lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vasudev Balwant Phadke

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.mediabharti.com/news1/index.php/variety/item/2725-heroes-of-freedom-struggle-vasudev-balwant-phadke. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  StudiesWorld (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: . 103.211.43.255 (talk) 09:18, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tatti
Talk:Activity-based management

message: I just joined the WP:WikiProject Business participants and will add wiki markups and references to this stub. DeWriterMD (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cajal body

message: Support Both this page and Coiled bodies are talking about the same structure.D-rew (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, concur with D-rew. aciel (talk) 19:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, there is definitely no difference between the two. Sojuli (talk) 12:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Support. Is the merger from Coiled bodies to Cajal bodies or the other way around?--Chibibrain (talk) 21:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Support. Personally I would prefer merging it to Cajal body as it sounds more specific to me, and that's what my cell biology textbook (The Cell, 4/e, G. M. Cooper, R. E. Hausman) refers them to. However a Google search returns somewhat more hits for "coiled body" (is this term used more frequently than the other in fields such as medicine?), so whichever would be fine with me... E-Ping Rau (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: 2 micrometers is huge, considering a nucleus is usually 5-10 microns in diameter. any source with a microscopic picture proving that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.229.14.205 (talk) 08:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally accepted is that in somatic cells Cajal bodies are 0.5-1 µm in diameter, but in oocytes (e.g. Xenopus) which have big nuclei, Cajal bodies can be up to 5 µm in diameter. Check for example  --Mashin6 (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size - Ref? 
Talk:Azimullah Khan

message: This article is written in a biased tone. Glaring among this is that Azimullah returned to India with a "dangerous idea" of rebellion. First, he was an Indian and he was pleading for Nana in England. Naturally, he will be on the other side of the British. If this is not corrected suitably, I will correct it shortly.
Second, this book does not take into account the clarity shown in this regard by Mr Parag Tope in his book " Operation red Lotus".  Azimullah's full range of activities in London gets highlighted in that book. Additionally, Azimullah's travels to Turkey and Crimea at the time of the Crimean war is not given here. I may start a new chapter on that. But, make sure that the neutrality and adherence to references are strictly followed. 
Regards
07:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Catabolite activator protein

message: Who ate the interwikilinks? Sakkura 21:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki

message: There's a better image available at the lac Operon page, one that has been retouched and has correct labels and nomenclature. I'd suggest stealing it from there?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.129.81.138 (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline Image 
Talk:Bacterial capsule

message: Stub mostly covered on target page Iztwoz (talk) 11:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Polysaccharide encapsulated bacteria]] 

message: Bacteria dose not have a capsule 103.75.29.179 (talk) 07:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microbiology  

message: Bacteria dose not have a capsule 103.75.29.179 (talk) 07:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microbiology
Talk:Chiasma

message: I would just like to point out that "chiasm" or "chiasmatics" are also terms employed in literary theory and analysis, describing the juxtaposition of adjective and noun in two lines ("... while the Wonderful motionlessly / while the Motionless wonderfully..."). However, I do not know if there is another term in English that is used instead, and thus, I will not add it to this page. Best regards, 130.225.244.206 (talk) 11:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cholecystokinin receptor

message: This page misused "homology".  Proteins are either homologous or they are not.  The better word is "50% identity" or "50% similarity".   John Irwin jji@cgl.ucsf.edu  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.230.90.180 (talk) 19:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chondrocyte

message: Are chondrocytes usually multinucleate or do they usu. just have one? 160.94.27.223 (talk) 03:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Like most cells in the body they only have a single nucleus. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 22:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Articular Chrondrocyte is an orphan, a stub and contains 1 sentace of information.  Either it is edited to form a respecable article or it is merged.  It is helpful to have all of the information on one subject in a page unless some topics are too big for that.  In my opinion, we should merge it anyway for now. Stingray225 (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Merjer complete. If you want to change it, draw data from it, ensure that links go directly to it, etc., then follow this link .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.181.137.200 (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Hindi 223.233.69.214 (talk) 23:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Condrocytes
Talk:José T. Joya

message: I reverted the article to delete copyrighted text from . -sthomson06  (Talk) 20:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert for copyright 

message: Boy 175.176.69.195 (talk) 12:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary arts 

message: Ano ang larangan ni jpsa tanig joya 112.204.244.93 (talk) 10:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Araling panlipunan
Talk:The Amazing Race 10 contestants

message: Although most of the contetants aren't exactly notable, this sounds like a good compromise idea and I would be happy to support it. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 20:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.  I hadn't investigated the level of information available and simply suggested it as a compromise because I have a vague feeling I have seen something similar for another reality tv show.  -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 06:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

text: *Just because there are such articles popping up, doesn't mean that the topic itself is notable. Again, they need to comply with WP:NOT and meet WP:BIO for notability standards.  And for the so-called "popularity" of such articles, like List of Contestants on The Amazing Race, there's only been 10 edits by 4 unique editors and 1 bot over 2+ months.  That itself is a testament to the non-notability of the topic. --Madchester 21:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In each team "profile", should specific information about their participation in the race be included or just biographical-type information?  I ask because I had a strong desire to rever the addition that David & Mary Conley were eliminated because they were "marked for deletion" because I didn't think it was suitable here... but in the end I resisted and thought I'd bring it up here for people to comment on :) -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 06:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information in each "profile"
Talk:Cisterna

message: The article credits M.J. Klute et al. with the information about Golgi stacking.  While Klute addresses the phenomenon, the paper does not contain the information suggested.  Where does this evidence actually come from?  If the eight instances are mentioned, they should probably also be listed or at least adequately cited.
Additionally, what does each of the four classes of cisternae do?  This information is given in the first source, and could benefit the article.
At the current state, the information on cisterna would be helpful at giving a general overview of what cisterna is and the role it plays in the cell.  However, the article does not give an in-depth explanation for as student in an Intro Biology course.  The article could greatly benefit from the additional information suggested and cited, and other citations must be corrected or updated.  As stated by Wikipedia, there seems to be some issues with plagiarism within the article.  Some of the statements reference to the first source seem very close to the original author's wording, which would be against copyright and Wikipedia's guidelines.  The facts could be paraphrased to eliminated plagiarism.  
--Garretson9 (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper Citation, Inadequate Information 

message: This page says "A typical Golgi has anywhere from 3 to 7 cisternae stacked upon each other... but there are usually around 6", but the main page for the Golgi apparatus says "Between five and eight are usually present..."
Apart from the numerical description on this page being somewhat awkward, which range is more accurate?
Alveolate 15:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 3 to 7 and usually 6 is correct. source--my 2007 biology book.  Sentriclecub (talk) 04:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "3 to 7" or "5 to 8" cisternae per apparatus? 

message: The writing is unclear here:
::The formation of new cisternae is often called the cis-Golgi network and at the end of the Golgi where transport to other parts of the cell occurs is called the trans-Golgi network. Both are thought to be specialized cisternae leading in and out of the Golgi apparatus.
Does this mean that the new cisternae are formed at the end of the Golgi?  Or perhaps it means that the newer ones are used at the transport end.  Or perhaps something else?
Stifynsemons (talk) 15:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation of new cisternae 

message: H 2409:4042:E1A:92CE:E7A5:E74C:2818:6469 (talk) 17:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cisternae
Talk:Coenocyte

message: That 'coenocyte' is a term still in regular use is doubtful. Whereas, by contrast, syncytium is a term widely used. Dictionary of Genetics (King et al, p435) discusses syncytium, with no entry for coenocyte. If no or few modern uses of coenocyte can be found, then the page should reflect that. I only have sight of the abstracts, but they are not super-convincing.  Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term still in use? 

message: In my field (algae) the term coenobium refers to a colony of defined cell number (cells can be uni- or multinucleate). This is  distinct from coenocyte, a single large, multinucleate cell.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Algae1fan (talk • contribs) 13:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coenobium and Coenocyte
Talk:Awami National Party

message: Born en 1981 in gujrat  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.235.76.124 (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SHAHBAZ AHAMD BAGRI 

message: Please help by making this article more neutral and confine all discussion here. 174.99.110.64 (talk) 08:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Please help fix this article
Talk:Compartmentalization (biology)

message: Made my laugh seeing the entry for this page, needs complete overhaul.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shevrzl (talk • contribs) 10:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Confluency

message: ==Untitled==
Shouldnt this article be renamed to "confluence"? Im not sure that "confluency" is even a word. (At least not in my Oxford dictionary - Im not english native). --192.38.113.102 12:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confluence 

message: Shouldnt this article be renamed to "confluence"? Im not sure that "confluency" is even a word. (At least not in my Oxford dictionary - Im not english native). --192.38.113.102 12:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree with the above statement; in my textbooks it's called confluence. There's really not much detail here either, stuff needs to be added on determining whether confluence will occur for a certain culture or not too. dreamcatcher23 13:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Communist Mazdoor Kissan Party

message: This article has a section of text which has been copy and pasted from here and there are a number of parts which are basically POV and unreferenced.  Going through and correcting these problems.  Would also note that the infoboxes are cluttering the page and causing the image to display incorrectly.  Not sure if both infoboxes are necessary.--Goldsztajn (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV, copy and pasted material
Talk:Airports of Thailand

message: Years in the original version of this article used Thai Solar Calendar.  They were modified to improve readability to the widest possible audience. LizFlash (talk)
:That bulk of text was apparently inserted by an IP editor a little over year ago. I think the unreadability suggests it was a machine translation, possibly copyvio even. Probably better to just scrap the whole section as it stands and rewrite instead of trying to salvage text from the gibberish. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to the same conclusion after working on it for awhile. I'm not really experienced enough with wikipedia, nor do I know enough about the airports of Thailand, to be the one to scrap the whole section. LizFlash (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai Solar Calendar 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 14:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Airports of Thailand PCL →  – Per WP:NCCORP, "The legal status suffix of a company (such as Inc., plc, LLC, and those in other languages such as GmbH, AG, and S.A.) is not normally included in the article title." This would reverse a 2015 move by User:Seligne, which was done with the rationale, "Confusing title when referring to a public company." However, Airports of Thailand has since continued to redirect to this article. Any confusion should be adequately addressed by the current hatnote. Paul_012 (talk) 13:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2020 

message: Much of the second half of the article is just rehashing the same information that is covered in a better depth in List of airports in Thailand. Much of it also appears to be outside the scope of the article. Rowei99 (talk) 21:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy with [[List of airports in Thailand]]
Talk:Jamhoori Wattan Party

message: This article was relocated by a "cut and paste move" in 2008, which creates a licensing violation because it splits the material from its page history, which is needed for attribution. The article has been moved back to reunite it with its history. If the title "Jamhoori Watan Party" is the preferred, the entire article should be moved together with its edit history. In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. 
I have no opinion on the better title, but have left it here because this spelling has significantly more google hits. I leave it to interested editors to determine if this is misleading. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut & paste moves
Talk:Coulter counter

message: After reading this article, I find the third paragraph to be misleading.  I am speaking specifically about the following sentence: "Its primary function being the quick and accurate analysis of blood cultures."  I have been working in a medical laboratory for two years and have never seen a Coulter Counter used in microbiology (blood culture).  Were you under the impression blood cultures have something to do with complete blood counts?  Counting blood cells is the science of Hematology, and is a whole seperate part of the laboratory from microbiology.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Totoroben (talk • contribs) 01:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reasonable objection.  Changed appropriately. --Elplatt (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: Coulter principle explains how the counter works and should be merged here. It's been tagged for a year but there was no discusion page. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Added some informations for the cited Article "The Coulter Principle: Foundation of an Industry"
see: http://jla.sagepub.com/search/results?fulltext=The+Coulter+Principle%3A+Foundation+of+An+Industry&x=0&y=0&submit=yes&journal_set=spjla&src=selected&andorexactfulltext=and
+193.99.246.4 (talk) 09:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:Pakistan Green Party

message: i live and work in pakistan and in my long years i have never ever heard of a 'green party' here-- where is it registered? what and where is its membership? it doesnt even have a proper website, the link given on the article page doesnt lead anywhere to any party site. is this some sort of elaborate hoax? please give help/guidance any Wikipedia editors? Thanks Hamneto (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: which green party?

message: i want participate in Green party  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.187.117.64 (talk) 11:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skandar Ali s/o Allah Ditta
Talk:Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party

message: The English article having been expanded with all the reliable text from the French article, the Expand French template was removed. 2 new references were also added.Sadenar40000 (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from [[:fr:Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami]], removal of French Expand template and added references
Talk:Cytolysin

message: I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username:LTEMESV) at Clemson University
Qzhou3 (talk) 01:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Analyst relations

message: * The external links section is too long. The rule of thumb is that if a link is already in the article then it does not need to be in the Internal links section. --StuartRijlant (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaints
Talk:Pakistan Awami Tehreek

message: This article has no reputable references, the one that has been presented is not even specific, it just redirects to the Movements own page, and that in itself is bias. I don't really see what this article exists. --  Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  00:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No References, yet again

message: May I suggest to change page name as their official name is written as Pakistan Awami Tehreek instead of Tehrik, for reference please visit their website at PAT.com.pk --Abd-ur-Rahman 09:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in the page name requested 

message: Pakistan electoral system needs to be changed as it is serving only one class that is Political elite. It is constituency based system where Capitalists  , feudal lords and influential people can contest and win election through manoeuvring , pre-poll and post poll  rigging.  This system not serving interest of masses, it is protecting the rights of those Players who invested and then win thier constituencies. Even Political Parties are hostages of these Constituency Players and Parties cant move ahead without thier consent. With this system   positive change can never come even after 100 elections took place.  If we want to bring a change  at very first stage we have to change this rotten electoral  system. Azharawanpat (talk) 05:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan's  Electoral System
Talk:Pakistan Muslim League (F)

message: PML-F Registration Form plz email my id 
1 am join party  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.155.11.183 (talk) 08:53, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's league of suny jamat Sajid Ali (talk) 17:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pml f 
Talk:Dilution cloning

message: This page (Dilution cloning)currently seems a bit befuddled about the difference between single cell isolation and colony outgrowth by serial dilution (multiple dilutions) or limiting dilution (single dilution). There is also the fact that "cloning" kind of implies something being isolated and give rise to an outgrowth colony (i.e. cells). Would it then also apply to molecules like plasmids? Then there is a collision with the use of "cloning" in molecular biology, so I think the cloning terminology should be avoided.  
Given there is already a page on Serial dilution, but not one on Limiting dilution, I propose reworking this page into one on Limiting dilution, and transferring the text, references, & external links currently contained to either Serial dilution or Limiting dilution depending on which technique is actually being used in the sources. Photocyte (talk) 15:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial dilution does not equal limiting dilution
Talk:Endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation

message: Jparcoeur (talk) 13:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

message: Well Yos9p has recently been implicated as recognizing the a1-6 linkage in N-linked glycans of proteins that are then subject to ERAD.  Basically it is thought to be the 'gatekeeper' along with Hrd3 to the Hrd1/Der3 E3 Ub ligase complex. (See Quan et al, 2009)
66.183.56.107 (talk) 07:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi!
Is there a difference between ERAD and EOR (ER overload response)?
--82.113.121.109 (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  difference between ERAD and EOR?
Talk:Enterochromaffin cell

message: Right now, the first sentence is telling who discovered it.
I think that the first sentence should explain what it is.
--109.65.102.56 (talk) 06:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: First sentence
Talk:Ferroportin

message: It is not Fnp1 but Fpn1. See the references.Miguelferig (talk) 16:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Boghog (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fpn1

message: — Assignment last updated by ETstem (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BYU-Biophysics, CELL 568