lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Synthetic mode

message: I changed "are derived" to "can be derived." Seeing as how the various modes predate the major/minor scales, it is like saying a horse-drawn carriage is derived from the car... I'm still not fond of the wording, even after my edit. I might come back and revisit it and try to find a way to make it more clear. Jmclark (talk) 10:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: I am personally a little confused on the difference between a synthetic scale and mode. Would this article benefit if an explanation were added in the introduction comparing/contrasting synthetic modes to synthetic scales?----Awelotta (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between synthetic mode and synthetic scale 

message: Hello-
I'm citing this page for a monograph article that I'm writing about synthetic harmony, and could I please cite the individual author of this beneficial article?
Thanks-
Michael Galganski 4321MG (talk) 16:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia articles almost never have a single author: we're a collectively edited encyclopedia. There's a guide to citing Wikipedia at this page but note carefully what it says at the top: we are not, and have never pretended to be, a reliable source. For all academic, and almost all other purposes, a citation to Wikipedia is inappropriate. — Trey Maturin™ 16:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Tacet

message: Why do we have both a Rest article and a Tacet article if a tacet is simply a rest? Jojalozzo (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose "Tacet" could be merged into "Rest (music)". If you want to pursue this, I suggest you mention this at Talk:Rest (music) – that page seems to be more active than this one. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Rest article
Talk:Tertian

message: *In music or music theory, tertian is the quality of a chord (2 or more notes [tones]) constructed in thirds. The spelling of thirds is reckoned from every other letter used in referencing pitches named A through G. In examples : the array of pitches (... A, B, C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C ...) : A up to C, B up to D, E down to C, F down to D (etc.).  There is an intermediary pitch between all adjacent letter names with the exceptions of E-F and B-C.  The use of accidentals (sharp [#], double-sharp, flat [b], double-flat [bb], natural, double natural) reference tones with respect to proper spelling.  A third may be either major (4 semitones), minor (3 semitones), diminished (2 semitones), or augmented (5 semitones). Examples: the interval C-E is a major third, because it encompasses 4 semitones (C-Db, Db-D, D-Eb, Eb-E); the interval A-C is a minor third, because it encompasses 3 semitones (A-Bb, Bb-B, B-C); the interval A-Cb is a diminished third, because it encompasses 2 semitones (A-Bb, Bb-Cb); and the interval C-E# is an augmented third, because it encompasses 5 semitones (C-Db, Db-D, D-Eb, Eb-E, E-E#).  The tones of a chord may be sounded simultaneously (harmonically), in sequence (melodically), or a mixture of both.
Although this is a longer paragraph, it is comprehensively more accurate. Edward Palamar (talk) 03:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this more accurate than the version () at that time? Hyacinth (talk) 14:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It includes all possible variants of the type of third. Prophet of the Most High (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st paragraph 

message: The caption for this sound byte is poorly written, and since there is no clear connection between it and the text it should be re-worked/explained, or else deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.6.206 (talk) 07:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Hyacinth (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thirteenth chord on A equals quartal chord on B♭"
Talk:Through-composed music

message: So, does this only refer to classical music? --...Wikiwøw. 23:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 02:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: Reverting change that removed contemporary examples.  Through-composed is not only a concept that applies only to classical or historical music, so examples of 20th/21st century contemporary music are surely appropriate.  I do think however that the wording of restored paragraph is in elegant. 
Earlducaine (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Trichord

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 12:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See the "citation needed" and "page needed" tags.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: Is the second sentence "A trichord is a contiguous three-note set from a musical scale ..." intended to complement, offer a different view to, or contradict the first sentence "group of three different pitch classes found within a larger group." Or are they showing different contexts for the term trichord? Awelotta (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two definitions for trichord
Talk:Universal key

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, perhaps some citations indicating that this term is in fact used somewhere in some field of music theory would be a good place to start. A quick Google scholar search with the obvious keywords is not particularly promising.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.178.61 (talk) 05:15, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Vivace (disambiguation)

message: Should there be examples here or something? Because that's what I was looking for. I don't know any, otherwise I'd add them. =| 67.185.232.36 (talk) 06:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: The following sentence appears in the "vivace" stub:
"The speed typically coincides with that of "Molto Allegro" and implies a metronome marking of 132-160 if played 4 notes to a beat."
A metronome marking of what?=132-160? Four notes of what duration to a beat? Is 132 to 160 per minute the rate of repeat of the beats, or of some notes comprising a beat? As it stands, the statement means nothing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnOFL (talk • contribs) 00:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify, please-
Talk:Yo scale

message: For something I didn't believe existed this article has improved quite a bit. Hyacinth (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement

message: This article states that the Yo scale is not used in gagaku music, while the gagaku article states that it is. I'm assuming one or the other is wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.83.100.27 (talk) 23:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm adding a contradiction template about this. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Notice that the assertion in this article is uncited while the contradictory assertion in the gagaku article is cited. Hyacinth (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Also referenced in pentatonic scale. Hyacinth (talk) 04:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: The text says the yo scale in D is D-E-G-A-B, but the second picture shows D-E-G-A-C. Which is right? --108.206.7.65 (talk) 22:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that you didn't look at the right side of the second picture or at the notes in parentheses in the first picture. Hyacinth (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

text: It's confusing because the article says, "It is defined by ascending intervals of two, three, two, two, and three semitones." To me this implies that those are the notes of the ascending scale; however, I think it was actually intended simply to mean that the intervals were being listed in ascending order. I don't want to edit it though because I don't really know anything about the scale, so I might be wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.141.69.177 (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem 

message: "The yo scale, which does not contain minor notes..." There is no such thing as a "minor note", but there are "minor intervals". I was going to edit to reflect this, but reverted when I realised that there are minor intervals in the scale. Would people be happy with: "...does not contain a minor third interval up from the root/tonic note"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hundovir (talk • contribs) 12:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Minor notes" 

message: "The in scale is described as while the yo scale is described as 'bright' sounding."
in is described as what? 2A01:E0A:5B0:D050:F4F9:34FF:FEAC:6411 (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing word in introduction
Talk:Amatory

message: It's worth noting for future visitors/editors that the deletion discussion result was not a firm "keep" at all. In truth, it is still a very iffy subject. It looks as though they may, just by the skin of their teeth, meet the wikipedia criteria for notability, but only just. I'll let it go and not pursue it further, but it's something to note for future, and as it stands the article still needs hefty work. Prophaniti (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion 
Talk:B.V.S.M.P.

message: The article refers to "a worldwide hit in the summer of 1988". Given that the hit was worldwide, it seems somewhat parochial to refer to the period as summer, when only one hemisphere of the world was in summer. This should be edited to reflect the fact the world is a globe, not a single hemisphere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.231.32 (talk) 02:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parochial reference 
Talk:Band from TV

message: The band members listed on here are not the same as the ones listed on the Official Site, .  Shouldn't they be the same? -Mang0es (talk) 11:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Members
Talk:Bluesology

message: I have no understanding of wikipedia 'talk page guidelines' etc. or time to learn right now.
This page should have a link for disambiguation with the song 'Bluesology' by Milt Jackson, originally performed by the Modern Jazz Quartet and later covered by many artists.
It is probably the inspiration for the name of the band of which this page is about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vonuan (talk • contribs) 05:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sat with Fred Gandy right now, Freddie Creasey is him, he was just misnamed in a picture. So thse two are the asme person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.181.79 (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks.  If anyone queries the correction, I'll refer them here. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fred Gandy

message: https://books.google.com/books?id=A1ScAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA333&lpg=PA333&dq=elton+john+bluesology+1962&source=bl&ots=oPpeoUQApe&sig=tUcbui4fqw-Zunw1LkrT_SfHSEA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwikyqXWtejSAhVCzVQKHVvnDTsQ6AEIRzAG#v=onepage&q=elton%20john%20bluesology%201962&f=false
This book's copyright date coincides exactly with the date the History section was expanded in this article. Krychek (talk) 20:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That "book" seems to be largely comprised of Wikipedia articles - see WP:MIRROR.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism?
Talk:Boom Shaka

message: *Removal of a Potentially Damaging DOMAIN-URL:
*Malware Domain: (EXPLOIT)
*hxxp://www.williambowles.info/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/3f4dbe1047dacde8cdeb4d3f98ad3d611d1b1404cc0c7887610f32efd38d61e1/analysis/1373283876/
*Threat: JS/Exploit-Blacole.cw
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/724f5a794caab0893a48f5bc50294ccce3d99233f48be01c4202b1db43fc531a/analysis/1373306179/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/d38be604ab749776f818d100003de7d36a28a051db6b579387e404b6744b35a6/analysis/1373305674/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/eeab3b96c3fb7c420749ec3cc5788326150dcf631de7961b48991a945239d2be/analysis/1373305763/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/712b06fc8641c685f89a50512f6d62ee6d64a3b9426350f783f6865e665ea253/analysis/1373305770/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/63fab5670a5b1c0b11f21f752835d5ca0c2efdeac5a025239d2d8ff23360b3cf/analysis/1373306001/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/172c12f0e56e8875896f459202c94b1c74557b3ec3621285fd15e6aaa57e3551/analysis/1373306095/
*REFERENCE: http://jsunpack.jeek.org/?report=a40619186e3f1c962744b1738c06e427ce47fc52
*SEE ALSO: http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.williambowles.info
*3 HIDDEN LINKS FOUND: http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.williambowles.info
--Gary Dee 18:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware Link Removal
Talk:Burial Chamber Trio

message: Two anonymous users have vandalized this page today. That's ridiculous. That's really more than usual. Mike O'Malley has nothing to do with this band, despite one of the members sharing a last name with him. The Spin Doctors don't have anything to do with Burial Chamber Trio, either. This is ridiculous. This page has been vandalized two different times today, and that's higher than usual on all the pages that I watch. Whoever is vandalizing this page, please stop. Mike O'Malley and Spin Doctors have nothing to do with Burial Chamber Trio. Later, wikipedians. BTC 00:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oy, vey. This is stupid. 

message: I had meant to donate to the deletion discussion, but I had not come around to doing so. With that said, I agree with the sentiment that it should be kept, due to the involvement of the band members with Wikipedia articles. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 02:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion 
Talk:Chanson (band)

message: I edited few smaller things on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Jamerson - see: 
edit on 23:04, 7 August 2010 "fixed name wrong spelling, set link: see set link for relation or: www.philbrodieband.com/muso_james_jr.htm , minor edit: fixed space mark and missing bracket". 
It might be self-evident in such a case, but after linking a Red Link appeared on this article here. 
In the above mentioned article, under "Post-Motown career" at the end, a person - a son of that articles protagonist - is mentioned ("James Jamerson jr.") whose name spelling i first corrected and then linked to this site here - 
for that very person founded this "Chanson" group and has therefore been righteously mentioned in this article already. 
This musician does not have an article of his own yet, hence the link to the only existing site of his work. 
As far as i understood, such linking to extend existing relations between persons in Wikipedia is correct? 
In such case - is it basically ok to have a Red Link at all, or is there any way to avoid this 'issue' while not creating a whole new entry for this person, maybe by removing the (red)link from the second entry or something? 
Or am i completely wrong and must not link at all? 
thanks! 
--MajorHealey (talk) 00:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Link for James Jamerson jr. (or others) - ok or to avoid?
Talk:Darker My Love

message: I wouldn't consider Darker My Love a psychedelic rock band, I would consider a mixture of psychedelic rock and hard rock. Any suggestions? --Xjs. (talk) 23:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychedelic Rock? 

message: Both album page links redirect to the wiki site for the bands second album "2".
--80.138.229.252 (talk) 12:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums =
Talk:Lord Lieutenant of Cornwall

message: In Lieutenancies of Counties, 1585–1642, p. 14: "It was associated with the office of Warden of the Stannaries from 1587", and this seems to be true until 1705, when the 1st Earl of Godolphin was appointed Lord Lieutenant, while his son was appointed Warden. ネイ (talk) 04:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warden of the Stannaries
Talk:Hampartsoum Boyadjian

message: I deleted some addings (and a photo) by user:Seemsclose related to Sebastatsi Murad who was a different person and really died in Baku 3 years later than Medzn Murad. Andranikpasha (talk) 22:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved some info on Murad of Sebastia to the separate article. Andranikpasha (talk) 00:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Murads
Talk:Disco-Tex and the Sex-O-Lettes

message: By "name checked" can we assume the writer is making an inarticulate yet trendy attempt at informing the reader that the name of the band was mentioned in the lyrics of another song? Why not just use standard English in place of cutting-edge teen babble?  A real encyclopedia would have an editorial board ensuring a minimally acceptable standard of language for every entry. Wekepedia struggles to maintain a very low consistency. Yet another reason why Wikipedia is not a real encyclopedia. -- 02:46, 10 March 2012‎ 76.254.69.101
:I think it's more entertainment jargon (Stix Nix Hix Pix) rather than "teen babble"... AnonMoos (talk) 05:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Checked? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/disco-tex-and-the-sex-o-lettes-mn0001202301/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:FinePix S5 Pro

message: I'm also editing the resolution specs, which appear to have been accidentally copied from the Nikon D200 specs.
- Razor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.155.106 (talk) 04:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution information incorrect. 

message: Nothing else to say =P
- Razor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.155.106 (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding information regarding UV/IR version of camera

message: Fixed another copy-and-paste from the D200 article. When I have enough time I may just rewrite the whole thing =P
- Razor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.155.106 (talk) 16:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified sensor information 

message: See above ;)
- Razor
: But apart from that, it's pretty slick, eh? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added See Also Section
Talk:High Sheriff of Derbyshire

message: This article is improving well, it was only a little stub last year. Not only that but it is identifying the major players in Derbyshire history. Victuallers (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I've been pointing out in various places - if you look at High Sheriff of Cheshire I've found the London Gazette announcements of appointments for virtually every year back to 1840 (plus 1834), so these can be used to fill out the names across all the shrievalties (except Cornwall, and those in the gift of the Duchy of Lancaster which are of course announced separately).  To find more, just go to http://www.gazettes-online.co.uk/AdvancedSearch.aspx?geotype=London enter sheriffs and use the dates to restrict your search, going from January to May of a given year usually seems to reduce the hits to manageable proportions.  David Underdown (talk) 12:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Should this article not describe what the "High Sheriff of Derbyshire" is as part of the lead section/header or be renamed to" List of former High Sherriffs of Derbyshire" and have an article actualy on the post of the High Sheriff in Derbyshire with the history ? - Just a thought as its a bit ambiguas as i folled a link expecting to find out about the role and not a list of past ocupants of the post. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the duties don't vary that much from county to county, so High Sheriff is probably your best bet for that. It would be nice to discuss, on each "High Sheriff of X" article, notable achievements by the incumbents (calling out the posse against Jacobites, etc.), but that's hard to do right now, simply because the lists are most complete during the periods when the Sheriffs had minimal duties. Choess (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a summary of the article and  then at the top of the page of each ? - BulldozerD11 (talk) 23:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A numbe rof the county articles do have a more-or-less standard intro, with a link to High Sheriff, take a look round some of the other articles usign the navbox, and you'll get an idea of the other approaches that have been taken. David Underdown (talk) 10:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Title ? / Intro 

message: this link to another Wikipedia Page for Anthony Babington is not the same Anthony Babington who was the Sheriff in 1534-1534.
the Anthony Babington the link goes to was born in 1561 & died in 1586 - his ancestor was the Sheriff
I know this, because they were both my ancestors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissie1710 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthony Babington 1534-1535
Talk:Vice-Admiral of Devon

message: Not sure how to assess lists within the scope of WPMILHIST, but this one seems pretty raw, anyway. -- Avocado 01:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could someone more familiar with this topic determine if the John Harris referred to for 1638-1642 is supposed to be John Harris (Royalist), or some other John Harris? Thanks. KConWiki (talk) 22:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, looking closer, I see there are several links here that need to be disambiguated. I will try to work through them and leave notes on any that I cannot disambiguate here. KConWiki (talk) 22:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig of John Harris?

message: Per official sources from the RN, Navy List, the title was a command position listed under "Admirals of the coast of Great Britain sources also list" the title as "Vice Admiral of the coast of" have added military command info box in line with other RN fleet and command articles.--Navops47 (talk) 05:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article
Talk:Lord-Lieutenant of Greater London

message: Shouldn't the plural of "lord lieutenant" be "lords lieutenant" rather than "lord lieutenants"? -- Arwel (talk) 22:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plural
Talk:Lord Lieutenant of the City of London

message: Is  an appropriate link?
And there is information on page 3 of this pdf on the Lieutenancies Act 1997.
Should this page be renamed 'Commissioners of lieutenancy for the City of London' (as per the Act)? Jackiespeel (talk) 13:05, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant websites
Talk:Genticorum

message: --Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help us improve unsourced articles 

message: As of 2021, I think the band members are living in Waterville, Quebec, about 150 km from Montreal. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Town of residence