lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David X. Cohen

message: Cohen is likely responsible for some of the CompSci and Physics jokes on Futurama. I saw this on an interview linked by Slashdot maybe 2 months ago. Calyth 21:55, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  CompSci and Physics jokes 

message: The article claims he changes his middle initial to X, but does not mention a middle name.  If his middle name is X, it should not be followed by a period.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Johnnicholson3 (talk • contribs).
:David X. Cohen (and everybody else) writes it with a period. Technically it's both an initial and a middle name.--Steven X 13:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wondering this as well.  The WGA allows members to join under a name even if it's not the member's legal name. --NEMT (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  middle name 

message: There's no mention here that he used to create assembly code for Apple][ programs when he worked at Brøderbund.--76.191.180.171 (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worked for Brøderbund 

message: Interesting article on David X Cohen and Futurama might be useful to anyone who wants to expand the article. -- Horkana (talk) 14:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I like those animation series.. I am from Finland. I am watch all yours Futurama seasons. Do more Futurama.. Season 8---->> and more.. that is so good :) And greetings also Matt Groening..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiguru12 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  FUTURAMA 
Talk:California State Route 134

message: The fundamental question I would like to ask here is this: What information that is currently or could theoretically be in the Ventura Freeway article that could not be in either the U.S. Route 101 in California or California State Route 134 articles? People keep asserting that there is such information... so what is it? --Rschen7754 20:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fundamental question
Talk:List of law enforcement agencies

message: I am doing a major rewrite and restructure of this article.  For the time being, if you have any suggestions or corrections to make, please post them here so that I can properly include them as I go. Pee Tern (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite in progress 

message: Removed Australian Secret Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) as per striked rational below. On the appropriateness of removing ASIO notice, for example, MI6 or the U.S National Security Agency aren't on the list and they are of likeness to ASIO.
Under Australia the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) is listed which is a foreign intelligence spying service. I would argue this is not a law enforcement agency.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbeardy (talk • contribs) 11:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign Intelligence Gathering 

message: Chinese customs are not called "People's customs", it should be the General Administration of Customs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.64.88.168 (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customs of the People's Republic of China 
Talk:(65407) 2002 RP120

message: The category listing now looks very weird. This is listed as (65407) 2002 RP120 under 2, which cannot be right surely. JohnCastle 22:06, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
If the data is correct, (87269) 2000 OO67 has a larger excentricity than a 2002 RP120. Martinwilke1980 09:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 18, 2005

message: I hereby nominate the excellent Economy of Africa for display on the main page, and for the following reasons:
#The topic is important, and this is probably one of the best encyclopedia articles on it.
#Good graphics
#It meets all established criteria for display as today's featured article
#It shows Wikipedia in a good light -- a serious article on a serious topic (I'm all for celeb articles, but still)
--Zantastik talk 22:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Griselda

message: My name is Gricelda and I never knew that my name had any significance.  I come from Mexican family and my mother's name is Griselda. I learned that "Griselda" is a very adventurous character, and a heroin.  I feel like I'm reading a story about myself! This name that I pocess suits me very well. I am in the USMC, and I was part of Mortuary Affairs in Iraq in the war. I am small in frame but I can handle my own and people that know me are aware of that. I guess I'm a little bit of a tom-boy... There is so much more to me than this. I am not advertising myself, I am merely relating to the name "Griselda" and the stories of that character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.131.85.3 (talk • contribs) at 23:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Gricelda
Talk:KAMA-FM

message: On July 28 this page survived a VfD. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/KPTY-FM. Redwolf24 23:06, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ruvuma Region

message: "The most educated is the Wanyasa from Mbamba Bay along Lake Nyasa, especially from Linda Village."
Oooookayyyyyyy then. Not sure if I should remove this or not; I'd feel bad removing something (even something biased and slightly silly) from a stub article, especially as I've nothing to add in its place. --Spudtater 23:17, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:TNA Sacrifice

message: Should the fact that TNA Sacrifice will kick off TNA's broadcast in Australia? OrtonFan2006 04:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AUS Info 

message: Requests for citations have been added - one per show (so that the whole page isn't flustered by tags). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cat attack quack (talk • contribs) 02:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You would know if you actually read the edit summaries. 1)"beat the hell out of" is POV, and the incident isn't really that notable anyways. TJ Spyke 22:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Match times

message: Is the stuff about the Super X Cup in 2005 and the World X Cup in '06 notable at the top? Just food for thought, if anyone agrees that it's not, i'll delete it. Meepboy (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it notable? 

message: I found the poster on the inDemand website, can someone put it up?
http://cache.indemand.com/shared/prod/82233_l.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.148.200 (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sacrifice 2008 Poster

message: I was just watching tna xpolosion and jeremy borash just announced it will now include petey williams and be for the x division title  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.155.194.23 (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tna X Belt

message: It was reported at the event that he was out so how should it be changed. or was it announced yet?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klrobinson93 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angle out of main event for '08. 

message: It needs more information, at the moment it doesn't make sense. It reads that Kim won a battle royal by climbing a ladder so I assume it's one of those battle royals till 2 people are left kinda deal but I haven't seen the event so I can't change it myself. Tony2Times (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Knockout Match

message: Why Cant 2011's Sacrifice Have Its Own Page? Or Is Someone Too Lazy To Do That? It Has Lots More Build Up To The Matches, Theres More To This Pay-Per-View To What Is On This Page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.102.181 (talk) 03:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Is Sacrifice 2011 On This Page?
Talk:Stutz Motor Car Company

message: How do you pronounce Stutz, I am asking this because I am currently trying to create a spoken article for Carl G. Fisher and an answer would be most helpfulDeyyaz 18:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Would like to propose a link to the following article about Stutz history - Stutz - Classic Car History Smithville 00:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: Can somebody who knows clarify, "DV32 did allow them to their cars with a larger number"?  Trekphiler 02:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity? 

message: The article says
:Stutz was forced to raise money to fund his automobile production, eventually selling the company in 1919 after a falling out with the company's major stockholders, Allen Ryan, who then went bankrupt.
Who were the stockholders and who went bankrupt? Who owned the company after the bankruptcy? AxelBoldt (talk) 05:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: As Perez said, this article combines information about Stutz with the later company unrelated to but named after it. 76.105.131.18 (talk) 05:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflation 

message: https://www.fia.com/list-homologated-wlsr1925-1939-incl-reports
Discuss. 1924, 24 hours 2930 km= 76 mph, which is substantially faster and a few years earlier than the Stutz record.
Greglocock (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  24 hour speed record 

message: Hello,
I recommend that this article be moved/renamed to Stutz Motor Car Company to reflect the correct name of the business. As it is currently titled, the article incorrectly refers to the name of the company as just Stutz Motor Company.
Separately but related, as noted by the August 27, 2015 topic titled "Conflation," I also recommend that the information contained at the end of this article related to a later company called Stutz Motor Car of America be spun off into its own article with a link back to the newly-titled article. These companies are distinctively different operations and only share a name (that was used to create a connection back to the original company).
Does anyone have objections to these changes? Karloor (talk) 16:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article renaming and dividing
Talk:Curonian language

message: I think it would be better to split the article in two: Old Curonian language and Spit Curonian. For the latter the German article is good source. Koryakov Yuri 09:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Added template to that effect. Scant material as of now, but two distinctly separate languages are two distinctly separate languages. -Keinstein (talk) 12:50, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Spit Curonian or New Curonian has been split to Kursenieki#Language. SilkTork ✔Tea time 11:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two articles 

message: There's not enough evidence for Curonian to even begin to "reconstruct a grammar".  That article (nominated for deletion) is a pure flight of fancy and I've deleted the section here that perpetuates it.  --Taivo (talk) 10:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curonian "grammar" 
Talk:Stockpile

message: On July 28th this page was nominated for VfD. The result was No Consensus. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stockpile. Redwolf24 23:45, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Anyone watching this page?  I propose to separate this article according to the different types of stockpile.  Really, the military stockpile, the market stockpile and the bulk materials handling stockpile are not different types of the same thing.  They tend to only share the workd "stockpile".  I propose a disambiguation page, and new pages to each type.  I'm happy to do the work, just looking for objections, ideas, etc?  Bernard S. Jansen 04:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation? 

message: This is how I'm going to do it:
Stockpile remains, in the bulk materials handling context.
Cornering the market is edited to reflect the use of the term stockpile.  A link to this page is provided on the new disambiguation page.
Soil Stockpile is created as a stub article based on the limited info on this page.
Stockpile (military) is created as a stub article based on the info on this page.
A Stockpile (disambiguation) page is created with links to the above uses.
Bernard S. Jansen 03:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Action
Talk:Black Metal (Venom album)

message: This album seems to have a lot of versions (at least, I THINK), that should probably be mentioned. --Eel 23:52, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we please STOP referring to them as a black metal band? Yes, their style, lyrics and stage presence would prove influential to generations of black metal bands, but they are NOT black metal. They're speed metal. End of. Cacodyl 21:04, 13 June 2008 (GMT)
:  --Nappinenä (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Maybe Tomorrow (The Jackson 5 album)

message: "Maybe Tomorrow was the fourth non-Christmas studio album released by The Jackson 5 in 1971."
Am I the only one who has difficulty understanding what exactly "fourth non-Christmas studio album" means? Could someone please clarify this? <KF> 23:57, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
:Maybe Tomorrow is the Jackson 5's fifth LP, but their fourth regular studio LP. Before this release, they put out three regular albums and a Christmas album. Christmas albums aren't considered "regular studio albums". --FuriousFreddy 20:41, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Hoaxes

message: Remove Melchisedek from this list because it is based on the Bible, and therefore according to the statement on this category it should not be mentioned as a hoax, especially since it has official recognition from at least one UN member state, according to the Washington Post.
What about cults based on hoaxes that died out long ago? Don't think anyone would care. I added Glycon, but take it out if you want.
Mjk2357 17:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone had removed my comment, which recommended placing a host of religious materials from various religions in the same category; however, it was obviously a POV comment anyway and I'm not even sure of the truth or falsehood of some of them anyhow. Just setting the record straight, even if belatedly.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 05:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that we should only include "proven" (not necessarily in the legal sense) hoaxes, not merely "possible". "Hoax" is such a charged term that putting something in this category disparages its credibility, disclaimers notwithstanding, and for unproven hoaxes this is just POV-pushing. Djcastel 01:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The Holocaust wasn't a hoax. There's too much evidence showing that it occurred for it to be a hoax. The Bible, Qu'ran, etc. happened so long ago that a lot of the evidence for their truth relies on their words and on the fact that people tell others to believe their words. This does not necessarily mean that they were hoaxes, and if Jesus or Allah were to show more concrete evidence of what they allegedly said they were, I'd probably believe more of it. Same goes for the Buddha, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, Adonai, whomever wrote the Kojiki, Krishna, etc. I'm wasting time by saying this anyhow.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 05:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: Not. Meanwhile, why is the Voynich Manuscript listed here? Garrick92 12:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks for that

message: The article Judo do and his sub-pages list of Judo-do techniques will reach the Category:Wikipedia articles with sourcing issues|Hoax articles, suspected BUT ARE NOT A HOAX so deleting Judo do for G3: Blatant hoax and buried the text of list of Judo-do techniques in the edit history of draft:Judo do is ridiculous!--Aikikai45 (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Judo do]] and his sub-pages [[list of Judo-do techniques]]
Talk:Peso

message: The Peso did not exist in Mexico until 1864, long after the US dollar was created. It was not a model for the US dollar. The dollar was modeled loosely after the Spanish 8 reales coin. The US dollar coin was not popular as international coinage since the Spanish 8 reales was both of finer silver .903 compared to the early 19th century US standard of .892 and weighed more, 27.07 grams compared to the US weight of 26.96 grams. The US later created the "Trade Dollar" for international transactions. It was equal to a Spanish 8 reales coin and only circulated outside the US.
I'm not up for doing a complete article on the Peso but the current one needs help!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.144.168.46 (talk • contribs) 3 August 2005 23:58
: Date and time added from edit history. --Thnidu (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article work

message: This page says that it is incorrect to call the Spanish dollar a peso. The Spanish dollar page agrees. However, the page on Spanish reales says that "piece of eight" is a (mis)translation of Peso de a Ocho. Which is correct? Daibhid C 16:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @Daibhid C 186.12.61.56 (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pieces of eight

message: While the fact that "Peso is now the name of the monetary unit of several former Spanish colonies." is informative, it lacks detail. Although typically outside of the scope of a typical encyclopedia, Wikipedia is unique as this information would be practical and useful.
It would be useful to include the following :
List of nations currently employing a monetary unit named Peso as their primary form of currency
List of nations having previously employed a monetary unit names Peso as their primary currency. But not as a spanish colony. Having adopted a new peso as their currency following independance
The years for which a monetary unit was employed within the nation
I have attempted basic research on the topic, but I lack respectible sources to form a ammendment with.
84.209.84.146 (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for more detail 

message: Talk:Peso
I would like to ask Should Philippines be on the Peso page as all Philippine notes say “Piso”. 
For instance, the 10 philippine peso banknote says “Sampung Piso”
CalEditerILikeTrain (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Philippine]] notification of Friday June 21 2019
Talk:ASAP (band)

message: Shouldn't it be "A.S.A.P."? That's what last.fm says, and a quick Google seems to support it. Some sites go as far as to say it should be "A.S.a.P.": Adrian Smith and Project. --DrBob 18:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Template talk:Cleanup-date

message: There is a problem with the tag... at the bottom of the template. Zer T 00:03, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the problem, and what are you attempting to accomplish?  You replaced the parameter (the date of addition) with the current date, and then you replaced the correct category with an incorrect category.  —Lifeisunfair 00:52, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with the tag

message: Template:Cleanup has been revised recently per discussion on that talk page. I don't know why both templates are protected but this template should be synced to reflect those edits. Please unprotect or an admin should make the appropriate changes. --Bk0 (Talk) 13:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Too bad it's protected, otherwise it would have already been synched up...  which means I agree that this needs to match current standards (standards-matching is something that I like in template series). --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:20, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, the continued unprotected status of the more specific cleanup templates (of the ones I went to the template pages for, anyway) means that this template is the last of the "old style" templates -- the one with the small print at the bottom. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Template:Cleanup has been unprotected. Will someone please unprotect this template as well? --Bk0 (Talk) 00:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  —David Levy 00:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Bk0 (Talk) 00:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sync with Template:Cleanup 

message: URGENT: Someone lost the closing < / noinclude >, which results in the explanatory ... being splattered all over pages. 68.39.174.238 06:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. heqs 07:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: urgent

message: I've re-coded the template using wiki table format. I used Help:Table and its links as a reference guide. Cwolfsheep 00:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite as a WikiTable 

message: I added this, User:Patrick removed it.  It's existence mirrors :Category:Articles for deletion, :Category:All orphaned fairuse images, and similar which exist in addition to month by month categories and that I did not create.  If the category is not restored, this cleanup section of Wikipedia will be indefinitely removed from the category and backlog tracker as the alternative (following all the month categories and summing) is technically prohibitive and adds unnecessarily to the bandwidth requirements of the bot.  Dragons flight 14:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your statistics are nice, but I am not sure the entry on cleanup on that statistics page is worth all the additional clutter in the lists of categories on article pages.--Patrick 00:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:All pages needing cleanup
Talk:Semantic spectrum

message: Please can you state the source for this usage of "semantic spectrum?" Googling for the exact phrase finds plenty of use in the context of linguistics, and, as far as I can see in a few pages of searching, no references in relation to computing in the exact sense the article describes. -- Karada 00:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good question.  I am looking for the source now.  I attended the Semantic Technologies conference in March of 2005 and it was use there a great deal of discussion about it.  Clearly a buzword with the need for a formal definition.  The first reference I can find was at the AAAI 1999 Ontologies Panel.  I will cite that and other references to it. -- Dan McCreary
-----
Shouldnt URLs (Unique/Universal Resource Locator) in this context be URIs (Unique/Universal Resource Identifier)? Zarutian 00:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsectioned edits from 2005–2011

message: See my comments at the talk page of classification scheme (information science), after my bold partial revision of a cranky page rename (not entirely unjustifiable) from 2016. 
By no means is my new name certainly the best choice, but someone who knows more than I do would have to wade in. — MaxEnt 00:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge candidate
Talk:Alternating current motor

message: Is it acceptable to redirect this to Electric motor, since that article has a considerable section on AC motors? The text which was here doesn't seem to add much Salsb 00:21, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
:Copyvio deleted, redir created for now. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:42, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of Nigerians

message: On July 28, this page was nominated for VfD. The result was Keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Nigerians. Redwolf24 00:24, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that several on this list were neither born in Nigeria, nor moved to Nigeria - some may have had Nigerian parents, but that isn't always the case either. gnomelock 19:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually Nigerians? 

message: There are quite a few redlinks on this list, normally lists like this only list people that already have existing articles.. most if not all of the redlinks should be removed until and unless someone decides to create the article at which point it may be re-added. -- œ™ 05:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many redlinks 