lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Duke of Beaufort

message: Hi!  The Worcester Park page refers to the "apppointment" of "the Earl of Worcester" in 1660 as the origin of the name.  There is a reference to support this, but I don't understand how this fits into the dates given here.  Can someone who knows more about the issue shed some light on the matter?
Thanks, --Slashme 05:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He was appointed Keeper of the Great Park in 1606. I've amended the article. Proteus (Talk) 11:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Worcester Park date

message: This may not be the place to raise this, but it has been advanced that the Dukes of Beaufort, who purport descnt in the male-line from John of Gaunt (son of Edward III), might not actually be so due to possible infidelity somewhere in their line, as their DNA did not match that of Richard III. Richard III is also supposed to be descended from Edward III in male-line, via his son Edmund of Langley. However, it was long-rumored that Edmund of Langley's second son Richard of Conisburgh was illegitimate (his real father possibly being John Holland), which would make the entire Yorkist line not actually Plantagenet (though, of note, that would not affect their claim to the throne, which derives through a senior female line via Edward III's second son Lionel of Antwerp, who's great-granddaughter and heiress married the aforementioned Richard of Conisburgh). Thus, it would not match up with any male-line descendants of John of Gaunt, who are actually blood Plantagenets. Am I wrong and just fatally ignorant of how DNA works? Or am I the only one seeing this? CardinalBonaparte (talk) 02:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard III Y-chromosome/possible Beaufort infidelity
Talk:Dimitri Mitropoulos (musician)

message: Je lis l'article consacré à Mitropoulos.
Il omet de dire que c'est grâce à mon grand-père Armand Marsick que Mitropoulos a fait sa carrière. C'est Armand Marsick qui le forme à Atgènes, l'emmène en voyage à travers l'Europe... Il devait tout à Armand Marsick. Mais il s'est montré particulièrement ingrat! Mon grand-père était très amer...  
Armand Marsick a dominé le conservatoire d'Athènes de 1908 à 1922: c'est lui qui le réforme entièrement et en fait un conservatoire organisé sur le modèle du Conservatoire de Paris, avant d'en devenir le directeur. Pendant toute cette période, c'est lui qui organise et dirige l'orchestre symphonique d'Athènes. Et donc, Mitropoulos a pu entendre non seulement un large répertoire mais aussi tous les grands artistes de l'époque qui ont fait le voyage d'Athènes. Mais, curieusement, on ne cite presque jamais le rôle essentiel joué par Armand Marsick dans l'éducation musicale de Mitropoulos. 
J'espère que vous pourrez rectifier cette biographie et rendre à mon grand-père l'honneur qu'il mérite.
Jacques Marsick
30, rue Jasmin
47520 Le Passage
France
:05:31, 1 December 2005 User:86.196.148.87
*Google translation from French of the above by Anthony Appleyard (talk) at 05:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please make a correction
Talk:Rex the Wonder Dog

message: Can we please add a mention of the possible appearance by Rex in the 2005-Day of Vengeance mini series?69.113.35.24 05:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day of Vengeance 

message: I'm disturbed by the use of 'owner' for a sentient being. Yes, Rex is fictional, but he's a fictional -sentient- being. Owner just sits wrong. Would anyone mind if I edited out the instances of those words? 
P.S. I also added Day of Vengeance appereance details. Lots42 13:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner 

message: Complete to date. 
Thought I'd do this one 'Because a dog's for life, not just Christmas', and he's one of my earliest favourite characters.
The above comments were all taken into account. Now if someone wants to handle the image issue ...
Archiveangel (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-edit December 2009 

message: any relation to Streak the Wonder Dog, a supporting character in later issues of the golden Age Green Lantern comic book 1948/49?
see appearances from Mike's Newsstand
Streak was also created by Bob Kanigher and Alex Toth and appeared to be German Shepherd albeit brown
J Edward Malone (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Streak the Wonder Dog
File talk:Autopsy of a Japanese victim killed in the Jinan Incident.jpg

message: Chinese and Western sources I got from my library use this photo as the vivisection example. They made no mention that it was a japanese corpse lying on the table. Googling reveals only around five links had "山東省動乱記念写真帖" as the source. Care to explain? Stop orphaning images. --Waliwali
As I said before, the principle of the benefit of the doubt should be applied. There are many propaganda photos by Chinese that have wrong captions, are trimmed to mislead people, or are even manipulated. We have to suspect these photo by default. If you disagree with me, show me the "true" source. Who? When? Where? What? Why? See also . --Nanshu 00:55, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. You listed the list of books calling it "vivisection". Then what supports your claim? Photos don't tell enough. It's easy to mislead people with wrong captions. --Nanshu 23:06, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Formula Student

message: The article FSUK is the same thing as the article Formula Student. FSUK is a not an oficial or common name for Formula Student so I suggest FSUK is merged into Formula Student then either deleted of redirected to Formula Student.
I have now merged all of FSUK into Formula Student and think FSUK can now be deleted.
- good idea  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.132.114 (talk) 16:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[FSUK]] into [[Formula Student]] 

message: Wasn't this years class 3 winner Delft University of Technology instead of Eindhoven (which ended 39th)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codegrinder (talk • contribs) 13:30, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 3 winner 2008
Talk:NEC SX

message: Some things here -- especially in the table titled "Multi-node SX systems" -- seem to be inconsistent with the current content of the article at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Simulator>.  In particular, the other article states that the original ES was based on SX-6 and had 640 nodes, whereas the table "here" states a maximum of 128 nodes for SX-6.  Similarly, the ES article states 5120 nodes (apparently *not* a typo, i.e. an extra zero at the end) for the (SX-ACE)-based ES3, but the table "here" states a max. of 512 nodes per SX-ACE supercomputer.
Abe149 (talk) 01:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  inconsistency? 

message: It'd be great to have the introduction dates of the different models -- an encyclopedia is supposed to be a reference book. Jec (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: This article needs to be updated to reflect the newly announced SX-ACE (formerly known as SX-10.) I can do some of the updating once I get back from SC13. 75.70.53.216 (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SX-ACE
Talk:R v Khan

message: 99.234.161.70 (talk) 04:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question!    I am that 3 year old female.   I still an not clear on what was handed down to him. T  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.27.99 (talk) 16:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: same point from a different, and more wikipedian, perspective. the omission of the result of the second trial has to be seen, by any but the most disinterested reader, as a serious flaw in the article. as an american, i also find the apparent violation of what our legal system calls double jeopardy to be particularly interesting.Toyokuni3 (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Nguyen Tuong Van/to do

message: * Pleas for Clemency from UN and their response
* Pleas for Clemency from the Pope and their response
* Proposal by some Australian politicians for economic sanctions
* Coverage of the issue by Singapore media
* Dissent in Australian parliament about pleas for clemency
* The firm resolve of the Singapore Parliament to make an example of this case as a warning to othersSoftgrow 05:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:R v Marshall

message: Although it's not needed yet, with some expansion both decisions would probably be worth individual articles. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation 

message: This article could do with additional references, but also references that expand beyond the commentary provided by Cameron. As a crown lawyer, Cameron's expertise should be (and is) recognized. But it should also recognize that an inherent bias may exist in Cameron's views against the Court's ruling, and should therefore include opposing views. I eat BC Fish (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made the article more balanced by removing most of the Alex Cameron material and adding some from the other camp.  The article was definitely violating NPOV by citing Alex Cameron so extensively while not citing anyone else. Communpedia Tribal (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance of bias in article 

message: I have recently created a page on the events in the 2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute in Nova Scotia - relating to this article. I was hoping to have some more editors familiar with the subject take a look. CaffeinAddict (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute
Talk:Regional Municipality of Durham

message: If anyone's interested, please comment on the message I left at Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/discussion#Mass-move of Ontario Regional Municipality pages. Thanks. --Qviri 06:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to [[Regional Municipality of Durham, Ontario]] 

message: There is a request to move Durham (disambiguation) to Durham;  see Talk:Durham#Requested move.  --Una Smith (talk) 03:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durham page move 

message: The usage of "Durham" is under discussion, see talk:Durham (disambiguation) -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 06:56, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "[[Durham]]"
Talk:Regional Municipality of Niagara

message: If anyone's interested, please comment on the message I left at Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/discussion#Mass-move of Ontario Regional Municipality pages. Thanks. --Qviri 06:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to [[Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario]] 

message: Hey,
if anyone has any ideas as to what kind of material would go in this article and what should be in Niagara Peninsula instead, you're more than welcome to share them.
The Peninsula article already has some history in it. I think it is well-suited there, but I don't believe this article should be just a cold demographics article... After all, Regional Niagara is a very much living organism. --Qviri 01:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mountain is more of a Hamilton thing, really. Might have spread to Grimsby, but I don't think it's popular in St. Catharines. May two-four is pretty universal in Ontario these days. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.109.173.23 (talk) 22:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what goes here? what goes in [[Niagara Peninsula]]? 

message: The area that is now called the Regional Municipality of Niagara is renowned in Canada for its history. So where is it? Life didn't start in 1970. This is an encyclopedia. Expand!
All wikipedia articles covering this region are incomplete.
--Oldontarian (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to history? 
Talk:Jewish symbolism

message: Isn't fire a really big Jewish symbol?
:Not more than water. JFW | T@lk 08:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 13 is associated with worship of God, although I don't know why. I've read it in several Jewish writings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zib Blooog (talk • contribs) 01:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Thirteen Attributes of Mercy are recited on holy days. Also, Yigdal lists Rambam's 13 principles of faith. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 

message: The first section "Shabbat and circumcision" doesn't mention anything about circumcision.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.33.18.10 (talk) 06:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No circumcision info 

message: Footnote 10 re gold appears to have an error.  It references Daniel xi. 21.  But v. 21 doesn't mention gold.  Perhaps they meant v. 8?  I checked a Christian one also just to be sure but for that chapter at least the verses and such are the same.
https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16494https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11&version=KJV
 Spockvondeutschland (talk) 07:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to gold in Daniel
Talk:Charlotte Forten Grimké

message: Was Charlotte not active enough to be included in this category?  Do we need to beef up that section of the acticle?  Is the category itself questionable?  Please explain the removal, and let's talk.  WBardwin 06:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil Rights Activist

message: In every source I researched I found Charlotte's name to include the initial "L."; most often as "Charlotte L. Forten". Her effect on the very early consciousness of civil rights was critical. Michael David 19:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The "L."

message: I just spent a chunk of time doing my best to unscramble all of the confusing name references I spotted. Yikes -- I hope I got it all right! :)  I do wish people would spend a bit of time reading over what they've written using the Preview function, and catching stuff like that before making it permanent. Of course, this particular article presented more problems than most, due to the complicated family structure and inter-relationships -- so it probably would have been a good idea to test things out for clarity on a second party before posting to WP. Cgingoung ld 17:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name confusion

message: Why is this still labeled a Start Class article? RLS (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start class?
Talk:Abutment

message: This page is  a Disambiguation page with topics from other disciplines such as Mathematics and Dentistry added. I tried to clean it up but an expert needs to assess it using Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) for guidance. Sincerely, Mattisse 19:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: As I found this article on 9/11/09, it included 3 sections: "Bridge Abutments", "Other Civil Engineering Applications of Abutments", and "Abutments in Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry".
That structure seems sound to me. I'm a firm believer in the idea that when a person is puzzled by a word they encounter on the web, typing that word plus "wiki" should get them help. So I'm not big on disambiguating the civil engineering and the dental senses of abutment, though I wouldn't cut off my nose in protest if someone insisted on doing so, provided that they left a "disambiguation" trail.
As I found the article, one dental photo was in the "Bridge Abutments" section and another was in the "Other Civil Engineering Applications of Abutments" section, and none were in the "Abutments in Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry". 
How this happened I'll not worry over. The dental photos look to me like the work of a contributor whose dental expertise is a major asset to wikipedia. 
I've moved those photos into the dental section and made no other changes, and my thanks to the contributor of those photos, I hope my edit preserves your intent.
Douglas Barber (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dental Images in Abutment Article 

message: Under the heading Civil the text reads "An abutment supports the ends of a bridge superstructure."Although this is grammatically incorrect (an abutment supports one end of a bridge superstructure) the statement is essentially correct, though unsourced. However, in the accompanying diagram the parts labelled abutments are in fact cutwaters at the base of the bridge's piers and not abutments at all! —MegaPedant 13:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have engineering references to document the difference; and will expand this article with appropriate reference citations and links to the pier (architecture) article.Thewellman (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge abutments 

message: I'm removing the "pop culture" section from this article, because it does not add any useful information or context. It's just two times the word "abutment" was said in movies. This is minutiae at best. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pop culture" section 

message: Abutments 2607:FEA8:2AE0:6650:159C:A0E3:C5DB:7F84 (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arch bridge
Talk:Japanese military modernization of 1868–1931

message: The article states "The modernization of the Japanese army and navy during the Meiji period (1868-1912) and until the Mukden Incident (1931) was carried out by the newly founded national government, a military leadership that was only responsible to the Emperor and the help of French, English and Prussian military advisors."  That's what I believed but the article "Imperial Japanese Army" states that "The Imperial Japanese Army was initially developed with the assistance of American (post Civil War), then French and finally by German advisors (post Franco-Prussian War)...".  For consistancies sake - should either be corrected.Peter Rehse 06:36, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, both articles are right the way they are. There were military officers as o-yatoi gaikokujin from all four nations. In the army, first the French and then the Germans were the most influential, in the navy, most of the advisors were British. So the army article doesn't mention the British, because they were mostly in the navy, and the modernization article doesn't mention the Americans because in 1868 they were mostly replaced by French. -- Mkill 00:37, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  So which is it? 

message: Why did the creator of this page decide to stop at the Mukden Incident (1931), and not go into the late 1930's and early 40's(basically pre-World War II)? Samtree121 (talk) 17:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Content 

message: I am considering adding more to the 1900-1930 part of the page, as well as exploring into properly citing some of the information on this page. There is a lot of information without sources. Samtree121 (talk) 17:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Revisions
Talk:Jeff Mangum

message: Not a notable enough project on its own; should just be covered as part of Jeff Mangum’s main page Dronebogus (talk) 19:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per above. DMT biscuit (talk) 20:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Support as well. Tundraski (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Support surprised it hasn't been merged yet. SlackingViceroy (talk) 00:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Support surprised here, too. Ray Radlein (talk) 08:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Support Seems like the approriate target article, not notable enough for standalone article. Since the consensus is unanimous someone could probably go ahead and merge now.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 01:05, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Korena Pang]] into [[Jeff Mangum]]
Talk:Wide Right I

message: ---------------
The Miami Muff-
Miami's failed kick fit perfectly into the field goal saga between Miami and Florida State. It was labeled the Miami Muff by media outlets and Seminole fans alike.   
Here are some sources which reference the "Miami Muff". The first is a Miami media source, the second is a Tallahassee media source. 
[]
www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/ sports/columnists/randy_beard/12569362.htm
-----
Wide Right IV was removed because it was not game deciding like the others. After FSU missed the field goal they ended up getting the ball back and had another chance to win the game.
*I reinserted it.  The exact timing of the kick isn't the only relevant portion to the outcome.  The Miami Herald and South Florida Sun-Sentinel both dubbed it "Wide Right IV" and there are many other sources as well.  A simple google search will confirm it.  AriGold 14:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Consonance and dissonance

message: https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Consonance_and_dissonance|Dissonants .. really dissonants should redirect here. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to raise this matter at WP:RFD. Toccata quarta (talk) 06:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 400 page views a day vs 5

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Structural dissonance and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Structural dissonance until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234 kb of .rar files (is this dangerous?) 14:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Structural dissonance" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dee Brown (basketball, born 1984)

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 03:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: Some sections can use additional detail, but this page has come a long way since it required cleanup.  It is time to take down the tag.  (Terryn3 04:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag
Talk:Special Herbs, Vols. 9 & 0

message: #Someone added a cleanup notice.. what needs to be cleaned up? -WindFish 07:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Chalmers University of Technology

message: I was just wondering if this is worth mentioning that Chalmers and KTH have decided to bar Iranian and North Korean students from attending? Norum (talk) 01:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iranian students barred from Chalmers. 

message: Can Chalmers really be considered a "private university"? Although the university is owned by a foundation, the foundation itself is controlled by the government of Sweden which, according to the regulations of the Chalmers foundation, appoints a majority of the board members. Government funding also accounts for two thirds of the revenue. /194.103.205.27 (talk) 07:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Private university"? 

message: According to T.I.M.E. Association Membership List Chalmers is no longer affiliated with T.I.M.E.
I assume that it's correct to remove that affiliation. --Emilhem (talk) 10:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliations 