Talk:Gas kinetics

message: This page infrige my copyright and it was done by user  EMBaero.
There are several terms that are doing the same.
This is reply to Mr. EMBaero,
this mr. EMBaero statements.
'Please be my guest if you
want to file a dispute - I am not afraid to bring these issues before an
administrator.
To me, it just looks like you took some of the old compressible flow books
and copied the equations from them. If those equations are copied from any
of the compressible flow authors that I know, I will tell them to pursue
plagiarism charges. Judging from what else Google brings up about you, I
know you are no stranger to lawsuits.'''
This is my reply
While you claim that I plagiarized many books (thousand, I assume),
you manged to infringe my copyrights.
You can notice the several terms in Wikipodia are replica or
derivatives of and from my book (see for example the term: gas
dynamics).
----
my:
The main difference between compressible flow and almost
incompressible flow is not the fact that compressibility has to
be considered.
Rather, the difference is in two phenomena that
do not exist in incompressible flow.\\
and more statements.
----
Wikipodia
The unique aspects of gas dynamics include two phenomena that do not
appear in other branches of fluid mechanics. These phenomena are waves
(normal shocks , oblique shock and expansion waves) and choking flow
(isentropic, isothermal choking). 
and more similar statements
----
By the way, do you know that this is my original idea to explain
the uniqueness of compressible flow?
Do you think that it is appropriate to use my material and remove
all reference to my book.
Or you simply believe that you can hide, and no one can do anything
about it.
Maybe the copyright law does not applied to you as it apply to others
especially for me?
potto (talk) 19:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright dispute 

message: The terms Gasdynamics and Compressible flow are synonymous and is often used interchangeably. Therefore, it is a good idea to merge the article on Gasdynamics with Compressible flow page and redirect gasdynamics page to compressible flow. At present both the articles are not in godd shape and need a thorough rewrite. A. Salih (talk) 15:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gas Dynamics (Gasdynamics) Vs Compressible Flow 

message: As correctly pointed out by A. Salih 6 years ago, these terms are synonymous.  A merger notice has been added to both pages pointing here for discussion. Moreover, both articles currently fail to provide a proper encyclopedia-style overview of the topic for the general literate reader.  Two colleagues and I will attempt to do that, and to illustrate the resulting article with images and necessary diagrams, many of which are already available on Wikimedia.  Discussion is welcome. Gary Settles 02:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of Gas dynamics and Compressible flow 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gas kinetics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071225144547/http://www.adl.gatech.edu/classes/gasdyn/gasdyn01.html to http://www.adl.gatech.edu/classes/gasdyn/gasdyn01.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: < This article needs attention from an expert in Physics >
It seeems to this reader that it needs attention first fron an expert in plain ordinary English.
Why is the article 'Gas kinetics'? The word 'kinetics' appears exactly twice, once in the title and once as the second word in the lede.
86.130.154.119 (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs attention