lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lay brother

message: My understanding was that post Vatican II, the Lay Brotherhood was essentially eliminated as a seperate vocation; while there are a few 'leftovers' around, no new lay brothers are accepted, the roles that they previously filled being passed either to ordinary monks or to the general lay community.  The article states that there are lay brothers present in every branch of Catholic monasticism as though it were current practice; I think that this may be a hold-over from outdated text incorporated from the public domain Catholic encyclopedia.  Would anyone care to clarify this? --Clay Collier 11:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2005 

message: The info printed in this article is from the 1913 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia and is VERY outdated! The majority of verbs in the present tense need to be changed to the past tense, in order to express that lay brothers and lay sisters were a part of past history. Religious Brothers do still exist, even entire orders (non-ordained male religious), but this article does not explain their unique vocation. A Brother is no longer viewed as some type of second class manual worker, or someone who failed his studies for the priesthood. This article desperately needs to be revised!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.131.5.129 (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2007 

message: --Punahou academy? Huh? Can someone with more knowledge check if this is an act of vandalism? It doesn't sound right to me.87.198.195.156 (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2008 

message: The article states that the institution of lay brotherhood exists in Eastern Orthodoxy as well as Roman Catholicism, but does not actually discuss examples of the former. And I am not aware of any such distinction in Orthodox monasticism, at least not formally, though at least one scholar think that the distinction between the Small Habit and the Great Habit was developed in part to reflect some such distinction in practice (Karl Holl, Enthusiasmus und Bussgewalt beim griechischen Mönchtum, a classic work but dated -- late ninetheenth century).
--Horatio325 (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Orthodoxy? 

message: This page shouldn't exist. It only cited one source, from more than a century ago, that used outdated terminology in reference to what is today usually called a religious brother. That page already exists and has more or less the same information contained in this article. My deletion tag was opposed, so I've added a number of sources to the lede that show there is no distinction in modern terminology between lay brothers and religious brothers. natemup (talk) 12:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same thing as [[religious brother]]
Talk:József Mindszenty

message: I dont understand, where he lived during period 1956-1971; in US. Embassy in Budapest?? Could somebody clear this up?
User:Jugoslaven 27.VIII. 20005. 14:09 CET
:Yes, this is true. I fixed some other errors using http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B3zsef_Mindszenty. -- Hreid 16:49, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: USA Embassy Exile

message: Added info on controversy, structured, a little bit expanded. Mindszenty was much like Ratzinger is. 195.70.32.136 15:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded. 

message: hungarian-speaking linguists, please add in IPA pronunciation of his name. is it /juzef mindsentj/ or smth similar? BirgittaMTh (talk) 09:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am neither, but it is /jo:ʒɛf mindsɛnti/ (not /mindsɛnc/). --Gwafton (talk) 23:58, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct pronunciation of the name? 

message: "He continued to use the traditional title of prince-primate (hercegprímás) even after the use of noble and royal titles was outlawed by the puppet parliament of 1946." This characterization of the Parliament as a puppet is inaccurate, as during this time, the Független Kisgazdapárt (FkGP) held power with a 50% majority in Parliament. Although the government itself had Communist influence, the Parliament was not controlled by the Communists, as they only took over a year later in 1947. Trigoloki44 (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungarian Parliament labelled as "puppet parliament" in 1946 

message: Mindszenty was an antisemite that backed efforts that culminated in the Hungarian Holocaust. The article implies this isn’t the case, that only a lone reporter claimed it. Please see  https://www.yadvashem.org/articles/academic/the-christian-churches-of-hungary-and-the-holocaust.html Philip.e.kahn (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitism
Talk:DCEThreads

message: User 81.130.67.232 wrote:
(POV check: tell me about it!!  i'll think of something, plus some reference info from the source code to back up my "POV", another time.  if anyone themselves wants to check, see http://sf.net/projects/freedce and also using google perhaps it may be of help to see the Wine-devel mailing lists on winehq, searching for FreeDCE, DCOM and lkcl as keywords)
: I've added some comments on your talk page. Richard W.M. Jones 13:13, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:WBBR

message: I've been working on a draft of this article saved here in my Sandbox. I've addressed the issue of the lack of citations, reformatted the History section by adding dated subsections and expanding the current Bloomberg programming section. My contributions to this article do represent a WP:COI as I am affiliated with Bloomberg L.P. However, I have asked for feedback from two outside editors, Dravecky and Vchimpanzee, to be sure the article follows WP:NPOV, which they have confirmed. I would also like to solicit feedback from others who are interested in this article before implementing any changes. Would love to hear any thoughts or suggestions. Thanks! Ordwayen (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I don't know about confirmed. It looked okay to me.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 18:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: All set. Thanks everyone for your help! I've added a sentence to the intro about the origins of WBBR with the Jehovah's Witnesses along with the citation suggested. Please let me know if I can be of any help revising the article further.Ordwayen (talk) 14:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Revisions 

message: : Hey, I saw this station, and I thought I recognized the initials. 
: It was a radiostation (on Staten Island) owned by the Jehovah's Witnesses. It aired in 1924. se this site
:Can you add this? or make a new page? --87.57.219.127 (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is there; it's just not very prominent.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 18:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction. I was remembering a draft, and adter looking at discussion of that draft, it appears the information won't go there. I think this should be mentioned, and if that article qualifies as a reliable source, go ahead.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 18:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

text: I found some more info. I am not so good with English grammas. So I hope someone puts it in? Here and here.--87.57.219.127 (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jehovah's Witnesses
Talk:Willow (1988 film)

message: The article contradicts itself on this point. Is it both? If so, that should be clarified inline. Hijiri 88 (聖やや
) 12:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it Eborsisk or Sispert? 

message: It would be better if this were either an animation or at least a side-by-side with multiple frames (at least 3, though 5 would be ideal), so you can see the actual transformation. — trlkly 14:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital morphing image 

message: Is there a citation for that rambling train wreck of a paragraph that Val Kilmer allegedly Tweeted about a possible sequel to Willow? Xin Jing (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kilmer Tweet About A Possible Sequel 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved - no consensus. Some opposition not addressed, despite much support for the motion. (non-admin closure)  Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Willow (film) →  – There is another film Willow (2019 film). 71.95.108.35 (talk) 19:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: INCDAB (opposers) and PRIMARYFILM (supporters) camps remain at war with each other. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 November 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure). The bar for an incomplete disambiguation is high (significantly higher than for a usual primary topic) and in this case there is a rough consensus that this topic does not reach that bar.  Jenks24 (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Willow (film) →  – title is clearly ambiguous as there is more than one film with this title.  Per WP:DAB and WP:PRIMARYFILM, titles should be fully disambiguated if any ambiguity exists. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC only applies to undisambiguated titles, not partially disambiguated ones like this, unless an expcetion is made per WP:INCDAB.  However, the general consensus on film is per the guideline WP:PRIMARYFILM so we need to defer to that here as the group consensus clearly trumps any individual consensus. --woodensuperman 12:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 October 2023
Talk:Vesara

message: *Indian temples
*Central Indian temple architecture style
*Nagra – Dravida – Vesara Pictures
**All three sources, I have given just for examples - there may be several others. --Bhadani 15:21, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some sources
Talk:Emil Nobel

message: This is an unnecessary article that will never be more than a substub. Emil Nobel is mentioned in the article of his father, and he didn't do anything more remarkable than dying at a young age. I have previously turned this into a redirect to the father and intend to do it again. If the redirect is again reverted, I will list the page on VfD. Uppland 14:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gioconda Belli

message: A previous version of this article stated that Belli has received the Nobel Prize in Literature, which as the linked article shows, is not true. 82.210.117.215 14:47, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Noble prize

message: Quotation: "She was designated among the 100 most important poets during the 20th centuryNicaragua.com - Literature - NicaraguaExcerpt: Moon guide to Nicaragua" - there are two sources for this statement - but unfortunately the sources does not explain, WHO made this selection of 100 most important poets (United Nations?? - Literary critics? )  - so these are not good references. I doubt also that these sources are independend from another. The sentence should be deleted, until there is a better explanation. Plehn (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  100 most important poets ??
Talk:Chris Helme

message: Slapped the expand tag on there as well because I think this article can become something, but as it is, it's not enough to warrant something different than his band. I'll come back in a few days. Karmafist 14:48, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tommy Salo

message: Forsberg wouldn't have his stamp if Salo had failed.
And Salo wasn't the only one who failed against Belarus.
NPOV requires all sides, not just the popular ones.
Hdw 22:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey Please add that Tommy salo Was in IHFF World Championship 2003 then on his International History okey thanks. Joel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JOEL-5 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tommy Salo International History.
Talk:Frances Slocum

message: Since it is unreferenced, where did the one big chunk come from?  Mattisse 16:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost all of this article was added Feb. 5, 2006 in one big chunk. 

message: It says she was 4 when taken in the opening and then later says she was 5.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.20.220.61 (talk) 01:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 or 5 years old
Talk:Weston, Florida

message: This sentence in the opening paragraph seems to need some type of factual citation -- I don't think census statistics or the residency status of prominent American athletes is a legitimate bona-fides.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.199.35.172 (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Weston is an affluent"... 

message: I added an advertisement template to the article after noticing multiple sections (notably history, sports, parks, and Weston Town Center sound more promotional than encyclopedic. I believe this article has been edited for tone before, and while it is mostly tone-neutral, the focus of the article seems to mostly be information relevant to people considering moving to the city rather than someone wishing to gain a general overview of the city. Arecaceæ2011 (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: I have completely reworked the parks & recreation section. The section, in my opinion, felt more like an advertisement (something which should be avoided on Wikipedia) and as if it was would be best suited for WikiVoyage, one of Wikipedia's sister projects. I will make a WikiVoyage page on Weston and incorporate the park info originally in this article (minus the references as they are not needed there for this info), as I think that the info originally in this Wikipedia article is absolutely perfect for a WikiVoyage travel guide article like that. Plus, I think that a city of Weston's size is very deserving of one.
Signed,
AITFFan1 (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parks and recreation section edits
Talk:Stars (Canadian band)

message: If a distinction is made between Indie rock and Indie pop, I'd say Stars are closer to Indie pop.
-Their production/sound seems more Pop than normal Indie Rock
-AMG lists "Indie Pop" in their Styles and does not include "Indie Rock" (link)
--Dkordik 11:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd call them a classic borderline case, and somebody will probably revert that down the road. For the record, RS calls them indie rock  and Pitchfork a "pop band that sounds best on a rock equalizer setting" . --Dhartung | Talk 02:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie rock -> Indie pop 

message: There is an alternate cover art for the set yourself on fire album (topless female(?) wearing a pink balaclava, holding a pink molotov cocktail). I am not sure if it is something that was done only in one country, or if it is just the vinyl release of the album, does anyone know anything about this??   —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.251.97.178 (talk • contribs) .
:It's the UK version. Sdalmonte 08:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover Art

message: I love the band too, but the lead paragraph of this article is unnecessarily complimentary. It needs to be fixed. --Masamage 19:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: It looks like some text, especially in the last paragraph of the 'Career' section has been copied from here: . Anybody volunteer to clean it up? -Paul1337 (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some text copied from http://music.aol.ca/article/Stars-side/149/ 

message: There's no mention of the Stars Live DVD packaged with In Our Bedroom After The War, neither here nor on the page for the album. 
DGrayson (talk) 06:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are We Here Yet? (Stars Live) 

message: The external news and media links section is a mess of "me too" links. I propose they be referenced from the article or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperjunk (talk • contribs) 13:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and removed. Editors can find the links in the article history if someone wants to work them in as references.  Strobilus (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links Clean Up
Talk:Plouézec International Meetings

message: Is the Esperanto centre in La-Chaud-de-Fonds mentioned in the article the same thing as the Centre de documentation et d'étude sur la langue internationale, about which a (stubby) article already exists?  If so we should fix the link to point to it (and if someone knows more about the Centre they should expand said stub). --Jim Henry | Talk 15:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esperanto center in La-Chaud-de-Fonds?
Talk:Fecal Matter (band)

message: i've heard that kurt cobain was also in a band called organized confusion before he was in nirvana.
Gringo300 15:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Afaik,Organised Confusion is not a band, is the title of a demo Cobain recorded solo at his Aunt's place during December 1982. See: http://www.livenirvana.com/sessions/home/xmass-1982.php . noctrun 16:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Organized Confusion

message: I think that more should written on this page about the importance of the fecal matter demo--afterall, if it wasn't for this tape/demo, Nirvana may never have been formed. I can add what I know, and I probably will but just putting in a request. In fact, maybe the Fecal Matter demo tape and the Fecal Matter band should have 2 seperate pagesFlyerhell 00:09, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Make sure the article on the demo is Illiteracy Will Prevail as that is the title of the demo. See the cover on the first page of the With the Lights Out booklet. noctrun 20:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical importance

message: I tried to edit this article, but I realized that I need to check my on-hand sources first. In the meantime, I referred this article for cleanup. The historical significance of one of Kurt Cobain's first bands requires a more detailed piece.--Pinko1977 23:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: "Fecal Matter disbanded in 1986 with Buzz Osborne on bass and Mike Dillard on drums."  This is very oddly put-- does it mean "In 1986, Fecal Matter added Buzz Osborne on bass and Mike Dillard on drums, but disbanded shortly thereafter"?  -- Mwanner | Talk 01:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An odd way to disband-- 

message: I think it's about time we gave this article some sort of protection from vandalism. All it takes is a quick look at the article history and you'll see that most of the edits are simply vandalism. I suggest we prevent unregistered users from editing the article, at the very least. I also plan on removing this article's disambiguation link on feces. Thoughts? ~Asarlaí 15:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article protection? 

message: 1986- 12?, 2005-11?, 2007-12? Mistake or future plans.......It's all a bunch of Fecal Matter.Kfcfm (talk) 04:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with the Time Line? 

message: Where are the track listing and times from? There's no source, and it definitely doesn't match what's actually written on the cassete. Seltaeb Eht (talk) 01:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing
Talk:Knotted cord

message: This article contains much information irrelevant to Knotted cords. It needs to be tidied up accordingly. Ian Cairns 21:49, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Were knotted cords used solely by surveyers in Egypt or did other suveyers of other cultures also use knotted cords as basic instruments for measuring distance before metal working made surveyer's chains practical?  The article seems to say only Egypt used these but it may be speaking about ones specifically calibrated in egyptian units of length. RJFJR 20:32, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Knotted cords were used by many ancient cultures. The Greek schoenus is refered to as a rope used to measure land. Ropes generally became cables and chains with Pythagorus making the Greek agros a chain of 10 stadia equal to a nautical mile c 540 BC. The Romans used a waxed cord for measuring distances, [roman cord]
One of the more interesting uses of a knotted cord was to lay out a 3 4 5 triangle to make the corner of a field or building foundation sqaure. Rktect 16:03, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other cultures 

message: Was banned in October 2005 from artices dealing with weights and measures - see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rktect. He comes back from time to time with socks. Dougweller (talk) 07:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rktect 

message: I was a little worried when I saw that the only reference was to an unsourced article on a popular website. According to Eli Maor's The Pythagorean Theorem, pp. 14-15, the story that the Egyptians engineers used a cord knotted into a 3-4-5 triangle (which this article doesn't quite say) is a myth. Are there sources for the rest of the claims in this article? Allispaul (talk) 19:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The whole area of pyramids and wonderful Ancient knowledge is flaky. Other articles like Mathematics and art and Mathematics and architecture are now more carefully cited and fact-checked. Probably the article needs a thorough overhaul; anything unreliably cited or uncited is suspect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was created by a fringe editor who was one of the few editors I know of to have been indefinitely blocked for original research. His socks pop up from time to time. So it probably needs the thorough article suggested although most of his original edits are gone. I must take a look at the others he created. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-4-5 triangle a myth?
Talk:Politics of China (disambiguation)

message: This article was semiprotected during the career of a banned user who has now apparently been inactive for well over a year.  I would like to hear opinions from regular editors on whether semiprotection can now be lifted.  I have also contacted the protecting sysops,  and .
--TS 16:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's positively no reason to keep the protection on. I removed it. Grandmasterka 17:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Semiprotection review