Talk:Jewish Legion

message: There was no such notion as "The Land of Israel" in World War I.
Also the use of the word "liberate" sounds more like Jewish propaganda than historical truth. I will change in to "conquer".
66.42.54.22 23:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: no such notion as "The Land of Israel" in World War I Well, sort of. There certainly was to the Zionists, which is who the article is really about. But yes, for accuracy's sake, your edits are appropriate, though FYI, Israel isn't the first place where liberation & conquest have been two sides of the same coin. ShalomShlomo 20:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Israeli State didn't exist, but there most certainly was such a notion as the "Land of Israel". Eretz Israel. It's refered to in both Jabotinsky and Trumpeldor's letters and publications. In the context of the paragraph, however, Palestine works. As for liberating, it's perfectly appropriate in the context, just as much so as conquering. 
AllenHansen (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am rather surprised that there is no refernce, or article, regarding this medal devised in part to honor Jabotinsky; the medal is apparently administered and/or awarded by the state of Israel.
:Is anyone interested in developing this subject? I do not know if the medal has another, official name; but the above is at least the popular name. One of its recepients, whom I happen to have known personally, was the international jurist, Paul S. Riebenfeld.
::Yours truly, Ludvikus 16:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "[[Jabotinsky Medal]]"

message: Overall, seems a bit short, but then, it's not the largest/broadest of topics. As far as I'm aware, it seems largely complete - no glaring omissions, but then I'm no expert on the subject. Lots of pictures, etc, is very nice, and lots of references. Could use a little work, I'm sure, as all things can, but overall a very nice start. LordAmeth 20:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: I am surprised you didn't mention leutenant -colonel Eliezer Margolin which was a revered jewish commander in the jewish legion and the commander of the 39 royal fusilliers battalion.
He was dismissed by the british after the arab riots of may 1921 because he went to tel aviv with his soldiers to stop the riots without taking permission from the military authorities.
87.68.50.26 18:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  leutanant-colonel eliezer margolin 

message: Reading this article, it seems that there was no distinct "Jewish regiment"; The Zion Mule corps was a small unit (a Colonial Corps) and the Jewish Battalions were part of a pre-existing regiment, the Royal Fusiliers. Better to replace any references to "Jewish regiment(s)" with units/battalions?
Ned de Rotelande 07:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology - "Jewish regiment(s)"

message: While I haven't done in-depth research on the subject, personal knowledge suggests that there are some problems with the article:
# It mentions 'volunteers from the 38th Battalion' - AFAIK, most of the 38th Battalions were actually British Jews drafted into the army, and not volunteers.
# There is no clear separation in the article between the early Zion Mule Corps which participated in Gallipoli, and the later units (38th, 39th and 40th). These were completely different and loosely-related units - the leaders were the same, and some volunteers from the ZMC proceeded into the other battalions, but the bulk of the later units was made of unrelated volunteers, who were mostly riflemen and not logistics personnel.
-- Ynhockey (Talk) 15:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible problems 

message: I have removed about half of the list because there are no clear criteria for inclusion, and while some members were clearly notable, some of the others were clearly not. I believe that either having a Wikipedia article should be the main criterion, or if someone decides to take a serious attempt to improve the article, new criteria need to be discussed here. —Ynhockey (Talk) 22:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of notable members 

message: Would it be correct to say that 'Jewish Legion' is a convenient, but unofficial, name for the battalions of the Royal Fusiliers which eventually became officially known as the Judean Regiment after the end of the Palestine campaign? If so, when and how did that label come to be used?       ←   ZScarpia   20:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be correct.  It was a very common popular name.  For example, NYT, Dec 28, 1918: "A complete list of the casualties of the Jewish Legion, officially known as the 38th and 39th Battalions, Royal British Fusiliers, ... shows that the forty-two men were killed and three wounded."  This book about the Fusiliers says "In August its formation was announced under the name of 'Jewish Regiment of Infantry'; but this description was subsequently withdrawn and the Jewish battalions became the 38th to 42nd Royal Fusiliers". Zerotalk 10:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Israel article cites the following as a source of information about the Legion: Schechtman, Joseph B. (2007). "Jewish Legion". Encyclopaedia Judaica 11. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA. p. 304. Retrieved 2014-08-06. That article is probably quoted verbatim by the Jewish Virtual Library: Jewish Legion. The article states that, after the successful completion of the Palestine campaign, the name of the battalions was changed to the Judean Regiment. Lieutenant Colonel John Henry Patterson, the commanding officer, quoted in other sources, refers to the Jewish Regiment.      ←   ZScarpia   03:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

text: The Jewish Magazine - Jerry Klinger - The Struggle for the Jewish Legion and The Birth of the IDF , October 2010: Additional material. Quotations from a 6 September 1917 letter by Colonel Patterson where he refers to 'the Jewish Regiment.' Reference to name change to 'the Judean Regiment': "After the defeat of the Ottoman, the Legion was granted the official name of Judean Regiment and the Menorah with the Hebrew word Kadima, meaning 'Forward' as well as 'Eastward,' became its badge."      ←   ZScarpia   00:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official or unofficial name? 

message: According to this source, the 41st RF (reserve) was deactivated and became the 40th RF (service)._"http://www.1914-1918.net/royalfus.htm"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.41.241.112 (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Fusiliers: 4 or 5 Jewish battalions? 

message: My Grandfather private Lewis Lewson joined the battalion. He was a tailor from London. He was with the Judeans from 1917 to September 1919.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.152.46 (talk) 18:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  38th Royal Fusiliers (Judeans) 

message: The article states, without sources, that the Legion took part in the Battle of Jerusalem. The Battle of Jerusalem took place in November and December 1917, the official surrender of the city taking place on the 9th of December. The article mentions that the Legion fought against the Ottoman army 20 miles north of Jerusalem in June of 1918, six months after the surrender of the city.       ←   ZScarpia   22:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopedia Judaica agrees. They arrived in Palestine in June 1918. Zerotalk 02:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jerusalem Battle of Jerusalem (1917)]