lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chairil Anwar

message: You must write about another side of Chairil's life, that some of his poems were not belong to him originaly but only translation.
:Go on. But some of is translation is published posthumously. He did not give any sign or note that it was only a translation.Aditthegrat 09:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this the translation by Burton Raffel, from the collection of Chairil's works that was published in the 1960's here in the U.S.? RahadyanS 13:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about "Aku"
Talk:CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder

message: The sources used in this article for making the claim that "IAF MiG-21 was also shot down by a JF-17" is taken from pro-Pakistan sources. The sources you mentioned ([125] [126]) which are from "CNN" and "The diplomat" respectively do not put the facts correctly. Firstly, CNN says "According to some reports, It may have been one of those jets that on Wednesday downed an Indian Air Force fighter plane" KEY WORD- some. They don't mention any specific report they used for this, but it probably was from some pro Pakistan report as no other media proudly claims that this is what happened (more proof for this is the second source you mentioned). Now, The Diplomat says  "According to unconfirmed media reports, the PAF military aircraft that shot down the Mig-21 Bison was an Aeronautical Complex/Chengdu Aerospace Corporation (PAC/CAC) JF-17 “Thunder” Block II multirole fighter jet" KEY WORD- unconfirmed. They themselves said that these reports are unconfirmed so it means that both of the sources you took for this claim are not saying what you framed in your article. (brief history time here) Moreover, we all know that India found the AIM-120C in its territory which proves that it was the F-16 which shot down the Mig-21 (more proof for this in the next line). Heck, in the stupid "memorial" they made for the shoot down of mig-21, it is written "This aircraft was shot by PAF F-16" THEY THEMSELVES SAID IT. So, I ask you to change this, as their is simply WAY TO MUCH proof for the fact that it was shot down by a F-16, not the jf-17. Experience31 (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-Pakistan sources for claims
Talk:

message: I'm only seeing a question mark as the article title. Is the article using a non-standard character set by chance? -- Longhair 06:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For some strange reason, this page redirects to Tengwar.  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the article once, but it's since been re-created. I'm waiting on a reply to my question above before acting again. -- Longhair 06:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: See what links to Tengwar. There's more than one article titled in this way. I'm suspecting non-standard characters. -- Longhair 06:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this is pretty stupid. I know "redirects are cheap" and all that, but who is going to search for individual Tengwar characters that can't even be inputted normally in the first place? I wish people would think before doing things like this. Adam Bishop 06:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts exactly. I've deleted the lot. -- Longhair 06:38, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: How does one enter them directly on a standard keyboard using Windows XP? -- Longhair 07:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't.  ⇒  JarlaxleArtemis 07:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Unless you download the font and change the font face of ordinary characters.  ⇒  JarlaxleArtemis 07:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Stax

message: Wow, there are a lot of differnet 'stax'.  Does anyone thing a disambiguationalllliieeee dealie should replace the article, so each can have its own?  EDIT- signature added:Lgreen 06:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the one that I was looking for is not included in the list. Stax, eurodance group who released a cover of Snap!'s "Mary Had a Little Boy".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.216.223.197 (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Callahan

message: The David Callahan listed here as a Councillor for Hawkinge is not the author of the same name.
So said the article, until I removed it just now.  I have no idea what it means by "here."  Anyone?  --zenohockey 06:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. Thank you for your revision. The David Callahan listed here is NOT the same person as David Callahan, Councillor for Sutton, London, in the UK since 2006. --FeralOink (talk) 07:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's too much verbiage in the "Publications" section cited only to the books themselves. I'm going to try to clean out anything that doesn't have independent citations, and then place the full list of the books in a standard "Bibliography" or "Books" section -- rather than as a prominent section of the References/Citations (which is basically like having two whole sections on his books). Stophorus (talk) 05:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article problems
Talk:Chevrolet Venture

message: Shouldnt weight go in the specs box (the one on the right)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dazalc (talk • contribs) 02:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  weight? 

message: Does anybody know if their glove box hatches are faulty or if mine is just weird I'm having issues with being able to re-close it after I opened it and I'm not sure if I'm looking at the latch wrong
 or what 2601:600:4380:8090:8445:C26A:9D88:40F0 (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glove box latch
Talk:William P. Yarborough

message: This is just c/p'ed from the source listed at the bottom of the page... Don't think that's too legal. Jjjsixsix 06:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The ripping and pasting of complete texts from other pages has been a problem on Wikipedia.  I reverted the entire thing to the last article written by Wiki users instead of the one stolen from another website. -Husnock 16:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's no CV. The copyed page is of US-Military and therewith in the Public Domain. I copyed again and listed the link, write a good article out of it (my english is to bad and my time to less for doing that on my own) ;). Regards, John N. 15:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: John N. is correct, it is not copyright.Travb 18:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: I wonder if Yarborough was related to Confederate artilleryman John Pelham or if his father named him after Pelham at all. --Habap 18:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pelham

message: I presume you mean Yorkshire!  Is there any evidence that he was related to the aristocratic family mentioned in the text, other than sharing an unusual surname?  My mother was a Yarborough from Yorkshire, and as a child I remember her telling me the same story, but I can find no evidence that she was related to the aristocrats. Timpontardawe (talk) 00:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: York County???

message: The antiquity stuff is a myth, they are not in the Domesday Book. See . I've removed the claim, sadly these fake claims are all to common. dougweller (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a pretty neat textbook that you found, quite amazing stuff actually.  The original source that *I* used though was Arlington National Cemetery.  I did not knowingly insert anything I thought to be false or fake.  I agree it should be removed though until we get this sorted out.  The article on his ancestor Eustacius de Yerburgh is under full scale deletion debate right now. -OberRanks (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have any doubt that you thought it was all genuine. That's an ongoing problem, and as was noted on the AfD page, there was a lot of this going on in the 19th century, and a lot of people believe in things that are Victorian fakes. Didn't you see the quote I put on the AfD page? dougweller (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  House of Yarborough claim
Talk:Top (sex)

message: This article has been merged. See Top and bottom in sex and BDSM (talk) Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 05:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

message: These terms are in widespread use. A powertop is a dude that can fuck all night and repeatedly and a total top is a guy that only tops and wont ever let a guy fuck em. Google test it, or go on craigslist men seeking men and search it or try gay.com or adam4adam or manhunt, its common gay slang. both are. in fact the homonyn to powertop: powerbottom was even used in at least one mainstream movie that i know of, "Another Gay Movie".qrc2006/email 23:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did google "powertop" and "power top" -- I don't see anything notable, mainly non-sexual references, one hit on Urban Dictionary, and people's profiles.  None of these are valid references, IMO, and a ref in one movie is not sufficient (Ass to mouth was deleted for this very reason). HalJor 23:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I notice now that an article has been created for power top that gives a different definition.  I must admit I don't understand -- we need references for each (and they are tagged as such). HalJor 17:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Powertop, total top
Talk:Priest Holmes

message: Some sources indicated that his 2005 season was also cut short by injury...Ranma9617 06:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is true. Holmes was injured this year that made him lose the last half of this season.  In fact, the injury might have made him lose his starting job consider his backup, Larry Johnson was voted to this year's NFL all star game during Holme's absence. Too tired to edit the article. --J. Nguyen 06:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Janary 2006 

message: Priest is attempting a comeback bid despite the spinal injury sustained in 2005. One ref: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp07/news/story?id=2981922 - Ageekgal 04:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Comeback Bid?

message: There seems to be a fair amount of false information on this page, it would be nice if it were to be reassessed and cleaned up.--24.28.166.68 (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  .... 

message: I suck at editing these articles, so I'll leave that to someone smarter than I, but if you want to include a section on what Priest Holmes is doing today, I can tell you he lives in San Antonio, TX and is co-owner of a local popular bar called Area 31.  The "31" is a reference to Holmes's number with the Kansas City Chiefs.  That is all explained in this article from the San Antonio Business Journal: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2009/06/08/story4.html .
I also know I've seen him a few times on Channel 4, WOAI, (NBC affiliate for SA) doing "Sports Sunday" with local sports show host Don Harris.  I tried seeing if I could find a link about that on WOAI's website but have failed.  However, I DID find a link to some articles about what Priest has been doing here in SA: http://www.woai.com/search/sitesearch.aspx?q=Priest+Holmes .
Churlskunk (talk) 01:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priest Holmes post football 
Talk:Femininity

message: The lead of the article includes content that is not supported by the body of the article, presenting us with a MOS:LEAD problem. In particular, the article is not adhering to  I propose we remove the suggestion that femininity as a social construct is an idea held only by sociologists, and I insist that we remove that there is "widespread recognition" that femininity is biologically influenced. I know, and the article shows, that femininity as a social construct is the mainstream view in multiple disciplines. I suspect, and would like for the article to show, that there is widespread acknowledgment of the influence of biology on femininity. That said, the failure to improve this article in a WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY manner has led to problems, the quickest solution for which is the changes I've proposed. Pinging , though I'd be interested in hearing the thoughts of others. Firefangledfeathers 22:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead problems 

message: I'm suggesting the addition of any number of personality statistics pertaining to personality inventories. The big 5 personality inventory is perhaps the most readily available and accessible of these. Such statistics could help to avoid a non-committal tone where hard evidence is available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:410:4301:4220:B8CA:B8A6:F10A:874E (talk) 23:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of statistics from personality inventories 

message: Could I get another pair of eyes or two on the two religion subsections, Asian religions and Judeo-Christian theology? I'm getting lots of information about what religious concepts or deities are feminine, or argued to be so, but little about how these traditions view or understand femininity. My instinct is to start trimming, but I'd love another opinion. Firefangledfeathers 03:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion subsections 

message: "Effeminate" men are not effeminate, they're just feminine, just like masculine women are just masculine. Read R. A. Hoskin's dissertation (Femme theory), it's very reliable. Effeminate men and masculine women it's just sexist femmephobic terminological double standards.Reprarina (talk) 20:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . Could you post this over at Talk:Effeminacy? It would help if you could provide some more details on which Hoskin publication you're referring to, and if other works also cover that view. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Effeminate" men
Talk:Vietnam Television

message: The sentence "Like all media of Vietnam, its programming is directly controlled by the government" is pretty much nonsense.
First, "government" is used in the US differently than in e.g. Europe. The more appropriate term would be here "state-controlled", but even that is not really true, since the major influencer of the media is the Party, not the government or "the State".
Stefan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.168.25.169 (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government Control 

message: How profound. Carrionluggage 06:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: I can't find the test pattern of VTV in the 1965-1978. But my friend said it's the same as Magyar Televízió's test pattern from 50's to 60's.--125.25.34.117 (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Test Pattern

message: Never got vandalism since it has been unprotected.--125.25.28.158 (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enough now 

message: Parts of this edit look like vandalism. This edit changes many dates, which may be correct, but it also changes: "the United States set up 2-channels .... in Saigon for the Republic of Vietnam. ...., the network operated until the fall of Saigon." to: "the United States set up 2-channels .... in Hanoi for the Republic of Vietnam. ...., the network operated until the fall of Hanoi.", which is blatantly wrong.
Also this edit contains many grammatical errors, for example "from a mountainous region" changed to "from a mountainous regional" and "There are transmitters in" changed to "There are transmission in".
I cannot revert this edit because of later edits. It needs the attention of an expert on the subject to say whivh parts of this edit are correct and which not not. Thanks. TiffaF (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism - Edit of 16:07, 14 July 2014 by 114.79.12.28 
Talk:Colorado Party (Uruguay)

message: This page seriously needs a local expert to fix it up, because right now it's status is utterly awful. Gracias, Hauser 06:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No-section comment

message: I renamed this article (along with the Paraguayan equivalent) and it got reverted. The reason I did this is that the party's name is simply a color, and not a name that should be kept untranslated. In fact, the opposing party is simply called "Partido Blanco" (that's "white party"). Interesingly enough, in this case the article was given the proper name, instead of calling it "Rødt Party". --uKER (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Britannica says: The two principal traditional political parties are the Colorado (“Red”) Party (which has had a liberal urban base) and the Blanco (“White”), or National, Party... . "Colorado Party" is also the usual form found in both news and academic sources. Per WP:COMMONNAME, there is no case to rename. Rd232 talk 00:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What you're suggesting is the equivalent of the Spanish Wikipedia listing the US parties as "Partido Democratic" and "Partido Republican"; a ridiculous and unnecessary mix of English and Spanish considering the parties' names are plain words and not proper names, and as such they should just be translated. Coincidently with this, the article for the Red Party's opposing force is appropriately called "National Party (Uruguay)" and not "Nacional Party", and its lead lists its alternate name as "White Party" and not some nonsensical "Blanco Party". --uKER (talk) 03:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the mixing of English and Spanish is a bit odd. But if that's the usual form in English for this subject (and it appears to be), then that's what the article name should be. That the usual form for other parties is different is irrelevant. Oh and for the National Party it may be that "National Party" is the usual form - it's harder to check that. But "Blanco Party" is more common than "White Party" in scholarly sources. Rd232 talk 09:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hooray for consistency. --uKER (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - consistently using the most common name. Rd232 talk 17:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Category talk:Calvin and Hobbes

message: How do I edit this page? The gallery is broken -- the "Image:The Calvin and Hobbes Lazy Sunday Book.gif" picture isn't showing up. My browser thinks the file name (the object name in the URL, really) is "Image:The Calvin and Hobbes Lazy Sunday Book.gif\", and I guess that trailing backwhack is the problem.
But when I click "edit this page" I don't see anything that makes me think the gallery should be appearing in the first place.
-- Mikeblas 06:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a category, which is an automatically generated list of pages and images that have — in this case — Category:Calvin and Hobbes in them. Feezo  (Talk) 01:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sasha Bordeaux

message: I went and changed the past tense to present tense as befits fiction. Lots42 (talk) 03:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Present 
Talk:Rose Wilson

message: Usually articles about meta-humans would have either the word 'superhero' or 'villain'. After reading the article, I'd suggest she's currently a hero, or heroine if you prefer. 64.241.230.3 19:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Character'?

message: She actually isn't shown anywhere within the game, unless it is a fan-made character. I did some investigation into this. She may be mentioned at some point, but never actually makes an appearance. I would suggest at least removing this mention.
Also, does anyone have any proof that Rose appears as an unusable card in Injustice? If someone had a screenshot of that, I would like to see.
-Rage
216.163.111.201 (talk) 09:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her appearance in DC Universe Online
Talk:GMC Typhoon

message: HMMM.... SUV AND TRUCK TWO DIFFRENT NAMES.... RETARDS
No merging you fools!--Nytemunkey 04:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge?

message: It says in the article that "All three trucks were built for GMC by Production Automotive Services of Troy, Michigan."
Which "three trucks" are we referring to here? There is the Syclone and the Typhoon. The only other truck mentioned in the article is the regular GMC Jimmy, which I image was produced by GM (also, I would assume that Production Automotive Services didn't PRODUCE the SyTy's, but rather MODIFIED factory chassis shipped to them by the factory). I would like a clarification of this "all three trucks", as it doesn't make much sense the way it's written...does it refer to a prototype as well? Wasn't there a prototype for both pickup and SUV versions? Wouldn't that make it FOUR trucks? In any case, the whole article seems a bit brief, somehow. There must be more info than this out there?.45Colt 16:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Three trucks"?
Talk:Almadén

message: I would like some feedback on the article. The original article, quite frankly, did not make very much sense to me, so i just deleted it and started from the beginning. I am concerned that this information should be as an article specifically about the mine. I could not, however, find any information about the actual city that didnt concern the mine and its history. This is also the first longer article i've taken a stab at, so any feedback in general would be greatly appreciated. let me know what you think! susanbamboozlin 07:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Article currently  reads in part The price for mercury decreased from a peak of 571 US$ in 1965 to 121 US$ in 1976 making economic planning difficult. That's interesting, but what quantity are those prices quoted for? The comparison remains valid, assuming it's accurate! Andrewa (talk) 02:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Price of mercury

message: My addition in bold: 
Due to the human toxicity of mercury and its byproducts, the mine has variously employed penal labour, slave labour, and prisoners of war over its long history. Almaden mine stopped working in 2002, due to the prohibition of mercury mining in Europe. In 2006, the mine opened to the public, who can visit the first level, 50 meters underground.
Without this sentence, the lead functions as a tourism brochure, not an encyclopedia. — MaxEnt 20:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  the whole truth
Talk:Randal Keynes

message: There is no evidence that Annie's death had any effect on Darwin's religious views, so I have removed this claim. See http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0498.2012.00256.x/abstract  Mpallen (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: little or no evidence for any effect of Annie's death on Charles Darwin's religious views
Talk:Zatara

message: I thougth he died in a Swamp Thing issue when he, Constantine, Zatanna and Mento and some other were sitting around a table holdning hans, while Swamp Thing was trying to save the world from the great evil which was waking.
I know what you mean!  That's just what the latest Wizard magazine (November 2006, issue 181) says.  They had it as moment 22 on their list of the 25 Scariest Comic Moments.  One sentence of that segment reads, "Zatara falls victim to the mystical fire, forcing a sobbing Zatanna to hold her dead father's husk of a hand as it burns." They said it was in Swamp Thing vol. 2 #50.  Plus, I don't remember seeing a Zatara death scene or any mention of Zatara's death in Crisis, so I don't know what's going on in this article. 12.75.98.158 15:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: His death

message: Aren't there Earth 1 and Earth 2 versions of this character pre-Crisis? 108.85.3.77 (talk) 01:48, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earth 1 and Earth 2 

message: I know Zatara's first appearance is notable but how about turning the main picture to something that focuses more on Zatara? Sharing his image with two thugs doesn't make much sense. I'd change it if I was 100 percent sure as to how. I am not. Lots42 (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture
Talk:Judomaster

message: One of the Judomasters appeared in Guy Gardner Warrior #29, expressing distaste over 'limbo', seemingly the dimension.
Did any of the Judomasters get stuck in limbo for a while?Lots42 04:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limbo 

message: .....underway.Bddmagic (talk) 02:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: .....and done. This article is still a bit crufty.Bddmagic (talk) 18:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyediting 