Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Magnesium Phosphoricum

message: If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a separate section below.  Do not break-up my comments here.
==Raw count analysis==
* Merge/Redirect
** to Magnesium phosphate
## Tevildo   
## Uncle G  
## Nick  
## Tim Ross
## Peterkingiron (3 edits)
** to List of homeopathic remedies
## Mithent 
## TimVickers
** Unspecified target
# Bearian 
# 88.172.132.94 (2 edits) (!voted twice, both with bolded "delete", but made a merge argument)
# RDOlivaw (2 edits) (!voted delete with discounted argument, and also made merge argument)
# SeanMD80  (!voted delete per RDOlivaw) and made a discounted argument.
* Ignored for purposes of determining rough consensus
# Nick (made suggestion not directly related to the dispositioning of this article/ AFD) 
# Adam Cuerden (2 edits) <nominator> (all delete arguments discounted)
# Mh29255 (discounted keep argument)
==Rough consensus rationale==
===Discounted delete arguments===
* free of context
** WP:STUB A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. 
* Very, very short article does not even say what the substance is
** WP:SOFIXIT 
* it's questionable whether every homeopathic medicine (of which there are hundreds, if not thousands or millions) even should have its own article. 
** WP:ALLORNOTHING 
* Also, it's been in existence a year, but noone has expanded it beyond the sentence.
** WP:EFFORT
* contains no useful information, and can not be expanded much
* "Alternative" medicine that very poorly refernced throughout the net. (SIC)
===Discounted keep arguments===
* ample Internet hits for it implying notability
** WP:SET#Notability Raw hit counts do not, in fact, measure anything at all
The overwhelming consensus was to merge/redirect.  There was no clear consensus as to what target the action should be taken,  I have therefore accordingly closed this as "Merge/Redirect Interested editors should discuss elsewhere and perform the required action." JERRY talk contribs 05:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing administrator's remarks

message: ===Discounted delete arguments===
* free of context
** WP:STUB A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. 
* Very, very short article does not even say what the substance is
** WP:SOFIXIT 
* it's questionable whether every homeopathic medicine (of which there are hundreds, if not thousands or millions) even should have its own article. 
** WP:ALLORNOTHING 
* Also, it's been in existence a year, but noone has expanded it beyond the sentence.
** WP:EFFORT
* contains no useful information, and can not be expanded much
* "Alternative" medicine that very poorly refernced throughout the net. (SIC)
===Discounted keep arguments===
* ample Internet hits for it implying notability
** WP:SET#Notability Raw hit counts do not, in fact, measure anything at all
The overwhelming consensus was to merge/redirect.  There was no clear consensus as to what target the action should be taken,  I have therefore accordingly closed this as "Merge/Redirect Interested editors should discuss elsewhere and perform the required action." JERRY talk contribs 05:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rough consensus rationale

message: * ample Internet hits for it implying notability
** WP:SET#Notability Raw hit counts do not, in fact, measure anything at all
The overwhelming consensus was to merge/redirect.  There was no clear consensus as to what target the action should be taken,  I have therefore accordingly closed this as "Merge/Redirect Interested editors should discuss elsewhere and perform the required action." JERRY talk contribs 05:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discounted keep arguments