Talk:Hibernate (framework)

message: I have never heard Hibernate referred to as H8, does someone have a reference for this? -- AndyHedges 19:57, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I removed it. It doesn't pass the Wikipedia:Google test. -Hyad 17:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  H8 

message: Large sections of this page read like marketting material for Hibernate. It could do with rewritting. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.32.240.68 (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited the intro a little.–130.149.154.39 (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: I could not figure out the meaning of the following sentence:
Hibernate 3 is also very close to the EJB 3.0 specification (although it was finished before the EJB 3.0 specification was released by the Hibernate wrapper for the Core module which provides conformity with the JSR 220 JPA Entity Manager standard.
:It looks as though two sentences have been mingled. - Eric 85.205.117.45 (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the closing parenthesis and I think it's clearer now. Rharner (talk) 11:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Like JPOX.
Quote from JPOX site:
" You can use a proprietary or non-standards compliant persistence framework like TopLink, or Hibernate and persist your plain old Java objects. You will, however, be tied in to their API and be unable to easily move your system to an alternative implementation.
Alternatively you can use JDO, a standardised persistence interface. With JDO you can take your plain old Java objects and just persist them as they are. It is totally transparent and very little work is required by the developer." (http://www.jpox.org/docs/jdo/jdo_why.html)
So, any argument about this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.214.130.248 (talk) 07:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare to Standards Based frameworks? 

message: :Image:Hibernate.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hibernate.gif

message: Seems like Hibernate Core is a duplicate of this article, and much less detailed. Possible merge/deletion candidate?
Brindyblitz (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hibernate(Java) vs. Hibernate Core? 

message: The article states that Hibernate uses POJOs with annotations for declaring data mappings.  I find this highly confusing because I am almost positive that Hibernate 1.0 did not offer this mechanism.  In fact, www.hibernate.org states that Hibernate supports J2SE 4.0 and annotations were not added to Java until J2SE 5.0.  EJB added POJO with annotations support in EJB 3.0 and this was considered a landmark, ground-up re-write of the technology.  I suspect that there was a similar major paradigm shift in Hibernate and that should be chronicled.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.113.131 (talk) 04:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POJOs and Hibernate version 

message: The Hibernate Validator should be described in this article. It is mentioned in Comparison of web application frameworks and Bean Validation. Obankston (talk) 17:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hibernate Validator 

message: Check hibernate.org. Their current products' names are: Hibernate ORM, Hibernate Search, Hibernate Validator, Hibernate OGM and Hibernate Tools.
I propose to rename the article to "Hibernate ORM".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.169.111.221 (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the article's name from "Hibernate (Java)" to "Hibernate ORM"? 

message: The article uses this term without defining it or linking to anything. I couldn't find a Wikipedia page on persistence as it related to software, so I couldn't add a link. I'm a little unclear what is meant by persistence so adding a brief explanation might help, given that this seems to be an important concept for Hibernate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.219.90.1 (talk) 19:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Persistence"