Template talk:Infobox river

message: Please swap rows 3 and 4, so that the sequence is min / av / max. This will then match the width and depth outputs.  — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 09:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please revert this change, the parameters were ordered that way for a reason. See the discussion from merger of Geobox river into this template. Shannon [ Talk ] 21:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , please be ready to discuss with @GhostInTheMachine — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Shannon [ Talk ] 21:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The archived discussion is lengthy – which bit should I be looking at? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 17:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

text:   !  — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 August 2023 

message: It would be ideal if this infobox had a parameter for topographic maps as there is for . Volcanoguy 04:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't most notable rivers cross more than one 1:25000 topographic map? Would it be a list of topo maps? — hike395 (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably be a big list for major rivers (which I don't recommend) but the same could be said for major mountain ranges (e.g. Rockies, Andes, Alps). There's a lot of articles about small rivers and creeks that would appear on only one to a couple topo maps. Volcanoguy 19:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I normally use  for listing topo maps in  as can be seen in Mount Edziza volcanic complex. Volcanoguy 21:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topographic maps 

message: The template uses and the  call checks for 152 parameters. The template data listed 135 of these and I have imported the 17 extras. However, there are no template data descriptions at all and the  section described just 59 60 62 parameters. I am reluctant to add missing parameters without a suitable description, but will attempt to add ones I do understand. Please review my descriptions and add more  — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation 

message: * Should  etc be removed / killed / expunged / deprecated? I found just four uses of any of these and changed them all to use  instead — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 12:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unused parameters? 

message: Are these available on this template, like on Template:Infobox settlement or Template:Infobox public transit? Trying to figure out if it is possible to include multiple maps in the infobox. See Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Preference_of_using_OpenStreetMaps. Shannon [ Talk ] 16:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional image or map parameters 

message: Hi,
I recently expanded the article about the discharge regime (which was previously grouped with river regime) to the point where it is not a stub anymore. I tried to decentralize it from the Alpine region where it is most commonly used and make it more globally balanced and I think now the article is developed to the point that a parameter for discharge regime could also be added to the infobox. I am thinking that the parameter would give just basic information about the regime, i.e. temperate pluvial, mediterranean, Texan, tropical pluvial/intertropical, equatorial, nival, nivo-glacial, glacial, nivo-pluvial, pluvio-nival, uniform, complex; and not all the subdivisions that are listed, maybe with addition of the month when the peak occurs, e.g. tropical pluvial (peak in September). What do you think? Garygo golob (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of discharge regime parameter