Talk:2007 Glasgow Airport attack

message: A merge with 2007 London car bombs has been suggested, please discuss here. -- Goodnewsfortheinsane 14:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best way to get complete coverage is to merge them.  All of the news outlets that I have seen (all television) are indicating that this was a single "cell" or group and that the attacks were all part of a single chain of events.  The suspects are the same, the investigations beind conducted are the same. Dalf | Talk 13:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I think there should be a merger to an article with the title akin to the  “2007 Islamist Attacks in Britain”. Another option is to use the Scotland Yard case name that they refer to in the investigation. 216.174.52.64 13:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge. The same people from the samebackground using the same petrol and propane concoction.Koonan the almost civilised 22:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Leave for the time being. There are different flavours to come out of this. Whilst the activities are related, the Scottish perspective and reactions are important. The events are distinct, even if the perpetrators are linked. Over time, the events may become less notable and deserve merging, a perspective on this will only become clear in a few weeks at the earliest. An alternative solution might be to have a merged overview document, which can embrace the long term aftermath and keep the detail of the two events and immediate (local) aftermath. Spenny 22:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Leave for the time being.I agree with this poster,TerriersFan.Over time more details are likely to emerge,There is likely hood of these events to be result of racial attack on unarmed Late Kafeel and Dr. Abdulla. Commentry from Sky News editor Tim Marshall has mentioned in his analysis it could have been an act of crime, it can't be a sucide attack due to the fact that there were two people in Jeep, further reading on Tim Marshall's article.
#REDIRECT " Was This Meant To Be A Suicide Bombing?" http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-1273108,00.html (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2007_Glasgow_International_Airport_attack&action=edit§ion=1#)Hector, Toronto 206.210.113.200 09:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge (July 3) 

message: 
- Bevo 16:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm...WikiProject Scotland, if that's what you mean. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 17:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I am curious about the "Low-importance Scotland articles" category association that seems to go along with the current content of that tag's parameters. - Bevo 17:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See here for details. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 17:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've requested a reassessment using that link. - Bevo 18:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who maintains this tag embedded in this talk page? 

message: "One of the surviving attackers has been identified as Bilal Abdullah, an Iraqi Muslim doctor working at the Royal Alexandra Hospital.[11][12] Another attacker, Kafeel Ahmed..."
While I appreciate that it's pretty evident that they are guilty, does treating it as fact that the two arrested at the scene and those arrested afterwards are all guilty not breach libel or slander guidelines??GiollaUidir 22:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not even close. GrotesqueOldParty 22:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Slander is spoken so if anything, libel would apply. However, common prudence indicates that we should use terms such as 'suspects', 'those arrested' etc rather than 'attackers'. TerriersFan 22:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cheers! That's what I was getting at. :)GiollaUidir 23:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Bilal Abdullah was pulled from the burning vehicle: thus I think it fair to use the term "attacker". In any case "attacker" is not a legal term (as far as I know), so I don't see how "presumed guilt" has anything to do with it. DiggyG 04:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We are writing an encyclopaedia not a tabloid so we keep to value-neutral wording. TerriersFan 21:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe there's any Wikipedia policy about this specific question.  If there is then someone please provide a link.  I don't agree that always using the term "suspect" for someone is "value-neutral wording".  To violate Godwin's Law, I'll offer the example that Hitler was never tried and convicted by a court for war crimes, but it's fine to describe him as a war criminal on Wikipedia.  Tempshill 03:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BLP is relevant. TerriersFan 15:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Oops, Hitler was tried and convicted at Nuremberg in absentia, according to List of war criminals.  Well, pretend he wasn't when reading my example above and the idea is the same.  Tempshill 03:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's dead, so we don't actually care as much. We can't be going around claiming all these people attacked Glasgow airport when they have not been convicted as such, that can do an awful lot of damage to them, and it is not something we are in a position to decide or have any right to do. We are neither judge, jury, nor executioner- we are someone who sits at the back, watches, and writes about what happens. J Milburn 12:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: A libel law breach doesnt' really apply here, it would probably only occur if the suspects were cleared of the charges against them, they would have a good case for being libelled. In England, the main legal problem  here with designating them as attackers would be falling foul of contempt of court laws, i.e the serious risk of prejudicing any jury trial by presuming them guilty. Their defence could claim it was impossible to have a fair hearing if jurors had read this article. It's a strict liability offence, not indending to derail the legal process is not a defence. As far as I am aware, Scottish law has a tougher line then English and Welsh law (although it has been decided any charges brought will be tried in England).Kijog 17:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it as a matter of law, rather a matter of doing what is right. Emotive words are neither necessary nor responsible. TerriersFan 17:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree with TerriersFan, but what does Californian law say on the matter?  I believe that is the jurisdiction that applies to Wikipedia Lynbarn 17:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Florida Law as that is where the servers are and the NFP Corp is incorperated. (Hypnosadist) 17:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Also i think niether Attacker or Suspect are appropriate, how about just using their names or perpitrators. (Hypnosadist) 18:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Suspect is fine once they have been arrested since it describes their status but it will need to be changed if they are not charged. Perpetrators is not satisfactory though 'alleged perpetrators' would be. TerriersFan 15:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia needs to conform to academic standards, not legal ones: whether or not these men carried out the attacks is not in question: they were pulled from the burning vehicle and they left a suicide note. It would be wrong to use "guilty" or "convicted", but we should not have to avoid use of "attackers" and "perpetrators", when very clearly that is what they are: well respected newspapers, magazines and academic publications refer to them in this way even without the benefit of a trail. DiggyG 20:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presumed Guilt/Libel 

message: The embedded warning in the beginning of the article is a bit extreme.  I work with many different British and American articles and generally leave the spelling as it is, no matter whether the article is British or American, as long as it is a generally accepted spelling in either vernacular.  But the harsh admonition "DO NOT" is tacky, off-putting to editing, and seems unnecessary, since the article is very new, and it doesn't even really matter whether British or American spelling is used.  Unless a large problem has occurred wherein Brits can't understand the article because American editors have been consistently using American spellings, I believe the warning should be removed.--Gloriamarie 19:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It tends to be used, in such strong terms, in articles where the spelling is constantly being changed due to uninformed editors.  When this page was a hive of activity the spellings were no doubt being changed every hour and that required someone to revert and try to keep on top of things while differentiating from useful edits.  The 'Strong' wording tends only to be used in these circumstances, perhaps it can be toned down now that this is off the main page, but if all the spellings start changing again then it might need to go back up.  Long term problems on other articles necessitate the tags staying permanently - it may be a bit harsh, but I think that is preferable to someone spending 40 minutes changing 10's of spellings in an article only for them to be reverted 5 minutes later because of the spelling conventions. SFC9394 19:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or worse, when it's missed for a while and someone then has to manually revert all the changes. Or even worse IMHO, when an article started in one form and is spuriously changed into another form by an editor but this is missed and it ends up staying in the new form which is against policy Nil Einne 07:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Guys, please, lets be fair... it IS a UK article, it should have British English. If I have time I will go through the article and remove/change American spellings if there is any. It is generally considered orthodox to have a British article with British spellings. But yes, a warning is going a bit too far when everyone knows that American articles generally should have American English and British with British English. ScarianTalk 15:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, my apologies, I jumped the gun a bit. I should've checked your nationalities before making an assumption. Sorry! ScarianTalk 15:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: American vs. British spelling differences

message: Please note that the entry contains a statement implying an allegation is an established fact.
The entry currently states: "A suicide note indicated that the two had intended to die in the attack.[14]"  The link is to a recycled Times of London article which appeared in The Australian.
This was published by the Glasgow Evening Times:
"Scotland Yard refused to comment on a report last night by American TV news network CNN that police had found a suicide note written by one of the Glasgow Airport attackers." 
Source: http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/display.var.1521658.0.taxis_back_at_airport_as_terror_level_is_cut.php
Publication date 05/07/07
The entry should be updated to reflect what is known. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.46.86.154 (talk) 06:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it depends on the definition of attack.  In the post war timeline there have been malcontent attacks in the past (various Scottish independence related) that could be quantified as "terrorists" (though the wording is always going to be pejorative).  Going back into history though (1745 and before) everything is littered with plots and, what would be defined today as, attacks.  This is probably one of the first in a long long time on Scottish soil to be solely defined by foreign elements rather than home-grown malcontent though. SFC9394 13:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the alleged attackers are British though, are they not? Nil Einne 07:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged suicide note 

message: I have added the eye witness report that one of the attackers was shouting "Allah" back into the article.  Previously there was a discussion about this at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2007_Glasgow_International_Airport_attack/Archive_1#Allah. I have taken care to provide three references from mainstream credible news organizations.  The former discussion engaged in original research (see Wikipedia:No original research) about why they didn't believe the news reports.  If you follow the link to Wikipedia:No original research readers will see that this is not how the Wikipedia works.  I cannot find any credible sources which back up the original research discussion, but if there are any then it would be fine to put in something like "Although one eyewitness said that the man was throwing punches and repeatedly shouting "Allah"[refs here], some commentators have called the reliability of this report into question[more refs here]".  However, assuming that no such references exist, then it is my view that a well-referenced report of what one of the attackers was shouting at the times of the attack needs to stay. Greenshed 19:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree,  The comment should stay - The three references, although one is third-hand, should be credible enough to stand - the criteria here is surely that the sources reported it, even if it may not have been exactly as it occurred.  Regards, Lynbarn 20:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouting "Allah" 

message: Just to let you know. Don't remove the section entirely but feel free to trim or change it as you think appropriate, or discuss it here. I also added a reference about Smeaton's appearance at the Edinburgh Fringe.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He will also apparently be appearing at Ground Zero in New York City on September 11th, 2007 for a ceremony.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've just merged John Smeaton here 

message: *Please see here.-h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Merged back into a bio for Smeaton by community consensus--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 10:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Smeaton merge on deletion review 

message: I changed the reference to Glasgow as "a city with an exceptionally violent reputation in the UK" to "a city whose citizens are considered by the rest of the UK to be amongst the last with whom one would pick a fight."  There are no objective grounds for calling Glasgow an exceptionally violent city in comparison with London, Belfast, Manchester, Liverpool or several other British cities. The "violent Glaswegian" is, I feel, a pejorative prejudice which should not be reinforced any more than other derogatory and unfair cliches such as the "stupid Irish", the "lazy black," the "shifty Asian," etc., etc.
ReggyRaccoon 18:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Reaction 

message: In the Events section of the article, it says that one terroritst was held down by "a member of the public," rather than by John Smeaton, and there is a hidden note which reads "EDITORS: citizen's name removed as per talk page discussion PLEASE DO NOT REVERT". There is no such discussion here. Why isn't he named? He is mentioned only once, in the last sentence of the article, under the heading Public Reaction, and it makes no mention of the fact that he got the Queen's Mallantry Medal for ... helping to arrest a terrorist. I'm going to give it a couple of days and then put his name in. Richard75 (talk) 14:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Richard75 (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Smeaton 

message: Do we really need a heading for EVERY SINGLE paragraph??GiollaUidir (talk) 12:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits 

message: The article states, "The attack occurred three days after the appointment of Glasgow-born Scottish MP Gordon Brown as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, but Downing Street dismissed suggestions of a connection,[5] although a close link was quickly established to the foiled attack on London the previous day."  Yet the article to the 'foiled attack on London' states, "Although this event coincided with the appointment of Gordon Brown as Prime Minister two days earlier, Downing Street dismissed suggestions of a connection[4], although a close link was quickly established to the attack at Glasgow Airport the following day."
Which event was actually, if any, tied to the new PM?
Swya (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now fixed. - Salamurai (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

text: The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 09:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Glasgow Airport attack →  – The current title is inconsistent with the current naming convention WP:NCEVENTS, which recommends, "in the majority of cases", to indicate in the title when the incident happened. Adding the date would also make the title WP:CONSISTENT with the majority of other vehicle-ramming attacks (see this list of vehicle-ramming attacks). Pilaz (talk) 15:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion / Duplication / erroneous info? 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :2007 Glasgow International Airport attack's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "BBC2":
From War in Somalia (2006–2009):  
From 2007 London car bombs: 
Reference named "Telegraph1":
From 2007 UK terrorist incidents: 
From 2007 London car bombs: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now fixed. - Salamurai (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:2007 Glasgow International Airport attack]] 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070630/ap_on_re_eu/britain_airport_crash_38
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:55:37, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/06/30/london.alert/index.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:55:47, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070701/ap_on_re_eu/britain_airport_crash_48
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:56:12, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1103AP_Britain_Terrorism_Glance.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:56:13, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 4 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/07/01/london.alert/index.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:56:22, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 5 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6748610,00.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:56:34, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 6 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/security/current-threat-level/
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:56:48, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 7 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.timesnow.tv/Indian_behind_Glasgow_terror_plot/articleshow/2177064.cms
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 400 Bad Request
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 400 Bad Request
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:56:56, 400 Bad Request
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 8 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.buckinghamtoday.co.uk/latest-national-news?articleid=3028112
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:57:07, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 9 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.timesnow.tv/Sections/News/New_twist_to_Kafeel_probe/articleshow/2191515.cms
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 400 Bad Request
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:04:59, 400 Bad Request
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:57:16, 400 Bad Request
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 10 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-6748751,00.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:05:03, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:57:28, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 11 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.mychemicaltoilet.com/2007/07/t_in_the_park_security_increas.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:05:02, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:57:38, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 12 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6748770,00.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:05:04, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:57:49, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 13 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/06/run-for-your-li.html
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-26 02:47:56, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-05-27 15:05:03, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack on 2011-06-15 13:58:01, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 14 

message: Wouldn't "unsuccessfully treated for burns" be more logical than "treated for fatal burns"?Royalcourtier (talk) 03:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treated for fatal burns? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081207074134/http://www.iht.com:80/articles/ap/2007/07/01/news/UN-GEN-UN-Britain-Terrorism.php to http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/01/news/UN-GEN-UN-Britain-Terrorism.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071014182818/http://news.sky.com:80/skynews/article/0,,30100-1273160,00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1273160,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080517014458/http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1272910,00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1272910,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071009105819/http://news.sky.com:80/skynews/article/0,,70131-1273148,00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1273148,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071009122509/http://news.sky.com:80/skynews/article/0,,30000-1273245,00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1273245,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070704230802/http://www.news.com.au:80/story/0,23599,22009119-29277,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22009119-29277,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071001002250/http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2737136.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2737136.ece
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930200950/http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200707070301.htm to http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200707070301.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071102162610/http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com:80/index.cfm?id=1041142007 to http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1041142007
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071102162610/http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com:80/index.cfm?id=1041142007 to http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1041142007
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071102162610/http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com:80/index.cfm?id=1041142007 to http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1041142007
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080705125737/http://www.internationalreporter.com/News-2370/Bin-Laden-speeches-found-in-Kafeel-Ahmed%E2%80%99s-house-in-Bangalore.html to http://internationalreporter.com/News-2370/Bin-Laden-speeches-found-in-Kafeel-Ahmed%E2%80%99s-house-in-Bangalore.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070626211831/http://www.dhs.gov:80/xinfoshare/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm to http://www.dhs.gov/xinfoshare/programs/Copy_of_press_release_0046.shtm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070703042716/http://news.sky.com:80/skynews/article/0,,30100-1273090,00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1273090,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110629020742/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070701/ap_on_re_eu/britain_airport_crash_48 to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070701/ap_on_re_eu/britain_airport_crash_48
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121017033541/http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1103AP_Britain_Terrorism_Glance.html to http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1103AP_Britain_Terrorism_Glance.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070926232846/http://www.newkerala.com/news5.php?action=fullnews&id=44341 to http://www.newkerala.com/news5.php?action=fullnews&id=44341
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110524133226/http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1177062007 to http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1177062007
*Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6748770,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070930043627/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/FullcoverageStoryPage.aspx?id=0e3a36c1-06ca-40dd-a1d3-5ed87ac5e93dindiandocsinukterrorplot_Special&&Headline=Sabeel,+Kafeel+had+joined+Tabligi+Jamaat:+Bangalore+police to http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/FullcoverageStoryPage.aspx?id=0e3a36c1-06ca-40dd-a1d3-5ed87ac5e93dindiandocsinukterrorplot_Special&&Headline=Sabeel%2c+Kafeel+had+joined+Tabligi+Jamaat%3a+Bangalore+police
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/security/current-threat-level/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2730425.ece
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23402861-details/Police+track+bomb+plotters+by+email+across+the+world/article.do
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/4935703.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/06/run-for-your-li.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2007 Glasgow International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703042716/http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1273090,00.html to http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1273090,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524133226/http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1177062007 to http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1177062007
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703173026/http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_12442.aspx to http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_12442.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2007 Glasgow Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218103547/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081217/terror_UK_081217/20081217?hub=World to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081217/terror_UK_081217/20081217?hub=World
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927235432/http://story.malaysiasun.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/b8de8e630faf3631/id/262119/cs/1/ to http://story.malaysiasun.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/b8de8e630faf3631/id/262119/cs/1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is the attack defined as a suicide attack? The terrorists just rammed a car into the building. The fact that one of the preparators died doesn't make him a 'suicide bomber' as shown in the infobox.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.53.167.48 (talk) 12:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A suicde attack? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 16 external links on 2007 Glasgow Airport attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704051108/http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/leaders.cfm?id=1027012007 to http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/leaders.cfm?id=1027012007
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C30100-1273160%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0%2C8599%2C1639071-2%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.theguardian.com/worldlatest/story/0%2C%2C-6748610%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C30100-1273090%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C70131-1272910%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2007%2F07%2F05%2Fnterror205.xml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C70131-1273148%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C30000-1273245%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C23599%2C22009119-29277%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081217/terror_UK_081217/20081217?hub=World
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2007%2F07%2F03%2Fnterror303.xml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23402861-details/Police%2Btrack%2Bbomb%2Bplotters%2Bby%2Bemail%2Bacross%2Bthe%2Bworld/article.do
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/FullcoverageStoryPage.aspx?id=0e3a36c1-06ca-40dd-a1d3-5ed87ac5e93dindiandocsinukterrorplot_Special&&Headline=Sabeel%2C%20Kafeel%20had%20joined%20Tabligi%20Jamaat%3A%20Bangalore%20police
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.theguardian.com/uklatest/story/0%2C%2C-6748751%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0%2C%2C30100-1273090%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ohio State University attack which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 22:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 09:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Glasgow Airport attack →  – The current title is inconsistent with the current naming convention WP:NCEVENTS, which recommends, "in the majority of cases", to indicate in the title when the incident happened. Adding the date would also make the title WP:CONSISTENT with the majority of other vehicle-ramming attacks (see this list of vehicle-ramming attacks). Pilaz (talk) 15:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 August 2022