lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stadium New Zealand

message: Oh god not here too. Will everyone shut up about this thing?
An excellent point!  Perhaps one that deserves mention in the article - this is a controversial topic enjoying a great deal of airtime in NZ at the moment.  Some might also argue it is an unnecessary debate as only the government appears to be behind the initial Waterfront proposal.
:Who said? Most surveys etc show quite a lot of people support the waterfront proposal. Not a majority perhaps but it's definitely not 'only the government' Nil Einne 08:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And certainly not topic unworthy of Wikipedia. Even if it never gets built. MadMaxDog 11:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. You may not like the fuss about this proposed stadium. However the fact that there has been such a fuss and you're telling everyone to shutup suggests we do need an article. Nil Einne 12:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Value of article

message: I have removed the deletion tag applied to this article at 27 November 2006 by User:203.109.177 No reason was given for the proposal to delete.  See discussion above RE: importance of article. Goldfinger820 00:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? It's an informative article on a matter of considerable debate in New Zealand in November 2006. That debate isn't over yet (although this proposal is pretty close to being dead), but even when it is over, the article still has value for poeple considering the history of the matter or looking at similar stadium proposals. You may have been sick of the debate from the beginning (I see that the first comment on this talk page was from the same IP address), but there are over 1.5 million other articles on Wikipedia for you to read instead.-gadfium 20:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well said Goldfinger820 23:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: And some people at my work (we are involved on the periphery of the planning) noted that government may just be raising the costing problems on Eden Park now to nudge them back... okay, that IS my wishful thinking ;-) But anyway, just because a matter is 'settled', is no reason to delete it. We don't delete articles on athletes who lost their last big game, either. MadMaxDog 05:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Uuuuh, they ARE on here? Just look at articles like this one... MadMaxDog 07:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: tag edit

message: Is the issue totally over now? Is there still a hope for the waterfront stadium at all? Narrasawa 04:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing bureaucratic inertia, and the risks any politician runs if he brings it up again: no. The issue is dead, and all the talk about waterfront access won't help - there will be containers there for 15 years+. MadMaxDog 05:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Future?
Talk:USS Hunchback

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
#:: </div>
I'm sorry, but I am going to have to fail this article. For one, there are only 3 references, and each paragraph should be referenced. Also, the article is very short and does not contain enough information. It is very well written, however, and it is a good start to a good article, but renominate it once these issues have been dealt with. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 13:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA-Failed

message: This article is not meeting criteria 3 - the lead section is very weak. Criteria 2 is questionable based on the length of the article. Brad101AWB (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class fail
Talk:Action Man (TV series)

message: I was wondering if there was any canon connection between Alex Mann of the 2000 CGI series and Axel Manning of Alpha Teens on Machines, other than the similar names (Alex Mann = Axel Manning) and behavior?  --Hecko 00:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to [[A.T.O.M.]]?
Talk:Revere Beach

message: Merging in Revere Beach, Revere seems uncontroversial to me but I thought I'd throw it in as I was passing (working on Revere). (Emperor 19:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I'm in SF. I came here from a Globe story in which a great working class cultural institution too mysteriously goes belly up;  "deteriorates", as the website coyly says. Wikipedia has to be more than a PR handout if it's to win back the respect it has been losing. What happened? Did the GI bill make it possible for the middle class to move to the suburbs? Where is Revere Beach in relation to downtown? It is legal, by the way, to discuss demographic changes when they're backed by statistics.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Profhum (talk • contribs) 
:By all means, feel free to [ make any such changes] you feel would improve the article.--Loodog 17:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Deteriorate?" Self censorship

message: I have done some deep digging on the grand opening of Revere Beach; I found there never was one. There were an estimated 45,000 people at the beach July 12, 1896; while the July 13th issue clearly explains how people flocked to all local beaches that day due to an extreme heatwave, there is no mention of a grand opening at Revere Beach.
All evidence shows that the work to clear the structures from the sand and to move the tracks of the Boston, Revere Beach, and Lynn Railroad from Railroad Avenue (the future Revere beach Boulevard) was not started until after October 1st (when the state officially took ownership).
In the United States, Revere Beach is in fact the "first to be purchased by a state strictly for public usage"; however, there is some debate as to it being the first public beach, in terms of the public being allowed to swim there - there are claims by other places, such as Soundview Beach and St. Augustine's Beach, that they came first.
However, as early as July of 1845, the Robinson Crusoe House, located at the Point of Pines estate, was the only structure standing on the entire Chelsea Beach. This establishment was open to the public, which would make it very believable that swimming took place. So Chelsea/Revere Beach may very well be I'm trying to find evidence of activity at other beaches.
As for an official birthdate, the state took ownership of the beach on October 1st, 1896.
https://reverebeach.com/history/how-old-are-you-really-revere-beach/ Bassman968 (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on the first days of Revere Beach
Talk:Radhouane Charbib

message: He was measured by Guinness on April 22–23, 1999 (See the 2000 edition), so that's the date he assumed the title of the tallest living person. His predecessor was Ri Myong-hun, measured at 2.35 m (7 ft 8½ in) by Guinness cirka 1997 (couldn't find an exact date; I've seen his entry only in the 1998 American paperback edition). I found his birthdate here, but I'm unsure of his place of birth: when I first read of him (in late 1997 or early 1998), the article mentioned Ras Jebel (no article in the English language Wikipedia, but can be found on the French; official site can be found here, again in French) as his home town, but I don't know if he was born there. Another article in 1998 gave his weight at 166 kg (366 lb). --Anshelm '77 13:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jo Portman

message: The statement "it is unknown whether or not Adam complied with her request" is not original research; it is simply an accurate description of the end of the episode. There is a conversation in which Jo asks Adam to kill her so she will not be tortured, and at the end of the episode, when they are rescued, it is unclear whether or not he has complied with her request. -Juansmith (talk) 10:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research tag
Talk:Puget Sound Naval Shipyard

message: The article has several photos, but additional photos could improve the article.  Including a photo of the "hammerhead" tall green crane, mentioned early in the article as being especially prominent, would help. doncram (talk) 17:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My wife and I were flying past a few months ago; she snapped a few pics.  I've added one to the page.  Jelson25 (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos needed 
Talk:Pullman, Chicago

message: Does the lead image for this page have to be the area map? Surely there are more identifiable images of the town/area of Pullman that could make the lead more interesting. Any thoughts?--Eva bd 02:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Queen Elizabeth Hall

message: It is embarrassing that this monstrosity is named after the Queen. If it were named after me I would feel angry and insulted. It should be renamed to something suitably dull - though only as a temporary measure pre-demolition. Luwilt (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: An insult to the Queen
Talk:History by period

message: This article is intended as a synopsis + list survey and will serve as the Main article for both the commons and En.wp :Category:History by period pages... which missing state, lead to it's creation.
The related Historical era or eras (Currently redirects to the list of page), the list which generated the initial bulk of the article and related matters need to be in general cleaned up, organized and mutually co-ordinated with one another. 
Best regards //<B>Fra</B>nkB 18:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genesis Rationale

message: The articles for Modern history and Contemporary history set 1945 as the start year for Contemporary history. This timeline sets it in 1914.
Can you, guys, solve this? I am not a Historian. I do not hold the necessary credentials to so so.
Best regards!
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict with other articles - Contemporary History 

message: What is the liner period of history 103.158.178.107 (talk) 03:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Fårö

message: The fact, that the access to Färo was restricted to foreigners results to conclusion, that there were ( or even are) military installations. What kind of installations were these?
-- The kind that had signs saying it's illegal to photograph, depict or describe. Probably not relevant any more but...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.211.184.155 (talk) 20:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Military installations at Färö
Talk:Fort Niagara

message: *Merge - article is small and related to Fort Niagara.  Octopus-Hands 18:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Hauntings? Seriously? You guys know that ghosts aren't real, right? Why would this be a section in Wikipedia? 2607:FEA8:4B62:2900:2572:E47D:79F1:611E (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hauntings?
Talk:Stanislas Dehaene

message: Dehaene did not found numerical cognition, though he is a major player in the field.  One could argue that is was founded by the Greeks or earlier, though in a modern sense, psychological study of the number sense goes back to Moyer and Landauer in 1967--though one could easily argue that there were earlier works than this.
Also, we should note that he played a large part in the discovery of several psycho-numerical effects including the SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) effect as well as several psycho-numerical models (the "triple-code " model). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilberg (talk • contribs) 
: You're right, there are certainly previous studies, or else Dehaene wouldn't have had very much to write about in his book.  I've changed that from "helped to found" to "popularized and synthesized" which is more correct, but which also notes his fundamental role in the development of numerical cognition as a coherent, unified field of study.  If you would like to help out, I would welcome any comments/suggestions.  Edhubbard 19:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Julius Schaub

message: Thank you to whoever wrote this. It needs minor edits by a native speaker of English. -24.4.26.116 (talk) 21:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Needed

message: I've spend my night improving (and expanding) the article as best I can and have nominated it for GA-status. Cheers, Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 23:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 31 March 2015
Talk:Tibialis anterior muscle

message: I don't really know what "draft" means, or why there's a separate article.  However, some of the information there looks good and should be used here. This topic is beyond my breadth of experience. johnpseudo 18:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Arcadian 02:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Tibialis Anterior Draft
Talk:Voyageur dollar

message: Hi Everyone. It saddens me to say I uploaded a copyright violation. The violation is the image for "Canadian Voyageur dollar" in this article.
I did not find license info on the Canadian Mint (CA Mint) site. I assumed the image was public domain or available under fair use. I wrote to the CA Mint to clarify. The CA Mint responded with their license terms at CA Mint Intellectual Property. It looks CA Mint will license to Wikipedia under Educational Use or General Use, but it requires an application and $350 fee.
I did not upload images for other Canadian coins. I only uploaded the Canadian Voyageur dollar.
I do not know how to delete the image from Wikipedia's storage.
My apologies for the transgression.
Jeffrey Walton  (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:List of independent UK record labels

message: What about companies owned by the bands themselves?  I'm thinking of Apple, Track, Swan Song, etc - Stevehawker 18:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please read the following pages WP:NOT#LINK and WP:EL before adding external links to this list.  If the label is indeed noteable, then the link would sit on the label's own article page and not here. Lugnuts 09:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to article editors 

message: This clearly needs to be addressed in this article, too many are not notable at all. Rob Riv (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fence Records current doesn't have an article, so therefore notability hasn't been established.  Once the article has been created (and it asserts notability), then it can be added. Lugnuts (talk) 07:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Many lists use "enwiki article exists" (no red link) to simplify the maintenance. Generally I like this, it's good enough for software. For record labels I'm less sure, RWG Records exists, also as d:Q60492205, in essence on my say-so (sourced on Wikidata), not (yet) good enough here. OTOH soon (redirect suggested) Coptic Cat might exist, and could be arguably notable here, the "Coptic Cat" label is mentioned on 15 enwiki articles, but nobody bothered to add it on Wikidata so far. –84.46.52.44 (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Notability
Talk:The Amazing Race Asia

message: It says in the article that the two-minute rule is unique to the amazing race asia. I remember reading a forum post once that said someone found a clue left behind by the amazing race USa. It did actually say "Two-minute rule applies here" on there. 
I don't have the source anymore
80.60.212.163 01:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two minute rule 

message: When was the actual race run? During which month(s) of 2006?
Troy88 15:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of race 

message: I deleted the results section. Please do not put it back. Results are for season-specific pages, not the main article. Thank You Anchorage 18:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results 

message: Sections needs to be trimmed.  It's basically list-cruft and violates WP:NOT. 
--Madchester 17:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure which part did you mean, can you list out? Thank you. --Aleenf1 00:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Zabrina and Joe Jer were the first all Female team to win The Amazing Race. However Joe Jer was not able to attend the memories edition because she went on a trip to Columbia.
Natuw 13:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Female Team 

message: The Philippines was visited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr roces (talk • contribs) 
:Are you sure, please check properly first in official website. --Aleenf1 04:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Philippines was visited

message: I live in Australia and have not seen the show. What language/s are spoken by the participants? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.196.56 (talk • contribs) 
:English, all participants require to know English (at least simple) as basic. --Aleenf1 05:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language spoken on show. 

message: I noticed that the double-length legs in season 2 and 4 were treated differently than the double-length leg in season 1. But upon checking those episodes, they weren't really treated differently.
In season 1, the "To Be Continued..." title card, and the "You're the Nth team to arrive", "The race is still on", "This leg of the race is not over yet" phrases were used by the host.
In season 2, "You're the Nth team to arrive", "It's not a pit stop", "The race is still on" phrases were used.
In season 4, the term 'Virtual Pit stop' was used to contrast it to a 'Pit stop', and the phrases "This leg is not over" and "The race is still on" were used. And while prizes were consistently given to the first place teams on other pit stops, none were given at the virtual pit stop.
The host's script for TARA is quite strict, using the phrase "You are team number N" when checking teams in at pit stops. So for now, I'm editing these parts to reflect a "double-length, but single leg" in those pages. Albertdaniel222 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virtual Pit Stops
Talk:Cranleigh School

message: impressive alumni but a very short article. The school deserves more. An infobox? A picture? some history? Victuallers 16:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: What does " semi co-educational. " mean?
::::Johnbibby 18:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  semi co-educational. 

message: In the last week Cranleigh School has been in the local and national media due to disciplinary matters. As a result I believe that some recent edits of this page have been sensationalised and hold inaccuracies. I believe that protecting this page from opportunists who wish to spread inaccuracies would be advisable and give time for someone to come and correct the page in due course.
:Closed: I have requested protection at WP:RfPP, please make any future requests for protection there. Danski454 (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi Protect Measures
Talk:Islam and alcohol

message: I think this article contradicts itself:
 In Islam, Alcohol is forbidden to drink, but is allowed to be used for medical and other purposes.
 Several Qur'anic verses prohibit the use of alcohol.
The first line says that it can be used for medical and other purposes (which other purposes? cooking?). The second line says it is prohibited. If it is prohibited - it can't be allowed for medical or other purposes.
Ozzykhan 18:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. --Striver 19:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Let's put an end to this, drinking pure alcohol or alcoholic drinks whatever the concentration of alcohol is prohibited. One can drink alcohol, only if it's going to save him/her from death. Also for medical purposes alcohol can be used, if there's absolutely NO other material to use for that purpose. For example there are excellent iodine containing compounds readily available for antisepsis thus using them must be preferred to alchohol for muslims. I'll change the article soon too.--Suleyman Habeeb 14:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: The lines 'Everything in the Quran has a healthy and practical purpose...' don't have a Neutral Point of View and should be deleted, or at least significantly modified. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.52.71.173 (talk) 05:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non NPOV
Talk:Reformed Church in Hungary

message: :My family is from Kolozsvár (Cluj). In my family, it is not customary to genuflect or use candles. Nor is it customary to display crosses, not even in church or in cemetaries. Flowers may be used (instead of candles) to honor of the dead. Also, it is customary to abandon the celebration of the birthday in favor of celebrating the "name day." Names are assigned to a certain calendar date. Everyone with the same name celebrates their life on the same day.
:(I hope this serves as an invitation for others to come forward with their respected family practices and a show of denominational diversity.)
Those praxis are interesting, if someone find a way to edit and publish back on the main article.
--Leonardo Alves 18:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Practices

message: Is it common for a presbyterian organised reformed church to have (elected) bishops? -- Bancki (talk) 08:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polity: Presbyterian
Talk:Author-date system

message: Harvard referencing is now a redirect to Author-date referencing, so this title is now a double-redirect.  Please fix the redirect.  --Russ (talk) 21:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: changed. — Carl (CBM · talk) 22:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  retargeted 

message: Author-date referencing is now a redirect to Parenthetical referencing, so ... (sigh).  I just hope no one else picks yet another title. --Russ (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and fix't.  Cheers.  --lifebaka (talk - contribs) 19:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Again 

message: On this page, could the following text:
Category:Protected redirects
...please be replaced with the following text:

...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Thanks!
Steel1943 (talk) 06:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 12:08, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 12 October 2014 

message: -per WP:REDCAT:
#REDIRECT Parenthetical referencing

 2003 LN6 20:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unprotected, mooting this edit. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 11 March 2024
Talk:Marriage Law Project

message: This link is dead:
Planet Out Groups that oppose marriage for gays and lesbians promised a court fight. The Marriage Law Project and the Alliance Defense Fund announced plans to seek an injunction to block San Francisco from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. RJFJR (talk)
:So I tagged it . Anyone can do that. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know why you have put my signature next to this; I just added a WikiProject.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. Now I've fixed that. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 21:35, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link 