lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Polo neck

message: The article header suggests translation from the corresponding French article, but there is a big conflict - I've read over the French version and it says that the turtleneck appeared first in the 1890s as sportswear, used mainly for outdoor sports. The English article says the original turtleneck was used by sailors much earlier, so I suggest either the removal of the header suggesting translation, or looking into the veracity of both of these claims to its origin.
80.0.167.138 (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Does anyone have better pictures? The top one looks more like an ad for a beverage than a representation of a sweater. The second one is not lit well enough so the black sweater turns into a sort of blob. I guess the third one is fine, though it does seem strange to use a picture of a mannequin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.63.141 (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change pictures 

message: Removed the IDIOTIC statement about Polo necks being old fashioned.
They are NOT old fashioned at all. How do I know this? I work in Fashion. And when I say that, I don't mean a silly independant branch. Infact I work for YSL.
Thanks for irritating me by claiming such stupid things, when every store stocks them in the Winter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.209.158 (talk) 18:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In Britain, it's considered old-fashioned for men to wear them but not for women.  They've gone from being unisex to being female in Britain over the last decade or so.  Epa101 (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Fashioned? 

message: For your information, this article is now listed as "Good Article" in the French version. SEwiki (talk) 21:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Good article" in French Wikipedia

message: In the Disney film (1954) of Jules Verne's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, set in the 1860's, Captain Nemo wears a turtleneck. Even though I knew turtlenecks originally were worn by sailors, I was sure this was inauthentic until I learned on a fashion website that turtlenecks were first worn in the 1860's!
Interesting? Tom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.16.160 (talk) 00:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disney's Captain Nemo

message: So why does "Turtleneck" redirect to "Polo Neck"? --75.71.110.211 (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Polo neck has to be wrong (IMOHO)

message: This garment is a Polar Neck not a Polo Neck 2A02:C7F:2237:200:B41D:144:87FE:A9B3 (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you cite a source for that? Meticulo (talk) 11:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polar Neck 

message: As a non-native speaker I was wondering what it’s called in the UK? The intro gives polo neck for South Afrika and turtle neck for the US and Canada, but nothing for UK. CarlFromVienna (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's called a polo neck in both Britain and Ireland. O'Dea (talk) 13:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK
Talk:Borknagar

message: Borknagar is a melodic, progressive, folk/viking, black metal-influenced band
That area seems a little cluttered, more so by the next sentence: 
The band's style combines symphonic metal and black metal with viking, medieval, and traditional folk elements. Rockrox 23:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 

message: I'll remove the stuff about it being an acronym of Ragnarok. That seems to be a simple coincidence. Any objections? Fimbulwintr 03:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ragnarok 

message: English lyrics began to appear as early as The Olden Domain; also there have been a few different members over the years who contribute lyrics, not just the singer at the time. Thee darcy (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Appayya Dikshita

message: This article really really really needs a complete rewrite by someone who is framilar with the subject. I'm not quite sure if this is a real person due to the grammer. It almost appears as though it was translated with an free online translator, or by someone who is learning basic english. --zachjones4 23:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dikshitar graphically describes dvaita as the lowest step, vishishtadvaita as the middle step and sivadvaita and advaita which are very close to each other as the highest steps. He makes it clear in his work that Srikantha-Bhashya on the Brahmasutra has been written in very close approximation to the trend of thought of Adi Sankara in his own bhashya. Srikanta, according to Dikshitar, propagated his cult on the understanding that sagunopasana (Worship of name and form) is only the first step to nirgunopasana (Propitiation of the nameless and formless), and that it was the real intention of Srikanta that the final truth lies only in Shuddhadvaita. 
The last part of this sentence, which I have italicized above, is questionable.  The problem is that there is a reference to "Shuddhadvaita," which phrase as such is the name of a Vaishnava school of Indian philosophy (and both Appayya Dikshita and the philosopher Srikantha were Saiva.  My guess is that the intended phrase was the split phrase "shuddha advaita," or Sanskrit for "pure advaita," which written as such is equivalent to the direct English translation, which should be used, to avoid further confusion.  I reaquest any experts in Hindu philosophy or Sanskrit to please clear this up.--Krishnamurthi (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous phrasing?
Talk:Rapini

message: The article this page links to (http://whatscookingamerica.net/Vegetables/BroccoliRaab.htm) says that Rapini is the same thing as Chinese broccoli, which has its own page here on wikipedia and neither mentions the other.  Anyone know if they really are the same vegetable, and if so, why the pages aren't combined?
::The picture at Chinese Broccoli is definitely not broccoli raab, so I suspect that article at whatscookingamerica has some errors in it. A picture in this article would help. Spalding 03:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Acc to GRIN, rapini is indeed the vegetable you describe, but broccoli raab (or broccoli rabe as it's called in my part of the USA) is not this vegetable, as claimed in first paragraph.  GRIN identifies that vegetable as Brassica ruvo and separates it from rapini.  Can you clarify?  NaySay 18:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rapini is not broccoli raab or broccoli rabe 

message: I had them both, and I do not believe they are the same vegetable. 173.206.231.114 (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cime di rapa and friarelli 

message: This vegetable is quite popular in some german regions, like westphalia and the lower rhine region. and not only recently. the german wiki article "rübstiel" lists several other names. 188.101.91.189 (talk) 17:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: outside italy

message: The leaves that are eaten as "grelos" or "nabizas" in Galicia (NW SPain) and Portugal, are not rapini, but the sprouts of turnips, that are called turnip leaves or turnip greens in English.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemadrid (talk • contribs) 17:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rapini is not Grelos 

message: According to the Dutch version of this page, this vegetable is the same as Turnip top or Turnip greens as mentioned in the Turnip article.  Is it? Rp (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnip greens 

message: This vegetable is not at all common in Dutch cuisine. I have never seen it in any Dutch shop myself.131.211.45.75 (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Dutch cuisine 

message: This article lacks a scientific classification box (taxonomy). Please add it. Aminabzz (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific classification 

message: The correct article to link it to in German is 'Stängelkohl', and not 'Rübstiel'. I have no idea how to fix this using my phone, now. So I'll just write it here for later. 2003:C2:8705:E600:9270:58E5:B2E:5095 (talk) 23:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  German link
Talk:.uk

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Couks should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#Couks until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Couks" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Couk should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#Couk until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Couk" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I have today seen what appears a new second level domain for .uk - the instance being:
https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/
Looks like it needs to be added here?
Polyamide (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if it is a second level domain rather than a domain name with sub-domains. Might need a statement by Nominet that it is a new second level domain to clarify its status.Jmccormac (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New .public-inquiry.uk second level domain
Talk:£ (currency)

message: Does anyone have a source for the use of £ to refer to the unit of mass as well as currency.  If not, I will redirect £ to pound (currency). --Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 23:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My source was Wikipedia's own article on the apothecaries' system.  It could be that that article is incorrect; if so, that article should be changed before this one is.  Therefore, the question you are asking should be asked on that page, not this one.  I don't know for sure whether £ was ever used to refer to a unit of weight, but since £ is a stylized L standing for libra ("pound" in Latin), and since "pound" (the currency) takes its name from the value of a "pound" (weight) of silver, it's certainly possible that the symbol £ was at one time likewise polysemous. —Psychonaut 01:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this page redirect to Pound (currency) or pound sign? Ewlyahoocom 12:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tricky. Probably pound sign, but it's a tough call.Skittle 17:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Pound (currency) is a disambg page, so Pound sign is definitely better.  I've redirected accordingly. Tevildo 13:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have turned into a disambig.  The very fact that Skittle says "Tricky" above strongly suggests the need for a disambig.  Please see related discussion at Talk:€.  Arbitrary username 07:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Somebody redirected it to Pound--clearly out of the question.  I'd say it is fine as a disambiguation page that will get you to either article in the header here with just one click. Gene Nygaard 02:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I believe it should £ should redirect to pound sign, just like $. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 22:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Pound (currency)]] or [[pound sign]]?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Square Enix/Navigation

message: Is there anyway this template could be a bit smaller? Maybe remove a few links or breaking spaces? It does take up a large chunk of every bottom page.. — CuaHL 23:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed a slight ammount of whitespace, maybe as much as one line of text, which will hopefully help a little. Unfortunately the addition of the seperate discussion links, which I think are inportant to project navigation, have widened the initial list of links, they may linebreak on narrow displays. Extending the box width to 100% may help with that; the 90% is just for aesthetics. >Gamemaker 13:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, how about making the list more like  ala  or something similarly? I love the idea, and no doubt it's certainly handy, but I just think it should be more subtle somehow? Maybe when I have some ideas I'll post again ;) — CuaHL 20:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template size 

message: Is there no way we could make it so this template forces itself to the bottom of a page? It seems to be pushed up when you use edit this page + :/ — CuaHLe 00:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Positioning
Talk:Myotragus

message: Why mouse-goat, "μυς" means the "muscles" in greek?--Dewaere (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It also means "mouse", and is used in that context in a lot of scientific names. See here; the word apparently had a number of meanings. Ucucha 15:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.--Dewaere (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following sentence is not intelligible to me:
 The bone histology of Myotragus shows lamellar-zonal tissue throughout the cortex, a feature peculiar to ectothermic reptiles.
Shouldn't this feature be typical for ectotermic reptiles and, hence, peculiar to mammals?
--AcrophobicEagle (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence uses a(n older) definition of "peculiar" meaning "specific to," or "typical of," otherwise, yeah, the sentence should be changed.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: I've added quite a number of references. Although the article could still use more references, is it still valid te maintain the refimprove tag? DaMatriX 20:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess keep it for a while longer, maybe a month?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refimprove 

message: Can someone verify the reference that gives the weight of this animal? It states 50-70 kg in the text, which strikes me as an overestimation for an animal of its size.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.193.65.206 (talk) 02:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight 
Talk:Ansar-e Hezbollah

message: I've added some information and a link to a new article Hezbollah of Iran. The two groups are "shadowy" and I think their names sometimes used interchangably, but there does seem to be a difference between them. --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: I assume "ansar" in the name has some overtones of Ansar (Islam) and/or Ansar (military).  I just read a news article about Emerson Begolly which said he called Osama bin Laden "Amir of the Ansaar".  But not knowing a thing about this, and finding it difficult to search for, I can't write so much as a sentence that I'd feel confident to add about it.  Can someone more knowledgeable do something to elaborate this concept? Wnt (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connotation of "ansar" 
Talk:Chokhmah (Hebrew Bible)

message: This page should be auto-reffering to Chochmah (Kabbalah). The title here is inconsistand with the formal-proffesional transliteration, HTETrans - Hebrew to english translitaration system.
:The two should be merged, but I won't pretend to be an expert on which term takes priority. Maestlin 03:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. --רח"ק | Talk 06:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be en.wikipedia not he.wiktionary. Why isn't this article entitled Wisdom in Judaism or some other title in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines? cf. Google Scholar In ictu oculi (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:naming conventions (use English)]]
Talk:Baron Franz von der Trenck

message: Huh? There is nothing in the article that suggests that... V. Joe (talk) 04:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. GregorB (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Father of [[Military music]]?
Talk:Redemption (United States history)

message: Merge tags have been applied on a near constant basis for several years. Both articles represent the exact same subject matter and are acting as content forks. I've merged the entire content of this article, including sources into the Redeemers page. Let's work to improve the entire space there, and if someone wants to start a move discussion we can move the merged page if consensus so indicates. Sorry for acting boldly, but I saw two articles begging to be merged. BusterD (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged entire article into Redeemers
Talk:Jim Hughson

message: "In 1998, Hughson returned to national sports broadcasting, joining CTV Sportsnet (now Rogers Sportsnet) as their main NHL play-by-play commentator alongside Craig Simpson. A year later, he left radio and began working on the Canucks regional television broadcasts on Sportsnet Pacific, alongside Ryan Walter. Since 2002–03 his partner has been John Garrett."
Sportsnet isn't a national broadcast, it's a regional broadcast.
*Sportsnet had national AND regional broadcasts back then.  From 1998 to 2002, Sportsnet had the national cable contract for the NHL in Canada (instead of TSN) . . .  every Tuesday night an NHL game went across all 4 Sportsnet channels and was called by Hughson & Craig Simpson.  It was called "Labatt Blue Tuesday Night Hockey on CTV Sportsnet".  In the studio was Darren Dreger, Nick Kypreos, Greg Millen (1st year), and John Garrett (years 2 through 4).Djob (talk) 08:18, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Never Say Never (EP)

message: What makes this album notable? Hynca-Hooley 00:25, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It included a charting hit (Never Say Never, 1982) which appears on 10 currently available CDs (it is the original source of the long version). Fantailfan 00:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Good-morning

message: Is the external links section necessary? Ideally this information should be integrated into this article and referenced accordingly. Everkinetic (talk) 09:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I don't have a site to cite or anything, but it's my understanding that the good morning is also emphasizes the lower back.
I also think it should be mentioned that this can be an extremely dangerous exercise if done improperly; Bruce Lee's famed back injury, for example, was reportedly the result of inadequate warm up before and improper form while performing this exercise. -Dan 00:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lower back, potential for injury

message: Needed now? -- 08 May 2006
:I think there's enough information. Picture would be great, but I don't think that, not having a picture makes it a stub --81.175.153.160 11:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A link to, say, YouTube, showing someone actually doing Good-mornings would be great.  I should say that, at my prime, I routinely did Good-mornings with 380lbs for sets of three reps. 2600:1702:3020:1CD0:B103:1535:1F0C:95D3 (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Status

message: The picture used currently shows a variant of the "good morning" where the weight is not placed on the shoulders. To me, this is simply a "stiff-legged deadlift" or "romanian deadlift". What do you think?  -- Tierlieb 19:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good morning = stiff-legged/romanian deadlift?

message: The article says two dumbbells right now. While possible and I guess okay to mention, I think it would be good to include a note on how incredibly awkward and thus uncommon this is. That's pretty much like doing a back squat with dumbbells. There's a reason people turn it into a deadlift when they don't have a bar to go on the traps/postdelts. Dictabeard (talk) 11:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Two dumbbells?
Talk:Whitecaps Waterfront Stadium

message: If the 2018 FIFA World Cup does come to Canada, a 15000 seat stadium will be too small to host the visitors. Even at 10000 seats, Swangard Stadium was too small for the U-20s. Since BC Place Stadium will likely be used for the Whitecaps until this stadium can be built, I suspect that it too will host games. With its proposed retractable roof, it will be a better venue. Canada has not made an official bid for the 2018 games, and I doubt that it would succeed with the US planning bids for 2018 and 2022, and the requirement for large, natural grass stadia. A west-coast World Cup bid might fare better with games in Vancouver, Seattle, Portland, LA and several other cities in California.
I believe that Canada is looking at hosting the FIFA Women's World Cup first. 
I suggest we remove this section and restore it if either bid is actually made. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the BBC , FIFA have announced the eleven contries who have bid to host the World Cup in 2018 and 2022 and Canada wasn't among them. I'd agree with deleting the section. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree. Partially because this violates WP:CRYSTAL, but also Canada is not bidding for the World Cup.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 01:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential events?
Talk:Turkish Kurdistan

message: Population in the summary states as per source being 20 million Kurds as of 2016. I think it is worth adding the date to the text just for a bit of context and accuracy. TataofTata (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population figure could do with expanding 

message: Just a reminder that per WP:OR, content needs to be explicitly supported by sources. The sources I removed in this edit do not support the statement that the term Turkish Kurdistan is frequently used in academia. These are just a bunch of papers on unrelated topics that happen to use the term, it's the editor's interpretation that this amounts to frequent use, hence it's original research. The information can of course be reinstated with proper sourcing. --GGT (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: under demographics, last paragraph. "forced immigration since the 90s" definitely requires a source, which can't be provided as it's a baseless, subjective claim 95.5.137.106 (talk) 07:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase was sourced but it seemed copy pasted, so I copy-edited it a bit and updated the source.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 March 2022 

message: Editors are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Kurds#RFC: Iranian ethnic group. Levivich (talk) 00:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurds  "Iranian ethnic group" RFC 

message: The name “Turkish Kurdistan” is the name commonly used by Kurdish seperatists to describe part of the land they claim. I think re-naming it to “Kurdish inhabited areas of Turkey” or something along those lines could suit this page more. Syrianchessman (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant name?
Talk:Dahoum

message: Come on... This corny poem is obviously fake! Never saw it printed anywhere. I vote for its removal.Orlando F 02:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://books.google.ca/books?q=%22the%20pistol%20asleep%20in%20your%20young%20groin
The year of death (1916) doesn't match that given in the main article on Lawrence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.40.94.135 (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "A Photograph from Carchemish"?!

message: Not to dis this guy Selim/"Dahoum", but when more than half of the page ostensibly about him is actually about the (possible homo-)sexuality of someone else entirely (T. E. Lawrence), then maybe Selim/"Dahoum" wasn't really all that notable in his own right...--CRConrad (talk) 07:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the article perhaps be removed altogether?