lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Princely County of Gorizia and Gradisca

message: This article is written almost entirely from a Slovenian nationalist viewpoint. It's not very balanced.Giordaano (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Slovenian nationalist viewpoint? Would you kindly elaborate. Viator slovenicus (talk) 23:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fascist provoker. --95.251.8.54 (talk) 23:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Slovenian bias

message: I changed the slovene gradiščanska to gradiška as gradiščanska is the slovene name for the austrian bundesland burgenland and gradiška is the name of the town in FJK. 89.143.67.119 (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The proper Slovenian denomination is Goriška in Gradiščanska and not Goriška in Gradiška. The Slovene name of the town of Gradisca is Gradišče and not *Gradiška, and the adjective of Gradišče is gradiščansko/i/a. Just take a look at any official document of the period and you'll see what was the Slovenian name of the county. Or at any secondary source, for that matter. Viator slovenicus (talk) 20:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the county

message: The article covers the whole history of the county, and not just from 1849 onwards, so the data in the infobox should be rectified or another article for the period from 1754 till 1849 should be created. At least the following data need review:
* date of establishment: 1754 or 1849
* status: crown land - was it used already before Austria-Hungary was established in 1867?
* predecessor states should be listed: Gorizia, Gradisca.
* the data in the government section of the infobox should be listed for the period before 1849.
--Eleassar my talk 14:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Golconda

message: Was Ramdas arrested at Golkonda?
Please be clear. It was told that the fort was built by Kakatiyas(language points to Ganapati Deva)but in the same statement,it is also mentioned that a Qutubshahi built it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.63.4 (talk) 06:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramdas 

message: id like to see a map showing the location of this place in relation to the city limits of Hyderbad.
99.164.123.146 (talk) 16:19, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  wheres the map showing the site? 

message: In several places the text reads like it was pieced together from multiple tourist brochures. Some features are mentioned repeatedly and in general there's an overabundance of superlatives.  To me (and I expect many American or European readers) this style of exposition doesn't leave the intended impression.  However, not being familiar with the topic or the original source material, I didn't feel qualified to edit it myself.76.191.214.212 (talk) 04:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort section is rambling and repetitive 

message: Please mention about the architecture of Golconda.....Dravidian or something extra??.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.181.131.76 (talk) 03:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture of Golconda 

message: There were findings which uncovered the facts of its(Golconda Forts's) construction way before it in 12th-13th CE in Kakatiya Dynasty. Dronal Bhardwaj (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynasty 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. This place seems more notable than other Golcondas as seen here. (non-admin closure)   Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Golconda Fort →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Privybst (talk) 15:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 September 2022 

message: Explain the story 49.206.50.103 (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golconda fort
Talk:Henry Starr

message: More info on him at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 21:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He was not the first man to use a car in the execution of a bank robbery, that "honour" goes to four men from France on 21 December 1911, so I am removing that particular claim form this article. 87.114.1.33 (talk) 08:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Use of Auto in Bank Robbery
Talk:Mandu, Madhya Pradesh

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.indorecity.net/excursions/mandu.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam Sailor 11:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hugh, Count of Champagne

message: Something really must be done about inconsistent dates in the main article. Count Hughes joined the Knights Templar either in 1118 or in 1125, but they cannot both be right.
Also, does anyone know the various dates on which Hughes travelled to Outremer (three times), and back to Europe (twice)?--DStanB (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent dates 
Talk:Kalinjar Fort

message: This is the most recent pre-copy-paste version of the page. Maybe it would be a good idea to revert to it? Someone the Person (talk) 21:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

message: :I just reverted to it. Someone the Person (talk) 00:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vallabhi

message: I have reverted to a previous version before the whole page was replaced by possibly copy/pasted essay-like content with contact details and owenership warnings that included numorus mention of "(Please contact Col D R Singh Sikarwar before editing on-Mob [...])". References, categories, infobox and interwiki links were also removed by this replacement. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ￼dgvacegebvsgdhndbsvshnwcqdacvejencc   gebegns hehcahbd bdcwcbrhd vsvchs fr gsbcehsnvsjd hebbecshd hbe ga jab ye 2409:4080:CE85:B73F:FAAD:ADE4:D1AD:CE74 (talk) 17:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: The article said: Maitraka rule ended with the sacking of Vallabhi by the barbarians in the second or third quarter of the 8th century by various other scholars. A search on Google Books  shows such sacking happened in 524 AD, not in the 8th century. The old versions of the article correctly gave that date, and somebody seems to have added WP:OR later on. So I am removing the reference to barbarians. - Kautilya3 (talk) 08:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And also the idea of "sacking the city." There is no reliable source for such sacking in the 8th century. - Kautilya3 (talk) 08:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbarians?
Talk:Takshashila University

message: I have removed the incorrect claim that Guinness Book recognizes Taxila as the world's oldest university.  The Guinness book recognizes a university in Morrocco, see here, as the world's oldest.  As I have mentioned above, Taxila was a center of learning, but (as Britannica says as well) it was not a university in the usual sense of the word.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guinness Book

message: Why is this page even here (i.e. in Wikipedia)?  The Taxila page is more extensive and has everything here and more. This page should simply be deleted, as there is not one sentence in it that is not already in the Taxila page.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this page exist?

message: Why do people feel the need to add text that is plainly not true?  The text mentioned that the Guinness book considered Taxila to be the world's oldest university.  That, however, is not true.  Next, another reference, Hartmut Scharfe's Education in Ancient India was cited as mentioning Taxila to be the world's oldest university.  I read through the relevant pages of Scharfe's book.  Nowhere does he call Taxila a university, let alone the world's oldest!  He is very careful to only refer to it as a center of learning.  Here is what he says: 
It's one thing to make a good faith mistake, but it's another to deliberately cite the Guinness Book or Scharfe's book for a claim, when there is no evidence for it in these sources.  That is falsification, plain and simple!  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why do people lie?

message: The UNESCO World Heritage List brief description describes Taxila as: 
Again, as I have repeatedly said above, no mention is made of a university.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UNESCO World Heritage Site Citation
Talk:Ancient universities of India

message: Takshashila, unfortunately, is not a university in the modern sense of the word.  According to Encyclopaedia Britannica:* Taxila. (2007). In Encyclopædia Britannica.  Retrieved January 15, 2007, from Encyclopaedia Britannica Online
Either Takshashila should be removed from the list or, more correctly, the name of the page should be changed to "Ancient Centers of Learning in India," since I suspect other "universities" (except for Nalanda) might have the same problem.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takshaśilā
Talk:8th & Ocean

message: South Beach is part of the City of Miami Beach not the City of Miami they are two totally separate municipalities. Miami Beach should be used. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 
Talk:Eleanor Steber

message: Dates differ from Find-A-Grave. Lincher 22:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The New Grove Dictionary of Opera gives 1916-1990. I will correct the entry. Kleinzach 22:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected the birth date to 1916. If anyone has information supporting a different date please give it here. Otherwise we should follow the Grove/Bernheimer date.  - Kleinzach 19:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Oxford Dictionary of Opera has 1914. --GuillaumeTell 17:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: I have removed the Wikification tag after copy editing. - Kleinzach 18:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification tag

message: The Strauss Four Last Songs performance noted around paragraph five was performed in Cleveland, JAmes Levine conducted, but the orchestra was The University Circle Orchestra, the orchestra of the Cleveland Institute of Music, where Steber taught. A few Cleveland Orchestra musicians were in the performance, but this was the school orchestra. 2600:6C5E:447F:FD8B:A142:EF53:B6CA:25D0 (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleanor Steber.
Talk:Jaintia Kingdom

message: In the Extent section, it says the following:
"The Jaintia Kingdom extended from the east of the Shillong Plateau of present-day Meghalaya in north-east India, into the plains to the south, and north to the Barak River valley in Assam, India."
However, geographically that makes no sense, specifically that last part about the Barak river. The Barak is to the south of the Shillong Plateau.
I wanted to make sure this was a typo before I went and corrected it.
Bytor (talk) Bytor (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent
Talk:Alfred Steele

message: The dates don't match on this article and on Find-A-Grave (1904 or 1900). Plus his name is Alfred M.??? Lincher 22:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: What about Steele's previous marriage(s) and children?  I remember his son, known by the nickname of Sonny.  Born around 1949 or 1950, I think. Stephengeis (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous marriage - children? 

message: Hello his first marriage years do not make sense, is it 1924 or 1929 2603:7080:E3F0:F10:A56E:F32D:46FC:B411 (talk) 04:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years
Talk:The Weapon Shops of Isher

message: The article credits Analog as publishing the early versions, but the magazine was Astounding Science Fiction until 1960.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:50C6:4600:FCD3:2BE7:F6D4:6E75 (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: Is it appropriate to list other novel that reference this one? Off the top of my head I think of F. Paul Wilson's Repairman Jack and S.M Stirling's Sunrise Lands (and other novels in the series). I'm sure I've read one or two other books with homages to this book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.113.86.38 (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Pala dynasty (Kamarupa)

message: you are repeating yourself without engaging any of the issues.  Even when evidence is shown against your claim, you move on without addressing it; and then you come back to it later repeating the same thing completely ignoring the fact that you have been shown as wrong.  So let us go at the issues one by one.
* Your claim: Shin very clearly did not consider Upper Assam as part of Kamarupa.
* Actual evidence: "Both the areas were deemed Kamarupa".
Are we agreed now that Shin considered Upper Assam as part of Kamarupa?
Chaipau (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Refocus

message: Discuss the proposed merger from Kamarupa_–_Late_to_end_period. Chaipau (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given that no case was made and there has been no support. Klbrain (talk) 05:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: In an effort to be properly encyclopedic, shouldn't we mention in this article which language was spoken in this kingdom? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which language was spoken?
Talk:Arab conquest of Egypt

message: I'm sorry but the sources used are laughibly biased. One of them is entitled something like "the war with Islam and the west". This tribalism will get us no where and it just reads like bashing people. If this page is to be taken seriously, attempt to at least balance the sources (preferably use ones that aren't overtly prejudicial, but if you will at the very least counter that with something else).  2A00:23C7:D98A:4E01:4D88:7C2:17A2:D58D (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sources used are a joke 

message: I had a second look at this section (see last stable version here), initially intending to clean it up. Not only is it unclear why there would be a "taxation" section in an article about the initial conquest, but the entire section is clearly written as a polemic with an obvious POV. Unsurprisingly, and more importantly, I found no reliable sources cited in the section; the sources ranged from random websites to books published by non-historians like Andrew Bostom (a medical doctor) and others, including possibly self-published works, all clearly polemic authors who are not academics on the topic. Given that it contributes nothing else to the article, I've removed the section for now ().
John of Nikiu, which is mentioned in the section, is indeed a well-known primary source and is mentioned elsewhere in the article, but if he is to be discussed it must be done in line with WP:NPOV and by referencing reliable secondary sources. This is already done further below with reference to Hugh Kennedy, an actual historian. If editors want, it is possible to create a section about controversies, but this should be done cautiously and the text should be transparent about the POVs being reported (e.g. see WP:CONTROVERSY). R Prazeres (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Taxation" section
Talk:Turkish archery

message: The references seem to be more Arab than Turkish, and more generically Middle Eastern than either. I'd suggest merging this article with Archery, in a section on Middle Eastern archery form, and deleting this article.Richard Keatinge 15:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tirendaz.com/en/?page_id=3, http://www.turkisharchery.info/?p=training, and http://www.turkisharchery.info/?p=competitions. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, I have reduced this article to a stub to prevent it from being deleted altogether. The material cannot be copied from the above websites. The first one states clearly "© 2009 tirendaz". The second one (turkisharchery.info) does not have a compatible license. It does not allow commericial use. Editors are free to expand this article but you must do so in your own words. Voceditenore (talk) 13:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Yabusame

message: There needs to be an article or section. Chris 02:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Takeda School of Mounted Archery

message: These sentences should be re-written and merged, but I'd need some facts first.
Nowadays, yabusame is performed at the Tsurugaoka Hachiman Shrine in Kamakura. It is also performed in Samukawa and on the beach at Zushi, as well as other locations.
It's also held twice a year at Toshogu in Nikko on festival days, and I soon found a few other locations with Google. Would it be preferable to list locations and dates of their yabusame demos, as this sort of information is what visitors to japan would like to know yet find hard to get? Is the Kamakura one special for some reason- largest, most popular, most famous?
DrHacky 01:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations 

message: The article gives the length of the track as 225m, and a previous edit had 208m. This site (http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/entry.php?entryID=1030) says 218m (=2 cho), while this blog (http://pacific-islander.blogspot.com/2007/05/yabusame.html) says 240m. Is there supposed to be a standard length, or is it more dictated by the space available at each shrine?DrHacky 01:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track length 

message: Would yabusame be best classified as a "type" of martial art, such as jujutsu, iaijutsu, hojojutsu, tessenjutsu, etc..., or more as a specific practice within the martial art of archery (kyujutsu or kyudo)?  I'm asking because I'd like to add an infobox to this article, and I need to choose between  and . Bradford44 (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would consider it a separate art. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Martial art or technique?
Talk:Partition of Bengal (1947)

message: Some resources on the article:
*
*
*
These are listed here for the purpose of use as reference in the article in future.--Dwaipayan (talk) 10:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some resources

message: Finished 'Economic impact'. Phew!
To do -
:Background
:Cripps mission
:United Bengal scheme
:Geographic details of partition
:Refugee crisis
:Other social impact
--Iball (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite 

message: Partition of subcontinent 119.157.74.5 (talk) 14:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partition of subcontinent 
Talk:Young Bengal

message: Young bengal movement 2409:4060:385:406E:F031:BA0:8F23:D2D3 (talk) 08:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Bangla 2409:4066:E95:27AF:C22C:20D0:9694:84D1 (talk) 06:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Young Bengal movement conclusion
Talk:Partition of Bengal (1905)

message: There should be some mention of the Swadeshi movement since it was triggered by the partition of Bengal. Miss Clio (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swadeshi 

message: the partition of bengal was first decided in 1903 and after 1905 and return in1911 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.52.155.4 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 11 February 2012‎
This article is totally biased as the partion of Bengal was not for administrative purposes rather was testimony to the divide and rule policy of Britishers who thrived on wealth of India ....stating this division as merely administrative would be non judicious to real facts 
 Melka 2 (talk) 13:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There are many subjective and possibly biased statements, as well as some potentially based in original research, all throughout this article. Knewhelns (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Neutrality" in Wikipedia means being neutral with respect to the reliable secondary sources. Therefore the 'bias' complaint does not apply here. Rjensen (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of article 
Talk:Gauḍa (city)

message: Article contains confused details on the history. Gauda was an ancient region spanning West Bengal, Pundravardhan and Bengal proper. Gauda, the city, is not from that era. It was built in the 12th century, probably during the Pala Kings. See page 119-120 https://books.google.com.bd/books?id=AqKw1Mn8WcwC  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adnanramin (talk • contribs) 10:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion: Gauda Region Vs. City
Talk:Revolt of the Earls

message: Why is there a picture of a penny red stamp at the footer of this page? I cannot see       
the signicance. pmh 03:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could it be an 'icon' indicating English history? Just a guess. MagnoliaSouth 05:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 'aftermath' paragraph on this page is written with appalling grammar, which is causing me to question the accuracy of the information itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.221.45 (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Aftermath' paragraph very badly written