Talk:Future Force Warrior

message: Ok, how do I apply this page for protected page status? I am getting awfully sick of this anonymous poster coming in and continuing to remove sourced information and add unsourced info to this article. I do not have all the time in the day to do this crap.--YoungFreud 21:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection?

message: Most of the article is not made up. The Future Forces Warrior effort was renamed from the Objective Force Warrior concept, aka Objective Warrior, aka Objective Force. Google those latter terms and you will get some older, but reliable information sources. Any statements claiming specific subsystem selections are probably uninformed and fictional (as in the case of the specifics of the MR-C, whereas a significantly different weapon is specified and envisioned). There are many components of the system that are under active trial. Final configuration decisions are unlikely to have been made at this time.
Undid more vandalism on this talk entry. ThreePD 00:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Correction 

message: How are these two articles/projects related? It's not really clearly stated in either articles, although this article makes a fleeting reference to LW, is one of them an offshoot of the other or were (are) they running concurrently? Both entries on these projects seem to run parallel to each other in terms of their objectives, should we consider a merger or at least some significant references betw. both articles? --Seng Yew 02:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Land Warrior]] and Future Force Warrior

message: Is it me or is there two 'Air Warrior Block 3' sections listed next to each other? It's late and I'm tired so somebody that can see straight and knows the subject may wanna check that --Streaky 01:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Warrior Block 3 

message: Why does the guy on the left have an Xbox 360 controller? Unicyclopedia 00:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The second image

message: Took out all the needless flattery that made it look like an advert.
Raikoh Minamoto 16:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited the Air Warior Section 

message: I provided externally linked references to reliable sources for verification of the first paragraph statements. More corrections, updates, and citations are still necessary in order to make this a reliable article, in my opinion. ThreePD (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial references provided, more corrections, updates, and citations needed

message: Are there any future plans to build the Warrior and Air Warrior helmets to be similar and have a built-in head-up display, or is that still just sci-fi fantasy? 72.224.248.129 (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HUD

message: Reference to War Hammer 40,000's "Space Marines", and,
BattleTech's, Clan Warrior's, "Elementals".
-Though, in the end, there could end up being thousands of references to fictional power armor; sorry!
76.90.73.32 (talk) 10:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Add to Section, "Popular Culture"

message: This article is in present tense, and indicates FFW is part of Future Combat Systems. However, the FCS article indicates the program was cancelled years ago, replaced by BCT Modernization, which opens in past tense with the stated date range of 2009-2010. Was FFW cancelled several stages ago? Is this article severely outdated? Some guy (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: EDIT: I changed the article to past tense. Some guy (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How outdated is this? 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/projects/land_warrior/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Future Force Warrior. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120725220651/http://www.natick.army.mil:80/soldier/media/fact/individual/fw.htm to http://www.natick.army.mil/soldier/media/fact/individual/fw.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified