lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Borough of Chorley

message: the 2011 census results have been reveale the population and ethnicy on this page needs to be updated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.28.18.84 (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  update 
Talk:Kalâm-e Saranjâm

message: The Kalam-e Saranjam is the main religious book of the Ahl-e Haqq and used by hundreds of thousands of people since the 15th century.  It is crucial there be an article about this very important book.--Persianhistory2008 12:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following comment was placed in the article itself. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 10:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved comment from article 

message: There was already a brief :Serencam article, which I have redirected to this one. The text was, "Serencam (also Saranjam) is the main religious book of the Yarsani Kurds which is in the Gorani dialect of the Kurdish language." I have noted the "serencam" spelling in this article. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no such a thing as "Serencam". I went through dozens of books about the Ahl-e Haqq. No such spelling, must have been a joke.--Persianhistory2008 (talk) 13:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, apparently the Kurdish language Wikipedia spells it that way (right or wrong), as the old "Serencam" article had the following interwiki link: :ku:Serencam. However, the Kurdish article is very brief, just one sentence. I wouldn't know how to go about bringing up the issue in Kurdish. The Persian interwiki is :fa:سرانجام, but I have no idea what that spelling would look like in English. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone must have made an error on the kurdish page. I also saw that page, but it has less than one sentence and it's not in the kurdish alphabet, so it would be very easy for them to screw it up.--Persianhistory2008 (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serencam
Talk:Christ Church Meadow, Oxford

message: The map doesn't seem well chosen to illustrate the location of the Meadow - it should show the Thames, surely! Danny Yee (talk) 21:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. No doubt it was an available map which happened to show part of Christ Church Meadow, but a map showing the whole thing would be far better. In the mean time, I'll tweak the caption. Moonraker2 (talk) 07:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  map could be improved 
Talk:Christchurch Harbour

message: I have done a major restructuring of the article so as to allow for future expansion.  The General Description section is a default for want of a better section header name.  I have simply copied to this the contents of the original article.  This needs work, since it duplicates some of the content I have written on the guided tour.
Please get involved and improve my rough outline.    Robert of Ramsor (talk) 12:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructuring (Jan 2009)

message: This 2.0m mean depth. Is that on a high spring during a flood? :)  --Ykraps (talk) 18:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth of harbour. 
Talk:Sulfur trioxide pyridine complex

message: "The compound strongly violates the octet rule, as sulfur here has 12 or 14 electrons in its valence shells, depending on whether the S-N bond is viewed as dative or not."
I have two issues with this. First, pyridine.SO3 violates the octet rule. As do H2SO4, H2SO3, SF6, POCl3, ClF3. The octet rule only holds strongly for second row elements, for the rest many exceptions exist. Not sure if it's worth mentioning here.
Second, the sulfur in pyridine.SO3 always has 12 valence electrons, no matter how you view it. At least that part of the sentence should likely be removed.
131.130.22.162 (talk) 13:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

message: This section is missing entirely. I would expect that it would need caution when handling, since it's used as a source of (very corrosive) SO3. Hellbus (talk) 01:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I just dont think that people use pySO3 on scale but as a reagent in fancy syntheses.  Hence the article is very brief on apps.  I also suspect that it isnt particular nasty since the strong Lewis acidity of SO3 is quenched.  Our article on SO3 has a blunt statement about dangers.--Smokefoot (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety?
Talk:Christmas Common

message: If anyone would like to write about the previous sculpture trail here with images and information as well as it's demise, including the suicide of someone from one of the sculptures, it would be much appreciated. It would also be nice to have some information about the plane wreckage which remains there. --Javindo (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sculpture trail and WWII plane crash site

message: Should the mention of distance (7 1/2 miles) be decimalised? The manual of style (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Numbers) suggests a general preference for decimals over fractions and it looks a bit odd. However it adds a vagueness that suits distances between towns. 
Pfbray (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 1/2 miles
Talk:Church Aston

message: I have excised the following:
Notable Residents:
Jack Blake - Party Animal
Cloptonson (talk) 13 December 2015
:To update, I have reinstated this section this year with the genuine names of Arthur Colegate and Bishop Iraj Mottahedeh, both sourced to biographical reference books.Cloptonson (talk) 14:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspected vandalism
Talk:Church End, Shalford

message: The only "Church End" in Essex seems to be the one neighbouring Ashdon. There is however a "Churchend" on the B1053 north of Baintree (just south of Shalford), and another "Chruchend" on the Northern edge of Great Donmow. I assume it's the one near Baintree that this article is supposed to refer to. -- Rjw62 (talk) 11:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?
Talk:All Saints' Church, Childwall

message: "The Church is used frequently by Channel 4 programme Hollyoaks as its Resident Catholic Church St. Timothys [1]" has been moved from the lead.  It needs a precise citation and would sit better in a new section (say Present use) rather than in the lead. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited edit
Talk:Stoke sub Hamdon Priory

message: According to a book I've recently acquired (Archeological Properties of the National Trust in Somerset, 1971) two of the provosts (Woulset - 1534-42) and his successor Carmar were both chaplains to Henry VIII is this worth adding? It also gives dates of 1473-1508 for a Provost Coorte. Still reading the rest of the section of the book on The Priory, where the author lived there 1968-9 during the restoration after NT purchase, and will add more info as I get to it.— Rod talk 21:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It can't harm! I'm still hoping to get back around to adding the architecture stuff to this article, but I've been putting it off because it really isn't my forte, and I've been super busy off-wiki. Harrias talk 18:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of Provosts
Talk:Churches Conservation Trust

message: Listed as one of 177 "Public bodies to be abolished" in a government list published in The Daily Telegraph today, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/8021780/Quango-cuts-full-list-of-bodies-under-review.html.  Not yet clear what precisely this will mean.  David Underdown (talk) 10:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it's a charity, but did not know it is a quango.  Will it become "just" a charity; will the government cease to provide part of its income; who knows?  I see from the same source that English Heritage is to be "merged or consolidated"; maybe CCT will become part of EH. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 12:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would seem reasonably logical, or at least just have government funding through EH rather than in its own right.  Needs monitoring for further announcements though, I don't think there's enough in today's list and accompanying article to really add anything to the article at the moment.  David Underdown (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't a quango, see here, so what is it doing on the "list"?--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone's messed up then.  Even more glad I didn't pile straight into the article.  David Underdown (talk) 15:22, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Quango or not, according to this list it is to be retained.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abolition? 

message: Not only is the CCT a Quango, but perhaps one of the most inept, bureaucratic and officious of all semi-official governmental sponsored institutions. I can provide, for anyone interested, a whole catalogue of mismanagement errors, prejudices and ineptitudes about this institution for overpaid and failed, civil servants, who neither conserve, or are to be trusted with the cultural heritage they inherited without merit, and perpetually mismanage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quango Norwikian (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The CCT is a Quango
Talk:Churston Ferrers

message: Grew up in Galmpton right next to the Grammar school, Churston is a village within the larger parish, and the parish is (or at least was) represented on the mayoral seal of Torbay to include both villages. Ideally there should be a separate page for Churston as there is for Galmpton, but there isn't enough currently for one page let alone two. MatGB (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are no statistics for population or area in the present article. They do give a picture of the place just as much as the buildings do. --Oldontarian (talk) 11:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Chute, Wiltshire

message: Does anybody know the meaning of this placename? Could it be connected with Norman-French common placename Tuit/LaThuit, meaning a clearing in a wooded area, and thus is etymologically related to the placename Thwaite? 188.141.10.11 (talk) 20:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Placename meaning?
Talk:City of Lancaster

message: I belive the correct form of introduction is simply "City of Lancaster" and not "The City of Lancaster". We don't say "The South Lakeland District" when referring to that local government area, so we shouldn't do so here. Any thoughts on this? I've set the article to omit the "The" for the moment. Blacklans (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Although we don't say The South Lakeland District, we do say The District of South Lakeland.  Similarly, we would say The City of Lancaster, but Lancaster City.  Down south they probably would say The South Lakeland District, but then they also say On the Oxford Road, which seems strange to northern ears used to simply on Oxford Road.  Skinsmoke (talk) 13:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" 

message: There is a discussion at :Category talk:Lancaster#Split category? about renaming or reorganising that category. -- Dr Greg  talk  23:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancaster category 

message: the 2011 census results have been revealed the population and ethnicy on this page needs to be updated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.30.226.2 (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  update 
Talk:Clarence Dock, Liverpool

message: Removed reference to Everton FC. There are no official plans for a stadium at he dock. The reference was to a supporters group at an inquiry, not the club, who had a plan B for a stadium at Clarence Dock.  Peel Holding have no plans for a stadium at the docks which is a part of the proposed Liverpool Waters, and neither have Everton FC.
The above was by user User:79.65.105.39.
:Clarence Dock wiki
Please could you look at the Clarence Dock wiki. In 2004 it was widely reported in the Liverpool Echo and Daily post as well as numerous Everton FC websites and fanzines, that there was a proposal for a shared stadium for EFC/LFC at Clarence Docks. This was proposed by the Mersey Docks and Harbour Company and was backed by the NWDA who pushed hard for it at the time. World renowned stadium architects KPMG (currently advising Liverpool FC on their ground move) were commisioned to draw up masterplan pitcures, showing how the stadium would be sited.
I have added this proposal, as a historical proposal for the Clarence Dock site of interest to many people. I have added links to the KPMG masterplan pictures and (as per requests) have added a link to a story relating to this by Bill Gleeson Editor of the Liverpool Daily Post.
An individual called John who is banned from multiple local websites and forums (from KEIOC to skyscrapercity Liverpool to the Echo website forums) has deleted this work and continues to threaten to delete it.
I have added links and even the architects drawings and would appreciate some help in ensureing that my work, which is a historical proposal for the site of great interest to many people, is not deleted in future by this known site vandal and nuisance.
Thank you 86.137.75.132 (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly I'm not banned from any of those sites. Secondly didn't revert this article. I suggest you check the references and the decided whether to delete it or not but there are no claims about railways that I can find anywhere. The diagram a station on the Mersyerail Northern Line. This IP address is in Wigan, I don't this the user has ever been down the dock road or knows the geography of Liverpool at all.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Your talking rubbish. Check user rights please check this out. I don't think he liked that I point out he's Wigan and suggested he supports Evertone.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stadium
Talk:HMS Wellesley (1815)

message: I doubt that the length of the keel is "1,145 ft 11 1⁄2 in (349.3 m)". --Proofreader (talk) 17:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now corrected. --Proofreader (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keel length
Talk:Clearwell Caves

message: I've cleaned up this section so it's got much less wide-eyed credulity. Personally I think it's a pile of bunkum but I've left it in for now. 124.184.107.122 (talk) 06:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly I think it should be taken out. It distracts from the main article, there's no references, the one link is broken and the "orbs" nonsense has long been de-bunked. Unless anyone can think of a good reason to keep it in?Nedtrifle (talk) 12:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't reasonable to say that such things have been seen, but it's perfectly encylopaedic to say that people have claimed to have seen such things. As long as the claims are supported by citations, I see no reason to remove them. Obscurasky (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I have no problem with it being mentioned but it seems like there's too much in the article at the moment. I've had a go at cutting it down to a bare minimum (which at least has a reference - albeit a poor one)Nedtrifle (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Paranormal activity
Talk:Cleator

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Cleeve Lock

message: shouldn't there be something on this page about it being the smallest fall of any lock on the thames?
Petsco (talk) 10:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if you check para 2 you will see that there is, but thanks for the interest.Motmit (talk) 11:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall? 
Talk:List of deputy prime ministers of Turkey

message: I feel that the title should be moved to Vice Prime minister. I think vice refers to a post in the cabinet and deputy refers to person who acts as the prime minister in the absence of the latter. I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it is good like this. In Turkey there can be more than one Deputy Prime Minister but I believe there can only be 1 Vice President (USA). In Turkish it is called the Başbakan yardımcısı. This literally translates to (Prime Minister Helper) in other words Assistant Prime Minister. But i think the widely used term for this in english is deputy prime minister or prime ministers deputy.--Ötüken 2 (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sock. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vice vs deputy
Talk:Clifton, Cumbria

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Bugatti Type 46

message: Ettore Bugatti is sometimes cited with this expression, but not for the T46, but for the more modern Bugatti Type 57, the first project of his son Jean. The T57 was planned initially with an independent front axle like Buick, but Ettore stopped that in favor of a redesign of his own rigid axle.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Molsheim Buick"
Talk:Bugatti 8-cylinder line

message: I would have expect to find an explanation about the term 8-cylinder line here in this article, knowing very well that the Type-40 was powered by a natural aspirated inline-four (not 8, three-valve by the way). --87.147.177.11 (talk) 07:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  – '''8'''-cylinder line – ?
Talk:Climping

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish (Climping) should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest villages within the parish (Atherington, West Sussex) to be merged and redirected to Climping. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This article uses the spellings "Clymping" and "Climping" interchangeably. Are both used locally? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, both are used. For example, the parish council (as "Clymping Parish Council"), the parish church (sometimes as "St Mary at Clymping"), and the local magazine ("Clymping Village News") all prefer the "y" form. But in many other contexts, "Climping" is used. I would myself prefer the "i" form. And I think it is a sound choice for the article name. But it is, unfortunately, not easy to impose what would be a desirable consistency on the article without ignoring the choices made by local organisations in respect of their own names. PaulBetteridge (talk) 10:11, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Bugatti Type 53

message: "The Type 53 is said to have not used universal joints, and steering difficulty was legendary. Jean Bugatti even crashed a Type 53 at Shelsley Walsh in June, 1932. Modern tests, however, have shown the car to be quite tractable at speed, and Bugatti's drawings for the Type 53 do show "Tracta" u-joints fitted in front."
There are a lot more ceditable sources than you saying otherwise.  Why don't you try and prove it?  Bugatti's own twin-engined designs never came to fruition and most were most-likely two wheel drive anyway.  The only twin engined FWD of the 1920s and 30s was the JAP Fuzzi.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.64.123 (talk) 22:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bugatti Type 52

message: Bugatti Type 52 vs. Bugatti Baby
The article contends that "The number 52 was probably given by the late Hugh Conway and was never used by the factory. The factory always referred the car as Baby."
If the car wasn't actually called the Bugatti Type 52, but rather the Bugatti Baby, it seems to me this article should be renamed. As of right now we have an article with an incorrect colloquial name for which no history is even certain, and no article at all if you search for the correct name of the car. - 98.40.77.96 (talk) 02:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Osmolagnia

message: Merge Olfactophilia and Osmolagnia. The two articles are practically identical and function only as synonyms for each other as far as I can see. --M.A. 12:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 19:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Clipstone

message: I've moved some general background material from King John's Palace. Please see the history of that page for the contributing editors. Hchc2009 (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material from King John's Palace... 
Talk:N-Formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine

message: Joflaher (talk) 16:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is about a peptide and formyl peptide receptors is about a family of receptors.  They are clearly related but distinctly different subjects each deserving its own article.  I would be strongly oppose merging these two articles.  Boghog (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:NFKB2

message: For example, if I'm reading this correctly, "p105 → p50" is listed as another name for NF-κB1, but 'NF-κB1' is a noun whereas 'p105 → p50' seems to be the assertion that p50 is generated from p105. I don't know how an assertion can be another name for a noun. The alias should be p50, not p105 → p50.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Page Notes (talk • contribs) 00:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The Table in the  Members section doesn't make sense
Talk:Clungunford

message: In the Parish History section of your article, you state that Clungunford became part of Ludlow Rural District in 1894. This differs from information in A Vision of Britain through Time and also as shown on the Ordnance Survey Map of Shropshire, both 1900 and 1931 editions. Both of these state that Clungunford was in Clun Rural District (followed by Clun and Bishop's Castle Rural District in 1967).
Could you check your information, please. --Oldontarian (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rural district for Clungunford