Talk:Kirby Super Star

message: I think in Revenge of Meta Knight as a main game
Your English teacher should be put in jail.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.1.247 (talk) 15:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revenge of Meta Knight

message: I've seen the man a lot of times, and even his sliding sprite, but I've NEVER seen Link or Samus, and only Mario once. It should be added that they're the rarest.
: You talking about the rock ability, right? I've seen Mario and Samus a few times each, but I wasn't even aware of Link. I think I've seen Mario more than Samus. DeathWeed
:: I don't think the Link cameo even exists. I definitely recall the Mario and Samus statues, but I never saw Link once. Maetch 18:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes me feel bad- I've never seen Mario. But I have seen Samus on numerous occasions.24.5.110.50 03:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samus Link and Mario rarest 

message: Anyone else hear about this? I've seen screens but just want to check if anyone else has seen it.--Flawful 17:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kirby Super Star DS 

message: If this game is still coming out in 2007, it only has to Monday's left to do it. (24th, 31st) JesseMeza (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still on track for 2007? 

message: The "music sample" you have there is from the Dreamland stage in Super Smash Bros., not from Kirby Super Star.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.99.113 (talk) 03:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Sample 

message: Who keeps deleting the Super Star Ultra page? Sure there isn't a truck load of information on it yet, but doesn't it deserve its own page? It keeps getting its own page and keeps getting deleted. I know it's 100% official. 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop deleting the page

message: I read somewhere that the name of the remake was Kirby Super Star Ultra.--75.85.111.141
:That's the name of the DS remake. --76.71.214.97 (talk) 01:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I've found that Nightmare in Dream Land and Super Star Ultra are quite similar. Both are remakes of older Kirby games. But why is it that Nightmare in Dream Land constitutes a separate article from Kirby's Adventure, whereas Super Star Ultra had to be merged into Super Star? Is it because we don't know the full extent of the game's content? Teamrocketspy621 (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also feel that the two should be separate articles rather then the same. --Drkirby (talk) 00:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AgreedGENERALZERO (talk) 02:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless anyone can come up with a reason not to have a septate article, I will be undoing the blanking of the old KSSU page, removing the redirect, and updating it with the new info we have.--Drkirby (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote an "edit war" message in the KSSU talk page to avoid useless discussion in it, just in case. I really do not understand why some users don't think KSSU doesn't deserve its own article, the "Nightmare in Dream Land" reason justifies it totally.SSBMboss (talk) 04:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the separate article for KSSU keeps getting removed, with many saying "It doesn't deserve it's own article.GENERALZERO (talk) 05:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

text: In many cases, remakes differ significantly enough from the originals to warrant a separate page (see Contra 4 or Bionic Commando Rearmed), however this game is not out yet, and the information on it is sparse at best.  I think a good rule-of-thumb for remakes should be to have their title re-direct to a "remake" or "planned remake" section in the main body of the original game until such time as it is actually released.  In order for something to be notable (especially as to distinguish it from a prior incarnation), more information is needed in precisely which ways it differs, rather than high-level discussion or speculation about announced new features.  My opinion is that the solution to this debate would be to wait until there is more than a paragraph or two to say about the remake before splitting it into its own article.  Once there is more information (in the form of concrete examples, screenshots, reviews, etc), I think that a new article would speak for itself. ∴Walkeraj 18:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Article 

message: I believe that Kirby Super Star Ultra has enough new content to warrant its own new article, so I am starting this survey on behalf of myself and other who wish to discuss opinions on this and why or why not it should or shouldn't get its own article
Please clearly state your position for the separating of the articles *Support to give Kirby Super Star Ultra its own article, or *Oppose to keep it combined, then sign your comment.
Because polling is no substitute for talking about it, please explain your reasons.
*Support With the 2 new sub games added (Along with 3 new mini games) updated graphics, added functionality added to the old sub games, such as bottom screen support and two player multiplayer added to Gourmet Race, are ground enough to justify the game to get its own article. In not merely a straight port, and saying that there is not enough new content to have its own article is comparable to saying Kirby's Adventure and Kirby: Nightmare in dreamland doesn't deserve to be separate (It adds updated Graphics, 1 new mode, and 3 new mini games, less then Kirby Super Star Ultra adds), or FE3 should be merged with the FF1 article, since all it does is update the graphics and adds a new chapter to the story.
Also, the large amount of content is lost between merging and making its own article, as exampled below.
*Kirby Super Star Ultra's article before remergeing: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirby_Super_Star_Ultra&oldid=229721124
*Kirby Super Star Ultra's section after the merge: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirby_Super_Star&oldid=229653176#Remake
--Drkirby (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support I support a separate article. Like the SNES article, they explain the story of each sub-game, so with new games added, we put the stories for the "Revenge Of The King" and "Meta Knight Ultra" in the article.GENERALZERO (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey for seprating the articles 

message: What does that mean?--76.173.139.63 (talk) 04:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When was this ever confirmed? Should we just remove that from the article? 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it was. In Nintendo Power's article, they stated the new Modea, but not exactly what they were.GENERALZERO (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kirby Super Star Ultra: Two new Arena modes 

message: Do you think its justifiable to add the press event done for Kirby Super Star Ultra, along with a picture of one of the Kirby Flogos?
Link to an article about the press event: http://www.wiimedia.com/news/view/kirby_flies_over_alabama_in_fluffy_pink_clouds/
--65.2.92.37 (talk) 03:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add the press event? 

message: What, it got delayed a week? How do you know? 66.203.51.193 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  :O 

message: Someone keeps reverting my edits to this article. I'm here to confirm a few things.
#About Gourmet Race being one of the main games rather than a game along the lines of Megaton Punch or Samurai Kirby: Look at the file selection screen of Kirby Super Star. When you first start off, notice that there are six stars in each file. Whenever you complete one of the main games, a number gets added to one of the stars. For example, Spring Breeze adds a "1" to a star, and The Great Cave Offensive adds a "4" to another. In the same manner, completing Gourmet Race adds a "3" to one of the stars, justifying its place as a main game (along with the fact that it adds to the completion rate displayed below the stars). Also, completing The Arena adds a small star saying "EX" below the other six stars.
#Someone wrote that there's a scene in Kirby Super Star Ultra where Marx tells Kirby about NOVA. The thing is, this scene already exists in the original Kirby Super Star, and you can see it by going to the Milky Way Wishes title screen and either wait for a short or press the X button. Plus, I added citation to the fact that Marx is responsible for the sun and moon fighting (in the original SNES version, he simply said, "The Sun & Moon are fighting. Go find NOVA," where he said, "I got the sun and moon to fight. I got you to go into space..." in the DS version.)
#If you compare the credits of both the SNES and DS versions, you'll see that Masahiro Sakurai was credited as the director in the DS version, and Shinya Kumazaki was credited in his place in the DS version.
#Sword Knight is exclusive to the DS version, as he serves as both one of Meta Knight's helpers and a playable character in Helper to Hero.
#There are a quite a few "yous" in reference to the reader. Wikipedia in general discourages this.
#The major difference to Helper to Hero and the other Arena modes (the bosses were not randomized) was not addressed in the article.
As I was writing this, user A Link to the Past just wrote on my talk page about my edits, even accusing me of ones I didn't make in the first place. If he reads this, he should be able to see most of my justifications. — NES Boy (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So basically, if I want to remove any bad content that you add, I have to painstakingly remove every single instance? Because apparently, you can't just not put that bad content in. That Sword Knight is exclusive to the DS version is absolutely, 100% unnecessary and trivial. You can't tell me that I can't revert your edits because there's a few good aspects to your edits. Like I said on your talk page, you can either resubmit your edit WITHOUT the trivia, game guide content, and original research, or leave it alone. And the header? Why does it have to end? Because you don't want to listen to guidelines and choose to ignore every single facet of quality? I reverted bad content, and if you don't like it, there's not many people who would come to your side to fight against bad content removal. - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, this has got to stop. 

message: Hello, I'm the owner of a Kirby fan site, and I compiled a (at least it seems) complete list of the differences between Super Star and Super Star Ultra, excluding obvious new features like graphics, modes, enemies, etc. since those are new additions. I thought it might be a good page to cite somewhere for Super Star Ultra, but I wanted to know: If the page is good, is it okay to cite your own website? By the way, the page is here: http://www.thechaogarden.com/popopopalace/kssu-changes.html
76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The site itself is not significant enough to be considered a reliable, secondary source, but besides that, a site owned by you cannot be cited by you due to WP:COI. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing yourself 

message: It says 28 November for the European DS release, although I can't see any other place that says this, or has the game. What's the source for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.25.249.31 (talk) 14:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also wondered about that, thanks for pointing it out. Neither IGN nor Gamekult mention a specific EU date, so I removed it. --Grandy02 (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Your complaints are understandable, but please don't use the article for them again. Anyway, I don't know why it takes so long. However, you should keep in mind that several other, more recent Kirby games also were released much later in Europe after their first release. Examples: Nightmare in Dream Land Oct 2002 in Japan and Sep 2003 in Europe (almost a year), Squeak Squad/Mouse Attack Nov 2006 in Japan and Jun 2007 in Europe (also a long gap). The only reason I can think of is that Kirby games aren't that successful in Europe (no comparison to Japan). --Grandy02 (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU Release Date 

message: An anonymous user keeps changing the release dates. We should find a source for these so we know what's correct. Gary (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release dates 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Kirby Super Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081226174059/http://fs.finalfantasytr.com:80/search.asp?query=kirby to http://fs.finalfantasytr.com/search.asp?query=kirby
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kirby Super Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DsJYk9EP?url=http://www.1up.com/reviews/kirby-super-star-ultra to http://www.1up.com/reviews/kirby-super-star-ultra
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kirby Super Star. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161013144356/http://411mania.com/games/kirby-super-star-ultra-ds-review/ to http://411mania.com/games/kirby-super-star-ultra-ds-review/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: These two images are meant in their fair use rationales for specifically and only the articles Donkey Kong Country and Beat 'em ups. Use of the images in these articles are not permitted as they
a) do not specify that in their rationales
b) are violating the rules as per WP:F
c) do not contribute or add to discussion to the article (are not necessary).
I will remove them within a few hours, if there is no reasoning as to why they're here. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 03:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason why I have these pics of DKC and streets of rage is as to augment the reason why they decided to use elements of these games, also I'm going to revert your edits TommyGu (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Augmentation (or what this is, repeating information) using images is prohibited on Wikipedia; they are able to be explained adequately in text form. Most video game articles only have two copyrighted images under fair use: the cover art and one gameplay screenshot depicting as much as it can. Those that have more absolutely require their presence as they illustrate two very different mechanics. The uses of more than one copyrighted image on this article has zero explanation and thus breaks Wikipedia's rules on copyrighted pictures (WP:F). Sorry. Revert will stay in place. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 07:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, you can't just remove improvements templates without acknowledging them. I see that you're trying to improve the article, and I will definitely help out where I can, but please remember the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks! :) ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 08:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

text: Fair-use images should be used sparingly. These images don't depict the subject of the article, and they're not necessary to convey that CGI and beat-em-ups were inspirations. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion to remove Donkey Kong Country Shot 2.png and Streets of Rage 2 action.png from this article 

message: There was a lot of Super Star Ultra content in this article, so I decided to split them into two and expand Ultra's article. In both talk pages people seemed to support the two being two separate articles, so I did the legwork and now they are. I hope that's okay. Kettleonwater (talk) 00:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kirby Super Star Ultra split