Talk:Criminal psychology

message: I would like to suggest this article be flagged as having multiple problems:
* Copy editing needed:  Sentence structure and clarity, Grammar.
* Lead Section:  Needs improvement- current definition may not emphasise key attributes of the topic or the most relevant main disciplinary links (Anthropological_criminology?  Really?  This seems to be a pointed criticism, rather than a helpful linking to other disciplines-  Why not just say that Criminal Psychology is a social darwinist tool of the ruling elite and be done with it?  ;) )
* Scope:  As per the comments section below.  Over emphasis of Criminal Profiling which is covered elsewhere, neglect of other areas (including theoretical developments), little on modern practice (total neglect of risk assessment, intervention design and delivery, contributions to correctional and rehabilitative systems).  This may be a result of US bias.
* Importance of the article.  Should be raised in importance.  I would argue, in line with the comment below (13 May 2013) that this article discusses a broad area of research and applied practice, and includes areas such as Forensic Psychology which is much better represented by its article and considered of higher importance by the Psychology Project.
I am able to make some of these contributions.  
Anterelic (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Problems

message: Article can use a lot (!) of expansion. As it is, it is way overfocused on Michel Foucault. Not that he doesn't have some importance to the subject. --DanielCD 07:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of Article

message: And merge that page with Forensic psychology--Ziji 07:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I understand correctly, you are saying merge criminal psychology and forensic psychology? Would it make sense then if an article was made that was an umbrella article for all psychology practices in law enforcement and justice systems as an option for your merger idea? AllieJoGlanzer (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Criminal psychology 

message: This article is quite turstworthy, somewhat biased, a little complete, somewhat well-written,and quite accurate. More information from references. Needs some wording changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.17.199 (talk) 22:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: These edits  appear to take content from this book . Wondering if there is someone who could verify? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I did text string matches throughout and kept coming back to that book. No doubt you found the source. ;/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy and paste

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://books.google.com/books?id=FkMuAQAAIAAJ&q=Constructive+Therapy+has+emerged+as+a+viable,+rapidly+growing+approach+across+a+wide+area+of+cognitive+therapies.&dq=Constructive+Therapy+has+emerged+as+a+viable,+rapidly+growing+approach+across+a+wide+area+of+cognitive+therapies.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=oL6GUc2TNILE9gSpmIHgAQ&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This page seems to include quite a bit of unsourced material that comes from this https://www.theguardian.com/g2/story/0,3604,404994,00.html Steven Morris article from the Graun. A word or two is snipped here and there, but aside from that it’s the same. The Guardian doesn’t strike me as the most reliable source for information on the origins of this subfield, and it isn’t cited at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.110.219 (talk) 23:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant plagiarism  

message: — Assignment last updated by Jiaxiang Joao (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Psychology

message: — Assignment last updated by Hlivingston (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Writing

message: — Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 02:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: — Assignment last updated by St030302 (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Seminars in Forensic Science

message: — Assignment last updated by DoctorBeee (talk) 19:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 102 Section 4