lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ilyushin Il-20 (1948)

message: I have expanded this article a little, but the problem is my source quotes specifications for what seems to be a totally different aeroplane, just about every parameter doesn't agree with those in this article:-
my source - OKB Yakovlev by Yefim Gordon
Article source - Enc of russian A/C Bill Gunston
Thoughts:-
Gordon seems to have got his marterial direct from the OKB but Gunston's source was mostly Shavrov, who, though prolific in his archiving, did make numerous small mistakes.
Discussion anyone?
Petebutt (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Gunston doesn't seem to be soley based on Shavrov, and does seem to have access to some post Soviet Archives for some OLBs (which may or may not have included Ilyushin), but Gordon is 9 years later and so may well be more accurate as it is based on later research - at a pinch I would go with Gordon - it would be handy to see just how diffent to fugures are.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Nemecek has different figures for length (17m) and span (12.59m). MilborneOne (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't say that I'm surprised, but the most I'd do would be to annotate it if you think that it's significant considering how long ago Nemecek published. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: specifications 
Talk:Maeda Ku-6

message: Support the 2022 proposal to merge this page with Special number 3 light tank Ku-Ro. From reading the pages, it seems that the Special number 3 light tank Ku-Ro was a particular aircraft within the broader project. Hence, I suggest merging that page to this one, which is also the older article. Klbrain (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the merging of this page, as to relevant information, into the article of the Special number 3 light tank Ku-Ro. That article is much more detailed and well cited. Kierzek (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 08:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:List of prehistoric hexacoral genera

message: Sorry Mark T young and user:Abyssal but the generic instruction and extinction talk plaques seem to me to be unnecessary or out of place. Basic instructions are found below every edit page or can be readily found. Moreover hexacorals (scleractinia) are far from extinct - even considering the present concerns over reef health.
Besides, the colored in Wiki intros and instructions could be a lot crisper.
J.H.McDonnell (talk) 22:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision
Talk:List of prehistoric annelid genera

message: Should perhaps be restricted to entirely extinct genera. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 09:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? The list isn't even that long. Abyssal (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of list?

message: If there is to be a Marlenite link at all, it should be to a disambiguation page. Currently, the link is redirected to a discussion of the Bolshevist Marlenites, not to the annelid Marlenites. Peter M. Brown (talk) 02:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Marlenites
Talk:Lospalos

message: Nino Konis Santana was born in Tutuala. Sometimes the district of Lautém, where both cities are, is called "Lospalos". --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 21:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nino Konis Santana was not born in Lospalos 
Talk:Vertebral fusion

message: Gimme time to expand, I think there's reliable and notable sources.  , , ,  as a start.  WLU (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Prod removed, will still try to expand this week.  WLU (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No prod
Talk:List of prehistoric bryozoan genera

message: The lengthy section, Naming conventions and terminology, is not integral to the purpose of the page, which is simply to provide a list of  Paleozoic bryozoan genera, and should be removed. The first sentence in the section, "Naming conventions and terminology follow the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature." can just as well be added at the bottom of the introductory paragraph. How about it.
 JM   (my talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous Section
File talk:PreparedPacu VillaTunari.jpg

message: If you look at the teeth those are obviously not pacu teeth. - comment left by 216.57.96.1 19:12, 15 August 2007
I agree with the anonymous above. As far as I know, the pacu does not have pointed teeth.  Piranha do. 205.238.230.245 (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paeonia obovata

message: The following text was removed:
:"In China the vernacular name of the typical subspecies is 草芍药 (cǎo sháo yào), meaning "grass peony", while ssp. willmottiae is known as 拟草芍药 (nǐ cǎo sháo yào), "false grass peony". In Russia this species is called Пион обратно-овальный (Pion obratno-oval'nyy), or "inverted egg-shaped peony". In Japanese, it is known as ヤマシャクヤク (yamashakuyaku), meaning "mountain peony"."
That's fun stuff to know. It was unsourced but is probably good faith. --SB_Johnny | talk✌ 02:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All plants have many names in different foreign languages. If every article listed such multiple names it would rapidly become a lot less fun, and a lot more tedious! Darorcilmir (talk) 08:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun but unsourced info lost
Talk:Henrik Kreüger

message: :To all editors-
*Do we have anything about his early life?
*He worked as teacher at the Institute - how many years? from when to when?
*was considered to be one of the leading experts in concrete steel constructions in Sweden early 1900 - by whom?
*research,teaching, headmaster at the institute - if possible, lets consolidate this into one seperate section
:This seems like a promising article, so thought I'd add a few thoughts to it. Will start work on it as soon as possible. Happy editing,xC | ☎  21:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article is changed. More detailed information about Henrik Kreüger is not available. Important fact is that he helped the construction company Kreuger & Toll to get the business running when Ivar Kreuger and Paul Toll formed the company in 1908 and he was responsible for the basic engineering calculations for a number of large prestigious contracts the first years such as the Stockholm Stadium, 1911-12 and the department store Nordiska Kompaniet (NK). How many years he worked for the company as a consultant is not clear, probably at least up to 1915. Without Henrik Kreüger, who also introduced engineer Paul Toll for Ivar Kreuger, the company Kreuger & Toll would probably never had been founded. Lidingo SWE (talk) 08:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a thought
Talk:1792 Bourbon

message: It is difficult to argue that bourbon is not notable. When liquors are concerned, it is probably difficult to make a clear line - some are as mass produced as Wild Turkey, some are more rare like Talisker, or Knob Creek in the US. Still, by comparison to wine market, where also niche quality products are covered (e.g. Château Angélus) it is obvious that 1792 is notable. It is, after all, the official toast bourbon of the Kentucky Bourbon Festival, and a brand praised in many reviews. If the amount of information is the major concern, we should also admit that many bourbons started from an even modest stub stage, e.g. Eagle Rare, or Woodford Reserve.  Pundit|utter 22:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This particular brand was involved in a trademark dispute that was covered in local and national media.  --Clay Collier (talk) 04:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Let's just get this out of the way, shall we? "This bourbon is positioned as a super-premium one,[2] and the pricing policy makes it a competitor to Knob Creek or Woodford Reserve. This reflects the general trend in bourbon production, resulting from competition with single malt whisky,[3] which makes small batch bourbons a big business.[4]" I mean—this article is a joke, and keeps people from taking Wikipedia seriously as an online encyclopedia. 
2601:140:8302:E260:7844:690C:14AE:217A (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: When each and every statement is sourced to independent, third-party sources, no, it isn't. oknazevad (talk) 19:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: At least it is sourced, but really I think very few people would use "super-premium" to describe 1792 (~$40 for a 750 ml bottle) or Knob Creek ($24) or Woodford Reserve ($30). That's a bit more than Jim Beam black label ($20), but still very mainstream. There are a lot of bourbons priced at two or three times that much or more. Consider Blanton's, Pappy Van Winkle, Willett Family Reserve, George T. Stagg, Hancock's Reserve, etc. – not to mention the top-tier expressions (e.g., single-barrel and 18+ year-old variants) of various brands. I changed "super-premium" to premium. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking around a bit more, I find that some sources (e.g., Shanken) define "super-premium" bourbon as the neighborhood of $25 or more (for a 750 ml bottle). By that definition, this fits. The higher bracket (roughly north of $50) has been called "ultra-premium" or "luxury". So if someone wants to change it back from premium to "super-premium", I won't object. But I guess I won't do it myself since I personally wouldn't use that term for a $40 product. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This is an ad.
Talk:All-left.net

message: Currently, this page links to the page on left-libertarianism.  However, if a page specifically for the Alliance of the Libertarian Left (which also currently links to left-libertarianism is ever written up, then I would recommend re-redirecting this page from left-libertarianism to the Alliance of the Libertarian Left.  Allixpeeke (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Carolyn Jessop

message: Carolyn Jessep is the best Selling author of Escape.  The book is the number on best selling religious book for women on Amazon.com. It is current and important because of the ongoing court procedings related to the FLDS church and their leader Warren Jeffs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyorunner (talk • contribs) 14 December 2007
:Hi. I've added a little bit to help establish notability. Please feel free to continue. It's helpful if you can cite sources to verify her status as a best-selling author. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: One poster notes his/her belief that the article has some problems being perceived as neutral.  As it was not talked about on this talk page before being noted on the article, another poster removed the "neutrality" tag. (edited for poor spelling and grammar) Miagirljmw14 19:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Russell Bishop

message: Yes I know we are nut supposed to have dab pages with only one entry.  Now consider: your name is Russell Bishop, you are not a notable person but neither are you a sex offender.  Top Google hit for your name says that you're a sex offender.  Not good.
So we (the OTRS cabal and Jimbo) decided to make a dab page and do this thing, to make a hurt and upset person less hurt and upset.  It costs us roughly nothing, does not degrade the encylopaedia and makes someone's life a little better. Guy (Help!) 14:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Frank Houston, Geoffrey Prime, Bob Shell, Gabriel Williams, and the rest of the :Category:Sex offenders tree. If this is the cabal & Jimbo direction, don't those need to be sanitized as well? -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was a request from a member of the public who was coming under considerable strain. It was seen as a reasonable request and so it has been acted upon. No need for that tone. Woody (talk) 20:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no tone.  I actually expected that the others would be sanitized too, if there's a cabal decision behind it.  Here's another good candidate, in that an actual dab page can be created: William Jordan. -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry if I have misinterpreted you comment, I thought you were moaning about the cabal. I have fixed the William Jordan one. Woody (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RFC Bad Reichenhall

message: I see no reason why RC Bad Reichenhall should be deleted. It is a sports club and not a group or person as your message suggested. The page may be bare at the moment but that is because it is a rather new club. In 2008, when the club gets going into the domestic competition (as I said in the article) then there will be much more to say including Season, History, Colours, Results etc. I am also hoping to direct people to the page who might have some more information which can be added. As I've done with other rugby league clubs (see West Wales Sharks and Bridgend Blue Bulls). Please leave the page as it is for at least 7 days so that I can try to expand it. Poiuytre (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:George L. Carlson

message: Just a note for everyone, this page is very much under construction. On a good note, I will be giving a phone call to my great aunt June, who is Carlson's eldest of two daughters. My gran, the younger daughter Alice, passed away when I was only 7, and I am her only living grandchild. (I once had a younger sister.) June had several children and has many grandchildren, but they all live in California so I hardly know them, sadly. But I'll call Aunt June and interview her, record the interview, and provide a transcript with downloadable MP3 (or at least I plan to.) --Wonderlandalli (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I've had to redact the obituary, copyright issues preclude us from using that material "as is", except in much much smaller bites.  --j⚛e deckertalk 06:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey, what happened to the memorabilia you had there and the mp3s? Those can be used. Did you have anything to do with the book on Carlson that came out a few years ago? --Bluejay Young (talk) 17:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Wonderlandalli|Wonderlandalli]]
Talk:Warren Storm

message: Anyone know how come there were two Shondells groups operating in the U.S. during the sixties? Apart from the Warren Storm version, there was also the more famous Tommy James and the Shondells, of course. It seems rather strange to me that there were not copyright or similar issues at the time. Editrite! (talk) 00:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shondells
Talk:Colorado Department of Transportation

message: Why does this article talk about Airports?  What do Airports have to do with CDOT?  Lets get this reviewed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.146.211 (talk) 05:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Div of Aeronautics regulates(along with FAA) and funds Colorado airports; and provides educational programs to airports. The list of airports will be moved to the CDOA article in-time. WPColo editors will be updating the many Colo depts and agencies. Stay tuned. CheersLanceBarber (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments - Aeronautics Div
Talk:Silt out

message: with reference to the page of speedy deletion  under the section "Non-criteria" it clearly states that an article which qualifies as a stub is not to be deleted. Please explain why the article was marked.
Skogstokerier (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion 
Talk:Guizhou JL-9

message: somebody really needs to redo the math on that thrust to weight ratio, 1.31 is just stupid, the loaded weight exceeds maximum AB thrust, and the empty weight exceeds military power thrust by more than half a ton. And you don't FLY a plane empty.
I am however, too busy to even do the math.
-C*******Out  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.14.225 (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: According to an article from 2018 Vladimir Karnozov writing for the Aviation International News:
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2018-11-13/ftc-2000g-multirole-fighter-debuts-airshow-china-2018
The top speed of the original FTC-2000/JL-9 is Mach 1.5 (1852 km/h) while the FTC-2000G top speed is Mach 1.2 (1482 km/h). While the altitude isn't given, I think that should be fairly definitive for an English language source. Semi-Lobster (talk) 00:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourced Top Speed
Talk:Pina Pellicer

message: There are no good sources about the final resting place of Pina Pellicer. Two newspapers report her funeral was at Panteón Francés. Another newspaper and Find A Grave say she's buried at Panteón Jardin. There are two different photographs of her grave at Panteón Jardin, one at Wikpedia Commons. Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 21:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resting place
Talk:Calabria (song)

message: Where did you get the info about the original source of the sax hook? I've listened to the Taana Gardner song a bunch of times and I can't hear it anywhere. Is it some special version of that song that contains the hook?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prshgshl (talk • contribs) 05:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of hook 

message: Can anyone add why this song has the name Calabria? Gryffindor 20:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Other deficiencies: no mention of its newfound popularity in a national Target ad, no discussion of the language of its lyrics or their meaning. Robert K S (talk) 04:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Usage in advertising is irrelevant unless the track went back to the charts. "Calabria" doesn't have lyrics on its original form, they were added later. --Pc13 (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't completely agree with your first statement, and unless there is a separate article for the lyrics-added version, this article is the appropriate place for a discussion of those lyrics. Robert K S (talk) 08:55, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unless there are available sales figures or reported charts placements indicating the advert improved sales of the track, it's only trivia. Thousands of songs are used in commercials and very few derive some popularity from it. But if you can prove "Calabria" sales increased after that advert, then it's fine. But since Target is an American store, that sales increase probably happened only in America. As for the lyrics, what's there to discuss? It's just newly recorded ragga vocals - popular dance music isn't exactly known for its profound lyrical messages. You'd need to source citing what scholar analysis there is of such lyrics. --Pc13 (talk) 12:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  name? 

message: Hmm, sad enough, but I think I have to contradict the statement of being "the first posthumously charted Number 1 single".
This has been accomplished by the first ever posthumously released single "(Sittin' On) The Dock of the Bay" by Otis Redding, which got Number 1 status subsequently. I think this passage has to be deleted. Feinmotoriker (talk) 23:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  first posthumously charted Number 1 single 

message: Can a knowledgeable contributor indicate the genre and sub-genre(s) to which this song belong? George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre and sub-genre(s)?
Talk:Quedagh Merchant

message: : The source mentions the Quedagh Merchant, yet the title of the article is different — Quedah Merchant. Is there a mistake? --Hillock65 (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to most used spelling.Neonblak talk -  02:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: This article only uses one reference for most of the information included, I think it needs a few more reliable sources (and some kind of ref cleanup to let the reader know what books you are using, not just Zachs)... - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, I believe the online articles written upon the ship's discovery are using Zacks as their historical reference as well.  It may not be possible to get this to GA, but it's worth getting this as well done as I can before I move on.Neonblak talk -  15:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Google books found a few that were written before Zacks'... it might be worth checking out, even if just to "spice up" the reflist... If they say the same thing, you might consider replacing a couple of the Zacks inlines with others... IMHO, when I see a reflist like that, I think to myself, "What if that one book was wrong?"... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I will try more thorough searches.  Also, I want to put an info-box in the article, but unsure of which to use.  There just isn't enough information for a "Ship", and probably not the right subject for a "Shipwreck".  The ship was scuttled, not "wrecked".Neonblak talk -  21:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Siri Tachi

message: A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Siri Tachi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Siri Tachi.  --EEMIV (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Siri Tachi
Talk:Greek Orthodox Church of the Annunciation

message: "Church of the Annunciation, also known as the Church of St. Gabriel."
Wrong. Church of St Gabriel, period. The episode it connects to is indeed the Annunciation according to James, but this doesn't change the fact that the dedication is to the Archangel Gabriel and the name is Church of St Gabriel. Arminden (talk) 10:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title 

message: pls mind "clarify" tags.
Emmett is quoted as using 1989 booklet of s local Church committee as source for the history of the site. Is it a RS, reliable source? Pringle sure is. Arminden (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor editing (use of sources, wording) 

message: :"ancient Armenian tilework"
The source seems to be Wareham. Has it been dated? "Ancient" can mean anything in English. If older than Armenian Genocide (see Armenian ceramics in Jerusalem), is it Armenian per se, or Anatolian in a wider sense (see İznik pottery#İznik and Kütahya)? Arminden (talk) 11:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenian tilework
Talk:Bishnu Pada Ray

message: Note:  Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition 

message: He is not former MLA of West Bengal Bishnu Pada Ray, who recently passed away.￼ Arabi Abrar (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are correct. I have fixed all instances of misidentification that I could see. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 22:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same name