lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of political parties in Sudan

message: I think we need some verification on Hizb ut-Tahrir as well, I'm personally skeptical. Influence does not mean influence, let alone organized as a party. I might be wrong of course, I await 78.101.184.250's comment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by La gaie (talk • contribs) 21:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hizb ut-Tahrir 

message: Good news. It looks like removing the Southern parties has already been taken care of in this edit. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partetion of sudan 
Talk:Uzel

message: ----
Added additional reference to Uzel, the first Soviet digital computer used on submarines.  --
Adeptitus 21:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:General linear model

message: isn't this just the same as Generalized linear model?
Gtx from the country of the football championships ;-) Frank1101 21:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the generalized linear model is considerably more general than the general linear model.  (This is obviously not the greatest terminology, but it is standard.) -- Walt Pohl 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: On terminology

message: The above says "it is standard" but there is no citation. Kendall&Stuart use "general linear regression model" for what is is otherwise called "multiple regression" ie a univariate independent variable. I believe I have seem "multivariate regression" used generally for the problem as described in the article: for example by Zellner(1971) An introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics, Wiley . But I cannot find this in my stats dictionaries. However "General linear model" does not appear either. So, any citations for the term "General linear model" used in the sense of the present article? Melcombe (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Try one of these: , ,  —G716 <T·C> 14:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on terminology
Talk:Kaimganj

message: I formatted and wikified this article. I had to remove some of the wording because I could not understand it. Please add back anything I took out that you want to remain. If you need help you can contact me.  KarenAnn 21:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Qaimganj is wrong name the correct name is KAIMGANJ
plz correct --Dr.jagdish (talk) 05:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On 11 June 2009 Anupam moved this article from Kaimganj to Qaimganj, without giving any explanation. Subsequently the use of the name Qaimganj was criticised, and the article was moved back to Kaimganj by Gigs, but then returned to Qaimganj by Anupam, who gave no explanation here or in an edit summary, but posted a note on Gigs's talk page stating that "the correct name of the city is Qaimganj", and giving statements about the local form of the name to justify this. Wikipedia's policy on the naming of articles is that we should normally use the name most commonly used and recognised in English; also the guideline on place names says "When a widely accepted English name, in a modern context, exists for a place, we should use it. This often will be a local name, or one of them; but not always". (My emphasis.) My investigation indicates that "Kaimanj" is far more common in English than "Qaimanj": for example a Google search for pages in English containing "Qaimganj" produces 203 hits, while a similar search for "Kaimganj" produces 9650. (It does not, in fact, make much difference if we do not restrict the search to pages in English: the corresponding figures are respectively 234 and 10600.) Consequently the article's title should indeed be "Kaimganj". JamesBWatson (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  This CSD nomination did not meet the criterion WP:G6, as it was not uncontroversial. However, I am convinced by this argument and the party moving in the other direction has not provided any verifyable arguments for their moves. I therefore performed the move. If there is any disagreement, please go through Wikipedia:Requested moves. — Sebastian 19:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Real Live Dead One

message: It appears that there is a misprint in the A Real Live Dead One's song listing, that has been copied to it from A Real Dead One's... According to the booklets, songs The Trooper and Iron Maiden were recorded at Helsinki Ice Hall (In Finnish "Jäähalli", in Swedish "Ishallen")  June 5th, 1992. However, the songs Bring Your Daughter....to The Slaughter, The Clairvoyant and Fear of The Dark (that are on A Real Live One and A Real Live Dead One) would have been recorded in the same place, but on August 27th, 1992. I checked the tour date listing on A Real Live One's booklet (which doesn't, btw, appear on A Real Dead One's booklet) and according to it, Iron Maiden's Fear of The Dark tour (during which all the songs for these live albums were recorded) began from Reykjavík, Iceland 5th of June, while the only Helsinki concert during the tour is on August 27th. By listening both Iron Maiden and the The Trooper from A Real Live Dead One, I am assured that they truly have been recorded in Helsinki ("Scream for me, Helsinki" -chants by the singer) but the date seems to be wrong. --KirvesAxe 14:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to ask the same thing. We have both dates appearing throughout articles here (Hallowed Be Thy Name says Helsinki was 5 June). maidenfans.com, which is a very detailed site and which seems to be fairly reliable, also says 5 June. However, I'd go with the tour dates if I had to make a choice (with a note explaining the discrepancy). --kingboyk 16:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finland dates

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:A Real Live Dead One.jpg, found on :A Real Live Dead One, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:InvisiClues

message: Could the dates when the i/c were first & last published be added? I think this is important for the context of the article (i.e. their timeline). Thanks, Hu Gadarn 21:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates? 
Talk:Place Charles de Gaulle

message: {Title level lchanged to 2nd level by Steue (talk) 23:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for more history 

message: {Title level lchanged to 2nd level by Steue (talk) 23:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This used to be common, but has been replaced with automatic assumption of equal blame (like-for-like). I'll update the article and source my info. Andrew Oakley (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insurance 

message: This entire article is an info box FearThyMoose (talk) 02:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That was due to a left-over  tag, which I have removed. Angusta (talk) 17:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box 

message: Re.: Place Charles de Gaulle #History / left side / second photo:
Until 1970 this place was called "Place de l'Étoile".
But the title under the photo reads: "Place Charles de Gaulle in 1939".
This is a FALSIFICATION / MIS-representation of the history, of historical facts.
This title is historical nonsense!
Steue (talk) 23:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title under the photo "Place Charles de Gaulle in 1939" is NONSENSE
Talk:Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky

message: Are we to understand that the former territory of the City of Louisville is part of the "balance", or not? —Tamfang (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  could possibly be a teensy bit more explicit 
Talk:Syrian Football Association

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Syrian Football Federation →  – The officially shortened code name of the Syrian federation is the SFA, standing for Syrian Football Association, and the badge of the Syrian federation also written as SFA. However, the article's name is Syrian Football Federation, which is SFF. This doesn't make sense at all. HiddenFace101 (talk) 09:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 November 2023
Talk:Stuart cloete

message: For a novelist of his stature, there is scant information out there. Possibly it is because his novels have become unfashionable, as, although for their time quite liberal (indeed controversial), hes used kaffir and other now offensive terms, etc. (POV). I have tried to summarise what little there is as best as possible. This is the first article I have attempted to write for the Wikipedia... and it  is a work in progress. Others' contributions are welcomed wholeheartily (this is a wiki.) I am aware that much of the wording, formatting (particularly the formatting) etc. is poor. Also, I am aware much of the content requires better sourcing. Finally, I am aware that there are mistakes (ommissions and misclassificatios) in the list of works by the author. I could not find a definitive list on the internet, (will need to consult a paper library) but managed to compile this list from worldcat. I (or my mother, at least) only have copies, as far as I know, of 4 of his novels, and one of his short story collections. Unfortunately, and bizarrely, none of these have "also by" lists. Postscript: I don't know if this can be classed as a stub or not. There is quite a lot, although it is quite higgledy-piggledy and insubstantial. I personally say yes (which is why I tagged it as such,) but feel there is a need to highlight this article as a long stub. It will probably be pruned by subsequent edits, at least at first, though. (Feedback, please, especially my South African brothers.) Garble 21:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:RocketMail

message: http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20080229
Maybe someone knows more about it an can add the newer developments.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.229.80 (talk) 16:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AOL and RocketMail? 

message: I moved the following paragraph over from the article, because it seems to me lke unsourced POV nonsense. Any other opinions on this? --Baumi (talk) 00:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced....but I'd say pretty accurate rather than nonsense 92.2.222.224 (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced POV paragraph from article 

message: The text indicates that RocketMail users had to change their addresses at the time of the acquisition. I know people to this day whose email addresses are *@rocketmail.com, with no ".rm" anywhere. Any thoughts on what's up there? 24.208.253.57 (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Theirs doesn't conflict with any established user@yahoo! --Pawyilee (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  @rocketmail.com
Talk:Temple Terrace, Florida

message: Some of the info in the article appears to be copied from here, fyi. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 14:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 
Talk:Apollo Beach, Florida

message: To say that the name of Apollo Beach was inspired by the U.S. space program sounds dubious, since Project Apollo was only named in early 1960, by NASA manager Abe Silverstein.  If the community name was inspired by that project, the naming must have occurred during the 1960s, not in the late 1950s as the Wikipedia article implies. — QuicksilverT @ 21:13, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 
Talk:Stuart Cloete

message: Copied from Talk:Stuart cloete, somehow my move didn't catch this! Inner Earth 21:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For a novelist of his stature, there is scant information out there. Possibly it is because his novels have become unfashionable, as, although for their time quite liberal (indeed controversial), hes used kaffir and other now offensive terms, etc. (POV). I have tried to summarise what little there is as best as possible. This is the first article I have attempted to write for the Wikipedia... and it is a work in progress. Others' contributions are welcomed wholeheartily (this is a wiki.) I am aware that much of the wording, formatting (particularly the formatting) etc. is poor. Also, I am aware much of the content requires better sourcing. Finally, I am aware that there are mistakes (ommissions and misclassificatios) in the list of works by the author. I could not find a definitive list on the internet, (will need to consult a paper library) but managed to compile this list from worldcat. I (or my mother, at least) only have copies, as far as I know, of 4 of his novels, and one of his short story collections. Unfortunately, and bizarrely, none of these have "also by" lists. Postscript: I don't know if this can be classed as a stub or not. There is quite a lot, although it is quite higgledy-piggledy and insubstantial. I personally say yes (which is why I tagged it as such,) but feel there is a need to highlight this article as a long stub. It will probably be pruned by subsequent edits, at least at first, though. (Feedback, please, especially my South African brothers.) Garble 21:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates for books and articles, as well as tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Anna Maria, Florida

message: Doesn't really belong to the town of Anna Maria. 250 miles WSW of the town would seem to indicate it should be in Florida's article, if any. Needs deletion. Student7 (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Earthquake
Talk:Alachua, Florida

message: "Alachua" is commonly pronounced two different ways. In the City of Alachua, and to a lesser extent, in western Alachua Cpounty,  is the most common pronunciation. Elsewhere,  is the most common pronunciation. For a discussion of the history of the name, see this blog post (not a reliable source in the Wikipedia sense). Donald Albury 00:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Newberry, Florida

message: The photo on the main page is of the Newberry Municipal Building, not the City Hall.  Is there a way this could be amended?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.22.203 (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Photo subtitle incorrect 
Talk:Waldo, Florida

message: According to a number of sources including AAA, this town is tops in the nation for being a "speed trap". Proxy User (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that time stamp correct? It's only now that something is being done about the alleged "speed trap." 108.246.206.139 (talk) 23:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the speed trap info over a year ago.  It's old news.  Magnolia677 (talk) 23:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed Trap 

message: I updated the census data on the city with the current numbers from the 2010 census. Jmh11c (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Census Data

message: I reverted an edit by  that removed part of the "Speed trap designation" section and renamed it. I think such a potentially controversial change should be discussed here first. - Donald Albury 19:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mr. Albury. I have been on the City Council for 10 years.  We are trying to give a city more positive outlook.  What I did, didn't change the page.  Nothing was added about the 'Speed Trap' Section. I only removed the negative portion, and left what was honest.  The city has been struggling trying to fight the negative publicity it received from the 'Speed Trap' publicity it got from AAA for years. I'm sorry you had a problem with that, but I'm trying to help the city. Let me know what else I could have done. Thanks. Glenajohnson (talk) 19:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering why you changed the portion of "Education" about the Charter school that joined the city. It was a very positive thing that happened to the city. I've been working with Wikipedia for some time. Please let me know if the standards have changed. Thanks. Glen. Glenajohnson (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replied on your user talk page. Donald Albury 23:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of large part of "Speed trap" section
Talk:Eobard Thawne

message: In Flash #350 his name is shown as Eobard Thine.  Should that be reflected in the article?  Also, can anyone provide a reference for the other Eobard version of his name shown in the article?--Rockfang (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  aka Eobard Thine 

message: I don't know which one is more correct: any speedster's fan able to fix it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.93.128.32 (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is odd and looks a whole lot like vandalism.The references even go to the same issue, which can't be right. The first looks like what happened before the Crisis- I once had that issue. (I trust this is what's called the "Silver Age"????) I have no idea what happened after, when my comicreading dropped off considerably unfortunately. Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That particular paragraph was taken care of. Vandalism of User:Nightwing100. Returned the info written from  March 15 2010. A lot more clearer and less confusing. The rest of the fictional biography seems to be intact. Arimis (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  silver age test identical to the modern age one 

message: Could be shortened?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oteta (talk • contribs) 14:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retcon history redundant 

message: I suggest a section describing the changes in the way Zoom speaks, which is now mechanical and full of Z's if I recall correctly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oteta (talk • contribs) 14:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characterization 

message: --The  copyeditor's corner 10:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edit 

message: Zythe, if an editor disagrees with your changes, you don't edit-war it back into place. You discuss it with them on the talk page. The "trivia" that you mention to me is clearly relevant to the section. Nothing wrong with giving background about that version of the character. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't disagree with my changes, you sent me a bland automessage about "not leaving an edit summary" for an obvious change, and then a way overblown "you may be banned for reverting it back" attack message when I did it again with an edit summary. The content, full of trivia about Oliver Queen's age and so on, clearly isn't how we're supposed to write about fictional characters. Please read WP:Writing about fiction.Zythe (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with it being gone. Nevermind. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring 

message: Graham87, regarding this, merge or not, shouldn't this article remain titled Professor Zoom? Flyer22 (talk) 02:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of this article 

message: There have been numerous events of disruptive editing, vandalism and edit warring on this article. Should page protection be requested? By viewing the edit history, it is clear that the consistent disruptive editing must stop. --JokEobard (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection
Talk:Aiden Ford

message: *Ford was the best character on Stargate Atlantis Season 1. It was a pity to see him leave Atlantis in Season 2. I hope he will come back in Season 3.
*I agree with you. Ford was a good character. Maybe Ford will make a comeback into the series in future seasons to come, or maybe he won't. Eitherway, its up to the producers and directors and crew to see if Ford should make a comeback into the series. Personally, I hope he does return. At least, in order to provide closure to the character itself, even if it means killing him off, or something else. --Ned Talamoa (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of whether or not anyone here personally agrees with you, please note that talk pages are for discussions on how to develop the article and are not a message board for the subject(s) of said article. Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 00:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know it's true, I know a lot of people have seen it, but I can't find any sources to verify it. When you find one, please add it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Jackson (talk • contribs) 16:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When I cited IMdB on a different page, User:Addhoc reverted it. We'll just have to hope he doesn't find out. --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 5 cameo 

message: "The Wraith-enzyme allowed Ford to immediately rematerialize on-board a Wraith-hive ship"
This is incorrect. The enzyme made Ford semi-resistant to the Wraith stunner. When captured and stored people are somehow stunned so they will be unconscious long enough for them to be imprisioned when they are rematerialized.
Ford's resistance to the stunner meant that he was immediatly conscious when being rematerialized so could fight and escape when the Wraith came to move him from where people are dropped to a cell. 
Mention of this should be removed or corrected. 81.129.124.210 (talk) 17:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rematerializing on Wraith-Hive ship 

message: No where does the article state what F.O.R.D means.  Perhaps the "F" is for "Ford" or "Francks". Or maybe the whole things stands for "Friends of Ronon Dex".  Astronaut (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  F.O.R.D
Talk:W (magazine)

message: Anyone know what became of the scan of the Katie Holmes cover of W?  PedanticallySpeaking 16:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Katie Holmes]] 

message: Since the magazine has "haute couture appeal," wouldn't it be more appropriate for the main picture of a typical cover to be of a supermodel and not pop tart Britney Spears? 70.52.231.91 22:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main photo 

message: When was the date of first publication? Why was it created? Why is it oversized? Needs a bit more historical context. --70.167.58.6 (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: According to https://fashionweekdaily.com/investor-group-karlie-kloss-and-kaia-gerber-acquire-w/ the new investors include...  Geo Swan (talk) 23:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New investors include...