lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Adminship in other languages

message: Using my profound polyglot skills (*coughbabelfishcough*) I have compiled this list from the various other Wikipedia projects. I apologize in advance for any mistakes in translation as may occur - I'm pretty sure I got the numbers straight but I may have missed an extra clause or something. This list seemed like a good idea because there appears to be strong discontent at WT:RFA (I haven't read into depth yet as to why that is) and it never hurts seeing how other projects do things. Feedback welcome, and if people would want to add to the list I suppose the next five would be Japanese, Esperanto, Suomi, Solvencina and Chinese (all with 50000+ articles). 
There are some blatant differences between how this works in various languages, which is kind of funny to read about; I'll leave interpretation to others for now. >Radiant< 14:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is very interesting.  Many thanks for going to the effort.  What I find interesting is the common factors between most other Wikis which are not repeated here - most others seem to have a straight vote, explicit percentages for promotion, defined sufferage limits, and criteria for de-admin without formal dispute resolution. -- ALoan (Talk) 15:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually the Danes don't seem to have a very formalized process, with usually fewer than 10 people commenting. All administrators so far seem to have had unanimous support while all who have got significant objections have retracted their applications. The Norwegian nynorsk Wikipedia has a vote but no rules for interpreting it - the text says "if you feel more formal guidelines are needed please feel free to propose some", suggesting they could be based on the English ones or the Norwegian bokmål ones. The Icelandic and Faroese Wikipedias are small and have an informal process. Along with what we already have this exhausts the supply of languages I understand. Haukur 21:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the boundary seems to lie around 50k - Bokmål has 75.407 articles and a formal process while Danish has 49.074 articles and a less formal process. Haukur 10:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I think this would read better as a table (with links) since its purpose is comparison (not watching, please ) czar 05:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table
Talk:American auction

message: DropDeadGorgias, you wouldn't have a source on this point would you?  A quick google search hasn't turned anything up, either for or against their being the same thing.  OneLook gives only this Wikipedia redirect as a definition for "American auction".  Up to now my understanding has been that in an American auction there is the regular sequence of bidding, but unlike in the regular (English) auction, each of the bidders pays the difference between their bid (or bids) and the previous bid.  When bidding stops, the item goes to the last bidder.  The total amount paid for the item is the sum of all the differences.  I'd like to create a disambiguation page and a stub for "American auction"; any comments are appreciated. modify 14:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a while, but as I recall, when I first encounted this article, it was a redirect to "Dollar Auction", which is clearly incorrect.  At the time I believe I was able to find sources on Google saying that an American Auction was a Vickrey auction, but unfortunately it is now lost due to the wikipedia mirroring.  According to Google Books , the term American auction is merely the British term for an English auction (i.e. a multiple-unit, sealed bid auction).  I am not personally an authority on this source so I'm hesitant to speculate any further than that.  --DDG 14:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Many thanks, that's helpful to know. I think I'll do some more research and see if maybe it would be good to add a stub. Regards, modify 18:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  American and Vickrey auctions
Talk:Method of levels

message: I removed the "Testing" section because the same citation issue remains that I already mentioned in a previous edit summary (namely that citing an entire book is insufficient to verify the claim—specific page numbers are needed), but also because the single sentence in this section is not nearly specific enough to explain this subject. When and by whom has MOL been evaluated, and how has it been evaluated? This last question, how, is especially pertinent since the creators of MOL have written in the last couple of years about their discontent with psychotherapy evaluation, for example:
* 
* 
* 
Please discuss here how to create an informative section on the subject of evaluation of MOL. Biogeographist (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Individual psychology

message: * I added a line about the criticism from Popper that Adler's individual psychology is not testable. This could be expanded to include the reasons why it fails to be falsifiability. It would be good to expand this section to include other limitations and criticisms of this theory.  --Notgain (talk) 11:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Suggesting that Adlerian article be merge into this individual psychology and Classical Adlerian psychology also be merged too. To avoid confusion we might want to consider naming the article Adlerian individual psychology. --06:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: For Classical Adlerian psychotherapy,  Klbrain (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: For Adlerian,  Klbrain (talk) 10:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

text: For Classical Adlerian psychology,  Klbrain (talk) 07:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal, April 2018 

message: Some parts of the article need paraphrasing. For instance, while looking for sources, I found that the part citing Adler and Maslow's parallel theories had exact wordings from the text Counseling Psychology: An Integrated Positive Psychological Approach. If you have access to related sources, you could start checking the unreferenced contents. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphrasing 

message: The intro currently takes for granted expert knowledge of the subject.
Specifically: "were intended to mirror the indivisible unity of the personality." Can we rephrase this to make it more accessible?
Secondly, it says "The papers cover the whole range of human psychology in a single survey."
What does "a single survey" mean? If the papers were written over the course of years, then in what sense is it "single"? If "single" refers to them being published together as one book, then I believe "volume" or "book" would be a clearer word to use than "survey". BonaparteIII (talk) 22:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying the intro
Talk:Engineering Research Center for Wireless Integrated Microsystems

message: This information was found on the article for the radio station WIMS if you feel it necessary merge it with this page, sense I do not know about this article I will not attempt to do so myself and I also felt that it should not be erased without proper consderation.
--MJHankel 14:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random info 

message: University of Michigan is not represented with a project at :Category:WikiProject Universities. Please comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  02:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Michigan Project
Talk:Narrative therapy

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 15:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification 

message: Does Narrative therapy recognize any historical precursors of its method, or do its creators give credit to any philosophical or psychological schools of thought which have contributed to, or preceded it such as existentialist or phenomenology pioneers? I hope that the authors would be humble enough to give credit to their sources. If they have done so in any one of their publications then I suggest this material be immediately added to the entry, particularly as increasing criticism on the WWW cites the cultish exclusivity of narrative psychology/therapy, as well as its leader's supposed messianic overtones (not giving credit to historical sources). 124.177.174.58 (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No history??

message: Please add in-text citations. This request is indeed a "dominating cultural narrative" from Wikipedia policy, sorry if it interferes with the individualist narrative of not wanting to provide citations. 124.177.174.58 (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In-text citations needed

message: I removed the following listing, which seems to be little more then a bunch of linkspam. A listing of ten key books is more then enough here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this article sucks. If someone proposes deleting it, let me know. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading section removed 

message: The opening of this article (and indeed much of the body of it) uses too much jargon, and employs ridiculously turgid language such as--"By conceptualizing a non-essentialized identity..." What the what? The result is text that is almost unapproachable for even an educated reader. I am generally skeptical of philosophical and psychological systems that rely excessively on neologisms and the manipulation of narrowly defined technical terms, e.g., NLP. As it stands, the opening of this article gives the impression that one is encountering just such a questionable system here. If this is not the case, then plainer language should suffice for an introduction to the subject matter.Thaliomiles (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this article sucks. If someone proposes deleting it, let me know. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Comment on Overview 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
Talk:Licensed professional counselor

message: It states LPC (Or Variation, LCPC, LMHC..) -- An LCPC is a different license type altogether. You need to do more research before putting this out there as fact!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.55.99.2 (talk) 21:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: added a large section of text about Community Mental Health Counseling: Then and Now and Theoretical Orientations to Counseling, neither of which have anything to do with the topic of this article, which is the licensing process for counselors in various parts of the world. There are proper venues for the material these students wish to add (community mental health service and counseling psychology, respectively), but I suspect the students just need this material to be present in the article for their professor to grade. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not here to serve these students' academic needs. The article, with these additions, is now a logical mess with no coherence. I have twice reverted these additions (with several earlier reverts by ), but these students insist on having their way. In the spirit of WP:BRD, I have not reverted their latest restoration of this inappropriate material, but have rather opened this discussion of the matter. I invite them to join this discussion to help form consensus. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section added on 4 November 2014 

message: I added a paragraph showing that Alabama grants a licensing exemption to counselors who worked for legitimate non-profits and public charities. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exemption 

message: Please capitalize the article title... it should be... Licensed Professional Counselor Rich Kutney (talk) 03:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalize please
Talk:Type 95 heavy tank

message: I first have to say that how in the heck is this an article? There is no information about the tank except for some statistics and a little tiny pen mark at the top!--Ebell 14:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a pretty rude comment to make. ~  Dreamy § 02:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been expanded, WP:RS cited and photos added. Kierzek (talk) 01:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Documents from 2015 indicate that the gun used on that vehicle was not a 10cm cannon, but a 12cm Schneider naval gun:
https://i.imgur.com/hH2ioDe.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Eol46sS.jpg
This information has been corrected in the japanese version of this article, but I don't know how to bring over their references. Can someone more experienced help me?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:57A9:DC01:4D46:C2C:AED6:78D8 (talk) 11:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi-Ro Sha gun caliber is wrong 

message: 6 crew members not 5. Design was not just inspired by italian or german tanks and was more inspired by the independant. Wording is off too. 172.58.27.49 (talk) 02:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We have to go by what the WP:RS (reliable sources) state. Not opinion or World of Tanks game. Kierzek (talk) 11:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew number is wrong and other things
Talk:Nicolas Atwood

message: The sole source for the assertion of criminal convictions is in a London newspaper article about a non-crime the subject of the article committed, according to the FBI, as quoted in the article.
The article does assert he has a criminal record going back to 1997, but gives no times, dates or places.  The bare assertion isn't enough.  If someone can source the conviction(s) a bit less thinly, they shoul go back in, but not on the basis of this one article. David in DC (talk) 17:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  See Julie Kay, "Judge Rebuffs Stock Exchange's Request to Yank Information Posted by Animal Rights Groups", Daily Business Review June 2007. "Atwood has been arrested several times ... The incidents included painting a red anti-hunting message on the stainless steel swordfish on the IGFA Fishing Hall of Fame & Museum in Dania Beach, Fla., protesting at a circus in West Palm Beach and screaming "Meat is murder" while wearing a pig mask atop an Oscar Mayer 'wienermobile'." See also, Dave Barry, "A Frank Exchange", Miami Herald, July 13, 1997 and "Two charged for defacing Broward fishing museum," Palm Beach Post, December 21, 1998. I didn't think a detailed list of his criminal record was appropriate, hence the summary sourced from the The Times. Rockpocket 18:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong.  good call. Sorry. David in DC (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not a problem. I'm not a huge fan of the criminal categories myself, but as long as they are there I figure we should populate them. Rockpocket 18:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's an RfC going on at the talk page for the American Criminals category, right now.  Might be worth chiming in. David in DC (talk) 18:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal Record?
Talk:List of cities and towns in East Prussia

message: Since when we have East Prussia in Poland? That should be announce, that you write about old country. We don't have polish name of East Prussia.
Pole 15 sep 2006, 16:55
East Prussia was part of Germany and located in parts of Poland. Therefore German names apply to towns and places when discussing East Prussia. This is a historical debate and needs to be carried out on this level. Werner 21:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope

message: It would be a good idea to add a column for coordinates, using . Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 20:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Jean-Dominique Bauby

message: Does anyone know why he died? Complications? Another stroke? Something else? Nil Einne 14:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: This is totally like the character Noirtier de Villefort in the Count of Monte Cristo ~ Infrangible 02:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: We give his death as being on March 9, with the publication of the book as March 6, but we also say he died ten days after publication of the book. Do we mean "three days", or is one of the dates incorrect? Metamagician3000 (talk) 22:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jean-Dominique Babuy's death was on March 9 according to randomhouse.com and amazon.com, stating that he passed away two days after the French pulication of the book. A few other sources said he passed away three days after. I can't find the date the book was first published, so i've taken the liberty to change it to "two days" (which seems to be the more common period) -Senaiboy (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Jean-Dominique BAUBY est mort le 9 mars 1997, dix jours apres la parution de son livre "LE SCAPHANDRE ET LE PAPILLON"
This matches the "ten days" quoted on the Wikipedia article for the movie. MDWeathers (talk) 05:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy

message: The date of death is too much to be a coinsidence. I suppose he asked to be put to eternal sleep after seeing his book published, which was silently honored to him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.107.177 (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a ridiculous assumption, there are other possible explanations such as rushing to finish the book due to his ill health. Pneumonia isn't instantaneous, he would have been sick for a while. Alan Davies (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Euthanasia?

message: it was not Claude who listed alphabets but the speech therapist, wasn't it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.133.7.237 (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morse Code 

message: Can anyone find a reference for this statement?: 
"French science fiction author Bernard Werber's novel L'Ultime Secret is known to be inspired by Bauby."
Thanks. --Utilizer (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werber's Novel
Talk:Churchdown

message: I've tried to get the "largest village" claim across in a NPOV:
*several villages make the same claim - Largest village in England
*the World Gazetteer reference documents the population of "Innsworth-Churchdown" - this page is about Churchdown, Innsworth has a separate page.
*the rest of the content on the page wasn't consistent with the claim. --Fontles 14:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The mark on the top of the mountain says, as I saw today, that the hill is not only 154 but 155 meter high.Flk-Brdrf (talk) 22:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Here the proof  here - the Chosen Hill is 155 metres high]Flk-Brdrf (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churchdown Hill 

message: This circumstance is caused or at least "supported" by the fact that railway and motorway devide the village in 2 parts. Perhaps this is mention worth.Flk-Brdrf (talk) 11:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two centres 

message: The size of the village is missing. I have no clue where I could find these data.Flk-Brdrf (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: Have a look to the German version of the aricle. It is significant better! How can this be? Come on Englishmen, show more partiotism ;)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flk-Brdrf (talk • contribs) 10:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impovement of the article
Category talk:Nobel laureates by nationality

message: Please add to the article a note regarding the 'C' and 'P' designations.  Maybe 'P' stands for 'Peace', but I don't know what 'C' is for.  It may be obvious to some, but not to the casual reader.  Thank you.
CountMacula (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: These are general designations in Wikipedia "Category" pages. Each entry is backed up by links to either Wikipedia pages (P) or Wikipedia categories (C). You'll see these items given under every link in a Category page, not just here for the Nobel Prizes. Rthorndy (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the meaning of 'C' and 'P'?
Talk:Makino Nobuaki

message: A documentary broadcast on the 29th October 2023 on France 5 television channel, shows Makino under a completely different light
As someone who didn't want war against China, the US and who opposed expansionism
Could it be that the Wikipedia article is completely wrong in its assessment ?
https://www.france.tv/france-5/la-case-du-siecle/5339571-le-baron-et-l-empereur-japon-la-voie-de-la-guerre.html Varoon2542 (talk) 11:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary by Cedric Condon on France Télévisions
Talk:James Grant

message: The former entry read # James E. Grant III (1982-) Navy Hosptial Corpsman, Parris Island and Camp Lejeune, NC.". I yield to no one in the admiration I have for the service... BUT... if we included every enlisted person ever serving in the US Navy (or since we have an international focus, the Royal Navy or the Polish Navy or the Volksmarine) we'd have a VERY big naval gazette. If this Grant had won a medal, sure, but he appears to be a trainee at boot camp. Very commendable, to be sure, but not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. 
Cheers
15:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why remove particular grant
Talk:Liebesträume

message: "The piece is the last of the 3 that Liszt wrote". Did the ordering as published bear any real relation to the order in which they were composed, or is this a naive assumption?--Wetman (talk) 19:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to 5th ed. of Grove (1954), Nos. 1 and 2 (settings of Uhland) were written in c. 1849 and published in 1850, but No. 3 (a Freiligrath setting) was written in c. 1845 and published in 1847.  The piano transcription of No. 3 is more effective than the other two, at least for concert performance, and this to my mind is doubtless why the publisher put it last.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 06:53, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "No. 3"

message: I have always known it as Liebestraum and it seems to have been that way in common usage.  Why is the title Liebestraume?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.25.249 (talk) 04:20, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct.  "Liebestraum" is the singular; Liebesträume, the plural.  I will correct the article accordingly.  Kostaki mou (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liebestraum, not Liebestraume? 

message: Recording link to Andrew von Oyen, I removed it, because it only links to a general website of the artist, and not to a recording of Liebestraume...Instead, I replaced it with a majestic performance by Evgeny Kissin, much younger (and slender) Kissin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerjojo98 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link removed

message: Isn't the tune of Love Me Tender based on the main theme of the third Liebestraum?  --194.166.108.137 (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope.  It's based on the Civil War song, "Aura Lea" (q.v.).  Kostaki mou (talk) 22:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love me tender 

message: I'm not totally fond of the recording. I'd like to change it, but I'm not sure about what the rules are in terms of copyright and permission is for audio files on wikipedia. If anyone agrees and can guide me I'll try to find a good recording! Coulomb1 (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording of Liebestraum No. 3
Template talk:WikiProject Ottawa

message: NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT the scope of WikiProject Ottawa is being debated. Your input is requested. Thank you. GreenJoe 20:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: I am trying to change the sort-key for this template  in :category: WikiProject Ottawa, but I cannot use wp:Hotcat to do that. Can someone fix the template please? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Default sort key for categories