lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:London Borough of Islington

message: I dispute the reversion of my edits. 'Male prison' is ungrammatical, as it implies the institution has a gender. How can a prison be male? My edit, on the other hand, explained clearly the basis of the gender division between the two incarceration institutions. 86.139.197.33 (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Moved this section to talk because excessive trivia  RJFJR (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Buses

message: This seems like trivia to me so I moved it to talk. RJFJR (talk) 19:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In popular culture

message: Wards will change on the 15th October 2021. See The London Borough of Islington (Electoral Changes) Order 2020 --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New wards from 2020
Talk:Proper adjective

message: This article was inspired by a question on the reference desk: Wikipedia:Reference desk archive/Language/June 2006#“Proper Adjectives”?. --Mathew5000 19:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of this article 

message: Perhaps "Orwellian" is a better example than Frenchly or Koreanly :) Bob Enyart, Denver radio host at KGOV (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Orwellian topic
Talk:London Borough of Merton

message: How is Morden bigger than Raynes Park? Raynes Park and Morden are at least of an equal size!--Launchballer 08:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large commercial centres? 
Talk:London Borough of Wandsworth

message: Surely this ranks as start class rather than stub???--Lang rabbie 23:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed,and amended Paulbrock 23:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Battersea Power Station really in Clapham? I personally think this is wrong. It is very close to Battersea Power Station and next to what I would call 'old' Battersea. Any objections to changing this? Or some proof that the power station site is in Clapham? Gaffertape (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Landmarks

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wandsworth Parks Police failed with sizable minority support to merge here.  The final !Votes were 6 keeps including 3 weak keeps; 1 neutral; 2 deletes; and 3 to redirect here.  Plus, the non-!voting admin strongly disagreed with the "keep" outcome so that's probalby another delete.  That's a !vote of 6 keeps and 6 who favor some form of removing the existing article under that name, and 1 neutral.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The link does not appear to have anything to do directly with the named mayor. Jackiespeel (talk) 23:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ... and there's a new mayor too.  NebY (talk) 08:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Mayor

message: i honestly think that the ipa phonological transcription (between "//") should be accompanied by a pure phonetic one with a non-rhotic realisation ˈwɒndzwɜːθ for the sake of informativeness. Sacdegemecs (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation
Talk:Scarecrow (Marvel Comics)

message: As of 10-16-2008, there is no picture depicting Marvel's Scarecrow in the article. Can someone make an image donation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.237.219.34 (talk) 21:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Picture

message: "
Scarecrow hasn action figure for the Ghost Rider movie line by Hasbro. A "comic-styled", five-inch figure including crows and a pitchfork, was included as part of a Toys R' Us exclusive figure-set, "The Spider & The Scarecrow".
"
Sounds messed up... allow me to fix it. 
01:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Toys
Talk:Dezerter

message: "Dezerter is regarded as one of the most influential bands in Polish rock"
citation?
I'm taking that out for now, as there are many influential Polish rock bands. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.58.10.252 (talk • contribs) .
IMHO thats not actually true - definitly they were not first Polish  punk rock band, they become famous after 1986, when first and greates wave of polish punk was gone. So, maybe they were influential Polish punk rock  music band. Maybe, but "one of the most influential bands in Polish rock" - not true!!! Szczur Zosia 18:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Szczur Zosia, Dezerter had been famous long before 1986. Find out about their performance in 1984 Jarocin Festival or about popularity of their single, issued in 1983 by Tonpress.They were not the first punk band, but the article does not state it. About their being influential - please find more influential Polish punk bands Tymek 02:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Why are the album titles actually translated? It won't say anything to non-Polish readers anyway, besides they're not translated correctly. No significance at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.236.0.201 (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album names
Talk:Sharon Ventura

message: :has served as a member of the Fantastic Four and the female wrestlers known as the Grapplers.
:Team affiliations	Grapplers
Reading Grapplers (comics) I only see Ventura listed as someone who has opposed Butterball, Cowgirl and Magilla. No mention of her being a member herself. Can someone clarify what issue she was a member and mention when she joined both here and on the team's article, if true? ScratchMarshall (talk) 04:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Grapplers membership
Talk:London Borough of Camden

message: "This mix of deprivation and affluence gives camden an exciting and somewhat dangerous edge"
Delete?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.47.209.8 (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion?

message: This event  is described thus:
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  21 June 2014 event 

message: I have restored the Coat of Arms of the London Borough of Camden to the article, as the image was deleted (for reasons unbeknownst). Though the Coat of Arms itself is mostly redundant, the original granted on 10/09/65 remains in use and was never to my knowledge retracted or nullified in any way, thus I think it is suitable for the article on official as well as historic grounds, thanks, - H (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of Arms 
Talk:Doctor Destiny

message: None of the sources refer to him as "Doctor Destiny" or even mention the name. I was under the impression that they didn't have the rights to the character. --Aquillion (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the television!Sandman version actually the same character?
Talk:Royal Borough of Greenwich

message: There is a need for qualitative information about the local authority and its administration. League Tables, Schools, Housing, administration, known corruption. etc. from local expert. Monophysite 16:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: qualitative information 

message: Apparently the status will be awarded on 3 February. There will be a new coat of arms:  if someone wants to have a go at drawing it!
I presume we will move this article move to Royal Borough of Greenwich- currently a redirect (to match Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames when the change kicks in?Lozleader (talk) 00:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal borough
Talk:Cedar Falls Community School District

message: I'll add links to the schools later
----Danlock2 19:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I noticed this on the school watch page and felt it warranted saving and potentially expansion to include coverage of the elemenary and junior high schools that should not have their own pages. I removed the prod template after doing some basic research at the district page and writing up a nice stub. Erechtheus 22:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/addition 

message: Found https://www.cfschools.org/about-us/school-boundary-maps and https://www.cfschools.org/about-us/school_boundary_maps
PDF: https://dx1slceezt1vd.cloudfront.net/attachments/453c0afe04270a1c2f3a2e227171c749ac459719/store/ca74cf54365be8cf1961210810bb2ef367078c3d170a10931c111672255e/BoundaryChangeCF_Schools+July+2018+ver+1.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundary maps
Talk:Lancaster Bible College

message: I've added several new references to reliable third-party sources, so that now only 4 of 11 references are to sources from the college itself. I'm removing the  tag now. -- DanielKlotz (talk ·  contribs) 21:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Sources 

message: LBC was granted an exception to Title IX in 2016 which allows it to legally discriminate against LGBT students for religious reasons.
This is biased commentary. If the article should include this at all, the perjorative language should be altered. 47.200.149.248 (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks accurate and objective to me. What alternative do you propose? ElKevbo (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to reject •Cyberwolf•talk? 19:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased commentary 

message: Recently notable alumni have been removed as well as a lot of factual updates made regarding degrees offered, international students policy, accreditation, cited rankings, cited sports achievements, spiritual life, etc. This is the profile that once existed and got reverted>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lancaster_Bible_College&oldid=1184973647 
I've also shared my employee disclosure. For a college wikipedia page to be stripped of their only alumni without justification or having a reason, is concerning.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67longfellow (talk • contribs) 
:Hello! Wikipedia requires that all information be cited by reliable sources to confirm notability. You added information that was not sourced and did not reply to concerns with this information. Please review WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:UNIGUIDE. These are policies you need to be familar with. If you provide information on this talk page with reliable sources, it will be considered for addition. Thank you! glman (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, you claim that information was removed "without justification". The justification is clearly listed in the activity log, citing Wikipedia policy. glman (talk) 14:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni and Credible Information Removed 

message: I see some discussion of this in the section above, but this edit warring over uncited assertions is not moving the pagespace forward. So long as these promotional edits continue to be added with no citations from reliable sources independent of the subject, they will be be reverted. Please stop adding this material unless cited to some source besides the subject. Note: if you're working on behalf of what the college wants said about itself, you're missing the point of Wikipedia. It's not merely a listing of current businesses. That is the yellow pages. BusterD (talk) 22:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connected contributors adding lots of poorly cited detail
Talk:American Skiing Company

message: This article needs some clarification between ASC and LBO.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrclark (talk • contribs) 14:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LBO

message: User User:Ckatz continues to remove External links section.  Only one free site exists on internet with history and source documents, which has been linked, and was basis of data in article. Jrclark (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the note on your talk page. Per WP:EL, a rationale for inclusion should be established prior to mass inclusion. In addition, the site has been used in some articles as a reference, when in fact there are questions as to its appropriateness with respect to verifiability and reliability. --Ckatzchatspy 18:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Site in question contains original source documents to back up data in this article.  Not sure why you feel the need to single out this link I've added, while you haven't removed other links I've added that are of similar nature.  Data is accurate and has been recognized in publications such as Boston Globe.  Jrclark (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not so much a case of "singling out" this link, as opposed to this one in particular being drawn to one's attention. If you can provide links to the Globe material that you mentioned, it would help in assessing the matter. --Ckatzchatspy 18:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Data is contained on the site that was removed from External links.  Jrclark (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Intrawest

message: I'm newer to the editing space so I'm a little confused about the "| traded_as = " in the source. In the actual article it doesn't appear to be very clear that Intrawest is no longer listed as SNOW, it just appears like that is the actual listing. 
Because of this confusion, is it better if we just remove that from the sidebar altogether or would that violate some convention? Alternatively, would it make sense to somehow better highlight the "was" portion of the listing?
For context, Intrawest is no longer listed on NYSE and Snowflake, a pretty big firm now has the SNOW listing. Wattsinabox (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WAS Listed as SNOW
Category talk:People from Bismarck, North Dakota

message: This category is unnecessary given that the :Category:People from North Dakota is not all that large.  Given that John Hoeven considers Minot to be his hometown, the only listing here is tenuous at best. --AlexWCovington (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, Alex.  I don't see that this category is needed...at least not at this time.  --MatthewUND(talk) 22:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needed?
Talk:Yuri II Boleslav

message: It looks like this individual may be better known as Jurij II of Halicz.  Does anyone have English-language sources of information on him?  How is his name generally listed in their indexes? --Elonka 20:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 
Talk:Middlesex Guildhall

message: The location of Westminster was obviously chosen because there was nowhere within oddly shaped Middlesex that could be got to as easily from all other places in the county. Does anyone have a source to back that up? MRSC (talk) 08:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would imagine that a pragmatic decision reached possibly as a compromise, by majority vote or consensus, of a large body of councillors and a bench of justices, would be impossible of analysis such as to fix one reason for that decision.  One could not cite any one given motive as an encyclopaedic statement of reasons. LG02 (talk) 20:51, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's it! It is probably on record in the minutes.  Thanks. MRSC (talk) 15:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Location chosen by MCC
Talk:Parliament Square

message: The statue of Cromwell is on the forecourt of the Houses of Parliament, not in Parliament Square.--Runcorn 07:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olive Cromwell 

message: Dear Londoners!
   Is it so dificult to do decent photos of the statues around the square using flash during the day,
 so the statues' details are shown too, please?! Chop, chop! 70.18.5.215 22:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just out of interest how was Smuts a Nazi. He fought with the allies against the Nazis (despite opposition from Afrikaner NAtionalists) and he wasnt part of the National government that replaced him in 1948? Biscuit1018 (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I went out and took some decent photos today. Have replaced most of them in the article and reorganised it so it provides a definitive list of the statues. --TBM10 (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do better photos of the statues dear Londoners! 

message: Er, .... is this a complete list? It would be desirable to have a definitive list of (or even a separate article on) all the statues in the square, "including" is (more than) a little vague. 78.48.240.121 (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: List of public art in Westminster--Egghead06 (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statues 

message: It symbolically represents different arms of the state on each side of the square - Legislature to the east (the Houses of Parliament), Executive to the north (Whitehall), Judiciary to the west (the Supreme Court), and Church to the south (Westminster Abbey).
While this is quite a neat idea, it cannot be right - the Supreme Court is only a few years old and is situated in what was, until 2009, the Middlesex Guildhall.
Le Crapaud (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbolism

message: Please could somebody add a section to the main page about the flags flown on Parliament Square? It should include:
* who decides which flags are flown
* which flags are flown usually
* unusual flag flying
* when the flags have been at half-mast
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BethLynette (talk • contribs) 10:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags
Talk:William Easterly

message: I know it sounds trivial (and silly), but i can't find his age. anyone? - Nudve 13:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the author record in the catalogue of the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, Easterly was born in 1957. --Minderbinder-de (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old is Willima Easterly? 

message: 'infamous colonial conceit of yore' (referring the Kipling's poem), why should it be considered a 'infamous conceit' when current attempts at aid have had far worse, perhaps even 'infamous' effects on populations. As for 'yore', yore indicates long past as opposed to 'recent history', please clean up.Twobells (talk) 12:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for clarity 

message: I removed the paragraph below on the basis that it is not central to the development issues debated by Easterly, Sachs, Sen, and others.  It is no longer available on the Spin.com site but a transcript was found found on www.paulavion.com.
In February 2010, a parody called "A Highly Deplorable, Imaginary Conversation Between Famous Economists" appeared on the SPIN.com site, suggesting that the "debate" between Easterly, Sachs and Moyo was at least partly a function of careerism.A Highly Deplorable, Imaginary Conversation Between
Famous Economists,   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmdnc (talk • contribs) 20:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed material from Criticisms 

message: Whoever wrote that - Easterly is a critic of Ha Joon Chang; I am not quite convinced with that. Any evidences on it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.209.145.241 (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critic with Ha Joon Chang? 

message: Is it me or is the "Productivity and factor world theory" section very unclear?--109.196.118.133 (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Productivity and factor world theory 

message: Much of this article - I did some editing - still reads like it came directly from Easterly's resume or biographical web pages. That's a violation of WP:V; see also WP:NOT. Articles in Wikipedia are supposed to be created using secondary sources - that is, articles written about Easterly, not articles written by him. If, instead, what is put into this article is someone's interpretation of Easterly's works, that's original research, which is not allowed.
For example, I removed the entire "Productivity and factor world theory" section, which had one citation, to something written by Easterly. That's clearly a WP:NOR violation. 
I personally don't have enough interest in the topic to spend a lot of time revising the article, particularly because that would have to start with removing perhaps half of the text. But I'm noting the problems here, as encouragement for someone else to do some cutting. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 04:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violations of [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:V]]
Talk:List of MTV2 broadcast affiliates

message: I've taken out the Indy affilaite, WBXI, as it now shows MTV Tr3́s programming. Might be worth a look at the other affils to see if some of them may have also made the switch.  Lambertman 14:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[MTV Tr3́s]]

message: I remember I used to see MTV2 on broadcast over-the-air in Denver on channel 55. I could get it on some TV's in my house, but most of them I couldn't, and in the last few years, I haven't been able to pick it up on any of them. What's going on? --Char645 06:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Denver

message: There also used to be a channel around Buffalo NY.  It was a weak signal in the 50-60s range 76.180.192.63 (talk) 15:19, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Buffalo
Talk:WSEC

message: I realize that Southern Illinois University acquired Network Knowledge.
I am proposing that the 1970-1991 or 1995 Convocom history be separated, into a separate entry (history)
and the 1995-2020 Network Knowledge history have its own entry.  I suggest that 1995 be used since that was the date that Governor Jim Edgar changed higher education structure in Illinois and Dr. Gruber desired for relocated HQ to Springfield. Grew up in west-central IL, and served as WIU representative for Convocom creation.  I knew the principles, now passed. Beatgr 18:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose Network Knowledge & Convocom as Separate Wikipedia entries 

message: , because you disagreed with one aspect of a painstaking edit was no reason to revert the whole thing; WP:BROKE is a vague, brief essay. I'm done here; the article is sort of a mess, but I don't like copyediting TV-station articles because of ownership issues such as this (BTW, your reversion restored formatting which is deprecated at . Miniapolis 14:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Which formatting was deprecated? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The callsign-meaning parameter: . Miniapolis 16:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sledgehammer revert