Talk:Celebes crested macaque

message: I see WikiPedia are working overtime, deleting all the negative comments that have been posted here, regarding their theft of copyrighted works.  Well of course you can behave like this and try to disguise the public feeling for your despicable actions on your own site, but there are many other websites, TV news programs, media etc, upon which we can display our disgust, without you being able to whitewash over it.  People power is a significant force and I am quite certain that a great many of us will not be making any donations until your deplorable decision is reversed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.215.173.191 (talk) 20:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect. I simply moved the comments further down the page — see my edit here. No one has deleted them.--A bit iffy (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment about "deletion" of negative comments

message: "Crested black macaque" seems to be the more widely used name. Should we change the name of the article? Tim Long 00:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Celebes Crested Macaque is its official common name, according to Mammal Species of the World, 3rd ed. - UtherSRG (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier conversation

message: Against conservation status as well as content SatuSuro 08:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessed

message: I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called "[Name] Macaque" traditionally.
(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Wikipedia article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Wikipedia is a problem.)
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killer Dolphins 

message: The Celebes crested macaque is frugivorous, with 70% of its diet consisting of fruits. It also consumes leaves, buds, seeds, fungus, birds and bird eggs, insects (such as caterpillars), and the occasional small lizard or frog.
where is the reference??
from http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/12556/0
This species is found in rainforests at moderate elevations. It is frugivorous, but will also eat immature leaves, arthropods, stalks of newly flowering plants, and cultivated crops (fruits, vegetables, and maize).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laconvenzione (talk • contribs) 08:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  diet??? 

message: Looks like the references for this article got messed up with all the recent edits. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:31, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 

message: : The macaca nigra is listed under "threatened" and sub-categorised as "critically endangered". It is humans that they face an anthropogenic existential threat. Writing so therefore isn't "non-neutral", please discuss before editing. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 04:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The paragraph is about the broader concept of "interactions". You will see that that is intended to cover conservation actions, captive breeding, studies, filiming, and the selfie issue. Replacing the heading with meritorious simplifications is not helpful. The link to bushmeat is vastly more informative than the awkward phrase "preying on them for their flesh". (Finally, if you want to instigate a change, YOU discuss before editing - see WP:BRD). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The information sought to be conveyed that humans prey on them for their flesh, no need for euphemisms. Also discussion cuts both ways. You should too discuss. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Bushmeat. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to use euphemisms or links, to convey clear truth in simple clear straightforward language. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I predict that your apparent mission of ridding Wikipedia of wikilinks is going to encounter a modicum of obstacles. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are putting words in my mouth, I object to the use of unnecessary euphemisms, that may not be easy to understand, whose meaning is sought to be informed by linking it to another article. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would be happy about a link like this preying on them for their flesh Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I can assure you that no one else would.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be more accurate if speak for yourself. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threat from humans 

message: I've been changing the lead images of many articles about animals. I'm sure I want to change the lead image of this article if you don't mind.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esagurton (talk • contribs) 13:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image with full body