Talk:Reconnaissance satellite

message: "No consensus?" There were three "pro" votes and two "nay" votes on the topic of renaming. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 14:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and one of the "pro" votes was only weakly in favour, plus "use common names" seemed to be in favour of the current name. —Nightstallion (?) 14:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Can someone expand on the Satellite surveillance aspects? Especiall in reguards to privacy concerns and military operations? 134.193.94.173 19:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Satellite surveillance

message: * Chronology of reconnaissance satellites --190.39.135.131 02:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link removed 

message: It had previously stated that some people regard the term spy satellite in a negative sense... I changed the wording to that it was preferred to be called reconnaisance satellite by some, I felt that the version that stated spy satellite carried a negative connotation was a very one-sided opinion that would be argued by many if not everyone... I dont really think that anyone EXCEPT the governments that employ them regard the term "spy satellite" as offensive or unsavory... To the majority (and to wikipedia's standard of neutrality) spy satellite is just another item to study and learn about, not to label as being something negative.  Realistically THEY ARE USED TO SPY, so "spy satellite" is a very apt term.  I've never heard of reconnaisance that wasn't absorbed as intelligence. Species2112 04:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the wording on the sentence regarding the name 

message: CARTOSAT -2 has been mentioned as India's spy satetllite. Are there any links to support this statements?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.75.198.15 (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian spy satellite 

message: For what it's worth, a huge amount of intelligence is gathered from commercial sources. Are you suggesting that commercially-available imaging products are "spy satellites"? That seems a bit harsh. ... aa:talk 22:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming conventions 

message: At present this article is undefined, no source is used to explain the term, instead we have a personal interpretation and amplification, followed by some cherry picking of sources and half explored issues.  Does anyone have anyhting that defines this?
ALR (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: The article seems extremely focused on US spy satellite in terms of its examples (with only one mention of a Soviet one). In particular, the history section only deals with the US side. It might be better to have more information on the parallel development of Soviet and US satellites, as well as other countries' catching up. -Kieran (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize tag -- very United States-centric article 

message: The title Spy Satellite directs to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_satellite, there is no info given about the Indian Spy satellite RISAT, though a separate page exists for RISAT 1 and RISAT 2, they have not been mentioned in the Spy Satellite page. I wish the links for RISAT 1 and RISAT 2 are provided in Spy Satellite page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISAT-2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISAT  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhusudhan27 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the Spy Satellite page there is no information given about the Indian Spy Satellite RISAT 

message: Here are some references that might be useful for those expanding the article, entered as citation templates already:
History of some US satellites:
News story on the history of russian anti-satellite weaponry:
There's quite a good deal of history in this book, but it doesn't focus on the "spy" part much:
Background on some satellite technology:
Other articles covering related topics that may be useful to get references from:
*Lots in :Category:Reconnaissance_satellites and on Template:Rest_of_the_World_Reconnaissance_Satellites
*S.P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia
*Indian Space Research Organisation
*National Reconnaissance Office
*Zircon affair
*Zenit (satellite)
There are also a number of "references" in the "Further reading" section that need to be turned into inline citations. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 01:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for improvement 

message: It is Deep Black: Space Espionage and National Security by William E. Burrows, which is the first really excellent book on the subject. It was used by the CIA for years as introductory reading material for new officers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.85.168 (talk) 20:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The missing book 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Reconnaissance satellite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027181013/http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/ to http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Reconnaissance satellite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920093817/http://aupress.au.af.mil/Books/Erickson/erickson.pdf to http://aupress.au.af.mil/Books/Erickson/erickson.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: In the "United States reconnaissance satellites" dropdown, USA-193 is included but USA 224 is not. Is there a reason for this? I know it is not a thing thats known for sure but..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0w0 catt0s (talk • contribs) 00:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA 224