lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Road rally

message: The reference to Breidden rally has been corrected due to a very common mispelling of the rally name. 
Was there ever an Abergwesyn Rally? Numerous events used (use) the Abergwesyn road but an Abergwesyn Rally?
:I think you're probably right - I wrote that, but my memory is very hazy now. Perhaps I was thinking of the Sarn Helen, etc? Graham 23:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: From what little I know of US road rallies the only similarity is in the name. I think they are a relatively low speed event more like a treasure hunt in the UK. Agree though a reference to and description of should be added 80.192.241.153 01:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've put in a request for this article to be moved back to Road rally. This is the Primary Topic (see WP:PRIMARYTOPIC) and the move should not have been done without discussion. Any need to disambiguate with PEANUTS Road Rally can easily be resolved through the use of a hatnote. France3470 (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: The Gumball 3000 isn't a Road Rally but an illegal road race.  I don't know enough about the Bullrun to comment, but it certainly sounds similar Ewan (talk) 23:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gumball 3000 

message: This article is entirely focused on road rallies in the UK. It could include all the rally types such as Targa, pan-am, Monte carlo, Gimmick rallies etc that are popular world wide. Secondly, there is so much conjecture in this article that needs removing there would be very little left afterwards. I will attempt to improve it so will remove anything that cannot be cited. --Rally Wonk (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Bias and Quality 

message: *This article is written in a personal tone and includes many of one author's opinions (IMO it stands as testament to one authors rallying activities)
*This article takes an inferred definition of road rally to mean speed tests on public roads, which although never having been legal in the UK not being the point, is still incorrect.
*Special stage rallies are still road rallies
*"Historically all rallies were road rallies"... but now they're not because this definition is applied? This makes no sense.
*This article has no reliable sources, because so much of the information is incorrect
I tried to improve this article, but after removing the opinion and wrong statements, there is no content to include that isn't covered on Rallying. I would redirect to Rallying, unless a suitable use for this article can be found, however will turn this into a disam page because of the peanuts thing. I will welcome the discussion if anybody disagrees. Rally Wonk (talk) 18:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection to Rallying
Talk:Thou Art God

message: This article needs to be developed respecting the connection with this phrase/concept and with Pantheism/Pandeism (maybe Theopanism).... God is in all things, thus each of us is an equal part of God, and to strike or otherwise disrespect another person is to do this to God!! //// Pacific PanDeist * 03:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody outside of your religion is likely to add your beliefs to this article. If you think you can do so and make it verifiable, go ahead and try. We'll improve it if it needs improving, or delete it if we can't verify its source. There's no need for for a notice on the article page for something you can do yourself. I'm going to delete it. --Danbur (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection with [[Pantheism]]/[[Pandeism]] (maybe [[Theopanism]]) 

message: That References section is very silly. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.199.188 (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Living in the Material World

message: At the time and date on which I'm typing this, the article contains the text 'On "Give Me Love", Harrison blended the Hindu bhajan style (or devotional song) with Western gospel music, repeating the formula of his 1970–71 international hit "My Sweet Lord".' First off, that sentence could be better written, since in that sentence "Western" is ambiguous between "from some set of European countries" (inserted to contrast this element of the blend with "Eastern" music which would include Hindu bhajan style), and a subset of Gospel music that leans towards Country-Western music". "Western gospel" could mean either of those two things. But, worse, that entire sentence is plagiarized from the Wikipedia article on the recording by The Chiffons of "He's So Fine", which introduced this "formula of blending Hindu bhajan style and ... gospel music" to American audiences in Spring 1963. Yeah, it's a well-known "formula" alright. It's one Led Zeppelin has used a lot.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 18:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: My Sweet Lord "formula"?
Talk:Pepper jack cheese

message: This article should be renamed to just "Pepperjack". The use of the word "cheese" is redundant. If the "cheese" appendix is felt necessary, then may I suggest the name "Pepperjack (Cheese)"?
Isn't it usually referred to as "pepperjack cheese"?  Only occasionally do I hear someone say just "pepperjack".  I guess the same applies to "Cheddar" VS. "Cheddar cheese"Adambiswanger1 00:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed this incomplete and unsourced sentence. If you want to re-add it, please at least make it a full sentence, saying when and where in Arizona it was invented (assuming that it actually was invented there). -- 77.7.189.140 (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Invented in Arizona" 

message: I noticed that the picture on this page is completely identical to the picture on the Monterey Jack cheese page. I'm not sure which picture is the correct one so I didn't touch either of the articles, but someone should take a look at them and replace whichever one is false with an accurate picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.152.18 (talk) 03:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture
Talk:Galician Literature Day

message: I don't think that "Day of the Galician Letters" is a good translation of Día das Letras Galegas.  The original title means "Galician Literature Day".  I propose that the article should be moved to one of the following:
*Galician Literature Day
*Day of Galician Literature
*Día das Letras Galegas
Hmm, I see that these are all red links.  That's bad.  They should all be redirects to the current article location. — Gulliver ✉ 19:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've googled for Day of the Galician Letters, and the term does not appear to be used in English except by Wikipedia clones.  It is therefore not valid either by use or as a good translation.  I proposed the a move two days ago, and no objections have been raised.  I shall therefore now move the article.  — Gulliver ✉ 18:04, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Sphincter

message: The Orbicularis oris muscle is shown as an example on this page; it's articles states, "Orbicularis Oris is a complex of muscles in the lips that encircle the mouth; until recently it was misinterpreted as a sphincter or circular muscle, but it is actually composed of four independent quadrants that interlace and give only an appearance of circularity." (Saladin, "Anatomy & Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function". 5th edition. McGraw Hill. Page 330) Lance808 (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

message: With over 60 types, there's a clear need for a List of all of the human Sphincters. Benx45h (talk) 20:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Sphincters

message: Watch out for any changes made by 24.93.194.111.  Apparantly he has something against Tom Brady and has vandalized several pages. BucsWeb 03:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who's Tom Brady? And, what does this guy have against him?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RocketMaster (talk • contribs) 18:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism Alert

message: Can we get a animation or video of a sphincter tightening up and relaxing? Thanks! WaddlingTimy (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poopchutes! 

message: How about a short section on the use of the word "sphincter" as an insult.  Such as in the Wayne's World movies?  Champaign (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as insult 

message: It says that there are 'more than 50' sphincters in the human body, then gives microcapillaries as an example. Shouldn't that be more than 50 *types* of sphincter? There are many millions of capillaries in the body, so 50 *instances*  of sphincter cannot be correct. Syd Barrett (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of sphincters
Talk:Haas Pavilion

message: For the May 2005 deletion debate on this article, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Haas Pavilion.
Seeing as I've got some free time and I absolutely love this stadium, I'll try working on improving and expanding the article some. Joshlmay 18:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Violet (comics)

message: I think this page should be merged with Shrinking Violet. I realize that the Legion has gone through multiple reboots and that many of the characters had different codenames/altered histories. But they were still essentially the same characters. I see that similar merges have been suggested on other Legion pages. Just wanted to add my two cents. -- Rajah1 00:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed absolutely. It makes even less sense than usual in this case, as the reboot character was called Shrinking Violet, while the current version (who is on the main SV page) is actually called Atom Girl! Daibhid C 13:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Laurel Gand

message: This article could use a short blurb on the 'preboot' adult Laurel Gand, unless someone would rather start a short article on such. I don't recall if that version of the character went by the codename Andromeda or not. Korvac 19:45, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Only the "SW6" temporal clone used the "Andromeda" codename AFAIK. - SoM 19:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With that in mind (and I agree) I wish we could rearrange things so that Andromeda (DC Comics) leads to the SW6 clone / postboot Laurel whereas Laurel_Gand leads to the adult FYG character. (and Andromeda (Marvel Comics) could be for the Defender!) I don't have the expertise or the brass balls to undertake a change like that however. Korvac 22:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-ZH character redirect 
Talk:Kid Quantum

message: What does this term mean?
70.88.213.74 (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: TMK stands for Tom Bierbaum, Mary Bierbaum & Keith Giffen, the creators of the Legion series during that time period.  We should probably remove the acronym from the article.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 11:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TMK Era
Talk:Live Wire (DC Comics)

message: Moved from Live Wire by User:Apostrophe without discussion and against Wikipedia:Naming_conventions (comics). Request to move it back. - SoM 23:42, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Oppose.  This character is not the only thing named Live Wire, and I'd doubt he's the most notable (for example, there's an influential Motley Crue song by that name, as well as another DC Comics character from the Superman animated series).  --HBK 00:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

text: *The DC animated character is "Livewire", no space or caps (remember, wikilinks are case-sensitive, so Live wire and Live Wire are not the same page). What's the capitalisation of the song? - SoM 10:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

text: *Again, case-sensitivity. I don't see anyone arguing that Red dwarf and Red Dwarf should be moved to Red dwarf (star) and Red Dwarf (TV) respectively. - SoM 10:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
===Outcome===
No consensus. Move not completed. Rob Church Talk 22:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Oppose.  This character is not the only thing named Live Wire, and I'd doubt he's the most notable (for example, there's an influential Motley Crue song by that name, as well as another DC Comics character from the Superman animated series).  --HBK 00:43, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *The DC animated character is "Livewire", no space or caps (remember, wikilinks are case-sensitive, so Live wire and Live Wire are not the same page). What's the capitalisation of the song? - SoM 10:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

text: *Again, case-sensitivity. I don't see anyone arguing that Red dwarf and Red Dwarf should be moved to Red dwarf (star) and Red Dwarf (TV) respectively. - SoM 10:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: No consensus. Move not completed. Rob Church Talk 22:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome
Talk:Politics of Panama

message: I delete the following note from the top of the article:
:NOTE THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS INNACURATE INFORMATION ABOUT PRESIDENTS AND SUBSEQUENT ELECTIONS. IT IS ADVISED TO CROSS-CHECK ANY INFORMATION TO BE USED FROM THIS PAGE
Rl 20:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts check 

message: I removed this sentence:  
:It is strange that the country's socialist/worker parties are not popular, because Chavez in Venezuela and Morales in Bolivia are actually as much popular as to be democratically elected, although the elites are plotting to exterminate them.
It appears to opinion and not referenced (not to mention paranoid).  CsikosLo (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion in article 

message: the article states that Panama's Political Constitution of 1972, reformed by the Actos Reformatorios of 1978, and by the Acto Constitucional in 1983.  It misses the modification made on 1993, 1994 and 2004.  Check :wikisource:es:Constitución de Panamá (2004).--Kiam-shim (talk) 21:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 
Talk:XS (character)

message: she is the maternal granddaughter of Barry Allen 
In the TV series she is the daughter of Flash, not the granddaughter. --Rasmusklump (talk) 07:17, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  really granddaughter `?
Talk:Čelákovice

message: I am not sure but isn't it better to call the river Elbe (the German name) in English, even though it is a Czech-related article? - 193.84.186.81 (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elbe versus Labe 
Talk:Musical Instruments of King David

message: This information should probably be part of the main David article. FreplySpang (talk) 20:33, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This has too little potential for moving out of stub status. And I think  that David is a better place for it than is Psalms. Carl.bunderson 19:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Done; its now merged with David, and I'll make this redirect. Carl.bunderson 06:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jesus/Rewrite

message: Doesn't the fact that a billion or so Christians consider Jesus to be God deserve a mention in the opening paragraph? DJ Clayworth 20:37, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it does; in fact, I think failing to mention such a central fact right away constitutes a failing in the article. LeoO3 23:23, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Until everyone who calls themselves Christians comes to some kind of consensus about what exactly is the "Christian faith", wouldn't it be better to say This article is about Jesus Christ, the central figure of Christianity. For other uses of Jesus, please see Jesus (disambiguation) than This article is about Jesus Christ, founder of the Christian faith. For other uses of Jesus, please see Jesus (disambiguation) as it says now?  I foresee editwars over this one little line, all about John, Paul, Peter, Martin Luther, John Wesley, Marcion, Augustine, and (here's where it gets really sticky...) Joseph Smith.  Tomer TALK 22:30, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Agreed. I think many theologians don't think Jesus was the founder by defintion of the world founder. Not sure about that last though. Still, neutral langauge is better than not.--Tznkai 23:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig line 

message: the caption on the 11th century orthodox portrait of Jesus says that his physical appearance -- his features and skin tone -- are generally depicted as belonging to the culture of the artist.  i believe culture and race or ethnicity are being confused here.  since the earliest culture we have written records of, the sumerians, the culture was not considered isomorphic with race, and many prominent cultures subsequently, including many of the mediterranean cultures of Jesus' time. --Il hamster 07:53, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  culture of the artist? 

message: Why did user:neutrality remove the link in the Jesus page to the Jesus/Rewrite page? --ClemMcGann 18:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no link?
Talk:Interstate 69

message: *Having recently visited USA for the first time and seen the "future corridor" signs to the southwest of Houston, Texas I have been surfing the net and found out about the planned Canada to Mexico I-69.  I feel this should be mentioned in the introduction to this article, not just under "Notes" and "External Links". --PeterR 16:58, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Planned Canada to Mexico I-69

message: Is it possible to edit this map to also include the proposed portion of I-369 between Carthage and Tenaha? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 01:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-369
Talk:Killing of Manadel al-Jamadi

message: "Died during interrogation at Abu Ghraib prison". Now that's a nice way to put it... GregorB 20:46, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
As I commented above, the initial intro of this article read "died during interrogation at Abu Ghraib prison". Back then, I changed it to "tortured to death during interrogation at Abu Ghraib prison". Now it's "thought to have been tortured to death".
I find it still a bit too weasely. The article documents well that he was indeed tortured to death, as confirmed by multiple witness accounts, and further backed by authopsy findings. There is nothing uncertain nor unclear about this, nor there is a reasonable alternative explanation of his death - at least none that is mentioned in the article. Therefore, I'm changing it back to the prior wording. GregorB 17:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just restored the previous "tortured to death" wording. I believe the text of the article itself fully supports this, as I explained above (21 October 2006 comment). GregorB 15:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  UUbuntu, i would say "tortured to death", and "was killed as a result of repeated beatings and a Palestinian hanging" were synonymous. particlularly in the context of interrogation--Mongreilf (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: The use of the photos of Chuck Graner and Sabrina Harman seems excessive. Neither was involved in al-Jamadi's death, only in its documentation, and the use of these photos distracts attention from the article. There are many other photos of al-Jamadi in the body bag that could be used here, while these photos are found in many articles. --Vrmlguy (talk) 13:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graner and Harman phtographs 

message: The DoD investigation docs show two CIA interrogators, also they describe the conditions much better than the article does, and the chain of events, together with the length of the interrogation. Rich Farmbrough, 23:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Interrogators
Talk:Three Cliffs Bay

message: Please can you check that the name is Threecliff Bay (no "s"), this is how I have known it and the Ordnance Survey map confirms this.
I've lived in Pennard for most of my life, and everyone in the locality calls it Three Cliffs Bay with the "s".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.113.173.89 (talk) 10:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, even the ordnance survey and StreetMap.co.uk agree that it is Three Cliffs Bay.  Velella  Velella Talk   11:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Although on some old maps at large scales Ordnance Survey does use Three Cliff Bay and this can be seen on Getamap. However all 1:50000 and 1:25000 hard-copy maps all use the plural version.  Velella  Velella Talk   11:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

message: There are stepping stones to cross the streamhttp://www.goweruk.com/beach/13/three-cliffs-bay.aspx.  They appear to be usable as long as the stream current is not running too strong and the Mumbles tide level is below approx 8m.  Can anyone be more prescise? Ajoiner (talk) 21:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stepping Stones 
Talk:1946 Lake Success Protocol

message: For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wikipedia:Protocol Amending the Agreements
----
I think this page should be moved to 1946 Lake Success Protocol, as this appears to be the most common short name for it (Yahoo finds 18 matches for "1946 Lake Success Protocol", and 18 for "Lake Success Protocol", although something is a little wierd about those numbers, because I did see one page with the latter string on it, so that second number should be been at least 19). A few sources call it the "1946 Protocol", but that's obviously not unique enough. Noel (talk) 22:33, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:De Bow's Review

message: There must be a mistake here. The article says that the Review was founded in 1846 and survived until 1880 - but with a "brief suspension" from 1846 (the year it was founded) to 1866 (twenty years later - which doesn't sound brief). The article says it was renamed to or absorbed by the Agricultural Review and Industrial Monthly in 1884; what happened from 1880 to 1884? I've marked for cleanup. --Jeff Medkeff | Talk 20:57, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
:That should be 1864, not 1846.  Typo, my mistake.  I can't find any source that states exactly what happened between 1880 and 1884: I can find one that says it become Agricultural Review and Industrial Monthly in 1884  and plenty that suggest it ceased publication in 1880   .  I remember reading that it underwent more than one name change, so it's possible that it became something else in 1880 only to become something else again in 1884.  I'll write that into the article, but I'll leave the tag since I can't verify it. -- Trivial 05:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The current version of the publication history states that the review "changed up" (or was "changed up"?) from 1880 to 1884. I have no idea what that means. Maybe the publication schedule was skillfully delayed in order to throw off the readership? <g> — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 13:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I've sent an email to the history professor who owns the web page asking for updated link information. If I can establish a correspondence with him, I will try to resolve the above questions as well.
ck
69.19.14.27 (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverence 1 is a broken link