lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography

message: Would there be much support for a combined GSS template to replace the separate English, Scottish, Welsh and NI district and county templates listed here?
Having just updated them all, it's driven home what a pain in the bum they are to maintain. They draw their information from the same source. But process it in needlessly different ways.
And a combined template also has the flexibility to include any area with a GSS code which the ONS includes in its population stats, including the UK, the nations, regions, and perhaps the city regions if/when the ONS eventually includes them.
My suggested fields would be:
*GSS population
*GSS area
*GSS density
*GSS year
*GSS reference
For the rank fields, we can either keep them separate or else have combined fields but separate the data within the template. The latter is straight forward enough if you're familiar with the templates. The GSS codes are helpfully separated first by letter (E for England, S for Scotland etc.) And then use different codes depending on the type of area e.g. E12 is a region, E08 is a metropolitan borough etc.
It wouldn't be necessary to go through and remove all the old template references. The old templates can be updated to point at the new GSS templates. E.g. | E09000016 = {GSS population|E09000016}
The ceremonial county templates would need to stay as they're not included the ONS publication. Dgp4004 (talk) 10:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New GSS template 

message: When a parish shares the same name as a settlement most of us know that we almost always have 1 article for both meanings like Sutton Cheney but I'm less sure about other types of places like parks and buildings, see Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about parishes#Parishes with the same name as other types of places. The article in question is Blenheim Park which User:Dudley Miles has removed the information. I think when it comes down to things like castles and other buildings it often makes sense to have separate article though this is often weaker if the parish only contains/contained the building its self and the building's grounds but when it comes down to parks often the parish will cover/have covered a similar area to the park so its probably best combined, thoughts? Crouch, Swale (talk)  18:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The county council page for Blenheim Parish Meeting gives its website address as www.blenheimpalace.com and the information that the clerk of the meeting is in the estate office of the palace.  This intimate connection suggests to me that the parish should be covered in the article for the palace.  I expect an interesting paragraph could be written about the history and any present-day consequences. JonH (talk) 20:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parishes v other features
Talk:Field theory (mathematics)

message: The idea of "field generated by adjoining an element" is discussed in the glossary of field theory page, and notation is introduced. However, there is no useful link anywhere to help people work out what "generate" or "adjoin" means, so it might be hard for them to find that piece of information. --Dmharvey 11:24, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would distinguish between an article on Field theory, which would be about the theory itself: its history, development, main ideas, big theorems, links to other subjects; and Field, which would be about the mathematical object and associated mathematical ideas and theorems.  Deltahedron (talk) 20:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:European Hill Climb Championship

message: The FIA's official page  is pretty useless, containing virtually nothing beyond championship standings, or I'd have added more detail. For example, there's no explanation as to what the difference between "Category 1" and "Category 2" is. I hope I or someone else will be able to find such in the fullness of time. Loganberry 11:31, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Cat 1" includes Touring cars, "Cat 2" Sports cars and Open wheel cars. Both categories are divided in sub-cats (Group N, A, GT) or Group CN, Formula Three and International Formula 3000. Sorry for the late answer. --Slartibartfass (talk) 21:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: What venues does this Championship visit? Rupertlt (talk) 01:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see in 2014 FIA European Hill Climb Championship season the venues of the present edition. You can see also 2014 FIA International Hill Climb Cup season, considered the second competition just below the european championship.Rpo.castro (talk) 12:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Venues

message: Do we need a Evolution of the calendar section, like in World Rally Championship  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.26.156 (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution of the calendar
Talk:Modulor

message: some tender care needed:
^ Ostwald, Michael(2001) p146
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p17
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p20
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p36
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p43
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p56
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p52
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p115
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p53
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p122
^ Le Corbusier(2004) p131
^ Samuel(2007) p62
^ Samuel(2007) p83
^ Sekler & Curtis (1978) p158
^ Sekler & Curtis (1978) p182''
Is Samuel a book or a publisher?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.70.2.106 (talk) 23:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Samuel is the author of a book listed below in the references.  But you need to stop the nonsense edits; you're about to have a longer block for vandalism.  Have you tried reading your talk page or looking at the edit history to see why your silly edits keep reverting?  Dicklyon (talk) 23:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: since you seem to care, the article itself constitutes vandalism  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.70.2.106 (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting thesis; but I don't get it.  Dicklyon (talk) 23:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes??? 

message: Dear authors of the "Modulor” Wikipedia entry:
Concerning your article, may I cordially suggest you to read the text “The TK Theory of Visual Proportions” and, if necessary, link or cross-reference the latter article with the former.
Please contact me in case you have any doubts or questions. 
Yours, espaisNT.
--EspaisNT (talk) 10:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  an orphan wants you to help him 

message: This article should be revisited to consider the scholarship critiquing Modular and other systems of proportion in the field of architecture. These figures have contributed to an architecture of exclusion, as they are not based on the human body but rather a very specific demographic of our society.
--M4M3M2M1 (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: I deplore everyone to keep Wikipedia's neutral encyclopedic tone. I deemed the additions I reverted were politically motivated and thus not suited for this article. Do add sources to avoid adding your own subjective opinions. Flister AW (talk) 23:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please keep gender politics out of this
Talk:Agnes Baden-Powell

message: I found reference to the 1st Lone Company in the sparse article and web-page on Agnes Baden-Powell, but can't find any reference to the actual company. Is this a Girl Guide equivalent of the 1st Gilwell Scout Group? Horus Kol 09:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid this isn't the same as the 1st Gilwell Scout Group, as far as I understand. At the time, the Lone companies were made up of girls living far apart. These groups enabled girls with no other Guides nearby to participate in Guiding. The 1st Lones had members throughout Europe and they communicated by newsletter. Occasionally they met up for activities, such as camping. You are correct that the company started in 1912. Lone Guiding still exists in many countries, including the UK, but their organisation has changed many times. Kingbird 23:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, I see - a bit like the Deep Sea Scouts worked - do you know where we could get some more information on Lone Companies? Horus Kol 11:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Countries like Australia, New Zealand and Canada have information on the internet about their Lone activities. I'd be able to contribute a paragraph or two on the early days of 1st Lone, gleaned from a book on Guiding history. Do you think that the 1st Lones deserve their own article or that they should be one section in a larger article on Lone Guiding? I am tending toward the latter at the moment as there isn't a lot of information available. Kingbird 16:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can get a couple of paragraphs on the 1st Lone Company, then I think it should be kept as a section in the history of Lone Guiding - if there is more than that available, then a seperate article. It would be good to have either article, in any case. Thanks Horus Kol 08:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've pulled together some information and started an article at Lone Guides. Kingbird 19:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[1st Lone Company]]
Talk:John Gabriel's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory

message: Please provide proof of this theory's existense, and also its notability - why should it have an article? Harro5 11:42, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
This appears to be an actual theory proposed about a year ago that has been passed around the internet and is achieving popularity.  I'm not sure if it has achieved sufficient notability yet, however.  It would be best if someone who knows something about internet memes would look into this.--Sophitus 11:50, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
although it's only my opinion, i think it's sufficiently deserving of an article.  removing the deletion notice.  --69.1.7.5 01:04, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Australian legal system

message: From a quick read the content(although it is uncited) is almost entirely covered in Law of Australia already, any other details can be merged into this article.
Once done, Judiciary of Australia can be set as a redirect to Law of Australia#Judicial system. Aeonx (talk) 01:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge of [[Judiciary of Australia]] into [[Law of Australia]] 

message: *Environmental policy of Australia redirects to this article, but this article does not discuss Australia's environmental policy. Should any of this information be added to the article? Jarble (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No information about [[environmental policy of Australia]]? 

message: I have added an intro as this section had an oblique start, jumping straight into the US Supreme Court. Supcmd (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Common Law

message: According to Australia's Parliamentary Education Office, there are three types of laws: statute law (made by parliament), delegated law (made by government ministers or departments) and common law (made by courts).  As it stands, this article describes statute and common law, but has no mention of delegated law.  Any comments on whether it should be added?
 Gronk Oz (talk) 12:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delegated law?
Talk:Felix Perez Camacho

message: I removed this bit from the re-election paragraph, as it was uncited POV:
"However, his hopes of winning might have depleted due to poor public image.  For example, Guam's archaic sign law forbids political signage on private property.  His administration, through the Department of Public Works, has enforced the law vigorously, yet he was the first to put up oversized signs of himself at his campaign headquarters."
El Krem 16:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 19, 2006 
Talk:MYMP

message: I really like listening to the MYMP band.  As I am not privy with its history and with Juris and Chin's personal life, I really don't know what I will put here. :)
[ simon.cpu ]
But MYMP used to have a third member, right? Why can't you mention anything about him? - 上村七美 | talk 13:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WHat's his name? --Howard the Duck 05:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I gathered, MYMP used to be a four-member, all-male band, before being fronted by Nina and then Juris. Here's the link to that article: . BTW, the third members name is Mike Manahan. - 上村七美 | talk 14:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Statement of changes in equity

message: this article still can be expanded a bit. An explanation how equity issue is reflected on the retained earnings statent would be nice to have --Maxx.T 12:14, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - at least stock issues are now mentioned. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Material allegedly from self-published sources have been removed, per this. I think that tagging for deletion at this time isn't the best option because the article has a neutral tone and doesn't look obviously problematic. I think tagging with UNSOURCED is sufficient, so I have made this change. Pine✉ 09:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the SPS, check the publisher.  A document sourced entirely from an SPS sets off massive alarm bells about non-standard theoretical conceptions.  No indication of notability. It is still eminently deleteable.  I'm giving it a fortnight. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: Currently, Statement of Changes in Equity redirects here, as if those two statements are the same.
Yet, according to some articles (as this and this) those two are two different financial statements.
Also, the most reliable and professional source for accounting - the IFRS - calls this statement: "Statement of Changes in Equity",
and when Retained Earnings are mentioned in the name of a statement it is in "Statement of Income and Retained Earnings" (See: IFRS Module 6).
I think that the article as it is now is a mixure of both (different) statements, so we must either:
# Decide which of them this article is talking about, make some adjusments, then create another article for the other.
# Change its name as I proposed (since that is the name in IFRS) and then let the article describe the equity statement. Orielno (talk) 16:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've requested the name change as this page should be moved to reflect the articles content ThinkingTwice contribs | talk 15:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing this article's name to "Statement of Changes in Equity"
Talk:Matsuyama, Miyagi

message: Matsuyama, Miyagi should not redirect to Matsuyama, Ehime.
*Support - there seems to be only one Matsuyama in Miyagi, so convention would be to not disambiguate by district.  Redirecting to Matsuyama, Ehime is plainly incorrect. -- Rick Block 13:53, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Innocenti De Tomaso

message: I would call this page "Innocenti 90" and redirect "Innocenti 110" and "Innocenti 3C" to it.  It was never really called the "De Tomaso", right?  --SFoskett 12:38, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
: No, it wasn't, De Tomaso was the performance model only, but 90 referred only to the 1.0 L version using the BMC engine. I've seen magazines from the late 70s and early 80s refer to the car generally as Innocenti 90/120. When the car adopted the Daihatsu engines in place of the BMC, the model became officially known as the 3C. But 3C is wrong because the BMC versions used four-cylinder engines. Either 90/120 or 3C with 90, 120 and De Tomaso as redirects. --Pc13 14:39, 2005 May 27 (UTC)
*How (if at all) does this material relate to the De Tomaso article - neither links to the other - but they are both about Italian car stuff...weird.  SteveBaker 19:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Straight man (disambiguation)

message: Interesting that Chandler from Friends shows up under the fictional characters list, but Gary Sandy of WKRP is on the real people list. I suggest that if an actor plays the straight man in more than one role, s/he be listed on the main list. Otherwise, list the character on the fictional list. This would place Chandler, Mindy McConnell and Andy Travis on the character list. Does this make sense? -Freekee 06:07, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional vs. non-fictional 
Talk:A151 road

message: This article, particularly the 'Description' section and the footnotes, is still in the process of construction. (RJP 12:58, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The information on geology is interesting, but would it not fit better on the village pages than the description of the road?  Is it a normal part of a road page?--Brunnian (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology 

message: The section from Stamford Hill to Bourne crossroads to Spalding Road is no longer A151.  
With the construction of the Bourne Bypass the route round the south-western quadrant, a few tens of metres up the A15, and then round Cherryholt in the South-eastern quadrant is now designated A151, and West Road, West Street, and Spalding road in town are the B1193.
--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 23:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bourne bypass 

message: So, according to Wikipedia:HTML_5#cite, the  tag is supposed to include the title of the work and other contents of the citation itself. On this article, the  tags don't do that; they only enclose the word "Note" and the ID number, which is apparently semantically invalid HTML. You're right that WP:CITEVAR says not to change the citation format needlessly. I think in this case, that means that this page should keep the list-defined references, but to be valid HTML from what I read on Help:List-defined references that should be done with <ref> tags. That page also says that reference IDs should be names, not numbers, to prevent confusion and avoid the need for manual renumbering. In this article there are IDs like fn_(8a), which I think is showing the problems with renumbering. -- Beland (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  cite tags
Talk:Smith's Bible Dictionary

message: I removed Category:Study Bibles...the page as is doesn't really claim the Smith's resource (with which I'm not very familiar) as a study Bible, but rather as a Bible dictionary.  I could be wrong, but maybe some more explanation on the page is necessary before we replace the category.  KHM03 13:36, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Study Bibles category
Talk:Fundamental theorem of Galois theory

message: I may be missing something, but in the discussion of the cube roots of 2, it was stated that f(x) = w *x is an automorphism.  I was under the impression that the automorphism had to map rationals to rationals, so that w = w * 1 = f(1) = 1.  How, then could be w be defined as one of the complex roots?  Could you clarify this part of the writeup? (or am I being stupid?)
CharlesTheBold 01:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say that f(x) = w*x for all x; it says that f(\theta) = \omega \cdot \theta , where \theta is a cube root of 2 and \omega is a primitive cube root of unity.  Plclark (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing logic, or my problem? 

message: In the example section it says: "Each such automorphism must send √2 to either √2 or −√2, and must send √3 to either √3 or −√3".  Why is this?  It seems like sending √2 to √3 and vice versa (simultaneously) would still fix a.  Maybe we could add a sentence or link explaining this statement? Luqui (talk) 07:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The automorphisms in G can only permute the roots of any polynomial. (See Lemma 18.3 in Algebra, A Graduate Course by I. Martin Isaacs.) So G permutes {√2, -√2} (the roots of the polynomial X2 - 2) and {√3, -√3} (the roots of the polynomial X2 - 3). I added some explanatory text. Bender2k14 (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing detail in example section 

message: The elements of the group described in example 3 take the same form as geometric cross-ratios.  I think they should be cross referenced somehow. — Anita5192 (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment it is referenced indirectly; if you click on the link J-invariant#Alternate Expressions you'll immediately see the same set G and the reference to cross-ratio. MvH (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a direct link to six cross-ratios. The link says G isom S3, so the the argument for G isom S3 (the action on 0,1,infinity) is not needed anymore. MvH (talk) 13:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!  I think the connection is clearer now. — Anita5192 (talk) 04:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 3 and geometric cross-ratio
Talk:Allele frequency

message: Does anybody recognize the equations in "The effect of mutation" section? I added a cite box but accidentally submitted without an edit message. – monolemma t – 17:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The effect of mutation 

message: 2nd line says "Specifically, it is the fraction of all chromosomes in the population that carry that allele." but consider a species with 28 pairs of chromosomes and only one pair has the gene with the allele in question. Presumably it should read "Specifically, it is the fraction of the relevant genes in the population that carry that allele." ? - Rod57 (talk) 17:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition seems wrong 

message: waves 41.115.64.86 (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  physics
Talk:Crash

message: There's a reference to JG Ballards novel Crash in the section mention the film adaption of said book, but there is no mention of the novel itself. Procrustean 02:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

message: One definition in the "Disambiguation page" of "Crash", namely "Sudden events", is wrong. 
: Only very few of all aviation accidents and incidents (airplane crashes) are "collisions". Therefore, airplane crashes have to be listed separately from "Collisions". 
: The required change could look this way: 
* Collision, an impact between two or more moving objects
** Traffic collision, also known as a car crash
** Mid-air collision between aircraft 
* Airplane crash, see Aviation accidents and incidents 
:--Uli Elch (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty definition
Talk:Centenary College of Louisiana

message: What is the origin of the name Centenary?  Does it refer to a hundredth anniversary of something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.225.17.141 (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 

message: These lists are long and they contain few people of encyclopedia-level significance. I propose cutting them. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidents