Talk:Shark tooth

message: I created this article, and need help trying to link its contents to outside articles. I am new at writing articles, but I have edited dozens of other articles within the past year. Any help is greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! Daniel 02:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: The link in ref. no. 6 seems to be broken. Miller9904 (talk) 07:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up Needed For This Article

message: :Image:Tiger shark tooth anatomy 006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Tiger shark tooth anatomy 006.jpg

message: If there is no objection, I will merge Shark Tooth Collecting into this article. --Kannie | talk 01:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: There have been some page moves to keep the title plural. Article titles are normally singular unless they are about a set (such as Arabic numerals) that require a plural. They aren't plural merely because the topic is numerous — cf. the articles tooth and ant. — kwami (talk) 05:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  tooth vs. teeth 

message: This whole section seems to be a shallow excuse for a collector to display their collection. It adds nothing to the article. I suggest that it be removed.--203.129.54.134 (talk) 06:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the problem is that it doesn't add an encyclopedic value. The section makes some pretty bold claims, with which I, as a collector and dealer, really disagree. It would at least need some citations from very reliable sources. If you want, I can add some photos that would do exactly the same thing, but would be more encyclopedic. Perhaps some photos of different species.--THobern 12:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone deleted this discussion, so I deleted the mention of Riker cases. I left the pix pending the judgement of other editors. kwami (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Blocks of unrelated images shouldn't really be in the article. I removed them and over the coming days will be putting in pictures that relate to the body of the article.--THobern 23:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riker Cases 

message: I added a single sentence on the origin of teeth at the bottom of the 'overview' para.  I tagged it myself as I don't have a source, other that a documentary show I watched.  Can someone expert expand this bit pls, and add a source? Andrewjlockley (talk) 22:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (Ignore the mismatched ideas, I'm typing this as I go) Well, some early sharks, such as the Devonian Cladoselache were devoid of dermal denticles all together, as evidenced by their fossils, yet they still had tri-cusped teeth. Although, I think I know what you're getting at. I recall a documentary that said teeth evolved from denticles as well. If you look at the article on Dermal denticles, it also states that "teeth may have evolved from denticle-like structures in primitive fish.", although this statement is also in need of a citation. I think I found a source (reliability?)  here. Apparently, Thelodonts were the first fish to evolve denticles, including internal ones that may led to the evolution of teeth in sharks. If no one objects, I'll add some more information from this ref and others regarding this matter tomorrow, (can't do it tonight) and work on some general other ares that are in need of expansion as well. --Spotty11222 (talk) 01:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of teeth

message: I created fish tooth and fish teeth, which redirect to each other, and then to this page.  That's not great because there's more to fish teeth than shark teeth.  Can some dude who knows lots about teeth please do pages on them? Andrewjlockley (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't think that a page on fish teeth is warranted. No one really cares to look at modern fish teeth, and I think that the main article on Fish can take of that. Fish teeth in the fossil record, imo, are porrly represented, and fish are mainly known from a few scales or fossilized "death plates". The only real fossil fish teeth I can think of belong to Xiphactinus audax, which can be fairly large, but like I said, I don't think that warrants an article on them. Either way, fish teeth aren't commonly as collected as shark's teeth are, as it is a major hobby, with websites around it. You don't see too many websites offering fossil fish teeth for sale. Of course, that isn't a valid idea for not warranting a page, but is an idea. --Spotty11222 (talk) 01:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: inbound redirects

message: I've got a bit of free time on my hands, so I've been making a few major edits and will be uploading some better teeth over the next few days. I've uploaded a picture of a 4" auriculatus tooth, a 6 3/4" megalodon and a 4 9/16" angustiden tooth, which I think is a much better into picture than before. What I'd like to do is shift the focus from a collector/megalodon-centric POV, to a less species-specific, anatomical POV. I'd really appreciate help with the anatomy section. I'll redo the diagram with the Angustiden tooth.--THobern 05:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've made a few major changes to the structure and flow of the article. I'd appreciate it if anyone with a working knowledge of photo shop could insert a scale bar down the botttom of the picture.--THobern 06:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major overhaul 

message: I removed the "buying" and "identification" sections. They were very unencyclopedic, and filled with fairly unverifiable information and speculation. There were, however, a few salvagable points that I'll incorporate into the rest of the article.--THobern 14:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sections 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Shark tooth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071228215453/http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/sharks/InNews/megatoothshark.htm to http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/sharks/InNews/megatoothshark.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204130714/http://www.bishopmuseum.org/exhibits/pastExhibits/1997/treasures/html/WEAPON.html to http://www.bishopmuseum.org/exhibits/pastExhibits/1997/treasures/html/WEAPON.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204130714/http://www.bishopmuseum.org/exhibits/pastExhibits/1997/treasures/html/WEAPON.html to http://www.bishopmuseum.org/exhibits/pastExhibits/1997/treasures/html/WEAPON.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This sentence is in the Types and Functions section under ===Needle-like Teeth===. It makes no sense to me. I capitalized Devonian and added 'citation needed'. As for the sentence itself, I'm not sure the author was trying to say so I don't know what kind of correction is needed. Changing "watsoever" to whatsoever doesn't help.
        "This was the first common style of shark tooth, present in the plentiful have no teeth watsoever teeth of the Devonian, four hundred million years ago."
Confused...
Aimzzz (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sentence makes no sense! 

message: Bold 2404:7C00:41:13A6:D128:54AF:BC78:95CC (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  From where myology came from