lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Scouting in Puerto Rico

message: I removed the history section as it is a duplicate of http://bsapr.org/que-es-escutismo/; and it's not in English. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 02:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It also reads like an advertisement, which is not suitable for Wiki. Rlevse 13:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Needs ref for B-class. Rlevse 22:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Camp is not notable as separate from the council. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge per nom. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Guajataka Scout Reservation]] to Scouting in Puerto Rico 

message: Please See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Territories of the United States for discussion on the "United States Territories"  portal and I made comments on the PROJECT and why I've removed it from the page.
I carefully reviewed the project and its members' edits and found the project did not contribute to the articles but simply one member tagged the articles using WP:AWB (probably just to increase their edit count) and then they moved on.  If you see the discussion on the project itself, there isn't even agreement on the scope or purpose of the project.  So then, what is the point of reverting my edit and re-adding this project to this page? Are you planning on reviving the project, adding the pages to your watchlist and maintaining the project?  None of the four members listed on that project have ever contributed to the article Scouting in Puerto Rico or to any of the articles they tagged.  You can use this tool to see what I mean. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP inactive project
Talk:The Shroud

message: Highly POV goth-fan ravings. I've no clue if this band is notable, and on the basis of the entry I can't bring myself to do the research. If it isn't, the entry should be pulled. If it is notable, this should be completely rewritten in encyclopedic style. Uucp 20:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the original article was taken from the bands webpage.JanderVK (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think someone has some serious issues with The Shroud. The POV of the page was corrected to be more encyclopedic, and the page was still deleted! Not that a page with an explicit POV warrants an outright deletion. On top of that, someone keeps deleting The Shroud from the Ethereal Darkwave page.JanderVK (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup needed
Talk:Randolph B. Marcy

message: I added the stub 1-25-06.  I plan to expand it as time permits. Applejuicefool 20:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this mean that there used to be a dedicated page for Prairie Traveler? If so, what happened to it? Valetude (talk) 11:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His daughter is identified as 'Ellen Mary' on this site, but 'Mary Ellen' on McClellan's site. Which is correct? Valetude (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ellen Mary? 

message: 1. I have transferred the material from the overlong lede into the main article, and supplied a new lede that summarises the article at appropriate length.
2. Prairie Traveler: This book clearly merits a dedicated page, for which the current copy would be too short. Meanwhile it seems too long for an article about the author, not the publication, so I have edited-down.
3. Inspector General: On the Wiki page dedicated to Inspector General of the U.S. Army, Marcy’s dates of office are given as 1861-1881. This appears to conflict with the data on the Marcy page (up to today).
4. The botanical reference. This would really belong on a page about the relevant species, and linked-back to this one. Valetude (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-draft 12/4/15 

message: There is no mention of his parentage. Was he related to the statesman William L. Marcy (1786–1857)? Valetude (talk) 12:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relation? 

message: Why is his photo the first thing you see? 192.67.88.183 (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert Sidney Johnston?
Talk:The Way West

message: First of all, from my memory, the former senator is named Tadlock, not Tudlock. It has been a few years since I read the book, but my memory is not that bad. I will confirm this later; for now it is an FYI.
Secondly, the summary on this page makes it sound as though Tadlock is the main character and protagonist, while Elijah Evans is a secondary character/antagonist. This could not be further from the truth. The story focuses mainly on Lije Evans, his wife, and his son, Brownie. The character of Tadlock actually stands in opposition to Evans, and is written as a very unlikeable character, very much unlike the rest of the rural, lower-class settlers.
I am at work, and unable to do searches and detailed edits at the moment, but I will come back to this later. In the meantime, if anyone else wants to expand the articles authenticity, please do so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.43.89.134 (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lije Evans vs. Tadlock
Talk:Son of Godzilla

message: Godzilla is always referred to as being male. However, in this film "he" behaves more motherly than fatherly. Maybe, Godzilla is a hermaphrodite. In the end, he must have laid the egg there, there no other dinosaur being around.80.141.201.53 (talk) 13:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Godzilla is not a dinosaur. And there is no reason to suppose he/it laid the egg.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.169.39.45 (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godzilla's sex
Talk:Far from the Madding Crowd (1967 film)

message: Is it possible that many sheep were killed in order to film the scene in which they go over the cliff? 173.72.115.153 (talk) 02:00, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sheep
Talk:The Beast of Yucca Flats

message: The film opens with the murder by strangling of a woman who has just gotten out of the shower and is thus topless. The identity of the murderer is never revealed and the murder is never discussed after that scene. Javorsky is unlikely to be the killer because if the scene takes place before the movie, he is not the Beast yet and thus has no known motivation to kill a woman who he presumably hasn't met; if it is set during the movie, Javorsky still could not be the killer as the Beast never leaves the wastelands. Note: The narration in the movie mentions that Javorsky's wife had been killed in retribution for his defection. This may be the woman in the first scene. 
That still doesn't work because when you see the killer he his wearing the same clothes as Javorsky.  You can see his white shirt sleeves split up the sides.--Skeev 13:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The woman at the beginning 

message: This article is severely underdeveloped and needs to be expanded in more detail, and it needs to be reworded. There needs to be more information on the film's production and reception. Also the plot section should be rewritten since it current state is absolutely horrid. There are so many things that need to be fixed and expanded upon in this article, let's get to it!--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Don't Make Waves

message: Ummmm this was NOT what I was expecting when I searched for "don't make waves." Why isn't there a page about the proverb?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by M00npirate (talk • contribs) 03:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proverb 

message: "Don't Make Waves" was actually a good movie when it came out.  I was a Freshman at UC Berkeley and was impressed with its outlandish plot, subplots and sense of Southern California Americana, not to mention Sharon Tate, who stole the show.  The mudslide at the end was a brilliant closing to the movie.  And the plush cinemascope color was fantastic.  I taught at Cal Arts for a while when Mackendrick was teaching there and didn't know him that well but he seemed like a nice guy compared to the rest of the staff (Cal Arts doesn't have a tenure system so there's a lot of academic backstabbing going on).  Sharon Tate could of been the biggest movie star in America--all us young guys back then were really ticked off when she was murdered.  It was the worse case of a waste of a human life that I can recall.  Terrific movie though, really entertaining.  And Claudia Cardinale was really cute.  Movies from the 1960's were actually really good, using high quality filmstock, professional art direction, great camera work and editing.  They're a class of movies unto themselves.  In the 1970's movies lost their quality sheen and started looking grainy and amateurish.  "Don't Make Waves" is iconographic and rather than being a genre film is quite unique in its own right.  I'd give it 4 stars****.  70.237.15.131 (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Don't Make Waves" is a High Quality Movie
Talk:The One-Armed Swordsman

message: The second Zatoichi film, "The Tale of Zatoichi Continues" (1962), features a one-armed swordsman. Is there any information that claims this film influenced the other? The Tale of Zatoichi came out about five years before this one. --Ghostexorcist 21:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence

message: It would be good to include a picture of the modified hook sword the film is famous for; one in which the small prong locks the opponents sword. Setenzatsu (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sword lock picture
Talk:Mission Stardust

message: I added more references to expand the article. If anyone disagrees, please add more refs and change the text. After all, that is what Wikipedia is about. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a bit more on the release and reception and added an infobox and cleaned up the article a bit. A lot of links were dead, so I hope this helps. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: More References

message: So I was looking up movies and found this, "Thora Queen of Space", that became obvious is simply Mission Stardust, but I am not able to find nay other reference to this title. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GStOWVGTJK0
Anyway, can anyone find this title used elsewhere and if not, should this link be used to reference the title used if no other source is found? MarvelAge91 (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone find confirmation on an alternate title?
Talk:Batman Fights Dracula

message: I can't confirm whether Batman Fights Dracula was a fan film or not. I can't even find a source to confirm that it was unauthorized. Doczilla 09:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The above comment was made 3 months after I was born but there's no sources saying it was authorised either, and the amount of unnofficial films originating from the region from the time is staggering, and the lack of any DC labelling on the poster we DO have indicates it's of similar nature to 3 Dev Adam, an infamous Turkish unathorised film starring Captain America and "Spider-Man" Borbies (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  17 years, huh
Talk:Hotel (1967 film)

message: "After contacting the NAACP, they inform McDermott that they had not had anything planned for the St. Gregory in terms of allowing blacks to check into the hotel." What does that mean? Needs clarifying.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:8101:6A37:450E:FE42:45AB:5189 (talk) 09:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear plot description 

message: ...that black woman playing piano & soulfully singing... in the Hotel lounge?? 170.213.2.73 (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  who's who??
Talk:The Gnome-Mobile

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs-infobox" tag 

message: The opening paragraph is horribly opinionated; I am revising post haste!76.120.66.57 (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening paragraph

message: The Plot summary section states that D.J. Mulrooney with his grandchildren detour to Redwoods National Park during their trip from San Francisco to Seattle.  Redwoods National Park was created in 1968, a year after the film was released, and most certainly didn't exist while the film was in production, nor when the Upton Sinclair book was published. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)T @ 23:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redwoods National Park
Talk:The Plank (1967 film)

message: Two snub articles, mostly covering the same ground.  Better, I think as a single "The Plank" article covering them both, the original episode of "Sykes and a ..." and any differences between versions. Duggy 1138 (talk) 13:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also, the film's "dialogue-free" status is highly exaggerated - there's actually quite a lot of real dialogue in the film. Lee M (talk) 04:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy with the merge - the 1979 remake doesn't require its own article.--A bit iffy (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Apart from the casts, which still have a lot in common, basically it's the same film. The 1979 could profitably be a subsection on this article. Rodhullandemu 22:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I oppose. The films may share the same storyline and re-use some of the cast and crew, but are still two separate productions. --Bensin (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Bensin, you may want to do a search engine test for both films. There is not a lot of coverage for either film. I think it is a good idea to merge them because instead of two barren articles, we can have one article that reasonably summarizes both productions and even compare and contrast the cast and crew. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062133/fullcredits
193.116.229.24 (talk) 10:28, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info Cast ....
Talk:Any Bonds Today?

message: Just wondering if Anyone is interested in the Video, which seeems to be the whole thing, Blackface and all. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65yiEG6haik&search=Any%20Bonds%20Today%3F --58.164.129.7 09:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Found 

message: Not like James Bond, I'M TALKING bonds! AdwenKnowItAll (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A song from bonds and commercials within the anthem of USA 🇺🇸!
Talk:Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book

message: Is this an "American" film as the article says?  It's produced in England by Alexander Korda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.8.213.169 (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually no. Both brothers Korda left Britain for Hollywood during World War II. This is one of the films they made there. It should be mentioned in the article, though. I'll try to fix it. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 05:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These are the three titles I found on the internet for this film, mainly in original by-time posters and especially with the title Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book. Should we move the title of the present article? Kintaro (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Jungle Book''... ''The Jungle Book''... ''Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book''...
Talk:Donald Gets Drafted

message: Where can I find an audio file of "The Army's Not the Army Anymore"? 71.111.215.224 00:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio of Song 
Talk:Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips

message: 76.90.248.68, please discuss here before reverting your edits yet again regarding Lola Bunny. I suggest we follow the widely accepted bold, revert, discuss cycle. My main problem with your edits is that they are unreferenced and therefore look a lot like original research or a personal essay, both of which are against Wikipedia policy. If you want to add such details to Wikipedia, you have to cite a reliable source. See Introduction to referencing to learn how. Meticulo (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lola Bunny
Talk:Bugs Bunny and the Three Bears

message: Stan Freberg claims on a DVD commentary that he was the voice of Junior Bear and Billy Bletcher replaced Mel Blanc. Any truth to this?Foofbun (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Voices
Talk:Thorn in the flesh

message: Not verifiable, and therefore no good for inclusion, but I'm told that a professor at General Theological Seminary in the late '50s maintained (or at least pretended to maintain) the "bicapitular theory of the thorn in the flesh", saying that Paul's statement "I am of two minds in this matter" indicated that he actually had two heads.  JHCC  (talk) 20:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: This article needs substantial revision to remove the "health and prosperity movement" bias.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.150.21.148 (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highly biased
Talk:Duck! Rabbit, Duck!

message: The correct title should be "Duck! Rabbit, Duck!" not "Duck! Rabbit! Duck!"
207.31.229.4 14:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Which means what? There's nothing in the article explaining what was left out of the theatrical release. 86.143.48.107 02:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably means "uncut, unlike the way it's often shown on television".  I believe it is sometimes shown on TV with the gunshots-to-the-head censored.
207.31.229.4 15:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, that's exactly what I meant when I wrote that tidbit any number of months back. —  Cinemaniac 00:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD is "restored and uncut"?
Talk:Jokikylä

message: Can somebody please write again with no incorrecly words?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sano mitä sanot~enwiki (talk • contribs) 26 January 2006 (UTC)
:modified/improved since 2006--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hot Cross Bunny

message: does anyone know which St. Joe Bugs was mentioning in the short? Visokor (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Joe 

message: When Bugs is in the wheelchair and he makes his face look like an old guy and he says "I'm the mayor of the town. You can't send that boy to prison." (or something like that), is he supposed to be parodying a celebrity or fictional character that was popular at the time (those cartoons heavily parodied things that were popular back then but now forgotten), or is it something that was made for the cartoon?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NatureLover96 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugs in the wheelchair
Talk:Hillbilly Hare

message: Keith Scott, the Australian voice actor and scholar, has discovered that the voice for the red-haired hillbilly is John T. Smith. --- JS, 70.129.41.10 20:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice Acting Discovered

message: Nothing big here, but I can confirm that this airs censored on Teletoon Retro (the Canadian version of Boomerang) with all the scenes mentioned, deleted. It's a shame you have to buy a friggin' DVD to get the unadulterated version. :-/
Macshill (talk) 06:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: The Golden collection commentary mentions that some Termite Terrace people were doing some square dancing during lunch (as memory serves.)  That probably served as an inspiration for this show.
75.71.200.117 (talk) 01:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a secondary source, include that by all means.  Unfortunately, this page is so lousy with "original research" so I don't even think it would matter if you did. NewkirkPlaza (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Square Dancing
Talk:Water, Water Every Hare

message: I'm pretty sure what the scientist actually calls the monster is "Bruda" not "Rudolph" 
I note that in the film "Count Yorga, Vampire" - the count refers to his large barely-speaking manservant as "Bruda". I'm not sure if there is some historical meaning to this term. Google yields no insights.  
I did find interesting youtube showing Cartoon Network's captions of this short and it tells us that the scientist is addressing the monster as "Rudolph". I still don't hear it like that. Perhaps you could listen to this vimeo and weigh in thank you. 
CITIZENS! around 3 minute mark, tell me whether the scientist is addressing the monster as "Bruda" or "Rudolph"
http://vimeo.com/93231191
- MistySpock (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for name "Rudolph" ?
Talk:New Guinean pound

message: I suggest it is dubious to identify a New Guinea pound, when no pound notes were ever issued, nor any coins higher than one shilling. The pound referred to was always Australian. I would suggest the New Guinea pound never existed as a currency, and that the coins as New Guinea pennies and shillings are all that can be identified as New Guinea currency. This article should be deleted. Ptilinopus (talk) 07:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious distinction
Talk:The Scarlet Pumpernickel

message: question: does anyone think this short served as an inspiration for Tiny Toons episode Toons Take Over? Visokor (talk) 06:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  query
Talk:The Great Piggy Bank Robbery

message: Warner Brothers actually used a picture of Duck Twacy for a pamphlet about non-discrimination against homosexuals. The hat was gray, but so was the hat in
the Piggy Bank robbery.
The spoof of the Batman in this cartoon is interesting, as aside from alluding to the influence of Dick Tracy on the Batman strip, this is one of the few pre-1960's homages to character in other media. 
23:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: =Warner Brothers pamphlet regarding non-discrimination policy about homosexuals

message: Doubleheader (spoof of Half 'n' Half),
No, H n H did not debut till the 1960's. 
23:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Half n' Half did not show up till the 1960's
Talk:Rabbit of Seville

message: The first two of these seem to only have a weak tie to the main article. The same-sex marriage factoid reads like weasel words to me, i.e. "may qualify as one of the first".
:* The gag of rising barber chairs also appears in Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator.
:* The gag scene where Bugs and Elmer try to outdo each other with bigger weapons is repeated in an episode of Disney's Darkwing Duck when Darkwing-who has been turned in a evil twin copy of Negaduck-and the real Negaduck also try to outdo the each other with bigger weapons.
:* The cartoon's closing gag involves Bugs and Elmer getting married. Although they belong to different species, they are the same gender. According to Film Threat, this may qualify as one of the first, if not the very first, example of same-sex marriage in a motion picture. 
bantosh (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references 
Talk:Åkerbo Hundred

message: Split of Åkerbo in Östergötland as a separate one: http://www.vardnas.net/Harad.gif shows Åkerbo Hundred of Östergötland as brown in the centre of the province.
Makes me wonder how many more of these stubs about old Swedish geography are erroneous. Kriko 14:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fast and Furry-ous

message: What does being the only Road Runner/ Wile E. Coyote cartoon produced in the 1940s (putting aside how utterly trivial that piece of information actually is) have to do with etymology?--172.190.70.219 (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?