lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zorse

message: Wikipedia Zorse article says Zebra Stallion and Horse mare OR VICE VERSA.  Is that true?  According to this: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?objectid=10448585, it only works when the father is a Zebra, so there is no vice versa.  
60.234.132.245 00:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are they the same thing?  I think at least some hybrids have genuine differences depending on which species was which parent.  (If e.g. certain traits are caused by genes carried by the Y chromosome). 62.172.108.23 (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Generally differences in which is the stallion and which the mare, varies the size and coloring of the offspring, but are very similar. Naming changes, as you mentioned, from zorse to hebra. Labrat3004 (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  zorses are cool 

message: The article does not state whether Zorses are fertile and capable of reproduction. It's an exceedingly important detail. Virgil H. Soule (talk) 02:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a link I found to be reputable that includes, on the last line, that this hybrid is generally sterile. Labrat3004 (talk) 14:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fertility 

message: Merge Zony into Zorse. There is a large overlap because ponies are nothing more then a breed of horse. Having zonies as a subsection of the zorse page would be adequate.Sir Robert "Brightgalrs" Schultz de Plainsboro (talk) 00:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, ponies are not a breed of horse - they are phenotypically different from each other. There are many different breeds of ponies, just as there are many different breeds of horses. That being said, I can definitely see the sense of this proposal. Support for now, unless something comes up that I'm not seeing. Dana boomer (talk) 02:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm OK with it also.  We do, however, also have the catchall article zebroid, and also another spinoff zonkey.  I kind of wonder if all these should be merged into one comprehensive article.  And then, of course, the Little Red Hen question:  Who wants to do it??  Montanabw(talk) 15:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can, but which article should everything be at? Zebroid would be my choice. I tossed merge tags on Zebroid and Zonkey, in case that catches any other users who are interested in the discussion. Dana boomer (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO, Zebroid.  It's the general one that covers all the others.  Montanabw(talk) 21:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Lubricin

message: Science Daily — Using a method that allows precise measurement of the biomechanical properties of the hip joints in mice, researchers at Duke University's Pratt School of Engineering have found new evidence that an ingredient of joint fluid called lubricin plays a significant role in keeping joints limber.
The researchers say the finding offers the strongest evidence yet that treatments designed to increase levels of lubricin in humans may help stall the deterioration of arthritic joints.
Is there any way for the public to get injections of Lubricin? 
What about increasing it thru other methods/
This is not a Q&A thread on lubricin, nor is this a place to get valid medical advice.  I will delete this comment after a few days.  Please only discuss matters of direct relevance to improving the article here.  Lesotho 02:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The correct reference for superficial zone protein (SZP) is
A novel proteoglycan synthesized and secreted by chondrocytes of the superficial zone of articular cartilage.
Schumacher BL, Block JA, Schmid TM, Aydelotte MB, Kuettner KE.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994 May 15;311(1):144-52.
Thank you
BLSchumacher (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct reference for superficial zone protein (SZP)
Talk:Birds of a Feather (The Dresden Files)

message: I noticed that a difference from the book was mentioned under the Trivia section. I'm of the opinion that we probably don't need to detail that type of info here given that notable/major differences are covered on the main page. Perhaps it's best to confine any book references to larger items of note that are uniquely to do with that episode (such as noting that Storm Front is based on the book o nthe appropriate episode page, etc).  Thoughts? --Jtfolden 02:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Differences

message: Thank you for starting this page- I will adopting the Dresden Files Episode Pages. Thanks. Does this fall under the Television Shows wikiproject? -- Yossi842 22:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Legal working age

message: Here it was in its entirety:
    * United States
          o New Jersey - 13 for some jobs, 14 for others, 16 for most, 18 for all [1].
          o Maryland - 14-17 with a work permit.[2].
    * UK
          o 13 - Part time work WorkSmart from the TUC shows that the type of work is restricted to light agricultural or horticultural work or as allowed by-laws.
A list of working ages for two American states and a claim about the working age in one other country does not constitute an encyclopedic list of working ages by country. It is far too incomplete to be included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.205.92 (talk) 02:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So fix it, add more. Being incomplete is a very bad reason for removing the list. WP:Wikipedia is not finished -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted "Working Age by Country" section 

message: Recent additions are either unsourced, or cite forum discussions. Surely there are more concrete sources out there for this information. Could someone please find some? Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with this page 

message: Here is a summary of Japan's default working age:
Age	Condition
15 	Minimum employment and working age
18 	Restricted
20 	Free
Hmm...I am not sure if the claim above is true. I know that the minimum working age is 15, then I thought at 18 is restricted and 20 is unrestricted. Does Japan's box just need 15 or will this information be retained? Recently I found a reliable source to prove that Japan's minimum age is 15.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.18.28.105 (talk) 05:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese working age dispute 

message: 2600:387:1:809:0:0:0:A4 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Missing From Multiple Countries and U.S. States
Talk:Moore, Cheshire

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Burtonwood and Westbrook

message: #The stub needs to be expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 13:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Culcheth and Glazebury

message: #The article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 14:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Grappenhall and Thelwall

message: Why not simply copy the infobox to the Grappenhall and Thelwall pages since the box itself is very small? LaudanumCoda 01:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing this deletion notice for the following reasons:
#This article is about the civil parish which is named after the two principal settlements it contains, Grappenhall, and Thelwall. The two types of entities are not the same.
#A civil parish is a third tier local government area within the UK, and as such it occupies a conceptually separate position to that of the settlements it contains.
#There are already well-accepted separations between the administrative areas and the settlements they contain elsewhere on wikipedia which are reflected in having separate articles about them. The fact that at the moment, this article is a stub, is irrelevant, given that it is in exactly the same situation as other stub articles that are not prodded, and it will not always be a stub.  DDStretch  (talk) 09:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Euterpe oleracea

message: I propose that the pages Açaí Palm and Euterpe oleracea should be merged, since they contain very similar information. Probably the few new information in Euterpe oleracea should simply be moved into Açaí Palm and the former page then deleted. Note that several wiki pages of other languages link to either one or the other of these two pages; they should all link to the one merged page. Note also that the page Euterpe (genus) is fine; it deals with the general plant family; here were talking about one of its members. -- 85.3.251.194 (talk) 13:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:IRA Quartermaster General

message: I'm tempted to propose merging this page with the main Provisional IRA page.  There's hardly any useful info here which couldn't be easily added there.  Thoughts?? JXM 16:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree fully. Will you go ahead if there are no other comments here after (say) a week? Billsmith60 (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with main IRA page?
Talk:Beautiful Eyes

message: iTunes Live from SoHo is a part of Taylor Swift's discography, so there is no reason not to include this. Template:Infobox album#Chronology literally says that "albums or EPs don't need to have their own Wikipedia article link to be included in the chronology." Putting this in the chronology does not make the article not explained fully. So please stop using WP:AUDIENCE as a reason to incorrect the chronology. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 22:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: According to the article:
She first performed "Beautiful Eyes" on January 23, 2005 at the 2005 NAMM Show, an annual music product trade show held in Anaheim, California at the Anaheim Convention Center. 
However, Taylor performed the song at the Bluebird Café on November 4th, 2004 along with ‘Songs About You’ and ‘Me and Britney’.  Coco the Dawg (talk) 08:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beautiful Eyes (song) first performance.
Talk:Mu Sagittarii

message: "Polis" yet another star name hoaxes propagated around Wikipedia? I belive I have missed this one. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, the name is in Allen99. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Polis?
Talk:Arndt–Schulz rule

message: *title "The dose makes the medicine" http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359644606001164 "There are investigators who consider the Arndt–Schulz rule to be a biogenetic ground rule applicable to all biological systems. This principle of nature deserves careful consideration in pharmacology and toxicology."
84.106.26.81 (talk) 18:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Biogenetic ground rule

message: The notability of the Ardt-Schulz rule is currently under review by Wikipedia editors. Though this is no longer considered a fundamental law, this postulate has historical notability as a prevailing theory during the very early years of what is now regarded as pharmacology. This significance is examined in several pharmacological texts by noted scholars in the field (see references in my recent edits to the article).
scientia ad populem (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'm removing the tags. Can you also make use of the citation anonymously given above? – Fayenatic London 22:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: There is a misquotation of a source referring to the IR spectroscopy of OH bond from water worded as hydrogen bond dynamics required for water memory (Benveniste concept) in connection to disproving the topic of the article. The text of source does not support such wording, it refers to the timescale of observation of the OH frequency. A rephrasing is at least necessary according to text of the source. The text of the source has nothing to do with the topic of the article.--5.15.53.44 (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misquotation of a source
Talk:Thugz Mansion

message: tupac's mom spoke of thugz mansion as a place tupac wanted to build where people could rebuild their lives and get employment especially for ex felons . This would be houses all over America. please add to this  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.120.120.139 (talk) 05:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  HALF WAY HOUSE
Talk:Killepitsch

message: Does it contain any artificial colors or flavors? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artificial colors or flavors? 

message: Is it true that it's made with 98 different ingredients? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  98 ingredients?
Talk:Altair in fiction

message: Added link to Choose your own adventure book - "Third Planet from Altair" Twfowler 22:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: great as he is, belongs in Altair_(disambiguation), not here. Talyian (talk) 04:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: actually, even better: Alta%C3%AFr has his own page. Talyian (talk) 04:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seems as though someone put him back in... I removed him. Altair77 (talk) 00:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altair of Assassin's Creed 
Talk:Sociology of the body

message: There is a field called "social medicine" which INCLUDES but IS NOT LIMITED TO "medical anthropology" (it also includes medical ethics, sociology of medical education, medical education, medicine and religion, etc.  I work at the Harvard Medical School in the Department of Social Medicine (www.HMS.Harvard.edu/dsm/) and suggest that branching off into links with "social medicine" MAY be a way to expand this Wikipedia stub.  www.SocialMedicine.org  Maynard S. Clark 22:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Dnc16908 (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Self and Society
Talk:Clohamon

message: As at 20 February 2007 the article read as follows:
:Clohamon is a small, rural village located 2 miles from Bunclody in County Wexford, Ireland. The village's population is 86 (2002). Clohamon is home to the two largest meat factories in South-East Ireland, employing 12,459 between them. in 2005 Clohamon became the focus of intense media coverage when one of its inhabitants, Ultan Cowman, was found brutally murdered outside his pub in the centre of the village.Two of Clohamon's most famous sons are Myles O Connor and Charlie Hogg who play on the Irish Rugby Team as number eight and full back.Charlie Hogg and Myles O Conner are the up coming heroes of Clohamon. Myles got a new John Deer 19 Jan 07.And Charlie found a new pocket knife on his uncles farm,he also got a PSP for christmas "06". Clohamon is small but full of crime.Clohamon castle and Clohamon mills are the main features of the village.Owned by Myles O conner and charlie hogg. This is also the home of the  Yvonne O' Connor and Corinne Doherty
As most of it appears to be junk, I've reduced it to just the following the fact as it's the only one I can verify:
:Clohamon is a small, rural village located near Bunclody in County Wexford, Ireland. 
--A bit iffy 22:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mostly junk

message: I've removed the following sentence:
Some of Clohamon's most famous sons are Myles O Connor and Charlie Hogg who play on the Irish rugby team as Blind Side Wing Fourward and Full Back
These names are not found in List of Ireland national rugby union footballers or Ireland national rugby union team--Yumegusa (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed them again. Hogg (if he exists) appears to be non-notable. Sarah777 (talk) 01:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish rugby team
Talk:Bellard's formula

message: Can this be used outside Pi?
87.217.11.121 (talk) 03:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other possible uses outside Pi? 
Talk:Barbicide

message: The claims about the origin of the name seem highly unlikely, and are uncited.  24.125.207.68 23:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the company's own explanation. http://www.king-research.com/news.asp?record_no=3746  Quirkie 19:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

message: If Marvicide is related, perhaps there should be a reference to it. 66.191.19.68 (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvicide? 

message: I took this part:
"(50% C14, 40% C12, 10% C16)"
out of the talk about the main ingredient in barbicide, because it seems wrong.  Please get someone to cite or substantiate this before putting it back in.  In general, I think the small section on its chemistry needs to be cited (and of course expanded).  Umma Kynes 09:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Ingredient 

message: This article reads like an ad for the product.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.20.8 (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertorial?
Template talk:Importance scheme

message: :[The first post in this topic was copied here from Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team#Importance Temp. since it is more relevant here.]
Hmm.  I'm not too keen on this as a replacement for all WikiProject assessment tables of this sort.  The Assessment Dept. I'm building for a particular WikiProject uses a slightly different scale (different in that the relative weights aren't so generic; the Top/High/Mid/Low sections all exist, and there aren't any additional ones.)  This is even more so when it comes to the Class scale; we feel that what the Biography or Sports wikiprojects consider a Start vs. a Stub, or a B-class vs. a Start, does not reflect what our topical project would actually consider a proper Start or B-class within our articlespace; our requirements will be more stringent.  Anyway, our Priority (not Importance; we borrowed Priority from WP:BIO because it sounds less judgemental) scale also uses examples (and more than one) from our own field of topics, since examples like "0.999..." and "Australia" are not very informative at all in our context (and in fact to me look more like the difference between Stub, Start, etc., at least with the examples given.)  I think that Importance Scheme would be very valuable as a model or guide, but even to achieve that, the examples all need to be of about equal length and quality, so that "Low" is not confused with "Stub".  Shouldn't be hard.  There are LOADs of somewhat- down to just-barely-notable, but in-depth articles that have even achieved F.A. status (e.g. the Pokemon minor character that looks like a torotise-thing that was a front page F.A. last year). Great example of Low but F.A., even in a narrow sub-field like children's anime.  — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 22:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe use it in the substitution format? Then the template examples can be replaced, with ones specific to a particular topic. --KZ      Talk  •  Vandal •  Contrib  21:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some issues

message: I was bold and added the ability to add project specific text to this table.
 Top_text=
 High_text=
 Mid_text=
 Low_text=
I still can't figure out why the project specific categories don't work. - LA @ 20:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be possible to allow both the base criteria *and* the project-specific criteria to be displayed, as separate columns? Currently you have to choose one or the other. An example of both displayed is at Template:WP_Football_Importance_Scheme, which is a bespoke template that could be deleted if my suggestion were implemented here. --Jameboy (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project specific criteria text 

message: Would be nice if this template allow us to state "Priority" instead of "Importance".  As stated above, many projects are using this term.  Morphh  (talk) 1:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Priority

message: The Nico Schwanz article has been deleted. Are we able to replace this with something else? TheDragonFire (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Nico Schwanz
Talk:Interference, Inc.

message: Hm, I don't think that this article has enough material to warrant the advert tag - doesn't read like an ad, and rewriting to make neutral doesn't really make sense.  In any event, if the only real claim to notability that these folks have is the [2007 Boston Mooninite Scare], this should probably be deleted and replaced with a redirect to that article.  If there comes a time that they're notable as an entity and not just as aspect of that event, the article can then be created. Bitnine 23:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint
Talk:Kingdom of Valencia

message: Only 1.2% of Jaime I's troops were Catalans, and they didnt even stay after the conquest, so stop writing valencian language developed from catalan language, because it comes from LATIN. they're SISTER TONGUES, but one doesn't come from the other one.
:The translation is in progress. You may want to help by enlarging the translation, but deleting sections is not helping, on the contrary; for not to mention that you did so without sources. Mountolive | Talk 07:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the map "Christian conquest of the Kingdom of Valencia" to the article. It is not in its definitive place. Maurice27 02:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to interject, the statistic 1.2% sounds far to precise to be accurate and therefore is unbelievable. Whether the reality behind it is that Catalans were few among the Valencian conquerors or it is just wrong and based on bad methodology, I cannot tell. Furthermore, Catalan and Valencian are, as far as I know, not differentiable, really, as languages and therefore, whether the one developed out of the other or alongside it is like asking whether Canadian English grew out of or alongside American English. Srnec 07:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Carles, just one question. Why is it redirecting in the infobox Philip IV to Philip V? is it because Philip V of Spain was Philip IV of the Crown of Aragon? and, shouldnt be listed as last king Charles II of Spain anyway? Mountolive  deny, deflect, detonate 20:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, if I am not wrong Philip V (IV of Aragon and Valencia) was the last king, as he inherited the crown at the death of Charles II, prior to the war. --Carles Noguera (talk) 13:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last king