lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:J. Keith Moyer

message: I am removing a reference [4] and replacing it with one that supports the claim made. I find nothing, yet, that supports using this reference, but I'm saving it here, in the event that it is useful
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRI-1990/html/CRI-1990-BLACKS.htm
Mollifiednow (talk) 20:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing a reference
Talk:Bu Zhong Yi Qi Tang

message: Is this/can this be prepared as a soup, i.e. with meat(s) and vegetables? Badagnani 05:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question 1

message: Can this also include wolfberry (枸杞子)? Badagnani 05:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question 2
Talk:John Partridge (artist)

message: These differ between the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (20 November 1789; second son) & the Ormond article (28 February 1790; eldest child). I have used the ODNB version as it seems likely to be the more reliable source and is more recent, but if anyone has any firm information it would be helpful. Espresso Addict 01:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth, place in family
Talk:List of Damages episodes

message: Is there any chance of someone adding articles for the specific episodes of this series? 24.24.90.148 22:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode articles 

message: I disagree with this assessment. He received a stomach wound vs. a more probably fatal head or chest wound. Admittedly, having left him in a field decreases his chance of survival but he doesn't necessarily die. In fact, given that Ellen expressed a desire to use Patty's law firm's resources to prove that Froshisher killed her finance, I would venture to guess this foreshadows next season's use of the charcter.
I would like to change this to "Frobisher is shot by his snitch". I'm even uncomfortable stating, say, "Frobisher is shot by his snitch, apparently left for dead." I would prefer to just state the facts. Unless someone has a reliable source that states that Danson isn't returning next year. Thoughts? ∴ Therefore | talk 04:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Frobisher is killed by his snitch" in ep. 13 

message: The article states that Damages is not returning until January 2009. The only source that I can find for this information is an webpage here, but this is probably not a verifiable source, and additionally the webpage stresses that the push-back is a rumour. If there is not some more credible information behind this, it should be removed until FX makes an official announcement. The reference linked to from the section is merely a confirmation from FX that there will even be a second season. Kidburla (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 2 airdate
Talk:The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson

message: In the 20th Century?.. Were the series really called this way? --Deerstop (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: I have changed the name of the section into "Difference from the original title" and changed a few sentences. Whoever quoted the website have written from not a neutral point of view. I have made the section more ballansed. Before starting to accuse me of trolling, read the Russian wiki page on this and also read the source made reference to. DjSeptimus (talk) 17:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altering the title on Censorship and changing a few sentences 

message: This is just plain wrong. Not only he mentions cocaine, but there is a scene where he injects cocaine with a syringe.--Reciprocist (talk) 14:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Holmes never mentions that he uses cocaine"
Talk:Station master

message: This is an article about an occupation, not a place.
Template "coord missing" do not apply.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by M3926-990031 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are quite correct - I agree. TerriersFan (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the train station of Master 

message: It mentions “cat stationmasters” in “rural… Japan”, how? AverroesII (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can a cat run a train station?
Talk:Micah Owings

message: Wasn't Micah drafted by the Rockets at some point? I believe it was the same year that Roger Clemens' son was drafted, and he was drafted before Micah.-- 20:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drafted by Rockets? 

message: Although Micah Owings may be one of the players that is going to the Reds for Adam Dunn it is not official and it seems he has been claimed on the waiver wire by a worse team than the Reds so he will likley remain a Diamondback untill seasons end, at which point he may or may not be a Red.
Can someone confirm or deny this?
24.251.58.138 (talk) 03:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam Dunn Trade
Talk:Singapore League Cup

message: i added to tag because someone can get more info and post it on here like what teams are involed and maybe even posting scores of the cup or at least post the drew on hereOo7565 05:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added

message: Although this was the initial name of the competition that became the Singapore Cup in 1998, I don't think we should add the 1997 season of that competition to this page, as it will only confuse. Can we remove it? Icedwater (talk) 14:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Singapore Cup
Talk:Asuka-dera

message: Oppose -- In my view, the growth and development of further content is not likely to be enhanced by a merge at this time.  Perhaps at some later date when one or both of the articles has been expanded, this issue could be re-visited. --Tenmei (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree --- I support edits proposed by Mantokun. This is arguably constructive. --Tenmei (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Control line

message: I made a bunch of edits to expand on the various topics and add detail. I can't immediately figure out how to put in references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett Buck (talk • contribs) 06:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass edits

message: If you want write an article about the organisations or the hobby, then write it, and put an appropriate link. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is not about the Organizations 
Talk:Coal analysis

message: coal is not made anymore  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.113.70.2 (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

message: In the section "Coal classification by rank", there is a See Also template that points to the article Coal section Ranks. This section no longer exists, and after a quick perusal, there is no equivalent or relevant section in the Coal article. Just flagging this as a problem. Prime Lemur (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to section in another article no longer exists
Talk:M29 mortar

message: Ok, rate of fire is given as 30 rounds in the first minute, meaning 1 per 2 seconds, and then a SHARP drop to 4-12 per minute after that...this sounds very peculiar. First, the initial rate seems very high, and then, why would the rate drop so notably? 62.220.164.103 (talk) 08:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of Fire
Talk:M75 armored personnel carrier

message: can any one substaniate the rumor that the M75 was supposed to be the M57? Brian in denver (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: M57

message: One photo on this page is half in shadow, the other is at distance. 174.164.72.41 (talk) 23:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Photo?
Talk:Mark 44 torpedo

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The article uses the word shroud without explaining it. Wiktionary and Wikipedia don't have definitions that apply. Should an article about this new meaning be created? Or is there a better term? Nicolas1981 (talk) 12:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shroud? 

message: From a Quora conversation https://www.quora.com/Why-do-naval-torpedoes-like-the-US-Navys-Mk-48-ADCAP-and-the-list-Chinese-PLAN-torpedo-recovered-by-Vietnamese-fishermen-in-2018-have-flat-noses-instead-of-curved-bulbous-noses-like-submarines-and-other-underwater
Fun fact. When developing the Mk 44, testing at the Key West facility kept indicating extraneous noises. It baffled the engineers as the noise had characteristics never before observed. It came in spikes just like the echoes expected from the target, but often in two closely spaced spikes where one would expect only one. It varied smoothly in volume as sound would from a radio when you turned the volume up and down. The indicated rate of closure on the sound source varied, but was often much faster than the torpedo could run. Sometimes the closure rate indicated speeds of hundreds of knots. It continued unchanged for a time after the torpedo stopped running and its sonar was turned off. However, due to the Cuban missile crisis, when the program was transferred to the Keyport Washington Naval Station, the noises stopped. Eventually it was discovered that porpoises were trying to communicate with the test torpedoes.
If we can source that I think it would be encyclopedic, and a good addition to the article. Andrewa (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porpoises
Talk:M-121 (bomb)

message: Added some information on the use of the M-121 in the Vietnam war. Can't find any sources on WWII usage. MarcoLittel (talk) 17:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure the 10,000 pound bombs were designated M-121 but they were filled with amatol and despite a thin casing, they only contained 5,100 lbs. of explosive.  This was due to a heavy steel nose that aided aerodynamics and increased their accuracy.  More common was the 4,000 pound bomb that was also filled with amatol but contained 3,200 pounds of explosive.  I don't know of these bombs being used except against Japan.  This information is in the records of the United States Strategic Bombing Survey.  The reports are entitled "The Effects of the Ten Thousand Pound Bomb on Japanese Targets" (a Report on Nine Incidents), 1947. 224 p. and "Effects of the Four Thousand Pound Bomb on Japanese Targets" (a Report on Five Incidents), 1946. 280 p.TL36 (talk) 09:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-29's Dropped 10,000 pound bombs in World War II
Talk:Hanna Kay

message: just updated page and have numerous 'citation' requests. may of these are 'ephemeral', eg. artist exhibitions where, perhaps, the only lasting 'proof' is a hardcopy catalog.
there were no certificates or awards given at the academy of fine arts, vienna
many of other citations simply don't exist on the internet in any meaningful way.
--Ushere (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed?
Talk:881 (film)

message: Goytam 47.15.19.213 (talk) 09:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sobubynmmm
Talk:Circuit minimization for Boolean functions

message: The article currently says
:The general problem is NP, but there are effective heuristics such as Karnaugh maps and the Quine–McCluskey algorithm that facilitate the process.
I don't think what is literally stated here can possibly be what is intended. Saying that a problem is NP is an assertion that it's not harder than a certain level of difficulty, not that it's at least that hard. The problem of deciding whether zero equals zero is NP.
Probably what is intended here is that the problem is NP-hard, or perhaps NP-complete (which means both NP-hard and NP). Another slim possibility is that it means something like "the problem is NP, and if the polynomial-time heirarchy does not collapse, then the problem is not P". I don't know enough about the problem to say which of these is the intended meaning. Someone who does, please clarify. --Trovatore 06:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies.  It's not my field, and I just wrote it off the top of my head (from some dim memory).  I changed it now to something possibly better, although I'm hoping that someone who knows the field will swoop in and make it into a real article.  —Dfass 07:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The general problem is NP" 

message: I decided to add the "purpose" section to clarify the reason why anyone would want to minimize a circuit in the first place. I also added an example for a circuit using boolean logic and showed that it can be simplified to an XOR gate (the picture was drawn by me, and I think the 'or' and 'xor' gates should be a bit more pointy at the edge but I couldn't draw it so well). Uoft ftw (talk) 00:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of purpose and example
Talk:Presentational and representational acting

message: I'm not so sure that my choice of 'rehearsal-performance relationship' is the best way to describe Stanislavski's and Uta's use of 'representation'. Maybe for Stan, but maybe not for Uta. Maybe it's just simpler to say 'methodological approaches' or something like that. Will think about this more...
I've put Bernhardt/Duse images here without having discussed them. Didn't want to lose the links to these particular images, as I think they work well together.
DionysosProteus 03:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I realised that although there are differences in the rehearsal method (as in the difference between Stanislavski and Brecht processes), the crucial difference as Stanislavski defines it is how the actor experiences the role while on-stage; it's an actor-character relationship, not a rehearsal-performance relationship. DionysosProteus 16:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best way to describe Uta's terminology 

message: I respect that this article is based around confusing themes, however, the language used is not for lay-people. I am a performing arts student, and whilst my specialism is physical performance rather than naturalistic acting, I still found the language very heavy.
The introduction should be based on the Syntax of Wikipedia - i.e. providing a general overview of the answer to the question, not, as would be acceptable and normal in academia, an overview of the complexity of the question at hand.
I suggest more clarity.
Sebbi (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a musician who has never studied theatre at all (not formally at least), and I found the article useful, enlightening, and intellectually stimulating, its language not intimidating or confusing. How accurate the article is, however, I'm not in a position to judge--most Wikipedia music theory articles are highly inaccurate.  TheScotch (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing article
Talk:Life insurance trust

message: I have reverted the article to the last revision on 31 December 2007 as the text added immediately following that appears to be a copyright violation from [www.willsandprobate.com/FAQ/life-ins-trust.htm  here].
I have also removed the speedy delete tag - where there is a previous version of the article that is not subject to copyright, the appropriate course is to revert to that version rather than deleting the page. 
If there are any disagreements or concerns with this reversion, please let me know. Euryalus (talk) 10:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of copyright material 

message: The article states that, "[T]he grantor trust rules of IRC §677(a)(3) cause the grantor to be taxed on the trust’s income."  Is this necessarily true?  Is the author assuming the settlor retains rights to recieve dividends or other benefits from the policy?  Would love to hear back,
Piratejosh85 (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pssh.  My bad.  Disregard. Piratejosh85 (talk) 02:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Talk:Hold On (John Lennon song)

message: The word in the middle of the song says 'cookie', not 'cocaine', I think, which I took to mean a joke, 'cookie' being what Cookie Monster from Sesame Street said. That show was on the air at that time, and John Lennon may have seen it in America.
* But can anyone explain what it means? Just a joke? (Seems most likely). Some obscure meaning/inside joke? Did anyone ever ask Lennon why he put that in there? -RedShiftPA (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Was Lennon farmiliar with Sesame Street?  It was an American show that was in its infancy when this song was recorded, and Lennon was semi-estranged from his son Julian at this time.  Then again, he was frequently in the US for primal therapy, so maybe he first saw it there. 98.221.133.96 (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oh Sheila

message: This song was number one on US charts.  What exactly would a song have to do to merit its own article besides that?RBalder 21:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting how there is no mention how this song was pretty much made to sound like Prince. In fact, the music to Oh Sheila is very similar to the Prince song "Lady Cab Driver" from the 1999 album. Also, the spokem intro, to me, sound more like an imitation of Prince rather than being australian. 69.122.122.147 (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to remember that at the time American Top 40 or similar countdown quoted the group members as saying that they denied that the song was about Sheila E., a Prince protégée. Mapsax (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Category talk:Wikipedians who have opted out of automatic signing

message: The category doesn't display properly: e.g. Animum under "M" and Jacoplane and Sandahl under "U."
While I'm here, I'll reiterate what I posted on User talk:Slakr, the talk page of the user who runs SineBot:
I don't want bots signing maintenance messages and pointers which I place on my talk page, and I don't want to add my user page to another category to prevent this.  — Athaenara  ✉  07:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I followed the instructions on  to protect my own pages, but the bot will still sign updates to pointers, , etc. on other pages if I don't add the category.  Why not a straightforward User:HagermanBot/OptOut-like page? — Athaenara  ✉  00:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ignore above complaints—added category.  — Athaenara  ✉  08:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Is there a french version of this? --JayTur1  (Contribs) 17:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: French
Talk:Nuclear power in the Czech Republic

message: I noticed this did get moved... and then moved back.  In my mind there's not much question about what should be done, we have Nuclear power in xxx articles for every major user of nuclear power right up to the Czech Republic.  We do, in fact, need such an article.  What, if any, are the arguments for keeping it as it is? -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 13:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: How can the Czech public complain about nuke waste in their vicinity, when it is exported? Stop segwaying your anti-nuke gibberish just because you haven't read anything about nuclear security since 1960.
Goddamn Hippies  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.118.177.180 (talk) 11:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bah

message: Not sure if this reactor qualifies, its regular power output is just 1kW (peak 5kW). 
http://www.fjfi.cvut.cz/Stara_verze/k417/c_info/inf_vr1.htm
--Adam Zivner (talk) 20:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  VR-1 "Vrabec" in [[Troja (Prague)|Troja, Prague]] (MFF [[Charles University|UK]]/FJFI [[ČVUT]]) 

message: As of now Russian law is prohibiting the permanent storage of nuclear waste from other countries on the territory of Russia. It is permitting the reprocessing though. Can someone update the source on the export  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.83.42.137 (talk) 14:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuclear waste export to Russia
Talk:Pfeilstorch

message: References Nr 1 - 3 are broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsciousness (talk • contribs) 20:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Broken 
Talk:Europeans in Oceania

message: In New Zealand, 78% of the population is White according to their census, apart from thousands of part-white maories. Apart from the 69% who define themselves as "European New Zealanders", there are another 9% who are White but define themselves just as "New Zealander".--83.53.170.206 (talk) 03:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree the current text is misleading, but your version doesn't seem much better to me. The NZ Census doesn't gather information on race (or European descent as such) and doesn't class anyone as "White". If a part-Maori person also identifies as NZ European, they will be already counted as NZ European, so we shouldn't imply they'd increase the European total. And while most people in the "New Zealander" group are probably of European descent, there would be many exceptions. I do agree adding something about that group would be useful, but it needs some care. --Avenue (talk) 12:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NEW ZEALAND
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperPage

message: I just added information that explains why the site has relevance and is notable, but my entry was removed by Hu12 because of a "conflict of interest?"  The original entry had several omissions and outdated information, and since nothing was edited for some time I'm not sure why a thorough and accurate description of the site is considered inappropriate?Skyscraper Source 07:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chernobyl Heart

message: "DeLeo herself contracted caesium poisoning during the making of the film, although she was successfully treated and made a full recovery."
I also heard that the cameraman for this documentary die some few years after filming. Can anyone shed light on this for me?
Royaljared (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Camera Man's 'Death' 
Talk:Noah (grape)

message: Why is it illegal to grow or make wine from this variety in France?
From web:
"Ah...here, you have to try this..." he said, turning to a smaller barrel, covered in cobwebs. "I've been saving this for more than 10 years. This is made with the 'noah' grape. You know, it's illegal to grow the vines in France and illegal to make the wine. But it's really good."
We tried it.
"Hmmm...Damien, this is very good," we replied.
We drank our glass...continued our conversation...and then thought to ask.
"Why is this illegal?"
"Oh...they say it drives people crazy. I don't believe it. I know plenty of people who drink it. They're not crazy. Well...come to think of it...they are crazy. Every one of them. But it could have been something else that made them that way." 
:Varieties of the vine species Vitis labrusca as in this case, or other "American" vine species, are not allowed to be used for wine within Europe (or at least the EU). Only the European vine Vitis vinifera (which should more correctly be called Euroasian, since it is indigenous to the Middle East) and a limited number of hybrids may be used. Technically, it's probably not illegal to grow the vines, it's just that you're not allowed to call the product wine within the EU. Tomas e (talk) 17:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Unreality of Time

message: The article says McTaggart starts challenging the B series. Not so. McTaggart starts with the A series in his seminal essay. The article also has heavy quoting where I think rephrasing with footnotes would be easier on the reader. To that end, much of the article appears disjointed and might be confusing for the reader.Jordan 18:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of argument and more 

message: At no point in this article does it actually explain what is meant by the unreality of time. Can someone add, "By 'unreality', McTaggart means..." To me this is a significant error, because I went to this article to understand this aspect exactly, as it is not evident in his paper. Can someone fix this, please? Centroyd (talk) 02:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete