Talk:Google Books Library Project

message: They are not part of the project. They are not listed on the partners page. See Partners Bwwm (talk) 01:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: University of mysore

message: *1--Bavarian State Library/Rolf Griebel?
*2--Columbia University/James Neal?
*3--Committee on Institutional Cooperation/Barbara McFadden Allen?
*4--Complutense University of Madrid/Carlos Berzosa?
*5--Cornell University/Ann R. Kenney?
*6--Ghent University Library/Sylvia Van Peteghem?
*7--Harvard University/Sidney Verba?
*8--Keio University/S. Sugiyama?
*9--National Library of Catalonia/Dolors Lamarca?
*10--New York Public Library/David Ferriero?
*11--Princeton University/Karin Trainer?
*12--Stanford University/Michael A. Keller?
*13--University of California/Daniel Greenstein?
*14--University Library of Lausanne/Hubert A. Villard?
*15--University of Michigan/John P. Wilkin?
*16--University of Mysore?
*17--University of Oxford/Ronald Milne?
*18--University of Texas at Austin/Fred Heath?
*20--University of Virginia/Karin Wittenborg?
*21--University of Wisconsin at Madison/Edward Van Gemert?
Does this seem like a plausible strategy? suggesting an implied invitation? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links for possible development in this article?

message: I found this article cohesive. The paragraphs are tied together and the article itself is no-nonsense. It is an impressive work. Maybe someday it will be a "Good article". Kushal 02:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  a very good article 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: * http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Google_Book_Search/Partnerbibliotheken
* http://www.onb.ac.at/austrianbooksonline/faq.htm#Toc354414817 --132.230.1.27 (talk) 12:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a very misleading article without any deeper knowledge!!!! 

message: The following text has been removed from the article because this is backed up with this as the source.
#The source is a discussion forum and does not qualify as a reliable source.
#The source seems to make no mention of the given concern. 
Besides, this does not seem to have any factual basis. Google's scanning process does not harm the books. (See this and this.) Besides, Google itself states on a help page that Google has developed innovative technology to scan the contents of books without harming them. In addition, we won't scan any book that we or our library partners deem too fragile, and once we've scanned a book, it is promptly returned to the library collection. SD0001 (talk) 07:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text