Talk:Urnfield culture

message: I see
* Konrad Jad?d?ewski, Urgeschichte Mitteleuropas (Wroc?aw 1984).
and can't find an entry in the page history where this was not corrupted with ??? - does anyone know the correct reference? --Nantonos 15:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Malformed references

message: Funeral practices are a form of religious practice, and religious practices are among the most conservative of all cultural or linguistic elements. The question rises, then, of why inhumation gave way to cremation.
My answer is that some sort of religious innovation occured. I gather that cremation seems to be associated particularly with warriors. No specific ethnic or linguistic group can be clearly linked to them, tho' Italics and Celts are often linked to it. It is also 
:"the major late Bronze Age ... culture of temperate Europe" (JP Mallory, EIEC, "Urnfield Culture". 
It was a prestige culture, probably the elite culture; it is hard not to think of it as a warlord culture. The Urnfield culture is reputed to have originated in the Balkans (references?).
Interestingly, the dates for Urnfield are the same as those for Mycenae. And the traditional date for Homer, ca, 800, comes at the end of the Urnfield culture. While the Mycenaeans practiced inhumation, and in fact, there is seems to be NO evidence for Urnfield practices in Greece (and particularly, in Thessaly), we nonetheless have the funeral of Patroclus in Book 23 of the Iliad, which is both an Urnfield burial and a kurgan burial -- with human sacrifices, and the addition of animal sacrifices, the ashes put into an urn and buried at the base of a tumulus. Homer has transmitted to us something very interesting, something that does not at all fit into the Mycenaean scheme, but nonetheless reflects something from further north, the steppe perhaps, but more likely, from the Balkans, something definitely Urnfield-related. 
The picture I get is of late bronze age multi-ethnic war-bands wandering all over the place, following a barbarous war-god religion, a religion that perhaps saw the smoke of the dead warrior's pyre as a sort of translation into proto-Valhalla. It may have also been a recognition that wandering warriors could not stay put to watch over a proper inhumation, so the deceased and his grave-offerings were all incinerated, just to keep the grave-robbers away.
As for Patroculus, I think Homer is just inserting some stuff unrelated to the Greeks, but quite pertinent to his stock of old stories. --FourthAve 07:34, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Cremation?

message: What does that mean? Does it stand for something? --AW 18:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Urnfield culture covers the phases Hallstatt A and B (Ha A and B) in Paul Reinecke's chronological system", see Urnfield_culture#Chronology. Tankred 03:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ha A, Ha B etc? 

message: I would like to ask the author of this page, or someone with the proper knowledge to review the page for accuracy.  I have found one blatant case of vandalism (something about "octopuss pie is good") and removed it.  
The second case is somewhat suspect.  Disclaimer: I am layperson on this subject.
The following text is quoted from the article:
"Also in many regions of the celtic society the druids and druidesses used large sacred saber teeth straight from the mouth of saber tooth tigers. Often the teeth were still covered in blood from when they were removed. This showed the greatness of the druidess or druid that removed them."
I believe this to be suspect for the following reasons:
I don't remember hearing that Saber-tooth tigers and Homo sapiens coexisting.
While the rest of the article is very vague as to the religion of the Urnfield culture (due to our current lack of historical sources detailing the religious practices), the suspect comment is very detailed as to the druidic practice and the social standing of said "druid" once the tooth was removed from the animal.
The occurrence of other vandalism on this page also heightens my skepticism of this comment, which seems to differ from the rest of the article in detail and tone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.66.144.98 (talk) 19:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Vandalisim? 

message: The link on the map points to the stone age Danubian culture, not the bronze age.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wvdveer (talk • contribs) 09:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link 

message: Please either redo or skip this cruelly "simplified", rather mistaken map! HJJHolm (talk) 06:56, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree --Xoil (talk) 12:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Simplified" map=

message: This article is very interesting but sources are scarce.
Please add more references. Jfrheault (talk) 04:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more sources 

message: There is a global consensus that the information on the page is either contested or impossible to verify due to lack of sources.  Jfrheault (talk) 04:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed