of it's past activities. During the time in 2005-06 that I was on the outside of the KSA looking in, I developed a section on my own personal site with many documents and articles about the KSA. I have always tried to maintain objectivity and I have only ever made claims on my site that were based on facts and source documents. 
A lot has happened over the last 25 years, and I hope to be able to provide information about that here. I hope others that have been involved in the KSA in the past will help provide information to make this a very informative article – one of many online resources that helps present the history of the KSA.
steveleenow 07:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome

message: I added the POV check tag to the article. This just requests that a neutral, 3rd party editor who's never worked on the article give it a read to see if it's neutral. GreenJoe 15:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is written more like a promotional brochure for the union. The first half needs citations all over and the "structure" section is written like it came directly out of a set of bylaws. SpigotMap 04:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV check

message: Over 100,000 Google references.  --Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:GNUM, WP:GHITS, and know that this was redirected per an AFD consensus. tedder (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: One - misspent funds - Two - CFS-BC court battle vs Kwantlen - Three - Four - Five - Six - Seven - Eight - Nine --Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent sources
Talk:Westbourne Park tube station

message: Maybe the Big Book of The Great Western Railway sheds light on this but when the Mainline station opened is something I have not found ckearly stated on the web' 
This site http://www.historytalk.org/Notting%20Hill%20History%20Timeline/timelinechap3.pdf seems to say that it was opened, as Green Bridge Lane station, when the Metropolitan Ry came in the 1860s.--SilasW (talk) 12:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, here's a reference to the station in 1861, in the Northern Echo: First recorded trainspotter was not man clad in anorak but 14-year-old girl Fanny Johnson, citing a 1935 article in GWR magazine. Onanoff (talk) 10:19, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date(s) and first name 

message: The long list of bus routes is a little misleading, especially for anyone who has walking difficulties. The only buses that actually stop at the station and the stop opposite are 28, N28, 31, N31, and 328. 36 and 18 run E-W along Harrow Road (A404), with the nearest stops about 450-500 meters from the station. 7 and 70 run E-W along Westbourne Park Road (B412) with the nearest stops about 350 meters from the station and downhill from it. While the 23 bus is based at the bus garage, it doesn't take on passengers there - the closest 23 stop is in Elkstone Road, about 250 meters from the station and down a fairly steep slope. Are there any guidelines for including them? --Marcus Rowland (talk) 23:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus routes
Talk:Conflict resolution research

message: There seems to be substantial overlap between Conflict resolution, Conflict resolution research, and Peace and conflict studies. Perhaps one or more merges are advisable. --Rincons41.210.24.210 (talk) 10:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlap

message: I propose merging Conflict resolution research into Conflict resolution. I think the content here would be better contextualized in Conflict resolution. Also, this article is poorly maintained.HudecEmil (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal