Talk:Pappy Van Winkle's Family Reserve

message: Whoever wanted to remove this page is obviously not a bourbon fan.  I see nothing wrong with the entry here.  I removed any text indicating how it might taste or what awards the bourbon may have (or have not) won. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaplansa (talk • contribs) 21:13, 12 November 2007
:The present article and subsequent events make that unfulfilled desire look especially ill-advised.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2007

message: In this edit:  I removed two blog sources. Blogs are largely not acceptable as sources, because anyone can create them and claim to be an expert. See WP:BLOGS. These sources are not needed anyway, because there are two other sources given, and both appear to be reliable (see WP:RS). No change is required to the text of the article, and I made no other change.
I was reverted, with the edit summary "Yes, it does." I do not understand. Can someone tell me why my edit was reverted, and why these blog sources are required and acceptable here? Kendall-K1 (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Get rid of the blogs, which you say are redundant anyway.  My concerns relate mainly to getting something that explains the subject to the readers in terms they will think to be relevant.  If you don't have problems with the text, that ends that matter. Thanks.   7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd still like to understand why you reverted me. Was there some reason? Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Did not revert.  I did undo what I considered to be a WP:AGF edit, and provided a summary to that effect. I was wrong. Mistakes happen. I apologize. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blog sources 

message: Blog sources are not acceptable for BLP material. Please see WP:BLP and WP:BLOGS. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a "scope of the rule" issue.  The rule does not apply.  This is not a BLP issue since this is not a biography.  It is an article on a completely different subject matter.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It does apply. Did you read the links I gave above? The first sentence of WP:BLP says, "Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page." It also says "BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, categories, persondata, article titles and drafts." Kendall-K1 (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theft and blog sources 

message: This might be worth discussing.  Thought you might be interested.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [http://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2015/02/5-wheat-whiskey-alternatives-to-pappy.html Five Wheat Whiskey Alternatives to Pappy]

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pappy Van Winkle's Family Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070724161419/http://www.oldripvanwinkle.com/newbs/vw/website3.nsf/PagesByName/Heritage?opendocument&t=Heritage to http://www.oldripvanwinkle.com/newbs/vw/website3.nsf/PagesByName/Heritage?opendocument&t=Heritage
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131020104154/http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/was-the-great-bourbon-heist-an-inside-job/2jf0cz27i to http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/was-the-great-bourbon-heist-an-inside-job/2jf0cz27i
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pappy Van Winkle's Family Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070724161419/http://www.oldripvanwinkle.com/newbs/vw/website3.nsf/PagesByName/Heritage?opendocument&t=Heritage to http://www.oldripvanwinkle.com/newbs/vw/website3.nsf/PagesByName/Heritage?opendocument&t=Heritage
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pappy Van Winkle's Family Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110115180500/http://www.oldripvanwinkle.com/newbs/vw/website3.nsf/pagesbyname/home?opendocument to http://www.oldripvanwinkle.com/newbs/vw/website3.nsf/pagesbyname/home?opendocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: introduced a section from Kentucky.com telling a story of a bottle of this whiskey was given to the Pope. It's a fun story but I don't think it rises to the level of being a notable event for inclusion in an encyclopedia article. It strikes me as more of a "fun fact" and promotional in tone. I reverted this edit. 7&6=thirteen has decided to revert again, so I'm here to solicit any other opinions. --Laser brain (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gift to the Pope 

message: Footnote / reference 17 is a dead link.  Domain 'Insider Louisville' resolves to a 'purchase domain' ad.
(I could not figure out how to add the 'dead link' to the article, so I'm making note of it here.  Thank you.  FactsOverLies (talk) 05:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote / reference 17 is a dead link.  Domain 'Insider Louisville' resolves to a 'purchase domain' ad.