Talk:Blitzkrieg (song)

message: :Image:BlitzkriegXF.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BlitzkriegXF.jpg

message: Does this article belong at Blitzkrieg (song)? This seems more like an EP than a single (the "single" isn't even the first song on the disc), and the article talks much more about the disc than the song. I'm thinking it belongs at Blitzkrieg (EP). (Blitzkrieg (single) is not in line with normal WP naming conventions.) Thoughts? MrMoustacheMM (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just have a naming convention that includes singles, then? If EPs are allowed then surely singles should be, particularly CD5 formats with tons of songs. We have already recognized a problem with the naming conventions and the reality that they are trying to reflect so why not just make the change? Isn't Wikipedia all about change and improvement? It seems pointless to hobble people and prevent them from being productive just because it does not fit the current conventions. Imagine if everyone did that. What progress would there be in the world?--Nicholas0 (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to propose your change at the talk page for WP:SONGDAB. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article location 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blitzkrieg (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100626142337/http://www.kmfdm.net/news/records-frame.htm to http://www.kmfdm.net/news/records-frame.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified