lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Archery at the 1972 Summer Olympics

message: "Each event was composed of two FITA rounds..."
What does FITA stand for? I don't see an explanation anywhere. --Mihoshi 01:50, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: International Archery Federation.  I've wikilinked it in the article as well. -- Jonel 14:38, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Greater Houston/Archive 1

message: Can someone please replace the image for the area coverage of this metropolitan area? I do not know how to do it nor do I know where to get the image. As of 2003, the metropolitan area covers 10 counties instead of the map showing only eight counties. Any help is appreciated! UH Collegian 08:12, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Map Request

message: Maybe 20% of it by area.  The metro area is quite large and sits on more than one geographical borderline.
Living here all my life except for university days, "East Texas" is referred to as that place 60-70 miles north with the lush pine trees, violent thunderstorms, and definite rural "southernness."  It starts in Conroe, Montgomery County.  The vast majority of this area are filled with oak trees and swamp weeds.  Most pine trees here are not native and not as healthy looking as the East Texas piney woods.
The northern suburbs are much like true East Texas while the city of Houston and the south/west and southeast suburbs are much like true "South Texas" in geography and Hispanic population.  And even more, the far northwest suburbs are much like the rolling plains of central Texas plains.  More references:
* US district courts have most metro area counties in the South Texas district, also headquartered in Houston.
* South Texas College of Law, Houston, TX
Also the term "South Texas" is constantly used in news/weather casts and commercials describing the area... East Texas is still to the north.  The "East Texas" courts and college with that name in it, are also to the north.  90% of the time, we refer to this region as "Southeast Texas," as do NOAA emergency weathercasts.  No matter what the Cajuns in Beaumont/Port Arthur say.
Just had to throw that out there.  I'm not editing anything, but accuracy could be better.  South Texas and East Texas are not the most accurate descriptions.  Southeast Texas is even more accurate... but we can debate about these all day.
No argument that most of this area is in the "Gulf Coast" region, some in the Piney Woods, and some in Prairies and Lakes.  The other regions of the state are South Texas Plains, Big Bend Country, and the Panhandle Plains
Are these regions factual or do they not exist anymore???  Do we strive for factual, encyclopedic accuracy or is everything on Wikipedia written to be debated about? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.2.29.5 (talk) 18:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the East Texas article for some insight. Postoak 20:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metro area situated in East Texas? 

message: I look at the info box and notice that there is something wrong those numbers. It says that the Greater Houston area has a square mileage 10,000+. Then I went over to the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area article and noticed that it said they have metro square mileage of only 4,000+ when, by looking at the maps, their metro area is clearly larger than Houstons. Does someone know how this might have happened?--68.201.118.165 04:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Square mileage
Talk:Vanessa Paradis

message: I'm new to editing on wikipedia. 
Can somebody help me with this part:
She is also widely known as the ex partner of Johnny Depp since 1998 before they eventually spilt up in 2012, due to unknown reasons, Some say over domestic disputes overheard by their neighbours.
This is rumor based, lacks a source and is placed oddly. There is also a capital letter after the comma..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.20.128.34 (talk) 00:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Vanessa Paradis]]
Talk:CVX

message: When was it announced that CVNX-1 would be named Enterprise?
ST47: it wasnt....i fixed it
CVX also stands for Comunidad de Vida Cristiana (Christian Lifestyle Community) that is a Jesuits- based community for layman (non-members of congregation), married people, etc.
I think it needs a clarification page for second meaning.
(contact cps402085  at  yahoo  es)
Shouldn't we merge this with the Article about CVN-21?
----
Yeah, we should merege this article with CVN-21.
----
I agree with merging articles.
In the meantime, the article as written said:
:The aircraft would be launched from four catapults. Two on the main deck and two on either sides of the ship. The design was very futuristc and imposing leaving no doubt that if made, the ship would have been the terror of the seas and oceans of the world.
:But sadly, the U.S. Navy, citing huge development and design costs cancelled the project and opted to go with the current (and much cost effective) upgrades of the Nimitz carriers.
I don't necessarily disagree with this personally, but I deleted some of this and reworked the rest to make it more neutral to meet Wikipedia policy about expressing editors' opinions (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view).
--A. B.  01:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michiel Horn

message: Just in case you-all wonder where I got Michiel's birth date and his wedding date, well I just happen to be Michiel Horn's older brother and I just hapened to be a guest at their wedding, in other words Cornelia Maria Schuh is my sister-in-law. 
Cheers folks, Peter Horn 03:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates inserted
Talk:Team time trial

message: It would be interesting to note the difference in speeds in a TTT versus an ITT. Besselfunctions 15:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey I still wonder about this. Besselfunctions (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I today added a paragraph to the header that specified how the winning team in a TTT is determined (regardless of whether the TTT is a stand-alone event or part of a stage race): this fundamental fact had previously been completely missing! I also added a summary of how times are allocated to individual riders in a TTT that is part of a stage race. Only after doing this did I realise that this latter info was already covered in the section "Team time trials in stage racing". I was going to remove the duplication, but then saw that the arrangement of the article overall needs a big shake-up: for example, detailed TTT tactics are currently given a lengthy discussion before some of the basic facts. Also, there need to be many more specific citations included. I'll try to get back to all this when I have time, but any other editors who are upset by the duplicated information are warmly invited to have a go! Ian Page (talk) 23:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mea culpa - and call for help
Talk:G3 Free Trade Agreement

message: Mexico's GDP alone is  1 trillion dollars ... the combined GDP of G-3 cannot be 485 billion dollars. --J.Alonso 02:40, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor

message: Shouldn't this be at Earl Lloyd George?  Burke's gives no hyphen, for one thing. john k 02:53, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, Mr. Kenney for, in other sources, it is hyphenated. In addition, "of Dwyfor" is a part of the peerage, and it is apparently recognised by a sufficient quantity of readers. --Anglius 02:59, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Vol 2. of John Grigg, Lloyd George's leading biography (1978, that volume, p.377 of the 1997 reprint) says that his peerage title was not hyphenated, despite what the College of Heralds wanted. This was news to me, but we live and learn.Paulturtle (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

message: Several history reference books claim that his name was originally simply David George and he  added the Lloyd portion at some stage.
My parents and grand parents were adamant that David Lloyd George was a leading member of the party that sought appeasement with Hitler up until the declaration of war in 1939.AT Kunene (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As is well-known, he adopted the "Lloyd" in honour of his bachelor uncle who brought him up after his dad died (not uncommon for the era - Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman adopted the second half of his name as a condition of receiving an inheritance). Vol 2. of John Grigg, Lloyd George's leading biography (1978, that volume, p.377 of the 1997 reprint) says that his legal name remained "George" and he was incorrectly hyphenated in Hansard until 1910 and "Who's Who" until 1917. As is also public knowledge, his younger son Gwilym formally changed his name to include the hyphen.Paulturtle (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lloyd? 
Talk:List of Armenian patriarchs of Jerusalem

message: If this is an office in the Armenian Apostolic Church, the article should say so explicitly at the beginning. Michael Hardy 03:04, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: There is now a new proposed project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Oriental Orthodoxy for a group which would focus on articles relating to the Oriental Orthodox Church. Any individuals interested in working with such a group should indicate as much there, to allow us to know if there is enough support to actually begin such a project. Thank you. Badbilltucker 14:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Oriental Orthodoxy project 

message: Your last revert causes the assessment of Oriental Orthodoxy to be "???", so the rating ("importance") needs to be added. Also, the assessment in Christianity is "???", unless WP Christianity is added. Therefore, the best way is to use the following formula:
 which supplies both the Oriental-Orthodoxy and Christianity with the right assessment. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 06:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment of Christianity and Oriental Orthodoxy
Talk:NBA on NBC

message: Can we get the original logo up there.  That was classic.  The new one just wasn't quite the same.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.221.33 (talk) 04:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo Used

message: It should be pointed out that this was the worst period in NBA history. Jordan won all of his 6, Phil won all of his 9 coaching, championships in the NBC era. Any coincidence? -Amit
**Pointing that out would be point of view, specially considering the Celtics dominated the late 1950s-early to middle 1960s.- Antonio repeat Glory Marti
***The ratings for that period would say otherwise; the NBA's top 4 rated NBA Finals occured in '93, '96, '97', and '98. Paulsen 20:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: older comments

message: When was the NBA on NBC open first used (you know, with the beams of light forming the peacock)? If it did indeed begin in 1990, then that would be saying a lot about the animation of that era! 71.111.232.40 22:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Opening 

message: Just curious as to where "The" is used as an official title. Every instance I see is strictly NBA on NBC. --Zimbabweed 01:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" NBA on NBC? 

message: This section is unreferenced, poorly written and punctuated, and adds very little value to the article.  I propose it be deleted entirely.  If someone wants to put together a coherent, researched new section on the same topic, be my guest.  The current one should probably go. Franklin Bynum 04:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I miss the NBA on NBC.  Life just isn't the same without it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.237.29.125 (talk) 20:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan Support section 
Talk:Win Butler

message: I changed the Canadian bio stub to a musician stub because the other members of The Arcade Fire who are mentioned are also musician stubs. While they're from Canada, it seems better to have the same stub for each member. --Klaser 03:16, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Honestly, this entire article feels like nonsense to me. I'm not sure what's vandalism and what's actual biographical information. Could someone sort this article out? Burndownthedisco talk 22:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WTF?

message: Is Win still a Mormon.71.34.106.57 (talk) 00:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mormon
Talk:Carroll Baker (singer)

message: This is a long and detailed list that I moved to talk.  We can move the significant parts back to the article but some of these entries are bordering on the trivial (and I think some are trivia). RJFJR (talk) 17:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards and achievements
Talk:Collaroy, New South Wales

message: HTML comments removed from article, here for reference: clarkk 03:24, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Legs up missionary position

message: All top google hits for "squashing of the deckchair" are Wikipedia mirrors or related.  I googled '"squashing of the deckchair" "american pie 2" -Wikipedia' and got only 2 hits, both of which were Wikipedia mirrors.  I googled 'deckchair "american pie 2"' and got nothing about this.  I googled 'deck chair "american pie 2" sex' and got nothing.  American Pie 2 does not even contain the word "deck" or "chair".  I found a fan-typed script of American Pie 2 and neither "deck chair" nor "deckchair" appears in it!  I believe the claim at the top of this article to be total crap.  This page should be moved to something like legs up missionary position. --Strait 03:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, then.  I'm moving it. --Strait 05:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Confirming evidence: This page was created by an anonymous user who was told at one point "Please stop deliberately introducing incorrect information into articles"... --Strait 00:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the name of this page total crap?
Talk:Patsy Calton

message: Some paragraphs of this biography appear lifted straight from her official website. --Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 04:04, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International High School of San Francisco

message: IHS students, faculty, and alumni... Please help out here! Let's see if we can get this page up to a good size... Take Lowell's page for inspiration... We need a page that looks like that! lelandpaul 04:57, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did so. --Reilly 07:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I rushed some additions and welcome my content being actively edited. As to some comments above, it's true that some books comparing private schools in SF have no standardized test results for this school, and it may be because the focus on language immersion and foreign culture may skew the data. Yet its graduates end up at schools like Amherst, Barnard, Bucknell, Cambridge, Cornell, Eugene Lang, Fordham, London schoool of Economics, Harvard, Loyola, McGill, Middlebury, Mills College, Northeastern, Oberlein, Oxford, Wellesley, Sarah Lawrence, several French Universities, all the UC campuses, etc.(from the "Class of 2007 - Colleges Attending" list).  
DonL (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions to article
Talk:Jenny Craig (entrepreneur)

message: 70-year-old corporate whore will need to be updated once a year -- particularly hard to do when we lack a birthdate. That aside, is whore the most suitable term? (And if it is, why?)
reconstructing eating as a guilty pleasure -- what does this actually mean? -- Hoary 05:21, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
hahah that is so not NPOV but soooo funny — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.44.39.144 (talk) 09:44, 6 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The 70-year-old corporate whore was one of the major players in transforming weight loss into a booming industry—a transformation which is widely credited for increasing the American obsession with weight and, paradoxically, increasing American waist lines by reconstructing eating as a guilty pleasure.
Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownApple (talk • contribs) 06:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: The second para in the horse-racing section refers to the couple as the "Craig Dickerts".  Where does this come from?  I can't find any reference to the name Dickert in Google.  Rojomoke 09:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dickert? 

message: This article contained a lengthy excerpt from Jenny Craig's autobiography, not even properly cited. A large copy of this is a copyright violation and cannot remain. If someone would like to return the information from the excerpt, reworded and properly cited, that would be fine, but it cannot remain as it is. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Harcourt Park

message: Is this an offering?
The subject refers to a unique and rare collectively-owned and organized realestate cottaging corporation, located in an interesting region of Ontario, and is not meant to be viewed as an "offer," whatever that may imply. This page does not serve as a business advertisement of any kind - no more so than a page dedicated to a brand-name product such as Pepsi, Nokia, or Sony does. People who are interested in cottage living, or are researching different aspects of cottaging, would find the page on the Park interesting, due the unusual premises behind its structure and organization.
: I'd agree with that, no there is no offering.  The "Park" bit in the name is misleading.  Its legal structure is more akin to a condo corporation with private ownership of the cottages but 50 year leases on the land.  Harcourt Park is more akin to a small community, rural municipality, or village - and as such a page in Wikipedia is appropriate imho. 74.216.224.3 (talk) 18:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Commutator subgroup

message: As pointed out above, the notation G^1 is unusual. If there are no objections, I intend to change it to [G,G] (because the alternative G' is too easily misread as G in some fonts). --Zundark 12:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The notation G^{(n)} is nice in some respects because the condition for a group to be solvable is that there exists some n such that G^{(n)}=\{e\}, echoing ideas of differentiation somehow. But you are right, it isn't all that common. I much prefer G', but [G, G] should be okay too, though it might look a bit cumbersome in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dysprosia (talk • contribs) 10:20, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation 

message: This article seems to claim a total order on normal subgps.  This is probably a mistake but I wanted to check first.
Isaac (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does not (intend to) claim that the normal subgroups are totally ordered, merely that a certain partially ordered subset of normal subgroups has a unique minimal element.  The commutator subgroup is the intersection of all normal subgroups with abelian quotient and is itself such a normal subgroup, so it is the unique minimal element of the set of normal subgroups with abelian quotients, where the order is the partial order of set-wise inclusion.  It is reasonably common in mathematics to use "smallest" for partial orders to be sort of a two-part assertion: (1) it is *a* minimal element, that is, there are no elements less than it in the partial order, and (2) it is the only minimal element, and even more, every element is greater than it in the partial order.  A poset need not have a smallest element, but it can.  Infimum or meet are other common words used in partial orders and lattices.  The poset article uses the term smallest (with the sort of required qualifier, "if it exists"), and the lattice article uses "least" and "infimum" (where part of being a lattice is being a poset where smallest elements *do* exist; the lattice of normal subgroups is a lattice for instance).  JackSchmidt (talk) 03:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Smallest' normal subgp? 

message: "The commutator subgroup is a fully characteristic subgroup: it is closed under all endomorphisms of the group, which is stronger than normal."
Can someone clarify what is meant by the last clause 'which is stronger than normal'.  Does it mean "The condition of being closed under all endomorphisms is a stronger condition than obtains for normal groups" ?  As it is it kind of hangs in the air and isn't clear (to me anyway) Thx. Zero sharp (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded it. --Zundark (talk) 07:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last line of Definition
Talk:Chełmno extermination camp

message: What is (Bohn) ?Xx236 (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Still unanswered.Xx236 (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  no (Bohn) found... in what sen(ten)ce? 80.151.9.187 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 13:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Bohn)  

message: My statement is obviously true. Patric Montague is quoted several times. If you believe that the place is wrong, you are able to move the text instaed to remove it. But I believe that this information is basic, so it should go after the ahistorical name, to inform about the problem, rather to hide the information in a long text. There was no Chełmno at that time.Xx236 (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to add a source when adding information. It's not enough to say someone is quoted several times - add a correct citation as most of this article is sourced. This is basic Wikipedia 101 - adding a reliable source when adding the information. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Montague discusses this in the introduction. He says the name "Chelmno" for the camp is historically inaccurate and probably comes from the first ever English language translation of the commission report on the camp. He also says that it despite its inaccuracy it has become common in English literature and that's why he uses it. Volunteer Marek  02:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to Patrick Montague the name "Chełmno extermination camp" is ahistorical. The name of the camp was ''Kulmhof''.
Talk:Turner Classic Movies

message: I propose to merge 31 Days of Oscar into Turner Classic Movies. I think that the content in the article about 31 Days of Oscar can easily be explained in the context of Turner Classic Movies, and this article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the network's 31 Days of Oscar event will not cause any problems as far as the size of this article is concerned. Pahiy (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal of 31 Days of Oscar to here 

message: I changed the Owner to Turner Broadcasting System with Warner Media in small letters. Look at the TCM.com website it clearly states "TM & © 2019 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. A WarnerMedia Company. All Rights Reserved.". Nowhere on the site does it state that it's part of Warner Bros. or Warner Bros. Entertainment. Please DO NOT change this unless you can provide proof positive proof that Turner changed hands to a new division. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattNor91 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently says "TM & © 2019 Turner Classic Movies, Inc. A WarnerMedia Company. All Rights Reserved." It's probably safe to refer to it as a WarnerMedia channel. Trivialist (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCM is still owned by Turner Broadcasting System   

message: 2600:100E:BE10:EC5:9863:B6DE:6CD2:9D6E (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: As OrbyTV doesn't have a Wikipedia article, I don't think it's eligible to be in the infobox. Sceptre (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2019
Talk:Angel Cabrera

message: I couldn't find any source saying that he won the Columbian Open [sic] in 1995, so I deleted it from his record. Scott182 00:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournament Wins 

message: The US Open is a sanctioned European PGA Tour event. Prize money from the 4 majors and World Golf Championships count towards the European Order of Merit. Catchpole 13:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the record