Talk:List of Celebrity Deathmatch episodes

message: Don't post the results of the fights before they get aired,please.R.Bobby
:All results posted have already been aired. There is also a spoiler warning at the top of the page. TheHornyBug 02:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No spoilers

message: I've noticed with other wiki pages that give details on episodes, there are pictures depicted from that episode. I was wondering if, assuming it's ok with everyone else, we put still images from the fights along with the rest of the episode's description...of course, just an idea--Animé Dan 13:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding pictures 

message: If anyone adds the results of a fight, they should at least try to minimize grammatical errors. I've spent many mornings at school trying to improve the state of this list. Other contriutors should try to improve it as well. Link 486 12:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm also not fond of a lot of the additional notes people are adding. The table is looking cluttered with all the notes in parentheses. Anyone else agree that we should try to keep the tables as succinct as possible? TheHornyBug 19:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When adding fight results... 

message: I've had enough of anonymous users vandalizing this article. Please protect it ASAP. Professional Gamer 21:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect This Page 

message: Are the Season 6 entries valid? I know seasons 7+ were clearly bogus, but what about Season 6? I don't want to hit good content with the mop, as it were. —C.Fred (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 6 

message: We don't need any injuries the winners received. All we need to know is if they won or not. Link 486 20:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All we need to know is who won 

message: Hey, i'm from the uncyclopedia deathmatch. So you guys have to deal with User:81.68.92.38 too huh? He keeps copying and pasting fights from this wiki and putting them on uncylcopedia and taking them as his own. With awful spelling, of course. And no matter how much other users and I tell him stop or insult him, he just continues to do it. He can't take a hint. and I agree with Link 486 , the injuries should be deleted. 165.166.192.159 03:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So.... 

message: If this section remains empty any longer, I'm going to delete it. What good is it if nobody fills it? Link 486 17:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "Fight Specialty"? 

message: I don't want his article being butchered by anonymous users anymore. We have to protect it ASAP. Link 486 13:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I don't see a bunch of reverts in the edit history, which are the edits in question? It's not like a few months ago, where editors were inserting made up future episodes. Then, the page did get protected. If it gets bad, I will protect the article, but I'm not seeing anything right now that screams for protection. (I'll be AFK for most of the evening, but I'll probably be looking back in about midnight or 1 am UTC.) —C.Fred (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please protect this page against anonymous users 

message: Since the 2008 season vandal is back, I've protected the article. If I didn't roll back far enough, and there are bogus 2007 fights in there, let me know if you can't delete them. —C.Fred (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected (again) 

message: I think the time has come for each episode to get its very own page. This article alone is way too large. Roman619 01:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your only options are to cut this down and format it better or find real world information for season articles. Single episodes will immediantly be redirected back to this list (See WP:EPISODE). TTN 01:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  As TTN states, single episodes will be redirected back to this list - your only options are to cut down what is here or seperate out to season pages but NOT individual episode pages. --Fredrick day (talk) 08:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual episode summaries and pages 

message: Please protect it now. Don't you guys know that he is eager to claim this article all of his own? Apparently, you just don't want to protect this article so that way, you'll let him do more vandalizing, rather than protecting this article. Professional Gamer (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, I see a number of edits made on 28 November from IP addresses that have not beed reverted. I'm not going to protect an article if we're getting constructive edits from IPs. The reverse of that is also true: if I see a number of anonymous edits followed by reverts - especially when the revert is noted "revert vandalism" or "rvv," then it becomes very easy to see that we're getting more noise than signal from the anonymous editors and protection is in order. —C.Fred (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, one of anonymous users stopped him from ruining it, even though he did'nt reverted it. Sometimes, he comes back and does the damage while we sit here doing nothing. Like Link 486 said, think about it. Professional Gamer (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

text: How come the list still is'nt protected? If you can't protect it, it does'nt matter how many times you try to block him. It does'nt work that way. He'll keep on vandalizing the page once th block expires. Like Link 4786 said, protect it or let him do all the damage again. Either way, just perma-ban him to end his childish acts. Professional Gamer (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The block was appropriate because the vandalism is coming from the same IP. It's a long enough block that, since he appears to be using a static IP, it should hold it for a while. One of two things will happen: if the vandalism doesn't occur again until the block expires, then it's linked to just that IP, and it'll start getting rolling six month or one year blocks. (As a matter of practice, IPs don't get indefinitely blocked.) If more vandalism comes from a new IP, then the article will get protected. The problem is that protection can lock out good editors too. And there's no point trying to figure out who it is and ban them: because the underlying editor has an indefinite block, and because the pattern of edits here is so clearly vandalism, it's a de facto ban. —C.Fred (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but the bigger problem is that he is using sockpuppetry and he comes in here sometimes and perform a surprise edits to completely wreck the list in a flash. And besides, he'll keep on messing up the lists not because Link and I were trying to warn him, but because he hates this list and tries to modify it all of his own, just to make it look "brand-new" and always willing to try and claim this as his own. What can we do about it? Professional Gamer (talk) 19:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User talk:77.163.30.115|user:77.163.30.155]] keeps vandalizing the article 

message: I just revisited Wikipedia:Protection policy, which states: "Indefinite semi-protection may be used for: Articles subject to heavy and continued vandalism." I'm going to grant that the sockpuppeteer has been conducting continued vandalism, and when it happens, it's heavy. The article is now protected so that only established editors may edit it. If a new editor has material to contribute, hopefully they'll also figure out how to request the changes at the talk page (or get an account and deploy  to request assistance).
That's about all that can be done: the last IP the vandal used is blocked, and the article is protected. —C.Fred (talk) 20:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Indefinite semi-protection

message: Hope it helps. Link 486 (talk) 15:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've started to put the fights in past-tense

message: Perhaps it's better to put links to seperate pages (each containing a season, for example) instead of having quite a large page which consumes a lot of memory and may cause exhaust to CPUs for portable viwers.Minstic (talk) 07:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division 

message: I saw the results for the Bryant Gumbel/Katie Couric fight. Bryant Gumbel did NOT die by having a chartboard collapse on him. He died after he was thrown through the chartboard AND a glass window, which sliced him up to pieces. I hope someone can correct this. Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTokuKid (talk • contribs) 23:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gumbel/Couric fight 

message: The entire episode is flawed (even before i read the Deaths section)
1. Maxine Walters was also upset by the show and also expressed her dismay when they showed footage of Barbara Streisand's death "You killed Barbara Streisand! And I was so looking forward to Yentil 2"
2. The decision to cancel the show had already been made. Johnny delievers a speech on how celebrities need the show the vent anger how americans need the show just because "we all know celebrites are pretty darned annoying." After this Senator Thurmond expresses his like for the show as well as other members of congress
3. Senator Liberman did not contradict the arrest of Stone Cold. Ted Kennedy threatened to fight, then yelled for security but Stone Cold (challenging Kennedy's authority) taunts Kennedy which enrages Kennedy to rip off his shirts/suits/...TOP? and attack Stone Cold
4. Ted Kennedy, after smashing a podium into Stone Cold, Ted turned around to the Senate who were spectating I can't tell if they're cheering Ted or booing him but Ted turns around rambling on about them always being against him that's why he attacked congress
4. I'm playing this name on ear so I can't tell Ted Kennedy smashes Senator Moorna's head in (head of NY)
   He does.  But his face was smashed in a little, so he doesn't actually die.
   --ChaosForceXXI (talk) 02:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Congressional Hearings 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but the heads of Richard Nixon, George Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln were not just put on the "Mount Rushmore" model.  Their heads landed on the model after getting decapitated.  
Also, all of them wasn't talking and sang the National Anthem.  Only Nixon's head was talking to the other 3 saying:  "How 'bout this fellows, Mount Rushmore: The way it ought to be."
--ChaosForceXXI (talk) 04:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 4th of July Special

message: Well if you have seen that fight, then you know that Fiona Apple was flattened by John Popper ending the fight.  However, she doesn't actually die.  She was just taken out.  You can tell she doesn't die when she lifts her paper thin head, looking at Mills Lane saying:  "What the hell are you looking at?"
== Character Page ==
Hey there, CelebrityDeathmatchGeek here. As the name implies, I'm a huge fan, but more to the point I believe that we should have a page devoted to the characters on the show, telling some important details for curious fans, not just a little paragraph. Plus we could also have some stuff on the "Superfreaks", you know, Cousin Grimm, Pierce McCrack, etc. Just a thought here. By the way, this is my first time editing/adding to something, so forgive me if I mess something up. CelebrityDeathmatchGeek (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiona Apple Vs John Popper

message: Hey there, CelebrityDeathmatchGeek here. As the name implies, I'm a huge fan, but more to the point I believe that we should have a page devoted to the characters on the show, telling some important details for curious fans, not just a little paragraph. Plus we could also have some stuff on the "Superfreaks", you know, Cousin Grimm, Pierce McCrack, etc. Just a thought here. By the way, this is my first time editing/adding to something, so forgive me if I mess something up. CelebrityDeathmatchGeek (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Page 

message: CelebrityDeathmatchGeek again, I am literally writing this seconds after I finished watching the second Halloween special, the one with the return of Cornbred, and I never saw the zombies explode after eating Stacy, they fought a little over the chunks of her, but no CHOMP! BOOM! SPLAT! Please edit that particular entry at next convenient time. Thank You. And once again, please excuse any and all, errors. I'm a beginner here at Wikipedia. CelebrityDeathmatchGeek (talk) 21:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halloween Special II 

message: Maxine Waters is featured in this episode as the chairman of the committee. She is wrongly depicted as a senator and doesn't die. She should be added to the featured list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.248.84 (talk) 22:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congressional Hearings 

message: So, with the news of the show being revived yet again, I decided to refer to this page (List of CDM episodes) as I try to update the show's IMDb page. As I was browsing through this wiki page, however, I noticed that someone had gone and made unnecessary changes and added vandalism. I don't know when this happened, but for now they've been changed back to how they were before (as best as I could). To prevent any further vandalism attacks, should we put this page back under some kind of protection again?
--DannyTake2 (talk) 20:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the page need protection again? 

message: Should we add the results from the fights featured in Celebrity Deathmatch Hits Germany? They were posted on YouTube last year. Or should we forget that they ever happened? After all, it was horrible. UnseenBeta (talk) 02:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Special Episode 

message: The list of episodes has a confusing and inaccurate use of the word "Featuring." It is both used for when a surprise celebrity charicature appears in a fight, as well as when a real celebrity voices themselves. For example, in the description of S4E8 "Gottfried in the Arena", the first paragraph ends with "Featuring Gilbert Gottfried," who is an actual person voicing himself. However, in the description of S4E1 "Where is Bob Costas?", the last paragraph ends with "Featuring Paul Newman and Robert Redford". These are two contradictory and vague descriptions of two different concepts that appear several different times on the list both ways. I think this could be solved by simply changing the latter phrase to "Featuring a guest appearance by [celebrity] as themself," but since I thought this might require additional sourcing or be an overall large change, I thought I would bring it here to get other opinions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genskiel (talk • contribs) 04:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Featuring Credits in Episode Descriptions