lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Performers of Christian music

message: WP needs a page to list Christian musicians who do not fall into the Contemporary Christian Music (CCM) category or historical or modern Gospel music.  There are acoustic guitar and country types of Christian music, and artists in those genres.  I've listed two (Dennis Agajanian and Fernando Ortega) who just don't easily fit into CCM or Gospel categories.  While they don't yet have WP articles written on them as yet, I believe they are deserving of such.  Thanks for your kind consideration of this.  --avnative 14:57, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
I noticed that someone added Michael Praetorius (early Baroque German composer) to this category.  While it is literally true that he was a Christian musician--I would be hard pressed to name a single European musician prior to about 1750 who wasn't--is this really what you have in mind for this category?  Or are you thinking more along the lines "contemporary Christian perfomers and songwriters in the field of popular music"?  If this is intended to be an all-encompassing category of all musicians who were Christians, this will include every classical music genre composer (and performer) from the first recorded composers of Gregorian chant up until about 1700, and then about 80% of them after that, maybe 1000 names.  Ideas anyone? Antandrus 17:45, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: More than a year later and it doesn't seem unmanageable. Maybe people have the good sense not to put any musician that just happens to be Christian. That said I think there are a few classical composers that would fit a category like this. Especially if they were near-exclusively known for non-Catholic Christian music. (As there is a :Category:Roman Catholic musicians)--T. Anthony 15:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree with Wavy 10. Will (Talk - contribs) 20:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See http://christianmusic.wikia.com.  We could use all the help you can provide. Will (Talk - contribs) 04:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedicated Christian Music Wiki available 

message: Not sure why Bryn is listed under B and not under H? Martinevans123 (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bryn Haworth]]
Talk:History of bus transport in Hong Kong

message: The following text was moved from the article page: olivier 15:10, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
:"The original author of this page does not have any connections with Mike Davis, which is a great author on the subject, nor any bus enthuaist pages. The original author put this is Wiki to share out knowledge to the masses."
----
Will there be any coverage on the residents' buses (邨巴)?
----
Will there be any coverage on the residents' buses (邨巴)?
----
Will there be any coverage on the residents' buses (邨巴)?
----
Will there be any coverage on residents' bus service (邨巴)?
To unnamed commentor:
Welcome to Wiki. Since Wiki is open to all to edit, you might work on it if you feel fit.
I myself would restraint from working on this seriously except on the part of Citybus, since there was nothing really significant on their part, except providing excellent express service and creating some chaos. If anyone could put in more in this area then I'll be happy to contribute --XF95．邪 13:13, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This may sound odd, but should we include bus companies' different willingness to employ female drivers over the years? This is not an attempt to make a feminist micro-history of buses: the refusal by CMB to employ female drivers had real effects. In the 1993 my husband's colleague was killed by a 70-year-old male driver who was no longer fit to drive, but had been brought out of retirement because of a shortage of drivers: CMB were declining to employ women. Meanwhile, Citybus were making newspaper headlines by employing a woman driver (first ever?).
I'll take this under advisement - if people think it's a daft thing to include, then clearly it shouldn't go in!  Cheers, JackyR 22:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus drivers - gender
Talk:Charles Greeley Abbot

message: Cut from article:
:The modern consensus is that, at least on short time scales of only a few decades, such variability does not occur, apart from tiny variations due to sunspots and faculae.
I am suspicious of any statement claiming a scientific consensus on anyone's research or theories. Better to say WHO agrees or disagrees. --Uncle Ed 15:23, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworded.  Modern measurements are much more accurate than the ones he made. -- Curps 20:32, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crandon, Wisconsin

message: Below is the history of the stub page that was located at Crandon, Wisconsin prior to my deleting it in order to move the article from Crandon (city), Wisconsin. older≠wiser 15:28, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Corn whiskey

message: "Georgia Moon" brand of corn whiskey is not aged and is clear.  It is an imitation of moonshine -- even the bottle looks like a Mason jar, and proclaimes "aged less than 30 days".  Judging from its appearance, it is likely that it has not been aged, at least in a barrel, at all.
Rlquall 15:50, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article said "not more than 40 percent by volume". I'm thinking that should
be not LESS than, as there exist 100 proof (50% volume) corn whiskeys (ie Virginia
Lightning). AnarchyElmo (talk) 03:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  > 80 proof 

message: Why is this article under "whiskey" but the Whisky article has no "e"?  Badagnani 00:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you’d read the Article you knew the reason …--92.229.83.24 (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: To conform with Wkistandards, this article needs to be changed to Maize Whiskey  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:881:200:F424:4C51:B825:4B7:8C5F (talk) 23:34, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia standards are to follow the sources. The name is "corn whiskey" by law. And WP:ENGVAR applies too. Change the name? Absolutely not. oknazevad (talk) 00:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: To be accurate, it is a screw-top jar, but not a Mason jar.  A Mason jar has a two-part lid-and-band closure suitable for home canning. 184.187.191.147 (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The jar is not a Mason jar
Template talk:Regions and administrative divisions of South Korea

message: Usually, in South Korean books, Web sites, etc., Seoul is listed first, then the metropolitan cities, then the provinces.  I've flipped the 3 categories around here so that they conform with the general order.  --Sewing 16:41, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been some controversy over this, but I think that we should keep the Seoul-first format. -- Visviva 09:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The short forms currently used here are the standard ones, two syllables for each province.  These (Chungbuk, Jeonnam, etc.) are the forms most commonly used, in both English and Korean; they also have the convenient feature of fitting more neatly into the box than would the full names.  -- Visviva 13:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Short forms
Talk:Jan Brzechwa

message: Are there any English translations of Brzechwa’s texts available anywhere? Rafał Pocztarski 17:34, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Birth date is 1898, see pl: article (mistake is explained inside). A.J. 13:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Benjamin Creme

message: Some mention of  appropriate? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paintings found 

message: In addition to the issue of the paintings recovery being added, I would suggest using the telegraph obit https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2016/11/11/benjamin-creme-artist-and-esotericist--obituary/ as the basis of some of this Wikipedia entry, as it is a neutral third-party article, and appears to be pretty balanced. There are too many references to Creme books, they should be reduced by a third or more. Mike.97301 (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements
Talk:Electric battery/to do

message: *Undergoing peer review.
It would be good to include this reference and accordingly update C-rate chapter. Please, if somebody thinks that this comment should go somewhere else, do so and replace it. The reference is: http://www.starkpower.com/highratedischarge.html. The description of C-rate seams confusing. It doesn't clearly state that for example at 2C discharge rate the battery would hold two times less.
:Dead website and may be spam. 121.98.204.148 (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Remove then. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 23:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Reaper Man

message: Is it known for sure that this novel (at least Death's parts) takes place in Lancre? When asked about an apothecary, Miss Flitworth responds by saying that "There's a witch over Lancre way." This would seem to imply that they are not in Lancre, but in a neighboring country, unless the citizens also refer to the castle town as "Lancre," which I suppose is possible. Chrismith 00:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not in Lancre, it's in the Octarine Grass Country. InsidiousTweevle 16:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location? 

message: The article could use a bit of help with the translations of the foreign titles. Aastrup 21:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations 

message: Wasn’t it her father who was the smuggler? ELSchissel (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flitworth
Talk:Homewood, Illinois

message: Important Note: My stupid hard drive crashed, and I no longer have an original copy of my references for the paper that I used to write the history sections of this article. I'll try to hunt them down when I get back to the Homewood Library again. Tsel 17:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Museum of the Game

message: Am I the only one bugged by them spelling video games as one word? It's just so annoying. I wish I could move this article but the site it's based on spells it incorrectly as well. TJ Spyke 06:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the website spells it this way, it doesn't really bother me. :-) — Frecklefoot | Talk 19:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it is completely irrational to be annoyed by this. see also: prescriptive linguistics -anon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.192.69 (talk) 03:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Videogames" is evil

message: I made a couple of changes here. In the history section, there were some passages that sounded like a PR-text. I kicked them out and left only the parts that actually stated facts. On the other hand, I removed the portion in the introduction where it says the site name is a misnomer. Just stating that it has videogames in the title but lists only arcade games is enough and more NPOV. Finally I removed the external links section. Since the whole article is about the site, it is already linked in the top right box, and a seperate link to the top 100 doesn't make a lot of sense. --84.112.30.185 19:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some changes 

message: Most of the history section is incredibly negative; it sounds like the author was dismissed or at leat not given the desired attention by regulars on the site and is trying to make the owners of the site seem incompetent.  162.136.193.1 (talk) 21:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not seeing it.  It says nothing about fraud or dusty web pages or bad karma, quite even handed, by my lights. - Denimadept (talk) 21:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Perhaps I didn't see it because I contributed to the KLOV before it was taken over.  I've seen. - Denimadept (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative POV 

message: # This page isn't for advertising your companies.
# How much of this is cited?  How much can be?
# There's waaaay more detail than is appropriate.  Right now, the "history" section is a list.  It should be redone as prose.
# Some of what you have to say seems to be first-person.  nonono.  - Denimadept (talk) 01:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments wrt expansion 

message: The history section ends in 2009, which seems to have been a major year for the site - from what I remember there was a dispute over the domain name. As the external links make clear there now appear to be two organisations (the International Arcade Museum and the Vintage Arcade Preservation Society), neither of which call themselves KLOV or use the KLOV.com domain. Neither of them push the KLOV name either, which seems to have been left to wither and die. The Couldn't this article be moved to International Arcade Museum, with a short line explaining that the Killer List of Videogames is a small part of a larger effort? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Status
Talk:Únětice culture

message: How is Únêtice pronounced?-Rychach 18:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Currently there is nothing said about the hypotheses concerning the origins and linguistic composition of the Únětice people, just as is done in the article on the Beaker people. In this site, I encountered the view that they were a Proto-Celtic people, a view that may be based on evidence, but this specific source is unreferenced. Is anyone here able to provide scholarly sources on this matter and incorporate it in the article? Omnipedian (talk) 13:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: Dear Yopie, you do not need me to prove, just go to Google and Google Books and enter "Aunjetitz culture", select preferences Only English Results, you will get all the references you need. The need to redirect to Unetice culture already demonstrates a need for explication. The book that brought my attention was published in 2010, by Oxbow Books, Oxford, in English. Barefact (talk) 09:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aunjetitz 

message: Is there any reason this article shouldn't be at Únětice culture, with a redirect back from Unetice culture? (It's spelled as "Únětice culture" in at least some English-language sources, e.g. Aldona Bieniek and Petr Pokorný (2005) "A new find of macrofossils of feather grass (Stipa) in an Early Bronze Age storage pit at Vliněves, Czech Republic" in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 14:4.) Q·L·1968 ☿ 19:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Únětice culture]]? 

message: Hello, I think the right archeological location ment in the text is Březno (Postoloprty) - has no English wikipage yet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.72.100 (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is link to Brezno correct? 
Talk:Third party (U.S. politics)

message: Given there are other meanings for the term third-party, it might be clearer to specify that this article only deals with politics and is not discussing a uniquely American law or legal meaning to an English word, for example.
Superb Owl (talk) 07:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: good idea--I agree.  Rjensen (talk) 08:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Me as well. Bulbajer (talk) 13:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving page to "Third party (U.S. politics)"?
Talk:GATT

message: This was originally a redirect, then a disambiguation page after someone added a link to graphics address translation table. To me, that is a fairly obscure term and a Google search on GATT refers primarily to General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Therefore, I have restored the original redirect and created GATT (disambiguation) to include the second meaning. RedWolf 20:22, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)
But it also refers to a Bluetooth Generic ATTribute profile, and I would have expected to see that on a disambiguation page, e.g. https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/gatt/generic-attributes-overview Dumbledad (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 10:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Jim Sasser

message: Why the Chinese version of his name?  64.122.95.110 19:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese?

message: I came here to learn the background of this gentleman, and find the following line in second para:
"Hooker, of course, has since become a somewhat laughable perennial candidate and gadfly (social).  "
Says who?  I've deleted this line as it is presumptive and hardly NPOV, and so I flagged this whole artice as NPOV.  I cannot read this article without questioning almost every statement, but I don't have the knowledge to fix it.  
More examples in question:
The phrase "his (intermittent) wealth" is not cited or explained.  
"At this time, Sasser seemed to be one of the Democratic party's brighter Senate stars,"  says who?  Again this is not NPOV.  
"Another factor in Frist's favor was that Sasser was never seen as possessing much charisma of his own."  Please!
This whole article really needs an NPOV makeover!
Axylotl 20:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Danger Mouse (musician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: pages not moved to the proposed titles at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 09:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 September 2022 

message: Hi all. I’m a budding Wikipedian so I will share more feedback and less large editing for now. A lot of this article reads as a resume, and the lack of citations makes a lack of context for the significance of each statement in a sea of statements. It currently sounds like “he did this and then he did this and then and then”, forever, indiscriminately. It could explain more about what makes the music he produces unique. Tell the reader why they need to care or learn more about this musician and how he has enhanced the field of music.
Trim the lead from so many dates and specific albums, to a more bold and direct and hard-hitting list of career highlights, and uniquely interesting facts to catch attention. How many albums, how many are platinum, how many collaborators or the list of the top collaborators like U2. Add the NYT statement of his philosophy, or the top world class statements that have been made about him. 
More about his personal life, inspirations, musical education, and motivation would greatly enhance this article.  I want to know more about how he developed his style.  Where did he get the funds to begin producing? How did he go from mere college student to getting people to listen to his remixed music in college? What was his childhood like, did it affect his desire to make music?  Then follow up with more information about his current life other than merely what he is producing. TheFactFairy (talk) 03:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback November 2023
Talk:Sede vacante

message: I'm surprised to see an edit summary that says "Popes can't resign!!".  Canon law says quite explicitly that they can, and it's happened twice. Michael Hardy 20:34, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine. I just changed it to CEST after Eastern Time US was posted.--207.65.109.90 23:46, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: It happens to be identical both in Italian and in the ablative case in Latin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Army1987 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 3 April 2005 (UTC)

text: Even if he had been elected on the same day, wouldn't there still have been a sede vacante, even if it only lasted a few hours? Nik42 01:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions (should relate to article improvement)

message: I don't know whether the following sentence is accurate or not, but if it is it belongs in the Pope article, not here:
:"Since the Pope is infallible after the declaration of 1870 in the Vatican Council, the Pope cannot be a heretic, and according to the likes of Alphonsus and St Thomas Aquinas, a heretic cannot be Pope."
So I've deleted it. Someone who knows more can decide whether to place it somewhere else. RussBlau 15:29, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
:It is correct, this is why the Old Catholics broke away. It was decided at this meeting that the pope was infallible. Logically, if the pope is infallible according to Catholics, he cannot be heretic. --Oldak Quill 22:59, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't sound quite right. The doctrine of infallibility doesn't say that the Pope is always infallible. Only on matters of faith and morals and only when he says that he's being infallible. ;) At least, so I've been taught. --User:Jenmoa 23:34, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

text: The teaching on infallibility - which by the way was not "decided" at Vatican I, but belongs to the Deposit of Faith, and had previously been asserted by Popes such as St. Leo the Great, Boniface VIII, Pius IX in one of his first encyclicals in the 1840s and implicitly in the Immaculate Conception dogma, and been taught by the theologians - has not been received as changing the teachings on the "papa haereticus" problem. The infallibility dogma means w.r.t heresy that the Pope cannot be a heretic in his infallible statements (not only "not heretic", of course, but also). Whether he can be a formal heretic at all (Honorius and Liberius were not), and if so, whether he ceases to be Pope upon becoming an obvious* heretic, are entirely different questions. [*The order of the Church requires that a hidden heresy, or an actually heretic belief in a doubtful matter, does not make a Papacy end - this, however, is merely my own private opinion, as well.] It is known that popes can (and without ceasing to be Pope) be material heretics w.r.t. dogmas defined only later, as the example of John XXII proves.--131.159.0.47 (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: Sedevacantism deserves at least a section in this article. savidan(talk) (e@) 00:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sedevacantism
Talk:Patsy Keever

message: The above text was taken from keeverforcongress.com with permission from her campaign.
:Does this permission include the right to modfiy the the text? If not we can't use it. --rbrwrˆ 20:36, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gray fox

message: Lead Section: I thought the lead section was very good. The first sentence would immediately identify what the animal is to so someone who doesn't know about it. The further you read the intro, the more you start to get an overview.
Content: All of the content in the article was relevant. I am not sure if the article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.
Tone and Balance: The article is written with a neutral tone of view. It was all written in the least persuasive way possible.
Sources and References: The sources are quite thorough, current, and backup the information in the article. Most of the links to the articles work, though some articles are less sound than others. Source 22, "Foxes World," seems unreliable.
Organization and Writing Quality: The article has a good flow and the writing is free of major errors.
Images and Media: The images enhance understanding of the subject and are laid out in an appealing way. Overall, a great use of images.
Talk Page Discussion: From the talk page section, it is unclear if the article is part of any WikiProjects. Most of the discussion in this section has to do with the diet of the Grey Fox and wether a line in the article that states the shape of the fox's eyes are ovular is factual.
Overall Impression: I think this is mid-tier article. It's merits are that it is moderately fleshed out and has lots of reliable sources to back it up, but there is hardly any discussion around the article to verify wether or not some of the facts stated in the article are true or not.
Thekingguy7 (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Review 10/15/21 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jdawwgg (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History

message: — Assignment last updated by Many miles to go (talk) 19:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Mammalogy