lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Béla Fleck and the Flecktones

message: I worked up a Flecktones template, based on what other bands have (see Template:The Beatles or Template:Metallica).
What do you think?  Anything I should add to it? Dan 21:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright then, if there are no objections, I'll start adding it to the album/band member pages. Dan 15:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: This entire section appears to be  Original Research. Furthermore this it is based on a nonstandard usage of Modernism that can not be supported. From the Modernism page:
specifically, the term describes both a set of cultural tendencies and an array of associated cultural movements, originally arising from wide-scale and far-reaching changes to Western society in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
As such it is rarely if ever used to describe music. There may be things to say about innovation by the band but they would need to be supported by citations, and be noteworthy enough to distinguish them. The use of the term modernism in this respect can not be supported. Tallus (talk) 21:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Béla Fleck and the Flecktones and Modernism 

message: Good article, interview with Fleck, some insights into band's history:  Has some stuff that could be useful here. --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  band history 

message: As of 2011, Future Man seems to have a brand new custom drumitar that is not SynthAxe-based.  Could use an update to the history section to address this. 24.38.102.53 (talk) 15:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New drumitar 

message: Ok, I found these in the references section. They weren't placed as inline citations; two are dead links, and the last two have real potential for use there in the text. Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I found these sources in the references section but... 

message: Is there a reason Sam Bush is not counted as a member after touring with the band in 1995? 50.68.8.184 (talk) 01:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sam Bush?
Talk:Tom Berenger

message: The reference to Berenger's use of Scientology as an excuse to have an affair and break up with his second wife seems a little biased to me, and it isn't referenced.
::Berenger, Tom (Actor):
"This week's Globe has an article on actor Tom Berenger who is divorcing his wife. He is claiming that they are divorcing because she is a scieno and has spent thousands and thousands of dollars on it." - jbwebb@gramercy.ios.com "The article says, 'Calling it a "cult", in court papers, the 47-year-old star asks the court to ban his wife from sending their three kids to Scientology classes or giving the group money from his child support payments.'" - Sue, Jigsaw6452@aol.com.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.46.49.98 (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Divorce reasoning

message: I remember, in the late 70's or early 80's, a short-lived TV show (maybe 3 shows before it was canceled) called, 'Beringer's'. Tom Beringer was the main character and the head of a wealthy family - I guess as an answer to Dallas or Falcon Crest or that other show with the Carringtons.  Anyway, I can't remember if the show's name was spelled the same as Tom Beringers and I can't find any mention of the show anwhere on the Internet.  I know I'm not crazy.  I was very excited about the show because I liked Tom Beringer.  Now it seems I'm the only person who remembers it...
Dina12145 (talk) 02:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short TV Show Deleted From TV History 

message: check :  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000297/?ref_=tt_cl_t5
JohnHemel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.46.219 (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  some missing film(s) here  ............  2015 Impact Earth   ............at least 

message: One of the best movies ever tom and Sydney poitier. I saw it a couple times. Can find it. Dansmead3 (talk) 09:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another movie
Talk:Seattle Center

message: I'm working heavily on Century 21 Exposition. If someone wants to expand this article, I suspect that a number of the sources I am using there would be helpful. - Jmabel | Talk 00:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I did a lot there. That is now a "good article". I just now found a fascinating source that I have added as an external link here and there: "Seattle Center", p. 18–24 in Survey Report: Comprehensive Inventory of City-Owned Historic Resources, Seattle, Washington, Department of Neighborhoods (Seattle) Historic Preservation, offers an extremely detailed account of the history of the buildings and grounds. It would be very worthwhile to "mine" it for background. I'm not sure quite how it should be parceled between the two articles, but I'd say that up to and including 1962 belongs in the Exposition article and post-1962 here, with a cross-reference to the relevant section for the earlier history. Any objections? - Jmabel | Talk 00:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Century 21 Exposition 

message: I recently uploaded an aerial photo of a portion of Seattle Center, below. Feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 09:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New aerial photo 

message: The new skatepark is located on 2nd and Thomas. It opens july 11th.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.102.189.164 (talk) 18:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skatepark 

message: * https://www.seattlecenter.com/explore/arts/public-art
---Another Believer (Talk) 03:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public art
Talk:Supreme Court of India

message: Why is America, a first-world country, still using paper ballots for the US Presidential Elections? Here is a brief history and reasons as to why Americans still cast their votes for presidential elections via paper ballots, and not by electronic voting.
@ In Short Reports have it that Americans feel safer in using paper ballots. Printed ballots started in the US long after Revolutionary War. Only form of e-voting in the US is via email or fax. In two days, the United States of America with have a new President. High chances are that it will be either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. If surprise is in store for the world, then it could be Jill Stein or Gary Johnson, or even Evan McMullin.
In fact, if a free-spirited, chicken-loving American citizen wants to vote for a KFC wing, they could do that too. Because even after over 15 years of debating over taking up electronic voting, America still uses the paper ballot system to elect their president.
@ My questions is to supreme court of India and the citizens of India that why we also not reject this Evm system of voting system? Because their is no transparency in Evm system? Why we not use ballot paper for voting in India for transparency? Is India is  developed country like America, if not developed then what is reason behind this, China is a devloped country this country get freedom in 1949 and India get freedom in 1947 , Who is responsible, citizens of India always paid taxes, then why we not a developed country? Is anyone follow the rules regulations according to constitution? Why many judgement pending in courts? Why the people of India are unemployed? Why the farmer and students always committed suicide? Why do the people of India not get justice? I'm Manish Kumar Mishra a Indian student and this is not only my duty to fight alone for justice, everyone have to raise they voice for truth. जय मां भवानी जय मां जगदम्बा जय परशुराम हर हर महादेव 🙏 अल्लाहु अकबर (ٱللَّٰهُ أَكْبَرُ)🙏 वाहे गुरु जी दा खालसा, वाहे गुरु जी दी फतेह🙏 God bless the people of India and World 🙏 Amen...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Manish Kumar Mishra (talk • contribs) 18:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Talk:SARS conspiracy theory

message: Even though every major country in the world has accused the other of creating this virus, it has been pretty much proven that it crossed the xenographic barrier from civet cats to humans naturally. PETN 13:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: , , , other links found by .  Yes, article ought to cite supporting sources. I'm busy with other stuff at present but perhaps I'll come back later and take a whack at improving this article a bit, especially as regards WP:V. -- Boracay Bill 02:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The article asserts: "... hinting that the Americans have the cure for SARS if they are in fact the creators of this disease.[citation needed] The United States government has officially denied that it has any relationship to the development and spread of the SARS virus.[citation needed]", but cites no sources hinting that the U.S. has a cure for SARS and cites no source supporting the claimed so-called official denial by the U.S. government.  I have spent a little time looking for supporting sources without success.  Unless someone supplies supporting sources for these assertions, I will probably remove them from the article in the next few days, along with another unsupported assertion: "Notably, an expert from the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention of China, Hou Yunde, who initially denied that SARS could be man-made, later admitted in a SARS seminar held by the Chinese Ministry of Health in December 2003 that it was possible.[citation needed]". -- Boracay Bill 00:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Incorrect

message: In the lede, there is a claim that Nikolai Filatov, with Wikilink to information on him, stated that SARS was artificially constructed. That's rather odd, given that Nikolai Filatov, per the Wikipedia article on him, died in 1935. Can someone kindly look into the issue or are we now championing conspiracy theories that require a time machine to work?Wzrd1 (talk) 03:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The archived News24 article definitely mentions "Nikolai Filatov". The simple answer to your question is that there are two different people who have the same name. I have removed the Nikolai Filatov link. CowHouse (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede with odd, impossible claim 

message: Does anyone oppose removing these tags? All the sentences have citations, and a random selection of sources appears to bear out the claims. It appears that, at the time the tags were added, there was a paragraph about Tong Zeng's claims that wasn't backed by its citation, but the offending text has since been trimmed. There's also an article in the external links which should probably be either incorporated in the text as a source or removed. Am I missing anything? Daß Wölf 14:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed accuracy and original research
Talk:Lokayata

message: This page can be deleted as the same topic is discussed in the page carvaka, which is another name for Lokayata.  I created this page when I could not locate anything with this title and planned to develope it later. Only afterwards I came to know of the existence of the page titled carvaka. I request any of the administrators to delete this page.
MANOJTV 09:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:Languages of Slovenia

message: Excuse me, but what is the idea of this category? Or all "Languages of..." categories?
There are typically too few members to bting it into the are where a category starts to be usefull. 
In the languages article it is mentioned, where it is spoken, and in the country article it is mentioned which languages are spoken there. And in the articles these statements can be qualified, whereas the category gives only a yes/no decision.
Pjacobi 09:16, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Spartan Marching Band

message: I have reverted this page to the version before December 3. The material added then was an apparent copyright violation.
Text that was previously posted here appears to infringe on the copyright of the text from the source below: 
http://music.msu.edu/smb/ 
If there was permission to use this material under terms of our license or if you are the copyright holder of the externally linked text, then please indicate so on this talk page and on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. 
--rbrwr± 09:28, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Jewish population by country

message: The table gives the percentages of the eligible population for each country, and when I added them up, starting at  the country after Hungary (Hungary is #13), I had a running total of 2.53% by Panama (#31). Did I calculate it right? Polar Apposite (talk) 09:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Polar Apposite 172.56.70.195 (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Can someone please tell me how I can get access to edit box for the pie chart? Polar Apposite (talk) 16:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

text: There does not appear to be a "connection" between the "Table" and pie chart. Thus, anyone changing one may not realize that they need to change the other, as well. This goes for the list in the 2nd para of the page, as well. Skaizun (talk) 16:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pie chart seems to contradict the table and to be way off for the "Other" category ("1%"). It's at least 2.53%, and probably much more.  

message: Israel is often criticized for marginalizing the Palestinian population within the borders of Israel -- however the Palestinian population inside Israel continues to grow. Over the same time period what has happened to the Jewish populations in various Muslim-dominated countries? If Israel is guilty of a policy of apartheid toward Palestinians then there is also the question of what happened to the Jewish populations in various Muslim-dominated countries. How about about including columns for historical Jewish population values in the table? Galt57 (talk) 02:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Jewish Populations? 

message: Table notes: the year is missing, which renders the whole thing totally useless. Just notice the mention of Gaza: irrelevant after 2005. Arminden (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data is 100% useless w/o a date 

message: Curiously timed addition of "Palestine (2%)" has no accompanying reference, and my, admittedly, brief search of the web can find no such number/proof. It is possible that the Jewish population of Palestine was considered in that of Israel, which would make the new entry invalid, unless the corresponding (and alleged) 2% were subtracted from the Israel percentage, which I do not believe is the case. And, although the "Table" shows the newly added Palestine, the pie chart, above it, does not. Skaizun (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newly added Palestine unreferenced, not added to pie chart
Talk:Tony Buzan

message: There are certain very simple requirements of etiquette and good practice you may wish to familiarise yourself with. Sign your contributions, not from some anonymous terminal and 'on behalf of xyz organisation', whoever they may be. Provide references in the article so that the promotional material you have posted here may be independently checked, by those who wish to do so. You have evidently been a busy little bee monitoring this page, but if you continue to refuse to stick to these very simple and altogether not unreasonable courtesies, you make yourself look like a snake-oil salesman because you give the impression that you have something to hide, and surely that is the last thing you want. 
Another courtesy is not to blank the comments left by others, nor to post anonymously and then delete your own IP address. If you wish to post anonymously, sign in to Wikipedia. 
Neither the Tony Buzan organization nor 'Arnold' is making themselves look very good with this, so readers will draw their own conclusions.Sartoresartus (talk) 12:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia

message: This page reads like an advertisement, with buzzwords in bold.  It does not give the impression of an unbiased assessment at all.
88.96.79.118 (talk) 21:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have removed the bold. SunCreator (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold 

message: I removed the lengthy list of roles etc as it is far too detailed for an article about a fairly minor business man. Efficacious (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Much more appropriate now.Sartoresartus (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pruning the wild growth
Talk:Daleside Brewery

message: Well, The Simpsons' version has been split off. Somebody needs to clean up the mess. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 10:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The split 
Talk:Toyota Camry

message: Gonna leave these links here:
* https://www.autocarindia.com/car-news/toyota-camry-facelift-revealed-419257
* https://www.autocarindia.com/car-news/new-toyota-camry-india-bound-in-2019-409274
There are further search hits for relevant terms.
Samsara 02:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That tells us about India sales but says nothing about India production.  Stepho  talk  20:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  India production 

message: Does anybody know (and I mean really know, not just guessing) if the Camry being released in Nov 2023 is a face-lift or a new generation?
Same question for Nov 2024.
A face-lift will continue the XU70 model code. A new generation will have a new model code (presumably XU80 but Toyota do like to break their own pattern).
From recent press teases, I'm not quite clear if they are representing the the same vehicle release or teasing 2 separate releases a year apart.  Stepho  talk  06:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023/2024 facelifts vs new generations 

message: Anonymous users—who I suspect are sockpuppets of the same person, based on their awkward grammar—have repeatedly added information to the XV80 section about a a change.org petition that has, as I write this, gathered about 200 signatures (about one signature per 41 million residents of the planet, so it's not exactly a mass movement). Can we build consensus that this information is non-encyclopedic WP:CRUFT that is inappropriate to add to this article per WP:UGC and WP:NOTEVERYTHING? I can envision Wikipedia automotive articles drowning in trivial or puerile online petitions if this sort of thing is allowed to stand. Carguychris (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it is cruft. With such a small number of signatures compared to the cost of developing that engine to meet emission laws and the cost of certifying it (a non-trivial amount), Toyota is almost certainly going to ignore it.  Stepho  talk  22:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change.org petition
Talk:Ricardo Zonta

message: "On the final day of the Rolex Monterey Historic Automobile Races Presented by Toyota, Ricardo Zonta and the Panasonic Toyota Racing Team TF106 F1 car continued to lower the record for the 11-turn, 2.238 mile Laguna Seca Raceway. Sunday's record-breaking time was 1:06.309 at an average speed of 121.504 mph on lap four of four flying laps. Zonta, traveling on brand new tires for the first time this weekend, laid down four consistent laps for an average of 1:06.640. His Saturday best time was 1:06.596 and Friday's best time was 1:07.587. On all three days, Zonta beat the previous track record of 1:07.722 set by Helio Castroneves at the CART Honda Grand Prix of Monterey in 2000. Castroneves' speed was 118.969.  Despite the Toyota team and Zonta only doing demonstration laps for the fans, and not going flat-out to break the record, they still managed to do so.  It is estimated that, had they spent a proper test week prior to the event to get a proper set up for the track, had the right compound tires (they did not use the softest Bridgestone compound available, rather a medium compound), and gone full-bore for the track record, it is estimated that, with the TF106 that they used here, a time in the range of 1:04 would be possible, and, of course, a quicker time for a Ferrari 248F1 or Renault R26, as the Toyota TF106 is about 1-1.5 seconds slower than those two cars.  Either way, an F1 car is the fastest on that track, even after only doing demonstration laps."
It doesn't really have anything to do with Zonta and record has since been broken by a Champ Car anyway, so it's now factually incorrect. It also seems written from a very F1 biased view (see last sentance) and out of place for a bio of a driver anyway.
:I agree, although you'll find you get reverted less often if you use the edit summary box just below the editing window to explain your edits, especially if you delete large chunks of text. As a side note, not sure the last sentence is biased. F1 cars are faster than CART or IRL cars, other than on ovals: it's simply down to the different regulations, an F1 car is lighter, has about the same power, and can brake harder (carbon vs steel brakes). That doesn't make them 'better', the respective rules of the series just make them that way. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Toyota lap records
Talk:Donald Broadbent

message: I'd like more details on this citation. I have created a searchable PDF of William James (1890) book, Principles of Psychology.  I cannot see any phrases similar to a "multi-storage" or "multi-store" paradigm in James' book.  Can we get a more specific citation that includes an edition and a page number?  And perhaps the exact term used by James? Neurostudent (talk) 00:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attributing Broadbent's filter model to William James (1890)
Talk:Samāpatti

message: Seems to me, this article is more for a specific Indology-related, than for a general type encyclopedia. The entries left open are surely to fit the standards of a dictionary.
Should I remove it? Or start an Indopedia project?
I'm not sure about this article, but to do a bit of cleanup i added an image of a walking meditation and reordered a bit to fit a more article flow. Any more ideas on what can be done to this? (If not, I'll remove and cleanup tag soon) -- ∞Wirelain 05:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled