lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:El Satario

message: Um, we have other porn film articles on Wikipedia that claim to be older than 1907, like Le Coucher de la Marie (1896) and Am Sklavenmarkt (1907).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.63.72 (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just watched this film for the first time. In no way is this film from 1907 and not made in Argentina. It was made right here in the Good Ole USA, southern Cal more than likely judging from the terrain and the guy in the devil costume is a well-known silent film personality; no Im not going to reveal him. This was made in the early to late 1920s or even the 1930s. Silent film cameras and technique were still utilised long after the end of the actual silent era 1894-1929. As crummy as the print of this film looks, it is too sophisticated for anything out of 1907: there is moving camera, pan around, closeup, tight editing, makeup with concealment that is convincing. Foreign stags would not have been allowed in the U.S. and confiscated at Customs. I'll never understand why so-called experts, be they writers, journalists, historians etc keep saying stags are from South America or France when they know the film would've been confiscated, destroyed  and arrests made for whomever it was addressed to. The women are more or less local Mexican prostitutes who are not worried about their identities and count on their exposure in the film as advertising.Koplimek (talk) 04:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Where exactly did you see this? --Auric  talk 18:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

text: How would you be able to judge the place is not in Argentinia? All your other claims are ridiculous as well. --91.2.167.122 (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest?
Talk:Castaneda, Switzerland

message: Beautiful picture in the snow.   Just a pity it's a picture of Santa Maria, not Castaneda!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.197.239.204 (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Juan de Bermúdez

message: The article says that Bermúdez was born ca. 1449 and died in 1570, meaning he would have been about 120 when he died. This is isn't impossible, but it seems highly unlikely to me. Could someone provide sources to confirm? Tom (talk) 10:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably he was born around 1475, because he was in Columbus first travel to America.--48coral (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth/death
Talk:El Lebrijano

message: Due to the death of this person, the BLP status of this article has changed. This does not mean that unsourced material that would contravene the Biography of Living Persons rules can be added to this article Capitalistroadster (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP status change
Talk:Lola Flores

message: Ethnically, she was not a gypsy, although some people considers she was Romani from a romantic point of view.  
She married a gypsy man, and according to gypsy law, the children of payos (non-gypsies) and gypsies are gypsies, so her children are well categorised as Romani people. 
Gaudio 09:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romani 

message: Article on Lola Flores is too shorfffffffffff±≥°←←←←←fffddggggt. She was a very important figure of the 20th century and this very short article does not do any justice to her.  The article must be expanded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayumadehrafti (talk • contribs) 21:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: This seems to be the origin of the unclear claim.  It was once tagged for clarification here, this tag was more recently removed without improving the text.  The now-removed "for the music critics she didn't know how to sing" may suggest a form of vandalism but it's ambiguous.  I don't read Spanish very well but am almost certain that the El Pais source just after doesn't support this text, because of the way it was introduced.  The original text before the first diff was supported by another source and was more likely to reflect it.  I suggest a return to that, or a rewrite of that paragraph...  —PaleoNeonate – 10:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enraged several generations of continents
Talk:Jens Kidman

message: Can someone change it to a better, "normalish" picture of him, please? This isn't Uncyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.51.64.193 (talk) 04:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: It's not a bio, it's a text about his work with Meshuggah... 91.154.212.254 (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography
Talk:Culloden (film)

message: The links to bfi are dead. The other internet link appears to be the blog of the man who made the film. I cant find any objective info to suggest notability, or to put in an info box.  High Heels on Wet Pavement 22:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: links

message: Filled in information, and included details from, the IMDb. SkierRMH 22:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDb
Talk:Luis Ortiz Rosales

message: This page is linked to mention of a Luis Ortiz Rosales, the phalangist who sheltered Gracia Lorca on the Garcia Lorca page. It could be the two are different people as Luis Rosales, the friend of Lorca, wrote for the phalangist press in the 1930s and 40s, gradually distanced himself from politics and the regime and died in 1992. Am I missing something? 99.240.139.189 (talk) 05:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rosales
Talk:Luis Ramírez de Lucena

message: The Oxford Companion to Chess suggests that Harold James Ruthven Murray's book A History of Chess should have more info on Lucena.  Does anyone who has it like to expand the article? Quale 04:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references 

message: Is the book that refers to "Philidor's legacy" Lucena's or Salvios?  François-André Danican Philidor was not born until 1726, so is it a different Philidor, or is the article wrong?  Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 03:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philidor's legacy  

message: We have a problem. This page lists both the years 1465 and 1475 as the birth year of Ramirez. Unfortunately it may be troublesome to correct as Google, World Pantheon, Chess.com, Arves and some other "reputable" websites including MyHeritage.com have used this Wikipedia page as their source, and they conflict-- some say '65 some say '75. One of those is a typo, but they've both been copied by others so I can't find a reliable source online. If no one else finds the hardcopy data I am considering calling a library for help. There must be a biography of the man. An actual book. 2603:800C:1100:D31:EEE5:7F04:6E27:C774 (talk) 13:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 1465 or 1475 ??
Talk:Spiny lizard

message: Can anyone identify which species this is?
Sign at the Houston Zoo just says "Spiny Lizard (Sceloporus sp.) Cburnett 06:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Species identification

message: I've removed the phylogeny section to the talk page (below) because it is pertains to only a few species (most formerly S. undulatus) and is not representative of the genus as a whole and its relation to other Phrynosomatids. More complete taxonomic discussion can be found in something like Wiens and Reeder 1997 or , which give more comprehensive coverage.--Animalparty-- (talk) 19:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny moved pending replacement.
Talk:GPA in Central and Eastern Europe

message: Since Central and Eastern European countries no longer share a common system, I propose to DEMERGE the article GPA in Central and Eastern Europe into TEN SEPARATE ARTICLES on grading in Russia, Ukraine, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania, Poland, the Czech Rep. and Slovakia, in the same way as it was done for Bulgaria. Also, articles on grading in the Balkan countries and in Belarus should be added. Sredni vashtar 23:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Obviously there's no common denominator among the grading systems in Central and Eastern European countries. Mentatus 08:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree. Central and Eastern Europe (EU countires) use ECTS - it's much different than system used in USSR! Central and Eastern Europe research aren't soviet/russian influenced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.73 (talk) 19:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed demerger
Talk:Maria Anna of Neuburg

message: Supposedly, Anna Maria Island, Florida was named by Ponce de Leon after the sponsor of his expedition "the queen of Charles II." I can't seem to confirm this link however. Student7 (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida 

message: This page contains no citations and only one working external link.  The article itself is very informal and does not seem to fit with the tone of an encyclopedia. I don't know very much about the topic of the article so I don't feel comfortable editing it for accuracy. I could try to edit what is in the article into more formal language, but I'd rather hear other opinions before I go through and make any changes.
144.89.85.230 (talk) 04:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Written
Talk:Maria Anna of Spain

message: Her name should be Maria Anna of Austria, of Austria was her surname and of Spain is just silly and misleading LPC (talk) 18:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "of Spain" is neither silly nor misleading. She was an infanta of Spain. It's so simple. Besides, she is just one of many, many archduchesses of Austria named Maria Anna but the only infanta of Spain named Maria Anna. Surtsicna (talk) 22:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, it is simple. Just because someone had the same name as someone else does not mean it is right to give her a convenience name. Look at any source regarding her and I bet you it will say of Austria. What you say does not exclude that her name was of Austria does it =\ And yes, it is misleading Monsieur LPC (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: In removing some of the article's passive constructions, I noticed that although the article mentioned her journey to Austria as lasting over a year, the dates mentioned were less than a month apart. Did her journey from Madrid to Trieste take over a year? Frankly, I suspect she might've even lived in a port city like Seville, or Valencia or Barcelona, and traveled by sea, which would've been quicker. Also, the sentence which says both that she listened yo the regent when her husband was away and also that she accompanied her husband on his travels makes no sense.Jweaver28 (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date problem 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Diego Velázquez - Maria Anna of Spain - Prado.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 13, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-13. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Diego Velázquez - Maria Anna of Spain - Prado.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:María Pacheco

message: A portrait would improve the article. Asarelah (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrait Request

message: There's a mistake here with the title of this article:  It should simply be "Maria Pacheco" as this is what is recorded, and as it is not a Spanish tradition, as in other European countries like England and France, for the woman to take her husband's name. Please see the Spanish article.
:Just use the move tab at the top of the article. Its very easy to do. Asarelah (talk) 05:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maria of Aragon, Queen of Portugal

message: I was just wondering if we have an official source on the portrait in her info box? The costume doesn't match the time period. Maria of Aragon (29 June 1482 – 7 March 1517) -- so the costume which looks very "Elizabethan" is rather odd. Can we get an official source please? -- Lady Meg (talk) 03:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait in Info Box
Talk:María de Padilla

message: Since all the other names in this article are in Spanish, and the main article for that king is Pedro, I'm changing it from Peter to Pedro.
RB3 13:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  peter-pedro 

message: Maria de Padilla was not of converso ancestry. This is conjecture same as the claim of her descent from the Prophet Mohammed.Welsh4ever76 (talk) 06:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just saw on numerous articles relating to the House of York that their "great, great, great gandparent was Maria de Padilla, of Jewish descent" and was curious what the deal was too. Strange. - Yorkshirian (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is strange that they would focus on this. She was Castillian and not of Jewish extraction. In fact I think her family was very much against the Jewish presence in Spain and had strict rules about associating with them. 76.92.210.222 (talk) 23:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Converso Ancestry
Talk:Wipeout (1988 game show)

message: Wipeout should come to GSN. I mean with Peter Tomarken gone, theu should have the rights to Wipeout.
--Nextbarker 06:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of reruns

message: Bobby Baker as a televangelist.  Somehow, that made me laugh; don't ask me why. - Desmond Hobson 14:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Favorite Wipeout

message: What exactly is a "special prize for children"? The Machine (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian star prize 

message: There's a new game show with the same name set to premiere on ABC in the US in June.  It does not appear to be related at all, so it looks like this page will have to be renamed.    Pimlottc (talk) 02:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it make more sense that the new show have its own page, leaving this one alone (and all the pages that link to this one)?  Note the multiple "Game Show" entries at Double Dare. HalJor (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It makes little sense to have two articles each with a title that could equally refer to either of them.  Article titles should speak for themselves wherever feasible.  I've just renamed them accordingly.  Wipeout (game show) could become a  at a later date. -- Smjg (talk) 16:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 season ABC show
Talk:Johnny's Jr.

message: It seems that I have made a mistake in assuming that the name of this group of boys would be grammatically correct. I've checked the official site and the title seems to actually be Johnny's Jr., with emphasis on the dot, so I'm going to request a move. -- Tydus Arandor 06:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding my move from [[Johnny's Jr]] to [[Johnny's Juniors]] 

message: Hey this page is badly out of date and doesn't seem to have much order. Many of the groups under active groups are no longer active, and groups like Taiga Team could confuse the reader on wether or not they are a unit when they are in fact just a dance team. Offically all of the boys in that team are not in units at the moment.
So, would anyone object to me moving BUTOUKAN and Snow Prince Gasshoudan to former units and putting in a note to say all the members are still apart of the agency and deleating Taiga Team section and replacing it with a 'Other Jr.'s' section? DSQ (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is badly out of date
Talk:Universal value

message: Move for deletion.  
There are no universal values listed (or even posited) on the page.  Without actual values listed, the page is meaningless.
The absolute critera for "all" humans in "all" times is a direct conflict with the concept of "morally good".  Absolutes are clear indicators of a problem.
:How about a merge with moral absolutism? They seem to talk about the same thing.--Hq3473 01:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are serious issues with this article. It seems to confuse values and actions. Most of the material here is probably more appropriate in the moral absolutism article, although given the lack of references, and probable POV nature of some of the contents, the merge would have to be done carefully. In spite pf the sense in the merge proposal, there are people who think that there are universal values that come with being human. I am not quite sure what they could be - friendship probably has a universal positive value, death of loved ones probably has a universal negative value - total POV on my part. Btw, not all values are moral values, and things can have negative value. Anarchia 06:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed my mind - don't merge - lets rewrite the article, using appropriate sources, to be about universal values. :) Anarchia 07:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality

message: I have removed the section based on Colero's presentation because the information was all about universal principles, not universal values. Colero does make a few comments (about 3) that relate to universal values, but these were not what was included in the article.Anarchia 08:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Section based on Colero's presentation

message: The following material does not satisfy as not WP:V or [[WP:RS]. Anarchia 21:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Material removed from the page

message: Hdjdkebdvevejeowosnsbzgsvdvdjdoeoelslsmbddvdvdbxnxnxbgxdyeiwklwmsbdvdgdgdheueuejejehdbdbdbdvrgeueytwtwuwiwowksndbdvdvdvdcdvdhsueieoeoekdndbdgdyeueiekkeei Dorbbeng Francis (talk) 11:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human values 

message: Currently the section reads as follows:
"The Chinese Communist Party has listed universal value as one of seven forces that threaten the Party's power, along with Western constitutional democracy, neoliberalism, civil society, Western journalism, discussion that challenge the historical legitimacy of the Party, and questionings over China's political policies.[9][10]"
Tracing through the citations, this ultimately comes from a 2013 Communique  from the Chinese Communist Party. Although the translation uses the phrase "Universal Values", what's meant is not at all "the set of values shared by all humans" as described on this page, but rather several specific "Western" values, translated as "Western freedom, democracy, and human rights".
Therefore it's not a criticism of "universal values" in the sense meant on this page, and should be removed.
eggsyntax (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the incorrect 'Criticism' section
Talk:Jeff Celentano

message: Note that I have removed the entire career section as a possible copyright violation of this webpage. The information was also completely unsourced, so if any of the content is added back in to the article, please ensure it's adheres to copyright policy and is reliably sourced per WP:BLP. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removal
Talk:Ordoño I of Asturias

message: Do you have a source that suggests she is Basque?  There may be (in fact there is) a source that says she was probably from Castile, and there may be a source that says Basques resided in Castile, but to string these together without an explicit statement that Muniadona is Basque is WP:ORIGINAL SYN. Agricolae (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, I do not have a source right now, but you may add yours. At this seminal point in Western Europe, name and ethnicity go together unless that name belongs to a status language, then it may be uncertain (we find Adalric to be a Basque in Gascony), you should know by now since as far as I see you are interested in medieval Pyrenean and north Iberian genealogy, and I think you are rigorous enough. I have no doubt that Munia is a Basque name (probably a variation of amuna/amuña, both meaning nowadays 'grandmother' in central dialects (amona/amoña) but possibly meaning another thing at that time (aitona, meaning 'grandfather' in central dialects), is "aitunen seme" = hidalgo in eastern dialects (Zuberoa/Soule) where aitatxi is currently 'grandfather'. Alfonso II's mother Munia was a Basque, 100 years before. Euskaltzaindia records the name in the present-day Basque area, but it's all around the central and western Pyrenees too. At that time (8, 9 centuries and later) all northern and eastern Castille (Bardulia, Cantabria,...) was Basque ethnic too, attested in Basque place and person names, that's why I added possibly, since many leads point in that direction and that's fair and relevant to provide the information. However, since we are sticking strictly to the rules, you may add your source. Iñaki LL (talk) 07:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muniadona
Talk:United Press International Athlete of the Year Award

message: Because I understand the first footnote to be relative specifically to the panel phrase, to-wit, to serve to qualify the constitution of the panel (as against, e.g., to serve to provide a source for or explanation of the entire sentence), I returned the footnote to a position anterior to the period.  If anyone thinks my construction of WP:FN to be incorrect (to be sure, neither usage here appears to be disfavored by FN, but I think it better that the footnote precede the full stop in order that such footnote should not seem to refer to the totality of the sentence [the principle source for which is provided infra in the references]), he/she should, of course, feel free to rv.  Joe 06:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOTNOTE|Footnote]] in [[WP:LEAD|lead]]

message: ...why? Sardanaphalus 22:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering this as well.--88.227.205.14 (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No award after 1995...
Talk:Tracht

message: Tracht means the historical dresses of the different tribes (inside germany/austria/europe). not only bavarians have Tracht.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.163.127.66 (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true, I put something in, but there is tons more to be said. 76.97.245.5 (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only  austrian, bavarian 

message: §Other uses said
:So "Tracht" can refer to the clothes which are worn, but e.g. also simply to a load, which is carried ( referring to the load of honey carried in by the bees)
The highlighted phrase is unidiomatic and unclear. I've changed it to what I think was meant:
:… still used by beekeepers, …
--Thnidu (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  beekeepers 

message: The german word Tracht is always used as to be the folk costume of any ethnicity. It is not the special term for german folk costume at all. Etymologywise it goes back to "tragen" (to carry something) and is used metaphorically still in the saying "eine Tracht Prügel verabreichen" (to beat someone thoroughly - i.e. to cover the victims body with haematoms and other beating marks). A pregnant animal is "trächtig" (it carries unborn offspring) but a pregnant woman is "schwanger" (an euphemistic espression for the hindered way off walking and the roundness of the womans silouhette).
If someone in Germany says he saw people wearing a "Tracht", he would have to say what kind of people that were - Herero, Inuit or Vietnamese?--85.180.238.108 (talk) 04:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: This is knitpicking, but the six major mountain costumes listed for Bavaria should specify Old Bavaria (Alt Bayern).  There are four major mountain costumes of greater Bavaria:  Miesbacher, chiemgauer, werdenfelser, allgäu. 2601:581:4500:6A6A:C0B7:8D72:30A0:F071 (talk) 22:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major alpine costumes of Bavaria
Talk:Aylesbury (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Since the Constituency Profile mentions Claimant Count figures from the Guardian, you might be interested to know that their source is updated monthly and can be found on NOMIS, or view Claimant Count data over time  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrounderUK (talk • contribs) 16:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)