lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cold front

message: Just found this article during a search for articles that redirect into surface weather analysis.  Unless I hear otherwise, I am planning on deleting this article, since Weather fronts contains much more information on the topic.  Thegreatdr 15:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think these articles should stay, but they need to be expanded, as they currently are copies (or even less) of what is in weather fronts. However, looking at :de:Kaltfront and similar articles, it seems like there is considerably more that could be said (and, in pictures, illustrated) that could make these into fully fledged articles. Rigadoun  (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long lost article

message: Again, this article does not use a single word of "arctic blast," or even "arctic" and "blast" separately. Redirect does not help, and no article should require supplimentation by common sense. Please add something. I am guessing that a short sentence of definition is sufficient. For information on why this is important, please see discussion page on surface weather analysis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nnnu (talk • contribs) 06:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arctic Blast 

message: The text says "While this concept is used to generally describe frontal precipitation patterns, it is technically incorrect", and gives a reference. But the reference talks about overrunning, and warm fronts, so doesn't have anything to do with this. All the diagrams I've found of cold fronts show undercutting - can they all be wrong? 95.131.110.124 (talk) 10:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undercutting
Talk:Warm front

message: "A warm front is a boundary between an advancing warm air mass and the colder air mass it is displacing..."
Warm air is forced to rise by a cold front and "has a gradual slop of 130"... 130 whats? Degrees?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heritage.john (talk • contribs) 19:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need someone with more knowledge to clarify a detail

message: I found this article when looking for articles that redirected into Surface weather analysis.  A subarticle was created for weather fronts.  The question is, is this article worth keeping, or should it merely redirect into weather fronts, since weather fronts has more information on the topic?  Thegreatdr 15:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long Lost Article

message: There does not seem to be much interest in this article, but in response to the "Long Lost Article" question I vote for moving the material on "warm front" into the article on "weather fronts".
W.F.Galway (talk) 01:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of this article 

message: The article states that “The boundary between the two air masses has a gradual slope of 130”, but the unit of slope is not defined.  I doubt that a slope of 130 degrees is meant, perhaps what is meant is a slope of one unit of climb for every 130 units of forward motion?
W.F.Galway (talk) 01:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification requested on "slope of 130" 

message: Are the directions for the winds before and after the passage of the front for where the wind is from or where the wind is going towards? It would be normal to give wind direction as where the wind is coming from but I feel this could be stated explicitly.
Eddybarratt (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification requested on Winds direction
Talk:Spacetime singularity

message: For the moment, I've just created this as a redirect. In the long term, I think it would make sense to move gravitational singularity to here.  Some of the spacetime singularities discussed there (conic singularities) aren't strictly gravitational. Markus Poessel 15:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If so, please write some more detail of this? Newone (talk) 08:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New article
Talk:Occluded front

message: In looking for articles that were stated to redirect to surface weather analysis, I found this article.  Recently, a weather front article was split off from surface weather analysis and is being placed for GA.  The question is, does this article need to become a redirect, or do people want to really work on this article separately, now that is has been found?  Thegreatdr 15:23, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long lost article

message: I have never ever seen purple symbols on any weather forecast.
The Met office are professionals.  They know what they are doing.  They use red and blue colours for occluded fronts on all of the BBC weather forecasts.  NOT purple.
Right now on this page - http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/2643567  I can see loads of occluded fronts and they are red and blue and point in the same direction.  Look at maps further down the page and select pressure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.143.36.93 (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added red and blue as an alternative to purple; red and blue does seem more common on Met Office and the BBC but clearly both sets (purple and red-and-blue) are used. This - and the article as a whole - could do with more references. I'll look back if/when I get a moment, but obviously if someone else could step in in the meantime that would be excellent! 82.70.49.110 (talk) 10:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  symbols 

message: This is not my article so I wont add to it. The article has been written by a local area forecaster, ie has no real knowledge of formal dynamics. Occlusion process belongs to the subject of frontogenesis, and is a product of the unlocking of geostrophy by a baroclinic instability. The colder air flows isalobarically (as Gill calls it) into the cyclone center, at ground level, simply because it is the densest. This converts the potential energy trapped by geostrophy into kinetic energy. These systems can persist for a matter of tens of hours, but eventually the half-pendulum-day will catch up with it.203.213.63.24 (talk) 23:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe so, but neither of your explanations are anything other than complete blather to someone who is trying to learn about weather. if you want to teach something, at least try to make it comprehensible jeaze louise. 76.167.208.75 (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Dynamics Needed
Talk:KVVV-TV

message: That photo link doesn't seem to work.  Here are the pictures >>> http://good-times.webshots.com/album/579969668qgdhDf?vhost=good-times
*This link is reflected in the article. Also don't forget to sign your posts. -- Gridlock Joe (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stationary front

message: A subarticle for surface weather analysis was recently created named weather fronts, and the plan is to submit it to GA shortly.  The question is, should this article, since it has been a stub for 3+ years, continue as its own article, or merely become a redirect to weather fronts?  Thegreatdr 15:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect, if at all possible. Pownow 02:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long lost article
Talk:Jatinga

message: After searching Google and the Indian newspapers (in English) listed here Newspapers in India - English, I found the following sources.
A book on the subject, but no online text or bibliography.  Paracger Dushyant, D. Hara Prasad, The Bird Mystery of Jatinga, Konark Publichers PVT. LTD., Delhi, 1994.
And a quote about the cause of this mystery from an Indian paper.
Jatinga in North Cachar Hills district was (in)famous for birds diving into fire to embrace death. The gory spectacle drew a lot of tourists too. The myth has since been broken. New studies have proved that torches lit up by the local people used to attract these birds and they were killed the moment they touched down.
The Statesman 
--Maetrics 15:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searching for Sources 

message: I also believe this article should be renamed to the Jatinga Bird Mystery, as Jatinga is a specific location and this article is focused more on the mystery.
--Maetrics 15:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming Suggestions 

message: This is hogwash. Birds aren't moths, they have color vision which can discern the color of fire and the color of moon light (which birds sometimes use to navigate), they would not fly into fire (or else this hunting method would be used all over the planet since humanity invented fire). Laughing so hard at this right now, changing title to "speculation" because no research has been done to explain this. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery explained 

message: Most of this article seems to be identical to http://www.assam-tourism.com/jatinga.htm
I don't know who copied whom, but it should probably be resolved either way. ~九尾の氷狐~ (「Sumimasen!」 「Dochira samaka?」) 11:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not plagiarism if it's cited and paraphrased, so the resolution to this problem would be to cite the website and change the wording in the article. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant plagiarism? 
Talk:Treaty of Margus

message: Hi, the date added in my recent edit contradicts the date that had been there previously, but it is referenced (I changed it from 443 to 435). The two references that were used before I added two new references may back-up the date used before my edit, but I don't have access to them, so can not be sure. It seems that there may have been a series of treaties in quick succession, and these may be causing the confusion.
Sources asserting 435:
* Attila the Hun
* Encyclopedia of barbarian Europe: society in transformation
* emersonkent.com
This source suggests that there was indeed a 443 treaty, however, it does not call it the Treaty of Margus.
Cheers, Darigan (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of treaty 

message: The Huns article claims the Romans failed to pay tribute, so does it make sense to say Attila breached it first in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:D08D:0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breached?
Talk:Cosmic expansion

message: I've changed the redirect - it was to Dark energy, which is only one aspect of a particular property of the expansion (an explanation for accelerating expansion), and I've changed it to the more appropriate Metric expansion of space which is more general and more nearly synonymous with "Cosmic expansion". Markus Poessel 15:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing the redirect
Talk:Charles Ewing (general)

message: The death date at the top and in the side box do not agree with the date at the end of the article. The Library of Congress gives his date of death as 1883. Should the first two dates be changed?
kpeck1916 20:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date 
Talk:List of radio stations in Ontario

message: This list had two different call signs, CJIM-FM and CIWS-FM, listed for a single community radio station in Stouffville. Both were redlinks. Can anybody confirm which is correct? Bearcat (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Call sign question

message: {{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}
I'm a radio DJ for 90.7 RAV FM in Thornhill, Ontario and I noticed that our station isn't on this list. I would just like to edit the page so that I can add it. That is all.
Thank you
Psarellas (talk) 02:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Please provide the specific text you want added to the table. I found the call sign (CFU758) and the frequency is 90.7, but is the data on city of license (Vaughn) and owner (Vaughan Secondary School under the governance of the York Region District School Board) as found in the article's infobox correct? And what is the format? Rivertorch (talk) 05:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 5 June 2012 

message: CHST-FM 0102.3 FM London Rogers Communications adult hits 
24.114.255.83 (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  TOW  talk   19:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 21 February 2013 

message: CHAM has changed from a country format to comedy... follow the link to the web site.
184.148.34.209 (talk) 23:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHAM 

message: Add radio station in Ottawa at 101.1 FM. It is Y101 (www.country1011.com)
Station at 106.9 FM in Ottawa has changed formats, it is now non-stop hits.
Thanks!
198.103.152.52 (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —cyberpower ChatOnline 11:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Y101 can certainly be heard in Ottawa, but its actual proper city of license is Smiths Falls, not Ottawa — and, indeed, it's already included in this list. If you look under Smiths Falls, you'll see that CKBY-FM, frequency 101.1 FM, is already there where it belongs. So there's no actual change required here. Bearcat (talk) 16:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2014 

message: At 10 a.m. ET on September 7, 2015, CKOC (1150 AM) in Hamilton, still owned by Bell Media, became part of Bell Media's TSN sports network, switching format from oldies to sports. The source is announcements on the station; their website (www.1150ckoc.ca) now re-directs to www.tsn.ca/radio/hamilton-1150. Please change "oldies" to "sports".
Nealfig (talk) 14:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done JustBerry (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2015 

message: CKMS 100.3 FM is not owned and/or operated, funded, or affiliated in any way with The University of Waterloo. It is owned and operated by Radio Waterloo, Inc. Thank you.
198.235.180.201 (talk) 16:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2015
Talk:Superman and Batman versus Aliens and Predator

message: I don't know about judging the quality n' what not, but there's no mention of Aliens.  Seriously wanting to know what this series is about, how about mentioning what the hell the Aliens had to do with all of this?
Lokier (talk) 05:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the Aliens?
Talk:Iðunn

message: How do you pronounce Iðunn? 70.50.173.172 20:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ð should be pronounced like the voiced 'th' of contemporary English [as in 'thee' or 'thou', as opposed to unvoiced 'th' of 'think'], so it's roughly pronounced like 'Ithoon'. --80.139.217.225 (talk) 04:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Someone want to give a source that suggests Idunn is an avatar for either Frigg or Frejya? --Trakon 06:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of April 25, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Pass.
:2. Factually accurate?: Pass. This article is very well-referenced, and thoroughly linked to relevant topics.
:3. Broad in coverage?: Semi-pass, mentioning more things than the apples and the Poetic Edda and Prose Edda could be beneficial. Western views, or contemporary views, perhaps?
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass.
:5. Article stability? Pass.
:6. Images?: Strong pass, good work!
There just isn't much to say, a very thorough and enjoyable article. Good work!
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.</div>— +Hexagon1 (t) 02:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed it! :bloodofox: (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: Shouldn't Ydun redirect to this page? After all, when someone wants to find out what the name is and where it comes from, this article would be the best destination, wouldn't it? --93.163.53.245 (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and done. :) :bloodofox: (talk) 23:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ydun redirect?
Talk:Þjazi

message: As with other articles regarding Norse subjects, the original form of the name is often anglicized throughout the article, but IMO, on the best pages this is not the case. I think, in all fairness, that the original form of the name should be used. A  template can be added on the top of the page. (I did a google search, the term "Thiazi" is about 7 times more used than "Thjazi".) I will implement these changes, and if there is any disagreement, I will gladly discuss it and change back the altered words if that is deemed necessary. --Holt (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions
Talk:Autoantibody

message: I moved the list below to here because I think the following issues need to be solved:
*There is already a more descriptive list in the article: Autoantibody#List_of_some_autoantibodies_and_commonly_associated_diseases
*It is completely unreferenced
Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I decided to merge it with the existing list. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List with issues
Talk:Ilkka Mesikämmen

message: The redirect Ilkka Mesikaemmen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 20:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ilkka Mesikaemmen]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Woolverstone Hall School

message: Having started an article on the School, I refer OW readers to the discussion on the original Talk page []--and hope to see this article developed by more contributions. Aeronian 16:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm prepared to chuck in some links. However, the WHOBA site will need to be flagged as 'members only'. Better for Wikipedia purposes is the photo archive site , IMHO. Aeronian 20:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Why not bung him in? If at a later date we want to become more discriminating, that's a matter for that time, eh? Aeronian 20:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting off 

message: I reverted this IP edit and a following amendment because it seems capable of needed verification, but also because it included one demonstrably wrong statement, viz that Robert Cox was the first Head Boy. That distinction in fact fell to D. R. Brown in January 1952, as documented in Johnston's House report in the inaugural issue of the school magazine  Janus. Bjenks (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Head Boy 

message: After well over two years' notice, it is past time to prune "Notable former students" to meet WP standards.
That means removing those not notable enough to have inspired a WP article and/or those lacking reliable verification of their status and exploits. They can, of course, be reinstalled if/when the credentials are established. Bjenks (talk) 02:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and citations
Talk:Eminence (style)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. "Imperial Majesty (style)" is now a redirect to "Imperial Majesty", but the hatnotes confuse me. Would someone kindly update the hatnotes? Thanks. —usernamekiran (talk) 09:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support move. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 05:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 May 2022
Talk:Zyrinx

message: Accomplished video game developer with at least two successful titles. subterrania and Scorcher. Well known video game musician Jesper Kyd started his carer with this group of developers. Tranqulizer 16:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be good if the article said that. I'm refusing the speedy for now, although I think it would have qualified under A1, to give you time to establish the notability of Zyrinx. Sam Blacketer 16:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have expanded it a bit. Do you think it is ok now or is it still in danger of being deleted? Tranqulizer 17:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Heesch's problem

message: I think that the definitions in this article need to be rewritten.  The definition of corona refers to "the" set of tiles ... What set of tiles?  A base shape may have various valid coronas.  The definition also omits the necessary condition that a corona surround the previous corona.  The introductory paragraph mentions this condition, but the formal definition does not.
This condition must be defined precisely.  For example, if the starting shape is a square and we adjoin four squares to it, edge to edge, do they surround it?  Later the text mentions a modified definition, in which the tiles of a corona must be "simply connected." This cannot be right. "Simply connected" is meaningful only for a single region, not a set of regions.  In every example that I have seen, a corona (except for Corona 0) is multiply connected, because it has a hole, the hole that contains the previous corona.
Mann's definition requires that no point of the surrounded shape may be visible in the plane from the exterior of the corona.  I think that this definition is adequate, provided that "exterior" is taken to mean the complement of the tiling with respect to the plane, including any holes that may remain among the tiles of the corona.  Mann explicitly disallows holes in a corona.  This too is essential to the definition. Sicherman (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: When it defines a corona, it is with respect to a specific already-given tiling. So, re your question "what set of tiles?" The tiles in the given tiling. A base shape has only one corona in that given tiling. Because these definitions assume a given tiling of the entire plane (which may for instance have tiles of other shapes, including a big tile containing all but a finite area of the plane), the condition that it surround the previous corona follows automatically. Therefore there is no need to include complicated attempts to define "surround" in the actual definition of a corona. As for your complaint about holes, look again at the definition of the zeroth corona and at the statement that the zeroth through kth coronas form (as their union, to spell out the obvious but unstated detail) a simply connected region. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

message: Here are some examples of solids with finite Heesch numbers: First, I found this example by Jadie Adams et al. It also includes a 2D example with Heesch number 2. 
https://www.sci.utah.edu/~jadie/3DHeesch_Poster.pdf
These are my own creations. The images show that they have at least Heesch numbers 1, 2 or 3. The first example is a 3D analog to the example by Anne Fontaine. 
The second and third tiles are analogous to the example by Casey Mann and Bojan Bašić. Since the tiles are "unbalanced", they cannot tile 3D space, so the Heesch number must be finite. Theoretically, six of the "pointy ends" can be arranged to form a cube, so the argument with the imbalanced tiles does not hold. It is highly unlikely that such a configuration would form a better tiling.
 Jens G. Maier (talk) 22:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heesch numbers in 3D