Talk:Marie-Thérèse, Duchess of Angoulême

message: This page has some inconsistent citation styles, so I am editing to a single style based on the guidelines at WP: Citing sources.
Best, Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 21:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation styles

message: I greatly sympathize with the French people before and during the revolution. But at the same time I also equally sympathize for the French Royal Family. They were born into the same world as the rest of France and Europe with the same codes applying. They may have been in a much nicer position, but they were still bound by the same traditional order. King Louis XVI was misguided and alone his whole life with no one to turn to, at least until Marie Antoinette arrived, and still neither of them had really been taught anything on how to run a country. It is true that Marie Antoinette was very immature when she first arrived in France, but after she became a mother she settled down and became more sympathetic to the French people. However, she didn’t know how to help them, and neither did King Louis XVI. Their court constantly put pressure on them and ultimately was much stronger than the royal family. You also must remember that the France he was born into and she arrived into, was not of their making. The dept left by Louis XIV and the almost completely ignoring of the country by Louis XV made it almost impossible for them to fix anything. I will admit that they did make many mistakes, but they also at least tried to make up for it in some ways. But in the end they were just people who were caught up in the same dangerous misfortune and revolution as the rest of the country. And because of whom they were, people were even more biased against them, making the revolution even harder for them in some cases. It's amazing that Marie Therese Charlotte survived, especially when you look at what the great revolution did to her brother. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DukeDarrickofDrugarcio (talk • contribs) 17:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All history is biased. 

message: This article needs to have some balance, with modern sources.72.80.111.132 (talk) 17:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved - included several citations of Marie-Therese: The Fate of Marie Antoinette's Daughter by Susan Nagel (originally pub. 2008, cited edition 2009). This brought about the addition of a whole new paragraph and a bit more, but I'll reference to it on currently-standing bits of information. Kfodderst (talk) 07:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Sources Required 

message: Maybe the article should be changed to Marie-Thérèse-Charlotte, Dauphine of France-Croix129  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.56.169 (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: I changed the title of the article to Marie-Thérèse Charlotte de France because *de France* is/was the surname of the kings of France & of their direct descendants; accordingly, as the daughter of Louis XVI of France, her name is Marie-Thérèse Charlotte de France.  Also, hyphen only between her first two first names: Marie-Thérèse.  Frania W. (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name of Marie-Thérèse Charlotte

message: These few incidents should be included into this article. Some references to aid writing a section for this: The Dark Count by Ludwig Bechstein, The Mystery of Hildburghausen by Brachvogel and Nevtelen Var (The Nameless Castle in English) by Jokai Mor for purporting the theory; in contrast, and a nice summary/overview, which dismantles the theory rather effectively, was done by Sophie Nagel in her book on Marie-Therese, Marie-Therese: The Fate of Marie Antoinette's Daughter. The inclusion should be done as soon as possible. I will be able to contribute as well, but maybe not immediately. If anyone has anymore references/sources or information, please mention them here so they can be included into the article. Kfodderst (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hildburghausen and Castle Eishausen Theories 

message: Substituted at 21:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Please see this edit where I removed a text fragment that didn't make sense. It looks to be part of an image caption for an image which is not included here. See the main image at Victoire de Rohan. The baby in that picture is Marie Thérèse of France, sitting in the lap of Victoire de Rohan. Opinions may differ whether that drawing is well-suited here. EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another image is available, but may not be needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marie Thérèse of France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050428002828/http://www.royaltymonarchy.com/opinion/articles/russell.html to http://www.royaltymonarchy.com/opinion/articles/russell.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified