Talk:Galactic bulge

message: "Most bulges are thought to host a supermassive black hole at their center. Such black holes have never been directly observed, but many indirect proofs exist."
Is "proofs" the best term to use here? It seems to me that a better phrasing would be "but much indirect evidence exists." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Necroforest (talk • contribs) .
mh just about every article about galaxys mentions them, also every major institute in astronomy does, i have my doubts about some of the black hole theory myself, but that there are major and very forcefull phenomena at the centre/basis of plenty if not all galaxys is pretty obvious. as long as the physics on it does not improve, in astronomy when it ever gets obsolete, that would be a good joke:).62.163.248.127 (talk) 23:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofs? 

message: I don't think this article is a stub, since I has multiple sections and content that does not fall into the  "irrelevant or incomprehensible" category. I'm looking over it and (although it does need some citations) the article appears to be at least a Start Class article. I'll be going over the article and doing some edits but still even in the current condition it appears to be a Start. Marx01 Tell me about it 23:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As of right now I'm going to change it to a Start Class. The article doesn't seem to have any errors that would make it a stub, and it is certainly longer than any stub I've seen. Marx01 Tell me about it 00:13, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Do bulges evaporate the way Globular clusters do? Just granpa (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer this question for folks just visiting; they do not evaporate in the same way. While particular values of the curvature of the universe could allow for dissociation over cosmological timescales, it is unlikely that they disperse like globular clusters as they are gravitationally bound. Disruption from other similarly massive objects can disrupt this, but the larger system will still have a similarly gravitationally bound system over the lifetime of the universe. --Marx01 Tell me about it 03:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do bulges evaporate the way Globular clusters do? 

message: Can someone mention where these bulges fall in the two types of bulges that are mentioned at the moment? Hobbema (talk) 07:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Box- and peanut-shaped bulges

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: 
{{Tmbox
|small = 
|imageright = 
|type = move
|text = It was proposed in this section that :Bulge (astronomy) be renamed and moved to . 
----
Moved after no opposition. (non-admin closure) -2pou (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Bulge (astronomy) →  – Per WP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION and WP:CONSISTENT to match similar articles titles such as Galactic disc and Galactic halo Rreagan007 (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 September 2020