lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WAMH

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:WPZE

message: Here's a reminder in case anyone says it's time to move this article from WAMJ to WPZE:
# Please do not do so until FCC officially reveals that this station changes its callsign (i.e. doing a search on WPZE in the FCC database reveals a frequency of 102.5 as opposed to 97.5)
# Please do a "move this page". Please do not cut-and-paste this page's text into WPZE. Georgia guy (talk) 20:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because #2 gets messed up so often, I may have jumped the gun on #1. Both All Access and Radio & Records said the call signs were changed (sometimes the FCC site is slow to update (see WLPR-FM were I moved the station back only to find out it changed call signs in January and the FCC didn't update the site until a month later). The stations, however, are still using the old calls in the legal ID so I may have jumped the gun on the moves. Because the moves were a pain, we should probably give it a couple more days before thinking about undoing the changes. RobDe68 (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What does "jump the gun" mean?? Georgia guy (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Made the changes too soon. According to the FCC call sign histories (FM Query always takes longer to update for some reason), the WPZE call sign was officially moved to 102.5 and 97.5 was changed to WUMJ on the 20th. It doesn't show 107.5 FM changing to WAMJ yet though. RobDe68 (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:1801 in Australia

message: I'm researching any links between Thomas Jefferson & Lachlan Macquarie in or around 1801 Tomusch2001 (talk) 22:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any evidence of link between Thomas Jefferson & Lachlan Macquarie in or around 1801? Tomusch2001 (talk) 23:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm researching for links between Sydney settlement & Virginian settlement(USA) in 1801
Talk:Net lease

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 01:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-05-21 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I tried to clean things up a bit in the process of merging the content from triple net lease into this article.  I'm not a real estate expert, so I apologize in advance for any errors I may have introduced. There are a few things in the original that seem questionable or contradictory (like a "customary rate" for roof repair reserves -- this has got to vary widely worldwide!); hopefully someone with more knowledge of the area can clean it up further. Speight 01:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged with triple net lease
Talk:WOR (AM)

message: Magician James Randi, in his SWIFT Newsletter of 22 June 2007 , mentioned his appearing on WOR when it had a 100,000-watt signal.  It would be nice to have a timeline of the station's wattage.  Also, according to Randi, he took over Long John Nebel's time slot for "almost two years", so he should be among the "noted personalities" listed here.
The history of WOR should include its first airing of "The Voice of Experience"  (M. Sayle Taylor) who ran an advise program in 1932.  It drew thousands of letters and was so successful that the "VOICE" switched to CBS in 1933 and went to NBC in 1936. Returned to WOR and the Mutual network in 1937. The VOICE left the air in 1939.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.249.116.162 (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wattage; Randi 

message: Richard Buckley died this weekend - he ran Buckley Radio, the owner of WOR since he inherited the station from his father.
I'm amazed to find this article has none of the history of the RKO General purchase of the station in the 1950s and how Howard Hughes was forced to divest the station in the early 1980s over "character issues" - which explains how a small radio owner in Connecticut wound up owning a major market AM radio station, making it distinct from the other stations in the New York metro market.   In the encyclopaedic scheme of things, that chapter of radio history stands out as being a turning point in the rules of radio ownership and the power of the government to punish media operations it dislikes.
108.82.248.203 (talk) 02:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't Howard Hughes die in 1976? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 03:27, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RKO General ownership
Talk:Puzzle Quest: Galactrix

message: Originally, the article said that the gameplay is based on Hexic, but that's not right, because sections of tiles are rotated to make matches in Hexic. Likewise, it's not Collapse, as the (now fairly old) Gamespot article said; Collapse is built around simply selecting large groups of like-colored squares to make them disappear. Near as I can tell, tiles are still swapped one-for-one as in Bejewelled and the first Puzzle Quest, but their shape allows for six swapping directions (Up, Down, Up-Right, Up-Left, Down-Right, Down-Left). If any new information's come out recently that says otherwise, though, let me know. Max22 (talk) 07:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core Mechanic 

message: Been playing the online demo for  quite awhile. This image shows what happens when the computer opponent no longer has a move. What will happen in the final game if there are 'no moves left'? In 'Quest of the Warlords' the 'Gems' would reset by clearing the entire board. This image shows the glitch. Please comment how you think this should be resolved.
Image: http://lugoves.com/blog1/images/galactrix.bmp
<img alt="galactrix.bmp" src="http://lugoves.com/blog1/images/galactrix.bmp" width="788" height="445" />|Game Frozen
--Lugoves (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Need to wait for a reliable source to comment on this. If it is in the final game, I'm sure someone will pick up on that. --MASEM (t) 19:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Bug in New Galactrix Puzzle Quest
Talk:Afflecks

message: Affleck's posted a bulletin on using their MySpace account, "Just a quick note to say contrary to rumour we will not be closing on the 19th of January.". I could link to it, but it is only visible to people who are MySpace "friends" with Affleck's. Also, it will expire on the 22nd, 10 days after it was posted. How can I cite something like this? I have saved a copy of it (File->Save Page As...), if that's any use. boffy_b (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Social networking sites such as Myspace are not regarded as reliable sources.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to cite a MySpace bulletin? 

message: Affleck's Palace closed on the 26th January
:Can anyone cite this? All the sites I can find are just talking about it closing "soon". boffy_b (talk) 04:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I shopped there last Wednesday (30th) so this certainly isn't true. -- Fursday 03:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definately not true. Source is The Manchester Evening News Fallen-Griever (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed? 

message: Are the spellings Afflecks and Afflecks Palace correct? Affleck's Palace could have been used in 1981 since the building was once Affleck & Brown's store.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spellings 

message: My memory is that Affleck's Palace originally opened in the former Affleck & Brown's store on Oldham Street; circa 1985-90 it moved to its current location, which is not A&B's place.  If my memory is right, the current wording would not be accurate. Anyone know?  Mr Stephen (talk) 09:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affleck & Brown 

message: Is anyone able to get any details on the looting taking place in Manchester, and reliable sources for the reports that this has been targeted? Sunyavadin (talk) 23:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riots 
Talk:Hydraulic hooklift hoist

message: While weights are important for dense cargoes, volume is more important for light cargoes.   Information on max sizes of hooklift skips/containers would be a useful addition to this article.   For instance I read this article because I'm interested in particularly long hooklift containers for quickly located temporary housing.   If hooklift containers can be mounted on / operate from 40' semi trailers it would be useful for my application, but there is no information here about hooklift operation on semitrailers (or why hooklift can not operate from semitrailers).   I hope that someone in the know can add to this article. 86.146.201.20 (talk) 11:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Container lengths
Talk:History of the Chicago Cubs

message: This piece is an enormous, rambling, mostly unsourced mess of an article. I would advise that the 19th Century, 20th Century history up to World War II, and Post-WWII history be split off as freestanding articles and written from scratch with sources, and that the main page then be rewritten to accord with those. This will be a very high traffic page because of the World Series so the time is not now, but something like this needs to be done before too much longer... Carrite (talk) 16:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This piece needs a full rewrite

message: I'd like to know before I add an addendum to that effect if any other known sports team in history has ever pulled that off. Obviously any team gets at most one shot at such a feat (with teams that start out barnstorming getting zero). -Tawaki (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My search came up empty save for this article from Sports Illustrated. To make a claim that "The [Cubs] were the first team in known sports history to win a championship in their inaugural season in a preexisting league"  would require a reliable source and reference to back up it up. Maybe someone else can find a more definitive answer.--  StarScream1007  ►Talk   01:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The feat of a brand new team in its inaugural season winning a preexisting league's pennant
Talk:Nathan Coley

message: Unreferenced tag removed, because the article is not unreferenced. The stub tag automatically indicates that the article needs expansion, so the expand tag is not necessary and I have removed it. It is for use in articles which are no longer stubs, but still need expanding. Tyrenius 03:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:Henri Martin affair

message: article is available in the french version, it would be appreciated that someone translates it, thanks. Cliché Online 02:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: translation
Talk:Chicago Road

message: Does anyone know, is this Chicago Road, fka the "Sauk Trail," the same as the "Old Sac Trail"? There is a marker for the Old Sac Trail, placed in 1916 on what is now Lincolnway in Valparaiso, Indiana. Sounds from the article like the Chicago Road / Sauk Trail may have followed what is now US 12, which lies a bit to the north of Valparaiso. Xenophon777 15:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old "Sac" Trail...?
Talk:Neo-Giant

message: There are a few problems here:
1. The term was also used by Mark Hall to Bigfoot from shorter and much taller hominids. There appears to be a word missing just before "Bigfoot", but I can't pin it down. "Distinguish", perhaps?
2. Female tracks usually display smaller toes and rounder heels than males. with only tracks to go on, how do we know which are male and which are female? OK, primate males are bigger than females, but primates don't have hourglass-shaped feet with 3 toes. Looks like there's an assumption being made here.
3. Hall, however, thought they may be Authralopiths such as Paranthropus. Authralopith? Did Hall say Australopithecus or Australopithecine? This is so badly misspelt I can't guess what the correct word is.
Totnesmartin 19:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article
Talk:Zarina Bhimji

message: These have been removed. I don't think it's very good practice to whack tags onto an article 4 minutes after it's been created, especially when they are inaccurate. The article is not unreferenced: it cites its reference inline and there is a "Notes and references" section! It's obvious it needs expanding because it's been marked as a stub - no need to uglify it from the word go, with a tag. I can't see anything that needs cleaning up. Tyrenius 02:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You greatly misunderstand my tagging. It is not to set it up for failure but to insure that it becomes developed. Right now you have a stub - see  for the ideal template for a biography. As I stated, I tagged it so you, or another editor can continue furnishing the article. The goal is to get as many articles on Wikipedia to GA status, I feel - I focus on biographies - rather than have them languish in Stub status.--Ozgod 02:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I never said the article was a failure, I was tagging it now so it does not sit forgotten for those few months. There is no crime in wiki-gnoming nad placing appropriate tags - I can understand your concern over the {unreferenced} tag - but not over the fact I tagged the article and also assigned it the Wikipedia Biography Project. --Ozgod 03:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:1990–91 Calgary Flames season

message: If anyone can find out, what manner the Flames rotated their captaincy and alternate captaincies, during the regular season, that would help. By having watched re-plays of the Flames 1991 Playoffs, the Letters were rotated (gam-by-game). The veterans player who took turns (that've recollected) - Doug Gilmour, Jamie Macoun, Joe Nieuwendyk and Joel Otto. GoodDay 15:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Captains and alternates
Talk:Schlesinger v. Holtzman

message: In the section "Significance", the article states, "This case emphasizes the proper role of the judiciary to refrain from deciding political questions that are for the President and Congress to decide.". As far as I know, there is no universal agreement that the Supreme Court acted  properly by declaring this to be a political question un-judiciable by the court. The fact of the matter is that this was a question that a significant number of Americans at the time felt the Supreme Court should have had the authority to rule on. What the proper role of the judiciary is or isn't is much a matter of debate, and of course varies from country to country. If the argument is that framers intended these matters to be decided by the president and congress, then it should be stated as such, rather then stated as if it is not a controversial question. Even if the framers intended the courts ability to address military actions of the executive branch to be as it currently is, that does not mean that people can disagree with the status quo. The way it is currently worded sounds like a law school textbook rather then a NPOV encyclopedia. --Notcharliechaplin (talk) 14:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV?
Talk:Ricky Lee

message: Yup.  I couldn't believe how short and incomplete this article was on Ricky Lee! Here's one of the best screenplay writers in Philippine movie history and yet the article hardly said anything at all? I'm having a hard time comprehending all the little details and conventions in wiki editing so I'm a bit apprehensive about editing the page. It isn't even named properly! Black Sheep14 (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  agreeing with above comment
Talk:Level E

message: *ANN Winter 2011 anime preview: 1 2 3 4 5 6
*ANN: Ep 01-06 streaming Shelf Life Ep 01-09
*Mania.com streaming: Ep 01 Ep 02 Ep 03 Ep 04 Ep 05 Ep 06 Ep 07 Ep 08 Ep 09 Ep 10 Ep 11 Ep 12 Ep 13
--KrebMarkt (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: No Western officially publication? Wow, then my copy of Planeta DeAgostini "Level E" is an illusion... No, really, it was translated "officially" in Spain & Spanish. I am changing that. --Voj 2005 (talk) 07:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's one of the reasons that I usually remove statements that are based on the lack of evidence that the opposite is true. —Farix (t | c) 12:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western edition 
Talk:Friedrich Wührer

message: Moved from main article:
Aside from references noted in the text, the foregoing draws on Wührer’s entry in the German Wikipedia [] as rendered into English by online translation software and further interpreted by the original editor, relying on his limited "record jacket German."  The original editor is confident that his work is accurate as far as it goes, but revision and extension by one fluent in the original language would be welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drhoehl (talk • contribs) 
Amazon.fr has a 12-CD box of Schubert piano music on the Disques label (about $25!), which includes much of the Wuhrer Vox Schubert cycle. (D. Alt)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFA2:6980:1594:155C:5DBC:DF1 (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Euler number (physics)

message: The top equation is missing a definition for the variable L. It seems strange to leave that ambiguous and with no further explanation.
It does appear to be a length value, as L^2 substitutes "(area)". But unless I missed something, the meaning of "area" in this context is also not clearly defined -- I'm guessing it's some cross-sectional area within a relevant system. but at the very least I think the variable itself should be explicitly defined. Ἐγώ-ςκὀθρ (talk) 09:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined variable in equation
Talk:1909 in Australia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20060628054414/http://www.arrs.net/NC_MaraAUS.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Psychonaut (talk) 11:38, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Psychological resistance

message: Notability of this article has been questions.  This is an essential element of psychoanalysis and other psychotherapies.  I will try to add more later. -- Psy guy Talk 02:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I would suggest the article be renamed "Resistance (psychology)", as its not called psychological resistance, simply resistance. ex. : Transference, not "Psychological transference".Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: — Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
Talk:KQLL

message: This edit:  was made by someone who's only other edit was vandalism. I tried to check the ref but it was down. Leaving a note here in case someone is interested enough to figure out which version is accurate. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error
Talk:Nonantum, Massachusetts

message: Unless they have some global significance, personal friends should not be added to Wikipedia articles.  Repeatedly re-inserting them is just a form of vandalism.
:I'm going to continue reverting the "Josh E. is a total mush" additions until someone gives me a good reason not to here in the comments. Repeatedly reverting a change without justification is vandalism; I've given my justification here. --Jere7my 03:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion page is the place to discuss whether or not "Josh E. is a total mush" should appear in the article.  We shouldn't engage in an edit war without discussing it.  I appreciate that he was a friend of yours, now deceased, and I applaud your desire to honor his memory.  But Wikipedia isn't the place for personal tributes, I'm afraid. --Jere7my 17:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No in-jokes, please 

message: https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/search/commonwealth:gb19g1161  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4103:AE00:E5D6:9A52:ADA9:65D9 (talk) 22:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  flag
Talk:WHOF

message: I added the  template to the external links section of this article back in 2012 with two successive edits. At the time, I was under the impression it was one of the standard external links used for radio station articles -- similar to  (FCC query),  (Arbitron query),  (Radio-Locator profile), etc. However, I've since learned that this template is mostly limited to radio station articles in the Cleveland radio market, and has never been widely adopted by WP:WPRS or the larger WP community. More importantly, this template, which merely links to the transmitter's coordinates on Google Maps, is completely redundant to  in the infobox, a template which has much greater functionality, and is which is nearly universally used in broadcast station articles. As such, I have removed this redundant "Transmitter" template from this article; the template itself is currently nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_10#Template:Transmitter. Please do not hesitate to share any thoughts or concerns you may have, both here and at the deletion discussion.  Levdr1lp / talk 02:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transmitter template
Talk:Lion Books

message: There's no reason for each of these OVA episodes to have their own article.  The articles barely have any content, and it would really help this article to have all that content here; with one strong article rather than multiple weaker ones.  --Kraftlos (talk) 10:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The redirect Adachigahara has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Imaginatorium (talk) 09:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Adachigahara]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Jonathan Livingston Seagull (soundtrack)

message: I've honestly never seen any CD version with a track 13 and 14... maybe someone confused it with a version where The Odyssey was split into 3 tracks? Then the last two tracks (Dear Father #3 and Be #4) are indeed tracks 13 and 14. Since the article doesn't state any references for its track list either, I suggest these last 2 tracks to be removed from the listing. Nyerguds (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track 13 and 14?