Talk:Iomega

message: The iomega.com links are all broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:FB1:C7:684E:A971:1C14:D8D2:7171 (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Iomega.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Iomega.png

message: Smells like marketing speak with little substance  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.191.129 (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Sometime in the late nineties, there was controversy about alleged stock manipulation through artificial hyping in Internet forums.
After a few quick Internet searches, I found no references, but I wish to remember
repeated mentions in either the Economist or Fortune, should someone wish to
search deeper.
94.220.250.76 (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further controversy 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Iomega.   (t · c) buidhe 11:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: LenovoEMC →  – Now that neither the company nor its products remain in existence, the name of the article should be the one the company was most known by.  And that is Iomega, used from 1980 to 2013 including the popular Iomega Zip drive.  The LenovoEMC name was only used from 2013 to 2018 during the tail end of the company's existence.  As evidence for which name is better known, raw web search hits for Iomega outnumber those for LenovoEMC by ten to one.  It would be nice if WP:NCCORP covered this kind of situation, but it does not, so I think general article titling considerations should apply. Wasted Time R (talk) 14:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 February 2021