Talk:Strange Tales

message: chronologyproject.com shows that there are five volumes, but I'm not clear what the five are.  I see only four, particularly since they count Dark Corners separately. --Scottandrewhutchins 20:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Volumes

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: This isn't a disambiguation page but an article about the comic books from Marvel so I don't see why there is a section on pulp magazines here as there doesn't seem to be a connection between them and the comics. I'd suggest just nipping it out and moving it here for now - if anyone wants to start Strange Tales (magazine) they can use that (or we could just sling it over there but I don't know enough about the topic to know if notability could be demonstrated). (Emperor (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You probably have a point. The reason I'd included them is that, as you rightly note, they don't seem notable in and other themselves, yet because they exist and could turn up in searches and cause confusion, I thought it best to address them. But if you think they should be removed, I, for one, can go with your reasoning. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My inclination would be to move the stuff on the pulp magazines to a separate page. -- Beardo (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to go along with Emperor that notability might be a problem. Within a larger article titled Strange Tales we'd be remiss not to include them, since by floating around out there without explanation here could lead to confusion. They don't seem notable to warrant an article all on their own, though. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The pulp magazine has been described as a rival to Weird Tales. If it actually published any interesting stories it may be notable.  Also it was sister magazine to the original Astounding. -- Beardo (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Where was it described as that? If that and the Astounding connection are true, it might well could spin off. More solid information is needed. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulp magazines? 

message: I have reverted a new editor's changes, having already explained in an edit summary that he is doing original-research synthesis and POV essaying, including with a cite to a personal blog, about a character when this article is about the periodical. I asked this editor to discuss his concerns on the talk page, and he has clearly refused. I will now make a note on his page about edit-warring. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Today's edits

message: Substituted at 07:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment